1
Once more on medicalisation: exploring the relationship between childbirth
experiences and early motherhood in East London by Deborah Talbot
Abstract
The medicalisation thesis argues that medical science has diminished people’s ability
to cope with pain, suffering and death (Illich 1976). In the arena of childbirth,
medicalisation is seen as disempowering women to the extent that they struggle with
the challenges of motherhood (Oakley 1979, 1980). This article will explore the
medicalisation thesis as applied to childbirth, through data arising from qualitative
interviews with mothers in Walthamstow, East London. It will argue that childbirth
matters for women, and the way in which they give birth – whether it is highly
interventionist or not, whether they feel in control or not - has long-term
consequences for their emotional, psychological and physical health, their
relationships and their babies. It will also propose that various localised systems of
support are key to women’s adjustment to motherhood, whether they have had
traumatic, difficult or good births.
Keywords: iatrogenesis, traumatic, natural childbirth, post-natal depression,
community.
Introduction: childbirth and the transition to motherhood
Carrying, giving birth to, and caring for a child is still one of the biggest
transformations for women, in their lifestyle, movement, physical constraint,
identities, sense of self and emotional scope (Elliot et al. 2009, Thomson et al. 2011).
Wolf (2001, p.5), for example, talks about the experience as one of death and
2
confronting ones mortality, whether this is the death of a former self and mourning for
its loss, or the actual biological memory of the strong association of death with
childbirth; in short, women are confronting the 'deepest questions possible'. Cusk
(2002) focuses on the sense of (or actual) subjugation experienced by new mothers, an
experience that Stadlen (2007) argues we are unprepared for. While in previous
generations, women were groomed for childrearing, or perhaps more generously were
around, and were expected to care for, babies from an early age, many contemporary
women in the West are brought up under the guise of freedom and equality, only to
feel its absolute loss in pregnancy, birth and early childcare. Moreover, very few
women have the opportunity to be around babies and learn childrearing practices
(Oakley 1980, Stadlen 2007). Childbirth, experienced for the first time, can be said
therefore to express a sense of rupture, both in identity and in the level of suffering
and pain.
What role does childbirth play in this important moment of transition? As Oakley
(1980) rightly pointed out, the ‘medical model’ poses this question as a purely
biological one, the criteria for success being low infant and maternal mortality; to
manage this, births have become highly medicalised. Childbirth is in fact one of the
areas Illich (1976) uses to express the idea of clinical, social and cultural iatrogenesis,
meaning that medical interventions can be counterproductive for health. Illich argues
that medicalisation has implications for our ego formation, encouraging dependence
and helplessness. The woman is decentred in the medicalised birth (Martin 2001),
raising questions of the impact of this on their sense of self. This causal relationship is
of particular importance for the consideration of childbirth explored in this article.
What is the impact of the ‘medicalisation of childbirth’ on women, including their
3
ability to mother? What implications are there for society in understanding childbirth
as a complicated interrelationship between the biological, psychological and
emotional process?
Seemingly we as a culture remain confused as to whether childbirth is a normal or a
medical event (Day-Stirk 2005, Scamell and Alaszewski 2012). Should labour take
place at home, in birthing centres, or in a hospital ward? Should women try and
experience pain as a developmental experience or take any pain relief going? Should
we adopt a system of planned cesareans or try and cut the overall rate of emergency
and planned c-sections? Should midwives or obstetricians dominate professionally?
What are our rituals of childbirth (Lomas 1966) and what should they be? As Oakley
noted, the concerns of the medical professions and mothers to be are different. As
already noted the former is concerned with mortality, while the mothers she
interviewed were concerned also with what she calls ‘quality of life’ issues, meaning
their emotional and psychological wellbeing. Teijlingen (2005) also notes the
confusing divergence between what he refers to as the ‘medical’ and ‘social’ models,
ones that do not address one another. Midwifery sits uneasily between these divergent
concerns, and indeed, as Teijlingen (2005) points out, opinion lies on a continuum
between the two positions.
More recently the medicalisation thesis has found its way back into sociological
discourse after some years of absence (Coxon et al 2014), through a critique of the
concept of risk and risk management (Scamell and Alaszewski 2012). Again while the
medical model seeks to eliminate risk, in the course of which interpreting it as purely
physical risk, there is a case to question risk in childbirth as more diverse and
4
inclusive of concerns such as the emotional and psychological wellbeing of the
mother, the father, both parent’s identity transitions, and the baby and his or her
development. This latter thought has more in common with what Breen (1975, p.25)
describes as a 'bio-social' approach (see also Rossi 1977), that pregnancy and birth
and all it entails marks a women's development, much as adolescence does. Reiger
and Dempsy (2006) also address the ‘crisis’ of childbirth in our risk adverse culture.
They refer to childbirth as a ‘biopsychocultural’ moment, and, in perhaps what is a
reference back to Illich, suggest that birthing can be understood as performance, one
that requires overcoming challenges (for example, the psychological nature of pain)
and which requires support to do so. Risk therefore is more ambiguous than the
medical mode suggests and can be judged from different and competing perspectives,
with medicalisation posing its own risks for the woman, including physical ones
(Martin 2001, Rothman 2014). It suggests a need to understand childbirth in all its
biological, psychological and emotional complexity.
The symbolic and emotional importance of the birth has been indicated in several
research studies. Dahlen et al (2010), for example, in their research with first-time
mothers, found that women themselves felt that childbirth was a significant moment
and that they felt empowered or disempowered depending on the type of birth they
had had. Storytelling about their birth helped to both facilitate social networks and
resolve their feelings about the birth (Callister 2004). Simkin’s (1991, 1992, 2006)
research found similar distributions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction that were
related to feelings of empowerment and control, and argued the role of the caregiver
was critical in the kind of birth women experienced (Eames 2004, Baker 2010). Not
surprisingly perhaps much research has focused on negative experiences of birth and
5
the impact of depression or trauma for women (Fenech and Thomson 2014). The
inclusion of ‘birth trauma’ might require some comment, as its consideration is fairly
new, as most psychiatric problems following birth are classified as post-natal
depression (Birth Trauma Association 2014). Birth trauma is not considered a
distinctive psychiatric condition from post-traumatic stress disorder, and the Birth
Trauma Association (BTA) considers it a normal reaction to a ‘threat of death or
serious injury’ to themselves or others (that is, their baby). Symptoms might include
nightmares and flashbacks, cognitive difficulties, avoidance of stressful situations,
anxiety and depression (BTA 2014).
