Download - Barriers to Communication: Improving Cultural Awareness with Latino Patients A program proposal submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University in partial fulfillment of

Transcript

Barriers to Communication: Improving Cultural Awareness withLatino Patients

A program proposal submitted to the faculty ofSan Francisco State Universityin partial fulfillment of the

requirements forthe degree

Master of Sciencein

Nursing

byMarcos Taquechel, RN

i

San Francisco, CA

December 2010

CETIFICATE OF APPROVAL

I certify that I have read Barriers to communication: improving cultural awareness with Latino patients by Marcos Taquechel, and that in my opinion, this meets the criteria for approving the field study submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master’s of Science in Nursing at San Francisco State University

ii

ii

_________________________________________

Dr. Pamela Baj , DNSc, RN, FAANProfessor of Nursing

_________________________________________

Dr. Harvey “Skip” Davis, RN, PhDAssociate Professor

BARRIERS TO COMMUNICATION: IMPROVING CULTURAL COMMUNICATION AWARENESS WITH LATINO PATIENTS

Marcos TaquechelSan Francisco State University

2010Abstract

Latinos are the fastest growing ethnic population in the United

States. The steady increase in this population segment poses

special communication problems between health care professionals

and Latino patients. Although many health care professionals are

aware of the cultural barriers Latinos encounter, some still lack

cultural competency. The implementation of online courses offered

to health care professionals can help bridge the cultural gap by

introducing an insider’s view on how Latinos perceive and react

iii

iii

to health care in the United States. The purpose of this field

study is to introduce new teaching methodology through employing

latest cultural research. New technology and the online format

may improve the level of cultural competency of health care

professionals treating Latino patients in the clinical setting.

The theoretical framework for this field study was based on the

theory of culture care diversity and universality by Madelaine Leininger’s

which incorporate broad humanist dimensions about people in their

cultural life context, and focuses on identifying values,

beliefs, life-ways, and symbolic referents related to culture

care phenomena. This concept was then applied to web-learning

design using videos and narration with pictures illustrating real

clinical scenarios. An evaluation component is planned to

determine outcome for this field study. Further research is

recommended based on the literature review to evaluate effective

teaching methodology and relevant development of cultural

competency programs.

Dr. Pamela Baj , DNSc, RN, FAAN Date

iv

iv

Professor of Nursing TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter One: Introduction .................................... 1Description of this program proposal.................3Purpose of the study.................................5Significance of the study............................7Objectives...........................................8Assumptions..........................................9Summary.............................................10

Chapter Two: Review of literature ............................ 12Cultural Competency in Nursing......................14Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Health Care.....30Race and Ethnicity and Satisfaction with Health Care34Theoretical Framework...............................36

Chapter Three: ....................................Implementation 40

Introduction........................................40Evidence............................................42Program objectives..................................45Population, Setting, and Stakeholders...............47Implementation of plan..............................49Resource allocation and costs.......................52............................................................................................................Summary.............................................53

Chapter Four: Evaluation.......................................56Introduction........................................56Stakeholders........................................57Evaluation design...................................58Gathering Credible Evidence.........................60Justifying Conclusions..............................61Ensuring use and Sharing Lessons Learned............62Time Frame for Evaluation...........................63

v

v

Summary.............................................64Chapter Five: Conclusion.......................................65

Introduction........................................65Implications........................................65Limitations of the field study......................66Recommendations.....................................67Summary.............................................69

References ..................................................70Appendices ..................................................81

vi

vi

vii

vii

Chapter 1

Introduction

The United States (U.S.) is the sum of many ethnic groups

adding different languages and cultures to form a tapestry rich

in diversity. However, cultural diversity brings challenges to

health care professionals who need to expedite specific

instructions and make assessments with limited time availability.

As a minority group, Latinos are the fastest growing ethnic

population in the U.S. (Shaya & Gbarayor, 2006). Latinos

encounter difficulty obtaining health care due to low

socioeconomic status, language and cultural barriers as they have

difficulties understanding the American mainstream health care

system (Ku & Flores, 2005). Lack of access and lack of insurance

add to this problem, compromising Latino patient satisfaction in

hospitals and clinics (Shi & Stevens, 2005). Health care

providers (HCP) must be able to meet these challenges in order to

offer health and pharmaceutical needs for the fast emerging

Latino population.

1

The United States Census Bureau (USCB) projects that the

overall U.S. population will increase by 50%, from 263 million in

1995 to 394 million in 2050. The Hispanic population is on the

rise and represents the largest minority in the U. S. and will

comprise almost 25% of the U.S. inhabitants by 2050. Of all

nurses in the U. S., 82.3% are White Non-Hispanic and only 6.5%

speak Spanish (Board of Registered Nurses, 2008). Based on this

projected population data, it is safe to estimate that at some

point in their careers, most nurses will take care of Latino

patients, and their families especially in heavy Latino populated

areas such as California and the Southwest of the United States

(Rivers & Patino, 2006).

With limited amounts of time, non Spanish speaking nurses

and physicians rely on official translators over the phone or

family members to aid communication with their Latino patients.

According to new ratings, limited English proficient (LEP)

patients perceive quality care to be associated with HCP and

don’t think having an interpreter is a substitute for Cultural

Competency (CC) (Ngo-Metzger et al., 2007). Thousands of patients

may be facing cultural barriers every day because of their lack

2

of communication skills in another language or may be assisted by

inexperienced translators who might distort important medical

health conditions and interpretations (Ku & Flores, 2005). In

order to become culturally proficient, nurses will need to

acquire CC on their own or have their agencies provide means for

them to acquire it. The lack of CC and language skills have been

found to compromise patient care resulting in more medical

errors, lack of compliancy, longer hospital stays, and lower

patient satisfaction (Ngo-Metzger et al., 2007). Implementation

of CC could also help Latinos in treating chronic diseases. A

study focusing on Latino adults with chronic diseases found that

deficits in communication can lead to chronic diseases as health

care providers fail to catch illnesses which can progress to

chronic conditions (Bachman, Tobias, Master, Scovron, & Tierney,

2008).

Obesity is a major cause of morbidity and disability (Wee et

al., 2005). Obesity is the second-leading cause of preventable

death in the United States. A significant percentage of Americans

have weight problems: estimates show that 64% are overweight and

30% obese (Wee et al., 2005). The estimated annual cost of

3

treating obesity related illnesses in the U.S. reached $ 147

billion in 2009 (Dentzer, 2010). Fifty one percent of Mexican-

American women 40–59 years of age were obese compared with about

39% of non-Hispanic white women of the same age (Centers for

Disease Control, 2007). Demographic factors influence projections

of future health care costs given that current increases in

obesity disproportionately affect women, Hispanics and Blacks

(Wee et al., 2005). Obesity leads to diabetes type II, which can

cause complications such as heart disease, hyperglycemic crises,

end-stage renal disease, lower extremity conditions and visual

impairment (Wee et al., 2005).

Hispanic/Latino Americans are at a particularly high risk

for type II diabetes and its complications. The Latino population

has an 11.7% rate of type II diabetes to 4.8% of non-Latino; this

represents a diabetes risk increase of 100%. Despite the diabetes

predominance, diabetes-related healthcare services such as annual

dilated eye examinations, glycosylated hemoglobin tests, self-

monitoring blood glucose meters, doctor visits for diabetes, foot

examinations, and attendance at diabetes self-management classes

are all lower for Latinos than among non-Latino whites (Centers

4

for Disease Control, 2007). Latinos also have higher rates for

major diabetes risk factors due to being overweight and being

physically inactive (Escamilla & Putnik, 2007). These are a few

examples of disease that affect Latinos and are of importance to

this project.

Development and implementation of CC courses in hospital and

clinics are a good approach to raise cultural competency levels

among health care professionals. The curriculum for such teaching

programs should focus on evidence-based health disparities among

Latino populations. It should provide culturally competent care

education and exposure to health cultural traits in Latin

countries. Health care providers who engage in CC learning should

increase cultural awareness and cultural sensitivity thereby

increasing efficiency communicating, teaching and preventing

diabetes and obesity in low English proficient (LEP) patients

(Shaya & Gbarayor, 2006).

Description of the program

This field study is primarily dedicated to the evaluation of

cultural competency programs and the investigation of the current

5

status of Latinos and their cultural barriers to health care.

This study and its final objective will have 3 phases of

development. The first is a literature search of evidence base

studies regarding Latinos and health care. This first part is

intended to familiarize the target population with Latino

culture, habits, common health conditions and how Latinos

perceive the health care world. The second part will focus on

several aspects of clinical care and the identification of useful

cultural elements which promote better communication between

Latino patient and HCP. A web-site will be created containing

cases, common words, and scenarios encountered in clinics and

hospitals. Health care workers can use this web-site as a guide

and begin to practice their cultural competency skills. The third

and final part of the program will focus on the implementation

and use of this web-site in several educational applications.

A web site as a distribution vehicle is preferable for its

ease of access and user interactive potential. Also the Internet

and its widespread availability is an affordable and efficient

way to deliver information, offering almost unlimited

possibilities of content delivery. Videos, text, sound and

6

interactive animation can be conveniently accessed from personal

or agency computers or from hand held devices. The Internet is

also rapidly becoming the most trusted information vehicle where

the HCP obtain medical related information (Hesse et al., 2005).

Web based media can also be useful for data collection, test

taking, data input management, and it can be connected virtually

anywhere. This web site is designed to help promote better

communication as well as the identification of specific cultural

communications patterns related to Latino and health care. At the

end of the course, an optional questionnaire or test will be

administered to participating HCP who are supposed to achieve at

≥ 80% correct answers.

The target population for this field study will be mostly

non-Latino HCP working in hospitals and clinics in Northern

California who are often in charge of Latino patients. According

to the United States Census Bureau, Latinos in California account

for 37% of the population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008). HCP mostly

likely to benefit from this CC program are nurses who have

limited or no experience with the Latino population or have moved

7

from areas of the country where the Latino patient population is

small.

One agency in Northern California has been chosen for its

large Latino population and also because it hosted similar CC

programs in the past. This project will be implemented as part of

the training program for new nurse graduates or as part of the

ongoing staff training. Other forms of implementation will take

place as the program is inserted and authorized by nursing

agencies which want to enable CC programs or use it as continuing

education credits for nurses’ license renewal.

Purpose to the study

The purpose of this field study is to improve satisfaction

among Latino patient population seeking health care service in

the United States by the creation of tools to that will promote

cultural understanding related to health care issues among HCP.

The expectations are that incremental improvements in HCP ability

to communicate with a culturally diverse group will generate

better patient satisfaction and safer nursing. Ultimately the

study seeks to promote a mutual cultural understanding between

Latino patient population and HCP producing verifiable benefits

8

in areas such as patient assessments, discharge instruction,

regular scheduled visits and medication instructions compliance

and understanding.

One immediate goal of this project is to first identify and

study the problem areas Latinos face when they seek health care,

and also the possible obstacles HCP face when treating Latino

patients. The research in these areas aim at understanding the

wide-range of perspectives, beliefs, values, and behaviors

concerning health and well being, Latinos bring with them to the

health care environment (Betancourt & Maina, 2007). These include

variations in identification of symptoms, thresholds for seeking

care and understanding of management strategies; also preferences

for being diagnosed or not and the choice for therapeutic

procedures and preventive measures and medication compliance (Ku

& Flores, 2005). A teaching methodology will then be created

utilizing the available research to be further incorporated into

teaching units assessed by a web site and also printed material.

A main goal of this project is the creation of a web site

incorporating the current research as well the teaching

9

methodology with the purpose of providing a comprehensive web

based education in CC regarding Latino culture. The creation and

implementation of a web site seek to accomplish current and

comprehensive learning as health disparities could be minimized

by several factors including the proper training of HCP to better

navigate cultural diverse patient populations (Kripalani, Jones,

Katz & Genao, 2006). In addition to the web site, another goal is

the creation of a booklet which will work as a companion book to

the web based learning course program.

The web site creation and availability offers only a

potential for learning but without correct implementation,

learning efficacy could be jeopardized by the lack of usage and

low penetration of target audience. Another goal of this project

is the implementation of the proposed web site as a training tool

to be used in hospitals by HCP and the establishment of this same

web program as part of nursing license renewal credit hours. This

goal translates into implementation efforts to bring this CC

course into health care institutions such as hospital and clinics

who are interested in starting CC education or already have CC

curricula in their establishments. This goal has also the

10

objective of utilizing the existent infra-structure of

established organizations to help bring this web site to its full

potential.

Significance of the study

The U.S. Hispanic population is growing at a rate four times

faster than the general population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008).

Hispanics have surpassed African Americans as the largest

minority group in the United States (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008).

The U.S. Census Bureau, 2008 also estimates that 13.8% or 41

million people in the U.S. will be of Hispanic/Latino descent by

the year 2010, growing to 16% or 51 million individuals by 2020.

This jump in population presents an exceptional challenge to

primary care providers who must communicate and provide care to a

patient population whose primary language and cultural background

is often not that of the caregivers. As the Latino population

grows, so grows the susceptibility for widespread health problems

associated with this increasing population segment. The increase

of cultural awareness among HCP could potentially address socio-

11

cultural disparities, increasing patient satisfaction and

improving health among all patients.

The adult Latino population reporting having diabetes is

more than 6% compared to 5.3% for the rest of the non Latino

population (Campos, 2007). In a study addressing cultural

barriers to successful use of insulin in Hispanics with type II,

diabetes was found to be metabolically more severe in Latinos

leading to more complications such as neuropathy, diabetic

retinopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and end stage renal

disease (Campos, 2007). Adding to this problem, Latinos have high

risk factors such as physical inactivity, obesity in woman and

high blood pressure. For most Latinos diabetes is considered a

high co morbidity factor (Lorig, Ritter & Jacquez, 2005). Since

diabetes is associated with education and patient provider

interaction, it is imperative that communication is safe and

effective (Campos, 2007).

Latino health problems have origins that can be traced back

to childhood years growing up in the United States. Because

Latinos are much more likely to be uninsured than non-Latinos and

82% of uninsured Latinos constitute families, children are the

12

most at risk group within the Latino community to suffer lack of

health care (Passel, 2009). Children make up more than 42% of

U.S. - born Latinos with no health coverage bringing serious

implications for Latino age development compromising healthy

development leading to possible illnesses in adulthood (Passel,

2009). Lack of insurance also aggravates economic troubles in the

Latino community. More than half of the adult illegal immigrants,

or 59%, had no health insurance during 2007, and had to withdraw

money from savings to pay for health care (Passel, 2009).

Economic hardship can also be a contributor to poor health care

as families scramble to make ends meet and cut corners utilizing

low quality foods and further delaying treatment of health

conditions. Another study demonstrate that a third of the

children of unauthorized immigrants and a fifth of adult

unauthorized immigrants live in poverty (Passel, 2009). The

economic disadvantages experienced by Latinos can further burden

the health care system in general as uninsured Latinos rush to

the emergency rooms seeking treatment for conditions which could

have been prevented with regular health care services (Okie,

2007). Attempts to address CC competency issues are significant

13

because they can help disenfranchised populations, facilitating

access and utilization of health care system.

Objectives of the study

(1) To increase cultural awareness of Latino health habits

among HCP. This will be measured by the ability health

care professionals have when identifying significant

symbols related to health and treatment important to

Latinos. They should be able to identify at least 80% of

listed important elements in post test questionnaires.

(2) The provision and completion of CC web based course by

HCP should increase patient satisfaction, medication

compliance, and decrease recidivism in the Latino patient

population in hospitals. Latino patients should be able

to interact with HCP demonstrating better understanding

of discharge instructions and seek regular treatments.

(3) To provide a web based resource center to HCP involving

aspects of Latino culture as it relates to health care.

Items should include but not be limited to, language

14

resources such as medical terminology in Spanish,

specific instructions on how to address Latinos with

limited English ability, Latino disease data base, Latino

disease risk, and an assortment of cultural material for

Latin studies. The effectiveness of this web resource

should be measured by the number of visits registered in

the site data base list. Is expected that this site will

have more than 100 visits a day, and online courses be

completed by at least five HCP per month.

