Tribimaximal mixing in neutrino mass matrices with texture zeros or vanishing minors
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO STONES IN NAGARPARKAR, SINDH ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO...
Transcript of VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO STONES IN NAGARPARKAR, SINDH ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO...
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
Introduction:
Nagarparkar is located in south-eastern
part of Tharparkar district in Sindh. It
joins marshy Rann of Kachchh in south.
The desert of Thar is so vast and gigantic
that its physiographic properties vary
markedly from one region to other.
Tharparkar is thus divided into nine parts
namely Kaerr Thar, Kantho Thar, Parkar
area, Samroti Thar, Wangho Thar, Wat,
Mohrano, Dhat and Achhro Thar
(Harijan 2005:1-12).The present study
was conducted in Parkar area of
Tharparkar. Parkar area consists of
southern portion of taluka Nagarparkar.
The outcrop of hills including Karunjhar
range covers quite a bit of this area. The
land is fertile and cultivable. Both
Muslims and Hindus inhabit in the
Nagarparkar taluka. Nagarparkar is rich
in terms of history, archaeology and
architecture.
While travelling in Nagarparkar,
one comes across many Jaina and Hindu
temples. Apart from Jain and Hindu
temples, the landscape of Nagarparkar is
dotted with memorial stones. These
memorial stones are objects of
veneration for Hindus living in the area.
Most of the memorial stones belong to
Sodha Rajputs who ruled over
Nagarparkar. The paper aims at
describing the crumbling condition of
free-standing memorial stones
commemorating satis and Jhujhars
(beheaded heroes) Prior to moving to
the discussion of memorial stones, it is
indispensable first to throw some light
on history of Sodhas since most of the
memorial stones in Nagarparkar are
related to them.
History of the Sodhas:
The Sodhas belonged to the Parmar
branch of Rajputs. Parmars are divided
into 35 branches, notably Soomras,
Sankla, Mori, Sagra, Rehar, Dhunda,
Pasra and Barkota (Ganguly 1933:24).
Dharni Brah, the Raja of Abu
(Rajasthan) in AD 1030, had two sons,
named Mahipal (alias Devraj) and
Bahar. Bahar had three sons, Sodho,
Sankhlo and Bagh, it was from the line
of the first two (Sodho and Sankhlo) that
the Sodha and Sankhla tribes were
created, respectively while the third son,
Bagh, died without producing a tribe to
carry his name ( Solanki 2004, 19).
After the death of Dharni Brah
(alias Charrai) in AD 1070, his elder son
Mahipal became the Raja of Abu. Bahar
left Abu and settled in Radhanpur. His
eldest son, Sodho, captured Ratokot in
AD 1125, which was then under the
suzerainty of the Soomra Rajputs. Sodho
and his son Chachak lived in Ratokot
and consolidated many neighbouring
villages. The Sodhas became known as
Ranas in Ratokot (Harijan 2005,
Solanki, 2004,),
Rano Raj Dev, son of Chachak
Dev, was a brave ruler in the family of
the Sodhas. He began to plot the attack
and capture of Umarkot from the
Soomras. In forming his strategy, he sent
his court poets, Junfah Charan and
Budhiman Charan, to prepare the ground
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
232
for attack. They went to Umarkot and
lived there for some time before
returning to Ratokot. After deliberations
with both poets, Rano Raj Dev launched
his invasion (Harijan 2005).
