U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons from the Iberian Pyrite Belt
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons from the Iberian Pyrite Belt
ORIGINAL PAPER
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmaticzircons from the Iberian Pyrite Belt
D. R. N. Rosa & A. A. Finch & T. Andersen &
C. M. C. Inverno
Received: 26 November 2007 /Accepted: 28 August 2008 / Published online: 30 September 2008# Springer-Verlag 2008
Abstract A geochronology and Hf isotope study, usinglaser ablation-ICP-MS analysis of zircon grains, has beenconducted to date felsic volcanic rocks from the Portuguesesector of the Iberian Pyrite Belt and to establish possiblesources for these rocks. The ages obtained range from theFamennian to the Tournaisian, with the oldest ages reportedin the Belt so far being identified in its southwestern part(Cercal area). Results also indicate that within each area,volcanism may have extended for significant periods oftime. This suggests that caution is needed in interpretingpossible migration trends for the volcanism, as the exactstratigraphic position of the sampled rocks is not alwaysclear. Despite of this, the new data, coupled with previously
reported information, suggests that volcanism migratedwithin the basin from the southwest to the northeast (presentday coordinates). Projection from initial zircon ɛHf valuestowards the depleted mantle evolution curve, via anintermediate reservoir, allows the calculation of Hf protolithmodel ages that are predominantly Meso-Proterozoic. This iscompatible with acid magmas resulting from the fusion ofPhyllite–Quartzite (PQ) Formation metasedimentary rocks,which are beneath the volcanic rocks. This is because zircongrains from one PQ Formation sample provided Late Neo-Proterozoic ages and Paleo-Proterozoic to Late Archean U–Pb ages, and the Hf isotope signatures of these zircons canbe expected to mix during fusion and result in protolithmodel ages that would be intermediate between the two U–Pb age populations, as recorded. Further supporting thissource for the magmas, the distribution of U–Pb ages of(pre-Variscan) inherited zircon grains in the volcanic rocksis very similar to that shown by the detrital zircon grainsfrom a PQ sample.
Introduction
The Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) is part of the SouthPortuguese Zone, the southernmost tectonic unit of theIberian Massif and part of the Variscan Orogenic Belt(Julivert et al. 1972). The IPB is interpreted to havedeveloped within a set of pull-apart basins, related to theLate Paleozoic oblique collision of the South Portugueseplate with the Ossa Morena Zone, now located to the north(Silva et al. 1990; Quesada 1991; Tornos et al. 2005;Oliveira et al. 2005). This happened as Pangea amalgam-ated and the Rheic Ocean closed. Syn-volcanic tectonismcaused increased geothermal gradients, and triggered thecirculation and focused discharge of hydrothermal fluids,
Miner Petrol (2009) 95:47–69DOI 10.1007/s00710-008-0022-5
Editorial handling: J. Kosler
D. R. N. Rosa (*) : C. M. C. InvernoINETI-Geological Survey,Estrada da Portela-Zambujal,Alfragide, 2720-866 Amadora, Portugale-mail: [email protected]
D. R. N. RosaGeol. Department, CREMINER-University of Lisbon,Edifício C6, Piso 2, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
A. A. FinchSchool of Geography and Geosciences,University of St. Andrews,St Andrews, Fife, UK
T. AndersenDepartment of Geosciences,University of Oslo,Oslo, Norway
C. M. C. InvernoCREMINER, University of Lisbon,Edifício C6, Piso 2, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
which led to several syngenetic volcanogenic massivesulfide (VMS) deposits. These deposits are of considerableeconomic importance, as they contain significant Cu, Zn,Pb, Sn, Au and Ag. Deposits include Neves-Corvo andAljustrel in Portugal, and Rio Tinto and Aznalcóllar inSpain. The timing, genesis and the evolution of magmasrelated to the formation of these deposits are key inestablishing factors that controlled mineralization and thedevelopment of the IPB basin.
Insights into the timing of the magmatism, its sources andevolution can be obtained through the study of zircon in thevolcanic rocks. This common accessory mineral has a highresistance to high-temperature diffusive re-equilibration andchemical and mechanical weathering. Its low common Pbcontent makes this mineral ideal for U–Pb geochronology,in which the concentrations of U isotopes and daughter Pbisotopes are accurately measured. Additionally, zircon Hfisotope ratios, affected by the decay of 176Lu, provide clueson crustal evolution. Coupled with zircon crystal morphol-ogy, these isotopic systems can therefore be used to provideinsights into magma evolution.
Barrie et al. (2002) reported ID-TIMS U–Pb zircon agesfor felsic rocks from four locations, in both the Portugueseand Spanish sectors of the IPB. Dunning et al. (2002) andNesbitt et al. (1999) reported U–Pb ages for three otherlocations in Spain. While some U–Pb data on volcanicrocks from the IPB are available, they pertain to a limitedset of locations, often with only one sample per location.Additional geochronology constraints are available frompalynomorph and ammonoid studies (Oliveira et al. 2004,2006; Pereira et al. 2007), but these data refer to theinterdigitated metasedimentary rocks and contact relation-ships between these and volcanic rocks are not alwaysclear, either due to tectonic interference or to poor ex-posures. Additional radiometric ages are thus needed inorder to establish migration patterns for the volcanismwithin the IPB basin and to evaluate variations in the age ofthe sources, indicated by inherited grains. Such informationcan aid in the interpretation of the geotectonic evolution ofthe IPB.
In the present article, we report LA-ICPMS U–Pb zircondata for felsic volcanic rocks from several locations withinthe Portuguese sector of the IPB. These results arecompared with published data and palynomorph datingfrom metasedimentary units. Additionally, we report thefirst Hf isotope data from zircons in IPB felsic rocks. TheHf isotope data gathered allow the calculation of protolithmodel ages which are important in the characterization ofpossible sources for the magmas. This is particularlysignificant as these magmas, and associated hydrothermalfluids, are related to the VMS mineralization. To supportthe isotopic evidence, a study of the magmatic zirconmorphologies based on cathodoluminescence imaging has
been also carried out. This study, documenting internalzoning patterns, provides additional insights into the sourceof the magmas and the conditions prevailing during itscrystallization. Finally, reconnaissance U–Pb and Hf iso-tope analyses were made on detrital zircons from a samplefrom the substrate of the IPB, the Phyllite–Quartzite (PQ)Formation, to test this Formation as a possible source forthe felsic magmas. No further data was gathered on the PQformation because a fuller study of this formation will bepublished elsewhere (R. Jorge et al. in prep.).
Geological setting
Three lithostratigraphic groups are recognized in the IPB(Fig. 1), from the oldest to the youngest: (1) the detrital PQFormation, deposited in a shallow marine platform, whosebase is not observed but whose top is Famennian; (2) theVolcanic Siliceous Complex (VSC), hosting the VMSmineralization, of Late Famennian to Middle Visean age;and (3) the turbiditic Flysch Group, marking the filling ofthe basin from the Late Visean to the Serpukhovian(Schermerhorn 1971; Oliveira 1990).
The VSC has normally a thickness of up to 600 m, butcan exceptionally reach thicknesses up to 1300 m (Leistel etal. 1998). Its felsic volcanism was centered in intrabasinalvolcanic edifices that generated voluminous lavas anddomes, and less voluminous but more laterally extensivepyroclastic units. Subsequently, felsic intrusions werelocally emplaced as small cryptodomes and partiallyextrusive cryptodomes (Rosa 2007). Associated with thecoherent felsic facies, there are monomictic breccias.Additionally, resedimented autoclastic facies, coherentmafic facies with uncertain emplacement modes (flowsand/or dykes) and non-volcanic facies, dominated bymudstone, constitute the VSC. Hydrothermal activity takingplace after the volcanism generated the massive sulfidedeposits, as well as abundant manganese-rich and jasperhorizons.
As the result of the Variscan orogeny, the Belt wasaffected by low-grade regional metamorphism, rangingfrom zeolite to greenschist facies (Munhá 1990), and itsstructure is characterized by south- to southwest vergingfolds, corresponding to a thin-skinned foreland fold andthrust belt (Silva et al. 1990).
Geochemistry and petrography of the volcanic rocks
The volcanism of the VSC is bimodal, with a greater volumeof felsic than mafic rocks at current exposure levels (Munhá1983; Mitjavila et al. 1997; Carvalho et al. 1999, Tornos etal. 2005). It is most likely that the majority of intermediate
48 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
compositions reflect silica mobility, with subsequent dispers-al of results on the TAS diagram of Le Maitre et al. (1989),as reported by Rosa et al. (2004). The bimodal nature, withonly minor amounts of intermediate rocks, suggests thatvolcanism was generated in an extensional setting. This iscompatible with the extensional model proposed by Silva etal. (1990), Quesada (1991) and Tornos et al. (2005), amongothers, and is consistent with the geochemistry of the maficrocks (Munhá 1983; Mitjavila et al. 1997; Rosa et al. 2004).The mafic rocks were formed by partial melting of themantle, the degree of which was controlled by the gradualstretching of the lithosphere. This gradual stretchingfavored progressively shallower melting, yielding firstalkaline magmas, with within-plate basalts (WPB) sig-natures, and subsequently tholeiitic magmas, with WPB/mid-oceanic ridge basalts (MORB) signatures. Thesetholeiitic magmas display coupled Th enrichment andNb depletion, which is interpreted as the result of theassimilation of continental crust (Mitjavila et al. 1997;
Rosa et al. 2004). These characteristics are typical ofmagmatism in attenuated continental lithosphere settings,such as the magmatism developed in continental crust bylocal extensional tectonics.
The silicic magmas yielding the felsic rocks were formedby crustal fusion promoted by underplating and theinvasion of the crust by the mafic magmas (Munhá 1983;Mitjavila et al. 1997; Thiéblemont et al. 1998). However,when plotted on the empirically derived tectonic discrim-ination diagrams of Pearce et al. (1984), felsic rocks displayvolcanic arc signatures instead of the extensional settingsuggested by the geochemistry of mafic rocks and by thebimodal distribution of the volcanism. Since the high-fieldstrength elements (HFSE), used in these diagrams, areimmobile, this mismatch has been assigned to anomalouslylow HFSE contents, possibly caused by relatively lowtemperatures of crustal fusion (Rosa et al. 2006). Anoma-lous HFSE concentrations have also been reported in felsicrocks from the Finlayson Lake district, Yukon, Canada and
Lisboa
Madrid
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Á
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Faro
Sines
Huelva
N
Ossa-MorenaZone
4 0 k m
Post-Paleozoic cover
Stitching plutons
Lower Permianoverstepping sequences
Upper Devonian-Lower Carboniferousoverstepping sequences
Syn-orogenic flyschsequencesVolcano-SiliceousComplexPre-orogenicsequences (incl.PQ Fm)
Oceanic sedimentarysequences
Ophiolitic sequences
Ossa-Morena Zone
South Portuguese Terrane:
Iberian Autochthon Terrane:
Pulo do Lobo Terrane:
Atla
ntic
Oce
an
Sevilla
Spa
in
Por
tuga
l
Beja
AB
AL
SB
LS
CE
CA
AJ
CH
Pulo do Lobo
Fig. 1 Simplified geological map of the South Portuguese Zone(modified after Quesada 1991). Location of samples for geochronol-ogy studies: filled diamonds—this study (CE Cercal, CA Caveira, AB
Azinheira de Barros, LS Lousal, AJ Aljustrel, AL Albernoa, SB SerraBranca, CH Chança); open squares—Barrie et al. (2002); opentriangles—Dunning et al. (2002); open circles—Nesbitt et al. (1999)
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 49
Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada, by Piercey et al. (2001)and Lentz (1999), respectively.
For the present study, felsic volcanic rocks from the VSCwere collected at seven locations (Fig. 1, Table 1). AtCercal, Azinheira de Barros, Caveira, Albernoa, SerraBranca and Chança, quartz-feldspar porphyries were sam-pled. Thin section petrography shows that these rock typesare vitrophyric and composed of quartz and plagioclasephenocrysts, the former with frequent embayments. Spo-radically, K-feldspar is also present, as well as biotite, oftenreplaced by chlorite. These phenocrysts are set in a micro-crystalline groundmass, occasionally displaying spheruliticand perlitic textures indicating devitrification from glass.Occasionally, as is the case in one sample from Cercal,flow-banding is apparent. At Serra Branca and Cercal,microporphyries were also sampled. The microporphyrieshave the same mineralogy as the porphyries but thephenocrysts are much smaller and, in Serra Branca, theirgroundmass is altered to hematite. In Aljustrel, threedifferent rock types were sampled; a fine-grained quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry (“Mine Tuff” unit), a coarse-
grained quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry (“Lower volcanics”unit) and the megacryst porphyry (Schermerhorn et al.1987, Leitão 1998), with its characteristic large K-feldsparcrystals, interpreted to have formed through metasomatism(Barriga 1983). Regarding the opaque mineralogy, all rocktypes contain accessory amounts of goethite pseudomorphsafter pyrite. Some samples retain trace amounts of pyriteand/or chalcopyrite.
Cathodoluminescence observations show that the quartzphenocrysts of these rocks display a very weak blueluminescence, occasionally revealing zoning. This suggests acomplex crystallization history during quartz growth, withsudden variations in magma composition and/or temperature.
Accessory amounts of zircon are present in the threerock types, as prismatic crystals, approximately 100 μmlong. These crystals exhibit complex oscillatory zoningpatterns, giving evidence for multistage growth histories.The zoning likely reflects slight compositional variations,with brighter zones corresponding to zones with higher U,Th and REE contents (Corfu et al. 2003), or less radiationdamage (Finch et al. 2004), either through lower concen-
Table 1 Sample locations
Sample ID Rock type Location Coordinates
CE1 Microporphyry 1.5 km SW of Cercal. 37°47′45.30′′ N;8°41′9.00′′ WCE2 Spherulitic, flow-banded
microporphyrySão Luís Quarry(1.5 km NW of São Luís).
37°43′38.70′′ N, 8°40′35.50′′ W
CE3 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry 3.5 km ENE of V.N. Milfontes. 37°44′18.30′′ N, 8°44′24.50′′ WCE4 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry V.N. Milfontes-São Luís road cut,
1.5 km west of São Luís.37°43′1.50′′ N, 8°41′2.10′′ W
CAV2 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry Caveira mine; approx. 300 m SSEof the mine inn.
38°7′7.80′′ N, 8°30′2.25′′ W
AZI4 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry South of Monte da Bela Vista,ENE of the Barros beacon.
38°3′14.20′′ N, 8°25′41.30′′ W
SJ1 Megacryst porphyry São João Quarry, Aljustrel 37°53′3.00′′ N, 8°10′49.00′′ WSJ2 Megacryst porphyry São João Quarry, Aljustrel 37°53′3.00′′ N, 8°10′49.00′′ WFEV1 Coarse-grained quartz-feldspar-phyric
porphyryFeitais mine ramp, +135 m, Level 7,Aljustrel
FEV2 Fine-grained quartz-feldspar-phyricporphyry
Sta. Bárbara adit (Feitais sector),−200 m, Aljustrel
CO5 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry Outcrop on the Cobres creek, 7 kmSSE of the village of Albernoa
37°47′59.45′′ N, 7°55′11.80′′ W
IP4 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry IP2 road cut, 2 km south of thevillage of Albernoa.
37°50′40.50′′ N, 7°57′41.36′′ W
SB54 and SB55 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry EN510 road cut, 3 km SSE of villageof Corte de Gafo de Cima.
37°41′49.70′′ N, 7°41′36.00′′ W
SB8-89,7 Microporphyry Drillcore SB8, 89.7 m downhole.Collar 4 km SE of village of Cortede Gafo de Cima.
37°41′42.20′′ N, 7°41′0.50′′ W
CH601 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry Drillcore CH601, 242 m downhole.Chança prospect.
37°42′27.66′′ N, 7°27′8.00′′ W
CH602 Quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry Drillcore CH602, 175 m downhole.Chança prospect.
