1
Cyclostationarity of Acoustic Emissions (AE) for monitoring bearing defects
B. KILUNDU a, X. CHIEMENTINb,1, J. DUEZa, D. MBAc
aUniversity of Mons - UMONS, Risks Research Centre, 20 Place du Parc, 7000 Mons, Belgium
bGRESPI, Groupe de Recherche En Sciences Pour l'Ingénieur, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la
Housse, 51687 Reims Cedex 2, France.
cTurbomachinery group, School of Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Cyclostationnarity is a relatively new technique that offers diagnostic advantages for analysis of vibrations from
defective bearings. Similarly the Acoustic Emission (AE) technology has emerged as a viable tool for preventive
maintenance of rotating machines. This paper presents an experimental study that characterizes the
cyclostationary aspect of Acoustic Emission signals recorded from a defective bearing. The cyclic spectral
correlation, a property associated with cyclostationarity, was compared with a traditional technique, the envelope
spectrum. This comparison showed that the cyclic spectral correlation was most efficient for small defect
identification on outer race defects though the success was not mirrored on inner race defects. An indicator,
based to this statistical property, has been also proposed. It is concluded that its offers better sensitivity to the
continuous monitoring of defects compared to the use of traditional temporal indicators (RMS, Kurtosis, Crest
Factor).
Keywords
Acoustic Emission, Cyclostationarity, follow-up, rolling bearing.
1 Corresponding author : [email protected]
2
1 Introduction
Over the last 20 last years the Acoustic Emission (AE) has been proven as a powerful method for the detection
of incipient defects on rotating machines [1]. The technology offers several significant advantages over
conventional vibration analysis [1]. Acoustic Emission (AE) results from rapid release of strain energy which
causes transient elastic waves in a solid material [2]. In particular for bearing monitoring, AE results from micro-
shocks and friction between the rotating elements of the bearing. AE differs from vibration analysis as the
frequency band used for AE is between 100kHz to 1000kHz.
AE offers earlier detection than vibratory analysis for outer race defects [1] though this is not mirrored for inner
race defects. Some studies used the principle of AE to identifiy bearing defects over a wide range of operating
speeds. McFadden [3] showed the effectiveness of AE in detecting small defects at low speeds (10rpm) whilst
Roger [4] applied AE to monitor offshore cranes. For small defects, Tandon [5] has demonstrated the usefulness
of parameters associated with AE, such as peak amplitude or counts, especially the ringdown counts. Bansal [6]
and Choudhury [7] also exploited traditional AE analysis techniques for fault diagnosis, presenting results of AE
events and maximum amplitude (peak amplitude), or, AE events and ringdown counts.
Another advantage offered by AE is the fact that it can be employed to quantify the bearing defect size in-situ.
Al-Ghamdi [8] and Mba [9] correlated the AE burst duration with the length and width of an outer race defect;
however, such a correlation was not demonstrated for inner race defects. In another study Al-Dossary [10]
investigated the influence of the shape of the defect (length and width) on both inner and outer races and
reaffirmed the findings of Al-Ghamdi et al. It should also be noted that the application of AE does have its
challenges [21].
Over the last decade, primarily due to developments in computer hardware and storage systems, techniques
suitable for the vibration are being applied to the AE. Liu [12] used the independent components analysis, Liao
[13] employed wavelets analysis while Žvokelj [14] and Li [15] were interested in the empirical mode
decomposition and Gabor transform, respectively, on AE signals. Chiementin [16] used time domain indicators
RMS, Kurtosis, and proposes to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by applying denoising techniques (wavelet,
spectral subtraction, sanc) on experimental acquired AE data. The use of traditional methods of vibration
analysis for AE analysis offers yet further techniques for the diagnostician. This paper firstly highlights the
cyclostationary character of AE’s associated with a defective bearing, and secondly, shows the effectiveness of
3
the spectral correlation for diagnosis. Lastly, a unique indicator for monitoring bearings based on clostationnarity
characteristics is presented.
