Finite element analysis of a injection blow molding process for ...

8
- 5 - , 12 3 , 2018 J. Korea Society of Die & Mold Engineering, Vol.12 No.3, 2018 ISSN 2092-9692 (Injection Blow Molding, IBM) (preform) . 2 . , 1 (single-stage blow molding, SBM) . 2 (two-stage blow molding, TBM) 1. : E-mail: [email protected] (stretch) 1) . 2 1 . . . Schmidt et al. (visco-elastic) 2) . 1, Finite element analysis of a injection blow molding process for the thick-walled PET bottle Seok-Kwan Hong Min-Jae Song Young-Bae Ko Baeg-Soon Cha Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Molds & Dies R&D Group 1, (Received October 30, 2018 / Revised November 22, 2018 / Accepted December 01, 2018) Abstract: Plastic containers which provides the opportunity to reduce transportation costs are lighter and less brittle than glass containers. As a results, efforts to replace glass with plastic are ongoing. The blow molding method is a typical approach in producing plastic containers. Single-stage injection blow molding (ISBM) is one of the blow molding methods. However, the difficulty in controlling the temperature during the injection molding process is considered its main disadvantage. In this study, ISBM process analysis of relatively thick walled containers such as cosmetic containers is carried out. The initial temperature distribution of the preform is deemed to be the most influential factor in the accuracy of blow molding for the thick vessel. In order to accurately predict this, all heat transfer processes of the preform are considered. The validity of this analytical procedure is verified by comparing the cross-sectional thickness with the actual product. Finally, the validated analytical method is used to evaluate the factors affecting the thickness of the final molded part. The ISBM analysis technique for thick walled vessels developed through this study can be used as an effective predictor for preform design and blow process. Key Words: Blow molding, FEM, Injection molding, ISBM

Transcript of Finite element analysis of a injection blow molding process for ...

- 5 -

, 12 3 , 2018J. Korea Society of Die & Mold Engineering, Vol.12 No.3, 2018 ISSN 2092-9692

- 1 -

(Injection Blow Molding, IBM)(preform)

. 2. , 1

(single-stage blow molding, SBM)

. 2(two-stage blow molding, TBM)

1. :

E-mail: [email protected]

(stretch)1). 2

1

.

.

. Schmidt et al. (visco-elastic)

2).

1,

Finite element analysis of a injection blow molding processfor the thick-walled PET bottle

Seok-Kwan Hong Min-Jae Song Young-Bae Ko Baeg-Soon ChaKorea Institute of Industrial Technology, Molds & Dies R&D Group1,

(Received October 30, 2018 / Revised November 22, 2018 / Accepted December 01, 2018)

Abstract: Plastic containers which provides the opportunity to reduce transportation costs are lighter and less brittle than glass containers. As a results, efforts to replace glass with plastic are ongoing. The blow molding method is a typical approach in producing plastic containers. Single-stage injection blow molding (ISBM) is one of the blow molding methods. However, the difficulty in controlling the temperature during the injection molding process is considered its main disadvantage. In this study, ISBM process analysis of relatively thick walled containers such as cosmetic containers is carried out. The initial temperature distribution of the preform is deemed to be the most influential factor in the accuracy of blow molding for the thick vessel. In order to accurately predict this, all heat transfer processes of the preform are considered. The validity of this analytical procedure is verified by comparing the cross-sectional thickness with the actual product. Finally, the validated analytical method is used to evaluate the factors affecting the thickness of the final molded part. The ISBM analysis technique for thick walled vessels developed through this study can be used as an effective predictor for preform design and blow process.

Key Words: Blow molding, FEM, Injection molding, ISBM

- 6 -

- 2 -

Wang et al., (visco-plastic)

3D TBM , 3). Yang

et al. glass rubber model TBM ABAQUS

4).

. Haessly and RYAN (hyper elastic)

5). .

Pham et al PET(stain rate) biaxial stretching test

6). (visco-hyper elastic) TBM

3 BLOWSIM . Cosson et al

microstructure evolution (simple visco-plastic)

(molecular orientation) (crystallinity). free blow

7). McEVOY et al. TBM ABAQUS

8). Shell solid .

(elasto-viscoplasticity). Chung ABAQUS

9). TBM (elasto-viscoplasticity)

. Debbaut et al. HDPE(viscoelastic fluid)

310). (parison)

. Biglione et al. SBM POLYFLOW PP Cross

11). . Gupta et

al. PET 2D

12). (cosmetic glass container)

STM .

. (thick wall).

. SBM

.

(mapping) .

SBM Fig. 190

. , ,

. .

TBM

- 7 -

- 3 -

.

.

. MOLDFLOW Fig. 2

. 85ml 2

. Eastman Chemical

Products PETG . PETGPET

sheet CHDM (1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol)

. PETG

, ,

13).

270 , 20 , 80% , 4 .

1.7 . Table 1.

Conditions Value

Mold temp 26

Melt temp 260

Injection time (sec) 1.7

Packing control methodtime (sec) 4

ratio (%) 80

Cooling time (sec) 46

Fig. 4. PET

208 ,

.

