Factors Impacting Completion In a Community College Distance Learning Environment
Transcript of Factors Impacting Completion In a Community College Distance Learning Environment
Factors Impacting Completion in
a Community College Distance
Learning Environment,
1997-2004
Dr. Valerie C. Bryan
College of Education
Florida Atlantic University
United States
Ms. Jacqueline A. Johnson
Indian River Community College
United States
Bryan, V. & Johnson, J. (2006). Factors Impacting Completion in a Community College
Distance Learning Environment, 1997-2004. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp.
3362-3365). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
(AACE).
3-19-2006
Significance of the Problem
The community college must provide educational opportunities to meet the needs of the students by keeping up with rapid worldwide expansion of technology while staying focused on student success.
To provide the best technology possible to assure students’ success, the institution must examine various technological modalities in distance education to determine those that are most effective with a diverse student population that strives to prepare for an ever-changing world.
Literature
Literature attests to rapid growth for Internet/Web courses
and increase in interactive television courses, but the rate
of growth for telecourses has declined. (Seppanen & Stern,
1999)
Brewer (1997) stressed the need for more research to be
done on the distance education learner in order to
understand factors relating to student success.
In spite of a rather lengthy history, distance education has
not been researched extensively (Zirkle, 2003).
Literature
Thelkeld & Brzoska (1994): “Adults who are most likely to complete courses using distance technology have a cluster of important characteristics, [including] need for autonomy and an ability to be flexible.”
Ellis and Stebbins (1996) found that open-door policies of community colleges create problems in providing quality programs that will ensure student success for an increasingly diverse student population.
MacWilliams (2000) emphasized that universal needs are diverse; alternative distance learning formats will address those needs.
Purpose
. . . investigated factors affecting completion of courses in a community college by analyzing pre-existing and newly collected data on 5,004 distance learning students and 88 distance learning instructors for a seven (7) year period.
Three delivery methodologies were the focus of the study: Telecourse, live interactive TV, and Internet.
Study attempted to determine relationships between completion and variable of gender, age, ethnicity, and degree-seeking status.
Other research questions were also explored related to self-directed readiness, instructor satisfaction and student satisfaction.
Research Questions
1. Are gender, age, ethnicity, and degree-seeking status factors related to completion rates for distance-learning students taking
– telecourses,
– live interactive television courses, or
– Internet courses?
2. Are there differences in completion rates for distance-learning students who use different methodologies—
– telecourse,
– live interactive television,
– Internet?
Research Questions
3. Does the degree of self-directed learning readiness differ for distance-learning students who take
– telecourses,
– live interactive television courses, or
– internet courses?
4. Are there differences in the level of instructor involvement with distance-learning students who take
– telecourses,
– live interactive TV courses, or
– Internet courses?
Research Questions
5. How satisfied are distance-learning students with
• telecourses,
• live interactive television courses, and
• Internet courses?
6. How satisfied are instructors of distance-learning
students with
• telecourses,
• live interactive television courses, and
• Internet courses?
Methodology
Population
• 5,004 distance-learning students,
• a 10% sample of the 50,042 student enrolled in distance learning courses during the seven year period 1997-2004, and ,
• 88 distance-learning instructors of a community college.
• The distance learning students were pursuing degrees in Associate of Arts, Associate of Science, and Associate of Applied Science and certification in vocational education.
Methodology
Used pre-existing data
Used new assessments to investigate factors that
potentially impacted completion of distance
learning courses at the community college level.
Coding of participants allowed for data
collection on completion rates, instructor
involvement and student and instructor
satisfaction as it related to the different modalities
Data Analyses
Data Breakdown
Telecourse students (16.3%),
interactive television students (25%), and
Internet students (58.7%) over the various academic years.
The Internet modality began with the least number of student but showed substantial increase overall.
Sample: Represented the proportions evident in the overall population at this institution during the time period under investigation.
Newly Collected
Data
• On distance-learning instructors who had
taught at least one distance learning course
during the 1997-1998 and 2003-2004
academic years.
• On a randomly selected group of students
currently enrolled in distance learning
courses in the spring of 2004.
Instruments Used
Three (3) survey instruments designed by the college distance education and institutional technology personnel were used.
Fourth (4th) instrument was used to determine a total score for self-directed readiness (Learning Preference Assessment (LPA), a new version of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS) (Guglielmino, 1991).
The final instrument, Johnson Faculty Survey for Distance Learning Courses, was a field-tested instrument on faculty involvement in, and satisfaction with, distance learning courses was designed by the primary researcher (Johnson, 2004).
Results: Gender, Completion &
Modalities
• Significant relationships were found between
ethnicities and completions and age and
completion.
