City University of New York (CUNY) City University of New York (CUNY)
CUNY Academic Works CUNY Academic Works
Dissertations and Theses City College of New York
2021
The Push Factors that Impact Sex Trafficking in the Former Soviet The Push Factors that Impact Sex Trafficking in the Former Soviet
Union Union
Liliya Kenzhebayeva CCNY
How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know!
More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/920
Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu
This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected]
The Push Factors that Impact Sex Trafficking in the Former Soviet Union
Author: Liliya Kenzhebayeva Advisor: Prof. Jean Krasno
Second reader: Prof. Jacques Fomerand
This thesis is submitted in the fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Collin Powell School at The City College
of New York
2021
2021
2
Acknowledgements.
I would like to thank and dedicate this work to my mother Zinaida Sabitova who has
given me endless support, motivation and love.
I would also thank Prof. Jean Krasno, my advisor, for leading me throughout this
challenging research process with patience. In addition, I remain grateful to Prof. Jacques
Fomerand, for his guidance in the initial steps of this research project.
3
The Push Factors that Impact Sex Trafficking
in the Former Soviet Union
Abstract.
Sex trafficking is a global problem that has been denounced by the international
community as a human rights abuse and determined to be a modern form of slavery. Through
a comparative analysis of the experiences of Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine as they were a
part of the Soviet Union the study identifies the push factors of sex trafficking in women as
forced labor with particular emphasis on the role of weak legal systems and state institutions,
corruption, social and economic factors, and environmental problems that are linked to
organized crime (the Russian mafia) from 2001 to 2019. The thesis supports the hypothesis
that sex trafficking can be effectively prevented through the establishment of good
governance institutions and practices supported by international organizations.
4
Table of Contents.
Acknowledgements 2
Abstract 3
Acronyms 5
Chapter One: Introduction: Sex trafficking as a global and regional issue of Eastern
Europe and Central Asia 6
Chapter Two: Review of the Literature: Push Factors in sex trafficking 9
Economic factors and Poverty level 9
Social and cultural factors 12
Environmental problems 13
Weak governance and the lack of legal protection 17
Corruption 20
Links with the organized crime (the Russian mafia) 22
Trafficking routes 25
Chapter Three: Country profiles. Comparative analysis 28
Kazakhstan 28
Russia 47
Ukraine 66
Comparative analysis. Part 2 83
Chapter Four: Recommendations to combat sex trafficking as forced labor in countries
of origin 97
Chapter Five: Conclusion 124
Bibliography 129
5
Acronyms.
EU – the European Union
GDP based on PPP - gross domestic product at purchasing power parity
FSU - the Former Soviet Union
IOM - International Organization of Migration
ILO - International Labor Organization
NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization
OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
TIP - Trafficking in Persons
TVPA - Trafficking Victims Protection Act
U.A.E - the United Arab Emirates
UN - the United Nations
UNDP - United Nations Development Program
UNODC - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
US - the United States of America
USSR - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
WHO - World Health Organization
6
Chapter One: Introduction.
Sex trafficking is a modern-day form of slavery that takes place in every region of the
world, including Eastern Europe and Central Asia. According to data released by the
International Labor Organization (ILO) in 2017, more than 40 million people have been
trafficked worldwide, which is 6 adult victims of slavery for every 1000 adults, and 4 child
victims for every 1000 children in the world. Out of these percentages, 71% of human
trafficked victims are women who have been exploited for sex jobs and forced marriages;
25% are children who have been used for organ donors and forced labor; and the rest are men
who have been exploited for labor (ILO, 2017, p. 21). The ILO estimates that human
trafficking and forced labor generate $150 billion in profits. Human trafficking, drugs, and
weapons are in fact the most profitable among all illegal fields (ILO, “Facts and figures”
2017). The issue has risen dramatically around the world, so the Protocol to Prevent,
Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children entered into
force as a supplement to the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized
Crime. The United States Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000 defines
“severe forms of trafficking” as:
Sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion,
or in which the person induced to perform such an act has not attained 18 years of
age; or: b) the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a
person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for subjection
to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery (U.S. Department of
State, TIP Report 2005, p. 12).
Sex trafficking as a forced form of labor is a global problem, but there are some
regions where sex trafficking is on a higher level than in the others, specifically in countries
7
of Eastern Europe, the Former Soviet Union (FSU), and South East Asia. Nations from these
regions have the most frequently reported countries of origin for victims of sex trafficking
(Global Report on Trafficking in Persons UNODC, 2018, p. 21). This study attempts to focus
mainly on victims-migrants from the FSU such as Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine through a
comparative analysis. It is assumed that the reason for the high level of human trafficking by
organized crime in these regions is related to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 which
led to poverty, government instability, and corruption (Crookham, 2004, p. 4).
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) reports that women from the
FSU enter destination countries with tourist or student visas. Some of them are trafficked by
smugglers and transported illegally hidden in cars and trucks. (IOM, 2009, p. 7). Once they
reach a destination country, they are forced into prostitution. Some of them get beaten,
raped, threatened, and placed in inhuman conditions without food. If a woman tries to escape,
criminals threaten her family to pay back the debt for their transportation. Women depend on
their traffickers due to lack of legal immigration documents, the unfamiliarity with a foreign
language, mistrust of police and other authorities. Moreover, drug addiction is one of the
reasons victims are controlled by the mafia. Some of them catch HIV or other sexually
transmitted diseases which leads to committing suicide or they are killed by traffickers as a
warning to other trafficked victims (Shield, 2003, p. 14).
I argue here that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, these countries were run by
corrupt government officials, some of whom were involved in organized crime which have
been enslaving and trafficking vulnerable women abroad. I examine how weak legal systems
that fail to protect human rights, poverty and family situations, and environmental problems
play important roles in causing sex trafficking.
8
Research questions:
How do push factors such as weak legal and state institutions, corruption, economic
and social factors such as poverty in rural areas, and environmental problems impact sex
trafficking from 2001 to 2019? What is the role of organized crime?
Research method:
This is a comparative analysis of three countries, focusing on their profiles by push
factors. The qualitative research data is based on research reports conducted by IOM, ILO,
the US Department of State (TIP Report) and the legal codes of Kazakhstan, Russia, and
Ukraine.
Policy recommendations:
Policy recommendations are offered on improving economic and social stability,
reducing poverty and corruption, and formulating a strategy on combating organized crime
and sex trafficking through international organizations.
9
Chapter Two: Review of the Literature: Push Factors in sex trafficking.
Women are being traded, exploited in prostitution, pornography, and forced labor. Put
it simply, a young woman from a poor family who grew up in a small village with no access
to education is then lured to a big city or abroad by promises of a well-paid job. Once she
leaves the village behind and she finds herself in a completely different situation from the one
she dreamed of. The best scenario is that she ends up working in a cheap brothel with low
pay and fake documents or the worst one is that she might be forced to pay back her “debt”
for travel costs and compelled to maintain “silence” (not telling her parents and friends about
her activities). Moreover, her passport might be taken away and she will be sexually abused.
Getting depressed, she may end up involved in drug or alcohol addiction. In this given
example, the problem of sex-trafficking is rooted not only in poverty and social factors, but
also in gender discrimination, corruption, and weak legal protection for victims in their
countries of origin.
The literature on the most relevant five push factors that have contributed to the
increase of sex trafficking flows from the FSU. They are discussed below in this section.
1. Economic factors and Poverty level.
Poverty is when a state does not have enough material possessions for a person’s basic
needs. It may include social, economic, and political elements (Merriam Webster Online
Dictionary). In the words of the UN agencies:
Poverty is a denial of choices and opportunities, a violation of human dignity. It
means a lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in society. It means not
having enough to feed a family, not having a school or clinic to go to, not having the
land on which to grow one’s food or a job to earn one’s living, not having access to
credit. It means insecurity, powerlessness, and exclusion of individuals, households,
and communities. It means susceptibility to violence, and it often implies living in
10
marginal or fragile environments, without access to clean water or sanitation (UN
Statement, June 1998 – signed by the heads of all UN agencies).
The World Bank identifies poverty as:
Low income and the inability to access the basic goods and services necessary for
survival and dignity. It also includes access to health and education, clean water and
sanitation, lack of voice, and insufficient capacity and opportunity to better one's life
(The World Bank, “Poverty and inequality analysis”, 2011).
In the 1990s, countries of the Eastern bloc and the FSU experienced economic
transitions which led to a sharp drop in income. The collapse of the USSR led to an extreme
decline in GDP per capita - 30 to 35% between 1990 and 1998 which resulted in tripled
poverty and mortality rates (Ghodsee, 2017, p. 63-64). B. Milanovic claims that even in the
transition from communism to capitalism the average post-communist country had only
returned to the 1989 level of GDP per capita by 2015 (Milanovic, 2015, p. 135-138).
Economic restructuring in the FSU and Eastern Europe in the 1990s created a trend of
sex work as one of the ways to earn money for young women. Unemployment, the end of
communism played harder on women than on men. It was harder for women in the
patriarchal region to transfer from the public to the private sector (Bridger et al. 1995, p. 17;
Kay 2006, p. 481; Ashwin 2006, p. 23; Shvedova 2009, p. 151). Anthony De Mauro states
that it was the collapse that allowed the sex trafficking market to be the most profitable in the
post USSR, when a low economy, inflation, weakened border control impacted the criminal
activities (De Mauro, 2016, p. 41). By the late 1990s, around 500,000 women were annually
trafficked from the FSU (IOM cited in McDonald, Moore, and Timoshkina; Hughes; Bloch).
They even have been helping out their families by sending money back home (Tverdova,
2011 p. 334). D. Hughes states: “Whether through poverty, separation, naivete, deception, or
some combination of these factors, thousands of Russian women are leaving their homes in
11
search of livelihood abroad and ending up violently exploited, enslaved in the international
sex industry” (Hughes, 2000, p. 627). She also points out that the unequal pay rate and higher
numbers of unemployed women create different levels of poverty in comparison to men.
Despite the trauma and physical abuse, many previously trafficked victims are ready to make
another attempt to go abroad for work in order to avoid poverty at home (Kara, 2009 p. 103).
S. Sulaimanova also admits that the collapse resulted in poverty and unemployment which
led to a massive flow of women of Central Asia being lured into prostitution under false
claims of well-paid jobs abroad as waitresses, dancers, and models. Unemployment among
women, the high level of poverty, and broken hopes made them vulnerable to traffickers
(Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 383).
The economic situation in the region has drastically changed since the transition
period in the 1990s, however the poverty in the region has been disproportionately distributed
even today. Major cities in the selected three countries such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg
(Russia), Almaty and Nursultan (Kazakhstan), and Kyiv (Ukraine) are the most economically
developed ones, but other cities and towns remain in deep poverty. In addition, women living
in big family houses in rural areas with no access to schools and well-paid jobs are more
vulnerable to becoming trapped by traffickers than women living in capitals or large cities
where the economy is more stable.
On the other hand, the FSU (particularly Kazakhstan and Russia) is rich in oil, gas,
and other natural resources that drastically changed the economy in the 2000s. A poor region
turned into a rich area with great potential and resources to be developed. But they are still
dominated by elites who control these countries politically and economically and have close
ties to the Russian mafia (Finckenauer, Voronin, 2001, p. 6).
12
2. Social and cultural factors.
The poverty level in rural areas leads to family situations that pull away young girls
from their houses. Lucia Vreja describes an average low-class family in villages of the FSU
as alcoholic or with abusive parents and a lack of communication and mutual understanding
with their children. All this pushes children to have a “street life” making them vulnerable to
traffickers (Vreja, 2004, p. 53). The social status of women in the period of post-Soviet
Union was very low, most of their husbands lost their jobs after the collapse of the USSR and
became alcoholics, practicing domestic violence at home, while police refused to take this
problem seriously. Domestic violence is one of the major causes for children to run away
from home or at least they spend most of their time in the streets where they can be lured and
recruited by traffickers (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 387). I would also add that there is a saying in
the region “if a man beats you up, it means he loves you” which obviously shows people's
tolerance of domestic violence.
Surveys done by Kleimenov and Shamkov in 2005 show that most trafficked victims
of the FSU are marginalized groups such as the unemployed, homeless, prostitutes, and
orphans. The majority of trafficking victims come from lower socioeconomic strata
(Tverdova, 2011. p. 336). Sadly, the majority of victims have college degrees. Yekaterina
Tverdova explains that this phenomenon of how educated women end up being enslaved is
due to two factors: 1. The post-communist transition affected all social levels, no matter the
job position or degrees people held. 2. College degrees did not save you from naivete during
the harsh transition (Tverdova, 2011, p. 337). Talking about naivete, Saltanat Sulaimanova
also admits that one of her respondents realized that she would have to get into prostitution,
but she was sure that it would be the same story as in the movie “Pretty Woman” where she
would find a man who falls in love and supports her. Even though this sounds absurd and
naive but for women living in an isolated bloc from the rest of the world for 70 years, these
13
types of fantasies are absolutely normal. Women who watch soap operas with the glamorous
life of the West full of prosperity and happiness do not anticipate being manipulated,
physically or psychologically abused (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 386). I would also add that
college degrees have nothing to do with the knowledge of life outside of the Soviet Union.
When the borders were opened, free trade between post-Soviet countries and the rest of the
world, foreign goods, and globalization, in general, made international sex trafficking easier
for sex traffickers to profit from that (De Mauro, 2016, p. 42).
Yekaterina Tverdova adds the facts of gender inequality, patriarchic traditions, a
negative connotation of prostitution and sexual revolution during Perestroika considered as
psychological and social aspects of push factors (Tverdova, 2011, p. 332). Saltanat
Sulaimanova also writes about gender inequality in Central Asian countries admitting the fact
that even if women are employed, they often experience discrimination and sexual
harassment at work. The pay rate is not equal either, so when women see a job abroad with
$60,000 annual pay rate, an amount that they would never have dreamed of, they
automatically become a target for traffickers (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 387). Moreover, Central
Asia has its local traditions that have slavery connotations which include rituals of “kalym”
(payment) for the bride, and kidnapping of a bride. For example, back in the days in
Kazakhstan, it was impossible to prosecute these types of human trafficking violations since
it was not addressed in the criminal legal code (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 380).
3. Environmental problems.
Conflict and natural disasters are drivers leading to poverty and lack of human rights
which make people vulnerable to human trafficking. Moreover, both war and natural disasters
are drivers for migration when displaced people look for jobs out of their towns or countries.
It is not an easy task to find a relationship between climate change, intensified vulnerabilities,
14
and sex trafficking. Nicole Molinari claims that environmental disasters and forced migration
lead to a loss of livelihoods, and poverty which create opportunities for sexual exploitation.
She argues that social and economic factors that impact sex trafficking have a generalized
nature in developing countries while,
[C]limate change matters more individualized and naturalized with limited ability
inform robust knowledge and responsive policy and practice. There is a little
examination of the rooted, contingent, and context-specific forces that underlie,
exacerbate, and perpetuate these vulnerability factors, thus limiting what is counted as
evidence of vulnerability to trafficking (Molinari, 2017, p. 54).
According to Jennifer Kimball from “Linking Human Rights and the Environment,”
victims of environmental degradation are the most vulnerable populations of society which
carry a “disproportionate burden of human rights abuse.” Those people do not have rights and
access to health services, property, education, and jobs (Kimball, “Human Trafficking, Haiti
and the Environment,” 2010). IOM reports that climate migrants that lost savings in natural
disasters have not only limited access to employment and education but also have minimal
bargaining power to defend their rights and can become a target for exploitation (IOM,
“Climate change - human trafficking nexus,” 2016). Wudan Yan cited Michael Gerrard,
director of the Sabin Center for Climate Law at Columbia University, who predicted that by
2050 there will be 250 million “climate refugees” from tropical regions who might become
victims of human trafficking. Gerrard warns the international community to take actions,
“Don’t go after climate refugees,” he says, “Go after traffickers” (Yan, “The Surprising link
between climate change and human trafficking,” 2018).
The Soviet Union has experienced three environmental catastrophes that shocked the
world such as the nuclear explosion in Chernobyl (Ukraine) in 1986, desiccation, and
desertification of the Aral Sea (between Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan), and irradiation of the
Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (Kazakhstan). In the 1990s on the territory of modern Russia,
15
there was the bursting of an oil pipeline where government officials did not take immediate
actions, turning 40% of the country's territory (an area about three quarters as large as the
US) into extreme ecological degradation. Fifty-six oblasts (states) have been identified as
polluted, degraded, and irradiated. Russia has suffered from environmental degradation in
each part of the country - extraction of mineral resources in tundra affecting millions of
indigenous people of Northern Russia; deforestation of taiga in the regions of Ural, Angara
Basin in Siberia, northern European part of Russia; the steppe regions in Kalmykia and a
region of Baikal Lake. All have soil exhaustion and erosion. Urbanization, water and air
pollution, and climate change are other major concerns of ecology in Russia (Glenn, “Russia:
A country study,” 1996).
More than any event in history, the Chernobyl disaster which occurred in now
independent Ukraine, affected Belarus, and Russia with a population of 37 million people
from 19 oblasts (states) and republics. Radiation affected more than 2.2 million people to
varying degrees. It damaged flora and fauna including farms, forests, and food production in
the FSU. Radiation from Chernobyl is also detected in parts of Scandinavia, Poland, the
Baltic States, Germany, Switzerland, Northern France, England, Africa, and China (De Leo
“The first nuclear refugees come home,” 2007). By 1997, more than 150,000 Belarusians and
235,000 Ukrainians migrated abroad and the rest remained living in poverty and poor health
conditions. The government of Belarus has spent more than $250 billion in 10 years for
cleaning up after Chernobyl (IOM, 1997, p. 13-15).
Another environmental disaster is the Aral Sea where vulnerable populations might be
a target for traffickers. Generally speaking, environmental impacts created by the drying up
of the Aral Sea between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan include desertification, salinization of
water and soil, dust storms, and climate change. Among all these problems the most serious
one is the impact on health which includes respiratory health problems among children,
16
cancers, and infant mortality. Moreover, the region remains mired in deep poverty,
unemployment, high inflation, and there is no drinking water within 40 kilometers. More than
5 million people were affected by the disaster of the Aral Sea and around 130,000 people
were relocated abroad or to other regions of countries (Thompson, “The Aral Sea Crisis,”
Columbia University, 2008). Small et al. provided a study that shows how ecological
problems are directly linked with psychological issues where respondents witnessed not the
only destruction of the environment but also the hope for a better life. Moreover, around 50%
of respondents living in the Aral Sea region stated that they want to move to another
city/country because of the environment (Small et. al, 2001, p. 548).
The third disaster is the Semipalatinsk Test Site (Polygon), a testing station for the
Soviet Union’s nuclear weapons which is located in the north of Kazakhstan. The USSR
conducted 456 nuclear tests between 1949 - 1989 that affected people’s health and the
environment. According to Farangiz Najibullah and Ukulyay Bestayeva, no one knew the full
impact of radiation which was hidden for many years by the Soviet government officials
(Najibullah, Bestayeva “Slow death in Kazakhstan’s land of nuclear test”, 2011). The
secretive project of the USSR is worse than Chernobyl due to operations taking a long time
and slowly killing people and nature. In the 1950s, around 80% of the population of
Semipalatinsk had genetic mutations in the minisatellite regions (Bauer et al, 2005, p. 412).
There are no exact numbers of people who relocated from Semipalatinsk. However,
Najibullah and Bestayeva estimated that Kurchatov (Semipalatinsk region) has only a
population of 10,000 while 50,000 people used to live there before the catastrophe
(Najibullah, Bestayeva “Slow death in Kazakhstan’s land of nuclear test,” 2011).
According to Julian Agyeman and Yuliya Ogneva-Himmelberger, environmental
situations have improved in many places: Chernobyl has been somewhat cleaned up, the
North Aral Sea refilled with water; the Semipalatinsk nuclear testing site was closed after
17
Kazakhstan stopped housing nuclear weapons. The authors claim that today’s environmental
problems are related to the development of oil, gas, diamonds in Sakha, forests, climate
change, and so on. Those who live near these development sites in Sakhalin (Russia), Atyrau,
and Aktau (Kazakhstan) suffer from environmental degradation and experience their standard
of living dropping, while people living in capitals or foreign investors continue to earn their
profits (Agyeman, Ogneva-Himmelberger, 2009. p. 23).
It is a challenging task to find a causal relationship between environmental problems
and sex trafficking in the FSU in terms of academic research in the field of climate refugees
from the FSU and human trafficking which is considered an unusual pattern of sex-
trafficking. Another concern is that there is a lack of data reports on migration flows from the
Aral Sea region, Chernobyl, and Semipalatinsk by IOM, ILO, or other international
organizations. However, I will attempt to build a hypothesis around environmental
catastrophes in the FSU which led to poverty, health, and climatic problems so women
became vulnerable to traffickers.
4. Weak governance and the lack of legal protection.
There are international standards that measure sex trafficking globally and they are
drafted and supported by the UN, the US, and international organizations that emphasize the
need for international cooperation. But in the end, governments are the ones who deal with
the sex trafficking problem individually. According to the United Nations Development
Program (UNDP), governance is described as,
[T]he exercise of economic, political, and administrative authority to manage a
country’s affairs at all levels. It comprises mechanisms, processes, and institutions
through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights,
meet their obligations and mediate their differences (UNDP, 2002, p. 36).
18
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) defined governance as, “all aspects of the
way a country is governed, including its economic policies and regulatory framework. Good
governance does not include abuse and corruption and with due regard for the rule of law”
(IMF, “Factsheet. IMF and good governance,” 2020). The World Bank describes good
governance with six dimensions that include “voice and accountability, political stability and
absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of
corruption” (World Bank, 2009, p. 3).
According to academic definitions of governance, Pierre and Peters argue that state
and society are both involved in governance which includes “a common set of priorities for
society, coherence, steering, accountability.” The main actors include “political actors and
institutions, interest groups, civil society, non-governmental and transnational organizations”
(J. Pierre, G. Peters, 2005, p. 3-5). Megan Crookham also claims that governance consists of
government, civil society, and private sector that have interdependence on each other
(Crookham, 2004, p. 9). Shabeer Cheema agrees about the “interrelation of institutions
through which people regulate their interests, learn about their human rights and obligations
about society” (Cheema, 2005, p. 11).
There is uncertainty in the research on anti-sex trafficking and levels of governance
especially in developing countries that do not exercise democracy and good governance.
However, in this thesis, I use the annual report Trafficking In Persons Reports (TIP) by the
US Department of State which is considered as “the most comprehensive worldwide reports
on governments’ efforts to combat severe forms of trafficking in persons” (TIP, U.S.
Department of State, 2009). TIP is structured to identify the level of anti-trafficking efforts of
a particular country, its democracy, legal code, and level of corruption, and practicing the
basic human rights principles. All nations are divided by tiers showing the level of minimum
standards of the TVPA. With that being said, my three selected countries in TIP 2020 –
19
Russia which is in tier 3 does not fully comply with minimum standards and do not take steps
to do so; both Ukraine and Kazakhstan are in Tier 2 meaning these nations have taken steps
to comply but are not in full compliance (TIP 2020, US Department of State). Governments
that are not making efforts to combat sex-trafficking might be sanctioned by the US,
including withdrawal of certain aid (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 393). So it is assumed that
countries are interested in combatting sex trafficking which will be found in my further
discussions of country profiles and the following comparative analysis.
The post-Soviet countries, in general, do not have a functional legal system which
leads to the rise of sex trafficking. The Russian democratic government inherited criminal
laws from the legal code of the Soviet Union which did not prohibit sex trafficking.
Moreover, sex trafficking had never been recognized in the legal code in order to prosecute
traffickers. Thus, victims little or no legal protection (Tverdova, 2011, p. 334).
The poor performance of law enforcement is another barrier that deters the
prosecution of not only sex-trafficking but also other crimes. Lauren McCarthy argues that
investigation and prosecution in Russia are strictly separated which creates a gap and
confusion, so no one wants to take responsibility for a case and see it through to completion.
She defines this process as a complicated system of career advancement which leads law
enforcement staff to fear learning something new or unfamiliar to them. Dealing with sex
trafficking presents learning challenging and complex techniques, especially dealing with
witnesses who are also victims (McCarthy, 2009, p. 6).
Scholars and policymakers have identified causes for poor performance, but
corruption is on the top of the list in the FSU countries. Lucia Vreja also adds corruption,
lack of specialized personnel and equipment as contributing factors to the spread of sex
trafficking in Eastern Europe and the former USSR (Vreja, 2005, p. 55). As a general rule,
20
sex trafficking victims do not trust the police in the post-Soviet Union, knowing they are
corrupt and not interested in helping them.” (McCarthy, 2009, p. 16).
5. Corruption.
Corruption is defined as a criminal offense done by a person, group of people, or
authority organization to abuse power or illegally benefit for one’s private gain. Political
corruption is action in an official capacity for personal gain by an officer or governmental
employee. Corruption is practiced in kleptocracies, oligarchies, narco, and mafia states
(Sociology and criminology - Open Access Reports. One of the global initiatives of the UN
Sustainable Development Goal 16 is aimed to reduce corruption of all forms by 2030 (UN
Sustainable Goals, 2015). One of the important international anti-corruption documents is the
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Anti-Bribery Convention
which has a goal to reduce political corruption and corporate crimes in developing countries
by encouraging sanctions against bribery (OECD, 1997). Those countries that have signed the
convention have to put in place legislation criminalizing bribery by officials. The UN has an
international anti-corruption treaty called the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC)
2006 which has a broader scope than the OECD Convention including other types of
corruption such as money laundering and abuse of power (UNCAC, 2006). Interestingly
enough, Russia has signed and ratified both conventions, but barely applied them to the
country's laws which will be discussed further in the comparative analysis. As for Ukraine
and Kazakhstan, both of them signed and ratified the UN convention and their legislative
structures will be described later as well.
Corruption has been rooted in the government since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In the words of Boris Yeltsin “... the state has been hijacked by hitmen, racketeers, and
extortionists, that its corrupted politicians have brazenly amassed huge fortunes in bribes, and
21
that military men have shamelessly peddled weapons – from Kalashnikovs to nuclear missiles
– for the right price” (De Mauro, 2016, p. 31). From Yeltsin to Putin and Nazarbayev there
was no legal definition of corruption in the FSU back in the 1990s. All members of Duma
(Parliament in Russia) and Ak Orda (Federal Parliament in Kazakhstan) and other
government officials have immunity (Hughes, 2000, p. 14). They are in the top 10 most
corrupt countries in the world by surveys of the European Bank of Reconstruction and
Development (EBRD “Working paper,” 2020). Robert Legvold defined the legislative system
of the FSU as a systemic corruption where it becomes the rule rather than the exception
(Legvold cited by Rotberg, 2009, p. 197). I would add that it also becomes a part of the
culture and mentality.
Rusev and De Mauro described three categories of corruption in the former USSR -
organized crime, “petty corruption” and administrative corruption. “Petty'' corruption is
accepting small bribes; administrative corruption is extracting kickbacks from service
operators in the border area (De Mauro 2016, p. 35). All these types are controlled by
organized crime in Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Lucia Vreja also addressed the issue of
corruption by border control officers, police, and the security staff in railroad and bus routes.
Employees in airports and railroad stations turn a “blind eye” when they get a significant
amount of money from traffickers (Vreja, 2004, p. 55). Moreover, some policemen and
government officials run their trafficking networks. The old Georgian passport is extremely
easy to falsify, the photo can be changed and the passport can be used for multiple entries.
This type of passport costs only $400. In 2003, visa services companies were involved in the
assistance of smuggling people and trafficking for prostitution (Traughber, 2007, p. 58).
Other reasons for corrupt law enforcement officials to intervene in sex-trafficking are due to
low salaries at the government agencies and corruption is a bonus to their income; and also a
fear of reprisals by organized criminal groups (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 390).
22
Lauren McCarthy identifies corruption as an “underlying root cause and a facilitating
tool” for sex trafficking, ensuring that it “remains a low-risk, high-profit crime” in Russia.
“Corrupt officials can be involved in falsifying passports and investigators, prosecutors and
judges can be bought in the process of the criminal investigation” (McCarthy, 2009, p. 10). In
Russia and Kazakhstan, corruption happens also when a brothel owner sends women to the
so-called “subbotnik” where women spend a day with police officers. Women are forced into
prostitution by traffickers due to low trust in the legal system in Russia after being raped by
policemen or having them as clients (Tverdova, 2011, p. 334).
