Social Microfinance Foundation annual report 2011
Transcript of Social Microfinance Foundation annual report 2011
3
Annual report 2011
Table of contents
Content
Abbreviations - 3
Message by the Chairman of the Board - 4
About Social Microfinance Foundation - 6
Incubation Challenge - 9
Technical Assistance in 2011 - 12
Country operations - India - 15
Country operations - The Philippines - 19
Country operations - Uganda - 23
Country operations - Ghana - 27
Representation - 29
Annual Accounts 2011 -
Independent Auditor’s Report -
Colophon -
Abbreviations
AGM - Annual General Meeting
BOD - Board of Directors
CEO - Chief Executive Officer
GNI - Gross National Income
MBA - Mutual Benefit Association
NBFC - Non-Bank Financial Company
NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation
MFI - Microfinance Institution
PHP - Philippine Peso
SACCO - Savings and Credit Co-operative
SHG - Self-Help Group
SMART - Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic, Time-Bound (indicators)
SME - Small and Medium Enterprise
SMF - Social Microfinance Foundation
TA - Technical Assistance
UGX - Uganda Shilling
USD - United States Dollar
4
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
The Year of the Incubation Challenge
By Mr. Tony Fernandes
2011 was an enervating year. In November 2010, the Promotors from Asia and Africa met with the Board
of SMF where it chose to build on the experiences of the previous year and launch the Incubation Chal-
lenge. The specifics of the Incubation Challenge were in keeping with the original
objective of the Social Microfinance Foundation to be a Technical Assistance Fa-
cility with a difference. The difference was to stimulate innovation with a visible
and tangible impact in the livelihoods of the communities of the poor in a multi-
stakeholder’s approach. The difference was in going beyond the microfinance
standardised methodology of focussing on on-lending programmes and on
growth and outreach.
This approach was indeed a Challenge that set the partnering organisations to
reflect on their approaches and come up with incubation challenges that SMF
was willing to support. This also set the Board and its two member staff on a path of working in a different
manner than it had done till now.
2011 in this sense was a year of transition. Transition from the manner in which it began to call for techni-
cal assistance proposals and the manner in which it was appraised through needs assessments and even-
tually negotiating the technical assistance to be provided from professional and well experienced TA Pro-
viders.
Implementing Incubation Challenge also triggered off a process of transition in terms of developing new
policy guidelines. It was transitioning from the process that was already in implementation to the new
process where supporting incubation challenge would be central to SMF. This generated a process of lev-
elling off in the Board and the Staff which unfortunately did not get sufficient time to round off by the end
of the year.
In this process of transitioning, one of the crucial factors was the availability of financial resources for the
coming year. SMF had made a fine start in diversifying its financial resources. Besides the major financial
contributor Cordaid, SMF was able to negotiate a collaboration with FMO which committed
€ 225.000. Oikokredit International came on board, be it with an initial modest amount of € 50.000. Two
of the Promotors, one in India, Microsave and one in the Philippines, Card made a commitment to con-
tribute modest amounts of € 15.000 each.
The levelling off process in the Board and the Staff gave a new impulse and manner of working. Part of
this process led to the search for certainties in terms of financial resources for the coming years and
thereafter. This search was not so successful since the availability of financial resources was limited.
2011 which began in an enervating manner and the launch of the Incubation Challenge ended with little
or no perspectives for the future in terms of financial resource availability.
Message by the Cha irperson
5
Annual report 2011
Message by the Cha irperson
Intensive consultations between the Board members led to the conclusion that there was no future per-
spective for SMF, however much it had to offer. A great initiative built on trust and validated by a sizeable
number of Promotors from Asia and Africa needed to be closed.
The process for closing down the Social Microfinance Foundation is now in progress and save for a mira-
cle, the decision to do so will be taken in the Board Meeting at the end of March in keeping with the Stat-
utes of the Foundation. A Transfer Agreement has been drawn up between SMF and Cordaid, that has
been kind enough to take over the roles and responsibilities of SMF that it had undergone with its part-
ners and has handed over the remaining unused amounts.
Social Microfinance Foundation in its present form will cease to exist by the middle of 2012. The experi-
ence, the lessons learnt, the incubation challenge and the determination and the will to make a difference
will continue to live.
Special thanks to all Board Members and the Staff of SMF for their time, involvement , contribution and
collaboration. Also special thanks to all the Promoting Organisations from Asia and Africa that validated
this worthwhile initiative.
Tony Fernandes,
March 2012
6
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Origin
The global microfinance sector has provided access
to financial services for millions of the poor and low-
income people.
The prospect of interesting financial returns, has
attracted social and institutional investors, keen in
supporting Microfinance Institutions. A search for
“winners” started. Well managed, profitable micro-
finance institutions were supported: MFis became
an asset class.
In March 2009, 13 international organisations, all
supporting microfinance, participated in a workshop
in Bangkok, Thailand, and analyzed their concerns
over the way the sector was evolving.
In midst of a global financial crisis taking place, they
concluded that, while advocating for a market-
driven approach to microfinance, the sector lost
focus of their main stakeholder: the poorest families
and their living context. Very high interest rates
were maintained to satisfy investors’ return require-
ments, loan products offered were inflexible and
were not addressing the needs of the poorest cli-
ents. Overindebtedness of clients had become a
serious problem in some microfinance markets. And
last but not least: environmental awareness and
biodiversity protection was absent in most microfi-
nance development strategies.
Vision and Mission
Socially –oriented Microfinance addresses access to
finance from a different perspective. It promotes
microfinance initiatives that take the social-
environmental context of clients as a starting point.
Design and delivery of financial services explicitly
integrate the social, environmental and financial
dimensions of livelihood improvement.
Socially –oriented microfinance institutions stimu-
late the active involvement and participation of cli-
ents (groups and communities). In this way they are
integrating and balancing financial and social re-
turns.
About Socia l Microf inance Foundat ion
Promotors of SMF
- Ayani
- Asian Confederation of Credit Unions (ACCU)
- AMFIU
- CARD MRI
- Cordaid
- EDA Rural Systems
- Friends of Women`s World Banking India
- MAIN Ethiopia
- Microsave Africa
- Microsave India
- Micra Indonesia
- Oikocredit
- Peace and Equity Foundation
‘Social Microfinance Foundation supports
microfinance institutions with tailor -
made technical assistance. Through a
unique approach we co-design technical
assistance projects, strengthening MFI`s
capacities through our vast network of
local consultants and experts.’
‘Social Microfinance Foundation aspires
to improve financial intermediation capa-
bilities of banks, savings and credit insti-
tutions and microfinance institutions. We
dream of an improved global financial
system, continuously seeking to provide
the poorest households with access to
savings, credit and insurance.’
7
Annual report 2011
About Socia l Microf inance Foundat ion
Organisation
Board of Directors
The highest level of governance of SMF is an inter-
national Board of Directors put together in consulta-
tion with the SMF Partner Organisations. The Board
is responsible for the Foundation’s overall strategy
and Technical Assistance policy.
In 2011, the Board was composed of six persons:
Mr. Aris Alip (CARD), Mr. David Baguma (AMFIU),
Mr. Frans Goossens (Cordaid), Mr. Tony Fernandes
(Chairperson/Treasurer), Mr. Herman Mulder
(Independent) and Mr. Ben Simmes (Secretary,
Oikocredit).