Fenech and Thomson (2014) conducted a thorough review of the trauma literature and
found that birth trauma had long-term consequences for women’s sense of self and
their relationships. ‘Birth trauma’, they argue, ‘changes women forever as their past,
present and future selves become lost ideals’ (p.191). Birth trauma is linked feelings
of losing control, problems with bonding and relationships, struggling with feelings of
failure, and these feelings are generally linked to medical intervention of some sort:
having a hysterectomy following birth (Elmire et al. 2011), a C-Section or operative
vaginal birth (Gamble and Creedy 2005, Fenwick et al. 2009, Herishanu-Gilutz et al,
2009, Birthrights 2013). But they can also be linked to generalized self-reported
negative experiences (Waldenström 2004, Stadimayr et al. 2006, Mercier et al. 2012)
or what Simkin (2006) perhaps describes as feelings of dissatisfaction, which might
not be associated with specific medical interventions but a lack of support.
Less researched seemingly is the impact of trauma on babies. So far it has been
understood that a traumatised mother may experience bonding and attachment
6
problems (Steen et al. 2013), leading to an emotionally negative impact on the baby.
Cassels (2013) found that empathy was lessened in children born in hospital and
under epidural, although the reasons for that not established. Emerson (2001),
however, reporting on his therapeutic work with children of birth trauma, found that
trauma produced babies prone to crying, with poor feeding, restlessness, and
resistance to touch. Children who had had traumatic births had feelings of incapability
and neediness. Like practitioners in the profession of osteopathy (Rosen 2014) and
psychotherapy, it was discussed as a separate trauma to that of the mother.
Feelings of power and control seem central to women’s experience of the birthing
process. Dana Breen’s (1981) case study of Barbara, illustrated the processes by
which women become disempowered and how differently women feel when they are
in control; this has long-term consequences for how they feel as mothers and how
they feel towards their children. Early research, such as that conducted by Breen and
Oakley (1980) very much located feelings of powerlessness as being a product of the
‘medical model’ of over-intervention making decisions for women, with women
feeling as either ‘victims’ or ‘victors’. Did they relinquish control to doctors (and
midwives, under the chain of command of medicine) or were they triumphant over
labour? That Scamell and Alaszewski (2012) found in their research that the process
of birthing was dominated by risk-assessment so that midwives were ‘unable to
articulate and defend normality' (p.210) is alarming, and illustrates how the medical
model is reframed in the contemporary context as a struggle to define what is normal
(Gould 2000). Kehily (1914) reported that in her research on modern motherhood,
women were preoccupied by risk and safety in childbirth and therefore felt unable to
make autonomous decisions. Naomi Wolf’s personal account of her two births is
7
instructive, however, in that is not so much the level of medical intervention –
because both her births ended in C-Sections - as the feelings of control and respect
shown throughout that was important.
In popular narratives it has been argued that women have too high expectations of
their birth, encouraged by birth plans. However, Cook and Loomis (2012) conducted
research on the influence of birth plans and whether these constructed impossible
expectations, and found that it was not so much that birth plans were altered in the
birth, but the degree of change from the plan and how much women felt in control of
the decision making were critical in terms of how much women felt disappointed and
affected by their birth. Again, it was not so much that women experienced medical
intervention; rather it was how this was done and whether they felt in control and
treated with empathy and sensitivity. This tallies with recent thinking about respect
and dignity in childbirth as being more important than setting up a dichotomy
between medicalised and natural births (Bowser and Hill 2010, Birthrights 2013,
McConville 2014).
From the literature therefore we know that experiences of childbirth has a
psychological and emotional impact and needs to be considered as a complicated
interrelationship between the biological, psychological, emotional and socio-cultural,
although here there is much research yet to be done. What is missing is a need to
make a connection between childbirth as a symbolic event for the mother-to-be and
the experiences of first time and early motherhood (that is their recollections of the
first years of their children’s life)? It is this causative relationship that adds weight to
the need to rethink the role of medicine within childbirth, gives it social import, and
8
brings into focus Illich’s more radical and wide-ranging critique of the impact of
medicine on the ego. The research that forms the basis of this article is based on a
small sample, and makes for an uneasy elucidation of causation (much like the
challenges faced by Oakley over three decades ago). It aims to point the way to the
need for further research to be done.
Methodology
The research on which this article is based was a sample of twenty-seven women and
mothers in Walthamstow. The original aim of the research was to explore mothers’
feelings about risk-taking in their children’s lives. Because of the author’s own
experience of birth trauma and the transference of anxiety onto ones offspring
however, a substantial part of the interviews and findings focused on women’s
pregnancy and birthing experiences, how this prepared them for motherhood and they
way they negotiated fears and perceptions of risk. Because the research connected the
experience with the aftermath in this way, the causative relationship between birthing
experience and motherhood emerged from the women’s own narratives. In order to
assess the likely impact of other causative influences (such as work and life stresses) I
also asked the women about their months of pregnancy. Also important were the
women’s narratives about themselves, their identity and view of their own
personalities. It should be borne in mind that establishing causation between birthing
experience and motherhood is a multi-causal struggle (Oakley 1980), yet in many
ways my own findings seemed to starkly represent a causal relationship particularly
when ‘good/great’ births and traumatic births (Simkin 2006) were considered. My
9
own data however, should be seen as a small sample; one that points to the need for
more research and policy change.
The mothers were selected on the basis of whether they had children under five.
