Download - Table of Cases - Digital Commons @ DU

Transcript

Denver Law Review Denver Law Review

Volume 61 Issue 4 Article 14

January 1984

Table of Cases Table of Cases

Denver Law Journal

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Table of Cases, 61 Denv. L.J. 907 (1984).

This Indexes is brought to you for free and open access by the Denver Law Review at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected].

TABLE OF CASES

A ., In re .......................................................... 60:488A.O. Smith Corp. v. Sims Consolidated Ltd .......................... 61:337A.S. Hom er, Inv. v. NLRB ......................................... 60:323Aaron v. Sec ............................................... 60:380, 381, 382Abeyta v. Town of Taos ........................................... 60:225Abington School District v. Schempp ................................ 61:882Abney v. United States ................................... 60:256, 61:302, 339A Book named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v.

Attorney General of Massachusetts .......................... 60:52, 57-58ACLU v. Jennings ................................................. 60:24Acton v. Blundell ................................................. 61:4A dam s v. State .................................................... 60:491Adam s v. W illiam s ................................................ 61:583-84Addonizio, United States v . ........................................ 60:268Adelman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp ....................... 61:212Adickes v. Kress .................................................. 61:873Aguilar v. Texas ......................... 61:431, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442,

443, 444, 445, 448, 449, 452, 455 459

Ahrens v. Andrus ................................................. 61:363Airlie Foundation, Inc. v. Evening Star Newspaper Co ............... 61:58, 59Alabama v. Kings & Boozer ...................................... 61:803, 804Alabama Power Co. v. Gorsuch ..................................... 60:561Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus .......................... 60:166Aldinger v. H oward ............................................... 61:325Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co ................................. 60:310, 311Alioto v. Cowles Communications, Inc . ............................. 55, 56, 57Alirez v. N RLB ................................................... 60:174Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers .... 60:652Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers ......................... 60:441, 442, 443Alyeska Pipeline v. Wilderness Society ............................... 60:163Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Bergland ................................ 60:275American Bantam Car Co. v. Commissioner ........................ 61:493-494American Mining Congress v. Marshall .............................. 60:174American Trucking Association v. ICC ............................... 61:123Amoco Production Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co .................. 60:340Anderson v. City of Albuquerque ................................... 61:170Anderson v. Department of Housing ................................ 61:122Anderson v. Heron Engineering Co ....................... 60:527, 530, 532Anderson Brothers Ford v. Valencia ................................. 60:216Andrews v. South Dakota Student Loan Assistance Corp ............... 60:212Andrews, United States v . ................. ....................... 60:261Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Commissioner ............................. 61:494-495Anton Piller KG v. Manufacturing Process, Ltd ...................... 61:772Arizona v. California .............................................. 61:69, 73Arizona v. M anypenny ............................................. 61:334Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society .............. 60:178, 593, 602, 605,

608, 609, 611, 61:140, 151, 152Arutonoff v. Oklahoma State Election Board ......................... 61:217Associated General Contractors of California v. California State Council

of Carpenters ................................................. 61:77Associated Grocers of New England v. NLRB ......................... 61:347Associated Press v. W alker ......................................... 61:49, 50

907

908 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp ........... 60:422,423, 430, 431,443

Atencio v. Board of Education ...................................... 60:222Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers v. United States ........................... 60:650Augustin v. Barnes ......................................... 60:434, 435, 444Austin v. City of Denver ........................................... 61:335Aviation Data Service v. FAA ....................................... 61:132Avis v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc . ................................ 60:623Baeth v. H oisveen ................................................. 61:16Baird v. United States ............................................. 60:273Baker v. Carr... ......................................... 60:424, 433Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...... 61:109,

110, 111, 117Barber v. Page ..... ........................................... 60:257, 258Baroid Division of NL Industries Inc. v. OSHRC ..................... 60:328Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc ................. 60:310, 811Barta v. Long ....................... 60:289Barter Systems, Inc., United States v . ............................... 60:580Barton v. M alley .................................................. 60:272Barton Theater Co. v. Commissioner ................................ 61:394Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co . ............................... 61:4-5Bates v. State Bar of Arizona ....................................... 60:109Batterton v. Francis ............................................... 61:113Baum v. Great W estern Cities, Inc . ................................. 61:369Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Carson .................................. 60:67Bear v. Com m issioner ............................................. 60:400Beasley, United States v . .......................................... 60:262Beatrice Foods Compnay v. United States ............................ 61:763Beech v. Commissioner ......................................... 61:482, 483Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, In re ........................... 60:187, 188In re B eery .. .. .................................................. 60:2 14Begley v. M athews ................................................ 60:30Bell v. Burson .................................................... 60:549Bell v. United States ............................................ 61:255, 258Benton v. M aryland ............................................... 60:266Berger, People v . ................................................ 60:55, 56Bergstrom v. Ricketts .............................................. 60:73Berrios, United States v . .......................................... 60:272Beth Israel Hospital and Geriatric Center v. NLRB .................... 60:318Beth Israel Hospital and Geriatric Center v. NLRB (Beth Israel II) ...... 61:349Bigelow v. Virginia ......................................... 60:108, 443, 444Bisceglia, United States v . ................................... 60:577, 579, 592Bishop v. C olow .................................................. 61:37Black Gold v. Rockwool Industries, Inc . ............................. 60:196Blankenship v. H erzfeld ............................................ 60:196Blue Cross Association v. Harris .................................... 60:150Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready ................................ 61:84, 87BMI v. CBS .............................. 60:600, 601, 604, 605, 607, 608, 609Board of Education v. Allen .................................. 61:882, 891-92Board of Education v. Bankers Trust Co ............................. 60:201Board of Regents v. National Collegiate Athletic Association ........... 61:135Board of Regents v. Tomanio .................................... 61:187, 201Broadbent v. H arris ............................................... 61:125Boddie v. Connecticut .......................................... 61:231, 232Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert ............... ......................... 61:337Bokum Resources Corp. v. NLRB ................................... 60:322Bolles v. People ................................................... 60:67

1984] TABLE OF CASES 909

Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax Commission ..................... 60:443Boyd, United States v . ................................. 61:806, 807, 816, 826,

827, 828, 831

Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co ........... 60:525Bratton Corp. v. OSHRC .......................................... 60:153Breen v. Kahl ..................................................... 61:31Brennan v. Butler Lime and Cement Co ............................. 60:328Brewer v. Memphis Publishing Co . ................................. 61:59Brewer, United States v . ................ .......................... 60:262Brigham Young University, United States v .................. 60:586, 587, 588Brignoni-Ponce, United States v .................................... 61:583-84Brinegar v. United States ............................... 61:438, 439, 441, 442Broadcast Music Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System Inc ...... 61:139, 140, 146,

