Funeral Sculpture of Medieval China and its influence on the art of Nomadic peoples: (Text of the...
Transcript of Funeral Sculpture of Medieval China and its influence on the art of Nomadic peoples: (Text of the...
Komissarov Sergey , Soloviev Alexandr
Funeral Sculpture
of Medieval China and its influence on the art of Nomadic peoples
(prepared with financial help of Russian Fund for Humanities, project No. 05-01-01190)
Tradition of large-scale stone statues with quiet universal meaning for mounting of graves is widely spread all over the world. For clarification of semantic content of sculptural burial constructions the structure of funeral complexes as well as surrounding landscape characteristics are very essential. The using of funeral sculptures has a long history in China. It began with well-known stone statutes of Huo Qubing Mausoleum (died at 117 BC). Some characteristics of this complex resemble s. c. Scythian-Siberian «animal style» in art.
Stone bixie at the mausoleum of Xiao Daosheng, father of the Emperor Ming-di, Southern Qi (at Nanjing)
We suppose these Chinese complexes of Medieval Epoch reveal close similarity with funeral-ritual relics of nomadic tribes in Siberia and Central Asia. There are a lot of finds on the territories of Mongolia and Russian Altai region. Here we presented materials investigated and published by our colleagues from Sino-Mongolian joint archaeological expedition and late Dr. Vladimir D. Kubarev.
Many stone sculptures were found at Xinjiang. We present here the materials of Dr. Wang Bo from Xinjiang Regional Museum with our special acknowledgments for his great help. We also added some new pictures obtained at the beginning of this month during our visit to Aletai Prefecture of Xinjiang (mostly at Kanas Lake). All these statutes were connected with stone constructions – graves and special places for memorial rituals.
Stone sculpting in Xinjiang was developing during more than two thousand years. This tradition began from Chemurchek Culture of Bronze Age (second half of 3rd – first half of 2nd millennium BC). Very specific statutes of this culture previously were supposed to be the remains of Turk, but their stylistic and technique of manufacturing differ very much. (Aleksey Kovalev pointed out the similar statutes in the Late Neolithic cultures of France and Swiss and approved them as an origin of Chemurchek Culture).
Stone sculptures from Qinghe County (left – from Samute, Chemurchek Culture;
right – Kungaite, Turk;s Period)
• Tradition had its continuation in Scythian period when figurative sculptures were replaced by s. c. Stag Stones that preserved the same function in funeral rituals. And then, on this bases “Kamennaya Babas” of Turk peoples came into being.
• On the early stages of its development sculpting tradition of ancient Xinjiang could influence the art of Zhou and Qin dynasties. But in the Medieval Epoch the main direction of influence (at last, in this sphere) changed. Some of Chinese burial customs including its sacral function and connection with social status of the dead was adopted by some “barbarian” tribes.
• During the Early Medieval Epoch “the barbarians” tried to reproduce the visual characteristics of funeral ensembles of their “civilized” neighbors. Monuments of the Ancient Turks in Mongolia give us good examples of this kind, especially the Tomb of Kyul-tegin. We can see there the steles in Chinese style, stone base in the shape of tortoise and so on.
• By the way, we can point out some external influence at other sites of Mongolia and Xinjiang, f.e. stone “lion” from Shiveet-Ulan, or barbed man from Qiaoati (the skill in manufacturing of statutes varies because some of them could be manufactured by Chinese of Sogdian craftsmen captured by nomads). As for Chinese funeral tradition, it was presented in most developed form by famous complex of Shisanling of Ming Dynasty. F. e., Spirit Paths contains also pavilions for rituals including funeral feast.