The Bharat Microfinance - Report 2016 - Moneymint

Supported by:

NABARD

The�Bharat�Microfinance�Report�2016

The�Bharat�Microfinance�Report�2016

Mission of Sa-Dhan

“To build the field of community development finance in India, to help its members and associate institutions to better serve low income households, particularly women, in both rural and urban India, in their quest for establishing stable livelihoods and improving their quality of life”.

With best compliments from:

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development(Printing of this document is supported by NABARD)

Mission of NABARD

“Promotion of sustainable and equitable agriculture and rural develop-ment through effective credit support, related services, institution devel-opment and other innovative initiatives”.

A 1- 248, 3rd Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi – 110029, India

Tel: + 91- 11-47174400, Fax: + 91-11-47174405E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

The Bharat Microfinance Report 2016

© Copyright reserved Sa-Dhan2016

Developed & Published by:Sa-Dhan

A 1- 248, 3rd Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi – 110029, India

Tel: + 91- 11-47174400, Fax: + 91-11-47174405E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Cover Design & Printed by:Anil

9810803375, 8860127811

Disclaimer:The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of any of the

insitutions referred to and they are not to be held responsible for the opinions/views in this report.

Preface

The Indian Microfinance Sector has witnessed a phenomenal growth over the past 17 years. The number of Institutions providing microfinance services has gone up from a few to several hundreds. The quantum

of credit made available to the poor and financially excluded clients has gone past `60,000 crore and number of clients benefitted is close to 40 million as of March 2016. The SHG bank linkage programme has equally grown to touch the lives of individuals through SHGs with an outstanding loan portfolio of `57,119 crores.

The Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India have created conducive policy and regulatory framework for Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) to operate in the country. This has provided necessary legitimacy and impetus to the sector. MFIs in general comply to the regulations, take care of client protection issues, adhere to the Industry Code of Conduct. These factors go a long way in infusing confidence among all the stakeholders.

In this context, there are three areas which continue to deserve special attention. One is the need for articulating the fact that microfinance is a strategic part of the financial inclusion agenda of the government and that of the central bank. The second is the criticality of re-demonstrating our collective intention to help the poor and the unbanked populace by way of having the right mission, social performance measures and client protection process. The third area is in projecting the fact that microfinance institutions are sustainable financial institutions and they continue to be the investible destination for bankers and investors.

In order to reemphasise these positions, the sector needs empirical data. This Bharat Microfinance Report has been designed to provide comprehensive information and newer perspectives on the above three areas. Primary data received from 166 MFIs who represent around 95 percent of the microfinance sector in India and analysis thereon form the basis for this report.

Sa-Dhan, as the leading association of community development finance institutions in India, has been publishing The Bharat Microfinance Report for the past thirteen years. This year 166 MFIs reported data, including 61 non-members of Sa-Dhan. We thank them for reposing confidence in us and valuing transparency through data reporting.

This year the substantial part of the work relating to the report has been shouldered by Mr. Ardhendu Nandi, right from data collection, consolidation, analysis to report writing in which he was ably supported by Ms. Shyamasree Nandan and Mr. P.M Kamalesh. Mr. Somesh Dayal provided a broad support to the report, especially in sourcing useful inputs.

Special thanks are due to Prime M2i Consulting Pvt. Ltd, CRIF Highmark, Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited, Grameen Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Satin Creditcare Network Limited, ItzCash, MCID-NABARD and Greenlight Planet Inc, for inputs in bringing out this report.

We are grateful to overall patronage from NABARD for generously sponsoring the publication and dissemination of the report widely among all stakeholders. We are also thankful to SIDBI, World Bank Group (IFC), DFID, RBI and Government agencies for their support to the activities and initiatives of Sa-Dhan.

We hope this report would be extremely useful to you as a reference and data source. We welcome suggestions for further enhancing its coverage and utility.

P. SatishExecutive Director14 September, 2016

iii

The Bharat Microfinance Report 2016iv

Contents

Preface iii

List of Boxes vi

List of Figures vii

List of Tables ix

List of Abbreviations x

Glossary xiii

Executive Summary xv

Chapter 1: Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with Continuity 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs) 2

1.3 Financial Inclusion Plan (FIP) 3

1.4 Committee on Medium-Term Path on Financial Inclusion 3

1.5 Roadmap for Banking Facilities 4

1.6 Financial Inclusion Advisory Committee (FIAC) 4

1.7 Mudra 4

1.8 Self Help Groups 4

1.9 Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending 5

1.10 MFIs as Channels for Govt. Programmes 5

Chapter 2: Outreach and Loan Portfolio 7

2.1 Geographical Spread of Microfinance 7

2.2 Branch Network 9

2.3 Client Outreach 14

2.3.1 Regional Outreach of MFIs 14

2.3.2 State-wise Client Outreach 15

2.3.3 Rural – Urban Share of MFIs Borrowers 16

2.3.4 Outreach to Special Segment of Borrowers (Women, SC/ST, and Minorities) 16

2.3.5 Leading MFIs in Client Outreach 17

2.4 Loan Portfolio of MFIs 18

2.4.1 Rural – Urban Share of Gross Loan Portfolio 20

2.4.2 Regional Spread of Loan Portfolio 20

2.4.3 Loan Portfolio Across States 21

2.4.4 Managed Portfolio 22

2.4.5 Business Correspondent (BC) Portfolio 23

2.4.6 Loan Outstanding per Borrower 24

2.4.7 Trends in Outreach and Outstanding Portfolio 24

2.5 Loan Disbursement 25

2.5.1 Loan Disbursement - States/UTs and Regional Pattern 26

2.5.2 Rural – Urban Share of No. of Loans Disbursed 27

2.5.3 Loan Amount Disbursed 28

2.5.4 Purpose of Loan 28

2.5.4.1 Income Generation Loans 29

2.5.4.2 Non- Income Generation Loans 29

v

Chapter 3: Operational and Financial Aspects 31

Section I: Workforce, Productivity and Portfolio Quality 31 3.1.1 Workforce in MFIs 31 3.1.2 Staff Productivity 32 3.1.3 Portfolio Quality 34

Section II: Cost & Revenue 35 3.2.1 Expenditure Analysis 35 3.2.2 Income Analysis 38 3.2.3 Margin 40 3.2.4 Yield, Cost and Margin: Performance Across MFI size 40

Section III: Surplus, Sufficiency and Profitability 41 3.3.1 Surplus 41 3.3.2 Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS) 41 3.3.3 Profitability Ratios 42

Section IV: Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure 44 3.4.1 MFI Assets 44 3.4.2 Pattern of Portfolio Financing 45 3.4.2.i Net Owned Fund (NOF) 45 3.4.2.ii Debt Financing 46 3.4.3 Capital (Net Owned Fund) to Total Asset Ratio 57 3.4.4 Leverage / Debt – Equity Ratio 58

Chapter 4: Credit Plus Activities 59 4.1 Micro Insurance 59 4.1.1 MFIs Acting as Micro Insurance Agents 60 4.2 Micro Pension 62 4.2.1 NPS: Swavalamban 62 4.2.2 Composition of NPS Subscribers 63 4.2.3 Pradhan Mantri Bima Yojana 64 4.3 Other Development Services 65 4.4 Jagruti – An Initiative to Intensify client engagement and reduce client attrition. 70

Chapter 5: SHG Movement and its Role in Financial Inclusion 765.1 Self Help Group Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) 76

5.1.1 Savings Performance of SBLP 76

5.1.2 No of SHGs Availing Bank Loan during 2015-16 78

5.1.3 Loan Outstanding with SHGs 81

5.2 Aajeevika – National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM) 84

Chapter 6: BC Model and Technology 866.1 Business Correspondent Model 866.2 Reaching doorsteps through Business Correspondents 866.3 Progress and Challenges 876.4 MFIs as Business Correspondents 896.5 Use of Technology 92

Annexures 95

State wise Presence of Different MFIs 95

District wise No. of MFIs in Operation. 98

Distribution of MFIs which Contributed data to this Report 104

Profile of MFIs which Contributed Data to this Report 106


List of Boxes

Chapter1 Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with Continuity

Box 1.1 Core Values of Microfinance 6

Chapter 2 Outreach and Loan Portfolio

Box 2.1 Responsible Finance - an Essential Component of Microfinance Industry 11

Chapter 4 Credit Plus Activities

Box 4.1 Microfinance and Affordable Clean Energy Access: 72 A Path to achieve Sustainable Development Goals

Box 4.2 Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana 73

Box 4.3 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 74

Chapter 6 BC Model And Technology

Box 6.1 Peer-to-Peer Lending 88

Box 6.2 Cashless Project - Journey so far 93

vi

List of Figures


Figure 2.1 Top 10 MFIs Operating in Number of Indian States/Union Territories 8

Figure 2.2 Top 10 MFIs Operating in Number of Indian Districts 8

Figure 2.3 MFI Branch Network – Yearly Trend and Category –wise Breakup 10

Figure 2.4 Top 10 MFIs in Terms of Branch Network 10

Figure 2.5 Outreach to Borrowers: Yearly Trend and Category – wise Breakup for 2015-16 14

Figure 2.6 Regional break up of Client Outreach 14

Figure 2.7 Trends in Rural – Urban Share of MFI Borrowers 17

Figure 2.8 List of Top 10 MFIs with Client Outreach as of March 2016 17

Figure 2.9 Gross Loan Portfolio – Yearly Trend and Category–wise Breakup for 2015-16 19

Figure 2.10 Percentage of Rural – Urban Share of Gross Loan Portfolio 20

Figure 2.11 Region wise Loan Portfolio 20

Figure 2.12 Managed Loan Portfolio – Yearly Trend and Category–wise Breakup for 2015-16 23

Figure 2.13 BC Loan Portfolio and Category–wise Breakup for 2015-16 23

Figure 2.14 Loan Outstanding per Borrower yearly trend and across regions for the FY 2015-16 24

Figure 2.15 Growth Fluctuations in Outreach and Loan Outstanding over the Years 24

Figure 2.16 Loan Disbursement over the years 25

Figure 2.17 Regional Pattern of Loan Disbursement 25

Figure 2.18 Top 10 MFIs in Loan Disbursement during 2015-16 27

Figure 2.19 Percentage of Rural – Urban Share of No. of Loans Disbursed 27

Figure 2.20 Share of income generation loans and non income generation loans 28

Figure 2.21 Share of MFIs Income Generation Loans under Different Sub-sectors as of March 2016 29

Figure 2.22 Share of MFIs Non-Income Generation Loans under Different Sub-sectors as of March 2016 29

Chapter 3.1 Workforce, Productivity And Portfolio Quality

Figure 3.1.1 No. of MFI Staff - Yearly Trend and MFI-Category-wise Break-up 31

Figure 3.1.2 MFI Field Staff vs Other Staff Distribution – 2015 & 2016 31

Figure 3.1.3 New Staff Recruited by the MFIs over the years 32

Figure 3.1.4 Distribution of MFIs based on clients served per Staff & per Credit Officer 33

Figure 3.1.5 ABCO Across MFIs 33

Figure 3.1.6 Distribution of MFIs Based on Loan Portfolio per Credit Officer 34

Figure 3.1.7 MFI Loan Portfolio at Risk (PAR) 34

Figure 3.1.8 Distribution of MFIs Based on PAR 34

Chapter 3.2 Cost and Revenue

Figure 3.2.1 Break up of Expenses by Indian MFIs 35

Figure 3.2.2 Break up of Expenses by Indian MFIs based on Portfolio size 36

Figure 3.2.3 Operating Expenditure Ratio across MFIs 36

Figure 3.2.4 Finance Cost Ratio Across MFI Categories 37

Figure 3.2.5 Trends of OER and FCR 38

Figure 3.2.6 Break-up of Income 38

Figure 3.2.7 Yield Trend of MFIs 39

Figure 3.2.8 Yield on Portfolio across MFIs 39

Figure 3.2.9 Yield, Cost and Margin of MFIs –size wise 40

vii


Chapter 3.3 Surplus, Sufficiency and Profitability

Figure 3.3.1 OSS Across MFIs 41

Figure 3.3.2 OSS based on average loan size 42

Figure 3.3.3 OSS based on yield category 42

Figure 3.3.4 OSS based on OER of MFIs 42

Figure 3.3.5 Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) across MFI types 43

Figure 3.3.6 Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) of MFI-Size wise 43

Chapter 3.4 Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure

Figure 3.4.1 MFI Total Assets- Yearly Trend 44

Figure 3.4.2 Composition of Total Assets of MFIs 44

Figure 3.4.3 MFI Equity Outstanding - Yearly Trend and MFI- Category- wise Break-up of 2016 Figure 45

Figure 3.4.4 Fresh Equity Raised by MFIs and MFI-Category-wise Break-up 46

Figure 3.4.5 Top 10 MFIs in terms of Equity Raised 46

Figure 3.4.6 Sources of funding based on types of instruments 47

Figure 3.4.7 Sources of funding based on Institution types 47

Figure 3.4.8 Outstanding Borrowing – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2016 Figure 48

Figure 3.4.9 Fund Received during the year – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2016 Figure 48

Figure 3.4.10 Source wise Share of Loans lent among Different Legal Forms of MFIs during 2015-16 49

Figure 3.4.11 Capital to Total Asset Ratio 58

Figure 3.4.12 Debt - Equity Ratio Trend and Break–up of 2016 Figure Across MFI –Categories 58


Figure 4.1 Composition of NPS Subscribers 63

Figure 4.2 Most Recalled Theme 70

Figure 4.3 Mode of Delivery 71

Chapter 5 SHG Movement and its Role in Financial Inclusion

Figure 5.1 Historical Trend in Credit Linkage and Bank Loan Disbursed 76

Figure 5.2 All India Trend in SHG Savings Amount Held in the Indian Banking System 77

Figure 5.3 All India Trend in Average per SHG Savings Held in the Banking System 77

Figure 5.4 Savings of SHGs with Banks as on 31 March 2016 78

Figure 5.5 No. of SHGs availed Bank Loan during 2015-16 from the Banking System 78

Figure 5.6 Top 10 Banks in terms of Savings 79

Figure 5.7 All India Trend in Bank Loan Amount Disbursed to SHGs 79

Figure 5.8 Agency-wise loan disbursement – No. of SHGs and Loan Amount disbursed 80

Figure 5.9 Top 10 Banks in terms of Disbursement 80

Figure 5.10 All India Trend in Average Bank Loan Amount Disbursed per SHG 81

Figure 5.11 All India Trend in SHG Loan Outstanding in the Books of Banking System 81

Figure 5.12 All India Trend in Average per SHG Loan Outstanding in the Banking System 82

Figure 5.13 Agency-wise Bank Loan outstanding against SHGs as on 31 March 2016 82

Figure 5.14 Non Performing Asset Per Cent of SHG Loans with Banks 83

Figure 5.15 NPAs of Banks against SHGs Loan Outstanding 83

viii

List of Tables


Table 2.1 No. of MFIs in Indian States/UTs 7

Table 2.2 No. of MFIs in Indian States/UTs and No. of Districts with MFI Operations 9

Table 2.3 Outreach (in lakh) of MFIs across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (decreasing order) 15

Table 2.4 Composition of Borrowers – Category wise 17

Table 2.5 List of Top MFIs with Loan Portfolio as of March 2016 19

Table 2.6 Loan Portfolio Outstanding across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (decreasing order) 21

Table 2.7 Loan Disbursement across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (decreasing order) 26

Table 2.8 Amount disbursed during the year 2015 and 2016 28

Chapter 3.1 Workforce, Productivity And Portfolio Quality

Table 3.1.1 Yearly trend of Total Staff vs Women Staff 32

Table 3.1.2 Staff Turn-over among MFIs during 2015-16 32

Chapter 3.4 Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure

Table 3.4.1 List of lenders reported among Top 10 Lenders of the individual reporting MFIs 49

(in terms of Outstanding as of March 2016)

Table 3.4.2 MFI wise Loan Outstanding (based top 10 Lenders data) to Lenders 51

Table 3.4.3 Lender wise Loan Outstanding (based top 10 Lenders data) to MFIs 54


Table 4.1 MFIs involved in Micro Insurance- Health 61

Table 4.2 MFIs involved in Micro Insurance - Non-health 62

Table 4.3 MFIs involved in Micro Pension 65

Table 4.4 Development Services of Reporting MFIs 65

Table 4.5 MFIs and Livelihoods Intervention 66

Table 4.6 MFIs and General Education Intervention 67

Table 4.7 MFIs and Preventive Healthcare Initiatives 68

Chapter 5 SHG Movement And Its Role In Financial Inclusion

Table 5.1 Present Status of NRLM 85

Chapter 6 BC Model And Technology

Table 6.1 Financial Inclusion Plan-Summary Progress of all Banks including RRBs 87

Table 6.2 MFIs as Banking Correspondents – No. of saving clients and amount saved 89

Table 6.3 MFIs as Banking Correspondents – No. of Loan clients, amount disbursed and amount outstanding 90

ix


List of Abbreviations

x

1 ABCO Active Borrowers per Credit Officer

2 APY Atal Pension Yojana

3 ATM Automated Teller Machine

4 AUM Assets Under Management

5 BC Business Correspondent

6 BCNM Business Correspondent Network Manager

7 BF Business Facilitator

8 BPL Below Poverty Line

9 BSBDA Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account

10 CAB College of Agricultural Banking

11 CAR Capital Adequacy Ratio

12 CBEO Community Based Economic Organization

13 CBS Core Banking Solution

14 CDR Corporate Debt Restructuring

15 CEO Chief Executive Officer

16 CGT Compulsory Group Training

17 CIB Credit Information Bureau

18 CIF Community Investment Fund

19 CmF Centre for Micro Finance

20 CO Credit Officer

21 CoC Code of Conduct

22 COCA Code of Conduct Assessment

23 CPPs Client Protection Principles

24 CRM Customer Relationship Management

25 CRR Cash Reserve Ratio

26 CSO Customer Service Officer

27 CSP Customer Service Point

28 DFS Department of Financial Services

29 DNBS Department of Non-Banking Supervision

30 DPD Days Past Due

31 DRDA District Rural Development Agency

32 DWCD Department of Women and Child Development

33 ECB External Commercial Borrowing

34 FCR Finance Cost Ratio

35 FDI Foreign Direct Investment

36 FER Finance Expense Ratio

37 FI Financial Institution

38 FIAC Financial Inclusion Advisory Committee

39 FIIs Foreign Institutional Investors

40 FIP Financial Inclusion Plan

41 FLCs Financial Literacy Centre

42 GCC General Credit Card

43 GIC General Insurance Corporation of India

xi

44 GLP Gross Loan Portfolio

45 GoI Government of India

46 GPRS General Packet Radio Service

47 GRT Group Recognition Test

48 HTTP Hyper Text Transfer Protocol

49 ICIB Inclusive Credit Information Bureau

50 ICT Information and Communication Technology

51 IMPS Immediate Payment Service

52 IPOs Initial Public Offerings

53 IRDA Insurance Regulatory Development Authority

54 IVR Interactive Voice Response

55 JLG Joint Liability Group

56 KCC Kisan Credit Card

57 KYC Know Your Customer

58 LAB Local Area Bank

59 MFDRC Micro Finance and Development Regulatory Council

60 MFIs Microfinance Institutions

61 MHL Mobile High-Definition Link

62 MIS Management Information System

63 MoA Memorandum of Association

64 MoF Ministry of Finance

65 MoRD Ministry of Rural Development

66 MoU Memorandum of Understanding

67 MSME Ministry of Micro Small & Medium Enterprises

68 MUDRA Micro Units Development & Refinance Agency

69 NABARD National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

70 NAMCABs National Mission for Capacity Building of Bankers

71 NBFC Non-Banking Finance Company

72 NBFC -SI -ND Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking NBFCs

73 NBFC-ND Non Deposit taking NBFCs

74 NCD Non-Convertible Debenture

75 NGO Non-Governmental Organization

76 NIM Net Interest Margin

77 NoF Net Owned Fund

78 NPA Non Performing Asset

79 NPCI National Payment Corporation of India

80 NPS National Pension System

81 NRLM National Rural Livelihood Mission

82 NULM National Urban Livelihood Mission

83 OD Overdraft

84 OER Operating Expense Ratio

85 OSS Operational Self Sufficiency

86 P2P Peer-to-Peer

87 PAR Portfolio at Risk


88 PFRDA Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority

89 PLF Primary Level Federation

90 PMDJY Pardhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana

91 PMMY Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana

92 POS Point of Sale

93 PSIG Poorest State Inclusive Growth

94 PSL Priority Sector Lending

95 PSLCs Priority Sector Lending Certificates

96 PSU Public Sector Unit

97 RBI Reserve Bank of India

98 RF Revolving Fund

99 RFF Responsible Finance Forum

100 RFIP Rural Financial Institutions Programme

101 RIDF Rural Infrastructure Development Fund

102 RMK Rashtriya Mahila Kosh

103 RoA Return on Asset

104 RoE Return on Equity

105 RRBs Regional Rural Banks

106 RSETIs Rural Self Employment Training Institutes

107 SBLP Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Programme

108 SC/ST Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe

109 SERP Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty

110 SFB Small Finance Bank

111 SHGs Self-Help Groups

112 SHPI Self Help Promoting Institute

113 SIDBI Small Industries Development Bank of India

114 SLBCs State Level Bankers’ Committees

115 SLR Statutory Liquidity Ratio

116 SMS Short Message Service

117 SPM Social Performance Management

118 SPOC Single Point Of Contact

119 SRO Self-Regulatory Organisation

120 TAT Turn Around Time

121 UCBs Urban Cooperative Banks

122 UT Union Territory

123 Y-O-Y Year On Year

xii

Glossary

ABCO

ABCO is an acronym for Average Borrower per Credit Officer, a measure of client-staff ratio. It is also known as Case Load

Average Loan Size

Average Loan size represents the client-per capita loan amount. It is calculated as: The Loan portfolio divided by the number of clients of an MFI.

Borrowing Cost

The total charge for taking on a debt obligation that can involve interest payments and other financing fees.

Capital Adequacy

Capital Adequacy is the means of measuring the solvency level of MFIs which is an important indicator of risk bearing ability of the entities. It is the proportion of the capital/own fund held by an MFI against its total asset

Capital to Total Assets

Ratio of net worth to total assets

Debt-Equity Ratio

Debt-Equity Ratio is the proportion of total debt borrowed to the total equity held at a given point of time.

Debt Funding

Debt Funding refers to the percentage of loan portfolio funded by outside borrowings

External Cost

External Cost here refers to Finance cost which is determined by the lending rate of banks and hence is beyond the control of MFIs

Finance Cost

Finance Cost here refers to the interest and other expenses incurred on average bank loan outstanding in the books of MFIs. This does not include notional cost of utilizing the equity fund.

Financial Inclusion

Financial Inclusion is the delivery of financial services at affordable costs to sections of disadvantaged and low income segments of society.

Margin

Margin refers to the difference between the finance cost on portfolio and the total yield on portfolio. This term is anal-ogous to the concept of Net Interest Margin (NIM) widely used in banking parlance. Margin Cap refers to the ceiling of Margin of 12 percent fixed by RBI.

Managed Loan Portfolio

Managed Loan Portfolio is the loan asset originated by MFIs and later sold to banks for getting liquidity. The MFIs continue to manage it i.e. collection of repayment on behalf of the banks which purchased the portfolio.

xiii


Non Performing Assets (NPA)

A debt obligation where the borrower has not paid any previously agreed upon interest and principal repayments to the designated lender for an extended period of time. The NPA is therefore not yielding any income to the lender in the form of principal and interest payments.

Operating Expense Ratio (OER)

Ratio of staff, travel, administration costs, other overheads and depreciation charges of the MFIs (non-financial costs) to the average loan portfolio during a year

Operating Self Sufficiency (OSS)

Operating Self Sufficiency (OSS) shows the sufficiency of income (operating income and investment income) earned by MFIs to cover the cost like operating cost, loan loss provision and finance cost, incurred for conducting the operations.

Portfolio Quality

Amount of risk of default in the loan portfolio. A high quality portfolio contains a lower amount of risk. Portfolio quality changes continually as loans are disbursed, payments are made, and payments become due.

Portfolio at Risk (PAR)

PAR indicates the proportion of outstanding amounts of all loan accounts having past due/arrears to the total out-standing loan. In general, PAR 60, i.e., the portfolio / part of the portfolio remaining unpaid 60 days and beyond crossing the due date, would be used as a measure to assess the portfolio quality.

Qualifying Assets

Qualifying Assets are loan portfolios created by MFIs adhering to certain conditions to make the MFIs eligible to be called as MFIs and to raise loans from banks under Priority Sector Advances Scheme ( as per recent RBI norms).

Return on Asset (RoA)

Return on Asset (RoA) is the universally accepted profitability measure which, in essence, is the percentage net in-come earned out of total average asset deployed by MFIs during a given period, say a year.

Return on Equity (RoE)

Return on Equity (RoE) is the net income earned out of average equity of MFIs held by MFIs during the given period.

Self Help Groups (SHGs)

SHGs refer to groups of 10-20 women coming together to form a semi formal community based institution to meet their common financial and social needs.

SHG Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP)

SHGs are linked to mainstream banks for depositing surplus savings of the SHGs and to obtain loans. It is considered to be an effective strategy to ensure financial inclusion.

Surplus

Surplus is Yield minus Total cost

Yield on Portfolio

Yield represents total income from microcredit operation-Interest income, processing fee/ service charge – earned out of average loan portfolio outstanding. It does not, include investment income. It is a good proxy / surrogate for loan interest rate.

xiv

Executive Summary

Context

For the microfinance sector in India the year 2015 -16 was one of steady growth and stability, though

some islands of heavy growth should be a matter of concern. RBI’s continuing interest in the sector is

reflected in its engagement with both the SROs of the Microfinance sector-Sa-Dhan and MFIN, and coming

out with modifications and improvements in guidelines whenever required.

At the policy level, MUDRA’s progress reflects the depth of financing by the MFIs. The Pradhan Mantri Bima

Yojana (PMBY) and the Atal Pension Yojana provide additional financial instruments for MFIs to offer to

their clientele. Bandhan Bank which rose from the microfinance sector completed one year of its service,

Capital Small Finance Bank was the first SFB to start off its operations and other Small Finance Banks and

Payment Banks will be in place by the close of the financial year. Further, RBI is coming up with guidelines

for Peer To Peer lending. These are game changers for the banking and financial sector landscape of the

country in general and for financial inclusion scenario in particular.

Objective

This report is an attempt to collect primary data on MFI client outreach, their loan portfolio and other

financials of MFIs in India that includes both members as well as non-members of Sa-Dhan.

The report purports to provide primary data based analytical information to a wide range of stakeholders

such as the Government, policymakers, regulators, banks, investors, researchers, media, MFIs and others,

helping them to understand the current status and the underlying trends in the sector in order to take

appropriate decisions/actions that are critical for the development of the industry.

Methodology

The contributing MFIs have voluntarily provided their data and detailed information as sought through a

data acquisition sheet consisting of their financial outreach, geographic spread, credit plus and developmental

activities etc. For this report we have compiled data from MFIs representing all legal forms (Societies, Trusts,

Sec-8 Companies, NBFC-MFIs, Cooperatives) the data has been collated, validated, and analysed for peer

groups.

The project team rigorously scrutinized the self reported data, validated it from the MFI’s financial statements,

and reconciled from other secondary sources. The validity of the findings however, is subject to the accuracy

of the self-reported data, though reconciliation techniques used would have minimized such errors.

The analysis of the report was undertaken on the basis of a predesigned framework and the findings have

been improved to the extent possible though advisory inputs from microfinance experts and practitioners.

The chapters pertaining to SHGs and the BC model, while culled out from secondary sources, have been

further enhanced by inputs from the experts in the field.

The Report Coverage

The report is divided into two parts. Part one covers the MFI sector and is based on primary data, whereas

Part two covers the SHG sector and the BC model and is mainly culled out from secondary sources of

information.

xv


Part 1 is further divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 represents an overview of the microfinance sector

within the larger ambit of financial inclusion, Chapter 2 deals with growth and outreach of MFIs, Chapter

3 deals with operational and financial aspects of credit services, while Chapter 4 deals with credit plus

activities. Chapter 3 is further subdivided into 4 sections. Section 1 dwells upon the workforce, productivity

and portfolio quality. Section 2 represents the cost and revenue aspects of the MFIs. Section-3 represents

surplus, sufficiency and profitability of the MFIs, while Section 4 deals with capital structure and balance

sheet distribution.

In the Part 2 of the report, Chapter 5 deals with the SHG section of microfinance and Chapter 6 presents an

overview of the BC model and other technology led approaches of financial inclusion.

Highlights of the Report

Growth and Outreach

MFIs currently operate in 29 States, 4 Union Territories and 588 districts in India. The reported 166 MFIs

with a branch network of 12,221 employees have reached out to an all time high of 39 million clients with

an outstanding loan portfolio of `63,853 crore. This includes a managed portfolio of `16,914 crore. Out of

managed portfolio, BC portfolio accounts for `7,984 crore. The average loan outstanding per borrower

stood at `11,425 and 94% of loans were used for income generation purposes.

Outreach grew by 8% and loan outstanding grew by 31% over the previous year. The Southern region

continues to have the highest share of both outreach and loans outstanding, followed by East. However

growth rates are higher in the Northeastern and Central regions. Outreach proportion of urban clientele

has decreased marginally as against the rural population. The proportion of urban clientele which was 67%

in 2014-15 decreased to 62% in 2015-16. Women borrowers constitute 97% of the total clientele of MFIs,

SC/ST borrowers constitute 30% and minorities 27%.

Of the total, NBFC-MFIs contribute to 85% of clients outreach and 88% of outstanding portfolio, while NGO

MFIs contribute to the remaining. MFIs with portfolio size of more than `500 crore contribute significantly

to the total outreach (85%) and loan outstanding (88%) of the sector.

Operational and Financial Aspects

MFI sector employs 1,03,415 personnel, out of which 15% are women, and 62% are field staff. An active

borrower per credit officer (ABCO) is 440, which is higher than the previous year indicating higher focus

on client services without much of staff growth.