147, 151, 152

Broadrick v. Oklahoma ................................... 60:67, 75, 444Brogan v. Wiggins School District ............................ 61:190, 191, 192Brown v. Bigger .................................................. 61:191Brown v. Board of Education ....................................... 60:283Brown v. Frontier Ford, Inc . ....................................... 60:217Brown v. Illinois ............................................... 61:603, 613Brown v. Railroad Retirement Board ................................ 60:155Brown v. Texas ................................................ 61:584, 587Browning v. Browning .......................................... 61:561, 575Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mart ............................. 61:84Buckley v. Valeo .................... 60:22-25, 30-31, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46Bullington v. M issouri ............................................. 61:301Bullock v. Carter .................................................. 61:220Bumpus v. United States ........................................... 60:346Burks v. United States ............................................. 61:300Burnette v. W ahl ............................................... 61:562, 568,

573, 575Burn s v. Siverson ................................................. 61:29Burroughs v. United States ......................................... 60:22Bus & Transport Securities v. Helvering ........................... 61:480, 482CAB v. Frontier Airlines, Inc . ...................................... 61:133Caban v. Mohammed ............................................. 60:664-65Calandra, United States ............................................ 61:600California v. LaRue .................................. 60:66 , 61:246, 247, 248California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited ................ 60:197California Portland Cement Co. v. Andrus ........................... 60:347In re Callister ............... ....................... ............. 60:213Calvin Klein Company and Centerfold Industries, Inc. v. Filippe Mens

W ear ........................................................ 6 1:792Camara v. Municipal Court ........ ................................ 61:594Campbell v. Commissioner .................................. 61:495-496. 498Cam pbell v. Harris .................... ........................... 60:152Cannon v. University of Chicago .................................... 60:230Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co . ...................................... 60:13Cantwell v. Connecticut ............................................ 60:419Capital Electric Line Builders of Kansas, Inc. v. Marshall ............... 60:154Carey v. Piphus ......................................... 61:184, 866-68, 873Carrizo v. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare ................ 60:155Carroll v. President and Comm's of Princess Anne ................... 61:778Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co . .................................... 61:805Carter v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Plan .... 60:155Cartier, Inc. v. Lotties Jewelry, Inc . ................................. 61:794Catlin v. United States ............................................. 61:317

DENVER LAW JOURNAL

Causey, In re ................................................... 60:503, 504Cavitt v. Schweiker ................................................ 61:125CCI, Inc. v. O SH RC .............. ................................ 61:126Cement Manufacturer's Protective Association v. United States ....... 61:754, 755Central of Georgia Railroad v. OSHRC .............................. 60:153Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission .... 60:109,

111, 112, 113, 116, 61:225, 226, 236, 237, 240, 243, 247Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren Steurer & Associates ............. 60:367CF&I Steel Corp. v. Colorado Air Pollution Control Commission ....... 60:427Chandler v. KEW , Inc . ......................................... 61:369, 370Chapm an v. Schweiker ............................................. 60:152Chavez v. Singer .................................................. 61:338Cheeseman v. Nachman ............................................ 61:733Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway v. Sturm ...................... 61:719Childers v. Independent School District No. 1 ........................ 60:225Childers v. Independent School District No. 1 ........................ 61:192Christy v. Cam bron ............................................... 61:372Churchill Tabernacle v. FCC ....................................... 60:100Cindy R ., In re .................................................... 60:499Circle v. Jim W alter Homes, Inc . ................................... 60:219Cities Service Gas Co. V. Oklahoma Tax Commission ................. 60:276Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe ...................... 60:354Citizens to Protect Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe ....................... 61:124Citizens State Bank, United States v . ............................. 60:590, 591City and County of Denver v. Bergland .............................. 61:364City and County of Denver, United States v .................... 61:67, 71, 72

73, 74, 75City of Aurora v. Erwin ............................................ 61:334City of Detroit v. Murray Corp . ................................... 61:809-811City of Detroit, United States v ....................... 61:809, 810, 812, 823,

827, 830, 831City of Evansville v. Kentucky Liquid Recycling, Inc .................. 60:558City of Newport v. Fact Concerts Inc . ............................... 60:233Civil Service Commission v. Letter Carriers .......................... 61:27Cloverleaf Kennel Club, Inc. v. Colorado Racing Commission .. 60:428, 430, 431,

432, 433Clovis Retail Liquor Dealers Trade Association, United States v ......... 61:277Clulow v. Oklahoma ........................................ 61:193, 195, 290Clyde H., In re .................................................... 60:500Coalition for Fair Utility Rates, Inc. v. Baker ......................... 60:168Coast Coil Co. v. Commissioner .................................... 60:401Coe v. United States District Court .................................. 60:283Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp ..................... 60:256, 61:314Coleman v. MacLennan ............................................ 61:61Colem an, People v . ............................................... 61:455Colem an v. Trupen ............................................... 61:179Colorado High School Activities Association v. National Football League 61:160Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FERC ................................ 60:165Colorado, United States v . ............................. 61:825-828, 829, 831,

833, 834Columbia River Packers Association, Inc. v. Hinton ................. 60:652, 654Columbus Trade Exchange, United States v .......................... 60:587Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton ............................. 61:70, 71Combined Communications Corp. v. Finesilver .................... 60:240, 243Commissioner v. Court Holding Co . ............................. 60:399, 400Com m issioner v. Tufts ............................................. 61:93

[Vol. 60 & 61

1984] TABLE OF CASES 911

61:884-Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist ....... 86,

888-89, 891-92, 894-97Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder ....... 60:190, 191, 192Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission ................ 60:106Constantinides, United States v . .................................... 60:580Continential T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc ................... 60:596, 597, 611Contractors Health & Welfare Plan v. Associated Wrecking Co .......... 60:326Cooley v. Board of W ardens ........................................ 60:633Cooper v. Singer .................................................. 61:184Cooper v. United States ............................................ 61:590Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay ...................................... 60:278Copeland v. M arshall ........................................... 60:562, 563Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner ......................... 60:402Cort v. A sh .................................................... 60:229, 431,

432,433Cortland Speciality Co v. Commissioner ............................. 61:477Cotner v. M ason .................................................. 60:278Couch v. United States .......................................... 60:395, 396C-O-Two Equipment Co. v. United States ......................... 61:760, 764County of Allegheny, United States v . ............................ 61:807-811,

827, 828, 831County of Fresno, United States v ........................... 61:811, 813, 823,

826, 827, 830Crane v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc . ........................... 60:182Crane Sheet Metal, Inc. v. NLRB ................................... 60:319Craig v. Boren ................................................. 60:435, 664

61:245Cram let v. Donahue ............................................... 61:565Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County ............ 60:441, 442Crane v. Commissioner ....................................... 61:95, 96, 97,

