Post on 05-Mar-2023
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN MARKET FUNDAMENTALSAND APARTMENT REIT PERFORMANCE
by
Andrew A. FriestedtB.S., Construction Management, 1996
Arizona State University
and
Brian J. TusaB.S., Accounting, 1994
Boston College
Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of theRequirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development
at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
September 2001
© Andrew A. Friestedt and Brian J. TusaAll rights reserved
The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly thispaper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part.
Author:.. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
August 3, 2001
Author:Department of frbin Studies and Planning
August 3, 2001
Certified By:William C. Wheaton
Professor of EconomicsThesis Supervisor
Accepted by:William C. Wheaton
Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN MARKET FUNDAMENTALSAND APARTMENT REIT PERFORMANCE,
by
Andrew A. Friestedtand
Brian J. Tusa
Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planningon August 3, 2001 in partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development
ABSTRACT
This paper empirically examines the correlation between apartment REIT performance (asmeasured by Funds from Operations, Net Operating Income, Gross Rental Revenue, Net Income,Market Capitalization and CAP Rate) and market fundamentals (as measured by weightedaverage rent growth, weighted average employment growth, weighted average stock growth andweighted average excess demand). The objective of this paper is to explain the variance inhistorical apartment REIT performance based on historical market fundamentals.
Market fundamentals are broadly defined as the employment growth, population growth, stockgrowth and rent growth. More detailed definitions of market fundamentals are provided withinthe paper. Independent variables are developed from market data collected from 57 MSAs.Using these data, weighted averages are generated in order to isolate geographical effects. Theseindependent variables are regressed against measures of financial performance of apartmentREITs as of December 31, 2000.
The results show that weighted average rent growth (given NREI rent data) and growth inapartment units explain 37.1% of the variance in the percent change in FFO per unit and 37.8% ofthe variance in the percent change in market capitalization per unit across the sample of selectedapartment REITs. Furthermore, weighted average rent growth (given government rent data) doesa relatively poor job of explaining the variance in the percent change in FFO per unit.
Thesis Supervisor: William C. Wheaton
Title: Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our wives for providing endless support and understandingthroughout the project in the past school year. Their help made the difficult times seembearable. We would also like to thank our classmates for their availability to answer ournumerous questions.
We would also like to thank Professor Wheaton for his assistance in data collection aswell as providing leadership and guidance for the research.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 3
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 06
1.1. Context of Research ...................................................................................... 06
1.2. Supply and Demand Issues Affecting Market Fundamentals ........................ 10
1.3. Research Issue ............................................................................................... 11
2. RESEARCH M ETHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 13
2.1. Literature Review.......................................................................................... 14
2.2. Empirical Data Sources ................................................................................. 29
2.3. Inform ational Interviews ............................................................................... 31
3. STATISTICAL RESEARCH . ........................................................................................... 33
3.1. M arket Fundamentals .................................................................................... 33
3.2. REIT Financial Performance ......................................................................... 37
4. STATISTICAL EXAMINATION OF CORRELATION .......................................................... 42
4.1. Statistical Sample - REITs ............................................................................ 42
4.2. Statistical Sample - M arkets ......................................................................... 44
4.3. Descriptive Statistics - Dependent Variables ................................................ 49
4.4. Descriptive Statistics - Independent Variables .............................................. 50
5. REGRESSIONRESULTS ................................................................................................ 52
5.1. Additional Research ...................................................................................... 60
6. CONCLUSIONS. ........................................................................................................... 62
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY. .......................................................................................................... 64
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 4
Table of Exhibits
State Distribution of Apartments ................................................................. 06No. of Units on Property ............................................................................. 07Apartment Ownership ................................................................................. 08Apartment REIT Sample ............................................................................. 44MSAData Coverage ................................................................................... 45Statistical Summary - Dependent Variables ................................................ 49Statistical Summary - Independent Variables ............................................ 51WARG, WAEG, WASG Panel Data Regression Results ............................ 52Panel Data Regression Results (excluding apartments growth) .................. 54Panel Data Regression Results .................................................................... 55Cross Sectional Data Regression Results .................................................... 56
Table of Appendices
Appendix 1:Appendix 2:Appendix 3:Appendix 4:Appendix 5:Appendix 6:Appendix 7:Appendix 8:Appendix 9:Appendix 10:Appendix 11:Appendix 12:Appendix 13:Appendix 14:Appendix 15:Appendix 16:Appendix 17:
M arket Data .............................................................................................Apartments, Rental Revenue, NOI, FFO and NI .....................................M arket Cap ..............................................................................................W eighted Averages .................................................................................Cross-Sectional W eighted Averages ........................................................Geographic Concentration- 2000 ...........................................................Geographic Concentration- 1999 ...........................................................Geographic Concentration - 1998 ...........................................................Geographic Concentration- 1997 ...........................................................Geographic Concentration - 1996 ...........................................................W ARG Panel Data Results ......................................................................Panel Data Results (excluding apartment growth) ...................................Panel Data Results (including apartment growth) ....................................Cross Sectional Data Results ...................................................................Percent of Portfolio in M SA with Rent Data ...........................................1 0-REIT Index .........................................................................................10-REIT Data Results .............................................................................
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Exhibit 1:Exhibit 2:Exhibit 3:Exhibit 4:Exhibit 5:Exhibit 6:Exhibit 7:Exhibit 8:Exhibit 9:Exhibit 10:Exhibit 11:
67777879808185899397
101103116134144145146
5
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Context of Research
As of March 2000, there were approximately 17 million apartments in the US.' Of
these, approximately 54% are located in major metropolitan cities and another 40%
are located within the suburban ring of these metropolitan markets.2 Additionally,
construction started on 331,600 apartment units in 1999, and another $24.1 billion
worth of apartment building permits were issued.3 Below is a distribution breakdown
by state.
Exhibit
State Distribution of ApartmentsState # of Apts. Rank State # of Apts. RankAlabama 178,616 26 Montana 29,725 49Alaska 30,609 48 Nebraska 98,503 34Arizona 349,676 15 Nevada 189,801 24Arkansas 84,421 38 New Hampshire 63,719 40California 2,437,646 1 New Jersey 486,500 8Colorado 306,010 18 New Mexico 66,862 39Connecticut 188,261 25 New York 1,943,860 2Delaware 39,092 45 North Carolina 348,516 16Dist. of Columbia 107,852 33 North Dakota 49,836 42Florida 1,146,079 4 Ohio 620,066 6Georgia 453,548 10 Oklahoma 149,228 30Hawaii 93,071 35 Oregon 205,068 23Idaho 34,077 47 Pennsylvania 531,758 7Illinois 808,124 5 Rhode Island 57,175 41Indiana 286,892 20 South Carolina 158,402 29Iowa 130,681 31 South Dakota 37,883 46Kansas 118,836 32 Tennessee 274,060 21Kentucky 168,371 28 Texas 1,460,445 3Louisiana 171,738 27 Utah 92,343 36Maine 48,736 43 Vermont 20,208 50Maryland 358,454 14 Virginia 415,990 12Massachusetts 416,025 11 Washington 403,049 13Michigan 485,375 9 West Virginia 48,573 44Minnesota 313,112 17 Wisconsin 298,640 19Mississippi 88,021 37 Wyoming 15,538 51
'NMHC estimates based on U.S. Census Bureau data.2 NMHC tabulations of data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey for March 20003 U. S. Bureau of the Census, Current Construction Survey 1999
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 6
Missouri 243,994 22Total U.S. 17,153,065
Source. NMHC estimates based on U.S. Census Bureau data.Note: The apartment stock estimates include both occupied and vacant units. Forthese estimates, only units in structures with at least 5 or more units are counted.
Interestingly, the majority of apartments in the US are located in smaller structures,
not the large garden-style or high rise properties so commonly associated with
apartments.
Exhibit 2
# of Units on % ofProperty Total
2 - 99 units 64%100 - 199 units 14%200 - 299 units 9%300 - 399 units 5%400 - 499 units 3%500+ units 4%
Source: NMHC tabulation of unpublished data from the US. Census Bureau's 1995-1996Property Owners andManagers Survey.Note: Statistics refer to privately owned housing and do not include the 13,493 publichousing projects or their 1,326,000 apartments (HUD estimates for 1995-1996).
One reason that the apartment unit per property breakdown favors small properties is
the current U.S. ownership structure. In the aggregate, individuals and partnerships
owned 67.2% of all apartment units.4 Smaller units per property are characteristic of
individual or small partnership ownership, whereas institutional ownership tends to
own larger properties.
4 NMHC tabulations of unpublished data from the U.S. Census Bureau's1995-1996 Property Owners and Managers Survey.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 7
Exhibit 3
Apartment Ownership 2-4 unit 5-49 unit 50+ unitPro es perties Properties
Individuals 84.80% 57.40% 19.20%Partnerships 3.90% 14.90% 32.70%Real Estate Investment Trusts 0.60% 1.10% 3.40%Real Estate Corporations 1.00% 4.00% 9.60%Other Corporations 0.90% 4.00% 4.60%Non-Profits/Co-Ops 0.60% 2.50% 6.00%Other 3.70% 4.60% 4.90%Not Reported 4.50% 11.50% 19.60%
TOTAL 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Source. NMHC tabulations of unpublished datafrom the U.S. Census Bureau's1995-1996 PropertyOwners and Managers Survey.
As of 3rd quarter 2000, there were nineteen equity REITs whose portfolio is at least
90% comprised of apartments.5 This represents approximately 10% of the entire
REIT industry. These nineteen REITs comprise a market capitalization of
approximately $30 billion, or approximately 18% of the entire REIT industry market
capitalization. 6 These statistics speak to the importance and size of the apartment
sector in the REIT industry. Surprisingly, however, REITs only owned 2.1% of all
apartments in the United States as of December 31, 1999. 7 Yet many real estate
observers foresee a shift in the way real estate is owned, declaring that "the future of
commercial real estate is in securities, not direct ownership."8 If REITs truly become
the preferred method of ownership in the US, then apartment REITs certainly have
significant market share yet to obtain.
5 Constituent Companies and Relative Weights in the NAREIT Real-Time Index for July 1, 20016 Ibid7 NMHC tabulations of unpublished data from the U.S. Census Bureau's1995-1996 Property Owners and Managers Survey.8 Richard Schoninger, Prudential Securities, as quoted by Maria Wood, "Cash-Rich for the Next BuyingSpree"
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 8
With a growing trend in public ownership of real estate and apartments, coupled with
a huge market share still available to apartment REITs, a question then becomes, 'is it
possible to predict how apartment REITs will perform, given a certain geographic
concentration for their respective apartment portfolio?'
Prior academic research has touched on this topic, namely "The Determinants of
REIT Franchise Value" by Jim Young and a reprise of that paper by Rosanna Santos-
Wuest. In these papers, regional economic growth opportunities were examined as a
determinant of franchise value, which is the premium/discount to NAV or the value
of the company in relation to its net asset value. These papers, however, included
both apartment and commercial REITs and focused more on the NAV aspect of
REITs.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the correlation between apartment REIT
financial performance (proxied by FFO, rental revenue, rental net operating income,
net income, market capitalization and CAP rate) and market fundamentals (proxied
by weighted average rent growth, weighted average employment growth, weighted
average stock growth and weighted average excess demand). Apartment REIT
performance is empirically analyzed in conjunction with market fundamentals using
regression analysis in an attempt to explain the variation in historical performance of
apartment REITs.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 9
1.2 Supply and Demand Issues Affecting Market Fundamentals
Some previous academic research has focused on supply-demand factors affecting the
investment demand for rental housing and accordingly, the apartment REIT industry.
Kenneth Rosen's paper (1996), "The Economics of the Apartment Market in the
1990s," succinctly explains how the market fundamentals discussed in Chapter 3.0
are affected by supply and demand issues, thus affecting fundamental and investment
demand for rental apartments. Rosen states that, "demand [for rental housing] will be
strong for areas with high in-migration, due to the young age characteristics of
movers, and the high costs of homeownership in many regions. Compounding this
effect is the continued growth in nontraditional households, which tend to be younger
and more likely to rent."9 The size, age distribution and growth rate by age group of
the population are critical factors in determining rental-housing demand. So too is the
increase in household formation relative to population, strong regional in-migration
due to job growth, and the increase in the relative affordability of rental housing on
the East and West coasts because of the sharp rise in prices of single family homes. ' 0
New household formation is being greatly affected by divorce, couples delaying
marriage, surviving elderly spouses' desire to remain in their own living quarters and
very young people living with the opposite sex. Rosen writes that "these dramatic
socioeconomic changes affecting all age groups [and increase in non-traditional
households] have led to a substantial increase in the demand for rental housing units
9 Rosen, "The Economics of the Apartment Market in the 1990's" [1996]o Ibid
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 10
because individual and nontraditional households are more than twice as likely as
family households to occupy rental housing units."'I
Rosen's paper illustrates the increase in the demand side for apartments, highlighting
apartments' increased importance in the coming years. The supply side should follow
suit as long as vacancies remain moderate and the capital supply for apartments
remains in-check. The combination of the increasing demand for apartments and
increased demand for public ownership for REITs helps to set forth the importance of
apartments in the U.S.
1.3 Research Issue
Market research firms, such as Torto Wheaton Research, have demonstrated an
ability to predict MSA rent growth, employment growth and stock growth with
reasonable accuracy. Also predictable, based on US Census Data, is age distribution
and group size. Since it is possible to predict market fundamentals with reasonable
accuracy, is it then possible to explain how apartment REITs perform based on
geographic portfolio concentration? In order to make this jump, three hypotheses are
set forth and tested empirically and/or through the academic research of others. They
are:
1. weighted average employment growth and weighted average stock growth
effectively measure demand and supply growth, which should be a proxy for
weighted average rent growth;
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
" Ibid
11
2. weighted average rent growth should determine net income and FFO / NOI
growth; and
3. FFO growth should determine a REIT's market capitalization growth.
The purpose of this paper is to explore these three hypotheses and determine if such a
correlation exists between market fundamentals and apartment REIT performance.
This correlation will be tested empirically through market data collected for
numerous MSAs and apartment REIT performance data collected on 19 REITs.
The following Chapter describes the research methodology and literature used to
review the correlation between apartment REIT performance and market
fundamentals. Chapter Three provides a more detailed account of the research
methodology and defines the dependent and independent variables. Chapter Four
describes the statistical sample pool used to empirically test the research findings, and
Chapter Five summarizes the results of the empirical tests. Conclusions are presented
in Chapter Six.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 12
2.0 Research Methodology
This study defines the different measures of apartment REIT financial performance
and market fundamentals and quantifies a relationship between the two through
empirical analysis. Numerous explanatory (independent) variables were utilized to
empirically examine and statistically explain an apartment REIT's performance using
regression analysis. Regression analysis measures the relationship between one
economic variable, the "dependent variable" and one or more explanatory variables,
the "independent variables".
The investigation into the determinants of apartment REIT performance began as a
theory proposed by Professor William Wheaton of the MIT Center for Real Estate
and Economics Department. The research was initiated by a review of academic and
industry literature in real estate and finance to establish how a REIT's financial
performance is measured, as well as the appropriate components of market
fundamentals. This work was complemented by informational interviews with
academic practitioners to establish a scope of components for the regression analysis,
particularly with respect to market fundamental data. Through the literature reviews
and informational interviews, the appropriate dependent and independent variables
were established in order to complete the regression analysis.
It is important to note that this paper's research is limited to REITs focusing solely on
apartments and excludes manufactured home REITs. Apartment REITs were selected
because:
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 13
1. The U.S government publishes reliable market data on MSAs
2. Apartment properties should better reflect market fundamentals due to the
apartment lease structure. When compared to office or industrial leases, the
apartment lease is generally shorter term (6 - 18 months) versus an office lease,
which can be as long as 20 years (or even longer). Therefore, the office data is
smoothed over a longer period and doesn't move as quickly as apartment data.
The shorter-term nature of the apartment lease can more accurately reflect the
current market conditions when compared to the longer-term office leases signed
many years ago. Apartments essentially can re-price immediately. Additionally,
office or industrial leases are affected by tenant quality, amount of space leased,
concessions, and/or tenant improvements. Thus in some instances, it can be
difficult to determine the effective lease rate, which can skew the market data.
2.1 Literature Review
A review of literature pertaining to apartment housing, apartment REITs and the
REIT industry as a whole, yielded useful information, but also revealed very little
research to date on the correlation of market fundamentals and apartment REIT
performance. Over the last several years, considerably more has been written about
the REIT industry. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT), an industry group, as well as publications from independent research
firms specializing in the REIT sector, such as Green Street Advisors and The
Penobscot Group, sponsored much of this research. These publications provided the
most useful insight into REIT performance measures. Academic research and
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 14
research sponsored by the National Multi Housing Council (NMHC) provided the
greatest information regarding the apartment industry, particularly economic
information utilized in generating market fundamental data. The NMHC and
NAREIT websites, which provided "one-stop shopping" for apartment and REIT
literature, were a tremendous resource for providing information. A large volume of
writing is in non-academic publications covering current topical issues, particularly
supply and demand issues that may affect the apartment industry, and therefore
apartment REITs, as well as issues concerning REIT performance.
Publicationsfrom Trade Organizations
The NMHC and NAREIT organizations have published several papers relevant to
the apartment industry or apartment REIT industry. Among the papers reviewed,
one of the more notable is NMHC's "Performance Across Local Markets" by Jack
Goodman, which discusses the geographic correlation across local apartment
markets. Specifically, the paper seeks to aid investors in maximizing the
geographic diversification of an apartment portfolio, utilizing rent increases and
vacancy rates among the measures. Two key results in this paper were: 1) some
apartment markets are easier to forecast than others and 2) growing apartment
markets are not always profitable markets. 12 Goodman's research concludes that
rent predictability in some apartment markets is possible while in others it is very
difficult. The reason is that annual percentage increases in rents over the last ten
years is highly correlated in some markets with annual job growth, multi-family
12 Goodman, "Performance Across Local Apartment Markets", [1999].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 15
construction and vacancy rates, while in others there is no correlation at all.
Based on this study, there is no obvious pattern. 13
Goodman's research is important because this thesis attempts to explain
apartment REIT performance, which is predicated upon the ability to predict
market fundamentals, such as rent growth, job growth and stock growth, by
establishing a correlation between performance and fundamentals.
NAREIT has published several reports that were useful in gathering information
on REIT return measures as well as understanding the industry's position on
Funds from Operation (FFO), a topic of much discussion. According to
NAREIT's "Investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts", there are many factors
affecting REIT returns, such as real estate fundamentals, earnings and dividends,
and company fundamentals. An important conclusion of this research is that
although real estate fundamentals may affect the commercial real estate business
as a whole, understanding a REIT's geographic concentration may impact a
certain stock's price more than others, because the economy is not equally strong
in all geographic regions, and economic demand may not increase the demand for
all property types at the same time.' 4 This is important in this thesis as it supports
the use of geographic concentration weights in the empirical analysis discussed in
Chapter Five. By appropriately weighting the geographic concentration of a
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
13 Ibid14 Ibid
16
REIT's portfolio, it is possible to compare different apartment REITs based on the
relative strength or weakness of the real estate markets that exists in that portfolio.
The NAREIT "White Papers on FFO " were informative in defining and
calculating FFO (discussed in greater detail in chapter 3.2). Moreover, the
publication helped explain the history and intended purpose of the financial
measure. Since FFO has been the subject of much debate among industry
observers, this publication set out to clarify the industry's position. That is, FFO
is intended to be a supplemental financial measure of a REIT's performance
which specifically addresses the issue that historical cost accounting, in particular
depreciation, can be misleading, as historical real estate values have risen and
fallen with market conditions.' 5 Therefore, FFO excludes historical cost
depreciation in its calculation. Understanding FFO is important since it is one of
the dependent variables used in this paper's empirical analysis.
Publications from Independent Research Firms
Widely regarded as one of the key financial measures of a REIT, FFO was
initially considered the most important dependent variable in the regression
analysis. Green Street Advisors, however, has issued research reports that
indicate net income may be just as important as FFO. Green Street's "The High
Cost of Owning Real Estate" states that FFO dramatically overstates performance
for most REITs while net income dramatically understates performance for most
REITs. Although it is unclear which measure comes closer to the actual
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 17
economic truth, Green Street feels that net income is a conceptually superior
performance measure because real estate does indeed depreciate (contrary to what
FFO calculates) and net income properly matches revenues with expenses (which
FFO does not do). 16
A change in analyst sentiment also changed the initial importance given to FFO.
Three major Wall Street firms, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup's
Salomon Smith Barney, recently announced that REIT analysts would add an
additional forecast for financial results using net income per share. 17 The reason
for the change is that FFO does not conform to Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (see definition of FFO above). Many analysts feel that FFO represents
a pro forma number. "As with other pro formas, the issue with FFO is there is no
common definition, and people pick and choose the numbers that they use to
calculate FFO.' 8 A major advantage to using net income per share is that gains
and losses on asset sales, a large part of REITs' earnings, are included in the
calculation, which is contrary to the FFO calculation.
As a result of Wall Street's increased emphasis on net income as well as
independent research reports such as Green Street's support of net income, a net
income dependent variable was added for the empirical analysis.
15 NAREIT "White Paper on Funds from Operations", [1999]16 Green Street Advisors, "The High Cost of Owning Real Estate", [1999].17 Starkman, Weil, "Three Firms to Emphasize Different Metric for REITs", [2001].18 Green Street Advisors, "The High Cost of Owning Real Estate", [1999].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 18
Academic Research
Much of the REIT academic research to date has focused on the relationships
between publicly traded equity REITs and the larger stock market forces for
publicly traded equities. Han and Liang (1995) studied the historical performance
of REITs by determining: 1) whether REITs performed differently from the
market portfolio, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the period 1970 - 1993; 2)
whether REIT performance varies significantly over time; and 3) whether the
outcomes of REIT performance studies are sensitive to the choice of performance
benchmarks and REIT samples. Han and Liang concluded that over the 1970 -
1993 period, REIT performance was similar to that of a passively managed
portfolio of three-month treasury bills and stock market portfolio. Also, REIT
performance was not stable over the sample period, concluding that studies that
focus on short time periods may lead to varying conclusions. Most importantly
though, they found that the use of the S&P 500 index lead to results that
overstated the performance of the REIT industry portfolios, relative to the stock
market portfolio. 9
More recent research on the same topic has yielded similar results. Ziering, Liang
and McIntosh (1995) note that "the total return correlation between REITs and the
S&P 500 Index, as well as other standard stock market indexes, spiked
dramatically during the second half of 1998, reversing a trend toward decreasing
19 Han and Liang, "The Historical Performance of Real Estate Investment Trusts", [1995].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 19
correlation over the past three years."20 Ziering, Liang and McIntosh believe
though that this trend is temporary and that there will be a continuation of the
gradual disconnect between the performance of the REIT sector and other capital
market indexes.2 '
Sanders (1997) found that equity REIT returns have a high correlation to the
Wilshire Small Value index and the high-yield corporate bond index. Sanders,
however, notes that there is still a considerable amount of unexplained variation
in REIT returns that cannot be diversified away with major stock and bond
indexes, particularly since 1991.22
Hartzell and Mengden (1986) concluded that equity REIT prices track the stock
market, mirroring the volatility, but have income characteristics that resemble
unsecuritized real estate.23 Similarly, Giliberto found that equity REITs
correlation with the stock market has declined over time and correlation with
bond returns has increased. 24 Intuitively, this makes sense since many investors
view the cash flow stream of leases similar to the cash flow stream of bonds.
20Ziering, Liang, and McIntosh, "REIT Correlations with Capital Market Indexes: Separating Signal FromNoise", [1999].21 Ibid.22 Anthony B. Sanders, "The Historical Behavior of REIT Returns", in Real Estate Investment Trusts,Garrigan and Parsons, [1997].23 Hartzell and Mengden, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts - Are They Stocks or Real Estate?",Solomon Brothers, Inc., [1986].24 S. Michael Giliberto, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts and Portfolio Diversification", SalomonBrothers, Inc., [1989].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 20
Chen and Peiser examine the risk and return characteristics of REITs and their
effects on returns. Specifically, they examined (1) the performance of"new"
versus "old" REITs, (2) the risk-return trade-off of different REIT sectors, and (3)
how certain characteristics of REITs such as size and portfolio diversity affect
performance. Their research indicated that REITs are more highly correlated to
the S&P Mid-Cap 400 index than with the S&P 500 index. This is not surprising
since REITs have smaller capitalizations than the large companies included in the
S&P 500 index. However, the correlation between REITs and the S&P Mid-Cap
400 index is still not very strong.25
Their results also indicate that diversified REITs (multiple property types)
performed worse than non-diversified REITs, meaning the market did not value
diversification by property type as much as it valued more focused investment
strategies. Other results of their study indicate that small REITs ($20 - 100
million in market cap) had higher returns than the large REITs, but also had a
higher standard deviation. Geographically concentrated REITs (investments in
only one state) showed significantly higher returns but also significantly higher
standard deviations than geographically diversified REITs (investments in four or
more states.)
Since investors often perceive investment in equity REITs as comparable to direct
investing in unsecuritized real estate, academic research has attempted to explain
the correlation between equity REIT returns and unsecuritized real estate returns.
25 Chen and Peiser, "The Risk and Return Characteristics of REITs - 1943 - 1997", [1999].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 21
The basic premise to these studies is that equity REIT returns share some
unspecified factor or factors that also affect more traditional unsecuritized real
estate. However, the correlation between indexes of equity REITs and real estate
returns is conflicting, which casts doubt on this assumption. Giliberto's research
(1990) concludes, "the correlation between indexes of equity REITs and real
.,26estate returns is zero."26
Follow-up research by Giliberto finds that the residuals from regressions of both
real estate series on financial asset returns are significantly correlated. After
removing financial asset market influences, the co-movement between equity
REIT returns and the NCREIF Property Index is significant. Giliberto states that
there is a common factor (or factors) associated with real estate that affects both
sets of returns. This may be the pure real estate market fundamentals that are not
shared with financial asset markets but that influence both equity REITs and the
NCREIF Index (private, institutional real estate returns). Additionally, lagged
values of the equity REIT residuals help explain variation in the conventional
unsecuritized real estate return residuals. Giliberto concludes that investors do
capture some portion of real estate market returns by investing in REITs, although
they must accept volatility that approaches that of stocks.27
Lieblich, Pagliari and Webb (1997) conducted similar research to Giliberto's.
Their research was motivated by the theory that long-run behavior of REITs
26 S. Michael Giliberto, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts & Real Estate Returns", [1990]27 Ibid
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 22
should generally follow the behavior of the underlying real estate assets.
Accordingly, the NAREIT Index (historical public REIT returns) is compared to
the NCREIF Index. Unlike previous research, Lieblich, Pagliari and Webb
focused on dividends, investment values and dividend yields to compare the
indexes. 28 As with previous research, a weak statistical relationship between total
returns for securitized and unsecuritized real estate was found. In the short-term,
dividends, investment value and changes in dividend yields between secured and
unsecured real estate were statistically weak even when lags of up to two years
were examined. They concluded that the long-term path of prices for securitized
and unsecuritized real estate exhibited the strongest relationship and that the weak
relationship for explaining total returns may be more attributable to the volatility,.~~~~~~~~2
of dividends and/or changes in dividend yields.29
Nelling and Gyourko (1998) examined the predictability of monthly returns on
equity REITs over the period 1975-1995 and compared them with small and mid-
cap firms. Using a time series approach, their study indicated statistically
significant evidence of predictability of monthly returns. The average monthly
return, however, was insufficient to cover transactions costs necessary to exploit
the prediction. 30
28 Lieblich, Pagliari and Webb, "Historical Behavior of REIT Returns: A Real Estate Perspective", in RealEstate Investment Trusts, Garrigan & Parsons, [19971.29 Ibid.30 Nelling and Gyourko, "The Predictability of Equity REIT Returns", [1998].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 23
Myer and Webb (1994) examined the return properties of equity REITs, common
stocks and unsecuritized commercial real estate with the retail industry used as the
common thread. Again, one of the goals of their research was to explore the long-
term relationship between securitized and unsecuritized real estate. The results of
Myer and Webb's research found evidence that a positive contemporaneous
relationship exists between common stocks and equity REITs. Thus a common
factor (or factors) affects the returns of common stocks and equity REITs that are
unrelated to the general stock market. Their results, however, were inconclusive
in drawing a correlation between commercial unsecuritized real estate and either
equity REITs or common stocks.31
Chan, et al (1990), using a multifactor arbitrage pricing model for the period 1973
- 1987, found that four factors (unexpected inflation, changes in the risk and term
structure of interest rates, and the percentage change in the discount on closed -
end stock funds) consistently drive equity REIT returns. The impact of these
variables is approximately 60 percent of that for common stocks.32
Liu and Mei (1992) examined the predictability of equity REIT returns and their
co-movement with other assets. They found that expected excess returns are
more predictable for equity REITs than for bonds and small-cap and value-
31 Myer and Webb, "Retail Stocks, Retail REITs and Retail Real Estate", [1994].32 Chan, Hendershot and Sanders, "Risk and Return on Real Estate: Evidence from Equity REITs", [19921.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 24
weighted stocks. They also found that equity returns move more closely with
small-cap stocks than with large-cap stocks.33
Similar to previous research, Goldstein and Nelling (1999) examined the
diversification potential of REITs by comparing their return behavior over the
period 1972 - 1998 to the returns on common stocks, small stocks, treasury bills,
long-term government bonds, corporate bonds and the inflation rate. The major
difference in Goldstein and Nelling's work is that the behavior of REIT returns
are investigated in advancing and declining stock markets separately to examine
the claim that REITs provide a good hedge against general stock market declines.
Additionally, both equity and mortgage REITs are studied. The results of the
study indicated that REITs "do not have symmetric hedging properties." In
particular, both equity and mortgage REITs are more highly correlated with
stocks when the market is declining than when it is advancing. 34
Clayton and MacKinnon's (2001) research is very similar to Goldstein and
Nelling in that Clayton and MacKinnon also study the links between REITs and
financial asset returns. However, Clayton and MacKinnon include unsecuritized
real estate returns as one of the factors in order to evaluate the claim that REITs
are more highly linked with direct property markets. Accordingly, Clayton and
MacKinnon examine the correlation between NAREIT and an "unsmoothed" or
"de-lagged" NCREIF index. The NCREIF index is subject to a number of
33 Liu, Hartzell, Grissom, Greig and Mei, "The Predictability of Returns on Equity REITs and Their Co-movement with Other Assets", [1992].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 25
limitations, most notably NCREIF returns lag true market returns as a result of
appraisal smoothing at the individual property level and the inclusion of outdated
information. Clayton and McKinnon counteract these limitations by employing
the Transaction Value Index (TVI) created by Fisher and Geltner (2000). The
TVI aims to undo the lag-induced distortions in the NCREIF index and produce a
more realistic index of property returns. The results of Clayton's and
MacKinnon's work are consistent with previous studies in that REIT market
returns are highly correlated with small cap stocks and uncorrelated with direct
real estate returns over the 1978-1998 time period. However, since 1992, the
equity NAREIT returns were positively correlated and statistically significant
with the de-lagged NCREIF index while the correlation between REITs and
stocks in general fell by a large amount. Clayton and MacKinnon conclude that
"with growth and maturation in the market, the performance of REITs has
become less like the performance of stocks and more like that of the underlying
real estate since the REIT boom of 1992 or 1993." 35
The work of Liang et al. (1996), which relates specifically to apartment REITs
and apartment real estate, is very applicable to this thesis. Their research
examines the possibility that equity apartment REITs provide a proxy for the
ownership of apartment sticks and bricks. For this purpose, a hedged apartment
REIT index was constructed by removing the return components of stocks in
general and non-apartment equity REITs from returns of equity REITs that invest
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
34 Goldstein and Nelling, "REIT Return Behavior In Advancing and Declining Stock Markets", [1999].
26
in apartment real estate. The resulting "double-hedged" apartment REIT index
was found to satisfactorily track the performance of appraisal-based apartment
real estate. Also, the hedged apartment REIT index does not suffer from appraisal
smoothing or seasonality issues. Therefore, the hedged apartment REIT index
can be used as a proxy for apartment real estate.36 They determined this was
significant in making portfolio diversification decisions.
A fair amount of research has been published on REIT pricing, most of which is
in the context of REIT performance relative to the stock market or indices. A
major impact on REIT pricing, the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 paved the
way for greater institutional ownership of REITs. Prior to this law, REITs had to
abide by strict rules in order to qualify for the significant tax advantages that
REITs enjoy. One of the rules that REITs had to comply with was the "five or
fewer" rule. This rule disqualifies a REIT from advantageous tax status if more
than 50% of its shares are held by five or fewer shareholders. This rule restricts
the sources of income and retention of earnings, as well as limited institutional
investment interest in REITs. Since REITs traditionally have small market
capitalizations, institutional buyers found it difficult to accumulate a sufficient
position in an individual REIT without jeopardizing the REIT's tax status.
The 1993 Act modified the "five or fewer" rule, allowing each institutional
beneficiary, rather than the fund itself, to be considered an individual REIT
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
35 Clayton and MacKinnon, "The Time-Varying Nature of the Link between REIT, Real Estate andFinancial Asset Returns", [2000].
27
shareholder. Therefore, institutional investors can now take sizable positions in
REITs without jeopardizing the REITs status. The result has been an increase in
institutional ownership of REIT securities. Chan, Leung and Wang (1998) found
institutional ownership in REITs ranged from 12% to 14% between 1986 and
1992. Institutional ownership increased to 17% in 1993, 26% in 1994 and 30% in
1995.37
Crain, Cudd and Brown (2000) studied the increased REIT ownership by
institutional investors specifically as the increased ownership relates to
unsystematic risk. Their theory is that unsystematic (idiosyncratic) risk, which
can be removed through diversification, will become less important due to the
highly diversified nature of pension funds.38 Since systematic risk can be
removed through diversification, it should become less important in the pricing of
equity REITs. They found strong empirical evidence that after enactment of the
1993 Act, the risk structure of equity REIT pricing changed significantly.
Unsystematic risk represents variations in equity REIT returns unexplained by
movement in the market index (S&P 500). Their study results indicate that since
the 1993 Act the role of unsystematic risk in explaining equity REIT returns
declined significantly over time,39 the same corresponding time period as the
increase in institutional ownership.
36 Liang, Chatrath and McIntosh, "Apartment REITs and Apartment Real Estate", [1996].37 Chan, Leung and Wang, "Institutional Investment in REITs: Evidence and Implications", [1998].38 Crain, Cudd and Brown, "The Impact of Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 on the Pricing Structure ofEquity REITs", [2000].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 28
Fields, Rangan and Thiagarjan (1998) conducted research directly applicable to
FFO growth as it relates to market capitalization. Fields et al. compared net
income and FFO to help explain contemporaneous REIT pricing and annual stock
returns. Since previous research has indicated that price should be expressed as a
linear function of net income, book value and dividends, Fields et al. used end of
year book value of equity and dividends, in addition to net income and FFO, as
explanatory variables for stock prices. Using regression analysis, Fields et al.
found that net income has more explanatory power for stock returns than does
FFO. Moreover, net income explained 61% of the variation in price compared to
FFO, which explained approximately 57.8% of the variation in price. However,
the results were not statistically significant. They concluded that net income only
marginally explains equity REIT prices better than FF. 40
2.2 Empirical Data Sources
The U.S. Census Bureau was the primary source for market data, such as rent growth,
employment growth and stock growth (which was calculated from permit data).
These data are considered extremely reliable because they are comparable across
markets and comprehensive of the conditions within the market. The figures
comprise the entire rental stock, not just one structure type or quality grade. Housing
construction data, as measured by building permits by size of structure, are also
available from the Census Bureau. Since over 80% of all multi-family, construction
is built for rental occupancy, multi-family permits are a good indicator of additions to
39 Ibid.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 29
the apartment stock.4 1 The estimates of rents, vacancies, and construction are
generated using large, scientifically drawn samples and therefore considered very
accurate.42
The great extent to which publicly available rental housing data exists is both a
strength and a weakness. Metropolitan areas are comprised of various, diverse sub-
markets, and metro averages smooth through that diversity. Additionally, rental
housing includes not only large properties, but also single-family home rentals and
small multi-family properties. These smaller properties often perform differently
than larger, institutional properties, which can affect the data and essentially
"average" out the diversity. 43
Data was also obtained from National Real Estate Index ("NREI"), a provider of real
estate/economic research. NREI's publications analyze commercial real estate trends
and demographic changes in over 50 metropolitan markets throughout North
America. NREI's proprietary database also provides quarterly prices, rents and cap
rates for the office, industrial, retail, and apartment sectors at the metropolitan,
regional and national levels.
NREI's apartment rent data is gathered directly from apartment owners and managers
in 58 metropolitan markets, as well as appraisers, brokers and institutional advisors.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT PerformanceI
40 Fields, Rangan and Thiagarajan, "An Empirical Evaluation of the Usefulness of Non-GAAP AccountingMeasures in the Real Estate Investment Trust Industry", [1998].41 Goodman, "Performance Across Local Apartment Markets", [1999].42 Ibid.
30
The rents include both Class A and B-rated properties. NREI defines Class B
properties as those built or substantively renovated between 1980 and 1988.
Additionally, the prototypical apartments NREI tracks are typically garden-style or
campus-style, ranging from 100-300 units per property and maintaining a certain
standard of appearance and amenities appropriate for the geographic region.
Much of the REIT-specific data (geographic concentration, revenue, NOI, FFO, units
owned, interest expense, market share, etc.) were obtained from SNL DataSource, a
fee-based service provider that tracks and researches corporate information in
financial services, real estate and energy industries. Through an MIT subscription
agreement, the SNL DataSource Real Estate Securities Module provided detailed
geographic information on all owned-properties in which an applicable apartment
REIT has an equity interest as well as all pertinent financial data, such as rental
revenue, rental NOI, FFO, net income, market capitalization and CAP rate. SNL
obtains all REIT data from either SEC public documents or directly from a REIT's
published literature.
2.3 Informational Interviews
Having completed the initial literature review, interviews with academics were
conducted to better understand the optimal dependent and independent variables
required for the regression analysis. Moreover, these interviews helped to better
organize the databases for regression analyses, resulting in the most efficient method
for empirical analysis. Once initial regression analyses were produced, additional
43 Ibid.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 31
academic interviews yielded more independent variables, in hopes of generating
stronger results. These additional interviews were critical as they strengthened the
thesis core. Perhaps the main benefit of the academic interviews was the additional
data source suggestions, which facilitated the data collection efforts. Through these
data source suggestions, contacts at source providers were gained, providing access to
data that was otherwise thought to be unattainable within the time constraints of this
thesis.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 32
3.0 Discussion of Variables
3.1 Components of Market Fundamentals
From the literature review and academic interviews, the important components of
market fundamentals and REIT financial performance were determined for the
empirical analysis. The components of market fundamentals are:
1. Weighted average rent growth
2. Weighted average stock growth
3. Weighted average employment growth
4. Weighted average excess demand growth
5. Percent change in apartments
6. Percent of portfolio in MSA
A short explanation of each component follows:
Weighted Average Rent Growth (WARG)
Rental growth represents the annual percent change in rental units for U.S. markets.
Weighted average rent growth was calculated by multiplying each REIT's portfolio
concentration (number of units in each MSA divided by the total number of units in
the portfolio) by the percent change in rent growth for that MSA from the previous
year. Summing up the results for each REIT equals the weighted average rent
growth. WARG was calculated with two different sets of market rent data -
government and NREI data - in order to fill gaps where data were missing.
Government - Weighted Average Rent Growth
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 33
Government - WARG was calculated by multiplying the REIT's portfolio
concentration by the percent change in rent for a given MSA (given government
rent data). If the government data lacked information on the MSA, NREI rent
data were used. If the NREI rent data lacked information on the MSA, the
national rent average was used. As previously discussed, the government data
includes all units rented in the U.S. regardless of size. It is obtained through U.S.
Census Bureau Survey.
NREI- WeightedAverage Rent Growth
NREI - WARG was calculated by multiplying the REIT's portfolio concentration
by the percent change in rent for a given MSA (given NREI rent data) If the
NREI data lacked information about the MSA, government rent data were used.
If the government data lacked information on the MSA, the national rent average
was used. Again, NREI data focuses on larger, institutionally owned class A and
B properties and obtains data directly from property owners, appraisers and
pension funds.
Weighted Average Stock Growth (WASG)
Stock growth represents the annual change in units available for rent. Weighted
average stock growth was calculated by first constructing the historical stock growth
for 57 MSAs (identified in Appendix 1) by taking the number of"renter-occupied
housing units" as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in 1990 and adding permits
(1990 - 1999) to the respective MSA's stock number. For example, the number of
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 34
renter-occupied housing units for a certain MSA in 1991 was calculated by adding the
number of renter-occupied housing units in 1990 to the number of multi-family
permits issued in 1990. This process was repeated through 2000. After calculating
the percent change in stock growth from year to year, that number was multiplied by
each REIT's portfolio concentration. Where stock growth was not available for an
MSA, the national stock growth minus the sum of the stock growth for the 57 MSAs
that had stock growth information was used. Summing up the product of stock
growth and portfolio concentration for each REIT produced the WASG.
Weighted Average Employment Growth (WAEG)
Employment growth measures the change in number ofjobs for a specific MSA.
Weighted average employment growth was calculated by multiplying the REIT's
portfolio concentration by the growth in employment for each MSA. Where
employment growth was missing for an MSA, the national employment growth minus
the sum of the 57 MSAs that had employment growth information was used.
Summing the product of employment and portfolio concentration for each REIT
produced the WAEG.
Weighted Average Excess Demand (WAED)
This variable measures the extent to which employment is growing faster or slower
than stock in each MSA where market data was available. Weighted average excess
demand was calculated by taking the difference between the weighted average
employment growth and weighted average stock growth.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 35
Percent Change in Apartments
As discussed in Chapter 3.2, the dependent variables were calculated using per unit
growth. Per unit values were used to compare REITs on an "apples to apples" basis.
One problem with the per unit calculations though is the accounting method
employed by REITs for newly acquired or disposed properties. For example,
properties that were acquired in the second half of the calendar year were included in
the per unit calculation if the units were still in the portfolio at year-end. However,
the operating results associated with newly acquired units were only for a short stub
period, therefore understating that REITs' data, particularly during a high acquisition
period.
To help smooth the volatility caused by this accounting issue, the independent
variable "Percent Change in Apartments" was added. This variable was added to all
regressions in order help offset the effects of the per unit data aberrations. The
percent change in apartments variable was calculated by taking the difference in the
number of apartments each REIT held in its portfolio between year 2 and year 1 and
dividing that result by the number of apartments in year 1. This was done for five
years, 1996 - 2000.
Percent of Portfolio in MSA
As indicated in Chapter 4.2, Exhibit 5, government and NREI rent data was obtained
for 57 MSAs for a five-year period. However, rent data were unavailable for markets
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 36
outside the 57 MSAs in certain years. In those instances, national rent data were used
as a substitution. In order to offset the possible effects of too many national data
entries, the independent variable "Percent of Portfolio in MSA" was calculated. For
each apartment REIT portfolio in the pool (see Chapter 4.1 Exhibit 4) the total
number of apartments in the 57 MSAs (Exhibit 5) was calculated. This number was
then divided by the total number of apartments in the corresponding REIT's portfolio.
The result is the concentration of a REIT's portfolio in MSAs where rent data were
available.
An additional measure was undertaken to negate the possible influence of national
data. The ten REITs with the greatest concentration of units in MSAs for which we
had government data were calculated and used in a regression analysis to verify the
construction accuracy of the government data. This was used as a test to try and
eliminate the noise of REITs with high concentrations of units in MSAs where
government rent data did not exist.
3.2 Components of REIT Financial Performance
The measures of REIT financial performance are:
1. Percent change in rental revenue per unit
2. Percent change in rental net operating income per unit
3. Percent change in funds from operations per unit
4. Percent change in net income per unit
5. Percent change in market capitalization per unit
6. CAP rate
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 37
Percentage Change in Rental Revenue per Unit
Rental revenue data was collected from SNL DataSource, which obtained the data
from company SEC filing documents. The percentage change was calculated year-to-
year for a five-year period (1996 - 2000). Rental revenue is a significant financial
measure of apartment REITs because it represents the revenue generated solely by
real estate assets and excludes "other income" such as furniture rental, utility bill
backs, laundry, etc. By excluding all other non-real estate revenue, the real estate
revenue is isolated, providing a better analysis when compared to rent growth data.
In order to properly compare the REITs on an equal basis, percentage change in rental
revenue per unit was used as a component of REIT financial performance.
Comparing REIT performance on an absolute basis (i.e., not on a per unit basis) is
misleading and non-informative because the results of highly acquisitive REITs will
show abnormal absolute growth. Note that for all per unit calculations, unit
information was obtained from SNL DataSource and crosschecked against annual
reports. Immaterial differences existed in certain instances, which can be explained
by the criteria for determining actual units in a REIT's portfolio for a given year.
These criteria are defined as follows: in order for a unit to be considered part of a
REIT's portfolio, the REIT had to own the unit as of December 31 t of a given year.
This implies that units under construction as of December 3 1st were included while
assets sold anytime before December 3 t were excluded.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 38
Percentage Change in Rental Net Operating Income per Unit
Rental net operating income was also collected from SNL DataSource. The
percentage change was calculated in a similar method to rental revenue, over the
same five-year period. Rental net operating income ("Rental NOI") is defined as
rental revenue from real estate assets less all real estate-related expenses, including
tenant improvements, leasing commissions and revenues but excludes financing
costs. Rental NOI is the cash flow available to service the debt. This is a significant
financial measure because many real estate properties are valued by applying a
capitalization rate to the rental NOI to derive a property valuation. Additionally,
since the NOI reflects the cash flow available for financing which is property specific,
it can be a useful measure to compare properties, particularly on a per unit basis. As
was the case with rental revenue, it is necessary to compare the REITs on an "apples
to apples basis". Therefore, percentage change in NOI is calculated on a per unit
basis.
FFO per Unit
Funds from operations ("FFO") is perhaps one of the most widely used measures of
financial performance by industry analysts. FFO is net income (as measured by
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), excluding gains or losses from sales of
properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.44 Heavily endorsed by NAREIT,
FFO was created to become a "standard supplemental measure of REIT operating
performance that excluded historical cost depreciation from - or "added it back" - to
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 39
GAAP net income."4 5 FFO was intended to allow the prices of various REIT stocks
to be compared with each other and in terms of the relationship between REIT stock
prices and FFO. Thus, FFO was to be used for determining a capitalization multiple
similar to a P/E ratio.46 Perhaps the biggest argument for using FFO as a performance
measure is that real estate, unlike other assets, doesn't depreciate predictably over
time and certainly not as quickly as GAAP accounting implies. A building might
take 70 or 80 years to become fully obsolete, not the 30 or 40 years allowed by
GAAP.47 Due to the importance placed on FFO by industry observers, FFO is an
integral measure in the empirical analysis. FFO data were obtained from SNL
DataSource.
The percentage change is used since it is the growth in FFO that is being isolated.
This percentage change is calculated on a per unit basis in order to properly compare
each REIT on a "level playing field". Additionally, calculations on a per unit basis
help negate the effects of mergers or industry consolidation (discussed in chapter 4.1).
Net Income per Unit
As discussed in Chapter 2.1, a shift among industry analysts has occurred favoring
the use of net income over FFO. Due to this shift in analyst sentiment by major Wall
Street research firms, net income is included in the empirical analysis as a dependent
variable. Net income figures were obtained from SNL DataSource for five years
(1996 - 2000). Many industry observers favor net income because it represents
44 NAREIT, "White Paper on Funds from Operations", [1999].45 Ibid.46 Ibid.47 Ibid.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 40
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and properly matches income and
expenses, a fundamental accounting rule. The net income used in this analysis is after
extraordinary items and gains on sales.
As previously discussed, a per unit basis of net income is the appropriate measure
used to compare REITs in this study because it "levels the playing field".
Market Capitalization per unit
Market capitalization equals the share price multiplied by the number of shares
outstanding, for a respective year. Using SNL DataSource, historical market
capitalization information was obtained. Using six years of data, the percent change
in market capitalization was calculated for five years (with the exception of Roberts
Realty and Cornerstone Income Realty Trust, in which only three years of data was
available so only two years of percentage change information was calculated.)
Market capitalization per unit is used because it reflects how the stock market values
the equity of the company.
Cap Rate
As a measure of a REITs portfolio's yield potential, cap rate was calculated by
dividing rental NOI by the market capitalization for each respective REIT. The
objective of this test was to measure a REITs weighted average rent growth relative to
cap rate to determine the correlation.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 41
4.0 Discussion of Statistical Sample and Markets
4.1 Statistical Sample- REITs
The initial database included all equity residential REITs in existence as of December
31, 2000. From this sample, several REITs were excluded because dependent
variable data were not available or consistent with apartment data. For example, all
manufactured home REITs were excluded from the sample since manufactured home
rental/revenue characteristics are different from apartment characteristics and data is
difficult to obtain for the product. Presidential Realty Corp. was also excluded since
it is a hybrid REIT (not exclusively equity).
It is important to note that the apartment industry has experienced significant
consolidation over the past few years. Among the REITs studied that have
experienced consolidation over the last five years are:
* Avalon Communities and Bay Apartment Communities, consolidated into
AvalonBay (AVB) in June 1998;
* Merry Land Investments Inc. was acquired by Equity Residential Trust in 1999;
* Security Capital Pacific Trust and Security Capital Atlantic Inc. merged into
Archstone Communities Trust in 1999.
Where two apartment REITs merged in the middle of a calendar year, the target's
operating results (Rental Revenue, Rental NOI, FFO, Net Income, and Market Cap)
and total number of apartments held were added to those of the acquirer's in that
calendar year, providing for seamless results over the five year period (1996 - 2000).
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 42
Several REITs have also de-REITed recently due to either low stock valuations, the
inflexibility of the REIT tax structure, increasing liquidity of the private real estate
markets or a strong desire to return to private status to avoid the pressures of being a
public company. Some examples of these in the apartment industry which were
excluded from the pool were:
* Irvine Apartment Communities Inc. was privatized in 1999.
* Berkshire Realty Company was taken private in 1999 by an alliance of its
management team, a Goldman Sachs real estate equity fund, and the Blackstone
Group, a financial advisor and global real estate investor.
Where apartment REITs broke-up or de-REITed in the middle of a calendar year, the
target's operating results (Rental Revenue, Rental NOI, FFO, Net Income, and
Market Cap) and total number of apartments held were subtracted from those of the
acquirer's in that calendar year, providing for seamless results over the five year
period (1996 - 2000).
In May 2001, Archstone Communities and Charles E. Smith announced a merger
creating one of the largest apartment REITs in the U.S.. Due to the timing of the
merger (post December 31, 2000), the two REITs remain in the sample pool as
separate entities.
The final REIT sample consists of nineteen equity apartment REITs listed below,
whose portfolios contain at least 90% apartments:
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 43
Exhibit 4
Apartment REIT Ticker1 Associated Estates Realty Corporation AEC2 Apartment Investment & Mgmt. Co. AIV3 AMLI Residential Properties Trust AML4 Archstone Communities Trust ASN5 AvalonBay Communities Inc. AVB6 BRE Properties, Inc. BRE7 Camden Property Trust CPT8 Equity Residential Properties Trust EQR9 Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS10 Gables Residential Trust GBP11 Home Properties of New York, Inc. HME12 Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. MAA13 Post Properties, Inc. PPS14 Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. RPI15 Summit Properties Inc. SMT16 Charles E. Smith Residential Realty SRW17 Cornerstone Realty Income Trust TCR18 Town and Country Trust, The TCT19 United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. UDRSource: Constituent Companies and Relative Weights in theNAREIT Real-Time Index for July 7, 2001
4.2 Statistical Data - Markets
Torto Wheaton Research provided market data (i.e. employment growth, permits, and
rent growth) on 57 MSAs (see Appendix 1). Employment growth, in MSAs where
data were not readily available, was calculated by taking the difference between the
National employment growth and sum of employment growth in the 57 MSAs. These
calculated data were used as a proxy for employment growth for all MSAs outside of
the 57 where Torto Wheaton Research provided information. Permit data for MSAs
outside of the 57 MSAs were calculated in the same fashion.
Rent growth was calculated following two different procedures as outlined in Chapter
3.1. The following table highlights the MSAs where government and NREI data
were used. For markets that lacked both government and NREI rent data, the
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 44
National average was used as a rent growth proxy. Note that an "x" denotes data
obtained.
Exhibit 5
MSA YearI ALBUQUERQUE 1995
19961997199819992000
2 ATLANTA 199519961997199819992000
3 AUSTIN 199519961997199819992000
4 BAKERSFIELD 199519961997199819992000
5 BALTIMORE 199519961997199819992000
6 BOSTON 199519961997199819992000
7 CHICAGO 199519961997199819992000
8 CHARLOTTE 199519961997199819992000
GOV'TRENT
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX .X
NREIRENT
XXXXX
XXXXX
XxXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXx
XXXXX
MSA Year9 CINCINNATI 1995
19961997199819992000
10 CLEVELAND 199519961997199819992000
11 COLUMBUS 199519961997199819992000
12 DALLAS 199519961997199819992000
13 DENVER 199519961997199819992000
14 DETROIT 199519961997199819992000
15 FT. LAUDERDALE 199519961997199819992000
16 FT. WORTH 199519961997199819992000
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
NREIRENT
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
xXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
GOV'TRENT
XXXXXXXXXxXX
XXXx
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXX
45
MSA Year17 FRESNO 1995
19961997199819992000
18 HARTFORD 199519961997199819992000
19 HONOLULU 199519961997199819992000
20 HOUSTON 199519961997199819992000
21 INDIANAPOLIS 199519961997199819992000
22 JACKSON 199519961997199819992000
23 JERSEY CITY 199519961997199819992000
24 KANSAS CITY 199519961997199819992000
GOV'TRENT
XxXxxxxxxxxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxxxxxxxxx
xXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
NREIRENT
XXx
Xxxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxx
xXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
MSA Year25 LOS ANGELES 1995
19961997199819992000
26 LONG ISLAND 199519961997199819992000
27 LAS VEGAS 199519961997199819992000
28 MEMPHIS 199519961997199819992000
29 MIAMI 199519961997199819992000
30 MILWAUKEE 199519961997199819992000
31 MINNEAPOLIS 199519961997199819992000
32 NASHVILLE 199519961997199819992000
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
GOV'TRENT
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
NREIRENT
XXXXx
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
iI
i 1
46
MSA Year33 NEW YORK 1995
19961997199819992000
34 OAKLAND 199519961997199819992000
35 OKLAHOMA CITrY 199519961997199819992000
36 ORANGE CNTY. 199519961997199819992000
37 ORLANDO 199519961997199819992000
38 OXNARD 199519961997199819992000
39 PHILADELPHIA 199519961997199819992000
40 PHOENIX 199519961997199819992000
GOV'TRENT
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXX
NREIRENT
xXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXX
MSA Year41 PITTSBURGH 1995
19961997199819992000
42 PORTLAND 199519961997199819992000
43 RALEIGH/DURHAM 199519961997199819992000
44 RIVERSIDE 199519961997199819992000
45 SACRAMENTO 199519961997199819992000
46 SALT LAKE CITY 199519961997199819992000
47 SAN DIEGO 199519961997199819992000
48 SEATTLE 199519961997199819992000
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT PerformanceI
GOV'TRENT
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
NREIRENT
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
47
MSA Year49 SAN FRANCISCO 1995
19961997199819992000
50 SAN JOSE 199519961997199819992000
51 ST LOUIS 199519961997199819992000
52 STAMFORD 199519961997199819992000
53 TAMPA BAY 199519961997199819992000
54 TUCSON 199519961997199819992000
55 WASHINGTON D.C 199519961997199819992000
56 W. PLAM BEACH 199519961997199819992000
GOVTRENT
XXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxx
xxxxxxxxxxx
xX ,,
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
NREIRENT
XxXxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxx
xXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
X
XXXX
X
XXXX
MSA Year57 WILMINGTON 1995
19961997199819992000
58 NON 57 MSAs 199519961997199819992000
59 NATION 199519961997199819992000
GOV'TRENT
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxx
xxxx
xXXXXX
XXXXX
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
|
_I_
Ii
I
INREIRENT
48
4.3 Descriptive Statistics - Dependent Variables
The following exhibit highlights the dependent variables used to proxy for apartment
REIT returns. Of note in Exhibit 6 is AvalonBay's Rental Revenue per Unit, Rental
NOI per Unit, Percentage Change FFO per Unit and Percentage Change Net Income,
which is significantly higher relative to the other 18 apartment REITs. AvalonBay's
portfolio is significantly concentrated in markets considered to have high barrier
entries and high costs of living. Specifically, AvalonBay's 2000 portfolio is
concentrated in San Jose (12%), San Francisco (5%), Boston (5%), New York (5%),
Seattle (7%) and Washington D.C (14%). This provides anecdotal evidence that
these markets are high rent growth markets, supported by Exhibit 6, which shows that
AvalonBay has the second highest WARG given both Government and NREI data.
Exhibit 6
Statistical Summary -Dependent Vxiable
Avr s OverA Five Ye Period (1996. 2000)
% A Re l Rev per % RealNOIper % ANen Inome M .rCapper % A MrkeCapUnit Unit % A %O fpN INaer Uni per Un Ne I e Uni Ru
# REIT Ticker A SDen Av SdDev A SIDev AvA [ S dDev D- A S A SdD A SdD
I AnIoc iaedEsaresRe.icComoration AEC 3.28% 6.38% 2.09% 5.05% -11.9% 8.96% -1.4% 42.83% 6.2% 4463S 400% 0.38% -2.72% 7.30' 8.86% 1.14e
2 Ap men nvesment& Mm Co. AIV 1103% 46.39% 15.40% 46.63% 1663% 364% -0.49% 37.31 517 60.09 0.9 19.66% 4513% 5.15% 0.96%
3Am Residental Propenies AML .9.74% 11.84% -8.0% 12 -.1.46% 7.89% 17.84% 2523% 4299 26.14% 323% 0.41% -5.96% 6.51% 7.24% 0.71
4Archsione CommunidesTnu ASN 10.82% 23.75% 1330% 2457% 1437% 234% 2121% 61.91% 42.42% 80.37% 6.57% 1.55% 1004% 131% 6.69% 0.87%
5 AvanBay Communites Inc. AVB 4471% 6180% 42.37% 56.61% 40.13% 36.90% 509% 63.8B% 89.72% 77.06% 8.41% 3.79% 37.34% 41.47% 6.04% 1.08%
6BRErpenies, Inc. BRE 4.46% 16,58% 5.14% 17.23% -2.44% 2596% 1.49% 65.51% 4459% 134.37% 8.27% 0.65% 11.64% 19,88% 6.25% 1.185i
7 CamdcenPropey Trus CPT 31.86% 3071% 38.84% 38.70% 36.52% 3413% 7.09% 144. 77.85% 149.88 3.72% 1.46% 42% 351% 7.80% 0.84%
8 Equiy ResidntialPropeies Tu EOR 17.21% 30.04% 18.71% 2816% 2402% 33.89% 25.89% 21.14% 542% 12.91 .02% 1.28% 16.82% 15.88% 6.91% 1.37%
9Es-sxPrpen Tn. nc. ESS 30.08% 59.48% 31.35% 59.18 39.02% 73.32% 30.97% 48.72% 5419% 103.59 8.21% 0.82% 57.20% 119.58% 6.52% 1.01
10 Gables sdendri Trnsi GBP 6.92% 6.77% 8.60% 8.11 6.30% 7.97 19.92% 22.62% 39.09% 2099% 6.01% 0.44% 3.41% 13.10 7.69% 1.04%
1I Home Propedesof New Yori In. H-M 7.23% 17.14% 10.5% 17.57% 1034% 1.35% 19.67% 33.29 78.65% 63.95% 4.90% 0.32% 9.00% 1061% 7.06% 1.32%
12 Ml.Amei aAparmen Communies Inc. MAA 7.04% 2210% 8.18% 23.82% 3.04% 20.40 2336% 62.54% 3532% 6.59% 4.14% 0.20% 3.73% 8.22% 8.87% 1.55%
13 Pos Propenl Ile. PPS 3.99% 22.91% 438% 22.66% 4.75% 22.64% 8.53% 23.21% 30.26% 26.06% 8.32% 0.95% 2.10% 20.10% 6.56% 1.00%
14 RobensR .e ylnveios lnc. RPI 3.04% 27.94% 6.51% .30 3.07% 31.3% 4.3 6 453% 94.60% 56.51% 216.71% 5.76% 0.19 .9.99% 15.09% 8.60% 0.34%
15 SummiPropres Inc. SMT 8.10% 3.46% 1008% 3.66% 7.52% 4.43% 31.99% 41.59% 46.41% 45.50% 7.06% 0.85% 7.90% 12.41% 7.40% 0.81%
16 Charls .Smith R.sidential Rady SRW 3.80% 9.75% 5.36% 10.92% 8.43% 1Z.73 52.39% 426% 79.00% 5449% 8.60% 1.27% 7.97% 1476% 7.39% 0.40%
17 Cometon Reiy nom Trusl TCR 8.79% 35.49% 9.74% 35.76% -7.84% 47.84% -80.37% 213.37 -119.42% 267.32% 413% 0.914 Z.86% 25.08% 9.09% 0.97%
18 Tn and CoumryTs The TCT 444% 5.31% 467% 7.23 3.28% 6.01% 4471% 57.22% 49.34% 6.97% 4.70% 0.48% 7.06% 4.57% 9.01% 0.41
19UnldDominion Ray Tru, Inc. UDR 16.59% 19.92% 17.84% 21.13% 15.08% 2401% 1.35% 3641% 22.74% 373% 453% 0.48 177% 19.8% 845% 1.99%ToiS AdD 11.45% 12.87% 10.99% 20.67% 40.72% 5.73% 12.326% 7.43%Total S De 12.51% 12.62% 14.90% 32.63% 44.74% 1.8(0% 15.98% 1.13%
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 49
4.4 Descriptive Statistics - Independent Variables
The following exhibit highlights the independent variables used to proxy for
apartment REIT returns. Exhibit 6 illustrates the effects of market fundamentals on
REIT performance. Of note in the Exhibit is that Essex Property Trust experienced
the highest WARG in both the Government and NREI data. Essex's portfolio
concentration is primarily located on the West Coast (Long Beach and Los Angeles
20%, Seattle 20%, Oakland 15%, Orange County 15%). AvalonBay also experienced
high WARG. Similarly, AvalonBay's portfolio is heavily weighted on the West
Coast (San Jose 12%, Los Angeles 6%, San Francisco 5%, Oakland 5%, Orange
County 5%). Camden Property Trust experienced the highest employment growth
based on market concentration. The three largest markets in Camden's portfolio are
Las Vegas (20%), Dallas (15%) and Houston (13%). Charles E. Smith experienced
the highest stock growth relative to the other REITs, which contributed to it also
having the lowest WAED. Charles E. Smith is significantly weighted in the
Washington D.C./Virginia/Maryland markets (64%).
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 50a
Exhibit 7
Statistical Summay -Independmt VariablesAvemies Over A Five Year Perid (1996 -200)
Oovt WARG NREI WARG WAEG WASG WAED % Totl in MSA % D # f Apts
REIT . .Ticker Aiv{I i{~ Ii~i~er iI~ An SidDe. uA, $ AnvREff Sieker Aer | Std~ev Avr | St~ev A v StDev' StdDv Sa D- A $Dev Av dDev
I AzrciatedEstaRealtyCorporaftion AEC 2.82% 0.70% 3.96% 0.76% 1.92% 0.26% 1.17% 023%< 0.75%Y 0.43% 72.43% 2.24% 12.32% 8.92%
2 Apearnetl esment&MgmLCo. AIV 3.15% 0.40% 3.89% 0.56 6% 3.00% 0.60% 1.86°%. 0.10% 1.14% 0.60% 70.96% 5.11% 76.25% 103.65%
3 AmliR.etentlalPrtpetties. Trt AML 3.62% 0.46% 3.30% 0.74% 3.57% 021% 2.47% 0.22% 1.10% 0.34% 96.65% 1.17% 22.30% 10.26%
4 Archtne C mm..unitis Trut ASN 3.53% 0.4OA6% 3.74% 0.49Y 3.62% 0.29% 2.20% 0.13% 1.42% 0.37% 5.77% 5.14% 13.47% 23.97%
5 Aval.onBevy Commuies Inc. AVB 3.82% 0.90M 5.76% 1.26% 2.4S% 0.44% 1.51% 0.12% 0.97% 0.49% 81.68% 2.05% 20.81% 22.29%
6 BRE P wd.ertez Ic. BRE 3.55% 1.20% 4.51% 1.09% 3 5% 0.22% 1.68% 0.13% 2.17% 0.19% 96.91% 1.02% 29.46% 30.02%
7 C aden PrertyTrcat CPT 3.13% 0.51% 3.37% 0.79% 4.37% 0A.49% 2.92% 0.28%Y. 1.44% 0.4A5% 91.00% 0.69% 3.40 6.97%
8 EqnityResienti Properties Trust EQR 337%/ 0.37% 3.88°/0. OAI% 3.29% 0.34% 2.0% 0.09% 1.20%. 0.41% 78.980% 2.24% 24.56% 27.63%
9 EtexPropertyTrut Inc. ESS 4.11% 1.02% 6.22Y. 2.21% 3.16% 0.79% 124% 0.19% 1.92% 0.80% 87.73% 1.08% 16.76% 45.65%
10 OGbe, ResidentalTrust GBP 3.41% 0.32%A 3.04% . 1.1 3.78%/. 0A.45% 2.41% 0.35% 1.37%/ 0.586 97.99% 1.21% 17.75% 15.60%Y
1 Ho e Properties. fNewYork Inc. HME 3.03% 0.39% 4.37% 1.01% 2.01% 0.44% 1.02% 0.16% 0.99/. 0.57% 42.08% 20.59y 50.81% 33.51%
12 Mid.-AerAicAparmentCommunite,. Inc. MAA 3.40% 0.19% 4.03% 0.61% 2.56% 0.42% 1.57% 0.1IS% 1.00%/ 0.50% 52.80% 3.12% 14.98% 24.46%
13 Pot..Prpcetie, Inc. PPS 3.87% 0.50% 2.87% 0A.47%/ 4.15% 0.21% 2.77% 0.24"% 1.38% 0.24% 97.18% 1.66% 21.71% 2413%
14 Robert Realty nvetn, Inc. RPI! 3.43% 0.21% 2.11% 0.80% 4.18% 0.63% 2.70% 0.17% 1.47%. 0A.49 100.0% 0.00% .85%, 22.53%
15 SummitProperti Inc. SMT 3.3% 0.45 32Y 0.47 3.26% 0.33% 2.65%, 0.45Y 0.61% 0.34% 85.71% 7.08%e 11.36% 6.99Ye
16 Chades E.Smith Reidential Realy SRW 2.42% 1.13% 4.08% 1.55% 2.05% 1.07% 3.57% 0.37% -1.52% 1.14% 1I0.00% 0.00%. 17.89% 8.09%
17 Corerstne.RealtylncomeTr-st TCR 3.76% 0.45% 3.92% 0.62% 3.17% 0.46% 2.14% 0.24% 1.03%' 0.55% 62.20% 6.92% 91.17% 17421%
18 Town andCountyTrus The TCT 2.54%Y 1.01% 3.77% 0.991% 2.06% 0.89% 1.70% 0.38 % 0.36% 0.73% 77.80% 2.37% 2.36% 5.37%
19 UnidDminion RealityTrust Inc. UDR 3.32Y, 0.35% 3.87% 0.65% 3.07% 0.39% 2.00% 0.22/, 1.07% 0.53% 65.07% 3.92% 9.41% 9.10%Total Avg 3.35%Total Std Dev 0.43%
3.89% 3.13% 2.09% 1.05% S1.25%0.93% 0.7S% 0.67% 0.75% 16.73%
24.51%23.51%
51The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
5.0 Regression Results
Hypothesis #1 - weighted average employment growth and weighted average stock
growth effectively measure demand and supply growth, which should be a proxy for
weighted average rent growth.
