Ms. Gourisha Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for c - District Courts

SEBI v. Sunshine Infrabuild Corporation Ltd & Ors. CC No. 46/18

09.09.2021

Present: Ms. Gourisha Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for complainant.

Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave in pre-lunch

session.

As per the directions of Ld. Presiding Officer, list the

matter for purpose already fixed on 22.12.2021.

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

SEBI v. Nicer Green Housing & Infrastructure Developers LtdCC No. 26/2018

09.09.2021


A-4 Surender Kaur present on bail.


session.


matter for purpose already fixed in terms of previous order dated

13.01.2021 on 22.12.2021.

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

SEBI v. Nicer Green Forest Ltd & orsCC No. 13/17

09.09.2021


A-4 Surender Kaur present on bail.


session.


matter for purpose already fixed in terms of previous order dated

13.01.2021 on 22.12.2021.

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

Subhash Nagpal v. SEBI M. No. 02/2019

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Rinku Mathur and Sh. Abhik Kumar, Ld. counsel for

applicant.

Ms. Gourisha Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for respondent

/SEBI.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

SEBI v. Unickon Securities Ltd. CC No. 28/17

09.09.2021



session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

Tribhuvan Kumar Jain v. UOICr No. 37/2021

09.09.2021

Present: Ms Shalini, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Rekha Pandey, Ld. SPP for UOI/respondent.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

FIR No. 55/2013PS Special Cell

State Vs. Mohd Shahid & Ors.

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State.

Accused Md. Shahid present on bail.

Accused Arshad produced through VC from Presidency

Jail, Calcutta.

Accused Ashabuddin, Rashid and Abdul Subhan are

produced from J/C.

Sh. Sanawar Chaudhary, Ld. counsel for accused

Mohd. Shahid and Mohd. Rashid

Sh. Harsh, Ld. proxy counsel for accused Abdul

Subhan.

Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave today in pre-

lunch session.

PW 39 Sh. Manishi Chandra, DCP has sent a written

request regarding his non-availability.

As per the directions of Ld. Link Judge, put up for PE

on 13.09.2021.

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021.

Ankur Saini v. Hukam SinghCA No. 04/2020

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Ankur Singhal, Ld. counsel for appellant through

VC.

Sh. Sandeep Sharma, Ld. counsel for respondent.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

Ramanand Rangera v. Child Welfare CommitteeCA No. 16/2021

09.09.2021

Present: Appellant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. Ashok Tobria.

Ms Vaidehi Subramani, Ld. counsel for respondent.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

Sanjana Devi v. StateCA No. 14/2021

09.09.2021

Present: Appellant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. Ashok Tobria.

Ms Vaidehi Subramani, Ld. counsel for respondent.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

BRPL V. ASHOKCC NO. 41/2020

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Aslam Ahmed, Ld. counsel for complainant.


session.

As per the directions of Ld. Link Judge, list the matter

for purpose already fixed on 23.12.2021.

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

State v. Amar Mandal FIR No. 230/2019PS Special Cell

09.09.2021


Accused is not produced from j.c .

Sh. D. P. Pandey, Ld. counsel for accused.

P/W of accused be issued against the accused for

NDOH.

List the matter for arguments on charge and for

arguments on pending bail application of accused on 27.09.2021.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02, NDD/PHC/New Delhi

09.09.2021

State v. Sanjay & Ors. FIR No. 284/2020PS Sarojini Nagar

09.09.2021


Accused persons not produced from j.c.


session.


for purpose already fixed on 24.01.2022 .

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

State v. Anil @ Rohan & Ors FIR No. 156/2016PS South Campus

07.09.2021


Accused Anil, Deepu and Prince present on bail.

Remaining accused persons not produced from j.c.

Sh. Umakant Kataria, Ld. LAC for accused Anil @

Rohan.

Sh. D. P. Pandey, Ld. counsel for remaining accused

persons.


session.


for purpose already fixed on 24.11.2021 .

AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

State v. Baharuddin & anrFIR No. 36/2014PS Special Cell

07.09.2021


Accused Baharuddin is P.O.