All factors described above lined up with a pattern of organized criminal groups that
trap vulnerable women and force them into prostitution abroad. As shown in the next part of
the chapter, sex trafficking flows and organized crime are closely linked.
Sex trafficking and its links with Organized Crime (the Russian mafia).
One of the modalities of organized crime is a type of transnational, national, and local
groups run by criminal authorities in the illegal activity of selling drugs and weapons,
services of prostitution, gambling, money laundering, etc. (Britannica dictionary, “Organized
crime”). Gangs are often referred to as a mafia, a criminal organization that operates “black
markets” in the so-called “underworld” (Oxford dictionaries, “The mafia). The Russian mafia
(discussed in this chapter), the Italian mafia (Sicilian Mafia), the Japanese Yakuza, Mexican
cartels are involved in sex trafficking operations and forced prostitution due to the large
profits and low risks. (De Mauro, 2017, p. 9). In 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice journal
stated: “Since the end of the Cold War, organized crime groups from Russia, China, Italy,
Nigeria, and Japan have increased their international presence and worldwide networks or
have become involved in more transnational criminal activities. Most of the world's major
international organized crime groups are present in the United States" (Ott, “Responding to
23
the threat of international organized crime: a primer on programs, profiles, and practice
points,” 2012).
In 2000, the UN created a multilateral treaty against organized crime “The United
Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC, also called “Palermo
Convention”) which obliges member states to combat against organized crime internationally
and protects the rights of migrants, women, children and those who smuggled as forced labor
(UNTOC, 2000). The Convention has three protocols that target activities of organized
groups: the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially
Women and Children; the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea, and Air;
and the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts
and Components and Ammunition (UNTOC, 2018). Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine signed
and ratified the Convention and all three protocols but all three countries have weak policies
and laws to combat transnational crime. Additionally, the Russian mafia has close ties with
government officials and oligarchs which will be discussed in this part of the chapter.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the main economic centers of the region are
Kazakhstan and Russia as oil and gas exporters. Ukraine is an economic hub linked to the
EU. They all have suffered from economic, social, and political struggles after the collapse
of the Soviet Union (Kempadoo and Doezema; Truong; White cited by Bloch, 2003, p. 152).
Particularly organized crime, the so-called “the Russian mafia,” has powerful syndicates
affecting national life in many aspects. Especially in Russia and Ukraine the relationships
between organized crime and sex trafficking “have a deep connection that represents a
dangerous group of people who are rich, powerful and have connections in a high lobby”
(Mossbarger, p. 34, 2007). The Russian mafia is an umbrella of criminal activities that does
not necessarily mean “Russian” but refers to a variety of Eurasian criminal groups that have
24
appeared after the collapse of the Soviet Union and share common cultural and linguistic
backgrounds (De Mauro 2016, p. 9).
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the principles of rule of law and accountability
have not been institutionalized but instead, organized crime has become the dominant
economic and political force that has prevented the development of democratic institutions
(Shelley, 1999, p. 4). In 1998, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia estimated 40% of
private businesses and 60% of state-owned companies and commercial banks were controlled
by gangs of organized crime. (Jensen, 1998, p. 33). Today 30-40% of Russia’s GDP is
controlled by organized crime groups through money laundering, investment “chill” (fear of
having money taken by organized crime), bank fraud, and tax evasion (De Maruo, 2016, p.
28). The Ministry of Internal Affairs in Russia reported 8,000 criminal gangs in the FSU that
operate domestically and 300 of them internationally. According to NGOs, this is just the tip
of the iceberg (Vlachova, 2005, p. 5). Alla Aristova, the Head of Crime Prevention of Saratov
Department of Internal Affairs, confirmed that the most profitable income of the Russian
mafia is sexual exploitation of women and transporting drugs (G. Dunn, 2000, p. 65).
According to Michael Platzer of the Academic Council on the United Nations System
(ACUNS): “The white slave trade earns a big amount of money for criminal groups in
Eastern Europe” (R.P. Paringaux, 1998, p. 17).
Lucia Vreja also refers to the existence of a developed “black market” run by criminal
groups that had appeared in the 1990s due to the corruption of state structures. People that
work in exporting goods can easily become traffickers in persons because they know the
routes and networks with low risks (Vreja, 2004, p. 52). A trafficker or pimp can easily send
a woman abroad with a tourist visa but if the number of women is high the gangs need false
passports to transport women. In this case, “big operations” are supported by corrupt officials
that have their share of benefits. Once the forced labor arrives in a foreign country, Russian-
25
Ukrainian organized crime groups operate through extortion schemes among local networks
in a destination country. Those “locals'' get a share of payments in stocks that give them
control over this business (Hughes, 2000, p. 18-19).
Luisse Shelley stated that thieves-in-law (“vory v zakone”) left their countries of
origin to go to Russia or abroad in the 1990s due to the possibilities of getting rich due to the
large scale of Russian privatization. While mafia groups maintain links to their homelands
many of them have chosen to concentrate on global criminal activities (Shelley, 1999, p. 4).
The Russian mafia operates in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Balkans, and the US and it has
been involved in the sex trafficking so-called “fourth wave of human trafficking” (previous
three were Thai and Filipino women, Dominicans and Colombians, Ghanaians and Nigerians)
after the collapse of the Soviet Union (De Mauro, 2016, p. 1).
Another dimension is how traffickers developed victim dependence based on a fear of
adapting to a new reality. According to Marie Vlachova, psychological dependence on
traffickers is due to the fact that victims are not familiar with a foreign language and laws of a
destination country which makes it easier to control the victims (Vlachova, 2005, p. 9).
Trafficking Routes.
Russia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine among all other post-Soviet countries were chosen
for analysis due to their unique geographical locations that serve as hubs, transit routes, and
the export and import of women in the international sex trade. It is not easy to map the
trafficking routes and to find out how many people are trafficked due to the confidential
nature of organized crime activities. Anthony De Mauro argues that in order to know about
trafficking routes it is better to learn about businesses in foreign countries with known ties to
the Russian mafia. It is easier to hide women in buildings that are free from police scrutiny
26
(De Mauro, 2016, p. 44). So his suggestion is to go after Russian mafia businesses instead of
going after victims due to connection of sex trafficking flow and organized crime.
Russia has become one of the largest exporters of women abroad and a transit route
between Asia, Middle East and Europe due to its unique geographical location, the distance
to move trafficking women is shorter compared to other large scale human trafficking
operations (De Mauro, 2016, p. 42). Women victims from Moldova, Ukraine, and Central
Asian countries are transported to Russia before they reach the Balkans, Western Europe,
China, Japan, South Korea, and the US. Armenians are transported through Russia to the
United Arab Emirates (U.A.E) (Tverdova, 2011, p. 334). Through the Baltic route of
Lithuania, women are trafficked from the Caucasus (Russia) to the Mediterranean, as well as
through Egypt to Israel, the UAE, and Bahrain (Protection Project “Human Rights Report on
TIP,” 2008). Russia has been a country of destination for Uzbeks, Turkmens, and Kyrgyz
people where they are enslaved due to the illegal immigration status in the country
(Tverdova, 2011, p. 334). Another notorious route is China - Siberia since 1992 due to an
open border policy that allows Chinese citizens with connections to organized crime to send
Chinese women via Moscow and Prague to Germany (De Maruo, 2016, p. 43). Northeast
Asia and Central Africa are other large destinations of Russian victims reported by the US
Department of State (TIP Report, US Department of State, p. 430). According to Tatiana
Busuncian “Western channel” that is used for illegal immigration also used for sex trafficking
of Russian women from Russia via Moldova and Romania and Hungary to Western countries
(Busuncian, 2006, p. 83).
Kazakhstan is Central Asia’s hub for sex trafficking activities to Russia, The United
Arab Emirates, Turkey, and Greece. Most of the victims are coming from Uzbekistan,
Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan (“Kazakhstan as Human Trafficking Route”, 2011). Women from
Kazakhstan are being trafficked for sexual exploitation to the UAE, Azerbaijan, Turkey,
27
Israel, Greece, Brazil, Germany, and the US (TIP Report 2020, US Department of State, p.
299). E. Badikova also adds other routes of sex trafficking from Kazakhstan to Israel, South
Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and more rarely Western Europe (Badikova, 2005, p. 30)
Ukraine has been a major hub and has access to the EU. According to T. Busuncian,
the “Western channel” is used for illegal immigration from Ukraine through Moldova and
Romania and Hungary to Western Europe (Busuncian, 2007, p. 83). The US Department of
State reported that women from Ukraine are sexually exploited in the EU, China, Central
Asia, Southeast Asia, the US, Canada, the UK, Middle East, Africa (TIP Report 2020, US
Department of State, p. 515).
28
Chapter Three: Country profiles. Comparative analysis.
In this chapter, I turn to a description of the selected countries’ profiles on the basis of
the push factors identified above. An analysis of prosecution and investigation actions is
undertaken based on TIP 2001 - 2019, the legal codes and police reports of Russia,
Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Social and economic factors will be analyzed by gross domestic
product (GDP) per capita using purchasing power parity (PPP), inflation and unemployment
rates by country.
Kazakhstan.
The Republic of Kazakhstan is located in the middle of Central Asia with a population
of 18.2 million people composed of Kazakhs, Russians, and others. Kazakhstan was a part of
both the Russian Empire from the 1860s and the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1991, therefore,
adopting not only the Russian language and culture but also the constitutional and legal
systems from its neighbor. In terms of its position within the international community, its
political path after the collapse of communism has been stable under the leadership of
Nursultan Nazarbayev. The ethnic diversity of the country has not resulted in armed conflict
and the economy has been prosperous due to the abundance of natural resources (Snajdr,
2013, p. 247).
Kazakhstan is a source, transit, and destination country of sex trafficking as described
in the previous chapter. Kazakhstani women are trafficked to the U.A.E, Azerbaijan, Qatar,
Turkey, Israel, Greece, Russia, Germany, Brazil, and the USA (US Department of State, TIP
Report 2020). According to the US Department of State Report, the government of
Kazakhstan does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of
trafficking, but it is making significant efforts to do so. This part of the chapter will examine
29
selected five factors as key patterns of sex trafficking flow from Kazakhstan to foreign
countries.
1. Economic factors and Poverty level.
Measures of poverty are mostly based on reports of income, consumption, welfare
defining “absolute” and “relative poverty” levels in Kazakhstan. According to the UNDP,
measuring the poverty rate in transition economies such as the Former Soviet Union (FSU)
and Yugoslavia is too complex to be captured in a single universal indicator. In 2000, the
World Bank proposed an absolute poverty line of PPP$2.15 a day; and daily spending of
PPP$4.30 for education and healthcare for the FSU and European countries (UNDP, 2009, p.
3). In this chapter, I will attempt to measure poverty rates based on the IMF and the World
Bank reports of income GDP per capita based on PPP, percentages of the inflation rate, and
unemployment in Kazakhstan.
Kazakhstan links the large markets of China and South Asia with those of Russia and
Western Europe. According to the World Bank, the country had transitioned from lower-
middle-income to upper-middle-income in 20 years. Since 2002, GDP per capita had risen six
times and the poverty level became lower than it used to be in the 1990s. Today it shares the
World Bank’s “indicator of shared prosperity” (World Bank “The World Bank in
Kazakhstan. Overview,” 2019). However, it has not been like this before. The collapse of the
Soviet Union resulted in a sharp breakdown of the economy in the 1990s when people found
that their incomes were dropping below the poverty line while the elites enjoyed the imported
goods which they had the access to and ability to travel abroad. In that period, the Central
Asian republics, which includes Kazakhstan, and the Caucasus showed extreme poverty rates
(UNDP, 2009, p. 5). The cumulative loss of incomes between 1991-2001 was equivalent to
three years of GDP per capita of the former Soviet Union (World Bank, 2005, p. 78).
30
In the late 1990s, the majority of poor (70%) lived in families where one or two
members were unemployed. The UNDP described the FSU poverty determinants as,
Locational (urban-rural) factors are important determinants of poverty levels in
former Soviet republics: poverty rates in rural areas during the last ten years have
generally been well above those in urban areas. Poverty in rural areas also concerns
issues of access to quality education, health care, and other social services. Poverty
levels in medium-sized and small towns—particularly in “company towns” where
local economies rely heavily on small numbers of large companies that were products
of the Soviet system—are likewise often well above rates reported for larger cities
(UNDP, 2009, p. 8).
The gender dimensions of poverty in Kazakhstan are higher than in Russia, Belarus,
Ukraine, and Moldova (World Bank, 2005, p. 136). The cut in social services in the 1990s
has affected women who were concerned about access to education, healthcare, and childcare
for their children (UNDP, 2009, p. 9). With that being said the early and late 1990s were
socially and financially unstable times when women did not have the access to jobs, schools,
healthcare, and childcare which led to migration to Western countries and made them
vulnerable to smuggling and trafficking.
In 1995, the government shifted the economy to privatization, resulting in it gaining
the status of a “the market economy country” status by the EU and the US by 2000
(Vakulchuk, 2014, p. 8). In the 2000s, the new era of economic prosperity in Kazakhstan
started when the country began to export oil, grain, and metals resulting in GDP per capita
PPP growth by 10.6% in 2006 from 1.7% in 1999 (IMF, “Country Data. Kazakhstan,” 2021).
According to the World Bank’s report on poverty rate, Kazakhstan’s headcount ratio at
national poverty lines significantly dropped from 46.7% to 2.3% between 2001 and 2019
(World Bank “Databank 2001-2019. Kazakhstan”).
31
After such a drastic change in the economy, the country experienced high inflation
rates and a drop in oil prices due to the Ukrainian crisis with the annexation of Crimea in
2014. The interdependency with its neighbor’s political situation led to the country’s
currency devaluation by 19% in 2014 and by 22% in 2015 (Financial Times “Kazakhs battle
to stave off chill in from Russian steppe,” 2014). The Ukrainian crisis created a chain
reaction to the FSU states that shared a trade union system and sanctions imposed on Russia,
which indirectly led to unemployment, poverty, and high inflation rates in Kazakhstan (See
table 1).
Table 1. Economic indicators of Kazakhstan in 2001 - 2019 by IMF.
Year GDP per capita (in US dollars PPP)
Inflation rate (in percent)
Unemployment rate (in percentage)
2001 9,168 8.4% 10.4%
2002 10,211 5.9% 9.3%
2003 11,318 6.5% 8.8%
2004 12,642 6.9% 8.4%
2005 14,178 7.5% 8.1%
2006 15,991 8.6% 7.8%
2007 17,677 10.8% 7.3%
2008 18,140 17.1% 6.6%
2009 18,245 7.3% 6.6%
2010 19,530 7.1% 5.8%
2011 21,129 8.3% 5.4%
2012 22,278 5.1% 5.3%
2013 23,644 5.8% 5.2%
2014 24,734 6.7% 5.0%
2015 24,940 6.7% 5.0%
32
2016 25,167 14.6% 5.0%
2017 26,252 7.4% 5.0%
2018 27,390 6.9% 5.0%
2019 29,147 6.2 4.8%
Another poverty dimension is the complex form of regional poverty disparity. On one
hand, the government is underdeveloped in rural areas resulting in a disproportionate
distribution of poverty. On the other hand, there is a glamorous lifestyle in the capital
Nursultan and the major commercial city Almaty, and in the oil and gas-rich parts of the
country. The former president of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev described this
phenomenon as:
[P]olarization acquired a graphic manifestation in the relations established between
the city and the countryside. In both cases, we witness a global process of social
differentiation with the gap there between growing steadily. Within the nearest
decade the country-side must become a priority area from the point of view of giving
an additional impetus to market transformations, to an emphatic settlement of social
problems and development of infrastructure.
[W]e are to expect considerable rejection of a free labor force in the country-side,
significant migration to the city from the country-side and ever developing processes
of urbanization. The country-side of today has become an epitome of major social
problems: nonpayment of wages and pensions, backwardness, poverty and
unemployment, poor ecology, poor infrastructure, education and health care.
Meanwhile, the country-side manifests the highest demographic potential” (Simai
2006, p. 17 citing Embassy of Kazakhstan document, Feb. 2005).
33
This phenomenon can be applied to any country of the FSU which was created as a
result of inequality in the social system not only during the transition but way before that.
Meghan Sinai characterizes the social system of the FSU as meritocratic which had roles in
the party or state hierarchy, “the degree of their control over the allocation of resources and in
decision making” (Sinai, 2006, p. 14). Even so-called “nomenclature” (key administrative
positions in the FSU and Eastern bloc) had differences in “status” but also the access to
certain goods and services. When it comes to the top political elite, leaders, and top managers
of state-owned enterprises, they had not only the control of the distribution of goods but also
enjoyed a higher status in society. Today’s Kazakhstan inherited this system from the Soviet
Union where winners climbed to wealth during the transformation period while losers lost
their social and economic positions. Sinai argued that old pensioners, less educated, people
from rural regions, and women, in general, were among the “losers” who suffered from the
inequality and still do so (Sinai, 2006, p.14-15). As in Russia, the first groups of wealthy
businessmen and oligarchs formed in Kazakhstan after the collapse of the USSR by buying
industries at low prices in mining, construction, oil and gas sectors. Kazakhs oligarchs own
80% of privatized national companies, especially the former president Nazarbayev’s family
(Peyrouse, 2016, p. 350).
After all, in the transition period of the 1990s, women of the FSU experienced deep
poverty and inequality in the social system that pushed them to job hunting abroad making
them vulnerable to traffickers. Talking of the prosperous era of Kazakhstan of the 2000s,
women from rural areas where poverty is still on a higher level can be vulnerable to sexual
exploitation.
34
2. Social and cultural factors.
Back in the Soviet era, Central Asia has been called “an astonishing ethnic mosaic” as
the result of resettlements of ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Germans, Greeks, Crimean Tatars,
Koreans during World War II, Stalin’s repressions, and due to Soviet policies of sending
professionals to work in Central Asia. For some reason, after the USSR collapsed some
ethnic groups moved back to Russia, their “historic motherland” or abroad, but the rest
decided to stay in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan.
According to Saltanat Sulaimanova, push factors of migration of “non-titular populations”
from Central Asia included “ethnic motives, economic motives, uncertainty about the future
and desire to provide a better future for children, isolation from Russia, anti-democratic
regimes, social and political instability, poor ecological conditions, criminal situations, and
other personal motives (family unification, health problems, desire/need for a different
climate, etc)” (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 379). As of 2018, Kazakhs are 60% of the population
of Kazakhstan, and other ethnic groups are representing 40% with the ethnic Russian
dominance among them. Though ethnic tensions between Russians and Kazakhs have not
been violent, most Russians left the country due to a lack of job positions and they believed
that ethnic Kazakhs were being privileged over ethnic Russians in the new economy. For
example, Russians can not get government jobs. The majority of Russian women who
decided to stay in the country were discriminated against by their ethnicity which led to low-
paid jobs so they became prostitutes and vulnerable to sex trafficking abroad (Snajdr, 2013,
p. 249). Saima Kayani also argued that ethnic conflicts and hate pushed Slavs to move back
to Russia or abroad (Kayani, 2018, p. 107). TIP and other international reports do not specify
the ethnicities of victims from Kazakhstan that are trafficked abroad, but based on the
literature review, I hypothesize that ethnic motives of non-titular groups due to discrimination
by ethnicity is one of social and cultural factors that has to be argued.
35
Traditional patriarchal norms, stereotypes, and a high level of violence against women
in Kazakhstan is another dimension of inequalities and discriminations. According to UN
surveys, 30% of Kazakhstani women aged 18-75 had experienced physical and sexual abuse,
and 25% psychological abuse (UN Women Report, 2018, p. 14-18). As for career
opportunities and wage imbalances, women earned 30-35% less than men in 2012-2016; held
10% of political civil positions and 20% of seats in Parliament and executive banking jobs
(Ministry of National Economy of Kazakhstan. Committee on Statistics Report 2012-2016).
Nevertheless, Kazakhstan ratified all international treaties such as UN Convention on
Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination (CEDAW), the Beijing Declaration and Platform
for Action, The Convention on the Political Rights of Women, the Convention on the
Nationality of Married Women, six ILO conventions and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development (SDGs) ranking 52nd of 144 countries on the 2018 WEF Global Gender Gap
Index. However, while joining legal agreements have grown in the last decade, gender
inequality was significantly high in the 1990s.
Another important dimension to be described is how Kazakhs actively returned to their
traditions and religious practices in the 1990s which were prohibited during communism.
Soviet policies promoted gender equality, a secular way of life, atheism, and a pro-science
way of thinking. However, after the collapse of the USSR, traditional culture was mostly
practiced in rural areas rather than in urban cities which are considered as more diverse,
secular, modern, and open. One of these “Kazakh” practices is bride abductions (or bride
kidnappings) which are mostly done against the will of a woman who automatically turns into
a victim. If a woman decides to return home after kidnapping her parents and relatives will
abandon her. Some of these women are under 18 years old (Conway “Bride Abductions in
Kazakhstan and Human Trafficking Discourse: Tradition vs Moral Acuity,” 2018). UN
Women website identifies a bride kidnapping as:
36
…involves taking a female without her consent for the purpose of forcing her to
marry one of her captors. Perpetrators may use psychological coercion or physical
force, including rape, to force the woman or girl into marriage. As with other forms of
forced marriage, the key elements are: the taking of a woman or girl; an absence of
her consent; for the purpose of marriage (UN Women, Legislation, 2011)
As for the return to a religion, “traditional roles” for women were promoted by
politicians, mass media which is interpreted by many as an attempt to “drive women out of
the labor force and higher education.” Some men secretly practice polygamous marriage
which is not legalized by the law (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 388).
Women’s social status is dramatically declining due to traditional male chauvinism,
polygamy, underage marriages, domestic violence, unemployment, under wage salaries
creating situations for sex trafficking abroad. Additionally, naivete and romanticizing the
Western glamorous lifestyle due to isolation from the world for more than 70 years, as
described in Chapter two can also be applied here as social and psychological aspects of push
factors.
3. Environmental problems.
The environmental problems of Kazakhstan are diverse and specific to certain areas.
The most significant ones are related to radiation, desertification, salinization, pollution, soil
erosion, climate change, and sand storms. The surface of the country is 57% uninhabited,
unexploited land so-called “steppe” (flat unforested grassland), 23% agricultural lands, and
5% water. As discussed previously, Kazakhstan is the only Central Asian country to
overcome the Soviet planned economy and establish market relations. However, despite the
economic success, there are certain regions in the country under the low poverty line,
37
problems of food, health, water, education, jobs, and public transportation (Anand, 2013, p.
3080).
There were two massive environmental catastrophes that affected the lives of
millions, pushing them to internal migration and migration abroad. The desertification and
desiccation of the Aral Sea is the first catastrophe discussed in this section. The world’s
fourth largest lake, the Aral Sea, has already been disappearing due to unsustainable cotton
cultivation by the Soviet Union in the 1990s. Experts believe that the Aral Sea catastrophe
has displaced more than 130,000 people and affected more than 5 million people’s health,
who used to work in the fishing and canning industry. This led to high infant and maternal
mortality (Thompson, “The Aral Sea Crisis,” 2008).
Another concern about health problems in the region is how people have to adapt to a
change in the climate. Rama Kumar stated that climate change does not necessarily affect
people’s health and spread any diseases, but it makes life harder due to long hot summers
with dry air. Since people stay at home for longer periods, they spread diseases to other
people (Kumar, 2002, p. 3801). In my personal opinion, changing temperatures affect
people’s immune systems which might lead to infectious diseases. Saima Kayani argues
about climatic changes in Central Asia particularly in Kazakhstan that lead to depletion of
water sources, over-farming the land, increase in temperature, lower rainfalls, food insecurity
(Kayani, 2018, p. 102).
Apart from epidemiological and climate change concerns, there is also a lack of health
infrastructure, medication, and equipment so health professionals do not have access to do
their jobs in the region. They are required to meet international health protocols and standards
in treating people and improving health services including diagnostics and essential
medications but due to the absence of all that, they have to send people with diseases caused
by the environment to big cities (Small et al, 2001, p. 547-548). In the late 1990s, Kazakh
38
people who were harmed by the Aral Sea catastrophe sent their children to a rehabilitation
center in Almaty where clinical findings included skin lesions, heart and kidney disease
(Waehler, Dietrichs, 2017, p. 1).
The second environmental disaster is the Semipalatinsk Test Site Polygon, which
served as a nuclear testing station of the Soviet Union. As it was described in Chapter two,
80% of the population from 1950 to 1990 had genetic mutations, breathing problems, tissue-
related problems, cancer, eye infection are common in minisatellite regions (Bauer et al,
2005, p. 412). These tests created small and big atomic lakes in which radioactive gas
emissions spread into land and air creating environmental and health problems. Moreover,
they affected not only people’s health but also agriculture, ecosystems, rivers, landscape and
socio-economic conditions that led to a massive migration (Anand, 2013, p. 3080).
Since Kazakhstan is rich in natural resources, there are areas like Kashagan and
Tengiz where production emits huge amounts of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, methane,
carbon monoxide, benzene, and hydrogen fluorides. Local people have health problems such
as cerebral circulation dysfunction, respiratory problems (like asthma, chest pain, choking,
bronchitis, coughing), heart attacks, cancer, birth defects, headaches, eye problems, nausea,
skin irritations, and vomiting (Anand, 2013, p. 3080)
According to experts, there is a complex interconnection of environmental factors with
social and economic issues (Anand, 2013, p. 3080). Environmental degradation made it
impossible to earn a healthy wage for proper survival in affected regions in Kazakhstan. Poor
community life, unemployment, no access to healthcare services in rural areas created a
pattern for internal migration and migration abroad. Saltanat Sulaimanova argued that over
200,000 people from the Aral Sea region and 160,000 from Semipalatinsk were forced to
leave their homelands turning to internally displaced persons (IDPs) (Sulaimanova, 2006, p.
381). I would also add that IDPs might lead to migration and job huntings abroad. Yearly
39
around 7,600 to 8,530 females immigrated abroad between 2000 and 2013 (UN, “Migration
Profiles. Kazakhstan”). People who migrate have their own motives closely associated with
socio-economic changes, economic instability, political transformation, ethnic conflicts,
cultural identity, environmental and ecological factors (Anand, 2013, p. 3081). Saima Kayani
adds more patterns to the list such as water management issues, divergences overuse of
natural resources, environmental security, and border management (Kayani, 2018, p. 107).
With that being said, environmental problems as a part of economic issues, health problems
and socio-economic insecurities lead women to be trafficked abroad.
4. Weak governance and the lack of legal protection.
Along with economic and social prosperity in Kazakhstan’s transition and recovery
after the collapse of the USSR, the evolution of standards for the elimination of trafficking
were improving from 2001 to 2019. However, some problems remain unsolved in the
government’s passive position in identifying sex trafficking as a serious problem: untrained
law enforcement, corrupt government officials, and their ties with the mafia. All this will be
described in this part of the chapter.
Saima Kayani argues that human trafficking was triggered in Kazakhstan due to bad
governance, poverty, an authoritative and oppressive regime, the non-transparent judicial
system, absence of rule of law, and corrupt law enforcement (Kayani, 2018, p. 106).
According to the TIP Report of the US Department of State, the country moved from
the lowest position of Tier 3 to Tier 2 and recognized trafficking as a problem (TIP Report
Archives 2001-2019, US Department of State).
Edward Snajdr argued that there was a problem in documenting sex trafficking cases
when he visited Kazakhstan along with colleagues from the US Department of State and the
International Organization for Migration (IOM) to conduct training for police officers. The
40
government officials were in shock when they found out there were 5000 documented cases
in 2001 reported by IOM while the government was investigating only 53 cases. He also
admitted that interviewed police officers’ prioritized investigation task was illegal drugs due
to the fact that it was a massive problem in the post-Soviet transition period while sex
trafficking was left aside (Snajdr, 2013, p. 249). Another concern was local people, mass
media and police officers had a problem with identifying sex trafficking as a criminal activity
and that sexual exploitation was a violation of human rights. Some of the officers asked
‘‘How can you stop a woman from leaving a poor village to work the streets of Almaty?’’
Then they concluded that ‘‘if a woman wants to do it, to travel abroad, it is difficult to call
this exploitation. We call these people “adventurers” (Snajdr, 2013, p. 249).
Source: TIP Report by the US Department of State
Prosecution.
