Fundraising: A Summary for SSC Specialist Groups Updated ...
The strategic marketing of small sports clubs: from fundraising to social entrepreneurship
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of The strategic marketing of small sports clubs: from fundraising to social entrepreneurship
For Peer Review O
nly
THE STRATEGIC MARKETING OF SMALL SPORTS CLUBS:
FROM FUNDRAISING TO SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Journal: Journal of Strategic Marketing
Manuscript ID: Draft
Manuscript Type: Original Article
Keywords: Strategic Marketing, Small Sports Clubs, Fundraising, Social Entrepreneurship
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
For Peer Review O
nly
1
THE STRATEGIC MARKETING OF SMALL SPORTS CLUBS: FROM
FUNDRAISING TO SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates how Small Sports Clubs (SSCs), the foundations for sporting
excellence and significant contributors to the social capital of society in the face of continued
financial difficulties, can maximise their fundraising activities. A conceptual framework for
investigating the traditional fundraising planning process in the unique context of SSCs is
developed and a qualitative methodology is utilised via 19 in-depth interviews in Northern
Ireland and Germany to test this model. The findings of this study questions the applicability
of generic fundraising planning processes for SSCs and emphasises the previously under-
realised central role that individual personal competencies play and argues for the application
and practice of Social Entrepreneurship in order to ensure the long term survival of SSCs.
This study makes a contribution to the developing literature on sports marketing and to the
important issue of strategic fundraising in the context of SSCs. It highlights the informal, ad-
hoc nature of fundraising in many SSCs and provides some direction for how they could
become more professional in how they fund their activities and plan for the future
development of the clubs.
KEYWORDS: SMEs, Strategic Fundraising Planning, Sports Marketing, Social
Entrepreneurship, Qualitative Research.
Page 1 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
2
INTRODUCTION
Small Sports Clubs (SSCs) are the basis for excellence in sport and play a crucial role in the
sports development of every country (Coleman 2002, Papadimitriou 2002, Garrett 2004,
Harris et al 2009). They are predominantly voluntary bodies that offer a diverse range of
sporting and social objectives. They contribute to the social capital of a society and the
regeneration, better health, safer, more cohesive and inclusive communities, and lifelong
learning (Reid Howie Associates 2006, Harris et al 2009, Zakus et al 2009). As SSCs
promote values and enrich their communities, they play a crucial role in society.
Although the major sports industry was once considered to be recession-proof, professional
sports organisations have felt the consequences of the economic downturn (Chadwick 2009,
Fullerton and Johnson 2009, Humphreys 2010) as have non-professional sports associations
(Taks 2010). Lack of funding is often attributed to insufficient marketing activities. Sports
organisations need to secure their survival, not only on a short-term but also on a long-term
basis. They need to proactively generate and develop relevant resources such as time, money
and knowledge (often via volunteers), which is collectively understood as fundraising, in
order to tackle their main problems (Freyer 2003, Fabisch 2006, Lindahl 2010).
The aim of this paper is to investigate how SSCs can maximise their fundraising activities.
The relevant literature regarding sport marketing, Small Sports Clubs and SMEs are
discussed initially, followed by consideration of existing fundraising models to help create a
conceptual framework for investigating fundraising in the unique context of SSCs.
Page 2 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
3
SPORT MARKETING AND THE SMALL SPORTS CLUB (SSC)
Although there is no generally accepted definition of sport marketing, academics agree that
two distinctive streams “marketing of sport” and “marketing through sport” exist (Shilbury et
al 2003, Gallagher et al 2009, Masteralexis et al 2009). This research considers marketing
activities from the sports organisation point of view, and focus on the “marketing of sport”.
Sport marketing literature has predominantly focused upon sponsorship, endorsements,
advertisements, spectator fandom and motivations, and spectator segmentation (Gallagher et
al 2009). The importance of database marketing and the role of customer relationship
management are also evident in the literature (Mullin et al 2007, Ferrand and McCarthy
2009).
A sports organisation can be understood as a “social entity involved in the sport industry; it is
goal directed, with a consciously structured activity system and a relatively identifiable
boundary” (Slack and Parent 2006:5). Stewart (2007) states that sports organisations vary in
terms of their legal structures with unincorporated associations at one end and public
companies at the other end of a profit motive and business structure model. Beech and
Chadwick (2007) distinguish between three major types of sports organisations: the small-to-
medium not-for-profit enterprise, the larger revenue-generating or resource-plentiful not-for-
profit sporting organisation and the private or public owned for-profit sporting organisation.
This paper is set in the context of small-to-medium not-for-profit sports club that have a
turnover of no more than £1 million per annum, a marketing department of one or two people
at most and must therefore be seen as small businesses (Beech and Chadwick 2007).
Page 3 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
4
SMEs
In the UK, the most widely accepted definition of SMEs is that based on the findings of the
Bolton Committee Report (1971) which defines a small firm as an independent business,
managed by its owner or part-owners and having a small market share. Recent EU definitions
specify that a small company is one with no more than 50 employees, turnover of ≤€10m and
/ or a balance sheet total of ≤€10m; a medium company is one with no more than 250
employees, turnover of ≤€50m and / or a balance sheet total of ≤€43m; it further specifies a
micro company as one with no more than 10 employees, turnover of ≤€2m and / or a balance
sheet of ≤€2m.
Given these criteria, it is evident that SMEs possess unique characteristics and will therefore
be constrained in their marketing, as they are hampered by a lack of resources in terms of
finance, time and marketing knowledge. Overall, they tend to lack specialist knowledge as
they are usually managed by generalists rather than specialists and often have limited ability
to impact on the marketplace. The nature of the marketing they do is not found in traditional
textbook frameworks or conventional practices found in large organisations, instead they tend
to be haphazard, informal, loose, unstructured, spontaneous and reactive (Carson et al 1995,
Gilmore et al 2001).
