Producing deaerated water—methods, design considerations and operational implications
Transcript of Producing deaerated water—methods, design considerations and operational implications
Producing deaerated water Methods, design considerations and operational implications
John Kyle Dorton Competence Center Manager
Thermal & Process Modules
Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
• Uses of deaerated water in the brewing process
• What is and why use deaerated water
• DAW production methods
• Operational & design considerations
• Maintenance & cost of ownership
2
Agenda
Brewhouse
Mashing Lautering
Boiling Clarification Cooling
Fermentation &
yeast
handling
Propagation & storage
Thermolysing
Beer
recovery
Aeration &
pitching Fermentation & maturation
Yeast
recovery
Filtering
Blending &
carbonation
Clarification Cellar
Dewatering
De-alcoholization Packaging
Pasteurisation
Sterile filtration
Deaeration
CIP
Utility
cooling
4
Brewing process
Image courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
5
Primary uses of deaerated water
Blending
& dilution Filtering
Beer chasing
Pasteurizer
recirculating
Fermenter chasing
Wort
chasing
Mashing in
Stripping
Steam
generation
Filling
& packing
CIP
Beer
Clarification
10
Why use DAW?
Oxide degradation
+
Acid corrosion
+
Steam line
degradation
+
…
2
2 Image courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
Boiler
11
Why use DAW?
Photos sourced from http://www.gewater.com/handbook/boiler_water_systems/fig11-5.jsp (accessed October 9 ,2013);
http://www.i-chemsolution.com/boiler-water.html (accessed September 5, 2013)
Oxide degradation
+
Acid corrosion
+
Steam line
degradation
+
…
13
A bit of theory
f(pressure,
temperature,
gas partial pressure)
Henry’s law of partial pressures
p = kH ∙ c
p is the partial pressure of O2 in vapor phase
kH is Henry’s constant (Temperature dependent)
c is the concentration of O2 in liquid
Dissolved
Air
2
2 2 2
p → c
Δ pressure
t → kH → c
Δ temperature
cgas1 → clighter gas 2
Δ gas
14
Trivia: how much O2 in water?
O2 N2
Molar wgt 31.99 28.01 g∙mol-1
fpartial fraction of air 0.21 0.79
temperature 77 … F
pressure 1 … atm
kH 769.2 1639.3 atm∙mol-1∙liter
c = M∙f∙p / kH 0.0087 0.0134 g∙liter-1
Dissolved
Air
2
2 2 2
Approximately ~8.7 ppm (v/v)
Δ p
ressure
Δ t
em
pera
ture
Δ g
as
Pros Cons
Boiling Simple & easy High thermal energy use
Low DO level Risk of O2 pickup
15
Deaeration techniques
Vacuum stripping DO < 0.5 ppm High vacuum required
H2O prone to O2 pickup
Vacuum stripping DO ~ 0.5 ppm Carrier gas lost
and gas injection High energy use
Catalytic reaction Very low DO Use of H2 requires
using H2 special installation
provisions (ATEX)
Δ p
ressure
Δ t
em
pera
ture
Δ g
as
Pros Cons
Ambient stripping Robust Influenced by gas purity
while injecting CO2 or N2 DO < 0.01 ppm Affected by temperature
Low energy use
Strip gas retention (Strip gas retention)
16
Deaeration techniques
Stripping + vacuum Redundancy Strip gas lost
using CO2 or N2 DO < 0.01 ppm Moderate energy use
Sensitivity to vacuum
Ambient injection Simple Slow
using CO2 or N2 DO < 0.02 ppm Influenced by gas purity
Strip gas retention Batch production only
Δ p
ressure
Δ t
em
pera
ture
Δ g
as
Double-vessel vacuum system at ambient temperature
17
Industrial scale methods <0.05 ppm
Mass transfer through perforated trays using
low pressure steam
stripping
(desecrating heaters)
Images sourced from http://www.spx.com/en/apv/pd-mp-deaerators-derox/;
http://www.gkmoss.com/index.php/cat/deaerators/page/traydeaerators (accessed September 5, 2013)
Δ p
ressure
Δ t
em
pera
ture
Δ g
as
Mass transfer through
membranes combining
gas stripping & vacuum
& variable temperature
18
Industrial scale methods <0.01 ppm
Mass transfer through
packed vessel at
ambient pressure &
variable temperature
Top image sourced from http://www.centec.de/en/products/food-beverages/dgs-membran.html (accessed September 5, 2013);
Bottom image courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
Δ p
ressure
Δ t
em
pera
ture
Δ g
as
Gas injection into vented vessel at
ambient pressure and
temperature
19
Batch method <0.02 ppm
Images courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
Beverage applications
<0.5 ppm
21
What DO level do I need?
Beer applications
<0.02 ppm
Boiler systems
<0.01 ppm
Images courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
22
Packed vessel stripping basics
Water
feed
Stripping
gas
Ambient
stripping
vessel
(column)
DAW
Vent
Pack
elements
Fluid
distributor
• Large surface area to volume ratio
• Perforated, cross-patterned packing
• Interrupted flow paths (no bypass ports)
• Counter flow arrangement
• Stripped gas vents from top
• Stripping gas flow required is just above
the solubility level
23
Impact of gas purity on stripping
Water
feed
Stripping
gas
Ambient
stripping
vessel
(column)
DAW
Vent
CO2 34.7 Nm3/h
~0.3 Nm3/h O2
+1.7 Nm3/h CO2
+ other residuals
Purity ≥ 99.9%
Fluid
distributor
Water 8.7 ppm O2
450 hl/h, 25C
DAW ~1452 ppm CO2
~0.041 ppm O2
≥ 99.99%
Water 8.7 ppm O2
CO2
DAW ~1452 ppm CO2
~0.004 ppm O2
O2 + CO2
+ other residuals
Higher
purity
↓
Lower DO
>95% of
stripping
gas is
retained
24
Influence of stripping temperature
Water
feed
Stripping
gas
Ambient
stripping
vessel
(column)
DAW
Vent
Fluid
distributor
Stripping height
decreases …
with
increasing
temperature
21.7
19.0
17.7
14.8 14.8
24.6
21.7
19.0
14.8 14.8
43 54 77 122 162
Str
ipp
ing
he
igh
t (f
t)
Stripping temperature (F)
O2 <
0.0
2 p
pm
O2 <
0.0
5 p
pm
Design considerations
DAW
buffer
Water feed
Inlet
balance
tank Stripping
gas
Carbonation
Filter
Steam
Cooling
Stripping
column
DAW • Stripping gas
type?