In 2002-2006, the government demonstrated some modest progress in its law
enforcement, even though convicted traffickers regularly received suspended sentences and
did not serve any time in prison. However, the Border Guard Service trained passport control
officers to screen for potential victims entering the country at Kazakhstan's 150 official points
of entry. The government cooperated on trafficking investigations with the U.A.E, Turkey,
41
Uzbekistan, Tajikistan (TIP, 2002-2006, US Department of State). However, in 2003-2004,
no funds were made available to assist the country and Kazakhstan was demoted from Tier 2
to Tier 3 and described as ‘‘limited by lack of resources, police corruption and difficulty
monitoring its borders’’ (Snajdr, 2013, p. 251). Katerina Badikova admitted the difficulty to
prosecute all involved in sex trafficking networks (from the mafia, pimps, exploiters to
corrupt officials). Law enforcement agencies charge criminals on separate charges
individually, so it is difficult to prosecute the entire network (Badikova, 2005, p. 30).
Another dimension is that there is no legal definition of the term “exploitation” in the
criminal code of Kazakhstan. As a result, the term is interpreted by judges individually which
can be different from the minimal standards of the UN Convention Against Transnational
Organized Crime (UNTOC) Protocol. For example, there were cases when women
voluntarily left the country by job offers from abroad but have been sexually exploited
against their will. Later on, victims confessed that they were aware that they might have to
engage in prostitution in order to pay back the transportation arrangement. These types of
cases look confusing in terms of interpreting the term of “exploitation” (Badikova, 2005, 32).
After the repatriation of victims, the government did not provide victim services.
Instead trafficked victims are jailed for prostitution abroad or labor violations, and there were
no investigations of their situation when they are returned home (TIP, 2002, US Department
of State). Sadly to say victims of sex trafficking turned to be criminals once they reached
their home country.
Katerina Badikova described a difficulty in the legal system of Kazakhstan that does
not actively prosecute transnational network activities once victims are out of the country,
which means they are outside the country’s jurisdiction where local laws do not apply
(Badikova, 2005, p. 35).
42
The situation has changed in 2007 when the government established that human
trafficking was an offence and adopted a national action plan to combat trafficking. Prior to
that, Article 128 of the criminal code (“recruitment of persons for the purpose of
exploitation”) and Article 133 (“trade in minors”) were used to prosecute some forms of
trafficking (UN Office of Drugs and Crime UNODC, 2006, p. 216). Later in 2008, the
country prohibited human trafficking for both labor and sexual exploitation in Articles 133,
125(3)(b), 126(3)(b), and 270 of its penal code “which prescribe penalties of up to 15 years’
imprisonment – penalties sufficiently stringent and commensurate with those prescribed for
other grave crimes, such as rape” (TIP, 2006-2008, US Department of State). According to
the US Department of State, the government of Kazakhstan demonstrated some progress in
its anti-trafficking law enforcement efforts over the reporting period of 2001-2019.
In 2010 - 2013, the police provided victim identification and trafficking investigation
training for 79 migration and criminal police, funded anti-trafficking training for officers in
law enforcement academies in Russia and Turkmenistan, and partnered with other foreign
governments to provide training to 1,141 Kazakhstani government officials. In 2010, the
police, in cooperation with foreign donors, provided training in trafficking investigation
techniques and victim identification procedures for 79 migration and criminal police officers
and provided training for Kazakhstani law enforcement officers in Mongolia, Russia, Qatar,
Turkey, Austria, the UAE, Belarus, and Armenia (TIP, 2010-2013, US Department of State).
In 2014, there were still cases of sexual exploitation where traffickers targeted young
girls and women of age 15-35 from rural areas luring them as waitresses, models, or nannies
in large cities. Government officials’ complicity in trafficking remained a serious but
unaddressed problem. The government identified a large number of victims but struggled to
identify victims proactively, despite the law enforcement training that they had undertaken.
43
While investigating crimes the government did not use a victim-centered approach and did
not provide long-term shelter assistance to victims (TIP, 2014, US Department of State).
In 2015, the judicial institute provided training sessions for 400 judges on the
protection of victims of sex trafficking. Additionally, the Ministry of Internal Affairs
conducted training courses on victim identification and investigative techniques for police
officers, the migration police, community police, and school inspectors (TIP, 2015, US
Department of State).
In 2016-2019, the government continued to progress in the penal code by prohibiting
all forms of sex and labor trafficking. However, these amendments in the penal code and
criminal code allow defendants to pay monetary compensation to a victim in exchange for
having the criminal case withdrawn. Moreover, the codes do not include the universal
definition of trafficking under international law which is missing “force, fraud, coercion” as
an important element of sex trafficking crime (TIP, 2016-2019, US Department of State).
5. Corruption.
Despite the enormous efforts in combating human trafficking by creating new laws
and upgrading existing ones, providing funds, protection, and assistance to victims and
educating law enforcement officers, corruption remains the stumbling block in the
development of Kazakhstan. In 2020, the country was ranked 94 among 180 countries with
scores of 38 out of 100 by the Global Corruption Perception Index (Transparency
International, “Country Data. Kazakhstan,” 2020). From 1999 to 2019 Kazakhstan scored
from 27 to 28 out of 100 on the Corruption Perception Index which is considered as a modest
improvement in reducing the corruption level in 20 years (Transparency International,
“Country Data. Kazakhstan”).
44
Facilitation, bribery, attempted corruption, extortion, money laundering, abuse of office
are illegal in any sector by the country’s Criminal Code, but corruption combating bodies are
ineffective and unreliable (Risk and Compliance Portal, “Kazakhstan Corruption Report,”
2020). There is the Law on the Fight Against Corruption which includes the crime of
corruption along with fraud committed by government officials. Moreover, there is a lifetime
ban for civil services staff if they are convicted of corruption including the loss of rank, title,
grade, and awards. Corruption charges are regularly applied to high-ranking officials who do
not support the ruling elite and the former President Nursultan Nazarbayev. Usually, these
types of charges are widely covered by local media placing the blame of corrupt officials on
the Parliament meetings (Risk and Compliance Portal, “Kazakhstan Corruption Report,”
2020). Kazakhstan ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and also
adopted an anti-corruption strategy for 2011-2015 and tasked the country’s Agency on
Fighting Economic and Corruption Crimes to coordinate its implementation ruled by
Financial Police (OECD, “OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central
Asia Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan,” 2011). Paradoxically, despite all these laws and
rules, corruption in Kazakhstan is entrenched in the judicial system, courts, police, customs,
public services, legislation and civil society. However, Saltanat Sulaimanova argues that
corrupt government officials in Kazakhstan have not only the motive to earn extra money
because of their low salaries, but also fear of threats by organized crime (Sulaimanova, 2006,
p. 390).
The following are instances of corrupt government groups that regulate trafficking
flow, provide victims protection, investigation, prosecution of traffickers and the mafia.
The first group includes border control and custom administration officials who take
bribes and operate beyond scrutiny. Irregular payments are common when people cross the
border whether it is within trading products or people (World Economic Forum, “Global
45
Enabling Trade Report,” 2014). Women travelling abroad to purchase goods to be resold in
their countries are usually harassed by custom officers who ask for bribes and offer jobs in
Russia, U.A.E, and Turkey (Sulaimanova, 2006, p. 380-381).
The second group involves courts that are controlled by the interests of the ruling
elite. According to public opinion, people do not trust the judicial system in the country and
hold extremely low expectations that justice is fairly and professionally dispensed in courts.
Even becoming a judge requires giving bribes to high-level officials and court administrators
(Freedom House, “Nations in Transit 2016: Europe and Eurasia Brace for Impact,” 2016).
The third group is law enforcement (police), the most important one due to their wide
duties to investigate and prosecute traffickers, protect and assist victims of sex trafficking.
But instead of taking on these responsibilities in a good way, they receive big pay-offs for the
trafficking of women from mafia groups (Kayani, 2018, p. 107). Corruption within the police
is a serious problem in the country as evidenced by public opinion polls (Risk and
Compliance Portal, “Kazakhstan Corruption Report,” 2020).
One of the reasons that Kazakhstan was persistently on Tier 2 of the TIP Report by the
US Department of State is due to corruption of law enforcement. In the reports of 2001, 2003,
2004, corruption was defined as a problem at many levels from the police to customs officials
for taking bribes, even though the government has been investigating cases where border
officials and police work with traffickers and mafia groups (TIP Reports, 2001, 2003, 2004,
US Department of State).
In 2006 and 2008, systemic corruption remained a serious problem because migration
officers, police, and border officials continued to accept bribes from traffickers (TIP, 2006,
2008, US Department of State). It was ridiculous how the government prosecuted the former
head of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Unit in Almaty who had ties with traffickers in 2008
(TIP, 2008, US Department of State).
46
In 2014, the Ministry of Internal Affairs investigated other cases where police officers
cooperated with traffickers and protected an organized criminal group that ran brothels in big
cities and sent women abroad (TIP, 2014, US Department of State).
In 2015-2019, NGOs regularly reported that traffickers bribed low-ranking police
officials to avoid charges, so police officers facilitated demoted sex trafficking crimes to
something else (with fewer years in prison).
With that being said, corruption remains a serious problem that is rooted in the
legislation system of Kazakhstan where sex trafficking is not in effect recognized as a
problem. Corrupt government officials who are part of the umbrella of sex trafficking created
an image of people who victims cannot trust or rely on. I think this is one of the reasons
trafficked victims have a fear of going back home, maybe even bigger than a fear of
traffickers.
In this part of the chapter, I identified the main problems in Kazakhstan such as
regional poverty disparity (poor social system in rural areas) an unequal pay rate; patriarchal
cultural traditions that weakened women’s role in the society; weak governance and
legislative system in prosecution of sex trafficking; and corrupt government officials who
have ties with traffickers and organized crime. All these problems are considered as push
factors in the sex trafficking flow from Kazakhstan to foreign countries. However, the
country is making efforts to eliminate sex trafficking by providing training to law
enforcement and judges, and increasing the school curriculum on this problem. But I think
that efforts should include comprehensive measures and solutions throughout all identified
push factors. This will be described in the chapter on recommendations.
47
Russia.
For decades, the primary sources of victims of sex trafficking were Thailand and the
Philippines. This changed with the collapse of the USSR which opened its borders for
millions of women to be exploited in foreign countries. Today sex industry markets are full of
women from Russia and Ukraine. Due to the unique geographical location of their country,
Russian women are trafficked to the Middle East, Western and Northern Europe, Asia,
Africa, the U.S, and South America (TIP Report, U.S. Department of State, 2001-2019). This
part of the chapter will examine what factors pushed Russian women into the sex industry in
foreign countries from 2001 to 2019. According to the TIP Report of the US Department of
State, the Russian Federation was on Tier 3 from 2001 to 2012 until the Russian government
stopped providing prosecution and protection data to the US due to strong disagreement with
the ranking of the report (TIP, 2001-2015, US Department of State). Russian authorities
claim that results are in “pre-formulated conclusions based on fragmentary evidence obtained
from dubious sources,” thereby dissipating the effectiveness of the “humanitarian and human
rights aspects of the report into slogans and labels” (RIA News, “Dolgov commented on TIP
Report of the US Department of State,” 2016). The TIP Report shamed the Russian
government for its passive response and the pressure from the international community to
adopt additional legislation whereas all 14 other FSU countries have passed around 100 laws
related to human trafficking. This pressure pushed many government officials into stagnation,
so they stayed away from this issue and the further policy development (Dean & Dovgaia
“The politics of Russia’s approach to human trafficking,” 2017). I argue that while historical
tensions between Russia and the US might have contributed to the problem, human
trafficking had become an issue after the collapse of the USSR and today’s Russian
government's deliberate neglect of the problem reflects the politicization of the issue.
48
1. Economic factors and Poverty level.
As discussed previously about Kazakhstan, all three countries shared the same
historical past after the collapse of the USSR when inflation dramatically rose, and there were
no goods available. The economy took time to move from a centrally planned economy to
privatized which turned over major state-owned companies to politically connected
“oligarchs.” The Russian government could not provide a basic quality of life. Women and
children were affected the most (De Mauro, 2016, p. 41). Rural regions experienced high
rates of poverty, labor market segregation, no access to education and healthcare (Protection
Project “Human Rights Report on TIP,” 2008). When the government launched market-
oriented reforms which was based on the Washington Consensus, recommendations of IMF
and US economists, the GDP fell by 40% in 1999, followed by hyperinflation, economic
inequality, poverty, and high mortality rates due to corruption. (Appel & Orenstein, 2018, p.
3). In the 1990s, Russia borrowed considerable amounts of money including money including
$20 billion from the IMF. The IMF was criticized for lending so much money while the
country did not undergo reform and corruption was on a high level (BBC News, “The
economy of Russia: IMF’s biggest failure,” 1999).
In the 2000s, Russia experienced significant economic growth due to major reforms
and building businesses in oil and gas, and mineral industries which resulted in a decline in
poverty from 30% in 2000 to 14% in 2008 (CIA, “The World Factbook. Russia”). The World
Bank estimates that poverty dropped by 24,6% to 12.9% during 2002 to 2018 showing
earnings of $5.50 per person a day (World Bank “Databank 2002-2018. Russia”). This
translates into around 21 million people living below the national poverty line (The Moscow
Times, “21 million Russians live in poverty, officials say,” 2019). In the 2008 report, the
World Bank declared that the Russian economy achieved “unprecedented macroeconomic
stability.” In 2013, the country was labeled as a high-income economy and second after Saudi
49
Arabia in economic performance among the G20 (World Bank, “Data. Russia”). The
country’s economy was the sixth-largest in the world by PPP and the twelfth largest at the
market exchange (Rosstad, “The dynamics of income 2000-2012”). If Russia has such an
outstanding economic performance in the world and all those titles, why then do energy
exports not improve growth in living standards and people remain living in poverty,
especially in rural areas? The answer is the same as for Kazakhstan as social and regional
inequality remain high in Russia.
In 2014, the picture of the Russian economy drastically changed after the annexation
of Crimea during the Ukrainian conflicts that was followed by the imposition of sanctions by
the US, the EU, Canada, and Japan resulting in a drop in oil and gas prices. The Ukrainian
crisis led to unemployment, high inflation, and poverty (see table 2). The crisis in Russia
affected other FSU countries due to the trade union resulting in currency devaluation,
inflation, and exports/imports ban from the EU and the US. Russia itself experienced an
abandonment of gas and oil purchases by the EU which was the main buyer of Russia’s
products. In 2015, the GDP fell by 3.7%, income dropped by 4.3%, salaries by 9.3%, and
inflation reached 13%. More than 2.3 million people reached the lowest level of the poverty
line (The Moscow Times, “Over 2 million Russians fall below poverty line,” 2015).
Table 2. Economic indicators of Russian Federation in 2001-2019 by IMF.
Year GDP per capita (in US dollars PPP)
Inflation rate (in percent)
Unemployment rate (in percent)
2001 12,054 21.5 % 9.0 %
2002 12,875 15.8 % 8.0 %
2003 14,156 13.7 % 8.2 %
2004 15,647 10.9 % 7.7 %
2005 17,232 12.7 % 7.2 %
50
2006 19,249 9.7 % 7.1 %
2007 21,473 9.0 % 6.0 %
2008 23,054 14.1 % 6.2 %
2009 21,411 11.7 % 8.2 %
2010 22,639 6.9 % 7.4 %
2011 24,259 8.4 % 6.5 %
2012 25,592 5.1 % 5.5 %
2013 26,430 6.8 % 5.5 %
2014 26,626 7.8 % 5.2 %
2015 26,247 15.5 % 5.6 %
2016 26,551 7.0 % 5.5 %
2017 27,474 3.7 % 5.2 %
2018 28,797 2.9 % 4.8 %
2019 29,453 2.1 % 4.2 %
Another poverty dimension is income inequality in Russia, the same as described in the
section of Kazakhstan. In 2000-2014, the top 1% of earners who are considered wealthy
oligarchs combined income was as high as 20-25% of the national income. The richest 10%
of Russians (oligarchs) own 87% of the country’s wealth which is the most unequal of the
world's big economies (The Borgen Project “The Rise of income inequality in Russia,”
2015). According to the World Inequality Database, Russia is the most divided in terms of
socioeconomic classes (World Inequality Database, “Income Inequality: Russia”). One of the
reasons for this is that Russia has an inadequate tax rate system that applies 13% “equal” tax
for everyone no matter oligarchs or poor people. Those in poverty are carrying more burden
(Borison, “Economic Inequality in Russia,” 2019). The rise of oligarchs who control most of
the businesses in Russia does not only contribute to sharp levels of income inequality but also
they have ties with politicians. In fact, they have the economic power to influence
51
governmental and market structures allowing them to pay low taxes and wages. Corruption
and ties with organized crime are often associated with oligarchs (The Borgen Project “The
Rise of income inequality in Russia,” 2015).
Public healthcare is underfunded, lacking modern equipment and with long lines to
wait for treatment in hospitals. As a result, people are forced to go to private hospitals which
are not covered by insurance. As for education, it is underfunded as well. However, Russian
schools score well in terms of inclusiveness. According to OECD’s PISA surveys, in Russia’s
social background, gender and migration do not influence educational performance. In 2017,
OECD surveyed people in which 45% of Russians see poverty and inequality as two of the
main problems of the country. With that being said, the income gap between oligarchs and
the rest of the people is exacerbated by factors as corruption and low taxes, but it is mitigated
by a relatively inclusive education system (European Parliament, “Social inequality in
Russia,” 2018).
Russia has regional poverty disparity similar to Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan and Russia
are two major economies in the FSU due to their energy sectors. These two regions have oil
and gas, and mineral industries such as Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous region, Chukotka,
Kamchatka, Magadan, Surgut, Noviy Urengoy, Nefteyugansk, and the Republic of Chechnya
have 33% higher incomes than other parts of countries. (Borison, “Economic Inequality in
Russia,” 2019). The largest cities Moscow and Saint-Petersburg are homes for skyscrapers,
businessmen, and billionaires. It is important to state that Russia has the second-largest
volume of illicit money outflows and offshores money. Since 2008 Forbes named Moscow
the “billionaire capital of the world” (Kar, LeBlanc, 2013, p. 6). The rest of the country
remains poor and underdeveloped, especially Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kalmykia, and Tuva. In
absolute terms, richer and developed cities are home to internal migrants migrating for a
52
better life. Similar patterns are observed in Kazakhstan’s oil and gas cities, Almaty
(commercial city), and Nursultan (capital).
The final dimension is the gender gap in pay in Russia which is considered as one of
the largest among high-income countries. The gap is around 30%, the occupational
segregation by gender and labor market discrimination where men make more money than
women.
In Soviet Russia, industrialization and egalitarian ideology encouraged women to
leave their homes and join the working class. Article 122 of the Soviet Constitution granted
equal rights for women in all spheres of economic, political, social, and cultural life. Women
used to receive generous benefits like paid maternity leave, free childcare, healthcare, and
legal protection from overly physical and dangerous jobs (Newell, Reilly, 2000, p. 2).
The collapse of the USSR and the transition from a planned to a market economy led
to changes in the labor market such as moving from heavy industry to banking and financing,
oil and gas production. Since women used to work in the lower tier of the income
distribution, they became the most vulnerable to liberalization. Most of them lost jobs, and
most importantly their access to benefits such as paid maternity leave, childcare, healthcare,
etc. For example, in 1995, men working in healthcare earned 50% more than women in that
field, male engineers earned 40% more than female ones. Even though women were more
educated than men, women remained paid less and in the minority in managerial positions
due to the patriarchal principles of the new Russia. Companies tend to fire women first or do
not hire them due to childcare benefits and maternity leave regulations (Jurajda, 2005, p. 599-
600).
Therefore, due to the gap between social classes, poverty, and poor income distribution
in rural regions, poor access to healthcare, high rates of inflation and unemployment, low
social security services, women seek jobs abroad, making them vulnerable to traffickers.
53
There is no significant difference in the economies of Russia and Kazakhstan except slightly
different economic indicators such as GDP per capita, inflation and unemployment rates
which will be discussed in the next chapter of comparative analysis. Both countries share the
same economic and political structure, social inequality, and a significant gender gap. And
both are rich in oil, gas, and mineral industries that are controlled by oligarchs who have ties
with government officials and organized crime.
2. Social and cultural factors.
Women in Russia’s multicultural society have different experiences due to social,
religious, ethnic, and racial lines. The life of ethnic Slav women can be dramatically different
from minority indigenous groups such Bashkir, Tatar, Yakut, Chechen, Ingush, Dagestan,
Sakha, and other women who practice their religious and cultural traditions. As described in
the previous part of the chapter, because of social class differences and regional poverty
disparity, the life of women from the upper class in Moscow can be dramatically different
from the life of women in rural areas with poor families. However, during the Soviet times in
a common historical and political context, all women no matter what ethnicity or religious
background, had equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social, and
political life (The Constitution of the USSR, Article 122). In the words of Vladimir Lenin:
"Petty housework crushes, strangles, stultifies and degrades [the woman], chains her to the
kitchen and to the nursery, and wastes her labor on barbarously unproductive, petty, nerve-
racking, stultifying and crushing drudgery" (Engel, 1987, p. 787). Soviet women were
independent and respected in society and had access to social benefits covered by the
government.
The USSR collapsed along with the image of “independent Soviet women.” The
transition from communism had political and economic impacts on women who lost their
54
jobs and benefits for free childcare and healthcare. According to official statistics, 72% of
women were unemployed in 1992 and 55% out of those had underage children. Most of those
women were highly experienced and educated engineers in their 30s and 40s. Unfortunately,
at that time newly opened companies required women for “secretary” job positions who wear
a mini skirt. Women began to experience sexual harassment and abuse at work, domestic
violence at home from their alcoholic husbands who just lost their jobs due to the collapse
(Racioppi & See, 1995, p. 826). Russia turned to a patriarchal government where the status of
women dropped dramatically and they remained unprotected by the government,
unemployed, and disrespected housewives. I think all this was a pattern that encouraged
migration to foreign countries not only for making money, but also to find a better place
where women are able to return to equal rights with men and protection. Unfortunately, most
of them ended up trafficked and enslaved in the worst living conditions.
This also affected women’s mental health and their self-confidence. According to
surveys of the Levada Center, all male participants in the study, regardless of age group,
responded that the most desirable quality in a woman was that she had to be a good
homemaker for a man. As for female respondents, all of them ranked independence as the
least important for themselves. “No one gender is at fault for the perpetuation of gender
inequality; instead, it is a product of Russian culture and society that each generation has
passed on to the next,” responded most older people (Levada Center survey cited by The
Borgen Project “5 facts about women’s rights in Russia,” 2020).
In today’s Russia, domestic violence is a serious threat. In 2017, the government
decriminalized domestic violence that does not cause serious injury like broken bones. Most
victims prefer not to report their abuse due to a lack of trust in law enforcement and a
legislative system widely perceived as both corrupt and male-dominated (The Borgen Project,
“5 facts about women’s rights in Russia,” 2020). The purpose of the thesis is not to victimize
55
women from the FSU, but to explain that these cultural and social factors pushed a rise in
strong feminist movements and activists (“Feminist Alternative”, “Woman Power”, “P...y
Riot”, women’s councils, etc.) supported by NGOs and international organizations (Ekmanis,
“Russia’s growing feminist movement from The World,” 2019). Russian women are more
active in feminism than Kazakhstani women do due to the fact that Kazakhstan has only one
feminist platform called “Kazfem” (UN Women, “Veronica Fonova: Becoming a feminist
and leading Kazakhstan’s first feminist rally,” 2020). However, I examine here the reasons
for those women who are vulnerable to sex trafficking abroad.
Another important dimension is similar to Kazakhstan’s return to traditions and
religion after the collapse of the USSR. Most Slavic families returned to the Russian
Orthodox Church’s beliefs that supports ideas of “traditional family values” and opposes the
ideas of feminism even when it comes to domestic violence (Ekmanis, “Russia’s growing
feminist movement from The World,” 2019). The Non-Slavic population began to practice
their culture and traditions especially Muslim ethnic groups in the Caucasus, Tatarstan,
Bashkortostan, and some parts of Siberia promoting male chauvinism. Family values require
women to be unemployed and stayed at home (Sreda Research Service, 2012, p. 18-59).
As described in the section on Kazakhstan, some traditional Non-Slavic people from
the Caucasus region practice “bride kidnapping” as well. But in comparison to Kazakhstan,
Russian law punishes kidnappers who refuse to release brides and they could be sentenced to
8-10 years in prison. But the tricky moment is if a kidnapper releases a victim or marries her,
then this will not be prosecuted but the victim might be traumatized, abused, and forced to do
things against her will (Isayev, “In Chechnya, attempts to eradicate bride abduction,” 2007).
However, international organization reports and the TIP report by the US Department
of State do not specify the ethnic background of Russian nationals who have been trafficked
abroad, so it is not easy to differentiate between Slavic and Non-Slavic women in that
56
perspective and what the cultural and religious roles are. So, I hypothesize that all described
dimensions demonstrate how women’s social status in Russia is similar to Kazakhstan in
regards to cultural factors, male chauvinism, the harsh transition period, unemployment,
unequal pay rate which created the conditions for sex trafficking.
3. Environmental problems.
Russia is the largest country in the world encompassing 11 time zones with abundant
natural resources, fossil fuels, boreal forests, endless steppe lands, a vast Arctic tundra,
Siberian forests and the Far East regions. It is home to endangered wildlife and indigenous
people making up 20% of the total population (EIA, “Country Analysis Briefs. Russia:
Environmental issues,” 2004). However, the country has massive environmental problems
that affect people’s lives and ecosystems. Russia’s economy is highly dependent on
extractive industries and the government has been promoting economic growth over
environmental protection.
Russia did not inherit ecological catastrophes that shocked the world as Kazakhstan
and Ukraine have experienced under the orders of the USSR government, but it has serious
environmental problems such as water and air pollution, desertification, deforestation, energy
and carbon intensity, nuclear waste, and chemical munitions contamination, climate change
and extreme radiation (National Intelligence Council, “The Environmental Outlook in
Russia”, 1999).
Deforestation due to heavy illegal logging is one of the biggest issues of Russia’s
ecology. According to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) the rates of logging are extremely
high which leads to erosion and greater levels of carbon dioxide in the air and impacts forest
species. The country loses 16 million hectares of forest each year (WWF cited by Smith,
“Russia: Environmental Issues, Policies and Clean Technologies,” 2015).
57
Nuclear radiation contamination of the countryside is another major concern. Most of
the Soviet nuclear weapon programs were in Ukraine and Kazakhstan which resulted in
environmental catastrophes. However, there are damages and radiation contamination from
these programs in Southern Siberia and Chelyabinsk as well. In 2017, French and German
officials reported: “... a spike in ruthenium 106 concentrations, a radioactive isotope, which
was 986 times higher than a month earlier, that Russia, at the time, denied having any
contributing role to this spike” (Smith, “Russia: Environmental Issues, Policies and Clean
Technologies,” 2015).
Since Russia and Kazakhstan are rich in minerals, oil and gas, people living near areas
like Sakhalin, Republic of Chechnya, Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous region, Chukotka,
Kamchatka, Magadan, Surgut, Noviy Urengoy, Nefteyugansk have health problems such as
cerebral circulation dysfunction, respiratory problems, heart attacks, cancer, birth defects, eye
problems, skin irritations and vomiting (Anand, 2013, p. 3080).
Russia is surrounded by oceans, seas and lakes making up 75% of surface water.
Unfortunately, 50% of all water in the country is polluted. This happened due to inefficient
water facilities and industrial and chemical waste which caused the death of fish in the Black
and Caspian Seas, and the cholera spread in the Moskva River in 1995 (Glenn, “Russia: A
country study,” 1996).
Climate change in Russia is another concern. Over the past 25 years, extreme weather
events have doubled in the country. The rise in average temperatures in the Arctic and the
rise of sea level might cause climate refugees and internal migration patterns. In 2010,
Moscow experienced hot summer days mixed with smog from fires causing the deaths of
11,000 people. Yet, climate change is not a priority for the government due to “being heavily
dependent on pumping oil and gas” (Davydova, “Russia wants to protect from climate change
without reducing carbon emissions,” 2017).
58
As discussed in the section on Kazakhstan’s environmental problems, the two
countries are interconnected by social and economic factors resulting in a bad quality of life
which has forced people to become environmental migrants, also called “climate refugees.”
There is no data on climate refugees fleeing from Russia specifically because of
environmental degradation but based on my hypothesis that health-related problems caused
by environmental issues and poverty create a pattern for sex trafficking. In this regard, I
hypothesize that Kazakhstan and Ukraine have more ecological patterns for sex trafficking
compared to Russia due to the tragic catastrophes of Chernobyl, desertification of the Aral
Sea, and Semipalatinsk Test Site.