In AD 1226, a battle ensued
between the armies of Khenhro Soomro
and Rano Raj Dev Sodho. Many people
were killed on both sides. However, the
Soomras lost the battle to the Sodhas and
retreated to Deeplo. Raj Dev Sodho
established his rule in Umarkot and was
known to have been the real founder of
the Sodha dynasty. He was a chivalrous
and daring ruler. After the conquest of
Umarkot, the Sodhas began to capture
parts of Mithi, Chelhar, Chacharo, and
they extended their sway upto
Nagarparkar. Four generations of the
Sodhas ruled and lived in Umarkot, after
which Darabursh, the ruler of Umarkot,
dived his state between his two sons
Darjanshal (alias Darjan Singh) and
Aasrai. He gave Umarkot and adjoining
areas to his elder son Darjanshal and
Nagarparkar to the younger son, Aasrai
(op. cit. pp. 41-42). The descendents of
Aasrai namely Devraj, Sukarjee,
Khangarjee, Arjanjee, Bhemjee,
Bakharjee, Gangojee and Akhojee ruled
over Nagarparkar (Ojha 1998). After
Akhojee the Sodhas of Nagarparkar
came to be called Akha Sodha. The
Akha Sodha, Mano Singh Sodha and
Nanda Sodha divided Nagarparkar into
twelve small states (kothri). Apart from
Sodhas, Makwana and Seendal Rajputs
also ruled over Nagarparkar for brief
periods. Sabusan served as capital of
Seendal Rajputs during the rule over
Nagarparkar. Barring Makwana Rajputs,
we find the memorial stones of the rulers
of Sodha and Seendal Rajputs in
different villages of Nagarparkar. The
main reason of discussing the history of
Sodha and Seendal Rajputs was that they
played very important role in socio-
political history of Nagarparkar. The role
of Makwana Rajput was not significant
and their brief stay in Nagarparkar added
nothing to the landscape of Nagarparkar
so far as the monuments are concerned.
However, the monuments of the Sodha
and Seendal (only in two villages) are
scattered throughout landscape.
Historical Background:
Memorial stones are erected for men
who died in battle or who met with an
unnatural death and for Satis who
immolated themselves either on the
funeral pyre of their husbands or on
hearing of the death of their husbands in
battle. The cult of sati and hero worship
is prevalent and widespread in
Nagarparkar.
According to the well-known
classical Hindu myth, Sati, the wife of
Shiva, committed suicide because her
father had insulted her husband. Though
there are different versions of the myth,
the principal one holds that she did so by
throwing herself into a sacrificial fire.
Her name, Sati, is the feminine form of
Sanskrit adjective sat (true) and the word
sati came to be applied specifically to
the widow who immolated herself on her
husband‟s funeral pyre (Noble and
Sankhyan 2001:343). The rite of Sati is
of uncertain origin and appears to have
developed in India during the post-Vedic
period. Though there are instances of
Sati in classical epics (Walker 1968: II,
461), Sati as a voluntary act appears to
have slowly spread throughout India
from the third century AD onward and
became more prevalent and popular after
the eighth century AD (Chattopadhay
1975). Thereafter, sacred works
increasingly advocated the rite as
religious duty for women and a way by
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
233
which the wife might even ensure
salvation for both her dead husband and
herself (Altekar 1962:115-142, Thakur
1963:163-184).
The worship of the dead as
heroes on the basis of memorial stones
as well as the deification of human
beings and their continued existence as
„little‟ gods and goddesses is well
documented in the literature on Indian
religion ( Blackburn 1985,Thapar 1981).
It is said that if person dies a violent or
premature death, he or she is unable to
become an ancestor. In these cases, the
person becomes another kind of
supernatural entity ranging from
malevolent spirits to different sorts of
heroes and deified beings. Like
ancestors, these entities also have to be
appeased and worshipped, but in
different ways. Whereas ancestors are
remembered after the second or third
generation as a collective body (Knipe
1977), persons who die a violent death
are remembered individually. The
personal story of a hero or deified
human being will be remembered in the
form of a text, which can be either a hero
stone (Thapar 1981) or epic text which is
recited and performed during states of
possession (Blackburn 1985).
Meaning, Symbols and Motifs:
To the local Hindu population these
stones are objects of worship. These
sacred stones are frequented by people
on a number of occasions, when
marriages take place, when a new born
child is named and fed his first solid
food, when the baby‟s hair is cut or ears
pierced, etc.
The stelae of Sati, Mahasati and
Satimata are dominant media of visual
culture of Tharparkar in general and
Nagarparkar in particular. People
frequently visit the memorial stone of
Phool Bai Sati (Fig.1, Plate 1) at old
Mondaro. The Chhands (folk poetry) of
Phool Bahi Sati is popular in
Nagarparkar. These Chhands are recited
by Maganhars and Charan communities
respectively.