Accused Badruddin is present.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

State v. Manish @ rishi FIR No. 50/2016PS Special Cell

07.09.2021


Accused Manish produced from j.c.

Ms. Anjali Rajput, Ld. amicus curiae for accused.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

Amit Mavi v. State CR No. 34/2021

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Sidharth Mehta alongwith Sh. Hitaish Chauhan, Ld.

counsel for petitioner.


session.



AHLMAD: 09.09.2021

State v. Mohd. Irfan & anrFIR No. 472/2015

PS Vasant Kunj ( South)

09.09.2021


Ms Priyanka Tomar, Ld. counsel for complainant.

Sh. Pankaj Bhatty, AR of the complainant company.

Both accused present on bail.

Sh. H. S Chadha, Ld. counsel for accused persons.

Sh. Vijay Prakash Yadav, DGM/Complainant is present.

It is jointly informed by both the parties that matter has

been settled with the accused persons and requested that matter be

referred to Lok Adalat.

Let the statement of complainant be recorded

separately in this regard.

At joint request, let the matter be referred to Lok Adalat

scheduled to be held on 11.09.2021.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02/NDD/PHC/ND

09.09.2021

State v. Mohd. IrfanFIR No. 472/2015

PS Vasant Kunj ( South)

09.09.2021

Statement of Sh. Vijay Prakash Yadav, DGM, BSES, office at Sector-

09, R. K. Puram, New Delhi.

On SA:

I am the complainant in the present case. Both the

accused persons, in the present matter, have settled the present

case with the complainant company and accordingly have paid the

settled amount against the case ID RJ220814SC039.

RO & AC (Dharmender Rana)

ASJ-02/NDD/PHC/ND

09.09.2021

Raju v. Chandan SinghCA No. 17/2021

09.09.2021

Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.

Present: Appellant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. Naval

Kishore.

Put up for consideration on 17.09.2021.


09.09.2021

Case No. 32/2017ECIR/HQ/17/2017

ED Vs. Gagan Dhawan & Ors.

09.09.2021

File taken up on undertaking filed on behalf of applicant Suresh

Nandlal Rohira and his wife Mamtha Rohira.

Present: None.

Issue court notice of the above undertakings to the

applicant as well as to Directorate of Enforcement for 15.09.2021.


09.09.2021

IN THE COURT OF SH. ANIL ANTIL, ASJ-04, PHC, NDD, NEW DELHI

Bail Application No. 1792/21FIR No. 152/21PS: Connaught Placeu/s 188/268/270/153-A IPC & Sec. 3 of ED Act & 51B of DM ActState Vs. Deepak Singh Hindu

09.09.2021

This is an application under section 439 CrPC moved on behalf of

applicant / accused Deepak Singh Hindu for grant of regular bail,

which is fixed for today.

Present : Sh. Siddharth Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant/accused Deepak Singh Hindu.

Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State alongwith IO SI

Ramkesh Meena.

Reply to the bail application has already been filed.

Today matter was listed for further arguments in continuation

with the arguments addressed yesterday by the learned counsel for the

applicant/accused. However, at the outset, learned counsel submits that

he is not pressing the bail application moved on behalf of the

applicant/accused Deepak Singh Hindu, at this stage, and prayed that it

be disposed off as withdrawn.

In view of submissions so made, the application stands

disposed off as withdrawn.

Ordered accordingly.

E Copy of the order be provided to all the parties and in

addition be given dasti.

Order be uploaded on the website.

(Anil Antil) Addl. Sessions Judge -04,

New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi/09.09.2021


Bail Application No. 1851/21FIR No. 165/2011PS: Tilak Marg u/s 328/365/366/120-B/376 IPC State Vs. Kedar

09.09.2021


applicant / accused Kedar for grant of regular bail, which is fixed

for today.

Present : Sh. Pramod Tyagi, learned counsel for the

applicant/accused Kedar.

Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State alongwith IO

W/ASI Clara Toppo

Reply to the bail application filed. Copy Supplied.

Learned Addl. PP for the State submits that matter pertains

to the year 2011 ; the applicant/accused was Proclaimed Offender in this

case ; the case qua other accused persons have been disposed off and

for disposal of this application TCR be summoned.

