НАУКОВИЙ ВІСНИК - Scientific Messenger of LNU of ...

319
. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012 . 1998 Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj 14, 2 (52) 4 Series “Economical sciences” – 2012

Transcript of НАУКОВИЙ ВІСНИК - Scientific Messenger of LNU of ...

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

1

. 1998

Scientific Messenger

of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies

named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj

“ ”

14, 2 (52) 4

Series “Economical sciences”

– 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

2

. – , , ., . , , ;

– . , .- ., ., . , , , . . ; . – , . . ., . . .

. – ., , ;

– ., . . ; – ., . . ;

. – ., ., . ; – .- ., . . ;

– ., , ; - ., . . , . .

; – ., , . ;

– ., . , ; – ., . . ;

– . . ., ., . . ; – ., . . ;

. – ., ., - ; – ., , . ; – ., ., ;

– . ., . . ; – . . ., . . ;

– ., ., , ;

– . . ., . . ; – ., ., . , . . , ; – ., . ;

– .- ., ., . . ; . – .- .. ., ., . . ;

. – ., ., . . ; - ., ., . ;

. – . . ., . . ; - ., , . . ;

– ., , . . . ; – ., ., . . , . .

; – ., ., . . ;

. – .- ., ., . . ;

. – . ., . - ( ); . – .- ., ., . . , ; . – . . ., ., . . ;

. - . ., ., . . . – . ., ., . . ,

; . – ., . “ ”, . . ;

– ., . , . . ; . – ., . . ;

– . . ., . . ; . – ., . . ; . – ., ., . . ;

– - ., ., . . ; – ., ., . . ;

. - . .- ., ., . . ; . – .- ., , . . ;

– ., ., . . ; – . .- ., . , ., - ;

- . ., . .

, ( ) .

, .

( 2 26.04.2012 ). 14133-3104

11.06.2008

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

3

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION AND

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ALTERATION

631.115.1 ., ., 1, ., ., 2,

., 1 ©

1) 2)

. .

.

, . ,

. . ,

. , .

, . , ,

. ,

, , .

, ,

, .

,

© ., ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

4

.

, , ,

.

. . , ,

, ,

.

, , , , , , , , ,

, .

, , . ,

( )

. , , ( )

, , ,

, 70% 90%

( ) [8, .58].

, ,

, ,

, ( ) . ,

, .

.

. .

, , : . 2010 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

5

(3,0%) , ( -, ).

, 2010 . : 103

(52,3%), 86 , (43,7%),

. , 956

, 319,4 . 241,8 . .

. 2000-2010 .

. , ( 2005 .),

, , 2003 .

. , ,

. (

2005 .) 2003 . 92,2%,

90,6% 93,6% , 2010 . – 73,7%, 77,9% 69,5%.

, , , .

2010 . 77,1% , : –72,5%, –87,6%, -95,2% 56,8 %, 50,7% , 68,3% 93,0%

2000 . ,

, . ,

2010 . 96,1% 98,9%

2000 ., – 95,3% 95,5%, –99,1% 98,7%. 2010 . ( ) (

) 92,6% 87,8% 2000 ., - 62,7% 97,2%, , , – 100%, –76,4% 88,1%, –83,3%

98,1%, – 97,9% 89,6%, – 96,5% 93,6%. ,

, ( ) ,

. , , 2010 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

6

48,0% 46,0% 2000 ., ( )

6,2% 52,4%, ( ) -53,1% 91,8%, – 18,4% 95,0% 2000 .

, ,

, . ,

2010 . 2000 . 2,0 , – 2,0 , – 21,8%, –

31,2%, – 9,2%, 9,2%, – 2,4 .

2010 . 90,4%

81,7% 2000 ., 94,4% 89,3%, 63,0% 92,4%, - 91,2% 97,9%, – 98,0%

81,4%, – 97,9% 99,9%, 60,3% 93,2 % – 96,9% 76,4% 2000 . ( .1).

1 ,

,

), % *) 2000 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .

81,7 88,8 88,8 90,0 90,5 90,4 90,4

: 89,3 93,9 93,6 94,0 94,0 93,7 93,4

92,4 85,4 82,7 79,8 72,9 66,0 63,0 97,9 95,7 95,6 93,8 92,9 90,9 91,2

: 92,7 84,6 83,7 77,5 73,1 70,8 72,1 99,7 99,1 99,2 99,0 99,4 97,6 97,3

81,4 93,8 94,6 96,1 97,2 97,5 98,0 99,9 100,0 100,0 98,3 97,8 97,9 97,9 93,2 75,8 71,1 67,4 60,4 61,2 60,3

76,4 94,2 95,0 95,4 96,1 96,7 96,9 *) : [9, .47, 48].

, 2000-2010 . ,

, 100 ( .2).

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

7

2 ,

, 100 ( ), . *)

200 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .

126 92 97 83 78 75 67

: 82 63 59 53 49 47 45

63 55 60 53 49 52 48 2,1 1,2 1,2 1,1 1,0 1,1 1,1

5,0 4,0 5,1 3,5 3,5 3,6 3,7 *) : [9, .50].

, 100 2010 . 67

126 2000 ., – 45 82 , – 48 63 , –1,1

2,1 , – 3,7 5,0 2000 . ,

. 2010 . ,

33,0 % 18,5% 2000 ., , ,

59,6% 34,7%, – 61,6% 35,2%, – 68,4% 54,0%, – 99,2 % 97,0%, –97,3% 94,4% 2000 . ( . 3).

3 ,

( ), % *)

2000 . 2005 . 2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 . 18,5 26,2 27,2 29,4 31,4 32,3 33,0

,

34,7 45,6 48,4 52,0 57,5 57,1 59,6

35,2 47,2 50,2 54,1 55,0 59,3 61,6 54,0 64,0 63,8 65,7 67,7 66,7 68,4

97,0 99,5 99,5 99,7 99,6 99,2 99,2 94,4 96,9 99,8 97,2 97,0 97,3 97,3

*) : [9, .50].

, ,

( . 4).

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

8

, ,

. ,

. ,

[2, .60-61];

4

20

00.

2005

.

2006

.

2007

.

2008

.

2009

.

2010

.

3273 3628 3828 3895 3895 3909 3906

, 2,7 2,8 2,7 2,6 2,6 2,7 2,5

100 ,

.: 95 96 97 97 97 97 97 1778 1885 1922 1838 1840 2167 1894 79 67 67 68 67 67 67

– --

:

, 1913 2753 2605 2297 2655 3111 2930

, 0,8 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,8 1,8 1,1

100 , .

68 76 77 66 69 70 66 645 1038 1302 901 1329 2057 1873 48 61 100 92 64 42 43

*) : [9, .51].

, – , ,

.

, .

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

9

, .

.

, , .

, , ,

. .

. ,

. .

, ( ) ,

,

.

1. . : / , . – :

, 2010. –201 .

2. . : / // :

: “ ” / . . – : , 2001. - .34-62.

3. . / , //

: / . . – :

, 2006. - .143-153. 4. :

/ . –: , 1998. –36 . 5. .

: / . – , 2010. –149 . 6. . : ,

/ . , . . . – : , 2005. –232 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

10

7. . : / ; . . – .: ,

2011. –654 . 8. .

/ . // . –2004. 11. – -58-68.

9. / : - :

, 2011. –154 . 10. . : ,

: / . – , 2003. –280 .

Summary Berezivskyi P.S.1), Berezivskyi Ya. P.2), Berezivska O. Ya.1)

1) Lviv National Agrarian University, Ukraine 2) Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies

named after S.Z. Gzhytsk j, Ukraine PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRIVATE PEASANT’S FARM

The article describes transformation dynamics of development of the private peasant’s farm of post-reform period of Lviv region. Estimation of the structural-dynamic tendencies of development are given, grounded the ways of prospects development of the private peasant farms.

Key words: private peasant’s farm, transformation dynamics, post-reform period, prospects of development.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

11

631.1 ., ©

.

- . : ,

, , .

.

, , .

. . , ,

, -,

. .

. : .,

., ., ., ., ., ., .

.

, .

.

, . , -

, , ,

- , , , , . . .

© – ., .

., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

12

, ( . 1).

. 1.

.

, , [6].

, ,

, , . – , ,

, , ( )

. , " " " ".

:

;

;

.

, :

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

13

. 2.

– , , , ,

, .

, , , ,

( , , ).

:

1. , .

, ,

. . 2.

. .

3. .

-

-

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

14

4. .

, .

. . ,

, . .

, .

1. .

: . – .: . , 2011. – 364 . 2. . – .: , , 1998.-376 . 3. .

, .// . – 2007. - 1. – .86-87. 4. .

// . - 2004. - 1. - . 50-54. 5. . // . 2008 . - 12. - . 48-52. 6. . . . // . – 2004 .

Summary Bodak H.I.

ESSENCE ORGANIZATIONAL - ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF FUNCTIONING AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES

Article is devoted to solving theoretical and practical issues in dealing with crisis in agricultural enterprises and their revival by the rationale of organizational-economic mechanism.

Key words: agriculture, organizational and economic mechanism, farms, agricultural production.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

15

338.432:631.95 ., ., ©

-

, 1990

( ) 60,5 . , 2009 27,7 . , 0,7 0,5 . –

59,8 27,2 . . , 97 % . ,

.

: , , , .

.

, .

, , ,

, : – – – – .

, . .

, ,

.

. ,

. )

, . ,

. ( ,

), .

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

16

, . ,

700 . ( ) . , 240 . ,

, 68,7 51,4 . ( ) .

, .

, , ,

. , [1-5] ,

, .

. .

. , , , , ,

, , ,

, 6308,2 . . 1990

5620,6 . . 2009 , – 147,0 98,4 . . 6161,2

5522,2 . . . 1990 ( )

60,5 . , 2009 27,7 . , 0,7 0,5 .

– 59,8 27,2 . . ,

. , 2009 ( ) 42 ,

345,6 , - 196, - 190,3, - 152,3 . ,

, .

97 % ( )

. ,

.1

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

17

, ,

, , ,

, ,

( ). ,

,

, . ,

,

, . ,

. ,

, .

, , , .

. , ,

, .

1. . //

. – 1999. - 3. – .28. 2. : //

. – 2001. - 5. – .2-55. 3. : ,

. ( 6) / . . – .: , 2007. – 764 .

4. . : , . –

.: , 2010. – 56 . 5. . :

// . – .:

, 2007. – .139-148.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

18

Summary Vlasenko I. V.

Vinnitsa National Agrarian University RABBIT - PROVISIONS IN ENSURING FOOD SECURITY

We show that in Ukraine in 1990 in all categories of implementation rabbits for slaughter (live weight) was 60.5 thousand tons and in 2009 this figure decreased to 27.7 thousand tons, including farms respectively from 0.7 to 0.5 tons in households from 59.8 to 27.2 tons proved that today in Ukraine almost 97% of the number of rabbits is concentrated in individual farms. Of course, the rabbit can be seen as an important industry in solving problems of people with meat and meat products. Keywords: rabbits, rabbits livestock, meat and meat products farms.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

19

332:338.24 ., , ., ©

: , , , .

.

.

- , ,

, . , , .

. ;

. , . , . , JI. , . ,

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . [1].

. ,

, , ,

, „ ” .

,

. . , :

, , );

, , ; , ,

, ; , , ,

, , .

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

20

, - ,

. ( ,

) ( , ), .

, , : ,

, ; ; ( , ,

, ) ; , .

: , , .

,

. , , , ,

. , , , , « »,

, .

[2], , .

. , 90- XX . ,

, . , , .

. , 28

1996 ., ; ,

. 700 ,

. , , ,

. -.

,

, . ,

. , .

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

21

.

(

) . , , [2],

1000 , ,

. ,

, , .

. 1999

30 2000 . 2000

. , ( 832) -

, . ,

, ,

. , ,

, . :

, , ,

. ,

, .

, , , .

: ; ;

( , ),

, , . , -

, , . [3]

. ,

, , -

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

22

. - ,

.

, , -

. , .

, : ;

, ,

, , , ,

, ,

. , ,

. : 1) - -

, , ;

2) ; 3) .

, , ,

, ,

.

, ,

.

. , ,

– .

, ,

, , [4, .3-4].

, . . , -

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

23

, , ,

. .

, .

,

, ( ) , , ,

; . ,

: ,

, . , , [5, . 57].

. . , ,

. , .

. , . -

, . - .

, . - ,

[6, . 32-33].

. -

; ; ,

, -, , .

. ,

, - - .

, , , ,

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

24

, , -

, ,

.

, . .

,

, , ,

. ,

: , , ;

;

, , ;

. , .

. .

, , , ,

,

, . :

, , ,

. ,

, . .

, : 1) ; 2)

, ; 3) ,

, . ,

, “ ” .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

25

1. . .

. - : , . . , 2005. - 550 . 2. ., ., .

. - ., 2001. -215 . 3. http://www.ci.com.ua/agrodep/31html. 4.

/ . .T. , . . . - .: , 2002. - 59 . 5. . . :

: .- : 3 . - . 2: . - .: , 2001. -484 .

6. . 1. //

: , . - . 25: / . . - , 2001. - . 30 - 33.

Summary On the basis of investigation on the mechanism for controlling the national

and regional development of AIC, its main point, functions, tasks and regional features are revealed. It is determined that the mechanism for controlling the AIC is elements complicated and unbalanced as to the directing the functioning of separate AIC elements. Since agricultural policy in Ukraine is conducted by different departments coordination between this is very weak. It is proved that the efficiency of control bodies activities depends on the results of the government activities as to AIC functioning on an all country scale, on the resultative activities of separate services and departments which influence the development of AIC and its separate sections and on the efficiency of control structures which are functioning in AIC on the regional, district and local levels.

Keywords: development control, regional features, control mechanism, control functions.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

26

504.064.4 ., , ., ©

.

. ,

, , , .

: , , , , .

.

, ,

. - ,

. . ,

, .

, , , .

. ,

., ., ., ., ., ., . .

. . 2010

431,6 , 419 , 12,4 .

, (99,6%), IV , 1,1 , 0,3%, - .

5,0 506,5 .

. , , 285,6 (68,1%

) 9061,2 (68,3% ), , , – 38,4 (9,2%)

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

27

2360 (17%), – 26,8 (6,4%) 809 (6,1%).

27,3 , 6,5%, 388,8 , 2,9%), , (2,9 , 0,7% 86 , 0,6%),

(10,4 , 2,5%, 5,1 , 0,04%) [1].

( 5 30%) 40% ( .1).

.1

2372 23502585

2303

1231

1569

950 1059 1031 1071

863 848992 919

307334

642826

32,239,662,171,4 16,515,80

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

2010 19%.

, . , ,

. .

. , ,

.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

28

, .

. ,

20 , . 6,5 ,

4 - , 16 - . , , , 20 , .

400 400 100 , 300

200 69,8 . [1].

, , .

, .

. .

, .

, , , .

: 1) ,

, ; 2)

; 3) , ,

; 4)

[2].

. , , ,

. , « » ( )

. ,

. . 5

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

29

, ,

.

.

1. ., ., . : . . — .: , 2007.

— 322 . 2. . //

. — 1999. — 11-12. — .118-120. Summary

Grabowski R. CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS OF USING WASTE AS

SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS IN UKRAINE Waste treatment for Ukraine is the urgent task of national importance,

because so is saving resources, greening the environment and improve management. The processing of waste in the state will create Legal and economic

mechanisms to stimulate enterprises to organize a system for sorting, storing, transporting and processing waste.

Key words: secondary raw materials, waste management, recycling, recycling, recycling exchange.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

30

681.5.017:62-785:338.439.64 . ., ., ©

. ., .

: — ,

.

. . , (

) ,

, ,

, ,

, . , , ,

, , ,

. , ,

, .

: , , , , , .

.

.

, , .

,

,

, . .

, © . ., . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

31

, . ,

, .

. , , ,

. “ ”, “ ” ,

, , ,

, , , , .

, , ”, “ ” ( ),

: 1) ; 2) ,

, ( ); 3) ( ) ,

; 4) ; 5) ; 6)

; 7) ( )

; 8) .

, ,

, : 1)

. ; 2) ,

“ ” ;

3) . ;

4) , , ,

; 5) ; 6)

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

32

”, “ ” ,

, . ,

, ,

, . ,

( ) .

. ,

. ,

, ,

, , .

1. . . :

) // . - 2010, . . .; - 168 . 2. . ., . ., . .

// , - 1997 - 3 — . 62-66.

3. . . — ISO // ., . ., -

, . 7, 3,4, - 2006 — . 314-316. Summary

Grymak A.V., Velychko O. V. HACCP – THE EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF CONTROL FOR THE SAFETY OF

FOOD-STUFFS HACCP is the organization system of self-control for the safety of production

which is producing by enterprises of product subcomplex based on different forms of property. In Ukraine HACCP system is spreading widely year by year. Ukraine's membership in WTO and preparation for joining the EU stimulate this process. The safety of nutrition, especially children's one, is a priority direction of state policy. The duty of enterprises that produce food-stuffs is to elaborate and inculcate technologic regulations concerning output producing on the basis of criterions which provide all indexes of production's quality and harmless.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

33

330.338 ., ., , ., , ©

,

, .

.

: , , , ,

, , , , , , , ,

, .

.

. ,

.

, .

, .

.

, . ,

, , , , .

, , , , , ,

.

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

34

, , .

.

: . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .

. .

. 1,2%, 2,62

. 18,6%, 12,4%.

, , 10- 14- . 2011

11,08 . , 1990 - 22,5 .

15 .

1998

. , - .

2010 -

. 2011 ( 970 ).

,

, . ,

( , , , ), ( ,

, ). – ,

, , ,

. :

; ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

35

; ; ; -

; .

. ,

, .

, ,

, .

,

, – . ,

. ,

, , ,

. – , .

.

. , . . ,

: ,

; ,

.

. ,

, ,

. , , , ,

.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

36

, ,

, , ,

, ,

. ,

, ,

.

. ,

. , .

, , – ,

, . ,

, : ,

, ;

;

;

;

; ,

, , ; ,

. .

,

.

: ;

; ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

37

, ;

;

; .

,

, .

1. . :

// .– 2005.– 5. – . 139–143. 2. .

// .– 2005.– 4. – . 76–81. 3. .

: . – ., 2004. – 84 . 4. . //

.–2008.– 9. – . 133–138. 5. .

// .– 2008.– 5. – . 136–141. 6. .

// .– 2009.– 7. – . 62–69. 7. .

: . – .: , 2001. – 328 . 8. .

: . – : , 2005. – 346 .

9. . ? // .– 2007.– 1. – . 36–38.

10. . , // & .– 2008.– 10. – . 41–48.

Summary Dadak O.O.

