COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFILES - New OJP Resources

DIVI8:0NOF CIRDMI1NIAL JHUlSTBCIE: SlElRVRCES

COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFILES 1982--1986

VOLUME I

NEW YORK STATE ,

JOHN J. POKLEMBA DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL .JUSTlCE . __ .... . .. SERVICES) ........ :: ......... . . .... 111.- .. - .. ~NEWYORK ::

STAn: ...

~ ... ... •

:M •••• a·····rriI .Clam •••••••••• l1li_ ..... NEW YORK STATE MARIO M. CUOMO, GOVERNOR

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES JOHN J. POKLEMBA

DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFILE: 1982·1986

Volume I

NEW YORK STATE

OFFICE 0 F JUSTICE SYSTEMS Ar~AL YSIS BARRY SAMPLE, EXECUTIVE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BUREAU OF STATISTICAL SERVICES RICHARD ROSEN, CHIEF

PREPARED BY:

SHARON LANSING PATRICK LERNER LORI DRAPER . CAROL RUSSO

FEBRUARY: 1988

1

II/ (p/3

U.S. Department of Justice Nationallnstilute of Justice

111613

This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or poliCies of the National Institute of Justice.

Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in microfiche only has been granted by

New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services

to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).

Further reprodUction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our appreciation to the many individuals in both New York State and local government agencies whose cooperation and support made this publication possible. A special thank you is extended to Gerald Luciano for graphic design? he created for the publication and to the secretarial staff in the Office of Justice Systems Analysis, in particular to Joan Burgess and Carol Novak, for their assistance in the preparation of this publication.

--------------------------------------~II

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

ORGANIZATION OF THE PROFILE

Section I Secti on II Sect i on II I Section IV Section V

Criminal Justice Agencies Demographic & Socioeconomic Characteristics Crime & Criminal Justice Activity Local Assistance Funds Correctional Facilities

NEW YORK STATE PROFILE

ILLUSTRATION

NEW YORK STATE REGIONAL MAP

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A EXPLANATORY NOTES

Analyses Section I Section II Section III Section IV Section V

Criminal Justice Agencies Demographic & Socioeconomic Characteristics Crime & Criminal Justice Activity Local Assistance Funds Correctional Facilities

APPENDIX B DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS AND CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY STATE SUMMARIES BY COUNTY FOR·

Page(s)

1

7

9 9 9

10 11

13

5

A-I

A-I A-I A-I A-2 A-2 A-2

1985 AND 1986 B-1

Selected statistics (rates and rate ranks or percent distributions) from tables in Section II Section III are presented for all 62 counties. Table numbers in this Appendix are comparable to those in which the data were presented in Section III.

APPENDIX C PERCENT OF DISPOSITIONS REPORTED BY COUNTY FOR 1984 - 1986 C-l

v

APPENDIX 0 NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES MAPS

Department of Correctional Services Division for Youth

APPENDIX E VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSES

APPENDIX F NEW YORK STATE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS

Department of Correctional Services Crime Victims Board Division of Criminal Justice Services Division of Parole Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives Division for Youth Other Criminal Justice Agencies .,

APPENDIX G CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

APPENDIX H ,ST~TEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

APPENDIX I JUVENILE OFFENDER OFFENSES

REFERENCES

vi

Page(s)

0-1

0-1 0-2

E-l

F-l

F-l F-2 F-3

F -11 F-12 F-14 F-16

G-l

H-l

I-I

R-l

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

This is the fourth annual Criminal Justice Profiles report published by the New York State Oivision" of Criminal Justice Services.

Originally conceived as an aid for criminal justice practitioners in policy formulation, this publication brings together data from a variety of sources to provide a comprehensive picture of criminal justice activities within New York State, New York City, and each of the counties in the State. These activities span the system's major processing points beginning with the number of index crimes known to the police and ending with the number of offenders under parole supervision. Juvenile Offender processing data and mor~ detailed data on alternative to incarceration programs have been incorporated into this edition. The 1986 data are compared to the 1982 data. In addition, the 1986 data are highlighted using population based rates and county rankings based on these rates for index crimes known to,the police, arrests, probation, county jail and penitentiary, state prison, and parole activity. The rates provide a" standardized measure that permits a county by county comparison of criminal justice activity by controlling for population size. Appendix B presents a State summary by county of the population rates and rate ranks along with a summary of the percent distribution for indictment, dispositiDn, conviction, and sentencing activities for bot~ 1985 and 1986.

In addition to providing statistics for all facets of the criminal justice process, each of the criminal justice profiles al~o presents relevant demographic and socioeconomic data, along with criminal justice local assistance funding and State correction and youth facilities data. The funding information presented for criminal justice local assistance programs and the budget, capacity, and staffing information presented for State correction and youth facilities provide a measure of the economic impact each have on the counties in which they are operated.

Appendix A contains notes on the analyses utilized, sources of data, units of count, offender types, and offense categories. As mentioned earlier, Appendix B presents a State summary by county of selected statistics from both the "demographic and socioeconomic characteristics" and "crime and criminal justice activity" tables in Section II and Section III, respectively. AppendiX C provides a State summary by county of the percent of dispositions reported to the Division of Criminal Justice Services. Maps showing the 'ocation of Department of Correctional Services facilities and Division fJr Youth facilities are presented in Appendix D. Appendix E contains a list of offenses counted as violent felonies. Descriptions of the local assistance programs are contained in Appendix F. Both Appendix G and Appendix H provide supplementary fiscal information for criminal justice local assistance funding in the State profile.

-3-

To facilitate the publication's use as a statistical reference for criminal justice activity within a county or region, the data have been organized by county rather than activity. Each profile uses a standardized table format for the presentation of data. As mentioned previously, the Criminal Justice Profiles publication is comprised of 13 volumes:

o Volume I contains only the New York State profile.

a V61ume II through Volume XII are regional volumes and contain the New Yor~ State profile and the profiles of counties located within the region. The New York State regional map presented on the opposite .page identifies the regions and the counties located within each of the regions.

o Volume XIII contains the New York State profile and the profiles of the six most populous non-New York City counties (Erie, Monroe, Nassau, Onondaga, Suffolk, and Westchester).

An order form for additional volumes of this publication can be found on the last page of this volume.

-4-

I t.n I

CATTARAUGUS

lAXIOHT .... 1O

ROCHESTER

REGION

NEW YORK STATE REGIONS and COUNTIES

@

NEW YORK

BROHK

IIEWYORK i CITY KIH!,S

RICIIMONOP

LOWER HUDSON .~

LONG ISLAND REGION I

--- ------------


The profile presented for New York State is organized into five sections. The contents of each section are described below.

SECTION I CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES

State Agencies

SECTION II DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Table 1 Population Demographics: 1980 Table 2 Educational Attainment of Population 25 Years

of Age or Older: 1980 Table 3 Population and Density Per Square Mile: 1982-1986 Table 4 Per Capita Income: 1982-1984 Table 5 Public High School Dropouts: 1981-82 to 1985-86 Table 6 Unemployment: 1984-1986 Table 7 Public Assistance: 1982-1986

SECTION III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY

Table 1 Index Crimes Known to the Police

Felony and Misdemeanor Arrests Table 2A Table 28 Felony and Misdemeanor Arrests: January thru

Table 2C Table 20 Table 2E

June 1987 Arrests for Selected Offenses Arrests for Possession and Sale of Drugs Felony and Misdemeanor Arrests for OWl Offenses

Table 3A Felony Indictments Table 38 Felony Indictments: January thru June 1987

Table 4A Dispositions Resulting from Felony and Misdemeanor Arrests

Table 48 Dispositions Resulting from Felony Arrests

-9-

SECTION III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY - Continued f

Table 5A Felony, Misdemeanor, and Lesser Offense Convictions Resulting from Felony and Misdemeanor Arrests

Table 58 Felony, Misdemeanor, and Lesser Offense Convictions Resulting from Felony Arrests

Table 6A Sentences as a Percent of Total Convictions Table 6B Sentences as a Percent of Felony Convictions and

Misdemeanor and Lesser Offense Convictions

Table 7A Probation Department Activity Table 78 Probation Revocations

Table 8A

Table 8B

Table 8C

Table 80

Table 8E

Table 9A Table 9B

Table 10A-1 Table 10A-2 Table lOB

Table 10C

Table llA Tab1 e lIB

Table 12

Alternatives to Incarceration: Projects

Alternatives to Incarceration: A lternat i ves Bil,. Programs -

Alternatives to Incarceration: Alternatives Bill Programs -

Alternatives to Incarceration: A1ternatfves Bill Programs -Advocacy

Alternatives to Incarceration: Alternati~es Bill Programs -Alternatives

Demonstration

Classification/ Pretrial Release

Cl as s ifi cat i on/ Community Service Classification/

Defender-Based

Classification/ Specialized

County Jail and Penitentiary Admissions County Jail and Penitentiary Capacity and

Population

Admissions to State Prison New Court Commitments to State Prison Inmates Under Custody in State Prison on

December 31 Parole Detainees in State Prison on December 31

Parole Supervision Cases Revoked and Returned Parolees

Juvenile Offender Arrests, Indictments, and Di spas it ions

-10-

SECTION IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7

Agency Funding Summary Department of Correctional Services Crime Victims Board Division of Criminal Justice Services Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives Division of Parole Division for Youth

SECTION V STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

Table lA Table IB Table lC

Facilities Capacity and Staff Summary Facilities Operating Budget Summary Facilities Capital Improvement Budget Summary

-11-

NEW YORK STATE PROFILE

SECTION I CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES NEW YORK STATE

STATE AGENCIES

Office of the Director of Criminal Justice

Room 245, Executive Chamber The State Capitol

Albany, New York 12224

Division of Criminal Justice Services Executive Park Tower

Stuyvesant Plaza Albany, New York 12203

New York State Police Building 22

State Office Building Campus Albany, New York 12226

Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives

60 South Pearl Street Albany, New York 12207

Commission of Correction 60 South Pearl Street Albany, New York 12207

Crime Victims Board 270 Broadway

New York, New York 10007

New York State Division of Parole 97 Central Avenue


Office of the Attorney General Department of Law The State Capitol


Division for Y~uth 84 Holland Avenue


Department of Correctional Services Buil di ng 2

State Office Building Campus Albany, New York 12226

Office of Court Administration Alfred E. Smith State Office Building

PO Box 7025

-15-


State Commission of Investigation 270 Broadway

New York, New York 10007

------------.----------------------------------------------------------

II DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Region

State Capital

Square Mi les

Population Percent Change 1970-1980

MID-ATLANTIC

AL8ANY

47,377

-3.7%

SOURCE: New York State Statistical Yearbook 1983-84.

Table 1

POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS FOR 1980

Number Number Rank Percent

Population 17,558,072 NA 100.0%

Density Per Square Mile 370.6 NA NA

Sex: Male 8.339.421 NA 47.5% Female 9.218,651 NA 52.5%

Race: White 13.960.868 NA 79.5% Non-White. 2.752,114 NA 15.7%

Unknown 845,090 NA 4.8%

Ethnicity: Hispanic 1. 659 ,300 NA 9.5%

Age: 9 and Under 2.320.804 NA 13.2% 10 to 15 1. 721,835 NA 9.8% 16 to 18 960,207 NA 5.5% 19 to 24 1.842,534 NA 10.5%

25 and Over 10,712,692 NA 61.0%

SOURCE: US Bureau of Census.

Table 2

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF 1980 POPULATION 25 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER

Number Percent

Population Age 25 and Over 10,712,692 100.0%

8th Grade or Less 1,962,158 18.3%

High Schoo 1: to 3 years 1. 653 ,751 15.4% 4 years 3.651. 739 34.1%

Co llege: to 3 years 1.529.817 14.3% 4 years or more 1. 923.547 18.0%

SOURCE: US Bureau of Census. -17-

NEW YORK STATE

Percent Rank

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

tlA

NA NA NA NA NA

Percent Rank

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

II DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS NEW YORK STATE

Table 3 POPULATION 1982-1986

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Population 17.567.000 17.667.DOO 17.735.000 17,782.754 17.772.100

Density Per Square Mi le 370.8 372.9 374.3 375.3 375.1

SOURCE: NYS Department of Commerce and the US Bureau of Census.

Table 4 PER CAPITA INCOME: 1982-1984

Per Capita Income

~

12.228

~

13.063

~

14,341

NOTE: Data for 1985 and 1986 were not yet available. SOURCE: NYS Department of Commerce. .

Table 5 PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS: 1981-82 TO 1985-86

Public High School Students Who Dropped Out of School Number

Percent

SOURCE: NYS Department of Education.

Monthly Average Unemployed of Civilian Labor Force

Schoo 1 Year.

65.229 6.7%

60.311 6.5%

Table 6 UNEMPLOYMENT: 1984-1986

Number Percent

583.455 7.2%

60.834 6.9%

543.805 6.5%

55.880 6.5%

526.363 6.3%

Income Rank I9.§!..

NA

49.391 5.B%

Percent Rank ~

NA

NOTE: Data are based on 1985 benchmarks; 1982 and 1983 data based on the 1985 benchmarks were not available.

SOURCE: HYS Department of Labor.

Table 7 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE: 1982-1986

~onthly Average Population ~ecelving Public Assistance Number 1.285,535 1,343,428 1.381,514 1,383,399 1,363.126

RanK 1986

NA

NA

Percent Rank ~

NA

Percent Rank 1986

Percent 7.3% 7.6% 7.8% 7.8% 7 7~' ~A

SOURCE: HYS Department of Social Services.

-18-

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY

~ .-..!m..