As prayed, TCR be summoned for date fixed.

Complainant /victim through IO be also summoned for date

fixed.

Re notify for consideration of application on 21.09.2021.




Bail Application No. 1516/21FIR No. 39/2021PS: Barakhamba Road u/s 420/406 IPC State Vs. Karanbir Singh Sandhu

09.09.2021


applicant / accused Karanbir Singh Sandhu for grant of

Anticipatory bail, which is fixed for today.

Present : Sh. Viraj R. Datar, learned Senior Counsel alongwith Sh.Nitin

Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant/accused Karanbir Singh

Sandhu.

Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State alongwith SI

Ravi Kumar.

During arguments, IO submits that he is still at Patiala,

Punjab carrying out investigation of the present case, and the

applicant/accused pursuant to some questionnaire has sought sometime

to go through the record before answering the questionnaire put to him. A

long adjournment is also prayed by the IO.

In view of submissions so made, let a detailed status report

qua the investigations carried out so far be filed on or before the NDOH

with advance copy to opposite party.

At request re-notify for consideration on 29.09.2021.


SC No. 261/2017FIR No. 09/2017 P.S Special Cell u/s 22 & 29 NDPS ActState Vs. Amandeep Singh & Ors

09.09.2021

CHARGE

I, Anil Antil, ASJ-04, PHC, New Delhi District, New Delhi do

hereby charge you : Kishan Singh s/o Sh. Narpat Singh as under :

-

That you Kishan Singh intentionally and actively involved

in the conspiracy with your co-accused persons namely Amandeep

Singh, Harpreet Singh and Hanish Sarpal @ Shin @ Shinu for

the purpose of smuggling / trafficking / transportation of the

contraband and was actively in touch with a person resident of

Mumbai, who used to supply the contrabands to the co-accused

persons namely Amandeep Singh and Harpreet Singh in Mumbai

and as per your directions to the said persons and accused Hanish

Sarpal, in pursuant thereto accused persons ( Amandeep Singh and

Harpreet Singh ), brought the contraband to Delhi and thereafter

delivered it over to co-accused Hanish Sarpal for its transportation to

UK where you accused Kishan Singh used to receive the delivery of

the contraband for its use there.

That on or before 30.01.2017, you along with your co

accused persons namely Amandeep Singh, Harpreet Singh and

Hanish Sarpal @ Shin @ Shinu entered into a criminal conspiracy

for delivery of consignment of about 25 kgs of Mephedrone drug i.e.

psychotropic substance from Mumbai to Delhi in violation of Section

8(c) of NDPS Act and in pursuance of said criminal conspiracy on

15.02.2017at about 06:15 a.m. your co-accused persons

Amandeep Sngh and Harpreet Singh were apprehended at State

Entry Road, New Delhi Railway Station alongwith the above

mentioned consignment of Mephedrone drug and Also on the same

day i.e. on 15.02.2017 at about 09:10 p.m. near Janakpuri West

Metro Station, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi your co-accused Hanish

Sarpal, while going in his i20 car bearing registration no. DL 3C CD

1579 was apprehended and found in possession of 650 grams of

Mephedrone drug and thereby you Kishan Singh committed

offences punishable under Section 29 read with Section 22(c) of

NDPS Act and within the cognizance of this court.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this court for the

above said offences.

( Anil Antil ) Addl. Sessions Judge-04,

New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts New

Delhi/09.09.2021

The above charge has been read over and explained to the

accused and he is questioned as follows :

Q Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?

Ans I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC


New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts New Delhi/09.09.2021


SC No. 261/2017FIR No. 09/2017 P.S Special Cell u/s 22 & 29 NDPS ActState Vs. Amandeep Singh & Ors

09.09.2021

Present : Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State.

All the four accused persons Amandeep Singh, Harpreet

Singh, Hanish Sarpal and Kishan Singh produced in J.C.

Sh. S.S. Dass, learned counsel for the accused Hanish

Sarpal.

Sh. Swapnil Krishna Tripathi, learned counsel for the

accused Harpreet Singh.

Sh. Yogesh Saxena, learned counsel for the accused

Kishan Singh.

