Post on 23-Mar-2023
universitätsverlag karlsruhe
Analysis of AsymmetricCommunication Patternsin Computer MediatedCommunication Environments
Bettina Hoser
Hoser // 28.02.05
Bettina Hoser
Analysis of Asymmetric Communication Patterns
in Computer Mediated Communication Environments
Analysis of Asymmetric Communication Patterns in Computer Mediated Communication Environments
vonBettina Hoser
Dissertation, genehmigt von der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
der Universität Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe, 2004
Referenten: Prof. Dr. Andreas Geyer-Schulz, Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Waldmann
Impressum
Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe c/o Universitätsbibliothek Straße am Forum 2 D-76131 Karlsruhe www.uvka.de � Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe 2005 Print on Demand ISBN 3-937300-49-X
Acknowledgement
To DorisHoser.
But fromtheSage it is sohard at anyprice to get a singlewordThatwhenhis taskis accomplished,his workdone,Throughoutthecountryeveryonesays:“It happenedof its ownaccord”.(Lao-zi,TheDaoDe Jing)
i
Contents
1 Intr oduction 11.1 Motivation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.2 Guideto theReader. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 RelatedWork 72.1 SocialNetwork Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.2 DegreebasedMeasurements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.3 EigensystemAnalysisin SocialNetwork Analysis. . . . . . . . . 102.4 OtherApplicationsof EigenvectorCentrality . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3 Theoretical Foundationsfor Pattern Analysis in SocialNetworks 153.1 SocialNetworks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153.2 RankandStatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.1 DegreebasedRank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183.2.2 RankPrestigeor Statusindex andeigenvectorcentrality . 213.2.3 CommunicationPatterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.3 LinearOperatorsin Hilbert Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233.3.1 Complex NumbersandHermitianMatrices . . . . . . . . 233.3.2 Hilbert SpaceasaspecialVectorSpace . . . . . . . . . . 263.3.3 HermitianOperatorsin Hilbert Space . . . . . . . . . . . 293.3.4 Eigensystemanalysisof HermitianOperators. . . . . . . 303.3.5 OrthogonalProjectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353.3.6 PerturbationTheoryfor HermitianOperators . . . . . . . 36
3.4 Eigensystemof realadjacency matricesfor non-directionalgraphs 37
4 Analysis of GeneralBidir ectional Communication Patterns 414.1 CommunicationBehavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414.2 Complex HermitianAdjacency Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424.3 Interpretationof theEigensystem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.3.1 Eigenspectrum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
iii
iv CONTENTS
4.3.2 Eigenvectorsandorthogonalprojectors . . . . . . . . . . 464.4 Examplesof Eigensystems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
4.4.1 StarGraph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484.4.2 CompleteGraph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614.4.3 Two subgroupsconnectedby onelink . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
5 Data sets 675.1 EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675.2 Subsetof EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
6 Resultsand Discussion 796.1 EIESDataSet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
6.1.1 Eigensystemof theEIESDataSet . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806.1.2 Comparisonwith dichotomizedandsymmetrisizedeigen-
system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916.2 Subsetof EIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
6.2.1 Eigensystemof theEIESSubset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036.2.2 Comparisonof subsetresultswith dichotomizedandsym-
metriziedeigensystem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
7 Conclusionand Future Applications 1177.1 FutureApplications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
7.1.1 Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1187.1.2 OrganizationAnalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1207.1.3 Viral Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
7.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Appendix 123
Notation
�setof realnumbers�setof complex numbers�matrix: capitalletters����� matrixentryin thek-th row andl-th column�vectorspace:boldcapitalletters vector:bold letters��� : l-th componentof vector ���eigenvalue:greekletters ��������������graph
with vertices��� � , edges��� � andadjacency matrix
�� �"!$# innerproductof vectors and !� %�� absolutevalueof %& & normof vector &(')&normof matrix
�
v
Chapter 1
Intr oduction
Many predictionsabout the waysnew technologieswill transformsocietyfadequickly - the telegraph, radio, movies,and television did createrevolutions,butnot the oneswe expected. Hence, it is especiallyimportant that we turn fromopinionsandpredictionsto theseriousanalysisanddescriptionof onlinegroups.(M. SmithandP. Kollock, 1999) [SK99,p.23]
As peopletransferpartof their sociallife to theInternet(seefor exampleon-line communitieslikefriendster[Fri04], linkedin[Lin04], orkut [Ork04], . . . ), thequestionarisesif theuseof computermediatedcommunication(CMC) changestheway communitiesarebuilt andkeptalive,or if theknown dynamicsof sociallife arejust beingadaptedto thenew technology [Wel02]. Onefocusof interestis thenotionof a centerof a network. Thequestionis how theway peoplebuildgroupsaroundcertain“very importantpeople”is transferedto CMC. Not only isthis questionof interestto the sociologist(seefor example [Wel01]), but it hasbecomeincreasinglyinterestingfor securityreasonson theonehand,andfor itspossibleeconomicimpacton theother.
Someapplicationshave gainedwide publicity, e.g. thehunt for terroristnet-works, or the useof network dynamicsfor political goals. Sincethe terroristattackson New York on september11th,2001the ideaof usingmethodsdrawnfrom socialnetwork analysishave gaineda wide interest[Kre02]. For the sui-cideattackonNew York theterroristshadusedmoderncommunicationchannels,e.g.emailandmobilephones,to planandexecutetheir dreadfulattack.Thusin-terestin thedevelopmentandenhancementof methodsto detectcommunicationpatternsof suchnetworkswell in advancehasgrown dramatically.
In the 2004 U.S. presidentialelectionsthe campaignusedthe possibilitiesof the Internet to reachout to communitiesby “snowballing ” (see [Ker04],
1
2 CHAPTER1
[Bus04]). The aim is to motivatepeopleto participatein the elections,and tousethesocialnetworksof supportersto win overevenmorepotentialvoters.
In the world of economicsHayek [Hay45, p.519-520]points to one of themajor problemswhich researcherstry to solve by using network analysis. Heexplicitly states,thatthepeculiarcharacterof theproblemof a rationaleconomicorder is determinedpreciselyby thefact that theknowledge of thecircumstancesof which we mustmake usenever exists in concentratedor integratedform, butsolelyasthedispersedbitsof incompleteandfrequentlycontradictoryknowledgewhich all the separate individualspossess. Thuscommunicationis at the heartof economicsuccess,aswell as the efficient allocationof informationwithin anetwork. To know thepatternsof suchcommunicationoffersthepossibilityto actaccordingto theneedsof theorganization.Hayek´sexampleis anillustrationthattheknowledgegainedaboutsocialnetworksandhow they areanalyzedmight beusefulin understandingeconomicprocesseslikemarkets.
Thuson the businesssidethe opportunityto view customer, employee,sup-plier or traderbehavior via theiruseof new mediabecomesevermoreinteresting,temptingandrevealing.Theavailability of hugedatasets,e.g. emailserver dataor market log files, hasopenedthe possibility to analyzebehavior without thedrawbackof having to explicitly askthe observed subjectsabouttheir behavior.Thediscussionaboutprivacy in thiscontext andthelegalaspectsof theuseof datawithout theexplicit consentof theobservedsubjectsis still on going. The legalsystemsof Germany andtheUnitedStatesfor examplehavedifferentapproachesto privacy, which hastheeffect, thatwhile in Germany emailsin a company en-vironmentfall understrict laws protectingthe privacy of the author, this is notthecasein theU.S.Thusdatalike this is not easilyaccessiblein Germany. Mes-sagespostedto newsgroupsor any otheropencommunicationplattform arenotprotectedby law neitherin the U.S. nor in Germany. The scientificcommunitythoughtendsto eitheraskpermissionof any suchgroupbeforeusingthedata,orafterwards.
Thewayemail,for examplein anorganization,is beingusedcanrevealif theorganizationalstructureof thecompany is reflectedin thegroupsthatcanbede-tectedoutof theCMC [KH93]. On thecustomersideon theotherhandtheanal-ysis of customernewsgroupsor chatroomscouldhelp identify thosecustomerswho canswingopinions,andthushelp in marketingefforts. An applicationhereis for exampleviral marketing. Anotherexampleof a network is givenwhenonelooks at supplychainmanagement.Herea network of suppliershasto performthe difficult taskof bringing partsandcomponentstogetherat the right time, intherequiredamountto themanufacturer. In this context informationalefficiencyplaysa major role to cut costsor to stayon budget. If onenow looks at evenlargerstructures,onecansee,thatinformationefficiency is highly correlatedwithefficient markets.And theseagaincanbeviewedassocialnetworksin thesense,
CHAPTER1 3
thatagentsinteractvia communicationto tradegoodsor information.As canbeseenfrom thesefew examplestheimpactof CMC on communities
and social interactionis strong. Consequentlythe interestof researchers,andsubsequently, theuseof their resultsfor businessapplications,is growing rapidly.
Thereare many different anglesfrom which theseinteractionscan be ana-lyzed. Theonethatwill bein thefocusin thecourseof this bookis thequestionof centralityof a memberwithin his or hersocialnetwork. Centralitycharacter-izesthefact,thatamemberplaysaveryimportantrolewithin agivennetwork andwith respectto theinteractionobserved.Themethodsthathavebeendevelopedinsuchuntil now unrelatedfieldsassociology, computerscience,psychology, math-ematics,operationsresearch,physics,andsignalintelligencehave beenbroughttogetherto yield insight into subjectbehavior in the Internetageby analyzingcommunicationstructuresanddynamicsin virtual communitiesusingCMC.
1.1 Moti vation
It´s whoyouknow. Really.(D. Gross,2004) [Gro04]
To find structurein “uncharted”communitieshasbeenof interestfor sociol-ogistsandintelligenceserviceresearchersfor many yearsand,dueto the effecttheInternethasonmarketingit hasgainedgrowing interestin thebusinessworld.Theinterestof sociologistsis to find out,whois “important” within acommunity,who“leads”,whocorrespondswith whom,thusputtingthefocusonrelationshipswithin a groupin a sociologicalsense.The interestof intelligenceservicesis toidentify the links within a communicationnetwork, that, if shutdown, mostef-fectively hurt the targetednetwork. Lastly the interestof companieslies on theonehandin the knowledgeaboutthe behavior of their customers,which canbean integral partof customerrelationshipmanagementefforts. On theotherhandthe knowledgeof the existenceof so called“hidden organizations”is of impor-tancefor the businessprocesseswithin the company whenprocessoptimizationis the goal. Thusthe knowledgeof communicationstructurehasbeenof majorimportancefor thesefields.
Makingall communicationstructureswith respectto socialinteractionvisiblehasbeenmadepossibleby applying different methodsto different “views” ofthe communicationof a givencommunity. Someof theseviews are: hierarchy,friendship,communicationwith, etc. Someof theemployedmethodsare: graphtheory, hubsandauthorityalgorithmsandstochasticprocesses.
4 CHAPTER1
But onemajoraspectof communicationhasbeenverydifficult to analyzedueto difficulties which arisefrom the mathematicaltools usedto explain commu-nicationstructurethroughcommunicationbehavior. Communicationis a processbywhich informationis exchangedbetweenindividualsthrougha commonsystemof symbols,signs,or behavior [Dic04]. Thusby definitionit is bilateral.Severalquestionsarisefrom this fact.For onethereis thelargefield of signalprocessing,which looksat theway signalscanbetransmittedfrom onepoint, thesource,toanother, the destination.Whensignalsarecombinedto createmeaningfulmes-sages,the questionof semanticandinformationarise. Informationhasbeenthefocusof mathematicalinformationtheorywhichwasfoundedby Shannonin 1948[SW63].
Communicationin thecourseof thisbookwill beseenasthebilateralprocessof exchangeof messagesbetweento membersof a network. Neither will thequestionbe discussedwhetherthe informationtransmittedhasbeenunderstoodby the recipient,nor will therebe any discussionaboutthe technicalmeasuresof information. The focus will be on the questionhow to identify patternsofcommunicationin a given network if all exchangesare includedin the analysissimultaneously. This hasuntil now posedseveral problemswhen trying to usestandardproceduresasfor exampleeigensystemanalysis. The underlyingdatahadto berepresentedin a realvaluedsocalledadjacency matrix.
Real numberscan only storedataon one communicationdirection insteadof two when looking at bilateral communication. To encodetwo components,datahadto be for exampledichotomizedto representthe dominantdirectionofcommunication.This led to asymmetricmatrices. Thesematricesare difficultto usein eigensystemanalysis,sincetheir spectrumcanyield negative or evenimaginaryeigenvalues,which aredifficult to interpret.
To circumventthis,matricesarebeingpreprocessedin differentwaysto makethemsymmetric,becausein this casetheeigensystemis easierto interpret. Oneway is to multiply thesematriceswith their transposedmatrices,which makesthe resultsymmetric,andthusbetterbehaved. Anothermethodis to usematrixdecompositionfor squarematricesto constructasymmetricmatrix.
Anotherproblemarisesfrom the fact that realvaluedmatricesuseEuclideanspace. Thus distancesare interpretedin a way, that is often inappropriateforthesubject.Especiallyin casesof non-transitivity, wheredistancesin Euclideanspacesuggestthat thereshouldbe transitivity, give rise to somedifficulties ininterpretation.
All thesemethodshave one problemin common. Information is lost or isproneto noise-inducederrors. Anotherproblemis the fact, that someof thesemethodsonly usethe principal eigenpairfor interpretation,thusneglecting theinformation that the rest of the eigensystemmight reveal aboutthe underlyingstructure.
CHAPTER1 5
The objective of this book is to introducea generalizedmethodto analyzecompletelythe structureof an asymmetriccommunicationnetwork, to validatethismethodusingstandarddatasetsandto pointoutsomeapplicationsthatmightbenefitfrom thesefindings.Thedatasetsusedconsistof two way emailcommu-nicationwithin acommunity. Theresultswill beobtainedby usingcomplex Her-mitian adjacency matricesinsteadof realvaluedadjacency matrices.A complexnumbercanstorebothcommunicationdirectionsin onenumber. Theeigensystemof complex Hermitianmatricesyieldsa powerful tool to explain thecommunica-tion structureof a communitybasedon its oftenasymmetriccommunicationpat-ternstructure,dueto themathematicalpropertiesof thisclassof matrices.Severalpointsarenoteworthy, andwill bediscussedin thecourseof thiswork:
* The Hermitian matrix canbe decomposedinto a Fourier sum of its sub-spacesweightedwith therespectiveeigenvalue.
* All eigenvaluesof Hermitianmatricesarerealanddependontheamountofcommunicationwithin thegroup:Thismakesinterpretationof theseeigen-valuesas“energy levels” intuitive.
* Theeigenvaluescanalsobeusedto interprettherelevanceof patternsdueto the fact that they explain the part of the total variancecontainedin asubspace.
* The eigenvaluesare at the sametime also coordinatesin Hilbert space,showing therelevanceof thesubspacein referenceto theoriginalmatrix.
* The eigenvectorsform an orthogonal(e.g. pairwiseindependent)system:all eigenvectorscanbeusedfor interpretationpurposes.
* Theorthogonalprojector, derivedfrom theeigenvector, revealsthesimilar-ity patternbetweendifferentmembersin respectof thesubspacepattern.
* To show stability or instability of a matrix eigensystemwhendisturbancestake place- for exampleflamewars - perturbationtheorycanbe usedtoexplainwhathappensandwhy.
* No ex antenotion hasto be usedor filters appliedto preprocessthe data:No lossof informationhasto beaccepted.
Thesecharacteristicsgive rise to a clearerview on communicationpatternsin substructureswithin virtual communities(VC) basedon the communicationtraffic volumeandcommunicationbehavior within thegroup.
6 CHAPTER1
1.2 Guide to the Reader
In chapter 2 of this booka review of theresearchdonein this field will begivenand the relevant literaturewill be surveyed to introducethe readerto the topicof theuseof eigensystemanalysisin communicationstructureanalysis.A shortexcursionat theendof thatchapterwill show how communicationis analyzedus-ing graph-theoreticalapproachesor toolsusedin physics.Also someapplicationsfrom economicswill bepresented.
After thisintroductionto thefield,chapter3will establishthetheoreticalbasison which this book is grounded. Complex eigensystemanalysisof Hermitianmatriceswill bethemainsubject.
Chapter 4 will presentthe main ideaof this book. The constructionof thecomplex Hermitianadjacency matrix will beexplainedandsomeexamplesof ar-tificially constructedcommunicationpatternswill bediscussedto makethereaderfamiliarwith theapproach.
Chapter 5 describesthe datasetsthat have beenused. In orderto comparetheresultsof theproposedmethodto thosealreadyexisting, theEIES(ElectronicInformationExchangeSystem)datasetof L. andS. Freeman [FF79] hasbeenusedaswell asa subsetthereof [Fre97].
After thattheresultsobtainedwith theproposedmethodwill bepresentedandresultswill bediscussedextensively in chapter6. Heretheeigensystemsgainedfrom the dataareshown andinterpretationswill be given basedon the insightsgainedin chapter4. In additiona comparative interpretationwill begiven,whichpoints out the advantagesof the proposedmethodwith regard to the standardmethods.
Chapter 7 summarizesthe resultsof this book, refers to someinterestingapplicationsandpointsoutproblemsthatmightbeof interestfor furtherresearch.
Chapter 2
RelatedWork
Theaim of this chapteris to provide anoverview of researchdonein thefield ofcommunicationstructureanalysiswith thehelpof eigensystemanalysisof socialnetworks,especiallyin emailnetworks. To achieve that,a shortreview of litera-tureon rank,prestigeandstatusindicesaswell aseigenvectorcentralitywill begiven.Thiswill providethebackgroundfor thegeneralizedapproachfor commu-nicationstructureanalysispresentedin this book.
In section 2.2 degreebasedmeasurementswill be discussed,which give anintuitive introductioninto section 2.3 abouteigensystemanalysis,which startswith rank andprestigeor statusmeasurementsandgoeson to othereigenvectorcentralitymethods.Asasidetrackashortoverview of approachestowardnetworkanalysisfrom aphysicspointof view will begiven.Section2.4will thepointoutsomeapplicationsof themethodsdescribedin theprecedingsections.
2.1 SocialNetwork Analysis
A recentstandardtext bookfor SNA is by WassermanandFaust [WF94]. Socialnetwork analysis(SNA) offersmany toolsto describeand/orevaluaterelationshipwithin a given network or groupof people. It focuseson patternsof relationsamongpeople, organizations,states,etc. [GHW97]. This tool setallows to testtheoriesabouttheconceptsthatdescribetheserelationships.For amoreelaboratedefinition of SNA see [WF94, p.16]. This tool set hasover time grown andbecomemoreelaborate.
Thebasicconcept,thatis investigated,is thatof choice,meaning,thattheun-derlyingsociomatrixis built upfrom thecommunicationchoicesthatthememberswithin a network make. The importanceof choicein an economicalsettinghasfirst beenemphasizedin A. Samuelson´sRevealedPreferenceTheory [Sam48].Choicecanbe interpretedin a broadsense.As early as1984Freeman [Fre84]
7
8 CHAPTER2
showedhow CMC, andthus“choice” of email partners,couldhelp to form andstrengthentieswithin ascientificcommunity. Also GartonandWellman [GW95]give a review on how theuseof electronicmail hasan impacton organizations.In 2001Wellman [Wel01,p.2032]pointsout, thatthefactthatonepersonwritesanemailto anotherpersoncanalsobeseenasa form of choice.
2.2 DegreebasedMeasurements
Theintuitiveexplanationof centralityandprestigeof anetwork memberis basedon thenumberanddirectionof choicesmembersin a network make. In additionto intuitivenessit is alsoeasyto encode.A network canbeviewedasa graph
wherea line/edgeconnectstwo vertices+ and , if thosetwo verticesarerelatedinany sense.If theconnectionhasa direction,thentheedgeis transformedinto anarrow startingat thevertex thatmadethechoiceandendsat thevertex thatwaschosen.
Oneof thefirst to introduceacentralitymeasurewasBavelas [Bav48], whointhefield of psychologytransferedideasfrom topologyto describegroupstructureandpossiblebehavior.
In graphtheoryit is known thatgraphscanbeencodedin socalledadjacencymatrices [Jun99]. The entriesin that matrix areeither - if a connectionexistsbetweentwovertices,or . if it doesnotexist. Thusthismatrixis eithersymmetric,if no directionis apparent,or asymmetric,if thechoicehasaninherentdirection.
A standardapproachfor the measurementof centrality is basedon degreemeasurements(seesection.3.2.1). The degreeis the numberof edges(choicesmade),that go out of (out-degree)or comeinto (in-degree)a vertex of a graph.It focuseson thequestionwho (or which group)canbeseenasmostcentralwithrespectto their in- or out-degreewith respectto their capacityto transferfor ex-amplemessageswithin a network. Thesemeasurementscaneitherbe usedasastandalonecharacterizationof a network, or in conjunctionwith othertools. Ev-erettandBorgatti [EB99] give an overview of thesemeasuresandeven extendit further to helpanalyzegroups.To usethesetools, measurementslike degree,closeness,betweennesscentralityandflow betweennesshave beendefined.Themajordrawbacklies in thefactthateitherin-degreeor out-degreecanbeused,butnotbothsimultaneously.
A branchof thedegreebasedapproachlooksat largenetworksandtheir evo-lution. Erdos andRenyi describedin their 1959 paperon randomgraphshowsuchsystemscanbedescribed.They proposed,thatnetworks(or graphs)arebuiltby the attachmentof new verticesto an existing graph,andthat the probabilitywith which thenew vertex attachesto anexistingvertex is equallydistributed.In1999BarabasiandAlbert found [ALB99], that for real world networks,suchas
CHAPTER2 9
theWorld WideWebor thenervoussystem,theassumptionof equallydistributedattachmentprobability doesnot hold. They found that suchnetworks show ascale-freedegreedistribution in contrastto the distribution expectedby the ran-domgraphtheoryof ErdosandRenyi. Scale-freenetworksaredescribedby thefactthattheprobability /103254 thata vertex is connectedto 2 otherverticesfollowsapowerlaw distribution /603254�782:9�; . Thismeansthatverticeswith almostany de-greecanbefoundin suchanetwork. A specialinterestof thisbranchof researchisin thevulnerabilityof networks,sincein alargescale-freenetwork therearenodesthathaveaveryhighdegreethat,whenattacked,couldcauseacompletenetworkbreakdown. Large in this context meansthat thenumberof nodes/membersin anetworksexceeds-<.>= . As anexamplesee,Ebelet al. [EMB02]. They describeanemailnetwork of size ?A@CB�D � D:-"E nodes.They useemailaddressesasnodesandexchangedmessagesaslinks. For instantmessagingSmith [Smi02] showsalsothescale-freecharacteristicandpointstowardsaspectsof vulnerability.
Basedon degreemeasurementsthereis alsoresearchin thefield of commu-nity analysis.Therehave beentwo approaches.Oneapproachlooks for denselyknit groupswithin a network, which translatesinto high degreecentrality, whilethe other looks for thosememberswho have a high betweennesscentrality(seesection.3.2.1)andthencutthenetwork atthatpoint,repeatingthisprocedureuntilthenetwork decomposes.Seefor example [ADDG F 04].
A slightly differentstandardapproachis basedon themoregraph-theoreticalapproaches,even thoughit is closelyconnectedto the degreemeasurements.Itfocusesmainlyon theidentificationof subgroupswithin agivennetwork/graph.
Recentresearchby Tyler et al. [TWH03] showed that they could identifysubgroupsin emailnetworksby analyzingbetweennesscentralityin the form ofinter-communityedgeswith a largebetweennessvalue.Theseedgesarethenre-moveduntil thegraphdecomposesinto separatecommunities,thusre-organizingthe graphstructure. This is a min-cut-max-flow approachas discussedfor ex-amplein Ford andFulkerson [FF62]. The graphrepresentingthe network wasgeneratedby definingacut-off numberof emailsthatmustbeexchangedbetweenmembers,anda minimum numberof emailsthathadto be exchanged,so thatamemberwasincludedinto the graph. As discussedabove, this could meanlossof informationFor example,it is not possiblelater on to find out who werethereal “lurkers” in that network, sincethe thresholdeliminatedthese.Lurkersarethosenetwork memberswho standat thesidelinesandobserve whathappens.Ina newsgroupthis couldmeanthat thesearemembersthat readall messages,butonly rarelyparticipate,or donotgetanswersto their postings.
10 CHAPTER2
2.3 EigensystemAnalysis in SocialNetwork Analy-sis
Theuseof eigensystemanalysisin SNA startedin thelate1940sandearly1950swhensocial relationshipswere encodedin so calledsociomatriceswhich werecloselyrelatedto adjacency or incidencematricesalreadywell known from graphtheoryat thattime.
In 1953Katz [Kat53] presentedan index basedon this idea,namelythat therank of a groupmemberdependson the rank of the membershe or sheis con-nectedto by choice. Thesechoiceswererepresentedin a binary socalledadja-cency matrix. This index doesnot only take into accountthedirectpathbetweentwo members,but alsolongerpathsthatconnecttwo membersvia othermembers.Statedin mathematicaltermsthisyieldstheeigenvalueequation(for aneigenvalueequalto 1). Thecomponentsof theprincipaleigenvectorarethestatusindicesofeachgroupmember. Thehighestrankedmember, theonewith the largeststatusindex, is theonewho is eitherchosenby few but high rankingco-members,or bymany relatively low rankedco-members.This approachthoughdid not presentasolutionto theproblemthatchoiceneednotbemutual.In 1965Hubbell [Hub65]extendedthis approachbasedon theLeontiefInput-Outputmodelto alsoincludeweightedor unilateralchoices. Thus the ideaof usingeigensystemanalysistodefinetherelevanceof groupmembersby comparingtheir individual statuswiththoseof othermembersthey areconnectedto is in itself nota new idea.
Sincethe early 1950sthe interpretationof the resultsof suchmethodshavebeenenhancedand its applicationsbroadened. Richardsand Seary [RS00],[SR03a] givea verygoodoverview of thedifferentapproachesusedin theeigen-systemanalysisof socialnetworks. Goh et al. [GKK01] show how the largesteigenvaluedependsonsystemsize,andthattheeigenfunction(eigenvector)pointstowardthenodewith thehighestdegree.They useeigensystemanalysisto furtherinvestigatescale-freenetworks,but notasa tool by itself.
Onefinding in thecourseof researchwasthatdistancesin networks(betweenmembers)arevery difficult to describe,sinceit may be the casethat memberGknowsmembersH and + , but themembersH and + haveabsolutelyno knowledgeabouteachother, thusdenying transitivity of the relationof knowing eachother.Transitivity, however, is a key factor in the conceptof distances.This leadstotheassumptionof non-Euclideandistancesin networks.BarnettandRice[BR85]showedthatif thematrix is for exampledefinedasadistancematrix,triads(trian-glesof members)formedbetweenthreenetwork membersneednotbeEuclidean.If sucha matrix is convertedby multi dimensionalscaling(non-linearprincipalcomponentanalysis)into Cartesiancoordinates,eigenvaluesmay becomenega-tive andcomplex eigenspacescanemerge. To avoid this, suchasymmetricbe-
CHAPTER2 11
havior is normallyexcludedby designingthematrix in sucha way thatdistancesaredichotomized.But this evidentlymeanslossof information.BarnettandRiceshow thatthesenegativeeigenvalues
�JI . yield information,for exampleaboutthe homogeneityof the structureof the group. For this purposethey definethewarp astheratio of therealvariance(all positiveeigenvalues)andthetotal vari-ance(all eigenvalues). If this warp equals - , then the spaceis Euclidean. Thelargerit gets,themorenon-Euclideanthespacebecomes,whichmeans,thatmoreandmoreinteractionis donethroughlessandlessnodes.Thusthey founda wayto interpretthenegativeeigenvaluesthathadbeenaproblemin thefield.
Multi dimensionalscalingis alsothestartingpoint of Chino[Chi98], He wasthefirst to introducetheuseof Hilbert spacetheoryin theanalysisof preferencedatain psychology. He foundthatwith thehelpof Hilbert spacetheoryasymmet-ric relationshipsbetweensubjectscouldbebetterdescribed.Theinterpretationofnegative eigenvalueshasalsobeendiscussedin his work. He proposesthat thesigngivesahint on symmetricandasymmetricrelationsbetweensubjects.
Eigensystemanalysishasthusbeenpushedconsiderablytowardsthe expla-nationof negative eigenvalues.On the otherhandtherewereproblems,alreadydiscussedby Katz,aboutthegeneralquestionof whatstatusis supposedto mean,andwhereit comesfrom.
BonacichandLloyd [BL01] presentanintroductionof theuseof eigenvector-like measurementsof centralityfor unpreprocessedasymmetricdatathat broad-enstheeigensysteminterpretationin thatdirection.For asymmetricrelationstheyshow thatfor somenetworksthestandardeigenvectormeasuresfor network cen-trality do not leadto meaningfulresults. As a solution they suggestthe notionof K -centralitywhich combinesanindividual’sown inherentstatuswith a weightK for therelative importanceof theperceivedstatusanda vector � of exogenoussourcesof status.In their conclusionthey find thatthis K -centralitycouldbeseenasageneralizationof thestandardeigenvectorcentralitymeasure.
Thisapproach,to useanexternalor nodeinherentstatuseffect,wasalsotakenupby physicistswhouseIsingmodelsto explainthebehavior of networks.Onthebasisof theIsingmodelwhichdescribetheinteractionbetweenspinsoftenusedincondensedmatterphysics,someresearchers(for exampleHerrero [Her02]) havealsoachievedsomegoodinsightsinto interactionswithin a socialnetwork usingthismodel.Thesemethodsfocusontransitionof anetwork from onestateinto an-otherandthey try to determinetheexactsystemcharacteristics(e.g.temperature)thatleadto aphasetransitionof thesystem.
Therehavebeenotherapproachesto theinterpretationof asymmetriccommu-nicationbehavior with theuseof suchindices.Freeman[Fre97]usedit to showhierarchieswithin a group.He, likeChino[Chi98] andBarnettandRice[BR85],generatesthematricesthatarethenthebasisfor theeigenvalueanalysisby split-ting a givenasymmetricrealsociomatrixinto its symmetricandskew-symmetric
12 CHAPTER2
part. While BarnettandRiceandFreemanremainin the real space,Chinousesthis approachto shift into Hilbert space.
Onelastaspectis thatof structuralstability whenlooking at thecommunica-tion patternstructure.This problemis at thecenterof perturbationtheory. Thereis no literatureaboutthis topic in SNA. Still it is of interestto find out how muchperturbationa network can“digest” without changingits structure.In thecourseof thisbookthereforegeneralliteratureaboutperturbationof Hermitianeigensys-temswill beintroduced.Therearetwo aspectsto keepin mind:
* Perturbationof theeigenvalues.This is closelyrelatedto traffic volumeandrelevanceof pattern.
* Perturbationof theeigenspaces.This is closelyrelatedto a changein rele-vanceof thememberswithin thestructure.
A generaland extensive introduction into perturbationtheory of linear op-eratorsis given in Kato [Kat95] (originally publishedin 1966). Kato givesanintroductioninto BanachandHilbert space,andon this basisgoeson to describeperturbationtheory. As anapplicationof specialinteresthegivesexamplesfromquantummechanics.Heretheresultsof perturbationtheoryin Hilbert spacehavean applicationfor examplewhen looking at Dirac operatorsor the Schrodingerequation.
A modern,moremathematicalapproachto perturbationboundsof eigensys-temsof Hermitianmatricescanbefoundfor examplein Dopicoet al. [DMM00],Mathias [Mat97], Barlow and Slapnicar [BS00], Fonseca [dF00] and Ipsen[Ips03] .
In agraph-theoreticalsettingCvetkovic etal. [CS97] giveanintroductionintothe effectsof perturbationon the eigenvectorsandeigenvaluesof graphsrepre-sentedby real valuedadjacency matrices.AppendixB [CS97, p.235-238]pro-videsa tableof eigenvalueandeigenvectorconfigurationsfor differentkinds ofgraphsup to B vertices.
As a lastsetof methodswe presentthoseusedto describetopologyandevo-lution of large networks. For a good overview of thesemethodsseeBarabasiandAlbert [BA02] andBarabasiandBianconi[BB01]. Heredifferentmethodsarebeingdescribedrangingfrom randomgraphsto percolationtheoryandBose-Einsteincondensation.Thesemethodshave beentaken from differentfields inphysicssuchascondensedmatterphysics,solid statephysicsandstatisticalme-chanics. The idea is that in all of thesefields thereexist extensive methodstodescribethe evolution andbehavior of either latticesor particleaggregates. Itis only a shortstepfrom theseconceptsto the ideathat humannetworks mightfollow similar lawsasthosedescribedin physics.
CHAPTER2 13
A field of physicsthatalsohasmuchto offer whenlooking at thebehavior ofnetworks is nonlineardynamics.SmaleandHirsch [HS74] or Strogatz [Str01]giveanintroductionto thefield. Thesemethodsplay animportantrole for exam-ple in theapplicationto viral marketing,wherethenonlinearbehavior on nearlyscale-freenetworksis anecessaryconditionfor success.
2.4 Other Applications of Eigenvector Centrality
Oneof thosemany applicationsnot within SNA, which will not be further dis-cussedin the courseof this work, has beenpresentedby Kleinberg [Kle99],[GKR98] who showed how web siteson the internetare linked to form groupsin view of their commoncontext. In a hypertext context the fact that onewebsite featuresa link to anotherweb site canbe definedasa choice,andthusthelink definesanentryin theadjacency matrix. In this context thematrixexplainsadirectedgraph,at thatpointwithoutweightsattachedto theedges.Kleinberg usestheconceptof hubandauthority, whichhederivesfrom incrementallycomputingandapproximatingtheprincipaleigenvalueandtheleft andright handeigenvectorbelongingto theprincipaleigenvalue.Theinterpretationis limited dueto thefactthat it identifiesonly the major hubandthe major authority, but doesnot revealmuchaboutthe substructure.Pageet al. [PBMW98] usedthis approachto cre-atethePageRankalgorithmwhich is now thebasisof theGooglesearchengine.A goodreview of thesemethodsandresultscanbe found in Park andThalwall[PT03]. A collectionof algorithmsthat arebeingusedin that field is given inBorodinetal. [BRRT01].
AnotherInternetrelatedresearchwasdonebyYaltaghianandBehnak[YC02],whousedifferentmethodsto analyzetheresultsof theGooglesearchengine.
Applicationsin organizationresearchhave alreadybeenpointedout in 1945by Simon(see [Sim00]). He suggeststhat theuseof email in organizationswillchangethe way information is being distributed, and that it may well causeadifferentway of informationdiffusion thanbefore. An examplethat this is thecaseis given in a paperby Krackhardt [KH93], who usesmethodsof SNA touncover hiddenstructureswithin anorganizationcomparedto thosegivenby theformal organization. In managementsiencethe evolution of organizationsis ofsomeimportance.This behavior canalsobe analyzedusingmethodsdescribedabove asfor examplein Guimeraet al. [GDDGF 02]. A goodoverview of theapplicationof socialnetwork analysisin organizationalresearchcanbefound inBorgatti andFoster[BF03].
In a morecommunicationmethodbasedarticleSmith [Smi02] appliessomeof theabovementionedmethodsto instantmessagingsystemsjustasEbel [EMB02]appliedthemto emailnetworks. The largestemailnetwork is mostprobablythe
14 CHAPTER2
USENET. A thoroughanalysisof this large network canbe found in Choi andDanowski [CD02].
The ideato to usethe communicationflow betweendifferentpoints(or ver-tices)to detectpatternsandactaccordingto theseresultsplayeda major role innaval warfareduringthesecondWorld War whensignalintelligencewasusedtofind from thepatternsof communicationthewhereaboutsof targets.The ideatoanalyzecommunicationstructureswith mathematicalmethodsdatesbackto the1950sandhassincegrown in relevanceandcapability. Yet thesimultaneousanal-ysis of inboundand outoundcommunicationbetweentwo members/nodeshasposeddifficulties,aswell asthefactthattheeigensystemanalysisusedup to nowdoesnot provide a completeinterpretationof the eigenspacethat could yield adetailedview on thepatternstructure.
Chapter 3
Theoretical Foundationsfor PatternAnalysis in SocialNetworks
In this chapterthe theoreticaland methodologicalbackgroundfor the analysisof communicationpatternsin socialnetworks will be presented.In section 3.1notationsanddefinitionsnecessaryfor SNA will be given. Section 3.2.1 willexplain theconceptsof rankandstatusandhow they canbemeasuredin a givennetwork. Thelastsection3.3will presentthemathematicalandgraph-theoreticalconceptsthatwill be needed.The main focusof this last sectionis to make thereaderfamiliarwith complex Hilbert spaceandthebehavior of linearoperatorsinthatspace.
3.1 SocialNetworks
3.1.1 Definitions
A socialnetworkwill bedefinedasin WassermanandFaust [WF94, p.20] asafinite setor setsof actors and the relation or relationsdefinedon them. (SocialNetwork.)
Therelationin thecasesdiscussedherewill bethesendingof andansweringto emails.Thenext smallerunit is thegroup.
Wellman[Wel01]definesagroupasaspecialtypeof socialnetwork;onethatis heavilyinterconnectedandclearlybounded.(Group.)
A subgroupis asubstructureof agroup,thatis definedby therelationtowardsits anchor (seebelow).(Subgroup.)
A virtual community(VC) following Rheingold [Rhe00,p.xvii] is a groupofpeoplewho usewordson screensto exchange pleasantriesandargue, engage inintellectualintercourse.... (Virtual Community.)
15
16 CHAPTER3
A moreformalizeddefinitionof anonlinecommunitycanbefoundin Preece[Pre00,p.10].Suchacommunityconsistsof
* peoplewho haveany kind of socialinteraction,
* haveacommongoal,asfor exampleinformationexchange,
* performtheir exchangeswithin certainrulesor socialnorms,
* andusecomputersto communicate.
ThusaVC is aspecialkind of asocialnetwork.In thecontext of thiswork ananchor is definedasthemostprominentmember
of asubgroup.(Anchor.)Thisprominenceis expressedby thefactthatthecomplex rankprestigeindex
hasthehighestabsolutevaluein theeigenvectorunderinspection.The terman-chor canbe usedarbitrarily eitherfor the mostprominentmemberof the wholegroup,or themostprominentmemberof asubgroup.Thenetwork‘s anchoris thememberwith thehighestabsoluteeigenvectorcomponentvaluebelongingto thehighestabsolutevalueeigenvalue.
Networks,andthuscommunicationnetworks,will berepresentedasweighteddirectedgraphs
@ ���L��������� wherethe M membersof the network are thevertices�N� � . Connectionsbetweenmemberswill bemappedasweightededges�O� � . Thegraph
will bedescribedby a weightedMQPJM adjacency matrix
�.
An entryof this matrix �����SR@T. if thereis a connectionbetweentwo vertices� �and � � , which is equivalentto �U0V+ � ,W4X� � . In theunweightedandundirectedcasetheadjacency matrixhasentries����� @Y- if �U0V+ � ,W4Z� � and . otherwise.
3.2 Rank and Status
Thissectionwill introducerankandstatusastermsandconceptsthatarerelevantto this book. After a discussionof several definitionsof thesetermsdifferentmeasurementsfor theseconceptswill begiven.
In Tab.( 3.1) definitionsof the conceptsby differentauthorsaregiven. Thegermantextshavebeentranslatedfor betterunderstanding.No standarddefinitioncanbe given for eitherof the concepts.In additionTab.( 3.2) shows how someof the conceptsare the foundationsfor otherconcepts(representedby “ [ ”) orarederivedon thebasisof anotherconcept(‘” \ ”), or areusedin a similar wayor evensynonymical (“ 7 ”). Only theuppertriangularof this matrix is filled forclearervisibility.
