Individual Funding Requests - Birmingham and Solihull CCG
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Individual Funding Requests - Birmingham and Solihull CCG
Midlands and Lancashire CSU Kingston House, 438-450 High Street West Bromwich B70 9LD
www.midlandsandlancashire csu.nhs.uk
Individual Funding Requests
Birmingham South Central CCG Annual Report
1 April 2013 – 31 March 2014
IFR Summary for Birmingham South Central CCG Annual Report – 1 April 2013 – 31 March 2014
Central Midlands Commissioning Support Unit (CMCSU) was commissioned by Birmingham South Central CCG to process all applications for funding through the Individual Funding Requests (IFR) and Prior Approvals (PA) process.
“The individual funding request process is the means by which the CCG takes into account and prioritises requests for individuals with unusual clinical circumstances, which cannot be accommodated through its other commissioning processes. Being part of the CCG’s priority setting processes, the decisions taken by the IFR Panel must be guided by the same principles as priority setting in the rest of the organisation. These are set out in the CCG’s Ethical framework for priority setting and resource allocation document. These principles include taking affordability and relative priority vis-à-vis other needs into account.” IFR Policy
Prior Approvals are requests for funding that are assessed against pre-determined clinical criteria; these can be Procedures of Limited Clinical Value (PLCV), which are assessed against CCG Clinical Commissioning Policies, or applications for drugs, which are assessed against NICE Technical Appraisal Guidance (TAGs) During the period from 01 April 2013 to 31 March 2014, the CSU processed 407 applications on behalf of the CCG.
Approved Closed / Withdrawn Declined Total
IFR 8 12 7 27
Criteria Based* 286 10 57 353
NICE 23 2 1 26
NHSE 0 1 0 1
TOTAL 317 25 65 407
*criteria based requests include PLCV, Aesthetics, IVF and any other treatment that falls into a commissioned
policy.
IFR Screening Panel These panels are held weekly and membership comprises of an IFR Manager (CMCSU), a Public Health Consultant (Local Authority) and a Senior Pharmacist (CCG or CMCSU). The CCG has delegated authority that the IFR Screening Panel can made decisions against policy on all requests that are presented to IFR Screening Panel. For any cases where there is no specific clinical commissioning policy approved by the CCG, or NICE TAG, the IFR Screening Panel will review the cases to determine whether exceptionality could be demonstrated from the information provided by the referring clinician. They will also review to determine additional information that may be required to make a fully informed decision on funding prior to referring the case to the Full IFR Panel. 20 cases were reviewed by the IFR Screening Panel during the period of this report:
Month 13/14 Approved Closed Declined Total
Apr-13 0 0 1 1
May-13 1* 0 3 4
Jun-13 2 0 1** 3
Jul-13 1** 0 1 2
Aug-13 0 0 3 3
Sep-13 0 0 0 0
Oct-13 0 0 1 1
Nov-13 0 0 0 0
Dec-13 0 0 1 1
Jan-14 1** 0 0 1
Feb-14 0 1 2 3
Mar-14 0 0 1 1
** - cases also reviewed at Full Panel * N.B. The date is when the application was originally submitted and not the date of the panel meeting.
0
1
2
3
4
5
Ap
r-1
3
Ma
y-1
3
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3
De
c-13
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Ma
r-14
Nu
mb
er
of
app
licat
ion
s
Month
Outcomes of the applications reviewed at IFR Screening panel by Month
Closed
Declined
Approved
Full IFR Panel The Full IFR Panel is scheduled monthly and panel membership contains at least one member of the CCG as the ‘accountable officer’ for the decision made by the panel. The panel consists of a Senior Pharmacist (CCG or CMCSU), a GP (CCG), a Consultant in Public Health (Local Authority), Head of IFR’s (CMCSU) and an IFR Case Manager. Their remit is to consider IFR cases that have been screened and where clinical exceptionality is highlighted, the clinical evidence and cost effectiveness is discussed to enable the Clinical Commissioning Group member to reach a decision in any particular case. 4 cases were referred to a Full IFR Panel for a decision; three cases were approved and one case declined.