34°42′15.12′′ N, 7°26′31.74′′ W
LR23 Phyllite+quartzite Corona creek, near Poço Miguel adit, Lousal. 38°1′48.80′′ N, 8°25′20.20′′ W
50 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
trations of radioactive elements, or indicating youngerovergrowths onto inherited (dark) cores. Occasionally thezircon grains contain dark cores that are consistent witholder inherited zones.
The morphology of the zircon grains, based on therecognition of the crystal forms on cathodoluminescenceimages (Belousova et al. 2006), shows that zircon from theIPB volcanic rocks has two different morphological types(Fig. 2). An earlier zircon generation, which is not alwayspresent, has a well developed {100} prism and approxi-mately balanced amounts of the two pyramids, {101} and{211}. These early zircons correspond to subtypes S22 and/
or S23 described by Pupin (1980). This earlier generation istypically overgrown with the more abundant later genera-tion, which has a more developed {110} prism and {101}as the more developed pyramid, with the {211} pyramidbeing subsidiary. These overgrowth zircons correspond tosubtypes S8 and/or S9 of Pupin’s (1980) typologicalclassification. This last subtype can also frequently occurby itself, and does not necessarily constitute overgrowths.These morphological features can be related to changingtemperature and magma composition, on the Pupin (1980)typological classification scheme (Fig. 2c). According toPupin (1980), the relative growth of each prism form
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
INDEX A
(301)(101)(101)>>(211)(101)>(211)(101)=(211)(101)<(211)(101)<<(211)(211)
NO PRISM
(110)
(100)<(110)
(100)=(110)
(100)>(110)
(100)
(100)>>(110)
900oC
850oC
800oC
700oC
650oC
600oC
550oC
(100)<<(110)
750oC
PR
ISM
S
PYRAMIDS
B AB1 AB2 AB3 AB4 AB5 A C
IG1
G2
G3L5
R1P1S5S4S3
L4L3L2L1
S2S1
H
Q1
Q2 S6
Q3 S11
S7 S8
S12 S13
S16Q4 S17 S18 S19 S20
S9 S10
S14 S15 P3
P2 R2
R3
P4 R4
R5
FD
P5S25
J5
S24S23S22
J2 J4J3
Q5 S21
E J1
a) b)
c)
50 µm 50 µm
{100}
{110
}
{101}
{211}
Fig. 2 Morphological types ofzircon from a rhyodacite por-phyry from Serra Branca. Cath-odoluminescence imaging andestablished trend on the typo-logical classification scheme ofPupin (1980): (a) illustration ofthe progression of pyramids(sample SB50); (b) illustrationof the change of prisms (sampleSB18); (c) trend on the typo-logical scheme. The imageswere acquired under the follow-ing instrumental settings: accel-erating potential 14 kV, probecurrent 600 μA
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 51
encodes the temperature, while the pyramid forms reflectthe alkalinity of the magma. The established trendcorresponds to the cooling of a calc-alkaline to aluminousmagma, of mainly crustal origin. This origin is compatiblewith the model proposed by Munhá (1983), Mitjavila et al.(1997) and Thiéblemont et al. (1998).
Analytical techniques
Sample preparation
Samples for this study were collected at the locationsindicated in Fig. 1, with additional information in Table 1.In addition to the felsic rocks, a sample of the PQFormation was collected, to test if this could be a crediblesource for the acid magmas. Zircon grains were separatedfrom samples using standard density and magnetic proce-dures, at the Department of Geography and Geosciences ofthe University of St Andrews and at the Department ofGeosciences of the University of Oslo. These proceduresincluded the crushing of samples in a jaw crusher, followedby sieving of the <425 μm fractions. The heavy mineralsfrom these fine fractions were then separated usingtetrabromoethane or hetero-polytungstate solution. Subse-quently, the heavy mineral fraction was separated intofractions with different magnetic susceptibilities using aFrantz isodynamic separator. Finally, zircons were hand-picked, under a binocular microscope, from the non-magnetic fraction, mounted in epoxy and polished. Detailedimaging of each grain was carried out using cathodolumi-nescence and backscattered electron imaging. Particularcare was put into identifying inherited cores and limitsbetween different generations of magmatic zircons, toensure that analysis did not straddle different domains.Cathodoluminescence observations and imaging were doneat the University of St Andrews, UK, using a TechnocynMark 4 CL cold cathode equipment attached to an opticalmicroscope. The instrument was set with an acceleratingpotential of 14 kV and probe current of 600 μA.
LA-ICP-MS
Based on the morphological study of magmatic zircons,selected spots were analyzed by LA-ICP-MS. Some zirconsextracted from a PQ Formation sample were also analyzed,for comparison.
U–Pb dating and Lu-Hf isotope analysis were per-formed using a Nu Plasma HR multicollector ICPMS atthe Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo,which is equipped with a U–Pb collector block (fordesign details of the Nu Plasma U–Pb collector block,see Simonetti et al. 2005). A New Wave LUV213 Nd:
YAG laser microprobe was used. Samples were ablated inHe gas (gas flow=1.0 l/min) in an ablation cell similar tothat of Jackson et al. (2004). The He aerosol was mixedwith Ar (gas flow=0.7 l/min) in a teflon mixing cell priorto entry into the plasma. The gas mixture was optimizeddaily for maximum sensitivity. All analyses were made instatic ablation mode, with the laser beam focused inaperture imaging mode with a circular spot geometry. Thisproduced circular, flat-bottomed ablation pits. U–Pb agesand Hf isotope data were determined individually onadjacent spots, using laser operating conditions (seebelow) which secured maximum preservation of theunablated part of the zircon.
U–Pb
U–Pb analyses were made according to analytical protocolsdescribed by Andersen et al. (2007) and Røhr et al. (2008).A single U–Pb measurement included 30 s of on-massbackground measurement, followed by 60 s of ablationwith a stationary beam. Laser conditions for U–Pb analysiswere: beam diameter: 40 μm; pulse frequency: 10 Hz; beamenergy density: ca. 0.06 J/cm2. At these conditions, thedepth-to-diameter ratio of the ablation pit produced duringa 60 s ablation was significantly less than one. Masses 204,206 and 207 were measured in secondary electron multi-pliers, and 238 in the extra high mass Faraday collector ofthe Nu Plasma U–Pb collector block. The geometry of thecollector block does not allow simultaneous measurementof 208Pb and 232Th.
Ion counter counts were converted and reported as voltsby the Nu Plasma time-resolved analysis software. 235Uwas calculated from the signal at mass 238 using a natural238U/235U=137.88.
Mass number 204 was used as a monitor for common204Pb. In an ICPMS analysis, 204Hg originating from theargon supply contaminates mass 204, the observed back-ground counting-rate was ca. 1000 cps (ca. 1.6×10−5 V),and has been stable at that level over a 3-year period. Thecontribution of 204Hg from the plasma was eliminated byon-mass background measurement prior to each analysis.At the low laser energy used, there was no excess ionizationof 204Hg from the gas supply during ablation, so that theon-mass background measurement is representative for theconditions during analysis. Analyses which yielded peak/background ratios at mass 204 of less than 1 + 3RSDB
(where RSDB is the observed relative standard deviation ofthe on-peak background measurement), were considered tohave common lead below the detection limit. Typically, thiswould amount to a background-corrected signal strength onmass 204 of ca. 1.5×10−6 V. For comparison, standards91500 and GJ-1, which are known to contain negligibleamounts of common lead (Wiedenbeck et al. 1995; Jackson
52 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
et al. 2004) gave back-ground corrected signal strengths<1.0×10−6 V, i.e. well below the detection limit. In thepresent study, grains showing common lead contents abovethe detection limit were discarded, unless there were nosuitable grains in the whole sample. In contrast, backgroundlevels at masses 206 and 207, which are not influenced byisobaric overlap from contaminating nuclides are ≤300 cps(≤5×10−6 V). Signal strengths on mass 206 for Phanerozoiczircons were typically >(>) 10−4 V, depending on theuranium content of the zircons.
One or two calibration standards were run in duplicate atthe beginning and end of each analytical session, and atregular intervals during sessions. Raw data from the massspectrometer (converted to volts) were corrected forbackground, laser induced elemental fractionation, massdiscrimination and drift in ion counter gains and reduced toU and 206Pb concentrations and U–Pb isotope ratios bycalibration to concordant reference zircons of known age,using protocols adapted from Andersen et al. (2004) andJackson et al. (2004). Standard zircons GJ-01 (609±1Ma; Belousova et al. 2006) and 91500 (1065±1 Ma;Wiedenbeck et al. 1995) were used for calibration. Thecalculations were done off-line, using an in-house inter-active spreadsheet program written in Microsoft Excel/VBA, but with the most computation-heavy routineswritten in C for greater speed of calculation.
Background-corrected signals for mass numbers 204,206, 207 and 238 and the 207Pb/206Pb, 206Pb/238U and207Pb/235U isotope ratios were plotted as traces of observedvoltage and voltage ratios against ablation time, and time-intervals which were homogeneous in isotopic compositionwere interactively selected for integration. To minimize theeffects of laser-induced elemental fractionation, the depth-to-diameter ratio of the ablation pit was kept low, andisotopically homogeneous segments of the time-resolvedtraces were calibrated against the corresponding time-interval for each mass in the reference zircon. Tocompensate for drift in instrument sensitivity and Faradayvs. electron multiplier gain during an analytical session, alinear correlation of signal vs. time was assumed for thereference zircons.
The calibration software incorporates two differentalgorithms for the conversion of background- and drift-corrected signal ratios to isotope and element ratios. Thesimplest approach assumes that the isotopic ratio is a linearfunction of signal ratio and time, i.e.
y ¼ x aþ ctð Þ ð1Þwhere y is the isotopic ratio to be determined, x is theobserved voltage ratio and t the time since the start of theanalytical session. The coefficients a and c are determinedby linear regression of the calibration standards. Thisapproach is equivalent to that incorporated in the commer-
cial software package GLITTER (Van Achterbergh et al.2000). One or more standards can be used to determine aand c by linear regression. At high counting rates on the ioncounters (typically>100,000 cps), effects of dead-time anddeviations from detector linearity affect the results. This canbe compensated by introducing a second-order term in thecalibration equation:
y ¼ x aþ bxþ ctð Þ ð2ÞThe coefficients a, b and c are determined by regression of
data from two or more reference samples. The non-linearcalibration is mainly relevant for zircons with elevated206Pb/238U ratio, i.e. mid-Proterozoic or older zircons. Forthe Phanerozoic zircons analysed in the present study, countingrates are much lower, and Eq. 1 and 2 give indistinguishableresults (Appendix, Table 4). U and 206Pb concentrations werecalculated from observed signals at masses 238 and 206,calibrated to standards according to Eq. 1.
The estimated uncertainties in isotope ratios incorpo-rate error terms from counting statistics on signals andbackgrounds for the relevant masses measured on stan-dards and unknowns, the standard error of the regressionline determined from standards, and the publisheduncertainty of the calibration standards. The terms havebeen propagated through, using standard error propaga-tion algorithms (e.g. Taylor 1997). The correlationcoefficient of errors in the 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U(=137.88·207Pb/238U) ratios has been determined from theraw data for each analysis.
The Phanerozoic Temora-2 (TIMS-ID U–Pb age: 416.8±1.3 Ma; Black et al. 2004) and Plešovice (TIMS-ID U–Pbage: 337.1±0.4 Ma; Sláma et al. 2008) reference zirconswere run as unknowns; data obtained during this study aregiven in Appendix (Table 4 and Fig. 9).
Hafnium isotope analysis
For Hf isotope analysis of zircons, masses 172 to 179 weremeasured in Faraday collectors. Ablation conditions were:beam diameter: 55 μm (aperture imaging mode), pulsefrequency: 5 Hz, beam energy density: 1 J/cm2. Eachablation was preceded by a 30 s on-mass backgroundmeasurement. The total Hf signal obtained for zircons withnormal Hf concentration was 1.5–3.0 V. Under theseconditions, 120-150 s of ablation are needed to obtain aninternal precision of ≤±0.000020 (1 SE).
