Minutes of Technical Committee Meeting held on 31-01-2017

of 28

Minutes of Technical Committee Meeting

held on 31-01-2017

A meeting of Technical Committee (TCM) of the Board was held on 31-01-2017 at 11:00 am in the chairmanship of Hon’ble chairman, GPCB at the Committee Room of Gujarat pollution control Board, Gandhinagar. List of the members, officials and participants who remained present in the meeting is annexed herewith as Annexure A.

Agenda – 1 Case Related to CPCB Direction U/S 18(1)(b) 1. M/s Akash Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt.Ltd. Plot No. 409, GIDC Pandesara -

394221, Dist. Surat. The industry has submitted application to increase steam generation from 4.5 TPH to 7TPH. This case was resubmitted with the details of Steam Boiler, the matter was discussed in details. The boiler blow down as per details submitted is 2000lit/day and is proposed to be reused in process thus there shall be no additional discharge and no increase in production due to the changes in Boiler. After detailed deliberation the committee recommended to grant increase of steam generation from 4.5 TPH to 7TPH. The matter of CTE of Members of CETP- Gujarat Eco Textile Park Ltd. The representative of Gujarat Eco Textile –CETP made presentation before the Committee. The CETP results of last one year were presented before the committee. The results show that CETP is not meeting the norms prescribed mainly for BOD and COD. CETP is directed to upgrade and improve performance to justify the permission for new industrial discharge in the CETP. The CETP was also directed to comply with the condition of laying the pipeline for disposal of effluent at point recommended by NIO since discharge into Khadi is an interim arrangement. The following cases (2 to 5) were deferred till performance of CETP is improved and standards are complied as prescribed by the Board from time to time. 2. M/s. Saumya processors, Plot No. 1-2-3, Block No. 494, Nr. Salasar Dyeing,

palsana, Surat has made CTE-amendment application for production expansion with increase in wastewater which shall go to CETP.

3. M/s. Signet Denim Pvt. Ltd.Plot No. B-15, B-15-A,, Block No. 294, 296, Gujarat Eco Textile Park,Village-Baleshwar, DIST : Surat, TAL : Palsana. Surat has made CTE-fresh application for production of Denim cloth with proposal to send in wastewater to CETP.

4. M/s. Lalman Fashions Private Limited, Plot No.A26, Gujarat Eco Textile Park, Taluka Palsana - 394315, Surat has made CTE-fresh application for production of dyed yarn with proposal to send in wastewater to CETP.

of 28

5. M/s.Virat Threads, B20, Gujarat Eco Textile Park Ltd, NH-8, Palsana – 394315, Surat has made CTE-fresh application for production of dyed yarn with proposal to send in wastewater to CETP.

6. M/s. Varniraj Fabrics, Plot No. 56,57,58, Parekh Industrial Estate, Vibhag-3, Tantithaiya - 394305, Surat

This is a case of water jet weaving unit manufacturing grey fabrics. The waste water generated usually has oil and grease content and low COD content. The industry was sgranted CTE with mode of disposal as ZLD now the industry has proposed to send the wastewater to CETP –PEPL. Thus made CTE amendment for change in mode of disposal Considering the CPCB direction the committee suggested that if industry agree to meet disposed of COD=250mg/l may be permitted. The industry representative agreed to this suggestion and were also agreed to submit undertaking to this effect, in view of this committee recommended for grant of CTE with condition of Effluent Disposable Standards - COD 250mg/l from industry. At this Stage Committee has resolved that internal policy (SOPs) for all CETP maybe evolved within 30 days and then cases may be putup before the committee to decide application received related to modified CPCB Direction U/S 18(1)(b) for CETPs. 7. Nandesari Industrial Association (NIA), GIDC-Nandesari, Vadodara and their

member units M/s. Bharat Rasayan, Plot No. 22/1/B, GIDC Nandesari, Tal: Nandesari, Dist: Vadodara

Representative of unit M/s Bharat Rasayan was present and has made presentation for their project. This case is fresh CTE application. They proposed to manufacture CPC Green Pigment- 50MT/Month, where Industrial wastewater – 48KL/day will be generated, They will treat this effluent into ETP and treated wastewater will be reused and only 16Kl/day treated wastewater will be sent to NIA-CETP. Unit has obtained membership of NIA- CETP for 16KL/day. Unit has obtained EC vide letter No. SEIAA/Guj/EC/5(f)/506/2016 dtd. 30-07-16. Since the CETP representative was not present, the views of CETP for hydraulic load & improvement in performance of CETP could not be discussed. After detailed deliberation the Committee recommended to reject this application as

(1) CETP fails to certify that effluent from applicant industry will improve performance of CETP and it has a adequate hydraulic capacity to accommodate effluent of this industry.

(2) Applicant industry fails to submit details of generation & disposal of by products which are covered under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

of 28

8. M/s. Krishna Dairy, Plot No. 40, Phase-I, GIDC - Naroda, Ahmedabad ‐

382330.

The unit has applied for CTE Fresh. It is small scale Dairy product manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to manufacture Milk product/ Sweet barfi/Mavo/Milk Halva/Gulab Jamun- 100 MT/month.

Sr.

No. Products

Quantity

(MT/month)

1 Milk product / Sweet barfi / Mavo /

Milk Halva / Gulab Jamun 100.00

The table below shows the total water consumption as well as waste water generation scenario.

Sr. No. Category Water

Consumption

Waste Water

generation

1. Domestic 7.5 5.00

2. Industrial

Boiler/ Cooling tower 17.0 3.5

Washing 4.0 0.5

R.O Plant 24.0 0

Total Industrial 45.0 4.0

Water will be consumed from GIDC estate supply. Industrial wastewater 4.0 kL/d generated from Boiler and cooling tower blow down will be sent to CETP- NEPL, Naroda. R.O Reject water (7.2 kL/d) will be reused in Cooling Tower, Washing and Domestic purpose.

The representative of NEPL represented that they have recently installed an Anaerobic digester having capacity of 48 lakh liters against which they are receiving only 4.0 kL/d w/w from food industries. He further mentioned that after treatment in Anaerobic digester the quality of effluent will be within the inlet norms of CETP and its quality of biodegradability will be helpful to them to improve performance of CETP. After detailed deliberations NEPL the Committee recommend to grant CTE Fresh with conditions that NEPL shall submit an Undertaking clearly stating that CETP has adequate hydraulic capacity to accommodate present load and by allowing the intake of 4.5 kL/d effluent of this industry into CETP-NEPL, it will improve performance of CETP.

9. M/s. Jain Dairy Products, Plot No: 202 Phase- II, GIDC-Naroda,

Ahmedabad ‐ 382330.

The unit has applied for CTE Amendment. It is small scale Dairy product manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to manufacture following products.

Sr.

No.