4. Weak governance and the lack of legal protection.
The Russian government is under pressure by the international community and the US
Department of State to commit to combating irregular migration, cross-border crime, and
human trafficking. The Criminal Code of Russia does not meet the requirements of the UN
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children that was ratified in 2004. Also, the country has not yet ratified the Council of
Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings. Russia still does not
have a national plan of action addressing human trafficking compared to its neighbor
Kazakhstan which has implemented national and regional plans starting in 2008 (Protection
Project “Human Rights Report on TIP,” 2008). The US Department of State placed the
government of Russia on Tier 3 which is considered as the lowest level in combatting human
trafficking and “does not fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking
and is not making significant efforts to do so” from 2001 to 2019 (TIP Reports 2001-2019,
US Department of State). Why do both Kazakhstan and Russia share the same historical
background in regards to the collapse of the USSR and transition period, however,
59
Kazakhstan makes greater efforts in combatting human trafficking and even climbed to Tier 2
Watch List compared to Russia?
Anthony De Mauro argues that the biggest problem related to human trafficking, in
general, is the Russian government’s unwillingness to act against it due to its close ties with
the Russian mafia (De Mauro, 2016, p. 45). He also added:
... it (Russian government) has an interest in acquiring labor by means of trafficking
and a relationship with the criminal element responsible for the majority of the
trafficking into and out of Russia. This revelation emphasizes how difficult it will be
for any meaningful legislation to pass in the Russian government and for the law
enforcement to engage in meaningful activities such as surveillance, and raid
operations. This scenario leaves outside individuals who happen to stumble upon
human trafficking operations to take it upon themselves to engage in helping victims.
While a little action is better than none, the only way Russia’s human trafficking
problem will be dealt with is by a fundamental shift in how Russia’s government
operates in terms of organized crime and its acquiring of labor (De Mauro, 2016, p.
46-47).
However, adding to De Mauro’s argument, I hypothesize that sex trafficking
problems in Russia became more politicized in comparison to Kazakhstan due to
international pressure mostly from the US. It is in any country’s interest to adopt legislation
and laws on combating sex trafficking in order to get aid provided by the US Department of
State, and due to fear of sanctions imposed in case the country do not meet standards of
elimination of trafficking. This also can be explained by historic tensions between the two
countries due to the Cold War and political competition. The country refused to provide data
for annual TIP reports to the US Department of State due to strong disagreement with the
ranking of the report. Moreover, the country was on Tier 2 Watch List from 2005 to 2012 and
then dropped to Tier 3 from 2013 to 2020. In this regard, Kazakhstan and Ukraine have not
60
resisted improving standards to the degree that Russia has. My hypothesis is supported by T.
Prince (2019), L. Dean and A. Dovgaia (2017) (Dean & Dovgaia “The politics of Russia’s
approach to human trafficking,” 2017; Prince “U.S.: Russia Still Not Doing Enough To
Combat Human Trafficking,” 2019).
The government did not regularly provide data on trafficking prosecutions to the US
Department of State. With this incomplete and inaccurate data due to timing gaps, however, I
will use the ones available on TIP report archives.
Source: TIP Report by the US Department of State
Prosecution.
The Criminal Code of Russia has imperfections in regards to sex trafficking but it does
prohibit trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation and forced labor in Article 127. The
Article prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years for “illegal deprivation of liberty” and
“aggravating circumstances may extend penalties up to 15 years' imprisonment.”
Kazakhstan’s Criminal Code charges 15 years flat (The Criminal Code of the Russian
Federation, Article 127, 1996). In 2001-2003, the Interagency Working Group of the
Legislative Committee of the State Duma drafted the Federal Law to Combat Trafficking in
61
Human Beings, which was added to the legal and organizational structure for combating
trafficking (Protection Project “Human Rights Report on TIP,” 2008). However, in practice
the law on trafficking is nearly non-existent and inadequate. Yet, on average 20,000 police
officers are terminated for “ties with the mafia” (De Mauro, 2016, p. 33). In 2001, the US
Department of State reported that the high number of trafficking victims is due to a lack of
resources, training of law enforcement, and in adequate legislation (TIP Report, US
Department of State, 2001).
In the reports of 2001, 2004, 2008 (no data was provided in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006,
2007), the government finally recognized trafficking as a problem but combatting it was very
passive. Moreover, many officials argue that the problem of sex trafficking is “beyond their
purview” because victims leave Russia voluntarily for economic reasons and because the
violence and abuse of trafficking in women usually occurs outside Russia's borders, leaving
little to prosecute within Russia aside from fraud” (TIP Report, US Department of State,
2001). However, there were some improvements shown in the report of 2004 when law
enforcement made considerable efforts in prosecuting traffickers (more than 139
investigations on sexual exploitation). The US Department of State was concerned about the
accuracy of numbers of sex trafficked victims provided for reporting. The country itself does
not have internal statistics on sex trafficking (TIP Report, US Department of State, 2004 and
2008).
In 2010, a senior military officer was convicted to 10 years in prison for organizing
international sex trafficking involving 130 women and young girls from Eastern Europe to
Western Europe and the Middle East between 1999 and 2007. Other cases occurred the same
year. A low-level police officer was arrested for trafficking women for forced prostitution to
U.A.E. and another one involved two low-level police officers arrested for the same actions
(TIP Report, US Department of State, 2010). In 2011, another senior military officer and 10
62
of his colleagues were imprisoned for 12 years for sex trafficking rings abroad. The colonel
in St. Petersburg was involved in another sex trafficking activity (TIP Report, US Department
of State, 2011).
In 2011, the Ministry of Internal Affairs began to provide courses on human
trafficking awareness and training on a regular basis which were included in the national
curriculum for criminology courses at public colleges and universities (TIP Report, US
Department of State, 2011). In 2012, government authorities claimed that they often charge
sex trafficking cases under Article 241 (organization of prostitution) as that type of crime is
easier to prove (TIP Report, US Department of State, 2010). In this case, I think this might
create confusion in a screening of those women who are voluntarily entering prostitution and
those who are sexually exploited and forced to work as prostitutes. Both types are considered
criminals, but victimized women do not get proper legal protection and assistance.
In 2013, the Ministry of Internal Affairs issued the formation of an interagency anti-
trafficking commission with a representation from the prosecutor general’s office, the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Federal Migration Service, the Federal Security Service, and
the investigative committee (TIP Report, US Department of State, 2013). This is a big step in
the legal system of Russia, meaning the problem of sex trafficking is being acknowledged.
In 2014-2015, in the Chuvash Republic, the former chief of the criminal
investigation unit of the police provided cover for an organized crime group that is involved
in local prostitution, sex trafficking, and forced labor. There were reports that Russian law
enforcement was not cooperative with their foreign colleagues when it came to the
investigation of transnational trafficking cases and sharing best practices. However, in 2014
law enforcement collaborated with foreign law enforcement bodies (TIP Report, US
Department of State, 2014-2015).
63
In 2015-2019, the Russian government did not share information on trafficking cases
or statistics about criminal cases, making it difficult to measure the efforts of law
enforcement and the elimination of sex trafficking in the legislative system. Only some media
sources were publicly available to collect the data. Additionally, the government of Russia
did not report any investigations, prosecutions, or convictions of government employees
complicit in human trafficking offenses (TIP Report, US Department of State, 2016-2019).
Overall, throughout the reporting periods, there were few improvements in
prosecution and the legal system during 2001 to 2019. Evidence shows how government
officials have been involved in profiting from sex trafficking and their close ties with the
Russian mafia. It is also a common factor with Kazakhstan's legal system and corrupt
government officials, however, the intensity is lower compared to Russian officials who have
been arrested almost every year. Certainly, corruption is heavily involved which will be
discussed in the next section.
5. Corruption.
One of the factors that disgraced the ideology of the USSR was the existence of
corruption in every sphere, involving favors for favors, creating official papers as bribery and
making connections to get access for a better life. In 2020, Russia was ranked 129 among 180
countries with scores of 30 out of 100, and as the most corrupt country in Europe
(Transparency International, “Country Data. Russia,” 2020). In this regard, Kazakhstan has
made more anti-corruption efforts, holding a higher rank than Russia. President Vladimir
Putin has demanded the reduction of corruption in his strategies and national plans
throughout his presidency, however to Russians the problem remains widespread. According
to surveys of The Opora, 90% of entrepreneurs were involved in corruption at least once.
According to surveys of Contemporary Development in Moscow, corruption ranked as the
64
second biggest problem among households (Breslow, “Inequality and the Putin Economy:
Inside the number,” 2015).
The phenomenon of corruption is attributed to the weakness of the rule of law from the
historical perspective even way before the formation of the USSR, particularly in Tsarist
Russia (Suhara, 2004, p. 391). During the transition period in the 1990s, the transformation
brought about not only poverty and gaps in social class but also created a “vast vacuum in the
law.” In addition to that, law enforcement and courts did not perform well due to a lack of
budget, knowledge of a new system, and training (Suhara, 2004, p. 386-387). Moreover,
Russians or any other post-Soviets that are united linguistically and culturally, do not trust the
law and corrupt courts which is given in the following Russian proverbs:
・Law is a pole of a cart, you can handle it as you like (Закон дышло: куда захочешь, туда
и воротишь)
・Wherever there is a law, there is also insult (Где закон, там и обида)
・Wherever there is a law court, there is also untruth (Где суд, там и неправда)
・Even if you go to a court, you cannot find justice there (В суд пойдешь, правды не
найдешь)
・Fed up with lawsuits, reconciliation is the best (Полно судиться, не лучше ль
помириться)
・We don't fear a trial but fear a judge (“Judges are prone to take bribes”) (Не бойся суда, а
бойся судьи)
・Like a duck’s stomach, it is difficult to fill up a judge’s pockets (Утиного зоба не
накормишь, судейского карман не наполнишь)
・What is good for a judge is good for his pockets (Судье полезно, что в карман полезно)
・Into a court wearing a coat, out of the court without a shred of clothing on (Пошел в суд в
кафтане, а вышел нагишом) (Suharu, 2004, p. 391).
65
In today’s Russia, corruption is found in law enforcement, border control officers,
lawyers, judges, and security resulting in the growth of sex trafficking flows from Russia (De
Mauro, 2016, p. 11 and 31). This is even though the country signed and ratified the UNCAC
in 2008, and the former president of Russia Dmitry Medvedev introduced the National Anti-
Corruption Plan and National Anti-Corruption Strategy. That time during his presidency he
stated: "I will repeat one simple, but a very painful thing. Corruption in our country has
become rampant. It has become commonplace and characterizes the life of the Russian
society” (Russia Profile “Ten Russian Politicians, Who Make Influence on the Country,”
2018)
Government officials work with organized crime groups, providing illegal papers to
move victims abroad and they get solid bribes for that. Moreover, they make sure traffickers
get quick and smooth trafficking routes without any hassle on the borders which translated to
getting more money (De Mauro, 2016, p. 41).
I think one of the reasons Russia went down to Tier 3 in the TIP Report of the US
Department of State is due to the ties of law enforcement and border control officers with
organized crime. Interestingly enough Russia is one of the most corrupt countries in the
world but this factor was not viewed as a serious problem in any of the TIP reports from 2001
to 2017 and no anti-corruption recommendations were given by the US Department of State.
There was only one sentence found in the reports of 2018 and 2019 “Corruption and official
complicity remained significant concerns, inhibiting law enforcement” (TIP Report 2018-
2019, US Department of State). However, corruption was one of the main concerns in TIP
reports regarding Kazakhstan, although the country has more anti-corruption laws, more
progressive solutions, and ranked higher than Russia. Nevertheless, I think corruption is one
of the main factors contributing to the broken legal system of Russia and sex trafficking.
66
In the Russian country profile, there are similar problems as in Kazakhstan. But the
issues are less intensive in Kazakhstan and were identified as regional poverty disparity (poor
social system in rural areas) and unequal pay rate; weakened women’s role in the society;
weak governance and legislative system in prosecution of sex trafficking; corrupt government
officials who have strong ties with traffickers and organized crime. All these problems are
described as push factors in the sex trafficking flow from Russia to foreign countries.
Moreover, in comparison with Kazakhstan, Russia is making fewer efforts to eliminate sex
trafficking due to the politicization of this problem. Russia challenges this cooperation by
calling it an “interference in the country’s internal affairs.” However, Russia has stronger ties
with transnational criminal activities and corrupt government officials are profiting from that.
Ukraine.
Ukraine shares the same historical background from the collapse of the USSR and the
transition period of the 1990s as Russia and Kazakhstan. However, the country’s unique
geographical location and political structure makes a difference before and after the protests
called Euro Maidan. The annexation of Crimea led not only to reforms and a desire to join the
EU, but also to poverty and massive migration, including sex trafficking. Ukraine has not
mutually recognized borders with Russia, Moldova and Belarus which increases the demand
of crimes such as sex trafficking and makes transportation of women easier for traffickers
(Melnyk, 2014, p. 6). Ukraine is a country of origin, transit and destination of sex trafficking.
According to research of IOM, over 260,000 Ukrainians became trafficking victims since the
collapse of the USSR making Ukraine the main country of origin of victims in Europe (IOM,
“Statistics on combating trafficking in human beings in Ukraine,” 2019). Ukrainian women
67
are trafficked to Russia, the EU, Turkey, Serbia, China, the U.A.E, Israel, Middle East, the
UK and the US. According to D. Hughes, Ukrainian women are the largest group of foreign
women in prostitution in Turkey and outside the US military bases in Korea. Russian-
speaking women from the FSU are in over 50 countries where prostitutes are called
“Natashas” (Hughes, 2000, p. 629). Around 35% of 25,000 women in forced prostitution in
Netherlands are Ukrainians, and only 3% are Russians (Hughes, 2000, p. 647).
The US Department of State placed Ukraine in Tier 2 and Tier 2 Watch List
throughout the reporting cycles from 2001 to 2019 which rates the country’s efforts in the
elimination of sex trafficking.
This part of the chapter will examine five factors as key selected patterns of sex
trafficking flow from Ukraine to foreign countries.
1. Economic factors and Poverty level.
In comparison with Kazakhstan and Russia which are rich in oil, gas and minerals and
could therefore better absorb the shocks of transition, Ukraine experienced a harsh
transitioning to a market economy in the 1990s. It has resulted in hyperinflation which was
common to most former Soviet republics but Ukraine was among those who suffered the
most (London, “Why is Ukraine’s economy in such a mess?” 2014). The country already had
experienced a high poverty rate and unemployment, but in 2001 the standard of living for
most citizens increased due to 7 years of economic growth. As a World Bank report stated:
"Ukraine recorded one of the sharpest declines in poverty of any transition economy in recent
years. The poverty rate, measured against an absolute poverty line, fell from a high of 32% in
2001 to 8% in 2005” (World Bank, “Ukraine poverty update,” 2007).
Ukraine is not an oil and gas magnate, but it has its own traditional industries for
exporting such as metals, metallurgy, engineering, chemicals, and agrarian production giving
68
the Ukrainian economy growth (Sutela, “The Underachiever: Ukraine’s Economy since
1991,” 2012). However, in 2010, the country’s dependency on Russian oil and gas, corrupt
government, and shadow economy (around 40%) led to a default over the next 5 years at 50%
with no GDP growth (Azarov, “Shadow trade accounts for 40% of domestic markets,” 2011).
According to the World Bank’s report on poverty rate, Ukraine’s per capita ratio of those at
national poverty line significantly dropped from 83.3% to 1.3% between 2002 and 2018 at
PPP$1.9 a day (World Bank “Databank 2002-2018. Ukraine”).
Ukraine’s political and economic situation can be divided into before Euromaidan, a
mass protest held in Kiev, in 2014, the annexation of Crimea, and the war in Donbas
(Donetsk oblast and Luhansk oblast), and afterwards. The country’s economy shrank by
11.6% in 2016 (Radio Svoboda, “Ukraine conflict taking a heavy toll on economy says IMF,”
2016). Despite the fact that Ukraine is the fifth-biggest European nation by the size of the
population and had significant potential to become a member of the EU, the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO), and the OECD, the country never fulfilled these expectations
due to its geopolitical and economic complexity. Instead, it’s seen as a “sick man” of Europe
(Sutela, “The Underachiever: Ukraine’s Economy since 1991,” 2012). Sadly, in 2014, the
“Ukrainian crisis” led to a 31% decline in exports because of a sharp decline in production in
Donbas which are two of the more industrial oblasts of Ukraine. Additionally, Russia cut the
oil and gas exports to Ukraine (Ayres, “Amid staggering destruction, Eastern Ukraine looks
to rebuild,” 2014). According to the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine, 20-25% of
Ukrainian households are poor. The most vulnerable population is children under 18 and
women who have a poverty rate of 30.4%. In 2015, due to the devaluation of the national
currency against the US dollar (97.3%) which led to a high inflation rate, reduced incomes
and the unemployment rate amounted to 10% (UNDP, “How to overcome poverty in
Ukraine,” 2015). See table 3 (the data below is not fully accurate due to the annexation of
69
Crimea in 2014 and wars in Donbas which reflected in numbers as the wholeness of
Ukraine). Trapped in conflict with Russia and the former government’s mismanagement,
Ukraine became the poorest country in Europe by GDP after Moldova (The Guardian, “Sex,
lies and psychological scars: inside Ukraine’s human trafficking crisis,” 2016).
Table 3. Economic indicators of Ukraine in 2001-2019 by IMF
Year GDP per capita (in US Dollars PPP)
Inflation rate (in percent)
Unemployment rate (in percent)
2001 4,631 11.96% 11.06%
2002 4,999 0.76% 10.14%
2003 5,622 5.18% 9.06%
2004 6,522 9.05% 8.59%
2005 6,977 13.57% 7.18%
2006 7,776 9.05% 6.81%
2007 8,642 12.84% 6.35%
2008 9,062 25.23% 6.36%
2009 7,818 15.87% 8.84%
2010 8,245 9.37% 8.1%
2011 8,910 7.96% 7.86%
2012 9,343 0.57% 7.53%
2013 10,692 0.24% 7.17%
2014 10,744 12.07% 9.27%
2015 10,164 48.70% 9.14%
2016 10,148 13.91% 9.35%
2017 11,871 14.44% 9.51%
2018 12,629 10.95% 8.8%
2019 13,341 7.89% 8.88%
70
Ukraine has fewer problems arising from income inequality than Russia and
Kazakhstan, which have a higher income gap than Ukraine due to oil and gas billionaires and
millionaires. I also think that Ukraine’s transition and integration to the EU and other
international organizations that have certain requirements for accession is another reason.
According to the GINI Index, Ukraine has a rate of the income distribution at about 25%
compared to European countries, which have the smallest gap between poor and rich
(Pozhyvanov, “How Ukraine became an economic success leader,” 2018). However, let’s not
forget about the shadow economy which was mentioned previously in this section. The
shadow economy usually includes illegal trade, “black market,” unreported income, including
criminal activities. Russians and Kazakhs are similar. So with that being said, the data on
social gaps in Ukraine is inaccurate which does not include the shadow economy of the
country (40%). Ukraine has its own oligarchs who have ties with politicians and the mafia. In
2008, the wealth of 50 Ukrainian oligarchs was equal to 85% of Ukraine’s total GDP (Kuzio,
Oligarchs wield power in Ukrainian politics,” 2008).
Maurizio Bussolo, the World Bank Lead Economist for Europe and Central Asia, says
“When we ask people about their well-being, we hear concerns about rising inequality and
insecurity in Ukraine” (World Bank, “In Ukraine, Labor, Taxation, and Social Policies Must
Be Upgraded to Address Rising Inequality, Says World Bank,” 2018)
Another poverty dimension is the gender gap in pay. Ukrainian women make up
47.4% of the labor force and 60% of all Ukrainian women have college degrees and above.
However, the unemployment rate of all women is 80% which is extremely high compared to
men with the same college degrees (World Bank, “Labor force participation rate in Ukraine,
ages 15-64”).
Finally, all described poverty dimensions are similar to Russia and Kazakhstan in
terms of the gender gap in pay and the gap between social classes (not dramatically wide as
71
in the other two countries). Economic indicators are low compared to Kazakhstan and Russia
due to the absence of profitable oil and gas industries and mainly because the country has
been constantly at war since 2014. Political instability, war, conflicts between Russian
ethnical groups and Ukrainians, Russian political supporters and Ukrainian patriots, gender
inequality, poverty, high inflation, and unemployment all lead to migration. All these factors
create a pattern for job hunting abroad and vulnerability to sex trafficking.
2. Social and cultural factors.
Ukrainian women went through the same process of being first considered an
“independent Soviet woman” and then viewed as a vulnerable population of underpaid,
legally unprotected as did Russia and Kazakhstan. As described previously, in today’s
Ukraine, women receive lower salaries than men and rarely hold top managerial positions in
the government and business sector. Some employers prefer to hire younger women or
women over 35 so they would not deal with pregnancies and maternity leave (US Department
of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine,” 2008). Despite the fact that
the country ratified the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against
Women (CEDAW) and the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention on Preventing and
Combatting Violence against Women, gender discrimination remains widespread in Ukraine.
The country switched from Soviet norms to “traditional, patriarchal views and values that are
promoted by media and educational programs at high schools” (UN Women, “Europe and
Central Asia: Ukraine”).
Another important determinant of women conditions is that Ukraine has had an
ongoing armed conflict since 2014 with the annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbas. The
conflict has affected more than 5.2 million people, including displaced people who lost their
houses, jobs, and lives of their beloved ones. Internally displaced by the war and ethnic
72
minorities are the most vulnerable group of people (UN Women, “Europe and Central Asia:
Ukraine”). According to a survey conducted by La Strada International in 2015, 19% of
internally displaced persons (IDPs) were aware of cases when IDPs were trafficked, 10.8% of
IDPs voluntarily looked for employment abroad, 7.8% of IDPs were willing to work under
any conditions (La Strada Ukraine, “Assessment of the risks of internally displaced persons
in Ukraine being trafficked,” 2015).
There is also another category on a deeper level, ethnic Russians (17% of the total
population) make up an ethnic and linguistic minority group that is being harassed and
discriminated against. The hate comes from “ultra-right nationalists” from Eastern Ukraine
(Mychko, “Mykachiv’s syndrome,” 2009). There are also other ethnic minorities such as
Jews, Crimean Tatars (Muslims), Romani gypsies and Poles who are discriminated against by
ethnicity and religion as well (Human Rights First, “Hate Crime Survey: Ukraine,” 2008).
In situations of armed conflict, women, children and elderly people suffer the most due to
lack of access to social and childcare services, employment, healthcare, and most importantly
housing. Women are those who are responsible to take care of children, disabled and elderly
people making it harder to find jobs (UN Women, “Europe and Central Asia: Ukraine”).
Ukraine is a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural nation (similar to Russia and Kazakhstan)
that has returned to religion and culture after the collapse of the USSR which led to
politicized and patriarchal norms of the society where women turned into housewives. The
role of women dramatically declined while gender-based violence rose. Ninety percent of
cases of violence against women are mostly due to domestic violence (UN Women, “Europe
and Central Asia: Ukraine”). In the words of Nuzhat Ehsan, the representative of the UN
Population Fund in Ukraine “Ukraine really has an unacceptable level of violence, mainly by
men and mainly due to high levels of alcohol consumption. Additionally, loopholes in the
legislation contribute to the problem of domestic violence. You can violate women and still if
73
you are a high-level official or from a high-level official family, you can get away with it”
(Forina, “Kyivans join global rally to end violence against women,” 2013). There is some
feminist activism going on in the country addressing women’s rights such as Feminist
Ofenzyva and Ukrainian Woman’s Union. FEMEN, the most active women’s group was shut
down due to a fear “for their lives and freedom”; activists were systematically assaulted and
threatened (Ukrainskaya Pravda, “FEMEN activists fled from Ukraine,” 2013).
In summary, all described dimensions of how women exist under male chauvinism are
similar to Russia and Kazakhstan which affects their status in society, pay rate, and personal
security. More importantly, there was a new dimension found in this section that other two
countries do not have, it is women in armed conflict in Ukraine which led not only to poverty
and lack of access to social security and unemployment but also to separatism, discrimination
by religion, ethnicity and political views. More than 1.5 million Ukrainians were forced to
flee their homes because of war and poverty, and 3.5 million are still in need of humanitarian
aid in the war zone (UNHCR, “Ukrainian refugee crisis”). Women are a vulnerable
population who can be easily trapped by traffickers.
3. Environmental problems.
Ukraine has a number of environmental problems such as air pollution, quality of
water resources, land degradation, deforestation, solid waste management, biodiversity loss,
health problems caused by environmental factors, and climate change (World Bank, “Ukraine
Country Environmental Analysis,” 2016). However, the main environmental catastrophe that
Europeans have ever faced was Chernobyl that had affected not only nature, drinking water,
and people’s health in Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia, but radiation from Chernobyl were also
detected in parts of Scandinavia, Poland, the Baltic States, Germany, Switzerland, Northern
France, England, Africa, and China (De Leo “The first nuclear refugees come home,” 2007).
74
When it comes to Ukraine, 25% of the land area was affected by radiation. According to UN
reports, around 1 million people were exposed to radiation coming from food. Around 3.5
million hectares (8.6 million acres) of agricultural land and 1.5 million hectares (3.7 million
acres) of forests were also affected by the radiation of Chernobyl (Nations Encyclopedia,
“Ukraine - Environment”). The Chernobyl disaster is considered the worst nuclear plant
accident in history in terms of cost and casualties. More than 500,000 people were involved
in cleaning up the region, costing $68 billion in 2019 (adjusted for inflation of 18 billion
Soviet rubles) (NEA, “Chernobyl: Assessment of radiological and health impacts 2002”).
In 2005, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), UN organizations, the
governments of Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine held the Chernobyl Forum where reports on the
radiological environmental, and health problems of the Chernobyl disaster were presented.
Around 4,000 people died from cancer and leukemia caused by Chernobyl and 3000 people
died from acute radiation syndrome. Among 66,000 Belarussian and Ukrainian emergency
workers, 500 died in the 1990s (WHO, “Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident,”
2005). Additionally, approximately 150,000 abortions have been performed worldwide due to
fears of radiation from Chernobyl and 985,000 premature deaths were recorded (Yablokov &
Nesterenko “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment,”
2009). The consequences of the Chernobyl disaster are still ongoing and the environment and
1 million people’s health have been affected for a long-term period. (WHO, “World Health
Organization report explains the health impacts of the world's worst-ever civil nuclear
accident,” 2006).
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 116,000 people were evacuated
from the area and 230,000 people were relocated as internal refugees and as immigrants to
other countries. The relocation was a traumatic experience due to being labeled as an
“exposed person” and abandoned by society. Most of them consider themselves as “victims”
75
not “survivors” with poor health and psychological damages (WHO, “World Health
Organization report explains the health impacts of the world's worst-ever civil nuclear
accident,” 2006). Traumatized and vulnerable women from the Chernobyl catastrophe are
easy targets for traffickers who can promise to send them abroad so they can be released from
the label of an “exposed person.”
Another significant trigger of migration and sex trafficking is the damaged
environment in conflict areas, although ecologists and activists are “paralyzed” from
undertaking environmental activities in Donbas. For example, the Donbas region has massive
wildfires that prevent enemies from approaching the region. Land, soil, and air have been
extremely damaged by the war because of “concentrations of mercury, vanadium, cadmium
and non-radioactive strontium, as well as gamma-radiation” (Kuzubov, “On the verge of
disaster: top 5 environmental problems in Ukraine,” 2019). Oleksiy Vasyliuk, Ukrainian
environmental activist and scientist stated:
In my opinion, the pollution from explosive weapons, especially Grad missiles,
causes the most harm to the environment. Each explosion releases an enormous
amount of toxic elements into the soil and atmosphere. Thus, these heavy metals
accumulate in the human body, causing changes in the nervous and cardiovascular
systems, autism, renal failure, metabolic disorders, and even fetal death (Kuzubov,
“On the verge of disaster: top 5 environmental problems in Ukraine, 2019).
Other concerns are: climate change, air and water pollution, waterlogging by the river
Dnipro and salinization of large agricultural territories. The coal industry, one of the
profitable industries, made an enormous impact on the ecology of Ukraine creating problems
in the soil and groundwater.