Financial expense is the major expense (53%) incurred by MFIs. Personnel expense and other administrative

expenses contribute 24% and 23% respectively. Median OER (Operating Expense Ratio) and FCR (Finance

Cost Ratio) remained at 10.2% and 13.83% respectively. It is seen that the OER comes down with scale of

operation. MFIs, with portfolio of more than `500 crore have a median OER of 7.5% and FCR of 13.9%.

The Yield of the sector for the year was 21%, which is the highest for the Section 8 Companies and

Cooperatives (24%) and lowest for the Society/Trust (20%). The Margin for different types of institutions

was in the range of 9 -12%. NBFC-MFIs maintained a median margin of 10%. Median OSS (Operational Self

Sufficiency) is 113%. Approximately 16% of MFIs have OSS less than 100%. This includes 4% of the NBFC-

MFIs on account of AP portfolio and 12% not for profit MFIs. Generally, the OSS improves with the average

loan size and yield of the institution.

xvi

Median ROA and ROE for the sector remained at 2.2% and 11.6% respectively. The returns are generally

higher for not for profit MFIs and very large sized MFIs.

The CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio) for all types of MFIs remained above the desirable level of 15%. NBFC-

MFIs have CAR of 20.1%. Leveraging of the sector was 3.2. The sector received a sum of `39,331 crore,

which includes a portfolio sale of `8,834 crore. Total outstanding borrowing of MFIs stood at `44,822 crore,

with a substantial share of this derived by NBFC-MFIs (97%) especially from the very large MFIs (87%).

Self-Help Groups and the BC model

Number of SHGs linked to credit and bank loan amount to SHGs has witnessed an increasing trend after

2010-11. The number of saving linked SHGs has also n increased during the year.; till date, 103 million

families have been covered under the SBLP program with a total number of 79.03 lakh SHGs with a saving

amount of `13,691 crores. A total of 46 lakh SHGs have a gross loan outstanding of `57,119 crores.

The amount of savings and the average per SHG savings (`14,662) held in the banking system are both

increasing since 2011-12. Average loan disbursed per SHG for 2015-16 is reported at `203,526, whereas

average loan outstanding per SHG stood at `122,258

The aggregate NPA of SHG loans remain a concern though it has declined marginally by 0.59% from 7.4%

in 2014-15 to 6.4% in 2015-16. Quality of SHGs, their performance has emerged as one of the major issues

affecting the movement.

Also the fact that NRLM will push for improvement in the SHG bank linkage with better monitoring, lower

rates of interest and a sharper focus on livelihood generation, would give a greater fillip to the growth of

SHG programme.

MFIs are finding the BC model increasingly attractive to carry out their activities on the credit side and to

spread it to deposit taking activities 51MFIs had an exposure to a BC loan portfolio of ̀ 7,191 crores through

linkage to 25 banks. Apart from this 13 MFIs were undertaking deposit related activities for 13 banks. The

deposit portfolio of BCs amounted to `871 crores.

xvii


Indicators: MFI Model 2016 2015 Change

Client Outreach 399 lakh 371 lakh

Women Clients 97% 97% No Change

SC/ST Clients 30% 28%

Other Minorities 27% 18%

Rural Clients 38% 33%

Gross Outstanding Portfolio `63853 Cr. `48882 Cr

Own Portfolio `46939 Cr. `39028 Cr

Managed Portfolio `16914 Cr. `9854 Cr

Avg. Loan per Borrower `11425 `13162

Income Generation Loan 94% 80%

Female Staff in MFIs 15% 16%

ABCO 440 419

OER 10.22% 11.45%

FCR 13.3% 12.42%

Yield 21% 24%

Margin 10.00% 10.20%

OSS 113% 113% No Change

ROA 2.2% 1.73%

ROE 11.6% 8.19%

CAR 19.39% 19.10%

Leverage 3.2 2.9

Fund Flow (Outstanding) `44822 Cr. `40802 Cr

Equity Outstanding `4509 Cr. `4195 Cr

NPA 0.15% 0.21%

SHG Model

Total No of SHGs Linked 79.03 lakh 77.12 lakh

No. of Families Reached 103 million 101 million

Total Savings of SHGs `13691 Cr `11307 Cr

Total No. of SHGs Credit Linkage 18.32 lakh 16.26 lakh

Gross Loan Outstanding `57119 Cr `51721 Cr

Total Loan Disbursed `37286 Cr `30334 Cr

Avg. Loan Disbursed per SHG `203526 `186556

Avg. Loan Outstanding per SHG `122258 `115759

NPA 6.45% 7.40%

Performance Highlights: A Snapshot

xviii

Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with Continuity 1

Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with ContinuityChapter 1

1.1 Introduction

Developments in the year give us the confidence to claim that we are progressing well on the path to achieving universal financial inclusion. The government, regulators and financial markets have shown

immense faith in the model of financial inclusion which we have been pursuing. Provisional licenses provided to the Small Finance Banks and successful Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of Ujjivan and Equitas are a testimony to that. The MFIs which had obtained provisional licenses are well on their course to establish Small Finance Banks and are expected to overcome their limitations of currently being able to offer only a limited set of products to their clients. Bandhan Bank which just celebrated the first anniversary of its establishment is already providing a gamut of services and experience to its customers, majority of whom are microfinance clients.

MFIs are beginning to enjoy benefits of scale and there is evidence that they are passing on this benefit to clients in terms of reduction in interest rates. In fact, the top 10 NBFC-MFIs contributing 80% of the sector’s Gross Loan Portfolio or over `40,000 crores have a weighted average interest rate of 23.13%, far below the 26% max cap under PSL guidelines. Sa-Dhan data shows that over 36 NBFC-MFI members have reduced rates significantly in the last financial year itself.

There are also efforts to reduce cash transactions to reduce risks and increase efficiency. Advances in the adoption of technology coupled with the banks accounts opened under the Prime Minister Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) have certainly helped in doing this.

1.1.1 Credit History of Clients

Building a credit history for the microfinance clients goes a long way in achieving universal financial inclusion. Directions from the RBI and industry’s code of conduct require all the MFIs to share their data to the credit bureaus. Enhanced penetration of Aadhaar is helping increase accuracy of data obtained from Credit Bureaus and improving credit appraisal. Recent directions from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to share details of individuals borrowings from the SHGs to the Credit Bureaus is expected to further enhance their utility and effectiveness.

1.1.2 Revised Code of Conduct

This year the revised Code Conduct for sector which is forward looking was adopted despite some voices in favour of dilution of some of the provisions. MFIs have taken steps to implement this revised code of conduct in letter and spirit. Reports from our field visits suggest that MFIs are disclosing interest rates and other terms and conditions to the borrowers in clear terms. They have also set up effective grievance redressal mechanisms.

1.1.3 Risk Management Issues

Reports from Sa-Dhan’s field visits also point out to several risks which the MFIs and their clients may be facing. There is evidence of pockets with concentration of several MFIs in a limited geographical area which has the potential to lead to over-indebtedness and other undesirable practices. There is also evidence of some unauthorized agents acting on behalf of the MFIs and unscrupulous organisations posing as MFIs. In a rush to grow, the MFIs should not overlook the importance of having good internal controls and training their field staff.


1.1.4 Product Development

Product development is another area in which the MFIs need to invest more. Much of the portfolio growth so far has come from the standard income generation loans. MFIs need to be cognizant of the fact that clients need credit for various purposes including water and sanitation, housing and education. Limited experience of various MFIs in these needs to be documented and shared. There is also a greater need for MFIs to expand their portfolio to credit plus products like microinsurance and micropensions.

A large numbers of MFIs have been providing micro insurance products and micropensions. As per the self-reported data, 15 MFIs have reached to 3.66 lakh clients for health products, 39 MFIs have reached to 55.38 lakh clients for non-health products and 11 MFIs have been providing micropensions services to 18.59 lakhs clients.

1.2PrioritySectorLendingCertificates(PSLCs)In the meanwhile RBI has taken several steps to ease the process of financial inclusion. One of these is the introduction of Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs). This scheme of PSLCs was introduced in April 2016. The Reserve Bank provided a platform to enable trading in the certificates through its core banking solution (CBS) portal (e-Kuber). All scheduled commercial banks (including RRBs), urban co-operative banks, small finance banks (when they become operational) and local area banks are eligible to participate in trading. Some of the main features of the scheme are:

• Four kinds of PSLCs: Agriculture, Small and Marginal farmers (SF/MF), Micro enterprises and General can be bought and sold via the platform.

• The certificates will have a standard lot size of `2.5 million and its multiples.

• There will be no transfer of credit risk on underlying assets as there is no transfer of tangible assets or related cash flows.

• Banks will be permitted to issue PSLCs up to 50 per cent of the previous year’s priority sector lending achievement without having the underlying in their books. Banks should meet priority sector targets through direct lending and net PSLCs.

• Banks may be required to invest in the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF)/other funds to the extent of the shortfall.

• A bank with a shortfall in achieving any sub-target (for example, SF/MF, micro enterprises) will have to buy specific PSLCs to achieve the target. However, if a bank has a shortfall only with respect to the overall target, it could buy any PSLC.

• PSLCs will not be valid beyond the reporting date (March 31), irrespective of the date of first sale.

• A bank’s priority sector lending achievement will be computed as the sum of outstanding priority sector loans and the net nominal value of the PSLCs issued and purchased. Such computation will be done separately where sub-targets are prescribed as on the reporting date

Further in a move to boost entrepreneurial sensitivity among banks’ field-level functionaries, the Reserve Bank in collaboration with the College of Agricultural Banking (CAB), Pune, launched the National Mission for Capacity Building of Bankers for financing the MSME sector (NAMCABS). Since its inception, NAMCABS has imparted training to about 3,000 bankers.


1.3 FinancialInclusionPlan(FIP)

Financial Inclusion Plan (FIP) initiated by RBI saw a steady progress during the year. This plan (FIP) provides a structured and planned approach to financial inclusion with a commitment at the highest echelons within banks in terms of Board approval of the plans. Out of 2,259 rural bank branches opened during April 2015-March 2016, 1,670 branches were opened in unbanked rural centres under FIP. Around 71 million basic savings bank deposit accounts were added taking the total to 469 million by March 2016. The total number of small farm sector credits (Kisan Credit Cards) and small non-farm sector credits (General Credit Cards) stood at 47 million and 11 million, respectively. With the conclusion of FIP’s Phase II (2013-16) on March 31, 2016, all domestic scheduled commercial banks (including RRBs) were advised to set new Board approved FIP targets for the next three years (April 2016 to March 2019).

1.4 CommitteeonMedium-TermPathonFinancialInclusion

The Committee on Medium-Term Path on Financial Inclusion, Chaired by Mr Deepak Mohanty, ED, RBI, which was constituted to work out a medium-term (five year) measurable action plan for financial inclusion, submitted its report in December 2015. The Committee recognised that substantial progress had been made in terms of access to financial products and services especially after the launch of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY). The Committee identified significant gaps in terms of usage, inadequate ‘last mile’ service delivery, exclusion of women and small and marginal farmers and a very low formal link for micro and small enterprises. Against this background, the committee set a much wider vision of financial inclusion as ‘convenient’ access to a basket of basic formal financial products and services that should include savings, remittances, credit, government-supported insurance and pension products to small and marginal farmers and low-income households at reasonable costs with adequate protection progressively supplemented by social cash transfers. The Committee also suggested increasing micro and small enterprises’ access to formal finance with a greater reliance on technology to cut costs and improve service delivery, such that by 2021 over 90 per cent of the hitherto underserved sections of society become active stakeholders in economic progress empowered by formal finance.

Some of the recommendations of the committee are:

1. Welfare scheme “Sukanya Shiksha” for the girl child with a view to linking education with banking habits.

2. A low-cost solution based on mobile technology for enhancing the effectiveness of last mile delivery as also to facilitate usage.

3. Phasing out of the interest subvention scheme and ploughing the amount into universal crop insurance.

4. An open specialised interest-free window with simple products like demand deposits, agency and participation securities, offering products based on cost-plus financing, deferred payment and deferred delivery contracts.

5. Exploring a system of professional credit intermediaries / advisors for MSMEs to help bridge the information gap and thereby help banks take better credit decisions.

6. Creating a registry for BCs, encouraging BC certification / training programmes.

7. Inter-operability for pre-paid instruments and mobile transactions.

8. Strengthening the financial literacy centre (FLC) network and grievance redressal mechanism and devising a scheme based on transparent criteria that incentivises banks to expeditiously address customer grievances.


1.5RoadmapforBankingFacilitiesIn its Roadmap for Banking Facilities in Unbanked Villages, RBI initially advised the banks to complete Phase II of the roadmap for covering all 490,298 unbanked villages with population less than 2,000 by March 31, 2016. The timeline was advanced to August 14, 2015 in view of the on-going implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY). At end-March 2016, as reported by the State Level Bankers’ Committees (SLBCs), 450,686 villages (91.9 per cent of the target) had been covered by 14,901 branches, 415,207 villages through BCs and 20,578 villages through other modes such as ATMs and mobile vans. Keeping in view the necessity of brick and mortar branches for promoting banking penetration and financial inclusion, a roadmap for establishing such branches in villages with population above 5,000 but without a bank branch of a scheduled commercial bank was rolled out in December 2015. SLBC convenor banks have been advised to ensure opening of bank branches under this roadmap by March 2017.

1.6 FinancialInclusionAdvisoryCommittee(FIAC)

The Reserve Bank set up an advisory body, the FIAC, in 2012 to review financial inclusion policies on an on-going basis and to provide expert advice to the Reserve Bank in this matter. Given the renewed focus on financial inclusion by the Government of India, the on-going implementation of the PMJDY and the need for convergence of the efforts of various stakeholders, FIAC was re-constituted in June 2015. Its revised terms of reference include: (i) preparing a national strategy for financial inclusion which aims at converging financial inclusion efforts of various stakeholders and PMJDY, apart from monitoring the progress; (ii) monitoring progress on FIP; and (iii) monitoring progress on financial literacy. Sa-Dhan is a member of this Committee.

1.7 MUDRA

Micro Units Development & Refinance Agency Limited (MUDRA) and Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) were launched on 08 April 2015 by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi. The guidelines of PMMY issued by Department of Financial Services (DFS), GOI indicated that all banks are required to lend to microenterprises engaged in manufacturing, processing, trading and service sector activities for a loan upto `10 lakh. Further, it was also advised that the loan may be given in three categories, i.e. Loan upto `50,000 under Shishu; `50,000 to `5 lakh under Kishor; and `5 lakh to `10 lakh under Tarun. Also, it was envisaged that more focus will have to be given for the Shishu category. A target of `1,22,188 crore was set for F.Y. 2015-16.

As against the target of `122188 crore, the Banks and MFIs together have disbursed `132954.73 crore, thereby achieving 109%. The achievements by Public Sector Banks indicate a substantial credit growth in this segment. Based on the data collected from the PSBs, it was seen that the disbursement by these banks in this segment was around `33,000 crore during the 2014-15 which has recorded a growth of 70% during 2015-16.

The Union Cabinet has given its approval for the creation of a credit guarantee fund for Micro Units Development Refinance Agency (MUDRA) loans. The fund is expected to guarantee more than `1 lakh crore worth of loans to micro and small units.

1.8 SelfHelpGroups

Self Help Group Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) is a step to bring the “unbanked” poor into the formal banking system and to inculcate thrift and credit habits. A natural corollary is for the group members to graduate into seeking better livelihood opportunities through access to credit from financial institutions.


The year witnessed steady progress in the Programme with total number of SHGs saving-linked with banks reaching 79.03 lakh, with a total saving amount of `13691 crore. Likewise the total number of SHGs with loan outstanding stood at 46.72 lakh with a total loan amount outstanding of `57119 crore. During 2015-16 the total No. of SHGs credit linked stood at 18.32 lakh with a total amount disbursed being `37286 crore. Signifiactly the NPA level declined by 0.59% over previous year.

1.9 Peer-to-Peer(P2P)Lending

Another far sighted step taken by RBI is with regard to Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. This is an innovative form of crowd-funding with financial returns. It involves the use of an online platform to bring lenders and borrowers together and help in mobilising unsecured finance. The borrower can either be an individual or a business requiring a loan. The platform enables a preliminary assessment of the borrower’s creditworthiness and collection of loan repayments. Accordingly, a fee is paid to the platform by both borrowers and lenders. Interest rates range from a flat interest rate fixed by the platform to dynamic interest rates as agreed upon by borrowers and lenders using a cost-plus model (operational costs plus margin for the platform and returns for lenders).

One of the main advantages of P2P lending for borrowers is that the rates are lower than those offered by money lenders/unorganised sector, while the lenders benefit from higher returns than those obtained from a savings account or from any other investment. In India, there are currently many online P2P lending platforms and the sector has been growing at a rapid pace. The Reserve Bank released a consultation paper on P2P lending in April 2016. The paper deliberated the advantages and disadvantages of regulating P2P platforms and underscored the need to develop a balanced regulatory approach that would protect lenders and borrowers without curbing the underlying innovations. Accordingly, P2P platforms are proposed to be regulated as a separate category of NBFCs. The feedback received on the paper from various stakeholders is being examined by RBI to finalise the regulatory framework.

1.10MFIsasChannelsforGovt.ProgrammesReserve Bank granted NBFC-MFIs general permission to act as channelising agents for distribution of loans under special schemes of central/state government agencies exempting such loans from the qualifying assets criteria. This would be a big boost to MFIs to take a rightful place in the implementation of credit-linked poverty alleviation programmes of central and state governments. At the same time it would give a fillip to the spread of implementation of these programmes to the difficult and remoter areas still unreached by banks.


e Core Values of Micro nance which Guide the Micro nanceInstitutions are as Follows:

A. INTEGRITYn To provide low-

income clients women, men, and their families, with access to nancial services that are client focused, designed to enhance their wellbeing, and delivered in a manner that is ethical, digni ed, transparent, equitable and cost effective.

E. PRIVACY OF CLIENT INFORMATION

n To safeguard personal information of clients, allowing disclosures and exchange of relevant information with authorized personnel only, and with the knowledge and informed consent of clients.

B. QUALITY OF SERVICE

n To ensure quality services to clients, appropriate to their needs, and delivered efficiently in a convenient and timely manner.

n To maintain high standards of professionalism based on honesty, non-discrimination and customer centricity.

F. INTEGRATING SOCIAL VALUES INTO OPERATIONS

n To ensure high standards of governance and management focused on not only nancial performance but also social impact of business.

n To monitor and report social as well as nancial data.

n To assess the social performance and social relevance of the institution from time to time.

C. TRANSPARENCYn To provide complete

and accurate information to clients regarding all products and services offered.

n To create awareness and enable clients and all other stakeholders to understand the information provided with respect to

nancial services offered and availed.

G. FEEDBACK & GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM

n To provide clients formal and informal channels for feedback and suggestions.

n To consistently assess the impact of services in order to enhance competencies and serve clients better.

n To provide a formal and easy to access grievance redress mechanism for clients.

D. FAIR PRACTICESn To ensure that clients

are protected against fraud and misrepresentation, deception or unethical practices.

n To ensure that all practices related to lending and recovery of loans are fair and maintain respect for client's dignity and with an understanding of client's vulnerable situation.

Source: Revised Code of Conduct

Box 1.1 Core Values of Microfinance

Outreach and Loan Portfolio 7

Outreach and Loan PortfolioChapter 2

Client outreach and loan portfolio are two key indicators of an MFI’s contribution to financial inclusion as well as the depth and breadth of financial deepening achieved by it. This chapter aims to provide

an overview of MFIs’ outreach in terms of client coverage and loan portfolio, based on the data received from 166 MFIs. This chapter is divided into two parts; the first part explains geographic distribution of microfinance institutions and their client outreach. The second discusses the issues of portfolio outstanding, loan disbursement, and purpose of loan.

2.1GeographicalSpreadofMicrofinance

MFIs currently operate in 29 States, 4 Union Territories and 588 districts in India. Table 2.2 shows the distribution of MFIs by state. In particular, it shows the number of MFIs operating in each state, their total number of branches in the state and the number of districts with microfinance operations. Annexure1 indicates the state wise presence of different MFIs.

Twenty five MFIs with a large outreach and portfolio have operations in more than five states, out of which five leading MFIs are operating in more than fifteen states. A total of 62 MFIs (38%) are operating in two to five states, while 79 MFIs (48%) have confined their operations to only one state. The details of States/ Union Territories wise operation of 165 MFIs are given in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: No. of MFIs in Indian States/UTs

No. of States/UTs No. of MFI

1 79

2 to 5 62

6 to 10 16

11 to 15 4

> 15 5

Total 166

MFIs with a smaller scale or regional focus have concentrated their operations in 1-2 states only whereas other MFIs have spread across a higher number of states in order to increase their size, scale and simultaneously mitigate concentration risk. MFIs operating in multiple states, in general, are typically larger in size and follow the legal form of an NBFC-MFI. The geographical expansion of bigger MFIs is illustrated by the fact that while in 2013 -14 only 15 MFIs had operations in more than 5 states, that number increased to 25 in 2015 -16. List of top 10 MFIs operating in more number of states and more number of districts are presented in Figure 2.1 and 2.2 respectively.


Figure 2.1: Top 10 MFIs Operating in Number of Indian States/Union Territories

Figure 2.2: Top 10 MFIs Operating in Number of Indian Districts

10

11

12

13

15

16

17

18

24

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Annapurna, Equitas, ESAF, NERFL, Utkarsh

NABARD Fin Services Ltd.

Spandana

AML

Basix

Satin Creditcare

SKS Microfinance Ltd

SML, Janalakshmi

Ujjivan

No. of States/UTs

102

118

130

148

174

183

199

207

305

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Basix, Sonata, Utkarsh

SVCL

AML

Equitas

Satin Credit care

Spandana

Janalakshmi

SML, Ujjivan

SKS

No. of Districts


Table 2.2: No. of MFIs in Indian States/UTs and No. of Districts with MFI Operation

Name of the States/UTs

No. of MFIs operating in the

state (including those having

Head Quarters outside)

No. of districts of

the state where

MFIs operate

No. of Branches

Andhra Pradesh 9 13 213

Arunachal Pradesh 3 5 12

Assam 21 25 320

Andaman & Nicobar 2 1 2

Bihar 34 38 856

Chandigarh 2 1 6

Chhattisgarh 22 23 312

Delhi 12 7 49

Goa 3 1 7

Gujarat 22 33 458

Haryana 16 20 165

Himachal Pradesh 5 4 7

Jammu & Kashmir 1 1 1

Jharkhand 24 24 276

Karnataka 32 30 1373

Kerala 16 13 301

Madhya Pradesh 37 48 948

Maharashtra 42 36 1029

Manipur 6 9 38

Meghalaya 7 6 20

Mizoram 5 8 31

Nagaland 3 2 3

Odisha 26 31 692

Puducherry 12 4 20

Punjab 9 21 132

Rajasthan 21 31 279

Sikkim 3 2 8

Tamil Nadu 33 34 1519

Telangana 6 9 155

Tripura 9 8 28

Uttarakhand 16 9 92

Uttar Pradesh 25 71 1291

West Bengal 45 20 1001

Total 588 11644

2.2 BranchNetworkThe MFIs in India had been consolidating their operations to cope with the effects of transition taking place in the sector. While 2012 and 2013 witnessed a decline in the branch network, the trend was arrested in 2014. In 2014 -15, MFIs have expanded their branches, posting a marginal growth of 4.57 %. In 2015 -16, total branch network of the MFIs excluding Bandhan was 11644. In 2014 -15, Bandhan alone had 2022 branches out of total branch network of 12221. Number wise branch network in 2015-16 has declined to 11644 from 12221 but actually there is a growth of 14% (factoring in Bandhan’s exit as an MFI).


The distribution of branches among different categories of MFIs as of March 2016 showed that NBFC-MFIs had the lion’s share of 9775 branches.

Figure 2.3: MFI Branch Network – Yearly Trend and Category – wise Breakup

SKS is the MFI with largest number of branches at 1191. Names of Top 10 MFIs in terms of Branch Network are given in Figure 2.4.

Figure 2.4: Top 10 MFIs in Terms of Branch Network

13562

1145910697

1168712221

11644

90350

916

9775

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

341

380

397

431

469

494

523

697

1191

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Janalakshmi , Utkarsh

AML

Equitas

Satin Creditcare

Ujjivan

Cashpor

Spandana

SML

SKS

No. of Branches


Box 2.1: Responsible Finance - An Essential Component of Microfinance Industry

The idea of Responsible Finance pivots around transparency, inclusion and customer-centricity.

Though, these principles should make their way to the charter of every financial service they are

altogether more important in Microfinance industry given that the client base is the underserved

population. Prevailing higher interest rates for the Joint Liability Group (JLG) Loans which are

offered to perhaps the most needy and vulnerable (read financially-less-aware) borrowers tend to raise

eyebrows more often than rates in other loan categories. Concern of profit earning targets of private

capital overwhelming the social objectives primarily revolves around areas like over-indebtedness,

lack of customer interest, underserved geographies and customer education, among others.

Indebtedness

The gross loan portfolio of the Microfinance JLG industry increased more than five folds to nearly

`81000 crores in 2016 from about `15000 crores in 2011. The gross loan portfolio of top 100 districts

grew by 54% between March 2015 and March 2016, a good 20 percent points higher than the national

number. Few leading players have grown their gross loan portfolios by over 80% in the 12 months of

2015-16. Such steep growth in loan portfolios without proportionate growth in borrower base indicate

towards potential case of over-indebtedness and subsequent lack of client protection. Although the

portfolio at risk (30-day) has been under 0.3%, a close monitoring of the situation is needed in 16

districts of the top 200 districts where 7% of borrowers have loans with more than 2 lenders.

To promote Responsible Finance amongst microfinance lenders, the Reserve Bank of India and the

Self-Regulatory Organizations (Sa-Dhan & MFIN) had intervened by setting up a code of conduct -

capping interest rates, defining practices to control over-lending to an individual, and laying out other

best practices. RBI and SROs have been keeping a close watch on the happenings within the industry

to make sure code of conduct guidelines are adhered to.

Credit Bureaus such as CRIF High Mark have helped lenders to comply with these guidelines,

especially with the ones related to over indebtedness. However, the distribution of loan portfolios is

changing from NBFC-MFIs to other type of institutions. Bandhan which started as a microfinance

company in 2001 has become a private bank – Bandhan Bank, and other 8 erstwhile NBFC-MFIs are

transforming themselves into Small Finance Banks (SFBs). Other private players including banks and

NBFCs, and public sector banks are also building up significant JLG portfolios, directly as well as

through business correspondent channels. However, the guidelines still refer to NBFC-MFIs, whereas

currently 40% of portfolio is not with NBFC-MFIs. Once these 8 players become SFBs, the gross loan

portfolio with NBFC-MFIs will reduce further to just about 35-40%.

The assessment of indebtedness for a microfinance borrower is incomplete without the evaluation of

borrower’s exposure to individual and SHG loans. The Reserve Bank of India has advised all banks

to capture and share borrower level data for SHG loans, this data has just started flowing into the

credit bureau database. CRIF High Mark already provides information to lenders about indebtedness

of borrower on JLG loans and Individual loans. CRIF High Mark is working with many smaller

cooperative banks and NBFCs also to include their entire data into the bureau database; this will help

in getting a more accurate picture of the borrower’s indebtedness.


The code of conduct guidelines which now are required to be followed only by NBFC-MFIs, should

be reviewed with the changing legal structures of leading microfinance lenders to at least include all

lenders practicing JLG loans irrespective of their legal organization. Should the exposure limit of Rs 1

lakh also consider individual loans and SHG loans instead of just JLG loans? A revised guideline can

support lenders to avoid over burdening of the end-borrower.

Customer-Centricity

Microfinance lenders are significantly investing in improving process efficiencies, mostly through

technology-enabled solutions. Tablet based loan origination solutions have not only helped improve

productivity for the lender, but also improved service quality for the customer by lowering turnaround

time. The field executive is now able to check credit history of a customer real-time and take a lending

decision. Decision of whether to lend and how much to lend are being automated using high end

technology thus enforcing consistency in policies for the lender and minimizing reviewer’s subjectivity

for the consumer.

The personal identity of an individual may be misused by an intermediary for personal benefits if the

individual is not aware or present for the transaction with the lender. The consumer’s interest can be

protected against such misuse by improving upon authentication and avoidance of cash transactions

between end-beneficiary and the lender.

Aadhaar which is slated to address the authentication problems especially for such segment of

customers, is now the most available identifier in the country with coverage across nearly 79 crore

adults (as of August 2016). Barring few states such as Assam and Meghalaya, other states have 90%+

adult population is covered under Aadhaar. 55% of newly disbursed loans by MFIN members in last

15 months are seeded with Aadhaar (UID). Other lenders are also increasingly preferring Aadhaar as

the proof of identity. Lenders are now testing and exploring use of Aadhaar biometric-based eKYC

service, which once implemented across the system will help address the matter of “presence” in

addition to that of “identity”.

Under the Prime Minister’s Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), 24 crore banking accounts have been opened

in last 2 years ensuring almost all households in India with banking access. This unforeseeable

penetration of banking accounts and growing availability of banking avenues even in rural areas can

enable electronic disbursements of microfinance loans only to banking account of the consumer,

thereby reducing dealing in cash through the intermediaries and thus, the possible misappropriation

of funds. The repayments of the loans could also be encouraged through digital means, to begin with

in urban areas.

MFIs (especially larger ones) have lowered interest rates over past few years. Well-performing MFIs

have been able to raise funds at lower cost. These MFIs have also been able to become more cost-

efficient over the years. These benefits seem to have been passed to the customer.


Inclusion of Deeper Geographies

It wouldn’t be totally incorrect to say that substantial part of country is now serviced by the Microfinance

industry. There are 200+ districts which have 20 or more lenders operating, 500+ districts which have

5 or more lenders operating and 40 more districts which now have more than two lenders active.

Despite such widening of coverage, 60% of JLG lending is concentrated in urban areas and 53 districts

(excluding districts of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana) are still not covered by microfinance lenders.