CHAPTER3 17C
once
ptS
chaf
ers
[Sch
95]
Bur
ghar
dt[B
ur79
]G
idde
ns[G
id95
]W
asse
rman
and
Fau
st[W
F94
]
Soc
ial
posi
-tio
n
[Bur
79,p
.91]
ara
teab
lefu
nc-
tion
that
ape
rson
hasi
na
give
nso
cial
stru
ctur
e
[WF
94,
p.34
8]po
si-
tion
refe
rsto
aco
llec-
tion
ofin
divi
dual
sw
hoar
esi
mila
rlyem
bedd
edin
netw
orks
ofre
latio
nsR
ole
[Sch
95,
p.29
0]ex
pec-
tatio
nsab
out
beha
vior
agr
oup
appo
ints
toth
ebe
arer
ofa
soci
alpo
sitio
nw
ithin
that
grou
p
[Bur
79,
p.92
]exp
ecta
tions
ofth
een
viro
nmen
tore
ven
the
so-
ciet
yas
aw
hole
abou
thow
ape
rson
issu
ppos
edto
beha
vew
hen
hold
ing
ace
rtai
npos
ition
[WF
94,
p.34
8]ro
lere
fers
toth
epa
ttern
sof
rela
tions
whi
chob
tain
betw
een
acto
rsor
be-
twee
npos
ition
s.S
tatu
s[S
ch95
,p.3
80]t
hem
ore
orle
sshi
ghst
andi
ngth
ata
pers
onha
sin
com
paris
onto
all
othe
rmem
bers
ofa
soci
ety
[Bur
79,
p.97
]soc
ials
tatu
sis
the
visi
ble
orre
cogn
izab
lere
-su
ltof
anev
alua
tion
ofth
eat
-tr
ibut
eof
apo
sitio
n
[Gid
95,
p.23
7]di
f-fe
renc
esin
perc
ep-
tion
byot
hers
that
aso
cial
grou
pha
sin
com
paris
onto
othe
rgr
oups
Ran
k[B
ur79
,p.
91]
rela
tive
impo
r-ta
nceo
fapo
sitio
non
ave
rtic
alim
port
ance
scal
eP
rest
ige
[Bur
79,p
.103
]sub
ject
ive:
the
spec
ulat
iono
fa
pers
onth
ata
cert
ain
beha
vior
yiel
dsso
cial
acce
ptan
cean
da
gain
ofes
ti-m
atio
n
[WF
94,p
.174
]apr
es-
tigeo
usac
tor
(is)
one
who
isth
eob
ject
ofex
-te
nsive
ttie
s,th
usfo
-cu
sind
sole
lyon
the
ac-
tora
srec
ipie
nt
Tabl
e3.
1:D
efini
tions
ofro
le,s
tatu
s,ra
nk,p
rest
ige
18 CHAPTER3
socialposition Role Status Rank Prestige
socialposition - [Role - [ 7Status - 7 7Rank - [
Prestige -
Table3.2: OrderandSynonymity of role,status,rank,prestige
Rankandstatusarerelatedin the sensethat sincethe word statusis mostlyusedin conjunctionwith a rating like “high” or “low”, or that thecontext yieldsthisinformationthesetwo areusedsynonymical. Sometimeseventheword“pres-tige” is usedasa synonym. But all thesethreearebasedon the role a memberholdsin agivencommunity.
In thecontext of this booktheseabstractconceptswill beusedto describere-sultsof mathematicalevaluationwith respectto thecommunicationbehavior of amemberof thegroup.Thefollowing view is adopted:a membercanhave differ-entroles,for exampleanchoror lurker (seelater for a detailedexplanation).Therolehasaninherentrankor statusandat thesametimeaninherentprestige.Bothdependon the mathematicalcomputationdefinedon the communicationtrafficgeneratedby eachmember.
3.2.1 DegreebasedRank
In this subsectiontherankbasedon in- or out-degreewill bedescribed.Thusanintuitive introductionto the conceptof rank is given even thoughthe proposedmethodis not restrictedto degreecentrality. Degreein this context whendirectedweightedgraphsare observed is the numberof edges� that eitherdepartfroma vertex � (out-degree: 2�]� � � ) or are pointedtowardsthe vertex (in-degree:2�^� � � ). In the caseof weightedgraphswe alsodefinethe strengthfollowingBarratet al. [BBV04] as _<]� and _`^� asthenumberof messagesthateithergo outfrom vertex + or comeinto vertex + overall connectedvertices.
Centrality
Thereareseveraldefinitionsfor centrality a � � � . Centralityhereis definedfol-lowing WassermanandFaust[WF94] by thefact that in a non-directionalsettinga memberis saidto be central,if he is connectedto many othermembers.In adirectionalsettingcentralityis definedby thechoicesthemembermakes.This isreflectedin thenumberof differentothermembershecommunicateswith.
CHAPTER3 19
Degreecentralityasdefinedin WassermanandFaust [WF94, p.199]focusesonthechoicesthatarebeingmadeby themembersof anetwork, thusthecentral-ity in that caseis basedon the out-degree. A centralmemberis thusa memberthathasmany outgoingconnectionsto differentmemberswithin thenetwork. 2�]�of vertex + is definedasthenumberof verticesthat + is connectedto asgiveninEq.(3.1)
2 ]� @bc�edgfih ��� (3.1)
with h ��� @j- if �����LR@8. and h ��� @8. if ����� @8. . Thusthestandardizedcentralityinadirectedunweightedgraphcanbedefinedasin Eq.(3.2):
a � @ 2�]�0WMlkm-n4 with a � � � (3.2)
In theweightedcaseit is not possibleto standardizeanymore,sincethenum-berof possibleconnectionsis no longerknown. In thatcasejust the row sumistaken. This thenhasthe problemof comparabilitybetweennetworks. (Degreecentrality.)
Strengthis theconceptin theweightedcase.Thestandardizedform is givenin Eq.(3.3). It is givenastherow sumof theweightedadjacency matrix dividedby thetotal sumof matrix entries,with ����� � � and M thenumberof verticesormembersin thenetwork.
_ ]� @ o b �edgf �����o b ��dgf o b �pdgf ����� with _ ]� � � (3.3)
Thereareseveralderivedconceptsof centralitywhich will bepresentedwith-out further explanation. We will presenthereonly thosethat arerelevant in thecontext of directionalrelationships.It shouldalsobenotedthatall of thesecen-trality measurescan be generalizedto group centrality measures.This can beachievedfor exampleby defininghypernodesthatcontaintheverticesthatbelongto thatgroup.
Standardizedclosenesscentrality is definedfollowing again [WF94, p.200]for adirectionalandunweightedgraphasin Eq.(3.4):
aq, � @ Mlkm-o b�pdgf 2�Gr_`st0V+ � ,34 with aq, � � � (3.4)
with 2�Gr_`st0V+ � ,W4 denotingthe shortestdistancebetweennode + and , . Closenesscentralitygivesan indicationof how closea memberis to theothermembersofthegroup.Thiscanintuitivelybederivedfrom thedistancesbetweenvertex + andall othermembers.It shouldbe mentionedthoughthat if the actoris an isolate,
20 CHAPTER3
meaning,that he hasno connectionsat all, the sumof distancesbecomes. andthustheindex is undefined.(Closenesscentrality.)
Betweennesscentrality uva � � � putsthefocusonthefactthatavertex � with ahighbetweennesscentralityis likeabottleneck.All (or much)of thecommunica-tion within agivennetwork hasto go throughthis vertex. Betweennesscentralityasdefinedby Eq.(3.5) is thusbasedonthenumberof pathsthatgo throughacer-tain vertex whenconnectingtwo verticesin relationto all pathswithin a networkthatconnectthesetwo vertices.
uqa � @ ob �pdgfrw �tx5�vy ^���{z y ���0WMlk|-"4t0WM}k~E�4 with uva � � � (3.5)
with y ��� thenumberof pathsbetweenvertex + and , and y ^��� thenumberof pathsbetweenvertex + and , that containvertex G . This view requiresthe assump-tion that the choiceof communicationchannel/pathis equallydistributed. Thatmightnot bethecase,if preferentialbehavior is takeninto account.Betweennesscentrality hasbeenusedto detectclusterswithin networks [GN02], [NG03].(Betweennesscentrality.)
Informationcentralityis a strongerversionof betweennesscentrality, in thatit now takesinto accountthatpathsbetweentwo verticesmight not be takenforthe transportof informationon an equallydistributedbasis. Latora[LM04] ex-tendedthis index to incorporatesomenotionsfrom flows in non-directionalandweightedor unweightedgraphs,specifically the notion that information mighttake the shortestpossiblepath available betweentwo vertices. Thus the effi-ciency � ��� � � of two verticesregarding information transferis presumedtobe proportionalto
f� ^ b<��� ^������ �qw �e� . The efficiency of the network is then the aver-
age ��@�������q������� � �b � b 9 f3� . If now a graph w� is constructedwhereall edgesincidentto
vertex + have beenremoved, thenthe informationcentrality GVa � is definedasinEq.(3.6)
G�a � @ ��kQ� �� � � (3.6)
Informationcentralityis thustherelativedrop in thenetworkefficiencycausedbytheremoval of edgesincidentto theobservedvertex.(Informationcentrality.)K -centrality as definedby Bonacich[BL01] given in Eq.( 3.7) addsan ex-antestatus,givenasa vector � to thecentralitymeasureandweighsthe relativeimportanceof the grouped-derived rank in comparisonto the memberinherentstatusby acoefficient K .
@�K � � �� � (3.7)
with�
theunweighted,directedadjacency matrix.(K -centrality.)
CHAPTER3 21
In a graph-theoreticalsetting,on the otherhand,a centercanbe definedasin Jungnickel [Jun99,p.91]. A vertex � is central if it hasminimal excentricity.Excentricity � % beingdefinedas � %�� @¡ ��%�� 2�Gr_`st03+ � ,W4 . Thusavertex + is seenasat thecenterof agraphif Eq.(3.8) is calculated,
y a � @¢ lGVM � � %�� with y a � � � (3.8)
whichexpressesthefactthatthisvertex hastheminimallongestdistance2�Gr_`st0V+ � ,34of all verticesin thenetwork. Thismeasureis definedfor bothnon-directionalanddirectionalsettings.It is a generalizationof degreecentrality, in thatall distancesareused,notonly thoseto thenearestneighbors.(Graphcentrality.)
Prestige
Following [WF94, p.202]prestigein comparisonto centralityrepresentsthede-greeto which a vertex is chosenby otherverticeswithin a directedandpossiblyweightednetwork. It is calculatedasin Eq.(3.9).Thusa vertex hasa high pres-tige, if it hasa high in-degree,definedanalogousto theout-degreefor centralitywith 2�^� @ o b �pdgf h �p� thecolumnsumasthein-degreeof vertex + :
/ � @ 2�^�0WMlkm-n4 with / � � � (3.9)
Thestrengthin this caseis definedanalogousto thetheoutboundstrength.Itis thecolumnsumof matrix
�, asin Eq.(3.10).
_ ^ � @ o b ��dgf �����o b ��dgf o b �edgf ����� (3.10)
Proximity prestigeis the in-boundanalogonto closenesscentrality. It is de-finedasin WassermanandFaust [WF94,p.204]by Eq.(3.11):
/>/ � @ £ � z 0�Mlk|-"4o 2�Gr_`st03, � +¤4 z £ � with /�/ � � � (3.11)
with £ � representingthe numberof memberswho are in the influencerangeofvertex + , whichmeansmemberswhocanreachvertex + . Thusproximity prestigeasdefinedoverdirectedunweightedgraphs.(Proximity prestige.)
3.2.2 Rank Prestigeor Statusindex and eigenvector centrality
As was shown in section 3.2.1 neithercentrality nor prestigeby itself give acompletepicture of the relevanceof a vertex within a network. By finding anindex thatcombinesbothviews,thiscanbeachieved.Statusin thesensethatwill
22 CHAPTER3
beusedin thiswork will have themeaningthatavertex is centralandprestigiousat the sametime. Since [WF94] usestatusandrank prestigeassynonyms, thiswill alsobethecasefor therestof this work. Statusor rankthusin thiswork willbedefinedby thetraffic in emailvolumethatis exchangedandby thepatternthatbecomesvisible in theeigensystem.
Thestatusindex asdefinedby Katzusesfor thecalculationnotonly thedirectpathsbetweentwo neighbors,but alsoall pathsconnectingtwo verticessincethe+ -th power of the adjacency matrix
�hasasits entriesthe numbersof pathsof
length + betweentwo vertices.This leadsto theinterpretationthattherankof onememberdependson therankof thoseheis connectedto.
In generalthis is referredto aseigenvectorcentrality, sincethis is calculatedasfollows:
Theideaof therankprestigeindex is basedontheideathatnotonly thedirectneighborhoodof a vertex influencesthe rank of a vertex, but also the rank ofthe verticesthat areconnectedto vertex , by way of othervertices. This holdsalso in a directedgraph. This can be representedby the sum of an adjacencymatrix
�poweredto /Q@¥-§¦`¦<¦�¨ . That thepower of anadjacency matrix gives
the numberof + -lengthpathsbetweentwo verticesis known from graphtheory[Jun99, p.96]. Now the questionis, how to find the rank index given for eachmemberof a network basedon the sumof the poweredmatrices. This canbesolvedwith the help of two mathematicalproperties.For oneevery function ofa diagonalizablematrix leadsto a functionof its eigenvaluesandsecondthefactis used,thata powerseriesconvergesundercertainconditions.Thesetwo resultswill beintroducedin section 3.3.4.
Thecomponentsof thecorrespondingeigenvectorsaretheindicesthatrepre-senttherankof themember.
Statusasproposedby Katz [Kat53] is definedby the questionasked. In thecourseof this work statusis thushigh if onememberis identifiedasananchor.Thememberwith thehighestoverallstatuswill beidentifiedastheanchor corre-spondingto thehighestabsoluteeigenvalueof thesystem.
3.2.3 Communication Patterns
In additionto eigenvectorcentralitytheprojectorsderivedform theeigenvectorsyield an interpretation.As will be explainedin moredetail in section 3.3.5theorthogonalprojectorin Eq.( 3.58) givesa representationof structuralsimilarityfor memberswithin asubspaceandthepatternstructureof theoriginalspace.See[BL04] for adiscussionof thecasefor
©���������ª���with
� � � .
CHAPTER3 23
3.3 Linear Operators in Hilbert Space
In thissectionthemathematicalbackgroundis presented.As themethodproposedin this book is basedon the complex valuedrepresentationof communication,complex numberswill first be introducedin section 3.3.1. As a secondsteptheconstructof Hilbert spacewill bepresentedin section 3.3.2. Section 3.3.3willintroduceHermitianoperatorsin Hilbert space,followedby eigensystemanalysisof suchoperatorin section 3.3.4. In section 3.3.5orthogonalprojectorsarede-fined,which arecomputedfrom theeigenvectors,andthe interpretationof theseprojectorsin thecontext of communicationpatternanalysisis given. SinceHer-mitian operatorsbehave very predictableunderperturbation,which is of interestwhenanalyzingcommunicationpatterns,section 3.3.6will introducethosechar-acteristicsof Hermitianoperators.Finally section3.4will presenttheapplicationof the proposedmethodto two typesof graphs,namelythe star graphand thecompletegraph.Resultsin thebidirectionalsymmetriccasewill becomparedtothe undirectedcase,andresultsfrom Cvetcovic, Rowlinson andSimic [CS97]will beusedfor validation.Also eigensystemsof asymmetricbidirectionalgraphsandperturbedgraphsaregivenanddiscussed.
3.3.1 ComplexNumbersand Hermitian Matrices
Unlessotherwisestatedall numbersarecomplex ( � � ). Columnvectorswill bewritten in bold face , with components%5« � H�@¬-L¦<¦<¦M . Thevectorspacewill bedenotedby
� @ � b . Capitalletterswill representmatrices�
with �U�ª� denotingthe entry in the k-th row andthe l-th column( + � ,®@¯-L¦<¦<¦M ). Greekletterswillstandfor theeigenvalueswith
� � representingthek-th eigenvalue. �� will denotethe eigenvector correspondingto the + -th eigenvalue. The complex conjugatetransposeof a vector will be givenas 6° . The transposeof a vector will bedenotedas � .
Theequation%�±�� -�@Y. hasno solutionin�
. By introducingtheimaginaryunit G with G ± @ k�- this equationis solvable. The set of the real numbers
�augmentedby the imaginaryunit G andtheoperations� and ² definedsuchthat0 �� G�uq4 � 0Wa � GV2³4§@j0 �� a`4 � G�03u � 254 and 0 �� GVuq4´²60Wa � GV2³4§@j0 � a:k�uv254 � G�0 � 2 � uvat4with � � u � a � 2�� � is definedasthefield of thecomplex numbers
�.
As anintuitivealternative introductionto complex numbersconsidera vectorµ in a2-dimensionalplanein�
asin Fig.( 3.1).Whenwe now renamethe % -axis to “real” andthe ¶ -axis to “imaginary”, the
transitionto theGauss-planehasbeenachievedascanbeseenin Fig.( 3.2).It canthuseasilybeseenthatthecomplex number· canberepresentedlikea
vectorin algebraicform or equivalentlyin polarform:
24 CHAPTER3
x
y
x1
y1
p=x1+y1
Figure3.1: Two componentvectorin� ±
Re
Im
x1
y1 p = x1 + i * y1
Figure3.2: Two componentvectorin theGaussplane
·¸@ ��� GVuZ@ � · � � ^º¹ (3.12)
with therealpartof · beingdenotedas »��U03·�4L@ � , theimaginarypartas £ ¼03·�4½@u , with G theimaginaryunit ( G ± @¾k�- ). · denotesthecomplex conjugate·¸@ � k¿GVuof · . Theabsolutevalueandphasearedefinedby Eqs.( 3.13)and( 3.14).
� · � @ÁÀ � ± � u ± (3.13) @ÄÃ>ŪÆtÆ`Ç�È »��U0W·�4� · � . I¡ÂÉI|Ê (3.14)
Thefollowing fiveequationsarehelpfulwhendealingwith complex numbers:
CHAPTER3 25
· f · ± @ � · f<�Ë� · ± � � ^Ë�e¹"Ì F ¹tÍ � (3.15)·�@ · if andonly if ·�� � (3.16)·�·�@ � · � ± (3.17)· � ·�@8E>»��U0W·�4 (3.18)
· f · ± @¬03»��U0W· f 4λ��U0W· ± 4 � £ ¼03· f 4 £ ¼03· ± 4ª4� G�03»��U0W· ± 4 £ ¼03· f 4ikÏ»��U0W· f 4 £ ¼03· ± 4Î4 (3.19)
Eq.( 3.15)shows that themultiplicationof two complex numbersis achievedby multiplying the absolutevaluesand addingthe phasesof the two complexnumbers. Multiplication by a complex numberis thus equivalent to a rotationabout
 ± andscalingby � · ± � ascanbeseenin Fig.( 3.3).
Re
Im
p=|p| e^(iφ1)
q=|q|e^(iφ2)
r=|r|e^(iµ)=|p||q|e^(i(φ1+φ2))
Figure3.3: Multiplication of two complex numbersh and/Eq.(3.16)statesthatacomplex numberandits complex conjugate(or adjoint)
numberareequalif andonly if · is real. Eq.(3.17)expressesthatthemultiplica-tion of a complex numberwith its complex conjugategivesthethesquareof theabsolutevalueof thatnumber, which canalsobeexpressedas »��U03·�4 ± � £ ¼03·�4 ± .This againis a realnon-negative number. Eq.( 3.18)statesthefact, that thesumof a complex numberandits complex conjugateis two timestherealpartof thecomplex number. Eq.( 3.19)givesa representationof the productof a complexnumberandacomplex conjugatenumber. Thiswill berelevantwheninterpretingtheorthogonalprojectors.
In analogyto complex numberswe now introduceHermitianmatrices,sincescalarscanbeviewedas -�PÐ- matrices.
A matrix'
is calledHermitian,if andonly if
26 CHAPTER3
' ° @ ' (3.20)
with' ° representingthecomplex conjugatetransposeof H. Thecomplex conju-
gatetransposeof a matrix'
is found,whentheoriginal matrix'
is eitherfirsttransposedandtheneachentry is complex conjugated,or vice versa.Eq.( 3.20)meansthat thematrix entriescanbewritten as Ñ �p� @ Ñ �ª� . Theanalogonin
�is
thesymmetricmatrix. Hermitianmatricesarealsonormal(Eq. 3.21)asfollowsfrom Eq.(3.20):
'É' ° @ ' ° ' (3.21)
A matrix'
is unitarily similar( Ò ° ' Ò¯@�Ó , with Ò unitaryand Ó diagonal)to a diagonalmatrix if it is normal. This meansthat for normal matricestheeigenvectorsform anorthogonalsystem.
Any matrix Ô � � b canbewritten asin Eq.(3.22).With thefirst partgivingahermitianpartandtheseconda skew-hermitian( Ô ° @YkÕÔ ).
Ô @ -E 03Ô � Ô ° 4 � -E 0VÔ k Ô ° 4 (3.22)
Thecharacteristicsof Hermitianmatriceswhich areof specialinterestin thiswork are thoseof their eigensystem.Thesecharacteristicswill be discussedinsection 3.3.4.
3.3.2 Hilbert Spaceasa specialVector Space
Hilbert spaceis a
* complete
* normed
* innerproduct
vectorspace.In thefollowing thesecharacteristicswill beintroduced.For any given vectorspace
�on any field the following equationshave to
hold:
CHAPTER3 27
N�~! � � Ö � ! � � (closure)(3.23)
0 N�~! 4 � × @ N� 0 !}� × 4 Ö � ! � × � � (associativity)(3.24)N�~! @ !}�Ï Ö � ! � � (commutativity)(3.25)ؤ٠[ �� Ù @ Ö � � (neutralelement)(3.26)Ø -S[ - @ Ö � � (neutralelement)(3.27)Ø 0�k 4§[ �� 0k 4§@ Ù Ö � � (additive inverse)(3.28)�� � � Ö � � �X� � �(3.29)
0 � uq4 @ � 03u 4 Ö � � uS� �Z� Ö � � (associativity)(3.30)� 0 N�~! 4L@ ��l� ��! Ö � � �Z�ÎÖ � ! � � (distributivity)(3.31)
0 �Õ� uq4 @ ��l� u Ö � � uÕ� �ZÚÖ � ! � � (distributivity)(3.32)
A norm / on agivenvectorspace�ÜÛ � b
is givenby
& &�Ý @¬0bc��dgf �n%��©�
Ý 4 f3Þ Ý (3.33)
Thenormsmostoftenusedarethe - -norm(& & f @ o b ��dgf �n%���� ), the E -norm
(& & ± @j0 o b��dgf �n%��©� ± 4
f3Þ ± ) andthe ¨ -norm(& &qß @¡ ��%����´%���� ).
In Hilbert spacethe norm is analogto the E -norm, but is basedon the innerproduct,asdefinedin Eq.(3.34). The inner productof and ! is a semilinear(conjugate-linearin thefirst partandlinearin thesecond)form on a givenvectorspace
�andis representedas
� �n!i# @ ° ! @bc��dgf %�� ¶ � (3.34)
Theinnerproductnormis consequentlydefinedby Eq.(3.35):à � ~�n1# @ & & (3.35)
28 CHAPTER3
This is the analogonto the Euclideanor E -norm& & ± @ à o b ��dgf �"%��¸� ±
which by Eq.( 3.17) is thesameasào b ��dgf %��q%�� , which following Eq.( 3.34) is
thesameasEq.(3.35).For agivenarbitrarynormthefollowing rulesmusthold:
& &Õá . (3.36)& & @�.�â @ Ù (3.37)& �� & @ �´�ã� & & � Ö � � � (3.38)& N�~! & I & & � & ! & (3.39)
A vectorspace�
is saidto becomplete,if everysequence� % b � converges.In
acompletenormedspacetheCauchyconditionäæåËç � ^ b � b w � �{è ß & �é k �ê & [ .is satisfied.
Thematrixnorm& � &
is aninducednormfor a givenvectornorm. Thusthematrixnorminducedby theinner-product-normis statedin Eq.(3.40).It explainsto whatextentavectoris stretchedby
�or shrunkby
� 9 f if � is nonsingular.
& � & @¡ ��%�ëíì>ë dgf & � & (3.40)
Therearetwo matrixnorms,whichareof interestin thiscontext:
* TheFrobeniusnormasdefinedin Eq.(3.41)
& � & ±î @ c �qw � �´������� ± @ms�ï � aq�U0 � ° � 4 (3.41)
* The 2-normasdefinedin Eq.( 3.42) following Eq.( 3.40) andEq.( 3.52).Thisnormwill betheoneusedasthestandardmatrixnorm,if nototherwisestated.
& � & @ � � �$ð�ñ � (3.42)
If�
is nonsingularthen& � 9 f & @ fò óvô¤õ÷ö>ò .
Eq.(3.42)definesat thesametime thespectralradius,which will beintro-ducedin moredetail in section 3.3.4.
In Hilbert spacethusthefollowing equationshold:
CHAPTER3 29
� ~�´6# á . with� ø�n1# @Ä. if andonly if @Ä. (3.43)� �� �n!$# @ � � �"!$# Ú � ~�´��!$# @ � � �n!$# � � � (3.44)� N�~!ù�"×5# @ � ~��×5#�� � !ù�´×5# (3.45)� �n!$# @ � !ù�n1# (3.46)
3.3.3 Hermitian Operators in Hilbert Space
A linearoperatoron a givenfield is definedasa functionthatsendsevery vector � ú into anothervector ! � ú by a linear transformation.Thusthe transfor-mationin
�f @bc^ dgf af ^ ! ^¦<¦<¦
b @bc^ dgf ab ^ ! ^
(3.47)
with a ��� �Ïû canalsobewritten as @jû ! with a ��� theentriesof thematrix û .û is thencalleda linearoperator.The adjoint space
� ° of a vectorspace�
is the setof all semilinearforms(e.g. inner productEq.( 3.44))on a vectorspace
�[Kat95, p.11] (Pleasenote
that Kato usesrow vectorsandthusthe inner productis definedaslinear in thefirst part andsemi-linearin the second). A selfadjoint linear operatoris calledHermitian.In Hilbert spacetheadjointspace
� ° canbeidentifiedwith thevectorspace
�itself. For a proof see [Kat95, p.252-253].Linearoperatorsasdefined
in Eq.(3.20)will beof interestfor therestof this book.Thefollowing (in)equalitieshold in anormedinnerproductspace:* Cauchy-Schwarzinequality:� �Vü �n1#"� I à �Vü � ü # à � ~�´6# (3.48)
with equalityif @ � ü � � � � .* Besselinequality: for any vectorü
andan orthonormalbasis³ý with HJ@- � ¦<¦<¦ � M of avectorspaceú bc «ªdgf � �3ü �n:ýÎ#´� ± I &Züù& ± (3.49)
30 CHAPTER3
If the ³ý formacompleteorthonormalsystemtheBesselinequalitybecomesParseval’sequality: bc «ªdgf � �3ü �":ýÎ#´� ± @ &þüù& ± (3.50)
* TriangleinequalityEq.(3.39)&(ü �~ & @ à �3ü �~ � ü �~1# I &Züù& � & & @ à �3ü � ü #6� à � �"1#(3.51)
with equalityif @ � ü asin Eq.(3.48)andin addition � � � .
In Hilbert spaceEq.( 3.48)becomesan equalityandEq.( 3.50)holdsdueto thefacttheconditionfor equalityhold.
ThusHilbert spaceis a veryconvenientvectorspacefor Hermitianoperators,sincefor thepurposesof this book,many featureshelp to leadto a quitenaturalinterpretationin thecontext of SNA.
3.3.4 Eigensystemanalysisof Hermitian Operators
In thissectionthemainpartof themethodologicalbasisof thiswork is introducedsincethe methodproposedis basedon the eigensystemanalysisof Hermitianmatrices.
The eigenvalue equationof a Hermitian matrix'
with eigenvector andeigenvalue
�is givenby Eq.(3.52):
' @ � (3.52)
Hermitianmatriceshave thefollowing characteristics:
* All eigenvaluesare real (Eq.( 3.53)) andcan thusbe orderedeither from� ��ð�ñ @ � f�ÿ ¦<¦<¦ ÿ � � ^ b @ � b , or asin thecontext of this bookby theirabsolutevalue.
� � � � Ö + with � � f � @¢ ��%��©� � �¸��ÿ ¦<¦<¦ ÿ�� � b � @¡ lG3M ��� � �¸�(3.53)
because�V' j� 1# @ � � ¬� 1# @ � � C�g1# and
� C� ' 1# @ � C� � 1# @� � ø�´1# andEq.(3.20)imply�V' ø�´1# @ � ù� ' 1# andthus
� @ � whichmeansby Eq.(3.16)
� � � (see [Mey00, p. 548], [Kat95,p. 53]).
* Thelargestabsoluteeigenvalueis thespectralradiusbecauseof Eq.(3.42).
CHAPTER3 31
* Eigenvectorsbelongingto differenteigenvaluesform anorthogonalsystem,whichcanbechosento beorthonormal
� � �n��Ë# @ � ��� (follows from (3.20)) (3.54)
with � �ª� @ � . if + R@Ä, �- if +O@Ä, (3.55)
Thisalsoholdstruefor arbitraryrotation:
� � ^º¹ � �¸� � ^º¹ � ��æ# @¡� 9U^º¹ � � ^º¹ � � ��¸�n��#@¡� ^Ë��¹ � 95¹ � � � ����n��æ#@¡� ^Ë��¹ � 95¹ � � � ��� (3.56)
* They canberepresentedbyacompletespectraldecompositionasin Eq.(3.57).Theeigenvaluescanbeinterpretedasweightsof thecorrespondingeigenspace.
' @bc��dgf � ����� (3.57)
with
�1� @ ��q °� @ � %f %f ¦<¦`¦ %f % b¦<¦<¦ ¦<¦`¦ ¦<¦<¦% b %f ¦<¦`¦ % b % b�� (3.58)
representingtheorthogonalprojectors.Note,that o b ��dgf ��� @ £ , ��°� @ ��� ,� ±� @ �1� . For moredetailseesection 3.3.5.
* Any function i0 ' 4 of a Hermitianmatrix'
canalsobeseenasa functionof its eigenvalues i0 � 4 . Now let i0 ' 4§@ o ßÝ d�� ' Ý bea power series,thenit follows that i0 � ^ 4X@ o ßÝ d�� � Ý ^ �Ö Gþ@ - � ¦<¦<¦ÎM , since i0 ' 4X@� i0�Ò Ó�ÒQ9 f 4with Ò representingthematrixof all eigenvectorsand Ó adiagonalmatrixwith i0 � ^ 4 asentries.Thiscanbeseenwhenthefunctionis expanded:
32 CHAPTER3
i0 ' 4i@ ßc Ý d�� ' Ý@ßc Ý d�� 0 bc ��dgf � ����� 4 Ý by Eq.(3.57)
@¬0bc��dgf � ���1� 4 � � 0 bc ��dgf � ���1� 4 f � 0 bc ��dgf � ����� 4 ± � ¦`¦<¦
@¬0bc��dgf � ���1� 4 � � 0 bc ��dgf � ���1� 4 f � 0 bc ��dgf � ����� 41²�0 bc ��dgf � ����� 4 � ¦<¦`¦
@¬0bc��dgf � ���1� 4 � � 0 bc ��dgf � ���1� 4 f � 0ª0 � f���f ² � f��Lf 4� 0 � f���f ² � ± � ± 4 � ¦<¦<¦e4 � ¦<¦`¦
@¬0bc��dgf � ���1� 4 � � 0 bc ��dgf � ���1� 4 f � 0 bc ��dgf � ����� 4 ± � ¦`¦<¦ by �1���1� @ � �������
@ßc Ý d�� bc ��dgf � Ý � ���
@bc��dgf i0 � � 4 ���
(3.59)
It is awell known resultthatsuchpowerseriesconvergeundercertaincon-ditionswhichalsoholdfor everyadjacency matrix
' � � . [Mey00, p.618].Wenow useaspecialtypeof powerseries,thevonNeumannseriesgiveninEq.(3.60)andtheirconvergencecriteria,sincevonNeumannseriesexactlyreflecttherelationshipwe needto find therankindex introducedin section3.2.2.
£ � ' � ' ± � ' = � ¦<¦<¦5@ßc Ý dgf '
Ý
@C0 £ k ' 4 9f
â ,íGV Ý è ß�' Ý @�.â � � ��ðñ ��� - (3.60)
CHAPTER3 33
which is equivalentto&®' & � - . Since
& ' & @ � � ��ðñ � (Eq.(3.42)). Thisis equivalentto the factestablishedabove thata functionof
'generatesa
functionof�. It followsthatthecorrespondingpowerseriesfor
�converges
if � � ��ðñ ��� - . This meansthat if the von Neumannseriesconvergesfor', this is connectedto theeigensystemof
'in thatthepower seriesfor
�convergesto 0-5k � 4�9 f [ � � ��� - . Thustheeigensystemof
'approximates
theeigensystemof thepowerseriesandconvergesin thelimit.
* Eq.(3.57)togetherwith Eq.(3.50)yieldstheresult,thattheeigenvaluescanbeusedto explain thecontainedvarianceof asubspace.Thevariance� ± of is definedas � ± @ fb o � 0 %�� k��64 ± @ fb & k��� & ± with � representingthemeanand � theunit vector.
Proof:
&þ' kbc��dgf � ����� & ± @ �3' k bc ��dgf � ���1�¸� ' k bc ��dgf � �����<# Eq.(3.35)
@ �3' � ' # k �3' �bc��dgf � ���1�n# k � bc ��dgf � ���1�¸� ' #
k �V' �bc��dgf � ���1�n# Eq.(3.45)
@ &þ' & ± kSE &Z' & ± � �bc��dgf � �����¸� bc ��dgf � ���1�n# Eq.(3.35)
@Yk &(' & ± � c ^ w «� ^ � « � � ^ ���g«t# Eqs.(3.53), ( 3.57),( 3.58)
@Yk &(' & ± �bc^ dgf� ±^ @�.� &(')& ± @ bc
��dgf � ±�(3.61)
If onesumsnot over all M but only to an index I M anddividesby thetotal sum of all
� ±� , the result shows the variancecoveredby the firsteigenspaces.
* They arewell conditioned,which meansthata smalldisturbance�
of theHermitian
'matrixonly resultsin achangeof theeigensystemupto
& � &.
Seesection 3.3.6for details.
34 CHAPTER3
For matricesof theform discussedin chapters4 and 6, thefollowing charac-teristicshold:
Let'
be a matrix with Ñ �ª� @ . (no self reference)thenfollowing the factthat' @ �SÓ ��9 f the o b ��d�� � � @ s�ï � aq�U0 ' 4¼@ o b��d�� Ñ �ª� @ . . This leads
immediatelyto theexistenceof negativeeigenvalues.Of specialinterestis thematrix ! of order M � with!Y@#" . b�$�b �� ° . �%$��'& (3.62)
with�
representinga MøPÏ matrix. In general,this is the representationof abipartitegraph.
In thespecialcaseof n=1andm=k thismatrix representsadirected,weightedstargraphwith + � - vertices.Thespectrumof thatsystemis describedasfollows:�L0(!�4L@ � � � f � � � ± � ¦<¦<¦ � k � � F b 9 f � k � � F b � (3.63)
(see[Mey00, p. 555]) with � � fn� @ � � � F b � , � � ± � @ � � � F b 9 fn� , etc.The eigenvaluesareby definition of the sameabsolutevalue,but being the
squarerootsof thesingularvaluesof�
they have eithersign. For therespectiveeigenvectorsthis leadsto thefactthatthey areonly determinedup to multiplesofÊ
.As anexamplelet
'bea )�P*) Hermitianmatrixof astargraphwith Ñ �ª� @�.
and Ñ ��� @¬. for 03+:,W4�� � 03E+)�4 � 0,)�E�4 � . Theequationsfor theeigensystemarethengivenexplicitly following Eq.(3.52)by Eq.(3.64). Thephaseof theeigenvectorcomponentswill becalculatedby Eq.(3.65).
. %f�� Ñ f ± % ± � Ñ f = % = @ � %fÑ f ± %f�� . % ± � . % = @ � % ±Ñ f = %f�� . % ± � . % = @ � % =(3.64)
Thusit follows,thatthephasesfor %frw ± w = canbeexpressedas:
% = @ -� Ñ f =% ± @ -� Ñ f ±%f @ -� ± =c ��dgf � Ñ fW��� ± @Y-
(3.65)
CHAPTER3 35
The last equationholds, becausethe determinant2U�`st0 ' k � £ 4 @ k � = �� Ñ f = Ñ f = � � Ñ f ± Ñ f ± @ k � 0 � ± k o =��dgf � Ñ fW�m� ± 4}@ . . This holds for� = @ .
and� ± @ � o =��dgf � Ñ fW�Ï� ± (Eq. 3.34),which is the sameas
� frw ± @.- &�ü f &(Eq.3.35).
It canbeseen,that in theeigenvectorof anunperturbedstar, thephaseof theoriginalmatrixentryis keptbut complex conjugated.Thisis understandablewhenonelooksat theprojectors.
3.3.5 Orthogonal Projectors
The fact, that theentries/ ��� of theprojectors�g« in Eq.( 3.58)aregivenby %�� %��with + � ,�@Y- � ¦<¦<¦ � M theindex within theeigenvector�« , it followsfromEqs.(3.17)and( 3.19)that
/ ��� @ %�� %��@j03»��U0 %�� 4λ��U0 %�� 4 � £ ¼0 %�� 4 £ ¼0 %�� 4ª4 � G�0 £ ¼0 %�� 4λ��U0 %�� 4$k~»��U0 %�� 4 £ ¼0 %�� 4ª4@ � ����n��n#6� G �n�� P �$�(3.66)
with 0 �� P �� 4 thecrossproductof two vectors.Weregardeachcomplex number%�� and %�� asa two componentvector � � ± in this casewith components%��tw f @»��U0 %�� 4 and %��tw ± @ £ ¼0 %�� 4 . The crossproductof two vectorsis againa vector,that is orthogonalto the planespannedby the two original vectorsandhasthelengthidenticalto theareaof theparallelogramspannedby thetwo vectorswhichcanbecalculatedusingthedeterminantof thematrixbuilt by thetwo row vectors.This leadsto thefollowing interpretationof projector� « in Mat.( 3.67)( [Chi98],[BL04]):
* Eachentry gives in its real part a measureof the structuralsimilarity orclosenessbetweenthecommunicationpatternsof two memberswithin thissubspace,sincetherealpart is constructedby thescalarproductof thetwoeigenvectorcomponents.
* In its imaginaryparttheprojectorentrygivesameasureof thedivergenceofbehavior, sincetheimaginarypartis theabsolutevalueof thecrossproductbetweentheeigenvectorcomponents.
As anexampleusetheprojector� ó Ì in Eq.(3.67).� ó Ì @ � . fó Ñ f ± fó Ñ f =fó Ñ f ± . . .fó Ñ f = . . . � (3.67)
36 CHAPTER3
As will beexplainedin section4.3.2it alsoyieldsanadditionalinterpretationin thecontext of communicationpatternanalysis.
3.3.6 Perturbation Theory for Hermitian Operators
Thebehavior underperturbationiswell researchedfor Hermitianoperators[Kat95],[DS88] . And sincethis is amajoradvantageof theproposedmethodwhenthink-ing of futurework in this field, a very shortintroductionat leastfor perturbationof eigenvaluesis given.
Now assumean unperturbedHermitian matrix�
with eigenvalues K f � ¦<¦<¦ �K b , with K f á ¦<¦<¦ á K b anda Hermitianperturbationmatrix�
with eigenvalues� f � ¦<¦<¦ � � b , with � f á ¦<¦<¦ á � b . For theeigenvalues� f � ¦<¦<¦ � � b , with
� f á ¦`¦<¦ á� b of theresultingHermitianmatrix' @ � � � aWeyl typeperturbationbound
is givenby
K «i� � f á � « á K «i� � b (3.68)
See [HJ90,p.181-182], [Kat95,p.61]or [Mey00, p.551-552].The Bauer-Fike boundin Eq.( 3.69) for diagonalizablematricescanbe used
to giveanevenbetterboundfor Hermitianperturbations[HJ90, p.367-370]:
lG3M0/ � � � � k~K �¸�& � & I21 0íÒ¼4 & � & (3.69)
with1 0�Ò¼4¸@ & Ò &�& ÒQ9 f & for a matrix Ò of eigenvectors,wherethe inverse
existswhich is thecasefor thematrix of eigenvectorsof a Hermitianmatrix. ForHermitianmatricesthe Bauer-Fike boundin Eq.( 3.69) even reducesto
& � &,
since1 0�Ò¼4S@ - . Sincethematrix Ò is orthogonal( Ò ° @ Ò 9 f ) and
& Ò & @ -due to orthonormality. Thus Hermitian matricesare well conditioned [HJ90,p.528]whichhasalreadybeenmentionedin section 3.3.4.