The Board has met four times, of which one meet-
ing was organised through a conference call.
Fund Management
Operations of Social Microfinance Foundation are
delegated to a Fund Manager, appointed by the
Board. He is supported by a Programme Officer. The
Fund Management team operates on the basis of
annual plans and budgets approved by the Board. It
identifies and screens eligible microfinance initia-
tives, designs and implements technical assistance
projects, and takes responsibility for financial ad-
ministration and monitoring of projects and ac-
counts.
By September 2011, the Fund Manager Jos van der
Sterren announced his resignation as per January
1st 2012. The Board of SMF decided not to hire a
new fund manager immediately.
During the year 2011, the SMF office was based in
Breda. As of January 1st 2012, the office is shifted to
Leiden.
Organisational chart
Promotor Organisations
Social Microfinance Foundation is founded by and
supported through a strong network of 13 Promotor
Organisations. These are Investors, Microfinance
Networks, international donors and consulting
companies. Their contribution to SMF is invaluable,
since they provide access to a vast local and global
network of professionals, institutions and organisa-
tions. They support the identification, orientation of
eligible projects, and provide valuable country infor-
mation.
Board of Directors
Promotor Organisations
Fund Management
Uganda
needs assessors
India
needs assessors
Ghana
needs assessors
Philippines
needs assessors
8
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
About Socia l Microf inance Foundat ion
Partnership model
Partners and Associates
Social Microfinance Foundation is a multi-
stakeholder initiative, that builds upon experience
and networks of participating organisations. Though
it is not an Association, it has many characteristics
of the same. The model is based on a partnership
with like-minded institutions that have experience
in the field of triple-bottom line finance. The SMF
statutes make a distinction between Partners and
Associates.
Partners of SMF themselves are insitutios directly
supporting microfinance initiatives who target
poorer clients and take into account the client con-
text for delivering financial services. Associates are
those that help promote the initiative, spread the
word and bring useful connections to other sectors
and initiatives (like GRI, sustainable development
discussions, responsible banking etc.).
Cooperation in 2011
In 2010, SMF network was build out of 13 official
Partner Organisations. Next to this, initial coopera-
tion started with Belgian TRIAS, in Ghana, focusing
on 15 Rural Community Banks in the Northern prov-
inces.
Rabobank Foundation India and Royal Bank of Scot-
land India both expressed its intention to collabo-
rate in exchange of information concerning India. In
due course, this could lead to actual cooperation on
project level.
With the Belgian Investor Incofin, SMF is building a
co-financed project in the Philippines. The contract
will be signed mid January 2012.
Founding Partners Acronym
Association of Microfinance
Institutions of Uganda
AMFIU
AYANI Inclusive Financial
Services Consultants
AYANI
CARD MRI CARD
EDA Rural Systems Pvt Ltd EDA
Friends of Women’s World
Banking India
FWWB
MICRA MICRA
Microfinance African
Institutions Network
MAIN
MicroSave Africa MSA
MicroSave India MSI
Oikocredit Oikocredit
Asian Confederation of
Credit Unions
ACCU
Peace and Equity Foundation PEF
Catholic Organisation of
Relief and Development Aid
CORDAID
Type of institution Based in
MFI network Uganda
TA Consulting Company Netherlands
MFI Group of service
providers
Phillippines
Specialised TA provider India
MFI Apex institution India
Specialised TA provider Indonesia
MFI network Ethiopia
Specialised TA provider Kenya and Uganda
Specialised TA provider India
Social investor The Netherlands
Confederation of
cooperatives
Thailand
MFI support institution Philippines
Intern. Private Donor
Organisation
The Netherlands
9
Annual report 2011
Changing Microfinance Sector
During the year 2011, amidst a deepening global
recession that followed the financial crisis, the
search for socially-oriented microfinance solutions
gained momentum. Globally, major microfinance
investment funds recognize the urgency of under-
standing issues like overindebtedness and more
flexible financial instruments, tailored to liveli-
hoodincome streams. Most funds also have institu-
tionalized social environmental selection and
screening policies for their investments, and recog-
nize the importance of supplying a mix of financial
and non-financial instruments to assure their invest-
ments are well spent and to avoid overindebtedness
and inappropriate targeting of clients.
Similarly, in the four countries of operation of SMF,
national governments have created facilities that
enable microfinance institutions to access local
sources of funds for technical assistance tailored to
their needs. This challenged SMF to reconsider the
added value of its operational structure, with an
international Secretariat, small project budgets,
without local presence.
While analysing this movement, the partner meet-
ing of SMF end November ‘10 decided to reposition
the TA facility, zooming into innovative approaches
to livelihood finance, and not only focusing on tech-
nical assistance to microfinance institutions, but
broadening support to incubation of new ap-
proaches in financial intermediation. As a result,
the number of interventions SMF would be support-
ing would be limited, but the role SMF would play
would be more substantial and based on long-term
partnerships with different stakeholders.
Repositioning SMF
The ‘incubation challenge’ was put into practice dur-
ing 2011, initially through the network of 13 partner
institutions. A call for proposals was issued in the
first quarter of 2011, resulting in a total of 12 pro-
posals from a diverse set of organizations India,
Zambia, Ghana and the Philippines. The content of
the proposed incubation varied: from establishing
forward and backward market linkages in agricul-
tural value chains, support of domestic fish value
chains (India), support of market outlets for micro-
entrepreneurs (Philippines), support of an innova-
tive scheme of wholesale micro-insurance systems
(Egypt) and support to the production and distribu-
tion of solar light and cooking stoves (India).
All of these proposals were discussed and reviewed
by the Board in June and September 2011 , who de-
cided to support the incubation of two initiatives: a
multi stakeholder initiative to install 200.000 solar
cookstoves in collaboration with SEWA Bank in In-
dia, and a project for establishing forward and back-
ward linkages to poor rural farmers in collaboration
with Nirantara in India.
Three other initiatives in India (floriculture produc-
tion and sales), Ghana (solar energy production and
sales) and Zambia (small scale fish production and
market linkage), where seen as promising. It was
decided that the Fund management team needed to
assess the quality of proposals and partnerships in
order to define the innovative strength and long
term sustainability of the actions. It can be stated
that the mechanism of the incubation challenge,
through a call for proposals, has lead to an encour-
aging and promising response of SMF partners in
some of the countries. However, considering the
premature stage of the two incubation initiatives,
approved at the end of 2011, it is too soon to ana-
lyze if the revised SMF strategy could be successful
in the future to push innovation and triple bottom
line finance initiatives.
Incubat ion Chal lenge
10
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Thematic focus
The main goal of the revised strategy of SMF was
twofold:
1. to stimulate innovation in triple bottom line
microfinance initiatives through incubation of
innovative approaches
2. To activate cooperation with the 13 SMF part-
ners and their valuable networks
The call for proposals issued to all the partner insti-
tutions has lead to an encouraging set of incubation
challenge initiatives:
The board has taken a pragmatic approach in receiv-
ing proposals and allowing initiatives to be pre-
sented, since it was the first time to issue the incu-
bation challenge call.