Assumptions

The majority of research papers gathered for this project

indicated the existence of health disparities created by language

and communication barriers between the Latino patient community

and the HCP community. Addressing the causes of these disparities

in order to increase patient satisfaction among Latino patients

is a major assumption of this project. The existence of these

communication barriers is expected provided the groups being

studied are from different cultures. Another assumption is that

educational programs will also help to enhance HCP efficiency in

general by becoming more skilled in understanding and treating

15

other cultures, other than their own. Studies have shown that HCP

must be aware and willing to participate in the integration of

the Latino community by becoming knowledgeable of their culture

and customs (Betancourt et al., 2005). Other assumptions of this

study are that HCP will first develop a general interest in Latin

culture after embracing this CC course. This initial interest

will than provide the desire to become genuinely culturally

competent by absorbing and observing the Latino patient

population up close in the clinical setting as HCP have more

tools such as better cultural vocabulary. We can also estimate

that Latino patients should benefit from a favorable environment

where they feel more comfortable. This project assumes that

patients who feel more comfortable with their HCP will disclose

more information crucial to correct assessment and diagnosis as

trust in their HCP has a special and distinct meaning among

Latinos.

Summary

Bridging the cultural gap between Latino patients and HCP is

very important for safety and patient satisfaction (Ku & Flores,

2005). This program seeks to utilize the latest research in CC

16

and bring it to an online course creating an appealing learning

experience to HCP. With the projected increase in the Latino

population in the U.S. and the steady Latinos migration to the

U.S., acculturation tools which can be updated with current

information will be needed more frequently making the online

distribution a plus. Health disparities could be minimized by the

implementation of cultural education including the proper

training of health care professionals (HCP) to better navigate

cultural diverse patient populations (Kripalani, Jones, Katz &

Genao, 2006).

The creation of a CC tool can also promote patient

satisfaction by improving the level of trust Latinos have for

their HCP as they perceive being understood and their cultural

identity more respected. Finally, some immigrants reach the

United States borders unprepared and unexpectedly due to problems

they cannot control and do not have the luxury of a proper

acculturation such as prior English education. CC is important

because it promotes a cushion aiding cultural refugees who are in

need of health care and don’t know how to navigate the health

care system proficiently.

17

18

Chapter 2

Literature Review

To source available literature regarding communication

barriers in health care with the Latino population in the United

States (U.S.), a search was conducted using the following

electronic data bases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied

Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Journal of Nursing Education,

Google Scholar, and SpringerLink for articles published between

2005 and 2010. Search terms used to find relevant material in

these databases were “Latinos, health care, cultural barriers,

patient satisfaction, and Cultural Competency.” An initial search

was conducted using top hierarchy engines such as Google Scholar

and Elton B Stephens Company (EBSCO) information services which

returned a wealth of results. Each database individually yielded

different results. From all searches, 126 items were chosen; from

this first selection 66 were eliminated leaving 60. Of these, 39

were qualitative studies with varying degrees of quantitative

data supporting the research question, and 21 were mostly

quantitative and tended to be centered on specific areas of

health care such as heart attack and stroke awareness among U.S.

19

Hispanics. The criteria for choosing the most relevant research

article were, “uniqueness, data relevancy, size of study, and

reliability of sources.” Two meta-analysis studies were chosen

for review. To support the theoretical framework of this study,

two studies using Madeleine Leininger’s educational theories were

selected. Finally, 10 items were chosen for this literature

review based on their degree of relevancy, and how closely it

mirrored this field study.

Other methods used to obtain literature were contacting

authors through e-mail. Dr Chevannes, an author from the United

Kingdom was contacted in regards to relevant articles similar to

his educational paper, Issues in Educating Health Professionals to Meet Diverse

Needs of Patients and Other Service Users from Ethnic Minority Groups (Chevannes,

2001).

Other relevant literature was obtained throughout contacts

made with professionals working with the Latino community in the

Bay Area. Contacts and interviews with nonprofit organizations,

as well as clinics and hospitals serving Latinos produced

additional relevant literature. The book, Nursing an Hispanic Patient

(Homestead Schools, Inc, 2004), became a vital resource for this

20

study because it is part of a full credited course offered by a

school located in Torrance, California. The objective of this

course is to teach nurses how to work with Latino patients. It

contains a wealth of information about Latino culture, health

care and items relevant to better understand Latino patients and

their cultural identity and useful for this field study.

The articles reviewed here are organized into three

different headings: the first heading Cultural Competency in Nursing

contain seven articles regarding cultural and linguistic

competency, among these, Current Approaches to Integrating Elements of

Cultural Competence in Nursing Education (Lipson & Desantis, 2007) is a

report review, The Evidence Base for Cultural and Linguistic Competency on

Health Care (Goode, Dunne, & Bronheim, 2006) is a longitudinal

meta-analysis. Remaining under this heading, Effects of Limited English

Proficiency and Physician Language on Health Care Comprehension (Wilson, Chen,

Grumbach, Wang, & Fernandez, 2005) and Listening to Patients: Culture and

Linguistic Barriers to Health Care Access (Barr & Wanat, 2005) are articles

relevant to cultural and linguistic barriers effects on Latino

minority population. Caring for the Underserved (Cox et al., 2006),

Community-Based Strategies to Improve the Health of Mexican American Men

21

(Sobralske, 2006), and Teaching Methods and an Outcome Tool for Measuring

Cultural Sensitivity in Undergraduate Nursing Students (Hughes, & Hood, 2007)

are relevant studies in teaching strategies for CC affecting

Latinos. The second heading, Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Health Care

include, Perceived Discrimination and Self-Reported Quality of Care Among Latinos

in the United States (Perez, Sribney, Rodríguez, 2009), and Racial/Ethnic

Discrimination in Health Care: Impact on Perceived Quality of Care,( Sorkin,

Metzger & Alba, 2010). The third heading: Race and Ethnicity and

Satisfaction with Health Care includes: Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and

Satisfaction with Health Care (Haviland, Morales, Dial & Pincus, 2005),

and focus on patient satisfaction in the Latino community.

Cultural Competency in Nursing

Providing optimal health care to a growing numbers of

Hispanic Latinos offers a unique challenge for the health care

provider who has minimal foreign language skill and understanding

of Latino culture (Araiza, Ignacia & Kelley, 2005). The bulk of

reviewed articles for this field study focus on language

comprehension, cultural competence in health care, and cultural

teaching methodology designed to aid health care professionals

(HCP) in the care of Latino patients.

22

In the language comprehension study, Effects of Limited English

Proficiency and Physician Language on Health Care Comprehension Wilson, Chen,

Grumbach, Wang, and Fernandez (2005), hypothesized that patients

with limited English proficiency (LEP) might be affected by poor

health care treatments due to deficiencies in comprehension of

medical instructions. The goal was to investigate language

barriers with a linguistically diverse population-base sample and

evaluate the extent to which limited English proficiency impairs

medical comprehension. Another important goal of this study was

to evaluate levels of medical understanding by LEP patients when

treated by language concordant physicians versus language

discordant physicians. The variables investigated were a group of

LEP patients speaking 11 different languages, and English

proficient patients.

A state wide telephone survey of 1,200 Californians speaking

11 different languages was conducted. This survey contained four

items relative to medical comprehension. These included

understanding of medical situations, confusion about medication

use, trouble understanding labels, and bad reactions to

medications. Respondents were also asked if their physician spoke

23

their native language. A Likert-type scale method was used as

sampling and respondents were separated in two categories, one

group consisted of LEP persons and the other group was made of

English proficient individuals. Odds ratios and x2 analysis were

used to compare responses between LEP and English-proficient

respondents. Logistic regression models were used to isolate the

effect of language proficiency from that of age, sex, education,

insurance, income, years in the United States, ethnicity, and

having a regular source of care.

The researchers found that LEP respondents were

significantly more likely than their English proficient

counterparts to show problems understanding medical instructions.

Elderly, female, less educated, low income, uninsured and

resident in the United States for a short period of time

consisted of 49% of the 1,200 respondents. 57% of LEP, either

with language concordant or discordant physicians, reported

problems understanding medical instructions. Fewer English-

proficient respondents reported problems understanding medical

instructions and for these respondents, physician language had no

significant effect on comprehension.

24

This study included the large sample size including

respondents of 11 different languages, and the author’s choice of

U.S. Census type questions included in the questionnaire. This

study also uses statistical analysis and significance detailed by

many useful graphics displaying Pearson correlations

distinguishing groups and comparing all parameters. One

weaknesses of this study is to be confined to the state of

California limiting respondents sample and therefore may not

represent all LEP populations. Other limitations are that only

respondents who chose to answer questions in their own language

were selected, weakening results by excluding LEP population.

The relevancy of this study for this field study is based on

the findings regarding language comprehension and interpretation,

a core concern in the creation of CC programs such as the one in

this field study. This study is one of the first multilingual

studies which is population based and focus on the impact of

English proficiency and HCP comprehension. Data from the study is

useful for this field study because it validates the creation of

CC curricula aiding language concordance nursing staff; it also

25

substantiates and verifies the extent to which Latino patients

are affected by lacking culturally concordant health care.

The Evidence Base for Cultural and Linguistic Competency in Health Care

(2006), Goode, Dunne, and Bronheim conducted an 11 year

longitudinal review and analysis of evidence based studies which

impact cultural and linguistic competencies in health and mental

health, its outcomes and cost benefit for the overall healthcare

system. This study isolates and compares two variables. The first

concerns the increased satisfaction among patients and providers,

and well being of patients as a direct result of cultural and

linguistic competence; the second pertains to the cost and

benefits to the health care system.

To identify the evidence and gaps in research for cultural

and linguistic competence, two approaches were used. First a

structured research on Medline from January 1995 to March 2006

was conducted to identify primary research articles for review on

health outcomes and well-being. Second an investigative search of

several databases was performed to identify cost and benefit to

the system. Primary sources, selected reviews, technical reports,

and conceptual papers were chosen given their importance in

26

establishing a business case for cultural and linguistic

competence in relation to cost.

Articles reviewed in this study can be grouped into two

categories: the level of service delivery and organizational

policy level. Design methodology for reviewed articles was

presented in six bar graph charts and parameters were: (a) no

control, (b) no intervention control, (c) usual care control, (d)

usual care, (e) CC model, and (f) not CC model. The second part

of this analytic process looked for the evidence and a gap in

systems costs. To verify this, the authors created a table of

estimated costs for LEP services and compared the cost and

benefits.

This study major finding are a large volume of evidence

supporting linguistic competence as a critical component of

quality and effectiveness in relation to health outcomes for

minorities, and a majority of studies recognizing cultural and

linguistic competence as fundamental aspects of quality in health

care. This study accomplishes a substantial review and

classification of important studies in the subject and offers

significant analysis investigating the hypothesis that cultural

27

and linguistic competency are critical components of quality and

effective care in relation to health outcomes and well-being.

The study also hypothesizes that cultural and linguistic

competence results in decreased system costs is inconclusive and

makes further recommendations for a more robust research agenda

on cultural and linguistic competence in health care. The

findings of this study also conclude that cultural linguistics is

in its developmental stages.

The characteristics of this study lies in a large, extensive

and encompassing investigation that lasted 11 years contained in

a 46 page document. The first structured approached research

utilized a Medline search methodology yielding 365 studies that

addressed cultural and linguistic competence and health outcomes

but only 25 primary research studies met the criteria for final

review. The study also offers cost and benefits analysis

methodology of CC in health care.

The weaknesses of the study lie in the absence of a clear

final conclusion and the narrow scope of the current studies.

Studies do not consistently present conceptual framework, logic

model or definition for what constitutes CC. None of the

28

literature on system costs or business case described

methodological approach referencing patient, community, or key

stakeholder involvement. Other difficulties pointed out by the

authors are the complexity of methodology gathering data among

race and ethnicity which are viewed as being the same but cannot

be analyzed by the same principles.

This field study directly benefits from this extensive study

by helping it to develop a conceptual model of cultural and

linguistic competence for patients, their families, and

communities. This study enumerates a list of linguistic

competence policies which supports and mirrors this field study

purposes. The concept of a “cultural broker” emphasized here

promotes the education of HCP with the ability to tread two

cultures and facilitate understanding. Useful recommendations

includes: English proficiency issues, multilingual

telecommunication technologies, translations, cultural brokers,

teaching materials, and ethnic media languages other than

English.

In another qualitative study, Current Approaches to Integrating

Elements of Cultural Competence in Nursing Education the authors Lipson &

29

Desantis (2006), focus on existing CC programs by initially

describing, in brief, the two longest running CC programs in the

U.S. and then comparing landmark CC curricula. Five methods of CC

are described and analyzed in this study: specialty focus, required

courses, models, immersion experiences, and distance learning or simulation.

This study evaluates the efficacy of each method and compares

reports from institutions using those methods in their CC

courses. The study also focuses on factors that facilitate or

inhibit their intended results.

Lipson and Desantis (2006) demonstrate the type and models

of curricular format used in these institutions followed by a

detailed presentation of how they are implemented. The Purnell

Model for Cultural Competence, Giger and Davidhizar Transcultural

Assessment Model, and The Campinha-Bacote Process of Cultural

Competence are examined in detail by observation of results from

several types of data collection: from telephone calls and face

to face interview, e-mail correspondence and the participation of

active researchers in the field. The authors also provide a

comprehensive examination in their review and evaluate factors

which have positively or negatively affected these programs,

30

including community involvement, long distance learning and

simulation.

The authors found several outcome determinants related to

teaching cultural competence in schools of nursing. These factors

were evaluation, facilitators, and inhibitors. The study gathered evidence

provided from schools and teachers on the difficulty of

evaluation of efficacy of these cultural programs examined. The

facilitating and inhibiting factors were found to be associated

with the institutions and their support, as well as funding and

patient nurse relationships. These variables were then used to

correlate an institutions’ capacity to launch successful CC

curricula.

This qualitative study offers a complex and careful analysis

of each program producing clear distinctions among the different

courses. Parameters for evaluations of these programs included,

(a) increased student self awareness, cultural preconceptions,

beliefs, values and behavior affecting care, (b) enhanced ability

to deal with environmental and socio cultural factors affecting

the client (c) learning ability of students when negotiating

mutually satisfactory interventions with clients. Comparisons

31

were also made between immersion type courses where a student

participates in the community, with distance learning courses,

and where students learn from simulations. Even though this is

not an extensive study, its strength is being a unique and

somewhat rare study on existing CC methods and their results. Of

all articles in this literature review this was the only one

examining course evaluation and analysis on individual basis. The

courses are described and analysis of its methodology is made.

The utilization of graphics and a rich list of references, and an

extensive critique highlight the failures and successes of the

courses.

Lacking in this study are specific information about how

each program was conducted and implemented which could alter

final results and objectives; even though this is a qualitative

study, it could have been instrumental and useful to have

additional data in regards to how each program was implemented.

There is also a lack of definable target population. It is

difficult to determine the socio-demographics of nursing students

that participated in the cultural courses.

32

This article is of importance to this field study because it

helps to determine outcomes for each different choice of program

available, helping the creation and right implementation of CC

curricula which is the intention of this field study. The

methodology of each study brought forth in this study such:

“immersion experiences, distance learning, specialty focus,

models, and required focus”, demonstrate the options available in

some of these CC methods. The information contained in this study

is essential for the creation of new CC programs for HCP.

In the study Caring for the Underserved (Cox et al., 2006)

focusing on minorities and health care, a comparison is made

between two health care curricula formats designed specifically

to address the need of underserved communities. One format was

faculty-led; the other was web-based. The main purpose of this

study was the creation of curricula and its methods aimed at

improving the health of underserved communities such as Latino

immigrants, uninsured, socially isolated, substance addicted,

poorly educated and LEP. Evaluation of each curriculum, faculty-

led or web-based was performed by the comparison between changes

33

in attitude of students and their display of competence and

ability to translate content into behavior at the clinical

setting.

The settings for this study were six pediatric clerkship

rotations between 2003 and 2004 academic years, with the

participation of 100 third year medical students lead by a

coordinator into the existing six week pediatric clerkship study.

Students were assigned instructions either by the established

faculty-led or web-based methodology. Students were required to

complete the assigned course without having any other task of

caring for patients in order to isolate the curriculum providing

more accuracy. Results were than evaluated on basis of

understanding and displaying care for the underserved population

at hand.

A survey with a total possible score of 18 points was given

to all students participating in the three groups; the survey

consisted of eight 1 point multiple choice questions, one 5-point

question, and five 1 point questions about resources. Attitudinal

assessment and clinical skills were the main criteria of

evaluation. Attitudinal assessment, consisted of 26 items with

34

responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) on a

4-point Likert scale. Several methods of evaluation were created

for this study: Curriculum Development, Core Curriculum Elements, “I CARE”

Screening Tool, and Independent Clinical Project (ICP).