Product Existing Quantity

(MT/month)

Proposed Quantity

(MT/month)

Total Quantity

(MT/month)

1. Paneer 120 180 300

of 28

2. Mava 20 55 75

3. Milk based sweets 3 27 30

4 Dahi /Shrikhand /

Mattho / Yogurt

300 600 900

5. Butter milk 30 270 300

6. Lassi 1 59 60


Sr.

No.

Breakup Water Consumption Waste water generation

Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total

I Domestic 1 4 5 0.8 3.2 4

II Industrial

a. Process

0.4 4.6 5 0 30 30

b. Boiler

0 15 15 0 2 2

c. Cooling

tower

0 10 10 0 3 3

d. Washin

g

6 31 37 14 31 45

Total Industrial 6.4 60.6 67 14 66 80

The representative from the industry represented that during manufacturing of paneer,

whey will be generated. Some part of this whey will be consumed in the manufacturing of

buttermilk and lassi. Remaining part will come out as wastewater. So the waste water

generation will be more w.r.t water consumption.

After detailed deliberations NEPL the Committee recommend to grant CTE Fresh with conditions that NEPL shall submit an Undertaking clearly stating that CETP has adequate hydraulic capacity to accommodate present load and by allowing the intake of 80 kL/d effluent of this industry into CETP-NEPL, it will improve performance of CETP. 10. M/s. Ambica Powder Coating Works, C-17, G. I.D.C. Matangi Transport Road,

Opp. Water Tank, Odhav, Ahmedabad - 381415. The unit has applied for CTE-Amendment for expansion and addition of new product which is shown in table below. It is as small scale industry engaged in powder coating on job work basis.

Sr.N. Products Existing

Quantity

Proposed

Quantity Total Quantity

1 Job work of powder

coating on CI/MS plates 12000 ft

2/month Nil 12000 ft

2/month

2 Job work of Zinc Plating 0 20 20

of 28


Sr. Category Water Consumption

(kL/d)

Waste Water generation

(kL/d)

EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL

1. Domestic 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.05 0.05 1.0

2. Industrial

Process 0.10 0.30 0.40 0.10 0.30 0.40

Washing 0.15 0.35 0.50 0.15 0.35 0.50

Total Industrial 0.25 0.65 0.90 0.25 0.65 0.90

The representative of OEPL(Odhav Enviro Project Ltd.)- represented that hydraulic capacity of OEPL is 1.6 MLD and consented hydraulic capacity is 1.2 MLD. Unit is having consent to send 0.25 kL/d waste water to CETP and proposes to send 0.90 kL/d after amendment. Unit is having membership of CETP- OEPL for the booked quantity 1.0 kL/d. The proposed quantity will improve the CETP performance as the waste water will be inorganic in nature and will not increase the hydraulic load of CETP. After detailed deliberation the Committee recommended to grant CTE-amendment for expansion with condition that (1) OEPL shall submit undertaking clearly stating that they have adequate hydraulic load to accommodate present load and by allowing to intake of 0.9Kl/day effluent from industry performance of CETP-OEPL will improve (2) Industry shall provide adequate ETP to treat zinc/heavy metal bearing effluent and treated effluent shall be discharged to CETP (3) ETP sludge shall be sent to active TSDF site.

of 28

Agenda – 2 Case Related to CTE-Change in Product mix case 11. M/s. Avik Pharmaceuticals Limited (Unit-II),Plot No- C1/B-26, Phase – I, GIDC

Vapi-369 195, Tal - Pardi, Dist -Valsad

Unit had applied CTE (Change of Product Mix) for:

Sr.

No. Product

Product Capacity (Kgs/Month)

Existing

Quantity

Proposed

Quantity

Total Quantity

after Product Mix

change

1. Testosterone IP/BP/USP/EP 125 - 125 0.00

2. Testosterone Propionate IP/BP/USP/EP 26 - 26 0.00

3. Testosterone Undeconate 30 - 30 0.00

4. Testosterone Deconate BP 30 - 30 0.00

5. Nandrolone Decanoate IP/BP 75 - 75 0.00

6. Nandrolone Phenyl Propionate

IP/BP/USP

50 - 50 0.00

7. Norethisterone

IP/BP/USP/EP

100 - 100 0.00

8. Norethisterone Acetate

BP/USP/EP

50 - 50 0.00

9. Methyl Testosterone

BP/USP/EP

25 - 25 0.00

10. 7 α Hydroxy Progesterone Caproate IP/USP 50 - 50 0.00

11. Dexamethasone ( DMS ) 0.00 + 275 275

12. Betamethasone ( BMS ) 0.00 + 51 51

13. Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate ( DSP ) 0.00 + 175 175

14. Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate ( BSP ) 0.00 + 20 20

15. Mometasone Furoate (MMF) 0.00 + 40 40

Total 561 0.000 561

In the meeting representative from the industry has made presentation with technical details for proposed productions with quantity of existing and proposed products, effluent generation, air emissions, and hazardous waste generation and its management to the technical committee members. The unit has stated that total existing quantity 561

of 28

KGs/Month remains same after proposed production. Existing products and new products are of the same group The unit has proposed that existing waste water generation will be remaining unchanged after proposed product mix change. There is no change in process and air emission. Thereafter due discussions, the committee recommended granting CTE with following conditions: (1) Unit shall submit an undertaking to improve recovery of solvent upto more than 90% (2) They shall send waste solvent generated after recovery for co-processing. (3) Unit shall follow spent solvent management guideline framed by the Board and shall

make MoU with offsite distillation units. Also submit the prescribed forms as per guideline.

(4) The unit shall obtain amendment to consent for the existing by products of the consent which are now classified as the hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

(5) The unit shall endeavour that end users industry to which the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 is given for use shall obtain permission under Rule- 9

12. M/s Rallis India Ltd, (PCB ID 15544), Plot No. 3301, GIDC Estate Ankleshwar,

Dist- Bharuch – 393002.

The unit had applied for CTE change in product mix. It is Pesticide Technical/Formulation manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to add 6 new products and increase in production capacity of one product by removing six existing products with the same overall consented production capacity i.e. 5900 MT/A. List of proposed change product mix is as under as per Table A. The project proponent made the detailed presentation with details of the existing and proposed products, water consumption details, wastewater generation details, details of existing wastewater treatment facility, details of manufacturing process, mass balance and other relevant technical details. The project proponent also presented that the new products added are from the fungicide family and has relatively low pollution potential than the products which are discontinued. The project proponent also presented the details regarding no increase in pollution load due to the proposed change. There shall be no change in water Consumption / Waste water generation. Existing utilities will be used. There will not be change in fuel or flue gas stack-emission. There will not be change in process gas stack-emission. There will not be any new plant & machinery installed due to proposed change in product mix.

Table - A PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST AFTER PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX

Sr.