INDEX CRIME 1.129,324 1,029,391

VIOLENT 174,138 161,216

MURDER 2,011 1.951

FORCIBLE RAPE 5,132 5,2BO

ROBBERY 107,514 94.733

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 59,481 59,252

PROPERTY 955,186 868,175

BURGLARY 291,747 247,927

LARCENY 526,480 500,513

MV THEFT 136,959 119,735

Table 1

INDEX CRIMES KNOWN TO THE POLICE

Number of Crimes

~ ---1ill-

985,908 989,405

162,000 165,043

1,777 1,688

5,571 5,674

89,917 89,603

64,735 68,078

823,908 824,362

222,644 218,844

485,881· 499,237

115,383 106,281

~

1. 020, 401

174,860

1,909

5,403

91.376

76,172

845,541

216,157

516,492

112,892

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services, Uniform Crime Reporting System.

-19-

NE\I YORK STATE

1986 Crimes Per 100,000 % Change Pooulation 82 vs 86

5,741.6 -9.6%

983.9 0.4%

10.7 -5.1%

30.4 5.3%

514.2 -15.0%

428.6 28.1%

4,757.7 -11. 5%

1,216.3 -25.9%

2,906.2 -1.9%

635.2 -17.6%

III CRIME ~ CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY

~

ARRESTS 374,301

FELONY 141,679

VIOLENT 58,946

OTHER 82,733

MISDEMEANOR 232,622

Table 2A

FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS (Adults Only)

Number of Arrests

..JML ~ ~ ~ 383,075 403,785 421,631 456,087

141,301 149,343 151,279 172,153

58,215 61,158 60,158 65,735

83,086 88,185 91,121 106,418

241,774 254,442 270,352 283,934

1986 Arrests Per 100,000 Pogulation

2,566.3

968.7

369.9

598.8

1.597.6

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services, Arrests and Processing Trends Fi leo

~re 1 imlnary data.

TABLE 2B

FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS: JANUARY THRU JUNE 1987 (Adults Only)

% Change

Numberl Jan-June 86 vs 87

ARRESTS 233,061 4.3%

FELONy2 86,268 2.3%

VIOLENT 31. 282 -1.3%

OTHER 54,986 4.4%

MISDEMEANOR 146,793 5.5%

NEW YORK STATE

% Change 82 vs 86

21.9%

2!. 5;~

11.:%

28.6%

22.1%

2 [~creases ~r decreases 1n the number of felonies and misdemeanors between these two periods ref~ec: lr par: ~~arges 1n 3ectl0n 155 or the Penal Law wh1ch became effectlve on 1/1/87; some larceny offenses :rat ~ere ~'assjfled as felon1es prlor to this date are now classifled as misdemeanors.

SOURCE: 9,vlslon of Crimlnal Justice Services. Arrests and Processing Trends F1le.

-20-

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTIG,..E..,:.A".,C"-T'-'YV:..:;I..;..TY"--_____________________ .;.:.;NE"-''rI:......;,.;YO::.:.R:.:.,:K,-,S:::..;T",A"-,,,-TE

-..lML

MURDER 1,608

FORCIBLE RAPE 1.957

ROBBERY 20,046

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 19,554

BURGLARY 24,476

LARCENy2 67,502

Table 2C

ARRESTS FOR SELECTED OFFENSES 1 (Adults Only)

Number of Arrests

~ ~ ~

1,560 1,367 1.331

1.977 2,116 2,155

19,597 20,231 19,713

19,802 22,241 22,945

22,418 20,687 19,471

66,891 65,814 68,220

1986 Arrests Per 100,000 % Change

~ POQulation 82 vs 86

1,420 8.0 -11.7%

2,140 12.0 9.4%

22,706 127.8 13.3%

24,830 139.7 27.0%

20,540 115.6 -16.1%

75,476 424.7 11.8%

1 NYS Penal Law codes for the most serious felony and misdemeanor charge in an arrest event have been organized by UCR' Index crime categories to allow more meaningful comparisons with the UCR Index crime data presented in Table 1 of Section III. The unit of count for arrest data, the arrest-event, differs from' tho~e used for Index crimes (see Appendix A). Also, these arrest data reflect only adult arrests (i.e., persons age 16 years of age or older at time of arrest); while crimes committed by persons under age 16 are included in Table 1. Finally, these arrest data do not necessarily reflect clearances of the reported crimes shown in Table 1.

2 Arrests for the Index crime of "motor vehicle theft" are reported as "larceny" because it is not possible to extract motor vehicle larcenies from the Arrest and Processing Trends File.

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services, Arrests and Processing Trends File.

-21-

--------------------------------------------------------~,.~~-----


~

DRUG ARRESTS 48.226

CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE (PL 220) 34.373

POSSESSION 18.110

SALE 9.433

OTHER 6.830

MARIHUANA (PL 221) 13.853

POSSESSION 7.053

SALE 6.800

Table 20

ARRESTS FOR DRUG OFFENSES1 (Adults Only)

Number of Arrests

~ ~ ~

53.768 66.982 74.199

38.441 48.097 52.662

23.827 30.556 34.394

10.544 12.684 13.691

4.070 4.857 4.577

15.327 18.885 21,537

7.252 8.881 10.747

8.075 10.004 10,790

NEW YORK STATE

1986 Arrests Per 100.000 % Change

~ POQulation 82 vs 86

91.624 515.5 90.0%

74.938 421. 7 118.0%

49.535 278.7 173.5%

20.174 113.5 113.9%

5.229 29.4 -23.4%

16.686 93.9 20.5%

8.596 48.4 21.9%

8.090 45.5 19.0%

Felony and misdemeanor arrests that include at least one drug charge (Penal Law of New York State -Sections 220 and 221).

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services. Drug Arrests and Processing Trends File.

~

OWl ARRESTS (VTL 1192) 55.566

FELONY 3.184

MISDEMEANOR 52.382

Table 2E

FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS FOR OWl OFFENSES 1 (Adults Only)

Number of Arrests

~ ~ ~ ~

60.887 64.261 62.870 59.387

3.748 3.032 3.065 3.536

57.139 61.229 59.805 55.851

1986 Arrests Per 1.000 Licensed Drivers

6.0

0.4

5.6

% Change 82 vs 86

6.9%

11.1%

6.6%

Felony and misdemeanor arrests that include at least one charge for a OWl offense (Vehicle and Traffic Law: State of New York - Section 1192).

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services. OWl Arrests and Processing Trends File.

-22-


Table 3A

FELONY INOICTMENTS1 (Adults and Juvenile Offenders)

Number and Percent of Felon~ Indictments

~ ~ ~ ~

FELONY INDICTMENTS 46,674 46,147 47,961 50,016 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

VIOLENT 24,537 22,711 22,820 22,000 52.6% 49.2% 47.6% 44.0%

OTHER 22,137 23,436 25,141 28,016 47.4% 50.8% 52.4% 56.0%

~

55,810 100.0%

21. 833 39.1%

33,977 60.9%

NEW YORK STATE

% Change 82 vs 86

19.6%

-11. 0%

53.5%

Felony indictments reported for New York State include those prosecuted by the district attorney in each of the State's 62 counties, the New York City Special Prosecutor, the Special Narcotics Prosecutor. the Nursing Homes Special Prosecutor, and the Organized Crime Task Force Special Prosecutor.

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services, Indictment Statistical System ..

Table 36

FELONY INDICTMENTS 1: JANUARY THRU JUNE 19872

(Adults and Juvenile Offenders)

% Change Jan-June

Number 86 vs 87

FELONY INDICTMENTS 31.062 17.4%

VIOLENT 10,937 1.1%

OTHER 20,125 28.7%

Felony indictments reported for New York State include those prosecuted by the district attorney in each of the State's 62 counties, the New York City Special Prosecutor, the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, the Nursing Homes Special Prosecutor, and the Organized Crime Task Force Special Prosecutor.

2 Preliminary data.

SOURCE: Divlsion of Criminal Justice Services. Indictment Statistical System.

-23-

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NEW YORK STATE

Table 4A

DISPOSITIONS RESULTING FROM FELONY ANO MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS1 (Adults Only)

Number and Percent of Dispositions Resu1ting from

Felon~ and Misdemeanor Arrests

~2 }'~ Change

~ ~ ~ 1985 82 vs 86

DISPOSITIONS 307,486 336.313 337,261 363,264 371,229 20.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

CONVICTIONS 208,720 233,893 234,263 251,609 248,728 19. 2~~ 67.9% 69.5% 69.5% 69.3% 67.0%

ACQUITTALS 1.831 2,119 2,172 2.261 2.257 23.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

DISMISSALS 87.013 89.771 91.177 99.038 110.615 27.1% 28.3% 26.7% 27.0% 27.3% 29.8%

NOT PROSECUTEO 7.612 7,169 6,630 7,220 6.602 -13.3;: 2.5% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8%

OTHER 2.310 3,361 3.019 3,136 3,027 31,0% 0.8% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8%

Disposition data are based' on the year of sentencing for convictions and on the year of d sposition for acquittals, dismissals, not prosecuted, and "other" dispo~itions. Because of underreport ng of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C), these data are most appropriately used as indicators of trends n system activity rather than measures of total system workload.

2 Preliminary data.


-24-


Table 48

DISPOSITIONS RESULTING FROM FELONY ARRESTS! (Adults Only)

Number and Percent of Dispositions Resulting from Felon~ Arrests

~2 % Change

--lliL ~ --ill!. ~ 82 vs 86

DISPOSITIONS 118,988 127.576 126.882 134.164 142.148 19.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

CONVICTIONS 77.746 86.370 84.585 89.207 90.738 16.7% 65.3% 67.7% 66.7% 66.5% 63.8%

ACQUITTALS 1.304 1.469 1.527 1.558 1.555 19.2% 1.1% 1. 2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.1%

DISMISSALS 35.279 34.826 35,673 38.400 44,469 26.0% 29.6% 27.3% 28.1% 28.6% 31.3%

NOT PROSECUTED 3.961 4.064 4.303 3.967 3.977 0.2% 3.3% 3.2% 3.4% 3.0% 2.8%

OTHER 698 847 794 1.032 1.409 101.9% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 1. 0%

Disposition data are based on the year of sentencing for convictions and on the year of disposition for acquittals. dismissals. not Rrosecuted. and "other" dispositions. Because of the underreporting of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C). -these data are nost appropriately used as indicators of trends in system activity rather than measures of total system workload.

2 Preliminary data.

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services. Arrests and Processlng Trends File.

-25-

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NE~ YORK STATE

Table 5A

FELONY, MISDEMEANOR, AND LESSER OFFENSE CONVICTIONS 1 RESULTING FROM FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS

(Adults Only)

Number and Percent of Convictions Resulting from

Felon~ and Misdemeanor Arrests

~2 % Change

_1982 ~ ~ -ill.§... 82 vs 86

CONVICTIONS 208,720 233,893 234,263 251. 609 248,728 19.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

FELONY 26,558 32,121 31.197 33,669 37,108 39.7% 12.7% 13.7% 13.3% 13.4% 14.9%

VIOLENT 11,719 14,667 13,671 13,264 13,671 16.7% 5.6% 6.3% 5.8% 5.3% 5.5%

OTHER 14,839 17,454 17,526 20,405 23,437 57.9% 7.1% 7.5% 7.5% 8.1% 9.4%

MISDEMEANOR 103,560 112,772 113,538 121,797 118,.736 1~. 7% 49.6% 48.2% 48.5% 48.4% 47.7%

LESSER OFFENSES 78,602 89,000 89,.528 96,143 92,884 18.2% 37.7% 38.1% 38.2% 38.2% 37.3%

Disposition data are based on the year of sentencing for convictions. Because of the underreporting of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C), these data are most appropriately used as indicators of trends in system activity rather than measures of total system workload.

2 Preliminary data.


-26-


Table 5B

FELONY. MISDEMEANOR. AND LESSER OFFENSE CONVICTIONS! RESULTING FROM FELONY ARRESTS

(Adults Only)

Number and Percent of Convictions Resulting from Fe10n~ Arrests

~2 % Change

~ ~ ~ ~ 82 vs 86

CONVICTIONS 77.746 86.370 84.585 89.207 90.738 16.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

FELONY 25.657 31.113 30.191 32.289 35.690 39.1% 33.0% 36.0% 35.7% 36.2% 39.3%

VIOLENT 11.719 14.667 13.671 13.264 13.671 16.7% 15.1% 17.0% 16.2% 14,9% 15.1%

OTHER 13.938 16.446 16.520 19.025 22.019 58.0% 17.9% 19.0% 19.5% 21.3% 24.3%

MISDEMEANOR 38.110 39.913 38.450 39.976 39.198 2.9% 49.0% 46.2% 45.5% 44.8% 43.2%

LESSER OFFENSES 13.979. 15.344 15.944 J.6.942 15,850 13.4% 18.0% 17.8% 18.8% 19.0% 17.5%

Disposition data are based on the year of sentencing for convictions. Because of underreporting of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C). these data are most appropriately used as indicators of trends in system activity rather than measures of total system workload.

2 Preliminary data.

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services. Arrests and Processing Trends File.

-27-


Table 6A

SENTENCES AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL CONVICTIONS l

(Adults Only)

Sentences as a Percent of Total Convict,ions

~ --1ML ~ ~ ~2

CONVICTIONS 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

STATE PRISON 5.5 6.1 5.8 5.6 6.5

LOCAL JAIL 26.6 26.8 29.4 31.4 33.1

LOCAL JAIL AND PROBATION 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.5

PROBATION 10.7 10.2 9.9 9.8 9.5

FINES 32.5 33.0 33.0 31.3 28.6

OTHER 22.2 21.1 19.0 18.8 18.8

1 These data reflect the most serious sentence in multiple sentence dispositions (e.g., sentences including a jail term and a Jine have been counted as "local jail"). Becaase of underrepo,ting of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C), these data are most appropriately used as indicators of trends in system activity rather than measures of total system workload. Workload measures can be found in Tables 7A for probation activity, in Tables 9A and 9B for local jail act'ivity, and in Table IDA for state prison activity.

