НАУКОВИЙ ВІСНИК - Scientific Messenger of LNU of ...
319
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012 . 1998 Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj “ ” 14, 2 (52) 4 Series “Economical sciences” – 2012
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of НАУКОВИЙ ВІСНИК - Scientific Messenger of LNU of ...
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
1
. 1998
Scientific Messenger
of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj
“ ”
14, 2 (52) 4
Series “Economical sciences”
– 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
2
. – , , ., . , , ;
– . , .- ., ., . , , , . . ; . – , . . ., . . .
. – ., , ;
– ., . . ; – ., . . ;
. – ., ., . ; – .- ., . . ;
– ., , ; - ., . . , . .
; – ., , . ;
– ., . , ; – ., . . ;
– . . ., ., . . ; – ., . . ;
. – ., ., - ; – ., , . ; – ., ., ;
– . ., . . ; – . . ., . . ;
– ., ., , ;
– . . ., . . ; – ., ., . , . . , ; – ., . ;
– .- ., ., . . ; . – .- .. ., ., . . ;
. – ., ., . . ; - ., ., . ;
. – . . ., . . ; - ., , . . ;
– ., , . . . ; – ., ., . . , . .
; – ., ., . . ;
. – .- ., ., . . ;
. – . ., . - ( ); . – .- ., ., . . , ; . – . . ., ., . . ;
. - . ., ., . . . – . ., ., . . ,
; . – ., . “ ”, . . ;
– ., . , . . ; . – ., . . ;
– . . ., . . ; . – ., . . ; . – ., ., . . ;
– - ., ., . . ; – ., ., . . ;
. - . .- ., ., . . ; . – .- ., , . . ;
– ., ., . . ; – . .- ., . , ., - ;
- . ., . .
, ( ) .
, .
( 2 26.04.2012 ). 14133-3104
11.06.2008
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
3
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION AND
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ALTERATION
631.115.1 ., ., 1, ., ., 2,
., 1 ©
1) 2)
. .
.
, . ,
. . ,
. , .
, . , ,
. ,
, , .
, ,
, .
,
© ., ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
4
.
, , ,
.
. . , ,
, ,
.
, , , , , , , , ,
, .
, , . ,
( )
. , , ( )
, , ,
, 70% 90%
( ) [8, .58].
, ,
, ,
, ( ) . ,
, .
.
. .
, , : . 2010 .
–
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
5
(3,0%) , ( -, ).
, 2010 . : 103
(52,3%), 86 , (43,7%),
. , 956
, 319,4 . 241,8 . .
. 2000-2010 .
. , ( 2005 .),
, , 2003 .
. , ,
. (
2005 .) 2003 . 92,2%,
90,6% 93,6% , 2010 . – 73,7%, 77,9% 69,5%.
, , , .
2010 . 77,1% , : –72,5%, –87,6%, -95,2% 56,8 %, 50,7% , 68,3% 93,0%
2000 . ,
, . ,
2010 . 96,1% 98,9%
2000 ., – 95,3% 95,5%, –99,1% 98,7%. 2010 . ( ) (
) 92,6% 87,8% 2000 ., - 62,7% 97,2%, , , – 100%, –76,4% 88,1%, –83,3%
98,1%, – 97,9% 89,6%, – 96,5% 93,6%. ,
, ( ) ,
. , , 2010 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
6
48,0% 46,0% 2000 ., ( )
6,2% 52,4%, ( ) -53,1% 91,8%, – 18,4% 95,0% 2000 .
, ,
, . ,
2010 . 2000 . 2,0 , – 2,0 , – 21,8%, –
31,2%, – 9,2%, 9,2%, – 2,4 .
2010 . 90,4%
81,7% 2000 ., 94,4% 89,3%, 63,0% 92,4%, - 91,2% 97,9%, – 98,0%
81,4%, – 97,9% 99,9%, 60,3% 93,2 % – 96,9% 76,4% 2000 . ( .1).
1 ,
,
), % *) 2000 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .
81,7 88,8 88,8 90,0 90,5 90,4 90,4
: 89,3 93,9 93,6 94,0 94,0 93,7 93,4
92,4 85,4 82,7 79,8 72,9 66,0 63,0 97,9 95,7 95,6 93,8 92,9 90,9 91,2
: 92,7 84,6 83,7 77,5 73,1 70,8 72,1 99,7 99,1 99,2 99,0 99,4 97,6 97,3
81,4 93,8 94,6 96,1 97,2 97,5 98,0 99,9 100,0 100,0 98,3 97,8 97,9 97,9 93,2 75,8 71,1 67,4 60,4 61,2 60,3
76,4 94,2 95,0 95,4 96,1 96,7 96,9 *) : [9, .47, 48].
, 2000-2010 . ,
, 100 ( .2).
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
7
2 ,
, 100 ( ), . *)
200 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .
126 92 97 83 78 75 67
: 82 63 59 53 49 47 45
63 55 60 53 49 52 48 2,1 1,2 1,2 1,1 1,0 1,1 1,1
5,0 4,0 5,1 3,5 3,5 3,6 3,7 *) : [9, .50].
, 100 2010 . 67
126 2000 ., – 45 82 , – 48 63 , –1,1
2,1 , – 3,7 5,0 2000 . ,
. 2010 . ,
33,0 % 18,5% 2000 ., , ,
59,6% 34,7%, – 61,6% 35,2%, – 68,4% 54,0%, – 99,2 % 97,0%, –97,3% 94,4% 2000 . ( . 3).
3 ,
( ), % *)
2000 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 . 18,5 26,2 27,2 29,4 31,4 32,3 33,0
,
34,7 45,6 48,4 52,0 57,5 57,1 59,6
35,2 47,2 50,2 54,1 55,0 59,3 61,6 54,0 64,0 63,8 65,7 67,7 66,7 68,4
97,0 99,5 99,5 99,7 99,6 99,2 99,2 94,4 96,9 99,8 97,2 97,0 97,3 97,3
*) : [9, .50].
, ,
( . 4).
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
8
, ,
. ,
. ,
[2, .60-61];
4
20
00.
2005
.
2006
.
2007
.
2008
.
2009
.
2010
.
3273 3628 3828 3895 3895 3909 3906
, 2,7 2,8 2,7 2,6 2,6 2,7 2,5
100 ,
.: 95 96 97 97 97 97 97 1778 1885 1922 1838 1840 2167 1894 79 67 67 68 67 67 67
– --
:
, 1913 2753 2605 2297 2655 3111 2930
, 0,8 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,8 1,8 1,1
100 , .
68 76 77 66 69 70 66 645 1038 1302 901 1329 2057 1873 48 61 100 92 64 42 43
*) : [9, .51].
, – , ,
.
, .
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
9
, .
.
, , .
, , ,
. .
. ,
. .
, ( ) ,
,
.
1. . : / , . – :
, 2010. –201 .
2. . : / // :
: “ ” / . . – : , 2001. - .34-62.
3. . / , //
: / . . – :
, 2006. - .143-153. 4. :
/ . –: , 1998. –36 . 5. .
: / . – , 2010. –149 . 6. . : ,
/ . , . . . – : , 2005. –232 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
10
7. . : / ; . . – .: ,
2011. –654 . 8. .
/ . // . –2004. 11. – -58-68.
9. / : - :
, 2011. –154 . 10. . : ,
: / . – , 2003. –280 .
Summary Berezivskyi P.S.1), Berezivskyi Ya. P.2), Berezivska O. Ya.1)
1) Lviv National Agrarian University, Ukraine 2) Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
named after S.Z. Gzhytsk j, Ukraine PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRIVATE PEASANT’S FARM
The article describes transformation dynamics of development of the private peasant’s farm of post-reform period of Lviv region. Estimation of the structural-dynamic tendencies of development are given, grounded the ways of prospects development of the private peasant farms.
Key words: private peasant’s farm, transformation dynamics, post-reform period, prospects of development.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
11
631.1 ., ©
.
- . : ,
, , .
.
, , .
. . , ,
, -,
. .
. : .,
., ., ., ., ., ., .
.
, .
.
, . , -
, , ,
- , , , , . . .
© – ., .
., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
12
, ( . 1).
. 1.
.
, , [6].
, ,
, , . – , ,
, , ( )
. , " " " ".
:
;
;
.
, :
.
–
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
13
. 2.
– , , , ,
, .
, , , ,
( , , ).
:
1. , .
, ,
. . 2.
. .
3. .
-
–
-
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
14
4. .
, .
. . ,
, . .
, .
1. .
: . – .: . , 2011. – 364 . 2. . – .: , , 1998.-376 . 3. .
, .// . – 2007. - 1. – .86-87. 4. .
// . - 2004. - 1. - . 50-54. 5. . // . 2008 . - 12. - . 48-52. 6. . . . // . – 2004 .
Summary Bodak H.I.
ESSENCE ORGANIZATIONAL - ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF FUNCTIONING AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES
Article is devoted to solving theoretical and practical issues in dealing with crisis in agricultural enterprises and their revival by the rationale of organizational-economic mechanism.
Key words: agriculture, organizational and economic mechanism, farms, agricultural production.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
15
338.432:631.95 ., ., ©
-
, 1990
( ) 60,5 . , 2009 27,7 . , 0,7 0,5 . –
59,8 27,2 . . , 97 % . ,
.
: , , , .
.
, .
, , ,
, : – – – – .
, . .
, ,
.
. ,
. )
, . ,
. ( ,
), .
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
16
, . ,
700 . ( ) . , 240 . ,
, 68,7 51,4 . ( ) .
, .
, , ,
. , [1-5] ,
, .
. .
. , , , , ,
, , ,
, 6308,2 . . 1990
5620,6 . . 2009 , – 147,0 98,4 . . 6161,2
5522,2 . . . 1990 ( )
60,5 . , 2009 27,7 . , 0,7 0,5 .
– 59,8 27,2 . . ,
. , 2009 ( ) 42 ,
345,6 , - 196, - 190,3, - 152,3 . ,
, .
97 % ( )
. ,
.1
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
17
, ,
, , ,
, ,
( ). ,
,
, . ,
,
, . ,
. ,
, .
, , , .
. , ,
, .
1. . //
. – 1999. - 3. – .28. 2. : //
. – 2001. - 5. – .2-55. 3. : ,
. ( 6) / . . – .: , 2007. – 764 .
4. . : , . –
.: , 2010. – 56 . 5. . :
// . – .:
, 2007. – .139-148.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
18
Summary Vlasenko I. V.
Vinnitsa National Agrarian University RABBIT - PROVISIONS IN ENSURING FOOD SECURITY
We show that in Ukraine in 1990 in all categories of implementation rabbits for slaughter (live weight) was 60.5 thousand tons and in 2009 this figure decreased to 27.7 thousand tons, including farms respectively from 0.7 to 0.5 tons in households from 59.8 to 27.2 tons proved that today in Ukraine almost 97% of the number of rabbits is concentrated in individual farms. Of course, the rabbit can be seen as an important industry in solving problems of people with meat and meat products. Keywords: rabbits, rabbits livestock, meat and meat products farms.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
19
332:338.24 ., , ., ©
: , , , .
.
.
- , ,
, . , , .
. ;
. , . , . , JI. , . ,
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . [1].
. ,
, , ,
, „ ” .
,
. . , :
, , );
, , ; , ,
, ; , , ,
, , .
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
20
, - ,
. ( ,
) ( , ), .
, , : ,
, ; ; ( , ,
, ) ; , .
: , , .
,
. , , , ,
. , , , , « »,
, .
[2], , .
. , 90- XX . ,
, . , , .
. , 28
1996 ., ; ,
. 700 ,
. , , ,
. -.
,
, . ,
. , .
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
21
.
(
) . , , [2],
1000 , ,
. ,
, , .
. 1999
30 2000 . 2000
. , ( 832) -
, . ,
, ,
. , ,
, . :
, , ,
. ,
, .
, , , .
: ; ;
( , ),
, , . , -
, , . [3]
. ,
, , -
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
22
. - ,
.
, , -
. , .
, : ;
, ,
, , , ,
, ,
. , ,
. : 1) - -
, , ;
2) ; 3) .
, , ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
. , ,
– .
, ,
, , [4, .3-4].
, . . , -
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
23
, , ,
. .
, .
,
, ( ) , , ,
; . ,
: ,
, . , , [5, . 57].
. . , ,
. , .
. , . -
, . - .
, . - ,
[6, . 32-33].
. -
; ; ,
, -, , .
. ,
, - - .
, , , ,
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
24
, , -
, ,
.
, . .
,
, , ,
. ,
: , , ;
;
, , ;
. , .
. .
, , , ,
,
, . :
, , ,
. ,
, . .
, : 1) ; 2)
, ; 3) ,
, . ,
, “ ” .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
25
1. . .
. - : , . . , 2005. - 550 . 2. ., ., .
. - ., 2001. -215 . 3. http://www.ci.com.ua/agrodep/31html. 4.
/ . .T. , . . . - .: , 2002. - 59 . 5. . . :
: .- : 3 . - . 2: . - .: , 2001. -484 .
6. . 1. //
: , . - . 25: / . . - , 2001. - . 30 - 33.
Summary On the basis of investigation on the mechanism for controlling the national
and regional development of AIC, its main point, functions, tasks and regional features are revealed. It is determined that the mechanism for controlling the AIC is elements complicated and unbalanced as to the directing the functioning of separate AIC elements. Since agricultural policy in Ukraine is conducted by different departments coordination between this is very weak. It is proved that the efficiency of control bodies activities depends on the results of the government activities as to AIC functioning on an all country scale, on the resultative activities of separate services and departments which influence the development of AIC and its separate sections and on the efficiency of control structures which are functioning in AIC on the regional, district and local levels.
Keywords: development control, regional features, control mechanism, control functions.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
26
504.064.4 ., , ., ©
.
. ,
, , , .
: , , , , .
.
, ,
. - ,
. . ,
, .
, , , .
. ,
., ., ., ., ., ., . .
. . 2010
431,6 , 419 , 12,4 .
, (99,6%), IV , 1,1 , 0,3%, - .
5,0 506,5 .
. , , 285,6 (68,1%
) 9061,2 (68,3% ), , , – 38,4 (9,2%)
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
27
2360 (17%), – 26,8 (6,4%) 809 (6,1%).
27,3 , 6,5%, 388,8 , 2,9%), , (2,9 , 0,7% 86 , 0,6%),
(10,4 , 2,5%, 5,1 , 0,04%) [1].
( 5 30%) 40% ( .1).
.1
2372 23502585
2303
1231
1569
950 1059 1031 1071
863 848992 919
307334
642826
32,239,662,171,4 16,515,80
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2010 19%.
, . , ,
. .
. , ,
.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
28
, .
. ,
20 , . 6,5 ,
4 - , 16 - . , , , 20 , .
400 400 100 , 300
200 69,8 . [1].
, , .
, .
. .
, .
, , , .
: 1) ,
, ; 2)
; 3) , ,
; 4)
[2].
. , , ,
. , « » ( )
. ,
. . 5
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
29
, ,
.
.
1. ., ., . : . . — .: , 2007.
— 322 . 2. . //
. — 1999. — 11-12. — .118-120. Summary
Grabowski R. CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS OF USING WASTE AS
SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS IN UKRAINE Waste treatment for Ukraine is the urgent task of national importance,
because so is saving resources, greening the environment and improve management. The processing of waste in the state will create Legal and economic
mechanisms to stimulate enterprises to organize a system for sorting, storing, transporting and processing waste.
Key words: secondary raw materials, waste management, recycling, recycling, recycling exchange.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
30
681.5.017:62-785:338.439.64 . ., ., ©
. ., .
—
: — ,
.
. . , (
) ,
, ,
, ,
, . , , ,
, , ,
. , ,
, .
: , , , , , .
.
.
, , .
,
,
, . .
, © . ., . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
31
, . ,
, .
. , , ,
. “ ”, “ ” ,
, , ,
, , , , .
, , ”, “ ” ( ),
: 1) ; 2) ,
, ( ); 3) ( ) ,
; 4) ; 5) ; 6)
; 7) ( )
; 8) .
, ,
, : 1)
. ; 2) ,
“ ” ;
3) . ;
4) , , ,
; 5) ; 6)
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
32
”, “ ” ,
, . ,
, ,
, . ,
( ) .
. ,
. ,
, ,
, , .
1. . . :
) // . - 2010, . . .; - 168 . 2. . ., . ., . .
// , - 1997 - 3 — . 62-66.
3. . . — ISO // ., . ., -
, . 7, 3,4, - 2006 — . 314-316. Summary
Grymak A.V., Velychko O. V. HACCP – THE EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF CONTROL FOR THE SAFETY OF
FOOD-STUFFS HACCP is the organization system of self-control for the safety of production
which is producing by enterprises of product subcomplex based on different forms of property. In Ukraine HACCP system is spreading widely year by year. Ukraine's membership in WTO and preparation for joining the EU stimulate this process. The safety of nutrition, especially children's one, is a priority direction of state policy. The duty of enterprises that produce food-stuffs is to elaborate and inculcate technologic regulations concerning output producing on the basis of criterions which provide all indexes of production's quality and harmless.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
33
330.338 ., ., , ., , ©
,
, .
.
: , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
, .
.
. ,
.
, .
, .
.
, . ,
, , , , .
, , , , , ,
.
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
34
, , .
.
: . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .
. .
. 1,2%, 2,62
. 18,6%, 12,4%.
, , 10- 14- . 2011
11,08 . , 1990 - 22,5 .
15 .
1998
. , - .
2010 -
. 2011 ( 970 ).
,
, . ,
( , , , ), ( ,
, ). – ,
, , ,
. :
; ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
35
; ; ; -
; .
. ,
, .
, ,
, .
,
, – . ,
. ,
, , ,
. – , .
.
. , . . ,
: ,
; ,
.
. ,
, ,
. , , , ,
.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
36
, ,
, , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
. ,
. , .
, , – ,
, . ,
, : ,
, ;
;
;
;
; ,
, , ; ,
. .
,
.
: ;
; ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
37
, ;
;
; .
,
, .
1. . :
// .– 2005.– 5. – . 139–143. 2. .
// .– 2005.– 4. – . 76–81. 3. .
: . – ., 2004. – 84 . 4. . //
.–2008.– 9. – . 133–138. 5. .
// .– 2008.– 5. – . 136–141. 6. .
// .– 2009.– 7. – . 62–69. 7. .
: . – .: , 2001. – 328 . 8. .
: . – : , 2005. – 346 .
9. . ? // .– 2007.– 1. – . 36–38.
10. . , // & .– 2008.– 10. – . 41–48.
Summary Dadak O.O.