The shrine of Mahasati (Great
Sati) is located in a small village of
Mithrio Charan in Chachro tehsil. Hindu
community of Nagarparkar goes to pay
respects to Jhoma Sati. Jhoma Sati
belonging to Charan community
committed self-immolation in Mithario
Charan to stop the atrocities of Balochis
who frequently plundered her village.
She is worshipped by Hindu Charans of
Tharparkar. Apart from Charans, many
other Hindu castes notably Rebaris of
Nagarparkar, Menghwars, Bhils,
Suthahars, Sonaras, and Rajputs worship
Jhoma Sati (Fig.2, Plate 1). An annual
fair (in August) is held at the shrine of
Jhoma Sati in Mithario Charan. Jhoma
Sati is also worshipped in the Barmer
district of Rajasthan. She sacrificed her
life for the whole community. Later on
some of her descendents migrated to
Barmer, Rajasthan, where her cult is still
popular and widespread. According to
some Charans of Mithario Charan
village Jhoma hailed from Harvecha
village near Jaisalmer in Rajasthan.
The Hindu community also
worships the Kasu Ma Sati who is better
known as Satimata (Mother Sati). The
memorial stone of Kasu Ma is located
some five kilometers north-east of
Vejhiar in Islamkot. Kasu Ma immolated
herself with her son and became
Satimata (Mother Sati) in the eighteenth
century. She is the Kulsati (lineage Sati)
of Dohat Rathors of Tharparkar (Fig.3,
Plate 2). Legend has it that Kasu Ma
immolated herself with her son Harnath
Dohat Rathor Rajput. Harnath died in
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
234
battle. It was the custom among the
Rajputs that after the death of their
husbands women were supposed to be
immolated with their husbands on the
funeral pyre. Trial by fire was an act of
truth (sat). The woman proved her
satitva (sati-hood) by showing no
physical pain at the time of ordeal.
According to Hindu belief, the sat
protects the sati like an unguent, coating
or armour. Death on the pyre is
compared to the fire-bath agnisnan (fire-
bath) (Weinberger-Thomas 2000: 43).
When Harnath died in battle, his wife
who belonged to the Kelan lineage of the
Sodha Rajputs refused to become a Sati.
Her refusal to immolate herself with her
husband earned a bad name for her and
her caste the Kelan Sodha Rajputs.
According to Rajput traditions and
customs, it was a bad omen not to
become a sati. Instead, the mother of
Harnath, Kasu Ma decided to cremate
herself with her son and became
Satimata.
Two daughters of Kasu Ma,
namely, Chanda Bai and Phul Bai, also
became sati. Chanda Bai was married to
Sobha Singh Nara Sodha. She became
sati after her husband died while fighting
against cattle-rustlers. Chanda Bai took
her deceased husband in her arms and
immolated herself. The descendents of
Sobha Singh Naro Sodho reside in the
Pabuhar area of Mithi district where
Chanda Bai is venerated. In addition to
that, Phul Bai became a sati as well. Her
memorial stone, as mentioned above, is
located in the old Mondaro village in
Nagarparkar.
The local terms that are widely
used for the memorial stones in
Nagarparkar are Pariyo, Khambi and
Khatri. It is important to make a clear
distinction among these terms. The local
community uses pariyo only for the
memorial stone of a Jhujhar (headless
hero) who died in an act of heroism such
as defending a village against raiders or
cattle against cattle-lifters or who have
died on the battle-field. Such stones have
come to be called hero stones. Local
people call these hero stones Jhujhar Jo
Pario’. Whereas Sati stones are called
Sati Ji Khambhi or Sati ni Khambi in
Nagarparkar. And Khatri (memorial) is
erected in the honour of those: (1) who
died accidental deaths, (2) who were
murdered (3) and who were the
distinguished persons such as priests or
heads of villages (Shah 1982:110). Such
stones are located at Khanpur near
Nagarparkar town.