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named afterf S.Z. Gzhytskij

The article exposed the problem and the state dairy industry in Ukraine, and offered reasonable solutions to these important problems of the industry, as its transformation into krupnotovarnogo production and maintenance of high quality raw milk. The analysis of the dairy industry and opportunities for further development at the present stage of market economy as part of agriculture.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

38

636.5: 631.1 ., ©

.

: ,

. , , .

. .

. ,

, .

.

. ,

,

[7].

, ,

, - .

, , – .

,

. ,

, , – . ,

.

.

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

39

[5].

– , ,

. ,

, – , .

, ,

. . -

,

, : . , . , . , . , . . , . ,

. , . , . , . , ,

, . .

,

. .

, .

, .

,

, , .

, , .

, . ,

.

. .

HACCP (Hazard Analysis

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

40

and Critical Control Point), ISO 9001:2000 , , ,

.

, [6].

.

.

, [2].

, " " ,

,

. ,

, , [1].

, , ,

-.

, , : ( ) ; ; ( ) ;

( ) : ; ; ; .

, .

: ; ; ; ; ; , .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

41

: . ,

. ,

.

, :

, , .

,

, . ,

. . ,

. ,

(

, ), , : , ,

, .

« » , .

. , , , , ,

. ,

. – .

. ,

, .

,

. .

,

, , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

42

, .

, , ,

, ,

.

1. . - .: , 2006. - 514 .

2. ., . / . . . :

. . 65. - : , 2007 - . 3-14. 3. , ,

/ . , . , . ..; . . , . . - .: " ", 2006. - 693 .

4. . - .: , 2003. - 335 .

5. ., . . - . 2004. - 1. - . 89-93.

6. http://www.ptizevod.narod.ru 7. http://www.biznes-pro.ua

Summary

With the entry of Ukraine into the World Trade Organization have a qualitatively new socio-economic conditions of agricultural production: economic change, information and legal environment functioning agricultural enterprises. Now they have another purpose and tasks of different nature, which increasingly takes the form of business. There are diverse in type and organizational-legal forms of enterprise. Changed the nature of their connections and relationships between themselves and other market players. For domestic enterprises increased opportunities to enter international markets. However, our country's membership in WTO makes the Ukrainian market open to foreign producers, resulting in the intensity of competition in the domestic market has increased.

Well-being and business success of enterprises depend on the efficiency of their business.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

43

004:338.48 ., , ., .- . . ©

, .

: , , , , .

:

, , , ,

. , ,

, .

,

. , ,

.

. .

, . ,

, . , . ,

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , .

. „ ” , , ,

, . ,

.

, .

. , ,

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

44

, , - .

.

,

, ( ,

). , , ,

, .

, . ,

, , ,

, , .

(Global Distribution System),

, , , , .

AMADEUS, Sabre, Galileo, Wordspam [1, C.132].

, .

, , ,

, .

», « », « » .

,

.

, , ,

, . ,

: ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

45

, .

: , , , ;

, , ,

; , ; ;

, . . 2/3

,

. . ,

.

, ,

, , , ,

, , , , ).

«monitoring.com.ua», – , , ,

. (60%), 20 44 (55%), (65%)

80-100 (38%). « »,

.

(http://www.allrural.com). , , 7%

.

– ,

.

( ), ( ,

, ), ( ).

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

46

. ,

, .

" " - http://www.greentour.com.ua,

, , ;

; , .

. , ,

,

( , , ) .

-

. ,

.

1. . /

. // . – 2010. - 2(6). – . 129-138.

2. . . // . . . . : .- 2006. – 13.-

.528-531. 3. .

/ . , . , . // . – 2001. – 1. – .99-104.

4. . . / . . // . – 2010. – 8. – . 100-105.

Summary Abstract: In the article the principles of information provision of agro formed

requirements for information systems in agro-tourism. Key words: nformation System, rural tourism, information base, development,

resources. – ., . . . .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

47

364.22 ., . ., ., . . ©

« »

, ,

.

. : , , ,

, , .

.

, , ,

[1]. , « , , » [2].

. .

, , .

, ., ., ., ., ., ., . .

, , , ,

,

, , . .

1) , ; 2) ,

; 3)

. .

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

48

, , ,

, , [1].

.1.

[1].

,

, . , , [3].

1. ( , , , , , ,

); 2. ( , , ,

);

;

; ;

;

;

; ;

;

;

;

;

;

;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

49

3. ( , );

4. ( , ,

). . , ,

, , . ,

– , , « », . ,

, – ,

; 5. ( ,

, );

6. ( ); 7. ( , ,

[4]. 8. ( , , ).

, . , ,

, , , ,

, .

, . :

.

, .

. ,

. ,

, , .

, ( ) .

. ,

( )

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

50

. 1984

. , " , ( , ) ,

".

.2.

[1].

1. ;

2.

; 3.

,

1. , ;

2. ;

3. ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

51

. 3.

[1]

,

. , , ,

[1]. .

.

.

, .

1. : .

, , ..]; .. . – : , « » 2010. – 432 .

2. . , : [ ]/ // . – 2009. – 14

( 38).

1. ;

2. ;

3. ;

4.

1. ;

2.

; 3.

..

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

52

3. . . ,

, , . – .,2004.

4. . / , . . – .: , 2007.

Summ ry The article analyses the basic elements of the system of financial support to

overcome poverty are factors of poverty, which affects the choice of financial instruments. Investigated features of application of financial support measures for overcoming the absolute and relative poverty.

Key words: financial security, poverty, income, financial resources, factors, minimizing.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

53

637.13 ., ©

,

. : , ,

, .

. ,

.

, , .

.

, , ,

. , .

2011 1 , .

, , ( )

. 2011 4268-VI “

“, [1, . 24].

. ,

, . .,

., ., ., .,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

54

., ., : ., ., .

,

. . 2011

. , 2010 2736,5 ., 1 2012 , , – 2631 . –

2011 – 11093,5 . , 98,6% 2010 .

80% 20% ( .1).

2010 1995 61%, – 66% ( 1).

.1. ) [1, .22]

, , , ,

, .

. ,

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1990 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

55

, , 200, 2012 289. ,

[1, .20]. 1

[2],

1995 2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010 /

1995 .%

283,61 193,47 141,48 132,36 120,33 116,14 111,93 39 7531 4958 3347 3096 2856 2737 2631 34

,

– ,

( )

" – – ".

: - ,

; -

; -

( );

- ; -

; - , ,

. ,

: - 2,2 11,25 .

2010 ( 1990 24,5 . ); -

; -

; - 4 . ,

, 50 ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

56

- (42,1% 2010 73,6% 1990 );

- , , ;

-

( – “ “ 2012 ); - ,

, [3]. .

, , . , ,

. , ,

. ,

, [3].

1. . 2011 - /

“ 1 (08), 2012 . 2. /

. 3. : http://www.infagro.com.ua/ru/Product/Yes/26/

Summary O.Kolos, assistant

Lviv national university of veterinary sciences and biotechnologie named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj

BACKGROUND AND FACTORS OF ECONOMIC SECURITY MILK BUSINESS

In the article the main preconditions and factors of economic security milk business,which determine the development of dairy production agriculture.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

57

334.021:82:334.7:338.432 ., ., . ©

.

, ,

.

. : , , ,

, .

. ,

, ,

.

.

, . ,

, , ,

, .

, ,

. .

, .

, .

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , .

. ,

.

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

58

, .

.

. .

.

. – ,

. integration .

, [3], –

( , , .).

( )

[3]. cooperation ,

.

,

, . , , .

, , , .

.

, , ,

, . , ,

, .

, .

,

. , , , ,

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

59

,

( ).

,

, . ,

, .

– .

.

.

, , .

.

, , ( ).

: . ,

. , ,

, ,

. -

. , .

,

, . ,

.

, ,

.

, . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

60

, , ,

. , .

,

. , ,

, , , .

,

. ,

, . ,

, , , ,

. , ,

, , .

, : ,

; ; ;

.

.

: .

, .

, .

, .

.

, . , , ,

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

61

. ,

. ,

, , ,

, . , , , ,

. ,

.

, . ,

.

.

, . ,

, , , , .

, ,

. ,

, , .

:

;

, .

, . ,

.

.

,

. –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

62

, .

, , ,

. , .

, . ,

. :

1) , ;

2) , . ( ), , ,

, .

, ( ), – ,

, . , ,

, , , .

, , ,

, . , ,

. , : -

, ; - .

,

. ,

.

, ,

. , » - , ,

. , , ,

. ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

63

, , ,

. , ,

. .

, ,

, .

, .

, -

.

, ,

.

1. . . / . . // . –

2010. – 3. – . 124-130. 2. . .

/ . . – [2- ., . .]. – . : , 2001. – 380 .

3. : 3- . - .2/ .: . . .) . – .: « », 2000. – .668.

4. . . / . . //

. – 2010. – 1. – . 107-115. 5. . .

/ . . , . . // . – 2010. – 3. – . 3-8.

Summary Korobka S. V.

INTEGRATION BETWEEN SMALL ENTERPRISES IN RURAL AREAS Against the background of world integration processes and consolidation of

businesses that are taking place in Ukraine, described a form of interaction for small business is an opportunity to increase economic size and its subsequent successful operation. The main types of cooperation and integration between small farms.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

64

:330.3:637.54 ., ., , ., ©

,

.

: , , , .

.

. , ,

. , .

. ,

, . .

, . , , , . , . . ,

. , . , , . ,

, .

, ,

, . .

. . , 2022 .

, – , – .

. , , ,

. 50 % . 1980 . 19 %

. 23 % 1990 . 30% 2011 . ,

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

65

2- . 2011 8596 . – 8614 . ( .1).

1 ( ) , .

2008 2009 2010 2011 84 8483 8570 8596

0 0 0 0 8400 8483 8570 8596

8450 8519 8577 8614 0 0 0 0

8450 8519 8577 8614 -50 -36 -7 18

, . 153 139 135 135

2.

2011 , (44,6 ), (39,3 ), (37,5 ) (35,1 ).

. 2

( ) ,

2008 2009 2010 2011 32,5 34,6 34,8 35,1

33,1 33,9 32,2 32,9 38,5 38,9 39,1 39,3

30,5 31,1 31,2 31,4 ( ) 9,6 9,8 10,1 10,3 ( ) 36,8 36,7 37,1 37,5

17,2 17,3 17,4 17,5

) 4,2 4,1 4,1 4,2

( ) 6,1 6,1 6,3 6,4 19,8 21.1 21,3 21.8

17,1 18,6 18,7 19,2 44,2 44,3 44,3 44,6

2 , .

, , . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

66

17,1 . , ,

44 . .

, 2009 , , 2008 , 1 - 22,7 .

1995– 2020 .

32 %. 97 % ,

. 52 % 38 % 1995 .

85 . ,

14 % . (46 %

), : (22 %), (9,1 %) (9 %).

, 1 % .

2% ( . 3). 3

( ) , .

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 8635 8660 8684 8713 8749 8782 8814

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8635 8660 8640 8713 8749 8782 8814

8649 8686 8723 8765 8814 8860 8904 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8649 8686 8723 8765 8814 8860 8904 -13 -26 -39 -52 -65 -78 -91

, . ( )

137 139 141 142 143 144

2018

(45,8 ), (39,4 ), (40,8 ) (37,8 ),

( . 4).

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

67

4 ( )

,

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 35,4 35,7 36,0 36,3 36,7 37,0 37,3

33,2 33,5 33,7 33,9 34,2 34,5 34,8 39,5 39,7 39,9 40,1 40,4 40,6 40,8

31,7 31,8 32,1 32,3 32,5 32,6 32,8 ( ) 10,6 10,8 11,1 11,3 11,5 11,7 11,9 ( ) 37,8 38,1 38,3 38,6 38,8 39,1 39,4

17,6 17,6 17,7 17,8 17,9 18,0 18,1

) 4,2 4,3 4.4 4,5 4,6 4,7 4,8

) 6,5 6,6 6,7 6,8 6,9 7,0 7,1 22,1 22,6 22,6 23,2 23,2 23,5 23,8

19,9 21,2 21,8 22,4 22,4 22,9 23,4 44,8 45,0 45,1 45,3 45,3 45,5 45,8

. ,

, .

, ,

, , ,

.

1. // . – 2010 – . 4(44) . – .14– 19.

2. // . – 2012. – 2(108) . – .76 – 78.

3 . www.farti.iastate.edu/outlook/2009 4. www.fao.org/index_ru.htm 5.http://www.chinafeedindustry.com 6.http://agritrade. cta. int/ 7.http://www. sourcejuice.com 8.http://www. agronews.ru

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

68

330.33:330.834:330.837 ., . ©

( ).

, . .

: , , , , ,

, .

. .

. , , ,

2004-2007 2008-2010 .

, . , (2001-2010)

. .

,

( ). , ,

. .

– , . . , . ,

. , . , . , . , . , . .

.

. , . , . , . . : . ,

. , . , . , . , . .

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

69

, . , .

, .

.

: ; ;

.

.

. , ( . , . , . , . , . .) ,

. , , ,

, , ,

, , , [3,6,10]. , – ,

. ,

, , ,

.

, ,

, , , , , .

, – , , .

.

. , ,

. , , .

, ,

. , , ,

. , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

70

. ,

, , . ,

.

: . , 1970 ,

).

(1975 .) (1976 .), ,

, , . ,

: ,

. , ,

, , . ,

« » .

. (1977) – « » . ,

« » , , – . ,

,

[6].

80- ., .

. . , . (1986), . .

(1988), . (1990), . . (1990) . . (1987)

[3,7,9].

, .

,

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

71

, . , ,

, – , , . , ,

, .

.

– , , . ,

, , , ,

. . ,

, . ,

, , .

, 2000-2010 . ( . 1),

, . 1

2000-2010 .

, %

, %

, . .

,

.

,

. .

, %

) ,

. .

2000 105,9 125,8 1207 -516 571 161,9 3651,5 2001 109,2 106,1 1402 -188 983 106,47 4029 2002 105,2 99,4 3173 -1050 1238 107,12 6994,85 2003 109,6 108,2 2891 247 2185 157,95 -1043,1 2004 112,1 112,3 6909 -4332 2539 141,61 -9133,7 2005 102,7 110,3 2531 8038 10721 142,16 -7645,7 2006 107,3 111,6 -1617 3932 2408 121,32 -3599,3 2007 107,9 116,6 -5918 15776 9421 127,12 -8293,8 2008 102,1 122,3 -12763 9700 -3063 138,58 -9768 2009 85 112,3 -1801 -11925 -13726 100,37 -17037 2010 104,2 109,1 -2884 7914 5030 133,5 -56104,21

: , ,

. , .

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

72

, ,

. ( ) .

161,9

106,47 107,12

157,95

141,61 142,16

121,32

127,12

138,58

100,37

133,5

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

%

. 1. 2000-2010

. 1, ,

. , 2004 (41,6 %) –

(12,1%). . ,

. ,

. 2

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

, %

23,1 13,5 20,4 22,2 24,3 34,2 29,3 28,1 31,2 33,5 22,8

: . 2, 2004 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

73

20%, 30%. , ,

. . 2005 .

(102,7%) (10,3 %). ,

. , , .

, . . ,

. ,

. ,

. – .

– .

– . , .

, ,

. , ,

. ,

– . ,

– . , –

. , , , , ,

, , . , ,

. . .

, , , ,

. , .

.

, . . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

74

: .

. .

, .

, .

. ,

. , .

, ,

, . (

, ) 28% 2010- .

. “ – ,

.

” [8, 119]. :

, , , ,

. , .

, , ,

. , , , ,

. ,

. ,

. .

,

. ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

75

, .

. , : –

– . ,

. 3. 3

,

, . . , . ,

. . 2000 31 154,60 13 956, 553 71 1 207,00 2001 33 170,00 15 775, 092 66 1 402,00 2002 35 530,15 16 976, 834 51 3 173,00 2003 56 120,00 23 020, 771 01 2 891,00 2004 79 471,50 28 996, 030 72 6 909,00 2005 112 975,90 36 141, 094 96 2 531,00 2006 137 063,00 45 034, 491 10 -1 617,00 2007 174 236,00 60 669, 923 00 -5 918,00 2008 241 454,00 85 535, 356 40 -12 763,00 2009 242 357,00 45 435, 559 20 -1 801,00 2010 323 556,20 60 739, 969 30 -2 884,00

: , ,

( 0,86). , , ,

, ). ,

, .

( -0,67) . ,

. , . ,

. -0,87.

. , ,

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

76

, , ( )

. .

4 , ,

, . .

, %

, .

.

, .

,

. 2000 31 154,60 20,50 3 198,00 3 875,00 -516,00 2001 33 170,00 15,70 2 980,00 4 555,30 -188,00 2002 35 530,15 10,81 3 293,00 5 471,80 -1 050,00 2003 56 120,00 9,75 4 065,00 6 794,40 247,00 2004 79 471,50 11,24 6 391,00 9 047,00 -4 332,00 2005 112 975,90 7,25 9 011,00 16 890,00 8 038,00 2006 137 063,00 9,26 12 861,00 21 607,30 3 687,00 2007 174 236,00 6,71 18 618,00 29 542,70 15 776,00 2008 241 454,00 11,86 17 059,00 35 616,40 9 700,00 2009 242 357,00 12,21 15 567,00 40 053,00 -11 925,00 2010 323 556,20 10,39 20 002,00 44 708,00 7 914,00

: , ,

, ,

, , . ,

( – 0,28). ,

. ,

. . ,

.

,

. ( ) ,

. .

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

77

, . , , , ,

.

. ,

. , [2, 86]. ,

.

. , ,

.

.

. , ,

. , , . ,

. ,

. 1998

. 2000- .

2004- , .

.

( ). ( ).

,

” [1].

, , .

. .

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

78

. , .

– , ,

. .

.

. ( )

. .

. ,

.

, .

( ). .

1. . . : : . –

2- ., . . – .: , 2008. – 663 . 2. . .

: . – : , 2001. 3. Alesina, A. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy / A. Alesina, N.

Roubini, G. Cohen. – Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999. – 302 p. 4. Coakley, J. Kulasi, F., Smith, R. The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle and Capital

Mobility: A Review. International Journal of Finance and Economics. 1998, 169-188 No. 3 : http://dipeco.economia.unimib.it/ Persone/ Colombo/ finarm/ feldstein-horioka-review.pdf

5. Cukierman, A. Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government, and the Benefits of Constitution / A. Cukierman, A.A. Meltzer // Economic Inquiry.. – 1986. – Vol. 24. – P. 367-388.

6. Hibbs D. Political Parties and Macroeconomics Policy / D. Hibbs // American Political Science Review. – 1977. – Vol. 71. – P. 1467-1487. Nordhaus, W. The Political Business Cycle / W. Nordhaus // Review of Economic Studies. – 1975. – Vol. 42. – P. 169-190.

