W Fina icomi l Rep ico Co port ounty y - Wicomico County

Co

Evaluatthe

WDirec

Sa

oncep80

(410) 2

Fination of Ue Public

Radio

Pre

icomiMr. Da

ctor of EmWicom

411 Nayalisbury,

Pre

pts To1 Compa

Annapo

224-8911

[email protected]

l RepUpgradeSafety T

o System

epared for

ico Coavid Shipmergencmico Couylor Mill RMarylan

epared by

o Operss Way, S

olis, MD 21

- Fax (41

cepts2opncepts2op

port e OptionTrunked

m(s)

r:

ountypley cy Servicunty Road d 21801

:

rationsSuite 2171401

10) 224-85

s.com ps.com

ns for d

y ces

s, Inc.

591

.

CTO Final Report Prepared for Wicomico County Evaluation of Upgrade Options for the Public Safety Trunked Radio System(s)

Concepts To Operations, Inc.

Corporate Offices: 801 Compass Way, Suite 217, Annapolis, MD 21401-7813 – (410) 224-8911 – [email protected]

>> Page i <<

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 SECTION II EXISTING SYSTEM ................................................................................................. 6 2.1 EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION ........................................................................................ 6 2.1.1 ANALOG SYSTEM ISSUES ................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 SYSTEM SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT INVENTORY.......................................................... 8 2.1.3 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY ........................................................................... 9 2.1.4 PAGING SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 10 2.1.5 CONSOLES ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.6 FUTURE 800 MHZ ANALOG RADIO SYSTEM VIABILITY ............................................... 10 2.1.7 SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY IN NEW SYSTEM ................................................................. 11 SECTION III RADIO SYSTEM OPTIONS .................................................................................. 12 3.1 OPTION 1 – MARYLAND FIRST P25 PHASE II 700 MHZ SYSTEM ................................... 13 3.1.1 HISTORY OF MARYLAND FIRST ..................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 MARYLAND FIRST IN WICOMICO COUNTY ................................................................... 15 3.1.3 RF COVERAGE OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM ........................................................... 16 3.1.4 USE OF LEGACY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................ 19 3.1.5 COMPATIBILITY WITH NEW CONSOLES ....................................................................... 21 3.1.6 COSTS OF MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................. 22 3.1.7 LOGGING RECORDER ..................................................................................................... 22 3.1.8 PAGING SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 22 3.1.9 CROSS-PATCHING .......................................................................................................... 22 3.1.10 BACKHAUL AND REDUNDANCY ................................................................................... 23 3.1.11 COMMUNICATIONS SPACE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 25 3.1.12 ANTENNA REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 25 3.1.13 FCC LICENSES ............................................................................................................... 26 3.1.14 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY ....................................................................... 27 3.1.15 STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO CONTROL BOARD .................................... 29 3.1.16 SYSTEM GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................ 30 3.1.16.1 CRITICAL ISSUES WITH THE NEW CONTROL BOARD ........................................... 31 3.1.16.1.1 CHANNEL CAPACITY AND DEDICATED FUTURE EXPANSION ........................... 31 3.1.16.1.2 MEMBERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE RADIO CONTROL BOARD ..................... 31 3.1.16.1.3 FUTURE COSTS OF THE SYSTEM ......................................................................... 32 3.1.16.1.4 FUTURE SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE UPGRADES ........................................... 32 3.1.16.1.5 USE OF MARYLAND STATE REAL PROPERTY ..................................................... 32 3.1.17 CAPACITY PLANNING WITH MARYLAND FIRST ......................................................... 33 3.1.18 FREQUENCY SHARING WITH MARYLAND FIRST ...................................................... 33 3.1.19 MASTER SWITCH ACCESS WITH MARYLAND FIRST................................................. 35 3.1.20 SYSTEM MONITORING WITH MARYLAND FIRST ....................................................... 36 3.1.21 ENCRYPTION AND SECURITY OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM ................................ 36 3.1.22 FUTURE EXPANSION VIABILITY/P25 RADIO PLATFORM .......................................... 36 3.1.23 FUTURE COST OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM ......................................................... 37 3.2 OPTION 2 – MARYLAND FIRST AUGMENTED SYSTEM .................................................. 37 3.2.1 AUGMENTED SYSTEM COVERAGE (SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE) ............................ 38 3.2.2 AUGMENTED SYSTEM BACKHAUL ................................................................................ 43 3.2.3 TOWER ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 44 3.2.4 COST ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 44 3.3 OPTION 3 – NEW STANDALONE P25 PHASE II 800 MHZ RADIO SYSTEM .................... 45




>> Page ii <<

3.3.1 SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY IN 800 MHZ SYSTEM .......................................................... 47 3.3.2 VOICE QUALITY LEVEL ................................................................................................... 47 3.3.3 COVERAGE OF RADIO SYSTEM .................................................................................... 48 3.3.4 ENCRYPTION ................................................................................................................... 53 3.3.5 PAGING SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 53 3.3.6 SYSTEM CAPACITY ......................................................................................................... 53 3.3.7 SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................. 55 3.3.8 800 MHZ P25 PHASE II SCALABILITY ............................................................................. 56 3.3.9 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY ......................................................................... 56 3.3.10 DATA REQUIREMENTS (CURRENT AND FUTURE) .................................................... 57 3.3.11 TOWER ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 58 3.3.12 COST ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 58 3.4 OPTION 4 – 700/800 MHZ HYBRID P25 PHASE II DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEM .................. 58 3.4.1 LACK OF CHANNEL CAPACITY ...................................................................................... 59 3.4.2 COVERAGE OF RADIO SYSTEM .................................................................................... 60 3.4.3 SYSTEM LOADING (GRADE OF SERVICE) .................................................................... 61 3.4.4 FUTURE EXPANSION AND VIABILITY ............................................................................ 62 3.4.5 SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................. 62 3.4.6 SYSTEM CONTROL AND RELATIONSHIP TO MARYLAND FIRST ............................... 63 3.4.7 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY ......................................................................... 63 3.4.8 TOWER ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 65 3.4.9 COST ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 65 SECTION IV TOWER ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 66 4.1 ANSI/TIA 222 REV. G (SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY) ........................................................... 66 4.2 TOWER BREAKDOWN ........................................................................................................ 68 4.2.1 TOWER A – VIENNA STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION .......................................... 69 4.2.2 TOWER B – NAYLOR MILL .............................................................................................. 70 4.2.3 TOWER C AND TOWER C1 – PITTSVILLE (290’) ........................................................... 72 4.2.4 TOWER D AND TOWER D1 – POPLAR HILL (250’) ........................................................ 73 4.2.5 TOWER E AND TOWER E1 – SALISBURY MARYLAND STATE POLICE ...................... 75 4.2.6 TOWER F AND TOWER F1 – SALISBURY STATE HIGHWAY

ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................................................... 76 4.2.7 TOWER G AND TOWER G1 – FRUITLAND (250’) ........................................................... 77 4.2.8 TOWER H AND TOWER H1 – JOHNSON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 79 4.2.9 TOWER J OR TOWER J1 – MILESTONE (165’)/BENNETT SCHOOL (200)’ .................. 80 4.2.10 TOWER K OR TOWER K1 – MARDELA SPRINGS (200’) ............................................. 82 4.3 TOWER CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 83 SECTION V SYSTEM COST COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ................................................ 84 5.1 COST OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM (OPTION 1) .......................................................... 85 5.2 COST OF AUGMENTED MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM (OPTION 2) .................................. 87 5.3 COST OF STANDALONE 800 MHZ SYSTEM (OPTION 3) ................................................. 90 5.4 COST OF HYBRID 700/800 MHZ P25 PHASE II DIGITAL SYSTEM (OPTION 4) .............. 92 5.5 COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR NEW SYSTEM ................................................................. 97 5.6 COST CONTROL AND COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS ...................................................... 99 SECTION VI FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 100 6.1 A VIEW OF THE FUTURE .................................................................................................. 100 6.2 OPTION COMPARISONS .................................................................................................. 102 6.2.1 OPTION 1 – MARYLAND FIRST ..................................................................................... 103




>> Page iii <<

6.2.2 OPTION 2 – AUGMENTED MARYLAND FIRST 700 MHZ SYSTEM ............................. 106 6.2.3 OPTION 3 – NEW 800 MHZ P25 PHASE II STANDALONE RADIO SYSTEM ............... 109 6.2.4 OPTION 4 – 700/800 MHZ HYBRID P25 PHASE II RADIO SYSTEM ............................ 113 6.3 PROS AND CONS CHART OF SYSTEM OPTIONS.......................................................... 117 6.4 COST COMPARISON ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 130 6.5 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 130 6.6 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDAITONS ................................................................................ 132 APPENDIX A EXISTING EQUIPMENT INVENTORY APPENDIX B STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO CONTROL BOARD APPENDIX C STATE COST COMPARISON APPENDIX D PUBLIC SAFETY AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM BILL APPENDIX E MIGRATION ASSURANCE PROGRAMS Table of Figures Figure III-1 Maryland FiRST Projected Phasing (courtesy of Maryland FiRST).......................... 15 Figure III-2 Maryland FiRST Coverage (courtesy of Maryland FiRST) ....................................... 17 Figure III-3 Existing 700 MHz Coverage (in-building low-density) .............................................. 18 Figure III-4 Existing 700 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density) ............................................. 19 Figure III-5 Maryland FiRST Infrastructure Provided (courtesy of Maryland FiRST) .................. 20 Figure III-6 MIEMSS - Microwave Backhaul ............................................................................... 24 Figure III-7 Maryland FiRST – Fiber Backhaul in Salisbury ........................................................ 25 Figure III-8 Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Graph (courtesy of Tait Communications) .. 34 Figure III-9 Maryland FiRST System (courtesy of Maryland FiRST) ........................................... 35 Figure III-10 Existing 700 MHz Coverage (on-street) ................................................................. 38 Figure III-11 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (on-street) ............................................................... 38 Figure III-12 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (in-building low-density) ......................................... 39 Figure III-13 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (in-building medium-density) .................................. 40 Figure III-14 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density) ........................................ 41 Figure III-15 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density zoom) .............................. 42 Figure III-16 Proposed Augmentation of MIEMSS Microwave Backhaul .................................... 43 Figure III-17 Proposed Augmentation of Fiber Backhaul ............................................................ 44 Figure III-18 Proposed 800 MHz Sites Only ............................................................................... 46 Figure III-19 Analog vs. Digital (courtesy of M/A-COM) .............................................................. 47 Figure III-20 Existing 800 MHz Coverage (on-street) ................................................................. 49 Figure III-21 Proposed 800 MHz Coverage (on-street) ............................................................... 49 Figure III-22 Proposed 800 MHz Coverage (in-building low-density) ......................................... 50 Figure III-23 Proposed 800 MHz Coverage (in-building medium-density) .................................. 51 Figure III-24 Proposed 800 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density) ........................................ 52 Figure III-25 Existing 800 MHz Coverage (zoomed in-building high-density) ............................. 53 Figure III-26 Proposed 800 MHz Coverage (zoomed in-building high-density) .......................... 53 Figure III-27 Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Graph (courtesy of Tait Communications) 55 Figure III-28 Hybrid 700/800 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density) ...................................... 60 Figure III-29 Hybrid 700/800 MHz Coverage (in-building medium-density) ................................ 61 Figure IV-1 Rev. G 3-Second Basic Wind Speed Map ............................................................... 67 Figure IV-2 Towers ..................................................................................................................... 68 Figure IV-3 Vienna SHA 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ...................................................... 69 Figure IV-4 Naylor Mill 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ......................................................... 70 Figure IV-5 Naylor Mill 800 MHz (in-building high-density) ......................................................... 70 Figure IV-6 Pittsville 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ............................................................ 72




>> Page iv <<

Figure IV-7 Pittsville 800 MHz (in-building high-density) ............................................................ 72 Figure IV-8 Poplar Hill 700 MHz (in-building low-density) ........................................................... 73 Figure IV-9 Poplar Hill 800 MHz (in-building low-density) ........................................................... 73 Figure IV-10 Salisbury MSP 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ................................................ 75 Figure IV-11 Salisbury SHA 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ................................................ 76 Figure IV-12 Fruitland 700 MHz (in-building high-density) .......................................................... 77 Figure IV-13 Fruitland 800 MHz (in-building high-density) .......................................................... 77 Figure IV-14 Johnson DNR 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ................................................. 79 Figure IV-15 Milestone 700 MHz (in-building high-density) ........................................................ 80 Figure IV-16 Milestone 800 MHz (in-building high-density) ........................................................ 80 Figure IV-17 Mardela Springs 800 MHz (in-building high-density) ............................................. 82 Figure VI-1 Option 1 – Sites Only ............................................................................................. 103 Figure VI-2 Option 2 – Sites Only ............................................................................................. 106 Figure VI-3 Option 3 – Sites Only ............................................................................................. 109 Figure VI-4 Option 4 – Sites Only ............................................................................................. 113 Disclaimer All trademarks remain property of their respective holders, and are used only to directly describe the products or companies being referenced. Their use in no way indicates any relationship between Concepts To Operations, Inc. and the holders of said trademarks.




>> Page 1 <<

SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, Motorola announced that it would no longer support the 800 MHz analog system, which is in use as the primary communication system for Wicomico County. In June 2013, Wicomico County issued an RFP, entitled Evaluation of Upgrade Options for the Public Safety Trunked Radio System, with the purpose of determining whether to adopt utilization of the Maryland FiRST P25 Phase II 700 MHz system, which became available in Wicomico County in December 2013, or whether to build a new P25 Phase II 800 MHz digital system, which would be owned, operated, and controlled by Wicomico County. Concepts To Operations (CTO), a Maryland based public safety communications system consulting firm who is independent of any vendor, was hired in October 2013 to complete the analysis and provide a recommendation for a future radio system. In discussions with the senior staff of the county, and many of the first responders, Concepts To Operations determined that for any design of a new radio communications system for Wicomico County there are six (6) key elements against which all options must be judged. Those elements are:

(1) Channel capacity for current and future needs (2) Sustainability in a major weather event (3) In-building talk-out and talk-back with clarity (4) Comprehensive coverage for first responders (5) Redundancy with interconnections (6) Interoperability with other public safety agencies

In development of the overall design of a system, CTO has the following basic assumptions:

Channel Capacity – the ability of Wicomico County to provide voice and data from dispatcher to first responder without loss of voice quality (DAQ – Delivered Audio Quality), without loss of service to other operations, without busy signals, and without having to choose between sending information or not sending information due to system limitations. Sustainability – the ability of the communication system infrastructure to withstand a Category 2 hurricane direct hit in Ocean City (wind speeds 120 mph), as defined by ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G for critical structures (Class III). In-Building Coverage – the ability of a fully-geared firefighter, or any other first responder, to have continuous clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) in low-density, medium-density, and high-density buildings, throughout the county with a DAQ of 3.4 or better. Comprehensive Coverage – the ability to have clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) on-street and in-building, to include residential houses, office buildings, contemporary large multi-story buildings (office and apartment), hospitals, college campuses, county schools, and primary facilities, without the need for additional BDAs.




>> Page 2 <<

Redundancy – the ability of a complete communications system to be designed and operated without a single point of failure for communications between dispatch and field personnel. Redundancy in public safety communications systems is a method of insurance against failure of primary system functionality. Interoperability – the ability to communicate without loss of signal and without the need for each interoperability user to carry multiple radios operating on multiple frequency bands. In Wicomico County, this would include the City of Salisbury, Salisbury University, departments within the county, neighboring counties, State of Maryland agencies, State of Delaware agencies, and federal agencies.

As a result of the above system parameters, Concepts To Operations developed four (4) possible options for the new Wicomico County public safety communications system. Each of the options has substantive pros and cons for consideration. The options evaluated were:

Option 1 – Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system as the sole communications for the county

Option 2 – Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system and augmenting the system with one (1) new tower site

Option 3 – Development of a new standalone P25 Phase II compliant 800 MHz digital system with an Intra RF Subsystem Interface (ISSI) for interoperability

Option 4 – Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system

While each of the options detailed in this report are viable for the county, and have substantive pros and cons, Concepts To Operations believes that there is an option that best meets the needs of Wicomico County. On the basis of the best radio communication system design, with capacity for technology adoption and expansion over the next 10-15 years (providing comprehensive in–building coverage for first responders), Wicomico County should adopt Report Option 4. This choice provides the county with the most options, features, flexibility, and cost benefit. Option 4 is a:

700/800 MHz Hybrid P25 Phase II Digital Radio System The 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system would serve as an replacement to the existing 800 MHz system with added interoperability capabilities, additional channel capacity, and utilization of identified infrastructure from the Maryland FiRST system. Public safety communication systems are on the verge of major changes, both in their operation and in their function. Traditional systems have provided citizens the ability to call for assistance (voice or TTY) to a dispatcher who takes the information and determines what first responder personnel and apparatus are sent to an incident, based upon procedure and protocol. The next generation of radio communications will be required to handle incoming text, video, and pictures from the caller. The corresponding dispatcher will need to determine what data and information should be sent to the first responder, including:

3D schematics of building structures Exact room or office location in office and apartments buildings Past incident information at the specific location Suspect identification and pictures Medical information




>> Page 3 <<

Delivery of this data, and much more, will be possible through the new radio system. CTO believes that the county should have the option of providing its first responders with all available information, rather than be foreclosed by a less robust radio system or lack of channel capacity. The four (4) major commercial carriers (Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile) have created systems that allow for those private systems to interface with dispatch and for this information to be forwarded to hardened tablets or computers in the field. However, the lessons of the Boston Marathon present why CTO believes that the public safety utilization of commercial applications in emergency situations is not a viable alternative. At the very time when public safety entities in Boston most needed the information, all of the commercial carrier systems crashed due to the enormous flow of video and pictures taken at the scene by their own subscribers. CTO believes that, due to the expectations of the citizens of Wicomico County and their use and application of 4G technology (text, streaming video, pictures), emergency callers will expect to have the system accept their transmissions and re-transmit that information to first responders seamlessly. In addition, the FCC has recently focused on the need for text-to-911 (the first of the NG9-1-1 applications), encouraging PSAPs across the country to respond accordingly. The most important factor for the new radio system is to have access to sufficient channels for NG9-1-1 applications. CTO believes that the Wicomico system, as it now operates, will exceed its channel capacity in the near term. This will result in the need for additional channels, either in the 700 MHz or 800 MHz frequency band. Wicomico County’s experience in the Nextel rebanding process has shown that there are few additional 800 MHz channels currently available in the Wicomico County region. CTO recommends seeking access to and securing channels in the 700 MHz, from Maryland FiRST, and 800 MHz bands as a prudent course of action. A new 700/800 MHz hybrid radio system design would entail acquiring and implementing:

P25 Phase II compliant 700/800 MHz system 6 site (5 new towers and 1 upgrade) Simulcast IP-based system Microwave (MIEMSS) and fiber optic fully redundant backhaul Prime site location at Naylor Mill Road (new tower) ISSI interoperability features with Maryland FiRST/State of Delaware DAQ at a level of 3.4 or better for fully-geared firefighter in all buildings public and

private in Wicomico County Sufficient channel capacity for future expansion for NG9-1-1 features and

requirements Maintaining existing paging system Hardened communications infrastructure sustainable in major weather events Interoperability with Maryland state agencies, local jurisdictions and the State of

Delaware




>> Page 4 <<

The recommendation for the development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system over the other options available to Wicomico County were for the following key reasons:

The hybrid system provides Wicomico County options to expand its limited channel capacity utilizing either 700 MHz channels or 800 MHz channels.

The hybrid system utilizes the ISSI functions of the Maryland FiRST system for continued interoperability functions with the State of Delaware.

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to harden its infrastructure to ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G standards to sustain winds loads over 120 mph.

The hybrid system allows the county to maintain full control over the operations and upgrades of its system.

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to maintain its paging system and to control its future use.

The hybrid system allows the county to develop and maintain a robust in-building communication system which will be to provide a 3.4 DAQ or greater across all types of building structures in the county with 97% coverage/97% reliability.

The hybrid system will allow for the creation of a fully redundant backhaul system with the installation of an additional seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic cables and ten (10) new microwave links.

The hybrid system will allow the county to control expansion of the communications system and operations of non-emergency communications, including other county agencies currently not on the system.

The radio system that will be implemented as part of this system replacement will be quite different from radio systems in the past. Previously, the focus of a radio system has been the voice communications from the PSAP to the first responder, and vice-versa. In the future, the radio system will be required to provide: (1) voice to/from first responders; (2) transmission of x, y, z, locational data to first responders; (3) transmission of building and past incident information to first responders; (4) transmission of streaming video and pictures of incidents to first responders before their arrival on scene; (5) incident tracking of all first responders on scene; and (6) data and information which is only now in the conception stage. This type of future radio system needs to be flexible (hardware and software), yet be robust enough to have capacity to provide first responders with the latest technology and without being limited by bandwidth. Option 4 is fully detailed and discussed in Section 3.4 of this report. In addition to the recommendations made under the scope of this report, Concepts To Operations would also recommend the following:

Creation of a public safety communications radio shop facility, where all of the communications equipment can be maintained and repaired. The facility should also have vehicle installation and repair facilities for mobile units used by first responders

Upgrade of the base phone infrastructure from PSTN to an IP-based network (priority to the dispatch operations for both the sheriff and PSAP facilities)

Development of a cloud-based regional data system utilizing all available information for public safety first responders

Enforcement of the existing public safety radio amplification system legislation, which was adopted and approved, but has not been enforced by the permit department as a requirement for new construction in the county (the interview of the Wicomico County




>> Page 5 <<

Director of Planning revealed the lack of implementation of the legislation) With the implementation of the new radio system, a reevaluation of the channel

utilization policy should be undertaken to ensure effective use of the public safety channels

Construction of new county owned towers provides potential for colocation of commercial carriers with potential revenue stream from each tower for cost offset




>> Page 6 <<

SECTION II EXISTING SYSTEM

2.1 EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION

Wicomico County has an estimated population of 100,647 citizens and encompasses 399.79 square miles, of which 22.62 square miles is water, according to the 2010 Census (updated with 2013 population data). Concepts To Operations, Inc. (CTO) performed interviews, meetings, and site visits during the month of November to obtain inventory and system information on the current three (3) site, trunked, simulcast 800 MHz analog system that is currently utilized in Wicomico County. CTO held meetings/interviews with the following agencies and personnel:

Mr. David Shipley – Director of Emergency Services, Wicomico County Mr. Bill Nutter – Radio Systems Manager, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Mr. Chris Hopkins – Chief Communications Supervisor, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Mr. David Pollitt – Supervisor & Trainer, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Mr. Kyle Cole – Dispatcher and Volunteer Firefighter, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Ms. Monica Dietz – Communications Operator, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Ms. Gina Woods – Shift Supervisor, Emergency Services, Wicomico County Ms. Tammy Croswell – 9-1-1 Data Technician, Emergency Services Wicomico County Mr. Tom Bowden – Specialist, Department of Information Technology, Wicomico County

(President, Fire Chiefs Association) Capt. Tod Richardson – Sheriff’s Department, Wicomico County Lt. Rich Wiersberg – Sheriff’s Department, Wicomico County Ms. Sara Bey – Communications Supervisor, Sheriff’s Department, Wicomico County Mr. David Fitzgerald – Director, Humane Society/Animal Control, Wicomico County Mr. Terry Jones – Maintenance Supervisor, Salisbury-Ocean City-Wicomico

Regional Airport Mr. Danny Drew – Health Department, Wicomico County Mr. Jack Lenox – Director of Planning, Wicomico County Mr. David Church – Environmental Planner, Wicomico County Mr. Lee Beauchamp – Director of Public Works, Wicomico County Lt. Jason Yankalunas – Shift Commander, Salisbury Police Department Mr. Robert Perry – Quartermaster (Retired), Salisbury Police Department Mr. Mike Bussacca – Dispatcher, Salisbury Police Department Deputy Fire Chief John Tull – Salisbury Fire Department Mr. Michael Moulds – Director, Salisbury Public Works Lt. Joel Davies – Salisbury University Police Department Mr. John Psota – City Manager, City of Fruitland Chief Phillips – Chief of Police, Fruitland Police Department Chief Robin Townsend – Fruitland Fire Department Mr. Ray Lehr – Director of Maryland FiRST Implementation Team Mr. Charles Bryson – Consultant to Maryland FiRST Mr. Drew Van Dopp – Maryland Broadband Volunteer Fire Chiefs – Meeting with Fire Chiefs Association members




>> Page 7 <<

2.1.1 ANALOG SYSTEM ISSUES

While the on-street coverage is generally accepted as good, Concepts To Operations identified specific coverage issues during interviews that suggest that the on-street coverage for users varies widely. Wicomico County Emergency Services interviews identified the following coverage issues with the current radio system:

• Coverage issues on the western portions of the county which are bordered by the Nanticoke River, to include some parts in the center of the county

• The western part of the county experiences out of range issues • The eastern part of the county also experiences out of range issues • Very little in-building coverage

The Wicomico County Sheriff’s Department has identified the following coverage issues during interviews:

• Countywide in-building coverage • Countywide on-street coverage (talk-out and talk-back) • Reception issues due to rain and wind • Reception issues with portables in the Sharptown area • No coverage in Wetipquin • Often no coverage in the Nanticoke area – to end of Nanticoke Road • Poor reception (talk-out and talk-back) in and around the Fruitland City limits • Poor coverage in the Dagsboro Road area • Poor coverage east of Route 346 • Interoperability issues between the Wicomico SWAT, Worcester County Sheriff,

Somerset County Sheriff, and MSP Wicomico Investigation Bureau (WIB) The Salisbury Fire Department identified the following coverage issues:

• Dead spots with the radio system, which are primarily at Salisbury University • Below grade areas, such as basements

The Fruitland Police Department has advised:

• Coverage issues with portables, but no specific areas were identified • Transmissions are not clear occasionally

The Fruitland Fire Department reports:

DAQ below 3.0 in the fire department for portables and pagers Additional areas that have no coverage are Route 13/Business Route 13

intersection, along the railroad tracks, and Route 13/Cedar Ln intersection In-building coverage is a problem throughout the response area




>> Page 8 <<

Although Salisbury University is not operating on the current county radio system, their issues become relevant during interoperability events and service calls to county law enforcement and fire. The Salisbury University Police Department purchased a 4-channel UHF radio system with two (2) base stations within the last five (5) years, which is used by all departments at the university and with approximately 249 users (emergency and non-emergency) on the system. Due to the lack of in-building coverage provided by the county’s existing analog system, Salisbury University elected to purchase its own system prior to Maryland FiRST’s implementation. Because of this separate system, some of the Salisbury University officers carry two (2) radios, (UHF and 800 MHz) with the shift supervisor carrying three (3) radios (third radio is a Salisbury Police Department portable). Other state universities may be joining the Maryland FiRST system when their communication systems need to be upgraded or replaced. Due to the existing analog system’s inability to provide comprehensive in-building coverage, the board of education, in an effort to improve safety, implemented in-building Bi-Directional Amplifier (BDA) systems in several of their schools. Peninsula Regional Medical Center took a similar approach to improving safety in their facility with the installation of a comprehensive BDA system. Additional BDAs were installed in several individual county government facilities where in-building communications was critical. 2.1.2 SYSTEM SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

Wicomico County’s inventory of subscriber equipment is composed of a variety of Motorola portable and mobile radio models. The current system has 1,667 portable radios and 658 mobile radios. The Wicomico County Board of Education comprises nearly 31% of the radios in operation, with law enforcement comprising 17%, and fire/EMS comprising nearly 33%. The entire detailed inventory, as provided by the county, is in Appendix A. Some of the radios have been upgraded in the normal course of business by the communications division. Other radios have been upgraded utilizing funds from the Nextel 800 MHz rebanding effort. Still other radios have been provided by various other methods (interoperability partners). As part of CTO’s review, the county provided CTO with the latest inventory of equipment for our evaluation and consideration (as of March 1, 2014). CTO notes that inventory changes on a daily basis as units are put in service, taken out of service for repairs, or used for spare parts. Wicomico County is currently undergoing the last stage of the 800 MHz rebanding of a number of its units under the FCC order for retuning or replacement of mobiles and portables due to the interference that Nextel caused to public safety users. The following is a full list of agencies that utilize mobile or portable radios that are owned and/or maintained by the Emergency Services Division:

Wicomico County Volunteer Fire Departments Fire/Police for Wicomico County Fruitland Police Department Wicomico County Department of Corrections County Emergency Management Wicomico County Sheriff’s Department Humane Society Department of Public Works Perdue – Zion Church Road processing facility




>> Page 9 <<

Salisbury-Ocean City-Wicomico Regional Airport Wicomico County Board of Education Health Department Wicomico County Holly Center Deer’s Head Hospital Center Salisbury University Wicomico County Emergency Services Salisbury Mutual Assistant Group (SMAG) Solid Waste/County Roads Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism

With the implementation of the new radio system it is expected that a number of county agencies, which currently do not operate of the analog system, will be provided radios and access to communications, resulting in better efficiencies across the entire county government. Concepts To Operations has reviewed the inventory and classified the mobiles and portables into several useable categories for the purposes of this report. Concepts To Operations’ evaluation of existing radios was assessed for compatibility (either operating on 700/800 MHz digital or capable of being programmed using flash programming for upgrade to 700/800 MHz digital) or non-compatibility (incapable of either operating on or being upgraded to operations on the 700/800 MHz digital system) for the purposes of this report. Those categories are:

Mobiles which are compatible 20Mobiles which are non-compatible 567Portables which are compatible 168Portables which are non-compatible* 1,375Encrypted units 0

*Board of education portables total 506

2.1.3 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY

Wicomico County’s geographic area is 399.74 square miles. In addition to their service area, law enforcement and fire agencies within Wicomico County have mutual-aid agreements and response areas outside the county. Mutual-aid response requires interoperability with neighboring counties, law enforcement, fire departments, EMS, emergency management, and MSP.

Maryland State Police (MSP) City of Salisbury Dorchester County Somerset County Worcester County MIEMSS Delaware State Police Town of Ocean City Sussex County, Delaware




>> Page 10 <<

Salisbury University Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Department of Natural Resources Maryland Emergency Management Talbot County

This is currently accomplished by the use of multiple radios or programmed interoperability channels. 2.1.4 PAGING SYSTEM

The Salisbury Fire Department and all of the Wicomico County volunteer fire departments utilize a combination of approximately 700 Minitor II, Minitor II, Minitor IV and Minitor V pagers, which operate on the current VHF FCC licenses issued to either Wicomico County or the Salisbury Fire Department. Discussions with senior management of both the fire department and the communications division have indicated that the existing VHF paging system must be maintained to alert fire/EMS first responders, regardless of any new communications system selected and implemented. CTO notes that a key concern over the existing paging system is the FCC licenses. The licenses issued allow for 350 watts of full power operation at the selected tower locations. This power level is no longer allowed under FCC transmission rules. These licensed operations have been grandfathered by the FCC to continue to operate at the 350-watt level. CTO notes that should any changes be made to the current licenses (i.e., moving tower location over 50 feet), the FCC may require the licensee to comply with current rules, dropping the ERP to 100 watts and forcing an increase in tower locations. 2.1.5 CONSOLES

The Wicomico County Emergency Services and Wicomico County Sheriff’s Department utilize Motorola Gold Elite consoles, installed in 2001. Due to age, the consoles will not be compatible with any new system replacement. Regardless of which option is selected, replacement of all of the consoles will be required. The replacement of the consoles should include the consoles in both the dispatch center and sheriff’s department. Should a Public Safety Communications Radio Shop be created (see recommendations), an additional console would need to be acquired for that facility. 2.1.6 FUTURE 800 MHZ ANALOG RADIO SYSTEM VIABILITY

The existing county 800 MHz analog radio system is at the end of its life cycle (i.e., Motorola will no longer support the software and/or hardware for the system). Additionally, spare parts (secondary market) are becoming scarce after the announcement by Motorola of the end of life cycle. With the system at its end of life cycle, replacement parts are hard to find and there is no future expansion or upgrade viability for the current system. Should a portion of the system break or cease to function, there may be no way to repair or replace the part(s) to return the system to operation. This result is unacceptable in the public safety communications arena. In 2013, the FCC directed that all public safety communications on the VHF/UHF frequency band (150 MHz to 512 MHz) narrowband to 12.5 kHz channels. CTO believes that it is likely that the FCC will again mandate that public safety entities narrowband their existing operations from 12.5 kHz to 6.25 channels. This unfunded mandate would leave many agencies that have not moved to P25 systems to be operating in violation of FCC rules. It is expected that this future




>> Page 11 <<

mandate from the FCC will occur no later than 2018, with implementation no later than 2022. CTO notes that all P25 Phase I radio systems are narrowbanded to 12.5 and Phase II systems are narrowbanded to 6.25 kHz channels. 2.1.7 SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY IN NEW SYSTEM

During interviews, Concepts To Operations solicited users for desired features and functions in a new system. A majority of the users requested strong uninterrupted on-street coverage and robust and uninterrupted in-building coverage (CTO concurs), the elimination of interoperability issues (CTO concurs), and an infrastructure which can withstand a substantial weather event like Hurricane Sandy (CTO concurs). In addition, the most critical element noted is the need for sufficient channels and the capacity of the system to implement mandated and desired NG9-1-1 features for the citizens of the county. Elements of a new radio system, which CTO believes are critical, include:

P25 Phase II radio system Sufficient channels to implement NG9-1-1 features, when available Priority channel option(s) Administrative control over the operation and future of the radio system Ability for portable talkgroups and tactical channels A system to be user friendly, easy access and have tactical channels Sustainability of system infrastructure in a major weather event (120 mph) Comprehensive coverage for first responders of DAQ 3.4 or better (in-building) System and communication redundancy (microwave and fiber optics) Encryption capability for law enforcement Seamless interoperability




>> Page 12 <<

SECTION III RADIO SYSTEM OPTIONS The new radio system, which Wicomico County will be implementing as part of this evaluation and upgrade process, will be quite different from radio communication systems in the past. Previously, the focus of a radio system has been the voice communications from the PSAP to the first responder and vice-versa. In the future, the radio system will be required to provide: (1) voice to/from first responders; (2) transmission of x, y, z locational data to first responders; (3) transmission of building and past incident information to first responders; (4) transmission of streaming video and pictures of incidents to first responders before their arrival on scene; (5) incident tracking of all first responders on scene; and (6) data and information which is only now in the conception stage. This type of next generation radio system needs to be flexible (hardware and software), yet be robust enough to have capacity to provide responders with the latest technology and without being limited by bandwidth. Wicomico County serves as a unique and pivotal point for public safety on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Primary drive routes to the shore and corresponding evacuation points from the shore bisect the county. In addition, Peninsula Regional Medical Center is one of only three (3) of the Eastern Shore’s hospital facilities, and is located in the center of the county. The county seat, the City of Salisbury, is the manufacturing, industrial, commercial, and educational center of the Eastern Shore. Each of the roles that the county plays adds to the responsibility that the county holds for providing public safety services, not only to the county citizens, but to the neighboring counties and to citizens from across the state on their way to enjoy the beaches of Ocean City. In the design and development of a new radio communication system, Concepts To Operations recommends keeping the following key points in mind:

(1) Channel capacity for current and future needs (2) Sustainability in a major weather event (3) In-building talk-out and talk-back with clarity (4) Comprehensive coverage for first responders (5) Redundancy with interconnections (6) Interoperability with other public safety agencies

In development of the overall design of a system, CTO has the following basic assumptions:

Channel Capacity – the ability of Wicomico County to provide voice and data from dispatcher to first responder without loss of voice quality (DAQ – Delivered Audio Quality), without loss of service to other operations, without busy signals, and without having to choose between sending information or not sending information due to system limitations.

Sustainability – the ability of the communication system infrastructure to withstand a Category 2 hurricane direct hit in Ocean City (wind speeds 120 mph), as defined by ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G for critical structures (Class III). In-Building Coverage – the ability of a fully-geared firefighter, or any other first responder, to have continuous clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) in low-density, medium-density, and high-density buildings, throughout the county with a DAQ of 3.4 or better.




>> Page 13 <<

Comprehensive Coverage – the ability to have clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) on-street and in-building, to include residential houses, office buildings, contemporary large multi-story buildings (office and apartment), hospitals, college campuses, county schools, and primary facilities, without the need for additional BDAs. Redundancy – the ability of a complete communications system to be designed and operated without a single point of failure for communications between dispatch and field personnel. Redundancy in public safety communications systems is a method of insurance against failure of primary system functionality. Interoperability – the ability to communicate without loss of signal and without the need for each interoperability user to carry multiple radios operating on multiple frequency bands. In Wicomico County, this would include the City of Salisbury, Salisbury University, departments within the county, neighboring counties, State of Maryland agencies, State of Delaware agencies, and federal agencies.





Option 4 – Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system 3.1 OPTION 1 – MARYLAND FIRST P25 PHASE II 700 MHZ SYSTEM

The RFP for Evaluation of Upgrade Options for the Public Safety Trunked Radio System was released by Wicomico County on June 25, 2013; it requested a thorough analysis and review of the Maryland FiRST system (700 MHz). This section of the report will discuss the design and management of the Maryland FiRST system, including the implemented design and operation of the Maryland FiRST system in Wicomico County, which began operation on or about February 1, 2014. CTO is aware that a number of local jurisdictions, in an effort to save taxpayers’ funds, have contemplated giving, or already have given, up their individual public safety radio systems and opted onto the Maryland FiRST system as their primary communication system. CTO has evaluated that option in this section for Wicomico County. CTO notes that, while suitable for some jurisdictions, the Maryland FiRST system may not be suitable for others. CTO will assess the impact on the county operations, as required by the SOW, and will provide a definitive recommendation as to whether Wicomico County should adopt the Maryland FiRST system as its primary public safety communications system. 3.1.1 HISTORY OF MARYLAND FIRST

The conception of a unified Maryland public safety communication system has been a goal and discussion for more than 30 years, initiated in the 1980s with the goal of a statewide 800 MHz communication system. During the mid-1990s, an “infrastructure working group” was formed to




>> Page 14 <<

begin the process of building a statewide communications network for use by public safety entities. The working group began focusing on the development of a 700 MHz system (consistent with discussions with the FCC for reallocation of a portion of the 700 MHz band for public safety utilization). With the impact of attack of 9/11 and the creation of FirstNet, the move toward a unified emergency communication system for first responders on all levels has become more pronounced. In 2003, the “infrastructure working group" became more formalized by the creation of the public safety communication interoperability Governance Working Group (GWG). The GWG’s efforts resulted in the release, in 2005, of the Maryland Statewide Communication Interoperability Plan (SCIP). On July 10, 2008 by executive order of Governor Martin J. O’Malley, the State Interoperability Committee comprised of 34 members of state and local governments began the task of assessing what type of communications system should be developed to meet the Homeland Security and public safety needs of the citizens of the State of Maryland. While the initial committee had members of the Maryland Association of Counties (MACO) and the Maryland Municipal League (MML), it was in large part comprised of state governmental agency representatives. The executive order formally established the Maryland State Interoperability Executive Committee (SIEC) and its Practitioner Steering Committee (PSC). The committee was tasked with implementation of the SCIP, which embodied the goals for statewide communications utilizing the 700 MHz frequency band. Membership of the committee was by executive order and in large part comprised by representatives of Maryland governmental agencies, such as the following:

Maryland State Police (MSP) Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA) Maryland Institute of Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS) Maryland Emergency Management Association (MEMA) Maryland Department of Environment Maryland Department of Licensing and Regulation Maryland Department of Public Safety and Corrections Services

The 2005 statewide interoperability plan viewed the Maryland 700 MHz system as a standalone system (state agency use only); however, it also provided access to the system for local counties and agencies via mutual-aid channels. The system, as planned, was not designed nor intended to serve as a replacement system for local jurisdictions. In 2008, the state issued an RFP requesting proposals for the design and implementation of a statewide system (for state agencies). The RFP was issued for competitive bid on November 17, 2010, a contract for the implementation of a statewide P25 Phase II 700 MHz system for use by state agencies and the Maryland State Police was executed. The system would become known as Maryland FiRST. Figure III-1 illustrates the five (5) phase build out of the Maryland FiRST system.

Corpor

Figure III-1

3.1.2 MA

Consisteincluded Pittsville,(Motorolabegan asystem creport wa The MarCounty in

rate Offices: 801

1 Maryland FiR

ARYLAND F

ent with the in Phase 2

, Poplar Hilla Solutions) series of a

covering Wicas in progres

ryland FiRSnclude:

Use of MI Placemen Placemen Placemen Placemen Placemen Placemen Placemen

Evaluat

Compass Way,

RST Projected

FIRST IN WIC

phased-in of the plan. l, Salisbury on October

acceptance comico Couss.

ST system i

IEMSS micront of 3 antennt of 3 antennt of 3 antennt of 3 antennt of 3 antennt of 3 antennt of 3 anten

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

d Phasing (cou

COMICO CO

constructionConstructioMSP, and

r 1, 2013. Betesting and

nty was acc

nfrastructure

owave as thnnas on the 3nnas on the 2nnas on the 2nnas on the 2nnas on the 2nnas on the 3nnas on the 3

CTO Final Rde Options for

To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 15 <<

urtesy of Mary

OUNTY

n plan for Mons on the WSalisbury S

eginning Octd drive-testscepted by th

e componen

e primary ba330’ Fruitlan200’ Johnso280’ Pittsville270’ Poplar 200’ Salisbu330’ Salisbu300’ Vienna

Report Prepr the Public S

ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

yland FiRST)

Maryland FiRWicomico siteSHA) were ctober 1, 201s of the syhe state late

nts servicin

ackhaul nd tower on DNR towee tower Hill tower

ury MSP towury SHA towe

SHA tower

pared for WSafety Trunke

24-8911 – cto@c

RST, Wicomes (Fruitlandcompleted b3, the Marystem. The

e December

g the citize

er

wer er

Wicomico Coed Radio Syst

concepts2ops.co

mico Countyd, Johnson Dby the contrland FiRSTMaryland F

r 2013, while

ens of Wico

ounty tem(s)

om

y was DNR, ractor team

FiRST e this

omico




>> Page 16 <<

In addition, each of the six (6) tower sites located in Wicomico County were connected for communications backhaul purposes as follows:

Site Location Backhaul Fruitland fiber only Salisbury MSP fiber and microwave Salisbury SHA fiber and microwave Pittsville microwave only Johnson DNR microwave only Poplar Hill microwave only

CTO notes that system redundancy was not considered in the construction and linkage of the Maryland FiRST sites. Their primary concern was getting a system up and running covering the population for on-street communications for the Maryland State Police and various Maryland state agencies Maryland FiRST placed new shelters in the existing compounds and full backup generator power was installed at each to meet the requirements for backup power under 47 CFR Part 12 Section 12.2. CTO notes that the directive from the state was to use as much of the existing state infrastructure (MEIMSS, SHA, and MSP towers) as possible, saving funds from tower construction. The older towers were designed and installed with a wind load ratings of 85 mph, in accordance with ANSI/TIA 222.2 Rev. F. Due to the need to cover portions of Somerset County, the state added a tower in Fruitland and connected it by fiber not MEIMSS microwave. 3.1.3 RF COVERAGE OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM

The Maryland FiRST system, as it was designed and is being built, was specifically geared toward providing a unified on-street system to all of the state agencies. The initial design and implementation did not contemplate the local entities operating on the system, other than as interoperability partners. As such, when designing the statewide system Motorola Solutions did not consider county jurisdictional boundaries. The Maryland FiRST system design provides good coverage for the Maryland State Police and state agencies as the prime users with questionable coverage for local first responders. The system allows all state agencies to communicate on one system anywhere in the state and from end-to-end in the state without multiple radios. The Maryland FiRST system was designed to provide on-street portable coverage with in-building coverage as incidental to the primary design. Figure III-2, as provided by Maryland FiRST, shows that the Maryland FiRST system provides acceptable on-street portable coverage (yellow) and limited in-building coverage (red) in the areas which CTO has identified that Wicomico County first responders need in-building coverage the most. The Motorola designed and implemented system, while providing 95% coverage with 95% reliability for on-street cannot be guaranteed to provide any level of in-building coverage. The in-building coverage, noted in the projected coverage by Maryland FiRST, is typically limited to a radius of approximately 2.0 miles from the tower location and is incidental to the coverage being provided on-street by the system. The in-building coverage is also limited by the location of buildings vis-à-vis the tower antennas.

Corpor

On Februsystem inresults opropositiobetter thwould noconstant cannot gWicomico Figure III-2

As part othe Marycoveragethe Motobuilding p

OLMH

rate Offices: 801

uary 27, 201n those build

of the spot con that in-buan expected

ote that its svoice comm

guarantee too County.

2 Maryland FiR

of the analysyland FiRSTe. CTO’s theorola contracpenetration a

On-street -95Low-densityMedium-denHigh-density

Evaluat

Compass Way,

14, Conceptsdings in thecheck, withouilding coverd, providingpot check d

munications op quality v

RST Coverage

sis for this reT system uteoretical moct. Conceptsand of DAQ

5 dBm y (residentiansity (commy (hospitals

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

s To Operatcounty that

out access trage by the ng some in-bid not includand was do

voice transm

e (courtesy of

eport, CTO tilizing the deling took s To Operatloss. CTO e

al wood builmercial cindes and contem


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 17 <<

tions undertot are servedto the entirenew Marylan

building covede an analysone with no fmission for f

f Maryland FiR

has performsame systeinto accountions additioevaluated sig

ldings) -83 erblock buimporary bu


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ook a spot cd with BDAs e Maryland nd FiRST 70erage in mosis of DAQ lefoliage on thfirst respond

RST)

med theoreticem design fnt additional onal factors gnal strengt

dBm ildings) -77uildings) -65


24-8911 – cto@c

check of the on the exis

FiRST syste00 MHz systost buildingsevels and whe trees. Likders in build

cal RF covefor on-streetfactors thatincluded a

h loss as fol

dBm 5 dBm


concepts2ops.co

Maryland Fsting systemem, supporttem is perfors checked.

was not doneke Motorola, dings throug

rage modelit and in-but were not pclassificatio

llows:

ounty tem(s)

om

FiRST . The ts the rming CTO

e with CTO

ghout

ing of ilding art of

on for

Corpor

Internatioor greatebuilding mdBm on-s

As showMarylanddevelopeMHz systhe CounSharptownot by tow Figure III-3

Conceptscoveragemodel founiversityConceptstheir expchecked better pebuilding Maryland More impin-buildin

rate Offices: 801

onal Fire Coer for on-strmaterials, Cstreet and in

wn below, ind FiRST sysed with residtem. Figure nty. Upon inwn areas is bwers within

3 Existing 700

s To Operate) provided or Marylandy, county ads To Operatperience theacross the

enetration lecoverage w

d FiRST for W

portant thanng coverage

Evaluat

Compass Way,

ode Section reet and in-TO uses the

n-building.

n Figure III-3stem is fairlydential hous

III-3 also nonquiry, Marybeing providthe county.

0 MHz Coverag

tions performby the Mard FiRST sdministrationtions, howeve in-buildingstate (only o

evel than hawas not partWicomico C

the coverage in the co

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

510 sets for-building. Ine above loss

3, the low-dy comprehening (low-denotes a portioyland FiRSTded by the V

ge (in-building

med theoretryland FiRSTystem show

n, etc.) whicver, notes thg coverage one (1) buildad been expt of the venounty in-bui

ge analysis unty based


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 18 <<

rth a minimu order to c

s, resulting in

density in-bunsive. A majnsity) which on of the couT noted thatVienna SHA

g low-density)

tical RF in-bT design. Fws coverag

ch are locatehat the Mary

and signalding in Wicopected and

ndor’s contralding analys

is the fact thsolely upo


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

um standardalculate then a system d

uilding covejority of the is covered

unty that is t the coveratower locate

)

building covigure III-4 b

ge to high-ed adjacent yland FiRSTl penetratio

omico Countthat was m

act, no empsis.

hat Motorolaon the desig


24-8911 – cto@c

d of voice que loss of sigdesign with a

erage for thrural regionby the Marynot coveredage of Marded in Dorche

erage analybelow illustra-density bui

to the stateT PMO has n levels, wty was teste

modeled by pirical data

a will not aggn and con


concepts2ops.co

uality at -95 gnal quality a minimum o

he county byn of the counyland FiRST by the towe

dela Springsester County

ysis (high-deates that thildings (hose system towindicated th

which have d), show a mMotorola. Ais available

gree to guaranstruction o

ounty tem(s)

om

dBm from

of -95

y the nty is T 700 ers in s and y and

ensity e RF

spital, wers. hat in been much

As in-from

antee of the

Corpor

Marylandrepresen While repare betteby this rebuildings Figure III-4

Conceptsdone durDAQ voistrength.trees to d 3.1.4 US

There are

rate Offices: 801

d FiRST sntations as to

presentationer than expeceport. As nots, which are

4 Existing 700

s To Operatring the wintce quality fo CTO believ

determine si

E OF LEGA

e various co

System in System e Computer Computer PSAP equ User equi

Evaluat

Compass Way,

system. Beo reliability a

ns by Marylacted, CTO cted below, tnot covered

0 MHz Coverag

ions further ter months wor talk-out aves that testgnal penetra

ACY EQUIPM

omponents to

nfrastructurelectronics (trr hardware cr software couipment (coipment (port

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

ecause theiare being ma

and FiRST hcannot certifyhere are sub.

ge (in-building

notes that bwhere tree fnd talk-backting should ation impact

MENT

o a radio sys

e (towers, anransmitters, componentsomponentsnsoles) tables, mobi


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 19 <<

ir system ade by Motor

have indicatey that it will bbstantial are

g high-density

both the statfoliage is mk, tree foliagbe done at .

stem includin

ntennas, shereceivers) (servers)

les)


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

design warola beyond

ed that the ibe of the leveas of the co

y)

te testing aninimized. W

ge has a sigsuch time a

ng:

elters, genera


24-8911 – cto@c

as for on-the terms o

in-building pvel and qualiounty contai

nd CTO’s spWhen testing gnificant impas there is f

ators)


concepts2ops.co

street onlyof their contra

penetration lity recommening high-de

ot checking and determ

pact on RF sfull foliage o

ounty tem(s)

om

y, no act.

evels ended ensity

were mining signal n the

Corpor

For Optiocontract equipmecompleteother ancounty, wnegotiateMarylandMotorolaprovided program.allowed FiRST wsystem, i Figure IIcounty u700 MHzequipmeindividua Figure III-5

rate Offices: 801

on 1, the curwith Motoront shelters,

ed in Wicomncillary equipwill be the se a deal withd General A intends to ato the Sta

. CTO also to take advith Motorolaincluding use

I-5 below, sers exactly

z system. Eant, other th

al budgets.