CRIF High Mark provides Pin Point reports generally at pin code level and occasionally at village

level to lenders to help them identify business opportunities in newer geographies, thus creating

possibilities for them to explore deeper geographies. Development Financial Institutions such as

SIDBI also use such reports to influence financing of the MFIs operating in under-penetrated areas.

Education and Support

The borrowers need to be educated on how to manage debt better. MFIs as part of their initial training

module help borrowers understand importance of better debt management. The World Bank has also

taken initiatives to create educational material for more awareness amongst borrowers. MFIs also

support customers in taking their concerns to credit bureaus in case of any potential dispute on the

credit report. We at CRIF High Mark have been investing resources to provide adequate support to

address such queries.

Collectively, MFIs, other lenders, developmental institutions, industry associations and regulators can

help make micro-lending more responsible by continuing initiatives on more inclusion, customer-

centric solutions and customer education. We as CRIF High Mark Credit Bureau are geared up to

provide the required support to keep the underserved customer at the centre and include them in the

mainstream.

Courtesy: CRIF High Mark


Client Outreach grew by 8% 2016 relative to 2015 without Bandhan which indicates a sound growth of MFIs in 2015-16. This rise in the number of borrowers is positively correlated with an increase in fund flow from banks, MUDRA and financial institutions to MFIs.

2.3.1 Regional Outreach of MFIs

1 Clients of MFIs are essentially Loan Borrowers. ‘Clients’ and ‘Borrowers’ have been interchangeably used in this report.

2.3 Client1 OutreachThe total number of clients served by MFIs stood at 399 lakh as on 31 March, 2016. Client outreach of MFIs had grown substantially from 2005 to 2011, reaching a level of 317 lakh. This trend slowed down during 2012 and 2013 and the number of clients slumped to 275 lakh. The trend reversed in 2014 with a growth and reached a level of 330 lakhs. This trend continues in 2016 with a huge rise in clients/borrowers to an all time high of 399 lakh. Majority of these clients are being served by NBFC-MFIs (84.94%), primarily the larger ones. MFIs with outstanding portfolio above `500 crore are responsible for reaching out to 85.41% of the clients in the industry.

Figure 2.5: Outreach to Borrowers: Yearly Trend and Category–wise Breakup for 2016

335

267

317

275 275

330

371399

46

1 13

339

0.1 3 8 840

341

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

No

. o

f B

orr

ow

er (

in l

akh

)

Out of the total client base of 399 lakh, Southern region alone contributes to 39% followed by 20% each in East and Central region whereas West and North have 13% and 6% of total outreach respectively. Northeast has the least client outreach numbers with 3%. Share in outreach has expanded only in case of Central, West and North regions from 15 to 20 %, 11 to 13% and 4 to 6 % respectively.

Figure 2.6: Regional break up of Client Outreach

39%

20%

20%

13%

6%

2%

South East Central West North Northeast


This year, a positive growth trend in client outreach is observed across all regions except East and Northeast. North region has grown at 62%, followed by Central and West regions at 42% and 25% respectively. The South region has maintained a moderate growth rate of 8% whereas Northeast and Eastern regions have declined by 55% and 15% respectively.

2.3.2 State-wise Client Outreach

Client outreach in various states is mapped in Table 2.3. It is observed that all States/UTs have grown, except for West Bengal, Assam, Tripura, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh (as also AP & Telengana). Exclusion of Bandhan is the reason for the fall in client outreach in some states of East and Northeast. The other reason is a deliberate scaling down of operations in both these regions by leading MFIs.

Table 2.3: Outreach (in lakh) of MFIs across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (decreasing order)

State 2016 2015 Growth (%)

Karnataka 75 62 21%

Tamil Nadu 57 46 24%

Uttar Pradesh 39 29 36%

Maharashtra 39 30 29%

Madhya Pradesh 28 21 34%

West Bengal 25 45 -45%

Bihar 24 24 0%

Odisha 24 17 38%

Gujarat 13 11 15%

Kerala 12 7 75%

Chhattisgarh 8 4 109%

Rajasthan 8 7 17%

Andhra Pradesh 7 -65%*

Assam 7 15 -54%

Jharkhand 7 5 35%

Punjab 6 3 109%

Haryana 6 3 99%

Uttarakhand 3 3 7%

Telangana 3 -65%*

Delhi 3 2 26%

Pondicherry 1 0.83 52%

Tripura 1 3 -66%

Manipur 0.88 0.74 19%

Mizoram 0.65 0.63 3%

Himachal Pradesh 0.49 0.06 717%

Sikkim 0.28 0.20 41%

Meghalaya 0.19 0.37 -49%

Arunachal Pradesh 0.17 0.18 -5%

Goa 0.13 0.10 33%

Chandigarh 0.13 0.06 111%

Nagaland 0.04 0.03 36%

Jammu & Kashmir 0.02 0.01 124%

Andaman 0.01 0.01 10%

Total 399 371

* Combined growth of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana on the basis of combined data for 2015-16.


2.3.3 Rural – Urban Share of MFIs Borrowers

2014-15 can described as watershed year as far as the rural-urban divide in Indian microfinance is concerned. Hitherto Indian microfinance was touted as basically a rural phenomenon as compared to microfinance in Latin America as also in large parts of Africa and Asia. But that statement is no longer valid. A very interesting trend is seen in the rural-urban focus of MFIs. The share of rural clientele which was 69 % in 2012 decreased to 56 % in 2014 and has drastically come down to 33 %. The proportion of rural to urban clients for the year 2014-15 is 33% to 67%. In the year 2015-16, there is a slight improvement in the share of rural clientele which increased to 38% because of exclusion of Bandhan. One of the key findings from our research shows that the business models of MFIs are becoming urban centric in order to minimize operational expenses and maximize their operational efficiency so that regulation on margin cap is complied and a reasonable profitability is maintained.

Figure 2.7: Trends in Rural - Urban Share of MFI Borrowers

2.3.4 Outreach to Special Segment of Borrowers (Women, SC/ST, and Minorities)

Worldover the focus of microfinance has always been on serving women. In India as an alternate vehicle of credit, microfinance serves a large segment of people from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Minorities. Women clients constitute 97% of the total clients of MFIs. Similarly, SC/ST borrowers also constitute a substantial chunk (27%) of the clients. A trend analysis of women borrowers, SC/ST borrowers and minority borrowers is shown in numbers using a table. From the Table 2.4 below, it is observed that women borrowers, SC/ST borrowers and Minority borrowers have been consistently increasing for last four years.

For the first time, in 2014 -15, data for differently abled borrowers and borrowers having Aadhaar Cards has been collected. Coverage of MFIs in these two parameters is not satisfactory. Differently abled borrowers and borrowers with Aadhaar constitute only 0.05% and 10% of the total respectively. The reason for a low coverage under these heads is the non-collection of such data at MFI level.

In addition to differently abled borrowers and borrowers having Aadhaar Card, data on Clients’ Compliants received and resolved by the MFIs was also collected in 2014-15 with moderate response. The analysis reveals that 97% of the complaints are resolved by the MFIs.

69% 67%

56%

33%38%

31% 33%

44%

67%62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Ru

ral-

Urb

an B

orr

ow

ers

(%)

Rural Urban


Focusing on microfinance services towards women, SC/ST and minorities, MFIs are contributing significantly to the wellbeing of the underprivileged, leading to a rise in their welfare and assisting with the financial inclusion agenda.

Table 2.4: Composition of Borrowers – Category wise

% to Total Borrowers

YearWomen

Borrowers

SC/ST Borrowers

Minority Borrowers

Differently abled

Borrowers

Borrowers having Aadhaar

Card

BC Borrowers

Individual Borrowers

2011 94%

2012 95% 20% 23%

2013 96% 21% 23%

2014 97% 19% 14%

2015 97% 28% 18% 0.05% 10%

2016 97% 30% 27% 4% 18% 15% 3%

Note: Data for SC/ST and Minorities is being collected from 2012; data for Differently abled borrowers and Borrowers having Aadhaar Card is being collected from 2015, whereas data for BC Borrowers and Individual Borrowers started from 2016.

2.3.5 Leading MFIs in Client Outreach

It is evident that large NBFC-MFIs have a larger client outreach in contrast to other legal forms of MFIs. Among these, SKS Microfinance Ltd has the largest client outreach i.e. approximately 12% of the total client outreach of the sector. Janalakshmi, SKDRDP, Ujjivan are the other major players in this area.

Figure 2.8: List of Top 10 MFIs with Client Outreach as of March 2016

10.68

12.06

13.28

18.51

20.57

27.44

30.50

36.34

46.23

46.37

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00

Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Ltd.

Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

Share Microfin Ltd.

Satin Creditcare Network Ltd.

Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd.

Equitas Micro Finance Ltd.

Ujjivan Financial Services Ltd.

SKDRDP

Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd.,

SKS Microfinance Ltd

Client Outreach (in lakh)


Over the years, the entries in the Top 10 MFIs in terms of outreach have remained more or less unchanged. This year the only new entrant to top ten is Grama Vidiyal Microfinance Ltd which came in place of Bandhan. Interestingly, SKDRDP and CASHPOR remain the only non-NBFC MFIs with a large client outreach. Other than legal form, factors like availability of funds, business plan, regulatory environment etc also determine the scale of operation and client outreach. Among the top ten, it is observed that three MFIs have grown between 54% to 190%. The growth rates of some of these institutions have raised concerns among sector experts.

2 Source: CRIF Highmark

ActiveMicro-lenders2

2.4LoanPortfolioofMFIsAs per the NSS data of various years, including the latest one of 2013, majority of the population is still dependent largely on informal and expensive sources, including money lenders to meet their credit needs. Credit needs for such a population range from emergency loans, consumption loans, business loans, working capital loans, housing etc. Credit is the flagship service offered by MFIs to clients outside the net of formal financial services. For MFIs, loan portfolio is the primary revenue generating asset. It also gives details about the health of MFIs through financial performance, as the financial performance is a function of revenue and


cost. Loan portfolio of the MFIs and its trends are analyzed below to understand the performance of the institutions and their contribution to the goal of financial inclusion.

As of March 2016, the total loan portfolio of MFIs has reached an all time high of over ̀ 63,853 which is a 31% growth over last year that also includes a managed portfolio of nearly ̀ 16914 crore. Total managed portfolio

Table 2.5: List of Top MFIs with Loan Portfolio as of March 2016

S. No

Name of MFIGross Loan

Portfolio(` in crore)

1 Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd. 10983

2 SKS Microfinance Ltd. 7682

3 Ujjivan Financial Services Ltd. 5389

4 SKDRDP 4994

5 Equitas Micro Finance Ltd. 3283

6 Satin Creditcare Network Ltd. 3271

7Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

2539

8 Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd. 2282

9ESAF Microfinance & Investments Pvt. Ltd.

1925

10 Share Microfin Ltd. 1540

Top ten contribute to `43887 crores of loan portfolio which is 69% of the sector’s total.

Figure 2.9: Gross Loan Portfolio – Yearly Trend and Category–wise Breakup of 2016

also includes a BC portfolio of `7984 crore which is 13% of total loan portfolio. The net loan portfolio or owned portfolio on the books of the MFIs stood at `46939 crore, which is an increase of 20% over the last year.

The share of NBFC-MFIs stood over 88%, followed by Societies and Trusts at 9%. Nearly 88% of the portfolio is held by MFIs with a portfolio size above `500 crore.

List of top 10 MFIs in terms of loan portfolio is indicated in Table 2.5. In this list ESAF Microfinance is the new entrant in place of Bandhan. Among the top 10, six MFIs have posted a growth between 53% to 191 % in loan portfolio. These growth rates have given rise to some concerns among the well-wishers of the sector.

24332 24607 25699

33517

48882

63853

5944

131 1556

56223

4 237 792 1088

5786

55947

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

Gro

ss L

oan

Po

rtfo

lio

(`

in c

rore

)


2.4.1 Rural – Urban Share of Gross Loan Portfolio

Figure 2.10: Percentage of Rural - Urban Share of Gross Loan Portfolio

Figure 2.10 indicates that the Gross Loan Portfolio in Urban areas is `45685 crore which constitute 72% whereas the share of Rural areas is `18167 crore which constitutes 28%. Even in 2015, share of Urban and Rural portfolio was the same.

2.4.2 Regional Spread of Loan Portfolio

Among the regions, South still dominates the overall loan portfolio outstanding of MFIs with 40% followed by Central with 19%. East and West have a share of 18% and 14% respectively. While North and Northeast have least portfolio share of 7% and 2% respectively.

Figure 2.11: Region wise Loan Portfolio

All regions have experienced an upward trend in loan portfolio outstanding except East and Northeast. Exclusion of Bandhan influenced East and Northeast regions towards downward trend. Highest growth is visible in North with 75% followed by Central and West with 70% and 64% respectively while South has grown at 34%.

40%

18%

19%

14%

7%

2%


28%

72%

28%

72%

Rural Urban

2015

2016


2.4.3 Loan Portfolio Across States

State-wise loan portfolio outstanding as shown in Table 2.6, indicates that States like, Himachal Pradesh, Pondicherry, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, Chandigarh and Haryana have substantially increased their portfolio size during 2015 -16 compared to the previous year. In West Bengal, Assam, Manipur, Tripura Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh the portfolio have shrunk as Bandhan became bank and not part of MF sector.

Table 2.6: Loan Portfolio Outstanding Across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (Deceasing Order)

States/UTs 2016 2015 Growth (%)

Karnataka 12645 8127 56%

Tamil Nadu 9039 6091 48%




Bihar 3526 3076 15%

West Bengal 3406 6087 -44%

Odisha 3339 1985 68%

Kerala 2372 1222 94%

Gujarat 2193 1355 62%

Rajasthan 1368 958 43%

Haryana 1186 446 166%


Punjab 1116 471 137%

Assam 1013 2285 -56%

Jharkhand 977 643 52%


Uttarakhand 577 381 51%

Delhi 559 422 33%

Telangana 393 -61%*

Puducherry 201 97 108%

Mizoram 170 169 1%

Manipur 134 158 -15%

Tripura 70 505 -86%

Arunachal Pradesh 49 51 -3%

Sikkim 34 26 31%

Meghalaya 29 57 -49%

Chandigarh 25 8 211%

Goa 23 16 45%

Himachal Pradesh 23 8 186%

Jammu & Kashmir 4 3 21%

Nagaland 4 3 19%

Andaman 1 0.59 0.06%

Total 63853 48882



2.4.4 Managed Portfolio

MFIs have become increasingly prudent in using financial innovations to enhance their income and reduce risk. Securitization model was devised for the purpose of overcoming capital constraints. Under the guidelines of RBI, MFIs are required to maintain capital to the extent of at least 15% of their risk-weighted assets. In order to avoid further capital requirements on the mounting loan assets, they tend to sell a part of the portfolio to Banks/FIs. They, however, continue to manage them, on behalf of the purchasing bank/FI and get fee income from these banks. On the other hand, the model of securitization has helped banks to meet Priority Sector lending targets as these loans on the books of the banks would qualify under 18 % requirement of agriculture credit. Many MFIs have been taking recourse to the BC route to increase their outreach without straining their balance sheets.

Indian MFIs have collectively managed a portfolio worth of nearly `16914 crore as of March 2016. This represents a growth of nearly 72 % over previous year, indicating an increasing preference of MFIs for

District wise Penetration of Portfolio Outstanding of MFIs3

3 Source: CRIF Highmark


2.4.5 Business Correspondent (BC) Portfolio

Business Correspondents (BC) manage and service the loan portfolio on behalf of banks. Earlier only NGO-MFIs were allowed to be BCs but now NBFC-MFIs are also allowed by RBI to act as BCs. As a result more and more MFIs are coming forward to be BCs of banks. So Sa-Dhan felt the necessity of capturing BC portfolio separately and started data collection from the financial year 2015-16 onwards. BC Portfolio constitutes 13% of total portfolio and 47% of managed portfolio. The distribution of the BC portfolio among different categories of MFIs is displayed in the Figure 2.13.

Figure 2.13: BC Loan Portfolio and Category–wise Breakup for 2015-16

this route. Total managed portfolio also includes a BC portfolio of `7984 crore which is 13% of total loan portfolio. The distribution of the portfolio among different categories of MFIs is also displayed in the Figure 2.12.

Figure 2.12: Managed Loan Portfolio – Yearly Trend and Category–wise Breakup for 2015-16

7984

4741

0762

2480

0 14 207 321 550

6891

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

BC

Po

rtfo

lio

(`

in c

rore

)

27763694 3361

4075

9854

16914

4904

2765

11243

0 17 207 3371181

15171

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

Man

aged

Po

rtfo

lio

(`

in c

rore

)


2.4.6 Loan Outstanding per Borrower

Average loan outstanding per borrower has been an important criterion to understand the general profile of clients borrowing from MFIs (a surrogate indicator for depth of outreach). It has implications on operating cost as well as the adequacy of loan amount for the purpose it was borrowed.

Average loan for the year stood at nearly `11425 which is a big fall of 13% over the previous year. Average loan size in North is reported close to `15717 followed by South at `14124. It appears that loan size is marginally larger in North as the economic activities in this region require higher outlays due to higher cost of living.

Figure 2.14: Loan Outstanding per Borrower yearly trend and across regions for the FY 2015-16

2.4.7 Trends in Outreach and Outstanding Portfolio

Growth in outreach and loan portfolio has fluctuated year on year and reached its lowest level in 2012, owing to AP crisis and consequent drop in commercial funding to MFIs. In 2013, however, the reverse trend started and continued in 2015 thanks to resumption of bank funding to MFIs. This upward growth is broken again in 2015 because of Bandhan becoming a bank and exiting the MFI sector.

Figure 2.15: Growth Fluctuations in outreach and Loan Outstanding over the Years

7481 7725 8112

10079

13162

11425

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Ave

rag

e lo

an p

er b

orr

ow

er (

`)

14124

8762

10992

13667

15717

10322

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

Ave

rag

e lo

an p

er b

orr

ow

er (

`)

41

61

18 19

-15

3

20

138

72

97

56

18

-37

30 33 31

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Growth in Client Outreach (%)over previous year Growth in Loan Portfolio (%) over previous year


4No of MFIs reported in 2010 - 11 was much higher than other years (184 MFIs)

2.5 LoanDisbursementLoan disbursement is a factor of funds received by the MFIs from lenders, primarily the commercial banks. Loan disbursement in during 2010-11 was higher4 on account of large size sanctions made by the banks to the MFIs before the crisis hit in Andhra Pradesh. Subsequent years witnessed a sharp fall in disbursement as fund flow to the sector was severely constrained. Disbursement by MFIs in recent years indicates a positive trend since 2012-13. Loan disbursement increased by `15485 crore to `72345 crore during 2015-16 over the previous year accounting for a 27% increase.

List of Top 10 MFIs disbursing loan during 2015-16 is given in Figure 2.17

Figure 2.16: Loan Disbursement over the years

1713

2388

2402

3171

3349

6606

4889

6619

11537

12082

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Utkarsh Microfinance Pvt Ltd

ESAF Microfinance & Investments Pvt Ltd

Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Ltd.

Equitas Microfinance Private Limited

Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt Ltd

Satin Creditcare Network Ltd.

SKDRDP

Ujjivan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd.

SKS Microfinance Limited

Loan Disbursed (` in crore)

Figure 2.17: Top 10 MFIs disbursing Loan during 2015-16

2933035176

2263525796

38558

56860

72345

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Lo

an D

isb

urs

ed (

`in

cro

re)


2.5.1 Loan Disbursement- States/UTs and Regional Pattern

State-wise Disbursement as shown in Table 2.7, indicates that States like, Himachal Pradesh, Pondicherry, Punjab, Haryana and Kerala have substantially increased their disbursement during 2015-16 compared to the previous year. In West Bengal, Assam, Bihar, Tripura, Manipur, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Goa and Andaman the disbursement have shrunk as Bandhan became bank and not part of MF sector.

Table 2.7: Loan Disbursement across States/UTs – 2015 & 2016 (decreasing order)

State 2016 2015 Growth (%)

Karnataka 13857 9284 49%

Tamil Nadu 10522 6943 52%



West Bengal 4623 9449 -51%


Bihar 4496 4675 -4%

Odisha 3834 2869 34%

Kerala 3010 1467 105%

Gujarat 2334 1620 44%

Rajasthan 1574 1299 21%

Punjab 1372 625 120%

Haryana 1355 592 129%

Jharkhand 1182 941 26%

Assam 1129 3044 -63%


Uttarakhand 667 511 31%

Delhi 600 541 11%

Puducherry 273 127 115%


Himachal Pradesh 117 10 1075%

Tripura 91 757 -88%

Manipur 79 122 -35%

Telangana 64 -20%*

Sikkim 60 36 68%

Meghalaya 30 73 -59%

Mizoram 18 97 -82%

Chandigarh 16 10 60%

Goa 12 18 -32%

Arunachal Pradesh 8 27 -70%

Nagaland 4 4 1%

Jammu & Kashmir 4 3 33%

Andaman 1 1 -43%

Total 72345



Table 2.7 depicts that Karnataka disbursed `13857 crore during FY 2015-16, holding top position in terms of loan amount disbursed. Tamil Nadu occupied second position with `10522 crore disbursement, followed by Uttar Pradesh with ̀ 7791 crore and Maharashtra with ̀ 7435. Year 2015-16 has experienced a remarkable growth in MFI loan disbursement in South, Central, West and North regions.

Figure 2.18: Regional Pattern of Loan Disbursement

2.5.2 Rural – Urban Share of No. of Loans Disbursed

In 2015-16, 1957 lakh loans had been disbursed in Rural areas which constitute 26% of total, whereas 5668 lakh loans had been disbursed in Urban areas which constitutes 74%. Figure 2.19 depicts that number of loans in Urban areas had increased and number of loans in Rural areas had decreased over 2015 to 2016.

Figure 2.19: Percentage of Rural - Urban Share of No. of Loan Disbursed

39%

20%

19%

13%

7%

2%


32%

68%

29%

71%

Rural Urban

2015

2016


2.5.3 Loan Amount Disbursed

In 2016, total loan amount disbursed increased by `13433 crore over 2015, there is a growth of 27% where amount increased in rural areas by 14% and in urban areas by 27%.

Table 2.8: Amount disbursed during the year 2015 and 2016

Loan disbursed in 2016 ( ` in crore)

Loan disbursed in 2015 ( ` in crore)

Amount of disbursement increase

in 2016 over 2015Growth (%)

Rural 20893 18291 2602 14%

Urban 51452 40621 10831 27%

Total 72345 58912 13433 23%

2.5.4 Purpose of Loan

Traditionally, MFIs have been lending for both consumption and productive purposes. It is believed that poor people use their loans for their emergency and consumption needs more than for livelihoods. In 2011, RBI regulation stipulated that a minimum of 70% of the MFI loans are to be deployed for income generating activities. Analysis of the loan portfolio held by reporting MFIs for 2014-15 and 2015-16 shows that the proportion of income generation loan to non income generation loan is 94:06. Loan usage under different sub sectors is presented in Figure 2.20 for both income generation and non income generation loans. Agriculture, animal husbandry and trading are major sub-sectors where income generation loans are deployed. Non income generation loans are used for consumption, housing, education, water & sanitation, health etc.

Figure 2.20: Share of Income Generation Loans and non Income Generation Loans

91%

80% 80%

94%

9%

20% 20%

6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2013 2014 2015 2016

Income Generation Loans Non-income Generation Loans


2.5.4.1 Income Generation Loans

Figure 2.21: Share of MFIs Income Generation Loans under Different Sub-sectors as of March 2016

Purpose of MFIs’ loans has assumed significant importance after the RBI regulation which stipulates that aggregate amount of loans, given for income generation, should not be less than 50 per cent of the total loans given by the MFIs. An analysis of the loan portfolio held by reporting MFIs under different sub-sectors is portrayed in Figure 2.21.

2.5.4.2 Non-Income Generation Loans

Figure 2.22: Share of MFIs Non-Income Generation Loans under Different Sub-sectors as of March 2016

The Figure 2.22 confirms that among the non-income generation loans, consumption loans are predominent with 61%. Housing stands second which is very encouraging.

15%

39%29%

1%1%3%

16%Agriculture

Animal Husbandry

Trading/Small business

Transport

Cottage

Handicraft

Any Other

Income Generation Loans

12%

18%

1%

7%61%

1%

Education

Housing

Health /Medical

Water & Sanitation

Consumption

Any Other

Non-income Generation Loans


StatewiseAverageLoanPortfolioperClient

Workforce, Productivity and Portfolio Quality 31

3.1.1 Workforce in MFIs

Microfinance services, by nature, have a close human touch with clients on the ground. Even with the advent of technology, these services still predominantly depend on human resources for ensuing

effective delivery. Considering the fact that personnel costs contribute substantially to the total expenses of MFIs (i.e.24% as given in section 3.2 of this report), staff productivity plays a major role in determining their cost efficiency. Staff productivity is measured through some key indicators such as active borrowers per credit officer (ABCO), active borrowers per MFI staff, amount of loan outstanding per credit officer etc.

The MFI sector had brought down its workforce significantly from over one lakh in 2011 to just over 75000 in 2013. Thanks to an increased fund flow to the sector, MFIs increased their workforce to 103415 in 2016 in order to support their enhanced activity. The following figure illustrates the trend and furthermore shows that NBFC–MFIs and large MFIs have major share of employees (Figure 3.1.1).

Figure 3.1.1: No. of MFI Staff - Yearly Trend and MFI-Category-wise Break-up

Workforce, Productivity and Portfolio QualityChapter 3Section-I

Sixty two per cent (62%) of total staff is field staff, working in the branches of MFIs. This is obviously because of the labour- intensive nature of the MFI- operation, which involves human interaction with clients, cash handling etc. Female staff comprises of approximately 15% of the total workforce of MFIs. In FY 2015-16, female staff reduced to 15% from 16% in 2015 otherwise this proportion has been increasing over the years till 2014.

Figure 3.1.2: MFI Field Staff vs Other Staff Distribution – 2015 & 2016

114659

8695675670

8014994773

103415

11172544 5314

86385

106 1882 3726 336913593

80739

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

No

. o

f S

taff

64%

36%

62%

38%Field Staff

Other Staff2015

2016


In 2015 -16, ratio of Field Staff to Other Staff reduced over previous year. In 2014-15, share of Field staff to Total staff was 64% which reduced to 62% in 2015-16 indicating that either efficiency of the field staff has improved to handle more clients or more workload/ targets are being set for the field staff.

Table 3.1.1: Yearly trend of Total Staff vs Women Staff

YearTotal

Staff

Women

Staff

% of Women staff

to Total Staff

2011 114659 9265 8%

2012 86956 10435 12%

2013 75670 12283 16%

2014 80149 15279 19%

2015 94773 15027 16%

2016 103415 15724 15%

Figure 3.1.3: New Staff Recruited by the MFIsover the years

51051

12975 15295 16114

31157

39627

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

No

. o

f S

taff

rec

ruit

edThe number of new staff recruited came down heavily in 2012 after that again it is increasing steadily. Break-up of figures of new staff further indicate that major part of new staff were hired by for-profit MFIs. The disturbing trend is the level of staff turn-over (Table 3.1.2). Exit of staff from the sector and induction of new staff escalate the operating costs for training and orienting new staff frequently.

Table 3.1.2: Staff Turn-over among MFIs during 2015-16

No. of new Staff Recruited 39627

No. of Staff Left MFIs 23098

Net Gain 16529

Of the Total recruited, % recruited by NBFC-MFIs 88%

Of the Total recruited, % recruited by NGO-MFIs 12%

Of the Total staff left, % left from NBFC-MFIs 88%

Of the Total staff left, % left from NGO-MFIs 12%

3.1.2 Staff Productivity

Active Borrowers per Credit Officer (ABCO) and No of Borrowers per Staff

ABCO measures the number of active borrowers served by a Credit Officer (CO). The ratio is an effective way to measure the productivity. The number is significant as it determines the quantity and quality of time spent by the credit officer with a borrower, affecting his/her service quality. With very low ratio of ABCO, better service is possible, but it involves a higher cost to MFIs. Similarly, a very high ABCO ratio would affect the service quality.

Diversity in the microfinance industry is also reflected in staff productivity levels among different MFIs. Figure 3.1.4 depicts the staff productivity ratios measured through active borrowers per staff member and ABCO. We can find that about 11% of MFIs have less than 100 borrowers per staff member, 30% have 100-200 borrowers per staff, 27% have 200-300 borrowers per staff and 32% have more than 300 borrowers per staff. Similarly for ABCO, 29 % of MFIs have ABCO less than 300 while 30% fall between 300 to 500 and 41% have ABCO above 500. Among the 165, 14 MFIs are having ABCO above 1000 which indicating unrealistic targets being set for credit staff.

Workforce, Productivity and Portfolio Quality 33

Figure 3.1.4: Distribution of MFIs based on Clients Served per Staff & Credit Officer

The Median ABCO for 2016 stands at 440 as against 510 in 2012-13 ABCO has remained high for Cooperatives (508) followed by NBFC-MFIs (506). Section 8 Companies typically have lesser ABCO of 371, as most of these organisations follow the philosophy of providing financial services along with some development activities. ABCO seems to be increasing with the scale of operations. MFIs with larger scale of operations have systems and processes in place that require minimal time for credit officers to be spent at the client level.

Figure 3.1.5: ABCO Across MFIs

Distribution of MFIs Based on Loan Portfolio per Credit Officer

In additon to the number of clients reached by credit officers, the amount of loan handled by them is also an important measure that contributes to staff productivity. Figure 3.1.6 presents the distribution of MFIs across various bands of loan portfolio handled by each credit officer. Approx. 16% of MFIs have credit officers handling a loan portfolio of less than `20 lakh, while 31% of MFIs have a range of `20-40 lakh loan portfolio per credit officer. About 46% of MFIs in our sample have loan officers handling a portfolio worth more than `50 lakh.

<100

11%

100 -<200

30%

200 -<300

27%

300 -<400

20%

400 -<500

5%

> 500

7%

Client/Staff<100

4%100 -<200

8%

200 -<300

17%

300 -<400

12%400 -<500

18%

> 500

41%

Client/Credit Officer

440386

508

371

506

165

330

430 409

518

665

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700


1 PAR indicates the proportion of outstanding amount of all loan accounts having past due/arrears to the total loan portfolio. In general, PAR 30, that is, the portfolio / part of the portfolio remaining unpaid 30 days and beyond crossing the due date, would be used as a measure to assess the portfolio quality.