2 Cyclostationarity and Acoustic Emission
Burst of acoustic emission during bearing operation are caused by the passage of the roller over the defective
race. The frequency of the AE burst will be associated with the defect location and is given by the following
expressions:
Outer race defect frequency:
− βcos12
=)Hz(PD
BDf
nBPFO r
(1)
Inner race defect frequency:
+ βcos12
=)Hz(PD
BDf
nBPFI r
(2)
Ball (roller) defect frequency:
−2
cos1=)Hz( βPD
BDf
BD
PDBDF r
(3)
where n is the number of balls or rollers, f is the relative rotational frequency between inner and outer races, BD
is the ball (roller) diameter, PD is the pitch diameter and β the contact angle.
Similarly to vibrations, AE signals from a damaged bearing will include periodicities associated with the defect
frequency. And, usually the signal is considered to be amplitude modulated. Hence, it can be expected that the
use of envelope analysis would highlight the bearing defect characteristics [17].
2.1 Cyclostationarity
By definition, a signal is cyclostationary if some of its statistics present periodicities. Each period or cycle can
be regarded as the realization of the same random process. Averaging can make it possible to extract the periodic
part of the signal. When the latter exists, the signal is said to be cyclostationary at an order ‘1’. Certain non-
4
periodic signals can present periodic energy, i.e., they become periodic when there are squared. Such a signal
presents hidden periodicities and is said to present second-order cyclostationarity. In general terms, a signal is
cyclostationary at an order ‘2’ if its statistical properties at order ‘2’ are periodic. The cyclostationarity property
which is a particular case of non-stationarity allows discovery of hidden periodicities within a signal. As rotating
machines intrinsically generate periodicities, one may find it beneficial to exploit cyclostationarity properties for
fault detection and diagnosis. In this section, we recall the main definitions and properties of a cyclostationary
process. The reader is refered to Antoni [18] for a full explanation and definition on cyclostationarity.
The construction of cyclostationarity concepts is essentially based on statistical moments. The latter are defined
as mathematical expectation. The n-th order moment of a signal x(t) is given by
{ })(=)( txEtm n
n (4)
Where E is the mathematical expectation. If this moment presents a periodicity T, the signal is said to be
cyclostationary at order n. Hence, one can write:
)(=)( Ttmtm nn +
(5)
An interesting quantity deduced from the concept of statistical moments is the autocorrelation. It is defined by
{ }/2)(/2)(=),( * τττ +− txtxEtRxx (6)
where x* denotes the conjugate of x. The autocorrelation function expresses the internal similarity of the signal
at two instants taken with a lag τ.
2.2 Cyclic autocorrelation
Now, let us define the cyclic moment αnm of signal )(tx as the Discrete Fourier Transform of its moment:
{ })(= / tmDFTm ntn α
α→ (7)
Where α is the cyclic frequency. Applied to the autocorrelation, this concept leads to the cyclic autocorrelation
as given by equation 8,
{ }),(=)( / ττα tRDFTR xxtx (8)
5
The cyclic autocorrelation depends on the lag τ and on the cyclic frequency α. It gives an indication of energy in
the signal due to cyclostationary components. At α=0 lies the stationary autocorrelation of the signal. If there
exists any value of α≠0 for which the cyclic correlation is non zero, then this indicates that the signal is
cyclostationary [19].
2.3 Spectral correlation
Computation of double Fourier Transform of autocorrelation along t and τ leads to the spectral correlation
density (SCD) of the signal. The SCD is given by
{ }),(=),( ,/ ταα τα tRDFTdfdfS xxftx →→
−+ )
2()
2(= * αα
fdXfdXE (9)
The spectral correlation is evaluated by extracting non zero values from SCD, and it will be noted )( fS xα .
Note that spectral correlation evaluated for α=0, gives the power spectral density (PSD) of the signal. Antoni
[20] established that the power of cyclostationary signals is distributed along spectral lines parallel to the f-axis
and positioned on the cyclic frequencies α=αi. In summary, the spectral correlation is continuous in the f-
frequency and discrete in the α-frequency.