Results: A regression analysis of WARG (given NREI and Gov't rent data) versus
WAEG and WASG resulted in statistical models that explain (see Exhibit 8):
1. 55.1% of the variance in WARG (given Gov't rent data) using a cross-sectional
data approach with 19 observations;
2. 10.5% of the variance in the WARG (given Gov't rent data) using a panel data
approach with 95 observations; however the t-stat on the WASG variable is not
significant;
3. the regression results using WARG (given NREI rent data) were not significant.
Exhibit 8
Panel Data Regression Results
Dependent Variable # of Obs Indep. Variable & Coef t-Stat R SquareWAEG WASG WAEG WASG
Govt WARG 95 0.295090251 -0.21395749 3.244325084 -1.81772392 0.105450901NREI WARG 95 -0.07772166 -0.92457699 -0.5661638 -5.2044401 0.278205674
Cross-Section Data Regression Results
Dependent Variable # of Obs Indep. Variable & Coef t-Stat R SquareWAEG WASG WAEG WASG
Govt WARG 19 0.479364224 -0.33222551 4.39489386 -2.61276007 0.551425904NREI WARG 19 -0.27577776 -0.69669975 -1.0480718 -2.27123058 0.407624388
Discussion: While the results indicate WAEG and WASG are highly correlated with
WARG, given the cross-sectional data, the results are inconclusive because the
sample size is less than 30. The Gov't WARG results also show there is a positive
correlation between WARG and WAEG and a negative correlation between WARG
and WASG. Interestingly, when using NREI rent data, the t-stats are insignificant
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 52
and the sign on the WAEG variable, in both result summaries above, is negative.
Intuition tells us that as employment grows in a market, rent growth in that market
should be positive, not negative.
The results do not show conclusive evidence to support hypothesis#l.
Hypothesis #2 - weighted average rent growth should determine Net Income and FFO /
NOI growth.
Results: A regression analysis of the variables described in Chapter 3.0 resulted in
statistical models (see Exhibits 9, 10, 11), with significant t-stats, which explain:
1. 37.1% of the variance in the percent change in FFO per unit across the sample of
selected apartment REITs using a panel data approach given NREI WARG and
apartment growth;
2. 26.4% of the variance in the percent change in FFO per unit across the sample of
selected apartment REITs using a cross-sectional data approach given NREI
WARG;
3. 32.1% of the variance in the percent change in Rental Revenue per unit across the
sample of selected apartment REITs using a panel data approach given NREI
WARG and apartment growth;
4. 3 7.0% of the variance in the percent change in Rental Revenue per unit across the
sample of selected apartment REITs using a cross-sectional data approach NREI
WARG;
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance___53
5. 31.2% of the variance in the percent change in Rental Net Operating Income per
unit across the sample of selected apartment REITs using a panel data approach
given NREI WARG and apartment growth;
6. 29.0% of the variance in the percent change in Rental Net Operating Income per
unit across the sample of selected apartment REITs using a cross-sectional data
approach given NREI WARG;
Exhibit 9
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Panel Data Regression Results Excludiog % Change in Apartments
Dependent Variable # of Obs I ndependent Variable & Coefficient t-Stat R SquareWARG WARG WARG WARG(Govt) (NREI) WAEG WASG WAED (Govt) (NREI) WAEG WASG WAED
% A in FFO per Unit 94 0.589 0.135 0.0002% A in FFO per Unit 94 7241 2.983 0.0882% A in FFO per Unit 94 3.767 1.057 0.0120% A in FFO per Unit 94 -1.203 -0.259 0.0007% A in FFO per Unit 94 4.513 1.266 0.0171% A in Rental Revenue per Unit 94 3.394 0.810 0.0071% A in Rental Revenue per Unit 94 6.420 2.728 0.0748% A in Rental Revenue per Unit 94 1.987 0.577 0.0036% A in Rental Revenue per Unit 94 -3.945 -0.888 0.0085% A in Rental Revenue per Unit 94 4.371 1.275 0.0174% A in NOI per Unit 94 3.233 0.772 0.0064% A in NOI per Unit 94 5.823 2.460 - 0.0617% A in NOI per Unit 94 2.760 0.804 0.0070% A in NOI per Unit 94 -2.809 -0.632 0.0043% A in NOI per Unit 94 4.467 1.304 0.0182% A in Net Income per Unit 93 -14.853 -1.335 0.0192% A in Net Income per Unit 93 7.642 1.159 0.0145% A in Net Income per Unit 93 6.007 0.653 0.0047% in Net Income per Unit 93 15.776 1.334 0.0192% A in Net Income per Unit 93 -3.428 -0.371 0.0015Net Income per Unit 93 49.728 3.225 0.1026Net Income per Unit 93 7.642 0.797 0.0069Net Inome per Unit 93 22.510 1.711 0.0312Net Income per Unit 93 28.979 1.702 0.0309Net Income per Unit 93 5.230 0.391 0.0017% A in Market Cop per Unit 91 -2.881 -0.566 0.0036% A in Market Cap per Unit 91 13.800 5.303 02401% A in Market Cap per Unit 91 2.563 0.621 0.0043% A in Mttket Cap per Unit 91 -7.731 -1.463 0.0235% A in Mirket CaP per Unit 91 7.220 1.772 0.0341Market Cap per Unit 91 0.945 3.146 0.1001Market Cap per Unit 91 0.254 1.383 0.0210Maket Cap per Unit 91 0.121 0.473 0.0025Murket Cap per Unit 91 0.499 1.522 0.0254Market Cap per Unit 91 -0.178 -0.693 0.0054Cap Rate 91 -0.222 -1.055 0.0124Cap Rate 91 -0.412 -3.556 0.1244Cap Rate 91 -0.388 -2.329 0.0574
Cap Rate 91 0.230 1.044 0.0121Cap Rte 91 -0.528 -3.248 0.1060
54
Exhibit 10
.... ..l... . ... ... I. . . . . .. . . . . ... . . .. . . . . .. . . I. . . .. .. .. . . . ............. I. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ..s. I. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . .P...I D.. R........ R... t. -ciur . Ch.. i, Ap-tment.roAb. - i : .pd- Vmbl. & cmT t S:., P
WAJOG WAR D V.Dit %Pontin WARG WARG : Dn #:%P.rtnW(Gln) (IeiS WAR: WASG WARD Al. MSA (G-nt) R EI): WAEG WASG WAED Apt MSA
'~.4.~ .. 9ooo~.=....~ .............. 94 0 07306 : 0.280607: 0 004216 .523044 029551.................. .............. ' ...................... . . . ..... ....... ........... . . . . . ...............................................................................-........ 6. . 5~5%A~~~p~~Un .94 05509197 0291218 0069762 0046855 44920 0492324 023267554~~~~~:.514428:-0 0234 Dg~??A~....... .......... . /i io ' ......... ......................'6i g s ''.......... ......... ~9~~ ............................ ~ ~9i ..... ' 6' 6%~ Al FF0 pe Un94 9.321918068 .06104973 -342 308'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~./:. .. ... . . . . .. ... .......,. ~... ...: ....... .......... ........ .
%A FP0 per Unit 94 {9 3610855: -0.315202 0.0592776 4.469442 -6.12182: 0.379227 0.37188575
% A. i~n FF. ~er Uit 94 : 6: g. 0642680-7.509092: ,[ - 0 300090: 0 : ,~ . .7900991 1 720373 -55364; 0.26733029%Ain FF9 pnn Unit 94 60470205287160913 0.26611
. 'i; ................. 4 ......... . ..... 0 1 - . . ........ - 02702":363, .0. .......... 7 'F: .ARNIM%A nFFO p~~~~~y0,inil 94 ~~~~10,977743Ap 6.82003.265943 03297 .473799.244711.46933 61566402' 041445106
[ % b in FFO -= Unit 94 11 567921 00738564 5 5895405 -0.337327 0246314 4992123 20276030 1 001105 667708 -1.23346 0.4246806610/ i Rm66 Rnnnnunp p! nt.9 4 321194165:0530.0353.0103 020674% A n Kenti Revenuenper Unit 94 37367317: -0.274184i -021041 0 9917177i -5.001851 1.319851 022311459
% A In Rental Reenue J~et Unit 94 ; 0197360 : .0286930 3996867 .- 742786 0.3209424% A in 9ett~~~~ Rnnnntunpet Unit 94 79703246 0293029 0094307 30695939 14460 -0604100 0323604009-4--0-7. :-3 895939
..4. 4040144.......... . .... :-0275492 .... 1 4676862 26096 ............5 7 0
~'X'~G, ii'i/;~,~[;b'.i; .............. ~[ ........... ! ........... i .......... i . . . . . .. ..!' ....... :.........'.'...'...:.................... ............inn. p&Uiiil . ~~~~~~~~~94 .167376. 2600 2.0147004' .5106537: 0.23002083%Ain9.nit~~~~l~nnnnun p~~~Uno . 94 10243203 45580555 9100332 0274847 0261171 03073314 2069244 5140202 0245899.O.19.603P. .0.27047 6
94 13074952: 5 2505763 *7.145037: -0.28393 0161205 0350226 1452063 1370502 .5.174041i -0.747642 0.25009649001 . 94 00~~~~~8 3411455354 849 091 62971520 -63904 56698 0343020
;,A i [. R.;,.n'i J',it 94 . .. 3802804 70183202 2.6027061 . 0,361683 -0.311466 :3.9172069i21664576 04071759 -6.092957 1543772 036120196% A i NOi pi Unt 94 3.0486319i -0260412. 0 14421. .4 9D6431. 021429325
%.n.in ...OI.p.... . ...nt .................3.516036 : -I0276306.0 194701 00361916 -50.296.10472 022627325An.569!.p99.Uatt 94 76106610 -60288804 .68923 i~:. 47003: 0.3163100v:..a.J.".N.°!.P.*.r..U**n!! . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ........... .. ....... ' ......... .. iiii ...................... ..... ........ ~ ~ii'................. "'i'' ....................... ............ i ~ ~i~............. 6 ii&NI2I pet Unit 94 74214592 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.294509: 0079007 35435 620 502874 031349900
.AnN.O.I Unit 94.6299954.0273366.......... 20686673.5.200 .567 0.24419209......... ~........... ~ ............. ,....... ....90.¥.. -.D,73.1.6i
......V.6 in Noipno~~~~nit .94 07540400 51505000 0400437 0277377 00920676 148193 1099446 5213103898 024993522292554979
%,';, in,'i01 pet Uit~... ...... 94 ..... 219i232} 59293276' 6i270794-. ..... -0'2933........ ' 34964932~ 1:9005065' 0-o200654.....i :5:86873 ...... 06276V.Ai inNO)!penrUnt 94 73693409:03102309 096035071 02763607. 0 40281 26133900i23799010 01665910, 50651066 -107015 039180602
'.:mNp Unit . .........9 150137: ... ... .... .0.37921 .. ...-1392241 6.:.........'.63.~.9 , .. 006103279
% i Nt nm cp it93 1651049: : : -033152:060450721 1526033 -2.095503 1.261733 0.09799177:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::" :'¢:~ ¥::: ... :.::...:.........T.:/ .:..:....::.::::.:::.:......:::.I..::.::::... :: : :::..:..:....:::::.:.....'..'....~(.%..in.iN.nmcp.Unit. .... 93 : 11516368 ' , .036269; 0 702478 0 17698240: : - ,92297 13930089 0 10521060
................................. . . . . . . . . , ........ .94 0........... . ..................... .....................
.. ... . .... ... . .. J. ......... ~..u..... ..... ..... .. .. .P5 P~~~~~A ..... ... . 9. : !.... .e.. ......... .0 I. '- 8611 ...~...~. ..~..~. .~. . ... .... . ... -.:o...~. . ..... ..... . 1.:L,~5. .. ....... o./.?........ . ....... I I.-.2.1~ ?.......o.....! '% A NOI U~~~~k 94 .21 2015.9357 604786382 -378 208902091 2032 0032% An* ~.l~oapR~p~o.V~n~i0, . 93 0950974a037555 000 0023548 .. 71 3006 26¶4.A~~io~~inietmepto~~~nir 93 1 749 2694 75 129 09 63505 0376 0 40 1 4579 1 380723723438 04066245909807
in N n pUni 93: 177651 0.605636 6.1679586 -034237904596393 1531132 03653 0.3732622 -2.1261110.7230523 0.60030223V.6. ...NerIn~m~c~p..et. n~ .... . ... .. 93 08039035 41004203 26.1809412i . 0307508i i24507749:0.4315970 168721073 .2.519520 0.13224093
0-Jet Innome per Uit 93 49 42009 !: -049046; 32019207: i!-.24319: 0,1533807593 10710398 0539908 11381962 75244 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1,61330,0971817
,et lnininnpnUnit . .... i ..... 93' 0 ' ' ! ii472991 32056~l~303i ..... - 04i76017! 000..... } ....... .O. .. 3371 ' 1.'009970 2609'172 0090094..... .4 7
N~.eo m.pUnit......... 93 506355 : -27.20153:1435236! : -0445970 3.2072399 0....521708 1,8109543 2.07076 0.10532273
I~et lnmmc~er Un i t 93 : 240176767 3570789:55527924i
0517177i 2.278292: 0177452 27267297 ; 23323016 0 14079778,,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~.4........ ..~.. .p........ i: ........... ..........
.p.p....91 3075057 : 0340059: 0100 .0625052 71603 0.515648 016. .. 0, ...0.~.,,::,0 p.,r.: . 96:.. ... ........ 14904906 : :.00944' 6715134 . .0.7.7..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~...1:....... ... i i ~.mM.in~ tCa p.n!t........ 91 : 15 09044 5 0396130 0530024 : 6 2132~522
i: - . 96700; 03409974 037858457
VA. in cCap pet Unit 917206002 154571 00......... 1 .. .......... 7.......... '-............ ..................V.6 m66ankit~~~~~~~~~~~ap~~~~pc(10pit .~~~~~ ~ 91 .93402121-.-30016.240972057547008 01549203iiiiii 1, -0.367685 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ............ ii~~ "2~ i ....i........ .~.'6i ':.................. 2359" 0D407~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~..A....u*,.F*,. u..i...... ..............~.!.. .....:........... .. .. - .. I... .... ... .......... ....~...?.~.*...-;.!./...... ... .... ..I......I`40 7. .3s 7 1. .... .
~..A..ig..M.~k.~..C.?p.[~.9..ni7... ...91 7.772056 .9 .3982321 -1624673 1 : 390899: 1 50026: 021714249 2.977594 -3.51010: 0.19568324
........... ........... 163276 82753 023141 -0.40215 6.055725 236 409 0.04456 4. 6507 041975
M IIkt3Cap pin Uni t 90 019256737 : 7 0.012336 36.2622: i - 2.714627 001 360653i C p' ni 91082690067.................. . i ... 2 1105 ....... 27823 40107994 0270 5
MaikinCap'Un6. . ........ 91 ........ !'012956495' . . . ... i ' ' 0'014223' 16320.......562 14183.056634559..................... ...................:Mikne Cap per Unt 91 0428723 0010156 0058225: 26042489 : 6078 47032306 026041094
t Ut 91 0011204 03906602 001624 0045104 1.103690 1684547 0 05633642M(nker Ca~pe Unit 91 : i : 0105215 :0.002580 .0460260 1: -4: 1.3148 004694948/,;; ;:;';'i ............. i,~~i ...... ::'/¢"''i~!..... . . . ' ;/i' 3'/".ii'.......... ~:i½i.'.¥ii ........ 9 572 0.5117 282... 1!'7452 Y72 297 'i~ ' 2.'3~¥i~~i;;~ E;~.';J.............. ..... ......... ......... .. /.;$B.'" i i '.'di' ........... :/i '.: ...... ...... ......... : / ' B8' i ;/ ............ ~ .'i' ........... ''i'
tC,~i.~ tc ......................... ['' 1 0250112i ! ? i -0.021405i ' .300018. '} ' [ -552409 0025491906
a. i c 91 :-0353980 : 2 1 -0019773! : 3.446502 003 27 1592:48 0.3291'0?796 -0604079 -0021300 .6021939 .0042736 68426 2100923~~~~~~ 0.19413935
ap:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :":'::::":":-6 . 29740594489.....8 ............. 4..0.:307.::3821..Cap.90~~~~~.......... ...... ..041579-. -01949.204845.90206.0306493
Casp~e 0. 91 0099356 :-0434363;02759316: - 002005 : - 0524974 : -2609652 12953345 :-5030407, 020979397'a;. ... . ........... . ..........91... .0037749:; i 0305;,,": 0552495i.........':'.e -00209:8 0016.'626 -020106...,2~8 203427' 22403479~ 5307503... 311195.:/4" 0344;....06.
Ca Ai. .e aCpp ni 901 435 7.01809 1004.571 j .00351999 0033 380 1 754556670390 3755 457 1 744383
55The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Exhibit 11
Discussion: While the strength of these relationships supports the notion that
apartment REIT performance and market fundamentals are linked, other non-market
factors seem to play a more important role.
Surprisingly, NREI does a much better job of predicting apartment REIT performance
over the last five years than does the government's, whether using a cross section or
panel data approach. In fact, none of the regression results using the government rent
index yielded results that were significant. Simply using the difference between
current weighted average job growth and weighted average stock growth works better
than the government index and about half as well as the NREI. The results from the
10-REIT sample (see Appendix 16 & 17), constructed from the 10 apartment REITs
with the greatest portfolio concentration in MSAs where government rent data were
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Cross-Section-l Data Regre-sion Resuls Inciudiar . Chang in
Depndent Variable # fObf Idepndnnt Variable & Ceffiele t-Sta .R Sguare
Averg Average: Average Averg:WARG WARG Aver g Avera Aver .... ge %A#of WARG WARG Averg A.ver... g 'Av.rage i Afr(Gv,) (NREI) WAEr WASG WAZD Apts (Go-) (NREI) WAEG WASG WAZD Ap
Ave% n FOperUfit " 19.28894 0 1.1590649: : . 0.07312066
Avege%A i F0 perUvit 19 10.70475i .0055549 13188946 -1.033601 0.131662513;v;R;'%' g ,iA'~fn&' FF,9, L t , ,,,,,.................. ........ !' ........... ....................... ...... ................ ........... ....... ..
i.A .v.ae.%.. e.U 19.8..........,.r. .......................... . .... ........... 2... .......... .......... 63 4
Av'~~ e~ A~i F'*O' L-rLl't'
...................... . . ..... ...... :. . .... I . ........ . .[35 '51 ;. .... 2' .......... . 0{ ~ 2 .. ......... . .. .. ....... ! 0 {2 7 ;.'1..2 ... .. ......;i 1'7 0{5r$ 18Arerg V..inFF9.pr.Unit . t9 362933 3.049902: 06780335 .0 48835. . .0087
.Av.enA...in.FFO Enr.U i t...........19 4226658 0,7190787[ 0.0295183~Aege%A On pUnit 19 ' 3.57ts485 .3913124: -0.131624 0 660207 -0.611624 , .0.819147 007.61183sv re~l~eFF~o~p~u..... .. *----- ............................. '.,............ 2........... -........................ ,A ' PY '........... 'M ! ;" ;, :Avere.% A i PFO per Unit . 19 3.6900497 0.130005 0.7672427 .0.49727 0.07142247Avetg~sainSentI~rvenu ,, , ,,,,, A !.9~ os . e 9.02066s: : 13052639 : :1: 0.09108199A,~?.~ ~ ~.i3...mr..R.?.?: u ..(......... ......... ... ?..~ 2.a !........... .................. ...........1 . 0 9 : i " : : . 0 ' 18Average .A R.enta RRevenue per Urit 19 20 662 0374204
i8 0 0'0 i ........... ............ !'i i 6' il.................. .......... ............ ! ............... .0.... 4'.:..Avnese % A itn Rental Renue per Unit 19 2 : 24270493 542683 ' 05501246 -1.05422i 0.061454
AveraRge% A Rentl Rvenur pet Unt 19 3.4970428' 0.8815719 0.04371725
Avere% A in O peU Unit . . .t9 2537087::- 12201616: : .052414Average .% A NOI par Unit 19 73266137: 2.6360821: 0.2904666
!Average';';.'&'n~oI'per'Unit........... . i .......... '.~26~........... ...... i......?2 ~ 8 1 2
............ i..:...... 0 94i6AYte % nN9 ,tUnit , 9 j 7 3.3808647 46512 , 0.7261 0891098 0.0554171
Av... .% n N01 per Unit 19 3 8339669 962127 0.65164019;,';~¥~'i';'~ [;;;~,~ ............. ........ .... :"~............ ........... ..... .......... "...:''a' ........:i"'..... 'i..........' ........ 1 "'...... .''' qp~N.... .. ;i'aAap nAn~,,eruNet 1nme Uni 1w .... t 9 -17.,673,8 09980e3: : 0.05522427.*x~,Jmsi?.~..~n.NL.m..~p..u~n.it 1 i~~6+, ....... , ..l~-..?ai ......... ............... ......... i ................... :° ~~.!- ..... ........... ............. o...iss4..i?AveageV.A mA Net I.ne p Un.t 19 1203966 0.1396044: 0 00114512
Av er% n Netn epe ,Un~it,,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,19 , - ,,,,,,,j,3,290065 15042947 , ,,, ,,,,,,, -0293734 11269567 0.0778622Avaze At ANe ine. pr Unit 19 7224762 0699336 0.02796435Average Nt Income per Unit .,,,,, 19 85949595 : 1.9652478! 0.18512905
Aveagrk~rtlneamaper Unit 19 30156269 14402167 010874488A, lte 'e''n tn¢p Ini...................... 9...... . . '11' 29' ......... .... .. :I.......... ........... ........ ?i4t2 6:/i... ......... ..... ........ 01 '74 8
AveangeNettnome per Unit 19 0 it8809603 70979659 : : 0620488 001964773 0.0421890
Av.a.eNat I...ty p Uvit 19 10 1361 0 3656983 0.007B0538A nv. Aa ge% inMtket~sE ppeU n ,,,,,,,,,, 19 3033t,;,,;,; ,1 572570; --TT-- 0.12699544;,';~;,,;'~:~i~_a;'~'~'~;; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~............. ........ ~~.... .'ii ;;;''......... a;Average % A n Market Cap per Unit 19 13514141 .00374 , 09559911
,veae% IA in Maet Cap pa Unit 19 [26721842 -802562 04905755 -1239369 0.0883275
AvrtagrV. A in Market CapperUnit 09 ' - i ii447926 0896679 0.04506296Ayrra eMakC pr tt. 19 13031238: 0.. 2631.i894 , ' ' 008580758Aveage Mkt CC p Un.t 19 :0 7514677 '16052377 0.13162466Avtage Urket UE p09 U0t1 9 1 : 0 !15389 0443399 ' : 0 0171912 05556749 0.0259222i';, ~; ;;,~ ~ ~,':,;., ~(i: .................. ..... " ~:. .........:. ........... ........... ............ ':':a' ................. : ........... : ............. ........... f:::'''":... ::a::;~vRae Merke CaP PD Unit 19 -0142028 , 0.233259 0.00319037
Avt~~pete 9 .0 940082: 0 -158872: 0.12647413.. .. . .... .. . .. . I. . . .. .. . I~ . .. . . .... . . .'::.'',.t,, ................... |..o..........'...'.'...... ........... t ":6:,' ....................... ' ..................................... ..................................................Ava.ge C.p Ra .te 19 0 4 592 -1 726632 0.04920279
Ayrecse,,C~p,~tr , ,,,,0,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,, ,,,,,,,t9 ,,, ,,, ,,, , -0375496 0 3276645 .0956913 0 7023919 ' 00584684q CrgeCap Rt 19 '03593052 0.05771951
56
available, show that the failure of the government index to work has more to do with
the index than the coverage.
A Review of Statistically Significant Variables
NREI - Weighted Average Rent Growth (WARG)
The regression results show that the NREI - WARG, when using either a cross
section or panel data approach, does the best job of predicting FFO, Rental
Revenue, Net Operating Income, and Market Capitalization.
The intuition behind these results is straightforward. FFO, Rental Revenue, and
NOI all grow according to what rents are doing in markets where REITs own
properties. REITs that have a high portfolio concentration in markets where rents
are growing rapidly will show strong FFO, Rental Revenue, and NOI growth. We
postulate that the NREI data does a better job of predicting apartment REIT
performance over the last five years than does the government's because of the
differences in how indices are constructed.
The government rental index includes not only larger multi-family rental
properties of interest to institutional investors, but also single-family rentals and
small multi-family properties. These smaller properties may perform differently
from the institutional segment of the market. The NREI, however, excludes the
smaller properties and looks only at class A and B properties, those most likely to
be held by apartment REITs or institutional owners.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 57
Weighted Average Excess Demand (WAED)
Weighted Average Excess Demand, the difference between employment growth
and stock growth, was statistically significant in some models. Interestingly,
WAED does a better job of predicting REIT returns than the government index
and works about half as well as the NREI.
Percentage Change in the Number of Apartments
Because of the noise created by apartment unit accounting discussed in Chapter
3.1, this-variable helped reduce the volatility in REIT returns, resulting in higher
R-Squares across the board. For example, the statistical model which represents
FFO growth per unit goes from an R-Squared of 8.82% to 37.1% when apartment
growth is included in the regression.
A Review of Non-Statistically Significant Variables
Government - Weighted Average Rent Growth (WARG)
In all but a few cases the Government - WARG variable resulted in insignificant
t-stats (i.e. 2> t-stat >-2). As previously discussed, we believe noise inherent in
the construction of the government index is diluting its effectiveness. The
inclusion of apartment growth in the analysis, however, did improve the R-
Squared in each case, further supporting our theory that apartment unit accounting
is skewing per unit growth rates.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 58
Weighted Average Employment Growth (WAEG) & Stock Growth (WASG)
While WAEG and WASG were not predictive measures of apartment REIT
returns, the signs of these variables indicate: (1) As MSA employment grows in
areas where apartment REITs are heavily concentrated, their returns are positively
impacted, and (2) Stock growth and apartment REIT returns are inversely
correlated.
The results show conclusive evidence that FFO growth and marketfundamentals are
correlated, albeit the relationship is not as strong as anticipated
Hypothesis #3 - FFO growth should determine a REIT's market capitalization growth.
Results: A regression analysis of the variables described in Chapter 3.0 resulted in
statistical models, with significant t-stats, which explain:
1. 37.8% of the variance in the percent change in Market Capitalization per unit
across the sample of selected apartment REITs using a panel data approach given
NREI WARG and apartment growth;
2. 59.6% of the variance in the percent change in Market Capitalization per unit
across the sample of selected apartment REITs using a cross-sectional data
approach given NREI WARG; and
3. 39.0% of the variance in the Capitalization Rate across the sample of selected
apartment REITs using a panel data approach given NREI WARG and apartment
growth
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 59
Discussion: While the empirical results presented above do not directly address the
issue of FFO and stock price correlation, previous academic research does. As
previously stated, Fields et al. (1998) showed that FFO explains 57.8% of the
variation in price, which is less than the 61.3% explained by the model including net
income. "However, the Vuong test statistic is 1.55 with an associated two-tailed p-
value of 0. 12, suggesting that the explanatory power of the two models is not very
different."
Previous academic research does show conclusive evidence that FFO and market
capitalization are correlated. The cumulative effect of this thesis' results tends to
validate the notion of reasonable REIT pricing.
1. weighted average rent growth explains 37% of FFO growth, and
2. FFO explains 58% of stock price.
Our empirical analysis supports these findings: weighted average rent growth
explains 3 8% of the percent change in market capitalization (stock price). The
model, when using a cross-sectional data approach, explains 60% of the variance, but
lacks sufficient observations, with only nineteen.
5.1 Additional Research
Overall, a statistical model explaining 37.1% of apartment REIT per unit FFO growth
is intriguing. The fact that the NREI does a better job than the government index at
predicting REIT returns, however, is more enlightening. Additional study on a larger
sample with better apartment unit accounting would provide important insight into
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 60
our results. Furthermore, more empirical analysis on the direct correlation between
market fundamentals and stock price appreciation / yield could support the
conclusions and highlight a more global perspective on reasonable REIT pricing.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 61
6. Conclusion
This paper examines the correlation between apartment REIT performance and
market fundamentals. Through a review of relevant literature and informational
interviews with academics, the components of REIT performance were defined as: (1)
FFO growth, (2) Rental Revenue growth, (3) Rental NOI growth, (4) Market
Capitalization growth, and (5) Cap Rate. Market fundamentals were defined as: (1)
Rent Growth, (2) Employment Growth, (3) Stock Growth, and (4) Excess Demand.
Components of market fundamentals were then empirically examined to explore and
quantify their impact on REIT performance. Independent variables were developed
as proxies for market fundamentals, such as weighted average rent growth, weighted
average employment growth, weighted average stock growth, and weighted average
excess demand. Dependent variables were calculated based on data obtained by SNL
DataSource.
The analysis revealed that weighted average rent growth (given NREI data) and
growth in apartment units explained 37. 1% of the variance in the percent change in
FFO per unit across the sample of selected apartment REITs. The results also show
that NREI data does a much better job of predicting apartment REIT performance
over the last five years than does government data, whether using a cross section or
panel data approach. The failure of the government index to work has more to do
with the way the index is constructed than the coverage. Finally, weighted average
excess demand (WAEG - WASG) works better at predicting FFO growth than
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 62
weighted average rent growth (given government rent data) and about half as well as
the weighted average rent growth (given NREI data).
The market capitalization results tend to validate reasonable REIT pricing. The
results show that weighted average rent growth and apartment growth explain 38% of
the variation in the percent change in market capitalization when using a panel data
approach, and 60% when using a cross sectional data approach. These results, when
taken in the context of previous research done by Fields et al., confirm the rational
link between market fundamentals and REIT stock price returns.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 63
7. Bibliography
Alfieri, Denise. "Geographic Focus: How Important Is It?," Bloomberg, (February 10,1997)
Bers, Martina and Tomas M. Springer. "Sources of Scale Economies for REITs," RealEstate Finance, (Winter 1998), pp. 47-56.
Capozza, Dennis R. and Sohan Lee. "Property Type, Size and REIT Value," The Journalof Real Estate Research, (1995) pp. 363-379.
Capozza, Dennis R. and Paul J. Sanguin. "Focus, Transparency and Value: The REITEvidence," Real Estate Economics (1999) Volume 27, No. 4, pp. 587-619.
Capozza, Dennis R. and Paul J. Sanguin. "Why Focus Matters," Real Estate Finance(Winter, 2001).
Capozza, Dennis R. and Paul J. Sanguin. "Leverage and Value in Apartment REITs," TheNational Multi Housing Council, (1999).
Carr, Fred. "Valuation Methodology and Rationale," The Penobscot Group, Inc.
Chan, K.C., P.H. Hendershot, and A.B. Sanders "Risk and Return on Real Estate:Evidence from Equity REITs", AREUEA Journal, (Winter 1990), pp. 43 1-452.
Chatrath, Arjun, Youguo Liang and Willard McIntosh. "Apartment REITs and ApartmentReal Estate," The Journal of Real Estate Research, (1996) Volume 11, no. 3, pp. 277-289.
Clayton, Jim and Greg MacKinnon, "The Time-Varying Nature of the Link betweenREIT, Real Estate and Financial Asset Returns", Journal of Real Estate PortfolioManagement, (2000), Volume 7, No. 1, pp.43-54 .
Crain, John L., Mike Cudd and Christopher L. Brown, "The Impact of RevenueReconciliation Act of 1993 on the Pricing Structure of Equity REITs," Journal of RealEstate Research, (2000) Vol. 19, No. 3, pages 275-285.
"Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2000," PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Lendlease, (Oct.1999).
"Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2001," PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Lendlease, (Oct.2000).
Fields, Thomas D., Srinivasan Rangan and S. Ramu Thiagarajan, "An EmpiricalEvaluation of the Usefulness of Non-GAAP Accounting Measures in the Real Estate
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 64
Investment Trust Industry", Review of Accounting Studies, (1998), Volume 3, pp 103-130.
Giliberto, S. Michael, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts and PortfolioDiversification", Salomon Brothers, Real Estate Research Inc., (1989).
Giliberto, S. Michael, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts and Real Estate Returns",The Journal of Real Estate Research (1990), Volume 5, Number 2, pp.2 59 -2 6 3 .
Goldstein, Michael S, and Edward Nelling, "REIT Return Behavior In Advancing andDeclining Stock Markets", Real Estate Finance, (Winter 1999), pp.68 -77.
Goodman, Jack. "Performance Across Local Apartment Markets," Real Estate Finance(Winter, 1999).
Han, Jan and Youguo Liang, "The Historical Performance of Real Estate InvestmentTrusts", Journal of Real Estate Research, (1995) Vol. 10, No. 3, pages 235-262.
Hardin, William G. and Marvin L. Wolverton. "Equity REIT Property Acquisitions: DoApartment REITs Pay a Premium?," Journal of Real Estate Research, (1999) Volume 17,No. 1/2, pp. 113-126.
Hartzell, David J. and A. Mengden, "Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts - Are TheyStocks or Real Estate?", Solomon Brothers, Real Estate Research Inc., (August 27, 1986).
Hartzell, David J., David G. Shulmand and Charles H. Wurtzebach. "Refining theAnalysis of Regional Diversification for Income Producing Real Estate," The Journal ofReal Estate Research, (Winter, 1987) pp. 85-95.
"Investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts," The National Association of Real EstateInvestment Trusts, (Nov. 2000).
Kirby, Mike et al. "REIT Pricing: An Update of Our Pricing Model," Green StreetAdvisors, Inc., (January, 1998).
Liang, Youguo, Arjun Chatrath and Willard McIntosh, "Apartment REITs and ApartmentReal Estate", The Journal of Real Estate Research, (1996), Volume 11, No. 3, pp.277-289.
Liang, Youguo, Willard McIntosh and Barry Ziering, "REIT Correlations with CapitalMarket Indexes: Separating Signal From Noise", Real Estate Finance, (Winter 1999),Volume 15, Number 4, Pages 61 - 67.
Lieblich, Frederich, Joseph Pagliari and James Webb, "Historical Behavior of REITReturns: A Real Estate Perspective", in Real Estate Investment Trusts, Richard Garriganand John Parsons, [1997].
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 65
Liu, C.H., D.J. Hartzell, T.W. Greig, T.V. Grissom and J. Mei, "The Predictability ofReturns on Equity REITs and Their Co-movement with Other Assets", Journal of RealEstate Finance andEconomics, (September 1992), pp.401-418.
Myer, F.C. Neil and James Webb, "Retail Stocks, Retail REITs and Retail Real Estate",Journal of Real Estate Research, (1994), Volume 9, No. 1, pages 65-84.
Nelling, Edward and Joseph Gyourko, "The Predictability of Equity REIT Returns",Journal of Real Estate Research, (1998), Volume. 16, No. 3, pages 251-268.
Rosen, Kenneth T. "The Economics of the Apartment Market in the 1990s," The Journalor Real Estate Research (1996) Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.2 1 5-2 4 1 .
Sanders, Anthony B., "The Historical Behavior of REIT Returns", in Real EstateInvestment Trusts, Richard Garrigan and John Parsons, [1997].
Santos-Wuest, Rosanna "Determinants of REIT Franchise Value - A Reprise", MIT CREthesis, (September 2000)
Sinderman, Martin. "Apartment Market: Too good to be true?," NREI (June, 1999), pp.46-61.
Starkman, Dean and Jonathan Weil, "Three Firms to Emphasize Different Metric forREITs", The Wall Street Journal, (July 13, 2001).
"The High Cost of Owning Real Estate", Green Street Advisors, Inc., (September, 29,1999).
"White Paper on Funds From Operations,", The National Association of Real EstateInvestment Trusts, (October 1999).
Williams, Joseph E. "Real Estate Portfolio Diversification and Performance of theTwenty Largest SMSAs," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, (1996) Volume2, No. 1, pp. 19-30.
Wood, Maria, "Cash-Rich for the Next Buying Spree", Real Estate Forum, (February1998), pp.67-83 .
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 66
L9ooruopjjod ,1 Ig }uauiJdV put SlIUDuMpunj }Q3jW/ uAUOOg uo!l OWaDfO9 OqL
V.00 8o 0 G .o 9 01998 VALMX.:c. 18969 01 0 1611 0000 NO.1.00:V/.00'6 005,11 0198 BOZ It 81668* 5891 .I* c 6661 No0..0o
~~tW* *#t4 %C4~~~~~~~r 01'/601 509901i %11 Z81q C 11118 181 ** £ 010 8661 NO00'~~.4*~N'.'.' ''4~~b*~ &8Lij' V.1901 19'6111 U.C 19891 19608* 9810 ~'L 100 1661 NO.1.0
*Qf /601 Li 85,600l1/%0fC 91'611 61918 801? $*IS% £061 8661 NO.LS08#~~M **tt" ~~~'kt~t't'~~ V.91%81 80106 %10T 01689 MMk" 188 8611 2r&t 198 1661 NO.1.00 'tbSt!4Et~!j %61L 05891 V....11 899 .....t*..'...1116:9 : 8001 .$~4*.t!:6...8:.::,991 N.......
:.:.::%t~t~.sss:: s.~.46**' ~rd$~* 91'0 80I1 99 1999EE' CU111 866 LVI" 111 1661 NO004E.* **k ! .LO /.5o0o ...900 cV659. ..'-.'819119 11, , 06890 W661 NO.10
*.~ !i~ V'06801 V.8.0.18859... k.... 80.8919 008 O4 60 1661 No0..0
A~~s **V& ~ V~t0 10501 V.111 00 119 ...**t0 111 WM£161 2 S-'' M116 0661 NO.0088{J*5f 111C9 1960L* £161 16001 6861 NO00
1690 89001C 8861 NOC1.0
V/.000 000o 0891 19109 5CY 91101 1861 Zo0910 0000 1t81L1V8
-*N*'~~~ ~~"~4.4* WN V.~10T 001S99 %/.11 Z6t5'SBIS i~ 919111 8011 .VO900 6661 Y411V8~~ ~~ *~~~Or~~~ .. .191~%lo 11099 V/.69 11,895 /I 919011 0860 97811 8661 ?81L'1Y8~~ ~ ~ .C..~~~.44fr~~~n. V.9/681 8001c9 9.11 19955 UWEIt4 650 1500 C'4% 1511 L661 N.ll'1V8
*1)5* 4E#~~~~4 ~ ~ 1S~~ .~. /.-65 11819 .06'1 811 6d 09111.1 6191 ...44f? 1.11 9661 YV1.1.79''4 K.:..~~~. ~~t~wt
2V4*t V.900Z 0M90ss 10 % 6ol 91 MM*~ 190 191 g9111 5661 1ilT1.1VO
3o4** 4~~~~tqlb *11~~~~~1 /1c, 9 1.911 %V1 51,910 C.44 610 001M 91011 9661 Yq1.U1I9.CZ['"'"..."./009 1899 . .. 91 1'....:61661 £661 , 1.1zi7o
~~9.411% *1)a~~~~, $1)5~~ V.0/60 06115 %"'W 91115 OMI*.C. 601 9910 tZ 9,101 0661 Vi1J.1V8/.o0- 50001 V.91 00801 '4* 511 1511 SIM1 1661 981.TVS
0t569 019 01 *105 10911 6861 9O1.1.79 SZ10 W 0090f KDS Frol~~~~~~~16 810 6861 NOIJ,ISg
8691 10111 8861I 1q1.17V81/.o' o0 .o'0 0 , 01 61 000,; 01dYV
'*1)fl ~~~~tfflo '169k'? 4000.OO' 000 V/.000 00.0 St.. 109 44W 9-981 6661 SI16V8~~t~t 44W?~~~ 4*Wt .. V.000%GO' 000 V.000 0 DW ..'*t 11151 98 BS4~. 0181 8661 0608>98f
.~~tttr* *4t~~~~~~t 4000' 000 V.00'0 000 *49 ' 8*1 08L&t? 51 L661 S613>9~~I41* 4S~~'t.. ~~~A~aM .~~. /4.0 000 V.0 00TL*011 11I11 9661 01(3)9
'4t~~k"" ~~~4t2%* ~~4*'& V000O' 001G V.000 0 4..O' 999*1 99111 1661 0103)198
~~4$~~9~~ 4*9*t V.0006' 000 V.~000 000OV l 19091 180 S. 8-691 9661 063)19"' ~~"9~~$ 'tid?!? ' V000' 00V 00 000 44*GOT 1*11 911 1ZU ' 001 1661 0113)198
*1)9* ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ 1.08 000O V/.00 00''16f 01011 515 si 4It 111 0661 S113)198~~~4+~~~~~~ ~~~~ V.~~~/000 00 V/.000 0010 MU~" *0 160 it 1911 1661 0103g)198
.. '.. ~~~~~~~~~4' V.~~~~/00-0 000 V.000o 000 ..%* IRE 160 I 11 06 11)9
0 6510 181 8,191 6861 0103)19809811 *60 8111 8861 0S13)198
V.000 800O V.000' 00-0 "X6. 900161 1*1 L9 0000 NIJ0fl44*99 $dt* 4**~~~~~~~ ' 01~819o 11*9 V/.609 60050S %t)1c" 11*81 61 "'4'-.. 910V9 6661 NI.s0fl.~~e14*'t iS~~~~~.*.44~~~9 .9- 19'661 V.019 510 .A~St. 561111L 8195 %) ' 088 8661 munv.~l
i'j'% ' "1*~'6t 191 0911 01901s 1119 *tt) 9111 1911 M** ~ 0S 1661 NI.Lnfl%lZ..''tk.... VIoD 1915 V.000 19059 t?'? 05959 0869 *kk.$..~0111 9661 NI.1.5fl
W*'*'. *tttt..... ~~~~~~ V 119 11901 V.000 ~~~C900 ME&P. *811 85 9019 9661 NI.10flA09 4IW~~~~~9'*t~~~~tt'~%60199 09969 V.000 800 Z 0191 9110 S~'M 89 661 NiLsnvl~~$? t~~~94it ~~~sW* ~~~V16119 519s V0010 00 0 KM'"" 091 011 a *W* 91 0661 NIJ.0fl .. i ... :... 0 10 4...... 09 6
Y~~tt'? %$*~~'~ ''*t~~*'~~' 1.01£o 1P90 1 V000 0 SWzvIII ..%l ~ 18 0661 NO.1.01W i:...:iiia:{'1 0:' : 9111 00ot 111 661 Nr.1.'fl
1/6011 L9,89C 1/6(0'o OO'16011 101 80 801 NI.1.Ofv / ~6'~ '.. . ...0 000 01901 0111 ,1 6001. .''$.?.'4:.'" 91100 0000 .NON WS I LZE 8,C9C ~ ~~~~~ o e61 iLn oo'o~~~~~~~EC1 6~,Zc L0 Saalv
*1U~~ k~~0t.'~~ ~"44t't~~~" V.081l 01'619 V61 89601 ST=6f 111 "tt 11 6661 J'.1.V..t~~?'* (4*93 44~~~~~~L* 4~98'1 09'809 1111T 10189 14P 0:. 689 11001 .'.'.*t 119 8661 N.L.1..
Ita. stC" 41 1 0189 11Z99 C191 U61 I : ... ':!'!i' {.~-.... 09161 1661 .'1~V* ~~#j1':ssss g~ss~~*X:~.ss VIZ'l 18,985 V.6011 98'609 ~I? 81I6919 51101 V....LLS... E08 9661 .1NV't1V
r'?/..'/'.'{i*i!r" .' !bra V.' 1 18611 019 10 *s./ ' 1 o00o1 Como 011, 06811 5661 .NW'a~~ ~ ~ ~"'*kk1'~~ 4911 19055 01111W 0 1 111 3M?'?, u .. , 909189 118 t9*S. 6'6691 9661 .uLLVtv
::.:,tM~*k":::4Etflk~ 9i9'* .V.1911 00110 01051 18105 4Kkfl~~ 981 0851i'..:!s' 8665::.:.:.'61 661 .1
.:.:::.:.:. /9 058::.9 :.,..011: 90%1 o'o616 %0'o oo19 6."...'i9101100.".:} 0661 sNI.V
s'1t*?tt~sxs $$&t*49'i. 9669'? .416 1 0,0 1 1600 66115 l"!4§* 11661 818CSI*~" 1,8051 1661 .1NV1.1.9~~k~i1)9:W:~ .ttA0W'~" *"~*Wfl*"S. .01 06109 V.011 00'605 r"*'* 1wC 9609 O 0101 0661 ..9971. 0
109t 60101S 80118 11111 16191 6861 .1.N911. LOME 10091 S~~.:¥'":.D.?:'iii I dkM"~·.-'% " : / 80'0 000 V00'0 000 9069l'
.::4fl::~~~~::.: ~~~.Na ~~ 1.811 18911 08*1Z 10111S Oo80908 981 '44*'? 019 6661 robfl8-~~r$** ~~M*!~~ '1o$4t~~~. 4101S M8M0 01911T 010 .'*'t'.. 008 619 9 11 661 flbfl879'!1 **t'?"' "'AtE?'?'.' 4001 18011 01911 IllS ~ 91161 1991 .86 16 fblSWv'kIWI' ~~~4WtX~"' "'ju~~'r~~' 4150 09900S 010 15'969 z, 19911 1601 -.23I1 110£ 9661 nbnfl79~~M~t~W'~< ~'~*IiM*."'. ~96jfl~* /.00,0 1110 V.00 00 " 010 1161 ""41*" 01 61 lfll :::'::::' 0.:0 800:.:: 01800: .:.: 000.:.::. 0' 111 08; 96 9661 fbfl -"44i r" " .....::' 0 '*? :':Ji ..;~: "."t; a;:J~:t,::i'.'; 4000 00'0 V000 000 .L.}4899i:0510111£ "'j : i::i: -~ 918 1661 f ,ll8 1,
:*fl$$$10 4449ff * 4000 000 1000. 00-0 ..... ::'.; 0 .......* 1110, S 9,6Z 0661 nbnwiv "~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O' i :,' ° /.tz'o nEC N PS~m n n*04?O'O'"k't0 0 GOV %000 00 01011 49 0990 1661 ntfnlv
v/O.'o oo'o /V0 0 0 000 WmW 09 6191 0661 flbno
0 0 19101 199, 6'550 6861 floflgl
P11-1-M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~601 81 69 86 f:f11
.1.N131 .1NH36 ±9131 .19 ~-#S9&ZI IDO.LS S.IlU~d d003~~ I 13)091~~~~~ME 03689 .A.00 .1.400 '9
E lF utAr] Pu~nz~uz1 -.....-.. 0.,~ .. .]4V 0
putruwaa ssaox 'uoj 'poos otuodw -13Cl 3l1aWI xvpuaddv
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
·i --~:,:_:~..'.~...:~'..j?.:i GOV'T GOpT NREI NREI [ EMP PERMITS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENT
MSA Yer Gien 8ivu Gave. Calejard *' ki~a6~ ivd~ Gwen Caul.ed Giv.: Cakleltd 1 L
CHICAG 1988 3558.4 10188CHICAG 1989 36395 7862 910142 463.31 579.25
7 CHICAG 1990 3707.6 6162 18 48700 5.11% 598.50 3.32% CHICAG 1991 36725 0 3233 924166 50934 4.59% 600.25 0.29% *
CHICAG 1992 3631.9 416? 927399 525.24 3.12% 634.08 5.64%CHICAG 1993 3684.6 5588 931566 537.43 232% 654.50 3.22%. CHICAG 5596 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~931566 ;:PW~:~ :~"-..t524 : . ' - ii'':ii/;ii'i~':;i'!:ii:.";iii
CHICAG 1994 3763.3 7007 937162 554.69 3.21% 680.75 4.01%,CHICAG 1995 3890.8 " 8069 944169 57770 4.15% 721.58 6.00%4$CHICAG 1996 3947.1 6N 9489 952238 '59496 299% 721.00 -0.08%./.CIC~ 1W7 I 00.7 ':ii: ~.'"~ L":!!ii ~. CHICAG 1997 4006~7 ~8850 961727 618.99 4.04% 733.25 1.70% ', ""."ii ' . (":5ii! iCHICAG 1998 4093.2 M:{..". 8406 970577 N 643.35 3.94% 80208 9.39% .CHICAG 1999 4164.3 11130 978977 .66840 3.89% 829.50 3.42%CHI C AG {i~~;... ' . : i:'...ii~j] .8.aoCHICAG 2000 4209.2 .. :'". 10942 990107 ii! .'. 69243 3.59% 0.00 0.00%,
CHRLTE 1988 591.3 4430CHRLTE 1989 611.6 6031 124364 0 391.42
8 CHRLTE 1990 627.2 3077 000 0.00%/. 390.83 .0.15% "CHRLTE 1991 614.2 .. 1534 133472 .0.00 0.00% 387.33 -0.90%,4CHRLTE 1992 6154 : : 15 135006 0.00 0.0/. 400.17 3.31%CHRLTE 1993 639.1 . 1422 136159 0.00 0.00% 423.50 5.83% CHRLTE 1994 6724 3573 137581 *~: 0.00 0.00%/ 44&00 5.79% . .CHRLTE 1995 ] 704.3 3:21 :'...:.:~''. i"MI-~ 372~~~CHRLTE 1995 704~3 4A 3721 ~ 141154 0.00 0.00% 481.25 7.42%5CHRLTE 1996 7210 5943 144875 46430 0.00 524.42 8.97%
CHRLTE 1997 [ 7462 $itA!.'L.'}'".. 5134 150818 51264 10.41% 533.17 1.67% .... CHRLTE 1998 765.1 . 4308 155952 52964 3.32% 527.92 .0.98% .
CHRLTE 1999 807.1 ' " 6531 160260 545.07 291% 541.33 254%,4 $CHRLTE i'~jili~,,~_ 7CHRLTE 2000 825.0 ". 7400 166791 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00/.
CINCIN 1988 702.6 3579CINCIN 1989 7323 2192 161870 359.33 421.17
9 CINCIN 1990 7523 2457 1640692 36700 213% 421.17 0.00% *CINCIN 1991 754.1 4. 2092 30166519 .: 38097 3.81% 427.58 1.52% .....CINCIN 1992 7526 ~*4- 2936 168611 · 393.57 3.31% 42292 .1.09..
CINCIN 1993 759.6 j: 2619 171547 399.87 1.60% 438.08 3.59% CINCIN 1994 778.5 .. 2572 174166 409.73 2.47/ 450.92 293'/. CINCIN 1995 796.3 2714 176738 423.15 3.28% 465.50 3.23% .. ..CINCIN 1996 8164 t 179452 431.09 1.88% 494.08 6.14%
CINCIN 1997 837.5 2702 181500 43848 1.71% 541.92 9.68% CINCIN 1998 854.9 : 2159 184202 t 448.07 219% 544.83 0.54% ' 'CINCIN 1999 868.9 i 3172 186361 461.21 293% 553.58 1.61%CINCI: 2000 890.3 i] 2406 189533 75.73 3.15% 0.00 0.00.
CLEVEL 1988 1017.2 2025CLEVEL 1989 1050.1 2958 240918 39222 499.33
10 CLEVEL 1990 1067.1 1450 NN 2' 40000 3.51% 481.25 -3.62 A CLEVEL 1991 10465 3 1163 245326 431.69 6.33% 494.08 267% 4 CLEVEL 1992 1037.1 .f .. ~ 2773 246489 44579 3.27% 400.08 -283%CLEVE 1993 1 1003 29262 7.38 260% 509.83 6.20'0 '24 '21993~ ~ ~~~~ n", 12 25026.5 :::'..CLEVEL 1994 1068.0 :::::*: 1120 0265 1 46521 1.71% 541.33 6.18% CLEVE. 1995 1097.1 1863 251385 478.68 290% 536.67 -0.86% " : iCLEVE. 1996 1114.2 1353 253248 4246 288% 566.42 5.54.,CLEVEL 1997 1277 1123 254601 509.07 3.37% 592.08 4.53%CLEVEL 1998 1149.3 .. ! 1168 255724 533.19 4.74% 599.08 1. CLEVEL 1999 1165.3 1077 256892 54259 1.76% 637.00 6.33/.CLEVEL 2000 11763 : 1252 257969 ::: 560.13 3.23% 0.00 000%
COI5.0 1988 655.3 5611COLUMB 1989 679.9 4223 201101 0 398.42
11 COL0B 1990 697.1 , 3653 20532, 000 0.00% 396.67 044%COLIJME 1901 7022 iiiiii{W{i:.i ,. ~iii~i~i~i~ 2252 208977 { .00 0.00% 408.92 3.09% 0.00COLUMB 1991 7OZ2 20897CULUNB i~~~~~PZ m5.2 ~~~~~ 22fZ ZCBP77 QOO ~~~~~~ 0.0~,4 40.2 ,.09./ . ZCOLUME 1992 705.2 2939 211229 000 0.00% 405.42 -0.86%
COLUMB 1993 7209 '': 3808 214168 "X 0.00 0.0/. 42292 4.32% .COLUIMB 1994 7453 3890 217976 000 0.00% 447.42 5.79./,~CC~LUO: 1995 777:7 :3906 221866 D000 0.00% 455.00 1.69%.COLUMB 1996 7922 ::: 4502 225772 5228 0.00/ 469.00 3.08%COLUMB 1997 [ 807.2 ..:!°".' 26 °:i.:: 99 230274 ! 52587 0.55%/ 484.17 273.23%/ COUM ,997 802 4411CIL0MB 1998 8321 " . 3383 233973 53875 245% 494.08 205%COLUW 1998~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~z5, 8.18 zo5.,COUna4 1999 854.1 · 4i91 . 6899 237356 I " 539,94 0.22% 517.42 4.72% .
COLUMB 2000 8652 : ... 5282 244255 : : .0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.0
DALLAS 1988 1349.0 1399DALLAS 1989 1373.4 538 424877 438.3 407.75
12 DALLAS 1990 1403.0 .. 4901 2 .. 45384 .55% 40 5.584901 241 ::i:i....:::i 453.84 3.55% 430.505.8DALLAS 1991 14180 :::.:::::: 3124 430316 473.36 4.30% 441.58 257% :::i41:::i DALLAS 1992 14196 ''N 1862 433440 48293 202% 453.25 264% LrDALLAS 1993 14525 4386 435302 49309 223% 478.92 5.60% DALLAS 1994 15029 10166 439688 51241 3.79% 498.17 4.02% DALLAS 1995 1579.7 '': 11475 449844 531.54 3.73/ 50.83 234% J .DALLAS 1996 1633.6 10612 461319 54788 3.07 534.33 4.81% .DALLAS 1997 17225 ~::::;':':.: 14045 471931 .56939 3.93% 565.83 5.9%,DALLAS 1998 1808.4 17136 485976 597.28 4.90/,. 581.58 278% "DALLAS 1999 18895 12716 503112 62239 4.20% 585.58 241%,DALLAS 2000 1947.4 : 6395 515828 2 646.69 3.90/% 0.00 0.00/.
68The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
GOV'T GOV'T N WRr NEIEMP F*4 PERMITS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENTd
M SA Year GI GivnG'de ' I - Ca.ulte tSdl Given Calculted Gwen Calculted Wit ddhed vlou
DENVER 1988 904.8 2068DENVER 1989 923.7 1075 246690 430 403.67
13 DENVER 1990 942.8 a .. 113 277 43000 0.00/. 425.25 5.35% :,l'. ... "' l . %..~3.8 ~~~~~~~23 24787B8ZDENVER 1991 9638 ~440% 238 247878 .4fl....... 44203 2.80% 433.42 1.92%DENVER 1992 985.4 1553 248116 A4'' 459,68 3.99% 487.08 1238% ~ 11 I0
DENVER 1993 1023.85.4 49298 7.24% 530.83 8.98DENVER 1994 1065.7 'W"%f 4618 251805 51985 5.45% 56.25 10.44% DENVER 1995 11144 5199 256418 5455 4.94% 593.25 1.19% * v :
DENVER 1996 1145 .5*1*'*~. 440 261608 w..4...'577.21 5.81% 603.75 1.77% A# .j .DENVER_19' 16 4 ......DENVER :':':::8i '1':3.0 . . . 21 27200:.9i 63.57i ii.4?.' 65.0,i0iiii :i276i' %!.
DENVER 1999 1291.0 6192 280330 .67468 6.32% 691.25 6.18%DENVER 290 13409..'$*t 39 28652 '.*2~S 717.60 6.36% 0.08 oar,'.6
DETROI 1988 1858.4 7955moran;r~r 10ORO iRQO 5 618 474985 437.3 495.83
FORTIA 1988 476,1 8067
FORTLA 1. 5007 7564 160824 561.76 457.33
15 FORTLA 1990 5136 iii..i*i! *:
' 5292 14113 : i!i 575.00 236% 449.17 -1.79% Ng..FORTLA 1991 507.0 1701 173680 ;"':::::: 595.10 3.50% 479.50 6.75% "'.. : 12" 4.:FORTA 1992 505.7 2024 175381 .. $ .... 61225 288% 498.75 4.01% 4J5% " 4flf . . : ' *PORTLA 1903 5304 3156 177405 637.25 4. 08% 548.92 10.06% $414 )Q 1%
PoRTLA 1994 5539 <%?"'~l }[?.i5l 5061 180561 67206 5.46% 57225 4.25% :.:':x.:'.4i :*.FORTA 1995 5779 4682 185922 691.67 Z92% 560.58 -204%
FORTLA 1996 5998 4835 190304 71373 3.19% 583.33 4.06%
PORTIA 1997 617.2 5487 195139 72843 206% 597.92 259(/.
PORTI.A 1998 6350 3730 20D626 .x:43:.. 741.18 1.75% 597.33 .0.10% f9* .~p ,$FORTLA 1999 650.9 ?":i? 4.l" 3439 204356 749.51 1,12% 609.58 205%
FORTLA 2000 669.9 2559 207795 762.75 1.77% 0.00 0.0(9/.
FORTWO 1988 548.4 220
FORTWO 1989 561.7 109 194724 414.14
16 POR TWO 1900 I 5900 o iAi:::d::$*.w~.] 328 11 42e.82 3.54% o 0.00 0.09': . .. . .. ".FORTWO 1991 595.8 4.. ... 904 195161 447.27 4.30% 0.00 0% ... ,$834 : .:::FORTWO 1992 589.7 -m 24 196065 .. '4'' 459.30 202% 0.00 0.099. :yW*:: :::*SA *PORTWO 1993 6060 :[i~iii~: . 401 196089 466.47 2.23/6 0.00 0.00%
FORTWO 1993 606.0 196089 .......... %~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:'~t:""! 'iiiii:i[.".[...FORTWO 1994 6228 1478 196490 . .48416 3179% 0.00 0.0". .FORTWO 1995 645.9 ~~~3042 197968 502z24 3.73./ o. oo 0.oo%/
PORTWO 1996 671.5 ... 2675 201010 *4$ 517.67 1.07% 0.00 OO. 0 *lhFORTWO 1997 593.9 : 3683 203685 5{ 38.00 3.93% 0.00 0.08% $4. A! ?".. . 1.%FORTWO 1998 7299 5285 207368 59426 4.9WI. 0.00 00k%
FORTWO 1999 757.8 2393 212753 588.07 4.20/ 000 0.60%FORTWO 2000 7832 3:;!;'. 2216 215146 611.04 3.91% 0.00 0
FRESNO 1988 220.6 889
FRESNO 1989 227.9 2274 94891 017 FRESNO 1990 238.4 .'.481 4 0 0.o% .2. 0 0.60% '~!ii~ l .....'..iai!~ii!:.'i."i.. :.'..::. f " :i~iii
FRESNO 1991 2503 872 98646 000 0.099k 0.00 0.00%FRESNO 1992 248.6 835 99518 0.00 % 0.00 0.00%PRESNO 1993 2 '.' i 509 100353 ,OM.000 0.00% 0.00 0.00% , .5 ...'!ii 'i.-: ..'~ii~. 'i:Ai:..:!..:.,,.~:i'FRESNO 1994 257.2 i40'v' 1053 100862 . .00 0.09%/ 0.00 0.00%FRESNO 1995 263.5 $f.> 1243 101915 0...14%. .... 000 0.00%A 000D 0.00% 2 f $.3......<..%3FRESNO 1996 270.3 .....4f3l 371 103158 , .000 000% 0.00 0.099 %o o % : . i[ AFRESNO 1997 273.1 : ::-. 13 103529 0.00 0.099k 0.00 0.00%FRESNO 1998 275.6 .' j:"'~ , 448 103842 . 00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%FRESNO 1999 284.0 .. *40 / 490 104290 oM.o. 0 8.00% 0.0 .0 : W .
FRESNO 2000 295.5 ....... : . 346 104780 o.O 0099. 0.00 0.00%
HARTFO 1988 658.4 1179
HARTFO 19809 6579 1725 98719 018 NARTPo 1990 6456 o...'.'40% 415 1k656000 0.00% 000i.0a¢. .t..:.::::1~~~~~~~~~~~~~(:¢ '"8 '.'TF '1990 415 1-01 o1o
HARTFO 1991 6201 :: .': 215 100859 . 00 0.00% 0.0 000% : ¢0:' 444.fl~.- .....HARTPO 1992 600.1 439 350 101074 $,~ 0.00 0.099k 0.00 0.00% 41i* .. 44$... ...- fl$HARTFO 1993 597iiii!:: t...%}RT 1993 5970 4...424 {.{..:. ' . 0.oo222 101424 OM..".'.0 0.00% 0.00 M{.-'/.:.::' HARTPO 1994 5874 4*' 325 101646 . 4% 0.00 0.009k O 0. 0 Qak M* 49]ARTFO 1995 5910 ..4:.. 54 101971 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.009 ' 47111 '$" ' : i-
HARTFO 1996 58%, 4 260 102025 9,00 000% 0.00 oMk TFO 1997 601,0' 544 102285. 0.00 00k 0.00 0.00%...'
HARTFO 1998 605:9 *94 102829 '000 0.099k 0.00 0k * .HARTFO 1999 616.6 '285 103777 'f 00 0.09 0.08 0.00%HARTPO 2OO 619.0 RMS.""'' 199 104072 o 000 0.00% 0.00 0. M
69
14 DETROI 1990 1905.0 4673 8 44 45600 4.28% 497.00 0.24%
DETROI 1991 18498 MIIKW'::. 3352 486476 4 '.,' .:I 463.68 1.68% 508.61 235%DETRO! 1992 18412 i
2916 489828 465.69 0.43% 501.08 1.49DETROI 1993 18749 , >. 3263 492744 . 477.05 Z44% 508.67 1.51%DETROI 1994 1930.7 . 3707 4 7 486.07 1.89% 550.67 8.26%DETROI 1995 1985.1 . .. 3477 499714 494.42 1.72% 57.25 3.92x"'i" '"""~' ''~iDETROI 1996 2033.3 " .4:ir 37 : 03191 '",0** 510.45 3.24% 589.75 3.06%DETROI 1997 2073.4 i . 2998 507068 522.15 2Z29% 592.08 0.40%
DETROI 1998 2106.5 ' 4399 510066 53818 3.07% 613.08 3.55%
DETROI 1999 21298 .8 4 % 3399 514465 . 554.22 Z98% 626.50 2.19%DETROI 2000 21703 ' : ' . 3437 517864 S 577.27 4.16% 0.00 0.00%
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
P# Ma MSA V nPERMITS STOCK :* O RENTi.S-1·"I"·. ·. ..... ·
%AGOV'TRENT
*''~n*.4 umtS LJCtlearted ~:Xtd.~C~i~flS/.l: Given Calculated Gien Clcultd 4tdwkntC HONOLU 1988 3727 1341HONOLU 1989 388.3 1876 124863 606.81
19 HQNOLU 2890 404.4 * 1453 323p "*" 663.00 9.26% 0.00 0.0% .P ' . aHONOU 1991 416.1 2915 12812 720.94 8.74 0.00iHONOL 1992 ~417 5 Z M 2795 231107 7 6.22 % 0. 00 0.00/.HONOI- 1993 416 :-5 - 1495 133902 790.20 3.1 000 0.00HONOLI 1994 411.8 2172 135397 '809.80 2489% 0.00 0.00% 1::.'HONOLU 1995 410.9 2454 137569 814.59 0.59 0.00 0.00
HONOLL 1996 406.1 45 875 140023 " 815.00 0.16% 0.00 r : * ... fHONOL 1997 4039 894 140898 808.93 -0.85% 0.00 0.OOHONOL 1998 4012 419 141792 799.5 -1. 1016.75 0.00%HONOLU 1999 396.6 479 142121 791.51 .098% 1020.83 0.40% .HONOL 2000 4023 .237 142600 : 785;41 0.77% 0.00 % 0.00/.
HOUSTO 1988 14255 741HOUSTO 1989 1480.1 2118 529373 378.04 37333
HOUSTO 1994 16873 ::: 5" 55 .' 4::19HOUSTO 17499667 44. . 2% 46550 431':':'' . ..:" .W n'-KA(t ~ n
HOUSTO ..'.. SSIOIS S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. 51292 262% 487.25 0 38% ;$3flqt::/ 1.::s.HOUSTO 1996 1791 339 556355 524.02 2 16% 497.58 649, 1IJt :9*E::i*$.:HOUSTO 1997 18603 11157 560749 : 536.72 23% 534.92 7 % ....HOUSTO 1998 19592 20713 571916 :*5*..556.15 3.6rh 56:.058 4<HOUSTO 1999 20237 10337 592629 578.77 4.07% 542.50 .
HOUSTO 206 . 7672 602966 595.43 0.00
INDIAN 1988 662.8 2383 875 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5INDIAN 1989 693. 2r750 4 167S97 0 395.5021 INDIAN 1990 718.0 2044 127 **M00 .0 9.4 3/~INDIAN 1991 1. $ 93 17291 000 0.00551 38128 138% :k
HOUSTO 2000 2064.3 " 7672 M]2W6 ~~j~ D 595.935 17239 0.00 0.001/ 310INDIAN 1992 7229 1355 173326 Ri 122%INDIAN 1993 739.4 149S 17468 : 0.00 0.00% 40250 4 07%/:
INDIAN 1994 764.7 $$~UX 1945 1716~'$. 0.00 0.00%/ 448.58 11.45% -i4E~i~4*fM$~INDIAN 1995 791.9 3352 178121 C"..p 0.00 0.00%/ 45208 0785' B% .-I - 'INDIAN 1996 8,5772HINDIAN 1996 8..72 !13033 181473 53330 0.00% 470.17 400% INDIAN 1998 84.2
54413 03
INDIAN 1999 87.8 3621 18710S 5860 266% 498.17 4.79%
INDIAN 199 8586 190726 " 52968 .5n 51.67 3515' % ' " '~INDIAN 6 2 3M2649 193815! 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% .'