3. 1. 3 Portfolio Quality

The loan portfolio is the primary income-generating asset in an MFI’s balance sheet. Interest income typically constitutes over 90% of the total income of MFIs. Lending, obviously, is fraught with the inherent risk of repayment default. Therefore, maintaining a healthy loan portfolio with minimum loan default ensures the profitability and financial health of an MFI. This section presents the analysis of current performance of the loan portfolio quality as measured through Portfolio at Risk1 (PAR 30 Days)

The portfolio quality of Indian MFIs is by and large healthy if we exclude the CDR (Corporate Debt Restructuring) MFIs’ figures based in Andhra Pradesh. The overall PAR for the MFI sector has been coming down since 2012, but has shown an increase in 2014-15 and 2015-16, adding to the concerns of the sector observers.

Figure 3.1.7: MFI Loan Portfolio at Risk (PAR) Figure 3.1.8: Distribution of MFIs Based on PAR

Figure 3.1.6: Distribution of MFIs Based on Loan Portfolio per Credit Officer

Distribution of MFIs as per various levels of PAR shows (Figure 3.1.8) that over 80% of MFIs have PAR <1 for 30 days and only about 6% of MFIs have a PAR of more than 5%. Approx 13% of MFIs have PAR in the range of 1-3%.

Another important indicator of portfolio quality is overdue installments beyond 180 days. The pending installment amount is `1319 crore as of March 2016, which is lower compared to March 2015 (`2860 crore). The significance of this amount is that the MFIs concerned ought to make 100 % provision in the balance sheet as per RBI prudential norms.

< `10 lakhs

7% `10 - < `20

lakhs

9%

`20 - < `30

lakhs

13%

`30 - < `40

lakhs

18%`40 - < `50

lakhs

7%

> `50 lakhs

46%

1

0.4

0.020.13

0.29

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

<1 PAR

81%

1 -<3

PAR

11%

3 -<5

PAR

2%

>5 PAR

6%

Cost and Revenue 35

Cost and RevenueChapter 3Section-II

This section of the report covers the analysis of income and expenditure patterns of the microfinance sector and the sustainability of the sector through its profitability and self sufficiency. This section hence

contains the analysis of operational and financial expenses, revenues/income, margin, surplus, operational self sufficiency and return on assets and return on equity.

3.2.1 Expenditure Analysis

During the year 2015-16, `8119 crores were reported as the total expenses on microfinance operations of the MFIs that provided data for the report. The above expenses comprise of operating expenses (personnel expenses + administrative expenses + loan loss provisions) and finance expenses (mainly interest on borrowings). This year’s total expenses were approximately `1175 crores higher than last year on account of increase in microfinance operations. Loan Loss Provision (LLP) expenses have increased significantly from the previous years. In 2016, LLP to Operating Expenses is 9% whereas it was only 3% in 2015. This marks a deterioration in the overall quality of the outstanding portfolio of the sector.

As seen in Figure 3.2.1, the total expenses incurred are distributed at 53% in finance expenses and 47% in operating expenses. The operating expenses of 47% comprised of 24% personnel expenses and 23% other administrative expenses. Loan Loss Provisions for the year are 9% of operating expenses and 4% of total expenses have been incurred as a part of other administrative expenses.

Figure 3.2.1: Break up of Expenses by Indian MFIs

Since MFIs with an outstanding portfolio over `50 crores account for 98% of the total portfolio of the sector, it is understandable that they incur a major chunk of the expenditure too i.e. 98% of total financial expenses and 98% of total personnel expenses. This leaves the MFIs with portfolio less than `50 crores with financial expenses less than 2% and personnel expenses less than 2% of the overall expenses of the sector. This proportion of expenses is consistent with the outstanding portfolio of the MFIs.

53%

24%

23%

Financial Expenses

Personnel Expenses

Other Admn. Expenses


Figure 3.2.2: Break up of Expenses by Indian MFIs based on Portfolio size

Operating Expense Ratio1 (OER)

As seen above, operating expenses of MFIs form 47% of its total expenses. As can be seen from Figure 3.2.2 above, personnel costs make a significant contribution to the high operating costs of an MFI with about a quarter to one-third of their total expenses, except for MFIs with outstanding portfolio over `500 crores, where personnel expenses come down marginally to 24% of their total expenses.

The median operating expenses of the microfinance sector in 2016 is 10.2%. As can be seen in Figure 3.2.3, OER is lowest for NBFC-MFIs at 8.5%, followed by Section 8 Companies at 9.3 significantly lower than the OER of Society/Trust MFIs at 13.6%. Median OER for cooperatives stands even higher at 14.4%. In addition to the legal form, Figure 3.2.3 also shows that there is a direct correlation between OER and portfolio size. While the median OER is only 7.5% for MFIs with portfolio size of over `500 crores, it is at a high of 15.3% for MFIs with portfolio size of less than `1 crore.

Figure 3.2.3: Operating Expenditure Ratio Across MFIs

1 Denotes ratio of all administrative and salary expenses to average loan portfolio.

31%45% 42%

50% 52% 54%

34%

23% 28%25% 26% 24%

35% 32% 31% 26% 22% 23%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

< 1 crore 1-10 crore 10-50 crore 50-100 crore 100-500 crore >500 crore

Other Admn. Expenses

Personnel Expenses

Financial Expenses

10.2

13.614.4

9.38.5

15.3 14.6

10.39.3 9.3

7.5

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

Per

Cen

t

Cost and Revenue 37

Finance Cost Ratio2 (FCR)

As can be seen from Figure 3.2.4, NBFC-MFIs have the highest FCR among all legal forms of MFIs. Since bank loans are the major source of funds for MFIs and the rates are largely similar or within a range, FCR for most legal forms, especially those dependent mainly on bank loans, are almost similar with FCR for not for profit MFIs marginally lower than that of NBFC-MFIs. This is primarily because not for profit MFIs may have access to grants, revolving funds and subsidised loans from government sources. In case of cooperatives that mobilise deposits from its members at much lower rates, their FCR is significantly lower among all legal forms at 9.5%.

In the case of FCR and portfolio size, except for MFIs with outstanding portfolio of less than `1 crore, there is a more or less same FCR for all sizes of MFIs. This is due to the fact that smaller MFIs but with portfolio size higher than `1 crore have more access to low cost funds from NABARD, SIDBI, MUDRA, Ananya etc. compared to larger MFIs. However, this trend does not hold true for MFIs with portfolio size of less than `1 crore which have a median FCR of a significantly high 15.9%. The primary reason for this maybe that this segment of MFIs find it the most difficult to raise funds from banks and FIs due to the higher risk perception and hence end up mobilising funds at higher rates.

Figure 3.2.4: Finance Cost Ratio across MFI Categories

Trends of OER and FCR

OER of MFIs in 2015-16 has shown a sharp fall over the last year. In fact, while the OER had been consistently increasing for the last 3 years from 11.88% in 2011-12, to 12% in 2012-13 and 12.08% in 2013-14, OER has not only come down to 10.2% in 2015-16, it is also the lowest in the last 5 years.

FCR has been however growing consistently for the last 4 years from 11.89% in 2012-13, 12.17% in 2013-14 to 12.42% in 2014-15 and to 13.30% in 2015-16.

2 Denotes ratio of financial expenses paid to banks/FIs on average borrowing outstanding.

12.7

9.5

12.713.5

15.9

12.8 12.8 12.213.5

12.4

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

Per

Cen

t


Figure 3.2.5: Trends of OER and FCR

3.2.2 Income Analysis:

The total income earned by MFIs for the year 2015-16 is approximately `10329 crores, up from `8499 crores in 2014-15, a rise of nearly 22%. The median income of all legal forms of MFIs has shown an increase over the last year.

Figure 3.2.6 shows the break-up of income sources of MFIs, with 78% coming from interest on loan portfolio. The rest of the income comes from processing fees, investment income and income from sale of portfolio, other fees and commission income and other income.

Figure 3.2.6: Break-up of Income

Yield on Loan Portfolio (Financial Revenue Ratio)

While an analysis of yield on loan portfolio tells us about the pattern of income of MFIs, it is also very useful to study the yield as one of the results of portfolio quality and to understand the margin by comparing it to the costs.

Since the AP microfinance crisis, the portfolio quality of MFIs has been improving, reflecting in an increasing trend in yield on portfolio, however the yield came down in 2015-16 (Figure 3.2.7).

11.88 12.00 12.08

11.45

10.2

9

9.5

10

10.5

11

11.5

12

12.5

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

12.0011.89

12.17

12.42

13.3

11.00

11.50

12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

78%

2%

4%

6%

5%5%

Interest Income on Loan portfolio

Interest Income from Investment

Income from Portfolio sale & securitision

Income from Processing fees

Other Fees & Commission income

Other Income

Cost and Revenue 39

Figure 3.2.7: Yield Trend of MFIs

Figure 3.2.8 shows that MFIs in all legal forms have a yield within the range of 20% to 24%. Among them Society/Trust have least yield at 20%, followed by NBFC-MFIs at 21% whereas both Cooperatives and Section 8 Companies have yield of 24%. But portfolio size has a very major bearing on the yield on portfolio. Yield is decreasing with the increase of portfolio size. Yield is lower at 19% for the bigger MFIs with the portfolio of above `500 crore whereas yield is marginally higher at 26% for the smallest MFIs with the portfolio of less than `1 crore.

Figure 3.2.8: Yield on Portfolio Across MFIs

17

22

24 24

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Per

Cen

t

2120

24 24

21

26

23 23

20 19 19

0

5

10

15

20

25

30


3.2.3 Margin3

MFIs, NBFC-MFIs in particular, need to comply with RBI norms on revenue margins for MFIs, which need to be maintained under 12% and 10%. As per the data reported by the MFIs for the study, MFIs have been compliant to this regulation with margins for all the legal forms of MFIs within 9-10% with NBFC-MFIs having a median margin of 10.07%, comfortably below the limit prescribed by RBI.

3.2.4 Yield, Cost and Margin: Performance Across MFI size

Taking the yield, cost and margin together and analysing them based on portfolio size of MFIs, it may be observed that largely, margins in MFIs with smaller portfolio sizes are higher than the MFIs with higher portfolio sizes.

As can be seen from Figure 3.2.9, MFIs with portfolio between `50-100 crores have the lowest financial cost and the second lowest yield on portfolio, but the highest margin while the MFIs with portfolio less than `1 crore have the highest financial cost and the second highest yield, as well as a high margin. The lowest margin is for those MFIs that have a portfolio above `500 crores, as their financial costs are moderate and yield is relatively lower.

Figure 3.2.9: Yield, Cost and Margin of MFIs –size wise

3 Margin is the difference between MFIs’ financial revenue (excluding processing fee) % age on average loan portfolio and the financial cost % age on average outstanding borrowing from different sources.

26.0

23.0 23.0

19.7 19.4 18.9

15.9

12.8 12.8 12.213.5

12.4

11.7 12.111.1

10.1 9.4 9.4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

< 1 crore 1-10 crore 10-50 crore 50-100 crore 100-500 crore >500 crore

Yield

Finance Cost

Margin

Surplus, Sufficiency and Profitability 41

Surplus, Sufficiency and ProfitabilityChapter 3

Section-III

Sustainability of an organisation is a key factor and in MFIs it is measured through profitability and self sufficiency. Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS), Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE)

etc. are some of the key ratios that are used to determine the profitability and self sufficiency of MFIs. In this report, operational profit is taken to be the net surplus after taxes.

3.3.1 Surplus

The total net surplus (after tax) generated by the sector is `1376 crore. This is despite the fact that some AP as well as non AP based MFIs having reported negative surplus. In line with the 88% outstanding portfolio that is owned by the giant MFIs, their contribution to the net surplus is also a similar 97% at `1337 crores. Almost the entire surplus (96%), at `1319 crores of the `1376 crores is from NBFC-MFIs.

3.3.2 OperationalSelfSufficiency(OSS)

Overall, the median OSS of all the MFIs that provided data for the report stands at over 100% at 113% for the year 2015-16. This indicates that as a sector, the income from operations of the MFIs is sufficient to meet their expenses. The lowest median OSS has been reported from Society/Trust at 107% whereas understandably, the maximum median OSS was reported by NBFC-MFIs at 119%. Hence no types of MFIs as a group have an OSS less than 100%. However, 12% of the individual MFIs that were not for profit reported OSS of less than 100%, while 4% of NBFC-MFIs, mainly with an exposure of portfolio in AP, too reported an OSS of less than 100%.

Figure 3.3.1 also shows a consistent relationship between OSS and scale of operations/portfolio size. The largest MFIs have the highest OSS and vice versa.

Figure 3.3.1: OSS Across MFIs

As can be seen from Figure 3.3.2, average loan size has a direct impact on the OSS of an MFI. While very small loan sizes result in lower OSS, higher loan sizes result in higher OSS. However, it may be also observed that while the OSS improves significantly (from 106% to 115%) when average loan size increases from less than `5000 to less than `15000 and increases marginally to 119% for loan sizes over `15000.

113107 110 109

119

104 106113 110 112

127

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140


Figure 3.3.2: OSS Based on Average Loan size Figure 3.3.3: OSS Based on Yield Category

It is interesting to note the impact of yield on the OSS of MFIs. While it can be seen from Figure 3.3.3 that the median OSS increases steadily with yield till yield greater than 30%.

Impact of Operating Expense Ratio (OER) on Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS): Figure 3.3.4 shows that MFIs with the lowest OER (<10%) have the best median OSS (125%) while MFIs with the highest OERs (>14%) have the lowest median OSS (109%). The figure also shows that any decrease in OER results in significant increase in OSS.

Figure 3.3.4: OSS Based on OER of MFIs

3.3.3 ProfitabilityRatios

Since the worst crisis of the microfinance sector in 2010, the sector has come back strongly and has been going from strength to strength for the last few years. This has again brought the sector in focus for the investors as it has shown immense potential in profitability, measured by the ROA and ROE of the last few years which has made the sector attractive to investment. While the ROA and ROE have increased marginally from 1.73% and 8.19% respectively of last year, they stand at a very healthy 2.21% and 11.57% for the year 2015-16.

Figure 3.3.5 shows the distribution of ROA and ROE across different legal forms of MFIs and it makes for interesting viewing. The chart shows clearly how the asset and equity base of the different types of MFIs differ and hence how it impacts the ROA and ROE of the MFIs. It has been established from 3.3.1 that NBFC-MFIs contribute to 96% of the surplus generated by the sector. In terms of ROA and ROE, NBFC-MFIs are at 2.58% and 12.51% respectively.

106

114 115 115119

95

100

105

110

115

120

OSS vs Average Loan Size

112

114 114

116

110

112

114

116

118

<20% 20-25% 25-30% >30%

OSS vs Yield

125

113110 109

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

<10% 10-12% 12-14% >14%

OSS vs OER

Surplus, Sufficiency and Profitability 43

NBFC-MFIs have highest ROA at 2.58%, followed by Society/Trust with 2.09%. As for ROE, Cooperatives have the highest at 19.32%, followed by NBFC-MFIs with 12.51% and Society/Trust with 11.24% Cooperatives have the highest ROE but the lowest ROA. This could be attributed to a very high asset base for many cooperatives but very small equity base for most of them.

Figure 3.3.5: Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) Across MFI Types

Impact of scale of operation on ROA and ROE: Figure 3.3.6 shows a clear trend of higher ROA and ROE for larger scale of operations. Hence the largest MFIs with outstanding portfolios over `500 crores have the second highest ROA and highest ROE of 2.9% and 19.3% respectively while the MFIs with outstanding portfolio under `1 crore have ROA and ROE of only 1.9% and 9.3%. While there are minor deviations in mid sized MFIs which could be due to various factors and stage of expansion, the overall trend is that scale of operations is directly proportional to ROA and ROE.

Figure 3.3.6: Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) of MFI-Size wise

2.21 2.09 1.72 1.762.58

11.57 11.24

19.32

10.62

12.51

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

All MFIs Society & Trust Cooperative Section 8 Com NBFC - MFIs

Per

Cen

t

RoA

RoE

1.9 1.63.5 2.8 2.5 2.9

9.3

6.2

13.215.0

11.3

19.3

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

< 1 cr 1-10 cr 10-50 cr 50-100 cr 100-500 cr >500 cr

Per

Cen

t

RoA

RoE


Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital StructureChapter 3Section-IV

It is critical for MFIs to manage their balance sheet effectively in order to be able to generate better profitability, strengthen themselves and attract investors and funders. This chapter attempts to analyse the

balance sheet structure of MFIs and studies the patterns of funding and leverage as well allocation of assets.

3.4.1 MFI Assets

While the total assets of MFIs have seen a consistent growth trend over the last 6 years, it has seen a sharp increase of close to 14% in 2015-16 over the last year. This can be attributed to the sharp growth of 31% in the loan portfolio of MFIs this year.

Figure 3.4.1: MFI Total Assets - Yearly Trend

Distribution of Assets: The assets of an MFI comprise mostly of its net loan portfolio. At the end of the year 2015-16, the net loan portfolio of reporting MFIs was over 76% of the total assets. This was followed by cash and cash equivalents of 15%. Cash and cash equivalents are at this level mainly because most MFIs receive debt funding largely towards the very end of the year while it can be lent to the clients only at the beginning of next year. Trade and other receivables form the other major component of MFI assets at 6%.

Figure 3.4.2: Composition of Total Assets of MFIs

2273625240

28051

36125

51564

58621

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Am

ou

nt

(`in

cro

re)

13%

8%

74%

1%4%

Cash & Cash Equivalent

Trade and other receivable

Net Loan Portfolio

Net Fixed Asset

Any Other

Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure 45

3.4.2 Pattern of Portfolio Financing

3.4.2.i Net Owned Fund (NOF)

The MFIs reported a total Net Owned Funds (NOF) of close to `7361 crores for the year 2014-15. This NOF comprised of paid up equity, share premium, retained earnings and other reserves. NBFC-MFIs, as can be expected, hold the lion’s share of the NOF, at over 94% of the total NOF of the sector. Societies and Trusts follow with under 3% of the total NOF of the sector at `204 crores.

Equity Outstanding

Of the total NOF of `7361 crores equity constitutes nearly `4509 crores. This is marginally higher than total equity of `4195 crores in 2014-2015. The total equity has remained steady this year after seeing significant growth of 53.5% in 2012-13 to over 108% in 2013-14 and 3% in 2015-16 without Bandhan. It is understandable that NBFC-MFIs hold 98% of the equity as their legal form is the most conducive to absorb equity. Again, there is a direct correlation between equity size and portfolio size, as close to two-thirds of the total equity is held by MFIs with portfolio over `500 crores and close to 94% of the equity is held by MFIs with portfolio over `100 crores.

Figure 3.4.3: MFI Equity Outstanding - Yearly Trend and MFI-Category- wise Break-up of 2016 Figure

Fresh Equity Acquired

During the year 2015-16, the reporting MFIs collectively raised fresh equity to the tune of `679 crores. This is significantly lower than equity raised in the previous years. This is significant as this indicates that investors were awaiting the transformation of MFIs to SFBs.

Again, of the total fresh equity raised, close to 99% is by NBFC-MFIs and close to 89% by MFIs with portfolio over `500 crores.

1325

2034

4233 41954509

57 4 8

4440

0.01 65 68 147

933

3296

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Eq

uit

y O

uts

tan

din

g (

`in

cro

re)


Figure 3.4.4: Fresh Equity Raised by MFIs and MFI-Category-wise Break-up

List of Top 10 MFIs in term of equity received in showed in Figure 3.4.5.

Figure 3.4.5: Top 10 MFIs in Terms of Equity Raised

3.4.2.ii Debt Financing:

The confidence of lenders in the microfinance sector continues to grow post the AP microfinance crisis as MFIs show compliance to RBI guidelines and the strengthened regulatory framework takes effect. Strong performance of MFIs outside Andhra Pradesh, strengthening operational efficiency and the effective functioning of credit bureaus has again made banks start lending to MFIs in a major way.

679

4 2 3

671

1 4 5 860

602

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800E

qu

ity

Rai

sed

(`

in c

rore

)

8

8

10

13

20

38

55

79

118

292

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Light Microfinance Private Limited

ASA International India Microfinance Pvt Ltd.

Midland Microfin

Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt Ltd

Intrepid Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd.

Suryoday Micro Finance Ltd

Muthoot Microfin Limited

Satin Creditcare Network Limited

ESAF Microfinance & Investments Pvt Ltd

Ujjivan Financial Services Limited

Eq

uit

y R

aise

d (

` i

n c

rore

)


The total MFI debt funding for the sector has been reported at over `44822 crores during the year 2015-16. While most of this funding is through borrowing (77%) and Non-Convertible Debenture (14%), Figure 3.4.6 indicates that subordinated debt, overdraft, bonds, and savings and deposits also form some minor avenues for fundraising for MFIs. Cooperatives have the added option to raise funds through deposits and savings from borrowers/members. In addition to Debt funding, 31 MFIs have raised funds to the tune of `8834 crores through securitisation deals in 2015-16.

Figure 3.4.6: Sources of Funding Based on Types of Instruments

The total amount of outstanding borrowings as on 31st March, 2016 for all MFIs collectively was close to `44822 crores without data of Asmitha, Share Microfin and Bandhan, an increase of 10% over the last year. Of this the maximum outstanding borrowings were from public sector banks at 33 % followed by private sector banks at 28%, for a combined portfolio outstanding of over 60% (`27116 crores) of the total borrowings.

Figure 3.4.7: Sources of Funding Based on Institution Types

77%

6%

1%

14%

2%

1%

1%

Borrowing

Subordinated debt

Bond

NCD

ECB

Saving & Deposit

Any Other

14731

12385

1938

2372569

4241

8586

Source-wise Loan Amount Outstanding

Public Sector

Private Sector

SIDBI

NABARD

MUDRA

Bulk Lenders

Other Financial Institutions


Out of total outstanding borrowing to lenders, the share of NBFC-MFIs alone constitutes `43268 crore (97%), whereas NGO-MFIs hold an outstanding borrowing close to 3%. Size-wise, MFIs with portfolio size above `500 crore hold 87% of the total outstanding amount and MFIs with portfolio size of `100-500 cr. hold another 10%. Smaller MFIs hold a miniscule amount of the outstanding borrowed portfolio.

Figure 3.4.8: Outstanding Borrowing – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2016 Figure

The total debt fund received during the year (April ’15 – March ’16) for all MFIs collectively was close to `39331 crores without data of Asmitha, Share Microfin and Bandhan. Out of total debt fund received, the share of NBFC-MFIs alone constitutes `38372 crore (98%), whereas NGO-MFIs hold only 2%. Size-wise, MFIs with portfolio size above `500 crore hold 89% of the total debt fund received and MFIs with portfolio size of 100-500 cr. hold another 8%. Smaller MFIs hold a miniscule amount of the outstanding borrowed portfolio.

Figure 3.4.9: Fund Received during the year and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2016 Figure

1695920724

27662

35573

44822

528 119 907

43268

4 143 473 6984556

38948

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

39331

288 42 629

38372

2 70 269 5903284

35117

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000


It is not very difficult to understand the preference for legal form of MFIs of different lenders. It is evident that lenders of all kinds overwhelmingly prefer to lend to NBFC-MFIs over any other legal forms. This is understandable given the size of NBFC-MFIs and more importantly, the current regulatory framework.

Figure 3.4.10: Source wise Share of Loans lent among Different Legal Forms of MFIs during 2015-16

0.2%

0.02%

2%

3%

2%

3%

95%

97%

96%

99.7%

96.1%

96%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

Public Sector Banks

Private Sector Banks

SIDBI

NABARD

MUDRA

Bulk Lenders

Trust/Society

Cooperative

Section 8 Com

NBFC - MFI

It was also found that MFIs with a portfolio of `100 crore or above hold approximately 98% of the loan outstanding amount from all lenders.

Top Lenders to MFIs during 2015-16

The data of reporting MFIs has been further analysed to enumerate major banks and bulk lenders having outstanding balances with MFIs as of March 2016. The MFIs had been asked to list down lenders names who appear under Top 10 lenders as per their books as of March 2016.

Table 1 lists banks and bulk lenders respectively, which appear in the list of Top 10 lenders in the books of the MFIs. This list is obviously significant, though not exhaustive, as it contains the names of lenders who happened to be Top 10 among the reporting MFIs.

Table 3.4.1: List of Lenders Reported Among Top 10 Lenders of the Individual Reporting MFIs

(in terms of Outstanding as of March 2016)

Name of the BanksNo. of MFIs

Name of the other LendersNo. of MFIs

Allahabad Bank 3 AAV Sarl 2

Alwar Central Co-operative Bank 1 Ananya Finance 19

Andhra Bank 3 Assam Financial Corporation 3

Assam Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. 2 Au Finance 3

Assam Gramin Vikash Bank 4 Blue Orchard 3

Axis Bank 16 BNP Paribas 1

Bangiya Gramin Bikash Bank 9 Capital First 9

Bank of Baroda 5 Caspian Impact Investment Pvt. Ltd. 3

Bank of India 4 CDC Emerging Markets Ltd. 1

Bank of Maharashtra 17 Cordaid 2


Baroda Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Rajasthan 1 Dia Vikas 5

Bharatiya Mahila Bank 4 Edelweise ARC 1

Canara Bank 20 Electronica 1

Catholic Syrian Bank 3 FWWB 7

Central Bank 7 Gojamjunde Finance Corp 1

Citibank 1 Gruh Finance Ltd 1

Corporation Bank 8 Habitat for Humanity India Trust, New Delhi 3

DCB Bank 9 Hinduja Leyland 1

Dena Bank 14 IFMR 15

Dhanalakshmi Bank 3 IGS 15

Federal Bank 5 Incofin 1

Grameen Bank of Aryawart 1 Intellegrow 1

Gujarat Mahila Sewa Energy Bank 1 Kashi Vishwanath Vigdhya Samithi 1

HDFC Bank 19 Kaushal Vintrade Pvt. Ltd. 1

HSBC Bank 5 KIVA 4

ICICI 13 Karnataka State Financial Corporation 1

IDBI 46 L&T 3

IDFC 7 Maanaveeya 18

Indian Bank 9 Manappuram 1

Indian Overseas Bank 14 MAS 32

IndusInd Bank 8 Michael & Susan Dell Foundation 1

Karnataka Bank 2 Micro Build 1

Karnataka Vikas Grameen Bank 1 Microfinance Initiative for Asia (MIFA) 1

Kashi Gomti Samyut Gramin Bank 1 Microfinance Solidaire 1

Kaveri Grameen Bank 2 MicroGraam Social Development Foundation 2

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 3 Microvest 1

Lakshmi Vilas Bank 6 MILAAP 3

NABARD 30 MUDRA 4

National Housing Bank 1 Muthoot Capital 4

Oriental Bank of Commerce 4 Nabkisan Finance Ltd 3

Primary Agri - Cultural Bank 1National Scheduled Catse Finance & Development Corporation 1

Pallavan Grama Bank 3 National Skill Development Corporation 1

Punjab and Sind Bank 1 Navaratra Trade Link 1

Punjab National Bank 6 NEDFI 10

Rabobank 3 Northern India Consultants Pvt. Ltd. 1

Ratnakar Bank 8 OIKO Credit 2

RBL Bank 8 One Acre Venture Pvt. Ltd. 1

Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) 1 Rang De 2

Repco Bank 1 Rashtriya Mahila Kosh 10

SIDBI 39 Relaince Capital Ltd. 30

South Indian Bank 5 Reliance Home Finance Limited 2

Standard Chartered Bank 6 Religare 12

State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur 3 ResponAbility 3


State Bank of Hyderabad 3 Sampark Fin Services Ltd 1

State Bank of India 45 Symbiotic 5

State Bank of Mysore 1 Toyata Financial Services 2

State Bank of Patiala 2 Triple Jump 1

State Bank of Travancore 5 World Business Capital 1

Syndicate Bank 6

Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. 2

Tiruchi District Central Cooperative Bank 1

The Assam Co-Op Bank Ltd. 1

Triodo Bank 2

UCO Bank 14

Union Bank 17

United Bank of India 6

Vijaya Bank 12

Yes Bank 8

Table 3.4.2: MFI wise Loan Outstanding (based on top 10 lenders data) to Lenders

S.No. Name of MFIsAmount (` in crore)