- 8 -

- 4 -

, (gate)

. ANSYS.

(mapping) . Fig. 5 32D-

.

13 , 10

W/m2 . Fig. 6.

207.

8 183.5 24.3.

POLYFLOW. Eastman Chemical

products Easter Copolyester 676381 .

non-Newtonian viscosity modified Cross law 14).

MOLDFLOW15).

modified Cross law.

Shear rate

(1)

(2)

. , , , T, T* ,

, n , 0 A1, A2, D1

. Table 2 .

Description Value Unitn 0.1926τ* 563860 Pa.D1 9.9606e11 Pa.sD2 355.8 KA1 26.554A2 51.7 K

- 9 -

- 5 -

Fig. 6. (gate cutting)

(support ring) .

(bottom core)

.

.

Fig. 7.

.

, .

Figure 8 . 0 1 bottom core

1 3

. 3.3

.

. .

90

.

- 10 -

- 6 -

Fig. 9.

(neck) bottom 12 point0.01 mm . Fig.

10.

.

SBM Fig. 11

.

. (injection time)(Velocity/Pressure switchover),

(Packing pressure).

( ).

.

. 26 , 36 , 46 ( ), 56 4

. Fig. 12 ~ Fig. 14

. Fig. 12 26

.

.

. 56 Fig. 14(

).

,

.

- 11 -

- 7 -

(blow pressure rate) Fig. 15 .

1.5MPa/0.5s, 1.5MPa/0.05s 1.5MPa/1.0s

. .

(blow mold temperature) Fig. 16 .

.

.

SBM .

.

. SBM

. , ,

- 12 -

- 8 -

.

. SBM

.

“ ” “PET ISBM ”

( : 10048348), ( )

.

1) Seung-Hyun Cho1, Min-Jae Song, Dong-Won Lee, Young-Bae KO, “Numerical study on the blowing deformation characteristics of a square shaped preform”, J. Korea Society of Die & Mold Engineering, Vol.9 No.3, 2015.

2) F.M schmidt, J. F. Agassant, M Bellet, “Experimental study and Numerical Simulation of the injection stretch/blow molding process.”, Polymer Eng. Sci. 38, 1399, 1998.

3) S. Wang, A. Makinouchi, M. Okamoto, T. Kokata, M. Maeshima, N. Ibe, and T. Nakagawa, Int. Polymer Processing 166, 2000.

4) Z. J. Yang, E. Harkin-Jones, G.H. Menary and C.G. Armstrong, “A Non-Isothermal Finite element Model for injection stretch-blow molding of PET Bottles With Parametic studies”, Polymer engineering and science, 1379-1390, vol. 44. No.7

5) W.P. Haessly and M.E. Ryan, “Experimental study and finite element analysis of the Injection blow molding process.”, Polymer engineering and science,

vol.33, no.19, pp. 1279-1287, 1993. 6) X. T, Pham, F. Thibault and L. T, Lim,

“Modeling and simulation of stretch blow molding of polyethylene Terephthalate”, Polymer engineering and science, pp. 1460-1472, vol.44, no.8, 2004.

7) Benoit Cosson, Luc Chevalier, Gilles Régnier, “Simulation of the stretch blow moulding process: from the modelling of the microstructure evolution to the end-use elastic properties of polyethylene terephthalate bottles”, International Journal of Material Forming , Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 39-53, March 2012.

8) J. P. McEvoy, C. G. Armstrong, R. J. Crawford, “Simulation of the stretch blow molding process of pet bottles”, Advances in polymer technology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 339-352, 1998.

9) Kwansoo Chung, “Finite Element Simulation of PET Stretch/Blow-Molding Process”, J. Materials Shaping Technology, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 229-239, 1989.

10) BENOIT DEBBAUT and OLMER HOMERIN and NOOR JIVRAJ, “A Comparison Between Experiments and Predictions for the Blow Molding of an Industrial Part”, POLYMER ENGjNEERlNG AND SCIENCE, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 1812-1822, 1999.

11) J. Biglione, Y. B´ereaux, J.-Y. Charmeau, J. Balcaen, S. Chhay, “Numerical simulation and optimization of the injection blow molding of polypropylene bottles - a single stage process”, Int J Mater Form, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 471-487, 2016.

12) Shubham Gupta, Vikram Uday, Amit Singh Raghuwanshi, Samarth Chowkshey, Shakti Nath Das, S. Suresh, “Simulation of Blow Molding Using Ansys Polyflow”, APCBEE Procedia, Volume 5, pp. 468-473, 2013.

13) Luciano Piergiovanni, Sara Limbo, “Food Packaging Materials”, SPRINGER, pp. 41-42, 2016.

14) Shubham Gupta, Vikram Uday, Amit Singh Raghuwanshi, Samarth Chowkshey, Shakti Nath, S. Suresh, “Simulation of Blow Molding Using Ansys Polyflow”, APCBEE Procedia, Volume 5, pp. 468-473, 2013.

15) MoldFlow Plastic Insight User Manual, 2013.