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named afterf S.Z. Gzhytskij
The article exposed the problem and the state dairy industry in Ukraine, and offered reasonable solutions to these important problems of the industry, as its transformation into krupnotovarnogo production and maintenance of high quality raw milk. The analysis of the dairy industry and opportunities for further development at the present stage of market economy as part of agriculture.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
38
636.5: 631.1 ., ©
.
: ,
. , , .
. .
. ,
, .
.
. ,
,
[7].
, ,
, - .
, , – .
,
. ,
, , – . ,
.
.
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
39
[5].
– , ,
. ,
, – , .
, ,
. . -
,
, : . , . , . , . , . . , . ,
. , . , . , . , ,
, . .
,
. .
, .
, .
,
, , .
, , .
, . ,
.
. .
HACCP (Hazard Analysis
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
40
and Critical Control Point), ISO 9001:2000 , , ,
.
, [6].
.
.
, [2].
, " " ,
,
. ,
, , [1].
, , ,
-.
, , : ( ) ; ; ( ) ;
( ) : ; ; ; .
, .
: ; ; ; ; ; , .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
41
: . ,
. ,
.
, :
, , .
,
, . ,
. . ,
. ,
(
, ), , : , ,
, .
« » , .
. , , , , ,
. ,
. – .
. ,
, .
,
. .
,
, , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
42
, .
, , ,
, ,
.
1. . - .: , 2006. - 514 .
2. ., . / . . . :
. . 65. - : , 2007 - . 3-14. 3. , ,
/ . , . , . ..; . . , . . - .: " ", 2006. - 693 .
4. . - .: , 2003. - 335 .
5. ., . . - . 2004. - 1. - . 89-93.
6. http://www.ptizevod.narod.ru 7. http://www.biznes-pro.ua
Summary
With the entry of Ukraine into the World Trade Organization have a qualitatively new socio-economic conditions of agricultural production: economic change, information and legal environment functioning agricultural enterprises. Now they have another purpose and tasks of different nature, which increasingly takes the form of business. There are diverse in type and organizational-legal forms of enterprise. Changed the nature of their connections and relationships between themselves and other market players. For domestic enterprises increased opportunities to enter international markets. However, our country's membership in WTO makes the Ukrainian market open to foreign producers, resulting in the intensity of competition in the domestic market has increased.
Well-being and business success of enterprises depend on the efficiency of their business.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
43
004:338.48 ., , ., .- . . ©
, .
: , , , , .
:
, , , ,
. , ,
, .
,
. , ,
.
. .
, . ,
, . , . ,
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , .
. „ ” , , ,
, . ,
.
, .
. , ,
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
44
, , - .
.
,
, ( ,
). , , ,
, .
, . ,
, , ,
, , .
(Global Distribution System),
, , , , .
AMADEUS, Sabre, Galileo, Wordspam [1, C.132].
, .
, , ,
, .
», « », « » .
,
.
, , ,
, . ,
: ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
45
, .
: , , , ;
, , ,
; , ; ;
, . . 2/3
,
. . ,
.
, ,
, , , ,
, , , , ).
«monitoring.com.ua», – , , ,
. (60%), 20 44 (55%), (65%)
80-100 (38%). « »,
.
(http://www.allrural.com). , , 7%
.
– ,
.
( ), ( ,
, ), ( ).
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
46
. ,
, .
" " - http://www.greentour.com.ua,
, , ;
; , .
. , ,
,
( , , ) .
-
. ,
.
1. . /
. // . – 2010. - 2(6). – . 129-138.
2. . . // . . . . : .- 2006. – 13.-
.528-531. 3. .
/ . , . , . // . – 2001. – 1. – .99-104.
4. . . / . . // . – 2010. – 8. – . 100-105.
Summary Abstract: In the article the principles of information provision of agro formed
requirements for information systems in agro-tourism. Key words: nformation System, rural tourism, information base, development,
resources. – ., . . . .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
47
364.22 ., . ., ., . . ©
« »
, ,
.
. : , , ,
, , .
.
, , ,
[1]. , « , , » [2].
. .
, , .
, ., ., ., ., ., ., . .
, , , ,
,
, , . .
1) , ; 2) ,
; 3)
. .
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
48
, , ,
, , [1].
.1.
[1].
,
, . , , [3].
1. ( , , , , , ,
); 2. ( , , ,
);
;
; ;
;
;
; ;
;
;
;
;
;
;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
49
3. ( , );
4. ( , ,
). . , ,
, , . ,
– , , « », . ,
, – ,
; 5. ( ,
, );
6. ( ); 7. ( , ,
[4]. 8. ( , , ).
, . , ,
, , , ,
, .
, . :
.
, .
. ,
. ,
, , .
, ( ) .
. ,
( )
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
50
. 1984
. , " , ( , ) ,
".
.2.
[1].
1. ;
2.
; 3.
,
1. , ;
2. ;
3. ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
51
. 3.
[1]
,
. , , ,
[1]. .
.
.
, .
1. : .
, , ..]; .. . – : , « » 2010. – 432 .
2. . , : [ ]/ // . – 2009. – 14
( 38).
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4.
1. ;
2.
; 3.
..
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
52
3. . . ,
, , . – .,2004.
4. . / , . . – .: , 2007.
Summ ry The article analyses the basic elements of the system of financial support to
overcome poverty are factors of poverty, which affects the choice of financial instruments. Investigated features of application of financial support measures for overcoming the absolute and relative poverty.
Key words: financial security, poverty, income, financial resources, factors, minimizing.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
53
637.13 ., ©
,
. : , ,
, .
. ,
.
, , .
.
, , ,
. , .
2011 1 , .
, , ( )
. 2011 4268-VI “
“, [1, . 24].
. ,
, . .,
., ., ., .,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
54
., ., : ., ., .
,
. . 2011
. , 2010 2736,5 ., 1 2012 , , – 2631 . –
2011 – 11093,5 . , 98,6% 2010 .
80% 20% ( .1).
2010 1995 61%, – 66% ( 1).
.1. ) [1, .22]
, , , ,
, .
. ,
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1990 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
55
, , 200, 2012 289. ,
[1, .20]. 1
[2],
1995 2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010 /
1995 .%
283,61 193,47 141,48 132,36 120,33 116,14 111,93 39 7531 4958 3347 3096 2856 2737 2631 34
,
– ,
( )
" – – ".
: - ,
; -
; -
( );
- ; -
; - , ,
. ,
: - 2,2 11,25 .
2010 ( 1990 24,5 . ); -
; -
; - 4 . ,
, 50 ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
56
- (42,1% 2010 73,6% 1990 );
- , , ;
-
( – “ “ 2012 ); - ,
, [3]. .
, , . , ,
. , ,
. ,
, [3].
1. . 2011 - /
“ 1 (08), 2012 . 2. /
. 3. : http://www.infagro.com.ua/ru/Product/Yes/26/
Summary O.Kolos, assistant
Lviv national university of veterinary sciences and biotechnologie named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj
BACKGROUND AND FACTORS OF ECONOMIC SECURITY MILK BUSINESS
In the article the main preconditions and factors of economic security milk business,which determine the development of dairy production agriculture.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
57
334.021:82:334.7:338.432 ., ., . ©
.
, ,
.
. : , , ,
, .
. ,
, ,
.
.
, . ,
, , ,
, .
, ,
. .
, .
, .
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , .
. ,
.
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
58
, .
.
. .
.
. – ,
. integration .
, [3], –
( , , .).
( )
[3]. cooperation ,
.
,
, . , , .
, , , .
.
, , ,
, . , ,
, .
, .
,
. , , , ,
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
59
,
( ).
,
, . ,
, .
– .
.
.
, , .
.
, , ( ).
: . ,
. , ,
, ,
. -
. , .
,
, . ,
.
, ,
.
, . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
60
, , ,
. , .
,
. , ,
, , , .
,
. ,
, . ,
, , , ,
. , ,
, , .
, : ,
; ; ;
.
.
: .
, .
, .
, .
.
, . , , ,
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
61
. ,
. ,
, , ,
, . , , , ,
. ,
.
, . ,
.
.
, . ,
, , , , .
, ,
. ,
, , .
:
;
, .
, . ,
.
.
,
. –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
62
, .
, , ,
. , .
, . ,
. :
1) , ;
2) , . ( ), , ,
, .
, ( ), – ,
, . , ,
, , , .
, , ,
, . , ,
. , : -
, ; - .
,
. ,
.
, ,
. , » - , ,
. , , ,
. ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
63
, , ,
. , ,
. .
, ,
, .
, .
, -
.
, ,
.
1. . . / . . // . –
2010. – 3. – . 124-130. 2. . .
/ . . – [2- ., . .]. – . : , 2001. – 380 .
3. : 3- . - .2/ .: . . .) . – .: « », 2000. – .668.
4. . . / . . //
. – 2010. – 1. – . 107-115. 5. . .
/ . . , . . // . – 2010. – 3. – . 3-8.
Summary Korobka S. V.
INTEGRATION BETWEEN SMALL ENTERPRISES IN RURAL AREAS Against the background of world integration processes and consolidation of
businesses that are taking place in Ukraine, described a form of interaction for small business is an opportunity to increase economic size and its subsequent successful operation. The main types of cooperation and integration between small farms.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
64
:330.3:637.54 ., ., , ., ©
,
.
: , , , .
.
. , ,
. , .
. ,
, . .
, . , , , . , . . ,
. , . , , . ,
, .
, ,
, . .
. . , 2022 .
, – , – .
. , , ,
. 50 % . 1980 . 19 %
. 23 % 1990 . 30% 2011 . ,
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
65
2- . 2011 8596 . – 8614 . ( .1).
1 ( ) , .
2008 2009 2010 2011 84 8483 8570 8596
0 0 0 0 8400 8483 8570 8596
8450 8519 8577 8614 0 0 0 0
8450 8519 8577 8614 -50 -36 -7 18
, . 153 139 135 135
2.
2011 , (44,6 ), (39,3 ), (37,5 ) (35,1 ).
. 2
( ) ,
2008 2009 2010 2011 32,5 34,6 34,8 35,1
33,1 33,9 32,2 32,9 38,5 38,9 39,1 39,3
30,5 31,1 31,2 31,4 ( ) 9,6 9,8 10,1 10,3 ( ) 36,8 36,7 37,1 37,5
17,2 17,3 17,4 17,5
) 4,2 4,1 4,1 4,2
( ) 6,1 6,1 6,3 6,4 19,8 21.1 21,3 21.8
17,1 18,6 18,7 19,2 44,2 44,3 44,3 44,6
2 , .
, , . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
66
17,1 . , ,
44 . .
, 2009 , , 2008 , 1 - 22,7 .
1995– 2020 .
32 %. 97 % ,
. 52 % 38 % 1995 .
85 . ,
14 % . (46 %
), : (22 %), (9,1 %) (9 %).
, 1 % .
2% ( . 3). 3
( ) , .
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 8635 8660 8684 8713 8749 8782 8814
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8635 8660 8640 8713 8749 8782 8814
8649 8686 8723 8765 8814 8860 8904 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8649 8686 8723 8765 8814 8860 8904 -13 -26 -39 -52 -65 -78 -91
, . ( )
137 139 141 142 143 144
2018
(45,8 ), (39,4 ), (40,8 ) (37,8 ),
( . 4).
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
67
4 ( )
,
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 35,4 35,7 36,0 36,3 36,7 37,0 37,3
33,2 33,5 33,7 33,9 34,2 34,5 34,8 39,5 39,7 39,9 40,1 40,4 40,6 40,8
31,7 31,8 32,1 32,3 32,5 32,6 32,8 ( ) 10,6 10,8 11,1 11,3 11,5 11,7 11,9 ( ) 37,8 38,1 38,3 38,6 38,8 39,1 39,4
17,6 17,6 17,7 17,8 17,9 18,0 18,1
) 4,2 4,3 4.4 4,5 4,6 4,7 4,8
) 6,5 6,6 6,7 6,8 6,9 7,0 7,1 22,1 22,6 22,6 23,2 23,2 23,5 23,8
19,9 21,2 21,8 22,4 22,4 22,9 23,4 44,8 45,0 45,1 45,3 45,3 45,5 45,8
. ,
, .
, ,
, , ,
.
1. // . – 2010 – . 4(44) . – .14– 19.
2. // . – 2012. – 2(108) . – .76 – 78.
3 . www.farti.iastate.edu/outlook/2009 4. www.fao.org/index_ru.htm 5.http://www.chinafeedindustry.com 6.http://agritrade. cta. int/ 7.http://www. sourcejuice.com 8.http://www. agronews.ru
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
68
330.33:330.834:330.837 ., . ©
( ).
, . .
: , , , , ,
, .
. .
. , , ,
2004-2007 2008-2010 .
, . , (2001-2010)
. .
,
( ). , ,
. .
– , . . , . ,
. , . , . , . , . , . .
.
. , . , . , . . : . ,
. , . , . , . , . .
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
69
, . , .
, .
.
: ; ;
.
.
. , ( . , . , . , . , . .) ,
. , , ,
, , ,
, , , [3,6,10]. , – ,
. ,
, , ,
.
, ,
, , , , , .
, – , , .
.
. , ,
. , , .
, ,
. , , ,
. , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
70
. ,
, , . ,
.
: . , 1970 ,
).
(1975 .) (1976 .), ,
, , . ,
: ,
. , ,
, , . ,
« » .
. (1977) – « » . ,
« » , , – . ,
,
[6].
80- ., .
. . , . (1986), . .
(1988), . (1990), . . (1990) . . (1987)
[3,7,9].
, .
,
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
71
, . , ,
, – , , . , ,
, .
.
– , , . ,
, , , ,
. . ,
, . ,
, , .
, 2000-2010 . ( . 1),
, . 1
2000-2010 .
, %
, %
, . .
,
.
,
. .
, %
) ,
. .
2000 105,9 125,8 1207 -516 571 161,9 3651,5 2001 109,2 106,1 1402 -188 983 106,47 4029 2002 105,2 99,4 3173 -1050 1238 107,12 6994,85 2003 109,6 108,2 2891 247 2185 157,95 -1043,1 2004 112,1 112,3 6909 -4332 2539 141,61 -9133,7 2005 102,7 110,3 2531 8038 10721 142,16 -7645,7 2006 107,3 111,6 -1617 3932 2408 121,32 -3599,3 2007 107,9 116,6 -5918 15776 9421 127,12 -8293,8 2008 102,1 122,3 -12763 9700 -3063 138,58 -9768 2009 85 112,3 -1801 -11925 -13726 100,37 -17037 2010 104,2 109,1 -2884 7914 5030 133,5 -56104,21
: , ,
. , .
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
72
, ,
. ( ) .
161,9
106,47 107,12
157,95
141,61 142,16
121,32
127,12
138,58
100,37
133,5
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
%
. 1. 2000-2010
. 1, ,
. , 2004 (41,6 %) –
(12,1%). . ,
. ,
. 2
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
, %
23,1 13,5 20,4 22,2 24,3 34,2 29,3 28,1 31,2 33,5 22,8
: . 2, 2004 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
73
20%, 30%. , ,
. . 2005 .
(102,7%) (10,3 %). ,
. , , .
, . . ,
. ,
. ,
. – .
– .
– . , .
, ,
. , ,
. ,
– . ,
– . , –
. , , , , ,
, , . , ,
. . .
, , , ,
. , .
.
, . . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
74
: .
. .
, .
, .
. ,
. , .
, ,
, . (
, ) 28% 2010- .
. “ – ,
.
” [8, 119]. :
, , , ,
. , .
, , ,
. , , , ,
. ,
. ,
. .
,
. ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
75
, .
. , : –
– . ,
. 3. 3
,
, . . , . ,
. . 2000 31 154,60 13 956, 553 71 1 207,00 2001 33 170,00 15 775, 092 66 1 402,00 2002 35 530,15 16 976, 834 51 3 173,00 2003 56 120,00 23 020, 771 01 2 891,00 2004 79 471,50 28 996, 030 72 6 909,00 2005 112 975,90 36 141, 094 96 2 531,00 2006 137 063,00 45 034, 491 10 -1 617,00 2007 174 236,00 60 669, 923 00 -5 918,00 2008 241 454,00 85 535, 356 40 -12 763,00 2009 242 357,00 45 435, 559 20 -1 801,00 2010 323 556,20 60 739, 969 30 -2 884,00
: , ,
( 0,86). , , ,
, ). ,
, .
( -0,67) . ,
. , . ,
. -0,87.
. , ,
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
76
, , ( )
. .
4 , ,
, . .
, %
, .
.
, .
,
. 2000 31 154,60 20,50 3 198,00 3 875,00 -516,00 2001 33 170,00 15,70 2 980,00 4 555,30 -188,00 2002 35 530,15 10,81 3 293,00 5 471,80 -1 050,00 2003 56 120,00 9,75 4 065,00 6 794,40 247,00 2004 79 471,50 11,24 6 391,00 9 047,00 -4 332,00 2005 112 975,90 7,25 9 011,00 16 890,00 8 038,00 2006 137 063,00 9,26 12 861,00 21 607,30 3 687,00 2007 174 236,00 6,71 18 618,00 29 542,70 15 776,00 2008 241 454,00 11,86 17 059,00 35 616,40 9 700,00 2009 242 357,00 12,21 15 567,00 40 053,00 -11 925,00 2010 323 556,20 10,39 20 002,00 44 708,00 7 914,00
: , ,
, ,
, , . ,
( – 0,28). ,
. ,
. . ,
.
,
. ( ) ,
. .
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
77
, . , , , ,
.
. ,
. , [2, 86]. ,
.
. , ,
.
.
. , ,
. , , . ,
. ,
. 1998
. 2000- .
2004- , .
.
( ). ( ).
,
” [1].
, , .
. .
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
78
. , .
– , ,
. .
.
. ( )
. .
. ,
.
, .
( ). .
1. . . : : . –
2- ., . . – .: , 2008. – 663 . 2. . .
: . – : , 2001. 3. Alesina, A. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy / A. Alesina, N.
Roubini, G. Cohen. – Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999. – 302 p. 4. Coakley, J. Kulasi, F., Smith, R. The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle and Capital
Mobility: A Review. International Journal of Finance and Economics. 1998, 169-188 No. 3 : http://dipeco.economia.unimib.it/ Persone/ Colombo/ finarm/ feldstein-horioka-review.pdf
5. Cukierman, A. Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government, and the Benefits of Constitution / A. Cukierman, A.A. Meltzer // Economic Inquiry.. – 1986. – Vol. 24. – P. 367-388.
6. Hibbs D. Political Parties and Macroeconomics Policy / D. Hibbs // American Political Science Review. – 1977. – Vol. 71. – P. 1467-1487. Nordhaus, W. The Political Business Cycle / W. Nordhaus // Review of Economic Studies. – 1975. – Vol. 42. – P. 169-190.