JACICSO 1980 4025 2777INDIAN ~~~~~~~~:i·:is~' "~ilHACSOL 199 4108 1899 118322 0 396.67
22 JACICSO 1990 421.4 :~!~ij~ji~ : ~ 2177 -0.00% 414.17 4.41'! % o: . ~:'JACICSO 1991 419.6 ......46.1298..'~AJO 0.00 0.00%/ 408.25 0.99'! '?1/6 ~ ' ~ ~ ...49i:~JACICSO 199 420.3 545 $$~ 0.00 0.00%/ 421.75 0.84'! ...$u*.%x :x.~q $JACIUSO 1993 431.5 491 124405 .44$........ .000 0.06% 422.33 0. 14.!. .i.... -. "..."":.-.-!JACOSO 1994 1248 000 0.00% 424.08 041%JACKSD 1995 474.0 22 136280 C 0 0.00 %OD/ 443.33 4.545'$%:s::.,i -
JACKSO 1996 491.2 3831 18402 50670 0.00% 44 .33 4JACICSO 1897 501.8 6 *~j~it4 ~ 1595 132233 ~ 53041 4.68% 49292 6.15 -/JACICED 1998 523.1 6 1794 133828 . 54120 205% 495.83 0.595%JACK 1999 532 i 3552 135622 56302 4.01% 504.58 1. ...... ::::.::: ....... .......ACKSO
139174 000 000% 0.00
JERSEY 1988 2948.8 8137IERSEY 1989 3011.5 6970 133789 564.79
23 JERSEY 199 2980.4 1 4PW' 3196 14059 54I~ 59694 5.69% 0.00 0. nov.
JERSEY 1991 2845.0 1532 143955 61758 346% 0.00 000 rJERSEY 1992 2785.0 " '.. 9 2107 145487 . 637.42 3.215 0, 00% ".!':t: $ i X02JERSEY 1993 2801.6 :::-""' : 307 35 ':: 14.009 2% 0.00 oo% ODi1'/.
JERSEY 1094 2824.8 *$~ % 3221 150631 *i0- 670.37 2 ..49-- -.-:-0. ....JERSEY 1995 2894.0 3678 15296 0X 88.2 249! 0.00 0.001%JERSEY 1996 2904.3 20 156630 ......... 43' 707.68 283% 000 000% DD/.JERSEY 1997 29. ...................... .................JERSEY 1997 2967.2 $ % 3436 159133 "'*:1 731.89 3.42% 0.00 0 005' VJERSEY 1998 3034.2 4724 162569 ' 75689 3.42%/ 0.00 0o -- . ..JERSEY 1999 30924 ...-- % 5271 167293 .5'"'N$.----' 7810 3.25% 0.00 0 00! 't/
J~ERSEY 2000 3147.5 * -. 7117 172564 815,24 4.32.: 0.00 0.0, :
KANSAS 1988 755.4 3543KANSAS 1989 771.6 905 7127 419. 628 41067,-,ourroY 19 20.7 ~Qi~i;ii!"-_~ i.:~ 31035 59~2~ ~I~ 58.,4 .07/1 .0 5,~5 Po-24 KANSAS 1999 73 !!i2!!.'. 72 1333s s 4269.400 1.52% 395.50 3-695'%i: .:..'A.'.:::
KANSAS 1991 777.4 ~~~818 73525 ~ Ih$..... 443.79 4.189/ 410.67 3.835'KANSAS 1992 786.9 744748 083%/ 425.83 369% JI/ $%$7KANSAS 1993 798207
475421 1.95% 44275 3.97!%:
KANSAS 1994 828.1 1673 76049 OR 46336 1.55% 464.33 4.875%KANSAS 1995 8569.7 2917 77722 '47870 233% 479.50 3.27'! KANSAS 1996 871.2 2649 80639 4960 3.72% 506.82 572 ::;KANSAS 1997 906.5 4116 .83288 5.. 64 4.06% 523.25 3' 22%
KANSAS 1998 934.4 3685 87404 , 540.81 4.68% 53958 3 1 .=1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~8.80 32·, 0.0 OM/KANSAS 199 97.14
270%KANSAS 1999 9571 ; 5060 91089 560.95 3.72% 554.17 *W %' -
KANSAS 03642 -58546 4.37% 0.00 0. 00': :134 ,0,,7 0~42.00 150m 39.2 -1.·0 3%,ANDA 1992 [. 7=9~~iiKANSAS era 73525 ~~~~~~~135KANS" 1993 7981 907 7514~~~~2 ~ 6.oo 0.~,,o 475 1M.s~%,ANDA 14 I2. 17 760 41 .5·,7 4--.3.'".'"'.0iiKANSAS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~19 ,,19 i8i. .1~. ~ii !i o:"':: 2917 m22 478.70 3~~~~~~o. /. 47 .50 4027./.KANSAS 1996 871~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~. ..... 83 " 9.5 .72 0.9 ..... . . ....... ~JiD."96249 ···· ·; .oo . m 4.58 1. 4 5%.O·/
N ;NE . iii.:*- f'.! ' ........NREI NREIRET RENT :I.'6~ 1
, 70The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
:2:·:·:·;f·�·:·�f:·�:·:·:·:·I·I
Appendix 1Market Data - Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
\ *~~$!$~i~$~.1 56 A 56 A -- c~
GOV'T GOWT WE WE! qr5 $EMP i PERMITS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENT ,rina
LANGEL 1988 4013.2 32313LANGEL 1989 4103.5 24765 1515729 628.89 76242
2 LANCEL 1990 4163.8 16090 00 4! .4:": 657.00 4.47% 744.92 -2 30% 4LANGEL 1991 40178 ..:"/,$.!,'i 8505 1556584 675.88 z87% 737.33 -1.02% .:!. ! --t4$$9----.. '---4:.
LANGE!. 1992 38392 *(sI~~W 5038 . 156509 .• ....... 684.23 1.24%,. 728.58 -1.19% i .LANGE!. 1993 37425 2909 1570127 . .. 685.55 0.19 747.83 264%
LANGE!. 1994 3690.0 .- '.4* 2876 1573036 686.86 0.19% 77233 3.22% -z8;96 ~ -'419-- -
30~~~~~~~~~~~'. 7 67.024068LANGE!. 1995 3737.5 -.469 293 1575912 ::~:..p::::: 693.79 -0.45% 76.0 -68 .94$ LAGL 1996 3760.3 K' ~$ 02 1578842 690.82 1.03% 821.33 7.07% "I* /.469. .~LANGE!. 1997 2838.1 3476 1501874 ~$~~ 700.92 1.46% 864.50 5.26% I* .NLANGE!. 1998 3919 ''**-- 4803 1585350 ii*4*. 720.24 276% 945.00 9.31% -N--- -e* LANGE!. 1999 39705 .... :j5$9: 6977 1590153 !iPq> 746.15 3.60% 989.33 4.69%1.AINGEL. 2000 - 4058.2 -' ;f"R''. .8523 1597130 776.45 4.06% 0.00 0.00/.
LISLAN 1988 1134.8 1168LISLAN 1989 1146.4 912 166420 733.72
26 LISLAN 1990 1132.4 446 167332 * ' 775,49 5.69% 0.00 0.00% !."'" 'LISLAN 199.1103 176 1678 8020 .40% 0.00 0.0% LISLAN 1992 1053.5 38 167954 828.08 3.21/. 0.00 0.00% JC /LISLAN 4481993 1049 .2 446 167992 :v...o .. 849.74 262% 0.00 0.00% ' 9 '- -' " "LISLAI4 1994 10618 942 168440 870.88 249% 0.00 0.00%
LISLAN 1995 1... 169382 ;: 894.0. 266% 0.00 .0 4:1089.9 ~ ~ 1 196971LIS!AN, 1996 100999 ,19 169718 . , 9.35 2.83% 0.00 0.00% ALISLAN 1997 11120 1018 170977 950.80 3.42% 0.00 0.00%LISL.A1 1999 1139.5 *? 689 171995 '.*-..983.28 3.42% 0.00 0.00% #1/ M% .bI
LILN 1999 11804 4. 4 7090 172684 049 112 25 00 2.00% $41 *0LISLAN 101::.2:5. 3:.25. :6
LISLAN 20-O 12126 1513 179774 105908 4.32% 0.00 0.00.
LVEGAS 198 329.8 16967
L'VEGAS 1989 3588 11818 125904 0 457.9227 LVEGAS 1990 4023 *4A 9502 0922 .'4l .000 00%' 46250 1.02% 'N/¶.
LVEGAS 1991 421.8B 4-' 5301 147224 W$9 0.00 0.00%/ 466.08 0276% 41 1kt 'AA!.VEGAS 1992 420.3 .44b 3365 152525 '.' . .00 0.00%/ 449.17 -3.63% 4At 4I% mL'VEGAS 1993 441.3 &PZ- 3561 155890 .000 0.O0/6 476.58 6.10%LVEGAS 1994 491.5 7513 859451 . 0 . 516.25 8.32%..,.w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~53 9 .o~ 9,{0!.VEGAS 1995 529.1 .-.-.... ... 9483 166964 ' 0.00 0.00% 524.42 1.58% ! 49:
'.5;>_ ..=~.:: :-!'.
LEGAS 1996 573.0 1J.:' 11868 176447 637.52 0.00% 525.0o 0.11%.
L.VEGAS 1997 6224 10321 169315 650.20 1.99% 53200 1.33%LVEGAS 1998 640.6 ......*i~41 10977 198636 647.42 .0.43. 539.00 1.3 2%LVEGAS 1999 695.7 & "4.. 6234 209613 661.78 2.22% 549.50 1.95%LVEGAS200 76 '-"f* 5092 215047 '-D41 00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%/
MEMPHI 1900 450.1 2339
MEMP-i 1989 468.9 2820 122589 0 0
28 HEMPH 1990 461.2 ! . 1242 126699 51 : i 00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% . : ' .'[$.2MEMHI 1991 478 4 15 l 0 .00% 0.00 0.00.,MEMPH-!! 1992 4637 2367 1000 0.00% 0.00 0.00% .
.6MPHI 1993 486.7 379 127322 .00 0.00% 375.08 0.00%*
MEMPHI 1994 5029 621 127701 41242 9.95%MEMPI 1995 530.4 M961%"-,1856 100i0 0.00% 434.00 5.23%LMMlvPHI 1996 543.3 '...:194/.-!!. 3567 30178 ":'*i1:' 45435 0.00% 456.75 5.24% 4 /*MEMPHI 1997 556.6 .!i-'""4fl 1594 133745 473.68 4.25% 470.75 3.07%
MEMPHI 1998 5679 '891 135339 '49439 4.37% 466.67 .87% i5.0EMPH! 1999 583.7 : .: 2514 136230 501.46 1.43% 4z42 238%.., ,MEMPHI 300 599.4 --'-"1:. 5092 138744 o .oo ' 000 0.00% 0.: 2.00%.
MAvII 1988 843.3 8786MIAMI 1989 8726 9997 304635 481.66 49233
29 MIAMI 1990 8828 t.$ 5782 1402 "-$$- 493 00 235% 516.83 4.98% 1$t -ir"MIAMI 1991 858.9 ---49$....- 2865 328414 98% 510.23 3.40%/ 522.33 2.68% --.-..~p1-----.....gs..... ..... ssMIAM 1992 849.5 ..... .. . 2797 323279 .-4,14' 524.94 288% 571.08 9.75% "".:$~-'" ......MIAMI 1993 878.2 3233 336076 54628 4.08% 699.09 6.64%MIAMI 1994 903.3 -"5231 329309 ~: 57622 5.46% 646.92 6.23% fMIAMv 1995 923.8 $94.-. 7370 334540 ..~ 593.03 2925'. 635.25 -1.00% '<if'" ~~-im 0#MIAMI 1996 933.2 -crif4-.. 249 341910 "...$04...6194 3.19% 637.58 2.37% .... 91 . *0 .alMAMI 1997 953.7 tA 4592 344659 624.55 206% 644.58 1.0 $S9 4*-- -- 9*MIAMI 1998 969.7 344~- 5592 349251 -*41'-'635.46 1.75% 647.50 24% .*W -n-''--<stMIAMI 1999 981.6 946* 22 354843 --38% 64292 1.12%A 67200 378 $M 9*-. 4$I
MIAM 2000 - 1003.8 .t*GS-'----- 6145 356105 65397 1.77% 0.00 00%
MILWAU 1988 710.6 3538MI!WAU 1999 737.7 5040 211250 425.67 469.42~, mo~ 5.,.,~~~~~~~44.0 .54 2 0.83.
36 MILWAU 1990 755.6 49--.' 4513 216290 s'$9*.--459 .4 485.33 -03% ""*1l."
MI.WAU 1991 7534 2547 203 46270 298% 500.50 213%'..WVLWAU 1992 7527 --t435-' 2986 223350. 4$'475.15 269%. 506.33 1.17%. 41 4% S5~91,~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~.~ ~. .5.~ 4.~ .4 .......MI!.WAU 1993 765.7 39-- 4476 226336 194* 487.60 262% 512.50 242% .49$- -. *1 .
MIWAUI 2000 1994 3784 i]{~{~iiii'~' '-' '~ j.':~:i.~ 1102559 230812 .750464 3.49% 5542 6.52% #': !
LAL 1995 0011 4.74% 557.08 284% .... .MILWAU 1096 811.0 2753 236015 53511 1.24% 574.00 204% 2MII..WAU 1997 819.2 78 238768 54527 1.90% 570.50 -.61%
,LWAU 1998 8406 3297 238846 556.74 210/. 595.58 4.40%MILWAU 1999 855.1 ::4%" :, 2973 242143 ' 567.23 1.89/ 609.50 2%.)5'/.
MILWAU 20001 875.0 !---t; . 2240 245116 ! f0l00 0.00:.: 200 o.0*/.
71The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
I .':."<....<.::. ,' *:;!ii'1 GOV'T GOV'T NREI NREI :. .Year P P ERMITS STOCK 4f~Clfl RENT RENT RENT RENT ..... :
# MSA , Gien { ' f. s.t 'G:v. Cl.ed GiJfdih .Gie Caculatd Gic.. Calculaed
MNEA 1988 1320.7 6746MINNEA 1989 1355.5 5039 280899 467.19 464.92
31 INNEA 1990 1385.4 iil.'= 385 : .'.'.' 47900 253% 486.50 4.64% 31~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3385ii' 2859ii8 479.oo40 . ii0!igiai~~¢'~~~~~i/~ ...!:~.8IZNRA 1991 13824 ~ ~ 1671 289323 · 487.86 1.85% 487,67 0'24 V
MINNEA 1992 1397.4 2159 290994 49931 235% 511.58 4.80 MI*vIIINEA 1993 14344 4R1 2633 293153 i!m 507.07 1.55% 533.75 4.33% .
WkS: 978 i . 5519 160/ 540.17 L2(P/.,IvNEA 1994 1483.1 *~4 2718 2957.86 51. 19 1.% 5.17 1LINNEA 1995 15328 3809 298504 52886 265% 568.75 5.29% 2MINNEA 1996 1570.8 M 308 32313 4$ 547.69 3.56%1 59298 4.10/% *)INNEA 1997 15968 56.903024 305321 . l%.0 662 3.51% 614.25 3.74% MIs^E 1998I 1643.0 3~ t~345MIC~~~~~~~~~~~~~NI4RNE~~A 1998 1643.~~~~~~~~0 i"'3923 308345 583.15 287% 655.08 6.65%.MINNEA 1999 1684.0 . 4851 312268 605.67 3.86% 679.58 3.74% .. : *MINNEA 2000 1727.8 ii:.'..: 5335 317119 s 641,13 5.85% 0.00 0.00/%;
NASI-VI 1988 484.4 2970NASHVI 1989 496.7 1117 133806 0 396.67
32 NASVI 1990 503.6 9 ' : : 980 I ."::: 0 .00 0.00% 407.17 Z65%NASHVI 1991 4957 454 135903 0 00% 41242 1.29% NASHVI 1992 508.2 0 229 136357 0.00 0.90% 427.00 3.54,A .is." " w [."oNASHVI 1993 531.5 , 516 136586 .00 0.0o o% 4413.33 3.83% .4ASJVI 1994 557.4 1735 137102 000 O % 487.08 9.87%.....NASH-VI 1995 5903 A 2447 13837 , 000 0.005. 509.83 4.67%. .138837 ~ ~~o o.W ooT/ ,0., 9.67,NASH-VI 1996 603.8 5668 141294 501.56 0.00% 520.33 206/, :NASHVI 1997 6210 . 3096 146952 4% 52751 5.17% 515.08 -1.01% ::' '.NASHVI 1998 6459 2129 1 531.76 0.81% 53258 3.40%/r .. .NASHVI 1999 661.9 2660 152176 546.35 274% 53258 0,00% :: ' .:: :iINASHVI 2000 678.6 1923 154836 000 0.00% 0.00 0.00/.
NYORK 1988 4139.3 9295NYORK 1989 4155.1 9576 2155686 50.08
33 NYORK 1990 4138.6 4:! i 6210 216526 : ' 537.00 5.69% 0.00 0.00% "' - ' ii' .NYORK 1991 39420 : " 3634 2171472 4 55557 3.46%, 0.00 0.00... .a~~~ ···5 364 555NYORC 1992 37972 3136 2175106 57342 221% 250 o ,3136 573~~~~~.42 321% 0.oo MNYORK 1993..~:.... 3765.9..':ti.ii "AW~l~i i~i;NYORK 1993 3765.9 .. ~g~4<, 4487 2378242 UI 58841 261% 0.00 2.00% Y
NYORK 1994 3798.7 : '.. 3903 2182729 '603.05 249% 0.00 2.80 : '. : NYORK 1995 3833.6 : .4545 2186632 !: 619.12 266% 0.00 00% $.,YORK 1996 3845.1 M, 8467 2191177 6 03662 283% 0.00 O.o% A
NYORK 1997 2914.7 :-.~8653 2199664 . 65.40 3.42/. 2.00 0.0%.': ¢i*-i;mWYORK 1998 4013.7 :'I 10342 2208317 680.89 3.42% 0.00 0.0% ': ..: :5 ii-WORK 1999 4129.1 , , 11495 2228659 703.03 3.25% 0.00 o0.0%o.
NYORK 2000 42128 I.'I. 14514 2230154 733.38 4.32% 0.00 0.00%
OAKLAN 1988 823.3 4903OAKLAN 1989 854.2 4924 315098 611.95 709.33
34 OAKLAN 1990 86618 2223 322 ' "*9 .6400 4.71%. 710.50 .16%.,.OAKLAN 1991 8848 : 277 3224 ....... 663..2 35 737.92 3.86%.'. ...... ... :i
,OAKLAN 1992 871.1 46A 1329 325022 67942 237% 73267 -0.71% 1011 Z 6 9%~~~~~~~~~~23,, 739.67 .0.91%OAKLAN 1993 873.1 1011 326351 697.67 269% 739.67 296% 4 iOAKLAN 1994 874.3 , 1064 32762 710.82 1.88% 759.50 268 :' * A LAN 1995 890.4 ' ... 826 328426 721.43 1.49%. 790.42 4.07% !
OAKLAN 1996 907.8 . 1202 329262 -'. -" 740.53 265% 926.92 17.27.% , .!..:tlOAKLAN 1997 9363 2533 330464 , 785.51 6.07% 1020.83 1213% 9A9
OAKLA 1998 964.4 .* 3034 332997 <'.t 84704 7.83% 1059.33 3.77% "OAKLAN 1999 995.7 1958 336631 906.46 7.02% 1107.17 4.52% 4 * ~ f$OAKLAN 2000 1024.4 ! %."8 2054 337989 970.11 7.02% 0.00 o .00 .
OKLA'O 1988 405.2 125OKLAHO 1989 419.7 566 129146 0
35 OKL^AO 1990 4267 "--'% l 34 123212 97 ' -... 000 0.00% 0.00 0.00% .
OKLAHO 1991 4318 9 6 129740 000 2. 00 00% 1992 433~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.00,,OKLAHO 1992 433.4 224 129752 '. 0 00% 0.000 0. 2001% . * OKLAHO 1993 445.5 *& 28 129976 "'* 000 2.00 0.00 2 00% 249OKLAHO 1994 4530 ... . 435 .130004 .': 0 0.00% 200 0.00% : :.-"*
OKLAHO 195 71 . 650 130439 0.00 0.00% 20 0.0%-OKLAO-O 1996 486.3 ." 857 131089 08 200% 0.00 2005' 'l " 0.0(' 4OKLAHO 1997 495.7 1 1801 131946 0o. .00 .00 200 0.00%1
OKLAHO 1998 5,08.1 2180 133747 o-4$14' 000 0.0/. 0.00 oo00% MOKLAIO 1999 25.3 :..:. ... 983 135927 o. o. 00oo% o.oo o. WAOKIA4HO 2000o 539.1 .';. 1218 136910 .t::t::'/-.:: o. o.00 Oo% 0.00 o.00o%
ORANGE 1988 1105.7 11941ORANGE 1989 1157.4 8745 1532749 756.21 730.33
26 ORANGE 1990 11774 7605 Il41494 79900 4.47% 748.42 248%
ORANGE 1991 1150.9 . 2968 1549099 'j 14*$~ 81271 287% 765.33 226% ./'4""..."4iiORANGE 1992 1127.3 494W... 2247 1552067 82274 1.23% 746.67 -244/.ORANGE 1993 11161 .,.... 1903 1554314 . 2432 0.19% 744.92 -0.23%ORANGE 1994 1119.3 '2 4882 1556217 . :-'" 825.91 0.19/ 733.25 -1.57% ..ORANGE 1995 11432 2245 1561099 82221 -0.45 75250 263 " . . .":"ORANGE 1990 11739 IflM- 3197 1563344 *9A 830:66 1.03% 790.42 5.04%. < . .i . :
ORANGE 1997 1206~6 & 4055 1566541 $ 84281 1.46% 849.33 7.45%-ORANGE 1998 1278.7 i' 2419 1570596 f.-' 866.04 276% 914.08 7.62% 4 .:ORANGE 1999 13304 -*49 4560 1573015 S 897.20 3.605'. 951.42 4.08%ORANGE 2000 13750 ' " 5671 1577575 " 4 933.64 4.6% . 2005.
72The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
GOVT GOVT NREI NREIEMP a PERMITS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENT
8 MSA G-e tfL4.X Gwen Clcued Gwen Calculated Given Cl1ulated
ORLAND 1988 5325 8220ORLAND 1989 568.4 7604 144357 0 435.75
37 ORLAND 1990 605.5 * * 7471 11 fr~ 000 0.00%/6 451.50 3.61% .37 ORAN 1990 ~57471 laORLAND 1991 5993J r~r 4362 159432 4P*' 000 0.00% 439.83 -ZS* 4OR AN 1991 599.3 -3- ...ORLAND 1992 6100 276 163794.00 0.00 .o 451.50 265` . ' ..ORLAND 1993 635.1 4121 166170 O.0 0.00%/ 463.17 258%/.ORLAND 1994 670.2 " ... 400 170291 000 0.00% 477.17 3.0% .ORLAND 1995 703.2 :, 5032 174591 0.00 2.00% 476.58 -0.o .' '0~WW 199 7327 '""'""";l'!iORLAD 1996 7327 ~3689 179623 56087 0.00% 501.08 5.14%ORLAND 1997 778.2 7695 183312 607.86 138% 528.50 5.47%ORLAND 1998 822.6 . .4*.' 10734 191007 " " 65235 7.32%` 550.08 4.08%OR.AIND 1999 80.7 7.".:. 13225 201741 67204 3.02% 561.75 212% .ORLAND 2000 911.6 i:: ." : 9538 214966 o .( 0 o 0.00% 0.0 o 0.00`
OXNARD 1988 211.1 1479
OXNARD 1989 217.1 1731 72107 724.62
38 OXNARD 1990 2280 .. t ·18'" 1252 7 757.00 4.47% 0.00 0.00%OXNARI 19913 232.3 75090 0.00 0.00%? iii..\e9:V :.IOXNARD 1991 1147 778i IB76 2 8 7 1/ W O.WOXNARD 1992 226.4 554 76237 ' 1 788.37 1.23% 0.00 0.00%1OXNARD 1992 226~~~~~/~i. "':~..OXNARD 1993 226.7 *'--4~ 206 76791 78989 0.19% 0.00 0.00%*OXNARD 1994 230.1 $: 3t: . 809 76997 "4$'79141 019%/ 0.00 0.00 ":'..:
~iii:'i~: '.s?.:' .,:°x~ 787,87 -0.45% 0.oo 0.00O/° ::;:i:!:::':': '~::-:i:':: .':~:':':"~ '76::::::::1":~::': ·':0 : : : : : iOXNARD 1995 2368 :,2D7 77806 78787 -0.45% 2.00 0.00%OXNARD 1996 2376 246 78013 7c*$~ 795.96 1.03% 0.00 o.00 - i!OXNARD 1997 240.1 4 232 78259 007.60 1.46% .00 0.00% '...".w ':y 4:.OXNARD 1998 248,3 368 78491 829.87 276% 0.00 2.00 4/OXNARD 1999 258.9 '[[? 782 78859 >¶ 859.72 3.60/ 0 .00 % '. ': : i: OXNARD 2000 270,6 i 976 7964.1 894.64 4.06% 0.00 0.
PHILAD 1988 2194.2 4038PHILAD 1999 2227.1 2874 427579 493,16 653.33
39 PHILA 1990 22414 1959 6"51500 4.43% 670.83 28% o , . ..
PHILAD 1991 2176,0 1332 432412 535.48 3.98% 678.42 1.13%PHILAD 1992 .21250 : .':; t\ 756 433744 550.15 274% 651.58 -3,96%PHILAD 1993 21368 1386 434500 : 558.68 1.55% 684.25 5.01% ....PHILAD 1994 2151.8 913 435886 .... 6585 1.2% 721.00 37 .PHILAD 1995 21822 1311 436799 574.04 1.45% 736.17 210%&WPHIWAD 1,,~ I 2193.2 D"9; 3 . . : '~P81L.AD 1996 293 " 2098 438110 :..' .. 5.99 208%/. 737.33 0.16% PHILAD 1997 2247.0 '.°, 3374 440208 60032 245% 771.17 4.59% $PHILAD 1998 2303.5 !! ' 2475 443582 615.68 256% 814.92 5.67%`4PHILAD 1999 23493 ' 2506 446057 631.72 261% 868.00 6.51%
PHILAD 2000o 2397.6 t::'e" 2946 448563 651.51 3.13%, 0.00 o.o/ .
PHOENI 1988 958.2 6526PHOEN! 1969 985.0 1714 293121 0 376.25
40 PHOEWI 1990 10007 2041 29435 - - . 00 0.00 369.83 -1.71% PHOENI 1991 10149 1070 296876 0.00 2.00% 395.50 6.94%PHOENI 1992 10101 1541 297946 *4* 0.00 2.00% 389.67 -1.47%t
0PHOEN 1993 1036.2 :: 2257 299487 0.00 : .00%: 412.67 5.39%.. : :,PHOENI 1994 11006 6501 301744 . .000 00% 461.42 1236% PHOENI 1995 1195.3 8953 308295 o o 0.. 502.83 8.9:.,,2 12L8.7 103 . 3172,.4.8."--._.PHONI 1996 1287 13 1728 56272 0.00%:: 517.42 2 ""90% " :I z 'PHONI 1997 13572 W 11014 327381 0 5.10 4.87% 53550 349%P808W! 1995 11953 ZWA ~~~8953 300295 000o 0.00%/ 50283 8.98%°/,,*$0~-.. PHOENI 1998 1429.5 '.'. 1 11240 338395 . .588.93 -0.20% 568.17 6.10%.`PHONI 1999 1497.3 * 9265 349635 - 597,65 1.48% 568.75 0.10%/ $1¶PHO 2000 1565.0 .'.. : 1i0981 358900 .* o . 0.00 O.0.'. 0.00 2.00%. :
PITTSB 1988 9655 1705PITTSB 1989 990,7 872 247906 364.11 56292
41 PITTSB 1990 1016.9 0v2. 9 783 26228 ' 37500 2% 567.00oo 0.73% : ". .PI1TTSB 1991 10147 : 932 249561 385.89 290% 60958 7.51% .... ........PITTSB 19925 1006,8 """'':"'' L',:i-/3. 522 250493 5. $ .399.14 3.43% 621.25 1.91%PITSB 1993 10208 - 44999' 5720 251015 t: (0W 409.73 265% 595.08 -5.82% .P!?TTO 1994 10345 41M4~ 782 256743 " 4499%.~j~iib~l~~ 420.92 273% 604.50 11.86% L4755PITTSB 1995 105o08 : 641 257525 40.. 273% 635.25 .%PIVISB 1996 10530 4J$ 911 258166 440.64 1.91% 667.92 5.14%
PITTSB 1997 1071.6 .":':' -' 1632 259077 445.94 1.20%' 683.67 236% PITTSB 1998 1004.4 :" 1557 260709 46213 3.63% 686.58 0.43%-*P11B 1999 109 $49 1817 262266 472.66 1.85% 693.58 1.02%PITTSB 2000 11112 ' . " 1336 264083 . '_:::.:'.,,P4-::: .:: 000 o .00% 0.00 0.00%
PORTIA 1988 6438 3358PORTLA 1989 681.8 9220 179595 417.48 513.33
42 PORTLA 1990 713.8 " 5692 leg15 -.-... 441.00 5.63% 5 519.75 1.25% '.:::: :: .:.:.:.PORTIA 1991 723.2 $ 2331 194507 :44W 470.58 6.71% 507.50 .236%. *N-PORTIA 1992 7324 - 196 195838 493.77 4.93%/ 50283 .092% .PORTIA 1993 7543 3092 196944 · $3 511.59 261% 491.17 -232/. .PORTLA 1994 787.4 5814 200o36 535.45 4.66% 524.42 6.77% ....PORTIA 1995 824.5 7081 205850 551.92 3.08/. 543.08 3.56% *PORTLA 1996 867.2 "' 7055 212931 %"' 566.71 268% 541.33 -0.32% * -PORTIA 1997 904.3 -9 8387 219986 591.92 4.45% 554.17 237%"PORTIA 1998 931.0 6575 228373 $ 613.43 3,63% 575.17 3.79% a.PORTIA 1999 9376 4482 234948 627.21 225% 572.50 -0.81% 4*PORTLA 2000 9660 3614 239430 63696 1.55% .00 00%
73The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
EMP : PERMITS STOCK ' RENT RENT RENT RENTMSA YeaTZ -- GGG
Appendix IMarket Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
RALEIG 1988 425.7 1198RALEIG 1989 447.8 1254 114870 0 0
43 RALEIG 1990 464.9 I'm:l:: 16490.00 O0% 0.00RAEG 191 47 99 117773 0.00 0.00%/ 0.00 0.00% /61992 481.7 775 11871 . 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% RALEIG 1993 503. / 107 119546 99$!. :io 0.00% 49467 0.0 *
~L~,i~ ~~~~~~~~~...'!..~ii:¥.~ii..:~ii'. 'RLG 194 53480.00 0.00% 5300 7.55%::::::::::;i~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~.~.....~..'*..:::.: ';~iiiiii
RALE G 1995 5469 **'~*~~'.~ 3946 125496 0.00 0.00% 55z42 3.84%RALEIG 1996 572.8 3326 129442 4.~~4~:i 5024 0.00% 546.00 .1% ~ 4:! RALEIG 1997 6007 ... '1~ 4720 132768 566.72 4.90% 564.67 3.42%RALEIG 1998 6353 374...ji8 4945 17488RALEIG 1999 659.4 6857 142433 598.93 1.81% 581.00 205%RALEIG 2000 6805 . ":: 6315 149290 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00
RIVERS 1988 610.9 9922RIVERS 1989 648.8 7237 291308 535.09
44 RIVERS 1990 701.5 : 5486 ::M. 4: 5. 559.00 4.47", 533.17 2.:1"'RIVERS 1991 719.8 I~ 3252 53317 2031RIVE2S1992 7249601 575.07 287% 507.50 4.81%RIVER ,1992 7268 " ~ 1960 307283 i i:. 582.17 1.23% 4992 287%RIVERS 1993 730.5 752 3243 583.29 0.19% 49875 1 18%RIVERS 1994 728.2 '510: 309995 584.41 0.19% 510.42 234., '::::.. . ::: :,IERS ,,5s 78 1? .~!~ 94 ,0RIVERS 1995 7708 .'pt4~....... 194 310505 /ii : 5 581.79 -0.% 48358 526..RIVERS 1996 796.6 649 310699RIVERS 587~~~~~!i;t'':--77i~ ,1o~ 7.03, 49,.42 65RIES 1997 827.7 $ ~~~1324 314 59.7 146% 518.58 4.47%' ::::.. RIVERS 1348 5967 1Si"fii] ~9 17RIVE 1998 8007 ~2395 312672 . 61281 276% 550.08 607 ./..:..:. .. ':i::.RIVERS 1999 913.4 1903 3107634.85 3.60%.' 577.50 4.98%.. ..:A:RIVERS 200.968 . 2416 3190660.64 4.06% 0.0 00.'
SACRAM 1988 5021 4605SACR Al 1989 523.9 4168 221134 0
45 SACRA 1900 549.4 2889!p'.1.*.00..0.00%i523.83 2,,16 0.00 0.00/ 51.83 30%
SACRAM ,193 154.0 '. 557 21535 i..{.~ . 000ii 0 .00SACRAM .....~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 ., s53.17. %
SACRAM 1994 5629 X 575 232092 0 0.00% 524.42 3.81:: 0.00SACRAMv 1995 581.1 *$ 47 237 0.00 00% 585 8 . ~ ..SACRAM 1996 ~~~600.2 755 233134 . .... . 601.57 0.00%/ 557.08 5.41% ~ .. :SACRAv 1997 615.4 1234 233889 678.36 1276%/ 588.00 5.55% 1.. SACRAMv 1998 639.4 ~ .. 2853 235123 671 .4.61% 617.75 506%DV SACRAM 1999 676.3 ,2744 237976 " 0 . ,
SACRAM 2D.' 3318 2407000 0.00% 04.0 030A *87%..~,,::
SALTLA 1988 448.2 152SALTLA 198 465.1 116 112810 0 30846 SALTLA 1999 486.5 285 I= . ' .1 25 j 000 0.00% 322.58 055514 63.4 2850*0SALTLA 19912 0. 9 131 0 0.00'.'. 364.58 13 02%.~S3LTLA 199 514.4567 113410 000 0.001% 397.25 8.96%SALTI.A 1993 535.8 1756 113777 0.00 0O0% 418.25 5.29'. . ~SALTLA 1994 567.3 7 1636 115533 0 0.00% 448.00 7115SALTLA 1995 001.6 117169 1.1SALTLA 1990 6 325~ 0.00 0,005': 473.6 5.73 o :.. 6325 ~~3689 120175 ... 434.40 0.00% 003.42 6.28% SALTLA 1997 661.7 882710
23964 46851 7.85% 51292 2095SALTLA 1998 680.1 2391 1 4829.0 37 9SALTLA 1999 71.X:~.*!. 95 186 484.79 0. 39%' 558.25 3.575' 6 714TLA 2800 1442 1309400.00 0.00
,DIEGO 198 884.5 13656SDIEG^ 1989 924.7 7854 399467 58549 710.047 SDIEGo 1990 900.4 9~~$~ 080 60721i 611.00 4.36% 722.75 1.72% /. SDIEGO 1991 9688 .. :..
693.00 12.'8 4.40
ODEO 1992 949.5 *:.i4$: 2259 4191~626.39 0.72% 683.09 -1.435'Y.j~:SDIEGO 1993 946.0 1521 421100 52112 -0.84% 65 1SAIEGO 19949560.96795 300617.SDIE 1994 9509 1 0707 422701 ~ . 609.50 -0.26% 690.67 16.3% ii .. .:! ' '" '*:* :':'SDIEGG 1995 965.0 ..
: 1868 424408
! 6231'. 7 1 5ODIEGO 1996 995.2 ~~~~~~~~AW.. 1017 426276 .. 61.6.13 6% 757.17 765 $ATA 199 631.65 368 17563SOIEGO 1997 1034,5 2i*4-.WA 2903 427283 ~ 647.04 244% 804.42 6.24%/SDIEGO 1998 1084.5 2878 430196 6 4.94% 69.17 8.05%SDIEGO 1999 1136.4 6225 433075 72 .56% 893.67 2825/
SEATTLA 1989 1038.2 1 21347963 567.0048 SEATTL 1990 1107.9 ~ 12939 J309, 6 *I0'9$ 51800 8.00% 574.58 134%SEATTL 1991 119.7 32.2540 552.53 6.67 557.67 94%SEATT 8 84.5 136
SEATT'L 1992 1137.3 S~:42 220 .4 1) 73.25 3.75% 555.33 -0.42% :::.. .~::SIEATT 199 1141.5 ~i'~~i:~:: 4299 331012 58515 298% 557.67SEATTL 1994 1148.8 : i 3981 335311 59781 2 1 .67 2SEATTL 1995 1176.3 :-4711 339292 60855 1.0% 59267 3675'
SEAT"1L 1996 1204.0 6703 344003 625.44 278% 634.88 6.995'%*...SEA1oL 1997 1265.1 ' { 7795 350706 3 6496 3.86% 69242 928%.SEATTL 1996 1334.2 *~ o 11814 358501 684/14 5.32% 718.08SEATTL 199 1377.6 10220 370315 71369 4.32.' 7425 3. : SEATTL 2000 1396.9 380535 74016 3.1%: .0 0.'::::
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance74
II - I . A .. . . -
"'Mm.......0
7 a
GOf T"'. A rl., 1.I. OV'T
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Dermand
:....&.'.:: ¥" :: GOVT ..".'-. O'. GOV T NREI NREI : " 'EMP K PRMTS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENT .\I8j
# MSA Y Gear Jv."': Glven Cllated <'""'""~"'e~ : Given Calculd Ghien Cal'ulated
SPRANC 19 918.9 3137SFRANC 1989 930.5 3234 327507 672.98 749.58
49 SFI9ANC 1990 944.0 .156 ~74 . 704.72 4.72,. 769.42 265% ...,.....
SFRANC 1991 943.6 1296 332302 729.92 3.58. 819.58 6.52% 1.
SFRANC 1992 9196 1198 3358~747.19 2.3 7%/ 829.50 1.21% 4S' \41SFRAN4C 1993 910.4 I 193 334796 ~'*.K 67.26 2.697. 882 00 6.337, *P1i ::::. :;%SFRAN4C 1994 902.2 'v 1176 335889 .. 781.7 1.89% 898.33 1.85% /6
SPF.ANC 1995 908.9 49A~ 1271 3305~793.39 1. 4 9% 1023.17 13.90% ** :WSFRANC 1996 939.5 1848 338336 814.39 265% 1131.0B 10.55% *SF9.ANC 1997 970.6 '~$j$~ 2346 340184 863.87 6.08% 1295.00 14.49%/,SFRAI4C 1999 998.5 *~'*~*~~ 3497 342530 931.54 7.83% 1363.25 5.27% ,SFRANC 1999 1033.3 ~'"'"'"''~ 2728 346027 996.88 7.01% 144200 5.78%6SFRANC 200 10028 3553 348755 106.88 7.02% 0.90 0.00oo6
SJOSE 1988 7925 2794
S$OSE 1989 810.0 2311 209088 74201 766.5050 SJOSE 1990 813.3 3223 21199 777.00 4.72% 70,0 0.84%1W
SJOSO 1091 814.8 ~ 2118 2146232 . 84.79 3.587% 754.83 .69%. .SJOSE 1992 7899 9" "'" 1301 216740 : .:.:.:.. 8233 237% 755.42 0.08% Ai1t . . ' ..
SJOSE 1993 795.0 : 1628 218041 i 845.95 2.69% 751.33 -0.54% . 44:.' !* ~}~:..SJS 1994 795,6 : : 1:" 9
SJOSE~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ...94..7956... 1817 21966i9 ~:f'e:..i''~i;: 8610~0 1.89',, 828.33 10.25% SJOSE 1995 811.4 . 1213 221486 { $ .- . 874.77 1.49% 945.00 14.0% : ' .SJOSO 1996 8660 3542 222699 897.92 265% 1067.50 1296% '** '
SJOSE 1997 906.2 .':' : ' 4053 226241 95247 6.08% 1178.33 10.38%sJOSE 1998 954.2 31 230294 1027.00 7.83% 1258.83 6.83%
OJOSE 1999 961,9 4t..~... 3557 233910 . 1099.12 7.01% 1315.42 4.49% ~ .*..~~~~
SJOSE 2000 . 9825 38 237467 1176.31 7.02% O.00 0.00% . ':. ,
SLOUIS 1988 1143.5 3975SL.OUIS 1989 1176.9 2185 220313 404.82 43225
51 SLOuIS 1990 1193.5 291.018 41500 251% 441,58 216% . ......SLOUIS 1991 1172.2 /994 223589 41882 0.92% 442.17 0.13%SLOUIS 1992 1166.2 W 6 4 224583 415.95 0.69% 44217 0.00 . .. ' .
SLOU 1993 1176.3 92 2522 I' 422.63 1.61% 464.33 5.01% ·
SLOUWS 1994 1207.9 1267 226199 .. '.'. 437.26 3.46% 499.33 7.54% ~ $I~
SI.OUIS 1995 12395 ~ .. 145 227566 ~ 447.75 240% 520.33 4.21%
S.OWS 1996 1255.8 .2...a 2129 229051 457.61 220% 557.67 7.17%
SL.OWIS 1997 1285.3 : 1738 231180 468.74 2.43% 547.75 -1.78%
sI.OIJIs 19,i 13051 6 91954 232918 $::< 479.24 2.4% 5725. 4.47% 4 .
SLOWJIS 1999 1311.2 ~2130 234872 485.28 1.26% 582.17 1.73%/
SLOUIS 200 13304 ' 2764 237002 498.32 269/" 0.00 0.00% OD', .:: ' . .
STAMFO 1988 426.2 326STAMFO 1989 430.7 74 26802 0
52 STAMFO 1990 49.6 471 OE.DO~00 0.007. 0.00 0.007. STAMO 1991 40.4 = 201 27347 000 0.00% 0.00 o.o0.o
STAMFO 1992 389.6 4:::. ."" 43 27548 :- 4 00 0.00% 0.0 0.00%STAMPO 1993 390.2 585 27591 000 OSO1e 0.00 0.00.$6STAMFO 1994 39.8 ' 154 28176 0.00 o.o0. 0.00 0.00%/W
g'w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O 0OO 0.00%/ 0.0 0. OO%STAMFO 1995 400'3 '567 28330 :: ' 0 0.00% 0.00 0.00%"'"J 1 STAMFO 1996 4024 * .' 269 28897 0.00 0.007. 0.00 0.00% %./16 STAMFO 1997 4127 : 158 29166 000 0.00% 0.00 0.00.STAMFO 1998 427 1 29316 : 0 00% 0.00 0.007. STAMFO 1999 427.9 : 439 29498 000 0.00% 0.0O 0.00%STAMPO 2000 43z iif "' 554 29937 ,00 0.00% 0.00 0.007.
TAMPA 1988 024,8 7481TAMPA 1999 855.7 4461 261110 428.46 43225
53 TAMPA 1990 877.3 N=25 S22 * 448.00 4.56% 431,67 .0.13%TAMPA 1991 863.3 3296 27046102 291% 45.25 .1.49% .....TAMPA 1992 859.2 1291 27412 47 2.12% 427.00 0.40% :.:".."...
TAMPA 1993 8851 2132 275413 48381 2.77% 441.00 3.28%
TAMPA 1994 938.9 3740 277545 : 50099 3.53% 4TAMPA 1995 9825 .48 4214 281285 513.51 2 52%/ 481.25 0.24% . ** .TAMPA 1996 I09 . " ':.4'' 4674 285499 : 525.31 2.30% 490.58 1.94% -. .: " % : . . :&TAMPA 1997 18 6241 290173 3 505.17
TAMPA 1998 1102.2 7286 296414 558.68 2.47% 537.25 6.35% TAMPA 1999 1138.8 ~ 9671 303700 ~ 4~*9~ 572.51 246% 556.00 2.58%
TAMPA 2000 1192.5 5II .. 5919 313371 591.23 3,27% 0.00 0,007/
TUCSON 1988 248.0 1942TUCSON 1989 250.0 482 101007 0
54 TUCSON 1990 251 8 101.8 471 ,o $,o, o 0.o 0.00%o. 0.00 0.007 ::..:i".:.:./-TUCSON 1891 28.5 3 . 30 101960 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.:00 W/ ........ .
-2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. .... .TUCSON 1992 74 1000 0.00% 0.00 0.00/6TUCSON 1993 269.8 840 102864 0.00 0.007.6 0.00 0.00%/ .......TUCSON 1994 287.5 / ".:{ 1954 102904 ...... .... 000 0.00ooo 0.00 0.00/ " :.'i' 'TUCSON 1995 30o .2341 104858 .00 0.007. 0.00 0.00%TUCSON 1996 304.4 ' 63 107199 ' 487.66 0.00/. 0.00 0.00'. -.. t::!TUCSON 1997 3103. 125 , 1073 511.07 4.80% 0.00 o.0D/"TUCSON 1998 322.4 ?? :'1028 109048 $'4".3 490.38 -4.05% 0.00 0.00% oTUCSON 1999 328.2 '".'~ . 1500 110076 500.18 20O% 0.00 0.00%
TUCSON 2800 349.4 ..:.' t 682 111576 0.00 0.00",. 0.00 0.007%
75The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1Market Data -Employment, Stock, Rent, Excess Demand
.~~~~~~~ ~~%A %A - wFF-.' .. ...... .:~rqGOWT GOVT NREI NEI r1 ~ ~ 4*
EMP PERMITS STOCK RENT RENT RENT RENT ~ JI ~ 1!4 1~# MSA Year Giv Gin.. C: : ated G{,m- ~ta Give. Calculted Given Ckulated
WASraN 1988 2231.2 11668WASHIN 1989 2313.0 12821 135732 641.69 684.25
55 WASIN 1990 2348 4" 57 IM $*r' 670.00 4.41% 695.33 1.62% 4WASI11[N 1999 2304.2 ~02 157126 68.990 297% 70350 1.17%j
4
WASHIN 1992 22798 :::m ' " 2916 159928 699.63 141% 676.67 -3.81%WASHIN' 1993 236 $ ...... 3983 162844 703.61 0.57% 706.42 4.40% $91 &i#WASHIN 1994 23501 5334 166827 716.00 1.76% 713.42 0.99% %
WASI-IIN 1995 24027 i..5i ZW&i.i . 6159 172161 ... 0 204%H 730.33 3AWASHIN 1996 24070 7824 1783 ' 747.39 2 30% 760.67 4.15% ." WASHIN 1997 2465.6 7189 186144 749.60 0.30% 774.08 1.76%WASHIN 1998 2520.5 8795 193333 ' 768.28 249% 813.17 5.05%0/WASHIN 1999 2599.5 9322 202128 79220 3.1% 859.25 5.67%.WASHIN 2000 2685.5 8973 211450 9 21.35 3.61% 0.00 0.O
WBEACH 1988 335.8 6563WBEACH 1989 350.0 7501 94784 573.48 501.67
56 WBEACH 1990 3591 $ 4196 58700 236% 51217 209%WBEACH 1991 3557 2363 106481 j 60752 250% 503.42 :1.71%. W/BEACH 1992 353.7 .'.~~'.i.*c~6% 1876 108744 4 62503 z28/. 494.08 .1.85% .$$*$'4R%::.:: : #. .:: : jW/BEACH 1993 3620 ~ 1861 1106280 65055 4.08% 518.00 4.84% **k'W/BEACH 1994 3805 ~3060 112481 $449~.686.08 5.46% 541.92 4.62%'HWBEACH 1995 3928 :2872 115541 70610 292% 54109 0.22% WBEACH 1996 410.6 : 1643 118413 72862 3.19% 565.83 4.19% ..
V/BEACH 1997 428.2 .2794 120056 7.4$* 4 3.63 206% 574.00 1.44% .... ..... ' . . ...
WBEACH 1998 4528 3:2346 122850 'o 756.64 1.75% 594.42 3.56%V/BEACH 1999 465.1 *j4* 3580 1269 7 615 1.12%/ 611.92 294% ... *Wr'..zf 4V/BEACH 200 99 ;zY 3567 1287 S,*t 778.68 1.77%/ 0.00 0.DD0%
WILMIN 1988 259.2 1265WILMIN 1989 2727 960 50617 50169 0
57 WILMN 1990 276 4 589 526.00 4.43% 0.90 .'6...ILMN 1991 2697 :::::::::::::: 176 52166 546.91 3.98% 0.00 o!.
WILMN 1982 26349 *4 431 5242 ~. 561.90 Z74% 0.00 0.00% . ....WIMN 1992 [263.4 431"...:¢1 8 WILMIN 1993 267.7 85 527 ',73 % 570.62 1.55% 0,00 0.00'HVA1Av88N 1994 273.4 ::::::: z.. 208 52858 • 577.94 1.2r/8 0.00 0.00%: . :::.'At...-:' WILMIN 1995 2816 4P 87 53066 58630 1.45% 0.00 0.9O% . 4* .N :':.:WILMIN 1996 284.5 :.:, 152 53153 2o~.H 598.50 208/ 0.00 0.00%:<...: &$..WILMIN 1997 297.5 .IWA 348 53305 613.14 245% aoo 0.oo/ . : " .:.:.:....... i .WILMIN 1998 308.2 894 52653 620.83 256% 0.08 0 Ai t ..WILMIN 1999 317.7 :. ' 355 54547 645.21 260% 0.00 0.00%WILMIN41W 20o 325.0 i '. 791 54902 665.43 3.13% 0.00 0o.% .
NON57 1989 49227.9 146340 15360424 428.91 54250NONs7 1990 48836.8 . 122393 IM74 .447.00 4.22%. 551.83 12% , . :NCN57 1991 48739.0 89324 15628157 ! 462.83 354 555.33 0.63%NONS7 1992 503494 ...... 93539 15718491 .:' ":..a 474.45 251% 564.08 1.58I o
1993 523175 .. ':... 98166 15812020 48543 231% 58192 2.2% .;::.i!4i::.: :a...- .NONS7 1994 548309 4i*P8~ ..' :::::::::::137289 15910186 497.38 246% 611.33 4.70'.NON57 1995 55337.1 ~ 144818 16047475 509.66 247 647.50 5.924 tNON57 1996 567721 15494 1 52322 266% 6 0N0N57 1997 58231.7 154393 16347241 ~.$ 5 3 58.40 290%/ 71225 4.27% 4q NONS7 1998 526 4%. 164503 16501634 I*9 555894 3.4 5.3 6.68% 4 Ap i7W
N0N57 1999 602154 16666137 573.20 3.14% 793.33 4.41%WOWS7 2000 604294 *W.. 136792 16821 .6.0:. . 593.95 3.61% 0.00 0.00,.
NAT/IS 1999 1085177 406761 32515838 4891 54250NAT/US 1990 108104.3 #NY 316842 U53ZM2.44*t" 44700 422% 551.83 1.72% Yflk*M14I.~ :f:'fl~'' :::i: ::: ".NATUiS 1991 100148,3 4*4 195257 23239441 14% 46283 3254% 555.33 0.63% 34 W% -69NATUiS 1992 109108.7 *6% 184254 33434698 ~ 74 5% 564.08 1.58%Ar/4* NATLNS 1993 1117797 212514 3618952 . 4543 231% 583.82 352%:..NAT/iS 1994 1590 303176 33831466 siW'497.38 246% 611.33 4.70% * .NATUiS 1995 117951.0 335281 34134642 1t*~p% 06 47% 647.50 5.2 'tir~' Ams *M.oNAT/iS 1996 1206797 356144 34469923 523.22 266% 683.08 5.50%.NATUiS 1997 1239557 *i* ,378748 34826067 538.40 290% 71225 4.27%NAT/S 1998 126967'3 '424658 35204807 *:. 555.84 3.24% 759.83 6.68%.NAT7S 1999 128783.0 ,416868 3562465 57328 3.14% 793.33 4.41% ,NATUS 2000 131830.7 394200 36846333 8 59395 3.61% 00 .0 %
76
S BMP %. D EMP S PERMITS S STOCK
.YAR C.alculated Clculated Calculated Calculted
57MSA 1989 59289,8 260421 1715541457MSA 1990 60267.5 v .a 194449 1741583557MSA 1991 594093 . " 105933 1761028457MSA 1992 587593 S>..47. , v': 90715 1771621757MSA 1993 594622 i.4 :, 114348 17806932S7MSA 1994 60767.1 . Wi 165887 1792128057MOA 1995 62613.9 :*' " 's ,> 190463 18087167S7MSA 1996 63907.6 .::I:. 201196 1827763057MSA 1997 85724 a 224347 184782657MSA 1998 67750 6 * y 260155 1870317357MSA 1999 695676 fi% 261845 18963328
57MSA 2000 71401,3 * 1": 4 . : 257408 19225173
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 2Apartment Growth, Rental Revenue Growth, NOT Growth, FFO Growth
a8 1;IT 'li" Ym1 A.o.iab.d Estes R Ly Copo.aibo AEC 1996
199719981999200O
2 Apotmsnt Invos'en t & Mgst. Co. AIV 19961997199919992000.
3 A.1i P, id.ni Properties Trust AhL 1996199719991999
4 Arth.ton. Communities Trust ASN 19961997199919992000
5 AalonBay Comuonities I. AVB 19961997199819992000
6 ORE Prop-sti., In BRE 19961997199919992000
7 Camden ?foprr7Trust CPT 199619971999199920D0
8 Equity RidniA Propdties Trust EQR 1996199719981999
20009 E.exProeosT-t4tn. ESS 1996
199719981999
Gble R.esideil Trust GHP 1996199719981999
11 -o e Iropesties of New York, In. 1'-IME 199619971998199920D0
12 Mid-Amsesico Apattrnent Commuities, lonc MAA 19961997
19992000
13 Post opsstts, I. PPS 19961997199619992090
14 Robetst R tly Isrstrs, lt RPI 1996!997199819992000
15 Sit Proprties Ic SMT 19961997199819992099
16 Chodes F. Smith Rsidetiul Relty SRW 19961997199819992000
17 Corr.stose R.esiy Iom Tust TCR 19961997199819992000
18 Tow-andCottoyTrut,Th TCT 19961997199819992000
19 UniedDomin io eoltyTrusot,In DR 199619971999
199920O0
%A#AM~-
16.73%181..6%20.61%0.0/0,5.05%
47.99%43.79%.
259.49%19.47%.10.52%/31.05%35.69%16.06%14.80%13.915t4.48%13.21%A22.99%.7,3YA-9,97°433.68A52.05%17.02%A-2.41%A3.75"4
8.835%30.90%14.19%7.20%
14.10%&,55%3.79%A
11.32%0.01%
-6.25%5332%54.77%h14.64%2.66%
-2.59%.50.82%77.90%A15.84%21.49'%19.38%26.21%14.77%37.37%150..4.622%26.29%94.22%76`66%/41.44%15.46%
5.82%58.12/9.36%.3.32%
.1.74%63.04%12.46%9.901,
21.331.80%/
#DRV/0(-171 e0
37.68%5.03%9.86%
19.87%11.55%11.64%.13.27%0.4Y.
23.31%18.815%27.50%12.23%7.55%
400.82%39.65%21.82%,7.31%
.13.7r/.0.010.00%8.38%7.52
-4.07%21.201
5.81%10.34%13.1 %,-3.42%
%ARen RH'Sotr 1Uk
-2.3P/0
8&10/7.99%
.4.899~-9.37%3334%
-45.6494
78.101/o
.20.52%-169.4
9.54%.7.149
-13.799-17.39
17.58442.0519,91%15.399)-0.28%A
159.41%39.79%9.28%
-14.3945.48
29.859616CA%
-5.2f.5.62
79.8345.01%413.9814.84%
.20,4340.63
59.43%A
17324133.31%-5.96%28.94.5.37/:0.5514.17910.3949.04
.2.859/
4.49%-21.14O.20.67.,12.42%A19.71%1125%
-22.06%41.94%3.05".1.01%
-27.304.12%
35.09%.4.7P.412.78%
#DIV/939.07%
635/.5.25%5.28'/0
11,17%412.47%/5.18%,6`8%
2.62%.1.91%
7.34%18.29%
'50.58%24.71%3.97%
27.1 4%12.77%A
1.85%1.49%3.016.31%6`325.4
12.89%2.32%
56.93.412.20%14/29%3.202
%ARental NO!
Uni.6.19%-..084.846.24%
-3,730%-5.64%A29.11%.44.3%,16.34%
.2132%-1121,11.3%-5.14%
-13.81%-1729.3.43%19.19.45.93%2225%16.74%-0.47%
139.63A43.O2%12.94%.
-152.A3.39%
31.38%9.11%
.3,97,0
4.950,96.1 1%61.40%15.14f16.62'0.17.3%
5.901Y.57.83,31.68%15.4504
134.099,-5.76'A29.96%A-3,44%41.92%
18. 1 4%A12.4911.1 ,.2.71%3.88%
20.54%17.12,022.08%14.630,-22.01%43.59%3.2O%,1.59%
-2639%4.68,0
35.49,0.3.7',12.09..
#DIV/053.15"/.3162,8.3%.3.79,5.50%A
13.71%13.959,030,0
.8,07%A
022%9.32%,
2060,.50.00/26.02%5.A6,46,
25.73,%41.40,0.71%5.27%,
.4.64%7.36%
14.63-0.29A53.49%13.49i17.66%4.80,
%AFF0
o-e Ui
1.25%.11.,295
-21.0.,.19.49%-5,96%60.41%
.33250,
38.12,23,'3%
-10.87%.2.907,0
4.0,1%
.631%-20.45,16.45%27.34,30.351.17/30.90,720,0
10331%35.31%23.92,
.44.70G%2.13
25.989%6.5~/
.2.19,16.65%6Z.4A63.64%10.41%9.41%
-13.5P9.15"A77.750
29.37,A17.40%A
169.1P.414.59,
_5.75,1.03%
18&46O/7.16.4
-3.61%
-},87%-6.4%30.81%1.51%
29.57.16`85,-2021%30.35,0-9.69%..2.0O9%
-19.86%4.71°.4
41.75A-1.5..27%
#DIV/0141.32,.35.36%
0.8505.4%
9.00%1425,03.92%/7.18%A326%-9.59%.9990
5.31%24.06%
.80.0,%.28.39%
3.73%,26.099k39.42%4.34%4.010%
-529,01096%
11.48%,.5.530,/56.44%7.670,0
12.13%4.69%
%ANe Is.a-Uh
223%-9235%
-29.89%35.32
.90.30
.34.40,5327%-37.36%
5.11%1084%
-15.1 ,17.69%
5.0,051.74%29.060k
4.41%-50.72%12.74.24.43,27.20%2.11%30.49.0
171.1 1%42.91%17.81
11o.92%-3535,-30.30%12,62%
-50.56%.34.90%3256A33.99,07.47%
2830-2.12A12.270,27.54A48.6(%43.199,70.29.85.55,-22.47%3621%.14.7.30.81%32.56%-19.40%20.79%k34384ol17,45,
-20.66%65.55%.0.57,36.61%37.36-50.20%117.930.021.44%.9.70,-.44%122547.50-3.16%-5.52%
#DIV/91649.71%-119.71%
-3.71%260.03o%19.6343.43%86.23,
-28.36,39,01%1820%103.84O.421.3(7.
106.42.,12.17%
.115.92%-430.168,0
-0.91%20.60,0
124.51%29.18,
.27.39%40.71%
132.01%49.03,.5.7,74.50°,0-6.55%14.4 400
.15.27,t
~ Ne Mas% %AIwOnlt CaP Miis CaPaerUaj a-Oaio - ais
1263 5 0.043 S*945 1.18 0.045 3.21%5 0.83 0.039 -11.41%5 1.12 $ 0.038 .3,43.
022 o 0.035 .795 0.35 0.0281 28.41%5 0.53 0.049 75.46%5 0.33 5 0.025 -49.10,05 0.35 5 0.029 1129%1; 09 1 0.036 32205 0,09 5 0.037 .29C05 1.04 0 9.034 .8.14,
1,10 0.034 -1.31%5 1.66 5 0.028 .16.42%
2.16 e.29 -.04,02.20 0 0.049 .12.85
5 1.08 5 0,054 10.76%
5 2.39 5 0065 2034,5 2.98 0.074 13.93,0/I .....79 0 .. 087_ 17.90,05 0.82 $ 0.943 38.14%$ 1.07 0.047 9.44%5 2.89 5 0.097 0.14O.
4.13 5 0.105 7,4',0} 4.87 ! 0.29 23.505 5.90 5 0.074 39.505 3.02 0.090 22.095 2.66 5 6.084 -699,5 3.00 5 0.078 -6.94,
1.46 ! D.080 16.05%5 0.18 5 0.015 9.5P5 0.76 5 0.031 100.53%5 1.02 $ 0.041 35.34,
1.09 0 0.046 10.69,5 1.41 0 6.053 14.91%5 0.0 5 0.032 0.79,$ 0.90 5 .04 42.14%
1.15 5 0.051 10.63A5 1.70 5 0.055 9.454
2.4 ! 0267 21.07,$ 1.32 5 o,04 269.86%
2.44 5 0.080 -.449%$ 1.89 5 0.076 -5,50,05 2.58 0. 076 .002%5 220 j 0.95 2624
129 0061 17.581.71 5 o64 5.09,
5 1.3 5 o.04 .. 15,1.67 5 0.053 .16.78',
5 2.25 5 0.059 112A
0.59 5 0.044 25.59%5 0.47 0.049 12.02,
5 0.78 0.049 - 1.2.,5 0.78 $ 0.050 1230,05 1.06 5 0.053 7.26,0
0.74 5 0.039 10.65,0.37 5 0.044 12.89%
5 0.0 0.043 -2.735"5 0.97 5 o .040 .5.95,
! 0.86 ! 0.042 3.59%1.815 0 0.67 -19.56%
5 2.08 0.0o0 34.0,A0
5 3.07 0 .0.005 2.97 0.082 - .72%{ 2.81 5 0.086 4.82%$ (o.y 5 . # DrV/05 0.5 0.079 #DIV/0
0o0 5 0.058 .26.61%S 029 5 0.059 2.81k{ 1.05 o o .056 -6.24%
1.19 5 0,063 6.18.,1.71 $ 0,066 5.6,03 3.181 0.072 6.95,0
S 2.28 5 0.067 -7.98%I 3.17 5 0,084 26.72.
0.66 S 0.072 -.,59,5 1.35 5 0.000 21.999,5 1.64 0 6.077 -11.59%
5 3.38 5 0.008 13.96%5 3.79 5 0.105 19.07,S ~,36) S nDIV/0
1.20 0.036 #DIV/0$ 1.19 5 0,031 .13.030,05 1.43 5 043 37,030,
3.22 0.049 14.59,05 0.41 5 0.041 5.97,0
0.30 5 0.046 11.98%5 0.42 5 0.046 0.56%S 0.98 5 0.049 5.92,0 1,46 6 0.054 10.88%
5 0,63 5 0.0 M.9A1.10 5 0.042 4.07,01.03 5 o .053 25.85,0
5 1.17 0.046 .13.C4! 0.99 ! 0.047 1.968%
C.. Ito7.93%7.49%096%975,0
10205.70%
4.75%~6`546.74%6.51%7.34%0.34,0
-7260k6.71°.5.055.79*,7.42%7.6945.3?.4.89562,7.485634%5.53.,4,670k6.5?*.7.70A6.79,8,99%
8.14%8.47%kS.,59,0
6.51%4.050,0
7,93,
5.71%5.6.P.7.740/07.48,6.04°.46`4506.91/67.69%8&99,0829%6.94%521%
7.71%8.78,
9.01%
9.1P.,10.07%
9.088%8,37,04.99%6750,7.11%7.61%
#DIV/08.848.241.48.670,08.907k6.52%7.02,07.34%.69,07.43,7.79,06.74,7.64%7.3.7. 42%
#DIV/CO7.399.08.94%8.21%
-10.130k9.65,9.078,60,8.72,9.01%567?/,8.36%7.54/6
10.19%10.48%
77The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 3Market Cap Growth
REIT 'rk. ¥VI Aodtced Ettes Relty Copocion AEC 1996
1997199819992000
2 Ap.rmen Inuo nto & Mgmt. Co. AIV 19961997199819992000
3 Amli Rtoidontie Proprcnti Trut M . 199619971998199920O0
4 Archtone Communitie Tnrut ASN 19961997199819992000
5 Aolny Commuiic inc AiVB 19961997199819992000
6 BRE Propoei, Inc BRE 19961997t99819992000
7 iGmdenPro PeryTet CPT 19961997199819992000
8 Equity Rrideontil Propeirdc Trust EQR 19961997199819992000
9 Essc Per T rust Inc ESS 19961997199819992000
11 Gble Rsidentil Trult GBP 19961997199819992000
11i Home Popeties uo Ne Yord, In c 19961997199819992000
12 Mid.Americ Aprtment Communiiet, nc MAA 19961997199819992000
13 Post Popertin I.c PPS 19961997199819992000
14 Robrt Reliy In tor Inc RPI 19961997199819992000
15 Summit Properties nc SMT 19961997199819992000
16 Chrnu E. Sith Reddeni, l Ri lty SRW 19961997
19992000
17 Coen toneelul. InoeomoTr st TCR 19961997199819992000
18 Tote d CUOt tyTrs., The TCT 19961997199819992000
19 UOited Dominion R.ly Trut Inc.. UDR 19961997199519992000
M-s rMbcMv c2
S 63.0 2A$ 7799 2224'$ 833.3 6.85'$ 804.9 -3.41%$ 784.5 -2.5 5 1,041t3 9.02'
2,627.1 152J294,807.4 82.99'
$ ,391.7 32.965 9,340.3 46.13
641.1 27.25%1 799.1 24.65'6
915.3 14.54'hS 878.2 .4.051 990.0 12.73'I Z8912 29.39'1 3,6253 25.396$ 5,365.5 480o%{ 5,666.6 5.61%1 6,018.3 6.211 1,026.7 84.66'h1 1,708.5 66.41'h
4,1612 143.56%$ 4,362.3 4.83'h
5,5E9.6 28.13'h1,125E 152.36'
; 1,800.3 59.91,h; 1,920.6 6.6V00$ 1,916.0 .0.24AS 2405.8 . 25.565 744.8 18.94%| 1,550.1 10,.12'h5 2,335.5 50.67$ Z585.6 10.71%1 2785.3 7.72'h1 4,081. 54.54'hI 8,979.4 120.0P/
11,388.9 26.83h/S t1796.6 1236'
t 5,093.5 17.95A565.7 81.90'h
$ 961.2 69.91$ 1,052.0 9.45%$ 1,277.7 21.4565 1.924.9 50.65A,
t1,O52. 48.41%$ 1,269.9 20.62%
1,741.9 37.17%5 1,666.9 .431%
1,769.7 6.17%t 30.0 5.A00%$ 670.1 117.56D$ 1,169.6 74.54%$ 1,676.2 43.31%
2,075.9 23,85'4,1 749.7 17.31%
1,3383 78.51%{ 1,423.5 6.37%$ 1,383.3 .2.82'S 1,408.0 1.79'$ 1,5755 31.15.
2,374.2 50.710'8 2608.8 9.88%
2,889.4 10.76%/1 3,083.1 6.70'1,
S #DIV/0l1 134.1 #DIV/05 135.5 1.04%'A$ 146.4 8.041'
150.0 3.011t 894.0 27.28'65 1,054.3 17.83%$ 1,282.3 21.63%$ 1,336.6 423%h
I 1,701.4 27.29h$ 1,190.0 18.899%$ 1,7252 44.970A5 1,944.7 12772%
2Z487.2 27.90'I 185.0 28.06%I - #DIV/091 500.0 #DIV/0S 614.5 5.95%$ 903,6 47.05%5 092.7 .121%S 555.8 5.97'5 622.4 11.99,6
678.2 8.97P772.4 13.19,821.6 637%,
$ 2,422.6 63.59/2667.8 10.121,',704.6 38.86%3,643.9 -1.64A
5 3,588.4 _- 1.52',j
Mkse % ACp hI Cp
,m.r uI. - .1t
$ 0.043 5.899[ 0.045 3.289S 0.039 -11.41'A5 0.038 -3.43,
o0.035 -7.925 0.028 28.415$ 0.049 75.46'$ 0.025 .49.10$ O028 11.2995 0.036 32.2291 0.037 -2.909
0.034 .8.14"A5 0.034 -.1,31$ 0028 .16.420A1 0.028 .1.04'A$ 0.049 -12.851 0.054 10.765.