Pariyo:
Etymology has often been cited by
anthropologists as evidence for hidden
meanings (Hastrup 1995: 39). While
distinguishing between words and
etymology Lecercle argues that words
are the monuments on which our history
and our origin are inscribed and
etymology the device that enables us to
decipher the inscriptions (Lecercle 1990:
191).
There is in no consensus of
opinion on the exact derivation of the
word pariyo. According to one school of
thought, the word originated from the
Sanskrit noun pala meaning protector or
guardian, its context here being: he who
died to uphold or protect his code of
ethics. Thus pariyo is the vernacular
equivalent of the classical pala. Initially,
the pariyas or Paliyas must have
signified the commemorative stones of
those who died for a cause. In the course
of time, this specific definition faded
into a more general one, implying any
type of memorial stone (Doshi 1982:
165).Another school of thought claims
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
235
that the word pariyo or paliya comes
from the root pal, meaning to protect or
guard. The subscribers to this view argue
that, since it is we who look after the
stone-tablets of our forebears and offer
them worship, we are the protectors of
the memorial stones, hence pariya or
paliya indicates those that are protected
(Doshi: 165)
Khambi:
Another word that is used for memorials
in Nagarparkar is khambhi. Khambi is
erected for those who take their lives or
commit self-immolation. These
memorials are called khambis and not
pariyas even though they look alike. As
mentioned earlier, Pariyas are erected
only for those heroes who died in battle
or defending their villages or cattle,
whereas khambis are erected for those
who commited self- immolation or who
became Satis. Put differently, khambis
are erected for only Satis while Pariyas
for heroes (Jhujhars). One only hears
Sati ji Khambi not pariyo of Sati in
Nagarparkar.
It is believed that the word
khambi has come from the Sanskrit word
stambha meaning a column (Doshi
1982:170). Peter Maddock argues that
the word khambi is generally accepted as
deriving from the Sanskrit stambha and
its derivative khambha. Khambhas are a
type of menhir that date from Vedic
times or even earlier (Maddock
1993:107).
Meaning of Jhujhar:
It is an important to know about the
phenomena of Jhujhar. Jhujhars are the
warriors who continue to fight after they
are beheaded. According to Komal
Kothari, Jhujhar is a term which refers
to those people who die a violent death
and who later manifest themselves as
restless spirits (Bharucha 2003:130).
Drawing on local sources, Ann Grodzins
Gold (1989: pp.64-5) suggests that the
original meaning of Jhunjhar is a heroic
warrior who dies in battle (junjh, yuddh),
and whose spirit has not found release,
can no longer be taken literally in the
contemporary world where there are „no
wars‟. Lindsey Harlan argues that the
Jhumjhar may lose his head through
battle or palace intrigue. To die fighting
in not misfortunate, it is the goal of all
Rajput warriors. Nevertheless, to die of
decapitation whether on the battleground
or at home is degrading: it violates the
warrior‟s physical integrity, which is
inseparable from his moral integrity.
Such humiliation can be erased only by
revenge. As the abundance of sat
(goodness, character) enables the
jhunjhar to survive the loss of the head
long enough to avenge with interest the
insult paid him. Before dying he kills at
least a few, and perhaps many, enemies.
This revenge takes victory from the
hands of his slayers and immortalizes his
valor (Harlan 1994: 198).
Symbols and Motifs:
Memorial stones are divided into two
sections, the upper featuring a carved
motif and the lower bearing a brief
inscription. Mostly, the memorial stones
in Nagarparkar have carved on their
upper section representations of the sun
and the moon. The sun may be shown
with distinctive rays, and occasionally
has human face, while the moon may be
represented either full or crescent-
shaped and recumbent. The sun with a
human face is depicted on one of the
hero stones located at Khanpur near
Nagarparkar town (Fig.4 Plate 2). Local
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
236
people say that it means that, as long as
the sun and moon exist, these persons
will be remembered, thus symbolizing
eternity. The depictions of mor
(peacock) are also found on some of the
memorials particularly those located at
Qasibo and Mithi Veri villages. In
addition, one also finds the depictions of
peacock on the memorial stone of
Rawoji at old Mondaro (Fig.5 Plate-3).
