MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
1
Shear strength of concrete beams reinforced with steel bars milled from scrap metals
Charles K. Kankam, Mark Adom-Asamoah
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology,
School of Engineering, Kumasi, Ghana
Abstract The paper reports a study on the shear resistance of concrete beams reinforced with mild steel
bars that are milled from scrap metal such as old vehicle parts and obsolete machinery. It has
been previously reported that because the chemical compositions of carbon, sulphur and
phosphorus in these reinforcing steel bars exceed the maximum allowable limits, the
characteristic tensile strengths are too high and ductility too low for standard mild steel.
Concrete beams reinforced with such bars to resist flexural tensile and shear stresses were tested
under a two-point loading system to provide a central constant moment region and outer shear
spans. Tested beams exhibited little deflection and very low ductility prior to collapse.
Experimental failure loads for the beams aver-aged 123% of the theoretical failure load, which
was generally governed by either shear or yielding of the tension steel. Shear failure was mostly
initiated by diagonal tension cracks, followed by either crushing of the concrete, or splitting of
the concrete over the longitudinal tensile bars near the supports. Failure of the beams was brittle
and the post-cracking strain energy absorption averaged 357.9 Nm. At failure the maximum
crack width in the beams ranged from 1.12 to 5.0 mm, the largest sizes forming in the diagonal
shear cracks.
Keywords: Shear strength; Steel bars; Concrete; Ductility; Crack; Deflection
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
2
1. Introduction
Reinforced concrete, one of the most widely used construction materials in modern times, is a
composite material of steel bars that are embedded in a hardened concrete matrix. Concrete has a
high compressive strength, but is very weak in tension with a tensile strength being of the order
of 10% of the compressive strength. Rein-forcing steel bars to enhance the load-carrying
capacity of the structure must resist the tensile stresses that develop in a structural concrete
member due to flexural, axial or shear forces. Reinforcing steel bars for concrete construction are
generally of two types, namely, mild steel of nominal strength 250 N/mm2, and high-yield steel
from 425 to 460 N/mm2. Standard low carbon mild steel exhibits relatively large ductile
deformations compared with high-yield steel. However, it has been found in an earlier study that
mild steel bars milled from metal scraps in Ghana generally have a tensile strength far above the
standard 250 N/mm2 and very low ductility because of their high carbon, sulphur and
phosphorus contents [1].
Such high strength, low ductility mild steel is undesirable in reinforced concrete structures
because it defeats the philosophy of under-reinforced design as no warning of any impending
failure of the structure will be given by way of excessive deflections and cracks. However, the
bond strength of these bars that are generally milled with surface lugs is high and of the same
order as that of high-yield ribbed bars, but much greater than for normal mild steel bar [2].The
present study investigated the shear capacity of concrete beams reinforced with steel bars that
were milled from scrap metals. Shear stresses accompany a change in the bending moment in
beams and give rise to diagonal tension in concrete and also bond stresses between the
reinforcing bars and the concrete. Shear stresses in reinforced concrete beams without adequate
shear reinforcement produce cracks at inclined planes near the support and may cause collapse of
the beams.
2. Shear resistance of reinforced concrete beam
The mechanism of shear transfer in a cracked concrete beam acted on by a shear force V is
illustrated in a free-body diagram of Fig. 1. An element in the beam will be subjected to shear
stresses and to horizontal nor-mal stresses due to bending as shown in Fig. 2. Near the neutral
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
3
axis of the flexural cracked region where the bending stresses are comparatively small, the
element may be neglected without serious loss of accuracy. The shear stresses then are
equivalent to the principal stresses which are traditionally called diagonal tension. Prior to
diagonal cracking the external shear force V produces practically no stress in the shear/web
reinforcement. When the diagonal crack forms any web bar that intercepts the diagonal crack
suddenly carries a portion of the shear force V. Web bars that do not intercept any cracks remain
essentially unstressed.
An equilibrium equation for shear in a cracked beam may be expressed as
(1)
Where Va is the shear resistance of the aggregate inter-lock across the diagonal crack; Vcz is the
shear carried by the uncracked concrete in compression; Vd is the shear carried by the dowel
action of the longitudinal reinforcement; Vs represents the shear force carried by the web bars
crossed by the diagonal crack (Fig. 1). As the external shear V is increased in a typical beam the
web steel yields so that Vs remains constant at the yield value and subsequent increase in the
shear force V must be carried by Va, Vcz and Vd. As the diagonal crack widens Va becomes less
effective since aggregate interlock reduces. Vcz and Vd have to take up the extra load and they
therefore increase rapidly [5]. Failure of the beam therefore occurs in one of two ways:
1. Dowel splitting of the concrete along the longitudinal reinforcement, or
2. Crushing of the concrete in the compression zone resulting from the combined shear and
direct stresses.
