Vidvanmukhabhūṣaṇam - A unique work on the Mahābhāṣya
Transcript of Vidvanmukhabhūṣaṇam - A unique work on the Mahābhāṣya
Sowmya Krishnapur
PhD Scholar, University of Madras
16th World Sanskrit Conference
Bangkok, 28 June – 02 July 2015
The text
Manuscripts
Author
Notable points
Critique of the work
Contents
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 2
Mahābhāṣya-vidvanmukhabhūṣaṇam
Viduṣāṃ mukhānāṃ/mukheṣu bhūṣaṇam =
alaṅkārabhūtam
Ślokas summing up the siddhānta of the vyākaraṇa
mahābhāṣya
An attempt to illustrate the siddhānta with an example
from everyday life
Vidvanmukhabhūṣaṇam
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 3
śiṣṭā eva na kintu
grāhyaṁ kṣudhitārthimātramiha dātrā । annasyādaijmātramivādaicchabdena
vṛddhisaṁjñāyām ॥(śloka 1 – vṛddhirādaic)
Śiṣṭāḥ = śāstreṇa vihitāḥ, sadācārasampannāḥ śrotriyāḥ
Sample 1
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 4
Munirnakāramuccārya
sarvanāmapade yathā|
Ṇatvaṃ vārayati prāptaṃ
tathā lubdho vanīpakam ||
(śloka 47 – sarvādīni sarvanāmāni)
Nakāraḥ - ‘na’ iti varṇaḥ, nirākaraṇam
Sample 2
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 5
1+96 verses
Adhyāya 1 – pāda 1
No indications of the author attempting this for the
rest of the mahābhāṣya
Probably his focus was on the navāhnika, which is
the most-often studied portion of the Mahābhāṣya
Extent of the text
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 6
Āhnika Number of verses
Maṅgalam 1
3 (1.1.1 – 1.1.3) 12
4 (1.1.4 – 1.1.10) 15
5 (1.1.11 – 1.1.26) 18
6 (1.1.27 – 1.1.44) 17
7 (1.1.45 – 1.1.55) 15
8 (1.1.56 – 1.1.59) 5
9 (1.1.60 – 1.1.75) 14
Total 97
Extent
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 7
Each verse followed by auto-commentary in simple
prose
The commentary gives a concise summary of the
pūrvapakṣa-siddhānta as per the bhāṣya, and
proceeds to explain the meaning of the verse
Extremely useful for students to get a quick
understanding of the debate
Structure of the text
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 8
Source Material ffs Script Condition
A1 Adyar Library and
Research Center
(29.A.15)
Palm-leaf 89 Telugu Complete,
Slightly
damaged
M1 GOML, Chennai
(R1651)
Paper 76 Telugu Complete,
Good
M2 GOML, Chennai
(R1665)
Paper 43 Telugu Complete,
Good
Manuscripts
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 9
Prayāga veṅkaṭādri bhaṭṭa
No information regarding the author available in the
colophons/text
Based on internal evidence, it is proposed that he could
have been from the Andhra-region, and lived in the 17th
century
Vedānta-vidvanmukhabhūṣaṇam
Author
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 10
Does not offer independent interpretations/
conclusions – stays true to the stated objective of
summarising the siddhānta of the mahābhāṣya
Confines himself almost exclusively to the
statements of vārttika – bhāṣya
Reveres the bhāṣyakāra – bhagavān
Does criticise his arguments as “prauḍhivāda”
Grammatical analysis - 1
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 11
Minimal quotations from other works
The only other vaiyākaraṇa referred to often is
kaiyaṭa (twice by name, and eight times by his
commentary)
Refers to vṛttaratnākara, āpastamba sūtra, nyāsa,
vivaraṇa (all just once), and annambhaṭṭa (twice)
Significant – No mention of Bhaṭṭojī ḍīkṣita or
Nāgeśa bhaṭṭa
Grammatical analysis - 2
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 12
Only one case in the whole text, where the author
discusses different interpretations, and offers his
thoughts on what is right (antaraṃ
bahiryogopasaṃvyānayoḥ - 1.1.36)
Displays special skill in summing up the arguments
of the bhāṣya – key words, clear sentences, easy
flow
Manuscript evidence for two versions of the text,
refined by the author
Grammatical analysis - 3
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 13
A peek into the life of a scholar in the 17th century
Livelihood based on the generosity of donors
Paucity of donors, necessity to prove one’s worth,
harassment at the hands of fools posing as scholars,
petty palace politics…
Social analysis - 1
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 14
Recurring themes in examples
Donors supporting scholars, earning money and
power – 14 verses
Palace affairs and intrigues – 12 verses
Servants, their selection, their nature – 12 verses
Family – 9 verses
Scholars/Fools – 7 verses
Scholarly debates – 4 verses
Social analysis - 2
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 15
Except the maṅgala-śloka, no mention of
God/religion/devotion
Mention of vaidika vidyā only as a means to ensure
dāna
No mention of a specific donor/king – no political
pressure to praise?
Teaching students the way to survive?
Familiarity with Islam – clothes that the women wear
Social analysis - 3
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 16
A refreshing way of presenting śāstric concepts
Extremely useful for students who are studying
Mahābhāṣya – summary and tool to remember
Also useful for scholars presenting arguments in
vākyārtha – probably envisioned by the author
Critique - Usefulness
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 17
Objective of the work does not allow for any
significant/original contribution to the field
Does not cover all the aspects discussed in the
bhāṣya – omissions more in latter parts of the text
Critique - Grammatical
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 18
Admirable use of śleṣa
Not a natural poet – some of the associations appear
far-fetched
Repetitive themes/monotonous
Critique - Poetic
28-06-2015 Sowmya Krishnapur 19