IFR Appeals Panel Should an appeal be received, the role of the IFR Appeal panel is to consider appeals against decisions taken by the CCG ensuring decisions have been taken in accordance with the policies and processes of the CCG and CMCSU. The appeal panel can uphold the decision made by Birmingham South Central CCG or may refer the case back to IFR Panel for reconsideration with recommendations. The IFR Appeal Panel membership consists of a Lay Member/Chair of Birmingham South Central CCG, a Board Member GP from the CCG and the Director of Public Health (Local Authority). No formal appeals have been received for Birmingham South Central CCG cases during the period contained within this report. Reasons for Approval of Treatment Approvals for treatment are supported when a patient meets the clinical criteria outlined in a specific commissioning policy or the patient is deemed to be clinically exceptional, an example of this may be a patient who requires carpal tunnel surgery (Procedure of Limited Clinical Value). Providing they meet the criteria, NHS funding is approved. Alternatively, if a patient does not meet the specified criteria, or there are no criteria or commissioning policy in place to assess against, clinicians may apply on the grounds of exceptionality. An example of this type of request
was for a Diaport machine for a patient with uncontrollable diabetes. Funding was approved as the patient was deemed to be clinically exceptional as there were no other patients identified in South Birmingham CCG, or surrounding areas, with the same clinical condition and circumstances. Reasons for Refusal of Treatment There are a variety of reasons why funding is not supported and these include:
• Patient does not meet the clinical criteria.
• Patient is not deemed to be clinically exceptional.
• Incomplete/poor application from Clinicians.
• Additional supporting information requested, but not received.
• Lack of clinical evidence to support the request.
• Identified as a Service Development, when it is recognised that a cohort of patients may benefit from the treatment.
• Requests for treatment are commissioned by NHS England.
Decisions Made by Type of Request:
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
criteria base IFR NHS England NICE Guidance
nu
mb
er
of
app
licat
ion
s
type of request
Type of applications reviewed by IFR team
0
5
10
15
Approved closed Declined
8
12
7
IFR Applications
0
100
200
300
Approved closed Declined
nu
mb
er o
f re
qu
ests
Decision
Outcomes for the criteria base applications
0
10
20
30
Approved closed Declined
23
2 1
Outcomes for the NICE Criteria
0
0.5
1
Approved Declined Closed
0 0
1
Outcomes for the NHS England applications
criteria base, 353
NICE Guidance,
26
Criteria base applications
criteria base applications are requests that are reviewed in line with a commissiooning policy, this includes IVF, PLCV and Aesthetic
Total Applications received by procedure
Total Applications received by date The IFR team received an average of 34 cases per month.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Ab
do
min
opl
asty
AD
HD
Ref
erra
l
An
ti-T
NF
Trea
tmen
t
An
ti-T
NF
Trea
tmen
t
Art
hro
sco
py
of
Kn
ee jo
int
Ble
ph
aro
pla
sty
Bo
tulin
um
to
xic
Bre
ast
red
uct
ion
Bre
ast
surg
ery
Car
pal
Tu
nne
l Su
rger
y
Co
lon
osc
op
y
Co
nd
uct
ive
Edu
cati
on
D&
C
Do
nor
inse
min
atio
n
Ear
Rec
on
stru
ctio
n
Exci
sio
n o
f A
nal
Ski
n T
ags
Exci
sio
n o
f ga
ngl
ion
cys
t
Exci
sio
n o
f lip
om
a
Exci
sio
n o
f m
uco
id c
yst
Exci
sio
n o
f Se
bace
ou
s C
yst
Exci
sio
n o
f sk
in le
sio
n
Face
t Jo
int
Inje
ctio
n
Fert
ility
Pre
serv
atio
n
Flex
ible
Sig
mo
ido
sco
py
Flu
pirt
ine
Tab
lets
Gal
lsto
ne s
urg
ery
Gen
ital
su
rger
y
Gro
mm
ets
Hae
mo
rrh
oid
ecto
my
Hyp
erb
aric
Tre
atm
ent
Ingu
inal
Her
nia
Rep
air
Inse
rtio
n o
f In
sulin
Del
iver
y Po
rt
Insu
lin P
um
p a
nd
Co
nsu
mab
les
IVF/
ICSI
tre
atm
ent
Lab
iap
last
y
Lase
r H
air
Rem
ova
l
Lase
r re
surf
acin
g
Lase
r Tr
eatm
ent
Liga
men
t re
con
stru
ctio
n
Mic
ro-n