The findings suggested that both faculty-led curricula and

web-based learning are equally effective in improving learning

relevant to care of underserved population. Differences in

attitude and knowledge between web-based and faculty-led groups

were not significant. Compared to the established curricula, both

web-based and faculty lead demonstrated improvement, (p < .001)

for knowledge and (p < .05) for caring for the underserved. The

authors found that the web-based format could be as good and

effective as traditional face to face instruction for promoting

the caring of the underserved. Several reasons led to that

conclusion: among them, the attractiveness of the web-based

system in general; less demand on the instructor without

compromising learning; two hours less instructional time on

average was required and less traveling needed to get to classes.

The strengths of this study are the presence of screening

development of a tool for analysis of two different curricula by

35

medical students; one group with knowledge of underserved patient

and the other without knowledge creating an impact mechanism for

evaluation producing more clear result evidence. The allotted

time of one year and a program spanning at six hospital site

locations also offers a larger sample leading to more expected

accuracy in the results. Other strengths are the use of graphics

and charts to display analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), standard

deviation, and Fishers exact test assessment the program offered

in its charts.

The limitations in this study can be attributed to a small

number of subjects and sample population along with being in a

pediatric clinic which limits the study to that specific group

population and a certain age group. There were problems with

instructions of the “I CARE” tool were some of the students were

unable to recognize undeserved families or felt uncomfortable

inquiring about underserved issues. This might have impacted the

results of the established curriculum group which had a deficit

with I CARE use. Also the long term gains in this study are not

demonstrated since the study focused on evaluating students

36

short-term learning outcomes it cannot predict how gains would

translate into subsequent clinical practices.

The importance of this study is that it explores the use of

Web based learning potentials, which is the main objective of

this field study for a future for CC teaching curricula.

Examination of Web-based mechanisms must be well researched

before resources are used in its creation. This study could also

be instrumental in the writing of a future proposal and support

for web-learning development of CC curricula.

C. Sobralske (2006) in the investigative study, Community-

Based Strategies to Improve the Health of Mexican American Men seeks to

understand how much, and by what means cultural barriers and

values prevent Mexican American men from seeking health care in

the United States. This study looks at culture, masculinity and

acculturation factors affecting health in Mexican males.

Sobralske also highlights community-based programs strategies

aimed at improving the likelihood Mexican men will seek health

care. The participant groups were: (a) well informed and

accessible, (b) willing to participate in the interviews, (c)

were stable residents, (d) identify themselves as similar to

37

other Mexican American men in their community. This group was

than divided into two. One was able to provide or point out

health care-seeking behaviors of the primary group, and the other

did not. Participant observation was the investigative method for

this study seeking to understand the behavior, values, and

customs of a group of people. The difference between the primary

group and the secondary was that the secondary group contributes

to insights about health care seeking behaviors of the first

group. The primary group was not responsible for this action.

This technique was created mainly to confirm data gathered from

the first group and create cross reference data for evaluation by

the researcher. A total of 36 men were chosen for the study, and

eight were chosen as the primary group. Their average age was

47.5 years old.

The variables investigated were (a) level of acculturation,

(b) level of education, (c) age, (d) religious affiliation, (e)

occupation, (f) birthplace of participants and their parents, (g)

amount of time in the United States if born in Mexico, (h)

general living environment, kind of foods eaten, and clothes

worn. Level of acculturation verification was based on existing

38

acculturation rating scales which are well established in

research with Mexican Americans such as the Park model (Lanza,

Armbrister, Flórez & Aguirre, 2006). Analysis progressed from

lower to higher levels of abstraction, from collection of raw

data to identifying usual patterns to formulating major cultural

themes.

The major relevant findings for this field study are clearly

identified. How Mexican American males view health care and how

the influence of Latino masculinity influences their decision

when seeking health care are well tested and analyzed in several

paragraphs and demonstrated with graphics. The authors found that

Latino men do not seek health care until chronic diseases have

progressed far enough to produce bothersome symptoms. Delayed

decisions regarding of health treatment can be life threatening

and can shorten a man’s life. The inability of the Latino patient

to speak English well has been identified as a significant

barrier to health care assessment. Latinos can greatly benefit

from having “health brokers” to help navigate the allopathic

health care system and to assure greater adherence to recommended

health treatments (Sobralske, 2006).

39

The methodology of this study lies in the in-depth nature

and detail of the investigation of subjects and their families.

Subjects were interviewed in their place of choice to avoid

exterior influencing. Another unique quality of this study was

the participant observation method where the men were observed in

their community. Researchers were immersed in the community and

participated in community activities with friends, family and co-

workers leading to understanding of masculine identity. From

observing these interactions researchers were able to identify

emerging patterns blocking men’s health care activities.

This study has a limited number of participants, a non

specified time frame, and the confining of subjects to a small

geographical area northwest of the U.S. The exclusion of other

areas in the U.S. could create inconsistent results due to small

samples. Other problems are the lack of allopathic health care

system as a point of entry; instead it uses the folk healer

approach or the lay person in the community. This may be more

effective as a starting point in the investigation but does not

measure well how Latinos react in the traditional allopathic

health care system.

40

This study is significant for this field study because the

understanding of how Latinos think and react to health care is

fundamental for the creation of educational programs for training

nurses in CC, the intent of this field study. The data gathered

in this study becomes vitally important for the understanding of

cultural sensitivities of Latino families, in particular Latino

men, when seeking health care and can be directly applied to

instruction relevant to Latino man.

In the study, Listening to Patients: Cultural and Linguistic Barriers to

Health Care Access, Barr & Wanat (2005) attempt to identify barriers

to health care access encountered by cultural and linguistic

characteristics of ethnic low-income minorities. The study then

proceeds to investigate why some health care organizations (HCO)

have a tendency to impede access and others to facilitate access.

The study focuses on African American, Latino, Native American,

and Pacific Islander patients; for the purposes of this field

study, the focus of this review will be on Latino patients.

Increasing health care access has more implications than simply

having money to pay for care. Access also requires no

discrimination based on race or ethnicity and that services be

41

provided in a manner that is culturally and linguistically

appropriate (Barr & Wanat, 2005). Based on this assumption, the

study investigate minority patient’s perceptions on general

issues of culture and linguistic access to care such as: (a)

physicians, (b) non-physician staff, (c) HCO’s physical

environments, (d) different types of services provided by

physicians, and (e) different types of services provided by non-

physician staff.

The patient population selected for this research was

composed of low-income African American, Latino, Native

American/American Indian, and Pacific Islander community members

of the San Francisco Bay Area. A focus group format was used to

elicit information that assessed study participants through

various stages of their health care encounters. Forty one adults

were recruited to participate in an ethnically homogeneous focus

group composed of the four target groups. Patients were than

invited to participate in the focus groups responding to ads

posted in several HCO’s. Each participant was offered a small

cash stipend for their participation. With the Spanish speaking

segment the focus group was conducted in Spanish. The questions

42

directed at study participants focus on the specifics of what

might be said and done by HCO physicians and staff at different

stages of the patient-HCO encounters. Each focus group session

was videotaped, with an additional audiotape which was played

back to allow additional information and corrections to be made.

The methodology of this study utilizes focus groups as an

investigative tool. The presence of standard qualitative data

analysis procedures and the mapping of respondents’ experiences

and perceptions relating to characteristics of patient to HCO

encounters impeding or increasing its occurrence are also an

important component of the study. Two project team members

independently coded and analyzed samples of interview transcripts

for more reliability.

Even though it is believed the insights and perspectives

contained in this study suggest certain policy directions making

health care more accessible to minorities. This study has no

control design which could compromise reliable evaluation. Other

problems were that focus groups were not large enough to form a

representative sample. Finally since the participants of this

study obtained their health care from a variety of community-

43

based sources, the study cannot determine the extent to which

characteristics of the individual HCO affects participants.

The findings of this study reflect discrimination as being a

pervasive theme in the Latino community with their encounters

with HCO staff. These findings include discrimination on non-

Latinos against Latinos, discrimination by Latino staff who “feel

superior” to Latino patient, and discrimination by other minority

staff against Latino patients that don’t “look minority” (Barr &

Wanat, 2005). Major language barriers to accessing health care

were reported, including unavailable Spanish speaking staff and

incompetent translators. Latino participants also expressed

intolerance towards patients with limited English proficiency.

There are several important aspects in this study that are

relevant to this field study. It substantiates the need for

closer collaboration between health care organizations and ethnic

minority patients. Minority patients are more concerned with

communication problems with non-physician staff rather than

physician-patient relationship; another finding that low-income,

minority patients express preferences for unhurried, humanistic

health-care. These findings are important data which can be

44

instrumental in the designing of a curriculum focusing on nursing

education; it also aid in targeting a population for training.

Hughes & Hood (2007), in their educational related study,

Teaching Methods and an Outcome Tool for Measuring Cultural Sensitivity in

Undergraduate Nursing Students, illustrates one school of

multicultural curriculum for baccalaureate nursing students and a

tool to gauge changes in behavior called: Cross-Cultural

Interaction Scores (CIS) scale. The design of this study is

centered on the administration of transcultural learning courses

to baccalaureate nursing students. Two types of courses were

given. In level 1 course, students learned to deliver basic

nursing care to clients with alterations in health. Cultural

awareness was emphasized as important in all aspects of care.

Students performed cultural assessments and identified several

nursing diagnoses that may easily be misidentified because of a

nurse’s lack of knowledge related to client cultural practices.

In level 2 courses, the greatest amount of transcultural nursing

content is presented to the students. Curriculum involved caring

for adults, children, families, and clients with mental health

needs. Prior to beginning the cultural content in the second

45

course, a CIS evaluation is applied as a pretest to measure

attitudes and behaviors students have at this point. The tool

consists of 20 items and assesses behavior and attitude using a

five-point Likert-type scale.

The investigation of variables was performed using the CIS

tool. Tests were given to five different groups who participated

in the transcultural curricula; students were given a pretest and

a posttest before and after the administration of the course.

Variables were divided into four major themes for competency

analysis and the tool was subjected to factor analysis using

Principal Components Analysis. The four factors account for 51.9%

of the variance of the scores for the concept of cross-cultural

interaction. Factor 1 theme centered on sharing across cultures

with appreciation for individual perceptions and was 24.4% of

variance. Factor 2 major theme focused on acting with cultural

awareness and sensitivity and had a 13.1% of variance. Factor 3

theme was collaborating with persons from different cultures with

fairness and openness and was 8.1% of variance. Finally, Factor 4

major theme was the embracing of cultural diversity without

losing personal culture and had 6.0% of variance.

46

This study finds that though nurses have been taught to be

holistic according to previous studies, culturally relevant

nursing practice is almost nonexistent in many nursing schools.

In order for students to develop cultural competence, specific

knowledge and behaviors must be acquired in order to change

previously held attitudes, values, feelings, and beliefs about

persons from cultural backgrounds different from their own.

This study test students in a clinical setting before and

after the course has been administered and the CIS tool indicates

how well they make culturally sensitive choices which might

indicate reliability by direct comparison. Comparisons were made

between these two groups which clearly demonstrated an

improvement in cultural sensitivity. Higher scores indicate an

increased tendency to make culturally sensitive choices,

Cronbach’s alphas for the CIS range from .73 to .84. Significant

Cronbach’s alpha increases in student CIS scores were detected

after students engaged in the learning activities. Quantitative

measurements were high, but student comments about clinical

experience provided the depth and embodiment of cultural

sensitivity.

47

This study has several limitations. Important variables are

not included in the report such as age group, duration of courses

and number of participants. Other problems are that no population

target is presented. Minority patients who were the subjects of

this study are not clearly specified, and no information is given

about the type of clinical setting in which evaluations took

place. Even though the study points out an increase in cultural

sensitivity after the course implementation, reliability would be

more well-defined by a larger sample size and sample population

description data.

The finding of this study is of great relevancy for the

creation of CC curriculum, which is the objective of this field

study. This study mirror the final proposal of this field study

in several ways and its models for curriculum evaluation are

useful for CC programs. The three interrelated principles used in

this study, knowledge, development and use, mirror the objectives

of this field study’s end product. The nursing programs evaluated

in this study engage the idea of holism and adopt Leininger’s

cultural theory which is also the objective of this field study.

Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Health Care

48

The notion that disparities in health care are attributed to

racism or genetics still persists even though the problem is

known to be complex, involving socioeconomic status and cultural

and environmental factors (Shaya & Gbarayor, 2006). There is need

for more study to evaluate what are the specific causes and

reasons attributed to health care disparities within the Latino

population. Disparities may act in insidious ways permeating

health care and affecting quality of care. Therefore it is

essential to investigate the current status of discrimination

perception within the Latino population and health care for the

creation of programs aiming at improving patient satisfaction.

Despite the existence of several studies measuring the

effects of racial and ethnic discrimination, this subject remains

a relatively understudied area among the Latino population.

Perez, Sribney, and Rodriguez, (2009) in their study, Perceived

Discrimination and Self-Reported Quality of Care Among Latinos in the United States

examines the relationship of perceived discrimination and self-

reported quality of health care and health provider-patient

communication. In this study the authors examined the association

between perceived discrimination in two measures of quality of

49

care: patient reporting’s of quality of care and quality of

health care provider-patient communication.

Variables investigated in this study were the (a) Detroit

Area Study (DAS) consisting of a six-point item: sex, age,

foreign born, language of interview, education, and self reported

health status; and (b) a doctor or medical staff discrimination

measure from the Commonwealth Fund Health Quality Survey

consisting of three yes or no items: age, education, and

household income. This study examines the extent racial

differences in socio-economic status, social class and acute and

chronic indicators of perceived discrimination. Two outcomes were

researched. A five-point self-reported quality of health care

received in the past year, scored as 1 (excellent), 2 (very good), 3

(good), 4 ( fair), and 5 (poor). The second outcome measure was a

scale with five-point item from the Interpersonal Processes of

Care Survey short form, reflecting the quality of communication

between health care professionals and the study participants.

Participants were part of a stratified, random digit dialing

telephone survey (The Pew Hispanic Center/Robert Wood Johnson

Foundation Latino Health Survey) of (N=3,899) adult Latinos aged

50

≥ 18 years which made the methodology of the study strong.

Initial telephone interviews (Wave 1) were conducted in summer

2007 and had a response rate of 39.5%. Participants were again

called in the spring of 2008 for a second interview (Wave 2),

focusing on medical care received and chronic disorders. Subjects

for this study are the (N=1,067) persons who completed the (Wave

2) interview. These methods produced a statistically

representative sample in the contiguous United States.

Major findings indicated only 19% of all persons reported

any discrimination from doctors or medical staff. Discrimination

was significantly associated with age (P=.02). Younger population

(18-29 years) were 22% more likely to report discrimination than

persons of ≥ 65 years. Persons of poor health reported 39% more

health care staff discrimination. On the discrimination scales,

younger persons reported more discrimination and U.S. born

Latinos reported more discrimination than foreign-born (0.32 SD

versus -0.23 SD).

The limitations of this study lies in the fact that a cross-

sectional study cannot make a good argument on the specific

causes of the problem. The DAS mean scale is relatively low,

51

discriminatory experiences are occurring only a few times a year.

The follow up of (Wave 2) was also limited due to financial

constraints; there was a short time window to complete the call

back. Issues pertaining discrimination were not well defined

whether they were medical or non-medical. When paired together

they were not so collinear and didn’t appear to create models as

presented in the study.

This paper is important to this field study because it

perceives discrimination and its association with quality of care

measures among U.S. - born Latinos. Discrimination knowledge is

an important variable and indispensible knowledge in the creation

of a teaching program intended to address cultural deficiencies

among health care professionals. It is important to know specific

details on how a minority population feels discriminated against

so the same discriminatory factors can be avoided in the

conception of CC programs.

In this study, Racial/Ethnic Discrimination in Health Care: Impact on

Perceived Quality of Care Sorkin, Metzger, and Alba, (2009) evaluate

whether the perception of poor health care is involved with

discrimination perceptions by minorities, and its associations

52

with socio-demographics, access to care, and patient satisfaction

across racial and ethnic groups. The methods for this study

included a survey of the California Health Interview Survey

(CHIS), which is a telephone survey of the state of California

civilian non-institutionalized population and interviews randomly

selected adults in more than 40,000 households. The CHIS include

California’s major racial and ethnic groups.