7. Persson T. Designing Institutions for Monetary Stability / T. Persson, G. Tabellini // Carnegie- Rocyester Conference Series on Public Policy. – 1994. – Vol. 39. – P. 58-94.
8. International Monetary Fund. Sixth Edition of the IMF's Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. : http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bopman6.htm
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
79
9. Rogoff, K. Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles / K. Rogoff // American Economic Review. – 1990. – Vol. 80. – P. 21-36.
10. Rogoff, K. Elections and Macroeconomic Police Cycles / K. Rogoff, A. Sibert // Review of Economic Studies.. – 1988. – Vol. 55. – P. 1-16.
11. Tsanacas D., Kasibhatla K., Malindretos J., A Survey of the Monetary Approach to International Finance // Balance of Payment Adjustment: Macro Facets of International Facets Revisited / A. Arize, H. Bonitsis, I. Kallianotis, K. Kasibhatla, and J. Malindretos. – London: Greenwood Press, 2000. – P. 24-30
Summary Yuriy Myronovych, Nazar Lypko
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Svobody Av., 18. 79008, Lviv, Ukraine
IMPACT OF POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLE ON UKRAINE’S EXTERNAL BALANCE
Relation between a political business cycle and external balance is considered in the article. The authors provide expanded explanation of the main aspects of the theory of a political business cycle and external balance. Analysis of the impact of political business cycle on external balance is made on Ukraine’s example.
Key words: political business cycle, external balance, capital mobility, opportunistic theory, current account, capital account.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
80
336.717.061 ., , ©
( )
, . ,
, .
, .
: , , , .
.
( ) .
. , ,
. .
, .
, .
,
.
, - ,
.
– – [1-3].
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
81
. ,
. .
,
. ,
, , [1].
. ,
. , ,
,
, , , , .
- , , ,
. . 1 , (
).
. 1.
: – ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – .
, ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
82
, , .
.
. 2.
. 2.
.
: – ; –
; –
; – ; –
; – .
, -
, , , . . -
, .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
83
, , ,
.
. : – ,
;
– ; – ; – ; – , ; – ; – ; – , ; –
. . ,
,
.
. , – ,
. .
.
, : , ,
. , ,
.
. . ,
, , , . ,
( – 0,15-0,25%), ,
. .
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
84
, .
, .
, , . – .
. , , -
. , , , , , .
. , , -
. ( ,
, ) ,
[2]. .
– ,
, , [3].
, ,
[4]. – .
. 3.
. 3.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
85
, , , , , ,
, , , , .
, . – ,
. . .
. ,
, ,
, , ,
. ,
, , ,
, .
. , , ,
. , , ,
, ,
.
1. : . . / . – 2- , . . // .: . ,
2004. – 172 . 2. ., .
/ http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/PORTAL/
soc_gum/KNP/147/knp147_73-76.pdf 3. : . . .
. . . / . ., . ., . . . . . . // .: , 2009. – 472 . 4. http://met-online.kiev.ua/menu/dovidka/inko/
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
86
Summary Pelenskyy R.A., magister, bread-winner
Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnologies named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj
A SPECIFIC OF LOGISTIC IS DURING REALIZATION OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY BY ENTERPRISES OF UKRAINE (FEA) The logistic during realization of FEA is characterized by original features
which arise out of necessity of crossing of state boundaries processing of corresponding custom documents. In addition it is necessary to take into account features legislations of the states, which international transportations are carried out through. The requirements formulated to that end are to the construction of the effective logistic systems of enterprises, which carry out foreign economic activity.
Key words: logistic, foreign economic activity, international transportations, custom border.
– ., . . . .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
87
338.46:636.09 ., ., ,
., ., ©
. ,
. : , ,
, .
.
.
. , .
, 90 % , .
.
.
, . .
.
. ,
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . ,
. .
. . , “ , , ,
” [2, .45]. . ,
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
88
[4, . 46–47]. ,
[3, . 143]. . ,
,
, [1].
. .
.
. , ,
, , ,
, .
. .
90%.
. ,
. , .
.
( . 1). 1
( )
2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 . 2011 . 2011 .
% 2007 .
–
. - -
371065
898
370167
323407
854
322553
322373
762
321611
321895
653
321242
319883
459
319424
86,2
50,8
86,3
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
89
. 1 – , .
. . . :
- -
564,40
93,43
470,97
573,67
96,90
440,73
538,78
114,85
423,93
537,16
119,04
418,12
501,53
117,15
384,38
88,9
125,4
81,6
, . .:
- -
104,04
1,27
113,47
1,37
150,73
1,32
182,30
1,30
255,23
1,20
2,5
94,5 : .
. .
.
.
2007 2011 2,5 , , – 25,4 % ( . 1).
.
2011 , , 18,3 % , ,
.
( . 2). 2
2011
,
-
,
49 86 52,4
50-99 22 13,4 100-199 26 15,9
,
200-499 16 9,8 500 14 8,5
: 164 100 : .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
90
.
, , ( . 3).
3 ,
2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .
2010 .
2006 . –
, . 7130,6 8312,3 14918,2 17644,2 18984,0 2,7
.: -
- ;
6698,4 7786,3 14176,6 16867,1 17688,3 2,6
- , -
432,2 559,6 741,6 777,1 1295,7 3,0
: .
.
, .
2010 42 .
. 2010
6,8%.
. 6,7 17,7 . . 2010 . 93,2 % ( . 3).
, . , ,
. - ( ) 2010 0,87,
. ,
0,18. ,
.
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
91
, .
.
.
. ,
. 5- . :
(4,08 ), (3,67 )
(3,35 ). :
) ; )
, , ,
; )
, ; ) ,
. ,
, , 5- , (4,53 ),
(4,45 ) (4,24 ).
, . ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
92
, 1991
. ,
, ,
.
. .
1. . / . // : : 5 :
[ ] – : http://conftiapv.at.ua/publ/konf_14_15_grudnja_2011_r/sekcija_5_ekonomichni_nauki/teoretichni_osnovi_veterinarnogo_obslugovuvannja/29-1-0-1247.
2. . . / . . // . –
2000. – 7. – . 45–50. 3. . .
/ . . // . : . – 2010. – 4. – C. 143–145.
4. . / . , . // . - 1998. - 8. - . 46-47.
5. . . / . . , . . – .: – 2001. – . 124–144.
Summary Poperechnyi S. I., Babych L. V.
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhytskyi, Lviv, Ukraine
FORMATION OF AREA VETERINARY SERVICE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MARKET RELATIONS
The problems of market relations in the field of veterinary service are considered. The reasons of hinder the development of entrepreneurship are analyzed.
Key words: veterinary services, veterinary services market, monopoly, private veterinary practice.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
93
339.138:619 ., .,
., .,
. .
.
. : , ,
.
. ,
. .
.
. .
.
. , . , . ,
. , . , . , . , . , . ,
. , . , . , . , . , . , . .
. , – “ ,
.. ,
” [6, . 638].
, . “ ”. “ ,
, ” [2, . 8; 3, . 7].
. . , [13, . 46].
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
94
“ ”, ”,
, “ , , ”, ,
, , , [3, . 3; 14, . 262]. ,
, [7, . 43; 12, . 13].
, [12, . 13]. ,
. , , [8, . 8; 2, . 8].
. . . ,
“ , ”, (product, goods and services),
goods ( ) services ( ) , [11; 5, . 5].
, . : “ – ,
, ( ), ” [192, . 25].
, “ ” [40, . 8].
– , , [44, . 43].
, – [10, . 25].
, ;
, ; ,
. . .
,
[1, . 34]. “ ”
, “ “ “ , ,
, ,
, ” [9].
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
95
, .
. “ ”
, ,
,
. .
, ,
, – .
, ,
. ,
.
, , .
, ,
.
( . 1).
. 1.
–
– –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
96
,
. ,
: , , , , , , , ,
, . , , ,
, , .
.
. ,
.
. , ,
. , .
. “ ” ,
, .
, , ,
– . ,
, .
.
. . .
, . ,
, . .
. ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
97
. ,
. .
. – ,
.
, , , .
, , .
: , , ,
. , , . ,
.
. – . ,
, -,
. ,
, ,
. ,
.
. –
, .
.
, , . ,
. ,
, . ,
– , . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
98
, , .
( , , )
. .
. .
1.
. 2.
, .
3. .
1. . .
/ . . , . . // . : “ ”. – 2011. –
.2. – .1. – . 32–38. 2. . . : /
. . , . . . – .: , 2001. – 128 . 3. . : , ,
/ . // . – 1997. – 6. – . 2–5.
4. . . / . . // . – 1998. – 8. – .
42–52. 5. . .
] / . . // . – 2003. – 5. – . 3–21. – :
http://www.dis.ru//library/market/archive/2003/5/328.html. 6. . . – .: , 1992. – 732 . 7. . . ,
/ . . // . – 2001. – 9–10. – . 43–47.
8. . . / . . . – . : , 1996. – 128 .
9. : 25.06.1992 2498-12 ( ) [ ] // . – 1992. –
36. – : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2498-12. 10. / . , . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
99
. , . ; . . . – 2- . – . : , 2002. – 752 .
11. . : / . // . – 1997. – 6. – . 115–120.
12. . / . // ( ). – 1999. – 1. – . 13–15.
13. Gronroos C. Service management and marketing / C. Gronroos. – West Sussex, 2000. – P. 1, 46, 48.
14. Rosenberg J. M. Dictionary of marketing and advertising (Business dictionary series) / J. M. Rosenberg. – New York ; Chichester ; Brisbane, 1995. – P. 140, 262, 310.
Summary Poperechnyi S. I., Babych L. V.
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhytskyi, Lviv, Ukraine
MARKETING ACTIVITY IN VETERINARY SERVICE The theoretical problems of forming veterinary service are considered. The
forming of system of marketing elements considering features of veterinary service and its embranchment by potential customer is proposed.
Key words: marketing services, veterinary services, features of veterinary services.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
100
65:011 ., ., ., ©
.
, -
.
. -
. .
. , , , ,
.
. , , ,
, . 2010
. ,
( ). 2011
. " ". ,
, - ( -
).
, .
- , ,
. , .
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
101
" ".
. ( . Henry
Morgenthau) - , , , 1934 1945 .
, , : " , , ,
".
. " ".
" [1-3].
.
.
, , ,
, . ,
. , ,
, – " – ".
, [4, . 77-78].
.
, .
, , , - Openness Growth Monitoring Model
[5].
, ,
, [6].
2005 . ( ) " ".
:
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
102
, , . " " -
: -
( ); - ; - .
" " ("Globalization Index"),
A.T. Kearney Foreign Policy.
, : 1) – ,
( . . ), ; 2) ,
, ; 3) , –
; 4) , [7].
–
("Index bioethical capacity for globalization"). : -
("The index of economic capacity for globalization"); -
("Index of ecological and economic capacity
for globalization").
. , -
.
, " [3, . 316-319].
. ,
: 1) ; 2)
; 3)
( ) ; 4)
( )
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
103
. .
: 1)
; 2) -
; 3)
" "
; 4) .
. .
: , , ; ,
- . ,
.
, " " -
. , , : 1)
, , - , - ,
) ,
, ; 2) ,
1991–2000 . , , , ,
; 3) ; 4)
.
-
( . 1). , 2 -. –
): ( , , ) ( )
( ). –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
104
): ( ) , ( ,
, ) .
: ( ) ( , ,
, , , , )
.
.1. ( )
:
: ;
; ;
.
.
. 1.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
105
1.
:
-
1.
: 1) ;
2) ; 3) ;
4) .
)
. 2.
, : 1) ;
2) -;
3) ; 4) ;
5) ; 6)
.
( ).
3.
, ,
: 1)
( ); 2)
( ); 3)
( ); 4)
); 5)
( ); 6)
).
,
, .
.
4.
:
1) ;
2) ;
3) ;
4) .
. ,
.
,
. 2.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
106
2
:
.
1.
,
; ;
; .
2.
, ;
- (
). 3.
, .
4.
(
– )
, ,
, ,
, .
5.
,
, .
, , , ,
. ,
.
6.
,
. " ".
. 7.
, ,
, .
, ,
. 8.
,
.
,
– ,
" " " ". ,
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
107
. 9. ,
, .
1 .
, , ,
. 10.
( , , ,
)
-
. ,
; .
,
) . 3. , ,
, . 3.
:
1.
,
–
. 2.
- , .
, , ,
, . 3.
. 4.
,
, ,
, ,
,
. ,
. 5.
, ,
, 50%,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
108
- 58%. 21,7 , 37,3%.
6.
( ). ,
,
, , ,
, .
1. , ,
, 25% , –
14–15% , , .
2. ,
– , ,
. ,
, .
3. -
- ,
,
. 4.
55% , .
, , , , ,
, , , , .
– ,
, .
5. "
.
.
6.
2007 .
68,5%, – 14%;
.
( ) . 4.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
109
4.
( )
:
1.
" "
.
, , , " -
") .
, ,
.
2.
, ,
.
3. :
,
– .
, , .
4. -
, . :
. , .
(
, ). .
5.
, : , , ,
, .
6.
. )
( ), -
– .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
110
7.
,
,
,
. ,
,
.
.
(
) . 5. 5.
( )
:
1
, , : -
, ; ,
,
; ,
. 2
:
; -.
, –
. 3
,
, - .
, , , , ,
, , ,
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
111
. 4.
-
,
– –
, .
5.
–
, ,
. 6.
,
,
, .
7.
,
. , ,
, .
( ;
; ).
8.
;
);
.
" "
. . 2.
: 1) ; 2) ; 3) ; 4) ; 5)
; 6) . " "
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
112
. 2.
" " 2008-2009
:
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
113
.
( . 3).
. 3.
:
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
114
– . 4.
. 4.
:
:
;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
115
; (
) ; (
) .
.
: ;
;
" " ;
.
: , , ; ,
; ,
; ,
; , , . ,
; , , ; ,
, .
: 1)
; 2)
; 3) .
1. Morgenthau .J. Politics among Nations. / .J. Morgenthau. - New York,
1967. - P. 3. 2. . . : /
, . . - .: , 3- ., . ., 2007. - 461 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
116
3. . : / . [ . ]. – :
" ", ., ., 2011. – 440 .
4. . : , , / . . - .: . – 2005. – 4.
– . 76–79. 5. M.A.R., Yap S.F. The openness growth monitoring model (OGM-Model) //
Journal of Policy Modeling. – 2006. – Vol. 28. – Pp. 235-246. 6. . .
/ . , . : . . . : .: . – 2004. – 69. – . 35–43.
7. OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators [ ]: OECD, 2005. – : http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/
display.asp]. Summary
Pun’ko B.M. REAL CRITERIA GROWTH RATE OF OPENNESS AND
PRAGMATIC NATIONAL OF THE ECONOMY IN GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.
It is set forth indexes-table data that represent of reason-consequences intercommunications at global level of economy are set forth. The methodological features of design of monitoring of increase of openness and pragmaticness of national economy are generalized. The algorithms of logic-schematic design of intercommunications and determination of criteria of development of national economy are presented in a global environment. The conceptual whole adjusting of external economy and bank climate is distinguished.
Key words. Reason-consequencesi intercommunications, openness and pragmaticness of national economy, criteria, conceptual aims, adjustings.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
117
338.439.5: 636.5 ., . . . ©
. .
: , , , .
. [3, . 93]. ,
, ,
, .
, , ,
, ,
.
. . , . . , . . , . . , . . .
, ,
. .
, , . .
. .
, :
; , ,
, ;
, ,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
118
, ( . 1).
. 1. .
-
,
,
,
)
-
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
119
: . ,
– ,
, .
.
, , , . .
, , , , .
–
, , , , ,
, , .
. ,
:
. , ,
– , . ,
, , .
. ,
.
,
.
.
, , 1000 . ,
, , . 1.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
120
,
, , .
1
,
1
000
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
0,95 0,63 0,91 0,91 0,95 0,67 0,91
: 2000-2010 .
, , ,
. . 2.
2
,
1
(
)
,
’ (
)
, .
’ (
)
, .
(
)
, .
’ (
)
, .
0,967 0,949 0,953 0,909 0,829 0,034 0,97
: 2000-2010 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
121
, ,
, . ,
, , , ,
. .
, ,
, .
1. . . : [ ] / . . –
: http://www.books.efaculty.kiev.ua. 2. . .
[ ]. – : http:// www.credit-rating.com.ua.
3. . . / . . . – : , 2000. – 450 .
Summary Sendetska S. V.
MAIN DIRECTIONS AND GOALS OF THE STATE REGULATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS MARKET
The system of aims of different state regulation levels for poultry products market was formed in this article.
Key words: poultry products market, state market regulation, eggs, poultry meat.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
122
339.138:637.11 ., ©
. . .
.
. : , ,
. .
. : ,
; ;
;
, ;
, .
, ;
, .
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , , . , . , . , . , . .
. , . , . , . .
,
, .
© . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
123
.
. :
- ;
- ;
- ;
:
. ,
.
.
, ,
. . - ,
, , ,
. ,
. (
) .
. ,
, . , ,
. . ,
. , .
4 .
, , . ,
, . , - .
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
124
, ,
, ,
. –
, , , .
. ,
. , , -
, , , . ,
– , , , , , ,
, , , ,
,
. ,
, , , ,
. , : ,
; ; ; ;
. ,
.
: - ; - ; - ; - .
. 1.
: , 40 %
, .
2. – . : ; ;
; ; .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
125
3.
, , , ,
:
, ;
, ,
;
;
, .
4. ,
, , .
1. . : , ,
: . - .: , 2001. - 320 . 2. - 2005 - 21;
2. . . / . . // . – 2008 - 5. – . 61
– 64. 3. . .
/ . // : : ». – 2007. - 6. – . 250-260.
4. . . // . . . – :
», 2005. – 240 .
Summary Seniv R.V.
Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnogies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj
SOME ASPECTS OF IMPROVING MARKETING PRODUCERS OF MILK IN LVIV
Some aspects of improving marketing enterprises for the production of milk. A formation of a regional vertical marketing system is based on molocharska Association.
Key words: milk, marketing activities, dairy production. – ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
126
: 65.015.6:637’6 ., .
.
: , , , .
.
, ,
. ,
, . ,
. ,
. ,
, .
, ,
.
- .
,
. .
. ., B. ., . .
. ., . ., . ., . ., . . , . ,
, , , – .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
127
.
. .
.
, . , 2009 , 01.01.2012
11,1% 24158 , – 13,8% 28990
( . 1, . 2). 1
,
2009 2010 2011 2011 . % 2009 .