2 Preliminary data.


-28-

III CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NEW YORK STATE

Tabl.e 6B

SENTENCES AS A PERCENT OF FELONY CONVICTIONS AND MISDEMEANOR AND LESSER OFFENSE CDNVICTIONS1

(Adult Only)

Sentences as a Percent of Convictions

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Misd & Misd & Misd & Misd & Misd &

f.!li2.n..::L Le s se r ~~ Felony Lesser Felony Lesser Felony ~

CONVICTIONS 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

STATE PRISON 43.2 NA 44.1 NA 43.7 NA 41.8 NA 43.4 NA

LOCAL JAIL 16.5 28.0 14.3 2~.8 13.6 31.8 13.9 34.0 13.3 36.6

LOCAL JAIL AND PROBATION 10.6 1.3 13.0 1.2 14.1 1.2 15.6 1.2 17.2 1.1

PROIMTION 27.7 8.2 26.2 7.7 26.5 7.4 26.6 7.2 24.4 6.9

FINES 0.8 37.1 1.2 38.0 1.1 37.9 0.9 36.0 0.8 33.5

OTHER 1.2 25.3 1.2 24.2 1.1 21. 7 1.1 21.5 1.0 21.9

These data reflect the most serious sentence in multiple sentence dispositions (e.g., sentences including a jail term and a fine have been counted as "local jail"). Because of underreporting of dispositions to DCJS (see Appendix C), these data are most appropriately used as indicators of trends in system activity rather than measures of total system workload. Workload measures can be found in Table 7A for probation activity, in Table 9A for local jail activity, and Table lOA for state prison activity.

2 Preliminary data.


-29-

2

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSiICE ACiIVITY NEW YORK STAiE

iable 7A

PROBATION DEPARTMENi ACTIVITY

Number of Cases 19B6 Cases Per 100.000 % Change

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pooulation 82 vs 86

INiAKE OPENED1 151. 698 142,401 150.221 149.574 138.427 778.9 -8.7%

INVESnGATI0NS RECEIVED 133,437 145.536 147.948 153.536 156.142 878.6 17.0%

FAMILY COURT' 25.266 25.516 25,297 27,818 27.555 155.0 9.1%

CRIMINAL COURT 10e.17l 120.020 122.651 125.718 128.587 723.5 18.9%

PRE-DISPOSITION SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED 15,340 15,155 15.154 16.883 17.956 101.0 17.1%

FAMILY COURT 9.237 9,372 8,272 8,513 8,849 49.8 -4.2%

CRIMINAL COURT 6.103 5.783 6.882 8.370 9.107 51.2 49.2%

PROBAnON SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED 40.293 45.020 44,479 46,572 48,072 270.5 19.3%

FAMILY COURT 6,830 6,608 6,219 6.630 6.904 38.8 1.1%

CRIMINAL COURT 33.463 38.412 38,260 39.942 41.168 231.6 23.0%

UNDER PROBATI0N2 SUPERVISION 112.858 124.048 133.821 143,609 156,149 878.6 38.4%

FAMILY COURT 13.601 13.584 13.313 13.351 14.063 79.1 3.4%

CRIMINAL COURT 99.257 110.464 120.508 130.258 142.086 799.5 43.1%

UNDER PROBATION SUPERVISION ON DECEMBER 31 '79.101 89.390 97.441 108.116 114,766 645.8 45.1%

FAMILY COURT 7.049 7.142 7.125 7.198 7.209 40.6 2.3%

CRIMINAL COURT 72.052 82.248 90.316 100,918 107,557 605.2 49.3%

1 Intake occurs only in fami ly court.

2 The total number of probation cases supervised during a given year; i.e .. probation cases carried over from the previous year (cases under supervision on December 31) plus those received during the year.

SOURCE: NYS Divlsion of Probatlon and Correctional Alternatives.

-30-


TABLE 7B

PROBATION REVOCATIONS

Number of Revocations

-illL ~ -.ill!.. ~

REVOCATIONS 5,009 5,409 6,266 6,826

FAMILY COURT 610 657 661 754

CRIMINAL COURT 4,399 4,752 5,605 6,072

TECHNICAL 2,053 2,153 2,740 3,166

NEW CONVICTION 2,346 2,599 2,865 2,906

SOURCE: NYS Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives.

-31-

NEW YORK STATE

1986 Revocations Per 1,000 % Change

~ Probationers 82 vs 86

7,814 50.0 56.0%

787 56.0 29.0%

7,027 49.5 59.7%

3,502 24.6 70.6%

3,525 24.8 50.3%

!II CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NE\.I YORK STATE

Table 8A

ALTERNATIVE TO INCARCERATION PROGRAMS: DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

FY 1983-84 FY 1984-85

3.110

FY 1985-86

16.227

FY 1986-87

CLIENTS SERVED 2.541 17.532


ALTERNATIVE TO INCARCERATION PROGRAMS: CLASSIFICATION/ALTERNATIVES BILL

Table 8B

PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM: 1986

CASES SCREENED

CASES INTERVIE\.IED

RELEASED1

34,695

20.500

7.933

NA

100.0%

38.7%

1 Program intervention contributed to or was directly responsible for the release of these detained defendants.

Table 80

DEFENDER-BASED ADVOCACY PROGRAM: 1986

Number Percent

CLI ENTS SERVED 709 NA

CLIENTS SERVED BY TYPE OF SERVICE PROVIDED:

INFORMATION AND REFERRAL 467 NA

REPORTS PREPARED FOR COURT 269 100.0%

REPORTS ACCEPTED 228 84.8%

Table 8C

COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM: 1986

CASES SENTENCED

CASES DISCHARGED

SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME

Table 8E

1,338

881

662

SPECIALIZED ALTERNATIV~S: 1986

CLIENTS SERVED

RECOMMENDATIONS TO COURT

ACCEPTED

526

537

367


-32-

NA

lOO.Of,

75.1%

NA

100.0%

68.3%


Table 9A

COUNTY JAIL AND PENITENTIARY ADMISSIONS

Number of Admissions

~ ~ ---.illL ~ ~

ADMISSIONS * 190,388 196,447 210,186 234,452

UNSENTENCED * 141,411 147,974 159,474 183,416

SENTENCED * 48,977 48.473 50.712 51.036

" New York City Department of Correction data were not available.

Source: NYS Commission of Correction.

Table 98

COUNTY JAIL AND PENITENTIARY CAPACITY AND POPULATION

~ ~ ---.illL ~ ~

REPORTED CAPACITY 17.225 17.730 19.011 19.635 21.448

AVERAGE DAllY POPULATION 15.966 16.792 17.534 18,736 21.134

DECEM8ER 31 POPULATION 16.430 15.545 17.008 18.722 21.121

UNSENTENCED 11.311 10.049 11.656 12.956 15.056

SENTENCED 5.119 5.496 5.352 5.766 6.065

* New York City Department of Correction data were not available.

SOURCE: NYS Commission of Correction.

-33-

NEW YORK STATE

1986 Admissions Per 100,000 % Change POQulation 82 vs 86

1.319.2 NA

1,032.0 NA

287.2 NA

1986 Inmates Per 100.000 % Change Pooulation 82 vs 86

120.7 24.5%

118.9 32.4%

118.8 28.6%

84.7 33.1%

34.1 18.5%

III CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVrTY

TABLE 10A-l

ADMISSIONS TO STATE PRISON

Number of Admissions

--ill.L ~ .JML ~

ADMISSIONS 12.727 14.867 14.848 15.570

NE'" COURT 10.406 12.537 12.248 12.420 COMMITMENTS

TRANSFERS FROM 437 493 549 749 OUTS I DE DEPT.

AFFIRMATIONS OF SENTENCE 62 52 48 39

PAROLE VIOLATORS 1.229 1.223 1.497 1.907

CONDITIONAL RELEASE VIOLATORS 445 430 -356 244

RETURNS FROM ESCAPE/ABSCOND 140 128 145 173

OTHER ADMISSIONS 8 4 5 38

1 Preliminary data.

SOURCE: /lYS Department of Correctional Services.

-34-

NEW YORK STATE

1986 Adm. Rate

~1 Per 100.000 % Change Population 82 vs 86

19.090 107.4 50.0%

14.934 84.0 43.5%

742 4.2 69 .a}~

50 .3 -19.4%

2.808 15.8 128.5%

365 2.1 -18.0%

158 .9 12.9%

33 .2 312.5%

III CRIME & CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NE'li YORK STATE

Table 10A-2

NEW COURT COMMITMENTS TO STATE PRISON l

1986 Number of New Court

New Court Commitments Committments

~2 Per 100,000 % Change

~ ~ --lll.§L 1985 POQulation 82 vs 86

NEW COURT COMMITMENTS 10,406 12,537 12;248 12,420 14,934 84.0 43.5%

VIOLENT FELONIES3 6,622 7,933 7.334 6,994 7,759 43.7 17.2%

HOMICIDE 899 871 908 874 938 5.3 4.3%

SEX OFFENSE 372 414 469 520 581 3.3 56. 2~~

ROBBERY 3,37B 4.055 3.459 3.063 3.574 20.1 5.8%

BURGLARY 951 1.416 1.341 1,286 1.444 8.1 51.8%

IIEAPONS 587 718 633 677 649 3.7 10.6%

OTHER 435 459 524 . 574 573 3.2 31.7%

DRUG FELONIES 4 1. 235 1.623 1.877 2.218 3.228 18.2 161. 4%

POSSESSION 317 357 476 600 886 5.0 179.5%

SALE 918 1.266 1.401 1.618 2,342 13.2 155.1%

OTHER FELONIES 2,284 2,701 2.797 2,932 3.653 20.6 59.9%

YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS 265 280 240 276 294 1.7 10.9%

The files from which these data are extr~cted are continuously updated. As a result, the counts presented in this table may differ slightly from those presented in other reports.

2 Preliminary data.

3 New court commitments in which the top conviction offense is a violent felony. Appendix E contains a list of the offenses counted as violent felonies.

4 New court commitments in which the top conviction offense is for the possession or sale of drugs (PL 220 ana PL 221). Drug felonies for the injection of a narcotic (PL 220.46). use of drug paraphernalia (PL 220.55), or possession of precursors (PL 220.60) are reported as "other felonies."

SOURCE: NYS Department of Correctional Services.

-35-


Table lOB

INMATES UNDER CUSTODY IN STATE PRISON ON DECEMBER 31

Inmates Number of Inmates Under Custody Under Cust. in State Prison on December 31 on 12/31/86

Per 100.000 % Change --illL ~ ~ ~ ~ Pooulation 82 vs 86

UNDER CUSTODY 28.203 30.543 33.276 34.737 38.502 216.6 36.5%

VIOLENT FELONIES1 19.894 22.100 23.730 24.329 26,024 146.4 30.8%

HOMICIDE 4.817 5.231 5.634 5.933 6.597 37.1 37.0%

SEX OFFENSE 1.640 1.733 1.896 2.036 2.278 12.8 38.9%

ROBBERY 9.307 10.060 10.444 10.170 10.666 60.0 14.6%

BURGLARY 1.674 2,462 2.961 3.188 3.476 19.6 107.6%

WEAPONS 1.224 1.357 1.434 1.513 1.450 8.2 18.5%

OTHER 1.232 1.257 1.361 1.489 1.557 8.8 26.4%

DRUG FELONIES2 2:647 - 3.1.69 3,926 4.643 6.008 33.8 127.0%

POSSESSION 665 771 968 1.201 1. 597 9.0 140.2X,

SALE 1,982 . 2.398 2.958 3.442 4.411 24.8 122.6%

OTHER FELONIES 5.191 4.890 5.261 5,408 6.095 34.3 17.4%

YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS 471 384 359 357 375 2.1 -20.4%

Inmates under custody whose top conviction offense is a violent felony. Appendix E contains a 1 ist of the offenses counted as violent felonies.

2 Inmates under custody who~e top conviction offense is for the possession or sale of drugs (PL 220 and and PL 221). Drug felonies for the injection of a narcotic (PL 220.46), use of drug paraphernalia (PL 220.55). or possession of precursors (PL 220.60) are reported as "other felonies."


TABLE 10C

PAROLE DETAINEES IN STATE PRISON ON DECEMBER 31 1

PAROLE DETAINEES

,

~

556 414

~

673

~

634

" Parolees awaiting parole revocation hearings are detalned in the State Prison. Parole detainees are not counted as part of the admlssions or under custody P9pulations.

SOURCE: MYS Department of Correctional Services.

-36-

198


Table llA

PAROLE SUPERVISION CASES

1986 Number of Parolees Parolees

Per 100,000 % Change ~ ~ .....1mi!.. ~ ~ Poculation 82 vs 86

RELEASES TO PAROLE 9,283 11 ,312 10,911 12,068 12,942 72.8 39.4%

UNDER PAROLE 1 SUPERVISION 25,616 29,223 31. 888 34,766 37,359 210.2 45.8%

UNDER PAROLE SUPERVISION ON DECEMBER 31 17,911 20,977 22,698 24,417 26,176 147.3 46.1%

The total number of parolees under supervision during a given year; i.e., parolees carried over from the previous year (cases under supervision on December 31) plus inmates released during the year to the Division of Parole for supervision .

. SOURCE: NYS Division of Parole.

Table 11B

PAROLE REVOCATIONS AND RETURNS

1986 Number of Parolees Revocations

Per 1,000 % Change ~ ~ .....1mi!.. ~ ~ Parolees 82 vs 86

REVOKED AND RETURNED 1 2,573 2,603 3,141 4,038 4,519 121.0 75.6%

RULE VIOLATIONS 865 826 907 1,186 1,403 37.6 62. 2~~

NEW ARRESTS 1,261 1. 149 1,260 1.435 1,571 42.1 24.6%

NEW FELONY CONVICTIONS 447 628 974 1.417 1,545 41.4 245.5%

The total number of parolees revoked and returned during a given year.