• NO significant relationship between gender and
completion in any of the analyses.
• Were more male non-completers than completers
and more female non-completers than completers
in all the modalities.
Results: Age & Completion &
Modalities
• Significant completion differences between age groups
between the telecourses and the Internet courses.
– The younger students taking the telecourse and the Internet courses tended not to complete while older age group did complete.
– Students under the age of 21 had the lowest percentage of completion in the telecourse and the Internet course.
– In general, students under the age of 31 tended not to complete Internet courses. Such difference was not noted in the interactive TV.
– However, overall analysis of age and completion reveal that as age increased, completion rates increased.
Results: Ethnicity, Completion &
Modalities • A significant relationship between ethnicity and
completion
• A significant difference between white and minority (Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Indian) students who completed telecourses and Internet courses,
• Little difference between white and minority students who completed interactive TV courses.
• For the entire group, white tend to be equally completers and non-completers, while non-whites (minorities) tended to be non-completers. Statistically significant relationship between ethnicity and completion.
– Confirms racial differences in use of technology in college, that particular study did not reveal if the differences impacted college outcomes (Flowers and Zhang, 2003)
Results: Degree-seeking, Completion
& Modalities A significant relationship between degree-seeking
status and completion for live interactive TV students and for Internet students.
AA and AS degrees tend to complete their courses (both interactive TV & Internet students)
Non-degree-seeking students do not complete theirs.
No significant relationship between degree-seeking status and completion for telecourse students.
Telecourse students seeking the AA or AS degree & non-degree seeking tend not to complete their courses;
But for the group overall, the relationship between degree-seeking status and completion is significant.
Level of student satisfaction with distance learning modalities was inconclusive.
Results: Self-Directed Learning
Readiness, Completion, Modality Individuals who chose the distance learning formats had
above-average self-directed learning readiness scores as reflected by Guglielmino’s Self Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS);
No significance difference on scores by modality. The chi-square between the different modalities was not statistically significant.
Chi-square and point-biserial tests also revealed no significant relationship between modality and course completion for SDLRS/LPA respondents.
No significant relationship between completer status and learning readiness for the sample tested.
Results: Instructor Involvement &
Modality Instructor involvement noted in the literature as having a positive
effect on student learning in the distance learning environment (Miller and Webster, 1997; Kember & Gow, 1994; Meyers and Jones, 1993).
Instrument was created for this research (Johnson Distance Learning Faculty Survey) in areas such as
communication modes,
student-teacher interaction,
student-student interaction,
synchronous and asynchronous chats, and
support services.
Results: Instructor Involvement &
Modality Significant relationships were found between
instructors mandating use of the library and modality.
Significant difference in number of teacher-student meeting sessions scheduled among the modalities and in asynchronous postings on bulletin boards.
Post hoc analysis revealed that Internet instructors used asynchronous postings more than telecourse and live-TV instructors.
Results: Satisfaction of Distance
Learning Instructors & Modality
Statistical differences by modality for instructors.
Internet instructors were more satisfied
with the Internet as a delivery mode than
telecourse instructors were satisfied with the
telecourse as a delivery mode.
Results showed no other group differences.
Little difference was noted in instructor satisfaction
with different modalities.
Conclusions
As distance learning expands in the community college level,
the students in that environment continue to change, and
the obstacles these students face continue to impact the delivery systems involved, and therefore,
is imperative that researchers continue to try and identify
the trends,
the successes and
the modifications that are needed.
This study has attempted to do that using both pre-existing and newly created data.
Recommendations
Focus on how to ensure higher completion rates using the best practices in the different modalities.
Continue to try and match what delivery systems work best for the various genders, age groups, ethnicities, and degree-seeking levels.
Focus on what encourages both the instructor and the student to select the various modes of deliveries;
Explore the relationships between distance learning courses and student achievement in relation to completion between genders, age groups, ethnic groups;
Identify what practices ensue success in all delivery systems;
Identify what barriers we can eliminate to enhance all the learning delivery modes for the instructor and the student.
References
Guglielmino, L.M. & Guglielmino, P. J. (1991). ‘The learning preference assessment (Self-directed learning readiness scale). In J. Maltby, C.A. Lewis, & A. Hill, The handbook of psychological tests. Wales, U.K.: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000.
Johnson, J.A. (2005). Investigation of factors affecting completion of distance-learning courses as a community college for a seven-year period. Unpublished dissertation, Florida Atlantic University.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58-74.
References
Meyers, C. & Jones, T.B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miller, W.W., & J.K. Webster (1997). A comparison of interaction needs and performance of distance learners in synchronous and asynchronous classes. Paper presented at the American Vocational Association Convention, Las Vegas, NV. (ERIC Document Reproduction no. 463 457)