With theseboundsit would be possibleto checkif andhow a matrix'
isthe resultof a perturbation
�. This will beof someinterestin chapter 4, when
theconstructionandbehavior of complex Hermitianadjacency matricesandtheirrespectiveeigensystemswill bediscussed.SinceaHermitianmatrix
'canberep-
resentedby a Fouriersumof its subspaces,theaddends,orderedby their weights(the correspondingeigenvalues)canbe seenasan approximationof a perturba-tion. Theaddendwith a relative high weightcanbeseenastheunperturbedma-trix, with all otheraddendsasperturbationmatrices.This interpretationis highlyconvinient, whenthefirst oneor two subspacesalreadycover a largepartof thevariance.
CHAPTER3 37
3.4 Eigensystemof realadjacencymatrices for non-dir ectionalgraphs
For real valuedadjacency matricesextensive literatureaboutthe correspondingeigensystemsof graphscanbe found in Cvetkovic et al. [CS97]. As discussedthereintheeigenspectrumof a graphdoesnot identify thegraphuniquely, sincecospectrality, which means“having the sameeigenspectrum”,doesnot lead toisomorphism,whichmeans“having thesamegraphstructure”in thiscontext. Butif, in addition,theeigenspacesaretakeninto accounttheuniquenessof theeigen-systemcanbeestablished.As areferencefor laterusein chapter4.4,someresultsabouteigensystemsof certainkinds of graphsfrom Cvetkovic will be presentedwithoutproof.
Star graph
Let 3 be a stargraphas in Fig.(3.4)with 4 vertices � � � +¢@ - � E � ) � 4 . Furtherlet � f be thecenterof thatstar. Thenthenormedeigensystemof therealvaluedadjacency matrix
� @ ����� � �U�ª� @ - if �U0V+ � ,34�� � else ����� @j. hastheform asin Tab. 3.3.
1
2 3
4
Figure3.4: Non directionalstargraph
��k
� � ��tw f ��tw ± ��qw = �tw 51 1.73 0.71 0.41 0.41 0.412 -1.73 0.71 0.41 0.41 0.413 0 0 0.82 0.82 0.824 0 0 0.82 0.82 0.82
Table3.3: Eigensystemof astargraphin Fig.( 3.4)
38 CHAPTER3
As canbeseen,thereis onepair of non-zeroeigenvalueswith thesameabso-lutevaluebut differentsign(eigenvalue
� frw ± @6-�-�¦87�) (Eq.(3.63))).Theeigenvec-tors for the two nonzeroeigenvaluesshow, that thevertex � f hasa highervaluethantheothervertices,who haveequalabsolutevalues.This is intuitive in a star,thecenteris perceivedasthestrongestmember, while all theothersareperceivedto be lessrelevant in comparisonbut equallyrelevantamongstthemselves. Thisresultqualitatively correspondsto theresultfrom thedegreecentralitymeasureinEq.(3.2),whichyields a ] f @Y- � a ]± w = w 5 @Y- z ) .CompleteGraph
Let û bea completegraphasin Fig.(3.5)againwith 4 verticeslabeledasabove.Theeigensystemthenis givenin Tab. 3.4.
1
2 3
4
Figure3.5: Non directionalcompletegraph
k� ��tw f ��qw ± �tw = ��tw 5
1 3.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.502 -1.00 0 0.87 0.87 0.873 -1.00 0 0.87 0.87 0.874 -1.00 0 0.87 0.87 0.87
Table3.4: Eigensystemof acompletegraphin Fig.( 3.5)
This eigensystemsshows only onemaximaleigenvalue,while all the othershavethesameabsolutevalueandeventhesamesign.Theeigenvectorcomponentsof themaximaleigenvalueshow thatall verticesareof equalrelevance.
The star graphand the completegraphare two graphswhich representthetwo extremecommunicationpatternsfor group structures. A group can eitherbeextremelyconnected,ergo a completegraph,or stronglycentered,ergo a star.Thereexist all kindsof mixtures,andin additiontherecanalsobeisolatedvertices
CHAPTER3 39
within groups. But in the context of this book, all membershave at leastoneconnectionwithin thegroup. This is why isolatedverticesneednot bediscussedhere.
As wasshown in thischapter, theuseof complex Hermitianmatriceshasmanyadvantageswhencalculatingtheeigensystem.Theseare:
* Realeigenvalues
* Orthogonaleigenvectorsystem[ orthogonalprojectors
* Well conditionedmatrices
* Innerproductnorm
* Fouriersumrepresentation
Therelevanceof thesepropertiesfor thepurposeof interpretingthestructureof emailcommunicationwill beshown in thenext chapter.
Chapter 4
Analysis of GeneralBidir ectionalCommunication Patterns
This chapterdealsin section 4.1 with the codingof bidirectionalcommunica-tion patternsin a weightedadjacency matrix. In section 4.2 it is shown how acomplex Hermitianadjacency matrixcanbededucedfrom aweighteddirectionalgraphin a socialnetwork. Section 4.3 givesan interpretationof the resultsob-tainedin chapter3 in thecontext of bidirectionalcommunicationpatternanalysis.Section 4.4givessomeexamplesof designedsyntheticcommunicationmatricesandshows how theproposedmethodcanbeusedto analyzethecommunicationstructurehiddenin thesematrices.
4.1 Communication Behavior
In thefollowing we considerbidirectionalcommunicationpatternswhich canbemodeledasa directedandweightedgraph
@ ������������� asdescribedin section3.1.1.Let � � and � � bevertices(members)of thegroup( � � � � � � � ). Thecommu-nicationgoing from � � to � � andfrom � � to � � will be transformedinto theentry����� in thematrix
�.
Thusthefollowing possibilitiesfor communicationbetweentwo verticesmayarise:
* No self reference:����� @�. � Ö +* + and , communicate:������R@Ä.
– + communicateswith , on thesamelevel
– + writesmoreoftento , thenviceversa
– , writesmoreoftento + thenviceversa
41
42 CHAPTER4
Codingthecommunicationbetweenvertices+ and , is a problemin SNA, aslong as ����� � � , becauseonly one informationcanbe codedin a real numberinsteadof thenumberof messagessentfrom + to , andvice versa. It is usuallyachievedby makinga choiceof whatto code,e.g.only thedifferencein commu-nication,or thepredominantdirection,. . .andchoiceimpliesinformationloss.Asolutionto this problemis to regardthesetwo componentsasa two componentvectorin a2 dimensionalplane.Thusthisrealtwo componentvectorcanbetrans-formedinto a complex number, asexplainedin section3.3.1. As a consequence�U�ª� � � Ö + � , . Theasymmetryof communicationbehavior is thecharacteristic,whichhasto bedealtwith, whentrying to find feasiblesolutionswith eigensystemanalysis.
4.2 ComplexHermitian AdjacencyMatrix
The amount of outboundcommunicationof a vertex + is translatedinto thereal part of the matrix entry, @ »��U0 ����� 4 , whereasthe amount/ of inboundcommunicationof vertex + is denotedasthe imaginarypart, / @ £ ¼0 ����� 4 . Thusthe characteristicsof complex numbersasdescribedin section 3.3.1Eq.( 3.13)now have thefollowing interpretation:
* The absolutevaluecorrespondsto the traffic volumeexchangedbetweentwo members.
* Thephase 0 ����� 4 representstherelativedirectionof thecommunication.
Thecomplex adjacency matrix�
hasentriesasgivenin Tab.( 4.1):
communicationbehavior �U�ª� @¡ � Gæ/  0 ����� 4no self reference ����� @¡. arbitrary+�[ , ÿ ,[ + ÿ / 9 . ��:5 9,�[ + ÿ +O[ , � / ; : 5 �+: ± ;+�[ ,@�,[ + @ / : 5Table4.1: Communicationbehavior representation
The entriesof the complex adjacency matrix�
canbe completedby followingEq.4.1:
����� @ÄG ���÷� (4.1)
Theconstructionof thematrix�
is thusgivenby Eq.4.2
CHAPTER4 43
� @6! � G<! � � with u ��� � � (4.2)
with ! representingtheweightedrealvaluedadjacency matrix,thustheentriesof! reflectthenumberof messageswhichgo from vertex + to vertex , .In Fig.( 4.1) a samplecommunicationcanbe seen.The pointsrepresentthe
matrix entries �U�ª� of a samplematrix given in Eq.( 4.1). The diagonalline hasbeendrawn to demonstratetheunderlyingsymmetry.
Re = Outbound
Im = Inbound
mk
pk o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Figure4.1: Communicationbehavior beforerotation
It caneasilybe seenaswell from Eq.( 4.1) asfrom Fig.( 4.1) that�
canbetransformedinto a Hermitianmatrix
'by rotation.Rotationis achievedby mul-
tiplying�
following Eq.(3.15).Therotationfactoris � 9U^>= ? asshown in Eq.(4.3).
' @ �A@ � 9U^ = ? (4.3)
Proof:
1. Let theentryof�
beany complex number����� @¡ï>�`^º¹ with absolutevalue ïandphase
Â.
2. Thenby Eq.(4.1) �U�÷� @¡G �U�ª� @ÄGVï���9U^º¹3. �U�ª� @�.�@�Ñ ��� becauseof theexclusionof self references
4. After rotationaboutB : Ñ ��� @ ����� �`^8CN@¡ï��`^º¹´�`^8CN@¡ï��`^Ë�e¹ F C �5. Ñ �÷� @ ���÷� �`^8C�@ÄG3ï>��9U^�¹��`^�C�@�� ^>= Í ï>�`^Ë�DC³95¹ �6. ForHermitianmatricesÑ �ª� @ Ñ �÷� musthold(Eq.(3.20),therefore,ï��`^Ë��¹ F C � @ï>��9U^Ë�<= Í F C595¹ � .
44 CHAPTER4
7. Thisholds,if � B @Yk : ± kEB �  .
8. Solvingfor B leadsto E�B~@Ck : ± . Thus BÏ@Ck : 5 . qed
The alternative way given by Chino yields a matrix that is similar to'
inEq.(4.3).Theproof is thefollowing:
Let'GF @ f± 0(! � !��34 � G f± 0,!Ák�!��W4 by Eq.(3.22)and
'GH @¬0,! � G<!��34Î� 9U^I= ?by Eqs.(4.2, 4.3) then:
'GF @ -E 0,! � ! � 4 � G -E 0(!YkJ! � 4@ -E 0,! � GI! � ! � kÏG<! � 4@ -E 0,!l0�- � Gr4 � ! � 0-XkÏGr4Î4@ À EE 0,!¿� ^>= ? � ! � � 9U^I= ? 4@ À EE 0,! � ! � � 9U^>= Í 4� ^>= ? � � 9U^>= Í @Ck®G@ À EE 0,!¾kÐG<! � 4Î� ^>= ?@ À EE 'GH
(4.4)
with'GH
representingthecomplex conjugatedmatrixof'KH
.This leadsto aneigensystemthatis complex conjugatedandscaledby a con-
stantto theonepresented.As will beseenlaterin section 4.3.2theinterpretationof theorthogonalprojectorswill bemoreintuitive andrevealingwith thematrixgivenby Eq.(4.3) thanwith themethodproposedby Chino. In additionthecom-parisonwith theoriginal adjacency matrix is noteasyto achieve,sincemorethanabackrotationis neededin thecaseof Chino.
Tab.( 4.2) shows how the communicationbehavior patternsof Tab.( 4.1) re-mainvisible in therotatedmatrix
'with entriesÑ ��� aftertherotation:
1. No self reference:Ñ ��� @�.2. More outboundthaninboundtraffic ( + [ , ÿ ,Z[ + ) leadsto a negative
signof theimaginarypart /�L½@ £ ¼03Ñ �ª� 4 � .3. More inboundthanoutboundtraffic ( ,®[ + ÿ +Ð[ , ) leadsto a positive
sign /�L½@ £ ¼0VÑ ��� 4 ÿ .
CHAPTER4 45
Re
Im
mk
pk
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-pk
Inbound
Outbound
Figure4.2: Communicationbehavior afterrotation
4. Outboundequalsinboundtraffic ( +©[ ,�@¡,�[ + ): /MLþ@¡.Fig.( 4.2)showshow thedatapointsin Fig.( 4.1)behaveunderrotation.
Note that the norm is invariantunderrotation. The absolutevalue- that is therepresentationof theamountof of communication- doesnotchange.
communicationbehavior ����� @¢ � G{/ Ñ �ª� @Ä NL � Gæ/�Lno self reference ����� @Ä. Ñ ��� @Ä.+O[ , ÿ ,�[ + ÿ / /�L � .,�[ + ÿ +�[ , � / /�L ÿ .+O[ ,@�,�[ + @Ï/ /�L½@�. , NL ÿ .
Table4.2: Communicationbehavior representationin thematrix'
4.3 Inter pretation of the Eigensystem
In thissectiontheinterpretationof thecomponentsof theeigensystemof thecom-plex Hermitianadjacency matricesintroducedin section4.2will bediscussed.In
46 CHAPTER4
the following the solutionof the eigensystem' @ � is considered.First, in
section 4.3.1theeigenspectrumwill be interpretedin the light of the input data,then,in subsection4.3.2,the interpretationof eigenvectorsandtheresultingor-thogonalprojectorswill beexplained.
4.3.1 Eigenspectrum
Sincethe input dataconsistsof inboundandoutboundmessages,theeigenspec-trumreflectsthe“energy” level, or traffic level within thedataset,since� � � @ &(' & @ & � &is the spectralradiusfollowing Eq.( 3.42). Thus
�changeswith the numberof
messagesexchanged.�
doesnotrevealif thenumberof in- or outboundmessageshaschanged.
The eigenvaluecanbe interpretedfollowing Eq.( 3.57) asthe weight of thecorrespondingeigenspace,thusit is alsopermissibleto seeit astheweight of apatternthat servesasa corrective perturbationor patternon themostprominenteigenspace.If now
� ± � . and� fþÿ . or viceversaandtheanchorcorresponding
to� f and
� ± is thesame,thenthecorrectionthat thepatterncorrespondingto� ±
bringsputsa strongerfocuson a characteristicwithin thecommunicationof thewholegroup.Thesignof theeigenvalueyieldsinformationif thecommunicationbehavior demonstratedby the subspaceis the patternwith the subgroup,or thecommunicationpatternthatthesubgroupmaintainsto therestof thegroup.For anexampleseesubsection4.4.3.This couldbeseenasa kind of filtering function.Whenthe secondsubspaceweightedby its eigenvalue is addedto the first, thestrongestpatternreceivesa modulation. The sign of the eigenvaluealsoyieldsinformation.
As wasshown in section 3.3.4,thespectrumexhibits a symmetryfor undis-turbedstargraphs.If thestaris beingperturbed,thesymmetrybreaksdown. Thismeansthat if, for example,a groupshows thecommunicationbehavior of a stargraph,additionalcrosscommunicationtakestherole of a perturbationaslong asit is smallcomparedto communicationin thestar. This is analogin thecaseof acompletegraph. In this casefor exampleonesidedcommunicationor very littlecommunicationbetweentwo nodestakestheform of aperturbation.
4.3.2 Eigenvectorsand orthogonal projectors
The absolutevalueof the eigenvectorcomponentsis the well known eigenvec-tor centrality index (seeBonacichandLloyd [BL01]). In this context this in-dex canbeinterpretedasa similarity in communicationpatternamongthegroupmembers.Thusthecomponentwith highestabsolutevaluecanbeinterpretedasthehighestrankedmemberwithin thatpattern.This hasbeendefinedin section
CHAPTER4 47
3.1.1as the anchorof the subgroup. The phaseinformationof the eigenvectorcomponentsgivesinformationaboutthedirectionalsimilarity comparedwith theanchorwithin thesubgroup.This meansthat thephaseshows,how thedirectionof communicationof the vertex is similar to the directionof the anchorin thatpattern. The anchorcanbe definedto have a phaseof
 @Ü. , the phaseof allothercomponentsis a relative information. If for exampletheeigenvectorshowsthedistributionof absolutevaluesthatrepresentastarlikepattern,thenthephasegivesanindicationof thedirectionof thepattern(inboundor outboundstar).
The orthogonalprojectorsare the bridge betweeneigenvectorsandoriginaladjacency matrix. As hasbeenexplainedalreadyin section 3.3.5,the real partof theprojectorconsistsof thescalarproductof theeigenvectorcomponents,thusgiving an index for similarity. While the imaginarypart consistsof theabsoluteamountof thecrossproductof theeigenvectorcomponents,thusgiving anindexof skewness.Sincetheprojectorsarepartsof theFouriersumandthusarepartoftheoriginaladjacency matrix, it followsthatthenumberof outboundmessagesinthe original matrix is connectedto the scalarproductof theeigenvectorcompo-nents,while thenumberof inboundmessagesis connectedto theabsolutevalueof thecrossproductof theeigenvectorcomponents.
4.4 Examplesof Eigensystems
After having thusdescribedtheconstructionof thecomplex Hermitianadjacencymatrix, this sectionwill presentsomeexamples,which are designedso as todemonstratehow themethodsworks.
As anintroductionto eigensystemsof complex Hermitianadjacency matricesthegraphpatternsusedin section.(3.4) will beused.All calculationshave beenperformedwith Mathematica[Wol03]. Thishasthefollowing consequences:
* Eigenvectorsarenotnormalized.
* In Mathematicatheeigenvectorshave beenrotatedto resultin a phaseof .for theeigenvectorcomponentwith the largestabsolutevalue. But this, asexplainedin section.3.3.4Eq.(3.56),doesnot disturbtheorthogonalityoftheeigenspaces.
* Eigenvalueshave beennormalizedby dividing eacheigenvalue with thematrixnorm.Thusthelargesteigenvalueis equalto � - � .
To show how the results,theenhancedmethodsprovidescanbe interpreted,theanalognon-directionalgraphswill beconsideredfirst,andthentheasymmetric
48 CHAPTER4
versionwill be discussed.The analogonto a non-directionalgraphis a bidirec-tionalbut equallyweightedgraph.For validationtheresultsof Cvetkovic [CS97]in thecaseof stargraphsandcompletegraphswill beused.
Threekindsof graphswill bediscussed:
* Thestargraph(subsection4.4.1)
* Thecompletegraph(subsection4.4.2)
* A graph representingtwo subgroupsconnectedby one link (subsection4.4.3)
4.4.1 Star Graph
The equivalentof a non-directionalstar graphin the complex representationisshown in Fig.( 4.3). Thecorrespondingcomplex adjacency matrix
�POis givenin
Eq.(4.5)andtherotatedmatrix� L ]V�� is givenin Eq.(4.6).
1
2 3
4
1
1 1
1
1 1
Figure4.3: Equivalentto non-directionalstargraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.5)
�PO @ �QQ . - � G - � GA- � G- � G . . .- � G . . .- � G . . . �RR� (4.5)
� L ]V�O @ ' O @ �QQ . ->¦D4¤- -�¦S4¤- -�¦S4¤--�¦D4:- . . .-�¦D4:- . . .-�¦D4:- . . . �RR� (4.6)
The eigensystemof the rotatedmatrix� L ]V�O @ ' O is given in Tab.( 4.3). Since
therotatedmatrix hasentriesÑ ��� � � theresultingeigensystemfor thenon-zeroeigenvaluesis the same(modulo
Ê) asthat in Tab.( 3.3), eigenvalueshave been
CHAPTER4 49
normalized.Thiseigensystemshowsthefirst two eigenvalueswith sameabsolutevalue,but with differentsign.Thecorrespondingeigenvectorsarerealin thiscaseandshow aphasedifferenceof exactly
Ê(in thiscaseadifferentsign),apartfrom
the largestabsoluteeigenvectorcomponent.Characteristicfor a stargraphis thefact that two eigenvaluesof thesameabsolutevaluebut with differentsignexist,andthat the distribution of the absolutevalueof the eigenvectorcomponentsissuchthatthecenterof thestarhasthehighestvalue,while all othermembershavea lowerbut equallydistributedvalue.
+ � � ��tw �,@C- ,�@8E ,�@6) ,@T4
1 -1.0 0.71 -0.41 -0.41 -0.412 1.0 0.71 0.41 0.41 0.413 0 0 -0.58 -0.21 0.794 0 0 -0.58 0.79 -0.21
Table4.3: Eigensystemfor' O
in Eq.(4.6)
Theeigensystemin Tab.( 4.3)corresponds(moduloÊ
) for thenon-zeroeigen-valueswith theresultsof Cvetkovic et al. [CS97,p.235].
If the star is perturbedwithin the star, which meansthat additionalcommu-nicationtakesplacebetweenthealreadyconnectedmembersof thenetwork, theonly effect is achangein theabsolutevalueof theeigenvalues,sinceby Eq.(3.42)only
&S' &becomeslarger, but no additionalmembersgetconnected.If thestar
is subjectedto asymmetricperturbationasin Fig.( 4.4)betweenverticesE and ) ,which meansthatthematrix entries� ± = and � = ± aredifferentfrom . asmatrix
� Ýin Eq.(4.7)shows,
� Ý @ �QQ . - � GA- � G - � G- � G . - � G .- � GA- � G . .- � G . . . �RR� (4.7)
thefollowing effectscanbeobservedin theeigensystemgivenin Tab.( 4.4):
* The symmetryfor the largest two eigenvaluesbreaksdown accordingtoEq.(3.69):
ò ó Í9 / Í òëVU�ë @ ò 9 �XW Y>Z F f>W � òf>W 5�f @¾.³¦�E�E I - , with�
beingtheperturbationmatrixwith only theentries� ± = � � = ± R@�. .* Theeigenvectorsloosetheir symmetry, which meansthat theeigenvectorsof thetwo largesteigenvaluesdonothavethesameweightsanymoreaswellasthefact that theeigenvectorcomponentfor vertex + in eacheigenvectordoesnotonly changethesign,whichwouldmeanaphaseshift of
Ê(which
50 CHAPTER4
is equivalentto arotationby -\[>.^] counterclockwiseor theratiobetweenthecircumferenceû of acircleandits diameter2 giving
F � @T):¦{-�4X¦<¦<¦ .* The distribution of the eigenvector componentswithin eacheigenvector
loosesits starlikecharacteristic.Theanchoris still visible,but thebehaviorof theotherverticeschanges.
1
2 3
4
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
Figure4.4: Symmetricalperturbationof non-directionalstargraphrepresentedinEq.(4.7)
+ � � ��qw �,�@Y- ,�@ÄE ,�@T) ,�@24
1 1.0 0.61 0.52 0.52 0.282 -0.68 0.75 -0.3 -0.3 -0.513 -0.46 0 -0.71 0.71 04 0.14 0.25 -0.37 -0.37 0.82
Table 4.4: Eigensystemfor the perturbedstar in Eq.( 4.7) after rotation inFig.( 4.4)
In addition it canbe said, that if one reversesthe directionof the edgebe-tweentwo vertices,the eigenvaluesarekept, but the eigenvectorsbecomecom-plex conjugated.This canbeseenif thestargraphis subjectedto anasymmetricperturbationasin Fig.( 4.5)
CHAPTER4 51
1
2 3
4
1
1 1
1
11
1
Figure4.5: Asymmetricperturbationof anon-directionalstar
Theeigensystemof thegraphin Fig.(4.5)representedbymatrix�`_
in Eq.(4.8)is given in Tab.( 4.5). In the caseof the perturbationin the otherdirection,theeigensystembehavesaspredicted(seeTab.( 4.6)).
�`_ @ �QQ . - � G - � G - � G- � G . - .- � G G . .- � G . . . �RR� (4.8)
52 CHAPTER4
a bXcd
ef bgVh b cig jk h b cilgVh bXcmg jk h b cmlgVh b cng jk h bXcnlgVh b cog jk h b col
11.
00.
650
0.48
-0.2
0.48
0.2
0.33
02
-0.8
40.
710
0.40
-2.7
0.40
2.7
0.43
3.1
3-0
.30
0.20
1.4
0.65
2.8
0.65
00.
34-1
.74
0.13
0.20
00.
432.
60.
43-2
.60.
770
Tabl
e4.
5:E
igen
syst
emfo
rth
epe
rtur
beds
tarw
ithas
ymm
etric
com
mun
icat
iong
iven
inF
ig.(
4.5)
a b cd
ef bg h b cig jk h bXcilg h b cmg jk h b cmlgVh b cng jk h b cnlgVh b cog jk h b col
11.
00.
650
0.48
0.2
0.48
-0.2
0.33
02
-0.8
40.
710
0.40
2.7
0.40
-2.7
0.43
-3.1
3-0
.30
0.20
-1.4
0.65
-2.8
0.65
00.
341.
74
0.13
0.20
00.
43-2
.60.
432.
60.
770
Tabl
e4.
6:E
igen
syst
emfo
rth
epe
rtur
beds
tara
sin
Fig
.(4.
5)in
reve
rsed
dire
ctio
n
CHAPTER4 53
Theeigensystemalsoindicatesthelocationof theperturbingevent.Thephaseof theeigenvectorcomponents
 0 %frw ± 4 and 0 % ± w ± 4 aswell as
 0 %frw = 4 and 0 % ± w = 4
nolongershow aphaseshift ofÊ
ascanbeseenin Tabs.(4.5, 4.6).Thisis exactlywheretheperturbationtookplace.
Theeigenvaluesleadto cumulative coveredvarianceasin Tab.( 4.7). As canbeseenthefirst two subspacescoveralreadyover D�.qp of thevariance.Theeigen-projectorsderived from the eigensystemin Tab.( 4.5) are given by Eqs.(4.9 –4.12). The projectors��� � +¢@ - � E � ) � 4 are thosecorrespondingto eigenvalues� � � +O@Y- � E � ) � 4 . � f � ± � = � 5
coveredvariancepereigenvalue .³¦�B�B .:¦D)�D .:¦p.�B .:¦e.³-cumulativecoveredvariance .³¦�B�B .:¦pD+4 .:¦pD�D -�¦e.>.
Table4.7: Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 4.6)
Thefirst two projectors�Lf and � ± have thefollowing interpretation:
* Theanchoris identifiedby thehighestabsolutevalueanidentifiedasvertex- . / � f3�frf @j.:¦S4UE and / � ± �frf @j.:¦eB>. , where/ � ���«Î� representstheelementin row +andcolumn , of matrix �1� .*r�Lf correspondsto thehighestabsolutevaluedeigenvalue,thusmoretraffic
is beingexchangedin thatpatternand � ± servesasthecorrectivepattern.Ifonetakesinto accountthat
� ± � . , it canbe seenthat thesecondpattern,whenaddedasdescribedby theFouriersum,hastheeffect thatthediagonalentriesof thesumwill go towards. or below, andthattheentriesin thefirstrow andfirst columnwill beaugmented,while theentriesin thesubmatrix/ � f3� F � ± �±r± ¦<¦<¦3/ � f3� F � ± �5>5 will tendtowards . . This thenalreadycomescloseto astarlikeadjacency matrix.
* Thepatternin �Lf representsthefact thatall membersareconnectedwith aslight tendency towardsa star. Only � ± showsastrongerstararoundvertex- , sinceall othermatrix entriesare lower by half at least. This suggeststhat �Lf representsthe communicationwithin the whole group, while � ±representsthecommunicationwithin thestar.
�Lf @ �QQ .:¦S4UE .:¦D):-Zk~.:¦p.^s>G�.:¦D):- � .:¦p.^s>G .³¦�E³-.:¦�)³- � .:¦p.^s>G .:¦eE+) .:¦eE�E � .:¦p.�D>G .:¦{-\s � .³¦e.^)�G.:¦D):-Zk~.:¦p.^s>G�.:¦eE�EÕk~.:¦p.�D>G .:¦eE+) .:¦{-\sSk~.:¦p.^)>G.:¦eE³- .:¦{-\sSk~.:¦p.^)>G�.:¦{-\s � .:¦p.^)>G .³¦æ-�- RR� (4.9)
54 CHAPTER4
� ± @ �QQ .:¦eB>. kÕ.³¦�E+s�kÏ.³¦æ-�-`G k .:¦eE+s � .:¦{-�-<G k .:¦D)�.k .:¦eE+s � .:¦{-�-<G .:¦{-\s .:¦{-�-XkÏ.:¦{-"E�G .:¦{-\sSk~.:¦p.q7�Gk .:¦eE+s�k~.:¦{-�-<G .:¦{-�- � .:¦{-"E�G .:¦{-\s .:¦{-\s � .³¦e.q7´Gk .:¦D)�. .:¦{-\s � .:¦p.q7�G .:¦{-\s�kÏ.:¦p.q7�G .³¦æ-\[ �RR� (4.10)
� = hasvertex ) asanchor, but vertex E hasthe sameabsolutevalue,whichcanbeinterpretedasa structuralsimilarity betweenthetwo. Only thedifferencein phaseshows thatcomparedto vertex ) thatvertex E hasa slight differenceindirectionof communication.
� = @ �QQ .:¦e.�4 .:¦e.�E � .:¦{-\)>G .:¦p.�EÕk~.:¦{-\)>G kÕ.³¦e.q7.³¦e.�EÕk~.³¦æ-\)�G .:¦S4UE k .:¦D4�.�k~.³¦æ-�4>G k .:¦p.+4 � .:¦eE�E�G.³¦e.�E � .:¦æ-�)>G k .:¦S4�. � .:¦{-�4�G .³¦D4UE kÕ.:¦p.+4�k~.:¦eE�E�Gk .:¦p.q7 kÕ.:¦p.+4�k~.:¦eE�E�G kÕ.³¦e.+4 � .:¦�E>E�G .:¦{-"E �RR� (4.11)
In �t5 vertex 4 is theanchorandverticesE and ) againhave thesameabsolutevaluebut differentphase.
�u5 @ �QQ .:¦p.+4¤- kÕ.:¦p.q7 � .³¦e.�B´G k .:¦p.q7Sk~.:¦p.�B�G .³¦æ-\sk .:¦e.^7�k~.³¦e.�B´G .:¦{-\[ .³¦e.q7 � .:¦{-v7�G kÕ.³¦�E+[�kÏ.³¦æ-\[�GkÕ.³¦e.q7 � .:¦e.�B�G .:¦p.q7SkÏ.:¦{-v7�G .:¦{-\[ kÕ.³¦�E+[ � .:¦æ-�[>G.³¦æ-\s kÕ.:¦eE+[ � .³¦æ-\[�G k .:¦eE+[�k~.:¦{-\[>G .³¦�B>D RR�(4.12)
Now consideradirectedandweightedstargraphof anasymmetriccommuni-cationbetween5 membersor verticesasin Fig.( 4.6).
1
2 3
45
2
1 2
3
2
1
1
1
Figure4.6: Asymmetricstargraph
The original complex adjacency matrix�wOyx
correspondingto the graphinFig.( 4.6) is givenin Eq.(4.13).
CHAPTER4 55
�POvx @ �QQQQ. - � E�G E � )>G E � G - � GE � G . . . .) � E�G . . . .- � E�G . . . .- � G . . . .
�RRRR� (4.13)
After rotation�wOyx
becomestheHermitianmatrix' Oyx
:
� L ]V�Oyx @ ' Oyx @ �QQQQ. E³¦{- � .³¦87�Gz):¦eB � .:¦�7�G E³¦{-XkÏ.:¦�7�GA-�¦D4E³¦{-®k~.³¦87�G . . . .):¦eB�k~.³¦87�G . . . .E³¦æ- � .:¦87´G . . . .-�¦S4 . . . .
RRRR� (4.14)
The correspondingeigensystemis given in two different representationstomakecertainaspectsmorevisible. To givea betterview of theeffect of perturba-tion on theeigenvaluesno normalizationhasbeenperformed.As canbeseeninbothTab.( 4.8)andTab.( 4.9) therearetwo non-zeroeigenvaluesof thesameab-solutevalue( � � fn� @ � � ± � @¾B³¦e. ) but with differentsign(
� f{� . � � ± ÿ . ). As wasshown in Eq.( 3.63)this is indeedthecharacteristicof theadjacency matrix of astargraph.As canalsobeseentheeigenvectorsbelongingto thetwo eigenvaluesarethe samein absolutevaluesbut differ by
Êin phaseasshown in Eq.( 3.65).
Note that the entry in the first row (vertex - ) is the centerof the stargraphandis indicatedassuchby theeigenvectorcomponentof thehighestabsolutevalue.This membercanthusbe describedasthe mostcentralandprestigiousmemberof thegroup,ergo theanchor. It canalsobeseenthattheentryin row 3 (memberwith ID 3) hasthesecondhighestabsoluteeigenvectorcomponent,which meansthatthis vertex hasastrongsimilarity in behavior comparedto vertex - .
� � � f � ± � = � 5 � x-5.0 5.0 0 0 0�tw f 0.71 0.71 0 0 0�tw ± -0.3+0.1i 0.30-0.10i -0.27+0.09i -0.36+0.27i 0.72�tw = -0.5+0.1i 0.50-0.1i -0.14+0.03i -0.19+0.11i -0.64-0.08i�tw 5 -0.3-0.1i 0.30+0.10i -0.08-0.03i 0.86 0.18+0.13i�tw x -0.2 0.20 0.94 -0.08+0.03i 0.13+0.04i
Table4.8: Eigensystemfor' Oyx
in Eq.(4.14)with ·¿@ �Õ� G�u
56 CHAPTER4
� � � f � ± � = � 5 � x-5.0 5.0 7Á. 0 0� · �  03·�4 � · �  0W·�4 � · �  0W·�4 � · �  0W·�4 � · �  03·�4��tw f 0.71 0 0.71 0 0 undef 0 undef 0 undef��tw ± 0.32 2.82 0.32 -0.32 0.28 2.82 0.45 2.50 0.72 0��tw = 0.51 2.94 0.51 -0.20 0.14 2.94 0.22 2.62 0.64 -3.02��tw 5 0.32 -2.82 0.32 0.32 0.087 -2.82 0.86 0 0.22 0.64��tw x 0.20Ê
0.20 0 0.94 0 0.09 2.82 0.14 0.32
Table4.9: Eigensystemfor' Ovx
in Eq.(4.14)with ·¿@ � · � � ^�¹"��| �
1
2 3
45
2
1 2
3
2
1
1
1
2
2
Figure4.7: Perturbedstargraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.15)
Now considera symmetricperturbationof the form given in Fig.( 4.7) with therespectivematrix
�POvx Ýin Eq.(4.15).
�POvx Ý @ �QQQQ. - � E�G E � )>G E � GA- � GE � G . E � E�G . .) � E´G¯E � E�G . . .- � E´G . . . .- � G . . . .
RRRR� (4.15)
whichafterrotationbecomestheHermitianmatrix' Oyx Ý
in Eq.(4.16):
� L ]V�Oyx Ý @ ' Ovx Ý @ �QQQQ. E³¦æ- � .:¦87´G})³¦�B � .³¦87�G E³¦{-XkÏ.:¦�7�GA-�¦S4E³¦{-XkÏ.:¦�7�G . E³¦�[ . .):¦eBSkÏ.:¦�7�G E³¦D[ . . .E³¦{- � .:¦�7�G . . . .-�¦S4 . . . .
RRRR�(4.16)
CHAPTER4 57
� � � f � ± � = � 5 � x6.2 -4.5 -2.5 0.79 0��tw f 0.61 0.70 -0.26-0.01i 0.23-0.08i 0��tw ± 0.46-0.13i 0.03+0.07i 0.78 -0.34+0.21i 0��tw = 0.56-0.13i -0.57+0.07i -0.50-0.06i -0.25+0.17i 0��tw 5 0.21+0.07i -0.33-0.11i 0.22+0.08i 0.70 -0.51-0.17i��tw x 0.14 -0.22 0.15 0.42-0.14i 0.85
Table4.10:Eigensystemfor' Ovx Ý
in Eq.(4.16)with ·¿@ �S� GVu� � � f � ± � = � 5 � x6.2 -4.5 -2.5 0.79 0� · � Â 0W·�4 � · � Â 0W·�4 � · � Â 03·�4 � · � Â 03·�4 � · � Â 03·�4
0.61 0 0.70 0 0.27 -3.10 0.25 -0.32 0 undef0.48 -0.27 0.073 1.19 0.78 0 0.40 2.60 0 undef0.57 -0.22 0.58 3.02 0.50 -3.03 0.31 2.54 0 undef0.22 0.32 0.35 -2.82 0.23 0.37 0.70 0 0.53 -2.820.14 0 0.22
Ê0.15 0.04 0.44 -0.32 0.85 0
Table4.11:Eigensystemfor' Ovx Ý
in Eq.(4.16)with ·¿@ � · � �`^º¹"��| �Theeigensystembelongingto matrix
' Ovx Ýhastheform shown in Tabs.(4.10,
4.11).As canbeseenwhencomparingTab.( 4.9)andTab.( 4.11)theanchorsof the
first two eigenspacesdid notchange,while in therestof thesubspacestheanchorschanged.Theperturbationthushadeffectsnot in theoverall communicationpat-tern,but in thecorrective patterns.In Tab.( 4.12)thecoveredvarianceis shown.As canbeseenthefirst two eigenvaluesexplain already7¬D�.^p of thetotal vari-ance. � f � ± � = � 5 � x
coveredvariancepereigenvalue .:¦eB>D .:¦D):- .:¦æ- .:¦p.:- .cumulativecoveredvariance .:¦eB>D .:¦D[�D .:¦eD>D -�¦p.�. ->¦e.�.
Table4.12:Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 4.6)
Theprojectorsderivedfromtheeigensystemin Tab.( 4.10)aregivenin Eqs.(4.17)- ( 4.20).
58 CHAPTER4
~� � � i�� �������u����������� ������������ ������������������� ������
����� ����������������� ������������������������ �������
����� ������������ ����������������� �������������������
����� ������ ������ ������������ ����������������� �������
���������� ������������ �������������������������
� �������u�(4
.17)
~� � � m�� �������u������� ��� �� ���� ������ �� ���� ������ �������������
����� �������������� �� ��� � ������ ������� ������ �������
������ ������� ������� ������ ��� �������� �������� ��� �������
������ ������� ������� ������������� �� �������������� �� ����
������������ ������������ �� ��������� �������� ���
� �������u�(4
.18)
~� � � n�� �������u������������ �� ��������� ������� ������ ������� ������
������ �������� ��������� ������ �� ��� �� ��� ������
����� ������� ������ �� ��� ������������ �������������
������ ������������ �� ��� � ������ ����������������� �������
������� ���������� ������ ���������
� �������u�
(4.1
9)
~� � � o�� ������������������� ������� ������ �������� ��� �� ����� ���
����� �������� �������� ������� ������ ������ � �� ��� ������ �
������ ������������ ����������������� ������� �� ��� ������ �
� ��� ������� ������ �� ��� � ������ ����������������� �� ����
����������� �� ��� � ������ ������ �� ��� �� ����� ���
� ���������
(4.2
0)
CHAPTER4 59� Ovx Ýx doesnot contributeandhasbeenomitted.The interpretationof theprojectorsis similar to the interpretationof thepro-
jectorsfor the non-directionalstar. The starcanstill be seen,but the effectsofthe asymmetricbilateralcommunicationandthe perturbationaresuperimposed.Again it canbeseen,that � Oyx ݱ is therepresentative of thestar, while in � Oyx Ýf thecommunicationpatternseemsto point towardsa moreequallydistributedform.This againhasthe effect thatwhenboth subspacesareweightedandadded,thesecondsubspacewill enhancethestarlikepattern.
As predictedby Eq.(3.68)theeigenvaluesof matrix' Oyx
is now disturbed.Inthis intuitive exampletheconsequenceof theperturbationcanbe seenwhenweview
' Ovx Ýasthesumof theunperturbedmatrix
' OvxandtheHermitianperturba-
tion matrix � Oyx of theform
� Oyx @ �QQQQ. . . . .. . E � E�G�. .. E � E´G . . .. . . . .. . . . .
�RRRR� (4.21)
Theeigenvaluesof matrix � Ovx afterrotationare� � îv��� �f @¬E³¦D[ � � � îv��� �± @ kÕE³¦D[ .