99, 102, 106Crisp v. M ayabb .................................................. 60:253Cromar v. Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp ................... 61:81Cronin v.J.B.E. Olson Corp . .................................... 60:524, 525Crosswhite v. Brown ............................................... 61:194Crouch v. United States ............................................ 61:382Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. NLRB ................................... 60:321Crystal Theaters v. W ade .......................................... 60:59Cumberland Public Service Co., United States v .................. 60:399, 500Curley v. United States ............................................ 60:269Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission ..................... 60:155Curtis v. Campbell-Taggart, Inc . ................................... 61:160Curtis, People v . ............................................... 61:678, 679Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts ............................... 61:49, 50, 51, 54Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co .......................... 61:336C .W .M ., In re .................................................. 60:504, 507Dalehite v. United States ........................................... 60:279Dalghish v. Jarvie ................................................. 61:770Danbury Hatters Case ............................................. 60:651Daniels v. G ilbreath ............................................... 60:232Davis v. Passm an ............................................... 60:432, 433Debono v. Vizas .................................................. 60:222D ebs, In re ....................................................... 6 1:776D eibel v. D eibel ................................................... 61:567Delaware v. Prouse ................................................ 61:584Denny v. Hutchinson Sales Corp .................................... 61:192

912 DENVER LAWJOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Byrne ........................... 60:445Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation Union .. 60:330De Vargas v. State ex rel. New Mexico Department of Corrections ... 61:197, 198Devon Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ............... 60:149Dewayne H ., In re ................................................. 60:489D exter, State v . .................................................. 61:20Dileo v. Board of Regents of the University of Colorado ............ 60:429, 445DiFrancesco v. United States .................................. 60:410, 61:301Dilliard v. Brown .................................................. 60:242Dillon, United States v . ........................................... 60:408Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Gurule ......... 60:330Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County ......................... 61:799, 800D oe v. D oe ....................................................... 60:670Dohaish v. Tooley ................................................. 60:231Donaldson v. United States ......................................... 60:388Donovan v. Dewey ............... ................................ 60:249Donovan v. Federal Clearing Die Casting Co ......................... 61:598Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co ............................ 61:604, 613, 614Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc . .......................................... 60:67Dorsey v. English ................................................. 60:668Dorszynski v. United States ......................................... 60:268Draper v. United States ............................ 61:440, 442, 445, 446, 447Drury v. Commissioner ............................................ 60:403Duckworth v. Serrano ............................................. 61:308Dun-Par Engineered Form Co. v. Marshall ........................... 60:152Durham, Commonwealth v . ........................................ 60:497Dye Construction Co. v. OSHRC ................................... 61:123D yer v. C risp ..................................................... 61:304E.H. Koester Bakery Co., United States v . ........................... 60:271Energy Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co ..................... 60:341Environmental Defense Fund v. Corps of Engineers of United States

A rm y ........................................................ 6 1:40Environmental Improvement Division v. Marshall ..................... 60:164Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins ...................................... 60:123Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder ................................. 60:375, 377, 382Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville ................................... 60:68, 107Espinosa v. Rusk ........... .................................. 60:418Estate of Delman v. Commissioner ................................ 61:99, 102Estelle v. Gamble ....................................... 60:232, 61:183, 865,

870-71Estelle v. Sm ith ................................................... 60:253Evans v. C.E. Lumus, Co . ......................................... 60:288Everson v. Board of Education ............................ 61:880-81, 891, 893Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry .................................... 61:777Ex-Cell-O Corp v. City of Chicago .................................. 60:422Fahey v. M allonee ................................................. 61:777Faidley v. H arris .................................................. 60:159Fajen v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co ........................... 61:331Family Record Plan, Inc. v. Commissioner ......................... 60:401, 402In re Fashion Optical, Ltd . ......................................... 60:202FEC v. Florida for Kennedy Committee .......................... 60:25, 28-29FEC v. Phillips Publishing, Inc ...................................... 60:43FEC v. Wisconsin Democrats for Change in 1980 ..................... 60:25Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Brothers ............. 60:81Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill ............................. 61:117Federal Election Commission v. Lance ............................... 60:28Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League 60:17

1984] TABLE OF CASES 913

Federal Power Comm'n v. Oregon (cited in text as the Petton Darr case) . 61:69FPC v. Conway Corp . ............................................. 60:15Fenslage v. Dawkins ............................................... 61:566Finnegan v. Leu .................................................. 61:355First National Bank of Dallas, United States v ....................... 60:581First National Bank of Eden v. Department of the Treasury ...... 60:208, 209, 210Fisher v. United States .......................................... 60:395, 396Flagg, United States v . ............................................ 60:581Flast v. Cohen .................................................... 60:425Florida v. Kerr-McGee Corp ........................................ 60:285Florida v. Royer ................................................ 61:291, 296Francis v. H arris .................................................. 60:152Francis Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Exxon Corp ............................... 60:281Franks v. Delaware ................................................ 61:465Frank Paxton Lumber Co. v. NLRB ................................. 60:312Friedman v. Friedman ............................................. 61:561Frontiers v. Richardson ............................................ 60:664Fuentes v. Sheven ....................................... 60:227, 61:778, 779Gammill v. Commissioner .......................................... 61:393Garcia v. University of Kansas ...................................... 61:194Garden City Production Credit Association v. International Cattle

System ....................................................... 6 1:337Garrick v. City and County of Denver ............................... 60:233Garrison v. Louisiana ............................... 61:44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50,

51, 52, 55, 59, 62Gault, In re ...................................... 60:487, 489, 495, 496, 497,

501, 503, 504, 507, 508; 61:631Geer v. Connecticut ............................................... 60:636General Electric Credit Corp. v. Montgomery Mall Limited Partnership

(In re Montgomery Mall Limited Partnership) ..................... 61:109Gentry v. Califano ................................................. 60:155Gibbons v. O gden ................................................. 60:633G ilbert, R .V . ..................................................... 61:521Gillespie v. Oklahoma ............................................. 61:800Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp . ............................... 61:319Gilmore v. Salt Lake Community Action Program ..................... 61:178Ginsberg v. New York ............................................. 60:71Giordenello v. United States ............................ 61:439, 440, 442, 443G ladys R., In re ................................................. 60:497, 498Glover River Organizations v. Department of Interior ................. 60:361Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar Assn ............ 60:178, 595, 596, 606, 611, 650Goldwasser v. Commissioner ....................................... 61:495Goldwater v. Ginzburg ......................................... 61:54, 55, 60Golub, United States v . ........................................... 60:258Gomez, People v ................................................... 61:586Gomez v. Perez ............................................ 60:662, 666, 668Goodrich v. Burlington Northern Railroad ........................... 61:328Gottlieb, United States v . .......................................... 60:580Government of Virgin Islands v. Smith .............................. 60:271Graham v. John Deere ............................................. 60:369Graham, United States v . .......................................... 60:271Grandbouche v. United States ...................................... 61:233Grau v. United States .................................. 61:438, 439, 440, 442Grayson County State Bank, United States v ........................ 60:591Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Association v. Porester ........... 61:221, 222Green v. United States .......................................... 61:129, 130Greenman v. Yuba Products Co .................................. 60:523, 524

914 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

G reer v. Spock .................................................... 60:107Griffi n v. W irans .................................................. 61:303G rigg v. Finch .................................................... 60:160Griswold v. Connecticut ................................... 60, 72, 462; 61:24Groman v. Commissioner .............................. 61:469, 481, 482, 483,

