LegalMetric Individual Judge Report

This report contains confidential and proprietary information of LegalMetric, Inc. Use of this information by anyone other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, or disclosure of this information to persons other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, without the consent of LegalMetric, Inc. is prohibited.

The information contained in this report is obtained from the official docket records of the federal courts. No attempt has been made to correct that data. For example, cases may be misclassified in the official docket records. In addition, cases are classified only by the primary cause of action. Cases having multiple causes of action are analyzed only under the primary cause of action identitied on the official court docket.

LegalMetric, Inc. is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and is not engaged in the practice of law. No attorney-client relationship exists between LegalMetric, Inc. and any user of its products. LegalMetric provides statistical and analytical information to anyone who desires to purchase that information. Any purchaser of LegalMetric products who wants legal advice should hire an attorney.

LegalMetric Individual Judge ReportJudge Sue Lewis Robinson

Patent CasesJanuary 2000 to September 2017

1

Overview: Total Cases and JudgmentsJudge Robinson was appointed to the bench on November 18, 1991. This judge has been assigned 1408 patent cases. Of these, 1388 cases have been terminated. There have been judgments in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in 201 case(s). The patent owner prevailed in 42.5% of these cases (while the accused infringer prevailed in 57.5% of these cases). (Note: In those instances where the judge previously served as a magistrate, earlier rulings issued while the judge was a magistrate are included in this report.)

Nation Robinson

Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win RatePendency (All Cases)Judgment PendencyContested PendencyTrial Pendency

53.522.063.112.321.527.137.5

42.531.254.515.026.930.936.4

Total

Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win RatePendency (All Cases)Judgment PendencyContested PendencyTrial Pendency

42.531.254.515.026.930.936.4

Color Scheme: Red in the table above indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the national average, or a pendency time at least 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Yellow indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Bright (lime) green indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months FASTER than the national average. And dark green indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time over 6 months FASTER than the national average.

The number of patent cases assigned to Judge Robinson by year is shown in the chart to the right. Note that this includes cases filed in previous years and reassigned to this judge, where applicable.

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

2000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

20092010

20112012

20132014

20152016

2017

40

2135 31 34 40 39 38 41

47

6761

96

260

238

197

83

34

6

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Number of Cases Filed, by Year

2

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

2000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

20092010

20112012

20132014

20152016

2017

014

30 32 34 37 38 33 3949

28

6775

106

206

287

187

89

37

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Number of Cases Decided, by YearThe number of patent cases decided by Judge Robinson by year is shown in the chart to the left. This can include cases decided earlier which are subsequently assigned to this judge for post-decision rulings.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Wilmington

16.0

2.2

Cases Filed in Last FiveYears

Cases Filed in Last Year

Court

Perc

en

tag

e o

f T

ota

l C

ases F

iled

One- and Five-Year Percentage of Cases for This Judge Fraction of Cases Assigned to This Judge, By Court: The fraction of cases assigned to this judge by court (and division if applicable) is shown in the chart to the left and in the table below. The figures are further broken out by percentage of cases filed in the previous five years and by percentage of cases filed in the previous year.

Total

Percentage of Cases Filed in Last Five Years

Percentage of Cases Filed in Last Year

Total 16.0 2.2

Wilmington 16.0 2.2

3

Patent Case Outcomes for Judge Robinson: The chart below shows the breakdown, by case outcome, for closed cases of this judge.

0.4%Bankruptcy Stay

2.9%Bench Trial

0.1%

Confirmation ofArbitration Award

3.4%Consent Judgment

4.4%Consolidated

1.7%Involuntary Dismissal

0.1%

Judgment as a Matterof Law

2.7%Jury Verdict

1.6%Lack of Jurisdiction

0.6%MDL Transfer

73.7%Voluntary Dismissal

1.9%Want of Prosecution

Case Outcomes for Judge

Total

Total 1388

Bankruptcy Stay 6

Bench Trial 40

Confirmation of Arbitration 1

Consent Judgment 47

Consolidated 61

Involuntary Dismissal 23

Judgment as a Matter of L 1

Jury Verdict 37

Lack of Jurisdiction 22

MDL Transfer 9

Other Settlement 3

Other Termination 15

Remand to State Court 2

Summary Judgment 48

Transfer 23

Voluntary Dismissal 1023

Want of Prosecution 27

4

Overview: Contested JudgmentsThere have been 154 contested judgments in these cases (does not include consent and default judgments). The patent owner prevailed in 31.2% of these cases, while the accused infringer prevailed in 68.8% of these cases. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below. In addition, the patentee contested win rate for the judge by year is shown in the second chart below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Patent Owner Accused Infringer

22.0

78.0

31.2

68.8

NationRobinson

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Contested Win Rates, Judge v. Nation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2000

2,00

1.00

2002

2,00

3.00

2004

2,00

5.00

2006

2,00

7.00

2008

2,00

9.00

2010

2,01

1.00

2012

2,01

3.00

2014

2,01

5.00

2016

2,01

7.00

Year of Decision

Co

nte

ste

d W

in R

ate

(P

erc

en

tag

e)

Contested Win Rate by Year

5

Overview: TrialsThere have been 77 terminations by trial in these cases (includes both bench and jury trials). The patent owner prevailed in 54.5% of these case, while the accused infringer prevailed in 45.5% of these cases. Trials on which judgment has not been entered are not included in these figures. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Patent Owner Accused Infringer

63.1

36.9

54.5

45.5

NationRobinson

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Trial Win Rates, Judge v. Nation

6

Patentee Win Rates: By Nominating President: The number of patent cases in this district assigned toactive judges and the win rates for those cases are shown below, broken out by the nominating president.

2,997Barack Obama

1,492George Bush

11George W. Bush

1,831William J. Clinton

Barack Obama 47.3%George Bush 23.6%George W. Bush 0.2%William J. Clinton 28.9%

Total: 100.0%

Number of Cases - by Nominating President Number of Cases: The number of cases assigned to active jduges in this district is shown in the chart to the left, broken out by nominating president. This includes all cases of the type covered by this report.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Barack Obama George Bush George W. Bush William J.Clinton

Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win Rate

Pla

inti

ff P

erc

en

tag

e o

f C

as

es

Wo

n

Win Rates by Nominating PresidentPatentee Win Rates: The win rates for these cases, broken out by nominating president, are shown in the chart to the right. This includes overall win rates (includes consent and default judgments), contested win rates (does NOT include consent and default judgments), and trial win rates (cases decided by bench trial or jury verdict).

Total

Overall Win Rate

# of Judgments

Contested Win Rate

# of Contested Judgments

Trial Win Rate

# of Trial Jugements

Barack Obama 45.6 296 36.1 205 68.6 70

George Bush 44.0 224 32.7 171 55.4 83

George W. Bush 0 0 0

William J. Clinton 58.2 176 43.4 91 62.5 52

7

Overview: Markman RulingsThere were 116 Markman/claim construction rulings in these cases, not counting rulings made in connection with summary judgment motions. The average time from case filing to Markman rulings was 25.6 months. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Markman/Claim Construction section below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

JudgeNation

Mo

nth

s f

rom

Ca

se

Filin

gAverage Time to Markman Decision

Overview: Summary JudgmentThere were 492 summary judgment rulings on contested motions in these cases. The win rate on these contested motions was 35.4%. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Summary Judgment Motion section below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

JudgeNation

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Contested Summary Judgment Win Rates, by Year

8

Overview: Stay Pending Reexamination and Stay Pending Inter Partes ReviewThe win rate on motions to stay pending reexamination and on motions to stay pending Inter Partes Review for this judge are shown in the chart and table below. The table also includes the number of such motion decisions. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Stay Motion section below.

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Judge Stay PendingReexamNation Stay PendingReexam

Judge Stay Pending IPR

Nation Stay Pending IPRPe

rce

nta

ge

Contested Stay Pending Reexam Win Rates, by Year

Total

Stay Pending Reexam Win Rate

# of Stay Pending Reexam Decisions

Stay Pending IPR Win Rate

# of Stay Pending IPR Decisions

Total 32.4 17 33.3 6

2009 0.0 1 0

2010 50.0 2 0

2011 16.7 3 0

2012 0.0 2 0

2013 0.0 1 0

2014 66.7 3 33.3 3

2015 0.0 2 33.3 3

2016 50.0 2 0

2017 100.0 1 0

9

Overview: Time to Disposition-All CasesThe average time from case filing to case disposition by Judge Robinson is 15.0 months. The distribution of case terminations by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3334 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Clo

se

d C

as

es

Distribution of All Closed Cases

Overview: Time to Disposition-Cases with JudgmentsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by judgment in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in these cases is 26.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

0123456789

1011121314151617181920

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Clo

se

d C

as

es

Distribution of Cases Closed by Judgment

10

Overview: Time to Disposition-Contested JudgmentsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by contested judgment (does NOT include consent and default judgments) in these cases is 30.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

0123456789

1011121314151617181920

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 4243 44 45 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Clo

se

d C

as

es

Distribution of Cases Closed by Contested Judgment

Overview: Time to Disposition-TrialsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by trial (includes bench and jury trials) in these cases is 36.4 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

55.5

66.5

77.5

88.5

99.510

10.511

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 3334 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Clo

se

d C

as

es

Distribution of Cases Closed by Trial

11

Case Outcomes with Judgments:The win rates for patent owners and accused infringers by various outcomes are shown below. Details for each outcome are set forth in the following sections of the report.

Patentee Win Rate Accused Infringer

Total 42.5 57.5

Bench Trial 42.5 57.5

Confirmation of Arbitration Award 0.0 100.0

Consent Judgment 79.8 20.2

Involuntary Dismissal 8.7 91.3

Judgment as a Matter of Law 0.0 100.0

Jury Verdict 67.6 32.4

Other Termination 25.0 75.0

Summary Judgment 6.3 93.8

0

20

40

60

80

100

Bench

Tria

l

Con

firm

ation

of

Arbitr

ation

Awar

d

Con

sent

Jud

gmen

t

Invo

lunt

ary

Dism

issal

Judg

men

t as a

Mat

ter o

f Law

Jury

Ver

dict

Oth

er T

erm

inat

ion

Summ

ary

Judg

men

t

42.5

0.0

79.8

8.7

0.0

67.6

25.0

6.3

57.5

100.0

20.2

91.3

100.0

32.4

75.0

93.8

PatenteeAccused Infringer

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Case Win Rates, by Outcome

12

Bench Trial

There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Bench Trial

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyBayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al

1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 33.1

Kao Corporation, et al v. Unilever U S Inc., et al


Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al


Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical


Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corporation, et al

1:03cv00848 Bench Trial Patentee 22.7

Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI Inc., et al


Bayer AG, et al v. Dr. Reddy's Lab.Ltd., et al


In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation


Vanderbilt University v. ICOS Corporation


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.

1:06cv00033 Bench Trial Both 26.4

Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


Cancer Research Technology Limited v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al


Bench Trial


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency

Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al


Biacore AB, et al v. Thermo Bioanalysis


Clontech Labs Inc. v. Invitrogen


Union Carbide Chem, et al v. Shell Oil Company, et al


Genetics Institute LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc.


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Eurand Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.


Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.


Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Bench Trial


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCephalon Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Eurand, Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al


Eurand Inc et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc et al


In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation

1:09md02118 Bench Trial Both 17.3

Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al


Intendis GmbH et al v. Glenmark Generics Limited et al


Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. et al


Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al


Orexo AB et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC


Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Bench Trial


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyEndo Pharmaceuticals Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc.


Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC


16

Confirmation of Arbitration Award

There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Confirmation of Arbitration Award. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 68.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Confirmation of Arbitration Award

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCordis Corporation v. Medtronic Vascular

1:00cv00886 Confirmation of Arbitration Award

Accused Infringer 68.2

17

Consent Judgment

There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Consent Judgment

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyJupiter Media Metrix v. PC Data Inc

1:00cv00874 Consent Judgment Patentee 5.8

Original Creatine v. Twin Laboratories


Emulex Corporation v. Qlogic Corporation


Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al v. Pharmaceutical Inc., et al


Versus Technology v. Radianse Inc.


Item Development AB et al v. SICOR Inc. et al


King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc. et al v. SICOR Inc. et al


MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al


CooperVision Inc. v. CIBA Vision Corporation


Block Drug Company, Inc. v. Sedona Laboratories Inc.


3M Innovative Properties Company et al v. Assuretec Systems Inc.


Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment Patentee 13.4

MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al


MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.


18

Consent Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyKenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation


Cytyc Corporation v. Autocyte Inc.


WebXchange Inc. v. Allstate Corporation et al

1:08cv00131 Consent Judgment Both 1.8

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al


Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.


Streamlight, Inc. v. 221B Resources LLC


Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Congoleum Corporation


Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation et al


Belden Inc. v. Superior Essex Inc. et al


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.



1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 19.7

Depomed Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. Florida et al


Astellas US LLC et al v. Hospira Inc.


19

Consent Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAstellas US LLC et al v. Akorn Inc.


Astellas US LLC et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC


Depomed Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Google Inc. et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Disney Online et al.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Vevo LLC


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Viacom International Inc.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc.


Poly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.