However, based on the response, during a follow up
strategic session in September, the board decided
that it would be best, with current partners, to
zoom into two thematic lines of work which could
be most relevant to SMF in the future:
1. Rural livelihood enhancement
2. Renewable energy production and distribution
Incubation project 1:
Solar cookstoves and solar lighting energy in
India (SEWA Bank)
Tällberg Foundation led the project, Rework the
World. Tällberg Foundation jointly with SEWA, IFC,
and a wider group of partners have developed an
innovative project structure to allow commercial
capital (US$22,5m in a first transaction) to be used
to finance large scale distribution and sale of
200.000 efficient stoves and 200.000 solar lanterns
to poor women in India through the SEWA mem-
bership network. To keep interest rates to the end
customers at a manageable level, the commercial
investments are backed by public guarantee capital.
This in turn is linked to social indicators so that the
guarantee is only valid if social objectives are met.
This structure thereby aligns incentives between
banks, donors, and implementing organisations,
ensuring that the best qualities from each sector are
used in a complementary way.
SMF was explicitly requested to collaborate and
bring in its expertise in the design and implementa-
tion of a social and environmental indicator matrix.
This should then be used to measure the impact of
this innovative project setup, and to convince public
and private partners to support the model, in which
private and public partners share risks and costs of
the operation.
Amount approved by board of € 25.000 in 2011 for
support in:
Design of social impact scheme;
Design of impact measurement methodology;
Incubat io n Chal lenge
Egypt National micro– insurance platform
Zambia Fishing production
India Solar cookstove production and distribution
India Jasmine flower value chain
India Forward and backward linkages in agriculture
Philippines Self governed market linkages for handicraft and micro– enterprise
Ghana Solar energy through rural banks
11
Annual report 2011
Incubation project 1I:
Forward and Backward linkages in agricul-
ture (Nirantara)
Nirantara (meaning: forever, sustainable) is a group
of Sevas (Social Enterprises for Value Added Ser-
vices), operating in Karnataka. The group consists of
both for-profit and not-for-profit legal entities
started to create triple bottom-line social impact.
Founded during 2006, the group is currently en-
gaged with more than 10,000 socio-economically
disadvantaged families in the backward districts of
Karnataka. The project, called iSAMS (an acronym
for Integrated Sustainable Agriculture Management
Solutions), drives farm solution integration to a one-
stop-shop, at the farm-gate level. It is an approach
to catalyse and incubate producer’s collectives
which provide critical services that make agriculture
on small land holdings a sustainable livelihood
proposition. This is a market-led farm-livelihood
project envisaged to provide key services in a pro-
fessional way using best of the technologies at low
cost to farmers.
Amount approved by board of € 60.000 in 2011 for
support in:
Design of linkages model
Pilot testing;
Incubat ion Chal lenge
12
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Applications
In 2011, the second year of operations for SMF, a
diverse group of microfinance initiatives contacted
the TA facility. Through the website, via e-mail or
after a personal introduction, around 30 organisa-
tions approached SMF for more information on TA
support.
Of this group of producers organisations, MFIs, co-
operatives and NGOs, 13 did actually send an official
application to SMF for TA support. For two of those
applications, SMF decided that the request did not
align with the approach of SMF. They were not fur-
ther considered for TA support. For the other 11
organisations, SMF organised a TA needs assess-
ment.
A needs assessment takes around six days and is
implemented by an independent, local and experi-
enced individual consultant. For three days, the con-
sultant talks with clients, branch staff and field staff
about the current issues they are facing. In the fol-
lowing three days, ideally the consultant speaks
with both senior management (SM) and Board of
Directors (BoD), to discuss the outcomes of the talks
in the field and with branch staff. When issues rec-
ognized in the field can be aligned with the plans
and ambitions of the SM and BoD, a draft TA plan
can be included in TA needs assessment report.
Based on this TA needs assessment report, with ob-
servations of the consultant and outcomes of the
discussions, SMF decides to continue or not with the
applying microfinance initiative. In 2011, this re-
sulted into seven approved TA trajectories by the
Board of SMF.
* 3 contracts to be signed in 2012
Ongoing projects
An overview of the projects running in 2011 shows
that SMF works together with a varying group of
organisations and Technical Assistance providers in
three different countries in 2011. The table below
presents a list of current TA projects within SMF.
In 2011, SMF has been working on establishing new
contacts in Ghana. Nevertheless, this did not yet
result in the start of new TA trajectories. The first
country chapter of this Annual Report, describes the
progress on identifying partners and consultants in
Ghana.
Applications received
Needs assessment implemented
Approved by the Board
Contract signed
Ghana 2 2 - -
India 5 4 4 2
Philppines 5 4 3 - *
Uganda 1 1 - -
Organisation Country Project # TA provider Contract
Nirantara CS India 1002 Microsave 18-10-2010
CDOT India 1004 A EDA RS 18-3-2011
CDOT India 1004 B EDA RS 18-3-2011
Svasti Found. India 1010 Microsave 2-11-2010
IDF FSPL India 1011 A Indus 22-10-2010
IDF FSPL India 1011 B EDA RS -
IDF FSPL India 1011 C MicroSave -
Care MBA Philippines 1012 A BMS 24-2-2011
Care MBA Philippines 1012 B Rimansi 9-5-2011
QPI MBA Philippines 1013 Rimansi 9-5-2011
ASKI MBA Philippines 1015 A Rimansi 31-5-2011
ASKI MBA Philippines 1015 B ASKI Inc 9-5-2011
MCDT SACCO Uganda 1022 A Microsave 19-11-2010
MCDT SACCO Uganda 1022 B MACO 3-2-2011
MED-Net Uganda 1025 A Ayani 23-2-2011
MED-Net Uganda 1025 B Ayani 23-2-2011
Technica l Ass istance in 2011
13
Annual report 2011
Technica l Ass istance in 2011
First year evaluation survey
In April 2010, Social Microfinance Foundation (SMF)
started operations as a Technical Assistance (TA)
facility for microfinance initiatives in India, The Phil-
ippines and Uganda.
For every organization, but perhaps even more for
young start-up organizations, it is of vital impor-
tance to evaluate and adjust operations where nec-
essary. In order to smoothen and fine-tune its ser-
vices, SMF consulted its TA clients. Through a survey
with both
qualitative and
quantitative
questions,
SMF’s TA cli-
ents were able
to express their
points of con-
cern, ideas and
comments. In
total, 20 applicants from the first year of operations
were approached in April 2011, of which 16 did re-
spond with a completed survey. Applicants from
whom the process was put on hold in 2010 were not
approached. Of the 16 completed surveys, six were
received from rejected applicants and ten from ac-
tual TA clients.
The 25 quantitative statements could be given a
mark from 1 (negative) to 5 (good) and scored on
average 4,8. For the five sets of questions, the aver-
age score ranged from 4,7 to 4,9.
Application & TA needs assessment
Many respondents indicated that the timeline and
progress of this process should be strongly im-
proved. It simply takes too much time from applica-
tion until the outcome of the needs assessment.
SMF sees room from improvement in terms of plan-
ning and follow up. To realize this improvement, the
availability of needs assessors is of vital importance.
The needs assessment itself in terms of plan-
ning, communication and outcome is evaluated
positively. SMF attaches great importance to de-
ploying independent and professional needs asses-
sors and is planning to expand the base of assessors
for the coming two years. The improved availability
of assessors will streamline and speed up the appli-
cation process.
Design TA package & TA providers
SMF actively promotes some level of competition in
the consultancy sector and intents to ask two or
three TA providers for technical and financial pro-
posals per request. Respondents of the survey did
not mention any striking or short comings of the
followed approach. In fact, many respondents ex-
pressed their satisfaction on the possibility to
choose between different proposals and noticed an
added value in the guidance and services offered by
SMF during this process.