In providing shear resistance by allowing re-distribution of external forces across any inclined
crack that may form, the shear reinforcement has the following primary functions:
1. Carry part of the shear;
2. Resist growth of the inclined crack and thus help maintain interlock (that is, interface
shear transfer);
3. Tie longitudinal bars in place and thereby increase their dowel capacity.
In addition to the above primary functions dowel action on the stirrups may transfer a small force
across a crack and the confining action of the stirrups on the compression concrete may slightly
increase its strength. Little shear reinforcement may cause it to yield immediately at the
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
4
formation of the inclined crack and the beam fails. Excessive shear reinforcement on the other
hand leads to shear compression failure before yielding of the web steel. The optimum amount of
shear reinforcement is such that both the shear reinforcement and the shear compression zone
continue to carry increasing shear after the formation of the inclined crack until yielding of the
shear reinforcement, thus ensuring ductile failure.
The following assumptions are made in the design of reinforcement for diagonal tension [3]:
1. diagonal tension is equal to shear at section;
2. diagonal tension crack is inclined at 45L to the longitudinal axis of the member;
3. crack extends over maximum horizontal distance equal to the effective depth of the beam;
4. normal tension is zero.
Fig.1.Shear transter in beam with web reinforcement
Fig.2. An element in one-half reinforced concrete beam
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
5
3. Experimental programme
3.1. Materials and specimens
Samples of steel bars were obtained from three steel manufacturing companies in Ghana,
namely, Tema Steel Works, Wahome and Ferro Fabric for the experimental study. The chemical
and physical properties of the steel have previously been reported [1]. Concrete beams were
reinforced with different percentages of shear and tension reinforcements from the different
millers to investigate the shear capacity of these bars in concrete. The concrete consisted of
ordinary Portland cement, natural river sand and crushed granitic rock of 12 mm maximum size
in different proportions and different water–cement ratios. The shear reinforcement was formed
from 6 mm vertical steel stirrups along the entire length of the beam while the main tension
reinforcement consisted of 12 mm bars. The concrete for the beams and control cubes was
mechanically mixed in a paddle mixer, placed and compacted by means of a shutter vibrator.
They were cured at 100% relative humidity and approximately 25 LC room temperature for 28
days. The details of the beams are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Description of beams
Beam
no. B x D Span/eff shear span/eff Percentage of steel Concrete strength
Steel
strength
depth
ratio depth ratio Tension Compression fcu (N/mm2) fy (N/mm2)
B1 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 26.42 390
B2 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 20.83 390
B3 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 28.45 340
B4 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 26.17 340
B5 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 26.4 490
B6 140 x 230 6.9 1.72 1.19 0.20 20.28 490
B7 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 26.42 390
B8 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 26.17 390
B9 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 20.83 340
B10 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 20.28 340
B11 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 20.28 340
B12 100 x 230 8.7 2.31 1.78 0.30 28.45 490
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
6
3.2. Test procedure
The beams were simply supported at their ends on steel beams that formed part of a rigid steel
frame. A two-point symmetrical loading was applied through a spreader beam that formed part
of the loading system to produce a constant moment in the central span of the beams. Deflections
at mid-span were measured using a dial gauge reading to 0.01 mm mounted beneath the beam.
Crack width was measured on the concrete surface using a crack microscope reading to 0.02
mm. Load was applied in increments, and at each load increment all required measurements were
taken.
4. Flexural theory
For a simply supported beam that is subjected to a two-point symmetrical loading system with a
constant moment in the central region, the ultimate flexural load Pult is given by
(2)
where Mult denotes the ultimate moment of resistance; x is load per unit length due to self-weight
of the beam; L is span of beam; z is distance from point load to nearest support.
5. Shear strength
In accordance with the British Standard BS 8110: 1985 method of design [4], the theoretical
shear strength of the beam was calculated by considering the concrete section, the tension steel
reinforcement and the steel stirrups.
6. Theoretical and experimental results
6.1. Material properties of beams
Details of the concrete and reinforcing steel bars used in the investigation are given in Table 1.
The tensile strength of the steel was obtained from tensile tests per-formed on samples of the
steel that were obtained from the three manufacturers in Ghana [1].
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
7
6.2. Behaviour of beams
The cracking, theoretical and experimental failure loads of the 18 beams are presented in Table
2. The theoretical failure load was calculated by considering: (i) yielding of the steel in tension;
(ii) crushing of the concrete in compression; (iii) shear failure. Figs. 3–5 show typical load–
deflection curves for three beams that were continuously loaded to failure. The post-cracking
strain energies of the beams are presented in Table 4.
Table 2 : First crack and failure load
Beam
no.