Cephalon Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL Inc. et al


Janssen Products LP et al v. Cipla Ltd. et al


20

Consent Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAstellas US LLC et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC


Janssen Products LP et al v. Cipla Ltd. et al


Tervis Tumbler Company, Inc. v. Coleman Company Inc. et al


Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.


Dragerwerk AG & Co. KGaA et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.


Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al


Lupin Atlantis Holdings S.A. v. InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc.


21

Involuntary Dismissal

There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

8 9 10 11 17 18

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Involuntary Dismissal

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyIntersil Corporation, et al v. Proxim Inc.

1:01cv00266 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.2

Ellenby Technologies, et al v. AT Systems Inc., et al


Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al


Vermeer Manu. v. Deere & Company

1:04cv01343 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 9.9

Time Warner Cable Inc. v. USA Video Technology Corp.

1:06cv00387 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 16.5

Brinkmeier v. BIC Corporation et al


Brinkmeier v. Bayer Healthcare LLC




McDowell v. USA et al 1:12cv01302 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.9

Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc.


22

Involuntary Dismissal

There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

8 9 10 11 17 18

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Involuntary Dismissal

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyVehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc.


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc.


Goodman Manufacturing Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation


Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al


Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank et al


Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC Bank N.A.


Parus Holdings Inc. v. SunTrust Bank et al


Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Lexmark International Inc


Device Enhancement LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.


23

Judgment as a Matter of Law

There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Judgment as a Matter of Law. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 84.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Judgment as a Matter of Law

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al

1:98cv00197 Judgment as a Matter of Law

Accused Infringer 84.6

24

Jury Verdict

There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

2

4

6

8

10

13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Jury Verdict

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyEaton Corporation v. Parker-Hannifin Corp

1:00cv00751 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 34.1

Intel Corporation v. Broadcom Corporation


Stambler v. RSA Security Inc., et al


Elster Electricity v. SchlumbergerSema Inc

1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict Both 28.2

Intuitive Surgical, et al v. Computer Motion Inc.

1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict Patentee 20.4

ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., et al


Symbol Technologies v. Proxim Inc.


Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al


Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al

1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Both 56.3

Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion Wireless, et al


IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et al


TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation


McKesson Automation Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG et al


Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company


25

Jury Verdict


0

2

4

6

8

10

13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencySiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.


Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al


TA Instruments, et al v. Perkin - Elmer Corp.


C R Bard Inc v. Medtronic, Inc


Cordis Corporation, et al v. Advanced Cardio Sys, et al


Arterial Vascular, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al


Boston Scientific, et al v. Johnson and Johnson, et al


Abbott Cardio Sys, et al v. Medtronic Vascular, et al


Pechiney Rhenalu v. Alcoa Inc.


MLMC Ltd. v. Airtouch Comm Inc., et al


Scimed Life Systems, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al


SOITEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc.


Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp


Jury Verdict


0

2

4

6

8

10

13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAsahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. Guardian Industries Corp.


ArcelorMittal France et al v. AK Steel Corporation et al


Ironworks Patents LLC v. Apple Inc.


Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation


Vehicle IP LLC v. Werner Enterprises Inc.


Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC


INVISTA North America S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al


SRI International Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et al


27

Other Termination

There was/were 4 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The patentee win rate was 25.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 75.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 35.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

13 18 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Other Termination

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyHousey v. Abbott Pharm Corp., et al

1:01cv00401 Other Termination Accused Infringer 17.4

Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al

1:03cv00283 Other Termination Patentee 54.4

Medtronic Vascular v. Boston Scientific, et al


Stephenson v. Game Show Network LLC et al


28

Summary Judgment

There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Summary Judgment

The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAugustine Medical v. Mallinckrodt Med Inc, et al

1:01cv00387 Summary Judgment Patentee 22.2

Izumi Products Co v. Koninklijke Philips, et al

1:02cv00156 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.1

Toshiba Corporation v. Juniper Networks, et al


Monsanto Company, et al v. Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al


SRI International v. Internet Security, et al


LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & Body Works, et al


Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al


Automated Transactions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al


Nuance Communications Inc. et al v. Tellme Networks Inc.


IGT v. Bally Gaming International Inc. et al


Oracle Corporation et al v. Parallel Networks LLC


Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.


Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.


Wellman Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Company


Summary Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyBoston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al


Accenture Global Services GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc.


Manchak v. Chemical Lime Co., et al




Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al


Autocell Laboratories Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.




Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al


Helicos Biosciences Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc


Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm Foods Inc.


Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.


Apeldyn Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al


Motivation Innovations LLC v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc.


30

Summary Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyTechnology Innovations LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al


Cradle IP LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.


Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun Products Corporation


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc.


YYZ LLC v. Hewlett Packard Company


Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc.


Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al


YYZ LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.


YYZ LLC v. Pegasystems Inc.


ArcelorMittal et al v. AK Steel Corporation


ArcelorMittal France et al v. Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al


31

Summary Judgment


0

1

2

3

4

5

4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s


The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyPoly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.


Cloud Satchel LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.


Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes Noble Inc.


Motivation Innovations LLC v. PetSmart Inc.


Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated


BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.


Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc.


Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Cokebusters USA Inc.


32

Case Outcomes with No Judgments in Favor of a Party:The cases terminated without a judgment in favor of a party are identified below, including the distribution of those outcomes by month of litigation.

Bankruptcy Stay

There was/were 6 case(s) terminated by Bankruptcy Stay. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 8.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1 2 4 10 13 21

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Bankruptcy Stay

The supporting data is shown below.

Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

FreeMarkets Inc. v. PurchasePro.com Inc., et al

1:02cv00162 12.7Bankruptcy Stay

British Telecomm. v. Touch America


Lancaster Composite v. Hardcore Composites


Denso Corporation v. Delphi Corporation et al


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Journal Register Company


E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. SunEdison, Inc. et al


33

Consolidation

There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation



Scimed Life Systems, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al

1:00cv00404 8.7Consolidation

Informix Software v. Intl Bus Machines


Genzyme Corporation v. Genentech Inc.


FreeMarkets Inc. v. B2eMarkets Inc.


FreeMarkets Inc. v. Procuri Inc.


Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals


Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Impax Laboratories


Tenneco Operating v. Visteon Corporation


DeKalb Genetic Corporation v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. et al v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. et al


Internet Security Systems, Inc. v. SRI International


Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. et al v. Alphapharm Pty Ltd.


34

Consolidation


0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Intermec Technologies Corp.


Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.


Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al


Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al




Elan Corporation PLC v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al


Elan Corporation PLC et al v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC


Elan Corporation PLC et al v. Barr Laboratories Inc.


Luv N Care Ltd. v. Bamed AG


Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Vurv Technology Inc.


Ethypharm S.A. v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Novartis Corporation et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al


35

Consolidation


0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s








Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Eurand Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.


Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.


Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al




Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sandoz Inc.




Apeldyn Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc.


36

Consolidation


0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc.




Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC. et al


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Mylan Inc. et al


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.


Forest Laboratories, LLC et al v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals LLC et al


Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01349 1.6Consolidation



Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.


Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al


Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. et al

1:15cv00960 13.8Consolidation37

Consolidation


0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


38

Lack of Jurisdiction

There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Lack of Jurisdiction



PE Corporation, et al v. Affymetrix, Inc.

1:00cv00629 14.8Lack of Jurisdiction

DuPont Dow Elastomer v. Greene Tweed of DE


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al




Innovative Therapies Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al


Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron LLC


Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al


Edmunds Holding Company et al v. Autobytel Inc.


Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Wall Cardiovascular Technologies LLC


Andrew LLC v. TruePosition Inc.


Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc. et al


Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.


Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc.


Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc.

1:12cv00142 16.4Lack of Jurisdiction 39

Lack of Jurisdiction

There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Lack of Jurisdiction



Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc.


NCR Corporation v. Automated Transactions LLC et al


Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. v. Automated Transactions LLC et al


Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.


Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Company L.P.


Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Company L.P.


DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNA et al


40

MDL Transfer

There was/were 9 case(s) terminated by MDL Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 4.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor MDL Transfer



Laughlin Products v. Chisholm, et al

1:02cv00582 6.7MDL Transfer

Laughlin Products v. Johnson, et al


Astrazeneca AB, et al v. Eon Labs Inc.


Agfa Corp., et al v. Compression Labs Inc, et al


AstraZeneca AB, et al v. Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al


Yahoo Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc, et al


Audiovox Corporation, et al v. Compression Labs Inc, et al




Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al


41

Other Settlement

There was/were 3 case(s) terminated by Other Settlement. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 27.4. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

19 30 35

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Other Settlement



British Telecomm. v. Level 3 Comm Inc., et al

1:03cv00530 18.2Other Settlement

LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar Inc.


LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar Inc.


42

Other Termination

There was/were 11 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 22.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

6 14 17 21 30 42 45

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Other Termination



Ferring BV v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al

1:04cv00884 41.9Other Termination

Lingamfelter v. Coca-Cola Enterprise, et al


Guardian Industries v. Dell Inc., et al


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al


Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:10cv00024 20.4Other Termination

Elpida Memory Inc. et al v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al


Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al


Activision TV Inc. v. National CineMedia LLC


Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al


Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al


43

Remand to State Court

There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Remand to State Court. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 28.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

29

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Remand to State Court



Bio-Technology Gen. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al

1:02cv00235 28.1Remand to State Court

44

Transfer

There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Transfer



Air Products v. MG Nitrogen Services, et al

1:00cv00457 9.8Transfer

Original Creatine v. Kaizen Inc.


Miteq Inc. v. Comtech Telecomm.


Genfoot Inc. v. Payless Shoesource




Sumitomo Mitsubishi, et al v. MEMC Electronic


Finkelstein v. Mardkha, et al 1:04cv01423 2.0Transfer

Chih-Wen Chung v. Lumatec Industries


Arrow Communication Laboratories Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates Inc.


Ablaise Ltd. et al v. Bank of America Corporation


Riverbed Technology Inc. v. Quantum Corporation et al


Motorola Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al


Belden Technologies Inc. v. LS Corp. et al


Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc.


FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation et al


Brinkmeier v. Exergen Corporation


45

Transfer

There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

1

2

3

4

5

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Transfer



Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc. et al


Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc.


Fuisz Pharma LLC v. Theranos Inc.


Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc. 1:12cv01066 8.8Transfer

Ponziani v. Ford Motor Company et al


CO2 Solutions Inc. v. Akermin Inc.


Mitchell Ellis Products, Inc. v. Agrinomix LLC


46

Voluntary Dismissal

There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal



Intl Bus Machines v. Informix Corp.

1:00cv00073 17.9Voluntary Dismissal

Matsushita Electric v. Inverness Medical, et al


Color Kinetics Inc. v. Polaris Pool Systems


Softspikes Inc. v. Sure Grip Inc.


Axiohm IPB Inc. v. Epson America Inc., et al


Edwards Lifesciences v. Medtronic Inc.


Agilent Technologies v. Methode Electronics, et al


Europaisches Lab v. ISIS Pharmaceuticals


Housey Pharmaceutica, et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim, et al


Monsanto Company, et al v. Bayer Cropscience, et al


IQE (Europe) Ltd., et al v. Rockwell Tech., et al


Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Alcon Laboratories


Allergan Inc., et al v. Pharmacia Corp., et al


Proxim Incorporated v. 3Com Corporation, et al


Genentech Inc. v. Genzyme Corporation


Cypress Semiconduct v. Philips Semiconduct


Jupiter Media Metrix v. NetRatings, Inc

1:01cv00193 13.4Voluntary Dismissal 47

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Cypress Semiconduct, et al v. Integrated Circuit


Xicor Inc. v. Catalyst Semiconduct


Sandretto Industrie, et al v. Milacron Inc.


Integrated Device v. GSI Technology, et al


Photonetics Inc., et al v. New Focus Inc.


Outdoor Optics Inc. v. Bacou USA Inc.


ONDEO Nalco Company v. EKA Chemicals, Inc.


Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Medtronic Inc.


Invitrogen v. Incyte Genomics Inc.


Nippon Carbon Co LTD v. Nucor Corporation


Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Par Pharmaceutical


Corning Lasertron v. Rockwell Intl Corp., et al


Matsushita Electric v. Cinram International, et al


CertCo Inc. v. PayPal Inc. 1:02cv00094 2.7Voluntary Dismissal

Pure Technologies v. Physical Acoustics


Rockwell Tech LLC v. Corning Inc., et al


Original Creatine v. Muscletech Research


ONDEO Nalco Company v. EKA Chemicals Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Sulzer Carbomedics


Inline Connection v. Verizon Comm Inc.


Applied Separations v. Dionex Corporation


Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Alcon Laboratories


Original Creatine v. Optimum Nutrition


Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Allergan Inc., et al


National Steel Ltd. v. Greenbrier Companies, et al


Peer-To-Peer Systems v. Cybiko Inc.


Seikoh Giken Ltd., et al v. Domaille Engineering


Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals


Symbol Technologies v. Hand Held Products, et al


Peer-To-Peer Systems v. Palm, Inc., et al


Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Impax Laboratories


Honeywell Intl Inc, et al v. Electrolux Home, et al


NetRatings Inc. v. NPD Group Inc.


Lab Corp of America, et al v. Chiron Corporation


Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis Corporation


49

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Braintree Lab v. Schwarz Pharma Inc.