Recommendations
Current microfinance partners, with whom a TA tra-
jectory is actually started, express a need for follow
up. A substantial share of the partners indicates that
they wish for a subsequent TA trajectory once the
current phase is ended.
Some respondents mention the need for a local
structure. A local coordinator would be useful in
order to organize more face-to-face contact and
guarantee a faster follow up in the application proc-
ess.
A last recommendation concerns the linkage to
funding institutions. As many microfinance partners
need funds besides the requested TA, it would be
useful if SMF could link up with providers of fund-
ing. This will help some organizations in implement-
ing the TA and maintaining a long term operational
and financial sustainability.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
India Philippines Uganda
Rejected Approved
15
Annual report 2011
2011: Rise of the Phoenix
The capitulation and resurgence of microfinance
sector in India
By Mr. Manoj Sharma, MicroSave India
2011 was undoubtedly the most difficult year for
Indian Microfinance. The regu-
latory back-lash in Andhra
Pradesh derailed the sector
and expectations of an early
turn-around were belied. In
fact, the repercussions of the
‘AP Crisis’ were felt beyond
Indian shores in Bangladesh,
Sri Lanka and elsewhere. We cannot deny that the
crisis had been building up for a while. The Social
Microfinance Foundation (SMF) was in fact estab-
lished because the stakeholders realised as early as
2006 that at least in some geographic pockets such
as India, the sector had gone off the track. The de-
sire to underline the social credentials of microfi-
nance and to support client focussed microfinance
was in a way, the motivation for SMF. Unfortu-
nately, the crash was too severe and happened too
soon for any meaningful initiative to have taken
root and to have cushioned the impact.
The lessons from 2011 have been that while the
sector in general was going through a very difficult
phase, clients, especially in Andhra Pradesh, were
also going through difficult times. A MicroSave field
research study provided very interesting insights on
clients in AP and the manner in which they were
managing their financial lives. The research study
was based on 76 sessions using participatory meth-
ods like focus group discussions, relative preference
ranking and financial sector trend analysis during
July – August, 2011 in three regions of Andhra
Pradesh (Telangana, Rayalaseema and Coastal An-
dhra) covering a total of four districts (Anantapur,
Krishna, Nizamabad and Adilabad).
Findings of the Study Client Related
• Credit sources in the absence of MFIs: In 59% ses-
sions, respondents said that they have taken loans
from moneylenders in the absence of MFIs. The
next most accessed source of credit was the Self
Help Groups (SHGs) (37%) and “daily finance com-
panies” – another form of money lenders - (29%).
• Pain points in accessing credit from alternate
sources: In 66% of the sessions, the exorbitant inter-
est rates charged by sources such as moneylenders
and daily finance corporations featured as the most
significant pain point. In as many as 41% of the ses-
sions, respondents said that loans taken from SHGs
and/or banks are often inadequate, and do not
serve the purpose. Respondents said that for loans
taken from SHGs and banks the processing time was
very high (24%). It took a minimum of one month
and maximum of six months for processing a loan.
• Coping mechanism in the absence of MFI loans:
24% of respondents who had plans for business ex-
pansion have postponed them as access to credit
had become difficult. 32% respondents had reduced
the scale of their business because of lack of access
to alternate sources of credit. In 12% of the sessions
respondents said that they sold their assets such as
house, vehicle, cattle, jewellery etc., to meet their
productive (agriculture related expenses) as well as
essential non-productive expenditure (school fees,
marriage etc.).
Findings – Service Provider Related
• SHGs: The SHG bank linkage programme, despite
its large presence, has some shortcomings, such as
delay in loan sanctioning (more than 2-3 months in
most cases), inadequate loan amounts, and no short
term credit products.
• MFIs: The repayment rate for MFI loans was very
low ranging between 6%-12%. Most of the clients
stopped repaying as other members of the group
had stopped repaying.
Country Operat ions - India
16
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
2011: Rise of the Phoenix
(continuation)
Media, local activists and influential members of the
community also played a major role in encouraging
the borrowers to default.
• Willingness to repay MFI loans: Most of the re-
spondents denied any harassment from the MFIs,
but have heard about suicide deaths attributed to
harassment by MFI staff through various media
channels. Almost 90% of the respondents said that
they were willing to repay their loans if MFIs start
disbursing fresh loans and if other members in the
community also start repaying.
• Respondents said that they liked some of features
of MFIs: Because they deliver timely loans (80%);
with the convenience of repaying principal along
with the interest (46%). In 29% of the sessions, re-
spondents said that they like the door step delivery
model of MFIs. On the other hand, MFIs’ group re-
sponsibility (46%) came out to be one of the major
dislikes for these loans. They also did not like the
inflexibility in loan repayments (39%) as they are
not given even a single day grace period when mak-
ing repayments.
The microfinance sector in India is trying to recover
from a crisis; the recovery is very slow as is to be
expected. However, some positive movement has
started and it appears that the sector may have put
the worst behind it. The silver lining is that the Mi-
crofinance Bill is expected to be enacted soon, giv-
ing a more robust regulatory framework for the sec-
tor. Indian microfinance was largely driven by bulk
lending from commercial banks to meet their statu-
tory lending targets; bank lending had dried up al-
most completely during 2011. On a positive note,
banks have once again started making bulk loans to
MFIs, albeit in smaller amounts.
The take-away from the AP crisis is that rampant
growth chasing profit and higher equity valuations is
unlikely to be sustainable. Clients cannot be forgot-
ten in pursuit of numbers and credit alone does not
fulfil the needs of the poor. Operating risks in micro-
finance can morph into regulatory / political or stra-
tegic risks and while it is relatively easy to deal with
operating level risks, once they grow, risk mitigation
becomes well nigh impossible. Also, for good or for
bad, welfare of the poor is perceived by govern-
ments as their domain; any perception of wrong
practices can bring about regulatory backlash which
is very difficult to manage.
The Indian microfinance sector will rise as the pro-
verbial phoenix and hopefully, the mistakes that
were made in India will not be repeated anywhere
else in the World. Microfinance is an important tool
to serve the poor and this overarching mission
should never be forgotten.
* Source (download at): http://www.microsave.org/sites/
default/files/research_papers What_are_Clients_doing_Post_the_AP_MFI_Crisis.pdf
Country Operat ions - India
17
Annual report 2011
Technical Assistance Projects
CDOT
Consultant: EDA RS
Total value contract: € 45.209,70
Centre for Development Orientation and Training
(CDOT) was registered as a society in 2000 under
the Societies Registration Act (1860) with the mis-
sion to uplift the economic status of the poor in Bi-
har. For the initial five years it focussed on a range
of development activities. It started microfinance
operations in 2005 by organizing 50 SHGs under the
Poorest Area Civil Society Programme (PACS) of
DFID. It adopted the JLG model for its microfinance
operations in 2007.
CDOT works in one of the poorest states in India
and provides financial as well as non-financial ser-
vices to its clients. By end-March 2011 its portfolio
had grown to over Rs6 crore (~€1 million) out-
standing with over 10,000 clients.