Rawoji Sodho was the husband of Phool
Bai Sati whose memorial stone stands
close to Rawoji. Peacock representations
can also be found on many memorials
located at Sabusan, Kharerio, Sura
Chand, Ranpur, Oran Jo Wandhio and at
Bodhesar villages. The peacock is
symbol of beauty and prosperity and
associated with the Hindu conception of
maya (the illusory world of matter) and
thus is associated with the goddesses of
Hindu pantheon.
The depiction of lotus can also be
found on various hero and sati stones at
Bodhesar, Surya Chand, Barerai, new
Qasibo, old Qasibo, Ranpur, Mokrio,
Berani, Churio, Veekasar villages. The
lotus is symbol of prosperity and
fertility. Another symbol found on hero
and Sati stones is the right turning
Svastika. It is symbol of auspiciousness.
Still another symbol sculpted on many
memorials in Nagarparkar is the linga,
the phallic emblem associated with
Shiva. It symbolizes that the deceased
was a devotee of Shiva. One finds the
symbol of the linga on memorials
located at Sura Chand, Rana Sar, and
Hara Sar (Fig.6 Plate-3) villages.
The Sati may be depicted as
holding a water-pot in one hand and
rosary in the other, while on the others,
one only finds women holding water
pots. This symbolizes the spirituality and
righteousness. Such depictions are found
on Sati stones at Khanpur near
Nagarparkar town, old Qasibo, Bodhesar
(Fig.7, Plate-4), Mokrio and old
Mondaro villages.
The following motifs are found
on sati and hero stones in Nagarparkar.
A sati stone with depiction of holding
her husband in her arms
The motif of the sati holding her
deceased husband in her arms is found
on some stones. There is a sati stone
near the pond in Berani village which
shows a sati holding her deceased
husband in her arms (Fig.8, Plate-4).
Apart from that one also finds a similar
depiction on one of the sati stones at old
Qasibo.
A sati- stone with namaskar pose
The female figures are most often in
namaskara pose (two palms together),
which expresses devotion to attainment
of after-life and devotion to one‟s
husband. Such sati stones with the
depiction of namaskara pose are located
in various villages of Nagarparkar.
A sati- stone with raised arm
Sati-memorials may have depictions of a
plain arm or an arm loaded down with
wrist and upper-arm bangles. The
representations of raised arms loaded
with bangles are found on two of the sati
stones at old Qasibo (Fig.9, Plate-5).
One can also find on some memorials
the motif of raised arm either plain or
loaded with bangles and figure of sati
carved in front of an arm. There are two
such memorials in Nagarparkar carrying
the motif of raised arm and figure of sati
at Bodhesar and Khanpur near
Nagarparkar.
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
237
A sati stone with figures of both Sati
and her husband
There are some memorials which
contain the images of both Sati and her
husband on the same stone. The husband
is shown as a mounted warrior on
horseback and sati is depicted to his
right with namaskara pose, others are
either holding pot or carrying objects.
Such a motif can be found on one of the
memorial stones commemorating both
husband and wife at Khanpur near
Nagarparkar town (Fig.10, Plate-5).
A hero-stone with horse riders
A warrior with a sword and shield riding
on a horse is most frequently depicted on
hero stones in Nagarparkar. These hero
stones invariably belong to Rajputs. In
the topmost panel of the stone the sun on
the left and moon on the right are
invariably depicted. Some of the
memorial stones bearing the
representations of horse-riding warriors
are located in the villages of Adigam,
Ranpur, Feethapur, Churio, Berarai
(Fig.11,Plate-6), Sabusan (Fig.12, Plate-
6), Sabusan II, new Qasibo old Qasibo,
Mokrio, Harasar, Veeksar, etc.
A hero- stone with camel riders
Usually, the hero stones bear the relief of
a horse rider in Nagarparkar.