Whatman PLC v. Schuell Inc.


British Telecomm. v. SBC Communications, et al


British Telecomm. v. Qwest Comm Intl Inc., et al


British Telecomm. v. Verizon Comm., et al


British Telecomm. v. Broadwing Comm Serv., et al




Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Carbomedics Inc.


Guardian Industries v. Samsung Electronics, et al


Tenneco Automotive v. Visteon Corporation




KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & Devrient


Level 3 Comm LLC v. British Telecomm.


Guidant Corporation, et al v. St Jude Medical Inc., et al


Smithkline Beecham, et al v. Perrigo Company


Emulex Design, et al v. Qlogic Corporation




Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & Devrient




Seagate Technology, LLC v. Cornice Inc.


Turn of the Century v. SIG Combibloc Inc.


LML Patent Corp. v. Telecheck Services, et al


McKesson Information v. Trizetto Group Inc.


BTG Intl Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., et al


Scieran Tech. Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb


Lancaster Composite v. Hardcore Composites, et al


BioPay LLC v. Solidus Networks Inc, et al


Hitachi Ltd. v. Borgwarner Inc., et al


Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Intermec Technologies Corporation


Turn of the Century Solution L.P. v. Federal Signal Corporation et al


SRU Biosystems Inc. v. Hobbs et al


Mars Electronics International, Inc. et al v. International Currency Technologies Corp. et al


51

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Stratagene Corporation v. Third Wave Technologies Inc.


Alcatel USA Resources Inc. et al v. Foundry Networks Inc.


SEZ Holding AG et al v. Applied Materials Inc.


Hewlett-Packard Company v. SBC Laboratories Inc. et al


Internet Media Corporation v. Dell Inc. et al


Finisar Corporation v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.


Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Conor Medsystems Inc.


Turn of the Century Solution L.P. v. International Rectifier Corporation


Thales Airborne Systems S.A. et al v. Universal Avionics Systems Corporation


Sentillion Inc. v. Carefx Corp.


Teles AG Informationstechnologien v. Quintum Technologies LLC.


Arcelor France v. Mittal Steel USA Inc.


E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.


52

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Tandberg Telecom AS v. Starbak Communications Inc.


Quinstreet Inc. v. Parallel Networks, LLC


ZymoGenetics Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al


American Medical Systems Inc. et al v. Celsion Corporation


Amberwave Systems Corporation v. Intel Corporation


Southwest Airlines Co. v. Applied Interact LLC et al


OSRAM GMBH et al v. Citizen Watch Co. Ltd. et al


USA Video Technolgy Corporation v. Time Warner Inc. et al


Polaroid Corporation v. Hewlett-Packard Company


Guardian Industries Corp. v. Innolux Display Corporation


Microsoft Corporation v. Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise et al


Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX International Inc.




Interdigital Communications LLC et al v. Nokia Corporation et al


53

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Aisin Seiki Co Ltd. v. BorgWarner Inc. et al


Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al


Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Elan Corporation PLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


MAM Babyartikel GmbH et al v. Luv n' Care Ltd. et al


Cisco Systems Inc. et al v. GPNE Corp.


ArthroCare Corporation v. Gyrus Medical Inc. et al


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Sharp Corporation et al


Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al


SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.


Music Choice v. Viacom Inc. et al


Kwikset Corporation et al v. Master Lock LLC


JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al v. Affiliated Computer Services Inc. et al


CRS LLC v. Reflexive Entertainment Inc.


54

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Hilite International Inc. v. BorgWarner Inc. et al


Oxford Gene Technology IP Limited v. BioArray Solutions Ltd.


W. Neudorff GmbH KG v. Falcon Lab LLC


Motivation Innovations LLC v. DSW Inc. et al


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


StreamServe AB v. Exstream Software LLC et al




Novartis Corporation et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al


Wilco AG v. Packaging Technologies & Inspection LLC


NMT Medical Inc. et al v. W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.


Spansion LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al


Infineon Technologies AG et al v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. et al




Eurand Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Farstone Technology Inc. et al


Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems Inc.


British Telecommunications plc v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc.


Acushnet Company v. Callaway Golf Company




Stiefel Laboratories Inc. et al v. Cobrek Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


British Telecommunications plc v. Texas Instruments Incorporated


Eidos Communications LLC et al v. Skype Technologies SA et al


Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. CR Bard Inc. et al


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Apotex Corp. et al

1:09cv00304 23.0Voluntary Dismissal56

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Stiefel Laboratories Inc. v. KV Pharmaceutical Company


Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corporation et al


BASF Plant Science GmbH et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. et al


Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. et al v. BASF Corporation et al


Synchrome Technology Inc. v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. et al


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al


Congoleum Corporation v. Tarkett Enterprises Inc. et al


Arbitron Inc. v. Digimarc Corporation


LadaTech LLC v. Illumina Inc.


Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al


Congoleum Corporation v. Cryntel Enterprises Ltd. Inc.


Celgro Corporation v. Cambrex Corporation


Ricoh Company LTD et al v. Oki Data Corporation et al


Ricoh Company Ltd. et al v. Oki Data Corporation et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation v. Infineon Technologies AG et al


Congoleum Corporation v. Metroflor Corporation et al


BASF Catalysts LLC v. Johnson Matthey Inc et al


Cephalon Inc. v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Maquet Inc. et al


Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. v. EON Corporation


Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al




Sidergas SpA v. Lincoln Electric Company Inc. et al


Konarka Technologies Inc. et al


Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Sharp Corporation et al


Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Applied Interact LLC


LG Household & Healthcare Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Company


58

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




KANA Software Inc. v. Versata Enterprises Inc. et al


KANA Software Inc. v Versata Enterprises Inc. et al


Zodiac Pool Care Inc. v. Aquatron Inc. et al


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al


Acceleron, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., et al


Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. v. EON Corporation


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd et al


Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Eurand Inc. et al


Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Taro Pharmaceutical USA Inc. et al


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Fox Ridge LLC v. L-1 Identity Solutions Inc.


59

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Salient Surgical Technologies Inc. et al v. Bovie Medical Corporation


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Mylan Inc. et al


British Telecommunications plc v. Coxcom Inc. et al


Minkus Electronic Display Systems Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks Inc. et al


Internet Media Corporation v. Hearst Newspapers LLC


Versata Software Inc. et al v. Callidus Software Inc.


Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Round Rock Research LLC. v. HTC Corporation et al


Marvell International Ltd. v. Link A Media Devices Corp


CSR plc v. Broadcom Corporation


Everglades Interactive LLC v. Playfish Ltd et al


Triax Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Glenmark Generics Inc USA et al


60

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Graphics Properties Holdings Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.


Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc.


NetMonitor LLC v. Compuware Corporation et al


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al


Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Apotex Corp. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Avago Technologies U S Inc. et al v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al


Sharp Corporation v. AU Optronics Corp. et al


Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. et al. v. Biogen Idec Inc. et al


SRI International Inc. v. Symantec Corporation




Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc.


Alloqate LLC v. DealBase Corporation et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al




Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al


Eurand Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al


Resonant Biotechnologies LLC v. Corning Inc. et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Google Inc. et al.


Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al


Walker Digital LLC v Microsoft Corporation


W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. v. EMD Millipore Corporation


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Crayola LLC v. C2C Technologies LLC


62

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.


OSRAM GMBH v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al


Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation


Sudmo Holding GmbH v. SPX Corporation et al


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al


Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. HTC America Inc.




Samsung LED Co Ltd. v. OSRAM GmbH et al


Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P. et al v. Hikma (Maple) Ltd. et al


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


EI DuPont De Nemours and Company v. Heraeus Precious Metals North America Conshohocken LLC


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Canon Inc. et al


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.


63

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




CyberFone Systems LLC v. Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Audiocodes Inc. et al


LVL Patent Group LLC v. Vlingo Corporation et al


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Vizio Inc. et al


Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Federal Express Corporation et al


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Echostar Technologies LLC et al


Comcast Cable Communications LLC et al v. British Telecommunications plc




Aeritas LLC v. Alaska Air Group Inc.


Aeritas LLC v. Continental Airlines Inc.


Aeritas LLC v. Delta Airlines Inc.


Aeritas LLC v. United Airlines Inc.


Sensus USA Inc. v. Nxegen LLC et al


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Nikon Corporation et al


64

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Teijin Limited et al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al


Cequint Inc. v. Apple Inc. 1:11cv01224 17.3Voluntary Dismissal

Juniper Networks Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks Inc.


Aeritas LLC v. US Airways Group Inc. et al


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Cadila Healthcare Limited et al


Gevo Inc. v. Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al


Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00074 6.7Voluntary Dismissal

Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sandoz Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Bright House Networks LLC


65

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cequel Communications LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cable One Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al


CyberFone Systems LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cox Communications Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Knology Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Insight Communications Company, Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. RCN Telecom Services LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Mediacom Broadband LLC


CyberFone Systems LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc.


YYZ LLC v Hewlett-Packard Company


YYZ LLC v Software AG Inc. et al.


YYZ LLC v TIBCO Software Inc.




66

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al


Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00248 5.5Voluntary Dismissal

AbbVie Inc. et al v. Mylan Inc. et al


American Registry LLC v. Showmark Media LLC


Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.




Varia Holdings LLC v. Research in Motion Corporation et al


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al


Acronis International GmbH et al v. Symantec Corporation


Video Streaming Solutions LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.




Computer Software Protection LLC v. Autodesk Inc.


Computer Software Protection LLC v. Nuance Communications Inc.


Computer Software Protection LLC v. Wolfram Research Inc.


67

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.


Rovi Corporation et al v. LG Electronics Inc. et al


Rovi Corporation et al v. VIZIO Inc.


Rovi Corporation et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. et al


Round Rock Research LLC v. Sandisk Corporation


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Lupin Ltd. et al




Trustco Bank v. Automated Transactions LLC


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. CISCO Systems Inc.


Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Henkel Corporation et al


Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Akken Inc. et al


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. PulsePoint Inc.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s






Pfizer Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. Florida et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Wockhardt Ltd. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


Blue Sunny Skies LLC et al v. PV Thermal Solar LLC et al


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al


Tessera Inc. v. Amkor Technology Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Americold Logistics LLC


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Cost Plus Inc.


69

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Mobile Logistics LLC v. FedEx Freight Inc. et al


Mobile Logistics LLC V. Kimberly-Clark Corporation


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Kraft Foods Global Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Marten Transport Ltd.


Mobile Logistics LLC V. Nestle USA Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Supervalu Inc.


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Mattel Inc.


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Tissot USA Inc. et al


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Skullcandy Inc.


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Forevermark US Inc.


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Conde Nast Publications Inc. et al


Carrier Corporation v. Goodman Global Inc. et al


Versata Software Inc. et al v. Callidus Software Inc.


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Apotex Inc. et al






70

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Activision TV, Inc. v. Adflow Health Networks Inc.


Activision TV, Inc. v. National CineMedia LLC


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Arctic Express Inc.








Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Philadelphia Media Network LLC








LED Tech Development LLC v. Coleman Company Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. ATM Systems Corporation


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Brother Industries Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Canon Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Konica Minolta Holdings Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Lexmark International Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Payment Alliance International Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al


T5 Labs (Delaware) LLC v. Gaikai Inc.




LED Tech Development LLC v. Apple Inc.


LED Tech Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Best Data Products Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Dell Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Hiro Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Multi-Tech Systems Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Socket Mobile Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TRENDnet Inc.


72

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Telecomm Innovations LLC v. US Robotics Corporation


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Zoom Technologies Inc., et al.


Sprogis v. JVL Ventures LLC 1:12cv01352 9.4Voluntary Dismissal

Nestle Health Science - Pamlab Inc. et al v. Acella Pharmaceuticals LLC


AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida


FastVDO LLC v. Paramount Pictures Corporation


LED Tech Development LLC v. Fujitsu America Inc. et al


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Beta Systems Software of North America Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Jericho Systems Corporation


Afluo LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. et al


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Axiomatics Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Fischer International Identity LLC


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Sailpoint Technologies Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Tools4Ever Inc.


73

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Nexans Inc. et al v. Belden Inc. et al


Aeritas LLC v. Virgin America Inc.


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Bayer Properties LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Boulevard Invest LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. CenterCal Properties LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. General Growth Properties Inc.


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Irvine Company LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. JJ Gumberg Co.


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Simon Property Group LP


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Madison Marquette Retail Services Inc. et al


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. VF Outlet Inc


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Westfield Concession Management LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Macerich Partnership LP


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Short Hills Associates LLC et.al.


74

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. MOAC Mall Holdings LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Vornado Realty LP


Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc. et al


OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.


Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al


Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al


Orientview Technologies LLC v. Spy Inc.


AeroScout Ltd. et al v. Centrak Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. MegaPath Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Windstream Corporation


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra USA Inc. et al


75

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc


Preservation Technologies LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC


Charter Communications Inc. et al v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Sears Holding Corporation


Cloud Satchel LLC v. Kobo Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Creative Technology Ltd. et al


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Braven LC


Teijin Limited et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


76

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Estech Systems Inc. v. Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC


Automated Transactions LLC v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.


YYZ LLC v. Software AG Inc. et al


Activision TV, Inc. v. Wawa Inc.


Activelight Inc. v. Solohealth Inc.