TA focus - Phase 1 (until November 2011)
- Human Resources
- Operational Efficiency
- Management Information System (MIS)
- Accounting Policy
TA focus - Phase 2 (until May 2012)
- HR – Learning & Development
- Strategic Management
- Market intelligence for Product Adaptation and
Development
- Livelihoods support
Outlook
After the finalization of the financial part of the first
phase of TA, SMF will continue with EDA and CDOT
in the second phase of TA. SMF has the strong focus
to continue and follow up with the implemented TA
up to now.
Nirantara CS
Consultant: MicroSave
Total value contract: € 43.405,-
Nirantara Community Services was established in
December 2006 with a mission to serve the under
privileged through the provision of socio-economic
services and to help them come out of poverty and
live a dignified life. Nirantara supports the liveli-
hoods of poor families through the provision of mi-
crofinance services. Currently, Nirantara is providing
micro-credit and micro-insurance products and ser-
vices.
MicroSave followed a field based approach to Tech-
nical Assistance (TA) delivery. The TA involves work-
ing with Nirantara teams and building the capacities
of the staff in the process.
TA focus
- Aligning HR management to Nirantara’s mission
and vision
- Market Survey for Customer Service & satisfaction
- Product development and implementation
Outlook
Nirantara, like most microfinance institutions in In-
dia, is facing difficult times for a longer period now
(more than a year). Where banks have been very
eager to lend to MFIs until half 2010, the situation
has dramatically changed now, with Banks being
very reluctant to finance even well positioned MFIs.
Nirantara has lost some client base but is lucky to
have a loyal group of clients and has managed to
survive.
Country Operat ions - India
18
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Technical Assistance Projects
Svasti Foundation
Consultant: MicroSave
Total value contract: € 31.693,-
SVASTI Foundation was conceptualized and started
by two professionals from the banking background
in January 2008 and the organization got its regis-
tration as a Section 25 Company and started its op-
erations October 2008.
SVASTI Foundation has recently acquired a Chennai
based Non Banking Finance Company (NBFC) and
intend to raise equity and transfer the entire portfo-
lio by June 2010. The entire team of SVASTI Founda-
tion would shift to the new NBFC, and SVASTI Foun-
dation will concentrate on launching the Banking
Correspondent Model as well as look at providing
health insurance and related services through the
foundation for the clients.
The institution has expressed its concern for this
institutional conversion in the middle of a strong
commercialization of the microfinance sector in In-
dia and is willing to redesign its operations towards
a more client-focused approach. The period of TA
runs from January 2011 until October 2011.
TA focus
- Governance issues related to social mission and
future strategies;
- Systems of portfolio monitoring and management;
- Systems of Human Resource Management;
- Social Performance Management systems
Outlook
Start of implementation of the TA project was de-
layed for several months, due to the microfinance
crisis that struck the capital raising process. How-
ever, when starting, the process was taken up suc-
cessfully and to satisfaction of all parties.
IDF FSPL
Consultant: Indus
Total value contract: € 73.724
IDF FSPL is an institution in which communities
through Federations of Self Help Groups take major-
ity of shares (60%) of the NBFC that was acquired in
2009. The byelaws of these SHG have been adjusted
to enable them to take shares in the NBFC. This am-
bition at the same time presents a huge challenge
for IDF governance, as the members are not always
capable of taking responsibility in governance. As
the SHG members are still not yet capable to do so,
for the moment the regional managers of districts
are chairmans of SHG federations.
IDF FSPL is operating in 10 districts of Karnataka,
serving 175.000 clients. Though Karnataka is one of
the States with most highest density in terms of mi-
crofinance actors, IDF operates with clients that are
still to large extent excluded: scheduled Caste mem-
bers count around 15% and Minority Muslim com-
munities compoese some 20% of the client base.
TA focus
- Processes of SHG Federations
- Processes of company
- Business Plans Macro and Micro level
- Review of Operational procedures, Financial Ser-
vice Delivery and Products
- Valuation of company shares
Outlook
IDF has seen its portfolio shrink due to lack of fund-
ing. Nevertheless, TA has been implemented with
INDUS according to schedule. One more trajectories
will start related to SHGs. At this moment IDF is dis-
cussion with SMF the general terms of continued
partnership.
Country Operat ions - India
19
Annual report 2011
Highlights of the Philippine Microfi-
nance Sector in 2011
By Ms. Asuncion Sebastian, Independent Consultant
The year 2011 was characterized by portfolio-at-risk
(PAR) rate higher than the previ-
ous years and tapering growth
rate. The increasing competition
in the sector has been cited an-
ecdotally to cause such trend;
however, recent studies show
that the level of competition is
not as crucial as the spread and reach of the players.
The key question now is this: are the MFIs reaching
the target poor market? There remain significant
poor areas in the country that remain underserved
and/or unreached despite the growing MFIs.
The Microfinance Council of the Philippines is at the
forefront of promoting social performance manage-
ment (SPM) in the sector, ensuring that the MFIs do
not suffer from mission drift. In 2011, 18 MFIs are
actively pursing SPM, higher than 2009’s four MFIs
reporting their SP standing to the MIX market. How-
ever, the state of SPM in the sector has yet to be
documented.
With the central bank raising the cap for microfi-
nance loans from Php150,000 to Php300,000 per
borrowers this year, more banks and commercial
players are anticipated to penetrate the microfi-
nance market. Although these players are likely to
attract microfinance clients from higher level of
poverty or the less poor segment, such move is also
projected to give the non-bank players—whose
maximum loan amount is still pegged at the old
value—some challenge in keeping their clients.
On the other hand, as a spillover effect of the 2009
Andhra Pradesh crisis, the microfinance sector in
the country also continues to take proactive stance
in preventing the occurrence of similar events.
Hence, microfinance institutions, networks, and
support organizations do active promotion of client
protection as well as research and advocacy con-
cerning over-indebtedness.
In line with the thrust, five of the biggest MFIs in the
country—Taytay sa Kauswagan Incorporated (TSKI),
Center for Agriculture and Rural Development
(CARD), Negros Women for Tomorrow Foundation
(NWTF), Ahon sa Hirap Foundation (ASHI), and ASA
Philippines—have also taken the lead in establishing
a microfinance credit bureau through Microfinance
Data Sharing System (MiDAS). The participating in-
stitutions voluntarily submit data to MiDAS, which
can be used for assessing a prospective borrower's
creditworthiness. The system is not intended to ex-
clude the defaulting microfinance clients; data on
the borrowers-at-risk at the village level (the small-
est organizational unit in the country) may be used
instead in determining a more appropriate service
or intervention to help this type of clients. Pilot runs
have been completed and the national rollout is all
set for 2012.
Consequently, related themes such as peer account-
ability, review of effectiveness of group lending as a
methodology, and areas that could possibly work
against the welfare of the microfinance clients also
gained attention in the annual sectoral conference.
Major efforts have also been devoted to advance
pricing transparency for client protection; among
them is the central bank’s Circular No. 730. This new
rule, which will take full effect in 2012, requires all
banks to charge interest based on the outstanding
balance of a loan at the beginning of an interest pe-
riod and to quote the effective interest rates of loan
products in their loan documents and marketing
materials. While the new policy aims to protect con-
sumers and promote healthy competition among
the institutions under the watch of the central bank,
it will inevitably affect the non-bank microfinance
institutions such as non-government organizations
(NGOs) and cooperatives, exerting on them pres-
sure to likewise be transparent with their rates for
them to remain competitive in the market.