5 Maryland FiR

Evaluat

Compass Way,

rrent positionola, will onlyand genera

mico Countypment necesole funding h the Contro

Assembly (Gallow users ate of Marylnotes that tantage of th, for a discoer equipmen

provided byy the same ach of thosehan the infr

RST Infrastruc

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

n of the Mary provide thators) at the. The subsc

essary to opresponsibili

ol Board (StaGeneral Asse

on the Maryland for thethose countihe Marylandunt price fornt.

y Maryland as the state

e agencies, lrastructure,

cture Provided


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 20 <<

ryland FiRSTe infrastruct

eir sites. All criber radiosperate on tity of the coatewide Inteembly) for syland FiRSTe mobiles aes which op

d State Procr equipment

FiRST, inde agencies wlike Wicomicand includ

d (courtesy of


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

T PMO is thature (i.e., toinfrastructur

s, dispatch che Marylan

ounty. Wicomeroperability some cost s

system to tand portablept onto the curement Conecessary t

icates that who elect toco County, we subscribe

f Maryland FiR


24-8911 – cto@c

at Maryland owers, antenre improvemconsoles, sod 700 MHzmico CountyRadio Cont

sharing of thtake advantaes under thMaryland Fiontract, signto utilize the

Maryland Fo utilize the will be requier radio pu

RST)


concepts2ops.co

FiRST, undnnas, controments have oftware, andz system foy may be abtrol Board) ohe replacemage of the pe state disciRST systemned by Mary Maryland F

FiRST is treMaryland Fred to providrchases in

ounty tem(s)

om

der its ollers, been

d any or the ble to or the

ments. ricing count m are yland

FiRST

eating FiRST de all their




>> Page 21 <<

The Maryland FiRST infrastructure consists of antennas, connectors, jumpers, antenna mounts, cables, shelters, generators, and transmit/receive equipment. The Maryland FiRST backhaul system utilizes the existing MIEMSS microwave network. The State of Maryland has installed antennas capable of transmitting and receiving 700 MHz and 800 MHz signals on the following tower sites:

Site Location Antenna Model Fruitland BPS-10-O-B1 Johnson SE419-SF3P2LDF Pittsville SE419-SF3P2LDF Poplar Hill BPS10-O-B1 Salisbury MSP SE419-SF3P2LDF Salisbury SHA BPS10-D-B1

Concepts To Operations has had an opportunity to review the existing equipment used by the 800 MHz analog system and has provided a detailed listing in Appendix A. Summarized below For Option 1, Wicomico County would be required to replace the followings:

a) 8 consoles b) CAD/RMS interface c) Computer interfaces with PSAP and Maryland FiRST prime site d) 4 encrypted radios (software only) e) 366 encrypted radios (hardware and software) f) 1,093 non-law enforcement radios (non-encrypted) g) 667 board of education radios (non-encrypted) h) PSAP and system furniture (non-console)

Utilizing the Maryland FiRST system only would result in none of the existing county antennas, jumpers, cables, connectors, shelters, and generators being used in the new system, as those components have already been installed and provided by the State of Maryland for Maryland FiRST operations. Wicomico County may be required to remove its 800 MHz analog antennas located on the state owned towers (Pittsville and Poplar Hill) providing additional structural strength and capacity on those towers. Paging antennae that are located on those towers will be able to continue to be used. Option 1 does not require the county to add any equipment to the new state shelters and facilities. 3.1.5 COMPATIBILITY WITH NEW CONSOLES

As stated, Maryland FiRST will only provide the infrastructure for any of the users of the system. CTO notes, with the creation of the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board legislation, effective June 1, 2014, negotiation for additional equipment funding might be feasible, however, at the current time there are no provisions for consoles or other equipment in the Maryland FiRST budget. In all of the options, replacement of eight (8) consoles (4 in dispatch, 4 in sheriff) is required. The selection of a new P25 compliant console, which is what is being offered by all console providers, will allow the county the option of operation in the 700 MHz and/or 800 MHz band




>> Page 22 <<

seamlessly. Current console providers are also designing the consoles and their corresponding servers to be upgraded by software rather than hardware replacements. This will reduce the costs in the future of wholesale console replacements when upgrading the radio system. Equipment providers are also designing with a number of future expansion slots, which allow for additional components to be added either as a phased-in improvement or when needed for scalability of the system. 3.1.6 COSTS OF MAINTENANCE

The Maryland FiRST system has six (6) towers in Wicomico County; the towers, the MIEMSS microwave system, the equipment shelters, transmitters, receivers, and generators are all located at state owned and maintained facilities and property. The budget for the cost of operations, maintenance and upgrade will be the responsibility of the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board. While currently not contemplated, it is likely that a cost shift to the users will occur in the future to cover the cost of operations and maintenance. All other costs, including equipment, which the county would incur for its operations (consoles, computers, radios, mobile/portable repair, warranties, service contracts, additional upgrades of hardware and software) would be the responsibility of the county. 3.1.7 LOGGING RECORDER

The Maryland FiRST system does not currently provide logging recorder equipment or services for use by local governments. The state utilizes its own logging recorders for state police and other state departments and does not envision providing additional services to local users on the system. The equipment, software, and new interface will be the responsibility of the county to purchase, install, and maintain. This cost is also included in any of the options selected by the county. 3.1.8 PAGING SYSTEM

Concepts To Operations notes that the Salisbury Fire Department and the Wicomico County volunteer fire departments continue to use pagers as a significant portion of their communications system. The Maryland FiRST system was not designed to provide paging services to local agencies. Concepts To Operations assumes, based upon discussions, that no changes will be made to the current county paging system with the implementation of any of the options outlined in this report. 3.1.9 CROSS-PATCHING

Due to the existence of disparate systems in the region, it is necessary to have a plan in place for accomplishing cross-patching when needed. Cross-patching is physically or electronically joining two or more radio systems together to establish interoperable communications. Without a method of cross-patching in place, systems of differing frequency bands (VHF, UHF, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, etc.), or different modulations (analog, digital), would not be able to communicate with each other. A cross-patch is normally established and monitored at the dispatch centers. At the present time, Wicomico County has established cross-patching protocols in place with their interoperability partners. Concepts To Operations notes that with the adoption of any




>> Page 23 <<

recommended option, new cross-patching protocols and procedures will be required and dispatch personnel appropriately trained. 3.1.10 BACKHAUL AND REDUNDANCY

Radio communications backhaul (getting the signal from the tower antenna to/from the dispatch center and to/from the mobiles and portables) is a critical element of any network. While commercial wireless providers can afford “down time” and system “crashes” or congestion, a public safety system cannot. Failure to plan for redundancy creates a potential “single point of failure” for the system. The Maryland FiRST backhaul system is entirely based around the existing MIEMSS microwave system. Some of the MIEMSS facilities have been upgraded with fiber during the recent One Maryland broadband program. This includes maintaining the licenses in MIEMSS’s name as well as all of the equipment and operation. The use of the FCC licensed microwave paths for all transfer of information and communications between dispatch and first responder is the backbone of the Maryland FiRST system. The Maryland FiRST system failed to meet the recommended redundancy in their design and implementation in an effort to save “costs of the system.” Maryland FiRST and MIEMSS are aware that there are a number of “single points of failure” in the backhaul system due to either microwave or fiber being the sole backhaul path from several key infrastructure elements. Unfortunately, at this time the budget for Phase II has been completed and used with no planned funding for redundancy upgrades by the state. The MEIMSS microwave backhaul system is comprised of eight (8) sites in Wicomico County. Two (2) of the sites are not use for transmission and reception of the Maryland FiRST 700 MHz signal. The six (6) state tower sites, which are used for transmission of signals on the Maryland FiRST system, are noted below, as well as the two (2) sites used for backhaul only:

Site Location Backhaul Fruitland fiber only Salisbury MSP fiber and microwave Salisbury SHA fiber and microwave Johnson DNR microwave only Pittsville microwave only Poplar Hill microwave only Naylor Mill backhaul only Mardela Springs backhaul only

The Maryland FiRST system has partial redundancy, but lacks full backhaul redundancy at four (4) sites.

Corpor

Figure III-6

As showbackhaulinkage in Unrelatedthe backcompletedesignedfunding. Wicomicocommercfiber in Wan extenrural parelementsof existincommun Figure IIexists in

rate Offices: 801

6 MIEMSS - M

wn above in l for the Man the county

d to the conkhaul reduned two majod to provideThis projeco County. cially availab

Wicomico Cosive route orts of the cos, which CTOng fiber is imications in th

I-7 shows ththe Pittsville

Evaluat

Compass Way,

icrowave Bac

Figure III-6, aryland FiRSy is related to

nstruction ofdancy nece

or projects ce fiber to pt was compThe seco

ble fiber acroounty. Combof fiber servicounty (e.g., O identified mportant in he county.

he existing fe and Poplar

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

khaul

the current ST system. o system bac

f the Marylaessary for pconcerning ublic facilitie

pleted in 20nd project,oss the Stateining all of thcing the maPittsville a

as importanthe develop

fiber networr Hill tower lo


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 24 <<

MIEMSS mCTO notes

ckhaul for co

nd FiRST spublic safetyfiber opticses including12; and con Maryland e of Marylanhe public anin highwaysnd Poplar H

nt in the anapment of red

rk available ocations.


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

microwave sys that much ounties surro

system, but y, the State. The first p

g schools annected a n

Broadbandnd. Figure IInd private fibs with little toHill). Redunalysis of anydundancy b

in Wicomico


24-8911 – cto@c

ystem serveof the MIE

ounding Wic

important toe of Marylaproject, One

and librariesnumber of cd, was deI-7 below de

ber optic runso no connecndancy is ony new radio backhaul sys

o County. N


concepts2ops.co

es as the priEMSS microcomico.

o developmeand has rece Maryland,s utilizing feritical faciliti

esigned to etails the exs, the county

ctivity in the ne of the csystem. Thestems to su

Note that no

ounty tem(s)

om

imary wave

ent of cently was

ederal ies in map

xisting y has more

critical e use pport

fiber

Corpor

Figure III-7

Unfortunwhich paMIEMSStheir towenetwork sites. Marylandremain wto be cooand Mary 3.1.11 CO

The Maryare sufficon the Mmaintain would bespace in 3.1.12 A

The Matransmit/

rate Offices: 801

7 Maryland FiR

ately, the Braid for most S has indicaters, which wsystem. MIE

d FiRST haswithin MIEMSordinated wyland FiRST

OMMUNICA

yland FiRSTcient to provMaryland FiR

its paging se required twhich the sy

NTENNA RE

aryland FiRreceive ante

Evaluat

Compass Way,

RST – Fiber B

roadband Teof the One ted they wo

would createEMSS has s

s indicated thSS control. Aith MIEMSS

T concerning

ATIONS SPA

T PMO has ivide for the nRST systemsystem, whio separatelyystems are c

EQUIREME

RST systemennas and

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

ackhaul in Sa

echnology OMaryland n

ould welcom a redundanstated that t

hey will not bAny changes

S. At this timg the use of t

ACE REQUI

indicated thaneeds of the

m. However, ich is collocy maintain tcurrently loc

NTS

m has two the microwa


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 25 <<

alisbury

Opportunitiesnetwork, expe the const

ncy for their they have n

be re-licensis to the licen

me, there is nthe microwa

IREMENTS

at the transme communicCTO notes

cated on twothe operatiocated.

(2) main ave antenna


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

s Program (Bpired with fintruction of aoperations a

no plans to i

ng the micronses or addino written a

ave for the 70

mitters and rcations spaces in Sectiono of the statons of the p

componena from MIE


24-8911 – cto@c

BTOP) fundinal accountinadditional fiband improveinstall fiber

owave links itions to the

agreement b00 MHz syst

receivers in e requireme2.1.4, that

te towers. Wpaging syste

nts for its EMSS. The


concepts2ops.co

ing authorizang due FY 2

ber optic cabe the overall to any addit

and that thesystem will etween MIEtem.

the new sheents for operthe county

Wicomico Coem, including

antennas. Maryland F

ounty tem(s)

om

ation, 2013. ble to state tional

ey will have

EMSS

elters ration must

ounty g the

The FiRST




>> Page 26 <<

design has one (1) transmit antenna and two (2) receive antennas per site. The antennas installed and in operation for Maryland FiRST are as follows:

Site Location Antenna Model Fruitland BPS-10-O-B1 Johnson SE419-SF3P2LDF Pittsville SE419-SF3P2LDF Poplar Hill BPS10-O-B1 Salisbury MSP SE419-SF3P2LDF Salisbury SHA BPS10-D-B1

The MIEMSS FCC records indicate the following microwave dishes supporting communications in Wicomico County:

MNI Model LBW-CM6HC-1DS3 (Salisbury MSP) MNI Model AMT-M6-I-10-50MPS (Mardela Springs) Tadiran Microwave Model LBW-CM6HC-28DS1 (Vienna) MNI Proteus AMT M6I-10-50MPS (Poplar Hill) Tadiran Microwave Model LBW-CM6HC-28DS1 (Salisbury) Tadiran Microwave Model LBW-CM6HC-28DS1 (Pittsville) Tadiran Microwave Model LBW-CM6HC-28DS1 (Central) MNI Model LBW-CM6HC-1DS3 (Johnson DNR) MNI Model LBW-CM6HC-1DS3 (Salisbury SHA) MNI Model LBW-CM6HC-1DS3 (Nassawango)

Maryland FiRST has designed these antennas to operate on both the 700 and 800 MHz bands. This allows the phased-in transition of the Maryland FiRST system. 3.1.13 FCC LICENSES

The FCC has issued the State of Maryland the following license for the Maryland FiRST system in Wicomico County:

Call Sign: WQQJ423 File No: 0005434536 Radio Service SY – Trunked Public Safety 700 MHz Frequency Coordination: 53SYAP92023204 FRN: 0004068177 Expiration Date: 01/7/2023 Licensee: State of Maryland – Department of Information Technology

The license, which has been issued by the FCC to the State of Maryland – DoIT, includes the designation of six (6) fixed sites, 6,500 mobile radios (state users) and ten (10) mobiles (Maryland State police) in the area of operation of Wicomico County. There is an associated call sign of WPTZ805, which relates to the operation of the Maryland FiRST system across all of the counties in the state. In discussions with the Maryland FiRST staff, they have indicated that for any additional sites, mobiles and/or portables which may be required for the full operation of the county system, licensing would be prepared by the county and its consultant, but would be submitted by the State of Maryland or MIEMSS, as they are the licensee. DoIT would coordinate




>> Page 27 <<

any changes to the license with the Region 20 Regional Planning Committee (RPC) and would work on the approvals from the three (3) surrounding RPCs for the amendment of the 700 MHz plan that has been submitted by Maryland FiRST and the region for approval by the FCC. The microwave system used by Maryland FiRST is still licensed and controlled by Maryland Institute of Emergency Medical Services System (MIEMSS) under the MW (microwave public safety pool) classification in 47 CFR. There are no microwave paths licensed to Maryland FiRST at this time.

MIEMSS Microwave Sites WNTW398 Pittsville WPUJ311 Pittsville WNTY926 Poplar Hill WPUH594 Quantico WPUH595 Naylor Mill WQHP659 Salisbury SHA WQHP660 Salisbury SHA WQHP662 Johnson DNR WQHP734 Salisbury MSP No MW Fruitland

Maryland FiRST has indicated they will not be re-licensing the microwave links and they will remain under MIEMSS control. Any changes to the licenses or additions to the system will have to be coordinated with MIEMSS. At this time, there is no written agreement between MIEMSS and Maryland FiRST concerning the use of the microwave for the Maryland FiRST system. A review of the records does not indicate that amendments have been made concerning use of the Maryland FiRST system on the MIEMSS network. 3.1.14 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY

Wicomico County has formal and informal interoperability agreements with the following:

Maryland State Police (MSP) City of Salisbury Dorchester County Somerset County Worcester County MIEMSS Delaware State Police Town of Ocean City Sussex County Delaware Salisbury University Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Department of Natural Resources Maryland Emergency Management Talbot County Maryland Forestry US Coast Guard FBI MDE




>> Page 28 <<

The transfer from analog to digital, whether it’s on the Maryland FiRST system or on a new countywide 800 MHz system, will have an impact on the mobiles and portables used by the above agencies. Under an agreement with the State of Maryland, The State of Delaware, including the Delaware State Police (who operate on the 800 MHz frequency band), have agreed to provide interoperability through the use and installation of an Inter RF Subsystem Interface (ISSI) 8000 between the two systems. The use of the ISSI through the Maryland FiRST system will allow Wicomico County to continue to operate with Delaware and its agencies seamlessly, without incurring the costs of installing a separate ISSI interface on its own system. The ISSI provides an interface for connecting Project 25 (P25) systems together. This allows users to roam onto other P25 systems providing network-to-network interoperability. The P25 ISSI is a network IP-based solution, which builds upon today’s P25 over the air “Common Air Interface” (CAI). A key advantage of wireline interoperability solutions is that systems of different system IDs, different user databases, and of different frequency bands can be interconnected. It allows public safety agencies to; utilize the coverage areas of existing connected networks, which might span thousands of square miles; maintain secure, encrypted traffic across the networks, if required; and roam onto connected networks while still being able to communicate with home dispatcher. A P25 ISSI offers the following features:

Connect P25 trunked systems together Allows interconnection of different frequency bands Allows usage of system across different geographic locations Allows the interconnection of different manufacturers’ P25 equipment (that supports

ISSI) Allows use of different system IDs and user databases Maintains visibility across all connected networks, so personnel deployed to a distant

location are still in contact with their home dispatchers and commanders Maintains several call management features across systems, including group calls,

emergency calls, and end-to-end encryption Establishes interoperability talkgroups with users from any or all connected networks;

agencies can preconfigure those talkgroups in accordance with emergency plans and activate them when needed

Can dynamically configure the groups, as necessary, to support joint operations in fast-changing circumstances

Maryland FiRST has set aside a statewide emergency channel in which it envisions all of the counties’ systems, whether they are operating on Maryland FiRST, utilizing portions of Maryland FiRST, or operating independent of Maryland FiRST, will be able to access. Most of the new P25 enabled mobiles and portables, depending upon models, are capable of receiving 700 MHz signals. Continued reception from those entities that use non- 700/800 MHz systems will have to rely upon patching and cross-patching to maintain their interoperability with the county system or be required to carry multiple radios.




>> Page 29 <<

3.1.15 STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO CONTROL BOARD

On January 17, 2014, the speaker and president of the Maryland House of Delegates, at the request of the governor, introduced SB338/HB308 setting forth the development of a Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board (see Appendix B). The legislation was drafted by the governor’s office and is one of four (4) major initiatives in the governor’s 2014 legislative agenda. The legislation is supported by Maryland Association of Counties (MACO) as one of its top three (3) priorities. The legislation, as proposed, creates an eleven (11) member board (6 state and 5 other); all members are appointed by the governor. The House hearing on HB308 was held on January 30, 2014. Both the House Appropriation and the Health & Government standing committees voted without amendment or opposition to adoption of the legislation as drafted. At the hearing for the senate bill on February 18, 2014, the chairman of the Senate Finance committee indicated that the committee would pass the bill. The Maryland House of Delegates passed the bill 129-0 and the senate bill passed 47-0. During the latter part of the session, the house and senate both passed their respective opposite chambers bills without amendment. The governor signed the legislation on April 14, 2014 as Chapter 117 of the Statutes of the State of Maryland. The effective date of the legislation is June 1, 2014 CTO notes that the Maryland FiRST system is only partially complete. The FY 2015 Capital Budget indicates a budget request for $26.1 million for the next phase of construction with $93.1 million remaining for appropriation in FY 2016-2018. These funds are to be provided by General Obligation (GO) bonds. GO bonds are prohibited from being used for operating budgets. The Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board will be required to put together an operating budget for the system, and separate it from the Motorola contract. While the fiscal notes indicate that there is no funding impact, DoIT will provide the administrative support for the board. The cost of: (1) annual maintenance contract with Motorola; (2) cost of operations (i.e., utilities, FCC licenses); and (3) cost of repairing the radio infrastructure will all be in the future budget submitted under the governor’s administrative budget (all agencies are submitted under the executive branch). Concepts To Operations believes that at some point (either FY 2016 or FY 2017) the new board will have to allocate costs to counties that are operating on the state system. Concepts To Operations believes that this allocation is likely to be patterned off of either the Michigan or Illinois model which allocates the costs by number of radios on the system. CTO notes that one of the models used has the state on their system without cost (state agency radios free). While CTO cannot accurately predict the actions of the new governor or the General Assembly, it is likely that operating cost allocations to users will occur in the near term (see Appendix C). With the creation of the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board, Concepts To Operations believes that, should the county decide to join the system, negotiations may be possible with the newly created board. CTO has delineated issues (see Section 3.1.16) important to Wicomico County, regardless of which option is selected. The issues of future costs of operation of the system, improvement to the system, and the likelihood of requiring local users to share the costs, are a few of the key issues that CTO has identified as important to the future use of the Maryland FiRST radio system by the county. The creation of unfunded mandates for costs and improvements would not be in the control of Wicomico County.




>> Page 30 <<

3.1.16 SYSTEM GOVERNANCE

Based upon the membership as created by the legislation, and the expected workload of the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board, Concepts To Operations does not believe that the decision by Wicomico County of either joining the Maryland FiRST system or augmenting the system will have a difference in the governance nor the representation on the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board. The new board is expected to be geographically balanced, which may result in counties that are utilizing the Maryland FiRST system as their primary communication system to have no direct representation on the board. This issue is a major concern for the county. Concepts To Operations believes this lack of control is the single largest factor that Wicomico County needs to consider in adopting use of the Maryland FiRST system. There is no greater responsibility to the citizens of Wicomico County than providing public safety services. Whether it is law enforcement, fire, or emergency medical services, the citizens expect a service that does not fail. CTO notes that one of the greatest concerns about utilizing the Maryland FiRST for first responders is that the system, its components, and its operations, are not within the control of Wicomico County. CTO’s evaluation of the governance issue by the Control Board and the use of Maryland FiRST system have been influenced by the primary principals outlined earlier and restated below. The system must have:

1. Channel capacity for current and future needs 2. Sustainability in a major weather event 3. In-building talk-out and talk-back with clarity 4. Comprehensive coverage for first responders 5. Redundancy with interconnections 6. Interoperability with other public safety agencies

The five (5) critical elements that Wicomico County needs to negotiate with the Control Board concerning utilization of any portion of the system are:

1. Guarantee of sufficient channels for operation in the future with NG9-1-1 2. Membership on the Control Board 3. Future cost of the Maryland FiRST system to Wicomico County 4. Control of future software and hardware upgrade by Maryland FiRST

mandated on Wicomico County 5. Use of Maryland state real property for county tower construction (potential

cost savings to Wicomico County of $1.025 million)

The most important of these issues are the access to, and guarantee of, sufficient channels for future use. CTO believes that the Wicomico County radio system, as it now operates, will exceed its channel capacity in the near term. This will result in the need for additional channels either in the 700 or 800 MHz frequency bands. As there are few 800 MHz channels currently available in the Wicomico County region, access to and securing channels in the 700 MHz band is a prudent course of action.




>> Page 31 <<

In the negotiations with the Control Board, Concepts To Operations has determined that the two critical must-have issues which would impact the county on whether to use the Maryland FiRST system for any portion of its communication network are:

Control of future costs of the system (unfunded mandates to users) Access to channels needed for voice and data (now and future)

3.1.16.1 Critical Issues with the New Control Board

In implementing the recommendations in this report, CTO would also recommend an aggressive negotiation posture with the Control Board, beginning in July 2014, concerning Wicomico County’s use of the Maryland FiRST system. Noted below, in general terms, are key issues that CTO believes are critical for Wicomico County to address and negotiate with the Control Board, ultimately to determine utilization of the system. Note that these are general points, as this is a legal negotiation with the assistant attorney general, who will be assigned to the Control Board once it is created. 3.1.16.1.1 Channel Capacity and Dedicated Future Expansion

After review of the channel utilization by Wicomico County (7 channels), CTO determined that, while currently operated not as efficiently as possible, there are sufficient channels. However, based upon what CTO projects as the bandwidth required for implementation of the new public safety radio communications, CTO does not believe that the current seven (7) channels will be able to handle: (1) an encrypted channel; (2) video and data projected from the future implementation of NG9-1-1 systems; (3) future access to the cloud for real time data (i.e., multi-level building schematics (x, y, z)); and (4) addition of either the City of Salisbury or Salisbury University (10 years in the future). Each of these factors requires additional channels, which are not available today in the 800 MHz band on the Eastern Shore. Concepts To Operations recommends that the county apply for, and use, the two (2) channels that have been set aside on the Maryland FiRST system. The Control Board is likely to require a “grade of service” analysis to justify the use of these channels. CTO recommends that the county secure an agreement that at minimum these two (2) channels will be solely dedicated to the county now and in the future. In addition, Wicomico County should negotiate access to additional channels in the 700 MHz band in the future, rather than leaving this up to “happenstance.” 3.1.16.1.2 Membership and Control of the Radio Control Board

Concepts To Operations believes that the current setup of the 11 members of the Control Board, all appointed by the governor, is of concern. CTO believes that should Wicomico County place its first responders (law enforcement and fire) on the system, it should be one of the 11 members of the Control Board. Currently, the state envisions utilization of the Maryland FiRST system with over 6,500 state agency subscribers when the system is fully operational. Should Wicomico County join the system, the first responders using the system will number more than 2,000 becoming more than quarter of the total users on the system. Once a number of counties elect to join the Maryland FiRST system, the local users will outnumber the state agencies users (defacto making this a local system with statewide reach versus a state agency system). However, without a major change in the membership of the board, the state will maintain control. CTO recommends that if Wicomico County representation is not initially selected,




>> Page 32 <<

Wicomico County, through MACO, should work to change the board membership to ensure all county users are members of the board. 3.1.16.1.3 Future Costs of the System

One of the issues that CTO confronted during the evaluation of the Maryland FiRST system is the future costs of the operation of the system. Since the system is only half-built and covers approximately 50% of the population of Maryland, the focus of the PMO has been on completion of the system and not on its operation. This was the trigger for the creation of the Control Board. One of the first tasks of the Control Board will be to develop an operational budget and request funding for that operation. While the PMO currently has no understanding of the true costs (utilities, maintenance and repair, software and hardware upgrades), it will have to grapple with that issue shortly after its creation. CTO believes that controlling the cost of the system, either through an agreement with the board or a guarantee, is important to the future use of the system. 3.1.16.1.4 Future Software and Hardware Upgrades

One of the operational decisions of Maryland FiRST is the agreement with the vendor to secure a contract for maintenance and upgrade, including the new “Software Upgrade Assurance” program. Maryland had a choice of 1, 2, 4, and 6 years. While this program is expensive, the one selected by the State of Maryland requires Motorola to upgrade the software version operating the primary system every 2 years. In the past, Motorola has released a new upgraded software version approximately every 14-16 months, and has indicated that any user on the Maryland FiRST system will be required to match software upgrades every two years. This is an “unfunded mandate” ($250,000/yr.) to Wicomico County which CTO would recommend negotiating either payment or minimizing payment by Wicomico County for operation on the system. Motorola offers a Migration Assurance Program (MAP) specifically designed for the system to which it is installed. To date, Maryland FiRST has not been offered the MAP nor has it contracted to have it. Completion of the system in FY 2016 to all portions of the State of Maryland would likely trigger the decision on the part of the Control Board on whether to sign a MAP agreement covering the equipment of the system. CTO cannot project whether the Control Board will contract for the MAP, but should that decision be made, it is likely, in CTO’s opinion, that the cost, which is significant given the size of the state system, will be passed onto the users in some fashion (see Appendix E). 3.1.16.1.5 Use of Maryland State Real Property

One of the key issues for the construction of a new radio system is the development of a tower network which provides the comprehensive coverage (in-building) guaranteed by the vendor. While the final vendor will design a system which will allow them to guarantee the coverage, CTO has determined that utilizing the State of Maryland property (real property) for the location of the new towers offers the county an opportunity to reduce the overall costs of the system. CTO notes that the basis of the Motorola design for Maryland FiRST was predicated on the use of state property for tower locations, in an effort to contain costs. CTO believes that Maryland FiRST and the state would work with Wicomico County concerning this issue.




>> Page 33 <<

In Wicomico County, Maryland FiRST maintains six (6) towers with a seventh (7th) tower being used for microwave and an eighth (8th) tower located outside of the county to cover the Sharptown area. Each of these state facilities will require maintenance and repair. The Maryland PMO indicated that it would be up to the Control Board to determine whether any “capital costs” for infrastructure replacement will be assessed against the local counties who are operating on the system or where the towers are located. While not currently an expected cost, the cost of structural upgrade ($50,000-100,000) or the construction of a new tower ($200,000-$350,000) is possible. Concepts To Operations is concerned about the transfer of costs in the future to the users or directly to the counties. In Appendix C, CTO provides documentation from Michigan and Illinois as an illustration on the allocation of costs of operations and maintenance to users. CTO believes that due to the long-term fiscal issues (structural deficit) of the Maryland budget, the Control Board will be looking in the future to transfer costs to the users. This is an unfunded liability on the part of the county, which will need to be negotiated with the control board. 3.1.17 CAPACITY PLANNING WITH MARYLAND FIRST

Maryland FiRST has indicated that the system, as designed, currently has capacity to provide all of the talkgroups necessary for operation of the existing system. The existing analog system has seven (7) channels (six (6) talk paths and one (1) control). The Maryland FiRST staff has also indicated that it is up to the local jurisdictions to control the use of its channels and users using “best industry practices” for usage by subscribers. The Maryland FiRST system currently has two (2) channels allocated for the county and has additional channels available based upon need. Concepts To Operations notes that these channels have been allocated for Wicomico County use, but not permanently dedicated. Should other users in the state need those channels, the Control Board could “re-allocate” that spectrum due to other users’ needs. At the time when Wicomico County decides to join the Maryland FiRST system a “grade of service” analysis should be completed to determine the number of channels. Maryland FiRST has reviewed the current channel loading and believes that the system can accommodate all existing traffic for Wicomico County. Concepts To Operations is concerned about ensuring sufficient channel capacity with Maryland FiRST. Should Wicomico County determine that it will utilize the Maryland FiRST system, a negotiation for additional channels may be required. 3.1.18 FREQUENCY SHARING WITH MARYLAND FIRST

At the current time, Maryland FiRST has set aside certain channels, which have been allocated to Wicomico County operations. In addition, Maryland FiRST has set aside several statewide channels for emergency use and has set aside ten (10) talk paths in Wicomico County for operation of state agencies within the Wicomico County region. The Maryland FiRST system is a P25 Phase II TDMA system. The channels dedicated to Wicomico County in the system are not scheduled to be used by any of the state agencies. Maryland FiRST has indicated that the system priority will be set so that the channels will have the county as priority and not any of the state agencies. Concepts To Operations notes that the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board will have control of the

Corpor

system oafter thatused by Wdecide thprogrammthe FCC of Wicom The MarMultiple A TDMA is(TDM). Tamount oFigure III In this waequipmereconstitand trans Figure III-8

In the diatransmitt

rate Offices: 801

once signed t point. ConWicomico Chat they areming of the rules for cha

mico County

ryland FiRSTAccess (TDM

s a technoloTDMA technof data that I-8).

ay, a single nt must beuting it usingsmitted (mul

8 Time Divisio

agram, the ced in a quar

Evaluat

Compass Way,

into law. Thcepts To Op

County. Conce not going “unified chaannel loadinchannels sh

T system haMA) system.

ogy for delivnology divid

can be car

frequency ce able to deg the same tiplexed).

on Multiple Ac

channel is sprter of the tim

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

he board wilperations docepts To Opto use the

nnels,” the bng. No discuhould the cou

as been des. The other t

vering digitaes a radio rried, and th

can support ecode the timeslot sel

cess (TDMA)

plit into four tme taken to s


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 34 <<

l control theoes not envierations doeMaryland F

board is likession was hunty not elec

signed, andtwo possibili

al wireless sfrequency i

hen allocates

multiple, simreceived sigection algor

Graph (courte

time slots, sosay it.


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

e sharing of sion the boaes note, howFiRST 700 Mly to find a ueld with Marct to use the

d is being oties would b

service usingnto time slos these time

multaneous cgnal by derithm as was

esy of Tait Com

o in each slo


24-8911 – cto@c

spectrum beard decreaswever, that sMHz systemuse for thoseryland FiRS

e Maryland F

perated, as be FDMA an

g Time-Divisots in ordere slots to m

conversationmultiplexings used when

mmunications

ot the voice


concepts2ops.co

etween the using the chashould the com, except foe channels uT about thei

FiRST system

a Time Divd CDMA.

sion Multipler to increase

multiple calls

ns. The receg the signaln it was enc

s)

signal is

ounty tem(s)

om

users nnels ounty

or the under ir use m.

vision

exing e the (see

eiving l and coded

Corpor

3.1.19 M

One of thmaster sFiRST haand remoMarylandconstructconnecte The MarState of the mastas it app As the srelated to(the systclosed, a Figure III-9

rate Offices: 801

ASTER SW

he key elemsites across as designedote simulcasd State Polited). The r

ed to the Cec

ryland FiRSTMaryland wer sites, thelies to the m

ystem is ono the systemtem vendor)all operations

9 Maryland FiR

Evaluat

Compass Way,

WITCH ACCE

ents of the Mdifferent reg the system

st RF sites. ce barracks

redundant scil County to

T project mwould be stru

master site master switch

nly partially cm and the m). Once the s issues will

RST System (c

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

ESS WITH M

Maryland Figions of the with each cIn the case s in Easton site for Wicower.

management uck and impwould meet

h.

constructed,master switc

system is fall under th

courtesy of M


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 35 <<

MARYLAND

RST statewistate (see F

county contaof Wicomicoand is con

comico Cou

consultantpacted by tht sustainabil

, access, coch are contrcompleted a

he Statewide

Maryland FiRST


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

D FIRST

ide system iFigure III-9 bained within o County, thnnected by nty is also

stated thathe same eveity standard

ontrol prograrolled by Maand the proe Interoperab

T)


24-8911 – cto@c

is the constrbelow). In adits own cell e prime sitemicrowave

o located in

it is unlikelent. By regis and redun

amming, andaryland FiRSogram manability Radio C


concepts2ops.co

ruction of fouddition, Marywith a prime

e is located aand fiber (n

n Easton an

ly that the eonally dispe

ndancy stand

d other funcST and Motagement offiControl Boa

ounty tem(s)

om

ur (4) yland e site at the newly nd is

entire ersing dards

ctions torola ice is rd.




>> Page 36 <<

3.1.20 SYSTEM MONITORING WITH MARYLAND FIRST

The Maryland FiRST system is only partially constructed and does not have all Maryland state agencies operating on the system. The Maryland State Police have only recently started using the system, which only covers a portion of the State of Maryland. At present, all operations are being managed by the PMO with MIEMSS monitoring its microwave backhaul system. Maryland FiRST is also operating the master site for the Wicomico County portion of the Maryland FiRST system. Concepts To Operations notes that it is the responsibility of Wicomico County to operate and monitor its operations (PSAP) and the functioning of its own radios. 3.1.21 ENCRYPTION AND SECURITY OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM

The Maryland FiRST system PMO has indicated that encryption is at the election of the local user. The emergency channel will not be encrypted to allow all users, regardless of their portables, to receive and operate on the channel. Presently, none of the channels that Wicomico County uses are encrypted, but requests for encryption on at least one channel were voiced during the discussion of this report. During the interview portion of this project, law enforcement system subscribers voiced a desire to move toward a single encrypted channel to be used to ensure that certain conversations between dispatch, first responders, and support cannot be listened to by third parties. Wicomico County may request that one of the channels on the Maryland FiRST system be encrypted for their use. This encryption would be an additional expense for which Wicomico County would be responsible. 3.1.22 FUTURE EXPANSION VIABILITY/P25 RADIO PLATFORM

The Maryland FiRST system, as a system, has substantial capabilities for future expansion and scalability. It is anticipated that less than 10,000 state agency users, including the Maryland State Police, will operate on the entire system in the future. This allows for substantial system excess which is what is being touted to local governmental entities for their use of the system, either as a primary system or as a partner with the state. Concepts To Operations notes that NENA has recently recommended the adoption of i3 architecture, which would support the movement of public safety voice communications to an IP-based system. While outside of the scope of this report, Concepts To Operations would recommend that, at the time of the upgrade of the system, the county work with Verizon to move all of the public safety communication architecture to the NENA i3 recommended platform. Concepts To Operations would further note that LTE is currently in vogue as a pathway for commercial carriers to increase their bandwidth to support usage. CTO’s review of the current applications and movement of public safety communications to LTE shows little progress or impetus. CTO would not recommend movement to LTE for the new radio system without further analysis. One of the primary purposes of the P25 system is the requirement that all vendors use the platform (i.e., you are not constrained to one provider, but can receive competitive bids from multiple providers). The Maryland FiRST system will be managed by the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board, which will have the control and directive to expand and change the system in the future. Their legislative mandate also includes funding. Concepts To Operations believes that the board will:




>> Page 37 <<

(1) Adopt a standard protocol for Text-to-911 (2) Adopt a standard protocol for Picture-to-911 (NG9-1-1 future) (3) Adopt a standard protocol for Video-to-911 (NG9-1-1 future) (4) Adopt VoIP (in the near term) (5) Adopt the use of the cloud (internal and external) for system operations, as

well as access to statewide crime and incident information 3.1.23 FUTURE COST OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM

At the time of this report, the Maryland FiRST system is still in the construction phase, operational costs, electric, etc. is currently being funded out of the overall budget for Maryland DoIT and the Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola. At the time the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board takes control, one of the designated functions is to create a budget. At the current time, it is expected that the budget would be part of the executive branch overall budget, similar to the budget requests of each department. The budget is subject to control by the governor and finally by the Maryland General Assembly, who can alter the budget of any board or entity, including increasing or decreasing that departmental budget. While the current program management office does not envision charging users, it is unlikely that the “no charge” system would continue once the true cost of operating the system is known. History shows that the General Assembly more often decreases budgets for individual boards and operations and further, over the last 30 years, has sought to transfer the responsibility of local cost back to the individual counties (highway user, pension, library, courts, etc.). For reference, Concepts To Operations has included, in Appendix C, examples for costing from a statewide system being passed onto local jurisdiction users (Michigan and Illinois). The cost models can be by radio ($40 to $70 per month) or by user ($10 a Talkgroup (TG) per month) or a combination. It is important to note that, in both cases, the state agencies were exempt from contributions for their operations. A determination and comparison of costs related to Option 1 are identified and analyzed in Section V of this report. 3.2 OPTION 2 – MARYLAND FIRST AUGMENTED SYSTEM

In properly evaluating the Maryland FiRST system, Concepts To Operations assessed the existing Maryland FiRST system as it was built in Wicomico County (Option 1). In its assessment, CTO determined that utilizing the Maryland FiRST system “as is” does not meet a number of the criteria for providing first responder communication services on the local level sufficient to meet the minimum requirements for DAQ 3.4 or better for all buildings in the county. To come closer to meeting the coverage requirements necessary for comprehensive first responder communications for Wicomico County, CTO assessed whether utilizing the Maryland FiRST system as a base system with the county providing additional infrastructure (new towers, fiber routes, and additional microwave links to the Maryland FiRST system) would meet the overall goals of the county. To meet the requirements of the county and CTO based recommendations, Wicomico County would be required to augment the Maryland FiRST system as follows:

Corpor

abcdef.

3.2.1 AU

Figure IIillustratesMaryland Figure III-1

While thesame, thFiRST syWhile acstandardof non-coonly rateon-street Conceptswith in-bhad anticthe in-bu ConsistecoverageCode seMaryland

rate Offices: 801

. Reconstru

. Construct

. Replacem

. Structural

. ConstructConstruct

UGMENTED

I-10 illustrats the projecd FiRST syst

10 Existing 70

e coverage is will hold tystem was cceptable fo for local firsoverage adj

ed for on-stret system.

s To Operatuilding covecipated. Howilding covera

ent with dese, Concepts ction 510, pd FiRST aug

Evaluat

Compass Way,

uction of thetion of a tow

ment of statel upgrade of tion of 17 mition of additi

SYSTEM C

tes the Marcted on-streetem.

00 MHz Covera

in the Marytrue only fordesigned a

or on-street st responderacent and weet coverage

tions noted erage for buwever, no eage necessa

sign criteria To Operatio

provided in Sgmented by a

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

e prime site twer within thee antennas af 5 state toweiles of new fonal 10 mic

COVERAGE

ryland FiRSet coverage

age (on-street

yland FiRSTr on-street, und guarantestate agen

rs. CTO utilizwith a reliabe. Any in-bu

in Option 1 uildings in Smpirical datary inside th

for a new ons analyzedSection 3.3.2an additiona


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 38 <<

to Naylor Mile City of Saliat 3 sites to ders iber optic carowave links

(SINGLE PO

T on-street (-95 dBm)

)

Figure I

T and CTO’unobstructedeed at 95% cy responsezes a 98% c

bility factor ouilding cover

that its spoalisbury wasta has beene City of Sa

P25 Phase d county in-b2 of this rep

al tower (Mile


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ll isbury directional p

able s

OINT OF FA

coverage (with the ad

II-11 Proposed

’s augmented coverage coverage we, 95/95 is coverage reqof 98%. Therage is incid

ot testing of s better tha provided nlisbury meet

II comprehbuilding cov

port). Figure estone).


24-8911 – cto@c

anels

AILURE)

(-95 dBm) addition of on

d 700 MHz Co

ed system ain the countwith a 95% generally n

quirement, we Maryland dental to the

the Marylann the Maryl

nor completets the requir

hensive locaverage (see

III-12 illustr


concepts2ops.co

and Figure ne (1) site t

overage (on-st

appear to bety. The Maryreliability fa

not the accewith no two aFiRST syste

e operation o

nd FiRST syand FiRST

ed to ensurered levels.

al first respoInternationarates the ex

ounty tem(s)

om

III-11 o the

treet)

e the yland actor. epted areas em is of the

ystem team

e that

onder al Fire xisting

Corpor

Figure III-1

As showsufficientgenerallystructure ConceptsobjectiveIII-13 shodensity b

rate Offices: 801

12 Proposed 7

n by the abot in-building y densely foes.

s To Operates for the nows the in-b

buildings.

Evaluat

Compass Way,

700 MHz Cove

ove figure, acoverage f

rested locat

tions furtherew county building cov

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

erage (in-build

majority of for first resptions. Low-d

r analyzed ccommunicat

verage of the


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 39 <<

ing low-densi

the rural lowponders. Thdensity build

county in-butions systeme augmente


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ity)

w-density hohose areas ings are ge

uilding coverm for mediued Maryland


24-8911 – cto@c

using and bthat show nnerally sing

rage pursuaum-density FiRST syst


concepts2ops.co

uildings will no coveragele-family wo

nt to the debuildings. Ftem for med

ounty tem(s)

om

have e are

ooden

esired Figure dium-

Corpor

Figure III-1

Medium-(with opebuilding cmedium-density) Figure IIIhigh-denthe desir

rate Offices: 801

13 Proposed 7

-density builen hallways)coverage fo-density builhave minima

I-14 illustratesity area. C

red objective

Evaluat

Compass Way,

700 MHz Cove

dings are t), and somer portions ofldings. The al high-dens

es the augmConcepts Toes for the new

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

erage (in-build

hose which e shopping cf the county

portions ofsity buildings

mented Maryo Operationsw county co


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 40 <<

ing medium-d

have conccenters. The, but still haf the count

s.

yland FiRSTs analyzed cmmunication


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

density)

crete walls, e figure abos a level of ty that rema

T system witcounty in-buns system.


24-8911 – cto@c

mid-rise gaove shows acoverage thain uncover

h in-buildinguilding cove


concepts2ops.co

arden apartma decrease hat includes red (at med

g coverage irage pursua

ounty tem(s)

om

ments of in-most

dium-

n the ant to

Corpor

Figure III-1

High-denmaterialsmulti-stocontainincenter) osupplemeuncovereopen pla(see Sec To ensurthe BennMilestone

rate Offices: 801

14 Proposed 7

nsity buildings and larger ry. The figur

ng large proon the Maryent its coveed. While thetform BDAs

ction 5.6).

re coverage,nett School e tower; (3)

Evaluat

Compass Way,

700 MHz Cove

gs tend to bfloors. The

re above shooportions ofyland FiRSTerage in cre county has for public s

, Option 2 wComplex. Oa school ligh

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

erage (in-build

be specializbuildings te

ows significaf high-densiT system. Inritical govers issued legisafety, to dat

would place aOptions for tht; or (4) the


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 41 <<

ing high-dens

zed buildingend to be chant decreasety buildings

n the past, Wnment buildislation, whicte no new b

an additionahis additiona constructio


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

sity)

s with interharacterized e of in-buildins (hospital, Wicomico Cdings, leavinch purports t

building has

l tower withial site includn of a new c


24-8911 – cto@c

riors containby interior h

ng coverageuniversity,

County has ng private to have privacomplied w

n the city limde: (1) a wacounty owne


concepts2ops.co

ning a mixtuhallways ane, including aand governutilized BDAbuildings laate buildingsith the legis

mits, locatedater tank; (2

ed tower.

ounty tem(s)

om

ure of d are areas

nment As to argely s add lation

near 2) the




>> Page 42 <<

Figure III-15 is an enlargement of the area containing the majority of high-density buildings in the county for in-building coverage. Figure III-15 Proposed 700 MHz Coverage (in-building high-density zoom)

Concepts To Operations did some in-building spot testing of the Maryland FiRST system on February 27, 2014. The in-building testing was limited to ten (10) building locations, with no control of the Maryland FiRST system and no talk-out/talk-back capability during the testing. Without full analysis, the Maryland FiRST system provided better coverage than Motorola had projected in their design. Please note that the Motorola design was on-street only with in-building coverage incidental to on-street. At the time of the issuance of the RFP, Maryland FiRST had not created its Phase 2 construction plan covering Wicomico County. After the award of the RFP, the Maryland FiRST PMO established a construction schedule for Motorola to complete the installation of the Maryland FiRST system by December 2013, with acceptance testing and then acceptance of the Wicomico County portion of the system to be completed by February 2014. CTO requested to spot test the Maryland FiRST system within Wicomico County in January 2014 and was denied access. After additional requests, CTO was told that they could spot test the Maryland FiRST system (limited) on their own after February 20, 2014. CTO initiated limited in-building spot testing of the Maryland FiRST system within Wicomico County on February 27, 2014, which included a majority of the sites identified by the county currently operating on BDAs. The county radio division has indicated that one of the goals of the new system is to cease operation of the BDAs.

Corpor

3.2.2 AU

Radio cocenter anFiRST baWicomicoas its sono redunFCC liceresponde One of thbackhauis not comicrowavaugmentrecommethe existmicrowavredundanMaryland Figure III-1

Conceptssolving tConceptscould be

rate Offices: 801

UGMENTED

ommunicationd to/from thackhaul syso County alsle backhaul

ndancy for genses for aler is the bac

he key issuel. As noted ionnected to ve and no fted system, ended, it woting fiber loove path to nency in the Md FiRST syst

16 Proposed A

s To Operatthe single ps To Operata viable opt

Evaluat

Compass Way,

SYSTEM B

ns backhauhe mobiles astem is entirso relies uposystem for t

getting its sigl transfer ofkbone of the

es outstandinin Section 3the MIEMS

fiber optic syas outlined

ould have baop within theew tower, as

Maryland FiRtem.

Augmentation

tions has dispoint of failutions believetion with the

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

BACKHAUL

l (getting theand portablerely designeon the MIEMthe 800 MHgnals to firsf informatione Maryland F

ng for the M.1.10, one o

SS network ystem, creatin this reco

ackhaul redue city. In ads well as FruRST system

n of MIEMSS M

scussed thisure problemes that nego

State of Ma


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 43 <<

e signal frome) is a criticad around th

MSS microwz analog. Tht respondersn and commFiRST syste

Maryland FiRof the existin

(Fruitland) ting a “singl

ommendationundancy; thddition, the cuitland and t

m and remov

Microwave Bac

s option with as well astiation for pa

aryland.


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

m the tower aal element ofhe existing M

wave links loche existing 8rs. The use munications

em.

RST systemng state towand two of le point of fn, with the ae Milestoneconnection he ten (10) ave one of th

ckhaul

h MIEMSS, ws augmentinartial funding


24-8911 – cto@c

antenna to/ff any netwoMIEMSS miccated in and800 MHz anof the micro between d

is the lack oers only hasthe state to

failure” for thaddition of t

e site would and upgradadditional linhe major we

which was vng the overag of the fibe


concepts2ops.co

from the disprk. The Marycrowave sysd near the conalog systemowave pathsdispatch and

of redundancs fiber opticsowers havehe system. he one (1) tbe connect

de of the exnks, would ceaknesses o

very supportall state sys

er connection

ounty tem(s)

om

patch yland stem. ounty

m has s and d first

cy for s and

e only In an tower ted to isting

create of the

ive in stem. n that

Corpor

Figure III-1

3.2.3 TO

Conceptsthe towe

U U C

( 3.2.4 CO

Conceptsthe optio

rate Offices: 801

17 Proposed A

WER ANAL

s To Operatrs and its co

Upgrade of PUpgrade of PCollocation osee Section

OST ANALYS

s To Operatns and their

Infra NG9 Mob Cos Syst

Evaluat

Compass Way,

Augmentation

LYSIS

ions has sepoverage. Opt

Pittsville towPoplar Hill toon Milestone 4.2.9 for de

SIS

tions has pror cost includi

astructure 9-1-1 CPE biles and porst of installattem mainten

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

n of Fiber Back

parated out,tion 3 would

wer (see Sectower (see See tower or coetails)

ovided, in Sng:

rtables ion nance costs


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 44 <<

khaul

in Section Irequire the:

tion 4.2.3 foection 4.2.4 onstruction o

Section V, a


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

V of this rep:

r details) for details)

of new tower

comprehens


24-8911 – cto@c

port, a full an

r at Bennett

sive cost an


concepts2ops.co

nalysis of ea

School Com

nalysis of ea

ounty tem(s)

om

ach of

mplex

ach of




>> Page 45 <<

3.3 OPTION 3 – NEW STANDALONE P25 PHASE II 800 MHZ RADIO SYSTEM

The RFP for Evaluation of Upgrade Options for the Public Safety Trunked Radio System released by Wicomico County on June 25, 2013 requested a thorough analysis of the existing 800 MHz analog system and the evaluation for a new P25 Phase II compliant 800 MHz digital communications system. In the design and development of a communication system, Concepts To Operations recommends keeping six (6) key points in mind:

(1) Channel capacity for current and future needs (2) Sustainability in a major weather event (3) In-building talk-out and talk-back with consistent with IFC Section 510 (4) Comprehensive coverage for first responders (5) Redundancy with interconnections (6) Interoperability with other public safety agencies

In development of the overall design of a system, CTO has the following basic assumptions: Channel Capacity – the ability of Wicomico County to provide voice and data from dispatcher to first responder without loss of voice quality (DAQ – Delivered Audio Quality), without loss of service to other operations, without busy signals, and without having to choose between sending information or not sending information due to system limitations. Sustainability – the ability of the communication system infrastructure to withstand a Category 2 hurricane direct hit in Ocean City (wind speeds 120 mph), as defined by ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G for critical structures (Class III). In-Building Coverage – the ability of a fully-geared firefighter, or any other first responder, to have continuous clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) in low-density, medium-density, and high-density buildings, throughout the county with a DAQ of 3.4 or better. Comprehensive Coverage – the ability to have clear and uninterrupted communications (talk-out and talk-back) on-street and in-building, to include residential houses, office buildings, contemporary large multi-story buildings (office and apartment), hospitals, college campuses, county schools, and primary facilities, without the need for additional BDAs. Redundancy – the ability of a complete communications system to be designed and operated without a single point of failure for communications between dispatch and field personnel. Redundancy in public safety communications systems is a method of insurance against failure of primary system functionality. Interoperability – the ability to communicate without loss of signal and without the need for each interoperability user to carry multiple radios operating on multiple frequency bands. In Wicomico County, this would include the City of Salisbury, Salisbury University, departments within the county, neighboring counties, State of Maryland agencies, State of Delaware agencies, and federal agencies.