In the context of this study a small sports club is considered to be a small enterprise and is
defined as a:
“…member of a national league; has an average attendance of ≤ 500; operates as a not-for-
profit organisation and is operated and administered predominately by volunteers”
(Gallagher et al 2009:3).
Page 4 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
5
FUNDRAISING
Research in the field of fundraising and not-for-profit organisations (Sargeant 1999), has
increased exponentially in recent years (Levy 2004, Carpenter et al 2008) with numerous
studies and research focusing on different sectors including higher education institutions
(Pearson 1999, Sargeant 2009), hospitals (Lindahl and Conley 2002), kindergartens (Hirsch
2008), youth centres (Pisarczyk 2000), politics (Rieken 2002) libraries (Aalto 1997, Jank
1999, Carpenter et al 2008) and charities (Gilmore 2003). Whilst, a great deal of this has
been conducted in the USA (Bothwell 2002, Lindahl and Conley 2002, Jones et al 2003), due
in no small part to the pioneering work of Henry A. Rosso and the Fund Raising School at
the Centre on Philanthropy at Indiana University (Tempel et al 2011), there has also been
considerable research on fundraising carried out in the UK (Staples 2004, Bennett 2007,
Aldrich 2009, Sargeant and Jay 2010). However, fundraising in the context of SSCs has not,
as yet, been studied in any depth.
Whilst it has been described as “the gentle art of teaching people the joy of giving’ (Rosso
1991), there is no single agreed definition of fundraising available in the literature.
Definitions range from “management of communication between a charitable organization
and its donor publics” (Kelly 1998:107), to an all-embracing marketing concept that
concentrates on generating all required resources (Urselmann 2002). Lindahl (2010) goes
further by stating that it is “the creation and ongoing development of relationships between a
not-for-profit organization and its various donors for the purpose of increasing gift revenue to
the organization” (p.4). What is widely recognised is that asking for contributions is just one
component of a comprehensive process concerned with the recruitment and development of
all relevant resources, including financial and human.
Page 5 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
6
Fundraising is intrinsically linked with philanthropy. Philanthropy is posited on the belief that
individuals possess an innate or compelling want or need to give to worthy causes and is
viewed as voluntary action, association and giving for the public good (Rosso 1991, Tempel
et al 2011). It is the fundamental cornerstone and the ‘glue’ that holds together entire
fundraising efforts with regards to those who give of their time to administer and develop
fundraising programmes and activities, as well as those who make donations.
The reasons for individual giving are both complex and inter-related and researchers suggest
that they are a combination of psychological motives and sociological influences. Donor’s
motives go beyond pure altruism; it can be a mixture of altruism, selfish motivations and
egoism. Reasons for giving such as obtaining a ‘warm feeling’, prestige among peers,
increased self-esteem and recognition plaques are widespread.
STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL PLANNING FOR FUNDRAISING
The fundraising literature advocates the application of a systematic and rigorous plan to help
achieve objectives (Urselmann 2002, Seiler 2001, Fabisch 2006, Sargeant and Jay 2010).
While the frameworks vary slightly in terms of the diagrams and models that are suggested,
they are largely reflective of the generic planning frameworks ubiquitous within strategic
marketing..
The Situational Analysis: Internal and External Environment
A situational analysis is useful for gathering essential information on the environment within
which the fundraising is to be conducted (Sargeant 2009, Sargeant and Jay 2010).
Page 6 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
7
The internal environment and the acceptance of fundraising activities within the organisation
and the support of the board are clearly important. The key people involved in fundraising
should possess core competencies such as self-competence, social competence, expertise,
methodological competence and occupational competence (Haibach 2002, Ehlers 2006).
Administrative requirements such as the use of databases and easy access to all required
information are important, as are good internal and external communication. Fundraising
organisations also need to fully understand the changing needs of its external environment in
order to be successful (Tempel et al 2011). External influences and individual characteristics
will shape donor decisions to make a contribution (Lindahl and Conley 2002, Smith and
Dunn 1995).
The first step in developing a fundraising plan is for the organisation to specify its core values
in the form of a mission statement (Courtney 1995, Bronzan 1977, Rosso 1991, Kelly 1998,
Seiler 2001). The mission statement provides a philosophical anchor linked with information
gathered from the audit that can be used to develop clear, realisable goals and objectives to
convince trustees, volunteers, staff and contributors that they have a clear plan of what needs
to be done, how and within a reasonable timescale (Rosso 1991, Seiler 2001, Lysakowski
2007, Sargeant 2009, Sargeant and Jay 2010). It is important to consider what is unique
about the organisation’s cause so that it can distinguish its position from that of others
(Courtney 1995, Clarke and Norton 1997, Sargeant and Jay 2010).
Identify Potential Sources of Fundraising
Sources of fundraising include individual donors, companies, trusts and foundations, and
public support (Botting and Norton 2001, Urselmann 2002, Fabisch 2006, Sargeant and Jay
2010). However, some authors claim that public funding is not part of the fundraising
Page 7 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
8
process, as fundraising activities only aim to achieve additional income but do not represent a
source of regular support (Stier 1994, Haibach 2002). It has been found that government
grants crowd out fundraising because private charities will reduce their fundraising activities
following public support (Andreoni and Payne 2003). It may also impact on resources, for
example Enjolras (2002) claims that an increase in commercial income will cause a decrease
in voluntary work.
Tactical Issues
At the tactical level the finer details of how to achieve objectives are important (Lindahl
2010). This is based upon the development of a targeted tactical mix that is dependent on the
requirements of the specific segment or source funding (Bronzan 1977, Wagner 2004,
Sargeant 2009).