Oakley (1980), Simkin (1991), and Dahlen et al. (2010) have all argued that the first
birth is the most significant moment of transition in women’s identity as a mother.
Although many of the women interviewed had more than one child, it was perhaps the
first that remained most significant in their stories. For many of the women
interviewed there was a significant gap between the first birth and the interview, and
research has suggested that while women do retain long-term memories of childbirth
they are more fluid and detailed when nearer to the moment of birth (Simkin 1991,
1992, Talbot 2013a). It was certainly the case in this research that those women who
had given birth more recently focused more on the pregnancy and birth than mothers
who had older children, but stories of birth were nevertheless very present.
The research took a person-centred approach to the women’s narratives (Miller 2005),
that is, non-directive, participatory and respectful of women’s expressed subjectivities
that replicated the way that women wanted to talk about their births (Callister 2004,
Dahlen et al, 2010, Talbot 2014). The sample was drawn from online networks local
to Walthamstow, such as Walthamstow Parents Online (one that I had set up and now
discontinued) and the Facebook site WFParents (a pseudonym). Drawing a sample
from online networks is commonly seen as limiting representation. However, broadly
the sample consisted of the working middle-classes and working-classes (and
arguably there is not much distinction between the two in a high-cost area such as
London), the sample was fairly ‘international’. All had settled in Walthamstow and,
10
bar one, had been there a fairly long time. Two of the sample had lived in
Walthamstow but had then moved to Chingford and Highams Park (about 10 minutes
drive but culturally very different). Who wasn’t represented? The urban poor and
marginalized, most definitely, and also the most wealthy, but that doesn’t alter the
relevance of the causal relationship examined (Oakley 1980, Ribbens 1998). It is a
point to be observed and to define the scope of future study. Ethical approval for the
research was granted by the Open University’s Human Research Ethics Committee.
Volunteers were sent an information sheet and consent form. About a ten potential
participants did not respond after this point. Participants were sent a report of the
analysis and invited to comment, and were invited to attend dissemination events.
Thus the research adopted the technique of respondent validation. However, while the
women said that they had enjoyed reading about the research, and some even talked
about emotional catharsis, none raised questions or reinterpretations of it, so there
were limits in terms of a validation method (Barbour 2001). Participants were offered
a nanny, and about half of those interviewed took advantage of this, often expressing
relief at having been given a break. As Holloway (1998) and Talbot (2013b) found,
geography is important in the formation of social attitudes. That the sample was
drawn from the London locality of Walthamstow and its locale was important
particularly in understanding networks of support available to women.
The research is also biographical (Ribbens 1998). The idea for researching in this
field, and the rationale for the questions I have asked, arose from my own birth
trauma, which was a long and disastrous induction followed by emergency C-Section,
and preceded by medical problems in my pregnancy and work-related stress. This has
11
implicated the research throughout in an outsider/insider dilemma often presented as
an ethical conundrum for research with regard to ethics and validity (Kvale 1995). I
am close to the story some women are telling, so naturally narratives of trauma both
attracted my attention and engaged with my own story (although I was the only one
who had had multiple traumas of life, pregnancy and birth). Yet is was also
illuminating and inspiring to hear stories of the ‘good’ birth (Simkin 2006), and
comparing the two both led to personal revelations and research insights. My own
experience and the emotional ‘soaking’ I re-experienced with every interview and
analysis of the interviews dictated the presentation of the research as somewhat
emotionally engaged. I have through this research entered the terrain of what
academia likes to call ‘public engagement’, by working with the dignity and rights
activist group Birthrights, which has stimulated further critical reflection. I would take
the view therefore, like ethnographic thinkers such as Becker (1967) and Hammersley
(2000) that partisanship can enhance research and scholarship, if those perspectives
are made visible.
A note on terminology: I have referred to traumatic births as those who reported that
they experienced trauma and that it had had noted consequences. On the other end of
the spectrum I have referred to women who had ‘good’ births, those who reported
their births using words such as easy, without problem, short, and that it felt
empowering in some way. That does not mean they did not experience some
problems, particularly the home birthers where only one said they had supportive
care. Like Oakley’s (1980) findings, the numbers of women experiencing the good
birth were few, with the majority encountering some sort of difficulty either with the
process of birthing itself or the support available. Somewhere in the middle I have
12
referred to the women who problematized their birth in some way. They lie on a
spectrum but did not identify themselves as having experienced birth trauma as such;
mostly they pointed to the problems that they had experienced, that it was emotionally
troubling and that it had had some impact on the way they thought about motherhood.
Other had what might be described as natural births but they were interfered with in
some way perceived to be ruinous (for example, being transferred from a birthing unit
to the labour ward at the last moment). This in some way correspondents to Simkin’s
(2006) distinction between good, great, disappointing and traumatic births, but is
probably more messy that this. Often the interpretation of ones experiences depended
on the presence of some kind of political thinking about it.
The presentation of data has been grouped into three substantial areas. Firstly, that
there was a considerable rupture in narratives of pregnancy and birth. In addition,
there were significant differences in the narratives of women who had experienced
trauma and those that had experienced the ‘good’ birth. Second, the birthing
experience had significant consequences for feelings about motherhood and for
babies, in the women’s accounts. Third, that support is critical although it should not
be only articulated in terms of support by the medical profession; support can be
thought about as medical, familial, and community-based. The conclusion will reflect
on the findings both in terms of understanding the importance of labour as emotional
and psychological, as well as physical, and that this has consequences for
understanding the social relevance of childbirth.
Research findings
13
Narratives of pregnancy, birth and trauma
Nearly all interviewees, although there are some exceptions, said that their
pregnancies were good and enjoyable, regardless of the aches, pains and sickness.
This was regardless of whether the women had self-disclosed birth trauma. As is
common, many of the women had had second pregnancies by the time they were
interviewed, and women often reported being less fascinated and more tired than with
their first. Here some of the women describe their first birth:
...It felt like quite the natural thing to be pregnant and to be expecting him and the
pregnancy was fine, was quite exciting, fascinating to be pregnant...(2 home births,
both natural deliveries).