7. Persson T. Designing Institutions for Monetary Stability / T. Persson, G. Tabellini // Carnegie- Rocyester Conference Series on Public Policy. – 1994. – Vol. 39. – P. 58-94.

8. International Monetary Fund. Sixth Edition of the IMF's Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. : http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bopman6.htm

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

79

9. Rogoff, K. Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles / K. Rogoff // American Economic Review. – 1990. – Vol. 80. – P. 21-36.

10. Rogoff, K. Elections and Macroeconomic Police Cycles / K. Rogoff, A. Sibert // Review of Economic Studies.. – 1988. – Vol. 55. – P. 1-16.

11. Tsanacas D., Kasibhatla K., Malindretos J., A Survey of the Monetary Approach to International Finance // Balance of Payment Adjustment: Macro Facets of International Facets Revisited / A. Arize, H. Bonitsis, I. Kallianotis, K. Kasibhatla, and J. Malindretos. – London: Greenwood Press, 2000. – P. 24-30

Summary Yuriy Myronovych, Nazar Lypko

Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Svobody Av., 18. 79008, Lviv, Ukraine

IMPACT OF POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLE ON UKRAINE’S EXTERNAL BALANCE

Relation between a political business cycle and external balance is considered in the article. The authors provide expanded explanation of the main aspects of the theory of a political business cycle and external balance. Analysis of the impact of political business cycle on external balance is made on Ukraine’s example.

Key words: political business cycle, external balance, capital mobility, opportunistic theory, current account, capital account.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

80

336.717.061 ., , ©

( )

, . ,

, .

, .

: , , , .

.

( ) .

. , ,

. .

, .

, .

,

.

, - ,

.

– – [1-3].

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

81

. ,

. .

,

. ,

, , [1].

. ,

. , ,

,

, , , , .

- , , ,

. . 1 , (

).

. 1.

: – ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – .

, ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

82

, , .

.

. 2.

. 2.

.

: – ; –

; –

; – ; –

; – .

, -

, , , . . -

, .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

83

, , ,

.

. : – ,

;

– ; – ; – ; – , ; – ; – ; – , ; –

. . ,

,

.

. , – ,

. .

.

, : , ,

. , ,

.

. . ,

, , , . ,

( – 0,15-0,25%), ,

. .

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

84

, .

, .

, , . – .

. , , -

. , , , , , .

. , , -

. ( ,

, ) ,

[2]. .

– ,

, , [3].

, ,

[4]. – .

. 3.

. 3.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

85

, , , , , ,

, , , , .

, . – ,

. . .

. ,

, ,

, , ,

. ,

, , ,

, .

. , , ,

. , , ,

, ,

.

1. : . . / . – 2- , . . // .: . ,

2004. – 172 . 2. ., .

/ http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/PORTAL/

soc_gum/KNP/147/knp147_73-76.pdf 3. : . . .

. . . / . ., . ., . . . . . . // .: , 2009. – 472 . 4. http://met-online.kiev.ua/menu/dovidka/inko/

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

86

Summary Pelenskyy R.A., magister, bread-winner

Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnologies named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj

A SPECIFIC OF LOGISTIC IS DURING REALIZATION OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY BY ENTERPRISES OF UKRAINE (FEA) The logistic during realization of FEA is characterized by original features

which arise out of necessity of crossing of state boundaries processing of corresponding custom documents. In addition it is necessary to take into account features legislations of the states, which international transportations are carried out through. The requirements formulated to that end are to the construction of the effective logistic systems of enterprises, which carry out foreign economic activity.

Key words: logistic, foreign economic activity, international transportations, custom border.

– ., . . . .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

87

338.46:636.09 ., ., ,

., ., ©

. ,

. : , ,

, .

.

.

. , .

, 90 % , .

.

.

, . .

.

. ,

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . ,

. .

. . , “ , , ,

” [2, .45]. . ,

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

88

[4, . 46–47]. ,

[3, . 143]. . ,

,

, [1].

. .

.

. , ,

, , ,

, .

. .

90%.

. ,

. , .

.

( . 1). 1

( )

2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 . 2011 . 2011 .

% 2007 .

. - -

371065

898

370167

323407

854

322553

322373

762

321611

321895

653

321242

319883

459

319424

86,2

50,8

86,3

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

89

. 1 – , .

. . . :

- -

564,40

93,43

470,97

573,67

96,90

440,73

538,78

114,85

423,93

537,16

119,04

418,12

501,53

117,15

384,38

88,9

125,4

81,6

, . .:

- -

104,04

1,27

113,47

1,37

150,73

1,32

182,30

1,30

255,23

1,20

2,5

94,5 : .

. .

.

.

2007 2011 2,5 , , – 25,4 % ( . 1).

.

2011 , , 18,3 % , ,

.

( . 2). 2

2011

,

-

,

49 86 52,4

50-99 22 13,4 100-199 26 15,9

,

200-499 16 9,8 500 14 8,5

: 164 100 : .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

90

.

, , ( . 3).

3 ,

2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 . 2010 .

2010 .

2006 . –

, . 7130,6 8312,3 14918,2 17644,2 18984,0 2,7

.: -

- ;

6698,4 7786,3 14176,6 16867,1 17688,3 2,6

- , -

432,2 559,6 741,6 777,1 1295,7 3,0

: .

.

, .

2010 42 .

. 2010

6,8%.

. 6,7 17,7 . . 2010 . 93,2 % ( . 3).

, . , ,

. - ( ) 2010 0,87,

. ,

0,18. ,

.

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

91

, .

.

.

. ,

. 5- . :

(4,08 ), (3,67 )

(3,35 ). :

) ; )

, , ,

; )

, ; ) ,

. ,

, , 5- , (4,53 ),

(4,45 ) (4,24 ).

, . ,

, ,

.

, ,

.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

92

, 1991

. ,

, ,

.

. .

1. . / . // : : 5 :

[ ] – : http://conftiapv.at.ua/publ/konf_14_15_grudnja_2011_r/sekcija_5_ekonomichni_nauki/teoretichni_osnovi_veterinarnogo_obslugovuvannja/29-1-0-1247.

2. . . / . . // . –

2000. – 7. – . 45–50. 3. . .

/ . . // . : . – 2010. – 4. – C. 143–145.

4. . / . , . // . - 1998. - 8. - . 46-47.

5. . . / . . , . . – .: – 2001. – . 124–144.

Summary Poperechnyi S. I., Babych L. V.

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhytskyi, Lviv, Ukraine

FORMATION OF AREA VETERINARY SERVICE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MARKET RELATIONS

The problems of market relations in the field of veterinary service are considered. The reasons of hinder the development of entrepreneurship are analyzed.

Key words: veterinary services, veterinary services market, monopoly, private veterinary practice.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

93

339.138:619 ., .,

., .,

. .

.

. : , ,

.

. ,

. .

.

. .

.

. , . , . ,

. , . , . , . , . , . ,

. , . , . , . , . , . , . .

. , – “ ,

.. ,

” [6, . 638].

, . “ ”. “ ,

, ” [2, . 8; 3, . 7].

. . , [13, . 46].

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

94

“ ”, ”,

, “ , , ”, ,

, , , [3, . 3; 14, . 262]. ,

, [7, . 43; 12, . 13].

, [12, . 13]. ,

. , , [8, . 8; 2, . 8].

. . . ,

“ , ”, (product, goods and services),

goods ( ) services ( ) , [11; 5, . 5].

, . : “ – ,

, ( ), ” [192, . 25].

, “ ” [40, . 8].

– , , [44, . 43].

, – [10, . 25].

, ;

, ; ,

. . .

,

[1, . 34]. “ ”

, “ “ “ , ,

, ,

, ” [9].

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

95

, .

. “ ”

, ,

,

. .

, ,

, – .

, ,

. ,

.

, , .

, ,

.

( . 1).

. 1.

– –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

96

,

. ,

: , , , , , , , ,

, . , , ,

, , .

.

. ,

.

. , ,

. , .

. “ ” ,

, .

, , ,

– . ,

, .

.

. . .

, . ,

, . .

. ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

97

. ,

. .

. – ,

.

, , , .

, , .

: , , ,

. , , . ,

.

. – . ,

, -,

. ,

, ,

. ,

.

. –

, .

.

, , . ,

. ,

, . ,

– , . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

98

, , .

( , , )

. .

. .

1.

. 2.

, .

3. .

1. . .

/ . . , . . // . : “ ”. – 2011. –

.2. – .1. – . 32–38. 2. . . : /

. . , . . . – .: , 2001. – 128 . 3. . : , ,

/ . // . – 1997. – 6. – . 2–5.

4. . . / . . // . – 1998. – 8. – .

42–52. 5. . .

] / . . // . – 2003. – 5. – . 3–21. – :

http://www.dis.ru//library/market/archive/2003/5/328.html. 6. . . – .: , 1992. – 732 . 7. . . ,

/ . . // . – 2001. – 9–10. – . 43–47.

8. . . / . . . – . : , 1996. – 128 .

9. : 25.06.1992 2498-12 ( ) [ ] // . – 1992. –

36. – : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2498-12. 10. / . , . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

99

. , . ; . . . – 2- . – . : , 2002. – 752 .

11. . : / . // . – 1997. – 6. – . 115–120.

12. . / . // ( ). – 1999. – 1. – . 13–15.

13. Gronroos C. Service management and marketing / C. Gronroos. – West Sussex, 2000. – P. 1, 46, 48.

14. Rosenberg J. M. Dictionary of marketing and advertising (Business dictionary series) / J. M. Rosenberg. – New York ; Chichester ; Brisbane, 1995. – P. 140, 262, 310.

Summary Poperechnyi S. I., Babych L. V.

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhytskyi, Lviv, Ukraine

MARKETING ACTIVITY IN VETERINARY SERVICE The theoretical problems of forming veterinary service are considered. The

forming of system of marketing elements considering features of veterinary service and its embranchment by potential customer is proposed.

Key words: marketing services, veterinary services, features of veterinary services.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

100

65:011 ., ., ., ©

.

, -

.

. -

. .

. , , , ,

.

. , , ,

, . 2010

. ,

( ). 2011

. " ". ,

, - ( -

).

, .

- , ,

. , .

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

101

" ".

. ( . Henry

Morgenthau) - , , , 1934 1945 .

, , : " , , ,

".

. " ".

" [1-3].

.

.

, , ,

, . ,

. , ,

, – " – ".

, [4, . 77-78].

.

, .

, , , - Openness Growth Monitoring Model

[5].

, ,

, [6].

2005 . ( ) " ".

:

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

102

, , . " " -

: -

( ); - ; - .

" " ("Globalization Index"),

A.T. Kearney Foreign Policy.

, : 1) – ,

( . . ), ; 2) ,

, ; 3) , –

; 4) , [7].

("Index bioethical capacity for globalization"). : -

("The index of economic capacity for globalization"); -

("Index of ecological and economic capacity

for globalization").

. , -

.

, " [3, . 316-319].

. ,

: 1) ; 2)

; 3)

( ) ; 4)

( )

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

103

. .

: 1)

; 2) -

; 3)

" "

; 4) .

. .

: , , ; ,

- . ,

.

, " " -

. , , : 1)

, , - , - ,

) ,

, ; 2) ,

1991–2000 . , , , ,

; 3) ; 4)

.

-

( . 1). , 2 -. –

): ( , , ) ( )

( ). –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

104

): ( ) , ( ,

, ) .

: ( ) ( , ,

, , , , )

.

.1. ( )

:

: ;

; ;

.

.

. 1.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

105

1.

:

-

1.

: 1) ;

2) ; 3) ;

4) .

)

. 2.

, : 1) ;

2) -;

3) ; 4) ;

5) ; 6)

.

( ).

3.

, ,

: 1)

( ); 2)

( ); 3)

( ); 4)

); 5)

( ); 6)

).

,

, .

.

4.

:

1) ;

2) ;

3) ;

4) .

. ,

.

,

. 2.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

106

2

:

.

1.

,

; ;

; .

2.

, ;

- (

). 3.

, .

4.

(

– )

, ,

, ,

, .

5.

,

, .

, , , ,

. ,

.

6.

,

. " ".

. 7.

, ,

, .

, ,

. 8.

,

.

,

– ,

" " " ". ,

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

107

. 9. ,

, .

1 .

, , ,

. 10.

( , , ,

)

-

. ,

; .

,

) . 3. , ,

, . 3.

:

1.

,

. 2.

- , .

, , ,

, . 3.

. 4.

,

, ,

, ,

,

. ,

. 5.

, ,

, 50%,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

108

- 58%. 21,7 , 37,3%.

6.

( ). ,

,

, , ,

, .

1. , ,

, 25% , –

14–15% , , .

2. ,

– , ,

. ,

, .

3. -

- ,

,

. 4.

55% , .

, , , , ,

, , , , .

– ,

, .

5. "

.

.

6.

2007 .

68,5%, – 14%;

.

( ) . 4.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

109

4.

( )

:

1.

" "

.

, , , " -

") .

, ,

.

2.

, ,

.

3. :

,

– .

, , .

4. -

, . :

. , .

(

, ). .

5.

, : , , ,

, .

6.

. )

( ), -

– .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

110

7.

,

,

,

. ,

,

.

.

(

) . 5. 5.

( )

:

1

, , : -

, ; ,

,

; ,

. 2

:

; -.

, –

. 3

,

, - .

, , , , ,

, , ,

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

111

. 4.

-

,

– –

, .

5.

, ,

. 6.

,

,

, .

7.

,

. , ,

, .

( ;

; ).

8.

;

);

.

" "

. . 2.

: 1) ; 2) ; 3) ; 4) ; 5)

; 6) . " "

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

112

. 2.

" " 2008-2009

:

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

113

.

( . 3).

. 3.

:

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

114

– . 4.

. 4.

:

:

;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

115

; (

) ; (

) .

.

: ;

;

" " ;

.

: , , ; ,

; ,

; ,

; , , . ,

; , , ; ,

, .

: 1)

; 2)

; 3) .

1. Morgenthau .J. Politics among Nations. / .J. Morgenthau. - New York,

1967. - P. 3. 2. . . : /

, . . - .: , 3- ., . ., 2007. - 461 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

116

3. . : / . [ . ]. – :

" ", ., ., 2011. – 440 .

4. . : , , / . . - .: . – 2005. – 4.

– . 76–79. 5. M.A.R., Yap S.F. The openness growth monitoring model (OGM-Model) //

Journal of Policy Modeling. – 2006. – Vol. 28. – Pp. 235-246. 6. . .

/ . , . : . . . : .: . – 2004. – 69. – . 35–43.

7. OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators [ ]: OECD, 2005. – : http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/

display.asp]. Summary

Pun’ko B.M. REAL CRITERIA GROWTH RATE OF OPENNESS AND

PRAGMATIC NATIONAL OF THE ECONOMY IN GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.

It is set forth indexes-table data that represent of reason-consequences intercommunications at global level of economy are set forth. The methodological features of design of monitoring of increase of openness and pragmaticness of national economy are generalized. The algorithms of logic-schematic design of intercommunications and determination of criteria of development of national economy are presented in a global environment. The conceptual whole adjusting of external economy and bank climate is distinguished.

Key words. Reason-consequencesi intercommunications, openness and pragmaticness of national economy, criteria, conceptual aims, adjustings.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

117

338.439.5: 636.5 ., . . . ©

. .

: , , , .

. [3, . 93]. ,

, ,

, .

, , ,

, ,

.

. . , . . , . . , . . , . . .

, ,

. .

, , . .

. .

, :

; , ,

, ;

, ,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

118

, ( . 1).

. 1. .

-

,

,

,

)

-

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

119

: . ,

– ,

, .

.

, , , . .

, , , , .

, , , , ,

, , .

. ,

:

. , ,

– , . ,

, , .

. ,

.

,

.

.

, , 1000 . ,

, , . 1.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

120

,

, , .

1

,

1

000

.

,

,

.

,

.

,

.

,

.

0,95 0,63 0,91 0,91 0,95 0,67 0,91

: 2000-2010 .

, , ,

. . 2.

2

,

1

(

)

,

’ (

)

, .

’ (

)

, .

(

)

, .

’ (

)

, .

0,967 0,949 0,953 0,909 0,829 0,034 0,97

: 2000-2010 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

121

, ,

, . ,

, , , ,

. .

, ,

, .

1. . . : [ ] / . . –

: http://www.books.efaculty.kiev.ua. 2. . .

[ ]. – : http:// www.credit-rating.com.ua.

3. . . / . . . – : , 2000. – 450 .

Summary Sendetska S. V.

MAIN DIRECTIONS AND GOALS OF THE STATE REGULATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS MARKET

The system of aims of different state regulation levels for poultry products market was formed in this article.

Key words: poultry products market, state market regulation, eggs, poultry meat.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

122

339.138:637.11 ., ©

. . .

.

. : , ,

. .

. : ,

; ;

;

, ;

, .

, ;

, .

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , , . , . , . , . , . .

. , . , . , . .

,

, .

© . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

123

.

. :

- ;

- ;

- ;

:

. ,

.

.

, ,

. . - ,

, , ,

. ,

. (

) .

. ,

, . , ,

. . ,

. , .

4 .

, , . ,

, . , - .

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

124

, ,

, ,

. –

, , , .

. ,

. , , -

, , , . ,

– , , , , , ,

, , , ,

,

. ,

, , , ,

. , : ,

; ; ; ;

. ,

.

: - ; - ; - ; - .

. 1.

: , 40 %

, .

2. – . : ; ;

; ; .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

125

3.

, , , ,

:

, ;

, ,

;

;

, .

4. ,

, , .

1. . : , ,

: . - .: , 2001. - 320 . 2. - 2005 - 21;

2. . . / . . // . – 2008 - 5. – . 61

– 64. 3. . .

/ . // : : ». – 2007. - 6. – . 250-260.

4. . . // . . . – :

», 2005. – 240 .

Summary Seniv R.V.

Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnogies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj

SOME ASPECTS OF IMPROVING MARKETING PRODUCERS OF MILK IN LVIV

Some aspects of improving marketing enterprises for the production of milk. A formation of a regional vertical marketing system is based on molocharska Association.

Key words: milk, marketing activities, dairy production. – ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

126

: 65.015.6:637’6 ., .

.

: , , , .

.

, ,

. ,

, . ,

. ,

. ,

, .

, ,

.

- .

,

. .

. ., B. ., . .

. ., . ., . ., . ., . . , . ,

, , , – .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

127

.

. .

.

, . , 2009 , 01.01.2012

11,1% 24158 , – 13,8% 28990

( . 1, . 2). 1

,

2009 2010 2011 2011 . % 2009 .