Corpor

The resusystem. TCounty c The desi

Due to existing Figure IIcoveragebuildings Figure III-1

rate Offices: 801

ult of the anThe system

communicati

gn for a new

Reconstru Would req

and Pittsv The upgra The const

Section 4 Construct Construct Construct The upgra The repla The repla The repla

the extensand propos

I-18 represee in the highs for the rem

18 Proposed 8

Evaluat

Compass Way,

alysis was t, as designeons project t

w 800 MHz P

uction of thequire construville state towade (state totruction of a .2.9) tion of 17 mition of 10 netion of a newade of 188 r

acement of 8acement of 1acement of 1

sive evaluased towers

ents the apph-density buaining count

800 MHz Sites

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

the theoreticed, meets thteam.

P25 System

e Naylor Mill uction of sidwers (see Seower) at Frui

new county

iles of fiber oew microwavw radio mainradios 8 consoles

primary ser,942 with ne

ation of infin Section

proximate locuilding corridty areas.

Only


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 46 <<

cal design ohe six (6) cri

would includ

tower at 411e by side towections 4.2.4tland (see S

y owned tow

optic cable love links to autenance and

rver and 8 linew units (mo

frastructureIV.

cation of sixdor and in-b


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

of a new six itical objectiv

de the follow

1 Naylor Milwers at Pop4, 4.2.10, an

Section 4.2.7wer at the Be

oops ugment the Md operation f

nked operatobiles and po

e (towers),

x (6) sites thuilding cove


24-8911 – cto@c

(6) site P25ves set out

wing:

l (see Sectioplar Hill, Mardnd 4.2.3) 7) nnett Schoo

MIEMSS sysfacility

ing servers ortables)

CTO has

hat would prerage of me


concepts2ops.co

5 Phase II dby the Wico

on 4.2.2) dela Springs

ol Complex (

stems

fully discu

rovide in-buedium/low-de

ounty tem(s)

om

digital omico

s,

see

ssed

ilding ensity

Corpor

3.3.1 SY

Conceptsbuilding include:

3.3.2 VO

The chaquality ofsignals uliterally d Figure III-1

Conceptsradio com

rate Offices: 801

STEM FUNC

s To Operatcoverage, a

P25 Phas Sufficient Priority ch Ability for A system Sustainab Compreh Redundan Encryptio Seamless NG9-1-1 s

OICE QUALIT

nge from anf voice rece

under the anadrops at that

19 Analog vs.

s To Operatmmunication

Evaluat

Compass Way,

CTIONALIT

tions believeand eliminate

se II digital rachannel and

hannel optioportable talto be user f

bility in a maensive covency (micrown

s interoperabscalability

TY LEVEL

n 800 MHz ption and ovalog systempoint as sho

Digital (court

tions utilizesns system. T

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

Y IN 800 MH

es that the nes interopera

adio systemd system can(s) k around grofriendly withajor weather rage for first

wave and fibe

bility

analog sysverall covera

m typically woown in Figur

tesy of M/A-CO

s a number The standard


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 47 <<

HZ SYSTEM

new systemsability issue

apacity to pro

oups and taceasy accessevent (120 mt responderser)

stem to an 8age area. Arould have nore III-19 belo

OM)

of standardsds include:


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

M

s should proes. Some cri

ovide NG9-1

ctical channs mph) s (in-building

800 MHz direas that exo signal in a ow.

s to evaluat


24-8911 – cto@c

ovide on-stretical elemen

1-1 features

els

g DAQ of 3.4

igital systemxperienced fa

digital netw

te level of v


concepts2ops.co

eet coveragnts of the sy

4 or better)

m alters botade and droork, as the s

oice quality

ounty tem(s)

om

e, in-ystem

h the opped signal

for a




>> Page 48 <<

Strength of signal Quality of transmissions No dropped signals Talk-out and talk-back continuity

Concepts To Operations believes that a radio system should be based on a voice quality level of no lower than DAQ 3.4, which provides that voice quality from talk-out be rarely compromised by noise.

Table III-1 Delivered Audio Quality Delivered

Audio Quality Subjective Performance Description DAQ 5.0 Speech easily understood DAQ 4.5 Speech easily understood; infrequent noise/distortion DAQ 4.0 Speech easily understood; occasional noise/distortion DAQ 3.4

Speech understandable with repetition only rarely required; some noise/distortion

DAQ 3.0

Speech understandable with slight effort; occasional repetition required due to noise/distortion

DAQ 2.0

Understandable with considerable effort; frequent repetition due to noise/distortion

DAQ 1.0 Unusable; speech present, but unreadable In the development of a public safety radio system design Concepts To Operations follows standards set forth in 2009 International Building Code Section 915 for emergency responders’ radio coverage believes that all coverage (on-street and in-building) should be in accordance with the International Fire Code Section 510 which sets forth the following standards:

510.4.1 Radio signal strength. The building shall be considered to have acceptable emergency responder radio coverage when signal strength measurements in 95% of all areas of the building and 99% in elevators (measured at the primary recall floor), stair shafts and Fire Command Centers meet the signal strength requirements in Sections 510.4.1.1 and 510.4.1.2. 510.4.1.1 Minimum signal strength into the building. Minimum signal strength of -95 dBm shall be receivable within the building. 510.4.1.2 Minimum signal strength out of the building. Minimum signal strength of -95 dBm shall be received by the agency’s radio system when transmitted from within the building. 510.4.2 System Design. The emergency responder radio coverage system shall be designed in accordance with Sections 510.4.2.1 through 510.4.2.5.

3.3.3 COVERAGE OF RADIO SYSTEM

Based upon IFC Section 510 standards, Concepts To Operations determined the design should include the following signal strengths:

On-street -95 dBm Low-density (residential wood buildings) -83 dBm

Corpor

MH

In laymastrength antennasand the ca new scompensbuilding. coveragetheir syst Conceptssignal losmedium-Operatioevents (Nyears). Tof failurecurrent communfirefighte With pubmost putechnologsoftware years oucreate ancontinuedOperatiosystem. Figure III-2

The exiscoverageunreliable

rate Offices: 801

Medium-denHigh-density

an’s terms, tand locatio

s) needs to closer a towsystem, CTOsate with caOur design

e area with 9tem as part o

s To Operatss will not o-density buildns’ design NWS predicThe system e. The systeand future ications. CTr located in a

blic safety coublic safety gical advancevery 18 m

ut of date. Cn open platfd wholesalens has take

20 Existing 80

sting analog e has beene for clarity

Evaluat

Compass Way,

nsity (commy (hospitals

to compensaon of antenbe increase

wer or more pO looks to alculating an also has th

97% reliabilitof the RFP p

tions takes aoccur in a mdings, and ais aimed at

cts a major hdesign paraem, as conc

FCC ruleTO’s designa high-dens

ommunicatiocommunica

ces. Most oonths. It is n

CTO notes thform environe replacemen with the

00 MHz Covera

system pro described . The board

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

mercial cindes and contem

ate for the nnas (i.e., aed. The denpower to an compensaten additionalhe requiremety. At this levprocess and

a conservatimajority of the

almost all oft providing ahurricane ev

ameters incluceived, is des and reg assumptioity building.

on system coations syste

of the major not uncommhat the primnment allowient of harddesign of

age (on-street

ovides someas: (1) inc

d of educatio


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 49 <<

erblock buimporary bu

loss of voicadditional tonser the buil

antenna is e for the si loss of 6ent for a vevel, all of the implementa

ve approache high-densf the low-dea system wvent will hit tuded redundesigned to

gulations asns include

omponents cems acrossvendors areon for jurisd

mary objectivng “changesdware. Thisa new stan

) Figure

e in-buildingonsistent; (on, in an ef


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ildings) -77uildings) -65

ce quality duower and thlding materianeeded for ignal loss adB for a fundor to meee vendors shation.

h to modelinsity buildingsensity buildinwhich is hard

the Marylandancy of bacbe interopes well asstrength of

changing evs the coune issuing ch

dictions to have of APCO s” to occur ws is the apndalone P25

III-21 Propose

g coverage 2) unavailaffort to impr


24-8911 – cto@c

dBm 5 dBm

ue to buildinhe power gal the highethe penetrat

as noted abully-geared et a 3.4 DAQhould be wil

ng and desigs in the counng. In additidened to w

nd Eastern Sckhaul withoerable and s

technologicsignal with

very 24 monttry have fa

hanges and ave versions

and the P2with softwarpproach tha5 Phase II

ed 800 MHz C

to first respble in most

rove safety,


concepts2ops.co

ng materialsenerated by

er the signation. In desigbove, as wefirefighter inQ for 97% oling to guara

gn to ensurenty, a majoron, Concepithstand weShore everyout a single scalable to cal change

h a fully dre

ths, the FCCallen far beupgrades t

s that are 4 a25 project wre rather thaat Concept800 MHz d

overage (on-s

ponders, butt areas; animplemente

ounty tem(s)

om

s, the y the l loss gning ell as n the of the antee

e that rity of ts To

eather y 16.2

point meet

es to essed

C and ehind o the and 5

was to an the s To digital

street)

t that d (3)

ed in-

Corpor

building Medical Ca comprgovernm The FCCbuilding lwith it” oFCC PS technolog(horizontless than The FCCupgradesmore thacitizens osystem. CTO mopenetrati A majoripenetratifamily rescoveragedensely f Figure III-2

Conceptsconcrete of comm

rate Offices: 801

Bi-DirectionaCenter took rehensive Bent facilities

C is movinglocation infon providing Docket 07-1gy for in-butal and verticn expected b

C notes that s. Fewer eman 340 millioof Wicomico

odeled in-buon. The resu

ty of the buon buildingssidential type of these aforested are

22 Proposed 8

s To Operaconstructio

unication wi

Evaluat

Compass Way,

al Amplifier a similar apDA system.

s where in-bu

g toward rermation, incthat informa114, the FCuilding withincal location).by the comm

“consumer mergency caon wireless do County wi

uilding coveults of that m

uildings outss. The buildipe buildings areas. The as in the cou

800 MHz Cove

tions modeln and gardeth a fully-ge

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

(BDA) systepproach to im. Additional uilding comm

equiring comluding floor

ation to first C has requen 3 to 5 ye. Coverage a

mercial carrie

expectationalls are beingdevices in oill require th

erage undermodeling are

side of the Rngs are mosof less than two (2) areunty where t

erage (in-build

led the in-ben style aparared firefigh


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 50 <<

ems in sevemproving saf

BDAs weremunications

mmercial caand room deresponders

ested commears, which and signal s

ers and the c

s” are the dg generated

operation in the developm

r the new e detailed be

Route 13 costly constructhree (3) stoas of coverthe signal is

ing low-densi

uilding covertments) utiliter (6 dB los


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

eral of their sfety in their e installed was critical.

arriers to pretail. It is alswithout lossents on the includes x,

strength for fcitizens of the

driving force d from traditithe US, mee

ment of a so

6-site systeelow.

orridor can cted of woodories. The arage gaps, absorbed b

ity)

erage of meizing a level ss).


24-8911 – cto@c

schools. Pefacility with tin several i.

rovide PSAso urging evs of voice coimplementa y, and z Gfirst responde county.

behind the ional wirelineting the exophisticated

em for in-bu

be classified materials,

above designshown on F

by the foliage

edium-densit of strength


concepts2ops.co

eninsula Regthe installatiindividual co

Ps with detvery PSAP toommunicatioation of locatGPS coordinders should b

need for sye locations.

xpectations ocommunica

uilding cove

ed as low-degenerally si

n supports sFigure III-22e.

ty buildings ensuring no

ounty tem(s)

om

gional ion of ounty

tailed o “get on. In tional nates be no

ystem With

of the ations

erage

ensity ingle-

strong 2, are

(i.e., o loss

Corpor

Figure III-2

Certain pother macounty abuildingschurches Upon congrowth, adesign pwith empcenter. Ccorridor,

rate Offices: 801

23 Proposed 8

portions of taterials usedas medium-s, as showns, 3-4 story a

nsultation was well as erovides stro

phasis on buConcepts Toas shown in

Evaluat

Compass Way,

800 MHz Cove

he county hd in the 199density. Th

n above in apartment bu

ith the Wicoempirical eving in-buildinildings in theo Operationn Figure III-2

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

erage (in-build

have structur90s, Concepe six (6) sFigure III-2

uildings, mo

mico Countydence of ex

ng coverage e City of Sals focused o

24 below.


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 51 <<

ing medium-d

res that are pts To Operaite design

23. These tydern retail, a

y Planning Dxisting buildion either siisbury, Salison providing


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

density)

more modeations has cprovides sigypes of buand commer

Department aing structureide of Routesbury Univerg strong un


24-8911 – cto@c

ern; made wclassified thgnificant coildings inclurcial building

and observaes, Concepte 13 from Dersity, and cointerrupted


concepts2ops.co

with concreteese areas o

overage to tude the schgs.

ations of potes To Opera

elmar to Fruounty govern

coverage in

ounty tem(s)

om

e and of the those hools,

ential tions’ itland

nment n this

Corpor

Figure III-2

CTO’s ddevelopm

(1(2(3(4

Conceptson eitherWicomicoand the u Conceptsto the enand crearural natuthat futurto sewer/high-den

rate Offices: 801

24 Proposed 8

design for cment of:

1) Future wa2) New cam3) New mid-4) New mid-

s To Operatr side of Roo County Aduniversity.

s To Operattire county.

ate substanture of a majre developm/water infrassity structure

Evaluat

Compass Way,

800 MHz Cove

coverage of

aste to energpus building

-rise apartme-rise building

ions classifieoute 13, fromdministration

tions evaluaSuch a desi

tial interferenjority of the

ment would bstructure andes be done f

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

erage (in-build

high-densit

gy facility (negs; ent buildingsgs housing e

ed the countm Delmar ton Building, fi

ted a designgn would rence issues county coup

be forced intd the Chesafor the entire


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 52 <<

ing high-dens

ty buildings

ear the exist

s housing stuelderly for ag

ty core (higho Fruitland. re stations,

n that wouldequire the codue to the pled with theto the corrid

apeake Bay, e county.


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

sity)

also takes

ting landfill);

udents; and ging in place

h-density buiThis core inthe Sheriff’s

d provide higonstruction olocation of te discussion

dor due to fe it is not rec


24-8911 – cto@c

s into accou

e options

ildings) as ancludes the s Departmen

gh-density bof in excess othe towers. n of the planederal and scommended


concepts2ops.co

unt the prob

a 2.0 mile cohospital, co

nt, the count

building coveof 25 new toBased upo

nning departstate laws re

that a desig

ounty tem(s)

om

bable

rridor ourts, ty jail,

erage owers n the tment elated gn for

Corpor

Figure III-2building h

Conceptsprime sitproviding 3.3.4 EN

During thto move between County mtheir useresponsi 3.3.5 PA

The Saliscombinatcurrent s 3.3.6 SY

Other thabelieves channelsbeing utioperate system cNG9-1-1 WicomicoUnder Finterfereninterferenloss of aMHz reb

rate Offices: 801

25 Existing 80high-density)

s To Operatte meets theg excessive a

CRYPTION

he interview toward a sdispatch, fir

may requeste. This encble for purch

AGING SYST

sbury Fire Dtion of appro

system. The

STEM CAPA

an the “endthat the si

s on which lized by thean encrypte

capacity will type data in

o County is CC rules, ance contournce (1 to 3)

any channelsanding proc

Evaluat

Compass Way,

00 MHz Covera

ions believee county reqand un-nece

portion of thsingle encryprst respondet that one ofcryption wohasing and u

TEM

Department aoximately 70new system

ACITY

of life cycleingle largesWicomico C board of ed

ed channel only be exa

nformation o

well aware an existing r of 22 dBchannels d

s in an emecess concern

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

age (zoomed

es the six (6)quirements fessary cover

his project, lapted channeers, and supf the channeuld be an

upgrading th

and the volu00 Minitor II

m would allow

e” classificast issue is tCounty curreducation andand Mobile

acerbated innto the exist

of the lack ochannel ha

Bu. While Wdue to eitherergency situaning movem


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 53 <<

in-

Figure in-build

) site designfor in-buildinrage to the r

aw enforcemel to be useport cannot

els on the Mexpense fo

e Maryland

unteer fire de, Minitor III,

w for the con

tion for the the present ently operatd the bus dr

e Data Termn the near futing seven (7

of available as a serviceWicomico Cr an adjacenation is acceent of opera


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

III-26 Proposding high-den

with the cong coveragerural areas o

ment systemed to ensurebe listened

Maryland FiRor which WFiRST syste

epartments Minitor IV,

ntinued use o

existing 800and future

tes. With mrivers, the a

minals (MDTuture by the7) channels.

800 MHz che area cont

County current FCC liceneptable. Durations to pub


24-8911 – cto@c

sed 800 MHz nsity)

rrespondinge where it isof the county

m subscriberse that certato by third p

RST system Wicomico Cem.

in Wicomicoand Minitor of the paging

0 MHz anale capacity oore than 31

ability of WicTs) are limite adoption a.

hannels covtour of 40 dently has snsee or unlicring the FCCblic safety ch


concepts2ops.co

Coverage (zo

g relocation os needed wiy.

s voiced a dain conversaparties. Wicobe encrypte

County woul

o County utiV pagers o

g.

og system, of the seve1% of the racomico Counted. This laand moveme

vering the codBu and a

sporadic chacensed useC mandatedhannels sep

ounty tem(s)

om

oomed

of the ithout

desire ations omico ed for d be

lize a on the

CTO n (7) adios nty to ck of

ent of

ounty. non-

annel r, the d 800 parate




>> Page 54 <<

from commercial channels, Wicomico County found no additional channels available for their use. CTO notes that it is possible that, with the movement of some of the jurisdictions on the Eastern Shore onto the Maryland FiRST system, some 800 MHz channels will become available in the future. However, it is likely that all of the other Eastern Shore jurisdictions would fight the RPC if there was a demand to return un-used or less used spectrum for re-assignment. The frequency band presently used by public safety systems can only accommodate so many users sharing the spectrum. Traditionally, analog radio modulation methods such as AM and FM limited the amount of information conveyed within a given channel, and each channel could only host a single conversation at any one time - a pair of users, one transmitting and one receiving.

Analog Modulation (AM) places a very finite limit on the number of users that can occupy the radio spectrum, and does not cater well to today’s expanding needs.

Digital radio, using various modulation schemes, is moving to alleviate this problem by increasing the amount of information that can be conveyed on a channel.

Digital radio has developed ways in which more than one conversation can be accommodated (multiplexed) inside the same physical RF channel. There are three common ways of achieving this:

1. Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) 2. Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) 3. Code Divisional Multiple Access (CDMA)

TDMA is a technology for delivering digital wireless service using Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM). TDMA technology divides a radio frequency into time slots in order to increase the amount of data that can be carried, and then allocates these time slots to multiple channels, see Figure III-27. In this way, a single frequency can support multiple, simultaneous conversations. The receiving equipment must be able to decode the received signal by demultiplexing the signal and reconstituting it using the same timeslot selection algorithm as was used when it was encoded and transmitted (multiplexed).

Corpor

Figure III-2

In the diain a quar With theimplemedispatch planning requirem The FCCup channthat by narrowbarecommewith the compatib 3.3.7 SU

Individuaemergensystem hspecific italkgroup(installed

rate Offices: 801

27 Time Divisi

agram, the crter of the tim

e implementntation of thto the first rfor future o

ment for addit

C mandate fonels, will de2018, the

anding step ends that the

three (3) ble with Phas

BSCRIBER

als who utilizncy) are refehas differenindividual, ops. As notedd in a vehicle

Evaluat

Compass Way,

ion Multiple A

channel is spme taken to s

tation of Fihe radio sysresponder woperations otional chann

or continuedecrease the

FCC will bfor public sa

e system bemajor radiose I and with

R EQUIPMEN

ze the publicerred to in tnt needs anor respondind in Sectione) is the larg

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

Access (TDMA)

plit into four tsay it.

rstNet broatem (NG9-1

will become pof the radio nels.

d narrowbanlikelihood o

begin workiafety in the ing designed

o vendors, Ch analog inte

NT

c safety radithe industryd different g to differen

n V, the cosest portion o


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 55 <<

) Graph (cour

time slots, so

dband in th-1), data an

paramount. Wsystem wit

nding to 6.25f interferencng on the 800 MHz fred and built bCTO has aeroperability

o system foy as subscrirequirementnt calls. Thest of a portaof the system


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

rtesy of Tait Co

o in each slo

he 700 MHnd the abilityWicomico Cthout taking

5 kHz channce from othe

rules and equency ba

be a P25 Phascertained

partners.

or communicibers. Each ts for accesese groups able radio (hm costs.


24-8911 – cto@c

ommunication

ot the speec

Hz frequencyy to transpo

County would into accou

nels, while der operation

requiremennd. Concepase II systemthat Phase

cations (emesubscriber

ssing informare generahandheld) o


concepts2ops.co

ns)

ch is transmi

y band andort that data d be remiss nt the need

doing little tons. CTO belnts for the ts To Operam. In discuse II is back

ergency andwho utilize

mation, talkinlly referred

or a mobile

ounty tem(s)

om

tted

d the from in its

d and

o free ieves next

ations sions

kward

non-s the ng to to as radio




>> Page 56 <<

Concepts To Operations’ has reviewed the existing inventory and classified the mobiles and portables into several useable categories for the purposes of this report. Concepts To Operations’ evaluation of existing radios was assessed for compatibility (either operating on 700/800 MHz digital or capable of being programmed using flash programming for upgrade to 700/800 MHz digital) or non-compatibility (incapable of either operating on or being upgraded to operations on the 700/800 MHz digital system) for the purposes of this report.



The Wicomico County Board of Education comprises nearly 31% of the radios (primarily mobiles installed in school buses) in operation. Law enforcement comprises 1% of the radios in operation (portables) and fire/EMS comprising nearly 33% of the radios in operation. The entire detailed inventory, as provided by the county, is in Appendix A. For utilization on the new system, CTO believes that the county acquisition program, after initial acquisition, will be approximately 1% per year, or 20 units per year (normal replacement rate for broken radios). CTO believes that the system subscriber base will increase from its current 2,310 units to 2,430 over the lifetime of the new radio system. One of the primary purposes of the development by APCO of the P25 system platform was the requirement that all vendors use the same standard (i.e., you are not constrained to one vendor, and can receive competitive bids from multiple providers). In the past, if you operated on a Motorola system you needed Motorola mobiles and portables. The P25 standard allows for a vendor or combination of vendors to provide Wicomico County with P25 radios that operate on any vendor system (i.e., Harris, Kenwood, Motorola Solutions, etc.). 3.3.8 800 MHZ P25 PHASE II SCALABILITY

Concepts To Operations notes that NENA has recently recommended the adoption of i3 architecture that would support the movement of voice to an IP-based system as well as supporting the radio system for NG9-1-1 implementation. While outside of the scope of this report, Concepts To Operations would recommend that at the time of the upgrade of the system, the county work with Verizon to move all of the public safety communication architecture to the NENA i3 network platform. 3.3.9 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY

Law enforcement and fire agencies within Wicomico County have mutual-aid agreements and response areas outside the county. The mutual-aid response requires interoperability with neighboring counties, law enforcement, fire departments, EMS, emergency management, and MSP. Some of the interoperability partners identified in the 800 MHz rebanding process include:




>> Page 57 <<

Maryland State Police (MSP) City of Salisbury Dorchester County Somerset County Worcester County MIEMSS Delaware State Police City of Ocean City Sussex County Delaware Salisbury University Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Department of Natural Resources Maryland Emergency Management Talbot County

The transfer from analog to digital new countywide 800 MHz system will have an impact on the mobiles and portables used by the above agencies. As noted in Sections 3.3.6 and 3.4.5, the county has upgraded a number of radios to allow for the reception of digital 800 MHz signals as well as access to the 700 MHz Maryland FiRST statewide emergency channel. Most of the new P25 enabled mobiles and portables are capable of receiving 700 MHz signals. Continued reception from those entities that use non- 700/800 MHz system will have to rely upon patching and cross–patching to maintain interoperability with the county system. 3.3.10 DATA REQUIREMENTS (CURRENT AND FUTURE)

As outlined in the Section 6.1 of this report, CTO’s view of the future includes tremendous changes to data and its transmission, reception, storage and use. The implementation of NG9-1-1 will become the driving force for changes in communications between dispatch and first responder in the near future. Movement by first responders to have access to information prior to responding to a call and while they are on scene will require the use of multi-level and multi- jurisdictional cooperation and a robust communications system. Concepts To Operations believes that the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board will be tasked with a challenge to keep up with maintaining the large Maryland FiRST system with each of these technological changes, an expense that will be magnified by the size of the system. With NENA recommending the movement to IP-based i3 network architecture for public safety voice and data communications, CTO believes that the new radio system for Wicomico County needs to be scalable to implement these features at the option of the system operations. Public safety communications in the future (NG9-1-1) will be dominated by expectations of the public that their public safety communications capabilities should mirror commercial capabilities. While data transmission in the past has been primarily MDT oriented data, in the near future it will encompass a much greater range and degree of inputs into the radio communication system. Those inputs include:

Voice over LTE Adoption of Text-to-911




>> Page 58 <<

Adoption of Picture-to-911 (NG9-1-1 future) Adoption of Video-to-911 (NG9-1-1 future) Adoption of VoIP Adoption of LTE and VoLTE Adoption and use of the cloud (internal and external)

3.3.11 TOWER ANALYSIS

Concepts To Operations has separated out, in Section IV, of this report, an analysis of each of the towers. Option 3 would require:

New Naylor Mill tower (see Section 4.2.2 for details) New Pittsville tower (see Section 4.2.3 for details) New Poplar Hill tower (see Section 4.2.4 for details) New tower at Mardela Springs (see Section 4.2.10 for details) Upgrade of Fruitland tower (see Section 4.2.2 for details) New tower at Bennett School Complex (see Section 4.2.9 for details)

3.3.12 COST ANALYSIS

Concepts To Operations has provided, in Section V, a comprehensive cost analysis of each of the options, including:

Infrastructure NG9-1-1 CPE Mobiles and portables Cost of installation System maintenance costs

3.4 OPTION 4 – 700/800 MHZ HYBRID P25 PHASE II DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEM

The 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system would serve as an upgrade/replacement to the existing 800 MHz system with added interoperability capabilities, additional channel capacity, and utilization of identified infrastructure from the Maryland FiRST system. The fourth option Concepts To Operations evaluated during this study was the development of a hybrid communication system, taking advantage of portions of the Maryland FiRST/Maryland State property and infrastructure, with the benefits of a new standalone P25 Phase II 800 MHz system (Option 3) controlled by the county, and with added channel capacity from the Maryland FiRST system, including ISSI interface with the Delaware State Police. Utilizing State of Maryland owned real property will allow Wicomico County to avoid acquiring additional real property at its expense for placement of Option 4 towers. Concepts To Operations’ analysis of a hybrid system is based upon a number of key factors for the new public safety radio system, which a standalone 800 MHz P25 system cannot deliver (Option 3). In the past, the public safety communications system has been designed as a voice system with dispatch to first responder providing voice information and apparatus response. In the future, the PSAP will operate as a gatehouse of information including: (1) x, y, z coordinates for exact location of caller; (2) streaming video and pictures from the incident; (3) direct access




>> Page 59 <<

of first responders in the field to large multi-jurisdictional databases; and (4) the use of the cloud for providing key incident information (real time). In assessing the development of a hybrid system Concepts To Operations reviewed:

a. The current capacity of the 800 MHz channels licensed to Wicomico County b. The likelihood of new 800 MHz channels becoming available to Wicomico County c. The availability of 700 MHz channels from Maryland FiRST d. The projected need for substantial bandwidth to provide future technology e. The projected applications of information and access to the cloud

The design for a new 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital system would include all of the improvements noted in Option 3 with the additional software for interoperability. As notes in Option 3, the new system would require:

Reconstruction of the Naylor Mill tower at 411 Naylor Mill (see Section 4.2.2) Would require construction of side by side towers at Poplar Hill, Mardela Springs,

and Pittsville state towers (see Sections 4.2.4, 4.2.10, and 4.2.3) The upgrade (state tower) at Fruitland (see Section 4.2.7) The construction of a new county owned tower at the Bennett School Complex (see

Section 4.2.9) Construction of 17 miles of fiber optic cable loops Construction of 10 new microwave links to augment the MIEMSS systems Construction of a new radio maintenance and operation facility The upgrade of 188 radios The replacement of 8 consoles The replacement of 1 primary server and 8 linked operating servers The replacement of 1,942 with new units (mobiles and portables)

Due to the extensive evaluation of infrastructure (towers), CTO has fully discussed existing and proposed towers in Section IV. 3.4.1 LACK OF CHANNEL CAPACITY

One of the concerns that Concepts To Operations raised in this report is the ability to control the operation of the new radio system without having capacity limitations. While the current operations of the system have some limitations including: (1) nonuse of MDTs which were purchased; (2) non-encryption; and (3) channel interference, in large part the operation of the system and the call volume generated have not exceeded the capacity of the system. CTO notes that throughout this report, the issue of capacity for data and for the implementation of various aspects of NG9-1-1 is of great concern. While not all of the NG9-1-1 has been completely defined, it is likely that during the lifetime of this radio system, Wicomico County will need capacity and equipment to receive and send:

(1) Text-to-911 to first responders (2) Picture-to-911 and to first responders (3) Video-to-911 and to first responders (4) Use the cloud (internal and external) for system operations as well as access to

statewide crime and incident information

Corpor

As outlinchannelsthe future At the cuallocatednot the schannelsFiRST. 3.4.2 CO

Conceptsimplemebetween that provInternatiocalculatehybrid sy The systa tower providing Figure III-2

rate Offices: 801

ned in Optios on the Mare, placing th

urrent time, td for local ussame as deds as perman

OVERAGE O

s To Operantation of andispatch an

vides a levonal Fire Coed dB loss, ystem beginn

em infrastrulocated in

g the 3.4 DA

28 Hybrid 700/

Evaluat

Compass Way,

on 3 Sectioryland Eastee safety of it

the Marylandse in Wicomdicated andnent channe

OF RADIO S

ations and tny new radiond first respoel of voice ode, Sectionwhich must

ning from tha

cture designthe City of

AQ in high-de

/800 MHz Cov

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

on 3.3.6, thern Shore forts citizens at

d FiRST sysmico County assured fo

els for Wico

SYSTEM

the project o system is tonder in all b

quality of n 510. Sectit be made uat premise.

n is consisteSalisbury i

ensity buildin

verage (in-build


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 60 <<

here is insur Wicomico Ct risk.

stem, as eva. As noted ir the future.mico County

team have the ability to building in th

DAQ 3.4 oion 510 indup for with

ent with Optis the elemeng throughou

ding high-den


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ufficient exisCounty to “h

aluated in Sein that secti. Option 4 wy’s use with

ensured thprovide voice county. Th

or better is icates for esignal stren

on 3 noted ient that maut the city.

nsity)


24-8911 – cto@c

sting or exphope” that th

ection 3.1.17on, allocatio

would move hout the con

hat the key ce and datahe decision

based stanach building

ngth. CTO h

in this reporakes the sy


concepts2ops.co

pected 800 ere is capac

7, has 2 chaon of channe to solidify tntrol of Mary

element fo communicato build a syndards fromg type therehas modeled

rt. The additistem capab

ounty tem(s)

om

MHz city in

nnels els is those yland

or the ations ystem m the e is a d the

ion of ble of

Corpor

The 700/provide cshown be Figure III-2

The 700/street anthe counchannelsFiRST ha 3.4.3 SY

The FedCommissregion tofrequencinterferenof a chanyears, thchannelsthe expeand utiliz Outside operationenforcem

rate Offices: 801

/800 MHz hycomprehenselow.

29 Hybrid 700/

/800 hybrid nd low-densitnty would has allowing bas noted tha

STEM LOA

deral Commsions (RPC’o appropriatecies betweennce. Due to nnel is a veryhe FCC’s ws, and more nse of public

ze additional

the scope ons team, did

ment commu

Evaluat

Compass Way,

ybrid radio ssive in-buildin

/800 MHz Cov

system wouty buildings ave the optietter use of

at they may r

DING (GRA

munications s) the respoe users Then regions ethe limits ofy important

wholesale atefficient opec safety com 800 MHz ch

of this RFPd some initiaunications co

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

ystem, like tng coverage

verage (in-build

uld also provas shown bion of whichf channels arequire a “gr

ADE OF SER

Commissiononsibility to me RFP also ensuring thaf channels thcommodity. ttempt at foerations to frmmunicationhannels and

, Concepts al testing ofould be utiliz


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 61 <<

the 800 MHze across the

ding medium-

vide almost telow. With t

h operationsand the abirade of servi

RVICE)

n (FCC) hamonitor and is responsib

at all channehat have beCTO and th

orcing publicree up “aucts. CTO belie

d 700 MHz c

To Operatif buildings tozed on the


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

z standalonee county for

-density)

total coverathe implemes *subscribelity to add dce” to determ

as delegated allocate ch

ble for the cels are opeen allocated

he county hac safety ention” spectrueves it is crithannels on t

ons, workino determineMaryland Fi


24-8911 – cto@c

e system, asmedium-den

ge across thentation of thers” would odata in the mine channe

d to the Rehannels and coordination erated in thd to public save watchedntities into fum for commtical for the cthe Marylan

ng with the e whether ceiRST system


concepts2ops.co

s designed wnsity building

he county fohe hybrid sysoperate on wfuture. Maryel allocation

egional Plancapacity in of channelse region wi

safety, the cod, over the lafewer and f

mercial carriecounty to acd FiRST sys

Maryland Fertain criticam or whethe

ounty tem(s)

om

would gs as

or on-stem, which yland .

nning each

s and ithout ontrol ast 15 fewer ers at cquire stem.

FiRST al law er the




>> Page 62 <<

lack of in-building coverage of the Maryland FiRST system would rule out the utilization of those channels for critical emergency response. The results of the extensive in-building testing will be reported separately from this report. CTO further notes that it is important to understand the future of communications systems and not look to current operations. The future is “DATA” and the tremendous amount of bandwidth the will be required to provide full data 2-way communications between the dispatch center and the first responder in the field. 3.4.4 FUTURE EXPANSION AND VIABILITY

Concepts To Operations notes that NENA has recently recommended the adoption of i3 architecture that would support the movement of voice to an IP-based system. This system would also allow for the efficient packetting of data in a TDMA format for optimal channel utilization While outside of the scope of this report, Concepts To Operations would recommend that at the time of the upgrade of the system, the county work with Verizon to move all of the public safety communication architecture to the NENA i3 platform. Concepts To Operations would further note that while LTE is currently in vogue as a pathway for commercial carriers to increase their bandwidth to support usage, movement to LTE at this time is not recommended. Concepts To Operations believes that the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board will adopt the i3 platform in the future for system operations. Concepts To Operations recommends that Wicomico County adopt the i3 platform from NENA as it moves forward on all changes to its communication system (public safety and non-public safety). 3.4.5 SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT

Individuals who utilize the public safety radio system for communications (emergency and non-emergency) are referred to in the industry as subscribers. Each subscriber who utilizes the system has different needs and different requirements for accessing information, talking to specific individual, or responding to different calls. These groups are generally referred to as talkgroups. As noted in Section V, the cost of portable (handheld) and mobile (installed in a vehicle) radios is the largest portion of the system costs. Concepts To Operations’ has reviewed the existing inventory and classified the mobiles and portables into several useable categories for the purposes of this report. Concepts To Operations’ evaluation of existing radios was assessed for compatibility (either operating on 700/800 MHz digital or capable of being programmed using flash programming for upgrade to 700/800 MHz digital) or non-compatibility (incapable of either operating on or being upgraded to operations on the 700/800 MHz digital system) for the purposes of this report.






>> Page 63 <<

The Wicomico County Board of Education comprises nearly 31% of the radios (primarily mobiles installed in school buses) in operation. Law enforcement comprises 17% of the radios in operation (portables) and fire/EMS comprising nearly 33% of the radios in operation. The entire detailed inventory, as provided by the county, is in Appendix A. For utilization on the new system, CTO believes that the county acquisition program, after initial procurement, will be approximately 1% per year, or 20 units per year (normal replacement rate for broken radios). CTO believes that the system subscriber base will increase from its current 2,130 units to 2,430 over the lifetime of the new radio system. One of the primary purposes of the development by APCO of the P25 system platform was the requirement that all vendors use the same standard (i.e., you are not constrained to one vendor, and can receive competitive bids from multiple providers). In the past, if you operated on a Motorola system you needed Motorola mobiles and portables. The P25 standard allows for a vendor or combination of vendors to provide Wicomico County with P25 radios that operate on any vendor system (i.e., Harris, Kenwood, Motorola Solutions, etc.). 3.4.6 SYSTEM CONTROL AND RELATIONSHIP TO MARYLAND FIRST

Concepts To Operations has noted in this report its concern over the governance of the system by the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board. As noted in Section 3.1.16, CTO is concerned that the legislatively mandated board members are not required to be named from counties that are using the system as a primary public safety communication system. The result is a potential lack of a substantial voice on the governance of the system by a primary user. The adoption of Option 4 the hybrid 700/800 MHz radio system will bring the issues outlined in Option 1, “Governance” (Section 3.1.16), back into focus. As noted in Section 3.1.16.1, the six critical elements, which Wicomico County needs to negotiate with the Control Board concerning utilization of any portion of the system, are:

1. Membership on the Control Board 2. Future cost of the Maryland FiRST system to Wicomico County 3. Guarantee of sufficient channels now for operation 4. Guarantee of sufficient channels for operation in the future with NG9-1-1 5. Control of future software and hardware upgrades by Maryland FiRST

mandated to Wicomico County 6. Maintenance, repair and replacement of Maryland FiRST infrastructure and

the cost to Wicomico County Unlike Option 1, Option 4 would allow the county to place less importance upon several of these critical issues. However, CTO believes that due to Maryland FiRST’s Software Upgrade Assurance contract any jurisdiction that is operating on the Maryland FiRST system (even 2 channels) will be required to upgrade their versions operating on the Customer Premise Equipment (CPE). 3.4.7 MUTUAL-AID AND INTEROPERABILITY

The most important element for consideration of the hybrid 700/800 MHz radio system is the decision that the Delaware State Police made to maintain all communications on their new 800




>> Page 64 <<

MHz system. This mutual-aid and interoperability issue has significant ramifications for operation on Maryland’s Eastern Shore in the Maryland FiRST system alone. Concepts To Operations notes that the Maryland FiRST system has installed an Inter RF Subsystem Interface (ISSI) 8000 to ensure that the Maryland FiRST system and the State of Delaware continue their mutual-aid and interoperability. The ISSI provides an interface for connecting Project 25 (P25) systems together. This allows users to roam onto other P25 systems providing network-to-network interoperability. The P25 ISSI is a network IP-based solution, which builds upon today’s P25 over the air “Common Air Interface” (CAI). A key advantage of wireline interoperability solutions is that systems of different system IDs, different user databases, and of different frequency bands can be interconnected. It allows public safety agencies to; utilize the coverage areas of existing connected networks, which might span thousands of square miles; maintain secure, encrypted traffic across the networks, if required; and roam on to connected networks while still communicating with home dispatcher. A P25 ISSI offers the following features:

Connect P25 trunked systems together Allows interconnection of different frequency bands Allows usage of system across different geographic locations Allows the interconnection of different manufacturers’ P25 equipment (that supports

ISSI) Allows use of different system IDs and user databases Maintains visibility across all connected networks, so personnel deployed to a distant

location are still in contact with their home dispatchers and commanders Maintains several call management features across systems, including group calls,

emergency calls, and end-to-end encryption Establishes interoperability talkgroups with users from any or all connected networks;

agencies can preconfigure those talkgroups in accordance with emergency plans and activate them when needed

Can dynamically configure the groups, as necessary, to support joint operations in fast-changing circumstances

In addition to the State of Delaware, Wicomico County has written and unwritten agreements for mutual-aid responses requiring interoperability with neighboring counties, law enforcement, fire departments, EMS, emergency management, and MSP including:

City of Salisbury Dorchester County Somerset County Worcester County MIEMSS Ocean City Sussex County Delaware Salisbury University Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Department of Natural Resources




>> Page 65 <<

Maryland Emergency Management Talbot County

3.4.8 TOWER ANALYSIS

Concepts To Operations has separated out, in Section IV of this report, an analysis of each of the towers. Option 3 would require:

New Naylor Mill tower (see Section 4.2.2 for details) New Pittsville tower (see Section 4.2.3 for details) New Poplar Hill tower (see Section 4.2.4 for details) New tower at Mardela Springs (see Section 4.2.10 for details) Upgrade of Fruitland tower (see Section 4.2.2 for details) New tower at Bennett School Complex (see Section 4.2.9 for details)

3.4.9 COST ANALYSIS

Concepts To Operations has provided, in Section V, a comprehensive cost analysis of each of the options, including:

Infrastructure NG9-1-1 CPE Mobiles and portables Cost of installation System maintenance costs




>> Page 66 <<

SECTION IV TOWER ANALYSIS Telecommunications towers are the key component to getting the first responder radio signal to and from the dispatch center. Each tower location is calculated and is positioned to ensure that the signal (talk-out and talk-back) is maintained at a DAQ of 3.4 or better with a voice strength of -95 dBm (IFC Section 510 in Section 3.3.2). In the development of a design, CTO considers: (1) existing tower infrastructure; (2) existing non-county owned towers (e.g. state towers); (3) existing commercial towers; and (4) the need to build a new tower in a new location. In the development of a new system, coverage from each location is evaluated independently to determine what coverage may be provided from each of the location to various portions of the county. 4.1 ANSI/TIA 222 REV. G (SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY)

After 10 years, under Rev. F, the ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G standard was adopted for structural sustainability. While issued in 2006, each individual jurisdiction (local or state) is required to adopt the revision (thought the adoption of the building code. For public safety entities, the adoption of Rev. G had a watershed impact on critical infrastructure across the county. Critical infrastructure is defined as:

“Structures specifically designed for essential communications or structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life or property if there was a failure of the structure (emphasis added)”

For tower loading (i.e., wind impact on the tower and antennas) and the possibility of structural failure, the change was significant. Rev. F standard was to measure a single gust of wind (average against the highest peak wind gust), without other considerations. The adoption of Rev. G added five (5) significant analyses for structural assessment of towers. The new factors are:

A 3-second sustained gust of wind Whether the topography was flat or in an area which pushed additional wind load up

or down the topography against the base of the tower The hydrology of the soils on which the tower foundation rested Grounding of the structure for storm purposes to ensure that 10 ohm resistance to

earth is met Changes to the charts and wind speeds zones

The chart below (Figure IV-1) provides a graphic example of the new wind speed standards, Rev. G. The old wind speed of 85 mph, which was the Rev. F wind load design speed for the Wicomico County area, would now require a tower to have to be designed to 104 mph to meet critical infrastructure standards under Rev. F. To meet the current wind load design speed for Wicomico County, which is 120 mph under Rev. G, an existing tower would need to have been designed to 140 mph. While structural analysis was not done on state infrastructure as part of this report, CTO notes that only the Fruitland tower was constructed after the issuance of Rev. G. CTO would also note that the State of Maryland has only recently adopted Rev. G as the design standard.

Corpor

Figure IV-

The Natiothe Easte16.2 yea Sustainaoptions a

rate Offices: 801

1 Rev. G 3-Sec

onal Oceaniern Shore ars.

bility of infrand recomm

Evaluat

Compass Way,

cond Basic W

ic and Atmosare likely to

astructure isended a des

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

Wind Speed Ma

spheric Admbe directly h

s one of thesigned for th


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 67 <<

ap

ministration (hit by a Cat

e six (6) kehe new radio


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

(NOAH) showtegory 2 or

ey issues aro system.


24-8911 – cto@c

w that Wicoabove hurri

round which


concepts2ops.co

mico Countycane once e

h CTO evalu

ounty tem(s)

om

y and every

uated

Corpor

4.2 TOW

As part oand towebe used was eval

The rema Figure IV-2

In this anvarious oprovided

rate Offices: 801

WER BREA

of this reporters that wouby the hybriuated for:

Coverage Redundan Ownershi

aining portio

2 Towers

nalysis, CTOoptions detain this secti

Evaluat

Compass Way,

AKDOWN

t, CTO revield be used bd system. W

e ncy ip

on of this rep

O reviewed ailed in thison and are k

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

wed and evby a standa

While some to

port examine

nine (9) seps report. Dekeyed to the


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 68 <<

aluated towelone 800 MHowers are u

es each towe

parate toweetails and ine map above


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ers used by Hz system, sed in one d

er.

rs and locatnformation

e (Figure IV-2


24-8911 – cto@c

y the Marylanas well as todesign and n

tion for the on each of2).


concepts2ops.co

nd FiRST syowers that wnot another,

impact or uf the towers

ounty tem(s)

om

ystem would each

use in s are

Corpor

Figure IV-density)

4.2.1 TO

The Vien21869 (3tower pro Impact o Option 1augmenttower. Ccosts to u Impact o Option 2 and altercannot din the futthe Mary Impact o Option 3 would bedesign. Cnear Mar Impact o Option 4There woMarylandControl Bcurrently

rate Offices: 801

-3 Vienna SH

WER A – V

nna SHA tow38°29’56”N, ovides Mary

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or alteTO cannot users in the

of Option 2

outlined in tration of theetermine whture. This to

yland One sy

of Option 3

outlined in e no currentCoverage to rdela Spring

of Option 4

outlined in ould be no cd FiRST sysBoard will aserved by b

Evaluat

Compass Way,

A 700 MHz (

IENNA STA

wer is locate75°50’52”Wland FiRST

– No chang

in this repoeration of thdetermine wfuture.

– No chang

this report ise towers. Thehether the Cower is curreystem.

– No chang

this report ist cost to theSharptown s.

– No chang

this report icurrent costtem would c

assess any tboth MEIMS

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

in-building hi

ATE HIGHWA

ed at N. sideW). The towe

coverage of

ge or impact

ort is the ue tower. Th

whether the

ge or impact

s the utilizatiere would b

Control Boardently served

ge or impact

s the constre county forand Mardela

ge or impact

is the constrt to the councontinue to utower infrasS microwave


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 69 <<

igh-

AY ADMINIS

e US 50, 1.2er is registerf Sharptown

t

utilization ofere would bControl Boa

t

on of the Mabe no currend will assessby both ME

t

uction of a sr this tower,a Springs wo

t

ruction of a nty for this tutilize this towstructure cose and fiber b


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

STRATION

24 mi W of red with the and Mardel

f the Marylbe no currenard will ass

aryland FiRSnt cost to thes any tower

EIMSS micro

standalone 8as this tow

ould be prov

hybrid 700/tower. Thoswer. CTO casts to usersbackhaul on


24-8911 – cto@c

US 50 & RtFCC ASR aa Springs.

land FiRSTnt cost to thess any tow

ST towers we county forinfrastructu

owave and f

800 MHz P2wer would novided by a n

/800 MHz Pe channels annot determ

s in the fututhe Marylan


concepts2ops.co

t 33, Viennaas 1204969

T towers wihe county fower infrastru

with augmentr this tower. re costs to u

fiber backha

25 system. Tot be part oew tower loc

25 radio sysoperating o

mine whethere. This townd One syste

ounty tem(s)

om

a, MD . The

ithout or this ucture

tation CTO

users aul on

There of the cated

stem. n the er the wer is em.

Corpor

There wothe desiglocated n Figure IV-density)

4.2.2 TO

The Nay75°34’58ASR as does not Impact o Option 1augmentThe Marthe areanecessitacontinuedrequire asafety cothe struc Impact o Option 2 would ins(one of tState Pophasing oMarylandnotes thaMill towefor other were mo

rate Offices: 801

ould be no cgn. Coveragnear Mardela

-4 Naylor Mil

WER B – N

ylor Mill tow8”W) and se

1044416. Tmeet curren

of Option 1–

1 outlined itation or alteryland State a serviced bate the repld use of on

a reconstrucommunicatiotural engine

of Option 2

outlined in tsert this sitethe recomm

olice tower loof signals ind State Poliat the selecters. The stru

communicaoved to the M

Evaluat

Compass Way,

current cost ge to Sharpta Springs.

ll 700 MHz (i

AYLOR MIL

wer is locaterves as the

The tower isnt Rev. G sta

– Naylor Mil

in this repoeration of the

Police toweby this toweacement of

ne or both oction of this tons then its ering and an

– Naylor Mi

this report ise into the sysmendations).

ocated on R the 700 MHce tower loction of Optioctural report

ations needsMSP propert

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

to the countown and M

in-building hi

LL

ed at 411 Ncounty prim one of twoandards (se

ll tower rep

ort is the ue tower. Marer located oer. CTO not

the Naylor of the Naylotower. CTO reclassificatnalysis that w

ill tower rep

s the utilizatistem, as it wCTO notes

Route 13, simHz system. Acated on Ro

on 2 would tt and the co

s will require ty. CTO also


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 70 <<

nty for this toMardela Sprin

igh-

Figure density)

Naylor Mill Rme site toweo guyed towe Section 4.

lacement

utilization ofryland FiRSTon Route 13 tes the seleMill tower.

or Mill towenotes that

ion from a Cwas perform

placement

on of the Mawould be thes that, due tmulcast andAn alternativoute 13, thutrigger or neontinued use

a reconstruo notes that


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

ower, as thisngs would b

IV-5 Naylor M)

Rd, Salisbuer. The towewers located .1).

f the MarylT does not u provides siection of OHowever, trs for other if the tower

Class III to amed.

aryland FiRSe location of to the towerd other techve would be us alleviatinecessitate the of one or buction of thist if the tower


24-8911 – cto@c

s tower woube provided

Mill 800 MHz

ury, MD 218er is register

on the pro

land FiRSTutilize this toimilar on-strption 1 doe

the structurar communica

is not beinga Class II str

ST towers wthe prime s

rs proximity nical issuesto move the

ng the simulhe replacemeboth of the Ns tower, evenr is not bein


concepts2ops.co

uld not be pby a new t

z (in-building

801 (38°24’3red with the perty. The t

T towers wiwer in its de

reet coverages not triggal report andations needg used for pructure may

with augmentite for the coto the Mary

s may arise e prime site tlcast issue.ent of the N

Naylor Mill ton if the primeg used for p

ounty tem(s)

om

art of tower

high-

35”N, FCC

tower

ithout esign. ge for er or d the s will public y alter

tation ounty yland as to to the CTO

Naylor owers e site public




>> Page 71 <<

safety communications then its reclassification from a Class III to a Class II structure may alter the structural engineering and analysis that was performed. Impact of Option 3 and Option 4 – Naylor Mill tower replacement (380’) Options 3 and 4 outlined in this report are for the creation of a standalone 800 MHz system or a hybrid 700/800 MHz system with the location of the prime site for the county (one of the recommendations) at Naylor Mill Road. CTO notes due to the towers proximity to the Maryland State Police, Concepts To Operations’ assessment included a document review of a report provided to the county by another consultant on the status of the existing tower at 411 Naylor Mill Road. While not an immediate safety hazard, the results of the report indicate that certain sections of the two (2) guyed towers show structural overload of 180% to 240%, which would not be sustainable in a major weather event (wind speed of 120 mph). The result of this tower failure would likely be the loss of communications from the tower and to the corresponding existing two towers (loss of microwave backhaul. In 2006, ANSI/TIA recommended a significant review of all critical structures across the United States with the revisions of wind charts, revisions to soil hydrology analysis and requiring topographic features around the towers be taken into account. CTO’s review of the antennas on each of the two towers shows that careful placement and a determination of whether the antenna are really necessary would allow the county to replace the two towers with a single 380’ tower (subject to soil evaluation). Concepts To Operations also evaluated whether it would be prudent to construct a multiuse building (3,000 sq. feet) which would house the prime site equipment and a small radio shop, which would also meet the sustainability (Rev. G) for Class III critical infrastructure. Currently, the primary PSAP is located at 411 Naylor Mill Road. CTO found no data available as to the rating for which the current county facility was designed and constructed. The center serves as the prime tower site and emergency services communications. While outside the scope of this report, a review of the PSAP, its location, and the sustainability of the building, should be completed to determine whether there is a more appropriate location for the facility. It should be noted that the communications center should be staffed on a 24/7/365 basis to ensure the critical communications operations are maintained at all times. The backup center (the Sheriff’s Department) is located in the same complex as the Emergency Services Communications PSAP. Concepts To Operations has reviewed the current “users” of the two towers and believes that the county can discontinue some non-county users on the tower, move some users to other county facilities, and change the heights of other users, allowing for the reconstruction of a single communications tower at Naylor Mill Road rather than the replacement of both towers. The estimated cost of the new tower, relocation of users, and the construction of a new compound is $500,000. Cost of Land Acquisition One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce

Corpor

overall syproperty Figure IVdensity)

4.2.3 TO

The Pitts(38°21’27field revinegativetower site Impact o Option 1augmenttower. Ththis towewill asses Impact oRoute 50 Option 2 and alterpaging sywill needwater. Inthe Rev. completeconstructthe site tower is clocated ais $85,00

rate Offices: 801

ystem costsacquisition c

V-6 Pittsville

WER C AND

sville tower 7”N, 75°25’5ew, it was nly impact the.