Isotopic ratios were calculated on-line from raw datausing the Nu Plasma time-resolved analysis software.The raw data were corrected for mass discriminationusing an exponential law, the mass discrimination factorfor Hf was determined assuming 179Hf/177Hf=0.7325.The mass discrimination factor for Yb was monitoredfrom the 173Yb/172Yb ratio, but could not be determined
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 53
Tab
le2
U–P
bzircon
data
Area
Uppm
206/204
207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/238U*
1SE
Rho
Discordance
207Pb/206Pb
2σ207Pb/235U
2σ206Pb/238U
2σVoltsignal
(backgroundcorrected)
Sam
ple/grain
%Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
206
207
238
Cercal
CE1-zr1
310
2795
0.05484
0.0012
0.44005
0.0040
0.0584
0.0007
0.52
−10.4
406
90370
6366
100.000986
0.000057
0.022475
CE1-zr5
905
5273
0.05447
0.0012
0.44582
0.0052
0.0596
0.0009
0.94
−5391
94374
8373
120.002887
0.000164
0.064541
CE1-zr7
246
3437
0.05407
0.0012
0.43485
0.0048
0.0586
0.0008
0.66
−2.4
374
94367
6367
100.000774
0.000044
0.017553
CE1-zr8
437
3734
0.05403
0.0012
0.44685
0.0046
0.0603
0.0009
0.57
0.9
372
96375
6377
100.001418
0.000080
0.031201
CE1-zr9
200
1631
0.05422
0.0012
0.44510
0.0054
0.0598
0.0009
0.67
−2380
96374
8374
100.000644
0.000036
0.014246
CE1-zr12
666
9664
0.05483
0.0012
0.45319
0.0048
0.0602
0.0009
0.73
−7.6
405
100
380
6377
100.002164
0.000123
0.047519
CE1-zr13
668
7600
0.05493
0.0012
0.44191
0.0047
0.0586
0.0009
0.78
−11
410
94372
6367
100.002112
0.000120
0.047639
CE1-zr14
1372
4854
0.05473
0.0012
0.45338
0.0047
0.0604
0.0009
0.74
−6.4
401
96380
6378
100.004469
0.000253
0.097901
CE1-zr15
773
19553
0.05395
0.0012
0.44226
0.0050
0.0597
0.0009
0.87
1369
98372
6374
120.002495
0.000139
0.055178
CE1-zr16
451
8647
0.05408
0.0012
0.44413
0.0060
0.0598
0.0010
0.95
−0.3
374
94373
8375
120.001454
0.000081
0.032144
CE1-zr17
399
2842
0.05487
0.0013
0.44249
0.0046
0.0588
0.0009
0.71
−10.2
407
104
372
6368
100.001291
0.000073
0.029046
CE1-zr19
371
4909
0.05396
0.0012
0.44646
0.0049
0.0603
0.0009
0.81
1.7
369
96375
6377
100.001210
0.000067
0.026489
CE1-zr20
784
5971
0.05410
0.0012
0.45185
0.0049
0.0609
0.0009
0.81
1.1
375
96379
6381
120.002583
0.000144
0.055964
CE1-zr21
654
5996
0.05500
0.0012
0.45104
0.0048
0.0598
0.0009
0.71
−9.9
412
94378
6374
100.002117
0.000119
0.046643
CE1-zr24
522
6318
0.05494
0.0012
0.45582
0.0050
0.0604
0.0009
0.51
−8.3
410
94381
6378
120.001710
0.000096
0.037214
CE1-zr10
121
8458
0.12612
0.0045
5.72535
0.2329
0.3508
0.0118
0.83
−11.8
2045
120
1935
701938
112
0.002524
0.000341
0.008609
CE1-zr11
470
3738
0.05393
0.0012
0.44136
0.0046
0.0596
0.0009
0.58
1368
96371
6373
100.001511
0.000084
0.033512
CE2-zr11
410
2799
0.05424
0.0002
0.43348
0.0051
0.0580
0.0007
0.46
−4.8
381
14366
8363
80.001469
0.000085
0.031219
CE2-zr12
442
5023
0.05430
0.0002
0.44238
0.0052
0.0591
0.0007
0.48
−3.6
383
14372
8370
80.001605
0.000093
0.033534
CE2-zr13
548
6351
0.05396
0.0002
0.43322
0.0052
0.0582
0.0007
0.55
−1.2
369
14365
8365
80.001965
0.000113
0.041657
CE2-zr14
402
4203
0.05351
0.0002
0.43138
0.0053
0.0585
0.0007
0.64
4.6
351
14364
8366
80.001441
0.000082
0.030458
CE2-zr15
415
4406
0.05386
0.0002
0.43233
0.0053
0.0582
0.0007
0.50
−0.1
365
16365
8365
80.001483
0.000085
0.031470
CE2-zr16
386
77084
0.05388
0.0002
0.43787
0.0051
0.0590
0.0007
0.40
0.8
366
14369
8369
80.001378
0.000079
0.029007
CE2-zr17
506
4858
0.05436
0.0002
0.44220
0.0055
0.0590
0.0007
0.58
−4.3
386
14372
8370
80.001779
0.000103
0.037659
CE2-zr2
384
2986
0.05450
0.0002
0.43564
0.0050
0.0580
0.0007
.−7
.5392
14367
8363
80.001436
0.000083
0.030010
CE2-zr20
752
7648
0.05432
0.0002
0.44940
0.0055
0.0600
0.0007
0.58
−2.4
384
12377
8376
80.002665
0.000154
0.055750
CE2-zr21
262
2316
0.05480
0.0003
0.43956
0.0057
0.0582
0.0007
0.23
−10.1
404
20370
8365
80.000897
0.000052
0.019365
CE2-zr22
541
3441
0.05428
0.0002
0.44533
0.0053
0.0595
0.0007
0.49
−2.7
383
14374
8373
80.001879
0.000108
0.039793
CE2-zr24
419
3797
0.05470
0.0002
0.44715
0.0057
0.0593
0.0007
0.55
−7.4
400
16375
8371
80.001430
0.000083
0.030561
CE2-zr25
456
7878
0.05413
0.0002
0.44395
0.0052
0.0595
0.0007
0.48
−1.1
377
14373
8373
80.001537
0.000088
0.032864
CE2-zr27
497
3185
0.05414
0.0002
0.43491
0.0053
0.0583
0.0007
0.59
−3.2
377
12367
8365
80.001645
0.000094
0.035892
CE2-zr28
542
411150
0.05415
0.0003
0.44505
0.0048
0.0596
0.0006
0.70
−1.2
377
20374
6373
80.001741
0.000100
0.037490
CE2-zr29
496
5280
0.05393
0.0002
0.43612
0.0056
0.0587
0.0007
0.58
−0.2
368
14368
8367
80.001655
0.000095
0.035884
CE2-zr30
422
4009
0.05398
0.0002
0.43776
0.0058
0.0588
0.0007
0.66
−0.5
370
20369
8368
80.001412
0.000081
0.030577
CE2-zr31
361
1484
0.05385
0.0002
0.43230
0.0055
0.0582
0.0007
0.46
.365
16365
8365
80.001191
0.000068
0.026085
CE2-zr34
295
2791
0.05460
0.0002
0.44613
0.0057
0.0593
0.0007
0.28
−6.4
396
16375
8371
80.000981
0.000057
0.021164
CE2-zr35
376
3255
0.05356
0.0002
0.43528
0.0056
0.0590
0.0007
0.67
4.8
353
14367
8369
80.001233
0.000070
0.026849
CE2-zr37
642
3039
0.05405
0.0002
0.44752
0.0055
0.0601
0.0007
0.53
0.7
373
12376
8376
80.002124
0.000122
0.045521
CE2-zr39
728
7700
0.05390
0.0002
0.44983
0.0054
0.0605
0.0007
0.66
3.4
367
12377
8379
80.002355
0.000134
0.050521
CE2-zr40
482
22505
0.05416
0.0002
0.44101
0.0052
0.0591
0.0007
0.65
−2.1
378
14371
8370
80.001496
0.000086
0.032991
CE2-zr43
435
3297
0.05416
0.0002
0.43795
0.0057
0.0587
0.0007
0.31
−2.8
378
14369
8367
80.001372
0.000079
0.030431
CE2-zr44
496
6278
0.05413
0.0002
0.44766
0.0056
0.0600
0.0007
0.62
−0.2
376
16376
8376
80.001587
0.000091
0.034485
CE2-zr46
465
3509
0.05383
0.0002
0.44377
0.0058
0.0598
0.0007
0.39
3364
16373
8374
80.001486
0.000085
0.032378
CE2-zr49
365
2892
0.05494
0.0003
0.44536
0.0061
0.0588
0.0008
0.31
−10.5
410
22374
8368
100.001143
0.000066
0.025383
CE2-zr5
1842
13851
0.05387
0.0002
0.45148
0.0054
0.0608
0.0007
0.59
4.2
366
12378
8380
80.007158
0.000410
0.142732
CE2-zr51
507
6998
0.05452
0.0002
0.45174
0.0059
0.0601
0.0007
0.50
−4.3
392
14378
8376
100.001607
0.000093
0.035024
CE2-zr52
351
1680
0.05462
0.0002
0.45181
0.0057
0.0600
0.0007
0.32
−5.4
397
16379
8376
80.001098
0.000064
0.024036
CE2-zr56
548
8275
0.05394
0.0002
0.44848
0.0054
0.0603
0.0007
0.55
2.5
368
12376
8377
80.001679
0.000096
0.036754
54 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
Tab
le2
(contin
ued)
Area
Uppm
206/204
207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/238U*
1SE
Rho
Discordance
207Pb/206Pb
2σ207Pb/235U
2σ206Pb/238U
2σVoltsignal
(backgroundcorrected)
Sam
ple/grain
%Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
206
207
238
CE2-zr57
711
8682
0.05419
0.0002
0.45233
0.0059
0.0605
0.0008
0.35
.379
14379
8379
100.002225
0.000128
0.048550
CE2-zr7
515
3381
0.05387
0.0002
0.43722
0.0053
0.0589
0.0007
0.38
0.8
366
14368
8369
80.001900
0.000109
0.039475
CE2-zr8
400
3113
0.05432
0.0002
0.44038
0.0051
0.0588
0.0007
0.64
−4.3
384
16371
8368
80.001452
0.000084
0.030414
CE2-zr9
268
2752
0.05381
0.0002
0.43395
0.0054
0.0585
0.0007
0.50
0.9
363
16366
8366
80.000977
0.000056
0.020522
CE3-zr107
638
5136
0.05377
0.0003
0.43932
0.0054
0.0593
0.0006
0.35
2.7
361
22370
8371
60.001926
0.000110
0.044705
CE3-zr12
222
1760
0.05504
0.0004
0.44194
0.0061
0.0583
0.0006
0.04
−12.1
414
34372
8365
60.000697
0.000041
0.016033
CE3-zr123
1199
10727
0.05368
0.0002
0.44298
0.0050
0.0599
0.0006
0.71
4.9
358
16372
6375
60.003635
0.000207
0.083772
CE3-zr129
1780
6848
0.05453
0.0002
0.45091
0.0049
0.0600
0.0006
0.77
−4.6
393
14378
6375
60.005372
0.000311
0.123768
CE3-zr135
1477
9620
0.05391
0.0003
0.44275
0.0054
0.0596
0.0006
0.53
1.5
367
20372
8373
60.004457
0.000255
0.103111
CE3-zr20
1427
7933
0.05414
0.0002
0.44685
0.0046
0.0599
0.0006
0.56
−0.6
377
12375
6375
60.004486
0.000259
0.100578
CE3-zr22
1468
9456
0.05401
0.0002
0.44167
0.0049
0.0593
0.0005
0.42
.372
18371
6371
60.004674
0.000269
0.105769
CE3-zr23
849
6361
0.05488
0.0002
0.44509
0.0045
0.0588
0.0005
0.58
−9.8
407
18374
6369
60.002646
0.000155
0.060505
CE3-zr26
1050
14090
0.05385
0.0003
0.43586
0.0054
0.0587
0.0006
0.49
0.8
365
22367
8368
60.003283
0.000188
0.075179
CE3-zr29
1212
5549
0.05482
0.0002
0.44975
0.0051
0.0595
0.0005
0.55
−8.2
405
18377
8373
60.003855
0.000225
0.087171
CE3-zr31
928
11616
0.05424
0.0002
0.44573
0.0049
0.0596
0.0005
0.48
−2.1
381
16374
6373
60.002941
0.000170
0.066480
CE3-zr33
1008
9168
0.05386
0.0002
0.43466
0.0049
0.0585
0.0005
0.57
0.4
365
18366
6367
60.003146
0.000180
0.072405
CE3-zr34
1602
10294
0.05390
0.0002
0.44589
0.0048
0.0600
0.0006
0.80
2.5
367
14374
6376
60.004995
0.000287
0.112398
CE3-zr4
1136
3973
0.05472
0.0003
0.44268
0.0055
0.0587
0.0006
0.66
−8.5
401
20372
8368
80.003595
0.000210
0.081835
CE3-zr41
898
6630
0.05362
0.0002
0.44093
0.0050
0.0596
0.0006
0.41
5.2
355
18371
6373
60.002794
0.000159
0.063300
CE3-zr42
718
18023
0.05377
0.0002
0.43879
0.0052
0.0592
0.0006
0.70
2.6
362
20369
8371
60.002230
0.000128
0.050907
CE3-zr43
1052
5418
0.05388
0.0002
0.43986
0.0049
0.0592
0.0005
0.53
1.4
366
18370
6371
60.003274
0.000188
0.074782
CE3-zr44
235
2185
0.05385
0.0003
0.43341
0.0051
0.0584
0.0006
0.51
0.3
365
22366
8366
60.000730
0.000042
0.016890
CE3-zr47
1347
14476
0.05372
0.0002
0.43971
0.0049
0.0594
0.0006
0.68
3.5
359
16370
6372
60.004157
0.000238
0.094827
CE3-zr50
980
10379
0.05385
0.0003
0.44344
0.0055
0.0597
0.0006
0.54
2.5
365
22373
8374
60.003080
0.000176
0.069774
CE3-zr51
1071
8840
0.05415
0.0002
0.44479
0.0048
0.0596
0.0005
0.65
−1.1
377
16374
6373
60.003342
0.000193
0.076055
CE3-zr53
905
91273
0.05396
0.0002
0.43870
0.0048
0.0590
0.0005
0.61
.369
16369
6369
60.002796
0.000161
0.064311
CE3-zr54
913
24959
0.05359
0.0003
0.43955
0.0052
0.0595
0.0006
0.69
5.4
354
22370
8373
60.002823
0.000161
0.064528
CE3-zr55
603
7642
0.05421
0.0002
0.43706
0.0048
0.0585
0.0005
0.72
−3.6
380
16368
6366
60.001835
0.000106
0.042752
CE3-zr56
1034
11430
0.05398
0.0003
0.44298
0.0055
0.0595
0.0006
0.82
0.7
370
22372
8373
60.003199
0.000183
0.073157
CE3-zr6
1552
4441
0.05495
0.0002
0.44801
0.0049
0.0591
0.0006
0.69
−10
410
16376
6370
60.004745
0.000278
0.107550
CE3-zr60
1251
23340
0.05399
0.0002
0.44597
0.0049
0.0599
0.0006
0.41
1.2
371
14374
6375
60.003805
0.000218
0.086720
CE3-zr63
700
6957
0.05459
0.0002
0.43934
0.0049
0.0584
0.0005
0.57
−7.7
395
18370
6366
60.002100
0.000122
0.049133
CE3-zr70
1340
6321
0.05507
0.0003
0.44911
0.0056
0.0592
0.0006
0.66
−11
415
22377
8371
60.004106
0.000240
0.094659
CE3-zr71
1409
11143
0.05399
0.0003
0.44726
0.0055
0.0601
0.0006
0.87
1.6
371
22375
8376
80.004365
0.000250
0.099220
CE3-zr72
1146
9603
0.05363
0.0002
0.43977
0.0051
0.0595
0.0006
0.80
4.9
355
18370
8372
60.003519
0.000200
0.080898
CE3-zr73
1201
9544
0.05423
0.0002
0.45340
0.0050
0.0607
0.0006
0.64
−0.3
380
16380
6380
60.003697
0.000213
0.083686
CE3-zr8
1102
8336
0.05396
0.0002
0.43790
0.0049
0.0589
0.0006
0.52
−0.2
369
18369
6369
60.003505
0.000202
0.079669
CE3-zr80
1144
12383
0.05390
0.0003
0.43535
0.0052
0.0586
0.0006
0.53
.367
20367
8367
60.003426
0.000196
0.080146
CE3-zr86
1164
6471
0.05407
0.0002
0.44420
0.0051
0.0596
0.0006
0.56
−0.2
374
16373
8373
60.003506
0.000201
0.080959
CE3-zr97
1004
4616
0.05375
0.0002
0.44395
0.0048
0.0599
0.0006
0.50
4.1
361
14373
6375
60.003041
0.000173
0.070017
CE4-zr100
1328
8040
0.05394
0.0002
0.43729
0.0038
0.0588
0.0004
0.48
−0.1
369
18368
6368
40.004238
0.000242
0.100436
CE4-zr102
1092
43019
0.05343
0.0002
0.43552
0.0035
0.0591
0.0004
0.65
6.9
347
16367
4370
40.003538
0.000200
0.083268
CE4-zr106
674
9258
0.05360
0.0002
0.43215
0.0035
0.0585
0.0004
0.21
3.4
354
20365
4366
40.002166
0.000123
0.051472
CE4-zr109
346
72349
0.05386
0.0003
0.43259
0.0037
0.0583
0.0004
0.53
.365
22365
6365
40.001108
0.000063
0.026446
CE4-zr112
1159
11089
0.05374
0.0002
0.43607
0.0037
0.0589
0.0004
0.53
2.3
360
18367
6369
40.003713
0.000212
0.088006
CE4-zr113
1402
14068
0.05346
0.0002
0.43554
0.0037
0.0591
0.0004
0.72
6.4
348
16367
6370
40.004499
0.000255
0.106239
CE4-zr117
1045
6959
0.05387
0.0002
0.43614
0.0039
0.0587
0.0004
0.61
0.6
366
18368
6368
40.003351
0.000191
0.079650
CE4-zr13
1448
3525
0.05456
0.0002
0.44962