Precision Biosciences Inc. et al v. Cellectis S.A. et al


Bosch Security Systems Inc. et al v. Criminal Activity Surveillance LLC


Activision TV, Inc. v. Carmike Cinemas, Inc.


Jack Henry & Associates Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. AOL Inc.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting Company et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. DirecTV Group Inc


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CNN Interactive Group et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Univision Interactive Media Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




FundsXpress Financial Network Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Canon Inc. et al.


Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al


Automated Transactions LLC v. Southbridge Savings Bank et al


Automated Transactions LLC v. Mascoma Savings Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Northfield Savings Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. New England Federal Credit Union


Automated Transactions LLC v. Heritage Family Credit Union


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v Americold Logistics LLC


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc.


Automated Transactions LLC v. Bath Savings Institution


Automated Transactions LLC v. Winchester Co-Operative Bank


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




YYZ LLC v. BMC Software Inc.


Automated Transactions LLC v. Adams Community Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Llewellyn-Edison Savings Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Community Bank of Bergen County


Automated Transactions LLC v. New York Community Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Stewart's Shops, Corp.


Automated Transactions LLC v. Trustco Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Dannemora Federal Credit Union


Automated Transactions LLC v. Astoria Financial Corporation et al


Automated Transactions LLC v. Sunoco, Inc. et al.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. EMC Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company


Data Speed Technology LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation


79

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Data Speed Technology LLC v. LexisNexis Group


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Microsoft Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Novell Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Oracle Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. World Software Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Xerox Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Zoho Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Open Text Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. SAP America Inc.


Precision Biosciences Inc. et al v. Lonza Group Ltd. et al


SRI International Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al


In re: Automated Transactions LLC - Patent Litigation

1:13md02429 23.2Voluntary Dismissal

Teijin Limited et al v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al


Arris Group Inc. et al v. Constellation Technologies LLC et al


IGT v. WMS Gaming Inc. 1:14cv00098 4.8Voluntary Dismissal

Data Speed Technology LLC v. Saba Software Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Data Speed Technology LLC v. Perforce Software Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Intuit Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Egnyte Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Autodesk Inc.


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Micro Labs Limited et al


MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Unum Group


Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Monoprice Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Harman International Industries Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. GN Netcom Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Boston Acoustics Inc.


MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Coca-Cola Company


Teijin Limited et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Gillette Company


81

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. AlertEnterprise Inc.


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Wockhardt Limited et al


Bockstar Technologies LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Courtesy Products LLC v. Hamilton Beach Brands Inc.


Jernberg Dental LLC v. Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC


WAND Corporation v. Activision TV Inc.


Teijin Limited et al v. Sun Pharma Global FZE et al


Teijin Limited et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Teijin Limited et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., et al.


Activision TV Inc. v. Arby's Restaurant Group Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. Wendy's International Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. Smashburger Master LLC


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al


Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC


82

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Lupin Limited et al


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al


Activision TV Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC


Device Security LLC v. Asurion LLC


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Strides Inc. et al


Mobile Logistics LLC V Omni-ID Ltd.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. News Distribution Network Inc.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NextPoint Inc. et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Ustream Inc.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated


Data Speed Technology LLC v Toshiba America Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc.


Ruckus Wireless Inc. v. Netgear Inc.


Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.


83

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




ImmerVision Inc. v. CBC Co. Ltd. et al


Alpex Pharma S A et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra USA Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc.




Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al


Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company


Aeritas LLC v. American Airlines Inc.


84

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Alcon Research Ltd. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Eclipse IP LLC v CDW Corporation


Eclipse IP LLC v. Golf Warehouse Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. L.L. Bean Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. PetMed Express Inc.


Cloud Satchel LLC v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al


Activision TV Inc. v. Omni Hotels Management Corporation


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Alfresco Software Ltd et al


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Box Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Blackboard Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al


Data Speed Technology LLC v. VMware Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Wolters Kluwer U.S. Corporation et al


Activision TV Inc. v. CDL West 45th Street LLC


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Activelight Inc. v. KAH 20 2nd Avenue LLC


Activision TV Inc. v. MGM Resorts International


Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. et al


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises Inc.


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v Ranbaxy Inc. et al




Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. First Time US Generics LLC


Preservation Technologies LLC v. CBS Interactive Inc.


Preservation Technologies LLC v. Fox Broadcasting Company


Preservation Technologies LLC v. New York Times Digital LLC


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Glenmark Generics Inc. USA et al


Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd et al.


Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al.


86

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Teijin Limited et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al


Teijin Limited et al v. Lupin Limited et al


Teijin Limited et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Beats Electronics LLC


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. JWIN Electronics Corp.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. SDI Technologies Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Yamaha Corporation of America


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Parrot SA, et al.


Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. et al


Automated Transactions LLC v. Speedy Cash


Automated Transactions LLC v. Goathead Saloon-AAA ATMS


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Imation Corporation


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Klipsch Group Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Spectra Merchandising International Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc.


87

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. EMC Corporation


Interface IP Holdings LLC v. Open Text Corporation


Amount Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.


Spherix Incorporated v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Oracle Corporation


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Reed Elsevier Group plc et al


Intercap Capital Partners LLC v. BuildingIQ Inc.


GPNE Corp. v. BP America Inc.


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Monster Worldwide Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Linkedin Corporation


Automated Transactions LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation


88

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Certainteed Corporation v. Owens Corning


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. General Electric Capital Corporation


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. TradeKing Group, Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Google Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company


SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. Polar Electro Inc. USA


SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. Withings Inc.


CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 18.7Voluntary Dismissal

Proximity Monitoring Innovations LLC v Voxx Electronics Corp. et al


Spherix Incorporated et al. v. Juniper Networks Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Amazon Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Canon Inc. et al


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Cavium Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. DirecTV, et al.


89

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Yamaha Corporation of America


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Diebold Incorporated


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. NCR Corporation


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Brother Industries Ltd. et al


Pfizer Inc. et al v. CFT Pharmaceuticals LLC


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Xerox Corporation


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.


Teijin Limited et al v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.


Sequent Data LLC v. Asus Computer International


Sequent Data LLC v. Buffalo Americas Inc. et al.


Sequent Data LLC v. Memorex Products Inc. et al


Sequent Data LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al


Sequent Data LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., et al.


Sequent Data LLC v. Plextor LLC, et al.


Sequent Data LLC v. Sony Optiarc America Inc., et al.


90

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Pixion Inc. v. Blackboard Inc.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group LLC


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Cable One Inc.


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. CenturyLink Communications LLC


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Sprint Corporation


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. T-Mobile US Inc.


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. United States Cellular Corporation


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. WideOpenWest Finance LLC


91

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Actavis Inc. et al


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Actavis Inc. et al


Pixion Inc. v. Saba Software Inc.


Kowa Company Ltd et al v. Sawai USA Inc. et al


Daravita Limited v. Sun Pharma Global FZE et al


Pixion Inc. v. FuzeBox Software Corporation


Pixion Inc. v. BigBlueButton Inc. et al.


Pixion Inc. v. Start Meeting LLC


Pfizer Inc. et al v. Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. et al


Corning Inc. v. DSM Desotech Inc. et al


Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Aptina (U.S.) Inc. et al


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Micro Labs Limited et al


Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.


Kowa Company Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Preservation Technologies LLC vs. Viacom, Inc.


Preservation Technologies LLC vs. MLB Advanced Media L.P.


92

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Preservation Technologies LLC vs. NFL Enterprises LLC


Preservation Technologies LLC v Vevo LLC


Preservation Technologies LLC v World Wrestling Entertainment Inc.


Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc.


Teijin Limited et al v. Unimark Remedies Ltd.


Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.


Round Rock Research LLC v. Canon Inc. et al


Round Rock Research LLC v. JVC Kenwood Corp. et al


Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.


Round Rock Research LLC v. Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al


Vite Technologies LLC v. Arthrex Inc.


Vite Technologies LLC v. Smith & Nephew Inc.


iCeutica Pty Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al


Pfizer Inc et al v. Mylan Laboratories Limited


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Koss Corporation


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Media Bridge LLC v. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. et al.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Plantronics Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Polk Audio LLC et al


Round Rock Research LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al


Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.


Draeger Medical Systems Inc. v. My Health Inc.


DNA Genotek Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA LLC


Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Blackbird Tech LLC v. Roadmaster, Inc.


Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.


Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.


Teijin Limited et al v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Akorn Inc.


Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


94

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Spherix Incorporated


R-Tech Ueno, Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc. et al


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd. et al


Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Adtran Inc.


Allergan, Inc. v. InnoPharma, Inc. et al


Spherix Incorporated v. Verizon Services Corp. et al


Litera Technologies LLC v. DocsCorp LLC


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al v. Akorn, Inc.


Novanta Corporation v. Iradion Laser, Inc.


Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.


Cephalon, Inc. et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC


Segway Inc. et al v. Razor USA LLC


Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al


Sound View Innovations, LLC v. LinkedIn Corp.


95

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Sound View Innovations LLC v. Twitter Inc.


NM, LLC et al v. Quikrete Companies, LLC


Aptalis Pharma Canada ULC et al v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.


Fit4D, Inc. v. My Health, Inc. 1:16cv01076 4.8Voluntary Dismissal

Henkel Corporation v. Oakite Products Inc.


Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Medtronic Inc.


Mallinckrodt Inc., et al v. Maxtec Inc., et al


Syngenta Crop v. Bayer AG 1:01cv00317 3.3Voluntary Dismissal

Aventis Pharma Prod., et al v. Introgen Thera Inc.


Armstrong World, et al v. Mannington Mills Inc


TA Instruments, Inc., et al v. Perkinelmer Inc.


Digimarc Corporation v. Spectra Systems




Campbell Mfg v. American Granby Inc.


UD Technology Corp. v. Global Solar Energy, et al


Cooper Cameron Corp. v. FMC Technologies


Advanced Video v. Cirrus Logic, Inc.


Cooper Cameron Corporation v. Dril-Quip, Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Novo Nordisk A/S v. Sanofi-Aventis et al


Stabler Companies Inc. et al v. Scientex Corporation


Tokai Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. Volkswagen of America Inc. et al


Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. YDI Wireless Inc. et al


Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion Wireless Inc.


Secure Elements Inc. v. Citadel Security Software Inc.


Avago Technologies General IP Pte Ltd et al v. Finisar Corporation


Syngenta Seeds Inc. et al v. DeKalb Genetics Corporation


Interlink Electronics Inc. v. Nintendo of America


Celgene Corporation et al v. Abrika Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al


Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Tennrich International Corporation


Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Shieldex Trading Gmbh


Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. et al v. DeKalb Genetics Corporation et al


Optium Corporation v. Emcore Corporation et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Renesas Technology Corp. et al


Girafa.com Inc. v. Amazon Web Services LLC et al


Janssen L P et al v. KV Pharmaceutical Company


Fifth Market Inc. v. CME Group Inc. et al


Miller v. Durney et al 1:08cv00068 2.3Voluntary Dismissal

Edgecraft Corporation v. Luckyman Enterprise Co. Ltd.


Streamlight, Inc. v. Sportsmans Guide, Inc.


Channel Intelligence Inc. v. SBSH Mobile Software Ltd. et al


Channel Intelligence Inc. v. Lemonade Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Sandoz Inc.


DVDPlay Inc. v. Redbox Automated Retail LLC


Pylon Manufacturing Corp v. Jamak Fabrication-Tex LLC


Picsel (Research) Ltd. et al v. Apple Inc.


Mr. Bar-B-Q- Inc. v. Belk Inc. 1:09cv00259 1.1Voluntary Dismissal

Tandberg Inc. v. Multimedia Patent Trust


Verizon Communications Inc. et al v. Cablevision Systems Corp.


98

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited et al


Daikin Industries Ltd v. Arkema SA et al


KV Pharmaceutical Company et al v. Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al


Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Apotex Corp. et al


Everglades Interactive LLC v. Winster Inc. et al


AU Optronics Corporation et al v. Sharp Corporation et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Facebook Inc. et al


Seiko Epson Corporation v. Giantplus Technology, Co., Ltd. et al


Walker Digital LLC v. BuyWithMe Inc. et al


Sharing Sound LLC v. Audio and Video Labs, Inc. et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Google Inc.


Tessenderlo Kerley Inc. v. Purfresh Inc.




99

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Appriss Inc. v. Information Strategies Inc.


Hot Headz International Inc. et al v. The Bridge Direct Inc.


Digital CBT LLC v. TiVo Inc. 1:11cv00917 5.5Voluntary Dismissal

Echopharm USA LLC v. Ralco Nutrition Inc.


YYZ LLC v Fujitsu America Inc. et al.


Pfizer Inc. et al v. McNeil-PPC Inc.


Computer Software Protection LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated


Computer Software Protection LLC v. Mathworks Inc.


Terez v. Audience Corporation


Alcorn Communications LLC v. Vocus Inc.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. Implix USA INC.


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al


OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories INC.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. VerticalResponse Inc.


Recognicorp LLC v. Oakley Capital Private Equity et al


100

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Mobile Logistics LLC v. Dimension Trucking Services Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Shaw Industries Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Transfreight LLC


Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Boucheron Joaillerie USA Inc.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. Direct IQ LLC


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Penske Logistics LLC


Activision TV, Inc. v. Adspace Networks Inc.


Activision TV, Inc. v. E-Cast Inc.