• Ambient or hot? • Vessel height
constraints
• Bacteriological
treatment
• Pasteurization
or UV
• Media availability
• Additional carbonation? • High gravity blending
• DAW
cooling?
• Inlet balance tank? • Mitigate varying inlet pressure
• Need for local CIP
Pros Cons
Tailored Exacting KPIs Longer lead times
stripping vessel Specific conditions Longer commissioning
Specificity of spares
28
Tailored vs. pre-configured systems
Pre-configured Short lead times Fixed capacity intervals
stripping vessel Cost effective Condition invariance
(inlet temperature & pressure)
Commonality of spares
Images courtesy of Alfa Laval Copenhagen A/S
30
Indexed relative running costs
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Boiling Packed
vessel
stripping Ambient
pressure &
high temperature
Vacuum
+ gas
stripping High
temperature
0
Packed
vessel
stripping Ambient
pressure &
temperature
Vacuum
stripping Ambient
temperature
DAW with
0, 2 and 5 g∙l-1 CO2
5.0
Base cost
Packed vessel < 0.001 0.018 (0.015) 1.06 (0.41)
stripping 5 min 2.2 lbs (1 kg)
Ambient startup per start
pressure &
Temperature
31
Normalized utility usage (77F)
Vacuum stripping 0.014 0.035 (0.03) 1.22 (0.47)
using membranes ≤ 213 bbl (250 hl) ~25 min 66.2 lbs (30 kg)
Ambient temperature per start; startup per start
4.4 gpm (10 hl∙h-1)
sealing H2O
Batch stripping - 0.062 (0.053) 1.29 (0.5)
Start after < 2.2 lbs (1 kg)
tank is filled per start
Condition
272.7 bbl (320 hl)
2.2 hours stripping
DO ~0.02 ppm
CO2 purity 99.99%
2 g∙l-1 carbonation
Conditions
596 bbl∙h-1 (700 hl/h)
Water at 77F (25oC)
DO ~0.005 ppm
CO2 purity 99.99%
4 g∙l-1 carbonation
kW∙bbl-1
(kW∙hl-1)
Electricity
2
bbl∙bbl-1
Water
lbs∙h-1∙bbl-1
(kg∙h-1∙hl-1)
Gas
2
32
Increment for cooling & heating
DAW cooling - + 10.69 (2.67) + 0.011 (0.009)
inlet water 77F (25oC) outlet 36F (2oC)
DAW heating + 2.35 (0.91) + 12.89 (3.22) + 0.021 (0.018)
& cooling 162F (72oC) outlet 36F (2oC)
inlet water 77F (25oC) 90% regeneration
lbs∙h-1∙bbl-1
(kg∙h-1∙hl-1)
Heating (steam)
Recirculation - - + 0.028 (0.024)
of cooling media
to prevent water
freezing
kW∙bbl-1
(kW∙hl-1)
Electricity
mBTU∙h-1∙bbl-1
(kW∙hl-1)
Cooling
33
What if feed water is colder (68F)?
DAW cooling - + 8.37 (2.09) + 0.011 (0.009)
inlet water 68F (20oC) outlet 36F (2oC)
DAW heating + 2.61 (1.01) + 10.79 (2.69) + 0.021 (0.018)
& cooling 162F (72oC) outlet 36F (2oC)
inlet water 68F (20oC) 90% regeneration
lbs∙h-1∙bbl-1
(kg∙h-1∙hl-1)
Heating (steam)
kW∙bbl-1
(kW∙hl-1)
Electricity
mBTU∙h-1∙bbl-1
(kW∙hl-1)
Cooling
More heating…
but less cooling
34
Maintenance expectations
Packed vessel 3-4 Pump seal changes (annual)
stripping Valve seal changes (annual)
CO2 purity checks (≤ semi-annual)
Vacuum stripping 5-8 Vacuum pump seal changes (≤ annual)
using membranes (periodic Membrane changes (≈ 4-5 years)
increases) Valve seals changes (annual)
CO2 purity checks (≤ semi-annual)
Batch stripping 1-3 Nozzle integrity (annual)
Vessel seal (≤ semi-annual)
hrs∙year-1 Tasks
35
CIP requirements
Packed vessel Prior to start Water sterilization (> 200F, 95oC) after stop (>12 hr)
stripping ≤ Weekly Standard CIP recipe (flush–caustic–flush)
Monthly Acid cleaning
Vacuum stripping Prior to start Water sterilization (< 176F, 80oC) after stop (>12 hr)
using membranes ≥ Weekly Membrane flushing with purity CIP recipe
Batch stripping Prior to batch Standard CIP (locally mixed) (if infrequent)
Frequency Type
• Uses of deaerated water in the brewing process
• What is and why use deaerated water
• DAW production methods
• Operational & design considerations
• Maintenance & cost of ownership
37
Closing remarks
38
Ask a brewer, “why DAW?”
Stable flavour
profiles
+
Less haze
formation
+
Improved
shelf life 2 Beer