Five languages were used in this survey: English, Spanish,

Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean. Adjustments for non-response

households without telephones were made and the sample of the

analyses was restricted to adults, 18 years or older who rated

the quality of their health care in the last 12 months

(N=36,831). An 11-point Likert scale (0 = worst health care

possible, 10 = best health care possible) was used and the

primary independent variables were race, ethnicity and feeling

discriminated against in health care because of race and/or

ethnicity. Other variables used were health status, insurance

status, education level, English proficiency, chronic health

conditions and country of birth.

53

To determine how respondents felt about how discrimination

affected their health care, an extensive analysis was performed

with the Statistical Software for Analysis of Complex Survey

(SUDAAN). This is a statistical software package that specializes

in providing efficient and accurate analysis of data from complex

studies. The analysis design had four distinct phases: (a)

generation of descriptive statistics, (b) multivariable logistic

regression models to determine impact of race, (c) models were

than built in a sequential manner: race/ethnicity, discrimination

and other social variables, and (d) stratified analysis to test

four separate regression models to determine the relationship

between experience of discrimination in health care and ratings

of quality of care for each group adjusting for socio-demographic

variables and indicators of access and satisfaction.

The large sample population consisting of more than 40,000

households in the state of California which are a significant

number if compared with other similar studies and are strength in

the study. The response rate was 60%. The CHIS data was also

weighted to account for the complex sample design and to adjust

54

for non-response households. The study also uses a wide range of

discriminating variables that were used in the assessment.

The authors of this study found that respondents from all

ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to report

discrimination and have an unfavorable view of their health care

system. Health care in the United States is not evenly

distributed and it negatively affects racial and ethnic

minorities. Ethnic minorities are more likely to have a lower

quality of health care but the mediators of such reports are not

known. The study also finds that among Latinos one of the most

important variables of perceived satisfaction has a close

relationship with perceived quality suggesting that Latinos are

more satisfied with their health care when a linguistic and

culturally sensitive environment is provided.

The limitation in this cross sectional study design is that

it precludes causal inferences between racial and ethnic

discrimination in health care. Reports can be skewed as the group

that is sensitive to discrimination is more likely to report

problems with their health care. Due to this model, authors

55

cannot determine if the reported quality differences were due to

actual care received or patient’s expectations.

This article is important for this field study because it

highlights the significance of racial discrimination and its

possible detrimental effects in communication affecting health

care among minorities such as Latino populations. In order to

create curricula for cultural competence, there must be a good

understanding of how Latinos view health care. This study

emphasizes special communication needs that can generate more

patient satisfaction among the Latino population.

Race and Ethnicity and Satisfaction with Health Care

In the study, Race / Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction with

Health Care, the authors Aviland, Morales, Dial, and Pincus (2005)

evaluated the effects of race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status

on consumer health satisfaction levels. This study also seeks to

understand the findings which are consistent with continuing

health care disparities among ethnic and minority populations and

make recommendations for ways to improve the quality of care

among minority groups. The authors compare four global and three

56

composite ratings and their level of satisfaction among ethnic

minorities versus white and non-ethnic populations.

The study used dependant and independent variables using

questions regarding satisfaction with health plan and

satisfaction with medical care. The independent variables were

race, ethnicity and poverty status. There were also Case-Mix

(adjustment) variables. These included age, gender, perceived

health status, presence of medical problems in the family, health

plan type, Medicaid coverage, living in a rural area, and

education. The first two global questions focused on satisfaction

with health plan and satisfaction with medical care, a seven-

point Likert scale was used (1 = completely dissatisfied, 7 = completely

satisfied). The second set of two questions concerned whether one

would recommend their health care plan to family and friends and

intentions about switching to another plan, rated on four-point

scale (1 = definitely not, 4 = definitely yes). Data from surveyed

respondents with the analytic sample were compared with case-mix

variables. Multi-item composite measures were analyzed using a

Cronbach’s α. Linear regression was used to assess differences in

global and composite ratings by race ethnicity and poverty,

57

controlling for age, gender, perceived health status, family

medical problems, health plan type, Medicaid coverage, living in

a rural area, and education.

The study utilizes a large sample of surveying participants,

250,000 U.S. households mailed across 48 contiguous states,

obtaining a total of 152, 208 respondents. Also the utilization

of complex and sophisticated analytical designs such as,

multiple-Item composite questions, case-mix (adjustment)

variables, and regression gives this study strength by covering a

wide range of diversity and cultural variations and responses

from wide range ethnic groups in different areas of the country.

A significant number of charts with respondent’s analytical

samples are compared and cross measured and available in the

study.

One limitation of this study includes a survey that was

administered in English only. Since satisfaction ratings are

generally lower in non-English speaking groups, the exclusion of

non-English speaking individuals may have shown unreliable

results indicating a higher patient satisfaction. One factor to

take into consideration is that it only covers subjective

58

experiences with coverage and care and it does not evaluate

technical quality of care.

The major findings indicate a lower satisfaction rate among

non-English speakers or limited English speaking ability. This

study recommends the engagement of strategies for CC among health

care providers to increase minorities’ satisfaction with health

care. The recommendations made by this study are addresses the

main focus of this field study and are of significance for the

designing and implementation of CC curricula by understanding the

current level of satisfaction.

This study is significant to this field study because it

addresses minority satisfaction with health care and examines its

causes. This finding supports this field study hypothesis that

Latino patients with low English ability have lower satisfaction

with health care. The main findings of the study further support

this field study objective by making recommendations and

demonstrating how critical is the understanding of minority

patient satisfaction in the creation of cultural programs aiming

at improving patient satisfaction.

Theoretical Framework

59

In the field study: Culture Care: Diversity and Universality, theories

were derived from the disciplines of anthropology and nursing by

Madeleine Leininger (2002) and it was first written in 1960.

Leininger’s theory is based on the belief that a patient

population of a diverse cultural background can guide health care

professionals to provide care that is relevant to their cultural

beliefs. This theory is directed towards nurses’ ability to

develop their own core personal views of other cultures (Hughes &

Hood, 2007). This theory assumes that cultural specific care can

only be meaningful when nurses develop an inner understanding of

culturally diverse patients and their needs; it also assumes that

beyond inner core learning, knowledge of cultural care should be

learned from outside sources as well. The central thesis of this

theory is that care is the most powerful construct and the

central phenomena of nursing. If the meaning of culture care can

be fully understood, then the health care and well being of

individuals can be better addressed by culturally sensitive

nursing care.

Leininger maintains that cultural care can be learned

inductively or deductively. Nurses should obtain grounded

60

knowledge from Emic (insider) and Etic (outsider) sources. An

Emic source establishes that knowledge should be obtained from

the people or the culture because it makes information more

accurate. Etic refers to knowledge that comes from the outside

such as formal instruction, books and studies. Leininger’s theory

can be viewed as one of the most holistic because it uses diverse

learning methods and a wide spectrum of cultural understanding by

using two approaches to learning. Leininger focuses on the

concept of care based on the principle that people and their

perception of care are the most important element.

Leininger maintains there are four distinct reasons

culturally based care should be studied. Care appears to be

critically to human growth, development, and survival of the

human species to provide cultural congruent care according the

patients cultural needs. Care knowledge can be used to promote

healing and well being in clients to face death or to ensure the

survival of cultures through time to understand systematically

the broad and holistic cultural perspective to discover

expression and meaning of care, health, illness, and well being

as nursing knowledge. Hughes, and Hood (2007) in the study:

61

Teaching Methods and an Outcome Tool for Measuring Cultural Sensitivity in

Undergraduate Nursing Students, applied Leininger’s cultural theories

in the creation of curricula aimed at improving cultural

competencies among baccalaureate nursing students. Their study

has emphasized that when culturally competent care is understood

and practiced, nursing education, research, consultation,

teaching, and clinical practice is improved. The idea of their

study is also founded on Leininger’s statistics, indicating that

fewer than 15% of nursing graduates have taken transcultural

courses and fewer have received instruction on how to work on a

transcultural clinical setting (Hughes & Hoods, 2007). The

authors had a goal to decrease stereotypes and demonstrate the

importance of having a culturally sensitive background in

professional practice. The authors used Leininger’s theory to

develop a multicultural curriculum so students could function

effectively within American culture and also minority ethnic

cultures.

This field study mirrors Hughes and Hood’s (2007) study in

several aspects. Leininger’s cultural theories will be used with

the intent of helping students formulate a valid comparative

62

generalization based on cultural theories that have been

previously tested with success. Before courses can be planned or

designed it is necessary to ensure a conceptual framework with

the commitment to cultural care. Leininger’s cultural theory has

been accepted as one of the most adopted frameworks for nursing

cultural projects for over 20 years (Hughes & Hood, 2007). The

Culture Care theory model is also significant to this field study

because it defines fundamental principles for CC education. Its

assumptions serve as blueprints for the creation of an

educational tool. Its major assumptions are building blocks for

educational modalities of learning. Tomey and Alligood (2001)

found these assumptions to be: care is considered the central

essence of nursing; cultural care is the broadest holistic means

to know, explain, interpret, and predict nursing care phenomena

and to guide nursing care practice. Cultural care values, beliefs

are influenced by world view, language, religion, economic, and

environmental factors. Nurses must learn by using their inner

knowledge as well as research study material

Bacote and Bacote (2009) found that only when individuals

recognize their own assumptions of others who are different from

63

them and become conscious of their own personal bias and

prejudices, are then able to obtain cultural awareness. Bacote

and Bacote (2009), point out that it is not our skills in

observing details of cultural traits that makes us culturally

competent, but rather our self-awareness and respectful attitude

toward another culture’s point of view. Leininger’s theory

maintains social structure, worldviews, and cultural beliefs from

health, wellness, and illness that are closely linked and cannot

be viewed in a fragmentary way.

Shaya and Gbarayor (2006) suggest that in order to meet the

demands of a rapidly growing multi-ethnic population, training

for cultural competence courses must be created with curricula

focusing on evidence-based health disparities among racial and

ethnic minorities. Students should be culturally aware and

culturally sensitive. Another study by Chevannes (2002)

demonstrates the need to integrate cultural competence into the

foundations of educational competencies for health care

professionals. Subjects who participated aimed at assessing what

health professionals knew about care for multiethnic patient

groups. Another area of assessment was to measure student’s

64

perception of training needs in their area of work. It was found

also that 65% of participants confirmed that no attention was

given to their initial education of health care needs of

minorities; instead participants initiated self learning to

improve knowledge and understanding. Chevannes study validates

the need for implementation of methodology such as Leininger’s

theory as a guideline for communication improvements for minority

groups.

Chapter 3

Implementation

Introduction

Cultural competence in health care is important for

successful treatment outcomes as diagnosis, assessment and

discharge instructions are significantly associated with

65

communication exchanges between patients and health care

providers (HCP) (Cohen, Rivara, Marcuse, McPhillips & Davis,

2005). Language barriers, lack of health insurance, stereotyping

and prejudice are some of the variables contributing to health

disparities in the Latino patient population (Shaya & Gbarayor,

2006). Comprehension deficits between Latino patients and HCP are

also associated with low English proficiency, cultural

interpretation of medical-related events, and to some degree a

lack of cultural sensitivity by untrained HCP. Therefore,

facilitating cultural competency (CC) among HCP is important

because it increases patient satisfaction and diminishes

recidivism and medication errors (Cohen et al., 2005). The

establishment of cultural competency curricula and the provision

of instruments to increase cultural competency among HCP can also

help decrease the cultural gap between Latinos and HCP, and thus

contribute to an overall increase in positive health care

outcomes. Cultural competence in health can be described as the

ability of systems and health care professionals to provide high

quality care to patients with diverse values, beliefs and

behaviors, including the implementation of differential delivery

66

of care to meet patients’ social, cultural and linguistic needs

(Betancourt, Green & Carrillo, 2002).

Cultural competency tools can be better implemented and

accepted if some assumptions about today’s medical environment

are clarified. First, consider the assumption that CC education

does not justify its costs, and therefore should not be a

priority. A wealth of research shows how language barriers

obstruct access to health care, compromising quality of care,

increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes among LEP

patients, costing taxpayers billions of dollars in

hospitalization and litigation fees due to medical errors and

misdiagnosis (Ku & Flores, 2005; Cohen, et al. & Nailon, 2005).

Misdiagnosis and medical errors may be caused by lack of

effective communication between patients and HCP from different

cultures as many studies have shown. Medication errors are among

the most common hospital errors, accounting for 3% to 28% of all

hospitalizations due to inappropriate drug administration (Ronda

& Eduardo, 2005).The extra medical cost of treating drug-related

injuries occurring in hospitals alone is between $1.56 billion

and $5.6 billion dollars (Ronda & Eduardo, 2005). CC can be one

67

of many step measures helping address this problem at a low cost.

Education prevention would cost far less than hospitalization and

liability costs related to injuries caused by medical errors (Ku

& Flores, 2005). The Office of Management and Budget Costs (OMB)

reported that it would cost the nation $268 million dollars a

year to provide interpretation services in hospitals, outpatient

physicians, emergency, and dental visits (Ku & Flores, 2005).

Web-based learning (WBL) methodology, the objective of this field

study, would cost less than the translation services

implementation as budgeted by the OMB (Sitzmann, Kraiger, Stewart

& Wisher, 2006).

This field study proposes the implementation of CC

curricula, utilizing the creation of an electronic resource tool

for the improvement of care among the Latino population in the

clinical setting. Curricula for this program will utilize a web-

based format and will function as an electronic resource binder

and a CC on-line course available to nurses from any Internet

abled device.

68

Evidence

As evidenced by one study, a cultural deficit exists between

the nurses lacking proper CC education and Latino patients

(Nerenz, 2005). Due to cultural upbringing, Latinos have

developed a unique health literacy and perception relative to

medicine and medication treatments which differs from mainstream

American values. According to a study by Campos (2007), these

cultural traits are not always visible as Latino patients have a

tendency not to confront HCP on how they feel because their

cultural values require that they show “respecto” (respect) to

HCP. The implementation of this field study WBL project seeks to

address this and other similar discrepancies by making HCP more

aware of cultural differences. With increased awareness, HCP will

be able to better interact with Latino patients by being more

careful, omitting certain assumptions, and emphasizing and

inquiring about important issues.

Health insurers such as BlueCross BlueShield of Florida

(BCBSF) and Kaiser Permanente (KP) have implemented successful CC

programs (Tervalon, 2009; BlueCross BlueShield of Florida, 2007).

BCBSF’s “Cultural Competence and Diversity Imperative” program,

69

designed to aid workers, reflects the changing composition of

Florida’s state population, now numbering 20% Latino and African-

American. The BCBSF (2007) program works with all staff levels to

develop a five-year strategy plan identifying actions and

initiatives to move BCBSF from recognizing cultural issues to

fully understanding them. Kaiser Permanente is a leader in CC

initiatives, and has created a wide range of measures to fully

address specific ethnic populations, from educational guidelines

in cultural competence to in-depth programs such as “Centers of

Excellence in Cultural Competence” (Betancourt et al., 2005).

The Federal Government is also stepping up the CC

implementation in various ways. The Health Resources and Services

Administration (HRSA), along with the Institute for Health Care

Improvement (IHI) which are branches of the federal government,

have developed the “Health Disparity Collaboratives” (HDC), which

address racial and ethnic disparities in community health centers

(Landon et al., 2010). Intervention centers which have adopted

HDC have consistently improved services and outcomes for patients

with asthma and diabetes. Intervention centers have had

significant results in measures of prevention and screening,

70

including a 21% increase in foot examinations for patients with

diabetes, 14% increase in the use of anti-inflammatory

medication, and a 16% increased in the assessment of blood sugar

levels (Landon et al., 2010).

The delivery method chosen for this educational project is

based on evidence supporting the use of new technologies such as

video and computer learning designs and WBL (Balslev, Grave,

Muijtjens, & Scherpbier, 2005; Cherrett, Wills, Price, Maynard, &

Dror, 2009; Sánchez, 2010). Eight out of ten case studies on

average indicate positive gains when students use WBL over

traditional learning. They also indicated that is WBL is not by

nature superior to traditional learning processes, but depend on

its implementation methods and tools that are appropriate for the

teaching objectives. Problems with WBL appear to be associated

with the use of technology without a well defined purpose (Cook,

2007). Disadvantages of WBL also include social isolation, poor

instructional design, and lack of personal interaction. Other

studies have shown that one of the largest sources of

dissatisfaction with WBL is the lack interaction with the

instructor and other participants (Curran et al., 2005). An in-

71

depth analysis of WBL tools and processes are beyond the scope of

this project; instead we will discuss the tools selected for this

project and briefly discuss their benefits and rationale.