0.065 20.34°[ 0.074 13.9,7I .087 17.975$ 0.043 38.149,1 0.047 9.445S 0.097 10.14A$ 0.105 7.4YJ
0.129 23.53',0.074 39.50A
$ 0.090 22.09'5 0.84 .6S95 0.078 .6.94
0.086 10O.05'S 0.015 9.58'
0.031 100.53'A$ 0.041 35.34S 0.046 10.69A
I 0.055 14.91$ 0032 0,79'A$ 0.046 42.149
0.051 10. 63'5 0.055 9.45'
0.067 21.07/5 0084 269.8
0.080 -4.49'.OD76 .5.52A
1 0.076 -0.029A0.095 26.20'0.061 17.5/
{ 0.064 5.09$ 0.64 -0.15$ 0.053 -16.78%
0.059 11.32'0.044 25.59A0.049 12.02'
$ 0.049 .120'30.050 1.33"
$ 0.053 7.260.039 10.85'h
$ 0.044 12z8940,043 -2.7y
5 0.040 .5.9501 0.042 3.59A
0.067 -19.56A0.090 34.0010.090 -0.021o
5 0.082 -8.721o 0.086 4.82'S - #DIV/05 0.079 #DIV/9$ 0058 -26.61A
0.059 2.870.o05 -624'h0.063 6.18
$ 0.066 5.63'/a5 0.072 8.95,5 0.067 .7.98'h1 0.084 26.72'5 0.072 .3.58'h
0.088 21.9895 0.077 -11.5P,65 0.08 13.96'A! 0.105 19.07%6
- # DIV/090.036 #DIV/01
5 0.031 -13.0 '1 0.043 37.O3'
0.049 14.58"/1 0.041 5.97AS 0.046 11.98'I 0.046 0.56
0.049 5.92', 0.054 10.8B%$ 0.040 34.9,'A
0042 4.07%0.053 25.85%
$ 046 -13.04'A! 0.047 1.96,h
Cv R
7.49A8.86%9.750,
1020A5704.204.5554.75'A6.54'A6.7496.51%,7.348.34'97.2696.7195.855.797.42'7.69'5,374B.0,5.62'7.48'i6.8495.52A4.67'6377.70'6.79A6.98'A6.83'8.1498.47PA8.59%6.51'4.8596.92'A8.32'A7.93'A5.71U5.63'7.74A7.48'
6.45%36.9194
8.99PA8.3906.94A521ff6.6747.71%A8.7A9.010A6.22'9.18ff
10.07'A9.88'A6.371A4.99A6.75'h7.11%7.61
#DIV/OI.849f824ff8.67PA8.90'6.52'A7.02734'A8.69',7.43f7.79%6.74%7.64%733'7.42,A
#DIV/O7.38'h.94
10.13A9.65A9.07,6
8.72'/9.01%5.67,8.36%7.54%/
10.19%10.48h,
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 78
Appendix 4Weighted Averages
REIT Ti.ker YeerI Aesoeited Estate Realty Crpoqotion AEC 1996
1997199819992000
2 Apatment Investment & MgmL Co. AIV 19961997199819992000
3 Ai Residetial Propetia Trust AML 1996199719981999200
4 Archstone Communitie Trust ASN 1996199719981999
2000AlonBay Communitie Inc AVB 1996
1997199B19992000
6 BRE Ptoperti Inc. BRE 19961997199819992000
7 Cmden ropes Trust CPT 19961997199819992000
8 Equi Reidenta Propesfies Trust EQR 19961997199819992000
9 Es- Ppert Trust., Inc ESS 1996199719981999
200010 Gbles Reidential Tust GBP 1996
199719981999
200011 Home Propeti orNew Yor , Inc RE 1996
199719991999200o
12 Mid-Ami Aparme nt Communitie . Inc. MAA 1996199719991999
200013 Post .Propeti, Inc PS 1996
1997199819992000
14 Rober Real ty Inveto, Inc RPI 1996199719981999200O
1I Summit PNopertcs Inc SMT 19961997
199819992000
16 Chales E. Smith Resldental Re ty SRW 19961997199819992000
17 Cotnest.nc Real I.m Trust TCR 19961997199819992000
18 T-~n sd CounU7 Trust, The TCT 19961997199819992000
19 United Dominion Raq Trust. Inc UDR 19961997I99319992DO
GOVT NREIWARG WARG2944' 4.94%2.51% 3.92%3.50% 3.06181% 4.44%3.42/ 3.42%2.81% 4.14%3.57% 3.79%2.96% 4.70%2.82'h 324%3.58% 3.5'8%3.47 2.48%3.74 3.28%425%h 4.33%2.97% 2.74%
3.68% 3.68%2.97% 35%
3.88% 4.12%329% 3,7(P/3.42% 2.93%4.10% 4.10%2.59% 7.74%320%h 5.77%422Y 5.944.31% 4.54%4.79% 4.79%2.64%' 5.50%4.800/ 5.58F1.98% 4.04%3.4% 297/04.48% 4.48%2.32. 3.65/3.45% 3.87%2.r97% 3.73%
328% 1.97r/
3.63% 363%3.02% 4.01%M3.65 3.98%3.18% 4.34%2.12A 3.22%
2.I5 3.85%2.49%' 923'h3.76% 7.64%5S9h 5.78%04.57/ 3.1'h
4.64' 4.64%3.61% 3.78A3.58P 423%3.72Oh 3.06%3.16% 1.14%2.98% 2.98%2.70% 529%'2.67" 329%
3.0% 5.56A3.05% 4.068%3.64% 3.4%3.32/ 4.94%3.52% , 4.10A3.51% 4.16'h3.9 3.39%3.56A 3.56A4.6% 2,63%3.79/ 3.12%4.00% 2.87%/3.41% 225%3.49 3.49'5.36% 1.69%3.48% 1.79%3.71% 1.4P%324% 1.91%329'h 329'h3.63' 4.09P3.93' 2.94%3.33A 2.98%A2.71% 3.09%3.32 3.32'h2.30'% 4.15%0.54'% 1.6%/2.79/ 5.84%3.06A 5.14'h3.42/ 3.42%3.41% 5.00%4.50O' 3.74'h3.851% 3.77°03.37% 3.41%3.69P 3.69'h2.18% 5.22%0.99/ 2.43'287N 3.81%
3.09% 3.91/3.50% 3.50%2.96'h 4.5SO3.75P 41/324%' 4.32%3.04'h Z889%3.62'h 3.62'
WAEG WASG WAED1.899h 0.97/ 0.92%1.3% 0.99% 0.84%/2.29% 1.10% 1.20%h2.01% 126% 0.75%/1.58'h 1.53% 0.05%3.59% 1.87% 1.72/D3.51% 1.90o/ 1.61%3.07% 1.72% 1.35'b2.64A 1.99% 0.65/2.18% 1.81% 0.37h3.522 Z43% 1.09%3.49% 2.16% 1.33%/1.92 2.38% 1.5I4%3.579 2.73h 0.84h3.37% 2.64% 0.72%/3.78 2,05% 1.73%3.79A 2.07" 1.72%A
3.87/ 2.27% 1.60%3.49%/ 2.36% 1.13%3.16% 224% 0.93%2.13%/ 1.35% 0.78%2.85 1.46/ 1.40/h3.04% 1.46/ 1.58%2.33' 1.65'h 0.68%2.04% 1.61% 0.44%3.88%/ 1.55Y 2.33%3.91% 1.65% 2.26/4.13% 1.80% 2.33%3.80TA 1.85/ 1.95'h3.53% 1.57% 1.96%/4.42%/ 2.85/. 1.57%
5.05/ 2.91% 2.15%/4.31% 2.93' 1.38%4.38A 3.35Y 1.02°A3.68% 2.58h% .L0MA
3.60% 2.07/ 1.53h3.49% 1.98% 1.52A3.48% 2.03%b 1.45/3.06% 2.2% 0.86%2.81% 2.14% 0.67%3.25% 0.95Y 2.30%3.83% 1.26/ 2.58%3.98% 1.36. Z602.53% 1.42'h 1.11%2.19'h 1.19%/ 1.00A3.37% 2.11% 1.26%3.71% 2.0A 1.62%/"4.56% 2.36% 2.20%3.62% 2.93. 0.69/3.65Y 2.59A 1.06%2.53%/ 0.98/6 1.55%
2.39% 0.84 1.55%1.85% 0.90/ 0.95%/1.79% 1.16% 0.63%A1.49%/. 122%/ 0.27/
2.77% 1.39%/" 1.39P2.86% 1.79t 1.06%2.84% 1.46 1.39/2.46% 1.471/ 0.99%1.87% 1.72% 0.15%
3.90/ 2.80 9 1.19%
3.96% 2.40A 1.56%436A 2.67A 1.68%4.21% 3.00% 1.21%4.32% 2.96'/. 1.36%4.3P 2.91% 1.39'h3.42% 2.51% 0.90/3.91% 2.69%/ 1.21%4.59% 2.69% 1.904.79% 2.92% 1.86%/2.71% 2.18% 0.53%326% 2.37%/ 0.89h3.36% 2.50% 0.86%3.59% 2.88% 0.71%3.35% 329% 0.06'h0.18% 3.589% -3.40/2.39% 4.16%/ -1.77%222eh 3.25Y -1.02%A2.70/ 3.56/ -0.97%
2.75% 328% -0.53%2.97% 1.78% 1.189%
3.53% 2.01% 1.53%3.47 2.19A 129%3.43h 2.35A 1.08/h2.45/ 2.36% 0.09%0.49A 126% -0.77%2.66% 1.44% 1.22%229/ 1.61% 0.67/2.39% 2.00% 039'h2.49% 2.18% 0.31%2.95Y 1.75% 120%3.42A 1.81% 1.61%3.48% 2.01% 1.47/3.01% 222% 0.79%/2.51% 2.21% 0.301
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 79
Appendix 51996 - 2000 Average - Weighted Averages
# REIT Ticker1 Associated Estates Realty Corporation AEC2 Apartment Investment & Mgmt. Co. AIV3 Amli Residential Properties Trust AML4 Archstone Communities Trust ASN5 AvalonBay Communities Inc. AVB6 BRE Properties, Inc. BRE7 Camden Property Trust CPT8 Equity Residential Properties Trust EQR9 Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS
10 Gables Residential Trust GBP11 Home Properties of New York, Inc. HME12 Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. MAA13 Post Properties, Inc. PPS14 Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. RPI15 Summit Properties Inc. SMT16 Charles E. Smith Residential Realty SRW17 Cornerstone Realty Income Trust TCR18 Town and Country Trust, The TCT19 United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. UDR
AveraPe 1996 - 2000
GOVT NREIWARG WARG
2.82% 3.96%3.15% 3.89°/03.62% 3.30%3.53% 3.74%3.82% 5.76%3.55% 4.51%3.13% 3.37%3.37% 3.88%4.11% 6.22%3.41% 3.04%3.03% 4.37%3.40% 4.03%3.87% 2.87%3.81% 2.03%3.38% 3.28%2.42% 4.08%3.76% 3.92%2.54% 3.77%3.32% 3.87%
WAEG WASG WAED1.92% 1.17% 0.75%3.00% 1.86% 1.14%3.57% 2.47% 1.10%3.62% 2.20/0 1.42%2.48% 1.51% 0.97%3.85% 1.68% 2.17%4.37% 2.92% 1.44%3.29% 2.08% 1.20%3.16% 1.24% 1.92%3.78% 2.41% 1.37%
'2.01% 1.02% 0.99%2.56% 1.57% 1.00%4.15% 2.77% 1.38%4.20% 2.75% 1.45%3.26% 2.65% 0.61%2.05% 3.57% -1.52%3.17% 2.14%/o 1.03%2.06% 1.700/o 0.360/a3.07% 2.00% 1.07%
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
I -_____ __ __ ____ _____
80
Appcndlx 6Geographic Concentrtion -2000
2 Abd.. TX~ ~ ~ ~~ ~> DTa
Ak,- OH 231Z. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .0 "'*4* 1a.7. 'D'j " ¶4 :00:"'.'..'- ii 0:00
O PA 4 Dt. 14 _ ':2.2 . ...A D 0 x 00 D'2 . 07 2'''' 0% 2'»2 M~ecU' 000% 2:2~$j0.05 ~....... 000 ......... 000 2::2:: 000% .C''2.: c n $j:2~$ 0004 . 000% ..% ::2: 00% '222:22:22D .00o hO .:~lr 'on+» ~:XXo~ 00)4x *~:::~:: 000%o. 0.0".0%" on :22$S22:oo "2* 0
AU Pt·DlllaA D. w % M ..0 0 mY I* Alboqeocyoc 0006 C 000% ~~l :-~*::::: 043%~ 2:X',. ,"?' 000% "::!i*i,~ : o290% 2.$ ; :2~,~. :.':2::. o.,on 2:,..2..* 444% .'.'::::Z.2 ~ ~ :.: i:::2:.'': 030 "'2$ 0.00%: ::: o.o/~'"q'~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4~'*7 AJ~eo~cn-OO, ekdt ero do P~A 0 on :2i:!:4:.0.00 .'. o.'. con ".':.".'.'~ .6'.!iii':~ 0.00 :2:;!:!:2:2:2:2: oono g:>~i~~!..:! o : ..'3 0.00% :~:~:.:<:::: o.on~ i:~~i .. ,.:::!::.'.:. con .o.2 '00 :'2:'.!:<:i. con
D D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2o.on :2:2: O)(:2:j 007%~ i~ . . WT oon 0.00% 2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2: .07% '2:X'2: 0 ' ..o ' ..' .. .0 A,,ooP. . . ....... .. ......... AM.
O ~~~~~~~~~J4 f ~~~ ~0Wl 00074 'X00'2 007%.I
00 A.cA C.cOCW ...)q.~. ..A~~'i .2 oon D .% D.. - -n2::::22: D.n>>22'.2: 0 02:' con D'.oo .' 1% '...C D .% S2 $.on12 Acout0AL 000. ASD % " ": 000 .!, Oon . .00% 2: -:::::.. :::.:::c::::.: :0::::0::::':: o.0% WA . : .O
.. i.-S. U... TX D..%:2::2:2:2:2 1 .. . .. 3 D .'....2 2*
..^B. ,~=~ Ei:!~~,.. !i':4'~ ., ~:~~: .. !.. L .M. ' .. ' ,3 .;i ~ i D " i- : !,i::~ o ~ .. ~s: .o. W.Aj ~.~ !.W!'A~oo ::L.i .o1 P AD D. o. 0 . 0. c " .'. D. 024 ....e.... ."'..:: 0 ::.-: ' tD'. , 0% on :2:::::,:,u..:.:c:t. : i: .o? :: U.M.:.T. :...: D.. DO:::2:..,.:.:.: :: ... ::2:':::: ::>::: : .o .... . : : o o'
00 kolecOc Oty-Cepe t~op0~ 000% .. 0.';.-: oii ...:4% o. 0.0' D::2:2:2 0.0o. :-" :2:2: o.io i::2:2:2:2: 0.00 .0%DDO:A D.:.: ::: 0.00.17 Acgoet- AL AS.c . . .. . 3k c n . 0% 2222:::::000 :::::222 0%D2222222 cor.A22W 12: .,% 2:::2222: 0% 2:...''' -on4.n A. W.*yl~i ~ ~ I · " ·II Ae... oY Mcoce UOn% ..W.'. 037 2:4W--. 13,00%2:2 : : : :2::MM2:: 2.47% :2 o.on D.2:2tt2 3.00%
31 D.% D. WA 2.12% 5.41-A D..% ..OIA~p~p0ZII ~~Ml~~lblt.Y~~~·a~~i040 *~ot e44""" cccv "i~ 6t'21*" 0.27) *:~:: 24314 2:::::222..on.r::2::::::2: 2:.Ai 6o
13 B.W-fl . ' O on c. D.00% 2 .0% D 0.. : 0c% : O 2.' . - D -22 elo~osgeA ....' 00k 'Mf'' 4 A~'''" c . '2:2:' 000 WA i>~2: 0.00%( >:22::2::2 0.007k:::22222:oov *:'>C 000% 2:>222:::: 0on 2:::: 0Ss OWA
23 0... ,T*:'X %%%' 000% D'" 0 " ;.:' 00"* ' :'" : *:: :.:. I:"D'':.'.:0% ' 000% *'' * 0% .. ::*"""' 0.00%3~~~~~~~74 ceoc'co00 7.b.'" 00% .'..'' 0 W. ..... 0 : . : o.o :2.: c.o.::. . o-A O.:.:::. O::::.:::. o.:::0.0.. ..
20 .rcg d 000% ''b.. 0% '':'2: 0% ''2" c nA::::2222 -.n 22::::222 Do.22::::22 0% .00 -X .% 2:.I. DO, .... A 023 :'.:'":' 0 :: . . :o o
20 OCh M NC AC ';00 2: ' .07 >X 2:0% D »:. ~ ,0 ~ 2 :222222 .n 2222:::::00% ::::::22 .0 225 :0% O22222.» .0 2..2:24 007702c...'ccr 00 09 '..2:2:2::2:'.'.' o00, ::'..".'2:2:.'. ocon.. 2ii::::::222 0..0. 2:i!!2:2.o. .~..~~:2i:.~.,~ i : 000%.''i....2 :!2!i..~::' ?.% t *: i:i:: .i*% *1 '. O A 22»:.~ 0.*0i:-.
3~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........31 OCte. OHXYW ::::::2 .0 »»> 0% »2N4 0 »:: 000 2:22222:00% 2222222:00k.::22222 0% '''A'' 00D ''>:0.0% D 2:. '22 .O%
1i..i:~1'., RI#. iTii6i 0o.21A D M i'..! 0o0k ".o':ooi.:':::::::- ----- *"am ~ " ,, a~~xr ~ ,,.,~, ,,x~ww o~ww ,, ~ D~Co14.:' 0o eotCC !:0....A..:. :....:' : 4 on .: ::.::2 : .c:2:... ......... : ::"'
34 Oco.c, cqc ...- ::' con 0 "':' .07%':' ..... :.: D,.% .. ..... 0o, ... . ..- i o o D. : ..0c027 4'i'24':'-'> - $4
ccC clk. ccOM lcU Do A3 00 "'2"'"' on D ::22::2' .on 22> 0.0 D2'~.'.2:.:c n .:.":2 o 2".:::'00%%.'::: o :::::::0
D,, D..% ...% O.-% O-A,.f.m, D. S. Dcfc4. ce. O4Y cddUi. On ..... O.o co :.22 00% 4::222 0% 2>.. 00% . . ... 0% .. '.00 '"2 . .00% *>+44 .00%00 DC.c'ceilc.0 5FL99 "onO.'."'.': 0M07 D"2':4 ?.A4.:222:::2 %.A?'A22:" ."00% .2'2":.2 00% "': 31" 0% 2:2 . ..o.:::222:: A0141S Cleeelcetcc%'V ' 0007k .'.>'.2:':2: 000o '..'.'. .'.'.' 000% 2::'.'.:'.'.'. co .... :
.4""': c.c """."/"' 0 " ' 0 .:'.' o.on :::..''ii:.:. .00042 a.d,,.c.,. e.A .0.. .. : D. : D. o ... ".. o.on 2 .n 2"':::: o ..n ..:>:2:.0% A 00 k '2.2 .% ..! :4':':: 00:
43 hote.ejcictck00042 00A o n O k 5522 23% ::::O222 ..0% D/"'::": 0% D2112:25 4*i .20% >< .n »224-044 C · ..'.ic DOc A'..:0.00% .*J 4._.'. 02% 00 2:' .' .0:% 2:... %..O.:.'... 0 '.'.'.'.. .... 2'.*. . .A..v.. . .'.....'',
.. ~.. IND.- D-' '2..O.... .. -KY .0.3 '.:"..' ..'.0 % .:.:'.'.::2:.:.: o.on :::»:o ooo .:::2:2:.:: 0.00% .::2:2:2:2:: 0.on '.:::i..:2: 005. .':'.':4 . 000%'.':..2:'..:: :o56Bpr ~.op ,,~,1 s .~d*~,Z~p 5.;D,~.,~,,,n~~~~do,~ . oo
sg Declm~ AL : o~:~~~:~ooDo:. .A o :. �%..9s:::::::.': ,,.. 000 D O D.."4."0..'2':."0 .c.'~ ~" li~"-'~{i:""< ~~~ .~"~ ::~._~J~ °*~'~ :~!:::i'~ ·.- : :'.:- o.,.mw ~. .:',~:::! o,. !.%.!.-r o,~o,~ :i~:~:""', D::i:.o.72 FW la O..,.A O D!-i o .-."iI. o.,,:i . D-. o.~ :~'Do.~'"'':~::.!i o" ~:~'~~!~0"" 0i-! i':/ o"I- : i.::~ oo. .!':!!o. i.:~!'~i D.%50 Cch. 2 0.0%0 :21*2:: i4 +O "+" no .:22D..2.. o 424>D 000 4'.:'...2 000.... :» 0.0%..:>...% 00%'2::'2::2 ..00'.%:'.D22:: 00,, Ilould~~~~r~l~~nlrao~~llC O swr, S '" ooox ~~~~~~:~:~:~~i'.:2:422:2: 007k 00% """" 000
1 2ft .1. .cAAd . A.0- 2: 1.2:i$*2$-AK. .'A t .*.OO ... 'Aw ..... / ..i'% *5* '595' 452. ....... 0 o 0 .... m. ., ~b,,.c~., ,m
57 Dytco0.4.0. 000% 2:.>'*5.'2: .00 44»>2:' 00% 444444 000 221222:22:42 000%00% ''D*" 24% 2:"OD.00% "'.:2O%.'000se Dcpco'spco~~~~~ieieOOH ~: 0.00% ::'. ,'::':' 0.20%. :*:"""*:' 000e "'::*'""':,. 0.007 4:'*:::2:2 00A::**::':: 0.00% ,*':-'''",%on :»*':: 0.00% :'2929!' 0.N*% ':".:',%* 000~% ""*'2':"'* 000%
59 , D:.'.t.' 2 .,0. 2 S.." :' .'.... ... .... 2: : .'.'.: .. ...% ... .:.' 0:;.
~ ;~;mN ...% D.. D% ...~. :..- Om% ~~..... :.. : : i! ...:+ :[.::"." ~;.2 : :~::"'.:'.": . oov . 4:S:J:::.~~ o :!::~:2::.::21.~.2:i2:"::"" : : 0:00%~ ~:::~::: . -.::.:'.2:,;:.." o ':.'.:'.'
01 cectice~ 22::22:24 00% 25*94: 1% »'» 2 on 4''24>2> 007 ''.2.. 007k '22:22::2:D.0% 555:22:2 000D<'15244 0.0% »>..::2"0.07 2::22:22::2021 ALc~4 'I W" % "':W' 1% -on:::::2 007 ::222222 0 DD'k ..WA2» 0WA5>::222 ¶40 2:::::22 0% O22~ 1 2.O% 25::::5 O.-n 22222222 0.0%0 occeoflO n o "'.': 00 :::222 .00% D.::2222: 0% 00O% W2:''' . .On D 2:..~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i o.t~ .o ~o*81 O yI OWA oo : D.-% 0. WA D WA D.ow .. !... aw,1 ,O - [::d.- : : i NC .r::::: ... n D:: : : 43 o.. '.>: : on. ".''007 . .c :::::: : 0.o% :::..:.:':...:: 0. :::::2:2:: .o2:: o. ':.::::::
74 Forte iiPA d~ O i':*:~~ 000/L:%;: .* 0.20% >%.'.':.:.:::: 0.00% »::...**. 000%~ ':''' cn:::: 2::2:: 0./-:.:: 00%" *:.:2:*2:2:2:2: 000%/ S:*
2c37:
2'
:. 2.2.2~* .'::-:*' B0 on .4:.244:::*' 0.0WA
09 ao.::F .i: - KY D., o .. ... n -,O-% K . . 1:i2j21 O0% . .00 2 o 0004%: : '..... con ...... !..,. . .... . ... ~ .::~.2 o.o '.2 :i: 24 c.on
74 Po Woce d ,4 0. : '% ...,4': 0 .. . O n.2:2 :: D.00 :O:2::2:2:2:2: 0 . 0D 2'A :12::2: 000% 2:2:.:2:2":2:2:DWX O~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~..O~ ~>:!:ii 0. ·OPW*-o43 PoI..ON 1 .- 200490. "C D conA "2"" -0A :222s O.% D0 . 2 00% " 0.0 52 0007k '>2M> 0.42% » : o 2 0.00 %77 Fco P00cc-Poet 74 coke FL 2:2:2:2:2:2:2: 0007k 55:2:2:2:2:2: con '.2:.... 000% ' ..'''' con "">"' con 2:"""""' 000% .2:2:2:2:2:2:2: 000% 55:1*55 012% 2:2:2:>"'" 000% 2:2:2:2D2:2D2:2: 000%
70 HcI k, R0 ::22222 D.% 521::2 0 % '''"0% ''''.'' con 2:2::2:2'.2 . WA ":'.. 0WA '''. 00 :.4::222: . ..22..::::0. A 222:::::2 .07,0 X '04ob~Oo FL~i:::ii 0.00% :i:.'\.'.2'.. 0.00% 2:2:2:2:2:2:2: con0 '.2:'.:2::2:' 001..O0 .<i!ii;i .004 2:""''::~e: 0,0o ' ::""2:'': 000o 259~5 .00 1222.:2:2:2.90 ..:2:2:2:2 .O':2:2:2:i::~.~ i ~ ~ ~~5. ..~.~ .;,....
01 P000%0k'kA~~tccU 0,00% cn ''20-5*'' 2762.2:120202:'i~6j'2:2:1212.5:<D0.00% 52:120.252: 26702 ccec H D.- l .1 0.0D4..% ..On 0.02. O..:.::.'..:: 0 WA ::::'.:::00% ..o c 2:'.:.':.2: .o '...:.4.'.' :1 : : .o .::2:2: :::: co. :1212::-:.'::: 0.00%040.o3 OA "'""' co """"".' ckI con D." . c 0 O% '4""': 0.WA :' ... %: . 2..: : -.. . . :: 2:-.::. . .. .:. . .<.>.:.. ...:.:-:.:.:.:212122:'4*.K2:2:11D11-. :.-....:08 -. 0. M DWA O.O.2 0 070 44'>
02 Qoceboec74Melo.Oice00k55Pk4042 ..... C on.2545*521:c47%...... 000k :..2:... 00% "'2:"'. 00% /'' 000% *35 14% "2:....A ...'.:55D2:0.00% 222222452222: OW
'~~~~~~9~~~~~~W· ~~~~~~~~~~ii~~~~~~~~,o·"w ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q ~~~~~~~~~~~lp~~~~~~~~3r~~~~~~~~,~i92 Occ,,el.c 0· %:": ;'':. ' 2::': · 0.:' '""':'; 000' "" "-;*':' '''"2.:'' 000% *:':':':':': 000%-""""' 000% :1212':;':':': 00 % :2:2::'" 0 '2:;:*:%:2 : 00
ono "'*~', ;: 0.,o ::::::::2::::2~o :.A.f1.'.*:::... o, :::.::::oo'::.::::::,oo::'.:::::::2:. 000% :::."'.. 00 :::l1:.'~4S5::::::12e :!.0..:::o.2,22:2:::::!::: o.Do%84 Olim..vi2~~~~o:::::25:2: oo..'.2::%.4.03. 2.:2::2:'!: o.~ i:::.....4.*5..2:35: : :...'.' .-...::'...:
00! Hoilcp..cocC.42cPA0 :::.4:::3':. 054% »>4i'.:>:: A.»'>":- o.on ,~: :..... .. 00. o-'2:2:2:2:2:2~~ : con~ - .i:!:"':2o,~ :2:2:2:::: 0.00%.'':5..:.o. 00 .'.:2:2:2; on. ...2:2:2:..2:.: 000
97 04001004 CT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 D 3% '224,D:4:~, D1%'2
'S2:
:On2244:c0 D 50* 9% ...''/
99 3 -k4000 0K% '2 4'03 2222222 o 2:::222:::. o - D- .00 --555 0.00% 5::::222 ..% '''' 00.,. 22:2 D .n 22222::: 00
Krld Do.k N-] O~I)I Cot~~ul~hrilTY oool o~s~ ~·nrr o~~ow t~3~S~ OW)L ~ji~..MI D -A ...n
...0A.A002007-b4409e0900.1.0200
02 '"~~.2:' 2:2:2:..2:'. WA]J~ Dl~ii-.ld.-~ir~I bi ~ w bici oSi ~ p ~ .·..t::i:i:~:E::::-W.-'.0% 4 . ' ' D " 0 ,,o-..-A0D% "': 7" c 5 0 2 :
10 olk l L O . .04A 2:2: 000% 2...'A 000% » con* 5 : 0.%.."" I~a~nla .11 0.0 O.O O.W O.WM...o D.W*..... 0 o.oDtr I~~~~but-Ci ~ ~ ~ ~ 2:452:2:..S5.2:.2:Ak2::2::2: :::':J a::%51ii1 :~.::: SMw 2:>''<"fl44'4'2'24'.>' "24,24p):::::~~~ .Pl~:::t:~~ .O
204 Jcokeoo 774 Ork "4"."" Don 2~f ':2:2i:2:2:2' 0.... ':2:.::2:..[:2:2::. 00-% '..:2:2~~:.:2o'.. 000!i~ .".-'~.'2':2i':2.:2...~ :2~~ :2: ~ on' :2:2:.:2:i:': o.c Ao '''':'!'" con 'i' !i..". ~ ~.2:2:2: O k :2:::::::207 .:' OW. ''.*44:' :: 30 1::::::: . :LJ(O.'tF .W '.:' '.'7 .:.:: '.. :!i:: 0.' ':::::- ..::'::' ... '' .2:4 ':.-' 0i .:!: ..'t:-~. :~i l.... ~ :i:~:..~ o:.."~ o.. - : ,~ . . O... . . i~i~.Pl : ...
.o4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~r locwer200 3.ckeC~co~k2. 02W ': ::.:::: o.0 1 oon : :: o.oo1 212: :.::. : :::: o.000% 2:2: 0':::::: 5:' o.0% 5 oo55' ': o. on' .'..'::: o .oo. -: 2::::: 000%7a Fon Sn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~co 29*I :: 0e7'A 211*211..c.211521>i 000)4 "W.2:0..10 '.2:2.o09& 2111i%!Ao2 024%~ 2: W '2211 44* 4000
201~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[:: :<c.~c~ 000 '" :' 000 .424:'~ ' ion 44':' :':....'::'"":.:'''.''':::-
'.''.: "
<'::"'-:-:":
<c..:: ::0..:0::.0.%.:.:. .:.. . .::':: .l. .: -. ..:..::.':::.:4..c. : ' .: . . *.:x.. ''. ;
..2:20i.J~~.~~~ccoM0-01 '~"" 0004!? :i9i : " 00014 !:i;,_5>.~!..!S 25*2: OW cn .~ ~:2:2~:2:2.<:2o~:ii.!'io,, i:..: 0.00% , ; :2:.:12:':~ 12% -'. " 134..;:.2:2:...2oo~ :2:::: 0.00% ;2:2:ii:2:.:' : 2,;~1;2:2:2:i o0.,
,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o, j,-~~~, ~ooo~, or o %' oar210 dcn 2 000%~flL "'429* 004 "'2"'0014"'"'0 j ' 0.0014 '22:: 0.00%:4>5+ cr "2". 000% "'':::.M24.2:5::22::2.
-I : .: : ~ · . o.oo ::. o"' " ' '2:.'::::.'.'' ::.oo. :::::::o o:::::
.':':::'..
: :::2:2:2:2:: .o:2:2:2:: o.oo 5
Is osn~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~: ~:::~ o.o~ ::!!!:~ ooo%::::.::~ o.o~ !:[':~i: ooo*::~::: o~or ~:~:::!.: o.o% !:::~~i:~ o ·oo*, .:i:~~i:! o or :-:!:::::i :~: o o, :':::o.,,111 LUkc.4-o b~ecOO.9 FL:~~: 0.00% 1 4..~ 002%1 2::::::: 0.00 :::22222 001 WA 000%· »»>:i 0.00% 2:»4555:i'; .00%~:: ..5 . D 007%~ '-4:22 00 525 0
002 UlarI~Ccce l00 '1W "' 24'k· 2:555 0.0042552122 000k ,'.'.ISf 00 ...0c %.O..c 6'''''00%'..55 OW 000% 55>55>2 0.00%.OU ~,.2 ,~,,~,~.c,.,,, ~ m ~s WY :O·~SI.D LY 9'4~~ ~Y .0*~ D,. ,,,,!: . ...:,- ::J:-: .~:.i!.,. :!:3~:!* .:;::'.:':~ ., Pii!i o.~ '~:;~ .oo 3*ii! o.~ :iPi:~~.!;~ ; o- ~i~:: i:.::::L: :: : . : : : o.o :~$::o,~::,:.::o.,:,.:i!:~,o ::::~::: on ,. ~i:,.:::oo~!,:::~... ':i!~~ .~:.~:..o~,.:;~:.: .:as H!rb"~`.~ 4~!~:~!~:~;A . wii< :u~!!!:!:: I~~i bi!'i~ ~!: iil!i! ~: : i T:iii.ioi~~i~:~ ~:i!~!i : !::!~ ~~..iii'~~~ ii!r*i~~~
f.~:.::~: .o~::;:~: ' ;:;ii-.'i : o.~ ;~~~:::~oo,~.':::~:: ..,::;;i.!..:~ io~ :;i:. ~.~o. ~::~.i.: oo,~!3i.:;i .~ :!;..e: oo
~21 Z. ad-,Mt e rW H~nv u~w 1~i~oo~oo~ oo ow om9 NP iCi~~: oe:~:..:::oo ~ !::.!~!~ o o.~ ~:~:.~ .. ~~:~: ~:~:~::: .L..::::::::: o :::.:::o. ':~I:~.:. . .i3 o·? :I~;9 i:!:~::~:.: 0oo.~ :~:~!.!: o"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;:::::~oo :::::o,e~ .!:!:!ii ~o%:::.4~:~o o~~::~:.::io,~:':::~:::ooo :~::!!i o ~::.:!::oo :..:::::o, :.'::::: r
81The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
'A . 1. (WY ATil
0.00%(
O.OOU~~~ OW~~ o.~..127~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DW l0sJoaK ~i ~ '-'-~o.2oX L..o
ooox~~~~~~~~~~~o~129 L.tleRo-ld Littl Rok'EN AoO=. ...
27 1-81. KY O= 0.37-A O..% -.onO.WW ar)·
o~~~oor ~~~~~5~~~"6.001 ~ o ~*O O On, O_ O:. A L ~ OO~f
DJIU ;r O.WY o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~my :ooo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo,1~ Icbbl' TX .,,'0O0O°~ O
.. On iO.-A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: OGn
~99~. L ··· · ~ O .. .... .
O On i dtix§w* Af t rr :
o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o,*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o.oo~ ,11Mercd4 Om i ',:.".'~ i~O O~~~~~i .5%...W.1W FL 0.000·* 0.00'~
~iOO 0 00~~O.- .. O.O.*0:666i .o%
O."'A I 10Z~~~~~~~~~~~OW149~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.1 Moei' .~ AL'. OX.0
1. WA O..% O-% O-1 ~ Lm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-- ,,y,,,. sO O- OW!O=
:~~~~~~~~~~~o.oo,&143 Nha o.:0% ....OOP On O.- 1. .. 24-.A00% I O .O
o~~~~~~os* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o~~~~~~~~ww~~~~ 0.0 oVw16~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A# 9? A O'A dCA .-
........... -.'A 2.11-A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o?~
RMC-3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O.0O-$~ .. .W - IT..I7 ...t-pkt OL O..%OO'AO.
117~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.- O~e 14M A o.o
is2 0o-e CAT o.. .oo%
·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3- 4.t0t. "O"C , -'AcTX ? AUM-~~sp~ -u OA 0.00%
189 J~~~~~~~~~~ve~~~~~e-S~ ne~~~~~~~~~~~~nudmo CA~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 0.o
W --I C-Dl~ CA M o--oo%.O'a Os FL CA.On
203 $mt~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O. i Fe. 5,,, .0
~o?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~kn Ocmo-~k BL-On ~ .O
~;::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On M::~::!:W21 c~ -~e~ ~Ol O W/,d~
212 rvd~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O,q~ jU.: o oo'
:;'.~.'~.'~'~.':~-~.'~.'.':~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ : ..., :. O... . :. .... . . . .... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~............ .:...:: ::~::::
-A O..-A ...O-A O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~on ~~~ 0 .0%
219 T.~pA-St, pet mb~,,O e uw u t FL~'4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 't'vc% O.O o o
228~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~12- v.O -'1 O ai l. Npt A0,n
1.57%.. 2.~A O.00% 0.0-'I 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
O..%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0.00% OO' -2~7 OYs% O.On2 -- 9 CA~ P.7A O.- A : .O
97m~ T X [ : po
82
Appndix 6Geor.phic C-ncn ios -2000
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Apph 6en G..g':pl~ Cnertns -2000
!~ ·: : : : ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ..: i
X4-M, ~~~~~~~~~~~~... : o
K. .......... O..%................. '~~" " ''";'~;io.~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P ~. ....................................'"'""' ''':'~~I.'.i....................................... . ............... . ..................................... <~.~ . 0 . . ...
~-'~ " ' "'~'~~~';'~~.:~~~ : . : i~io~oo'~":::::::::.::~~~~- o o(~:::~: o~:::~:::oo~x:: .,A -.. v.:: O:.:.'-:.::: o oo ~ ~ ~ ~ . :' ~'"'~' "~'"~ ~:~'~'~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- .':ii:nii::~i~ii o.~?.:~~:~iii ~,:::~:.::! ooo~ ~i!?.:K: .o~ ::~:...: oo, ~ii~~iii~o o- i ::i.:!!.: 'o !~!::<i~:'o~/ i::::!i.:":
~]...:::::(~ :i?:iii..'!!~.~::~ii~:!i:q. '~:::!'':~!~:*~::!!:::.''.'i::!i~:!i!:::.~~!::::~ i:.''!.~.~' ~~::i~!:~.."~ !~! 'O:.''. :!i~:::::::::: ~::~:::o,~::::~:: oo ::!:i~io.~~4i:~ ..~!::::i:~: o.~ ::::;::.:o ~~4i::::i:o,. 'iOii..i!*o
:!:;i:'?.':::o o.~:::::::::::o~% :::::~:::: ..~ :::::::.~: ~. ::.:::::: ..% :::::::::i ~o~ :i~!..":!!:o..~ :!i. ::.:....:. .... ~~:o,........ ... '' : :WiK!~ . !i~~'ii oo,..!~~~ .,fi~i.:'io ~i!~l:." ~o~ .i!ii!;~ o i~iiiiio ~ i~::.: o~::::i: ... ~:~~~i~.?~~::.?.....i:~~:..~.~~::~::.!`"..:::~~') , :::~~:.! .~i!:i::M .. ,i''i!::~~ o
~:.,~.i! ~.:~~L":~~~! i"'~.~ ~':~~i~~i~~. ~~:.':~: .~.i~:'~:":"'! i~i~~:i i:~-~.~i.~ i::'.:ii~' ' :'. ii~~i!~~! F~: i~ ~:''! !~!~~~": i!ii i19iF~":::::::::::~..::.: , :-:::' . o.o..:A: . : : ::ooo, .::-:oA..:::..: o..Ai:::ii:: ..-,.:.A~:':: o. .:~i:::'ioo.:..:.:.. 0.(:::::::o...:::~:.<o~ ::::::~,ov :~~:. o~:::::::' o., .:::::':: o.~.:'.. : o.,::::::: o.
~i!:~ii?: o,, i~:'i~ o,~ :::::'.'.:~i ~. ¢.'':.!::: .~ ~'.:i!::!i: o~. :!::~~i!: o i ::::..::.o...:..: : ..:...... . . ':i?.:! oo.::'i!!i:: o, ~:::'io ~~.:::~~:o~~~.:!i~:o.o~...~ii:::: o~:'~i~~ito, ~i!ii."i , i::~:::o o !i.:K:: o.
:~:i~:::::· ~:::::o~::~~~:'.:~e~.~.:~i:iii. o. c:::::::: .oo, ::::::::: o.( :::.:::'::: o~:ii~:~~iW~ o., :::~::ii1:':::.::.::: ~o,~::::~:::::oo.; ::::::::: ooo/.:~::~:::o~o,, '<::~.~ ~, :.:.:!:::,o., :::::<:>~ oo. .:'i~~ii~ i! ~.,.:~i~~ii~~i~,o.
.::::::..'.'.:* .: ...:..::: .:....::'~~~'' ~~i:.:.!iii!...;:~ 'i:.:ii ~i~ ~ ..i~i!Ii?!i. .. ~~.Ii.`i.:'.i~~ ̀ .i~`.!i.:~~.~ i ~.'. ' ii''-.~:::::::::o ,::::::::: o'/ :::::::::o~Y.''~:::::*oo/.'::',.::: oo :......oo'.:''''::::*oo~.'A ': . ':..' : : ""::"oo
i~~i![:iii o.~ ~::!!i:! ~o ~i~~:~~:: o, :ii:'i~i~ .~ :!i::i~~! o.' :~i!.~..: A i'..':..:oo 3. ii0% i ...o-,A :i W~ii::i0...~:.:.,..:~~~~~~~~~~~..'.':o' :::.::::: 7. ::::::: .~. .::..:<:;09.), Lim:::!:: 1.. o5. ::..::::: 81 ~?~:~-': 3~ :.52ii!}~o,,:i::~ii
i~~ i~~i:' ~~~i¢~~!:'iii.ii~~i..~./.:.: :i~~i.t"~.L~.:.'i~iii.': .:~:D~':~~.~ .~~:..~~'~.~ i:.'.::.:.~~ : 0..:::::::::..::::.:::....:::::::oo...:::::::..o,~~ :.:::o o~ iiii:~ o.oy ::~i:::o~.(:::::::::oo/.::::.:oo~:i:::ii:::o~./ ::::W:.: ~e.; ~::::::::: o~ .::::::::: ooo~ :::.:~:: ov,::::':::::: ov.::i~.~':: ,''~:i'.:!~::i0o~ Uiin$ iO:..o%.
:::::i:::::i~~i o.~, .. 2.! ::'~~~oo * :::8!. ,, ::.X : > ?. !::.. : ,'~~...::: ':',t,'::,,,~:::''::,, ':~-i!:A.!::~..:~~:)~~~~ ~;i! )~~i ~ii ...i:''~ ii::~ii:.i~~ "~ ~~:::~~,j.:~'~q~i ::'::.-.':''i .:.A " . -::'i::A::i :' - i !':::.:i :',- J.v.,~...v.... %.:... ... ::...... ~.:..... *. ...:... . ........::......:.::.... ....~.. ··...........:::...~ . ~ ... ::.:o o/ .... ':..o.~::::::.:: ev :::::.¥oo.~¢:.., ?~., ::.::';:io..:: ::ii::oov ::::::: Ao,
.::::::::o-..:.:' ¥: 2A : .:.:1. oo.,2!":::::o1A qi.~,:" 2,v i':::~: .o..'::.::::o-~~:.::::i!0o, ii.:.~~::~oo/
km~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~: : '..-... ... .: .-.......::::::::::::.',:..~::':...:.....::.·':::.:::::., .::...::.:.`.:~:.:::::::.. -::'`A M:::.~.~i~:~.::iic::~..1i~~
.*......... o. ..v. ... o. .< o a. :<.oo.¢...,:0 % .::... oon . . . 1D'~ '.-...
-~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~:'::::::..%- .' .-A ..% ::::::. ·. . .:::::::: .2....~i".:::::~.'~::::::::::.~:f~:I:i~':!.:K:~:!i~!)~:~i:*~~:~::I:I::::~;:.:".~i-":::::L::i;i1 :.'A: .. ):i:):mi.:ii :.: :.:2:'.~~
:~".'::'!: ii~~ii~~i! ~ :)i::::!i~: oo,,.,::::::: o~ '.!:;i:.:'i2 o ~.~ .~~ii~:.:i! o0~ .':!.'':::::: ~o~ ::?:.:':: ::ii!-."i.'ioo;i:i:::,,/ ::'<:: 0*:i~':::::,o,!i!:i)!:om~:ii:!~i:oo~:~;.:i:oo~:~~~:ii o,::ii :: o..i.::y'io'~:i~~i:'..'::::: % o,. :::..::. o.(::::::.' -,, ::::.::::o 'i:::::::ooA: q::..:::oo, :::.:::' o :[:::!! ~:::jl'''i~ ,m,:i!!.~::.",..:~i!i!:!....:.i:::K:...~ :i~~:!i .~.~i.'i:::o...j~!:i: ..,~i:::~i oO.::::. %~ .:.;;~~o
i~i~::i::ii::;m~.*i~!:~.:!::.:;f~ ;::i~~ii~i:!:i~ ~~:: !:i:.'~~i ~:( '.'i~.::~:i~~i:;~ '.'j.3~;i!::.~:::.'/~ !:~i[::.?:~:i::'t.''~~;!~::[~i !::K.'":¢~.~: 1i: :5i:~'.i~:::::: o :::::::: ,. ::::::~ .~::::~::: o, ::~iii~ o :!iii'::"~~.i~::~ i:E~;'~:ii'::'"'A' : : : : ii :oM-:!::::::i ~o ::::::::: o-,:::::::::: .o ~::~!::: ~o~~::~..:..'ooo~i~~i'':~i o~ ~.i:~~i:o.-.,*::i*:o~!!:: -A: ~ oo::-iii::: o :::~ii':oo . -A :::oo.,[?iiii ? ~::~:'iioo~ i::..:O o.~.::~:.i': ' o Ai[i::::o~:~:.:: ,'i~~i:.'!!iiii..~~iiii..~~i L..~ i!.::i~!ii~F.~:i-.:iiii~,~ j~..:~: .: :~J ~ .!iiiiiiL.:~. , .f.iiii'iii:~~ ii!ii::! i~''~.~:.% !~:i ::~~~
.::::..,::.:: ooo. :::::::.':::: .~ :::?::?.:::: o~~ !~M:~i:: o o ~?.:!::.:::~:o~-~::'.'.!i'-.:~:'o~".~i!:!::i:?'~o~"::.i:::i~:K~ik~od' : ...!!i[' R'ov i iN ::: o, .::!O!f o.( !iiii t o o :~i~::" ,, ~ :: ~,'i:!i.: o~ ::!:::oo.,i:!!:.i o.~.ik[~:' -;!i::ii~ii ~..i~:~iK:io o~ :~.:?~~:" oo~ ::ii::.::o o ~::'!:!i:ooo i:::i:'. ,o :::!?!:::- oA: i::::!.. o 2:.'!i. i 1 2,.!:0i::0 o.(~~~~!i o. i:iii!iioo~~iii':ii o~~:?.i: o~i:::':oo~~~~:.'.:o% !.iioo.ii::~ o,RR ~:in . . .-i Mi%~".!iii!~i~~...'.~~:!~~L:~ i.:~ :.~...':!..'~~ ~ ~~::.~.'.A~~~.ii..:f:~~~,: ~.!! '.'i.':::: . . %~:~:: ~::.:
:::~::":::::::i o~~oo .:::::::o.. :: : ::: . ::::::. o. : :..:::... .o. , : : ih.'::ii. oo:.::i::::o. :::i.:,o.J: ..O''.. . Ao~~;::::<!::i:o.o. :~i::".:i!o.o. :..i::K:o., :~ii::i:::~o~,. :::ii_':i:oo. :::ii~~::o.~,:-::i~:ii::o~o :"ii::iMI ,ooA : : . : ':":. ,'
!~::i::!:.?.'m...":~::ii~i:...'.' :ii::ii:.'~i.o,.~~ii:i::i: o,, ~:.i~~ii~~: ~.~ i~~ii~:!~ ~~ ~!!:!:i .,. ::i~!i~~ .o~,:-iAii::Ci o,,;ii::~ii~~:~~ :-':iii::~~.:'~.i i!::::::':~'~~!:~:::ii.:::..~~.,~.:.:~ !:::--:.'-.* -::'-."A : : : ! i~~::.ii::.'A : . : i::.: :::.''~''! i .: .". :: -.:A'
:::.!::: o~ :: ...::oo, <:::i!,,~ ~.::"iij"'~;.~i::i..::o~~.::!~i::~''~:i~:~' ~?~;'":A::~i ',.'.u...c.'i~,,!~~i~:i~ii .~~,::i::-''!:: ... ::~~:::!~: oo.~~:~i~~:.'' ,', '."~~::i~::!.o.~ .~~!:;!.".oo., i~~::~:..:! oo-.:. ' . . " ' , ' ii." !~ ,.
L"WA!.: !.~O..-iii:i..;:~.:.i. ~!i~.~.~."'i !,,"::'..Aiii!! . . . ....·...'!..A i!.."~..' .~~~~! ... :~i~~i .~iii !o,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :O('.~i::.::::::...::::...o.'....:.::...o.::::::::...,.::::::::.~o.:::~::::o~o.~:::::: o'~::::::: oa/ :::::::: ~/
!!~i.''iii."'i! o~, !::!~::~: ,o~'~i~~::~~: o,,~,'~i~~..:!~i o.~ ii!~.ii~ .~:!."...~~i'.: ,~:i~..:~:~ o.-: i ::~~:.ioo., ::i':c .-io A.:::::::: .o/.:iii!i:oo ! ' : :.~i .o~~::!::~o~ :::::::: % W:::::A ooii::~!~i:o~! ~..' . i U:.4:::o::..::::: X.o., ::W::::::Io, ::::::::o .'iA ii:" , .. .WA : :.~:i .o: i~~~!!i.% :!:::i!. .,A :!iii . "...":,,~;i:::%ioo
~i~!~~i~`:[:~:!~]~~i~:~~i~:~!~ii~i~: !~:`~i~i~:~:~ ~: ~`:~*~` *~:~~:*~*:~:.O.~.::::::::::::. ::'~..:: :::::::::~ ~ i:~ci.:...:::o.oo~ ::.::y:::: ,,o,~:~:::::::: .o.~ ::~~:~:: .,.~ :::~i:!.'::oo.,:!A:". -' 2..,
-.WA''' " O (o,:iii~~~~ ~, :::~:::o~~ ::::~~~ioo~..::.':! .,. ::i!i~~oo !::~~~:,,. i! i .! o~...'.'i'.~ ~.-':::::::oI .:.:4,,:::::::! ~~!!!!!~?.:o,. .:i?!ii:,o~:O:iii .,- A : ' : : !..., ii':~~:~ .o~ :~'"~iiio,~
!~::::.:i ~4 :::.::::': .o. :::::.:.: oo,~:~~::.'::~: o~ i:.::~:.: o~ ::c::::c: oo, ::::..:'::: oo, ::!::::: ,o0' . . . . (oo,.:..::..:..::.~!'' .::::::::::.'........:.:::.' :::.............::...:..-:.....:. v.:...:....:c:..:..::.v .......:..::.... , ~..vv .... ,.~.:ii:.:.: .:.O..%..
83The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendi 6Geogrphi C-n.tiom. -2000
O---"
..............
O MO.% 2.73% ...n O.%-A
............... O. -A -A
1.13% O.% m%..% OO=
O..% :: O.% O o..
-.-% ij: -WA O..% -'A A% ..0%-,W%: ..% O..'A O OA O..% O'O.% O.W'4 ..O,
'02,2 O..% O..% O..%
-'A
O.% 0M i: ....% O..% 0.O..% MM 1 O'.%* I- O O.%-'A O.% O..% OO,0 ;iw.-
.. ......... .........-A O O--- O
K O.-O .,. ".:'.*;-xI O---%
.............-X ...O% ..00% O -AO ::::.:.Z;:.:! I..O% O---% .. % O..% -OO%
'�X+X;% O M �:4050:;: 113% A'A ki:j: ..OO-A O..% O..% O.,.^ MO..% ...'A O.qq� 0X", O..%
0, 'A .O.'A OO...% O ..A O.on O..% i:::.:
$:X: O O'A O---% O %A;... ........ O
O'A O OIIA ...O% O.OO%O% .... % O O%-0 1.0% O OO IN. O. K.O _/' M2;:;:'-:::: ...O% ..% O_.-A...... PAM.
O O---% M-A O..O On O OO.A .... % O X:O,-M 11 85-A 1.0% O .-I O...", X.: WA 1.31.O.% 'R - ':
O .'A
OO---% 0 -A
............ 2.82% ON. .............. .....X.. O..% O.On O -A
O..%O..% 0O..'A OOIA O.152-A O..% OO . OWA 0 'A
"NZ: X O -'AO.On O.OO'A O..% ..n -.-O-A .,W% ..-AK OOx.m.". O---% O..n O..% O....,.... A 13.53% 24 0 0-A........... 1. WA-W _se 'K:
O W.O..% O.000 -AO.110-A 5.83%
AO. O.OO'A .V-A
M.% O..'A .... A O.'A'A $.N.-N.; O O---% O .'A 0 ..A O
O_-'AK.* O.- O -A - % O -AX.M.N.M.O .'A 'A O'On 'A..........
Zxxx; ..O.% O..% O..-A O-.M
::.:X:::SZ O OOIA 0,.-',4 O O0'A :::0::::::::: O.00% ..O.% O. -AO.-N 'A O..'A O, -A ..O
O..% O..% O -A"..2XI ...A I -'A O 'A O.% O..'A O..%
M O..% �::X:::21.�' O .% 0 OO%',:' .' O---% O�.O' O_...... .... ........ .......... O-A
O..% O M. O.-A O..%O --% M-A ..O 0 WA O.% .... % O .'A..O.IA
.... A 0 .7, O41%O-% O On O .'A O ..A O-% 'i:........ ....
O..% -A O -%n O .00% O..%0.-00% O -,AO O'A O.-% O_.% O. 0O-A O.-A i: 0. O-A -%
. ..........
O ..'AO..% ..Oft OO -1. - 'A
O.% O--- i: O..-A O..%pirh. W, :. iAM
O..% 11.20.
O..% O---% O---% _AO ..531,mn.
O...A .... A '�: .... A O. -A. -%- A 11, OO% .... :.,: .... A "..'A : , .... A - 'AO - .,.% ".001A O-AX ...% O...
...... .q.99A. ..9 ?PM. i: ARPM.4 �I'A O..% :-.;2
O - O---% I--- O 411..A O.O.% 'A 'A O O-A O 00% WX O...An O..%
I
E I D O O O S ¢ ;J o _,o o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sS-.
84The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 7
Geog:,phic Con.centations -1999
, Z*ML4 595% i~j~~::. 3. 0.... {itI--
0
O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.Oe3 -hOH 17000% ~~~ 000% 000% *.'~~~~~~*'* 000 00A~~~oo.OH :*,*. 000% 000% *. :*.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x:*:*.* ~~~~~~~~ 0.00% I -10400.21i 0 00 ..w o .... ..,..*::~~r::. o· .00% 0.00%~ o.o o.00% >X:. .oo 000%Aft q q.. MW 0.17-A ..AY O.O~f( O.OOU O.O 0.000.00· .00% O·1 . 1 A 000% ...x 0.00%
0I10l-1.005.00 ..... .0 .37% 0.0.,20% 0% O.M
U A&. IC 2.51-1. M% 00%nlul~~~~~~~ ~ 5.0% 0.000% 07 AO~loo.oo-E~Uc ooio PA .0% OW :i 09 O i::.i. 0.00% .00% 0.I 0.00 Slo 000%i~i 0.0% 0A0 W.. ALo.' .::?.: 000% 0 . 0.0% 0.00%
01 100110010 50% o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.*:~ -0.00%Od.,~~j~ir~~:~~i~~6j~i~~i~~i~:~~00 OoO%::.::::~::c:~~s a.~ 000% ~ 000% : 025%,4..:000%;.~..::~...: 0.0
.00%A - S.e* T. OAi :
02.OOX AooOO..AJ. s~oau o~~o~u ··i5·;f~ -A0'14100.oo. ISA.00 D .$ . 0.00t 000~I~B 000%" 000 C·:' 0% 00%: S5
2, awwz. UT~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 17 Auo-oA~ O.A IASC *.. ... % I D..00 o~j.So 000., 00.0 $w:r .4 g~ ~ IOWAD 1f0k7 D* 0 0.00% 000% SOYA %$ 000% 0.0%(
28 B'._0_ ALP -A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000& 00b::0t1..oo:'.::.:. .....'... 00% 000 .' . O" 00qrnO· 55 IA 0 Mi22 00000OolgoLtb).- A 5........- ' .193. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. I.00r M 00
71 B~~~~~lu~~lM,-eoII~~~~~~~hl~~~nt ~~~ 0.OP~~~~~ D.DOW ~~~~~~~~f~~ OWY ~~~~~ D.D MI M304 00000000..0.00% 003% .2 .0 :-A.. .0 :..! O..% 0o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~o~ oo*
...sU. 0 WA l 0.00% :.:.1::::::: 000% 0.00%0.00 00T% ..O . 000. ''.: s 0.00% 0.00% 0,, .00% 0.00%
3. F.D. NY O.M% I -'A 1 . 0I&~:00%~.:..:: 00% ::::? 00%~:*:1:00. ~ ~ 00 00O ':>00%:.1.. O00 ...Y 0 00% ::.:X 0%000%~ .X1X .1: .0000% .. Mo I o. oo0%)I~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ 000%Cpl 0.24%~obbi. 1X.;''. 000 ·1 072 53%*.:::::~:00.1 ~ 00%:.... 000 000CO~/O ii :w.-Op I-u'. O OS0.0~~~~r* P.11* O.WU O.1)Y ).(IW ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O.W~~~OWX o~~~~~aou ~~~l0.0./,2Bon-~bult~N. -LxwUrLoe.]Mo 5 ~~o~ol
ow~'iii33 BoldIer0LoOgm 000% : 00on. 037 !:.:. 002% . 0.00%
3 0% M % 0 o o~ o~ o 7 X ..'.'.'.'. '. ' .. O O'. O %.
.. .~~~~~, O00~~~~~0 ................ 0.00 ~ ~ ........... I.2 '37 eyo-oCoOlel 0S0llio n. TX ... .... .1~. 0.00% .1.X.1 0.00% 0.00% ~:000%.00% .1.1.1:: 0.05% ::::::.:.:.::. 0.00% I 000%30 omoo.Ol.·in-Boo l P.O NY .o.000% o117o1 0.0 1:1r 0.00%o~o oor
31~~~~~~~~~~~' $~u%$6o~ 0.001~ O.O .::.:::: O.O:0:.0 .~ ~ :~~$~ 00 f;001 A.00 .0%::0040~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~.i 00000000 .p.000 .""00' 000%:· .'.'.'.Y0." o~~~~~~oou~~~~~~~~~i~~~ o~~~~~oow ~~~~~~~ ooor ~~ ~ 0 o38 B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M,uo*sr I~ -'39 CtoWo, ,,-,, .lo, O~DO ii'o oo
(1 hulmrrr~onh(~but~n~a BC L~o o.'.'.. 0.00% ( 00 '.~ '.:l 0.00 *.::::. 0.00. ~Si 0.00% .·%,.1 00
Id luIL 'A 2N1,, ~ ~ ii00%d 0.4% 0.0%I 0.0 1:7'. 0% ..'. :. .. .20 .00% .02 OIlesot.04Nott Chuieltae SC i:*0U:
TN-K Inss M~K-,OH~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 MOOA..3UP~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.oo% .5- I9 25%vdt.d-35L% : omn.F1. i0. ..
5, C,,~,~,~,,L .......~2 r .e a~bu, -- A.AJs·:· o~~oar owu o~~oor ~:~!~~:~:~~ oos* o.oo53 Co1.U ,1 OHUs%: A 1
I.M" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. oo%57 Df.onl ecn 1~ ~ +oo~~~ ~w w ~bi~:0I40 ISOOoOO.O5 plo0001oTN-KY 00% 000 ODW '. .... .W 0% .:.X* 0 ..00M, %
59 DClur S AL 61~~~~~~~~~~~W 0.'.99.·..: 0.3%X.:* 00 ::~ :~: 0.'..*. 001 00 '..1:.X1XOltP::::. 023%;S:;i! o**'.' .::::000%../::X.:..~ .. :. 0..007;;::0.i.~ 0Ei:::I..40 IroooO 0005 .990. 25% 03% % 000.1. ...... O.W 0.00% LOtl 01.( I w oo50......OSC...- ..... -... 'IW621:1 ~0 D00 0.
0..0 >111:11 0.00% I 00%. ..>11155 0·.1 0.00%(I I~~~~unUIHad~~~~~~~r~~hFILY O.WU~~~~~ '.'.. Ij 0.0014DW oo.''.'... 0.011 1..~o. .W .: O5l .111...0 % 10 0.00.1 .W11111 0.00% 0.0% 0I0% . 0.00% ,.. .O-.0.00% 1.1:1.1.1 0.1.1.'...'. .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00o
507 I .A OM. 00MI% A *3O disKmelHe DernIJy ..- oo
A..IC.. ttetem q00 DooO~oooo IA~ 000% '.**'Y 000%'.''.'..' OI l 1'2 D.O141'.f".100 O...: .02 I~aclSC 000.00010 ..10o.. O*.:>: *'*"'.W 0,00%~~~ ·0~10~.~ 00.00%i0M0.30% OW "~'.5 .o WY 0,00% i 0.: O 1.94i.0.- 007'1 0.::00..o:0. 0 ooo 1:~*: OWl
47 los. PA--P- 00% 5'.Ld. IL M 0.05% K:11 . 000% .A 00.0%F05 Skh0o00o0 AR-OK: 002 ': ~ 00% .>.o.. 00 . 00 .''''''' 00 :~ 1 -'0,0% 11111%111 M.0~~~~~~~, po.,f ̂ zltr ~'".0.00% :111111115 .00% '.~.****~~..:'.~t:'. 0.00% ~ .00% ~.::.:07.:.0.00%177 Iron~~~~o~akn n~~~udr~~ L ~ ~ D.W* c~~~oo·* ~~~~ o.~~lY O~~~-C~ ~ :~N I 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~.00
73 Fxn. ~ SC A..T70 - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~..'... ..v.'.o....14641~:1111:.11.~ M G72000000000 Sc.000 % 0.00% ~ 000% ~ ~111.1-1.1.; Fort.1.1.1.1.111 Smith1111:1 10.00% A o~~oox o~mw ~ o~wx o~~oau~:~ o~oor~:~~:~:~::~:~ oo. oo
? o lln c ITLm~l.lInOW o~~~oow ~~~~~~ ; swu ~~~~~~~~~ OD01( ~ ~ ~ o oo
I.N .... hi o..010t:.: . ' MI..A...o... O l....... .. 0% 000
0.0 .1dL- NC .-M% 1 .111.1. . . o 0 00000o: 0.00%" :
1.k. MD-JAN I W~ oll :o~u oooA j:; X. r ~ or ow -~~'."A..~. .17%90. D.10.11M6. 0%o.,M~y~ O..% LO)X O.M% "M Mo.007 10115 0.03%1AoN O.1:1:1;:',11110.00 1 .111111 0.00% 0.s0.~0 0.01 . ..~ - .111010*0.11 0.7.11:111111 .0 O0%
81 "2 ~mki ]
02 Ho.bCA PA O1) 0.41'..0 % 0,0%001.1>. 00%-. 0. %., ..0.iii00% '''"o.o %0 .lco
.ILI 000.% 1 1 0 1 1 0-'1 0.00 *A 1 .004WU IS.0.wo00 000. oo.1'ol'.' ow* o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.oo%00 IS d4A W-Y0O I0'0k.1 M05 1. I''O.b .... 'OAh>*0 % >: . ..-.... 02.A
I2 H-.M, AL .52% I -A~ ii~i
·7 ~ndC J,~o o.oo V,ow07 d00,..ph. IN s:1....1. 1111111 X00U . 10 .0%' .0 00, I''.11 0001000
.0 0 0% .11.. ,m00% ~b,,o..,,,, 11:'A10 '.11'':: 000°1111*.1.!; .1..11- 1.1111110MII~ CT
i! o.9.~~000 o . ...... 1 . O l0% O l"i'5o111 1
oO l.1.. 0.0 100%OIII Ildl- T, 0-4 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 O l O . 1....11 00% 11-....- 00% .011...1%.0,-7 j~~~d-W1. FL ~ ~00.A 1.U% ,''1' .. 00% .1.111''' 0% >.* 0%~. ~ 111:'' .
05 .k UkNC .30A -l-baued~ ~.S o. oo%00 Q~o0 .. ..... ...._ .. %-. ..: .' W 000%90 IS0 00
000 .% 90000. 0400. 016070 A WLt .'. '.99.23~ .1 . .. 0 1 0 1 ..'' " .0 . 0 9'. 01 '..'
. 11. 000%... ' .. 04 I WA ' . b~1 O 0. 00 % .1 o1.. . .1..'.., 00 % . .7 1 11I5 -07 % ...0 .o02 K---. C.0L 00% 11 0.07 11.1 000. W 11.1117 O bl 0 % 0.00% 1 . ' 0 1
o~~wu ~~I~~~ P~~aox ~~ 1.16o.oo53 CoooOO.Ooo.0.,.A0.o S 101.11. 00 1140000 0.0 1:10111111 O~ 11:01100 .0% '-11.01' 000 .o o. 00 110.10 00 '.00*0. 000 0'.111..01OM :11111 'A1 ~-W' -. A. .. ….. - ........ 'Kk - D, I'M% .. O.DO.7.111.1-1-1 - .O .... ' ..o.000%~; ~ 101111*0*1 ..> 0% ooo%1u..01 0.00 .v . 2.23% bww 000%~ · *~w 0bii.0
100010 Jmey Or! .%0111 00 r . .. . . . - +* *.
:- '-'. ...... >:.>x0''..% :... '- '.'!- 002% -.1!;1.;;!.!00 Ikl 00IL.2 0 -1 0WA 000% % . . ... . 1 . 0 . ' O l122 L~ o~oc~~ o.114 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ar'iiif b'iiil ,, M.,.tl~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. K·'.....'.»>*I( 0:11111.1.1.1.x 0~o .00%*~C~~ .1.0.W 0.0 1101. OOl 1..11..:.1 D0.00 : 0) OD*
IX?~~~~~~~~ Ioo.mo *q .O
11! Lalyette nqob~' 5bi0.61y:~~~~~~~~:~~:~~~~~ OOOY 000* :5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000119 Lo.lI LAW D.X.
121 L1..ldw1.'1.1. 0.001 70111 1 O .1.1 000% 000% '.6.- 002% 0 0
112 L~~~~~~~~~~~cul~~~~~~~PA Zz~~~~~~~~~~ o~~~~~~ow ~~~~~~~ o~~~~~wu ":'~~~~~~. o
o~~oo~e 0.oar ~~~ 0.04* ~~i~ o~~anu ~ owa ~~5~~ o~wu ~~r: ooox ~ojoo
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 85
Appendix 7Geographic Concetratibons -1999
023~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$i o~.Lg 00% i..t:: 0o0 :i.:::00: 000% : : 0: :i : .:oo :::i:.. o ~~:::i~ 00% :i:.:o 00% ::::*5i!i 007%~i~ii!..' 00% 0000~~i:~ o.