0.0049
0.0598
0.0006
0.76
−5.2
394
16377
6374
60.004353
0.000252
0.101036
CE4-zr16
917
3653
0.05415
0.0003
0.44280
0.0055
0.0593
0.0006
0.57
−1.7
377
22372
8371
60.002728
0.000157
0.063689
CE4-zr20
944
4343
0.05398
0.0002
0.44230
0.0035
0.0594
0.0004
0.65
0.5
370
16372
4372
40.003057
0.000175
0.070925
CE4-zr27
1130
4395
0.05444
0.0002
0.44302
0.0040
0.0590
0.0004
0.77
−5.2
389
20372
6370
40.003610
0.000208
0.084448
CE4-zr31
1302
3852
0.05452
0.0002
0.44641
0.0041
0.0594
0.0004
0.87
−5.5
393
16375
6372
60.004189
0.000242
0.097140
CE4-zr39
1388
4494
0.05402
0.0002
0.43896
0.0039
0.0589
0.0004
0.87
−0.8
372
16370
6369
40.004446
0.000255
0.104082
CE4-zr43
977
11601
0.05374
0.0003
0.43578
0.0039
0.0588
0.0004
0.60
2.4
360
20367
6368
40.003135
0.000178
0.073474
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 55
Tab
le2
(contin
ued)
Area
Uppm
206/204
207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/238U*
1SE
Rho
Discordance
207Pb/206Pb
2σ207Pb/235U
2σ206Pb/238U
2σVoltsignal
(backgroundcorrected)
Sam
ple/grain
%Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
206
207
238
CE4-zr44
993
6768
0.05370
0.0002
0.43693
0.0035
0.0590
0.0004
0.71
3.3
358
16368
4370
40.003198
0.000182
0.074832
CE4-zr49
1145
5324
0.05425
0.0002
0.44124
0.0036
0.0590
0.0004
0.53
−3.3
382
16371
6369
40.003678
0.000211
0.086230
CE4-zr56
1017
4387
0.05395
0.0002
0.43709
0.0035
0.0588
0.0004
0.53
−0.2
369
16368
4368
40.003259
0.000186
0.076663
CE4-zr59
885
5451
0.05385
0.0002
0.44393
0.0039
0.0598
0.0004
0.67
2.6
365
18373
6374
60.002858
0.000163
0.066285
CE4-zr6
1095
2641
0.05454
0.0002
0.44793
0.0050
0.0596
0.0006
0.67
−5.4
394
16376
6373
60.003273
0.000189
0.076176
CE4-zr61
1122
7099
0.05372
0.0002
0.43672
0.0038
0.0590
0.0004
0.86
2.9
359
16368
6369
40.003599
0.000205
0.084532
CE4-zr62
1051
4909
0.05410
0.0002
0.43662
0.0038
0.0585
0.0004
0.53
−2.4
375
18368
6367
40.003344
0.000192
0.079188
CE4-zr63
985
9128
0.05355
0.0002
0.43331
0.0036
0.0587
0.0004
0.64
4.5
352
16366
6368
40.003148
0.000179
0.074162
CE4-zr64
1231
10678
0.05434
0.0003
0.44024
0.0041
0.0588
0.0004
0.59
−4.5
385
22370
6368
40.003945
0.000227
0.092727
CE4-zr67
826
3948
0.05464
0.0003
0.44846
0.0041
0.0595
0.0004
0.20
−6.4
397
22376
6373
60.002678
0.000155
0.062156
CE4-zr68
956
10137
0.05362
0.0002
0.43885
0.0038
0.0594
0.0004
0.69
4.7
355
18369
6372
40.003100
0.000176
0.072312
CE4-zr8
1313
7388
0.05394
0.0003
0.44035
0.0056
0.0592
0.0006
0.83
0.6
369
22370
8371
80.003923
0.000224
0.091471
CE4-zr80
1299
5986
0.05443
0.0002
0.44462
0.0038
0.0593
0.0004
0.84
−4.7
389
18374
6371
40.004210
0.000243
0.098566
CE4-zr84
1183
11119
0.05375
0.0002
0.43719
0.0037
0.0590
0.0004
0.50
2.6
361
16368
6370
40.003797
0.000216
0.089365
CE4-zr96
260
2177
0.05467
0.0003
0.43934
0.0040
0.0583
0.0004
0.29
−8.7
399
22370
6365
40.000829
0.000048
0.019730
CE4-zr99
1464
8304
0.05430
0.0003
0.44913
0.0048
0.0600
0.0005
0.67
−2.1
383
22377
6376
60.004568
0.000263
0.106990
Caveira
CAV2-zr63
991034
0.05680
0.0009
0.45048
0.0080
0.0577
0.0007
0.66
−26.2
484
62378
12362
80.000299
0.000019
0.006776
CAV2-zr57
128
1203
0.05695
0.0007
0.45345
0.0063
0.05792
0.0007
0.43
−26.8
490
52380
8363
80.000390
0.000024
0.008789
CAV2-zr45
103
1243
0.05838
0.0008
0.46818
0.0079
0.05833
0.0007
0.66
−34
544
60390
10365
80.000318
0.000020
0.007077
CAV2-zr25
145
1246
0.06356
0.0012
0.51119
0.0104
0.05848
0.0007
0.41
−51.1
727
78419
14366
80.000456
0.000032
0.009984
CAV2-zr37
651254
0.05864
0.001
0.47111
0.0085
0.05843
0.0007
0.18
−35
554
70392
12366
80.000201
0.000013
0.004446
CAV2-zr5
167
1334
0.05577
0.0006
0.44116
0.0056
0.05748
0.0007
0.45
−19.4
443
46371
8360
80.000525
0.000032
0.011484
CAV2-zr11
528
1434
0.05881
0.0006
0.47282
0.0054
0.05843
0.0007
0.67
−35.8
560
40393
8366
80.001677
0.000107
0.036316
CAV2-zr29
152
1569
0.05619
0.0007
0.45127
0.0067
0.05838
0.0007
0.35
−21.3
460
56378
10366
80.000476
0.000029
0.010465
CAV2-zr9
116
1664
0.05649
0.0008
0.45190
0.0081
0.05814
0.0007
0.65
−23.5
472
64379
12364
80.000366
0.000022
0.007974
CAV2-zr32
285
1770
0.05587
0.0005
0.44603
0.0052
0.05804
0.0007
0.66
−19.4
447
42374
8364
80.000886
0.000054
0.019621
CAV2-zr20
221
2129
0.06018
0.0009
0.48862
0.0089
0.05902
0.0007
0.80
−40.7
610
68404
12370
80.000704
0.000046
0.015225
CAV2-zr43
732190
0.05864
0.001
0.47123
0.0092
0.05845
0.0007
0.52
−35
554
70392
12366
80.000226
0.000014
0.005012
CAV2-zr16
194
2240
0.05484
0.0006
0.43365
0.0060
0.05748
0.0007
0.71
−11.7
406
48366
8360
80.000601
0.000036
0.013309
CAV2-zr26
191
2247
0.05537
0.0006
0.44057
0.0057
0.05785
0.0007
0.36
−15.8
427
48371
8363
80.000593
0.000036
0.013138
CAV2-zr17
180
2752
0.06098
0.0009
0.48704
0.0078
0.05806
0.0007
0.27
−44.4
639
60403
10364
80.000563
0.000037
0.012368
CAV2-zr13
428
6065
0.05616
0.0005
0.44375
0.0052
0.05742
0.0007
0.68
−22.3
459
42373
8360
80.001333
0.000081
0.029423
Az.
Barros
AZI4zr1a
408
5009
0.05364
0.0002
0.42257
0.0053
0.0574
0.0007
0.64
0.7
356
18358
8360
80.001728
0.000097
0.039206
AZI4zr2a
156
1501
0.05367
0.0003
0.42865
0.0055
0.0582
0.0007
0.36
1.7
357
24362
8364
80.000670
0.000038
0.015022
AZI4zr3a
512
3914
0.05401
0.0002
0.43002
0.0053
0.0580
0.0007
0.65
−2.6
371
16363
8363
80.002182
0.000123
0.049116
Alju
strel
FEV1-zr12
289
1611
0.05380
0.0002
0.43139
0.0034
0.0582
0.0004
0.70
0.5
363
16364
4364
60.001300
0.000075
0.030630
FEV1-zr18
193
20442
0.17860
0.0005
12.41971
0.0978
0.5043
0.0037
0.93
−0.3
2640
102637
142632
320.007420
0.001420
0.020199
FEV1-zr23
235
2744
0.05335
0.0003
0.43511
0.0050
0.0592
0.0005
0.41
8.1
344
24367
8371
60.001139
0.000065
0.026181
FEV1-zr24
108
1049
0.05366
0.0004
0.43129
0.0053
0.0583
0.0005
0.50
2.5
357
30364
8365
60.000516
0.000030
0.012051
FEV1-zr34b
154
2058
0.05345
0.0004
0.42740
0.0036
0.0580
0.0007
0.74
4.5
348
34361
6363
80.000764
0.000044
0.018166
FEV1-zr5
202
2064
0.05360
0.0002
0.43068
0.0032
0.0583
0.0004
0.25
3.1
354
18364
4365
40.000935
0.000054
0.021817
FEV1-zr6
150
1496
0.05366
0.0002
0.43280
0.0035
0.0585
0.0004
0.65
2.8
357
20365
4367
40.000688
0.000040
0.016102
FEV1-zr8
962896
0.05993
0.0003
0.81896
0.0067
0.0991
0.0007
0.35
1.4
601
20607
8609
80.000751
0.000048
0.010332
FEV2-zr10
208
1716
0.05374
0.0004
0.41619
0.0035
0.0562
0.0007
0.56
−2.3
360
32353
4352
80.001008
0.000057
0.023903
FEV2-zr11
431
4776
0.05403
0.0004
0.42041
0.0032
0.0564
0.0007
0.37
−5.1
372
30356
4354
80.002103
0.000119
0.049587
FEV2-zr13
207
1364
0.05409
0.0004
0.42233
0.0035
0.0566
0.0007
0.15
−5.5
375
28358
4355
80.001025
0.000058
0.023933
56 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
Tab
le2
(contin
ued)
Area
Uppm
206/204
207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/238U*
1SE
Rho
Discordance
207Pb/206Pb
2σ207Pb/235U
2σ206Pb/238U
2σVoltsignal
(backgroundcorrected)
Sam
ple/grain
%Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
206
207
238
FEV2-zr15
238
1913
0.05349
0.0004
0.41614
0.0036
0.0564
0.0007
0.63
1.2
350
30353
6354
80.001168
0.000066
0.027432
FEV2-zr17
128
1915
0.05354
0.0004
0.42723
0.0038
0.0579
0.0007
0.53
3.2
352
32361
6363
80.000648
0.000036
0.014802
FEV2-zr18
166
5174
0.05378
0.0004
0.41541
0.0037
0.0560
0.0007
0.47
−2.9
362
30353
6351
80.000813
0.000046
0.019166
FEV2-zr23
676
5062
0.05377
0.0004
0.42755
0.0037
0.0577
0.0007
0.41
.361
30361
6361
80.003414
0.000192
0.077870
FEV2-zr26
176
3034
0.05408
0.0004
0.42835
0.0039
0.0575
0.0007
0.70
−3.9
374
32362
6360
80.000883
0.000050
0.020233
FEV2-zr27
588
3695
0.05430
0.0004
0.42954
0.0034
0.0574
0.0007
0.66
−6.4
383
30363
4360
80.002933
0.000166
0.067413
FEV2-zr31
119
1848
0.05364
0.0004
0.42842
0.0039
0.0579
0.0007
0.44
2.1
356
32362
6363
80.000600
0.000034
0.013642
FEV2-zr32
123
4304
0.05451
0.0005
0.42174
0.0038
0.0561
0.0007
0.17
−10.6
392
36357
6352
80.000601
0.000034
0.014113
FEV2-zr8
167
1735
0.05406
0.0004
0.41465
0.0036
0.0556
0.0007
0.65
−6.7
374
30352
6349
80.000809
0.000046
0.019336
FEV2-zr9
184
2395
0.05429
0.0004
0.41928
0.0035
0.0560
0.0007
0.44
−8.5
383
30356
4351
80.000892
0.000051
0.021184
SJ1-zr12
801051
0.06067
0.0004
0.81045
0.0091
0.0969
0.0007
0.47
−5.2
627
28603
10596
80.000418
0.000027
0.006082
SJ1-zr15
254
1566
0.05371
0.0002
0.42009
0.0034
0.0567
0.0004
0.11
−0.9
359
18356
4356
40.000793
0.000045
0.019607
SJ1-zr17
113
2439
0.05352
0.0003
0.41409
0.0043
0.0561
0.0004
0.29
0.3
351
28352
6352
60.000352
0.000020
0.008769
SJ1-zr19
220
2318
0.05543
0.0005
0.43113
0.0055
0.0565
0.0008
0.17
−18.1
430
42364
8354
100.000959
0.000057
0.024156
SJ1-zr2
370
1064
0.05340
0.0003
0.41908
0.0038
0.0569
0.0004
0.39
3.3
346
20355
6357
40.001147
0.000065
0.028138
SJ1-zr22
214
1834
0.05360
0.0008
0.42888
0.0055
0.0581
0.0007
0.65
2.7
354
70362
8364
80.000964
0.000055
0.023862
SJ1-zr25
328
8784
0.05371
0.0009
0.42410
0.0055
0.0574
0.0007
0.76
.359
74359
8360
80.001470
0.000084
0.037017
SJ1-zr27
677
10295
0.05366
0.0010
0.41981
0.0058
0.0569
0.0008
0.83
−0.3
357
82356
8356
100.003031
0.000173
0.076894
SJ1-zr28
672866
0.05385
0.0009
0.41534
0.0056
0.0561
0.0007
0.22
−3.9
365
78353
8352
80.000293
0.000017
0.007535
SJ1-zr29
234
2723
0.05465
0.0010
0.42184
0.0064
0.0561
0.0007
0.53
−12.1
398
76357
10352
100.001022
0.000060
0.026165
SJ1-zr30
128
1652
0.05372
0.0008
0.42420
0.0054
0.0574
0.0007
0.23
−0.1
359
70359
8360
80.000571
0.000033
0.014345
SJ1-zr33
101
1549
0.05377
0.0009
0.42630
0.0055
0.0576
0.0008
0.49
−0.2
361
72361
8361
100.000455
0.000026
0.011398
SJ1-zr39
224
6408
0.06140
0.0009
0.81602
0.0109
0.0965
0.0013
0.18
−9.6
653
62606
12594
160.001679
0.000110
0.024937
SJ1-zr41
112
3437
0.06096
0.0010
0.86823
0.0122
0.1034
0.0015
0.64
−0.7
638
64635
14634
180.000897
0.000058
0.012455
SJ1-zr42
326
7256
0.05353
0.0009
0.41313
0.0053
0.0561
0.0007
0.77
−0.1
352
76351
8352
80.001427
0.000082
0.036779
SJ1-zr43
182
2579
0.05341
0.0008
0.42304
0.0056
0.0576
0.0007
0.79
4346
68358
8361
100.000811
0.000046
0.020357
SJ1-zr44
107
1271
0.05325
0.0009
0.41976
0.0061
0.0573
0.0008
0.70
5.7
339
74356
8359
100.000481
0.000027
0.012130
SJ1-zr45
601008
0.05376
0.0009
0.43135
0.0060
0.0584
0.0008
0.28
1.1
361
76364
8366
100.000272
0.000016
0.006727
SJ1-zr46
502935
0.05366
0.0011
0.42266
0.0064
0.0573
0.0007
0.43
0.3
357
86358
10359
100.000225
0.000013
0.005675
SJ1-zr47
273
1583
0.05369
0.0003
0.42295
0.0039
0.0571
0.0004
0.50
.358
22358
6358
40.000861
0.000049
0.021021
SJ1-zr5
371
5221
0.05329
0.0002
0.41746
0.0037
0.0568
0.0004
0.71
4.5
341
18354
6356
40.001154
0.000065
0.028374
SJ1-zr6
178
942
0.05898
0.0003
0.71443
0.0076
0.0879
0.0007
0.86
−4.4
567
22547
8543
80.000858
0.000054
0.013640
SJ1-zr7
447
1865
0.05342
0.0002
0.41487
0.0036
0.0563
0.0004
0.48
2346
18352
6353
40.001380
0.000078
0.034239
SJ2-zr13
199
3185
0.05408
0.0003
0.42163
0.0037
0.0566
0.0004
0.77
−5.4
374
20357
6355
40.000955
0.000056
0.022876
SJ2-zr14
114
1381
0.05367
0.0002
0.42620
0.0034
0.0576
0.0004
0.52
1.1
357
20360
4361
40.000556
0.000032
0.013001
SJ2-zr20
312
2557
0.05434
0.0002
0.45909
0.0048
0.0613
0.0006
0.92
−0.5
385
18384
6383
80.001586
0.000094
0.035022
SJ2-zr21
314
5930
0.05340
0.0002
0.43160
0.0035
0.0586
0.0004
0.69
6.4
346
20364
6367
40.001555
0.000090
0.036031
SJ2-zr23
285
1995
0.05418
0.0003
0.42174
0.0038
0.0565
0.0003
0.83
−6.6
378
22357
6354
40.001342
0.000079
0.032545
SJ2-zr24
389
3550
0.05403
0.0002
0.44221
0.0037
0.0594
0.0004
0.86
−0.2
372
14372
6372
60.001893
0.000111
0.043345
SJ2-zr26
148
1088
0.05498
0.0003
0.45194
0.0036
0.0596
0.0005
0.34
−9.5
411
22379
6373
60.000717
0.000043
0.016239
SJ2-zr27
317
3899
0.05364
0.0002
0.44025
0.0033
0.0595
0.0004
0.53
4.8
356
16370
4373
40.001538
0.000089
0.034989
SJ2-zr3
109
1885
0.05374
0.0003
0.42339
0.0035
0.0572
0.0004
0.47
−0.6
360
22358
4358
60.000549
0.000032
0.012769
Albernoa
CO5zr1a
190
3988
0.05357
0.0005
0.42887
0.0090
0.0582
0.0010
0.34
3.1
353
42362
12365
120.000781
0.000044
0.017457
CO5zr2a
331
3145
0.05421
0.0002
0.42497
0.0055
0.0571
0.0007
0.38
−6.3
380
20360
8358
80.001397
0.000079
0.032030
CO5zr4a
179
1066
0.05414
0.0003
0.40901
0.0057
0.0550
0.0007
0.53
−8.9
377
26348
8345
80.000728
0.000041
0.017352
CO5zr8a
403
25929
0.05482
0.0002
0.42732
0.0061
0.0567
0.0007