485, 487, 488, 501Groos National Bank v. Comptroller of the Currency ............... 60:209, 210Guarantee Abstract Title Co. v. United States ........................ 61:379Gulf States Utilities Co. v. FPC ..................................... 60:13G urley v. Rhoden ................................................. 61:812Hackbart v. Holmes ......................................... 60:373, 382, 384Hackenburg v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers ............. 61:354Hackford v. First Security Bank ..................................... 61:369H adley v. Baxendale ............................................... 61:215H ague v. C .I.O . .................................................. 61:862Hamilton v. Hardy .......................................... 60:525, 526, 527Hanover National Bank v. Moyses ............................. 61:717, 736Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp ............... 60:187, 188Hansbury v. Regents of the University of California ............ 61:191, 195, 196H ansen v. H ansen .............................................. 61:567, 574Harding Glass Industries v. NLRB .................................. 60:320Harlow v. Fitzgerald ........................................ 61:864, 871, 875H arold M ., In re ................................................... 60:499Harris v. State ............................................... 60:668Harris v. Illinois-California Express, Inc . ............................ 61:321Harris, United States v . ..................................... 61:446, 447, 451Harvey, People ex rel McKevitt v .................................... 60:52, 53Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co . ........................................ 61:78, 79Hawkins v. Barney's Lessee ......................................... 60:541Hawkins v. Merit System Protection Board ......................... 60:155Haynes v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co . ............................... 60:169H .C ., In re ..................................................... 60:503, 504Hechter v. Department of Health and Human Services ................ 60:155Hedden v. Commissioner .......................................... 61:483Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc ......... 60:106,

111, 114-15Heintz v. Commissioner .................................. ....... 61:496-497Hejira Corp. v. M acFarland ......................................... 61:230Heliczer, United States v . .......................................... 61:674Helvering v. Bashford .............................. 61:481-482, 483, 485, 487Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co . ................ ................ 61:478, 485H elvering v. W atts ................................................ 61:479H enry v. M ississippi ............................................... 60:269H erbert v. Lando ................................................. 61:54H ernandez v. G ray ............................................. 61:170, 171Hernandez v. O'Neal Motors, Inc . .................................. 60:216Herzfeld v. United States District Court .............................. 61:274H icklin, Regina v . ................................................ 60:62H icks v. M iranda ............................................... 61:224, 237Hiigel v. General Motors Corp . ............................. 60:525, 526, 529,

530, 531, 532Hillsborough v. Cramwell .......................................... 60:226Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Association Inc ........ 60:244Hoes of America, Inc. v. Hoes ...................................... 61:843H ollis v. Sm ith .................................................... 6 1:268Holm es, United States v . ............. ............................ 60:591Holter v. M oore and Co . .......................................... 61:158

1984] TABLE OF CASES 915

Home Savings & Loan Association v. Nimmo ......................... 61:117Hopkin Huggett's Case ............................................ 61:664Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co . .............................. 60:279Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital .............. 60:181, 182, 183Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp ...................... 61:251Houston v. Manerbino ............................................. 60:54-55Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter .............................. 60:636Hughes v. Oklahoma ............................................ 60:636, 639Humble Oil & Refining Co., United States v ................ 60:578, 579, 580,

581,582, 592Husky Oil, N.P.R. Operations, Inc. v. NLRB ........................ 60:311H yden v. Baxter .................................................. 60:373Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp . ............................. 60:197Ibrahim , R .V ...................................................... 61:511Illinois v. G ates ........................................... 61:431, 432, 447,

456, 459, 462, 467Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois ............................. 60:187, 188, 189, 190

61:78, 79Indian Twing Co. v. United States .................................. 60:274Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum Institute .......... 60:360Interstate Circut, Inc. v. United States ............................... 61:760Iowa Grain v. Farmers Grain and Feed Co ........................... 60:628Irby, United States v . ........................................... 61:436, 455Irwin v. West End Development Co . ............................. 61:316, 317Island Trade Exchange, Inc., United States v .................... 60:586, 589Jackson v. Lamphire ........................................ 60:542, 543, 545Jackson v. Metropolitian Edison Co . ................................ 60:13Jacobellis v. O hio ................................................. 60:60James v. Dravo Contracting Co . ............................. 61:801-804, 817James v. Ford Motor Credit Co . .................................... 60:216Jam ison v. T exas .................................................. 60:108Janis, United States v . ................................. 61:600, 601, 609, 615Jenkins v. W einshienk ............................................. 60:286Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Andrus .................................... 61:367Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States ............................... 60:365Johannes v. Sloan ................................................. 61:567John A. Nelson Co. v. Helvering ................................. 61:479, 485John Bad Elk v. United States ...................................... 61:664John Doe, In re ................................................... 60:489John Does, In re........................... 60:598Johnson v. Commissioner .......................................... 61:98Johnson, People v . ................................................ 60:349Johnson, United States v . .......................................... 60:272Johnston v. Davis ................................................. 61:366Jones v. H ess ..................................................... 61:307Jones v. H ildebrant ................................................ 61:193Jones v. Sm ith .................................................... 60:670Jones v. United States ....................................... 61:441, 442, 443Jones v. Unknown Agents of the FEC ................................ 60:29Joplin v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co . .......................... 60:288Joseph v. United States Civil Service Commission .................. 61:114, 115Joslin v. United States ............................................. 60:404Kajtazi v. Kajtazi .................................................. 61:564Karen Bags, United States v . ....................................... 61:785Katz v. United States .............................................. 60:468K elly, In re ....................................................... 61:735Kenai Oil and Gas, Inc. v. Department of Interior ..................... 60:353

916 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Kenrose Manufacturing Co. v. Fred Whitaker Co ..................... 61:329Ker v. California ............................................... 61:441, 442Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. Scurlock ............................... 61:804-805, 806,

817, 829, 830Kerr-McGee Corp. v. NRC ......................................... 60:355Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Northern Utilities, Inc .......................... 60:334Key v. Rutherford ................................................. 60:226Kilgroe v. United States ............................................ 60:406King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co .................. 60:195K ing, R .V . ....................................................... 61:535King Radio Corp. v. NLRB ......................................... 60:315Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown ...................................... 60:53Kirkpatrick Oil & Gas Co. v. United States ........................... 60:343Kleen Laundry and Cleaners Inc., United States v .................... 60:272Knight v. Shoshone and Arapahoe Indian Tribes ...................... 60:349Koonce, State v . .................................................. 61:671Kovacs v. Cooper ........................................ 60:108, 111, 116-17Kysor Industrial Corp. v. Frazier .................................... 60:519Laird v. Tatum ................................................... 60:462Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp . ............................... 60:367, 368Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Toledo Blade Co ........................... 60:13-14Lancaster v. Rodriguez ............................................ 61:184Lanner v. W imm er ................................................ 60:236Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc . ...................................... 61:246La Salle National Bank, United States v .................... 60:388, 389, 390,