For emphasizing correlation between components of weak energy compared to those of great energy, the concept
of spectral coherence, which is the normalized spectral correlation, may be employed. It is given by:
)2
()2
(
)(=)(
00 αα
αα
−+ fSfS
fSfC
xx
xx
(10)
Where f and α are, respectively, the spectral and cyclic frequencies.
6
2.4 Estimation of spectral correlation
The most common estimator of the spectral correlation function uses the averaged periodogram. The signal is
first segmented in K blocks by means of Hanning or Hamming window, with an overlap of 2/3 the window size
to prevent leakage. For a given cyclic frequency α, each block is multiplied by tie πα and tie πα− respectively.
Then, the inter-spectrum of the two signals deduced from a block is computed. This represents the cyclic
spectrum at the cyclic frequency α for the n -th block:
)
2().
2(=)( *
,
ααα −+ fXfXfS nx (11)
The estimator )(~
fSxα
of spectral correlation for a given α will be obtained by averaging inter-spectra for all
the K blocks. Hence, we have
)(
1=)(
~,
1=
fSK
fS nx
K
nx
αα ∑ (12)
3 Experimental study
3.1 The test rig
The test bearing was fitted on a rig that consists of a shaft driven by a motor as illustrated on figure 1. The shaft
is supported by two large slave bearings, Fig. 1.a. The test bearing is a split Cooper cylindrical roller type
01B40MEX, with a bore diameter of 40 mm, external diameter of 84 mm, pitch circle diameter of 68 mm, roller
diameter of 12 mm, and 10 rollers in total (Fig. 1.b). This bearing is selected due to its split design, which would
facilitate the assembling and disassembling of the bearing on the shaft after each test. The AE acquisition system
consists of a piezoelectric type sensor (Physical Acoustic Corporation type WD) fitted onto the top half of the
bearing housing. The transducer has an operating frequency of 100-1000 kHz. The signal from the transducer is
amplified at 40 dB and sampled at 8 MHz. The rotation speed is 1500 rpm for all signals. The bearing
characteristic frequencies at this rotational speed are respectively 147 Hz and 103 Hz for the inner race defect
and outer race defect.
7
Two split Cooper bearings are used for the experiment in order to seed a variety of defects on each bearing. To
evaluate the temporal indicators largely used in vibratory analysis, the growth of the defect is simulated on outer
ring and inner ring. An isolated defect is simulated which is artificially increased in size. The defect grows in the
direction of the length of the track (L) then in the direction of the width of the track (W). All defects are grouped
in table 1. The load is set at 5.3 kN.
3.2 Spectral correlation and envelope analysis
It has been established that compared to bearing vibration monitoring, AE has the ability to detect the growth of
subsurface cracks whereas the former can detect defects only when they appear on the surface [21].
Consequently, AE offers the possibility to detect incipient bearing damage if judicious signal processing is
implemented. In this section, we compare envelope analysis and spectral correlation on AE signals for bearing
defect detection.
Figures 2 and 3 represent the time waveform and the envelope spectrum relative to the smallest defect size OD1
on the outer race, one can note the absence of bursts in the waveform and the absence of the BPFO (103 Hz) in
the envelope spectrum. This indicates the difficulty in detecting incipient fault by envelope analysis, however,
the spectral correlation identified the presence of such a defect, see figure 4. Envelope analysis involved
demodulating within the 50kHz-300 kHz frequency band.
Envelope analysis proved to be effective only when the size of defect became larger. The case of OD7 shows
the presence of bursts in the time waveform (Fig.5) and that of a peak at 125 Hz in the envelop spectrum, which
can is attributed to the BPFO, see figure 6. It must be stated that a frequency spectrum of the AE waveform
offers no diagnostic information, see figure 7.
Figure 8 highlights the spectral correlation for OD7 clearly showing the manifestation of BPFO and its second
harmonic. The level of energy of the spectral correlation is, in this case, definitely larger than that of defect OD1.
This shows its sensitivity to the outer race defect evolution. However, the envelope spectrum and the spectral
correlation do not reveal the peak of BPFI at 147 Hz, figures 9, 10.