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or altehe county cuer. The towess any towe

of Option 20 (approxim

outlined in tration of theystem utilizin

d to be revieaddition, it G standard

ely replacedtion of a newand determcurrently seralong Route 00 and would

Evaluat

Compass Way,

. For the purcosts.

700 MHz (i

D TOWER C

is located a53”W). The noted that the foundation

– No chang

in this repoeration of thurrently operr is a state or infrastructu

2 – upgrademately 3 mile

this report ise towers. Thng this towe

ewed againsis likely that s for this ar

d. Structuraw tower (Toined there irved by MEI50 (approxi

d be borne b

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

rposes of To

n-building hi

C1 – PITTSV

at Sixty Footower is reg

he area arouns of the ex

ge or impact

ort is the ue tower. Thrates its 800owned towerure costs to

e of tower,es)

s the utilizatihe county cur. The tower

st TIA 222 Rthe tower wea adding al upgrades

ower C1) a ps room on MSS microwimately 3 mby the county


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 72 <<

ower B1 – N

igh-

Figure density)

VILLE (290’)

t Rd .25 migistered withund the towxisting tower

t

utilization ofere would b

0 MHz analor. CTO cannusers in the

, connectio

on of the Maurrent operar is a state to

Rev. G standwould have eadditional co

can be frprobability fothe property

wave with noiles from they in addition


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

aylor Mill, th

IV-7 Pittsvill)

)

i S of Rolmh the FCC A

wer often floor and placem

f the Marylbe no currenog system annot determine future.

on of tower

aryland FiRSates its 800 ower. It is likdards and foeither to be sosts to the corom $15,000or option 3 ay for constro fiber backhe tower). Thn to any struc


24-8911 – cto@c

he county wo

le 800 MHz

m Road, PittsASR as 1038ods. This floment of a ne

land FiRSTnt cost to thnd its paging

ne whether th

r to fiber o

ST towers wMHz analog

kely that the or impacts frstructurally uontinued use0 to $350,0and option 4ruction of a haul. The cloe cost of upctural upgrad


concepts2ops.co

ould have no

(in-building

sville, MD 28582. Duringooding is likeew shelter a

T towers wihe county fog system utihe Control B

optic loop a

with augmentg system antower foundrom the stanupgraded to e of this tow000 making4. CTO revienew tower.

osest fiber lopgrading thedes.

ounty tem(s)

om

o real

high-

21850 g our ely to at the

ithout or this ilizing Board

along

tation nd its dation nding meet

wer or g the ewed This

oop is e fiber

Corpor

Impact ooptic loo Option 3 hybrid 70its pagingthe staterequired.shelter. Ca new tosite. Theclosest fiupgradinupgrades Cost of L One of this the cobelieves that is oEducatiooverall sythe Statapproxim Figure IVdensity)

4.2.4 TO

The Pop75°46’52compounrelease f

rate Offices: 801

of Option 3op along Ro

and 4 outlin00/800 MHzg system ut

e. The constr. The new toCTO revieweower (carefue state toweiber loop is lg the fiber is.

Land Acqui

he significanst of propertthat leverag

owned by thon, and/or Wystem costste of Maryl

mately $175,0

-8 Poplar Hi

WER D AND

plar Hill towe2”W). The tond are locatefacility.

Evaluat

Compass Way,

3 and 4 – Coute 50 (app

ned in this r P25 systemilizing this toruction of a ower would ed the site al location of

er is currentlocated alonis $85,000 a

isition

nt expendituty acquisitioging county he State of

Wicomico Cou. For the puand Proper000 for a 1-3

ll 700 MHz (

D TOWER D

er is locateower is reged within the

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

Constructioproximately

eport is the m. The counower. The tonew tower (have an es

and determinf the tower vly served by

ng Route 50 and would b

res that the on for placem

owned propMaryland (

unty Departmrposes of Torty, the cou3 acre parce

(in-building l

D1 – POPLA

d at 24090 gistered withe confines of


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 73 <<

on of a newy 3 miles)

creation of ty current oower is a sta(Tower C1) stimated cosned there is vis a vis wety MEIMSS (approxima

be borne by

county woument of a towperty, such a(SHA, DNR,ment of Recower C1 – Punty would el for the pla

ow-

Figure density)

AR HILL (25

Nanticokeh the FCC f the Maryla


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

w tower, co

a standalonperates its 8ate tower loas part of Ost of $300,0room on the

tlands and dmicrowave

ately 3 miles the county

uld face in imwer to be usas the public, or MSP), creation, ParPittsville, if th

have a pcement of th

IV-9 Poplar )

50’)

Rd, QuantiASR as 1

nd Eastern


24-8911 – cto@c

onnection o

ne 800 MHz 800 MHz an

ocated on prOption 3 and000 includinge property fodrainage arewith no fibefrom the towin addition

mplementatised in the nc safety comWicomico C

rks & Tourishe county weproperty acqhe new towe

Hill 800 MHz

co, MD 218038583. ThCorrectiona


concepts2ops.co

of tower to

P25 systemnalog systemroperty owned Option 4 wg new toweror constructie an issue aer backhaul.wer). The coto any struc

on of this prew system.

mplex or proCounty Boasm, would reere unable toquisition coer and shelte

z (in-building

856 (38°21’4he tower anl Institution’s

ounty tem(s)

om

fiber

m or a m and ed by

will be r and ion of

at this . The ost of ctural

roject CTO

operty ard of educe o use

ost of er

g low-

42”N, nd its s pre-




>> Page 74 <<

Impact of Option 1 – No change or impact Option 1 outlined in this report is the utilization of the Maryland FiRST towers without augmentation or alteration of the tower. There would be no current cost to the county for this tower. The county current operates its 800 MHz analog system and its paging system utilizing this tower. The tower is a state tower. CTO cannot determine whether the Control Board will assess any tower infrastructure costs to users in the future. Impact of Option 2 – Upgrade of State tower, connection of tower to fiber optic loop along Route 50 (approximately 14 miles) Option 2 outlined in this report is the utilization of the Maryland FiRST towers with augmentation and alteration of the towers. The county current operates its 800 MHz analog system and its paging system utilizing this tower. The tower is a state tower. It is likely that the tower would have either to be structurally upgraded to meet the Rev. G standards for this area (adding additional costs to the continued use of this tower) or completely replaced. Structural upgrades can be from $15,000 to $350,000. This tower is currently served by MEIMSS microwave with no fiber backhaul. The closest fiber loop is located along Route 50 (approximately 14 miles from the tower). The cost of upgrading the fiber is $425,000 and would be borne by the county in addition to any structural upgrades. Impact of Option 3 and 4 – Construction of a new tower, connection of tower to fiber optic loop along Route 50 (approximately 14 miles) Option 3 and 4 outlined in this report is the creation of a standalone 800 MHz P25 system or a hybrid 700/800 MHz P25 system. The county current operates its 800 MHz analog system and its paging system utilizing this tower. The tower is a state tower located on property owned by the state. The construction of a new tower (Tower C1) as part of Option 3 and Option 4 will be required. The new tower would have an estimated cost of $300,000 including new tower and shelter. CTO reviewed the site and determined there is room on the property for construction of a new tower. The state tower is currently served by MEIMSS microwave with no fiber backhaul. The closest fiber loop is located along Route 50 (approximately 14 miles from the tower). The cost of upgrading the fiber is $425,000 and would be borne by the county in addition to any structural upgrades. Cost of Land Acquisition One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce overall system costs. For the purposes of Tower D1 – Poplar Hill, if the county were unable to use the State of Maryland Property, the county would have a property acquisition cost of approximately $175,000 for a 1-3 acre parcel for the placement of the new tower and shelter.

Corpor

Figure IVhigh-dens

4.2.5 TO

The Salis75°33’44are locat Impact o Option 1augmenttower. Thany towe Impact o Option 2likely thathis areafrom $15cannot din the futrun alongMSP pro Impact o Option 3Salisburytower haon its neMill towewere use

rate Offices: 801

-10 Salisburysity)

WER E AND

sbury MSP t4”W). The towed at the Ma

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or altehe tower is aer infrastruct

of Option 2

outlined in at the tower , adding add

5,000 to $35etermine whture. The towg Route 13.perty.

of Option 3

3 outlined iny MSP is a s the MEIMw P25 800

er (1.3 milesed for other c

Evaluat

Compass Way,

y MSP 700 M

D TOWER E

tower is locawer is registaryland State

Impact of O

in this repoeration of tha state toweure costs to

– Structura

this report iwould have

ditional costs50,000 makinhether the Cwer is servic There is a

– Non-use o

n this reportstate towerSS microwaMHz radio ss) which wocommunicat

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

MHz (in-build

E1 – SALISB

ated at MSPtered with the Police Bar

Option 1 – N

ort is the ue tower. Thr. CTO cannusers in the

al upgrade o

s the utilizate to be strucs to the conng the repla

Control Boardced by both possibility o

of the towe

t is the crear and is utiliave backhausystem. Theould like restions in the 8


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 75 <<

ding

BURY MARY

P Bk E 13.5 mhe FCC ASRrracks E.

No change o


not determine future.

of tower

tion of the Mcturally upgrtinued use o

acement of td will assessMEIMSS m

of relocation

r

ation of a szed in the 7

ul, which wouSalisbury M

ult in signifi800 MHz sys


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

YLAND STA

mi N, SalisbR as 103090

or impact

f the Marylbe no currenne whether t

Maryland FiRraded to meof this towerthe tower (Ts any tower

microwave an of the radio

stand-alone 700 MHz Muld be utilize

MSP tower isicant simulcstem.


24-8911 – cto@c

ATE POLICE

bury, MD 21800. The towe

land FiRSTnt cost to ththe Control B

RST towers eet the Rev.r. Structural Tower E1) a

infrastructund fiber optio shop and

800 MHz PMaryland FiRed by Wicoms located clo

cast interfere


concepts2ops.co

E

804 (38°25’er and comp

T towers wihe county foBoard will as

augmented G standardupgrades caprobability. re costs to uc cable, whprime site t

P25 system.RST system.mico for bacose to the Nence if the t

ounty tem(s)

om

15”N, pound

ithout or this ssess

d. It is ds for an be CTO

users ich is to the

. The

. The khaul

Naylor tower

Corpor

Impact o Option 4Salisburythe Marysystem. MSP towservice w Figure IVhigh-dens

4.2.6 TO

The Sali75°36’39 Impact o Option 1augmenttower. Ccosts to u Impact o Option 2 and altercannot din the futthe Mary Should Weither up

rate Offices: 801

of Option 4

4 outlined iny MSP toweyland FiRST The 800 MH

wer for Optiowould be pro

V-11 Salisburysity)

WER F AND

sbury SHA 9”W). The tow

of Option 1


of Option 2

outlined in tration of theetermine whture. This to

yland One sy

Wicomico Cpgrade or rep

Evaluat

Compass Way,

– Maryland

n this reporter is a state

system andHz channelson 4 does novided by the

y SHA 700 M

D TOWER F

tower is lower is regist

– No chang


– No chang

this report ise towers. Thehether the Cower is curreystem.

ounty determplacement w

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

FiRST 700

t is the creowned towe

d would provs would not not impact ce Naylor Mill

MHz (in-build

F1 – SALISB

ocated at 66tered with th

ge or impact


whether the

ge or impact

s the utilizatiere would b

Control Boardently served

mine that thwould be requ


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 76 <<

MHz chann

ation of a her that provivide backhabe located

coverage fro tower.

ding

BURY STAT

60 West Roe FCC ASR

t


t, unless st

on of the Mabe no currend will assessby both ME

he existing tuired and th


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

nels only on

hybrid 700/8ides backhaul for Optionon the towe

om the 800

TE HIGHWA

oad, SalisbuR as 1255454


trengthened

aryland FiRSnt cost to thes any tower

EIMSS micro

tower does e costs wou


24-8911 – cto@c

n tower

800 MHz Paul (microwan 4, the 700er. The non-MHz system

AY ADMINIS

ury, MD 2184.


d

ST towers we county forinfrastructu

owave and f

not meet Ruld be borne


concepts2ops.co

P25 System.ave and fibe0/800 MHz h-use of Salism as the ar

STRATION

801 (38°22’3


with augmentr this tower. re costs to u

fiber backha

Rev. G standby the coun

ounty tem(s)

om

. The er) for hybrid sbury ea of

33”N,


tation CTO

users aul on

dards nty.

Corpor

Impact o Option 3 would bedesign. Impact o Option 4There woMarylandMHz desmicrowavControl B Figure IVdensity)

4.2.7 TO

The Fru75°37’56 Impact o Option 1augmenttower. Ccosts to u Impact oupgrade Option 2augmentbackhauhave dire“single p

rate Offices: 801

of Option 3

outlined in e no current

of Option 4

outlined in ould be no cd FiRST systsign, except ve and fiber Board will as

-12 Fruitland

WER G AN

itland towe6”W). The tow

of Option 1


of Option e of state tow

2, as descrted. One of tl. At the curect microwapoints of fa

Evaluat

Compass Way,

-No change

this report ist cost to the

– No chang

this report icurrent costtem would cfor microwabackhaul on

ssess any tow

700 MHz (i

D TOWER G

r is locatedwer is regist

– No chang


2, Option 3wer

ibed in thisthe key elemrrent time, thave linkage ailure” for th

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

e or impact

s the constre county for

ge or impact

is the constrt to the councontinue to uave backhan the Marylawer infrastru

in-building hi

G1 – FRUIT

d at 4085 tered with th

ge or impact


whether the

3, and Opt

s report, is ments in the his newer tointo the MEhe backhau


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 77 <<

uction of a sthis tower,

t

ruction of a nty for this tutilize this towul. This tow

and One sysucture costs

igh-

Figure density)

LAND (250’

Disharoon e FCC ASR

t


tion 4 – Im

the developaugmentati

ower is only IMSS syste

ul of commu


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

standalone 8as this towe

hybrid 700/tower. Thoswer, but this

wer is currentem. CTO cato users in t

IV-13 Fruitla)

’)

Road, EdeR as 1273228


mpact of in

pment of thion of the Mserved by a

em. This towunications t


24-8911 – cto@c

800 MHz P2er would no

/800 MHz Pe channels

s tower is nontly served bannot determthe future.

nd 800 MHz

n, MD 2188.


nfrastructur

he Marylandaryland FiR

a fiber netwower becomesto the syste


concepts2ops.co

25 system. Tot be used i

25 radio sysoperating o

ot used in theby both MEImine whethe

(in-building

822 (38°18’2


re upgrade

d FiRST syST system iork and does one of theem. Should

ounty tem(s)

om

There n the

stem. n the e 800 IMSS er the

high-

20”N,


and

ystem is the

es not e key d any




>> Page 78 <<

contractor or accident sever the fiber optic cable, all communications would be terminated from the Fruitland area until either the fiber is repaired (24-48 hours) or an alternative (mobile to mobile to mobile to tower) is created. In an emergency situation, this single point of failure is unacceptable. As shown in Figure III-6 earlier in this report, there is no microwave pathway near this area. Wicomico County, working with MEISS, will be required to: (1) do a microwave link analysis; (2) determine donor and receiver site for the signal; (3) add a second microwave dish at the donor site to accept the signal; (4) upgrade the microwave equipment at Fruitland, Milestone, Salisbury SHA, and Poplar Hill; (5) get the FCC to issue a new link and frequency to MEIMSS; and (6) integrate the ten new microwave dishes into the system. A review of the tower indicates that there are few antennas currently on the tower allowing for the addition of antennas by the county. Should the structural analysis indicate that the tower needs to be strengthened, there would be little disruption to the tower. CTO notes that there is not much additional space for a second tower to be located on the property. Concepts To Operations has also determined that, due to limited space on this site, the construction of a new tower is not feasible. It is likely that either the tower, which was built in 2007, can be upgraded to meet the new Rev. G standards or the county would accept that this tower would remain at its current rating. At the time of final design, a structural assessment of the tower will determine the final costs and direction concerning the Fruitland tower. Cost of Land Acquisition One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce overall system costs. For the purposes of Tower G1 – Fruitland, the county would have a property acquisition cost of approximately $350,000 for a 1-3 acre parcel for the placement of the new tower and shelter.

Corpor

Figure IV-density)

4.2.8 TO

The John75°29’50 Impact o Option 1augmenttower. CTusers in t Impact o Option 2MarylandSomersesystem. Somerse Impact o In its deupon thedensity) c

rate Offices: 801

14 Johnson D

WER H AND

nson DNR t0”W). The tow

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or alteTO cannot dthe future

of Option 2

does not ud FiRST haet County an

The tower et County.

of Option 3

sign, Concee coverage pcould be cov

Evaluat

Compass Way,

DNR 700 MHz (

D TOWER H

tower is locawer is regist

– No chang

in this repoeration of thdetermine w

– No chang

se the Mouas used thed to act as aprovides n

and Option

epts To Opeprovided by vered withou

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

(in-building hi

H1 – JOHNS

ated at 3214tered with th

ge or impact


whether the C

ge or impact

nt Olive towe Mt Olive ta microwaveno coverage

4 – No cha

erations did Pittsville an

ut the utilizat


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 79 <<

igh-

SON DEPAR

44 Mt Olive e FCC ASR

t

utilization ofere would bControl Boar

t

wer in the detower to proe link to the re to Wicom

ange or imp

not utilize d by the towtion of this to


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

RTMENT OF

Rd, SalisbuR as 1254409

f the Marylbe no currenrd will asses

esign for covovide signifremaining poico County,

pact

Tower H. Cwer in Fruitlaower.


24-8911 – cto@c

F NATURAL

ury, MD 2189.

land FiRSTnt cost to thess any tower

verage in Wficant on-strortion of the, but is use

CTO determand, all of th


concepts2ops.co

L RESOURC

804 (38°18’

T towers wie County for infrastructu

Wicomico Coreet coverag Maryland Fed for cove

mined that, bhe buildings

ounty tem(s)

om

CES

13”N,

ithout or this ure to

ounty. ge to

FiRST erage

based (low-

Corpor

Figure IV-density)

4.2.9 TO

The Mile75°35’44MilestoneSchool Cbe servicverified tspace wmicrowavto Rev. sufficientby the cothe unive Impact o Option 1augmenttower, as Impact o Option 2 constructbackhaupenetrateSalisburycreate sopanel aninterferenor better FiRST dincreased

rate Offices: 801

-15 Milestone

WER J OR

estone towe4”W). The toe communic

Complex. Thced by Verhat at the tim

would need ve links to thG standardt space at thounty. The sersity, and to

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or altes it is not par

of Option 2

outlined in tion of a newl. A new toes all of they. CTO noteome interfertennas propnce. CTO dofor in-buildin

design CTO d unreliabilit

Evaluat

Compass Way,

e 700 MHz (i

TOWER J1

er is locateower is regiscations receihe private towizon fiber ome of this reto be rentehe MEIMSSds but was he site to alite is pivotal

o Peninsula R

– No chang

in this repoeration of thrt of the Mar

– Use of the

this report isw tower in Sower at thise primary ines that the trence issue

perly positionoes not belieng coverage

believes thty.

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

in-building hi

– MILESTO

d at 300 Estered with tived approvawer will hav

optics when eport the 165ed from Mile, at an estimnot built aslow for the c in providingRegional Me

ge or impact


ryland FiRST

e tower in M

s the utilizatSalisbury, res location in-building (mtower locatios with the s

ned toward teve that thee without thishat the DA


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 80 <<

igh-

Figure density)

ONE (165’)/B

E College Ahe FCC ASal and built

ve two (2) wiVerizon ins

5’ elevation westone for 3mated rate os a Class Iconstructiong in-building edical Cente

t


T System.

Maryland Fi

tion of the Meconstructions necessarymedium andon of 3.3 msimulcast. Hhe nigh den

e Maryland Fs site. Shou

AQ for in-bu


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

IV-16 Milesto)

BENNETT S

Av, SalisburR as 12915a 185’ cell tireless carriestalls on thwas availab3 antennas,of $3,500 perII critical in

n of another coverage in

er.

f the Marylbe no curren

RST system

Maryland FiRn of the primy to ensured high-densiles from To

However, CTsity building

FiRST systeld this site n

uilding would


24-8911 – cto@c

one 800 MHz

SCHOOL (20

ry, MD 218547. During ttower locateers at 185’ ae cell towele for use by GPS, shelr month. Thefrastructure tower owne

nside the Cit

land FiRSTnt cost to th

m

RST tower ame site and e that the sity buildingsower F idenTO believess will decream can provi

not be addedd decrease


concepts2ops.co

z (in-building

00)’

804 (38°20’4the study pe

ed at the Beand 175’ anr. Milestoney the countylter, and twe tower wastower. The

ed and contrty of Salisbu

T towers wihe county fo

ugmented bimprovemen700 MHz ss) in the Ctified above

s that the uase the simuide a DAQ od to the Mary below 3.0

ounty tem(s)

om

high-

42”N, eriod, ennett nd will e has y. The wo (2) s built ere is rolled

ury, to

ithout or this

by the nts to signal ity of

e may se of ulcast of 3.4 yland

with




>> Page 81 <<

Impact of Option 3 and Option 4 – Construction of a New Tower (200’) Option 3 and Option 4 require the placement of a new tower on or near the Bennett School Complex. The school complex is sited between the high-density concentrations of buildings south of Route 50. Without the construction of a tower (200’) within the city, neither the 700/800 MHz system will provide the county with the in-building comprehensive coverage that is necessary and recommended to meet the county’s objectives of the RFP and the new radio system requirements. The existing 185’ commercial tower was at the Bennett School Complex by Milestone for the use of Verizon and AT&T, who have leased the top 20 feet of the tower from Milestone. The next available height for public safety antennas is 165’, which is available to the time of this report. As part of the construction, Verizon as the local a carrier will be providing fiber optics to the tower. The construction of the new tower would cost approximately $300,000 including the cost of a new shelter and other infrastructure improvements. The construction of a public safety tower on the premises is an option for Wicomico County. There is sufficient space. With the board of education being 31% of the use of the communication system and the need for the new radio system to provide in-building communications at all school facilities, the location of the tower should not have the annual rental costs nor the land acquisition cost that other locations in that immediate area would pose. Cost of Land Acquisition One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce overall system costs. For the purposes of Tower J1 – Milestone, if the county were unable to use the board of education property, the county would have a property acquisition cost of approximately $500,000 for a 1-3 acre parcel for the placement of the new tower and shelter, if a parcel could be found.

Corpor

4.2.10 TO

The Mar(38°28’1tower iscommuntowers bacross th Impact o Option 1augmenttower asControl B Impact o Option 2augmenttower asControl B Impact ooptic loo Option 3 hybrid 70coverageconfigureadding anew towecompounproperty and has

rate Offices: 801

OWER K OR

rdela Spring1”N, 75°44’5s current nications. Thack to the d

he state.

of Option 1

1 outlined itation or altes it is not pBoard will as

of Option 2

2 outlined itation or altes it is not pBoard will as

of Option 3op along Ro

and 4 outlin00/800 MHz e, it does ued would hadditional coser would cosnd. CTO revfor construcaccess to fi

Evaluat

Compass Way,

R TOWER K

gs tower is 52”W). The tnot used ine sole purpo

dispatch and

– No chang

in this repoeration of thpart of the Mssess any tow

– No chang

in this repoeration of thpart of the Mssess any tow

3 and 4 – Coute 50

ned in this rP25 system

use the towave to be strsts for the ust an estimaviewed the ction of a neber backhau

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>>

K1 – MARDE

located at 9tower is regin the Maryose of the to back to the

ge or impact

ort is the ue tower. ThMaryland Fiwer infrastru

ge or impact

ort is the ue tower. ThMaryland Fiwer infrastru

Constructio

eport is the m. While the wer for backructurally upuse of this toated $250,00site and de

ew tower. Thul, but is cu


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 82 <<

Figure high-de

ELA SPRING

9975 Sharpstered with yland FiRSower is the fe prime site,

t

utilization ofere would bRST System

ucture costs

t

utilization ofere would biRST systemucture costs

on of a new

creation of Maryland F

khaul. It is pgraded to mower or requ00 for the ne

etermined thhis tower is crrently not c


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

IV-17 Mardelansity)

GS (200’)

ptown Rd, Mthe FCC AS

ST radio sformation ofin Easton, a

f the Marylbe no currenm. CTO canto users in t

f the Marylbe no currenm. CTO canto users in t

w tower, co

a standaloniRST systemlikely that t

meet the Reuiring a new ew tower anere is roomcurrently se

connect to th


24-8911 – cto@c

a Springs 80

Mardela SprSR as 12662ystem for f the backhaas part of th

land FiRSTnt cost to thnnot determthe future.

land FiRSTnt cost to thnnot determthe future.

onnection o

ne 800 MHz m does not uthe tower a

ev. G standatower. The

nd corresponm on the bo

rved by MEhe fiber loop


concepts2ops.co

0 MHz (in-bu

rings, MD 2257. The Ma

transmissioaul from all ohe unified sy

T towers wihe county fomine whethe

T towers wihe county fomine whethe

of tower to

P25 systemuse this towas it currenards for this construction

nding shelteard of educIMSS micro

p in Route 5

ounty tem(s)

om

uilding

21837 ardela on of of the ystem

ithout or this er the

ithout or this er the

fiber

m or a er for

ntly is area

n of a r and

cation wave

50.. In




>> Page 83 <<

both Option 3 and Option 4, the use of this tower replaces Tower A and Tower A1 (Vienna SHA) which is located outside of the county. The tower would serve to cover the Sharptown and Mardela Springs areas for in-building first responder coverage Cost of Land Acquisition One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce overall system costs. For the purposes of Tower K1 – Mardela Springs, if the county were unable to use the board of education property, the county would have a property acquisition cost of approximately $175,000 for a 1-3 acre parcel for the placement of the new tower and shelter. 4.3 TOWER CONCLUSION

As shown below, the construction or upgrade of tower infrastructure is a significant project cost for three (3) of the four (4) options. The upgrade to sustainability (120 mph) is a critical necessity of this project and should not be deleted from the overall project. Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost System Infrastructure

Fiber Loop 0 $0 17 $340,000 17 $340,000 17 $340,000Microwave 0 $0 5 $100,000 10 $200,000 10 $200,000 Tower

Construction New Tower 0 $0 2 $800,000 5 $1,650,000 5 $1,650,000 Tower

Upgrade 0 $0 0 $0 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 Use of

State/County Property

0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0

Total $ 0 $1,240,000 $2,340,000 $2,340,000 Cost of

Property Acquisition

0 $0 1 $500,000 0 $1,025,000 0 $1,025,000

Total with Acquisition $ 0 $1,740,000 $3,365,000 $3,365,000

Tower B – Naylor Mill – new tower cost $500,000; property acquisition cost $0 Tower C – Pittsville – new tower cost $300,000; property acquisition cost $175,000 Tower D – Poplar Hill – new tower cost $300,000; property acquisition cost $175,000 Tower G – Fruitland – Tower upgrade cost $150,000; property acquisition cost $01 Tower J – Milestone – new tower cost $300,000; property acquisition cost $500,000 Tower K – Mardela Springs – new tower costs $250,000; property acquisition cost $175,000 1 If Fruitland tower cannot be upgraded, a new tower would add $650,000 to the total cost




>> Page 84 <<

SECTION V SYSTEM COST COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS The issued RFP by Wicomico County concerning Evaluation of Upgrade Options for the Public Safety Trunked Radio System sought a turnkey cost analysis of any options, which CTO believed should be considered for the new radio system. With the movement from an 800 MHz analog system to a new digital radio system, regardless of whether it operates on the Maryland FiRST system, the Maryland FiRST augment, a standalone 800 MHz system, or a hybrid 700/800 MHz system, a majority of the system components will need to be “replaced.” Motorola has provided Wicomico County with an “end of life” representation of the current system. “End of life” for a communications system has a very specific meaning. It this case:

Motorola will no longer be making replacement parts requiring any user to attempt to find spare parts either on the secondary market or

Motorola will no longer be supporting the old system with new software or hardware updates (Motorola over the last 14 years has issued 17 different operating versions of software)

While this may be acceptable to a home computer (or even to some non-essential operations), public safety communication is predicated on the system being completely operational, without a single point of failure with system redundancy. System costing can be broken down into several main categories for comparison purposes.

Tower and infrastructure costs PSAP and CPE costs Redundancy and backhaul costs Mobiles and portables for operations Operations and maintenance

One of the areas in which Concepts To Operations evaluated a potential for cost savings on the overall system was in using existing public real property for placement of infrastructure (i.e., towers). CTO attempted in its design to utilize property that was owned by other public entities, such as the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism. As noted in the following charts, CTO believes that the cost to the county for acquiring new property for placement of its new system towers would add more than $1.025 million dollars to the overall costs. CTO believes that in working with Maryland FiRST, MEIMSS, Wicomico County Board of Education, Maryland State Police, and Maryland State Highway Administration for location of the new towers on owned property will reduce the overall costs of the system. Should the county build its own towers, the possibility of opening the towers to commercial carriers is an option for revenue generation to offset the cost of construction. Commercial carriers have been known to work with government entities in: (1) building the tower and deeding it to the government for a rent reduction equal to its costs; (2) renting space on a tower owned by the government; or (3) building the tower and allowing the governmental entity to locate on the tower without cost. Over the 25-year life of a commercial lease, an individual tower can generate in excess of $2 million dollars in revenue. CTO notes that the county design for




>> Page 85 <<

location of specific structures should be the determining factor and not the location needed by a commercial carrier. As part of the analysis of this report, CTO evaluated 4 potential options for Wicomico County. Restating those options as follows:




Option 4 – Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system To facilitate comparisons, CTO has brought all of the costing information for each of the above referenced options into this section. CTO cautions that there is a reason why only Option 4 was recommended by Concepts To Operations. Looking solely at the less expensive costs of Options 1 and 2 would leave the county public safety system and the citizens of Wicomico County vulnerable. 5.1 COST OF MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM (OPTION 1)

The Maryland FiRST system is currently in operation for the Maryland State Police and a few state agencies that have been able to get mobiles and portables under the procurement contract with the vendor. The Maryland FiRST system was designed for on-street coverage only and has been guaranteed by the vendor to provide 95% on-street coverage with 95% reliability for Wicomico County. There is no vendor guarantee for any in-building coverage which is being provided by the system. As of the date of this report, the Maryland FiRST system will provide county users on the system only access to the existing infrastructure. All other costs (mobiles, portables, consoles, software) are to be borne by Wicomico County. A summary of the costs of Option 1 is detailed below Table V-1 Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system as the sole communications for the county Option 1 Qty Cost System Equipment Dish Antennas 0 $0 Antenna 0 $0 Cable 0 $0 Jumpers 0 $0 Trans/Receive 0 $0 Master Site 0 $0 Combiners 0 $0 Primary Power 0 $0 Backup Power 0 $0

Subtotal $ 0




>> Page 86 <<

Option 1 Qty Cost System Infrastructure Fiber Loop 0 $0 Microwave 0 $0 Tower Construction New Tower 0 $0 Tower Upgrade 0 $0 Use of State/County Property 0 $0

Subtotal $ 0 Cost of Property Acquisition 0 $0

Subtotal with Acquisition $ 0 Equipment Consoles 8 $750,000 Prime Site 0 $0

Subtotal $750,000

System Total $750,000 Current Radios 2,130 Mobiles 587 Portables 1,543 Mobiles Fully Compatible Now 20 Upgrade to Encrypted 20 $14,217 Replacement 567 $2,066,319 Install Costs $365,965

Subtotal 587 $2,446,501 Portables Fully Compatible Now 168 Flashing 168 $108,799 Non-Compatible Now 1,375 Encrypted 208 $772,928 Non-Encrypted 1167 $3,937,458

Subtotal 1,543 $4,819,185

Radio Total 2,130 $7,265,686 Vendor Installation 0 $0 Radio Shop 0 $0




>> Page 87 <<

Option 1 Qty Cost Estimated Turnkey Cost $8,015,686 Maintenance System (vendor) annually $200,000 # Software Upgrade Agreement annually $250,000 ‡ Infrastructure (vendor) annually $0 Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖ Estimated Maintenance Cost annually $550,000 Migration Assurance Program (optional) annually $550,000 §

Radio Shop Cost Breakout New Radio Shop 1 $0 Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖

# For maintenance of radios (currently $120,000 annually). ‡ Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola includes a bi-annual software upgrade (applicable to Options 1, 2 and 4), which all users on the system will be required to match (see Section 3.1.16.1.4). For Option 3 it is optional, but is included in total. § Not included in total (not applicable to Options 1 or 2 and optional for Options 3 and 4). ‖ Wicomico County Emergency Services Radio Division will require additional personnel and space (i.e., radio shop).

5.2 COST OF AUGMENTED MARYLAND FIRST SYSTEM (OPTION 2)

At the time of this report, the Maryland FiRST system is still in the construction phase, operational costs, electric, etc. is currently being funded out of the overall budget for Maryland DoIT and the Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola. At the time the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board takes control, one of the designated functions is to create a budget. Currently, it is expected that the budget would be part of the executive branch overall budget, similar to the budget requests of each department. The budget is subject to control by the governor and finally by the Maryland General Assembly, who can alter the budget of any board or entity including increasing that departmental budget or decreasing it. While the current program management office does not envision charging users, it is unlikely that the “no charge” system would continue once the true cost of operating the system is known. History shows that the General Assembly more often decreases budgets for individual boards and operations and further, over the last 30 years, has sought to transfer the responsibility of local cost back to the individual counties (highway user, pension, library, courts, etc.). For reference, Concepts To Operations has included, in Appendix C, examples for costing from a statewide system being passed onto local jurisdiction users (Michigan and Illinois). The cost




>> Page 88 <<

models can be by radio ($40 to $70 per month) or by user ($10 a Talkgroup (TG) per month) or a combination. It is important to note that, in both cases, the state agencies were exempt from contributions for their operations. A determination and comparison of costs related to Option 2 are identified and analyzed in Section 3.2.4 of this report. Table V-2 Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system and augmenting the system with one (1) new tower site Option 2 Qty Cost System Equipment Dish Antennas 5 $10,000 Antenna 6 $18,000 Cable 0 $0 Jumpers 12 $3,600 Trans/Receive 2 $1,000,000 Master Site 1 $1,300,000 Combiners 3 $90,000 Primary Power 1 $25,000 Backup Power 1 $100,000

Subtotal $2,546,600 System Infrastructure Fiber Loop 17 $340,000 Microwave 5 $100,000 Tower Construction New Tower 2 $800,000 Tower Upgrade 0 $0 Use of State/County Property 0 $0

Subtotal $1,240,000 Cost of Property Acquisition 0 $500,000

Subtotal with Acquisition $1,740,000 € Equipment Consoles 8 $750,000 Prime Site 1 $1,300,000

Subtotal $2,050,000

System Total $5,836,600 Current Radios 2,130 Mobiles 587 Portables 1,543 Mobiles Fully Compatible Now 20 Upgrade to Encrypted 20 $14,217




>> Page 89 <<

Option 2 Qty Cost Replacement 567 $2,066,319 Install Costs $365,965


Subtotal 1,543 $4,819,185

Radio Total 2,130 $7,265,686 Vendor Installation 1 $1,500,000 Radio Shop 0 $0 Estimated Turnkey Cost $14,602,286 Maintenance System (vendor) annually $200,000 # Software Upgrade Agreement annually $250,000 ‡ Infrastructure (vendor) annually $25,000 ‖ Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖ Estimated Maintenance Cost annually $575,000

Migration Assurance Program (optional) annually $550,000 §

Radio Shop Cost Breakout New Radio Shop 0 $0 Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖

€ It is recommended that the county use state or county owned property for location of new tower (board of education). For Option 2, the estimated savings from not having to acquire additional property is $500,000. The maintenance cost for the tower is approximately $25,000 per annum. † Turnkey cost does not include site acquisition, which would be an additional expense if required. # For maintenance of radios (currently $120,000 annually). ‡ Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola includes a bi-annual software upgrade (applicable to Options 1, 2 and 4), which all users on the system will be required to match (see Section 3.1.16.1.4). For Option 3 it is optional, but is included in total. § Not included in total (not applicable to Options 1 or 2 and optional for Options 3 and 4).




>> Page 90 <<

‖ Wicomico County Emergency Services Radio Division will require additional personnel and space (i.e., radio shop). External contract for tower maintenance will also be required (see Section 5.5).

5.3 COST OF STANDALONE 800 MHZ SYSTEM (OPTION 3)

The chart below summarizes the costs to the county in the development of a standalone 800 MHz system. CTO notes that the cost of the standalone system (Option 3) and the cost of the 700/800 MHz hybrid system (Option 4) are nearly identical. The basic components are the same, the difference is the use of the Maryland FiRST channels to solve the issue of channel capacity limitation. Table V-3 Development of a new standalone P25 Phase II compliant 800 MHz digital system with an Intra RF Subsystem Interface (ISSI) for interoperability Option 3 Qty Cost System Equipment Dish Antennas 10 $20,000 Antenna 18 $54,000 Cable 7,500 $25,000 Jumpers 54 $17,000 Trans/Receive 5 $2,500,000 Master Site 1 $1,300,000 Combiners 3 $90,000 Primary Power 4 $100,000 Backup Power 6 $600,000

Subtotal $4,706,000 System Infrastructure Fiber Loop 17 $340,000 Microwave 10 $200,000 Tower Construction New Tower 5 $1,650,000 Tower Upgrade 1 $150,000 Use of State/County Property 0 $0

Subtotal $2,340,000 Cost of Property Acquisition 0 $1,025,000


Subtotal $2,050,000

System Total $9,096,000 Current Radios 2,130 Mobiles 587 Portables 1,543




>> Page 91 <<

Option 3 Qty Cost Mobiles Fully Compatible Now 20 Upgrade to Encrypted 20 $14,217 Replacement 567 $2,066,319 Install Costs $365,965


Subtotal 1,543 $4,819,185

Radio Total 2,130 $7,265,686 Vendor Installation 1 $3,500,000 New Radio Shop 1 $250,000 Estimated Turnkey Cost $20,111,686 † Maintenance System (vendor) annually $200,000 # Software Upgrade Agreement annually $250,000 ‡ Infrastructure (vendor) annually $150,000 ‖ Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖ Estimated Maintenance Cost annually $700,000 Migration Assurance Program (optional) annually $550,000 § Radio Shop Cost Breakout New Radio Shop 1 $250,000 Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖

€ It is recommended that the county use state or county owned property for location of new towers. For Option 3, the estimated savings from not having to acquire additional property is $1.025 million. Also, if county is required to build a new tower at Fruitland, as opposed to upgrading the existing, than the additional cost would be $650,000. † Turnkey cost does not include site acquisition, which would be an additional expense if required. # For maintenance of radios (currently $120,000 annually).




>> Page 92 <<

‡ Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola includes a bi-annual software upgrade (applicable to Options 1, 2 and 4), which all users on the system will be required to match (see Section 3.1.16.1.4). For Option 3 it is optional, but is included in total. § Not included in total (not applicable to Options 1 or 2 and optional for Options 3 and 4). ‖ Wicomico County Emergency Services Radio Division will require additional personnel and space (i.e., radio shop). External contract for tower maintenance will also be required (see Section 5.5). ¶ Radio Shop expenses are included in Turnkey and Maintenance Totals, but are broken out separately here for convenience.

5.4 COST OF HYBRID 700/800 MHZ P25 PHASE II DIGITAL SYSTEM (OPTION 4)

As noted in the chart below, the costs of moving forward on the acquisition of the new radio system can be divided into several phases and segments. The phases are

RFP issuance Purchase of the system Installation of the infrastructure Acquisition of the mobile and portables Training Ongoing maintenance of the new system

Effective project management, development of a comprehensive analysis of what functions are needed on each radio and the use of competitive bidding process can all work to keep the costs of the new system to the lower end of the range. In addition, as noted in the tower section of this report, the use of state owned property for location of the new towers vs the county acquiring new property will reduce the costs of the project by more than a projected $1.025 million dollars.

Table V-4 Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system Option 4 Qty Cost System Equipment Dish Antennas 10 $20,000 Antenna 18 $54,000 Cable 7,500 $25,000 Jumpers 54 $17,000 Trans/Receive 5 $2,500,000 Master Site 1 $1,300,000 Combiners 3 $90,000 Primary Power 4 $100,000 Backup Power 6 $600,000

Subtotal $4,706,000 System Infrastructure Fiber Loop 17 $340,000 Microwave 10 $200,000 Tower Construction




>> Page 93 <<

Option 4 Qty Cost New Tower 5 $1,650,000 Tower Upgrade 1 $150,000 Use of State/County Property 0 $0

Subtotal $2,340,000 Cost of Property Acquisition 0 $1,025,000


Subtotal $2,050,000

System Total $9,096,000 Current Radios 2,130 Mobiles 587 Portables 1,543 Mobiles Fully Compatible Now 20 Upgrade to Encrypted 20 $14,217 Replacement 567 $2,066,319 Install Costs $365,965


Subtotal 1,543 $4,819,185

Radio Total 2,130 $7,265,686 Vendor Installation 1 $3,500,000 Radio Shop 1 $250,000 Estimated Turnkey Cost $20,111,686 Maintenance System (vendor) annually $200,000 # Software Upgrade Agreement annually $250,000 ‡




>> Page 94 <<

Option 4 Qty Cost Infrastructure (vendor) annually $150,000 ‖

Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖ Estimated Maintenance Cost annually $700,000 Migration Assurance Program (optional) annually $550,000 § Radio Shop Cost Breakout New Radio Shop 1 $250,000 Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 ‖

€ It is recommended that the county use state or county owned property for location of new towers. For Option 4, the estimated savings from not having to acquire additional property is $1.025 million. Also, if county is required to build a new tower at Fruitland, as opposed to upgrading the existing, than the additional cost would be $650,000. † Turnkey cost does not include site acquisition, which would be an additional expense if required. # For maintenance of radios (currently $120,000 annually).

‡ Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola includes a bi-annual software upgrade (applicable to Options 1, 2 and 4), which all users on the system will be required to match (see Section 3.1.16.1.4). For Option 3 it is optional, but is included in total. § Not included in total (not applicable to Options 1 or 2 and optional for Options 3 and 4). ‖ Wicomico County Emergency Services Radio Division will require additional personnel and space (i.e., radio shop). External contract for tower maintenance will also be required (see Section 5.5). ¶ Radio Shop expenses are included in Turnkey and Maintenance Totals, but are broken out separately here for convenience.




>> Page 95 <<

Table V-5 Side-By-Side Comparison of All Options Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost System Equipment

Dish Antennas 0 $0 5 $10,000 10 $20,000 10 $20,000 Antenna 0 $0 6 $18,000 18 $54,000 18 $54,000 Cable 0 $0 0 $0 7,500 $25,000 7,500 $25,000 Jumpers 0 $0 12 $3,600 54 $17,000 54 $17,000 Trans/Receive 0 $0 2 $1,000,000 5 $2,500,000 5 $2,500,000 Master Site 0 $0 1 $1,300,000 1 $1,300,000 1 $1,300,000 Combiners 0 $0 3 $90,000 3 $90,000 3 $90,000 Primary

Power 0 $0 1 $25,000 4 $100,000 4 $100,000

Backup Power 0 $0 1 $100,000 6 $600,000 6 $600,000 Subtotal $ 0 $2,546,600 $4,706,000 $4,706,000

System Infrastructure

Fiber Loop 0 $0 17 $340,000 17 $340,000 17 $340,000 Microwave 0 $0 5 $100,000 10 $200,000 10 $200,000 Tower

Construction

New Tower 0 $0 2 $800,000 5 $1,650,000 5 $1,650,000 Tower

Upgrade 0 $0 0 $0 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 Use of

State/County Property

0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0

Subtotal $ 0 $1,240,000 $2,340,000 $2,340,000 Cost of

Property Acquisition 0 $0

1 $500,000 0 $1,025,000 0 $1,025,000

Subtotal with Acquisition $ 0 $1,740,000 $3,365,000 $3,365,000 €

(see page 97) Equipment Consoles 8 $750,000 8 $750,000 8 $750,000 8 $750,000 Prime Site 0 $0 1 $1,300,000 1 $1,300,000 1 $1,300,000

Subtotal $750,000 $2,050,000 $2,050,000 $2,050,000

System Total $750,000 $5,836,600 $9,096,000 $9,096,000 Current Radios 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130

Mobiles 587 587 587 587 Portables 1,543 1,543 1,543 1,543 Mobiles




>> Page 96 <<

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Fully

Compatible Now 20 20 20 20

Upgrade to Encrypted 20 $14,217 20 $14,217 20 $14,217 20 $14,217

Replacement 567 $2,066,319 567 $2,066,319 567 $2,066,319 567 $2,066,319 Install Costs $365,965 $365,965 $365,965 $365,965

Subtotal 587 $2,446,501 587 $2,446,501 587 $2,446,501 587 $2,446,501 Portables Fully

Compatible Now 168 168 168 168

Flashing 168 $108,799 168 $108,799 168 $108,799 168 $108,799 Non-

Compatible Now 1,375 1,375 1,375 1,375

Encrypted 208 $772,928 208 $772,928 208 $772,928 208 $772,928 Non-Encrypted 1167 $3,937,458 1167 $3,937,458 1167 $3,937,458 1167 $3,937,458

Subtotal 1,543 $4,819,185 1,543 $4,819,185 1,543 $4,819,185 1,543 $4,819,185

Radio Total 2,130 $7,265,686 2,130 $7,265,686 2,130 $7,265,686 2,130 $7,265,686 Vendor Installation 0 $0 1 $1,500,000 1 $3,500,000 1 $3,500,000

Radio Shop 0 $0 0 $250,000 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 Estimated Turnkey Cost $8,015,686 $14,852,286 $20,111,686 $20,111,686 † Potential Competitive Bid Savings

$0 $0 -$4,000,000 -$4,000,000 ¥

Potential Turnkey Cost $8,015,686 $14,852,286 $16,111,686 $16,111,686

Maintenance System

(vendor) annually $200,000 annually $200,000 annually $200,000 annually $200,000 #

Software Upgrade Agreement

annually $250,000 annually $250,000 annually $250,000 annually $250,000 ‡

Infrastructure (vendor) annually $0 annually $25,000 annually $150,000 annually $150,000 ‖




>> Page 97 <<

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Radio Division Staffing

annually $100,000 annually $100,000 annually $100,000 annually $100,000 ‖

Estimated Maintenance Cost

annually $550,000 annually $575,000 annually $700,000 annually $700,000

Migration

Assurance Program (optional)

annually $550,000 annually $550,000 annually $550,000 annually $550,000

§

Radio Shop Cost Breakout

New Radio Shop 1 $0 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 1 $250,000

Radio Division Staffing annually $100,000 annually $100,000 annually $100,000 annually $100,000 ‖

€ It is recommended that the county use state or county owned property for location of new towers. For Option 2, the estimated savings from not having to acquire additional property is $500,000. For Options 3 and 4, the estimated savings from not having to acquire additional property is $1.025 million. Also, if county is required to build a new tower at Fruitland, as opposed to upgrading the existing, than the additional cost would be $650,000. † Turnkey cost does not include site acquisition, which would be an additional expense if required.

# For maintenance of radios (currently $120,000 annually).

‡ Maryland FiRST contract with Motorola includes a bi-annual software upgrade (applicable to Options 1, 2 and 4), which all users on the system will be required to match (see Section 3.1.16.1.4). For Option 3 it is optional, but is included in total.

§ Not included in total (not applicable to Options 1 or 2 and optional for Options 3 and 4). ‖ Wicomico County Emergency Services Radio Division will require additional personnel and space (i.e., radio shop). External contract for tower maintenance will also be required (see Section 5.5). ¶ Radio Shop expenses are included in Turnkey and Maintenance Totals, but are broken out separately here for convenience. ¥ As noted in section 5.6, of this report, competitive bidding of all or portions of the project vs. sole source or use of existing procurement agreements often result in decreasing overall cost of a project by 20%.

5.5 COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR NEW SYSTEM

Similar to the maintenance of a high tech computer system, the daily maintenance of a P25 system will require additional skills and knowledge different from those needed to maintain the existing analog system. The new P25 system has five (5) distinctive components, which will require skills to maintain. They are:




>> Page 98 <<

1) Towers and Compounds Depending upon the height, towers may require painting, lighting, and marking in compliance with FCC regulations. All compounds must be fenced and properly marked with signage. The FCC requires daily reporting of lighting as well as maintaining logbooks and other tower documentation. Compounds will require animal and weed control programs. Shelters at each of the compounds will require maintenance checks and repairs, including air conditioning and alarm systems. In addition to the regular power system, all critical infrastructure towers require a secondary power source (generator), which will also require a programed maintenance schedule. Wicomico County will be required to have a vendor maintenance contract on the five (5) new towers.