391,393, 394, 396Lau v. N ichols .................................................... 60:171Lauritzen v. Larsen ................................................ 61:855Law Students Research Council v. Wadmond ......................... 61:27L.B ., In re ........................................................ 60:662Lease Lights, Inc. v. Public Service Co . ............................. 61:157Lee v. People ..................................................... 60:429Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights ................................... 60:107Le Masters v. United States ........................................ 61:257Lemon v. Kurtzman ....................................... 60:237, 61:882-83Leonard, United States v . ......................................... 61:295Le Tulle v. Scofield ............................................... 61:479Lewis v. BT Investment Managers ................................... 60:637Liberty National Bank and Trust Co. v. Commissioner ................. 60:401Linam v. G riffin ................................................... 61:300Lindenau v. Alexander ............................................. 60:241Lindsey v. Dayton Hudson Corp . ................................... 60:284Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro .................. 60:107Littlefield v. Deland ............................................... 61:182Livingston, United States v .......................................... 61:806Lloyd v. Loeffier .................................................. 61:566Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. NLRB ................. 60:210Locken, People v . ................................................ 61:673Lockwood v. Exchange Bank ....................................... 61:718Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co . ....................................... 61:79Long v. Com missioner ............................................. 60:397Longhat v. Andrus ................................................ 60:155Los Angeles Meat and Provision Drivers Union v. United States ........ 60:652Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford .......................... 60:415Loveridge v. Dreagoux .......................................... 60:379, 382Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co . .................................... 61:179, 181Lutz & Schramm v. Commissioner ...................... 61:97, 98, 99, 101, 103

1984] TABLE OF CASES 917

McCranic v. United States .......................................... 61:295M cCray v. Illinois ........................................... 61:450, 461, 466M 'Culloch v. M aryland ............................................... 60:412

61:797-799, 801, 803McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc ........................... 60:369McDonald's of Zion v. Commissioner .................... 61:490-493, 494, 496,

497, 498, 499McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green ....................... 60:234, 61:164, 165,

171, 172, 173McGrady v. Rosenbaum ............................................ 61:561McGuraan v. Veterans Administration ............................... 60:239M cKart v. United States ............................................ 61:130M cKay v. United States ............................................ 61:226M cKee v. H eggy .................................................. 61:173McKeiver v. Pennsylvania ........................................ 60:503, 504M cKinney v. Gannett Co . .......................................... 61:313M cKinney v. H arris ................................................ 60:152McLain v. Real Estate Board ................................. 60:182, 183, 184M cM anus, In re ................................................... 61:739M cNabb v. United States ........................................... 60:259M cShan v. United States ........................................... 60:169M 'Naughten's Case ............................................. 60:492, 493M acKay, United States v . .......................................... 60:393M agnesium Casting Co. v . ......................................... 61:351Mahoning Women's Center v. Hunter ............................... 61:31Mahnke v. Moore ............................................ 61:566Malamud v. Sinclair Oil Corp . ..................................... 61:80, 81M alek-M arzban v. INS .............................. .............. 60:172M allory v. United States ........................................... 60:259M andel v. Bradley .............................................. 61:238, 241M apco Inc. v. Carter ............................... .............. 61:31M app v. O hio .............................................. 61:441, 442, 600Marco Lounge, Inc. v. City of Federal Heights ................ 60:65-68, 70, 445M arcum v. Dahl ................................................... 60:226M arcus v. Search W arrant .......................................... 60:53Marshall v. Barlow's Inc ............................. 60:584, 585, 61:597, 599,

603, 604, 610-12Marshall v. M .W . W atson Inc . ...................................... 60:153Marshall v. Quik-Trip Corp . ....................................... 60:327Marshall v. Regis Educational Corp . ................................ 60:326M artin v. City of Struthers ......................................... 60:108M artin v. H arris ................................................... 60:161Martinez v. Richardson ...................................... 61:129, 130, 131Mashunkashey v. Mashunkashey .................................. 61:556, 574M athews v. Eldridge ............................................ 61:130, 131M atlock, United States v . .......................................... 61:290M attis v. Schnarr .................................................. 61:31M axwell, United States v . .......................................... 60:587M eek v. Pittenger ............................................... 61:890, 892Mendenhall, United States v . .................................... 61:296, 297Mendham Corp. v. Commissioner .............................. 61:98, 99, 101Menefee v. City and County of Denver .............................. 60:73Meredith Corp. v. NLRB ........................................... 61:126Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman ............... 60:628Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe ................................. 60:350, 353Mertsching v. United States ........................................ 61:385Mescalero Apache Tribe v. New Mexico ............................. 60:352

918 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego .................... 60:105, 61:226, 240,M .G .S., In re .. .................................................... 60:504M ichael, In re ..................................................... 60:510M ichael John B., In re .............................................. 60:498M ichigan v. Sum m ers .............................................. 61:288Mid-Continent Coal and Coke Co. v. Federal Mine Safety Commission .. 60:155Midwest Solvents, Inc. v. NLRB ..................................... 61:343Midwestern Transportation, Inc. v. ICC .............................. 61:124Mila v. District Director of Denver .................................. 60:157M ilchein Inc . ..................................................... 60:323Millar v. Commissioner .................................... 61:93, 96, 97, 99,

101, 102, 103Miller v. Board of Education ....................................... 60:283M iller v. California ......................................... 60:50-51, 54-55,

57-64, 68, 74Miller v. City of Mission, Kansas .................................... 61:175Miller v. City of Overland Park ..................................... 61:198Miller v. Leavenworth-Jefferson Electric Cooperative, Inc .............. 60:280M iller, United States v . ......................................... 60:462, 467M ilonas v. W illiam s ............................................... 61:177Mimbres Valley Irrigation v. Salopek ................................ 61:75, 76M indes v. Seam an ................................................. 60:242M iranda v. Arizona ............................................. 61:132, 580M ishkin v. New York .............................................. 60:60Mishler v. St. Anthony's Hosptial Systems ............................ 60:177M ississippi, United States v . ....................................... 61:812Mississippi Power & Light Co., United States v ...................... 60:585Mitchell v. W .T. Grant Co . ...................................... 61:778, 779Mobil Corp., United States v . .................................... 60:582-585M ohammed v. Callaway ............................................ 61:163M onroe v. Pape ............................................ 61:862, 873, 875Montana v. United States ................................... 60:350, 351, 352,

353, 61:813M ontero v. Vizas .................................................. 60:222Montreal Trading Ltd. v. Amax Inc . ................................ 60:195Moore v. City of East Cleveland .................................... 61:28M orris v. H arris ................................................... 60:155M orrison, United States v . ......................................... 61:305M ortensen v. Callaway ............................................. 60:234Morton Salt Co., United States v . .................................. 60:28, 30,

35, 36, 38Mountain States Natural Gas Corp. v. Petroleum Corp. of Texas ....... 61:128Mowrey v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati R.R . ........................... 61:773M/S Bremen and Unterweser Reederei v. Zapata Offshore Co. ... 61:837-50, 859M ueller v. Allen ................................................... 61:877Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co .................. 60:540, 551