Outstanding

1 Adhikar 0.76

2 Adhikar Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd. 27.68

3 Agradut Polly Unnyan Samity 1.39

4 Ajagar Social Circle 9.48

5 Altura Financial Services Ltd. 17.18

6 Anik Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 1.17

7 Annapurna Mahila Coop Credit Society Ltd. 47.79

8 Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd. 463.05

9 Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 301.60

10 Arth Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 16.38

11 ASA International India Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 81.33

12 Asomi Finance Pvt. Ltd. 15.37

13 B U R S 0.57

14 Bagaria Relief Welfare Ambulance Society 0.26

15 Balajee Sewa Sansthan 0.04

16 Bal Mahila Vikas Samiti-VAMA 3.65

17 Barasat Unnayan Prostuti 0.30

18 Belghoria Janakalyan Samity 20.12

19 Bengal Women Welfare Association 0.18

20 Bhartiya Micro Credit 70.94

21 Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd. 179.10

22 Blaze Trust 1.70


23 BSS Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 300.69

24 BWDA Finance Ltd. 1.63

25 Cashpor Micro Credit 559.61

26 Centre for Development Orientation & Training 8.53

27 Chaitanya India Fin Credit Pvt. Ltd. 111.73

28 Chanura Microfin Manipur 5.19

29 Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society 4.54

30 Dhosa Chandaneswar Bratyajana Samity 5.63

31 Disha India Micro Credit 0.62

32 dMatrix Development Foundation 0.95

33 Duttapukur Institute for Social Advancement 0.38

34 Equitas Micro Finance Ltd. 0.02

35 ESAF Microfinance & Investments Pvt. Ltd. 626.55

36 Forum for Rural Environment and Economic Development 4.14

37 Future Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 301.96

38 Futureage India Micro Credit Services 3.15

39 G B P Nobel Microfinances 0.01

40 Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Ltd. 605.14

41 GUARDIAN 20.71

42 Grameen Development & Finance Pvt. Ltd. 19.95

43 Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 988.95

44 Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh 8.24

45 Gramotthan Micro Finance Company 2.79

46 Gram Utthan 13.26

47 Growing Opportunity Finance (India) Pvt. Ltd. 85.66

48 Hand in Hand India 47.90

49 Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 48.52

50 Humana People to People India 9.41

51 IDF Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 59.72

52 IMPACT 18.18

53 Institute of Rural Credit and Entrepreneurship Development 7.59

54 Intrepid Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. 194.78

55 Jagaran Microfin Pvt. Ltd. 116.89

56 Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd. 3345.47

57 Jeevankiran 8.90

58 Kotalipara Development Society 31.86

59 Life Foundation 2.86

60 Light Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 50.00

61 Madura Micro Finance Ltd. 333.49

62 Mahasemam Trust 59.10

63 Mahashakti Foundation 11.93

64 Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd. 104.58


65 Matashree Gomati Devi Jan Seva Nidhi 356.98

66 Midland Microfin Ltd. 71.52

67 Muthoot Microfin Ltd. 831.00

68 NABARD Financial Services Ltd. 830.42

69 Namra Finance Ltd. 79.41

70 Navachetana Microfin Services Pvt. Ltd. 51.82

71 Network of Entrepreneurship & Economic Development 7.31

72 Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd. 33.61

73 North East Region Finservices Ltd. 283.93

74 Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action 0.96

75 Pahal Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 16.84

76 People's Action for Transformation 12.52

77 Peoples Forum 12.43

78 Planned Social Concern 4.00

79 Pragathi Seva Samithi 0.88

80 Prakruthi Foundation 2.40

81 PRAYAS - Organization for Sustainable Development 14.58

82 Prochesta Thrift & Credit Co-Operative Society Asom Ltd. 1.44

83 Purba Barasat Prerana 0.83

84 Rashtriya Seva Samithi 48.58

85 Repco Micro Finance Ltd. 264.46

86 RGVN (NE) Microfinance Ltd. 343.46

87 RORS Finance Pvt. Ltd. 5.78

88 Rural Education Action and Development 1.77

89 S.M.I.L.E. Microfinance Ltd. 119.43

90 Sahara Utsarga Welfare Society 29.78

91 Saija Finance Pvt. Ltd. 56.71

92 Sakhi Samudaya Kosh 6.93

93 Samasta Micro Finance Ltd. 36.95

94 Sambandh Finserve Pvt. Ltd. 75.61

95 Samhita Community Development Services 22.81

96 Sampurna Training and Entrepreneurship Programme 1.41

97 Sanghamithra Rural Financial Services 109.98

98 Sarala Development and Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 47.97

99 Sarvodaya Nano Finance Ltd. 20.99

100 Satin Creditcare Network Ltd. 1566.72

101 Seba - Rahara 9.13

102 Shikhar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 59.39

103 Social Action for Rural Community 0.22

104 Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra 9.55

105 Sonata Finance Pvt. Ltd 384.58

106 Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd. 1095.22


107 Sreema Mahila Samity 20.74

108 Suryoday Micro Finance Ltd 482.17

109 SV Creditline Pvt. Ltd. 302.37

110 Swayamsampurna 0.20

111 Swayamshree Mahila Samabaya Samiti Ltd. 0.40

112 Swayamshree Micro Credit Services 24.00

113 The Eastern Multipurpose Coop Society ltd. 1.21

114 The Saath Saving And Credit Co Operative Society Ltd. 0.40

115 UACCO Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 27.36

116 Ujjivan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 2280.32

117 Unnati Microfin Pvt. Ltd. 4.58

118 Utkarsh Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 782.90

119 Uttrayan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 37.60

120 Varam Capital Pvt. Ltd. 76.00

121 Vedika Credit Capital Ltd. 123.42

122 Village Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 163.25

123 Virutcham Microfinance Ltd. 2.98

124 Vivekananda Sevakendra -O- Sishu Uddyan 4.47

125 VVD 3.26

126 Welfare Services Ernakulam 44.14

127 WSDS Initiate 8.97

128 Yukti Samaj Sewa Society 0.22

129 YVU Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 5.06

Total 20718

Table 3.4.3: Lender wise Loan Outstanding (based top 10 lenders data) to MFIs

S.N. Name of the Lenders Amount (` in crore)

Outstanding

1 AAV Sarl 65.65

2 Allahabad 15.94

3 Alwar Central Co-operative Bank 2.00

4 Ananya 34.07

5 Andhra Bank 48.69

6 Assam Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. 1.66

7 Assam Financial Corporation 0.62

8 Assam Gramin Vikash Bank 14.65

9 Au Finance 16.60

10 Axis Bank Ltd. 1146.60

11 Bangiya Gramin Bikash Bank 23.56

12 Bank of Baroda 144.96

13 Bank of India 59.53

14 Bank of Maharashtra 159.11


15 Baroda Kshetriya Gramin Bank Rajasthan 18.05

16 Bharatiya Mahila Bank 9.85

17 Blue Orchard 159.40

18 BNP Paribas 0.60

19 Canara Bank 118.04

20 Capital First 125.83

21 Caspian Impact Investment Pvt. Ltd. 14.60

22 Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. 33.16

23 CDC Emerging Markets Ltd. 0.001

24 Central Bank of India 72.26

25 Citi Bank 23.50

26 Cordaid 2.48

27 Corporation Bank 24.11

28 Dena Bank 144.34

29 Development Credit Bank 169.69

30 Dhanalakshmi Bank 118.64

31 Dia Vikas 27.67

32 Edelweise ARC 8.68

33 Electronica 2.48

34 Federal Bank 164.37

35 FWWB 2.74

36 Gojamjunde Finance Corp 0.01

37 Grameen Bank of Aryawart 4.02

38 Gruh Finance Ltd. 0.15

39 Gujarat Mahila Sewa Energy Bank 0.11

40 Habitat for Humanity India 0.98

41 HDFC Bank 821.84

42 Hinduja Leyland 7.50

43 HSBC Bank 543.30

44 ICICI Bank Ltd. 1162.02

45 IDBI Bank 2136.84

46 IDFC Bank 239.55

47 IFMR 341.65

50 IGS 3.75

48 Incofin 40.00

49 Indian Bank 64.03

51 Indian Overseas Bank 226.73

52 IndusInd Bank 893.59

53 Intellegrow 2.69

54 Karnataka Bank 14.71

55 Karnataka Vikas Grameen Bank 14.20

56 Kashi Gomti Samyut Gramin Bank 4.21

57 Kashi Vishwanath Vigdhya Samithi 1.60


58 Kaushal Vintrade Pvt. Ltd. 0.60

59 Kaveri Grameen Bank 3.05

60 KIVA 26.34

61 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 197.21

62 KSFC 0.62

63 L&T 37.26

64 Lakshmi Vilas Bank 82.86

65 Maanaveeya 110.73

66 Manappuram 10.00

67 MAS 612.43

68 Michael & Susan Dell Foundation 5.91

69 Micro Build 2.00

70 Microfinance Initiative for Asia (MIFA) 35.00

71 Microfinance Solidaire 0.65

72 MicroGraam Social Development Foundation 0.39

73 Microvest 33.00

74 MILAAP 2.92

75 MUDRA 81.65

76 Muthoot Capital 33.97

77 NABARD 2245.53

78 Nabkisan Finance Ltd 3.81

79 National Housing Bank 1.49

80 National Scheduled Catse Finance & Development Corporation 0.15

81 National Skill Development Corporation 1.49

82 Navaratra Trade Link 0.50

83 NEDFI 118.11

84 North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Ltd. 4.34

85 Northern India Consultants Pvt. Ltd. 0.57

86 OIKO Credit 10.68

87 One Acre Venture Pvt. Ltd. 0.10

88 Oriental Bank of Commerce 38.82

89 PACB 0.26

90 Pallavan Grama Bank 9.31

91 Punjab and Sind Bank 59.43

92 Punjab National Bank 211.26

93 Rabobank 11.82

94 Rang De 1.12

95 Rashtriya Mahila Kosh 1.94

96 Ratnakar Bank 550.18

97 RBL Bank 395.75

98 RBS 22.00

99 Reliance Capital Ltd 307.38

100 Reliance Financial Services 0.13


101 Reliance Home Finance Limited 10.36

102 RELIGARE 134.14

103 Repco Bank 193.41

104 ResponAbility 195.00

105 Sampark Fin Services Ltd. 0.35

106 SIDBI 1175.94

107 South Indian Bank Ltd. 51.17

108 Standard Chartered Bank 648.85

109 State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur 10.62

110 State Bank of Hyderabad 30.29

111 State Bank of India 882.78

112 State Bank of Mysore 19.82

113 State Bank of Patiala 4.23

114 State Bank of Travancore 57.42

115 Symbiotic 270.28

116 Syndicate Bank 192.95

117 Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. 1.52

118 TDCCB 0.38

119 The Assam Co-op Bank Ltd. 5.96

120 TMB 10.00

121 Toyata Financial Services 0.13

122 Triodos Bank 86.70

123 Triple Jump 46.74

124 UCO Bank 87.15

125 Union Bank of India 272.37

126 United Bank of India 15.88

127 Vijaya Bank 136.93

128 World Business Capital 26.56

129 Yes Bank 908.18

130 Others 471.52

Total 20718

3.4.3 Capital1 (Net owned Fund) to Total Asset Ratio

The Capital Adequacy of Indian MFIs, by and large, is well above the prescribed norms. The RBI has stipulated that NBFC-MFIs need to maintain at least 15 per cent capital on their risk weighted assets. The risk-weighted asset details are not readily available. However, with the help of Net Owned Fund and Total Asset particulars, Figure 3.4.11 brings out the estimates of CAR for the MFIs who reported this data. The median CAR for 2015-16 stands at 19.4, which is slightly higher the figure of 19.1 for 2014-15.

NBFC-MFIs, for which maintaining Capital adequacy is now mandatory, have an adequate CAR of 20.1% in aggregate, while Sec-8 Companies have a CAR of 19.2%. Trust/Society also have a median CAR above the desirable limit of 17.1%. Only Cooperatives have a median CAR below the desirable limit of 17%.

1 The capital includes the free reserves and surplus also ( collectively termed as Net Owned Fund)


Figure 3.4.11: Capital to Total Asset Ratio

3.4.4 Leverage / Debt – Equity2 Ratio

MFIs, like any other business institution, use their own funds as a base for borrowing from banks. Their borrowing capacity depends on their capital. This leverage is generally understood as a multiple of their own capital amount; these borrowings are from outside sources including banks. Debt-Equity Ratio is the parameter considered for measuring the extent of leveraging of equity to raise outside debt. The leverage needs to be optimum to balance between the profitability and stability of MFIs.

Figure 3.4.12: Debt - Equity Ratio Trend and Break–up of 2016 Figure across MFI –Categories

Median for 2016 3.2

Society/Trust 2.3

Cooperative 1.4

Section 8 Com 2.7

NBFC-MFI 3.5

<1 cr. 0.6

1-10 cr. 0.6

10-50 cr. 2.6

50-100 cr. 3.7

100-500 cr. 3.9

>500 cr. 4.1

Leverage of NBFC-MFIs is highest at 3.5, followed by Section 8 companies at 2.7. Society/Trust and Cooperatives have a leverage ratio of 2.3 and 1.4 respectively. According to Size of MFIs, MFIs with portfolio of more than `500 crore have the highest median leverage of 4.1.

2 Equity refers to Net Owned Fund (Equity + Free Reserves and Surplus)

19.4 19.619.1

19.4

17.1 17.0

19.2

20.1

1515.5

1616.5

1717.5

1818.5

1919.5

2020.5

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.02016

Society / Trust

Cooperative

Section 8 Com

NBFC-MFI

< 1 crore1-10 crore

10-50 crore

50-100 crore

100-500 crore

>500 crore

Credit Plus Activities 59

Credit Plus ActivitiesChapter 4

Financial inclusion is not an Indian specific problem, it is global one. So now Financial inclusion is a topic of increasing interest on the international policy agenda. But in India, home to the second largest

population in the world, with huge mass of people below the poverty line spread across nearly 600,000 villages in 600 districts, it assumes utmost importance. India’s government has a long tradition of promoting financial inclusion. For more than 40 years, the Reserve Bank of India has been operating priority sector lending mandating a portion of banks’ loan portfolios to be in the agriculture sector and to small and micro enterprises. In 2005, it required banks to offer basic no-frills accounts with no, or very low, minimum balances and affordable charges. However, use of these accounts has been very low. In 2011, banks were advised to provide at a minimum four products: (a) a savings or overdraft account, (b) a remittance product for electronic transfer of government benefits and other remittances, (c) a pure savings product (ideally a recurring-deposit scheme), and (d) entrepreneurial credit. In a parallel initiative, in 2010 the government and the central bank set goals to provide by 2015 all villages in India with a banking outlet (either by a branch or a retail agent, in India known as a business correspondent), with stipulated annual targets along the way. While these targets were not specified by law, the Reserve Bank of India requires all banks to report progress regularly and closely monitors their achievements. It is still too early to say how successful the implementation of these ambitious goals will be. Some banks have risen to the challenge and opened numerous new outlets (mostly business correspondents). Others have complained that the financial inclusion targets hurt their profits.

For taking Financial Inclusion agenda forward, RBI granted “in-principle” licensing of 11 payments banks and 10 small finance banks. 11 payments Banks includes, Indian Post Office as the Indian post office has a huge network of branches with an unique outreach in rural areas. The sector is poised for much-needed disruption that will bring millions of Indian households into the formal financial system for the first time.

The nation has also enlarged the envelope of Financial Inclusion by including insurance, pension and other activities into its definition and priorities. The Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), which advocates for micro insurance and pension along with credit and savings, is one such recent development for an inclusive financial system. However, the Microfinance sector which is comprised of MFIs and SHPIs/SHGs has been proactively providing credit plus services such as micro-credit, savings, micro-insurance, micro-pensions, and other development related activities. The sector clearly understands the importance of credit plus services to low-income people. This chapter throws a light on such credit plus activities provided by MFIs and SHPIs.

4.1 Micro Insurance1

Micro-Insurance is much younger than other financial services for the poor and receives significant attention from all stakeholders. In order to facilitate penetration of micro insurance to the lower income segments of population, IRDA has formulated the micro insurance regulations. Micro Insurance Regulations, 2005 provide a platform to distribute insurance products, which are affordable to the rural and urban poor and to enable micro insurance to be an integral part of the country’s wider insurance system. The main thrust of micro insurance regulations is protection of low income people with affordable insurance products to help cope with and recover from common risks with standardized popular insurance products adhering to certain levels of cover, premium and benefit standards. These regulations have allowed Non Government Organizations (NGOs) and Self Help Groups (SHGs) to act as agents to insurance companies in marketing

1 IRDA Annual Report 2014-15.

The Bharat Microfinance Report 2016 60

the micro insurance products and have also allowed both life and non-life insurers to promote combi-micro insurance products.

The Authority has reviewed the Micro Insurance Regulations, 2005 comprehensively and notified IRDAI (Micro Insurance) Regulations, 2015 permitting several more entities like Business Correspondents of Scheduled commercial banks, District Co-operative banks, Regional Rural Banks, Urban Co-operative banks, Primary agricultural co-operative societies, other co-operative societies, RBI regulated NBFC-MFI’s to improve penetration of Micro Insurance.

The individual new business premium under the micro insurance segment for the year 2014-15 stood at `28.89 Crore for 8.16 lakh new policies, the group business premium amounted to `315.60 crore covering 2.31 crore lives. LIC contributed to a significant component of the business procured in this portfolio by garnering `16.40 crores of individual new business premium under 4 lakh policies and `281.93 crore of group premium covering 2.06 Crore lives.

The number of micro insurance agents at the end of March 2015 stood at 20855; of which 19379 agents pertained to the LIC and the remaining represented the private sector companies. Thirteen life insurers had 21 micro insurance products as at 31.3.2015. Of these 21 products, 13 were Individual products and the remaining 8 were Group products.

4.1.1 MFIs Acting as Micro Insurance Agents

In distributing micro insurance products, the insurance industry faces various challenges such as (1) challenge of high transaction cost, (2) high upfront investments to reduce risk so that premiums are affordable, (3) technical knowhow etc. MFIs are well placed to overcome these challenges given their experience in providing financial products in remote areas. Microfinance Institutions are one of the most effective and efficient delivery channels for credit; further adding micro insurance to the product mix enables them to achieve both social and economic objectives. Additionally, MFIs not only provide micro-insurance policies but also spread awareness about risk management. MFIs help their clients choose cost effective policies out of the 28 micro insurance products. MFIs do face some challenges in providing micro-insurance policies, which include:

(1) Relationship challenges with insurers such as burdensome claims documentation, delays in paying claims, and occasional claims rejections.

(2) To structure the product and price it appropriately, as they typically lack the in-house expertise to do this. The two most common approaches are either: (a) to pick a nice round number that the MFI thinks the clients can afford; or (b) the MFI copies the pricing offered by insurers.

(3) Other challenge of delivering the policies is of educating staff and clients about the products.

However a large numbers of MFIs have been providing micro insurance products. As the Table 4.1 below shows, 15 MFIs have reached to 3.66 lakh clients for health products and Table 4.2 states that 39 MFIs have reached to 55.38 lakh clients for non-health products.


Table 4.1: MFIs Involved in Micro Insurance-Health

S.N. Name of the Organisation State No. of Client

1 Annapurna Mahila Coop Credit Society Ltd. Maharashtra 192195

2 Centre For Development Orientation & Training Karnataka 5017

3 Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Karnataka 74831

4 Growing Opportunity Finance (India) Pvt. Ltd. Kerala 524

5 Mass Care International Gujarat 600

6 Micro Enterprises & Sustainable Projects Odisha 13

7 Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action Bihar 1260

8 Prochesta Thrift & Credit Co-Operative Society Asom Ltd. Odisha 1250

9 Rural Education Action and Development Odisha 75

10 Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd. Assam 4636

11 Sanghamithra Rural Financial Services Bihar 38635

12 Swayamshree Micro Credit Services Tamil Nadu 56

13 The Eastern Multipurpose coop Society ltd. Tamil Nadu 6762

14 The Saath Saving And Credit Co Operative Society Limited Odisha 8690

15 Welfare Services Ernakulam Jharkhand 31478

Total 366022

Note: The number of clients under microinsurance programmes appears lower than 2014-15 as fewer MFIs have provided data on this aspect.

Table 4.2: MFIs Involved in Micro Insurance - Non-health

S.N Name of the Organization State No. of Clients

1 Agradut Polly Unnyan Samity West Bengal 4122

2 Annapurna Mahila Coop Credit Society Ltd. Maharashtra 50076

3 Balajee Sewa Sansthan Uttarakhand 1400

4 Bengal Women Welware Association West Bengal 128

5 Blaze Trust Tamil Nadu 4545

6 Cashpor Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh 710201

7 Deshabandhu Micro Finance and Livelihood Institution Assam 130

8 Dhosa Chandaneswar Bratyajana Samity (DCBS) West Bengal 2500

9 Disha India Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh 65515

10 dMatrix Development Foundation Maharashtra 2952

11 G B P Nobel Microfinance Maharashtra 120

12 G U Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Odisha 59774

13 Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Ltd. Tamil Nadu 1045684

14 Grameen Development & Finance Pvt. Ltd. Assam 15440


16 Hand in Hand India Tamil Nadu 63752

17 IMPACT Tamil Nadu 13164

18 Kotalipara Development Society (KDS) West Bengal 2803

19 Krishna Bhima Samruddhi Local Area Bank Ltd. Telangana 34656

20 Mahashakti Foundation Odisha 89464

21 Mass Care International Bihar 600

22 Midland Microfin Punjab 2002


23 Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action (ODISHA)

Odisha 865

24 PRAYAS - Organization for sustainable development Gujarat 20657

25 Rashtriya Seva Samithi (RASS) Andhra Pradesh 38832

26 Rural Education Action and Development Tamil Nadu 125

27 Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd. Odisha 53567

28 Samhita Community Development Services Madhya Pradesh 261718

29 Sampada Entrepreneurship & Livelihoods Foundation Maharashtra 20170

30 Shroff Capital and Finance Pvt. Ltd. Gujarat 3936

31 Social Action for Rural Community Odisha 373

32 Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra West Bengal 3395

33 Sreema Mahila Samity West Bengal 6920

34 Swashree Mahila Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Madhya Pradesh 5739

35 Swayamshree Micro Credit Services Odisha 5065

36 Virutcham Microfinance Limited Tamil Nadu 5474

37 Volunteers for Village Development Manipur 2911

38 Welfare Services Ernakulam Kerala 21478

39 Yukti Samaj Sewa Society Madhya Pradesh 289

Total 5538101

Note: The number of clients under microinsurance programmes appears lower than 2014-15 as fewer MFIs have provided data on this aspect.

4.2 Micro Pension2

The country’s population pyramid is expected to “bulge” across the 15–64 age brackets over the next decade. Around 64% of India’s population is expected to be in the age bracket of 15–59 years by 2026, with 13% of the total aged above 60 years. However, India’s demographic dividend is expected to level off around 2040. In 2050, the old age dependency ratio is likely to increase to 18.7 % of the total population from 8.6 % in 2011. With the shift to nuclear families, intergenerational support cannot be the sole source of old age security. At this juncture, it is important to get prepared for the future challenge of old age income security of our people in their sunset years.

In India, almost 400 million people (more than 85% of working population of the country) work in the unorganized sector and 88 % of the Indian workforce are excluded from pension coverage. Of these, at least 120 million are women and the majority has no access to a formal old age income security scheme. Tenuous labor market attachments, intermittent incomes, poor access to social security etc render the unorganized workers highly vulnerable to economic shocks during their working lives and deprive them of old age security. Swavalamban is one such program supported by the Government to provide a pension scheme under NPS.

4.2.1 NPS: Swavalamban

Swavalamban Scheme, a co-contributory Pension Scheme, launched in September, 2010 to encourage people from the unorganised sector to voluntarily save for their retirement. The Central Government would contribute a sum of ̀ 1,000 in each National Pension System (NPS) account opened under the Scheme where the subscriber is able to save `1,000 to `12,000 during a financial year. The Government’s contribution is available upto Financial Year 2016-17. The scheme is for those citizens of India who are not part of any statutory pension/provident scheme. The target beneficiaries of Swavalamban Scheme are co-contributory

2 PFRDA


scheme beneficiaries of State Governments, Aanganwaadi workers, Construction workers, Occupational classes like weavers, fishermen, farmers, dairy workers etc.

It is an ambitious flagship scheme of the Government of India, forming an integral and important part of the overall NPS (National Pension System) program. The scheme signifies an element of self-pride through participation of the less fortunate and excluded segments. Opening an account with NPS provides a Permanent Retirement Account Number (PRAN), which is a unique number and it remains with the subscriber throughout his lifetime.

Atal Pension Yojana (APY) has been launched by the government with effect from June 1, 2015 which provides the strategic direction for shaping the pension landscape in the country to convert the society from “pension less” to “pensioned” one in the largely uncovered informal sector. As pension involves a long term commitment, there is a need to create awareness and financial literacy to encourage informal sector worker to save for their retirement.

Under APY, the Central Government co-contributes 50% of the subscriber’s contribution or `1000 per annum, whichever is lower, to each eligible subscriber account, for a period of 5 years, i.e., from 2015-16 to 2019-20, who join the NPS before December 31, 2015 and who are not income tax payers. State Governments can also co-contribute under APY to their underlying workers like Anganwadi, ASHA, and Construction Labour etc. to encourage the subscribers to join the scheme and secure their old age. The subscribers of APY would receive minimum pension of `1000 to `5000 per month, at the age of 60 years, depending on their contributions, which itself would vary depending on the age of joining the APY. APY has low costs and has access in rural areas via existing networks of post offices and banks.

4.2.2 Composition of NPS Subscribers3

The number of subscribers under National Pension Scheme (NPS) and Atal Pension Yojana (APY) increased to 127.17 lakh and Assets under Management under NPS have increased to `126889 crore as end of May 2016. The decline in number of subscribers under NPS Lite is partly due to migration of eligible NPS Lite/Swavalamban subscribers to APY. The table depicting the same is as under:

Figure 4.1: Composition of NPS Subscribers

3 Pension Bulletin (June 2016)

127

45

30

17

29

6

35

24

13

23

5

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Total

NPS Lite

State Government Employees

Central Government Employees

Atal Pension Yojana (APY)

Others

No. of Subscriber (in Lakh) %


The scheme is structured into two tiers:

Tier - I account: This is the non - withdrawable permanent retirement account into which the accumulations are deposited and invested as per the option of the subscriber.

Tier - II account: This is a voluntary withdrawable account which is allowed only when there is an active Tier I account in the name of the subscriber. The withdrawals are permitted from this account as per the needs of the subscriber as and when claimed.

4.2.3 Pradhan Mantri Bima Yojana

Under Pradhan Mantri Bima Yojana, two schemes – (1) Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (life insurance policy) and (2) Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (personal accident policy) have been launched by Central Government to increase the insurance penetration in the country.

Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana is a government-backed accident insurance scheme in India. It was originally mentioned in the 2015 Budget speech by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in February 2015. It was formally launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 9 May in Kolkata. As of May 2015, only 20% of India’s population has any kind of insurance, this scheme aims to increase the number.

Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana is available to people between 18 and 70 years of age with bank accounts. It has an annual premium of `12 excluding service tax, which is about 14% of the premium. The amount will be automatically debited from the account. In case of accidental death or full disability, the payment to the nominee will be `200000 and in case of partial disability `100000. Full disability has been defined as loss of use in both eyes, hands or feet. Partial disability has been defined as loss of use in one eye, hand or foot.

This scheme will be linked to the bank accounts opened under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme. Most of these accounts had zero balances initially. The government aims to reduce the number of such zero balance accounts by using this and related schemes.

Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana is a government-backed Life insurance scheme in India. It was also formally launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 9 May in Kolkata. As of May 2015, only 20% of India’s population has any kind of insurance, this scheme aims to increase the number.

Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana is available to people between 18 and 50 years of age with bank accounts. It has an annual premium of `330 excluding service tax, which is above 14% of the premium. The amount will be automatically debited from the account. In case of death due to any cause, the payment to the nominee will be `200000.

This scheme will be linked to the bank accounts opened under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme. Most of these accounts had zero balances initially. The government aims to reduce the number of such zero balance accounts by using this and related schemes.

A number of MFIs have been providing micro pension services under various schemes. As the Table 4.3 below states, 11 MFIs have reached to 18.59 lakh clients.


Table 4.3: MFIs involved in Micro Pension

S.N. Name of the Organisation State No. of Client

1 Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd Karnataka 1674416

2 Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd. Gujarat 76017

3 Cashpor Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh 49120

4 BWDA Finance Ltd Tamil Nadu 31571


6 People's Action for Transformation Tamil Nadu 5534

7 Samhita Community Development Services Madhya Pradesh 1978

8 Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd. Odisha 529

9 Swayamshree Micro Credit Services Odisha 446

10 Centre For Development Orientation & Training Bihar 111

11 Micro Enterprises & Sustainable Projects (MESP) Jharkhand 3

Total 1858933

4.3 Other Development Services

As we have seen, the Microfinance sector (MFIs, SHPIs, SHG federations etc.) along with other stakeholders has been significantly contributing in providing micro-insurance and micro-pension. There are also various other services which the MFIs and SHPIs provide, such as capacity building, empowerment of the community (especially for the women), education, financial literacy, housing, health and sanitation, training, livelihoods support etc. The reported MFIs undertake several developmental activities. No. of MFIs engaged in such activities is indicated in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4: Development Services of Reporting MFIs

Development Activities No. of MFIs

Capacity Building Initiatives 37

Education 34

Financial Literacy 52

Water and Sanitation 34

Livelihood Promotion 52

Preventive Healthcare 38

Training Initiatives 63

Sa-Dhan has received special reports from MFIs on their development activities undertaken during the last year. The primarily development interventions of reporting MFIs are summarized in Tables 4.5, 4.6, & 4.7.


Table 4.5: MFIs and Livelihoods Intervention

Name of MFI Main Livelihood Promotion Initiatives

Agradut Polly Unnyan Samity Sanitary Napkin, Readymade Garments

Anik Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Training of Business Activities

Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Skill Building training as a part of CSR

Balajee Sewa Sansthan SHG promotional, Vocational Training

Bal-Mahila Vikas Samiti -VAMA Running livelihood project in Block Morar with support of Church Auxiliaries for Social Action, Bhopal

Barasat Sampark Skill & Capacity Development for beneficiaries /members

Bengal Women Welware Association Shola Dry Flower Manufacturing

Blaze Trust New business ventures, Value addition trainings, Business plan preparation.

BWDA Finance Ltd Animal Husbandry and Milch animal. Distributed milch animal loans in collaboration with NABARD

Centre for Promoting Sustainable Livelihood(CPSL)

Analysis of livelihood processs taken by Group members

Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society (DBIS)

Training on Embroidery, Clay Modelling, Leather

Dhosa Chandaneswar Bratyajana Samity

Tailoring Training

Equitas Micro Finance Ltd Skill Training is being imparted to interested members for helping them to earn additional income

Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh Compost bed, Azola bed

Gram-Utthan Livelihood promotion through integrated fish firming credit & technical support

Hand in Hand India Family based enterprises created

IMPACT On business development and income generation activities

Kotalipara Development Society (KDS)

Livelihood promotion activity like beautician, Tailoring, Driving, Distribu-tion of Van Rickshaw.

Mahasemam Trust Promoted Goat livelihood

Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd. Solar Products

Micro Enterprises & Sustainable Projects (MESP)

Through biri manufacturing, tailoring cluster development fish culture promotion, dairy sub sector promotion.

NABARD Financial Services Limited Sustainable Livelihood

Opportunity Microfinance India Ltd Provided loans for livelihood opportunities.

Pragathi Seva Samithi Conducted Micro Enterprises Trainings.

Prakruthi Foundation Agri. Training & Market Linkages

PRAYAS - Organization for sustain-able development

Promoted them to grow their business in terms of purchase agriculture products, livestock's and also for their small other businesses.

Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre (Prayas Micro Credit)

Beneficiaries placed under Jeevika in Bihar and Jharkhand states, under RSLDC in Rajasthan and under DWSSC in Delhi

Sampada Entrepreneurship & Liveli-hoods Foundation

The Borrowers were motivated and provided with credit for start up their livelihood activity.


Sampurna Training and Entrepre-neurship Programme

Vocational Training

Satin Creditcare Network Limited Improving Dhokra craft Artisan Livelihood opportunity at Sadaiberini village of Dhenkanal district of Odisha by setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) with advance equipment, tools at the village level, & ensure availability required technology, product diversification, design develop-ment, and provide a marketing space for merchandise manufactured by the rural artisans in nearest vicinity possible.

Shikhar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. Shikhar aims at providing financial services to promote livelihood oppor-tunities.

Social Action for Rural Community Livelihood training to beneficiaries on Vegetable/Paddy cultivation, Goat rearing, Mushroom Cultivation, Poultry farming, Handloom etc.

Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra

Financial support has been provided for creation of livelihood promotion.

Swayamsampurna Promoting organization Jeevika Development Society conducting training programme for livelihood activities( tailoring unit and Agricultural unit)

Swayamshree Micro Credit Services Livelihood promotion of 10 beneficiaries on ice cream and other milk prod-ucts, 30 beneficiaries on mushroom cultivation and for 15 beneficiaries on tailoring centre provided.

Varam Capital Private Limited In the worst ever floods in Chennai during December 2015, Varam team actively participated in the relief across different areas of the city. Team has contributed to the Chennai Flood Relief by distributing blankets, milk, food packet, water bottles and other emergency relief materials.

Note: The list of MFIs taking up these services is not exhaustive.

Table 4.6: MFIs and General Education Intervention

Name of MFI Main General Education Initiatives

Agradut Polly Unnyan Samity Creche Centre, Sponsored by Central Social Welfare Board, New Delhi

Anik Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Provides Awareness of Govt Schemes to members.

Bagaria Releif Welfare Ambulance Society Pre primary school.

Balajee Sewa Sansthan Child education

Barasat Sampark Books & other material purchasing for poor students

Blaze Trust Importance of child education

BURS Running a free pre-primary school

BWDA Finance Ltd BWDA gives general education apart from awareness and advocacy education through schools, colleges and polytechnics for the academic excellence. Community Knowledge centre is another aspect in which BWDA gives education facilities to the poor and downtrodden students in the community very practically in 30 villages of Tamil Nadu covering 2500 students.

Cashpor Micro Credit Remedial education program through PRATHAM and In-House as CEC.

Centre for Promoting Sustainable Liveli-hood(CPSL)

Educational loan for private tuition and private school.


Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society (DBIS) Arranging coaching classes at school level.

Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Interactive awareness program called “Jagruthi”, wherein awareness on various socially relevant subjects is communicated through open letters sent to all members.

Growing Opportunity Finance (India) Pvt. Ltd Awareness on Girl Child Education, Women Rights, Legal Rights.

Hand in Hand India Help in enrolling to Govt. school enrolment of the never enrolled children.

Jagaran Microfin Private Ltd Pre Primary School.

Jeevankiran Distribution of free study materials like text books, note books, bags, umbrellas, uniform, etc.

Kotalipara Development Society (KDS) Providing out-of school time back up education support.

Madura Micro Finance Limited Adult Literacy programme was given to the members.

Mahasemam Trust Children's scholarship through LIC of India.

Mass Care International Basic education imparted to out-of-school girls.

Micro Enterprises & Sustainable Projects (MESP)

Literacy drive to our borrowers.

Network of Entrepreneurship & Economic Development

Community schools covering 90% girl child by community teachers trained by NEED

People's Action for Transformation Tuition and Day Care centres.

Peoples Forum Education on Products & Grievance Redressal Mechanism, Observation of International Literacy Day.

PRAYAS-Organization for sustainable develop-ment

Encourage them to provide good education to their child and Prayas is facilitating that by giving them loan.

Purba Barasat Prerana Educational support for poor Student

Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra As a part of regular activity it is provided to students through our school at Nadia

Suryoday Micro Finance Ltd General Education covered through Social Message for Com-munity awareness Programme.

Swayamsampurna training provided School going children to Awareness genera-tion for prevention of early girl child marriage issue

Note: The list of MFIs taking up these services is not exhaustive.

Table 4.7: MFIs and Preventive Healthcare Initiatives

Name of MFI Main Preventive Healthcare Initiatives

Blaze Trust Training on Women health and epidemic diseases

Belghoria Janakalyan Samity Training on health, hygiene and sanitation.

Varam Capital Private Limited Throughout the year the entire workforce at Varam & SET were actively involved in organising various medical camps, eye camps, jute Bag training, and celebration with customer-During Republic Day % Independence Day.

Growing Opportunity Finance (India) Pvt. Ltd Through Health Camps, Cancer Awareness Training, Tobacco Awareness Training, Adolescent Girl, Child and Women Health Meetings

Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society (DBIS) Swatch, Sanitation, Vaccination

Grameen Development & Finance Pvt. Ltd. Small health camp


IMPACT Preventable diseases, malnutrition and childhood illness with support from World Vision India

Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra Periodical Health Camp

Pragathi Seva Samithi Orientation Programs conducted

BURS Organized health awareness campaign

Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre (Prayas Micro Credit)

Organised Health check-up camp for HIV at night shelters run by Prayas. People/Children attended health camps organised by organisation. Besides, Prayas is running health centre at Delhi & Assam. Organised advocacy sessions for beneficiaries for Dengue & Malaria etc.

Jeevankiran Meeting medical expenses of poor people

Hand in Hand India Medical camps organised

Welfare Services Ernakulam Medical camp

Centre for Promoting Sustainable Liveli-hood(CPSL)

Malnutrition status of children by comparing adopted vs control village.

Balajee Sewa Sansthan HIV-AIDS, TB and Tobacco control Program.

Purba Barasat Prerana Health check-up & Diabetic Awareness.

Kotalipara Development Society (KDS) Health check up, eligible couple awareness, community disease burden and preventive and curative strategies.

Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh Health check up camp

Madura Micro Finance Limited Health Camp conducted at Palani for the devotees. Separate health camp at Virudhchalam.

Peoples Forum Health Awareness Camps on Prevention of Water Borne Diseases and Observation of World AIDS Day.

Mass Care International Focused on RCH/pre-maternity care.

People's Action for Transformation Eye Camps.

Life Foundation Done by various department/agency.

Barasat Sampark Doctor’s fee, Free medicine & others for beneficiaries / members.

Utkarsh Microfinance Pvt. Ltd Conducting fortnightly polyclinics at 8 branches, Primary health-care services through mobile van service at 10 branches

Equitas Micro Finance Ltd By organized free health camps member families are helped to save on the consultation fees. Free health camps are being orga-nized through 900+ hospitals with whom we have tied up

BWDA Finance Ltd BWDA is being involved in different healthcare preventive activities for the health issues like Tuberculosis, Dhyrea through programs like Gaon Kalyan Samiti(village health and sanitation committee), Awareness meetings, Cultural events, Medical camps, Auto announcement, Wall painting, Awareness rally, Distribution of awareness pamphlets etc.,

Sampurna Training and Entrepreneurship Programme

Awareness program on health

Bal-Mahila Vikas Samiti -VAMA Asha Training was conducted in District Datia for 6-7 Module, 1, 2 & 3 Phase.

Sarvodaya Nano Finance Limited 3055 beneficiaries were participated under various health programmes.

Cashpor Micro Credit Preventive health education sessions.

Note: The list of MFIs providing these services is not exhaustive


4.4 Jagruti – An Initiative to Intensify Client Engagement and Reduce Client Attrition

2010-12 was a very difficult period for MFIs as Microfinance sector was going through a crisis. Industry was in dire need to improve responsible lending and client protection. In this direction, Grameen Koota took an initiative called “Jagruti” to intensify customer engagement and reduce customer attrition. The key objectives of the initiative was educating customer, combat fatigue of frequent meetings, enhancing social awareness among members. An in-depth interview with women borrowers was conducted to understand their contexts, their challenges and finally ‘Jagruti’ was created to connect them. “Jagruti” is a trusted friend, advisor with whom women can share their worries and disseminate information that would be value adding to women, their families and their communities.

Taking Jagruti to the Borrowers

• Themes critical to woman are shortlisted (finance, health, sanitation etc.)

• Within each theme, relevant topics are selected – child nutrition, open defecation, saving etc.

• One small letter per topic is written in a simplistic manner. Till the letters are not been repeated.

• Each letter was scrutinize and reviewed for accuracy and neutrality.

• Letter then translated into local language

• Kendra Managers trained to read the letter in an engaging manner. Letters are so simple that a literate borrower also can read.

• Letter started reaching customers every week at the end of their center meeting.

Figure 4.2: Most Recalled Themes

Mode and Channel of the Delivery

Jagruti as a tool is embedded in everyday workflow of loan disbursement. It also has the unequivocal blessing of its leaders. The delivery channel has thus led to effective and seamless scale-up of the program are across geographies. Women customers themselves are the delivery channels in many branches.

1820 20

1615

1210

7 7

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

No

. o

f G

rou

pe


Figure 4.3: Mode of Delivery

Impact Assessment of Jagruti

A study conducted on 30 groups of borrowers of 15 branches across 15 locations in 2015 revealed some positive impact of the initiatives.

• Despite differences in social –cultural profiles, occupation, place of residence and exposure time to letter Jagruti is a critical information source.

• Engaging manner in which letter is written is huge plus point.

• Jagruti is seen as an educated woman who is worldly wise and knows a lot who cared deeply about their welfare.

• Across several branches women have opened or are in process to opening the Prime Minister’s Jan-Dhan Yojana

• Women are putting away some amount of money each month. Due to better financial planning, several women in have managed to buy televisions, gas stoves, washing machines etc.

• Women are less dependent on moneylenders, as they are aware of other more viable sources of obtaining loans to meet their needs

• Members also recalled the importance of getting insurance for themselves and/or other families.

After listening to the letter, they joined the government pension scheme and following suit were their husbands, families and neighbours.

The case of Nurani Majeedi (Channagiri)

“Other women think we are smart, and come to us for advice. We often try and get new people to join our group”. “After joining the Sangha, we are active and brave. We are strong. We have knowledge and together we are brave. Therefore women approach us, when they have problems – financial, children’s education. We guide them – try and understand their problems”.

4

6

7

13

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Read by LO (Urdu speaking groups)

Largely read by LO

Both LO and literate members

Largely womenN

o.

of

Gro

up

Read by LO (Urdu

speaking groups)Largely read by LO

Both LO and literate

membersLargely women

No. of Group 4 6 7 13

Source: Grameen Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.


Box 4.1: “Microfinance and Affordable Clean Energy Access:

A Path to achieve Sustainable Development Goals”

India currently has more than 75 million households which lack adequate access to grid electricity and another 20 million underserved households which receive less than four hours of electricity in a day. While grid connectivity is expected to improve over the next 10 years, at the current rate of grid expansion, urbanization and population growth: 70-75 million households will still lack access to grid electricity by 2024. Since 90% of these households lie in rural areas, a significant reduction in the 83 million rural households who are currently not served or underserved by the grid is unlikely. It is important to understand that the same sets of households are also deprived of credit facilities which collectively hampers their growth.

With the focus on Sustainable Development Goal # 7, all key stakeholders will have to contribute effectively including Institutional investors. They will have to play a major role to scale up the collaboration of various stakeholders (like, MFI-Product manufacturer et al). Globally, $1.25 trillion investment is required by 2030, if one considers regions with great energy deficits such as South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa etc. Having said this, the future definitely looks good for the end users!

In this junction, alternative energy at affordable cost can bridge the gap. In this direction, Greenlight Planet is a for-profit social business that develops and manufactures honest, reliable solar products designed to help people living off the electric grid.

But lack of awareness, unreliability and unaffordability are key barriers for the poor people in acceptance of quality solar lanterns and home systems in India. Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) cover 40 million poor clients across 33 States/UTs in India. MFIs as partner is creating awareness and financing to their clients. On the other hand, Greenlight Planet is helping this section by getting them reliable solar products at affordable cost.

So Greenlight Planet in collaboration with MFIs is changing the lives of poor people in India who are deprived from grid electricity and contributing towards sustainable development.

Greenlight Planet Inc

Greenlight Planet Inc is a global leader in delivering honest, affordable energy to the world’s 2 billion under-electrified consumers. In the last 7 years we’ve delivered over 6 million+ solar-powered lights through close partnerships with large organizations across 40+ countries.

Courtesy: Greenlight Planet Inc


Box 4.2: Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana

Micro Units Development & Refinance Agency Limited (MUDRA) and Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) were launched on 08 April 2015 by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi. The guidelines of PMMY issued by Department of Financial Services (DFS), GOI indicated that all banks are required to lend to microenterprises engaged in manufacturing, processing, trading and service sector activities for a loan upto `10 lakh. Further, it was also advised that the loan may be given in three categories, i.e. Loan upto `50,000 under Shishu; `50,000 to `5 lakh under Kishor; and `5 lakh to `10 lakh under Tarun. Also, it was envisaged that more focus will have to be given for the Shishu category. A target of `1,22,188 crore was set for F.Y. 2015-16.

It was decided that MUDRA will monitor the progress of PMMY. The National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development (NABARD) was also advised to closely monitor the progress of RRBs, as RRBs are under supervisory domain of NABARD.

In order to make the monitoring more effective, a dedicated portal (www.mudra.org.in) was put in place to capture the data on the performance under PMMY on a weekly basis to have consolidated data of nationwide disaggregated retail transactions details, including data on new entrepreneurs, women entrepreneurs, SC/ST, Minority, MUDRA card etc. The data so collected was analyzed and reported to GOI. The progress was closely followed up with the banks for improvement, if any. A team of officers at ‘Mission Mudra’ was constituted and placed with DFS for an overall supervision and follow up of the programme on behalf of GOI.

Subsequently, it was also decided that the MUDRA loans given by MFIs also needs to be captured as most of the MFIs are MUDRA partners. Accordingly, MFIN was given the responsibility for following up with the NBFC-MFI and getting their data on the portal. Similarly, Sa-Dhan was made responsible for collecting the data and on boarding the same for the non NBFC MFIs.

In order to give a boost to the lending under PMMY, especially for Shishu category loans, a credit campaign was carried out from 1stSeptember 2015 to 2nd October 2015. The campaign culminated in mega credit camps in different locations in the country from 25th September 2015 to 02nd October 2015. In order to enhance the awareness of the programme, MUDRA carried out a month long publicity campaign, on behalf of DFS, through print media and Radio. The credit campaign resulted in lending to 22.50 lakh borrowers as against a target of 25 lakh borrowers and lent `4120 crore.

With all these efforts, the target set under PMMY for the year 2015-16 was surpassed by the end of the year.

A Brief Analysis of the Performance

The overall performance of the Yojana indicates that the target has been achieved during the year. As against the target of `122188 crore, the Banks and MFIs together have disbursed `132954.73 crore, thereby achieving 109%. The achievements by Public Sector Banks indicate a substantial credit growth in this segment. Based on the data collected from the PSBs, it was seen that the disbursement by these banks in this segment was around `33,000 crore during the 2014-15 which has recorded a growth of 70% during 2015-16. The other lending institutions have also achieved high credit growth in this segment due to the initiative of Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana.

Source: Review of performance of Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana – 2015-16


Box 4.3: Grievance Redressal Mechanism

BFIL formerly known as SKS has well established and best in class grievance redressal mechanism where member can register her query, service request and complaint through multiple channels-toll free number or in centre meeting.

This number is communicated and publicized through various channels. It is communicated during CGT (compulsory group training) for new members who are joining BFIL and is communicated during every centre meeting. It is written in Loan card and loan agreement which are possessed by the member. Detailed training on Customer Grievance Redressal is given during CPP training which is conducted annually. All these communication channels publicize not only toll free and ombudsman number but also numbers of SRO and RBI. Due to multiple channel of communication, volume of calls has subsequently increased.

CPP Awareness Calls

Overall 594779 verified member calls were received of which 86% were enquiries, 10.4% were service request and complaints were 3.6%.

Despite Increase in Call Volume by 60% abandoned rate is as low as 1% and TAT adherence

stands high at 98%.

MHL Process

Since Most of members have low literacy levels, BFIL toll free does not follow IVR based system. It’s

a unique approach, where contact numbers are tagged in system and numbers from respective

states are routed to the agents with knowledge of same language.

Most of member helpline executives are experienced staff in field operations because they have better understanding of processes, systems and customers. This provides them unique management of handling the customers.

e member addresses the issue to the Sangam Manager. He/she registers the complaint in the center register and enters a ticket No and resolves the issue within the TAT

In case the member wishes to lodge a complaint on a non-CM day or is not satis ed with the resolution provided by the Sangam Manager, she call the 1-800 Member Helpline and registers the complaint. HML Executive registers the complaint and a Ticket Number is generated while resolution is done within the TAT (member can also trace the complaint with her customer id)

If the issue is not resolved or member is not satis ed with the resolution provided by the MHL team, she raises a complaint with the Ombudsman Team which will resolve the issue within the TAT

1

2

3

CG

R

Step-3

Step-2

Step-1

ustomer

reviance

edressal


MHL Executives adheres to 3 step authentication process on every call (Name, Husband name,

Address). Post listening to customer he categorizes it as query, service request and complaint. MHL agent records it online in customer relationship management module (CRM) and it is tracked in CRM. If it is a service request or complaint it is forwarded to responsible stakeholder as per responsibility matrix. All the complaints and service request have standardized turnaround times and escalation matrix which is signed off by senior management and ombudsman. TAT and ticket number is communicated to member during registration of call. Once the Complaint/service request is resolved, concerned department informs CGR on resolution provided which in turn is communicated to the member through MHL.

If it is a service request or complaint it is forwarded to responsible stakeholder as per responsibility matrix. All the complaints and service request have standardized turnaround times and escalation matrix which is signed off by senior management and ombudsman. TAT and ticket number is communicated to member during registration of call. Once the Complaint/service request is resolved, concerned

department informs CGR on resolution provided which in turn is communicated to the member

through MHL.

In case any complaint or service request exceeds TAT it is escalated and followed up by separate team and weekly updates are shared with senior management. In case member registers a call on

ombudsman helpline it is immediately escalated to top management on priority and follows a 3

day TAT.

MHL has an independent quality team which evaluates the quality of all the calls on basis of soft skills, CPP and best business practices standards. Monthly coaching and evaluation of agents is done on

the basis of quality performance.

Courtesy: Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited formerly known as SKS


SHG Movement and its Role in Financial InclusionChapter 5

1 Source: NABARD

SHG – Bank Linkage Programme, the largest microfinance model in the world, began formally in 1992 with a set of guidelines issued by NABARD. RBI facilitated commercial banks to lend to SHGs without

collateral. Since then it has taken the shape of a movement. This chapter will present an aggregate picture of the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme and various initiatives taken up under it like the digitization of SHGs and SHGs as BCs.

The following sections present a brief overview of each aspect of the programme:

5.1 Self Help Group Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP)

Self Help Group Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) is a step to bring the “unbanked” poor into the formal banking system and to inculcate thrift and credit habits. A natural corollary is for the group members to graduate into seeking better livelihood opportunities through access to credit from financial institutions.

Key Statistics under SBLP as of March 20161

• Total number of SHGs saving-linked with banks – 79.03 lakh

• Total saving amount of SHGs linked with banks – `13691 crore

• Total number of SHGs with loan outstanding – 46.72 lakh

• Total loan amount outstanding – `57119 crore

• Total No. of SHGs credit linked during 2015-16 – 18.32 lakh

• Total Amount disbursed during 2015-16 – `37286 crore

• NPA declined by 0.59% over previous year.

SBLP Activity since Inception

Banks have been active in accepting SHGs’ savings and lending to SHGs since the early nineties. Figure 5.1 brings out the historical trend in credit linkage of SHGs.

Trend of SHGs linked to banks has remained positive since the beginning though the credit linked SHGs have witnessed a decline during the year 2010-11 and 2011-12 as a ramification of the AP crisis. The credit linkage to banks resumed a positive trend after year 2012-13 and continued in 2015-16.

Figure 5.1: Historical Trend in Credit Linkage and Bank Loan Disbursed

Source: Data compiled from various reports of NABARD

10 2 4 6 12 33 136 288 545 102218562994

44996570

8849

1225414453 14548

16534

20585

24017

27582

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

Ban

k L

oan

(`

in c

rore

)

No

. o

f S

HG

s (i

n l

akh

)

Bank Loan Amount (Rs in crore No.of SHGs (in lakh)

SHG Movement and its Role in Financial Inclusion 77

5.1.1 Savings Performance of SBLP

The SHG savings amount held by banks has been growing (Figure 5.2) except for a marginal decline in 2011-12. This is largely due to the decline in saving of SHGs in the Eastern region. As of March 2016, the banking system held SHG savings to the tune of `13691 crore which is 24% more than the previous year.

Figure 5.2: All India Trend in SHG Savings Amount Held in the Indian Banking System

Source: NABARD

Average Savings per SHG:

The average savings per SHG amount to `17324 at an all India level as of March 2016. Figure 5.3 depicts the trend in the average savings held by the banking system.

Figure 5.3: All India Trend in Average per SHG Savings held in the Banking System

Source: NABARD

61997016

6551

8217

9897

11059

13691

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Sav

ing

Am

ou

nt

(`in

cro

re)

8915 94038230

11230

1332114367

17324

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Ave

rag

e S

avin

g p

er S

HG

(`

)


Average savings per SHG have been on an increasing trend since 2011. Year 2015-16 witnessed an increase of 21% in comparison to last year. Average savings had previously witnessed a decline of 12% in 2011-12, but in the subsequent year, the decline was arrested and growth restored.

Figure 5.4 depicts the savings of SHGs as on 31 March 2016 with various Banks viz. Commercial Banks, Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks. Commercial Banks continue to play a leading role, serving 52% of total number of SHGs and accounting for 66% of the total savings by SHGs in the banking system. RRBs holding second position by serving 29% of total number of SHGs and accounting for 18% of the total savings by SHGs followed by Cooperative Banks by serving 19% of total number of SHGs and accounting for 16% of the total savings.

Figure 5.4: Savings of SHGs with Banks as on 31 March 2016

Source: NABARD

5.1.2 No of SHGs Availed Bank Loan during 2015-16

The year 2015 -16 witnessed a 10% increase in the number of SHGs availing bank loans, as evident in Figure 5.5.

Figure 5.5: No. of SHGs Availed Bank Loan during 2015-16 from the Banking System

Source: NABARD

41 23 15 79

9034

2484 2173

13691

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Commercial Bank Regional Rural Bank Cooperative Bank Total

Am

ou

nt

(`in

cro

re)

No. of SHGs (in lakhs) Saving Amount (Rs in crore)

16

12 1112

14

16

18

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

No

. o

f S

HG

ava

iled

Ban

k L

oan

s (i

n l

akh

)


Figure 5.6 shows top 10 banks in terms of savings where Andhra Bank is leading with `1838 crore, followed by State Bank of India with `1399 crore.

Figure 5.6: Top 10 Banks in Terms of Savings

Source: NABARD

Figure 5.7 depicts that the loan amount disbursed to SHGs at all India level during the year was ̀ 37286 crore which is an increase of 35% in comparison to last year.

Figure 5.7: All India Trend in Bank Loan Amount Disbursed to SHGs

Source: NABARD

1838

1399

965818

448 444 441344

236 216

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Sav

ing

Am

ou

nt

(`in

cro

re)

14859 1454816535

20585

24017

27582

37286

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Ban

k L

oan

Dis

bu

rsed

to

SH

Gs

(`in

cro

re)


Figure 5.8: Agency-wise Loan Disbursement – No. of SHGs and Loan Amount Disbursed

Source: NABARD

Maintaining the trend, Commercial Banks are leading the chart in terms of bank loans disbursed to number of SHGs and amount disbursed during 2015-16 with `25184 crore having been given out to 11.3 lakh SHGs (Figure 5.7). Commercial Banks alone account for around 68% of the total loan amount disbursed to SHGs. RRBs and Cooperative banks come in at the second and third positions with 25% and 8% respectively.

Figure 5.9: Top 10 Banks in Terms of Disbursement

11.3 4.7 2.2 18.2

25184

9164

2936

37284

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000


No. of SHGs (in Lakh) Loan Disbursed (Rs in Crore)

4580

3492

1869 1754 1677 1631 16311336 1267

962

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Sav

ing

Am

ou

nt

(`in

cro

re)

Source: NABARD

Figure 5.9 shows top 10 banks in terms of amount disbursed where Andhra Bank is leading with `4580 crores, followed by State Bank of India with `3492 crores.


Average Loan Disbursement per SHG

Figure 5.10: All India Trend in Average Bank Loan Amount Disbursed per SHG

Source: NABARD

The average loan amount disbursed per SHG has been on the increase. It was ̀ 203495 during 2015-16 across India (Figure 5.10). Average loan amount disbursed per SHG has been maintaining an increasing trend over the period of years.

5.1.3 Loan Outstanding with SHGs

The outstanding loan amount has been on an increasing trend, which demonstrates the business viability of SHG lending for banks (Figure 5.11) in these areas. In 2015-16, at an all India level, the loan outstanding amount has witnessed a growth of 11% in comparison to last year.

Figure 5.11: All India Trend in SHG Loan Outstanding in the Books of Banking System

Source: NABARD

93616

121623

144046

168732175769 169608

203495

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Ave

rag

e D

isb

urs

emen

t p

er S

HG

(`

)

2803831221

3634039375

42927

51545

57119

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Lo

an O

uts

tnd

ing

(`

in c

rore

)


Average Loan Outstanding per SHG

Figure 5.12: All India Trend in Average per SHG Loan Outstanding in the Banking System

Source: NABARD

On an average, the loan outstanding per SHG as of March 2016 is `122242 at an all India level, which is a jump of around 6%

Figure 5.13: Agency-wise Bank Loan outstanding against SHGs as on 31 March 2016

Source: NABARD

Figure 5.13 depicts the agency wise bank loans outstanding against SHGs as on 31 March 2016. Yet again, Commercial Banks lead the chart, with around 65% of total bank loans outstanding. RRBs are a distant second with 28%, followed by Cooperative banks with 7%.

26.2 14.4 6 46.6

37145

16109

3864

57118

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000


No. of SHGs (in Lakh) Loan Outstanding (Rs in Crore)

5779565224

8345588455

102273

115361122242

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Ave

rag

e O

uts

tan

din

g p

er S

HG

(`

)


Portfolio Quality

At an all India level, the NPAs of banks stood at 6.5%, with a decrease of 8% in comparison to last year.

Figure 5.14: Non Performing Asset Per Cent of SHG Loans with Banks

4.7

6.1

7 6.8 7.06.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Source: NABARD

Figure 5.15: NPAs of Banks against SHGs Loan Outstanding

Source: NABARD

Figure 5.15 throws light on Non Performing Assets of Banks against SHG loans outstanding as of 31 March 2016. It is evident that Cooperative Banks have highest NPA with 8.3%. However, they account for only 63% of total bank loans outstanding. On the contrary, Regional Rural Bank, which account for 29% of total loan outstanding, have an NPA of 6.6% while Cooperative Bank account for 8% of total loan outstanding, have an NPA of 7.8%.

Integration of credit history of individual SHG members in the Credit Bureau could be a way forward for reducing NPAs. A report from the Aditya Puri Committee highlighted the need for sharing the data of SHG members with CIBs. Furthermore, the Nachiket Mor Committee also stated the need to develop a robust legal and regulatory framework around customer data generated in various transactions (credit and payments, digital and off-line), with the objective of customer ownership of their own transactions data and

232139

106429

30053

368621

8.3 6.6 7.8 6.450

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000


Bank Loan Outstanding against SHGs (Rs in lakh) %


its use, among others, for signaling credit-worthiness and reduction of NPAs. Therefore, credit reporting systems are very important in today’s financial system; this information flow enables credit markets to function more efficiently.

5.1.4 Credit Information Reporting in Respect of Self Help Group (SHG) Members

In this endeavour, Sa-Dhan in association with PlaNet Finance (now Positive Planet) rolled out a project on building an Inclusive Credit Information Bureau (ICIB) that aims at capturing data sets of individual level SHG members. The project aims at building credit history and strengthening creditworthiness of the clients, reduction in NPAs and building transparency in the system. One of the positive outcomes of the project was that RBI came out with its notification on including SHG data on credit bureaus in two phases.

Reserve bank through its notification of January 20162 has brought the client data of Self Help Groups into the framework of Credit Information Bureaus. The major features of this notification are:

Banks shall put in place necessary systems and procedures including making necessary changes to their system software so as to be able to begin collection of the relevant information from the SHG members and reporting the required information to the CICs from 1 July 2016 ( Phase I) and 1 July 2017 (Phase II).

Banks have the option to collect and report the SHG member level data either themselves or by outsourcing it to other entities. However, banks shall follow all general instructions on outsourcing set out in DBR circular No. BP 40/21.04.158/2006-07 dated November 3, 2006 as amended from time to time to the extent applicable and shall continue to be responsible for the correctness of the data submitted by the outsourced agencies to the CICs. Banks must put in place appropriate controls to ensure the correctness of the data submitted by the entities to which it is outsourced.

The credit information relating to individual SHG members shall be collected, reported and disseminated as per the provisions of the Credit Information Companies (Regulations) Act, 2005 and the extant RBI directions on credit information reporting by banks and MFIs.

The CICs shall make the necessary changes in their systems and procedures to implement the above directions as per the timelines indicated above.

5.2 Aajeevika - National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM)

National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM) was launched by the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), Government of India in June 2011. Aided in part through investment support by the World Bank, the Mission aims at creating efficient and effective institutional platforms of the rural poor enabling them to increase household income through sustainable livelihood enhancements and improved access to financial services. NRLM has set out with an agenda to cover 7 Crore rural poor households, across 600 districts, 6000 blocks, 2.5 lakh Gram Panchayats and 6 lakh villages in the country through self-managed Self Help Groups (SHGs) and federated institutions and support them for livelihoods collectives in a period of 8 -10 years3.