27177 24167 24158 88,9 18238 15080 14627 80,2

3995 3728 3919 98,2 386 215 188 48,7

3283 2675 2424 73,8 1219 953 1293 106,1

650 551 276 42,5 1952 1761 1843 94,4 6426 4896 4374 68,1 327 301 310 94,8

4282 4515 4784 111,7 834 742 581 69,7

1345 1817 2264 168/,3 403 403 354 87,8

383 300 298 77,8 90 75 121 134.4

1227 1178 1166 95,0 4638 4465 4727 101,9

2008 1895 1903 94.8 2045 2046 2193 107.2

199 202 199 100,0 386 322 432 111,9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

128

.

.

, .

,

,

, , ( . 2). 2

, ,

2009 2010 2011 2011 . % 2009 .

33631 289922 28990 86,2 22742 18199 16670 73,3

4167 3639 3878 93,1 963 546 265 27,5

5264 3812 3215 61,1 1620 1430 1601 98,8

621 654 332 43,4 2130 2087 1950 91,5 7704 5763 5218 67,7 273 268 211 77,3

6105 5584 7170 117,4 1273 1101 1123 88,2

2642 2371 3883 146,9 353 327 263 74,6

332 277 247 74,5 343 70 302 88,1

1162 1438 1352 116,4 4850 5068 5125 105,7

1796 1866 1731 96,4 2673 2757 2867 107,2

207 271 257 124,2 174 174 270 155,2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

129

, :

- , ,

; - ,

,

; - ,

; - , , ; - ; -

;

- ,

; -

, , .

, ,

.

. , , .

, ,

, ,

, , ,

, .

. , . 3 , , 2009 2011 ,

, 2009

482 , 2011 - 510 , 42 , 2010 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

130

3

, 2009 2010 2011 2011 . %

2009 . 482 468 510 105,8

539 478 465 86,3 385 360 418 108,6

594 570 411 69,2 848 563 540 63,7 667 494 483 72,4

504 485 404 80,2 391 463 474 121,2 428 400 489 114,2 494 485 503 108,8

496 460 556 112,1 503 496 594 118.1

848 728 794 93,6 364 311 291 110.2

340 388 381 112.1 532 339 814 153,0

391 501 464 118,7 408 481 443 108,5

364 378 375 103,2 575 743 743 129,2

458 525 370 80,8 236 279 285 120,7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

, .

. , 2009 25,0 . ,

2011 – 21,9 . , 3,1 . , 12,3%. ( . 4).

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

131

4

, , 2009 2010 2011 2011 . %

2009 . 36895 3976 63217 171,3

25001 25297 21918 87,7 4227 5996 7663 181,3

2127 570 109 5,1 4927 4617 2615 53,1 2012 1680 1424 70,8

' - 490 1056 1572 320,8 1676 2289 2147 128,1 9204 8783 6146 66,8 338 306 242 71,6

8008 9417 27260 340.4 1713 1759 1690 98.7

3702 5504 22922 619.2 71 310 90 126.7

575 446 165 28.7 695 92 1118 160.8

1252 1306 1275 101,8 3877 4352 14025 361.7

1080 1000 1236 114.4 2513 3129 12516 490.1

122 121 70 57,4 162 102 203 125,3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

, , , ,

, –

, .

, , ,

. . ,

:

1.

. 2.

-

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

132

, –

.

3.

. 4.

)

, . 5.

,

. 6.

.

1. . .

: [ ] / . ., . ., . . – : , 2011.

– 184 . 2. : [ ] /

. ., . ., . . .] ; . . . . – . : , 2005. – 496 .

3. 2015 // 19 2007

1158. – ., 2007 – 71 . 4. //

20 2008 729 ]. – : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/

show/729-2008-%D0%BF 5. .

1 2010 . . – . – 2011. – 28 .

6. . 2011 .

. – , – 2012. – 26 . – ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

133

330.341.1:636.2 ., ., 1, ., 2©

1 ( . ) 2

.

, .

: , , , , , .

.

, , ,

.

, ,

. 2050 .

9 . , 67 %.

2000-2011 . , 2012 .

. .

.

2010-2014 . “ , , ”,

“… , ” [1].

2012 .

,

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

134

. . . [2]

,

: “ , ” [2, . 15].

. , . .

[3], . , . [4], . , . , . C

. [5], . [6], . [7], . [8],

.

, ..

.

. , .

,

. . . . . , “

” [4 ,c.6]. .

. 2011 . 20,1 . ., 3,2 . . 2010 .

. [8], .

,

( ) .

,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

135

. ,

, .

. [6],

.

, , [9]:

f (ns) = (ns) maxmin (1),

.

. ,

.

1 .

“ ” 50

,

. 2011 . 42,5 . .

, ,

. ,

. . [10],

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

136

.

, . ,

, , 70-75 20

.

3,5-4,5 . ,

.

,

, . ,

, . 70 %

, 25 %-

, 5 % - . .

, ,

: 1) ; 2)

; 3)

; 4)

; 5) .

1. 2010-2014 .

, , ” – .: , 2010. – 87 . -[ ]. – . – www.

president.gov.ua.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

137

2. . / . , . . – .: ,

2012. – 48 . 3. . / . , . // . –

2011. - 2. – . 188 – 199. 4. 2020 / [ . . , . - ]. – .:

”, 2012. – 182 . 5. . / .

// . – 2001. - 11. - . 3-28. 6. Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation / R. Axelrod. – New York:

Basic Books, 1984. – 486 p. 7. Allen P.M. Modelling Evolution and Creativity in Complex Systems / P.

M. Allen // World Futures. – 1992. – Vol. 34. – P. 105-123. 8. . / . –

.: , 2009. – 461 . 9. Wuchy S. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in the Production of

Knowledge / S. Wuchy, F. J. Benjamin, U. Brian // Science. – 2007. – N. 317. – P. 1036-1039.

10. . . , / . .

– .: , 1982. – 436 .

Summary Chemerys V.A., Ph.D1., Solomonko D.O.2

1Institute of Regional Science NAS of Ukraine 2Lviv National University of Biotechnologies and Veterinary Medicine

named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj STRATEGIC PRIORITIES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DAIRY

FARMING ENTERPRISES IN UKRAINE In the article main tendencies of innovative development of agribusiness in Ukraine dairy farming in the concept of sustainable development are considered. Key words: agrarian sector, development, entrepreneurship,dairy farming, strategy, region.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

138

631.11:338.3 ., ©

.

.

. : , ,

, , , .

.

. .

. ,

.

, .

: . , . , . , . , . , . , . ,

. , . , . , . [1-8] . , ,

. ,

.

. .

,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

139

.

. , ,

. . , ,

,

, . , .

: ? ,

, [9, .222-223]. ,

– , - ( . 1).

, :

- ; - , ; - .

1 [9, .222-223].

1

, 1 :

,

2.

,

2 ,

3 ,

,

3. GAP- , LOTS- , SWOT-

4 ,

4 ,

, GE/Mc-Kinsey . 5. (

PIMS)

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

140

, , , ,

. , , 2010 .

, %:

– 73,3; – 18,2 – 8,1.

. , ,

, : ,

.

, , , .

. , 1,

. , ,

: , .

, 1.

, , , ,

. – –

. , ,

, ,

. . ,

XX – XXI . -

, , .

. , .

, , .

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

141

. ,

.

, , .

, ,

,

. ,

.

, 1.

. ,

.

. ,

, . , ,

, ,

, . ,

, , .

, , .

, .

, , .

, .

« » [9, .222].

. , , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

142

( , , )

. .

, ,

: , . , , .

. , 1, ,

. .

« » : , »

[10, .278]. , – , » [11, .487].

.

. 1,

, , , ,

. ,

, .

. , ,

. ,

.

.

1. ., .

/ , // : . –

2010. – 17(2). – .3-8. 2. . :

: / . . . – .: . – 270 .

3. . / . . – .: , 2003. – 324 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

143

4. . / . // : ,

: / . . . – : , 2008. – .140-154.

5. . : , , / . . – : , 2008. – 520 .

6. . . / . – . Port-Roal, 2001. – 684 .

7. . / . , . . – .: , , 1997. – 800 .

8. . / // : . – 2010. –

17(2). – . .9-14. 9. : . . / . . ,

, , , . – .: , 2007. – 744 . 10. : 65 000 / .

. . , . . : « », 2006. – 1008 . 11. : . .1 / .. .

) . – : « », 2000. – 864 .

Summary Shulskyy A.M, postgraduate student

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after SZ Gzhytskij

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OF AGRICULTURAL The article analyzed the functioning of the advantages of existing organizational

and economic structures in the system of agriculture based on the use of certain developments in this area. The measures for more efficient use of advantages of individual farm units.

Key words: competitive advantage, agrarian formation, agrarian production, private farms, farm enterprise.

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

144

330.33: 631.11 ., ., ©

. .

, ,

, . : , ,

, , , .

. , . – ,

, , .

. , , ,

.

, , .

,

.

, . , ,

, ,

, . .

. . ,

, , , 2003 . 93,2% ? ,

, , , .

,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

145

, .

, , .

, , ,

, . ,

. : . , . , . ,

. , , . , . , . . , . , . [1-7] . :

, –

. , ,

. , ,

, .

, . .

.

, .

.

, . ,

, 2003 . [8].

, , ,

. .

, – , .

, .

« ». , , «

» [8] , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

146

, , . , , ,

, . . « »

, « ». , . ,

, ? ,

, . ,

, , , .

. , ,

« » ( «

»), . , .

– . , , ,

. 1

*

1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2008 . 2010 . 2010 . % 1995 . 2005 .

.- . , . . 412,1 642,8 797,6 799,0 796,1 193,2 99,8

.- . , % 32,3 50,4 62,8 63,0 62,9 +30,6 +0,1

219,1 388,1 519,2 519,2 523,5 238,9 100,8

, % 25,6 47,1 65,1 65,1 65,7 +40,1 +0,6

100

.- . , . .** 281,5 729,9 481,5 415,6 391,3 57,4 81,3

: 325,8 341,7 226,4 217,5 207,8 63,8 91,8 355,7 388,2 255,1 198,1 183,5 51,6 71,9

: * 2010 [9];

** 2005 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

147

,

. , , , , ( )

( ) .

1995 - 2010 . 1 ,

100

. , :

XXI , 100

– 2005 . , . ,

, 2000 ., 100

.

. 2. 2

, , 2005 .

1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2008 . 2010 . 2010 . %

1995 . 2005 –

, . . 2702,7 3592,4 3635,6 3366,8 3083,7 114,1 84,8

: 1291,9 1681,8 1709,3 1762,1 1637,7 126,8 95,8 1410,8 1910,6 1926,3 1604,7 1446,0 102,5 75,1

,

,% 68,5 90,8 89,6 78,3 73,7 +5,2 -15,9

: 66,4 88,2 88,8 80,4 77,9 +11,5 -10,9 70,6 93,1 90,3 76,1 69,6 -1,0 -20,7

, 2010 .

1995 . . , , 14,1%,

: – 26,8 % – 2,5%. , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

148

( . 1). 93,2%, – 138,9%. , ,

.

, ,

. :

? , , . ,

( . 1), ( . 2) ( 15,2%), –

( 4,2%) ( 24,9%).

.

. , .

. .

. ,

, . , , 2010 . -3676 ,

-317 . [9, . 213]. , , . -

, .

, , . .

. .

, . , , . , ,

.

. .

.

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

149

, , ,

. , ,

, , ,

. ,

? , , , . . , ,

( , , )

. .

. . ,

, , , ,

. .

: - , ,

, , , ,

. , , ;

- . , ,

, , ;

-

. ,

; -

, , , .

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

150

– , .

1. . :

/ . // : / . .

. – .: , 2010. – . 123 - 132. 2. . :

/ . , . , . , . // : . – 2010. –

17 (2). – . 234 - 238. 3. . :

/ . // . – 2010. – 10. – . 112 - 115.

4. . : / . // . – 2005. – 9-10. – . 15 - 23.

5. . / , //

: . . . – . : , , 2009. – . 43 - 54.

6. .

/ . // : : . – 2007. – 12. – . 489 - 494.

7. . . : , . / . . – :

», - 2003. – 280 . 8. « » 15

2003 ., 742 – V. 9. 2010 . 1 /

. . . – , 2011. – 362 .

Summary Shulskyy M.G

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after SZ Biotechnologies, Lviv, Ukraine.

ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL FARMS LVIV Activity of the personal peasant economies of population of the Lviv area is

investigational, what reasons that brake their development are set as a result of, and also concrete measures are offered in relation to their removal.

Key words: private farms, lands, gross output, forms management, crop production, animal husbandry

– ., .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

151

338.43:636.3+636.39 ., .,

. .

.

. : , , ,

, , , .

.

, .

, .

. , , ,

, , , .

. -,

. , ,

. – . .

, , .

, , », «

» , ,

.

.

, , , . , , , , ,

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

152

. : . , . , . , . , . , . , . , .

, . , . [1-8] . , ,

, . , .

.

. ,

. .

.

. ,

, .

, .

[9;10]. ,

( , ).

, : 1990-2010 .

, : :

, ,

. 1.

- 64,0 . . 1990

. 22,6 . 2010 ., 2010 . 35,3% 1990 . 2000 . ,

. ,

. , , 1990 . 64,0 . , 50,5 . ,

13,5 . , 21,1 %, , 2010 . : 22,6; 5,4;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

153

17,2 76,1. 2000-2010 . .

1*

, .

1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . %

1990 . 2000 .

, : 64,0 42,3 33,5 23,5 22,6 35,3 67,5

50,5 18,7 8,2 5,2 5,4 10,7 65,9 13,5 23,6 25,3 18,3 17,2 127,4 68,0

, %

21,1 55,8 75,5 77,9 76,1 +55,0 +0,6

, ,

: 43,0* 67,2**

8,2 19,2

0,7 2,1

1,0 4,3

2,0 8,5

4,7 -58,7

285,7 +6,4

43,0 85,1

8,2 43,5

0,6 7,3

0,8 15,4

1,5 27,5

3,5 -57,6

250 +20,2

- - 0,1 0,3

0,2 1,1

0,5 2,9 - 500,0

, % - - 42,9 20,0 25,0 - +17,9

,

: 21,0** 32,8***

34,1 80,8

32,8 97,9

22,5 95,7

20,6 91,2

28,1 +58,4

62,8 -6,7

7,5 14,9

10,5 56,5

7,6 92,7

4,4 84,6

3,9 72,2

52,2 +57,3

49,4 -20,5

13,5 100,0

23,6 100,0

25,2 99,6

18,1 98,9

16,7 97,1

123,7 -2,9

66,3 -5,5

, % 64,6 69,2 76,8 80,4 81,1 +16,5 +4,3

: * [9;10]; ** – , . ; *** – , %.

? ,

, 1, : ,

. . , ,

1990 . 67,2% –

32,8% , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

154

2000 ., – 90%

. 2

1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . %

1990 . 2000 .

, .

: 216,3 134,8 105,3 124,0 165,1 76,3 156,8

, . 0,9 0,5 0,3 0,5 0,4 44,4 80,0 %

0,4 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,2 -0,2 -0,2

, 123 47 21 14 12 9,8 57,1

, 2,1 1,8 2,4 2,6 2,5 119,0 104,2

,

. :

169,4* 91,4**

60,0 74,8

11,0 94,3

14,1 109,9

62,2 95,0

40,8 103,9

629,1 100,7

, . 0,6 0,3

0,2 0,3

0,0 0,3

0,0 0,5

0,0 0,4

0,0 133,3

0,0 133,3

%

0,4 0,3

0,3 0,4

0,0 0,3

0,0 0,5

0,0 0,4

-0,4 +0,1

0,0 0,1

, 112 11

26 21

0 21

1 13

2 10

1,8 90,9

- 47,6

,

2,2 1,8

1,8 1,9

0,8 2,7

1,3 2,8

1,1 2,5

91,7 138,9

137,5 92,6

: * – ;

** – .

,

, . , , 2000-2010 . 92,7 –

72,2% . , . ,

, : ,

. ,

. .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

155

,

( . 2). .

. ,

. ,

. , : « . . .

. , , , , [11, . 532]. – . ,

, . , , , ; – , , , , .» [11, .

541]. ,

. 3

1990 . 1995 . 2000 . 2005 . 2010 . 2010 . % 1990 . 2000 .

100

, 94 67 49 61 43 45,7 87,8

100 , 9,8 3,4 0,1 0,3 0,7 7,1 70,0

-, %:

-32,5 -12,6 -70,6 -46,9 -45,6 -13,1 -25,0

-25,4 -58,4 -100,0 0,0 - - -

. ,

, . , 2010 .

2 1,1 , : 10 2,5 .

, ,

. : « – ».

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

156

, .

3 , 1990 . , 2010 . . ,

. , – 43

, : « 1-2, » [12, . 412]. .

,

, . , .

, -

, , . ,

.

. :

- ,

.

( . 1); - 1990 – 2010 .

,

– – ( . 2); -

, 2010 . 8,5% ,

, .

, , , ,

; - ,

, « ».

, .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

157

1. . / .

// . - 3. – . 37-41. 2. . / . // .

– 2005. - 4. – . 46-52. 3. .

/ . , . . // . – 2005. - 5. – . 45-49.

4. . / . // . – 2010. – 5. – .17-21.

5. / . // : , 29. –

: , 1998. – 252 . 6. .

/ . ,

. , . , . . – .: , 2002 – 49 .

7. . / . // : . . – 2007. – 2 (140). – . 32-34.

8. . / . // . – 2011. – 7

(26) – . 184-191. 9. 2005 . / . . – , 2006. – 157 . 10. . / . .

. . – , 2011. – 174 . 11. . .6. – .:

, 1961. – 576 . 12. . .2. – .:

, 1960. – 576 .

Summary Shulskyy M.G., Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Biotechnologies

DEVELOPMENT OF BREEDING SHEEP AND GOATS STATUS IS IN ECONOMIC FORMING OF LVIV REGION

Development of sheep-breeding and goats industries of stock-raising status is investigational in the different forms of menage Lviv Region. Offer certain measures are in relation to the improvement of conduct of these industries.

– .- ., , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

158

HUMANITARIAN EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOL

378.14:379.83 ., . ©

. .

- , . - , -

, , . ,

. , ,

. , ,

. - ,

. ,

, .

, .

,

, , ( 1 „

"). -

. , ,

, .

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

159

- , ,

, .

: , , , ,

, - , , . -

- , ,

, , .

.

. - , ,

. ,

, , .

, .

, , , , ,

, , . , :

, , , , .

? ,

. , , ?

, .

- ( , , , .). ,

. „ !", - „ ,

, , !". , ,

. ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

160

, - , . , , ,

, , , ,

, , , .

, .

, , , ,

, : , ,

, , , .

, . , ,

, . ,

, , ,

. , (

) , , . , ,

, , , - ,

. - .

, , 57, - 63 , ,

, , , , , . 10-15 .