SOURCE: NYS Division of Parole.

-37-

II! CRIME & C~IMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY NEW YORK STATE

Table 12

JUVENILE OFFENDERS ARRESTS. INDICTMENTS. AND OISPOSITIONS1

Number of Cases % Change

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 82 vs 86

FELONY ARRESTS 1.441 1.248 1.275 1.257 1.200 -16.7%

FELONY INDICTMENTS 664 496 447 505 429 -35.4%

DISPOSITIONS 1.419 1.213 1.105 1.019 1.021 -28.0%

CONVICTIONS 517 515 388 369 410 -20. 7~~

STATE FACILITY 257 251 158 147 142 -44.7%

LOCAL JAIL 34 40 24 40 33 -2.9%

LOCAL JAIL ANO PROBATION 28 32 39 40 55 96.4%

PROBATION 183 166 133 124 171 -6.6%

OTHER 15 26 34 18 9 -40.0%

ACQUITTALS 7 5 7 10 10 42.9%

DISMISSALS 269 202 189 225 263 -2.2%

NOT PROSECUTED 139 70 73 54 60 -56.8%

REMOVED TO FAMILY COURT 443 413 430 342 257 -42.0%

OTHER 44 8 18 19 21 -52.3%

1 A Juvenile Offender is a person 14 or 15 years of age who is criminally respons ble for a specified felony act(s) (see Appendix I); and a person 13 years of age who is criminally respons ble for an act which constitutes second degree murder as defined in subdivisions one and two of sect on 125.25 of the New York State Penal Law. Criminal courts have original jurisdiction over juvenile offenders who are prosecuted as adults. A criminal court can waive original jurisdiction and remove a "juvenile offender" to family court where that person is reclassified as a "juvenile delinquent."

SOURCE: Division of Criminal Justice Services: Juvenile Offender Trends File and the Indictment Statistical System.

-38-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS NE\I YORK STATE

Table 1

LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING SUMMARY 1

(Thousands of Dollars)

Exgenditures Aggrooriations % Change

Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs ~ FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Dept. of Correctional Services 11,326.8 13,306.7 15,542.3 24,943.8 120.2% 30,052.0 38,678.0

Crime Victims Board 8,388.2 10.881.1 10,209.9 10,381.9 23.8% 13,999.1 18.486.4

~ivision' of Criminal Justice Services 60.722.3 72,9DO.4 87,oll6.1 88,130.9 45.1% 99.016.1 109.107.3

Division of Parole 529.4 706.0 993.0 1. 229.2 132.2% 2,887.1 2,518.5

Division of Probation2

and Correctional Alternatives 32.851.1 36.559.0 41.385.3 50.395.3 53.4% 59.238.8 66.557.8

Division for Youth3 77.121.9 80.109.9 86.908.0 184.219.1 138.9% 116.329.8 119.839.3

Other Local Aid

District 4 Attorney Salaries 370.0 397.5 442.5 698.8 88.9% 870.2 896.0

STOP Program - DrugS Residence Project NA 525.r.

TOTAL 191.309.8 214,860.7 243.177.1 359.999.1 88.2% 322,918.1 356.608.3

This summary includes local assistance funds that are not reported in "county" profiles because the funds were awarded to agencies (e.g .• the State Police or the Public Defenders Association) that do not provide cO\lnty-specific services. Please see Appendix G for local assistance funds awarded to agencies in New York City that provide services citywide and Appendix H for local assistance funds awarded to agencies that prlJv ide serv ices sta tew i de.

2 On April 1. 1985. the Alternatives to Incarceration Program was transferred from the Division of Criminal Justice Services and combined with the Division of Probation to form the Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives. The Alternative to Incarceration Program expenditures from FY 1982-83 through 1984-85 are included with the expenditures reported for this newly formed agency.

3 The FY 1985-86 DFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a result of Governor Cuomo's recommendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also e 1 imin'ate arrearages.

4 The Office of the State Comptroller administers this program.

5 The responsibility for the administration of this program w~s transferred from the Division of Parole to the Division of Substance Abuse Services in FY 1987-88. Funds for this program were first appropriated in FY 1986-87; these funds were reappropriated for FY 1987-88.

-39-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNOS

3~ard of Prisoners i

Coram Nobis

Felons

Parole Violators

State Readies2

Community 3 ireatment Programs

Prisoner Transfer1

TOTAL

FY 82-83

4.9

10.187.9

646.4

487.7

11.326.8

Table 2

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


FY 83-84

6.6

11,956.9

731.3

311.8

300.1

13,306.7

Exoenditures

FY 84-85

34.9

12.709.5

1,648.7

873.3

275.8

15.542.3

FY 85-86

32.7

18.574.6

3.697.5

2.322.3

316.8

24.943.8

% Change 82 vs 85

572.0%

82.3%

472.0%

IlA

NA

-35.0%

120.2%

NEil YORK STATE

Aoprooriations

FY 86-87 FY 87-88

51. 5 55.5

22.770.1 25.555.4

2.936.4 6.515.3

3,528.0 5.55i.3

400.0 400.0

366.0 400.0

30,052.0 38.678.0

1 local correctional facilities are reimbursed for expenditures from the "statewide" lump-sum appropriation for this program.

2 This program component was implemented in FY 1985-86.

3 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84 and is funded through the State Operations Budget. No funds were appropriated for this program in FY 1985-86.


-40-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS NE\I YORK STATE

Table :3

CRIME VICTIMS BOARD LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exgenditures Agorogriations % Change

Program FY B2-B3 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85' FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Crime Victim Compensation Awards 6,468.8 8,807.5 7,038.5 8,002.6 23.7% 8,009.0 12,697.0

Victim and Witness Assistance Program

Comprehensive 864.5 846.2 1. 401.9 1,272 .1 47.1% 3,622.1 3,443.8

Court Related 407.8 406.6 119.9 520.0 27.5% 626.1 767.1

Domestic Violence 178.7 265.7 325.6 223.3 24.9% 561.7 547.0

Elderly 377 .1 386.8 476.6 337.2 -10.6% 567.2 681.1

Sexua 1 Assau 1t 91.2 168.3 247.4 26.7 -70.7% 613.0 350.5

TOTAL 8,388.2 10,881.1 10,209.9 10,381.9 23.8% 13,999.1 18,486.4

SOURCE: NYS Crime Victims Board.

-41-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS NEW YORK STATE

Table 4

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


EXIlenditures AOIlroIlriations % Change

Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Asset/Forfeiture1

Initiative 593.9 236.5 NA

Crime Prevention2 and Protection 1. 420. 5 1.585.7 1.351.0 NA 2.637.1 3.042.5

Emergency Felony Case Processing Program 3.285.2 3.682.3 3,939.1 4,067.4 23.8% 4.150.2 4,150.2

Indigent 3 Parolee Program 1.259.5 1.358.9 1.507.0 1,593.1 26.5% 1,625.8 1,697.4

Justice 4 Assistance Act NA 3,379.7

Juvenile JusticeS and Delinquency P'revention 2,849.4 2,765.1 2.651.8 1.579.5 -44.6% 2.673.9 2.821.0

Law Guardian 6 NA 100.0 Backup Center· --

Major Offense 12:189.8 Po 1 ice Program 10,057.8 10,661.5 11,407.8 11,247.6 11.8% 11,499.8

Mobi Ie R,,'dio District Program2 1.904.3 3,600.6 3,368.3 NA 4.288.3 1. 270.0

Narcotics Control l NA 11,539.0

Nassau County Rape 6

Victim Services NA 30.0 . 8

Neighborhood Preservation Crime Prevention Act 1. 000. 0 1.900.0 881.9 NA 2,500.0 2,500.0

NYC School Security9 Officer Program NA 415.0 250.0

NYS Defenders' Association 442.4 442.4 540.0 572.0 29.3% 630.0 797.5

Offender Aid and 6 Restoration Program NA 50.0

Prisoners' Legal Services 1. 361. 8 1. 361.8 2,207.1 2.545.4 86.9% 2.679.3 2,784.2

Soft Body Armour lO Reimbursement Program 635.5 535.5 309.8 403.0 -36.6% 487.0

Special Narcotics Court Program 3.386.3 3.589.5 4,589.8 4.739.0 39.9% 4.818.1 4.902.6

Special Warrant Enforcement 11 Enhancement Program 2.499.4 7.,347.9 )jA 2.499.5 2.499.8

Continued - Next Page

-42-


Table 4-Continued

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES LOCAL ASS·r STANCE PROGRAM FUND I NG

(ThousaRds of Dollars)

EX12enditures A1212ro12riations % Change


Suffolk Re-Route6

Transitional Program for Ex-Offenders NA 260.0

Target Crime 1 Initiative Program 2 37,444.4 40,678.7 46,619.2 48.471.4 29.4% 50.279.5 52.516.2

Transit Crime 13 Interdiction Program 1.322.6 NA 1. 486.0 1.510.5

Transit Strike Force14 3,500.0 3.745.0 3.404.4· NA 3.353.9 3,474.6

Community.Patro19

Officer Program NA 100.0 150.0

westchester Datafacs 6 NA 85.0

TOTAL 60.722.3 72,900.4 87,696.1 88.130.9 45.1% 99,016.1 109,107.3

This program was implemented in FY 1984-85. FY 1985-86 appropriation of $1,000,000 was reappropriated for FY 1986-87 and again for FY 1987-88.

2 No funds were appropriated for this program in FY 1982-83.

3 Agencies are reimbursed for expenditures from the "NYC" and "Statewide" (non-NYC) lump sum appropriations for this program.

4 FY 1985-86 was the first year the State received these federal block grant funds. Expenditures and estimated appropriations for this federally funded program are based on the State's fiscal year.

5 Expenditures and estimated appropriations for this federally funded program are based on the·State's fiscal year.

6 This program was implemented in FY 1987-88.

This federally funded program was implemented in FY 1987-88. Appropriations are based on the State's fiscal year.

8 This Act was established in FY 1983-84.


10 In FY 1984-85 the administration of this program was transferred from the Department of Labor to the Division of Criminal Justice Services. Unallocated FY 1985-86 monies were reappropriated for FY 1986-87.


12 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84. The FY 1982-83 funds are the combined expenditures of the three programs that were merged to form TCI: the State Felony Program, the Major Violent Offense Trial Program, and the Major Offense Prosecution Program.

13 -,hl·S . 1 t d· FY 198586 program was Imp emen e In -.

14 This program was imolemented in FY 1983-84.

SOURCE: NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services.

-43-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Parole 1 Resource Centers

Parole Transitiona,2 Faci 1 ities

'Employment Services3

Project

TOTAL

FY 82-83

529.4

529.4

Table 5

DIVISION OF PAROLE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Expenditures

FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86

668.9 706.1 798.4

37.1 286.9 430.8

706.0 993.0 1.229.2

1 This program is funded through the State Operations Budget.

% Change 82 vs 85

50.8%

NA

NA

132.2%

NEw YORK STATE

Acorooriations

FY 86-87 FY 87-88

1.035.8 1.192.2

626.3 626.3

700.0 700.0

2.887.1 2.518.5

2 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84 and is funded through the State Operations Budget.

3 This program was implemented in FY 1986~87.


-44-

IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 6

DIVISION OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exoenditures

Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86

Classification 1

Alternatives 2.336.S

Demonstration Projects BOD.O 1.240.0 2.383.2 4.750.7

Direct S.' 'v ices 182.1 20B.4 184.1 228.0

Intensive Supervision/ Alternative Sentencing Program 3.25B.1 3.567.4 4.431.1 5,21B.4

PINS Program2

Regular State Aid 28.610.9 31,543.2 34.386.9 37.B61.3

TOTAL 32.851.1 36,5?9.0 41.385.3 50.395.3

1 This program was irmplemented in FY 1985-86.



-45-

% Change 82 vs 85

NA

493.9%

25.2%

60.2%

NA

32.3%

53.4%

NEW YORK STATE

A!2!2ro!2riations

FY 86-87 FY 87-BB

3.045.9 3.312.B

5.478.5 5.411.5

273.8 266.7

7,777.2 10.257.6

1. 000. 0 2.505.0

41. 663.3 44.804.2

59.238.8 66.557.8

------------- -- ~--


Table 7

DIVISION FOR YOUTH LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


EXQ~nditures AOQroQriations

FY 85-861 % Change Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 82 'IS 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Community-Based2

Organizations 324.8 318.0 NA 466.5 466.5

Community Care3

Initiative NA 500.0 500.('

Detention

Non-Secure 4,000.0 3,200.0 3.]00.0 10,600.4 165.0% 6,770.3 9,900.0

Secure 9,177.4 10,684.7 13,325.6 25,101.8 173.5% 14.738.3 15,500.0 . 4

Job Development NA 697.5 583.0

Runaway and Homeless Youth Services 1.206.3 1. 522. 0 1,594.3 1,838.8 52:4% 2,409.0 2,570.0

Special Delinquency Prevention Program 12,380.7 12,359.2 13,458.2 11,745.0 -5.1% 13,351.8 14,281.8

Special Legislative Contracts 1.857.5 2,339.0 3,100.1 4,509.1 142.7% 6,496.4 6,018.0

Transitional Independent 5 Living Support 87.8 NA 2,200.0 2,220.0

Voluntary Agency Care 19,000.0 20,330.0 21.730.0 52,710.8 177 . 4% 28,100.0 26,300.0

Youth Development and De linquency Prevention 29,500.0 29,675.0 29,675.0 77,307.5 162.1% 40,600.0 41.500.0

TOTAL 77,121.9 80,109.9 86,908.0 184,219.1 1.38.9% 116,329.8 119,839.3

1 The FY 1985-86 OFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a result of Governor Cuomo's recommendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also eliminate arrearages.