In the end, Ukraine shares many similar environmental problems with Kazakhstan and
Russia such as air and water pollution, climate change, deforestation and salinization of
agricultural lands (Cherniavska, “Ecological Problems in Ukraine,” 2013). However, in
76
contrast, Ukraine does not have health problems coming from oil and gas industries and
regional poverty disparity because of these industries but faces unique environmental issues
caused by the Chernobyl catastrophe and war. Nevertheless, Kazakhstan also had two
environmental disasters that led to poverty, internal migration, and migration abroad.
Although neither Kazakhstan nor Russia has environmental problems caused by war.
4. Weak governance and the lack of legal protection.
The problem of trafficking in Ukraine remained unrecognized by the government and
did not receive proper attention until 2010. The government did not meet the minimum
standards in the elimination of trafficking due to a weak legislative system, lack of financial
resources, and corruption (TIP Report, US. Department of State, 2001). Additionally, it is not
easy to combat sex trafficking in the country with its ongoing armed conflict.
Ukrainian law states that all ministries and state agencies have to cooperatively
combat human trafficking. In fact, only the Ministry of Social Policy takes action in
combating trafficking on a national level. All other actors’ work remains inadequate (Melnyk,
2014, p.11). Article 124-1, 149 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine concerns crimes of human
trafficking and any illegal transfer deals in respect to a human being which includes
punishment 3-15 years, similar to Kazakhstan and Russia (Criminal Code of Ukraine). The
National Referral Mechanism (NRM) was adopted in 2012 providing legal, medical, and
social assistance to victims of human trafficking (Melnyk, 2014, p. 16).
Ukraine signed and ratified the UN Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime in 2004, the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human
Beings in 2011, and an Association Agreement with the EU that underlines respect of human
rights and freedoms as one of the most crucial basis for future cooperation in 2014. Since
Ukraine did not perform well institutionally and financially in combating trafficking, the help
77
of international organizations was needed, especially in order to have accession to the EU.
The country became a partner of European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) which requires
respect for democracy and human rights. The EU-Ukraine Action Plan on Visa Liberalization
in Section 3 calls for the adoption of the National Program on Combating Trafficking in
Human beings (Melnyk, 2014, p. 19-20).
The European Union Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) is funded by the EU and
UNDP which assists Moldova and Ukraine in terms of border management to tackle the
problem of trafficking (Melnyk, 2014, p. 21). Moreover, Cross Border Cooperation Programs
within ENPI (CBCP ENPI) are aimed to prevent trafficking among EU and non-EU member
states that have common borders. For example, ENPI CBC Romania-Ukraine-Moldova and
ENPI CBC Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine (Melnyk, 2014, p. 22-23). As described, Ukraine has
more assistance from the EU and other international organizations than Russia and
Kazakhstan due to its candidacy to become an EU member state and its common borders with
other EU member states. The EU provides border assistance to Ukraine because the country
has not secured its borders yet which makes it easier for transnational organized crime to
transport victims of trafficking.
Source: TIP Report by the US Department of State
78
Prosecution.
In 2001-2002, the government of Ukraine partially implemented a national action plan
on combatting human trafficking. In terms of the investigation, the country relies on law
enforcement trained by the government and NGOs, but so far they have had a limited impact.
The government suspended licenses of individuals and travel companies involved in
trafficking (TIP Reports 2001-2002, US Department of State).
In 2003-2005, cooperation and coordination with law enforcement officials has
improved but remained inadequate to address the problem of human trafficking. The problem
of the weak borders of Ukraine-Russia remained unresolved. In 2005, the government
successfully caught 17 organized groups that were involved in trafficking. However,
trafficking-related complicity and official involvement was a serious problem. There were
reports of high-level official intervention that pushed to sentence reduction (TIP Reports
2003-2005, US Department of State).
In 2006-2009, the government and international organizations organized training for
judges, prosecutors, investigators, and also over 500 officers assigned to combat trafficking.
In 2005, the government amended its criminal code to meet all universal requirements of the
UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Person while Kazakhstan and
Russia have not done that yet. This improvement led to success in prosecuting and punishing
trafficking crimes by completing more criminal investigations. The OSCE sponsored
seminars on trafficking-related cases for over 200 judges and prosecutors. In 2009, the
General Prosecutor’s Office encouraged prosecutors to challenge non-custodial sentences for
traffickers who were recently sentenced. Moreover, prosecutors began filing additional
petitions to challenge sentences even after appeals had been exhausted (TIP Reports 2006-
2009, US Department of State).
79
In 2010-2013, prosecutors continued to appeal low sentences on convicted traffickers,
and judges did not want to recognize trafficking victims, a situation which may lead some to
believe that judges and prosecutors were either corrupt or lacked training. However, the
government continued to increase trafficking-related sessions in seminars for judges,
prosecutors, and law enforcement officers. In 2011, the government cooperated with twenty
other governments on an investigation into transnational organized crime that was involved in
trafficking. In 2012, a case in Volyn oblast was reported in which a village council deputy
was involved in a criminal group that trafficked 20 women to Poland. Overall, the
government under Viktor Yanukovich decreased anti-trafficking law enforcement efforts in
investigation and prosecution (TIP Reports 2010-2013, US Department of State).
In 2014-2016, the government investigated cases under Article 149, but it did not
identify which law enforcement efforts were involved in sex trafficking and which ones were
in labor trafficking, making it difficult to provide separate data on two different offenses. The
government trained 14 detectives and around 5,150 officials on trafficking awareness, and
300 government officials on the national referral mechanism. Starting in 2016, law
enforcement performed weak efforts in combating trafficking due to its focus on fighting
Russian aggression (TIP Reports 2014-2016, US Department of State).
In 2017-2019, the government slightly intensified its law enforcement efforts in
combatting sex trafficking but most of the efforts were focused on wars in Donbas and
Russian aggression. The problem of significantly reduced sentences to convicted traffickers
remained a serious problem due to a weakness in government prosecution efforts.
Prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement still have a limited understanding in identifying and
prosecuting sex trafficking and labor trafficking cases separately. However, institutional
reforms over the past 4 years made significant changes in many government institutions
including police and the judiciary. The recertification and restructuring of police included
80
mandatory training and testing on human trafficking with the assistance of international
organizations which led to the reduction of corruption among police officers. In comparison
with Kazakhstan and Russia, Ukraine has made better improvements and performance in
educating the law enforcement officers and reduction of corruption with help of international
organizations (TIP Reports 2017-2019, US Department of State).
In addition, the government began to arrest government officials involved in
trafficking. For example, the commander of the Kyiv City police counter-trafficking unit was
under investigation, two police officers were sentenced to 6 months and three police officers
were under house arrest. In 2018, the authorities collaborated with the governments of
Moldova, Russia, Turkey, Poland, Netherlands, Belarus, France, Greece and Lithuania on an
investigation of transnational organized crime (TIP Reports 2017-2019, US Department of
State).
5. Corruption.
Corruption is widespread in almost every sphere of Ukraine. In 2020, Ukraine was
ranked 117 among 180 countries with scores of 33 out of 100, and the second most corrupt
country in Europe after Russia (Transparency International, “Country Data. Russia,” 2020).
In this regard, Kazakhstan has made more anti-corruption efforts and holds a higher rank than
Russia and Ukraine. According to Ernst & Young, in 2012 Ukraine was one of the three most
corrupt countries in the world along with Brazil and Colombia. In 2017, it went down to
ninth place (Tkachuk, “People first: the latest in the watch on Ukrainian democracy,” 2012;
EY, EY Fraud Survey “Detailed Results,” 2017). In 2015, The Guardian called Ukraine “the
most corrupt country of Europe” referring to corrupt hospitals (Bullough, “Welcome to
Ukraine, the most corrupt nation in Europe,” 2015). According to the US Foreign Service,
81
Ukraine’s government under the presidency of Leonid Kuchma and Viktor Yushchenko was
kleptocratic (Onyshkiv, “Clearer picture,” 2011).
The roots of corruption in Ukraine lie in the historical past of the USSR, as is the
case also for Kazakhstan and Russia. The prevailing Communist nomenclature regime has
yielded an authoritarian-oligarchic governance regime after its collapse (Bazaluk, 2016, p.
16). Since then corruption has become a part of society’s life. According to Survey by the
Ilko Kucheriv Foundation for Democratic Initiatives, in 2020 around 36% of respondents
stated that corruption is “a component of social traditions” (Ukrainian Pravda, “What a crime,
what a punishment! Or why the “people’s answer” to the president’s first question will not
surprise anyone,” 2020). Most Ukrainian people like any other former Soviets think that
corruption is a part of the culture inherited from the Soviet Union. Most high-level politicians
such as the president, chairman of the Verkhovna Rada (the parliament), prime minister,
prosecutor general, were sentenced for corruption in 2011. More than 500 criminal cases
have been filed for other high-level politicians (Reuters, “Ukraine advances on anti-
corruption practices,” 2011).
In 2008, according to a survey of Management Systems International (MSI), the
highest levels of corruption were in the police (54.2%), health care (54%), and courts (49%)
(Global Corruption Report, 2008, p. 280). Since the interest of my research is how sex
trafficking is prevented in Ukraine, then courts, prosecutors, and police are the ones who are
responsible. The Ukrainian legal system is extremely corrupt. Independent lawyers and
human rights activists state that judges were under pressure “to hand down a certain verdict”
(Reuters cited by Kyiv Post, “In Ukraine, scales of justice often imbalanced,” 2012). People
do not trust the justice of courts in general. According to the Ukrainian Justice Ministry
survey in 2009, only 10% of respondents trusted the country’s court system (Byrne,
“Jackpot,” 2010).
82
One of the reasons that Ukraine remains in the Tier 2 Watch List and Tier 2 of the TIP
Report of the US Department of State is due to corrupt law enforcement, prosecutors, and
courts. In the reports of 2002 and 2006, corruption and “high-level intervention” were
defined as serious problems. The anti-trafficking police itself was taking bribes for selling
women abroad (TIP Report 2002, 2006, US. Department of State). However, even though in
2007, the former President V. Yushchenko and former Prime Minister V. Yanukovich
publicly announced that corruption remained a major problem for Ukraine, border guards and
other law enforcement were not punished for taking bribes on sex trafficking (TIP Report
2007, US. Department of State).
In 2008, 2009, and 2011, several reports stated that there was widespread corruption
of trafficking-related cases and the government held a passive position on investigation,
prosecution, and sentencing of government officials who were involved in trafficking.
Moreover, local NGOs reported that judges, prosecutors, and border guards were involved in
trafficking cases and took bribes for that (TIP Report 2008, 2009, 2011, US. Department of
State).
In 2014-2015, the government did not report any investigations or prosecutions of
government officials who were involved in taking bribes from trafficking cases and their ties
with organized crime, despite the fact that corruption was reported on the highest level in
other sectors TIP Report 2014, 2015, US. Department of State).
As described in this part of the chapter, corruption remains a major problem that
contributes to sex trafficking flow from Ukraine. Even though the country is making
significant efforts in combating human trafficking and other crimes, restructuring and
recertifying the police units and providing training that meet international standards,
corruption became a major problem for its accession to the EU. In 2016, IMF Mission Chief
for Ukraine stated that reduction of corruption is “the key factor to get the international
83
support for Ukraine” (Reuters, “Ukraine, IMF agree terms to resume financial support,”
2016).
In summary, Ukraine has similar problems which are universal in the former USSR.
These same problems are reflected in Kazakhstan and Russia, such as regional poverty
disparity, patriarchal norms in the society, gender gaps in income, bad governance, and
corrupt government officials. However, Ukraine has a unique situation due to the armed
conflict in Donbas and Russian aggression which impact the economic and social life of
people, especially women. Environmental problems caused by the Chernobyl catastrophe and
the ongoing armed conflict in Donbas are major factors in increasing sex trafficking flows.
Even police units are more occupied with Russian aggression than with combatting sex
trafficking. Yet, there is a big difference found between Russia and Kazakhstan vs. Ukraine.
The country is supported and assisted by international organizations financially and
institutionally not only because of humanitarian-related reasons but also Ukraine is a
candidate to become a EU member state as well as NATO and OECD members. With that
being said, Ukraine as a potential candidate has a stronger legal system and the country's
motives to adapt to European principles of democracy and respect of human rights are on
another level than in Russia and Kazakhstan.
Comparative Analysis. Part 2 Table 4. Cross-national comparative analysis by push factors of sex trafficking
Push factors Kazakhstan Russia Ukraine
Economic
factors and
Poverty level
1. Economy. The
country has transitioned
from lower-middle-
1. Economy. The
country has a status of
upper-middle-income, a
1. Economy. The
country is a lower-
middle-income country,
84
income to upper-middle-
income status in 20
years. Abundance in oil
and gas, grain and
metals.
The growth of GDP per
capita from PPP$9,2 in
2001 to PPP$29 in 2019.
Inflation rate from 8.4%
in 2001 to 6.2% in 2019.
The unemployment rate
from 10.4% in 2001 to
4.8% in 2019. Poverty
level (headcount ratio)
from 46.7% in 2001 to
2.3% in 2019. Ukrainian
crisis affected the
economy in 2014
resulting in a devaluation
of the currency by 22%.
2. Regional poverty
disparity. Oil and gas-
rich cities, Nursultan and
Almaty have financial
abundance, while other
towns and villages
remain underdeveloped
high-income country
among G20.
Abundance in oil and
gas, minerals. The
growth of GDP per
capita from PPP$12 in
2001 to PPP$29.5 in
2019. Inflation rate
from 21.5% in 2001 to
2.1% in 2019. The
unemployment rate
from 9% in 2001 to
4.2% in 2019. The
poverty level
(headcount ratio) from
24.6% in 2001 to 12.7%
in 2019. Ukrainian
crisis and the
annexation of Crimea
affected the economy in
2014 resulting in a
devaluation of the
currency by 30% in
2014, oil prices dropped
by 50%, no exports of
oil and gas allowed to
the EU (main buyer),
the poorest country of
Europe. It does not have
oil and gas industries,
but there are metals,
metallurgy and
chemicals industries.
The growth of GDP per
capita from PPP$4.6 in
2001 to PPP$13.3 in
2019. Inflation rate from
12% in 2001 to 8% in
2019. The
unemployment rate from
11% in 2001 to 8.8% in
2019. The poverty level
(headcount ratio) from
83.3% in 2002 to 1.3%
in 2018. The Ukrainian
crisis, the annexation of
Crimea, the war in
Donbas affected the
economy from 2014
until now resulting in a
devaluation of the
currency by 97.3% to
the US dollar.
Dependence on Russian
85
in extreme poverty
conditions.
3. Gender income
inequality.
Women earned 30-35%
less than men in 2012-
2016; held 10% of
political civil positions
and 20% of seats in
Parliament and executive
banking jobs
4. Social gaps. Kazakh
oligarchs own 80% of
privatized national
companies, especially
the former president’s
(N.Nazarbayev) family.
sanctions from the EU,
the US, Japan and
Canada. More than 2.3
million people reached
the lowest level of the
poverty line.
2. Regional poverty
disparity. Oil and gas
production cities,
Moscow and St.
Petersburg have
financial abundance,
while other towns and
villages are in extreme
poverty.
3. Gender income
inequality. The gap is
30% overall, female
doctors make 50% less
than male engineers,
female engineers make
40% less than male
colleagues.
4. Social gaps.
Oligarchs own 87% of
the country’s wealth,
combined income is
oil and gas, decline in
exports by 31% in 2014
because of a sharp
decline in production in
Donbas. Around 20-
25% of households are
poor.
2. Regional poverty
disparity. Kyiv is the
most developed city, it’s
home to high-tech
industries where people
make more money than
in other cities/towns.
3. Gender income
inequality.
Unemployment among
women is 80%
compared to men with
the same college
degrees.
4. Social gaps. The
country has the shortest
distance of the income
distribution between the
poor and rich among
European countries.
86
high as 20-25% of the
national income.
However, 40% of the
shadow economy was
not taken into
consideration.
Social and
cultural factors
1. Gender inequality.
Women’s role in society
declined after the
collapse of the USSR.
During the transition
period, they lost social
benefits covered by the
government and their
rights to work and earn
the same amount of
money as men.
2. Discrimination
against ethnic
minorities (Slavs and
other non-titular
populations). Women of
non-titular populations
have low chances to get
well-paid jobs.
3. Traditional
patriarchal norms and
violence against women
1. Gender inequality.
Women’s role in
society changed from
“independent, protected
and self-confident” to
“unemployed
housewives.”
2. Rise of domestic
violence. The
government
decriminalized
domestic violence and
society accepted it as a
part of “culture” (“If a
man beats, he shows his
love to a woman”).
3. Return to traditions
and religion. The
Russian Orthodox
Church promotes ideas
of “traditional families”
and opposes feminism.
1. Gender inequality.
Women are underpaid,
unprotected by the
government, and the
majority are
unemployed.
2. Women in the
armed conflict zone.
Women experience a
lack of access to jobs,
childcare, healthcare.
They have to take care
of children, elderly
people and sick/injured
soldiers from their
households. Some non-
titular minorities
(Russians, Poles, Jews,
Roma) under heavy
discrimination against
ethnicity.
87
in terms of returning to
traditions and religion
(bride abduction,
polygamy marriage).
Some Non-Slavs
(ethnic minorities)
practice bride
kidnapping, polygamy
marriage.
3. Rise of domestic
violence. Around 90%
of cases of violence
against women are
domestic violence.
There are loopholes in
legislation that
contribute to the
problem.
4. Traditional
patriarchal norms and
violence against
women in terms of
returning to religion and
traditions. No data on
bride kidnapping cases
have been found.
Environmental
problems
1. General ecological
issues: desertification,
salinization, radiation,
soil erosion, climate
change, sand storms, air
and water pollution.
2. Consequences of the
Aral Sea catastrophe
led to losing jobs in
1.General ecological
issues: water and air
pollution,
desertification,
deforestation, energy
and carbon intensity,
nuclear waste, and
chemical munitions
contamination, climate
1.General ecological
issues: air pollution,
quality of water
resources, land
degradation,
deforestation, solid
waste management,
biodiversity loss, health
problems caused by
88
agriculture, internal
migration and
immigration abroad, a
massive flow of
displaced people with
health problems. The
region lacks a health
infrastructure, health
specialists, equipment,
medications and
diagnostics.
3. Consequences of
Semipalatinsk Test Site
led to serious health
problems, specifically
genetic mutations due to
radiation, losing jobs,
internal migration and
migration abroad.
4. Oil and gas
production emits huge
amounts of harmful
chemicals that affect
people’s health and the
ecosystem in the region.
change and extreme
radiation.
2. Oil and gas
production areas bring
a lot of harm to
people’s health and
ecosystems in the
region.
environmental factors,
and climate change.
2. Consequences of the
Chernobyl catastrophe
led to massive deaths,
health problems due to
radiation, 150,000
abortions worldwide,
985,000 premature
deaths, 230,000 internal
refugees. Twenty-five
percent of Ukrainian
land was affected by
radiation.
3. Consequences of the
armed conflict in
Donbas led to massive
wildfires to prevent
enemies from
approaching the region.
Land, soil, and air have
been extremely
damaged by the war
because of strong
concentrations of
chemicals.
89
Weak
governance and
the lack of
legislation
1. According to the TIP
Report, Kazakhstan
moved from Tier 3 to
Tier 2 and Tier 2 Watch
List between 2001 and
2019, and recognized
trafficking as a problem.
2. The legislation
difficulties. It is difficult
to prosecute all involved
in sex trafficking
networks (from the
mafia, pimps, exploiters
to corrupt officials).
They get separate
charges. There is no
legal definition of the
term “exploitation”
resulting in the
interpretation of this
term by judges
individually which can
be different from the
minimal standards of the
UNTOC Protocol. There
are amendments in the
penal code and criminal
1. According to the
TIP Report, Russia
dropped from Tier
Watch List 2 to Tier 3
in 2001-2019.
Trafficking problems
remain politicized in
Russia, the government
refuses to provide data
on combating efforts
due to ties with
organized crime and
pressure from the
international
community and the
US.
2. The legislation
difficulties. It does
prohibit trafficking for
commercial sexual
exploitation and forced
labor from 3-15 years
depending on
circumstances. In
practice, the law on
trafficking is nearly
non-existent and
1. According to the
TIP Report, Ukraine
was placed in Tier 2 and
Tier Watch List 2 in
2001-2019. It
recognized the problem
of trafficking only in
2010.
2. The legislation
difficulties. The
problem of significantly
reduced sentences to
convicted traffickers
remained a serious
problem due to “a
weakness in government
prosecution efforts.”
Prosecutors, judges, law
enforcement had limited
understanding to
identify and prosecute
sex trafficking and labor
trafficking cases
separately. The legal
code has a universal
definition of trafficking
by UNTOC Protocol. In
90
code that allow
defendants to pay
monetary compensation
to a victim in exchange
for having the criminal
case withdrawn. Victims
are not recognized once
they reach the country of
origin, instead, they get
imprisoned for
prostitution abroad.
There is no victim-
centered approach.
3. The country has a
national plan on
combating trafficking,
law enforcement officers
and judges get training
regularly.
inadequate. The legal
code does not have a
universal definition of
trafficking by UNTOC
Protocol. There are
concerns regards to
accuracy of the
numbers of sex
trafficked victims
provided for reporting
because the country
does not have internal
statistics on sex
trafficking. Sex
trafficking cases are
charged under Article
241 (organization of
prostitution) as that
type of crime is easier
to prove which is
inadequate in terms of a
difference between
“voluntarily
prostitution” and
“forced sexual
exploitation”.
2017-2019, institutional
reforms made
significant changes in
police and the judiciary.
The recertification and
restructuring of police
included mandatory
training and testing on
human trafficking with
the assistance of
international
organizations which led
to the reduction of
corruption among police
officers.
3. Ukraine has a
national plan, EU-
Ukraine Action Plan
and NRM on
combating trafficking.
Law enforcement
officers, judges and
border control officers
get training regularly by
the government and the
OSCE.
91
3. Russia does not have
a national plan on
combating trafficking.
There is a low
improvement in training
for law enforcement
and judges
4. Ukraine has strong
institutional and
financial support from
international
organizations that help
to eliminate trafficking
through different actors
such as EUBAM,
UNDP, CBCP ENPI.
5. Ukraine’s law
enforcement efforts
were reduced after 2015
due to its focus on
fighting Russian
aggression.
Corruption 1.The nature of
corruption was inherited
from the USSR’s
weakness of the rule of
law.
2. Kazakhstan was
ranked 94 among 180
countries with scores of
38 out of 100 by the
Global Corruption
Perception Index.
1. Corruption was
inherited from the
USSR and Tsarist
Russia’s weakness of
the rule of law.
2. Russia was ranked
129 among 180
countries with scores of
30 out of 100, and as
the most corrupt
country in Europe.
1. Corruption was
inherited from the
USSR’s weakness of the
rule of law.
2. Ukraine was ranked
117 among 180
countries with scores of
33 out of 100, and the
second corrupt country
in Europe after Russia.
92
3. Corruption in the
judicial system, courts,
police, customs, public
services, legislation, civil
society. Border control
officers, law
enforcement, judges take
bribes for sex trafficking
cases and have ties with
organized crime.
Corruption is one of the
reasons the country got
stuck in Tier 2 and Tier 2
Watch List mentioned as
a serious problem rooted
in the legislation system
3. Corruption is found
in law enforcement,
border control officers,
lawyers, judges, and
security officers who
take bribes and have
strong ties with the
Russian mafia.
Corruption is one of the
reasons the country got
stuck in Tier 3,
however, there were no
records on corruption
found in the TIP
Report.
3.Courts, police, and
healthcare have the
highest levels of
corruption. Corruption
and “high-level
intervention” are some
of the reasons the
country got stuck in Tier
2 and Tier 2 Watch List.
The government is
passive in investigation
of government officials
who were involved in
trafficking.
In sum, the comparative analysis findings (see Table 4) indicate that there are
generally similar push factors of sex trafficking and their dimensions in Kazakhstan, Russia
and Ukraine due to their common historical background, the continuing influence of the
legislative system of the USSR, and the traumatic transition of their economies toward
market-oriented models. However, some individual differences impact the social and
economic development of countries such as environmental catastrophes and the war in
Donbas making country profiles significantly different.
Kazakhstan and Russia have the most prosperous economies in the post-Soviet world
while Ukraine has struggled with the transition the most due to the former government’s
mismanagement and the conflict with Russia which has weakened the economy. The growth
93
of GDP per capita from 2001 to 2019 shows that Russia had the most stable economic
indicators (PPP$12 in 2001 to PPP$29.5 in 2019), Kazakhstan did not fall behind equating
the same numbers by 2019. However, Russia had the highest inflation rate (from 21.5% in
2001 to 2.1% in 2019) in the 2000s and dramatic improvement by 2019. The unemployment
rate in Kazakhstan and Russia was about the same while Ukraine barely improved (from 11%
in 2001 to 8.8% in 2019). Kazakhstan’s efforts in fighting poverty were incredible (from
46.7% in 2001 to 2.3% in 2019), Ukraine with the help of international organizations during
the ongoing war showed fascinating results (from 83.3% in 2002 to 1.3% in 2018) as well
while Russia made the modest improvement (from 24.6% in 2001 to 12.7% in 2019). So far,
the Ukrainian crisis, the annexation of Crimea, the war in Donbas affected the economy of
Ukraine the most resulting in a devaluation of its currency by 97.3% in 2014 and the halting
of oil and gas imports from Russia. In the meantime, Russia’s economy and diplomatic
relations suffered from long chalks including the international ban of Russian gas and oil,
economic sanctions and international pressure from the EU and the US resulting in an
economic crisis. Kazakhstan had a chain reaction from the Ukrainian crisis due to a common
trade union with Russia. Sanctions imposed on Russia indirectly led to a lesser extent crisis
with the high inflation rate and devaluation of the currency by 22% in 2015. These findings
are discussed in the country profiles and in Table 4.
Social and cultural factors are most likely common in terms of returning to traditions
and culture with patriarchal norms that promote “traditional family values” and opposing the
rise of feminism. The tradition of bride kidnapping was found mostly in Kazakhstan and to a
lesser extent in Russia while no data of bride kidnapping was found in Ukraine. Gender
inequality in terms of “fallen women’s role” in society and gender income gaps are common
as well. Violence against women in terms of domestic violence Russia has the worse position
among other selected countries in terms of decriminalizing domestic violence and taking it as
94
a part of the culture. Kazakhstan tends to discriminate against ethnic minorities (Slavs and
other non-titular populations) resulting in a privilege in well-paid jobs for Kazakh women
than to non-Kazakhs. However, discrimination against ethnic minorities was found in
Ukraine as well in the context of the war conflict in Donbas. Some non-titular minorities
(Russians, Poles, Jews, Roma) under heavy discrimination against ethnicity. The unique
dimension of Ukrainian women (in general) in the conflict is found in a lack of access to jobs,
childcare, healthcare. They have to take care of children, elderly people and injured soldiers.
All three countries have almost the same environmental issues in regard to air and
water pollution, deforestation, radiation, land degradation and climate change. However,
Russia did not experience the world, well-known environmental catastrophes as Kazakhstan
and Ukraine did. Kazakhstan suffered most as a result of the desertification of the Aral Sea
which created 5 million displaced people, worsening health problems, land degradation, and
climate change. The region lacks a health infrastructure, health specialists, modern
equipment, medications and diagnostics. Radiation from the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site
affected more than 80% of the population of Semey city that had genetic mutations and
serious health problems. Moreover, the agriculture, ecosystems, rivers, landscapes and socio-
economic conditions led to massive internal migration and immigration abroad. As for
Chernobyl, Ukraine’s environmental catastrophe that destroyed flora and fauna by radiation,
damaged millions of people’s health not only Ukrainians, Russians and Belorussians but also
people from other parts of Europe. It also led to abortions, premature deaths, cancer,
psychological problems caused by being labeled as an “exposed person”. All these humans
induced catastrophes were created by the government of the USSR which after all did not
take care of the consequences of the political agenda.
Ukraine’s current situation in the conflict is another dimension that Kazakhstan and
Russia never experienced. The war in Donbas led to deforestation due to massive wildfires to
95
prevent enemies from approaching the region. Land, soil, and air have been extremely
damaged by the war because of strong concentrations of chemicals. These problems have
made women more vulnerable to traffickers.