Country Operat ions - The Phi l ipp ines
20
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Technical Assistance Projects
CARE MBA
CARE MBA, is a mutual benefit trust, that was or-
ganized in 2009 by ten (10) cooperatives in the
province of Quezon, Philippines. The main services
of CARE MBA is to provide life insurance indemnify-
ing in case of death or permanent disability, of
members of these savings- and credit cooperatives.
The Mutual Benefit Association is an interesting le-
gal form for Micro-Insurance, but most MBA's face
institutional challenges: They are mostly depending
on microfinance institutions for their growth. In-
creasing and diversifying their client base is not
easy, also because MBA's have limited legal options
to develop products and achieve efficient opera-
tions. Next to this, most MBAs have weak boards
and governance structures, as they are membership
based institutions.
Project A
Consultant: BMS
Total value contract: € 12.964,-
TA focus
The insurance business only may be successful if
information is accurate and timely. CARE MBA has
not yet put in place a robust information system
that captures membership data, financial and social
performance information. Also, SPM indicators for
the MBA need to be developed.
Outlook
The delivery of the program as proposed by BMS
has been religiously implemented starting with
Phase 1 known as Planning and Scoping. Phase 2
(Development), has completed the Members Infor-
mation or Profile extracted from the old system to
the new system. Reports regarding membership
can now be easily generated. Premium payments
and daily transaction reports are completed.
Project B
Consultant: Rimansi
Total value contract: € 23.594,-
TA focus
- Advocacy to cooperatives on Mutual approach to
include micro insurance
- Client education and financial literacy on micro
insurance
Outlook
The following TA results are achieved up to Decem-
ber 2011:
- Market development and member mobilization
- Basic Life Insurance Plan product enhancement
- Health Micro-insurance feasibility study/approval
of CARE MBA board
- Development of HR Manual
- Market Awareness: educate members on micro-
insurance literacy
- Training of trainers
- Member-level micro-insurance literacy sessions
Country Operat ions - The Phi l ipp ines
21
Annual report 2011
Technical Assistance Projects
Quidan Pag-Inupdanay (QPI) MBA
Consultant: Rimansi
Total value contract: € 39.209,-
(QPI MBA) was given license to operate in January
2010. It is related to Pag-inupdanay, Inc-- an MFI
operating in Negros Occidental, with particular bias
toward serving the hard-to-reach areas of the prov-
ince. This focus allows for the MBA to reach the
lower segment of the population with insurance
services. Given this, QPI MBA has great potential to
create a significant social impact in an agrarian soci-
ety where huge number of households live in pov-
erty. For QPI, improved governance and automatiz-
ing their MIS system is the main challenge.
TA focus
- Institutional Capacity Building and Strengthening
with focus on Governance and member mobiliza
tion and marketing.
- Organizational development with focus on auto
mation of operations.
Outlook
The project is relevant and important for the institu-
tional strengthening of the MBA, but the institution
is still young. Though TA works positively, member-
ship based organizations like these will have to build
in processes of continued learning, in order to man-
age the insurance funds allocated by their members
in a professional way.
ASKI MBA
ASKI MBA, was licensed to operate by the Insurance
Commission in 2006 and was organized by ASKI Inc.-
an MFI operating in Central and North Luzon . The
MFI was founded in 1986 and is a major player in
the microfinance market in The Philippines. In 2006,
ASKI Inc. decided to formalize its inhouse insurance
scheme and thus the idea of organizing an MBA was
born. However, to manage the roll out and the re-
sulting change, ASKI took a deliberate effort of a
calibrated conversion of its branches’ clients into
ASKI MBA members. This process has not been com-
pleted after almost 4 years of operation. Roughly,
ASKI MBA has covered about 40% of the current
membership base of the MFI. As the MFI grows,
ASKI MBA is given opportunity to tap larger mem-
bership base. Since its organization, however, the
conversion of ASKI Inc. members into MBA mem-
bers has been deliberately slow and the roll out has
been well managed. At the present situation there is
a need for more fast conversion of MFI members
into MBA members. The TA covers the period from
May 2011 until October 2011. A second phase will
follow under the full responsibility of SMF until May
2012.
Project A
Consultant: Rimansi
Total value contract: € 18.831,-
TA focus
- Market research
- Actuarial studies and product development
- Business planning
- Operations training and planning
- Product licensing with the Insurance Commission
- Training of key officers and staff
- Upgrading of Operating Systems
Country Operat ions - The Phi l ipp ines
22
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Technical Assistance Projects
ASKI MBA (continuation)
Outlook
RIMANSI with ASKI MBA has conducted the demand
research for a new micro-insurance product for ASKI
MBA specifically the Credit Life Insurance Plan
(CLIP). ASKI decided to expand the study to other
branches and areas where they operate, to have a
better grasp of clients’ attitude and effective de-
mand of CLIP. Series of FGDs were conducted
among 8 groups with 174 clients participated. RI-
MANSI actuary has developed the CLIP product de-
sign for ASKI MBA. Rimansi and ASKI will continue
the processes for the design and development of
micro-insurance literacy materials.
Project B
Consultant: ASKI Inc
Total value contract: € 18.327,-
TA focus
Managing information systems such as capturing
comprehensive member information, effective re-
cording and monitoring of member contributions
and generating relevant reports for the BOT and
regulators remain to be a challenge. There is a need
to upgrade its ability to effective and efficient tech-
nology on MIS solutions to better serve its mem-
bers. With the growing number of membership, effi-
cient back-up system will be also an issue. More-
over, the introduction of a new product will require
a system that will support multiple products. There
is a need for upgrading the current hardware in sup-
port of the program that is to be developed and also
to secure data.
The objective is to acquire a fully-automated MIS by
the end of June 2011, that will help ASKI MBA com-
ply with regulatory requirements, manage its per-
formance, and better claims settlement.
Country Operat ions - The Phi l ipp ines
23
Annual report 2011
Updates on the Uganda Microfinance
Sector
By Mr. Dennis Kiyimba, Ayani BV
Most Ugandans (62%) still have no access to finan-
cial services. The number of the population holding
accounts in banks is four million or
33% of the 12 million who are
bankable. Uganda’s financial sys-
tem comprises formal, semi-
formal and informal institu-
tions. The formal institutions in-
clude banks, Microfinance Deposit-taking institu-
tions (MDIs), Credit Institutions, Insurance compa-
nies, Development Banks, Pension Funds and Capi-
tal Markets. The semi informal institutions include
SACCOS and other Microfinance institutions (MFIs),
whereas the informal ones are mostly village sav-
ings and loans associations. Formal institutions are
less prominent in rural areas than urban areas and
they only serve 14% of the rural popula-
tion. Informal institutions play an important role in
the rural service provisions and serve approximately
12% of the rural population*.
Microfinance in Uganda has continued to expand
rapidly over the years and there is increasing com-
mercialization where the bigger MFIs are gradually
upgrading. Majority of the MDIs (Tier3) have sought
to become credit institutions (tier2) and still looking
at converting to commercial banks in future.
A lot more technical innovations have been pushed
into the sector including mobile banking, branchless
banking, with the biggest break through being mo-
bile money banking in scaling up microfinance.
While there is enormous achievement in the sector
there is need to be cautious about effects of the
new innovations and renewed efforts on the per-
formance of the sector also notwithstanding the
past challenges the sectors has been facing. The
areas that need to be watched closely include:
Impact of high Inflation rate on the access to
financial services and loan repayment :
The high level of inflation since second quarter 2011
(Headline inflation rate of 30.4% October,2011 and
25.4% by February 2012)** pushed the cost of
providing financial services very high. Due prices
surge for most essential commodities including fuel.