Vide order dated 07.09.2021, it was held that prima

facie case for the offence punishable under Section 29 NDPS Act

read with Section 22(c) of NDPS Act is made out against the

accused Kishan Singh s/o Narpat Singh.

Accordingly, charge for the offence punishable under

Section 29 NDPS Act read with Section 22(c) of NDPS Act

framed against the accused Kishan Singh to which he pleaded

not guilty and claimed trial. Now, matter be put up for trial

alongwith other co-accused persons.

Further, it is stated by learned APP for the State that

they do not want to re-examine any witness, already been

examined in so far as present accused Kishan Singh is

concerned. At the same time, learned counsel for the

accused Kishan Singh has also submitted that he does not

wish to recall any witness already examined by the

prosecution for the purpose of cross examination.

Matter be accordingly put up for further evidence on

13.09.2021.

PW SI Ashok, SI Moninder and H.C Lavi be

summoned for PE on date fixed.

MHC(M) alongwith case property, if any, and IO be

summoned for date fixed.




SC No. 240/2020FIR No. 137/2019 P.S Chanakya Puri u/s 363/366 IPCState Vs. Chandrawal @ Bunty

09.09.2021

CHARGE

I, Anil Antil, ASJ-04, PHC, New Delhi District, New Delhi do

hereby charge you : Chandrawal @ Bunty s/o Fagu Ram as

under : -

That on 03.12.2019 at about 07.00 a.m at B-230

Sanjay Camp, Chanakya Puri,New Delhi, a place within the

jurisdiction of P.S. Chanakya Puri, you kidnapped complainant's

minor daughter namely Khushi from her lawful guardianship and

thereby you committed an offence u/s 363 IPC and within the

cognizance of this court.

Secondly, on the above said, date, time and place you

kidnapped minor girl Khushi with intent that she may be compelled

or knowing it to be likely that she will be compelled, to marry against

her will and thereby you committed an offence punishable u/s 366

IPC and within the cognizance of this court.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this court for the

above said offences.


New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts New

Delhi/09.09.2021

The above charge has been read over and explained to the

accused and he is questioned as follows :

Q Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?

Ans I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC




SC No. 240/2020FIR No. 137/2019 P.S Chanakya Puri u/s 363/366 IPCState Vs. Chandrawal @ Bunty

09.09.2021

Present : Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State.

Accused on bail with learned counsel Sh.Manoj Kumar.

Arguments on the point of charge heard.

After considering the submissions of the learned

counsel for the accused, learned APP for the State and also

taking noteof the statement of the complainant and other

witnesses, and the docuemnts filed on record, I am of the

view that Prima facie case for the offence punishable under

Section 363/366 IPC ismade out against the accused.

Accordingly, charge for the aforesaid offence framed

against the accused to which he pleaded not guilty and

claimed trial.

Matter be accordingly put up for prosecution

evidence on 04.01.2022.

Complainant alongwith witnesses at serial no. 2, 3 ,

4, 15 and 16 be summoned for PE on on date fixed.

MHC(M) alongwith case property, if any, and IO be

summoned for date fixed.



CC No. 29/21BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Deepu

09.09.2021

Matter taken up today physically as on previous date

of hearing i.e. 13.05.2021 hearing could not take place in view of

the directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and it was

adjourned enbloc for today.

Present: Sh. Aslam Ahmed, learned counsel for the

complainant department.

Witness, Sh. Balbir Singh, AM is present and

discharged unexamined for today as one of the regular steno of the

court is on leave, another is assigned with miscellaneous court

work alongwith bail orders and no substitute is provided.

Re notify for pre summoning evidence on 08.12.2021

Complainant is directed to take steps for summoning

of the witnesses.

(Anil Antil) ASJ-04/NDD/PHC/ND

09.09.2021

CC No. 131/2019BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Nisha

09.09.2021







No witness is present today.

As prayed, re notify for pre summoning evidence on

08.12.2021.


of the witnesses.


09.09.2021

CC No. 27/21BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Tanish & Anr.

09.09.2021







Witness, Sh. Anzar Alam, AM is present and






of the witnesses.