2) Fiber and Microwave Network Currently, Wicomico County does not maintain either a fiber optic routing system or a microwave backhaul system, instead relying upon MEIMSS for microwave and Verizon for fiber optics. With the necessity of redundancy in the system, skills and knowledge of both will be required. Testing and analysis of each microwave path, unless transferred to MEIMSS, should be placed on a quarterly program to ensure that all paths are clear and accurate. As taller construction occurs in the county, a program of review to ensure that no microwave path is obstructed without prior notice (6-10 months) to ensure that a re-routing of the pathway is possible. The county may be able to work with Maryland Broadband and its members concerning the fiber routing or contract with Verizon for use or maintenance of the additional fiber routing in the county called for in Option 4.

3) Radios (Mobiles and Portables) Currently performed in-house by Wicomico County Emergency Division staff and a local shop, the daily maintenance of radios is a near ending project. From dropped and damaged units, to reprogramming, or simple training for use, an in-house radio shop is a necessity. Concepts To Operations does not believe that the current staffing of the division will be able to “keep up” with the initial change (i.e., over 2,000 units), as well as the daily operational issues which arise. Once an RFP has been awarded for the radio (mobile and portable) portions of the project, the vendor and the county can develop a complete radio maintenance program/policy and can determine the optimal mix of in-house expertise and out-sourcing of technical assistance.

4) Consoles and System Hardware Consistent with the current system, the day in and day out maintenance and operation of system components will require additional skills and experience. During a typical day, at least one (1) console will need some attention, whether programing, rebooting, upgrades, interfaces equipment failure, or simply training. At the time of selection for consoles and hardware, the vendor will provide a training program as well as a maintenance plan.

5) System Interfaces (CAD, RMS) One of the most complex components of a new radio system is the interface with existing components and the interface with other vendor provided software programs. For public safety, the two major components are Computer Aided




>> Page 99 <<

Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (RMS). Each of these software programs develop large databases of information, which must be integrated as part of the new system. Working with the existing vendors or soliciting new software upgrades as part of the RFP for the new system should be considered.

Conclusion In the past, many jurisdictions have divided certain portions of the daily and annual maintenance between in-house staff and outsourcing those areas where individuals on staff do not have specific knowledge to vendor “radio shops.” With the new system, a significant upgrade in skills and knowledge will be required for all county personnel, as well as the augmentation of the existing staff. Each of the key vendors now offers substantial levels of support for a new system. Typically, the initial annual cost is less, due to the major systems all being on a one-year warranty program. Thus, the cost of the maintenance and repair is covered under a warranty contract. After that, each of the vendors will develop a system maintenance proposal covering the components that are subject to maintenance and repair. As noted in the turnkey cost chart, the expected annual contract is approximately $850,000 per year. 5.6 COST CONTROL AND COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS

It is the policy of Concepts To Operations to recommend a competitive bid process to our clients. While use of existing previously negotiated contracts or master supply contracts with the state can provide some benefit, it has been CTO’s experience that competitively bidding the radio system can result in a cost savings of 20% overall for the system. Unique to the utilization of the P25 foundation of a new radio system is the requirement that all of the different components have been certified to work within other vendors systems (i.e., radios from one vendor will function on a system purchased from another vendor). During the RFP process, CTO believes that Wicomico County may be in the posture to seek independent bids for different components such as:

Towers and installation Microwave Radio system Mobiles Portables Interfaces

Concepts To Operations also believes that while the project may be much more difficult to manage with multiple independent vendors, it will likely result in companies which are located within Wicomico County to bid on and secure contracts directly with the county rather than have one of the major vendors utilize local companies as subcontractors.




>> Page 100 <<

SECTION VI FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 A VIEW OF THE FUTURE

Communications technology is one of the fastest growing areas in today’s universe. Commercial providers are playing catch-up with moving from 2G (simple cell phone calls) to 4G (streaming live video and TV), which includes large amounts of data. The individual mobile phone has become an entertainment center to many individuals, far surpassing the use of the device for a simple phone call. This rapid expanding universe has and will continue to have an impact on the delivery of public safety communications. APCO P25 Standard APCO, in cooperation with the FCC and a number of public and private agencies, took on the task of developing a standardized platform for implementation of future communications. The movement from analog signalization to digital was based upon the FCC seeking to have all users gravitate to a more efficient use of spectrum. This allowed for the creation of the P25 standard platform. P25 Phase I With the movement to a digital format, users were also required to do the initial narrowbanding (i.e., from 25 kHz channels to 12.5 kHz channels). While it does not provide additional spectrum, P25 Phase I allows for a more efficient use of the existing frequencies and allows movement away from analog technology, which can alleviate potential interference. P25 Phase II P25 Phase II compliance (further narrowbanding to 6.25 kHz) is being driven by the FCC. While not mandated yet, the FCC recommends users narrowband to 6.25 kHz channels when replacing their existing systems, as eventually it will be a mandated standard. It is expected by 2018, the FCC will issue a mandate to 6.25 kHz channels. Therefore, Concepts To Operations recommends any new system implemented in the county be Phase II compliant. While all vendors have ensured their Phase II systems will be backward compatible with Phase I operations, Phase I systems will have to be narrowbanded to work with Phase II systems. Concepts To Operations notes the Central Maryland Regional System (CMRS - Baltimore County and Baltimore City) has already filed a request for a waiver of the narrowbanding, indicating that they need to remain wideband. The system being designed for Wicomico County is expected to be operational in 2017/2018 and should take into account the future of digital operations. Concepts To Operations recommends the new system be P25 Phase II compliant (with a move to the 6.25 kHz channels. Concepts To Operations cannot determine whether the FCC will seek to further narrowband as technology permits or whether the commission will seek the return for reallocation of the frequencies within the operating region.




>> Page 101 <<

NENA i3 In June 2011, the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) released its technical documents supporting the move to an IP-based infrastructure (i3). The development of these standards for the creation of communications networks was aimed at providing public safety entities including PSAP’s with a standard communication architecture that would be universal. With commercial communications moving to an IP-based system, wireline carriers have requested that the FCC issue a mandated date on which they would no longer have to support non-IP-based phone (e.g., plain old telephone service (POTS)), NENA saw the future. The i3 architecture provides that all connections to and from the PSAP would be IP-based. The documentation of the proposed architecture is detailed specific to public safety systems. Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) The next generation of 9-1-1 has been the phrase used to describe the future of 9-1-1 calls from the public to the PSAPs. The FCC has already mandated that all commercial carriers will provide, at minimum, text to the PSAP. To that end, there are a number of testing beds being used across the country where the commercial carrier has assisted the PSAP to upgrade console hardware and software to accept text transmissions from callers. This, however, is only the first step. Expected shortly after the upgrade to accept text is the reception of video and pictures directly from the 9-1-1 caller to the PSAP. While some public safety communications systems currently have streaming video from MDT to dispatch, few centers have adapted fully integrated systems that accepts streaming video/pictures from callers. This type of transmission has a significant impact, not only on the equipment, but also on the bandwidth and spectrum use of the commercial carrier and on the PSAP with the retransmission of the data to field personnel. Spectrum Use The FCC has stated for both commercial and public safety communication systems that spectrum efficiency is the key. To that end, the FCC mandated Phase I narrowbanding to 12.5 kHz channels in the 700 MHz band by January 1, 2015 and Phase II to 6.25 kHz channels by January 1, 2017. With each generation of digital transmitters and receivers, the use and efficiency of existing channels improve. However, taking a lesson from the commercial carriers, it is not the number of calls that a channel can handle which is the determining factor, but rather the size of the transmission. As the commercial side, public safety communications will be faced with spectrum limitations not based upon the number of devises in use but rather by the transmission of data (i.e., text, streaming video or additional information) which in the past has been relayed by voice. The movement to LTE (Long Term Evolution) and Voice over LTE (VoLTE) is the future of all communication whether it is commercial or public safety. A simple explanation of LTE is that it allows an IP-based network to run over the radio frequency network. LTE uses packet switching to transport data, which has been packetized, allowing for a substantial amount of information to pass along the same spectrum. Two of the four (4) major commercial carriers show a majority of the county already has 4G services with plans by the other two (2) carriers to upgrade their current 3G systems to 4G.




>> Page 102 <<

CAD and RMS The future of Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Record Management System (RMS) are tied to the implementation of NG9-1-1. As the information that is provided by the caller to dispatch increases (e.g., streaming video), the need to access and store that information will correspondingly increase. While the equipment will be able to accept and utilize the information in real-time, the amount of storage and retrieval of information will require larger and larger data storage systems. The Cloud By presidential executive order, all federal government agencies are mandated to move their applications to the cloud. The cloud is a concept that has been available in the private sector for over a decade, but is just now being adapted by governmental agencies. The cloud will allow multi-jurisdictional users to access incident information in real time seamlessly without the need for “specific” dispatch transfer. It is envisioned that the officer in the field will be able to pull information directly from the cloud (think of the cloud as a large database). NENA and APCO envision that the use of the “cloud” is the most appropriate and cost effective way for storage and access to such information. All of the radio system major vendors as well as the supporting independent software providers have indicated that their product information that their design are compatible with use of the cloud application, thus allowing regional sharing of critical incident data. Private Building Public Safety Systems In 2006, the Wicomico County Commissioners adopted the Public Safety Radio Amplification System, which provided that all new construction in the county would require the inclusion of a communication system which was compatible with the county system so that in-building coverage would be ensured. During the interviews, it was determined that none of the new buildings complied with the 2006 law (amended in 2007). Wicomico County is on the right track to ensure that once new communication system is built that all building (old and new) will meet acceptable in-building voice communication. 6.2 OPTION COMPARISONS





Option 4 – Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system

Corpor

Figure VI-

6.2.1 OP

Marylandsystem fsystem isusers foroccur in designedprimary ujurisdictio Channel With the to allowinthe dispaavailableOption 1controls 700 MHzthe exaccurrent cfor tomorchannelsas requechannels

rate Offices: 801

1 Option 1 – S

PTION 1 – M

d FiRST wasfor state ages designed r Maryland F

the event d to provideuser of the sons througho

l Capacity

implementang Wicomicoatch center te, bandwidth

would limitthe public s

z channels toct amount oconfigurationrrow. The 80s available toested by a nus (requiring a

Evaluat

Compass Way,

Sites Only

ARYLAND

s designed encies first rto provide aFiRST at theof an emer strong signsystem is theout the state

ation of the no County to o first respo

h (channel ct the county

safety channo public safef bandwidth

n of 800 MH00 MHz rebo Wicomico umber of lawa whole chan

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>> P

FIRST

and built (Presponders aa single come time of thrgency anywnal strength e Maryland

e.

new radio sydetermine w

onders in thecapacity) wiy to the 700nels in the 7ety instead rh for future Hz channels,

anding procCounty. In a

w enforcemennel), thus p


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 103 <<

Phase 1 andacross the S

mmunication is report), swhere in the

to the overState Police

ystem, accewhat availabe field. Whilell be the lim

0 MHz band00 MHz baneserving theoperations , while meetcess showedaddition, theent personnepotentially cr


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

<

d Phase 2) aState of Marsystem for

so that seame State of r 6,500 use

e who will ha

ess to commble informatioe there is a mmiting factord. At the cund. The FCCem for FirstNis unknownting today’s d that there e movement el, will decrereating a pro


24-8911 – cto@c

as a unified ryland. The state agenc

mless commMaryland. T

ers of the stave a seaml

munication chon is transmmountain of r for utilizaturrent time, C has not o

Net across thn, what is k

needs, will are limited of the systeease the curoblem on the


concepts2ops.co

communicaMaryland F

cies (16 listeunications wThe systemtate system.less system

hannels is cmitted to and

data that mation of that Maryland F

opened addithe country. Wnown is thanot be suff

excess 800 em to encryprrent utilizatie system.

ounty tem(s)

om

ations FiRST ed as would was . The in all

critical from ay be data.

FiRST tional While at the ficient MHz

ption, ion of




>> Page 104 <<

The scope of work for this report requires a view of communications systems 10-15 years in the future. Concepts To Operations provided that view in this report. In order to deliver what CTO views as the future of public safety communications, access to additional channels is necessary and Option 1 does not meet that requirement. In-building Coverage The system was not designed to provide any in-building coverage for users. While the system, as tested, is performing better than expected and providing in-building coverage in some locations, it does not, and was not, designed for the type of in-building coverage necessary for local first responders, particularly in high-density modern buildings and hospitals. Agencies and entities that require in-building coverage should fully test the system for in-building coverage. Additional towers and/or BDAs may be required to cover individual needs. At the time of this report, no supplemental in-building coverage is operating on the Maryland FiRST system. The lack of reliable and robust in-building coverage is the most significant drawback to utilizing the Maryland FiRST system. Sustainability An additional presumption and foundation of the Maryland FiRST system was that all existing resources (i.e., tower, backhaul, and shelters) were to be included in the original design of the system. This decision includes 5 of the 6 towers that were built in Wicomico County. The towers, which range in age from 3 years to over 30 years, do not meet the current standards for Category 3 infrastructure under TIA 222 Rev. G All of the towers for Wicomico County are placed in open areas where there are no natural wind breaks. Reports from Hurricane Sandy showed at time of impact to Cape May Courthouse in NJ the wind speed was 90 mph. Sandy had a top wind speed of 115 mph and the wind speed prior to landfall exceeded 110 mph on the leading edge. Hurricane Katrina showed a top wind speed of 175 mph and a landfall wind speed exceeded 125 mph with leading edge wind speed in excess of 135 mph. Statistics show that Ocean City takes a direct hit from a hurricane every 16 years with an average wind speed of 90 mph and on average has a major evacuation event every 2.6 years. Because of the need for sustainability, CTO believes that design and construction for sustainability at wind speeds of 110 mph to 120 mph, which includes towers, system redundancy, and buildings. When designing and building public safety infrastructure, CTO does not believe it is prudent to use the minimal standard of sustainability particularly for communication towers. With each event, public safety entities have seen commercial towers collapse, while much of the infrastructure designed in excess of minimal standard for Category 3 infrastructure has remained intact. Redundancy Consistent with the standards that Concepts To Operations believe are necessary for sustainability noted above, CTO strongly believes that all public safety communications systems must have redundancy built into the system. Whether the redundancy is provided by Maryland FiRST or by Wicomico County is the determination to be made. A review of the Maryland FiRST




>> Page 105 <<

system, as constructed, lacks backhaul system redundancy. Concepts To Operations notes that several of the critical towers located in Wicomico County are served by either fiber optic or MIEMSS microwave, not both. Should one path fail, communications in the sector would be lost. Concepts To Operations also notes, should the towers mentioned in the sustainability section be impacted by an emergency, both the state and county systems would be compromised. Thus neither partner could rely upon the other for redundancy. While the likelihood is small, it must be noted. Interoperability The Maryland FiRST system offers a unique opportunity for interoperability across the entire state. Should there be a statewide emergency, a single system would allow communications across all jurisdictions, rather than be limited to communications only on the Eastern Shore. While important, CTO notes that it is unaware of any circumstance where resources were sent from Allegany County to Wicomico County that required uninterrupted communications. The new mobile/portable radios regardless of the system utilized by Wicomico County will have the ability to be programed with 700 MHz channels including the dedicated statewide channel from Maryland FiRST system.

188 Existing radios to be flashed for upgrade 409 Mobile radios will be required to be purchased new (non-encrypted) 158 Mobile radio will be required to be purchased new (encrypted)

1,167 Portable radios will be required to be purchased new (non-encrypted) 208 Portable radio will be required to be purchased new (encrypted)

CONCLUSION: While utilization of the Maryland FiRST system solves certain costs and timeline implementation issues for Wicomico County, it:

Lacks guarantee by Motorola of in-building coverage sufficient to provide robust and dependable voice and data (talk-out/talk-back) in Wicomico County to first responder community

Lacks the ability to sustain wind speeds in excess of 120 mph on the older towers DAQ for on-street was designed at 3.0 and not DAQ 3.4 Lacks control of the system as it grows Lacks control of future costs Lacks control to determine the best interest for the citizens of Wicomico County

Concepts To Operations cannot recommend the use of the Maryland FiRST system, as it is built today, as the primary public safety communication system for Wicomico County first responders.

Corpor

Figure VI-2

6.2.2 OP

Based uTo Operaugmentthe systeaugmentcommun

Channel With the to allowinthe dispaavailableOption 2Maryland

rate Offices: 801

2 Option 2 – S

PTION 2 – A

pon the aborations perfot the Marylanem. Using cted to “comeications for i

Upgrade Construct

state towe Addition o

fiber and Addition o

state facil

l Capacity

implementang Wicomicoatch center te, bandwidth2, like Optiod FiRST con

Evaluat

Compass Way,

Sites Only

UGMENTED

ove noted shormed an and FiRST syomputer mo

e closer” to aits citizens. T

of the 5 Martion of a newers of new fiber cable conne

of 6 new miclities and the

ation of the no County to o first respo

h (channel con 1, would ntrols the pu

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>> P

D MARYLAN

hortcomingsanalysis to ystem to decodeling, CTOachieving ceThose augm

ryland State w tower at th

optic cable rections for thcrowave pathe additional 3

new radio sydetermine w

onders in thecapacity) wi

limit the cublic safety


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 106 <<

ND FIRST 7

s of the exisdetermine wcrease the iO believes trtain goals o

mentations in

towers to Re Bennett S

runs conneche 2 new addhs connectin3 towers

ystem, accewhat availabe field. Whilell be the limounty to thechannels in


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

<

700 MHZ SY

sting Marylanwhat improvtems that Chat the Mar

of the countynclude the fo

Rev. G 110 mSchool Comp

cting the 3 stditional toweng and creat

ess to commble informatioe there is a mmiting factore 700 MHz

n the 700 M


24-8911 – cto@c

YSTEM

nd FiRST syvements co

CTO believesryland FiRSTy for providinollowing:

mph standardplex, over an

tate towers ters ting redunda

munication chon is transmmountain of r for utilizat

z band. At tMHz band. T


concepts2ops.co

ystem, Concould be mads are essentT system cang first respo

ds nd above the

that do not h

ancy on all o

hannels is cmitted to and

data that mation of that the current

The FCC ha

ounty tem(s)

om

cepts de to tial to an be onder

e 6

have

of the

critical from ay be data. time, s not




>> Page 107 <<

opened additional 700 MHz channels to public safety instead reserving them for FirstNet across the country. While the exact amount of bandwidth for future operations is unknown, what is known is that the current configuration of 800 MHz channels, while meeting today’s needs, will not be sufficient for tomorrow. The 800 MHz rebanding process showed that there are limited excess 800 MHz channels available to Wicomico County. In addition, the movement of the system to encryption, as requested by a number of law enforcement personnel, will decrease the current utilization of channels (requiring a whole channel), thus potentially creating a problem on the system. The scope of work for this report requires a view of communications systems 10-15 years in the future. Concepts To Operations provided that view in this report. In order to deliver what CTO views as the future of public safety communications, access to additional channels is necessary and Option 2 does not meet that requirement. In-building Coverage With the addition of two (2) new tower sites, in-building coverage for low-density buildings across the county improves marginally. In-building coverage for medium-density buildings improves significantly. In-building coverage for high-density building increases substantially. Concepts To Operations notes that the spot check for in-building coverage done on February 27, 2014 provided evidence that the Maryland FiRST system in-building coverage exceeded their projections. Without significant testing of all public and private buildings, Concepts To Operations is unable to determine the “true” in-building coverage provided by the Maryland FiRST system. Sustainability The addition of two (2) towers and the structural analysis (outside the scope of this RFP) of the state towers to sustain wind loads of 120 mph would be necessary for the augmented system. Without individual structural reports, Concepts To Operations cannot determine which towers can be modified and which towers would have to be replaced. For the purpose of this report, Concepts To Operations assumes that each tower would require substantial improvements making it likely that all of the state towers would need to be replaced. During the construction and design of the Maryland FiRST system, the design team was told to use all tower resources of the state unless coverage (on-street) could not be guaranteed. This decision includes 5 of the 6 towers that were built in Wicomico County. The towers, which range in age from 3 years to over 30 years, do not meet the current standards for Category 3 critical infrastructure under TIA 222 Rev. G. All of the towers for Wicomico County are placed in open areas where there are no natural wind breaks. Reports from Hurricane Sandy showed at time of impact to Cape May Courthouse in NJ the wind speed was 90 mph. Sandy had a top wind speed of 115 mph and the wind speed prior to landfall exceeded 110 mph on the leading edge. Hurricane Katrina showed a top wind speed of 175 mph and a landfall wind speed exceeded 125 mph with leading edge wind speed in excess of 135 mph. Statistics show that Ocean City takes a direct hit from a hurricane every 16 years with an average wind speed of 90 mph and on average has a major evacuation event every 2.6 years. Because of the need for sustainability, CTO believes that design and construction for




>> Page 108 <<

sustainability at wind speeds of 110 mph to 120 mph, which includes towers, system redundancy, and buildings. When designing and building public safety infrastructure, CTO does not believe that it is prudent to use the minimal standard of sustainability particularly for communication towers. With each event, public safety entities have seen commercial tower after commercial tower fail. While much of the infrastructure is designed in excess of the minimal standard for Category 3 critical infrastructure has remained intact. Redundancy As noted above in Option 1, Concepts To Operations strongly believes that all public safety communications systems must have redundancy built into the talk-out and talk-back system. Whether the redundancy is provided by Maryland FiRST or by Wicomico County is the determination to be made. A review of the Maryland FiRST system as it was constructed lacks backhaul system redundancy. Concepts To Operations notes that several of the critical towers located in Wicomico County are served by either fiber optic or MIEMSS microwave, not both. Should one path fail, communications in the sector would be lost. Concepts To Operations has provided a recommendation to upgrade the seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic connections to all of the towers and has recommended adding ten (10) additional microwave links in the county to the MIEMSS system. No individual analysis has been done to determine whether those links are currently available should the county selection Option 2. As noted in Option 1, Concepts To Operations also notes that should the towers discussed in the sustainability section be impacted by an emergency, both the state and county systems would be out of operation. Thus, neither partner could rely upon the other for redundancy. While the likelihood is small, it must be noted. Maryland FiRST while providing multiple prime sites would not lose statewide communications, though it would be left without communications in Wicomico County. Interoperability Identical to the discussion in Option 1, The Maryland FiRST system offers a unique opportunity for interoperability across the entire state of Maryland. Should there be a statewide emergency, a single system would allow communications across all jurisdictions, rather than be limited to communications only on the shore. While important, Concepts To Operations notes that it is unaware of any circumstances where resources were sent from Allegany County to Wicomico County that required uninterrupted communications. The new mobile/portable radios regardless of the system utilized by Wicomico County will have the ability to be programmed with 700 MHz channels, including the dedicated statewide channel from Maryland FiRST.






>> Page 109 <<

CONCLUSION: Concepts To Operations cannot recommend the adoption of Option 2 – the Maryland FiRST augmented system as it:

Lacks guarantee by Motorola of in-building coverage sufficient to provide robust and dependable voice and data (talk-out/talk-back) in Wicomico County to first responder community

Uses Wicomico County taxpayer funds to upgrade state infrastructure Lacks the ability to sustain wind speeds in excess of 120 mph on the older towers Was designed for DAQ on-street at 3.0 and not DAQ 3.4 Lacks control of the system as it grows Lacks control of future costs Lacks control to determine the best interest for the citizens of Wicomico County

Figure VI-3 Option 3 – Sites Only

6.2.3 OPTION 3 – NEW 800 MHZ P25 PHASE II STANDALONE RADIO SYSTEM

Channel Capacity With the Implementation of the new radio system, access to communication channels is critical to allowing Wicomico County to determine what information, from what is available, is transmitted to and from the dispatch center and to first responders in the field. While there is a mountain of data that may be available, bandwidth (channel capacity) will be the limiting factor for utilization of that data. Option 3 limits the county to just the 800 MHz band without access to the 700 MHz band. While the exact amount of bandwidth for future operations is unknown, what is known is that the current configuration of 800 MHz channels, while meeting today’s needs, will not be sufficient for tomorrow. The 800 MHz rebanding process showed that there are




>> Page 110 <<

limited excess 800 MHz channels available to Wicomico County. In addition, the movement of the system to encryption as requested by a number of law enforcement personnel will decrease the current utilization of channels (requires a whole channel), thus potentially creating a problem on the system. The scope of work for this report requires a view of communications systems 10-15 years in the future. Concepts To Operations provided that view in this report. In order to deliver what CTO views as the future of public safety communications, access to additional channels is necessary. In-building Coverage In the design and development of a new system, Concepts To Operations believes that in-building coverage will become the critical factor in the future. Most emergency calls will be by cell phone from indoor locations requiring a response system to have the same level of penetration as the systems being deployed by commercial carriers. Concepts To Operations utilizes a 3 building type modeling system.

Low-density – wood frame single family houses, outbuildings Medium-density – concrete structure, garden-style apartments and chicken coops High-density – modern construction of steel, with reflective windows and LEED

construction standards CTO reviewed the county structures with the Department of Planning and through a review of Google Earth noting that:

Western area of the county was dominated by low-density buildings Eastern portion of the county was dominated by low-density buildings North central portion of the county (e.g. Delmar) dominated by medium-density

buildings Mid-central portion of the county (e.g., Route 13) dominated by high-density

buildings (hospital, government center, office buildings, apartments and the university)

South center portion of the county (e.g., Fruitland) dominated by low-density and medium-density buildings

CTO utilized signal loss factors in each of the above categories and locations to develop a design that would provide sufficient in-building coverage for a fully-geared firefighter. The new six (6) site system meets the coverage requirements and standards that CTO believes are necessary to provide the county first responders with a robust communication system. Sustainability During the system analysis period, CTO was provided with a report on the structural engineering of the prime site located at Naylor Road. Utilizing the TIA 222, Rev. G standard for Class III structures with wind load of 110 mph, the tower failed on 90% of the members with some levels exceeding 240% of the recommended tower strength.




>> Page 111 <<

Concepts To Operations notes that all of the county towers are placed in open areas where there are no natural wind breaks. Reports from Hurricane Sandy showed at time of impact to Cape May Courthouse in NJ the wind speed was 90 mph. Sandy had a top wind speed of 115 mph and the wind speed prior to landfall exceeded 110 mph on the leading edge. Hurricane Katrina showed a top wind speed of 175 mph and a landfall wind speed exceeded 125 mph with leading edge wind speed in excess of 135 mph. Statistics show that Ocean City takes a direct hit from a hurricane every 16 years with an average wind speed of 90 mph and on average has a major evacuation event every 2.6 years. Because of the need for sustainability, CTO believes that design and construction for sustainability at wind speeds of 110 mph to 120 mph, which includes towers, system redundancy, and buildings. When designing and building public safety infrastructure, CTO does not believe that it is prudent to use the minimal standard of sustainability particularly for communication towers. With each event, public safety entities have seen commercial tower after commercial tower fail. While much of the infrastructure designed in excess of minimal standard for Category 3 infrastructure has remained intact. Concepts To Operations would recommend the construction of six (6) new self-supporting towers located in designated areas of the county designed to sustain wind loads of 120 mph. Concepts To Operations utilizes a range of 200-380 feet for tower heights in its calculations. Redundancy As noted above in Option 1 and Option 2, Concepts To Operations strongly believes that all public safety communications systems must have redundancy built into the talk-out and talk-back system. The existing analog system utilizes the microwave backhaul system from MIEMSS. Concepts To Operations has provided a recommendation to upgrade the seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic connections to the new six (6) towers and has recommended adding ten (10) additional microwave links in the county to the MIEMSS system. No individual analysis has been done to determine whether those links are currently available should the county select Option 3. Should any new county tower be located near the Pittsville and Poplar Hill towers, Maryland FiRST has indicated a desire to connect to the new fiber network once it is complete. Unfortunately, BTOP funding is no longer available. However, the FCC and the federal government have announced two (2) new programs for connecting facilities to broadband, which may be available at the time of construction of the system. Interoperability The construction of a standalone P25 Phase II system would allow for the implementation of an ISSI (Inter Sub-site Interface) allowing for seamless communications with Maryland FiRST and with Delaware beyond those radios that are specifically programed with the interoperability channels. Should there be a statewide emergency, a single system would allow communications across all jurisdictions, rather than be limited to communications only on the Eastern Shore. While important, Concepts To Operations notes that it is unaware of any




>> Page 112 <<

circumstance where resources were sent from Allegany County to Wicomico County that required uninterrupted communications. The new mobile/portable radios, regardless of the system utilized by Wicomico County, will have the ability to be programed with 700 MHz channels, including the dedicated statewide channels from Maryland FiRST system. Concepts To Operations has reviewed the interoperability partners in evaluation of Option 3, and notes this option allows the county flexibility to continue to use their paging system, continue to be interoperable with VHF and UHF channels of those still utilizing their narrowbanded frequencies, as well as have access to the Maryland FiRST statewide channel for use in statewide emergencies. Concepts To Operations believes that the following mobile and radio units will be necessary for the future system:



CONCLUSION: Concepts To Operations cannot recommend this option for the following reasons:

While existing 800 MHz channels meet the current needs, there is insufficient capacity to provide communications options in the long term

Current channels will not meet the needs of the county for implementation of NG9-1-1, with additional data being provided to first responders by the dispatch center

Public safety cannot rely upon the use of commercial wireless providers for data transmission of critical information (I.e., Boston Marathon explosion experience)

Corpor

Figure VI-4

6.2.4 OP

Channel With the to allowtransmittmountainfor utilizathe 700 Mis knownwill not blimited exthe systethe curreon the sy The scopfuture. Cviews as In-buildi In the debuilding cell phon

rate Offices: 801

4 Option 4 – S

PTION 4 – 70

l Capacity

Implementaing Wicomied to and fr

n of data thaation of that MHz band. Wn is that the be sufficienxcess 800 M

em to encrypent utilizationystem.

pe of work foConcepts To

the future o

ng Coverag

esign and dcoverage wne from ind

Evaluat

Compass Way,

Sites Only

00/800 MHZ

ation of the nco County

rom the dispat may be avdata. OptionWhile the ex

current cont for tomorrMHz channeption as requn of channels

or this reportOperations

of public safe

ge

developmentill become tdoor locatio

Ction of Upgrad

Concepts T

Suite 217, Anna

>> P

Z HYBRID P2

new radio syto determi

patch center vailable, bann 3 limits thexact amount nfiguration orow. The 80els availableuested by a s (requires a

t requires a provided th

ety communi

t of a new the critical fans requiring


To Operatio

polis, MD 21401

Page 113 <<

25 PHASE I

ystem, accene what inand to first

ndwidth (chae county to jof bandwidt

of 800 MHz 00 MHz reb to Wicomicnumber of la

a whole chan

view of comhat view in tications, acc

system, Coactor in the g a respons


ons, Inc.

-7813 – (410) 22

<

II RADIO SY

ess to commnformation, responders

annel capacust the 800 th for future channels, w

banding procco County. Iaw enforcemnnel), thus p

mmunicationshis report. Icess to addit

oncepts To future. Mosse system


24-8911 – cto@c

YSTEM

munication chfrom what in the field.

city) will be tMHz band woperations i

while meetincess showen addition, t

ment personpotentially cr

s systems 1n order to dtional chann

Operations st emergencyto have the


concepts2ops.co

hannels is cis availabl

. While therethe limiting fwithout acceis unknown, g today’s ne

ed that therethe moveme

nnel will decrreating a pro

0-15 years ideliver what nels is neces

believes thay calls will be same lev

ounty tem(s)

om

critical le, is e is a factor ess to

what eeds, e are ent of rease oblem

in the CTO

ssary.

at in-be by vel of




>> Page 114 <<

penetration as the systems being deployed by commercial carriers. Concepts To Operations utilizes a 3 building type modeling system.

Low-density – wood frame single family houses, outbuildings Medium-density – concrete structure, garden-style apartments and chicken coops High-density – modern construction of steel, with reflective windows and LEED

construction standards CTO reviewed the county structures with the Department of Planning and through a review of Google Earth noting that:

Western area of the county was dominated by low-density buildings Eastern portion of the county was dominated by low-density buildings North central portion of the county (e.g. Delmar) dominated by medium-density

buildings Mid-central portion of the county (e.g., Route 13) dominated by high-density

buildings (hospital, government center, office buildings, apartments and the university)

South center portion of the county (e.g., Fruitland) dominated by low-density and medium-density buildings

CTO utilized signal loss factors in each of the above categories and locations to develop a design that would provide sufficient in-building coverage for a fully-geared firefighter. The new six (6) site system meets the coverage requirements and standards that CTO believes are necessary to provide the county first responders with a robust communication system. Sustainability During the system analysis period, CTO was provided with a report on the structural engineering of the prime site located at Naylor Road. Utilizing the TIA 222, Rev. G standard for Class III structures with wind load of 110 mph, the tower failed on 90% of the members with some levels exceeding 240% of the recommended tower strength. Concepts To Operations notes that all of the county towers are placed in open areas where there are no natural wind breaks. Reports from Hurricane Sandy showed at time of impact to Cape May Courthouse in NJ the wind speed was 90 mph. Sandy had a top wind speed of 115 mph and the wind speed prior to landfall exceeded 110 mph on the leading edge. Hurricane Katrina showed a top wind speed of 175 mph and a landfall wind speed exceeded 125 mph with leading edge wind speed in excess of 135 mph. Statistics show that Ocean City takes a direct hit from a hurricane every 16 years with an average wind speed of 90 mph and on average has a major evacuation event every 2.6 years. Because of the need for sustainability, CTO believes that design and construction for sustainability at wind speeds of 110 mph to 120 mph, which includes towers, system redundancy, and buildings. When designing and building public safety infrastructure, CTO does not believe that it is prudent to use the minimal standard of sustainability particularly for communication towers. With each




>> Page 115 <<

event, public safety entities have seen commercial tower after commercial tower fail. While much of the infrastructure designed in excess of minimal standard for Category 3 infrastructure has remained intact. Concepts To Operations would recommend the construction of six (6) new self-supporting towers located in designated areas of the county designed to sustain wind loads of 120 mph. Concepts To Operations utilizes a range of 200-380 feet for tower heights in its calculations. Redundancy As noted above in Option 1 and Option 2, Concepts To Operations strongly believes that all public safety communications systems must have redundancy built into the talk-out and talk-back system. The existing analog system utilizes the microwave backhaul system from MIEMSS. Concepts To Operations has provided a recommendation to upgrade the seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic connections to the new six (6) towers and has recommended adding ten (10) additional microwave links in the county to the MIEMSS system. No individual analysis has been done to determine whether those links are currently available should the county select Option 3. Should any new county tower be located near the Pittsville and Poplar Hill towers, Maryland FiRST has indicated a desire to connect to the new fiber network once it is complete. Unfortunately, BTOP funding is no longer available. However, the FCC and the federal government have announced two (2) new programs for connecting facilities to broadband, which may be available at the time of construction of the system. Interoperability The construction of a standalone P25 Phase II system would allow for the implementation of an ISSI (Inter Sub-site Interface) allowing for seamless communications with Maryland FiRST and with Delaware beyond those radios that are specifically programed with the interoperability channels. Should there be a statewide emergency, a single system would allow communications across all jurisdictions, rather than be limited to communications only on the Eastern Shore. While important, Concepts To Operations notes that it is unaware of any circumstance where resources were sent from Allegany County to Wicomico County that required uninterrupted communications. The new mobile/portable radios, regardless of the system utilized by Wicomico County, will have the ability to be programed with 700 MHz channels, including the dedicated statewide channels from Maryland FiRST system. Concepts To Operations has reviewed the interoperability partners in evaluation of Option 3, and notes this option allows the county flexibility to continue to use their paging system, continue to be interoperable with VHF and UHF channels of those still utilizing their narrowbanded frequencies, as well as have access to the Maryland FiRST statewide channel for use in statewide emergencies. Concepts To Operations believes that the following mobile and radio units will be necessary for the future system:




>> Page 116 <<



CONCLUSION: Concepts To Operations believes that it is in the best interest of Wicomico County and its citizens to adopt Option 4. Concepts To Operations has reached this recommendation because:

The hybrid system provides Wicomico County options to expand its limited channel capacity utilizing either 700 MHz channels or 800 MHz channels

The hybrid system utilizes the ISSI functions of the Maryland FiRST system for continued interoperability functions with the State of Delaware

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to harden its infrastructure to ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G standards to sustain winds loads over 120 mph

The hybrid system allows the county to maintain full control over the operations and upgrades of its system

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to maintain its paging system and to control its future use

The hybrid system allows the county to develop and maintain a robust in-building communication system which will be guaranteed to provide a 3.4 DAQ or greater across all types of building structures in the county with 97% coverage/97% reliability

The hybrid system will allow for the creation of a fully redundant backhaul system with the installation of an additional seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic cables and ten (10) new microwave links

The hybrid system will allow the county to control expansion of the communications system and operations of non-emergency communications, including other county agencies currently not on the system

The radio system that would be implemented as part of this system process will be quite different from radio systems in the past. Previously, the focus of a radio system has been the voice communications from the PSAP to the first responder, and vice-versa. In the future, the radio system will be required to provide: (1) voice to/from first responders; (2) transmission of x, y, z, locational data to first responders; (3) transmission of building and past incident information to first responders; (4) transmission of streaming video and pictures of incidents to first responders before their arrival on scene; (5) incident tracking of all first responders on scene; and (6) data and information which is only now in the conception stage. This type of future radio system needs to be flexible (hardware and software), yet be robust enough to have capacity to provide responders with the latest technology and without being limited by bandwidth.




>> Page 117 <<

6.3 PROS AND CONS CHART OF SYSTEM OPTIONS Table VI-1 OPTION 1 - Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system as the sole communications for the county

Item Pros Cons Infrastructure

Cost Maryland FiRST will provide infrastructure of tower, shelters, antennas, and generators.

Infrastructure is not rated at 120 mph wind loads, requiring additional upgrade or risk of tower failure.

Sustainability Maryland FiRST is providing 4 prime sites across the state.

Infrastructure is not rated at 120 mph wind loads, requiring additional upgrade or risk of tower failure, shelters, and generators also exposed.

Future Maryland FiRST will be responsible for continued upgrade of the infrastructure.

Expect the new Control Board to pass costs of maintenance onto users, particularly counties for costs in their own county.

Control

Maintenance Maryland FiRST will be responsible for maintenance of the towers, shelters, antennas, and cables.

Expect the new Control Board to pass costs of maintenance onto users, particularly counties for costs in their own county.

Redundancy MIEMSS is primary redundancy with fiber at some of the site, but not all.

MIEMSS currently provides county backhaul, state site do not have full redundancy.

Equipment

Mobiles N/A

Maryland FiRST is providing no mobiles for county use on the system; expected cost of $2.6 million. Cost is the same for all options.

Portables N/A

Maryland FiRST is providing no portables for county use on the system; expected cost of $6.6 million. Cost is the same for all options.

Consoles N/A

Maryland FiRST will require software changes every two years under their SUA with Motorola; county responsible for costs.

Software N/A

Maryland FiRST will require software upgrade every 2 years to future consoles; county responsible for costs.

Furniture N/A No new furniture expected.

Logging Recorders N/A

County will be required to upgrade and match recorders, which will be compatible with the software of Maryland FiRST.

MDTs N/A

County will be required to provide software and hardware for use of MDTs.




>> Page 118 <<

Item Pros Cons

Future Wicomico County may be able to negotiate to have Maryland FiRST provide some equipment.

County will be required to upgrade any equipment to match the Maryland FiRST system.

Operations

Encryption

Maryland FiRST not providing encryption for local users; Wicomico County can program one channel for encryption.

Wicomico County can program one channel for its own encryption; cost of encryption and radios to be borne by county.

Paging N/A

Paging system will not operate on the Maryland FiRST system. Wicomico County will be required to maintain separate system, including all costs of infrastructure and upgrade.

Prime Site Maryland FiRST has prime site for Wicomico County use; cost savings of $1.3 million.

Savings of $1.3 million from use of the state prime site. Prime site is also redundant in the Maryland FiRST system.

Dispatch State will dispatch for its own

agencies, no plans for dispatch.

County is responsible for dispatch operations and all costs, including policy and procedures.

Cross patching

Maryland FiRST system provides for interoperability, patching, and cross-patching to other systems.

County will be required to match Maryland FiRST system for patching and cross-patching at the dispatch to use Maryland FiRST system.

Capacity

Maryland FiRST system has sufficient capacity on system to ensure all existing TG and use can be accommodated.

No real channel plan until county commits to system and grade of service completed.

Channels

Maryland FiRST system has sufficient capacity on system to ensure all existing TG and use can be accommodated.

No real channel plan until county commits to system and grade of service is completed.

Talkgroups

Maryland FiRST system has sufficient capacity on system to ensure that all existing TG and use can be accommodated.


Expansion

Maryland FiRST has excess capacity on system for future use; expectation is that FCC will allocate additional frequencies, if needed, through FirstNet.

Future is contingent upon Maryland FiRST, the RPC, and FirstNet.

FCC Licenses Maryland FiRST would be responsible for all FCC regulations and renewal.

Maryland FiRST controls the licenses and is required to make changes to operations as directed by the FCC (i.e., future narrowbanding) without regard to costs to county.




>> Page 119 <<

Item Pros Cons

Mutual-aid

Maryland FiRST has statewide mutual-aid channels, as well as ISSI connections to Delaware.

Maryland FiRST ISSI plan does not include the level of mutual-aid that county provides to Delaware, likely requiring additional channels from Maryland FiRST.

Governance

State

Maryland FiRST is a state agency, which will fall within the executive branch budget and control. Governor has all appointment power to the Control Board.

Maryland FiRST is a state agency, which will fall within the executive branch budget and control. Governor has all appointment power to the Control Board, leaving no insurance of representation by Wicomico County on the Control Board.

Local No local governance, recommendations to the Control Board from MACO and MML.

No local governance, recommendations to the Control Board from MACO and MML.

Future Possible change in membership with change in governor, must go through the General Assembly.

Possible change in membership with change in governor, must go through the General Assembly.

Coverage

On-street

Maryland FiRST represents that on-street coverage is good. System has been in use less than 45 days, so no objective or subjective data on coverage.

System has been guaranteed by Motorola for 95% coverage at 95% reliability. Small areas of rural potion of the county are not covered.

Low-density

Maryland FiRST represents that low-density in-building coverage is better than expected. System has been in use less than 45 days, so no objective or subjective data on coverage.

System has been NOT been guaranteed by Motorola for any in-building coverage, areas of the county are not covered.

Medium-density

Maryland FiRST represents that medium-density in-building coverage is better than expected. System has been in use less than 45 days, so no objective or subjective data on coverage.

System has been NOT been guaranteed by Motorola for any in building coverage, areas of the county are not covered.

High-density

Maryland FiRST represents that high-density in-building coverage is better than expected. System has been in use less than 45 days, so no objective or subjective data on coverage.

System has been NOT been guaranteed by Motorola for any in-building coverage, areas of the county are not covered.

Statewide

Maryland FiRST system scheduled to provide statewide communications seamless from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Maryland FiRST system only covers half of the state; system still has Phase 3, Phase 4, and Phase 5, with over $91 million yet to be appropriated for costs of system.




>> Page 120 <<

Item Pros Cons

Interoperability

Maryland FiRST system is P25 Phase II compatible with interoperability will all of the existing systems in operation in the state.

Maryland FiRST system is not interoperable with existing paging system used in county.




>> Page 121 <<

Table VI-2 OPTION 2 - Utilizing the existing Maryland FiRST system and augmenting the system with one (1) new tower site

Item Pros Cons Infrastructure

Cost Maryland FiRST supportive of having Wicomico County add to Maryland FiRST infrastructure.

Wicomico County would spend an estimated $3.7 million to augment and upgrade the Maryland FiRST system to provide sufficient coverage and redundancy.

Sustainability Maryland FiRST supportive of having Wicomico County add to Maryland FiRST infrastructure.

Wicomico County would spend $3.7 million to augment and upgrade the Maryland FiRST and MEIMSS towers.

Future

Maryland FiRST would maintain their portions of the system, including MIEMSS backhaul; fiber connections maintained by state.

Wicomico County would be required to negotiate with Maryland FiRST on the maintenance costs of the upgrade; county may be responsible for maintenance costs.

Control Maryland FiRST controls their infrastructure.

Wicomico County would be required to either negotiate the transfer of the infrastructure to the state or maintain the infrastructure.

Maintenance

Maryland FiRST would maintain their portions of the system, including MIEMSS backhaul; fiber connections maintained by state.

Wicomico County would be required to negotiate with Maryland FiRST on the maintenance costs of the upgrade, county may be responsible for maintenance costs.

Redundancy Maryland FiRST supportive of having Wicomico County add to Maryland FiRST infrastructure.

Wicomico County would spend $540,000 to augment and upgrade the Maryland FiRST system.

Equipment

Mobiles N/A


Portables N/A


Consoles N/A

Maryland FiRST will require changes to future software every 2 years, county is responsible for costs – may require modifications to consoles, county responsible for costs.

Software N/A Maryland FiRST will require changes to future software every 2 years, county is responsible for costs.

Furniture N/A No new furniture expected.

Logging recorders N/A County will be required to upgrade and match logging recorders for compatibility with the software of Maryland FiRST.




>> Page 122 <<

Item Pros Cons

MDTs N/A County will be required to provide software and hardware for use of MDTs.

Future Wicomico County may be able to negotiate to have Maryland FiRST provide some equipment.

County will be required to upgrade any equipment to match the Maryland FiRST system, as well as upgrade their own portion of the system.

Operations

Encryption

Maryland FiRST not providing encryption for local users, Wicomico County can program one channel for encryption,

Wicomico County can program one channel for its own encryption, cost of encryption and radios to be borne by county

Paging N/A

Paging system will not operate on the Maryland FiRST system. County will be required to maintain separate system, including all costs of infrastructure and upgrade.

Prime site County would rebuild and control its own prime site.

County addition of its own prime site would cost the county an additional $1.3 million.

Dispatch State will dispatch for its own agencies, no plans for dispatch.

County is responsible for dispatch operations and all costs, including policy and procedures.

Cross-patching Maryland FiRST system provides for interoperability, patching, and cross-patching to other systems.

County will be required to match Maryland FiRST system for patching and cross-patching at the dispatch to use Maryland FiRST system.

Capacity

Channels Maryland FiRST system has sufficient capacity on system to ensure all existing TG and use can be accommodated.


Talkgroups

Maryland FiRST system has sufficient capacity on system to ensure that all existing TG and use can be accommodated.


Expansion

Maryland FiRST has excess capacity on system for future use; expectation is that FCC will allocate additional frequencies if needed through FirstNet.

Future is contingent upon Maryland FiRST, the RPC, and FirstNet.

FCC licenses Maryland FiRST controls the FCC applications for the system. Future is contingent upon Maryland

FiRST, the RPC, and FirstNet. Mutual-aid No impact. No impact. Governance

State

Maryland FiRST is a state agency, which will fall within the executive branch budget and control. Governor has all appointment power to the Control

Maryland FiRST is a state agency, which will fall within the executive branch budget and control. Governor has all appointment power to the Control




>> Page 123 <<

Item Pros Cons Board. Board, leaving no insurance of

representation by Wicomico County on the Control Board.

Local No local governance, recommendations to the Control Board From MACO, and MML.

No local governance, recommendations to the Control Board From MACO, and MML.

Future Possible change in membership with change in governor, legislation change must go through the General Assembly.

Possible change in membership with change in governor, legislation change must go through the General Assembly.

Coverage

On-street

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that on street coverage is comprehensive, may be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage.

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that on-street coverage is comprehensive.

Low-density

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that low-density in-building coverage is comprehensive, may be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage.

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that low-density in-building coverage is comprehensive with a cost of $3.7 million.

Medium-density

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that medium-density in-building coverage is comprehensive, may be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage.

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that medium-density in-building coverage is comprehensive with a cost of $3.7 million.

High-density

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that high-density in-building coverage is comprehensive, may be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage.

Wicomico County augmentation will ensure that high-density in-building coverage is comprehensive.

Statewide Maryland FiRST system scheduled to provide statewide communications seamless from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Wicomico County will be able to access and use the Maryland FiRST system outside of the area without change of channels.

Interoperability

Maryland FiRST system is P25 Phase II compatible with interoperability with all of the existing systems in operation in the state.

Maryland FiRST has installed an ISSI system with all State of Delaware Police for interoperability. System does not include local specific channels.




>> Page 124 <<

Table VI-3 OPTION 3 - Development of a new standalone P25 Phase II compliant 800 MHz digital system with an Intra RF Subsystem Interface (ISSI) for interoperability

Item Pros compared to Option 2 Cons Compared to Option 2 Infrastructure

Cost Phase-in and decisions within the control of the county.

Use of its own towers and no state towers costs the county approximately $6.5 million in added infrastructure.

Sustainability County can determine what level to strengthen the system.

Cost shift of approximately $6.5 million for additional towers and upgrade of towers the responsibility of the county.

Future County can determine what changes are needed in the future and has control of budget and timing.


Control System and control entirely within control of the county.

Control and responsibility of tower and FCC requirements are responsibility of the county.

Maintenance System and control entirely within control of the county.

Control and responsibility of tower and FCC requirements are responsibility of the county.

Redundancy System design and upgrade of redundancy can be phased in at option of the county.


Equipment

Mobiles County controls the type, and distribution of units and their policy.


Portables County controls the type, and distribution of units and their policy.


Consoles Consoles and their programming are within control of the county, not requiring upgrade every 2 years.

Maryland FiRST not providing any consoles; costs would be the same with any option.

Software

County controls the type and distribution of units, and their policy not requiring upgrade every 2 years under Maryland FiRST.

Maryland FiRST not providing any software; costs would be the same with any option

Furniture No new furniture expected. Maryland FiRST not providing any furniture; costs would be the same with any option.

Logging recorders

County can control the type of recorders and upgrade when county decides.

Maryland FiRST not providing any recorders; costs would be the same with any option.

MDTs County could place the existing MDTs into service.

County will be required to provide software and hardware for use of MDTs.




>> Page 125 <<

Item Pros compared to Option 2 Cons Compared to Option 2

Future

County is in control and still has access to the state procurement, allowing access to selected equipment at reduced prices.

County will be required to upgrade any equipment to match the Maryland FiRST system.

Operations

Encryption County has control over which channel and number of units that are encrypted.

Wicomico County would be required to dedicate the 700 MHz channel to encryption.

Paging County the ability to maintain and control use of the paging system. N/A

Prime site County has control over the prime site. County has a cost of $1.3 million for

the prime site.

Dispatch County has control over all dispatch functions. N/A

Cross-patching County has control over all patching and cross-patching policies. N/A

Capacity

Channels Have sufficient channels for current operation.

Limited number of channels in 800 MHz band, unlikely sufficient channels to implement NG911 features – no use of Maryland FiRST 700 MHz capacity.