In effect this resulted into increased interest rates
throughout the financial sector (for some banks
changed from 23.5% to 28.5% by October 2011).
This is likely to have direct impact on the repay-
ments of the loans. Also there are signs of slow-
down in the lending due to scepticism by the bor-
rowers with sectors like agriculture and other pro-
duction sectors due to increased prices of input and
transportation of raw materials and finished goods/
produce as revealed by MED-Net end of year (2011)
statistics where some of good repeat borrowers
decided to take leave/rest from borrowing.
Product diversification;
While most big MFIs continue to improve their
product line-up, including savings, micro insurance
and payment services, the medium to small MFIs
continue to be affected by cost of doing business as
some are too small to benefit from the economies
scale that could accrue from investing into product
development. This has kept the small/medium MFIs
being shunned by the potential customers due to
MFI’s stagnant/limited product line-up. Hence im-
pact on the rural outreach is also limited, since most
of these customers are better attracted by more
products, like savings products other than credit.
Regulatory issues for mobile money and in-
ternal control surrounding the transactions:
Mobile money as an emerging payment system is
showing a lot success especially in the areas of loan
repayment, payments of bills, general business
transactions. This is still working well with limited
amounts of money as there is maximum limit one
can transfer or be paid (USD. 850) using mobile
money.
Country Operat ions - Uganda
24
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Updates on the Uganda Microfinance
Sector (continuation)
But as transaction amounts grow by size, there is
likely to be challenges related to high level techno-
logical fraud, and even compromised capacity for
MFIs to manage internal controls surrounding field
collections/loan repayments transactions. An exam-
ple of which could be diversion of loan repayment
to credit officer’s personal mobile phone line in-
stead of customers using the MFI’s repayment mo-
bile line.
Despite all this and with the continued focus on im-
proved policy environment, the Ugandan microfi-
nance sector continue to present great opportuni-
ties for the enhancement of improved livelihood
while supporting economic growth and develop-
ment of Uganda.
* Source: BOU statement by the Deputy Governor; while
opening of the Banking, Finance and Insurance Expo 2011
** Source: BOU inflation statistics of January-February ‘12
Country Operat ions - Uganda
25
Annual report 2011
Technical Assistance Projects
MCDT SACCO
The Micro Credit for Development and Transforma-
tion Cooperative Savings and Credit Society Ltd
(MCDT SACCO) exists with the vision to provide the
poor in Uganda with opportunities for accessing
financial services. Micro Credit Development Trust
(MCDT) the founding NGO of MCDT SACCO was
founded in 1996 by Save the Children Norway
(formerly known as Redd Barna), together with a
group of 19 Ugandan of various professionals disci-
plines. In 2007 a decision was taken by the organiza-
tion’s Annual General Meeting to hand over the
ownership of the organization to its beneficiaries.
This commenced MCDT’s transformation path from
an NGO to a regulated cooperative society which
was concluded in January 2008 when it was finally
re-registered as a Savings And Credit Cooperative
Organization (SACCO). During the transformation
period, MCDT faced a number of challenges includ-
ing a declining portfolio, contracting operations, and
a high staff turnover. Hence, the immediate task of
the organization in the post-transformation period
is to build a sustainable institution with strong gov-
ernance structures, sound financial status and high
quality operations.
Project A
Consultant: MicroSave
Total value contract: € 21.691,-
TA focus
- Updating procedures manual and process mapping
both front and back office operations.
- Staff training/sensitization on needs for/working of
savings
- Curriculum development for client trainings
Training staff on training modules for members
Outlook
Documentation of the following processes under
the major themes of (i) Group Loan Lending Pro
cedures (ii) Operations Procedures (covering back
office operations) and Finance Procedures are now
complete after the review process by MCDT. With
the training materials complete, MicroSave is cur-
rently providing support to the Field Officers as part
of the final TA item. The MicroSave consultant will
directly mentor the staff in savings training delivery
while in the field. He will also provide a detailed re-
port, showing competence levels of the Field Staff, a
catalogue of field observations and changes that will
be used to make final adjustments to the training
materials and delivery.
Project B
Consultant: MACO
Total value contract: € 15.586,-
TA Focus
- To train the current board on the strategic and
operational roles of board of directors.
- To mentor potential board members in order to
create a pool of suitable Board members.
- To update and gear the existing board manual and
procedures.
Outlook
There have been lots of challenges related to own-
ership and governance of Savings and Credit Coop-
erative Organisations (SACCOS) in Uganda. As SAC-
COs grow in their outreach, increase their assets,
increasing numbers and savings deposits, they re-
quire clear articulation of how their boards will en-
sure effective governance. Many organisations look
at governance as the board. Governance goes be-
yond the board itself.
Country Operat ions - Uganda
26
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
MCDT SACCO (continuation)
Governance is a process by which a board or com-
mittee through management, guides an institution
in the fulfilment of its mission. The challenge for
many SACCOs in Uganda is whether Board members
have been effectively guiding management for SAC-
COs to achieve their objectives. MCDT faced the
same challenge and this Technical Assistance has
gone a long way in addressing this problem it is our
hope as the providers of this Technical Assistance
that MCDT board shall be strong and provide proper
guidance to management regarding the strategic
direction for MCDT and over see management’s ef-
fort to move in this direction.
MED Net
Consultant: Ayani BV
Total value contract: € 53.531,-
The Micro Enterprise Development Network (MED-
Net), a microfinance institution operating in
Uganda, was founded in October 1996 but begun
credit operations in June 1997. It was founded by
and is affiliated to World Vision Uganda. MED-Net
exists “To provide sustainable, gender sensitive mi-
cro finance services to the economically active poor
in Uganda for the enhancement of socio economic
development.” MED-Net has a head-office at Mak-
erere-Kavule in Kampala, and currently serves her
customers through a network of 12 branches coun-
try-wide.
TA focus
- On the lower levels in the organization, staff
should be more involved in decision making and
more aware of clients needs.
- Implementation of the newly developed manuals
across the institution
Outlook
Key results to date confirm that the TA support
funded by SMF has helped MED-Net to appreciate
microfinance best practice which in turn is assisting
the institution to address the acceptance of change
being brought about by the main TA objectives/
goals.
The TA has been very instrumental in building busi-
ness minded and compliant MED-Net work force in
preparation for the upcoming transformation to be
a regulated institution.
The TA has also assisted MED-Net to improve effi-
ciency levels of the field staff that directly impact on
the improved reaching out as the institution strives
serve more economically active poor.
Country Operat ions - Uganda
27
Annual report 2011
Country Operat ions - Ghana
Ghana’s new regulation for the
microfinance sector
By Mrs. Clara Fosu-Quaye, Independent Consultant
Ghana has a peculiar microfinance terrain. It com-
prised of formal institutions the 1st tier which are
Rural & Community Banks and Savings and Loans
Companies. The semi-formal 2nd tier was repre-
sented by Credit Unions and the financial NGOs. The
Informal institutions which was the 3rd tier com-
prised of the so called money lenders , the SuSu col-
lectors and the susu companies. Almost all institu-
tions have their own APEX Associations which are
self regulated . They had their own sets of code of
conducts and also provided support in various ways
such as capacity building to their member institu-
tions.