27177 24167 24158 88,9 18238 15080 14627 80,2
3995 3728 3919 98,2 386 215 188 48,7
3283 2675 2424 73,8 1219 953 1293 106,1
650 551 276 42,5 1952 1761 1843 94,4 6426 4896 4374 68,1 327 301 310 94,8
4282 4515 4784 111,7 834 742 581 69,7
1345 1817 2264 168/,3 403 403 354 87,8
383 300 298 77,8 90 75 121 134.4
1227 1178 1166 95,0 4638 4465 4727 101,9
2008 1895 1903 94.8 2045 2046 2193 107.2
199 202 199 100,0 386 322 432 111,9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
128
.
.
, .
,
,
, , ( . 2). 2
, ,
2009 2010 2011 2011 . % 2009 .
33631 289922 28990 86,2 22742 18199 16670 73,3
4167 3639 3878 93,1 963 546 265 27,5
5264 3812 3215 61,1 1620 1430 1601 98,8
621 654 332 43,4 2130 2087 1950 91,5 7704 5763 5218 67,7 273 268 211 77,3
6105 5584 7170 117,4 1273 1101 1123 88,2
2642 2371 3883 146,9 353 327 263 74,6
332 277 247 74,5 343 70 302 88,1
1162 1438 1352 116,4 4850 5068 5125 105,7
1796 1866 1731 96,4 2673 2757 2867 107,2
207 271 257 124,2 174 174 270 155,2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
129
, :
- , ,
; - ,
,
; - ,
; - , , ; - ; -
;
- ,
; -
, , .
, ,
.
. , , .
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, .
. , . 3 , , 2009 2011 ,
, 2009
482 , 2011 - 510 , 42 , 2010 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
130
3
, 2009 2010 2011 2011 . %
2009 . 482 468 510 105,8
539 478 465 86,3 385 360 418 108,6
594 570 411 69,2 848 563 540 63,7 667 494 483 72,4
504 485 404 80,2 391 463 474 121,2 428 400 489 114,2 494 485 503 108,8
496 460 556 112,1 503 496 594 118.1
848 728 794 93,6 364 311 291 110.2
340 388 381 112.1 532 339 814 153,0
391 501 464 118,7 408 481 443 108,5
364 378 375 103,2 575 743 743 129,2
458 525 370 80,8 236 279 285 120,7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, .
. , 2009 25,0 . ,
2011 – 21,9 . , 3,1 . , 12,3%. ( . 4).
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
131
4
, , 2009 2010 2011 2011 . %
2009 . 36895 3976 63217 171,3
25001 25297 21918 87,7 4227 5996 7663 181,3
2127 570 109 5,1 4927 4617 2615 53,1 2012 1680 1424 70,8
' - 490 1056 1572 320,8 1676 2289 2147 128,1 9204 8783 6146 66,8 338 306 242 71,6
8008 9417 27260 340.4 1713 1759 1690 98.7
3702 5504 22922 619.2 71 310 90 126.7
575 446 165 28.7 695 92 1118 160.8
1252 1306 1275 101,8 3877 4352 14025 361.7
1080 1000 1236 114.4 2513 3129 12516 490.1
122 121 70 57,4 162 102 203 125,3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, , , ,
, –
, .
, , ,
. . ,
:
1.
. 2.
-
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
132
, –
.
3.
. 4.
)
, . 5.
,
. 6.
.
1. . .
: [ ] / . ., . ., . . – : , 2011.
– 184 . 2. : [ ] /
. ., . ., . . .] ; . . . . – . : , 2005. – 496 .
3. 2015 // 19 2007
1158. – ., 2007 – 71 . 4. //
20 2008 729 ]. – : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/
show/729-2008-%D0%BF 5. .
1 2010 . . – . – 2011. – 28 .
6. . 2011 .
. – , – 2012. – 26 . – ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
133
330.341.1:636.2 ., ., 1, ., 2©
1 ( . ) 2
.
, .
: , , , , , .
.
, , ,
.
, ,
. 2050 .
9 . , 67 %.
2000-2011 . , 2012 .
. .
.
2010-2014 . “ , , ”,
“… , ” [1].
2012 .
,
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
134
. . . [2]
,
: “ , ” [2, . 15].
. , . .
[3], . , . [4], . , . , . C
. [5], . [6], . [7], . [8],
.
, ..
.
. , .
,
. . . . . , “
” [4 ,c.6]. .
. 2011 . 20,1 . ., 3,2 . . 2010 .
. [8], .
,
( ) .
,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
135
. ,
, .
. [6],
.
, , [9]:
f (ns) = (ns) maxmin (1),
.
. ,
.
1 .
“ ” 50
,
. 2011 . 42,5 . .
, ,
. ,
. . [10],
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
136
.
, . ,
, , 70-75 20
.
3,5-4,5 . ,
.
,
, . ,
, . 70 %
, 25 %-
, 5 % - . .
, ,
: 1) ; 2)
; 3)
; 4)
; 5) .
1. 2010-2014 .
, , ” – .: , 2010. – 87 . -[ ]. – . – www.
president.gov.ua.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
137
2. . / . , . . – .: ,
2012. – 48 . 3. . / . , . // . –
2011. - 2. – . 188 – 199. 4. 2020 / [ . . , . - ]. – .:
”, 2012. – 182 . 5. . / .
// . – 2001. - 11. - . 3-28. 6. Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation / R. Axelrod. – New York:
Basic Books, 1984. – 486 p. 7. Allen P.M. Modelling Evolution and Creativity in Complex Systems / P.
M. Allen // World Futures. – 1992. – Vol. 34. – P. 105-123. 8. . / . –
.: , 2009. – 461 . 9. Wuchy S. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in the Production of
Knowledge / S. Wuchy, F. J. Benjamin, U. Brian // Science. – 2007. – N. 317. – P. 1036-1039.
10. . . , / . .
– .: , 1982. – 436 .
Summary Chemerys V.A., Ph.D1., Solomonko D.O.2
1Institute of Regional Science NAS of Ukraine 2Lviv National University of Biotechnologies and Veterinary Medicine
named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj STRATEGIC PRIORITIES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DAIRY
FARMING ENTERPRISES IN UKRAINE In the article main tendencies of innovative development of agribusiness in Ukraine dairy farming in the concept of sustainable development are considered. Key words: agrarian sector, development, entrepreneurship,dairy farming, strategy, region.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
138
631.11:338.3 ., ©
.
.
. : , ,
, , , .
.
. .
. ,
.
, .
: . , . , . , . , . , . , . ,
. , . , . , . [1-8] . , ,
. ,
.
. .
,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
139
.
. , ,
. . , ,
,
, . , .
: ? ,
, [9, .222-223]. ,
– , - ( . 1).
, :
- ; - , ; - .
1 [9, .222-223].
1
, 1 :
,
2.
,
2 ,
3 ,
,
3. GAP- , LOTS- , SWOT-
4 ,
4 ,
, GE/Mc-Kinsey . 5. (
PIMS)
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
140
, , , ,
. , , 2010 .
, %:
– 73,3; – 18,2 – 8,1.
. , ,
, : ,
.
, , , .
. , 1,
. , ,
: , .
, 1.
, , , ,
. – –
. , ,
, ,
. . ,
XX – XXI . -
, , .
. , .
, , .
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
141
. ,
.
, , .
, ,
,
. ,
.
, 1.
. ,
.
. ,
, . , ,
, ,
, . ,
, , .
, , .
, .
, , .
, .
« » [9, .222].
. , , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
142
( , , )
. .
, ,
: , . , , .
. , 1, ,
. .
« » : , »
[10, .278]. , – , » [11, .487].
.
. 1,
, , , ,
. ,
, .
. , ,
. ,
.
.
1. ., .
/ , // : . –
2010. – 17(2). – .3-8. 2. . :
: / . . . – .: . – 270 .
3. . / . . – .: , 2003. – 324 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
143
4. . / . // : ,
: / . . . – : , 2008. – .140-154.
5. . : , , / . . – : , 2008. – 520 .
6. . . / . – . Port-Roal, 2001. – 684 .
7. . / . , . . – .: , , 1997. – 800 .
8. . / // : . – 2010. –
17(2). – . .9-14. 9. : . . / . . ,
, , , . – .: , 2007. – 744 . 10. : 65 000 / .
. . , . . : « », 2006. – 1008 . 11. : . .1 / .. .
) . – : « », 2000. – 864 .
Summary Shulskyy A.M, postgraduate student
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after SZ Gzhytskij
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OF AGRICULTURAL The article analyzed the functioning of the advantages of existing organizational
and economic structures in the system of agriculture based on the use of certain developments in this area. The measures for more efficient use of advantages of individual farm units.
Key words: competitive advantage, agrarian formation, agrarian production, private farms, farm enterprise.
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
144
330.33: 631.11 ., ., ©
. .
, ,
, . : , ,
, , , .
. , . – ,
, , .
. , , ,
.
, , .
,
.
, . , ,
, ,
, . .
. . ,
, , , 2003 . 93,2% ? ,
, , , .
,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
145
, .
, , .
, , ,
, . ,
. : . , . , . ,
. , , . , . , . . , . , . [1-7] . :
, –
. , ,
. , ,
, .
, . .
.
, .
.
, . ,
, 2003 . [8].
, , ,
. .
, – , .
, .
« ». , , «
» [8] , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
146
, , . , , ,
, . . « »
, « ». , . ,
, ? ,
, . ,
, , , .
. , ,
« » ( «
»), . , .
– . , , ,
. 1
*
1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2008 . 2010 . 2010 . % 1995 . 2005 .
.- . , . . 412,1 642,8 797,6 799,0 796,1 193,2 99,8
.- . , % 32,3 50,4 62,8 63,0 62,9 +30,6 +0,1
219,1 388,1 519,2 519,2 523,5 238,9 100,8
, % 25,6 47,1 65,1 65,1 65,7 +40,1 +0,6
100
.- . , . .** 281,5 729,9 481,5 415,6 391,3 57,4 81,3
: 325,8 341,7 226,4 217,5 207,8 63,8 91,8 355,7 388,2 255,1 198,1 183,5 51,6 71,9
: * 2010 [9];
** 2005 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
147
,
. , , , , ( )
( ) .
1995 - 2010 . 1 ,
100
. , :
XXI , 100
– 2005 . , . ,
, 2000 ., 100
.
. 2. 2
, , 2005 .
1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2008 . 2010 . 2010 . %
1995 . 2005 –
, . . 2702,7 3592,4 3635,6 3366,8 3083,7 114,1 84,8
: 1291,9 1681,8 1709,3 1762,1 1637,7 126,8 95,8 1410,8 1910,6 1926,3 1604,7 1446,0 102,5 75,1
,
,% 68,5 90,8 89,6 78,3 73,7 +5,2 -15,9
: 66,4 88,2 88,8 80,4 77,9 +11,5 -10,9 70,6 93,1 90,3 76,1 69,6 -1,0 -20,7
, 2010 .
1995 . . , , 14,1%,
: – 26,8 % – 2,5%. , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
148
( . 1). 93,2%, – 138,9%. , ,
.
, ,
. :
? , , . ,
( . 1), ( . 2) ( 15,2%), –
( 4,2%) ( 24,9%).
.
. , .
. .
. ,
, . , , 2010 . -3676 ,
-317 . [9, . 213]. , , . -
, .
, , . .
. .
, . , , . , ,
.
. .
.
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
149
, , ,
. , ,
, , ,
. ,
? , , , . . , ,
( , , )
. .
. . ,
, , , ,
. .
: - , ,
, , , ,
. , , ;
- . , ,
, , ;
-
. ,
; -
, , , .
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
150
– , .
1. . :
/ . // : / . .
. – .: , 2010. – . 123 - 132. 2. . :
/ . , . , . , . // : . – 2010. –
17 (2). – . 234 - 238. 3. . :
/ . // . – 2010. – 10. – . 112 - 115.
4. . : / . // . – 2005. – 9-10. – . 15 - 23.
5. . / , //
: . . . – . : , , 2009. – . 43 - 54.
6. .
/ . // : : . – 2007. – 12. – . 489 - 494.
7. . . : , . / . . – :
», - 2003. – 280 . 8. « » 15
2003 ., 742 – V. 9. 2010 . 1 /
. . . – , 2011. – 362 .
Summary Shulskyy M.G
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after SZ Biotechnologies, Lviv, Ukraine.
ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL FARMS LVIV Activity of the personal peasant economies of population of the Lviv area is
investigational, what reasons that brake their development are set as a result of, and also concrete measures are offered in relation to their removal.
Key words: private farms, lands, gross output, forms management, crop production, animal husbandry
– ., .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
151
338.43:636.3+636.39 ., .,
. .
.
. : , , ,
, , , .
.
, .
, .
. , , ,
, , , .
. -,
. , ,
. – . .
, , .
, , », «
» , ,
.
.
, , , . , , , , ,
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
152
. : . , . , . , . , . , . , . , .
, . , . [1-8] . , ,
, . , .
.
. ,
. .
.
. ,
, .
, .
[9;10]. ,
( , ).
, : 1990-2010 .
, : :
, ,
. 1.
- 64,0 . . 1990
. 22,6 . 2010 ., 2010 . 35,3% 1990 . 2000 . ,
. ,
. , , 1990 . 64,0 . , 50,5 . ,
13,5 . , 21,1 %, , 2010 . : 22,6; 5,4;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
153
17,2 76,1. 2000-2010 . .
1*
, .
1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . %
1990 . 2000 .
, : 64,0 42,3 33,5 23,5 22,6 35,3 67,5
50,5 18,7 8,2 5,2 5,4 10,7 65,9 13,5 23,6 25,3 18,3 17,2 127,4 68,0
, %
21,1 55,8 75,5 77,9 76,1 +55,0 +0,6
, ,
: 43,0* 67,2**
8,2 19,2
0,7 2,1
1,0 4,3
2,0 8,5
4,7 -58,7
285,7 +6,4
43,0 85,1
8,2 43,5
0,6 7,3
0,8 15,4
1,5 27,5
3,5 -57,6
250 +20,2
- - 0,1 0,3
0,2 1,1
0,5 2,9 - 500,0
, % - - 42,9 20,0 25,0 - +17,9
,
: 21,0** 32,8***
34,1 80,8
32,8 97,9
22,5 95,7
20,6 91,2
28,1 +58,4
62,8 -6,7
7,5 14,9
10,5 56,5
7,6 92,7
4,4 84,6
3,9 72,2
52,2 +57,3
49,4 -20,5
13,5 100,0
23,6 100,0
25,2 99,6
18,1 98,9
16,7 97,1
123,7 -2,9
66,3 -5,5
, % 64,6 69,2 76,8 80,4 81,1 +16,5 +4,3
: * [9;10]; ** – , . ; *** – , %.
? ,
, 1, : ,
. . , ,
1990 . 67,2% –
32,8% , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
154
2000 ., – 90%
. 2
1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . %
1990 . 2000 .
, .
: 216,3 134,8 105,3 124,0 165,1 76,3 156,8
, . 0,9 0,5 0,3 0,5 0,4 44,4 80,0 %
0,4 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,2 -0,2 -0,2
, 123 47 21 14 12 9,8 57,1
, 2,1 1,8 2,4 2,6 2,5 119,0 104,2
,
. :
169,4* 91,4**
60,0 74,8
11,0 94,3
14,1 109,9
62,2 95,0
40,8 103,9
629,1 100,7
, . 0,6 0,3
0,2 0,3
0,0 0,3
0,0 0,5
0,0 0,4
0,0 133,3
0,0 133,3
%
0,4 0,3
0,3 0,4
0,0 0,3
0,0 0,5
0,0 0,4
-0,4 +0,1
0,0 0,1
, 112 11
26 21
0 21
1 13
2 10
1,8 90,9
- 47,6
,
2,2 1,8
1,8 1,9
0,8 2,7
1,3 2,8
1,1 2,5
91,7 138,9
137,5 92,6
: * – ;
** – .
,
, . , , 2000-2010 . 92,7 –
72,2% . , . ,
, : ,
. ,
. .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
155
,
( . 2). .
. ,
. ,
. , : « . . .
. , , , , [11, . 532]. – . ,
, . , , , ; – , , , , .» [11, .
541]. ,
. 3
1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . % 1990 . 2000 .
100
, 94 67 49 61 43 45,7 87,8
100 , 9,8 3,4 0,1 0,3 0,7 7,1 70,0
-, %:
-32,5 -12,6 -70,6 -46,9 -45,6 -13,1 -25,0
-25,4 -58,4 -100,0 0,0 - - -
. ,
, . , 2010 .
2 1,1 , : 10 2,5 .
, ,
. : « – ».
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
156
, .
3 , 1990 . , 2010 . . ,
. , – 43
, : « 1-2, » [12, . 412]. .
,
, . , .
, -
, , . ,
.
. :
- ,
.
( . 1); - 1990 – 2010 .
,
– – ( . 2); -
, 2010 . 8,5% ,
, .
, , , ,
; - ,
, « ».
, .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
157
1. . / .
// . - 3. – . 37-41. 2. . / . // .
– 2005. - 4. – . 46-52. 3. .
/ . , . . // . – 2005. - 5. – . 45-49.
4. . / . // . – 2010. – 5. – .17-21.
5. / . // : , 29. –
: , 1998. – 252 . 6. .
/ . ,
. , . , . . – .: , 2002 – 49 .
7. . / . // : . . – 2007. – 2 (140). – . 32-34.
8. . / . // . – 2011. – 7
(26) – . 184-191. 9. 2005 . / . . – , 2006. – 157 . 10. . / . .
. . – , 2011. – 174 . 11. . .6. – .:
, 1961. – 576 . 12. . .2. – .:
, 1960. – 576 .
Summary Shulskyy M.G., Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Biotechnologies
DEVELOPMENT OF BREEDING SHEEP AND GOATS STATUS IS IN ECONOMIC FORMING OF LVIV REGION
Development of sheep-breeding and goats industries of stock-raising status is investigational in the different forms of menage Lviv Region. Offer certain measures are in relation to the improvement of conduct of these industries.
– .- ., , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
158
HUMANITARIAN EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOL
378.14:379.83 ., . ©
. .
–
- , . - , -
, , . ,
. , ,
. , ,
. - ,
. ,
, .
, .
,
, , ( 1 „
"). -
. , ,
, .
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
159
- , ,
, .
: , , , ,
, - , , . -
- , ,
, , .
.
. - , ,
. ,
, , .
, .
, , , , ,
, , . , :
, , , , .
? ,
. , , ?
, .
- ( , , , .). ,
. „ !", - „ ,
, , !". , ,
. ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
160
, - , . , , ,
, , , ,
, , , .
, .
, , , ,
, : , ,
, , , .
, . , ,
, . ,
, , ,
. , (
) , , . , ,
, , , - ,
. - .
, , 57, - 63 , ,
, , , , , . 10-15 .
. , . 15
5 . . 6 , , 1 2005
46 988 . 212 . ,
- 3 , - 2,4 , - 30%, 670 . .
.
, 1989 3-5 , 2005 ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
161
, 18 , - 26. , 15
.