The WBL format was chosen for this project for several

reasons. In a survey of organizations conducted by the American

Society of Training and Development, the percentage of companies

using WBL technology to deliver training increased from 8% in

1999 to 27% in 2004 (Chou & Liu, 2005). WBL is becoming a

favorite training option in the industry, including corporations,

government and higher education. There are several reasons for

this increase; its unlimited distribution points, lower costs,

and is easily delivered via computer using the Internet. Another

WBL advantage is that websites can be easily updated with rich

media content such as text, audio and video, allowing student

interaction and data storage and management (Sitzmann et al.,

2006).

This WBL project will use a construct design which is based

on the Person-Centered Learning (PCL) method developed by the American

psychologist Carl Rogers (Derntl & Motschnig-Pitrik, 2005). The

PCL hypothesis is that if students are given the freedom to

72

explore areas based on their personal interests and encouraged to

seek solutions based on their personal values, they will reach

higher academic results and be more self confident. PCL is also

known as PCeL or Person Centered Electronic Learning or “e-learning”

(Derntl & Motschnig-Pitrik, 2005). Implementation of models such

as PCeL in a computer educational environment can take advantage

of several media tools available today. The tools at the core of

this proposed learning program are patient case simulation (PCS)

and educational and interactive video.

Some studies have demonstrated the efficacy of video in

training and education (Balslev et al., 2005; Cherrett et al.,

2009; Sánchez et al., 2010). In one study evaluating the

learning performance of Black and Hispanic male patients on

increasing syphilis education prevention, 206 males were studied

and the intervention group scored 24 percent higher than control

groups (p<.001) (Sánchez et al., 2010). Results of comparisons

made between the effects of video learning and paper based

learning resulted in higher data exploration, theory building and

theory evaluation suggesting that the cognitive process were

stimulated by video screenings. Findings are congruent with other

73

studies pointing to an increased capacity of memory storage due

to visual and auditory information (Balslev, 2005). Video can

also be a powerful and rich medium in e-learning. Information can

be presented in an attractive and consistent manner achieving

better learning results (Zhang, Zhou, Briggs & Nunamaker, 2005).

To potentiate the effectiveness of video learning,

interactivity will be added in order to promote engagement and

involvement from students. In one study, 75% of subjects

‘strongly agreed’ that interactive video had enhanced their

learning experiences (Cherrett, 2009).

Program Objectives

The goals of this field study are overarching. The immediate

goals however are objectives concerning improved efficiency and

safety in caring for Latinos in the clinical setting by providing

critical cultural information. After taken the web based learning

program, HCP should demonstrate an increase in awareness in the

following areas:

Improved communication with Latino patients. HCP should demonstrate

an increase in their ability to interview a Latino patient

74

effectively; understanding of Latino cultural background; an

increase in the ability to give health instructions to

Latino patients. HCP should also demonstrate a good

understanding of the patient’s conceptualizations and

preferences. HCP should be able to identify at least 80% of

interview and communication strategies techniques provided

in the CC course.

Ability to successful make recommendations. HCP should demonstrate

improvements in their rate of success for recommendations of

treatments. HCP should be able to gain patients involvement

in regards to their treatment. HCP should demonstrate

understanding on how to implement cultural relevant

approaches leading to successful health treatments and

outcomes.

Ability to negotiate with Latino patients. HCP should demonstrate

increasing understanding of patient’s perceptions and to

negotiate the provider’s perspective to the patients’

perspective so that treatment plans can be successfully

implemented. HCP should be able to create partnerships with

patients by using all skills learned in the CC course.

75

The overarching goals of this project are harder to be

evaluated. They concern long term gains to be achieved with the

implementation of this CC project over an extended period of

time. HCP who engage in this type of CC curricula should improve

in the following areas:

Cultural awareness. HCP should demonstrate an increase in

deliberate cognitive process in which sensitivity, values,

beliefs and life ways become incorporated in practice as HCP

successful strategizes treatment for clients from other

cultures.

Improvements in cultural skills. This is defined as the ability to

collect relevant cultural data regarding the client’s health

histories and presenting problems as well as accurately

performing cultural and physical assessments.

Cultural desire. HCP should begin to develop self motivation to

become culturally competent and a desire to engage in the

process of CC. A genuine self motivated desire to become

76

culturally competent is beneficial because it leads to

further knowledge and sustainability.

Population, Setting, and Stakeholders

The target population includes HCP working in hospitals in

Northern California where there is a large Latino population.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Latinos in California

account for 37% of the population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008). HCP

most likely to benefit from this CC program are nurses and

doctors who have limited or no experience with Latino populations

or have moved from areas of the country where Latino patient

population is small.

The Board of Registered Nurses (BRN) in a 2008 survey

indicated that white non-Hispanic nurses in the Bay Area comprise

63% of the work force, yet fewer than 7% speak Spanish. The

assumption is that the lack of Spanish comprehension signifies a

lack of Latino culture familiarity and understanding, making this

sample group an ideal target for this CC literacy project, even

though it is possible that some nurses might be Latino cultural

savvy without knowing how to speak Spanish.

77

Several stakeholders with links and involvement in this

project and its target population are identified. Three

institutions have been reviewed and were found to hold similar

and close values associated with this CC project, as well as

Latino community improvement issues; both are potential financial

contributors and supporters. The California Healthcare

Foundation, with its program Innovations for the underserved, is a

philanthropic public foundation with educational, leadership, and

health programs involving the Hispanic community of Northern

California. The Health Trust, a charitable foundation supporting

healthy living, healthy aging, and healthy Latino community in

Silicon Valley offers grants ranging from $15,000 to $75,000.

This organization has supported similar educational projects

aimed at the improvement of health conditions of Latinos. Health

Trust’s mission supports health projects to facilitate health

care services for the underserved by promoting education and

cultural understanding among HCP and the community it serves.

Another potential source of funding is The Baxter International

Foundation which in 2008 has made contributions totaling more

than $4 million, including $2.82 million earmarked for the

78

improvement of quality and accessibility of healthcare among the

disadvantaged and undeserved communities, as well as training HCP

to address health needs and several other projects involving

cultural deficiencies of the underserved.

Kaiser Permanente (KP) is another important partner.

According to the Permanente Journal, KP has been a leader in

culturally competent care to a diverse patient population for the

past 29 years (Tervalon, 2009). Under the direction of its

National Diversity Council, the organization is a leader in

advancing culturally competent care. Among several others, KP has

established “Centers of Excellence,” a project which supports

innovative clinical models responding to the needs of minority

populations by providing language-specific primary care in

Spanish and Chinese as well as interpreter services. KP was also

ranked No. one among the 10 companies for Latinos in 2009 by

Diversity inc., as determined by a statistical analysis of

responses to a 200 question survey (Frankel, 2010). This CC

project will be piloted by Kaiser Health Center and its personnel

in collaboration with staff exclusively associated with the

project.

79

Other possible stakeholders are existing schools of

continuing education for nurses such as The American Nurses

Credentialing Center (ANCC), a subsidiary of the American Nurses

Association (ANA). The ANCC provides continuing education courses

promoting safe, positive work environments through the Magnet

Recognition Program and the Pathway to Excellence programs; they also

accredit providers of continuing nursing education. This CC

course can be considered for approval in their process of

Accreditation of Continuing Nursing Education Providers, a voluntary process

wherein ANCC reviews and accredits providers of continuing

nursing education credits. The criteria for approval includes

planning, needs assessment, purpose and objectives,

implementation, activity evaluation, and outcomes evaluation.

Implementation of Plan

One strategy for successful implementation and positive

outcomes of this project is to increase nurses’ interest by

promoting a “genuine desire” to be culturally competent (Bacote &

Bacote, 2009). Genuine desire can be defined as motivation

inherited in the HCP to want to engage in the process of cultural

competency. Madelaine Leininger’s theory of culture care diversity and

80

universality was chosen with this task in mind. Leininger’s theory

incorporates broad humanist dimensions about people in their

cultural life context, focuses on identifying values, beliefs,

life-ways, and symbolic referents related to culture care

phenomena (appendix D). Leininger’s theory promotes one’s own

discovery of cultural concepts and the use of cultural congruent

care that is appropriate to families and individuals (Leininger,

2002).

The creation of this project will involve different phases

and processes: (a) content research to fulfill the objectives of

a full web-based CC course focusing on Latino culture relating to

health care. The bulk of the research will rely on the wealth of

research available which has been delineated in Chapter Two.

Additional information is being gathered through professional

clinics and organizations which serve Latino populations in the

Bay Area; (b) the design of a web-based course using researched

cultural content. This will require the hiring of professionals

with specific expertise to ensure course quality and academic and

didactic consistency and flow; (c) the assembling of this

material into a web-based medium will require the hiring of a

81

professional webmaster to implement the latest technologies for

quality experience; (e) additional help will be needed to enhance

the web experience adding audio and video. San Francisco State

University Broadcast department students will be contacted to

produce these items; and (f) the final web-based learning course

will be implemented using two different approaches.

The method of distribution for this CC course will function

in two areas but target the same population group. The first area

of distribution will be the inclusion of the course into an

annual competencies program or in-house education requirement in

hospitals. The hospital is the setting where distribution and

advertising takes place. Hospitals may also want to incorporate

this CC course in their new graduate programs. Flyers will be

created containing information on course content and collaborator

scheduling instructions (appendix G). The course will be hosted

on a private server and available through the Internet. Staff

Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) will be invited to take part

promoting the course in their regular educational updates and

lectures, and visiting staff from other member hospitals will be

encouraged to examine and comment on the program.

82

The second distribution method is broad-based and intends to

make the course available to a larger population of nurses. The

main target population will be any nurse with Internet access

seeking to engage in a CC program for accreditation of continuing

education credits or simple cultural skills improvement. It will

require State of California Accreditation of Continuing Nursing Education

Providers approval for its addition into the web-based program for

continuing education and license renewal credit hours.

The web-based learning method for this project will utilize

video, text, narration, graphics, resources, interactive

presentations and lessons (appendix C 1-3). The web-site will

provide two main services: the first is to serve as a real time

resource binder for HCP working with Latinos. These resources are

designed to be assessed as needed by HCP at work. The main

features will include a medical Spanish dictionary and a resource

page entitled “e-manual for the Hispanic patient care”. Some of

the help resources will be available for download to hand held

devices. The e-manual will provide an alphabetical listing of

health care scenarios and conditions with relevancy to Latinos

83

and their care. Strategies for quick referencing will be also

available in this page.

The second main function will provide six interactive

modules with videos and interactive media (appendix C 3). The

video modules will be: Pre-Test, Hispanic Culture, Know your Latino patient,

Latino health beliefs and practices, Patient Cases and Post Test (appendix F). The

first three modules following the pre-test are videos intended to

develop some cultural understanding of Hispanic culture; typical

expected behaviors from Latino patients and what health

conditions Latinos are at risk. The module called Patient Cases

contains interactive media where students will be given a virtual

patient to interact with. Patient cases will be converted to e-

learning experiences. The virtual patients in this module will

emulate common scenarios and difficult communication situations

encounter by nurses (appendix C-3). A picture of the patient will

appear along with text explaining the patients’ condition. A set

of questions and answers will be given as choices for students to

use. Depending on questions and answers students select, a

progress display levels at the bottom of the page will indicate

84

positive or negative outcome (appendix C-3). At any time students

will be able to assess rationales concerning the effectiveness of

their choices. Students will be able to create an account and

take the modules at their own pace. The site will also have the

ability to test and keep student scores. Students will need to

score ≥70% in order to pass to following module.

Resource allocation and costs

Most major expenses will be allocated for website

construction and hosting, the hiring of professionals for content

research and web-based course development, and associated costs

for developing and producing ancillary materials consisting of

brochures or booklets that will serve as companion pieces for the

web-based learning modules. Donation of materials and volunteer

work have been considered (appendix A).

Grant-awarding foundations have been chosen as primary

sources of funding for this project and institutions which match

this project’s criteria were searched. These institutions are:

85

(1) The Health Trust of Silicon Valley, (2) The Baxter

International Foundation, (3) and The California Healthcare

Foundation. Details about these foundations can be found under

the stakeholders heading.

The project’s implementation costs are divided into three

areas: technology, research content and course assembling.

Technology costs are associated with the technical construction

of a website; these costs include (a) hiring a webmaster for site

architecture and development; (b) hosting server costs; and (c)

maintenance and technical support. Web construction costs are

estimated to be between $6,000 and $7,000 until site is fully

functional. Research and content creation involves hiring

professional researchers and consultants experienced in Latino

cultural issues. Another professional will be hired to further

develop the content into a web-based learning format producing a

high quality experience in web-based learning. Research costs are

estimated to be between $2,500 to $3,000 dollars. Finally the

implementation of the program, in concert with the participating

institutions, will require the hiring of promotional experts and

86

professional organizer and event planners with estimated costs

between $1,000 to $2,000 dollars.

The non-profit customer-based Web developer “NGO web

solutions” is providing templates of a temporary website which

will serve as a project pilot for grant-writing proposals. The

future creation of the site will follow after funds have been

made available. Video segments for content creation are being

provided in kind by students from San Francisco State

University’s (SFSU) Broadcast and Electronic Communication Arts

department. Support for site implementation and promotion is also

being provided in kind by volunteers from SFSU’s César E. Chávez

Institute.

Summary

Research reviewed for this project has consistently pointed

to the need of effective communication between Latino patients

and HCP for achieving better health outcomes. Latinos are

significantly at risk due to deficiencies in language

comprehension, lack of insurance and stereotyping by HCP who may

be unaware of cultural diversity. It’s widely assumed that the

implementation of cultural competency courses can help bridge the

87

cultural gap between HCP and Latino patient population. Small

investments in CC can produce significant savings in hospital

litigations, fees due to medical errors and misdiagnosis which

can be caused by ineffective communication between HCP and low

English proficiency patients. This field study proposes the

implementation of CC courses and the creation of an electronic

resource tool for the improvement of care among the Latino

population in the clinical setting.

Latinos when migrating to the United States bring with them

a unique health literacy and cultural perception which are

different than the American main stream. These traits are not

always visible and have a tendency to be ignored by untrained

HCP. A culturally trained health care staff can also produce

positive changes in areas beyond the immediate clinical setting

promoting less racial discrimination and less stereotype

formation. Some well established health organizations have been

using successful CC programs for over five years. The Federal

Government has also stepped up efforts to create CC programs

which have improved patient satisfaction among ethnic diverse

88

communities aiding in treatment of diabetes, increased access of

blood sugar levels and medication compliance.

This field study has objectives that are immediate and

overarching. The immediate objectives centers on improved

efficiency and safety in caring for Latinos in the clinical

setting. Improvements on listening to the patient, explaining,

acknowledging, recommending and negotiating should be observed

among HCP who take the CC course. The overarching objectives

should be an increase in cultural awareness, cultural skills and

a display of self initiative to become culturally competent which

is coined “cultural desire”. The target population of this

project consists of HCP providers from health establishments who

participate in this cultural competency program in Northern

California. This HCP target population are likely to have little

training and lack of experience treating Latino patient

populations.

There are several stake holders with links to this project.

The institutions involved hold values that are similar to this

project’s goals. The contributors and supporters are foundations,

corporations and trusts with which hold interest in minorities

89

and health care projects. Partners are also the health

institutions such as hospitals and clinics who will host this

project adding or incorporating it to their ongoing cultural

competency relevant to Latinos.

One strategy for implementing this project has utilization

of Madelaine Leininger’s theory of culture care diversity and universality. The

creation and implementation of this project will involve three

phases: research, web-site creation and the project’s

implementation into educational programs of stakeholder’s

institution. Major expenses incurred in this project are the

website construction, the hiring of professionals for content

research and web-based course development, and brochures or

booklets production.

90

Chapter 4

Evaluation

The evaluation of this program has ties with stakeholders

who sponsor cultural competency or cultural education programs

such as the one in this field study. The efficacy of this

educational tool will require stakeholders’ engagement,

91

evaluation, testing and revisions. The focus of this evaluation

will be the program goals previously explained in chapter 3. The

evaluation tools selected for this field study can also measure

the overarching goals and long term use of the project; however

it will require an entire new evaluation process due to the

complexities associated with overarching goal evaluations. The

subjects Included in the evaluation are all participants in the

project.