Selecting Fundraising methods
Having decided on which is the most apt segment to target for fundraising efforts a number of
methods can be used to specifically target each. Fundraising methods targeted at individuals
include personal contact, direct mail, telemarketing, advertising (press, TV and radio), events
(sponsored walks or fun runs), payroll giving, inserts and increasingly e-fundraising is being
used to solicit contributions through the Internet. Corporate targeted fundraising methods
include cash, stocks and shares donations, publicity of cause, gifts-in-kind (products and
services), provision of staff time, sponsorship, staff or customer-run events or collecting
money from fines and legacy fundraising. Fundraising methods for trusts and foundations are
targeted specifically at grants from institutional or private funding bodies, the profits of large
corporations, companies or private families who bequest money as part of a will or establish
memorials for dead relatives. A common misconception is that these bequests are sourced
Page 8 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
9
only from the very wealthy or the elderly, whereas a proactive approach to all sections of the
population from a list of possible prospects with personal contact could be used to develop
future sources of funds (Bronzan 1977, Clarke 1993, Stier 1994, Courtney 1995, Clarke and
Norton 1997, Sargeant 1999; 2009 , Sargeant and Ewing 2001, Fabisch 2006, Sargeant and
Jay 2010).
Involving Volunteers
While the crucial role in the fundraising process of a volunteer’s time, knowledge and effort
is well noted in the literature (Clarke 1993, Seiler 2001, Sargeant and Jay 2010), only Rosso’s
(1991) model explicitly highlights their involvement as a distinct part of the fundraising
cycle.
There are different levels of volunteerism (Breuer and Wicker 2010). Coleman (2002: 220)
differentiates between volunteers who are systematic and ‘have a clearly defined role and
who make a regular commitment to the successful running of the … team’ and volunteers
who are only occasionally engaged in the club’s off-field performance. There are also
different types of recruitment: warm body recruitment, focusing on developing a large
volunteer force without much regard for specific skills; targeted recruitment, focusing on a
smaller number of individuals who have specific skills needed for the organisation’s
operation and concentric circles recruitment, focusing on keeping a steady flow of volunteers
involved in the organisation (McCurley 1994).
Often sports clubs lack direction and planning in relation to the management of volunteers
(Reid Howie Associates 2006) and role ambiguity is a potential problem (Sakires et al 2009).
Reliance on volunteers can often leave SSCs very vulnerable, and they can face a volunteer
Page 9 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
10
shortage with work increasingly being left to only a few people (Zakus et al 2009). The loss
of key volunteers can leave gaps that are difficult to fill and that are possibly fatal to their
chances of survival (Coleman 2002; Harris et al 2009).
Soliciting the resource and promoting relationship Fundraising
Fundraising is the ‘principle of asking, asking again and asking for more’ (Klein 1997),
which highlights that fundraising is concerned with a long-term commitment and the total
‘lifetime value’ of a donor (Sargeant and Jay 2010). Although there is a common
misconception that fundraising is only about asking for contributions (Hönig and Schulz
2006; Lindahl 2010), many scholars point out the importance of developing donor
relationships. Particularly in the context of not-for-profit organisations whose transactions
may not have an adequate service in return, it is vital to cultivate a relationship with donors
(Kelly 1998, Fabisch 2006, Hönig and Schulz 2006, Mazurkiewicz and Thieme 2008, Waters
2008).
In return for funding, donors deserve a basic treatment that includes the provision of
information (Lindahl 2010) and communication that keeps them feeling involved. Sargeant
and Jay’s (2010) model specifically includes the importance of thanks, recognition, regular
communication and feedback, stewardship reports and invitations to participate when
developing donor relations.
A CONCEPTUAL FUNDRAISING MODEL
The literature suggests many fundraising models that all reflect the application of a well-
conceived, systematic and process-based planning framework approach as previously
outlined. All of these models are ‘cyclical’ in nature. Where they do appear as a series of
Page 10 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
11
sequential steps or phases they inevitably include a ‘loopback’ phase (Kelly 1998, Sargeant
2009, Sargeant and Jay 2010, Sargeant et al 2010).
However, it could be argued that many of these models are outdated, were constructed for a
different context, such as health care (Smith 2005), or based on a different fundraising
environment, such as the United States (Lindahl 2010), rather than the UK or Europe.
Furthermore, Wagner (2004) states that the fundraising process will be influenced by the
context in which it occurs and it is important to consider how fundraising is understood
within that particular context. The conceptual fundraising model used for this research (Fig.
1) is based on the relevance of fundraising to SSCs. Sargeant and Jay (2010) assume that the
organisation’s size is irrelevant for applying fundraising planning frameworks. However,
SME literature suggests that owner managers of smaller enterprises do carry out marketing
planning, but they do so in a more informal way. The model includes all the formal stages of
planning and this research will investigate to what extent SSCs address all stages.
Page 11 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
12
Fig. 1: A Conceptual Fundraising Model
(Source: synthesised for this research from Rosso 1991, Courtney 1995, Kelly 1998, Seiler
2001, Fabisch 2006, Lysakowski 2007, Sargeant 2009, Sargeant and Jay 2010)
Situational analysis
of:
Internal environment
External environment
Identify
Potential
Sources
Select
Fundraising
Methods
Tactical
Planning
Strategic
Planning
Soliciting
the
Resource
Promoting
Relationship
Fundraising
Involving
Volunteers
Evaluate,
Control and
Review
Page 12 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
13
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study adopted a qualitative methodology and focused on investigating how SSCs carry
out fundraising activities. Individual in-depth interviews were chosen for data collection as
they were considered to be more suitable for gaining deep insight to sensitive information
that people might not feel confident to reveal in a group (Denscombe 2007). This was
particularly relevant for this study as there is little cooperation between the sports clubs,
indeed there is often a high level of intense rivalry (Mason 1999).
Nineteen semi-structured interviews, using an interview guide with key topics and questions,
were conducted. The interview guide was based on the conceptual framework and included
questions relating to carrying out a situational analysis looking at the internal and external
environment of the club, approaches used to generate resources, selecting fundraising
methods, the nature and characteristics of volunteers in the club and how they facilitate the
fundraising process, soliciting the resource and promoting relationship fundraising.