09.09.2021

CC No. 28/21BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Sunder Singh & Anrs.

09.09.2021







Witness, Sh. Nadeem Khan, AM is present and






of the witnesses.


09.09.2021

CC No. 40/21BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Sheesh Pal

09.09.2021





Present: Ms. Priyanka Tomar, learned counsel for the

complainant department alongwith Mr. Pankaj Bhatty, AR of

complainant.

Witness, Sh. Raju Singh, Team Leader is present and






of the witnesses.


09.09.2021

SC No. 182/2018FIR No. 145/2017PS: Sagarpur State Vs. Ghanshyam etc.

09.09.2021


of hearing i.e. 13.05.2021, hearing could not take place in view of

the directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and the matter

was adjourned enbloc for today.

Present: Sh. S.K.Kain, learned Additional PP for the State.

Both the accused Ghanshyam and Dharma Lama on

Interim bail in terms of guidelines issued by the HPC of Hon'ble High

Court of Delhi.

Sh. Nikhil Mehta and Sh. Varun Sharma, learned counsels

for the accused Dharma Lama.

At the request of learned counsel, regular bail application of

accused Dharma Lama be listed for consideration on 21.09.2021.

Notice be issued to IO to remain present on the dates of

hearing fixed in the matter.

Regular matter be listed for PE on 16.11.2021.

Witnesses alongwith IO and MHC(M) with case property be

summoned for PE on 16.11.2021.


09.09.2021

SC No. 76/2019FIR No. 17/2017PS: South Avenue State Vs. Harish Kumar@Hunny .

09.09.2021Matter taken up today physically as on previous date





Accused Harish Kumar @ Hunny is absent despite several

calls.

Perusal of the record reveals that B.Ws issued against the

accused vide previous orders remained unexecuted. In facts, no report

has been filed by the concerned SHO. Let Show cause notice be issued

to the concerned SHO to give status of B.Ws issued against the accused

earlier on date fixed in the matter.

In the mean time, in terms of previous orders, issue fresh

B.Ws against the accused and notice to his surety to be served through

concerned SHO.

No witness is present today.

In terms of previous orders, B.Ws be summoned alongwith

IO and MHC(M) with case property on 07.02.2022.


09.09.2021

mailto:Kumar@Hunny

CA No. 25/2019FIR No. 548/2015PS Sagarpuru/s 323/354/354-B/452/506/34 IPC Sheelu Vs. State

09.09.2021





Present: Sh. Ravinder Sharma, learned counsel for the

Appellant/accused.

Sh. S.K. Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State /R-1

Sh. Sanjay Bhargawa, learned counsel for R-2 to R-7.

Sh. Ran Bahadur, R-3 is present in person.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that

the cross FIR against the present appellant filed on behalf of the

respondents after making settlement of the dispute has been

quashed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and in terms of the

same, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not

pressing the present appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the

same on behalf of the appellant.

In view of the submissions so made, the present

appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, signatures of Sh. Ravinder

Sharma, learned counsel for appellant taken on the order sheet

itself towards the permission and endorsement of his statement.

Appeal accordingly disposed off.

TCR be sent back to the learned trial court along with copy

of the order after necessary compliance.

The CA file be consigned to record room as per rules.

E copy of the order be supplied to the concerned parties.

Order be also uploaded on the website.


09.09.2021

CR No. 304/2019Pepsico India Holdings Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs. State (NCT of Delhi& Anr.)

09.09.2021





Present: Sh. Rajesh Batra, learned counsel for the

Revisionist/accused.

Sh. Kundan Lal learned Special PP for the State.

It is stated that the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme

Court is scheduled for arguments on 23.09.2021.

In view there of, in continuation with earlier order, at

joint request of learned counsel for parties matter be put up

thereafter as identical issue is involved in the present petition.

Re notify for consideration on 07.12.2021.



09.09.2021

CR No. 305/2019Sunil Kumar Thukrall & Ors. Vs. State (NCT of Delhi & Anr.)

09.09.2021











joint request of learned counsel for parties matter be put up





09.09.2021

CR No. 457/17Nestle India Limited & Anrs Vs. State (NCT of Delhi & Anr.)