Thusthe largesteigenvalueof� H �����f @�s:¦�E of theperturbedmatrix
' Ovx Ýshould
be insidethe Weyl-type boundsfollowing Eq.( 3.68)given by� H � �f � � � îv��� �f @B5¦e. � E³¦�[Ð@¡75¦�[ á s:¦eE á E³¦eEÐ@AB³¦p.�kÄE³¦D[Ï@ � H � �f � � � îv��� �± andthe smallest
eigenvalue� H �����± @¬k{4¤¦�B shouldbeinsidetheboundgivenby
� H ���± �ù� � � îv��� �f @kÕB � E³¦D[l@ kSE³¦eE á k{4¤¦eB á kÕB¿kmE5¦�[l@ kw7³¦D[}@ � H ���± �¡� � � îv��� �± . Tab.( 4.10)confirmsthis.
As canbe seen,the eigenvaluesrise in absoluteamount,dueto the fact thatmoretraffic volumehasoccurredwithin thegroup. This correspondsto the factthat the norm of the matrix
' Oyx Ýis greaterthan the norm of
' Ovx. Sincethe
norm of a Hermitianmatrix by Eq.( 3.42)definesthe spectralradiusthis meansanincreasein thelargesteigenvalueof
' Ovx Ý.
Note,thatdueto theperturbationthesymmetryof theeigenvaluesin Tab.( 4.8)is destroyed. In additiontheperturbationleadsto a breakin symmetrybetweenthe eigenvectors. The eigenvector componentsaffectedby the perturbationdono longershow the regular phaseshift of
Êanymore. For memberswith ID 2
and3 this is visible in Tab.( 4.11). However, a perturbedstargraphcanstill berecognizedby thefactthattherestill existsananchor, which canbeidentifiedbythehighestabsolutevalueeigenvectorcomponentin two eigenvectorsat thesameID position.
Matrix� ó Ì in Eq.(4.22)representstheproduct
� f�� Ovx Ýf . By adding,accordingto the Fourier sumthe product
� ± � Ovx ݱ we get matrix�� Í� � Ì ó ��¢"� in Eq.(( 4.23).
60 CHAPTER4
Theremainingpartialsum û ��� �v£ ó � ¢ � only coversabout -\p of thevariance.
� ó Ì @�QQQQ
E³¦�)³- -�¦�7�4 � .:¦D4�D>GÜE³¦{-"E � .:¦D4�D>G¯.³¦87>DSk~.³¦�E+s�G .:¦�B�)->¦87�4�kÏ.³¦D4�D�G -�¦D4�E ->¦87>.�kÏ.³¦e.^[�G .³¦�B�4�k~.³¦�)q7´G .³¦D4�.Sk~.³¦æ-�-`GE5¦æ-"ESkÏ.³¦D4�D�G ->¦87>.�kÏ.³¦e.^[�G E³¦e.�B .³¦�sq7Õk~.³¦D4¤-`G .³¦D4�DSk~.³¦æ-�-`G.:¦�7>D � .³¦�E+s�G¯.:¦eB�4 � .:¦�)^7�G .:¦Dsq7 � .:¦D4:-<G .:¦�)>. .:¦{-\[ � .:¦e.+s>G.:¦�B�) .:¦S4�. � .:¦æ->-<G .:¦S4�D � .:¦æ->-<G¯.³¦æ-\[Sk~.³¦e.^s�G .:¦æ-nE RRRR�
(4.22)
�� Í� � Ì ó � @
�QQQQ.:¦{- -�¦87 � .:¦87´G¤):¦pD � .:¦�7�G -�¦D[�k~.³¦�s>G -�¦�E-�¦�7Sk~.:¦�7�G -�¦S4 -�¦�7SkÏ.:¦{-<G�.:¦Ds�k~.³¦�)>G .:¦D4):¦pD�k~.:¦�7�GÜ-�¦�7�k~.³¦æ-<G .:¦Ds kÕ.:¦{- k .:¦{--�¦D[ � .:¦Ds>G .:¦�s � .:¦�)�G k .:¦æ- kÕ.:¦eE k .:¦{--�¦eE .:¦S4 k .:¦æ- kÕ.:¦{- k .:¦{-
RRRR� (4.23)
If we now rotatethis matrix backby � ^>= ? , thematrix�w¥ L ]V�� Í� � Ì ó � ¢ � in Eq.(4.24)
alreadylooksquitelike theoriginalmatrix� ± apartfrom theentries� ±r± � � ± 5 � �^5 ± .
This matrix could also be written as the original matrix�POvx
plus the originalperturbationmatrix � Oyx plus a matrix û in Eq.( 4.25) with the remainingnon-zeroentries.This û is thebackrotatedpartialsum û �
�� �v£ ó ��¢"� .
� ¥ L ]V�� Í� � Ì ó ��¢"� @ �QQQQ. - � E�G E � )>G E � -<GA- � -`GE � -<GA- � -<GA- � -<G - .) � E�GA- � -<G . . .- � E�G�. � -<G . . .- � -<G . . . .
�RRRR� (4.24)
û¾@ �QQQQ. . . . .. k�-Xkm-<GA- � -<GAk�- .. - � -<G . . .. k�-<G . . .. . . . .
�RRRR� (4.25)
As aconclusionit canbestatedthatastargraphlikestructurecanbeidentifiedif theeigensystemhasthefollowing characteristics:
* Two eigenvalueswith differentsign,but relatively equalor equalabsolutevalue (in comparisonto the other eigenvalues): � � �¾�§¦l� � � � � + � ,}@- � ¦<¦`¦ � M and + R@Ä, .
CHAPTER4 61
* Theeigenvectorsto theabove mentionedeigenvaluesfeaturethesamean-chor: � ï y ��%5«��n%��tw «�� @ � ï y ��% � �n%���w � � with H¸@Ä .* The distribution of absolutevaluesof eigenvectorcomponentsshows onehigh absolutevalueandthe rest is relatively lower. In the caseof a clearstar, all otherabsolutevaluesarethesame.
If thestaris clearlyidentifiable,it canevenbeventuredto constructanunper-turbedmatrix andcheckfor theperturbation,otherwisethealternativeway usingtheFouriersumasafilter tool shouldbeinvestigated.
4.4.2 CompleteGraph
The spectralbehavior of a non-directionalcompletegraphas in Fig.( 4.8) andrepresentedby matrix Ô F 5 in Eq.(4.26)andits correspondingHermitianmatrixÔ L ]V�F 5 @ 'GF 5 in Eq.( 4.27) is characterizedby the fact that only oneeigenvalue ��%��m� � �|� @¨- � f exists, while all otherswill be of the sameabsolutevalue� �J� � f � + R@ - . Sincethe sumof all eigenvalueshasto be . asexplainedinsection 3.3.4they alsohave theoppositesignof thestrongesteigenvalue. In ad-dition all eigenvectorcomponentsof thefirst eigenvectorwill haveequalabsolutevalue.This holdsalsowhenusingcomplex Hermitianmatrices(seeeigensystemin Tab.( 4.13).
1
2 3
4
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Figure4.8: Completesymmetricbidirectionalgraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.26)
Ô F 5 @ �QQ . - � -`G - � -<GA- � -<G- � -<G . - � -<GA- � -<G- � -<GA- � -`G . - � -<G- � -<GA- � -`G - � -<G . �RR� (4.26)
Ô L ]V�F 5 @ 'KF 5 @ �QQ . -�¦D4:- ->¦D4¤- -�¦S4¤--�¦S4¤- . ->¦D4¤- -�¦S4¤--�¦S4¤- -�¦D4:- . -�¦S4¤--�¦S4¤- -�¦D4:- ->¦D4¤- . RR� (4.27)
62 CHAPTER4
k� � ��tw �
,�@C- ,�@8E ,�@6) ,@241 1. 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.52 -0.33 -0.09 -0.53 -0.20 0.823 -0.33 0.04 -0.54 0.79 -0.294 -0.33 0.87 -0.29 -0.29 -0.29
Table4.13:Eigensystemof'GF 5 in Eq.(4.27)
Thiseigensystemfor all eigenvaluesandtheeigenvectorcorrespondingto thelargesteigenvaluecorrespondto Cvetkovic et al. [CS97, p.235].
Now consideran asymmetriccompletegraphasin Fig.( 4.9). The complexadjacency matrix is givenin Eq.(4.28)andtherotatedHermitianmatrix Ô L ]V�F 5 ð @'KF 5 ð in Eq.(4.29).
1
2 3
4
1 2
4
2
3
3
0
0 5
5
1
1
Figure4.9: Completedirectionalcomplex graph
Ô F 5 ð @ �QQ . E � )>G ) B�G) � E�G . E � -<G©4 � B�G)>G - � E�G . - � -<GB B � 4�GA- � -<G . �RR� (4.28)
Ô L ]V�F 5 ð @ 'GF 5 ð @ �QQ . ):¦eB � .:¦�7�G E5¦æ-Xk E³¦{-<G ):¦�B � ):¦�B´G):¦�BSkÏ.³¦87�G . E³¦æ-Zk~.³¦87�G3Gzs:¦�) � .:¦87´GE5¦æ- � E5¦æ-<G¯E³¦{- � .:¦�7�G . -�¦S4):¦�BSk�)³¦�B�Gzs:¦D)�k~.:¦�7�G ->¦D4 . �RR� (4.29)
Theeigensystemof this graphis givenin Tabs.(4.14)and( 4.15)Again the effect of bidirectionalasymmetriccommunicationis visible. The
eigenvaluesloosetheir strict behavior asdo theeigenvectors.As a conclusionit canbestatedthata completestructurecanbe identifiedif
theeigensystemhasthefollowing characteristics:
CHAPTER4 63
k� � ��tw �
,�@¾- ,�@ÄE ,�@T) ,�@241 1.0 0.44+0.26i 0.55+0.12i 0.21+0.19i 0.582 -0.67 -0.12-0.39i -0.53+0.05i -0.06+0.19i 0.723 -0.37 0.64 -0.36+0.47i -0.04-0.48i -0.06-0.08i4 0.05 -0.06-0.40i 0.04+0.22i 0.80 -0.15+0.34i
Table4.14:Eigensystemof matrix'GF 5 ð in Eq.(4.29)� � � f � ± � = � 5
1.0 -0.67 -0.37 0.05� · �  0W·�4 � · �  03·�4 � · �  03·�4 � · �  0W·�4��tw f 0.51 0.53 0.41 -1.9 0.64 0 0.40 -1.7��tw ± 0.56 0.21 0.53 3.1 0.59 2.2 0.23 1.4��tw = 0.29 0.75 0.20 1.9 0.48 -1.7 0.80 0��tw 5 0.58 0 0.72 0 0.1 -2.3 0.37 2.0
Table4.15:Eigensystemfor' Ovx Ý
in Eq.(4.16)with ·¿@ � · � � ^º¹"��| �* Thereis only oneeigenvalueof relative high absolutevalue,while all oth-
ershave the sameor almostthe sameabsolutevalueandaresmallerthanthe largesteigenvalue:
Ø � � �$ð�ñ �eÿ�ÿ�� � �~� Ö + R@ ��% and � � ��ðñ � @o b�$ð�ñ�ªd¤��« ��dgf � � �U�* Theeigenvectorcorrespondingto thelargesteigenvalueshowsadistributionof absolutevaluesof eigenvectorcomponentsthat is equallydistributedorcloseto that. All membersareof relative equalimportance,which is intu-itive.
4.4.3 Two subgroupsconnectedby onelink
An interestingexamplethatgivesmoreinsightinto theinterpretationof thesignoftheeigenvaluescanbeconstructedasfollows. Considera network with two sub-groupssuchthattheonesubgroupis astarstructurewhile theotheris acompletegraph.Thesetwo subgroupssharea link. (seeFig.( 4.10)).Thematrix ¬ for this graphis givenin Eq.( 4.30). Thestructureof thetwo sub-groupsis evidentin thematrix ¬ . Theeigensystemof therotatedmatrix is givenin Tab.( 4.16). The fact that the secondandthird eigenvaluesharethe samean-chorpointsto thefact thata secondinterpretablecharacteristiccanbeseen.Theeigenvectorsgive this interpretation. The subspacecorrespondingto the nega-tive eigenvalue
� ± @ k .:¦Ds^[ givesthepatternfor theconnectionsin thecomplete
64 CHAPTER4
6
8 7
9
1
5 3
42
Figure4.10:A network consistingof two subgroupsandsymmetricbilateralcom-munication
group,while the subspacecorrespondingto the positive eigenvalue� = @ .:¦Ds+4
showsthatthetwo subgroupsbreakapartif vertex s is removed.
¬¢@�QQQQQQQQQQQQ
. - � -<GA- � -`G - � -<GA- � -<G . . . .- � -<G . . . . . . . .- � -<G . . . . . . . .- � -<G . . . . . . . .- � -<G . . . . - � -<G . . .. . . . - � -<G . - � -<GA- � -`G - � -<G. . . . . - � -<G . - � -`G - � -<G. . . . . - � -<GA- � -<G . - � -<G. . . . . - � -<GA- � -<GA- � -`G .
�RRRRRRRRRRRR�(4.30)
This behavior alsoholdsfor arbitrarymatricesof this kind. This follows theobservationsof Barnettet al. [BR85].
4.5 Conclusion
It canthusbeseenfrom theseexamples,that theeigensystemof a complex Her-mitian adjacency matrix holdsall the information,that therealadjacency matrix
CHAPTER4 65
k� � �tw �
,�@Y- ,�@�E ,@T) ,�@4 ,@�B ,�@6s ,�@®7 ,�@6[ ,@ÄD1 1 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.52 0.47 0.47 0.472 -0.68 0.64 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.45 0.32 -0.08 -0.08 -0.083 0.64 0.69 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0 -0.12 -0.12 -0.124 -0.43 -0.32 0.24 0.24 0.24 -0.3 0.71 -0.21 -0.21 -0.215 -0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.76 -0.12 -0.646 -0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.34 0.81 -0.487 0.11 -0.09 -0.26 -0.26 -0.26 0.74 0.34 -0.21 -0.21 -0.218 0 0 0.72 -0.04 -0.69 0 0 0 0 09 0 0 -0.51 0.81 -0.29 0 0 0 0 0
Table4.16:Eigensystemof therotatedmatrix ¬ in Eq.(4.30)
carriedandin additiondoesalsoprovide informationof thedirectionof commu-nication.Informationsthatcanbegainedfrom this analysisare:
* The patternstructureof bidirectionalasymmetriccommunication,whichcanberepresentedasaFouriersum.
* Structuralsimilarity thatis representedin theprojectorsasin realadjacencymatricesanddirectionalsimilarity from thephaseinformationavailableincomplex numbers.
* Patternhomogeneitythat is expressedin theeigenvectorscorrespondingtopositiveandnegativeeigenvalues.
* Perturbationtheorycanbeusedto explaineigensystembehavior.
The methodof eigensystemanalysisof complex Hermitianadjacency matri-cescanthusbroadenthesetof informationthatcanbegained.Thefact that thisanalysisis performedin Hilbert spaceis a moregeneralapproachthenthe onesavailableat themoment.Theuseof complex numbersallow for theuseof bidi-rectionaldatawithout informationloss.
Chapter 5
Data sets
In this chapterthedatasetsusedin this work will beshortlydescribedandtheircharacteristicswill beintroduced.Two well known datasetswill beused.
1. TheEIESfull datasetasdescribedin Freeman[FF79]
2. TheEIESsubsetasdescribedin Freeman[Fre97]
Thesedatasetsarebeingused,sothatthedifferencesandsimilaritiesbetweenthemethodproposedin chapter 4 andthestandardmethodsbecomeclearlyvis-ible. The completeEIES dataset is usedto show how communicationpatternsaredetected,the subsetis usedto show how the methodyields resultsthat aredifferentfrom thosereturnedby thestandardmethodsbut not implausible.
5.1 EIES data set
This dataset is basedon researchdoneby L. andS. Freemanin the late 1970s[FF79]. It is thoroughlydiscussedin [WF94]. It describesthe communicationbehavior of a set of researcherswho usedan electronicinformation exchangesystem(EIES).This researchfocusedon theway CMC influencedthecommuni-cationbehavior within a groupof researcherswho aregeographicallyapartandsharethesameinterestinto anewly developingresearchfield.
This datasetgivesthe opportunityto seethat differentcommunicationpat-ternsexist in onegroupwith respectto direction,even if the groupis not huge.Tab.( 5.1) representsthe weightedadjacency matrix. In this dataset messagesfrom onememberto oneothermemberaswell asfrom onememberto all othermembershavebeenincluded[Fre04]. For thepurposesof thisbooktheentriesonthediagonalweresetto y ��� @Ä. .
67
68 CHAPTER5
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
10
48828
6520
6545
34682
52177
2824
4981
7777
7333
3122
4631
12838
8995
25388
71212
1852
3640
1717
150
3020
3520
2215
1515
1550
258
015
1515
150
1515
1024
8923
16339
34
50
00
00
50
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
04
5230
00
02
032
2134
90
00
05
42
350
00
012
00
125
204
1933
526
44
40
48
44
44
44
44
44
44
04
84
144
04
04
74
46
7223
02
00
016
07
150
00
87
60
00
00
014
00
73
343
220
714
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
06
08
23982
537
334
50
1218
16418
00
030
5327
204
05
455
09
340
146216
88288
924
250
20
00
80
015
010
00
05
00
00
00
00
015
010
030
4410
4315
032
012
014
00
252
00
010
100
2015
05
2029
04
100
476
2219
11178
360
110
1910
17239
280
04
00
2315
240
08
00
2910
1122
046
0119
3412
05
00
00
05
00
00
00
00
00
50
00
00
00
00
530
59
135
00
00
00
00
05
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
05
014
120
90
00
00
00
00
00
012
00
50
00
00
00
00
350
80
15120
00
00
40
00
00
50
00
00
00
00
00
00
08
058
032
016
5825
010
00
020
05
100
05
00
100
00
50
05
00
00
350
100
1763
189
70
60
360
59
50
50
50
00
52
00
00
015
010
915
918
588
54
00
04
05
180
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
200
810
480
195
50
250
00
100
00
00
50
00
00
00
05
00
00
00
010
020
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
40
00
00
00
40
00
219
00
00
00
00
03
00
00
50
00
00
00
00
00
05
00
022
100
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
040
00
00
150
05
235
55
00
00
00
190
00
00
00
05
00
00
00
00
014
05
024
8917
414
1418
841
419
314
49
414
49
44
458
40
1814
94
1564
5610
2532
50
00
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
100
230
00
00
915
026
355
00
00
00
05
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
100
130
2750
280
130
00
1929
58
033
04
010
150
00
00
100
00
332
013
3328
96
00
03
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
06
29559
1325
2421
290
15515
9869
8937
7680
6315
49
1843
10829
2180
1566
00
1491
12630
3921
06
33
0140
07
02
00
00
95
00
00
00
00
20
180
208
3182
12510
2210
1518
7035
23114
2016
1524
3028
4930
55
158
5325
821
865
280
6732
23999
027
30
0268
10118
354
00
00
70
00
014
05
00
506
717
1070
Table5.1:F
ullEIE
Sdataset
CHAPTER5 69
Theplotsof in- andout-degreeasdefinedin section3.2.1canbeseenin Fig.(5.1)and Fig.( 5.3). The correspondingplots of strengthas given in section 3.2.1is shown in Fig.( 5.2) andFig.( 5.4). Thesefiguresshow that while the degreedistributiondoesnotdropdramaticallyafterthehighestdegreevalue,thestrengthdropssharply. This canbeexplainedby thefact thatthememberwith ID - , whoactuallyis Linton Freeman,wasthesystemadministratorin thisexperiment.Thushehadto write many messagesto all othermembers[Fre04].
1 5 10 15 20 25 30k
10
15
20
25
dki
Figure5.1: EIES:In-degreesortedby amount
1 5 10 15 20 25 30k
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
ski
Figure5.2: EIES:Inboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount
70 CHAPTER5
1 5 10 15 20 25 30k
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
dko
Figure5.3: EIES:Out-degreesortedby amount
1 5 10 15 20 25 30k
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
sko
Figure5.4: EIES:Outboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount
CHAPTER5 71
Thestandardindicesfor this datasetare:
* Numberof authors:)�E* Numberof messages:-"B>.^)�4* Inboundstrengthdistribution : As canbeseenin Fig.( 5.2)oneauthor(ID
1) clearly hasthe highestinboundstrengthasdefinedin Eq.( 3.10). Mostof theothermembershave a strengthof below B>.�. . Only 7 authorshave astrengthin therangeof B>.�. to -"B>.>. .* Outboundstrengthdistribution: As canbeseenin Fig.( 5.4)theauthorwith
ID 1 againclearlystandsapart. Most of theothermembershave a degreeof below B>.�. . 5 authorshave a strengthin therangeof B>.�. to -"E>.�. . and2authorsarein therangeof -"B>.>. to E�B>.�. .* Outboundstrength/inboundstrength:Tab.( 5.2)givestheoutboundstrength
andinboundstrengthindicesnormalizedwith thetotalamountof messages.
* Centrality: Following Eq.( 3.2) is given in Fig.( 5.3). In Tab.( 5.2) this isalsogivenin comparisonto thestrength.
* Prestige:Following Eq.(3.9) is givenin Fig.( 5.1). In Tab.( 5.2) this is alsogivenin comparisonto thestrength.
* Eigenvectorcentralitycalculatedasin Freeman[FF79]seeTabs.(7.6),( 7.7),( 7.8) and( 7.9) in theappendix:As canbeseen,theeigenvaluescomeinpairs,thusthetwo correspondingeigenspacesareusedto evaluatethehier-archicalstructure.
72 CHAPTER5
AuthorID Outboundstrength Inboundstrength Centrality Prestige1 0.21 0.17 0.032 0.0302 0.075 0.081 0.029 0.0253 0.00093 0.0067 0.003 0.0114 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.0195 0.010 0.0059 0.029 0.0086 0.016 0.014 0.016 0.0137 0.0013 0.0082 0.001 0.0078 0.11 0.092 0.026 0.0219 0.013 0.025 0.011 0.01110 0.024 0.025 0.021 0.01911 0.056 0.049 0.021 0.01912 0.0055 0.013 0.006 0.01213 0.00100 0.0098 0.003 0.00914 0.0054 0.013 0.006 0.01015 0.015 0.015 0.006 0.00816 0.013 0.022 0.012 0.01517 0.015 0.019 0.018 0.01718 0.013 0.015 0.011 0.01119 0.0043 0.011 0.007 0.01120 0.00053 0.0065 0.002 0.00821 0.0015 0.0074 0.004 0.01022 0.0047 0.019 0.004 0.01023 0.0039 0.0080 0.007 0.00924 0.043 0.042 0.032 0.01325 0.0073 0.0073 0.007 0.00626 0.0045 0.011 0.005 0.00827 0.020 0.027 0.017 0.01828 0.0016 0.0052 0.004 0.00829 0.15 0.091 0.029 0.02630 0.019 0.027 0.014 0.01431 0.069 0.076 0.032 0.02732 0.071 0.061 0.018 0.018
Table5.2: Outbound,inboundstrength,centralityandprestigeof theEIEScom-pletedataset
CHAPTER5 73
5.2 Subsetof EIES data set
The EIES subsetis a seven membersubsetof the total EIES dataset(Tab. 5.3,[Fre97]). Thesesevenmembersarethemostprominentin thegroup.Theentriesnow representthe numberof messagesthatwent from onememberto the othermember [Fre04]. This subset,sinceit is smallerandthusmoreopento intuitiveinvestigation,is usedto giveacomparisonbetweenthecalculationdoneby Free-manandtheresultsobtainedwith themethodproposedin chapter4 [HGS04].
Author ID Freeman White Alba Bernard Doreian Mullins Wellman1 2 4 8 11 24 29
Freeman 1 0 115 17 93 53 33 84White 2 84 0 4 5 5 0 15Alba 4 16 10 0 15 3 3 4
Bernard 8 127 22 17 0 57 12 34Doreian 11 57 9 4 57 0 8 10Mullins 24 23 4 3 9 8 0 33Wellman 29 118 24 5 35 15 45 0
Table5.3: Numberof messagesexchangedbetweenmembersin theEIESsubset
Thestandardindicesfor this datasetare:
* Numberof authors:7* Numberof messages:-"E>D�B* Outboundandinboundstrength,centralityandprestige:SeeTab.( 5.4).
* Themostcentralandprestigiousmemberis Freeman,followedby Bernard(seeTab.( 5.4)).
* Eigenvectorcentrality:Calculatedwith thedichotomizationandsubsequentsymmetrizationseeTab.( 5.5). Themostcentralmemberdueto theeigen-systemis Wellman.This is only understandablewhenthepreprocessingistakeninto account.
In Fig.( 5.5) thein-degreeis givenby authorID. It canbeseenthat thegraphis almostcompletelyconnected.This is supportedby theout-degreedistributionin Fig.( 5.7).
74 CHAPTER5
1 4 2 7 2 6 3k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
dki
Figure5.5: EIESsubset:In-degree;k: authorID
1 4 2 7 5 6 3k
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
ski
Figure5.6: EIESsubset:Inboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount;k: au-thor ID
CHAPTER5 75
Thestrengthof inboundandoutboundtraffic in thesubsetis givenin Fig.(5.6)andFig.( 5.8).Clearlynow theauthorwith ID 1 (Freeman)is themostactiveandauthorwith ID 4 (Bernard)comessecond,but verycloseto all others.
76 CHAPTER5
1 4 7 5 2 6 3k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
dko
Figure5.7: EIESsubset:Out-degreesortedby amount
1 4 7 5 2 6 3k
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
sko
Figure5.8: EIESsubset:Outboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount
CHAPTER5 77
Author IDOutbound Inbound
Centrality Prestigestrength strength
Freeman 1 0.31 0.33 0.24 0.24White 2 0.087 0.14 0.20 0.24Alba 4 0.039 0.039 0.24 0.24
Bernard 8 0.21 0.17 0.24 0.24Doreian 11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.24Mullins 24 0.062 0.078 0.24 0.20Wellman 29 0.19 0.14 0.24 0.24
Table5.4: Outboundandinboundstrengthfor theEIESsubsetnormalizedby thetotal numberof messages,aswell ascentralityandprestige
Thesetwo datasetswill be analyzedwith the proposedmethodin chapter6, and the resultsobtainedwill be comparedwith the standardresultsand aninterpretationwill begiven.
Author/Eigenvalue 1.0 0.13 0.071 0.071 0.011 0 0Freeman 0.40 0.25 0.20 0.61 0.47 0 0White 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0Alba 0.16 0.48 -0.47 -0.38 -0.15 0.71 0
Bernard 0.51 0.064 0.47 0.38 -0.71 0 0Doreian 0.40 0.25 0.27 -0.22 0.47 0 0Mullins 0.16 0.48 -0.47 -0.38 -0.15 -0.71 0Wellman 0.60 -0.65 -0.47 -0.38 0.061 0 0
Table5.5: Eigensystemof theEIESsubsetascalculatedwith themethodusedbyFreeman
Chapter 6
Resultsand Discussion
Thischapterwill presentresultsobtainedwith theproposedmethod.To show thedifferencesbetweenthestandardmethodsandtheproposedmethodtheverywelldescribedEIESdatasetof Freeman(seesection 5.1) andthesubsetof thatdatasetdescribedin section 5.2will beused.
For eachdatasetthefollowing resultswill bepresentedanddiscussed:* Eigensystem
– Full dataset: 7.2Tabs.(7.2),(7.3),( 7.4)and( 7.5)
– Subset:seesection6.2.1* Eigenvaluedistribution
– Full dataset:seeFig.( 6.2)
– Subset:seeFig.( 6.29)* Cumulativevariancecoveredby eigenvalues
– Full dataset:seeFig.( 6.3)
– Subset:seeFig.( 6.30)* Distributionof theabsolutevalueandphaseof eigenvectorcomponents
– Full dataset:seeFigs.(6.4)-(6.14)andFigs.(6.5)-(6.15)
– Subset:seeFigs.(6.31)-(6.33)andFigs.(6.32)-(6.34)* Eigenprojectordensityplotsfor relevantsubspaces(realandimaginarypartseparately)
– Full dataset:Figs.(6.16)-(6.26)andFigs.(6.17)-(6.27)
– Subset:Figs.(6.35)-(6.37)andFigs.(6.36)-(6.38)
79
80 CHAPTER6
6.1 EIES Data Set
6.1.1 Eigensystemof the EIES Data Set
Theeigensystemof thecompleteEIESdataset(seeTab.( 5.1))obtainedwith themethoddescribedin chapter4 is givenin theappendixin Tabs.(7.2),(7.3),( 7.4)and( 7.5). Fig.(6.1)showstheeigenspectrumwhensortedby value.For aclearerview of a possiblesymmetryFig.( 6.2)shows thedistribution of theeigenvalues,wherethe positive eigenvalueswith index H and the negative eigenvalueswithindex aregiven.It suggeststhebrokensymmetryof astargraphasdiscussedinchapter3.
5 10 15 20 25 30j
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
PSfragreplacements
� «
Figure6.1: Eigenspectrumof thecompleteEIESdatasetsortedby value
In addition the first and thus largesteigenvalue covers already s^sqp of thevarianceof the data(seeTab.( 6.1)). Togetherwith the secondeigenvaluetheyexplain [^sqp of the variance. The first six eigenvaluescover about D+[qp . For aclearerrepresentationof thecumulativevarianceseeFig.( 6.3).
Thus, to understandthe patternstructurewith the most messagevolume itwould be sufficient to look at the first two eigenspaces.For a broaderview thefirst six eigenspacesaregivenandinterpretedhere.If moredetailis necessary, theothersubspacescanbetakeninto account.
As thedistributionof theeigenvectorcomponentsgivesahint aboutthestruc-turewithin thepattern,first thedistribution of theabsolutevalueof componentsof theeigenvectorscanbeseenin Figs.(6.4),( 6.6),( 6.8),( 6.12),( 6.10),( 6.14)with their respective phasedistribution in Figs.(6.5),(6.7), (6.9), (6.13), (6.11),(6.15). The % -axis is denotedby , which is the runningindex within the eigen-vector. This index is not equivalentto theauthorID, sincethevalueshave been
CHAPTER6 81
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
PSfragreplacements
� F« � � 9¯j,f
Figure6.2: Eigenspectrumof thecompleteEIESdatasetsortedby absolutevalue
5 10 15 20 25 30 35k
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
� ±° w �
Figure6.3: Cumulativecoveredvarianceby eigenvalues� �
82 CHAPTER6
+ Coveredvarianceper� � Cumulativecoveredvariance
1 0.66 0.662 0.20 0.863 0.06 0.924 0.03 0.965 0.02 0.986 0.01 0.98
7-10 � .³¦e.:- 0.9911-32 78. 1.0
Table6.1: Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tabs.(7.2)-(7.5)
sortedby eitherabsolutevalueor amount.
First suspaceof EIES data set
Let usstartwith analyzingthe subspacecorrespondingto� f in moredetail. As
canbeseenin Fig.(6.4)thedistributionstartsof ratherlow andalreadythesecondlargestcomponentonly hasan absolutevalueof about .:¦D4 . From +Q@¯-n.Z¦<¦<¦ªE�Eandagainfor the rest thereis almostan equaldistribution visible. This pointstowardsa connectedgraph. Thephasedistribution, asgiven in Fig.( 6.5), variesbetween. and
: 5 , whichsuggests,thatthecommunicationis mostlybalanced.
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²�³(´�±
Figure6.4: Absolutevaluedistribution for theeigenvectorcorrespondingto µ ³As a representationof theprojectorsfollowing Eq.( 3.66)therealpartof the
projectors,thepatternsimilarity of eigenvectorcomponentsof eacheigenvector,andtheimaginarypart,theabsolutevalueof thecrossproductof theeigenvector
CHAPTER6 83
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²�³(´º¹
Figure6.5: Phasedistributionof theeigenvectorcomponentscorrespondingto µ ³componentscanbevisualizedin densityplots,wherethegray level indicatestherelative absolutevalue. The densityplot givesthe completematrix of the real,respectively the imaginarypartof theprojector. Thenumbersat thebottomandat the left handsideof theplot indicatetheauthorasin theoriginal matrix. Thisrepresentationis now the link backto theoriginal complex Hermitianadjacencymatrix, andthusby back-rotationto theoriginal complex adjacency matrix. Thematrix is symmetricfor therealpartandskew-symmetricfor theimaginarypart.
Fig.( 6.16)shows, that theauthorswith ID »½¼�¾M¼�¿^¿^¼À»+ÁM¼ÀÂM¿ and Âq» have a highpatternsimilarity to authorwith ID ¿ , who is the anchorin this patternascanbeverifiedby checkingagainstthecompleteeigensystem,andalsoamongsteachother. This is representedby thebrightsquareswhich lie in thebottomrow. Sincethis plot is symmetric,this also holds for the first column. A high brightnessstandsfor a high similarity. Fig.( 6.17)in additionshows, thatauthorwith ID »�Áhasa high (first row) skewnesscomparedto authorwith ID ¿ , which meanshecould be viewed aswriting moremails to authorwith ID 1, thenhe getsback.Whereasauthorswith IDs » and ÂM¿ have a low skewness,andarethusmorein-boundoriented.Sincethis plot is skew-symmetric,a bright squarein onehalf ofthematrix correspondsto a darksquarein theother.
Theprojector ÃÅÄ�Æ of this first subspaceweightedby thecorrespondingeigen-valueandrotatedbackwardsby Ç�È�É Ê is partly given in Tabs.(6.3)and( 6.4). Forreasonof betterclarity only the ten highestranked membersin that eigenvectorhavebeentaken.Theindiceson topandon theleft handsidegive theauthorID.
If thisresultis now comparedto asubmatrixof thecomplex adjacency matrix,whichhasbeenextractedfrom thecomplex adjacency matrixby usingtheauthorsbasedon thestatusindex within thesubspace,this givesa clearerview what the
84 CHAPTER6
subpatternis. Thesubmatrixbasedon theeigenvectorcentralitygivenin thefirsteigenvector is given in Tab.( 6.5). As canbe seen,the membersareconnectedandthe subgraphis complete.This hasalreadybeensuggestedby theprojectorandthedistribution of theabsolutevaluesof theeigenvector. Also thedirectioninformationgiven by the projectorcanbe found in this submatrix. The authorwith ID 1 hasmoreinboundthanoutboundtraffic, while authorswith IDs 29 and8 aremoreoutboundthaninboundoriented.
Secondsubspaceof EIES data set
Thesecondsubspacealreadyservesasa correctionfor thefirst (Fouriersum),inthatit almostcancelsthediagonalentries,whichwerepresentin thefirst projector,andat the sametime shows the secondstrongestpattern(variancecoverageofabout»+ËqÌ ) andin thiscasealsodescribesthebehavior of thesubgroupconsistingof the strongestmembersin this pattern. Comparedto the first subspace,givenin Fig.( 6.4), Fig.( 6.6) shows, that thehighestvaluedcomponentranksat aboutËMÍ8Î andthenext followsonly afteragapof about ËMÍ�» . Againafteradropof aboutËMÍ8» onemoreauthorsstandsout, while the restthendropsbelow ËMÍÏ¿ andout ofrelevance.Thissuggestsastarpatternwith about majorcentersandaminoroneof stars, ÐrÑ¡¿ÒÍ�Í�ÍXÓ . The phasedistribution in Fig.( 6.7) shows, that the phaserangesfrom Ô{ÕKÍ�Í�Í�Õ , which is partly due to correctionsfor the first subspace.This is probablythecasefor
¶ ÖØ× Õ .
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²ÚÙ>´�±
Figure6.6: Distributionof± Û�Ù>´>±
The real part of the projectorgiven in Fig.( 6.18) suggests,that the authorswith IDs » and »+Á againhave the strongeststructuresimilarity comparedwiththe anchor, who is the authorwith ID ¿ . The patternin questionis a star like
CHAPTER6 85
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²ÚÙ>´º¹
Figure6.7: Distributionof¶Å· Û�Ù>´Ï¹
behavior. Fig.( 6.19)shows, thattheauthorwith ID ¾ hasa low skewness,whichcorrespondsto ahigheroutboundbehavior towardsauthor ¿ .
Again thebackrotatedweightedprojector ÃÅÄ Ü is givenpartly for thesecondsubspacein Tabs.(6.6) and ( 6.7). As can be seen,this projectorcorrectsthediagonalentriesof ÃtÄ�Æ almostcompletely. In additionit strengthensthepositionof theanchor(authorwith ID ¿ ) andtheauthorwith ID »+Á .
Thesubmatrixcomposedalongthesecondeigenvectoris givenin Tab.( 6.8).This matrix supportsthe interpretationgiven alreadyfor the correspondingpro-jector ÃtÄ�Ü . A starpatternis clearlyvisible. Thestrongeststaris aroundtheauthorwith ID ¿ . Theauthorwith ID »+Á is alsothecenterof astrongstar.
The first two subspacesthusgive informationaboutthe fact, that while therelevant membersarestronglyconnectedamongstthemselvesand looselycon-nectedwith the restof the group,therearedistinct starlike patternsfor eachoftherelevantmemberswith theauthorwith ID ¿ asthestrongestof them.
Third subspaceof EIES data set
Thedistributionof theabsolutevaluesof thethird eigenvectorisgivenin Fig.(6.8).Theanchorhaschanged,which pointstowardthefact,thata differentgroupandpatternis described.This time, the authorwith ID ¾ is the anchor. In additionastheanchorof thefifth eigenvectorsuggestsin Tab.(7.2) , thereis a starpatternagaincenteredon the authorwith ID ¾ . The distribution supportstheview, thatwhile thereare4 relevantmembers,therestareequallylessrelevant. Thephasedistribution in Fig.( 6.9)suggests,thatthereis symmetry, which pointstowardsaÝ,Þ�ß�àvá�Þ0âäã®àváÚå�ß�àváÚÞ�â
patternwith astarpattern,asin subspaces¿ and  .
86 CHAPTER6
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²Úæ>´�±
Figure6.8: Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the3rdeigenvector
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²Úæ>´ç¹
Figure6.9: Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the3rdeigenvector
CHAPTER6 87
Therealpartof theprojectorgivenin Fig.( 6.20)showsthehighpatternsimi-larity betweentheauthorwith ID ¾ andtheauthorswith IDs ¿^¿^¼�Â^Ë and Âq» . WhileFig.( 6.21)showsamoreoutboundcommunicationfor theauthorswith IDs » and»�Á comparedto theauthorwith ID ¾ anda moreinboundcommunicationfor theauthorwith ID Â^Ë and ¿ comparedto theauthorwith ID ¾ .
The submatrixdeducedfrom the third eigenvector is given in Tab.( 6.9). Itconfirms, that there is a strongly connectedgroup aroundthe anchorwith theauthorwith ID ¾ . For acomparisonseetheprojectorÃÅÄ�è givenin Tabs.(6.10)and( 6.11).
Fifth subspaceof the EIES data set
Thefifth eigenvectoragainhasa similar behavior asthesecond,suggesting,thatthis patternis thecompletepatterncorrespondingto thestarpatternfoundin thethird subspace.Thedistribution is givenin Fig.( 6.10). Thephasedistribution inFig.(6.11)supportsthatview, in thatit is similar to theoneof thefirst eigenvector,if onetakesinto account,thata phasebetweenËêé ¶ éìëí hasa similar interpre-tationasaphasebetweenÔ æí\Õîé ¶ éïÔ{Õ . In thiscasethestarpatternof thethirdeigenspaceis strongerthen the completegraphpatternof the fifth eigenspace,which is reflectedin the absolutevalueof the respective eigenvalues. The fact,that therelies anothereigenvalueandthusanotherpatternbetweenthe two canbeexplainedby theinterlacingeffect of eigenvalueswhich occursif perturbationtakesplace.
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²Úð>´>±
Figure6.10:Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the5th eigenvector
Theprojectorin Fig.( 6.22)shows thestructuralsimilarity within thepattern.Clearly, the authorswith IDs Â^ËM¼ÀÂ^»½¼ÀÁ and ¿^¿ have a high structuralsimilarity
88 CHAPTER6
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²Úð>´ç¹
Figure6.11:Phasedistribution for the5theigenvector
with author ¾ . Fig.( 6.23)reveals,thatauthorsÂ^ËM¼�Á and » have a low skewness,translatinginto aninboundpatterncomparedto author¾ , while authors¿�Ó�¼À»^» and»�Ó aremoreoutboundin comparison.