This research was carried out in Germany and Ireland. The researchers’ network facilitated
contact with appropriate people; and the contact details of the clubs not known to researchers
were obtained from the German Rugby Union website and the Irish Football Association.
Key informants for the study belonged to sports clubs that fitted the criteria for the study in
terms of being SSCs. Although most of the respondents for the study were identified using
personal contacts all clubs received a letter requesting their participation in the study, for
clarification. To ensure that the letter reached the person in charge, it was followed up with a
phone call. In the cases where the contacted person was not the appropriate one, the letter was
forwarded to the correct club member. Out of 25 clubs contacted, 19 agreed to participate
(Clubs A-T). This was considered sufficient to gather meaningful data.
Page 13 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
14
Collection of Data
To avoid being overloaded with information, it was important to spread the interviews over a
number of weeks (Easterby-Smith et al 2002). The choice of the venue was left to the
participants and was either the clubhouse, their office or in some cases their homes. Before
starting the interview, it was important to mention the confidentiality of the data and to
confirm agreement to record the interview (Carson et al 2001). Interviews were then carried
out in Germany and Ireland. In Germany interviews were carried out in German to ensure
that the participants could effectively communicate without any language barriers.
Transcripts were translated into English, and back checked with the original interviewer for
meaning and interpretation. Each interview lasted between 25 and 50 minutes and in some
cases a follow-up interview was carried out where some detailed information was missing, in
order to precisely compare and analyse the findings and generate an accurate interpretation.
In addition to electronically recording the interview, notes were taken to ensure getting all the
information and to refer back to a particular statement if necessary.
Research Analysis
All transcripts were coded in relation to the key themes identified in the literature. Codes
were used to “label, separate, compile and organise data” (Charmaz 1983:186) and to capture
the meaning of units of texts. The names of the codes derived from the existing literature
(Saunders et al 2009). For example, the internal and external environment, setting goals,
potential fundraising sources, selecting fundraising methods, use of volunteers, soliciting
resources and relationship fundraising. They were applied to every interview in order to
investigate the applicability of generic fundraising models to each club and to understand
how the club’s unique characteristics affected their approach to fundraising.
Page 14 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
15
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
The findings are discussed in relation to the key stages in the fundraising cycle identified in
the literature and considered earlier.
Strategic Planning
There was very little recognition of formal strategic planning found in this study, with only a
small number of clubs (A, B, C, J, K) saying that they had written down an overall plan
relating to what they wanted to do, in relation to the strengths and objectives for the club. For
example, Club K said that they do try to ‘sit down at the beginning of the year and plan a
programme of events so that we have a steady stream of money coming in and it also means
that we are not asking the same people for money all the time’. However there was very little
appreciation of the value of looking strategically at fundraising planning. Some clubs, such
as B and E said that a plan for their clubs would be inappropriate and unnecessary, as their
approach was haphazard and based on action and intuition. The prevailing opinion was
illustrated by club H’s manager who stated that using a plan is like “cracking a nut with a
sledgehammer”.
Situational Analysis: Internal and External Environment
Overall 16 of these SSCs said that they intuitively considered the internal situation of their
clubs in relation to fundraising planning. This included giving some thought to their club’s
mission and having some administrative, internal and external communicational
requirements. Club L’s manager said that their club had people with ‘ideas, vision and the
will to carry out plans’. Some managers had years of experience in managing clubs and were
accustomed to making plans (Clubs A, D, M) and that helped them develop the relevant
internal prerequisites for fundraising. In addition, findings illustrated that the vision, mission
Page 15 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
16
and objectives stated are solely in terms of the sport offered and planned performance in term
of how “to develop the youth division” (Club J) for example, but not in terms of business
development and off-field performance.
Only one club (Club C) explicitly stated that they had tried to analyse the external
environment, identify opportunities and threats, and conduct competitor analyses. They said
that “it is important to analyse what the club’s worth is” (Club C). The other clubs said that
they do not have the resources to carry out any analyses. They all spoke of their lack of
money, time, knowledge and motivation in conducting this, with some clubs (F, G, P, O)
doubting whether a comprehensive analysis of the external environment would be of any
benefit to them; arguing that the best way to know what is happening externally is to gather
information from players, fans and friends.
Potential Fundraising Sources
The majority of clubs emphasised the importance of personal contacts in order to acquire
resources and sources of funding (A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I, J, L, M). Club I’s manager used his
personal networks and business contacts to help expand membership and gain sponsorship.
Club J recruits sponsors exclusively by using the personal contacts of players, fans and
friends. A small number of clubs (F and H) did not proactively identify any potential useful
sources of funds, as they only provided financial support for youth development.
While these clubs stated that they used a range of sources, including statutory or public
funding and sponsorship from companies, there was an overwhelming reliance on individual
donors to provide funds. Many of these clubs are aware that they rely on a very limited
number of people for fundraising and some are concerned about this. For example club M’s
Page 16 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
17
manager said ‘it’s the same twenty people who sponsor the races, who sponsor the event’ and
Club P’s manager said that ‘fundraising is very important to us but it is not easy when you
are going to the same people over and over again to organise it and the same supporters to
contribute to it – it is holding back our development that we have a small support base’. Club
N’s manager said ‘we don’t like asking the same people over and over again to buy tickets for
fundraising events’.
There appeared to be some recognition of the value of philanthropic donations with many
yearning for a rich sponsor to come along and rescue them. Clubs K and M said they could
identify some sponsors for small amounts of money, but they do not have anyone to sponsor
them for larger amounts. What was clearly lacking from the fundraising activities of all clubs
involved was a lack of targeted effort to sourcing funds from trusts and foundations. Club
K’s manager said ‘what we lack is a number of big businessmen who are supporting us
financially’.