These observations have shown AE signal from bearing are cyclostationary. The application of spectral
correlation gave better results than envelope analysis. However, it must be mentioned here that spectral
8
correlation of AE is not effective for inner race defects, nor was traditional enveloping. This is attributed to the
arduous transmission path too significant propagation path between the inner race defect and the receiving
sensor.
3.3 The" Integrated Spectral Correlation" indicator : ICS
In order to track the defect evolution, we defined an indicator that evaluates energy at α at the defect frequency
fdef from the spectral correlation. As spectral correlation is discrete along α-axis, the defect frequency does not
necessarily belong to the set of α values. Hence, the health indicator, the Integrated Spectral Correlation noted
ICS is computed by integrating the spectral correlation between α1,2≈ fdef±1 along α-axis, and for all the values
along f-axis.
dfSICS x
sf
αα
αα∫∑ 2
0
2
1=
=
(13)
3.3.1 Analysis of the outer race defect
Applied to this study, the ICS indicator increased with increasing outer ring defect size as illustrated in figure
11.
Compared to time domain indicators (RMS, Kurtosis and Crest Factor), the ICS indicator presents a good
correlation with the increasing outer race defect. Kurtosis values and Crest Factors computed for both the
envelope signals and the raw signals did not show increasing values with increasing defect size though the RMS
value of the raw signal showed close similarity with the ICS indicator (Fig. 12 and 13). The table 2 shows that
the ICS indicator offered the best correlation between its increasing value and the increasing defect size.
Interestingly, as with other indicators, the ICS indicator was affected by changes in the length of the defect
(OD6�OD9) (Fig. 12 and 13).
9
3.3.2 Analysis of the inner race defect
Contrary to the outer race defect, the ICS indicator computed from AE signals associated with the inner race
defect did not increase with the increasing of defect size (Fig. 14). The same observation was noted for other
indicators, see figure 15 and table 3. As explained earlier this was not surprising.
4 Conclusion
.This paper highlights the cyclostationary character of Acoustic Emission from bearings; it showed also the
effectiveness of the spectral correlation and the ICS indicator for monitoring bearing defects. The use of this
statistical property showed improved detection and diagnosis of defects vis-a-vis the traditional envelope
spectrum. Furthermore, the increased sensitivity of the developed indicator, ICS, over traditional indicators
(RMS, Kurtosis, and Crest Factor) was demonstrated. The use of the cyclostationarity offers an undeniable
advantage for applications of AE. However this effectiveness is valid only within the framework of an outer race
defect. Indeed, the inner race defect remains a delicate subject especially when the defect is small.
5 References
[1] D. Mba, R.B.K.N Rao, Development of acoustic emission technology for condition monitoring and
diagnosis of rotating machines: Bearings, pumps, gearboxes, engines, and rotating structures, Shock and
Vibration Digest, 38(2), (2006), 3-16.
[2] J.R. Mathews, Acoustic Emission, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc., New York ISSN 0730-
7152, 1983.
[3] P.D. McFadden, J.D. Smith, Acoustic emission transducers for the vibration monitoring of bearings at low
speeds, Cambridge University, Engineering Department, (Technical Report) CUED/C-Mech, 1983.
[4] L.M. Rogers, The application of vibration signature analysis and acoustic emission source location to on-
line condition monitoring of anti-friction bearings, Tribology International, 12(2), (1979), 51-59.
[5] N. Tandon, B.C. Nakra, The application of the sound-intensity technique to defect detection in rolling-
element bearings, Applied Acoustics, 29(3), (1990), 207-217.
[6] V. Bansal, B.C. Gupta, A. Prakash, V.A. Eshwar, Quality inspection of rolling element bearing using
acousic emission technique, Journal of Acoustic Emission, 9(2), (1990), 142-146,.
10
[7] A. Choudhury, N. Tandon, Application of acoustic emission technique for the detection of defects in rolling
element bearings, Tribology International, (2003), 39–45.
[8] A.M. Al-Ghamdi, P. Cole, R. Such, D. Mba, Estimation of bearing defect size with acoustic emission,
Insight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 46(12), (2004), 758-761.
[9] D. Mba, The use of acoustic emission for estimation of bearing defect size, Journal of Failure Analysis and
Prevention, 8(2), (2008), 188-192.