09.09.2021











joint request of learned counsel for parties, matter be put up





09.09.2021


09.09.2021
















09.09.2021

CA No. 75/2021FIR No. 301/2019PS Sagarpuru/s 279/338 IPCJoginder Vs. State

09.09.2021Present: Sh. N.K. Srivastawa, learned counsel for the

Appellant/accused Joginder.

Sh. S.K. Kain, learned Addl. PP for the State.

On the strong objection of learned Addl. PP for the

State that the present appeal is not maintainable, learned counsel

for the appellant submits that he is not pressing the present appeal

filed on behalf of the appellant and seeks permission to withdraw

the same.

In view of the submissions so made, the present

appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, signatures of Sh. N.K.

Srivastawa, learned counsel for appellant taken on the Original

Appeal itself towards the permission and endorsement of his

statement. Appeal accordingly stands disposed off.

Copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court.

The CA file be consigned to record room as per rules.

E copy of the order be supplied to the concerned parties.



09.09.2021

DDNo. 78A dated 09.09.2021PS Vasant Kunj (S)State Vs. Yogesh Verma @ Rinku ( SC No. 9128/2016, FIR No. 38/2015, PS : Sagar Pur )

Kalndra u/s 411( c) Cr.P.C

09.09.2021


Accused Yogesh Verma @ Rinku produced after his arrest

vide Kalandra proceedings u/s 41.1.( c) Cr.P.C by arresting officer H.C.

Pardeep Kumar No.483/SW P.S. Vasant Kunj (S) alongwith ASI Harphool

Singh submitting that accused was declared Proclaimed Offender in the

above mentioned case vide order dated 01.12.2018 by Sh. Rakesh Syal,

the then learned Sessions Court, and the matter is now pending before

the court of undersigned.

Sh. Suresh Sisodia, learned counsel for the accused filed

fresh vakalatnama. It be taken on record.

At this stage, an application u/s 439 Cr.P.C on behalf of

accused seeking bail is moved. Notice of the application be issued to IO

to file status report and application be put up for consideration on

15.09.2021.

It is stated that the regular matter of the accused is listed for

27.10.2021.

In facts, accused Yogesh Verma @ Rinku is remanded to

J.C and be produced by the Jail Supdt, physically, before the court of

undersigned on date already fixed in the matter i.e. 27.10.2021.

The present kalandra proceedings be attached with the main

case file.

Copy of orders be given through electronic mode.

The order be also uploaded on the official website of the

court.


09.09.2021


Bail application no. 1739/21Krishan Kumar Bansal Vs. CGST

09.09.2021


applicant / accused Krishan Kumar Bansal for grant of regular bail,

which is fixed for today.

Present : Sh. Saurav Aggarwal, Sh. Ashish Tiwari, Sh. Vibhu

Anshuman and Kavya Pahwa, learned counsels for the applicant/

accused Krishan Kumar Bansal.

Sh. Harpreet Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the

department.

Reply to the bail application has already been filed.

Arguments heard.

Re notify for orders on 10.09.2021 at 04.00 p.m.

E Copy of the order be provided to all the parties and be

given dasti.



NCB Vs. Fazal AhmadCase No. SC/119/2020

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Mukesh Malik, SPP for NCB through VC.

Accused produced from JC through VC.

Sh. S.A. Khan, Ld. LAC for accused through VC.

Case is today listed for prosecution evidence however due to

administrative instructions, PE could not be led hence witnesses are not

called. Accused has also not been produced today.

Accordingly, list this case for prosecution evidence on

10.11.2021. Jail superintendent is directed to produce accused on the said

date in accordance to prevailing administrative instructions of that day.

Copy of the order be sent to jail superintendent for

compliance.

Order be uploaded on Delhi District Court Website.

(Ajay Kumar Jain) ASJ/Spl. Judge NDPS

New Delhi/09.09.2021

NCB Vs. Yar Mohammad Noorzai Case No. SC/47/2020

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda, Ld. SPP for NCB through VC.


Sh A K Sahu, Ld LAC for accused through VC.








compliance.




NCB Vs. Yvonne Erica Gordon & Ors.Case No. SC/276/19

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda, SPP for NCB through VC.