The fact, that therearetwo disturbedstarpatternsaroundtheauthorwith ID¿ andthe authorwith ID ¾ , combinedwith the result that the authorwith ID ¾alsoplaysa relevantrole in thegroupof theauthorwith ID ¿ suggests,thatthesetwo starpatternsarecloselyconnected.While the first group is morestronglyconnectedwith everybodyelse,while still keepingastarpattern,thesecondgrouparoundthe authorwith ID ¾ hasa strongerfocuson the starpatternthanon thecompletepatternwhich might allow theconclusionthat thegroupof theanchorwith ID ¿ is more“open to the public”, while thegrouparoundtheanchorwithID ¾ is moreclosed.
Fourth subspaceof the EIES data set
Thedistribution in thefourth eigenvectoris givenin Fig.( 6.12). Now theauthorwith ID »+Á is theanchor. Theotherrelevantmembersarethosewith IDs » and »�Ó .It is probable,thatagainthis is anew subpatternandalsoanew group.Thephasedistribution in Fig.( 6.13)againsuggestsastronglyconnectedpattern.
Thedensityplotssupporttheabove interpretation.Fig.( 6.24)shows, thattheauthorswith IDs »½¼�»�Ó and ÂM¿ seemto behighly patterncorrelatedwith theauthorwith ID »+Á . In additionFig.(6.25)shows,thatwhile theauthorswith IDs » and »�Óhaveamoreinboundbehavior, theauthorwith ID ÂM¿ hasamoreoutboundpattern.
CHAPTER6 89
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ² í ´>±
Figure6.12:Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the4th eigenvector
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ² í ´º¹
Figure6.13:Phasedistribution for the4theigenvector
90 CHAPTER6
Sixth subspaceof the EIES data set
Fig.( 6.14)givesthedistributionof theabsolutevaluesof theeigenvectorcompo-nentsof thesixtheigenvector, while Fig.(6.15)againshowsthephasedistribution.Theanchorof thatsubspaceis theauthorwith ID » .Theauthorwith ID »�Ó is alsoclose,but overall the relevanceof both authorsis alreadynot very high with acentralityindex of approximatelyËMÍSÓ .
1 5 10 15 20 25 30l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²Úñ>´�±
Figure6.14:Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the6theigenvector
5 10 15 20 25 30l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²Úñ>´ç¹
Figure6.15:Phasedistribution for the6theigenvector
Theprojector ÃtÄ ò is againgivenin his realpart in Fig.( 6.26)andin its imag-inary part in Fig.( 6.27). The authorwith ID » shows a relative high visibility.
CHAPTER6 91
As canbe seen,he seemsto be moreinboundoriented,asin Fig.( 6.26)all hisrelevantpartnersshow a low patternsimilarity.
If onenow takesa look at thetwo partialsumsof weightedprojectors,namelyó ³>ô Ù Ñ ·<õ ÙöÀ÷ ³ µ ö à ö ¹ Ç È>ø Ê given in Tabs.(7.10), ( 7.11), ( 7.12) and ( 7.13) intheAppendixand
ó æXô ñ Ñ · õ ñöÀ÷ æ µ ö à ö ¹ Ç�È ø Ê givenin Tabs.(7.14),( 7.15),( 7.16)and( 7.17)intheAppendix,thenit canbeseenthat
ó ³>ô Ùis alreadya very good
approximationof theoriginal matrix whenbackrotated.ó æXô ñ
on theotherhandshows that oncethe main bulk of communicationhasbeenfiltered out, that theauthorwith ID ¾ , which is Bernard,is actuallythecentralmemberof thegroup.
6.1.2 Comparisonwith dichotomizedandsymmetrisizedeigen-system
If theeigensystemof thefull datasetis calculatedwith themethodusedby Free-man(seeTabs.(7.6) -( 7.9) in the Appendix),a comparisongiven in Tab.( 6.2)showsthattheanchorsof thesubpatternsdonotmatch,exceptfor thefirsteigenspace.ù · µ ö ¹ and ú · µ ö ¹ representtheFreemanmethodandtheHermitianmethod.Thenumbersin bracketscorrespondto theeigenvaluessortedby absolutevalue.TheauthorIDs aregivenfrom left to right for eacheigenvector, goingfrom theanchorto the10thrankedmemberin thateigenvector. Theeffect seenis mostprobablyaresultof thedichotomizationandthusof informationloss.ù · µ ³û¹ 1 29 8 2 32 31 11 24 30 27ú · µ ³û¹ 1 31 8 24 5 29 2 11 3 10ù · µ Ù�¹ 1 29 2 8 32 11 15 18 26 31ú · µ Ù�¹ 17 16 12 23 9 22 7 21 20 14ù · µ æ�¹ 8 32 30 11 29 1 2 9 31 17ú · µ æ�¹ 5 2 32 30 27 10 19 17 6 25ù · µ í ¹ 29 24 2 31 15 32 12 11 14 10ú · µ í ¹ 32 2 31 27 4 6 12 24 8 29ù · µ ð�¹ 8 32 30 29 24 22 11 2 15 14ú · µ ð�¹ 24 1 27 18 5 13 2 28 20 8ù · µ ñ�¹ 2 24 31 22 29 30 8 9 18 10ú · µ ñ�¹ 11 27 15 10 5 4 32 6 29 25
Table6.2: Comparisonof anchorsof thefull datasetbetweenthemethodusedbyFreeman( ú · µ ö ¹ ) andthemethodpresentedin this book(
ù · µ ö ¹ )
92 CHAPTER6
129
82
32
1370.81+
370.81i237.94+
306.61i243.33+
225.41i252.20+
177.74i181.19+
186.72i29
306.61+237.94i
203.10+203.10i
199.54+142.99i
201.64+107.16i
150.33+120.33i
8225.41+
243.33i142.99+
199.54i148.35+
148.35i155.11+
118.43i110.01+
122.40i2
177.74+252.20i
107.16+201.64i
118.43+155.11i
128.36+128.36i
86.29+126.44i
32186.72+
181.19i120.33+
150.33i122.40+
110.01i126.44+
86.29i91.28+
91.28i31
114.67+187.96i
66.79+148.63i
77.01+
116.03i85.35+
97.45i55.48+
94.10i11
133.87+142.30i
85.12+116.89i
87.38+
87.38i91.90+
69.06i65.35+
71.60i24
97.75+
117.32i60.91+
95.20i64.62
+71.79i
68.45+58.20i
47.62+58.93i
3050.12+
81.04i29.30+
64.14i33.63
+50.01i
37.19+41.95i
24.26+40.58i
2744.02+
72.56i25.60+
57.35i29.57
+44.80i
32.80+37.64i
21.30+36.32i
Table6.3:Part1:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorbasedcorrespondingtothe
firsteigenvalue31
1124
3027
1187.96+
114.67i142.30+
133.87i117.32+
97.75i81.04+
50.12i72.56
+44.02i
29148.63+
66.79i116.89+
85.12i95.20
+60.91i
64.14+29.30i
57.35+
25.60i8
116.03+77.01i
87.38+
87.38i71.79
+64.62i
50.01+33.63i
44.80+
29.57i2
97.45+85.35i
69.06+
91.90i58.20
+68.45i
41.95+37.19i
37.64+
32.80i32
94.10+55.48i
71.60+
65.35i58.93
+47.62i
40.58+24.26i
36.32+
21.30i31
65.37+65.37i
44.84+
68.69i38.21
+51.48i
28.29+28.29i
25.20+
25.20i11
68.69+44.84i
51.47+
51.47i42.58
+37.74i
29.61+19.59i
26.52+
17.22i24
51.48+38.21i
37.74+
42.58i31.45
+31.45i
22.18+16.67i
19.88+
14.68i30
28.29+28.29i
19.59+
29.61i16.67
+22.18i
12.24+12.24i
10.90+
10.90i27
25.20+25.20i
17.22+
26.52i14.68
+19.88i
10.90+10.90i
9.71+
9.71i
Table6.4:Part2:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorbasedcorrespondingtothe
firsteigenvalue
CHAPTER6 93
129
82
3231
1124
10
388
+55
9i34
6+
239i
488
+36
4i18
5+
239i
212
+82
i17
7+
178i
128
+89
i29
559
+38
8i0
155
+14
6i13
2+
89i
126
+71
i91
+65
i69
+46
i21
8+
156i
823
9+
346i
146
+15
5i0
82+
20i
288
+26
8i88
+70
i16
4+
172i
55+
41i
236
4+
488i
89+
132i
20+
82i
039
+99
i16
3+
125i
22+
36i
17i
3223
9+
185i
71+
126i
268
+28
8i99
+39
i0
107
+67
i35
+34
i5
+10
i31
82+
212i
65+
91i
70+
88i
125
+16
3i67
+10
7i0
114
+11
9i53
+56
i11
178
+17
7i46
+69
i17
2+
164i
36+
22i
34+
35i
119
+11
4i0
29+
31i
2489
+12
8i15
6+
218i
41+
55i
1710
+5i
56+
53i
31+
29i
0
Tabl
e6.
5:S
ubm
atric
esba
sedo
nfir
stei
genv
ecto
r
94 CHAPTER6
129
28
32
1-364.31-
364.31i147.15+
267.28i144.20-
3.31i214.81+
161.81i-15.49
+75.78i
29267.28+
147.15i-127.76-
127.76i-81.48+
25.66i-148.86-
56.62i-3.68
-45.66i
2-3.31
+144.20i
25.66-81.48i
-28.56-28.56i
-8.78-
74.78i18.34-
11.52i8
161.81+214.81i
-56.62-148.86i
-74.78-8.78i
-99.26-99.26i
13.52-38.04i
3275.78-
15.49i-45.66-
3.68i-11.52+
18.34i-38.04+
13.52i-8.21
-8.21i
11-37.79+
12.25i23.52-
0.74i4.83
-10.02i
18.64-9.08i
4.66+
3.72i15
68.53+
31.26i-33.82-
29.08i-19.58
+7.83i
-37.70-11.17i
-1.75-
11.17i18
-26.13+2.65i
15.30+2.80i
4.52-
5.80i13.32-
3.27i2.49
+3.05i
2618.74-
10.80i-12.44+
3.05i-1.44
+5.88i
-8.90+
6.94i-2.90
-1.45i
31-0.76
+20.57i
3.82-
11.57i-4.07
-4.07i
-1.10-
10.69i2.64
-1.61i
Table6.6:Part1:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorcorrespondingtothe
secondeigenvalue11
1518
2631
112.25
-37.79i
31.26+68.53i
2.65-
26.13i-10.80
+18.74i
20.57-
0.76i29
-0.74+
23.52i-29.08
-33.82i
2.80+
15.30i3.05
-12.44i
-11.57+3.82i
2-10.02+
4.83i7.83
-19.58i
-5.80+
4.52i5.88
-1.44i
-4.07-
4.07i8
-9.08+
18.64i-11.17
-37.70i
-3.27+
13.32i6.94
-8.90i
-10.69-1.10i
323.72
+4.66i
-11.17-1.75i
3.05+
2.49i-1.45
-2.90i
-1.61+
2.64i11
-2.17-
2.17i5.80
+0.25i
-1.70-
1.10i0.91
+1.40i
0.67-
1.44i15
0.25+
5.80i-7.79
-7.79i
0.97+
3.71i0.52
-3.12i
-2.78+
1.16i18
-1.10-
1.70i3.71
+0.97i
-0.95-
0.95i0.39
+1.03i
0.63-
0.84i26
1.40+
0.91i-3.12
+0.52i
1.03+
0.39i-0.64
-0.64i
-0.19+
0.84i31
-1.44+
0.67i1.16
-2.78i
-0.84+
0.63i0.84
-0.19i
-0.58-
0.58i
Table6.7:Part2:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorcorrespondingtothe
secondeigenvalue
CHAPTER6 95
129
28
3211
1518
2631
10
388
+55
9i48
8+
364i
346
+23
9i18
5+
239i
177
+17
8i81
+12
0i73
+58
i89
+35
i21
2+
82i
2955
9+
388i
013
2+
89i
155
+14
6i12
6+
71i
69+
46i
80+
58i
4+
8i15
+10
i91
+65
i2
364
+48
8i89
+13
2i0
20+
82i
39+
99i
22+
36i
158
+8i
15+
5i16
3+
125i
823
9+
346i
146
+15
5i82
+20
i0
288
+26
8i16
4+
172i
027
+4i
988
+70
i32
239
+18
5i71
+12
6i99
+39
i26
8+
288i
035
+34
i0
00
107+
67i
1117
8+
177i
46+
69i
36+
22i
172
+16
4i34
+35
i0
024
+18
i11
119+
114i
1512
0+
81i
58+
80i
15i
00
00
00
32+
24i
1858
+73
i8
+4i
8+
8i4
+27
i0
18+
24i
00
048
+49
i26
35+
89i
10+
15i
5+
15i
9i0
11i
00
013
+8i
3182
+21
2i65
+91
i12
5+
163i
70+
88i
67+
107i
114
+11
9i24
+32
i49
+48
i8
+13
i0
Tabl
e6.
8:S
ubm
atric
esba
sedo
nse
cond
eige
nvec
tor
832
3011
291
29
3117
80
288
+26
8i21
6+
140i
164
+17
2i14
6+
155i
239
+34
6i82
+20
i12
+8i
88+
70i
53+
36i
3226
8+
288i
07
+8i
35+
34i
71+
126i
239
+18
5i99
+39
i10
1+
44i
107
+67
i7
+9i
3014
0+
216i
8+
7i0
018
+14
i39
+71
i21
+23
i0
20+
28i
9+
9i11
172
+16
4i34
+35
i0
046
+69
i17
8+
177i
36+
22i
39+
15i
119
+11
4i15
+9i
2915
5+
146i
126
+71
i14
+18
i69
+46
i0
559
+38
8i13
2+
89i
15+
10i
91+
65i
15+
10i
134
6+
239i
185
+23
9i71
+39
i17
7+
178i
388
+55
9i0
488
+36
4i82
+24
i21
2+
82i
77+
63i
220
+82
i39
+99
i23
+21
i22
+36
i89
+13
2i36
4+
488i
035
+25
i16
3+
125i
25+
18i
98
+12
i44
+10
1i0
15+
39i
10+
15i
24+
82i
25+
35i
030
+35
i5
3170
+88
i67
+10
7i28
+20
i11
4+
119i
65+
91i
82+
212i
125
+16
3i35
+30
i0
28+
15i
1736
+53
i9
+7i
9+
9i9
+15
i10
+15
i63
+77
i18
+25
i5i
15+
28i
0
Tabl
e6.
9:S
ubm
atric
esba
sedo
nth
irdei
genv
ecto
r
96 CHAPTER6
832
3011
29
8-5.12
-5.12i
8.84+0.51i
-27.39+31.84i
3.835.73i
20.55-22.69i
320.51
+8.84i
-7.68-7.68i
51.04-6.81i
1.17-8.37i-37.32+
4.01i30
31.84-
27.39-6.81+
51.04i-172.74-172.74i
-34.92+19.73i
122.65+129.07i
115.73
+3.83i
-8.37+
1.17i19.73-34.92i
-4.66-
4.66i-15.02+
25.08i29
-22.69+20.55i
4.01-37.32i129.07+
122.65i25.08
-15.02i
-91.76-91.76i
13.06
-4.30i0.70
+6.43i
-26.28-
15.88i-3.67+
3.46i18.85+
12.06i2
-11.05+13.62i
-0.99-
21.48i83.82+
58.16i12.89
-10.70i
-59.99-43.93i
9-2.74
-0.75i
3.12-1.55i-3.15+
16.21i2.42+
1.21i2.59
-11.75i
31-17.91+
10.15i8.12-23.90i
66.69+99.46i
18.66-6.17i
-46.74-73.71i17
1.31-
0.38i-0.89+
1.41i-2.76
-7.45i-1.30
+0.11i
1.87+5.48i
Table6.10:part1:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorcorrespondingtothe
thirdeigenvalue
12
931
17
8-4.30
+3.06i
13.62-
11.05i-0.75
-2.74i
10.15-17.91i-0.38
+1.31i
326.43
+0.70i
-21.48-
0.99i-1.55
+3.12i
-23.90+8.12i
1.41-0.89i30
-15.88-26.28i58.16+
83.82i16.21-3.15i
99.46+66.69i
-7.45-
2.76i11
3.46-3.67i
-10.70+
12.89i1.21
+2.42i
-6.17+
18.66i0.11-1.30i
2912.06+
18.85i-43.93-
59.99i-11.75+
2.59i-73.71
-46.74i
5.48+1.87i
1-2.73
-2.73i9.62+
8.48i1.88-0.87i
14.14+5.14i
-0.99-
0.11i2
8.48+
9.62i-30.13-
30.13i-6.43
+2.50i
-45.83-20.02i3.27+
0.58i9
-0.87+
1.88i2.50-6.43i
-0.79-
0.79i-0.02
-8.09i0.13+
0.52i31
5.14+14.14i
-20.02-45.83i-8.09
-0.02i
-41.51-
41.51i3.32+
2.03i17
-0.11-
0.99i0.58+
3.27i0.52
+0.13i
2.03+3.32i
-0.18-
0.18i
Table6.11:part2:B
ackrotatedw
eightedprojectorcorrespondingtothe
thirdeigenvalue
CHAPTER6 97
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
524
0
Figure6.16:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
67
-67
Figure6.17:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³
98 CHAPTER6
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
293
-515
Figure6.18:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
104
-104
Figure6.19:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù
CHAPTER6 99
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
178
-244
Figure6.20:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ æ
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
42
-42
Figure6.21:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ æ
100 CHAPTER6
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
69
-47
Figure6.22:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ð
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
15
-15
Figure6.23:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ð
CHAPTER6 101
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
96
-137
Figure6.24:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ í
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
26
-26
Figure6.25:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ í
102 CHAPTER6
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
34
-30
Figure6.26:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ñ
1 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
13
-13
Figure6.27:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ñ
CHAPTER6 103
6.2 Subsetof EIES
The subsetof the EIES datasetTab.(5.3) consistsof seven prominentmembersof the original set. For the purposeof showing the advantagesof the enhancedmethodof eigensystemanalysis,the resultsobtainedby Freemanand reportedin [Fre97] will be used. In this paperFreemanwantedto show a hierarchyofmembersbasedon their eigenvectorcentrality. But to calculatethis eigenvectorcentralityhehadto dichotomizetheadjacency matrix. Thishedid,with theeffect,thatamatrixentrybecameü ö ´ Ñý¿ if thememberÐ wrotemoremailsto memberþthenviceversa,and Ë otherwise.Thenhehadto symmetrizedueto theproblemsdescribedin chapter2. Thisnow ledto theresult,thatWellmanwith ID »+Á becamethetop rankedmember.
As canbeseen,whenthemethodpresentedin thisbookis used,FreemanwithID ¿ himself is themostprominentmember. Freemanhimselfstatedin his paper,thatthedichotomizationledto theeffect,thatthemostgarrulousmemberbecamethemostprominent,which in hiscasewasWellmanwith ID »�Á . With themethodpresentedhere,nodichotomizationis necessaryandtherelevanceof themembersis solelybasedon their communicationbehavior, inboundaswell asoutbound.
Theoriginaladjacency matrixisgivenin Freeman[Fre97, p.11].Thecomplexmatrix ú composedasdescribedin chapter4 thenis givenin Eq.(6.1).As canbeseen,thegraphcorrespondingto this matrix is complete.Still therearepatternsvisible.
úØÑÿ���������Ë ¿^¿���� ¾+Ó Ý ¿vÎ��2¿�� Ý Á^Â�¿v»^Î Ý �+Â��^Î Ý Â^Â�� »�Â Ý ¾+Ó��2¿^¿\¾ ݾ+Ó�2¿^¿�� Ý Ë Ó��¿\Ë Ý ���r»^» Ý ��� Á Ý Ó Ý ¿���� »�Ó Ý¿���2¿vÎ Ý ¿\Ë��rÓ Ý Ë ¿���¿vÎ Ý Â��Ó Ý Â��rÂ Ý Ó�� � Ý¿v»^Î��rÁ+Â Ý »^»���� Ý ¿vÎ��2¿�� Ý Ë �^Î���^Î Ý ¿v»��rÁ Ý Â+Ó�rÂ�� Ý�^Î�� �+Â Ý Á� � Ý Ó��rÂ Ý �+Î��^Î Ý Ë ¾��r¾ Ý ¿\Ë��2¿�� Ý»+Â�rÂ^Â Ý Ó Â�rÂ Ý Á�¿v» Ý ¾� ¾ Ý Ë Â^Â�� Ó�� Ý¿^¿\¾��r¾�Ó Ý »�Ó��2¿�� Ý ��� Ó Ý Â��� Â+Ó Ý ¿����¿\Ë Ý Ó����rÂ+Â Ý Ë
�����������(6.1)
6.2.1 Eigensystemof the EIES Subset
The eigensystemof the complex Hermitian matrix (ù Ñ ú Ç���È ø Ê ) is given in
Tabs.(6.17)and(6.18).In Fig.(6.28)all eigenvaluesaregivensortedby theiramount.Againfor better
visibility of symmetryFig.( 6.29) shows the positive and negative eigenvaluesrearranged.It is clearlyvisible from Fig.( 6.29)thata starlike structureemerges.
104 CHAPTER6
Fig.( 6.30) basedon Tab.( 6.12)shows, that while the largesteigenvaluecoversalreadymorethan �+ËqÌ of the variance,the two largesteigenvaluescover aboutÁ^ÂqÌ . Only thefirst two subspaceswill bediscussed.Thediversityof patternshasbeendiscussedin section 6.1.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7j
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
PSfragreplacements
µ��
Figure6.28:Eigenspectrumof theEIESdatasubsetsortedby amount
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
PSfragreplacements
µ��� ¼�µ ��
j,f
Figure6.29:Eigenspectrumof theEIESsubsetsortedby absolutevalue
The distribution of the eigenvector componentswithin the first and secondsubspaceis givenin Figs.(6.31)and( 6.33).Togetherwith thephasedistributionin Figs.(6.32and 6.34)thesamebehavior asin thecompletedatasetcanbeseen.Namely, that thereis a stronglyconnectedpatternvisible in the first subspace,whereasthesecondsubspaceis predominantlyastarlikepattern.
CHAPTER6 105Ð Coveredvarianceper µ ö Cumulativecoveredvariance��� "! Æ Ä Ü �$# "! Æ Ä Ü 1 0.64 0.642 0.29 0.933 0.05 0.984 0.02 1.05
ã Ë 1.06
ã Ë 1.07
ã Ë 1.0
Table6.12:Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 6.18)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8k
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
% Ù& ô ö
Figure6.30:Cumulativecoveredvariancegivenin Tab.( 6.12)
The orthogonalprojectorof the first subspaceis againdecomposedinto therealpart,givenin Fig.( 6.35)andimaginarypart,givenin Fig.( 6.36). As canbeseenin Fig.( 6.35)theauthorswith IDs  and � havea low patternsimilarity withtheanchor(authorwith ID ¿ ). On theotherhandit canbeseenin Fig.( 6.36)thattheauthorwith ID ¿ sharesa moreinboundorientedpatternwith theauthorwithID » andamoreoutboundrelationshipto authorswith IDs Ó and Î . In additiontheauthorwith ID » shows a high inboundorientedcommunicationwith theauthorswith IDs Ó and Î .
Theseresultsreflectthe rearrangedmatrix given in Tab.( 6.13). The secondprojectorgivenin Figs.(6.37)and( 6.38)showsagaintheauthorwith ID ¿ astheanchorof astarwith ahighpatternsimilarity with theauthorswith IDs »½¼�Ó and Î .This resultis supportedby therearrangedadjacency matrix in Tab.( 6.14)wherethe inboundcharacterof Freeman(the authorwith ID ¿ ) is visible andalsothestrongconnectionto White (ID » ), Bernard(ID Ó ) andWellman(ID Î ).
106 CHAPTER6
14
72
56
3F
reeman
10
93+
127i84
+118i
115+
84i53
+57i
33+
23i17
+16i
Bernard
4127
+93i
034
+35i
22+
5i57
+57i
12+
9i17
+15i
Wellm
an7
118+
84i35
+34i
024
+15i
15+
10i45
+33i
5+
4iW
hite2
84+
115i5
+22i
15+
24i0
5+
9i4i
4+
10iD
oreian5
57+
53i57
+57i
10+
15i9
+5i
08
+8i
4+
3iM
ullins6
23+
33i9
+12i
33+
45i4
8+
8i0
3+
3iA
lba3
16+
17i15
+17i
4+
5i10
+4i
3+
4i3
+3i
0
Table6.13:S
ubmatrixbasedon
firsteigenvector1
24
75
63
Freem
an1
0115
+84i
93+
127i84
+118i
53+
57i33
+23i
17+
16iW
hite2
84+
115i0
5+
22i15
+24i
5+
9i4i
4+
10iB
ernard4
127+
93i22
+5i
034
+35i
57+
57i12
+9i
17+
15iW
ellman
7118
+84i
24+
15i35
+34i
015
+10i
45+
33i5
+4i
Doreian
557
+53i
9+
5i57
+57i
10+
15i0
8+
8i4
+3i
Mullins
623
+33i
49
+12i
33+
45i8
+8i
03
+3i
Alba
316
+17i
10+
4i15
+17i
4+
5i3
+4i
3+
3i0
Table6.14:S
ubmatricesbasedon
secondeigenvector
CHAPTER6 107
If the partial sumof the first two subspacesù ³>ô Ù
is taken (Tab.( 6.15),mul-tiplied with theeigenvaluesandthenrotatedback,it is clearly visible that com-paredto theoriginalmatrixF in Eq.(6.1) this is already, aspredictedaveryclosematch.Theremainingpartialsum
ù æXô 'asgivenin Tab.( 6.16)is decidedlysmaller
in every entry, andthusservesasa correctionfor thefirst partialsum. Themaincorrectionis takingplacedueto thecommunicationof Bernard(ID Ó ).
108 CHAPTER6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²�³(´�±
Figure6.31:Distributionof theabsolutevalueof theeigenvectorcomponentsforÛ¸³
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²�³(´ç¹
Figure6.32:Distributionof thephase¶Å· Û¸³(´ · µ ³û¹X¹
CHAPTER6 109
12
34
56
71
0.19
+0.
19i
113
+82
i17
+15
i10
0+
130i
51+
55i
33+
22i
80+
120i
282
+11
3i2.
9+
2.9i
4.8
+9.
3i7
+17
i12
+24
i9
+17
i7
+14
i3
15+
17i
9.3
+4.
8i2.
3+
2.3i
10+
11i
6.5
+6.
8i4.
4+
3.7i
8.6
+9.
5i4
130
+10
0i17
+7i
11+
10i
26+
26i
28+
26i
20+
16i
24+
22i
555
+51
i24
+12
i6.
8+
6.5i
26+
28i
19+
19i
13+
11i
23+
25i
622
+33
i17
+9i
3.7
+4.
4i16
+20
i11
+13
i7.
1+
7.1i
15+
18i
712
0+
80i
14+
7i9.
5+
8.6i
22+
24i
25+
23i
18+
15i
21+
21i
Tabl
e6.
15:P
artia
lsum
(*),+-1
23
45
67
1-0
.19
-0.
19i
2.5
+2.
4i0.
44+
0.85
i-3
.3-
3.4i
2.0
+2.
5i0.
13+
0.62
i1.
24-
0.68
i2
2.4
+2.
5i-2
.9-
2.9i
-0.8
0+
0.70
i-1
.8+
5.4i
-7.-
15.i
-9.-
13.i
7.7
+9.
5i3
0.85
+0.
44i
0.70
-0.
80i
-2.3
-2.
3i5.
4+
6.5i
-3.5
-2.
8i-1
.4-
0.6i
-4.6
-4.
5i4
-3.4
-3.
3i5.
4-
1.8i
6.5
+5.
4i-2
6.-
26.i
29.+
31.i
-7.8
-7.
3i10
.+13
.i5
2.5
+2.
0i-1
5.-
7.i
-2.8
-3.
5i31
.+29
.i-1
9.-
19.i
-5.0
-2.
6i-1
3.-
10.i
60.
62+
0.13
i-1
3.-
9.i
-0.6
-1.
4i-7
.3-
7.8i
-2.6
-5.
0i-7
.1-
7.1i
19.+
27.i
7-0
.68
+1.
24i
9.5
+7.
7i-4
.5-
4.6i
13.+
10.i
-10.
-13
.i27
.+19
.i-2
1.-
21.i
Tabl
e6.
16:P
artia
lsum
(*.,+/
110 CHAPTER6
011.00
-0.67-0.27
-0.160.07
0.04-0.01
21 30.62
0.760.056-0.005i
-0.073-0.021i0.027-0.039i
0.15-0.001i-0.059-0.026i
21 40.33+
0.06i-0.39-0.05i
-0.018-0.057i0.55+
0.07i0.12-0.16i
0.69-0.106-0.059i
2150.098-0.008i
-0.011-0.012i-0.121+
0.003i0.015+
0.004i-0.16+
0.03i0.118-0.037i
0.97
21 60.45-0.07i
-0.38+0.06i
0.65-0.20+
0.03i-0.35+
0.15i-0.18+
0.1i-0.001+
0.015i
2170.29-0.02i
-0.079-0.011i-0.55+
0.02i0.39-0.02i
-0.47+0.25i
-0.32+0.21i
-0.14+0.02i
2180.17+
0.01i-0.013-0.032i
0.22+0.001i
0.550.56
-0.51-0.11i0.15+
0.05i
219
0.40-0.06i-0.33+
0.07i-0.45+
0.03i-0.53+
0.13i0.42-0.11i
-0.16-0.04i-0.002+
0.014i
Table6.17:E
igensystemfor:
with; <=> ?@
01
1.00-0.67
-0.27-0.16
0.070.04
-0.01
A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D A ;A BC ;D
21 3
0.620
0.760
0.056-0.09
0.076-2.86
0.047-0.96
0.15-0.02
0.064-2.73
21 4
0.340.18
0.39-3.00
0.06-1.88
0.440.15
0.20-0.92
0.690
0.12-2.63
215
0.098-0.09
0.016-2.32
0.1213.12
0.0160.29
0.162.93
0.12-0.30
0.970
21 6
0.45-0.15
0.383.00
0.650
0.212.99
0.382.75
0.202.64
0.0151.67
217
0.29-0.07
0.080-3.00
0.563.10
0.39-0.04
0.532.64
0.382.56
0.143.0
3
218
0.170.05
0.034-1.97
0.220.02
0.550
0.560
0.52-2.94
0.160.34
219
0.41-0.15
0.342.93
0.453.07
0.552.91
0.44-0.25
0.16-2.89
0.0141.7
3
Table6.18:E
igensystemof:w
ith; <CA ;A EBC ;DD
CHAPTER6 111
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8l
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PSfragreplacements
± ²ÚÙ>´>±
Figure6.33:Distributionof theabsolutevalueof theeigenvectorcomponentsforÛ�Ù
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8l
-3.14
-1.57
0
1.57
3.14
PSfragreplacements
¶¸· ²ÚÙ>´Ï¹
Figure6.34:Distributionof phase¶¸· Û�Ù>´ · µ Ù�¹û¹
112 CHAPTER6
1 3 5 7
1
3
5
7
131
3
Figure6.35:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³
1 3 5 7
1
3
5
7
17
-17
Figure6.36:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³
CHAPTER6 113
1 3 5 7
1
3
5
7
67
-131
Figure6.37:Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù
1 3 5 7
1
3
5
7
12
-12
Figure6.38:Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù
114 CHAPTER6
6.2.2 Comparisonof subsetresultswith dichotomizedandsym-metrizied eigensystem
Tab.( 6.19) shows, that the anchorsdiffer dependingon the methodused. Therepresentationis againasin Tab.( 6.2). While themethodusedby Freemanstillshows thesameanchorin thefirst subspace,healreadyshowsWellman(ID Î ) astheanchorof thesecondsubspace.Freemanin his paperexplainsthatthis mightbedueto thedichotomization.Bernard(ID Ó ) whoseemsto bealessactivewriterbut avery importantmemberof thecommunityis clearlyvisiblewhenthemethodproposedin this bookis used.Not so,whenthemethodusedby Freemanis used.
H( µ ³ ) 1 4 7 2 5 6 3F(µ ³ ) 1 3 6 4 5 2 7
H( µ Ù ) 1 2 4 7 5 6 3F(µ Ù ) 7 2 4 5 3 6 1
H( µ æ ) 4 5 7 6 3 2 1F(µ æ ) 1 5 2 6 7 3 4
H( µ í ) 6 7 2 5 4 1 3F(µ í ) 6 5 7 2 4 3 1
H( µ ð ) 6 5 7 4 2 3 1F(µ ð ) 6 7 2 3 5 4 1
H( µ ñ ) 2 6 5 4 7 1 3F(µ ñ ) 4 3 5 6 2 7 1
H( µ ' ) 3 6 5 2 1 4 7F(µ ' ) 4 3 1 7 2 6 5
Table6.19:Comparisonof anchorsfor theEIESsubset
As couldbeshown, themethodis capableto presenta view on thecommuni-cationpatternsbasedon inboundandoutboundtraffic within a group.Comparedto the standardmethodsit revealsa clearerpicture. In the examplesusedsomeinsightscould be gainedinto the structureof the respective groups.For the fullEIESdatasetthefollowing resultscanbestated:F Sincetheentriesof theadjacency matrix alsoincludemessagessentto all
othermembers,thusdiluting thepersonto personcommunication,it canbestatedthat the first two subspacescontaina lot of datanoisedueto thesemessages“to no onein particular”.F Freeman(ID ¿ ) is theanchorof thefirst two subspaces.He is thecenterofaninboundorientedstarandalsoanimportantmemberof a largeconnected
CHAPTER6 115
subgroup.Thefact thatFreemanwasthe“administrator”of thecommuni-cationsystemmakesthatplausible.F Wellman(ID »+Á ) alsois a very importantmemberof thegroup.For onehecommunicatesvery extensively (outboundoriented)andalsoservesasananchorfor subspacethree.He alsoseemsto betheconnectionbetweenthegroupsaroundFreemanandBernard.F Whenthenext subspaces,especiallysubspaces and � areinspected,theyreveal that Bernard(ID ¾ ) is a very importantmemberof the community.He is also the centerof a star and an importantmemberof a connectedsubgroup.
For thesubsetthefollowing resultscanbestated:F Thefirst two subspacesalreadycovermorethan Á^ËqÌ of thevarianceof thedata.F Freeman(ID ¿ ) is againtheanchorof a inboundorientedstarandalsotheimportantmemberof thealmostcompletegraph.
Chapter 7
Conclusionand Futur eApplications
SNA providesa rich toolbox to analyzeandinterpretnetworks betweenhumanactors.The focusof this book is to presenta generalizedmethodfor oneof thetool setsavailablein SNA, namelytheeigenvectorcentrality. Thestandardmethodneedsproperdatapreparationbeforethe resultscan be interpretedin a usefulway. This is dueto thefactthatneitherimaginaryeigenvalueshave founda goodinterpretationin social sciencesnor have imaginaryeigenvectors. Both canbethe resultof an eigensystemcalculatedfor an asymmetricadjacency matrix. Tocircumvent theseproblemsdatahadto bemadesymmetric,which meantlossofinformation.
Theuseof theproposedgeneralizedapproachbasedon theeigensystemanal-ysis of complex Hermitianadjacency matricesobviously solvesthe problemofhaving to adjustasymmetricdatasoasto befit to beanalyzedwith standardrealvaluedeigensystemanalysis. The suggestedsolution is basedon the fact, thatcomplex numberscanstoremoreinformationthanreal numbersandthusno exanteassumptionsor filters have to beappliedto thedatathatmight distort there-sultsobtained.In Hilbert spacethenorm,andthusthedistances,is definedby theinnerproduct.Thereis no needto definesimilaritiesor any otherconstructusedin thestandardmethodswhendealingwith asymmetricdata. This is usedwhenrepresentinginboundandoutboundtraffic by therealpartandtheimaginarypartof thecomplex matrix entry. Theeigensystemsof suchmatricesallow for moredetailedinterpretationof theunderlyingcommunicationpatternsaswasupto nowpossible.Sinceall eigenvaluesarereal,anddependon the traffic volume,it caneasilybeassumed,that they canbe interpretedasdistinct “energy levels” withinthegroup.Sinceeigenvectorsof Hermitianmatricesdefineanorthogonalsystemit canfurtherbeassumed,thattheeigenvectorscanbeviewedasindependentwithrespectto their inherentcommunicationpatternstructure.Theeigenvectorcom-ponentsrepresentthemembersof thegroup. Thestatusor rankof eachmemberis givenby theabsolutevalueof theeigenvectorcomponentat eachenergy level.
117
118 CHAPTER7
The phasecontainsinformation aboutthe directionalsimilarity of the memberwith respectof thepatterngovernedby theanchor. Thuseventheanchorof thecompletegroupcanbe identified. He/Sheis representedasthe highestabsolutevalueeigenvectorcomponentbelongingto thehighestabsolutevalueeigenvalue.In addition the possibility to constructcompletesubspacesgives the chancetoanalyzein moredetailthesubstructuresof thegroup.
7.1 Futur eApplications
7.1.1 Mark ets
As a motivatingexamplefor further applicationstake a look at forecastingmar-kets, especiallyforecastingmarkets like Internetbasedpolitical stock markets.Eachtradecanbeviewedasa communicationbetweena traderanda share.Alltransactionsareloggedin theorderbookandarethusavailable.As caneasilybeseenany suchmarket canbe viewed asa bipartitegraph,andthusthespectrumwill bequalitatively liketheonegivenin Eq.(3.63).Theefficiency of marketsde-pendstronglyon theinformationflow within themarket. And this againdependson themarketstructure.
Preliminaryexperimentalresults,obtainedon a political stockmarket hostedat the Chair for InformationServicesandElectronicMarketsat the UniversitatKarlsruhe(TH) (seeTab.( 7.1 for resultsof the election),RMSE (Root Mean
SquareError)= G �IH ÜJ ), suggestthattheexpectedbehavior canbemadevisible.A stockmarket canbeseenasa bipartitegraphasin Fig.( 7.1). Thegraph K ÑLNM ¼PORQ>¼POTS*U consistsof vertices ORQ representingthe tradersin the market and O�Srepresentingtheshares.
In % Result Result Result OfficialPSM (normalized) Sudwest-Presse result
CDU 39,10 39,18 39,27 44,80SPD 33,00 33,07 31,68 33,30FDP 8,90 8,92 9,51 8,10B90/Grune 9,00 9,02 8,99 7,70REP 7,20 7,21 7,79 4,40Sonstige 2,60 2,61 2,76 1,70Summe 99,80 100,00 100,00 100,00
RMSE 4,356 4,280 4,947
Table7.1: Forecastedresultsvs. actualresultsof 2001diet electionsin Baden-Wurttemberg
CHAPTER7 119
TraderShareMarkets
Figure7.1: Stockmarket asbipartite-graph
If for examplethe market is dominatedby a monopolist,this could be rep-resentedas a star graphlike structure,which -as we have seen- can easily bedetectedwith the method. If on the otherhandthe market is an oligopoly, therepresentationasagraphwouldbeaconnectedif notevenacompletegraph.If itis now takeninto account,thattransactions,likecommunication,arerecordedasatwo-way flow, it is feasibleto usethemethodof Hermitianadjacency matricestoanalyzemarkettransactionsandthusgaininsightinto marketstructureandmarketefficiency.