...The pregnancy was ok, I was quite sick for the first 3 months and then I was fine. I
had quite a lot of back problems though...(First birth back to back – where the back of
the baby’s head is facing the mothers spine causing greater pain, long labour,
ventouse and forceps).
...it was quite fun I thought, yes I mean I enjoyed, I slept badly and got a really sore
back and all those things but I still really enjoyed it, yes for me it was just really a
positive experience...(birth by induction and forceps, broken coccyx – tailbone - and
bladder trauma).
It is interesting that the women felt that despite the normal problems associated with
their pregnancies, it was felt to be an enjoyable and interesting experience. This
14
contrasted with narratives of birth. Many of the women I interviewed described the
birth in fairly extreme terms. The following was typical:
...had a homebirth with my first child but it was a very, very traumatic labour and
delivery and that was very difficult, it felt like I had been kidnapped and tortured
basically for 24 hours...(Mother who had two home births, both natural deliveries,
and the first had felt unsupported).
...it’s like you feel like you’ve been through a car crash, you feel like, you know,
you’ve been run over by a truck because you’re absolutely exhausted, physically and
emotionally.. (Mother who had an induction after being ten days overdue, baby
delivered by ventouse).
...I think I was the palest I’ve ever been in my life and it just wasn’t myself at all. I
remember one of my first trips out, and just feeling really vulnerable...and like, I’ve
got to go home now, like the world was just too much. Urm, I think I was, yeah,
physically really broken...(Mother describing traumatic first birth ending in C-
Section).
The language used by the women was very powerful and extreme - car crash,
kidnapped and tortured, broken – and suggestive of a severe rupture. Obviously birth
can feel like quite an extreme experience, physically, psychologically and
emotionally; one associated with great change and as already noted (Wolf 2001)
difficult feelings of death and dying. It is possible that the strong language being used
by women to describe their birth is a symbolic representation of the transition from
15
one self to another (Thomson et al. 2011, Wolf 2001) in which the birth amongst
becomes the prism for those complicated and transforming events (Kehily 2014). To
what extent though might the extreme language used by these women indicate a
cultural lack of orientation to the realities of childbirth, or a reaction to
medicalisation?
In the cases where births had been reported as either traumatic or ‘good’, there were
alternatively very strong negative and positive feelings about the birth and it seemed
related to the degree of medicalisation. It is worth reporting on numbers here,
although as a small-scale qualitative study this can be by no means generalized. Self-
reported traumatic births – by which I mean they were referred to as traumatic and
were seen as having lasting consequences - accounted for three of those interviewed.
Those who had reported (on the whole) ‘good’ births accounted for six of the women
interviewed (and three of those were home births). The following are some examples
of the traumatic and good births viewed through the prism of medicalisation or its
absence:
…I felt like I’d been tortured…I had a failed induction that lasted 4 days, a failed
epidural [anesthetic injection in the back which stops pain from the back downwards]
so I couldn’t walk, repeated and painful cannulas [a tube inserted by needle into the
body to deliver medicines and take blood], ended by an emergency C-Section…they
just did every medical procedure going..(Induction, emergency C-Section).
16
...in the end I gave birth naturally, so it was very painful beforehand, but then
afterwards I felt very good, fantastic, I just recovered within a few days...(Long labour
and gave birth in high risk department).
...It just seemed like the thing to do, so I did. And it, it was nice, I felt afterwards sort
of powerful... I felt that I’d done something really powerful, and wonderful, and she
was so alert when she was born, I knew I’d done it right (Home birth, natural birth).
These are just examples of the narratives used. In general, women expressed the idea
that ‘autonomy’ (being free from interference) and control allowed them to have
better births. Both Breen and Wolf write in different ways about how women can
experience a better birth second time around by being able to exercise more control,
even in the outcome may or may not result in a vaginal delivery. This is expressed in
the mother’s accounts:
...he, it was a vaginal birth, and it was great...I pushed and pushed and pushed, and
out he came, and I was just like so proud of myself. Ah hah you don’t know anything,
I mean obviously they were brilliant and everything, but it was just like feeling so
triumphant. ... I could feel him coming out, it was amazing, you know, it really was. I
felt so good (Mother discussing second birth by vaginal delivery after first with
forceps).
...I felt really empowered, going through labour and getting fully dilated, and trying
to push him out... I feel really proud of myself for urm, for going through all that kind
17
of thing...(Mother discussing birth of second child, which because he was too large
ended up in a C-Section).
From these accounts having a vaginal birth was an aspiration and associated with a
sense of achievement. The women who sat on the ‘extremes’ mostly experienced
good first pregnancies but their feelings about birth differed. With some exceptions
(for example a diabetic mother who could not avoid intervention as the birth had to be
highly managed), this depended on whether their birth had been highly medicalised or
not. For those that experienced good births, it is interesting that the language
corresponds to the sense of power and self-determination summed up in Oakley’s
(1980) depiction of her interviewees as ‘victors’ who had triumphed over their labour.
For the majority however, the experience was narrated as problematised but not
described as traumatic, with some key points highlighted as particular problems.
These included:
• Questions over the necessity of inductions
• Over-monitoring, internal examinations, forced labour on back
• Pain relief pushed on them and not explained, or denied
• Being turned away from the labour ward despite very long labour at home
• Being subjected to stressful transfers from birthing units to labour wards
• Unsympathetic home birth midwives
• Variable midwife care
• Consultants lacking in empathy
• Being turned away from ICUs
18
• Poor communication (lacking in empathy)
• Awful post-natal experiences: bad environments and told to shrug off
experience
• Woeful post-natal care in the community
• Ignorant health visitors
• Untreated physical and emotional scars
That so many women described problematic experiences described above is troubling.