There are four components of the NRLM (World Bank – Government of India project). The first component of the project is institutional and human capacity development. The objective of this component is to transform the role of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) into a provider of high quality technical assistance in the field of rural livelihoods promotion. The second component of the project is state livelihood support. The objective of this component is to support state governments in the establishment of the necessary institutional architecture for the implementation of the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM)

2 https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/notification/PDFs/C29131BD0B179E4747D099BB4F72394F5FEE.PDF3 http://aajeevika.gov.in/content/welcome-national-rural-livelihoods-mission-nrlm


activities from the state to the block level. The third component of the project is innovation and partnership support. The objective of this component is to create an institutional mechanism to identify, nurture and support innovative ideas from across the country to address the livelihood needs of the rural poor. The fourth component of the project is project implementation support. The objective of this component is to establish an effective project management unit at the national level that develops key systems and processes for coordination and management of the project and the NRLM.

According to the latest report of DAY-NRLM4, NRLM has now been rolled out across 30 States/UTs, Number of Districts with intensive blocks in NRLM States stood at 493, Number of Blocks identified for intensive approach in NRLM States is 3240, Number of Blocks where intensive implementation has commenced is 3217, Number of villages in which intensive implementation has started is 190154, Number of households mobilized into SHGs (in Lakh) is 305.4, Number of SHGs promoted (in Lakh) is 26.3, Number of Village Organizations promoted is 137060, Amount of credit mobilized through banks reached (in ` Lakh) 56197.8

The tables below indicate the present status of NRLM.

Table 5.1: Present Status of NRLM

YearTotal

SHGs

NRLM Com-

pliant SHGsNo. of Loans

Per SHG

No. of loans

% of NRLM

Compliant

SHGs

Year on Year Growth

of NRLM Compliant

SHGs (%)

2013-14 2811446 1424648 1674436 1.18 50.67

2014-15 3301885 1603147 1975072 1.23 48.55 13

2015-16 3891700 1787980 2296338 1.28 45.94 12

2016-17 4005067 1806340 2343134 1.30 45.10 1

As per NRLM, at present there are 4005067 SHGs of which NRLM compliant ones are 1806340 i.e. 45.29 % of the total SHGs. There is a growth of 1% on NRLM compliant SHGs over the previous year.

5 http://nrlm.gov.in/outerReportAction.do;jsessionid=2A5FB65BA021DBB02AC4D8585E139C9C?methodName=showIndex


BC Model and TechnologyChapter 6

6.1 Business Correspondent Model

The BC model is an innovative technology-based banking model which enables people in remote areas

of India access to formal financial institutions. In November 2009, the RBI advised banks to draw up

a road map to establish presence in every village with a population above 2000 individuals, through the

use of business correspondents and business facilitators. Apart from banking outlets, branchless banking

connectivity had been extended to 534477 villages by 31st March 2016, using banking correspondents1, a

sixteen-fold increase as compared to 31st March, 2010.

In recent years, India has witnessed a high rate of economic growth2, which has resulted in greater personal

wealth for many Indians. However, a vast section of the society is still financially excluded, meaning it does

not have access to formal financial institutions. In light of recent research that shows a strong correlation

between financial exclusion and poverty and inequality, the Indian government has made financial inclusion

an integral part of its planning strategy. But how do you spread a banking network to a huge number of

settlements at an affordable cost? In India, an effort has been made to achieve financial inclusion by using

information and communication technology through the Business Correspondent model. This chapter

discusses the model, the role of MFIs in rolling out this model and the challenges it faces.

Financial inclusion has both demand-side and supply-side issues. On the supply side, the banks need to

reach out to a wider section of society, including the poor and vulnerable. The issue here is high cost,

which can be reduced only through information and communication technology solutions. On the demand

side, the major factors are low income and low asset holdings. Due to difficulties in accessing credit, poor

people resort to their own personal savings to invest in health, education, or entrepreneurial activities. In

emergencies, their entire savings can be eroded, leaving them vulnerable. Hence, the effort is to distribute

all government social security payments through banking channels. Once people have established bank

accounts, they can deposit their government payments in the bank and also access formal credit from the

bank.

6.2 Reaching Doorsteps Through Business Correspondents

In January 2006, the Reserve Bank of India issued guidelines allowing banks to designate Business

Correspondents (BCs) to increase their outreach3. A BC is an entity that acts as a teller for the bank and

carries out a full range of transactions on behalf of the bank. BCs are paid commissions by banks for the

services they render. (In the same guidelines, the Reserve Bank of India also allowed banks to designate

Business Facilitators, which can refer the customers’ proposals or facilitate banking transactions, but are not

allowed to carry out actual transactions.) Initially, only non-governmental organizations (NGOs), micro-

finance institutions, registered nonbanking financial companies, and post offices were allowed to function

as BCs. However, now the guidelines have been expanded to include individuals, local grocery shops, and

for-profit companies. The objective of establishing the BC role was to reach all villages with populations

greater than 2,000 by March 2012, and then to reach the rest of the villages in a phased manner over three

to five years.

1 RBI Annual Report 2015 -162 www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/community-dividend/business-correspondent-model-boosts-financial-inclusion-in-india3 www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/community-dividend/business-correspondent-model-boosts-financial-inclusion-in-india

BC Model and Technology 87

6.3 Progress and Challenges

India’s financial inclusion initiative expanded its presence manifold in 2010–2016. The number of banking

outlets in villages increased from 67694 at the end of March 2010 to 586307 at the end of March 2016,

comprising 51830 branches, and 534477 through branchless mode.

Table 6.1: Financial Inclusion Plan-Summary Progress of all Banks including RRBs4

The use of the BC model has the potential to change the lives of millions of people in the remotest parts of

the country5. For poor and vulnerable people, who could not think of going to the bank, banking has come

to them. Increases in the number of bank accounts and the volume of loans and deposits in areas that use

the BC model could indicate there is now far greater awareness of banking services. Frauds and diversions

of government payments are declining as people get their social security and pension payments through

bank accounts, at their doorsteps. People no longer need to travel miles to get their pension payments. In

disasters like floods and earthquakes, the government will be able to provide financial relief at a much faster

rate and to the targeted people. Even in cases of medical emergencies, poor people who formerly had to take

out high-interest loans from money lenders to cover doctors’ bills will now have access to credit.

The BC model is being used effectively for overall community development and social empowerment.

People are benefiting from credit linkages facilitated by BCs and are becoming more self-reliant. With the

help of credit, today they are able to afford education for their children, which is changing their lives forever

Particulars

Year ended

March

2010

Year ended

March

2015

Year ended

March

2016

Progress

April’15-

March’ 16

Banking Outlets in Villages – Branches 33,378 49,571 51,830 2,259

Banking Outlets in Villages – Branchless Mode 34,316 504,142 534,477 30,335

Banking Outlets in Villages –Total 67,694 553,713 586,307 32,594

Urban Locations covered through BCs 447 96,847 102,552 5,705

Basic Savings Bank Deposit A/c through branches (No. in million) 60 210 238 28

Basic Savings Bank Deposit A/c through branches (` billion) 44 365 474 109

Basic Savings Bank Deposit A/c through BCs (No. in million) 13 188 231 43

Basic Savings Bank Deposit A/c through BCs (` billion) 11 75 164 89

BSBDA-Total (No. in million) 73 398 469 71

BSBDA Total (` billion) 55 440 638 198

OD facility availed in BSBDAs (No. in million) 0.2 8 9 1

OD facility availed in BSBDAs (` billion) 0.1 20 29 9

KCCs (No. in million) 24 43 47 4

KCCs (` billion) 1,240 4,382 5,131 749

GCC (No. in million) 1 9 11 2

GCC (` billion) 35 1,302 1,493 191

ICT-A/Cs-BC Transactions (No. in million) 26.5 477 826.8 350

ICT-A/Cs-BC Transactions (` billion) 6.9 859.8 1,686.90 827

4 RBI Annual Report 2015 -165 www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/community-dividend/business-correspondent-model-boosts-financial-inclusion-in-india


Although India’s progress on financial inclusion is considerable, it is far below the target. The shortfall is due

to several challenges that have hindered the growth of the BC model. They include:

• Operational hurdles, such as cash handling (transporting, safekeeping, etc.), irregular accounting,

frauds, and misappropriations.

• Viability issues. Despite an increasing level of awareness about the value of banking services, the

majority of no-frills accounts opened by BCs are inactive. This has raised concerns that the model

may not be viable. As a result, there is a shortage of funding for building the capacity of BCs. In

some cases, BCs have lost money, forcing them to close. In addition, expanding into unbanked

areas involves costs that banks have to absorb. If banks are not able to recover the cost for small

transactions, their ability to provide credit is limited.

• Regulatory concerns. Current regulations require BCs to complete accounting and settle cash with

bank branches within 24 hours of a transaction, which may not be possible due to the huge distances

involved.

Box 6.1: Peer-to-Peer Lending

Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending is an innovative form of crowd funding with financial returns. It involves the use of an online platform to bring lenders and borrowers together and help in mobilizing unse-cured finance. The borrower can either be an individual or a business requiring a loan. The platform enables a preliminary assessment of the borrower’s creditworthiness and collection of loan repayments. Accordingly, a fee is paid to the platform by both borrowers and lenders. Interest rates range from a flat interest rate fixed by the platform to dynamic interest rates as agreed upon by borrowers and lenders using a cost-plus model (operational costs plus margin for the platform and returns for lenders).

One of the main advantages of P2P lending for borrowers is that the rates are lower than those offered by money lenders/unorganised sector, while the lenders benefit from higher returns than those obtained from a savings account or from any other investment.

Although there has been significant growth in online lending platforms globally, there is no uniformity in the regulatory stance with regard to this sector across countries. While P2P lending platforms are banned in Japan and Israel, they are regulated as banks in France, Germany and Italy, and are exempt from any regulation in China and South Korea.

Differences in regulatory stance emanate ideologically. It is argued that regulation may stifle the growth of this nascent sector. On the other hand, proponents of regulation argue that the unregulated growth of this sector may breed unhealthy practices by market players and may, in the long-run, have systemic concerns given the susceptibility of this sector to attract high risk borrowers and also weaken the monetary policy transmission mechanism.

In India, there are currently many online P2P lending platforms and the sector has been growing at a rapid pace. The Reserve Bank released a consultation paper on P2P lending in April 2016. The paper deliberated the advantages and disadvantages of regulating P2P platforms and underscored the need to develop a balanced regulatory approach that would protect lenders and borrowers without curbing the underlying innovations. Accordingly, P2P platforms are proposed to be regulated as a separate category of NBFCs. The feedback received on the paper from various stakeholders is being examined to finalise the regulatory framework.

Source: RBI Annual Report 2015 -16


6.4 MFIs as Business Correspondents

Many MFIs are increasingly going in for a BC mode of operations as it frees them from the problems related

to accessing funds from banks and financial institutions. Data has been obtained from MFIs regarding their

BC operations. To the extent received the data is presented in the Tables below.

The MFIs which reported data had been operating as BCs of 13 banks (Table 6.2).

Table 6.2: MFIs as Banking Correspondents – No. of Saving Clients and Amount Saved

S.No. Name of the Banks Name of MFINo. of MFIs

Bank Wise No. of Saving

Clients

Bank Wise Amount Saved

(` in crore)

1 Canara Bank Blaze Trust, Bengal Women Welfare Association, SKDRDP

3 157510 25

2 Corporation Bank SKDRDP 1 977105 129

3 ICICI Bank Blaze Trust, Prayas JAC, Cashpor Micro Credit

3 240134 5

4 IDBI Light Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, SKDRDP, Bal Mahila Vikas Samiti

3 806170 207

5 IndusInd Bank Ltd. Cashpor Micro Credit 1 112848 5

6 Pragati Krishna Grameena Bank

SKDRDP 1 541680 124

7 Ratnakar Bank SKDRDP 1 91352 16

8 State Bank of India Blaze Trust, Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society, Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action.

3 47416 5

9 State Bank of Mysore SKDRDP 1 140000 21

10 Syndicate Bank SKDRDP 1 215000 80

11 Union Bank of India SKDRDP 1 625570 113

12 Vijaya Bank SKDRDP 1 89647 75

13 Yes Bank Centre For Development Orientation & Training, PRAYAS , Arth Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Disha India Micro Credit.

4 69679 67

Total 4114111 871


Table 6.3: MFIs as Banking Correspondents – No. of Loan Clients, Amount Disbursed and Amount Outstanding

S.No. Name of the Banks Name of MFINo. of MFIs

Bank Wise No. of Loan Clients

Amount of Loan

Disbursed (in crore)

Loan Amount

Outstand-ing (in crore)

1 Bank of India Gramalaya Urban and Rural Development Initiatives and Network

1 230 0.32 0.32

2 Canara Bank Asomi Finance Pvt. Ltd, Bengal Woman Welfare Society, SKDRDP

3 157510 241 202

3 Corporation Bank SKDRDP 1 977105 1051 866

4 DCB Bank Annapurna Micro Finance (P) Ltd, Peoples Forum, Pahal Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

119042 132 141

5 Edelweiss SV Creditline Pvt. Ltd. 1 119213 232

6 ICICI Bank Asomi Finance Pvt. Ltd, Cashpor Micro Credit, People's Action for Transformation.

3 34622 50 45

7 IDBI Bank Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Asomi Finance Pvt. Ltd, Bhartiya Micro Credit, Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Ltd, Jagaran Microfin Pvt. Ltd, Light Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Mahashakti Foundation, Nirantara FinAccess Pvt. Ltd, Samasta Micro finance Ltd, Sonata Finance Pvt. Ltd, Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh Rajgurunagar, Hand in Hand, Sarala Development and Microfinance Pvt. Ltd , Humana People to People India, Saija Finance Pvt. Ltd., SKDRDP, Uttrayan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Adhikar Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, Cashpor Micro Credit, Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd, People's Action for Transformation, Sakhi Samudaya Kosh, ASA International India Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Sambandh Finserve Pvt. Ltd, Samhita Community Development Services, Sreema Mahila Samity, Bal Mahila Vikas Samiti

28 1217112 1666 1553

8 IndusInd Bank Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Suryoday Micro Finance Ltd, Sonata Finance Private Limited, SV Creditline Pvt. Ltd, Utkarsh Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Cashpor Micro Credit, Samhita Community Development Services

7 587638 792 770

9 Kashi Gomti Samyut Gramin Bank

Bhartiya Micro Credit 1 3075 5.52 3.78

10 Kotak Mahindra Bank

SV Creditline Pvt. Ltd. 1 45175 81


11 MAS Financial Service Ltd.

Prayas, Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, ASA International India Microfinance Pvt. Ltd.

3 22556 47 43

12 Nirmal Ujjwal Credit Co-operative Society Ltd,

Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd 1 28564 66 57

13 Pragati Krishna Grameena Bank

SKDRDP 1 541680 871 800

14 Ratnakar Bank SKDRDP 1 91352 212 65

15 RBL Bank Nirantara FinAccess Pvt. Ltd, Sonata Finance Pvt. Ltd.

2 37331 94 82

16 Sornammal Educational Trust

Varam Capital Pvt. Ltd. 1 265 1

17 State Bank of India

Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action

1 2864 1 1

18 State Bank of Mysore

SKDRDP 1 140000 236 240

19 Swarna Pragati Housing Micro Finance

Mahashakti Foundation, Sakhi Samudaya Kosh, Gram Utthan

3 5294 54 37

20 Syndicate Bank SKDRDP 1 215000 421 265

21 Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd

Light Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. 1 13

22 Union Bank of India

Bhartiya Micro Credit, SKDRDP 2 639156 658 1020

23 Utkal Grameen Bank

Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Action

1 604

24 Vijaya Bank SKDRDP 1 89647 270 250

25 Yes Bank Centre For Development Orientation & Training, Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Limited, Humana People to People India, Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd, Mahashakti Foundation, Peoples Forum, Samasta Microfinance Ltd, Prayas, Bhartiya Micro Credit, Adhikar Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, Institute of Rural Credit and Entrepreneurship Development, Adhikar, Arth Microfinance Pvt. Ltd., G U Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Sakhi Samudaya Kosh, Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd, Samhita Community Development Services, Uttrayan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Disha India Micro Credit

19 400882 574 437

Total 5475930 7443 7191


6.5 Use of Technology in BC

The Reserve Bank of India’s guidelines regarding BCs allow flexibility to banks regarding the use of technology for financial inclusion. This has resulted in innovations to provide inexpensive and efficient technological solutions. Today a vast array of technology, including hand-held mobile devices, Internet, and mini-ATMs and kiosks, is available. However, in India there are challenges relating to electricity and Internet connectivity in remote areas. As a result, mobile phone technology has emerged as the most effective and prevalent solution. Most of the banks use General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enabled mobile-based online applications. Portable printing devices are synchronized with mobile handsets. Data are transferred to the bank’s intermediary server in real time. Internet security features include a default GPRS security check, an HTTPS-enabled database, and log-in password security check. Each of the BC’s customers is given a biometric smartcard, which makes identification easier and more secure. With the use of mobile technology, banks can reach vast geographic areas from a remote location.

Technology, innovation, and knowledge have become the key drivers of economic growth today6. A broad scan, across many industry verticals, suggests that much of the economic growth of the last decade has been facilitated by the existence of strong technology platforms.

The effective absorption and utilization of data and information is extremely important for any sector at various developmental stages. However, the importance of data management becomes more pronounced at the advent of the growth stage when an industry is expanding and diversifying rapidly. This is the state in which the Indian Microfinance industry is in today. As part of this growth stage, microfinance in India is undergoing rapid changes and discovering new challenges. Collecting money from scattered, remote clients, the cost of service delivery transactions in the “last mile”, effective information exchange at the institutional level, and effective growth management are just a few of the many challenges confronting MFIs. As a result, microfinance practitioners’ motivations to use technology interventions are the same as those for any other similar business model: technologies’ ability to speed up the flow of information and capital, automate transactions, control and analyze data, improve customer experience, reduce transaction costs, and increase efficiency and customer outreach. Technology potential has, therefore, led Microfinance stakeholders to believe that technology can have a profound impact on their operations.

As a result, technologies’ promise and potential is being explored by both technology providers and microfinance institutions. Though microfinance significantly differs in some ways from the traditional banking industry, traditional banking technologies, when applied innovatively in developing countries, have played a role in reducing costs and increasing outreach and penetration, of the microfinance model. Management Information Systems (MIS), Point of Sale technologies (POS), Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs), Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems and smart cards are among the major technologies that have entered microfinance over the years from the formal financial sector. Across the four major stakeholder groups, technology can meet the process requirements and increase general information sharing, efficiency, and lower costs.

6 Indiasearchjournal.com


Box 6.2: Cashless Project - Journey so Far

In the current scenario, the functioning of micro finance industry is such that it entails cash movement in very high volumes. This has adverse implications from a risk, efficiency and human resource perspective and is contradictiory with the government’s prime agenda of ‘Cashless India’. The associated operational risks/costs include, loss due to theft, fake currency, excess cash carrying in branch vaults insurance cost, legal expenses as well as excess man-hours invested in dealing with the operational and security concerns.

Cash handling at a large scale also compromises the operational efficiency. For instance, route planning of the branch staff is done with a view to only manage cash carrying risk. the centre meetings are scheduled keeping in mind the banking hours, wherein more than fifty percent of the time is devoted to cash counting and reconciliation, Branch staff have to visit the villages for a second time to comply with the CGT, and Pre GRT process as the same cannot be done immediately after the centre meetings due to cash carrying.

More than the financial risk and operational efficiency, the most concerning factor is the physical safety of the employees which is also at risk while they are carrying the huge volumes of cash over large distances. Moreover, complying with the security procedures, very often the staff who is at the receiving end of in cases of theft / snatching feels harassed in the routine of cross questioning by the authorities. The rise in criminal cases of theft / snatch over the past few months has had an adverse impact on the morale of the work force. The stressful work conditions are also bound to adversely impact the staff productivity. Thus, it was imperative that a permanent alternate solution is sought.

To address the problem of cash carrying, Satin Creditcare Network Limited (SCNL) in partnership with ItzCash commenced the collection from centres through closed loop prepaid cards which was piloted in Loni and Khair branches in May 2015. The project garnered huge success with a stark fall in physical cash transactions which in turn reflected well on the operational from, arresting the risks involved and bettering the transactional efficiency. The initial success derived from the pilot project encouraged the company to take this project to new heights.

One of the most challenging areas to work however was to kick start the project on a massive scale and Bihar was the state which ushered in the rising Sun of the cashless project.

Day to day challenges paved way for innovative solutions, which when implemented yielded better results. ItzCash provided a whole gamut of customer centric and innovative solutions It pioneered prepaid payment in India and also initiated the concept of digital payment solutions to the Indian consumer and business entities. Other products include the country’s first SMS based payments way back in 2006 to India’s first bank partnered open loop prepaid program with access to online as well as offline retailers and ATM, India’s first NFC based programs for government departments as well consumers. It is also differentiated as a “Phygital” brand; owing to the strong omni-channel presence across both physical and digital networks. These innovations paved a concrete path for the cashless revolution which started gaining pace across all geographical locations where Satin was currently operating. The program took a serious note of the distribution periphery while penetrating deeper in the operational locations.

ItzCash has put up a robust distribution model entailing a well-entrenched network of franchise outlets across the country comprising of more than 75000 retail touch points. The network is well poised to


roll out multiple distribution models including customised payment solutions for industries like Direct Selling, Government Payments among others. It also rolled out bank partnered open loop network branded instruments which provides access to payments both online and digital besides access back to your money through ATMs. It therefore services customers across all three segments of banked, under-banked and unbanked.

Presently we are operational in more than 260 branches across the geographies and transactions worth more than 3 crore are happening on a daily basis which are being routed through the cashless mode and we are still adding numbers on a daily basis. The average time a CSO was devoting to cash handling was approximately 1/3 of his total working time. Post implementation of the cashless project the life of CSO has now become easier with the complexities in the daily scenario of handling cash being now averted and the challenges associated with it having taken a back seat.

With the project being implemented in full scale criminal offences like theft and snatches will be completely abolished from the system rendering a very customer friendly and secured ambience for financial transactions.

Courtesy: Satin Creditcare Network Limited. and ItzCash

Annexures 95

State wise Presence of Different MFIsAnnexure 1

Name of the

States/UTsName of the MFIs

Total

No. of

MFIs in

opera-

tion.

No. of

MFIs hav-

ing head-

quarter in

same state

State

wise

District

covered

Andhra Pradesh

Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, FFSL, KBSLAB, NABARD, RASS, Sanghamithra, Spandana, AML, SML

9 1 13

Arunachal Pradesh

NEREFS, Nightingale Finvest, RGVN NE 3 0 5

Assam Ajagar, Annapurna Microfinance, Arohan, ASA International, Asomi, Deshabandhu Micro, Grameen Development &

Finance Pvt. Ltd, Janalakshmi, KDS, NEREFS, Nightingale

Finvest, Prochesta, RGVN NE, Sarala, SATRA, Ujjivan, Unacco, Uttrayan, Village Fin, YVU, SML

21 9 25

Andaman BMC, BWDA 2 0 1

Bihar Annapurna Microfinance, Arohan, ASA International, Basix, BMC, Cashpor, CDoT, CPSL, Dhosa, ESAF, Intrepid Finance, Jagaran, Janalakshmi, KDS, Margdarshak, Mass Care, NBJK, NEED, Prayas Jac, Saija, Sarala, Satin Creditcare, Seba Rahara, SKS, SMGBK, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Uttrayan, Vedika, Village Fin, Sonata, AML, SML

34 4 38

Chandigarh Satin Creditcare, Ujjivan 2 0 1

Chhattisgarh Altura, Annapurna Microfinance, Basix, Cashpor, Equitas, ESAF, Grameen Koota, Growing Opportunity, Hindusthan Microfinance, Janalakshmi, NABARD, Sambandh, Samhita, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Spandana, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Varam, People’s Forum, SML

22 0 23

Delhi Basix, BMC, Gramin Micro Credit Foundation, Janalakshmi, NEREFS, Prayas Jac, Satin Creditcare, Shikhar Microfinance, SKS, Ujjivan, Utkrash, SML

12 4 7

Goa Spandana, Ujjivan, AML 3 0 1

Gujarat Adhikar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, BMC, Disha Microfinance

Pvt. Ltd, Equitas, FFSL, Grama Vidiyal, Janalakshmi, Light

Microfinance, Namra Finance, Prayas, Saath, Satin Creditcare, Sewa Bank, Shroff, SKS, Spandana, Suryoday, Swayam Micro

Services, Ujjivan, Pahal Financial Services, AML, SML

22 9 33

Haryana Altura, Disha India, Equitas, HPPI, Janalakshmi, Margdarshak, Midland Microfin, Satin Creditcare, Shikhar Microfinance, SKS, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Sonata, Helping Nation, SML

16 2 20

Himachal Pradesh

Disha India, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Ujjivan, Utkrash 5 0 4

Jammu & Kashmir

Satin Creditcare 1 0 1

Note : Names in bold indicate that the MFI is headquartered in that state.


Jharkhand Annapurna Microfinance, Arohan, Basix, Cashpor, ESAF, HPPI, Jagaran, Janalakshmi, KDS, MESP, NABARD, NBJK, Saija, Sambandh, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Spandana, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Vedika, Village Fin, People's Forum, AML, SML

24 2 24

Karnataka Basix, BSS Mirofin, Chaitanya India Fin Credit, Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Equitas, ESAF, FFSL, Grama Vidiyal, Grameen Koota, Hand In Hand, IDF, Intrepid Finance, IRCED, Janalakshmi, KBSLAB, Madura Micro Finance, NABARD, Navachetna, Opportunity Microfinance, Prakruthi

Foundation, Rors, Samasta Microfinance, Sanghamithra,

SKDRDP, SKS, Spandana, Suryoday, Ujjivan, AML, SML, Muthoot Microfin, Nirantara FinAccess

32 14 30

Kerala Blaze Trust, ESAF, FREED, Grama Vidiyal, Impact, Jeevankiran,

Life Foundation, Madura Micro Finance, NABARD, SKDRDP, SKS, Spandana, Ujjivan,WSE, SML, Muthoot Microfin

16 5 13

Madhya Pradesh

Annapurna Microfinance, Anupama Human Economic

Development, Arth Finance, Basix, BMC, Cashpor, Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Equitas, ESAF, FFSL, Grama Vidiyal, Grameen Koota, Hand In Hand, Hindusthan Microfinance, Intrepid Finance, Janalakshmi, Lok Biradari, NABARD, Namra Finance, Prayas, Samhita, Sanghamithra, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Spandana, Suryoday, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Vama, Sonata, Swashree Mahila Sakh,People's Forum, Pahal Financial

Services, Yukti Samaj Sewa Society, AML, SML

37 6 48

Maharashtra Anik Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Annapurna Mahila,

Annapurna Microfinance, Basix, BMC, BSS Mirofin, Chaitanya India Fin Credit, Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, dMatrix, Equitas, ESAF, FFSL, G B P Nobel, Grama Vidiyal, Grameen Koota, Hand In Hand, Hindusthan Microfinance, IDF, Intrepid Finance,

IRCED, Janalakshmi, Madura Micro Finance, NABARD, Navachetna, Samasta Microfinance, Sampada, Sanghamithra, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Spandana, SSK, Suryoday, Ujjivan, Unnati

Microfin, Utkrash, Sonata, Samruddhi Welfare, People's Forum, Pahal Financial Services, Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh, AML, SML

42 13 36

Manipur Chanura Microfin, NEREFS, Unacco, VVD, YVU, WSDS

Initiate

6 5 9

Meghalaya Annapurna Microfinance, Basix, Grameen Development & Finance Pvt. Ltd, NEREFS, Nightingale Finvest, RGVN NE, Ujjivan

7 0 6

Mizoram NABARD, NEREFS, Nightingale Finvest, Unacco, WSDS Initiate, 5 0 8

Nagaland Grameen Development & Finance Pvt. Ltd, NEREFS, RGVN NE, 3 0 2

Annexures 97

Odisha Adhikar, Adhikar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Annapurna Micro-

finance, Arohan, Basix, Gram Utthan, GU Financial, Hand In Hand, Jagaran, Janalakshmi, KDS, Mahashakti, ODISHA, Sam-

bandh, SARC, SKS, SMCS, Spandana, Suryoday, Swayanshree

Mahila, The Eastern Multipurpose, Ujjivan, Village Fin, Peo-

ple's Forum, Helping Nation, AML, Prasad Foundation

27 14 31

Puducherry BWDA, Equitas, ESAF, FFSL, Grama Vidiyal, Hand In Hand, Janalakshmi, Sarvodaya Nano, SMILE, Suryoday, Ujjivan, Valar Aditi

12 0 4

Punjab Equitas, Janalakshmi, Midland Microfin, NEREFS, Satin Credit-care, SKS, SVCL, Ujjivan, Sonata

9 0 21

Rajasthan Annapurna Microfinance, Arth Finance, Basix, Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Equitas, Hand In Hand, HPPI, Janalakshmi, Light Microfinance, Matashree, Midland Microfin, PSC, Pustikar, Satin Creditcare, SKS, Suryoday, SVCL, Ujjivan, Sonata, AML, SML,

21 3 31

Sikkim Basix, RGVN NE, , Village Fin 3 0 2

Tamil Nadu Blaze Trust, BWDA, Disha Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Equitas, ESAF, FFSL, Grama Vidiyal, Grameen Koota, Growing Oppor-

tunity, Guardian, Hand In Hand, Impact, Janalakshmi, Madura

Micro Finance, Mahasemam, NABARD, Opportunity Microfi-nance, PAT, RASS, Repco Micro Finance, Rors, Samasta Mi-crofinance, Sanghamithra, Sarvodaya Nano, SMILE, Suryoday, Ujjivan, Valar Aditi, Varam, Virutcham, READ, SML, Muthoot Microfin

33 18 34

Telangana KBSLAB, NABARD, Spandana, Pragathi Seva Samithi, AML,

SML

6 5 9

Tripura Annapurna Microfinance, ASA International, Basix, KDS, NEREFS, RGVN NE, Ujjivan, Unacco, Village Fin