61:173Munn v. Munn ................................................ 60:622Murphy v. Society of Real Estate Appraisers .......................... 61:784M yers v. M atley ................................................... 61:712NAACP v. Alabama ex rel Patterson ........................ 60:31, 38, 435, 461Nadem i v. IN S .................................................... 60:172Naranjo v. Ricketts ................................................ 61:309Nathanson v. United States .................................. 61:439, 442, 443National Association of Letter Carriers v. Austin ...................... 61:222National Committee for Impeachment, United States v ................ 60:24National Dairy Products v. United States ............................. 61:764

TABLE OF CASES

National Football League Properties, Inc. v. Coniglio ............... 61:780, 785National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Koch Industries, Inc ............. 60:339National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States ..... 60:598, 606, 607,

611, 61:151National Transportation Services Inc . ............................... 60:308Navajo Tribe v. Bank of New Mexico ................................ 61:211Nebbia v. New York ............................................... 60:544Nevada Power Co. v. W att ......................................... 61:361New England Power Co. v. New Hampshire ....................... 60:637, 639New Horizons Inc., People v ....................................... 60:62, 74New Mexico Association for Retarded Citizens v. New Mexico .......... 60:169New Mexico District Council of Carpenters v. Mayhew Co .............. 60:325New Mexico, United States v . ............................... 61:814-819, 829,

830, 832, 834New York State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca .................. 61:246, 247 248New York Times Co. v. Sullivan .............................. 61:43-48, 53-55,

60-63N ichols, People v . ................................................ 60:509NLRB v. Babcock & W ilcox Co . .................................... 60:311NLRB v. Custom Sheet Metal & Service Co .......................... 60:319NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co . ....................................... 60:314NLRB v. Great Dane Trailers Inc . .................................. 60:313NLRB v. Local 103 International Association of Bridge Workers ........ 60:326NLRB v. Tam iment Inc . ........................................... 60:311NLRB v. W .C. McQuaide, Inc . ..... ............................... 61:345NLRB v. Slagle Manufacturing Co . ................................. 60:322North American Furniture and Appliance, Inc., People v ............... 60:645Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Oil Co ............ 61:209, 210Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota ...................... 60:298-299, 304N RD C v. T rain ................................................... 60:556NRLB v. American Can Co . ....................................... 60:313NRLB v. Carbonex Coal Co . ....................................... 60:315NRLB v. W ilhow Corp . ........................................... 60:314Nunez v. Bergland .................................. ............. 60:164Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. EEOC .............................. 60:231O hio v. Roberts ................................................ 60:251, 258Ohio Bell Telephone Co., United States v ......................... 60:582, 583O hlendorf v. Bennett .............................................. 60:617Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association ............................... 60:109Oklahoma v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission .................. 60:243Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling ........................... 60:29Oklahoma Steel Casting Co. v. Banks .............................. 60:299Oklahoma Telecasters Association v. Crisp:

Capitol Cities Cable Inc. v. Crisp ............................. 61:224, 235O'Leary v. Moyer's Landfill, Inc .................................. 60:557, 558O lm sted v. United States ........................................... 60:450Olson Farms, Inc. v. Countryside Farms, Inc ........................ 60:193Oringderff v. Commissioner ........................................ 60:402O 'Sullivan v. Felix ................................................. 61:187Otasco, Inc. v. United States (In re South) ............................ 61:231Otero Savings & Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board ... 60:204Otter Tail Power Co v. United States ................................ 60:13Overnight Motor Co. v. Missel ...................................... 60:327Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger ........................ 61:323, 324O wens v. Rush ................................................. 60:224, 235Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation &

Development Commission ................................... 60:229, 304

1984] 919

920 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Paluso v. Mathews ............................................ 60:330Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ............................. 61:800, 801, 803Parker v. Delaney ................................................. 61:96, 97Parratt v. Taylor ............................................. 60:224, 61:174Parrish, In re ...................................................... 61:734Peabody Galion v. Dollar ........................................... 60:308Peltier, United States v . ........................................... 61:615Pennick v. Florala ................................................. 61:188Pennsylvania v. Whelling & Belmont Bridge Co. (II) .................. 60:637Perez v. Cam pbell ................................................. 61:735Perry v. Parker .................................................... 61:773Personnel Administrator v. Feeney .................................. 60:242Peters v. New York ............................................... 61:582-83Peterson, State v . ................................................. 60:509Peterson, United States v . ......................................... 60:261Pevely Dairy Co. v. United States ........................ 61:749, 750, 751, 752,

753, 754, 755, 757, 759,760, 761, 762, 763, 764

Phelps v. Kansas Supreme Court ................................. 60:223, 224Pickering v. Board of Educat;on ..................................... 60:226Pickle v. Page ..................................................... 61:564Pierce v. City and County of Denver ................................. 60:73Pierson v. Ray .................................................... 61:864Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc . .............................. 60:634-35, 636, 637,

638, 639, 642Pilcher v. Commissioner ........................................... 60:404Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co v. Commissioner ............... 61:447, 478, 479Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. NLRB .................................. 61:353Pittsburg Trade Exchange, Inc., United States v .............. 60:586, 587, 589Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. DanForth ......................... 61:27Plante v. Gonzalez ................................................ 61:31Poolaw v. City of Anadarko ......................................... 60:221Porth v. Templar ............................................ 60:409, 61:278Powell, United States v . ................................... 60:388, 389, 575,

583, 588, 589Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center v. NLRB ...................... 60:316Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center v. NLRB ...................... 61:350Pring v. Penthous International, Ltd . ............................... 61:221Procunier v. Navarette ................................... 61:870-71, 873, 875Przybla v. Przybla ............................................... 61:567, 572Pueblo Aircraft Service, Inc. v. City of Pueblo ........................ 60:190Pure O il Co . ..................................................... 60:338Pushkin v. Regents of University of Colorado ......................... 60:229Pymatuning W ater Shed ........................................... 60:559Q-T Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc .............. 60:646-48, 653-54,

656-57Quandelacy v. Wayne Lovelady's Frontier Ford, Inc .................. 60:217Q ueen v. Tooley .................................................. 61:664Queensgate Investment Co v. Liquor Control Commission ..... 61:224, 225, 237,

238, 239, 240, 241, 242,243, 244, 247, 252

Q uintana v. Harris ................................................ 60:282Q uintero, People v ............................ ................... 61:591R.W. Harmon & Sons, Inc. v. HLRB ................................ 60:307Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co . ............................... 60:276Ray v. City of Edmond ............................................. 60:233Reader's Digest Association v. FEC .............................. 60:4041, 43

1984] TABLE OF CASES 921

Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance ............................. 60:59-60, 64, 69Redm ond v. Tuttle ................................................ 61:205Reed v. Reed ............................................... 60:664, 61:735Reid v. G eorgia ................................................... 61:299Reilly v. Leonard .................................................. 61:36Reism an v. Caplin ................................................. 60:588Rendell-Bakerr Kohn ............................................ 61:178, 179Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union v. NLRB .............. 61:364R .G .W ., In re ..................................................... 60:503Rhode Island Federation of Teachers v. Norberg ............... 61:877, 886, 895Rice v. Connolly .................................................. 61:518Richardson v. Perales .............................................. 61:126Rinsley v. Brandt .................................................. 61:223Riverside Irrigation District v. Stipo ................................. 60:363R.M cG. v. JW ............................................... 60:664 -65, 673Robberson Steel Co. v. OSHRC .............................. 61:604, 607, 610Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Association v. Watt ..................... 61:359Rodgers v. Rodgers ............................................... 61:567Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson .................................. 60:245Rodziewicz v. W idener ............................................. 60:224Roe v. W ade ....................................... 60:659-60, 667, 670, 671