S This program was implemented in FY 1985-86.

SOURCE: NYS Division for Youth.

-46-

v STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

FY 82-83

DOCS F ac il it i es 445,537.8

DFY Fac i 1 it ies 58,460.3

TOTAL 503,998.1

FY 83-84

DOCS Facilities 103.820.0

DFY Faci lities 5,089.5

TOTAL 108,909.5

TABLE 1A

CAPACITY AND STAFF SUMMARY (June 1987)

Capacity Staff

DOCS Facilities 38,188

2,027

40,215

21,369

2,760

24,129

DFY Facilities

TOTAL

TABLE 1B

OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY (Thousands of Dollars)

Exoenditures % Change

FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85

525.228.2 598.305.9 602,846.5

64,063.6 71.988.9 76,135.5

589,291.8 670,294.8 678,982.0

TABLE 1C

CAP IT AL I MPROVEMENT BUDGET SUHMARY (Thousands of Dollars)

Exoenditures

FY 84-85

174,376.6

3,441.1

177,817.7

FY 85-86

96,465.2

2,366.7

98,831.8

-47-

Tota 1

374,661.8

10,897.3

385,559.0

35.3%

30.2%

34.7%

NEW YORK STATE

Aoorooriations

FY 86-87 FY 87-88

670,107.0 728,920.9

78,541.4 82,519.1

748,648.4 811,440.0

Aoorooriations

FY 86-87

229,596.9

4.503.5

234.100.4

FY 87-88

44.079.0

4.573.2

48,652.2

APPENDIX A

EXPLANATORY NOTES

EXPLANATORY NOTES

ANALYSES

The statistics presented in this document include frequencies, percents, percent changes, rates, and rate rank scores.

Percent changes are sensitive to relatively small changes in absolute numbers when the numbers used to calculate the percent changes are low. In addition, the percent change is not a valid indicator of change when the number reported for the base year (the 1982 calendar year or the 1982-83 fiscal year) is zero (0). In such instances the notation "NA" is used.

Rates are ranked from high to low; e.g., if the rates for an activity in the 62 counties ranged from 200.0 to 50.0 per 100,000 population, the highest rate (200.0) would be ranked on~ (1) and the lowest rate (50.0) would be ranked 62. Rank values for both the public assistance data and the county jail and penitentiary data reflect the rankings for only the 57 non-New York City count i es, maki ng the range for rank values of these data one (1) to 57. It is important to note that the rank calculations do not take into consideration the magnitude of the differences betwe~n the ranked rates. Also, dramatic changes in rank scores should be interpreted with caution. The sensitivity of rates to relatively small changes in absolute numbers increases as the size of the population decreases. For example, an incre~se of one (1) in a given activity in a county with 5,000 residents will cause the value of the rate to increase by 20, while an increase of one (1) in a county with 50,000 residents will cause the value of the rate to increase by only two (2).

The Bureau of Census provisional population estimates for 1985 that are reported in Section I were used for all population-based rate calculations presented in the briefing book with the exception of those reported for "Index Crimes Known to the Police" (Section III: Table 1). Index crime rates were calculated using population estimates provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. These population data were used rather than the Bureau of Census population data to maintain comparability with Index crime rates reported in the annual NYS Crime and Justice publication. FBI population data are used because the production of this annual publication begins before the more authoritative Bureau of Census population data become available.

The New York State Department of Motor Vehicles provided the data on licensed drivers in New York State that was used to calculate the rate of DWI arrests per 1,000 licensed drivers (Section III: Table 2-E).

SECTION I CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES

Criminal justice agencies located within or providing direct services to the county are presented in this section.

A-I

SECTION II DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

The demographic and socioeconomic data presented in this section were provided by a number of sources.

o NYS Department of Commerce (personal per capita income data) o NYS Department of Education (high school dropout data) o NYS Department of Labor (labor force data) o NYS Department of Social Services (public assistance program data) o New York State Statistical Yearbook: 1983-84 (squaTe miles and

1970-80 population change data) o U.S. Bureau of the Census (population, age, race, and ethnicity data)

SECTION III CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY

It is important to note that in instances where multiple offenses are reported for an event, the offense classification for the event is generally determined by the most serious offense reported for that event. However, the criteria which agencies have developed to rank crimes by seriousness may differ among the statistical systems operated by State agenci es. As a result, a robbery that is identified as the most serious offense in a multiple crime event by one agency may not be identified as the most serious crime that occurred during an event by another agency.

The characteristics of the data presented in Section III vary across tables. Table 1 in this appendix defines data populations, units of count, offender types, and offense c~tegories by table. The data sources are also i dent ifi ed.

SECTION IV LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

The expenditures and appropriations for local assistance programs funded with federal monies are based on the State's fiscal year.

SECTION V STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

DOCS capacity data reflect both housing and "other" categories, such as transit units and reception centers; they exclude temporary spaces, Special Housing Unit cells, and hospital spaces. DFY capacity data reflect the number of youths that can be housed at a facility and is contingent upon both available space and number of staff.

DOCS 'staff data reflect both full-time and part-time staff, while DFY staff data reflect full-time equivalent staff.

The operating budget and capital improvement budget expenditures include monies spent both within and outside the county. The DOCS facility-based budget does not include centralized billings. DFY's facility-based budget excludes centralized billings and monies budgeted for regional offices and aftercare workers.

A-2

:x:I

W

I"BlE I Char'tl."sllC' of OJta Pr .. enled in Serlion IIf: Cria. and Crlllnat Justice Aclivity

lEHt_. ______________ '-"P02ul ali on Unit of Counl Ollender Type Dilen," [alegory

lable I lum CRIHES y'!1O~N TO litE rOllCE Index ollen •• s lno"n to h. Victh-basedl Durder Hot applicable. FDI Index offense dfl-enlore ••• nl Igencles in He. York loreible rapt iailions spannIng Slile lor a gaven year. aggraviled IUlull lelonies Ind oisde-

Siructure-buedl burgliry aunors lor t~e Evenl-bls.dl robbery sped lied alhn.u.

hrcfnY 'e,duding Dotor vehicle tbelll

Vehicle-band: Golar vehicl. theft

lh. unit 01 cDunl Ii bH.d on Ihe oost urious o/lens. in , cri .. evenl •

--------- .. - -----------_ .. _-------- ~~-

Tabl e 2A fELONY AND "ISDEHE.NOR ARRESIS Adult felony and .i,deaunor a(rnt An arrul event. The oast urlous Adult • felony Arrests evenls thai occurred during A given charge phced againsl an olhnder lor "Isdel.anar Arresli

Table 18 fELONY AND HISDEHEANOR ARRESTS: yeu. an arrut evenl i 5 counled ueepl lor Janulry Ihrough June, 1987 violenl lelony counls .hich rellect

arresl evenh Ihal included al le .. t I,ble 2C ARF.ESTS fOP. SELECIED OffENSES one chuge lor a viohnt felony

ollen" Iislrd in Appendi. E.

Table ~D A~P.ESIS FOR POSSfSSIOII AlID SALE Of DRUGS Adult lelony and a .. delflnor arre~t An arrest e.ent: fvenl. occurrIng dUring. given year Ihat Include at lea~t one charge lor drugs INe. Yurk Siale Penal In -Sf[lion~ 22~ and nil.

fable 2£ fUnNY hND HI5DEH£t1IlOk .PokE5IS Adull felony and ."deleanor arrest fO~ DWf O,FENSES even Is occurring dUllng a given yur

Ihal Include al leasl one charge lor I ~WI ollense IVet,tele and Traffic La.: SI a leal Ileo York - Sec II on 11m.

---

Sourcf , ~ .. arts

HVS Division 01 Cri,ind Justice Services, Uni /orl Cril. Reporting Syst •••

------

HVS Division 01 Crilina! Justic. 5ervices, Arrests and Proce •• inq lrend. File.

MrS Divhion 01 [ruinal Ju.tice 5ervice., Drug Arrtsls Ind Proce.sing Trends file.

HY5 Diyision 01 Criunal Ju.tice S.rvicu, OWl Arr .. t and P/oc",5ing Trends fil ••

I [onlinued on Ih. nex! page. I

::x:> I

+:>

IA9LE I (h"dclert~tlCs 01 Data Presented In Secllon III; Cri.e and Crulnal Ju~tice Atlivity - Continued

h~le Population Unit of Counl

Iabl e JA fELONY IH~ICIHEHIS Felony indithenls and superior Delendanl-indiclaent/superior cour! tour I inlorulions filed during inloradionlSCII ba~edi eath delendant a gIVen ye.r. oued io ~n indldaent/SCI h counted.

lhe ADs! seri OUI tharge placed against a delendant is eounled extept lor violent lelony counls .hieh relied indiclunlslSCI'l thai includ~ al leul one chuge lor a vlohnt felony ollense lilted In Appendi. E.

Table 38 fElOHV INDIClHE~IS:

January Ihrough June, 1981

hbl e lA DISP05lllONS RESUlIlHS fROM DISposilions occurring during" given Disposition based; rich arrest evenl FElOHY AND HISDE"EAHOR AR~E5lS' ye., Ihal resulted IroD adull lei any that resullEd in " di sposition is

and Disde.eanor arresl evenls .hith counted. Counls are based on Ihe occurred alter Dec •• ber l', 1969. year GI senlencing lor convidi ons

and on Ihe YEir 01 disposition lor acquittals, di ui5sais, not pro~eculed,

labl. 48 D1SPOSITlO~S RESULlINS fRO" fELONY nRRESIS Dispositions occurring during" given and 'other' disp05ition~. 'Other' year that resulle~ Iro. adull lelony Intludes 'Cises disposed by civil arrest evenls Ihal oCturred after procedure, ahated by Ihe death 01 • aecelter Jt. 19b9. ~elendanl, elc.

------l,ble 5A fELONY, Hlm~EANOR, AND LESSER OffENSE ConvlClion disposiilons, lor .hleh CGnvlcllon based; eath arresl event

CDtIYllllO:IS hESULlllIS fROn FELONY AHO senlentes .ere up05.d dUring a given re5ulling in ~oln • tonviction and nISD£nEMIOR Af.F.ESTS year, Ihat rHulled Irca adult felony senlente is tounled. Onl y Ihe 0051

and Indel.lner arrest evenls thai senous thuge is count.d except lor octurr Ed ., I Er Decuber Jl, t 9b9. violent lelony counts .hieh,relled

convielion ~venls thai include il lead one tonvicllon cha,rge IGr •

Table 58 fElONY, 1t1SfiEHEhNOIi. AND LEmp. OfFENSE Conviellon dlsposillons, lor .hlCh violenl 1~lony Dilen,. lisled in CONYICTIOHS RESULTINS fRon FELONY ARRESTS 5.nIH,c05 .ere unosEd dUflng i gi ven ~pp.ndi. E.

year, Ihal ff~ulled Irol adult Iflony uresl ev~r.l. lto.t octurred ~lIer Dete.bfr JI, 1969.

OllendH TYoe Offense C~hgorv Sourt~ .. ~eaarks

Adult I Felony Indictaenlsl MYS Division 01 Criainal Justite Juveni I. Offender It Superior Court Inluru- Servites, Indithenl Shlislical

liuns. Syst ...

Mull I Convictions fon I HYS Division of Criainal Justice Felony 0llense5 jervices, Arrest and Processing fti5deaeanor Off en5es frends File. hsser Oil ens.s

IHol ~pplit.ble lor acquit Ii I, di SAi 55011 , and 'olher' di 5posi-lions. I

---------- ~. ---- ---- --- ,

~du\t • Convictions Irln MYS Division 01 Cruinal Justice hlony 0llense5' Services, Arrest and ~ro[fssing "isd •• unor Oll.nses Trends Fil •• lesser Ollenses

I Continued on Ihe ne.t page. )

:I=I

(Jl

UHE I [h""lerts!lc~ of Ddt, Presenled In Secllon III: Cri •• and Crlllnal Ju~lice Aclivity - Conlinued

!~~IL__ P02!!l~lion Unl t of Cgunt Of /ender IY2t Offense Calegory Source , Reaa!.:;.~_,,-' _____ .!.

~--.---~-

lahle bA SENlEkt ES ~S A PERCENI OF TOIAL CONVIClIDNS Convielioo disposilions, for .huh Conviction bued; oach uresl evenl Adult .f Convictions Ion HYS Division of Cri.ind Juslict 5enlfnce5 oer. i.postd dunn, • resulting in both. eooYleiloo Ind· felonr Ollensts S.rvices, Arlest and ProcHsing

la~le bB SENlENC [S ~S A PERCENI Of fElONY OR given year, thai rtsulted Irol adult sentence i, counled. Cnl y Ihl lost Hi,d •• e.nor OllfnteS Irendt file. nl£HHE ~ND~ ;'110 LESSER OFffNSE COHI'ICTWNS lei ony and &I ,de.unor ur esl eyenls serious senlenct in a lultiple tenlence Less.r 011 enses

Ihd occurred aller Decetbtr It, f969. of hnEf is counled. 'other' .entences include cases, for •• uple, .her. a license ... suspendtd or revoked' f.itl,out finol.