, ; , , ,
. .
- , , ,
, , , .
,
. . ,
, , , , .
– . ,
, . , , ,
. 1. 10-12 2.
, , ,
. 3.
. .
4. .
, . ,
, , , , ,
. , .
, .
18-28 , , 16-18
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
162
. . ,
. , .
, . , ,
, , , , , .
, , , . ,
, , , . ,
.
.
, .
, ,
. , ,
, . .
- . ,
. .
: ,
. , , .
1-2 ; 2—3 4—6 .
15-20 .
, , , ,
, , . 7 5 .
1-1,5 . .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
163
1. .
// . .2. .,1969.
2. ., . , , : 1993.
3. ., ., ., . : . – :
, 2005. 4. . . –
.: , 1985. 5. . .
.: , 1992. 6. ., ., .
: . .143-147. 7. .
8-17 : . . – .6. – .: , 1966.- .143-
147. 8. .
.// .-1967, 2.- .26-30.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
164
801.82:811.111(73).42 ., ©
. ,
. .
: , , , , , .
. , , ,
, . ,
. ,
, , , [ 2, 38 ].
, ,
. , . ,
, ,
, , -
[5, 70-71 ].
.
: . ,
. , . , . , , . , , .
.
, , © ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
165
„ ”, .
, , , , . . – ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, , , [ 6, 413].
, – , . ,
( ) ,
. , , .
, .
, ,
, ( ) , - " (ways of people ), , ,
. , , , , ,
, . , , , ,
(sames ) (differences), [7, 2-4].
, . , , , , ,
– , , , , . e
, , [3,
65-69]. " "
. , , , , ,
, ,
. , ,
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
166
, „ ” „
”). ,
, ,
. , ,
,
,
, , : , , ,
, .
: 1) , ; 2)
, ; 3) ; 4) ,
. ,
[9, 7-13]. ,
. , , . ,
, : ,
,
, .
, , . ,
, , .
1. , . 2. .
, .
1. : , , , , ?
2. , , , , , , ,
, , , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
167
.
, .
: – .
? .
; (
), , .
, ,
[ 4, 27-32].
. , ,
.
, . ,
, . . 1. –
. „ ” : ) ; ) ; ) [ 1, 27-29].
,
. , , ,
. ( ,
, ,
, ) .
, , , , ,
, . .
, , , , .
, [8, 29-30].
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
168
.
, ,
. , .
1. .
.// - 2.- .,2003.- .27-29. 2. .
// .- 4.- ., 1996.- . 38-39. 3. . . – .: , 1999.- . 65-69. 4. . -
// .- 1.- ., 2001.- . 27-32. 5. . //
.: , 1999. – . 70-71. 6. . – :
.- .: , 1990.- . 413. 7. .
// . - 26 (108).- . 2005. – . 2 -4.
8. . . //
. - 1. – ., 2004. – . 29-30. 9. // .
. – ., 1997. – . 1(3). – . 7-13. 10. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language/ Marianne Celce –
Murcia. – Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers, 1994.- P. 52-54. 11. Cooperative Language Learning: A teacher’s reference book/ Carolyn
Kessler, Ed. – Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1992. – P. 257. 12. Misztal Mariusz. Tests in English Thematic Vocabulary. – K.: ,
1999. – . 357. Summary
The article is devoted to the exploration such factors as sociocultural texts in learning foreign language by the future economists as a part of professional education in higher educational establishments. There are explained some kinds of test-tasks that help to make study more effective. Such kind and methods of study will help the future specialist to be good informed in culture and customs of English-speaking countries, so to be good communicated.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
169
: 631; 331. 4 ., ., , ., ., ,
., ., ., ., ©
. .
,
.
: ( ) – , , , OHSAS 18001,
.
, .
.
. ( ) –
,
, . , ,
– .
, ,
. :
( ) ,
. ,
( ).
, , , , , .
: - ;
© ., ., ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
170
- ; - , ; - ; - .
: -
; - ,
, ; - ; -
; - ; -
; - ; -
100%- ( ).
, .
, , ,
. ,
.
, .
, , . ,
10 2,4 , , 37%.
,
70- .
, 80%)
, 1991 , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
171
. 78%
, .
41% ,
, 23% ( ) , 36,7% .
, ,
, , ,
, . ,
OHSAS 18001 « », 1999 ,
,
. , , ,
). :
. – . – ,
. , ,
, .
: - ; - ; - ; - ; - .
, , , :
- .
. , .
: « ».
, , , ; ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
172
; , . ,
, ( ).
« » ;
- . ,
. , . ,
: ; ; ,
. , ,
, .
, , ( ,
). ;
- . « , » : «
: ». .
; - .
. , , ,
. . – ,
. :
, , , , , .
1. . . – – ,
2002 – 320 . 2. . « »
. « »: . - 1, - 2009 16. 3. WWW. OHORONAPRACI. KIEV. UA, «
», - « »: . - 2, - 2011 . 3.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
173
4. www. hwbiot. harod. ru/. . . 2011. 5. www. hbuv. gov. ua/ …41…/57. pdf .
« » 2011.
Summary PROBLEM QUESTIONS OF OPERATING CONTROL SYSTEM BY THE
GUARD OF LABOUR. It is shown that problem questions that arise up during organization of
control system by the guard of labour related first of all to imperfection of current legislation.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
174
323 ., , ©
. .
. " "
:
,
- . , XXI .,
— , , . , , ,
, . . -
– . , , , .
.
.
[5] .
, [4].
.
. , , .
« », « », [3, .5].
. — ,
, « », , , , [2, . 89-90].
, .
, , », « ». ,
.
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
175
, .
, .
, , 105/2007 «
» [5] « » [1]. ,
, . ,
, ,
. , .
, ,
. , ,
, , .
, » [4]. : ;
, ; ;
; ; .
, , ,
, ,
. 2007
, ,
, 2010-2014 « , ,
». (
, ,
, ,
, , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
176
), , (
) . - «
» ( ) .
, , , . :
, , ;
, ;
, ,
, ; ,
;
, , ;
, , ;
, ; « » ,
; , , ,
, , , ,
, ; , ,
, , , , ,
.
: , ,
; , ;
, , ;
, , ,
; ,
, , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
177
, ; ,
; ; ;
.
. :
; 2010-2014 « ,
, »;
, , , ).
:
, ,
, , ,
, , .
,
. ,
, ,
, .
. 2011 ) – -
, ,
, ,
,
; 2012 . ,
, . (2012-2014 ) - 2010-2014 « , ,
», ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
178
( 2015 ) .
,
. , , ,
, , , , ,
. ,
, ,
, .
, , , .
. : , ;
, , ,
; , .
, ,
.
1. « » / . : (http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=964-15).
2. . . , , / , . . // . — 2003. — 8. — . 89—90
3. // . . — 3 (53). —
.: , 2004. — 185 . 4. .
/ . : http://www.niss.gov.ua/ content/ articles/files /proj ect-Litvinenko-dccO 8 .pdf
105/2007 « » / . : http://www.president.
gov.ua/documents/5728.html
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
179
., ©
.
. , , .
, .
: , , , , .
.
, . , , . , ,
.
, . , ,
, . — , 2
: , , ( ). ,
, . ,
. . “ –
, . – , ,
– .” (4, . 19). .
, – ,
. ( . 1) ,
, – . .
“ – , . ”(2, . 7)
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
180
1. ,
, . ,
, , . –
, . “ ” . ,
, , —“ ".
, , , .
, . (revenue - profit), (to
buy – to sell), (manage – manager ). ,
. , .
. , , . , .
. , . ,
, . ,
, , , .
– , , . ,
. “ , , ,
” (1, .251). ,
. , ,
: ., ., ., . – ,
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
181
, , . ,
, : hammer, gap, debt, agency , advice. , , ,
. – , .
, .( . 2) , .
. 2. ,
) , . , ,
, . , – ,
. , .
– , ,
( ), .
, .
,
. ,
. income, (income – money that you earn from
your job or that you receive from investment). money that you earn from you job receive from investments,
. .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
182
. 3. income
, income 1) 2 : money that you earn from you job receive
from investments. 2) 4 2 : money that you earn , job, receive, investments 2 3 : money, earn.
– - , ,
. .
, , ,
. , .
.
, – , . ,
. ,
. . ,
, .
1.
. – . , 1974. – 367 . 2. . . . – .
, 1977. – 167 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
183
3. . . – . ,1974. – 201 . 4. . // , 1970. - 1 - .
19-32. Summary
This article investigates term and its main linguistic features. Such phenomena as term field and system and correlation between term, concept and meaning are shown. The method of net modeling and its practical application was paid attention to.
Key words: term, system, meaning, concept, net modeling, decomposition.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
184
35.073.6 ., ©
« »
(1917-1991 .)
,
. : , ,
, , , , .
.
. , ,
. .
, ,
, , , .
. .
, ,
, . ,
. , . , . , . , . .
1917 . 1991 .
.
. ,
, , ,
, .
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
185
, ,
. ,
, , , –
. , .
.
1917 . . 1917
1910 . 14 1924 .
– , 283 .
,
, , [1, . 96].
1924 . :
; –
; ; – .
.
20-
. 1922 1928 . , ,
, . 19 1928
, 36 [4, .1]. ,
1924 ., , ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
186
20- -30
. ) 1930 .
. .
, .
5 1964 .
, , -
. " " " ",
, , .
1964 ,
.
1928 . 1964 ,
. ,
.
27 1981 . [2, . 101].
,
9 1982 . 1985 .
. " ".
, 12 1986 .
, , ,
. , ,
, V
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
187
1986 1991 . .
. , .
. .
. 90-
, , , ,
. 16 1990 .
, , ,
. 1990
( 26 1990 . 601-XII),
( 25 1991 . 996- ).
.
26 1991 . [3]. ,
: – – .
. .
, . 1 “ ” : ”
.
”.
. .
11 1991 1
– .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
188
12 1991 .
. . , ,
. .
.
« », .
.
. , , , ,
. ,
, , , .
1. . / .
// , 1987. – . 96. 2. . – 1981 .– 17. – . 101. 3. . – 19 1991. – 93. 4. , 1929. – 1. – . 1.
Summary For centuries custom has been one of the most essential factors of statehood
and independence, striking evidence of the power and financial sovereignty.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
189
168.522.000:372.8:811.124:378.4 . ., ©
.
. : , , , , ,
.
, , ,
, , , , .
, ,
, .
, , ,
. ,
– , , , , , , , ,
). –
. , , , , ,
, , . , , , ,
, .
, , , ,
.
© . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
190
, .
. , ,
. . .
, , ,
.
VIII . . , , ,
. VIII . ,
, . VII – VIII .
-: , , , , .
, ”, ” ” .
. , ,
, , , . . [1, c.
412], :” , ”. ,
. , XIX – XX ., ,
, , , , , ,
, , . , , . , “ ” [1, c. 399],
, .
, , .
, , . ,
, . , ,
” , , .
. : “
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
191
, . , , ,
, ” [3, c. 97].
: , . ( ) – ( .
Autem cultura animi philosophia), , , , ,
. , [4, . 6],
.
. ,
( , , , , , , , ).
. , , , ,
. ,
, , , , .
. – ,
.
, , . XVIII . (1651 – 1715) : “
… , ” [5, c. 157]. . – ,
, . ,
, “ ” , ,
. , , , .
: “ – , ”. , , .
.
90- . – , ,
. , , [6, c. 3], ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
192
, . ,
, , . , ,
. , ,
, , , . . ,
. , ,
, , , “ ”. ,
. – ,
, . : “Amicus Plato, sed magis
amica veritas” (“ – , ”).
. ,
. “ ” : “
, , …”[2, c. 203].
– ,
, , ,
. : 1) ; 2)
; 3) ; 4) ( -).
,
. , ratio ( ), cultura ( ), spiritus ( ), usus
), processus ( ) . ,
.
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
193
.
, , –
.
1. . : 2- . – : , 1973.
2. . . // . . . . – ., 2000. 3. . . . –
: , 2003. 4. .
XVI – XVIII ./ . . . . . . – .: . , 1999. – 104 .
5. . – : , 2001. 6. . . – .: , 2001.
Summary
This article is devoted to the inexhaustible humanitarian potential of the Latin course as a good basis for a progressive change in the spiritual life of the university education.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
194
631.3 : 681.3 ., , ,
., , ©
.
,
.
: , ,
, , .
. , ,
,
.
, .
. ,
, , ,
[1]. ,
.
, , [2]. ,
, ,
[3]. .
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
195
, .
. :
( ), , .
. ( ) .
, , . ,
. .
.1. – , , ( =0)
, , , ( ).
.1.
,
. .2 .
( . .2).
,
.
?
= = 0
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
196
.
.
.2. .
; (« », « »),
.
. , .
, , : = 1 + 2 + 3,
1, 2, 3 – , ,
, , .
1-
?
= = 0
2-
?
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
197
, :
1 = 11 + 12 + … + 1n1 ;
2 = 21 + 22 + … + 2n2;,
3 = 31 + 32 + … + 3n3 , j – ,
( = 1,2,3); j – ; n1, n2, n3 – , ,
.
Visual Basic – 6. , .
,
( . . 3).
. 3. .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
198
, . ,
, . , ,
( . . 4).
. 4. -
.
, ( . . 5). ,
, , .
( . . 5); ,
; .
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
199
. 5.
. ,
,
1. ., ., .
. – .: « », 1998. – 115 . 2.
: / . . – .: , 1992. – 144 .
3. «
»: / . , . , . , . . – , 2009. – 112 .
Summary
Kozij B.I., Drach M.P. Computer system of professional students training level valuation on
clinical diagnosis of animals diseases Computer system of students knowledge control is proposed with the help of using test tasks of many levels, which simulate the process of veterinary doctor decision during the diagnosis of animals diseases. The system also provides for training possibility of students during self-reliant work. Key words: educational process, veterinary medicine, knowledge control< computer, information system.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
200
111:504.7 . ., , ©
. ., ,
. . .
:
– , ,
’ ,
. :
, , .
, , .
.
– , .
, .
. .
, , , , .
,
.
, . .
, – .
. “ ” ,
. ,
.
© . ., . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
201
“ ”
, , , , .
,
, - .
,
, .
.
. , , , ,
, .
. ,
, , , .
, – . ,
, ,
, . .
, .
, .
, , , , .
, , , .
. ,
. ,
,
, ). ,
, .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
202
,
. .
, , , . , . , .
. –
, .
.. . , .
, .
, . .
.
.
. .
.
. . ,
, .
, . . :
( - ), (paradeigma- ; ), (cluster-
), , . ,
; , . ,
, .
, , . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
203
, .
, , : ; , ,
; ;
; ; ; ;
. , .
: – . ,
.
1. . . , . , . . : . .- : , 2005.
2. . . : .- .: , 1997 ,-271 .
3. . . . . V
/ . . . – .: ,2004.-418 . 4. . , . . , . , . . :
. . – ,2003.-334 .
Summary Kostenko V. G., Fedyshyn Y. I.
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj
PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE: DIALECTICS OF THE CORRELATION AND INTERDEPENDENCE .
Science philosophy searches science as special form of spiritual activity of the society.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
204
111:504.7 . ., , , ©
. ., ,
. . .
“ ”
( ) , , .
: , , , , .
– . ,
. . ?
? , ? ? ?
? ? ?
? , , ?
( ) …. , .
“ – , ,
, , , ”. “ , ,
, ” , . ,
. . ,
.
. .
. , : -
, -, , .
, , , ,
© . ., . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
205
”.
. “
. “ , , , ,
”
”. , , .
, ,
, . ,
: “ ? C
. “ ” . ,
. - .
.
, . ,
. ,
,
(“… , .”). ,
, .
, .
, , . . , ,
, , , . , ,
. : “ -
, , , - .”
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
206
, , .
. . , .
“ ” , , . .
– . .
. – .
- , - . , -
, – , . ,
.
: , , , , , , ,
, ( , .), , .
. . ,
. , “
“. – . .
, .
. ,
, . – .
, . ,
. .
: =
, , .
. . : , , , .
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
207
, , , .
. . ?
? , . .
- . , , .
, ” ” ( ). : .
, . .
, : . , , – , ,
“ ”, - ,
. , , , ,
– , .
1. . ., .3, .,1981, .136-137. 2. Prigogine I.The Philosophy of Instability.Futures.August,1989, p.397.
Summary The article is dedicated to articulation question about nature and essence of
substance.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
208
: 291.8 ., ©
: , .
: , , , , , .
, , , -
. , , , , « »
, « – », « » . , « »
. , [1, 2]
– , , , , ,
[ .: . 2, 7; 6, 3; . 27, 50; . 8, 9; . 2, 11; 2, . 130]. « » ,
, , , [3].
, – . ,
, : – – [4].
( ), , .
( ), , , (s ma, psych , nous), , ,
[4]. , , ,
, : .
, . , , ,
: « , » (2 . 1, 4).
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
209
. « » (…) [2, . 124].
, , , , .
, ,
, (nephes) (ruah) , , , ,
: – « », ; – », ; , « » ,
. ( , ) .
, [4].
, [ . 1, 26].
[5] , « » :
1) , ;
2) , ( . 2);
3) , , ;
4) , , ;
5) , « », ( . 2);
6) . , , , ,
: « , – , , » [ . 19, 2]. , ,
, , : « , » [ . 5, 48].
, ,
. , , , , .
, , .
, , , .
. , , [ .: . 16, 13] , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
210
, . , , . ,
, , ,
. [ . 5, 9], - « »! [ . 20, 19], –
. , , : «
» [ . 15, 33]. , ,
, : « – , – . , , –
. » [ . 15, 5]. : « ,
, - » [ . 15, 8]. , , ,
, , . , , , , ,
? , : « (…)» [ . 6, 9].
: « : (…)» [ .
3, 16].
, - , , , ,
. , : « ,
; » [ . 1, 15]. ,
. , , ,
[5]. ,
: « ; , , » [ . 11, 12].
, ? , , –
: « , , (…)» [ . 11, 25]. : « , , ,
, , » [ . 11, 27]. , : « ,
» [ . 11, 28].
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
211
! !
: « , ,
. » [ . 11, 29-30]. ,
, ,
[5]. , , , – . , ,
[5].
. « » 11
2008 , « », ,
, ,
, , . , ,
, – , [5].
2011 « – »,
: , .
. , .
, [2, . 704].
. , ,
[2, . 8]. , , , ,
[1, 2]. , .
, , ,
. . «
», ( .: . 13, 33) [2, . 705].
, (…)
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
212
, [2, . 708].
.
, . [2, .746].
, , : « , », ,
, [2, . 313]. , , ,
, . – . ,
. – , (…).
, [2, . 710]. .
, – , – , [2,
. 711]. ,
. , , ( )
.