eed
ling
ther
apy
MR
-gu
ided
Fo
cuse
d U
ltra
sou
nd
MR
I sca
n
NIV
Mac
hin
e
Ort
ho
tic
Trea
tmen
t
Ozu
rdex
Tre
atm
ent
Pal
mar
Fas
ciec
tom
y
PET
sca
n
Pin
nap
last
y
Pla
stic
rem
ova
l
Rem
ova
l of
no
se p
ierc
ing
Rev
isio
n o
f sc
ar/k
elo
id
Rh
ino
pla
sty
Rit
uxi
mab
Tre
atm
ent
Sigm
oid
osc
op
y
TIL
ther
apy
Ton
sille
cto
my
Tota
l Hip
Rep
lace
men
t
Tota
l hys
tere
cto
my
Tota
l kn
ee r
epla
cem
ent
Trig
ger
fing
er s
urg
ery
Vas
cula
r Sk
in L
esio
ns
nu
mb
er
of
app
licat
ion
s
Name of procedure
Total Number of Applications by Procedure
criteria base IFR NHS England NICE Guidance
The IFR team received an average of 3 IFR applications per month:
The IFR team received an average of 2 applications for funding, for review against NICE TAGs per month:
The IFR team received an average of 29 applications for review against criteria per month:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nu
mb
er o
f a
pp
lica
tio
ns
Months 2013/14
Criteria Based applications reviewed by Month
crit
eria
bas
e
IFR
NH
S En
glan
d
NIC
E G
uid
ance
Gra
nd
To
tal
Abdominoplasty 4 4
ADHD Referral 1 1
Anti-TNF Treatment 2 3 12 17
Anti-TNF Treatment 2 2
Arthroscopy of Knee joint 47 47
Blepharoplasty 1 1
Botulinum toxic 1 1
Breast reduction 1 1
Breast surgery 1 1
Carpal Tunnel Surgery 32 32
Colonoscopy 7 7
Conductive Education 1 1
D&C 3 3
Donor insemination 1 1
Ear Reconstruction 1 1
Excision of Anal Skin Tags 1 1
Excision of ganglion cyst 8 8
Excision of lipoma 4 4
Excision of mucoid cyst 1 1
Excision of Sebaceous Cyst 7 7
Excision of skin lesion 9 9
Facet Joint Injection 4 4
Fertility Preservation 1 1
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy 3 3
Flupirtine Tablets 1 1
Gallstone surgery 1 1
Genital surgery 2 2
Grommets 4 4
Haemorrhoidectomy 6 6
Hyperbaric Treatment 1 1
Inguinal Hernia Repair 19 19
Insertion of Insulin Delivery Port 2 2
Insulin Pump and Consumables 7 7
IVF/ICSI treatment 9 1 10
Labiaplasty 3 3
Laser Hair Removal 37 1 38
Laser resurfacing 4 4
Laser Treatment 13 13
Ligament reconstruction 1 1
Micro-needling therapy 2 2
MR-guided Focused Ultrasound 1 1
MRI scan 1 1
Source of Referrals
Applications for funding were received from 28 different referrers / providers, with almost 52% of the referrals being received from Highest Referrer. The top five referring organisations were:
criteria base IFR
NHS England
NICE Guidance Grand Total
BMI The Edgbaston Hospital 211 211 52%
S&WB 50 2 8 60 15%
HoEFT 39 1 13 53 13%
University Hospital Birmingham 15 9 0 1 25 6%
Laurie Pike Health Centre 11 11 3%
Sub-Total 326 12 0 22 360 89%
NIV Machine 8 8
Orthotic Treatment 1 1
Ozurdex Treatment 1 4 5
Palmar Fasciectomy 10 10
PET scan 1 1
Pinnaplasty 1 1
Plastic removal 1 1
Removal of nose piercing 1 1
Revision of scar/keloid 9 9
Rhinoplasty 5 5
Rituximab Treatment 1 1 2
Sigmoidoscopy 4 4
TIL therapy 2 2
Tonsillectomy 5 5
Total Hip Replacement 22 22
Total hysterectomy 9 1 10
Total knee replacement 35 35
Trigger finger surgery 10 10
Vascular Skin Lesions 1 1
Grand Total 353 27 1 26 407
IFR Training
During 2013-14, the IFR provided four IFR Training sessions, including legal advice on the processing of applications and one IFR Masterclass. The following BSC CCG staff attended the IFR Training programme:
Alima Batchelor Medicines Management Lead
Richard Mendelsohn GP
Waleed Doski GP
Simon Doble Commissioner
Chrissy Tate Administrator
18 attendees from Birmingham/Solihull Public Health were also trained in the IFR process. 1 CCG member and 3 Birmingham Public Health colleagues attended the IFR Masterclass, which was provided by CMCSU to provide advanced training to support the processing of complex IFR applications.
0
50
100
150
200
250
Applications Received by Referrer
criteria base IFR NHS England NICE Guidance
Report produced by: Individual Funding Requests (IFR) Team, Central Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Kingston House, 438-450 High Street, West Bromwich, West Midlands. B70 9LD Harinder Kaur – Senior IFR Manager Terri-Ann Millington – IFR Case Manager