Tactical Planning
Whilst numerous fundraising tactics were employed by the clubs, there was also limited and
varied use of formal tactical fundraising plans. Only 5 of the SSCs said that they had
attempted to use a tactical fundraising plan (C, F, G, J and K), and some commented that they
had considered or dabbled in tactical planning but the use was restricted. Club B said they
were currently preparing a tactical plan to try to convince the club’s board to carry out a one-
off project, but they did not consider tactical planning for anything else. Whilst Clubs C, F,
and G said that they had used some tactical planning, this was only for specific events, such
as a jubilee event or tournament, including a schedule and budget but that they did not use
any formal planning for their other fundraising methods.
Page 17 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
18
Selecting Fundraising Methods
The main income of clubs is generated through membership fees. Individual fundraising
concentrates on community events, sale of goods and services, weekly or monthly lotteries,
prize draws, sponsored walks and bowling nights, all of which are organised informally to
provide a steady stream of money throughout the year for the clubs. Club O’s manager said
that they ‘try to run something at least once a month but don’t plan as such, it’s more of an
ad hoc thing’.
Company or corporate fundraising was found to be solely focused on sponsorship, for
example. Club M identified ‘match day sponsors who sponsor games, balls and programme
advertising’. None of the clubs have used online fundraising, or tried to gather funds from
legacies or fine collections. No club had sought donations in the form of staff time and
knowledge from companies. Furthermore, no consideration, perhaps due to lack of
awareness or confidence in the role of philanthropy, has been given to soliciting funds from
trusts or foundations.
Involving Volunteers
All of the clubs have considered the crucial involvement of volunteers in their activities.
Most clubs (A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I, K, L, M, N) indicated that they do not have problems in
motivating members or friends of the club to help out at events when needed. They listed
activities such as merchandising, social functions like barbeques or breakfasts, and organising
parties that involve the help of volunteers. For example, Clubs N and O specifically
encourage their volunteers to become actively involved in fundraising, and take on specific
roles in seeking funding throughout the year. Club M has volunteers to help with a variety of
Page 18 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
19
activities such as “paying for getting the ground prepared before a match, working at the
turnstile and painting rooms in the clubhouse”.
However, in terms of developing systematic volunteers, some clubs (A, E, G and K) have
experienced problems and volunteer involvement often varies between occasional and
systematic volunteers. This is not only traced back to the “fear of long-term commitment”
(A), but also to the associated duty of having to attend board meetings with the parent clubs
(G, K). Club K said that particularly for young women, it is challenging to become engaged
in a board that is dominated by older male ex-players: “it is hard to be accepted within the
board as a women”. Furthermore, some clubs have had problems in acquiring sufficient
volunteers to handle the amount of work necessary, even though they had a large committee.
Club E admits that they do not do anything to motivate their members to become involved,
rather it is taken for granted that they will automatically be engaged in volunteer work.
Soliciting the Resource and Promoting Relationship Fundraising
In terms of seeking resources, there is a variety of effort ranging from some clubs who try
very hard (B, K, M, N, P) to those who do not try at all (F and H). For example, Club F
argued that they are “always contacted by individuals and companies that are interested” in
helping and indicate that as they do not lack any money, they do not need to proactively seek
resources. Soliciting resources is often simply seen as asking people they know for
contributions (A, C, D, E, G, I, J) and Club E even goes so far as saying that it is “begging for
money”. Most of the clubs recognise that the best way to maintain funds is through building
their networks with individuals and businesses in the local community and to develop a
Page 19 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
20
relationship with them over time. Club I’s manager said that ‘networking is the only way
fundraising is carried out… it is a very informal and unplanned approach’.
Most clubs have tried to develop relationships with people or organisations that might fund
their activities. They have tried to maintain some level of relationship by at least showing
recognition and gratitude to helpers, maintaining regular communication, sending invitations
to participate as they recognise the importance of valuing donors and they want to “give
something back”. For example, Club A shows it’s gratitude to funders by sending pictures of
events, thank-you letters and tickets. Club C has a logo linked to its corporate identity, sends
newsletters to its members, and gives T-shirts, free drinks and food at matches to help
develop longer term support from the community. Club I has a logo and corporate identity
and communicates messages regularly using its website. Only one Club (E) argued that it
does not have the time to carry out such activities.
None of the clubs carried out any evaluation, control or review of their fundraising activities
in any formal or even semi-formal way.
Summary of Findings and Managerial Implications
In terms of an application of the conceptual fundraising model developed for this research
(Fig. 1), not all of the stages are fully applied by SSCs. It was evident that SSCs in Germany
and N. Ireland have very similar experiences and approaches to fundraising and managing
their clubs’ activities. The findings showed that internal analysis, volunteer involvement and
relationship fundraising were applied by most of the clubs to some extent. However, the
sources and fundraising are very narrowly focused upon individual donations and methods,
with only limited use of other sources such as company sponsorship.
Page 20 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
21
Comprehensive internal and external analyses, and the use of either strategic or tactical
planning for all fundraising activities, are not fully considered by SSCs. Although the
literature emphasises a systematic and planned approach to fundraising (Urselmann 2002,
Seiler 2001, Smith 2005, Fabisch 2006, Lindahl 2010, Sargeant and Jay 2010), it may be
either inappropriate or unnecessary for SSCs.
This phenomenon is well recognised in other marketing contexts and some authors argue that
the theory of marketing cannot simply be applied to all circumstances; rather it must be
adapted to the specific context (Sheth et al 1988, Carson et al 2001, Hunt 2002). This is
particularly so in the context of small entities such as SSCs and may vary over time as the
external environment changes. SSCs operate within an environment where donor behaviour
can change over time, can be impacted upon by economic growth and recession and from
country to country (Anheier and Toepler 1997, Haiback 2002, Heinzel 2004).
From the literature discussed earlier it would appear that many fundraising models appear to
be similar to generic marketing planning frameworks, but none of them explicitly
acknowledges the high level of influence of the individual who is central to organising and
carrying out the activities. The findings of this study highlight that the activities of SSCs
range from being very proactive to relatively inactive and that individual fundraiser
competencies, usually those of the SSC manager, play a crucial role.