First
crack Experimental
Theoretical failure load Pult0
(KN) Pcr Pult
load failure load steel Concrete Shear Pult P'ult
Pcr(KN) Pult(KN) yieding crushing failure
B1 16 106.0 105.1 144.7 95a 1.12 0.15
B2 16 102.0 99.6 116.0 94.4a 1.08 0.16
B3 32 149.1 99.3 153.8 92.6a 1.61 0.21
B4 16 102.0 97.8 142.1 91.1a 1.12 0.16
B5 12 102.0 130.7 147.3 111.4a 0.92 0.12
B6 24 94.8 129.1 115.8 110.3a 0.86 0.25
B7 6 64.8 70.9a 74.2 83.4 0.91 0.09
B8 16 70.6 70.7 73.6 56a 1.26 0.23
B9 16 88.3 61.6 58.9 78.4 1.5 0.18
B10 10 62.8 61.0 57.5 53a 1.18 0.16
B11 8 90.3 87.2 81.3 69.6a 1.3 0.2
B12 18 66.7 84.3 76.1 63.9a 1.04 0.27
B13 10 48.0 32.4a 41.4 182.8 1.48 0.21
B14 6 46.0 31.7a 39.4 182 1.45 0.13
B15 7 42.0 33.3a 44.0 184 1.26 0.17
B16 6 42.0 33.3a 38.6 181.6 1.34 0.14
B17 4 43.0 32.8a 42.4 183.2 1.31 0.09
B18 6 42.5 31.1a 38.0 181.6 1.37 0.14
7. Discussion of test results
The load–deflection curves show a linear relationship prior to cracking, and a nonlinear response
after cracking of the beams. The relatively short range of deflections of the beams prior to failure
indicates the low ductile behaviour of the steel. The experimental failure loads Pult averaged
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
8
approximately 120% of the theoretical failure load P 0ult. The cracking loads Pcr averaged 17%
of the experimental failure loads. Theoretically, failure of beams B1–B6, B8 and B10–B12 was
expected to be through shear, B9 by crushing of the concrete, B7, B13–B18 by yielding of the
steel in tension as presented in Table 2. The shear strength of beams B13–B18 was
approximately four times greater than their strength in compression or tension. While beams B1–
B12 (including B7 and B9) failed in diagonal tension which was characterised mostly by
splitting of the concrete over the horizontal tension steel bars and crushing of the concrete in
compression, failure of beams B13–B18 was predictably preceded by the yielding of the tensile
steel bars and crushing of the concrete in compression after flexural cracks had extended deep
into the compression zone.
Due to the low ductility of both main and web steel bars, the failure of the beams through
diagonal tension with yielding of the web steel was not preceded by large inelastic and plastic
deformations (Figs. 3–5). The post-cracking strain energy of the beams ranged from 206.4 to 810
Nm, and these values indicate low absorbed energies. Crack widths varied from 1.12 to 5.0 mm.
The largest cracks were produced in the beams that failed in diagonal tension.
Fig. 3Load-deflection curve for B4 Fig.4 Load-deflection curve for B12 Fig.5 Load-deflection curve for B13
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
9
8. Mode of failure of beams
Table 3 shows the theoretical and actual modes of failure, number and maximum width of cracks
in the beams. The mode of failure of the beams was influenced by the concrete strength, ratios of
main and web steel, and the shear span–effective depth ratio (av/d) of the beams, which varied
from 1.72 for beams B1–B6, 2.31 for B7–B12 and 6.25 for B13–B18. With reference to Fig. 6, a
flexural crack a–b propagated towards the loading point as the load P was increased, gradually
becoming a flexural-shear crack (or diagonal crack a– b–c). As P further increased failure
occurred in one of two modes [6]:
1. For relatively low av/d ratios as in beams B1–B12, the diagonal crack would stop at point
j and a number of cracks developed randomly in the concrete around the longitudinal
tension reinforcement. The diagonal cracks mostly formed independently and not as a
result of flexural cracks. The beams remained stable after such cracking. As the load was
increased the diagonal crack widened and propagated along the level of the longitudinal
tension reinforcement. The increased shear force pressed down the longitudinal steel and
caused a destruction of the bond between the concrete and steel leading to splitting of
concrete along a–h. The diagonal cracks also propagated into the concrete compression
zone of the beam and the loading point and eventually crushed the concrete.
2. A high av/d ratio for a beam without adequate shear reinforcement would cause the
diagonal crack to spread rapidly to point e, resulting in collapse by splitting the beam into
two parts in a diagonal tension failure. Beams B13–B18 had a high av/d = 6.25 and were
provided with adequate shear reinforcement to resist diagonal tension failure. They,
therefore, expectedly failed in pure bending.