. , . 15

5 . . 6 , , 1 2005

46 988 . 212 . ,

- 3 , - 2,4 , - 30%, 670 . .

.

, 1989 3-5 , 2005 ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

161

, 18 , - 26. , 15

.

, ; , , ,

. .

- , , ,

, , , .

,

. . ,

, , , , .

– . ,

, . , , ,

. 1. 10-12 2.

, , ,

. 3.

. .

4. .

, . ,

, , , , ,

. , .

, .

18-28 , , 16-18

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

162

. . ,

. , .

, . , ,

, , , , , .

, , , . ,

, , , . ,

.

.

, .

, ,

. , ,

, . .

- . ,

. .

: ,

. , , .

1-2 ; 2—3 4—6 .

15-20 .

, , , ,

, , . 7 5 .

1-1,5 . .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

163

1. .

// . .2. .,1969.

2. ., . , , : 1993.

3. ., ., ., . : . – :

, 2005. 4. . . –

.: , 1985. 5. . .

.: , 1992. 6. ., ., .

: . .143-147. 7. .

8-17 : . . – .6. – .: , 1966.- .143-

147. 8. .

.// .-1967, 2.- .26-30.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

164

801.82:811.111(73).42 ., ©

. ,

. .

: , , , , , .

. , , ,

, . ,

. ,

, , , [ 2, 38 ].

, ,

. , . ,

, ,

, , -

[5, 70-71 ].

.

: . ,

. , . , . , , . , , .

.

, , © ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

165

„ ”, .

, , , , . . – ,

, ,

. ,

, ,

, , , [ 6, 413].

, – , . ,

( ) ,

. , , .

, .

, ,

, ( ) , - " (ways of people ), , ,

. , , , , ,

, . , , , ,

(sames ) (differences), [7, 2-4].

, . , , , , ,

– , , , , . e

, , [3,

65-69]. " "

. , , , , ,

, ,

. , ,

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

166

, „ ” „

”). ,

, ,

. , ,

,

,

, , : , , ,

, .

: 1) , ; 2)

, ; 3) ; 4) ,

. ,

[9, 7-13]. ,

. , , . ,

, : ,

,

, .

, , . ,

, , .

1. , . 2. .

, .

1. : , , , , ?

2. , , , , , , ,

, , , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

167

.

, .

: – .

? .

; (

), , .

, ,

[ 4, 27-32].

. , ,

.

, . ,

, . . 1. –

. „ ” : ) ; ) ; ) [ 1, 27-29].

,

. , , ,

. ( ,

, ,

, ) .

, , , , ,

, . .

, , , , .

, [8, 29-30].

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

168

.

, ,

. , .

1. .

.// - 2.- .,2003.- .27-29. 2. .

// .- 4.- ., 1996.- . 38-39. 3. . . – .: , 1999.- . 65-69. 4. . -

// .- 1.- ., 2001.- . 27-32. 5. . //

.: , 1999. – . 70-71. 6. . – :

.- .: , 1990.- . 413. 7. .

// . - 26 (108).- . 2005. – . 2 -4.

8. . . //

. - 1. – ., 2004. – . 29-30. 9. // .

. – ., 1997. – . 1(3). – . 7-13. 10. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language/ Marianne Celce –

Murcia. – Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers, 1994.- P. 52-54. 11. Cooperative Language Learning: A teacher’s reference book/ Carolyn

Kessler, Ed. – Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1992. – P. 257. 12. Misztal Mariusz. Tests in English Thematic Vocabulary. – K.: ,

1999. – . 357. Summary

The article is devoted to the exploration such factors as sociocultural texts in learning foreign language by the future economists as a part of professional education in higher educational establishments. There are explained some kinds of test-tasks that help to make study more effective. Such kind and methods of study will help the future specialist to be good informed in culture and customs of English-speaking countries, so to be good communicated.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

169

: 631; 331. 4 ., ., , ., ., ,

., ., ., ., ©

. .

,

.

: ( ) – , , , OHSAS 18001,

.

, .

.

. ( ) –

,

, . , ,

– .

, ,

. :

( ) ,

. ,

( ).

, , , , , .

: - ;

© ., ., ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

170

- ; - , ; - ; - .

: -

; - ,

, ; - ; -

; - ; -

; - ; -

100%- ( ).

, .

, , ,

. ,

.

, .

, , . ,

10 2,4 , , 37%.

,

70- .

, 80%)

, 1991 , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

171

. 78%

, .

41% ,

, 23% ( ) , 36,7% .

, ,

, , ,

, . ,

OHSAS 18001 « », 1999 ,

,

. , , ,

). :

. – . – ,

. , ,

, .

: - ; - ; - ; - ; - .

, , , :

- .

. , .

: « ».

, , , ; ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

172

; , . ,

, ( ).

« » ;

- . ,

. , . ,

: ; ; ,

. , ,

, .

, , ( ,

). ;

- . « , » : «

: ». .

; - .

. , , ,

. . – ,

. :

, , , , , .

1. . . – – ,

2002 – 320 . 2. . « »

. « »: . - 1, - 2009 16. 3. WWW. OHORONAPRACI. KIEV. UA, «

», - « »: . - 2, - 2011 . 3.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

173

4. www. hwbiot. harod. ru/. . . 2011. 5. www. hbuv. gov. ua/ …41…/57. pdf .

« » 2011.

Summary PROBLEM QUESTIONS OF OPERATING CONTROL SYSTEM BY THE

GUARD OF LABOUR. It is shown that problem questions that arise up during organization of

control system by the guard of labour related first of all to imperfection of current legislation.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

174

323 ., , ©

. .

. " "

:

,

- . , XXI .,

— , , . , , ,

, . . -

– . , , , .

.

.

[5] .

, [4].

.

. , , .

« », « », [3, .5].

. — ,

, « », , , , [2, . 89-90].

, .

, , », « ». ,

.

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

175

, .

, .

, , 105/2007 «

» [5] « » [1]. ,

, . ,

, ,

. , .

, ,

. , ,

, , .

, » [4]. : ;

, ; ;

; ; .

, , ,

, ,

. 2007

, ,

, 2010-2014 « , ,

». (

, ,

, ,

, , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

176

), , (

) . - «

» ( ) .

, , , . :

, , ;

, ;

, ,

, ; ,

;

, , ;

, , ;

, ; « » ,

; , , ,

, , , ,

, ; , ,

, , , , ,

.

: , ,

; , ;

, , ;

, , ,

; ,

, , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

177

, ; ,

; ; ;

.

. :

; 2010-2014 « ,

, »;

, , , ).

:

, ,

, , ,

, , .

,

. ,

, ,

, .

. 2011 ) – -

, ,

, ,

,

; 2012 . ,

, . (2012-2014 ) - 2010-2014 « , ,

», ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

178

( 2015 ) .

,

. , , ,

, , , , ,

. ,

, ,

, .

, , , .

. : , ;

, , ,

; , .

, ,

.

1. « » / . : (http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=964-15).

2. . . , , / , . . // . — 2003. — 8. — . 89—90

3. // . . — 3 (53). —

.: , 2004. — 185 . 4. .

/ . : http://www.niss.gov.ua/ content/ articles/files /proj ect-Litvinenko-dccO 8 .pdf

105/2007 « » / . : http://www.president.

gov.ua/documents/5728.html

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

179

., ©

.

. , , .

, .

: , , , , .

.

, . , , . , ,

.

, . , ,

, . — , 2

: , , ( ). ,

, . ,

. . “ –

, . – , ,

– .” (4, . 19). .

, – ,

. ( . 1) ,

, – . .

“ – , . ”(2, . 7)

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

180

1. ,

, . ,

, , . –

, . “ ” . ,

, , —“ ".

, , , .

, . (revenue - profit), (to

buy – to sell), (manage – manager ). ,

. , .

. , , . , .

. , . ,

, . ,

, , , .

– , , . ,

. “ , , ,

” (1, .251). ,

. , ,

: ., ., ., . – ,

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

181

, , . ,

, : hammer, gap, debt, agency , advice. , , ,

. – , .

, .( . 2) , .

. 2. ,

) , . , ,

, . , – ,

. , .

– , ,

( ), .

, .

,

. ,

. income, (income – money that you earn from

your job or that you receive from investment). money that you earn from you job receive from investments,

. .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

182

. 3. income

, income 1) 2 : money that you earn from you job receive

from investments. 2) 4 2 : money that you earn , job, receive, investments 2 3 : money, earn.

– - , ,

. .

, , ,

. , .

.

, – , . ,

. ,

. . ,

, .

1.

. – . , 1974. – 367 . 2. . . . – .

, 1977. – 167 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

183

3. . . – . ,1974. – 201 . 4. . // , 1970. - 1 - .

19-32. Summary

This article investigates term and its main linguistic features. Such phenomena as term field and system and correlation between term, concept and meaning are shown. The method of net modeling and its practical application was paid attention to.

Key words: term, system, meaning, concept, net modeling, decomposition.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

184

35.073.6 ., ©

« »

(1917-1991 .)

,

. : , ,

, , , , .

.

. , ,

. .

, ,

, , , .

. .

, ,

, . ,

. , . , . , . , . .

1917 . 1991 .

.

. ,

, , ,

, .

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

185

, ,

. ,

, , , –

. , .

.

1917 . . 1917

1910 . 14 1924 .

– , 283 .

,

, , [1, . 96].

1924 . :

; –

; ; – .

.

20-

. 1922 1928 . , ,

, . 19 1928

, 36 [4, .1]. ,

1924 ., , ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

186

20- -30

. ) 1930 .

. .

, .

5 1964 .

, , -

. " " " ",

, , .

1964 ,

.

1928 . 1964 ,

. ,

.

27 1981 . [2, . 101].

,

9 1982 . 1985 .

. " ".

, 12 1986 .

, , ,

. , ,

, V

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

187

1986 1991 . .

. , .

. .

. 90-

, , , ,

. 16 1990 .

, , ,

. 1990

( 26 1990 . 601-XII),

( 25 1991 . 996- ).

.

26 1991 . [3]. ,

: – – .

. .

, . 1 “ ” : ”

.

”.

. .

11 1991 1

– .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

188

12 1991 .

. . , ,

. .

.

« », .

.

. , , , ,

. ,

, , , .

1. . / .

// , 1987. – . 96. 2. . – 1981 .– 17. – . 101. 3. . – 19 1991. – 93. 4. , 1929. – 1. – . 1.

Summary For centuries custom has been one of the most essential factors of statehood

and independence, striking evidence of the power and financial sovereignty.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

189

168.522.000:372.8:811.124:378.4 . ., ©

.

. : , , , , ,

.

, , ,

, , , , .

, ,

, .

, , ,

. ,

– , , , , , , , ,

). –

. , , , , ,

, , . , , , ,

, .

, , , ,

.

© . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

190

, .

. , ,

. . .

, , ,

.

VIII . . , , ,

. VIII . ,

, . VII – VIII .

-: , , , , .

, ”, ” ” .

. , ,

, , , . . [1, c.

412], :” , ”. ,

. , XIX – XX ., ,

, , , , , ,

, , . , , . , “ ” [1, c. 399],

, .

, , .

, , . ,

, . , ,

” , , .

. : “

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

191

, . , , ,

, ” [3, c. 97].

: , . ( ) – ( .

Autem cultura animi philosophia), , , , ,

. , [4, . 6],

.

. ,

( , , , , , , , ).

. , , , ,

. ,

, , , , .

. – ,

.

, , . XVIII . (1651 – 1715) : “

… , ” [5, c. 157]. . – ,

, . ,

, “ ” , ,

. , , , .

: “ – , ”. , , .

.

90- . – , ,

. , , [6, c. 3], ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

192

, . ,

, , . , ,

. , ,

, , , . . ,

. , ,

, , , “ ”. ,

. – ,

, . : “Amicus Plato, sed magis

amica veritas” (“ – , ”).

. ,

. “ ” : “

, , …”[2, c. 203].

– ,

, , ,

. : 1) ; 2)

; 3) ; 4) ( -).

,

. , ratio ( ), cultura ( ), spiritus ( ), usus

), processus ( ) . ,

.

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

193

.

, , –

.

1. . : 2- . – : , 1973.

2. . . // . . . . – ., 2000. 3. . . . –

: , 2003. 4. .

XVI – XVIII ./ . . . . . . – .: . , 1999. – 104 .

5. . – : , 2001. 6. . . – .: , 2001.

Summary

This article is devoted to the inexhaustible humanitarian potential of the Latin course as a good basis for a progressive change in the spiritual life of the university education.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

194

631.3 : 681.3 ., , ,

., , ©

.

,

.

: , ,

, , .

. , ,

,

.

, .

. ,

, , ,

[1]. ,

.

, , [2]. ,

, ,

[3]. .

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

195

, .

. :

( ), , .

. ( ) .

, , . ,

. .

.1. – , , ( =0)

, , , ( ).

.1.

,

. .2 .

( . .2).

,

.

?

= = 0

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

196

.

.

.2. .

; (« », « »),

.

. , .

, , : = 1 + 2 + 3,

1, 2, 3 – , ,

, , .

1-

?

= = 0

2-

?

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

197

, :

1 = 11 + 12 + … + 1n1 ;

2 = 21 + 22 + … + 2n2;,

3 = 31 + 32 + … + 3n3 , j – ,

( = 1,2,3); j – ; n1, n2, n3 – , ,

.

Visual Basic – 6. , .

,

( . . 3).

. 3. .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

198

, . ,

, . , ,

( . . 4).

. 4. -

.

, ( . . 5). ,

, , .

( . . 5); ,

; .

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

199

. 5.

. ,

,

1. ., ., .

. – .: « », 1998. – 115 . 2.

: / . . – .: , 1992. – 144 .

3. «

»: / . , . , . , . . – , 2009. – 112 .

Summary

Kozij B.I., Drach M.P. Computer system of professional students training level valuation on

clinical diagnosis of animals diseases Computer system of students knowledge control is proposed with the help of using test tasks of many levels, which simulate the process of veterinary doctor decision during the diagnosis of animals diseases. The system also provides for training possibility of students during self-reliant work. Key words: educational process, veterinary medicine, knowledge control< computer, information system.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

200

111:504.7 . ., , ©

. ., ,

. . .

:

– , ,

’ ,

. :

, , .

, , .

.

– , .

, .

. .

, , , , .

,

.

, . .

, – .

. “ ” ,

. ,

.

© . ., . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

201

“ ”

, , , , .

,

, - .

,

, .

.

. , , , ,

, .

. ,

, , , .

, – . ,

, ,

, . .

, .

, .

, , , , .

, , , .

. ,

. ,

,

, ). ,

, .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

202

,

. .

, , , . , . , .

. –

, .

.. . , .

, .

, . .

.

.

. .

.

. . ,

, .

, . . :

( - ), (paradeigma- ; ), (cluster-

), , . ,

; , . ,

, .

, , . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

203

, .

, , : ; , ,

; ;

; ; ; ;

. , .

: – . ,

.

1. . . , . , . . : . .- : , 2005.

2. . . : .- .: , 1997 ,-271 .

3. . . . . V

/ . . . – .: ,2004.-418 . 4. . , . . , . , . . :

. . – ,2003.-334 .

Summary Kostenko V. G., Fedyshyn Y. I.

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj

PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE: DIALECTICS OF THE CORRELATION AND INTERDEPENDENCE .

Science philosophy searches science as special form of spiritual activity of the society.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

204

111:504.7 . ., , , ©

. ., ,

. . .

“ ”

( ) , , .

: , , , , .

– . ,

. . ?

? , ? ? ?

? ? ?

? , , ?

( ) …. , .

“ – , ,

, , , ”. “ , ,

, ” , . ,

. . ,

.

. .

. , : -

, -, , .

, , , ,

© . ., . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

205

”.

. “

. “ , , , ,

”. , , .

, ,

, . ,

: “ ? C

. “ ” . ,

. - .

.

, . ,

. ,

,

(“… , .”). ,

, .

, .

, , . . , ,

, , , . , ,

. : “ -

, , , - .”

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

206

, , .

. . , .

“ ” , , . .

– . .

. – .

- , - . , -

, – , . ,

.

: , , , , , , ,

, ( , .), , .

. . ,

. , “

“. – . .

, .

. ,

, . – .

, . ,

. .

: =

, , .

. . : , , , .

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

207

, , , .

. . ?

? , . .

- . , , .

, ” ” ( ). : .

, . .

, : . , , – , ,

“ ”, - ,

. , , , ,

– , .

1. . ., .3, .,1981, .136-137. 2. Prigogine I.The Philosophy of Instability.Futures.August,1989, p.397.

Summary The article is dedicated to articulation question about nature and essence of

substance.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

208

: 291.8 ., ©

: , .

: , , , , , .

, , , -

. , , , , « »

, « – », « » . , « »

. , [1, 2]

– , , , , ,

[ .: . 2, 7; 6, 3; . 27, 50; . 8, 9; . 2, 11; 2, . 130]. « » ,

, , , [3].

, – . ,

, : – – [4].

( ), , .

( ), , , (s ma, psych , nous), , ,

[4]. , , ,

, : .

, . , , ,

: « , » (2 . 1, 4).

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

209

. « » (…) [2, . 124].

, , , , .

, ,

, (nephes) (ruah) , , , ,

: – « », ; – », ; , « » ,

. ( , ) .

, [4].

, [ . 1, 26].

[5] , « » :

1) , ;

2) , ( . 2);

3) , , ;

4) , , ;

5) , « », ( . 2);

6) . , , , ,

: « , – , , » [ . 19, 2]. , ,

, , : « , » [ . 5, 48].

, ,

. , , , , .

, , .

, , , .

. , , [ .: . 16, 13] , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

210

, . , , . ,

, , ,

. [ . 5, 9], - « »! [ . 20, 19], –

. , , : «

» [ . 15, 33]. , ,

, : « – , – . , , –

. » [ . 15, 5]. : « ,

, - » [ . 15, 8]. , , ,

, , . , , , , ,

? , : « (…)» [ . 6, 9].

: « : (…)» [ .

3, 16].

, - , , , ,

. , : « ,

; » [ . 1, 15]. ,

. , , ,

[5]. ,

: « ; , , » [ . 11, 12].

, ? , , –

: « , , (…)» [ . 11, 25]. : « , , ,

, , » [ . 11, 27]. , : « ,

» [ . 11, 28].

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

211

! !

: « , ,

. » [ . 11, 29-30]. ,

, ,

[5]. , , , – . , ,

[5].

. « » 11

2008 , « », ,

, ,

, , . , ,

, – , [5].

2011 « – »,

: , .

. , .

, [2, . 704].

. , ,

[2, . 8]. , , , ,

[1, 2]. , .

, , ,

. . «

», ( .: . 13, 33) [2, . 705].

, (…)

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

212

, [2, . 708].

.

, . [2, .746].

, , : « , », ,

, [2, . 313]. , , ,

, . – . ,

. – , (…).