020Loo~~~~~~~~~~~oo.:.b : ':i: 000 ::::;:: o% ::::.0:::%:000% .:::::: : 000%: ::::::: 000% ::::::::: 000k:::::::: 000% : :::: :::.000 : ::::::: 000% /:'::::: 00%127 0.;-0,0KY Ii ::::::o 000% i:'556..::' 000% ~::!:~ii 000% !.ii~!! 000% 000iikiii~ oo. ~~iii( 000% iliiii~~~0o i..'. 00 ~'011.'i 003% ....iiii' i o00% 000%~ii:~i
1 Laulgll KIOOHO~o.Oat .. k:..?.5.A.O 000% 000% .000k0. .....I.. 00.00.
000 LA0010000.00000000010I::0: : : :::::i: 00% :::4:5:!: o0o7% :* :::!: ~00% ::-::.:: 000, .':.:::*:' ~00% .. '*00 00i::.:!~~! .4..:.**:i 0 00% i~~~~~i*' 0 ., 0000::~!:: o000,:0::::::o,150 L. : : i 00% 4.:i 0% 00% ..: 040. :5:5::$.:10:000% :.o. :: 000M. :i . : M 0o, 5 05::% 000%
133 OoobbooloT7C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~i![::.:~:: 000% ::::: 00::: � 000 ::::::::: 000 e. :::::::::.o% :::::::: 000%, :::.'::: 00% . :::::::: 00%',.' ::::::::: 000% ::::::::::::: 0.o% :::::::::.00%000%I30Mo/.ooo'00 000%...551. 00/. ........ 000/......... OiO%........ 0 0 0/ 000%. .OW 00 0000% '::..:
007 l M000000000 et0 une~ml 000%:::::.: Oo ' :.~..':. gS 000%:. 000%.1:: 000 % :1':.'. 0% . .0.:00 ~ 00 .'.'..00/ .0':170 O~~~~od~~ooO.A/./..o401 0000 .45.. 004% . 0000 .~~~~~~~~~~~~ 000% . 0 0.% ::.':::: 0,00% :::..1;1 00'/' .0:.* 000% .:;::00:/.000~~~~0 *.*~~~~~~455~~~~*.* 020% ~~~~~~~~ 000% 000% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O'.*./ 00% : : : :: 00/ 00% : :::::::03% ..~.. 00.0 :::':. ::0,00/*,4I~oo. ,C ......000% 000%i0::% . 000% ... !!i0 . 0 : 0 0 /
10200~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.o..00.5115.0. 000%'~il. 000.".. 000%~ii....'.;i'!000%.".... 00%:5*00% ..!00!%!..44.0:,. 1!53%~4k~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....,. i:...',:!:..;.' 5~01 ~ ~. .!5i!4!54. 541o~55 0. *.o.:..51145:'...:'... . r.A
007 OooFL 5o:o:oo : : : :i 000% . .K'.:... 000%000/. 000% .:: 000% 0::: 000% 00% .. 000%. 000/140~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:::i ,oo.000% ::.::S:::: 000% :::!:::: ,00% !:::¢~:! 000% :!:.,::::!: 00o% :i!'':::: 000...:"::::: o% 000~::i~! ,oi''~!ii~! 000 o% 0:00:/~.:!.000%,4 ALO.oA0
030 O~~~~~~~~~y ~ ~ ~ ~ i:.'!.:o!:'. 00 .% f~~~!: 00% . ~::i. 00000% :i...:i:: ii ,o~ ~: ?i 00% .::!i:.: 0 00% . 000::% ~: . o :00:0: . : % .:.... 0 00% 00002 Noo/...I'0 000% 5~~~~~~~. 000/il000/ . 00.%.~..~. ::.2:. !L : .. ::0:0! :i 0.00'..'":%.."~! *.o.q'.:::::::.°..*.~i~:. . .....!!:::: 000.000..-'::::: .o.. :::ii:..... 000/ .:::::,00%
~, ~ . ,, ~ s c[:..:::::::!: 0 00 ., 10:[:::: i 0 ~:: !: ~! 00., 4 ~'':: : ~ 000% : ! !::.: !::.: 20 % : ~~i::: 000. , : : : :::::: 0 00 .: i i~-. i~' i 00, ~ '!i i 000 . :.:::000 %100 N,,F0.OO4]?:!:O~::.:: 000% ' :::: 00% ::::::0:0 .o .,.~ ::0:::: % :..:. ~ ::000% i:F~~ o. 00.:0: 000 o ., .::5:: !:!: 010% ::::o..'::000%. .:: .o%007 Olo~~~~~~~ooo/.io, : :!0:.A : : i 000/.::~~~ 101011 00::0/..::: ,00. 000/:'.~: ~. :::! 000/~:::::::: 000,::..:::000% ::~:: 000., ::::: 000., i::'.. 00,%
050~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::: .oo., 000%: [::?: .oo00% 00::::i!: 0%.% ::::::0% .'::::::::: 05% '::::::: 000.~ 00: ::? 0% .~:~:: 000% :~::::i 000% :: 0:::0:10%.17 -%~deLA
003 00000 F].~~~~~~~[':!i~:!i 000% '::.':::: 000% :::::.000%. 000% ::::::: .Oe 000~::.% :::::::::000% :::::::.000'% :::::::: ,00%: :::::::: 000%..:::i:::000'%
lOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I!:oii~....,4l.odT2 000..':!55o5."030%..i .. 000.~ jii000/ o :0.00..000....0! 0i0....',li¥.:i . o/%...000%:Lo.-:.i~~i~!~.,m.~!!i~~~ii ,,,4, ,5o,. .... ~ ..5 ....,,,c.54l51..~...\~ . . ~0.
100 000.40 F]. ~ ~ ii!::~!::!i 00% !i,~°,% ~:!::5 .:.: !::0% .00% 50*'.: .: 1-% 0'0% ..... 000%~..~! ....44. 4:i~! 00% !:i:!.~:!: .~..... 0% .5144 4%0000.SOOOKY 000% 000% . ' 0000 . 000% ....... 000% ... 000/. 000~~~~~~~~~~~0 ".55..' 002% ...~~~:i:! 0..0: . 000%n.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ""iW!:i:: : , , '070 P~~~oO~~o~oooo.000o.O ~ ~ :!:W:Oi:$: 000% ::.:::..: ,00% ::!.:000~i.% :. :::0.00 :::::::; 000% ~: ::::: : 000% ::::::.00% ::::5k.':.: 000% :::..::: o00. 0:::::0/: o.*072"~"'"~"~ 0%o.,o O. 000/. .54. 030%. 00%. 00%.... OW. ......... 01.......... .........
073 Od0ss0.0dlt T0[. : : : : : : ! 00%. '?!~:!..4.~..00.'. 000% 0000 : . 00% 000% . 0..% .i!:::::..o...~.. 000%:~-iii.... :~. 0:.0:0/~!.~~?:~!!... 000% ~!:ii....~ ?!ii(!?..,J~' :~~ ,.~.15, I- -P~l.-~. 000%' *55 .0%.'A 00 . 00 .*..00 . .00 . 0/. 15 00 .. 0~....~ 001 Y. . . 0 . 0 . . . 000% .....-. 'A.00 ...... 00% . 00 . . 000% .....101 P.00.o. 00 . 000%i~ 00/ 000~ o14 04... .. .... 000/. 000% .. '.'0% ...P.. 000%. 000%
002 0'oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::.: : : : o 00% 000%: ::::: 00e00 o..... 0:::::::::::~:1o0%,%:::X:: .0%::::::: 000% :::: :::.. ::::.':.. 0.% ::.:::o 2.~..:::,o% ..::::.::: 00%
002 Po/./.oCO~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~::~i:; 000% ~::~~;i: "0% :i:.':i: "000/ 000::::~i: 0 0 : : ::::: 00% : :::: :::"00% 0::::::::00% ':::::"::: 000% ::::::::: 000% :::::.:;: 000%*007 00000oO~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~I:::.C:ooo:.. :!!0
0000% 0:::~:: 00% 0::::::00% 000%::::~ ,00 0% :.:::::: ..%::::.:::,00/ ::::::::, 00% ::1:::::: 000% ::::.::C: 0.00% :::::i':: 00.%00 0.d0.P00i."_ 0% r55y 0% .... 00% "545.00 .. ...04. 00 00 55 70 .00 .... 00040*004000.0.0 0.ooool/.o CO 000% 5545 007% 0000 524* 303% :"'5 000% ~~~~~ 520% . ' 000% ***514514~~. 004% ..~.. 000/. 000%104 . 00 0 ::::000% ::. 003%: :: : 00 00% ::::: : 000% :::: 0000 : 000% 0:000 : 000 ' 000
$515. 5.141405, 1414142 51-A, ..
000 S00Liio.C~~~~~y.004oo07 ~ ~ ~ .,000%.(i.5:5i:?i 00% 000..%i??:: ,o455 5~Hii~ 00% i??!i ,, !.'..?Hi. 00% ,00% 2!?i~L"'.! 000/ 555!5?~:~ 042% ?i~ I WO:i 0.0%0/.i:::?~,8, P.: ,-,,,,uooo 0.OOOOOCA 0~~~~~~~~~~~~00% :.:.:555:.:::! 000% i:?~~? o 000/ ±i?!:i1::0 00. 55oo 0% 1414:145i~oo., 010:'/. . 0000'~ :¢.5:"4: 020/.* :::::::::5: 320% :ii'':?:: o00,200 S~~~o~~oo.Ooyooo.0'0,.o. : : : ?~?: 000% : : : : ?: 000. o.. 00% :F:¢: 00o., :~.:::: o05% :?::::.:i ,00% :?... 00 , 00'*% '.~: .~.:: ,~ :::~00',% .:::%202 0.oO.CooO.OO~~~~~~~oooooloCA0o. 00::0% ~??$ 000% 000/::?~:: o~. ::?:?:,00% :::::::::. 000% :::i::?:;' 000% 000/.?:i~:! ooo 0000?:???:~ '. 0:i 00:%i~ , .oo .. 0% ::::!':2040.ooo ..... 0040/. 0005 0040/ . 0040/....55*..004%....0000 . 000% .''5514"020"'.. '000......00
000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :::::::: : : : 000% :::::::: 000% ::: :::: 0,000 ::::::: 0 00% :.:::::00400 .:: ::: 0 000 : *::: 0 00% :::::::~ 0 00% ::::: ::::000/.::::~~ 0 000
212 OooOO~~~~~~~~~ooolI!OiO:!..00% ':!!'54..q. ~ 00/ :.i'.. 000. 00% ji?.' 0:0:.0u% .j!! .... . 0000.~ti!...~ 000%~:::...? !~..': i 00..0% ~!ii~:::: 000% :!?~ii~~i000%
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[!::.: : : : ;:;:5.M 0000 :55::5::? .005 ..~ . 000i::!;::: o,.%.. 0040/.:; : .:; : .: 000 % ;;;;:';; 000%, :~;;: ::: 000 % ::::::::,0 .51 01??i;:;;:"00 ' ;:::;?;;; 000% ;;:?..::::: 000%20000000000040~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~i:::::!i o00% :::::..~:~ o00 :::::! o' :::::::: 0' :::: o% ::::::::: : : 0oo%.. :::/. . 000: .:::::: 004. 00o.% 000::::::io% :::::::.::.o'. 000%::200 Tioo~~~oo
00
00.000% ~~~ 000% . 000% . 000% ~~~~ 000% ~~ 0040/. . 00400:5114.414.:.: 0.00% x~~~~~~~x: 000% . 000% -
200~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~ ,.o 7i!:il , , - !!l~~ooo., 0 000%ii 000/ ~.i.. : 000% . : : !!)).~. 00 00 ?i0%*~ "00 5 037/. '7.i~ 000 % ...'.~.'~: ,% i!!'.*!!io0.;".i:::: 000%
222~~~~~~~~~~~~~[::::!:: OOo~KS00% :::~:: 002::~:::.14' 000 000% .'::.'.::::::::: 000% ':t":: 0o0'% :::::::::.': 0.00% ::::0::: o.62'.::::::::: 000/,::::::::: 000%
227 Ty~~~~~~~~~~~~o!::::::: 000% ;:::55: 03S0/ 000/:::::~ 000,::.~ : % :::~: .00% .':.:.': 000..0 :::::::00*::::: 1 2' 000% ~:: 000. . 00%::::::::O,--di~..C.... ../ ... % ..... 0..
232 0%0000000000~~ ~ ~~.'-.iii? 00'% .:i~ii*ii': 000 ..!' ...!i'. °00% *~(55.-!:i oo2% 000i?~ o% 00/ 040 5:i00 ....000%-! '.:41°7', 4..::0424...224000000.02~~~~~~~~~~~!:~i o00/. ::::::5::': 00% 0040/: ::: 0 040 ::;:::: 0$:: 00 % :::.:::: 00. 0:::::::0% 00:::0:$o% 0040::0:: 0000% ::..:!: 000::::
237 Y00i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00.0 00 :??::4?:: 003/. 0000: 0040' : '::!000% : ii??: o.0::0::%.00000, 000:?:::o%O3O~~C S000e]¢4 0...::5.:! : 000 . 00 . 00.00%. . 0:0:?.".::::: 000 "::':::?:: 00oo% i:::*~i: 00/ 000::0?::
..,., SoM.C 0/ 000.~: ::::::: .~..:. 000/.: : : : 00400 0040 :..: :: 000/. !:::::?.000/.:?::0:0: : :040: o 00.%: oo', : : ::: o .5* -'. 1 :::::::::::.. 15 5.5 :.::.: 5.5.:200 Yob.C'oCAo00. .:::.: 00% : : :: oo% :.00% :: :::: o00% o~::::::: 00..% .. 00% 0000 51 00. 0%C2o
00 s,.1 o
00::0::*::.::0
~o,~~~~~~~~~...... s,:,,.......,-'A.,, -Ai~!7~io0%.~.ii!.: o, :::::~ o. :~':.:~~ ~:~~ .: i:..!', %::::::!': .~$:.i~ 4% ~~:~~ ~o. !i'i::::o.211~~~~~~~~~~~~~::~:: ,o. !:,:: o%:i:::Spo. !- X~!: oo~ii::: ~ :.::.:?oo,~i!;i: o%~i~.:?~. 0%:::;:~iiioo,~:::: o.
n, T- ,,,.?.L4.~:~..~ ............~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .............
:u I s . - O ...... .217 Ttco '
221 oeoO
:z3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~p ..r,,i~
W:e .... .o,,...Y- -A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~:~i~iio0 !$~~i:: .2,i~~:..!?~ o%:~!?i??~ oi?!i!i~.0%~~i!~~:.o !i~~ii? ,. ii::¢:: o~:ii?!?~iioo ?::::::o0:~ ,c?:::::: .0*::::::: 0' ':::::::0D :::~::'00*:::a"': 0% A:~~2~
!::!::!?O0*:::::::::,0" ::::..:::O0*?:~'""?:i'00Y-0 1A~~~~edN~C
86The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Append 7Geog.phic Concentiation -1999
Too.0~~~~~~~: UAO T00~ o ol ~ o�o.,~ :T-t.'?ii : : 0 oooa.!:o. To ~:~: : if: oo.0O~ '0.
000% 000% ~ ~~~~". ' i 00% ~ 000.:!00% 00% 000 !!.~'.!"'.-'i'.'. 0 !i!.!.!.!.!.!.'0:"000.0~ ~~~ ~: 00. . o 0:::::::. 000%. . o000% ::::.L..':::: o('... 00 0% O000% .'.'.'4'.'.': 00 oo'" 000% ii:: "' O 000 ''7"00% :!::::~:!00% :~:io p 0% o00000.0 000% .~~: 00% 00::i::!::8 '.0': o00% i:~'::.'~:':: 00% 00 ' 00 "*' 0oo70
*~C 003% .....'.~. 000% .eo00% :::000 : : : 0::0%: o'O'. :000% :::::::.::::::: 0.0% oo 33
:0 000% :::.'.:0::0: 000% : -.:*::0.00 o:.%
::0 % 0%' .... %~ 00.::::::::.. : : ' 000 :::::::::: "'0'000% 0000""'00 %"""'00 %'..'..'o'..0 00%.i'.'.'i.: ooo. 000 00 % oo~A'.~:~~~~i o oo.
000.0 00o% :::::: 000o oo.'.'.'.. 00:% *'.'0o% 000% :::::::::: 0ooo.000. 000% . ..... 0.000% 00% '~~" 00% """"": 00 o.' 0:00. :.:ii:? 000% :''04.. 00% ooo% .j. :020?:~:o.0000% "*50'.'. 040 """::"< 000% :!:'.".::.:!:.: 00. . 00 o.,...': 000 o.!:?::i:.'.:?:0:o oo.,(00 ..... '' 00
0 ...... .000% .:?:i:?:?:?:i:? 00% : .0 % : 00 . 0 . 00000% "'205*'' 2:0 0o% :'::' : 0000 ? o00 00% : " 00o.% ""' : : ?:::"" 20% 00 . 00o.
000% ""202*4.'. 300% ..'4%01<' 000% 000/~..'........ 4-0..'". 00 "4*'' 33 '''''''" 00% o.4'' 05'0120*~~~~~~~~ o05.0%. 0:::0%:: o o o'000 00 1% " . 000000:::::: .0o.0 43% 51.oo./000% . 000%"""~~: 000. :?:?:??:?:: 00ooo ''<.<00.~:o.oo.. :000:::% 000% 00 00
00 o.oo%.:.:' :. : : i:. 00% 000 . 00% . %:002%0 000 :0I0I00 . 000.0'~ ~~~ 000% ::!:?: : "":!:! : : %.'o%."':"oo00%"'.".:::::%i000% o000
:: o oo% : : : : : : : .': :.. -:o0%::::::':':0 0.o'00°% "..:!:':' ?:oo' 0 .,, 00::0 0% 0 0.000% """""."' 00: % '." , 000 : : : 00:% ":"""" 000: '00°% .'": 0: %?:.:..::'':'. 0:0oo0o.,00
000%""'0102""050%""' 00 0 000%o000%o''000 .:. :.:. 00'. :0 0 00%:::::
:00 o.."'.'.'.'.' 00 ' : :.. 0 0 0 ""' 0% ...... :. 000 ...... 0:'0: . . 0 ........
00 ..... 000% :':':':::!: 0:% o . 0 : 0 ".o 000.0 000.000010.""''.'.''. 00% . '. : 00000 :::::::::::: 0000 ::..'. o00o..... 000::::::::::% 001 000%
i!!! WA~
i: "'A~ i~i~i:?:i:? : 00"' 000% : 00o",""-":::%::':.:'.°o00~~~~k2' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 0. 00 """00 """"00 :.:::8:? : .:: oo.... 00%..:..00 000% ::::000%
Miami~~ ~~~~~~~: oo. j:~:~i:::o~,: o~::.:'::!',
0% o 04::: :: 0o0...0:0 : "0 ::: 0000% ::x:: 000 :*:xX: 000% x:~::::: 0% """"00 ''":::: 0oo0% .:.:4*:.2 000,0 :x:4.~:: 0000.222202 40% '.''.''.''. 00% .".:.. 00o . . 0%o0% :.::!5:?'.': 07o~ 00i:......' 00 ..".. 000% 0:[.'.'::' 000%,
000.0 """"""' 00% "" 000 0000 *.':::::. ooo. " 00 *X :. 00% 000/. .:::::i000%000% '~~~~~~~?!.'...'' ~? ~i:!i:~.' :~ ' 000ii . i.00. 00% 00 000%:. 0'0.00:
*422~~~~~~ ~~~ 070 0000 0000 ?':?::: 000% oo.5..20 .':.'..'::::"~ 00% ""0.'00 "."... 00% 0. 2/
0 0..0000.. /. ::::: :::::::::.00%: 000% :::::: : :: 00%. 00000'0. .000%~~~~ oo. 000:::% ?:: 000%, : 000'0 .'." 000%?!::?~ '.'...'0% . 0 . 0000
000/. : 0000 0,00% 0% - .. --0: : 00% : : 000% .'.: 000%000% ..000%~~~~ ".....00% ''.'....0000 . 000 .:.:::::::: o0oo% :X331/00 o oo..''.~ ' 0 ::::~::::: 000%~2222222 240% . 000'0 ..''' : 000~ ":::":"": o0o%,. 000 i ooo: 0 :.:.:.:.:.:. ore,.. 03000% ~.'.'.''.'.'.' 00 . .0oo . , 0% X 0 :.:.:.:.:::.:: 000%.'.'.'..': 000%~ ""*:..":::: 04700 0 .. 0000 ....'.'.':.o 00% .'''''''' 0 0/ X'''. 00 :':':':: : 00,% : .0. ""..... .0o0m . '.:::::::::::: 00%000%~~~~~~~~ ''''''''00 '... 00% 000%:".:! : '..'.":'.: oo' ....... 000 : o oo0 0: :?:.::o.000
.7000%.000' ''' 000% 000%~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 000% ::::0:: 00% 0.0 000/.
.~~~~~~..-x i* O-%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .oo. .. : :i,':::: %000% . 000% ''' 000%~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 000% :?:..''.'.:: 000......<~ 0% 00. . 0% 00000%: M .'...'....00.....00.0..00% ..2:: 00% 00 """"'00 "' 2/
00/ 000% 0000 000%2".'.""'. 00 " .. 000'.00.
-.-A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - .A% :*K: ::::::: oO -o oo.n::::~ o.00% """""""' 000' ""X'X< 000% <'XXX' 000 """*"" 000% "'k"" 000% 000.. 0% '000. .000%'.'"' 000%'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' 00010~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~!'.".'.'!!i??'.' 000%.'.:.''.':'' 00%..' 00. 000. .00
.000/ ..00'/."."'.'."00.'.'.'.'.' 0000 000. 000
...4501..oboo... 000% 000 000 :... : : ""':: " .0.
Fiji~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~ii~::i.'::::oo00% 000'/. .X3.: 000'/. :3.XX~~X 000% """""""" 000% .'.".''.'." 000% .'.".o'.o'.'.'.:000% . .0000 . 000000% 000% ::~:~:~ 000% .'::.' 020% 'X:XX 000% 'X'X'3."' 200'0 ""'222222"" 002% <'o'oe''X::::::::::::::::0.00%00% ::X::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.oo:20% ::000.0%::::::::::::'''''.00.."""" 00 """""0""": 00o0%/00%~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~ : ::?::::..... 00 .'.'.''.::'? 000 000% ''00 '"' 00 . 0% '00.00% >::3.::.3. 000% *X< 000% '. 000.0 "".l'2 " '.w'.'''' 00 . 0% """" 0% """" o'
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 87
App 7endi G-ogir'cCnetei -19PP
-A U.:: S
x" .... 14
..........X 11 'A C.
"X Ap". AO-A ..2
-A O-A ...n ..-A:!X 'A O.W%
I -A
WA ...'A-,-% ;KWX ..74% --n
�`K I-In... 'AX. --n .m -A -.00-A
O.Oft5 -A,0� ",..A q .% X O."
-AI- -A
WO i,
.K-A ...O%
I.,VA -.-'A k::I:' 1.71
.. . ........ .... ..X --.T X.
W%O .-A ..on0 AIM- ......... Apm.:- 0.00% A.............
0.00% SAN, I.A.-A
..On ...% O..O%-A
......... ... ...........'A 0. -A O..
'A --A 0.%.- A 1 2 1.�I v% i.d-AX.
X. ........... .
0 -A 0.%.'A
-A ........... .,00I.-A O.--X.N.:
O---% -AI,' IN 0 -A .- A .,.O% O+W%
O.On 'A
....% :;;X"..."X .'A.On
... ---- ILIM AM,X,; --% -A WA X: .M
0-%X IkOO%
5..2% ..00.PONT,..
-- A .�W%0. X,,-,X,-:: 'A
0. -A ..-A ..OIIA 0.% 'A-A 0.% O.-%
-�.-A 11.00-A :i*: O..-A 15%O'.
O'. 0.00�-- A -A0 W-A .... A 0 .'A ..00% M
On -A............. ..........WON, -x..On
................ ........ AM
Kil.IXI
..... .................. A19M.0:4-1.
:%
O., X, ..OWA --A -A MK. %,'!:. -,O.-A%X M O.
.-A O-A
-NO-N:X. --% :'K.M A ........
11.21%
X X 'A. "'% ..W% XM-0:
RPM.
i
.v ..... ~ - s .- -.- oo. ,., ; ~ :; A"/ .: " : 1,/ e : 0."/::.
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 88
Appendix 8Geographic Conenttions. -1998
2 . ITX o 0 00 o0.0 00 .20000 '74%~m 0T0% i 0% 00 0% 00 00% ~ 07 0.00%
3 OH o.4, .
6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OW DdtOulqu N)(ow .1* O. O.00'~
0 Ab00oq0 0J210m- 0.00% 0~1.49%~o FA o. .ool. 30 0%~ .5 .0% ~ 00 007 Altoo o 400 0.% 0 0 00 00 00 0.00%
X;~:0 400000 N. 0,.'A .5 :'..00 0% 0W/ 0% 00% .~ 0% 00 .0IA~utw.-Bdlrb~m-1 ~~Io ~5i % o n Ok:...'..' 000 .P 00% 000 ow 0.00 ~ ~ 0.00l .~ 130 0.00% ~ 0.00
I1t m1Ae ~ MIw o ~eolA w ;: oo· .. "
07 AP.idooAL 000%9.00% ~:~ji 000 1 CU 0/ . 000 .B 1k 005%13 Atlefi NC 1o.A B, ~-A ...'A V%
17 AulOtLkm SC o. ooC-Ai
21 Bs~l-Ymnouh MbA .00*&'A -2 :a o] LA .'A .jin o.o.,o B.~w
2 euo- Po Am TX o..o.%.-%~N
~7 Bl -C vRpd-urLolsMq .000 .29 o .00 .0% ... .... 0. ......... 0 .. . .0 . oo %B3. Io-ee00% . .' 00' 0 .%
3Bde-onot CO M oo.'%.A-~4 Br~~~~~to~, 'nr :: o ool,!,~~~~~~~I'A
37 B-Coe TX' o . ooTX38 B. B.-%~~~0.01 Bu o-Niqtr Fdhr ,· oD 0.0 . :. O%
30 ..- CmtC-fidln --- B.%4 oC.lOllO41-1oh C.qorlof 0.00S.!: .0 00 0% 00 .*C .0% ~ 00% 00 .0 0.00%-x~~~~~~~-
42 SC..c-'O - lS C oo2. .0 0404000040.0 Chb'tottervi~lyAL ::.X.~ .00% 0.33% 0.00% 0% 0.00% .00% 0.00% .00% 00%090000000049000~IT .: :0 ow o(%% ·000 00% < 0.00% :: .0090 .~5:X: 009%
42 C-b.. .I.L ..MO-......O.B%.
39 C OHKli 00% -..Y -09 0 ..Y-0% -0 . 0 Kil: 1.731A30 3.oooloOro.00oloooOo Boorlo TXii" ib i 000%i; ~" w 000%1 *.o.... 000 ool 000 ii 000% c' 0.004 00% .IP Bltw~~u~~cLA OW·~9410 $$6 009. 0 000%OW· 0.00/. >X22. 0.00% D.W 000
39 OoIstvi-Io pkinl 'n0o.4%o oFoi 305 00% 000% 000% 000% 0Q 0 00 .00% 0.00% 00 * %
41!;:o' 05 0. 004 00% 00. ~0;%'~'~$ ~.$~:!!i:;:0.00%:::! ::::::::::::.:::.: .0 .$% 0%~500 ::: 0;.'.'0;!;41 CodtO CSuboi0 $C 0. :n 00 ::~: 0.0 9;4I2.03% .0% oo00%
5 C0otbulOA-A o.Ook0 CO 0 w'6. 0 . 00.. 6~.3 . 0% 00 ~5~2333 : .5 22t .0 :$ 0/
44 C0. otuO..bu, OH 00% ...j.~..* 000% .* . 000% ........ 000 000 '~~'::~:: 0.00% ~ 0.00% ~ 0.00% ::::~ 00090 22 -22X 0004B..A ,..c:*.~.. . B. .. 6 o.
03 C.-.O.%0% 0 0.% ...'e 3% 00 000%40 Dlon&Be.Oopich j 75-Y 0M. o2962~04 :2$$: .0 99$$$ .0 'o00o0/. 00 $:k::00% :::$:'00 . 0%
58 .OH '5-S 30 0 0 0 00H .. 7%00X.50C59 D ,GAA 00 2:2::: 00.2:$$: .0 ::::$$ .0% 00%AL'. 000 00 ::k0$ .0% ::'2 00 0/
56 D. Mo--, .1% L 04 i 3% 0% ~. . $ 7 0O0%
D4C% 00% .0 0004
-.a ..... .. u...- . 'R.430.....54 Dov o.e DE I o 1 . . o00% 00
07 4-o sW.H l 0. 000oo%., . ..Z. ... 0a'.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X7~~~~11~~~~~~~~~~~~ RqK~T AZ.UT 0.00% .% B W. Bs 0.47 000 00
?3 F-o~nce SC 000n
.. 9?.RS75009AL .......~~~~. . ~ . 000% . 000% . 0000 000%.:::$2'~~~/.$ .... /..0004~~761 P.. .FMy.-C C.4 PL . . .. . .
97 P.' i--Po S L-~e 000%.S~bp~on .'222$222 000.p22:p22: 0.03% -:2::~222 000% o..... 0.0007 0004t 0hA0%nt. 000 . .
0 F. TX 004400B0C 00090 - .. 1o.
I-IN B% Ps. 0A ooo%70 .0l o NC % : 0. 000% 0 .00 :::::::- .00~. c,(Q~Y II da,,.,mt~ · aa ~···
I~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .o. 00%.. 05 ...... 0.0% 90 ::2 00 00 . ' o.000
73 00000001K ~~~ 20 0.00% ::$:.:. 0.00%~....0.00% : . ...... ........ 0074 044 CoO0,1.oooo. CO~*:~ri~ ·W oo89 G2md 000% s-}'uskeWn-H 0M/ .' 0.0090 :::$$$$$ 0.00 0% .. 000% 22:22222 0.00% 2:$*&p2 0.0090 ::::$$: 00090 000%
70 CMmP... NC o%.0 2 S.:.04*: . . ' $:.0 .1% : 0 ,
7000093 .4-K 2'0 G. e6:...*00/. .:::bur00%-A:$:: 0.0 . . 0/.C: o oo%::$:: 00% :$$::00%::::2 0% 00
94 :.H.Ix -00013 S. ......h..~q0 r30oo0 0090 .000%...·" 0 %'.2$ 0009 o. 000%96~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 I H.Lebmon -.-Ad pA 0. o~%
H9 - -( CT B . .A B o 4o %4 ?? 0 79 .. 09. 000 0....0%. ..... 00 o 0I.,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00t ::::::::::::::: 0-' 0.000opp~~~l ~ ~ ~ 000~~~0: B.'A --- -'
tot Hu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~14-Adl .7-¥-O O..%%102 l~kunlwme . .oo%
10 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~w Iolwo IA I 56. -Abiln P 3 . W · o . oo%2'B9
1o6 Jacko* 00 0% 22.. 0% .. 00 22-2:00/ :::::: .0 -2222:ioo 2:::::: o.oo:2::::2. 0% "'* '0%U Oooo4 704.000.1.04 00% 0.00% c:9:9 -'2'-" 000% ..,,.. "~22: .." 23:
Kd--B I-A n. g O.- B .- o902 ...000000o.%500000.Sol.00.900g4.P0.oIWC -2'--"-2 b~*::::::::tt~""'~5s54:::::::::.......... . ..........o:9%$::$::::::~15lt~::::::]~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~07 r~o~w )m o o.oo% ~ DO90001 30C 00%tlb :2'9::$ 000 ::::2' 000 000/. ~:::::l:: 0.00% ::::::> P U W i '-. .... . 00% 00046
:3 , I ,.. , . .... ~-..~..o ,,,,.. ............ 000.,,aJ DmrrDB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~9*~:: :.W:::"x ~ '.-.--... 000 /.:2P22 000 >2~t2 057 22::0.2 004 0004i::~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .~.. ,.. :. 0009 '....$:::. 00% 00 0/ 0%::: :2:::': ::.:: 000!~"~j0;!
Ill I-IIIn T'A 0.0'
O.-A 0-1 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.0116 ~ e 'IN o.oo* w..
17 I ~P0 017% : 0.0 ::::2: 0.00 % 000% 0.00 0.00t '
99S 0041,.ooMS IN"' 0% 7:62 .5 22" .0 0% ~ 0' 2-*:: .0.$$$:200%~4k:09% 00 0.00%4
:PA 0 p~. 04 000/.
32~ ELralatuter PA o.c oo%T.'.T~~~~~~~~r.*rr'.~~~~~~~~~~.*.'. 5~~~~~~~~C~~~.222:. -:-.'-..'. '::~~*"'*'*:~ I~~: "~
71 RrcS :~::~:~~:.FOso.2 '2OO,.o2:$':::2:.2o.W :2:2.2222: . 0 ~~~ O.W):~:~~: ..O W::·:~~:~ ODX . O
109000970s 0 . ~ 000 ::::: 000 . ','.... 004 ~ ' 0% :::'0,0 :::2: 00% ... .. 00
77 ~n ~~crPaf~l ~ ~ -........ 0$:::6.O9::22:i30452:::2.:::2$22.9.*0b.9.66
002Koloooo.OO~ 0001 20*..' .0% ~.......... ,.... , ::::$:5.0 ::::::: - ~ 00II P~~~t~db-Mln~~~aTX ow $:::54::2 0.00/. 000%si. 2222. 00/. '-'.0'..' 0.000 *'""2.w 0.00 ~ 00%
13 Oldld~~~U O.O~n ~~ 0.13Y b:DOD o 0 O.W *""":·OO 00/ :2.:::: 100% -22:2.22:.:
(UL Onad~~~~~~~c ~~lW~........o.. 0.00% ~:::$ :9:D:O$2 D.9: O *92' 0 .00% :::::$:: 0.0% O.WY D.Wn ~~~~ 00Dn O~ .'..''..' 000%~i ,0' 000%
000 0.0000090004 ..... 7i'~ ~D.P* S;~~~i 000 i~~:~ wn OW· ~.~ D.01 .OY·· I ODf9) Clla~~lr~eutulbur~AadaoaS C ~ 1;1; aooX l~~lr~ 0.0016 O~wn .04 ::$::'ooo% > 3:'ol) ,. io
·55~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'::::2 0.0' 6.99::9:9: 000% 02..'. 000% .W .O~~f'pp+ :b
89The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 8
Geogrphc Conct=atlns - 998
# MOA NAMg T-,*!.
000 OooOOOO .00% ~ 0.00% ~ 000% . 000% 0.00% ~ 000% .000 ....... 00 A . 00%'A 00%
I2 m nt ~ .OO
128M Li.OH o.1' =O = Oo%n9 u.4fd- OR , 00... .. - ........ 000
133~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 'T'X O0, OO222 1.o AY .....,........ .00 % .9% 02. 0% 0.00 0%..Zt.20%...U.. 00. 0% o..t 12 tt OH o.oo% $$.00 . 007. 0% 0.% 00% ..... 0% .... 00% .. 00 0%
t~.11~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O~fd.de 0o1 o000 ' ~ ~ :: o-. . .. 00 000I. 000 ~.......... 0.0%~...... 00% . . . .0~f............ 0001 Mredoo SCA O 0 . 0
143 I., fidemo me-ulre WA oo142 ..Ok-o' T. 0 2 0 0.000000% .4..e 0..0040 Moroe LA . 00%
10100.Ol.. !AOC.000%...~.... 00. 20.......... 00. 00 00k 0%. . o~. . 0....... 00
022OO.ooo-/,i1 2o240000 . .. 7% 00%'W*20 '":00 00 . 0% *4' My00% Bec 0C000% '~ .47
Y.2 NYle O O
..* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~.:. . **: '*:*, '/, '' ' W.. VA-...'O*5-..::4I'. .120 N ldoI-Xoqoo CTo.oo0.~10 . 00 . 00 . 00 . 00 0% 00 . 0%107 0 .A 00% O 02% .... 000% 0 " 0% OdeI 00.[4.. 0 1. 00A100 NW Y.3110Y o '. 000% oo020%%*::~: 000% 000'k .44... 020% 000% 000%. .000% . 00% .0O0O
102* 0.00.oAA 0.0% ..lt~t.. 020% .'~... 000% ~ 202% ~k~*k 000% ~lt. 409% 000k ..%S0. 0.0% . o** 1472%.O00O
OO2Ooo~~~~~oFL ..'~~~~~..'.000%.~~~O .. .. 40%. 000% 00%X ~ 0 0
141 o..*id.oA 0 M 0 0% 0 . 00%10 Ob- -. ,Y CA0 .. " S% 6�9%
1~40dp.~* ..X. . 000% I. 000% 000%0070 .00% ..O:::::n00% I040:; . ' A
172 p.robPo~ 10 o0 o o .0% 10 ..'. 0%17 Pk-Pckln .1 .. . O M . ... O 000% H0% . 000%~ ~~'2 FL O~~%1; 02~ :::... 0002 A* 00% . 00 0002. 0O
170 OO~~ol~ogA PA 21% 14U*~~~ 070% 000% . 000% ~~:::~~:: 100% ::.~~ 000% ~~ 0 00% ~~:t:::~ 121% ~~ oo% .0O0k
071 . .0% 0.0% .00% %%177 .0 d0 .. ' O .O 0.00 0
P P0 % 0 .... 00
002 0%ooo-Ooem UT 00%0o:~~::~:: 0 00% 000%. 000%0o% 000% ~$04j%.. .20k. ."O00% .N%13 lad blo Co 00% B 0:00% .im ... 000j. 0004 ~ ~ $ o0% . .Ooo%18 P-cid.-mwtc- p MA I.00*A
1811 Richmo~~~~~~d4PeterlburII VA ~ ~ ~ O 0 O3%.00%UT O..~~~~~~~~~.. 002 :~::007 ~ 00 0% :7. .:~00% O.000% .~.."A00 ,8 . 47. C. .00%4 O.0% o0% O.. ..17 Ok.ooo~oo.4ok.7o=oo WA 00%N.*...'." 000% ~ 000% ".' 000% ....... 000% C>~ 000%. .000% 000%.O.. .00..%.O O-. O0%100 'IV0.0k.-t0 .. A .00 7On : O.24 . ~ '00 2% :A: .% % .-00% O::14: 0,79 .00 V::::0.0109 -ik -o 000400 VA ~40 .. : O0% 1440 29.0.. ~0. 2 j*4 . 07 7*44..7 09% <- 00%:A:~0
00RIA.002 f~ L5:-A 4 . m.0% '00%~ ~ ~0004 002% 0 ......... 000% 100......... .. 00....::.~.<.. . .:::..~. 107....~: .019. Rocky M-n NO..% .0
19 Szmnt CA O . 0
024 000le OO0 3 0.00 ~00 ~..'00 0 :~00% 01. .9 ...>.00 %40~02107 000 Aonio UT 0% * 2% 0 402% .. 9*00 O..0
III . Alloli, TI .... A.~.... ..41 ::.:~:: 10% M00 O 00 **. 2.00 ' 0.30 1 >. *4141k I..%'**.'.'.'30 .00%'~ U .01 N7 0 'O .'. 2 '.*' .'.'2.*9% '" 70% ". 00% '" 11% '' 2' * ' 018sm EM CA "CA''" :O": *"'****" ~:*" .
099 S07 3 00 .......... 000
204 000000 CA .00%~o vdle 1004 o~X 04 70~:44~.32 ~ 0 . 00 44 .320 . 07 oo%.................
237 $crlnlono./Ofikes-Btr*o uleton PA o 000% :::*:.oo 000% ~. 0004 . 000% 0.00% 000k 0 .000
209 A o. 04 0ok
212 0.40ia2.1eld 00% 0o:o%0% . 00 . .. 0217 7oloo LA 0070% 00%... 00 0%::::M00% ::: %0%O..444..10% . 00 .
M SO.S0.1d M O~~000 3.41141... 20 0% 004. 2 2 " 00% .'A 0 000 4*.927 44 20% 000% O .'0214 ..1.. ......6.. ..O .o. o .21 Sy...0e 0Y0 .':0 07 . O O., 'A
22opld .2. r,:::::S!:: 00.oo% .::::::.:0:0:..o*4~::::..: 70...% :*::::::.:::ioo :::~::: 0.oo% :::::: oo. ~:::3.::::: ok. oo%~ ::::';:: 0'..~::::::o o o ::::::0::: o .000%
12 O 0 07 004 X.4 . 'A0..A00 . 0M O 4'.. 4$4 .... 44 007 00
220 7-.04o.Iloo-..-.,Ao- : . 00:.000:: . ::..... 0% o.0%.0%...o%
222 T...'::.0.0.oo% O:.,::.:::: 0 ,% :... 000% ..3 0.:: ::::: 0.oo ::::: 0004 .::::. o. ::: o.00 00.% : ::.. :::.:. 0oo%
231 TXuh~o OC-JDV-% O
2......... O . * ** .... O. -............ *. .*..**. 0 .. ...... .. . 00..70
220 '00I00opooo.Oho..A00.000 . 000k~~ ~:*4::: 040 :::::::: o.04 .::: 000% :::: o.00% :::..::::::::.07 ::::: 0...0% :::::::~ 0.004 :::::"::oo* :~::/'::,':oo%:::',,: :: .oot~'~::',' .o 0''':,:ooo0::':.''%.o.,227 V...10 CA N- 00.0 R:43:00%:::.m003 33:. 0% ::3: 00 0%"*.' 0 '.. " A00020 CA 000% 0~ . ...,.... 000k ,:%:~ 0:0:0%~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~::: O
241 702100........ .~t . 0*k 0*1.4___ __ ___d _ __ __t__ __ ;:' ..:.oo(/,;: .':!oo00%,;;.." ;;x0o%:: .'....;: 00o*/,:"3 0.DO00%*; ";,.:..::... 00% .:;: ...000%;- ';100%;:"';~00%: ...3~. 000% 1oo00o%
0S1 ..04 T t170440, 00041304:: 00100 OW : 0.0.~44t 04344004:0014::l%7ooo Oo :44444: 00407 %1 .-0000
90The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 8Geographic Concentrations -1998
I7QW %M::~.i4*4: alt &z1*4i:alt :~*$*i~ alo S% ~ ~ O .A' O l alt
O.'A Os '00 . 00 6
..... 0........ .0%~0. 0 "'' .. a
O O ..A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:.0.00% .. .0% -'A '"':$: 0-00*
000% ........ ~~~~~~~~~~~~...... 0006
3.7.% O-~~~~~~~~'.... 00 ~ 410.0.4 k .0 00 .0 0.0
0.00% 0.00% ~~~~... % :4
.:.:. .%>::.:.:.:.:.O00% *,::::. O -00 O M0.<'..0
0.00% ~ ~ ~ 000% ~~~ t.$O :OS.'
... .... . ~ . ,:'
..O On~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~. 0.0% O*..31% *.. ... 00%./.. .0
*fl~~o..' 7.24% :c.:.:.>$$: 000% ::~~~~~~~ x*.. 000% '% O- O.-. ..- . .04 X< <X 0% *<3. 00 <XX .< 00% 3 00 ... 0
0.0. SoO: .04009 0 < 0004 O... OO,
.00% .~~~ ~ .*....* .~~. ......
.00% .~.. 0.00% .:'.:xc:: . ..' :"0%<A .0 00. . 00 . 0O- ..On ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~..ik. .7 ~. .. 000
O 00%% «<01010.9970.. 000 000% 0.00%:.::«~<c. 00% 000% < ~ O 00- . 00.A0
.~00% 000 .......... 0O 00 O....-....
00% ::0*:02 004 >:: 0% '' 00%X004 .a.: 1*1 0%*1.' 0
00 <:WO 14 '. tOxj 01% O$$ 0% O$$ .0.4 ji '' 000 -A <Y' 00
00% $.~5t*$ 220% $X~*' 0.00% O :~ .0 XX$:c%:$f*t21% ~ , 00 WA 03U 1 7o,1:k:::01% ~~X 00 .>$$:O00% :n0004 :$ .00S 0.0% 00 < ' 0
004*XXX M.0. <l1*X -A 0. $$$:004~::< 00 :<>~<00 1~C00 O 0 ~ 00.00% .$A~~~~~~o&$ oars ~~~~~jj0<>7 ~ ~ ~ .% .-- oo.
O .,A~~~ 70l00% : X.1X100%:x.> S$SS X<MAW ~ ~ %~XX .0. ~ 00% ~ 004 :5: 0%$«.00..4*~~~.. 07 04% ..... '.. 000% 000.4 ~~~~~~~~~~~ 000%'"" .~ ~
-'A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00. .,-'A O.00.4 O0% .'"00O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00. '<.0.0 5.$ .0 4* .2
. ~ ~.x O 4: . .1" 0... 9
XCX$<.0.0%.%»» O.% 00% .0 O :~:~ 0.00 ..... 00 .'A0 O..%W4 O< 00.4 . 00..."'O-A"... . .... 004 "... .0
000%".~~~.'..' 000%.~~~~~..'".' 000%C<CCC$X 000 A O..000 <CC<C~ .00 .... C$ .00 ~ 004 .... O 4:.:..«..00 CC $ .-0-.-- % -'A 1~~~~~.00% 0O0 $$< .0 .'A 11 001......' 000% «<::« 0004 1«1::1:, 000 -on.'. 00. .... 0 0 ....... ''" 00% O
0090 .:C.:::<..: 000.4 r OC.'-'.... OXC . .% -.<XA0 .. «11::..o j ~..' 0...n 0. ..-n ovn O,~~~".'.......' ..'.......
O .i:.A*C07 ..:::::1 0%-00 O. '000% .,.....' ...A .. 1<:...'400
000.4 O 11 .0 151 00 00 - 0% :00%:)N 00% 00
: O515 .0 " 000 - 000
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 91
Appendix 8Geog.phlc Concnmtioo -1998
I. 0 %.:0~!: o. oo'. :%i'.: .0 0 .0 7. : : i:~: o.o i:'::~ii~ 7.0 oo
O 0 . ... 00......... .. 00... .. 0 . 0 . ..00 O..0.000 .00% .00% O.o% -0% X . -00% . n 00% 0% 00000% WA. WA%0% 00k 00 000% 00
O0%.U 3~%..~. %.." 000% 00 00% OO 7%
00% ..... 0% O. ~ 9 o 00 0% O.00% O.. .. 0%000%..'SU %..'.'000. oo ~ 00%..........,.... .. 0:...�.. 000%
000 -00% -00A...~0% '0% '~ 0%'..0% ' 00 00
00% 00"00""00I."00-A. 00 00 00...A 0O0000 .,.'A' 0% 00 O0% . '0A 0% 0% 00..0.% 00W% :::: .. ::: : :!:::: o. , :..W :j::~: 0;0 . 0 . : 00%
000%"~~~000%~~~ ..000% 000%"AlA'300%''A~~~~~~~~~...000 000%, O00 -A 0~~04~0%.L O0.. .' .. %'.'.... % .-00A 00O00-/ .. ... .00% 00%Oft~00 00%... 0% 0 0040'* 00
O00% 00% ." 00 0%1'00 000% ..00% 00. 00
.. -'0% 0%A00
00 . .'-*..."A 0 00 ~ 00 ..O .. ..00% 00% A 044kw.. .~~~~~ A A4~~............
000% ~~~x: 000% ...'.. 0 00A ~~~~ 0.00 0" 00 --- .% ..00. 00%. 32000% ..SU*. 020% "~~~~~~. 0 0~~ 000% 000% *:: 0~.00% *X :: 00%'00 O 39%
... O~~'b44 ~.... Ao
000% 000% 000 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 00% . 00%-'A 0.00% O 0,0%. . 0% 00.37% . .0.00% ......'~~~~~ 000% ..~~~ 000% . 000%........ . :.:. x:::o 0% 00000%;~:~i~ 000%o .:i'ii' .o .. 000%i~.~i . 0001 ~:~:i'~ ...:.:'.~!~ ..... 00%"'i:.A", .o..:':::': . o. ~ : i::'.: ~~:!:! o.~..000%:. 0i!: .00%..
'A 000% ~~~'~lA' 000% ~~~".. 0. .. '% 000% O0% ~ 54 ' 04 $2.3%00% 00% " '00 " ' %0% O0.00% 0.00_ .. B.... 0% ... 'A 0000% ,o .' :44%:...:: . %. '...- ..O.', 0% 00.:7: .0 1:: ::: 0. ,, ::00% 1 000%
.4oJ~o,........ .. ...........
OA O..~' 000 O.....00% .. 0% 0: . ,W00% O:3::~~ 0% 0.. . . -A00000..41 . 0 -%.' A~l. 0 . 00% ~ .30% -*: 0% 00% '* 30%"7'00..... 000% K 001.'..' .. 'AN::::O.A0 .:::' 0%W0 . 00 ~ 0000%::':0::::..:o.3.. :~.:':::: 000%~ :::.: 0o% ..':~::::..: 0.00% 00% ..'.' O.. 0::% o :. 0::
0Bk 000% 00% 00 00% 00 00 . 0% 00,,.A, 000%:~:~ 000k . 000::.::.:::::~i ~o.~~:: ::!::o.e .::O.:.3i.:::o34:ii:!i:X': 000.o ..:'..::::': 000%'..' 000%::i~! . 000%~:':.:~~~ o.AI..030 o<' .00% =%... 00k 00 .. .2 :A 00 '"*" 0 "'-..004 01
-.-'% ... .. 56-A 00%.00%...". 0 7A~:0.0 X 00% *' .93 00% . 00 . 00
0K 00 O.. .. 000 O.. 00% ... ' 00-% O: -0% ::: ... 00% O 000% .- OW00% 000% ~~~~~~. -, 000% . 000%-: X.. 3'3.3.% 3.:3 -A . 0...' 00 ... 2.. 00%
x-0. O..% O...00% . '.0043% O..%00O::::.::%
4M~~~o .dlA~~~. .sl~~~b~~I~~. ~ O '0oOo06 A O.3 Og 7 4
.0 . 000% . .. 411
00%.'0001%''~'0 ... 00.00..'0 .00. 0,0
000% --'073 O.00% O'*'" ' Y0 .. $U 0% .... ' 0% '9*'10% 00-.::l::.00%!00%:.:~:..:`:~~: . 000%. .00% 00% 00% 00:. 040k.................i:! i:~~.~~. : !'00% ~ i:! o./.: i . , , .!:!:!..' : !:~:!o.oo.,~ 000%!... : !::!~:~ 000% . % ." ~.'.':o.. 0:0:::0%~:!: o.~,,, 00::0k : ~:'.':: 000%. ., ::.::::. 0o.0% O.
000 O "~00 ".': 0%..'''* 00 "l~ 0%~00% .499..037% 000 O .. A A .8
...%..0..... 0. % . 01. ' 004 00k 00 . 0% ..A.00:.%::2 . . . ::::0:%:::::: 0.0.% O. 000% o'oo.::.oo ' 000% o."." 0.::%
O00% . 000% . 00%.WA 00% 000%'...... .. 001 O ....' .A04"""'AOM% O.---,,. ". kW .o6A
00% ....'~. 00% .... '~.' 00% "'.3A O00. 00k .- ... 000 ...A" 00% O0... ... .0011% . 00% O..00 .. '.00 :4$ 40% W. .000% B3.0' 10% "*" 00% %% 4000.% . 000% . 000% O.~ 00 - 0% .. 00%''''....,00 . 0% 00
....... A...............o* . .O00%'. k 00% 00" 00% 00 0%.0%..
O0% 000k 0% 00%''.'00%'''''''O k"'''''0 % 00% 0.0W%-.-. ,'. 000:"".' 00 oo.:.oov. 0. 000...... 0'0 , ::::.: o. ': ..."%O 'A 41.' 7.*50 .'AA4*1 . . WI.. ~
.. *'U A 04 O.90" . ..% O'"" .00% ....00k' 00 000% 0.20::::::::::::... O 0.00% "" 00 , O 0% :.::'.:00:::: . .%.
-'A .. %~~~ 00% .00.00.00.00
.O.% O(k ~I WA t4OA b .I0500 . : 00%"".~.¥0 . ' 000% ':00% : .'!:0-%:!!..'.'.'."00!!0%!!.!i!i.."'.'.'.'.'.'.".:0:00%'.'.'.'.'.'.'...''!00:.0%!iii~~~!' ..'' ;~~i~!i~~!~!.'~'"~ ~!i!~~ii'~~~~05 130% 000% 000%.~~~~~O^ .0k.. .. 000. 000%.00k.0.00%
:00:.'- k: 0o . :::::~ 00.% :"~ .' 000% :'"."'.0::k o ".o ::'::::::oo.. :0::::::..:: . 000% 000%:: ::: o .oo..'... ::::::: '.'.oo .: .'.:::::: .00k..O% . .:. 0 .O.... 0%: .000..:: : ......... :::! . 0... ... 000' O..009. 0014
A*A AlA. 4o14o. :~::~:,,4UO- ' R '...".O.. .A 'A~ .~ . b:::.A::3:0:i" 000% ":"'.' :% ~SA ii~~:~:: 000% :~::i! 0.00% ::~:i~i 000:i '"' 00k 00 :i;:i.;:$O.O,:::!. .':i .' :i~:::: 000'* : 0i:.00%:3~
000% 000% ~~~~ 000%'.".'."..~~~ 'A W% M % 1% 2M. 21-
:::"::: . ': . , 00: . .'0 00.' ... % O O O.:% O , 0:::::::::O00% ', :::::V:: 000%:::::::!::':::: 000k~ %:.:.:::: 0.OO% :::::::: .0~:::.::'-.% .004% : : : % ::::: . * .::::::::0 .:%:::: 0.00'%:::.':::::::::0.00.~ ::: : ::: .0 .00 .':::::::::: 000'.:::~::'::::::::00~ ::::~::aO/ ~~i~~: .e/ 000%i~:!i~ : '::'.':':': 100:::0:%~i~ " .5*'.' 40:0%.~ "l' : 7341'4'~ 'U ' ::0::08 270%'~ ~::~~.: ..~S ::~':.'. 000% '* ::':.:.::: 000%:::"::: m .::.3X00 50':::: 3.:",
O.::::.'::::::A : '::.:.. 000%, 00%. 00 % :::::: O. 0.%~i~~~~~00%0 *'* :!!'.i 000% :'.':~::.i~ 0.0%~ :i:5:i 0.00'/k i~:!:::'' 0.00%,' :::'::::00% :":.:'!': 00% ":!::::". 0.00% i~~~~i .,
0014.'~.:~ *2'~'::'''*ii~~ 700%.';.':~."'.ii:7 0.00'. :::":!ii 0.00%,.~~:~~: . 00. 0:0:: '.0O 00e'. ~:!:::i 0.01 AlA 1W.:i::ii:: 00%.:i~i:i:.: 00%. ..::::::0.00k.~~~~~~ 0.00% ...::::.' 0".0% 0k '*"""':0::.~: : 00:: 0.00% ::::::::::OO~:q:::~" .',:":':~~ 0.00k; ::~: .''::i:::':!000% ~:i".'i:: 000% .'.'..:.3:i:. .0% :X::::i : O X ::.:iii: 0.00%,' ~ii~::: 000% i~ ~~~:: 00.". i:!:ii.ii 0.00%, :.:."~:::.:: 0.00% *i.:!::i!:.: 0.0OO',
00%:.....~. '.'' .:::::::.. 00'*.. .::::::0:00 � 0.:::::::.:000'; ":!::'::': 0W """000" .:i.:::i.: 000% ! ;!:!:.'3:i .30.X:: :~:: 000%. :.:.::.:<:. 0.00"/
:o .. 00 : .:.::': 00% .. :::.::00: '.' 384% 0 : 0%: .0: ::::: . :::. 00,0::::.:~ W .oo. 000%S:i! : oo :::::::i: o .oo' 0 WA::'.i:.~:oo :.':::X:: 0.00% ::.:i::':000 '3..'... '0% ..!:::: o .o .:::::: o.,o", 0::::%::::::oo%
WA":::.::: o%:::::::::'~ o~ 0::'.'::::: o0o% ':::::: o. o0 %::.':.':...A0A:. : oo, ::': %..:oo . :::::o.oo:::::00%~ ::: ::: 0:0 0.o.%
00:!~' : : 00:! :001 ~.. 00014 : 0.00% i.q:~:::i]...~:.:::::i!~ ~ i:i*:.:i:.: . 0 A 00 .:'.'.i95iiA .q%.:i:::~~ 523%. ~ . "'~:::~::oo.i!i:~~.:o4:;.¢. ~.Al0.:..~~.~:: :iii : : '~/o:A..:i.':ii : . .~~~c:b~::~'~i : : : : :.iA.0A .i~.i!i!i'::~;/.i:-.!~!!!~i~~.~ i..iiii-~'~)ii..~~~~~'~
:::::::%: : "~.3"'. WA :.::::::%:: o.oo% ::::::::::::%::o . 0007 ~::::::::: o..::::::: oo * ::::::: 00*0:: :::% :::::::::: o o'::::.:::::: 000%,
-*: ok 0 0k
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 92
Appendix 9Geographic Concentraions -1997
O MIA NAME T.. .. ~~Ti tI T0I T~ ~. oo 100. O~.To ±:TO.21% 1. 50% 000% . OW *. 00% ..... 000 * . 2. 0 0
2 ANJ., 0 : oooTo 00 00 . o.oo,, . 0 . 0% . .0 003 Al-o OH 0.00 00 . . 0 . 0 0.: o.oo00.%
4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- .- A11 MA, . .O
6 Ubuqu;u[Zia, ..U ji OW )li 1~OW:::::::::::. ~ ij~~~~U"A W/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o. : : : !!o2eV7...-B ~ ~ ~ ~ .0% .0% .. 0 O0'. 0% ..A00% 00 .5. 0% .. ~ o% Oo
o. ooA.A'~loa .R · o ·n ·0% :0 . 0 I oP-- .00 .0M............ 007 .1nU1 .52 -1.. 0% ..... 0% 00 0% .00% >....00. ~ 00% 0002 Moi~loo /2. 000% 00% '~'*' 000% . 00% . 000% ... 000% "W 004% ...O000% 0.00
12It A !.! !;O ! 000: 00% ..,:::..:.0 % 0: .. 0 % -00% :1 ...'
00 At.AltIt O .0% 'A0O.- e0 ..- 0 00o0%21AemaP ihle- D y mnouth MA !.oe,o~~~~oor Door ~~~~~~~~~~~~ o~~~~~ooy Door ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ooo/07A qooo.A o o.% . 0.0 ................. X.. % .. 0 ... 031 Boe Oty ID o.A 6 .,OooO
... ......... .IC 000%1 Brc .0. 00.,e., -OXl 0.00% 2.72% B0,to TX091 .~~~~~~I 0~~~~~~~~~~.o2~~~ B-..W.Y MA MD.% ~ oo OOD22 0.oooool-Poot 001.00120 0.00% 1~<C: 0.00% <' ': 000%~' 0.00 0:.00%
-h3? ~ ~ $oo. TX ,ca'0 .t. 0 . .21 .- 1 O ..A O -A Os ~~~ ~.007 %00% 00% 0.% .... '...
21 C-H-tlo W o .. %20 rAILt .000 0 .T00%l- 000% 0 000% o 200,20 ~oog1. 00 0.0% ::A~:~0 0% ::$~0.0% ::~1:: 0.5% ~1:::0.0% ::: 00 . 0 0% :0.4%4 0.00% ...'A. 0. 00%21 . AL'" % ' . . ::!:::i 0?OO'ii.' % .:.':!<:.:%::::!�:.'.i.0%22 l 0.0M% &M:S~.00% O 0% O 0% O,.. 20 . 00%2 .- A O M% ~~~~.~ . .... ::j ..jj -A 070%
4?-/d.M H. ..A ... ..AM-n~ o oo%2 O-t .S.O o 0% 0.X O .-.iU 000% TN00 o0 : ... * 0~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oliii OH oo% ~24 00000.720 0.00% ~ 0.34% 000% ::11 0.0C~& .. 0007. :: 0.007. :~::::~ 0.0O7'.. 0 . 00CR <:<, : 000% I: O 000
20 000.oo0010..00001.0.g.0.Ooo :, ~ to 0.00%1~:0.0CR.$~..... 0.00% <...~* 0. % . 0000 ...~. 0.00'A .~...~.. . 0.00% ............. 0.0CR "~'...CA
27 O.Corns 0000 SC 0.0 *X...00% 00% ~ 00% .... 0% ''~ 0% :~ 0' 00 .I00%,S CRohuLA~ OR-A o.~ o* D.O~r o%.W117 :·O) : ~ 0.. . o -.UM ...' 00 0.0.O11~: M..A 0% ...« 00% 00
0 IL. . 15r O 3ooO.01 . 0007 -2 0.0x ~ ::::00R::.~~ 0.00%- K~:~:: 0.0C O 00C 2 0.% :<x 0.% .- O .0 ~:: .. % . 0%42 0.H..l p-'01. Too.o 000% *: 00% .0 .% - O..... 000 M 0% ~ 00' :0% -'A 00% *" 0C
"? .... .... ........ 0..21C 000.0 000% A: 00% 00%:00'.. ~ 00 .1 00 .. ::00 C,1**:..0.% %4753 Ool O00.ICY.004 . 4-7%. O.0CR .0.$. .1.1.1: 0. A O.~ 0M0:%~ 0.00M.0 .. W.0 .0%M::<1.< 0%
50 D. I N. 0. 00 00-0 o. IA.IL 00000 . 0.00%B...tytont lle d~ L iia . oo. o00
B tr_-Splut& On Oo.% · .j:. DM ... :% .oo% ., .1(Ii~s *~Dor~~i w neu~ **y.w ;':~~ol, o.oo ~
.. DS-%O X...'O........I:- -W W D,00300. 00W!
21C000 GoCha .. ~ 0.00% M4-.-0.00%0% 0 0 . ., 000%
22C17 eo PA0. 0.00 . O=0 O%d3 itov lo.odllol d.tO 00* Ky1. % 0.:: :.::: 0.00 0.00% I :1 .00% . .. 0 . <: 00". :::~:~:~: 00%09Drun~ll-oo0000.llTX;·~~·I 0.07 LO3~ 000 ~"W~ <'<o, 1~,;p. iii 00· 0 ..~m~.;.....0.007 0
::..kk .::00
: Oo0 :«:.::: 000%.72 Mint~ll· ~o i oooo
0273 2.044010 420% ~:~*~$: 00% 000% ~ 0 007 Pl:l(n C 2.49 o.oo%:: 0.00'0 :::: 0.00% .0 : :1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~00 Cbl~o'<h~ ~ ln~I 000%X D.' : LW'*W0.C .':..::· 0.0%" .1... 0.0070.00%dn.-uta~l~o~~tNS C ooou ~ Dor oo ..,. X 1.0:· : .MTI :~i~ 3.:1Y f.I:: :.0(r* 0.074 F aAortr CoUaILodm CO i o o o ~ P
72 F7oa '[ -C Co Y0 0.0R, 0.0 ii 1 0 : 0 :::: 0030.. O0
Pi-P.s /. 007 s 0% FL ... 0.40 Oo~o~o~l~o.O~ooO~o~oo 0.0-KY 0,00% ~11:?:.: .0% '< 00%<:::< 00% .0% :<X:.:.:. 0.0%.;: :~..::~: :: $:/.::<':i:: :: ..:.: :0.00:::;:. ::::: :::::*::~ 0.07% :1:::::::: :::0.0:0~:;.'' : i:.'j;:'.~:!: .:'~".. .;:: ?: .!''.~: :.::???i 0.00%;~~.;.2% O.42% 00CR 0 . 000" . 0,3 ~~~~ ~t~.m ~i w
7 . l!-!.... o.wo : . ...!: ..::. 00 :X!! .0CR i:: . : :.0:::::::0 .... O.::'.:: 000 o ..,114 70/e0 dt CooLo .d C:O ~ i,'~ 0.00%~ ii~i'~! 0.00% i:i:::::, 0,00% i:i:**: O0, 1 ~:~!::o0~ i;:::~~ 00% :'::~:: .00',::: :: ?% i!:~~~~00s. :'~!~/i!.
% 00CR ::.::. ole,;. .::0%?:? : 0% :!'i::!:::: 0o.. ..:':..::.... 0.0 :::::::: 00.%
77 000~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~?~~?~i 0o :~i/??io., i?~?io.o~o00. .:. . i?!: ;?:.0!;i. 000% i *.~i!~"'? o~;:i;!~i o ??i?!i!: o~?i[i:~oo.~ *:*x::ii: o.0
70 700, ,, : ?:..K ".'<;??? 0.C oo~ W:;:!::: 0.1,:2%:: 00:0%:::..: :o.::;?;:~o o ;.~:::~??oo~ !~~~i?!o o ':?::'.?i. o: o :;::di o. :::;::0o
..??=Y. ,-s;,1o0,00,d=70. 0::'f? . :O:::0::::: oo.< ~::.0:'..t0o. ::.:0 .; 000% <'1'00% 1.~:::::. 000%~ :.1::::: .o. .:::~:: o0oR .:.:'.os :::::::::4 000:'h?:::::o~9,.PP~~,;s~~ :.. , ~: . . .. .~.O.%80 7000'ol1.AndOH TXW 00 'I " 0.04%"~t. 0.40% :XM .1:: 0.6% ''' 000%ii~i' 70 ''... 10I 0,0 -eo i '": :o': .0 :,.::-, 0
1-
100% " :':::" &"'::: 000% CAO * 'n*OOOR 0 .00 :::: .%oo
020~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~·"'' --_.-'''* ...'.:' '..','... '.00.- . ... 000% *1<:".'-... ·. 00..o4.1.:*.. -0.*...0%·*:.:-.::.:...:.:o ' 0C02 ,7o..ro CA: .: o.oo. 0 :L. 0 . :::. 0.0CR :.....':::: 00.0% ::::o.4 000 <::::.::. ::0:: oW. o
80m~e 00070.0..0070 >1~1<~t.~1o.oo :i:0:0:0%.: i: «. o . o.00,GMA.1 H tteA m V--O :::::A::::::,: .0A'::'::::L:: ::~::::::: 0W 0 ,: O.* ::1::: :: o...::::::::::::: :::: :::: 00 :::::00 Oo~~~~~~~~~~~~od 70,0.070.1001 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~x-e:x~ -
90 0o000000'2000000.0oo.00o 7000 NO .0CR 0.22 :::i13a 000% 1 3' 0.CR r 00% ~ 0.00%:::11W M00% .0 00-':': ' 0.00%
02o h ,, , i.'~.' . . " NC" .00 ::::*:::: 0.00% 11::...1::1 0.00% :1::::a1::: 00% ~~ o.0 :'.: : :~ .o. : : :;: 0007~::''.~. 0.00% 1:;:i"::;:.: .007' ::::::~ .0 :1:::1 00%::11::;1 0.00.,
940o00000 ,.00 ,*< 00 0~:~~~~:"~~ ;iii~~.`~~i~:;~~i .00% ii:!`ii o. :....:..... .'i.... 0.0. 0.00. '. .~i~~:!:i 1: 0.00% :!:::i11i: 0.00% :i::.':. 0.00% 11:11:1::!: 000
9 0 O.bootL.mb o..OI P 'N0C .111.'00 ':.r1 .0% :::::: 0% 00 . « 0-00 O111111 .0
07 bi d !0': 9 oo 000% 000% om. 22.:111ito1::: 0.00%1o111:111: .0% 00C~~~~~txu .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x ~~~~~~~~o~,* i~i!;~ o.W,
11 -.,- - -0 O- 0.00% * .* , D . ..:11 0.007'. :·:·:: 00 :9. 1.12%% ::W: OWA : .: .08000.1..g0 00%DI O 1<11 14W 000%~r "< o... e 0,00% 141<1.1< 0.00 R . 000% 0.00%:~~~~~~ .(· :~"1<4"i·: 0.00%o " 0.00%:~::~ '*"' 000% "X;;'~;:: 000%
000 OOO.00 NC O-0000oO 070.10M%0O.,.. ....%0hi1.041...00
13:C.- W~Ip..bg.Ad- SC .. , -.. 1.1 . 14.?%O/. . .0 ........ .002 H.oo.'o L 00% AI. PA .--A M0% O11' 0.% O00% O' 00 -''.4411O.0% M:::11:4 0.% -A.:< .0O---22%*'Q~'1 .0 .0 . .0% 04.'00 ''0.'1 00R~:10% 4 O::~ .0 007% 01 0.0
1n :::: .0 O:::::::. % ::::1:::::::0 0::::::: O. % 000:, -: 0.00 %
FL 3,.% O00%.14W14 00%14<44
, l ~ : : :::: .P oe~ :::.w:::: o.e~:::::: o.oo.PA:'::::::ooo,::::::.:o.,. .;::::! o.:' 0e,!i00: ::- o. oo :'...o o . o00%o.