I.ble 7A PROP.nIDU O[PARlHE"1 AClIVIlY Intate cas.s received dUflng a given Co.plaint-bas.d; oach cOlphint is f uil y Cour I: n.hin.d/Arresltd for: HYS Division of Probation and rear. counled as one case. Ad.1t t frlony Dffense Correclional AlternatiYes:

Juv.ni Ie D.linquent "isde •• anor Dlleon In,.sllgallons ordered dUflng a given lnvutigallon-based; each i~vutigalion Person in Heed 01 Lesser Off.nse - fully Court - Annual co.pilation year. ordered is counted as one ca~e. 5upervi sion fPINSI ooly JuY.nile Deling of the 'Honthly Reporl of ruily

Cri.,na! Court: status Ol/.nse - Workload in Probation Depirhenh R'qu.st-based; uch pre-dispOSItion Rtq.:.t ·bas.d, each pre-dl5potit ion Adult a ani r fINS ffora Ho. OP-30). supervislOn/serYlCe request.d is supervision/service r.que~1 is counled Juvenile Offender II

co.nted as one case. as one case. Cri.ina! Court - Annual cO'pili-tion of tht 'nonthly Re~ort of

frobalioR ~upervl~lon ra~e~ received Sent.nce-based, each senlencr to Adjudi cati oo/Conyict ion Crhinal Workload in Prob.tion dUrln~ a q,,'en year. probation is (ounted as one case. lor: Depulaents Ifora No, DP-30A! for

felonr Offense invesligation and pre-disposition Probataon !upefvi5loR ca!e~ !upecv,sed Hi sd ..... nor Offente dahl and lhe frobiliun dUring a given ytar lI.e., probahon Less.r Off.nses - Regi ~tr ant Systeo for all oU •• r cases r.celved dUring a 91'1.n rear only Juvenile Delinq data. plus proballon superVISion cases S.tatus Dff.nse -carried over froJ Deco.bEr It of Ihe only fiNS prevIous vearl.

Proballon supervision c.:es undor :,up.rvlslon on Dtc •• ~er II 01 a g".n y.ar.

labl. ]B ff'DBA 11 Oil REVOCATf OUS frobalion superVISion cases for .hicb Revocd i on-based; each probation probation Has revoked durln9 a giv.n supervision CiH lor .hich probation yeAr • ~iS r.vo~fd it cour,t.d is one

-

f Continued on Ihe next page. I

» I

m

I~FlE I CiurJclerlstics of n.h Presented in Section III: Crlle and C(lllna! Justice Activity - ContiRurd

~.------- . Populallon UnilJ!j;!!!!~t Offender !vPf Ollen;e CAlfgorv Saurce , Re.,rh

Iabl. OA AlIE~HAIIVE5 10 INr~aCERAIION PR05RAHS, [a!es processed by 'deJonslrAtion' Case-basrdj if aore tban on. CUt N4S Adult J Arresh or [onvictions NYS Divisio~ of Prob"lion and DEHONSIP.AIIOII PROJECTS projects dUflnq • given Statr IIscli opened lor lh. Ute client, lOch Cise Juvenil e 01l.n4e(5 II fan Corr.clior,at Alternative!!

yur. ts counled. Felon, Ol/fnsfS nisdeleano( Ollenses

IJble BS I'REIRIAL R£LE.1SE PROGR~~, 1986 CHes proces!fd by 'classificAtionl Lesser Offenses altorn.liye bill' projects during

labl. BC [ONNUI/ITV SERVICE PROGRAN, 1906 19B6.

Iabl. aD OfffHOER-eASEO .1QVOCACY PR06RAM, 198.

Ilbl. BE SPECIAlIlED ALTERNATIVES, 1986 ~

I Continued on Ih. next p~ge.

):> I

-....J

I~~lf I [h""lorlslles of n.ta Prp,s.nted in SoetiDII 111: [ri •• and Cria ... 1 Juslice Activity - Conlinued

'------h~l~ _____________ .!:~~2!tlatiO" Unil of Couhl Of!!tl!d~r Iype Of/ense Calegory Source , R •• dfh

~----------------------.--------------------r---------------------.-----------.------------.----------------~

1,;10 9.

I'~le 98

JAIL ~ PflillENlIARY ~DHI5SI0~S

JAIL ~ fEUIIEIIlIAR'{ CAPACIlV AND POPULA! lilll

Ad.i~sion5 of bolh d.taiud and ~enltnced InlJles 10 ceunly/NYC jatls .nd penilenUarm in Nell Yorl Shle during a qlven yeu lor "talnd. CIVil, and federAl ollfn~es.

A Cfn~us 01 bolh deli .. ed and ~.nle",ed inul.~ in county/NYC Jails and penlt.nlu".s In He. Yor~ Stale lor CIVil, [(I ... d, and lederal oll.n~ .. is ~r.~enled lor each a' Ih. populations Ih,t '0110.:

Inutes under custody on Decelbu 31 01 a gtven year, and

Ihe d~ily Average 0/ inutes undu cu~16dy during ~ qlv.n year.

A census a' bed~ In counly/NYC Jall~ and penitentiaries In NeM VOl k Siat.. E~ch Jail lnd penitentiary census 0" t .ten on a dillereni day dUring a Qtven yur.

Adds5ion b.~ed. It is i.porhnt to. nob Ihat if an individual is .daitte~ lore Ihan onc~ on Ihe 511' charge. .I~b Id.i5Sioo is counled.

Population is in .. l. based lor bolh Ihe 'Oecuber ll' and 'average daily' popuhlions.

Adult I

[apully is bued on hedsl the counl I Hot applicable. dillers by r.eglon:

He. Yorl City Oepartaenl of Correction counls tell HI 'beds al shndlrd' lone inule per c.lI; 60 ~quore left per incale; and no lore Ihan ~O an a dor.I, Ihe count do.s Hot Include beds In hospi tal pr HGn wards.

and doraHory beds. Ihis count does nGI includ~ delention or holding rools.

Detaioed .d.i5i1ons: feloi'¥ Arresh Hi5dff~dnor Arresh lesser 0llenie5

Sentenced Idliuion51 "isd •••• nGr CGnv. Lt5!er Ollense [onv.

Hot appticabh.

MYS COaliuloo of Correction, Sheriffs Annud R.porh:

The 'Stlle"ide Co.pilation 01 &Jih Irol 1985 5herilf~' Annud Reports· induded the loll owing CiVelll .... Ihe Sheri 115' Annud Reports represent set/reporled ddl collecl.d by the county jilts ... Oill.renc.s .xis~ in r~cordkeeping pr ~ctices nang th.se various counli.s ... the Co .. ission adYlses c,tution when using data to cOlpare one county to another.'

"on-He. York Clly jail counls rellect

l (

the nuober 01 c.lts lone bed per [elll

'------.-.---___ L _______ -L ________ l.-____ --'-____ . _____ --'-

I Con Ii nued on Ihe next page. I

:P I

en

1~9LE I (har.cler,,!tc< of ~ll. Pre .. nled In Section III: Cru. and Ctllln.1 JU<tiCf ActiVlly - Continued

!.._----------,-----------:---:-.,-----------::-:-:--:--:-----------=:--:--------:-:-:--:-:--------:-----_ .... !41IL ____ • __ ._____ fopuhtlon lluil.!!l Counl Ofl!ndet Type Offense C.lelliY 50utce , Remis

l-_. _ .... _---Ilbl e 1".'1 AD~IS5WHS 10 IIEW YORr. SlATE PRISON Ad.issions 10 H1S prison daring I Inlale ba<ed, p.roh dehi.ee • .,~ Adult I felony Convidions HYS Deplrhenl 01 Correchonal

given yeu. n~t counted as part 01 Ihe .daisslons Services. or under cuslody poputali on. Only Ih. losl urious convidior. o//en •• is Th~ ·und.r custody' couols oay

bbl. \{'A'1 HE~ (fiU~l COMI1~,H1S 10 STAlE PRISON He. courl coui t.eois 10 HYS pri .on tounlea. Ollen<e. counted IS violent diller <lightly Irol dat. la~le I('A during a given YHt. lelonie. It. lisled in Appendix E. ptesenled in tepotts .lId

publitalions te!used by ~OCS. l,ble \.'. 11I~~IE5 WMR (U5IOPY !II SlATE fRI5~N A census of In •• les undet cuslody In

011 HClHPln JI . NYS pri.on on Oeee.het 11 of • given year.

IJble \lIC mOLE fiEfAilIEES IN SlATE fWO» Patole detunees In WiS pli.on on Detain.e bHed. 011 PElWER 31 Pete.ber 1t.

~-----.--- - ---- -------- ----------

-- -IJ~le itA PioROLf 5UPERIJISI0I1 ColSES Inules releas.d to the NYS Division Ease based' lone person per tlsel. Adull I Convictions fOri HYS Division of Parole,

of Pdtole for supetVHlon "IIhin Ihe Juveni Ie Ol/ender .. felony Of/en.e. Stale. Hisdf.eanor 01len<e5 The i.cruse in parolf rfvocations

resulling frol new felony convic-~arDle SUPHvl~IQn CAHS supervised lions refleds legislali,e cbanges JUling • given year Ii,e., puole and i.ptoy-ed efficiency of thf tases teeeived dutlng a given yelf puole re,Qution process. It plus p.tol. superviSion CasfS cartied pt i.~ry helot .as the pH5age of ov.t froJ Oeee.berli of Ihe previous legislation, incorpot~ted inlo vurl. Ihe DiviSion'. rule. and regula-

tion. ef/fclive "o,,..b.( I, 1984, fatale superviSion case. under super- luthDriting the Parole Board tD '1SIon on efc •• bet 11 of a gi ve,1 yell. i~suf a /inal dechtation of de-

hb\e I!~ fi[~nm "'tiD RElUP,SEO f'';f;ill[[S Parole superviSIon cases lot .hlCh Iloguency lor teleasees convicted L4 ne. felonifs coullted under

parole .as tevoted and Ite patGlee supervision and receiVing ne. returned to ptlsor. durinq a qivert ye.,. indetetOlnate s.nl.nets. ~ lind

dedd/alloo of delinquency slteaa-lines Ihe viol.tion ptOee~5 in the.e cases by obrut ing the need for. finll te~ocation heating. lhe streullned ptoee55 hJS tesulled in an inctedSed ptopor-lion at return. lor tl~. (onvie' lion ••

'---- -.... ---- ....

I (ontlnued on the nexl page. I

:x:I

I.D

WIE I fh".defl,llcs 01 D.t. PI .. ~nted In Section III: Cri •• and CllOinal Justice Activity - Continued

.. !J~I~_______ Populalion Unil 01 Count ullen~~ Ollen~e C!!£gory Soulee ,. R ... lh

-lable 12 JU'lfNILf OfFfHDfRS Viohnt lelony arrest events Ihat An arnst evenl. Juvenile Ollender It Arrests, Indldunh, MYS Division 01 Crilind Justice

occurred durinQ a givtn yeil. .nd Dispositions lor Services: Juveill Ie Ollenders Violenl felony Offenses. Arreils lnd Processing Trends

Vlolenl lei any Indid.enls and Delend.nl-indichenl/~upt(ior courl file and Ibe Indichent supellor court inlorullons filed inlorulion ISCII based; each delendant Stalhlic~1 Syste •• dUI i ng a gl Vfn year. nued in an indiclaenl/SCI is counled.

DHposllion~ oceurflng dUring a iiven Dispol iIi or. basfd; eacb arresl evenl yelr Ihal resulted fro. violenl felony Ihat resulted in. dilposilion. Counts .arrests evr=nh. are based on Ihe yur 01 disposition lor

acquittals, dislllSih, nol pro~fCuled, rfloved 10 fuily court, and 'other.' Only Ihe oost urious sentence In a Gultiple sentence dispcqlion is counted.

~-------- .. ---------- ------ ----

I An adult 15 an ollender tlho 15 16 years 01 1ge or older at Ii.e of arresl.

II A Juvenile Ollender is a per~on 14 or 15 years of age .he i~ crioinally responsible lor a specified lei any iClIs! hee Appendix IIi and a person 11 years 01 age ~ha is crhinaJly responsible lor an act Nhich constitutes ,econd degree lurd., lS defined in subdivisions one and ho 01 Seclion 1~5.25 01 Ihe fend lu. [riainal eourl! have original juri~diction over juvenile offenders who .re prosecuted as aduHs. A eriaind court can .aive OrigInal Jurt~dlttlon and reaove a 'juvenile ol/ender' to , .. ily court .here lhal person is reclassilied IS a 'Iuvenile delinquenl.'