No. Name Of Product

Total Capacity

existing

MT/Annum

Proposed changes

MT/Annum

Total capacity after

proposed product mix

change MT/Annum

(A) PESTICIDES TECHNICAL

1 CAPTAFOL OR 170 0 170

of 28

METRIBUZIN 60 0 60

2 THIOPHANATE – M OR 60 0 60

BROMUCONAZOLE 120 0 120

3 PROPICONAZOLE 200 0 200

4 BROMADIOLONE 0.1 0 0.1

5 CAPTAN/FOLPET 500 -500 0

6 DITHIANON 80 -80 0

7 METCONAZOLE/KRM 750 0 750

8 TEBUCONAZOLE 500 0 500

9 HEXACOANZOLE 500 +200 700

10 MEATALXYL 200 0 200

11 ACTAMIPRID 100 0 100

12 LAMDACYHALOTHRIN 200 0 200

13 KERSOXIM METHYL 300 0 300

14 IPCONAZOLE 200 0 200

15 AZOXYSTROBIN 300 0 300

16 TRIAZOLECONAZOLE FUNGISIDE 200 -200 0

17 METALAXYL-M 200 -200 0

18 IMIDACLOPRID 100 0 100

19 PHOSALONE 50 -50 0

20 TETRA CHLORO VINAYLPHOS

(TCVP) 250 0 250

21 TMOA 1000 -1000 0

22 PEKK 300 0 300

23 Amitrol (3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole 0 500 500

24 Difenconazole 0 200 200

25 Meta Phanoxy Benzaldehyde(MPBA) 0 200 200

26 Thiomethoxazam 0 200 200

27 Tricyclazole 0 300 300

28 Oxirane 0 430 430

TOTAL 5900 5900 5900 MT/A

Pesticide Formulations

of 28

SN Formulation Existing MT/A Proposed increase

(MT/A)

Total after Proposed

changes MT/A

1 Pesticide Formulation (Solid) 48000 0 48000

Pesticide Formulation (Liquid) 60000 0 60000

Total Quantity 108000 0 108000

SN Power Existing -MW Proposed increase -MW Total after Proposed

changes -MW

1 Captive Power Plant 1 1.064 MW 0 1.064 MW

2 Captive Power Plant 2 1.064 MW 0 1.064 MW

BYPRODUCT

1 CALSIUM CHLORIDE 1800 -1800 0

2 H

2SO

4 (50%) OR 500 OR 500

CALSIUM SULPHATE 830 -830 0

3 AMMONIUM SULPHATE 1440 -1440 0

4 SODIUM BROMIDE (AQ) 5000 +2000 7000

5 AMMONIUM CHLORIDE 660 -660 0

6 POTASSIUM SULPHATE 800 +400 1200

7 POTASSIUM CARBONATE 300 -300 0

8

ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE

(ALLUMINIUM CHLORIDE

SOLUTION)

1800 +2640 4440

9 AMMONIA LIQUIR 1050 +450 1500

10 SULPHURIC ACID (70%) 1000 -200 800

11 POTASSIUM BROMIDE 500 0 500

12 SODIUM IODIDE 500 -350 150

13 Sulphur 0 +40 40

14 Potassium Hydroxide 0 +50 50

TOTAL 14680 14680 14680

After detailed discussions the committee recommend to grant the CTE – change in product mix proposal with following conditions

(1) Unit shall follow spent solvent management guideline framed by the Board and shall make MoU with offsite distillation units. Also submit the prescribed forms as per guideline.

of 28

(2) The unit shall obtain amendment to consent for the existing by products of the consent which are now classified as the hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

(3) Unit shall make MOU with the industry to which its give its hazardous wastes as raw material / resource in its process & submit the copy of the same to the Board within 30 days.

(4) The unit shall endeavour that end users industry to which the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 is given for use shall obtain permission under Rule- 9 within six (06) month. Failing which, the unit shall treat its wastes fully for disposal in TSDF or bring to the notice of the Board which may be put up in TCM with explanation.

(5) The unit shall carry out audit of the end user industry to which its hazardous wastes is given for reuse & copy shall be submitted to the Board.

(6) The existing incinerator shall be upgraded to comply with CPCB guideline within 4 month.

(7) Industry shall install/mode operational(existing) online monitoring system in compliance with the CPCB guideline.

13. M/s Industrial Solvents & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, (PCB ID 15206), Plot No. 7906-7909, GIDC Estate Ankleshwar, Dist- Bharuch – 393002.

The unit had applied for CTE change in product mix. It is chemical manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to increase the production capacity of Dimethyl Para Toluidine and decrease the production capacity of N. N. Dimethyl Aniline. Both belong to the same chemical family. There will not be any addition of new product. Total Production capacity of organics products will remain 5142 MT/M. List of proposed change product mix is as under as per Table C. There will be no change in water consumption & waste water generation. Existing utilities will be used. There will not be change in fuel or flue gas stack-emission. There will not be change in process gas stack-emission. There is no change in hazardous waste quantity. There will not be any new plant & machinery installed due to proposed change in product mix.

Table C PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST AFTER PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX Sr.NO. List of Organic Product Code Production [MT/month]

Consented Proposed Total

1. Dimethyl Sulphate DMS 3000 0 3000

2. Diethyl Sulphate DES 500 0 500

3. N-Ethyl Aniline (NEA) NEA 100 0 100

4. Diethyl Aniline DEA 100 0 100

5. Ethyl Benzyl Aniline EBA 120 0 120

6. N,N-Dimethyl Aniline DMA 600 -70 530

7. N-Methyl Aniline NMA 20 0 20

of 28

8. Dimethyl Para Toluidine DMPT 30 70 100

9. Mono Ethyl Meta Toluidine&

Diethyl Meta Toluidine

MEMT

&DEMT

25 0 25

10. Absolute Alcohol Alc 100 0 100

11. Mono Methyl Meta Toluidine& Di

Methyl Meta Toluidine

MMMT&

DMMT

10 0 10

12. Methyl Benzyl Aniline MBA 10 0 10

13. Mono Ethyl Ortho Toluidine MEOT 10 0 10

14. Ether Solvents I.P./B.P ES 500 0 500

15. Ether Anaesthetic I.P/B.P EA 15 0 15

16. Ethyl Chloride I.P/B.P 2 0 2

TOTAL 5142 0 5142

Sr.N

O.

List of In Organic Product Code Production [MT/month]

Consented Proposed Total

17. Spent Sulphuric Acid [ 65% Min ] 800 0 800

18. Sulphuric Acid 70% 8000 0 8000

19. ChloroSulphonic Acid CSA 6000 0 6000

20. Sulphur Trioxide SO3

15750

0

15750 21. Sulphuric Acid

22. Oleum (65% &24%)

23. Sulphamic Acid 900 0 900

24. Non Ferric Alum 3000 0 3000

Total 34450 0 34450

Other

25. Captive Power Plant 2 MW [1MW

X 2nos.]