102 K-oo..l. k0.0%~'''< 00" .... A '<0.CRhiK11 M .0... .. 00% 0.0 :<:<<' 1W
O O./. ..M% 1.52% ..-A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 .07' .::. .0% 1«4<. .0".0.00.~ o~o 111o:< 000'.
L.. W.., 10 A:.I O.: :.:*:4:L. % .1' .00% 141.f!!ii!
0!o. 000%. 1;:1!.0 1:'.'.'r.`.0%?:.!1i: `.:. 0.20% :':o : ,.0% . : : : 1: .00%
018 001.700.000 00% 113h*:::: : 0 .::: 00'' :::::::::::: 0.00". 0.00:. . 000 : .:: 0.00% : 0.00%007' :,y4.<~,~ :1:~r ~ I~Y is·'' ,,12 .104.00oO000. 0' 0% 1411.< 00 40...: 0% 00. .0 :::%:: 00% O.11.. 0%:00 . 0
122 0..oo.0c.o A 007'. ·'::-:': o.0007' . oo ... ~~ ol ~ ou ;71 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~''1 0.007'.tnuroP 11'11W11' 0.0% . 00% "< 0.0 :::1:7007.~ 10007'. oD1 '<11 .0 15'51< .C
93The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance,
I. iiw...... --
~~~~~~~~~~~~: o oo~,!, L. H..A1 Lu.ou ..
o~~~~~oor~~~~~~~~ o~~~~~~oo~~~0.0"I' U.ddOH 0*
0.OD~~~ ~~i~ 0.00* O.W 0 . 00131 l~~~~~~~~~~~~t Aigelel-l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ms~ Bet,.k CA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11'A ~ .~ n133 .uod TX O.00
.On~~~~~~~~~p ~~~~~~~~~~~o.00 ~~l
t36 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m Msdho WIwt37~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 MMud O..I~wu ~iSS· LaOY : Med~o~-A~Md o~.o ~ i~- o.oo
o ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oo:i oBo.,
X~~~~~~~h.C. TN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ou " .I w
XXK: _AW·149~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... .l(li~..~ ...... -00
LA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: .,I%
I12 Cql ,
IsNe Ode LA159~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W" on-, -'A iMA IA O 0.00%0-
16 Oltd NE-A .A
164 Os-Vd C-d CA 00.00%
1, A 1~1 ' Odnd dii. o.oo% .5- O... c~=,I -A t}: 2I.,
193~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..Ar ieoi-Pki IL .0
......... .~ ... . ..... ......
17 P-W,~ FL 0000
MI1 Pic. d-ql mc~Fu PA 2o0 oB2
194 P-m O= 0
1§7 $.& .MIO Wx .f '19l sm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O Zejl CA..
19[* Sin FrindlCO C~ O.00'A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
IO Slu7t1toA CA oo
209~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O Sh3A r o MPA o -
21 D~Qield CKA 0.00%.
218~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~I -A, E
219~~~~~~~~. , ,.~.~= i--N..bL.awu Lo,
224 S-~ A 0o.
227 --,'/ler4 '' o . oo
24qdKS .0 .OO
238~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' y o 'A i0-%
239 LAd P..o...S.'~~~'"~. -~'.A ;!;!..; i: ~~i::' ~ ''~io*
~Pt- i ....
' 94
Appendix 9Geographic Concenttions -1997
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
App 9endx G-Waphi C-ne~t.oins -1927
O: - 2.2.'i~C~~~~~~~~~~~~i~:i: : ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~O., .. :: : : O0C
:O::'A:i: : .' o f ...' .. :..: ::.~~~~~~~~~~~O.
i~.!:~::~::~ : O.. O""'~ O:! :!~iio. . :::: I[ - o. - : Oii~::..' O--oc~.::::::::::~:~:!: 0o O.~ ,o :K~~! : : : 0,.2 :::::::::::::::::~!~:i:~:~:~i : O. O-- .. -A mm O.
~ ~.~..~.......~..~~~.~~ . . : ~~~~~~~~.. ..n''''''o .... . .... * O. * ..-. .'...-. ........ .- A O....... ._........ _
:Oi .::'oA .:On :::~~i~ ~ ~.iii:~~ ~~::::~i! " -'!i ~~!i:::~.i~ ~ ~i:::i:oos~!: o::::~:::0o~::'.:::: to,.::.:::::e~.~:::::~::. o~:~:.::: ~. ::::.::: o, .. :::::..0o ;':~.~: 04%.:m'~.?~i::i.:.O!.''.. ii:A Oi: ' ' O:i :' !ii :i .~'~J.%*::.~."~:'~:~!i~ii ~i:~ :iiii...:!?: i!::::: :''~:i::.*.:::::~:i:~:i: ~~~~O- 0o.~ !'"~::~"~ ii:~iiioo :i:~i%~ o.o.% :!!iii~!~Oi~:!!~~!"s::!!!:~i!":!iiii:~ ~F::~!i!i!
::::::...;O.O :::::::: o.A::::::....'A : : . c::: 0o :::...'A ~ i~~~::::!oo i:.!~:i0o~ i~~i::oo.~ii'.::ii:'Oo:!:::~i~i.?.i:::::~ii..:~ii'.:iLo..~iii:i...~.i~~~.~H~., . ::i~~ o, ::iiii::oo~O.i! o,~:~~~ii: %.
:i::~:?~:::o~o ~::~:::: o,~ ~::i::i0 - o .O. i2i!:; :i: -'o. !::i .::~ oo~::iii o ~ .. '::ii A o iiii O,.~ ~~i:~: ,i::!~:~:!: oo, ~:~::~i~:~O~,~~.c:::::,o :::~~:i o. '!!'~::!0~ i:~!: o~- : : : ~ : " o~siiiii~!io~ ~~!.i::o:::::::::.'':~ ::~::~i::i:ooo~ '.:i:!ii~i: o~o~ ::::::.:::.c0o.~ ':'.*~:::::::o~.~ :~:::::::~ o~o~ :::::::::::..:.::.: : : : :::::::::::::::::O
:i'i:.~::::::::~~ o~::::::::oo~:~::::.:o o ~:.!..:: ~. :::::iiI O::i '.-i:,~i:~ii ,~:iiii..'! o. iiiii~ioo.:~i:~::~::.'::: o~~ oo,:::::: oos:~.::::! , !ii':%ii O~:i~i::0o !~~. 0o %ii!!!o~. ~: ~. :~i:!. ~.:..:.:..::: 0o :::::'::::o.o%.::::.:: oo~ .:::.'.:.: oo/.:*:-::...:o.o~ ::..::...:oo%.;:-::::Oo .:...:;- o0 :::''""'. oo
0.~ ::.~::: o~::::::: ~o.':A : : !~ oo~'~:~!::~! o.~~ ~..'~ : i:i::::.::~:".': 0oo.~ ::~::~ : : : : : ~ ~'}.~~~~~~~~~~O. O.'A - !:i..A:..~O, O~~!:: ooo% Oi! oI i'.'.~~ O-- :~::.: o-A : Oi~!!- ,-A !: O :i:!:X:~i~::0o :::.: 0. :ii::... ooo:~::_.~ ::, , ::::::~: oo~ :::::;::: o~::::: ::ooo~::::::'.::~ 0 :~:!:::~: 0o :i!::~i:':oos.c::O--:: 0o ::'.'i:::ioo:~!i:~:i~~::~%~(!ii~i~~i~~;"~ i!:~~i! "~ ~1ii!~~!i !!~::~~i~i,...i~!iii!iii.o..~..i.-:i::iO ,,O.!O: .!n : -,. .::..::' 0,......... ::::'...i~~? ~:~i~~*'~:*~~..ii'..'~i:~ ~~~i~~~~:::''::::.:-~ii~.:.::iiiii~~!i' ~ ~!! i!'~::::~~..~: ~:::::::::::::O ..0:: o ::.%:::oc :~::::: o.~::::~i~ .~!~ii:~:0o. ~::~::i:oo. ~~:i! ,. .. :::iii 0o,:::::::::.. o .::~1:: ow~:::::::::: o. .:...::::::: oo~:::::::~:: o~ ::::O:....ooo. : : : ~::::~~. :::::::: 0o2 : i]."l~'::1a*;
:::::::O .OO.A :::: ::::o . : :::: . ::: Xo. ::::::::oo1 ~::...:::oo. :.5.:.:::::oo7::5 ' ~¢:~~~::- o121 oo. WA::~.::-'... '..........**........................... ............-' .. '....A........... ....... '.. ;: ~.;. ....:...:::.': ...::i.:..:::::::::::::::. : : : : ::::::: :::::::::::::::.i.!i:::!i:ii:.i.i.:.i:::-.i:..:::::!'':i'~::::~::.. o~~::::: k o~~:::.:::~ o. :k!!!::i oo :ii!:~:0o. :~:: ~ : : : : O : : : 0o ::::::: o ?!%~ii ~i:.":~:~:i~i~i~i: o Lo A .,..A: 0 -'::.::Ao. : :'O::: o .:'A~i~2~:.:.:'~:: ~o~~i~: o~~:::::!i0o~ :-ii..:::~ o~:i::::::::::: ,o~ ~i~i::~:i 0o.~ :~i~:~i~i~! Oo.. i~-% : ~o .::.~::i.: : ..oo.A ...'A::i:i 0oo i~:::::~ ~:::: ::: oW :IA i:::~]O!~i!~ ' ! ...i'Ai!! iO!? !;ii WA!ii. ~.'~~~~~~i, ~ ~::'i.: o. :::~:iioo.~i~.::~ii 0
~:*ii!:*::~ ::~~j i: :~ :i~.~~i~"::.~~iii~~i~::*~:.*:~!i::!:.:'.'~!.:~:'~~!.:'.~.'"i~~!~!~i ~~/~J!!!!.* ii."!:..'!!i!~i!:.:.''I'':::::::::~ .M...I::.~:;:::.~:oo. ~:::::::oo~::::~:~oo~ :!c::~: o~::'.e.: s.~::.:?~ o. ::..~. %O--.Mi:i: 5o.20':: ~~~i!ioo. ::1:::(oo~~i~!:: ~~i:.::::! ~ ~~".:~::oo~~~!~i:oo !:::'.:~o,O..:. O::0 :::M::ii0o !ii~: ,. :i!ii~.:oo~:::i~i: ,~:"i~:~ o :~:::":~:0o ~:ii~~:"oo ~~:.iii o-!:ii A. . N:i:::::!.2....!j :::.."".O !-!ii;.o...i.i. : !:....:~*:i!i.?~ (A i0~ ,..,.~i'i !i!..... ~i..'~'!io,:::::::::::::::::::~!.~:~:::::i!:..':iii~~::~::::.~ : : O-!!O*!: : : :%.:i...:~~.**;:::.~~~.~~/. i'...0..::: :.::.:: .~ :::.::~oo..~::::;' oo/ i:'::"''!oo. :::;:::: .o,,:::..:: o', ::::::: 0,.:::::::000i:~:i:~:~::::~~~~~~;: O.01 oo iO.--~::OS : : . .: .::.:.',A.:::;::,0S:::! ::O:(Oo, :"ii.:ii.00,~~:~::::i0o~~ ::% o., ::'O'::o':i~:.:::i::!:oo0 :!~:...:i~: o0,~:i::ii:~~::i oo.~ !:~~::i~~i~ 0o~ ::~i::~~: 00'. ~(::i:.'.: oo~ ~!~!:::!:: 0o~~::' : : !:::0oo iH:':!:i ooO::.: oo, .. :::!~!O..o. ii~::::oo~!!~¢:'i O-~ : ~:::.':'i : O..:: :::: O oo. O::: Ono. !k:ii:i: o :iii: oo-O,-,,.A!? ~i~iiO!!i~~i.OOii:~ ~IAii i~~~~: i :~!;:~~~::*::?':~:: s~o~:::'::::' .:~::::::: oo :::::::::::: ooo~:::::::::: oo~ :::i i o o~ :~::!::~:: oo~ ~:i~c::::: 0.~ c.:::::.% : O.o-
::.:.:.: O0%::::~:: o ::..:::: O~~4:~:::~ ~ :;:::..: O .~ O:~ ~~::::::: o .~ :.'.:~~ o~i:!i: o...................... ...., ' . : :0!!i:::oo. ::::!i: o . .. :~::::~: 0os :::.::::: oo~::::::::::0o. :::::':::O-':::'.:: A.
!:::i!!!::oo . .!i..O'% o . O!iii oo~i~...i0 :'::iiii o . :!!~::::0o. ~~~:!!Ao ..:.i! A~~'~!.:!0'
: n:~i~~l!! " (::i~i~!S~:i:i~: :~ii~..:ii!i'.'X:ii.. Oi 'Oi~~.i i%'"' i 0 WA,"~~.:~~~ ::~ ~::.:~i~i*':::::.':: ~::~i ::..~ ~~~~.]::.c~... : : : : 0o ::::.c o:::(. : : : i0o.~"j"~:."~::i::ii:~o o~ :i.~::::: oo~ :::i~i::~::o o~:!::::!:!: 0o~ :~::i!:~~:: ~,~~:~~::!~!~ 0,~ :ii~ii~~:i oo,~:i:~::i:: ooO- : : ;:- ! 0o.::::::::::::.'..::a- .,. .W::::!:'!i ,. i~ i : :.~,. !::~.ii O., :OO'i:..:i' 0o ::! :::i .. ..:::: o . %.i : : :O!0 .:.:A~~:0'O-.:::( i 0o i.'j! 0' Oi.~i~'~~~i!'"(~o~i!:~:::, . :!~:0o !:~ ~io~:~::.::,, :::::n ,.!~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~!~ '.'i Ox ~~:i$ .'~ : O~i !0~!i ~:''.'00 ~! :~ -A ~'.. .:0i :1A :: ':i :!~i :~i :ii~:'''i!! :! :~ii~~:.~~~~ :~i~! :~'~'ii i:~: ~~~~:~~:::i::~ ooo :::'c::~::o ,~::::.):::::0o ::::::~!::!,o :ii..:~:~i , ~':~!:::!~:', ~':~~:~i::...:....:.o."..:..::~ ~· '..:::~!:!:~:~ 0oo O O:::":-::'% O -:A: ... o.O%: Oi:.::ooo~:.i%.. i ,i::~!~i 0o ~::::.:::!0o ~iH:~ ,o~ it'~ io-M:::::~::0o.. : i'i..ooo. ' i-"::.'. o. ::::i::0o !::-.:.: . : : : : : : o i¢::: . o.. :.: o~~::~::i ~
::::::::::::~~~' : .¢t~~:: ~::::ii~~ e. :~~::: o. ::~~::~ ~: : : ::::7o~::.qi" ::::::0 . c..:..!! 4iA.-::::::::0o :::::::0o. :::::::00os :;~: 0 O A::i: o :::!!!::o, i:!i..ii:xx' .:::!oo :::..:ii~ o.:~:.'.'::::::::::: OO o -- ':' J:: a-, A:::::..::oo.:'::::.:::: oO_:::~~::: "...:...''' o.A"": t : " ,O.% ...vv. oo .. _...::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: ? .!~~ ~:~:..'i ]::. ~."'~~~~::'.iiii~!~!'':i''.:i : : :: :::: o'i. o%::::::oo%:::::::: o ::::::: oo::::::::o.::::::::o-::.~.. ':::oo.~..':i.~'':s~s:.%!':~' o.::iii~iii0 o : j:~~iio, ~ij : i ! ,. i:i:j:: : Oi:^' : : , : : O ii~~~: , ~~.:: oo~~-:i~ioo.~~::':ii o-A:: Oi..:oo . :..::.''i .oA .:..:.:.O%:i:::::i , ' . :0~~~: o~'!'.i::::: o~:~~:i::oo :..!::'i ~~ i~..~'" '" ,.)~..:!iii!!.."....jii~:~~!i ..~.~~i:".'ii:~!~o o.~~.i~ii:i.: ,o~:~~:~~:~i ~, ::!:.'i!!:~,o ... . :!U.: Oo.!:%i . i:!:o o. !:. i::i. i -o.!i ."0'..:'~i:: . Oi.:.ii:~.'' ii~' ~-"!' .S* O.¢..." O: .':Ai'/ ' O":! : : -:::.i.! '-'-~~ii:::~~~'.~'~:: :"!''i~ ':~"'/~'i~~ii::::']'~%: : ]~~ii' .!·...:::: oo. .S:.::O ,, : ~:~':~,,. D::~~~:oo ~~:. o. :O-i. A:oo .!! : :0i~, ; '.i~~~i0~~o~ i~i:~! o
!i~ii!:~:~:::: oo~ :~~:~:: L,~ :!~:~i~i~O O- ' - O::H~.::o.% '1:ii~ o i::::::,, i~i::ooi. : ~~:A 1,oO -~'."!i'-A o --A ii : .-ii:: O O!:O!:: . o1 .% I~~:ii ,~:iii ., O:".~i~ oO o,.~ !i~~!!:: o :.''.::A~ 0,o .~~ii:oWA:::::: , : . : % 0 o. ::::'ii!: " i 'A ii:: ~' ::::!~i .'~~'::~!!:o. ::!~~~~:o ~ '"(i~i! ~. :~i~':~:ooSol O "".,...A . 1! i...!!!.~~~.~~.i i '~.~~i~i!! ~ ::~ "'~'~ :~~i.:i.~'~' ii::i::i 1~':! ! 1::%::. /~~::: :~ ::~ :::::~' :~: : : :.:~:.~ ~ ~ -o : .Ag.::~s :;.:...:oo~~''':'::uo~¥::::::: o' :~::c : i~.~~~:~~}~:::~c:~~ ~~:::::::;~~;
:::.:::.:, '::~.::::: :::::.:::.~:;:::::*:: ooo ::::::::::: ....:.::.o.....''::::-: : o .:::::..:::.... ... i: °C::::.::. oo~ :::::::::,o' :::~::::o,~:.c::::.:i ~, :~:::::~! o~ ii::."~::oo, ::~.O.: ,,~~: !!:: o, ~i':~!! ."i~ii*:i~ .'.:?: ~.: ~.i~~i j.~:.~:~~i~~'. " .:~:.~.:~~'~ ~''~~ ~~'~~i i~I~ i:..''~'~:~ ~..~:~ '~i~~i~:~:.O O.~.~~: :~~/
~:'i'~ ' ~"-i::~::: :::::::~: ooo ~i:::~.."~:o o. !!~!.~::- ,o. :::..:.:~~:o o- ::~::::::: oo~ ::::::::::oo. ::.:::.A ooo::::!i: : ~o. ~ii'.:i...~.:~ o~~ i!:~~:: oo~ ~.:..-':.!:0~~ ::i~:.~.~ ,o~ ~!~i~!~ ,o....:..::..:.... : O ~i...: ooO:. ~::!:::i o.h:~i::!~~::!,o~.::::::::: o~::'.:::::~: o, :c~.::~::~oo~!:::..:!::: oo~ .:~~:::. ,oo ::: '...~o o~!i::O~:: oo,~ ::!..:.!: -o o'.:::.:::A~/. O!~:~:.o..~-:~:~::! .. :: .,O.%. :O:;:~ ... %. :::::!! , :::::,o~~:::::.. o~.:ii::ioo !:::~~~~~i~i!!i!:.*::!::8:::!.~::!~::A::::-'A: O.!::~i:!! -:D:A ;:!!:: :- !:iC:M~::::O.~-i:~'.::'~: o :..:.-O.::% -' -'A ::::::::, :: ..::::~%: ,, ::::.:: ':::!~i! ::-.-'.:.~" 'A"ii:~~~: ," i:!ii :oo:i:!:~:~:!:~ ~ ~ ...... oo~::::::~ o ~:!~~:: ...... i: ~ . ~ : : : oo ~::~. ,' ~~-.ii:~:~oo ~~!H:::: :..::..~.. o~:::::~::: oo ::::..:::::o o.~~...:;::;: o.~:~::::::::o~~ :~:::::::Ooo. ::::: ::: ... :'..A : : ..... :... ~ ~ i!~: oo
:i:!:~:~!!~i~~~~i.5.i!~5i~~~ ~!iiO~~ .~"q:::~~~~L ? Hiiii...% D..% . .0-ii! %io o ::::..":i: ,o~:~:::: .. ::::!A~~,o!:i::i: : O: :. - : : :~..::::! : O.' :!: L~.::': -! ,O-% : :~O;! ;!!i :.i!!~ ~.. ::~:!~~ :~!~ : ..:..:A ::' ':![;'t!!'::.:::: ! : : " " : 7 i%::: :: ~ ~~::~~..: ~~..: : ~'.:
i
-- - -. :; .: n nna <*:*_ n _.s -. : -- ---- nn- .......; -, @X .... ;:R -n- *>h-_-___.II_.Z a-
95
::.::::: ooos ::::. m:::: ::::::::: .ooo . o oo .. o oo.. : o.. :A 53 m: o
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 9Geographc Conceations -1997
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O.. O..A ......A- - " " " " " ~"~-~~~'~'~~'"*~'~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~O--% .. A Xo ao,,
........................... 0'~ W"A'~ ~' o o.:'~~~~~ o,
~::::::::::o o* .:::::.:_ .o,~:::::~:~ oo~ :::::':~::ooo/ ::,...:::.~:~:: ~o%!::::,:!: ~e*, :::::!:~ Go*~~!O: : : ~!i:oo'~~i~:':i~ioo*~ ::~~iii: ~o*.i:'':i~::~: ~o*,~i~:i~!.' o.. ii!i!':.~iooo,.iiii~~:~ oo; ~:::O:: O * . : : ii-::Ai o. ~:::~!~. oi~~ii~::~:.~oo*/ ::~~:ots4 ::,'.~~:. , o ~::::::~: ~~ :::::::~:o~o :'::::::::o o~:~::!ii: oo., :i!!..O O---.!i.'~~:~o.r
!ii~~* ~::~''.!!ii:~~~ .' i~~~i:~~~':.''!i!~~i~.:. ' i~~ i!~~i~:.'"~.;~~ii:iii~~i''~~~:::.ii ' ~.i!::~:Oi i-:. : ' : : ~!:i:iii ..:::::::. oo., ~::.,:. 0o%~:::::',: .0'::::::oo ::::::::oo,,:::::,:oo ':::::: o*.:::::::::o,:::::::ii:o',::~i~~~i:::i: . O-i O./. O:::::::!to ; :.i.:::ooo : : : : : : : : ..:.:.'A. O~8.:~:ooe ::::~i~ o*.:~ii!'::o.e.~~:'~~:: ..
WA .,W:A .,..::Ai o~::i:'~~~i!o o., :'i~!ii!ooo. iii!4~~! 'o'.~!i!! .o !''~:: ~..~!!!::: o.. :'.::i~~:oo:::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: b ..'~::::::::::::~.:d~i::i~~::ii~::~..d'~~:~i~:::~!::;~;~~i!::~ ~:: ~:.:i .'~. ~::::::~::O ;(~ ..' :O ~::~:'i'
:i:i~:ii~:oo.~:i::::::: 0 o%:::;:::::~0.o :::::.;::: ~o%::.::::::;: ~o*, ::::::::: e-'A::::: ooi : : : ~~!::O o o.~ :::::::/ oo,::.:Oc:::~~*,i:':ii!o o~~i!ii!!~ .o~!~~::'.:i.:oo,::::!~!..!oo ::::!.:: ~~::::?!iio~ .:i!~~i~ oo/ :i:~:'.:o!!~!.!i! o , :~::~!::: ~o.,~:~~::~:: o o~::ii:::!i~ o.,,i~i~'ii~~ o oy .:.i~i:i e~/ i:iii:::i .~~ :::i~~..:: o~; :Z:!::i o.
~!..~::~!i::~ ::::~i~.::::.~..!:?::::::~:~;i~::i!ii::*: .".~~i~.:!i:~:~~';.!:Oii-:: ;-:;-: : : : i O : ' '.:~ i:! -A 1..!::::!:i0:;i'.:!:!:~::::::::::O-- ,, :::::::oo::::::ieoo :::::: o o~i~!~~ii :'. : o.~ i: o~ ' .~i:i~: o. ~~~~~~:o.:.::.:::::: ooo~ ::::::::~:o~o%:::::::::: ooo ::::::::::: .o*~::::::::::.:o~o*. ::::::::::o::*~:::i!: ~ ooo :~i:ii:!:o o* :~.*~~.~!i 2.,
::-:::? i443 ::%:::: X o~ :*:'.*:~oo* :*:::::: . O',G O::::::::: o.o.. -A:.i~:: ooo~~ii!!~:i ~Q~:::::!~ o' !:::::00,
~!:!:~:!:!: oo o ...~::::~::oo..~::::' o.. ,~~!i .. !!.!i O-o*-: !iii::- ~ % Om ~::::: -Ao,.:.~~~:: oo ..:'.::i~.:o o'i::!~:!:: oo~.~~.:::~:::i~ °~~ ~::i:'i'i~!: ~o~,,. ~i~ii~ii~i:: ooo~ :!:::~::~:!o~o~ ~!:i:~:~ .oo/. :':.!i!!~;ii o o~ i~i~iii.:~! oo~:i~.:X[:'..! o~~~~~~~~-.:..*..:~:o~ ::::: %o/ :::.:::;.:oo~::::*:::~o % O.:::::' oo. ::::*:::: .o'/ : : : :0o% ::::* o* :.:..~ *:ooii ~!i~i..~ ~~~:~~.....~::i~i~~~~!:.~:::;ii!:::;.~.~~!~:~~::::~ ~~:::::::.::~!i,"'' .~~i:: ~i~~!.:: ~!~!:::::::..::~!~!:::M ':-::.::: oo%... : ;.;.: : : : : : : :: o.:::::::::. .:.::.:::..~.::::.:~....:~.): ~ ~~::~~~~:.~~:..i'..~ ,
O.iiio-. ::i-: oo. ::.:.::: .oo/ ::::..::, :O!i! .%i oo iO:..:i , i!~~; o. :::::::: o ~~~l~i o,· : ... :::O- -A O::.:: ..:::.::A::oo.,:: ::::::0oO :::::::: oo., ::::::::oo., :::.:::.:0o%!!:'.:!!~~ o 3!~~:::~::ooi:::~~::..,.°~,~!i~::!:..°.,°,_,.!i!~~ ,o.~ .'!~!~!.:.~.~~'.!ii ~.~-~.,~~:~::::i ~...~~~~~i,.~.2.!i.i!!!io.. O ~~ ~ o.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-A':::::::::::: o~~ !~::!::~::~ ~e~ ~:~~::~:o~o*~ ::~!:~~:i!:: ~oo*,, :~i:~:::: ooe~~:::::':::::o~o*~ :::::::::::: oo*,. ::::::::::: .o.~ :!::: :~: oo*i~:[C'~!::~:~:: 00~% *X:~* O9%::*~:4¢* %:::~~ -'0,.!i:'J:::I.1A :::::::* 0*.% O::::: .: : : O0y -::::!:'-0', ;:-*:46.
!::;~::::::::!~ ::~i~:~;i~:~~'. ;:.~:~~i~:.:~.b~ :~!:::i~::i;; ~':,::.:~i:::.:.:.:~ ;i~~ i~~ i!.:'~ 'ii~ii~: ~ii~ ' :~ ~ ::~~:~i;~ii~ ' :Oi--:::-; .OO .:.:A :::',X:::::::: oo, : : ::.:q~: , o~::::::::::o o ::::::::::.oW. : : : : . : : : 0.o-:::::::: oii::::: O: o. O..~~~::'.O~~~~~~i ,.~~ii::! ~o.::::::~~ o.,~~~i!~ioo, ii:..:%' ~, i: , ~ !i i! o. i::::~ o..~~~~~~~o~~::i:::::::: oo., :i':!i:::': o.oo i!::.:.::'.~: o.~~!~::]::~ o o, ~::::':i~~i0o~ ~:::':'.~i:o~o. ::O.:ii.."!: oo.,.WA : : ..:'W% oo iiiii::'Oto.
.............!.m~ ~!~iiii ....... O---io .. : ....... ::~ii:~.~ ~i~:~~'oo~ ::i''.:!:: o :::ii::i o~ ''::::i~:i o.i::~~:.`:!!~!.~..~~;;i!!i:~i!!~;....i~~!~g.:~.i~...~ ~.;iiii~~i;i.;~ .!~:~i~~i:..:::. ~ ~.:::.:'.::~~'' ~ i~i~:i:i~:0o,;::Oi-:Ai;;.:..':~i% "-:: A':~~i:.::i~ oo., 'i:";:ii::io~o,,'~ ~:i:: ~o.~!~i:ii:::: o~ ii:'::!!:': oo~ .~i!~::!.:~ o~.!..:~::!!::~o o~ :WA'i!i::ie ,, ii:O: 'Aoo
i~i:iii:; ooo~ ::~ii~:~i:o.oo/.~!~'.:~::! ooo,,.~.:.i~~i~::ioo./ i;:~::i ooo ~:~~::i!: o o..,i::i:~i~ O o.W : i:!: : oo, ::i:~:! oo~./
'A.:::::: o : :: : :'. : .%:::::::: ~ : :'.::: 0 ..:.'.::: O.. -: .:::::: O..0~:.'::: 00'O:..::::~ 0 i!ii:.'. : O0'
........ : *"" ..... " " "'"'":''';''"*:''''::" ;;'':"'":'''.........::~:',::'~~',::::.:~~"':" :::::-'============= ~~:::'i!i.:: dg::~: ::::g~:::.~ :.:::::::::W:.~..'%': ~i::.. ..:::::~::::: o ~::::":~:ooo~::.::::::: o ~ ,::::.c~c o o~ :::.:.x:.:o oo~ ::~:::~[ o~~ :::::~::: o o~ ::: ::::::ooo%:.:::':::::::ooO':O!i':~!'oo~:::::::oe.:~i.:~~~ ~ ~.:~~~~!0o/ ["'iiiioo*.~.'~ii ,o~::::::i!c o, :i.ii!~oo..:~~~::o,.:':~:~:~::::: oo~, :::::::::::: .o% :::: ::..::oo.,:::::::: .0 ,:t:::54.,,:::::: %~, i::.s7 ~!::'i!~ oo-VAi~~:~: .8
: :i.:~~:i~.~ !:~!-:!::i'.*;~..'.::::!~::~i,.b !:::,~ :~i::i~,~~.,!!:i.i:::::~.:. ~.~;~i ~!i :': !~~i.;i~!!!~~ ."'~ !~~ iii~~ :..'.~~.. '.': i ..,:::~..~.::~ .:::::::: ~e-/ ~~:::;:~, ~o% ::::.:::o.oo ::::::'::'::o.oF~ :::.:::: o*%~:O: : : : oo*/ :~::::: oo-,A : : : : . oo
:::::::: e ii~~~~% oo*~::::~iiioo~:::::::: o* ::::: ~o~ ::::::"! o. ::::::::oe,.::::::::oo~~~ii] o,K':~::::~ oo. , i .W%"!ii! ioo ~!i i :iiio Oi~~!i!?.0o~:ii.:i.::: o :''::i ::.o'e/.A::::! Oi -,, --% iiiio~~ :~::::. ~
!i~i~i~ .:...A A.:4iii~~.~;:~~~i% : i..*~~.i WA. ii..~..~ ~~ I ,: 5!!~ 3`..!!ii Om.i. ? .4!2!~!i .,. !!ii:i! ,...iA~ .i~!!~::~::~-~:::~::ii:'::ii~.;. .~.:i~~ii~:.:~::~.~ .:.:.:i::~!: . : :..:.::~~!~!: :..:;;~ *::~:~i!:~i: i;:g~~~ ::::i;:~i!::~~. ~ : :!!::ii: i~:.~~ . ~::ii~:~ iii~~: ..O:.::QE::.o.:c::::: "Q :::::.: ,o*~:::::'::: o~::~:.!i:oo~ :~io~:'::::::'ioo :::~::oo~ ::::::: .o
,::::..:::oo .:::::::: . ~*.:::::O: :W c o1 ::::::::oo*, ::!: 3:1:toA ::::'5. o% :.:iC::; o. :~:::.: 0%:'.i. O i 27':::::~!:::. ,0%:::::!: e~ :c:~:::::ooo '::::::':::oo..,::::.::~.::io~~ :!~.':~:'.~oo. i::: :i .oe/ i::i::':!i: o. :O: ::-! oo*
!!~~i}:.'. ~' ii"::::.:ii.ii~.~~~.i::~ i~~~.~-'i~i~.!:'~~'~iiiii~~~!i.:.~;;i~~!,:~~ ' '.~iiiiiii~~''~ .': ii.::.~.::..~ ~: ~ ~ ::O~':::::::::~~:. ~ :~:::::.: .(% :::::::~:: -'oA::.i::::oo :::::::::O .'::.::::: ,o/,:::::::::o. ::::::i : o .' :::Ai!::~:oo*ri~i~ii!i: ~o.~~.:!~i!~o~.~ '~~iii~:' oo., ::':'.i!. o o~ .i~~iiiio~ i!.!iii o ,, !:::i: o o :::::::o o.. :'Ai!::: oo,:..::..::: oo,:..~::~~::: ooo~ ::..::::~ o~o,,.~::::::::::o~o*. :::::::: (.00 ::i:':::.:ii ooo~ :'.i.:O:. : : oo.j : ii::."::ioIoy.~!i-:'i:':':oWo
~ .* :i iii: :.~i iii~i~~..~ ..~ .' ~i..~!i i~! ~''p~'i ~ !~:.' .'.i!~~i' ~ ;~~!..~~ ~i~i~~"v;~~i!~i~i,-:.:. ;~'.~ !ii~~ ~i;~' :~'~ ;!i :.' O ~~:~ ~ ::~~i% : :On*pi:::":'i:':::ooo~ ::::.!: ~ ~!.:!iii::o o~.:.::i~ii::~ ~o.,, i:'.~~~:~i oo~ :.:i.::~::o..,. .:i~:i~: : . ..o.. ..::..........."~..:~~s~.:.:::::: ,o.O.::%::: o.:::::0~:~oo :::::::oo~ :::.:::::0oo ::!:'::::o~ ::::.::-o : : : : ' : : : : o~~O:in: ~oi.'.'!ii~~i oo*~:::!;~i~:o o. ::::::~o~o,,..~:::~i!!to.. ::::::~i ~o,!!:~::i!i oo*~~;:iii~:oooK::ii~:''::Oo, !!::)--io,
:::::::::.W ~,:::.:::: 0Oo-% : :::::.:, X o ::::::: ooo* ::.,W":i oo. -:::A:oo~i~:: !~ ~o~~iii: ~o~:~:i~~~ o*,:::::,::::oo~ .:::::::::o.oo :::::::::::oo*~~::::::.:: o o.~:::::::::: o o*~:::::::::: oo~::%.'.::';::: 0o ::::::.:.....:.:...."~: 0o:~~ii'.:i~~ o !:0. ::? -o* A:i'i:i o O:: ..::ooA::'. :i!0: o,::i,..~:: o.~::::~]iiio'o iAi.:'.:~oo~i:i~~~:: o
,:. . . ::: o .ooy, ::::::::oo/ ::::::::o~~:::: ,o ..O: .:oo% O::~:: oo.'A O::::: o, ':.:::: .o.~ ::.O :i -o.%
::::::::: :::::::: *, :4:::::.0o% :::::::::o o :q::'::::: o%:::::::.:: o~::::::'.::o %:::;::::oo./ i.:niii:oo/~::::::::oo*,,:::::::::o o ::~'':'~~ ~o.; ~~::~~.i ~o, ~::':::: ~::i~i~::oo.,i!:..:':! 'X..::::"!!o o.:X:::,i~~ o:-~~~:ii:oo. :i::!i..'0:: -00% IM':I'i .. Ai o o -i..Ai''~o ~i~~~:oo.,!i..iioo,,!....i~i ~ ::::.:ioo~ !ii.'!!~oo:.:.:.:.:::::::: o..o~ ~ ~ ..'::::::oo/ . O::::i::: 0o.: : :::::: o... ::::::::oo 0.:...::::.'oA:::::::: oM. : ..:: oo/ :iW% ~ J.
~ii:.'A .:.."iAi ik~~~~~i:..i~;i iii! '::; ':O,! ..-'i. %~ Oi~.::.:~.iii!iiii % 'A. ' i...i;i'Ai O~~~~:~ii~i~~:.::'i :i!;O .'~~%~~:*:~:~~:::::::':::::: ':~':i;.':i.% ./.O :.:!: ..-:::: o;,:::::::::oo%:::::::;:...::::::::.o./ :::::::i o . A::~::ii o~::i~::i:~o.::::.,:~::~o ::::::: o , i.:::~i! o.,~!i'':~::i o.,::~i~~::: o.~:ii'::'::::o~,:::~~~~~ o. ~~.:i~i:'Roo~ii.:!!* ~,~:'.~iii ~ .:'~ii! o' :!~iii:: oo-~:.:~:~!.''i o~i!::~i:i:to. !?'i::::! oo ii:!Xi::o o :::O i~.:oo, :::~~ oo,
i:~i::'i:~~:o. .:::..~::: o~o~::i~~i~~i..: .?~.:i~~ii~i~i o *~:i::~.:..i.~ oo. ii:!.:'i':: ~.~i~~ii:~~:,~oo.,, ~::i i.ii oeA Oiii.:'oo:! :!::: ...:. :::::::0.0 ~~~.::.~~~.'.~!i !::::.*:.~;::::::~:i.:i~.~~:::::::%~~'"~~~i!~!ii!'~['':::':: iii~~.:...::.iii:~i~'~~:~:i:~:: oo. i:~i~::':':.: ~~.~!y.~.i!~.~.`.~i:~!:!:.~.~.~`~.:!:..~ii.~3~.`.:i~.~i~.~~i/~:!~..~:~.:i.".. . : !:;O: :.A
:i~~i:!i::':~~.%:i O Oo :WA:.:::oo~:::'::: ~o..:'.:::::: o~!~i~i ,, :.~~~:oo !.:.::oo !:'~:..:oo,,..::.':: o.,::i::¢~::~: ~~~ ~~~~ ~o- O..~ !:::~::~ooo,. .i::::! .~~::::':W:: ooA:: !['.. o..~i~~:::: oo~ : :%i! : : !oo0 :: -:::'A..'~!:i~:.' o.
·.'.' ..%'.' :-::.:: .:: .., .:::. ..A.......... O.%~~~~~~~~~~~~~:::::::: .,aA "::::::::O ~':::::::' .
96The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Ap
pendix 10
Geogrphic Concenrtions -1996
Ad ~ii " ~ %oO~t U.r %.0S %.t %o H~ A' *~~ ~~ · ·# MIA NAMZ !! TI
0 be, .' ~0. L . 00% ..%. 07 .*.:.~* ......... 00 . O ... 0...0........0..0......00.....000....2 Abd.. TX 00% 00 I00% 00 0* 00 000% 00%K0 00O AkoooOOO ~I~s" 120 .4... 000 .. . P 000% 000% 000 000% 000% 4.O 000%~O 000%W OO 0.00%
1~U~··R. 0.00)( ~I~ asIY : 000% 00% 0 00% 000%( A i~ 000%( 0 0.00·1.. W*~S; O.*1*O~ ~W ~~oo
7 A0~o,- m.,o.PA .. ::::.::::: 0 .00* ::.':::::::::.::..: 000 ..::::: 0.000 00'~ 000% , 000, . 000% : .000 AkooooPA ooo% -'** H 1 b. W -. 000% 000 · .. 000* i§ 000 000 <. 0% 00%
A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nuillo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oo.I Al o 10 0% . . . 0 000 .00 oo..02 Aolratoo*1. * 000 000%e00 000% 0M00% 000* . ..0 % .0 % 00
170 Auo,tO.l ke OAS .*l:::::: o :.:.:.:.~:~: 0.% 000* :.:.::::::::: 0.00 : :::::::: 0.00% : ::::::: 0.00' *: : :::::: 0.00% *:.:.:::::: 0.70% :::::::::::::::: 0.00% ::::::::::'.::: 0.00% :.:.:::::0:::I -IS.......*¶PA00 *0oi.C0
7.Co.0.0oy0 .o 000% 0.00% ~~ 00% 000 000 .~ 000%5~i ~ 000* 000% 000%~ 000M.ooo
07 A.ho.lkoo0-C w oo 00% 0% ' . WY 000 .00* 000 000% j 000%u 0 . 40 020 000%1 000%
~ . ,t.~,~c~ ~ ::::::o ?.~!~: ii : ..~.:::::::::::: ::::*:: o.~ :::::i:~::: .~~:::::::oo~:!M::io.. :':.~::~~:::::'::~o i!i::i o.1 ..00%* 10 ..A 00. 0%00 e..m.o.,oIO 00% .*' 000% . 000% 'I1 000% m 200% 000% . 000* *'40+~* 022% ~ 000% o.." . eQ 000%Ol qooO -hlo.Yooo00OklOA 00%III,% .. % ...... 00022 0.000000go0A 00%~:~:~~:t:· · M 000%.000% · 000. 00. 0%. 00% . . 00% 000% 000%22000~o0.00*t00TX.. o0%.'.oo%..~~ 000.wx . 0*l 00....W 0% 0% . 00. 00
I, Uli- M. *A AWA*4A. 4 DA. -27 Auyl~b~ltanOA-[..: o.o : o. oo~ oo~ : ooo: o.. i: o. 000% .~ 000%:.'0o. ii'ii00 o0% 0 0%:!: 00B.-P.. A. TX Iu iiii -.'A A.cW o~c ~ po~r 1.7'
26 BmWa., MT Zr~f.000*6· m ~ ~ Wu .000%~.
20 .. 0 %000% *.:::% :::::.0% .:% .: : 000 : ' 00% :000% !::*0:
22 BI-00- AoooL0000Lo-ooo00 .. . -n00 000% b 0%-20 . 0% . 0 0.20 00% 00
?! almalbl.·UuwuUI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,, , ~~~~~~~~:~~~:~~~~~~~:··0ap·~~~~~M.;::: o*O D, :22.b..o......ii:ooo~ .':i: o .oo.: o.o-l :i:o..::oC oo.:0% o 00%.~2 oo% :.i. o 0 :::: 0. .0:.20 0o.~0.0{*Io~~.0o~ooSoT 00%~A 00% 00% .. 00% . 00% . 00 . 000% .. 000%~ii~ . . 0.00% 00M. o. o
2 otonqgftu-ooIooTX 000% o 00 .. '..' 000% : ...'..:':. 00%o .'.'.:0% o00 000%. 0. 0% o 00.:0~~~~~~~~~~~~~o.20 OoO.Oo0*oooooilOO 0000 00D. .1; 00% :'o~ 00% 00 . 00 0 . 00 . 0* .00
Bda,.~- ~,~,., TX ~t -.04~Uod·Q~L~po~-Puu~S 024%r ow 00030 .~ 000% 00 . 000%. 000% . 000% . 000 ... . 000% ...... 0
3, .II 5.. TX ...~(.*A0 b..A .* ~ 4~~ AoA *O i~cOodoroo o . 00..~.00 0%..."I.o ..000%".Y ~ii..:..000% .*OPOL .!i::':i hokf:o::: 00.o. 000%:::: : 000% oooo% ::]:iA00i 00o* : .~ :i: ~-.. ,e " 000% 0Y -'% .0
0 C - i. : 000% : : 10% : : : : ~ 0.0% : 000% : 000% .: 000%. 000% ..' .2% 000% 0::.
4 CiooOSY .000 C.S0I00% ~ 0% 00 0% A 00 0%. ...* 00 ..*.A 0% 0% ~ 00. ,: ,, C : : : ~!~:i. ... o~~:~;~~~ .?..K..-.::ii::: .?°.:?:::?::~,~.!~~!!ii&' -'J?:~~~! II.. -?i:iA~ oIo I : i?:i~o o :.!:: -A~ :::::~! o
01 C.o l SoobjC 0'...'A 000% 171A i 0 00 000Cobooobo,0*.*2. 000% - 000% 000.% 000* . 000% 000% ... .<.. 000% .... :... 000/ . . 00W2 HC10.oo0172% 4 0% 000% 4 00% 0200* 000% 000% I .092% 000% 000%
4..O.SoosF .*T 0 0% 00% 00 .... 0003 >)./.i . 00R ....29%..00. 00 0
00M -- 0 .opo.l. h L OA0 0..- A .00% '00 M0% * ~ 00 0% ~ 00 . .00 . 0* 00
00 Dr~o.Spdzr,.l* 00H0 ... 000% 000% 00% . 0 . 00.% 00%.A 0% 00 . 0
aMW I~~~~W ' k .W 4A 4*iO....A X AWA .... bI.
020010 ...h. IN% ~. .. 0%.'A 0% 0% 1..0..% 00..* 0%'. .02% / ... 00. . 0C17 c,~o U. a~~~F~~~n~~~m~~~T·:ss ·~~~~~~~~s·:·~~~~~·:·:·~~~~~~~·:.::::S::~~~~~~~~~~~:t: .:. ~~~~~~~~~~ o~~~~ooo.,
71 Vlw~n~rftd~ll a g *4*10.ff' 4 . . W .4 1010W.0. .aKk.o.oe.:... 00 ....... o0. 00::: : .OI o.o .':: 0. :0: o0-0o.%A 0 0I::0007000.9*~~rr 0020 .* 000 ..0%.00.000. .'00%.0000019 Eo0IPP--O.o~.0.Y00 .4. 0% 00 000 .. 002* . 00 000%i~i~::i~ A P 000% 5 000* 0%13 F---. SC 11-A ~ ~ O.OY 0.~1 0.11
st CyotumhO sc :.:.:,:..:.:. v '~ ...;... .. :.:.:..:. %..:..;..;0 ...... :..:. .:.:.:.:.:.1.: :..:.:.:.:.:.: ::... . .. .... :. .~~0%.........
7u-:..:...:::..:.00:::.::.':::::% ...' 0 .0. 0.0.: 020 .0' 0.%729Po.oooSC L... n*550%*..A * 000% 000%II.W 0 . ..0 . .0 . 9 000%74*P. w .d. 00% MA 06 ... 000% .. .03 '.00030 . 000% 00%A -* 0220* 000* . . 003A, - . oor : :::... .. : . oo.. .0
70 . d BoOAo..&o F 50-% . . '0A**/ 00% 02 . 0% 00 . ,0% .4$ 00% 00% 0
701 0'0sO1 *.K 00 ....-... 000% . ..000* 000% 02*/ .... A . 00% . 0% 0* 0%5, z~,,,~ ~ii::::::::~:: o co.~ :i: o.ooi :::::::~: : ::
0020*~::! .68~ [::~''i0.00% ...:::i:: 000% .'....::~!i 000%*~::. ::000% .i~~:::::: 000% :::::::: 0,00%Y :::[q:: 000%, :::':::: o00, : :::':: 0,00%D o~~~~iol~~~~~itl~~~~ o~~~e poa ~~~~~~Coa~~~ oo % '::''.:'~ ~ :!:.
::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::A::::::::::::::: 9o.00 oW ::::4::: Ao.AW :::::: ::::::II~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o :.3::::>::: o. oo.~ :::::::: o.oo~::::~::: o.o oo. ::::.00 : O( o.~ ::::(::: .o.~ :::::::: o ::~:~:: o.OO~
ni~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[
00 PoOlooO~ol 000% 4 224% 470 0 * ~ 000%: 0 00% o .0 o.. 290% : 000% 020* ~ . 0702:.:::CA-: NC0%:: 000: i./ ..20*::: ... 4..0% . 00% ." -. :
800o~~oooo/O~~oOOO 000% **~~***4*~~ ~ *~~:'". ooo~~o ....... 555/0 . 000% . 00030 ..~~~~<. 000% .'~~A'' 000% ~~.00..%.0020*71 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ri Iq:g:l,~ AZ.UT ::~: w
-..o0900 ~ ~ '.S.C .2 ..44W5 . 441* A~~~ OX $ b~ .40o* 449%.. *.4.4.oo 44W~ 004W04 0.oyON ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000% O·~ 000%u :~:.2 000. 000* . 000 . 000 .*.*..i.' 000%1::~~ . 000%. .0::~: 0. .000%·:~t~~~ W
07.NCO.9C00 . 00 . 020 . " 00% 02* 000 .. 00 0%.*'. 0% 00
80 00000F0000500.0.04 000% ~~~~~~~ 000% ~~~...".. 000% 000% . . 0.00* . 0. *. .000% . 000% ~~~~~~~~~~' . 000% . .0.00%:I., *, -o~.O .. O o.oo42- 0%0 .%67 DllmllKI 1.61* 0.00·* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o~~acu g~~~~M1
91 Oooooobooo.S0/o.Ooo.Slofo.0509o9*0 . 0020* 4.00% 00 00 O.% 0
90 00000000.OpoO00bq.*oII0 000%'A. 000% 0 00 0.020% 00%1 5; ..... 000 '.. .000% . .t10\ 024% 000% 000%
.IL ..'.,........' 0 %. '.A. X ...... 000.- 0020* 0003094~t~ f~t~lC~UL'·L::: o.oo. ::::o o.;ooo. : : : : :: o.oo0 *:::?::.~! o. o. : :.::: o0%. 0 : i:: o00.. : i000%
. 00030 ~::..:. 0003 ::.~::~: 000* . 000% *:~' 000%~'~: 000% 00% ': 0030 .....'....... 00% : 0020'i; auaulo~ra ~ I*2 ;·(1· 014JAY 00* .D~y ~ 10.o4%4..100$ AWA *309004 5000001 01094
*L 06.. -A .002 OBoO.00*1 000%, A:::::::··:; 0.20D02*.... 0% ' " 0 ~ * 000* :5. 000% .~:t. .. 000% ~i 000%~ 0020*007?J9~oooo F r [.'..0%o:'::.'::.:.>. 0%:::::: a,:::~:.:::::.:: : o .9. 2::::::2::%:: oo2. :::::%::.:.D .0
001 Joyo.OoIA.000%~5 :::O33A 0D~. 02* 00% ''~00 ~i'i"' 000%. 000 .... 500.. .000% . 000%
.900 1 .o iOOC2600%100 :1100: 04 *'*10* 0030 003 . 00 ...A009..i: ~ 002%~: ..1010:10../ 099 ...7 0% 000
00 ooO0O 00 4: 0% :: 000% ~....... 000% . 000* . 000% 000 A5 020* ..~5 000% 000%007~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ko- ~~i~~ii~o.ool 000 00 3. 0% . 0%m00 .". 00 . 0% 4 00 00 000%
I0 L-0*y.00. 4.000%.. S.0.9. 7.4777070 2.A.0593 :*:. 000%:W ~ )c~ n~:: P· ::ff~ ~ .06···~;·;.·: 00
I) Wld9AL O~A11~.:OW .WU 00% . 00% 0 00* *..**. 7.* 0% ' 00 D. 00030. 000%*:551500. ':: :." 10. '- :!. . ... "*. 3X.'"':o
020 LOoooPA.000%w *I: 0.00%:~ ::3::3: 0020· 000.000.) 000% 000%.000%.u"000%1. 000*~[~.1(:...~..~ii!i~~!ii?~?l.~lM)ii~i[I:::::~:: o~oo~ :.'i: , :i?.~: 7.~:::'k.i o.. :::::: o~ .:?i: o . ~: ,,.~i '::",.F~::":: ".'~::~:~::~'~: Osl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .· Fefi qaxtb-Ad~~~ugt~ T~
e~ amIaarp~.,,..~.,,nema~,a ooo ...oo .w )g .W· ooo' .w ....... ooo~. .. ooo',
~::::'.~:~~~ ~~~~~~ .~u ib':42..:"::::: o. ::::::ooV::::::::::::o :~::~:::::::::: ooo :::::::: %....
,2 a,,.,Cf :.'.: ::::: , .WY :::::~::: o. ::::~i:!: o.~ l ::.'.':i.'.":!.'? : ~ o.~. ::::::.::o~~i~!::::::o~ ::::i: o.~Y :! :' ... .::: ,.~ i?!i~i .oo00*:~!:~ ~
,e1 ,~,,~ s : ~:~i~~ ,oo ~?::~i: o·~oo !:::~:: o oo. i!::~! oo :::.!;I~! o.oo :::iM~ o.oa.~ ?:~.i: ~:!: o ¢i::~; o ~ !'::~::! o. oo.~ ?::::?i~ .oa
zo3~~~~~ ~ h~.oo o.oo% :~:. : : : i::''::~:oo~.::~:::o~::::~71, ::¥::':0D' ''::::: c' ::::::::'0~ ::::''~ w~~:.~~: 2~::'''".:o ".::: .0
:~;`.~~.~ ;ii;!!~;;!?;!;??iii~?~~~ii:;;;!~~i~i?:::i!~ ~o :!iii:'.~: .. :?:~!:~ ~,~;~~~iiii: ~o~ ~~:.?ii~? .o,~';ii::a: o,, i'*~;ii:...,:i:::~?~..o,:::.:::ioo, i ~?:iio10 , eveW. : : : : : 2::000, :".~*:: 9', :::':::::oo ::.: 22, :::::~: o' :'~::::': oe :::::::: 0,~ :'1~:23 ::'i *: 00~::;::!':00,~o,~,. j,.-~,, ~c o
'~~i~:'ii . ::~:::::.:!o~ !::::~~L o~ ::?~~:::: o~ :::.::-: ~%::.:.:::: ., ::::~:::oo~ :~4::::: ~~ ~:::::: o%:::~:::: .....;..,u~. .................. ...:~~~:ii.o..~.~:i.:::~....~..!~~...... ~i~>.:!:: ,~~ i~"~ ~ ~,~ .~:.':...:o.~~~:::~~:!o~ ::!i::¢o. !!:::. ~: ~ >.::!.:i!'..o:i!i.";::~~~:::"'::!*~ ~::::~::::.* !~:::::~~. !!i:~~:ii!~~ !i~M!::: i~~:::iii .j!!'':i!:~~i:~:.~~!~ ?.:~~: 'i~' :.i!iii~~~ii!'"~ 'i:.'. ~ k.~'.a~~~-.~&'.::~~~:::;..::. ::%:~:~ ~':~::j: .~::::::.':~ . :".';.'-!~~- .~..:i~:~.>~ . ::'~:: ..~:::.:"~~!:3::'.~>.: o !:~'.:::: ~~ ~:i·."~~.'
tll Jo~~~~~~m~~tc~~~n PAoom m~.~,c~ , ~'~i::' ,~~::::[: o~ ~!~::::! .o% :::!!: oo. :.:?:!:o~ :::::~! oo. :::: oo, ?'.!;~!?: o~~i~..:~! o ?'::-ii[''o
97The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendlx 10Geographi Concentrlaon -1996
... 2·".~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.L---*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: TX dd'-
137 M...d OH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .s # 0004 NAMIOO T.OoJ T.Oi i3~040. 1.0.0 ~*N 1.00 *::*~:: 1.00 1Tmtl 1.0.0 0l±~ 1.0.0 1.00 *4k 1.0.0 6 1.0M-
,, v:..00.K 00.4 00 .2....~. 00 ~ " 00 .0.4 o 04 ~ 04% .00 ...'..*.'00100L.dAbm, : '':::::0O* '''~'''OO'( ::::::: 0.00 :00::%:::: 0.' ::::::.4.: .O%:.~:::: : 000%:: : : : : : 0 O*:::::::: 000% ..':: 0.00% t:.:.':::::::
.OO,~,'600~~~~~~~00'... .."'0%.... o%
Ml~I~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ I:i!i~]~~ o4.00.ooA. .:::00: : ~,~ 000%:::::i o ~o .':0:-.0%:: o::.'.':i::.:". 000% ''~i~~::~ , o 0::00% : i: o.o00. :.'*0: i:0 027% ::.:i! 0.oo% :i 000i.0i
02 0.o,4OmK-00 *':.::"":: 0.0o% >.!:.:: 000% ~~:::~: o o o 000% i~!! 000 0i~~~i .00%'! 000 ''~i~<.':i oo4% ~..4:*4.. 06,. 0% i~ .......i~ : o, :.::.:: 000~ : .".0:!~o023 Lobbo
'
0'
TX 00%~i!00%:~:* 0%.".'... 000% !:..& - ~: 0.0 000% :!::!:...' o. :::::::o.o ::::.::o000% ~.::: ~~ ~::~:. .o . ::::...' 0~F !.4 k:.. 000 oe i~.:000%ii o,,34 ~.~..~ V . . E~:*.:!:io ~ q.!iti!;.000% :.....:.:!!: 000% ! .o, . . ' .::'"'.::~:! :. 0.00%.! :.!. . '.. 0.00%.o '...!.:..:..!: .. ,.......0.'0!!:!.o. .:.,:.i:!::!...'!:.o,0...::%:..:. i:.:...,.. . a:.. ' !0...0% .
13~~ Mmidd OHWx'
dd'A .. ooa
-.W. TN 2-.1-A 'A~~~~~~.W* ~ m ··............. 4*70. .12400000000000~ ~ . . t':::::::: 00% ..~:.~ o00~: :.... 000%: :.000oF%: .:: .. 000%. .0: .00 %:::::oo :./2.~.::.00 000% :.:.:::oc ~::::i 00 . %
141 I-c CT02.0o0o.AoO...o...0::i1 ik:i : 000%! ~:..`0% ..i:. : :..::0::%. . :%.0 :::V. '00. 2: 000 22 ::0::::::.~ .o ii::i: : 000 ::~':~:' 0.00..iigii ~.'Xi~i o% i'..00::0% oo :S::!:io o~ :..:::iiii oo,,],,,-,,.o 004 00 0%. .. 00. 0%. .~ .00l:i~i::°°% ::::::2::: 0~a:.00% o~W* 020%.:!:i. 0.0..0:!::%i A~.::ii~ : 000%:i!:.~L°. ~~~~:'.'..°...!:Iii..:.,.~ ~.i:~ o
N146..~~~00 . 00 . 0 00i 0.0'04 o ,,A 00 .'.'- 00 % :.: o00% :.!!2 0 o....*': 00:% :."A.. o -...".: 0%
_X 2" .042 l,oO' [~['.'ii: 0oF% .~i:A2 000% i::::!:.::i. 0oo% ~..::!.'.::i: ~" o00% ""i:i: : 0 .00% !i.0::0:!% o~4± 0o74 . 000%:~~i oo ::i'io ::ii::ooF::::.. ',i 00040420041.010o~~o.0,.0o40~ 0% 4.. 00 .... ~ 00%.*~2 00% 00% ~ 00 2X~: 00 . 55 n
~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .2044 001..oO~~o~oo~~o.M%0 00% .... *... 000% . 000% . 0 0~~~~'~' 0000 0.00% X~~2~ 0.00% 'A~~' 000% . . 000%.......
.4ooW 4 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o 1 .0.0%.. IL0 ...00% ........: 0.00A:i:!: 000 :o::% :. 000%
052 ,,~,.,['...FO.i o~ 00-0%~ . ~ .. '.i:.- ' iii:oo.~ !.t.~ 000,. 00'0%. 000. .. 000% .:.%''. 0~ .0% ii~~ o ~ 0.0. '!% .. '....000% ~i~o. 00 ...t. 0"0/
0 ...PA '' " 0 0 ..... .
020 04oLo..Ooo.00.oo ~ ~ ~?:iiS:~ ooo.CT 00% . 00% . 006 . 000 o..."~ 00%...'::..!::i 00% i:i:i:.:i: .. : 0.F0!0:!!!: ~: o% ii:::::':oF ::::."::A:i : 02o% :ii.:..8: .'. 0:0:0%i~~ o .o ~:!!:.' 05 P. cO LA -' % -'
053 O~,.,o0::::::::: 0% 4:::::: A.00% :..::::.:::. 000. 000% :i~i4::: 240%~ 0': .00.ii % :i :i:':00% "'i 000%~ ~:000% :'.'./ .o.~ ~:~:.:::o0 !~~''!'<:000% ::~:::0Ag..0..4 . . . . . . . . . ..... 00....l:.!:::.::i7:l.ooF!.~! : . 0W::' . .0....::::..:..o'. 000%::: :': .o. .::.!::$.!..':...oF .'.8:<::......?00%.: i::i 00`!:.. ' . 000.`.$ : 4 . .000%?.i :i..i`'.:i..~ ~ .`. 000%,`::
oooooo-N. ....... 0% .
140~~~~~~~ 0.0.4C 00''A 0%. .. 00 .01.00 1 00 $ 4% :100%..A 05 . :02% 00lOo,,4.FL ]00%.:i.i0i 25.0oo% .i44!..'i 11. 000 0.:':::0! o% :::::::;:: 3.0o% :!:."':: 2.00%'?::::~ o~::~::::::oo :::.'$,. 000%:i!::~" .o.':!.'.':~ 00oo%00000,b00.1Y .'...'.'.'. 0007i!:.:::::::.': : o 00o% . 0:::: ::: o o000 .:....::::: °0o% :::.ii:osd::':::.: 0o00% :::~.'..'%::::::::o 0004 :::::..t$~: 000 :::~: a .~ ::::::: 000%
Id. 'A~~~~W -AA~ ~ .~40 AA*
M7 0.. NC406A 0 ."A .".0% .'. 0% . 00 A10 ~ .0/ '$2 .0 0% :00 *"* 00
A.... -. ~..4 .~ 40~~A4 J0 .0W. 0 0.% ,,: ....0l710ooo.P0 ""'~~~~~~~~~ii:':ii:00% A'!~!!!! 000% :."...i::00% ~:Mi! ::.0 .',,';.'oo~:.:; : ;io. o !00%i~ o. ii.':0.0 : . ,,i..2.ii o0o00~.. 0!!!0% . '000""""0
170 0.010.400 ~h A ~o44A ~ o~o0A sm ~-'A WA .-.. A005 0%.0/..Co't0 I~~:..*'".'i 0.0% !:2::';:. 9 000*0 ~ ! o/ . i2*2"" : 00 . 4400% :*.'..'.:: 0.0% :ii'..: ?.00% ~:.':: 0.oo% :'..':: 000% 00:0%~:'.: .040:::0i .o %0,4 1oiAE0401:'.::::::o.00010 : .0 3. 1.. 00 ::::.': o0o% :::"i.".-: 3307% ":::.'2::"" 0007. .':.'.:::: 000. ::I ':: 1.1% ::} .: 231% :::::::': o0oo% :: .: 000%
100 0~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~].....!:i::!~:!:..o , . . 2. 000%iili .~~.iia:.a.....~`.:..:..iii.?.iii~a ~....`.. 12i3:. :000/ a.'0.00% :.ji: .2% ...:i000.:.% 000% 000%~i.~ iii:~L.~
107 0010010~~~~~~~~~~~~i..K:0.:bOi00i: o'oA 00% ~~ 0.0:0% ::::::.00006 . ::::.000%::..'::! oo- ::::::::oo :::i::ooo..:::::.. . 000/ :.:'. : ::::.,'::0.oo.".::00::::::::0'...0000000.00 Pu:A.22o 0.0 '.'4'..'.'.' ~ ' 0::0:'': : % :'':.'.'. 2: :'' :' :': :.''.'::'00 ::": 0.0 ' : 015% :':'"': 00''::::' 0%::::'' 000%
15 00,-.hT i!.::::Y 00% ~:.~ : 0.S%*":':***000% .:.1',.' 04 .. :.:'. 000% ". ''*:. 000% ."":.:*.... 000% :..:.. 000O% : .::C.: 00006. . .. :"' 000%....:1::002 OookyO~~~~~~~oooO 04 : : : . ' ¥ .00'% ¢:':1A:i::: 0.0 O :::.::::: 000% . 00 0.WAC::: 0.::00 % ::~:::::::: 0%:::::::: 0 .00 % . 0:::::qO%:::::::: 00% . 0:::::::0:0% :.::.: 000%
17~ t~Usb-tA PA103 000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~*..%'.''.' .0 '.....' .2'.'..'.'.0. .*..... 000% .'.'.A.' 10· ... .$: 0....4.... .'0.*': . 004. '..... 00%..4....00.......0.0
1945 I0000 LWA 0.A222 000% '~'2..... 0057. . 0007. '.2""'*""' 0007. O.'.'.'.':::: 0001.% ::::::~:::: 0.00% . 000% . 000% . 0090 0000.00.0.0000040001 .00% 11[:o02:::: 34%:~:::" 0% "6' o.0 "'o"4"2 :::W:i:0:::: 4.00% :::::::: 0.00% "":::::::::" 002 :::::::°0%::..:.:::°o%:::%::: o% :::::::::oo' :::%:::oo ::::%:o.000%
.97l.407o.~. s[ .:.:?:' .o .~:~.!:: o 'o'2'"" 000:! : '.4 '::.:. 070% oo3* 041/.~:: : o0 427% 00% :. o.o 02..: .4... :'.::. 000: : :%201 0.O~o.0.0.r~o...PX 00% ~ 0500% 0:0: . 0:::::::":"o~o 0:::::':.":::: 0.00% :::~::::::::::: 0o% :::~~::: o~::~¢::: ,o. :::::::00o%~ :::::::: 9../ '.::""::: 0.0.0% :."'.'::::oo .!.'i °.0%202 lSo000-000 00~?:~":' % "..::':ii: ~:'.::::ii .o !::i: o% : i!'i .o 00 : :!0i::o.% '.i . 00006.o/ ::i::::::~ 000%. :i~::2:i:::2:: 0%00. 0oF,% ? ..::.. .00
A N= ....- d~~..00~.'...'~E~:*i~. 703...444200 T.1..'O 00 . % ----- ---. '..'!'..: 0% !i"'.'.'i o00 !:::o::::::: 0 % 0% 000%
.102]i2i l-Du4.lm.?:.~d.:!..N~............Az.v.l:i::.:: .°..%.. : : A::..A02: ::::!:::. O.O%:4.OA.::..... &!::::::.:::.0*0,::::" : !:::::4....::::::":" : .OO :':..:::4"30/,:::::::::Id%°.0%:::::::'::: 0002057.0.04440. ."~~~~~~~~i!i:.'.'i:!oo ;[.:'g:."OW. ,oo0% . 0.04 . .0 . 006 :::::i o oo ::::.:i:i.3:::i:::i:i:: 0.00% '~!iiiii~ .0 ::.0:4 ', ::.:i: 000%:i!::. ::00% """~:i~'22ii ooW""a:::. 00oo% .c:::c::oo4 :::aooi..iiiiii 00% o 0% 0.~~"' 0 """:i:i:ii:: 0.00% ::::::::i:ii 0.00% .":i'::: o o *:i,.4ii... 014% !. 000%i'. oo i::.'.:: 0:
.. ..xW
202U 00 A" ".A""" 00%"% 2'00%' - 2A 000-...'" .6""2:000A:22: .0 "*~ 0% ' 0%..."~''00
211 40. d.0,00 00."." 0%"".. 00 . W ""A '00 ''1 .0 : ~ 00%"'0" 7% ""'" 0% ." .00:* 0W. A .A* **. 0.........*. .!!!..,.::.'i!r:...o.,.J:i04MiL °%
44:¥::....i::::::*! ... ::*;:::!~ * ** '200 ......