APPENDIX B

DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS AND

CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTIVITY

STATE SUMMARIES BY COUNTY FOR 1985 AND 1986

SELEmo DEHOGAAPHIC AND SOCIOECUIIOHIC CIIARACIERlsms BY cuum fOR 1905 AND IV06

SflECIED DE"06RA~HIC AND SDCIOECOHOHIC CHARACTERISTICS ----------.. _--------------------_ .. -- ----------------------------------- -----------------------.. - .. _--.. _---- --------------------------_ ... _------ -----------------

Honthl y Aver agel Publii: High nonthl r Aver age Recei ving

Population Density School Dropouts Unuployed Public Assistance Populati on Per Square Hi Ie ---------------- ---------... ----- -----------------

------------------- --.. ---------.. ----- Percent Percent Percent COUHIY Year Huaber Rank Densi tv Rank Percent Rank Percent fl~nt Percent flank --------------

ALBANY 1906 28l,400 12 m It 3.0 31 4.2 56 2.9 44 198~ 28l,866 12 m 14 l.4 45 4.2 56 2.9 H

ALLE6ANY • 1906 50,500 4B 49 54 2.6 SO 8.1 20 9.2 1985 .. 50,902 41 H 54 l.4 n 1.9 20 9.2

BRONI 19B6 I, J9l,600 6 18,419 3 12.1 2 0.4 16 .0 58 19B~ 1,184,154 6 28,194 1 12.l 2 9.1 12 .0 sa

BROOME 1986 210,800 18 296 19 t.O 30 5.9 42 1.7 29 1985 212,HJ 18 298 19 U II 5.9 42 l.S l4

OJ CATTARAUGUS 1996 85.100 12 65 H l.8 lB U.8 II 6.2 II • ..... 1985 a5,335 12 65 t1 4.4 28 9.0 13 6.1 12

CAYUGA 1986 19,900 lS 115 32 5.0 12 7.1 28 5.5 14 1985 19,851 l5 115 12 U 23 1.0 24 S.B IS

CHAUTAUQUA 1986 143.100 23 134 28 l.9 Jt D.O 24 1.6 5 1985 141,231i 21 136 29 4.1 34 1.6 26 1.0 1

CHEHUNG 1986 90,500 29 220 .21 5.l II 6.& J6 S.O 1 1985 91,992 28 22t 21 t.S 21 8.l 11 8.7 2

CHENIIN60 1986 50,000 t9 56 52 l.B 3S 6.8 11 l.l 1t 1995 49,96l 49 56 52 l.9 36 1.2 14 3.2 l8

CLINTON 1986 BI,200 14 18 tl 5.0 U. S.4 11 4.1 19 1985 8i.571 11 18 41 4.9 19 1.5 30 4.7 21

COLUMBIA 1m 60,100 19 9S 19 t.t 20 t.l 55 3.3 31 1985 60,602 39 95 l8 5.1 14 t.5 51 1.6 12

----------------- .. --- .. ------------------------------------------~------------ .. ---------.. ------..... -------------------------------.!.---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I Continued on nell pige. I

S(lECTED DElIOGRAPHTC AND SOCIOECONO~IC CIIARACTERISlICS BY COUNIY fOR 1~85 AHD 1986 - Continued

SHWED DEhOGRAfHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS --- ------ -_ ..... _ .. -----_ ... _-- ----_ .. ----- --------------------_ .. ----------- .. - --------------------_ .. _------------ ---------------------------------- -----------------

/lonthl y Aver dget Public High Honthl y Aver age Recei ving

Population Density School Dropou15 Uneaployed Pub I ic Assi shoce Population Per Square nile --------------_ .... ---------------- -----------------

------.. --_ .. -------- --------_ .. __ .. ----- Percenl Percent Percent COUNTY Year Hueber Rank Density Rank tercent Rank Percent nank Percenl Rank -_ .. _-------.. -- -----_ .. _-- .

CORTLAND 1m U,400 50 95 39 ~.J 10 6.Y JS 6.5 10 19B5 41,392 ~o 95 39 1.1 55 Y.O H 6.6 8

DELAWARE 19B61 47,100 51 11 56 ~.1 27 U 45 1.J J5 19B5 46,BBO 51 lJ 5B 5.0 16 6.4 40 1.6 lJ

DUTCHESS 1986 256,800 15 319 IS 4.2 26 l.B 60 1.8 54 1985 255,106 15 JI7 10 4.5 26 1.6 61 1.9 53

ERIE 1986 9~'17OD 1 922 II J.4 H 7.2 31 S.2 2 1985 971,306 7 m 1I 3.3 49 7.1 32 0.2 3

OJ ESSEl 1986 36, lOO 56 20 60 3.2 40 9.9 6 5.4 16 1 N I ~85 36,364 56 20 66 5,0 15 9.6 a 6.0 13

I fRANKLIN 19B6 43,800 52 27 59 2.9 55 10.7 5 6.B B 1985 43,793 52 27 59 ., 1.5 41 9.5 9 7.2 6

FULTO~ 19B6 54 1600 45 110 31 5.9 7 11.4 4.7 20 1985 55,411 45 III J3 5.0 17 13.1 4.4 25

GENESEE 1986 58, BOO 41 119 31 J.4 45 8.6 Il 2.B 47 19B5 59,053 H IIY 31 3.1 ~(J 7.9 n 2.0 4/

GREENE 1986 42,100 53 65 4B 4.3 "24 1.3 29 2.5 50 JqB5 41,m 53 64 48 5,5 10 B.5 16 2.B 47

HAMILlDN 1986 5,000 62 J 62 3.2 47 12.4 2.0 45 1905 4,905 b2 3 62 2.8 59 11.9 3.2 37

HERKIMER 1986 6b,900 l7 47 56 4.3 25 9.9 1 4.1 26 1985 66,919 37 47 56 U 25 9.2 II U ~6

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ------------------------.. _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, Conllnued on nerl page. I

SELECIED DEMOGRAPIIIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CIiARACTERISlICS bV CQUNTY fOR 1985 AND 19~6 - Continued

SElECTED DEn06RAfHIC AND SOCIOECONOnlC CHhRACIERISTlCS ---- ...... _ .. _-.. -- .. _--------------- ... ----- --_ ... _-----_ ...... ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ----_ .. _---------_ ... _---------- .. _---- -----------------

"anthl V Averaqe. Public tliqh "anthl y Average Recei vinq

Popuhlioo Density School Dropouts Uneaplayed Public AssIStance Popuhlion Per Square Hi Ie --------.. -----_ ... ---------------- -----.. - .. ---.. _----

------------------ .. ------------------ Percent Percent Percent [DUm Year Hueber Rank Density Rank Percent Roink Percent Rink ferrent Rillk -------.. ------ , ----------

J£FfERSOH 1m ~O,600 2B 71 42 5.1 8 11.4 3 M 13 1985 BB,~81 29 70 41 U 24 12.3 2 6.b 10

kiNGS '19B6 2,291,200 32,160 2 B.B 3 6.6 12 .0 58 1985 2,281,395 32,620 2 11.0 1 9.1 7 .0 5B

lEWIS 1986 25,100 59 20 61 2.2 61 9.5 9 4.6 22 19B5 25,165 59 20 61 3.0 57 9.1 10 4.4 24

lIVIH6SlOH 19B6 58,600 U 93 40 2.2 60 7.1 32 3.0 42 1985 59,328 42 n 40 3.0 58 5. J H 2.0 45

OJ HADlSOH 1986 66,600 38 102 34 4.7 19 7.8 26 2.5 48 , 1985 66,743 1B 102 14 4.6 22 6. W 37 2.B 48 w

HONROE 1986 702,6~0 9 I,ObO 10 4.0 29 5.0 51 7.0 7 1985 704,876 9 1,063 10 4.7 21 4. J ~S 6.1 9

NONT60NERY 1986 52,100 46 129 29 4.1 28 U B 4.0 27 1985 52,521 46 130 29 4.9 20 9.9 5 3.1 30

NASSAU 1986 1,321,000 4,610 2.1 62 4.0 58 1.3 56 m5 1,331,343 4,619 2.3 hi 4.2 51 1.4 56

HEM YORK 1966 1,47B,OOO 67,182 14.7 1.0 H .0 58 1965 1,479,775 61,263 18.4 7.5 29 .0 58

NIAGARA 1986 216,900 11 412 15 4.4 22 0.9 10 1.4 6 1965 216,493 17 412 15 U 32 9.0 6 1.6 5

ONEIDA 1986 24B,500 16 204 22 5.0 14 6.3 40 6.1 12 1985 250,m 16 206 22 U 30 6.9 38 5.9 14

-_ ... _------------------------- .. ---------------------------------------------------------- ... ----- ... ----------- .. ---------------------------------- .. -------------------------_ .. _------------------_ ...... _---------I Continued on nell pige. I

SElEC1ED DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO£COIiOHIC CHARACIERISmS BY coum fOR I~05 AHD 1~86 - Continued

SElECtED DEnOGRAPIUC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CIlARACTERISlICS --j-----------------------.. --------- ------------------------------- ... _-- .. -_ .. --------------- ..... _------.. _----- ----------------------------------- ---.. _------------

Honlhly Average l

Publ ic High HaRth! y Aveugm Receiving Population Dee5lty School Dropouts Unuployed Public ilssislince

Population Per Square hi It ---------------- ---------------- --------------------------_ .... _------ ------------------ Percent Percent Percent

cuU/m Year Humber Ranl Dend ty Rank f'ercent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank -------- .. ---- .. ----------

ONONDAGA 1~86 4b3,20a 10 590 13 4.0 31 6.t 39 4.9 10 1985 465,117 10 591 11 J.9 J1 5.2 50 4.9 10

ONIARIO 19D6 92,200 21 143 27 1.5 42 • 6.7 lB 2.8 4b 19B5 92, JBb 27 141 27 J.O 56 1.0 36 2.7 49

ORANGE 1986 281,700 13 HI 17 .4.9 16 5.1 50 M 24 19B5 277,561 13 33b 17 5.1 11 S.l ~a 4.7 20

ORLEANS 1986 18,900 55 99 35 3.2 49 a.s 15 5.5 15 19B5 39,110 55 100 36 3.1 51 10.1 4 5.6 Ib

co OSWEGO H96 l19,bOO 24 125 30 4.B 19 11.5 2 S.I 11 I

.j::> 1985 119,139 24 125 10 6.3 6 0.5 IS 5.1 17

0lSE60 198b 59,200 40 59 51 1.2 51 5.5 4A J.I 39 Iq95 59,3b9 40 59 51 J.4 48 5.5 46 3.0 U

PUIHM 1986 81,600 13 m 16 1.0 54 1.2 62 .4 57 19B5 60,995 34 350 16 1.4 62 1.1 b2 .4 57

QUEENS 1996 1,923,100 2 17,80a 1.1 6.3 41 .0 5B 19B5 1,931,044 2 11,899 8.1 7.0 J5 .0 59

RENSSELAER 1986 151,700 21 232 20 4.1 21 5.1 49 1.6 30 19B5 151,J52 21 231 20 U .9 5.2 49 1.9 29

RICHHOHD 19B6 374,600 II 6,149 5.9 6 5.3 49 .0 58 19B5 m,971 II b,m 7.4 5 5.B 41 .0 58

ROCKLAND 199b 265,900 11 1,519 8 2.B 56 4.1 57 2.5 49 19B5 265,230 H 1,51b B 2.6 60 4.1 58 2.7 50

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... ------~.------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I Continued on ned page. I

SELECIED DEHUGRAI'IIIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERI511C5 BY COUNTY fOR 1905 AND 1906 - Continued

SELECTED DEMOGRAPHIC AHD SOCIOECONDHIC CHARHClERISTlCS ----------_ ...... ----------------------- ------_ ..... _---_ ... _ .. __ .. _------_ ....... --- .. - ------- .. ----- ..... -------------------- ---------------------------------- -----------------

HonlM y Aver agel Publi c Hi gh Honthl y Aver age Receiving

POPUIaIiOD ~en5ity School Dropouts Uneaployed Public Assistance Population Per Squire Hi Ie ---------------- --------- ... ------ -----------------

----_ .......... _-_ ..... _--- ----_ ... _----------- Percent Percent Percent COUNTY 'Iear Huober Rink Density Rank Percent Rank Percent Rink Percent Rank -------------- .. _--------

ST LAWRENCE 1906 112,800 25 41 51 l.l 46 U 14 1.7 198~ IIl,Hl ~5 42 51 1.5 39 8.2 18 7.6

SARATOGA 1986 164,100 20 203 21. J.I 52 5.4 U 1.5 5S 1985 161,590 20 199 23 1.4 47 5.4 47 1.7 55

SCHENECTADY 1986 150,200 22 129 12 J.7 40 4.8 52 3.5 32 1905 150,585 22 7Jl 12 4.1 35 4.5 54 •• 9 21

SCHOHARIE 1986 29,800 58 49 55 3.8 36 7.9 25 1.5 31 19B5 29,199 ~8 48 55 3.4 H 1.9 21 3.6 31

OJ SCHUYLER 1906 17,.00 61 53 53 3.1 53 7.3 30 4.6 21 I 1995 17,511 61 53 53 3.1 54 1.5 28 4.8 19 U"l

SENECA 1986 32, tOO 57 98 17 3.6 U 8.1 18 2.3 51 1985 j2,7D5 57 100 35 3.B 3D 7.9 23 2.2 52

STEUOEN 1986 96,900 26 69 44 3.9 11 7.0 27 6.6 1985 97,3U 26 10 42 3.1 52 7.3 31 6.4 11

SUFfOLK 1986 1,312,000 I,m 3.5 U 4.8 53 l.O 41 1~85 1,313,326 1,440 3.4 U 5.0 51 3.2 40

SULlIVAN 1986 68,600 H 70 4J 5.0 15 5,B U 3.0 40 1985 67,6('2 36 69 44 4.9 18 5.5 45 3.0 4J

TI06A 1986 51,000 47 9B 36 3.2 50 1.1 31 4.5 25 1985 56,379 48 97 17 3.5 40 6.9 39 4.7 22

TOHPI:IHS 1986 87,600 31 184 24 3.7 39 3.5 61 J.B 28 19a5 8B,150 30 105 24 6.0 U 3.1 59 .3.9 28

----------------------------------------------------------------_ ... _---------- ........ --------------------------------.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( Continued on next page. t

OJ I

(J)

SELECTED ~EHOG~A~IIlC AND SOClfiECOIIO"IC CIIARACIERISIICS BY COUNIY FOR 1965 AND 1966

SElECIEO OEHOGRilPllIC ;'ND SOCIOECONOHIC CIfARACIERISIICS ----_ ... -----------------_ .. ------- .. --- -------------... - ... ------------------- ---------------------------_ .... ------ ---- ... ----------------... ------------- -----------------

Hunthly Average l

Public High /tonthl y liver iUe Receiving fopulatioA ~en~ily School Oropout~ Uneaployed Public ~ssJ5tance

Populiltion Per Squ.re Iii I e ---------------- ---------------- -------------_ .. _-------------------- -----.. -- .. ---- .... --- Percent PerCilnl Percent

COUIIIV Year HUDber Rank Oensity Rank Percent Rank Percent Ran~ Percent Rink -~--------- .. -- -_ .. _------

ULSIER 1986 /64,200 19 145 26 6.1 5 4.3 54 l.O U 1995 163,714 19 145 25 5.9 9 •• 1 52 3.2 41

WARREN 1986 55,500 H 63 49 t.B 11 B.I 21 1.9 53 19B5 55,640 H 63 50 5.2 13 1.6 21 2 •• 51

WASHINiilON mb 56.900 U 68 46 5.5 ~.1 44 3.1 38 1995 56,752 41 6Q' 46 5.3 J2 6.4 41 3.3 35

WAYNE 1~86 88.000 JQ 14S 25 M 21 B.1 21 3.4 J3 1985 87.551 J1 H5 26 6.1 7 1.B 25 3.3 . 36

WESTCHESTER 1986 863.200 8 1.971 1 2.7 51 l.8 59 t.6 23 19B5 B65,460 8 1.976 1 1.2. 51 J.l 60 4.4 2l

WVOHING 1986 40.000 .14 69 45 4.0 J2 B.O 23 2.1 52 IqB5 40,616 54 bB 45 l.4 46 0.0 19 I.S 54

YATES 1986 21.200 60 61 50 2.J 59 8.1 19 l.l 36 1985 21,486 60 6J 49 4.2 II 1.5 11 3.2 39

~EN YORK STAlE 1986 11.1)2.100 HA l75 NA 5.B HA 6.J HA 1.1 HA 1985 11.782.754 NA J75 Nil 6.5 Nil 6.5 Nit 1.B ~A

NEW YORK CITY 19B6 7.262,100 NA 24,129 Nil 10.1 NA 1.4 NA 12.6 HA 19B5 7.254.239 HA 24,IO{) Hh 12.1 NA B.1 Nil 12.8 NA

-.------------------------------------ ... _---------------------------------_ ... --.. ----------------------------------------... ---------------------------''''-----------------------_ ... -----------------_ .. ------------I lhe lonthly.average nUlber of persons In public assistance prograas IS not reported by county lor the livf New York City boroughs - unly lor Hew York City 15 j Hhole.