, [2, . 710]. .

, – , – , [2,

. 711]. ,

. , , ( )

.

) . , , . , ,

. , , , , . – , .

. 1.

– , .

2. ;

, , ,

. 3. ,

, .

4. .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

213

5. [ .: . 1, 16-17; 2, . 46], ( ) [2, . 771]

.

1. / – . , 3- . -« », 2007.

2. : – . – : , 2011. -336 .

3. . . . . . . , . – : , 2010. -992 .

4. ., . / . . , . – : , 2006. -144 .

5. / / . . , , , . – : , 2012. – 200 .

Summary

Krupnyk Ya.G. Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies

named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN BEING TO THE ADVANTAGE

OF CHURCH DOGMA Based on Church dogma about human being and its spiritual life, the main

aspects of spiritual development of human: spiritual, scientific and practical are observed.

Key words: God, Jesus Christ, Spirit Saint, Church, human, spiritual development.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

214

658:631.3:619 ., ., ., . ©

, , ,

– – .

: , , , , , .

, ,

, .

: – ; – ; – ; – ,

. :

– , ; – ; – .

? , ,

.

. – ,

, . , , ,

. – ,

© ., ., ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

215

.

. , , , , ,

.

: – ; – , ; – ; – ; – , ; – ; – ; – ; – ; – .

. ,

– . , ,

, .

, .

. – –

, : – ; – , , ; – ; – ; – .

, , , .

, – – . ,

, . ,

. . , ,

. ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

216

, , , .

.

, , : , , , , , –

, , . , .

– . , – . ,

. , ,

. – .

, , , , ,

, . ,

. – ( ,

, , , , , , ). ,

, , .

, ,

, , ,

. ,

, , .

: – ; – ( ); – ; – , ( ); – ; – ; – , .

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

217

, , .

1. .

. – ., 2006. – 311 . 2. . . – .: , 2000. –

112 . 3. / ., .,

. – .: , 2005. – 440 . 4. . : . . – . – ., 2002. – 223 . 5. .

: . . – : . , 1991. – 224 .

Summary The article lucidly revealed important side of marketing, as a special area of

economics that deals with sales of veterinary appointment, the role of incentives and motivation, the most common and mandatory aspects of contacts and cooperation between customers - pet owners and service providers - implement it products.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

218

808.51:81’373.7 ., . ©

.

, ,

. : , ,

, , .

. - , , , , , , .

, , : . ,

, , . ,

, , , , – ,

, , . , ,

, , , , , ,

, . , , , ,

, .

, , ,

, V : ,

( ) , ,

. ,

, , .

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

219

, . : , , , . .

. ,

; , : -, -, -, -, : , , , , , .

: , - , - , - , - . : , , , , ,

, , . ,

, : – , : , , , , ; – : ,

; – , , ; , : , , .

, ,

. , , , , .

, , , , ,

- , .

, , , . , «

, , » [6, 10].

, , , .

, , .

– . ,

, , , , , .

, . « » «

», « », « », « », « », « », « », « » . . –

. – , , .

, , , .

, , –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

220

. – , , .

. , –

, , . , « » - « », «

» », « » « »;

, » - « »; « , » - « »; » -

» . ,

, , , , .

-,

, . , « » « », « »-

», « »-« »,» »-« »,»

»-« ». . : «

, , . , , , ,

, . , » [ .

9, 60]. , ,

, , , . , ,

, , . – , .

– , » [1, 28].

. « , ,

, ,

».

, , , ,

; ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

221

; . .

.: – ; , ;

; – . . . ,

.

, , . ,

“ ”, ;” ”, , ” .

: -

; - ; ; - ; - ;

- ; - ; - .

:

- ; , .

, , -

: , – , , , –

, . - ,

, ,

. , , , ,

; ; – ;

. .

,

, : ; ; ; ; ; , ;

; . . . , : ), ),

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

222

( ), ( ), ( ), ( .

, , .

: ) ; , ; ; ; ) , :

; ; ) ; : ; ; ) , : ; ; .

: ; ; .

, : “ ”, “

”,” ”, ”, “ ” .

. , ” ”. .

, , , ,

- , .

, , , « 12» ( ): , .

[4,42] - , ; :

[4,82, 85]. -

, - , :

, (« ») [10, , 321] ; , ( ) [10, , 324];

(« ») [10, , 223]; , , («

..») [10, , 351].

, , ,

– .

1. . . . . - , 1982.

2. . . – . , 1997, 11-12, . 26-29.

3. . . , 1997, 5-6, . 21.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

223

4. . . : 1983. 5. . . .

, 1997, 1, . 8-13. 6. . . . : ,

1988. 7. . .

, 1981, 9, . 60-63. 8. . .1-111. : 1963.

Summary Researches deals with the new and interesting from the point of view of lexicology

problem of the role of phraseological units of Bible origin in the art of oral speaking.The article describes wide usage of words with prefixes and suffixes of old Slavonic origin.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

224

: 329:339 321:011. 5 . ., , . ., ©

.

1929-39 .

,

. .

: , , .

,

. :

, , . , . , . , . 1929

. , . .

[6]

, , [6].

, .

[7]. , 1917-23 .,

[3]. , , ,

. , . , ,

,

© . ., . ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

225

: , , – [1].

, .

5 1929 . . , 1- .

, . , -

, ,

, . . , –

– ,

. .

, ,

. , 1- , 14- 1929 . .

1- [4]. ,

.

. . ,

, . [8].

, ,

.

-

, , 1917-23 . .

, . .

, ,

, . ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

226

.

, ,

. , . ,

: – – .

,

,

.

. . ( ( )) [5].

, . . ,

, , [6].

, , ,

.

, ,

[2]. ,

.

. . ,

, . , ,

. 1-

, , , , , -

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

227

1. . // : ( ). ., 1996 360 . 2. , - 1974 . 210 3. . // . . . 1. , 2001. 348 . 4. . . 1940 .. 260 . 5. , 1994 601 . 6. « » 1, 1968 .

505 . 7. . 1929-1939 ,

2010 210 . 8. . ,

, 2005. . 22

Summary Paranyak P.R., Kostenko V.G.

This article analysis question of employee Organization ukrainian nationalists with democracy countries in Europe and America. This question is very actual today because OUN was illegal organization, and their main task was regeneration independence Ukrainian state and returning ethnic regions. Development this question will help to solve immemorial conflict between Poland and Ukraine.

Key words: Versailles-Washingtonian system of agreements, Advice of of the Entente, pacification.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

228

341.43:94(477)„192” ., . . ., ©

„ ”

20- . .

20- . .

, . ,

. : , ,

, .

. 20-30- .

. ,

. , ,

.

, .

,

, .

,

.

20- , .

. ,

, „ ” .

, .

, , : ,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

229

. , ,

. . . ,

: , , , . 1991 :

, , ,

, . ,

20- . . .

. 1915 ,

,

- [10, .. 10].

,

. [11, . 14]. ,

, , , 20- .

20- . , ,

. , ,

. ,

„ ”, „ ”, „ ”, „ ”, ”.

. . „ , ,

, : , , ”[1, .462]. ,

, . ,

. , ,

( ). 23 1920 . „

”. , 4 1921 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

230

, , . .

„ …

”[3, .72]. , , .

,

, , ,

1919 . 91- -

, 10 1919 . -, , , ,

[5, . 49]. 30 1921 .

. „ ”. , ,

, , [5, .58].

, .

, ”. „ ”, . .

„ ”.

1867 . 1922 350 , 290 [6, . 1].

, „ ” : , . ( 30 )

, 20 [6, . 2].

„ ” , . ,

. , , . , . [2, . 127]. ,

, .

, 1919 .

[8, . 3]. , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

231

.

, . , 1921-1922 . 13 ,

[4, . 44]. , 1920-1922 . „ ”,

.

. ,

, . , . ,

. , . ,

, .

.

” . [9, . 267]. 1922 . .

1921-1922 . .

1 1921 „ ”

. , , .

, , -, -

. 1922 .

. , . 1923 . .

. , ,

[9, . 285]. ,

, , , , . -

.

. , . , . .

.

. . 1921

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

232

, 17 [6,

. 11]. ,

. , .

. , , 1921 . 315 .

, . , 12 3

, . , . , . , . , . , . [7, . 100].

, .

. ,

.

, .

. ,

. , ,

. ( 1945 .).

1922-1925 . .

, , , . ,

4 . , .

,

. ,

. , 30-

. . ,

, .

, , . , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

233

, . ,

, . ,

, , , . , ,

. , .

1917-20 , ,

, . .

, , .

, , ,

, , .

. .

, .

, . -

. -

, ,

, .

1. . (1914 1920).

: . , 1969. 542 . 2. . „ ” // -

1991 : ”, 1990. 256 .

3. . , 1917-1921. .: , 2003. 607 .

4. . (1819-1991). .: , 1994. 320 .

5. . . .: „ ”, 1994. 260 .

6. ( ). . 4465, . 1, . 26.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

234

7. . . 3859, . 1, . 134. 8. . (

. ). . 1233, . 1, . 66. 9. . . . 1235, . 1, . 266. 10. . (

. ). . 399, . 1, . 1. 11. . . . 746, . 1, . 1.

Summary Plazova T.I.

Question of Ukrainian political emigration in Austria of the 20-th years XX century are explorer and analyzed. At this period the national liberation movement suffered the biggest defeat, Ukrainians warriors was forced to leave their legacy inheritance and move to the foreign country. The article analyzes strength, social status and activity of Ukrainian political emigration.

Key words: Ukrainian emigration, national liberation movement, social status, strength.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

235

378:636.611 ., ., ©

. : , , , ,

, , , , , , , .

,

. , ,

, , - , , , ,

, , . : , ,

, , , , .

, – »

.

, , .

.

.

, .

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

236

– , ,

(1).

.

. – , ,

, , , , .

, ,

(2,3).

– . ,

,

. –

,

,

, . ,

,

. - ,

, , [4].

,

.

, : , ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

237

, (5).

« »

,

.

. : , , , .

, 2006-2007 ,

, ,

.

,

: 1.

. 2.

. 3. . 4. ,

. ,

, .

, ,

. ,

, , , ,

.

: 1.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

238

2.

. 3. ,

, , , ,

.

4.

. 5.

.

: 1. . // .,

. – 2006. - 6. – . 7-13. 2. . // . – 1999. - 1. – . 3. – . 19-40.

3. . . //

, 21 2005 . – .: , 2005. – .1 – . 28-34.

4. / .: . . – .: .., 2000. – 380 .

5. . – // .,

. .- 2006, 6. – .- 38-41.

Summary Prysyazhnyuk V.Ya., kandidat of sciens veterinary, docent

Lviv national university of veterinary medicine and biotechnologies named after S.Z. Gzhytskyi/

The article lights the problem of the methodical providing of independent work of students on condition of the use of the credit-module departmental teaching, and ways of its decision, which are offered on the example of one of normative disciplines.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

239

: 903.25 . ([email protected]) ©

, ,

. . -.

.

,

, , . , ,

.

: . , : . ) ,

[10, . 1].

. :

1: . -

II [11, . 203]. .

[6, . 53]. . 14

. 17 .

19 , . 24 ,

, . 29 , .

.

, . II – . III . . ,

, I – II . . [14, s. 56] , , ,

. , ,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

240

I – II . [3, . 359], . ,

. ,

, [8, . 153]. , ,

, .

2: . , .

[6, 54]. , 3, 5, 6, 28, 42 ,

, .

.

. II – . III . .. ,

. II – III . . , , V . .

,

. ,

, . 3: .

D . 24.

. , , ,

, [14, s. 76]. , .

I II . . ,

, . ,

, . , [9, . 27].

, . .

. 8 , – 6,5 . [6, . 54].

( . 61), – ( . 29).

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

241

, . , .

.

, [14, s. 66]. [13, s. 60] .

, ,

. ,

. , . . II – . . III . .

. , , .

. ( 5-6) , .

, . , ,

. .

. 1: .

. . . .

, , , , , .

. ,

. , .

. , . , .

, . ,

. , , , .

. ,

[6, . 19]. ,

– [5, . 105].

, [2, . 174].

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

242

.

, , . . III . . .

, III . . .

. , I – II . ., II .

, .

II – III . . III . [1, . 121].

2: , , ,

. .

[4, . 155] [7, . 60] .

, [12, . 175].

, . , ,

8-9 5,8-7 . . 8 .

, . .

, . ,

IV . V . .

IV – . V . . IV . . .

. ,

. . ,

, , , ,

. , . ,

. , .

, .

, , . –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

243

, – . ,

.

.

1. . . .

. – , 1981. – 264 . 2. . //

. . – 116. – , 1964. – .173-175.

3. . . - , 2008. – 472 . 4. ., ., . . . – , 1999. – 128 .

5. . ., ., . ( ). – , 2004. – 235 .

6. . . – , 1980. – 130 . 7. . ( .

. ) // . – , 1975. – 18. – . 51-61. 8. . . //

. – , 1969. – 1. – . 147-159. 9. .

// . . – , 2000. – .35-36. – .13-31.

10. ., . . .

: . – . 14 – , 2011. 11. . //

. – , 2008. – . 11. – . 195- 208. 12. . : , . –

, 2005. – 592 . 13. Chmielowska A. Grzebienie staro ytne i redniowieczne z ziem

polskich.- ódz, 1971. – 160 s. 14. Thomas S. Studien zu den Germanischen Kammen der Romischen

Kaiserzeit.// Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte zur sachsischen Bodendenkmalpflege. – Leipzig, 1960. – B.8. – S.53-120.

Summary The article discusses the distribution, typological characteristics and

chronology of bone combs found on settlements and cemeteries Vielbark culture in the first half I thousand BC in Dniester- Pripjat interfluve. Briefly described value and use of combs in the then society.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

244

796.011.3 ., . ©

.. .

, .

, , ,

. , ,

, , . ,

.

. , ,

. - , , . , ,

. .

. , 2- 3-

. ,

, , .

. .

, , , .

: , , ( . ).

« ». ,

. ,

, , , .

?

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

245

- . ,

. , . ,

( ).

. , .

, . ,

. , .

. - « », « » .

. « , , ,

, », — . . . ,

. , . . ,

, , . - 8-10 .

, . 2- — 5-7 ; 2 3- — 10

; 3-5 - 15 ; 5 7-20 . - .

, . , , .

, ,

. 8-12 . « » 8 12 ,

- 8 11. , , ,

. , . , , .

, , .

, : , - ; ,

. ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

246

». « » -. , 85-90

70-75 11-12 . 21-26 18-20 . 7 9

. ,

. 11-12 ,

. .

. 8-12 .

. 8 11 , ,

. ,

, , , .

« ». , .

. , « » .

, . 100-150

. 10-15 .

( « »).

, , , .

- , , .

. ,

. , , « » -

. ,

.

: -

;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

247

- , ;

- , , ; - ; ,

; - ; - ; -

. .

). 13 16 . - 12 15.

- 11 18 , 13-14 .

. 28 (60 %), 21 (28 %), 30-35 (10-12

%). 3-6 . 28- : — 1-5 ; - 19-23;

- 24-27. , , , . ,

. ,

. .

, , , , , .

, . .

« » 12-13 , - 14-15. 90-97%

. , , .

17-18 . .

. - , , .

. . .

, .

18-20 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

248

. .

, .

, .

, . ,

: - , ,

; -

( , ); - , ,

, ; - ,

; -

; - : , ,

, , ;

- . 60 , 4 – 30-45 , 25-30 . . : - 22-35

21-35 ; - 36-60 ( .) 36-55 ( .) . .

1- (25-35 ). 21-25 - ! , , ,

, . , ... , .

. - . , 21

, . ,

, . 85%

22 46 . . ( ) 34

. 36 . .

35 1953 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

249

, , 1953

. , ,

( , ), - , , ( , , ).

, , ,

25-26 . 35 , ,

. 5. ,

. - .

36-60 . , , ,

... : , , ; , ... , , ,

. , , , . « — ,

- - ...» ? ,

. . , 86% 90-100

. , .

. : .

. ? ,

, , . ,

- , .

, , , : - ; - , (50-60 ) ; - ,

; - ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

250

- , , ,

; - ;

- , ;

- , ;

- ; - ; - ,

.

, .

1. ., .

. // ». 1985- 10- .45-47.

2. ., . . // -2990-

11- .18-21. 3. .

. //

.1992. 4. ., . .-

: , 1988. 5. ., .,

. , 1986-143 . 6. . . , 1999-

.47, 296.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

251

619(47+57)(091)”19” ., , ,

, .

1917-1921 .

1917-1921 . , .

. B

- , – .

, - .

: , , , .

.

, ,

. , ,

, .

, , . , .

, ,

. .

, . . -

. , , .

. (1914-1917 .) .

[1]. ,

, , .

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

252

. ,

, , , , , .

, [2].

,

. ,

.

, 1917 . , , , , , ,

, , , , .

1917-1918 . 500 . .

B 1920 . , , , , , , ,

, 43 635 . , - , -

, , , , , - . , 1920 .

18 [3]. 1921 . 24 , 95 3060 .

, [4].

; .

1917 . , . [5].

, .

, .

,

.

: –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

253

; – ; –

; - . , [6,7].

, , ,

. B 1918 .

,

. .

.

, ,

.

.

, 1918 . . 56 .

1918 .

. . ., ,

.

1918 . .

, , ;

,

,

". , ,

. , 1851-

1852 ., ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

254

, . 1864 .

, ,

[8]. ,

, , ,

, –

. , , ,

, , ,

, .

, ,

; ,

, ;

;

; ,

; ;

, , .

. . 1.

. .

2. ,

. , .

1. ., ., .

. . . / . . – .: », 2002. – 384 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

255

2. 1916 // . – 1916. –

1. – . 3-4. 3. . / . . – .:, 1954. –

430 . 4. . ., . . / . . –

.:, 1988. – 128 . 5.

262 27.08.1917 . // . . – .163., . 11., . 11. – . 11-12.

6. . . / . . – .:, . – 1977. – 344 .

7. . 30 1917 . // . – 1918. – .2. – .

19-21. 8. . / .

. – 1913. - 6. – . 271-286

Summary Investigated the history of development of veterinary medicine of Ukraine at the

1917-1921 years. It is set, that the World War I almost completely stopped the work of veterinary stuff. The origin of amount growth of veterinary stuff in the country by the period of the authority establishment was the complicated epizootic situation. In the described period, activity of veterinary organization was under the most important task – to eliminate the contagious disease, firstly to eliminate plague of cattle. Epizootics covered the territory of almost all Soviet Union, what made the authorities to organize the legislature of veterinary medicine – Central veterinary department of Public Commissary of internal affairs.

Key words. History aspects, veterinary medicine, epizootic, veterinary direction, veterinary department.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

256

378.1 ., , ©

.

