“Not in my Stable”: The Use of Distancing Discourse among Male Participants on a Brony Website
Transcript of “Not in my Stable”: The Use of Distancing Discourse among Male Participants on a Brony Website
“Not in my Stable”: The use of distancing
discourse among male participants on a
Brony website
Steven L Dashiell University of Maryland, Bal7more County
Topics in this Slide • What is a Brony? • Why Bronies? • Problem and Hypothesis • Literature • Methodology • Findings • Discussion • Limita7ons/Future Implica7ons
What is a Brony?
• Literal/inclusive defini7on • Friendship is Magic • The “average” Brony • Brony ac7vi7es • Bronies in popular culture
Why Bronies? • Past research about Bronies • Marginalized masculini7es in the hegemonic model
• Ascribed marginaliza7on vs. achieved marginaliza7on
• Inclusive masculini7es – Many Bronies self-‐iden7fy at heterosexual – S7gma based on percep7ons and stereotypes
• High level of online communica7on
Problem and Hypothesis • Sexual orienta7on called into ques7on due to interest – Backlash -‐> heterosexist responses (“I’m not gay”)
• Ques%on: To what degree do Bronies, who might perceive their sexual orienta8on called to ques8on, assert heteronorma8ve behavior during in-‐ group interac8ons
• Hypothesis: Bronies reaffirm hegemony and their sexual orienta7on through distance discourse, use of statements to present their orienta7on
Literature
• Goffman – Face saving behavior and impression management
• Anderson – masculinity presenta7on in feminized terrain
• McCormack – low and high homohysteric environments and communica7on
• Coates – masculine discourse
Methodology
• Thema7c analysis of posts on a Brony website (Reddit page).
• Examina7on of threads which specifically talk about gender & masculinity
• Search for individuals who affirm their sexual orienta7on or gender in those circumstances
Methodology (continued)
• Quan7ta7ve count of occurrences on mul7ple pages (n = 1150 comments, 6 threads)
• Examina7on of appropriateness of sexual orienta7on/gender declara7on
• Distancing discourse – superfluous use of disclaimer statements to affirm sexual orienta7on or gender before commen7ng. – Sexuality/gender not challenged – Serves as a hegemonic tool – Differs from ‘diver7ng discourse’ by intent
Discussion
• Common use of statements to affirm sexual orienta7on
• Few indica7ons where this was done in a confronta7onal way
• Oben not subtle (“As a man”, “Being heterosexual”) but not blatant (“I love boobs”)
• More oben than not preceding (or contained) in a suppor7ve statement
Limitations • Sample size – only viewed five Reddit threads • Authen7city of online respondents • Might simply be “ally” behavior driving iden7fica7on
• Moderated limita7ons of Reddit based on votes; more blatant comments might be hidden
• Who posts? Seems more gender/sexual orienta7on variable
Future Implications/ Further Study
• Need for addi7onal research on “achieved” marginal masculini7es
• Interviews/focus groups might prove useful at face-‐to-‐face mee7ngs (BronyCon)
• Examina7on of heterosexism in Brony and Geek communi7es
Acknowledgements
• Dr. Chris7ne Mallinson, UMBC • Dr. Mark McCormack, Durham University • Kurt Bayer, Phd candidate, Indiana University
Steven Dashiell Language, Literature, and Culture • University of Maryland, Bal7more County • [email protected]