Orientview Technologies LLC v. SkyMall Inc.


lululemon athletica canada inc. v. Calvin Klein Inc. et al


Orientview Technologies LLC v. Iconix Brand Group Inc.


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. E.W. Scripps Company


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Times Publishing Company


LED Tech Development LLC v. Home Depot USA Inc.


101

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Kyocera Document Solutions Inc. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. NEC Corporation et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. OKI Electric Industry Co. Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Sharp Corporation et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. IC Intracom USA LLC et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Lantronix Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd, et al.


Sprogis v. Google Inc. 1:12cv01351 8.9Voluntary Dismissal

Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. New York Times Company


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Aegis USA Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Allen Systems Group, Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Courion Corporation


102

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Evidian Systems Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Simeio Solutions LLC


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Symplified Inc.


Orientview Technologies LLC v. Just Fabulous Inc.


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Lerner Corporation


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Tarragon LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Urban Retail Properties LLC


Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Glimcher Colonial Park Mall, Inc., et al.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. D.B. Solutions Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Getnet Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. InReach Internet Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. LinkLine Communications Inc.


103

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. O.T.T. Communications Incorporated


Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Simbionix LTD. et al


Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. CAE Healthcare USA Inc. et al


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel Lucent USA Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Barracuda Networks Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Grandstream Networks Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Mitel Networks Inc.


Genetic Technologies Limited v. General Genetics Corporation


Effective Exploration LLC v. Whiting Oil and Gas Corp.


Effective Exploration LLC v. Petro-Hunt LLC


Effective Exploration LLC v. EOG Resources Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Centrify Corporation


Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.


Orientview Technologies LLC v. ShoeDazzle.com Inc.


Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Empire One Telecommunications Inc.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. PR Newswire Association LLC


Alcorn Communications LLC v. eMinor Inc.


Orientview Technologies LLC v. Shop It To Me Inc.


North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.


Alcorn Communications LLC v. ABN Newswire LLC


Apicore US LLC v. Pfizer Inc.


Fidelity National Information Services Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Inc.


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. The Gap Inc.


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Safeway Inc.


105

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Orientview Technologies LLC v. Beachmint Inc.


Automated Transactions LLC v. Bogota Savings Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Enterprise National Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. First Bank


Automated Transactions LLC v. Buffalo Service Credit Union


Automated Transactions LLC v. Buffalo Community Federal Credit Union


Alcorn Communications LLC v. Business Wire Inc.


Orientview Technologies LLC v. Hat World Corporation


Alcorn Communications LLC v. Constant Contact Inc.


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. MasterCard Incorporated


Data Speed Technology LLC v. MindJet LLC


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Logitech Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc.


Effective Exploration LLC v. Petro Harvester Operating Company LLC


106

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Effective Exploration LLC v. Murex Petroleum Corp.


MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Huhtamaki Americas Inc.


MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Dillard's Inc.


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Agiliance Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corporation


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Honeywell International Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. CafePress Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. American Apparel Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. Aeropostale Inc.


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Quantumdigital Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Atlas RFID Holdings Inc., et al


Mobile Logistics LLC v Confidex Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Intelleflex Corporation


Mobile Logistics LLC v. International Audio Visual Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v. Fluensee Inc.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Mobile Logistics LLC v Motorola Solutions Inc.


Mobile Logistics LLC v RedPrairie Corp.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ingenico S.A. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Equinox Payments LLC


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Verifone Systems Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. Harley-Davidson Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. CSG Systems Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Canon U.S.A. Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Fujitsu America Inc.


Security Technology LLC v. Asurion LLC


Activision TV Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America Inc.


KeySee Software Ltd. v. Verint Systems Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. ATM Systems


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Equinox Payments LLC


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Dell Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al


108

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Hiro Inc.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ingenico S.A. et al


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd et al.


Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TRENDnet Inc.


Activision TV Inc. v. Nevada Property 1 LLC


Eclipse IP LLC v Avon Products Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. Fanatics Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. Office Depot Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. OfficeMax North America Inc.


Eclipse IP LLC v. Sears Holdings Corporation


Activision TV Inc. v. Colbea Enterprises LLC


Activision TV Inc. v. Tri Star Energy LLC


Activision TV Inc. v. Gulf Oil Limited Partnership


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Cincom Systems Inc.


Data Speed Technology LLC v. Document Logistix Ltd. et al


109

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Data Speed Technology LLC v. Fiserv Inc. et al


Activision TV Inc. v. White Castle Management Co.


Activelight Inc. v. Cosi Inc. 1:13cv01471 12.3Voluntary Dismissal

Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Provide Commerce Inc.


Computer Software Protection LLC v. Microsoft Corporation


Preservation Technologies LLC v. Target Brands Inc.


Preservation Technologies LLC v. Vimeo LLC


ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Jamcracker Inc.


Effective Exploration LLC v. Newfield Exploration Company


Speed Monitoring Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC


Speed Monitoring Technologies LLC v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. AARP Services Inc.


Spherix Incorporated v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Open Text Corporation et al


110

Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. TD Bank National Association


Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. SunTrust Banks Inc. et al


Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corporation


MasterCard Incorporated v. Open Network Solutions Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH, et al.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Advanced Digital Broadcast Holdings SA


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V., et al.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Nautilus Hyosung America Inc.


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Hisense Company Ltd. et al


Open Network Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Sequent Data LLC v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea Inc. et al.


Sequent Data LLC v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, et al.


Sequent Data LLC v. Verbatim Americas LLC, et al.


Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Mediacom Communications Corporation


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al


Recordati Rare Diseases Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLC et al


Activelight Inc. v. GoGo Media Networks Inc.


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al


Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. VIVUS Inc.


Preservation Technologies LLC v. Mindgeek USA Incorporated


Agiliance Inc. v. Telos Corporation


Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. PCI of Virginia LLC


Round Rock Research LLC v. SanDisk Corp.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC


Quest Integrity USA LLC v. A Hak Industrial Services US LLC


Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corp. et al


Treehouse Avatar Technologies Inc. v. Snail Games USA Inc.


Horizon Pharma Ireland Limited et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al


Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Belkin International Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Monster Inc.


B Therapy LLC v. SenoRX Inc. et al.


B Therapy LLC v. Varian Medical Systems Inc.


B Therapy LLC v. Xoft Inc. et al.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Circus World Display Ltd.


Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Pioneer Corporation et al.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al.


Medac Pharma Inc. et al v. Antares Pharma Inc.


Media Bridge LLC v. Thinaire Transmedia Network Inc.


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v Velodyne Acoustics Inc.


B Therapy LLC v. Best Medical International Inc.


Gilead Sciences Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al


Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. E&S International Enterprises Inc. et al


Telescope Time LLC v. Wevideo Inc.


Blackbird Tech LLC v. AP Products Inc.


Blackbird Tech LLC v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. General Nutrition Investment Company et al


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Select Comfort Corporation


GovX, Inc. v. Shipping and Transit LLC


Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation et al


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




Janssen Biotech Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al


Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. et al


Sage Labs Inc. v. Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals Inc.


Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Cuisinarts Corporation et al


CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina et al v. Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd.


North Star Innovations Inc. v. Arkadin Inc. et al


North Star Innovations Inc. v. Polycom Inc.


North Star Innovations Inc. v. Vidyo, Inc.


UCB, Inc. v. Alza Corporation


6115187 Canada Inc. v. Samsung Techwin America et al


Lux Products Corp. v. Elementi Moderni, LLC


IP Communication Solutions, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.


Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al


North Star Innovations Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.


Voluntary Dismissal


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

1920

2122

2324

2526

2728

2930

3132

3334

3536

3738

3940

4142

4344

4546

4749

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s




PRO Orthopedic Devices, Inc. v. Ortho Equine LLC


Segway Inc. et al v. Shenzhen Chenduoxing Electronic Technology Ltd., China


Segway Inc. et al v. Nanjing Fastwheel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.


Segway Inc. et al v. Hovershop


Segway Inc. et al v. PhunkeeDuck, Inc.,


Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al v. Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


HID Global Corporation et al v. ICEPAT AG et al


Human Design Medical, LLC v. My Health, Inc.


Alcon Research Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al


Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Cipla Limited et al


United Therapeutics Corporation v. Par Sterile Products, LLC et al


116

Want of Prosecution

There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

9 27 33 46

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Want of Prosecution



Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.

1:08cv00166 8.8Want of Prosecution

Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. V. Sierra Wireless Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Pantech Corp et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Dell Inc.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Barnes & Noble Inc. et al

1:12cv01157 26.9Want of Prosecution117

Want of Prosecution

There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

9 27 33 46

Month of Litigation

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

s

Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Want of Prosecution



Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Pantech Corp., et al.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sierra Wireless Inc., et al.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc., et al.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Dell Inc.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v Amazon.Com Inc.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al.


118

Awards and Settlement Amounts:The awards or settlement amounts found in these cases (if any) are shown below.

Date of Decision AmountCase OutcomeCase NumberCase Name

Bayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al

1:01cv00148 Bench Trial $1,874,57112/8/2003


1:01cv00680 Bench Trial $6,30610/4/2004

Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment $5,0007/26/2007


1:08cv00779 Consent Judgment $1,725,000,0002/2/2010

Symbol Technologies v. Proxim Inc.

1:01cv00801 Jury Verdict $25,917,6698/4/2004


1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict $8,691,6001/10/2007


1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict $45,300,0009/18/2007

Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.

1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict $50,469,70310/2/2008


1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict $41,500,0003/13/2012


1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict $22,300,0286/20/2003

SRI International Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

1:13cv01534 Jury Verdict $56,954,8305/25/2017

Intuitive Surgical, et al v. Computer Motion Inc.

1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict $4,442,60512/11/2002

119

Appeal Outcomes:There have been 130 appealed cases. The results of those appeals (if any) are shown below. Note that the appeal may be an interlocutory appeal or an appeal of a final judgment. The complete affirmance rate (affirmance with no other action), affirmed at least in part rate, and the reversed at least in part rate are shown below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Complete Affirmance Affirmed at Least in Part Reversed at Least in Part

58.1

80.2

22.1

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Win Rates on Appeal

Appeal OutcomeCase OutcomeCase NumberCase Name

Cephalon Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

1:09cv00724 Bench Trial Affirmed

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc.

1:14cv01422 Bench Trial Pending

Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI Inc., et al

1:03cv01158 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded

Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al




Cancer Research Technology Limited v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al

1:07cv00457 Bench Trial Reversed


1:11cv00164 Bench Trial Dismissed



Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.

1:09cv00286 Bench Trial Reversed,Remanded

Intendis GmbH et al v. Glenmark Generics Limited et al


Vanderbilt University v. ICOS Corporation


120

Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al


Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al

1:07cv00823 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded

Bayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al

1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al



1:02cv01250 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC


In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation

1:09md02118 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Dismissed



In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation


Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Genetics Institute LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc.


Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corporation, et al




Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.


Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

1:08cv00330 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed

Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al

1:02cv00332 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated

HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al

1:13cv00430 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded


1:14cv00599 Consent Judgment Pending

HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Vevo LLC


Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.

1:11cv01152 Consent Judgment Affirmed

HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Google Inc. et al


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Disney Online et al.


HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Viacom International Inc.


121

HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc.



1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Dismissed

Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company

1:13cv00539 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed

Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc.


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc.


Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC Bank N.A.

1:14cv01428 Involuntary Dismissal Pending

Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al

1:03cv00990 Involuntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded,Dismissed

Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC


Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank et al


Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.


Goodman Manufacturing Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation


Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc.


Parus Holdings Inc. v. SunTrust Bank et al



1:11cv01171 Involuntary Dismissal Affirmed


1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict Affirmed

Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC

1:11cv00908 Jury Verdict Pending



Stambler v. RSA Security Inc., et al



1:06cv00091 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded

SOITEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc.

1:08cv00292 Jury Verdict Dismissed

Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.

1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded

Ironworks Patents LLC v. Apple Inc.

1:10cv00258 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded

Asahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. Guardian Industries Corp.


122

McKesson Automation Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG et al


Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et al

1:14cv01317 Jury Verdict Pending

Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp

1:08cv00542 Jury Verdict Reversed,Remanded

Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al




ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., et al

1:01cv00504 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded,Dismissed



INVISTA North America S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al


Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al

1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded

ArcelorMittal France et al v. AK Steel Corporation et al

1:10cv00050 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded





Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.


Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.

1:12cv00140 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed



DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNA et al

1:15cv00661 Lack of Jurisdiction Pending

Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc.


Innovative Therapies Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc. et al


Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc.


Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al

1:07cv00780 Lack of Jurisdiction Dismissed

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron LLC

1:07cv00650 Lack of Jurisdiction Reversed,Remanded,Dismissed

Housey v. Abbott Pharm Corp., et al

1:01cv00401 Other Termination Affirmed


1:03cv00283 Other Termination Reversed


1:04cv00034 Other Termination Affirmed

Bio-Technology Gen. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al

1:02cv00235 Remand to State Court Dismissed

Oracle Corporation et al v. Parallel Networks LLC

1:06cv00414 Summary Judgment Vacated,Remanded

Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Cokebusters USA Inc.

1:14cv01483 Summary Judgment Pending

Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

1:08cv00568 Summary Judgment Affirmed

123

Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc.


Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al

1:05cv00141 Summary Judgment Dismissed

Helicos Biosciences Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc



1:10cv00039 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated

Monsanto Company, et al v. Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al




Cloud Satchel LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.


ArcelorMittal et al v. AK Steel Corporation

1:13cv00685 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded

IGT v. Bally Gaming International Inc. et al


Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc.


Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun Products Corporation


LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & Body Works, et al


Cradle IP LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.




CyberFone Systems LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al



1:11cv00054 Summary Judgment Reversed,Vacated,Remanded



Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.


Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al






Wellman Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Company


Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm Foods Inc.


Izumi Products Co v. Koninklijke Philips, et al


BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.


SRI International v. Internet Security, et al

1:04cv01199 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded



Toshiba Corporation v. Juniper Networks, et al

1:03cv01035 Summary Judgment Affirmed 124

Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes Noble Inc.


CyberFone Systems LLC v. CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al


Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.


ArcelorMittal France et al v. Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al

1:13cv00686 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Remanded

Braintree Lab v. Schwarz Pharma Inc.

1:03cv00477 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed

Marvell International Ltd. v. Link A Media Devices Corp

1:10cv00869 Voluntary Dismissal Reversed

CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed

Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis Corporation

1:03cv00402 Voluntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded

Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX International Inc.

1:07cv00137 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed

Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. et al

1:14cv00270 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed

Lab Corp of America, et al v. Chiron Corporation

1:03cv00364 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed

Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.

1:08cv00166 Want of Prosecution Dismissed

125

Motion Outcomes:The number of contested motion decisions, win rate, and time in months from motion filing to decision by Judge Robinson in these cases are shown below, broken out by motion type and movant. The movant for Markman decisions is listed as "Unknown" in LegalMetric's system because there is not requirement for an actual motion to initiate the claim construction process, and the win rate is arbitrarily set to "0". The stay motions listed below include all stay motions, not just stay pending IPR or stay pending reexamination motions. See following sections for details. For all motion types, the average win rate on plaintiff's motions was 44.7%, the average win rate on defendant's motions was 37.4% and the difference was 7.2%. The nationwide difference on plaintiff v. defendant motion win rates in patent cases is 6%.

Number Win Rate Pendency

Bifurcation Total 14 64.3 2.6

Defendant 7 71.4 2.7

Plaintiff 7 57.1 2.5

Consolidate Total 29 27.6 2.8

Defendant 9 0.0 3.3


Contempt Total 2 50.0 7.4


Default Motion Total 9 77.8 1.0


Discovery Total 166 61.7 1.9



Third Party 7 71.4 2.6

Unknown 1 100.0 0.0

Dismissal Total 270 43.3 6.0




Exceptional Case Total 13 15.4 8.2


Plaintiff 3 0.0 8.3

Expert/Daubert Total 172 43.0 2.2



Third Party 1 100.0 1.7126


Increased Damages Total 1 100.0 9.1


Intervention Total 7 78.6 1.6



Judgment on the Pleadings

Total 13 50.0 4.8


Plaintiff 2 0.0 3.4

Markman Decision Total 112 0.9 25.7

Unknown 112 0.9 25.7

Permanent Injunction Total 19 47.4 7.7

Defendant 1 0.0 8.8


Post-trial Total 118 14.4 8.2



Preliminary Injunction Total 34 35.3 5.7



Remand Motion Total 1 100.0 7.6


Sanctions/Attorneys Fees Total 42 33.3 6.6




Sever Total 29 34.5 4.4



Stay Total 133 49.2 3.5




Summary Judgment Total 443 36.6 4.4


Plaintiff 177 36.7 4.5 127


Temporary Restraining Order Motion

Total 6 50.0 2.9


Transfer Motion Total 81 29.0 5.3



128

Bifurcation

There were 14 Bifurcation contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 64.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 7 8

2

5

3

1 1 1 1

Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Bifurcation


Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision

1:09cv00264 Granted in part, Denied in Part

Plaintiff 7.4 1/20/11

1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03

1:08cv00542 Granted Defendant 1.9 8/26/09

1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 12/21/09


1:06cv00028 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 9/16/08










129

Consolidate

There were 29 Consolidate contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 27.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1 2 3 4 5 7 13

12

54

1

3 3

1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Consolidate























1:10cv00428 Denied without Prejudice

Defendant 2.9 8/16/11


Defendant 2.8 8/16/11130









131

Contempt

There were 2 Contempt contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

8

2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Contempt





132

Default Motion

There were 9 Default Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 77.8%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 2 7

7

1 1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Default Motion












133

Discovery

There were 166 Discovery contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 61.7%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13

94

24 23

5 3 3 6 4 1 3


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Discovery

















































1:15cv00543 Granted Third Party 0.0 5/30/17


























135





























1:06cv00239 Granted Unknown 0.0 8/23/07


















1:00cv00796 Denied Third Party 7.9 3/25/02






1:13cv00473 Denied Third Party 1.7 9/9/14


























































138

Dismissal

There were 270 Dismissal contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 6.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1215

2325

3431

28

39

26

12

75

13


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Dismissal
























1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 12/12/02 139











































142








































143










































144















Defendant 12.5 12/18/14



























145













































146




















147

Exceptional Case

There were 13 Exceptional Case contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 15.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

3 5 6 8 10 12 13

2

1 1

5

1 1

2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Exceptional Case








1:09md02118 Granted Defendant 7.6 1/12/12














148

Expert/Daubert

There were 172 Expert/Daubert contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 2.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13

64

32

22 22 20

72 1 2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

sDistribution of Decisions by Month

For Expert/Daubert

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why



































































150















1:10cv00503 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Invalidity



Defendant 5.7 1/13/14 Infringement









1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Obviousness

1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Testing





1:14cv00874 Granted Third Party 1.7 9/3/15 Infringement

1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 FDA Procedures

1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 Infringement; FDA Approved Label


Defendant 0.5 2/18/16 Written Description; Reasonable Royalties



1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 2/18/16 Technical


153


1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 4.1 12/19/16 Infringement




1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 4.3 2/22/17 Survey

154

Increased Damages

There were 1 Increased Damages contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 9.1. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

10

1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Increased Damages




155

Intervention

There were 7 Intervention contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 78.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

2.4

2.8

3.2

1 2 3 4

2

3

1 1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Intervention





Third Party 3.7 6/29/00




Third Party 1.8 10/30/14



156

Judgment on the Pleadings

There were 13 Judgment on the Pleadings contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

2.4

2.8

3.2

1 2 3 6 8 9 10

3

2

1 1

3

2

1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Judgment on the Pleadings

















157

Markman Decision

There were 112 Markman Decision contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 0.9%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 25.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

11 12 132 2

108


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Markman Decision



1:04cv01507 Markman Decision

Unknown 22.3 10/19/06


Unknown 31.1 10/14/05


Unknown 26.7 6/3/05


Unknown 35.2 9/7/00


Unknown 82.6 1/5/05


Unknown 28.8 9/7/00


Unknown 22.5 5/1/00


Unknown 19.4 12/22/00


Unknown 19.9 8/17/01


Unknown 16.8 12/13/06


Unknown 28.8 1/10/03


Unknown 23.9 1/29/03


Unknown 25.4 3/27/03


Unknown 25.4 3/27/03


Unknown 20.2 11/12/02

158


Unknown 15.4 7/12/02


Unknown 20.5 4/9/03


Unknown 19.3 3/21/03


Unknown 19.8 7/30/03


Unknown 24.5 1/5/04


Unknown 25.9 4/27/04


Unknown 27.9 11/19/04


Unknown 27.9 2/22/06


Unknown 19.6 6/30/05


Unknown 31.5 6/28/06


Unknown 24.7 12/16/05


Unknown 22.6 11/8/05


Unknown 11.7 1/5/05


Unknown 25.7 10/17/06


Unknown 21.9 8/23/07


Unknown 21.3 11/20/07


Unknown 23.7 11/1/01


Unknown 28.6 6/3/05


Unknown 25.7 4/15/03


Unknown 22.8 5/6/03


Unknown 19.5 3/27/03


Unknown 82.3 1/5/05


Unknown 38.0 3/8/01


Unknown 29.2 12/4/08


Unknown 22.3 1/19/07


Unknown 30.5 4/22/05


Unknown 21.4 9/15/09


Unknown 18.7 4/5/06


Unknown 50.0 4/20/10


Unknown 39.9 9/14/10


Unknown 31.7 1/20/10 159


Unknown 30.5 6/14/10


Unknown 26.5 3/5/10


Unknown 30.8 8/24/10


Unknown 21.3 2/24/10


Unknown 28.8 10/13/10


Unknown 19.1 3/30/10


Unknown 17.8 7/26/10


Unknown 61.5 3/9/11


Unknown 38.7 11/18/10


Unknown 26.9 1/5/11


Unknown 27.1 10/18/11


Unknown 39.3 12/19/11


Unknown 29.1 1/24/12


Unknown 29.1 6/19/12


Unknown 25.5 4/9/13


Unknown 31.0 4/10/14


Unknown 31.8 5/5/14


Unknown 18.4 6/3/14


Unknown 26.2 5/14/14


Unknown 36.3 7/22/14


Unknown 26.6 7/21/14


Unknown 27.1 8/26/14


Unknown 24.8 8/14/14


Unknown 21.5 6/30/14

1:12cv01572 Granted Unknown 18.2 6/3/14


Unknown 39.8 1/30/15


Unknown 40.4 3/10/15


Unknown 30.4 2/24/15


Unknown 29.0 2/24/15


Unknown 22.6 12/12/14


Unknown 22.0 1/23/15160


Unknown 15.6 4/9/15


Unknown 24.0 3/27/15


Unknown 24.6 5/14/15


Unknown 21.0 6/1/15


Unknown 14.6 7/31/15


Unknown 10.2 6/18/15


Unknown 10.9 7/8/15


Unknown 23.3 11/18/15


Unknown 15.3 10/6/15


Unknown 14.0 9/3/15


Unknown 16.3 11/18/15


Unknown 12.1 10/20/15


Unknown 32.9 12/17/15


Unknown 33.4 1/7/16


Unknown 16.6 1/8/16


Unknown 16.9 1/29/16


Unknown 16.8 2/9/16


Unknown 17.3 3/4/16


Unknown 15.6 3/4/16


Unknown 14.2 2/29/16


Unknown 12.2 3/4/16


Unknown 47.1 3/21/16


Unknown 15.9 5/6/16


Unknown 18.4 6/28/16


Unknown 18.8 10/24/16


Unknown 16.7 11/14/16


Unknown 15.8 11/21/16


Unknown 11.1 11/18/16


Unknown 20.0 2/22/17


Unknown 26.3 5/19/17


Unknown 24.2 3/30/17 161


Unknown 20.9 4/19/17


Unknown 17.6 4/24/17


Unknown 13.4 6/1/17


Unknown 60.9 5/15/17

162

Permanent Injunction

There were 19 Permanent Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 47.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

2.4

2.8

3.2

2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

3

1

2

1 1

3 3

2 2

1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Permanent Injunction

























163

Post-trial

There were 118 Post-trial contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 14.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

4

8

12

16

20

1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

15

21

4

119

18

1413

2

1514


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion


For Post-trial



1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/14/03 Validity; Anticipation

1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Willfulness

1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Infringement; Willfulness

1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Noninfringement

1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode

1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 No Willfulness

1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Obviousness












1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 0.1 12/10/04 Noninfringement164


Defendant 0.1 12/9/04 Noninfringement

1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 6.5 12/8/05 Validity; Obviousness

1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 6.5 12/8/05 Noninfringement; Invalidity; Written Description; Indefiniteness

1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 10.3 5/11/06 Noninfringement; invalidity

1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 5/11/06 Noninfringement; DOE; Invalidity; Obviousness

1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 9/24/07 Infringement


1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 9.6 6/15/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity

1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 11.2 1/10/07 Noninfringement - Literal; Invalidity - Anticipation; No Willfulness

1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 7.9 8/17/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Anticipation











1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness





1:98cv00019 Denied Plaintiff 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness

1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/17/05 Not Available



Defendant 0.0 2/17/05 Validity - Anticipation; 112; Obviousness

1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Improper Claim Construction

1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Noninfringement; Ownership; Invalidity - Obviousness




1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Inequitable Conduct165


1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 4.7 7/8/03 Validity - Obviousness

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Limitation on Damages

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement


1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness


1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement




1:99cv00781 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 8/9/02 Validity - Anticipation - On-Sale



Plaintiff 10.9 9/27/02 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Written Description Granted - Obviousness - Denied




1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode




1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 9/15/08 Damages - Non-infringing Substitutes

1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness

1:06cv00091 Denied Plaintiff 11.8 4/21/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness


Plaintiff 5.3 11/3/10 Validity - Derivation (Denied); Obviousness (Granted); Infringement (Granted

1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 9.4 3/9/11 Inequitable Conduct

1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness


Defendant 9.9 8/12/11 Invalidity - Anticipation (Denied); Obviousness (New Trial Granted)

166


Plaintiff 9.6 8/12/11 Validity - Anticipation (Granted); Obviousness (Denied)

1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 7.0 7/13/11 Invalidity - Enablement; Obviousness