Kazakhstan and Ukraine made more efforts in eliminating trafficking by being placed
on Tier 2 and Tier 2 Watch List and recognizing trafficking as a problem. Kazakhstan has
made modest progress in the training of law enforcement and judges, the legal code does not
meet the requirements of the universal definition of sex trafficking. The legal code is also
missing a victim-centered approach that guarantees protection and assistance after being
repatriated to the homeland. Ukraine had more training for law enforcement and judges,
however, they had difficulties in identifying victims and prosecuting traffickers. The country
was supported institutionally and financially by the international organizations that forced the
government to make reforms in the recertification and restructuring of the police including
mandatory training and testing on human trafficking while Kazakhstan and Russia did not
have that support. Ukraine and Kazakhstan both had national plans in combating trafficking,
however, Ukraine additionally had the EU-Ukraine Action Plan and NRM on combating
trafficking supported by the EU. In comparison, the Russian government did not recognize
trafficking problems that remained politicized. The government refused to provide data on
combating efforts due to ties with organized crime and pressure from the international
community and the US. The legal code was inadequate which did not have a universal
definition of sex trafficking. The country did not have a national plan on combating
trafficking and there is no internal data on trafficking cases. With that being said, Russia has
the worst position among the other two countries in terms of prosecution, victim protection,
legal code adequacy and legislation in general.
Corruption, the last push factor of sex trafficking, remains a serious problem in
Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. There are slight differences according to the Global
96
Corruption Index where Kazakhstan was in the better place (94 among 180 countries with
scores of 38 out of 100) than others. Russia was titled to be the most corrupt government in
Europe followed by Ukraine. However, all three countries share the same historical
background of the USSR’s rule of law which followed Tsarist Russia. Up until now,
corruption remains a part of the culture. Corruption is a stumbling block for the development
of the region which is rooted in all spheres of life such as education, healthcare, police,
courts, border control officers and business-related sectors. Moreover, corruption is one of
the main push factors found in this research that contribute to the sex trafficking flow from
the FSU. It is one of the reasons these countries remain caught in the lowest tiers of the TIP
Report by the US Department of State. Additionally, it was found that corrupt government
officials have strong ties with an organized crime, not only because they have a “share” of the
“business” but also they fear being punished by the Russian mafia.
97
Chapter Four: Recommendations to combat sex trafficking as
forced labor from their countries of origin.
Sex trafficking in women is a human rights violation that must be combated at the
national and international levels. The previous chapters identified the push factors conducive
to sex trafficking. There is no optimal solution for the push factors and their dimensions, it is
a complex and multidimensional task. The problem of sex trafficking cannot wait until the
economies of the FSU countries recover so women gain equally paid jobs and respect in
society. The international community must actively confront the sex trafficking flow of
women from the FSU. Anti-trafficking strategies have to be implemented in every policy area
from improving women’s role in the society to increasing salaries of border control officers
in order to reduce bribery. We cannot see the problem of sex trafficking as something that
can be resolved by a few taskforces and special units. Since this issue is global, international
organizations are to stop it on the basis of universal standards of international treaties through
“victim-approach” to trafficking. These standards are highlighted in the main anti-human
trafficking measure - the UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in
Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention
Against Transnational Organized Crime, which obliges member states to combat trafficking
on national and international levels. Interestingly enough, there are some weaknesses found
in this treaty and that is the fact that it is an optional protocol with no enforcement
mechanism and no sanctions imposed on not taking enforcement measures (Crookham, 2005,
p. 21). With that being said, I hypothesize that selected countries are holding a passive
position in implementing recommendations to prevent sex trafficking on a national level due
to a lack of obligations to pay penalty. However, the purpose of this thesis is tackling the
roots of sex trafficking. Drawing from the research results found in Chapter three, this
98
chapter highlights the importance of implementing measures advocated by international
organizations and provides further recommendations for remedial action.
Economic factors and Poverty level.
In Chapter three on Kazakhstan and Russia, acute dimensions of regional poverty
disparity, gender income gaps and high rate of unemployment were identified as main
economic factors affecting women’s standard of living. Ukraine faces the same problems, in
addition to the economic burden due to the annexation of Crimea, the war in Donbas and its
dependence on Russian oil and gas.
When communism had collapsed, Asia was as abundant in labor as emerging Europe
was in capital. Eurasia was abundant in natural resources making it easier for its transition
(World Bank, 2017, p. 2). Ukraine was a hybrid of weak economic indicators trapped in a
conflict and being a potential candidate to become a member of the EU, NATO and the
OECD, so it has a unique situation in human development, but also has the support of the
international community.
The World Bank is an important actor in the post-Soviet Union which helps to develop
strategies of transforming into a modern society with an open, diversified and knowledge-
based economy. As discussed previously that Kazakhstan and Russia are in a privileged
position of abundance in natural resources which are controlled by the government and
oligarchs, the World Bank recommends economic reforms that will support a resilient and
sustainable economy by limiting the dominance of large state-owned enterprises in oil and
gas sectors, strengthening public sector institutions, reinforcing the rule of law and social
protection. “Reducing the government role and power in deciding the allocation of resources”
is the main recommendation that can also be applied to the role of top government officials
and oligarchs that have ties with the mafia (World Bank, “Kazakhstan. Russia. Overview”).
99
The World Bank also encourages addressing the challenges by setting policy principles: 1.
move toward equal protection of all workers, no matter their type of employment, gender,
ethnicity; 2. provide universal social assistance, social insurance, basic quality services; 3.
support progressivity in a broad tax base that complements labor income taxation with the
taxation of capital” (World Bank, “In Eurasia Labor, Taxation, and Social Policies Must Be
Upgraded to Address Rising Inequality, Says World Bank,” 2018). I think a broad tax base
reform will help to reduce a social gap between oligarchs and the poor, while equal access to
opportunities based on geography will help to reduce regional poverty disparity.
The IMF suggests investing in women of Eastern Europe and Central Asia which leads
to increasing productivity and reducing poverty and inequality. For example, a sample of 2
million companies across 34 European countries showed that companies with gender
diversity in senior positions achieve higher profits (IMF cited by OECD, 2019, p. 2).
The OECD suggests: 1. strengthen women’s participation in the labor force in terms of
revising laws of certain job positions that women cannot pursue. For example, the Ministry of
Health restricted 450 professions for women; 2. narrow the gender gap by supporting wage
transparency and develop a system of affordable childcare (OECD, 2019, p. 5-6). In order to
achieve developing affordable childcare, all three countries have to ratify the ILO Convention
183 Maternity Protection and ILO Convention 189 on Domestic Workers. These
implementations will strengthen women’s role in society by establishing gender equality,
financial independence, and social protection by getting social benefits such as health
insurance and discounted childcare.
The IMF policy recommendations for Ukraine’s economic situation during the war are
the following: 1. Some fiscal space has to be available in order to support economic recovery
by prioritizing transparent public spending in urgent healthcare needs in the conflict zone,
protect employment, and provide social assistance. 2. Monetary and exchange rate policies
100
have to be stabilized in order to reduce the inflation rate. With that being said, Ukraine’s
market stability depends on “maintaining hard-won improvements to institutional
frameworks” (IMF Country Report, 2020, p. 5). However, in 2019, the IMF encouraged the
government of Ukraine to make reforms in the legal framework, reduce corruption and
criticized the country’s economy dominated by state-owned enterprises and oligarchs (Radio
Free Europe “Ukraine court halts PrivatBank hearing,” 2019).
In sum, the economic stability in all three countries has to be improved by restructuring
the system of oligarchs, introducing the competitive market for foreign investment with wage
transparency, equal pay, social assistance and a broadening of the tax base.
Social and cultural factors.
Gender inequality. As described in Chapter three gender inequality in the FSU remains
a serious problem that impacts women’s role in society. In this regard, the UN and the OECD
provide public assistance in the field by implementing programs that keep women of
Kazakhstan and Ukraine active in learning about their rights, finding jobs, healthcare,
building entrepreneurships. Moreover, there are annual reports with recommendations for
governments of Kazakhstan and Ukraine published on UN Women and OECD websites. The
OECD’s 2015 Recommendation of the Council on Gender Equality in Public Life includes
instruments for women’s role in government, parliament and judicial system. The FSU
governments are encouraged to develop national gender strategies, regulatory gender impact
assessment, gender budgeting and policies in women’s access to management positions. The
proportion of women in public services and diverse business sectors have to be equal in
higher and lower positions (OECD, 2019, p. 7). Another important suggestion is to support
“non-standard work” opportunities such as part-time, self-employment and home-based jobs
(OECD, 2019, p. 6-7). I think these types of entrepreneurs have to gain a proper social
101
protection system in terms of taxes and benefits. That way women will remain employed,
independent and socially protected.
UN Women’s recommendations for the Kazakhstan government are the following: 1.
develop and implement national and sectoral programs to engage socially vulnerable women
to do the business; 2. improve the public and business environment for socially vulnerable
women. UN Women and Ministry of National Economy had implemented a project for rural
unemployed women, women with disabilities and HIV, single mothers, mothers of several
children, domestic violence victims and internally displaced women (UN Women,
“Kazakhstan”). Interestingly enough, UN Women is not represented in Russia.
Rise of domestic violence. According to the World Bank’s ranking called “Women,
Business and the Law,” women of the FSU have limited access to courts (World Bank cited
by OECD, 2019, p. 7). In this regard, the OECD recommends: 1. create an anti-
discrimination commission, increase awareness and training for judicial system workers; 2.
develop legal aid in civil-family matters; 3. promote quotas on women in parliaments; 4.
ensure that the selection process in the judicial system is open and transparent (OECD, 2019,
p. 9).
I would also add that the Russian government has to criminalize domestic violence
even if it is less than a serious injury like broken bones. Additionally, I recommend all three
countries to reconsider the traditional gender stereotypes of “beating means loving” (biet
znachit lyubit). There has to be zero-tolerance for violence against women. UN Women
suggests Kazakhstan and Ukrainian governments to create an effective prevention system,
inter-agency coordination, affordable and quality services for domestic violence victims,
improved crisis centers (UN Women, “Kazakhstan,” “Ukraine”). I would also add that
Ukraine needs to ratify the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention on Preventing and
Combating Violence against Women.
102
The OECD Development Center suggests policies on labor equity for the Russian
government: 1. the law that addresses gender-based discrimination in job advertisements,
recruitment, selection and hiring process, promotions. 2. the law that defines sexual
harassment in the workplace 3. collect gender-disaggregated data on the contribution of
unpaid care work to the national economy (OECD, 2019, p. 213).
Discrimination against ethnic minorities. Russia and Ukraine both have signed and
ratified the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in 1998 which
obliges member states to protect ethnic minorities. However, the Russian Constitution,
Criminal Code and Labor Code contain anti-discrimination provisions but the country still
had not adopted the actual legislation that assists victims of discrimination. In this regard, the
Council of Europe suggests: 1. adopt the legislation guaranteeing protection 2. improve the
social and economic situation for vulnerable ethnic groups in terms of equal access to the job
market and equal pay rate; 3. provide funding for cultural activities for national minorities; 4.
investigate and prosecute crimes motivated by racial, ethnic or religious hatred (Council of
Europe, Resolution CM/ResCMN(2007)7).
The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) recommends
Ukraine: 1. include discrimination against sexual orientation and gender identity in the
Criminal Code; 2. prosecute crimes based on racial, ethnic, religious and sexual belonging
(ECRI, “Conclusions on Ukraine,” 2020). ECRI underlined the rights of Roma in Russia in
the report of 2019 and provided a list of recommendations on how to treat this ethnic group.
Other ethnic minorities have not been mentioned (ECRI, 2019, p. 26-28). Neither the Council
of Europe nor the ECRI monitor and assist Kazakhstan in legislative reforms in regards to
discrimination against ethnic minorities.
All three countries signed and ratified the International Convention on the Elimination
of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, but they still need to improve anti-discrimination
103
efforts on a national level. The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial
Discrimination (CERD) recommends Ukraine to combat discrimination against ethnicity
during the conflict: 1. prevent racist hate speech and propaganda in the media and Internet; 2.
address poor living conditions of Roma; 3. protect internally displaced people (OHCHR,
“Ukraine to face review by UN Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination,” 2019).
The CERD also recommended Russia to provide equal economic and social rights such as
housing, education, employment, and healthcare to vulnerable ethnic groups including Roma
(ECRI, 2019, p. 26).
Kazakhstan has ratified all human rights treaties and has anti-discrimination provisions
in the Criminal Code, Civil Code, and Labor Code. However, the UN experts reported that
there is no anti-discrimination legislation yet. Moreover, according to the Kazakh
government, courts have never received any cases based on discrimination against ethnicity
(Refworld, “Kazakhstan: Situation of Russian minorities; state protection and support
services,” 2016). There are no recommendations found from international organizations on
this particular issue, however, experts and scholars (Wilkinson, 2000; Daminov, 2020) argue
that Kazakhstan has to establish a body that represents all ethnic minorities living in the
country. Moreover, it is recommended to provide ethnic quotas for public service and two or
three ministers in the Parliament representing ethnic minorities. On top of that, it is important
to increase the awareness of the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan and the government’s
policy documents on the legal protection of ethnic minorities’ rights (Daminov, 2020, p.
141).
Return to traditions and culture. As discussed in Chapter three on Kazakhstan and
Russia, bride kidnapping is considered as one of the human rights violations caused by
returning to traditions and culture. However, Russian Law criminalized this custom (3-8
years in prison), while Kazakhstan holds a passive position towards adopting any legislation
104
on this issue. According to “The Act, The Means, and the Purpose Model” on human
trafficking in international law, the act of kidnapping a woman can be categorized as “by
means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of
deception…” and, “genuine bride thief” meets the first requirement of human trafficking in
the Protocol definition (Conway, “Bride Abductions in Kazakhstan and Human Trafficking
Discourse: Tradition vs. Moral Acuity,” 2018). Moreover, The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (Articles 3, 4, 5, 9 and 12) defines kidnapping as a form of slavery. In the
words of a lawyer L. Handrahan: “Bride kidnapping is the forced capture of a woman, against
her will, who is then removed from her environment and forced by threat of violence,
extending to loss of life, to work in servitude, at the bidding of the man and his family who
have captured her (Handrahan, 2020, p. 5). Additionally, both Kazakhstan and Russia ratified
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), The International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the Supplementary Convention on the
Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery
(Supplementary Convention on Slavery) which oblige member states to respect and protect
human rights in any forms. Unfortunately, I found no recommendations by international
organizations, however, I recommend governments enter international conventions,
declarations and international law standards into the national legislation, increase awareness
of protection against bride kidnapping and human rights violations such as torture and slavery
that accompanies this custom.
Polygamous marriage is another dimension of social and cultural factors that are
considered as human rights violations in Kazakhstan and some parts of Russia. It is illegal to
practice this religious tradition in both countries, however, patriarchal norms dominate in
society and Muslim men secretly take up to four wives. Some women are underage girls
coming from poor families or orphanages. Kazakhstan’s legislation is tricky about
105
polygamous marriage, it is illegal but at the same time, it is not punishable. Moreover,
Kazakh lawmakers have tried to legalize polygamy in 2001 and 2008 but luckily it failed
(Gizitdinov, “Polygamy offers young women of Kazakhstan a ticket out of poverty,” 2013).
There are no specific recommendations addressed on this issue in Kazakhstan and Russia,
however, the UN criticized the practice of polygamy that “violates women’s rights and
infringes their right to dignity” (Gizitdinov, “Polygamy offers young women of Kazakhstan a
ticket out of poverty,” 2013). The UN also obliged all member states of the CEDAW (Article
3) to make changes in the national laws that “guarantee women’s basic rights and freedoms.”
(UN, Press-release WOM/977, 1997). With that being said, I recommend both governments
implement legislation and programs on a national level to prevent violence and social
discrimination against women. Additionally, increasing awareness and tackling this problem
from the human rights perspective is essential.
Women in the armed conflict zone. Gender-based violence during the armed conflict
in Ukraine is a serious human rights problem. Domestic violence is aggravated by the conflict
and women are sexually abused by members of military force in Donbas (Amnesty
International, “Ukraine: not a private matter: domestic and sexual violence against women in
Eastern Ukraine,” 2020). In this regard, UN Women developed The Strategy for Prevention
of and Response to the Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Ukraine along with the UN
Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on
European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of
Justice of Ukraine. The main recommendations of the strategy are following: 1. provide
strategic, technical and policy advice to support institutions of Ukraine; 2. monitor,
investigate, to collect evidence of gender-based violence 3. increase awareness among
communities and vulnerable groups; 4. medical and psychological assistance to victims; 5.
train the police, security sector, social protection sector and armed forces on combating
106
sexual violence and protection of women’s rights. Additionally, international organizations
urged to make reforms in legislation adding “sexual violence” in the code of conduct of
armed forces. It also has to be included in national regulations and local law (UN Women,
2018, p.15-16). I think besides policymaking and legislative reforms, the Ukrainian
government has to recognize the problem of sexual violence as a priority task in the conflict
zone and to increase awareness and decrease the phenomenon of victim-blaming.
In sum, I would like to underline the importance of the feminism movement in the
FSU, especially in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Since there is a lack of feminists in the FSU due
to a fear of threats, social stigma and dominance of patriarchal norms in men-dominated
governments. Feminism activists and NGOs are the first responders of gender-related issues
that provide assistance and all kinds of support to victims, increase awareness of this issue
and advocate for women’s rights on a national and international level. They are a bridge
between governments and international organizations. In this regard, governments of these
three countries are encouraged to be open to cooperating with social justice activists in terms
of protecting women’s rights and minority groups. Governments also have to recognize the
importance of collective efforts of the international community, implement all required
recommendations and be open to reform.
Environmental problems.
All three countries have common environmental issues that create migration patterns.
In that context, IOM addresses the needs of migrants in terms of support policies at
international and national levels. Since Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine are member states,
they are encouraged to follow IOM Strategic Vision 2019-2023 which includes challenges
caused by climate change and environmental degradation. The strategy includes
recommendations for migration-related areas such as labor migration, border management,
107
return to a homeland and adaptation, internal displacement, human trafficking and integration
of diasporas. Member states have to recognize the phenomenon of climate refugees and how
to respond to this in terms of humanitarian assistance, health care, housing, education, and
mainly building a sustainable environment for people.
Oil and gas production areas. All three countries signed and ratified United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol, the Convention
on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, the Aarhus Protocol on Heavy Metals, the
Gothenburg Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone, the
Paris Agreement. As discussed in Chapter three, Kazakhstan and Russia stabilize their
economies through oil and gas sectors which on the other hand lead to ecological damages
and health issues. However, Kazakhstan and Russian laws cover natural resources
exploration and utilization rather than clean energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Ironically, despite the participation in all the environmental conventions and protocol,
creating laws in codes, both countries continue making state-owned oil businesses prosperous
and not protecting people who live in these areas (IISD, 2018, p. 46). According to the United
Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Kazakhstan as one of the leaders of
the mining, fossil fuel and oil producers became a frontrunner in adopting the green economy
approach in 2013. In the meantime, Ukraine as a candidate to become an EU member shows
its willingness “to harmonize its legislation with the EU’s principles of environment
protection (UNECE, 2019, p. 1).
Kazakhstan has received the following recommendations: 1. sustainable development
in using the oceans, seas and marine resources; 2. protect and restore ecosystems, forests,
combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss.
Moreover, the government should establish a ministry that would be responsible for policy
development, control and implementation in the areas of environmental protection in oil and
108
gas areas. The government also encouraged to adopt a national plan on using natural
resources and ensure that companies invest in programs that reduce pollution (UNECE, 2019,
p. 64). I agree with the strategy of the UNECE on the green economy which will help to
stabilize health conditions in Western Kazakhstan and reduce the pattern of moving to
another country and thus making it less vulnerable for women.
According to the UN, one of the priority issues of Russian environmental policy is the
elimination of environmental damage in the past and current issues related to energy
consumption and hazardous waste (UN, 2012, p. 23). In this regard, Russia’s major gas
producer GazProm adopted energy efficiency programs that aimed to reduce the energy
consumption of natural gas, fuel fossil and coal that produce harmful pollutants. The UN
recommends the Russian government to continue the path of energy savings in terms of
moving to gas as motor fuels in order to reduce the use of petrol (UN, 2012, p. 26).
Additionally, it was suggested to promote alternative energy sources; implement tax policies
that help to reduce greenhouse gases by 30%; to protect national reservoirs, forests as a part
of sustainable development (UN, 2012, p. 27).
Nuclear catastrophes in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. The UN, including the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic
Radiation, and the World Bank, as well as the Governments of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine,
organized a forum on consequences of Chernobyl disaster. The concerns on contaminated
areas, a “victim” or “exposed person” mentality, health care system and poverty level were
addressed. Ukraine received the following recommendations: 1. support local development so
people’s mentality will be changed with confidence in their future 2. In the health system,
109
existing screening programs of cancer from radiation should be evaluated and cancer
treatment - supported by the government; 3. restrictions on harvesting of food products in the
areas of radiation. Public awareness on certain food products, cooking methods that reduce
radiation; 4. a strategy that promotes healthy lifestyles based on expertise of health care
workers and community leaders (UN, “Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident,” 2005).
Additionally, European Neighborhood Policy Action Plan established the EU-Ukraine
Council that urged Ukraine “to set the overall basis for government actions to protect the
environment and integrate any environmental concerns into economic reform in Ukraine”
(UNECE, 2007, p. 25). I would also add that governments of Ukraine and Russia need to
reconsider the phenomenon of “exposed person” which is based on a victim mentality
creating patterns for bullying and abandonment, and to increase awareness in terms of
normalizing this status.
On the International Day against Nuclear Tests, UN Secretary-General Antonio
Guterres noted “First, to pay tribute to the victims of the nuclear test site in Semipalatinsk
and second, to raise awareness of the continued threat that such tests pose to the environment
and international security” (UN, “Nuclear testing has disastrous consequences for people and
planet, General Assembly told,” 2019). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
experts recommend the government of Kazakhstan: 1. improve social and economic
development in the areas of radiation; 2. analyze drinking water supply and provide clean
water; 3. provide protection and resettlement for semi-nomadic communities living near
Semipalatinsk; 4. food security and food preparation methods to reduce the radiation; 5.
permanent resettlement for “exposed” people is must if the lifetime dose is over 70 years,
according to the international radiation standards called Basic Safety Standards (BSS) (IAEA,
1998, p. 26-28). Indeed, social and economic development in the radiation areas of
Semipalatinsk along with remediation will help to repatriate migrated people, create safe
110
living conditions and jobs. Additionally, I will add the importance of increasing awareness in
addressing mental issues when “exposed” people experience abandonment and bullying due
to their disability and health concerns. These people have to get special mental therapy
assistance, equal job opportunities and certain social benefits including longer vacation days,
health insurance and community group meetings.
The Aral Sea catastrophe. The international community did not take action during the
Soviet era, but once Central Asian republics gained sovereignty in 1991, the UNEP provided
an action plan on rehabilitation and development of the disaster zone, water management of
the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya rivers, institutions for planning and implementing these
strategies. The World Bank along with interstate organizations took the lead in the 10-year
ambitious project that contains 7 programs costing $72 million. The major investors were the
EU, the Japanese Policy and Human Resource Development Fund, the United Nations
Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), and
others (Small, Bunce, 2003, p.63-64). The UN focused on poverty reduction and launched a
program of humanitarian assistance which helped to access water supplies, build microcredit
enterprises and strengthen local capacity through education, nutrition, and health (Grabish,
“Dry tears of the Aral Sea,” 1999). I also think that both the World Bank and the UN have
provided financial support to the region of the Aral Sea, but it is questionable how the
government of Kazakhstan used this money due to lack of experience and democracy in
general.
In 2000, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) presented an action plan “Water-related vision for the Aral Sea basin for the year
2025” that included consumption of water; using alternative cotton species that require less
water; promoting non-agricultural economic development; using fewer chemicals on the
cotton (UNESCO, Division of Water Sciences, 2000).
111
In 2018, Antonio Guterres was the first UN-Secretary General to visit the Aral Sea and
has urged countries to invest in a new initiative that includes reducing vulnerability,
sustainable development, and creating good living conditions for millions of people of the
Aral Sea region. The meeting was organized by governments of Japan, Nigeria, Norway, and
Uzbekistan alongside the UN Human Security Unit, the UN Country Team in Uzbekistan,
and the UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (“UN launches new fund to advance sustainable
development in the Aral Sea region,” 2018). This initiative gives hope for the future not only
on the restoration of the Aral Sea basin and recovery of nature but also assistance for people
who got harmed, displaced, and lost their jobs.
The UNDP has been working in the region for 20 years and it has built the Aral Forest
reserve to protect species and to “green” villages in the region. The organization also
introduced new crops that require less water and helped local species continue to live in the
region (UNDP “Can the Aral Sea make a comeback?” 2016). Additionally, the UNDP has
launched the project “Help the people of Aral help themselves'' that provided seminars on
business planning and fundraising for more than 1500 people; 83 people received a grant for
small businesses amounting to $1.5 million; 18 UN Volunteer specialists worked on a
microcredit project for businesses run by women. Moreover, 23 NGOs helped to address
socio-economic and environmental issues in their communities (UNDP “Can the Aral Sea
make a comeback?” 2016).
I would also add an important recommendation to build a health infrastructure in the
Aral Sea region so local people do not have to travel to bigger cities across the country. The
health assistance in the region has to include necessary medications, lung diagnostic due to
dust storms, equipment, and health professionals that meet all international health protocols
and requirements.
112
The armed conflict in Donbas. The UNEP reported the conflict in Donbas has
damaged ecosystems within an area of at least 530,000 hectares, including 18 nature reserves
covering an area of 80,000 hectares. More than 150,000 hectares of forests have been
impacted with 12,500 forest fires blazing through the military operations zone and adjacent
areas. In the words of Erik Solheim, head of the UNEP, “Effectively protecting the
environment against the horrors of armed conflict and supporting equitable governance of
natural resources is an important step on the path to development, prosperity, and sustainable
peace” (UNEP, “Ukraine’s Donbas bears the brunt of toxic armed conflict,” 2018). However,
the UNEP did not include Donbas in environmental programs of disasters and conflicts. Yet I
will utilize the recommendations of experts from the National Endowment for Democracy
(NED) to the government of Ukraine to take the following steps which I found addressed in a
well-organized manner: 1. create a national environmental fund for the monitoring, protection
of high-risk areas of Donbas; 2. create a committee for the protection of vulnerable
industries; 3. develop a national plan addressing environmental impacts of the armed conflict
in Eastern Ukraine; 3. create an educational curriculum on this issue for military officials.
Furthermore, it is suggested for militants to create “a green corridor for inspections of tailing
ponds and other industrial facilities that are located in the area between the two forces”
(NED, 2019, p. 6).
Weak governance and the lack of legal protection.
Kazakhstan. Previous chapters described the importance of reforming the legal system
in order to tackle the problem of sex trafficking. Since I used the reports of the US
Department of State throughout the research, I will use its well-structured recommendations
as well. I have chosen the main recommendations that can be applied to the legal system of
Kazakhstan. With that being said, the US Department of State addressed following concerns
113
and recommendations between 2001 and 2019: 1. strengthen anti-trafficking legislation in
terms of increasing convictions and penalties for traffickers 2. increase victim assistance
funds 3. more training for law enforcement and judges 4. investigate and prosecute
government officials that involved in sex trafficking who have ties with the mafia 5. increase
public awareness on sex trafficking in rural areas; 6. introduce professional ethics training for
law enforcement officers in terms of increasing “a culture of empathy to sex trafficking
victims”; 7. provide government-funded longer-term shelters for trafficking victims; 8.
update laws on trafficking to meet the international standards (TIP Report 2001-2019, US
Department of State). Investigation and prosecution of government officials taking bribes
from the mafia is a fundamental aspect in legislative reforms. I would add increasing jail time
for those who are involved in this umbrella and also withdrawal of the option of monetary
compensation as a lighter form of punishment.
The OSCE Special Representative on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings on the
regional workshops for Central Asia and Eastern Europe addressed the concerns on border
management which I find as the main actor in regulating sex trafficking flows. Additionally
the Kazakhstan government is encouraged to: 1. provide legal assistance to victims in
cooperation with NGOs and the private sector; 2. improve the cross-border connection of
anti-trafficking lawyers in Kazakhstan and countries of transit and destination; 3. exchange of
expertise and good practices on “the issues of providing a legal aid to victims'' by lawyers
from different countries; 4. provide compensation for victims (OSCE, 2015, p. 6).
Furthermore, migration officers of Kazakhstan are suggested to inform travelers about the
rules of residing abroad to avoid becoming victims of sex trafficking (OSCE, 2015, p. 14).