191~~~~~~~~~~ O-c~J K N222 TopokoKS 00% A 000% 40302..F:2036 . 000%: :"o"""% 0:0% ".."..: 0.00% i~I:~!: ~ !!}.':.$~t ~o ~i2.''i:i 0.00% 000.%iiiio0~ liilii.'.ioo. i'iiiii o~ .'.:".iii °00% !~ii~i.t oooWA.' "'5*0'.- 403%, ""iiiii .~ ~~i'ii"' o00. iiii.;:0 ~ "!""'] : . . .0:i: ,2o4% .'000i.(: o,% 0007~!!:ooo~.'X~!:: ~, :~~ii: ~, .'!:':: ~Y.W.,"'""""'. 0*.....20%.237~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::: 5oo0% :...:0$:::: oor% :::::.:o A.."''. .:.:%::::oi :::::".::::":: 000% .'':::"'::: 00% o000% '2::::::::: 0.00% :::::::: : 0.0% 0::%::::o000.' ""'::::::: 0..%
1900tkayOo lu T :,C:::::: 000. 00 00 ::...s:: 000. 00006 :::: :.':::: 0.00% :::*[l::::: 0.35% '::::::::: 0.00% 0::00t:::4B' ':*:::::0O% :i' '4:: 1 .0 * ::::::1'02% ': :::::: 000%
~~~~~~~~~~WA A ** 4i. 130*........," ..'.~. ?:....!.a'...024. i.:'.i.... :.:.~. ~oo%~: .:..: 04::-,% $,k:1:A:2:i .... ~.~~ ~ ... ii2*0.ooF6a:. :.*'!3o,:
M 198Sm 11~ CA
221 0.ol.C.0.VA.' ""02'.'.' 0004 4 00% ." 0006 '.. % ." 25 00% """. 0% 2. -, -:M -.. . 000~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~I:.ii o...'.""'00%:""A"" 0oo% :"""'::.." 0007. '.'.'::!::o7 ::..i': :o'~ !.'.' 00 "~"" 0 . . ..~ :::::~ . !i. . ~... 0.0:!4:~ o.oo. ~ :0 !::%:i::':.o00o
233 SYtmILC A 4. i~!:! 00/. 000% ''i."...'.i ~ 0o0 '.'.'~."""."iiio 00i::! o .''.'.'.'.:~:!:!:!..: 0.0/.~ .."~~iii~ o ~i!iiiio i."...:.! 0000. . 000!!'!i~ oo% .'':''...i 00oo%[i'::'':0007. "',::::, 000% :::::: . 00 ::: "' ::.y': ' 4*:: °.0 : : : : : : : :000% :.:",':,:: 0OO% : ' : ' :I. 000 : * : ' 0.000 ' : ':':*:':',00'. . 00% , : ':::,:,",! OW . . 000%~
~:~.' :~:~ ~ ~'.''..''.A,..''..'' ":!1.'.'i! a~::~a. ``0?:'A`' ̀:a"i4:00a0:* :: A *a0::: ` : o:[ a 4aa02*?0"24Y4OoCA W5tVL'm'"0 """"00% . 00 00% .0 /'"'"'.00% A 0..5..0%'"".0
0.0.041.0.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [:::::::: ° , 00% ~:~::: 00~/ :::::::: 0.0004 ::::0:: 4.0S%6 ::::i:~,':: :000% ::::::. : 00.5% ::::::::::: 0000% ':::03:3': 0060."4°'/, ::0:0/. 00::: 2B.79% :::~:::
98The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 10Geographic Concentations - 96
|OO00M Th0.2 d AO. : | ,:. T T.J i .: T.0il ¢+>> T0.l ,2 T bl >.1 T-A l T OO OTA
l3OS ::: g OWS g 0 C.OOS 0 O.XOS g DOOS 0 tOOS 2 2 . g~~~O m O C..
00% 0;:: .. ' 00 ' 0 W w | > Dk :: ..... i.- . . 00
*4o~~~~~~~~O ~~~~~~~o4~~~~~~0* '~~~~~~~~~~ . ~ ~ ~ A -0% ~ 0.0 Ooo. -A00% 00 ..O000% ... .25%A
ONS.::: .. :::::: O.OO , : . O.W :: O.OD .:: . :. . ... ..... :' oo. ::0.;.0: ' oo.2.000OS% 00% | 00% g 00 04%O ..% 00 ... 00%.00.. 0
000% '...... 000% ..", ..... ... 000 0.0
:::::::..:::: o ::;.:::: D.::::: 0 o0 0 ;0 o oo 0 ; . .:..A 00.0: :. 00, .. o, 0O D S 0: : : 5 .,: eo s .ew s :;:.' . :O.CO: ' :0 . 00
:.'::::::::: o.oo, ::::::~: o.oo~ ::::::.:: o. oocs :::::: CO. o- :::::D.ODS o. !:?'.i'.>: ows.o ?; :::: o. o.gt i::::~~i otoo. i>~~i~'" 0.9^DW0.00% .. . 0.% S 00% 00 % 0 . 0n O W 00 * 02:A: :OS* ::: .' : >.'0A :::. o. o :: ::: . : :i o.os : oows :.::..:: : o ow.
::.':::::: °ws' ::..::::: o.wse' :::::::::::::: o.oo'x ::::::::::::: D.WS ::i:::::: ee;; * ::::::::: o., :::::::::::: e .OD oo~ :::i:?: go D.O i:::!::i o*.o.w
:S::::~:: os,~ : ::.B.:::: ows./. :f ::::::::: o.os~ >:*:::::::.: ooo'~ :::j::~* ooo-s D.:.:::::eosx B:!!~:~: oN ~ DWS: ~:: e.WS.~ i 8*::*i: o.oo~.0% O---' 000% ...n 0 00 000% 0. 0 0 4
::::::::;R: DWSo. ::;::;::::: o.DDS, ::. :;:::::: oeos :::::.:::::: oo.s .~:~:::::: o. o.er ::::::: : oeoo. :::..:: oooS :: ::.:: o.S !~::R:?:: ooo~
O.- O~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~. 0 .00 . 0.O.%.':?:: ooo., :::: 0. .0 00% 'oo . 000% o:: 0. ' 0::0%: i:! o. oo :!::.. : oeS . : .: o.% 000% ' oW.. 004%. 0 00% 00% ' ......0.0% 00% .0.00% O.00 . -0% ' 0
vi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. , , -'' " O ..000% 000%*:Oj 0%s O-.:: 0;:0% 0.00% O% 00
::::.:. o.. e::::g ooo .. . o : ... :.: ..: O- ::::::: o.,o :: : ooo ::::':. oo.O::::: O.~,S :::>..::: .>; O w.s O : :::::: o.L :::: o. :~: : oeoo , i :ii O.N ::: O-oo :?';.:: oN-0 ... ..00 %.0. A.O0+ %000% oo, ~: os ta*4 oo W .. ~ 000% l§"2 000%*s~ coos 000 0.0 000 000. g ' eos i' 0:2 00
::-.6:;:~ ::. oeo., ::::::.::::: ows. ,*::::::::: ooos ::::::::,:e::: oo. ~:::::::::::: oos :.::::W:~:::] ooos: *.:?:::: :i: O o. , :::::?:?:R':' ews. ::::'::::B: ooo-
r:~:::e::::::: o oos :.:::.:':::,: o.ws. eR :ows:::.':::::'ee:: o~o. ws*':::~::Y.':: ooos : .:.>X:.e::::oe s: :> o.oos :::,e::::;:::~~o / : : : . . o: ws. ;~ :,!: e:: oo .~ g?~:.: OO.BS~.04.0 | *O00 0 -% O O OW 0% °.% 0 0.0 o 0 o 000%
eZS t.- O ..A K~f~fWA%,00 '.. 0% ~ 004 ~ 00% 00 O.00% . 000- . 00000% ~ 000% ~ .00010 . 000n > .'A .::.: O70" . 00% O00% . 000. . 000: 0:: : :0:.::,'::::0::% : 00::::::::::::;: 0 :.:::::, 000% ' :.f ::::::0 %:: o000 0' 00O.00 00 .0 .00 0% O0% ..00000% . 000% 000%A 000. .000 000% .:... .0 ,0 ...'.'*.. 000%
000:I /. 000% -.. '/ :0: ', 0 : :::::::: o.ws :: :.':: o. o:::.::. w :::: ow ' :::::: oo0 ::: : o.07
.,>r',.'.:.: o .'A.:2::..: ow .:.,, ' o1oos., , : o .ew o. ows ~:~:!:!:.$:. o : .?:, ew::?:,..':::: o.oo W/ 4.eoo
.-4%OgV . .~. ' ..Om% OW,0. . .. 20.%,6,OOIe ew ,6>:, e s:Syg .ow :X..Rje OO,,,,Ijoo A*X;w,,,'ow ~;'*' w :'..'''iA, O.ws .',"' .O./.00X00 00% 0 *..,.*. 0% 00 .00% 000 00000%.: : ooo 00 ::0::%:.:: . o. 00 :0::0::::0:::0: 0: 000 :0:::::0% . .:. ::: o :::: . :::. ~ ::.::: ooos
:::':::::.i: ooos ::::::::::::: owS., :,.::::i::>:t:: ooo~, ::::.>.:.:::.q~ o.o .,::,:'..'~ o.oo; :.;:.'.::::. owo. :':.::?::>i::: owo. ::::,:::::,'.:: oos .:i:?:.'.':?:! ow.i:::::::; .o~ ?:f ?~?! .oo.~ :ii::ii~oo.~:.:g!::!::!: ooo, :.: : ::::! 0o !::b:!i : o.ws~ r,,~ii!::: .: w e; ': w :i:: :.:: : ooos: ::::'.'.::: o.o o. . .Sfs re.4004 2003% ~ii~i~.~ i~ . .......:00%....-.00%. 0 0 .0% .0%.. 00000.4 :
0:::. o .' :.:,::: 0 O.N .::,::: . ::::::: . .::0:::::::::. : ::o :oo. . %:::>:::::::::: O0%.N :00.: :::,:f,::. .oo. ::::.:::.:::::::::0:::: .0 0:00:::::::g:: 4w, :::: :::'':.:: o.ws . x!:-::R>'' o .oo'x :?:?::.' ews
. : : ':, :::: ews; .::':.: : ::::: oows :.0:::>:.:,::z ews :'S: r ;::::0:::: o0% .,0::00% . 02'.:.120 00::::0 owS :z,::::::::: ow., :::.,:::::::: o.04o.::'::::: o.oo 4:::o . :::: :o 4 :::::::::::: oo : .:: : o .
*:::::.:: o. o.,:::: ::: oo. :: o. oo' :,::::,::::;:::: o WS'/, :::3<::::::: : o. eos :::::::::..:>.: o. oos ::::::::::::& ow ,;:.r: :: o oo :::::;:::,:::fOw -r::>:,::; o. oo., :: ::>:..:: :.: OSii!?:?? oe o. i~!° ?:??i i?? 5 oo;,f, iii~ toewso ,, j i?!i:: o~ ws::::~: :: o. ooS , i~.::.:;: o wo , i ,,:~."! t o. ews:::?:?i:: o.-i- o , i???~! o. , F oo..0:0:0:0:::4:? .9oo40. :??? : : :....o~. .::??:?::Lo;:.:'.:?:?*....:.?.:?.:: .o. ::???.::*..R:.':? : o::.: ooo..:!.::i.:?i ..o. .:?::0.::: o o0,>.:{:::::S::::%:. O.OOS ::>.-::::::: O.NS .:,;. w :,:*,::eo s:::,::1::.:: o.ws ,5:!>:::,.oos':<'::.:::: o.~~~i.:i .o Lo %i:'?!':oo,:~:?.::: .::'::::?:? oo~:?i .oos??".,.:?:?:?:]:j:?:~: O.., .W o.oo., O.OO o. O.N ,:: o. oo .i:.:.: % ow oos ,,::,:,.,:e,. ows ?:!:: ows
::;::::::'R: ewso, ::: :% >::: oZoos ::: o. :::.':':!:,;: : ooos :w:::;::w::::: ew ~ !: !::..: 8 ls :'f::> ewo., ?:i:::?!::: o o. :::R::,:,::R ewso ::::i:]~:i: o.o.
::::::::::::: .oeos ::::::w* %>:::::.:.:t ows. . :':%:::::.: WL':::>-,::',,, owoo'/>,::::,>,'::::: ow :::::::::>.OOA::::::: o .> ':: .:i OowX ::::::::::: o ' :R::::::::::: Oo.S: 0 0%. s'":,>:,:%,, ows ,:! :,::.: z o o oo':: 000 ow 0.0.:::0: . ' .N :0:0::::0 ;e, .. ': o00%.00
.::^:::::::: owoo; :::::: 2.W~,L ::::::::: o. :.:.':.,: ooo,:.:::; eoos ::5 : : : : : :o .:::R.>.% .NS':,:::: s.9. , ::::':,,:'::::: ooS g.':xie ::::':.f::.:B 3. ~.eo
::::::::: . .:: i::::B ooos : : : : : o~o~.::::~?: ~o; :!.~::::o~:':.: : ::: o. ;:>:.:>:fON ;:,::..:,:.:. O.W :::;f:..,:% esa~r.:::. ows .:,:::j:;::::cw ,.::.:f:: o r:'N:,: eos~00% . 000% .... 000% .... 000% 000% ~~~~~~~~~ 000% 0.00% . 000% . 000O O.%00070 O..0% . 002%
00 O 4% *0 $ os . .%o..> t% oeos '." 00S $'i 4%
_ ~~~
::::::>.:: k ,::: ::::: ows o. : ?:.:::: o. :~::..:::~ .o, :::::': .:: owso ,:?:.:.', e sf r; o s f.:.:::.:: ooos :Re:::.:>.S O.OD' :::':.'*::: O.NS ::'.::::: O.WS
>,:?:!~:?:?:. o.ooS :!iii?!i?~ o.to, fif!if?4i§;:> oooS ., : -.".$?! o~ ii!?~:>??i?>: ows:-,: :?-,-:i > o.S i''8'i!~ o.S O.NS $.!?i.':.> ow ~!i~S~:? o%'l~A0 50000 05*~$41.*0*."~ *.~44"'I . .700% 000% 000.0. .000% ~~~~~~~~~~~ 000% 0~.0% X 00.. 000. .00%
00% "*..*.~ 000 ~ .0004 .'O 000O..% 000 00 .~.'.00 000 O*.. 0%
1~~~ -'A ...'A OWA .... A~~~~~~~~~~~~~...4~.00%N. O....'00 -A00 WA.'.' 00 .00%.... 00%*:* 0% . 0% .00 02
0070 ~ 000% ~ 0003 ...n .O' 004 . 00 0,00% O.00% 0007
003i .'.'0 .00% .% . O.4 00
004:..:: es ,::i::::: o ws .:: ., :O:: o.oo% : .o O $: o :.:: , o.oo0% " : ow ... : :: 0 '.. os00% s 000% ~ 0004 000% ..'...~.' 000% ~ 000% ~ 000%. .0004 .000 00044004 .. A O0 *4 xK' 04 0.40 044O0.
:::::::::::::: 0% 0:::4 ...O... ...% :::: 0 . ::. -0. 0..' O:% . .0%00% I "*O..0 00 0% M 00% .. O- 00 . 00 . 0% 0.. 0
::. :.0.: . . ..:4 : : .:.... 4.:*. -:..44 .::. :...:O00% 000 A 0004 000 O.. 0% O 04 00% 00 . 0.0%
004 .00 - 000 000 . 00% . 004 00 . 0 . 00
00::XX. %'O.. . 0 000 ..
--. '*4. 0---- ----- 1~ 04. 00.0....0..0.%.. .1 2% O" 000% #1 4.200- -0 O-' -00 .00% .0.- 00% . 0.. 000.% .4 0.0
040%" . 000%" 000% 000%..:**:~~~~~~:4.: 0.00.4:~~~:-::~~.: 000% 000%- O.. 00% 0000% 0~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... 00%M .. ... O.
:::::::::::: o 00. 0 0004 .':::000%::::.: 0.o0::::::::0%.oo/ :::::,::oo. :::::::: ~o~ :::::::::eo~ ::::~::::::::: 0007.~.:::::::::oo.00%' 000.0 O 00 .. O. .0% 00% O.004. 004 O0%. 000%00% 000% ~~~~~ 000% ~~~ 000% >x~~O: 0.7% 00%. 00% 0% O10 030
::::% .00% :::::::::: 00% 00::4 .... 0: : ...'A: :0: .00 .4. 0.0
00P.0 4.. 2O2. O~ K0% 003 O ..A O0% O .On 15.00 00 04 .2
00% ....~~ ~ ~~~ 00% ..,...00 1~*00 3,76: .04 .:: 0% 004.. 22 0 ..' 0.00%000% ...~..,. 390% ~ 000% . 04% -." 320 .00% ..45 5.' 0% O:.''00% 24
00O0...'00 4.. 00%O. :: .04 .% ~ * 00 2 000A '**" 00. 0.0..0tA 04000. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4.0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~04%~~~~~~~~~~~O .Q
00% .000% . 000% . 000%~ ~~...0.0.::... .:0 .K 0% ::x: .0
0 O. 00% O O00 I 00% - 00. .0 ,.:~ .04 . 0% 003
00% .00% .. 000 % 0% .00 .00% 0.0 "...00%"t .0
000%'. 00 O00%. .% .05'30 .0 00% 0% O .. O. 00 .%0 --0 ~!g. 00.4 00 0%. 000%.O- ..O.% 0.007 ...'..007 . 07
00 WA00 -4% O0%..... ..% .000% * 1.: 1 .00%::::000 . 00 . 00
4.I .00%. .. 0% . .00% O .00% O.% ~ 0.4000.0.000 ' 00 00. .0000 O..000......4:00 00.4 % O. 000.%
:::::.::::::: 000 0.: o 0 . : .': 00% :: 0. :::::::::::::: 0 .:.:. 0oo. 0.0% :i:::.": 000. R.'000, O ,%. 0 % 00.0 ::. .- ,00.4 : 0% : .00%
00070 *:.~;<:4. 0.00.4 . ... 00 000 WA .0% O 004 '' 0%-"" 00 ~~..-A .- "iX _I~~~~~~~40404 *0
-:::.:::: D.olr'A,::"':i-:::: O.OO'X :::ioosw .:.:::o.o, ::;..:;:::: .0, :::::;;:: e oos, ;:::::::: ~0 :.:;:;:::;& o.' *,'' ::L ;:::;,,,:: o. oo ;:;:~.~ ;: 40'S7 * 7 0 .% 0.3 t ... :B 000 ::.:.. ... 0.. . ...... % D - S . .. ... .0. S ... I... ..... .... .. 5.02%. 0.00
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 99
Appedi 10Geogphi Concentration -199
X.0%: 00: : -o.0. A:: :. : : : 00,. . .x.00......... oW oo07
... ..3x.x .0.4 :.. . . . . . ........t ...........00% 000W:.: .0 $~$:00 0% . ~ 00%:S$ .0 0% 0004
0 4 .%. .... :: .0 0.... . 000- 000%
00'A 0%~:~:~00$::::~::: 00070 . - ..W.4XX3 00 00 ' .. 00............................................:.... * . ' , . ' . , " . '.'.'.' 9.. ooo '.:9. ........ . 4
co S . 0 <x W.:00% 0.W% .00 %00% 000% W 4 o%000 co ' - X n~' ."'0 % x*.0%. ... ' oon' .. 00%
-A% 00 000%. W%:0*000 r4'00%"" 00 0 *.0
con .......... 0 ..% ...00..0 .0%~... 0% .... 0% , o . 00
00%<$9: 0W% 3 ~ 000'. . .07?::c30<3'0% ' 00% ' co ±2. 0%
.0% 00 ...... 0% "*..'. -A 000% o:~. ..' 0.'0--%
con .... cn '...<.cn""" 0.0% :<-!*< .0.W.: co ..-A0cn 1"0200%! 000% W.'.' 0.0% o 00.% "::': : 0.00% : .:. o o:...:.'...' coo 000% o 000.oon.:'.%'.'000%...~-~..:!:L:~.? . .. 00%.y 0.% :: 000..'........ 0.:: 000.0 .. 00.
W 'A O-A ..W-A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tob. Wtod-9
000% ""9".'000%"~ 000O" "" 000 X«< 0.000-A co .oo ' ~004 *9 0
.. 4.0 . ....... ........0'- -' o ':: con : 000% .:::.:::::: 0.00% .::A.::::o .: '..: o oo " on ':: 0, 0
004 ' A437 -A9..00 .00%. . ".' o 00 0 %.oo ' 4 20..... . 04 " 000% . 0 ... . '..04 :! 00! " 004 .. . 0004 ..::::::::::: . o. .. : : ::: oo9*::::::::: 490 ooI90. ::::.. ::::.~:o., :::::::: oo:.:~::s::::tos:::<.'.'C*o~.oo .:'::'::ih::: o .*¶ :~?:$:- o. .. :.!: .u
cn *0 104411 con3- ..>.. 0%<333 .0% .... 00 0e. 00 . 0%' 6 29..0. . 040 : .% :..--0'% O 00% ..... .. 0.0
con ' ..00 00.- % O. 3X-:<. 0.00 33 .'.'.00 "<"'00 '''"'''00 .'." 0. . .. . " ' . . ..,...........'..~~~~~~~~..... .. . ............ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.9%. *49. *~ t~..con .., 000% .~~~. -co-A33X o 00% . o. 004 00
co W0% ''''00% '..'."''. co OS ' 0.00 O..300% ' 00 00 00
co ..16 W00 99'W.%<"3 cnt*9: .9%*: 00 o . o W.2t 0%!i*ii0!4!! iL .4 .49..iii. tW:... .......... .... ....... o .0::. 000''0 ~:.~..... 0004 :::: 0::: : .':: 0::::.: :::..::::...:..'.: :% --:.. .0 0%::::::: ::: o. . 0004 . 000 :::::::: o .o n ::::'. 000, : ::: : 004., 4. : .:: 0
00% w00%'... . 00% .00% .03$ O00% 004 " 00% -00%A 00c:::::.on... '.. : .... '.:': 0 .'::.':..: 04 0 : : : : o ::: 000 0o. · "'"*'.... .. .. ....
000% . con * W'.00 ...000 WV* ~n .00 0%. 00 . 00000% . ' con '. . 0004 .<'..,.,.'.o4. 3.< 00 33:A c.On .'"'"00 ''" OoW% 00
00%W "'00%-% 'iji. 0004 . 000 ...$S .0%$$""00% """ 0 "... 00%..«.Ao,:::::::: co con ::.::: ::: 0007*0 :. .:.:.ooo: '.":::::: o~ooo :::::c~:::: o.oo i'::::.:.. con .. 0004:::~:::: o .o . 000 <':¥::::: A .~::.:::::: 000%::..... ..... .990..;.:.:..:<. !.:!!*9ci:.33 . . :..A:<:::.:.:i:i .... 3
00 ..'. ' A 00 W"3..<:00% *~333 0 . K$0S0:00% 00 . 00 ...'.. 0 C"" 00004 00 %''..... 0 %'""''' -A<::004*::. 04 cn 00 . '00
000 X. 00W '*330 .0 .0 M * .7 3k. 00 9i6. 20 ' 00 '*99
000 . 00 ''~~~03 0.00% :O. on . W:3< 0% 'X3 .. Won . 00% 00 .- A00:::::::: oon~ ":::::':::~0 0 .00% $:!i:.$:i : ~o :::::::~oo ~:::~~:o ,:::.: : i!i:: on, !:":00 !"":'~ 000%, :!!i.~~~ 000 oo, iii~~~ 00040004 000 .. ' :VS 004 A99 000 W k~ .... % ... A72 ' 00% 9
004M 00%I... oN70.:.3 . ... 0007 ......0...*3~"'00% ' 00 00 .9 000%
con con .$$$*0. 0.004 ~$$$$: o.on O:$ .0 $. . 00 0007 000$ .1 concon:!$ .:.0: : : o. ,..:.. 00,0%.0W :*::3:: 0.,0 : :'.:. .:.on '1... :::
00. 00% ' .' .... 004:333~ 04' 000 00% ''3'0% W".9' 0%4*04. 4904 '*994 *s%~::3x~t~.:s:*' 946 6.'. '4 '*4-,- 0*
0004 ' 00% 00% . ' 00% X::.3: . 00% $$': 004 00 . 004 ' 000%000% "0'~ 000%A '" . 000% .'.'. .'.' 0 t! :S .".0 $$ 0% ' 00. . '.'.."'. 0'0 : ' :."..'. :o
00%..''''.. 0%9'9 .,O00 W%'... 004"'::..: % -I".'' 04 .00 . c n .00.0'0i . . %. . %.!i!!'i!....!iii..o.. '., 000%,~ 3:,.3004'!..:9' 0.0,,, . % '0$i~i ."''on:.'.o.'.'.' ~!.!'.'i.o.~ 0:00! ..o...~.'. 000.ii ! o.,
-'A .- A W% W% OW% NN. 'W.A *99%. A bo 0000:::::': o 0::::::: ::::::::: . .o./. 0: ..:: :: .oo ::..::.... 000%:: :% . 0 - ..' ' 0: .%0004:~~i:::oo. :~:!::'"':::: con ."":: '3::i~ on., :.'::::::': o on :< o *:c:i::.':ion.".'.!0o."~: :~:$ioo ..!!i~!iii 0004 i ,.:i:!i: 0004. 0004!!:'::oo.
.00% . con . 00070 .. .... , 0007093:.33::3.':04070C.:C.:: 0004 0004 000% 0004~-4 . ....
004 00-A .' 0% ".''00 37' .W% :~' 04 00..O% 00
0004 ' ~ 000% "'.'4 004 ,::s~, 000% 999999 0.00% 99:'' 0% ., 0 . 0$ .3: 000%
:::o.: *9 :4: ::: o. 9' ::: ::::::o.:. :?.:oo.: :::::. .'.:::"::'.'. o ""o.. :::. o oo10.03%:~i o ::::-:::o, :..'.':3'io. 0o.,% :.'. : :!0004 ~: on. k:!:.9~ 0.00., !.'$$ ~,.: 00. 000 00:0%::i~ 0004:.'~:000% : : con::: : "':000% ""o""" :0:::::::: o'.'33 0004 33:.:::::::. oo/ :::::;::oo' ::::::::O ,:::::::: 0004 ":':::::: o' ~ 000:::::::: ton% AI::::::: 00040004:~!i:: 4.. ::! 0004oo. coni~ii!:: o. ~i!i~!~~ ocon::::!:::::: $.5:".': ii!::oo. con ~ ~ : ~~ o~ :::!:!:!: 0004. 000 ii' : ioo. 3 00:0:0:.::' o"'6:66ii.:6i " o :::::~i! 323% "49.'.!:::~:: 397. co0.~ :>':!: 4... :.:i,~ :::::: o. ~ :. ~: . ii::-:ooo. :3,.3:'c0. 000% i~ 46 "~' 4
,::9.:: . ':::: . '94o, ' :~::::: .::: ':::: o9.4too.:::::::.::::::: o.o* :C:9::::::: ..'.o9::::::::::::::: o.4'270 .1*9.:::::::: o ' ::,::' t.00*000%:!:::i 000, :i..::::oo., .:::::: oo ::::.c. :o..,000 .c9i?3:99:0.004 o j4..oo .' O:!!i~~on."."'i~~::$:o !:."::::: 000~ ' ::::. 0 ". oon
0::0:: :.:0004: .~' :*:*:'i.i :.:! : :944*.A94 "".':~::~::.':i.'.:: 000: ".'.:'. con :.':!~', .. '.' .~.q:: ::: .": ' :::.'::::::. ' P.' ~::::::::g~ co. 000% ~:! :...".. 0:.:!!:!:$ii o.(i:~i:::°~, ' 99. . .:.'::: t o9 ""!::! ": .o~i":.":::!:""t s:i$.:0: %o7 i9::"":"."o":::::"':: o. o.a. : : : 9:! *::1oo6
0::::::'::: . ""' 0004:::::: ".o ::::: '. !o.oo:::::: .on , : ~~:oo, :::::::::...:. 00 :::~:: ~o i:~:: .o.~:: s7,0004i''!!!' ~ ..:.~i~~.!o .~ii:~i:o~ .,ii!.:."~ .,. . «:.':333.~ o.,.7 *':'3"' oon. co "".C".'ii~".i o.,!-:!!:!!! 000%. :!"""""~' oon
~:iiiii!~i~:~!:' ~:~!i i ~ ~~.'~ ~i~~..:i40!(":.'""."",'...: : : :4'%""i; . ""-i.i'."";.;.40i9{ W"!!!. '.:"S.'' * i ""!4'9{.9'.".! t.o{{ t ii. '$'. !i{ 7{94 1..'000%:~:~ . con, '::i.$:::3 0.00 o. ::'i:::::3o3.~:::::::. ~.0% <:::3:::: on.~:::!i. o'.o'.:::::: .o..::~::: 0004. 000 : $::. 00. 000
.i :9..'i4i91.:..04~
.i~~~~ii!..~.:.:-/":":::..o ~ !i:.!~i''' ~,.:~...:i:''i... .i!.~.: :o..~-.:!::!:':*r":00 o..' ~:!!.'.'' 0o0 o o*9" : !:! "".":' 0004, o.,i~!:...::~!::~:: .i:i:i~:! : : : 00:0.. 4! """"""":' 0::.0.0%i : !!: .. ":""'.."'::!:..:!:` ::.....0::0:% i .'.' :.." !i!!!ii'! 000% . . :ii 0004: : iii..0004 ii! 0004:~.g.~ i
::00004$:i oo ..:i::: o004/. :!i41:ii:: 0003 :i$i9:9:%i:3: 1040 oo, 4J' 000.00$0:0:!:! 21 o0o0!!:0!: .'0i 0 99999 000.00:?. . 0 o 9oo 99 0.00:404~: Woo., 2::04::!: 0o.0
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 100
I
I
Appendix 11WARG v. WAEG WASG Results
Govt WARG v. WAEG, WASG
Resion StatirtiesMultiple R 0.324732045R Square 0.105450901Adjusted R Square 0.086004181Standard Error 0.007218946Observations 95
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifiance FRegression 2 0.000565173 0.000282587 5.422554713 0.005940082Residual 92 0.004794412 5.21132E-05Total 94 0.005359586
Coeffidients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper95% Lowtr 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.028927222 0.003017706 9.585832784 1.69733E-15 0.022933798 0.034920646 0.022933798 0.034920646WAEG 0.295090251 0.090955821 3.244325084 0.001641762 0.11444414 0.475736362 0.11444414 0.475736362WASG -0.213957486 0.117706261 -1.817723919 0.072361243 -0.44773228 0.019817308 -0.44773228 0.019817308
NREI WARG v. WAEG, WASG
Reion StatiSti.sMultiple R 0.527452059R Square 0.278205674Adjusted R Square 0.262514493Standard Error 0.010895403Observations 95
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifiance FRegression 2 0.004209465 0.002104733 17.73006598 3.06916E-07Residual 92 0.010921301 0.00011871Total 94 0.015130767
Coeffidients Standard Errr t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.060642803 0.00455456 13.31474574 3.56402E-23 0.051597054 0.069688551 0.051597054 0.069688551WAEG -0.077721664 0.137277701 -0.566163797 0.572660907 -0.350367028 0.194923699 -0.350367028 0.194923699WASG -0.924576985 0.177651576 -5.204440103 1.17635E-06 -1.277408349 -0.571745621 -1.277408349 -0.571745621
Average Govt WARG v. Average WAEG & WASG
Rtgosion StatisticsMultiple R 0.742580571R Square 0.551425904Adjusted R Square 0.495354142Standard Error 0.003172582Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Ssnificance FRegression 2 0.00019797 9.89849E-05 9.834288862 0.001639357Residual 16 0.000161044 1.00653E-05Total 18 0.000359014
Coeffaents StandardErnmr tStat P-value Lower95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.025620884 0.003261855 7.854697291 7.02843E-07 0.018706061 0.032535706 0.018706061 0.032535706WAEG 0.479364224 0.109072992 4.39489386 0.000452009 0.248139862 0.710588585 0.248139862 0.710588585WASG -0.332225506 0.127155 -2.612760069 0.018845707 -0.601782003 -0.062669009 -0.601782003 -0.062669009
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 101
Appendix 11WARG v. WAEG WASG Results
Average NREI WARG v. Average WAEG & WASG
Rignsson StatistisMultiple R 0.638454687R Square 0.407624388Adjusted R Square 0.333577436Standard Error 0.007653567Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significana FRegression 2 0.000644927 0.000322464 5.504944899 0.015162729Residual 16 0.000937233 5.85771E-05Total 18 0.001582161
Coeffldents Standard Enor t Stat P-valae Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.062091581 0.007868929 7.890728177 6.62564E-07 0.0454102 0.078772962 0.0454102 0.078772962WAEG -0.275777764 0.263128695 -1.048071798 0.310180375 -0.833585553 0.282030024 -0.833585553 0.282030024WASG -0.696699748 0.306749897 -2.271230585 0.037292493 -1.346980334 -0.046419163 -1.346980334 -0.046419163
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 102
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in FFO per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
Reission StatitmsMultiple R 0.014068772R Square 0.00019793Adjusted R Square -0.010669483Standard Error 0.307616636Observations 94
ANOVAdf SS MS F Siqnfwance F
Regression 1 0.001723478 0.001723478 0.018213197 0.892941268Residual 92 8.705775513 0.094627995Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffwients Standard Error tStat P-Value Loer 95% Upper95% Loer 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.091000127 0.149712822 0.607831219 0.544796963 -0.206342461 0.388342715 -0,206342461 0.388342715WARG 0.589475334 4.36789861 0.134956277 0.892941268 -8.085548332 9.264499 -8.085548332 9.264499
% Change in FFO per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
Pagtcesiyn Statirti sMultiple R 0.296930873R Square 0.088167943Adjusted R Square 0.078256725Standard Error 0.293771886Observations 94
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 0.767722276 0.767722276 8.895772761 0.003658711Residual 92 7.939776715 0.086301921Total 93 8.707498991
Ceff-icfts Standard Ervr IStat P-vale Loer 95% Upper 95% Loar 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.172569871 0.099705799 -1.730790714 0.086841753 -0.370594194 0.025454452 -0.370594194 0.025454452WARG 7.240973122 2.42775633 2.982578207 0.003658711 2.419239492 12.06270675 2.419239492 12.06270675
% Change in FFO per Unit v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
Rerssion StatisticsMultiple R 0.109580441R Square 0.012007873Adjusted R Square 0.001268828Standard Error 0.305794412Observations 94
ANOVAdf SS MS F Sienifsncr F
Regression 1 0.104558543 0.104558543 1.118150942 0.293085625Residual 92 8.602940448 0.093510222Total 93 8.707498991
Coefficients Standard Eror t Stat P-vae Loner 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper950%Intercept -0.006899343 0.115640485 -0.059662 0.952554245 -0.236571327 0.222772642 -0.236571327 0.222772642WAEG 3.767689882 3.563074736 1.057426566 0.293085625 -3.308884101 10.84426386 -3.308884101 10.84426386
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 103
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in FFO per Unit v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Rereion Stairti
Multiple R 0.02708513
R Square 0.000733604
Adjusted R Square -0.010127987Standard Error 0.307534217
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifxnce F
Regression 1 0.006387859 0.006387859 0.067541143 0.795531821Residual 92 8.701111133 0.094577295
Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffientsr StandardError tStat P-luse Loer95% Upper 95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.135775414 0.101398437 1.339028663 0.18386043 -0.065610635 0.337161463 -0.065610635 0.337161463WASG -1.203275306 4.629997963 -0.25988679 0.795531821 -10.39885091 7.9923003 -10.39885091 7.9923003
% Change in FFO per Unit v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
Rensrrion Sakirc
Multiple R 0.130894587
R Square 0.017133393
Adjusted R Square 0.00645006Standard Error 0.305000178Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Snifricnce F
Regression 1 0.149189002 0.149189002 1.603749826 0.208569659
Residual 92 8.55830999 0.093025109
Total 93 8.707498991
Coefficwient Standard Ermr t Stal P-vaue Lorwr 95% Upper95% Loer95.0% Upper950%
Intercept 0.063707768 0.048675045 1.308838406 0.19384906 -0.032965072 0.160380608 -0.032965072 0.160380608
WAED 4.512661369 3.563398839 1.266392445 0.208569659 -2.564556309 11.58987905 -2.564556309 11.58987905
% Change in FFO per Unit v. % Change in Rental Revenue per Unit
Reclrsion StatirtitMultiple R 0.878280019
R Square 0.771375791
Adjusted R Square 0.768890745Standard Error 0.147100419
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifgcan F
Regression 1 6.716753924 6.716753924 310.4070788 3.11527E-31Residual 92 1.990745067 0.021638533Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffirntr Standard Eror tStat P-Vale Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.00540772 0.016307795 0.331603365 0.740942985 -0.026980969 0.037796408 -0.026980969 0.037796408
% D Rent Rev per Unit 0.912534709 0.051794493 17.61837333 3.11527E-31 0.809666376 1.015403042 0.809666376 1.015403042
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 104
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in FFO per Unit v. % Change in Rental NOI per Unit
Reression StaiticsMultiple R 0.891236439
R Square 0.79430239
Adjusted R Square 0.792066547Standard Error 0.139529946
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sign4ance F
Regression 1 6.916387262 6.916387262 355.2584787 2.3781E-33Residual 92 1.791111729 0.019468606Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffcient Standard Emr Stat P-value Lwer95% Upper 95% Lowr 95 0% Upper 95. 0%
Intercept -0.009207134 0.015735786 -0.585107977 0.559907482 -0.040459763 0.022045495 -0.040459763 0.022045495% D Rental NOI per Unit 0.926996028 0.049181939 18.84830175 2.3781E-33 0.829316452 1.024675605 0.829316452 1.024675605
% Change in FFO v. % Change in Number of Apartments
Reegssion Statistics
Multiple R 0.254923966
R Square 0.064986228
Adjusted R Square 0.054823035Standard Error 0.318792839Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sgnificarn F
Regression 1 0.649842731 0.649842731 6.394272656 0.013152117Residual 92 9.34985642 0.101628874
Total 93 9.999699151
Coefficents StandardErrr tStat P-alPe Lwer 95% Upper 95% Loaer95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.269816587 0.036496578 7.39292832 6.4605E-11 0.197331232 0.342301942 0.197331232 0.342301942# Apts 0.162295427 0.064181625 2.528689909 0.013152117 0.03482518 0.289765674 0.03482518 0.289765674
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
Renssion Statitic
Multiple R 0.084160568
R Square 0.007083001
Adjusted R Square -0.003709575Standard Error 0.295048143Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sifzancr F
Regression 1 0.057131808 0.057131808 0.656284575 0.419965221Residual 92 8.008913427 0.087053407
Total 93 8.066045235
Coeffientr Standard Ewr tStat P-Yalae Laer 95% Upper 95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.001747998 0.143595908 0.012173038 0.99031392 -0.28344587 0.286941867 -0.28344587 0.286941867WARG 3.393920888 4.189436539 0.810113927 0.419965221 -4.926661701 11.71450348 -4.926661701 11.71450348
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 105
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
ReiRresrrion StatirtiiMultiple R 0.273574716
R Square 0.074843125
Adjusted R Square 0.064787072Standard Error 0.284802701Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Srnifcn F
Regression 1 0.603688035 0.603688035 7.442594569 0.007630005Residual 92 7.462357201 0.081112578
Total 93 8.066045235
Ceffcient Standard Error Sta P-Vae Lor 95% Upper95% Lower950% Upper95.0%
Intercept -0.135797299 0.096661669 -1.404872279 0.163426777 -0.327775717 0.056181119 -0.327775717 0.056181119WARG 6.420977501 2.353634207 2.728111906 0.007630005 1.746456806 11.0954982 1.746456806 11.0954982
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
Regrnion Stairficr
Multiple R 0.060028008
R Square 0.003603362
Adjusted R Square -0.007227036Standard Error 0.295564683
Observations 94
ANOVA
d/ SS MS F Signifance F
Regression 1 0.029064879 0.029064879 0.332708153 0.565477467Residual 92 8.036980356 0.087358482Total 93 8.066045235
Ceeffwientr Sbandard Ener t Sa P-Vwale Lewr 95% Upper 95% Lwer 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.053407967 0.111771968 0.47782971 0.633904792 -0.16858081 0.275396744 -0.16858081 0.275396744WAEG 1.986459196 3.443879339 0.576808593 0.565477467 -4.85338244 8.826300831 -4.85338244 8.826300831
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Reorision Slailicr
Multiple R 0.092206001
R Square 0.008501947
Adjusted R Square -0.002275206Standard Error 0.294837246
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinnifance F
Regression 1 0.068577086 0.068577086 0.788886159 0.376753427Residual 92 7.997468149 0.086929002Total 93 8.066045235
CoeffWcintr Standard Errr Sta P-value Laoer 95% Upper95% Laewr95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.197444295 0.097212064 2.031067822 0.045133793 0.004372745 0.390515846 0.004372745 0.390515846WASG -3.942546915 4.438842154 -0.888192636 0.376753427 -12.75847058 4.873376754 -12.75847058 4.873376754
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 106
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
Rrtsrion Statiri
Multiple R 0.13174417
R Square 0.017356526
Adjusted R Square 0.006675619Standard Error 0.293517771Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance FRegression 1 0.139998527 0.139998527 1.625004866 0.2056055Residual 92 7.926046708 0.086152682
Total 93 8.066045235
Coeffzientr Stndard Enrr tS tat P-value LoaWr95% Upper 95% Lwr 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.069868446 0.046842565 1.491558934 0.139235874 -0.023164931 0.162901823 -0.023164931 0.162901823WAED 4.371455625 3.429246794 1.274756787 0.2056055 -2.439324513 11.18223576 -2.439324513 11.18223576
% Change in Rental NOI per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
Refrion SttirtsMultiple R 0.080268703
R Square 0.006443065
Adjusted R Square -0.004356467Standard Error 0.294824957Observations 94
ANOVA
4/ SS MS F Signi[ane FRegression 1 0.051858034 0.051858034 0.596605927 0.441855712Residual 92 7.996801473 0.086921755Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffientr Sfndrd Enmr Stat P-Vale Lower95% Upper 95% Lwer 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.021087185 0.143487286 0.146962043 0.883483554 -0.263890952 0.306065321 -0.263890952 0.306065321WARG 3.233484292 4.186267479 0.772402697 0.441855712 -5.080804269 11.54777285 -5.080804269 11.54777285
% Change in Rental NOI per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
ReMion Siaftitir
Multiple R 0.248392412
R Square 0.06169879
Adjusted R Square 0.051499864Standard Error 0.286509484Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sni*cance FRegression 1 0.496592557 0.496592557 6.049537895 0.015778731Residual 92 7.552066951 0.082087684
Total 93 8.048659507
Caeffrients Standard Error Stat P-value Loer 95% Upper 95% Loer950% Upper 95. 0%Intercept -0.098460641 0.097240949 -1.012542991 0.31393409 -0.29158956 0.094668277 -0.29158956 0.094668277WARG 5.82364599 2.367739211 2.459580837 0.015778731 1.12111154 10.52618044 1.12111154 10.52618044
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 107
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Rental NOI per Unit v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
Reftnuion Statrtics
Multiple R 0.083498065
R Square 0.006971927
Adjusted R Square -0.003821856Standard Error 0.29474648Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Siniwnc F
Regression 1 0.056114666 0.056114666 0.645920589 0.423646671Residual 92 7.992544841 0.086875487Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffident Standar Errr t Stat P-vale Lover95% Upper 95% Loaer95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.043214497 0,111462553 0.387704174 0.699130526 -0.178159754 0.264588749 -0.178159754 0.264588749WAEG 2.760155683 3.434345743 0.80369185 0.423646671 -4.060751407 9.581062772 -4.060751407 9.581062772
% Change in Rental NOI per Unit v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Refresnon Statitics
Multiple R 0.065763995
R Square 0.004324903Adjusted R Square -0.006497652Standard Error 0.295139058Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sianircasa FRegression 1 0.034809671 0.034809671 0.399619389 0.528853757Residual 92 8.013849836 0.087107063Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffientr Standard Err tSlat P-vale Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0/Intercept 0.187828263 0.097311576 1.93017389 0.056665551 -0.005440926 0.381097452 -0.005440926 0.381097452WASG -2.808906726 4.443386 -0.632154561 0.528853757 ' -11.63385486 6.016041412 -11.63385486 6.016041412
% Change in Rental NOI per Unit v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
ReArion Statirics
Multiple R 0.134757766R Square 0.018159656
Adjusted R Square 0.007487478Standard Error 0.293081429Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifcan FRegression 1 0.146160885 0.146160885 1,701588578 0.19533424Residual 92 7.902498623 0.085896724Total 93 8.048659507
Coficintr Standard Enrror Stat P-value Lor 95% Upper95% Loer 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.082841411 0.046772929 1.771140125 0.079849082 -0.010053663 0.175736485 -0.010053663 0.175736485WAED 4.466629428 3.424148902 1.304449531 0.19533424 -2.334025855 11.26728471 -2.334025855 11.26728471
% Change in Net Income per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
RcWrusion Stadrdi
Multiple R 0.138561413R Square 0.019199265Adjusted R Square 0.008421235Standard Error 0.783637583Observations 93
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 108
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
ANOVA
df SS MS F Srnifwnt FRegression 1 1.093895224 1.093895224 1.781333411 0.185315499
Residual 91 55.88199535 0.614087861Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffzcients Standar Error IStat P-te Lover 95% Upper95% Lomer 95,0% Upper 950%
Intercept 0.698715128 0.381389048 1.832027245 0.0702185 -0.058867442 1.456297697 -0.058867442 1.456297697
WARG -14.85329009 11.12884404 -1.33466603 0.185315499 -36.95937389 7.252793708 -36.95937389 7.252793708
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 109
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Net Income per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
Reemsion Statistcs
Multiple R 0.120588376
R Square 0.014541556
Adjusted R Square 0.003712343
Standard Error 0.785496081Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifmanc F
Regression 1 0.828518127 0.828518127 1.342808155 0.249571236
Residual 91 56.14737244 0.617004093
Total 92 56.97589057
Coffint Standard Error t fSta P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lovr 95,0% Upper95.0%
Intercept -0.099378804 0.272021831 -0.365333928 0.715709937 -0.639716809 0.440959201 -0.639716809 0.440959201
WARG 7.64208542 6.594849708 1.158795994 0.249571236 -5.457774706 20.74194555 -5.457774706 20.74194555
% Change in Net Income per Unit v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
Raexresion StatitcsMultiple R 0.068263648
R Square 0.004659926
Adjusted R Square -0.006277877Standard Error 0.789424517Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F SirnifiWanc F
Regression 1 0.265503409 0.265503409 0.426038535 0.515584772
Residual 91 56.71038716 0.623191068Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffciens Standard Error t Stat P-value Louver95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95 0%
Intercept 0.01398557 0.298535647 0.046847237 0.962737639 -0.579018879 0.606990019 -0.579018879 0.606990019
WAEG 6.007433211 9.203743567 0.652716274 0.515584772 -12.2746746 24.28954102 -12.2746746 24.28954102
% Change in Net Income per Unit v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Remcrssion Stamtitic
Multiple R 0.138526964
R Square 0.01918972
Adjusted R Square 0.008411585Standard Error 0.783641396Observations 93
ANOVA
lf SS MS F Signiofane F
Regression 1 1.09335138 1.09335138 1.780430471 0.185425874
Residual 91 55.88253919 0.614093837
Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffucint StndardError t Stat P-value Loer 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept -0.126054862 0.258494659 -0.487649772 0.626970731 -0.6395228 0.387413076 -0.6395228 0.387413076
WASG 15.77640694 11.82348735 1.334327722 0.185425874 -7.70950059 39.26231447 -7.70950059 39.26231447
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 110
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Net Income per Unit v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
Rerrston StStiricrMultiple R 0.038866412R Square 0.001510598Adjusted R Square -0.009461813Standard Error 0.790672428Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significanr FRegression 1 0.086067665 0.086067665 0.137672384 0.711468432Residual 91 56.8898229 0.625162889Total 92 56.97589057
CoeffzentXr Sandard Ewr ISaW P-z'alu LosJer9/5 Upper 95% Loiar95.0% Upper 95. 0%Intercept 0.237159849 0.126582447 1.873560311 0.064200434 -0.014280658 0.488600355 -0.014280658 0.488600355WAED -3.428017651 9.238886522 -0.371042294 0.711468432 -21.77993263 14.92389733 -21.77993263 14.92389733
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 111
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
Regsersion StatitsMultiple R 0.059894539
R Square 0.003587356
Adjusted R Square -0.007608292Standard Error 0.353461102Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiniFana FRegression 1 0.04003211 0.04003211 0.320424138 0.572777408Residual 89 11.11919281 0.124934751Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffiientr Standard Ervr tStat P-valse Lowr95% Upper 95% Lowar95.0% Upper95. 0%Intercept 0.223472325 0.173709915 1.286468452 0.201616041 -0.121685388 0.568630039 -0.121685388 0.568630039WARG -2.880530302 5.088735011 -0.566060189 0.572777408 -12.9917329 .7.230672291 -12.9917329 7.230672291
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
Rtrxssion StatirisrMultiple R 0.490005653R Square 0.24010554
Adjusted R Square 0.2315674Standard Error 0.308673006Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifianrc FRegression 1 2.679391729 2.679391729 28.1215277 8.22903E-07Residual 89 8.479833187 0.095279025Total 90 11.15922492
Coefficnrs Standard Enrr t Stat P-valae Lower 95% Upper 95% Loar95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.414391089 0.10716994 -3.86667277 0.000209497 -0.627335362 -0.201446816 -0.627335362 -0.201446816WARG 13.8003871 2.602386597 5.302973477 8.22903E-07 8.629503168 18.97127104 8.629503168 18.97127104
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
Rersfion StatirircMultiple R 0.065715223
R Square 0.004318491
Adjusted R Square -0.006868942Standard Error 0.353331399Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SOnicanc FRegression 1 0.048191007 0.048191007 0.386012652 0.535990906Residual 89 11.11103391 0.124843078Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffiecntr Standard E"rr ISltat P-value Lo"wer 95% Upper 95% LoWr 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.047536617 0.13378029 0.355333488 0.723180518 -0.218281825 0.313355059 -0.218281825 0.313355059WAEG 2.562810612 4.12492203 0.621299165 0.535990906 -5.633317157 10.75893838 -5.633317157 10.75893838
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 112
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Rerssion StaterMultiple R 0.153234478R Square 0.023480805Adjusted R Square 0.01250868Standard Error 0.349914875Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiRnicance FRegression 1 0.262027588 0.262027588 2.140041578 0.147020611Residual 89 10.89719733 0.122440419Total 90 11.15922492
CoeffWentr Standard Errr iStat P-value Lorer 95% Upper95% Loerr95.0% Uppr 95. 0%
Intercept 0.28816999 0.115855701 2.487318159 0.01473506 0.057967304 0.518372676 0.057967304 0.518372676WASG -7.731302289 5.284958102 -1.462888095 0.147020611 -18.23239577 2.769791196 -18.23239577 2.769791196
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
Ressrrion Statistics
Multiple R 0.184647847
R Square 0.034094827
Adjusted R Square 0.02324196Standard Error 0.348008024Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiOnicane F
Regression 1 0.380471846 0.380471846 3.141550244 0.079743088Residual 89 10.77875307 0.121109585
Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffiernts StandadErr tStat P-Vawle Lowr 95% Upper95/o Lowr95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.052529461 0.055816259 0.94111396 0.349193907 -0.058376198 0.163435119 -0.058376198 0.163435119WAED 7.220162382 4.073567903 1.772441887 0.079743088 -0.873925885 15.31425065 -0,873925885 15.31425065
Cap Rate v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (Govt Data)
Regrersion Statiticr
Multiple R 0.111164828
R Square 0.012357619
Adjusted R Square 0.001260514Standard Error 0.014607127
Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiniFncance F
Regression 1 0.000237605 0.000237605 1.113589397 0.294159271Residual 89 0.018989767 0.000213368Total 90 0.019227372
Coefficenftr Standanrd Err tStat P-value Lowr 95% Upper 95% Loer95.0% Upper 95. 0%
Intercept 0.081297853 0.007178733 11.32481935 6.16923B-19 0.067033872 0.095561835 0.067033872 0.095561835WARG -0.221919553 0.210296974 -1.055267453 0.294159271 -0.639774935 0.19593583 -0.639774935 0.19593583
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 113
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
Cap Rate v. Weighted Average Rent Growth (NREI Data)
Rcrsimon Stnatstic
Multiple R 0.352740784
R Square 0.124426061
Adjusted R Square 0.114588151Standard Error 0.013753441
Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F S~iniicanc F
Regression 1 0.002392386 0.002392386 12.64761192 0.000605036Residual 89 0.016834985 0.000189157
Total 90 0.019227372
Coefflient Standard Eror tStat P-value Lower95% Upper95 Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%/o
Intercept 0.09008621 0.004775136 18.86568637 7.46225E-33 0.080598123 0.099574298 0.080598123 0.099574298WARG -0.412371648 0.115953679 -3.556348116 0.000605036 -0.642769013 -0.181974282 -0.642769013 -0.181974282
Cap Rate v. Weighted Average Employment Growth
eruession Slatirtia
Multiple R 0.239665667
R Square 0.057439632
Adjusted R Square 0,046849066Standard Error 0.014269854
Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SInifcnce F
Regression 1 0.001104413 0.001104413 5.423660274 0.022130773Residual 89 0.018122958 0.000203629
Total 90 0.019227372
Coefficient Standad Eror Stat P-value Lover 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95. 0%
Intercept 0.085987587 0.005402931 15.91498809 9.0624E-28 0.075252083 0.09672309 0.075252083 0.09672309WAEG -0.387971027 0.166591583 -2.328875324 0.022130773 -0.718984774 -0.056957279 -0.718984774 -0.056957279
Cap Rate v. Weighted Average Stock Growth
Regr.rion Statirtics
Multiple R 0.10994458
R Square 0.012087811
Adjusted R Square 0.000987674Standard Error 0.014609122Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SOniFance F
Regression 1 0.000232417 0.000232417 1.088978525 0.299523882Residual 89 0.018994955 0.000213426Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffmients. StandardEror tStat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lorr 95.0% Upper95.0%/Intercept 0.069108738 0.004837034 14.28742052 9.25109E-25 0.05949766 0.078719816 0.05949766 0.078719816WASG 0.230257047 0.220649665 1.043541339 0.299523882 -0.2081689 0.668682994 -0.2081689 0.668682994
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 114
Appendix 12Panel Data Results without Apartment Growth
Cap Rate v. Weighted Average Excess Demand
RIruion StafirtwrMultiple R 0.325510351
R Square 0.105956988
Adjusted R Square 0.095911561Standard Error 0.013897739Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifcwan FRegression 1 0.002037274 0.002037274 10.54778332 0.001641329
Residual 89 0.017190097 0.000193147Total 90 0.019227372
CoeffwentS Standard Eemr St Da P-alue Lorr95% Upper 95% Loaer95.0%/ Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.07937574 0.002229029 35.61001454 1.93834E-54 0.07494671 0.083804769 0.07494671 0.083804769WAED -0.528336317 0.16267839 -3.247735106 0.001641329 -0.851574638 -0.205097997 -0.851574638 -0.205097997
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 115
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
RerMssin Statutics
Multiple R 0.48093192
R Square 0.231295512
Adjusted K Square 0.214400908Standard Error 0.271210019
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinecance F
Regression 2 2.014005434 1.007002717 13.69049607 6.33948E-06
Residual 91 6.693493557 0.073554874Total 93 8.707498991
Coefficientr Standard Enr t Stat P-lcue Lower95% Upper 95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.168269944 0.132818363 1.266917766 0.208417612 -0.095557445 0.432097334 -0.095557445 0.432097334
Govt WARG 0.386738625 3.851150199 0,10042159 0.920230545 -7.263098925 8.036576175 -7.263098925 8.036576175
% D # of Apts -0.285606814 0.054604681 -5.230445579 1.07371E-06 -0.394072316 -0.177141311 -0.394072316 -0.177141311
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Reeomsion Statisti
Multiple R 0.482364534
R Square 0.232675543
Adjusted R Square 0.207098061Standard Error 0.272467673Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinificane F
Regression 3 2.026022059 0.675340686 9.096890161 2.54039E-05
Residual 90 6.681476932 0.074238633
Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffcsents StandardEvr t Stat P-Value Lower95% Upper95% Lowr95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.219853332 0.185049705 1.18807718 0.237928823 -0.14777991 0.587486574 -0.14777991 0.587486574
Govt WARG 0.55191972 3.890731793 0.14185499 0.88751161 -7.177691856 8.281531295 -7.177691856 8.281531295
% D # ofApts -0.291217725 0.056602881 -5.144927617 1.55512E-06 -0.403669137 -0.178766313 -0.403669137 -0.178766313
% Total in MSA -0.068761794 0.170911362 -0.4023243 0.688399321 -0.408306772 0.270783184 -0.408306772 0.270783184
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
RtsOn StaistirsMultiple R 0.609000884
R Square 0.370882076
Adjusted R Square 0.357055309Standard Error 0.245353382Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signiancea F
Regression 2 3.229455305 1.614727653 26.82348386 6.95518E-10Residual 91 5.478043686 0.060198282Total 93 8.707498991
Ceffiientr Standard Emr I Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower95.0% Upper 950%
Intercept -0.171119462 0.08327293 -2.054923033 0.042753233 -0.336530925 -0.005707999 -0.336530925 -0.005707999
NREI WARG 9.219180468 2.05108359 4.494785347 2.04482E-05 5.144954469 13.29340647 5.144954469 13.29340647
% D # of Apts -0.319535469 0.049967848 -6.394821505 6.78966E-09 -0.418790471 -0.220280467 -0.418790471 -0.220280467
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 116
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Regrwion Statistis
Multiple R 0.609824364
R Square 0.371885755
Adjusted R Square 0.350948613
Standard Error 0.246515813Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifrancn FSs k~~~~~~~~~~~~~inificanot Regression 3 3.238194833 1.079398278 17.7620118 3.86691E-09
Residual 90 5.469304158 0.060770046
Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffoaients Standard Error t Stat P-sare Lowr 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper95.0/
Intercept -0.225817183 0.166745071 -1.354266018 0.179042033 -0.557085102 0.105450737 -0,557085102 0.105450737
NREI WARG 9.361885466 2.094876355 4.468944166 2.28128E-05 5.200051295 13.52371964 5.200051295 13.52371964
% D # of Apts -0.315202472 0.051488356 -6.121820465 2.37293E-08 -0.417492995 -0.212911948 -0.417492995 -0.212911948% Total in MSA 0.059277606 0.156311688 0.379226955 0.705412596 -0.251262596 0.369817807 -0.251262596 0.369817807
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Regrsson Statrtics
Multiple R 0.517045731
R Square 0.267336288
Adjusted R Square 0.242914165
Standard Error 0.266242757Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifcance FRegression 3 2.327830462 0.775943487 10.94647998 3.38301E-06
Residual 90 6.379668529 0.070885206Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffzaclts Standard Error tStat P.-value LoWer95% Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.153434738 0.114217594 1.34335466 0.182534681 -0.073478266 0.380347742 -0.073478266 0.380347742
WAEG 6.064926759 3,376533686 1.796199097 0.075818211 -0.643141352 12.77299487 -0.643141352 12.77299487
WASG -7.589092059 4,411305147 -1.720373405 0.088801221 -16.35291263 1.174728515 -16.35291263 1,174728515
% D # of Apts -0.300697858 0.054308329 -5.536864495 3.01495E-07 -0.408590746 -0.192804971 -0.408590746 -0.192804971
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Rersion Statirtics
Multiple R 0.516087308
R Square 0.266346109
Adjusted R Square 0.250221848
Standard Error 0.264954703Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sienifiance FRegression 2 2.319208475 1.159604238 16.51834483 7.58317E-07
Residual 91 6.388290516 0.070200995Total 93 8.707498991
Coefftcierti Standard Errr t Stat P-Malue Loaer95% Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 95 0%
Intercept 0.116609875 0.043341535 2.690487892 0.008488934 0.030517231 0.202702519 0.030517231 0.202702519WAED 6.505457509 3.116218748 2.087612595 0.039627788 0.315471151 12.69544387 0.315471151 12.69544387% D # ofApts -0.298556085 0.053698944 -5.559812975 2.67743E-07 -0.405222452 -0.191889719 -0.405222452 -0.191889719
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 117
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
ReMsrion StatlrtiasMultiple R 0.519771761
R Square 0.270162684
Adjusted R Square 0.237361007Standard Error 0.267217407Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significanc FRegression 4 2.352441298 0.588110324 8.236246059 1.0672E-05Residual 89 6.355057693 0.071405143
Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffeienx Standardar for tSa P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lowe r95.5.0%Intercept 0.224421194 0.16661805 1.346920059 0.181425705 -0.106645143 0.555487531 -0.106645143 0.555487531Govt WARG -2.353873163 4.009448313 -0.587081558 0.558635317 -10.32055724 5.612810912 -10.32055724 5.612810912
WAEG 6.713165449 3.564238977 1.88347793 0.062901153 -0.368897639 13.79522854 -0.368897639 13.79522854
WASG -8.166658258 4.535437636 -1.800632908 0.075148178 -17.17847135 0.845154832 -17.17847135 0.845154832
% D # of Apts -0.30217881 0.054565479 -5.537911817 3.06562E-07 -0.410599195 -0.193758424 -0.410599195 -0.193758424
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
ReRrresion Statirts
Multiple R 0.519965261
R Square 0.270363872
Adjusted R Square 0.228907274Standard Error 0.268694357Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significancn FRegression 5 2.354193145 0.470838629 6.521612583 3.33279E-05Residual 88 6.353305846 0.072196657Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffments Standard iEr t Sat P-valrie Lower95% Upper 95% Lower 95. 0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.236556717 0.184766332 1.280302064 0.203803444 -0.130627826 0.60374126 -0.130627826 0.60374126Govt WARG -2.276284708 4.062261126 -0.560349184 0.57666509 -10.3491813 5.796611886 -10.3491813 5.796611886
WAEG 6.861115981 3.707656627 1.850526268 0.067593052 -0.50707814 14.2293101 -0.50707814 14.2293101
WASG -7.732007623 5.346398957 -1.446208501 0.151671098 -18.35686028 2.892845035 -18.35686028 2.892845035
% D # of Apts -0.304130632 0.056279624 -5.403920833 5.50494E-07 -0.415974645 -0.19228662 -0.415974645 -0.19228662% Total in MSA -0.03443998 0.221092168 -0.15577205 0.876569477 -0.473814545 0.404934584 -0.473814545 0.404934584
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rtreszon Stas:ticsMultiple R 0.643937156
R Square 0.414655061
Adjusted R Square 0.388347424Standard Error 0.239308237Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiRnifran FRegression 4 3.610608529 0.902652132 15.76177482 8.68552E-10Residual 89 5.096890462 0.057268432Total 93 8.707498991
Coeffsicntr Standard Eror tStat P-alse Lower95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.495961528 0.17136725 -2.89414417 0.004780869 -0.83646442 -0.155458637 -0.83646442 -0.155458637NREI WARG 10.97774262 2.319502944 4.732799605 8.29177E-06 6.368942172 15.58654306 6.368942172 15.58654306WAEG 6.822002339 3.039158435 2.244701119 0.027266035 0.783262537 12.86074214 0.783262537 12.86074214WASG 2.09593434 4.461961296 0.469733868 0.639694053 -6.769882907 10.96175159 -6.769882907 10.96175159
% D # of Apts -0.321877929 0.049018919 -6.566402022 3.34904E-09 -0.419277424 -0.224478434 -0.419277424 -0.224478434
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 118
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in FFO per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
ReRsion Stamirtr
Multiple R 0.651675271
R Square 0.424680659
Adjusted R Square 0.39199206Standard Error 0.238594192
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F S -nifiwcna F
Regression 5 3.697906412 0.739581282 12.99170578 1.8085E-09Residual 88 5.009592579 0.056927188
Total 93 8.707498991
Caeflerent StandardE r tStat P-svalue Loair95% Upper 95% Loawr95.00/ Upper 95,0%
Intercept -0.427329641 0.179620073 -2.379075087 0.019517894 -0.784287068 -0.070372215 -0.784287068 -0.070372215
NREI WARG 11.56792106 2.361179788 4.899212302 4.34513E-06 6.875568783 16.26027335 6.875568783 16.26027335
WAEG 8.073856409 3.194273344 2.527603476 0.013269833 1.725904469 14.42180835 1.725904469 14.42180835
WASG 5.589548542 5.267789152 1.061080537 0.29155679 -4.879083527 16.05818061 -4.879083527 16.05818061
% D # of Apts -0.337327425 0.050439915 -6.687708075 2.00856E-09 -0.437566233 -0.237088616 -0.437566233 -0.237088616% Total in MSA -0.246353741 0.198937736 -1.238345953 0.218881158 -0.641700993 0.148993511 -0.641700993 0.148993511
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Rctsivn Statirtict
Multiple R 0.456155107
R Square 0.208077482
Adjusted R Square 0.190672591Standard Error 0.264942101Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sifwance F
Regression 2 1.678362381 0.839181191 11.95511582 2.45506E-05Residual 91 6.387682854 0.070194317
Total 93 8.066045235
Coeffictnr Standard Error t Stat P-valwe Lawr 95% ULouwer95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.071104609 0.129748807 0.548017439 0.585021737 -0.186625483 0.3288347 -0.186625483 0.3288347Govt WARG 3.211946457 3.762146514 0.853753687 0.395483292 -4.261096188 10.6849891 -4.261096188 10.6849891
% D # of Apts -0.256357803 0.053342716 -4.805863329 6.05084E-06 -0.362316566 -0.15039904 -0.362316566 -0.15039904
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Rirxrion Statirtic
Multiple R 0.472350075
R Square 0.223114593
Adjusted R Square 0.197218413Standard Error 0.263868503Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiO niasceF
Regression 3 1.799652404 0.599884135 8.615733734 4.35093E-05Residual 90 6.266392832 0.069626587Total 93 8.066045235
Coeffirientr Standard Errr tStat P-vmale Lower 95% Upper 95% Lowr950% Upper9.0%
Intercept 0.23498657 0.179209476 1.311239647 0.193112368 -0.121044047 0.591017186 -0.121044047 0.591017186Govt WARG 3.736731722 3.767939019 0.991717675 0.323994093 -3.748930773 11.22239422 -3.748930773 11.22239422
% D # of Apts -0.274183835 0.054816475 -5.001850867 2.79015E-06 -0.383086243 -0.165281426 -0.383086243 -0.165281426% Total in MSA -0.21845827 0.165517343 -1.319851238 0.190232041 -0.547287097 0.110370557 -0.547287097 0.110370557
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 119
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
R4Rnmnn Staftitrs
Multiple R 0.566517557
R Square 0.320942143
Adjusted R Square 0.306017794Standard Error 0.245336983Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Snifignance FRegression 2 2.588733839 1.29436692 21.50459983 2.2478B-08Residual 91 5.477311396 0.060190235Total 93 8.066045235
Ceefficnt Standarmd rro t Stat P-value Lanaer95% Upper 95% Loawr95.o Upper 95./o .