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
10
Table: 3 Beams after failure
Beam Mode of failure Number and type of cracks Max. crack
no. Predicted Actual width (mm)
B1 Flexural shear Splitting shear bond 1 Diagonal+2 flexural+6 pure flexural 1.12
B2 Flexural shear Splitting shear bond 1 Diagonal+1 flexural+5 pure flexural 1.20
B3 Flexural shear Flexural shear crushing 2 Diagonal+2 flexural+9 pure flexural 1.86
B4 Flexural shear Flexural shear crushing 1 Diagonal+1 flexural+8 pure flexural 1.50
B5 Flexural shear Diagonal shear crushing 1 Diagonal+5 pure flexural 1.20
B6 Flexural shear Shear bond and crushing 3 Flexural shear+5 pure flexural 3.60
B7 Steel yielding Diagonal tension, shear bond 1 Diagonal+1flexural shear 5.00
B8 Flexural shear Flexural shear 1 Diagonal+5 pure flexural 2.00
B9
Concrete
crushing Concrete crushing, splitting shear 2 Diagonal+4 pure flexural 4.72
B10 Flexural shear Diagonal tension and crushing
2 Diagonal shear+1 flexural shear+11
flexural 4.00
B11 Flexural shear Shear bond and concrete crushing
2 Diagonal shear+1 flexural shear+9
flexural 3.50
B12 Flexural shear Shear bond and concrete crushing
2 Diagonal shear+1 flexural shear+8
flexural 2.50
B13 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 4 Pure flexural+ 6 flexural shear 1.15
B14 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 6 Pure flexural+ 6 flexural shear 1.40
B15 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 8 Pure flexural+ 7 flexural shear 1.20
B16 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 9 Pure flexural+ 8 flexural shear 1.15
B17 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 6 Pure flexural+ 6 flexural shear 1.30
B18 Steel yielding Tensile failure and concrete crushing 8 Pure flexural+ 6 flexural shear 1.35
Fig. 6 Diagonal Tension crack in beam
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
11
Table: 4 Post-cracking deflection and energy absorption of beams
Beam Deflection at Deflection at dmax/dcr Post-cracking
no. first crack dcr (mm) failure dmax (mm) strain energy (Nm)
B1 0.25 6.00 24 292
B3 0.60 9.80 16.3 810
B4 0.60 8.00 13.3 465
B5 0.20 6.60 33 335
B6 0.30 6.20 20.7 330
B7 0.10 6.90 69 258
B8 0.20 6.00 30 206.4
B9 0.60 10.80 18 545
B10 0.30 8.50 28.3 306
B11 1.00 11.00 11 510
B12 0.30 7.20 24 264
B13 1.00 19.50 19.5 405
B14 0.50 13.50 27 285
B15 1.00 17.00 17 345
B16 1.50 18.00 12 235
B17 1.00 15.00 15 280
B18 1.00 14.00 14 220
9. Conclusions
The flexural shear resistance of concrete beams reinforced with tensile and web steel bars milled
from re-cycled obsolete machinery and old vehicle parts in Ghana were investigated. The steel
bars, which are mostly milled with surface lugs and classified by manufacturers as mild, have
rather low ductility and high tensile strength, and develop better bond with concrete than
standard round mild steel bars. The results of the study have shown that beams provided with
large web shear steel reinforcement developed high shear resistance and did not produce any
diagonal tension cracks. A little nominal amount of web steel in the beam failed to control the
formation of wide diagonal tension shear cracks. It showed very little ductile behaviour at yield
as the diagonal crack extended and widened, leading to brittle failure of the beam. For practical
purposes, therefore, concrete beams rein-forced with such bars with limited ductile behaviour
should be sufficiently provided with relatively large web steel reinforcement to control and
reduce the widths of diagonal shear cracks and prevent brittle shear failure.
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 27(10), 928-934
12
References
1. Kankam CK, Adom-Asamoah M. Strength and ductility characteristics of reinforcing
steel bars milled from scrap metals. J Mater Des 2002; 23(6):537–45.
2. Kankam CK. Bond characteristics of reinforcing steel bars milled from scrap metals. J
Mater Des 2004; 25(3):231–8.
3. Syal IC, Goel AK. Reinforced concrete structures. 3rd ed. Wheeler Publishers; 1976. p70.
4. British Standards Institution: Structural use of concrete. BS 8110: Part 1: 1985.
5. Taylor HPJ. The fundamental behaviour of reinforced concrete beams in bending and
shear. In: Proc. ACI-ASCE shear symposium. Ottawa, 1973 (ACI special publication SP
42). ACI Detroit; 1974. p. 43–77.
6. Kong FK, Evans RH. 3rd ed. Reinforced and prestressed concrete, vol. 28. London:
Chapman & Hall Publishers; 1990. p. 119–210.
Top Related