While one might expect childbirth to be physically shocking as has already been
explored, many of the comments relate to an absence of ‘dignified’ care, which has an
association with medicalisation as an concept (Birthrights 2013). Most of the
complaints listed here pertain to issues of poor communication, risk assessment and
the birth environment, issues that the dignity campaigners have highlighted as issues
and indeed midwives are themselves aware of, and which pertain to the neglect of the
critical emotional, psychological and symbolic importance of birth for women
(Birthrights 2013) and the importance of control (Oakley 1980, Fox and Worts 1999).
The responses are also concerned with the birth environment, and, although not a
dominant theme of the research, women who birthed at home (with a supportive
midwife), in birthing centres or even in one case a high-risk unit, had a better
experience than those in the labour ward. All had poor experiences to relay of post-
natal environments – including a lack of support, noise and a lack of privacy, poor
breastfeeding support, and the imposition of traditional visiting hours – that added
insult to injury for those forced to stay longer because of surgery.
The impact of birthing experiences on early motherhood
19
Assessing the impact of birthing experiences on motherhood – meaning ones identity
transition, emotional and psychological stability – has an uneasy causation as has
already been noted. In many ways Oakley’s (1980) study wrestled with this
empirically in a way that has not been replicated since. In many ways ones birthing
experience is a product and springboard to a range of contextual issues, from
relationship problems to mental and physical health prior to pregnancy (Thomson
2011). Is it absurd therefore to pinpoint the experience of childbirth as central?
However to claim difficulties of causation and complexity is to deny the importance
of women’s subjectivities in terms of the relative importance they give this moment,
because ‘for most mothers childbirth is not a trivial event’ (Oakley 1986, p.2) and as
Simkin has argued (1991, 1992) memories of childbirth alongside its perceived
importance are retained long after the birth, and into older age. This perspective came
out strongly in the research findings.
In the narratives of the women interviewed a fairly familiar pattern emerged of a
relationship between traumatic or difficult labours and negative psychological and
emotional consequences including their adjustment to motherhood. That is, they
struggled with some aspect of motherhood, whether this was having an unsettled or
colicky baby, residual feelings of trauma or suspected depression, feelings of failure,
fear of not bonding well. Perhaps significantly for this study, some reported feeling
more feelings of anxiety about their children. Some said they wouldn't consider
having another child after the experiences they'd had (Fenech and Thomson 2014).
The following were typical of all of these points:
20
… I think I had a lot of unresolved stuff though about perhaps feeling that I’d failed,
or, urm, that if only I’d, if only I’d tried harder, or, or done it better, that I would
have had a normal delivery (Mother describing aftermath of birth which was painful
labour, C-Section and hemorrhaging).
…I had extreme anxiety and I think what was post-traumatic stress…I no longer knew
who I was, what I’d been, that I was competent and capable. I kept on saying that I’d
died, I’d died…I didn’t know why no-one could understand me...it was like my mind
was a thousand pieces of glass littering the floor…(Range of medical procedures
under induction and emergency C-Section).
...I felt like my body had let me down…(Induced at 10 days overdue).
Central to some of these points are a sense of disassociation from their bodies and
their identities, and strong feelings of failure.
Significantly mothers who had had a C-Section or instrumental birth were more likely
to report that their babies were colicky or unsettled (Emerson 2001) and many sought
help from cranial osteopaths:
...the weeks afterwards I felt he was really unsettled, I think a lot of people think that,
everyone talks about colic don’t they, but he was, he really cried a lot and I think that
was to do with the ventouse...(Son born under induction).
21
Those who had had in their eyes good births tended to find the transition to
motherhood easier: better adjustment to the new identity, easy babies, easier to
maintain some connection to their old mobility and lifestyle. One mother for example
talked about the impact of giving birth in hospital in 20 minutes and a fairly short
labour:
I always felt that having such a easy positive start made the first few weeks so easy...
We weren’t really, I mean we were tired because we had a baby crying all night, but
it seems to be a different level, and you know, we tried in those first couple of weeks to
do all the things that a lot of the milestones, like going on the tube with her, and going
in the car, and both of us driving with her in the back, so it was done, and we were
ready for the next bit. And then B went back to work, you know it wasn’t a big deal to
get on the tube, or it wasn’t a huge thing. I mean it still is, 'cos the logistics of getting
a baby between feeds and nappy changes and sleeps and bags and you know,
suitcases load of stuff you carry around into the car is still a mission. But it’s the
mental block of doing its gone... she’s been a very, very easy relaxed kid. And I think
I mean you don’t know, one plays against the other, but it certainly helps.
Here the mother makes strong interconnections between the short and unproblematic
birth and her own sense of fearlessness, confidence, strength and vitality, and also her
babies personality and her sense of being bonded to her. This sense of confidence was
also reflected in the other mothers who had had ‘good’ births. Two of the mothers
who had had good births commented however on their sense of exclusion from the
dominant narrative of trauma:
22
I’m the woman who has to keep her mouth shut to be honest with you. Utterly
uneventful, on both fronts …its difficult to explain but you know, you know, you don’t
want to be the smug one... I think when women are vulnerable, in those first few
months after having a baby, you don’t really want to go on about how great your life
is. Cos you don’t want to detract from the fact that they’re having a crappy time and
they need to get it out you know…(women who had had two relatively easy births)
... none of the kind of horror stories really. Urm, which then made me feel a bit
guilty. I remember I went to one parent group, we lived in Hackney when he was
born, and was kind of, just felt quite excluded because I didn’t have a blood, guts and
gore story to say...I feel like, there’s a lot of assumed, people assume negativity, all
the kind of default discourses were negative ones. And actually that hasn’t been my
experience...and then finding that a little bit excluding, so that was the kind of only
weird thing. Urm, which probably meant that I just hadn’t really bothered with
parenty groups and things like that…(Two home births)
These two women had had uncomplicated and in the words of one ‘great’ births, and
both felt a greater sense of ease, enjoyment and relaxation about being a mother.
However, they also felt excluded from, or unrepresented in, mothering communities.