1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 7/13/11 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness


1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 8/25/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness; Evidence not previously disclosed; Improper and Prejudicial Statements; Erroneous Jury instructions; Claim Construction


1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 1/12/12 Failure to Construe Claim; Inconsistent Expert Testimony

1:09md02118 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 5/24/11 Validity - Obviousness



1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/20/12 Claim Construction; Jury Instruction - 102(g); Exclusion of Evidence

1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 9.1 8/20/12 Invalidity - Obviousness; Improper Inventorship

1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 8.9 8/20/12 Erroneous Jury Instruction; Evidentiary Error; Weight of the Evidence




Defendant 7.7 9/5/13 Noninfringement - GIP; Invalidity - GIP

1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.1 3/31/14 Invalidity




Defendant 11.2 5/18/15 Invalidity - Anticipation




Defendant 16.3 2/22/16 Noninfringement - Denied; Invalidity - Obviousness




1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.1 3/31/16 167


1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 9.1 3/13/12 Increase Damage Award Amount










168

Preliminary Injunction

There were 34 Preliminary Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 35.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13

3

2

4

2

3

8

2 2

3

2

1

2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Preliminary Injunction
























1:12cv00613 Granted Plaintiff 9.6 3/27/13 169



1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 9/19/12














170

Remand Motion

There were 1 Remand Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

8

1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Remand Motion




171

Sanctions/Attorneys Fees

There were 42 Sanctions/Attorneys Fees contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 33.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 6.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

4

3

6

4

5

2

6

1

2 2

3

4


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion


For Sanctions/Attorneys Fees



1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Post-JudgmentAttorney fees

1:99cv00781 Granted Defendant 8.5 9/19/02 PartialAttorney Fees

1:01cv00401 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/20/02 UnknownwSanctions

1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.1 4/13/06 UnknownSanctions

1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 5/4/04 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees

1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 16.2 8/11/06 35 USC 285Attorney fees



Plaintiff 10.8 1/10/07 Post-JudgmentAttorney fees

1:04cv00305 Denied Defendant 5.0 11/8/06 UnknownSanctions

1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 16.6 3/31/08 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees

1:05cv00506 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 11/14/06 DiscoverySanctions


1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.8 1/28/09 UnknownSanctions

1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 8/2/11 Sanctions

1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.2 8/2/11 Sanctions

1:09md02118 Granted Third Party 7.6 1/12/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees

1:10cv00315 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 3/13/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees


Defendant 5.9 4/25/12 Sanctions

172


Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees





Defendant 0.5 8/7/12 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees

1:11cv00313 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 35 USC 285Attorney Fees


Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 35 USC 285Attorney Fees


Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 Exceptional CaseAttorney Fees



1:13cv00428 Denied Defendant 3.1 11/18/13 Sanctions


1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 3.3 7/23/14 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees




1:12cv00651 Denied Defendant 12.1 9/14/15 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees

1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 11.3 9/10/15 Rule 11Sanctions


Plaintiff 5.7 5/27/15 ContractualAttorney Fees

1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 14.8 3/31/16 35 USC 285Attorney Fees


1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/16 SupplementalAttorney Fees


1:13cv01534 Granted Plaintiff 11.9 5/25/17 35 USC 285Attorney Fees

1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 0.9 4/11/16 Sanctions

1:12cv01491 Denied Plaintiff 9.0 5/26/17 35 USC 285Attorney Fees


173

Sever

There were 29 Sever contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 34.5%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 3 4 5 6 9

4

3

4

8

6

4


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Sever
































175

Stay

There were 133 Stay contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 49.2%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 3.5. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12

32

19 18

9

1614

74

11

1 2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion


For Stay



1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03 UnknownStay of Discovery

1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 8/27/02 Stay of Discovery

1:01cv00801 Granted Defendant 1.1 9/17/04 UnknownStay Execution of Judgment

1:99cv00696 Granted Defendant 0.8 6/11/01 Pending ReexamCase

1:99cv00449 Denied Defendant 8.0 3/21/00 Stay of Litigation

1:99cv00274 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/1/04 Pending AppealCase/Enforcement of Judgment

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Pending post-trial motionsCase/Execution of Judgment

1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation

1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase






1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.0 11/18/05 Pending Resolution of Another Action

Stay of Litigation




Stay of Litigation

176


Stay of Litigation


Defendant 5.7 2/15/05 Pending Resolution of MDL

Stay of Litigation

1:04cv00884 Granted Plaintiff 1.4 4/27/05 Pending other litigationCase

1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05 UnknownStay of Litigation


1:04cv00418 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 11/9/04 Stay of Discovery


1:04cv01293 Granted Defendant 4.1 2/15/05 Pending Resolution of MDL

Stay of Litigation

1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationCase

1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationJudgement

1:02cv01427 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 6/19/03 Other LitigationCase

1:00cv00886 Granted Defendant 6.6 9/25/01 Pending AppealStay of Litigation

1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Pending ArbitrationStay of Lititgation

1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation


Defendant 1.5 4/28/04 UnknownStay of Injunction

1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02 Discovery


Defendant 2.1 2/1/02 Pending Resolution of Another Action

Stay of Litigation

1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 0.4 11/27/02 Pending ReexamCase

1:01cv00387 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/10/02 Pending ReexamCase

1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 0.8 1/29/04 Pending AppealAttorney Fees Motion

1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.1 12/27/02 UnknownStay of Judgement


1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.0 6/7/06 UnknownStay of Injunction

1:04cv00305 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 11/8/06 Pending AppealTrial



1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.1 9/29/03 Pending AppealOrder

1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03 Unknown

1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 6/14/05 Pending Joinder of LitigantStay of Trial



1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 4/13/05 UnknownStay of Litigation



Defendant 6.3 2/24/04 UnknownStay of Discovery


Defendant 6.2 2/24/04 UnknownStay of Litigation

1:03cv00102 Granted Third Party 8.3 12/1/04 UnknownStay of Litigation

1:05cv00768 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/29/06 UnknownStay of Discovery/Litigation

177

1:06cv00530 Denied Defendant 2.3 3/2/07 Pending Resolution of Another Action

Stay of Litigation

1:07cv00251 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/20/07 Pending Resolution of ITCStay of Litigation

1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/10/08 Pending AppealCase/Permanent Injunction

1:06cv00197 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/14/07 Pending SettlementStay of Litigation

1:07cv00843 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/25/08 UnknownStay of Litigation

1:07cv00843 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/11/08 Pending Resolution of ITCStay of Litigation



1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 2/18/09 UnknownCase

1:08cv00889 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 10/2/09 discovery


1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 1.3 8/23/10 UNknownCase

1:09cv00695 Granted Defendant 0.0 11/19/09 Case


1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 5.9 11/22/10 Subject Matter Jurisdiction

1:09cv00872 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 4/6/10 Case

1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 1.5 9/8/10 Pending AppealCase



1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Pending Ruling on AppealCase


Defendant 0.1 6/17/11 Pending ReexamCase

1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction

1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction

1:10cv00123 Granted Plaintiff 1.2 5/5/11 Pending Related LitigationCase

1:10cv00428 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/16/11 Pending MediationCase


1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/22/11 Particular Claims

1:11cv00165 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 Pending MediationCase


1:11cv00303 Denied Defendant 7.6 4/5/12 Claims Against Party

1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 8.2 4/4/12 Pending Related LitigationCase

1:11cv00496 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/25/11 Pending ITC ProceedingCase

1:11cv00623 Denied Plaintiff 11.2 8/28/12 Pending ITC ProceedingCase


Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 Pending Manufacturer SuitClaims Against Party


Defendant 1.4 5/3/12 Pending Related LitigationCase

1:11cv00890 Granted Defendant 5.8 8/7/12 First to File RuleCase

1:12cv00394 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 5/15/12 Pending MDL TransferCase

1:10cv00269 Granted Defendant 0.1 5/4/12 Pending AppealClaims as to One Patent


1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Pending Other LitigationCase178


Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 ConsolidationCase


1:12cv00204 Granted Defendant 4.1 8/7/12 First to File RuleCase





Defendant 8.2 5/8/14 Pending CBM ReviewCase


Plaintiff 6.4 3/12/14 Pending Inter Partes Review

Case

1:12cv01767 Granted Plaintiff 0.9 7/2/13 Pending JPML DecisionCase

1:12cv00301 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Pending ReexamCase

1:12cv00448 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Pending ReexamCase

1:12cv01525 Granted Defendant 4.3 4/24/14 Pending Inter Partes Review

Case

1:06cv00043 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 4/17/14 Pending New CounselCase

1:11cv00054 Granted Defendant 2.5 7/11/14 Pending Related LitigationCase

1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/9/14 Pending Inter Partes Review

Case

1:14cv00014 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 6/9/14 Pending Related LitigationCase




1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 2.3 1/14/15 Pending ReexamDamages

1:14cv00617 Granted Defendant 8.6 7/31/15 Pending Manufacturer Action

Claims Against Particular Parties








Particular Counts


Plaintiff 4.5 3/20/15 Pending Decision on Patent Issues

Counterclaims

1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 0.0 3/25/15 Pending ReexamParticular Count


Case

1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 2.5 10/13/15 Pending Inter Partes Review

Case

1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/9/15 Particular Counts


1:13cv00685 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/19/16 Pending Related LitigationCase



1:16cv00056 Granted Defendant 9.3 7/31/17 Pending Reexam; Pending Appeal

Case

1:16cv00531 Granted Defendant 0.1 10/21/16 Pending ITC ProceedingCase179


1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 0.1 1/9/17 Pending AppealPermanent Injunction

180

Summary Judgment

There were 443 Summary Judgment contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 36.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

3

24

76

148

88

3223 26

91 2 1

10


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion


For Summary Judgment



1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 2.2 1/15/03 Invalidity



1:01cv00077 Granted Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Invalidity

1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Best ModeInvalidity

1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Prior ArtInvalidity



Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 102(g)Invalidity

1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 6.1 6/9/03 InvalidityJudicial Estoppel


1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 112Invalidity

1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 102; AnticipationInvalidity

1:03cv00983 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 102; 103Validity


Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 112Validity


1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 ObviousnessInvalidity

1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity; Content of Prior Art

181

1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Prior ArtInvalidity


1:04cv00067 Denied Defendant 7.9 1/6/06 RecaptureInvalidity



1:03cv01035 Denied Defendant 5.0 6/28/06 IndefinitenessInvalidity

1:04cv01199 Granted Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 102; 103Invalidity

1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Written DescriptionInvalidity

1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 6.7 8/23/07 AnticipationValidity



Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 102(g)Validity


Defendant 7.4 9/29/08 Invalidity

1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity


Defendant 0.9 11/5/08 Invalidity

1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 6.1 4/28/09 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity


1:06cv00105 Granted Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity


Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Anticipation-GIP; Best Mode-Granted; Enablement-Denied; Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted

Validity; Enforceability

1:07cv00333 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description

Invalidity

1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 103; ObviousnessInvalidity



1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 On-Sale; AnticipationInvalidity



Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Anticipation-GIP; Obviousness-Denied

Invalidity

1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 Derivation; Inequitable Conduct

Validity; Enforceability

1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 EnablementInvalidity


Defendant 3.6 10/19/10 35 USC 255-Granted; Indefiniteness-Granted; Anticipation-Denied; Obviousness-Denied

Invalidity



Defendant 3.6 7/26/10 Enablement; Written Description

Invalidity; No Priority Date

1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 ObviousnessInvalidity 182


Defendant 5.0 3/9/11 Indefiniteness-Granted; Anticipation-Denied

Invalidity

1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 11/18/10 Anticipation; ObviousnessPriority Date; Invalidity

1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 AnticipationInvalidity


1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Written Description; Enablement

Invalidity

1:06cv00557 Denied Defendant 4.7 8/26/11 102(g)Invalidity

1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Anticipation; Obviousness; Best Mode

Invalidity

1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 4.1 9/26/11 Written Description; Enablement; Obviousness

Invalidity

1:09cv00627 Denied Defendant 4.2 1/24/12 AnticipationInvalidity; Expiration


Defendant 3.0 8/28/12 Written Description - Granted; Anticipation - Denied

Invalidity - GIP

1:11cv00829 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 101Invalidity


Defendant 5.8 11/8/12 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity


Plaintiff 5.2 11/8/12 Anticipation - GIP; Obviousness - Denied

Validity

1:11cv00827 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 101Invalidity



Defendant 3.6 3/19/13 Anticipation - Denied; Obviousness - Denied; Indefiniteness - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - GIP

Invalidity


Plaintiff 3.1 3/19/13 Anticipation - Denied; Obviousness - Denied; Indefiniteness - Granted; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied

Validity


Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 Written Description - Granted; Enablement - Granted; 102(g)(2) - Denied

Invalidity


Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Validity


Defendant 4.8 9/30/13 Indefiniteness - Granted; Patentable Subject Matter - GIP; Written Description - Denied; Enablement - Denied

Invalidity

1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 7.6 3/31/14 IndefinitenessInvalidity