) . , , . , ,
. , , , , . – , .
. 1.
– , .
2. ;
, , ,
. 3. ,
, .
4. .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
213
5. [ .: . 1, 16-17; 2, . 46], ( ) [2, . 771]
.
1. / – . , 3- . -« », 2007.
2. : – . – : , 2011. -336 .
3. . . . . . . , . – : , 2010. -992 .
4. ., . / . . , . – : , 2006. -144 .
5. / / . . , , , . – : , 2012. – 200 .
Summary
Krupnyk Ya.G. Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN BEING TO THE ADVANTAGE
OF CHURCH DOGMA Based on Church dogma about human being and its spiritual life, the main
aspects of spiritual development of human: spiritual, scientific and practical are observed.
Key words: God, Jesus Christ, Spirit Saint, Church, human, spiritual development.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
214
658:631.3:619 ., ., ., . ©
, , ,
– – .
: , , , , , .
, ,
, .
: – ; – ; – ; – ,
. :
– , ; – ; – .
? , ,
.
. – ,
, . , , ,
. – ,
© ., ., ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
215
.
. , , , , ,
.
: – ; – , ; – ; – ; – , ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – .
. ,
– . , ,
, .
, .
. – –
, : – ; – , , ; – ; – ; – .
, , , .
, – – . ,
, . ,
. . , ,
. ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
216
, , , .
.
, , : , , , , , –
, , . , .
– . , – . ,
. , ,
. – .
, , , , ,
, . ,
. – ( ,
, , , , , , ). ,
, , .
, ,
, , ,
. ,
, , .
: – ; – ( ); – ; – , ( ); – ; – ; – , .
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
217
, , .
1. .
. – ., 2006. – 311 . 2. . . – .: , 2000. –
112 . 3. / ., .,
. – .: , 2005. – 440 . 4. . : . . – . – ., 2002. – 223 . 5. .
: . . – : . , 1991. – 224 .
Summary The article lucidly revealed important side of marketing, as a special area of
economics that deals with sales of veterinary appointment, the role of incentives and motivation, the most common and mandatory aspects of contacts and cooperation between customers - pet owners and service providers - implement it products.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
218
808.51:81’373.7 ., . ©
.
, ,
. : , ,
, , .
. - , , , , , , .
, , : . ,
, , . ,
, , , , – ,
, , . , ,
, , , , , ,
, . , , , ,
, .
, , ,
, V : ,
( ) , ,
. ,
, , .
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
219
, . : , , , . .
. ,
; , : -, -, -, -, : , , , , , .
: , - , - , - , - . : , , , , ,
, , . ,
, : – , : , , , , ; – : ,
; – , , ; , : , , .
, ,
. , , , , .
, , , , ,
- , .
, , , . , «
, , » [6, 10].
, , , .
, , .
– . ,
, , , , , .
, . « » «
», « », « », « », « », « », « », « » . . –
. – , , .
, , , .
, , –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
220
. – , , .
. , –
, , . , « » - « », «
» », « » « »;
, » - « »; « , » - « »; » -
» . ,
, , , , .
-,
, . , « » « », « »-
», « »-« »,» »-« »,»
»-« ». . : «
, , . , , , ,
, . , » [ .
9, 60]. , ,
, , , . , ,
, , . – , .
– , » [1, 28].
. « , ,
, ,
».
, , , ,
; ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
221
; . .
.: – ; , ;
; – . . . ,
.
, , . ,
“ ”, ;” ”, , ” .
: -
; - ; ; - ; - ;
- ; - ; - .
:
- ; , .
, , -
: , – , , , –
, . - ,
, ,
. , , , ,
; ; – ;
. .
,
, : ; ; ; ; ; , ;
; . . . , : ), ),
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
222
( ), ( ), ( ), ( .
, , .
: ) ; , ; ; ; ) , :
; ; ) ; : ; ; ) , : ; ; .
: ; ; .
, : “ ”, “
”,” ”, ”, “ ” .
. , ” ”. .
, , , ,
- , .
, , , « 12» ( ): , .
[4,42] - , ; :
[4,82, 85]. -
, - , :
, (« ») [10, , 321] ; , ( ) [10, , 324];
(« ») [10, , 223]; , , («
..») [10, , 351].
, , ,
– .
1. . . . . - , 1982.
2. . . – . , 1997, 11-12, . 26-29.
3. . . , 1997, 5-6, . 21.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
223
4. . . : 1983. 5. . . .
, 1997, 1, . 8-13. 6. . . . : ,
1988. 7. . .
, 1981, 9, . 60-63. 8. . .1-111. : 1963.
Summary Researches deals with the new and interesting from the point of view of lexicology
problem of the role of phraseological units of Bible origin in the art of oral speaking.The article describes wide usage of words with prefixes and suffixes of old Slavonic origin.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
224
: 329:339 321:011. 5 . ., , . ., ©
.
1929-39 .
,
. .
: , , .
,
. :
, , . , . , . , . 1929
. , . .
[6]
, , [6].
, .
[7]. , 1917-23 .,
[3]. , , ,
. , . , ,
,
© . ., . ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
225
: , , – [1].
, .
5 1929 . . , 1- .
, . , -
, ,
, . . , –
– ,
. .
, ,
. , 1- , 14- 1929 . .
1- [4]. ,
.
. . ,
, . [8].
, ,
.
-
, , 1917-23 . .
, . .
, ,
, . ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
226
.
, ,
. , . ,
: – – .
,
,
.
. . ( ( )) [5].
, . . ,
, , [6].
, , ,
.
, ,
[2]. ,
.
. . ,
, . , ,
. 1-
, , , , , -
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
227
1. . // : ( ). ., 1996 360 . 2. , - 1974 . 210 3. . // . . . 1. , 2001. 348 . 4. . . 1940 .. 260 . 5. , 1994 601 . 6. « » 1, 1968 .
505 . 7. . 1929-1939 ,
2010 210 . 8. . ,
, 2005. . 22
Summary Paranyak P.R., Kostenko V.G.
This article analysis question of employee Organization ukrainian nationalists with democracy countries in Europe and America. This question is very actual today because OUN was illegal organization, and their main task was regeneration independence Ukrainian state and returning ethnic regions. Development this question will help to solve immemorial conflict between Poland and Ukraine.
Key words: Versailles-Washingtonian system of agreements, Advice of of the Entente, pacification.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
228
341.43:94(477)„192” ., . . ., ©
„ ”
20- . .
20- . .
, . ,
. : , ,
, .
. 20-30- .
. ,
. , ,
.
, .
,
, .
,
.
20- , .
. ,
, „ ” .
, .
, , : ,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
229
. , ,
. . . ,
: , , , . 1991 :
, , ,
, . ,
20- . . .
. 1915 ,
,
- [10, .. 10].
,
. [11, . 14]. ,
, , , 20- .
20- . , ,
. , ,
. ,
„ ”, „ ”, „ ”, „ ”, ”.
. . „ , ,
, : , , ”[1, .462]. ,
, . ,
. , ,
( ). 23 1920 . „
”. , 4 1921 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
230
, , . .
„ …
”[3, .72]. , , .
,
, , ,
1919 . 91- -
, 10 1919 . -, , , ,
[5, . 49]. 30 1921 .
. „ ”. , ,
, , [5, .58].
, .
, ”. „ ”, . .
„ ”.
1867 . 1922 350 , 290 [6, . 1].
, „ ” : , . ( 30 )
, 20 [6, . 2].
„ ” , . ,
. , , . , . [2, . 127]. ,
, .
, 1919 .
[8, . 3]. , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
231
.
, . , 1921-1922 . 13 ,
[4, . 44]. , 1920-1922 . „ ”,
.
. ,
, . , . ,
. , . ,
, .
.
” . [9, . 267]. 1922 . .
1921-1922 . .
1 1921 „ ”
. , , .
, , -, -
. 1922 .
. , . 1923 . .
. , ,
[9, . 285]. ,
, , , , . -
.
. , . , . .
.
. . 1921
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
232
, 17 [6,
. 11]. ,
. , .
. , , 1921 . 315 .
, . , 12 3
, . , . , . , . , . , . [7, . 100].
, .
. ,
.
, .
. ,
. , ,
. ( 1945 .).
1922-1925 . .
, , , . ,
4 . , .
,
. ,
. , 30-
. . ,
, .
, , . , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
233
, . ,
, . ,
, , , . , ,
. , .
1917-20 , ,
, . .
, , .
, , ,
, , .
. .
, .
, . -
. -
, ,
, .
1. . (1914 1920).
: . , 1969. 542 . 2. . „ ” // -
1991 : ”, 1990. 256 .
3. . , 1917-1921. .: , 2003. 607 .
4. . (1819-1991). .: , 1994. 320 .
5. . . .: „ ”, 1994. 260 .
6. ( ). . 4465, . 1, . 26.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
234
7. . . 3859, . 1, . 134. 8. . (
. ). . 1233, . 1, . 66. 9. . . . 1235, . 1, . 266. 10. . (
. ). . 399, . 1, . 1. 11. . . . 746, . 1, . 1.
Summary Plazova T.I.
Question of Ukrainian political emigration in Austria of the 20-th years XX century are explorer and analyzed. At this period the national liberation movement suffered the biggest defeat, Ukrainians warriors was forced to leave their legacy inheritance and move to the foreign country. The article analyzes strength, social status and activity of Ukrainian political emigration.
Key words: Ukrainian emigration, national liberation movement, social status, strength.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
235
378:636.611 ., ., ©
. : , , , ,
, , , , , , , .
,
. , ,
, , - , , , ,
, , . : , ,
, , , , .
, – »
.
, , .
.
.
, .
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
236
– , ,
(1).
.
. – , ,
, , , , .
, ,
(2,3).
– . ,
,
. –
,
,
, . ,
,
. - ,
, , [4].
,
.
, : , ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
237
, (5).
« »
,
.
. : , , , .
, 2006-2007 ,
, ,
.
,
: 1.
. 2.
. 3. . 4. ,
. ,
, .
, ,
. ,
, , , ,
.
: 1.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
238
2.
. 3. ,
, , , ,
.
4.
. 5.
.
: 1. . // .,
. – 2006. - 6. – . 7-13. 2. . // . – 1999. - 1. – . 3. – . 19-40.
3. . . //
, 21 2005 . – .: , 2005. – .1 – . 28-34.
4. / .: . . – .: .., 2000. – 380 .
5. . – // .,
. .- 2006, 6. – .- 38-41.
Summary Prysyazhnyuk V.Ya., kandidat of sciens veterinary, docent
Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnologies named after S.Z. Gzhytskyi/
The article lights the problem of the methodical providing of independent work of students on condition of the use of the credit-module departmental teaching, and ways of its decision, which are offered on the example of one of normative disciplines.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
239
: 903.25 . ([email protected]) ©
, ,
. . -.
.
,
, , . , ,
.
: . , : . ) ,
[10, . 1].
. :
1: . -
II [11, . 203]. .
[6, . 53]. . 14
. 17 .
19 , . 24 ,
, . 29 , .
.
, . II – . III . . ,
, I – II . . [14, s. 56] , , ,
. , ,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
240
I – II . [3, . 359], . ,
. ,
, [8, . 153]. , ,
, .
2: . , .
[6, 54]. , 3, 5, 6, 28, 42 ,
, .
.
. II – . III . .. ,
. II – III . . , , V . .
,
. ,
, . 3: .
D . 24.
. , , ,
, [14, s. 76]. , .
I II . . ,
, . ,
, . , [9, . 27].
, . .
. 8 , – 6,5 . [6, . 54].
( . 61), – ( . 29).
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
241
, . , .
.
, [14, s. 66]. [13, s. 60] .
, ,
. ,
. , . . II – . . III . .
. , , .
. ( 5-6) , .
, . , ,
. .
. 1: .
. . . .
, , , , , .
. ,
. , .
. , . , .
, . ,
. , , , .
. ,
[6, . 19]. ,
– [5, . 105].
, [2, . 174].
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
242
.
, , . . III . . .
, III . . .
. , I – II . ., II .
, .
II – III . . III . [1, . 121].
2: , , ,
. .
[4, . 155] [7, . 60] .
, [12, . 175].
, . , ,
8-9 5,8-7 . . 8 .
, . .
, . ,
IV . V . .
IV – . V . . IV . . .
. ,
. . ,
, , , ,
. , . ,
. , .
, .
, , . –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
243
, – . ,
.
.
1. . . .
. – , 1981. – 264 . 2. . //
. . – 116. – , 1964. – .173-175.
3. . . - , 2008. – 472 . 4. ., ., . . . – , 1999. – 128 .
5. . ., ., . ( ). – , 2004. – 235 .
6. . . – , 1980. – 130 . 7. . ( .
. ) // . – , 1975. – 18. – . 51-61. 8. . . //
. – , 1969. – 1. – . 147-159. 9. .
// . . – , 2000. – .35-36. – .13-31.
10. ., . . .
: . – . 14 – , 2011. 11. . //
. – , 2008. – . 11. – . 195- 208. 12. . : , . –
, 2005. – 592 . 13. Chmielowska A. Grzebienie staro ytne i redniowieczne z ziem
polskich.- ódz, 1971. – 160 s. 14. Thomas S. Studien zu den Germanischen Kammen der Romischen
Kaiserzeit.// Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte zur sachsischen Bodendenkmalpflege. – Leipzig, 1960. – B.8. – S.53-120.
Summary The article discusses the distribution, typological characteristics and
chronology of bone combs found on settlements and cemeteries Vielbark culture in the first half I thousand BC in Dniester- Pripjat interfluve. Briefly described value and use of combs in the then society.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
244
796.011.3 ., . ©
.. .
, .
, , ,
. , ,
, , . ,
.
. , ,
. - , , . , ,
. .
. , 2- 3-
. ,
, , .
. .
, , , .
: , , ( . ).
« ». ,
. ,
, , , .
?
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
245
- . ,
. , . ,
( ).
. , .
, . ,
. , .
. - « », « » .
. « , , ,
, », — . . . ,
. , . . ,
, , . - 8-10 .
, . 2- — 5-7 ; 2 3- — 10
; 3-5 - 15 ; 5 7-20 . - .
, . , , .
, ,
. 8-12 . « » 8 12 ,
- 8 11. , , ,
. , . , , .
, , .
, : , - ; ,
. ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
246
». « » -. , 85-90
70-75 11-12 . 21-26 18-20 . 7 9
. ,
. 11-12 ,
. .
. 8-12 .
. 8 11 , ,
. ,
, , , .
« ». , .
. , « » .
, . 100-150
. 10-15 .
( « »).
, , , .
- , , .
. ,
. , , « » -
. ,
.
: -
;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
247
- , ;
- , , ; - ; ,
; - ; - ; -
. .
). 13 16 . - 12 15.
- 11 18 , 13-14 .
. 28 (60 %), 21 (28 %), 30-35 (10-12
%). 3-6 . 28- : — 1-5 ; - 19-23;
- 24-27. , , , . ,
. ,
. .
, , , , , .
, . .
« » 12-13 , - 14-15. 90-97%
. , , .
17-18 . .
. - , , .
. . .
, .
18-20 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
248
. .
, .
, .
, . ,
: - , ,
; -
( , ); - , ,
, ; - ,
; -
; - : , ,
, , ;
- . 60 , 4 – 30-45 , 25-30 . . : - 22-35
21-35 ; - 36-60 ( .) 36-55 ( .) . .
1- (25-35 ). 21-25 - ! , , ,
, . , ... , .
. - . , 21
, . ,
, . 85%
22 46 . . ( ) 34
. 36 . .
35 1953 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
249
, , 1953
. , ,
( , ), - , , ( , , ).
, , ,
25-26 . 35 , ,
. 5. ,
. - .
36-60 . , , ,
... : , , ; , ... , , ,
. , , , . « — ,
- - ...» ? ,
. . , 86% 90-100
. , .
. : .
. ? ,
, , . ,
- , .
, , , : - ; - , (50-60 ) ; - ,
; - ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
250
- , , ,
; - ;
- , ;
- , ;
- ; - ; - ,
.
, .
1. ., .
. // ». 1985- 10- .45-47.
2. ., . . // -2990-
11- .18-21. 3. .
. //
.1992. 4. ., . .-
: , 1988. 5. ., .,
. , 1986-143 . 6. . . , 1999-
.47, 296.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
251
619(47+57)(091)”19” ., , ,
, .
1917-1921 .
1917-1921 . , .
. B
- , – .
, - .
: , , , .
.
, ,
. , ,
, .
, , . , .
, ,
. .
, . . -
. , , .
. (1914-1917 .) .
[1]. ,
, , .
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
252
. ,
, , , , , .
, [2].
,
. ,
.
, 1917 . , , , , , ,
, , , , .
1917-1918 . 500 . .
B 1920 . , , , , , , ,
, 43 635 . , - , -
, , , , , - . , 1920 .
18 [3]. 1921 . 24 , 95 3060 .
, [4].
; .
1917 . , . [5].
, .
, .
,
.
: –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
253
; – ; –
; - . , [6,7].
, , ,
. B 1918 .
,
. .
.
, ,
.
.
, 1918 . . 56 .
1918 .
. . ., ,
.
1918 . .
, , ;
,
,
". , ,
. , 1851-
1852 ., ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
254
, . 1864 .
, ,
[8]. ,
, , ,
, –
. , , ,
, , ,
, .
, ,
; ,
, ;
;
; ,
; ;
, , .
. . 1.
. .
2. ,
. , .
1. ., ., .
. . . / . . – .: », 2002. – 384 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
255
2. 1916 // . – 1916. –
1. – . 3-4. 3. . / . . – .:, 1954. –
430 . 4. . ., . . / . . –
.:, 1988. – 128 . 5.
262 27.08.1917 . // . . – .163., . 11., . 11. – . 11-12.
6. . . / . . – .:, . – 1977. – 344 .
7. . 30 1917 . // . – 1918. – .2. – .
19-21. 8. . / .
. – 1913. - 6. – . 271-286
Summary Investigated the history of development of veterinary medicine of Ukraine at the
1917-1921 years. It is set, that the World War I almost completely stopped the work of veterinary stuff. The origin of amount growth of veterinary stuff in the country by the period of the authority establishment was the complicated epizootic situation. In the described period, activity of veterinary organization was under the most important task – to eliminate the contagious disease, firstly to eliminate plague of cattle. Epizootics covered the territory of almost all Soviet Union, what made the authorities to organize the legislature of veterinary medicine – Central veterinary department of Public Commissary of internal affairs.
Key words. History aspects, veterinary medicine, epizootic, veterinary direction, veterinary department.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
256
378.1 ., , ©
.
, ! –
. , . , .
. “ ” – . , , , …
. “ ” ( )
. , . – .