0.59
−12.8
405
20361
8356
80.001646
0.000094
0.038107
CO5zr9a
753
23412
0.05414
0.0002
0.41837
0.0048
0.0563
0.0006
0.62
−6.9
377
16355
6353
80.003071
0.000174
0.072552
CO5zr10a
330
2283
0.05453
0.0003
0.42148
0.0053
0.0563
0.0006
0.33
−10.8
393
20357
8353
80.001353
0.000077
0.031877
IP4-zr1a
748
7808
0.05326
0.0004
0.41837
0.0102
0.0568
0.0010
0.83
5.2
340
36355
14356
120.003004
0.000162
0.082052
IP4-zr2a
249
5090
0.05352
0.0004
0.42794
0.0103
0.0579
0.0010
0.66
3.6
351
34362
14363
120.001009
0.000055
0.027157
IP4zr5a
153
1513
0.05293
0.0005
0.42299
0.0105
0.0578
0.0010
0.66
11.7
326
44358
16362
120.000636
0.000034
0.017412
IP4Z
r8a
200
4953
0.05357
0.0005
0.41809
0.0029
0.0564
0.0007
0.54
0.5
353
36355
4354
80.000803
0.000044
0.021511
IP4Z
r12a
754
10016
0.05405
0.0004
0.42227
0.0024
0.0565
0.0006
0.30
−5.0
373
34358
4354
80.003037
0.000168
0.081186
IP4Z
r13a
154
8182
0.05317
0.0005
0.41958
0.0033
0.0570
0.0007
0.48
6.9
336
42356
4358
80.000624
0.000034
0.016569
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 57
Tab
le2
(contin
ued)
Area
Uppm
206/204
207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/238U*
1SE
Rho
Discordance
207Pb/206Pb
2σ207Pb/235U
2σ206Pb/238U
2σVoltsignal
(backgroundcorrected)
Sam
ple/grain
%Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
Age
(Ma)
206
207
238
IP4Z
r14a
184
2046
0.05400
0.0005
0.42525
0.0032
0.0569
0.0007
0.68
−3.6
371
36360
4357
80.000743
0.000041
0.019791
Serra
Branca
SB55zr1a
705
7788
0.05390
0.0005
0.43581
0.0021
0.0586
0.0007
0.39
0.1
367
42367
2367
80.002986
0.000165
0.081022
SB55zr2a
139
2472
0.05297
0.0006
0.43125
0.0038
0.0590
0.0007
0.50
13.3
328
52364
6369
80.000591
0.000032
0.015977
SB55zr3a
331
5968
0.05344
0.0005
0.43248
0.0028
0.0586
0.0007
0.79
6.0
347
44365
4367
80.001429
0.000079
0.038007
SB8-89,7zr1a
220
1594
0.05379
0.0003
0.41955
0.0055
0.0568
0.0007
0.70
−2.2
362
22356
8356
80.000900
0.000051
0.021318
SB8-89,7zr4a
313
6599
0.05427
0.0003
0.42398
0.0052
0.0569
0.0006
0.70
−7.3
382
22359
8357
80.001289
0.000073
0.030283
SB54zr1a
236
38323
0.18216
0.0026
13.29061
0.1346
0.5223
0.0097
0.97
3.0
2673
442701
202709
820.008127
0.001497
0.025177
SB54zr1b
107
5410
0.11917
0.0015
1.90884
0.0147
0.1167
0.0012
0.74
−67
1944
441084
10711
140.000873
0.000105
0.011960
Chança
CH601-zr1
115
1093
0.05337
0.0004
0.42034
0.0036
0.0571
0.0007
0.10
4.1
345
34356
6358
80.000559
0.000032
0.013458
CH601-zr10
183
1423
0.05343
0.0004
0.42052
0.0037
0.0571
0.0007
0.39
3.2
347
34356
6358
80.000903
0.000052
0.021579
CH601-zr13
197
1852
0.05352
0.0004
0.41304
0.0036
0.0560
0.0007
0.45
.351
32351
6351
80.000949
0.000054
0.023031
CH601-zr19
971111
0.05312
0.0004
0.41397
0.0039
0.0565
0.0007
0.46
6.4
334
34352
6354
80.000473
0.000027
0.011363
CH601-zr2
151
1146
0.05300
0.0004
0.41225
0.0034
0.0564
0.0007
0.11
7.8
329
32350
4354
80.000720
0.000041
0.017533
CH601-zr20
103
1385
0.05341
0.0004
0.42326
0.0038
0.0575
0.0007
0.55
4.2
346
34358
6360
80.000503
0.000029
0.011908
CH601-zr22
125
1308
0.05308
0.0004
0.42336
0.0037
0.0579
0.0007
0.36
9.4
332
32358
6363
80.000624
0.000035
0.014612
CH601-zr23
150
2308
0.05354
0.0004
0.42215
0.0038
0.0572
0.0007
0.24
2352
32358
6358
80.000744
0.000042
0.017567
CH601-zr24
156
1317
0.05339
0.0005
0.42712
0.0043
0.0580
0.0007
0.36
5.4
346
40361
6364
80.000778
0.000044
0.018135
CH601-zr26
150
1847
0.05353
0.0004
0.41866
0.0038
0.0567
0.0007
0.43
1.3
351
34355
6356
80.000741
0.000042
0.017614
CH601-zr27
108
1078
0.05320
0.0005
0.41797
0.0041
0.0570
0.0007
0.57
6337
38355
6357
80.000532
0.000030
0.012626
CH601-zr28
921557
0.05353
0.0004
0.41169
0.0035
0.0558
0.0007
0.69
−0.4
351
32350
6350
80.000442
0.000025
0.010717
CH601-zr29
334
2342
0.05481
0.0003
0.41950
0.0053
0.0555
0.0009
0.69
−14.3
405
24356
8348
120.001561
0.000091
0.037480
CH601-zr30
135
2823
0.05366
0.0004
0.41000
0.0035
0.0554
0.0006
0.54
−2.6
357
32349
6348
80.000638
0.000036
0.015584
CH601-zr31
142
2128
0.05361
0.0004
0.41892
0.0037
0.0567
0.0007
0.42
0.2
355
30355
6355
80.000699
0.000040
0.016561
CH601-zr32
162
1763
0.05350
0.0004
0.41421
0.0036
0.0561
0.0007
0.50
0.6
350
32352
6352
80.000783
0.000044
0.018847
CH601-zr38
178
1746
0.05364
0.0004
0.41570
0.0036
0.0562
0.0007
0.60
−1356
30353
6352
80.000870
0.000050
0.020815
CH601-zr39
333
9913
0.05375
0.0004
0.41197
0.0034
0.0556
0.0007
0.66
−3.3
360
28350
4349
80.001594
0.000091
0.038595
CH601-zr41
157
2041
0.05382
0.0004
0.41565
0.0036
0.0560
0.0007
0.51
−3.5
364
34353
6351
80.000758
0.000043
0.018218
CH601-zr42
219
4284
0.05379
0.0004
0.41459
0.0036
0.0559
0.0007
0.69
−3.3
362
30352
6351
80.001054
0.000060
0.025351
CH601-zr50
151
1498
0.05387
0.0004
0.41913
0.0039
0.0564
0.0007
0.21
−3.4
366
34355
6354
80.000740
0.000042
0.017530
CH601-zr51
166
2772
0.05412
0.0004
0.42175
0.0037
0.0565
0.0007
0.49
−5.9
376
32357
6354
80.000800
0.000046
0.019025
CH601-zr52
161
3259
0.05395
0.0004
0.41062
0.0036
0.0552
0.0007
0.23
−6.2
369
32349
6346
80.000774
0.000044
0.018705
CH601-zr54
104
1721
0.05448
0.0004
0.41522
0.0039
0.0553
0.0006
0.57
−11.6
391
32353
6347
80.000484
0.000028
0.011786
CH602-zr2
241
1659
0.05257
0.0035
0.40062
0.0122
0.0557
0.0008
0.49
12.1
310
302
342
18349
100.000779
0.000044
0.017311
CH602-zr4
144
1570
0.05381
0.0037
0.40202
0.0128
0.0546
0.0008
0.65
−6.5
363
302
343
18343
100.000459
0.000026
0.010346
CH602-zr7
503
1921
0.05404
0.0037
0.41514
0.0137
0.0563
0.0008
0.73
−6.3
373
294
353
20353
100.001671
0.000097
0.036179
CH602-zr9
721057
0.05584
0.0040
0.42752
0.0153
0.0562
0.0009
0.57
−22.5
446
328
361
22352
100.000239
0.000014
0.005156
Lousal
LR23zr1a
637
108469
0.13224
0.0008
6.74812
0.1848
0.3701
0.0085
0.93
−5.4
2128
202079
482030
800.017559
0.002410
0.059075
LR23zr3a
392855
0.10996
0.0007
4.88560
0.1119
0.3219
0.0069
0.70
0.1
1799
201800
381799
660.000930
0.000106
0.003614
LR23zr4a
105
690
0.05956
0.0003
0.77950
0.0118
0.0952
0.0013
0.47
−0.6
588
22585
14586
140.000743
0.000046
0.009939
LR23zr5a
445
7077
0.06057
0.0002
0.85274
0.0123
0.1023
0.0014
0.75
0.4
624
14626
14628
160.003400
0.000215
0.042249
LR23zr6a
156
14600
0.14762
0.0008
8.36275
0.2369
0.4114
0.0092
0.93
−5.1
2319
182271
522221
840.004827
0.000740
0.014693
LR23zr7a
596
3699
0.06151
0.0002
0.85435
0.0117
0.1010
0.0013
0.81
−6.1
657
12627
12620
160.004482
0.000288
0.056881
LR23zr9a
197
6828
0.16377
0.0008
10.40116
0.3174
0.4618
0.0104
0.94
−2.5
2495
162471
562447
920.006907
0.001176
0.018830
LR23zr10a
743459
0.13221
0.0006
6.65939
0.1463
0.3655
0.0070
0.75
−6.6
2127
162067
382008
660.002046
0.000282
0.007090
58 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
with sufficient precision to be used in the isobaric overlapcorrection procedure at mass 176 (e.g. Woodhead et al.2004). The isobaric interferences on 176Hf by 176Lu and176Yb were therefore corrected by an empirical procedure
similar to that of Griffin et al. (2000), using the observedmass discrimination for Hf as a proxy for those of Lu andYb. The value of the 176Yb/172Yb ratio to be used in thecorrection procedure was determined from multiple laser
390
3600.057
0.059
0.061
0.063
0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Cercal (CE1) Concordia Age=374.3±1.6 Ma (2 σ , , decay-const. errs ignored) MSWD (of concordance)=0.21,
Probability (of concordance)=0.65
358
382
386
0.057
0.058
0.059
0.060
0.061
0.062
0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Cercal (CE4) Concordia Age=369.50±0.85 Ma
(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.086,Probability(of concordance)=0.77
380 370 360 350
0.054
0.058
0.062
0.066
16.2 16.6 17.0 17.4 17.8238U/206Pb
207 P
b/20
6 Pb
380
370
3400.055
0.057
0.059
0.061
0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Aljustrel (SJ1)Concordia Age=356.5±1.3 Ma(2σ, decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.67,Prob. (of concordance)=0.41
390
350
0.057
0.059
0.061
0.063
0.41 0.43 0.45207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Cercal (CE2) Conc. Age=371.1±1.2 Ma (2 σ , decay-const. errs ignored) MSWD (of concordance)=0.89,
Probability (of concordance)=0.35
390
360
0.058
0.060
0.062
0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46
207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Cercal (CE3) Concordia Age=371.6±1.0 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.70,
Probability (of concordance)=0.40
376
372
368
364
360
356
352
348
0.055
0.056
0.057
0.058
0.059
0.060
0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Azinheira dos Barros (AZI4)Concordia Age=361.8±4.0 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.37,
Probability (of concordance)=0.54
344
348
352
356
360
364
0.054
0.055
0.056
0.057
0.058
0.059
0.060
0.41 0.42 0.43207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Aljustrel (FEV2)Concordia Age=354.6 ±1.7 Ma(2σ, decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=2.3,
Probability (of concordance)=0.13
Caveira (CAV2)
a b
c d
e f
g h
Fig. 3 Concordia diagrams ofCercal, Caveira, Azinheira deBarros and Aljustrel samples
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 59
ablation analyses of grains of the Temora-2 reference zirconwhich show a range of 176Yb/177Hf ratios of ca. 0.01 to 0.1.This procedure was chosen in order to avoid the matrix-dependent mass discrimination problems encountered when
using data from aqueous Yb-spiked Hf standard solutions tocorrect laser ablation analyses (e.g. Iizuka and Hirata 2005).The resulting 176Yb/172Yb=0.58707 is within the range ofpublished isotope ratios for natural Yb (Chu et al. 2002;
366
362
358
354
3500.056
0.057
0.058
0.414 0.418 0.422 0.426 0.430 0.434207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Aljustrel (SJ2)Concordia Age=356.6±2.1 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=7.4,
Probability (of concordance)=0.006
380
370
360
350
340
0.055
0.057
0.059
0.40 0.42 0.44207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Albernoa (IP4) Conc. Age=357.2±2.0 Ma(2 σ , decay-const. errs ignored)
MSWD (of concordance)=0.077,Probability(of concordance)=0.78
360
364
368
372
0.058
0.059
0.060
0.061
0.062
0.424 0.428 0.432 0.436 0.440207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Serra Branca (SB55)Concordia Age=365.8±2.1 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=1.8,
Probability (of concordance)=0.18
360
350
340
330
0.054
0.056
0.058
0.37 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Chança (CH602) Conc. Age=349.0±4.9 Ma (2 σ , decay-const. errs ignored)
MSWD (of concordance)=0.0088,Probability (of concordance)=0.93
378
374
370
366
362
358
354
3500.0565
0.0575
0.0585
0.0595
0.0605
0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Aljustrel (FEV1) Concordia Age=364.0 ±1.7 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored) MSWD (of concordance)=2.1,
Probability (of concordance)=0.14
380
360
3400.054
0.058
0.062
0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Albernoa (CO5)Concordia Age = 355.4 ±2.9 Ma(2s, decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance) = 2.5,
Probability (of concordance) = 0.11
366
362
358
35
350
3460.055
0.056
0.057
0.058
0.41 0.42 0.43207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Serra Branca (SB8-89,7)Concordia Age=356.9±5.0 Ma(2σ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.22,
Probability(of concordance)=0.64
372
368
360
3400.054
0.056
0.058
0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
Chança (CH601) Conc. Age=353.9±1.1 Ma (2σ ,decay-const. errs ignored)MSWD (of concordance)=0.058,
Probability (of concordance)=0.81
0.44
a b
c d
e f
g h
Fig. 4 Concordia diagrams ofAljustrel (continuation),Albernoa, Serra Branca andChanca samples
60 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
Segal et al. 2003). Once established, this correctionprocedure shows good long-term stability, as seen from theresults for reference zircons run as unknowns (Appendix,Table 5). Most significantly, there is no correlation betweencorrected 176Hf/177Hf and 176Yb/177Hf, suggesting that nosystematic bias is caused by under- or overcorrection forinterferences at 176Yb/177Hf≤0.1 (Appendix, Fig. 10).