With regard to fundraiser’s competencies, the findings illustrated that nearly all of the
participants were highly involved and possessed comprehensive, social competencies. They
were demonstrating such soft skills as diplomacy, talent for organisation or comprehensive
communication skills. Club D’s manager said that rather than saying he has competence it is
Page 21 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
22
more important to “invest a lot of time and to be involved with commitment and dedication”.
However some of the members (B,G, I) lacked expertise and argued that they do not have the
time and motivation to gather appropriate knowledge about fundraising, as it is accompanied
by “a lot of personal effort” (Member G).
SSC managers are in effect small business managers. They behave like SME
owner/managers, and aspects of SME marketing practice could be used by them to help
develop the clubs. Given that the key characteristics of SME marketing is that they have
limited resources in terms of finance, time and marketing knowledge in relation to doing
marketing (Gilmore et al 2001), they tend to do business in a more informal way which is
heavily influence by the owner/manager. For example, SME marketing in practice is an
adaptation of traditional marketing frameworks to suit the specific organisation, it involves
using networks to develop business, tries to be innovative and over time managers develop
the relevant competencies for doing marketing. In the context of SSCs, developing marketing
competence will include not only involving volunteers, but encouraging them to be more
entrepreneurial and helping them to develop networks and competences for developing the
SSC.
Like small businesses, SSCs need managers with some marketing management competencies
that they can build upon and develop. Competence can be developed; it is manifested in
performance in the context of the tasks and roles of the manager. Many managers perceive
themselves to have limited marketing ability, primarily because their prior interests and
background are not in marketing. Many bring ‘technical’ competence regarding the sport
itself but know that they need to develop their competence in running the club as a small
business. Most relevant are knowledge, experience, communication and judgement in SSC
Page 22 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
23
development and fundraising, and the ability to learn from experience. For example,
competence in taking a more focused approach to the use of resources and planning in
relation to fundraising for both short term and long term objectives.
Another way to develop competence is to seek outside experts to help with business
development and in this way SSCs can diminish the risks of expansion and generate ideas
and possibly resources from new people. Better off people often turn their attention to
philanthropy in later life, but less well documented are the examples of successful business
people who apply what they know works in a business context to the voluntary and social
sector in order to improve conditions at a community level or in a specific context. Social
entrepreneurship and its application and practice in the context of the development of Small
Sports Clubs and their survival within regional and often less than affluent communities can
be very beneficial for all concerned.
The role of a social entrepreneur in providing business knowledge and experience, along with
accessibility to contacts and networks with key people in the business community could be
crucial to the survival of such clubs. The building and maintaining of a reputable image is
vital to the long-term success of any enterprise. However this will require effective
communication, often involving personal, one-to-one communication with key people, and
the ability to provide specific information for the local, immediate market. It will also include
highlighting the benefits of the SSC, the service product it offers and its’ value to users and
the community. Social entrepreneurs with knowledge and experience of business activities
can help SSC’s with their expertise and work towards building relationships with key people
and increasing the professionalism of the SSC. The central role and value of social
Page 23 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
24
entrepreneurship to a SSC’s fundraising efforts is illustrated in Figure 2. To summarise, a
useful social entrepreneur for SSCs is someone who can:
- use personal selling and lobbying to build relationships with key people and focus on
increasing the professionalism of the SSC
- develop a communication and promotion strategy that will create awareness and provide
information about the activities and benefits of the SSC.
- develop communication that will tell users and stakeholders the benefits of the ‘product and
service offering’ for individuals and community, and establish and monitor expectations of
users. Communication should aim to develop long-term relationships and encourage two-
way communication.
- recognise the importance of perceived value. That is the SSC should offer good value for
money, effort and time for users. For volunteer helpers and stakeholders it should provide an
opportunity to do a worthwhile job in a responsive, non-wasteful manner and should maintain
organisational credibility.
Page 24 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
25
Fig. 2: A Fundraising Model for SSCs
SOCIAL
ENTREPRENEUR /SHIP
Strategic
Planning
Soliciting
the
Resource
Promoting
Relationship
Fundraising
Involving
Volunteers
Evaluate,
Control and
Review
Situational analysis
of:
Internal environment
External environment
Identify
Potential
Sources
Select
Fundraising
Methods
Tactical
Planning
Page 25 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
26
CONCLUSION
The generic fundraising models presented in the literature do not consider any specific
contexts such as cultural background, the organisation’s size or the industry it is in, and do
not reflect the intangible help; support and advice that SSCs need to develop their fundraising
activities and expertise. SSCs can maximise their activities by emphasising the club’s unique
characteristics and using a more proactive approach to fundraising and long-term planning.
The SSCs in this study had an over-reliance upon the same short-term individual donors,
limited use of corporate sources and a lack of awareness or confidence in the wider role of
philanthropy and soliciting funds from trusts and foundations. SSC fundraising should
consider a wider variety of potential support. Managers of SSCs need to develop relevant
competencies, either by their own efforts, getting external assistance, or by identifying and
developing another individual (or group of individuals) to ensure the long term survival of
their clubs.
Ideally a SSC needs to identify and involve a relevant social entrepreneur to help the
development of the club and bring vital competence to the organisation. Social entrepreneurs
can offer knowledge, experience and commitment to the development, growth and marketing
of a social enterprise such as a SSC. They are well versed in the benefits of business
communication and relationships, more professional in how they approach commercial
organisations and are likely to have much stronger appeal within a community. With
sustained help, over time SSCs can develop strong company images built on their ability to
provide a valuable offering and one that key stakeholders can be associated with in a positive
way. Research is still at an early stage in social entrepreneurship and there are many
Page 26 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
27
opportunities for involving social entrepreneurs in SSCs’ future development. Although the
large clubs and organisations get the headlines, it is the small clubs and organisations that are
the lifeblood of sport and a myopic approach to their marketing and management can only be
to the detriment of all sports clubs.