1:11cv00690 Denied Plaintiff 7.1 3/31/14 IndefinitenessValidity


Defendant 5.3 4/10/14 Anticipation - Denied; Indefiniteness - Granted

Invalidity

183


Defendant 4.4 1/2/14 Obviousness - GIP; Anticipation - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied

Invalidity


1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 5.2 6/30/14 Collateral Estoppel

1:11cv00615 Denied Defendant 4.6 7/22/14 Indefiniteness; AnticipationInvalidity



1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 3.6 8/14/14 Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness

Invalidity

1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 AnticipationInvalidity; Claim Construction


1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 2.5 12/15/14 35 USC 101Invalidity

1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 2.5 12/15/14 35 USC 101Validity

1:12cv00569 Granted Defendant 2.5 2/4/15 AnticipationInvalidity





Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied

Invalidity


Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied

Invalidity

1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied

Invalidity

1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 5.4 11/9/15 Indefiniteness; AnticipationInvalidity


Defendant 5.2 11/9/15 Anticipation - GIP; 101 - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied

Invalidity


Plaintiff 5.2 11/9/15 Anticipation - GIPValidity

1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.0 12/4/15 ObviousnessInvalidity

1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 6.8 4/11/16 35 USC 101Invalidity

1:13cv00453 Granted Defendant 5.0 12/19/16 AnticipationInvalidity; Priority Date

1:13cv02073 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 2/22/17 ObviousnessValidity

1:14cv01482 Granted Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 AnticipationInvalidity


Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 AnticipationInvalidity

1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 LiteralInfringement; Willfulness


Defendant 3.5 1/29/03 Literal-Granted; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied

Noninfringement-GIP; Invalidity-Denied

184


Defendant 3.4 1/29/03 Literal-GIP; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied

Noninfringement

1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Limitation of Damages






Plaintiff 3.6 3/27/03 LiteralInfringement; Validity

1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 5.2 11/12/02 LiteralInfringement


1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 1.5 3/21/03 Noninfringement


Plaintiff 3.6 7/30/03 Noninfringement



1:02cv00156 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 LiteralInfringement




1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement



1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 InducingNoninfringement

1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Prior ArtInvalidity; Noninfringement

1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Prior ArtInvalidity; Noninfringement


Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 Literal-GIP; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied; Doctrine of Equivalents-Granted

Noninfringement


Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 Literal-GIP; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied

Infringement



1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents

Infringement


Infringement


Infringement

1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 LiteralNoninfringement

1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Noninfringement185



Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 LiteralNoninfringement

1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents

Noninfringement

1:95cv00545 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/28/02 Noninfringement





Plaintiff 2.2 5/1/00 Infringement


1:98cv00717 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 6/29/00 Validity; Enforceability; Infringement

1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 AnticipationInvalidity; Noninfringement





1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 Method Steps Partially Performed by the Patentee

Noninfringement





Noninfringement

1:03cv00283 Granted Defendant 12.7 4/4/07 Noninfringement; Invalidity






1:06cv00414 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 LiteralNoninfringement







Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 No Willfulness


Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 LiteralInfringement

186




Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 Literal-Denied; Control-Denied; lnducing-Denied; Contributory-Granted

NonInfringement


Infringement


Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Anticipation-GIP; Best Mode-Granted; Enablement-Denied; Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted

Infringement and Validity

1:07cv00272 Granted Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 Doctrine of Equivalents; Literal

Noninfringement


Plaintiff 24.1 9/15/11 Literal - GIP; Indefiniteness - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied; Anticipation - Denied

Noninfringement - GIP; Invalidity - Denied


Defendant 24.1 9/15/11 Indefiniteness; Enablement; Written Description; Anticipation

Infringement - Denied; Validity - Granted

1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 LiteralNoninfringement




1:08cv00063 Granted Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Patent MarkingLimitation on Damages; No Willfulness



1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 LiteralInfringement



Defendant 4.5 3/30/10 Anticipation; Obviousness; Literal

Invalidity-Denied; Noninfringement-GIP


Noninfringement



Infringement




Infringement


Noninfringement

187




1:08cv00760 Granted Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 LiteralNoninfringement


Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 Literal-Granted; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied

Noninfringement

1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/13/11 Infringement

1:08cv00568 Granted Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 InducingNoninfringement







1:06cv00557 Granted Defendant 0.9 8/26/11 No Willfulness










Defendant 3.1 3/19/13 Doctrine of EquivalentsNoninfringement







1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Estoppel






188


Plaintiff 5.3 4/10/14 ObviousnessInfringement - Denied; Validity - Granted



















1:08cv00889 Granted Defendant 1.8 8/14/14 No Willfulness

1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 Collateral EstoppelNoninfringement










1:12cv01036 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 DOENoninfringement; No Willfulness


1:12cv01200 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 Noninfringement; No Willfulness


1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 DOENoninfringement; No Willfulness


189




1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 IndefinitenessInvalidity; Noninfringement



Defendant 4.4 2/22/17 Direct; IndirectNoninfringement





Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Noninfringement - GIP; No Willfulness - Denied


1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Content of Prior Art

1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Prior ArtValidity




1:00cv01013 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 5/16/01 No License


Plaintiff 8.4 9/30/02 Validity; No License


1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 1/14/03 No Prosecution Laches


1:01cv00148 Granted Defendant 3.8 10/22/02 No Patent Misuse

1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Patent MisuseUnenforceability

1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Inequitable ConductUnenforceability

1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Lack of Standing

1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Prosecution Laches

1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 EnablementInvalidity


Plaintiff 2.9 7/30/02 Literal-Granted; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied

Infringement


1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Anticipation; On-Sale; Public use; Obviousness

Validity



1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description

Invalidity

190

1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Enforce Settlement Agreement

1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 Inequitable ConductEnforceability

1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 On-Sale; AnticipationValidity



1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 7/30/03 No Lanham Act Violation; No Unfair Competition

1:01cv00801 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 7/30/03 Anticipation; On-SaleInvalidity




1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 No License

1:01cv00882 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Prior ArtValidity

1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Inequitable ConductEnforceability

1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Best ModeValidity

1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 License

1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 1/5/04 IndefinitenessValidity


1:02cv00156 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 Anticipation; On-SaleValidity

1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Laches


Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Lost ProfitsLimitation of Damages


1:02cv00332 Granted Defendant 4.5 6/9/03 ValidityNo Judicial Estoppel

1:02cv00332 Denied Defendant 3.2 6/9/03 No Priority Date; Judicial Estoppel

1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 6/9/03 Priority Date; No Judicial Estoppel


Plaintiff 3.3 11/19/04 Infringement-Denied; Validity-Granted


Plaintiff 3.4 11/22/04 Infringement; Validity


Defendant 3.3 11/19/04 Double PatentingInvalidity


Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 102(e); 102(g)Invalidity


Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 AnticipationInvalidity

191

1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Written DescriptionInvalidity

1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 112-2Invalidity

1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 7.2 3/18/05 Inequitable ConductEnforceability


Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Validity


1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Lost ProfitsLimitation on Damages

1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Lack of Remedy



Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 AnticipationValidity

1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Doctrine of EquivalentsNoninfringement



1:03cv00528 Granted Defendant 4.4 2/24/04 271(g)Noninfringement


Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 No Unfair Competition


Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 No Tortious Interference


Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel; No Implied License

1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 Inequitable ConductEnforceability

1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Lost Profits; MarkingLimitation on Damages; No Willfulness

1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Implied License

1:03cv01067 Granted Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 287(a)Limitation on Damages




Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 IndefinitenessInvalidity


1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.5 10/19/06 Lack of Standing




1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Priority Date


Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Enforceability

1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 3.3 9/21/04 Prosecution History Estoppel

192

1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 1/27/05 ObviousnessInvalidity


Plaintiff 6.5 9/29/00 No Unfair Competition


Plaintiff 2.7 2/20/01 Limitation on Damages; No Injunction; No Attorney Fees

1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/17/04 Collateral Estoppel


1:98cv00336 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel


Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 Validity








1:99cv00301 Granted Defendant 2.6 12/14/00 No Tortious Interference

1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 IndefinitenessValidity


1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 On-Sale; AnticipationInvalidity


1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Content of Prior Art



Defendant 6.1 7/31/06 Unenforceability

1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 EnablementInvalidity


1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel

1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/5/06 Laches; Equitable Estoppel

1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Inequitable ConductUnenforceability

1:04cv01199 Denied Plaintiff 4.0 10/17/06 Printed PublicationContent of Prior Art

1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 12.7 4/4/07 AnticipationValidity

1:05cv00356 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 1/5/07 AnticipationInvalidity

193


Plaintiff 6.6 8/23/07 PreemptionNo Fraud-Denied; No Unfair Competition-Granted; No Equitable or Promissory Estoppel-Denied; No Implied License-Denied

1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 3.4 11/20/07 Breach of Contract


1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 Incorporation by Reference

1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 No Breach of Contract


Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Inequitable ConductEnforceability


Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel; No Prosecution Laches

1:02cv01512 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 8/18/08 Relevant Market


Plaintiff 4.7 9/25/08 No Sham Litigation


Defendant 4.1 12/4/08 AnticipationValidity




Plaintiff 1.4 11/5/08 Inequitable ConductEnforceability


Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 Failure to MarkLaches; Equitable Estoppel; Limitation on Damages


Plaintiff 0.9 11/5/08 112Validity

1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 Anticipation; ObviousnessValidity

1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 ImpliedNo License

1:08cv00779 Denied Plaintiff 8.3 7/22/09 Collateral Estoppel; Res Judicata; Infringement

1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 5.1 4/28/09 ImpliedLicense


Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 IndefinitenessInvalidity



1:07cv00826 Granted Defendant 17.4 5/31/11 101; Subject MatterInvalidity

1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Statute of Limitations

194

1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Best ModeValidity





1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Written DescriptionValidity


Plaintiff 5.0 3/9/11 Indefiniteness-Denied; Anticipation-Denied; Obviousness-Granted

Validity

1:09cv00264 Granted Plaintiff 4.3 1/20/11 Double PatentingValidity

1:09cv00264 Granted Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 False Marking

1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 2.8 4/13/11 Reasonable Royalty; Date of Hypothetical Negotiation

Limitation on Damages

1:11cv00131 Denied Defendant 10.6 3/30/12 Res Judicata






Defendant 4.5 6/19/12 Anticipation - DeniedPatent Exhaustion - Granted; Priority Date - Denied; Invalidity - Denied; Noninfringement - Granted


1:10cv00258 Granted Plaintiff 5.8 11/8/12 Equitable Estoppel; Waiver; Prosecution History Estoppel


1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Patent Exhaustion

1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Unfair Competition; Unclean Hands

1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No Patent Exhaustion

1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.1 9/13/12 No Trademark Violation; No False Designation; No Trade Dress Violation; No Unfair Trade Practices; No False Advertising

1:10cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No False Advertising


1:13cv00576 Denied Plaintiff 3.3 7/26/13 Enablement; Written Description; 102(g)(2)

Validity



195

1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 3.6 6/25/13 Obviousness; Written Description; Enablement

Invalidity


Plaintiff 3.0 6/25/13 Obviousness - Granted; Written Description - GIP; Enablement - GIP; Indefiniteness - Denied

Validity



1:10cv00503 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Content of Prior Art


Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 License

1:10cv00658 Denied Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Exhaustion

1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Breach of Contract

1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Exhaustion


Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No License

1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 Anticipation; IndefinitenessValidity


Plaintiff 4.9 10/4/13 No License


Plaintiff 4.8 10/16/13 AnticipationValidity

1:11cv01258 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 2/6/14 Assignor Estoppel

1:12cv00282 Granted Defendant 3.4 5/14/14 Indefiniteness; Enablement; Written Description

Invalidity

1:12cv00930 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/14/14 Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness

Validity


1:12cv00487 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 5/15/15 IndefinitenessInvalidity








1:13cv00693 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 11/25/14 Anticipation; FunctionalityValidity; Not Exceptional Case

1:14cv00194 Granted Defendant 1.8 2/5/15 No Provisional Rights

1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 1.4 2/24/15 101; IndefinitenessInvalidity


Plaintiff 7.6 3/21/16 Literal - Granted; DOE - Denied without prejudice

Noninfringement

1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity; Laches; Noninfringement

196


Plaintiff 4.8 4/11/16 Content of Prior Art



Plaintiff 5.0 12/19/16 Anticipation; ObviousnessNo Available Noninfringing Alternatives (Denied); Validity (Denied); Reference Estoppel (GIP)

1:13cv00685 Granted Defendant 5.1 1/19/17 Collateral EstoppelNoninfringement


Plaintiff 4.4 2/22/17 102(a) (Granted); Obviousness (Granted); 102(g) Denied)

Validity



197

Temporary Restraining Order Motion

There were 6 Temporary Restraining Order Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 13

4

1 1


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Temporary Restraining Order Motion





1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/24/11





198

Transfer Motion

There were 81 Transfer Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 29.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.3. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

3

11

64

1517

7

43

5

13

2


Nu

mb

er

of

De

cis

ion

s

Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Transfer Motion

























1:05cv00201 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/13/05 199
















201

LegalMetric Individual Judge Report

Documents

Transcript of LegalMetric Individual Judge Report