Avalue for the decay constant of 176Lu of 1.867×10−11 a−1
has been used in all calculations (Söderlund et al. 2004;Scherer et al. 2001, 2007). For the calculation of ɛHf valueswe use present-day chondritic 176Hf/177Hf=0.282802 and176Lu/177Hf=0.0337 (Bouvier et al. 2007). We have adoptedthe depleted mantle model of Griffin et al. (2000) modifiedto the λ176Lu used, which produces a value of 176Hf/177Hf(0.28325, ɛHf=+16) similar to that of average MORB over4.56 Ga, from chondritic initial hafnium at 176Lu/177HfDM=0.0384. This mantle evolution curve is indistinguishablefrom the fLu/Hf=0.16 (i.e. 176Lu/177Hf=0.038) curve ofVervoort & Blichert-Toft (1999).
Standards/reference zircons 91500, Temora-2, Mud Tankand GJ-1 were run as unknowns at frequent intervals. Thedata obtained over a 2-year period indicates excellentaccuracy and an external reproducibility of ±0.000050 (2SD) on the low-REE Mud Tank zircon, and somewhathigher (±0.000065) on the Temora-2 zircon, which hashigher and more variable Yb/Hf (Appendix, Table 5). In thisstudy, a value of ±0.000065 is used as a conservativeestimate of the external reproducibility of the method. Forstandard zircon 91500, we have observed an isotopicheterogeneity similar to that reported by Griffin et al.(2006), which accounts for the worse precision of thatreference sample.
Geochronology
The U–Pb analytical results, for zircon grains from samplesrepresentative of each of the volcanic rock types and of thePQ Formation sample, are compiled in Table 2. U–Pb ageswere calculated using ISOPLOT version 3 (Ludwig 2003),with errors reported at 95% (±2σ) confidence level. Manyzircons in these samples have elevated concentrations ofcommon lead which could not be adequately corrected fromthe observed 206/204 ratios, and which do not definediscordia lines anchored at common lead in a Tera–Wasserburg diagram. Such analyses have been discarded.
The four samples from Cercal, despite having beencollected throughout a rather wide area, provided similarages. Sample CE1 provided 16 concordant grains yielding andage of 374±2Ma (Fig. 3a). Sample CE2 yielded 35 concordantzircon grains, resulting in an age of 371±1 Ma (Fig. 3b).Sample CE3 yielded 36 concordant zircon grains that providean age of 372±1 Ma (Fig. 3c). Sample CE4 was dated at 370±1 Ma, based on 30 concordant zircon grains (Fig. 3d).
In Caveira, only one sample was collected (CAV2), whichyielded zircon grains with substantial amounts of commonlead. On a Tera–Wasserburg diagram the grains define a linewith an unprecise upper intercept (representing commonlead) and a lower intercept at 361±4 Ma, considered the bestestimate for the emplacement of this rock (Fig. 3e).
Three zircons from sample AZI4, from Azinheira deBarros, are concordant at 362±4 Ma, dating the emplace-ment of this rock type (Fig. 3f).
Three of the samples collected in Aljustrel have statisti-cally identical ages; the fine-grained quartz-feldspar-phyricporphyry (FEV2) was dated at 355±2 Ma, based on eightconcordant zircon grains (Fig. 3g), while the megacrystporphyry samples were dated at 356±1 and 357±2 Ma,
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 Udata-point error ellipses are 2σ
670
650
630
610
590
570
550
5300.086
0.090
0.094
0.098
0.102
0.106
0.66 0.70 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 0.94
SB54
CE1
FEV1
FEV1
SJ1
SJ1
Fig. 5 Compilation of pre-Variscan inherited zircon grains identifiedduring this study
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
600
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14207Pb/ 235U
206 P
b/23
8 U
data-point error ellipses are 2σ
570
590
610
630
650
0.094
0.098
0.102
0.106
0.72 0.76 0.80 0.84 0.88 0.92
Fig. 6 Concordia diagram for detrital zircon grains from sample LR23 (PQ Formation from Lousal)
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 61
based on 19 and four concordant zircon grains, for SJ1 andSJ2, respectively (Figs. 3h and 4a). The coarse-grainedporphyry (FEV1) is significantly older, being dated at 364±2 Ma, based on seven concordant zircon grains (Fig. 4b).
Aljustrel is particular in the sense that two of its youngersamples contain inherited, but still Variscan, zircon grains.In sample FEV2, in addition to the zircon grains mentionedabove that provide an age for the emplacement of themagma, five zircons grains were identified which define a
concordia age of 362±2 Ma. In sample SJ2, two earlierVariscan zircon fractions were identified, one at 384±7 Ma(one grain) and another at 373±3 Ma (three grains).
The best estimate of the crystallization age of samplesCO5 and IP4, both quartz-feldspar-phyric porphyries fromAlbernoa, is provided by two concordia ages of 355±3 and356±2 Ma, based on six and seven concordant analyses,respectively (Fig. 4c and d). A weighted mean of 356±2 Ma for the emplacement of this rock was calculated.
Table 3 Lu-Hf zircon data
AreaSample/grain
U–Pbage(Ma)
176Hf/177Hf 2σ(int. prec.)
176Yb/177Hf 2σ 176Lu/177Hf 2σ 176Hf/177Hf(initial)
Epsilon(initial)
Protolithage (Ga)
CercalCE4-zr116 370 0.282765 0.000022 0.109 0.001 0.00154 0.00002 0.282754 6.6 0.89Azinheira de BarrosAZI4zr2b 362 0.282565 0.000040 0.067 0.004 0.00158 0.00012 0.282555 −0.7 1.34AljustrelFEV1-zr1b 364 0.282519 0.000028 0.068 0.005 0.00103 0.00007 0.282512 −2.1 1.44FEV1-zr8b 355 0.282506 0.000024 0.028 0.004 0.00045 0.00008 0.282503 −2.7 1.46FEV1-zr18b 2639inh 0.280986 0.000022 0.037 0.001 0.00059 0.00002 0.280956 −5.1 3.41FEV1-zr19b 364 0.282553 0.000030 0.116 0.008 0.00170 0.00020 0.282541 −1.1 1.37FEV1-zr34c 364 0.282538 0.000040 0.049 0.008 0.00062 0.00010 0.282534 −1.4 1.39FEV2-zr14b 355 0.282796 0.000026 0.092 0.010 0.00151 0.00030 0.282786 7.4 0.83FEV2-zr31b 362 0.282674 0.000022 0.098 0.007 0.00158 0.00011 0.282663 3.2 1.1FEV2-zr32b 355 0.282780 0.000034 0.087 0.007 0.00133 0.00015 0.282771 6.8 0.86SJ1-zr3b 356 0.282649 0.000026 0.107 0.006 0.00146 0.00005 0.282639 2.2 1.16SJ1-zr7b 356 0.282394 0.000036 0.085 0.013 0.00143 0.00026 0.282384 −6.8 1.73SJ1-zr15b 356 0.282132 0.000078 0.031 0.001 0.00043 0.00003 0.282129 −15.9 2.29SJ1-zr41b 356 0.282541 0.000030 0.092 0.005 0.00137 0.00013 0.282532 −1.6 1.4SJ1-zr42b 356 0.282510 0.000024 0.027 0.001 0.00042 0.00006 0.282507 −2.5 1.45SJ1-zr44b 356 0.282582 0.000030 0.084 0.014 0.00117 0.00020 0.282574 −0.1 1.3SJ2-zr3b 357 0.282549 0.000040 0.112 0.014 0.00187 0.00036 0.282536 −1.4 1.39SJ2-zr12b 357 0.282648 0.000026 0.115 0.009 0.00171 0.00009 0.282637 2.1 1.16AlbernoaCO5zr2b 355 0.282656 0.000040 0.091 0.002 0.00186 0.00011 0.282643 2.3 1.15CO5zr4b 355 0.282645 0.000040 0.049 0.002 0.00093 0.00003 0.282639 2.2 1.16CO5zr5b 355 0.282616 0.000040 0.069 0.002 0.00132 0.00006 0.282607 1 1.23CO5zr6b 355 0.282597 0.000040 0.082 0.004 0.00167 0.00016 0.282586 0.3 1.28CO5zr8c 355 0.282582 0.000040 0.068 0.001 0.00137 0.00005 0.282573 −0.2 1.31CO5zr10c 355 0.282573 0.000040 0.058 0.009 0.00115 0.00011 0.282566 −0.4 1.32Serra BrancaSB8-89,7zr1b 357 0.282608 0.000040 0.065 0.004 0.00158 0.00015 0.282597 0.7 1.25SB8-89,7zr3b 357 0.282650 0.000040 0.056 0.006 0.00156 0.00015 0.282639 2.2 1.16ChançaCH601-zr19b 354 0.282554 0.000028 0.078 0.002 0.00127 0.00009 0.282546 −1.2 1.37CH601-zr26b 354 0.282596 0.000022 0.074 0.003 0.00115 0.00001 0.282588 0.3 1.27CH601-zr28b 354 0.282540 0.000022 0.060 0.003 0.00101 0.00010 0.282533 −1.6 1.4CH601-zr41b 354 0.282538 0.000022 0.060 0.004 0.00099 0.00009 0.282531 −1.7 1.4CH601-zr46 354 0.282640 0.000030 0.088 0.003 0.00137 0.00004 0.282631 1.9 1.18CH601-zr57 354 0.282599 0.000026 0.063 0.003 0.00096 0.00003 0.282593 0.5 1.26Lousal (PQ)LR23zr7b 626 0.282545 0.000040 0.077 0.004 0.00153 0.00011 0.282527 4.3 1.24LR23zr9b 2493 0.281023 0.000040 0.021 0.002 0.00044 0.00005 0.281002 −6.9 3.4
inh Pre-Variscan Inherited grain
62 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
At Serra Branca, three zircon grains from sample SB55, aquartz-feldspar-phyric porphyry, yielded a concordia age of366±2 Ma (Fig. 4e). A later stage at Serra Branca is markedby emplacement of microporphyry cryptodomes. A sampleof this micropophyry (sample SB8-89.7) yielded two zircongrains with a concordia age of 357±5 Ma (Fig. 4f).
In Chança, 24 concordant zircon grains provided an ageof 354±1 Ma for sample CH601 (Fig. 4g), while fourconcordant zircon grains provided an age of 349±5 Ma forsample CH602 (Fig. 4h).
In addition to the inherited, but still Variscan, zircongrains identified and discussed above, some samples con-tained pre-Variscan inherited grains, with Neo-Proterozoic,Paleo-Proterozoic and Archean ages (compiled in Fig. 5).The Late Archean inherited core at 2698±6 Ma fromsample SB54, has a rim which is strongly discordant alonga line to a lower intercept at ca. 365 Ma.
Finally, reconnaissance analyses of eight detrital zircongrains from the PQ Formation (sample LR23, from Lousal)yielded three Late Neo-Proterozoic ages and five Paleo-Proterozoic to Archean ages (Fig. 6). The Paleo-Proterozoicto Archean zircons are often orange to brown and rounded,in contrast to the clear or pale pink and more euhedral Neo-Proterozoic zircons.
Hafnium isotopes
The measured ratios are compiled in Table 3. Epsilonvalues were calculated using the chondritic values ofBouvier et al. (2007). Most of the present-day 176Hf/177Hf0ratios of the magmatic zircons fit a relatively narrow rangefrom 0.282394 to 0.282796, corresponding to ɛHf0 between−14.4 and −0.2, with an outlier at 0.282132 (ɛHf0=−23.7).A Paleo-Proterozoic detrital zircon grain from the PQFormation sample (LR23) has a present-day 176Hf/177Hf0ratio of 0.281023 (ɛHf0=−62.9), while an Late Neo-Proterozoic grain from the same formation has a present-day 176Hf/177Hf0 ratio of 0.282545 (ɛHf0=−9.1).
Initial isotope ratios, accommodating decay of 176Lu→176Hf,were estimated for the time of zircon crystallization,using the U–Pb ages (see above). The magmatic zirconshave initial 176Hf/177Hfi ratios within a narrow rangefrom 0.282384 to 0.282786, which corresponds to a ɛHfinterval between −6.8 and 7.4 (with the outlier at0.282129, or at ɛHf=−15.9). The PQ Formation LateNeo-Proterozoic detrital zircon has a 176Hf/177Hfi ratio of0.282527 (ɛHf=4.3), while the Paleo-Proterozoic detritalzircon has a 176Hf/177Hfi ratio of 0.281002 (ɛHf=−6.9).Figure 7 shows these results and how they relate with thechondritic uniform reservoir and with the depleted-mantlereservoir. The evolution of the depleted-mantle reservoirwas calculated using present-day values of 176Hf/177Hf0=0.283251 and 176Lu/177Hf0=0.0384 (Griffin et al. 2006).
Discussion
The magmatic zircon morphology, as established bycathodoluminescence studies, reflects the cooling of amagma of crustal origin, supporting the prevailing viewon the petrogenesis of IPB felsic volcanic rocks, whichsuggests that these rocks were formed by crustal fusioncaused by underplating and the invasion of the crust bymafic magmas (Munhá 1983; Mitjavila et al. 1997;Thiéblemont et al. 1998).
The U–Pb age estimates obtained for the magmaticzircons straddle the period between the Famennian (LateDevonian) and the Tournaisian (Early Carboniferous).These ages complement data reported by Nesbitt et al.(1999), Dunning et al. (2002) and Barrie et al. (2002). Asummary of all U–Pb data to date is presented in Fig. 8.This compilation indicates a duration of volcanism in theIPB of between 24 and 35 Ma, with volcanism lasting for atleast 7 Ma in a single location, as documented in Aljustrel.Clearly, the more data that are obtained, the more complex thesuccession of volcanic events will appear, both within a singlevolcanic edifice at each location and from one location to
0.2810
0.2815
0.2820
0.2825
0.2830
0.2835
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40.35 0.4
Time (Ga)
0.2820
0.2830
0.2825
176 Hf
/177 Hf
(t)
176 Hf
/177 Hf
(t)
DM
CHUR
Fig. 7 Epsilon Hf data of magmatic zircons plotted against theirzircon U–Pb age, with CHUR and DM evolution lines (excluding pre-Variscan inherited grains). Dashed line is projection of the average
initial isotopic composition towards the DM line, via an intermediatereservoir with 176Lu/177Hf=0.015, which provides an average proto-lith age of ca. 1.4 Ga
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 63
another, at the basin scale. This warrants improved strati-graphic control. However, from all the results gathered to date,it appears that the volcanism has migrated within the basinperpendicularly to the suture from the present-day southwestto the northeast. The oldest volcanism is recorded in Cercal,while the volcanism in the Spanish sector of the Belt issignificantly younger, with remaining Portuguese areas regis-tering intermediate ages. This observation is not consistentwith a model of central uplift and intense volcanic activity nearwhat is now the Portuguese–Spanish border, with subsequentmigration of the already formed volcanic edifices towards thebasins’ margins, to the east and to the west, as suggested byBarrie et al. (2002). Instead, the inferred migration confirmsthe trend suggested by Carvalho (1976), based on thecompilation of paleontological dates for sediments enclosingthe volcanic rocks. However, this trend should not beassigned as the result of northward-dipping subduction tothe south of the Belt, as implied by Carvalho (1976), becauseample evidence linking the volcanism to extensional tectonicshas been published recently (see “Geochemistry and petrog-raphy of the volcanic rocks” above).