, ! –

. , . , .

. “ ” – . , , , …

. “ ” ( )

. , . – .

: “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, ”, „ ”, “ ”, “

”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, ”, “ ”, „ : !”, “ ”, –

, , – , , ,

, . ( –

) 1 – . , , , ,

, , , – . . ! ,

. , ,

... ? , ,

? , , .

, , , ,

. : – .

, . © ., 2012

1 – . . „ ”, ,

. – .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

257

, , , . , ,

, – 2 , ,

. … , . ,

, : “ ” – . , , , .

, .

: - , , ;

- ; - .

, , ;

. – .

, . ,

, . ,

, , , . :

, . , , …

. , , : .

– , .

, ,

, , , , –

« », : .

, : . , . , ,

. :

2 „ ”, „ ”, „ ”,

”, „ ”, – . – .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

258

, ,

.

– , , , ,

, , , .

, , , :

, , – , . ,

, , , ,

; ( ) ,

, , – .

.

, , ,

, ( , ) ( , ,

, ), , , , , – . , , aprior

. : ,

. , , , , , –

, , . ,

, .

: ,

– , . ,

.

, , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

259

: . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –

398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).

Summary

V.M.Tyshchenko Lviv National Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj

PHENOMENON OF PROFESSION Quite a bit specialists work on the departments of the Ukrainian institutes of

higher, whose work is marked deep knowledge of object, organic internal unity, ponderable argumentation, brightness and penetrating. Will mark: such teachers there will be majority, and exactly they determine the state of domestic institute of higher studies on the whole. But is, unfortunately, and opposite cases.

Against failures nobody is insured. In the profession of teacher, as well as in any other, appropriate successes and failures : it is dialectics of human activity as such. Distresses other - when noticeable successes during great while are not quite, and expectation of them acquires utopian character gradually.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

260

378.1 ., , ©

.

:

,

, . .

, , .

, – , , .

, , , , . . (

) – , . .

... , , .

, .

,

. , ,

. , , ,

, verbo, .

.

, , , , , – (

) , . – -IV .

. , ,

. . – .

. , , .

, . ,

© ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

261

. , .

, , , ;

, , – .

– , , , .

, , , ,

, , , –

,

. , , .

, .

, . .

: . ,

, . , ,

. . ( ) ,

, .

, , ,

. , , ( – ) ,

, . , ,

– “ -”, ,

. , ,

. , , – ,

. , , , .

, . , ,

, . :

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

262

. , ,

. – . ,

. : .

. ( , ,

) , .

( , ) – . , ,

. , .

. – . , ,

. , ,

. .

, ,

, , : . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –

398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).

Summary

V.M.Tyshchenko Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies

named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj TEACHING At HIGHER SCHOOL: DIALECTICAL ASPECT

Listeners perceive Word. A word - a sound only. But a sound is this unique. He contains maintenance the volume of which is determined only in each, to the separately taken case. The professionals of institute of higher department try to avoid diffuse concepts, and that is why go an associative verbal row. Possibly, doing it historians more easily. More easily to create in an audience a verbal picture the bright strokes of which sometimes give almost physical reality to the events. Most teachers of historical disciplines are able not only to tell about the past but also show with the help of His Majesty of Word of epoch, event, people; enter present young people in the mysterious remoteness of centuries, to pass in verbal paints that which must not forever drip in - the ominous underground river of oblivion.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

263

378.1 ., , ©

.

: ,

– , , , ... .

. , , , –

? , – : ,

– . , , – , , .

, „ ”. . ,

, . , , .

, , .

, .

– . , ,

. 3

: “ ” – . .

, , . .

... – , . , ...

, !

, , , :

! , , …

: , , , ,

!

© ., 2012 3 . .: . .

. . – : , 2005. – . 69-72.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

264

! ,

;

. ,

, ... , ?

! . :

– .

, , , , . , , .

, , . , , , „ ”

, , .

, , , ,

. ,

. , , ,

, – ( !) . ,

, .

,4

. , ,

.

, .

, ,

: ,

, . ,

. . ,

, .

, , ...

, , – .

, .

,

, –

, , , . – , ,

... , !

– .

4 . . :

. – , 1990. – . 12,13. . .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

265

*** – ,

.

. ,

.

. ,

, ,

.

, , .

, .

, , .

– .

, – ,

.

...5

, ,

, – . ,

. ,

– . ,

– ? ? ?

– ! ,

. ,

.

...

, – ,

: .

. “ ” –

. :

, , ? ,

. ,

. –

.

, . , , ,

, .

. , , . ,

. : „ !

!” , , „ ” , – , , .

, . , , ,

( , ) , .

5 . – . – : , 1992. – . 146.

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

266

, . ,

. , , ,

, .

. .

, , , , ,

. , ,

-.

, , , , – – .

.

, , , ,

: . . – : , 2002. – 342 .; . : . – : , 2006. –

398 . : . . – : , 2009. – 320 . ( ).

Summary V.M.Tyshchenko

Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S.Z.Gzhytskyj

AUXILIARY LITERARY EXERCISES AS METHOD OF IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LANGUAGE

Will specify at once: the article does not contain asseveration, that the teachers of Institutes of higher for the improvement of writing word need necessarily mother of skill in especially literary genres - publicism, translations, prose, poetries.. Will count it by the matter of free choice.

But there is information for reflections. Own translations, own poetic search, own publicism materials, - or will name them superfluous for our professional arsenal? Probably, - vice versa: the additional linguistic enriching will be useful for a specialist the basic working instrument of which is exactly a language - verbal and writing. The last requires a high-quality technique, and, - permanent, scalene training, including on the especially literary field.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

267

141. 7. ., ,

, © ., .

,

. , 1)

“ ” ( ), 2) ( “ ”) 3)

(“ ” “ ” ). ,

, .

: , - ( “ ” “ ”), ,

( ) , ,

) . .

. : , , ,

, ( ) ,

, .

( )

, ( . .) ( .

.) [9, 455].

. , , -

, . . [7].

1974 ., ,

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

268

1977 ., (“ ”,

), 1982 ., ( )

1989 ., , – 1994 .,

[7], – , . .,

, [10, 283-285].

( , 1858 ., 1913 ., . 1921 ., . 2003 .

.) . . “ ”: “ ” ( , , , , . ,

, , .), ( – -

– – . 1974 . – 1976, 1979 .), . .

1977 .) , , , , , , , ,

“ ” ., , ( ,

.), ( .), ( , ,

, , , , , , , , , , .),

. . .- , ,

, , , , , ( 1994 .) . [10, 283-285],

, 1) ” ( ), 2) ( ) –

( “ ”) 3) (“ ” “ ” ) [10, 284].

( – , ) ( ,

, , .) ( , , , “ ”)

, 1993 . . (

), ( ) – [7; 10, 284].

1960-1980- .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

269

( ) [9, 456], , , ,

, , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , .

. , , ,

-

, “ ”, , “ ” ,

-.

( , 1992 .), -

( , 1985 .), ( , 1983 .),

, , ( , 1991 .),

( , 1992 .), , ,

( , 1985 .), ( , 1983 .), : , , , ,

, 1992 .), , 1991 .) , , ( “

” 1983 . ) “ ” [4, 182]. , , , “

… ” [4, 192], : “ …

, … . … , , “ ” –

“ ”… . …

, , ” [2, 154-155] .

, 1991 . [3], 1996 .

[5]. 1998, 2000 ., ,

, , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

270

[1, 29-36]. 2000

., , ,

, . , ,

[6, 3-4]. 2003, 2004 .,

, ,

, [8, 37-43]. 2003 .,

. -

, ( 1995 .)

( , , , , , ,

, , , , , .) ( , , ,

, .), [8, 182-183; 10].

. . , , ,

, “ ” , ( , .

) 1982 ., . 1998 .,

” ( ) . “ ” 2002 . “ , , ” [10, 283-285],

, , [7; 10, 283]. ( – ),

, , ( , – ),

( , , , , , , ,

, , , , .), , ( - )

), (“ , ” ) [9, 298].

, , , .- . , ,

, , , , .)

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

271

[10, 285], ( “ , ”) ,

– .

, , “ ” ( ). ,

”, , ( , 2010 .

2011 .) – [10, 285]. , : 1) -

( , ) ( ) ( , .); 2)

, : , ; 3) ,

, ; 4) ( ),

( ), ( ) ; 5)

, .

( ) (“ ”, ), ,

, ( ) – ” ( ) – “ ” (

), ( ), ) ( .)

. , , ,

. ( ) – , – [10, 285-288]. “ ”

) , ) ( – ,

.) ( -).

, , , ,

[10, 286]. , “ ”, [11; 10, 286].

( ) , . , ( ) , , : –

, – , –

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

272

, – ) [9, 461]. , ,

( , , , ), , , [10, 295],

. – ,

. ( , –

) , ( ), -

. – ( 1924 ., , , ,

.). , ( ) – ( ) [10, 286].

“ ” ( ) .

, ( ) -

[10, 288-292]. ) ,

( ) ( ) [10, 292]. 1) -

2) “ ” 3) “ ” ( . )

4) 5) (

. 1995 ., , .)

. ,

, , , ( , , , , , .)

, , . . , , (“ ”

. “ ”, . ), ( 1934 .)

“ ” ( .VI 1937 .) , ,

( . VI 1954 .), “ ” (1) , 2) 3

3) ), ( “ ” 1921

. ), (

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

273

1954 .) “ ”, . . . VII 1954 .) “ ” –

(1) , , 2) , 3) , 4)

. 1954 .), (

) , , ( . , “ ” 1961 .) , “

”. , ” ( , , , , .) .

. . “ ” ( , , , , “ ” , .) . . , , . ., , .

. -

. – -

, . .

( , , , , , ). , . -

[9, 461-462; 10,284]. ( ) ( ) ( w )

. ( )

( ) [10, 288-292] (“ ”

” ) ( , , .) [10, 284]. ,

(“ , ” “ ”

– , , ).

– . “ ”, ( , , .)

( “ ” “ ” )

( , “ ”). - – [10, 284]. ,

1927 ., , , .

. , -

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

274

( 1915 ., 2003 ., 2003 . .)

[10, 293]. , – .

[11], “ ” “ ” ( ). “ ” :

”? ( ) ” ( 1970-

.) ., V . , , ,

( 2000- . ),

: , – , , – , , –

, , – , , –

, , – “ ” , [11].

( -) .

, , 1) ( ), 2) ( -“ ”-“ ”)

, ), , 3) ( ),

– , , 4) , ( , , ) 5) ( ,

, ) . , -: ,

( “ ” “ ”), -, (

) , , )

). “ ”

. , ( , ) , [10, 289-292],

, , - , , ,

, “ ” . , , , ,

[10, 295] ( - - , ), ,

, “ ”

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

275

, , , .) , . .,

[4, 170], , ( ) (

1960- . ,

, , , . , . “ ” ),

( , , , , , , .) . . – [9, 461], ,

[6] ( , , , , ,

, , .), – [10, 289-295]. “ ”

“ ”, , : , ,

– , , , .

( , 314 1987 .) “ ”, ,

, , . , , , ,

, . . ( , ) “ ”,

, . . ( ,

, ), [9, 458-459]. ,

, – , , .

, . ,

, ( ). ,

. ,

[9, 461]: . . – ., 1980- . , 1979 .) – . 1999 . –

( 1973 ., 1973 ., 1996 ., 2002 . .).

. – . , ( ) ,

[9, 461] . , (

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

276

) [9, 461-462]. ,

.

, – , ,

, . , .– .

. [9, 462]. – , ,

, -

1989-1992 . , [9,

461].

.

( ) ( , ). ( , ,

, , , , , , , , .). ,

, , , .) – ,

- [10, 295]. ,

(“ ”, ), , : . 1990- . –

( “ ” 1990 ., “ ” – “ ”

1991 ., , . 1993 . .), “ ”, 1996

., “ ” (“ ” 1996 ., “ : ”

, . . 1996 ., 1996 – 2000 . “ ”

“ ” ” 1997 . ).

” 1999 . [9, 461] : ,

:

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

277

, , .), (« » , ,

, , . , .), - (« » ,

, , , “ ” “ ” , , ,

.), ( , , .), (« » , , , , .)

( , , .) ( . ):

( , , , , .), –

“ ” ( ) . , ,

. ( “ ”, “ ”,

, ) 1) , 2) 3) -

( ) ( ) ,

, , , ( ) . .

, , ,

.

1. . / . // . – 2000. - 9. .29-45.

2. . : , , / . - .: . 1991. 200 .

3. . – : / – .: , 1991. 413 .

4. / , , , , , – .: . 1983. 296 .

5. . / . – .: , 1996. 413 .

6. . / . // . – 2000. - 7. - .3-4

7. . / , , . – .:

– . 2003. 592 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

278

8. . ( ) / . // .- 2004. - 3. -

.37-43. 9. .

/ . // . – 2008. – .10, 1 (36).- .1. – .455-464.

10. ., . / .,

. // . – 20011. – .13, 2 (48).- .3. – .283-296.

11. Blum H. A map of Misreading. N.Y., 1975. 213 p.

Summary Khaletsky O.V., Khalecka O.O.

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PARADIG IN ELITISTIC DISCURSION Social and cultural paradigm has his root in modern commonly-

conceptualstatement, so-called new directions of science, legitimated in birthrated philosophy of universal evolutionism. History isn’t the contribution, but a process of it’s creation because of: 1) eventually-partually branching (the idea of sinergetics), 2) social and intellectual cultural project (the idea of so-called “new history”), as 3) plurality of discussions – new meanings (“demon texture” by R.Barton, or “labyrinth” by U.Ecko). Peculiar genome of socisl life are culture decree, are the type of civilizational development is determined with the help of genetic codes, which are the systems of valuation. Social and cultural development in social thought are means treably: Firstly, as historical and spiritual totality (school of “Annales” and all others “annaloides”), Secondly, as fulfilment of social and cultural projects (postmodernism and poststructuralism) and, Thirdly, as determined role of consciousness and spiritual determinantes from the middle of the XX century are gaining an important meaning, and social and cultural development is presented.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

279

378.046.4 ., ., , ©

.,

.

.

: , , .

,

; , . ,

, . , ,

. ,

, .

) , , ,

, , , . -

, ,

:“ “, “ “., “ “, .

( ” ”, , , )

, , , .

,

.

© ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

280

.

, : - ; - ,

, , , -;

- ;

- , , ,

, ; - ,

.

, ,

, , , , .

, , .

- ( , , , ), , (

, ). , ,

. ,

, , .

, , ,

, , ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

281

1. ., . . – .:

, 1990. – 248 . 2. . .

. – .: , 2002.-512 . 3. . ,

, ( ) . : . . – : , 2001. - 2(2)- .129-134.

4. ., . . / / - : ,

2009. -115 . 5. . . – .: ,

1998.- 256 . 6. . . – .: ,

2000.- 576 . 7. . . – .: ,

2002.- 501 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

282

378.14 ., ., ., ., ., .,

., ., ., ., ., . ©

. : , , , , , .

, , , ,

. . ,

. , , , ,

. , . .

.

, – .

. ,

, , , . :

- , , , ,

; - ; - (

, , ;

- , , , .

, . ,

, © ., ., ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

283

; , . , ; , .

, : - ( )

… - - , ,

, ( ) ,

. , .

, .

(I , ) ( , …).

( ) – .

( ) , . :

, ; ; . : , ; ;

. .

, . ,

. , , ,

. .

, . ,

, . .

. , –

. , – . , ,

… : « », , , ,

, , , – .

: , . .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

284

, , . : , , , .

: ( ),

, , , . » , , ,

. « ,

, .

– « »,

. .

. « »

. « » ,

. « » 20

. 30%, –

20%, – 54 %. , , ,

, , , , , , , , .

, , , , , , , , , , .

, , , , , , , , , .

, , , , , , , , .

, .

. . ,

, , – ,

. .

, .

, : - ; - ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

285

- ( ) ( );

- : – , – , –

; - ( 9×9

) ; - , ; - , ; - , ,

; - ; - ,

.

1. . . – , 1997. 2. . , ., . .

– . – ,1996. 3. . : – . – -

, 1996. 4. ., . – -

,1995. 5. ., ., .

. – .: , 1987. 6. ., .

. – : ,1995. 7. . . – .: , 1966. – 224 . 8. . . . – .: . , 1985.

9. . // . – .,1997. – .729-730.

10. . ., . . // .

.. . – ., 1999. – .3 (II) . – .122-125. 11. ., . .- 2-

. – .: ,2006.- 347.

Summary It has been handled the problem of increase importance of perception and

awareness of educational information by creating an optimal environment.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

286

801.82:811.111(73).42 ., c., ., . ©

. .

as + adj +as like + noun. .

. : , , ,

, .

. , ,

, [1, 38]. – ,

, [2, 59].

( ) .

, [3, 282].

, . [4], . [5], . [6], . [7], . [8], . Anderson [9], D. Peaty [10].

([11], [12]) ([13]) .

.

[14], [15]. , . ,

, , ( ) [16, 165].

, , . ,

, , [17, 95], .

( ) ,

(red tape – ) [3, 282]. © ., ., 2012

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

287

, .

, . , : 1) phrasal verbs without objects (to wake up –

); 2) separable phrasal verbs (to put (something) on - ); 3) inseparable phrasal verbs (to call on (someone) – ); 4) phrasal verbs with extra prepositions (to get along with (someone) –

); 5) verb-noun combinations (to catch a cold – ); 6) verb-noun-preposition combinations (find fault with (someone/something) – ); 7) preposition-noun combinations (in time – ); 8) preposition-noun and preposition-adjective-noun combinations (of course – , in the long run –

); 9) preposition-noun-preposition combinations (in spite of – ); 10) preposition-adverb and preposition-adjective combinations (at once – ); 11) adjective-noun combinations (golden opportunity –

); 12) noun phrases (sandwich course – , ); 13) idioms from metaphors (white elephant –

); 14) verbal idioms from metaphors (put (one’s) foot down – ); 15) short idioms (pig-headed – ); 16) pair idioms (day after day –

); 17) adjectival idioms (tired of – ); 18) verb-preposition combinations (accuse someone of something – ); 19) miscellaneous verbal expressions (to come true – ); 20) everyday expressions (on the other hand – ) [10].

, as +adj +as like + noun.

1. as + adj +as. , : s wet as a fish, s plump as a

partridge, s strong as a horse, as gay as a lark, as savage as a tiger, as blind as a bat, as poor as a rat, as weak as a cat, as soft as a mole, as rough as a bear, as cold as a frog, as sick as a dog, as mild as a dove, as sharp as an owl, as sly as a fox, as live as a bird, as proud as a peacock, as gentle as a lamb, as blue as a sky, as busy as a bee, as busy as a child at play, as slippery as an eel, as sound as a bell, as active as quicksilver, as cool as a cucumber, as meek as a lamb, as right as rain, as black as a crow, as big as an elephant.