It is possible that as outlined in the literature above birth tends to be interrogated
through the prism of trauma and understanding birthing through the lens of the good
or great birth (Simkin 2006) is equally important for understanding how birthing
impacts upon motherhood.
23
Understanding that there is a relationship between the good birth and an enjoyment of
mothering does not mean to say that traumatic births always lead to a problematic
outcome. In many ways, those that had traumatic stories to tell had also spent a great
deal of time reflecting on aspects of parenting, love, bonding, and how they are
raising their kids. This is also true of some of the mothers that had easier births. I
would argue that whether ones birth was traumatic or not, this kind of reflection bode
well for their relationship with their children; far from trauma threatening the bonding
process, the shock of it may well prompt deeper thought about ones actions, self,
identity and relationships. This sits with, for example, Breen's thoughts about
motherhood being part of a process of development (Breen 1981). Those open to
reflecting on it, or it was in some way facilitated (Simkin 2006), ultimately had more
settled sense of selves, and relaxed relationships with their children.
One way this process of reflection was revealed was through dreams. As Breen (1981)
outlines, dreams are revealing during pregnancy and its aftermath. Wolf also argues
that dreaming 'seems to prepare the pregnant woman for motherhood' (2001, p.125);
the dreams consist of fears of neglect and a lack of care towards the baby, of losing
them accidentally. In this research, dreams assisted in not only understanding what
motherhood was, but also in the recovery process itself. One mother had this to say
about her dreams:
...I had many dreams about my daughter when she was first born. Many were about
me leaving her somewhere because I was preoccupied, ones where I was not paying
attention to her very frequently and she turned into a fax image or a doll. I think I
understood after that that unless I poured myself in her, physically and emotionally,
24
she wouldn't grow. She has turned out to be very high needs [spirited] so I suppose
that is true. I also had a dream that she crawled back up the birth canal and then was
rebirthed, if you like [this mother had had a traumatic birth ending in C-Section].
Oddly it was odd that it was only after that she felt like mine, and I felt a lot better.
Often the greater soul searching involved provoked political involvement, a career
change or a resolution to stand up to medical staff for later births (Zadoroznji 1999,
Wolf 2001). This process might also be a reflection of the specific locality this
research was conducted in. Walthamstow in the interviews was noted as being more
left-field, community-orientated, with high levels of attachment parenting techniques
and breastfeeding in the mothers interviewed, regardless of their social class
(Holloway 1998, Talbot 2013). The specific location of this research illustrated in fact
something very important about the birthing process and the post-natal healing
process: the importance of support.
The critical importance of support
Critical to the experience one has in the birthing process, or afterwards whether this
be recovering from a traumatic experience, trying to breastfeed, trying to learn how to
care for ones baby and adjust to motherhood, is support (Baker 2010). However, the
nature of this support merits further exploration. Research in midwifery journals for
obvious reasons has focused on what midwives should or should not be doing (Eames
2004, Hunter et al. 2008, Lyburg and Severinsson 2010). However, if we consider that
birthing has not just physical but a broad ranging lifestyle, emotional, psychological
and identity transformative consequences for women, are midwives really able to hold
25
this in its entirety? This research in fact suggest that they do not need to (Baker 2010)
albeit how they are is important (Lyburg and Severinsson 2010). As outlined above
women did tend to reflect on the attitude of their caregivers but these were largely
concerned with the need for minor adjustments of behaviour and communication;
small acts of kindness in terms of practical and emotional support (Wolf 2001,
Birthrights 2013) were remembered and noted by the women interviewed:
...they were saying I’m sorry sweetie, come on, we’ll just you know, stroking me,
because I felt like a child. I said I have no strength any more, I just you know, I was
just so fragile basically. And what they did, they looked for an Italian nurse in the
hospital, to basically come and give me a bit of comfort.. (Mother who was herself
Italian, describing her experience of midwives in the high-risk department).
….Because I had a C-Section my milk took 6 days in the end to come on fully. There
had been a lot of fussing in the hospital with positions and so forth, which was very
stressful, but once I got home and was expressing a bit but not feeding, a midwife,
very experienced she was, just gently told me I needed to sit up more so my boobs
would be in a better position. It worked, I was so happy I cried and thanked her
profusely. I still get tearful now when I think about that, she doesn't know what that
meant to me...(4 day induction and C-Section).
The fact that women remembered these small acts of kindness suggest that emotional
care is critical to the birthing process (Prochaska and McGuinness 2014), and these do
not need to be extraordinary. However, the women interviewed also noted the crucial
importance of a female presence (Odent 1999, Pascali-Bonaro and Kroeger 2004),
26
supportive partners, the presence of their family or friends after the birth, and
critically the very organized and widespread parenting networks of Walthamstow,
whether it be NCT groups, online forums, friendship groups from parks and
playgroups (Talbot 2013), to their experience of birthing and its aftermath. There
have been massive social changes and dislocations to traditional family and
community networks in the UK, and it is often expected that institutions will bear the
burden of those transitions; however, this research illustrated that networks can be
formed in spite of the fragmentations of family and community (Talbot 2013). The
purpose of social support in this respect was that it allowed for non-judgmental
reflection; and it was certainly the case that, whether women had a good, a difficult,
or a traumatic birth, processing the experience with other supportive mothers had had
positive impacts for them and their relationships. It is equally concerning therefore
that two women who experienced a ‘good’ birth experienced a sense of dislocation
from other mothers.
However, the research also found that there were connections between networks and
being ‘middle-class’ and/or British. As Oakley argues of class it is notoriously
difficult to define in the context of conducting research on attitudes and behaviours,
and this is particularly so on the London context (Talbot 2013). However, those with
less money could not necessarily access support networks such as National Childbirth
Trust antenatal classes and groups, and other kinds of support, such as doulas (paid
birthing advocates) and alternative therapies. Critically resolving problems such as
tongue-tie that significantly impacts upon ones capacity to breastfeed often required
private assistance because NHS waiting lists were too long; eleven women had babies
with tongue tie, a few more who had problems breastfeeding that might have been
27
related. Not all could afford the private medical fee to get their babies tongues
clipped.