0 2 MW [1MW

X 2nos.]

26. Plastic Carboys [ Capacity 20-60 lit] 50000 0 50000

27. Plastic Barrels [Capacity 210-230 Lit] 30000 0 30000

28. M. S. Barrels/G I Barrels [Capacity

200-220 Lit ]

20000 0 20000

29. M.S. Drums [Capacity 20-100 Lit] 60000 0 60000

After detailed discussion the committee recommend to grant the CTE – change in product mix proposal with the condition of no increase in pollution load & with following conditions

(1) Unit shall follow spent solvent management guideline framed by board and shall make MoU with offside distillation units. Also submit the prescribed forms as per guideline.

(2) The unit shall obtain amendment to consent for the existing by products of the consent which are now classified as the hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

of 28

(3) Regular / Periodically maintenance shall be carried out by the unit to mitigate the corrosion effect.

(4) The unit shall endeavour that end users industry to which the Hazardous and

Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 is given

for use shall obtain permission under Rule- 9

(5) Online CEMS shall be installed in the major process vents and its data shall be hooked up to the server of the Board as per the CPCB guidelines.

14. M/s Wanksons Chemical Ind. Pvt. Ltd, (PCB ID 15873), Plot No.518, GIDC

Panoli, Dist- Bharuch – 393002.

The unit had applied for CTE change in product mix. It is Pesticide Technical/Formulation manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to change production capacity of four products. There will not be any addition of New Products. Production capacity of existing technical products will decrease from 286 MT/M to 283 MT/M. there will not be any change in formulation products. List of proposed change product mix is as under as per Table B.

The representative of the project proponent made the presentation. During presentation it was revealed that the deletion of the project that is made is single step chlorination product while the products added will be having more than one step. The omissions were also found in the manufacturing process details. Important steps like solvent washing in product 3 CPP were not shown. Moreover, in centrifuge process of the same product, the mother liquor stream was not shown.

Table B PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST AFTER PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX

Sr.

No. Product Name

Production Capacity in MT/Month

Existing as

per CTO

After Proposed

change in Product

mix

Remarks

1. Meta Chloro Propio Phenone (3-

CPP) 1 10

Increase in existing

capacity

2. Chloral 230 213 Decrease in existing

capacity

3. Dichlorovos Technical (DDVP-

Tech) 10 20

Increase in existing

capacity

4. PIA-4 (3-(bromo ethyl)-2-chloro-4-

(methyl sulfonyl) benzoic acid) 25 20

Decrease in existing

capacity

5. PIZ (S-benzyl O, O Di isopropyl

Phosphorothioate) 10 10 No change

6. Di Methyl Alcohol Hydrochloride

(DMA HCl) 10

(Either or)

10

(Either or) No change

7. Iso Propyl Alcohol Hydrochloride

(IPA HCl)

8. Methanolic Hydrochloride

of 28

Sr.

No. Product Name

Production Capacity in MT/Month

Existing as

per CTO

After Proposed

change in Product

mix

Remarks

Formulation Products

9. Fanvalrate 20% EC 100 100 No change

10. Chloropyriphos 20% EC 100 100 No change

11. Chloropyriphos 48% EC 100 100 No change

12. Cypermetherin 25% EC 100 100 No change

13. Monocrotophos 36% EC 100 100 No change

14. Cypermetherin 10% EC 100 100 No change

15. DDVP 76% EC (Dichlorovos) 100 100 No change

16. 2,4,D Ethyl Ester 38% EC 100 100 No change

17. Imida Chlopride 17.8% SL 100 100 No change

18. Methyl Parathion 50% EC 100 100 No change

19. Mancozeb 75% WP 75 75 No change

20. Acephate 75 % SP 75 75 No change

TOTAL 1436 1433

The project proponent is asked to submit the following details & represent their submission in next TCM:

(1) Details of existing & proposed raw material. Change in the quantum should be shown.

(2) Details of all type of waste –(i) waste water – quality and quantity of the each type of the stream of existing and after proposed change, (ii) Hazardous waste- Quantity and Quality of the existing and after proposed change.

(3) Spent acid generation and its management (Existing and after proposed change) (4) Spent solvent generation and its management (5) Details about existing & proposed distillation facility. (6) Details about in house catalyst recovery process. (7) Mass balance of each product. (8) Justification for not requiring of new plant and machinery (9) In 3 CPP product, details of the hexane use in centrifuge etc. are not shown,

moreover, the mother liquor stream generated from the centrifuge is also not shown. It was asked to re submit the correct details.

The case will be discussed in the next TCM subject to successful submission of the above details.

15. M/s Shiva Pharmachem Ltd, (PCB ID 34080), Plot No. Z-88, Z/88/4, DAHEJ SEZ PART–I, GIDC DAHEJ, TAL:VAGRA, Dist-Bharuch– 392130.

The unit had applied for CTE change in product mix. It is chemical manufacturing unit. The unit manufactures various Acid Chlorides, Alkyl Chlorides, Specialty chemicals and Active Pharmaceuticals ingredients. The unit has proposed to add new products within

of 28

the given quantum threshold. List of proposed change product mix is as under as per Table D. The project proponent made a detailed presentation in this regard. During presentation, it was revealed that the unit has asked for the Broad permission such as in Group Acid Chloride, unit has asked for the “Other Acid Chloride” similarly, for specialty chemicals and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, it has been proposed to manufacture “Other Specialty Chemicals” and “Other Pharmaceutical Ingredients”. The committee asked the project proponent to list all the chemicals intended to be manufactured under this head instead of open ended terms. It was also asked to submit the Worst Case Scenario for the proposed change in product mix. It was decided to reconsider the application in the next TCM after satisfactory submission of the above asked details.

Table D PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST AFTER PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX

LIST OF PRODUCTS ALONG WITH PRODUCTION CAPACITY: SR.

NO.

PRODUCT NAME EXISTING

QUANTITY

MT/YEAR

PROPOSED

QUANTITY

MT/YEAR

TOTAL

AFTER

PROPOSED

QUANTITY

Formulation product

1 Hexaconazole liquid formulation 1000 - 1000

2 Pretilaclohr liquid formulation 1000 - 1000

3 Propiconazole liquid formulation 1000 - 1000

4 Acid chlorides 18000 - 18000

5 Alkyl chlorides 6000 - 6000

6 Speciality chemicals & advance

intermediates

2000 - 2000

7 Active Pharma ingredients 1000 - 1000

8 Thionyl chloride 30000 - 30000

LIST OF PRODUCTS ALONG WITH PRODUCTION CAPACITY:

SR

NO

NAME OF PRODUCT PRODUCTION CAPACITY

MT/YEAR

1 ACID CHLORIDES-18000 TPA

1. Pivaloyl chloride

18000

2. Neodecanoyl chloride

3. 2-Ethyl Hexanoyl chloride

4. Valeroyl chloride

5. Isononanoyl chloride

6. Isobutyryl chloride

7. Isophthaloyl chloride

8. Terphthaloyl chloride

9. Phthaloyl chloride

10. Methoxy acetyl chloride

11. Octanoyl chloride

12. Heptanoyl chloride

13. Butyryl chloride

14. Cyclopropane carbonoyl chloride

of 28

15. 2,3-Dichlorobenzoyl chloride

16. 2,4-Dichlorobenzoyl chloride

17. Dithiodibenzoyl chloride

18. Undecanoyl chloride

19. Hexanoyl chloride

20. 2,2-Dimethylbutyryl chloride

21. Benzoyl chloride

22. p-Anisoyl chloride

23. Isovaleroyl chloride

24. Lauroyl chloride

25. Myristoyl chloride

26. Palmitoyl chloride

27. Cocofatty acid chloride

28. Oleoyl chloride

29. 3,5-Dimethyl benzoyl chloride

30. 3,5-Dichlorbenzoyl chloride

31. 3,5-Dinitrobenzoyl chloride

32. p-Toluyol chloride

33. 2-Methoxy benzoyl chloride



36. 2,6-Dimethoxy benzoyl chloride



39. 3-Chloro-2,6-Dimethoxy benzoyl chloride

40. 3-bromo-2,6-Dimethoxy benzoyl chloride

41. 3,4,5-Trimethoxy benzoyl chloride

42. 4-Acetoxy-3-methoxy benzoyl chloride

43. 2,4,5-Trifluorobenzoyl chloride

44. 3-Methoxy 2,4,5-Trifluorobenzoyl chloride

45. 2-Nitrobenzoyl chloride



48. 2-Chloro-4-Nitrobenzoyl chloride






54. 4-Methoxy-3-nitrobenzoyl chloride

55. 3-Methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl chloride

56. 2,4,5-Trifluoro-3-methyl-6-nitrobenzoyl chloride

OR

Pentenoyl chloride

57. 4-chloro-5-fluro-2-nitrobenzoyl chloride

OR

Chloro Acetyl Chloride

58. 3-Butoxy-4-nitrobenzoyl chloride

of 28

59. Decanoyl chloride

60. Chloro Pivaloyl chloride

61. 4-Chloro butyryl chloride

62. 2-Chloro nicotinoyl chloride

63. 2-Chloro propanoyl chloride

64. 2-Ethyl Butyryl Chloride

65. 2-Methyl benzoyl chloride

66. 3-Methoxy-2-methyl benzoyl chloride

67. p-Ethyl benzoyl chloride

68. Stearoyl chloride

69. Neoheptanoyl chloride

70. ATIPA dichloride

71. 2-Acetoxy Propionyl Chloride

72. Benzyl Sulphonyl chloride

73. 3,4-Dichlorbenzoyl chloride

74. 5-Chloro valeroyl chloride

75. Other Acid Chlorides

2 ALKYL CHLORIDES- 6000 TPA

1. n-Butyl Chloride (1 chloro Butane)

6000

2. iso Butyl Chloride (1 chloro Iso Butane)

3. n-Pentyl Chloride (1 chloro pentanes)

4. n-Hexyl Chloride (1 chloro Hexane)

5. n-Heptyl Chloride (1 chloro Heptane)

6. n-Octyl Chloride (1 chloro Octanes)

7. Cetyl Chloride

8. 2-Ethyl Hexyl Chloride (1 chloro 2 Ethyl hexane)

9. Decyl Chloride (1 chloro Decane)

10. Dodecyl Chloride (1 chloro Dodecane)

11. Neopentyl Chloride

12. 2-Propoxy Ethyl Chloride

13. Propargyl Chloride

OR

Chloropipol

14. 2-Methoxy Ethyl Chloride

15. L-2-Chloropropionic Acid Isobutyl Ester

16. Other Alkyl Chlorides

3 SPECIALTY CHEMICALS & ADVANCE INTERMEDIATES- 2000 TPA

1. Ethyl Hexyl Triazone

2000

2. Piroctone Olamine

3. 2-Phenylbenzamidazole-5-sulphonic acid

4. Isoamyl methoxy cinnamate

5. DimethylAmino Ethyl chloride Hydrochloride

6. DiethylAmino Ethyl chloride Hydrochloride

7. DimethylAmino Propyl chloride Hydrochloride

8. 3-DimethylAmino-2-Methyl Propylchloride

Hydrochloride

9. 2-Dimethyl Amino Propyl chloride Hydrochloride

10. Bis(2-Chloro Ethyl )Amine Hydrochloride

11. Di-p-Toluoyl-D-Tartaric acid ( Mono hydrate)

of 28

OR

2-Ethyl hexyl glycerine

12. Di-p-Toluoyl-L-Tartaric acid ( Mono hydrate)

OR

Tris biphenyl triazine

13. Di-Benzoyl-D-Tartaric acid (Mono hydrate)

OR

Iscotrizinol (HEB)

14. Di-Benzoyl-L-Tartaric acid (Mono hydrate)

OR

Bemotrizinol (BEMT)

15. Di-p-Anisoyl-D-Tartaric acid ( Mono hydrate)

OR

Ethylene glycol dibenzoate (EGDB)

16. Di-p-Anisoyl-L-Tartaric acid ( Mono hydrate)

OR

Octyl salicylate

17. Di-p-Toluoyl-D-Tartaric acid

OR

Octyl methoxy cinnamate

18. Di-p-Toluoyl-L-Tartaric acid (Anhydrous)

OR

Cloquintocet mexy

19. Di-Benzoyl-D-Tartaric acid (Anhydrous)

OR

2-Heptanol

20. Di-Benzoyl-L-Tartaric acid (Anhydrous)

OR

Cloquintocet acid

21. Di-p-Anisoyl-D-Tartaric acid (Anhydrous)

OR

4-Chloro-3,5-Dimethylphenol (PCMx)

22. Di-p-Anisoyl-L-Tartaric acid (Anhydrous)

23. Di-Acetyl-D-Trataric anhydride

OR

Diehtylhexyl butamido triazone (HEB)

24. Isopropyl-2-methoxy acetate

25. 4'-tert-butyl-4-chlorobutyrophenone

26. Chloromethyl isobutyrate

27. 4,4-Dimethoxy-2-butanone

28. 2-Amino-5-methyl pyridine

29. 4-Bromomethyl-2-cynobiphenyl

30. Sodium 2-Ethylhexanoate

31. 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropanamide

32. 5-Amino-2,4,6-Triiodisophthaloyl Dichloride

OR

CMNBP NITRIC SPENT

33. Trichlorocarbanilide

OR

3-methoxy-2-methyl benzoic acid (MMBA)

34. 4-methyl-2-cyano Biphenyl (OTBN)

of 28

35. 3-Amino-4-isobutylamino quinoline

36. 3-Amino-4-isobutylamino quinoline hydrochloride

37. (+/-)-3-(Carbamoylmethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid

38. R(-)-3-(Carbamoylmethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid

39. Benzoic acid, 2,4-dichloro-3-methyl-

40. 3-Quinolinecarboxylic acid, 7-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-

1,4-dihydro-8-methyl-4-oxo-ethyl ester

41. Zolpidic acid

42. Pipecolic acid 2, 6-xylidide

43. Chloromethyl butyrate

44. Chloromethyl pivalate

45. Cyclopropane carboxylic acid

46. Tetrahydrothiophene-1,1-dioxide (Sulfolane)

47. Other Specialty Chemicals

4 ACTIVE PHARMA INGREDIENTS -1000 TPA

1. Carvedilol

1000

2. Lamotrigine

3. Chlorthalidone

4. Ranolazine

5. Olmesartan

6. Trimetazidine

7. Iopamidol

8. Other active Pharma Ingredients

5 THIONYL CHLORIDE 30000

LIST OF BY-PRODUCTS ALONG WITH PRODUCTION CAPACITY

Sr. Name of By Products Production Capacity MT/Year

Co-Product

1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 12500

2 Hydrogen Chloride Gas 7000 (100% Gas) / 21000 (30 % w/w liq.)

3 Trityl Alcohol 10

The project proponent was asked to submit the following details & represent their submission in next TCM:

(1) Worst case scenario for Pollution load with respect to air, water, hazardous waste generation proposed.

(2) Undertaking to the effect that will manufacture specific products mentioned in application only without generated product.

(3) Details of all type of waste (waste water, hazardous waste etc.) generated from existing & proposed products.

The application will be considered in the next TCM after satisfactory submission of the above asked details.

16. M/s Borax Morarji Ltd, (PCB ID 29503), Plot No. CH/5 (OLD PLOT NO: CH-4), GIDC DAHEJ, TAL: VAGRA, Dist- Bharuch – 392130.

The unit had applied for CTE change in product mix. It is chemical manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to increase the production capacity of Dimethyl para toluidine and decrease the production capacity of N. N. Dimethyl Aniline. There will not be any addition of New Product. Total Production capacity of organics products will remain 5142 MT/M. List of proposed change product mix is as under as per Table E.

of 28

There will be no change in water consumption & waste water generation. Existing utilities will be used. There will not be change in fuel or flue gas stack-emission. There will not be change in process gas stack-emission. There is no change in hazardous waste quantity. There will not be any new plant & machinery installed due to proposed change in product mix.

Table E PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST AFTER PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX SR.

NO.

NAME OF PRODUCTS EXISTING

QUANTITY

(MT/MONTH)

ALTERNATE

QUANTITY

(MT/MONTH)

TOTAL AFTER

REVICED PRODCT

MIX

(MT/MONTH)

1. Boric Acid Powder/Granules 300 - 300

2. Boric Acid-CP Grade

Powder/ Granules 300

- 300

3. Boric Acid-IP Grade Powder 100 - 100

4. Boric Acid- AR

GradeGranules

50 - 50

5. Boric Acid –SQ Granules 100 - 100

6. Zink Borate Powder 100 - 100

7. DOT (Disodium Octaborate

Tetrahydrate) Powder 330

- 330

8. Injecta-II Powder (Oxalic

Borate) 20

- 20

9. Borax Decahydrate

PowderGranules 500

- 500

10. Borax Deca Crystals 200 - 200

11. Sulphonated Products 90 - 90

TOTAL-A 2090 - 2090

AND

12. Benzene Sulfonyl Chloride 600 - 600

OR

13. Benzenesulfonic Acid and

other sulfonic acid

- 60 MT 60 MT

OR

14. N-Phenyl Benzene

sulfoamide and other

sulfonamides

- 40 MT 40 MT

OR

15. Methane sulfonic Anhydride - 15 MT 15 MT

OR

16. Propargyl Chloride and other

Chlorides

- 30 MT 30 MT

OR

17. Diphenyl Sulfone and other

sulfones

- 25 MT 25 MT

OR

18. Di-hydroxy Di-Phenyl

Sulphone

- 55 MT 55 MT

OR

19. Sulphamic Acid - 75 MT 75 MT

of 28

OR

20. DPS

Purification(Phenylsulpfonyl

Benzene)

- 30 MT 30 MT

OR

21. Potassium TetraBorate - 40 MT 40MT

OR

22. WUDSAW(Di Sodium

Decaborate Decahydrate)

- 5MT 5MT

TOTAL-B 600 600

GRAND TOTAL

(TOTAL-A + TOTAL-B)

2690 2690

BY-PRODUCTS(ALSO LISTED UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTES)

1 Diphenyl Sulphone 10 - 10

2 Dilute Sulphuric Acid (68%) 312 - 312

OR

3 Dilute HCL (30%) - +48 48

Dilute Na2SO3 (20%) - +187 187

OR

4 Phosphoric acid - +5.595 5.595

AND

5 Gypsum 2,400 - 2,400

TOTAL 2722 - 2722

The project proponent was asked to submit the following details & represent their submission in next TCM:

(1) Worst case scenario for Pollution load with respect to air, water, hazardous waste generation proposed.

(2) Undertaking to the effect that will manufacture specific products mentioned in application only without generated product.

(3) Details of all type of waste (waste water, hazardous waste etc.) generated from existing & proposed products.

(4) Name of products in Sulphonated products shall be name specific. The application will be considered in the next TCM after satisfactory submission of the above asked details. 17. M/s.Torront Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Plot No.757 to 762, 764 to 768, 785, 788,

753 to 762, 112, 113, 113b, 114, 126, 128 to 130, 135, Ahmedabad-Mehsana Highway, Village-Indrad, Tal.Kadi, Dist.Mehsana

The unit had applied CTE change in product mix. It is a pharmaceuticals formulation and

bulk drugs (API) manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to add 34 new products and

existing quantity of some products will be reduced . List of proposed change products mix

is as under as per. Table A. Total production capacity will remain 58 MTPA.

There will not be increase in existing pollution load. Wastewater generation will be 955

KLD.

of 28

After detailed discussion the committee has recommended to grant CTE change of product mix subject to following conditions:

• Unit shall follow spent solvent management guideline framed by board and shall make MoU with offside distillation units. Also submit the prescribed forms as per guideline.

• Generated spent solvent shall be supplied to authorized actual users only and the

records of the same shall be maintained.

• Unit shall explore the possibilities to sending spent solvent in to for co- processing

as per waste management hierarchy

• Recovered/Mixed solvent shall be included in authorization into existing CCA as

per Hazardous wastes (Management and Handling) Rules-2016.