Accused Yvonne Erica Gordon, Ikechukwu Bravo and Micheal

Mmadueke produced from JC through VC.

Sh A K Sahu, Ld LAC for accused Yvonne Erica Gordon

through VC.



called. Accused have also not been produced today.


09.11.2021. Jail superintendent is directed to produce accused persons on

the said date in accordance to prevailing administrative instructions of that

day.


compliance.




NCB Vs. Soleto Justiniano Fernando TitoCase No. SC/393/17

09.09.2021



Sh A K Sahu, Ld LAC for accused through VC.








compliance.




NCB Vs. Nympha De JesusCase No. SC/5/17

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda, SPP for NCB through VC.


Sh. Naman Joshi, proxy counsel for accused through VC.

Sh. Anubhav Singh, proxy counsel for Sh. Nitin Saluja, Ld.

LAC for accused through VC.








compliance.




NCB Vs. Peshawari Lal Case No. SC/8888/16

09.09.2021


Accused present on bail through VC.

Sh. Siddi Satyanarayana, Ld. Counsel for accused through VC.



called. Accused is also not present today.


15.11.2021.




FIR NO. 210/2019PS Spl Cell State Vs. Sanjeet Kumar Singh & Anr.Case No. SC/112/2020

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Ravindra Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC.

Both accused produced from JC through VC.

Sh. S.A. Khan, Ld. LAC for accused Pradeep Kumar Yadav

through VC.

Sh D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for accused Sanjeet Kumar Singh

through VC.





08.11.2021. Jail superintendent is directed to produce accused persons on

the said date in accordance to prevailing administrative instructions of that

day.


compliance.




CR No. 301/2018Amit Kumar Aggarwal Vs Dr Niyaz Rasool Siddiqui & Anr.

09.09.2021

Present: Sh Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. counsel for revisionist through VC.

Sh Pradeep Kumar, Ld. counsel for respondent through VC.

At request, last opportunity given for arguments to both the

parties.

List this revision petition for arguments on 18.09.2021.

Copy of the order be uploaded on the website of New Delhi

District.

(Ajay Kumar Jain) Spl. Judge, NDPS/N. Delhi

09.09.2021

SC No. 29/2019NCB Vs Ganesh Pun

09.09.2021

Present: Sh P C Aggarwal, Ld. SPP for NCB through VC.

Ms Sushma Sharma, Ld counsel for applicant/accused Ganesh

Pun through VC.

Ld. SPP submits that he has sent the reply however Ld.

counsel for accused submits that she has not received the copy of reply.

Ld. SPP undertakes to send again the copy of reply to the

counsel for accused through email.

List this application for reply and arguments on 15.09.2021.


District.


09.09.2021

Case No. VIII/10/DZU/2021NCB Vs Kapil Aggarwal & Ors.

09.09.2021

Present: Sh P C Aggarwal, Ld. SPP for NCB through VC.

Sh Vinay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant Vikas Aggarwal

through VC.

Ld. counsel submits that present applicant is not an accused

however filed an application for releasing the medicines seized by the NCB

upon false information.

Ld. SPP requested some time to file reply as verification of the

documents are required.

One last opportunity given for reply.

List this application for reply and arguments on 21.09.2021.

Copy of the order be sent to Director, NCB to ensure the filing

of reply by the said date.


District.


09.09.2021

CA No. 44/21Kamal Singh Gaur Vs Rajiv Batra

09.09.2021

Present: Ms Mani Mittal, Ld. counsel for appellant along with appellant

through VC.

Sh Prateek Singh Kundu, proxy counsel for respondent

through VC.

TCR already received.

Proxy counsel for respondent submits that main counsel is

today busy in physical hearing before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and

requested short adjournment.

Accordingly, list this appeal for arguments on 20.09.2021.


District.


09.09.2021

SC No. 05/2017NCB Vs Nympha De Jesus

09.09.2021

Present: Sh Rajesh Manchanda, Ld. SPP for NCB through VC.

Sh Anubhav Singh, proxy for Sh Nitin Saluja, Ld LAC for

applicant/accused Nympha De Jesus through VC.