It wasfound that if a shareis the anchorof a star, thenthe traderswith thenext highestabsoluteeigenvectorcomponentsarethosethat tradeheavily in theshare.On theotherhand,if a traderis theanchorof a star, thesharethathe/shetradesmostoften in, is identifiableby it´s absoluteeigenvectorcomponent.Theeigenvaluesagainshow thevolume,if oneusestheexchangedamountsof moneyasthe weightson the edges
M. Thusan edge Ç�VÑ Ë if a traderboughtor sold
shares.As our market offeredalsoa primary market, wheretraderscould buyportfolios, we alsohadthe opportunityto checkfor arbitragetraders.This waspossibleby checkingfor the eigenvectorwith the portfolio asanchoror for theindex of theportfolio in any eigenvector. Thehighestrankedtraderin thateigen-vectorcouldbe identifiedasanarbitragetrader. It is alsopossibleto show, howefficient information is distributedwithin this market. If the absolutevaluesofthe eigenvectorcomponentsshow an uniform distribution , then as wasshownin chapter 4 this pointstowardsa completegraph. This leadsto the interpreta-tion of equallydistributedinformationwithin thatmarket. Informationefficiencyis a prerequisitefor market efficiency. This shouldbe further investigated.Theeigenspectralanalysisover time couldalsoyield someinsight into stockmarket
120 CHAPTER7
behavior.A market,wherenetworking playsanimportantrole hasalwaysbeenthejob
market. As Arrow and Borzekowski point out in their recentdiscussionpaper( [AB04]) the network effect is morerelevantwithin a groupof similar situatedworkers.
7.1.2 Organization Analysis
Anotherapplicationareais thatof theanalysisof organizationalbehavior. Krack-hardtandHanson[KH93] show in theirarticlehow theknowledgeaboutthesocialnetworkswithin a company canhelpmanagementto useresourcesbetter. Ahujaet al. [AGC03] show, that the centralityof a groupmember, measuredin emailexchangeis a very goodpredictorof performanceof thesaidmember. They alsohadthe alreadymentionedproblemof asymmetricdata. If now the analysisofasymmetricdatacanbe achieved, and the statusof a membercalculatedbasedon asymmetriccommunicationbehavior, thenthe predictionaboutperformancecouldimprove.
7.1.3 Viral Mark eting
Viral Marketing,amodernword for “wordof mouth” whichwith theInternetbe-camea word-of-mouse(seeHelm [Hel00]), hasgainedwide interestin the pastyearsasa meansto usesocialnetworksto market new products.SubramaniandRajagopalan[SR03b] for examplesuggesta framework basedon socialnetworkconsiderationsto enhancetheoutcomeof viral marketingefforts. As of now viralmarketingcampaignsaremoreor lessanecdotalin planningandoutcome,sincethe underlyingmechanicsarenot yet well investigated.While the generalchar-acteristicsof epidemiologyarewell known, themechanicsthathelpto “spread”amarketing“virus” arestill underinvestigation.But if onecouldusethecommuni-cationwithin aknown scale-freenetwork andanalyzeit with theappropriatetools(e.g. theoneproposedin this work), onemight find a way to setup viral market-ing campaignsmoreeffectively. DomingosandRichardson[DR01] havealreadyintroduceda way to calculatethe network valueof customers.Network valueis in this paperdefinedas the expectedprofit from salesto other customers shemay influenceto buy, the customers thosemay influenceand so on recursively.This makesnetwork analysisapplicablein CustomerRelationshipManagement(CRM). But to find out who getsinfluencedto buy by whom is a very difficulttask, and Domingosand Richardsonmodel this network as a Markov randomfield asagoodfirst approximation.
CHAPTER7 121
7.2 Outlook
Someinterestingquestionsfor furtherinvestigationarefor exampletheevolutionof suchnetworks,andhow they canbeanalyzedor evenpredictedwith thehelpofthis method.Thepossibilityto applywell known methodsof perturbationtheoryfrom physicsto the Hermitianmatricesusedhere,might bring new insight intothedynamicsof grouppatternsandstructures.
Another interestingquestionwould be the comparisonwith a context basedanalysisof email traffic. It could well be, that the structurewe find throughthemereexistenceof communicationmight give a clueasto the topicsdiscussedinthat substructure.This is alreadybeinginvestigatedin the Internetlink researchcommunity.
As could be shown the proposedmethodnot only yields more insight intoasymmetricand thus more generalizedcommunicationstructures,but also hassomepotentialfor furtherapplicationsin severalfields. With theproblemof in-formationoverflow andtheresultingneedto structurethis informationit is safetopredictthatthesemethodswill gainevermorerelevance.
124 CHAPTER7 WX1
23
45
67
81.0
-0.56-0.31
-0.230.17
0.095-0.092
-0.059
YX Z0.56
0.74-0.009
-0.118i
0.078+
0.041i-0.127-
0.018i0.116
-0.033i
-0.20+
0.04i0.011
-0.039i
YX [0.32
+0.06i
-0.39-
0.05i0.030+
0.109i-0.41
-0.11i
-0.18+
0.06i0.46
-0.095+0.103i
-0.12-
0.24i
YX\0.014+
0.011i-0.0093-0.0061i-0.0116+
0.0018i0.0087+0.0032i-0.016-
0.022i0.043+
0.047i0.016
-0.020i-0.014+
0.049iYX ]
0.073+0.005i
-0.026-0.006i
-0.019+0.002i
0.021+
0.003i0.043
-0.005i
-0.006-
0.025i-0.028
-0.032i-0.102+
0.081iYX^
0.026+0.002i
-0.010+0.010i
0.0110+0.0012i
0.007-0.015i
-0.053-0.018i
-0.024+0.021i
0.009-
0.023i-0.046+0.008i
YX_0.066
-0.002i
-0.044-0.001i
-0.030-
0.005i-0.043-
0.002i-0.050+
0.031i-0.037
-0.047i
0.069-
0.015i0.112+
0.009i
YX`0.022+
0.016i-0.026-
0.005i-0.0045+
0.0025i0.007
+0.021i
-0.027-0.018i
0.091+0.090i
0.021-
0.006i0.011+
0.131i
YXa0.35
+0.01i
-0.14-
0.15i0.69
-0.071-0.033i
0.49-0.24
+0.06i
-0.042-
0.045i0.121+0.030i
YXb0.071+
0.030i-0.018-
0.029i0.091+
0.044i0.027
+0.036i
0.110+0.056i
0.21+
0.01i-0.17
-0.03i
-0.13+
0.07i
YX Zc0.081+
0.012i0.019+
0.004i0.048
-0.010i
-0.096-0.052i
-0.098-0.032i
-0.14+
0.004i0.072+
0.012i0.035
+0.004
YX ZZ
0.21+
0.006i-0.102+
0.038i-0.28
+0.05i
-0.119-0.056i
0.20-
0.02i0.035+
0.113i-0.39
-0.004i
-0.34+
0.10i
YX Z[
0.042+0.016i
0.040-0.010i
0.004-
0.032i-0.14
-0.04i
-0.096-0.027i-0.139+
0.0001i0.041-
0.049i-0.11
+0.10i
YX Z\
0.020+0.016i0.0023+
0.0044i0.0086-0.0039i
-0.039-0.033i
-0.045-0.038i
0.039+0.020i
0.014-
0.019i0.06
+0.14i
YX Z]
0.040+0.018i
0.009-0.012i
0.015-
0.005i-0.125-
0.042i-0.129-
0.057i-0.058+
0.010i0.074+
0.003i-0.092+0.031i
YX Z^
0.081-
0.005i-0.064+
0.024i0.024+
0.013i-0.20
-0.02i
-0.19-
0.02i0.023
-0.027i
0.095-
0.078i0.005+
0.131i
YX Z_
0.076+0.020i
-0.016+0.008i
-0.023-
0.009i-0.059-
0.001i-0.100-
0.032i0.036+
0.058i0.15
-0.08i
0.04+
0.21i
YX Z`
0.069+0.012i
-0.048+0.007i
-0.058-
0.003i-0.0018-
0.0020i0.054+0.011i
0.036+0.055i
0.035-
0.030i0.082+
0.086i
YX Za
0.056+0.010i
-0.064-0.001i
-0.018-
0.003i-0.047-
0.005i0.014+
0.017i0.14
+0.06i
-0.124-
0.005i0.30
+0.07i
YX Zb
0.022+0.014i
-0.015-0.009i
-0.036-
0.005i-0.016-
0.024i0.013
-0.014i
-0.007+0.012i
-0.086-
0.038i0.073+0.003i
YX [c
0.015+0.014i-0.0059-
0.0092i-0.0036-0.0034i
-0.015-0.003i
-0.036-0.028i
0.004+0.016i
0.040+0.003i-0.043+
0.036i
YX [Z
0.020+0.013i0.0060+
0.0056i0.016+
0.0007i-0.045-
0.029i-0.057-
0.042i-0.014
-0.003i
0.079+0.007i-0.017+
0.038i
YX [[
0.049+0.030i
0.019+0.006i
0.034+0.003i
-0.060-0.071i
-0.17-
0.10i-0.27
-0.11i
0.027-
0.018i-0.21
+0.04i
YX [\
0.022+0.012i-0.0006-
0.0089i-0.0030-0.0052i
-0.034-0.007i
-0.062-0.024i
-0.012+0.013i
0.028-
0.003i-0.039+0.058i
YX []
0.16+
0.01i0.024-
0.029i-0.026
-0.038i
-0.42-
0.10i-0.29
-0.06i
-0.41-
0.04i0.17
-0.03i
0.069-
0.031i
YX [^
0.028+0.006i
-0.035+0.003i
0.0060+0.0106i
0.026-0.004i
-0.059-0.006i
0.012+0.092i
-0.071-
0.011i0.095
+0.077i
YX [_
0.042+0.018i
-0.056-0.024i
-0.009+0.012i
-0.028+0.006i
-0.059-0.024i
0.067+0.008i
0.093+0.049i0.009+
0.088i
YX [`
0.088+0.022i
-0.020-0.022i
0.020+0.009i
-0.051-0.041i
0.011+0.015i
0.030-
0.075i0.092
-0.017i
-0.27-
0.06i
YX [a
0.014+0.009i-0.0110-
0.0030i0.0066-0.00005i
0.020+
0.015i-0.016-
0.011i0.076+
0.040i0.008
-0.025i-0.038+
0.096i
YX [b
0.41-
0.05i-0.42
+0.12i
-0.09+
0.12i0.60
-0.33+
0.02i-0.28
-0.007i
-0.13+
0.07i0.062
-0.036i
YX\c
0.099+0.023i
-0.008+0.030i
-0.33-
0.07i0.015
+0.026i
0.36+
0.08i-0.26
+0.08i
0.025+0.052i
-0.32-
0.04i
YX\ Z
0.23+
0.06i0.026-
0.051i0.084
-0.021i
0.27+
0.11i0.019+
0.008i0.27
+0.18i
0.70-0.18
-0.07i
YX\ [
0.28-
0.004i-0.062+
0.093i-0.50
+0.01i
-0.16-
0.07i0.39
+0.03i
-0.048-
0.105i0.29
-0.003i
0.41
Table7.2:F
ullEIE
Sdataseteigensystem
:03to0d
CHAPTER7 125
egf
910
1112
1314
1516
-0.0
490.
047
-0.0
420.
041
-0.0
360.
033
-0.0
280.
017
h f i -0.021
+0.
042i
-0.0
24+
0.03
3i0.
0022
-0.
0090
i-0.
102+
0.04
6i-0
.051
+0.
041i
0.04
9-
0.00
6i-0
.011
-0.
019i
-0.0
03-
0.02
2i
h f j -0.091
-0.
010i
-0.0
64+
0.02
7i-0
.042
-0.
067i
-0.1
5+
0.09
i-0
.16
+0.
02i
0.13
3+0.
026i
-0.1
2-
0.13
i0.
14+
0.04
i
h f k 0.051
-0.
001i
-0.0
44-
0.03
1i-0
.016
-0.
006i
-0.0
74+
0.04
1i0.
032
-0.
036i
0.02
8+0.
029i
0.06
5+0.
078i
-0.0
20+
0.07
4i
h f l 0.010
-0.
040i
0.19
-0.
34i
0.59
0.21
-0.
02i
0.17
-0.
03i
0.37
-0.1
7-
0.06
i0.
092+
0.06
2i
h f m 0.086
+0.
070i
-0.0
43+
0.01
2i0.
0060
-0.
0047
i0.
035
-0.
031i
-0.0
75+
0.11
3i-0
.021
+0.
009i
-0.0
20+
0.08
5i0.
12+
0.13
i
h f n 0.1
4-
0.06
i-0
.110
+0.
011i
0.03
1-
0.00
5i0.
10+
0.16
i0.
099
-0.
031i
-0.0
32+
0.03
7i0.
11-
0.12
i-0
.23
-0.
15i
h f o 0.066
+0.
035i
-0.0
77-
0.04
3i-0
.030
+0.
017i
-0.0
17+
0.05
3i0.
121+
0.06
6i-0
.061
+0.
031i
0.08
7+0.
079i
0.12
+0.
12i
h f p 0.065
+0.
008i
-0.0
55+
0.09
0i0.
056+
0.02
7i-0
.033
+0.
001i
-0.0
36+
0.01
4i0.
035+
0.01
8i0.
036+
0.04
6i-0
.010
-0.
010i
h f q -0.1
7-
0.02
i0.
42-0
.25
-0.
12i
0.03
-0.
18i
0.59
-0.1
5-
0.17
i0.
058
-0.
076i
0.08
+0.
21i
h f ir 0.1
8+
0.00
7i0.
06-
0.25
i-0
.51
-0.
16i
0.31
-0.
07i
-0.0
76-
0.01
1i0.
32+
0.03
i-0
.18
-0.
12i
-0.1
7-
0.02
i
h f ii 0.1
5-
0.04
i-0
.117
-0.
073i
0.10
0+0.
045i
0.35
-0.1
06-
0.05
0i-0
.28
+0.
08i
-0.0
4+
0.21
i-0
.13
-0.
10i
h f ij 0.119
+0.
013i
0.02
4-0.
0002
i0.
032
-0.
020i
-0.1
7-
0.04
i0.
059
-0.
080i
0.04
9-
0.03
5i0.
024
-0.
005i
-0.1
03-
0.00
4i
h f ik 0.000
1+0.
120i
0.13
+0.
09i
0.00
7+0.
048i
0.03
1-
0.09
9i0.
035+
0.10
8i-0
.008
-0.
18i
-0.2
3-
0.24
i-0
.20
-0.
17i
h f il 0.135
+0.
039i
-0.0
39+
0.01
2i0.
064
-0.
024i
-0.0
99+
0.04
9i0.
063
-0.
047i
0.04
7-
0.01
6i-0
.112
-0.
047i
0.08
+0.
24i
h f im 0.1
5-
0.01
i-0
.018
+0.
044i
0.00
7+0.
028i
-0.2
1+
0.09
i0.
17-
0.10
i-0
.010
-0.
034i
-0.0
17+
0.06
5i-0
.29
-0.
06i
h f in 0.12
3-
0.02
1i-0
.123
-0.
049i
-0.0
81+
0.06
9i-0
.06
+0.
18i
0.19
+0.
03i
0.10
8+0.
005i
0.28
+0.
05i
-0.0
29+
0.04
7i
h f io -0.04
3+0.
069i
-0.0
95-0
.040
i-0
.028
+0.
094i
-0.0
7+
0.16
i0.
18+
0.00
01i
0.09
6-
0.01
6i-0
.109
+0.
086i
-0.1
5-
0.00
6i
h f ip 0.061
+0.
118i
-0.1
6-
0.12
i-0
.039
-0.
009i
0.24
+0.
05i
0.24
+0.
13i
-0.3
0-
0.00
6i-0
.021
-0.
061i
-0.2
1-
0.11
i
h f iq -0.02
1+0.
001i
0.13
-0.
22i
-0.3
4+
0.07
i0.
26+
0.09
i-0
.085
+0.
036i
0.31
+0.
14i
0.23
+0.
15i
0.08
3+0.
089i
h f jr 0.043
+0.
005i
0.01
1-
0.02
3i0.
053+
0.10
7i-0
.034
+0.
021i
0.06
0+0.
028i
0.08
7+0.
099i
0.03
7+0.
117i
-0.0
48-
0.03
7i
h f ji 0.054
+0.
030i
-0.0
30+
0.01
0i0.
009
-0.
013i
-0.0
62+
0.00
8i0.
050
-0.
003i
0.00
85+
0.01
10i
0.01
3-
0.02
1i-0
.060
-0.
005i
h f jj
0.55
0.05
+0.
15i
-0.0
24-
0.00
9i0.
11-
0.13
i0.
038
-0.
005i
-0.1
7-
0.01
i-0
.06
-0.
24i
0.24
+0.
12i
h f jk 0.023
+0.
016i
0.00
2-
0.09
2i0.
23+
0.07
i0.
071
-0.
023i
0.12
6+0.
005i
0.22
+0.
06i
0.10
0+0.
079i
-0.1
05+
0.07
0i
h f jl -0.5
2+
0.09
i0.
016+
0.08
7i0.
064+
0.04
0i0.
25-
0.08
i0.
113
-0.
068i
-0.1
8+
0.04
i0.
09+
0.15
i0.
104
-0.
018i
h f jm 0.15
-0.
002i
-0.0
54+
0.03
8i-0
.027
+0.
013i
0.12
3+
0.05
6i0.
025+
0.13
4i-0
.16
+0.
04i
0.15
+0.
01i
0.39
h f jn 0.122
+0.
020i
-0.0
91-
0.00
4i0.
032+
0.00
3i-0
.052
+0.
032i
0.13
8+0.
004i
0.02
0+0.
022i
0.12
7+0.
006i
0.05
7-
0.05
2i
h f jo 0.0
5-
0.22
i0.
31-
0.13
i-0
.004
6+0.
0125
i-0.
072-
0.09
7i-0
.23
-0.
17i
-0.1
6-
0.23
i0.
50-0
.26
-0.
08i
h f jp 0.022
+0.
035i
0.02
2-
0.01
0i-0
.041
+0.
0001
i-0.
068+
0.02
5i0.
077+
0.01
1i0.
050+
0.02
9i0.
013+
0.10
3i0.
097+
0.08
5i
h f jq -0.07
6+0.
025i
0.06
3+0.
032i
-0.0
15+
0.02
1i-0
.093
-0.
009i
0.00
5+0.
033i
0.01
3-
0.03
6i0.
014+
0.02
7i-0
.059
+0.
007i
h f kr -0.1
3-
0.10
i-0
.31
+0.
14i
-0.1
6-
0.08
i-0
.14
+0.
09i
0.29
-0.
13i
0.17
+0.
09i
0.06
-0.
17i
0.02
6+0.
008i
h f ki -0.03
8-
0.06
8i-0
.10
-0.
10i
0.01
8-
0.03
6i0.
27-
0.02
i-0
.009
-0.
048i
-0.1
9+
0.07
i-0
.078
+0.
003i
0.03
2+0.
011i
h f kj 0.1
4+
0.03
i0.
26-
0.01
i0.
034
-0.
013i
-0.1
3-
0.14
i-0
.11
+0.
15i
-0.0
17-
0.07
1i-0
.001
13+
0.00
034i
0.11
2+0.
071i
Tabl
e7.
3:F
ullE
IES
data
sete
igen
syst
em:sut to
s )v
126 CHAPTER7 WX17
1819
2021
2223
24-0.016
0.014-0.013
-0.0110.010
0.0086-0.0071
0.0061
YX Z0.023-
0.031i-0.018-
0.013i-0.021
-0.009i-0.024+
0.022i-0.021
-0.012i
-0.031-0.021i
0.0050-0.0069i
-0.014+0.035i
YX [0.093-
0.024i0.0086+
0.0013i-0.023-
0.034i-0.122-0.027i
-0.066-
0.018i0.021
-0.050i
-0.067+0.019i
0.041-
0.020i
YX\-0.073+
0.001i0.21
+0.05i
-0.28-
0.11i0.34
-0.26+
0.04i0.052
+0.032i
-0.29+
0.08i-0.028
-0.091i
YX ]0.09
+0.22i
0.048-
0.059i-0.22
+0.08i
-0.047+0.026i
-0.042-
0.029i-0.16
+0.08i
-0.010-0.030i
-0.002+0.051i
YX^-0.088+
0.030i0.11
-0.19i
-0.011+0.028i
-0.15-
0.08i-0.16
+0.02i
0.050-
0.015i0.14
-0.31i
0.50YX_
0.43-0.133+
0.046i-0.06
-0.21i
-0.19-
0.13i-0.022
-0.072i
0.0135-0.0031i
-0.06+
0.16i-0.07
+0.18i
YX`-0.049+
0.055i0.0001+
0.032i-0.053
-0.010i
0.04+
0.29i-0.06
-0.20i
0.014-
0.068i0.04
+0.15i
0.35+
0.23i
YXa-0.018-
0.017i-0.0005-0.0035i0.008+
0.015i0.053
-0.013i0.0098+
0.0034i0.0047+0.0073i
0.018+0.005i
0.00006-0.0026i
YXb0.076
+0.026i
-0.13+
0.09i0.027
-0.035i
-0.003-0.111i
0.050-
0.017i0.068
+0.065i
-0.004-0.022i
-0.023+0.015i
YX Zc-0.21
+0.32i
-0.127+0.001i
-0.16-
0.02i0.010+
0.054i-0.036
-0.034i
0.15-
0.15i0.060
-0.023i
-0.066-
0.017i
YX ZZ
-0.16-
0.01i-0.09
+0.21i
0.085+0.062i
0.15-
0.10i0.037+
0.036i0.043
+0.064i
0.0072-0.0001i
-0.034-
0.017i
YX Z[
0.047+
0.067i0.079
+0.050i
-0.098-
0.004i-0.16
+0.04i
0.42-0.069+
0.116i-0.14
+0.13i
0.27-
0.18i
YX Z\
0.050-0.128i
0.39-0.010+
0.044i0.31
-0.05i
-0.18-
0.06i0.13
+0.08i
-0.31+
0.07i0.036+
0.061i
YX Z]
0.071+
0.116i0.26
+0.07i
0.27-
0.19i0.17
+0.20i
0.08+
0.34i-0.01
+0.25i
0.39-0.30
-0.03i
YX Z^
-0.24+
0.03i-0.004-
0.062i0.03
+0.18i
0.13-
0.08i0.28
-0.21i
-0.33+
0.05i-0.015-
0.059i0.082+
0.082i
YX Z_
-0.05-
0.22i-0.19
+0.21i
-0.32+
0.12i-0.037-
0.111i-0.13
+0.29i
0.11+
0.24i0.15
-0.13i
-0.0052+0.0128i
YX Z`
-0.15+
0.05i0.006-
0.17i0.39
-0.19+
0.21i-0.19
+0.15i
0.23+
0.05i-0.18
-0.17i
-0.06+
0.17i
YX Za
0.107-0.021i
0.27-
0.13i-0.12
-0.17i
-0.17+
0.16i-0.012+
0.018i-0.21
-0.06i
0.18-
0.15i-0.02
-0.17i
YX Zb
0.17-
0.33i0.19
-0.11i
0.30+
0.03i0.095
-0.048i
0.16+
0.05i-0.30
+0.12i
-0.16+
0.09i0.070
-0.008i
YX [c
0.16-
0.06i-0.039-
0.061i0.002+
0.089i0.15
+0.004i
-0.040-
0.090i0.36
-0.022+0.020i
-0.033-
0.102i
YX [Z
0.0001+0.048i
-0.10+
0.11i0.080
-0.056i
-0.029+0.064i-0.034+
0.112i0.15
+0.22i
-0.18+
0.19i0.21
+0.06i
YX [[
0.16-
0.14i-0.010-
0.027i0.19
+0.03i
-0.069-0.094i
-0.15-
0.10i0.007
-0.084i
-0.067-0.055i
0.017-
0.009i
YX [\
0.12-
0.26i-0.013-
0.058i0.17
+0.05i
-0.050+0.085i
0.005-
0.050i0.18
-0.28i
-0.028-0.075i
0.005-
0.047i
YX []
-0.035+0.034i
-0.009-0.018i
-0.008+0.020i
0.044-
0.012i-0.097
-0.043i
0.007-
0.020i-0.0031+
0.0128i-0.033
-0.012i
YX [^
-0.083+0.114i
0.12-
0.16i-0.17
+0.21i
-0.15+
0.22i-0.018+
0.050i-0.044+
0.056i-0.16
+0.29i
-0.16+
0.22i
YX [_
-0.041+0.017i
-0.139-0.016i
0.059+0.063i
0.067-
0.007i-0.04
-0.22i
-0.05-
0.21i0.040
-0.025i
-0.25-
0.03i
YX [`
0.014+
0.077i0.18
-0.25i
-0.054+0.029i
-0.05+
0.24i-0.14
+0.08i
0.049-
0.035i0.072
-0.076i
-0.032+0.058i
YX [a
-0.15-
0.04i0.006
+0.033i
0.063+0.092i
0.22+
0.13i-0.07
-0.15i
-0.011-0.123i
0.15+
0.03i0.026+
0.118i
YX [b
0.010+
0.018i-0.005+
0.018i-0.014
-0.009i
0.039+0.019i
0.054+0.009i
0.0003+0.0139i
0.024-
0.009i0.002
-0.027i
YX\c
0.027+
0.093i0.24
-0.18i
-0.038-
0.052i-0.048-0.073i
-0.039-
0.040i-0.021-
0.110i-0.001+
0.071i0.066
-0.003i
YX\ Z
-0.042-0.008i
0.063+
0.041i0.112+
0.003i-0.003-
0.097i0.094
-0.022i
-0.032+0.033i
-0.071+0.042i
0.017-
0.092i
YX\ [
0.011-0.024i
-0.073+0.075i
0.0001+0.017i0.027+
0.025i0.050
-0.024i
0.022+
0.022i0.022
-0.024i
0.000132-0.000028i
Table7.4:F
ullEIE
Sdataseteigensystem
:039to046
CHAPTER7 127
egf
2526
2728
2930
3132
-0.0
052
0.00
45-0
.003
50.
0025
0.00
17-0
.000
900.
0002
50.
0000
74
h f i -0.012
1+0.
0017
i0.
012+
0.02
0i0.
0021
+0.
0053
i0.
021
-0.
006i
-0.0
043+
0.00
64i-0
.018
+0.
005i
-0.0
16+
0.01
4i0.
011
+0.
014i
h f j -0.0
16+
0.04
8i0.
002+
0.03
4i-0
.048
+0.
045i
0.01
16-
0.00
32i
-0.0
10-
0.02
2i0.
001
+0.
015i
0.07
0-0.
036i
0.00
27-
0.00
93i
h f k 0.06
8-0.
070i
0.50
-0.0
74+
0.10
4i-0
.117
-0.
068i
0.12
+0.
19i
-0.1
8+
0.06
i-0
.17
-0.
15i
-0.3
2+
0.05
i
h f l -0.0
58-
0.00
5i-0
.13
+0.
13i
-0.0
13+
0.03
5i-0
.031
-0.
016i
-0.0
01-
0.04
7i-0
.110
+0.
014i
-0.0
41+
0.00
8i-0
.050
+0.
064i
h f m
0.48
-0.0
65-
0.08
9i0.
11-
0.27
i-0
.098
+0.
059i
-0.0
4+
0.15
i-0
.084
+0.
073i
-0.2
4+
0.05
i-0
.025
+0.
008i
h f n 0.1
4-
0.10
i-0
.02
+0.
19i
0.13
-0.
10i
-0.1
6+
0.28
i0.
23+
0.16
i0.
18-
0.12
i-0
.27
-0.
07i
-0.0
09-
0.06
9i
h f o -0.
19-
0.31
i-0
.019
-0.
019i
-0.0
4+
0.32
i-0
.081
-0.
101i
-0.2
0-
0.03
i0.
41-0
.20
+0.
04i
0.13
+0.
08i
h f p -0.00
07-
0.02
2i-0
.010
1+0.
0010
i-0.0
053+
0.00
67i0
.009
1-0.
0007
i-0
.009
+0.
015i
0.01
6+
0.00
8i-0
.002
5-0.
0051
i-0.
0048
-0.
0039
i
h f q 0.06
8+
0.04
4i0.
089
-0.
049i
0.07
1-
0.08
3i-0
.048
+0.
005i
-0.0
13+
0.02
9i-0
.027
-0.
051i
-0.0
72-
0.01
1i0.
050
+0.
025i
h f ir 0.0
08-
0.03
0i0.
042
-0.
064i
0.01
7-
0.00
2i0.
028+
0.01
5i-0
.010
+0.
031i
0.04
1-0.
057i
0.04
7+
0.00
3i0.
060
-0.
053i
h f ii 0.0
04-
0.06
1i-0
.039
-0.
071i
0.01
5-
0.08
7i-0
.018
-0.
025i
0.01
3+0.
027i
0.07
8-0.
067i
-0.0
27+
0.03
4i-0
.033
-0.
022i
h f ij 0.1
3+
0.18
i0.
13-
0.16
i0.
120
-0.
023i
-0.0
9-
0.17
i0.
06-
0.20
i0.
29-
0.17
i0.
19+
0.08
i-0
.34
-0.
07i
h f ik 0.0
71+
0.00
1i-0
.27
-0.
08i
-0.0
7-
0.13
i0.
05+
0.16
i-0
.17
-0.
09i
0.18
+0.
10i
0.06
+0.
13i
0.04
-0.
14i
h f il
0.15
-0.
20i
0.08
1-
0.04
3i0.
0036
+0.
0062
i0.
057+
0.08
3i-0
.022
+0.
068i
0.09
8-0.
041i
-0.0
82+
0.08
3i0.
062
-0.
113i
h f im -0.0
98-
0.05
1i0.
13+
0.07
i-0
.091
-0.
102i
-0.0
36+
0.10
8i0.
020+
0.05
8i-0
.29
+0.
06i
-0.1
15+
0.07
6i0.
34-
0.01
i
h f in 0.0
01+
0.14
1i-0
.24
+0.
01i
-0.2
4+
0.05
i-0
.036
+0.
071i
-0.1
8-
0.03
i0.
003
+0.
053i
0.15
-0.
08i
-0.0
65-
0.04
3i
h f io -0.
25+
0.16
i0.
012
-0.
049i
0.00
4-
0.10
5i-0
.24
-0.
01i
0.11
-0.
19i
-0.0
7-
0.19
i-0
.13
+0.
13i
-0.1
8+
0.11
i
h f ip 0.0
08+
0.05
5i0.
017
-0.
112i
0.06
+0.
21i
0.08
-0.
15i
0.09
7-
0.08
1i-0
.12
+0.
19i
0.14
-0.
04i
0.00
9+
0.02
9i
h f iq 0.0
20-
0.00
3i-0
.09
+0.
12i
0.01
3+0.
033i
0.00
4-
0.05
8i-0
.045
+0.
022i
-0.0
44+
0.03
1i-0
.083
+0.
028i
-0.0
67+
0.04
5i
h f jr 0.3
4+
0.18
i-0
.014
+0.
073i
-0.0
8+
0.23
i0.
18-
0.36
i0.
31-
0.17
i-0
.04
-0.
16i
-0.1
3+
0.14
i0.
40
h f ji -0.
08-
0.29
i-0
.23
-0.
12i
0.47
0.35
-0.
14i
0.04
6+0.
048i
-0.3
7+
0.03
i0.
08-
0.23
i-0
.009
+0.
018i
h f jj -0.
18+
0.10
i0.
006+
0.04
3i-0
.11
+0.
18i
-0.0
94-
0.02
2i0.
027
-0.
083i
-0.1
5+
0.05
i0.
045-
0.07
6i-0
.05
+0.
14i
h f jk -0.1
04+
0.04
0i0.
29-
0.36
i0.
001
-0.
19i
0.14
+0.
07i
-0.0
7+
0.30
i0.
19+
0.07
i0.
22-
0.25
i0.
18-
0.04
i
h f jl -0.0
08-
0.03
5i-0
.042
+0.
021i
-0.0
17+
0.01
5i-0
.034
-0.
004i
0.01
3-
0.00
7i0.
012-
0.01
0i-0
.015
-0.
015i
-0.0
52+
0.03
7i
h f jm 0.0
38+
0.11
0i0.
121+
0.05
3i0.
001
-0.
33i
0.06
3-
0.03
7i0.
0049
+0.
0018
i-0
.06
-0.
15i
0.11
7+
0.00
5i0.
15-
0.30
i
h f jn 0.0
8+
0.14
i0.
005+
0.04
7i0.
21-
0.06
i0.
48-0
.25
-0.
03i
0.05
7+
0.12
4i-0
.25
+0.
30i
-0.3
9+
0.05
i
h f jo -0.0
60+
0.00
5i-0
.067
+0.
066i
0.04
7+0.
036i
0.03
5+0.
007i
-0.0
031+
0.00
68i0
.008
+0.
013i
-0.0
005+
0.00
62i-0
.003
7+0.
0008
i
h f jp 0.0
94+
0.01
3i-0
.12
+0.
22i
0.20
-0.
01i
-0.0
7+
0.25
i0.
550.
13+
0.22
i0.
41-0
.13
+0.
09i
h f jq -0.0
10-
0.01
7i-0
.005
-0.
021i
-0.0
03+
0.01
9i0.
014
-0.
005i
-0.0
056-
0.00
23i0
.011
+0.
012i
0.01
11-
0.00
29i
-0.0
11-
0.01
1i
h f kr 0.0
21+
0.01
2i-0
.066
+0.
069i
-0.0
56+
0.03
5i0.
095+
0.03
1i-0
.069
+0.
021i
-0.0
54+
0.05
0i0.
100-
0.02
7i0.
084
-0.
030i
h f ki 0.010
2+0.
0065
i0.
019
-0.
022i
-0.0
35-
0.02
1i-0
.035
+0.
010i
0.01
6-
0.04
1i0.
005-
0.01
9i0.
039-
0.00
4i0.
017
-0.
011i
h f kj 0.008
2-0.
0054
i0.
076
-0.
044i
0.02
3+0.
006i
-0.0
17-
0.00
02i
0.02
6+0.
009i
-0.0
06+
0.03
4i-0
.015
-0.
0002
i0.
029
-0.
001i
Tabl
e7.
5:F
ullE
IES
data
sete
igen
syst
em:s -w to
s .-
128 CHAPTER7
WX
11
0.30.3
0.240.24
0.170.17
YX Z
0.450.31
-0.1-0.024
0.340.03
-0.0360.35
YX [
0.015-0.1
-0.2-0.2
-0.0110.015
-0.22-0.028
YX\
-0.14-0.39
0.033-0.14
0.39-0.16
0.0340.091
YX ]
-0.0190.36
-0.034-0.25
0.05-0.23
0.06-0.21
YX^
-0.330.18
-0.018-0.087
0.26-0.11
-0.086-0.15
YX_
0.020.12
-0.0960.25
-0.26-0.2
-0.0310.046
YX`
0.29-0.24
0.140.0061
0.26-0.48
-0.11-0.0021
YXa
-0.057-0.032
-0.099-0.0075
-0.140.14
0.0920.47
YXb
0.14-0.22
-0.12-0.34
-0.0480.043
-0.051-0.15
YX Zc
-0.0360.076
0.190.53
0.065-0.2
-0.00097-0.033
YX ZZ
-0.0061-0.1
0.0180.05
-0.36-0.28
-0.0920.28
YX Z[
0.150.19
0.19-0.2
-0.170.044
-0.00430.00085
YX Z\0.19
0.220.02
0.016-0.016
0.034-0.023
0.056
YX Z]-0.0064-0.072
0.16-0.3
-0.15-0.013
-0.0370.15
YX Z^0.17
0.0190.0078
-0.18-0.39
-0.3-0.075
-0.016
YX Z_0.23
-0.22-0.22
0.250.15
0.10.066
-0.049
YX Z`0.004
-0.059-0.2
0.11-0.03
0.0550.036
-0.29YX Za
0.2-0.081
-0.120.026
-0.160.43
0.064-0.1
YX Zb-0.13
-0.22-0.37
0.0370.026
-0.14-0.023
-0.028
YX [c0.031
0.058-0.25
-0.14-0.14
-0.0380.26
0.023
YX [Z0.0046
0.19-0.33
-0.0730.11
-0.27-0.019
0.27
YX [[-0.042
-0.12-0.03
0.29-0.14
0.057-0.12
-0.02
YX [\0.052
-0.120.1
-0.210.095
0.17-0.063
0.14
YX []0.16
-0.230.48
-0.043-0.024
0.0210.022
0.076
YX [^
-0.072-0.059
0.18-0.16
-0.05-0.022
-0.22-0.19
YX [_
-0.250.063
0.037-0.065
0.080.062
0.140.24
YX [`
0.0220.0073
-0.0970.067
0.095-0.06
0.049-0.16
YX [a
0.29-0.075
-0.067-0.08
-0.073-0.18
-0.048-0.28
YX [b
-0.31-0.16
-0.12-0.024
-0.2-0.036
-0.190.2
YX\c
0.0220.25
0.0810.048
-0.028-0.021-0.35
-0.092
YX\ Z
0.13-0.016
-0.120.084
0.140.24
-0.680.069
YX\ [
-0.0980.055
-0.0044-0.12
0.088-0.099
-0.22-0.14
Table7.6:F
ullEIE
Sdataseteigensystemaccordingto
Freem
an03
to0d
CHAPTER7 129
exf 0.15
0.15
0.08
80.
088
0.06
70.
067
0.04
30.
043
h f i -0.012
0.1
0.23
-0.0
76-0
.065
-0.0
180.
056
-0.0
12
h f j -0.25
-0.2
10.
074
-0.2
6-0
.18
-0.2
1-0
.054
-0.2
6
h f k -0.15
0.27
-0.1
50.
038
0.06
50.
055
-0.0
15-0
.024
h f l 0.18
-0.1
7-0
.13
-0.2
10.
078
-0.0
27-0
.052
0.01
1
h f m 0.048
-0.0
12-0
.14
0.07
80.
220.
092
-0.0
6-0
.095
h f n 0.027
0.27
-0.5
3-0
.006
9-0
.1-0
.12
-0.3
1-0
.064
h f o 0.054
-0.0
015
0.17
0.12
0.19
0.11
-0.0
65-0
.042
h f p 0.083
-0.0
071
0.14
-0.1
50.
0004
1-0
.047
-0.2
90.
013
h f q -0.18
-0.4
7-0
.16
0.01
-0.0
075
0.00
27-0
.069
0.16
h f ir -0.14
-0.5
20.
14-0
.006
30.
110.
13-0
.12
-0.1
2
h f ii -0.15
-0.0
470.
011
0.21
0.06
6-0
.11
0.27
0.12
h f ij 0.19
-0.0
120.
056
-0.2
20.
20.
160.
250.
24
h f ik -0.2
-0.1
1-0
.23
0.00
76-0
.065
0.14
0.16
-0.4
4
h f il -0.15
-0.0
087
-0.1
90.
044
-0.0
40.
410.
07-0
.17
h f im -0.1
0.14
0.19
-0.0
045
0.25
0.16
-0.2
3-0
.26
h f in 0.31
-0.2
1-0
.38
0.13
0.14
-0.1
60.
380.
089
h f io 0.22
0.16
0.31
-0.0
760.
028
-0.0
049
0.07
1-0
.5
h f ip -0.017
0.08
30.
025
0.34
0.00
660.
39-0
.095
-0.0
79
h f iq 0.22
-0.0
73-0
.018
-0.1
9-0
.17
0.31
-0.1
40.
0095
h f jr -0.041
-0.1
50.
210.
41-0
.036
-0.3
-0.1
40.
095
h f ji 0.048
-0.0
53-0
.11
0.06
-0.3
90.
10.
21-0
.06
h f jj -0.24
0.03
40.
026
-0.3
6-0
.053
0.11
0.17
0.15
h f jk 0.29
-0.1
-0.1
7-0
.017
0.24
-0.2
1-0
.04
-0.2
4
h f jl 0.45
-0.1
4-0
.10.
0007
7-0
.43
-0.1
2-0
.076
-0.1
7
h f jm -0.027
-0.0
130.
150.
081
-0.2
8-0
.15
0.06
7-0
.11
h f jn 0.15
-0.1
9-0
.013
0.01
60.
086
0.34
-0.1
90.
093
h f jo 0.089
-0.0
270.
090.
13-0
.19
0.34
0.2
0.07
7
h f jp 0.099
0.18
-0.0
031
-0.2
4-0
.083
0.12
-0.1
80.
3
h f jq 0.3
-0.0
270.
13-0
.17
0.11
0.03
0.3
-0.0
92
h f kr 0.11
0.01
80.
0057
0.42
-0.0
750.
015
-0.2
0.11
h f ki 0.015
-0.0
57-0
.044
-0.0
170.