Nevertheless, one also comes across
hero stones depicting camel riders.
These stones unfailingly belong to the
Rabari community. One such hero stone
bearing a camel rider is located at
Sabusan (Fig.13, Plate-7). There are six
hero stones at Sabusan. Barring one, all
others depicting horse-riders belong to
Seendal Rajputs. Only one hero-stone
bears the relief of a camel rider and
belongs to Rabari. The Rabaris are
associated with camel breeding in
Nagarparkar. The camel is also the
vehicle of Mammai, the most popular
goddess of the Rabaris. Many temples of
the Mammai goddess exist in different
villages of Nagarparkar. However, the
most popular is situated at Chanida
village.
A hero-stone with two riders
When either two brothers or any two
members of the family die together in
battle, their memorial stones are erected
at one place. In this case, the hero-stone
depicts two horse riders together. Such
hero stones depicting two horse riders on
the same stone are located in the villages
of Sabusan, Surachand (Fig.14, Plate-7),
Churio (Fig.15, Plate-8) and Mithi Veri
(Fig.16, Plate-8).
References:
Altekar, A.S. 1962. The position of
Women in Hindu Civilization: from
Prehistoric to the Present day. third
ed. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.
Blackburn, Stuart H. 1985. „Death and
Deification: Folk Cults in Hinduism‟
History of Religion, 24, 3:255-274.
Bharucha, Rustom. 2003. Rajasthan: an
Oral History, Conversations with Komal
Kothari. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Bloch, Maurice. 1982. “Death, Women
and Power.” In Death and Regeneration
of Life, edited by Maurice Bloch and
Jonathan Parry, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 211-230.
Chattopadhyay, Aparna. 1975. “Position
of widows in Early Medieval India in the
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
238
Light of the Kathasaritsagara”. Journal
Oriental Institute, 24:393-402.
Gold, Ann Grodzins. 1988. The Fruitful
Journeys: The Ways of Rajasthan
Pilgrims, Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Doshi, Saryu. 1982. „Paliyas of
Saurasthra’. In Memorial stones: a
Study of their Origin, Significance and
Variety, edited by S. Settar and Gunther
D. Sontheimer. New Delhi: Institute of
Indian Art, Karnatak University,
Dharwad and South Asia Institute,
University of Heidelberg, Germany,
157-173.
Gandhi, Raj S. 1997. Sati as Altruistic
Sucide. Contributions to Asian Studies,
X, 141-157.
Ganguly, D.C. 1933. History of the
Paramara Dynasty, Dacca: The
University of Dacca.
Hardgrove, Anne. 1999. „Sati Worship
and Marwari Public Identity in India.‟
Asian Studies, 58, 3:723-752.
Harlan, Lindsey. 1994. Religion and
Rajput women: The Ethics of Protection
in Contemporary Narratives. New
Delhi: Mushiram Manohar Publishers.
_______. (n.d). „Headless Heroes:
Pabuji from inside out’. In Multiple
Histories: Culture and Society in the
Study of Rajasthan, edited by Lawrence
A. Babb, Varha Joshi and Michael W.
Meiter, New Delhi: Rawat Publications,
117-140.
Hastrup, Kirsten (1995). A Passage to
Anthropology: Between Experience and
Theory, London: Routledge.
Hiltebeital, Alf. 1999. Draupadi among
Rajputs, Muslims and Dalits: Rethinking
India Oral and Classical Epics. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Joshi, Varsha. (n.d) „Deifying the Dead:
The Satis of Rajasthan’ In: Multiple
Histories: Culture and Society in the
Study of Rajasthan, edited by Lawrence
A. Babb, Varha Joshi and Michael W.
Meiter, New Delhi: Rawat Publications,
198-208.
Knipe, David. 1977. “Sapindikarana:
The Hindu Rite of Entry into Heaven”.
In Religious Encounters with Death:
Insights from the History and
Anthropology of Religions, edited by
Frank E. Reynolds and Earle H. Waugh,
University Park: Pennsylvania State
University Press.