This program will utilize two evaluation tools: The Centers

for Disease Control Framework for Program Evaluation (CDCFPE) (Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention 2010), a complex evaluating system

consisting of 6 steps; and the Inventory for Assessing the Process of

Cultural Competence among Healthcare Professionals-Revised (IAPCC-R)

(Appendix E). The IAPCC-R method was chosen specifically because

it was created exclusively for the evaluation of cultural

competency programs among HCP and graduate students in the allied

health fields. It is important to point out that the IAPCC-R is a

questionnaire based structure which assesses 25 items measuring

five cultural constructs using a 4-point likert scale (appendix

E).

92

The CDCFPE is the main structure for this evaluation. It is

a complex method providing a robust structure organized into six

steps: engagement of stakeholders, description of program, design

evaluation, evidence, justification of conclusions, and ensuring

share and learning. Following is a detailed description of the 6

steps. The description of the program which is the step 2 of the

CDCFPE program was fully covered in chapter 3 and will not be

included in the following steps description.

Step 1: Engaging StakeholdersCultural competency projects such as the one proposed by

this field study requires partnerships. Partners bring with them

a set of value systems they want to see reflected in the project

they sponsor; therefore stakeholders must be engaged in the

inquiry and evaluation process to ensure that their perspectives

are understood. Findings will have a tendency to be disregarded

if evaluation fails to address stakeholders’ objectives thus

making the role of engagement, a crucial one. Three main critical

areas of stakeholders’ relationships with the evaluating process

must be identified: program’s operations, target population, and

users.

93

The program’s operations for this project are all groups

involved in the funding, donations or any other benefit made to

the project. The groups most involved in this project are: The

California Healthcare Foundation, The Health Trust, and The

Baxter International Foundation which are this project’s main

financial backers. Even though these organizations are vital,

they are not necessarily the ones responsible for handling the

actual physical production and execution. Other subgroups such as

individuals’ contributors or volunteers are involved and a

distinction must be made between evaluations of organizations as

entities and personal evaluations of individuals. Personal

evaluations should have different criteria from corporate

evaluations as a whole.

The target population is also considered a stakeholder and a

participant in the evaluation process. All the individuals,

communities, workplaces, advocacy groups, professional

associations and anyone who is directly or indirectly affected by

this program should also be identified and included in the

evaluation process. Another target population is the staff nurses

and doctors and other health care staff who will be taking this

94

CC course. Other groups are the Latino patients who are directly

affected by changes in behavior and education among HCP. These

groups are important because their approval or disapproval or

criticism can affect the input and influence evaluation results.

The inclusion of proponents or opponents to this project can

strengthen the evaluation credibility.

Finally the entire body of participants must be identified

and a representative or a specific person in charge for each

subgroup chosen so changes are reflected for each area of the

project and in control of stakeholders objectives. This action

will take place early in the project and each representative will

be required to maintain constant and frequent interaction with

all groups and subgroups involved in workings of the project.

Sharing information through meetings and briefings with the all

the groups will ascertain equilibrium and help to avoid conflicts

of interest and over emphasis from a single individual or

stakeholder over the entire project.

Step 3: Focusing the Evaluation Design

The focus of the evaluation design begins with the

understanding that some designs may not meet the needs of

95

stakeholders. Design options must be evaluated so that the best

format meets the informational needs of all stakeholders.

Therefore the focus of the evaluation must address the core

values of stakeholders or the issues stakeholders are most

concerned. While meeting these criteria, the design must also

meet the demands of time and resource limitations. An evaluation

procedure must also be established before collection begins;

changing procedures when evaluation is in progress might be

impossible and a thorough plan must be created before evaluation

begins. Among the items to be considered in the evaluation are:

purpose, users, uses, questions, methods, and agreements.

The purpose as a consideration for this evaluation design is

to assess the effects and gain insight. To investigate effect

changes we will look at the relationship between this CC program

agenda and improvements in Latino patient care resulting in

improved satisfaction. Even though patient satisfaction is part

of the overarching goal of this program, its evaluation is beyond

the scope of this field study. The effect assessment focus on

measurements of changes in behaviors among the target population

and HCP associated with the administration of this program.

96

Effect evaluation will also determine the direct and indirect

action or effectiveness of the program. Parameters also will be

established to determine if program produces similar of better

results than other compatible CC programs.

The users and uses parameters will be established in

accordance with the program scope including age group, target

population and stakeholders’ core ideologies. The users are the

individuals who will receive evaluation. In the case of this

field study, the users are the HCP participating in the program.

The uses refer to the specific useful objectives the evaluation

data will create: to gain insight, assess needs, identify

barriers for future program changes, assess effect, and affect

participants.

The questions parameter defines boundaries for the

evaluation, pointing to what the focus of the CC program will be.

The formatting of questions encourages stakeholders to expose

what they believe or desire from the program goals as a whole.

The question development may also produce and expose differences

between stakeholders and their expectation. At the heart of this

evaluation design are the issues of greatest concern for the

97

stakeholders, and only the options which best address their needs

are considered priority.

The method for evaluation is based on scientific research

and evidence based practice. The evaluating methods should be

designed so it provides information that meets the stakeholders’

informational needs. The methods should also match the

informational needs of the primary users, uses, and the set of

evaluating questions. The choice of design should be carefully

selected as it has implications for what will count as evidence

and validity. The methodological decision also has implications

on how the program will operate and how the program participants

will be involved; what data collection instruments will be used;

what are the appropriate methods of analysis, and

interpretations. Methods may need to be revised or modified

during the implementation process.

The agreements clarify and summarize the roles and

responsibilities among those in charge of the evaluating plan

execution. The agreement also provides guidelines for the

implementation plan and what and how resources will be allocated

such as money, personnel, time and information. Agreement plays a

98

significant role in this field study where ethical and cultural

issues are at the core of the project. Agreement is also provides

guidelines for administrative matters.

Step 4: Gathering Credible Evidence

Another important function of the evaluation is to produce a

complete picture of the program in all its relevant details so

that the information is credible and useful for primary users

which are the objective of step four of the CDC evaluation

framework (CDC, 2010). This information should be represented by

the evidence of these evaluations and should be trusted by the

stakeholders as reliable and relevant. This evidence is produced

by the type of questions being asked and what are the motives

behind them (CDC, 2010). Before the program begins there will be

meetings with stakeholders and their participation in the general

process of choosing parameters, program indicators, expected

outcomes and general core concepts. Among the relevant aspects

needing evaluation are increased HCP perception of cultural

issues relative to Latino patient population; and understanding

of cultural perceptions in Latino patient population relative to

health care and an overall increased ability to communicate with

99

Latinos. Other parameters which are important to stakeholders

will be discussed or added to the evaluation program. Multiple

sources of data evaluation and gathering procedures will be used

to ensure improved data credibility. Another important provision

is that special training provided to the staff who will conduct

educational and evaluating sessions such as administration of the

pretest and posttest (appendix F).

Evaluation will be performed by analysis of quantitative and

qualitative data. The data will be collected by managers and CNS

staff involved in the project. The data will originate from

answers to tests and questionnaires administered to participants.

Qualitative data will be evaluated by trained staff and all final

data will be entered into a computer running dedicated analysis

software. Prior to the test administration there will be a

consultation with statisticians and data analysis specialists to

determine the ideal psychometric method to start data gathering.

The evaluation of overarching objectives of this study will be

planned as an additional longitudinal project which could take up

to 5 years to implement.

Step 5: Justifying Conclusions

100

The evaluation of conclusions is the fifth step of the CDC

framework. The justification for the conclusions is tied to

previously agreed parameters by the stakeholders, therefore they

must agree with an evaluation criterion before data is gathered

and evaluation process begins (CDC, 2010). The parameters for

conclusion justification in step 5 of this framework are:

standards, analysis and synthesis, interpretation, judgment, and recommendations

(CDC, 2010). The standards for this evaluation will also reflect

the values of the stakeholders which provide the basis for

judging the program performance. These values are centered in

promoting cultural awareness in health care and are the basis for

considering the program successful or unsuccessful. The analysis

and synthesis requires that each isolated finding be analyzed

independently to insure that a larger picture is formed and is

accurate. In the case of this field study items such as the

degree in which students have dedicated to the program and the

level of communication they have achieved with patients are some

of the parameters of independent analysis. One of the principal

assumptions of this study’s evaluation is that participants who

score higher in their posttest have improved their cultural

101

competency levels in regards to treating Latino patients. The

merit, worth, or significance and changes needed for improvement

of the program are contained in the judgment and recommendation

parameters of step five. These parameters will be evaluated by

panels and voting sessions among the stakeholders. Comparison of

this program with others should be easily obtained since there

are a great number of CC programs in existence and their

respective evaluation results can make this evaluation more

reliable.

Step 6: Ensuring Use and Sharing Lessons Learned

Steps six of CDC’s framework addresses usage parameters and

follow up procedures. Specific efforts are needed to ensure that

evaluating processes are used and disseminated correctly. All HCP

participating in this CC will be encouraged to continue studies

leading to a better understanding of cross cultural backgrounds

emphasizing learning and expanding foreign vocabulary. Health

institutions such as clinics and hospitals will be informed of

results and evaluation processes with the objective of promoting

interest in CC programs. The overall reduction in communication

problems can lower the rate of incorrect assessments and

102

diagnosis among Latino patients’ resulting in decreased length of

stay, and hospital cost (Cohen et al., 2005). The findings will

be used to assist the expansion of similar programs in other

hospital and clinics.

Additional methods

The Inventory for assessing the process of cultural competence among health

professionals (IAPCC) will be used as part of the assessment for

cultural competency improvements and consist of a four-point

Likert scale and five sub-scales and it was revised in 2003 (Tan

et al., 2007). IAPCC scores indicate on which level a

professional is operating: cultural proficiency, cultural competence, cultural

awareness, or cultural incompetence. It consists of a 25 item

methodology assessing five constructs: desire, awareness,

knowledge, skill, and encounters (appendix E). The key pivotal

construct “cultural desire” is defined as the “motivation of HCP

to “want” to engage in the process of becoming culturally

competent (Musolino, et al., 2009). Details of IAPCC-R®.

Questionnaires using a 4 point likert scale will also be used to

103

evaluate the good performance of the course and its overall

functionality as well as its efficiency and how students feel

about the methodology used and technology innovation such as

interactive video.

Time frame for evaluation

To effectively evaluate the efficacy of this program will

require a longitudinal study. It is estimated that at least 5

years longitudinal study will be needed to evaluate the full

impact of this CC project. In order to conduct a longitudinal

evaluation is also suggested the creation of 3 distinct phases.

Phase 1 of the project is called the pilot phase where the

project would be implemented on a trial basis. In this phase only

minimal or essential elements would be used seeking low cost and

easy implementation. This first step is designed to obtain

feedback and to chart directions of the upcoming phases. Phase 2

begins after the implementation and evaluation of phase 1 has

been completed. Evaluation of phase 1 would significantly help

the implementation of phase 2 by working as an experimental

showcase, convincing stakeholders of the viability and allowing

them to have a snap shot of the project. On phase 2 the

104

established design outlined in this paper would be fully

implemented. Some changes might be added conforming to previous

experience learned on phase 1. At the end of 4 years, phase 3

would be implemented and it will signify the culmination,

refinement and inclusion of new technologies creating a well

established CC course beyond the original plan. The inclusion of

data from the evaluation of phase 1 and 2 would be included as

improvements in the final phase 3.

The long term evaluation can be performed after phase 3 is

operational. Phase 3 if successful would cement and consolidate a

long term budget relationship with the stakeholders ensuring

monitoring and frequent evaluations and the creation of audits.

It is suggested that at the end of each phase, an evaluation is

performed and its results analysis and presented to stakeholders.

Evaluation design for phase 3 will be created at a future date

when changes are well absorbed.

SummaryEvaluation is an important part of this cultural competency

program because it produces measurable and identifiable strengths

and gains, but also finds the weaknesses, limitations and makes

105

recommendations. Evaluation can also be instrumental in creating

parameters for change and improvements for the program and other

programs with similar goals. Another crucial role of evaluation

is to produce a mechanism in which stakeholders can have

participation and input in the programs they are funding and also

satisfy their desire to see if the program is in par with their

goals and objectives. Evaluation also serves to demonstrate the

program cost effectiveness after input and output are measured

and analyzed. Evaluation can also measure any improvement or

degree of involvement with staff conducting the program. Finally,

evaluation can function as a guarantee of program credibility

relative to its proposed goals and objectives.

Chapter 5

Conclusion

Introduction

The implications, limitations, and recommendations of this

field study are examined in this chapter. The implications of

this study affecting nurses, doctors and other health care

providers will be evaluated; the global impact of CC in the

106

health care environment will also be evaluated. This CC program

also presents limitations that will be discussed as well as the

limitation encountered during the creation of this field study.

Included are also the recommendations for further research needed

for updating and changes for upcoming versions of this CC program

which focuses on the improvement of communication between Latino

patients and HCP in the United States.

Implications

This field study intends to impact the nursing profession,

and specifically nurses working among large Latino patient

populations. By increasing awareness of Latino culture, nurses

may play a role in the improvement of well-being among the Latino

patients with positive repercussions to the Latino community.

Patient education is an important part of the nursing profession,

and the improvements made in the communication skills involving

diverse populations fits within the nurse scope of practice.

Other important interactions demanding communication is patient

assessment requiring correct interpretation of cultural

perceptions. Improvements in communication among HCP in a

cultural diverse environment can improve the quality of care and

107

patient satisfaction.

This field study has also implications for nurse educators

and hospital staff such as social workers responsible for

discharging patients and arranging community placement after

patient discharge. This is particularly true for the CNS who

identifies nursing related problems in the hospital and seeks

solutions by providing educational agenda. Promoting

participation and integration to this CC program in hospitals

will require the CNS to be knowledgeable of Latino population

related problems. She will need to educate others of the

necessity of being culturally savvy in the health care

environment in order to promote successful adhesion to the

program. In addition, the CNS will need to organize and

coordinate other members of the health care team to facilitate

the flow of the studies and manage the access to this CC program.

This field study has also global and encompassing

implications for the health care system as a whole. Cultural

competency can make Latino patients more confident and welcomed

in the health care system, this positive integration can

increasing the number of visitations and help prevent illnesses

108

from progressing or worsening, lowering health care costs on a

long term basis. Better communications with M.D.’s can also lead

to successful detection of disease in the early stages. The

implications for the Latino community are the improvement of

quality of life. The preservation of life and the well being of

the Latino community are proposed in this field study and mirrors

a global health care concern aimed at the improvement of life in

all communities; this program enables HCP to concentrate efforts

aimed at diminishing the cultural gap between Latino patients and

HCP providers in the United States to achieve well being.

Limitations of the field study

To make future improvements to this field study is necessary

to understand its limitations. Even though there is a wealth of

cultural competency studies available through several electronic

databases, the relevancy and accuracy of this study would gain

from having been conducted as a thesis. This field study did not

have the available funding and human resources to conduct its own

investigative research. It would have been preferred if data were

generated from specific Latino populations and the target

population concerning this study for more result accuracy and

109

relevancy.

Another limitation was the time allotted to the completion

of the project. This cultural competency course is expected to be

completed within one year. This is a limited time frame and not

sufficient time to investigate the effectiveness of the methods

used and the desired effects on the specific target populations.

Additional time would have ensured a longitudinal evaluation thus

generating more descriptive evaluating data. Important

information from these studies could have been: rates of re-

visitation from Latino patients prior and after the course

implementation, health outcome directly related to services after

program implementation, and hospital savings directly correlated

with Latino population segments. Lastly, with more time available

this program could have benefited from the input of professional

educators associated with similar cultural competency programs.

This was not possible due to the resource constraints encountered

in this study. Live input from educators or industry

professionals could have also clarified some flaws fond in the

project by determining if assumptions made for the project were

actually worthwhile to implement or if they offered any

110

significant results based on previous experiences from these

educational professionals.

Recommendations

The implementation of this cultural competency web program

to other hospitals and health institutions in addition to the

ones proposed in this study is one recommendation from the author

of this project. Hospital educational staff responsible for

implementing and documenting this CC programs could be

instrumental in contacting other health institutions and

facilitating the expansion of similar programs if evaluation

results are positive. Other independent educational institutions

could become potential centers for distribution for CC courses.

After development and refinement, this course could be packaged

and distributed to interested parties such as health educational

centers interested in providing cultural curricula. Consequently,

these centers could potentially produce entrepreneurial ventures

or marketing of cultural educational products or become

consultants to other institutions.