The two magmatic zircon generations, identified by CL, donot significantly vary in their initial Hf ratios. This indicatesthat no magma mixing from distinct sources occurred duringzircon crystallization. Protolith model ages for the magmaticzircons, calculated via an intermediate reservoir with anaverage Lu/Hf (176Lu/177Hf=0.015) as outlined in Andersenet al. (2002), provide ages which are predominantly Meso-Proterozoic, averaging 1.4 Ga (Table 3, Fig. 7). As expected,the higher epsilon values (more radiogenic) correspond to theyoungest ages and the lower epsilon values (less radiogenic)correspond to the oldest ages.
No possible juvenile crustal sources are known in theIPB. The base of the PQ Formation is not known and this
formation has a thickness of more than 2000 m (Tornos etal. 2005). Therefore, the PQ Formation may be considereda possible crustal source for the IPB acid magmas. The linkbetween the PQ Formation and metals in the massive sulfidedeposits has already been established by Jorge et al. (2007),based on lead isotope data. If the crustal source for the IPBacid magmas was the PQ Formation, or some othermetasedimentary rock assemblage, implying that there werecycles of erosion and sedimentation before fusion, the modelages should be interpreted with caution. This is becausesedimentary processes result in sediments with several crustalprovenances and fusion of such sediments generates melts inwhich the crystallizing zircons adopt Hf isotope ratios that aremixtures of the various sources involved. In this case, modelages may not necessarily indicate crust-formation events.Considering that the PQ Formation has detrital zirconpopulations with Late Neo-Proterozoic and also Paleo-Proterozoic to Archean ages, its fusion would yield magmaswith Hf crustal residence ages which are intermediate andconsistent with the data (i.e. Meso- Proterozoic). Also, thevolcanic rocks, while containing inherited zircons with LateNeo- Proterozoic and also Paleo-Proterozoic to Archean ages,also appear to lack inherited Meso-Proterozoic zircons, exactlyas recorded for the PQ Formation (Figs. 5 and 6). Hence thePQ Formation remains a likely source for the IPB magmas,although other unknown sources cannot be excluded.
Once formed, the acid magma has locally promotedremelting of older igneous rocks, as inferred from thepresence of inherited Variscan zircon grains in Aljustrelsamples. The recycling of recently-formed igneous rocksimplies a sustained heat flow which is favorable to thedevelopment of VMS deposits, such as the ones at Aljustrel.Therefore, the presence of recycled Variscan zircons isindicative of sustained heat flow and should be considered a
340
345
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
U-P
b A
ge
Caveira
Southwest Northeast
Cercal
Azinheira
de Barros
Lagoa
Salgada
Aljustrel
Albernoa
Serra Branca
Chança
Rio
Tinto
Nerva
Los
Frailes
Las
Cruces
Zufre
Fig. 8 Summary of U–Pb agedeterminations. Complementingdata presented in this study are;from Barrie et al. (2002) forLagoa Salgada, Aljustrel, RioTinto and Las Cruces, fromDunning et al. (2002) for Nervaand Zufre and from Nesbitt et al.(1999) for Los Frailes. Samesymbols as in Fig. 1
64 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
potential exploration criterium for VMS deposits. Thisshould be coupled with zircon saturation temperatureinformation, as outlined by Rosa et al. (2006).
Conclusions
The zircon morphology indicates that the IPB acid magmaswere of crustal origin. The Hf protolith model ages, which werecalculated using magmatic zircon from the Volcano SiliceousComplex are intermediate between the zircon U–Pb agepopulations recorded in the sample of the Phyllite-QuartziteFormation, consistent with the hypothesis that this formationwas the source for the IPB acid magmas. This is furthersupported by the absence of inherited Meso-Proterozoiczircons in the volcanic rocks. The acid magmas weresubsequently emplaced from the Famennian through theTournaisian. When compared with the previously publishedage data, it appears that volcanism migrated perpendicularlyto the suture, i.e. southwest to the northeast of the IPB basin(present day coordinates).
Acknowledgements This work was sponsored by an InternationalIncoming Short Visits grant from the Royal Society, by an EFTAGrant and by the POCTI program of the Fundação para a Ciência eTecnologia (Portugal). This work is a contribution of DRN Rosatowards FCT project POCI/CTE-GIN/56450/2004 “PYBE-Towards aBetter Understanding of the Pyrite Belt Basin Evolution”. The authorswould like to acknowledge Donald Herd (University of St Andrews)and Berit Løken Berg, Gunborg Bye-Fjeld and Jarkko Lamminen(University of Oslo) for assistance with sample preparation andcharacterization and Siri Simonsen (University of Oslo) for herassistance during LA-ICP-MS work. Further laboratory support wasprovided by the CREMINER-Centro de Recursos Minerais, Miner-alogia e Cristalografia, at the University of Lisbon. DRN Rosa wouldlike to acknowledge the fruitful discussions with João Matos, JoséTomás Oliveira and Carlos Rosa.
Appendix
084
044
004
063
023
082
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
. 26085.045.0. 05064.0. 24083.034.003.0702 /bP 532 U
206 P
b/23
8 U
2-aromeT
aidrocnoC aM 1.1± 2.814 = egA
2( σ , )derongi srre .tsnoc-yaced
DWSM ,7800.0 = )ecnadrocnoc fo(
ytilibaborP 39.0 = )ecnadrocnoc fo(
04=n
PlesoviceaidrocnoC aM 7.0± 3.933 = egA
2( σ, )derongi srre .tsnoc-yaced
DWSM ,71.1 = )ecnadrocnoc fo(
ytilibaborP 82.0 = )ecnadrocnoc fo(
85=n
^
Fig. 9 Reference zircons Temora-2 (TIMS-ID U–Pb age: 416.8±1.3 Ma; Black et al. 2004) and Plešovice (TIMS-ID U–Pb age: 337.1±0.4 Ma; Sláma et al. 2008) measured as unknowns
0.2819
0.2821
0.2823
0.2825
0.2827
0.2829
0.120.100.080.060.040.020.00
176Yb/177Hf
(laitini) fH771/fH671
-aromeT
Mud Tank
GJ-
91500
Fig. 10 Hf isotopic composi-tion of reference samples MudTank, Temora-2, 91500 and GJ-1 measured as unknowns duringa 2 year period
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 65
Tab
le4
U–P
bdata
forstandard
zircon
sTem
ora-2andPlešovice
measuredas
unkn
owns
Sam
ple
Analysisid.
Upp
m206Pb
206/20
4207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/
238U*
1SE
Rho
207Pb/
206Pb
age(M
a)2σ
207Pb/235U
age(M
a)2σ
206Pb/238U
age(M
a)2σ
Calibratio
nstandards
Tem
ora2
TEM-01
483.2
341
0.05
600.00
060.51
370.00
730.06
670.00
080.56
450
4842
110
416
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-02
523.4
856
0.05
570.00
070.51
590.00
730.06
720.00
080.41
442
4842
210
419
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-03
573.7
792
0.05
570.00
060.51
710.00
640.06
740.00
080.43
442
4442
38
420
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-05
139
8.8
2514
0.05
540.00
050.50
910.00
630.06
670.00
080.33
430
4441
88
416
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-06
137
8.7
1901
0.05
550.00
050.50
950.00
600.06
670.00
080.61
432
3641
88
416
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-07
895.5
1176
0.05
490.00
060.49
920.00
660.06
610.00
080.22
408
44411
841
310
GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-08
122
7.6
2170
0.05
490.00
050.50
550.00
630.06
690.00
090.60
410
4041
58
417
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-09
203
12.6
3592
0.05
480.00
050.51
520.00
710.06
830.00
100.85
406
3842
210
426
12GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-04
654.1
919
0.05
550.00
060.51
080.01
300.06
700.00
180.22
431
4241
918
418
22GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-01
956.2
1040
0.05
520.00
050.50
690.01
230.06
660.00
170.33
422
4241
616
416
20GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-02
785
4386
0.05
550.00
060.50
710.01
250.06
630.00
170.24
433
4641
616
414
20GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-03
249
15.7
1212
10.05
520.00
050.51
300.01
280.06
760.00
180.27
421
3842
018
422
22GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-006
113
7.3
1356
0.05
520.00
100.51
860.00
560.06
840.00
080.60
421
8242
48
427
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-004
553.5
1305
0.05
530.00
110.51
600.00
560.06
780.00
070.31
424
8642
28
423
8GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-01
623.9
561
0.05
520.00
060.50
470.00
660.06
640.00
080.58
420
4841
58
414
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-02
674.2
693
0.05
600.00
060.51
370.00
660.06
660.00
080.34
452
5042
18
416
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-03
462.8
745
0.05
610.00
070.50
920.00
720.06
600.00
080.51
457
5241
810
412
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-04
633.9
1000
0.05
550.00
060.51
580.00
690.06
750.00
080.29
434
5042
210
421
10GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-001
835.3
1158
0.05
520.00
060.51
740.00
410.06
800.00
040.61
422
4642
36
424
6GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-002
946.1
3963
90.05
510.00
060.51
570.00
390.06
800.00
030.15
414
4842
26
424
4GJ-1,
9150
0Tem
ora2
TEM-004
116
7.5
1411
0.05
540.00
060.51
550.00
400.06
760.00
030.24
426
4642
26
422
4GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-02
718
39.1
1748
50.05
330.00
020.39
430.00
480.05
370.00
060.34
341
2033
88
337
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-03
599
32.2
7553
0.05
260.00
020.38
400.00
480.05
300.00
060.53
311
1833
08
333
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-04
479
25.7
4916
0.05
280.00
030.38
460.00
490.05
290.00
060.45
319
2233
08
332
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-05
351
18.9
3215
0.05
400.00
030.39
410.00
510.05
300.00
060.42
370
2233
78
333
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-06
470
25.3
2305
0.05
300.00
020.38
710.00
490.05
300.00
060.24
328
2033
28
333
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-07
665
36.8
2140
70.05
320.00
020.39
790.00
520.05
430.00
070.49
337
1834
08
341
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-08
545
30.1
4586
0.05
430.00
020.40
500.00
530.05
410.00
070.55
385
2034
58
339
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-09
559
31.1
2638
0.05
330.00
030.39
930.00
540.05
430.00
070.30
342
2034
18
341
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-10
652
36.7
3483
30.05
320.00
020.40
280.00
550.05
490.00
070.59
336
2034
48
345
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-01
566
3118
392
0.05
390.00
030.40
190.00
500.05
410.00
060.53
368
2034
38
339
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-01
723
39.3
3957
30.05
350.00
020.39
370.00
450.05
340.00
050.51
350
1833
76
335
6GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-02
720
3943
400.05
360.00
020.39
330.00
450.05
320.00
050.45
355
1833
76
334
6GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-03
642
34.9
6693
0.05
340.00
020.39
310.00
470.05
340.00
050.53
345
2033
76
335
6GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-04
500
27.5
5210
0.05
360.00
030.39
850.00
480.05
390.00
050.32
353
2234
16
339
6GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-03
598
32.2
6693
0.05
330.00
020.38
910.00
320.05
290.00
030.53
343
2033
44
332
4GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-04
465
25.3
5210
0.05
350.00
030.39
420.00
330.05
340.00
030.32
351
2233
74
336
4GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-05
712
38.9
5926
0.05
290.00
020.39
120.00
320.05
360.00
040.60
324
1833
54
337
4GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-07
499
27.4
4971
0.05
300.00
020.39
440.00
330.05
390.00
030.40
330
1833
84
339
4GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-08
507
27.9
6763
0.05
330.00
020.39
680.00
330.05
400.00
040.49
342
2033
94
339
4GJ-1
66 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
Tab
le4
(con
tinued)
Sam
ple
Analysisid.