It was noteworthy that those interviewed who had migrated from another country felt
less connected to the community than English or Irish interviewees, particularly if
they had come from very close-knit communities and families. Important also were
the absence of therapeutic groups (Stadlen 2007); only one interviewee sought help
from a therapist for her traumatic experiences. Yet research shows that women do
have a need to talk about their birth story (Callister 2004, Baxter et al. 2014). It seems
urgent to consider the kinds of support mothers, fathers, midwives and other medical
personnel might need in order to be able to fully engage with the emotional and
psychological significance of childbirth and allow them the space to process their
experience.
Conclusion
In summary, this research has demonstrated that from the standpoint of women’s own
narratives about their births and lives as mothers, there exists an important and under-
explored relationship between childbirth and experiences of motherhood. Those who
had traumatic births, whether they expressed it in those terms or not, tended to
struggle more with aspects of motherhood, whether this be strong feelings of failure
or cognitive dissonance, than mothers who had had the ‘good’ birth.
The research also demonstrated the critical importance of support, and the time and
space to reflect on ones experience, as significantly affecting the long-term outcomes
28
of experiences of motherhood. In addition, the kind of birth one has is related to the
degree of medicalisation on the one hand, and feelings of control on the other,
particularly where there has been either a good birth or a traumatic birth. However,
women can be offered a sense of control even when medical intervention has been
high. Further, that many women cited issues of lack of respect and ‘dignity’ as being
important.
This is suggestive of the need to consider childbirth as a complex interrelationship
between the biological, the psychological and the emotional, and one that has
profound social effects where these matters are not considered. Women’s sense of
themselves, their emotional and psychological health, and their relationships can be
significantly affected by the kind of birth they had. Similarly, the social, meaning in
this case social and community support, can aid the process of healing and the
transition to motherhood.
While there have been important strides made recently in terms of reflecting on the
relationship of childbirth and post-natal depression and trauma (Fenech and Thomson
2014) and attempts to find a new language of care in the concepts of respect and
dignity (Bowser and Hill 2010, Birthrights 2013, McConville 2014), more needs to be
done to, not just reform, but revolutionise the way we think about birth.
Acknowledgments
To Nicky McGuinness, who conducted a review of a range of midwifery literature
included in this article, funded by the Centre of Citizenship, Identities and
29
Governance (CCIG) at the Open University, and to Elizabeth Prochaska of
Birthrights, who is making a stand on respectful care.
References
Baker K. (2010). The importance of effective support during childbirth. British
Journal of Midwifery, 18, 10, 665-668.
Barbour, R.S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case
of the tail wagging the dog. British Medical Journal, May 5, 2001, 322(7294),
1115–1117.
Baxter J.D., McCourt, C. and Jarrett, P.M. (2014). What is current practice in offering
debriefing services to post partum women an what are the perceptions of women in
accessing these services: A critical review of the literature. Midwifery, 30, 2, 194–
219
Becker, H.S. (1967). ‘Whose side are we on?’ Social Problems, 14, 239-47.
Birthrights (2013). The Dignity Survey 2013: Women’s and midwives experiences of
UK maternity care. London. Birthrights.
Birth Trauma Association (2014)
http://www.birthtraumaassociation.org.uk/what_is_trauma.htm Accessed 28th March
2014.
30
Bowser, D. and Hill, K. (2010). Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in
Facility-Based Childbirth: Report of a Landscape. USAID_TRIaction Project,
Harvard School of Public Health.
Breen, D. (1975). The birth of a first child. London. Tavistock publications.
Breen, D. (1981). Talking with mothers, about pregnancy, childbirth and early
motherhood. London. Jill Norman Ltd.
Callister, L.C. (2004). Making Meaning: Women’s birth Narratives. Journal of
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing, 33, 4, 508-518.
Cassels, T.G. (2013). The long-term effects of birthing interventions on childhood
empathy. Midwifery, 30, 4, 471-5.
Cook, K. and Loomis, C. (2012). The impact of choice and control on women's birth
experiences. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 21, 3, 158-168.
Coxon, K., Sandall, J. and Fulop, N.J. (2014). To what extent are women free to
choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility
influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk and Society, 6, 1, 51-67.
Cusk, R. (2002). A life’s work: on becoming a mother. London. Fourth Estate.
Dahlen, H.G., Barclay, L.M. and Homer, C.S.E. (2010). Processing the first birth:
journeying into ‘motherland. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 13-14, 1977-1985.
31
Day-Stirk, F. (2005). The big push for a normal birth. Midwives, 8, 1, 18-20.
Eames, C. (2004). Midwives’ role in preparing women for birth. British Journal of
Midwifery, 12, 7, 447-450.
Elliot, H., Gunaratnam, Y., Hollway, W. and Phoenix, A. (2009). ‘Practices,
identification and identity change in the transition to motherhood’ in Wetherall, W.
(ed). Theorizing Identities and Social Action. Basingstoke, Macmillan Palgrave.
Elmire, R., Schmied, V., Wilkes, L. and Jackson, D. (2011). Separation, failure and
temporary relinquishment: women’s experiences of early mothering in the context of
emergency hysterectomy. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 7-8, 1119-1127.
Emerson, W. (2001). Treating caesarian birth trauma during infancy and childhood,
Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 15, 3, 77+.
Fenech, G. and Thomson, G. (2014). Tormented from ghosts from their past’: A meta-
synthesis to explore the psychosocial implications of a traumatic birth on maternal
well-being. Midwifery, 30, 2, 185-193.
Fenwick, S., Holloway, J. and Alexander, J. (2009). Achieving normality: the key to
status passage to motherhood after a caesarean section. Midwifery, 25, 5, 554-563.
32
Fox, B. and Worts, D. Revisiting the critique of medicalised childbirth: a contribution
to the sociology of birth. Gender and Society, 13, 3, 326-346.