REFERENCES
Aalto, M., (1997), Fundraising: Finanzierungsalternativen für Öffentliche Bibliotheken,
Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Aldrich, T. (2009), “Benchmarking the Fundraising Performance of UK Charities”,
International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.
353-364.
Andreoni, J. and Payne, A. A. (2003), “Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd
Out Giving or Fund-raising?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 792-812.
Anheier, H. and Toepler, S. (1997), “Philanthropic Giving and Fundraising in Europe”. In:
Burlingham, D.F. (ed.), Critical Issues in Fundraising, New York: John Wiley and
Sons, pp. 81-109.
Beech, J. and Chadwick, S. (2007), The Marketing of Sport, London: Prentice Hall.
Page 27 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
28
Bennett, R. (2007), “The Use of Marketing Metrics by British Fundraising Charities: A
Survey of Current Practice”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 23, No. 9/10, pp. 959-
989.
Bothwell, R. O. (2002), “Foundation Funding of Grassroots Organisations”, International
Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.382-392.
Botting, N. and Norton, M. (2001), The Complete Fundraising Handbook, London: The
Directory of Social Change.
Breuer, C. (2007), Sportentwicklungsbericht 2005/2006. Analyse zur Situation der
Sportvereine in Deutschland, Köln: n.a.
Breuer, C. and Wicker, P. (2010), Sportvereine in Deutschland, Available from:
www.dosb.de/de/service/download-center/sportentwicklungs-bericht/
[Accessed on 05 August 2010]
Bronzan, R.T. (1977), Public Relations, Promotions and Fund-raising For Athletic and
Physical Education Programs, New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Carpenter, J., Holmes, J. and Matthews, P. (2008), “Charity Auctions: A Field Experiment”,
The Economic Journal, Vol. 118 (January), pp. 92-113.
Page 28 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
29
Carson, D., Cromie, S., McGowan P. and Hill, J. (1995), Marketing and
Entrepreneurship in SMEs: An Innovative Approach, London: Prentice Hall.
Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C and Gronhaug, K. (2001), Qualitative Marketing
Research, London: Sage.
Chadwick, S. (2009), Sport Facing Unprecedented Problems in the Face of Global
Recession: A Commentary. Available from:
www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=1632 [Accessed on 05 August 2010].
Charmaz, K. (1983), “The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation”.
In: Bryman , A. and Bell, E. (eds), Business Research Methods, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, p. 586.
Clarke, S. (1993), The Complete Fundraising Handbook, Great Britain: Bath Press.
Clarke, S. and Norton, M. (1997), The Complete Fundraising Handbook, London: The
Directory of Social Change.
Coleman, R. (2002), “Characteristics of Volunteering in UK Sport: Lessons from Cricket”,
Managing Leisure, Vol. 7, pp. 220-238.
Page 29 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
30
Courtney, R. (1995), Planning a Fundraising Strategy, Belfast, UK: NICVA Management
Series.
Denscombe, M. (2007), The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research
Projects, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Easterby-Smith. M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2002), Management Research,
London: Sage.
Ehlers, I. (2006), Personenbezogene Kompetenzen. In: Fundraising Akademie ed.,
Fundraising: Handbuch für Grundlagen, Strategien und Methoden,. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden:
Gabler, pp. 571-584.
Enjolras, B. (2002), “Does the Commercialization of Voluntary Organizations ‘Crowd out’
Voluntary Work?”, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 375-
398.
Fabisch, N. (2006), Fundraising, München: dtv.
Ferrand, A. and McCarthy, S. (2009), Marketing the Sports Organisation, Oxon:
Routledge.
Page 30 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
31
Freyer, W. (2003), Sport-Marketing, Dresden: FIT.
Fullerton, S. and Johnson M. M. (2009), Sports Marketing in an Economic Quagmire, Paper
presented at the 7th Annual Sport Marketing Association Conference, Cleveland, Ohio.
Gallagher, D., Gilmore, A. and Alexander, N. (2009). Defining a Small Sports Club (SSC):
Towards a Conceptual Framework, Paper presented at the Academy of Marketing Annual
Conference, Leeds Metropolitan University, England.
Garrett, R. (2004), “The Response of Voluntary Sports Clubs to Sport England’s Lottery
Funding: Cases of Compliance, Change and Resistance”, Managing Leisure, Vol. 9, pp. 13-
29.
Gilmore, A. (2003), Services Marketing and Management, Sage Publications: London
Gilmore, A., Carson, D. and Grant, K. (2001), “SME Marketing in Practice”, Marketing
Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 6-11.
Haibach, M. (2002), Handbuch Fundraising, Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verlag.
Page 31 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
32
Harris, S., Mori, K. and Collins, M. (2009), “Great Expectations: Voluntary Sports Clubs
and their Role in Delivering National Policy for English Sport”, Voluntas, Vol. 20, pp.
404-423.
Heinzel, H. (2004), “Philanthropy and Fundraising in Western Europe within a Framework
of Change”, New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, Vol. 46 (Winter), pp. 101-
120.
Hirsch, A. (2008), “Analyse des Social Marketing des Kindergartens St. Elisabeth und
mögliche Verbesserungen”. Available from: www.fruehpaedagogikstudieren. de/news/thema-
des-monats/projektarbeit-andreas-hirsch.pdf [Accessed on 20 April 2010].
Hönig, H.-J. and Schulz, L. (2006), “Spenderbetreuung in Fundraising. Handbuch für
Grundlagen, Strategien und Methoden”. In: Fundraising: Handbuch für Grundlagen,
Strategien und Methoden, Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 285-298.
Humphreys, B.R. (2010), “The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Sport in North
America". In Butenko, S., Panos Pardalos, P. and Lafuente, J.G. (eds.), Optimal Strategies
in Sports Economics and Management, Springer Publications: New York.