School curriculum for ninth graders and up has to include the problem of sex trafficking in
order to avoid risks of being involved in the future (OSCE, 2015, p. 16). On a regional level,
Kazakhstan initiated the Almaty Process, a platform for 9 post-Soviet countries to annually
114
step up their response under the cooperation of the OSCE, the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the IOM (OSCE, 2015, p. 19). Furthermore, I
think the cooperative initiatives and brainstorming techniques from international
organizations will challenge the Kazakhstan government to be active in response by using
innovative methods in combating sex trafficking. I would add that good practices from Tier 1
countries and cross-training within the all FSU countries will be beneficial.
Russia. As mentioned in chapter three, the Russian government did not cooperate in
providing human trafficking data to the US Department of State. However, I selected the
following available recommendations in report archives: 1. create a national strategy that
recognizes the problem of trafficking including victim protection and assistance; 2. training
for law enforcement and judges; 3. implement a comprehensive legislation on victim
assistance; 4. cooperate with NGO community that works with sex trafficking victims; 5.
create a central database for conviction and sentencing of trafficking cases; 6. provide funds
from the national budget on combating this issue and establish an official coordinating body
7. improve efforts on investigation and prosecution of traffickers particularly government
officials who are involved in the sex trafficking circle; 8. training for health officials in
identification of trafficking victims; 9. provide funds for anti-trafficking NGOs that provide
assistance, shelter and protection to victims; 10. public awareness about this issue; 11. create
a law that meets the definition of trafficking with international standards (TIP Report 2001-
2019, US Department of State). Creating a national strategy in recognizing sex trafficking,
setting up the methods in combatting it, and increasing awareness in Russia are essential
recommendations that will dramatically decrease sex trafficking flows internationally,
especially in Europe.
In 2019, the OSCE organized a conference along with international organizations,
NGOs, trade unions, academia and media on the problem of trafficking in Russia. The
115
Russian government was suggested to follow international frameworks and instruments to
prevent human trafficking. Good practices of other countries were presented at the
conference. Due to politicizing the problem of human trafficking, Madina Jarbussynova
OSCE Special Representative and Coordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
argued that Russia has to be proactive in combating trafficking on a national and international
level, and open up to cooperation with the international community. She also encouraged the
Russian government to support the idea of exchanging information on trafficking among
OSCE member states and allow policy-makers to do their jobs in the region (OSCE, “OSCE
and the Russian Federation join efforts to fight human trafficking through public-private
partnerships,” 2017). Essentially, the problem of politicizing trafficking in Russia adds more
problems not only in terms of turning blind eye on a national level but also creates a burden
and difficulties for the international community in setting up the strategies in a global
umbrella.
The Global Slavery Index, a database of slavery maps in the world which was produced
jointly by IOM, ILO, and Walkfree Foundation provided the following recommendations to
the Russian government in regards to legislative reforms: 1. sign and ratify the Council of
Europe Convention on Actions against Trafficking in Human Beings; 2. establish a law
criminalizing forced marriages and protect those who were kidnapped and forced to get
married; 3. publicly report data on victims of trafficking, investigations, prosecutions and
court outcomes; 4. establish shelters for victims and provide training for social workers; 5.
create behavior change programs aimed at patriarchal attitudes that cause sexual exploitation
and forced marriage for women and underage girls (Global Slavery Index, “Russia,” 2018). It
was an important recommendation aimed at the roots of the problem of sexual exploitation in
changing the stigma of patriarchal behavior. I think this will dramatically change the course
116
of the whole mentality of men-dominated society and thinking patterns in that direction.
Women will gain confidence in their rights, respect and security.
Ukraine. Throughout the reporting period of 2001-2019 Ukraine had a positive
evolution in its legislative system with the assistance of the EU. However, there is a lot to
improve. In this regard, the US Department of State provided recommendations to the
Ukrainian government: 1. training to reduce victim-blaming and breaches of victim
confidentiality; 2. create a specialized unit of prosecutors and strengthen their advocacy skills
through training; 3. protect victim’s rights at courts 4; collaborate with anti-trafficking NGOs
and provide funds for services to protect victim assistance and shelter; 5. systematic training
for law enforcement officers and judges; 6. increase efforts in strengthening anti-trafficking
legislation in terms of increasing convictions and penalties for traffickers; 7. improve victim
identification; 8. investigate and prosecute government officials involved in trafficking
crimes and ensure that they receive a proper jail time; 9. improve the collection of data which
divides forced labor and sex trafficking offenses; 10. increase interagency coordination and
cooperation to combat trafficking; 11. increase training for law enforcement and health care
officials on victim identification of vulnerable populations such as internally displaced
persons due to the war; 12. increase training on victim-centered approach and how to gather
information “outside victims’ testimony” for law enforcement officers and judges (TIP
Report 2001-2019, US Department of State). These recommendations will help Ukraine to
improve legislative system which lacks prosecution and investigation of those government
officials involved in sex trafficking business with the mafia. A victim identification
mechanism is another important task to set, especially among internally displaced women in
the conflict zone. Social workers, health care specialists, police and NGOs have to be trained
to identify victims and provide them necessary assistance and protection.
117
As described in Ukraine's country profile, the country receives more international
assistance, strategies and task force units. However, it was found that the government did not
fully complete the strategy on preventing sex trafficking and budget mismanagement was
another issue here. In this regard, there are concerns found on Ukraine’s performance in the
Universal Periodic Review of the UN which also includes recommendations from the OSCE,
NGOs, and members of the UN Human Rights Council: 1. fully implement plans and
programs on combating trafficking. According to findings of NGOs the level of
implementing the national action plan is only 25% of planned actions; 2. allocate adequate
funds to ensure the effective implementation of the Combating Trafficking in Persons Act.
According to findings of NGOs, the state budget is not freely available and there is no budget
breakdown on estimating finances spent for anti-trafficking actions; 3. recognize a victim-
centered approach in regards to women and children from sexual exploitation and abuse; 4.
address the roots causing sex trafficking and increase public awareness on that; 5. establish
shelters for not only rehabilitation purposes but also for social integration of victims; 6.
redouble training for border guards; 7. prepare methodological recommendations for
detecting, screening, registering and investigating crimes; 8. training for judges and
upgrading the qualification of judges in terms of court hearings of sex trafficking cases; 9.
regularly raise awareness among IDPs about the risks of getting trapped to sex trafficking,
provide qualified consultations; 10. to involve monitors of international missions in revealing
the facts of trafficking in disputed territories of Ukraine (UN, 2017, p. 9-10). Since Ukraine
has a unique geographical location in Europe, its disputed territories of Donbas and Crimea,
and not ratified borders with neighbors are major concerns in border control in terms of sex
trafficking flows. With that being said the recommendation given on monitoring and training
national guards and international missions will clear up the existing loopholes on the border
control.
118
Corruption.
One of the UN’s 17 sustainable Goals for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development is combating corruption. All members of the UNCAC are encouraged not only
to enforce laws but also cooperate with the media, the private sector, civil society, academia
to fight against corruption (UN, “Battle against Corruption Vital to 2030 Agenda, General
Assembly President Tells High-level Commemoration of Anti-Corruption Treaty’s
Adoption,” 2018).
Kazakhstan. As discussed in Chapter three on Kazakhstan’s corruption, the country
ratified all international conventions to fight corruption. Moreover, the government is
planning to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Criminal Liability for Corruption, the
Council of Europe Convention on Civil and Legal Liability for Corruption and accede to the
Council of Europe Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO). However, despite the fact
that Kazakhstan has achieved progress in anti-corruption legislation, according to the OECD,
the focus should now be on implementing reforms that meet international anti-corruption
standards. Furthermore, it is recommended to strengthen weak institutions, to create budget
transparency and openness. The interaction of civil society with the state and business has to
without any corruption involved deals throughout the country (OECD cited by Civic
Foundation Transparency Kazakhstan, 2018, p. 38). The OECD also recommends the mass
engagement of civil society to fight corruption and most importantly, people have to be aware
of their rights to do so. For that reason, people are encouraged to learn it at schools and know
the basics of legal knowledge, “Electronic government” and “Open Government” online
services (OECD cited by Civic Foundation Transparency Kazakhstan, 2018, p. 8). The role of
mass media is important to shed light on corruption, state accountability and public
awareness. I would also recommend reforms to freedom of speech in the press due to the fact
that most of the media sources are state-controlled and censored.
119
Since the Kazakhstan government ratified the UNCAC, the Section for Corruption and
Economic Crimes of the UNODC monitors the implementation of the UN Convention and
provides recommendations in the report. Another important document is Istanbul Anti-
Corruption Action Plan by the OECD Anti-Corruption Networks for Eastern Europe and
Central Asia. Based on these two documents significant recommendations to the Kazakhstan
government were found: 1. establish criminal liability for promising, offering, or requesting a
bribe in the public, state, or private sectors; 2. establish criminal liability for taking a bribe in
favor of third parties; 3. impose sanctions for corruption-related offenses in courts according
to international standards and best practices (OECD, 2017, p. 156-160). I think imposing a
penalty for bribes on judges, law enforcement and border control officers that are involved in
sex trafficking umbrella is not enough, they have to be properly investigated and sentenced.
My recommendation is supported by the US Department of State which urged to improve
legislation on the punishment of corrupt officials, increase jail time for receiving a bribe, and
falsification of documents in trafficking related cases (TIP Report, US Department of State,
2006) Additionally, in the Country Reports of Human Rights Practices, the US Department of
State recommends that the Kazakhstan government fight against corruption in the judicial
system and eliminate the concept of “courts are controlled by the interests of the ruling elite.”
(US Department of State, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kazakhstan”).
Russia. The UNCAC was adopted in 2003, however, the Russian Legal Code only
partially met the requirements of the convention. For example, the Criminal Code (Article
290-291) reduces the punishment for corruption. Moreover, certain people have the
protective immunity to prosecution. Another problem with the code is the lack of
criminalization of an offered bribe resulting in penalization of only a completed bribe
(Transparency International, Russia recommends improvements to the implementations of the
UN Convention against Corruption,” 2013). With that being said, despite the fact the
120
government ratified the main anti-corruption documents, it does not mean it follows
international standards. In 2013-2019, the OECD Working Group on Bribery had serious
concerns in regards to Russia’s continued failure to implement legislative anti-corruption
reforms in order to investigate and prosecute the offense of bribery. However, in 2019,
Russia finally entered the third phase of evaluation which met the standards of the OECD
Anti-Bribery Convention (OECD, “Bribery and corruption. Russia”). The OECD similar
recommendations to the Russian government as to Kazakhstan: 1. include the “promising”
and “offering” of a bribe as offenses to the Criminal Code; 2. establish criminal liability for
taking a bribe in favor of third parties; 3. expand the definition of non-material bribes and
include it to the Criminal Code as an offense; 4. adopt legislation that would allow
confiscation of the bride (OECD, 2018, p. 4-6). The element of “promising” and “offering” is
very important and something to be prevented and considered as a serious crime, the same as
a completed action of “giving” a bribe.
In the Country Reports of Human Rights Practices, the US Department of State
recommends that the Russian government take action in fighting against corruption in the
judiciary and legislative system, the same as for Kazakhstan. It is suggested to improve
legislation in punishing government officials for taking bribes and “improper use of official
position to secure personal profits” (US Department of State, “2019 Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices: Russia”).
There are limited recommendations found on combating corruption in the Russian
government from international organizations, but I came across the hypothesis on unrealistic
expectations of “defeating” corruption while there are more positive ways to tackle this issue.
P. Heywood argues that the Russian government should focus on drivers of individual
behavior of people who are involved in corruption and create policy-making at both
121
supranational and subnational levels to address reforms in social norms (Heywood, 2018, p.
91).
Ukraine. As discussed in Chapter three on Ukraine, the government receives
institutional and financial support from the international community in regards to
democratization, preparing for accession to the EU, and humanitarian support during the war.
In this regard, eliminating corruption is the major factor that prevents or makes the process
longer and ineffective. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
encouraged the Ukrainian government to set up priorities for fighting corruption in order to
move towards joining the European Union, they have to be harmonized with the EU
standards, GRECO principles, EU Conventions, the OECD recommendations and the
UNCAC convention (USAID, 2012, p. 18). The USAID suggests key steps in preventing
corruption: 1. provide investigative reporting training to journalists; establish anti-corruption
coalitions among NGOs, business associations, journalists, activists so they can share
experience and promote a reform (USAID, 2012, p. 21) 2. strengthen court administration
procedures and make them transparent by posting publications of court decisions on the web
platform so this will make judges more accountable for their decisions (USAID, 2012, p. 28)
3. implement new legislation that separates public and private interests which improves
transparency in the government (USAID, 2012, p. 41). 4. support civil society programs in
building activism, literacy of their rights and government’s responsibilities; 5. support legal
services to victims of alleged corruption; 6. promote professionalism in regards to specific
job requirements, offering training, performance-based incentives, reporting requirements to
local government officials; 6. promote policies which involve citizens in the decision making
process, create a “public-dialog” in addressing corruption (USAID, 2012, p. 59). The
USAID’s suggestion on cooperation between different types of influential groups that will
122
bring up their own experience of corruption in their field, will help to tackle this issue from
the roots by implementing very detailed reform.
Ukraine received similar recommendations from the US Department of State as
Kazakhstan and Russia on investigating and prosecuting government officials that involved
in sex trafficking flows (TIP Report, US Department of State, 2001-2019). Corruption among
prosecutors and judges was a concern in another report of the US Department of State, where
the Ukrainian government was recommended to take actions in legislative reforms to punish
those officials for taking bribes (US Department of State, “2019 Country Reports on Human
Rights Practices: Ukraine).
After numerous recommendations by the OECD, Ukraine finally criminalized
corruption in the Criminal Code aligned with international standards. However, there is a lot
of work to do in order to withdraw from the status of “the most corrupt European nation.” In
this regard, the OECD recommends taking the following reforms and steps in fighting
corruption: 1. strengthen law enforcement anti-corruption efforts; 2. ensure that national
policy is based on surveys and statistics (OECD, 2015, p. 17). 3. develop an action plan for
the Anti-Corruption Strategy and provide funding for its implementation; 4. conduct
corruption surveys that show long-term developments. The surveys have to be based on
public trust and perception of corruption; (OECD, 2015, p. 27). 5. cooperate with NGOs,
business sector, academia on anti-corruption efforts and good governance. Establish
transparent policy procedures for involving civil society in making decisions (OECD, 2015,
p. 30). 6. coordinate and support bodies working on anti-corruption policy such as the Agent,
the Bureau, the Ministry of Justice, Parliament and the Presidential Administration. (OECD,
2015, p. 37). 7. increase punishments for active and passive bribery; 8. introduce confiscation
of assets in line with best practice (OECD, 2015, p. 61). 9. make changes in the judiciary
system in regards to the status of judges, disciplinary proceedings; provide sufficient and
123
transparent fundings to judges in order to reduce corruption (OECD, 2015, p. 175). I am sure
that transparency and openness to the public, and cooperation with other important actors
such as press and NGOs will slowly but surely reduce the perception of corruption in
Ukraine.
In sum, this chapter offers key recommendations on each factor and sub-factor
(dimension) that contribute to sex trafficking based on documents of the international
organizations that are available on their websites. Most recommendations were found similar
to all three countries in terms of restructuring the system of oligarchs, creating a competitive
market for both genders with equal pay, social assistance and reforming the taxing system.
The common problem of three countries is that they ratify conventions but either they do not
apply them to the codes that criminalize racial and ethnic discrimination, domestic violence,
violence against women or they include required laws in the codes under the international
pressure but decrease the level of punishment or compensation due to corrupt judiciary
system. In this regard, it is important to make reforms in the judiciary system aligned with
international standards and eliminate corruption by increasing salaries of government
officials, and to cooperate with civil society, advocates, journalists, academia, social justice
activists, NGOs. Ties of the mafia and government officials have to be broken and
aggressively investigated, prosecuted and punished with a longer jail time.
Most importantly, these countries of patriarchal norms have to change the stereotypes
of the role of women in society by 1. providing jobs, equal pay, social assistance, legal
protection; and 2. reconsidering the cultural stigma of women with the respect of her rights.
These types of reforms will help to reduce the demand of sexual exploitation and slavery of
women.
124
Chapter Five: Conclusion.
Addressing the roots of sex trafficking from the former Soviet Union.
Sex trafficking is a global problem, and it can be measured by “waves” with the FSU
countries being the latest fourth wave after Thai and Filipino, Dominicans and Colombians,
Ghanaians and Nigerians (De Mauro, 2016, p. 49). As a result of the collapse of the Soviet
Union, the newly independent governments Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine have failed to
adequately address policies, institutions, legal protection, and corrupt government officials
who have ties with the Russian mafia.
If there is a demand to exploit women there will always be a way to sell women
illegally. At this point, the fourth wave was stereotypically understood in terms of demand
which means that receiving countries have to find solutions to prevent sex trafficking flow
into their territories. However, I hypothesize that sending countries have to take into
consideration the push factors impacting the departure of vulnerable women from the FSU.
This thesis research explained why the connection between the FSU countries and sex
trafficking exists, and how to solve this problem on national and international levels through
good governance, strong legal protection, recognizing women’s rights, and eliminating
corruption.
Chapter one and two described the governmental structure, ideology of the USSR that
newly independent countries inherited in the 1990s. The transition from a planned economy
to a market-based economy, from communism to capitalism produced a number of side
effects such as extreme poverty level, shortages of food products, unemployment, corruption
on all levels, the spread of criminal gangs and mafia.
Poverty had always been the main characteristic of Soviet life - working people in the
second class and those who had ties with the government (nomenklatura) enjoyed their status
in society. Another important fact to mention is that while the economy remained shattered
125
and people lived in isolation, the Soviet leaders were focused on the competition with the US
in the Cold War and supported other communist countries. That is why the collapse hit so
hard on the working class, especially on women who had children to take care of.
Additionally, during the Soviet era, women had equal rights, social protection benefits such
as childcare and healthcare were covered by the government. Women were respected in
society according to the ideology of the USSR on independent, working and educated
women. Unfortunately, women’s roles had collapsed along with the whole USSR ideology.
Many women had been beaten up by alcoholic husbands who lost their jobs due to the
collapse. Domestic violence, discrimination against women, gender gap income, return to
cultural and religious practices such as bride abduction and polygamous marriage contributed
to women’s vulnerability and insecurities. Russia still has not criminalized domestic violence
up until now despite the fact of signing and ratifying anti-violence conventions.
The research results proved that environmental problems are a major push factor of
sex trafficking flow even though there are no reports and data available on climate refugees
from the FSU. However, the fact that Kazakhstan and Ukraine had experienced massive
ecological catastrophes such as Chernobyl, the desertification and desiccation of the Aral Sea,
and the Semipalatinsk Test Site cannot be ignored. These catastrophes led to internally
displaced people and migration abroad. Moreover, Ukraine is currently experiencing the
impacts of war in Donbas in people’s health and biodiversity loss. The war also affects the
social life of ethnic minorities such as Roma, Russians, Poles, Jews, and Tatars being
discriminated against for their ethnic background by Eastern Ukrainian patriots. Ukrainian
women in Donbas are placed in an enormous struggle for survival in terms of access to
healthcare, childcare, jobs, and their responsibility to take care of elderly people, children,
and injured soldiers.
126
Weak governance and lack of legal protection is another push factor that showed how
untrained, corrupt government officials are not only blaming victims who enter prostitution
but also profiting from that by helping traffickers to transport women abroad. The corrupt
judiciary, law enforcement and border officers are a serious concern in this mosaic. I would
say more, corruption is found as the most serious threat throughout all push factors and their
dimensions due to the fact that it has roots in all spheres of post-Soviet society up until now.
The research method and recommendations of the international organizations.
The focus of this research has been on showing similarities and differences among
these three countries with the same historical background, cultural and linguistic connection,
and transition in the 1990s. However, it was found in the comparative analysis in Chapters
two and three that the response of all three countries was different in terms of combatting sex
trafficking and becoming a part of the international community, adopting a universal human
rights system to national legislation. Moreover, the response and assistance of international
organizations were different for political and strategic reasons (Chapter 4). For example, on
one hand, Ukraine is more privileged in getting institutional and financial support than
Kazakhstan due to its potential candidacy to become a member of the EU, NATO and OECD.
On the other hand, Russian aggression and the war in Donbas put the country in that needy
position. In the meantime, Russia is playing political games by not taking trafficking as a
serious threat despite the fact the country ratified all required international documents. This
research showed that it is because the Russian government has a strong connection with
organized crime and covers their criminal activities up. Kazakhstan is in the same position to
the least extent but at the same time struggling with the wish to adopt civilized, western
liberal values and to become a part of the developed world in the future.
127
Thus far, attempts by the international community to combat trafficking in the FSU and
Eastern Europe has had limited success. Efforts by the UN, the OECD, the OSCE, and the US
place a massive burden of addressing trafficking on these governments. However, these three
governments cannot apply recommendations due to weak governmental structure and level of
corruption. In this regard, I hypothesize that to combat the roots of sex trafficking,
governments must establish good governance, eliminate corruption, reduce the wide gap
between civil society, academia, journalists and government officials through building
transparency, openness and trust.
In Chapter two, the economic indicators of Russia and Kazakhstan showed the
abundance of oil and gas sectors and moving to the upper-middle-class. I think that this
economically privileged position will help to fight against sex trafficking and organized
crime even with a lack of assistance and support from international organizations. With that
being said, governments are encouraged to produce their own good practices on a national
level to eradicate the roots of this problem.
While the thesis aimed to bring to light the importance of the anti-trafficking efforts
aligned with international standards, the research also highlighted important aspects of
poverty reduction through restructuring the system of oligarchs, introducing the competitive
market for foreign investment with wage transparency, equal pay, social assistance and a
broad tax base. The rule of law, government effectiveness, political stability, the voice of
civil society, the free press, the rise of social justice activism and feminism are also important
aspects in order to create good governance. As for legislation improvement, the “victim-
centered approach,” transparent judiciary system, enforcing laws and national plans, trained
law enforcement in friendly cooperation with NGOs, adopting good practices of other
countries, control of corruption is crucial to a successful fight against sex trafficking.
128
Especially Russia has to make reforms in the legal system and recognize trafficking as a
serious national problem.
It can be concluded from the findings of the thesis, that the push factors and their
dimensions make women vulnerable to sex trafficking. The research has provided evidence
of each factor’s contribution and has offered recommendations to the governments of
Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine to serve its people by providing justice, freedom, security,
economic and political stability. I strongly believe that the influence of these push factors will
be gradually reduced while efforts to combat sex trafficking would be increased.
Thinking of the future...
There is still so much to learn in the future about sex trafficking from the FSU,
specifically about traffickers, pimps, brothel owners, and the Russian mafia. The research
briefly highlighted the link between sex trafficking and organized crime, and also routes of
trafficking. However, I think that more detailed research on combating organized crime in
terms of sex trafficking will be an important contribution to future research. Overall, there are
other important aspects to learn about: 1. How wealthy receiving countries combat sex
trafficking from the FSU? What is the role of international organizations in connection with
sending and receiving countries? 2. What are the prevention and victim protection
mechanisms practiced in the FSU? What can be improved with the help of NGOs and raising
awareness? 3. What is the “victim-centered approach?” 4. What is the victim profile? What
are the psychological and physical problems victims face once they get trapped?
Finally, these research questions can help to build solid future research and open the
door to more and better understanding of the problem of sex trafficking from the former
Soviet Union and methods to combat it.
129
Bibliography. Agyeman, Julian and Yelena Ogneva-Himmelberger. “Environmental Justice and
Sustainability in the Former Soviet Union” Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2009. 296 pp. ISBN:
978-0-262-51233-6
Amnesty International, “Ukraine: not a private matter: domestic and sexual violence against
women in Eastern Ukraine,” 2020
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur50/3255/2020/en/
Anand, R.K., “Environmental Change and Forced Migration: A Critical Issue of
Kazakhstan”, 2013, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online):
2319-7064
Ashwin, Sarah (ed.). 2006. Adapting to Russia’s New Labour Market: Gender and
Employment Behaviour. New York: Routledge.
Appel, Hilary; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2018). From Triumph to Crisis: Neoliberal Economic
Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-
1108435055.
Azarov, “Shadow trade accounts for 40% of domestic markets,” Interfax Ukraine, 2011
https://interfax.com.ua
130
Ayres, Sabra “Amid staggering destruction, Eastern Ukraine looks to rebuild,” Al-Jazeera
2014 http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/28/east-ukraine-reconstruction.html
Bauer, Susanne; Gusev, Boris I.; Pivina, Ludmila M.; Apsalikov, Kazbek N.; Grosche, Bernd
(2005-01-01). "Radiation Exposure Due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear
Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical
Cohort, 1960-1999". Radiation Research. 164 (4): 409–419. doi:10.1667/rr3423.1
Bloch, Alexia. “Victims of trafficking or entrepreneurial women? Narratives of post-Soviet
entertainers in Turkey”, Vol 22, No 3-4 (2003)
Badikova, Katerina. "An Analysis of the Legal Framework Governing Prosecution of
Traffickers and Victim Protection in Central Asian Countries." Connections 4, no. 4 (2005):
29-38. Accessed October 23, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323194.
Bazaliuk, Oleg “Corruption in Ukraine: Rulers’ Mentality and the Destiny of the Nation,
2016” ISBN (10): 1-4438-9689-6
Borison, Georgia “Economic inequality in Russia” 2019, University of Colorado Boulder,
Political Science
https://www.colorado.edu/polisci/2019/04/26/economic-inequality-russia
131
Breslow, Jason M “Inequality and the Putin Economy: Inside the number,” Frontline 2015
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/inequality-and-the-putin-economy-inside-the-
numbers/
Bridger, Sue, Rebecca Kay, and Kathryn Pinnick. 1995. No More Heroines? Russia, Women
and the Market. New York: Routledge.
Burnashev, Rustam. "Terrorist Routes in Central Asia: Trafficking Drugs, Humans, and
Weapons." Connections 6, no. 1 (2007): 65-70. Accessed October 23, 2020.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323280.
Busuncian, Tatiana. "Terrorist Routes in South Eastern Europe." Connections 6, no. 1 (2007):
85-102. Accessed October 23, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323282.
Bullough, Oliver “Welcome to Ukraine, the most corrupt nation in Europe,” The Guardian,
2015 https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/feb/04/welcome-to-the-most-corrupt-nation-
in-europe-ukraine
Britannica, “Organized crime” https://www.britannica.com/topic/organized-crime
BBC News, “The economy of Russia: IMF’s biggest failure,” 1999
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/455673.stm
132
Byrne, “Jackpot,” Kyiv Post, 2010 https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-
politics/jackpot-62564.html
Crookham, Megan Korrin “Combating human-trafficking through the fundamental
establishment of good governance: the case of Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union”,
B.S., University of California, Los Angeles 2004
Cheema, G. Shabbir. (2005). Building democratic institutions: governance reform in
developing countries. Kumarian Press Inc. New York, NY.
Cherniavska, Irina “Ecological Problems in Ukraine” National University of Food
Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2013
http://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/15658/1/Cherniavska.pdf
Conwoy “Bride Abductions in Kazakhstan and Human Trafficking Discourse: Tradition vs
Moral Acuity” 2018, The Ohio State University
https://u.osu.edu/conway240hseportfolio/2018/06/21/h/
Constitution of the USSR, Article 122
https://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/36cons04.html
133
CIA “The World Factbook: Russia” https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/russia/
Civic Foundation Transparency Kazakhstan, “REPORT ON THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION IN KAZAKHSTAN (THE VIEWPOINT OF CIVIL SOCIETY),” 2018
https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/kproducts/REPORT-ON-THE-
PREVENTION-OF-CORRUPTION-IN-KAZAKHSTAN.pdf
Daminov, Ildar “Reassessing classification of Kazakhstan’s ethnic management model: A
comparative approach” Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2020;11(2):133-143.
doi:10.1177/1879366520925337
Davydova, Angelina. “Russia wants to protect from climate change without reducing carbon
emissions,” Science, 2017. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/russia-wants-protect-
itself-climate-change-without-reducing-carbon-emissions
Dunn, Guy “Major Mafia gangs in Russia”, in Phil Williams (Ed.), Russian Organized
Crime: The New Threat? London: Frank Cass, 2000, pp. 63-87
Dean, Laura and Anastasia Dovgaia “The politics of Russia’s approach to human
trafficking,” 2017 https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-politics-russias-approach-to-
human-trafficking
De Mauro, Anthony “The Russian Connection: How Russia Became a Leader in the World's
Human Trafficking Market” University of Central Florida, 2016
134
De Leo, Maryann “The First Nuclear Refugees Come Home”, 2007
https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/the-first-nuclear-refugees-come-home
Ekmanis, Indra. The Week “Russia’s growing feminist movement from The World,” 2019
https://theweek.com/articles/846866/russias-growing-feminist-movement
Engel, Barbara Alpern. "Women in Russia and the Soviet Union." Signs 12, no. 4 (1987):
781-96. Accessed February 1, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174213.