Another recommendation is the expansion of this CC program

to other areas of cultural integration and learning. Extensions

111

could be created to address areas such as: how to navigate the

health care in the United States. This could serve as a tool to

Latinos with poor comprehension of how health care issues are

addressed in the United States. This recommendation includes more

research to identify who are the Latinos at risk and what

populations suffer from these specific health care utilization

and navigation deficits.

Research in this area will need to be directed at the

assessment of current understanding on how Latinos perceive

health care, and what are the geographic areas where Latinos have

the most deficit when seeking health care in the United States.

More research is needed to evaluate if the largest problem areas

are in the regions of heavy migration or the remote areas where

few Latinos live. The assumption is that the unprivileged and

underserved areas with the most Latino population are the problem

areas but much research is needed to investigate high and low

population areas. This CC system can be more effective as the

roots of cultural deficit are uncovered.

It is also recommended that findings and results be

published and made available to institutions which could

112

potentially benefit from cultural competency program such as

this. Even though much research and studies can be found in the

cultural competency area, the large variety can be confusing and

not necessarily address the educational needs of certain groups.

A need to find cultural competency measurement tool is necessary.

Further research in the classification and validity of different

cultural competency courses is advised. Other research is also

necessary in the areas of diagnosis of Latino patients with the

creation of study cases and the area of mental health. Lastly the

creation of a national Latino health utilization database is

recommended for better access to information and uniformity,

facilitating the improvement of CC programs such as this.

Summary

This field study offers an educational option to the lack of

cultural awareness common in some health care settings where

Latino populations exist. This cultural competency program was

created to serve nurses, doctors and any HCP in seeding cultural

competency with Latinos. The program increases awareness of

differences in the Latino patient and provides comprehensive set

of solutions for discharge teaching, communication, assessment

113

and health instructions by utilizing evidence base research. The

objective is to create better communication and the elimination

of treatment and diagnosis errors creating more patient

satisfaction and safety for the Latino community in the United

States.

References

114

American Nurses Association. (2010). American nurses credentialing center:

Accreditation of continuing nursing education providers. Retrieved from:

http://www.nursecredentialing.org/ContinuingEducation/Accred

itation.aspx

and underserved/v021/21.1.sanchez.html

Anderson, L.M., Scrimshaw, S.C., Fullilove, M.T., Fielding, J.E.,

Normand, J. (2003). Culturally competent healthcare systems

a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(3),

0749-3797. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00657-8

Araiza, R., Klopf, M., & Kelley, F. (2005). Forces of change.

Nurse practitioner education and second language learning:

Using the Internet as a tool. Clinical Excellence for Nurse

Practitioners, 9(1), 41-47.

Bachman, S.S., Tobias, C., Master, R.J., Scavron, J., & Tierney,

K. (2008) A managed care model for Latino adults with

chronic illness and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies,

18(4), 197-204. doi: 10.1177/1044207307311304

Bacote, A.C., Bacote, J.C. (2009). Extending a model of cultural

competence in health care delivery to the field of health

115

care law. Journal of Nursing Law, 13(2), 36-44. doi: 10.1891/1073-

7472.13.2.36

Balslev, T., Grave, W.S., Muijtjens, A.M.M., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A.

(2005). Comparison of text and video cases in a postgraduate

problem-based learning format. Medical Education, 39, 1086-1092.

doi: 10.111/j.1365-2929.2005.02314.x

Barr, D.A., & Wanat, S.F., (2005). Listening to patients:

Cultural and linguistic barriers to health care access.

Stanford University Sociology Department, 37(3), 199-204. Retrieved

from http://www.stfm.org/fmhub/fm2005/March/Donald199.pdf

Betancourt, J.R., & Maina, A., (2007). Barriers to eliminating

disparities in clinical practice. In Betencourt, J.R., &

Maina, A., Eliminating Healthcare Disparities in America (pp. 83-97).

Retrieved from

http://www.springerlink.com/content/kj3373785tml138p/

Betancourt, J.R., Green, A.R., Carrillo, J.M., & Park, E.R.

(2005). Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key

perspectives and trends. Health Affairs, 24(2), 499-505. doi:

10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499

116

Betancourt, J.R., Green, A.R., Carrillo, J.M., Park, (2002).

Cultural competence and health care: Emerging frameworks and practical

approaches (Research Report No. 576). Retrieved from The

Commonwealth Fund website:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/betancourt_culturalc

ompetence_576.pdf

BlueCross BlueShield of Florida. (2007). Many cultures one goal your

health. Retrieved from BCBSF website:

http://www.bcbsfl.com/DocumentLibrary/AboutOurCompany/Divers

ityReport.pdf

California Board of Registered Nursing. (2008) Survey of RNs:

Data by Ethinicity. Available at:

http://www.rn.ca.gov/forms/xcelsius_ethnicity_export.shtml.

Accessed March 1, 2010

Campos, C. (2007). Addressing cultural barriers to the successful

use of insulin in Hispanics with type 2 diabetes. Southern

Medical Association, 100(8), 812-820. Retrieve from: http://0-

web.ebscohost.com.opac.sfsu.edu/

Cengage, G. (2002). Acculturation. In L. Breslow (Ed.),

Encyclopedia of public health (May 2006 ed.). Retrieved from

117

http://www.enotes.com/public-health-encyclopedia/acculturati

on

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Diabetes Public

Health Resource. National diabetes fact sheet: General information

and national estimates on diabetes in the United States

(2007). Retrieved from

http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2007.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Framework for Program

Evaluation, Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.

MMWR (2010);48(No. RR-11). Retrieved from:

http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Healthy Youth. Health

risks and disparities experienced by Hispanic youth. General information

and national estimates on Hispanic youth (2010). Retrieved

from:

http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/disparities/hispanic/hispani

c_disparities.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Minority

Health & Health Disparities. (2010). Eliminating racial and ethnic

118

health disparities. Retrieved from

http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/107.pdf

Cheng, E.C., Chen, A., Cunningham, W. (2007). Primary language

and receipt of recommended health care among Hispanics in

the United States. Society of General Medicine, 22 (2). 283-8.doi:

10.1007/s11606-007-0346-6

Cherrett, T., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., Dror, I.E.

(2009). Making training more cognitively effective: Making

videos interactive. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6),

1124-1134. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00985.x

Chevannes, M., (2001). Issues in education health professionals

to meet the diverse needs of patients and other service

users from ethnic minority groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing,

39(3), 290-298.

Chou, S., Liu, C. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based

virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective.

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65-76. Retrieved from:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/home

119

Christina C Wee, Russell S Phillips, Anna T R Legedza, Roger B

Davis, & et al. (2005). Health Care Expenditures Associated

With Overweight and Obesity Among US Adults: Importance of

Age and Race. American Journal of Public Health, 95(1), 159-65. 

Retrieved June 23, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document

ID: 777724131).

Coffman, M., Shobe, M., Dmochowski, J., & Fox, S. (2007). Health

care access and utilization among Latino immigrants. Hispanic

Health Care International, 5(2), 73-80. Retrieved from CINAHL Plus

with Full Text database.

Cohen, A.L., Rivara, F., Marcuse, E.K., McPhillips, H., Davis, R.

(2005). Are language barriers associated with serious

medical events in hospitalized pediatric patients? Journal of

the American Academy of Pediatrics, 166,575-579. doi:

10.1542/peds.2005-0521

Cook, D.A., Dupras, D.M., Thompson, W.G., Pankratz, V.S. (2005)

Web-based learning in residents’ continuity clinics: A

randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 90-97.

Retrieved from:

120

http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Abstract/2005/01000

/Web_Based_Learning_in_Residents__Continuity.22.aspx

Cox, E.D, Koscik, R.L., Olson, C.A., Behrmann, A.T., Hambrecht,

M.A., McIntosh, G.C., & Kokotailo, P.K., (2006). Carring for

the underserved blending service learning and a web-based

curriculum. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4), 342-349.

doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.024

Curran, V., Lockyer, J., Kirby, F., Sargeant, J., Fleet, L., &

Wright, D. (2005). The Nature of the Interaction Between

Participants and Facilitators in Online Asynchronous

Continuing Medical Education Learning Environments. Teaching

& Learning in Medicine, 17(3), 240-246.

doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1703_7.

Dentzer, S. (2010). The child abuse we inflict through child

obesity. Health Affairs. Advance online publication.

doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0152

Derntl, M.; Hummel, K.A.; , "Modeling context-aware e-learning

scenarios," Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2005.

PerCom 2005 Workshops. Third IEEE International Conference

121

on , vol., no., pp. 337- 342, 8-12 March 2005

doi: 10.1109/PERCOMW.2005.60

Escamilla, R.P., & Putnik, P. (2007). The role of acculturation

in nutrition lifestyle and incidence of type II diabetes

among Latinos. Journal of Nutrition, 137(4), 860-870.

ethnic. Medical-Glossary.com. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from

Medical-Glossary.com website: http://www.medical-

glossary.com/definition/ethnic.html

Frankel, B. (2010, April). The DiversityInc top 10 companies for

latinos. DiversityInc, Retrieved from

http://www.diversityinc.com/article/7452/The-DiversityInc-

Top-10-Companies-for-Latinos/Freeman J: Towards a definition

of holism. Br J Gen Pract

Glenn, F. (2006). Language barriers to health care in the United

States. The New England Journal of Medicine. 355(3). www.NEJM.org

Goode, T.D., Dunne, M.C., & Bronheim, S.M. (2006). The evidence base

for cultural and linguistic competency in health care (Commonwealth Fund

Pub No. 962). Retrieved from The Commonwealth Fund website:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/ Content/Publications/Fund-

122

Reports/2006/Oct/The-Evidence-Base-for-Cultural-and-

Linguistic-Competency-in-Health-Care.aspx

Gulas, Charles J. (2005).  Establishing the reliability of using

the Inventory for Assessing the process of cultural

competence among healthcare professionals with physical

therapy students. Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis

University, United States -- Missouri. Retrieved May 15,

2010, from Dissertations & Theses: The Humanities and Social

Sciences Collection.(Publication No. AAT 3185062).

Haviland, M.G., Morales, L.S., Dial, T.S., & Pincus, H.A. (2005).

Race/Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and satisfaction with

health care. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20, 195-203. doi:

10.1177/1062860605275754

Helms, J.E., Henze, K.T., Sass, T.L., Mifsud, V.A. (2006).

Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data

in counseling research. The Counsiling Psychologist.34(5), 630-660.

doi: 10.1177/0011000006288308

Hesse, B.W., Nelson, D.E., Kreps, G.L., Croyle, R.T., Arora,

N.K., Rimer, B.K., & Viswanath, K., (2005). The impact of

123

the internet and its implications for health care providers:

Findings from the first health information national trends

survey. Archive of Internal Medicine. 165(22), 2618-2624

Homestead Schools, Inc. (2004). In Homestead Schools, Inc. (Ed.),

Nursing an Hispanic Patient. Torrance, CA: Homestead Schools, Inc.

Hughes, K.H., & Hood, L.J., (2007). Teaching methods and an

outcome tool for measuring cultural sensitivity in

undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Trascultural Nursing, 18,

57-62. doi: 10.1177/1043659606294196

Hunt, L.M., Voogd, K.B., (2005). Clinica myths of the cultural

“other”: Implications for Latino patient care. Academic

Medicine, 80(10), 918-924. Retrieve from:

http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2007/06000

/Measures_of_Cultural_Competence__Examining_Hidden.5.aspx

Kaiser Permanente, News Center, Press Releases. (2006). Kaiser

Permanente health video targets Latinos (publication: August 31,

2006). Retrieved from

http://xnet.kp.org/newscenter/pressreleases/nat/2006/083106e

scogelasalud.html

124

Kripalani, S., Jones, J.B., Katz, M., & Genao, I. (2006). A

prescription of cultural competency in medical education.

Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(10), 1116-1120. doi:

10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00557.x

Ku, L., & Flores, G. (2005). Pay now or pay later: Providing

interpreter services in health care. Health Affairs,24(2), 435-

444. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.435

Landon, B.E., Hicks, L.S., O’Malley, A.J., Lieu, T.A., Keegan,

T., McNeil, B.J., Gaudagnoli, E. (2007). Improving the

management of chronic disease at community health centers.

New England Journal of Medicine, 356(9), 921-934. Retrieved from

http://www.nejm.org

Lanza, A.F., Armbrister, A.N., Flórez, K.R., & Aguirre, A.N.,

(2006). Towards a theory-driven model of acculturation in

public health research. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1342-

1346. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064980

Latinos. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from U.S.

Census Bureau website:

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_68188.htm

125

Leininger, M. (2002). Culture care theory: A major contribution

to advance transcultural nursing knowledge and practices.

Journal of Transcultural nursing, 13(3), 189-192. doi:

10.1177/1045602013003005

Lipson, J.G., & Desantis, L.A. (2007). Current approaches to

integrating elements of cultural competence in nursing

education. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 18, 10-20. doi:

10.1177/1043659606295498

Lorig, R.K., Ritter, P.L., Jacquez, A. (2005). Outcomes of border

health Spanish/English chronic disease self-management

programs. The Diabetes Educator, 31(401). 401-409. doi:

10.1177/0145721705276574

McDermott, R., O'Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to

sharing. Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 76-85. Retrieved

from http://mapule276883.pbworks.com/f/Overcoming%20cultural

%20barriers.pdf

Musolino, G.M., Babitz, M., Burkhalter, S.T., Harris, R., Ward,

R.S., Cantarini, S.C. (2009). Mutual respect in healthcare:

Assessing cultural competence for the university of Utah

126

interdisciplinary health sciences. Journal of Allied Health, 38, e54-

e62. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/

Nailon, R.E. (2006). Nurses’ concerns and practices with using

interpreters in the care of Latino patients in the emergency

department. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 17, 119-128. doi:

10.1177/1043659605285414

National Center for Cultural Competence (2010). Conceptual

frameworks. Retrieved May 19, 2010 from the NCCC website:

http://nccc.georgetown.edu/foundations/frameworks.html

Nerenz, D. (2005). Health care organizations’ use of

race/ethnicity data to address quality disparities. Health

Affairs, 24(2), 409-416. Doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.409

Ngo-Metzger, Q., Sorkin, H., Phillips, S., Greenfield, S.,

Massagli, P., Clarridge, B., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Providing

high-quality care for limited English proficient patients:

The importance of language concordance and interpreter use.

Society of General Internal Medicine, 22(2),324-303. doi:

10.1007/s11606-007-0340-z

Okie, S. (2007). Immigrants and health care at the intersection

of two broken systems. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(6).

127

Retrieved from:

http://0-content.nejm.org.opac.sfsu.edu/cgi/content/full/357

/6/525

Passel, J.S. & D’Vera Cohn. (2009). A portrait of unauthorized immigrants

in the United States (Report April 14, 2009). Retrieved from: Pew

Research Center Publications website:

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1190/portrait-unauthorized-

immigrants-states

Perez, D., Sribney, W.M., & Rodríguez, M.A., (2009). Perceived

discrimination and self-reported quality of care among

Latinos in the United States. Society of General Internal Medicine, 24,

548-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1097-3

Pérez-Escamila, R., & Putnik, P. (2007). The role acculturation

in nutrition, lifestyle, and incidence of type 2 diabetes

among Latinos. The Journal of Nutritition, 137,860-870.

Quintana, J.M., Gonzalez, N., Bilbao, A., Aizpuru, F., Escobar,

A., Esteban, C., ... Thompson, A. (2006). Predictors of

128

patient satisfaction with hospital health care. BMC Health

Services Research. 6(102). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-102

Rivers, P.A., & Patino, F.G. (2006). Barriers to health care

access for Latino immigrants in the USA. International Journal of

Social Economics, 33(3), 207-220. doi: 10.1108/03068290610646234

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Quality/Equality.

(2010). Glossary of health care quality terms. Retrieved

from: http://www.rwjf.org/qualityequality/glossary.

jsp

Ronda, H., Eduardo, O. (2005). Medication errors: Why they

happen, and how they can be prevented. American Journal of

Nursing, 105(3), 14-24. Retrieved from http://www.ovidsp.com

Sánchez, J.P., Kaltwassar, S., McClellan, M., Burton, W.B.,

Blank, A., Calderon, Y. (2010). Educational video tool to

increase syphilis knowledge among Black and Hispanic males

patients. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Undeserved, 21, 371-385.