Hunt, S.D. (2002), Foundations of Marketing Theory, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Page 32 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
33
Jank, D. (1999), Fundraising für Hochschulbibliotheken und Hochschularchive,
Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Jones, A., Loguercio, A. and Makar, A. (2003), “Orchestrating Change by Empowering
Volunteer Fundraisers: A Case Study”, New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, Vol.
39, pp. 119-130.
Kelly, K.S. (1998), Effective Fund-Raising Management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:
New Jersey.
Klein, K. (1997), “Principles and Techniques of Fund Raising”. In: Fundraising Akademie
(ed.), Fundraising: Handbuch für Grundlagen, Strategien und Methoden, Wiesbaden: Gabler,
p. 89.
Levy, J. D. (2004), “The Growth of Fundraising: Framing the Impact of Research and
Literature on Education and Training”, New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, Vol.
43 (Spring), pp. 21-30.
Lindahl, W.E. and Conley, A.T. (2002), “Literature Review: Philanthropic Fundraising”,
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 91-112.
Lindahl, W.E. (2010), Principles of Fundraising, Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett.
Page 33 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
34
Lysakowski, L. (2007), Nonprofit Essentials: The Development Plan, John Wiley & Sons
Ltd: New Jersey.
Mc Curley, S. (1994), “Recruiting and Retaining Volunteers”. In: Herman, R. D. (ed.), The
Jossey Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Management and Leadership, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, pp. 511-534.
Mason, D.S. (1999), “What is the Sports Product and Who Buys it? The Marketing of
Professional Sports Leagues”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 3 / 4, pp. 402-
418.
Masteralexis, L.P, Barr, C. A. and Hums, M.A. (2009), Principles and Practices of Sport
Management, London: Jones and Bartlett.
Mazurkiewicz, D. and Thieme, L. (2008), “Fundraising”. In: Wadsack, R. (ed.)
Handwörterbuch des Sportmanagements. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, pp. 58-60.
Mullin, B.J., Hardy, S. and Sutton, W. A. (2007), Sport Marketing, Leeds: Human Kinetics.
Papadimitriou, D. (2002), “Amateur Structures and their Effect on Performance: The Case of
Greek Voluntary Sports Clubs”, Managing Leisure, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 205-219.
Page 34 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
35
Pisarczyk, S. (2000), Fundraising für Freizeitheime: Grundlagen für handelnde Fundraising-
Didaktik und Freizeitpädagogik in den Jugendtreffs, Frankfurt am Main: Haag und Herchen.
Pearson, J. (1999), “Comprehensive Research on Alumni Relationships: Four Years of
Market Research at Stanford University”, New Directions for Institutional Research, Vol.
1999, No. 101, pp. 5-21.
Reid Howie Associates, (2006), “The Sustainablitity of Local Sports Clubs in Scotland”,
Available from: [online] www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch [Accessed on 10 August 2010].
Rieken, M. (2002), “Direct mail als fund raising-Instrument in der Politik”, Thesis (PhD),
Carl von Ossietzky-Universität.
Rosso, H.A. (1991), “A Philosophy of Fundraising”. In Tempel, E.R., Achieving Excellence
in Fundraising, John Wiley and Sons Inc.: San Francisco.
Sakires, J., Doherty, A. and Misener, K. (2009), “Role Ambiguity in Voluntary Sport
Organizations”, Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 23, pp. 615-643.
Sargeant, A. (1999), “Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behavior”, Journal of
Marketing Management, Vol. 15, pp. 215-238.
Page 35 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
36
Sargeant, A. (2009), Marketing Management for Nonprofit Organisations, Oxford UK:
Oxford University Press.
Sargeant, A. and Ewing, M. (2001), “Fundraising Direct: A Communications Guide for
Charity Marketing”, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 9, No. 1/2, pp.
185-204.
Sargeant, A. and Jay, E. (2010), Fundraising Management Analysis, Planning and Practice,
Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009), Research Methods for Business
Students, Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Seiler, T.L. (2001), Developing Your Case for Support, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Publications.
Sheth, J.N., Gardner, D.M., and Garrett, D.E. (1988) Marketing Theory. Evolution and
Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons.
Shilbury, D., Quick, S. and Westerbeek, H. (2003) Strategic Sport Marketing,
Crows Nest, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Page 36 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
37
Slack, T. and Parent, M.M. (2006), Understanding Sport Organizations,
Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Smith, S. R. (2005), “Performance Benchmarking: Lessons on Using Performance
Benchmarks to Maximize Fundraising Results”, New Directions for Philanthropic
Fundraising, Vol. 49 (Fall), pp.109-119.
Smith, H. and Dunn, M. B. (1995), “Gifts and Donors’ Expectations”. In: Elliot, D. (ed.), The
Ethics of Asking, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 101-110.
Staples, C. (2004), “What does Corporate Social Responsibility Mean for Charitable
Fundraising in the UK?”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
Marketing, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 154-158.
Stewart, B. (2007), Sport Funding and Finance. Oxford: Elsevier.
Stier, W.F. (1994), Fundraising for Sport and Recreation, USA: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Taks, M. (2010), “The Impact of the Economic Recession on Sport Participation in Local
Communities”, Paper presented at the 2010 North American Society for Sport Management
Conference, Tampa, Florida.
Page 37 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
38
Tempel, E.R., Seiler, T.L. and Aldrich, E.E. (2011), Achieving Excellence in Fundraising,
San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Urselmann, M. (2002), Fundraising: Erfolgreiche Strategien führender Nonprofit-
Organisationen, Bern: Haupt.
Wagner, L. (2004), “Fundraising, Culture, and the U.S. Perspective”, New Directions for
Philanthropic Fundraising, Vol. 46 (Winter), pp. 5-12.
Waters, R.D. (2008), “Applying Relationship Management Theory to the Fundraising
Process”, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 73-87.
Zakus, D., Skinner, J. and Edwards, A. (2009), “Social Capital in Australian Sport”, Sport in
Society, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 986-998.
Page 38 of 38
URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjsm
Journal of Strategic Marketing
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960