Talkgroups County has control over its use of channels; new portable have larger talkgroup potential.

Limited number of channels in 800 MHz band, unlikely sufficient channels to implement NG911 features – no use of Maryland FiRST 700 MHz capacity.

Expansion County has control over its use of channels.

County may be limited to existing channels, as 800 MHz channels may not become available from additional rebanding – no use of Maryland FiRST 700 MHz capacity.

FCC licenses County has control over its 800 MHz channels and the licenses with the FCC.

County has control and also has limitation of channels based upon use.

Mutual-aid

Would have control over all interoperability pathways – can select the ISSI or use rebanded channels with State of Delaware.

Should State of Delaware adopt 700 MHz channels, or other interoperability partners, required to use an ISSI installed by another entity.

Governance

State Wicomico County has complete control over the system. N/A

Local Wicomico County has complete control over the system. N/A

Future Wicomico County has complete control over the system. N/A




>> Page 126 <<

Item Pros compared to Option 2 Cons Compared to Option 2 Coverage

On-street County has control of the level and strength of system; will be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage.

County bears cost of new system, including towers.

Low-density

County has control of the level and strength of system; will be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage; county able to determine cost against BDAs.


Medium-density

County has control of the level and strength of system; will be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage; county able to determine costs against BDAs.


High-density

County has control of the level and strength of system, will be able to get new vendor to guarantee coverage; county able to determine costs against BDAs.


Statewide

County will have access to Maryland FiRST system for use statewide through state ISSI for 800 MHz system.

N/A

Interoperability County will have control of interoperability, including their paging system.

State of Delaware has agreed to an ISSI with the Maryland FiRST system; may impact interoperability with county responders depending upon how the ISSI is set up with the Maryland FiRST system.




>> Page 127 <<

Table VI-4 Option 4 - Development of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system Item Pros compared to Option 3 Cons compared to Option 3

Infrastructure

Cost There is no difference in cost of infrastructure between Option 3 and Option 4.

There is no difference in cost of infrastructure between Option 3 and Option 4.

Sustainability There is not difference in sustainability between Option 3 and Option 4.

There is not difference in sustainability between Option 3 and Option 4.

Future Wicomico County controls the future of its infrastructure for both Option 3 and Option 4.

Wicomico County controls the future of its infrastructure for both Option 3 and Option 4.

Control Wicomico County has control of operations of its system.

Wicomico County has control of operations of its system, but is also subject to the impact and control of Maryland FiRST.

Maintenance Wicomico County will have control and full responsibility of maintenance costs.

Wicomico County may be providing maintenance costs for state owned facilities.

Redundancy Wicomico County has full redundancy in the system and has improved the Maryland FiRST system.

NA

Equipment

Mobiles There is no difference in cost of mobile radios between Option 3 and Option 4.

NA

Portables There is no difference in cost of portable radios between Option 3 and Option 4.

NA

Consoles There is no difference in cost of consoles between Option 3 and Option 4.

NA

Software Wicomico County will have access to the new software every two years for its 700 MHz channels.

Wicomico County will be required to upgrade their software, as it relates to the 700 MHz system, every two years at its expense.

Furniture There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between

Option 3 and Option 4. Logging recorders There is no difference between

Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4.

MDTs Wicomico County can dedicate a channel to the operation of MDTs and utilize the existing equipment.

NA

Future Wicomico County will have control over the system and its future with expanded capacity.

Wicomico County will have to continue to deal with the Control Board and monitor its decisions.

Operations

Encryption There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between

Option 3 and Option 4.




>> Page 128 <<

Item Pros compared to Option 3 Cons compared to Option 3

Paging There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between


Prime site There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between


Dispatch There is no difference between Option 3 and Option 4. There is no difference between


Cross-patching County has control over all patching and cross-patching policies. N/A

Capacity

Channels

Wicomico County has access to additional channels and can utilize those channels for additional data services.

Wicomico County will be required to provide grade of service for channels and to utilize those channels.

Talkgroups

Wicomico County has access to additional channels and more talkgroups and can utilize those channels for additional data services.


Expansion

Wicomico County has access to additional channels and can utilize those channels for additional data services.


FCC licenses

Wicomico County will have to cooperate with Maryland FiRST on FCC license issues for channels and microwave.

Wicomico County will have to cooperate with Maryland FiRST on FCC license issues for channels and microwave.

Mutual-aid Wicomico County will have its own ISSI interface to work with all of its interoperability partners.

Wicomico County will have access to the ISSI from the State of Maryland.

Governance

State Wicomico County will have to work with the Control Board may be able to negotiated elements of system.

Wicomico County will have to work with the Control Board on its 700 MHz channels.

Local Wicomico County will have control over its 800 MHz system with little interference from the Control Board.

Wicomico County will have to work with the Control Board on its 700 MHz channels.

Future N/A Control Board is a new entity, unknown impact on local users in the future.

Coverage

On-street The vendor will be required to guarantee 98% coverage with 98% reliability in new system.

N/A

Low-density The vendor will be required to guarantee 98% coverage with 98% reliability in new system.

N/A




>> Page 129 <<

Item Pros compared to Option 3 Cons compared to Option 3

Medium-density The vendor will be required to guarantee 98% coverage with 98% reliability in new system.

N/A

High-density The vendor will be required to guarantee 98% coverage with 98% reliability in new system.

N/A

Statewide Wicomico County will not have to rely upon the ISSI interface of Maryland FiRST for work with other partners.

N/A

Interoperability

Wicomico County will not have to rely upon the ISSI interface of Maryland FiRST for work with other partners.

N/A




>> Page 130 <<

6.4 COST COMPARISON ANALYSIS

The differences in cost are noted in the table below:

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Estimated Turnkey Cost $8,015,686 $14,852,286 $20,111,686 $20,111,686Potential Turnkey Cost $8,015,686 $14,852,286 $16,111,686 $16,111,686

It is the policy of Concepts To Operations to recommend a competitive bid process to our clients. While use of existing previously negotiated contracts or master supply contracts with the state can provide some benefit, it has been CTO’s experience that competitively bidding the radio system can result in a cost savings of 20% overall for the system. This process could result in a cost savings of more than $4 million on the overall project. Unique to the utilization of the P25 foundation of a new radio system is the requirement that all of the different components have been certified to work within other vendors systems (i.e., radios from one vendor will function on a system purchased from another vendor). During the RFP process, CTO believes that Wicomico County may be in the posture to seek independent bids for different components such as:

Towers and installation Microwave Radio system Mobiles Portables Interfaces

Concepts To Operations also believes that, while the project may be much more difficult to manage with multiple independent vendors, it will likely result in companies which are located within Wicomico County to bid on and secure contracts directly with the county rather than have one of the major vendors utilize local companies as subcontractors. 6.5 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Based upon the analysis outlined in the report, Concepts To Operations has evaluated four (4) options for the county on solving the future public safety radio communication needs of the county:

Maryland FiRST Maryland FiRST augmented New 800 MHz standalone system New 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system

While cost of the system is certainly a substantial factor, given that all of the funds allocated to this decision will be from the taxpayers of Wicomico County, it is not the sole factor. Concepts To Operations has evaluated the systems on the following:

On-street coverage In-building coverage




>> Page 131 <<

Capital costs Operational costs Sustainability of county system in major weather events Sustainability of state system in major weather events Scalability of system over the next 20 years Control of the future direction of communications for the county Interoperability with state agencies Interoperability with Eastern Shore and other interoperability partners Ability for City of Salisbury and Salisbury University to operate on the system in the

future Option 4 – 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital radio system. This alternative was selected for the following key reasons:

The hybrid system provides Wicomico County options to expand its limited channel capacity utilizing either 700 MHz channels or 800 MHz channels.

The hybrid system utilizes the ISSI functions of the Maryland FiRST system for continued interoperability functions with the State of Delaware.

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to harden its infrastructure to ANSI/TIA 222 Rev. G standards to sustain winds loads over 120 mph.

The hybrid system allows the county to maintain full control over the operations and upgrades of its system.

The hybrid system allows Wicomico County to maintain its paging system and to control its future use.

The hybrid system allows the county to develop and maintain a robust in-building communication system which will be guaranteed to provide a 3.4 DAQ or greater across all types of building structures in the county with 97% coverage/97% reliability.

The hybrid system will allow for the creation of a fully redundant backhaul system with the installation of an additional seventeen (17) miles of fiber optic cables and ten (10) new microwave links.

The hybrid system will allow the county to control expansion of the communications system and operations of non-emergency communications, including other county agencies currently not on the system.

One of the significant expenditures that the county would face in implementation of this project is the cost of property acquisition for placement of a tower to be used in the new system. CTO believes that leveraging county owned property, such as the public safety complex or property that is owned by the State of Maryland (SHA, DNR, or MSP), Wicomico County Board of Education, and/or Wicomico County Department of Recreation, Parks & Tourism, would reduce overall system costs. The RFP and any vendor design should mandate the use of public facilities for the location of tower infrastructure. Concepts To Operations, in its professional opinion and based upon all factors considered during this review, recommends the adoption of Option 4, the creation of a 700/800 MHz hybrid P25 Phase II digital public safety radio communications system.




>> Page 132 <<

6.6 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDAITONS

While outside of the scope of this RFP, Concepts To Operations has had the opportunity to evaluate other issues for Wicomico County consideration including:

Upgrade to NENA i3 architecture for movement to IP-based voice for county operations Construction of a radio shop sufficient for maintaining county system Consider relocation of the PSAP and back-up PSAP at detention facility Consider regional cooperation concerning communications plans and NG911

implementation Review training of staff and personnel on existing and new systems Work with commercial carriers and tower companies for tower construction and rental

income to offset costs of towers

E

EXIS

AP

STININ

PPE

NGNVE

END

EQUNTO

DIX A

UIPORY

A

MENY

NT

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico County Emergency Servc

# User Alias WICO ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES Ser# Model TYPE1 WCES MC1-HT1 706500 736500 763024 722704 755123 721CFG2011 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII2 WCES MC1-HT2 706501 736501 763025 722705 755124 721CFG2012 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII3 WCES MC1-HT3 706502 736502 763026 722706 755125 721CFG2013 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII4 WCES MC1-HT4 706503 736503 763027 722707 755126 721CFG2014 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII5 WCES MC1-HT5 706504 736504 763028 722708 755127 721CFG2015 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII6 WCES MC1-HT6 706505 736505 763029 722709 755128 721CFG2016 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII7 WCES LOST 706506 736506 763030 722710 755129 721CFG2017 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII8 WCES MC1-HT8 706507 736507 763031 722711 755130 721CFG2018 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII9 WCES MC1-HT9 706508 736508 763032 722712 755131 721CFG2019 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII10 WCES MC1-HT10 706509 736509 763033 722713 755132 721CFG2020 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII11 WCES MC1-HT11 706510 736510 763034 722714 755133 721CFG2021 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII12 WCES MC1-HT12 706511 736511 763035 722715 755134 721CFG2022 H18UCF9PW6AN XTS5K PMIII13 Teltronic BRIAN 706512 736512 326AYW1716 H09UCH9PW7BN XTS3K PMII14 Teltronic OLD Blankenship 706513 73651315 WCES DST 1 (TAMMY) 706514 736514 466AUA0869 H01UCH6PW1BN MTS2000 PMIII16 WCES 911-HT1 706515 736515 721CKX2520 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII17 WCES 911-HT2 706516 736516 721CKX2521 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII18 WCES PT-1 706517 736517 763540 722734 755199 500CGR1460 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000 0519 WCES CEI 60 706518 736518 763010 722145 755152 700/800/VHF APX700020 WCES 911-HT3 706519 736519 721CFA2526 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMIII21 WCES CTO-1 706520 736520 466AZE5623 MTS2000 PMI 22 WCES Reserved 706521 736521 763148 722719 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII23 WCES PT-1 HT2 706522 736522 763069 722718 755193 721CGZ1123 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII24 WCES COMMS SPARE 1 706523 736523 Radio 722AAG0795 M01UJM6PW6AN MTS2000 PMII25 WCES COMMS SPARE 2 706524 736524 Radio 722AAA1320 M01UJM6PW6AN MTS2000 PMII26 WCES COMMS SPARE 4 706526 736526 Radio 722AZL0169 M01UJM6PW6AN MTS2000 PMII27 Teltronic Dave Souder HT1 706527 73652728 Teltronic Dave Souder HT2 706528 73652829 WCES EM 6 706534 736534 721CKF0862 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII30 WCES EM 7 706535 736535 721CKF0863 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII31 WCES EM 8 706536 736536 721CKF0864 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII32 WCES EM 9 706537 736537 721CKF0865 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII33 WCES EM 10 706538 736538 721CKF0866 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII34 WCES EM 11 706803 736803 466AAU1882 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI35 WCES EM 12 706529 736529 466AZE5624 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI36 WCES EM 13 706530 736530 721CJK3767 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII37 WCES EM 14 706531 736531 466ABW5928 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI38 WCES EM 15 706532 736532 721CJK3769 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMII

1 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico County Emergency Servc

# User Alias WICO ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES Ser# Model TYPE39 WCES EM 16 706533 736533 721CHP0663 H18UCH9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS 5000 PMIII40 WCES EM 17 706038 736038 466AZL0599 M01UJM6PW6AN MTS2000 PMIII41 WCES EM 18 706039 736039 466CEC0357 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI42 WCES EM 19 706040 736040 466AAU3492 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI43 WCES EM 20 706812 736812 466CEC0356 H01UCD6PW1BN MTS2000 PMI# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL Type WCES EM1 HT4 704414 734414 466AAE4731 HO1UCF6PW1BN MTS2000 PMII

Note: Additional Radios For

Wicomico County Emergency

Services are listed under the

WCDC,911-Admin,…etc tab.

2 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomcio County Fire Portables

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN24 STA 74 74-19 "MANSON JONES" 702448 732448 743370 742517 721CHK163825 STA 74 CHAPLAIN 74 702449 732449 743371 326AYS257326 STA 74 A74 HT1 702450 732450 743991 326AAA208327 STA 74 74-17 702451 732451 743992 742520 326AAA207728 STA 74 74-18 702452 732452 743993 742521 326AAA206729 STA 74 74-19 702453 732453 744039 326AAN452630 STA 74 74-20 702454 732454 744040 326AAN452731 STA 74 7439A/ RUSSELL MUMFOR 703133 733133 763132 687THS149932 STA 74 OLD 74-36 702455 732455 744041 326AAN452833 STA 74 OLD 74-37 702456 732456 744042 326AAN452934 STA 74 OLD 74-38 702457 732457 744043 326AAN4530

3 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomcio County Fire Portables

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN35 STA 74 OLD 74-39 702458 732458 744044 326AAN4531# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN36 STA 74 TRUCK 74 HT6 702459 732459 744045 326AAN453237 STA 74 74-40 702460 732460 744046 742512 326AAN453338 STA 74 74-1C 702461 732461 744047 326AAN453439 STA 74 Res74C 702462 732462 744048 326AAN453540 STA 74 TKR 74-5 702463 732463 326CEA186741 STA 74 7422 702464 732464 326CEA186842 STA 74 74-24 702465 732465 744107 742521 326CEC101143 STA 74 74-2C 702466 732466 326CEC101244 STA 74 74-4 702467 732467 744174 721CEC159045 STA 74 74-3 ENGINEER 702468 732468 744175 721CEC159246 STA 74 74-2 HT6 702469 732469 744176 721CEC159747 STA 74 DEPUTY 74 702470 732470 744177 721CEC159848 STA 74 74-3-1 702471 732471 744298 721CFZ412549 STA 74 74-3-2 702472 732472 744299 721CFZ412650 STA 74 74-3-3 702473 732473 744300 721CFZ412751 STA 74 74-2CF 702474 732474 744405 721CHZ537252 STA 74 74-2E 702475 732475 744406 721CHZ537353 STA 74 TK 74 C 702476 732476 744407 721CGZ112054 STA 74 OLD 74-16 702477 732477 744408 755147 721CKR172654 STA 74 702477 732477 744408 721CGZ112255 STA 74 TK 74 E 702478 732478 744409 721CGZ112456 STA 74 74-20 "NICK BOND" 702479 732479 743371 742518 721CHP0695

4 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Fire Police V1

# USER NAME ALIAS WIC UID SBY UID DELID DORID UMDES SN MODEL TYPE1 STA. 3 ERNIE POPE 330 702340 732340 763140 687THW0313 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15002 STA. 3 BURTON GORDY 331 702341 732341 763141 687THW0314 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15003 STA. 3 WALTER PETTERMAN 333 702343 732343 763090 687THW0317 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15004 STA. 3 315 315 702344 732344 763091 687THW0318 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15005 STA. 3 AUBREY PUSEY 336 702345 732345 763092 687THW0319 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15006 STA. 3 PAUL REVEL 337 702346 732346 763093 687THW0320 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15007 STA. 3 BRYAN SMITH 339A 702348 732348 763095 687THW0325 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15008 STA. 3 DALE WILLIAMS 339C 702349 732349 763096 687THS1454 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS15009 STA. 3 VERNON PAYNE 339B 702356 732356 763135 687CJH0804 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

STA. 3 DONALD FIELDS 334 702738 723728 763112 687THS1480 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500STA. 3 JACK HEATH 338 703049 733049 763128 687CJH0794 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

10 STA. 5 STEVE HOLLAWAY 530 702555 732555 763097 687CJH0778 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150011 STA. 5 CHARLES SMITH 531 702556 732556 763098 687CJH0779 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150012 STA. 5 BILL MILES 532 702557 732557 763099 687CJH0780 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150013 STA. 5 WAYNE WHITE 533 702558 732558 763100 687CJH0781 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150014 STA. 6 VANCE WEBSTER 630 702656 732656 763101 687CJH0782 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150015 STA. 6 VIC PIZZILA 631 702657 732657 763102 687CJH0783 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150016 STA. 6 BILL WHITE 632 702658 732658 763103 687CJH0784 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150017 STA. 6 BURT BUNTING 633 702659 732659 763104 687CJH0785 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150018 STA. 6 HOLLY AGNEW 634 702660 732660 763105 687CJH0786 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150019 STA. 6 WARREN OWENS 635 702661 732661 763106 687CJH0787 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150020 STA. 6 CHARLES MASSEY 636 702662 732662 763107 687CJH0788 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150021 STA. 6 GUY BANKS 637 702663 732663 736156 687CJH0805 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150022 STA.6 CHUCK BRATTEN 638 702842 732842 763119 687THS1487 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

STA.3 KEN MAYO 639 702744 732744 763315 687THS1483 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150023 STA. 7 BILL WILKINS SR 730 702735 732735 763109 687THS1455 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150024 STA. 7 JOSHUA FARLOW 731 702736 732736 763110 687THS1456 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150025 STA. 7 GEORGE WHITE JR 733 702737 732737 763111 687THS1479 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150027 STA. 7 BILL BAKER 735 702739 732739 763113 687THS1481 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150029 STA. 7 EDDIE COOPER 738 702742 732742 763116 687THS1484 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150030 STA. 7 GENE PEAVLEY 732 702753 732753 763150 687CJH0789 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150031 STA. 7 PAULA CHAPMAN 736 702754 732754 763151 687CJH0790 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150032 STA. 7 ROBERT PARSONS JR 734A 702755 732755 763152 687CJH0791 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150033 STA.8 HERBERT HARMON 830 702837 732837 763117 687THS1485 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150034 STA.8 WALT BRATTEN 831 702838 732838 763118 687THS1486 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150035 STA.8 JAMES PARKER 835 702843 732843 763120 687THS1488 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150036 STA.8 DEAN BRITTINGHAM 836 702844 732844 763121 687THS1489 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

5 of 51


# USER NAME ALIAS WIC UID SBY UID DELID DORID UMDES SN MODEL TYPE37 STA.8 RANDY WHITE 837 702845 732845 763122 687THS1490 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150038 STA.8 JOHN MARCH 839 702846 732846 763123 687THS1491 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

6 of 51


# USER NAME ALIAS WIC UID SBY UID DELID DORID UMDES SN MODEL TYPE# USER NAME ALIAS WIC UID SBY UID DELID DORID UMDES SN MODEL TYPE39 STA.9 ADOLPHUS HOOPER 930 702933 732933 763124 687THS1494 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150040 STA.9 DAVID BENDER 931 702947 732947 763158 687CJH0807 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150041 STA.9 JAKIE MADDOX 932 702342 732342 763089 687THW0316 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150042 STA.9 EDWARD ROBINSON 933 702948 732948 763161 687CJH0810 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150043 STA.11 WALTER BRATTEN 1131 703048 733048 763127 687CJH0793 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150045 STA.12 AUTHUR LITTLE 1230 703130 733130 763129 687THS1496 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150046 STA.12 IRMIN KAMM 1231 703131 733131 763130 687THS1497 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150047 STA.12 JOHN MATTHEWS 1232 703132 733132 763131 687THS1498 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150048 STA.12 RAY LEWIS 1234 703266 733266 763138 687CJH0800 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150049 STA.12 CHARLOTTE PITTMAN 1233 703149 733149 763194 687CMK4495 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150050 STA.12 WALTER BORYS 1235 703150 733150 763195 687CMK4496 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150051 STA.14 ISSAC WHITE 1430 703261 733261 763133 687CJH0795 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150052 STA.14 AUTHOR WILLING 1431 703262 733262 763134 687CJH0796 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150053 STA.14 HERMAN ENGLISH 1432 703263 733263 763135 687CJH0797 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150054 STA.14 SANDRA WHITE 1433 703264 733264 763136 687CJH0798 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150055 STA.14 ROBERT ADKINS 1434 703265 733265 763137 687CJH0799 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150056 STA.14 GEORGE WHITE 1435 703047 733047 763126 687CJH0792 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150057 STA.14 WENDU HAZANJI 1436 703267 733267 763139 687CMT1645 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150058 STA.14 LINDA LANBROSE 1437 703268 733268 687CJH0809 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150059 STA.14 JACK BENNETT 1438 702740 732740 763114 687THS1482 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150060 STA.15 BURT WIDDOWSON 1530 703343 733343 763108 687CJH0777 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150061 STA.15 CHARLES WAYCICHOWSKI1531 703344 733344 763162 687CJH0811 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150062 STA.15 JAKE MALONE 1532 703345 733345 763163 687CJH0812 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150063 STA.15 ANDREW GUINTA 1533 703346 733346 763164 687CJH0813 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150064 STA.15 SAM BORANNOCK 1534 703347 733347 763165 687CJH0814 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150065 STA.15 JOE COSSABOOM 1535 703348 733348 763166 687CJH0806 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150066 STA.15 MATT RADCLIFF 1536 702935 732935 763125 687THS1495 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150067 STA.15 TIM DONALDS 1537 702487 732487 763159 687CJH0808 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150068 STA.15 DAVID BERRY 1538 702347 732347 763094 687THW0322 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150069 STA.15 1534 703347 733347 763165 687CJH0815 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150070 STA. 74 JOE TRIGLIA 7430 702481 732481 763153 687CJH0802 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150071 STA. 74 JOHN SMITH 7431 702482 732482 763154 687CJH0803 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150072 STA. 74 STEVE LYNCHFORD 7439 702490 732490 763166 687CJH0815 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150073 STA. 74 RUSSELL MUMFORD 7439A 703133 733133 763132 687THS1499 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150074 WCSD DENNIS TAYLOR DTAYLO 704302 732302 763205 687THS1616 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150075 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0787 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500

7 of 51


# USER NAME ALIAS WIC UID SBY UID DELID DORID UMDES SN MODEL TYPE76 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0788 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150077 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0789 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150078 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0790 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150079 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0791 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150080 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0792 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS150081 SPARE IN WAREHOUSE 687CMD0793 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500828384858687

8 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico County Fire Mobiles

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL Type12 STA 6 ENGINE 605 702613 732613 763628 722115 751550 656CMH0117 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05 DUAL HEAD13 STA 6 ENGINE 607 702614 732614 763629 722116 751551 656CMH0118 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05 DUAL HEAD14 STA 6 RES ENGINE 604 702615 732615 763630 722117 751552 656CMH0119 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05 DUAL HEAD15 STA 6 BRUSH 606 702616 732616 763631 722118 751553 656CMH0120 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05 DUAL HEAD16 STA 6 TANKER 608 702617 732617 763632 722119 751554 656CMH0121 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05 DUAL HEAD17 STA 6 UTILITY 6 702618 732618 763633 722120 751555 656CMH0122 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 0518 STA 6 A6 702619 732619 763634 722121 751556 656CMH0123 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 0519 STA 6 B6 702620 732620 763635 722122 751557 656CMH0124 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 0520 STA 6 TRAFFIC CONTROL 6 702621 732621 763636 722123 751558 656CMH0125 M30URS9PW1AN APX7500 7/800 05

9 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico County Police Mobiles

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE93 WCSD W2221 704091 734091 763502 722847 751510 527CMK0093 M25URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ APX 6500 REMOTE93 WCSD WCSD CAR 1 704092 734092 763505 722848 751511 527CMK0092 M25URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ APX 6500 REMOTE

10 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico County Police Portable

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE107 HUM ANML C1 MOBILE 704362 714362 763191 500CFX1741 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000108 HUM ANML C3 MOBILE 704363 714363 763192 500CHZ0993 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000109 HUM ANML C4 MOBILE 704364 714364 763193 500CGR1470 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000

11 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 State Highway Administration

# USER ASSIGNED ALIAS SHA ID WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID Serial # MODEL TYPE1 SHA SOC SOC OPERATIONS MANAGER SHA 9001 C064689 716350 746350 703504 715240 721CGF4173 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII2 SHA SOC SOC ASSISTANT MANAGER SHA 9002 C064693 716351 746351 703505 715241 721CGF4175 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII3 SHA SOC SOC ASSISTANT MANAGER SHA 9003 C064694 716352 746352 703506 715242 721CGF4176 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII4 SHA SOC SOC TEAM LEADER SHA 9300 C064691 716353 746353 703507 715243 721CGF4185 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII5 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9301 C064688 716354 746354 703508 715244 721CGF4190 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII6 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9302 C064696 716355 746355 703509 715245 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII7 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9303 C064695 716356 746356 703510 715246 721CGF4201 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII8 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9400 C064687 716357 746357 703511 715247 721CGF4202 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII9 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9401 C064690 716358 746358 703512 715248 721CGF4208 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII10 SHA SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9402 C064692 716359 746359 703513 715249 721CGF4211 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII11 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT ENGINEER SHA 1000 C067107 716360 746360 703514 715250 721CGT4304 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII12 SHA DIS 1 ASSISTANT DIS ENGINEER MAINT SHA 1001 C067109 716361 746361 703515 715251 721CGT4305 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII13 SHA DIS 1 ASSISTANT DIS ENGINEER TRAFFIC SHA 1003 C067108 716362 746362 703516 715252 721CGT4307 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII14 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT OPERATIONS ENGINEER SHA 1026 C067110 716363 746363 703517 715253 721CGT4308 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII15 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC DESK SHA D1EOC C067101 716364 746364 703518 715254 721CGT4313 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII16 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1900 C067103 716365 746365 703519 715255 721CGT4315 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII17 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1901 C067392 716366 746366 703520 715256 721CHM4342 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII18 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1902 C067390 716367 746367 703521 715257 721CHM4343 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII19 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1903 C067394 716368 746368 703522 715258 721CHM4344 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII20 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1904 C067391 716369 746369 703523 715259 721CHM4345 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII21 SHA DIS 1 DISTRICT EOC CACHE SHA 1905 C067389 716370 746370 703524 715260 721CHM4346 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII22 SHA SALSHOP RESIDENT MAINT ENGINEER SHA 1100 C067385 716371 746371 703525 715261 721CHM4347 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII23 SHA SALSHOP ASSISTANT MAINT ENGINEER SHA 1101 C067388 716372 746372 703526 715262 721CHM4348 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII24 SHA SALSHOP TEAM LEADER SHA 1105 C067386 716373 746373 703527 715263 721CHM4349 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII25 SHA SALSHOP TEAM LEADER SHA 1106 C067396 716374 746374 703528 715264 721CHM4350 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII26 SHA SALSHOP TEAM LEADER SHA 1107 C067384 716375 746375 703529 715265 721CHM4351 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII27 SHA SALSHOP TEAM LEADER SHA 1112 C067387 716376 746376 703530 715266 721CHM4352 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII28 SHA SALSHOP SHOP CHIEF SHA 1109 C067398 716377 746377 703531 715267 721CHM4353 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII29 SHA SALSHOP SHOP ADMIN/EOC SHA 1151 C067397 716378 746378 703532 715268 721CHM4355 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII30 SHA SALSHOP SHOP ADMIN/EOC SHA 1152 C067393 716379 746379 703533 715269 721CHM4358 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII31 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 5 C067093 716380 746380 703534 715270 721CGT4314 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII32 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 10 C067094 716381 746381 703535 715271 721CGT4353 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII33 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 7 C067095 716382 746382 703536 715272 721CGT4320 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII34 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 9 C067096 716383 746383 703537 715273 721CGT4356 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII35 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 6 C067097 716384 746384 703538 715274 721CGT4363 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII36 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 8 C067098 716385 746385 703539 715275 721CGT4317 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII37 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 4 C067099 716386 746386 703540 715276 721CGT4361 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII38 SHA CAMB SHOP SHA UNIT 3 C0670100 716387 746387 703541 715277 721CGT4360 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII39 SOC TOC-5 CENTER SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9500 C067092 716388 746388 703542 715278 721CGT4319 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII40 SOC TOC-5 CENTER SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9501 C067081 716389 746389 703543 715279 721CGT4351 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII41 SOC TOC-5 CENTER SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9502 C067082 716390 746390 703544 715280 721CGT4352 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII42 SOC TOC-5 CENTER SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9503 C067086 716391 746391 703545 715281 721CGT4358 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII43 SOC TOC-5 CENTER SOC EMERGENCY RESPONSE TECH SHA 9504 C067085 716392 746392 703546 715282 721CGT4362 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII# USER ASSIGNED ALIAS SHA ID WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID Serial # MODEL TYPE44 SHA SHA 009 SHA 009 716393 746393 466CCL1470 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII45 SHA SBY SHOP DESKTRAC SBY SHOP 716394 74639446 SHA BLANKENSHIP BLKNSHIP 716395 746395 721CGF4196 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII

1 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wico County Misc. Twr Radios

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID S/N MODEL TYPE1 911 MCS 2000-3 722AAA1330 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS 20002 911 MCS 2000-1 722ACA1347 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS 20003 911 MCS 2000-2 722ACA1348 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS 20004 911 800-TEST 623AZE0212 800 MHZ MCS 20005 911 VHF-TEST 623AZE0835 800 MHZ MCS 20006 911/SBY MARINE RD 722AAA1322 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS 20007 911 RF MODEM 722AZL0766 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS 20008 911 WOR LINK 706034 500CEE1062 800 MHZ XTL5000 W7

2 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Board of Ed Mobiles

# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 WCBOE 018469 BUS 5 721000 712000 775THA1701 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 2 WCBOE 018470 BUS 87 721001 712001 775THA1714 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 3 WCBOE 018471 BUS 74 721002 712002 775THA1715 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 4 WCBOE 018472 BUS 73 721003 712003 775THA1716 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 5 WCBOE 018473 BUS 12 721004 712004 775THA1717 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 6 WCBOE 018474 BUS 33 721005 712005 775THA1718 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 7 WCBOE 018475 BUS 40 721006 712006 775THA1719 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 8 WCBOE 018476 BUS 21 721007 712007 775THA1720 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 9 WCBOE 018477 BUS 458 721008 712008 775THA1721 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500

10 WCBOE 018478 BUS 476 721009 712009 775THA1722 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 11 WCBOE 018479 BUS 483 721010 712010 775THA1723 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 12 WCBOE 018480 BUS 14 721011 712011 775THA1724 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 13 WCBOE 018481 BUS 18 721012 712012 775THA1725 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 14 WCBOE 018482 BUS 26 721013 712013 775THA1726 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 15 WCBOE 018483 BUS 76 721014 712014 775THA1727 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 16 WCBOE 018484 BUS 75 721015 712015 775THA1728 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 17 WCBOE 018485 ADMIN 1 721016 712016 775THA1729 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 18 WCBOE 018486 BUS 504 (HL) 721017 712017 775THA1731 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 19 WCBOE 018487 BUS 96 721018 712018 775THA1732 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 20 WCBOE 018488 BUS 434 721019 712019 775THA1733 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 21 WCBOE 018489 BUS 107S-OOS 721020 712020 775THA1734 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 22 WCBOE 018490 BUS 53 721021 712021 775THA1735 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 23 WCBOE 018491 BUS 501 (HL) 721022 712022 775THA1736 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 24 WCBOE 018492 BUS 11 721023 712023 775THA1737 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 25 WCBOE 018493 BUS 16 721024 712024 775THA1738 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 26 WCBOE 018494 721025 712025 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 27 WCBOE 018495 BUS 136 721026 712026 775THA1740 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 28 WCBOE 018496 BUS 154 721027 712027 775THA1741 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 29 WCBOE 018497 BUS 65 721028 712028 775THA1742 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 30 WCBOE 018498 BUS 71 721029 712029 775THA1745 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 31 WCBOE 018499 BUS 16 721030 712030 775THA1746 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 32 WCBOE 018500 BUS 202 721031 712031 775THA1747 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 33 WCBOE 018501 BUS 500 (HL) 721032 712032 775THA1748 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 34 WCBOE 018502 BUS 4 721033 712033 775THA1749 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 35 WCBOE 018503 BUS 32 721034 712034 775THA1750 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 36 WCBOE 018504 BUS 127 721035 712035 775THA1751 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 37 WCBOE 018505 BUS 49 721036 712036 775THA1965 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 38 WCBOE 018506 BUS 121 721037 712037 775THA1966 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 39 WCBOE 018507 BUS 19 721038 712038 775THA1967 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 40 WCBOE 018508 BUS 107 721039 712039 775THC1624 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 41 WCBOE 018509 BUS 80 721040 712040 775THL3439 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 42 WCBOE 018510 BUS 475 721041 712041 775THC1626 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 43 WCBOE 018511 BUS 88 721042 712042 775THC1644 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500

3 of 51


# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE44 WCBOE 018512 BUS 8 721043 712043 775THE0793 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 45 WCBOE 018513 BUS 10 721044 712044 775THE2011 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 46 WCBOE 018514 BUS 15 721045 712045 775THE2012 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 47 WCBOE 018515 BUS 24 721046 712046 775THE2013 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 48 WCBOE 018516 BUS 25 721047 712047 775THE2014 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 49 WCBOE 018517 BUS 153 721048 712048 775THJ1357 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 50 WCBOE 018518 BUS 59 721049 712049 775THJ1358 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 51 WCBOE 018519 BUS 72 721050 712050 775THL3320 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 52 WCBOE 018520 ADMIN 2 721051 712051 775THL3321 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 53 WCBOE 018521 ADMIN 3 721052 712052 775THL3322 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 54 WCBOE 018522 ADMIN 4 721053 712053 775THL3323 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 55 WCBOE 018523 BUS 3 721054 712054 775THL3324 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 56 WCBOE 018524 BUS 66 721055 712055 775THL3325 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 57 WCBOE 018525 BUS 469 721056 712056 775THL3326 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 58 WCBOE 018526 BUS 351 721057 712057 775THL3327 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 59 WCBOE 018527 BUS 354 721058 712058 775THL3328 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 60 WCBOE 018528 BUS 2 721059 712059 775THL3329 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 61 WCBOE 018529 BUS 356 721060 712060 775THL3330 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 62 WCBOE 018530 BUS 556 (HL) 721061 712061 775THL3331 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 63 WCBOE 018531 BUS 557 (HL) 721062 712062 775THL3332 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 64 WCBOE 018532 BUS 558 (HL) 721063 712063 775THL3333 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 65 WCBOE 018533 BUS 57 721064 712064 775THL3337 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 66 WCBOE 018534 BUS 69 721065 712065 775THL3338 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 67 WCBOE 018535 BUS 86 721066 712066 775THA3339 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 68 WCBOE 018536 BUS 462 721067 712067 775THL3340 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 69 WCBOE 018537 BUS 29 721068 712068 775THL3341 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 70 WCBOE 018538 BUS 48 721069 712069 775THL3342 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 71 WCBOE 018539 BUS 7 721070 712070 775THL3354 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 72 WCBOE 018540 OLD BUS 22 OOS 721071 712071 775THL3356 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 73 WCBOE 018541 BUS 84 721072 712072 775THL3357 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 74 WCBOE 018542 BUS 13 721073 712073 775THL3358 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 75 WCBOE 018543 BUS 67 721074 712074 775THL3359 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 76 WCBOE 018544 BUS 82 721075 712075 775THL3360 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 77 WCBOE 018545 BUS 94 721076 712076 775THL3361 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 78 WCBOE 018546 BUS 44 721077 712077 775THL3362 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 79 WCBOE 018547 BUS 38 721078 712078 775THL3363 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500

4 of 51


# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE80 WCBOE 018548 OLD BUS 77 721079 712079 775THL3364 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 81 WCBOE 018549 BUS 89 721080 712080 775THL3365 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 82 WCBOE 018550 BUS 20 721081 712081 775THL3366 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 83 WCBOE 018551 BUS 517 (HL) 721082 712082 775THL3367 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 84 WCBOE 018552 BUS 116 721083 712083 775THA1739 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 85 WCBOE 018553 BUS 285 721084 712084 775THL3369 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 86 WCBOE 018554 BUS 17 721085 712085 775THL3370 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 87 WCBOE 018555 BUS 46 721086 712086 775THL3371 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 88 WCBOE 018556 BUS 62 721087 712087 775THL3372 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 89 WCBOE 018557 BUS 505 721088 712088 775THL3373 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 90 WCBOE 018558 BUS 43 721089 712089 775THL3374 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 91 WCBOE 018559 BUS 42 721090 712090 775THL3375 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 92 WCBOE 018560 BUS 78 721091 712091 775THL3376 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 93 WCBOE 018561 BUS 36 721092 712092 775THL3377 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 94 WCBOE 018562 BUS 70 721093 712093 775THL3378 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 95 WCBOE 018563 BUS 35 721094 712094 775THL3379 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 96 WCBOE 018564 BUS 132 721095 712095 775THL3380 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 97 WCBOE 018565 BUS 111 721096 712096 775THL3381 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 98 WCBOE 018566 BUS 511 (HL) 721097 712097 775THL3382 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 99 WCBOE 018567 BUS 63 721098 712098 775THL3383 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 100 WCBOE 018568 BUS 519 721099 712099 775THL3384 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 101 WCBOE 018569 BUS 81 721100 712100 775THL3385 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 102 WCBOE 018570 BUS 95-OOS 721101 712101 775THL3386 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 103 WCBOE 018571 BUS 83 721102 712102 775THL3387 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 104 WCBOE 018572 BUS 137 721103 712103 775THL3388 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 105 WCBOE 018573 BUS 79 721104 712104 775THL3389 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 106 WCBOE 018574 BUS 61 721105 712105 775THL3390 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 107 WCBOE 018575 BUS 140 721106 712106 775THL3391 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 108 WCBOE 018576 Removed 721107 712107 775THL3393 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 109 WCBOE 018577 BUS 513 (HL) 721108 712108 775THL3394 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 110 WCBOE 018578 BUS 27 721109 712109 775THL3395 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 111 WCBOE 018579 BUS 227 721110 712110 775THL3396 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 112 WCBOE 018580 BUS 489 721111 712111 775THL3397 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 113 WCBOE 018581 BUS 45 721112 712112 775THL3398 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 114 WCBOE 018582 BUS 9 721113 712113 775THL3399 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 115 WCBOE 018583 BUS 22 721114 712114 775THL3400 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 116 WCBOE 018584 BUS 39 721115 712115 775THL3401 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 117 WCBOE 018585 BUS 93 721116 712116 775THL3402 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 118 WCBOE 018586 BUS 138 721117 712117 775THL3403 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 119 WCBOE 018587 BUS 556 721118 712118 775THL3404 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 120 WCBOE 018588 BUS 51 721119 712119 775THL3405 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 121 WCBOE 018589 BUS 47 721120 712120 775THL3406 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500

5 of 51


# USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE122 WCBOE 018590 BUS 28 721121 712121 775THL3407 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 # USER Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE

123 WCBOE 018591 BUS 41 721122 712122 775THL3408 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 124 WCBOE 018592 BUS ? 721123 712123 775THL3409 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 125 WCBOE 018593 BUS 146 721124 712124 775THL3410 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 126 WCBOE 018594 BUS 123 721125 712125 775THL3412 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 127 WCBOE 018595 BUS 131 721126 712126 775THL3413 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 128 WCBOE 018596 BUS 30 721127 712127 775THL3414 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 129 WCBOE 018597 BUS 44 721128 712128 775THL3415 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 130 WCBOE 018598 BUS 50 721129 712129 775THL3416 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 131 WCBOE 018599 BUS 506 721130 712130 775THL3417 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 132 WCBOE 018600 BUS 563 721131 712131 775THL3418 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 133 WCBOE 018601 BUS 40S 721132 712132 775THL3424 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 134 WCBOE 018602 BUS 507 721133 712133 775THL3425 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 135 WCBOE 018603 BUS 06 721134 712134 775THL3426 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 136 WCBOE 018604 BUS 80S 721135 712135 775THL3427 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 137 WCBOE 018605 BUS 2S 721136 712136 775THL3428 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 138 WCBOE 018606 BUS 225-OOS 721137 712137 775THL3429 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 139 WCBOE 018607 BUS 236 721138 712138 775THL3430 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 140 WCBOE 018608 BUS 561 721139 712139 775THL3431 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 141 WCBOE 018609 BUS 485 721140 712140 775THL3432 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 142 WCBOE 018610 BUS 237 721141 712141 775THL3433 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 143 WCBOE 018611 BUS 234 721142 712142 775THL3434 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 144 WCBOE 018612 BUS 141S 721143 712143 775THL3435 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 145 WCBOE 018613 BUS 211 721144 712144 775THL3438 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 146 WCBOE 018614 BUS 231Out of Sys 721145 712145 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 147 WCBOE 018615 BUS 293 721146 712146 775THL3441 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 148 WCBOE 018616 BUS 247-OOS 721147 712147 775THL3442 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 149 WCBOE 018617 BOE 3 721148 712148 775THL3443 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 150 WCBOE 018618 BOE 4 721149 712149 775THL3444 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 151 WCBOE BUS 58 721150 712150 775CKF0270 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 152 WCBOE BUS 18 721151 712151 775CKF0269 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 153 WCBOE BUS 425 721152 712152 775CKF0271 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 154 WCBOE BUS 225 721153 712153 775CKF0268 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 155 WCBOE BUS 502 721154 712154 775CKF0272 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 156 WCBOE BUS 450 721155 712155 775CLB0165 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 157 WCBOE BUS 56 721156 712156 775CLB0166 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 158 WCBOE BUS 269 721157 712157 775CLB0167 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 159 WCBOE BUS 457 721158 712158 775CLB0168 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 160 WCBOE BUS 486 721159 712159 775CLB0169 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500 161 WCBOE BUS 77 721160 712160 775CLB0170 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL1500

6 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Board of Ed Portables

# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 WCBOE Beaver Run 018001 SCH1P1 721500 712500 687TGJ6363 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.52 WCBOE Beaver Run 018002 SCH1P2 721501 712501 687TGJ6364 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.53 WCBOE Central Office 018003 SCH99CP22 721502 712502 687TGJ6365 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.54 WCBOE Beaver Run 018004 SCH1P4 721503 712503 687TGJ6366 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.55 WCBOE Beaver Run 018005 SCH1P5 721504 712504 687TGJ6368 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.56 WCBOE Beaver Run 018006 SCH1P6 721505 712505 687TGJ6369 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.57 WCBOE Beaver Run 018007 SCH1P7 721506 712506 687TGJ6370 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.58 WCBOE Beaver Run 018008 SCH1P8 721507 712507 687TGW7494 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.59 WCBOE Beaver Run 018009 SCH1P9 721508 712508 687TGW7495 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.510 WCBOE Beaver Run 018010 SCH1P10 721509 712509 687TGW7496 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.511 WCBOE Beaver Run 018011 SCH1P11 721510 712510 687TGW7497 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.512 WCBOE Beaver Run 018012 SCH1P12 721511 712511 687TGW7498 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.512 WCBOE Beaver Run SCH1P13 721977 712977 687CLV2070 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.513 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018013 SCH2P1 721512 712512 687TGW7499 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.514 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018014 SCH2P2 721513 712513 687TGW7500 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.515 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018015 SCH2P3 721514 712514 687TGW7501 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.516 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018016 SCH2P4 721515 712515 687TGW7502 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.517 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018017 SCH2P5 721516 712516 687TGW7503 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.518 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018018 SCH2P6 721517 712517 687TGW7504 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.519 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018019 SCH2P7 721518 712518 687TGW7505 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.520 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018020 SCH2P8 721519 712519 687TGW7506 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.521 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018021 SCH2P9 721520 712520 687TGW7507 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.522 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018022 SCH2P10 721521 712521 687TGW7508 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.523 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018023 SCH2P11 721522 712522 687TGW7509 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.524 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018024 SCH2P12 721523 712523 687TGW7510 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.525 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018025 SCH2P13 721524 712524 687TGW7511 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.526 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018026 SCH2P14 721525 712525 687TGW7512 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.527 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018027 SCH2P15 721526 712526 687TGW7513 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.528 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018028 SCH2P16 721527 712527 687TGW7590 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.529 WCBOE Delmar Elem 018029 SCH2P17 721528 712528 687TGW7591 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.530 WCBOE East Sby 018030 SCH3P1 721529 712529 687TGW7592 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.531 WCBOE East Sby 018031 SCH3P2 721530 712530 687TGW7593 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.532 WCBOE East Sby 018032 SCH3P3 721531 712531 687TGW7594 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.533 WCBOE East Sby 018033 SCH3P4 721532 712532 687TGW7595 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.534 WCBOE East Sby 018034 SCH3P5 721533 712533 687TGW7596 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.535 WCBOE East Sby 018035 SCH3P6 721534 712534 687TGW7597 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.536 WCBOE East Sby 018036 SCH3P7 721535 712535 687TGW7598 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

7 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE37 WCBOE East Sby 018037 SCH3P8 721536 712536 687TGW7599 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.538 WCBOE East Sby 018038 SCH3P9 721537 712537 687TGW7600 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.539 WCBOE East Sby 018039 SCH3P10 721538 712538 687TGW7601 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.539 WCBOE East Sby 018039 SCH3P10 721538 712538 687TGW7601 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.540 WCBOE East Sby 018040 SCH3P11 721539 712539 687TGW7602 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.540 WCBOE East Sby SCH3P12 721979 712979 687CMR3904 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.541 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018041 SCH4P1 721540 712540 687TGW7603 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.542 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018042 SCH4P2 721541 712541 687TGW7604 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.543 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018043 SCH4P3 721542 712542 687TGW7605 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.544 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018044 SCH4P4 721543 712543 687TGW7606 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.545 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018045 SCH4P5 721544 712544 687TGW7607 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.546 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018046 SCH4P6 721545 712545 687TGW7608 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.547 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018047 SCH4P7 721546 712546 687TGW7609 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.548 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018048 SCH4P8 721547 712547 687TGW7634 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.549 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018049 SCH4P9 721548 712548 687TGW7717 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.550 WCBOE Fruit Primary 018050 SCH4P10 721549 712549 687TGW7737 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.551 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018051 SCH5P1 721550 712550 687TGW7738 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.552 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018052 SCH5P2 721551 712551 687TGW7739 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.553 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018053 SCH5P3 721552 712552 687TGW7741 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.554 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018054 SCH5P4 721553 712553 687TGW7742 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.555 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018055 SCH5P5 721554 712554 687TGW7744 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.556 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018056 SCH5P6 721555 712555 687TGW7745 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.557 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018057 SCH5P7 721556 712556 687TGW7746 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.558 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018058 SCH5P8 721557 712557 687TGW7748 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.559 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018059 SCH5P9 721558 712558 687TGW7749 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.560 WCBOE Fruit Inter. 018060 SCH5P10 721559 712559 687TGW7751 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.561 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018061 SCH6P1 721560 712560 678TGW7752 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.562 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018062 SCH6P2 721561 712561 678TGW7753 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.563 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018063 SCH6P3 721562 712562 678TGW7754 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.564 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018064 SCH6P4 721563 712563 678TGW7756 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.565 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018065 SCH6P5 721564 712564 678TGW7757 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.566 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018066 SCH6P6 721565 712565 678TGW7758 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.567 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018067 SCH6P7 721566 712566 678TGW7759 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.568 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018068 SCH6P8 721567 712567 678TGW7760 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.569 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018069 SCH6P9 721568 712568 678TGW7761 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.570 WCBOE Glen Avenue 018070 SCH6P10 721569 712569 678TGW7762 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

472 WCBOE Glen Avenue SCH6P11 721966 712966 687CLK1483 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

8 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE472 WCBOE Glen Avenue SCH6P12 721981 712981 687CMR3905 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.571 WCBOE North Sby 018071 SCH7P1 721570 712570 678TGW7763 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.572 WCBOE North Sby 018072 SCH7P2 721571 712571 678TGW7765 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.573 WCBOE North Sby 018073 SCH7P3 721572 712572 678TGW7766 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.574 WCBOE North Sby 018074 SCH7P4 721573 712573 678TGW7767 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.575 WCBOE North Sby 018075 SCH7P5 721574 712574 678TGW7768 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.576 WCBOE North Sby 018076 SCH7P6 721575 712575 678TGWC814 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.577 WCBOE North Sby 018077 SCH7P7 721576 712576 678TGWC815 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.578 WCBOE North Sby 018078 SCH7P8 721577 712577 678TGWC816 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE79 WCBOE North Sby 018079 SCH7P9 721578 712578 678TGWC817 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.580 WCBOE North Sby 018080 SCH7P10 721579 712579 678TGWC818 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

476 WCBOE North Sby SCH7P11 721970 712970 687CLK1484 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5477 WCBOE North Sby SCH7P12 721971 712971 687CLK1485 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.581 WCBOE Northwestern 018081 SCH8P1 721580 712580 678TGWC819 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.582 WCBOE Northwestern 018082 SCH8P2 721581 712581 678TGWC820 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.583 WCBOE Northwestern 018083 SCH8P3 721582 712582 678TGWC821 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.584 WCBOE Northwestern 018084 SCH8P4 721583 712583 678TGWC822 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.585 WCBOE Northwestern 018085 SCH8P5 721584 712584 678TGWC823 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.586 WCBOE Northwestern 018086 SCH8P6 721585 712585 678TGWC824 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.587 WCBOE Northwestern 018087 SCH8P7 721586 712586 678TGWC825 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.588 WCBOE Northwestern 018088 SCH8P8 721587 712587 678TGWC826 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.589 WCBOE Northwestern 018089 SCH8P9 721588 712588 678TGWC827 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.590 WCBOE Pemberton 018090 SCH9P1 721589 712589 678TGWC828 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.591 WCBOE Pemberton 018091 SCH9P2 721590 712590 678TGWC829 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.592 WCBOE Pemberton 018092 SCH9P3 721591 712591 678TGWC830 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.593 WCBOE Pemberton 018093 SCH9P4 721592 712592 678TGWC831 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.594 WCBOE Pemberton 018094 SCH9P5 721593 712593 678TGWD381 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.595 WCBOE Pemberton 018095 SCH9P6 721594 712594 687TGY1377 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.596 WCBOE Pemberton 018096 SCH9P7 721595 712595 687TGY1380 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.597 WCBOE Pemberton 018097 SCH9P8 721596 712596 687TGY1392 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.598 WCBOE Pemberton 018098 SCH9P9 721597 712597 687TGY1393 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.599 WCBOE Pemberton 018099 SCH9P10 721598 712598 687TGY1396 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