Intercept -0.134494867 0.083267364 -1.615217059 0.109725752 -0.299895274 0.03090554 -0.299895274 0.03090554NREI WARG 8.197360469 2.050946494 3.996867053 0.000130238 4.123406795 12.27131414 4.123406795 12.27131414
% D # of Apts -0.286935222 0.049964508 -5.742780888 1.21808E-07 -0.38618359 -0.187686855 -0.38618359 -0.187686855
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Reiasen Statitir
Multiple R 0.56893285
R Square 0.323684588
Adjusted R Square 0.301140741Standard Error 0.246197543Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinfcane F
Regression 3 2.610854529 0.870284843 14.35800141 1.00922E-07Residual 90 5.455190706 0.06061323Total 93 8.066045235
Coefficients Standard E r I Stat P-value Lvwer95% Upper95% Lower 95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept -0.047473766 0.16652979 -0.285076719 0.776240357 -0.378313994 0.283366462 -0.378313994 0.283366462NREI WARG 7.970324572 2.092171712 3.809593891 0.000254111 3.813863643 12.1267855 3.813863643 12.1267855
% D # of Apts -0.293828786 0.051421881 -5.714080888 1.41119E-07 -0.395987245 -0.191670327 -0.395987245 -0.191670327% Total in MSA -0.094307449 0.156109878 -0.604109429 0.547290698 -0.40444672 0.215831821 -0.40444672 0.215831821
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
R eysson Stalirics
Multiple R 0.495503148
R Square 0.24552337
Adjusted R Square 0.220374148Standard Error 0.260035097
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sjnifcanew FRegression 3 1.980402605 0.660134202 9.762663001 1.21789E-05Residual 90 6.08564263 0.067618251
Total 93 8.066045235
Ceffsient Standard Error tSta P-value Lowr 95% Upper 95% Lowr 95.0% Upper 95,0%
Intercept 0.228474773 0.111554521 2.048099633 0.043463913 0.006852425 0.45009712 0.006852425 0.45009712WAEG 4.840146013 3.297807127 1.4676862 0.145675609 -1.711518174 11.3918102 -1.711518174 11.3918102WASG -9.431668777 4.308452072 -2.189108436 0.031176579 -17.99115393 -0.872183624 -17.99115393 -0.872183624
% D # of Apts -0.275491938 0.053042087 -5.193836681 1.27113E-06 -0.380869217 -0.170114659 -0.380869217 -0.170114659
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 120
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Ragmsion StatuitsMultiple R 0.485615925
R Square 0.235822827
Adjusted R Square 0.219027724Standard Error 0.260259542
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Si£nifancr FRegression 2 1.902157586 0.951078793 14.04116608 4.8454E-06
Residual 91 6.163887649 0.067735029
Total 93 8.066045235
Cocfficns Standard En t Stat P-vale Lonr95% Upper 95% Lo)e r 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.117540483 0.042573496 2.760883966 0.006971971 0.032973454 0.202107511 0.032973454 0.202107511WAED 6.167237613 3.060997424 2.014780399 0.046879037 0.086941642 12.24753358 0.086941642 12.24753358
% D # of Apts -0.269039883 0.052747365 -5.100536886 1.83651E-06 -0.373816055 -0.164263711 -0.373816055 -0.164263711
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
RParsion StatutrexMultiple R 0.462918193
R Square 0.214293253
Adjusted R Square 0.197024973
Standard Error 0.263615731Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sginifcanc FRegression 2 1.724773429 0.862386715 12.40964655 1.71535E-05Residual 91 6.323886078 0.069493254
Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffscntr Standard Errr t Stat P-vale Loar 95% Upper95% Lower 95.0% Upper95.0%/oIntercept 0.091540666 0.12909925 0.70907202 0.480092494 -0.164899161 0.347980492 -0.164899161 0.347980492Govt WARG 3.048631947 3.743312211 0.814420966 0.41753001 -4.386998665 10.48426256 -4.386998665 10.48426256
% D # ofApts -0.260412086 0.053075668 -4.906430667 4.04444E-06 -0.365840392 -0.154983781 -0.365840392 -0.154983781
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Reession SttisticsMultiple R 0.475681881
R Square 0.226273251
Adjusted R Square 0.20048236Standard Error 0.263047591
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifcanc FRegression 3 1.821196357 0.607065452 8.773378402 3.64542E-05Residual 90 6.227463151 0.069194035Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffcients StandardEmrr tStat P-vale Lowr95% Upper95% Lowr95,0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.237660366 0.178651943 1.330298241 0.186781154 -0.117262616 0.592583347 -0.117262616 0.592583347
Govt WARG 3.516538633 3.756216709 0.936191627 0.351679867 -3.945835466 10.97891273 -3.945835466 10.97891273
% D # of Apts -0.276306053 0.054645938 -5.056296314 2.23583E-06 -0.384869659 -0.167742447 -0.384869659 -0.167742447% Total in MSA -0.194780784 0.165002408 -1.180472376 0.240922897 -0.522586603 0.133025034 -0.522586603 0.133025034
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 121
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
Re, rMiWn ShtirtaMultiple R 0.558184621
R Square 0.311570071
Adjusted R Square 0.296439743Standard Error 0.246757836Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Siniana F
Regression 2 2.507721418 1.253860709 20.59242004 4.1939E-08Residual 91 5.540938089 0.06088943Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffcntr StandaidEramr IStat P-valee Lower9 Uppe95% L % Uer 95 .0%
Intercept -0.09714968 0.083749602 -1.160001699 0.24908253 -0.263507993 0.069208632 -0.263507993 0.069208632NREI WARG 7.611661506 2.062824416 3.68992215 0.000381715 3.514113796 11.70920922 3.514113796 11.70920922% D # of Apts -0.288814202 0.050253874 -5.747103211 1.19547E-07 -0.38863736 -0.188991044 -0.38863736 -0.188991044
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Re-sion Stairtiax
Multiple R 0.55990982
R Square 0.313499007
Adjusted R Square 0.290615641Standard Error 0.247777067Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F SIni*an F
Regression 3 2.523246764 0.841082255 13.69986396 1.94814E-07Residual 90 5.525412744 0.061393475
Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffients Standard Errvr t Stat P-value Lomre 5 Upper 9595/ Loser 95. 0/ Upper 95. 0%
Intercept -0.0242466 0.167598192 -0.14467101 0.88529411 -0.357209392 0.308716193 -0.357209392 0.308716193NREI WARG 7.421459175 2.1055944i2 3.524638521 0.000669006 3.23833173 11.60458662 3.23833173 11.60458662% D # of Apts -0.294589376 0.051751787 -5.692351779 1.54969E-07 -0.397403251 -0.191775502 -0.397403251 -0.191775502% Total in MSA -0.079007315 0.157111429 -0.502874399 0.616280979 -0.39113634 0.233121709 -0.39113634 0.233121709
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Re.rrsion Statirtict
Multiple R 0.49891452
R Square 0.248915698
Adjusted R Square 0.223879555Standard Error 0.259170082
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sknifwnc FRegression 3 2.003437702 0.667812567 9.942254062 1.00064E-05Residual 90 6.045221806 0.067169131Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffirents StandadE r IStat P-valuc Lorr 95% Upper 95% Loaer95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.209244638 0.111183431 1.881976804 0.063070765 -0.011640476 0.430129752 -0.011640476 0.430129752WAEG 5.358168071 3.286836867 1.630189841 0.106556413 -1.171701797 11.88803794 -1.171701797 11.88803794WASG -8.585456962 4.29411987 -1.999351956 0.048586303 -17.11646872 -0.054445209 -17.11646872 -0.054445209% D # of Apts -0.277851091 0.052865641 -5.25579726 9.83289E-07 -0.38287783 -0.172824353 -0.38287783 -0.172824353
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 122
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Reresrion StatirticsMultiple R 0.494077817
R Square 0.244112889
Adjusted R Square 0.227499985Standard Error 0.258564889Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinicane F
Regression 2 1.964781525 0.982390762 14.69417362 2.94979E-06Residual 91 6.083877982 0.066855802Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffients StandardEr tStat P-vale Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.13127116 0.042296283 3.103609806 0.002547457 0.04725478 0.215287539 0.04725478 0.215287539WAED 6.290954033 3.041066064 2.068667336 0.041414218 0.250249267 12.3316588 0.250249267 12.3316588% D # ofApts -0.273316072 0.052403907 -5.215566731 1.14216E-06 -0.377410005 -0.169222138 -0.377410005 -0.169222138
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rcnsrion Statitics
Multiple R 0.499228891
R Square 0.249229486
Adjusted R Square 0.215486991Standard Error 0.260567579
Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sifnifw-n FRegression 4 2.00596327 0.501490818 7.386219829 3.48757E-05Residual 89 6.042696237 0.067895463Total 93 8.048659507
Ceffsentr Standard Err tStat . P-vale Lower95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.186504563 0.162471683 1.147920418 0.25407762 -0.136323036 0.509332162 -0.136323036 0.509332162Govt WARG 0.754048813 3.909671351 0.19286757 0.847502122 -7.014380673 8.522478299 -7.014380673 8.522478299WAEG 5.150508788 3.475541254 1.481929982 0.141891036 -1.75531391 12.05633148 -1.75531391 12.05633148WASG -8.400437177 4.422571188 -1.899446458 0.060744531 -17.18798716 0.387112808 -17.18798716 0.387112808% D # ofApts -0.277376677 0.053207592 -5.213103393 1.19437E-06 -0.383098972 -0.171654383 -0.383098972 -0.171654383
% Change in NOI per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Remtesion Statistics
Multiple R 0.582775772
R Square 0.339627601
Adjusted R Square 0.309947942Standard Error 0.244377507Observations 94
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinitanc FRegression 4 2.733546919 0.68338673 11.44311017 1.54097E-07Residual 89 5.315112589 0.059720366Total 93 8.048659507
Coeffintr Standard Errvr I Stat P-vale Louer 95% Upper 95% Lowr 950% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.280678488 0.174997326 -1.60390158 0.112278803 -0.628394258 0.067037283 -0.628394258 0.067037283NREI WARG 8.281923159 2.368637017 3.496493172 0.000737587 3.57549441 12.98835191 3.57549441 12.98835191WAEG 5.929327553 3.103536984 1.910506491 0.059287623 -0.237330986 12.09598609 -0.237330986 12.09598609WASG -1.278795909 4.556479104 -0.2806544 0.779626859 -10.33241793 7.774826108 -10.33241793 7.774826108% D # ofApts -0.293829943 0.050057288 -5.869873423 7.36604E-08 -0.393292653 -0.194367232 -0.393292653 -0.194367232
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 123
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Retsmiion Stattic
Multiple R 0.284662581
R Square 0.081032785
Adjusted R Square 0.060611292Standard Error 0.762736123Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Srnfiwnar FRegression 2 4.616915106 2.308457553 3.968014613 0.022310063Residual 90 52.35897546 0.581766394Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffient S tStat P-ale Lowr 95% Upper95% Lor95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.801646175 0.373565581 2.145931574 0.034569701 0.059493544 1.543798806 0.059493544 1.543798806Govt WARG -15.08132014 10.83240791 -1.392240789 0.167280093 -36.60177183 6.439131553 -36.60177183 6.439131553
% D # Apts -0.379261172 0.154118634 -2.460839175 0.015769403 -0.685444491 -0.073077852 -0.685444491 -0.073077852
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Rovnsirrn StatisMultiple R 0.311739907R Square 0.09718177
Adjusted R Square 0.066749694Standard Error 0.760240003
Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifwan- F
Regression 3 5.537017869 1.845672623 3.193399366 0.027370663Residual 89 51.4388727 0.577964862
Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffints Standard Enr t Stat P-value Loaer 95% Upper95% Lower 95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept 0.348778534 0.517171716 0.674395995 0.501807599 '0.678830093 1.376387161 -0.678830093 1.376387161Govt WARG -16.51048694 10.85621079 -1.520833305 0.131846633 -38.08153485 5.060560965 -38.08153485 5.060560965
% D # Apts -0.331520359 0.158205622 -2.09550302 0.038966492 -0.645871391 -0.017169328 -0.645871391 -0.017169328% Total in MSA 0.604507195 0.479108664 1.261732964 0.210341671 -0.347471 1.55648539 -0.347471 1.55648539
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
ReResjion StatistisMultiple R 0.292739102
R Square 0.085696182
Adjusted R Square 0.065378319Standard Error 0.760798369Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifwn- FRegression 2 4.882616274 2.441308137 4.217775429 0.017744918Residual 90 52.0932743 0.578814159Total 92 56.97589057
Coefficients Standard Err t Stat P-value Lowr 95% Upper95% Louwr 95,0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept -0.089229329 0.26349678 -0.338635368 0.735673201 -0.612711252 0.434252594 -0.612711252 0.434252594NREI WARG 10.00693098 6.449691844 1.551536293 0.124282749 -2.806497291 22.82035925 -2.806497291 22.82035925% D # Apts -0.410790684 0.155218338 -2.646534478 0.009599047 -0.719158757 -0.102422611 -0.719158757 -0.102422611
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 124
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Ression Statidis
Multiple R 0.324361935
R Square 0.105210665
Adjusted R Square 0.075049226
Standard Error 0.75685199Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinificana F
Regression 3 5.994471321 1.998157107 3.488250918 0.019007536
Residual 89 50.98141925 0.572824935
Total 92 56.97589057
Coff Snd ntr ss d Stat P-vale Loer 95% Upper95% Lower 95.0% Upper9.0%
Intercept -0.70259208 0.512383223 -1.371223818 0.173752795 -1.720686079 0.315501919 -1.720686079 0.315501919
NREI WARG 11.51636759 6.507066434 1.769824806 0.080181188 -1.413027805 24.44576298 -1.413027805 24.44576298
% D # Apts -0.362697913 0.15822466 -2.29229699 0.024246814 -0.677086772 -0.048309053 -0.677086772 -0.048309053
% Total in MSA 0.670247843 0.481085532 1.393198918 0.167029603 -0.285658344 1.62615403 -0.285658344 1.62615403
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Ression StatisicrMultiple R 0.270225609
R Square 0.07302188
Adjusted R Square 0.041775426Standard Error 0.770345056Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiOnifmac F
Regression 3 4.16048663 1.386828877 2.33696537 0.07904243
Residual 89 52.81540394 0.593431505
Total 92 56.97589057
Cooffsentfs StandardErrr t Stat P-valse Lower95% Upper 95% Loner95.0% Upper95.0%
Intercept -0.017450519 0.330511824 -0.05279847 0.95801081 -0.674170117 0.63926908 -0.674170117 0.63926908
WAEG 2.919357936 9.77066916 0.298787922 0.765798402 -16.49474304 22.33345891 -16.49474304 22.33345891
WASG 10.48385163 12.77597571 0.820591074 0.41407171 -14.90172621 35.86942947 -14.90172621 35.86942947
% D # Apts -0.357484294 0.157599922 -2.268302482 0.025729948 -0.670631813 -0.044336776 -0.670631813 -0.044336776
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Rerssion Statirties
Multiple R 0.247700793
R Square 0.061355683
Adjusted R Square 0.04049692Standard Error 0.770858799
Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F StiniFRanc F
Regression 2 3.495794679 1.74789734 2.941482396 0.057882526
Residual 90 53.48009589 0.594223288Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffientsr StandasEdr IStat P-lc Loner 95% Upper 95% Loner95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.305666265 0.126680741 2.41288663 0.017854518 0.053993066 0.557339464 0.053993066 0.557339464
WAED -0.950974032 9.066529657 -0.104888427 0.916697748 -18.96320318 17.06125511 -18.96320318 17.06125511
% D # Apts -0.375550171 0.156777232 -2.395438202 0.018672124 -0.687015257 -0.064085086 -0.687015257 -0.064085086
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 125
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Regrrion StatitirMultiple R 0.308032069
R Square 0.094883755
Adjusted R Square 0.053742108Standard Error 0.765519759
Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sirnifwance F
Regression 4 5.40608647 1.351521617 2.306270198 0.064400989Residual 88 51.5698041 0.586020501Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffient-r StandErr I Stat P-valse Laxer 95% Upper 95% Lower95.00
/o Upper 95.00%Intercept 0.487789421 0.477462202 1.021629394 0.309756716 -0.461067107 1.436645948 -0.461067107 1.436645948Govt WARG -16.74902059 11.48832067 -1.457917225. 0.148423039 -39.57966143 6.081620255 -39.57966143 6.081620255WAEG 7.527960758 10.21108363 0.737234267 0.462941052 -12.76443791 27.82035943 -12.76443791 27.82035943WASG 6.358535096 13.00744955 0.48883796 0.626172515 -19.4910575 32.20812769 -19.4910575 32.20812769% D # Apts -0.367685177 0.156768966 -2.345395187 0.021255556 -0.679230794 -0.056139561 -0.679230794 -0.056139561
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
RcrtWnen StatirticrMultiple R 0.316705279
R Square 0.100302234
Adjusted R Square 0.048595465Standard Error 0.767598745
Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinificanr FRegression 5 5.714809081 1.142961816 1.939827938 0.095832298Residual 87 51.26108149 0.589207833
Total 92 56.97589057
Coefficint Standard Ervr IStat P-value Lwr95V% Upper 95% La r 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.325517215 0.528645553 0.615757029 0.539662493 -0.725223826 1.376258256 -0.725223826 1.376258256Govt WARG -17.76950716 11.60546794 -1.531132329 0.129364941 -40.83664806 5.297633739 -40.83664806 5.297633739WAED -0.605635836 15.27345928 -0.039652827 0.968460764 -30.96331199 29.75204031 -30.96331199 29.75204031WAEG 6.167958617 16.52446567 0.373262212 0.709861247 -26.67622999 39.01214723 -26.67622999 39.01214723% D # Apts -0.342379154 0.161035383 -2.126111346 0.036327081 -0.662454647 -0.022303662 -0.662454647 -0.022303662% Total in MSA 0.458639346 0.633609011 0.723852309 0.471098331 -0.800728085 1.718006776 -0.800728085 1.718006776
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
R.r.rsion Staitic
Multiple R 0.363660325
R Square 0.132248832
Adjusted R Square 0.092805597Standard Error 0.749552105Observations 93
ANOVA
d¥ SS MS F Sinian-e~ FRegression 4 7.534994994 1.883748748 3.352890111 0.013277201Residual 88 49.44089558 0,561828359Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffientr Standard Errr t Sta P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lar95, 0% Upper95.0%Intercept -1.082686755 0.540688153 -2.002423669 0.048317696 -2.157191671 -0.008181839 -2.157191671 -0.008181839NREI WARG 18.03903464 7.360543208 2.450774913 0.016232981 3.411490434 32.66657884 3.411490434 32.66657884WAEG 4.108420261 9.519314099 0.431587845 0.667096531 -14.80923076 23.02607128 -14.80923076 23.02607128WASG 26.18094234 13.98414731 1.872187254 0.064501954 -1.609633313 53.971518 -1.609633313 53.971518% D # Apts -0.387597908 0.153837524 -2.519527739 0.013556643 -0.693317896 -0.081877921 -0.693317896 -0.081877921
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 126
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in N.I. per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
RErmstrion Satitics
Multiple R 0.363665818R Square 0.132252827
Adjusted R Square 0.0823823Standard Error 0.753845833Observations 93
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifancr FRegression 5 7.535222624 1.507044525 2.651923591 0.027978548Residual 87 49.44066794 0.56828354Total 92 56.97589057
Coeffientx Standad Enr t Stat P-Wdce Lover 95% Upper95% Lorr95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -1.08606074 0.569317415 -1.907654167 0.05973484 -2.217641568 0.045520089 -2.217641568 0.045520089NREI WARG 18.00587515 7.585850022 2.373613385 0.019816298 2.928165899 33.08358439 2.928165899 33.08358439WAED -26.00013739 16.71572125 -1.555430185 0.123474072 -59.22446743 7.224192661 -59.22446743 7.224192661WAEG 30.04432644 18.74850731 1.602491652 0.112671677 -7.220388936 67.30904182 -7.220388936 67.30904182% D # Apts -0.386826446 0.159448133 -2.426033085 0.017330005 -0.703747105 -0.069905787 -0.703747105 -0.069905787% Total in MSA 0.012667418 0.632929077 0.020013962 0.984078065 -1.245348568 1.270683404 -1.245348568 1.270683404
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Rernion Statistis
Multiple R 0.322700136
R Square 0.104135377
Adjusted R Square 0.083774818Standard Error 0.337051972Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifancr FRegression 2 1.162070099 0.58103505 5.114563623 0.007918903Residual 88 9.997154817 0.113604032Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffientts Standard E r Stat P- e Loer 95% Upper95-/o Loer 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.309827468 0.167909159 1.845208867 0.068370533 -0.023856958 0.643511895 -0.023856958 0.643511895GOVT WARG -3.395374461 4.85525935 -0.699318866 0.486197135 -13.0441896 6.253440681 -13.0441896 6.253440681% D # Apts -0.332003899 0.105641918 -3.142728818 0.00228132 -0.541945174 -0.122062625 -0.541945174 -0.122062625
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Resrnon Statistrr
Multiple R 0.326902145
R Square 0.106865013
Adjusted R Square 0.076067254Standard Error 0.338466695Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SOnifanr FRegression 3 1.192530711 0.397510237 3.469895825 0.019540472Residual 87 9.966694205 0.114559704Total 90 11.15922492
Coe9tintis Sanrd Error t Stat P-wale Lower 95% Upper 95% Laer 95.0% Upper 95, 0%Intercept 0.391312642 0.231089794 1.693335894 0.093969407 -0.068003678 0.850628963 -0.068003678 0.850628963GOVT WARG -3.075956624 4.914831495 -0.625851899 0.533050558 -12.84472348 6.692810235 -12.84472348 6.692810235% D # Apts -0.340559461 0.107374987 -3.171683376 0.002094049 -0.553979029 -0.127139893 -0.553979029 -0.127139893% Total in MSA -0.111028021 0.215317451 -0.515648037 0.607408176 -0.538995081 0.316939039 -0.538995081 0.316939039
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 127
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
Regsrion StisfisMultiple R 0.614585298
R Square 0.377715088
Adjusted R Square 0.363572249
Standard Error 0.280912015Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifwann FRegression 2 4.215007624 2.107503812 26.7071619 8.62041E-10Residual 88 6.944217292 0.07891156Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffiiens Standand Err tStat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept -0.378333748 0.097873352 -3.865543992 0.000211715 -0.572836619 -0.183830877 -0.572836619 -0.183830877NREI WARG 14.95491561 2.382753848 6.276315796 1.27086E-08 10.21968939 19.69014184 10.21968939 19.69014184
% D # Apts -0.390543176 0.08853155 -4.411344598 2.89914E-05 -0.566481165 -0.214605188 -0.566481165 -0.214605188
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Retression StatirticsMultiple R 0.61529226
R Square 0.378584566
Adjusted R Square 0.357156447Standard Error 0.282324396
Observations 91
ANOVA
edf SS MS F Snificanc FRegression 3 4.224710317 1.408236772 17.66765322 4.83523E-09Residual 87 6.934514599 0.079707064
Total 90 11.15922492
Coefficents StandardErnr tStat P-Male L.0mr95% Upper 95% Loer 95, 0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.436250889 0.192955759 -2.260885564 0.026261082 -0.81977163 -0.052730148 -0.81977163 -0.052730148NREI WARG 15.09914383 2.43015146 6.213252167 1.73416E-08 10.26895116 19.92933649 10.26895116 19.92933649
% D # Apts -0.386137562 0.089868213 -4.296709015 4.50009E-05 -0.564760496 -0.207514628 -0.564760496 -0.207514628% Total in MSA 0.063082423 0.180805083 0.348897398 0.728009319 -0.296287518 0.422452364 -0.296287518 0.422452364
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rc,-msion StatiticsMultiple R 0.41513231
R Square 0.172334835
Adjusted R Square 0.143794657Standard Error 0.325825243Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Stnificnce FRegression 3 1.923123185 0.641041062 6.03832374 0.00087514Residual 87 9.236101731 0.106162089
Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffsants StandardErrr t Stat P-vae Lower95% Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.283191322 0.14101794 2.008193577 0.047724589 0.002902693 0.563479952 0.002902693 0.563479952WAEG 7.281688197 4.150871027 1.754255468 0.082907917 -0.968623408 15.5319998 -0.968623408 15.5319998WASG -14.54571228 5.447183114 -2.670318214 0.009042494 -25.37258639 -3.718838173 -25.37258639 -3.718838173
% D # Apts -0.385110904 0.104062784 -3.700755328 0.000376194 -0.591947105 -0.178274702 -0.591947105 -0.178274702
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 128
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
ReRnrsion StaticsMultiple R 0.393599278R Square 0.154920392
Adjusted R Square 0.135714037Standard Error 0.327359155Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifsance FRegression 2 1.728791495 0.864395748 8.066100717 0.000607429Residual 88 9.430433421 0.107164016Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffentr Standani Ervr tStat Pvalue Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95. 0o Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.107202864 0.054720147 1.959111404 0.053265606 -0.001542013 0.215947742 -0.001542013 0.215947742WAED 9.346012126 3.878450257 2.409728501 0.018047317 1.638401292 17.05362296 1.638401292 17.05362296% D # Apts -0.368159929 0.103792166 -3.547087821 0.000627026 -0.574425208 -0.16189465 -0.574425208 -0.16189465
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Regmrsion Statistics
Multiple R 0.442360989R Square 0.195683245
Adjusted R Square 0.158273163Standard Error 0.323058631Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifwance FRegression 4 2.183673341 0.545918335 5.230762303 0.000807528Residual 86 8.975551575 0.104366879Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffient Standard Errr tStat P-value Loer95% Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.519922825 0.204934344 2.537021451 0.012984411 0.112527165 0.927318486 0.112527165 0.927318486GOVT WARG -7.772905536 4.919478518 -1.580026319 0.117772034 -17.55249722 2.006686145 -17.55249722 2.006686145WAEG 9.39823206 4.328140652 2.171424825 0.03265308 0.794180195 18.00228392 0.794180195 18.00228392WASG -16.49672728 5.540286978 -2.977594364 0.003773529 -27.51044433 -5.483010228 -27.51044433 -5.483010228% D # Apts -0.398989103 0.103552368 -3.85301765 0.00022418 -0.604844231 -0.193133975 -0.604844231 -0.193133975
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Refsion StatirtinMultiple R 0.44580177
R Square 0.198739218
Adjusted R Square 0.151606231Standard Error 0.324335507Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinfiance FRegression 5 2.217775634 0.443555127 4.216563176 0.001796645Residual 85 8.941449282 0.105193521Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffwcjnt Standard Eror tStat P-wlre Lower95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0/oIntercept 0.468568779 0.224645677 2.08581258 0.039993691 0.02191272 0.915224838 0.02191272 0.915224838GOVT WARG -8.214835806 4.999539458 -1.643118506 0.104052765 -18.15526565 1.725594038 -18.15526565 1.725594038WAEG 8.744150962 4.494536165 1.945506865 0.05501911 -0.192196435 17.68049836 -0.192196435 17.68049836WASG -18.47887689 6.56180002 -2.816129238 0.006041126 -31.52550114 -5.43225264 -31.52550114 -5.43225264% D # Apts -0.393546427 0.104400198 -3.769594651 0.000301068 -0.601122115 -0.185970739 -0.601122115 -0.185970739% Total in MSA 0.155515781 0.273134883 0.569373562 0.57060427 -0.387549868 0.69858143 -0.387549868 0.69858143
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 129
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rensiomn Stadres
Multiple K 0.64788819
K Square 0.419759106
Adjusted R Square 0.392771158
Standard Error 0.274392323Observations 91
ANOVA
df Ss MS F Sinifzwce F
Regression 4 4.684186279 1.17104657 15.55357592 1.3033E-09
Residual 86 6.475038637 0.075291147Total 90 11.15922492
Coeffinntft Standad Eevr tStat Pvalue Loner95% Upper95% LonUer 95 .00%%
Intercept -0.683278441 0.198932827 -3.434719398 0.000915124 -1.078743492 -0.28781339 -1.078743492 -0.28781339
NREI WARG 16.32760045 2.69622515 6.055725893 3.56565E-08 10.9676866 21.6875143 10.9676866 21.6875143
WAEG 8.2878593 3.499584612 2.368240868 0.020114465 1.330920992 15,24479761 1.330920992 15.24479761WASG -0.231480915 5.16050795 -0.044856227 0.964325899 -10.49022286 10.02726103 -10.49022286 10.02726103% D # Apts -0.402150335 0.087681185 -4.586506616 1.5208E-05 -0.57645462 -0.22784605 -0.57645462 -0.22784605
% Change in Market Cap per Unit v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Regrmsion Satti
Multiple R 0.652811749
R Square 0.426163179
Adjusted R Square 0.392408072
Standard Error 0.274474346Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sivifane FRegression 5 4.755650767 0.951130153 12.6251467 3.55372E-09
Residual 85 6.403574149 0.075336166Total 90 11.15922492
Coeflfcientr Standard E"r IStat P-lsae Lower 95% Upper95% Loner95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept -0.623194336 0.20833534 -2.991303995 0,003634222 -1.037421057 -0.208967615 -1.037421057 -0.208967615NREI WARG 16,91738672 2.76417615 6.12022744 2.7763E-08 11.42146068 22.41331276 11.42146068 22.41331276
WAEG 9.459242717 3.70147159 2.55553568 0.012381849 2.099721112 16.81876432 2.099721112 16.81876432
WASG 3.028170039 6.152050918 0.492221225 0.623831891 -9.203762732 15,26010281 -9.203762732 15.26010281
% D # Apts -0.411899466 0,088276735 -4.666002507 1.13361E-05 - -0.587417371 -0.236381562 -0.587417371 -0,236381562% Total in MSA -0.227934357 0.234027237 -0.97396508 0.332837524 -0.693243482 0.237374768 -0.693243482 0.237374768
Cap Rate v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Repsrnon Sttri
Multiple R 0.504894105R Square 0,254918058
Adjusted R Square 0.237984377Standard Error 0.012759118
Observations 91
ANOVA
df Ss MS F S~.mfcansn FRegression 2 0.004901404 0.002450702 15.05390736 2.3822E-06Residual 88 0.014325967 0.000162795
Total 90 0.019227372
Coefficients Standard Err I Sat P-value Lower95% Upper 95% Lowr 95, 0% Upper 95 0%Intercept 0.086865278 0.006356209 13.66620908 1.79048E-23 0.074233639 0.099496918 0.074233639 0.099496918GOVT WARG -0.255112205 0.183796063 -1.38801779 0.168635822 -0.620368539 0.11014413 -0.620368539 0,11014413% D # Apts -0,02140471 0.00399908 -5.352409116 6.8264E-07 -0.029352046 -0.013457374 -0.029352046 -0.013457374
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 130
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
Cap Rate v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
etmssion StatistiwMultiple R 0.535215534R Square 0.286455668Adjusted R Square 0.261850691Standard Error 0.012557721Observations 91
ANOVAdf SS MS F Sienificane F
Regression 3 0.00550779 0.00183593 11.64218393 1.73557E-06Residual 87 0.013719582 0.000157696Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffwientr Standard Enmr IStat P-alue Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Upper 95.0/%Intercept 0.098362255 0.008573845 11.47236187 4.27516E-19 0.081320797 0.115403713 0.081320797 0.115403713GOVT WARG -0.210044628 0.18234905 -1.151882214 0.252525035 -0.572483373 0.152394117 -0.572483373 0.152394117% D # Apts -0.022611839 0.003983804 -5.675941109 1.78331E-07 -0.030530087 -0.01469359 -0.030530087 -0.01469359% Total in MSA -0.015665261 0.007988663 -1.960936523 0.05308523 -0.031543606 0.000213083 -0.031543606 0.000213083
Cap Rate v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
ReRnxsion StattisMultiple R 0.573717449R Square 0.329151711Adjusted R Square 0.313905159Standard Error 0.012106839Observations 91
ANOVAdf SS MS F Sirnificance F
Regression 2 0.006328722 0.003164361 21.58859989 2.35218E-08Residual 88 0.012898649 0.000146576Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffiients Standard Entror tat P-alue Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95.0% Uppr 950%Intercept 0.09191178 0.004218178 21.78944896 3.21242E-37 0.083529031 0.100294529 0.083529031 0.100294529NREI WARG -0.353918291 0.102692718 -3.446381593 0.000873082 -0.557998646 -0.149837937 -0.557998646 -0.149837937% D # Apts -0.019773058 0.003815562 -5.182213579 1.3804E-06 -0.027355692 -0.012190424 -0.027355692 -0.012190424
Cap Rate v. WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Rerersion StatisticsMultiple R 0.624650742R Square 0.39018855Adjusted R Square 0.369160569Standard Error 0.011609088Observations 91
ANOVAdf SS MS F Signi/cance F
Regression 3 0.0075023 0.002500767 18.55568296 2.16022E-09Residual 87 0.011725071 0.000134771Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffients Standard Enr t Stat P-Value Lower 95% Upper95% Lower95,0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.112054446 0.007934279 14.12282686 3.12334E-24 0.096284196 0.127824696 0.096284196 0.127824696NREI WARG -0.404078584 0.099927048 -4.043735848 0.000113397 -0.602694556 -0.205462613 -0.602694556 -0.205462613% D # Apts -0.021305261 0.003695352 -5.765421246 1.21648E-07 -0.028650179 -0.013960344 -0.028650179 -0.013960344% Total in MSA -0.021939069 0.007434647 -2.950922838 0.004070648 -0.036716246 -0.007161893 -0.036716246 -0.007161893
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 131
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
Cap Rate v. WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rternion StatiticsMultiple R 0.55460087
R Square 0.307582125
Adjusted R Square 0.283705647Standard Error 0.012370421Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiRnificane FRegression 3 0.005913996 0.001971332 12.88222324 4.85306E-07Residual 87 0.013313376 0.000153027
Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffientr Standard Enmr tStat P-tae Lower95%/ Upper 95% Lower 95.0/ Uppr 95.0%Intercept 0.086159225 0.005353948 16.09265408 8.18324E-28 0.075517667 0.096800783 0.075517667 0.096800783WAEG -0.461353746 0.157593747 -2.927487644 0.004360079 -0.774588609 -0.148118883 -0.774588609 -0.148118883WASG 0.300877623 0.206810086 1.454849848 0.149309464 -0.110180115 0.711935361 -0.110180115 0.711935361
% D # Apts -0.019872647 0.003950892 -5.02991381 2.61031E-06 -0.027725479 -0.012019816 -0.027725479 -0.012019816
Cap Rate v. WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Reresion StatiticrMultiple R 0.55013577
R Square 0.302649365
Adjusted R Square 0.286800487Standard Error 0.012343668
Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SuniFnc F
Regression 2 0.005819152 0.002909576 19.09594887 1.29376E-07Residual 88 0.01340822 0.000152366Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffcientr StandardEmr t Stat P-vale Lowr95% Upper 95% Loer95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.082271305 0.002063322 39.87322812 4.05247E-58 0.078170883 0.086371727 0.078170883 0.086371727WAED -0.4157489 0.146243967 -2.842844791 0.005557572 -0.706378278 -0.125119522 -0.706378278 -0.125119522
% D # Apts -0.019498168 0.003913671 -4.982066267 3.11618E-06 -0.027275773 -0.011720563 -0.027275773 -0.011720563
Cap Rate v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
RcXrrion StatitirMultiple R 0.556591388
R Square 0.309793973
Adjusted R Square 0.277691367Standard Error 0.012422246Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinicance FRegression 4 0.005956524 0.001489131 9.650119185 1.70633E-06Residual 86 0.013270848 0.000154312Total 90 0.019227372
Coeffcients StandardE ror t Stat P-value Louwr 95% Upper95% Lowr 95 00
Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.089183686 0.007880132 11.31753675 1.02282E-18 0.073518514 0.104848858 0.073518514 0.104848858GOVT WARG -0.099305956 0.189163712 -0.524973604 0.600952306 -0.475350665 0.276738753 -0.475350665 0.276738753WAEG -0.434312968 0.166425598 -2.609652445 0.010688874 -0.765155839 -0.103470098 -0.765155839 -0.103470098WASG 0.275951627 0.21303503 1.295334516 0.198671209 -0.147547652 0.699450906 -0.147547652 0.699450906% D # Apts -0.020049954 0.003981794 -5.035407066 2.59545E-06 -0.027965492 -0.012134416 -0.027965492 -0.012134416
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 132
Appendix 13Panel Data Results
Cap Rate v. WARG (Govt), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
Rearon StatirtirMultiple R 0.586691167
R Square 0.344206525
Adjusted R Square 0.305630438
Standard Error 0.012179629
Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiROWran FRegression 5 0.006618187 0,001323637 8.92279529 7.65312E-07Residual 85 0.012609185 0.000148343Total 90 0.019227372
Ceeffwi-rt StandardEror i Stat P-vdale Lower95% Upper95% Lower95 0% Upper 95. 0%Intercept 0.096336901 0.00843602 11.4197096 7.55544E-19 0.079563823 0.113109979 0.079563823 0.113109979GOVT WARG -0.037748543 0.187745505 -0.201062301 0.841130209 -0.41103713 0.335540043 -0.41103713 0.335540043WAEG -0.343204613 0.168781338 -2.033421492 0.045128797 -0.678787334 -0.007621893 -0.678787334 -0.007621893WASG 0.552049486 0.246412388 2,240347943 0.027676696 0.062115348 1.041983624 0.062115348 1.041983624% D # Apts -0.020808076 0.003920495 -5.307512875 8.72448E-07 -0.028603074 -0.013013078 -0.028603074 -0.013013078% Total in MSA -0.021662126 0.010256914 -2.111953531 0.037625506 -0.042055631 -0.001268621 -0.042055631 -0.001268621
Cap Rate v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rctrnion StairMultiple R 0.653072652R Square 0.426503889Adjusted R Square 0.399829651
Standard Error 0.011323377Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F SW7ificanc FRegression 4 0.008200549 0.002050137 15.9893562 8.00312E-10Residual 86 0.011026823 0.000128219Total 90 0.019227372
Ceffsdert Standanilrd r tStat P-vasc Lower95% Upper95% Lower 95,0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.113971771 0.008209382 13.88311188 1.12506E-23 0.097652072 0.130291469 0.097652072 0.130291469NREI WARG -0.469866875 0.11126541 -4.22293753 5.96653E-05 -0.691055009 -0.24867874 -0.691055009 -0.24867874WAEG -0.490308795 0.14441773 -3.395073408 0.001040101 -0.777401508 -0.203216083 -0.777401508 -0.203216083WASG -0.111049603 0.21295923 -0.52145945 0.603387072 -0.534398197 0.312298991 -0.534398197 0.312298991% D # Apts -0.019382296 0.003618349 -5.356668746 6.97873E-07 -0.026575329 -0.012189262 -0.026575329 -0.012189262
Cap Rate v. WARG (NREI), WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts, % in MSA
RP.rion StatirtzrMultiple R 0.663625179
R Square 0.440398379
Adjusted R Square 0.407480636Standard Error 0.01125097Observations 91
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sienifanc FRegression 5 0.008467703 0.001693541 13.37875402 1.28032E-09Residual 85 0.010759668 0.000126584Total 90 0.019227372
Coefsacentr Standard Errvr Stat P-vawe Lower95%5 Upper 95% Lwer95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.117645403 0.008539868 13.77602096 2.27842E-23 0.100665847 0.134624959 0.100665847 0.134624959NREI WARG -0.433806455 0.113306268 -3.828618329 0.00024567 -0.659089808 -0.208523103 -0.659089808 -0.208523103WAEG -0.418688651 0.15172692 -2.759488241 0.007088851 -0.720362598 -0.117014704 -0.720362598 -0.117014704WASG 0.088250361 0.252178549 0.349951893 0.727240439 -0.413148458 0.589649179 -0.413148458 0.589649179% D # Apts -0.019978372 0.003618549 -5.521100107 3.59398E-07 -0.027173022 -0.012783723 -0.027173022 -0.012783723% Total in MSA -0.01393625 0.009593004 -1.452751349 0.149974549 -0.033009723 0.005137224 -0.033009723 0.005137224
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 133
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt)
Resrar/aon Smtsrfe#Multiple R 0.270408318RSquare 0.073120659Adjusted R Square 0.018598345Standard Error 0.147623186Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sipnoanc FRegression 1 0.029226375 0.029226375 1.341114364 0.262848895Residual 17 0.370474284 0.021792605Total 18 0.399700659
Co ffinent StondardE-rrr IStat P-value LUpper 95% Lai 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.20125835 0.270816791 -0.743153146 0.46753559 -0.772632632 0.370115932 -0.772632632 0.370115932Govt WARG Average 9.286894726 8.019321326 1.158064922 0.262848895 -7.632417961 26.20620741 -7.632417961 26.20620741
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Ruerr.ion StatiuigrMultiple R 0.362853286R Square 0.131662507Adjusted R Square 0.023120321Standard Error 0.147282693Observations 19
ANOVA
lf SS MS F SiniinreF,, Regression 2 0.052625591 0.026312795 1.213007691 0.323227591Residual 16 0.347075068 0.021692192Total 18 0.399700659
Caffianst Standard Error t Stt P-vale Lawar 95% Upper 95% Lowr 95, 0% Upper 95 0%Intercept -0.210638815 0.270343066 -0.779153754 0.447260935 -0.783740384 0.362462754 -0.783740384 0.362462754Govt WARG Average 10.70474952 8.116455692 1.318894592 0.205770501 -6.50136403 27.91086307 -6.50136403 27.91086307% D # ofApts -0.155548667 0.149767425 -1.038601464 0.314431946 -0.473041352 0.161944019 -0.473041352 0.161944019
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WARG (NREI)
RArarion StatirtirMultiple R 0.513385622R Square 0.263564797Adjusted R Square 0.22024508Standard Error 0.131586169Observations 19
ANOVA
dl SS MS F SignifaneFRegression 1 0.105347023 0.105347023 6.084176231 0.024567585Residual 17 0.294353636 0.01731492Total 18 0.399700659
Coaeentzr SoandSardError Sat P-valu La 95% Upper 95% Lwr 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.210967524 0.133542346 -1.579779968 0.132582792 -0.49271764 0.070782593 -0.49271764 0.070782593NREI WARG Average 8.240655189 3.340879795 2.466612298 0.024567585 1.192005111 15.28930527 1.192005111 15.28930527
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 134
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WARG (NREI), % Change in # of Apts
Rererion StatirtarMultiple R 0.576240525RSquare 0.332053143Adjusted RSquare 0.248559785Standard Error 0.129174978Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F SinifnneFRegression 2 0.13272186 0.06636093 3.977000733 0.039621899Residual 16 0.266978799 0.016686175Total 18 0.399700659
Cffodirienrs StandrEr-r tStot P-cvl Loer 95/. Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.191331416 0.131988661 -1.449604953 0.166486883 -0.471134815 0.088471982 -0.471134815 0.088471982NREI WARG Average 8.78919347 3.30750466 2.657348779 0.017209189 1.777598398 15.80078854 1.777598398 15.80078854% D # ofApts -0.16725581 0.130582157 -1.280847346 0.218502764 -0.444077554 0.109565935 -0.444077554 0.109565935
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG
IRrernior StatirtarMultiple R 0.173441244RSquare 0.030081865Adjusted R Square -0.091157902Standard Error 0.155659267Observations 19
ANOVA
If SS MS F Si fnwae FRegression 2 0.012023741 0.006011871 0.248118798 0.78321435Residual 16 0.387676918 0.024229807Total 18 0.399700659
Cosie-r St-anrdError tStat P-value Lonr 95/t Uppr 95% L-r 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.059817946 0.160522648 0.3726449 0.714302968 -0.28047479 0.400110682 -0.28047479 0.400110682WAEG Average 3.629329955 5.352729219 0.678033543 0.507438337 -7.71794652 14.97660643 -7.71794652 14.97660643WASG Average -3.049901723 6.245320129 -0.488349942 0.631927312 -16.28938597 10.18958252 -16.28938597 10.18958252
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG, % Change in # of Apts
Rgrrion StatrticrMultiple R 0.26760386R Square 0.071611826Adjusted R Square -0.114065809Standard Error 0.157284745Observations 19
ANOVA
d SS MS F Sienifxan FRegression 3 0.028623294 0.009541098 0.385678253 0.764898055Residual 15 0.371077365 0.024738491Total 18 0.399700659
Coeffriaer SlmdardError St P-vale LoaWr 95% Upper 9% Lor 95, 0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.111902631 0.1742166 0.642318996 0.53036148 -0.259431489 0.483236752 -0.259431489 0.483236752WAEG Average 3.571548514 5.409085267 0.660286969 0.519081377 -7.957650907 15.10074794 -7.957650907 15.10074794WASG Average -3.913123631 6.397920524 -0.611624295 0.549944687 -17.54997681 9.723729545 -17.54997681 9.723729545% D # of Apts -0.131623637 0.160683876 -0.819146517 0.425526819 -0.474113422 0.210866148 -0.474113422 0.210866148
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 135
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WAED
Rerrien StlbrtiarMultiple R 0.171808896R Square 0.029518297Adjusted R Square -0.027568862Standard Error 0.151055536Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sipifirac FRegression 1 0.011798483 0.011798483 0.517074196 0.481860831Residual 17 0.387902177 0.022817775Total 18 0.399700659
CaJiaWrtr Stard Error I Stl P-vale Lr 95% UPPtr 95% Laer 95.0%/ Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.074072327 0.060694575 1.220411013 0.238968074 -0.053982211 0.202126865 -0.053982211 0.202126865WAED Average 3.422665778 4.759792934 0.719078713 0.481860831 -6.619633525 13.46496508 -6.619633525 13.46496508
Average % Change in FFO per Unit v. Average WAED, % Change in # of Apts
Raresion Statir.rMultiple R 0.267249826RSquare 0.07142247Adjusted R Square -0.044649722Standard Error 0.152305829Observations 19
ANOVA
Idf 55 MS F Siifaa FRegression 2 0.028547608 0.014273804 0.615328003 0.552771144Residual 16 0.371153051 0.023197066Total 18 0.399700659
CoaSffitr StandardError tStat P-vale Loaer 95% Uppr 95% Ler 95.0% Uppr95.0%/oIntrcept 0.103137841 0.070107746 1.471133324 0.160648767 -0.045483907 0.25175959 -0.045483907 0.25175959WAED Average 3.69004969 4.809494928 0.767242662 0.454110955 -6.505621793 13.88572117 -6.505621793 13.88572117%D # of Apt. -0.130005457 0.152996692 -0.849727242 0.408012163 -0.454343883 0.194332968 -0.454343883 0.194332968
Average % Change in NOI per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt)
Rercan StatirtaaMultiple R 0.283767761R Square 0.080524142Adjusted R Square 0.026437327Standard Error 0.124522762Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS P Signf-anm FRegression 1 0.023085123 0.023085123 1.488794306 0.239060181Residual 17 0.26360061 0.015505918Total 18 0.286685733
Coefaier StandardError It Stat P-lr L r 95% Upper 95% Lmer 95. 0% Uppr 95. 0%Intercept -0.147821514 0.228438741 -0.647094765 0.5262126 -0.629785802 0.334142775 -0.629785802 0.334142775Govt WARG Average 8.253708694 6.764439039 1.22016159 0.239060181 -6.018030097 22.52544749 -6.018030097 22.52544749
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 136
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in NOI per Unit v. Average WARG (NREI)
Rgrrion StairtrcMultiple R 0.538951447R Square 0.290468663Adjusted R Squre 0.248731525Standard Error 0.109386662Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F SisnifaceFRegression 1 0.083273221 0.083273221 6.959477341 0.017262697Residual 17 0.203412511 0.011965442Total 18 0.286685733
cGausr1 StAndardError I Slat P-vae Loer 95% Uppr 95%/ Lwer 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept -0.15655753 0.111012819 -1.410265334 0.176496367 -0.390774432 0.077659372 -0.390774432 0.077659372NREI WARG Average 7.326613651 2.777250018 2.638082133 0.017262697 1.467120117 13.18610718 1.467120117 13.18610718
Average % Change in NOI per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG
Rerrn SaIt/drtMultiple R 0.235408377R Square 0.055417104Adjusted R Square -0.062655758Standard Error 0.130095743Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Siniran FRegression 2 0.015887293 0.007943647 0.469346665 0.633753862Residual 16 0.27079844 0.016924902Total 18 0.286685733
Cfw-nr StandardErrr I Slat P-vala, Le 9ow5 Upper 9595 Ler 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.119838155 0.134160424 0.893245203 0.38496456 -0.164569175 0.404245485 -0.164569175 0.404245485WAEG Average 3.380864725 4.473664185 0.755726086 0.46079538 -6.102877546 12864607 -6.102877546 12.864607WASG Average -4.651235809 5.219667171 -0.891098159 0.386080848 -15.71643341 6.413961789 -15.71643341 6.413961789
Average % Change in NOI per Unit v. Average WAED
Rsiruion StatintsaMultiple R 0.227244775R Square 0.051640188Adjusted R Square -0.004145683Standard Error 0.126463486Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sini/can FRegression 1 0.014804505 0.014804505 0.925685783 0.349473155Residual 17 0.271881227 0.015993013Total 18 0.286685733
Cosicir StandrdErrvr tSeat P-va Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.088586048 0.050813414 1.743359496 0.099326585 -0.018621034 0.19579313 -0.018621034 0.19579313WAED Average 3.833966903 3.984892065 0.962125659 0.349473155 -4.573432193 12.241366 -4.573432193 12.241366
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 137
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt)
Rorernso StatuisaMultiple R 0.301797926RSquare 0.091081988Adjusted R Square 0.037616223Standard Error 0.122732905Observations 19
ANOVAdf SS MS F S gniarn F
Regression 1 0.025661305 0.025661305 1.703557171 0.209213911Residual 17 0.256077221 0.015063366Total 18 0.281738526
tContir Sled.rd Error tStmt P-vale, Lower 95% Upper 95% Lo r95.0% Upper 95.0%/Intercept -0.17702669 0.225155224 -0.786242872 0.442547627 -0.652063351 0.298009972 -0.652063351 0.298009972Govt WARG Average 8.702066787 6.667208789 1.305203881 0.209213911 -5.364533821 22.7686674 -5.364533821 22.7686674
Average % Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Average WARG (NREI)
Rewtr/on StaarrMultiple K 0.608622001RSquare 0.37042074Adjusted R Square 0.333386666Standard Error 0.102146588Observations 19
ANOVA
df Ss MS F SinifismreP FRegression 1 0.104361793 0.104361793 10.00216015 0.005686736Residual 17 0.177376732 0.010433925Total 18 0.281738526
Coof-ieotr StandardError tSt P-vle. Lower 95% Upper95/ Lower95.0% Upper95.0%Interept -0.204826822 0.103665113 -1.97585105 0.064632747 -0.423541398 0.013887753 -0.423541398 0.013887753NREI WARG Average 8.202030397 2.593429655 3.162619191 0.005686736 2.73036447 13.67369632 2.73036447 13.67369632
Average % Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG
Ratorusion StatitticrMultiple R 0.255236092RSquare 0.065145463Adjusted RSquare -0.051711354Standard Error 0.128302508Observations 19
ANOVAdf SS MS F Sipyfrec F
Regression 2 0.018353987 0.009176993 0.557481065 0.583381054Residual 16 0.263384539 0.016461534Total 18 0.281738526
Co~ffesos St-ndardError Stat P-volvo Lower95% Upper 95% Lowr95.0%/ Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.151724899 0.132311162 1.146727886 0.268354209 -0.128762171 0.432211968 -0.128762171 0.432211968WAEG Average 2.42714929 4.41199936 0.550124579 0.589831963 -6.925869421 11.780168 -6.925869421 11.780168WASG Average -5,426829758 5.147719469 -1.054220183 0.307442501 -16.33950507 5.485845558 -16.33950507 5.485845558
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 138
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in Rental Revenue per Unit v. Average WAED
Rrana StautriaMultiple R 0.209086703RSquare 0.043717249Adjusted R Square -0.012534677Standard Error 0.12589017Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signfrasnr FRegression 1 0.012316833 0.012316833 0.777168927 0.390302876Residual 17 0.269421692 0.015848335Total 18 0.281738526
Coeff-eatrE S-ndrd Eor Stat P-velo Lower 95% UPPr 95 Lar 95 0/% Upper 95, 0%Intercept 0.077930448 0.050583054 1.5406434 0.141810769 -0.028790616 0.184651511 -0.028790616 0.184651511WAED Average 3.497042783 3.966826733 0.88157185 0.390302876 -4.872241742 11.86632731 -4.872241742 11.86632731
Average % Change in N.I. per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt)
Rgrraion StatlrtimMultiple R 0.234998443R. Square 0.055224268Adjusted R Square -0.000350775Standard Error 0.326334636Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F S ificranc FRegression 1 0.105822131 0.105822131 0.993688264 0.332820877Residual 17 1.810403009 0.106494295Total 18 1.91622514
Coi SanrError t tdard Error iSat P-vae Lwr 95%/ Upper 95%/ Lowr95.0/ Upper95.0%Intercept 0.798859056 0.59871335 1.334293039 0.199706708 -0.464317461 2.062035573 -0.464317461 2.062035573GOVT WARG Average -17.67738152 17.73343449 -0.996839137 0.332820877 -55.0917101 19.73694705 -55.0917101 19.73694705
Average % Change in N.I. pet Unit v. Average WARG (NREI)
Rgrn.on Statirtr
Multiple R 0.033839653RSquare 0.001145122Adjusted R Square -0.057611047Standard Error 0.335544406Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F SiifmaneFRegression 1 0.002194312 0.002194312 0.019489394 0.890613153Residual 17 1.914030828 0.112590049Total 18 1.91622514
Coeffimentr StandardError tStat P-vae Lower 95/ Uppfr 95% Ler 95.0% Uper 95.0%Intercept 0.159774465 0.344991893 0.463125275 0.649148257 -0.568095821 0.887644751 -0.568095821 0.887644751NREI WARG Average 1.203963559 8.624107824 0.139604419 0.890613153 -16.99133889 19.399266 -16.99133889 19.399266
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 139
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in N.I. per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG
Re-rerr/on StatcrMultiple R 0.279037984R Square 0.077862197Adjusted R Square -0.037405029Stndard Error 0.332323604Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinifane FRegression 2 0.149201499 0.074600749 0.675492937 0.522837358Residual 16 1.767023641 0.110438978Total 18 1.91622514
Coesffimatr SdnadardError tStat P-valuP Loer 95%/o Upper95% r95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept -0.004145431 0.336323909 -0.012325711 0.990318138 -0.717120107 0.708829245 -0.717120107 0.708829245WAEG Average -3.290064574 11.20083517 -0.293733862 0.772737315 -27.03476905 20.4546399 -27.03476905 20.4546399WASG Average 15.04294674 13.34829145 1.126956719 0.276379146 -13.25416065 43.34005414 -13.25416065 43.34005414
Average % Change in N.I. per Unit v. Average WAED
Rrerrion StatiriaMultiple R 0.167225451R Square 0.027964352Adjusted R Square -0.029214216Standard Error 0.331009076Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sigifan FRegression 1 0.053585994 0.053585994 0.489070517 0.493800694Residual 17 1.862639146 0.109567009Total 18 1.91622514
Cewffieir Stad-rdError tSta P-ahlue Lover 95%/. Uppr 95% Ler 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.283076383 0.132992694 2.128510786 0.048217367 0.002485934 0.563666832 0.002485934 0.563666832WAED Average -7.224761778 10.33089126 -0.699335769 0.493800694 -29.02106752 14.57154397 -29.02106752 14.57154397
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 140
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average Cap Rate v. Average WARG (Govt)
Renrio$n StatrtirMultiple R 0.355632017RK Square 0.126474131Adjusted RSquare 0.075090257Standard Error 0.010892044Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Signifcans FRegression 1 0.000292007 0.000292007 2.461358401 0.135102536Residual 17 0.002016823 0.000118637Total 18 0.00230883
Coosdaotrl StaonrdError t Stat P-vota Lawr 95% Upper 95% l. -r 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept 0.105971853 0.020208369 5.243958791 6.59863E-05 0.063335862 0.148607843 0.063335862 0.148607843GOVT WARG Average -0.941081951 0.599846344 -1.568871697 0.135102536 -2206648879 0.324484977 -2.206648879 0.324484977
Average Cap Rate v. Average WARG (NREI)
Rorrion SthrstriaMultiple R 0.386267765R Square 0.149202786Adjusted R Square 0.099155891Standard Error 0.010749408Observations 19
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinfian FRegression 1 0.000344484 0.000344484 2.981259601 0.102358805Residual 17 0.001964346 0.00011555Total 18 0.00230883
Coffaitr StandardError tStoa P-Nvso Lwer 95% Upper95% Lwer95.0o Uppr95.0%Intercept 0.09299432 0.010985321 8.465325746 1.67624E-07 0.069817286 0.116171353 0.069817286 0.116171353NREI WARG Average -0.475919969 0.275634789 -1.726632445 0.102358805 -1.057459352 0.105619414 -1.057459352 0.105619414
Average Cap Rate v. Average WAEG, WASG
R4rrerrian StatirticrMultiple R 0.241675076RSquare 0058406843Adjusted R Square -0.059292302Standard Error 0.011656485Observations 19
ANOVA
sdf SS MS F SinfcnrsceFRegression 2 0.000134851 6.74257E-05 0.496238462 0.617883148Residual 16 0.002173978 0.000135874Total 18 0.00230883
Coeffri Standard.Error tStat P-vale Loler 95% Uppr 95% Lower 95.0% Uper95.0%Intercept 0.079440532 0.011800826 6.731777257 4.81842E-06 0.054423904 0.104457161 0.054423904 0.104457161WAEG Average -0.375495616 0.392403034 -0.956913131 0.352847695 -1.207352699 0.456361467 -1.207352699 0.456361467WASG Averaage 0.327664464 0.466498037 0.702391946 0.492527778 -0.661266973 1.316595902 -0.661266973 1.316595902
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 141
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average Cap Rate v. Average WAED
R mrrnon StarMultiple R 0.240248842R Square 0.057719506Adjusted R Square 0.002291242Standard Error 0,011312579Observations 19
ANOVAdf Ss s MF Simfaim F
Regression 1 0.000133265 0.000133265 1.041337065 0.321814175Residual 17 0.002175565 0.000127974Total 18 0.00230883
caffi-etr Sadar.d Brew tSt P-v Low 95% Upper 95%/ Lonr 95 0% Uppr 95.0%/Intercept 0.078267986 0.004504596 17.37513814 Z94276E-12 0.068764105 0.087771867 0.068764105 0.087771867WAED Average -0.359349973 0.352145346 -1.020459242 0.321814175 -1.102312748 0.383612801 -1.102312748 0.383612801
Average % Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Average WARG (Govt)
Rarcrion StatirtaicMultiple R 0.3563642R Square 0.126995443Adjusted R Square 0.075642234Standard Error 0.153610234Observations 19
ANOVAdf s s F Si.pifwan.e F
Regression 1 0.058352685 0.058352685 2.472979686 0.134243526Residual 17 0.401133765 0.023596104Total 18 0.459486451
Caeffinssnt Standard Error I Sta P-va4e Lowr 95 Upper 95% Loer 95.0% Upper 950%C-Oid-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~pe 9A U ppr 95, 0%Intercept -0.322095968 0.284998132 -1.130168698 0.274099255 -0.923390306 0.279198371 -0.923390306 0.279198371GOVT WARG Average 13.3033509 8.459618382 1.572571043 0.134243526 -4.544908668 31.15161047 -4.544908668 31.15161047
Average % Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Average WARG (NREI)
R orersion StatuittMultiple R 0.77175068R Square 0.595599111Adjusted R Square 0.571810824Standard Error 0.104548533Observations 19
ANOVA
If Ss MS F Sipsisn FRegression 1 0.273669722 0.273669722 25.03749417 0.000108722Residual 17 0.185816729 0.010930396Total 18 0.459486451
Cafli-m# Standard Error t Sta P-vae Lower 95% Upper 95% Low 95.0% Uper 95.0%/Intercept -0.398326012 0.10684302 -3.72814258 0.001672446 -0.623745395 -0.172906629 -0.623745395 -0.172906629NRBI WARG Average 13.41414104 2.680818659 5.003748012 0.000108722 7.758100169 19.0701819 7.758100169 19.0701819
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 142
Appendix 14Cross-Section Panel Data Results
Average % Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Average WAEG, WASG
Rgrarion SatiriaMultiple R 0.297199433RSquare 0.088327503Adjusted R Square -0.025631559Standard Error 0.161806435Observations 19
ANOVA
d/ SS MS F Significane FRegression 2 0.040585291 0.020292645 0.775080991 0.477211419Residual 16 0.41890116 0.026181322Total 18 0.459486451
Coesimtr StadrdError tSat P-valr Lamr 95% Upper95% Lo. 95.0% Upper95.0%/%Intercept 0.207047354 0.163810062 1.263947717 0.224353623 -0.140214386 0.554309094 -0.140214386 0.554309094WAEG Average 2.672184248 5.447039472 0.490575525 0.630386542 -8.875020986 14.21938948 -8.875020986 14.21938948WASG Average -8.02561996 6.475569766 -1.239368928 0.233081136 -21.75321152 5.701971602 -21.75321152 5.701971602
Average % Change in Market Cap per Unit v. Average WAED
Reerrion StairtiaMultiple R 0.212280385R Square 0.045062962Adjusted RSquare -0.011109805Standard Error 0.160656856Observations 19
ANOVA
sdf SS MS F Sinifan FRegression 1 0.02070582 0.02070582 0.802220799 0.382937659Residual 17 0.43878063 0.025810625Total 18 0.459486451
Coeffsiatr Standard Error t Stat P-vaL La- r 95% Upr 95% LIcr 95,0/ Uppr 95.0/Intercept 0.075811703 0.063972533 1.185066462 0.252293758 -0.059158732 0.210782139 -0.059158732 0.210782139WABD Average 4.479263043 5.001031707 0.895667795 0.382937659 -6.072006293 15.03053238 -6.072006293 15.03053238
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 143
Appendix 15% of Portfolio in MSA with Rent Data (Govt and/or NREI)
REIT Tnkr.. YuI Asodnted Eset' Reiy Coportidon AEC 1996
1997199819992000
2 Apartment Inrtment & Mgmt Co. AIV 19961997199819992000
3 Ali Reidentil Ptoprties Trust AML 19961997199819992000
4 Achstone Communitie Tust ASN 1996199719919992000
5 AvalonBy Communities Inc AVB 19961997199819992000
6 BRE Properdi , In. BRE 19961997199819992000
7 Cmden Pp.t Tru st CPT 19961997199819992000
B Equiy Rnsidntil Prpeties Tust EQR 19961997199819992000
9 EtProperqTrut, Inc ESS 19961997199819992000
10 Gable ResidenEil Tust GBP 1996199719981992000
11 Home Propcrtie oFNe York, Inc. HME 19961997199819992000
12 MiAmuic Ap tment Communities. Inc MAA 19961997199819992000
13 Pt Propneti, lne PPS 19961997199819992000
14 Robcrts Realt Instor Inc. RPI 19961997199819992000
15 Summit P:pdi Inc. SMT 19961997199819992000
16 Chles E. Smith Ridentil Relty SRW 19961997199819992000
17 Cornston Rlty IncomeTrust TCR 19961997199819992000
18 Ton nd Couny Tst, The TCT 19961997199819992000
19 United Dominion Rly Trut, Inc. UDR 19961997199819992000
% Toto i MSAw/Rent BD
72.79%71.27%76.18%70.65%71.25%74.92%77.73%68.70%67.76%65.69%95.60%A95.90%i96.47%%96.72%98.58%.80.166%81.86%84.83%89.73%92.27%78.72%84.42%81.14%81.92%82.17'98.65%.16%928%96.53%96.96%89.84%91.19'h91.38%91.61%.91.00%78.62%7624%77.84%B0.12%h82.11%8621%88.64%87.55%A87.36%88.89%96.86%9726%98.01%97,79%100.00%8.66%39.14%4521%56.75S%60.65%5821%N.76%52.76%
5121%51.08%95.81%9627%A96.61%97.20'100.00%88.72%1000n100.00%100.00%100.09%A
7e.6s%80.88%82.44%92.06'%94.48%
100.00'100.00%10.9O100.00%51.9%61.18%62.58%64.01%7127%76.77%76.77%78.56%75.3P/81.53%61.82'%63.58%63.84%69.6070.52'%
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 144
# REIT Ticker3 Amli Residential Properties Trust AML4 Archstone Communities Trust ASN6 BRE Properties, Inc. BRE7 Camden Property Trust CPT9 Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS10 Gables Residential Trust GBP13 Post Properties, Inc. PPS14 Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. RPI15 Summit Properties Inc. SMT16 Charles E. Smith Residential Realty SRW
* 10 Apartment REITs with the greatest percent portfolio concentration in MSA with Govt Rent Data
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance
Appendix 1610-REIT Index
5 YearAverage
Govt MSA*96.65%85.77%96.91%91.00%87.73%97.99%97.18%97.74%85.71%
100.00%
145
Appendix 1710-REIT Data Results
% Change in FFO per Unit (10 REITs) v. WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Regnssion StarstarsMultiple R 0.654180838R Square 0.427952569
Adjusted R Square 0.403080942Standard Error 0.239910432
Observations 49
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sgnfianae FRegression 2 1.980704533 0.990352267 17.20645625 2.63595E-06Residual 46 2.647622706 0.057557015Total 48 4.628327239
Coeffentr Standard Enrr tStat P-valre LoAger 95% Upper 95% L Law 95.0% Upper95.0%Intercept 0.402014989 0.15673632 2.564912766 0.013647723 0.086521441 0.717508537 0.086521441 0.717508537Govt WARG -3.903298981 4.464599183 -0.874277582 0.386508899 -12.89006243 5.083464472 -12.89006243' 5.083464472%D # of Apts -0.909623826 0.160902375 -5.653265388 9.5519E-07 -1.233503198 -0.585744454 -1.233503198 -0.585744454
Average % Change in FFO per Unit (10 REITs) v. Average WARG (Govt), % Change in # of Apts
Rf,mssion Statirfcs
Multiple R 0.680057482R Square 0.462478178Adjusted R Square 0.308900515Standard Error 0.119307024Observations 10
ANOVA
df SS MS F Sinfwanm F
Regression 2 0.085728497 0.042864248 3.011363555 0.113863977Residual 7 0.099639161 0.014234166Total 9 0.185367658
Cefzieant Standard Etnr t Stat P-Vale Loaer95% Upper 95%/ Loar 95.0% Upper 95.0%/o
Intercept 0.003049407 0.307369022 0.009920995 0.992361147 -0.723762316 0.729861129 -0.723762316 0.729861129ovt WARG Average 9.755105589 9.140374128 1.067254519 0.321275692 -11.85842928 31.36864046 -11.85842928 31.36864046% D # of Apts Average -1.333045114 0.553766607 -2.407232751 0.046964489 -2.642494126 -0.023596101 -2.642494126 -0.023596101
The Correlation Between Market Fundamentals and Apartment REIT Performance 146