• The unit shall obtain amendment to consent for the existing by products of the

consent which are now classified as the hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous

and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

• The unit shall endeavour that end users industry to which the Hazardous and

Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 is given

for use shall obtain permission under Rule- 9

18. M/s. Vimal Crop Care Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 175/6, Phase-I, Opp. Ingersoll Rand, GIDC-Naroda, Ahmedabad.

The unit has applied for CTE Amendment. It is a small scale unit engaged in manufacturing of Pesticides (Technical). The unit has proposed to manufacture existing product along with new products shown in table below, which are not attracting EIA-2006 and doesn’t require EC.

Sr.

No. Products

Existing

Quantity

(MT/month)

Proposed

Quantity

(MT/month)

Total Quantity

(MT/month)

1 Copper Oxichloride 200 0 200

2 Copper Oxichloride WP 0 200 200

3 Copper Hydroxide WP 0 500 500

4 Copper Sulphate WP 0 500 500

5 Bordeaux Mixer WP 0 500 500

6 Bordeaux Mixer Salt 0 500 500

TOTAL 200 2200 2400

The committee found that the CTE-Amendment case was not in the purview of TCM and hence its details are not discussed in this meeting and Board may decide it administratively as per prevailing policy. 19. M/s. Ushanti Colourchem Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 88/7, Phase- I, GIDC Vatva,

Ahmedabad - 382445.

The unit has applied for CTE change in product mix. It is a medium scale Dyes and Dyes Intermediate manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to reduce 5MT/month existing

of 28

production of Reactive Turquoise Blue-H5G and H7G intermediate and proposed to manufacture following dyes and dyes intermediate without changing the existing total production quantity i.e.10 MT/month. There will be no increase in pollution load due to proposed change in product mix. There will not be any new plant & machinery installed.

Sr.

No. Products

Existing

Quantity

(MT/month)

Proposed

Product Change

Mix(MT/month)

Total Quantity

(MT/month)

1 CPC Blue 3 0 3

2 Reactive Turquoise Blue-

H5G and H7G 7 -5 2

3 Direct Turquoise Blue 0 2 2

4 Alpha Blue 0 1 1

5 Beta Blue 0 1 1

6 Reactive Turquoise Blue

72 (PGR) 0 1 1

Total 10 0 10

The table below shows the total water consumption as well as waste water generation scenario after change in product mix.

Sr.

No.

Effluent (Quantity in L/d) Existing

Scenario

Proposed

Scenario

1 Process effluent

2 (a) High Concentration 3270 3130

3 (b) Low Concentration 530 440

4 (c) Total (2+3) 3800 3570

5 Spent acid to NOVEL 400 320

6 Spent Acid reuse 800 1055

7 Effluent to CETP 2070 1755

8 Effluent from Boiler blow down and

Washing effluent

4550 4550

9 Total effluent to CETP (3+7+8) 7150 6745

As per the table above total effluent generated from the process due to product mix change will be 3570 L/d, out of which high concentrated w/w will be 3130 L/d an low concentrated stream of w/w will be 440 L/d. Out of high concentration w/w stream (i) 320 L/d of spent acid will be send to M/s. Novel Spent acid Management, Vatva (ii) 1055 L/d of spent acid will be reused in process again and (iii) 1755 L/d of w/w will be treated into ETP of the unit and will be send to CETP-Vatva for further treatment. The total w/w to be sent to CETP-Vatva will be 6745 L/d including Effluent from Boiler blow down and Washing effluent, low concentration stream. There are no changes in flue gas and process stack details.

of 28

The table below shows the total Hazardous waste scenario after change in product mix.

Sr.

No. Waste Existing Proposed Total Management

1 ETP Sludge 12

MT/month -1 MT/month

11 MT/month Collection, Storage,

Transportation, Disposal by at

TSDF

2 Used Oil 20 L/y - 20 L/y

Collection, Storage,

Transportation, Disposal by

selling to Registered rerefiners.

3

Discarded

Containers

180

nos./month

-90 nos./

month 90 nos./ month

Collection, Storage,


selling to authorized recycler.

Liners 6000 nos./

month

-3000 nos./

month

3000 nos./

month

Carboys 120 nos./

month

-60 nos./

month 60 nos./ month

5 Spent Acid 11 kL/month -2 kL/month 9 kL/month Collection, Storage, Treatment,


selling to actual end user

The CTE case was discussed in meeting. After detailed discussion the committee recommended to grant the CTE – change in product mix proposal with conditions, that Unit shall submit the Undertaking regarding break up/ water balance for Water consumption and waste water generation along with spent acid generation/ reuse/ disposal. 20. M/s. Legend Industries, Plot No. 478-479, Phase- II, GIDC- Vatva,

Ahmedabad. The unit has applied for CTE change in product mix. It is Bulk drugs manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to discontinue one of the existing bulk drug and proposed to manufacture two new bulk drugs without changing existing production quantity i.e. 3.5 MT/month. There will be no increase in pollution load due to proposed change in product mix.

Sr.

No. Products

Existing

Quantity

(MT/month)

Proposed

Product Change

Mix(MT/month)

Total Quantity

(MT/month)

1 Sulfa Cetamide Sodium

Salt 2.0 -2.0 0

2 Riboflavin Sodium

Phosphate 1.5 0 1.5

3 Ferrous Ascorbate 0 1.0 1.0

4 Calcium Citrate Malate 0 1.0 1.0

Total 3.5 0 3.5

of 28

The table below shows the total water consumption as well as waste water generation scenario after change in product mix.

Sr.

No.

Category Water Consumption

(L/d)

Waste Water generation

(L/d)

EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL

1. Domestic 1200 0 1200 1000 0 1000

2. Industrial

Process 870 0 870 1265 -500 765

Washing 3000 -400 2600 3000 -400 2600

Boiler &

Cooling 500 -500 0 100 -100 0

Other (Water

scrubber

attached to

spray dryer)

0 600 600 0 0 0

Total Industrial 5570 -300 5270 4365 -1000 3365

Unit will treat low concentrated stream of w/w in ETP units & after achieving GPCB norms will discharge it to CETP GESCSL, Vatva for further treatment and will send to Common MEE, GESCSL, Vatva. Unit proposes to install TFH and Spray dryer (Captive) for spray drying of final products. Cyclone separator followed by water scrubber and secondary scrubber will be used as APCM to Spray dryer. Unit proposes to use PNG (950 SCM/h) as fuel in TFH attached to spray dryer. Unit uses wood (10 MT/ month) as fuel in existing Baby Boiler. Process waste (Cat. 26.1) and Spent Carbon (Cat. 28.2) will not be produced and hence will decrease the Hazardous waste pollution load. Other Hazardous waste will remain same as per existing consent AWH- 52888. The CTE case was discussed in meeting. After detailed discussion the committee recommended to grant the CTE – change in product mix proposal with condition that Unit shall use Agro briquettes/ White coal as fuel in place of wood in Baby Boiler. 21. M/s. Orio Shanghai Colours Pvt Ltd, Plot No. 801/D-2, 801/E, Phase IV, GIDC

Naroda, Ahmedabad 382330.