: “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, ”, „ ”, “ ”, “
”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, ”, “ ”, „ : !”, “ ”, –
, , – , , ,
, . ( –
) 1 – . , , , ,
, , , – . . ! ,
. , ,
... ? , ,
? , , .
, , , ,
. : – .
, . © ., 2012
1 – . . „ ”, ,
. – .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
257
, , , . , ,
, – 2 , ,
. … , . ,
, : “ ” – . , , , .
, .
: - , , ;
- ; - .
, , ;
. – .
, . ,
, . ,
, , , . :
, . , , …
. , , : .
– , .
, ,
, , , , –
« », : .
, : . , . , ,
. :
2 „ ”, „ ”, „ ”,
”, „ ”, – . – .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
258
, ,
.
– , , , ,
, , , .
, , , :
, , – , . ,
, , , ,
; ( ) ,
, , – .
.
, , ,
, ( , ) ( , ,
, ), , , , , – . , , aprior
. : ,
. , , , , , –
, , . ,
, .
: ,
– , . ,
.
, , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
259
: . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –
398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).
Summary
V.M.Tyshchenko Lviv National Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj
PHENOMENON OF PROFESSION Quite a bit specialists work on the departments of the Ukrainian institutes of
higher, whose work is marked deep knowledge of object, organic internal unity, ponderable argumentation, brightness and penetrating. Will mark: such teachers there will be majority, and exactly they determine the state of domestic institute of higher studies on the whole. But is, unfortunately, and opposite cases.
Against failures nobody is insured. In the profession of teacher, as well as in any other, appropriate successes and failures : it is dialectics of human activity as such. Distresses other - when noticeable successes during great while are not quite, and expectation of them acquires utopian character gradually.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
260
378.1 ., , ©
.
:
,
, . .
, , .
, – , , .
, , , , . . (
) – , . .
... , , .
, .
,
. , ,
. , , ,
, verbo, .
.
, , , , , – (
) , . – -IV .
. , ,
. . – .
. , , .
, . ,
© ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
261
. , .
, , , ;
, , – .
– , , , .
, , , ,
, , , –
,
. , , .
, .
, . .
: . ,
, . , ,
. . ( ) ,
, .
, , ,
. , , ( – ) ,
, . , ,
– “ -”, ,
. , ,
. , , – ,
. , , , .
, . , ,
, . :
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
262
. , ,
. – . ,
. : .
. ( , ,
) , .
( , ) – . , ,
. , .
. – . , ,
. , ,
. .
, ,
, , : . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –
398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).
Summary
V.M.Tyshchenko Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj TEACHING At HIGHER SCHOOL: DIALECTICAL ASPECT
Listeners perceive Word. A word - a sound only. But a sound is this unique. He contains maintenance the volume of which is determined only in each, to the separately taken case. The professionals of institute of higher department try to avoid diffuse concepts, and that is why go an associative verbal row. Possibly, doing it historians more easily. More easily to create in an audience a verbal picture the bright strokes of which sometimes give almost physical reality to the events. Most teachers of historical disciplines are able not only to tell about the past but also show with the help of His Majesty of Word of epoch, event, people; enter present young people in the mysterious remoteness of centuries, to pass in verbal paints that which must not forever drip in - the ominous underground river of oblivion.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
263
378.1 ., , ©
.
: ,
– , , , ... .
. , , , –
? , – : ,
– . , , – , , .
, „ ”. . ,
, . , , .
, , .
, .
– . , ,
. 3
: “ ” – . .
, , . .
... – , . , ...
, !
, , , :
! , , …
: , , , ,
!
© ., 2012 3 . .: . .
. . – : , 2005. – . 69-72.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
264
! ,
;
. ,
, ... , ?
! . :
– .
, , , , . , , .
, , . , , , „ ”
, , .
, , , ,
. ,
. , , ,
, – ( !) . ,
, .
,4
. , ,
.
, .
, ,
: ,
, . ,
. . ,
, .
, , ...
, , – .
, .
,
, –
, , , . – , ,
... , !
– .
4 . . :
. – , 1990. – . 12,13. . .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
265
*** – ,
.
. ,
.
. ,
, ,
.
, , .
, .
, , .
– .
, – ,
.
...5
, ,
, – . ,
. ,
– . ,
– ? ? ?
– ! ,
. ,
.
...
, – ,
: .
. “ ” –
. :
, , ? ,
. ,
. –
.
, . , , ,
, .
. , , . ,
. : „ !
!” , , „ ” , – , , .
, . , , ,
( , ) , .
5 . – . – : , 1992. – . 146.
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
266
, . ,
. , , ,
, .
. .
, , , , ,
. , ,
-.
, , , , – – .
.
, , , ,
: . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –
398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).
Summary V.M.Tyshchenko
Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj
AUXILIARY LITERARY EXERCISES AS METHOD OF IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LANGUAGE
Will specify at once: the article does not contain asseveration, that the teachers of Institutes of higher for the improvement of writing word need necessarily mother of skill in especially literary genres - publicism, translations, prose, poetries.. Will count it by the matter of free choice.
But there is information for reflections. Own translations, own poetic search, own publicism materials, - or will name them superfluous for our professional arsenal? Probably, - vice versa: the additional linguistic enriching will be useful for a specialist the basic working instrument of which is exactly a language - verbal and writing. The last requires a high-quality technique, and, - permanent, scalene training, including on the especially literary field.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
267
141. 7. ., ,
, © ., .
,
. , 1)
“ ” ( ), 2) ( “ ”) 3)
(“ ” “ ” ). ,
, .
: , - ( “ ” “ ”), ,
( ) , ,
) . .
. : , , ,
, ( ) ,
, .
( )
, ( . .) ( .
.) [9, 455].
. , , -
, . . [7].
1974 ., ,
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
268
1977 ., (“ ”,
), 1982 ., ( )
1989 ., , – 1994 .,
[7], – , . .,
, [10, 283-285].
( , 1858 ., 1913 ., . 1921 ., . 2003 .
.) . . “ ”: “ ” ( , , , , . ,
, , .), ( – -
– – . 1974 . – 1976, 1979 .), . .
1977 .) , , , , , , , ,
“ ” ., , ( ,
.), ( .), ( , ,
, , , , , , , , , , .),
. . .- , ,
, , , , , ( 1994 .) . [10, 283-285],
, 1) ” ( ), 2) ( ) –
( “ ”) 3) (“ ” “ ” ) [10, 284].
( – , ) ( ,
, , .) ( , , , “ ”)
, 1993 . . (
), ( ) – [7; 10, 284].
1960-1980- .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
269
( ) [9, 456], , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , .
. , , ,
-
, “ ”, , “ ” ,
-.
( , 1992 .), -
( , 1985 .), ( , 1983 .),
, , ( , 1991 .),
( , 1992 .), , ,
( , 1985 .), ( , 1983 .), : , , , ,
, 1992 .), , 1991 .) , , ( “
” 1983 . ) “ ” [4, 182]. , , , “
… ” [4, 192], : “ …
, … . … , , “ ” –
“ ”… . …
, , ” [2, 154-155] .
, 1991 . [3], 1996 .
[5]. 1998, 2000 ., ,
, , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
270
[1, 29-36]. 2000
., , ,
, . , ,
[6, 3-4]. 2003, 2004 .,
, ,
, [8, 37-43]. 2003 .,
. -
, ( 1995 .)
( , , , , , ,
, , , , , .) ( , , ,
, .), [8, 182-183; 10].
. . , , ,
, “ ” , ( , .
) 1982 ., . 1998 .,
” ( ) . “ ” 2002 . “ , , ” [10, 283-285],
, , [7; 10, 283]. ( – ),
, , ( , – ),
( , , , , , , ,
, , , , .), , ( - )
), (“ , ” ) [9, 298].
, , , .- . , ,
, , , , .)
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
271
[10, 285], ( “ , ”) ,
– .
, , “ ” ( ). ,
”, , ( , 2010 .
2011 .) – [10, 285]. , : 1) -
( , ) ( ) ( , .); 2)
, : , ; 3) ,
, ; 4) ( ),
( ), ( ) ; 5)
, .
( ) (“ ”, ), ,
, ( ) – ” ( ) – “ ” (
), ( ), ) ( .)
. , , ,
. ( ) – , – [10, 285-288]. “ ”
) , ) ( – ,
.) ( -).
, , , ,
[10, 286]. , “ ”, [11; 10, 286].
( ) , . , ( ) , , : –
, – , –
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
272
, – ) [9, 461]. , ,
( , , , ), , , [10, 295],
. – ,
. ( , –
) , ( ), -
. – ( 1924 ., , , ,
.). , ( ) – ( ) [10, 286].
“ ” ( ) .
, ( ) -
[10, 288-292]. ) ,
( ) ( ) [10, 292]. 1) -
2) “ ” 3) “ ” ( . )
4) 5) (
. 1995 ., , .)
. ,
, , , ( , , , , , .)
, , . . , , (“ ”
. “ ”, . ), ( 1934 .)
“ ” ( .VI 1937 .) , ,
( . VI 1954 .), “ ” (1) , 2) 3
3) ), ( “ ” 1921
. ), (
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
273
1954 .) “ ”, . . . VII 1954 .) “ ” –
(1) , , 2) , 3) , 4)
. 1954 .), (
) , , ( . , “ ” 1961 .) , “
”. , ” ( , , , , .) .
. . “ ” ( , , , , “ ” , .) . . , , . ., , .
. -
. – -
, . .
( , , , , , ). , . -
[9, 461-462; 10,284]. ( ) ( ) ( w )
. ( )
( ) [10, 288-292] (“ ”
” ) ( , , .) [10, 284]. ,
(“ , ” “ ”
– , , ).
– . “ ”, ( , , .)
( “ ” “ ” )
( , “ ”). - – [10, 284]. ,
1927 ., , , .
. , -
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
274
( 1915 ., 2003 ., 2003 . .)
[10, 293]. , – .
[11], “ ” “ ” ( ). “ ” :
”? ( ) ” ( 1970-
.) ., V . , , ,
( 2000- . ),
: , – , , – , , –
, , – , , –
, , – “ ” , [11].
( -) .
, , 1) ( ), 2) ( -“ ”-“ ”)
, ), , 3) ( ),
– , , 4) , ( , , ) 5) ( ,
, ) . , -: ,
( “ ” “ ”), -, (
) , , )
). “ ”
. , ( , ) , [10, 289-292],
, , - , , ,
, “ ” . , , , ,
[10, 295] ( - - , ), ,
, “ ”
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
275
, , , .) , . .,
[4, 170], , ( ) (
1960- . ,
, , , . , . “ ” ),
( , , , , , , .) . . – [9, 461], ,
[6] ( , , , , ,
, , .), – [10, 289-295]. “ ”
“ ”, , : , ,
– , , , .
( , 314 1987 .) “ ”, ,
, , . , , , ,
, . . ( , ) “ ”,
, . . ( ,
, ), [9, 458-459]. ,
, – , , .
, . ,
, ( ). ,
. ,
[9, 461]: . . – ., 1980- . , 1979 .) – . 1999 . –
( 1973 ., 1973 ., 1996 ., 2002 . .).
. – . , ( ) ,
[9, 461] . , (
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
276
) [9, 461-462]. ,
.
, – , ,
, . , .– .
. [9, 462]. – , ,
, -
1989-1992 . , [9,
461].
.
( ) ( , ). ( , ,
, , , , , , , , .). ,
, , , .) – ,
- [10, 295]. ,
(“ ”, ), , : . 1990- . –
( “ ” 1990 ., “ ” – “ ”
1991 ., , . 1993 . .), “ ”, 1996
., “ ” (“ ” 1996 ., “ : ”
, . . 1996 ., 1996 – 2000 . “ ”
“ ” ” 1997 . ).
“
” 1999 . [9, 461] : ,
:
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
277
, , .), (« » , ,
, , . , .), - (« » ,
, , , “ ” “ ” , , ,
.), ( , , .), (« » , , , , .)
( , , .) ( . ):
( , , , , .), –
“ ” ( ) . , ,
. ( “ ”, “ ”,
, ) 1) , 2) 3) -
( ) ( ) ,
, , , ( ) . .
, , ,
.
1. . / . // . – 2000. - 9. .29-45.
2. . : , , / . - .: . 1991. 200 .
3. . – : / – .: , 1991. 413 .
4. / , , , , , – .: . 1983. 296 .
5. . / . – .: , 1996. 413 .
6. . / . // . – 2000. - 7. - .3-4
7. . / , , . – .:
– . 2003. 592 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
278
8. . ( ) / . // .- 2004. - 3. -
.37-43. 9. .
/ . // . – 2008. – .10, 1 (36).- .1. – .455-464.
10. ., . / .,
. // . – 20011. – .13, 2 (48).- .3. – .283-296.
11. Blum H. A map of Misreading. N.Y., 1975. 213 p.
Summary Khaletsky O.V., Khalecka O.O.
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PARADIG IN ELITISTIC DISCURSION Social and cultural paradigm has his root in modern commonly-
conceptualstatement, so-called new directions of science, legitimated in birthrated philosophy of universal evolutionism. History isn’t the contribution, but a process of it’s creation because of: 1) eventually-partually branching (the idea of sinergetics), 2) social and intellectual cultural project (the idea of so-called “new history”), as 3) plurality of discussions – new meanings (“demon texture” by R.Barton, or “labyrinth” by U.Ecko). Peculiar genome of socisl life are culture decree, are the type of civilizational development is determined with the help of genetic codes, which are the systems of valuation. Social and cultural development in social thought are means treably: Firstly, as historical and spiritual totality (school of “Annales” and all others “annaloides”), Secondly, as fulfilment of social and cultural projects (postmodernism and poststructuralism) and, Thirdly, as determined role of consciousness and spiritual determinantes from the middle of the XX century are gaining an important meaning, and social and cultural development is presented.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
279
378.046.4 ., ., , ©
.,
.
.
: , , .
,
; , . ,
, . , ,
. ,
, .
) , , ,
, , , . -
, ,
:“ “, “ “., “ “, .
( ” ”, , , )
, , , .
,
.
© ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
280
.
, : - ; - ,
, , , -;
- ;
- , , ,
, ; - ,
.
, ,
, , , , .
, , .
- ( , , , ), , (
, ). , ,
. ,
, , .
, , ,
, , ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
281
1. ., . . – .:
, 1990. – 248 . 2. . .
. – .: , 2002.-512 . 3. . ,
, ( ) . : . . – : , 2001. - 2(2)- .129-134.
4. ., . . / / - : ,
2009. -115 . 5. . . – .: ,
1998.- 256 . 6. . . – .: ,
2000.- 576 . 7. . . – .: ,
2002.- 501 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
282
378.14 ., ., ., ., ., .,
., ., ., ., ., . ©
. : , , , , , .
, , , ,
. . ,
. , , , ,
. , . .
.
, – .
. ,
, , , . :
- , , , ,
; - ; - (
, , ;
- , , , .
, . ,
, © ., ., ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
283
; , . , ; , .
, : - ( )
… - - , ,
, ( ) ,
. , .
, .
(I , ) ( , …).
( ) – .
( ) , . :
, ; ; . : , ; ;
. .
, . ,
. , , ,
. .
, . ,
, . .
. , –
. , – . , ,
… : « », , , ,
, , , – .
: , . .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
284
, , . : , , , .
: ( ),
, , , . » , , ,
. « ,
, .
– « »,
. .
. « »
. « » ,
. « » 20
. 30%, –
20%, – 54 %. , , ,
, , , , , , , , .
, , , , , , , , , , .
, , , , , , , , , .
, , , , , , , , .
, .
. . ,
, , – ,
. .
, .
, : - ; - ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
285
- ( ) ( );
- : – , – , –
; - ( 9×9
) ; - , ; - , ; - , ,
; - ; - ,
.
1. . . – , 1997. 2. . , ., . .
– . – ,1996. 3. . : – . – -
, 1996. 4. ., . – -
,1995. 5. ., ., .
. – .: , 1987. 6. ., .
. – : ,1995. 7. . . – .: , 1966. – 224 . 8. . . . – .: . , 1985.
9. . // . – .,1997. – .729-730.
10. . ., . . // .
.. . – ., 1999. – .3 (II) . – .122-125. 11. ., . .- 2-
. – .: ,2006.- 347.
Summary It has been handled the problem of increase importance of perception and
awareness of educational information by creating an optimal environment.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
286
801.82:811.111(73).42 ., c., ., . ©
. .
as + adj +as like + noun. .
. : , , ,
, .
. , ,
, [1, 38]. – ,
, [2, 59].
( ) .
, [3, 282].
, . [4], . [5], . [6], . [7], . [8], . Anderson [9], D. Peaty [10].
([11], [12]) ([13]) .
.
[14], [15]. , . ,
, , ( ) [16, 165].
, , . ,
, , [17, 95], .
( ) ,
(red tape – ) [3, 282]. © ., ., 2012
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
287
, .
, . , : 1) phrasal verbs without objects (to wake up –
); 2) separable phrasal verbs (to put (something) on - ); 3) inseparable phrasal verbs (to call on (someone) – ); 4) phrasal verbs with extra prepositions (to get along with (someone) –
); 5) verb-noun combinations (to catch a cold – ); 6) verb-noun-preposition combinations (find fault with (someone/something) – ); 7) preposition-noun combinations (in time – ); 8) preposition-noun and preposition-adjective-noun combinations (of course – , in the long run –
); 9) preposition-noun-preposition combinations (in spite of – ); 10) preposition-adverb and preposition-adjective combinations (at once – ); 11) adjective-noun combinations (golden opportunity –
); 12) noun phrases (sandwich course – , ); 13) idioms from metaphors (white elephant –
); 14) verbal idioms from metaphors (put (one’s) foot down – ); 15) short idioms (pig-headed – ); 16) pair idioms (day after day –
); 17) adjectival idioms (tired of – ); 18) verb-preposition combinations (accuse someone of something – ); 19) miscellaneous verbal expressions (to come true – ); 20) everyday expressions (on the other hand – ) [10].
, as +adj +as like + noun.
1. as + adj +as. , : s wet as a fish, s plump as a
partridge, s strong as a horse, as gay as a lark, as savage as a tiger, as blind as a bat, as poor as a rat, as weak as a cat, as soft as a mole, as rough as a bear, as cold as a frog, as sick as a dog, as mild as a dove, as sharp as an owl, as sly as a fox, as live as a bird, as proud as a peacock, as gentle as a lamb, as blue as a sky, as busy as a bee, as busy as a child at play, as slippery as an eel, as sound as a bell, as active as quicksilver, as cool as a cucumber, as meek as a lamb, as right as rain, as black as a crow, as big as an elephant.
“ + , , , ”: , , ,
. .
. [3, 283]. .