Gamble, J. and Creedy, D. (2005). Psychological trauma symptoms of operative birth.
British Journal of Midwifery, 13, 4, 218-224.
Gould, D. (2000). 'Normal labour: a concept analysis'. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 31, 2, 418-27.
Hammersley, M. (2000). Taking sides in qualitative research: essays on partisanship
and bias. London. Routledge.
Herishanu-Gilutz, S., Schattner, E. and Kofman, O. (2009). On becoming a first time
mother after an emergency caesarean section. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 7,
967-981.
Hunter, B., Berg, M., Lundgren, I., Olafsdottir, A. and Kirkham, M. (2008).
Relationships: the hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care. Midwifery, 24, 2,
132-137.
Holloway, S. (1998). Local childcare cultures: Moral geographies of mothering and
the social organization of pre-school education. Gender, Place and Culture, 5, 1, 29-
53.
33
Illich, I. (1976/1995). Limits to Medicine (Medical Nemesis: the Expropriation of
Health. London. Marion Boyars.
Kehily, MJ. (2014). Methods and mothers: a review of research methods for
understanding motherhood as a changing identity Birthing and Motherhood Seminar
Series. Open University Camden, 29th January 2014.
Kvale, S. (1996). Qualitative InterViews: an Introduction to Qualitative Research
Interviewing. London. Sage.
Lyberg, A. & Severinsson, E. (2010). Fear of Childbirth: mother’s experiences of
team-midwifery care – a follow-up study. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 4,
383-390.
Lomas, P. (1966). Ritualistic elements in the management of childbirth. British
Journal of Medical Psychology, 39, 3, 207-213.
Martin, A. (2001) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction.
Beacon Press. Boston.
McConville, B. (2014). Respectful Maternity Care: how the UK is Learning from the
Developing World. Midwifery, 30, 154-7.
Mercier, J., Brannigan, C. and Green-Jervis, C. (2012). The legacy of a self-reported
negative birth experience. British Journal of Midwifery, 20, 10, 717-22.
34
Miller, T. (2005). Making Sense of Motherhood: A Narrative Approach. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press.
Oakley, A. (1980). Women confined: towards a sociology of childbirth. Martin
Robinson. Oxford.
Oakley, A. (1979/1986). From Here to Maternity. Harmondsworth. Penguin Books.
Odent, M. (1999). Is the participation of the father at birth dangerous? Midwifery
Today. http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/fatherpart.asp. Accessed 27th March
2014.
Pascali-Bonaro, D. and Kroeger, M. (2004). Continuous female Companionship
During Childbirth: A Crucial Resource in Times of Stress or Calm. Journal of
Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49, 4, 19-27.
Prochaska, E. and McGuinness, N. (2014). Researching respectful care in childbirth.
Birthing and Motherhood Seminar Series. Open University Camden, 29th January
2014.
Reiger, K. and Dempsey, R. (2006). Performing birth in a culture of fear: an
embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review, 15, 364-73.
Ribbens, J. (1998). 'Hearing my feeling voice? An Autobiographical Discussion of
Motherhood' in Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative
Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. London. Sage. 24-38.
35
Rossi, A.S. (1977). A biological perspective on parenting. Daedalus, 106, 2, 1-31.
Rothman, B.K. (2014). Pregnancy, birth and risk: an introduction. Health, Risk and
Society, 16, 1, 1-6.
Scamell, M. and Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of
risk: Midwifery practice and the ever narrowing window of normality during
childbirth. Health, Risk and Society, 14, 2, 207-221.
Simkin, P. (1991). Just Another Day in a Woman’s Life? Women’s Long-Term
Perceptions of Their First Birth Experience. Part 1. Birth, 18, 4, 203-210
Simkin, P. (1992). Just Another Day in a Woman’s Life? Part II: Nature and
Consistency of Women’s Long-Term Memories of Their First Birth Experiences.
Birth, 19, 2, 64-81.
Simkin, P. (2006). What makes a good birth and why does it matter? International
Journal of Childbirth Education, 21, 3, 2-4.
Stadlen, N. (2007). What mothers do, especially when it looks like nothing. New
York. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Stadimayr, W., Amsler, F., Lemola, S., Stein, S., Alt, M., Burgin, D., Surbek, D. and
Bitzer, J. (2006). Memory of childbirth in the second year: The long term effect of a
36
negative birth experience and its modulation by the perceived intranatal relationship
with caregivers. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27, 4, 211-224.
Steen, M., Jones, A., and Woodworth, B. (2013). Anxiety, bonding and attachment
during pregnancy, the transition to parenthood and psychotherapy. British Journal of
Midwifery, 21, 12, 844-50.
Talbot, D. (2013a). The medicalisation of childbirth: emotion, care, coping. Research
report. http://www.parentingandtheurbanexperience.co.uk/the-medicalisation-of-
childbirth-emotion-care-coping/. Accessed 27th March 2014.
Talbot, Deborah (2013b). Early parenting and the urban experience: risk, community,
play and embodiment in an East London neighbourhood. Children's Geographies, 11,
2, 230–242.
Talbot, D. (2014). Exploring the relationship between birth experiences and early
motherhood. Birthing and Motherhood Seminar Series. Open University Camden,
29th January 2014.
Teijlingen van, E. (2005). A Critical Analysis of the Medical Model as used in the
Study of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Sociological Research Online, 10, 2,
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/teijlingen.html.
Thomson, R., Kehily, MJ., Hadfield, L. and Sharpe, S. (2011). Making Modern
Mothers. Bristol. Policy Press.
37
Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., Rubertsson, C. and Radestad, I. (2004). A Negative
Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample. Birth, 31, 1, 17-
27.
Wolf, N. (2001). Misconceptions: truth, lies, and the unexpected journey to
motherhood. New York. Anchor Books.
Zadoroznyj, M. (1999). Social class, social selves and social control in childbirth.
Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 3, 267-89.
Top Related