Upp
m206Pb
206/20
4207Pb/206Pb*
1SE
207Pb/235U*
1SE
206Pb/
238U*
1SE
Rho
207Pb/
206Pb
age(M
a)2σ
207Pb/235U
age(M
a)2σ
206Pb/238U
age(M
a)2σ
Calibratio
nstandards
Plešovice
PL-01
679
37.4
3621
0.05
290.00
050.39
450.00
740.05
410.00
110.49
324
4233
810
340
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-02
722
39.5
9095
0.05
260.00
050.38
960.00
730.05
380.00
110.53
310
4233
410
338
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-03
996
54.5
9199
0.05
260.00
050.38
960.00
730.05
370.00
110.66
313
4033
410
337
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-04
859
46.4
7668
0.05
270.00
050.38
600.00
720.05
320.00
110.75
315
4233
110
334
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-05
695
37.2
1015
40.05
300.00
050.38
360.00
730.05
250.00
110.59
328
4233
010
330
12GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-06
683
36.7
3863
0.05
300.00
050.38
530.00
730.05
280.00
110.50
328
4233
110
331
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-07
920
49.2
7260
0.05
300.00
050.38
390.00
730.05
250.00
110.72
329
4233
010
330
12GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-08
938
50.1
5484
0.05
310.00
050.38
420.00
730.05
250.00
110.68
331
4233
010
330
12GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-09
756
4240
350.05
240.00
050.39
350.00
760.05
450.00
110.75
301
4233
712
342
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-10
883
49.6
5387
0.05
240.00
050.39
800.00
760.05
510.00
110.44
302
4234
012
346
14GJ-1
Plešovice
PLZ-02
706
36.5
8902
0.05
330.00
100.39
230.00
500.05
350.00
070.85
340
7833
68
336
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-03
441
2374
000.05
300.00
100.39
630.00
550.05
440.00
070.47
330
8233
98
342
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PLZ-01
617
3222
499
0.05
310.00
100.39
240.00
500.05
370.00
070.74
334
8033
68
337
8GJ-1
Plešovice
PL-01
348
18.9
2315
0.05
260.00
040.39
950.00
440.05
520.00
070.33
313
3634
16
346
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-02
400
21.3
4682
0.05
330.00
040.39
860.00
430.05
430.00
060.22
343
3634
16
341
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-03
396
2110
329
0.05
310.00
040.40
160.00
430.05
500.00
070.58
333
3834
36
345
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-05
721
37.2
5712
0.05
320.00
040.39
900.00
430.05
450.00
070.26
339
3634
16
342
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-07
809
40.9
4131
0.05
270.00
040.39
440.00
440.05
440.00
070.11
316
3633
86
342
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-08
719
36.2
2937
0.05
310.00
040.39
540.00
440.05
410.00
070.28
334
3433
86
340
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-09
717
36.2
4188
0.05
260.00
040.39
990.00
480.05
530.00
070.16
313
3434
26
347
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-10
674
34.1
7992
0.05
260.00
040.40
050.00
490.05
540.00
070.41
311
3434
28
348
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-01
421
22.4
2745
0.05
340.00
050.40
160.00
950.05
460.00
130.50
347
3834
314
343
16GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-02
568
30.2
4160
0.05
330.00
050.40
050.00
940.05
460.00
130.69
339
3834
214
343
16GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-03
553
28.2
3906
90.05
300.00
050.39
930.00
970.05
490.00
140.37
328
3834
114
344
16GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-04
642
32.7
9923
0.05
330.00
050.40
090.00
980.05
480.00
140.71
343
3834
214
344
18GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-05
795
40.7
4961
0.05
330.00
050.40
340.00
990.05
520.00
140.81
340
3634
414
346
18GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-001
380
19.5
4732
0.05
350.00
100.40
460.00
350.05
500.00
060.42
349
8634
56
345
6GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-002
598
30.9
3300
10.05
320.00
100.40
400.00
340.05
520.00
060.45
337
8234
54
346
6GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-003
702
35.9
6599
0.05
320.00
100.39
580.00
350.05
420.00
060.50
337
8233
96
340
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-004
655
33.4
6640
0.05
300.00
100.39
270.00
350.05
410.00
060.63
326
7833
66
340
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-01
613
31.9
5198
0.05
310.00
050.39
960.00
430.05
470.00
060.40
333
4034
16
343
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-02
580
30.1
3735
0.05
330.00
050.39
980.00
430.05
450.00
060.11
342
4034
16
342
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-03
541
27.2
5570
0.05
340.00
050.40
030.00
450.05
450.00
060.49
346
4034
26
342
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-04
607
30.6
2433
30.05
330.00
050.40
050.00
450.05
460.00
060.31
343
4034
26
343
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-05
536
26.9
6715
0.05
320.00
050.40
610.00
490.05
550.00
070.32
339
4234
68
348
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-06
533
26.5
4854
0.05
350.00
050.40
450.00
490.05
510.00
070.35
349
4034
58
345
8GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-001
a68
135
.486
530.05
340.00
050.40
400.00
240.05
500.00
030.52
344
4434
54
345
4GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-004
628
32.3
1239
70.05
310.00
050.39
730.00
250.05
430.00
030.50
334
4434
04
341
4GJ-1,
9150
0Plešovice
PL-006
572
29.1
4789
0.05
310.00
050.39
320.00
270.05
380.00
030.54
335
4233
74
338
4GJ-1,
9150
0
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 67
References
Andersen T, Griffin WL, Pearson NJ (2002) Crustal evolution in theSW part of the Baltic Shield: the Hf isotope evidence. J Petrol43:1725–1747
Andersen T, Griffin WL, Jackson SE, Knudsen T-L, Pearson NJ(2004) Mid-Proterozoic magmatic arc evolution at the southwestmargin of the Baltic Shield. Lithos 73:289–318
Andersen T, Graham S, Sylvester AG (2007) Timing and tectonicsignificane of Sveconorwegian A-type granitic magmatism inTelemark, southern Norway: New results from laser-ablation ICPMSU–Pb dating of zircon. Norges Geol Under, Bulletin 447:17–31
Barrie CT, Amelin Y, Pascual E (2002) U–Pb geochronology of VMSmineralization in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Min Dep 37:684–703
Barriga FJAS (1983) Hydrothermal metamorphism and ore genesis atAljustrel, Portugal. PhD thesis, Univ Western Ontario, 368 p
Belousova EA, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (2006) Zircon crystalmorphology, trace element signatures and Hf isotope compositionas a tool for petrogenetic modeling: examples from EasternAustralian granitoids. J Petrol 47:329–353
Black LP, Kamo SL, Allen CM, Davis DW, Aleinikoff JN, Valley JW,Mundil R, Campbell IH, Korscha RJ, Williams IS, Foudoulis C(2004) Improved 206Pb/238U microprobe geochronology by themonitoring of a trace-element-related matrix effect; SHRIMP,ID–TIMS, ELA–ICP–MS and oxygen isotope documentation fora series of zircon standards. Chem Geol 205:115–140
Bouvier A, Vervoort JD, Patchett PJ (2007) The Lu-Hf CHUR value.Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts 2007. Geoch Cosmoch Acta71(15S):A116
Carvalho D (1976) Considerações sobre o vulcanismo da região deCercal-Odemira. Suas relações com a faixa piritosa. Com ServGeol Portugal 60:215–238
Carvalho D, Barriga F, Munhá J (1999) Bimodal Siliciclastic systems:the case of the Iberian Pyrite Belt. In: Barrie CT, Hannington MD(eds) Volcanic associated massive sulfide deposits: Processes andexamples in modern and ancient settings. Rev Econ Geol 8:375–408
Chu NC, Taylor RN, Chavagnac V, Nesbitt RW, Boella M, Milton J(2002) Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi-collector inductivelycoupled plasma mass spectrometry: an evaluation of isobaricinterference corrections. J Anal Atomic Spec 17:1567–1574
Corfu F, Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO, Kinny O (2003) Atlas of zircontextures. In: Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO (eds) Zircon. Rev MinGeochem 53:469–499
Dunning GR, Diez Montes A, Matas J, Martin Parra LM, Almarza J,Donaire M (2002) Geocronología U/Pb del volcanismo ácido ygranitoides de la Faja Pirítica Ibérica (Zona Surportuguesa).Geogaceta 32:127–130
Finch AA, Garcia-Guinea J, Hole DE, Townsend PD, Hanchar JM(2004) Ionoluminescence of zircon: rare earth emissions andradiation damage. J Physics D: Applied Physics 37:2795–2803
Gerdes A, Zeh A (2006) Combined U–Pb and Hf isotope La-(MC-)ICP-MS analyses of detrital zircons: Comparison with SHRIMP and newconstraints for the provenance and age of an Armorican metasedi-ment in Central Germany. Earth Planet Sci Letters 249:47–61
Griffin WL, Pearson PJ, Belousova E, Jackson SE, O'Reilly SY, vanAchterberg E, Shee SR (2000) The Hf isotope composition ofcratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrystsin kimberlites. Geoch Cosmoch Acta 64:133–147
Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, Belousova EA, Saeed A (2006) Hf-isotopeheterogeneity in zircon 91500. Chem Geol 233:358–363
Iizuka UT, Hirata T (2005) Improvement of precision and accuracy inin situ Hf isotope microanalysis of zircon using the laserablation-MC-ICPMS technique. Chem Geol 220:121–137
Jackson SE, Pearson NJ, Griffin WL, Belousova EA (2004) The appli-cation of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrom-etry to in-situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. Chem Geol 211:47–69
Jorge, RCGS, Pinto AMM, Tassinari CCG, Relvas JMRS, Munhá J(2007) VHMS metal sources in the Iberian Pyrite Belt: newinsights from Pb isotope data, Proceedings of the 9th BiennialSGA Meeting, 1097–1100
Julivert M, Fontbote JM, Ribeiro A, Conde L (1972) Mapa tectónicode la Península Ibérica y Baleares, 1/1.000.000. Instituto Geo-lógico Minero de España, Madrid
Leistel JM, Marcoux E, Thieblemont D, Quesada C, Sanchez A,Almodovar GR, Pascual E, Saez R (1998) The volcanic-hostedmassive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt: Review andpreface to the special issue. Min Dep 33:2–30
Leitão J (1998) Geologia dos depósitos de sulfuretos maciços deAljustrel. In: Oliveira JT, Dias RP (eds) Livro Guia da Excursões.V Congresso Nacional de Geologia, Instituto Geológico eMineiro, Madrid, pp 101–110
Table 5 Summary of Yb-Lu-Hf systematics of reference zircons
Reference sample Present day Initial
N 176Yb/177Hf 176Lu/177Hf 176Hf/177Hf 178Hf/177Hf t (Ma) (176Hf/177Hf)t ɛHf
JMC475a 18 0.282158 1.467292 SD 0.000028 0.00006
91500 129 0.0120 0.0003 0.282301 1.46728 1065 0.282295 6.02 SD 0.0043 0.00005 0.000080 0.00018 0.000079 2.8
Mud tank 509 0.0015 0.00003 0.282509 1.46727 732 0.282509 6.02 SD 0.0010 0.00002 0.000050 0.00010 0.000050 1.8
Temora 2 273 0.0457b 0.0011 0.282701 1.46726 417 0.282692 5.42 SD 0.0344 0.0007 0.000062 0.00013 0.000061 2.2
GJ-1 115 0.0096 0.00028 0.282018 1.46727 608 0.282015 -14.22 SD 0.0024 0.00002 0.000062 0.00012 0.000062 2.2
Literature values (solution data): 91500: 0.282306±8, Mud Tank: 0.282507±6, Temora-2: 0.285686±8 (Woodhead and Hergt 2005); GJ-1:0.281998±7 (Gerdes and Zeh 2006)a Pure solution analyzed using Nu Instruments desolvating nebulizer.b Observed range of 176 Yb/177 Hf in Temora-2: 0.0136 to 0.0922.
68 D.R.N. Rosa et al.
Le Maitre RW, Bateman P, Dudek A, Keller J, Lameyre J, Le Bas MJ,Sabine PA, Schmid R, Sørensen H, Streckeisen A, Woolley AR,Zanettin B (1989) A classification of igneous rocks and glossaryof terms. Blackwell, Oxford, p 193
Lentz DR (1999) Petrology, geochemistry, and oxygen isotope inter-pretation of felsic volcanic and related rocks hosting the Brunswick6 and 12 massive sulfide deposits (Brunswick Belt), BathurstMining camp, New Brunswick, Canada. Econ Geol 94:57–86
Ludwig KR (2003) Isoplot 3.0—a geochronological toolkit forMicrosoft excel. Berkeley Geochron Center, Berkeley, p 70special publication no. 4
Mitjavila J, Martí J, Soriano C (1997) Magmatic evolution andtectonic setting of the Iberian Pyrite Belt volcanism. J Petrol38:727–755
Munhá J (1983) Hercynian magmatism in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. In:Sousa MJL, Oliveira JT (eds) The Carboniferous of Portugal.Mem Serv Geol Portugal 29:39–81
Munhá J (1990) Metamorphic evolution of the South portuguese/Pulodo Lobo Zone. In: Dallmeyer RD, Martinez Garcia E (eds) Pre-mesozoic geology of Iberia. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–368
Nesbitt RW, Pascual E, Fenning CM, Toscano M, Saez R, AlmodovarRG (1999) U–Pb dating of stockwork zircons from the easternIberian Pyrite Belt. J Geol Soc London 156:7–10
Oliveira JT (1990) South Portuguese Zone. In: Dallmeyer RD,Martinez Garcia E (eds) Pre-mesozoic geology of Iberia.Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 333–346
Oliveira JT, Pereira Z, Carvalho P, Pacheco N, Korn D (2004)Stratigraphy of the tectonically imbricated lithological successionof the Neves Corvo mine area, Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal. MinDep 39:422–436
Oliveira JT, Pereira Z, Rosa CJ, Rosa D, Matos JX (2005) Recentadvances in the study of the stratigraphy and the magmatism ofthe Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal. In: Carosi R, Dias R, IacopiniD, Rosenbaum G (eds) The southern Variscan belt. J VirtualExplorer, Electronic Edition 19/9:1441–8142
Oliveira JT, Relvas JMRS, Pereira Z, Matos JX, Rosa CJ, Rosa D,Munhá JM, Jorge RCGS, Pinto AMM (2006) O Complexovulcano-sedimentar da Faixa Piritosa: Estratigrafia, vulcanismo,mineralizações associadas e evolução tectono-estratigráfica nocontexto da Zona Sul-Portuguesa. In: Dias R, Araújo A, TerrinhaP, Kullberg JC (eds) Geologia de Portugal no contexto da Ibéria,Univ Évora, pp 207–243
Pearce JA, Harris NBW, Tindle AG (1984) Trace element discrimi-nation diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. JPetrol 25:956–983
Pereira Z, Matos JX, Fernandes P, Oliveira JT (2007) Devonian andCarboniferous palynostratigraphy of the South Portuguese Zone,Portugal—An overview. Com Int Microflore Paléozoique.INETI, Lisbon, pp 111–114
Piercey SJ, Pardais S, Murphy DC, Mortensen JK (2001) Geochem-istry and paleotectonic setting of felsic volcanic rocks in theFinlayson Lake volcanic-hosted massive sulfide district, Yukon,Canada. Econ Geol 96:1877–1906
Pupin JP (1980) Zircon and granite petrology. Cont Min Petrol73:207–220
Quesada C (1991) Geological constraints on the Paleozoic tectonicevolution of tectonostratigraphic terranes in the Iberian massif.Tectonophysics 185:225–245
Røhr TS, Andersen T, Dypvik H (2008) Provenance of LowerCretaceous sediments in the Wandel Sea Basin, North Greenland.J Geol Soc 165:755–767
Rosa C (2007) Facies architecture of the Volcano SedimentaryComplex of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal and Spain: PhDThesis, Univ Tasmania, 376 p
Rosa D, Inverno C, Oliveira V, Rosa C (2004) Geochemistry ofvolcanic rocks, Albernoa area, Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal. IntGeol Rev 46:366–383
Rosa D, Inverno C, Oliveira V, Rosa C (2006) Geochemistry andgeothermometry of volcanic rocks from Serra Branca, IberianPyrite Belt, Portugal. Gondwana Res 10:328–339
Scherer EE, Münker C, Mezger K (2001) Calibration of the lutetium-hafnium clock. Science 293:683–687
Scherer EE, Münker C, Mezger K (2007) The Lu-Hf systematics ofmeteorites: Consistent or not. Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts2007. Geoch Cosmoch Acta, 71(15S):A888
Schermerhorn LHG (1971) An outline stratigraphy of the IberianPyrite Belt. Bol Geol Min 82:239–279
Schermerhorn LHG, Zbyzewski G, Ferreira V (1987) Carta Geol.Portugal 1/50000, Fl. 42D Aljustrel, SGP, 55 p
Segal I, Halicz L, Platzner IT (2003) Accurate isotope ratio measure-ments of ytterbium by multiple collection inductively coupledplasma mass spectrometry applying erbium and hafnium in animproved double external normalization procedure. J AnalAtomic Spec 18:1217–1223
Silva JB, Oliveira JT, Ribeiro A (1990) South Portuguese Zone.Structural outline. In: Dallmeyer RD, Martinez Garcia E (eds)Pre-mesozoic geology of Iberia. Springer, Berlin, pp 348–362
Simonetti A, Heaman LM, Hartlaub RP, Creaser RA, MacHattie TG,Böhm C (2005) U–Pb zircon dating by laser ablation-MC-ICP-MS using a new multiple ion counting Faraday collector array. JAnal Atomic Spec 20:677–686
Sláma J, Košler J, Condon DJ, Crowley JL, Gerdes A, Hanchar JM,Horstwood MSA, Morris GA, Nasdala L, Norberg N, Schalteg-ger U, Schoene B, Tubrett MN, Whitehouse MJ (2008) Plešovicezircon—a new natural reference material for U/Pb and Hfisotopic microanalysis. Chem Geol 249:1–35
Söderlund U, Patchett PJ, Vervoort J, Isachsen CE (2004) The 176 Ludecay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U–Pb isotope system-atics of Precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci Letters219:311–324
Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis, 2nd edn.University Science Books, Sausalito, p 327
Thiéblemont D, Pascual E, Stein G (1998) Magmatism in the IberianPyrite Belt: petrological constraints on a metallogenetic model.Min Dep 33:98–110
Tornos F, Casquet C, Relvas JMRS (2005) Transpressional tectonics,lower crust decoupling and intrusion of deep mafic sills: amodel for the unusual metallogenesis of SW Iberia. Ore GeolRev 27:133–163
Van Achterbergh E, Ryan CG, Jackson SE, Griffin L (2000) Datareduction software for LA-ICPMS: Appendix. In: Sylvester PJ(ed) Laser ablation-ICP-mass spectrometry in the earth sciences:principles and applications. Min Ass Can Short Course Series29:239–243
Vervoort JD, Blichert-Toft J (1999) Evolution of the depleted mantle:Hf isotope evidence from juvenile rocks through time. GeochCosmoch Acta 63:533–556
Wiedenbeck M, Alle P, Corfu F, Griffin WL, Meier M, Oberli F, VonQuadt A, Roddick JC, Spiegel W (1995) Three natural zirconstandards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses.Geostand Newsl 19:1–23
Woodhead JD, Hergt JM (2005) A preliminary appraisal of sevennatural zircon reference materials for in situ Hf isotopedetermination. Geostandards Geoanalytical Res 29:183–195
Woodhead J, Hergt J, Shelley M, Eggins S, Kemp R (2004) ZirconHf-isotope analysis with an eximer laser, depth profiling, ablationof complex geometries and concomitant age estimation. ChemGeol 209:121–135
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope ratios of magmatic zircons 69