[10] S. Al-Dossary, R.I.R. Hamzah, D. Mba, Observations of changes in acoustic emission waveform for
varying seeded defect sizes in a rolling element bearing, Journal of Applied Acoustics, 70(1), (2009), 58–
81.
[11] J.Z. Sikorska, D. Mba, Truth, Lies, Acoustic Emission and process machines, Journal of Mechanical
Process Engineering, Part E, IMechE, 222(1), (2008), 1-19.
[12] G.-H. Liu, P.-J. Huang, X. Gong, J. Gu, Z.-K. Zhou, Feature extraction of acoustic emission signals based
on fractal dimension and independent component analysis Journal of South China University of
Technology (Natural Science), 36 (1), (2008), 76-80.
[13] C. Liao, X. Li, D. Liu, Application of reassigned wavelet scalogram in feature extraction based on acoustic
emission signal, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 45(2), (2009), 273-279.
[14] M. Žvokelj, S. Zupan, I. Prebil, Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of large-size low-speed bearings
using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition method combined with Principal Component Analysis,
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing , (24)4, (2010), 1049-1067 .
[15] X.-J. Li, C.-J. Liao, X.-L. Luo, Application of gabor transform in feature extraction of acoustic emission
signal, Jiliang Xuebao/Acta Metrologica Sinica, 30(3), (2009), 234-239.
[16] X. Chiementin, D. Mba, B. Charnley, S. Lignon, J.-P. Dron, Effect of the denoising on Acoustic Emission
signals, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, In press, (2009).
[17] C. James Li, S. Li, Acoustic emission analysis for bearing condition monitoring, Wear, 185, (1995) 67-74.
[18] J. Antoni, Cyclostationarity by examples, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23, (2009) 987-
1036.
[19] A.C. McCormick, A.K. Nandi, Cyclostationarity in rotating machine vibrations, Mechanical Systems and
Signal Processing, 12(2), (1998), 225-242.
11
[20] J. Antoni, Cyclic spectral analysis in practice, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21 (2007) 597-
630.
[21] N. Tandon, A. Choudhury, A review of vibration and acoustic measurement methods for the detection of
defect in rolling element bearings, Tribology international, 32, (1999), 469-480.
23
Figure 12: ICS indicator, RMS, Kurtosis, Crest Factor vs outer race defect size. Comparison of normalized
values from the envelope signals
24
Figure 13: ICS indicator, RMS, Kurtosis, Crest Factor vs outer race defect size. Comparison of normalized
values from the raw signals
26
Figure 15: ICS indicator, RMS, Kurtosis, Crest Factor vs inner race defect size. Comparison of normalized
values from the envelope and the raw signals
27
Table 1: Incremental defect size for outer ring (OD) and inner ring (ID)
Designation (LxW) mm Designation (LxW) mm OD1 Circle D = 0.5 mm ID1 Circle D = 0.5 mm
OD2 0.9x2.5 ID2 3x1
OD3 0.9x4 ID3 6x1
OD4 0.9x8 ID4 12x1
OD5 0.9x12 ID5 12x3
OD6 3x12 ID6 12x6
OD7 5x12
OD8 7x12
OD9 9x12
28
Tableau 2: Estimation of the effectiveness of indicators to monitor the evolution of defects for OD. The score is
calculated by comparing the evolution of the indicator and the evolution of the size of the defect. (+1 if the evolution is
identical, -1 if not, 0 if constant)
Envelope Original
Indicator ICS RMS Kurtosis Crest
Factor RMS Kurtosis
Crest
Factor
Score (/9) 5 3 1 1 3 2 1
29
Tableau 3: Estimation of the effectiveness of indicators to monitor the evolution of defects for ID. The score is
calculated by comparing the evolution of the indicator and the evolution of the size of the defect. (+1 if the evolution is
identical, -1 if not, 0 if constant)
Envelope Original
Indicator ICS RMS Kurtosis Crest
Factor RMS Kurtosis
Crest
Factor
Score (/5) 0 0 1 1 0 0 -1