The unit has applied for CTE change in product mix. It is small scale Dye manufacturing unit. The unit has proposed to discontinue existing Reactive and Acid dyes to manufacture proposed Reactive and Acid dyes with same production quantity i.e. 50 MT/month. In addition unit is engaged in manufacturing of S.O. Dyes 10 MT/month. The total production quantity after change in product mix remains 60 MT/month. There will be no increase in pollution load due to proposed change in product mix. There will not be any new plant & machinery installed.

of 28

Sr.

No.

Name of Product Quantity (MT/Month)

Existing Proposed Total

S.O Dyes

(Red, Brown, Blue Green,

Violet & Yellow)

10.0 - 10.0

1. Acid Brown – 335

50.0 -50.0 0.00



4. Acid Blue – 158

5. Reactive Blue – 19

6. Acid Blue – 25

7. Acid Orange – 142

8. Acid Yellow – 194

1. Reactive Black – B/WNN

- 50.0 50.0

2. Acid black 194/172

3. Acid Brown 425

4. Acid Brown 432

5. Acid Brown 161

6. Acid Black 210

7. Acid Brown 355

Total 60.0 0.0 60.0

There are no changes in existing water consumption and waste water generation details, flue gas and process stack details hazardous waste details after CTE-Change in product mix.

The CTE case was discussed in meeting. After detailed discussion the committee recommended to grant the CTE – change in product mix proposal with following conditions: (1) Unit shall provide Undertaking to the effect that they shall not manufacture any banned dyes with details of C.I. Index of all dyes products to be manufactured. (32) Unit shall use White coal/ Agro briquettes in place of Wood as fuel in Hot Air Generator (3) Unit shall use Coal only instead of Coal/Lignite as fuel in Steam Boiler and shall provide Water Scrubber as APCM to Steam Boiler in addition to Cyclone Separator. Agenda – 3 Case Related to EC

22. M/s. Gujarat Flurochemicals, Vill: Ranjitnagar, tal: Ghoghamba, Dist: Panchmahal.

Unit had applied for CTE-Product Mix Change. The total Production capacity including by products is as below.

Sr.

No.

Product Existing

Qty in

MT/Y

Proposed

Reduction

in Existing

Production

MT/Y

Proposed

New

Product

Addition

MT/Y

Final after

Proposed

Change

Product

Mix MT/Y

1 Monochloro Difluoro Methane

(HCFC-22)

18,000 -5,000 0 13,000

of 28

2 Difluro Methane (HFC-32) 500 0 2,500 3,000

3 Ethyl Difluroacetate(EDFA) 600 0 0 600

4 Bromo Trifluoromethane

(BTFM)

400 0 0 400

5 4-(Heptafluoroisopropyl)-2-

Methyl aniline/2-Bromo

Heptafluoro propane

400 0 0 400

6 2,5-Dichloro-4-

Hexafluropropoxy aniline

300 -300 0 0

7 Ethyl difluoroaceto

acetate(EDFAA)

600 0 0 600

8 Choloro difluoro ethane (R-142) 50 0 0 50

9 Ethyl tetrafluoroethyl

ether(ETFEE)

150 0 0 150

10 Penta Fluoro Phenol 120 0 0 120

11 4-Chloro-2-Trifluoro Acetyl

Aniline

1200 -700 0 500

12 R-410A 0 0 2,000 2,000

13 Methyl tetrafluoroethyl ether

(MTFEE)

0 0 250 250

14 Difluoro ethyl amine 0 0 100 100

15 Tetra Fluoro benzyl alcohol 0 0 60 60

16 TFA & its derivatives (ETFA) 0 0 100 100

17 2,6-Dichloro-4-Trifluoro methyl

aniline (DCTFMA)

0 0 250 250

18 2-Bromo-5-

Fluorobenzotrifluoride

0 0 100 100

19 Difluoro benzo phenone 0 0 250 250

20 TFE tetramer 0 0 50 50

21 HFP dimer 0 0 70 70

Total 22,320 -6,000 5,730 22,050

.

Sr.No. By Product Existing Qty in

MT/Y

Proposed after

Change Product Mix

MT/Y

1 Hydrochloric Acid(30±1) 70,000 71,060

2 Gypsum 46,800 46,800

3 Potassium Flouride(KF) 275 276.74

4 Silica (Sio2) 281 281

5 HBr(45%) 675 675

6 H2SiF6 (20-23%) 2,213 2,213

7 Potassium Chloride(KCl) 525 808.26

8 NaBr(Solution) 25 86.1

9 Potassium Ethoxide / Ethanolic-KOH

Solution

493 493

of 28

10 Sulfuric Acid 521 921

11 Potassium Mehoxide Liquid 0 32.09

12 Toluene 0 114

13 Dilute Hydrogen Fluoride 0 62

14 Potassium Bisulphate 0 70

15 Zinc Chloride 0 93

16 Recovered Ethanol 0 20

Total 1,21,808, 1,23,995

Representative of the unit made presentation with the technical details of proposed products with quality, Effluent generation, Air emission, hazardous waste generation to the technical committee members and has informed that overall Pollution load shall not increase (Schedule 1 Auditor Certificate attached with application) After detailed discussion the committee has recommended to grant CTE for product mix change subject following condition.

1. The unit shall install scrubber attached to boiler having Imported coal as a fuel. 2. The unit shall amend existing CCA for haz waste category, where By products falls

under the haz waste. 3. Unit shall rectified the product name TFA & ETFA instead of TFA & Its derivatives

(ETFA) in the product list.

of 28

Annexure - A

The meeting of the Technical Committee (TCM) held on 31-01-2017 at 11:00 AM in the Committee Room, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar. Under the Chairmanship of Hon’ble Chairman, GPCB.

Sr. No. NAME

DESIGNATION

1 Shri. Arvind Agrawal, IAS Chairman

2 Shri K. C. Mistry Member Secretary

3 Shri B. R. Naidu Member

4 Prof. J.N. Joshi Member

5 Dr. P. A. Joshi Member

6 Dr. Bharat Jain Member

7 Prof. H.R. Shah Invitee Member

8 Smt. Huma Sayad Invitee Member

9 Prof. M.G. Desai Invitee Member

10 Shri K. C. Mistry Unit Head, Mehsana,

Vadodara

11 Shri P. J. Vachhani Unit Head, Godhra

12 Smt. D.P. Shah Unit Head, Vapi

13 Shri D.M. Thakar Unit Head, Ankleshwar &

Bharuch

14 Smt. U. K. Upadhyay Unit Head, Surat

15 Shri A.V. Shah Convener & Member

Minutes of Technical Committee Meeting held on 31-01-2017

Documents

Transcript of Minutes of Technical Committee Meeting held on 31-01-2017