“ + , , , ”: , , ,

. .

. [3, 283]. .

[17, 96]. 2. v+like + noun ( “

”): like water off a duck’s back, like a bull in a china shop, like cat and dog, like a bear with a sore head, like a pig (to eat like a pig), , , ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

288

. (unchangeable idioms, cast-iron idioms, phraseological fusions) [3, 290].

[17, 96]. . - word-group idioms [16, 165].

: like a shot – in half a trice, in the twinkling of an eye – like winkling, like lightning – like a streak of lightning – with lightning speed ( , ) [3, 306].

: like draws to like, like will to like (

) [3, 308]. ),

), ), , , , ,

[17, 96].

: 1) , -

. , , , , , : a bone of contention – ;

2) , : as short as a dog’s tail – , ; as pale as a

paper – ; to know smth as one knows his ten fingers – , ; as clear as day light – , ; to lead a cat and

dog life – . : 1)

; 2) : to follow like St. Anthony’s pig – ;

3) .

. ): like mistress, like maid – ;

4) ( , , ).

, [16, 166-167]. , ,

, , . , , , , ,

, , . ,

, , , , .

, : to treat one like a lord – ( ) , fight like Kilkenny cats – . ,

: to drop like a hot

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

289

potato – , , .

, [15]. ,

: 1) , ( (1 , .):

to be the apple of someone’s eye – , ; (3 k.): to keep someone at one’s arm’s length –

; (8 .): they were fighting with their backs to the wall – ; (1 .): to have no backbone – ; (5 .):

to feel something in one’s bones – ; (2 .) to rack one’s brains over something – ; (1 .): to make a clean breast of something – ; (1 .): keep your chin up! –

!; (7 .): to be wet behind the ears – ; (1 .): to be up to the elbows in work – ; (13 .):

his eyes were bigger than his stomach – – ; (10 .): to save face – ; (6 .): to have two left feet –

; (9 .): to keep one’s fingers crossed – ; (4 .): to be all thumbs –

; (2 .): to be on one’s toes – ; (6 .): has the cat got your tongue? - , ?; (6 .): not to turn a hair – ; (28 .): to be in good hands –

; (22 .): use your head to save your feet – ; (26 .): from the bottom of one’s heart

– ; (2 .): to drag one’s heels – ; (4 .): to be down in the mouth – ; (6 .): to be breathing down one’s neck – ; (11 .): to pay through the nose –

; (4 .): to give someone the cold shoulder – ; (5 .): to be soaked to the skin – ;

(2 .): to have a cast-iron stomach – ; (3 .): to be armed to the teeth – ; (1 .): to have a sweet tooth –

; (2 .): to thrust something down someone’s throat – ; (1 .): at the top of one’s lungs – );

2) , ( (1 .): have ants in one’s pants – ,

; (6 .): a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush – , ; (2 .): to take the bull by the horns – ; (2 .): to let the cat our of the bag – ; (2

.): to count one’s chickens before they hatch – ; (1

.): as the crow flies – ; (4 .): barking dog seldom bites – , , ; (2 .): to take to something like a duck to water

– ; (4 .): like a fish out of water – ; (2 .): to harm not a fly – ; (1 .): to get

someone’s goat – ; (3 .): to cook one’s goose – ; (5 .): hold your horses! – ! (1 .): to do

something as a lark – ; (1 .): a leopard can’t change

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

290

its spots – ; (1 .): to receive the lion’s share – ; (2 .): as quiet as a mouse – ,

; (2 .): to buy a pig in a poke – ; (1 .): one swallow does not make a summer – ; (3 .): to cry wolf – ); 3) ,

( ( 1 .): to spill the beans – ; (2 .): to know which side one’s bread is buttered on –

, ; t (2 .): hat takes the cake! – ! (1 .): to put all one’ eggs in one basket – ; (1 .) to be

in a jam – ; (1 .): a hard nut to crack – ; (2 .): to burn the midnight oil – ;

(1 .): to be as like as two peas in a pod – ; (1 .): to eat humble pie – ; (1 .):

a hot potato – ; (3 .): the salt of the earth – ; (1 .): to be sandwiched in between – ; (1 .): to be packed in like sardines – ); 4) ,

( (1 .): to be tied to one’s mother’s apron – ; (10 .): to be old hat – ); (1 .): to wear the pants in the family – ; (1 .) to lose one’s shirt – ;

(7 .): not to want to be in one’s shoes – ; 5) ,

( (1 .): to get the axe – , ; (1 .): to have someone over a barrel –

; (2 .): to get up on the wrong side of the bed – ; (1 .): to be a wet blanket – ,

; (1 .): to call someone on the carpet – ; (1 .): it’s like looking for a needle in a haystack –

; (1 .): to throw in the towel – , ); 6) ,

( (2 .): to paint a thing black – ; (3 .): till you are blue in the face –

); 7) , ( (3 .): to be in the same boat –

; (1 .) to paddle one’s own canoe – ); 8) , ( (2

.): don’t cross your bridges before you come to them – ; (1 .): to sit on the fence – ;

(2 .): to put someone through the mill – ; (2 .): to live in an ivory tower – ;

(4 .): to be up against a brick wall – ); 9) , ( (2 .): the

dawn of a new age – ; (18 .): he has known better days – ; (2 .) in the dead of night – ); 10) ,

( (1 .): to run in the family – ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

291

(1 .): like father, like son – , ; (1 .) necessity is the mother of invention – )); 11) ,

( (1 .): to play first/second fiddle – ; (1 .): to blow one’s own trumpet – , ).

, .

. , ( , 203 46 342

). , (46 18, ).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

203 46 18 20 8 5 4 11 22 3 2

32 18 14 5 7 2 2 4 3 3 2

,

: (looking for a needle in a haystack – , the salt of the earth – ),

, (to be tied to one’s mother’s apron – , feel something in one’s bones – ), (to cook one’s goose – , a leopard can’t change its spots –

), (to burn the midnight oil – , to cry wolf – ).

. 342 , ,

, , . .

.

1. ., ., . / . , . , . – .: ., 2003. – 462

. 2. .

// / . . – , 1989. – . 59–65.

3. . English Lexiocology // . . – ., .., 1971. – 336 .

4. . / . . – : . , 1983. – 112 .

5. . / . . – .: ., 1966. – 86 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

292

6. . / . . – .: ., 1985. – 276 .

7. Weinreich, U.Problems in the Analysis of Idioms: Substance and Structure of Language / U. Weinreich. – Loss Angeles, University of California Press, 1984 – 234 p.

8. . / . . – , 1992. – 286 .

9. Anderson C. Easy Approach to English Idioms and Idiomatic Expressions: In 2 vols / C. Anderson. – Hong Kong: Book Marketing, Inc., 1974.

10. Peaty David. Working With English Idioms / David Peaty. – Harlow: Longman, 1996. – 110 p.

11. Longman Idioms. Dictionary. – Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2000. 12. . – .: , 1997. 13. : 2- .. – .: . , 1993. 14. . – .: . , 1969. 15. ., ., . ,

/ A. . , . . – .: “ ”, 2005. – 173 .

16. Korunets’ Ilko. Contrastive Typology of the English and Ukrainian Languages / Ilko Korunets’. – , Nova Knyha, 2003. – 459 p.

17. . / . . – .: . , 1962. – 496 .

Summary

TO THE PROBLEM OF ENGLISH PHRASEOLOGY INVESTIGATION The given investigation is devoted to the problem of phraseologisms in English and Ukrainian languages. Structural classifications of these linguistic units are stated. Stable idiomatic similies of the types as + adj +as and like + noun are investigated in more details Semantic groups of English idioms are proposed. The ways of phraseologiacal units translation are mentioned.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

293

. .

, .

In the article strategic principles of development of production of milk are reflected in sucklings person who tend cattle economies and products of his processing in the conditions of market economy, certainly basic directions of increase of competitiveness of these enterprises of APK in modern terms.

: , , , ,

. Keywords: to the competitiveness of production of milk, intensification,

sucklings person who tend cattle enterprises, government control, investment process.

. , , ,

, ,

. , ,

, ,

, .

,

, ,

.

.

, .

. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

294

.

. .

, ,

, .

,

: ; ;

, ,

; ; ;

. [1, . 171].

. , .

, -

, , ,

.

. ,

, [6, . 17].

.

, - . ,

, : ,

;

; ;

, ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

295

, ;

; ; ; .

,

.

( 1-2 ) .

.

[1, . 57]. , ,

, , ,

. , ,

, , , , ,

60%, 83%.

80%, . .

, ( 2007 1,6 – 1,7 .), ,

. , , .

.

0,8, 1% 0,8%.

[4, . 2].

, ,

. ,

, ,

.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

296

-

, , , , ,

, . :

-

, ,

; ,

, , ,

;

;

;

;

;

, , ,

( );

.

. , , –

( ) , , .

: , ,

, [2, . 268].

, 20–40%

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

297

. .

5-10%, .

. , .

[2, . 458].

,

, : – « »

, , , );

( - ),

;

( ) [6, . 48].

, , .

.

10-15%, .

, . , ,

, , , ,

[3, . 130].

, . ,

, [5].

. : , , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

298

. ,

. .

1. . . : , , : [ .] / . . , A.M. . – : 2008. – 198 .

2. . . / . . //

. – .: , 2002. – 730 .

3. . .

/ . . // . – 2008. – 10. – . 129–133. 4. . – / . //

. – 2009. – 41. – . 2-3. 5. . .

/ . . // . – 2010. – 1. – . 13-17.

6. . . : [ ] / . . . – .: ,

2001. – 328 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

299

332.2.021 .

. ,

, .

, . ,

, , ,

, .

, , ,

,

. , , ,

. ,

. . ,

, ,

: . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .

,

,

.

,

, ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

300

, .

. , –

, –

, –

. .

, . , ,

, , . ,

90- XX , .

, . ,

. 22,2 . , 3,2 .

. 7 . , , 6,8 .

. 11 . :

, , , .

11,3 . 16.1 . [1].

, 1991 , .

, . ,

,

. ,

, - .

– ,

, , ,

. " " , , , , ,

, .

, , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

301

, - .

,

. ,

(1992 .). (2002 .)

, .

. .

,

. ,

.

, ,

.

.

. : 50,9%, 49,1%. :

, , , . : , , .

– , – .

1666,7 . (59,3 % ), – 1358,9 . , – 135,7 . , – 117,3 . ,

– 42,1 . 2213 . 436 ; 157

; 47 ; 1474 ; 44 ; 55

( . 1) [2].

2010- ., , .

2010 . 6,4 %. (2- ). 2010 . 6 . 632

. . 2011 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

302

1260,4 . ., 0,5 % 2010 . ( . 2) [3].

436; 20%

47; 2%44; 2%

157; 7%

1474; 67%

55; 2%

. 1. 2011 .*

2010 . 3 .

388 ., 51% . 3).

, , , ,

2009 . , 2010 .,

. 2482,5 . , - 38,5 . 01.06.2010 .

811,8 . . (+ 69,6 ) - 412,3 . (+16,2 )

. .: - 43 ., - 143,6 . , - 172,9 . [4]. 40,8 . , - 97,8 . ,

60,8 . , 9,6 . , - 93,2 . , - 21,7 . . 30,5 . (+13,1

), 24,9 . (+13,3 ), - 34,2 . (+12,3 . ).

1094 . . (+98 ) ( . 4).

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

303

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

. .

. 2.

*

2396

2830 28403078

3499 3388

1049

1518 1481 1555 15101781 1752

3062

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

. .

. 3. *

, 17 %

. ,

, [5]. 2010 .

215,1 . (

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

304

), 13,7 . , 36,6 . , 164,7 . . 2010 . 3,1 % , .

3,2 % 2,6 . . 85,2 . .

3,4 . 24,9 % (17,2 . ).

533,8670,7 668,1 638,1 623,3 648,2 644,3

1369,8

2314 2283,8

1856,5 1795,9

2592,92483

25,7 34,5 34,2 29,1 28,8 40 38,50

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

. .

, , ,

. 4. *

. 2010 . 519 ,

4980 ( 1 , ), .

, , , 2010 .

50 , 2132 .

. ,

, ,

. , .

: – , ; – ; – ; – ;

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

305

– ; – ,

, , .

1. : , . ( 6) / .

. — .: , 2011. — 764 . — .331. 2. [ ] :

web– . — : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. 3.

( ): / . . , . . ; .: . . — .: ,

2011. — 168 . 4. : . . / .: .

; . . — ., 2011. — 342 . 5. : / .

. — .: , 2011. — 214 . — .157; 2011 / :

. . — .: « », 2011. — 247 . — .48–55.

.

, , ,

,

. , , ,

. ,

, . : , , ,

, .

.

, ,

,

, . ,

, , .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

306

, .

: , , , , .

Chuzhmyr M.A.

Zemlezabezpechenyst Efficiency and functioning of the agricultural enterprises in Kiev region

It is set in the article, that in agriculture, as a result of feature of production, development of bagatoukladnosti, through organization of new and restructuring of existent economies on a peculiar on earth and other capital goods, there were specific terms of integration of earth in the system of public relations. It touches and that directly the producers of agricultural produce, which are the proprietors of earth, create rent and can appropriate it. It is well-proven that the structure of land-tenure determining appearance influences on specialization of agricultural production, his efficiency and dokhidnist.

Key words: earth, zemlezabezpechenist', agriculture, agricultural enterprises, producers.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

307

: 364.48: 338.435

.

.

. ,

« », .

.

, . : . , , . , . ,

. , . , , . , . , . , , . . ,

.

.

: « », »;

; ; .

. « » ,

. , ,

. . , ,

[1], , [2].

, , , ,

. , « » -

. ,

, .

. , ,

, - [3, .35].

, ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

308

( , ).

: –

, – .

. ,

,

.

, , « » « ». », « », ,

« », « » « ».

[4]. . , . , . ,

. , . . ,

. ,

.

, , , .

. : [5, . 64]. ,

, ,

.

« ».

, ( ),

– .

, , ,

. , , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

309

. ,

, .

, , ,

. ,

– . -

– , , , , , , , ,

. , , –

( ), .

. , – ,

[6]. , . ,

, (

), .

, ,

, [ 7, c.9 ].

. . ,

, , ,

. , , , , ,

, , [8, .312]. – ,

.

[9]. , ( , ), ,

. – .

, – ,

. ,

, , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

310

. , , ,

,

. ,

, .

. , ,

, ( , , , , , , ,

).

, .

, ,

( ), .

. , [10].

90- . . .

, : ,

, , ,

: , , , , .

.

.

, . , , :

( , , , ); ( , , ); ( ,

, ); ( , , , ) [11].

. ( , , ,

) , ,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

311

, ) [12]. , ,

, . , , .

.

,

, , , , , , ;

, , , ,

. , ,

. ,

[13].

. , :

- ( , -, -, -, , , .);

- ( , , ); -

, , ); - ( , , , ,

); :

- ( , , );

- ( , , );

- ( , , , , -

); - , , ( ,

, , , .) 14 . ,

, . . ,

, ,

. ,

.

,

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

312

.

.

, , , ,

.

1. . : . / . . - . . . – ,

1984. – 250 . 2. . – .:

, 1987. –240 . 3. . : /

. . – .: , 1980. – 206 . 4. . . /

. , . . – .: , 1981. – 217 . 5. . /

. , . // . – 2002. – 2.– . 63-68. 6. .

( ). - . ... . . : 08.09.01. – , 2003. - 39 .

7. . : / . . – .: , 1996. – 172 .

8. . / . . - . . . – .: IAE , 1999.–

362 . 9. (

). – .: – « ». – 2006. – 260 .

10. . / . //

. – 47. – 1995. – . 92-96. 11. .

: / . . – : , 2002. – 264 .

12. . / . , . , . . – .: ,

2001. – 119 . 13. . / . ,

// .- . . « ». – 4. – 2006. – .102-111.

14. . / . . – ., 2003. – 60 .

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

313

. , « »,

, .

: , , , , .

. ,

», ,

. : , ,

, , .

Summary This article explores the social and economic infrastructure of rural nature.

In particular, proved the concept of «social infrastructure», defines the peculiarities of the social infrastructure of rural areas as an economic category, determine the composition of objects and the classification of social infrastructure.

Key-words: infrastructure, social infrastructure, rural areas, classification, objects.

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

314

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION AND

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ALTERATION

1. ., ., .

………………………………………………………... 3 2. .

-

………………………………………………………... 11 3. .

- …………………………………………………. 15

4. ., .

…………………………………………………….. 19 5. .

……………. 26

6. . ., . . —

. ……….. 30 7. ., .

……………………………………………………... 33

8. .

……………… 38 9. ., .

…………………………………………………… 43 10. ., .

……………… 47

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

315

11. .

………………………….. 53 12. .

…………………………………………. 57

13. ., . ………………. 64

14. ., .

…………….. 68 15. .

( )

……………………………………... 80 16. ., .

……………………………………………… 87 17. ., .

………………………………………………………………… 93

18. .

……. 100 19. .

…………………………….. 117

20. .

……. 122 21. .

. 126

22. ., .

…….. 133 23. .

………….

138 24. .

……………………………………….

144

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

316

25. .

……………... 151

HUMANITARIAN EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOL

26. ., .

– …………………………………………………. 158

27. .

…………….. 164 28. ., ., ., .

…………………………………………………. 169

29. ., . :

………………………………………………………. 174 30. .

……………………………………. 179

31. . (1917-1991 .) ………… 184

32. . .

……………... 189 33. ., .

……………………………………………………. 194 34. . ., . .

: ………………………………………….….. 200

35. . ., . . “ ” ………………… 204

36. .

……………………………………………………………….. 208

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

317

37. ., ., ., .

……………………………………... 214

38. .

…………………………………..

218 39. . ., . .

1929-39 ……... 224 40. .

20- . ………………………………………………………………….. 228

41. .

………………………………………………. 235 42. .

………………… 239 43. ., .

………… 244 44. .

1917-1921 …………………………………………………………… 251

45. . ………………………………………………. 256

46. . : .. 260

47. .

………………………. 263 48. ., .

…………………………………………………………….. 267

49. ., .

. ………………….. 279 50. ., ., ., .

…………………….. 282

51. ., .

………………………………………………...

286

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

318

52. . .

293 53. .

………………………… 299 54. .

……………………………………………. 307

. 14 2 (52) 4, 2012

319

. 1998

Scientific Messenger

of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies

named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj

“ ”

14, 2 (52) 4

Series “Economical sciences”

20.06.2012. 70 1/16 . Times New Roman. 1. . . . 26,49.

100 . . 20/06.

. ., ., , . 18

. : [email protected], . (032) 243-68-49 1948318017, 02 635667

13.09.2007