[17, 96]. 2. v+like + noun ( “
”): like water off a duck’s back, like a bull in a china shop, like cat and dog, like a bear with a sore head, like a pig (to eat like a pig), , , ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
288
. (unchangeable idioms, cast-iron idioms, phraseological fusions) [3, 290].
[17, 96]. . - word-group idioms [16, 165].
: like a shot – in half a trice, in the twinkling of an eye – like winkling, like lightning – like a streak of lightning – with lightning speed ( , ) [3, 306].
: like draws to like, like will to like (
) [3, 308]. ),
), ), , , , ,
[17, 96].
: 1) , -
. , , , , , : a bone of contention – ;
2) , : as short as a dog’s tail – , ; as pale as a
paper – ; to know smth as one knows his ten fingers – , ; as clear as day light – , ; to lead a cat and
dog life – . : 1)
; 2) : to follow like St. Anthony’s pig – ;
3) .
. ): like mistress, like maid – ;
4) ( , , ).
, [16, 166-167]. , ,
, , . , , , , ,
, , . ,
, , , , .
, : to treat one like a lord – ( ) , fight like Kilkenny cats – . ,
: to drop like a hot
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
289
potato – , , .
, [15]. ,
: 1) , ( (1 , .):
to be the apple of someone’s eye – , ; (3 k.): to keep someone at one’s arm’s length –
; (8 .): they were fighting with their backs to the wall – ; (1 .): to have no backbone – ; (5 .):
to feel something in one’s bones – ; (2 .) to rack one’s brains over something – ; (1 .): to make a clean breast of something – ; (1 .): keep your chin up! –
!; (7 .): to be wet behind the ears – ; (1 .): to be up to the elbows in work – ; (13 .):
his eyes were bigger than his stomach – – ; (10 .): to save face – ; (6 .): to have two left feet –
; (9 .): to keep one’s fingers crossed – ; (4 .): to be all thumbs –
; (2 .): to be on one’s toes – ; (6 .): has the cat got your tongue? - , ?; (6 .): not to turn a hair – ; (28 .): to be in good hands –
; (22 .): use your head to save your feet – ; (26 .): from the bottom of one’s heart
– ; (2 .): to drag one’s heels – ; (4 .): to be down in the mouth – ; (6 .): to be breathing down one’s neck – ; (11 .): to pay through the nose –
; (4 .): to give someone the cold shoulder – ; (5 .): to be soaked to the skin – ;
(2 .): to have a cast-iron stomach – ; (3 .): to be armed to the teeth – ; (1 .): to have a sweet tooth –
; (2 .): to thrust something down someone’s throat – ; (1 .): at the top of one’s lungs – );
2) , ( (1 .): have ants in one’s pants – ,
; (6 .): a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush – , ; (2 .): to take the bull by the horns – ; (2 .): to let the cat our of the bag – ; (2
.): to count one’s chickens before they hatch – ; (1
.): as the crow flies – ; (4 .): barking dog seldom bites – , , ; (2 .): to take to something like a duck to water
– ; (4 .): like a fish out of water – ; (2 .): to harm not a fly – ; (1 .): to get
someone’s goat – ; (3 .): to cook one’s goose – ; (5 .): hold your horses! – ! (1 .): to do
something as a lark – ; (1 .): a leopard can’t change
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
290
its spots – ; (1 .): to receive the lion’s share – ; (2 .): as quiet as a mouse – ,
; (2 .): to buy a pig in a poke – ; (1 .): one swallow does not make a summer – ; (3 .): to cry wolf – ); 3) ,
( ( 1 .): to spill the beans – ; (2 .): to know which side one’s bread is buttered on –
, ; t (2 .): hat takes the cake! – ! (1 .): to put all one’ eggs in one basket – ; (1 .) to be
in a jam – ; (1 .): a hard nut to crack – ; (2 .): to burn the midnight oil – ;
(1 .): to be as like as two peas in a pod – ; (1 .): to eat humble pie – ; (1 .):
a hot potato – ; (3 .): the salt of the earth – ; (1 .): to be sandwiched in between – ; (1 .): to be packed in like sardines – ); 4) ,
( (1 .): to be tied to one’s mother’s apron – ; (10 .): to be old hat – ); (1 .): to wear the pants in the family – ; (1 .) to lose one’s shirt – ;
(7 .): not to want to be in one’s shoes – ; 5) ,
( (1 .): to get the axe – , ; (1 .): to have someone over a barrel –
; (2 .): to get up on the wrong side of the bed – ; (1 .): to be a wet blanket – ,
; (1 .): to call someone on the carpet – ; (1 .): it’s like looking for a needle in a haystack –
; (1 .): to throw in the towel – , ); 6) ,
( (2 .): to paint a thing black – ; (3 .): till you are blue in the face –
); 7) , ( (3 .): to be in the same boat –
; (1 .) to paddle one’s own canoe – ); 8) , ( (2
.): don’t cross your bridges before you come to them – ; (1 .): to sit on the fence – ;
(2 .): to put someone through the mill – ; (2 .): to live in an ivory tower – ;
(4 .): to be up against a brick wall – ); 9) , ( (2 .): the
dawn of a new age – ; (18 .): he has known better days – ; (2 .) in the dead of night – ); 10) ,
( (1 .): to run in the family – ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
291
(1 .): like father, like son – , ; (1 .) necessity is the mother of invention – )); 11) ,
( (1 .): to play first/second fiddle – ; (1 .): to blow one’s own trumpet – , ).
, .
. , ( , 203 46 342
). , (46 18, ).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
203 46 18 20 8 5 4 11 22 3 2
32 18 14 5 7 2 2 4 3 3 2
,
: (looking for a needle in a haystack – , the salt of the earth – ),
, (to be tied to one’s mother’s apron – , feel something in one’s bones – ), (to cook one’s goose – , a leopard can’t change its spots –
), (to burn the midnight oil – , to cry wolf – ).
. 342 , ,
, , . .
.
1. ., ., . / . , . , . – .: ., 2003. – 462
. 2. .
// / . . – , 1989. – . 59–65.
3. . English Lexiocology // . . – ., .., 1971. – 336 .
4. . / . . – : . , 1983. – 112 .
5. . / . . – .: ., 1966. – 86 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
292
6. . / . . – .: ., 1985. – 276 .
7. Weinreich, U.Problems in the Analysis of Idioms: Substance and Structure of Language / U. Weinreich. – Loss Angeles, University of California Press, 1984 – 234 p.
8. . / . . – , 1992. – 286 .
9. Anderson C. Easy Approach to English Idioms and Idiomatic Expressions: In 2 vols / C. Anderson. – Hong Kong: Book Marketing, Inc., 1974.
10. Peaty David. Working With English Idioms / David Peaty. – Harlow: Longman, 1996. – 110 p.
11. Longman Idioms. Dictionary. – Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2000. 12. . – .: , 1997. 13. : 2- .. – .: . , 1993. 14. . – .: . , 1969. 15. ., ., . ,
/ A. . , . . – .: “ ”, 2005. – 173 .
16. Korunets’ Ilko. Contrastive Typology of the English and Ukrainian Languages / Ilko Korunets’. – , Nova Knyha, 2003. – 459 p.
17. . / . . – .: . , 1962. – 496 .
Summary
TO THE PROBLEM OF ENGLISH PHRASEOLOGY INVESTIGATION The given investigation is devoted to the problem of phraseologisms in English and Ukrainian languages. Structural classifications of these linguistic units are stated. Stable idiomatic similies of the types as + adj +as and like + noun are investigated in more details Semantic groups of English idioms are proposed. The ways of phraseologiacal units translation are mentioned.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
293
. .
, .
In the article strategic principles of development of production of milk are reflected in sucklings person who tend cattle economies and products of his processing in the conditions of market economy, certainly basic directions of increase of competitiveness of these enterprises of APK in modern terms.
: , , , ,
. Keywords: to the competitiveness of production of milk, intensification,
sucklings person who tend cattle enterprises, government control, investment process.
. , , ,
, ,
. , ,
, ,
, .
,
, ,
.
.
, .
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
294
.
. .
, ,
, .
,
: ; ;
, ,
; ; ;
. [1, . 171].
. , .
, -
, , ,
.
. ,
, [6, . 17].
.
, - . ,
, : ,
;
; ;
, ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
295
, ;
; ; ; .
,
.
( 1-2 ) .
.
[1, . 57]. , ,
, , ,
. , ,
, , , , ,
60%, 83%.
80%, . .
, ( 2007 1,6 – 1,7 .), ,
. , , .
.
0,8, 1% 0,8%.
[4, . 2].
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
296
-
, , , , ,
, . :
-
, ,
; ,
, , ,
;
;
;
;
;
, , ,
( );
.
. , , –
( ) , , .
: , ,
, [2, . 268].
, 20–40%
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
297
. .
5-10%, .
. , .
[2, . 458].
,
, : – « »
, , , );
( - ),
;
( ) [6, . 48].
, , .
.
10-15%, .
, . , ,
, , , ,
[3, . 130].
, . ,
, [5].
. : , , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
298
. ,
. .
1. . . : , , : [ .] / . . , A.M. . – : 2008. – 198 .
2. . . / . . //
. – .: , 2002. – 730 .
3. . .
/ . . // . – 2008. – 10. – . 129–133. 4. . – / . //
. – 2009. – 41. – . 2-3. 5. . .
/ . . // . – 2010. – 1. – . 13-17.
6. . . : [ ] / . . . – .: ,
2001. – 328 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
299
332.2.021 .
. ,
, .
, . ,
, , ,
, .
, , ,
,
. , , ,
. ,
. . ,
, ,
: . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .
,
,
.
,
, ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
300
, .
. , –
, –
, –
. .
, . , ,
, , . ,
90- XX , .
, . ,
. 22,2 . , 3,2 .
. 7 . , , 6,8 .
. 11 . :
, , , .
11,3 . 16.1 . [1].
, 1991 , .
, . ,
,
. ,
, - .
– ,
, , ,
. " " , , , , ,
, .
, , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
301
, - .
,
. ,
(1992 .). (2002 .)
, .
. .
,
. ,
.
, ,
.
.
. : 50,9%, 49,1%. :
, , , . : , , .
– , – .
1666,7 . (59,3 % ), – 1358,9 . , – 135,7 . , – 117,3 . ,
– 42,1 . 2213 . 436 ; 157
; 47 ; 1474 ; 44 ; 55
( . 1) [2].
2010- ., , .
2010 . 6,4 %. (2- ). 2010 . 6 . 632
. . 2011 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
302
1260,4 . ., 0,5 % 2010 . ( . 2) [3].
436; 20%
47; 2%44; 2%
157; 7%
1474; 67%
55; 2%
. 1. 2011 .*
2010 . 3 .
388 ., 51% . 3).
, , , ,
2009 . , 2010 .,
. 2482,5 . , - 38,5 . 01.06.2010 .
811,8 . . (+ 69,6 ) - 412,3 . (+16,2 )
. .: - 43 ., - 143,6 . , - 172,9 . [4]. 40,8 . , - 97,8 . ,
60,8 . , 9,6 . , - 93,2 . , - 21,7 . . 30,5 . (+13,1
), 24,9 . (+13,3 ), - 34,2 . (+12,3 . ).
1094 . . (+98 ) ( . 4).
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
303
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
. .
. 2.
*
2396
2830 28403078
3499 3388
1049
1518 1481 1555 15101781 1752
3062
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
. .
. 3. *
, 17 %
. ,
, [5]. 2010 .
215,1 . (
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
304
), 13,7 . , 36,6 . , 164,7 . . 2010 . 3,1 % , .
3,2 % 2,6 . . 85,2 . .
3,4 . 24,9 % (17,2 . ).
533,8670,7 668,1 638,1 623,3 648,2 644,3
1369,8
2314 2283,8
1856,5 1795,9
2592,92483
25,7 34,5 34,2 29,1 28,8 40 38,50
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
. .
, , ,
. 4. *
. 2010 . 519 ,
4980 ( 1 , ), .
, , , 2010 .
50 , 2132 .
. ,
, ,
. , .
: – , ; – ; – ; – ;
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
305
– ; – ,
, , .
1. : , . ( 6) / .
. — .: , 2011. — 764 . — .331. 2. [ ] :
web– . — : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. 3.
( ): / . . , . . ; .: . . — .: ,
2011. — 168 . 4. : . . / .: .
; . . — ., 2011. — 342 . 5. : / .
. — .: , 2011. — 214 . — .157; 2011 / :
. . — .: « », 2011. — 247 . — .48–55.
.
, , ,
,
. , , ,
. ,
, . : , , ,
, .
.
, ,
,
, . ,
, , .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
306
, .
: , , , , .
Chuzhmyr M.A.
Zemlezabezpechenyst Efficiency and functioning of the agricultural enterprises in Kiev region
It is set in the article, that in agriculture, as a result of feature of production, development of bagatoukladnosti, through organization of new and restructuring of existent economies on a peculiar on earth and other capital goods, there were specific terms of integration of earth in the system of public relations. It touches and that directly the producers of agricultural produce, which are the proprietors of earth, create rent and can appropriate it. It is well-proven that the structure of land-tenure determining appearance influences on specialization of agricultural production, his efficiency and dokhidnist.
Key words: earth, zemlezabezpechenist', agriculture, agricultural enterprises, producers.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
307
: 364.48: 338.435
.
.
. ,
« », .
.
, . : . , , . , . ,
. , . , , . , . , . , , . . ,
.
.
: « », »;
; ; .
. « » ,
. , ,
. . , ,
[1], , [2].
, , , ,
. , « » -
. ,
, .
. , ,
, - [3, .35].
, ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
308
( , ).
: –
, – .
. ,
,
.
, , « » « ». », « », ,
« », « » « ».
[4]. . , . , . ,
. , . . ,
. ,
.
, , , .
. : [5, . 64]. ,
, ,
.
« ».
, ( ),
– .
, , ,
. , , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
309
. ,
, .
, , ,
. ,
– . -
– , , , , , , , ,
. , , –
( ), .
. , – ,
[6]. , . ,
, (
), .
, ,
, [ 7, c.9 ].
. . ,
, , ,
. , , , , ,
, , [8, .312]. – ,
.
[9]. , ( , ), ,
. – .
, – ,
. ,
, , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
310
. , , ,
,
. ,
, .
. , ,
, ( , , , , , , ,
).
, .
, ,
( ), .
. , [10].
90- . . .
, : ,
, , ,
: , , , , .
.
.
, . , , :
( , , , ); ( , , ); ( ,
, ); ( , , , ) [11].
. ( , , ,
) , ,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
311
, ) [12]. , ,
, . , , .
.
,
, , , , , , ;
, , , ,
. , ,
. ,
[13].
. , :
- ( , -, -, -, , , .);
- ( , , ); -
, , ); - ( , , , ,
); :
- ( , , );
- ( , , );
- ( , , , , -
); - , , ( ,
, , , .) 14 . ,
, . . ,
, ,
. ,
.
,
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
312
.
.
, , , ,
.
1. . : . / . . - . . . – ,
1984. – 250 . 2. . – .:
, 1987. –240 . 3. . : /
. . – .: , 1980. – 206 . 4. . . /
. , . . – .: , 1981. – 217 . 5. . /
. , . // . – 2002. – 2.– . 63-68. 6. .
( ). - . ... . . : 08.09.01. – , 2003. - 39 .
7. . : / . . – .: , 1996. – 172 .
8. . / . . - . . . – .: IAE , 1999.–
362 . 9. (
). – .: – « ». – 2006. – 260 .
10. . / . //
. – 47. – 1995. – . 92-96. 11. .
: / . . – : , 2002. – 264 .
12. . / . , . , . . – .: ,
2001. – 119 . 13. . / . ,
// .- . . « ». – 4. – 2006. – .102-111.
14. . / . . – ., 2003. – 60 .
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
313
. , « »,
, .
: , , , , .
. ,
», ,
. : , ,
, , .
Summary This article explores the social and economic infrastructure of rural nature.
In particular, proved the concept of «social infrastructure», defines the peculiarities of the social infrastructure of rural areas as an economic category, determine the composition of objects and the classification of social infrastructure.
Key-words: infrastructure, social infrastructure, rural areas, classification, objects.
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
314
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION AND
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ALTERATION
1. ., ., .
………………………………………………………... 3 2. .
-
………………………………………………………... 11 3. .
- …………………………………………………. 15
4. ., .
…………………………………………………….. 19 5. .
……………. 26
6. . ., . . —
. ……….. 30 7. ., .
……………………………………………………... 33
8. .
……………… 38 9. ., .
…………………………………………………… 43 10. ., .
……………… 47
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
315
11. .
………………………….. 53 12. .
…………………………………………. 57
13. ., . ………………. 64
14. ., .
…………….. 68 15. .
( )
……………………………………... 80 16. ., .
……………………………………………… 87 17. ., .
………………………………………………………………… 93
18. .
……. 100 19. .
…………………………….. 117
20. .
……. 122 21. .
. 126
22. ., .
…….. 133 23. .
………….
138 24. .
……………………………………….
144
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
316
25. .
……………... 151
HUMANITARIAN EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOL
26. ., .
– …………………………………………………. 158
27. .
…………….. 164 28. ., ., ., .
…………………………………………………. 169
29. ., . :
………………………………………………………. 174 30. .
……………………………………. 179
31. . (1917-1991 .) ………… 184
32. . .
……………... 189 33. ., .
……………………………………………………. 194 34. . ., . .
: ………………………………………….….. 200
35. . ., . . “ ” ………………… 204
36. .
……………………………………………………………….. 208
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
317
37. ., ., ., .
……………………………………... 214
38. .
…………………………………..
218 39. . ., . .
1929-39 ……... 224 40. .
20- . ………………………………………………………………….. 228
41. .
………………………………………………. 235 42. .
………………… 239 43. ., .
………… 244 44. .
1917-1921 …………………………………………………………… 251
45. . ………………………………………………. 256
46. . : .. 260
47. .
………………………. 263 48. ., .
…………………………………………………………….. 267
49. ., .
. ………………….. 279 50. ., ., ., .
…………………….. 282
51. ., .
………………………………………………...
286
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
318
52. . .
293 53. .
………………………… 299 54. .
……………………………………………. 307
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012
319
. 1998
Scientific Messenger
of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj
“ ”
14, 2 (52) 4
Series “Economical sciences”
20.06.2012. 70 1/16 . Times New Roman. 1. . . . 26,49.
100 . . 20/06.
. ., ., , . 18
. : [email protected], . (032) 243-68-49 1948318017, 02 635667
13.09.2007
![Пилипчук Я.В. Зовнішні кордони Половецького степу [External borders of Pole Polovetske] // Вісник Аграрної історії. Вип.](https://static.fdokumen.com/doc/165x107/63142bd15cba183dbf0770ef/pilipchuk-yav-zovnshn-kordoni-polovetskogo.jpg)