100 WCBOE Pemberton 018100 SCH9P11 721599 712599 687TGY1458 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

9 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE

101 WCBOE Pinehurst 018101 SC'H10P1 721600 712600 687TGY1459 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5102 WCBOE Pinehurst 018102 SCH10P2 721601 712601 687TGY1460 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5103 WCBOE Pinehurst 018103 SCH10P3 721602 712602 687TGY1461 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5104 WCBOE Pinehurst 018104 SCH10P4 721603 712603 687TGY1462 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5105 WCBOE Pinehurst 018105 SCH10P5 721604 712604 687TGY1463 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5106 WCBOE Pinehurst 018106 SCH10P6 721605 712605 687TGY1464 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5107 WCBOE Pinehurst 018107 SCH10P7 721606 712606 687TGY1465 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5108 WCBOE Pinehurst 018108 SCH10P8 721607 712607 687TGY1466 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5109 WCBOE Pinehurst 018109 SCH10P9 721608 712608 687TGY1467 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5110 WCBOE Pinehurst 018110 SCH10P10 721609 712609 687TGY1472 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5111 WCBOE Pinehurst 018111 SCH10P11 721610 712610 687TGY1473 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5112 WCBOE Pinehurst 018112 SCH10P12 721611 712611 687TGY1477 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5113 WCBOE Pinehurst 018113 SCH10P13 721612 712612 687TGY1478 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5114 WCBOE Pinehurst 018114 SCH10P14 721613 712613 687TGY1479 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5115 WCBOE Pinehurst 018115 SCH10P15 721614 712614 687TGY1481 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5116 WCBOE Pinehurst 018116 SCH10P16 721615 712615 687TGY1531 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5117 WCBOE Pinehurst 018117 SCH10P17 721616 712616 687TGY1532 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5118 WCBOE Pinehurst 018118 SCH10P18 721617 712617 687TGY1534 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5119 WCBOE Pinehurst 018119 SCH10P19 721618 712618 687TGY1535 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5120 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018120 SCH11P1 721619 712619 687TGY1536 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5121 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018121 SCH11P2 721620 712620 687TGY1537 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5122 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018122 SCH11P3 721621 712621 687TGY1538 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5123 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018123 SCH11P4 721622 712622 687TGY1913 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5124 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018124 SCH11P5 721623 712623 687TGY1914 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5125 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018125 SCH11P6 721624 712624 687TGY1915 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5126 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018126 SCH11P7 721625 712625 687TGY1916 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5127 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018127 SCH11P8 721626 712626 687TGY1917 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5128 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018128 SCH11P9 721627 712627 687TGY1919 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5129 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018129 SCH11P10 721628 712628 687TGY1920 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5130 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018130 SCH11P11 721629 712629 687TGY1922 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5131 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018131 SCH11P12 721630 712630 687TGY1923 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5132 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018132 SCH11P13 721631 712631 687TGY1924 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5133 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018133 SCH11P14 721632 712632 687TGY1966 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5134 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018134 SCH11P15 721633 712633 687TGY7096 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5135 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018135 SCH11P16 721634 712634 687TGY7097 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5135 WCBOE Pittsville Ele/mid 018135 SCH11P17 721983 712983 687CMZ3435 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

10 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE136 WCBOE Prince Street 018136 SCH13P1 721635 712635 687TGY7098 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5137 WCBOE Prince Street 018137 SCH13P2 721636 712636 687TGY7099 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5138 WCBOE Prince Street 018138 SCH13P3 721637 712637 687TGY7100 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE

140 WCBOE Prince Street 018140 SCH13P5 721639 712639 687TGY7102 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5141 WCBOE Prince Street 018141 SCH13P6 721640 712640 687TGY7103 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5142 WCBOE Prince Street 018142 SCH13P7 721641 712641 687TGY7104 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5143 WCBOE Prince Street 018143 SCH13P8 721642 712642 687TGY7105 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5144 WCBOE Prince Street 018144 SCH13P9 721643 712643 687TGY7106 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5145 WCBOE Prince Street 018145 SCH13P10 721644 712644 687TGY7107 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5146 WCBOE Prince Street 018146 SCH13P11 721645 712645 687TGY7108 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5146 WCBOE Prince Street SCH13P12 721975 712975 687CMK4504 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5146 WCBOE Prince Street SCH13P13 721976 712976 687CMK4505 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5147 WCBOE Chipman 018147 SCH14P1 721646 712646 687TGY7109 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5148 WCBOE Chipman 018148 SCH14P2 721647 712647 687TGY7110 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5149 WCBOE Chipman 018149 SCH14P3 721648 712648 687TGY7111 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5150 WCBOE Chipman 018150 SCH14P4 721649 712649 687TGY7112 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5151 WCBOE Chipman 018151 SCH14P5 721650 712650 687TGY7113 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5152 WCBOE Chipman 018152 SCH14P6 721651 712651 687TGY7114 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5153 WCBOE Chipman 018153 SCH14P7 721652 712652 687TGY7115 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5154 WCBOE Chipman 018154 SCH14P8 721653 712653 687THA5224 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5155 WCBOE Chipman 018155 SCH14P9 721654 712654 687THA5225 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5156 WCBOE West Sby 018156 SCH16P1 721655 712655 687THA5226 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5157 WCBOE West Sby 018157 SCH16P2 721656 712656 687THA5227 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5158 WCBOE West Sby 018158 SCH16P3 721657 712657 687THA5228 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5159 WCBOE West Sby 018159 SCH16P4 721658 712658 687THA5229 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5160 WCBOE West Sby 018160 SCH16P5 721659 712659 687THA5230 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5161 WCBOE West Sby 018161 SCH16P6 721660 712660 687THA5231 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5162 WCBOE West Sby 018162 SCH16P7 721661 712661 687THA5232 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5163 WCBOE West Sby 018163 SCH16P8 721662 712662 687THA5233 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5164 WCBOE West Sby 018164 SCH16P9 721663 712663 687THA5234 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5165 WCBOE Westside Pri 018165 SCH17P1 721664 712664 687THA5235 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5166 WCBOE Westside Pri 018166 SCH17P2 721665 712665 687THA5236 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5167 WCBOE Westside Pri 018167 SCH17P3 721666 712666 687THA5237 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5168 WCBOE Westside Pri 018168 SCH17P4 721667 712667 687THA5238 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5169 WCBOE Westside Pri 018169 SCH17P5 721668 712668 687THA5239 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5170 WCBOE Westside Pri 018170 SCH17P6 721669 712669 687THA5240 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

Radio was destroyed

11 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE171 WCBOE Westside Pri 018171 SCH17P7 721670 712670 687THA5241 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5172 WCBOE Westside Pri 018172 SCH17P8 721671 712671 687THA5242 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5173 WCBOE Westside Pri 018173 SCH17P9 721672 712672 687THA5243 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5174 WCBOE Westside Int. 018174 SCH18P1 721673 712673 687THA5244 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5175 WCBOE Westside Int. 018175 SCH18P2 721674 712674 687THA5245 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5176 WCBOE Westside Int. 018176 SCH18P3 721675 712675 687THA5246 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5177 WCBOE Westside Int. 018177 SCH18P4 721676 712676 687THA5247 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5178 WCBOE Westside Int. 018178 SCH18P5 721677 712677 687THA5248 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5179 WCBOE Westside Int. 018179 SCH18P6 721678 712678 687THA5249 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5180 WCBOE Westside Int. 018180 SCH18P7 721679 712679 687THA5250 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5181 WCBOE Westside Int. 018181 SCH18P8 721680 712680 687THA5251 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5182 WCBOE Westside Int. 018182 SCH18P9 721681 712681 687THA5252 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5183 WCBOE Westside Int. 018183 SCH18P10 721682 712682 687THA5253 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5183 WCBOE Westside Int. SCH18P11 721985 712985 687CMZ3436 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

WCBOE Westside Int. SCH18P12 721986 712986 687CNR4370 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5184 WCBOE Willards 018184 SCH19P1 721683 712683 687THA5254 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5185 WCBOE Willards 018185 SCH19P2 721684 712684 687THA5255 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5186 WCBOE Willards 018186 SCH19P3 721685 712685 687THA5256 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5187 WCBOE Willards 018187 SCH19P4 721686 712686 687THA5257 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5189 WCBOE Willards 018188 SCH19P5 721687 712687 687THA5258 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5190 WCBOE Willards 018189 SCH19P6 721688 712688 687THA5259 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5191 WCBOE Willards 018190 SCH19P7 721689 712689 687THA5261 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5192 WCBOE Willards 018191 SCH19P8 721690 712690 687THA5262 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5193 WCBOE Willards 018192 SCH19P9 721691 712691 687THA5263 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5194 WCBOE Wic Elc 018193 SCH23P1 721692 712692 687THA5264 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5195 WCBOE Wic Elc 018194 SCH23P2 721693 712693 687THA5265 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5196 WCBOE Wic Elc 018195 SCH23P3 721694 712694 687THA5266 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5197 WCBOE Wic Elc 018196 SCH23P4 721695 712695 687THA5267 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5198 WCBOE Wic Elc 018197 SCH23P5 721696 712696 687THA5268 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5199 WCBOE Wic Elc 018198 SCH23P6 721697 712697 687THA5269 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5200 WCBOE Wic Elc 018199 SCH23P7 721698 712698 687THA5270 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5201 WCBOE Wic Elc 018200 SCH23P8 721699 712699 687THA5271 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5202 WCBOE Wic Elc 018201 SCH23P9 721700 712700 687THA5272 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5479 WCBOE Wic Elc 848968 SCH23P10 721973 712973 687CVL2069 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

12 of 51



203 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018202 SCH40P1 721701 712701 687THA5273 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5204 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018203 SCH40P2 721702 712702 687THA5274 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5205 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018204 SCH40P3 721703 712703 687THA5275 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5206 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018205 SCH40P4 721704 712704 687THA5276 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5207 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018206 SCH40P5 721705 712705 687THA5278 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5208 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018207 SCH40P6 721706 712706 687THA5279 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5209 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018208 SCH40P7 721707 712707 687THA5280 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5210 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018209 SCH40P8 721708 712708 687THA528? H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5211 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018210 SCH40P9 721709 712709 687THA5281 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5212 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018211 SCH40P10 721710 712710 687THA5283 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5213 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018212 SCH40P11 721711 712711 687THA5282 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5214 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018213 SCH40P12 721712 712712 687THA5283 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5215 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018214 SCH40P13 721713 712713 687THA5284 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5216 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018215 SCH40P14 721714 712714 687THA5285 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5217 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018216 SCH40P15 721715 712715 687THA5286 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5218 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018217 SCH40P16 721716 712716 687THA5287 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5219 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018218 SCH40P17 721717 712717 687THA5288 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5220 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018219 SCH40P18 721718 712718 687THA5289 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5221 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018220 SCH40P19 721719 712719 687THA5290 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5222 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018221 SCH40P20 721720 712720 687THA5291 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5222 WCBOE Bennett Mid 018221 SCH40P21 721984 712984 687CMK4506 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5223 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018222 SCH41P1 721721 712721 687THA5292 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5224 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018223 SCH41P2 721722 712722 687THA5293 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5225 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018224 SCH41P3 721723 712723 687THA5294 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5226 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018225 SCH41P4 721724 712724 687THA5295 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5227 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018226 SCH41P5 721725 712725 687THA5296 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5228 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018227 SCH41P6 721726 712726 687THA5297 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5229 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018228 SCH41P7 721727 712727 687THA5298 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5230 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018229 SCH41P8 721728 712728 687THA5299 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5231 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018230 SCH41P9 721729 712729 687THA5300 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5232 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018231 SCH41P10 721730 712730 687THA5301 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5233 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018232 SCH41P11 721731 712731 687THA5302 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5234 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018233 SCH41P12 721732 712732 687THA5303 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5235 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018234 SCH41P13 721733 712733 687THA5304 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5236 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018235 SCH41P14 721734 712734 687THA5305 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5237 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018236 SCH41P15 721735 712735 687THA5306 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

13 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE238 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018237 SCH41P16 721736 712736 687THA5307 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5239 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018238 SCH41P17 721737 712737 687THA5308 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5240 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018239 SCH41P18 721738 712738 687THA5309 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5241 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018240 SCH41P19 721739 712739 687THA5310 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE

242 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018241 SCH41P20 721740 712740 687THA5312 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5243 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018242 SCH41P21 721741 712741 687THA5314 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5244 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018243 SCH41P22 721742 712742 687THA5315 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5245 WCBOE Bennett Hi 018244 SCH41P23 721743 712743 687THA5316 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5473 WCBOE Bennett Hi SCH41P24 721967 712967 687CLK1486 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5474 WCBOE Bennett Hi SCH41P25 721968 712968 687CLK1487 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5475 WCBOE Bennett Hi SCH41P26 721969 712969 687CLK1488 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5478 WCBOE Bennett Hi 848967 SCH41P27 721972 712972 687CVL2068 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5245 WCBOE Bennett Hi SCH41P28 721978 712978 687CMK4503 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5245 WCBOE Bennett Hi SCH41P29 721979 712979 687CMR3903 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5246 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018245 SCH42P1 721744 712744 687THA5317 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5247 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018246 SCH42P2 721745 712745 687THA5318 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5248 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018247 SCH42P3 721746 712746 687THA5319 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5249 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018248 SCH42P4 721747 712747 687THA5320 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5250 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018249 SCH42P5 721748 712748 687THG5321 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5251 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018250 SCH42P6 721749 712749 687THG2491 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5252 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018251 SCH42P7 721750 712750 687THG2492 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5253 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018252 SCH42P8 721751 712751 687THG2493 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5254 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018253 SCH42P9 721752 712752 687THG2494 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5255 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018254 SCH42P10 721753 712753 687THG2495 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5256 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018255 SCH42P11 721754 712754 687THG2497 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5257 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018256 SCH42P12 721755 712755 687THG2498 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5258 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018257 SCH42P13 721756 712756 687THG2499 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5259 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018258 SCH42P14 721757 712757 687THG2500 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5260 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018259 SCH42P15 721758 712758 687THG2502 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5261 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018260 SCH42P16 721759 712759 687THG2508 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5262 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018261 SCH42P17 721760 712760 687THG0530 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5263 WCBOE Mardela Mid/Hi 018262 SCH42P18 721761 712761 687THG2531 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5264 WCBOE Parkside 018263 SCH43P1 721762 712762 687THL1110 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5265 WCBOE Parkside 018264 SCH43P2 721763 712763 687THL1120 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5266 WCBOE Parkside 018265 SCH43P3 721764 712764 687THL1126 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5267 WCBOE Parkside 018266 SCH43P4 721765 712765 687THL1150 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

14 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE268 WCBOE Parkside 018267 SCH43P5 721766 712766 687THL1151 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5269 WCBOE Parkside 018268 SCH43P6 721767 712767 687THL1153 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5270 WCBOE Parkside 018269 SCH43P7 721768 712768 687THL1155 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5271 WCBOE Parkside 018270 SCH43P8 721769 712769 687THL1158 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5272 WCBOE Parkside 018271 SCH43P9 721770 712770 687THL1159 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5273 WCBOE Parkside 018272 SCH43P10 721771 712771 687THL1160 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5274 WCBOE Parkside 018273 SCH43P11 721772 712772 687THL1162 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5275 WCBOE Parkside 018274 SCH43P12 721773 712773 687THL1165 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5276 WCBOE Parkside 018275 SCH43P13 721774 712774 687THL1166 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5277 WCBOE Parkside 018276 SCH43P14 721775 712775 687THL1168 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5278 WCBOE Parkside 018277 SCH43P15 721776 712776 687THL1193 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5279 WCBOE Parkside 018278 SCH43P16 721777 712777 687THL1194 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5280 WCBOE Parkside 018279 SCH43P17 721778 712778 687THL1195 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5281 WCBOE Parkside 018280 SCH43P18 721779 712779 687THL1196 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5282 WCBOE Parkside 018281 SCH43P19 721780 712780 687THL1204 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5283 WCBOE Parkside 018282 SCH43P20 721781 712781 687THL1253 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5284 WCBOE Parkside 018283 SCH43P21 721782 712782 687THL1256 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5285 WCBOE Parkside 018284 SCH43P22 721783 712783 687THL1257 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5286 WCBOE Parkside 018285 SCH43P23 721784 712784 687THL1260 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5287 WCBOE Parkside 018286 SCH43P24 721785 712785 687THL1261 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5288 WCBOE Parkside 018287 SCH43P25 721786 712786 687THL1262 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5289 WCBOE Parkside 018288 SCH43P26 721787 712787 687THL1263 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5290 WCBOE Parkside 018289 SCH43P27 721788 712788 687THL1264 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5291 WCBOE Parkside SCH43P28 721980 712980 687CMR3906 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5291 WCBOE Wic Mid 018290 SCH45P1 721789 712789 687THL1265 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5292 WCBOE Wic Mid 018291 SCH45P2 721790 712790 687THL1266 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5293 WCBOE Wic Mid 018292 SCH45P3 721791 712791 687THL1267 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5294 WCBOE Wic Mid 018293 SCH45P4 721792 712792 687THL1268 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5295 WCBOE Wic Mid 018294 SCH45P5 721793 712793 687THL1269 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5296 WCBOE Wic Mid 018295 SCH45P6 721794 712794 687THL1277 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5297 WCBOE Wic Mid 018296 SCH45P7 721795 712795 687THL1279 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5298 WCBOE Wic Mid 018297 SCH45P8 721796 712796 687THL1281 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5299 WCBOE Wic Mid 018298 SCH45P9 721797 712797 687THL1358 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5300 WCBOE Wic Mid 018299 SCH45P10 721798 712798 687THL1359 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5301 WCBOE Wic Mid 018300 SCH45P11 721799 712799 687THL1362 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5302 WCBOE Wic Mid 018301 SCH45P12 721800 712800 687THL1366 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5303 WCBOE Wic Mid 018302 SCH45P13 721801 712801 687THL1371 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

15 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE304 WCBOE Wic Mid 018303 SCH45P14 721802 712802 687THL1372 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5305 WCBOE Wic Mid 018304 SCH45P15 721803 712803 687THL1373 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5306 WCBOE Wic Mid 018305 SCH45P16 721804 712804 687THL1381 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5307 WCBOE Wic Mid 018306 SCH45P17 721805 712805 687THL1383 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5308 WCBOE Wic Mid 018307 SCH45P18 721806 712806 687THL1387 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5309 WCBOE Wic Mid 018308 SCH45P19 721807 712807 687THL1393 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5310 WCBOE Wic Mid 018309 SCH45P20 721808 712808 687THL1394 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

16 of 51



311 WCBOE Wic Hi 018310 SCH46P1 721809 712809 687THL1395 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5312 WCBOE Wic Hi 018311 SCH46P2 721810 712810 687THL1397 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5313 WCBOE Wic Hi 018312 SCH46P3 721811 712811 687THL1398 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5314 WCBOE Wic Hi 018313 SCH46P4 721812 712812 687THL1399 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5315 WCBOE Wic Hi 018314 SCH46P5 721813 712813 687THL1400 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5316 WCBOE Wic Hi 018315 SCH46P6 721814 712814 687THL1401 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5317 WCBOE Wic Hi 018316 SCH46P7 721815 712815 687THL1403 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5318 WCBOE Wic Hi 018317 SCH46P8 721816 712816 687THL1404 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5319 WCBOE Wic Hi 018318 SCH46P9 721817 712817 687THL1405 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5320 WCBOE Wic Hi 018319 SCH46P10 721818 712818 687THL1406 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5321 WCBOE Wic Hi 018320 SCH46P11 721819 712819 687THL1415 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5322 WCBOE Wic Hi 018321 SCH46P12 721820 712820 687THL1416 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5323 WCBOE Wic Hi 018322 SCH46P13 721821 712821 687THL1417 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5324 WCBOE Wic Hi 018323 SCH46P14 721822 712822 687THL1419 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5325 WCBOE Wic Hi 018324 SCH46P15 721823 712823 687THL1432 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5326 WCBOE Wic Hi 018325 SCH46P16 721824 712824 687THL1436 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5327 WCBOE Wic Hi 018326 SCH46P17 721825 712825 687THL1438 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5328 WCBOE Wic Hi 018327 SCH46P18 721826 712826 687THL1439 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5329 WCBOE Wic Hi 018328 SCH46P19 721827 712827 687THL1448 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5330 WCBOE Wic Hi 018329 SCH46P20 721828 712828 687THL1450 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5331 WCBOE Wic Hi 018330 SCH46P21 721829 712829 687THL1451 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5332 WCBOE Wic Hi 018331 SCH46P22 721830 712830 687THL1453 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5333 WCBOE Wic Hi 018332 SCH46P23 721831 712831 687THL1454 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5334 WCBOE Wic Hi 018333 SCH46P24 721832 712832 687THL1455 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5335 WCBOE Wic Hi 018334 SCH46P25 721833 712833 687THL1476 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5336 WCBOE Wic Hi 018335 SCH46P26 721834 712834 687THL1481 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5337 WCBOE Wic Hi 018336 SCH46P27 721835 712835 687THL1483 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5338 WCBOE Wic Hi 018337 SCH46P28 721836 712836 687THL1484 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5339 WCBOE Wic Hi 018338 SCH46P29 721837 712837 687THL1487 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5340 WCBOE Wic Alc 018339 SCH47P1 721838 712838 687THL1488 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5341 WCBOE Wic Alc 018340 SCH47P2 721839 712839 687THL1489 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5342 WCBOE Wic Alc 018341 SCH47P3 721840 712840 687THL1490 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5343 WCBOE Wic Alc 018342 SCH47P4 721841 712841 687THL1492 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5344 WCBOE Wic Alc 018343 SCH47P5 721842 712842 687THL1493 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5345 WCBOE Wic Alc 018344 SCH47P6 721843 712843 687THL1494 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5346 WCBOE Wic Alc 018345 SCH47P7 721844 712844 687THL1495 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

17 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE347 WCBOE Wic Alc 018346 SCH47P8 721845 712845 687THL1496 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5348 WCBOE Wic Alc 018347 SCH47P9 721846 712846 687THL1497 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5349 WCBOE Wic Alc 018348 SCH47P10 721847 712847 687THL1498 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE

350 WCBOE Wic Alc 018349 SCH47P11 721848 712848 687THL1499 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5351 WCBOE Wic Alc 018350 SCH47P12 721849 712849 687THL1501 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5352 WCBOE Wic Alc 018351 SCH47P13 721850 712850 687THL1502 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5353 WCBOE Wic Alc 018352 SCH47P14 721851 712851 687THL1503 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5354 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018353 SCH48P1 721852 712852 687THL1504 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5355 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018354 SCH48P2 721853 712853 687THL1506 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5357 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018356 SCH48P4 721855 712855 687THL1509 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5359 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018358 SCH48P6 721857 712857 687THL1511 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5360 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018359 SCH48P7 721858 712858 687THL1512 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5361 WCBOE Wi Hi Evn 018360 SCH48P8 721859 712859 687THL1513 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5362 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018361 SCH49P1 721860 712860 678THL1514 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5363 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018362 SCH49P2 721861 712861 678THL1516 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5364 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018363 SCH49P3 721862 712862 678THL1517 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5365 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018364 SCH49P4 721863 712863 678THL1519 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5366 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018365 SCH49P5 721864 712864 678THL1520 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5367 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018366 SCH49P6 721865 712865 678THL1521 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5368 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018367 SCH49P7 721866 712866 678THL1522 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5369 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018368 SCH49P8 721867 712867 678THL1524 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5370 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018369 SCH49P9 721868 712868 678THL1525 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5371 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018370 SCH49P10 721869 712869 678THL1526 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5372 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018371 SCH49P11 721870 712870 678THL1528 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5373 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018372 SCH49P12 721871 712871 678THL1532 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5374 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018373 SCH49P13 721872 712872 678THL1534 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5375 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018374 SCH49P14 721873 712873 678THL1536 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5376 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018375 SCH49P15 721874 712874 678THL1537 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5377 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018376 SCH49P16 721875 712875 678THL1538 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5378 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018377 SCH49P17 721876 712876 678THL1539 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5379 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018378 SCH49P18 721877 712877 678THL1540 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5380 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018379 SCH49P19 721878 712878 678THL1541 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5381 WCBOE Salisbury Mid 018380 SCH49P20 721879 712879 678THL1542 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5381 WCBOE Salisbury Mid SCH49P21 721974 712974 687CLV2071 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

Salisbury Mid SCH49P22 721987 712987 687CNR4371 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5383 WCBOE Holly Center 018381 SCH99HP1 721880 712880 678THL1543 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

18 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE384 WCBOE Central Office 018382 SCH99CP1 721881 712881 678THL1550 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5385 WCBOE Central Office 018383 SCH99CP3 721882 712882 678THL1602 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5386 WCBOE Central Office 018384 SCH99CP4 721883 712883 678THL1603 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5387 WCBOE Central Office 018385 SCH99CP5 721884 712884 678THL1605 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5388 WCBOE Central Office 018386 SCH99CP6 721885 712885 678THL1962 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5389 WCBOE Central Office 018387 SCH99CP7 721886 712886 678THL1963 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5390 USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE391 WCBOE Central Office 018388 SCH99CP8 721887 712887 678THL1964 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5392 WCBOE Central Office 018389 SCH99CP9 721888 712888 678THL1965 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5393 WCBOE Central Office 018390 SCH99CP10 721889 712889 678THL1966 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5394 WCBOE Central Office 018391 SCH99CP11 721890 712890 687THL1967 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5395 WCBOE Central Office 018392 SCH99CP12 721891 712891 687THL1968 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5396 WCBOE Central Office 018393 SCH99CP13 721892 712892 687THL1969 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5397 WCBOE Central Office 018394 SCH99CP14 721893 712893 687THL1970 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5398 WCBOE Central Office 018395 SCH99CP15 721894 712894 687THL1971 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5399 WCBOE Central Office 018396 SCH99CP16 721895 712895 687THL1972 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5400 WCBOE Central Office 018397 SCH99CP17 721896 712896 687THL1973 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5401 WCBOE Central Office 018398 SCH99CP18 721897 712897 687THL1974 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5402 WCBOE Central Office 018399 SCH99CP19 721898 712898 687THL1976 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5466 WCBOE Central Office SCH99CP20 721960 712960 687THS1552 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5470 WCBOE Central Office 18462 SCH99CP21 721964 712964 687THS1555 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5471 WCBOE Central Office 018463 SCH47P15 721965 712965 687THS1553 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5356 WCBOE Central Office 018355 SCH99CP23 721854 712854 687THL1508 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5358 WCBOE Central Office 018357 SCH99CP24 721856 712856 687THL1510 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5403 WCBOE Annexx 018400 SCH99AP1 721899 712899 687THL1977 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5404 WCBOE Annexx 018401 SCH99AP2 721900 712900 687THL1978 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5405 WCBOE Annexx 018402 SCH99AP3 721901 712901 687THL1979 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5406 WCBOE Annexx 018403 SCH99AP4 721902 712902 687THL1980 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5407 WCBOE Transportation 018404 SCH99TP1 721903 712903 687THL1981 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5408 WCBOE Transportation 018405 SCH99TP2 721904 712904 687THL1999 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5409 WCBOE Transportation 018406 SCH99TP3 721905 712905 687THL2392 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5410 WCBOE Transportation 018407 SCH99TP4 721906 712906 687THL2393 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5411 WCBOE Transportation 018408 SCH99TP5 721907 712907 687THL2394 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5412 WCBOE Transportation 018409 SCH99TP6 721908 712908 687THL2395 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5413 WCBOE Transportation 018410 SCH99TP7 721909 712909 687THL2396 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

19 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE414 USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE415 WCBOE Facilites 018411 SCH99FP1 721910 712910 687THL2397 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5416 WCBOE Facilites 018412 SCH99FP2 721911 712911 687THL2398 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5417 WCBOE Facilites 018413 SCH99FP3 721912 712912 687THL2400 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5418 WCBOE Facilites 018414 SCH99FP4 721913 712913 687THL2401 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5419 WCBOE Facilites 018415 SCH99FP5 721914 712914 687THL2402 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5420 WCBOE Facilites 018416 SCH99FP6 721915 712915 687THL2403 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5421 WCBOE Facilites 018417 SCH99FP7 721916 712916 687THL2404 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5422 WCBOE Facilites 018418 SCH99FP8 721917 712917 687THL2405 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5423 WCBOE Facilites 018419 SCH99FP9 721918 712918 687THL2406 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5424 WCBOE Facilites 018420 SCH99FP10 721919 712919 687THL2407 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5425 WCBOE Facilites 018421 SCH99FP11 721920 712920 687THL2408 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5426 WCBOE Facilites 018422 SCH99FP12 721921 712921 687THL2409 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5427 WCBOE Facilites 018423 SCH99FP13 721922 712922 687THL2410 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5428 WCBOE Facilites 018424 SCH99FP14 721923 712923 687THL2411 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5429 WCBOE Facilites 018425 SCH99FP15 721924 712924 687THL2412 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5430 WCBOE Facilites 018426 SCH99FP16 721925 712925 687THL2413 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5431 WCBOE Facilites 018427 SCH99FP17 721926 712926 687THL2414 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5432 WCBOE Facilites 018428 SCH99FP18 721927 712927 687THL2415 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5433 WCBOE Facilites 018429 SCH99FP19 721928 712928 687THL2416 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5434 WCBOE Facilites 018430 SCH99FP20 721929 712929 687THL2417 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5435 WCBOE Facilites 018431 SCH99FP21 721930 712930 687THL2418 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5436 WCBOE Facilites 018432 SCH99FP22 721931 712931 687THL2419 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5437 WCBOE Facilites 018433 SCH99FP23 721932 712932 687THL2420 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5438 WCBOE Facilites 018434 SCH99FP24 721933 712933 687THL2421 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5439 WCBOE Facilites 018435 SCH99FP25 721934 712934 687THL2422 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5440 WCBOE Facilites 018436 SCH99FP26 721935 712935 687THL2423 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5441 WCBOE Facilites 018437 SCH99FP27 721936 712936 687THL2424 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5442 WCBOE Facilites 018438 SCH99FP28 721937 712937 687THL2425 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5443 WCBOE Facilites 018439 SCH99FP29 721938 712938 687THL2426 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5444 WCBOE Facilites 018440 SCH99FP30 721939 712939 687THL2427 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5445 WCBOE Facilites 018441 SCH99FP31 721940 712940 687THL2428 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5446 WCBOE Facilites 018442 SCH99FP32 721941 712941 687THL2429 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5447 WCBOE Facilites 018443 SCH99FP33 721942 712942 687THL2430 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5448 WCBOE Facilites 018444 SCH99FP34 721943 712943 687THL2431 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5449 WCBOE Facilites 018445 SCH99FP35 721944 712944 687THL2432 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5450 WCBOE Facilites 018446 SCH99FP36 721945 712945 687THL2434 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

20 of 51


# USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE451 WCBOE Facilites 018447 SCH99FP37 721946 712946 687THL2435 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5452 WCBOE Facilites 018448 SCH99FP38 721947 712947 687THL2436 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5453 WCBOE Facilites 018449 SCH99FP39 721948 712948 687THL2438 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5454 USER SCHOOL Label ALIAS WIC ID SBY UID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE455 WCBOE Facilites 018450 SCH99FP40 721949 712949 687THL2439 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5456 WCBOE Facilites 018451 SCH99FP41 721950 712950 687THL2443 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5457 WCBOE Facilites 018452 SCH99FP42 721951 712951 687THL2446 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5458 WCBOE Facilites 018453 SCH99FP43 721952 712952 687THL2447 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5459 WCBOE Facilites 018454 SCH99FP44 721953 712953 687THL2448 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5460 WCBOE Facilites 018455 SCH99FP45 721954 712954 687THL2449 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5461 WCBOE Facilites 018456 SCH99FP46 721955 712955 687THL2451 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5462 WCBOE Facilites 018457 SCH99FP47 721956 712956 687THL2452 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5463 WCBOE Facilites 018458 SCH99FP48 721957 712957 687THL2475 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5464 WCBOE Admin BOE1 721958 712958 721CGP3802 H18UCF9W6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII 465 WCBOE Admin BOE2 721959 712959 721CGP3803 H18UCF9W6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII 467 WCBOE Facilites SCH99FP49 721961 712961 687THS1550 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5468 WCBOE Facilites SCH99FP50 721962 712962 687THS1554 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5469 WCBOE Holloway Transit HOLLOWAY PT1 721963 712963 687CJF1975 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PM1.5

21 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico Cnty.Health Department

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 HEALTH HDPT 1 706383 736383 722822 481CPF0656 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 2 HEALTH HDPT 2 706384 736384 722823 481CPF0650 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 3 HEALTH 706385 736385 7228244 HEALTH 706386 736386 7228255 HEALTH HDPT 5 706387 736387 722819 721CFK1394 H18UCC9PW5AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMI6 HEALTH HDPT 6 706388 736388 722820 721CHM1932 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII7 HEALTH HDPT 7 706389 736389 722821 721CHM1933 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII8 HEALTH HDPT 8 706390 736390 722826 721CJM3040 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII9 HEALTH HDPT 9 706391 736391 722827 721CJM3041 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII10 HEALTH HDPT 10 706392 736392 722828 721CJM3042 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII11 HEALTH HDPT 11 706393 736393 722829 721CJM3043 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII12 HEALTH HDPT 12 706394 736394 722830 721CJZ0019 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII13 HEALTH HDPT 13 706395 736395 722831 721CJZ0018 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII14 HEALTH HDPT 14 706396 736396 722832 721CKM0995 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII15 HEALTH HDPT 15 706397 736397 722833 721CKM0996 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII16 HEALTH HDPT 16 706398 736398 722896 721CLH0574 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII17 HEALTH HDPT 17 706399 736399 722898 721CKR0973 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII18 HEALTH HDPT 18 706400 736400 722899 721CKR0940 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII19 HEALTH HDPT 19 706401 736401 722900 721CKR0941 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII20 HEALTH HDPT 20 706402 736402 722901 721CKR0983 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII21 HEALTH HDPT 21 706403 736403 722902 721CKR0988 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII22 HEALTH HDPT 22 706404 736404 722911 481CMR1453 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 22 HEALTH HDPT 23 706405 736405 722912 481CNP0138 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000

22 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Airport

# USER WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 ARFF 1 MOBILE 703400 733400 722AZL0113 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 MMII 2 AIRPORT 19 703401 733401 722AZL0114 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 MMII 3 AIRPORT 1 MOB 703402 733402 775CLH0986 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 XTL1500 M4 AIRPORT 2 MOB 703403 733403 775CLH0987 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 XTL1500 M5 ARFF 1 HT 703426 733426 466AZE5618 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI6 ARFF 2 HT 703427 733427 466AZE5619 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI7 703428 733428 466AZE5620 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI8 AIRPORT 2 HT 703431 733431 466AAA4562 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI9 TOWER 703432 733432 466AAA4563 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

10 AIRPORT 18 703444 733444 722AZL0146 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 MMII 11 AIRPORT 6 703435 733435 466AAU1880 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI12 AIRPORT 5 703436 466CDC0666 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MCS2000 MMII 13 AIRPORT1 HT 703440 733440 466AAA4561 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI14 AIRPORT 3 HT 703441 733441 466AAU3490 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI15 AIRPORT 4 HT 703442 733442 466AAU3494 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI16 AIRPORT BASE 703443 733443 466CDN0311 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI17 AIRPORT 3 MOB 703433 733433 775CMF1844 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 XTL1500 M18 AIRPORT 4 MOB 703434 733434 775CMF1845 M28URS9PW1AN 700/800 XTL1500 M19 OOS 703435 N/A 6788BL1379 H10UCH6DC5BN 800 MHZ LTS2000 6788BL1381 H10UCH6DC5BN 800 MHZ LTS2000Removed from service: 2/4/08

23 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Perdue (Sta 6)

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID S/N MODEL TYPE1 PERDUE PERDUE 1 702650 732650 721CGR3094 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII2 PERDUE PERDUE 2 702651 732651 721CGR3095 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII3 PERDUE PERDUE 3 702652 732652 721CGR3096 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII

24 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Holly Center

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 Holly Center HC1 706427 736427 205CEJ0775 H46UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS2500 PMII

25 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Deers Head

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 Deers Head DH1 706411 736411 205CEJ0776 H46UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS2500 PMII2 Deers Head DH2 706412 736412 721CKP1589 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII

26 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 Wicomico Cnty. Control Stations

# USER LOCATION WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 WCFD STA.16 702099 732099 722AZE0763 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII2 WCFD STA.1 702199 732199 722AZL0171 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII3 WCFD STA.2 702299 732299 722AZL0172 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII4 WCFD STA.3 702399 732399 722AZL0173 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII5 WCFD STA.5 702599 732599 722AZL0174 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII6 WCFD STA.6 702699 732699 722AZL0175 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII7 WCFD STA.7 702799 732799 722AZL0176 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII8 WCFD STA.8 702899 732899 722AZL0177 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII9 WCFD STA.9 702999 732999 722AZL0178 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII10 WCFD STA.11 703099 733099 722AZL0179 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII11 WCFD STA.12 703199 733199 722AZL0180 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII12 WCFD STA.14 703299 733299 722AZL0181 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII13 WCFD STA.15 703399 733399 722AZL0164 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII14 WCDC WCDC CENTRAL N/A 722AZE0760 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII15 WCDC SA1 706019 N/A 722AZE9761 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII16 WCDC BOOKING 706997 N/A 722AZE0762 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII17 FPD FPD 710299 740299 500CGZ0713 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000 MMII18 911 RAD MANT CNTRL 706020 N/A 722AZL0112 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII19 DELMAR PD DELMAR PD 710030 N/A M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MODEL II20 911 PAGE REBRD N/A N/A M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII21 911 SBY FD REBRD N/A N/A 722AAA1322 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII22 911 GENWATCH RF MODEM N/A N/A M01UGL6PW4AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 15W MMI23 911 GENWATCH MODEM N/A N/A 722ACA1347 M01UGL6PW4AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 15W MMI24 911 GENWATCH MODEM N/A N/A 722ACA1348 M01UGL6PW4AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 15W MMI25 SOMERSET 911 706783 N/A M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 15W MMII26 SPD SPD 709760 700760 722AZG1062 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII27 SU BASE 710400 740400 N/A 500CFC1493 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000 MMII28 PRMC EOC BASE 713900 743900 566ATJ0144 D35KGA5JB5AK SPECTRA29 HUM HUMANE CNTRL 704099 734099 722AZL0162 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII30 HUM HUMANE MED BASE 704390 734390 722AZL0134 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII31 EM EM SMAG CNTRL 706012 736012 722AZL0098 M01UJM6PW6AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 35W MMII

27 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 WCDC, 911-ADMIN, RACES,EM,COMMS

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE1 WCDC SGT BARE 706750 736750 466AZE1673 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII2 WCDC JIM WELSH 706751 736751 466AZE1674 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII3 WCDC WCDC UNIT 44 706754 736754 466AZL0593 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII4 WCDC WARDEN PORT 706756 736756 466AZL0595 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII5 WCDC WCDC UNIT 88 706756 736756 466AZL0596 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII6 WCDC WCDC UNIT 45 706757 736757 466AZL0597 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII7 WCDC DEP.DIRECTOR 706758 736758 466AZL0598 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII8 WCDC REED SEC 706759 736759 466AZL0616 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII9 WCDC WCDC UNIT 43 706760 736760 466AZL0600 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII

10 WCDC WCDC W/R 1 706761 736761 466AZL0601 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII11 WCDC COL.KIMBALL 706762 736762 466AZL0602 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII12 WCDC B. SHOCKLEY 706763 736763 466AZL0603 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII13 WCDC SGT ENNIS K9 706764 736764 466AZL0604 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII14 WCDC MAJ. MOORE 706765 736765 466AZL0605 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII15 WCDC A. PARRISH 706766 736766 466AZL0606 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII16 WCDC UNIT 15 706767 736767 466AZL0607 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII17 WCDC ARCE 706768 736768 466AZL0608 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI18 WCDC MAJ. ELLIOTT 706769 736769 466AZL0609 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII19 WCDC K9 DOWNING 706770 736770 466AZL0610 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII20 WCDC CAPT. FORMAN 706771 736771 466AZL0611 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII21 WCDC CENT.BOOKINGCS 706997 73699722 WCDC CENTRAL BOOK'N 706999 73699923 WCDC A. PARKS 706250 736250 466AZE1521 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI24 WCDC WCDC UNIT 50 706251 736251 466AZE1522 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII25 WCDC WCDC UNIT 52 706252 736252 466AZL0322 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI26 WCDC WCDC UNIT 47 706253 736253 466AZL0323 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI27 WCDC D. HUNTER 706254 736254 466AZL0324 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI28 WCDC WCDC UNIT 20 706255 736255 466AZL0325 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI29 WCDC WCDC UNIT 65 706256 736256 466AZL0326 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI30 WCDC WCDC UNIT 21 706257 736257 466AZL0327 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI31 WCDC WCDC UNIT 13 706258 736258 466AZL0328 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI32 WCDC WCDC UNIT 22 706259 736259 466AZL0329 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI33 WCDC WCDC UNIT 46 706260 736260 466AZL0330 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI34 WCDC WCDC UNIT 23 706261 736261 466AZL0331 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI35 WCDC WCDC B&R 2 706262 736262 466AZL0332 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI36 WCDC D. WHITTINGTON 706263 736263 466AZL0333 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

28 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE37 WCDC WCDC UNIT 56 706264 736264 466AZL0334 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE

38 WCDC WCDC UNIT 58 706265 736265 466AZL0335 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI39 WCDC WCDC UNIT 51 706266 736266 466AZL0336 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI40 WCDC WCDC UNIT 60 706267 736267 466AZL0337 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI41 WCDC WCDC UNIT 24 706268 736268 466AZL0338 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI42 WCDC M. SMITH 706269 736269 466AZL0339 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI43 WCDC WCDC UNIT 55 706270 736270 466AZL0340 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI44 WCDC UNIT 85 LANDFILL 706271 736271 466AZL0341 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI45 WCDC WCDC UNIT 66 706272 736272 466AZL0342 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI46 WCDC K. LEWIS 706273 736273 466AZL0343 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI47 WCDC WCDC UNIT 18 706274 736274 466AZL0344 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI48 WCDC WCDC UNIT 25 706275 736275 466AZL0345 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI49 WCDC WCDC UNIT 70 706276 736276 466AZL0346 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI50 WCDC JOHNSON 706277 736277 466AZL0347 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI51 WCDC M. HAMMOND 706278 736278 466AZL0348 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI52 WCDC WCDC UNIT 26 706279 736279 466AZL0349 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI53 WCDC C. ROBINSON 706280 736280 466AZL0350 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI54 WCDC TOPPIN 706281 736281 466AZL0351 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI55 WCDC WCDC UNIT 27 706282 736282 466AZL0352 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI56 WCDC WCDC UNIT 62 706283 736283 466AZL0353 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI57 WCDC SUPERVISOR V/M 706284 736284 466AZL0354 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI58 WCDC J. HEARNE 706285 736285 466AZL0355 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI59 WCDC SGT DICKERSON 706286 736286 466AZL0356 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI60 WCDC WCDC UNIT 68 706287 736287 466AZL0357 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI61 WCDC WCDC UNIT 49 706288 736288 466AZL0358 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI62 WCDC SGT.O. BYRD 706289 736289 466AZL0359 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI63 WCDC WCDC UNIT 72 706290 736290 466AZL0360 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI64 WCDC WCDC UNIT 48 706291 736291 466AZL0361 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI65 WCDC B. NIBBLETT 706292 736292 466AZL0362 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI66 WCDC WCDC UNIT 41 706293 736293 466AZL0363 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI67 WCDC O. ARCE 706294 736294 466AZL0364 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI68 WCDC LT. JAMISON 706295 736295 466AZL0365 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI69 WCDC WCDC UNIT 40 706296 736296 466AZL0366 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI70 WCDC WCDC UNIT 57 706297 736297 466AZL0367 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI71 WCDC WCDC UNIT 28 706298 736298 466AZL0368 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

29 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE72 WCDC WCDC UNIT 54 706299 736299 466AZL0369 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI73 WCDC WCDC UNIT 29 706300 736300 466AZL0370 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI74 WCDC WCDC UNIT 64 706301 736301 466AZL0371 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI75 WCDC T. JAMES 706302 736302 466AZL0372 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI76 WCDC WCDC UNIT 14 706303 736303 466AZL0373 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE

77 WCDC WCDC UNIT 30 706304 736304 466AZL0374 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI78 WCDC B.FASSET 706305 736305 466AZL0375 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI79 WCDC L.TOWNSEND 706306 736306 466AZL0376 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI80 WCDC WCDC UNIT 31 706307 736307 466AZL0377 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI81 WCDC CZAPKIEWCZ 706308 736308 466AZL0378 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI82 WCDC C. ARMSTRONG 706309 736309 466AZL0379 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI83 WCDC T. WILLIAMS 706310 736310 466AZL0380 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI84 WCDC WCDC UNIT 32 706311 736311 466AZL0381 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI85 WCDC T. ABNER 706312 736312 466AZL0382 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI86 WCDC SGT. ROWLEY 706313 736313 466AZL0383 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI87 WCDC A. BLAKE 706314 736314 466AZL0384 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI88 WCDC H. SIMMS 706315 736315 466AZL0385 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI89 WCDC E. FISSEL 706316 736316 466AZL0386 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI90 WCDC T. McCREADY 706317 739317 466AZL0387 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI91 WCDC WCDC UNIT 33 706318 736318 466AZL0388 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI92 WCDC WCDC UNIT 34 706319 736319 466AZL0389 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI93 WCDC WCDC UNIT 10 706320 736320 466AZL0390 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI94 WCDC WCDC UNIT 75 706321 736321 466AZL0391 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI95 WCDC WCDC UNIT 35 706322 736322 466AZL0392 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI96 WCDC WCDC UNIT 73 706323 736323 466AZL0393 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI97 WCDC WCDC UNIT 74 706324 736324 466AZL0394 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI98 WCDC B.ARMSTRONG 706325 736325 466AZL0395 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI99 WCDC WCDC UNIT 79 706326 736326 466AZL0396 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

100 WCDC J. QUILLEN 706327 736327 466AZL0397 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI101 WCDC A. PASSWATERS 706328 736328 466AZL0398 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI102 WCDC WCDC UNIT 3 706329 736329 466AZL0399 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI103 WCDC WCDC UNIT 36 706330 736330 466AZL0400 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI104 WCDC UNIT 86 RD CRW 1 706331 736331 466AZL0401 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI105 WCDC LT. DEAL 706332 736332 466AZL0402 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI106 WCDC WCDC UNIT 61 706333 736333 466AZL0403 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

30 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE107 WCDC SGT.STEVENSON 706334 736334 466AZL0404 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI108 WCDC WCDC UNIT 76 706335 736335 466AZL0405 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI109 WCDC A.DICKERSON JR 706336 736336 466AZL0406 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI110 WCDC WCDC UNIT 63 706337 736337 466AZL0407 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI111 WCDC C.MORRIS 706338 736338 466AZL0408 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI112 WCDC H. POLK 706339 736339 466AZL0409 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI113 WCDC CJ. PRESTON 706340 736340 466AZL0410 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI114 WCDC M. BRITTINGHAM 706341 736341 466AZL0411 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI115 WCDC J. EVANS 706342 736342 466AZL0412 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE116 WCDC WCDC UNIT 39 706343 736343 466AZL0413 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI117 WCDC WCDC UNIT 38 706344 736344 466AZL0414 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI118 WCDC R. BOUNDS 706345 736345 466AZL0415 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI119 WCDC HOVATTER 706346 763346 466AZL0416 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI120 WCDC WCDC UNIT 67 706347 736347 466AZL0417 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI121 WCDC WCDC UNIT 59 706348 736348 466AZL0418 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI122 WCDC WCDC B&R 1 706349 736349 466AZL0419 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI123 WCDC SGT WATSON 706351 736351 466AZL0421 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI124 WCDC J.COOPER 706352 736352 466AZL0422 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI125 WCDC WCDC UNIT 53 706353 736353 466AZL0423 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI126 WCDC S. KENNEY 706354 736354 466AZL0424 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI127 WCDC LT. D. KELLY 706355 736355 466AZL0425 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI128 WCDC DICKERSON 706356 736356 466AZL0426 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI129 WCDC ART SOMERS 706357 736357 466AZL0427 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI130 WCDC R. MESSICK 706358 736358 466AZL0428 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI131 WCDC WCDC UNIT 77 706359 736359 466AZL0429 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI132 WCDC T. STITLEY 706360 736360 466AZL0430 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI133 WCDC WCDC UNIT 71 706361 736361 466AZL0431 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI134 WCDC S. CUSTIS 706362 736362 466AZL0432 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI135 WCDC JOYCE SMITH 706363 736363 466AZL0433 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI136 WCDC WCDC SPARE 34 706364 736364 466AZL0434 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI137 WCDC UNIT 87 RD CREW2 706365 736365 466AZL0435 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI138 WCDC WCDC UNIT 37 706366 736366 466AZL0436 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI139 WCDC LT. MURRY 706367 736367 466AZL0437 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI140 WCDC HUMPRIES 706368 736368 466AZL0438 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI141 WCDC D.TRUITT 706369 736369 466AZL0439 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

31 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE142 WCDC R.LAWSON 706370 736370 466AZE5621 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI143 WCDC WCDC UNIT 78 706371 736371 466AZE5626 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII144 WCDC WCDC W/R 2 706372 736372 466AZE5627 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII145 WCDC WCDC UNIT 69 706373 736373 466AZE5628 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII146 WCDC WCDC UNIT 42 WILL 706374 736374 466AWJ3580 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI

32 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE

SYADM SYSADMIN 1 706776 736776 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII1 SYADM SYSADMIN 6 706777 736777 466AZL0592 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII3 WCES 911 HT1 706779 736779 721CKX2519 H01UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII4 911 ASTRO 11 706780 736780 466AZE5624 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI5 911 ASTRO 1 706781 736781 326AAE4960 H09UCF9PW7BN 800 MHZ XTS3000 PMII6 911 ASTRO 2 706782 736782 326AAE4961 H09UCF9PW7BN 800 MHZ XTS3000 PMII7 SYADM CCS1 706783 736783 466AZL0318 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII 8 EM RACES 1 706786 736786 466AZL0313 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI9 EM RACES 2 706785 736785 466AAS1846 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII

10 COMMS POOL 1 706790 736790 763005 722759 466AZL0612 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII11 COMMS POOL 2 706791 736791 763006 722760 466AUL4692 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII12 COMMS POOL 3 706792 736792 763007 722761 466AVN5925 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII13 COMMS POOL 4 706793 736793 763008 722762 466AUA0868 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII14 COMMS POOL 5 706794 736794 466AZL0318 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII15 COMM RM1 1 706795 736795 466AZL0612 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII16 COMMS POOL 6 706796 736796 466AVN5923 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII17 COMMS POOL 7 706802 736802 763069 722718 755193 466AUS1180 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII18 COMMS POOL 8 706805 736805 466AVL8125 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII19 COMMS POOL 29 706810 736810 466AAU1883 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII20 COMMS EM-PRMC 706813 736813 466ATN5189 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII21 COMMS POOL 11 706780 736780 466AZL0320 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII22 COMMS POOL 12 706814 736814 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI23 COMMS POOL13 706815 736815 466AZE5622 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI24 COMMS POOL 14 706816 736816 466AZL0613 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII25 COMMS POOL 15 706817 736817 466AZL0314 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII26 COMMS POOL 9 706818 736818 466AAE4731 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII27 COMMS POOL 10 706819 736819 466AUA0865 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII28 COMMS POOL 16 706820 736820 466AUA0871 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII29 COMMS POOL 17 706821 736821 466AWN3341 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII30 COMMS POOL 18 706822 736822 466AVL8126 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII31 COMMS POOL 19 706823 736823 466ATN5194 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII32 COMMS POOL 20 706824 736824 466AUS1183 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII33 911 BEN WARD 706797 736797 466AZL1615 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII34 COMMS POOL 21 706798 736798 466CCU0956 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII35 COMMS POOL 22 704416 734416 326AAE4960 HO9UCF9PW7BN 800 MHZ XTS3000 PMII

33 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE36 COMMS POOL 23 704417 734417 326AAE4961 HO9UCF9PW7BN 800 MHZ XTS3000 PMII37 COMMS POOL 24 706825 736825 466AWN3338 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII38 COMMS POOL 25 706826 736826 466AUA0863 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII39 PURCH PUR 1 / DAWN 706806 736806 466AUA0874 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI40 EM EM 3 INKROTE 706807 736807 763724 723342 755150 721CFE1181 H18UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII41 PURCH PUR 3 / STOLEN 706799 736799 466AAU3493 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI42 911 EM4 LORENZO 706774 736774 763000 722757 755100 721CFA2529 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMIII43 911 EM1 SHIPLEY 706775 736775 763001 722758 755101 655CPK2339 H97TGD9PW1AN 700/800/VHF APX7000 PM III44 EM EM2 SCHWEIKERT 706773 736773 763002 722753 755102 655CPK2338 H97TGD9PW1AN 700/800/VHF APX7000 PM III45 EM CCS 1-Chris 706787 736787 763003 722754 755103 655CPK2340 H97TGD9PW1AN 700/800/VHF APX7000 PM III46 COMMS RM1 706772 736772 763004 722755 755104 721CFA2527 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMIII47 COMMS RM1 706808 736808 763017 722752 755148 2659997 655CNB0322 H97TGD9PW1AN 700/800/VHF APX7000 PM III48 COMMS SYS ADMIN 10 706788 736788 700/800 XTL1500 M49 COMMS RM2 706800 736800 763518 722716 755167 721CGV1493 H18UCH9PW7AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMIII50 COMMS RM2 706800 736800 763518 687TGY7101 H66UCD9PW5BN 800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI51 COMMS SM 1 706753 736753 744052 722717 755105 2659998 655CKZ2485 H97TGD9PW1AN 700/800/VHF APX7000 PM III52 SYADM SYSADMIN 2 706752 736752 466AZL0313 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI53 WCDC BILL NUTTER SR 706753 736753 721CGP0896 HO1UCH6PW1BN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII54 PUR 2 706828 736828 466AZE5625 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI55 FRST ST TOWER 1 706829 721CFH2720 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM II56 RACES 1 M 706830 736830 722AWE0211 M01UGL6PW4AN 800 MHZ MCS2000 MM I57 COMMS EM 11 706803 736803 466AZL0318 H01UCD6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI58 PURCH PUR 2 706804 736804 721CKK1685 H01UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ XTS5000 PMII59 COMMS POOL 27 706827 736827 466AAE4730 H01UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII60 SYS AD BIKEWEEK 706811 736811BIKE WEEK 500CJM0890 M20URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ XTL5000 0561 EXECUTIVE CNTY EXECUTIVE 706795 736795 466AWN3530 HO1UCH6PW1BN 700/800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII62 CNTY ADMN COUNTY ADMIN 706789 736789 722AZL0166 M01UJM6PW6AN 700/800 MHZ MCS2000 63 CNTY ADMIN PORT CNTY ADMIN PORT 706784 736784 466AZL0614 H01UCH6PW1BN 700/800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII64 911 CENTRAL ALT 1 706812 736812 481CMR1765 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II65 911 CENTRAL ALT 2 706813 736813 481CMR1766 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II66 911 CENTRAL ALT 3 706814 736814 481CMR1767 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II67 911 CENTRAL ALT 4 706815 736815 481CMR1768 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II68 911 CENTRAL ALT 5 706816 736816 481CMR1769 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II69 911 CENTRAL ALT 6 706817 736817 481CMR1770 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II70 911 CENTRAL ALT 7 706818 736818 481CMR1771 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II71 911 CENTRAL ALT 8 706819 736819 481CMR1772 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II

34 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE72 911 CENTRAL ALT 9 706820 736820 481CMR1773 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II73 911 CENTRAL ALT 10 706821 736821 481CMR1774 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II74 911 CENTRAL ALT 11 706822 736822 481CMR1775 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II75 911 CENTRAL ALT 12 706823 736823 481CMR1776 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II76 911 CENTRAL ALT 13 706824 736824 481CMR1777 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II

35 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE

77 COMMS SYS ADMIN 2 706980 736980 481CPZ9878 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II78 COMMS SYS ADMIN 3 706981 736981 481CPZ9879 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II79 COMMS SYS ADMIN 4 706982 736982 481CPZ9880 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II80 COMMS SYS ADMIN 5 706983 736983 481CPH0524 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II81 SYS ADMIN 7 706778 481CPK3354 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II82 COMMS SPARE MOBILE 1 527CPX2177 M25URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ APX6500 O5 HEAD83 COMMS SPARE MOBILE 2 527CPX2178 M25URS9PW1AN 700/800 MHZ APX6500 O5 HEAD84 COMMS POOL 30 706767 736767 466AZL0607 HO1UCH6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMIII85 COMMS SM OFFICE 500CEQ3344 800 MHZ XTL5000 W3 HEAD86 COMMS SM OFFICE 500CGR1468 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD87 COMMS RACES 1 706780 721CFA2527 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM III P2588 COMMS RACES 2 706779 721CFA2525 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM III P2589 COMMS RACES 3 721CFA2530 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM III P2590 COMMS SM OFFICE TRANS MONITOR 721CEG3229 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM III 91 COMMS SPARE 721CEG3231 H18UCH9PW7AN 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM III 92 COMMS SPARE 721CKX2522 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM II93 COMMS SPARE 721CJK3768 800 MHZ XTS5000 PM II94 COMMS SPARE 326AYN0769 800 MHZ XTS3000 PM II95 COMMS SM OFFICE DLEMARVA M 466AAU3489 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMI96 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 466AZL0592 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII97 COMMS SPARE 466AWN3527 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII98 COMMS SPARE 466AZL0591 H01UCF6PW1BN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PMII99 COMMS SPARE 466AAU3491 M01UGL6PW4AN 800 MHZ MTS2000 PM

100 COMMS SPARE 656CPB4007 H98UCF9PW6AN 700/800 MHZ APX6000 PM II101 COMMS SPARE 500CGR1465 M20URSPW1AN 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD102 COMMS SPARE 500CEE1061 800 MHZ XTL5000 W3 HEAD103 COMMS SPARE 656CNB1192 700/800 MHZ APX7500104 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 500CJM0890 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD105 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 500CFG2589 800 MHZ XTL5000 W2 HEAD106 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 500CGR1465 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD107 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 500CGF1980 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD DASH108 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 500CHP0271 800 MHZ XTL5000 05 HEAD DASH109 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 527CPK1786 700/800 MHZ APX6500 O5 HEAD110 COMMS SM OFFICE SPARE 722AAL2616 800 MHZ MCS2000 MM II

COMMS

36 of 51


# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SOM SN MODEL TYPE COMMS COMMS

37 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 SMAG

# USER DEPT ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID S/N MODEL TYPE1 SMAG1 720975 687CMD0777 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.52 SMAG2 720976 687CMD0778 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.53 SMAG3 720977 687CMD0779 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.54 SMAG4 720978 687CMD0780 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.55 SMAG5 720979 687CMD0781 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.56 SMAG6 720980 687CMD0782 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.57 SMAG7 720981 687CMD0783 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.58 SMAG8 720982 687CMD0784 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.59 SMAG9 720983 687CMD0785 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.510 SMAG10 720984 687CMD0786 H66UCD9PW5BN 700/800 MHZ XTS1500 PMI.5

38 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 SOLID WASTE COUNTY ROADS

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE1 SW PORT 1 SW PORT 1 720251 687CNK1417 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.52 SW PORT 2 SW PORT 2 720252 687CNK1418 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.53 LEE OUTEN SW PORT 3 720253 687CNK1419 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.54 SW PORT 4 SW PORT 4 720254 687CNK1420 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.55 SW PORT 5 SW PORT 5 720255 687CNK1421 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.56 JOHN REDDEN SW PORT 6 720256 687CNK1422 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.57 SW PORT 7 SW PORT 7 720257 687CNK1423 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.58 SW PORT 8 SW PORT 8 720258 687CNK1424 H66UCD9PW5BN XTS1500 PM1.5

10 SW SCALE HOUSE SCALE HSE 720259 775CKN0264 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M11 SW QUANTICO QUANTICO 720260 775CKN0266 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M12 SW BIVALE BIVALE 720261 775CKN0269 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M13 SW AIRPORT AIRPORT 720262 775CKN0259 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M14 SW WANGO WANGO 720263 775CKN0271 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M15 SW PBURG PBURG 720264 775CKN0257 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M16 SW DELMAR DELMAR 720265 775CKN0265 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M17 SW SHARPTOWN SHARPTWN 720266 775CKN0272 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M18 SW MARDELA MARDELA 720267 775CKN0250 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M19 SW HEBRON HEBRON 720268 775CKN0258 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M20 SW SALISBURY SBY 720269 775CKN0255 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M21 SW OFFICE OFFICE 720270 775CKN0270 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M22 SW 54 KAWASAKI 720271 775CKN0274 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M23 SW 203 ROLLOFF 720272 775CKN0276 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M24 SW 206 ROLLOFF 720273 775CKN0252 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M25 SW 207 ROLLOFF 720274 775CKN0273 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M26 SW 208 ROLLOFF 720275 775CKN0262 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M27 SW 211 DUMP TRK 720276 775CKN0260 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M28 SW 109 PICKUP 720277 775CKN0254 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M29 SW 217 DUMP TRK 720278 775CKN0251 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M30 SW 218 DUMP TRK 720279 775CKN0284 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M31 SW 310 LEACHATE 720280 775CKN0267 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M32 SW 311 RECYCLING 720281 775CKN0278 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M33 SW 101 MARK 720282 775CKN0256 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M34 SW 102 STEVE 720283 775CKN0277 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M35 SW 103 PICKUP 720284 775CKN0253 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M36 SW 104 PICKUP 720285 775CKN0275 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M37 SW 110 MIKE 720286 775CKN0261 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M38 SW 111 TUBGRINDER 720287 775CKN0268 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M39 SW 125 SHOP 720288 775CKN0263 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M40 SW FRUITLAND 720289 775CNK0285 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M

39 of 51

COUNTY_USEAGE_REBANDING_4-7-2014 SOLID WASTE COUNTY ROADS

# USER ALIAS WIC ID SBY ID DEL ID DOR ID UMDES ID SN MODEL TYPE41 SW 517 720290 775CNM0268 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M42 SW 127 720291 775CNM0269 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M43 SW 14/524 720292 775CNM0270 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M44 SW 521 720293 775CNM0271 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M45 SW 505 720294 775CNM0272 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M46 SW 526 720295 775CNM0273 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M47 SW 525 720296 775CNM0274 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M48 SW 507 720297 775CNM0275 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M49 SW 128 720298 775CNM0276 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M50 SW TRUCK 9 720299 775CNM0277 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M51 SW 510 720300 775CNM0278 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M52 SW 528 720301 775CNM0279 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M53 SW 523 720302 775CNM0280 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M54 SW 302 720303 775CNM0281 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M55 SW 527 720304 775CNM0282 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M56 SW 530 720305 775CNM0283 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M57 SW 529 720306 775CNM0284 M28URS9PW1AN XTL1500 M58 SW CO RDS OFFICE 720307 722AZL0160 M01IJM6PW6AN MCS 2000

40 of 51

RA

INTADI

APST

TERO C

PPETAT

ROPCON

END

TEWPERA

TRO

DIX BWIDE

ABIOL B

B E ILITYBOA

Y ARDD

EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.

Underlining indicates amendments to bill.

Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by

amendment.

*hb0308*

HOUSE BILL 308 E4 4lr0156

CF SB 338

By: The Speaker (By Request – Administration)

Introduced and read first time: January 21, 2014

Assigned to: Health and Government Operations and Appropriations

Committee Report: Favorable

House action: Adopted

Read second time: February 19, 2014

CHAPTER ______

AN ACT concerning 1

Public Safety – Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board – Established 2

FOR the purpose of establishing the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board 3

in the Department of Information Technology; providing for the membership, 4

appointment, terms, staggering of terms, chair, meetings, and staffing of the 5

Board; establishing that members of the Board may not receive a certain 6

compensation but are entitled to a certain reimbursement; establishing certain 7

duties and responsibilities of the Board; defining certain terms; specifying the 8

terms of the initial members of the Board; specifying the intent of the General 9

Assembly; and generally relating to the Statewide Public Safety Interoperability 10

Radio System and the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board. 11

BY adding to 12

Article – Public Safety 13

Section 1–501 through 1–503 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 5. Statewide 14

Interoperability Radio Control Board” 15

Annotated Code of Maryland 16

(2011 Replacement Volume and 2013 Supplement) 17

SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 18

MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 19

Article – Public Safety 20

SUBTITLE 5. STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO CONTROL BOARD. 21

2 HOUSE BILL 308

1–501. 1

(A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 2

INDICATED. 3

(B) “BOARD” MEANS THE STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO 4

CONTROL BOARD. 5

(C) “SYSTEM” MEANS THE STATEWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY 6

INTEROPERABILITY RADIO SYSTEM, ALSO KNOWN AS MARYLAND FIRST (FIRST 7

RESPONDER INTEROPERABLE RADIO SYSTEM TEAM), THAT PROVIDES 8

INTEROPERABLE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS TO FIRST RESPONDERS IN THE 9

STATE. 10

(D) “USER” MEANS A STATE, FEDERAL, COUNTY, OR MUNICIPAL 11

AGENCY THAT HAS ESTABLISHED INTEROPERABILITY WITH THE SYSTEM AND 12

OPERATES ON THE SYSTEM AS ITS PRIMARY MEANS OF DAILY RADIO 13

COMMUNICATION. 14

1–502. 15

(A) THERE IS A STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY RADIO CONTROL 16

BOARD IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 17

(B) THE BOARD CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS: 18

(1) THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, OR THE 19

SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 20

(2) THE SECRETARY OF STATE POLICE, OR THE SECRETARY’S 21

DESIGNEE; 22

(3) THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, OR THE SECRETARY’S 23

DESIGNEE; 24

(4) THE DIRECTOR OF THE MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR 25

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; 26

(5) THE STATE INTEROPERABILITY DIRECTOR; 27

(6) THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HOMELAND 28

SECURITY, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; AND 29

HOUSE BILL 308 3

(7) FIVE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR WHO 1

REPRESENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES THAT ARE EITHER USERS OF OR 2

CONTRIBUTORS TO THE SYSTEM. 3

(C) IN SELECTING REPRESENTATIVES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 4

ENTITIES UNDER SUBSECTION (B)(7) OF THIS SECTION, THE GOVERNOR SHALL: 5

(1) APPOINT MEMBERS WHO REPRESENT THE INTEROPERABILITY 6

REGIONS OF THE STATE WITH EXPERTISE IN PUBLIC SAFETY AND 7

COMMUNICATIONS ISSUES RELEVANT TO VARIED LOCATIONS; 8

(2) CONSULT WITH THE MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, 9

THE MARYLAND MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, AND APPROPRIATE LOCAL PUBLIC 10

SAFETY ORGANIZATIONS AND PROFESSIONALS; AND 11

(3) GIVE PRIMARY CONSIDERATION TO STATE AGENCIES AND 12

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT HAVE ADOPTED THE SYSTEM AS A PRIMARY 13

PLATFORM FOR THEIR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS NEEDS. 14

(D) (1) THE TERM OF A MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR IS 4 15

YEARS AND SHALL BEGIN ON JUNE 1. 16

(2) THE TERMS OF THE APPOINTED MEMBERS ARE STAGGERED 17

AS REQUIRED BY THE TERMS PROVIDED FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ON JUNE 18

1, 2014. 19

(3) AT THE END OF A TERM, AN APPOINTED MEMBER CONTINUES 20

TO SERVE UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS APPOINTED AND QUALIFIES. 21

(4) IF A VACANCY OCCURS AFTER A TERM HAS BEGUN, THE 22

GOVERNOR SHALL APPOINT A SUCCESSOR TO REPRESENT THE ORGANIZATION 23

OR GROUP IN WHICH THE VACANCY OCCURS. 24

(5) A MEMBER WHO IS APPOINTED AFTER A TERM HAS BEGUN 25

SERVES ONLY FOR THE REST OF THE TERM AND UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS 26

APPOINTED AND QUALIFIES. 27

(6) A MEMBER MAY BE REAPPOINTED FOR A SECOND 4–YEAR 28

TERM AT THE REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR. 29

(E) THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OR THE 30

SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE SHALL SERVE AS THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD. 31

4 HOUSE BILL 308

(F) THE BOARD SHALL MEET AS NECESSARY, BUT AT LEAST ONCE EACH 1

QUARTER. 2

(G) A MEMBER OF THE BOARD: 3

(1) MAY NOT RECEIVE COMPENSATION AS A MEMBER OF THE 4

BOARD; BUT 5

(2) IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES UNDER THE 6

STANDARD STATE TRAVEL REGULATIONS, AS PROVIDED IN THE STATE 7

BUDGET. 8

(H) THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SHALL 9

PROVIDE STAFF TO THE BOARD, INCLUDING: 10

(1) A DIRECTOR OF THE BOARD WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 11

DAILY OPERATION OF THE BOARD; AND 12

(2) STAFF TO HANDLE THE INCREASED DUTIES RELATED TO 13

COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. 14

1–503. 15

(A) THE BOARD SHALL COORDINATE THE OPERATION AND 16

MAINTENANCE OF A STATEWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY INTEROPERABILITY RADIO 17

SYSTEM. 18

(B) THE BOARD’S RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE: 19

(1) ESTABLISHING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES, 20

QUALITY OF SERVICE STANDARDS, AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR THE 21

SYSTEM; 22

(2) ESTABLISHING WORKING GROUPS OF THE SYSTEM’S USERS, 23

INCLUDING: 24

(I) A SYSTEM MANAGERS COMMITTEE TO ADVISE ON 25

TECHNICAL SYSTEM ISSUES, SUCH AS UPGRADES, SECURITY, AND 26

ENHANCEMENTS; AND 27

HOUSE BILL 308 5

(II) A SYSTEM USERS COMMITTEE TO ADVISE ON 1

OPERATIONAL ISSUES, SUCH AS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES, 2

PERFORMANCE, AND USAGE OF RESOURCES; 3

(3) APPROVING THE ADDITION OF NEW SYSTEM USERS AND THE 4

REMOVAL OF EXISTING USERS; 5

(4) COORDINATING PARTICIPATORY, COLLABORATIVE, OR 6

RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, INCLUDING 7

ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR: 8

(I) REQUESTS TO BECOME PART OF THE SYSTEM BY LOCAL 9

GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES; 10

(II) COLLABORATION OR SHARING IN THE PURCHASE, 11

OPERATION, OR USE OF EQUIPMENT OR BY THE SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE 12

CURRENTLY USED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES; AND 13

(III) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF ANY REQUESTS OR 14

ARRANGEMENTS SOUGHT UNDER THIS ITEM; 15

(5) RESOLVING ANY CONFLICTS AMONG SYSTEM USERS 16

RELATING TO THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE 17

SYSTEM THAT CANNOT BE RESOLVED UNDER THE STANDARD OPERATING 18

PROCEDURES; 19

(6) REVIEWING THE ANNUAL COST ESTIMATION PROVIDED BY 20

THE DIRECTOR OF THE BOARD; 21

(7) RECOMMENDING TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL 22

ASSEMBLY FUNDING AND RESOURCE LEVELS FOR SYSTEM OPERATION AND 23

MAINTENANCE; 24

(8) ADVISING THE GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON 25

RESOURCES NEEDED FOR APPROPRIATE OPERATION AND EXPANSION TO MEET 26

SERVICE NEEDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS STATEWIDE; AND 27

(9) NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES, 28

SURROUNDING STATES, OR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE USE OF THE 29

SYSTEM. 30

(C) IT IS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THAT THE BOARD 31

SHALL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE GUIDANCE AND INPUT FROM THE BODIES 32

6 HOUSE BILL 308

CURRENTLY CONSTITUTED UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 01.01.2008.07, 1

INCLUDING THE STATEWIDE INTEROPERABILITY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2

(SIEC) FOR AS LONG AS THE EXECUTIVE ORDER IS IN EFFECT. 3

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the terms of the initial 4

members of the Statewide Interoperability Radio Control Board who are subject to 5

appointment shall expire as follows: 6

(1) two appointed members in 2016; 7

(2) two appointed members in 2017; and 8

(3) one appointed member in 2018. 9

SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 10

June 1, 2014. 11

Approved:

________________________________________________________________________________

Governor.

________________________________________________________________________________

Speaker of the House of Delegates.

________________________________________________________________________________

President of the Senate.

AP

STCO

PPE

TATOMP

END

E CPAR

DIX C

COSTISO

C

T ON

5/14/2014 Motorola Starcom21 - Fee Structure

http://motorolastarcom21.com/fee_structure.html 1/5

FEE STRUCTURE

AFFORDABLE STARCOM21 FEE OPTIONS CAN SAVE YOU MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

The STARCOM21 network is a unique public/private partnership that makes it unnecessary for government agencies tofund and deploy their own mobile communications networks, potentially saving millions of dollars.

STARCOM21 provides the critical communications for first responders and other public safety and public worksagencies need … with minimal capital expense and remarkably affordable fixed user fees that deliver exceptionally lowtotal cost of ownership (TCO).

RATES AND RATE CLASSES

STARCOM21 offers a range of options and five basic rate classes, shown as a per user/per month cost:

Rate Category Description Year 1

7/1/2012-

6/31/2013

Year 2 -10

7/1/2013-

6/31/2022

Loading Discount*(per every 500 radios over

36,000)

Based on Total SystemUser Count

Statewide Use* Allows for routine Statewide system access.

State Agency User

Count<=9,500

$53/mo $65/mo $1 (up to $30 max discount)

Level 1

Reduction

State Agency UserCount

>9,500 & <=13,000

N/A $58/mo $1 (up to $23 max discount)

Level 2State Agency User

Count N/A $54/mo $1 (up to $19 max discount)



Reduction >13,000 & <=16,000

Level 3

Reduction

State Agency User

Count

>16,000

N/A $50/mo $1 (up to $15 max discount)

County Use Applies to Users that typically operate within the geographic boundaries

of a single designated County. Usage outside the designated County is

allowed only for emergency or mutual aid situations.


Local Use Applies to Users that typically operate within the jurisdictional boundariesof a City, Village, Town or designated campus type environment. Usage

outside the designated boundaries is allowed only for emergency or

mutual aid situations.


Limited Use Applies to Users that require access on a limited basis for the purpose of

mutual aid, interoperability or intermittent operations. May also apply to

occasional access to data features, local emergency and event

coordination outside of the ITTF program irregular or infrequent use.

$18/mo $18/mo None

Specialty Use Applies to Users that require only occasional emergency use of the

network or as authorized under agreement with the Illinois Terrorism TaskForce (ITTF), IDPH or other entities as approved by the STARCOM21

Oversight Committee and/or its designee and Motorola Solutions.

$10/mo $10/mo None

Campus Use Applies to Users with geographically concentrated operations and high

User counts. Typical examples include prisons, college campuses or

hospitals. Assumes Users will rarely roam off their designated campus.

Use of the Campus Use rate is subject to the approval of the STARCOM21

Oversight Committee and/or its designee and Motorola Solutions. Rates

are negotiated on a case-by-case basis and are determined by assessing

User operational and technical parameters and will be reviewed by the

STARCOM21 Oversight Committee and/or its designee. Rates are

memorialized in the State’s Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) for State

Agency Users and in User Agreements for non-State Agencies Users.

Variable Variable None



Port Access Applies to Users that have unique requirements and do not fit any of the

defined rates categories. Typically Port Access will apply to operation on

User owned sites connected to the STARCOM21 Network Master Site.

Port user fees are negotiated between Motorola Solutions and the

applicant Agency(s) on a case-by-case basis. Port access is subject to

STARCOM21 Oversight Committee approval and/or its designee.


Gateway

Access

There are two types of Gateway Access supported, traditional Audio

Patching and P25 ISSI.

Audio Patching

Users that require Gateway Access for audio patching that has been

approved by the STARCOM21 Oversight Committee and/or its designee

will pay a monthly fee for Gateway Use which shall be calculated as

follows:

The base rate shall be equivalent to the Specialty Rate ($10 per radio per

month)

Usage outside the parameters of the Specialty rate shall be charged

airtime as follows:

o ISR Sites – $1 per minute/per site (rounded to the nearest minute and

billed monthly)

o Simulcast Sites – $2.25 per minute/per site (rounded to the nearest

minute and billed monthly)

P25 ISSI

Project 25 (P25) Inter RF Subsystem Interface (P25 ISSI) provides an IP

interface for connecting multiple P25 systems together. This will allowusers to roam onto other P25 systems providing network-to-network

interoperability and will be used as approved by the STARCOM21

Oversight Committee and/or its designee.

The specific rate structure for P25 ISSI services will be determined when

the technology is fully enabled on the STARCOM21 network. An

associated Impact Fee and the installation of User purchased

Infrastructure equipment may also be required to utilize P25 ISSI services.




Dual Radio

Discounting*

Users with vehicles that have a mobile and portable STARCOM21 radio

assigned would be billed at the $18 per month Limited use rate for their

secondary radio. The primary radio would be billed at their normal rate

class. Limitations apply. See notes below.

$18/mo $18/mo None

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP

When you’re under strict budget pressure, Total Cost of Ownership becomes one of your major network managementconcerns. The STARCOM21 network offers the opportunity for agencies to possibly lower or eliminate some TCO

expenses they would otherwise incur if they were operating their own networks. Operating a Project 25 radio networkcan require significant ongoing investments because of the large amount of maintenance and support this type of

network requires. Typically, owning a Project 25 network causes an agency to incur a wide range of support costs, asshown in this example.

Standard Support Item Typical Annual Cost

Site Lease Costs $480,000

Telco (T1) Lease Costs $72,000

Utility Costs $36,000

Generator Fuel Costs $3.600

Headcount Costs $132,000

Preventative Maintenance(Test Generators, Inspect Grounding, Examine Equipment)

$7,200

Onsite Response Services $19,200

Extended Warranty $78.000

Software Subscription Agreements $250,000

Remote Monitoring $12,000

Security Updates $12,000

When you join the STARCOM21 network, the cost of maintaining and supporting the system is incurred by Motorola asthe network owner, significantly reducing your TCO.



First-response organizations trust Motorola to deliver technology that’s second nature — seamlessly connecting usersto real-time information and allowing them to focus on the mission, not the technology. Public safety organizations

around the world trust Motorola to securely design, integrate, support, operate and manage essential communicationsnetworks.

STARCOM21 ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING

STARCOM21 provides the opportunity to apply for funding from both state and federal resources. The State of Illinoishas received over $50 million in federal grants to enable interoperability with multiple state agencies. The STARCOM21

network meets the criteria for federal homeland security initiatives and federal mandates for communications grants.

For more information on obtaining federal grants for your agency, visit our Simple Guide to Funding Resources site.

https://communities.motorola.com/community/govgrants/

General Subject 1.1.1 Page 1 of 3

Subject: MPSCS Fee Structure

Date Issued or Revised: November 04, 2011

Date Review: November 04, 2012

1.1.1 Fee Structure

I. Subject and Purpose

This document defines the application of fees to voice radio users of the Michigan’s

Public Safety Communications System (MPSCS).

II. Procedures and Guidelines

The following yearly fees will be applied to voice and data services used on the MPSCS:

Voice - System Access Fees:

Service Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Full

Mobile, Portable, Control Station,

Consolette voice fee

0 $50 $100 $200

PSAP Console/Control Station

( Full Member Agency )

N/A N/A N/A $0

Talkgroups: Event 1 - 30

(Non-Law Enforcement)

Incl. Incl. Incl. Incl.

Talkgroups: Event 31 -45

(Law Enforcement only)


Talkgroups EMMD 1-8

(with MSP’s EMD written

approval)


Dynamic Regroup Incl. Incl. Incl. Incl.

Request Event Talkgroups No Yes Yes Yes

I-Call / I-TAC Yes Yes Yes Yes

Statewide 1-8 No Incl. Incl. Incl.

Additional System Talkgroups None 1 to 8 1 to 16 Unlimited

Template/Archive annual rewrite N/A Fee Fee Incl.

Data - System Access Fees:

Service Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Full

DATA Service Fee

(PMDC - IV&D)

$600 $600 $600 $600





A majority of the member's radios must be at the Level 2 or above to request Event talkgroup

activation.

A local emergency management program recognized under PA 390 may request Event

Talkgroups for interoperable communications during emergency events regardless of the Service

Level of the responding agencies.

All of a member’s radios within a Level will be grouped together and used to determine the

average PTT and Voice Talk Time for a year. If the average determines the radio Service Level

was exceeded, a review will be conducted during the next billing cycle to determine the

individual radios exceeding the Level during the previous 12 months and those will be

reassigned to the next Level.

This fee provides MPSCS system services on the MPSCS in accordance with normal MPSCS

activities. Invoices are issued on April 1 and October 1. The April 1 invoice provides for

service between and including April 1 to September 30. The October 1 invoice provides for

service between and including October 1 and March 31. Radios initialized between invoicing

periods will be prorated on a monthly basis to fall in line with the normal invoice cycles.

In the event a radio is lost or stolen; the fees will remain in effect for the current 6-month

interval. The user may request the NCC to disable the radio ID for security purposes but keep

the individual radio account active.

There is no charge to terminate the account for a radio.

If the user requests the account for the radio terminated and later the radio is reactivated, the

$5.00 initialization fee will be reassessed and may result in a new ID and Archive for the radio.

RCM terminals connected to the system do not incur a fee.

There is no charge for programming Consoles or RCM login profiles.

Non OTAR (Over the Air Rekeying) agency specific encryption keys are not provided nor

maintained by the MPSCS.





Template / Archive / Programming Fees:

Use existing State Defined Template ( i.e.; EMD / Interoperability) N/C

Build Master Template per radio model $100

Build Radio Archive per radio ( 1st system in radio) $5

Build Radio Archive per radio ( 2nd system in radio) $25

Initial programming per radio $5

Radios at the full system access fee level may request a single yearly Template/Archive re-write

as necessary to modify or update talkgroups due to agreements with adjacent agencies, business

plans or other requirements. Radios at fee level 1, 2 or 3 do not receive a yearly

Template/Archive re-write without additional fees. Additional or new Templates will result in a

Template fee.

III. Responsible Party

A. Contact for Questions

The contact information for billing questions is:

Michigan’s Public Safety Communications System

4000 Collins Rd.

Lansing, MI 48909

Attention: Billing Clerk

(517) 336-6240

E-mail: [email protected]

IV. Applicable Forms

The MPSCS User Agreement is the contract between an agency and the State of

Michigan to request service and agreement to pay the fees. This agreement is available at

www.michigan.gov/mpscs

V. Termination or Review Date

The Director of MPSCS is responsible for review and update of this policy.

VI. Linkages to Other Relevant Data

A

PMPL

AP

PUBLIFI

PPE

BLICCAT

B

END

C SATIO

BILL

DIX D

AFEN S

L

D

ETY SYSTTEMM

“PROFESSIONALS PUTTING GOOD IDEAS TO WORK”



APPENDIX D PUBLIC SAFETY AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM BILL Article II: Public Safety Radio Amplification System [Added 7-18-2006 by Bill No. 2006-6] § 117-8 Purpose; general; certificate of occupancy. A. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to establish minimum standards to insure a reasonable degree of reliability for emergency services communications from within buildings and structures within the county to and from emergency communications centers. B. General. Except as otherwise provided, no person shall maintain, own, erect or construct any building or structure or any part thereof or cause the same to be done which fails to support adequate radio coverage for emergency service workers, including but not limited to firefighters and law enforcement officers. C. A certificate of occupancy may not be issued for any building or structure which fails to comply with the requirements contained in this section. A contractor or owner of any building or structure seeking a certificate of occupancy must present the Department of Planning, Zoning and Community Development a written letter from the Department of Emergency Services ("DES") or a DES form stating approval of the project, before any certificate of occupancy is issued. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15; 12-18-2012 by Bill No. 2012-13] § 117-8.1 Definitions. [Added 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: OWNER

Any person owning the building at issue or a person the owner designates to represent him or her in these matters.

§ 117-9 Adequate radio coverage. A. Descriptively, "adequate coverage" means the ability for emergency services personnel to transmit into the building an intelligible voice signal that may be heard; the ability to receive an intelligible voice signal transmitted and originating from within the building; and, the ability to transmit and receive intelligible voice signals among emergency personnel who are within the building. B. For purposes of this section, adequate radio coverage shall include all of the following: (1) A minimum signal strength of minus 95 dbm available in 90% of the area of each floor of the building when transmitted from the dispatch communications system of the emergency personnel; (2)




A minimum signal strength of minus 95 dbm received at the dispatch communications system of the emergency personnel when transmitted from 90% of the area of each floor of the building; (3) The frequency range which must be supported shall be as determined by the Wicomico County Department of Emergency Services ("DES"). The Wicomico County Department of Planning, Zoning and Community Development is responsible for notifying the contractor, owner, or submitting party of the need to contact the DES regarding plan submittal to the DES for approval of the system. The DES will notify the Department of Planning, Zoning and Community Development after review, as to whether the plan is approved or not approved. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15; 12-18-2012 by Bill No. 2012-13] (4) A reliability factor of 90%. C. When measuring the performance of a bidirectional amplifier, signal strength measurements are based on one input signal adequate to obtain a maximum continuous operating output level. D. Industry standard DAQ definitions are shown in Table 1. DAQ Level 3 is commonly specified as the minimum performance level for public safety systems.

§ 117-10 Amplification systems allowed. A. Buildings and structures which cannot support the required level of radio coverage as determined by the Wicomico County Department of Emergency Services ("DES") shall be equipped with any of the following in order to achieve the required adequate radio coverage: [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] (1) A radiating cable system; or (2)

Table 1

Delivered Audio Quality (DAQ) Delivered Audio Quality Subjective Performance Description 1 Unusable, speech present but unreadable 2 Understandable with considerable effort; frequent repetition due to

noise/distortion 3 Speech understandable with slight effort; occasional repetition required

due to noise/distortion 3.5 Speech understandable with repetition only rarely required; some

noise/distortion. 4 Speech easily understood; occasional noise/distortion 4.5 Speech easily understood; infrequent noise/distortion 5 Speech easily understood




An internal multiple antenna system with or without FCC-accepted bidirectional amplifiers as needed. B. If any part of the installed system(s) contain(s) an electrically powered component, the system shall be capable of operating on an independent battery and/or generator system for a period of at least 12 hours without external power input. The battery system shall automatically charge in the presence of an external power input. The amplification system, if powered, will be monitored by the building fire alarm system. If the system shifts to auxiliary power as stated above, the building fire alarm system will indicate trouble for that dedicated zone. If used, bidirectional amplifiers shall include filters to reduce adjacent frequency interference at least minus 35 db below the NPSPAC band. The filters shall be tuned to the MHz range determined in accordance with § 117-4B(3). Other settings may be used, provided that they do not attenuate the NPSPAC frequencies and further provided that they are not more than one MHz from the NPSPAC frequencies. C. In the event that a signal booster is employed, it shall be fully encased within a NEMA 4 (or equivalent) dust/waterproof case. § 117-11 Testing procedure. A. Acceptance testing. Officials from the Wicomico County Department of Emergency Services ("DES") or police or fire personnel of this jurisdiction may require tests to ensure sufficient overall two-way coverage within the building, including all areas located below grade as evidence of compliance with this Code. Tests are to be performed in the presence of said county personnel at no expense to this jurisdiction. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] B. Annual tests. When an in-building radio system is required, the building owner shall test all active components of the system, including but not limited to amplifiers, power supplies and backup batteries, a minimum of once every 12 months. Amplifiers shall be tested to ensure that the gain is the same as it was upon initial installation and acceptance. Backup batteries and power supplies shall be tested under load for a period of one hour to verify that they will properly operate during an actual power outage. If within the one-hour test period, in the opinion of the testing technician, the battery exhibits symptoms of failure, the test shall be extended for additional one-hour periods until the testing technician confirms the integrity of the battery. All other active components shall be checked to determine that they are operating within the manufacturer's specifications for the intended purpose. C. Five-year tests. In addition to the annual test, the building owner shall perform a radio coverage test a minimum of once every five years to ensure that the radio system continues to meet the requirements of the original acceptance test. The procedure set forth above shall apply to such tests. D.




Field tests. Police or fire personnel, or personnel from DES, after providing reasonable notice to the owner or his representative, shall have the right to enter onto the property to conduct field testing to be certain the required level of radio coverage is present. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] E. Qualifications of testing personnel. All tests shall be conducted, documented and signed by a person in possession of: (1) A current FCC license; or (2) A current technician certification issued by the Associated Public-Safety Communications Officials International (APCO); or (3) The Personal Communications Industry Association (PCIA); or (4) By a qualified member of the police or emergency services personnel. F. Retention of records. All test records shall be retained on the inspected premises by the building owner and a copy submitted to DES. DES may enter onto the property to inspect the records maintained. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] § 117-12 Exemptions. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] This article shall not apply to: buildings or structures owned by the State of Maryland, including public schools, universities, colleges, and community colleges; single-family residences of less than 5,000 square feet in residential districts that are not put to commercial or institutional use; any building constructed of wood frame; any building 35 feet high or less; as long as none of the aforementioned buildings make use of any metal construction or any underground storage or parking areas. For purposes of this section, parking structures and stairwells are included in the definition of "building" and stair shafts are included in the definition of “all parts of a building” but elevators may be excluded. § 117-13 Waiver of standards. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15] The requirements of this article may be lessened upon a written request of the owner when unique or unusual circumstances exist within a building or structure which make full compliance with the article practically infeasible. Upon a review of the application by county staff, including the Wicomico County Department of Emergency Services ("DES"), Fire Chief, and Police Chief and their determination that said circumstances exist, to merit a lower standard of compliance without sacrificing the general intent of the article, a written waiver will be issued detailing the permissible variances. DES shall notify the building official and owner in writing of any waiver granted. § 117-14 Violations. [Amended 12-1-2009 by Bill No. 2009-15]




Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a civil infraction and, upon conviction thereof, a citation will be issued and the person shall be fined in a sum not to exceed $500 for each offense, and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues to occur. The following officials from the Wicomico County Department of Emergency Services are authorized to issue citations for violations of this article: Director, Deputy Director and the Radio Systems Manager. § 117-15 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this article shall for any reason be held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this article.

M

IGR

AP

RATIPR

PPE

IONROG

END

N ASGRA

DIX E

SSUAMS

E

RANS

NCEE

WHITE PAPERMIGRATION ASSURANCE PLANNING

providing first responders and other professionals with the very latest in high-tech performance, reliability and security. For public safety organiza-tions of all sizes, this new approach can be a formidable challenge.

LEVERAGING STRATEGIC SOLUTIONSWhat if you could get expert help in selecting the best migration strategy for your specific goals? What if you could leverage industry leading network designers to help you get maximum benefit out of your investment? What if you could build a sustainable funding model for managing and operating your networks? What if you could assure guaranteed services levels? What if you could simplify your migration to an IP-based network with a comprehensive program that provides the ideal strategy, the right technology and a predictable, cost-saving funding model? Ultimately, what if you could focus on your mission instead of your technology?

In answer to these questions, a growing number of agencies are seeking to leverage comprehensive migration and management assurance solutions to help them plan and deploy their optimum radio network of the future.

MAKING COMPLEXITY MANAGEABLE

IP-centric networks represent a major change from traditional LMR networks. In the IP world, rapidly evolving technologies, functionalities and applications demand more proactive operations management. That’s why many public safety agencies are looking for solutions that make the transition smoother, faster and less costly. They need multi-faceted solutions that provide leading- edge technology, network planning and design, targeted operational per for - mance levels and predictable funding over multiple years, resulting in reliable public safety networks that are always ready in the moments that matter.

A NEW MIND-SETBased on APCO Project25 standards, these IP-based networks not only require new technology, they basically demand a new mind-set. In the IP space, public safety agencies need to take more of an IT-centric approach to network planning, deployment and management. Fast changing tech-nologies, functionalities and applications necessitate that more focus be placed on the integration and life cycle concerns of potentially thousands of individual components that make up the P25 operating environment. It’s an approach that enables agencies to keep their networks on the leading edge,

For most public safety agencies, transitioning from circuit-based LMR networks to complex APCO P25 systems is as challenging as it is inevitable. To simplify and optimize the transition, agencies are searching for migration, operations and funding solutions matched to their own individual environments and requirements. They need comprehensive management strategies that enable them to maintain optimum system performance and interoperability, while adapting to evolving standards, changing technologies and shifting end-user performance expectations.

SIMPLIFYING P25 NETWORK MIGRATION, MANAGEMENT AND FUNDING

RADIO NETWORKS ARE LOOKING AT MIGRATION STRATEGIES FOR FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES

50+% COUNTIES REPORT A BUDGET DEFICIT

65%

DEB

T

MISSION CRITICAL AGENCIES REPORT THEY ARE NOT WELL PREPARED TO IMPLEMENT THEIR TECHNOLOGY VISION

90+%

1


The IP-centric public safety networks of today and tomorrow are a great deal more complex than traditional LMR systems. P25 systems are continually evolving. The good news is that the networks are able to leverage a steady stream of new and innovative technologies and applications that enhance first responder effectiveness and community safety. The not-so-good news is that, because the systems are more complex, they’re also less predictable for network owners.

STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITYThe most successful IP public safety networks never remain static. The accelerated pace of innovation in the IP world places a premium on network flexibility. To optimize your P25 operations, you need to take timely advantage of the steady stream of new technology and applications that help maximize network value. The right migration and management solutions will design hardware and software flexibility into your system, ensuring your ability to support, maintain, enhance and expand your net-work over time. The program will not only focus on the LMR infrastructure, subscriber devices, accessories, provisioning, security and applications; it also should take into consideration the entire LMR operating environment, including civil, backup power, backhaul and more. This will provide you with the peace of mind that your network will operate flawlessly when you need it most. Equally important, you’ll have a guaranteed view of your cost structure for years to come.

NO SURPRISES: PREDICTABLE P25 NETWORK MIGRATION, MANAGEMENT AND FUNDING

NETWORK COMPONENTS

P25 CORE NETWORK

END-USER SERVICES

SYSTEM UPGRADES

ENHANCED FEATURES

CONFIGURATION CHANGES

REDUNDANCY & HARDENING

CONSOLE UPGRADES

BACKHAUL ENHANCEMENTS

COVERAGE & CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS

SITE/CIVIL ENHANCEMENTS

STATION UPGRADES

SITE RECONFIGURATIONS

SUBSCRIBER REFRESH

ACCESSORIES REFRESH

USER GROUP ADMINISTRATION

PROVISIONING MANAGEMENT

PROVISIONING MANAGEMENT

SUPPORT &SECURITYENHANCED OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

SECURITY

APPLICATIONSVIDEO

3RD PARTY APPS

NEW FEATURES AND APPLICATIONS

2

MIGRATION ASSURANCE SERVICES

NETWORK PLANNING

SYSTEM UPGRADE AGREEMENTS

NETWORK MONITORING SERVICE

PERFORMANCE REPORTING

MANAGEMENT OF USER CONFIGURATIONS & ACCESS

DATABASE ADMINISTRATION

ASSET MANAGEMENT

COMPLETE NETWORK OPERATIONS

ONE-OF-A-KIND NETWORKSIn the IP world, there’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all system. With the availability of such a large and constantly expanding portfolio of technology and applications, your P25 network will need to be customized to match your specific communication requirements. Your migration and management solution should be designed to help you plan, deploy and support the best possible network for your organization in the most cost effective manner possible. You want the engagement to be a collaborative effort, that includes your administrators and end users, to design, implement, manage and maintain a network that best meets your operational, migration and expansion goals.

PHASED IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN EXECUTION3RD PARTY & MOTOROLAMULTI-YEAR, MULTI PHASE

MONITORPERFORMANCE

MIGRATION PERFORMANCENETWORK PERFORMANCE

COLLABORATIVEPLANNING

MIGRATIONS &ENHANCEMENTS

TECHNOLOGYREFRESH

PERFORMANCEANALYSIS

MUTUAL NETWORK PLANNINGTCO ANALYSISRISK ANALYSISLIFECYCLE STRATEGY

REVIEW & ADJUSTNETWORK STRATEGY

OPERATIONS STRATEGYFUNDING STRATEGY


Successful management of an IP-based public radio system demands more than new technology and equipment. As you migrate your traditional LMR network to an IP-centric P25 system—or plan for the future of your existing IP communications network—your vision and strategy need to evolve as much as your technology. Why? With IP radio technology continuing to evolve at such a rapid pace, your new network will be more complex, more dynamic and more challenging to plan and manage. As a result, you’ll need a proactive, hands-on management approach, such as that provided by a comprehensive, lifecycle management-driven solution.

LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENTLifecycle management planning is a collaborative process in which your stakeholders and solutions provider experts jointly develop a long-term vision for system growth, enhancements and technology refreshes. Agencies should be looking for an innovative lifecycle management-based program that provides a customized continuum of planned investment, upgraded technology and predictable spending.

ASSURING OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE

RATE OF REFRESH

ANTI-VIRUS UPDATE SECURITY PATCHESMOTOROLA

APPLICATION SOFTWARE UPDATE

WEEKLY MONTHLY ANNUALLY 2-4 YEARS 3-5 YEARS 7-10 YEARS 10-15 YEARS

COMPUTING HARDWARE

VERSION REFRESH

NETWORKING HARDWARE

VERSION REFRESH

CONSOLES, SUBSCRIBERS,

BACKHAUL

STATIONS, TOWERS,

SHELTERS, GENERATORS

3

TECHNOLOGY REFRESHIn the face of continuous technology change, a customized lifecycle approach helps ensure your ability to plan and control spending, and guarantee performance levels over a multi-year time frame. Most important, it will help assure that your community is continually served and protected using the newest, most up-to-date technology and applications available. It will enable you to continually refresh your assets to empower first responders and safeguard citizens with the best, most innovative public safety equipment, functionalities and applications.

CUSTOMIZED MIGRATIONCollaboration is crucial. Your solution provider should work closely with you to establish a customized migration program based entirely on your specific needs. The solution should include regular reviews and provide the ability to adjust the program at least annually. In the long run, a lifecycle management approach helps you shift operational risk to the vendor partner while maintaining peak network performance. It will also offer you the assurance of predictability, allowing you to optimize spending over the next five-to-seven years or more.


THE POWER OF PREDICTABILITYMany agencies are seeking the assistance of network design experts to build a sustainable, predictable, guaranteed network funding model for migrating and managing IP-based radio networks. By eliminating the variable, unpredictable capital spending profile faced by public safety radio network operators, these solutions help ensure delivery of maximum performance while providing predictable spending over the life of the engagement.

TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPThe fundamental deliverable of a migration and management solution is an operational business plan and system-specific technology roadmap contract. This includes annual guaranteed, fixed cost for product updates, system expansions and future feature enhancements, along with high-level imple-mentation and management plans jointly created and based on your input.

Public safety agencies are seeing solutions that assist with migration, management and funding strategies and much more. These solutions offer an efficient, cost-effective way to meet your ongoing needs for technology change today, and over time. They help you successfully migrate to, or manage an existing IP based radio network. They will enable you to build an operating-style funding structure that ensures predictability, eliminates surprises and lets you control your network evolution in terms of migrations, operations, upgrades and expansion.

Bottom line, comprehensive P25 migration and management solutions allow you to focus on your mission, and not your technology.

Changes in funding availabilities for public safety projects create an increasing need for a program that supports predictable planning and accommodates long-term strategic investment optimization. That’s why it’s no surprise that assuring predictability in system architecture and funding strategies is high on the list of most P25 network operators and managers.

NO SURPRISESToday’s public safety agencies want P25 migration and management solutions designed to help reduce or eliminate inconvenient and costly surprises in both system architecture and funding plans. They help you avoid unexpected expenses, unplanned service interruptions and unforeseen security vulnerabilities. In addition, they provide a predictable spending path that minimizes the need to request additional capital from decision makers and/or search for new funding sources.

FLEXIBILITY IS KEYYour optimum P25 migration and management solution should provide a level spending effort over time, with no financing charges. The plan should be reviewed annually, giving you the flexibility to modify your network over the years, enabling you to adjust to changes in business priorities, technologies, standards requirements, environmental regulations and the political environment. It should also give you the flexibility to include other services, such as maintenance, system upgrade agreements and the possibility of outsourcing a variety of operations functions and activities. Equally important, your solution should allow you to conform to virtually any financial purchasing model.

PREDICTABILITY IN PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING

Motorola Solutions, Inc. 1301 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 U.S.A. motorolasolutions.com MOTOROLA, MOTO, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS and the Stylized M Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC and are used under license. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2013 Motorola, Inc. All rights reserved. RO-99-2283

CAPITAL PURCHASE MODEL

Motorola’s Migration Assurance Program (MAP) offers comprehensive P25 network migration, management and cost saving funding strategies and solutions matched to individual customer environments. For more information, visit motorolasolutions.com/MAP

ESTABLISH A MOREPREDICTABLE IT SPEND MODEL

MANAGED MODEL

http://www.motorolasolutions.com/MAP



W Fina icomi l Rep ico Co port ounty y - Wicomico County

Documents

Transcript of W Fina icomi l Rep ico Co port ounty y - Wicomico County