EIA, “Country Analysis Briefs. Russia: Environmental Issues,” 2004
https://www.lehman.edu/faculty/rwhittaker/Day02-
Research/Russia_%20Environmental%20Issues.pdf
Ernst & Young, EY Fraud “Detailed results,” 2017
https://web.archive.org/web/20181107104015/https://fraudsurveys.ey.com/ey-global-fraud-
survey-2018/detailed-results/
Finckenauer, James O. and Voronin, Yuri O. “The Threat of Russian Organized Crime”,
2001, NCJ 187085 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs
135
Financial Times “Kazakhs battle to stave off chill in from Russian steppe,” 2014
https://www.ft.com/content/c4a55aa6-dd04-11e3-b73c-00144feabdc0#axzz3mCiNSOzr
Freedom House, “Nations in Transit 2016:Europe and Eurasia Brace for Impact,” 2016
https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit
Forina, Anastacia “Kyivans join global rally to end violence against women,” Kyiv Post 2013
https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/kyivans-join-global-rally-to-end-
violence-against-women-320424.html?cn-reloaded=1
Ghodsee, Kristen. “Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism” 2017, Duke
University Press. pp. 63–64. ISBN 978-0822369493
Global Corruption Report, 2008, Chapter 7.4 p. 280
https://web.archive.org/web/20100903050811/http://www.transparency.org/content/downloa
d/32778/502137
Global Slavery Index, “Russia,” 2018,
https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/country-studies/russia
Glenn, E. Curtis, ed. Russia: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress,
1996 http://countrystudies.us/russia/
136
Gizitdinov, Nariman “Polygamy offers young women of Kazakhstan a ticket out of poverty,”
Independent, 2013 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/polygamy-offers-
young-women-kazakhstan-ticket-out-poverty-8991759.html
Grabbish, Beatrice “Dry Tears of Aral”, UN Chronicle 1999,
https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/dry-tears-aral
Howard, Russell D.; Traughber, Colleen M. “The routes of terrorism and trafficking from
Central Asia to Western Europe”. Connections, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-4
Handrahan, L.M. “Implications of International Human Rights Law and Bride Kidnapping in
Kyrgyzstan” 2020 https://sites.tufts.edu/praxis/files/2020/05/Handrahan.pdf
Heywood, Paul M. "Combating Corruption in the Twenty-First Century: New Approaches."
Daedalus 147, no. 3 (2018): 83-97. Accessed March 19, 2021. doi:10.2307/48563082.
Hughes, Donna. 2000. “The “Natasha” trade: The transnational shadow market of trafficking
in women,”Journal of International Affairs, 53(2): 625–651.
Human Rights First, “Hate Crime Survey: Ukraine,” 2008
https://web.archive.org/web/20091111094926/http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/discriminatio
n/reports.aspx?s=ukraine&p=violentatt
137
Institute for War and Peace Reporting, Kazakhstan as Human Trafficking Route, 21
November 2011, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ecf57862.html [accessed 24
November 2020]
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD),”Clean Energy Investment in the
Former Soviet Union (Ukraine and Kazakhstan). The domestic context,” 2008
http://www.iisd.org/
Isayev, Ruslan “In Chechnya, attempts to eradicate bride abduction,” 2007 by Prague
Watchdog http://www.watchdog.cz/?show=000000-000015-000006-000024&lang=1
Jensen, Donald N. “How Russia is Ruled – 1998”, 1998 Demokratizatsiya Vol. 7, No. 3
Jurajda, Štěpán. "Gender Segregation and Wage Gap: An East-West Comparison." Journal of
the European Economic Association 3, no. 2/3 (2005): 598-607. Accessed February 1, 2021.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40005002.
Kar, Dev & Brian LeBlanc “Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2002-2011”
2013, Global Financial Integrity, Ford Foundation.
Kara, Siddharth. 2009. Sex Trafficking: Inside the Business of Modern Slavery. New York:
Columbia University Press.
138
Kay, Rebecca. 2006. Men in Contemporary Russia: The Fallen Heroes of Post-soviet
Change? Burlington: Ashgate.
Kayani, Saima A “Human Security and Central Asian States” Policy Perspectives , Vol. 15,
No. 1 (2018), pp. 95-112 Published by: Pluto Journal
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/polipers.15.1.0095
Kimball, Jennifer Human Trafficking, Haiti & the Environment, 2010
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/human-trafficking-the-env_b_427613
Kyiv Post cited Reuters, “In Ukraine, scales of justice often imbalanced,” 2012
https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/in-ukraine-scales-of-justice-often-
imbalanced-125714.html
Kovalova, Elena. "The Expanding Security Agenda: Challenges for Transition States."
Connections 7, no. 1 (2008): 167-77. Accessed October 23, 2020.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323326.
139
Rama Sampath Kumar. "Aral Sea: Environmental Tragedy in Central Asia." Economic and
Political Weekly 37, no. 37 (2002): 3797-802. Accessed November 13, 2020.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412601.
Kuzubov, Dmytro “On the verge of disaster: top 5 environmental problems in Ukraine,”
Euromaidanpress, 2019 http://euromaidanpress.com/2019/11/03/on-the-verge-of-disaster-top-
5-environmental-problems-in-ukraine/
Kutnick, Bruce and Belser, Patrick and Danailova-Trainor, Gergana “Methodologies for
global and national estimation of human trafficking victims: current and future approaches”,
2007, ILO
Kuzio, Taras “Oligarchs wield power in Ukrainian politics,” Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume:
5 Issue: 125, 2008 https://jamestown.org/program/oligarchs-wield-power-in-ukrainian-
politics/
La Strada Ukraine, “Assessment of the risks of internally displaced persons in Ukraine being
trafficked,” 2015 (in Ukrainian) http://old.la-strada.org.ua/ucp_mod_library_view_307.html
Legvold, Robert (2009). “Corruption, the Criminalized State, post-Soviet Transitions”. In
Robert I Rotberg (ed.). “Corruption, global security, and world order”. Brookings
Institutions, p. 197 ISBN 978-0-8157-0329-7
140
London, C.W. “Why is Ukraine’s economy in such a mess?” 2014 The Economist,
https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2014/03/05/why-is-ukraines-economy-in-such-a-
mess
Melnyk, Anna “Trafficking in human beings in Ukraine” DCAF, Migration and Security
Sector Papers, 2014 https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/185732/Melnyk-THB-Ukraine.pdf
Milanovic, Branko (2015). “After the Wall Fell: The Poor Balance Sheet of the Transition to
Capitalism”. Challenge. 58 (2): 135-138 doi:10.1080/05775132.2015.1012402. S2CID
153398717
Ministry of National Economy of Kazakhstan. Committee on Statistics. Women and Men of
Kazakhstan 2012-2016, Astana 2017 https://stat.gov.kz
Molinari, N “Intensifying Insecurities: The impact of climate change on vulnerability to
human trafficking in the Indian Sundarbans”, Anti-Trafficking Review, issue 8, 2017, pp.
50—69, www.antitraffickingreview.org
141
Mossbarger, Danielle “Corruption and Crime in the East: Organized Crime and Human
Trafficking in Russia and Ukraine”, Human Rights and Human Welfare 2007
https://www.du.edu/korbel/hrhw/researchdigest/trafficking/Ukraine.pdf
Molodikova, Irina (2020): One Step Forward and Two Steps Back: Migration Policy and
Human Trafficking in the Russian Federation since the Palermo Protocol of 2020, Journal of
Human Trafficking, DOI: 10.1080/23322705.2020.1690101
McDonald, Lynn; Moore, Brooke; Timoshkina, Natalya. Migrant sex workers from eastern
Europe and the former Soviet Union: the Canadian case, 2000 http://www.swc-
cfc.gc.ca/pubs/pubspr/0662653351/index_e.html
McCarthy, Lauren “Beyond Corruption: An Assessment of Russian Law Enforcement’s Fight
Against Human Trafficking”, 2009 SSRN Electronic Journal 18 (1)
Malarek, Victor. “The Natashas: Inside the New Global Sex Trade”. Arcade, New York, NY
2003.
Mychko, Svitlana “Mykachiv’s syndrome,” Ukrayina moloda 2009 (in Ukrainian)
https://www.umoloda.kiev.ua/number/1369/180/48272/
142
Najibullah, Farangiz & Ukulyay Bestayeva Slow Death In Kazakhstan's Land Of Nuclear
Tests, 2011
https://www.rferl.org/a/soviet_nuclear_testing_semipalatinsk_20th_anniversary/24311518.ht
ml
National Intelligence Council “The Environmental Outlook in Russia”, 1999
https://fas.org/irp/nic/environmental_outlook_russia.html
NEA, “Chernobyl: Assessment of radiological and health impacts 2002” “Update of
Chernobyl: Ten Years On” https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_13598
NED, “Assessing environmental impacts of armed conflict: the case of Eastern Europe,”
2019 https://deis.menr.gov.ua/lib/files/Ecology_crimes_TruthHounds.pdf
Newell, A., and B. Reilly, (2000) "The Gender Pay Gap in the Transition from Communism:
Some Empirical Evidence" William Davidson Institute. Working paper Number 305
Onyshkiv, Yuriy “Clearer picture” Kyiv Post, 2011
https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/clearer-picture-112083.html
143
Oxford Dictionaries, "Definition of Mob in the Oxford Dictionary online, see meaning 2".
Oxforddictionaries.com. The Mafia or a similar criminal organization.
Ott P, Thomas. "Responding to the Threat of International Organized Crime: A Primer on
Programs, Profiles, and Practice Points". United States Attorneys' Bulletin: 2-3
Paringaux, Roland-Pierre “Prostitution takes a turn for the Westâ”, Le Monde, 24 May
1998
Pierre, Jon and B. Guy Peters “Governing complex societies : trajectories and scenarios”,
2005, UK, published by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN
Peer Reviewed Journals “Corruption”. www.longdom.org
Peyrouse, Sebastien “The Kazakh Neopatrimonial regime: Balancing uncertainties among the
“Family,” oligarchs and technocrats” Demokratizatsiya 2016, George Washington University
https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/20_4_115R0286T7381151.pdf
144
Pozhyvanov, Mykhailo “How Ukraine became an economic success leader, 2018”
https://112.international/article/gini-index-how-ukraine-became-leader-in-property-equality-
24415.html
Protection Project “A Human Rights Report on Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women
and Children”, 2008 http://www.protectionproject.org/wp-
content/uploads/2010/09/Russia.pdf
Racioppi, Linda, and Katherine O'Sullivan See. "Organizing Women before and after the
Fall: Women's Politics in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia." Signs 20, no. 4 (1995):
818-50. Accessed February 1, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174884.
Radio Svoboda, “Ukraine conflict taking heavy toll on economy says IMF,” 2016
https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news/2733530
9.html
Radio Free Europe “Ukraine court halts PrivatBank hearing,” 2019
https://www.rferl.org/a/bomb-threat-disrupts-kyiv-court-hearing-into-kolomoyskiy-s-appeal-
of-privatbank-s-nationalization/30221339.html
145
Reuters, “Ukraine advances on anti-corruption practices,” 2011
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe
Reuters, “Ukraine, IMF agree terms to resume financial support,” 2016
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ukraine-crisis-imf-idUKKCN0Y92JB?edition-redirect=uk
Refworld, “Kazakhstan: Situation of Russian minorities; state protection and support
services,” 2016 https://www.refworld.org/docid/50b5f6f02.html
RIA News “Dolgov commented on TIP Report of the US Department of State” 2016
https://ria.ru/20160701/1455987432.html
Rosstad “The dynamics of income 2000-2012”
http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b13_13/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d1/06-05.htm
Russia Profile, “Ten Russian Politicians, Who Make Influence on the Country,” 2018
http://www.russiaprofile.org/ten-russian-politicians-who-make-influence-on-the-country/
146
Suhara, Manabu. "Corruption in Russia: A Historical Perspective" (2004)
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304192618/https://src-
h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/sympo/03september/pdf/M_Suhara.pdf
Small, Ian, and Noah Bunce. "The Aral Sea Disaster and the Disaster of International
Assistance." Journal of International Affairs 56, no. 2 (2003): 58-73. Accessed November 14,
2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24357717.
Smith, Brett “Russia: Environmental Issues, Policies and Clean Technologies,” 2015 AZO
Cleantech https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=542
Sreda Research Group “Arena: Atlas of religions and nationalities” 2012 (in Russian)
https://docviewer.yandex.com/view/0/?page=2&*=rvAv5PGTc%2Fw%2BBFV6QOUZtaf5g
YF7InVybCI6InlhLWRpc2stcHVibGljOi8vMWV1aDl5RDFpcnZKeVZNNSswWWFaZktq
RFhoOXZDNWhldUlGTU5uQU4zQT0iLCJ0aXRsZSI6IlNyZWRhX2Jsb2tfcHJlc3Nfc20yL
nBkZiIsInVpZCI6IjAiLCJub2lmcmFtZSI6ZmFsc2UsInRzIjoxNTI0NDg3NTUzMTcwfQ%3
D%3D
Sutela, Pekka “The Underachiever: Ukraine’s Economy since 1991,” Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace, 2012 https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/03/09/underachiever-
ukraine-s-economy-since-1991#
147
Thompson, “The Aral Sea Crisis” 2008, Columbia University,
http://www.columbia.edu/~tmt2120/introduction.htm
Transparency International, The Global Coalition Against Corruption
https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/kazakhstan
Transparency International, Russia recommends improvements to the implementations of the
UN Convention against Corruption,” 2013
https://www.transparency.org/en/press/transparency-international-russia-recommends-
improvements-to-the-implementa#
The Criminal Code of Ukraine
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/action/popup/id/16257/preview
The Guardian, “Sex, lies and psychological scars: inside Ukraine’s human trafficking crisis,”
2016 https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/feb/04/sex-lies-psychological-
scars-ukraine-human-trafficking-crisis
148
The Moscow Times, “Over 2 million Russians fall below poverty line,” 2015
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2015/12/10/over-2-million-more-russians-fall-below-
poverty-line-a51186
The Moscow Times “21 million Russian live in poverty, officials say” 2019
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/07/30/21m-russians-live-in-poverty-official-data-
says-a66618
The Russian Criminal Code, 1996 http://www.russian-criminal-code.com
The Borgen Project “The Rise of income inequality in Russia,” 2015
https://borgenproject.org/income-inequality-in-russia/
The Borgen Project “5 facts about women’s rights in Russia” 2020
https://borgenproject.org/womens-rights-in-russia/
The World Income Database https://wid.world/country/russian-federation/
149
Tkachuk, Viktor “People First: The latest in the watch on Ukrainian democracy” Kyiv Post,
2012 https://www.kyivpost.com/article/opinion/op-ed/people-first-the-latest-in-the-watch-on-
ukrainian-democracy-5-312797.html
Shield, Stuart “Poverty and Trafficking in Human Beings: A strategy for combating
trafficking in human beings through Swedish international development cooperation”,
Department for Global Development, Svensk Information AB, Edita Västra Aros, 2003,
ISBN 91-7496-322-8 Art. no. UD03.086
Shvedova, Nadezhda. 2009. “Gender Politics in Russia,” in Gender Politics in Post-
Communist Eurasia. Linda Racioppi and Katherine O’Sullivan (eds.). East Lansing:
Michigan State University Press.
Shelley, Luise I “The Organized crime from the FSU: The distinctiveness of Georgia”, 1999,
p. 1-5
Small, Ian, J. Van Der Meer, and R. E. G. Upshur. "Acting on an Environmental Health
Disaster: The Case of the Aral Sea." Environmental Health Perspectives 109, no. 6 (2001):
547-49. Accessed November 14, 2020. doi:10.2307/3455025.
Sulaimanova, Saltanat “Migration trends in Central Asia and the case of trafficking of
women”, Chapter 18, p 377-400, 2006.
150
Snajdr, Edward “Beneath the master narrative: human trafficking, myths of sexual slavery
and ethnographic realities.” Dialect Anthropol 37, 229–256 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-013-9292-3
Slay, Ben - Senior Economist, UNDP Bureau for Europe and CIS “Poverty, Inequality, and
Social Policy Reform in the Former Soviet Union” October 2009
Simai, Mihaly, “Poverty and Inequality in Eastern Europe and the CIS Transition Economies,
DESA Working Paper No. 17, ST/ESA/2006/DWP/17, February 2006
Supreme Court of Kazakhstan “Decisions plenary session of the Supreme Court of
Kazakhstan,” 2012 https://sud.gov.kz/eng/content/2012-1
Traughber, Colleen M. "Terror-Crime Nexus? Terrorism and Arms, Drug, and Human
Trafficking in Georgia." Connections 6, no. 1 (2007): 47-64. Accessed November 17, 2020.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323279.
Tverdova, Y.V. Human Trafficking in Russia and Other Post-Soviet States. Hum Rights Rev
12, 329–344 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0188-1
151
Ukrainska Pravda “FEMEN activists fled from Ukraine,” 2013 (in Ukrainian)
http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2013/08/31/6997008/
Ukrainska Pravda, “What a crime, what a punishment! Or why the “people’s answer” to the
president’s first question will not surprise anyone,” 2020 (in Ukrainian)
https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2020/10/15/7270036/
Vakulchuk, Roman (2014), “Kazakhstan's Emerging Economy: Between State and Market”.
Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. Zugl.: Bremen, Jacobs University, Diss., 2013
ISBN: 9783653987423 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299731455
Vreja, Lucia Ovidia. “Trafficking and Links to Terrorism in South Eastern Europe”.
Connections. Vol 6, No 1, 2007, pp. 27-46
Vlachová, Marie. "Trafficking in Humans: The Slavery of Our Age." Connections 4, no. 4
(2005): 1-16. Accessed October 23, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323192.
Wæhler TA, Dietrichs ES. The vanishing Aral Sea: health consequences of an environmental
disaster. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Oct 2;137(18). Norwegian. doi:
10.4045/tidsskr.17.0597. PMID: 28972331.
152
World Economic Forum, “Global Enabling Trade Report,” 2014
https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-enabling-trade-report-2014
Yablokov, Alexey & Vassily Nesterenko “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for
People and the Environment,” New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences, 2009 https://www.nyas.org/news-and-publications/?filter=Annals
Yan, Wudan “The Surprising link between climate change and human trafficking”, 2018
https://therevelator.org/climate-change-human-trafficking/
Documents of International Organizations.
Council of Europe, Resolution CM/ResCMN(2007)7 on the implementation of the
Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by the Russian Federation
https://web.archive.org/web/20070611061429/http://www.coe.int/t/e/human_rights/minorities
/2._framework_convention_%28monitoring%29/2._monitoring_mechanism/6._resolutions_o
f_the_committee_of_ministers/1._country-
specific_resolutions/2._second_cycle/PDF_2nd_CM_Res_RussianFederation_eng.pdf
153
ECRI, “Conclusions on Ukraine,” 2020 https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-
against-racism-and-intolerance/ukraine
Europol. Trafficking in Human Beings https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas-and-
trends/crime-areas/trafficking-in-human-beings
European Parliament, “Social inequality in Russia,” 2018
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2018/620225/EPRS_ATA(2018)620
225_EN.pdf
IAEA, “Radiological conditions at the Semipalatinsk Test Site, Kazakhstan: preliminary
assessment and recommendations for further study,” 1998 https://www-
pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1063_web.pdf
IMF (2009). The IMF and Good Governance. September 1, 2009. Available at
http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/gov.htm.
IMF, 2021 “Country Data. Kazakhstan” https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/KAZ
IMF, DataMapper https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/
154
IMF, Country Report 2020, “Request for stand-by arrangement-press release; staff report;
and statement by the executive director for Ukraine”
IOM, “Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation: The Case of the Russian Federation”, MRS No. 7
- IOM Migration Research Series, 2002
IOM. “South-Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia” https://rovienna.iom.int
IOM “THE CLIMATE CHANGE–HUMAN TRAFFICKING NEXUS”, 2016
https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/mecc_infosheet_climate_change_nexus.pdf
IOM, “IOM Strategy on Migration, Climate Change and the Environment”
https://environmentalmigration.iom.int/policy/iom-strategy-migration-climate-change-and-
environment
IOM, “ECOLOGICAL MIGRANTS IN BELARUS: Returning Home after Chernobyl?”
1997 https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/return_chernobyl_0.pdf
IOM “Statistics on combating trafficking in human beings in Ukraine,”
2019https://iom.org.ua/en/countering-human-trafficking
155
ILO. “Forced labor, modern slavery and human trafficking”
https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/lang--en/index.htm
OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International
Business Transactions, 1997 http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-
bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf
OECD, DRAFT BACKGROUND NOTE “Promoting Gender Equality in Eurasia. Better
Policies for Women’s Economic Empowerment” February 2019
https://www.oecd.org/eurasia-week/Promoting-Gender-Equality-Eurasia-Feb2019.pdf
OECD Development Center, “From promises to action: Addressing discriminatory social
institutions to accelerate gender equality in G20 countries,” 2019
http://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/OECD_DEV_W20-report_FINAL.pdf
OECD, “Anti-corruption reforms in Kazakhstan. Fourth round of monitoring Istanbul
Convention Action Plan,” (in Russian) 2017 http://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/OECD-
ACN-Kazakhstan-4thRound-Monitoring-Report-RUS.pdf
156
OECD, “Bribery and corruption. Russia”
https://www.oecd.org/russia/bytopic/briberyandcorruption/
OECD, “Phase 2 follow-up: additional written report by Russia,” DAF/WGB(2018)48
https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/WGB(2018)48/en/pdf
OECD, “Anti-Corruption Reforms in UKRAINE. Round 3 Monitoring of the Istanbul Anti-
Corruption Action Plan,” 2015 https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/Ukraine-Round-3-
Monitoring-Report-ENG.pdf
OHCHR, “Ukraine to face review by UN Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination,” 2019
https://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=20348&LangID=
E
OSCE, “Trafficking in human beings: implications for the OSCE. Organization for Security
and Co-operation in Europe”. 2018-2019
OSCE, “Combating trafficking in human beings: Central Asia,” 2015
https://www.osce.org/odihr/177061
157
OSCE, “OSCE and the Russian Federation join efforts to fight human trafficking through
public-private partnerships,” 2017 https://www.osce.org/secretariat/331396
Trafficking in Person Reports 2001 - 2019, U.S. Department of State
https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-trafficking-in-persons-report/
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto
2000, https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/organized-crime/intro/UNTOC.html
UN, “Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident,” DEV/2539-IAEA/1365-SAG/394, 2005
https://www.un.org/press/en/2005/dev2539.doc.htm
UN, “Nuclear testing has ‘disastrous consequences’ for people and planet, General Assembly
told,” 2019 https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/09/1045962
UNDP, “How to overcome poverty in Ukraine,” 2015
https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2015/09/22/how
-to-overcome-poverty-in-ukraine.html
158
UNDP “Can the Aral Sea make a comeback?” 2016 https://undpeurasia.exposure.co/can-the-
aral-sea-make-a-comeback#
UNECE, “ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KAZAKHSTAN” Third
Review, ECE/CEP/185, 2019
https://unece.org/DAM/env/epr/epr_studies/ECE_CEP_185_Eng.pdf
UNECE, “ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS: UKRAINE. Second
Review,” 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24
UNEP, “Ukraine’s Donbas bears the brunt of toxic armed conflict,” 2018
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/ukraines-donbas-bears-brunt-toxic-armed-
conflict
UNODC’s Comprehensive Strategy Combat Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of
Migrants,2012,https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-
trafficking/UNODC_Strategy_on_Human_Trafficking_and_Migrant_Smuggling.pdf
UNODC report on human trafficking exposes modern form of slavery. Country profiles
https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-
trafficking/Country_profiles/Eastern_Europe_Central_Asia.pdf
159
United Nations Convention against Corruption
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/
UN Women Report “Sample survey on violence against women in Kazakhstan”, 2018
https://eca.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/08/sample-survey-on-violence-
against-women-in-kazakhstan
UN Women, Legislation “Defining other forms of forced marriage: bride kidnapping” 2011
https://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/622-defining-other-forms-of-forced-marriage-bride-
kidnapping.html
UN Women “Veronica Fonova: Becoming a feminist and leading Kazakhstan’s first feminist
rally,” 2020 https://eca.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/3/veronica-fonova-becoming-a-
feminist-and-leading-kazakhstans-first-feminist-rally
UN Women: Europe and Central Asia. Ukraine https://eca.unwomen.org/en/where-we-
are/ukraine
160
UN Women “Strategy for Prevention of and Response to Conflict Related Sexual Violence in
Ukraine,” 2018 https://www2.unwomen.org/-
/media/field%20office%20eca/attachments/publications/country/ukraine/crsv%20strategy%2
0en.pdf?la=en&vs=2115
UN, Press-release WOM/977, 1997
https://www.un.org/press/en/1997/19970708.WOM977.html
UN “Migration Profiles. Kazakhstan 1990-2013”
https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/Kazakhstan.pdf
UN, “Report on implementing the principles of sustainable developments in the Russian
Federation. Russian outlook on the new paradigm for sustainable development. Preparing for
“Rio +20,” 2012
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1043natrepeng.pdf
UN, “UN launches new fund to advance sustainable development in the Aral Sea region,”
2018 https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1026701
161
UN, “Combating trafficking in human beings: Ukraine. Report, submitted for the Universal
Periodic Review of the United Nations Organization,” 2017 https://www.upr-
info.org/sites/default/files/document/ukraine/session_28_-
_november_2017/js1_upr28_ukr_e_main.pdf
UN, “Battle against Corruption Vital to 2030 Agenda, General Assembly President Tells
High-level Commemoration of Anti-Corruption Treaty’s Adoption,” 2018
https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/ga12017.doc.htm
UNESCO, Division of Water Sciences, Scientific Advisory Board on Aral Sea Basin
(SABAS) ”Water-related vision for the Aral Sea Basin for the year 2025”, 2000
U.S. Department of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine”
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2008 https://2001-
2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100590.htm
U.S. Department of State, Trafficking in Person Reports 2001 - 2019,
https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-trafficking-in-persons-report/
162
US Department of state, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kazakhstan”
https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/kazakhstan/
US Department of state, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Russia”
https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/russia/
US Department of state, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine
https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/ukraine/
USAID, “Corruption Assessment: Ukraine. Final Report, 2012
https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-
SD962.pdf
WHO, “Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident,” 2005 https://www.who.int/news/item/05-
09-2005-chernobyl-the-true-scale-of-the-accident
WHO, “World Health Organization report explains the health impacts of the world's worst-
ever civil nuclear accident,” 2006
https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2006/pr20/en/
163
World Bank (2009). “Governance Matters” 2009. World Governance Indicators 1996-2008
http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/wgi.pdf
World Bank "Poverty and Inequality Analysis" www.worldbank.org
World Bank (2019) “The World Bank in Kazakhstan. Overview”
https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/kazakhstan/overview#1
World Bank, Growth, poverty, and inequality: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union,
2005 http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/750511468295836867/pdf/34043.pdf
World Bank, Databank “Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines”
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.NAHC?locations=KZ
World Bank, “Ukraine poverty update,” 2007
https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-
reports/documentdetail/316781468110335145/ukraine-poverty-update
World Bank, “In Ukraine, Labor, Taxation, and Social Policies Must Be Upgraded to
Address Rising Inequality, Says World Bank,” 2018
164
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/25/in-ukraine-labor-taxation-and-
social-policies-must-be-upgraded-to-address-rising-inequality
World Bank “Labor force participation rate. Ukraine”
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.ACTI.MA.ZS?locations=UA
World Bank. 2016. Ukraine Country Environmental Analysis. World Bank, Washington, DC.
© World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/24971 License: CC BY
3.0 IGO.”
World Bank, 2017 Diversified Development: Making the Most of Natural Resources in
Eurasia (doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0119-8
https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Feature%20Story/ECA/diversified-
development-eurasia-overview.pdf
Top Related