Lecercle, Jen-Jacques. 1990. The
Violence of Language, London:
Routledge.
Maddock, Peter. 1993. Idolatry in
Western Saurasthra: A Case Study of
Social Change and Proto-Modern
Revolution in Art. South Asia, XVI,
special issue, 101-126.
Major, Andrea. 2006. Pious Flames:
European Encounters with Sati. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Noble, William A. and Ram Sankhyan.
1994. “Signs of the Divine: Sati
Memorial and Sati Worship in
Rajasthan”. In The Idea of Rajasthan:
Expolrations in Regional Identity.
Volume I: Constructions, edited by
Karin Schomer, Joan Erdman, Deryck
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
239
Lodrick, and Lloyd Rudolph. New
Delhi: Manohar Publications, 341-89
Romila, Thapar. 1982. “Death and
Hero”. In Mortality and Immortality:
The Anthropology and Archaeology of
Death, edited by S.C Humphreys and
Helen King, London: Academic Press,
293-315.
Schombucher, Elisabeth. 1999. “Death
as the beginning of new life: Hero
Worship among a South Indian Fishing
Caste.” In: Ways of life: Death and its
meaning in South Asia, edited by
Elisabeth Schombucher and Cluas Peter
Zoller, New Delhi: Manohar
Publications, 162-178.
Sontheimer, Günther-Dietz, 2004.
“Some memorial monuments of Western
India” In: Essays on Religion Literature
and Law, edited by Heidrun Bruckner,
Anne Feldhaus and Aditya Malik, New
Delhi: Manohar Publications, 123-155.
Thakur, Upendra. 1963. The History of
Suicide in India, Delhi: Munshi Ram
Manohar Lal.
Walker, George B. 1968. The Hindu
World: An Encyclopaedic Survey of
Hinduism.2 vols. New York: Praeger.
Weinberger-Thomas, Catherine. 2000.
Ashes of Immortality: Widow-Buring in
India, trans. Jeffrey Mehlman and David
Gordon White, New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Indigenous Books
Advani, Bherumal Maharchand. 2003.
Sodhan Ji Sahibi Ya Ranan Jo Raj (A
Short History of Sodhas), Hyderabad:
Gulshan Publications.
Harijan, Raichand. 2005. Tarikh-e-
Registan (History of the Desert),
Jamshoro: Sindhi Adabi Board.
Ojha, Mangaram, 1998. Purano Parkar
(Old Parkar), Jamshoro: Sindhi Adabi
Board.
Solanki, Tejsingh. 2004. Amarkot- Sindh
Jo Ithaas (History of Amarkot-Sindh),
Hyderabad: Gulshan Publications.
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
234
Fig. 1 Memorial stone of Phool Bai Sati at Old Mondaro
Fig. 2 Memorial Stone of Jhoma Sati at Mithario Charan village
Plate 1
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
232
Fig. 3 Memorial Stone of Kasu Ma Mahasati
Fig. 4 The sun with a human face on the top of the memorial stone
Plate 2
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
233
Fig.5 Memorial Stone of Rawoji, husband of Phool Bai
Fig. 6 Hero Stone with depiction of Linga at Hara Sar
Plate 3
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
234
Fig.7 Sati holding water pot in her hand
Fig. 8 Sati holding her husband at Berani village
Plate 4
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
235
Fig.9 Sati Stone depicting raised arm loaded with bangles
Fig.10 Memorial Stone depicting both husband and wife at Khanpur
Plate 5
ZULFIQAR ALI KALHORO
236
Fig.11 Memorial Stones representing horse riders at Berarai
Fig. 12 Hero Stones at Old Sabusan village, Nagarparkar
Plate 6
VANISHING VISUAL HERITAGE: SATI AND HERO-STONES IN
NAGARPARKAR, SINDH- JISOA VOL:XXVII, 2010
237
Fig. 13 Hero Stone depicting camel rider at Sabusan
Fig. 14 Memorial stone depicting two horse riders at Surachand
Plate 7