61:27, 28Rom ero v. H arris ................................................. 60:155Rose v. Lundy .................................................... 61:307Rosebud Coal Sales Co., Inc. v. Andrus .............................. 60:347Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc . ................................... 61:53Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank ................................... 60:276Roth v. United States .............................................. 60:62R udd, R . v . ...................................................... 6 1:511Ruffalo, In re ..................................................... 60:224Rugendorf v. United States ......................................... 61:442Runnels v. H ess ................................................... 60:268Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb ................................. 60:326St. Amant v. Thompson ................................ 61:44, 45, 51, 52, 53,

55, 57, 58, 59St. Anthony Hospital Systems v. NLRB .............................. 60:318St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad

Signalm en .................................................... 60:329Sacco v. United States Parole Commission ........................... 60:166Sadegh-Nobari v. INS ............................................. 60:168Sam pley v. Ruettgers .............................................. 61:183San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Arizona ................................. 61:71San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmar ........................ 60:309Sanders, In re ..................................................... 60:488Sanitary Milk Producers v. Bergjans Farm Dairy, Inc ............... 61:763, 764Santosky v. Kram er ................................................ 61:633Savina Home Industries v. Secretary of Labor .................. 61:603, 604, 610Schaal v. Rowe ......... ......................................... 61:870Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephriam ...................... 60:108, 111, 116-17Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co . ................................ 61:842, 847, 853Schneider v. Arizona .............................................. 60:108Schweiker v. Hansen .............................................. 61:118Schwinn, United States v . .......................................... 60:597Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey ..................................... 61:336SEC v. Haswell .............................................. 60:381SEC v. Mick Stack Associates ....................................... 60:381Secretary of Labor v. Sarasota Concrete Co ................. 61:605, 606, 613

922 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Selman v. Chaval Upholstery Supply Co . ............................ 60:327Seven Thirty-five East Colfax, Inc., United States v ................... 60:71SFI, Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Co ..................... 60:280Shah v. H alliburton Co . ........................................... 61:191In re Shannon ..................................................... 60:211Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei ........................... 60:246Sheet Metal Workers International Association v. Seay ................. 61:330Sherwood B. Brunton ............................................. 60:79Sibron v. New York .......................................... 61:582-83, 588Sierra Club v. Gorsuch ...................................... 60:560, 561, 563Sierra Club v. M orton ............................................. 60:555Sierra Club v. W att ................................................ 61:71Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp . ............................... 60:291, 61:416Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization ............... 60:429Skidm ore v. Swift & Co . ........................................... 61:113Skip v. H arwood ............................................... 61:770, 795Slaughterhouse Cases .............................................. 61:862Sloan v. Lem on ............................................. 61:884-86, 892Sm ith v. Illinois ................................................ 61:449, 450Sm ith v. Iron County .............................................. 61:182Sm ith v. Paulk .................................................... 61:232Sm ith, United States v . ............................................ 60:409Sm ith v. U nited States ............................................. 60:64Sm ith v. W ade .................................................... 61:861Smith Machinery, Co., Inc. v. Jenkins ................................ 60:217Snyder v. United States ............................................ 60:405Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., United States v ..................... 60:596, 61:154Sorenson v. National Transportation Safety Board .................... 61:131Southeastern Community College v. Davis ........................... 60:171S. P. B., In re ................................................ 60:659Specht v. Patterson ................................ 61:263, 264, 266, 267, 268Spector M otor Serv., Inc. v. W alsh .................................. 61:40Spiegel v. School District No. 1 ......................... 61:191, 195, 196, 201Spinelli v. United States .................................... 61:431, 437, 444,

445, 446, 447, 448Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas ................................ 60:631Stanback v. Stanback .............................................. 61:566Stanley v. G eorgia ................................................. 60:69Stanley v. Illinois .................................... 60:548, 663, 665, 61:28State Land Board v. State Department of Fish & Game ............. 60:346, 347Steel v. Gebelberger In re Fashion Optical Ltd.) ....................... 61:213Stewart Capital Corp. v. Andrus .................................... 61:364Stone v. People .................................................. 61:584-87Storer Broadcasting Co., United States v . .......................... 60:89, 104Strey v. Hunt International Resources ............................... 61:336Sullivan, In re .................................................... 61:735Superior Court, People v . ......................................... 60:507Superior Oil Co. v. Western Slope Gas Co ........................... 60:340Sutton v. United States ............................................ 60:271Sweeten v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service ..... 61:357Sw ift v. T yson .................................................... 60:123Swift Agricultural Chemicals Corp. v. Farmland Industries, Inc .......... 60:367Tabron, People v ................................. 60:50, 55, 57-62, 65, 68, 74Tabron (II), People v . ............................................ 60:61, 73Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Commissioner ....................... 60:396Tate, People v . ................................................... 61:587Tattered Cover, Inc. v. Tooley ..................................... 60:71, 75

1984] TABLE OF CASES 923

Terry v. Ohio ......................................... 61:287, 289, 581-585,587, 589-590, 592-594

Texaco, Inc. v. Short .............................................. 60:537Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc ................... 60:193, 194Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp .......... 61:760Thermtron Products, Inc., v. Hermansdorfer ......................... 61:330T hom as, People v .................................................. 61:579T hom as, State v . ................................................. 61:671Thompson v. Kerr-McGee Refining Co ........................... 60:284, 298Thullen v. Triumph Electric Co . ................................... 61:775Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Secretary of Labor ...................... 61:606, 609Tompkins v. Frey (In re Bel Air Association, Ltd.) ..................... 61:207Tony C., In re ..................................................... 60:498Topco Association, Inc., United States v ........................ 61:150, 151Township of Muskegon, United States v ............ 61:809, 810, 827, 828, 831Trans-Missouri Freight Association, United States v .................. 60:596Treschman v. Treschman .......................................... 61:569T .R .S., In re ...................................................... 60:510True O il Co. v. FERC ............................................. 60:344True Temper Corp. v. CF&I Steel Corp .............................. 60:370Trustees of Teamsters Construction Workers Local No. 13 v. Hawg N