037
0.03
4-0
.19
0.11
h f kj -0.12
0.13
0.07
20.
22-0
.046
-0.0
450.
210.
079
Tabl
e7.
7:F
ullE
IES
data
sete
igen
syst
emac
cord
ingt
oF
reem
an
sut tos )v
130 CHAPTER7
WX
0.030.03
0.0210.021
0.0120.012
0.0120.012
YX Z
0.0510.046
-0.066-0.049
-0.061-0.057
-0.0260.34
YX [
-0.28-0.16
-0.17-0.22
-0.22-0.24
-0.25-0.065
YX\
0.190.13
-0.24-0.039
0.017-0.074
-0.014-0.1
YX ]
-0.0690.068
-0.18-0.0065
0.023-0.016
-0.034-0.21
YX^
-0.0078-0.29
0.10.16
-0.0750.086
0.120.53
YX_
-0.053-0.068
-0.021-0.058
-0.11-0.092
-0.0940.13
YX`
-0.19-0.3
0.0210.041
0.150.036
0.015-0.15
YXa
-0.0790.2
0.14-0.13
-0.0160.022
-0.0230.35
YXb
0.310.12
-0.0160.14
-0.0850.14
0.120.31
YX Zc
-0.0830.23
-0.0660.0066
0.13-0.12
-0.0710.094
YX ZZ
0.24-0.32
-0.250.044
-0.035-0.046
-0.0680.13
YX Z[
0.0019-0.12
-0.093-0.16
0.0240.16
0.05-0.003
YX Z\
0.36-0.0044-0.026
0.0910.24
-0.16-0.015-0.078
YX Z]-0.55
0.047-0.18
0.0140.055
0.19-0.037
0.15
YX Z^0.22
0.20.32
-0.028-0.3
0.0650.077
-0.15
YX Z_-0.19
-0.0091-0.041-0.36
0.009-0.026
-0.0320.12
YX Z`0.15
-0.15-0.32
-0.017-0.045
0.28-0.11
0.18
YX Za-0.036
-0.064-0.049-0.0027
0.18-0.17
-0.0170.018
YX Zb0.083
0.130.046
-0.160.2
0.210.12
-0.035YX [c
-0.13-0.16
-0.0660.24
0.0690.045
-0.14-0.06
YX [Z0.047
-0.0230.17
0.0440.13
0.120.073
-0.16
YX [[0.0037
-0.210.26
0.110.13
0.34-0.33
0.023
YX [\0.02
-0.0420.36
0.30.2
0.0047-0.42
-0.064
YX []0.1
0.0220.004
0.21-0.13
0.15-0.16
0.039
YX [^0.013
-0.190.39
-0.390.27
-0.20.24
0.18
YX [_
0.31-0.25
-0.1-0.33
-0.17-0.11
-0.4-0.13
YX [`
-0.11-0.085
0.280.24
-0.52-0.26
-0.120.015
YX [a
0.0710.0074
-0.10.12
0.29-0.37
-0.250.21
YX [b
-0.0250.19
-0.0950.27
0.045-0.41
0.140.06
YX\c
-0.00710.042
-0.069-0.16
0.140.23
-0.15-0.043
YX\ Z
0.047-0.091
-0.0960.11
-0.20.099
0.12-0.19
YX\ [
0.0410.46
0.029-0.14
-0.0490.13
-0.480.13
Table7.8:F
ullEIE
Sdataseteigensystemaccordingto
Freem
an039
to046
CHAPTER7 131
exf 0.004
0.00
40.
0028
0.00
280.
0006
0.00
060.
0000
170.
0000
17
h f i 0.04
0.04
0.00
35-0
.07
0.33
-0.0
077
0.36
-0.0
17
h f j -0.13
-0.1
4-0
.17
-0.1
30.
19-0
.18
-0.1
9-0
.010
h f k 0.16
-0.0
78-0
.28
0.01
10.
140.
33-0
.04
-0.3
5
h f l 0.11
0.12
-0.2
70.
18-0
.21
-0.0
260.
31-0
.45
h f m -0.12
-0.0
53-0
.32
0.17
0.12
-0.1
3-0
.14
0.14
h f n 0.15
-0.0
630.
380.
022
0.19
0.00
540.
0045
-0.2
3
h f o 0.12
-0.1
60.
250.
048
-0.0
99-0
.36
0.00
27-0
.033
h f p 0.16
0.02
5-0
.21
0.02
2-0
.43
0.01
7-0
.29
-0.2
0
h f q 0.057
-0.2
50.
26-0
.15
-0.0
75-0
.031
0.11
-0.1
4
h f ir -0.15
0.05
80.
033
0.06
90.
170.
26-0
.1-0
.13
h f ii -0.23
0.4
-0.1
4-0
.086
-0.1
-0.0
630.
08-0
.14
h f ij 0.099
-0.0
70.
110.
0004
60.
340.
11-0
.53
-0.2
1
h f ik 0.44
0.06
8-0
.12
-0.0
14-0
.11
-0.1
6-0
.24
0.17
h f il 0.042
0.14
0.08
2-0
.005
5-0
.052
0.25
0.19
0.18
h f im -0.11
-0.0
71-0
.17
0.08
30.
160.
110.
079
0.10
h f in 0.09
-0.0
35-0
.14
0.06
3-0
.11
0.05
50.
022
0.11
h f io -0.015
-0.0
230.
2-0
.035
-0.2
0.23
-0.0
0094
-0.0
95
h f ip -0.25
-0.1
1-0
.12
0.23
0.09
7-0
.24
0.03
4-0
.39
h f iq 0.014
0.44
-0.0
26-0
.21
0.28
-0.2
7-0
.011
0.02
9
h f jr 0.35
-0.0
58-0
.059
0.29
0.21
0.25
-0.0
690.
11
h f ji -0.42
-0.2
80.
077
0.14
-0.1
30.
21-0
.17
-0.0
64
h f jj 0.22
-0.2
3-0
.23
0.1
0.06
4-0
.002
30.
25-0
.099
h f jk -0.19
0.2
0.08
3-0
.16
0.12
0.11
0.00
54-0
.13
h f jl -0.081
0.01
8-0
.18
0.14
0.15
-0.0
73-0
.006
9-0
.003
0
h f jm 0.14
0.15
0.06
90.
110.
021
0.23
0.12
-0.1
7
h f jn 0.021
-0.1
30.
150.
098
-0.0
40.
023
0.15
0.22
h f jo 0.22
0.16
0.00
86-0
.25
-0.0
960.
11-0
.1-0
.19
h f jp -0.14
0.01
2-0
.10.
037
-0.1
50.
21-0
.093
0.29
h f jq 0.14
-0.2
10.
140.
210.
13-0
.092
0.16
0.02
8
h f kr 0.052
-0.2
1-0
.26
-0.5
4-0
.05
0.07
2-0
.015
-0.0
14
h f ki 0.058
0.24
0.05
50.
34-0
.094
0.18
-0.0
790.
036
h f kj 0.019
0.15
0.18
0.34
-0.0
21-0
.24
-0.1
4-0
.017
Tabl
e7.
9:F
ullE
IES
data
sete
igen
syst
emac
cord
ingt
oF
reem
an
s -w to
s .-
132 CHAPTER7
12
34
56
78
16.5
+6.5i
470+
340i24.+
4.i68.+
55.i19.+
26.i64.+
66.i40.+
14.i390
+220i
2340
+470i
29.+29.i
5.7+
1.6i18.+
25.i10.1
+5.9i
10.+18.i
7.0-
1.8i40
+150i
34.+
24.i1.6
+5.7i
0.30+
0.30i0.3+
1.9i0.25
+0.65i0.08
+1.5i
0.47+
0.32i0.1
+9.4i
455.+
68.i25.+
18.i1.9
+0.3i
5.9+
5.9i2.4
+1.9i
4.4+
5.4i2.8
+0.2i
25.+31.i
526.+
19.i5.9
+10.1i0.65
+0.25i1.9
+2.4i
0.67+
0.67i1.2
+2.3i
0.81+
0.34i9.+
13.i6
66.+64.i
18.+10.i
1.5+
0.08i5.4
+4.4i
2.3+
1.2i3.9
+3.9i
2.1-
0.3i21.+
25.i7
14.+40.i
-1.8+
7.0i0.32+
0.47i0.2+
2.8i0.34
+0.81i
-0.3+
2.1i0.40
+0.40i
-2.+15.i
8220
+390i
150+
40i9.4
+0.1i
31.+25.i
13.+9.i
25.+21.i
15.-2.i
120+
120i9
22.+90.i
24.+24.i
1.9+
0.8i4.3
+7.7i
1.9+
2.8i3.2
+6.7i
3.0+
1.0i15.+
36.i10
39.+50.i
37.+36.i
2.6+
0.7i7.0
+7.9i
2.3+
2.9i5.6
+8.1i
3.9+
1.4i34.+
38.i11
200+
170i54.+
58.i5.1
+1.2i
16.+17.i
6.3+
4.7i11.+
16.i6.7
+1.0i
68.+95.i
12-7.+
24.i28.+
26.i1.6
+0.6i
3.6+
5.2i1.1
+2.3i
3.3+
5.4i2.7
+1.3i
20.+22.i
133.+
21.i3.+
15.i0.54
+0.61i0.5
+3.2i
0.14+
1.13i0.1
+3.0i
0.77+
0.98i2.+
16.i14
4.+40.i
17.+19.i
1.24+
0.59i2.6+
4.8i1.0
+1.9i
2.1+
4.5i2.0
+0.9i
12.+22.i
15100.+
70.i14.+
16.i1.7
+0.3i
6.3+
5.7i2.5
+1.2i
3.9+
5.0i2.0
-0.1i
25.+35.i
1649.+
67.i22.+
32.i2.0
+0.9i
5.1+
7.9i1.9
+2.6i
3.4+
7.4i2.9
+1.3i
22.+41.i
1765.+
74.i12.+
19.i1.5
+0.6i
4.3+
6.2i1.9
+1.7i
2.5+
5.3i1.9
+0.5i
15.+35.i
1861.+
75.i4.0
+8.1i
0.99+
0.38i3.1+
4.6i1.6
+1.1i
1.5+
3.4i1.15
-0.08i
8.+27.i
199.+
36.i3.4
+7.4i
0.48+
0.37i0.8+
2.7i0.49
+0.90i
0.4+
2.1i0.74
+0.37i1.2
+13.3i
20-1.+
27.i2.6
+7.1i
0.35+
0.37i0.3+
2.2i0.23
+0.81i0.08
+1.8i
0.59+
0.45i-0.3+
10.4i21
5.+16.i
6.+15.i
0.60+
0.53i0.9+
3.0i0.24
+1.07i
0.5+
2.9i0.87
+0.89i
5.+15.i
226.+
41.i17.+
35.i1.5
+1.2i
2.5+
7.2i0.7
+2.7i
1.7+
7.0i2.3
+2.0i
13.+34.i
233.+
27.i8.2
+9.6i
0.64+
0.34i1.3+
2.7i0.54
+1.01i
1.0+
2.4i1.04
+0.47i4.9
+12.3i
2472.+
120.i82.+55.i
5.1+
0.8i15.+
14.i5.4
+5.4i
12.+14.i
8.1+
1.4i69.+
66.i25
33.+38.i
-0.2+
4.6i0.44+
0.23i1.4+
2.3i0.73
+0.49i
0.5+
1.7i0.44
+0.01i
3.+14.i
2631.+
79.i2.1
+2.5i
0.66+
0.35i1.6+
3.8i1.2
+1.1i
0.7+
2.5i0.94
-0.17i
0.2+
20.i27
43.+93.i
32.+27.i
2.4+
0.7i6.3
+8.3i
2.6+
2.9i4.9
+7.5i
3.7+
0.8i26.+
41.i28
8.+22.i
1.3+
5.1i0.29
+0.26i0.5
+1.7i
0.28+
0.54i0.15+
1.40i0.41+
0.26i0.7
+9.0i
29570
+390i
53.+51.i
7.9+
0.4i32.+
25.i14.+
4.i19.+
21.i8.4
-3.0i
120+
170i30
69.+70.i
28.+49.i
2.7+
1.4i6.8
+10.6i
2.2+
3.5i4.4
+10.4i
3.7+
2.2i32.+
56.i31
80+
200i104.+
88.i7.0
+2.1i
18.+23.i
6.7+
8.7i15.+
22.i11.1
+3.2i
82.+106.i
32260
+170i88.+
100.i7.5
+1.8i
24.+23.i
8.2+
6.9i17.+
23.i9.9
+2.6i
110+
130i
Table7.10:Part1
ofpartialsumy3z 4
ofthefirsttw
ow
eightedprojectorsofthefull
EIE
Sdataset
CHAPTER7 133
910
1112
1314
1516
190
.+22
.i50
.+39
.i17
0+
200i
24.-
7.i
21.+
3.i
40.+
4.i
70.+
100.
i67.
+49
.i2
24.+
24.i
36.+
37.i
58.+
54.i
26.+
28.i
15.+
3.i
19.+
17.i
16.+
14.i
32.+
22.i
30.
8+
1.9i
0.7
+2.
6i1.
2+
5.1i
0.6
+1.
6i0.
61+
0.54
i0.5
9+
1.24
i0.
3+
1.7i
0.9
+2.
0i4
7.7
+4.
3i7.
9+
7.0i
17.+
16.i
5.2
+3.
6i3.
2+
0.5i
4.8
+2.
6i5.
7+
6.3i
7.9
+5.
1i5
2.8
+1.
9i2.
9+
2.3i
4.7
+6.
3i2.
3+
1.1i
1.13
+0.
14i
1.9
+1.
0i1.
2+
2.5i
2.6
+1.
9i6
6.7
+3.
2i8.
1+
5.6i
16.+
11.i
5.4
+3.
3i3.
0+
0.1i
4.5
+2.
1i5.
0+
3.9i
7.4
+3.
4i7
1.0
+3.
0i1.
4+
3.9i
1.0
+6.
7i1.
3+
2.7i
0.98
+0.
77i
0.9
+2.
0i-0
.1+
2.0i
1.3
+2.
9i8
36.+
15.i
38.+
34.i
95.+
68.i
22.+
20.i
16.+
2.i
22.+
12.i
35.+
25.i
41.+
22.i
96.
3+
6.3i
5.3
+9.
8i13
.+22
.i3.
4+
5.4i
3.0
+1.
7i3.
7+
4.1i
4.6
+8.
1i6.
4+
7.8i
109.
8+
5.3i
7.7
+7.
7i18
.+24
.i5.
0+
2.6i
3.3
+0.
8i5.
4+
2.6i
6.3
+10
.5i8
.5+
7.1i
1122
.+13
.i24
.+18
.i44
.+44
.i17
.+10
.i9.
3+
0.8i
15.+
7.i
13.+
17.i
22.+
13.i
125.
4+
3.4i
2.6
+5.
0i10
.+17
.i1.
3+
1.3i
1.6
+1.
0i2.
5+
1.6i
3.8
+7.
8i4.
1+
5.2i
131.
7+
3.0i
0.8
+3.
3i0.
8+
9.3i
1.0
+1.
6i0.
76+
0.76
i1.
0+
1.6i
-0.1
+3.
7i1.
1+
3.2i
144.
1+
3.7i
2.6
+5.
4i7.
+15
.i1.
6+
2.5i
1.6
+1.
0i2.
1+
2.1i
2.7
+5.
9i3.
6+
4.8i
158.
1+
4.6i
10.5
+6.
3i17
.+13
.i7.
8+
3.8i
3.7
-0.
1i5.
9+
2.7i
4.7
+4.
7i8.
8+
4.0i
167.
8+
6.4i
7.1
+8.
5i13
.+22
.i5.
2+
4.1i
3.2
+1.
1i4.
8+
3.6i
4.0
+8.
8i7.
1+
7.1i
176.
2+
5.4i
7.3
+7.
4i12
.+15
.i5.
5+
4.4i
3.1
+0.
7i4.
4+
3.3i
3.2
+5.
5i6.
6+
5.3i
184.
2+
4.4i
6.2
+6.
4i9.
2+
10.1
i4.7
+4.
5i2.
6+
0.6i
3.4
+3.
0i2.
3+
2.9i
5.3
+3.
9i19
1.5
+2.
6i1.
5+
3.6i
2.6
+7.
1i1.
1+
2.3i
0.98
+0.
70i
1.0
+1.
7i0.
7+
2.4i
1.7
+2.
8i20
0.9
+2.
2i0.
5+
3.0i
1.1
+6.
2i0.
4+
1.8i
0.62
+0.
69i
0.5
+1.
4i0.
3+
2.2i
0.9
+2.
5i21
2.0
+2.
6i1.
1+
2.9i
1.8
+8.
8i1.
1+
1.2i
0.78
+0.
61i
1.2
+1.
3i0.
4+
3.7i
1.4
+2.
9i22
5.1
+6.
1i2.
7+
7.1i
6.+
22.i
2.3
+2.
9i1.
9+
1.5i
2.7
+3.
1i1.
5+
9.0i
3.6
+7.
1i23
2.0
+2.
2i1.
4+
3.2i
3.7
+7.
9i0.
9+
1.7i
0.92
+0.
62i
1.1
+1.
4i1.
3+
3.0i
1.9
+2.
8i24
19.+
9.i
16.+
15.i
41.+
44.i
9.3
+5.
9i6.
8+
1.5i
10.5
+4.
8i15
.+18
.i18
.+13
.i25
2.0
+2.
4i3.
1+
3.2i
3.9
+4.
9i2.
5+
2.3i
1.31
+0.
29i
1.7
+1.
6i0.
8+
1.3i
2.5
+2.
0i26
2.3
+3.
9i3.
7+
6.4i
6.1
+8.
5i2.
6+
4.9i
2.0
+1.
0i1.
9+
3.1i
1.8
+2.
0i3.
6+
3.9i
278.
7+
6.4i
8.0
+10
.1i1
8.+
24.i
5.1
+5.
3i3.
8+
1.3i
5.2
+4.
0i6.
4+
9.1i
8.7
+8.
0i28
0.9
+1.
7i1.
0+
2.3i
1.4
+4.
5i0.
8+
1.5i
0.63
+0.
42i0
.71
+1.
10i
0.3
+1.
5i1.
1+
1.7i
2940
.+21
.i57
.+30
.i88
.+51
.i42
.+21
.i19
.-2.
i30
.+13
.i24
.+16
.i46
.+16
.i30
10.7
+8.
6i9.
3+
10.3
i16.
+30
.i7.
2+
4.4i
4.1
+1.
3i6.
6+
4.3i
4.5
+12
.5i9
.2+
9.3i
3125
.+16
.i20
.+25
.i51
.+69
.i12
.+11
.i9.
5+
3.6i
14.+
9.i
18.+
28.i
23.+
22.i
3232
.+16
.i33
.+22
.i60
.+64
.i24
.+9.
i12
.0+
0.5i
20.+
8.i
18.+
27.i
30.+
18.i
Tabl
e7.
11:P
art2
ofpa
rtia
lsum
{ ),+- ofthe
first
two
wei
ghte
dpro
ject
orso
fthe
full
EIE
Sda
tase
t
134 CHAPTER7
1718
1920
2122
2324
174.+
65.i75.+
61.i36.+
9.i27.-
1.i16.+
5.i41.+
6.i27.+
3.i120.+
72.i2
19.+12.i
8.1+
4.0i7.4
+3.4i
7.1+
2.6i15.+
6.i35.+
17.i9.6
+8.2i
55.+82.i
30.6
+1.5i0.38
+0.99i0.37
+0.48i0.37
+0.35i0.53
+0.60i1.2
+1.5i0.34
+0.64i
0.8+
5.1i4
6.2+
4.3i4.6
+3.1i
2.7+
0.8i2.2
+0.3i
3.0+
0.9i7.2
+2.5i
2.7+
1.3i14.+
15.i5
1.7+
1.9i1.1
+1.6i
0.90+
0.49i0.81+
0.23i1.07+
0.24i2.7+
0.7i1.01+
0.54i5.4
+5.4i
65.3
+2.5i
3.4+
1.5i2.1
+0.4i
1.8+
0.08i2.9
+0.5i
7.0+
1.7i2.4
+1.0i
14.+12.i
70.5
+1.9i-0.08
+1.15i0.37
+0.74i0.45
+0.59i0.89
+0.87i2.0
+2.3i0.47
+1.04i
1.4+
8.1i8
35.+15.i
27.+8.i
13.3+
1.2i10.4
-0.3i
15.+5.i
34.+13.i
12.3+
4.9i66.+
69.i9
5.4+
6.2i4.4
+4.2i
2.6+
1.5i2.2
+0.9i
2.6+
2.0i6.1
+5.1i
2.2+
2.0i9.+
19.i10
7.4+
7.3i6.4
+6.2i
3.6+
1.5i3.0
+0.5i
2.9+
1.1i7.1
+2.7i
3.2+
1.4i15.+
16.i11
15.+12.i
10.1+
9.2i7.1
+2.6i
6.2+
1.1i8.8
+1.8i
22.+6.i
7.9+
3.7i44.+
41.i12
4.4+
5.5i4.5
+4.7i
2.3+
1.1i1.8
+0.4i
1.2+
1.1i2.9
+2.3i
1.7+
0.9i5.9
+9.3i
130.7
+3.1i
0.6+
2.6i0.70
+0.98i0.69
+0.62i0.61
+0.78i1.5
+1.9i0.62
+0.92i
1.5+
6.8i14
3.3+
4.4i3.0
+3.4i
1.7+
1.0i1.4
+0.5i
1.3+
1.2i3.1
+2.7i
1.4+
1.1i4.8
+10.5i
155.5
+3.2i
2.9+
2.3i2.4
+0.7i
2.2+
0.3i3.7
+0.4i
9.0+
1.5i3.0
+1.3i
18.+15.i
165.3
+6.6i
3.9+
5.3i2.8
+1.7i
2.5+
0.9i2.9
+1.4i
7.1+
3.6i2.8
+1.9i
13.+18.i
174.2
+4.2i
2.3+
3.0i2.0
+1.2i
1.9+
0.7i2.9
+1.0i
7.0+
3.0i2.3
+1.7i
12.+16.i
183.0
+2.3i
1.2+
1.2i1.3
+0.8i
1.27+
0.55i2.6
+0.9i
6.1+
2.8i1.7
+1.5i
10.+14.i
191.2
+2.0i
0.8+
1.3i0.62
+0.62i0.58
+0.44i0.86
+0.82i2.0
+2.1i0.58
+0.87i
1.9+
7.3i20
0.7+
1.9i0.55+
1.27i0.44+
0.58i0.42+
0.42i0.50+
0.75i1.1+
1.9i0.33+
0.73i0.4
+5.7i
211.0
+2.9i
0.9+
2.6i0.82
+0.86i0.75
+0.50i0.63
+0.63i1.6
+1.5i0.72
+0.77i
2.2+
6.0i22
3.0+
7.0i2.8
+6.1i
2.1+
2.0i1.9
+1.1i
1.5+
1.6i3.7
+3.7i
1.7+
1.8i5.+
14.i23
1.7+
2.3i1.5
+1.7i
0.87+
0.58i0.73+
0.33i0.77+
0.72i1.8+
1.7i0.70+
0.70i2.4
+6.3i
2416.+
12.i14.+
10.i7.3
+1.9i
5.7+
0.4i6.0
+2.2i
14.+5.i
6.3+
2.4i30.+
30.i25
1.2+
1.2i0.23+
0.62i0.56+
0.44i0.60+
0.33i1.30+
0.45i3.1+
1.4i0.84+
0.79i4.8
+7.2i
262.2
+1.8i0.89
+0.38i0.81
+0.62i0.81
+0.57i
1.9+
1.3i4.2
+3.6i
1.0+
1.4i4.5
+13.1i
277.3
+6.6i
5.8+
4.7i3.3
+1.4i
2.7+
0.7i3.4
+1.8i
8.0+
4.6i3.0
+2.0i
14.+21.i
280.6
+1.3i0.32
+0.86i0.36
+0.43i0.37
+0.30i0.57
+0.49i1.3
+1.3i0.38
+0.57i
1.4+
4.7i29
27.+10.i
11.9+
6.0i11.0
+2.3i
10.2+
0.9i20.+
0.8i48.+
6.i15.+
6.i98.+
76.i30
6.6+
9.3i4.9
+8.1i
3.8+
2.5i3.4
+1.2i
3.7+
1.6i9.2
+4.0i
3.8+
2.4i18.+
23.i31
21.+20.i
18.+16.i
9.8+
4.0i7.9
+1.6i
8.2+
4.6i19.+
11.i8.3
+4.7i
37.+50.i
3222.+
18.i15.+
16.i10.6
+3.9i
9.1+
1.2i11.3
+1.6i
28.+5.i
11.3+
4.3i62.+
50.i
Table7.12:Part3
ofpartialsumy3z 4
ofthefirsttw
ow
eightedprojectorsofthefull
EIE
Sdataset
CHAPTER7 135
2526
2728
2930
3132
138
.+33
.i79
.+31
.i93
.+43
.i22
.+8.
i39
0+
570i
70.+
69.i
200
+80
i17
0+
260i
24.
6-
0.2i
2.5
+2.
1i27
.+32
.i5.
1+
1.3i
51.+
53.i
49.+
28.i
88.+
104.
i100
.+88
.i3
0.23
+0.
44i
0.35
+0.
66i
0.7
+2.
4i0.
26+
0.29
i0.4
+7.
9i1.
4+
2.7i
2.1
+7.
0i1.
8+
7.5i
42.
3+
1.4i
3.8
+1.
6i8.
3+
6.3i
1.7
+0.
5i25
.+32
.i10
.6+
6.8i
23.+
18.i
23.+
24.i
50.
49+
0.73
i1.
1+
1.2i
2.9
+2.
6i0.
54+
0.28
i4.
+14
.i3.
5+
2.2i
8.7
+6.
7i6.
9+
8.2i
61.
7+
0.5i
2.5
+0.
7i7.
5+
4.9i
1.40
+0.
15i2
1.+
19.i
10.4
+4.
4i22
.+15
.i23
.+17
.i7
0.01
+0.
44i
-0.1
7+
0.94
i0.
8+
3.7i
0.26
+0.
41i-
3.0
+8.
4i2.
2+
3.7i
3.2
+11
.1i
2.6
+9.
9i8
14.+
3.i
20.-
0.2i
41.+
26.i
9.0
+0.
7i17
0+
120i
56.+
32.i
106.
+82
.i13
0+
110i
92.
4+
2.0i
3.9
+2.
3i6.
4+
8.7i
1.7
+0.
9i21
.+40
.i8.
6+
10.7
i16.
+25
.i16
.+32
.i10
3.2
+3.
1i6.
4+
3.7i
10.1
+8.
0i2.
3+
1.0i
30.+
57.i
10.3
+9.
3i25
.+20
.i22
.+33
.i11
4.9
+3.
9i8.
5+
6.1i
24.+
18.i
4.5
+1.
4i51
.+88
.i30
.+16
.i69
.+51
.i64
.+60
.i12
2.3
+2.
5i4.
9+
2.6i
5.3
+5.
1i1.
5+
0.8i
21.+
42.i
4.4
+7.
2i11
.+12
.i9.
+24
.i13
0.29
+1.
31i
1.0
+2.
0i1.
3+
3.8i
0.42
+0.
63i
-2.+
19.i
1.3
+4.
1i3.
6+
9.5i
0.5
+12
.0i
141.
6+
1.7i
3.1
+1.
9i4.
0+
5.2i
1.10
+0.
71i1
3.+
30.i
4.3
+6.
6i9.
+14
.i8.
+20
.i15
1.3
+0.
8i2.
0+
1.8i
9.1
+6.
4i1.
5+
0.3i
16.+
24.i
12.5
+4.
5i28
.+18
.i27
.+18
.i16
2.0
+2.
5i3.
9+
3.6i
8.0
+8.
7i1.
7+
1.1i
16.+
46.i
9.3
+9.
2i22
.+23
.i18
.+30
.i17
1.2
+1.
2i1.
8+
2.2i
6.6
+7.
3i1.
3+
0.6i
10.+
27.i
9.3
+6.
6i20
.+21
.i18
.+22
.i18
0.62
+0.
23i
0.38
+0.
89i
4.7
+5.
8i0.
86+
0.32
i6.0
+11
.9i8
.1+
4.9i
16.+
18.i
16.+
15.i
190.
44+
0.56
i0.
62+
0.81
i1.
4+
3.3i
0.43
+0.
36i2
.3+
11.0
i2.5
+3.
8i4.
0+
9.8i
3.9
+10
.6i
200.
33+
0.60
i0.
57+
0.81
i0.
7+
2.7i
0.30
+0.
37i0
.9+
10.2
i1.2
+3.
4i1.
6+
7.9i
1.2
+9.
1i21
0.45
+1.
30i
1.3
+1.
9i1.
8+
3.4i
0.49
+0.
57i0
.8+
20.i
1.6
+3.
7i4.
6+
8.2i
1.6
+11
.3i
221.
4+
3.1i
3.6
+4.
2i4.
6+
8.0i
1.3
+1.
3i6.
+48
.i4.
0+
9.2i
11.+
19.i
5.+
28.i
230.
79+
0.84
i1.
4+
1.0i
2.0
+3.
0i0.
57+
0.38
i6.
+15
.i2.
4+
3.8i
4.7
+8.
3i4.
3+
11.3
i24
7.2
+4.
8i13
.1+
4.5i
21.+
14.i
4.7
+1.
4i76
.+98
.i23
.+18
.i50
.+37
.i50
.+62
.i25
0.12
+0.
12i
-0.1
1+
0.59
i2.
2+
3.0i
0.37
+0.
19i0
.6+
5.5i
3.9
+2.
3i7.
7+
9.4i
7.5
+7.
4i26
0.59
-0.
11i0
.029
+0.
029i
2.4
+5.
1i0.
62+
0.27
i5.3
+5.
9i5.
8+
5.4i
8.+
17.i
11.+
15.i
273.
0+
2.2i
5.1
+2.
4i9.
1+
9.1i
2.2
+0.
9i29
.+46
.i12
.+11
.i24
.+26
.i24
.+35
.i28
0.19
+0.
37i
0.27
+0.
62i
0.9
+2.
2i0.
24+
0.24
i0.4
+6.
9i1.
6+
2.3i
2.8
+6.
3i2.
4+
6.5i
295.
5+
0.6i
5.9
+5.
3i46
.+29
.i6.
9+
0.4i
75.+
75.i
67.+
17.i
150
+90
i15
0+
70i
302.
3+
3.9i
5.4
+5.
8i11
.+12
.i2.
3+
1.6i
17.+
67.i
12.+
12.i
30.+
29.i
21.+
39.i
319.
4+
7.7i
17.+
8.i
26.+
24.i
6.3
+2.
8i90
+15
0i29
.+30
.i63
.+63
.i60
.+98
.i32
7.4
+7.
5i15
.+11
.i35
.+24
.i6.
5+
2.4i
70+
150i
39.+
21.i
98.+
60.i
83.+
83.i
Tabl
e7.
13:P
art4
ofpa
rtia
lsum
{ ),+- ofthe
first
two
wei
ghte
dpro
ject
orso
fthe
full
EIE
Sda
tase
t
136 CHAPTER7
12
34
56
78
1-2.2
-2.2i
21.+29.i
2.5-
1.1i-0.6
-2.5i
1.5+
0.8i0.6
+2.4i
3.1-
0.4i-40.+
16.i2
29.+21.i
-22.-22.i
6.8+
0.6i-2.1
+3.2i
1.7-
0.3i-7.0
-0.9i
14.-0.7i
-24.-70.i
3-1.1
+2.5i
0.6+
6.8i0.53
+0.53i
-0.29-
0.54i0.40
+0.19i-0.84
+0.01i
0.9+
1.2i4.9
-3.5i
4-2.5
-0.6i
3.2-
2.1i-0.54
-0.29i
0.21+
0.21i-0.63
-0.26i-0.20
-0.35i-0.72
-0.54i
9.8+
9.1i5
0.8+
1.5i-0.3
+1.7i
0.19+
0.40i-0.26
-0.63i
0.64+
0.64i0.48
+0.74i-0.02
+0.86i-4.5
-10.1i
62.4
+0.6i
-0.9-
7.0i0.01
-0.84i
-0.35-
0.20i0.74
+0.48i
0.29+
0.29i0.11
-1.37i
-3.9+
8.4i7
-0.4+
3.1i-0.7
+14.i
1.2+
0.9i-0.54
-0.72i
0.86-
0.02i-1.37
+0.11i
1.9+
1.9i2.1
-8.3i
816.-
40.i-70.-
24.i-3.5
+4.9i
9.1+
9.8i-10.1
-4.5i
8.4-
3.9i-8.3
+2.1i
-120-
120i9
5.2-
3.5i5.1
+12.5i
1.30+
0.18i-0.2
+2.5i
-1.1-
3.3i-0.81
+0.17i
3.0-
0.3i-10.-
24.i10
5.2+
1.0i-18.-
15.i-0.22
+0.76i
0.79-
0.44i0.5
+2.2i
1.32+
0.19i-1.11+
0.71i-21.-20.i
11-16.+
14.i-9.-
30.i-2.1
+0.7i
-0.18+
0.54i-1.6
+0.04i
-6.4-
8.1i-0.4
+1.4i
106.+70.i
124.2
+1.6i
-23.-17.i
-0.06+
0.41i1.03
-0.69i
0.6+
2.7i0.25
-0.86i
-0.67+
0.16i-17.-
3.i13
1.7+
3.9i-2.8
-1.0i
0.93+
0.62i0.02
-0.30i
0.14+
0.82i-0.82
-0.03i
1.6+
1.0i-4.6
-12.6i
146.0
+5.5i
-18.-10.i
0.88+
0.80i0.47
-0.93i
0.9+
2.7i-0.72
+0.41i1.02
+0.86i
-14.-22.i
1514.+
7.i-21.-
10.i2.3
+0.2i
-0.11-
0.47i1.9
+2.5i
-1.7+
1.4i3.8
-0.5i
-27.-33.i
162.1
+5.4i
-7.0+
5.4i1.4
+0.7i
-0.41-
1.31i1.4
+1.5i
-1.5+
0.3i2.1
+1.4i
-3.8-
8.2i17
-4.7+
1.8i1.22
-0.08i-0.22
+0.23i-0.26
+0.05i
-0.19-
0.52i-1.1
-2.0i
0.24+
0.77i19.+
20.i18
0.7+
3.3i-0.6
+4.5i
1.4+
0.4i-0.48
+0.43i
0.15-
0.72i-1.9
-1.5i
3.1+
0.9i1.5
+1.9i
19-2.6
+2.3i
-0.2-
5.4i-0.24
+0.16i0.047
-0.129i-0.25
+0.35i-0.56
-1.14i-0.10
+0.39i
11.+9.i
200.4
+2.1i
-2.7+
1.9i0.40
+0.34i
0.03-
0.58i0.35
+0.75i-0.55
+0.27i0.49
+0.62i
-0.6-
5.3i21
2.6+
3.1i-5.9
-4.3i
0.50+
0.48i0.26
-0.39i
0.19+
1.23i-0.36+
0.44i0.63+
0.54i-6.-
15.i22
5.2+
3.2i-13.-
22.i-1.10
+0.14i
1.0-
1.7i0.6
+4.2i
2.0+
2.8i-3.2
-0.5i
-14.-29.i
231.7
+2.5i
-4.8+
0.2i0.51
+0.29i
-0.03-
0.72i0.68
+1.08i-0.39
+0.45i0.59
+0.52i
-4.6-
7.0i24
14.+8.i
-64.-54.i
-0.52+
0.62i2.2
-1.9i
2.3+
7.5i0.05
-1.5i
-2.0-
0.6i-31.-
11.i25
0.04+
2.6i0.4
+9.7i
0.51+
0.94i-0.87
-0.90i
1.32+
0.19i0.25
+0.58i
0.6+
2.2i-0.5
-12.7i
262.7
+4.2i
-0.9+
5.1i1.18
+0.18i
-0.42-
0.57i0.77
+0.59i
-1.4+
0.9i2.0
+0.3i
-0.3-
11.4i27
4.1+
0.6i0.8
-13.0i
0.30-
0.54i0.19
+1.26i
-0.84-
0.32i0.004-0.24i
1.1-
1.5i-7.3
-6.1i
280.1
+1.4i
2.9+
11.0i0.92
+0.39i
-0.39-
0.37i0.44
-0.23i
-0.73+
0.47i1.5
+0.9i
-1.9-
7.2i29
-10.9+
5.2i80.+
42.i-3.0
-1.3i
-7.1-
6.4i7.0
-0.1i
9.+12.i
-7.4+
2.4i38.-
23.i30
-31.-5.i
-4.-30.i
-6.3-
1.3i1.24
+0.19i
-2.7-
1.1i-1.4
-10.6i
-8.6-
1.0i100
+150i
31-5.4
-5.0i
29.+64.i
2.4+
1.2i-1.8
-1.3i
1.4-
3.2i0.5
+3.1i
3.0+
4.0i-18.-
20.i32
-28.+13.i
3.-65.i
-5.1-
2.8i0.8
+1.8i
-4.4-
0.4i-8.-
13.i-3.5
-4.5i
160+
170i
Table7.14:Part1
ofthepartialsumy5z 8
ofthefirsttw
ow
eightedprojectorsofthefull
EIE
Sdataset
CHAPTER7 137
910
1112
1314
1516
1-3
.5+
5.2i
1.0
+5.
2i14
.-16
.i1.
6+
4.2i
3.9
+1.
7i5.
5+
6.0i
7.+
14.i
5.4
+2.
1i2
12.5
+5.
1i-1
5.-
18.i
-30.
-9.
i-1
7.-
23.i
-1.0
-2.
8i-1
0.-
18.i
-10.
-21
.i5.
4-
7.0i
30.
18+
1.30
i0.
76-
0.22
i0.
7-
2.1i
0.41
-0.
06i
0.62
+0.
93i
0.80
+0.
88i
0.2
+2.
3i0.
7+
1.4i
42.
5-
0.2i
-0.4
4+
0.79
i0.
54-
0.18
i-0
.69
+1.
03i
-0.3
0+
0.02
i-0
.93
+0.
47i-
0.47
-0.
11i-
1.31
-0.
41i
5-3
.3-
1.1i
2.2
+0.
5i0.
04-
1.6i
2.7
+0.
6i0.
82+
0.14
i2.
7+
0.9i
2.5
+1.
9i1.
5+
1.4i
60.
17-
0.81
i0.
19+
1.32
i-8
.1-
6.4i
-0.8
6+
0.25
i-0
.03
-0.
82i
0.41
-0.
72i
1.4
-1.
7i0.
3-
1.5i
7-0
.3+
3.0i
0.71
-1.
11i
1.4
-0.
4i0.
16-
0.67
i1.
0+
1.6i
0.86
+1.
02i
-0.5
+3.
8i1.
4+
2.1i
8-2
4.-
10.i
-20.
-21
.i70
.+10
6.i
-3.-
17.i
-12.
6-
4.6i
-22.
-14
.i-3
3.-
27.i
-8.2
-3.
8i9
3.8
+3.
8i-4
.9-
7.6i
8.+
22.i
-3.3
-4.
7i0.
07-
0.31
i-4
.0-
4.1i
-4.0
-2.
6i0.
8-
1.4i
10-7
.6-
4.9i
0.46
+0.
46i
-2.8
-3.
3i1.
5-
1.6i
-1.2
-1.
0i0.
71-
1.02
i-1
.0-
3.8i
0.57
+0.
41i
1122
.+8.
i-3
.3-
2.8i
-25.
-25
.i-1
0.6
-6.
5i-4
.9+
0.9i
-9.9
-6.
3i-1
0.-
15.i
-9.6
-4.
6i12
-4.7
-3.
3i-1
.6+
1.5i
-6.5
-10
.6i
-2.2
-2.
2i-2
.2-
0.6i
-1.8
-1.
3i-4
.0-
5.0i
-0.7
9-
0.81
i13
-0.3
1+
0.07
i-1
.0-
1.2i
0.9
-4.
9i-0
.6-
2.2i
0.22
+0.
22i
0.03
-0.
66i
-0.5
1-
0.38
i1.1
5+
0.64
i14
-4.1
-4.