9 0 8

Uttarakhand Balajee Sewa, Basix, BMC, Disha India, HPPI, Janalakshmi, Margdarshak, NEREFS, Satin Creditcare, Shikhar Microfinance, SKS, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Sonata, SML

16 0 9

Uttar Pradesh ASA International, Basix, BMC, Cashpor, Disha India, Futureage

India, Gramottan Micro, HPPI, Intrepid Finance, Janalakshmi, Margdarshak, NEED, Saija, Samhita, Satin Creditcare, Shikhar Microfinance, SKS, Spandana, SVCL, Ujjivan, Utkrash, Vedika,

Sonata, AML, SML

25 10 71

West Bengal Agradut Polly Unnayan Samity, Arohan, ASA International,

Bagaria Relief Welfare, Barasat Sampark, Barasat U Prostuti, Basix, BJS, Boys' Recreation Club, BURS, BWWA, Dakshin

Budhakali, Destiny, Dhosa, DISA, ESAF, Jagaran, Janalakshmi, KDS, MESP, NABARD, Purba Barasat Prerana, Sahara Utsarga,

Sampurna, Sarala, Satin Creditcare, Seba Rahara, SKS, SMGBK,

Swayamsampurna, Ujjivan, Unacco, Uttrayan, Vedika, Village

Fin, VSSU, Bagnan Mahila, Barasat Grameen Society, Parama

Mahila Samitee, Helping Nation, Jamalpur Panchyajanya, Bar-

asast Society, Sreema Mahila Samity, AML, SML

45 32 20

Total 588


District wise Number of MFIs in OperationAnnexure 2

S.No. Name of the District

No. of

MFIs

Operating1 North 24 Parganas 222 Indore 203 South 24 Parganas 204 Kanchipuram 185 Thiruvallur 186 Shimoga 177 Nagpur 178 Coimbatore 179 Erode 1710 Patna 1611 Haveri district 1612 Jabalpur 1613 Amravati 1614 Kolhapur 1615 Vellore 1616 Kolkata 1617 Vaishali 1518 Bangalore Rural 1519 Mysore 1520 Tumkur 1521 Chhindwara 1522 Jalgaon 1523 Yavatmal 1524 Cuttack 1525 Chennai 1526 Cuddalore 1527 Salem 1528 Virudhunagar 1529 Nadia 1530 Muzaffarpur 1431 Raipur 1432 Ahmedabad 1433 Belgaum 1434 Chamarajnagar 1435 Gadag 1436 Dhar 1437 Hoshangabad 1438 Khandwa (East Nimar) 1439 Sagar 1440 Seoni 1441 Ujjain 14

42 Bhadrak 14

43 Baleswar(Balasore) 14

44 Thiruvarur 14

45 Tiruvannamalai 14

46 Thirupur 14

47 Villupuram 14

48 Bardhaman 14


No. of

MFIs

Operating49 Kamrup 13

50 Bilaspur 13

51 Durg 13

52 East Singhbhum 13

53 Dharwad 13

54 Harda 13

55 Katni 13

56 Mandla 13

57 Ratlam 13

58 Aurangabad 13

59 Latur 13

60 Pune 13

61 Dindigul 13

62 Nagapattinam 13

63 Namakkal 13

64 Pudukkottai 13

65 Samastipur 12

66 Vadodara 12

67 Hazaribag 12

68 Ranchi 12

69 Bagalkot 12

70 Bellary 12

71 Davanagere 12

72 Hassan 12

73 Gulbarga 12

74 Kolar 12

75 Bhopal 12

76 Ahmednagar 12

77 Satara 12

78 Solapur 12

79 Wardha 12

80 Bargarh (Baragarh) 12

81 Khordha 1282 Jaipur 1283 Kanyakumari 1284 Madurai 1285 Sivagangai 1286 Tirunelveli 1287 Howrah 1288 Murshidabad 1289 Gaya 1190 Nalanda 1191 Kheda 1192 Sabarkantha 1193 Bidar 1194 Chikkaballapur 1195 Chikkamagaluru 1196 Chitradurga 1197 Mandya 11

Annexures 99


No. of

MFIs

Operating98 Dewas 1199 Khargone (West Nimar) 11100 Vidisha 11101 Akola 11102 Nashik 11103 Sangli 11104 Jajapur (Jajpur) 11105 Kalahandi 11106 Sambalpur 11107 Alwar 11108 Theni 11109 Birbhum 11110 Hooghly 11111 Bhojpur 10112 Saran 10113 Rajnandgaon 10114 Bokaro 10115 Ramgarh 10116 Koppal 10117 Raichur 10118 Ramanagara 10119 Betul 10120 Mandsaur 10121 Narsinghpur 10122 Neemuch 10123 Raisen 10124 Rewa 10125 Satna 10126 Beed 10127 Osmanabad 10128 Bolangir (Balangir) 10129 Kendujhar (Keonjhar) 10130 Koraput 10131 Krishnagiri 10132 Tanjore 10133 Trichy 10134 Udham Singh Nagar 10135 Allahabad 10136 Chandauli 10137 Deoria 10138 Jaunpur district 10139 Mirzapur 10140 Varanasi 10141 Malda 10142 Uttar Dinajpur 10143 Kamrup Metropolitan 9144 Darbhanga 9145 East Champaran 9146 Katihar 9147 Purnia 9


No. of

MFIs

Operating148 Janjgir-Champa 9149 Korba 9150 Mehsana 9151 Ambala 9152 Karnal 9153 Kurukshetra 9154 Yamuna Nagar 9155 Dhanbad 9156 Kodagu 9157 Vijayapura 9158 Yadgir 9159 Ashok Nagar 9160 Burhanpur 9161 Bhandara 9162 Dhule 9163 Dhenkanal 9164 Rayagada 9165 Sundargarh (Sundergarh) 9166 Puducherry 9167 Nilgiris 9168 Dehradun 9169 Haridwar 9170 Nainital 9171 Ambedkar Nagar 9172 Gorakhpur 9173 Nagaon 8174 Sonitpur 8175 Begusarai 8176 Buxar 8177 Nawada 8178 Rohtas 8179 Mahasamund 8180 Anand 8181 Aravalli 8182 Gandhinagar 8183 Surat 8184 Dumka 8185 Giridih 8186 Bangalore Urban 8187 Barwani 8188 Chhatarpur 8189 Damoh 8190 Guna 8191 Sehore 8192 Shajapur 8193 Thane 8194 Jharsuduga 8195 Mayurbhanj 8196 Nuapada 8197 Subarnapur (Sonepur) 8



No. of

MFIs

Operating198 Pali 8199 Ariyalur 8200 Thoothukudi 8201 Agra 8202 Aligarh 8203 Bareilly 8204 Faizabad 8205 Kushinagar 8206 Lucknow 8207 Dakshin Dinajpur 8208 Medinapore (Purba) 8209 Nalbari 7210 Bhagalpur 7211 Gopalganj 7212 Khagaria 7213 Kishanganj 7214 Banaskantha 7215 Koderma 7216 Seraikela Kharsawan 7217 Uttara Kannada 7218 Alappuzha 7219 Ernakulam 7220 Kottayam 7221 Balaghat 7222 Gwalior 7223 Rajgarh 7224 Shahdol 7225 Angul 7226 Ganjam 7227 Kandhamal 7228 Nabarangpur 7229 Nayagarh 7230 Puri 7231 Patiala 7232 Bhilwara 7233 Karur 7234 Perambalur 7235 West Tripura 7236 Basti 7237 Fatehpur 7238 Ghazipur 7239 Hathras (Mahamaya Nagar) 7240 Maharajganj 7241 Mathura 7242 Saharanpur 7243 Sitapur 7244 Sultanpur 7245 Bankura 7246 Cooch Behar 7247 Medinapore (West) 7


No. of

MFIs

Operating248 Barpeta 6249 Bongaigaon 6250 Darrang 6251 Goalpara 6252 Jorhat 6253 Marigaon 6254 Aurangabad 6255 Siwan 6256 Baloda Bazar 6257 Mungeli 6258 Raigarh 6259 Bharuch 6260 Narmada 6261 Panchmahal 6262 Rewari 6263 Deoghar 6264 Dakshina Kannada 6265 Idukki 6266 Palakkad 6267 Thrissur 6268 Panna 6269 Buldhana 6270 Mumbai City 6271 Nanded 6272 Washim 6273 Imphal East 6274 East Khasi Hills 6275 Debagarh (Deogarh) 6276 Jalandhar 6277 Ludhiana 6278 Ajmer 6279 Bikaner 6280 Kota 6281 Nagaur 6282 Tuticorin 6283 Azamgarh 6284 Budaun 6285 Firozabad 6286 Ghaziabad 6287 Kaushambi 6288 Lakhimpur Kheri 6289 Mau 6290 Meerut 6291 Moradabad 6292 Sant Kabir Nagar 6293 Unnao 6294 Darjeeling 6295 Jalpaiguri 6296 Purulia 6297 Chittoor 5

Annexures 101


No. of

MFIs

Operating298 Golaghat 5299 Jehanabad 5300 Kaimur 5301 Dhamtari 5302 Surguja 5303 New Delhi 5304 North West Delhi 5305 Dahod 5306 Mahisagar 5307 Morbi 5308 Navsari 5309 Patan 5310 Valsad 5311 Hissar 5312 Kaithal 5313 Mahendragarh 5314 Palwal 5315 Panipat 5316 Rohtak 5317 Pakur 5318 West Singhbhum 5319 Pathanamthitta 5320 Thiruvananthapuram 5321 Gondia 5322 Hingoli 5323 Bishnupur 5324 Boudh (Bauda) 5325 Gajapati 5326 Bathinda 5327 Kapurthala 5328 Chittorgarh 5329 Jodhpur 5330 Sikar 5331 Dharmapuri 5332 Ramanathapura 5333 Tiruchirappalli 5334 Ballia 5335 Barabanki 5336 Bijnor 5337 Chitrakoot 5338 Gonda 5339 Hapur (Panchsheel Nagar) 5340 Hardoi 5341 Pilibhit 5342 Pratapgarh 5343 Sant Ravidas Nagar 5344 Shahjahanpur 5345 Dhemaji 4346 Dhubri 4347 Lakhimpur 4


No. of

MFIs

Operating348 Sibsagar 4349 Araria 4350 Banka 4351 West Champaran 4352 Balod 4353 Bemetara 4354 Gariaband 4355 Jashpur 4356 Koriya 4357 Surajpur 4358 West Delhi 4359 South Delhi 4360 Bhavnagar 4361 Botad 4362 Kutch 4363 Rajkot 4364 Surendranagar 4365 Tapi 4366 Bhiwani 4367 Faridabad 4368 Fatehabad 4369 Jind 4370 Sirsa 4371 Sirmaur 4372 Chatra 4373 Godda 4374 Udupi 4375 Kollam 4376 Malappuram 4377 Anuppur 4378 Dindori 4379 Shivpuri 4380 Tikamgarh 4381 Umaria 4382 Chandrapur 4383 Jalna 4384 Parbhani 4385 Sindhudurg 4386 Thoubal 4387 Aizawl 4388 Amritsar 4389 Barnala 4390 Faridkot 4391 Firozpur 4392 Mansa 4393 Moga 4394 Rupnagar (earlier Ropar) 4395 Sri Muktsar Sahib 4396 Sangrur 4397 Bundi 4



No. of

MFIs

Operating398 Churu 4399 Juhnjhunun 4400 Bahraich 4401 Banda 4402 Bulandshahr 4403 Jhansi 4404 Raebareli 4405 Rampur 4406 Sonbhadra 4407 Anantapur 3408 Cacher 3409 Dibrugarh 3410 Tinsukia 3411 Lakhisarai 3412 Munger 3413 Chandigarh 3414 Kabirdham 3415 North Delhi 3416 East Delhi 3417 Amreli 3418 Chhota Udaipur 3419 Jamnagar 3420 Gurgaon 3421 Sonipat 3422 Garhwa 3423 Jamtara 3424 Sahibganj 3425 Simdega 3426 Kozhikode 3427 Jhabua 3428 Mumbai suburban 3429 Nandurbar 3430 Palghar 3431 Raigad 3432 Senapati 3433 Imphal West 3434 Kolasib 3435 Bhubaneswar 3436 Jagatsinghpur 3437 Malkangiri 3438 Karaikal 3439 Hoshiarpur 3440 Fatehgarh Sahib 3441 Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar (ear-

lier Mohali)3

442 Shahid Bhagat Singh Na-gar (Nawan Shahr)

3

443 Baran 3444 Dausa 3445 Hanumangarh 3


No. of

MFIs

Operating446 Rajsamand 3447 Tonk 3448 Udaipur 3449 East Sikkim 3450 Mahbubnagar 3451 Khowai 3452 Amethi (Chhatrapati Shahuji

Maharaj Nagar)3

453 Hamirpur 3454 Jalaun 3455 Kanpur Dehat (Ramabai Nagar) 3456 Mahoba 3457 Muzaffarnagar 3458 Sambhal (Bheem Nagar) 3459 Siddharthnagar 3460 Krishna 2461 Nellore 2462 Prakasam 2463 Vishakhapatnam 2464 East Siang 2465 Papum Pare 2466 Baksa 2467 Chirang 2468 Udalguri 2469 North and Middle Andaman 2470 Arwal 2471 Jamui 2472 Madhepura 2473 Madhubani 2474 Saharsa 2475 Sitamarhi 2476 Dantewada 2477 Kanker 2478 Sukma 2479 North East Delhi 2480 South Goa 2481 Devbhoomi Dwarka 2482 Gir Somnath 2483 Junagadh 2484 Jhajjar 2485 Gumla 2486 Khunti 2487 Palamu 2488 Kasaragod 2489 Datia 2490 Sheopur 2491 Gadchiroli 2492 Ratnagiri 2493 Churachandpur 2494 Ukhrul 2

Annexures 103


No. of

MFIs

Operating495 East Jaintia Hills 2496 Ri-Bhoi 2497 West Garo Hills 2498 Dimapur 2499 Pathankot (New) 2500 Banswara 2501 Bharatpur 2502 Ganganagar 2503 Jaisalmer 2504 Jhalawar 2505 Sawai Madhopur 2506 Sirohi 2507 South Sikkim 2508 Ranga Reddy 2509 Warangal 2510 South Tripura 2511 Gomati 2512 Sipahijala 2513 Rudraprayag 2514 Amroha (Jyotiba Phule Nagar) 2515 Bagpat 2516 Etah 2517 Kannauj 2518 Kanpur Nagar 2519 Kasganj (Kanshi Ram Nagar) 2520 Shamli 2521 Alipurduar 2522 East Godavari 1523 Guntur 1524 Kadapa 1525 Kurnool 1526 Srikakulam 1527 Vizianagaram 1528 West Godavari 1529 Lower Subansiri 1530 West Kameng 1531 West Siang 1532 Dima Hasao 1533 Hailakandi 1534 Karbi Anglong 1535 Sheikhpura 1536 Sheohar 1537 Supaul 1538 Balrampur 1539 Dang 1540 Porbandar 1541 Panchkula 1


No. of

MFIs

Operating542 Bilaspur 1543 Kangra 1544 Una 1545 Jammu District 1546 Latehar 1547 Lohardaga 1548 Wayanad 1549 Alirajpur 1550 Bhind 1551 Sidhi 1552 Chandel 1553 Tamenglong 1554 West Jaintia Hills 1555 North Garo Hills 1556 Champhai 1557 Lawngtlai 1558 Lunglei 1559 Mamit 1560 Saiha 1561 Serchhip 1562 Kohima 1563 Kendrapara 1564 Mahe 1565 Yanam 1566 Fazilka (New) 1567 Tarn Taran 1568 Barmer 1569 Dholpur 1570 Jalore 1571 Sri Ganganagar 1572 Hyderabad 1573 Karimnagar 1574 Khammam 1575 Medak 1576 Nalgonda 1577 Nizamabad 1578 Dhalai 1579 North Tripura 1580 Unakoti 1581 Almora 1582 Champawat 1583 Garhwal 1584 Tehri Garhwal 1585 Balrampur 1586 Gautam Buddh Nagar 1587 Mainpuri 1588 Shravasti 1


Distribution of MFIs Across State and Membership Status

State Total No. of MFIsOf which No. of

Member MFIs

Of which No. of

Non-member MFIs

Andhra Pradesh 2 2 0

Assam 9 8 1

Bihar 4 2 2

Delhi 8 5 3

Gujarat 9 5 4

Haryana 2 2 0

Jharkhand 3 2 1

Karnataka 15 13 2

Kerala 5 2 3

Madhya Pradesh 6 1 5

Maharashtra 14 5 9

Manipur 4 4 0

Odisha 14 10 4

Punjab 1 1 0

Rajasthan 3 2 1

Tamil Nadu 18 14 4

Telangana 7 7 0

Uttrakhand 1 0 1

Uttar Pradesh 9 6 3

West Bengal 32 14 18

Total 166 105 61

Distribution of MFIs Across Legal Form

State Total No. of MFIsOf which No. of

Member MFIs

Of which No. of

Non-member

MFIs

NBFC 71 58 13

Local Area Bank 2 2 0

Society 49 23 26

Trust 13 7 6

Sec. 8 Company 24 11 13

MACS or Cooperative 7 4 3

Total 166 105 61

Distribution of Data Contributing MFIs for his Report

Annexure 3

Annexures 105

Note: States in bold indicate MFIs having headquarters in that state and have submitted data to BMR Report 2016.

No. of MFIs across Size (GLP Base)

Size Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP No. of MFIs Percentage (%)

Tiny < `1 Crore 13 8%

Small `1 Crore and < Rs 10 Crore 54 33%

Medium `10 Crore and < Rs 50 Crore 32 19%

Moderately Large `50 Crore and < Rs 100 Crore 14 8%

Large `100 Crore and < Rs 500 Crore 30 18%

Giant > ` 500 Crore 23 14%

Total 166

Distribution of MFIs across Region and State

Region States/Union Territtories No. of MFIs

North Delhi (8), Haryana (2), Rajasthan (3), Punjab (1), Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir

14

East Bihar (4), Odisha (14), Jharkhand (3), West Bengal (32), Andaman 53

West Gujarat (9), Maharashtra (14), Goa, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu 23

South Andhra Pradesh (2), Karnataka (15), Kerala (5),Tamil Nadu (18), Telangana (7), Puducherry

47

North East

Assam (9), Manipur (4), Tripura, Nagaland, Sikkim, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh

13

Central Madhya Pradesh (6), Uttarakhand (1), Uttar Pradesh (9), Chhattisgarh 16

Total 166


(A) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio Less than ` 1 crore

S.No. Name of the MFIs State Legal Form

1 Balajee Sewa Sansthan Uttrakhand Society

2 Barasast Society of Self Employment for Rural and All Liberal West Bengal Society

3 Barasat Unnayan Prostuti West Bengal Society

4 Deshabandhu Micro Finance and Livelihood Institution (DMLI) Assam Sec. 8 Company

5 G B P Nobel Microfinances Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company

6 Gramin Micro Credit Foundation Delhi Sec. 8 Company

7 Helping Nation Haryana Society

8 Jamalpur Panchyajanya Gram Vikash Samity West Bengal Society

9 Micro Enterpries & Suatainable Projects (MESP) Jharkhand Sec. 8 Company

10 Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre (Prayas Micro Credit) Delhi Society

11 Samruddhi Welfare Development Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company

12 Social Action for Rural Community Odisha Society

13 Yukti Samaj Sewa Society Madhya Pradesh Society

(B) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio between ` 1 and <10 crore


1 Adhikar Odisha Society

2 Agradut Polly Unnyan Samity West Bengal Society

3 Ajgar Social Circle Assam Society

4 Anik Financial Services Pvt Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

5 Anupama Human Economic Development Madhya Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

6 Bagaria Releif Welfare Ambulance Society West Bengal Society

7 Bal-Mahila Vikas Samiti -VAMA Madhya Pradesh Society

8 Barasat Grameen Society West Bengal Society

9 Barasat Sampark West Bengal Society

10 Bengal Women Welware Association West Bengal Sec. 8 Company

11 Blaze Trust Tamil Nadu Trust

12 Boy's Recreation Club West Bengal Society

13 BURS West Bengal Society

14 BWDA Finance Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC

15 Centre For Development Orientation & Training- CDOT Bihar Society

16 Centre for Promoting Sustainable Livelihood(CPSL) Bihar Society

17 Chanura Microfin Manipur Manipur Society

18 Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society (DBIS) West Bengal Society

19 Destiny Finco Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal NBFC

20 Dhosa Chandaneswar Bratyajana Samity (DCBS) West Bengal Society

Profile of MFIs which Contributed Data for this ReportAnnexure 4

Annexures 107

21 dMatrix Development Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company

22 Duttapukur Institute for Social Advancement West Bengal Society

23 Forum for Rural Environment and Economic Development Kerala Society

24 Futureage India Micro Credit Services Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

25 Gramotthan Micro Finance Company Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

26 Jeevankiran Kerala Society

27 Life Foundation Kerala Trust

28 Lok Biradari Trust Madhya Pradesh Trust

29 Mass Care International Bihar Society

30 Matashree Gomati Devi Jan Seva Nidhi Rajasthan Trust

31 Nav Bharat Jagriti Kendra Jharkhand Society

32 Opportunity Microfinance India Ltd Karnataka NBFC

33Organisation for Development Integrated Social and Health Ac-tion (ODISHA)

Odisha Society

34 Parama Mahila Samitee West Bengal Society

35 Planned Social Concern Delhi Sec. 8 Company

36 Pragathi Seva Samithi TelanganaMacs or Copera-tive

37 Prakruthi Foundation Karnataka Trust

38 Prasad Foundation Odisha Society

39 Prochesta Thrift & Credit Co-Operative Society Asom Ltd. AssamMacs or Copera-tive

40 Purba Barasat Prerana West Bengal Society

41 Pustikar Sakh Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Rajasthan Society

42 Rural Education Action and Development Tamil Nadu Society

43 Sampurna Training and Entrepreneurship Programme West Bengal Sec. 8 Company

44 SATRA Development Finance Private Limited Assam NBFC

45 Shroff Capital and Finance Pvt Ltd Gujarat NBFC-MFI

46 Swashree Mahila Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Madhya Pradesh Society

47 Swayamsampurna West Bengal Trust

48 The Eastern Multipurpose coop Society ltd. OdishaMacs or Copera-tive

49 Valar Aditi Social Finance (P) Ltd. Tamil Nadu NBFC

50 Virutcham Microfinance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

51 Vivekananda Sevakendra -O- Sishu Uddyan ( VSSU) West Bengal Society

52 Volenteers for Village Development Manipur Society

53 WSDS Initiate Manipur Society

54 YVU Financial Services Private Limited Manipur NBFC-MFI


(C) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio between ` 10 and <50 crore


1 Altura Financial Services Limited Delhi NBFC-MFI

2 Bagnan Mahila Bikash Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. West Bengal Macs or Coperative

3 Belghoria Janakalyan Samity West Bengal Society

4 Disha India Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

5 G U Financial Services Pvt Ltd Odisha NBFC

6 Gramalaya Urban and Rural Development Initiatives and Network

Tamil Nadu Sec. 8 Company

7 Grameen Development & Finance Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC-MFI

8 Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh Maharashtra Society

9 Gram-Utthan Odisha Society

10 IMPACT Tamil Nadu Sec. 8 Company

11 Institute of Rural Credit and Entrepreneurship Development Maharashtra Trust

12 Kotalipara Development Society (KDS) West Bengal Society

13 Mahashakti Foundation Odisha Trust

14 Network of Entrepreneurship & Economic Development Uttar Pradesh Society

15 Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Assam NBFC-MFI

16 People's Action for Transformation Tamil Nadu Trust

17 PRAYAS - Organization for Sustainable Development Gujarat Trust

18 RORS Finance Private Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI

19 Sahara Utsarga Welfare Society West Bengal Society

20 Sakhi Samudaya Kosh Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company

21 Sampada Entrepreneurship & Livelihoods Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company

22 Sarvodaya Nano Finance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC

23 Seba - Rahara West Bengal Society

24 Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra West Bengal Society

25 Sreema Mahila Samity West Bengal Society

26 Swayam Micro Services Gujarat Sec. 8 Company

27 Swayamshree Mahila Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Odisha Macs or Coperative

28 Swayamshree Micro Credit Services Odisha Sec. 8 Company

29 The Saath Saving and Credit Co Operative Society Limited Gujarat Macs or Coperative

30 Unacco Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Assam NBFC-MFI

31 Unnati Microfin Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

32 Welfare Services Ernakulam Kerala Society

Annexures 109

(D) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio between ` 50 and <100 crore


1 Annapurna Mahila Coop Credit Society Ltd. Maharashtra Macs or

Coperative

2 Arth MicroFinance Pvt. Ltd. Rajasthan NBFC-MFI

3 Asomi Finance Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC

4 Growing Opportunity Finance (India) Pvt Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

5 Hand in Hand India Tamil Nadu Trust

6 Humana People to People India Delhi Sec. 8 Company

7 IDF Financial Services Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC

8 Mahasemam Trust Tamil Nadu Trust

9 Navachetana Microfin Services Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC

10 Nirantara FinAccess Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI

11 Rashtriya Seva Samithi (RASS) Andhra Pradesh Society

12 Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd. Odisha NBFC-MFI

13 Shikhar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. Delhi NBFC-MFI

14 Uttrayan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal NBFC-MFI

(E) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio between ` 100 and <500 crore


1 Adhikar Micro Finance Pvt Ltd Odisha NBFC-MFI

2 ASA International India Microfinance Pvt Ltd. West Bengal NBFC-MFI

3 Bhartiya Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

4 Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd Telangana NBFC

5 BSS Microfinance Private Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI

6 Chaitanya India Fin Credit Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI

7 Disha Microfin Pvt Ltd Gujarat NBFC-MFI

8 Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

9 Intrepid Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

10 Jagaran Microfin Private Ltd West Bengal NBFC-MFI

11 Krishna Bhima Samruddhi Local Area Bank Ltd Telangana Local Area Bank

12 Light Microfinance Private Limited Gujarat NBFC-MFI

13 Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd Uttar Pradesh NBFC-MFI

14 Midland Microfin Punjab NBFC-MFI

15 Namra Finance Limited Gujarat NBFC-MFI

16 North East Region Finservices Limited Delhi NBFC

17 Pahal Financial Services Pvt Ltd Gujarat NBFC-MFI

18 Peoples Forum Odisha Society

19 Repco Microfinance limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

20 RGVN (NE) Microfinance Ltd. Assam NBFC-MFI

21 SMILE Microfinance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

22 Saija Finance Pvt Ltd Bihar NBFC-MFI

23 Samasta Microfinance Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI

24 Samhita Community Development Services Madhya Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

25 Sanghamithra Rural Financial Services Karnataka Sec. 8 Company


26 Sarala Development and Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal NBFC-MFI

27 Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd. Gujarat Local Area Bank

28 Varam Capital Private Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

29 Vedika Credit Capital Limited Jharkhand NBFC-MFI

30 Village Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal NBFC-MFI

(F) List of MFIs with Loan above ` 500 crore


1 Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt Ltd Odisha NBFC-MFI

2 Arohan Financial Services Pvt Ltd West Bengal NBFC-MFI

3 Ashmitha Microfin Ltd Telangana NBFC-MFI

4 Cashpor Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company

5 Equitas Micro Finance Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

6 ESAF Microfinance & Investments Pvt Ltd Kerala NBFC-MFI

7 Future Finacial Servicess Pvt Ltd Andhra Pradesh NBFC-MFI

8 Grama Vidiyal Micro Finance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

9 Grameen Koota Financial Services Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI

10 Janalakshmi Financial Services Ltd., Karnataka NBFC-MFI

11 Madura Micro Finance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI

12 Muthoot Microfin Limited Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

13 NABARD Financial Services Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI

14 Satin Creditcare Network Limited Delhi NBFC-MFI

15 Share Microfin Limited Telangana NBFC-MFI

16 SKDRDP dharmasthala Trust

17 SKS Microfinance Ltd Telangana NBFC-MFI

18 Sonata Finance Private Limited Uttar Pradesh NBFC-MFI

19 Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited Telangana NBFC-MFI

20 Suryoday Micro Finance Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI

21 SV Creditline Pvt. Ltd. Haryana NBFC-MFI

22 Ujjivan Financial Services Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI

23 Utkarsh Microfinance Pvt Ltd Uttar Pradesh NBFC-MFI

Data Acquisition Analytics& Report Generation by

Ardhendu Nandi

P. M. Kamalesh

Shyamasree Nandan

MAJOR ACTIVITIES

Ÿ Credit Functions: Refinance for production credit (Short Term) and investment credit (Medium and Long Term) to eligible Banks and financing institutions.

Ÿ Development Functions: To reinforce the credit functions and make credit more productive, development activities are being undertaken through

3 Research and Development Fund3 Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF)3 Farm Innovation and Promotion Fund (FIPF)3 Farmers' Technology Transfer Fund (FTTF)3 Watershed Development Fund (WDF)3 Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF)3 Tribal Development Fund (TDF)3 Cooperative Development Fund (CDF)3 Rural Innovation Fund.

Ÿ Supervisory Functions: NABARD shares with RBI certain regulatory and supervisory functions in respect of Cooperative Banks and RRBs.

Ÿ Provides consultancy services relating to Agriculture & Rural Development through NABCONS, ([email protected])

NABARD

NABARD

NABARD Head Office - Plot No. C-24, G-Block, Bandra KurlaComplex, Post Box No. 8121, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051

visit us at : www.nabard.org

Taking Rural India >> Forward

Head�Office:A�1-�248,�3rd�Floor,�Safdarjung�EnclaveNew�Delhi�‒�110029,�IndiaTel:�+�91-�11-47174400Fax:�+�91-11-47174405E-mail:�[email protected]:�www.sa-dhan.net

Registered�Office:Plot�No.�4,�2nd�FloorChandragiri�Colony�(Near�RTA�Office)Trimulgherry,�Secunderabad-500015Tel:�+91�40�40216026Telefax�:�+91�40�40037179E-mail:�[email protected]

The Bharat Microfinance - Report 2016 - Moneymint

Documents

Transcript of The Bharat Microfinance - Report 2016 - Moneymint