Action, Inc ............................... 60:324Trujillo, State ex rel State Highway Commission v .................... 60:346T sosie v. Califano ................................................. 60:151Turley, United States v . ........................................ 61:256, 257Turner Brothers Trucking Co. v. ICC ............................... 61:124UAW v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp . .............................. 60:325, 61:190Union Supply Co. v. Pust .......................................... 60:526United Food Workers International v. Gold Star Sausage Co ............ 60:324United Mine W orkers v. Gibbs ...................................... 61:325United States v. Am on ............................................. 60:272United States v. Baez .............................................. 61:310United States v. Boss .......................................... 60:263United States v. Brigham Young University ........................... 61:389United States v. Brown ............................................ 60:263United States v. Cronic ............................................ 60:258United States v. Crouthers ......................................... 60:262United States v. Cuaron ............................. .............. 61:282U nited States v. Drake ............................................. 60:251United States v. Erickson ........................................... 60:407United States v. Freem an .......................................... 61:274United States v. Golub (Golub I) .................................... 61:303United States v. Golub (Golub II) ................................... 61:303United States v. Guerrero .......................................... 60:260United States v. H art .............................................. 60:249United States v. H ines ............................................. 61:302United States v. Hunter ............................................ 60:270United States v. Jones ............................................. 61:385U nited States v. King .............................................. 60:258United States v. Lawson ........................................... 60:408United States v. Leonard ........................................... 61:295United States v. MacDonald ........................................ 60:250United States v. M adrid ............................................ 60:252United States v. M artinez .......................................... 60:255United States v. M assey ............................................ 61:282United States v. M cDonald ......................................... 61:296United States v. M erritt ............................................ 61:288

924 DENVER LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

United States v. M iller ............................................. 60:347United States v. M ontoya .......................................... 60:265United States v. New M exico ....................................... 60:411United States v. O 'Brien ........................................... 61:269United States v. Osterlund ......................................... 60:349United States v. Poulos ............................................ 60:264United States v. Prescon Corp . ..................................... 61:276United States v. Pride ............................................. 61:272United States v. Puckett ............................................ 61:302United States v. Radeker ........................................... 60:261United States v. Rom ero ........................................... 61:291United States v. Rothbart .......................................... 60:257United States v. Rucinski ........................................... 60:249United States v. Schell ............................................. 61:260United States v. Scholbe .............................. ............ 60:392United States v. Security Bank and Trust Co ......................... 60:389United States v. Security Industrial Bank ............................. 60:414United States v. Seward ............................................ 61:270United States v. Shoels ............................................ 61:255United States v. Silvestain .......................................... 60:394United States v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co ..................... 61:391United States v. Thompson ......................................... 61:109United States v. Torres ............................................ 60:259United States v. Verdin ............................................ 61:303United States v. W ard ............................................. 61:286United States v. W hite ............................................. 60:269United States ex rel. Federal Corp. v. Commercial Mechanical

C ontractors ....................... ........................... 61:213United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty ........................ 60:282University of Oklahoma Gay People's Union v. Board of Regents ....... 60:277Utah v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ...................... 61:126Valentine v. Chrestensen ........................................... 60:108Valenzuela v. Griffin ............................................... 60:257Vance v. Vance ................................................. 61:567, 575Vane v. Lord Barnard ............................................. 61:770Varnish v. Best Medium Publishing Co . ............................. 61:57Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense

C ouncil, Inc . .................................................. 60:109,110, 111, 117, 174

Verniero v. Air Force Academy School District 20 ..................... 61:167Vickers v. H am pton ............................................... 60:155Vigil v. Andrus ................................................... 60:173Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc . ................................... 61:333Vinyard v. King ............................... ................... 60:277Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council .. 60:106,

109, 113, 115Vlandis v. Kline ....................................... 60:549, 550, 669, 672Vuitton et. Fils, S.A ............................... 61:784, 788, 790, 791Wabash, St. Louis, & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois ................... 60:633-34W ade v. H aynes .................................................. 61:870W ainwright v. Sykes ............................................... 60:268W aits, People v . ............................................ 61:587-88, 590Walker v. Colorado Springs Sun, Inc . ............................... 61:64W alling v. Portland Terminal Co . .................................. 60:326Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp . ............................ 60:343W alz v. Tax Commission ........................................... 61:882W am sley v. People ................................................ 60:662

1984] TABLE OF CASES 925

W ard v. Illinois ................................................... 60:60W ard v. United States ....................... ................... 61:286, 380W arwickshall, R. v . ............................................... 61:511W ashington v. United States ................................. 61:814, 819-825,

829, 830, 831,834W asserman v. W asserman .......................................... 61:564W atts v. H adden .................................................. 60:266W eeks, People v . ............................................. 60:64, 66, 67W eeks v. United States ............................................ 61:600W eicker v. W eicker ............................................. 61:561, 574W einberger v. Salfi ............................................. 60:549, 550W einstein v. Bradford ........................................... 60:166, 243Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company ......... 61:763W esley Medical Center v. Schweiker ................................. 60:163Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Citizens Bank of Las Cruces ......... 60:199W estern Nuclear, Inc. v. Andrus .................................... 60:344W eston v. Charleston .............................................. 61:799W halen v. Roe ........................................... 60:462, 463, 61:28Wheeler Machinery Co, v. Mountain States Mineral Enterprises, Inc ..... 61:336W heeler, United States v . ......................................... 60:351W hite v. Stum p ................................................... 61:712White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe v. Shelley ...................... 61:211Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission ........... 61:327W iener v. W iener .............................................. 61:561, 574W ilkett v. United States ............................................ 60:254William Anderson Corp., United States v .......................... 61:279, 280W illiams, United States v . .................................. 61:294, 602, 603,

604, 606, 607, 609, 610, 613, 614W illiam s v. Carlson ................................................ 60:169W illiam s v. M orris ................................................. 61:174W illiams v. New York ........................................... 61:266, 267W illiam s v. Rhodes ................................. ........... 61:219, 220W illiamson v. United States ........................................ 61:436Wilson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Co . .............................. 60:633Wilson v. Department of Health and Human Services ................. 60:155W ilson v. H inm an .............................................. 61:194, 198W ilwording v. Swenson ............................................ 61:308W imberly v. Ettenberg ..................................... 60:421, 422, 423,

425, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431,433, 439, 440W inburn, In re ................................................. 60:502, 503W inship, In re .............................................. 60:503, 508, 513W inters v. United States ........................................... 61:68, 69W isconsin v. Constantineau ........................................ 61:245W ise v. Bravo ..................................................... 60:228W olf v. United States .............................................. 60:155W olfs v. Britton ................................................... 60:258W olm an v. W alter ................................................. 61:890W ood v. Strickland ......................................... 61:864, 873, 875Woodsam Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner .......................... 61:98, 99Woodworth v. Stanley Vacation Club, Inc ....................... 60:286, 287W ren v. H arris .................................................... 60:175W right Line ...................................................... 60:315Ybarra v. Illinois .................................................. 61:287Yoder v. H arris ................................................... 60:159Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc . ............................. 60:107Yuengling v. Johnson .............................................. 61:774Zimmerman v. Brunson ......................................... 60:345, 346

926 DENVER LAWJOURNAL [Vol. 60 & 61

Zinser v. Continental Grain Co . .................................... 60:185Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc . ............................................ 61:369Zorach v. Clauson ................................................. 60:237Zuniga v. Amfac Foods, Inc ...................... 61:190, 191, 194, 195, 203