0i-1
.02
+0.
71i
-6.3
-9.
9i-1
.3-
1.8i
-0.6
6+
0.03
i-0
.28
-0.
28i
-2.4
-1.
8i0.
93+
0.97
i15
-2.6
-4.
0i-3
.8-
1.0i
-15.
-10
.i-5
.0-
4.0i
-0.3
8-
0.51
i-1
.8-
2.4i
-3.8
-3.
8i2.
4-
0.6i
16-1
.4+
0.8i
0.41
+0.
57i
-4.6
-9.
6i-0
.81
-0.
79i
0.64
+1.
15i
0.97
+0.
93i
-0.6
+2.
4i1.
6+
1.6i
174.
3+
4.4i
-0.2
2-
1.32
i-2
.1-
4.1i
-1.6
-1.
9i-0
.72
+0.
41i
-1.5
-1.
5i-1
.4-
2.1i
-1.4
-1.
0i18
4.1
+5.
8i-2
.9-
4.3i
-0.7
-2.
5i-3
.7-
5.2i
-0.2
9+
0.33
i-2
.5-
3.4i
-2.7
-2.
9i0.
6-
1.3i
192.
2+
1.1i
-0.1
5-
0.14
i-1
.7-
6.0i
-0.7
3-
1.08
i-0
.53
-0.
01i
-0.6
2-
0.79
i-0
.4-
1.8i
-0.8
6-
0.51
i20
-0.7
8-
0.61
i0.
19+
0.74
i-0
.4-
3.5i
-0.0
4+
0.33
i0.
27+
0.59
i0.
42+
1.04
i-0
.3+
1.6i
0.43
+1.
08i
21-1
.7-
2.4i
-0.4
9+
0.13
i-0
.8-
4.2i
-0.1
3-
0.79
i0.0
06+
0.03
6i0.
23+
0.14
i-0
.56
-0.
26i0
.74
+0.
85i
22-1
0.-
14.i
3.7
+7.
0i-6
.1-
11.0
i4.
9+
5.3i
0.20
-0.
92i
4.5
+4.
4i3.
6+
1.7i
0.7
+2.
9i23
-1.8
-1.
1i0.
39+
0.96
i-2
.3-
5.1i
0.04
+0.
16i
0.27
+0.
40i
0.78
+0.
84i-
0.03
+1.
21i0
.80
+0.
97i
24-1
1.-
12.i
-3.2
+5.
2i-3
1.-
31.i
-6.3
-4.
4i-5
.8-
2.1i
-4.6
-3.
6i-1
0.-
15.i
-2.7
-2.
5i25
-4.2
+1.
3i4.
1-
0.8i
-0.3
6+
0.47
i4.
2-
0.06
i1.
4+
0.7i
4.1
+0.
8i3.
5+
3.2i
2.4
+2.
4i26
0.87
-0.
38i
-0.4
8+
0.15
i-3
.5-
4.3i
-1.2
6+
0.02
i0.
94+
0.78
i0.
33+
0.90
i-0
.2+
2.4i
1.3
+1.
1i27
2.7
-0.
9i-3
.4-
2.7i
-1.5
+0.
01i
-2.7
-3.
5i-0
.7-
1.7i
-2.3
-3.
7i-0
.9-
5.9i
0.04
-2.
7i28
-0.1
+1.
8i0.
26-
0.73
i2.
8+
0.7i
0.30
-0.
12i
1.03
+0.
92i
0.87
+0.
91i
0.4
+3.
3i1.
4+
1.3i
29-2
2.-
12.i
41.+
16.i
-10.
7-
2.9i
43.+
28.i
16.+
0.7i
42.+
20.i
53.+
37.i
14.+
15.i
3018
.+12
.i0.
4+
5.2i
-14.
-22
.i-7
.0+
1.1i
-7.3
+0.
2i-9
.5-
2.8i
-8.-
13.i
-15.
-7.
i31
-5.9
+9.
4i6.
1-
1.7i
27.+
20.i
8.8
+4.
4i5.
9+
3.9i
8.4
+6.
9i8.
+20
.i6.
6+
7.0i
3242
.+10
.i-9
.3+
2.4i
-39.
-48
.i-2
1.-
5.i
-8.7
-1.
0i-1
9.-
9.i
-14.
-25
.i-1
8.-
13.i
Tabl
e7.
15:P
art2
ofth
epa
rtia
lsum
{ .,+v ofthe
first
two
wei
ghte
dpro
ject
orso
fthe
full
EIE
Sda
tase
t
138 CHAPTER7
1718
1920
2122
2324
11.8
-4.7i
3.3+
0.7i2.3
-2.6i
2.1+
0.4i3.1
+2.6i
3.2+
5.2i2.5
+1.7i
8.+14.i
2-0.08
+1.22i
4.5-
0.6i-5.4
-0.2i
1.9-
2.7i-4.3
-5.9i
-22.-13.i
0.2-
4.8i-54.-
64.i3
0.23-
0.22i0.4
+1.4i
0.16-
0.24i0.34
+0.40i
0.48+
0.50i0.14
-1.10i
0.29+
0.51i0.62
-0.52i
40.05
-0.26i
0.43-
0.48i-0.129
+0.047i-0.58
+0.03i
-0.39+
0.26i-1.7
+1.0i
-0.72-
0.03i-1.9
+2.2
5-0.52
-0.19i-0.72
+0.15i
0.35-
0.25i0.75
+0.35i
1.23+
0.19i4.2
+0.6i
1.08+
0.68i7.5
+2.3i
6-2.0
-1.1i
-1.5-
1.9i-1.14
-0.56i
0.27-
0.55i0.44
-0.36i
2.8+
2.0i0.45
-0.39i
-1.5+
0.05i7
0.77+
0.24i0.9
+3.1i
0.39-
0.10i0.62
+0.49i
0.54+
0.63i-0.5
-3.2i
0.52+
0.59i-0.6
-2.0i
820.+
19.i1.9
+1.5i
9.+11.i
-5.3-
0.6i-15.-
6.i-29.-
14.i-7.0
-4.6i
-11.-31.i
94.4
+4.3i
5.8+
4.1i1.1
+2.2i
-0.61-
0.78i-2.4
-1.7i
-14.-10.i
-1.1-
1.8i-12.-
11.i10
-1.32-
0.22i-4.3
-2.9i
-0.14-
0.15i0.74
+0.19i
0.13-
0.49i7.0
+3.7i
0.96+
0.39i5.2
-3.2i
11-4.1
-2.1i
-2.5-
0.7i-6.0
-1.7i
-3.5-
0.4i-4.2
-0.8i
-11.0-
6.1i-5.1
-2.3i
-31.-31.i
12-1.9
-1.6i
-5.2-
3.7i-1.08
-0.73i
0.33-
0.04i-0.79
-0.13i
5.3+
4.9i0.16
+0.04i
-4.4-
6.3i13
0.41-
0.72i0.33
-0.29i
0.01-
0.53i0.59
+0.27i0.036+
0.006i-0.92+
0.20i0.40+
0.27i-2.1
-5.8i
14-1.5
-1.5i
-3.4-
2.5i-0.79
-0.62i
1.04+
0.42i0.14
+0.23i
4.4+
4.5i0.84
+0.78i
-3.6-
4.6i15
-2.1-
1.4i-2.9
-2.7i
-1.8-
0.4i1.6
-0.3i
-0.26-
0.56i1.7
+3.6i
1.21-
0.03i-15.-
10.i16
-1.0-
1.4i-1.3
+0.6i
-0.51-
0.86i1.08
+0.43i
0.85+
0.74i2.9
+0.7i
0.97+
0.80i-2.5
-2.7i
17-0.15
-0.15i
0.25+
1.20i-0.82
-0.49i
-0.67-
0.18i-0.74
-0.26i
-2.7-
3.8i-0.89
-0.71i
-4.3-
7.9i18
1.20+
0.25i2.0
+2.0i
-0.63-
0.40i-
0.48i-1.2
-0.8i
-6.7-
6.1i-0.46
-1.18i
-11.-16.i
19-0.49
-0.82i-0.40
-0.63i
-0.61-
0.61i-0.28
+0.02i
-0.29-
0.06i-0.58
-0.07i-0.41
-0.18i
-1.7-
4.5i20
-0.18-
0.67i-0.48
0.02-
0.28i0.38
+0.38i
0.36+
0.57i1.2
+1.4i
0.30+
0.62i-0.27+
0.96i21
-0.26-
0.74i-0.8
-1.2i
-0.06-
0.29i0.57
+0.36i
0.20+
0.20i1.3
+2.5i
0.46+
0.57i-0.6
-1.5i
22-3.8
-2.7i
-6.1-
6.7i-0.07
-0.58i
1.4+
1.2i2.5
+1.3i
15.+15.i
1.9+
2.7i15.+
17.i23
-0.71-
0.89i-1.18-
0.46i-0.18
-0.41i
0.62+
0.30i0.57
+0.46i
2.7+
1.9i0.62
+0.62i0.17
+0.58i
24-7.9
-4.3i
-16.-11.i
-4.5-
1.7i0.96
-0.27i
-1.5-
0.6i17.+
15.i0.58
+0.17i
-14.-14.i
25-0.47
+0.69i
-0.5+
2.6i0.50
-0.16i
1.07+
0.45i1.8
+0.05i
5.3-
3.3i1.6
+0.7i
11.3+
0.2i26
-0.35-
0.81i0.47
+0.45i
-0.34-
0.26i0.72
+0.29i
0.55+
0.57i-0.37
+0.94i0.53
+0.60i
-4.5+
0.1i27
0.39+
0.04i1.3
-2.3i
-0.66-0.22
-0.76i
-1.2-
1.4i-5.1
+0.01i-0.48
-1.25i
-7.7-
9.1i28
0.92+
0.11i1.4
+2.0i
0.54-
0.04i0.49
+0.29i
0.49+
0.44i-1.1
-1.8i
0.45+
0.42i0.10+
0.12i29
-11.2-
1.4i-1.3
+5.0i
3.6-
1.8i6.4
+2.9i
20.+3.i
54.+7.i
12.+8.i
120+
80i30
-4.5-
2.7i-6.5
-2.0i
-4.7-
2.0i-5.9
-1.1i
-4.6+
0.2i-2.5
-3.0i
-6.6-
3.1i-14.-
11.i31
6.0+
2.9i8.0
+11.4i
5.1+
0.8i1.8
+1.3i
3.6+
2.1i-0.8
-10.7i
2.6+
2.1i23.+
17.i32
-7.4-
7.1i-3.2
-8.3i
-10.1-
3.6i-7.2
-2.0i
-7.7-
0.8i-21.+
2.i-9.8
-4.9i
-57.-34.i
Table7.16:Part3
ofthepartialsumy5z 8
ofthefirsttw
ow
eightedprojectorsofthefull
EIE
Sdataset
CHAPTER7 139
2526
2728
2930
3132
12.
6+
0.04
i4.
2+
2.7i
0.6
+4.
1i1.
4+
0.1i
5.2
-10
.9i
-5.-
31.i
-5.0
-5.
4i13
.-28
.i2
9.7
+0.
4i5.
1-
0.9i
-13.
0+
0.8i
11.0
+2.
9i42
.+80
.i-3
0.-
4.i
64.+
29.i
-65.
+3.
i3
0.94
+0.
51i
0.1+
1.18
i-0
.54
+0.
30i
0.39
+0.
92i
-1.3
-3.
0i-1
.3-
6.3i
1.2
+2.
4i-2
.8-
5.1i
4-0
.90
-0.
87i-
0.57
-0.
42i
1.26
+0.
19i
-0.3
7-
0.39
i-6
.4-
7.1i
0.19
+1.
24i-
1.3
-1.
8i1.
8+
0.8i
50.
19+
1.32
i0.
59+
0.77
i-0
.32
-0.
84i
-0.2
3+
0.44
i0.
1+
7.0i
-1.1
-2.
7i-3
.2+
1.4i
-0.4
-4.
4i6
0.58
+0.
25i
0.9
-1.
4i-0
.24
+0.
004i
0.47
-0.
73i
12.+
9.i
-10.
6-
1.4i
3.1
+0.
5i-1
3.-
8.i
72.
2+
0.6i
0.3
+2.
0i-1
.5+
1.1i
0.9
+1.
5i2.
4-
7.4i
-1.0
-8.
6i4.
0+
3.0i
-4.5
-3.
5i8
-12.
7-
0.5i
-11.
4-
0.3i
-6.1
-7.
3i-7
.2-
1.9i
-23.
+38
.i15
0+
100i
-20.
-18
.i17
0+
160i
91.
3-
4.2i
-0.3
8+
0.87
i-0
.9+
2.7i
1.8
-0.
1i-1
2.-
22.i
12.+
18.i
9.4
-5.
9i10
.+42
.i10
-0.8
+4.
1i0.
15-
0.48
i-2
.7-
3.4i
-0.7
3+
0.26
i16
.+41
.i5.
2+
0.4i
-1.7
+6.
1i2.
4-
9.3i
110.
47-
0.36
i-4
.3-
3.5i
0.01
-1.5
i0.
7+
2.8i
-2.9
-10
.7i
-22.
-14
.i20
.+27
.i-4
8.-
39.i
120.
06+
4.2i
0.02
-1.
26i
-3.5
-2.
7i-0
.12
+0.
30i
28.+
43.i
1.1
-7.
0i4.
4+
8.8i
-5.-
21.i
130.
7+
1.4i
0.78
+0.
94i
-1.7
-0.
7i0.
92+
1.03
i0.
7+
16.i
0.2
-7.
3i3.
9+
5.9i
-1.0
-8.
7i14
0.8
+4.
1i0.
90+
0.33
i-3
.7-
2.3i
0.91
+0.
87i
20.+
42.i
-2.8
-9.
5i6.
9+
8.4i
-9.-
19.i
153.
2+
3.5i
2.4
-0.
2i-5
.9-
0.9i
3.3
+0.
4i37
.+53
.i-1
3.-
8.i
20.+
8.i
-25.
-14
.i16
2.4
+2.
4i1.
1+
1.3i
-2.7
+0.
04i
1.3
+1.
4i15
.+14
.i-7
.-15
.i7.
0+
6.6i
-13.
-18
.i17
0.69
-0.
47i
-0.8
1-
0.35
i0.
04+
0.39
i0.
11+
0.92
i-1.
4-
11.2
i-2
.7-
4.5i
2.9
+6.
0i-7
.1-
7.4i
182.
6-
0.5i
0.45
+0.
47i
-2.3
+1.
3i2.
0+
1.4i
5.0
-1.
3i-2
.0-
6.5i
11.4
+8.
0i-8
.3-
3.2i
19-0
.16
+0.
50i-
0.26
-0.
34i
-0.
66i
-0.0
4+
0.54
i-1.
8+
3.6i
-2.0
-4.
7i0.
8+
5.1i
-3.6
-10
.1i
200.
45+
1.07
i0.
29+
0.72
i-0
.76
-0.
22i
0.29
+0.
49i
2.9
+6.
4i-1
.1-
5.9i
1.3
+1.
8i-2
.0-
7.2i
210.
05+
1.8i
0.57
+0.
55i
-1.4
-1.
2i0.
44+
0.49
i3.
+20
.i0.
2-
4.6i
2.1
+3.
6i-0
.8-
7.7i
22-3
.3+
5.3i
0.94
-0.
37i
0.01
-5.
1i-1
.8-
1.1i
7.+
54.i
-3.0
-2.
5i-1
0.7
-0.
8i2.
-21
.i23
0.7
+1.
6i0.
60+
0.53
i-1
.25
-0.
48i
0.42
+0.
45i
8.+
12.i
-3.1
-6.
6i2.
1+
2.6i
-4.9
-9.
8i24
0.2
+11
.3i
0.1
-4.
5i-9
.1-
7.7i
0.12
+0.
10i
80+
120i
-11.
-14
.i17
.+23
.i-3
4.-
57.i
251.
4+
1.4i
0.6
+1.
6i-0
.83
-0.
46i
-0.1
2+
1.31
i0.
2-
2.0i
-2.2
-3.
9i-3
.2+
3.5i
-4.7
-3.
0i26
1.6
+0.
6i1.
0+
1.0i
-1.3
+0.
7i1.
5+
0.5i
5.0
+6.
2i-7
.2-
7.5i
6.9
+1.
4i-1
0.2
-6.
2i27
-0.4
6-
0.83
i0.
7-
1.3i
-0.5
2-
0.52
i1.
05-
0.59
i-2
.+16
.i-0
.5+
5.9i
5.8
+1.
9i-0
.4+
5.3i
281.
31-
0.12
i0.
5+
1.5i
-0.5
9+
1.05
i0.
74+
0.74
i-1
.8-
6.8i
-0.2
-5.
1i1.
9+
0.2i
-0.1
5+
0.22
i29
-2.0
+0.
2i6.
2+
5.0i
16.-
2.i
-6.8
-1.
8i-7
3.-
73.i
-56.
+3.
i-7
1.-
29.i
-26.
-7.
i30
-3.9
-2.
2i-7
.5-
7.2i
5.9
-0.
5i-5
.1-
0.2i
3.-
56.i
-6.3
-6.
3i-7
.+13
.i-1
8.-
41.i
313.
5-
3.2i
1.4
+6.
9i1.
9+
5.8i
0.2
+1.
9i-2
9.-
71.i
13.-
7.i
-14.
-14
.i28
.+26
.i32
-3.0
-4.
7i-6
.2-
10.2
i5.
3-
0.4i
0.22
-0.
15i
-7.-
26.i
-41.
-18
.i26
.+28
.i-6
6.-
66.i
Tabl
e7.
17:P
art4
ofth
epa
rtia
lsum
{ .,+v ofthe
first
two
wei
ghte
dpro
ject
orso
fthe
full
EIE
Sda
tase
t
List of Figures
3.1 Two componentvectorin | Ù . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243.2 Two componentvectorin theGaussplane . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243.3 Multiplication of two complex numbers} and~ . . . . . . . . . . 253.4 Nondirectionalstargraph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373.5 Nondirectionalcompletegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.1 Communicationbehavior beforerotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434.2 Communicationbehavior afterrotation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454.3 Equivalentto non-directionalstargraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.5) 484.4 Symmetricalperturbationof non-directionalstargraphrepresented
in Eq.(4.7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504.5 Asymmetricperturbationof anon-directionalstar . . . . . . . . . 514.6 Asymmetricstargraph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544.7 Perturbedstargraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.15) . . . . . . . . . . 564.8 Completesymmetricbidirectionalgraphcorrespondingto Eq.(4.26) 614.9 Completedirectionalcomplex graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624.10 A network consistingof two subgroupsandsymmetricbilateral
communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
5.1 EIES:In-degreesortedby amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 695.2 EIES:Inboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount . . . . . . . 695.3 EIES:Out-degreesortedby amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705.4 EIES:Outboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount . . . . . . 705.5 EIESsubset:In-degree;k: authorID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745.6 EIES subset:Inboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount;k:
authorID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745.7 EIESsubset:Out-degreesortedby amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . 765.8 EIESsubset:Outboundnormalizedstrengthsortedby amount . . 76
6.1 Eigenspectrumof thecompleteEIESdatasetsortedby value . . . 806.2 Eigenspectrumof the completeEIES datasetsortedby absolute
value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
141
142 CHAPTER7
6.3 Cumulativecoveredvarianceby eigenvaluesµ ö . . . . . . . . . . 816.4 Absolutevaluedistribution for theeigenvectorcorrespondingto µ ³ 826.5 Phasedistribution of the eigenvectorcomponentscorresponding
to µ ³ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836.6 Distributionof
± Û�Ù>´>±. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
6.7 Distributionof¶Å· Û�Ù>´Ï¹
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856.8 Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the3rd eigenvector . . . . 866.9 Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the3rd eigenvector . . . . 866.10 Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the5theigenvector . . . . 876.11 Phasedistribution for the5theigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886.12 Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the4theigenvector . . . . 896.13 Phasedistribution for the4theigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896.14 Eigenvectorcomponentdistribution for the6theigenvector . . . . 906.15 Phasedistribution for the6theigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906.16 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³ . . 976.17 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ ³ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976.18 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù . . 986.19 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ Ù . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986.20 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ æ . . 996.21 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ æ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996.22 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ð . . 1006.23 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ ð . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006.24 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ í . . 1016.25 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ í . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016.26 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ñ . . 1026.27 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ ñ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026.28 Eigenspectrumof theEIESdatasubsetsortedby amount . . . . . 1046.29 Eigenspectrumof theEIESsubsetsortedby absolutevalue . . . . 1046.30 Cumulativecoveredvariancegivenin Tab.( 6.12) . . . . . . . . . 1056.31 Distribution of theabsolutevalueof theeigenvectorcomponents
forÛ¸³
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086.32 Distributionof thephase
¶¸· Û¸³(´ · µ ³û¹X¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086.33 Distribution of theabsolutevalueof theeigenvectorcomponents
forÛ�Ù
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116.34 Distributionof phase
¶Å· Û�Ù>´ · µ Ù�¹X¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
CHAPTER7 143
6.35 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ ³ . . 1126.36 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ ³ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126.37 Densityplot of realpartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingto µ Ù . . 1136.38 Densityplot of imaginarypartof eigenprojectorcorrespondingtoµ Ù . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
7.1 Stockmarket asbipartite-graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
List of Tables
3.1 Definitionsof role,status,rank,prestige . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173.2 OrderandSynonymity of role,status,rank,prestige. . . . . . . . 183.3 Eigensystemof astargraphin Fig.( 3.4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373.4 Eigensystemof acompletegraphin Fig.( 3.5) . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.1 Communicationbehavior representation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424.2 Communicationbehavior representationin thematrix
ù. . . . . 45
4.3 Eigensystemforù��
in Eq.(4.6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494.4 Eigensystemfor the perturbedstar in Eq.( 4.7) after rotation in
Fig.( 4.4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504.5 Eigensystemfor theperturbedstarwith asymmetriccommunica-
tion givenin Fig.( 4.5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524.6 Eigensystemfor theperturbedstarasin Fig.( 4.5) in reverseddi-
rection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524.7 Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 4.6) . . . . 534.8 Eigensystemfor
ù�� ðin Eq.(4.14)with � ÑTü�� ÝIß . . . . . . . . 55
4.9 Eigensystemforù�� ð
in Eq.(4.14)with � Ñ ± � ± Ç È�������� . . . . . . 564.10 Eigensystemfor
ù�� ðg�in Eq.(4.16)with � Ñ6ü�� ÝIß . . . . . . . . 57
4.11 Eigensystemforù�� ðg�
in Eq.(4.16)with � Ñ ± � ± Ç�È�������� . . . . . . 574.12 Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 4.6) . . . . 574.13 Eigensystemof
ù�� í in Eq.(4.27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624.14 Eigensystemof matrix
ù�� í,� in Eq.(4.29) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 634.15 Eigensystemfor
ù�� ðg�in Eq.(4.16)with � Ñ ± � ± Ç È�������� . . . . . . 63
4.16 Eigensystemof therotatedmatrix � in Eq.(4.30) . . . . . . . . . 65
5.1 Full EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 685.2 Outbound,inboundstrength,centralityandprestigeof the EIES
completedataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725.3 Numberof messagesexchangedbetweenmembersin the EIES
subset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 735.4 Outboundandinboundstrengthfor the EIES subsetnormalized
by thetotal numberof messages,aswell ascentralityandprestige 77
145
146 CHAPTER7
5.5 Eigensystemof the EIES subsetas calculatedwith the methodusedby Freeman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
6.1 Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tabs.(7.2)-(7.5) 826.2 Comparisonof anchorsof the full datasetbetweenthe method
usedby Freeman( ú · µ ö ¹ ) andthemethodpresentedin this book(ù · µ ö ¹ ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
6.3 Part 1: Back rotatedweightedprojectorbasedcorrespondingtothefirst eigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
6.4 Part 2: Back rotatedweightedprojectorbasedcorrespondingtothefirst eigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
6.5 Submatricesbasedonfirst eigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936.6 Part1: Backrotatedweightedprojectorcorrespondingto thesec-
ondeigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946.7 Part2: Backrotatedweightedprojectorcorrespondingto thesec-
ondeigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946.8 Submatricesbasedonsecondeigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956.9 Submatricesbasedon third eigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956.10 part1: Backrotatedweightedprojectorcorrespondingto thethird
eigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966.11 part2: Backrotatedweightedprojectorcorrespondingto thethird
eigenvalue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966.12 Cumulativecoveredvarianceof eigenvaluesfrom Tab.( 6.18) . . . 1056.13 Submatrixbasedon first eigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066.14 Submatricesbasedonsecondeigenvector . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066.15 Partial sum
ù ³>ô Ù. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
6.16 Partial sumù æXô '
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096.17 Eigensystemfor
ùwith � ÑTü�� Ý<ß . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
6.18 Eigensystemofù
with � Ñ · ± � ± ¼ ¶¸· � ¹X¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106.19 Comparisonof anchorsfor theEIESsubset . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
7.1 Forecastedresultsvs. actualresultsof 2001dietelectionsin Baden-Wurttemberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
7.2 Full EIESdataseteigensystem:µ ³ to µT� . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1247.3 Full EIESdataseteigensystem:µ�� to µ ³(ñ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1257.4 Full EIESdataseteigensystem:µ ³�' to µ Ù í . . . . . . . . . . . . 1267.5 Full EIESdataseteigensystem:µ Ù>ð to µ æ>Ù . . . . . . . . . . . . 1277.6 Full EIESdataseteigensystemaccordingto Freemanµ ³ to µT� . . 1287.7 Full EIESdataseteigensystemaccordingto Freemanµ�� to µ ³(ñ . 1297.8 Full EIESdataseteigensystemaccordingto Freemanµ ³�' to µ Ù í . 1307.9 Full EIESdataseteigensystemaccordingto Freemanµ Ù>ð to µ æ>Ù . 131
CHAPTER7 147
7.10 Part 1 of partialsumó ³>ô Ù
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsofthefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
7.11 Part 2 of partialsumó ³>ô Ù
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsofthefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
7.12 Part 3 of partialsumó ³>ô Ù
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsofthefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
7.13 Part 4 of partialsumó ³>ô Ù
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsofthefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
7.14 Part1 of thepartialsumó æXô ñ
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsof thefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
7.15 Part2 of thepartialsumó æXô ñ
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsof thefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
7.16 Part3 of thepartialsumó æXô ñ
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsof thefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
7.17 Part4 of thepartialsumó æXô ñ
of thefirst two weightedprojectorsof thefull EIESdataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Bibliography
[AB04] K.J.Arrow andR. Borzekowski. Limited network connectionsandthedistributionof wages.TheFederalReserveBoard:FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries,2004–41,Aug 2004.
[ADDG � 04] A. Arenas, L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, P.M. Gleiser, andR. Guimera. Communityanalysisin socialnetworks. TheEuro-peanPhysicalJournalB, 38:373–380,2004.
[AGC03] M.K. Ahuja, D.F. Galletta,andK.M. Carley. Individual Central-ity andPerformancein Virtual R&D Groups:An empiricalstudy.ManagementScience, 49(1):21–38,Jan2003.
[ALB99] RekaAlbert Albert LaszloBarabasi.Emergenceof scalingin ran-domnetworks. Science, 286(5439):509–512,Oct 1999.
[BA02] A.-L. Barabasiand R. Albert. Statisticalmechanicsof complexnetworks. Reviewsof ModernPhysics, 74(1):47– 97,Jan2002.
[Bav48] A. Bavelas. A mathematicalmodel for groupstructures.HumanOrganization, 7:16–30,1948.
[BB01] A.L. BarabasiandG.Bianconi.Bose-einsteincondensationin com-plex networks. PhysicalReview Letters, 86(24):5632– 5635,Jun2001.
[BBV04] A. Barrat,M. Barthelemy, andA. Vespignani.Weightedevolvingnetworks: Couplingtopologyandweight dynamics. PhysicalRe-view Letters, 92:228701,Jun2004.
[BF03] S. Borgatti and P.C. Foster. The network paradigmin organiza-tional research:A review andtypology. Journal of Management,29(6):991–1013,2003.
149
150 CHAPTER7
[BL01] P. BonacichandP. Lloyd. Eigenvector-like Measurementof Cen-trality for AsymmetricRelations.SocialNetworks, (23):191– 201,2001.
[BL04] U. BrandesandJ.Lerner. Structuralsimilarity in graphs.To appearin Proceedingsof the15thIntl. Symp.AlgorithmsandComputation(ISAAC ’04), 2004.
[BR85] G.A. Barnett and R.E. Rice. Longitudinal Non-EuclideanNet-works: Applying galileo. SocialNetworks, 7:287–322,1985.
[BRRT01] A. Borodin,G.O.Roberts,J.S.Rosenthal,andP. Tsaparas.Findingauthoritiesandhubsfrom link structuresontheworld wideweb. InProceedingsof the10thInternationalWorld WideWebConference,pages415–429,Hongkong,May 2001.ACM.
[BS00] J.L. Barlow andI. Slapnicar. Optimalperturbationboundsfor thehermitianeigenvalueproblem.LinearAlgebra andits Applications,309(1):19–43,2000.
[Bur79] A. Burghardt. Einfuhrung in die AllgemeineSoziologie. WiSoKurzlehrbucherReiheSozialwissenschaften.VerlagFranzVahlen,Munchen,3. edition,1979.
[Bus04] Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc. Bush-Cheney ’04.http://www.georgewbush.com/GetActive/ (16.08.2004), Feb2004.
[CD02] J.Choi andJ.Danowski. Making a GlobalCommunityon theNet– Global Village or Global Metropolis?: A Network AnalysisofUsenetNewsgroups.Journal of ComputerMediatedCommunica-tion: www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol7/issue3/choi.html, 7(3),Apr 2002.
[Chi98] N. Chino. Hilbert spacetheoryin psychology. Bulletin of thefac-ulty of lettersNo.28Aichi GakuinUniversity, Japan,1998.
[CS97] P. Cvetkovic, D. amd Rowlinson and S. Simic. Eigenspacesofgraphs, volume66 of Encyclopediaof Mathematicsand Its Appli-cations. CambridgeUniversityPress,Cambridge,1997.
[dF00] C. da Fonseca.The inertia of Hermitianblock matriceswith zeromaindiagonal. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 311(1):153–160,Feb2000.
CHAPTER7 151
[Dic04] Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. ”communication”.http://www.merriam-webster.com(14 Feb2004),Feb2004.
[DMM00] F.M. Dopico, J. Moro, andJ.M. Molera. Weyl-type relative per-turbationboundsfor eigensystemsof Hermitianmatrices. LinearAlgebra andits Applications, 309(1):3–18,2000.
[DR01] P. Domingosand M. Richardson. Mining the network value ofcustomers. In ACM Press,editor, Proceedingsof the 7th ACMSIGKDD International Conferenceon Knowledge Discovery andDataMining, pages57–66,2001.
[DS88] N. DunfordandJ.T. Schwartz. Linear Operators,Spectral Theory,SelfAdjoint Operators in Hilbert Space(Wiley ClassicsLibrary).Wiley, New York, 1988.
[EB99] M.G. EverettandS.P. Borgatti.Thecentralityof groupsandclasses.Journalof MathematicalSociology, 23(3):181–201,1999.
[EMB02] H. Ebel,L.-I. Mielsch,andS.Bornholdt. Scale-freetopologyof e-mail networks. e-publication: www.arXiv.org (05.05.2003), cond-mat(0201476),Feb2002.
[FF62] L.R. Ford andD.R. Fulkerson.Flowsin networks. PrincetonUni-versityPress,Princeton,N.J.,1962.
[FF79] L. FreemanandS.Freeman.Thenetworkersnetwork: astudyof theimpactof anew communicationsmediumonsociometricstructure.SocialScienceResearch Reports, (46),1979.
[Fre84] L. Freeman.Theimpactof computerbasedcommunicationon thesocial structureof an emerging scientific speciality. Social Net-works, 6:201–221,1984.
[Fre97] L. Freeman.Uncoveringorganizationalhierachies.Computational& MathematicalOrganizationTheory, 3(1):5– 18,1997.
[Fre04] L. Freeman. Peronalcommunication. Email (27 Oct 2004),Oct2004.
[Fri04] Friendster. Friendster. http://www.friendster.com(11 Oct 2004),Oct2004.
152 CHAPTER7
[GDDG� 02] R. Guimera,L. Danon,A. Diaz-Guilera,F. Giralt, andA. Arenas.Self-similar communitystructurein organisations.e-publication:www.arXiv.org (29.04.2003), cond-mat(0211498),Nov 2002.
[GHW97] L. Garton,C. Haythornthwaite,andB. Wellman. Studyingonlinesocialnetworks. Journal of ComputerMediatedCommunication:www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/garton.html, 3(1),1997.
[Gid95] A. Giddens. Soziologie. Nausner& Nausner, Wien, 1. edition,1995.
[GKK01] K.-I. Goh, B. Kahng, and D. Kim. Spectraand eigenvectorsofscale-freenetworks. PhysicalReview E, 64(5):1– 5, Oct 2001.
[GKR98] D. Gibson,J.Kleinberg,andP. Raghavan.InferringWebcommuni-tiesfrom Link Topology. In Proceedingsof theninth ACM confer-enceon Hypertext and hypermedia, Conferenceon Hypertext andHypermedia,pages225– 234.ACM, ACM-Press,Jun1998.
[GN02] M. Girvan and M.E.J. Newman. Communitystructurein socialandbiologicalnetworks. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.USA, 99(12):7821–7826,Jun2002.
[Gro04] D. Gross. It’ s who you know. Really. TheNew York Times, 22ndAug. 2004,Aug 2004.
[GW95] L. GartonandB. Wellman.Socialimpactsof electronicmail in or-ganizations:A review of researchliterature.CommunicationYear-book, 18:434–453,1995.
[Hay45] F.A. Hayek. The Use of Knowledgein Society. The AmericanEconomicReview, 35(4):519– 530,1945.
[Hel00] S. Helm. Viral marketing: Establishingcustomerrelationshipsbyword-of-mouse.ElectronicMarkets, 10(3):158–161,Jul2000.
[Her02] C.P. Herrero. Ising model in small-world networks. PhysicalRe-view E, 65(66110):1–6,Jun2002.
[HGS04] B. Hoserand A. Geyer-Schulz. Eigen SystemAnalysis of Her-mitian Adjacency Matricesof PerturbedStar Graphs. In Centerfor Methodologyand University of Ljubliana Slovenia Informat-ics, Instituteof SocialSiencesat Facultyof SocialSiences,editors,SunbeltXXIV InternationalSocialNetworkConference, page56.INSNA, BirografikaBORI, d.o.o.,Ljubliana,May 2004.
CHAPTER7 153
[HJ90] R. HornandC.R.Johnson.Matrix Analysis. CambridgeUniversityPress,Cambridge,1990.
[HS74] M.W. HirschandS.Smale.DifferentialEquations,DynamicalSys-tems,and Linear Algebra. PureandApplied Mathematics.Aca-demicPress,SanDiego,1974.
[Hub65] C.H. Hubbell. An Input-outputApproachto Clique Identification.Sociometry, 28(4):377–399,Dec1965.
[Ips03] I.C.F. Ipsen. A noteon unifying absoluteandrelative perturbationbounds.LinearAlgebra andits Applications, 358:239– 253,2003.
[Jun99] D. Jungnickel. Graphs,NetworksandAlgorithms. Number5 in Al-gorithmsandComputationin Mathematics.SpringerVerlag,Berlin,1999.
[Kat53] L. Katz. A new statusindex derived from sociometricanalysis.Psychometrika, 18(1):39–43,Mar 1953.
[Kat95] T. Kato. PerturbationTheoryfor Linear Operators. Springer, NewYork, 2ndedition,1995.
[Ker04] Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc. Kerry-Edwards 2004.http://volunteer.johnkerry.com/recruit/(08.08.2004),Aug 2004.
[KH93] D. KrackhardtandJ.R.Hanson.Informal networks: Thecompanybehindthe chart. Harvard BusinessReview, 71(4):104–110,Jul1993.
[Kle99] JonM. Kleinberg. Authoritative sourcesin a hyperlinkedenviron-ment.JACM, 46(5):604–632,sep1999.
[Kre02] V.E. Krebs. Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections,24(3):43– 52,2002.
[Lin04] LinkedIn.Linkedin. (https://www.linkedin.com/11Oct2004),Oct2004.
[LM04] V. Latora and M. Marchiori. A measureof centrality basedon the network efficiency. e-publication: www.arXiv.org, cond-mat(0402050):1–16,Feb2004.
[Mat97] R.Mathias.Spectralperturbationboundsfor positivedefinitematri-ces.SIAMJournalonMatrix AnalysisandApplications, 18(4):959–980,1997.
154 CHAPTER7
[Mey00] C.D. Meyer. Matrix AnalysisandAppliedLinear Algebra. Societyfor IndustrialandAppliedMathematics,Philadelphia,2000.
[NG03] M.E.J. NewmanandM. Girvan. Mixing patternsand communitystructure in networks, volume 625 of Lecture Notesin Physics,pages66–87.Springer, 2003.
[Ork04] Orkut. Orkut. http://www.orkut.com/(11 Oct 2004),Oct 2004.
[PBMW98] L. Page,S. Brin, R. Motwani, andT. Winograd. The PageRankCitation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technicalreport,ComputerScienceDepartment,StanfordUniversity, Jan1998.
[Pre00] J. Preece.Online Communities:DesigningUsability, SupportingSociability. Wiley, Chichester, 2000.
[PT03] H.W. Park andM. Thalwall. Hyperlink analysesof theworld wideweb: A review. Journal of Computer-MediatedCommunications,8(4),Jul 2003.
[Rhe00] H. Rheingold. The Virtual Community. MIT Press,Cambridge,2000.
[RS00] W. RichardsandA. Seary. Eigenanalysisof networks. Journal ofSocialStructure, 1(2),Feb2000.
[Sam48] P.A. Samuelson.Consumptiontheoryin termsof revealedprefer-ence.Economica, 15(60):243–253,Nov 1948.
[Sch95] B. Schafers. Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. Uni-Taschenbucher.Leske& Budrich,4. edition,1995.
[Sim00] H.A. Simon. Administrative Behavior : A Studyof Decision-Making Processesin Administrative Organizations. Free Press,New York, 4 edition,2000.
[SK99] M. Smith and P. Kollock. Communitiesin Cyberspace. Taylor,London,1999.
[Smi02] R. Smith. Instant Messagingas a Scale-freeNetwork. e-publication: www.arXiv.org, cond-mat(0206378),192002.
[SR03a] A.J. SearyandW.D. Richards.Spectral methodsfor analyzingandvisualizingnetworks: An introduction, pages209–228. NationalAcademiesPress,Jan2003.
CHAPTER7 155
[SR03b] M.R.SubramaniandB. Rajagopalan.Knowledge-sharingandinflu-encein onlinesocialnetworksvia viral marketing.Communicationsof theACM, 46(12):300–307,Dec2003.
[Str01] S.H. Strogatz. Nonlinear Dynamicsand Chaos. PerseusBookGroup,Cambridge,MA, 1. edition,2001.
[SW63] C.E.ShannonandW. Weaver. MathematicalTheoryof Communi-cation. Universityof Illinois Press,Chicago,1963.
[TWH03] J.R.Tyler, D.M. Wilkinson, andB.A. Huberman. Email asspec-troscopy: Automateddiscovery of communitystructurewithin or-ganizations. e-publication: www.arXiv.org (31.03.2003), cond-mat(0303264),2003.
[Wel01] B. Wellman. Computernetworks as social networks. Science,293:2031–2034,Sep2001.
[Wel02] B. Wellman. Designingtheinternet.Communicationsof theACM,45(5):91–96,May 2002.
[WF94] S. WassermannandK. Faust. SocialNetworkAnalysis,MethodsandApplications. CambridgeUniversityPress,Cambridge,1994.
[Wol03] Wolfram Research,Inc. Mathematica. Wolfram Research,Inc.,Champaign,Illinois, 5.0edition,2003.
[YC02] B. Yaltaghianand M. Chignell. Re-rankingsearchresultsusingnetwork analysis:A casestudywith google.In IBM Centrefor Ad-vancedStudiesConference,editor, Proceedingsof the2002confer-enceof theCentre for AdvancedStudiesonCollaborativeresearch,page14,2002.