The only institutional types that didn’t seem to have
an apex institution were the money lenders and the
susu companies also known as the Microfinance
companies . The money lenders under the law were
to register at the Police Station. The Microfinance
companies were operating illegally . They were op-
erating under the pretext of being individual susu
collectors but in an organized form. The central
bank rejected this, because they were registered as
limited liability companies and were collecting de-
posits from the public without a license from the
central bank. Except for a few disturbing incidents
there were others that seemed to serve their com-
munities very well. The number of these Microfi-
nance Companies has increased in the last five to
ten years, about more than 300 Microfinance com-
panies operate as to this date. Due to this high num-
ber, the central bank realized the need to maintain
sanity amongst this group and that their activities
needed to be reviewed and monitored. The other
issue was the fact that the financial NGOs could not
easily transform into a Savings and Loans Compa-
nies because of the capital requirement set by the
central bank and this it made it difficult for an ordi-
nary FNGO to grow beyond its NGO status.
New regulations and guidelines
The proliferation of the Microfinance companies /
Financial NGOs in the country, coupled with ineffec-
tive supervision, demanded that the financial activi-
ties should be streamlined. This considering the
important role the institutions played in bridging
the gap created by the exclusion of the less privi-
leged in mainstream financial transactions.
This precipitated the advent of the new operating
rules and guidelines for the microfinance institu-
tions announced in July 2011. In short, the new law
required that the grouping of the Non-bank financial
institutions has increased from a single tier to four
tiers. The 1st tiers are the Rural Banks and the Sav-
ings and Loans companies. The Microfinance com-
panies and credit unions now fall under the 2nd tier.
The 3rd tier comprises of money lenders and non –
deposit taking financial companies. Whereby susu
collectors, susu enterprises, individual money lend-
ers and money lending enterprises come under tier
four. The guideline mandates that Individual MFIs
are required to be a member of the umbrella body
of their kind, to merit being issued with a license
from the central bank. No equity stake will be al-
lowed for foreign partnership in the second tier or-
ganisations except for debt instruments.
Conclusion
Even though the introduction of the new law is to
bring some sanity into the sector to sieve out the
ineffective organisations. The question arises how
the central bank is going to supervise all these insti-
tutions, as the regulation and its monitoring system
is already overstretched. The apex associations who
are in the position to support the central bank are
considered as weak and will need resources in the
form of capacity building programs to equip them
for this role. However most of the microfinance in-
stitutions with very scanty documentations and no
systems, are still able to provide access to the poor.
28
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
2011: SMF in Ghana
Early 2011, SMF started to work on building a net-
work in Ghana with socially oriented microfinance
initiatives, TA providers and other various organiza-
tions active in the Ghanaian microfinance sector.
During a visit in February 2011, several organiza-
tions and individuals have been met and current
issues in the Ghanaian microfinance sector were
analyzed as well as opportunities to cooperate with
socially oriented microfinance initiatives.
From the sector analysis, it became clear that main
issues in the microfinance sector in Ghana relate to
quality of management and outreach. The sector is
very diversified and can almost be called ‘divided’,
with many small microfinance providers, the sector
goes through various developmental stages. More
recently, government realizes that more supervision
of informal types of microfinance providers is re-
quired, mainly as a consequence of weak quality of
management.
Role of SMF
AS a consequence of the above, issues of overin-
debtedness and client poaching, though perceived
as serious problems, are not tackled in a systematic
way. Institutions are more busy with managing
regular business and trying to achieve and maintain
positive returns and good quality of their portfolio
assets.
The role of SMF in this challenging context is very
much needed, but the services of technical assis-
tance requested are very much related to the regu-
lar management issues of microfinance. A redefini-
tion of the role SMF could play would be needed,
moreover because there are existing local financial
resources available for capacity building and institu-
tional strengthening of microfinance providers. MFIs
in Ghana could benefit from management oriented
technical assistance, which focuses on improving
Human Resources, credit management and field
operations.
Within the context of the incubation challenge,
some interesting initiatives have been identified,
mainly related to renewable energy and value
chains. Preferably SMF should play a distinguished
role in supporting innovative energy and pro-poor
focused projects.
Technical Assistance in 2011
A study among a group of four rural banks in North-
ern Ghana was commissioned to analyze there in-
terest in receiving TA support from SMF. All were
partners of the Belgium organization TRIAS, how-
ever limited interest was shown or either manage-
ment capacities were too limited to create a basis
for partnerships
SMF received three other proposals for technical
assistance, of which one was planned to be pre-
sented to the Board in 2012. This project focused on
the development of a Solar Energy Loan, where in-
frastructure of this product was to be developed by
TA through SMF. Unfortunately, due to the organ-
izational changes within SMF earlier discussed, this
proposal could not be put forward to the SMF
Board.
Country Operat ions - Ghana
29
Annual report 2011
Conferences
On January 27, SMF attended the Second Responsi-
ble Finance Forum, organized by the Dutch Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, the German Federal Ministry for
Economic Cooperation and Development, CGAP and
IFC. During this one-day conference, a first group of
worldwide investors signed the Principles for Inves-
tors in Inclusive Finance .
The day after the Responsible Finance Forum,
Microfinance Transparency organized the Transpar-
ent Pricing Training. During this training day, the
following points were touched upon:
- Why microfinance has been trapped into the prac
tice of non-transparent pricing
- Implications that non-transparency is having on
reputations in microfinance
- Mechanics of calculating Annual Percentage
Rates, Effective Interest Rates, and knowing the
difference between the two
- Alternative methods for transparent pricing and
helping clients make better informed decisions
- Current efforts underway to quickly shift the
microfinance industry to pricing transparency.
The Second European Research Conference on Mi-
crofinance took place in Groningen from 16th until
18th of June 2011. During this conference, PhD
students, researchers and policymakers presented
scientific and more practice based research propo-
sals and results. Empirical research focused on a
broad range of themes such as microinsurance, sa-
vings, innovative products, etc.
MicroNed, the network of Dutch Development Fi-
nance Organisations working on Microfinance, orga-
nised its Annual Meeting focusing on Impact Eviden-
ce for Microfinance. Although not a member of Mi-
croNed, SMF was present during this meeting. Both
policy makers and reserachers, renowed in the mi-
crofinance sector, gave their views on the measure-
ment and evidence of microfinance impact on po-
verty alleviation.
Just like 2010, SMF attended the Social Perfor-
mance Task Force (SPTF) Annual Meeting 2011.
This year’s meeting was held in Den Bosch and
mainly focused on drawing the Universal Social Per-
formance indicators. Plenary sessions and working
groups were organized to examine the main issues
in setting up the indicators.
For the first time, SMF attended the FAST Global
Forum, organized in Utrecht this year. The theme of
the conference was: “Pioneering Sustainable Value
Chain Finance: From Metrics to Markets”.
The forum is addressed to all those interested in
developing the effectiveness of ‘impact investment’
strategies worldwide, and those looking to explore
the important role that SME finance plays in the
success and growth of sustainable markets.
Representat ion
Social Microf inance Foundat ion
Social Microf inance Foundation
Schipholweg 105
2316 XC Leiden
The Netherlands
T: +31 71 2020308
Chamber of Commerce: 20170416
www.socialmicrofinance .org
twitter.com/TAmicrofinance