Ld. LAC for accused submits that this is an application for

providing certified copy of chargesheet along with documents.

Ld SPP filed reply and submitted that copies have already

been supplied and his counsel is regularly appearing. There is no provision

for supply of certified copy by the NCB or court and for that purpose,

counsel can apply certified branch.

Accordingly, the present application is dismissed however

accused is at liberty to apply for certified copy in accordance to law.

Application disposed of.

Copy of the order be given dasti.


District.


09.09.2021

FIR No.PS U/s: State Vs

09.09.2021

Present: Sh Ravindra Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC.

At request, list this application for ___________.


District.


09.09.2021

NCB Vs. Deep ChandCase SC No. 213/19

09.09.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda Ld. SPP for NCB through VC.

Sh. Yogesh Saxena, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Deep

Chand through VC.

In compliance of the order dated 28.08.2021 report not

received from Jail.

Jail Superintendent is directed to file the report on the next

date i.e. 17.09.2021. Copy of this order along with order dated 28/08/2021

and copy of complaint be sent to Jail Superintendent to file the report.

List this application for filing of report on 17.09.2021.

Copy of order be uploaded on the website.


09.09.2021

Bail Matter No. 1795/21 FIR No. 61/21

PS Special Cell

State Vs. Rajiv Sharma U/s 419/420/467/468/471/474/120B IPC & 66D IT Act

09.09.2021

Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide order No. 569/RG/DHC/2021 dated

19.08.2021.

Ld. PO is on leave today.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. Substitute PP for the State through

VC. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Patel, counsel for applicant/accused

through VC.

At joint request, list this matter on 10.09.2021 before the

concerned court.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla

Link/ ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi

Roster Judge

09.09.2021


PS EOW

State Vs. Umesh Verma U/s 420/406/409/120B IPC

09.09.2021



19.08.2021.



VC. Sh. Raman Gandhi, counsel for applicant/accused through

VC.


concerned court.



Roster Judge

09.09.2021


PS Special Cell

State Vs. Pinki Devi U/s 419/420 IPC

09.09.2021



19.08.2021.



VC. Sh. Nirmal Kumar, counsel for applicant/accused through

VC.

There is some network issue. Counsel for applicant/accused is

not audible.

Therefore, list this matter on 10.09.2021 before the concerned

court.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla Link/ ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi

Roster Judge

09.09.2021


PS Special Cell

State Vs. Mohit Maan U/s 419/420/466/467/468/471/473/474/201/120B IPC & 66C/66D of

IT Act

09.09.2021



19.08.2021.


Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. Substitute PP for the State through VC.

Sh. Harpreet, counsel for applicant/accused through VC.


concerned court.



Roster Judge

09.09.2021

M No. 114/21 FIR No. 94/21

PS V K South

State Vs. Prakash Kumar U/s 394/411 IPC

09.09.2021



19.08.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC.

Sh. Vaibhav Kumar, counsel for applicant/accused through VC.

Applicant/accused was admitted to bail in the month of July.

However, he could not furnish any surety and therefore has continued to

remain in jail. This is an application for modification of bail condition.

In these facts and circumstances, amount of surety bonds

alone is reduced to Rs.1,000/-.

Application disposed off accordingly.

Order dasti.


ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi Roster Judge

09.09.2021


PS IGI Airport

State Vs. Mehboob Khan U/s 420/468/471 IPC

09.09.2021



19.08.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC.

Sh. Vinod Sharma, counsel for applicant/accused through VC. IO SI Sanjeev Chaudhary through VC.

It has been informed that mobile phone of the accused has

been seized and sent to FSL but the report may take considerable time. The

role of the accused may become clear only once FSL report has been

received.

In these circumstances, also considering that the courts have

not resumed 100% functioning in regular mode, accused is admitted to

interim bail for a period of 2 months on furnishing of bail bonds/surety

bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of like amount to the

satisfaction of concerned Ld. MM/Duty MM.

Application disposed off accordingly.

Order dasti.


ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi Roster Judge

09.09.2021

Ms. Gourisha Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for c - District Courts

Documents

Transcript of Ms. Gourisha Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for c - District Courts