Retrieved from:

129

http://0-muse.jhu.edu.opac.sfsu.edu/journals/journal_of_heal

th_care_for_the_poor_

Shaya, F.T., & Gbarayor, C.M., (2006). The case for cultural

competence in health professions education. American Journal of

Pharmaceutical Education, 70(6), 1-6. Retrieved from

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/

Shi, L., & Stevens, D. (2005). Vulnerability and unmet health

care needs: The influence of multiple risk factors. Journal of

Internal Medicine, 20(2), 148-154.  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-

1497.2005.40136.x

Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., Wisher, R. (2005). The

comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom

instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 3(59), 623-

664. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com

Sobralske, M.C. (2006). Community-based strategies to improve the

health of Mexican American men. International Journal of Men’s Health,

5(2), 153-171.

Sorkin, D.H., & Metzger, Q., Alba, I. (2010). Racial/Ethnic

discrimination in health care: Impact on perceived quality

130

of care. Journal of Internal Medicine. Advance online publication.

doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1257-5

Tan, Z., Beagan, B., Loppie, C., MacLeod, A., Frank, B. (2007).

Measures of cultural competence: Examining hidden

assumptions. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 548-557. Retrieved from:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/home

Tervalon, M. (2009, winter). At a decade: Centers of excellence

in culturally competent care. The Permanente Journal, 13(1).

Retrieved from:

http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/winter09/culturalcompet

ence.html

Tomey, A.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2001). Culture care: Diversity and

universality theory. In Y. Alexopoulos (Eds.), Nursing

Theorists and Their Work (pp. 501-526). St. Louis, Missouri:

Mosby.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Annual estimates of the resident population by

sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States. ( April 1, 2000 to

July 1, 2008) Retrieved from:

http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2008-

srh.html

131

Wilson, E., Chen, A., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., & Fernandez, A.

(2005). Effects of limited english proficiency and physician

language on health care comprehension. Journal of Internal

Medicine, 20,800-806. doi: 10.111/j.1525-1497.2005.0174.x

Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R., Nunamaker, J.F. (2005).

Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of

interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information &

Management, 43, 15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004

132

Appendix A

Budget

133

Appendix A: Budget

Web development BudgetExpenditures FTE Total

HoursIn Kind

Proposed Budget

Project general productionProject director FTE 0.28 600/year $2000 $9000Project coordinator FTE 0.46 480/year $1000 $5000Web-developmentSetup the server and coordinate the project

$300 $1,500

Create Photoshop imageof the website look-and-feel

$300 $2,700

Create HTML Web page templates (e.g., cut up the Photoshop file,create CSS and SSI files, and test in numerous browsers)

$800

Add content into each Web page

$500

Web Design Consulting $100 $300Setting up a Link Directory

$300

Web graphicsGraphics and photos $300 $750Animation $200 $350Flash creations $400Video ProductionNarrator $200 $300Script Writer $250

134

Talent $100 $400Editing $100 $400Camera Operator $100 $300Audio Operator $150 $150Production assistant $150 $150Content Total course modules $300 $1200Web course structure $700Booklet production $600Operational CostsOffice Supplies $150Other costs $200Partial Total $26,400In kind deductions $5,300Grand Total $21,100

Appendix B

Course Implementation Timelines

135

136

Appendix B: Course Implementation Timelines

Timeline for Cultural Competency Course implementationActivities Ja

nFeb

Mar

April

May June

July

Aug Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec

Grant writing proposals

X

Executive Director (ED) approves budget

X

ED hires content researcher specialist

X

Start production offlyers and companion booklet

X

ED hires online content course development specialist

X

ED hires web developer and graphic/photos production

X

ED establishes video production resources and initiate productionof clips

X

Staff will contact participating institutions

X

Conclusion of web site and online modules, booklets and flyers

X

Course implementation/introduction to institution and HCP

X

Course submission to the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

X

Evaluation tests X

137

and goal assessmentpre-testEvaluation tests and goal assessmentpost-test

X

Work Plan, Timeline, and Activities

Work Plan for Cultural Competency Course ProposalGoal: To increase cultural competency among health care professionals caring for Latino populations at the clinical site.

Objectives Activities ResourcesNeeded/Availab

le

Evaluation

Health care professionals will demonstrate interest in participating in the online cultural competencyprogram made available through their workplace

Under the orientation of CNS flyers or pamphlets will be dispersed inviting nurses to schedule online course

Flyers and pamphlets are needed

Pre/Posttest

Health care professionals will be introduced to cultural competency onlineprogram

Health care professionals will attend briefing on introductory of onlinecourse by CNS or volunteer organizer

Event coordinator hired to the project or volunteer

Pre/Posttest

Nurses will attend to Latino patients and demonstrate a improve

Nurses will observe cultural competency instructions and

Nurses willingto participatein trial and

Pre/Posttest

138

skill when interacting with LEP patients

implement it in the care of Latino patientand their families under the supervision of a instructor or project coordinator

available coordinator

Nurses will use engage in the use of online course for cultural competency and perform all modules

Nurses will be giving instructions and time allocation to perform the online course at their convenience

Volunteer of coordinator

Pre/Posttest

Latino patient will feel more satisfaction and understanding from health care services

Latino patients will participate in focus group studies

Volunteer or coordinator

Pre/Posttest

Nurses will display more satisfaction and a desire to be more cultural competent

Nurses will participate in focus groups studies

Volunteer of coordinator

Pre/Posttest

Work Plan, Timeline, and Activities

Tasks and Person(s) Resources Needed Start and

139

Subtasks Responsible Finish Dates

Hire project coordinator

Project director

Funds for salary, benefits, and candidates from universities or NGO’s with experience in teaching

Prior to three months of program start-up

Initiate content production and research material

Project director

Approved funds, research qualified candidates for hiring

On the first month of project calendar

Develop work planalong with institution’ staff CNS

Project coordinator

Prior contact and approval from participating institution. Budget approvaleffective

On the first month of project calendar

Initiate a plan for video production, hire production assembly

Project directorProject coordinator

Available professionalsVolunteers from BECA at SFSU

Prior to three months of program start-up

Initiate web production

Project director

Available fundsApproved web developer

Third month of project’s calendar

Begin production of companion booklet, hiring of content provider for booklet production

Project directorProject coordinator

Available professionals Prior to three months of program start up.

Begin implementation

Project directorProject coordinator

Completion of Web development, all content, booklet, organized project along with participating institution

At tenth month

140

Appendix C 1-3

Web-site sample diagrams

141

Appendix C-1: Web-site sample diagram

142

143

Appendix C - 2: Sample Web-site Video Presentation JCM

EDUCATIONAL VIDEO TREATMENT 352: Corporate Video Sample Treatment

Title: Latino health beliefs and practices

Audience: Health Care Providers

Medium: Online streaming video

Estimated Length: 20 minutes maximum

Objective: After viewing this video, students should

perceive cultural differences and beliefs

Latinos bring to the health care environment.

Students are expected to show increased

awareness and empathy to cultures other then

their own.

Key Messages: Latinos think differently than mainstream

America when it comes to health care and

health care treatments (Ku & Flores, 2005, p.

1)

Latino cultural behaviors can be learned to

facilitate communication in the health care

environments (Shaya & Gbarayor, 2006, p.3)

144

Learning to recognize and understand these

cultural differences can enhance HCP ability

to deal with Latinos (Betancourt & Maina,

2007, p.5).

The following is a description of Latino health beliefs and practices video

presentation. The percentages (given in parentheses) indicate the

amount of emphasis each section will have.

1. Introduction (10 percent)

This is the attention grabber and it should let the viewer know

what this video is all about. The piece opens with a long shot of

an undisclosed hospital. Cut to a shot of the admission desk, we

see emergencies coming through the door on a busy day. (dramatic

music) People are waiting at the lounge and some patients are

feeling ill or frustrated. A Latino family brings their daughter

with bruises to the head. Cut to flash back style shots of how

this accident took place as the Latino family hurriedly describes

the accident of their child who is badly bruised and bloody. The

parents repeat constantly in broken English “hit herself…hit

145

herself” with a heavy Spanish accent. The poor cultural

proficiency of HCP led them to understand the child was abused by

some family member as they assume that the parents were trying to

say that someone hit herself.

Following we see a sequence of shots which let the audience know

the parents are signing the custody of their two children.

Presenter on camera (American Latino): “If Lucia received

inappropriate care owing to the doctor’s misinterpretation , she

would not be alone”…narrator explains how this is a common

problem in emergency rooms and hospitals where misinterpretation

of cases takes place every day and wrong diagnosis can occur.

Graphics and shots of similar cases are presented displaying how

wrong diagnosis can result in serious injuries and deaths,

leading to millions of dollars in lawsuits. “A similar case

happened with a 12 year old boy in a Boston emergency room”…As

the narrator tell the story; photos of the new case are

introduced. “Problems such as this can be greatly diminished if

cultural competency is achieved among HCP (Glenn, 2006).

Presenter enters addressing the audience, graphic remain in

background. Music fades out. “In order to understand the Latino

146

patients we first must know to some degree, who are the Latinos?”

cut to a graphic with words: UNDERSTANDING THE LATINO PATIENT.

2. Understanding the Latino patient (15 percent)

Voice over: “Where do they come from? What is their culture like?

How do they think about their health? (Campos, 2007, p. 42)

Language can become an obvious barrier, challenge, and a point of

identity when working with Latino patients that it can sometimes

obscure other critical more subtle aspects of cross cultural

understanding”. Narration introduces the importance of being

culturally aware and how it can be an asset to health care

professionals (Fernandez, 2005, p. 14). (pictures and shots of

Latinos in their country of origin, Latinos in the United States,

Hispanic culturally related items). Cut to a sequence of small

interviews and statements edited in fast pace by several Latino

community members such as a University professor, street ice

cream vendor, doctor and a house wife. Ice cream vendor on

camera: “We’re a touching people. If you’re more than a handshake

distance from your customer or patient you’re too far” (Homestead

Schools, Inc, 2004, P. 13). In another shot the Latino doctor

147

says that in the early 80’s the American Diabetic Association had

nothing in the Latino diet and it was hard to make a plan for

Latinos but now things are changing (Campos, 2007, p. 7).

Statements should represent widely accepted views of Latinos have

about their cultural group. Narrator: “Let’s talk more in detail

about some common characteristics.

3. Common characteristics (20 percent)

The following is an introduction and brief explanation of

characteristic traits known and studied by cultural competency

educational courses. These items are: personalismo, confianza, respecto,

family structures, communication and social interaction, simapatia and time

orientation (appendix G, P. 104; Homestead Schools, Inc, 2004, P.

13). The following segment goes in detail over each of these

traits. Narrator will explain these items in the following order

or combine them when necessary. Using the same treatment adopted

throughout the video, this segment will combine on on-camera

narrator, voice over and a combination of pictures and graphics

providing a rich visual content aimed at maintaining interest

from the audience. Re-enactment scenes displaying interactions

148

concerning the items being explained will be shown at this point.

At the end of this segment the Narrator will introduce the next

section. Voice over: “But how does that apply to health care?

What are the key health concepts, Latinos bring to hospitals and

clinics when they seek help? (Ngo-Metzger et al., 2007, p.

2)...music up

4. Concepts of health for Latinos and related concerns among Latino patients (25 percent)

Music slows down, goes under. “Next we will talk about how

Latinos generally view health and illness (the hot and cold

principle), how do they view treatments (the concepts of the four

body humors) and some of the strategies that can use to better

communicate with the Latino patient (Homestead Schools, Inc,

2004, P. 13; appendix G, P. 104). More graphics and voice over

than footage are displayed in this segment. At the end of this

segment there will be a listing of related concerns and what are

the potential problems and health conditions HCP should be paying

attention in regards to Latino patients (Homestead Schools, Inc,

2004, P. 13). Voice over: “After learning health care concerns of

Latinos how do we promote health and prevent illnesses among

149

Latinos” segue into next segment (Kripalani, Jones, Katz & Genao,

2006, p. 6; Homestead Schools, Inc, 2004, P. 13).

5. Promotion and prevention (25 percent)

Music slows down, under, voice over. “In this segment we will

learn how to better promote health among Latinos by understanding

the importance and relevancy of family, traditional healing

methods, their views of western medicine and religious beliefs”

(Homestead Schools, Inc, 2004, P. 13) . Cut to a shot of a Latina

talking to a nurse. The narrator will explore why Latinos have a

difficulties using preventative medicine. Some of the common

statements Latinos use suggesting health is the result of luck or

fate and how to better approach these statements positively. Next

the video will explore how Latinos rely on family and friends and

its effects on treatment. Finally this segment will end with a

brief description of common botanical remedies used by Latinos

and what to look for in patients (Homestead Schools, Inc, 2004,

P. 13).

6. Conclusion (5 percent)

150

Music segue. Dissolve back to shot of narrator/presenter. He

addresses the camera: The conclusion is brief and specific.

Narrator on camera reiterates material just covered. Some

suggestions for better communications with Latinos, and some

bullet point graphics. Music up and video ends.

Appendix C - 3: Sample Web-site interactive video page

151

Created by Marcos Taquechel

152

Appendix D:

Communication model diagram

153

Appendix D: Communication model diagram

DEFINITION OF THECONSTRUCTS OF THE MODEL

The major constructs of the model The Process of CulturalCompetence in the Delivery of Healthcare Services are culturalawareness, cultural knowledge, cultural skill, culturalencounters, and cultural desire.

154

155

Appendix E:

Evaluation Methods

Appendix E: Evaluation Methods

156

All reproduction and use of this material will require permissionfrom J.Campinha-Bacote Phd., RN, Cs, CNS, CTN, FAAN

157

158

All reproduction and use of this material will require permissionfrom J.Campinha-Bacote Phd., RN, Cs, CNS, CTN, FAAN

159

All reproduction and use of this material will require permissionfrom J.Campinha-Bacote Phd., RN, Cs, CNS, CTN, FAAN

Appendix F:

Pre Test and Post test

160

Appendix F: Pre Test and Post test

1. In order to be classified as Hispanic, a person has to be speaking Spanish.

a) Trueb) False

2. Which of the following peoples are not considered Hispanic?a) Mexicansb) Argentinesc) Braziliansd) Dominica Republicans

3. A recent survey of Latino registered voters found that the term Hispanic is preferred to Latino.

a) Trueb) False

4. The description “liberal, older, and sometimes radical” is more typically applied to

a) Hispanicsb) Latinos

5. While dealing with Hispanic patients, you must respect theirprivacy. You’d be invading their privacy if you were closer than a handshake distance.

161

a) Trueb) False

6. Which of the following terms symbolizes the deferential behavior Hispanics exhibit towards other based on age, sex, social position, economic status, and authority?

a) La familiab) Respetoc) Personalismod) Confianza

7. Generally speaking, while addressing a Hispanic adult patient, which term should you use?

a) Usted (you)b) Tú (you)

8. All of the following statements about Hispanic culture are tree except:

a) Hispanics tend to avoid eye contact with authority figures

b) Hispanic patients tend to avoid disagreeing or expressing doubts to their health care provider with respect to the treatment they are receiving

c) When ill or injured, Hispanic people frequently consultwith other family members and often ask them to come along to medical visits

d) Hispanics prefer formal, institutional relationships topersonal relationships; they place their trust in the organization, the clinic or the hospital rather than the individual physician

9. Select the term that best describes confianza:a) Confidenceb) Private, confidentialc) Trustd) Respect

10.Hispanics generally have a longer life expectancy than non-Hipanic whites do

a) Trueb) False

162

11.Identify the leading cause of death for Hispanics of all agegroups

a) Accidentsb) Cancerc) Homicided) Heart disease

12.Select the true statement belowa) Hispanic adults have the lowest rates of smokingb) Hispanic teenagers have the highest rates of smoking

among all their peersc) Both of the aboved) None of the above

13.Which of the following groups has the lowest rate of breast-feeding their infants?

a) Hispanic womenb) Non-Hispanic white womanc) Non-Hispanic black woman

14.Which group tops the list in terms of unhealthy weight?a) Non-Hispanic whitesb) Mexican Americansc) Non-Hispanic blacks

15.A lifestyle issue facing the Hispanic community is excessivealcohol use. Data indicate that rates of alcohol use_________with acculturation among all U.S. Hispanic groups

a) Increaseb) Decrease

All reproduction and use of this material will require permissionfrom Nursing a Hispanic Patient, Homestead schools©

163

Appendix G:

Introductory Brochure

With permission of Homestead Schools, Inc. (2004).

164

165