HOlE: PerCfljts pre5ented In thiS Table have been rounded to the "r~t decimal piace, however, the rank Hore5 lor percents Mere calculilted using nuabers with lour 141 declOal pldCfS.

DraJatlc changE~ In rank scores shGuld be interpreted .ith caullon. lhe sensitivity of rates to relatIVely ~ull changes in absolute nuabers increases .s the dze 01 the popultilion decrease~. for exaople. an l.ncreHe of one 111 In 01 given activity 10 01 (ounty Hlth 5,~O~ residents Hill cause the Vollue 01 the rate to increase by ~O. while an Increase of one III in 01 tounty .ilh 50,1100 rtslden!s NIIl cau~e the '1al~e 01 the rate to increase bV Gnly tNO 121.

SOURCE: IfIS Departcent 01 [ouerte, Gepartunt of Education. Depart,ed 01 Labor, Deparllent of Soddl SerVices, and the US Bureau 01 Census.

OJ

• 'l

ImE I INDEI ~liln£ ~ME5 PER 100,ouo fOrulitllON AlID RAIE RAHt:S BY toum fOR 1985 AND 1986

COUNIY

ALBANY

ALLE6ANY

BROHi

BRoonE

CWARAUGUS

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUOUA

CHEHUNG

(HEUP-UGO

CLiNION

COlUHBIA

CORTlAIiD

DELAWARE

YEAR

1986 1965

1986 BaS

19Bb 1985

1986 1985

1986 19a5

198b 1985

1986 !l8S

1986 1985

198b 1993

1986 1905

1986 1965

1986 19a5

1986 1985

IDIAl INOEl C~ IH£5

Rate Rank

4,540.7 10 .,530.6 II

2,060.9 56 2,017.2 58

B,IJI.] l,50b.3

2 3

2,936.5 29 2,984.5 31

2,559.5 35 2,546.0 H

2,JJ2.J 49 2,169.8 55

3,306.5 20 3,314.4 2~

3,922.4 15 4,·JH.8 Il

2,221.8 51 2,8~il.l 35

2,436.9 39 2,694.9 39

2,401.6 4l 2,732.9 3b

4,42e.3 11 4,558.3 ~

2,294.0 2,216.8

50 c· JJ

Tala I

Rih Rank

m.b I~ 309.4 IB

m.b 41 11409 40

2,lIY.9 2,158.2

2 2

16.1 51 62.6 eO

m.2 41 120.5 47

144.1 41 196.2 32

151.5 40 m.l H

201.1 34 181>.1 34

m.o 46 m.o 36

10B.3 19 m.8 II

101.1 20 329.2 11

221.6 30 21U 29

119.6 W.4

48 40

VIOLENT INDEX CRIKES

"urder

Rale Rank

l.S IS 1.7 3D

1.9 J7 3.9 16

l4.3 2B.S

2.3 J2 .9 H

2.3 JJ .0 50

1.2 4A 2.5 28

1.4 14 1.4 42

4.J 14 2.1 34

2.0 35 2.2 32

3.7 19 1.2 H

11.4 5 3.3 21

4.1 15 4.1 14

8.5 2.1

6 3l

forcible Rape

Rate Rink

JI.8 8 21.0 IB

J.9 55 S.B 50

5l.5 69.9

15.9 22 1405 28

7.0 50 2.3 59

12.4 32 16.1 25

IS.4 18 10.9 35

19.2 16 19.2 23

11.9 JJ 36.6 4

7.4 49 11.1 l'

4.9 52 a.1 4S

16.6 19 26.9 9

4.J 54 2.1 M

Robber~ ---------_. RaleRani

10l.1 15 92.5 14

1.0 50 .0 60

1,215.9 1,164.0

J7.l JI 12.1 41

16.2 J5 10.4 49

16.2 36 16.1 36

21.2 30 25.2 23

JJ.I 26 28.8 22

.0 U 10.8 16

6.2 54 14.0 39

24,4 28 22. a 24

37.3 25 2u.l 21

15.0 U

40 54

Ayy. A5uull

R.le Rani

205.B 21 194.2 25

124.1 3B IDS. I 43

m.2 615.5

41. I 60 35.0 60

106.1 45 101.B 42

114.3 42 161.5 28

110.5 43 H.8· 4i>

Total

Rale Rank

4,196.1 10 .,221.2 10

1,921.3 55 1,962.3 51

5,BII.J 5,m.1

2 5

2,859.9 26 2,921.9 26

2,416.4 34 2,425.5 J9

2,168.2 45 1,973.5 55

3,155.0 20 3,182.2 22

15o.s J4 J, m.l II m.5 31 1,856. I Il

119.1 39 2,OBO.S 51 114.1 39 . 2,m.S 15

291.0 II 341.6 8

262.1 15 m.6 10

leU 10 165.5 26

91.9 m.8

41 31

2,128.6 48 2,320.1 4J

2,098.6 50 2,~61.1 41

4,204.6 ~,HI.I

2,174.4 2,~e9.4

H 52

PROPERTY tUDEl CRIHES

Burglary

Rate Rank

1,l9J.S 1 1,111.2 10

721.2 26 624.9 46

I,BOO.5 I,m.l

2 2

463.2 58 519.0 56

566.9 51 m.l 45

4B9.3 56 m.1 59

704.B JO 727.4 11

787.9 24 m.l 21

595.7 4Y 821.J 25

572.2 50 541.9 52

611.0 42 m.1 3J

903. I 18 m.8 19

B17.J 190.2

20 2B

Luceny

Rde Rank

2,829.3 9 2,8e5.9 1

l,m.6 50 l,m.1 54

2,924.3 6 2,552.2 II

2.101.9 18 2,302.5 11

I,m.s 31 1,105.9 37

1,597.9 19 l,m.B 51

2,m.. 16 2,339.6 14

2.022.8 10 2,931.6 5

1,423.6 47 I,HI.B 14

1,518.1 14 1,696. J 39

1,422.4 4B 1,515. a 45

3,218.7 3,213.4

1,100.8 51 1,230.5 56

HV Theil

Rale Rank

174.0 14 118.1 IS

46.5 54 25.3 62

I,OB6.5 m.l

au J2 100.4 32

109.0 2S 8i>.9 36

02.0 35 8S.7 J1

90.7 30 115.2 28

104.6 27 OU J9

69.5 43 n.3 15

lB.2 60 78.9 42

65.2 40 71.7 41

82.9 34 144.8 21

36.3 42.7

61 59

------------------------------------------- .. ---------------------------------- .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. ------------------- .. - .. ------------------------------------( Cunl.llucd on ne,1 paqe. I

. i

co , OJ

IABLE I INOLI CRlnE HAlES PER 100,OOiJ POPULAIION AND kAlE RAN~S BY [OUNIY fOR 1985 AND 1986 - Continued

COUnlY

OUICHES5

ERIE

ESSEX

FRANKLIN

• rUllOH

6ENESEE

6REENE

HAMILTON

HERKIMER

JEFfERSON

KIN6S

LENIS

LlVIHBSTON

YEAR

19B6 1995

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1995

1m ly85

1986 1985

198. 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

,1986 1985

1986 1m

19B6 1985

1986 1985

TOlAl INDEX [RIHES

~41e Rank

3,242.6 24 3,126.4 28

4,591.1 9 4,532.9 10

2,208.11 52 2,m.7 54

2,m.0 47 2,860.2 34

2,950.6 3,435.6

28 20

2,396.. 14 2,559.3 41

2,50B.3 11 2,592.1 39

1,950.3 51 3,271.0 25

1,920.0 59 2,143.9 57

2,345.1 46 2,696.9 31

B,02D.8 7,594.5

3 2

986.4 62 1,llIS.O 62

3,105.1 26 3,684.0 29

Total

Rale Rank

352.9 13 330.6 16

575.3 528.1

16B.8 30 m.6 39

159.1 39 158.9. 38

97.7 91.1

52 53

68.6 59 91. 9 54

159.4 12 36&.6 10

61.6 61 161,8 50

170.0 37 175.9 35

76.3 55 96.5 52

2,251.6 2,~71. 9

63.9 60 123.7 44

269.5 24 210.' 28

VIOLENT IHDEI CRIHES

Hurder

Rale Rank

2.4 30 2.0 J6

4.4 II 4.4 12

.0 52 2.7 24

.0 52 2.6 n

I.B .0

39 50

1.1 41 .0 50

.0 52 2.4 29

.0 52

.0 50

1.5 4J 1.5 41

U 12 3.4 19

21.4 20.5

.0 52 U 15

1.7 39 .0 50

forcible Rape

fide Rank

14.2 25 14.6 27

11.9 14.9

6 6

5.4 51 0.2 44

11.4 36 25.6 II

10.7 S.l

38 52

8.4 47 5.0 53

14.5 24 7.2 t8

.0 59 20.4 21

10.] 39 8.9 39

4.5 53 U 51

56.1 58.8

2 3

.0 59 4.0 55

10.2 40 a.s 41

Rohbtry

Rde Rank

10a.o 12 14.1 16

170.2 166.u

6 8

5.4 56 2.7 59

9.1 U 5.1 53

16.0 12.4

37 42

6.1 52 21.7 25

16.9 Jl 16.9 l5

.0 61 20.4 29

4.4 59 3.0 58

9.0 48 13.5 40

1,218.2 1,221.3

2 2

12.0 41 4.0 55

11.9 42 6.0 51

Agg. Assault

Rate Rank

227.5 10 240.0 17

358.8 312.0

1 9

151.9 31 141.0 30

1lB.6 36 125.6 36

69.] 76.3

52 49

Total

Rate Rank

2,B09.7 25 2,795.9 30

4,016.4 11 4,uOl.8 12

2,039.2 54 2,019.1 54

2,183.9 43 2,761.l 33

2,852.9 l,J4I.6

20 19

51.S 59 2,m.n 17 65.2 51 2,467.4 38

329.0 8 • 2,148.9 16 354.1 7 2,211.5 48

61.6 - 56 61.1 56

153.7 l2. 162.5 27

58.3 57 75.2 56

901.1 771.3

1 3

51.9 58 111.1 40

245.6 17 225.0 20

1,888.7 57 l,175.2 2]

1,750.1 58 1,968.1 5b

2,268.8 40 2,660.5 3£

5,763.1 5,516.6

921.5 62 981.4 62

2,836.2 29 2,BIJ.7 29

PROPERTY INOEl £RI"E5

BurghrV

Rale Rank

855.6 IV m.b 22

11127.6 10 1,150.3 11

165.0 25 136.5 14

609.0 44 IBI.1 29

689.2 1,009.7

32 15

610.4 U 566.3 49

709.1 29 m.1 41

451.1 59 1,302.7 7

520.] 54 536.3 54

711.0 21 8lt.1 23

1,781.0 1,761.8

m.3 60 506.6 57

195.1 62 m.5 60

Lucent

fiate Rank

1,915.8 21 I,OlI.5 32

2,413.0 13 2,448.5 12

1,246.9 56 i,220.2 58

.,509.0 46 1,860.7 30

2,030.4· 25 2,IB4.5 21

1,6£1.3 36 I,B42.6 31

1,360.2 51 1,455.0 49

1,396.0 49 1,710.1 J£

1,1YI.l 57 l,m.B 52

1,509.2 45 1,700.1 39

2,828.2 2,717.8

9 8

m.l 62 430.9 62

2,386.0 14 2,329.9 1£

IIV Theil

Rde Rink

118.l 21 127.7 27

m.B 406.0

21.2 62 £2.5 51

65.9 47 56.4 55

m.2 147.3

21 22

50.2 53 58.5 54

79.6 36 81.3 38

41.1 58 142.5 24

l8.4 59 39.9 61

4l.b 51 65.1 50

1,15l.9 1,036.9

3 3

55.9 51 43.9 58

54,6 52 61. 4 53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. -------- .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( [unllnui!d un nut page. 1

OJ I lD

IA&lE I INDEX CRIME HAlES PER 100,liOO PUPULAIION AND kAlE RANKS BY WUNIY fOR 1905 AND 1906 - Continued

COUNtv

HADISON

"ONROE

HOHT60KERY

NASSAU

NEW YORK

NlA6ARA

ONE lOA

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

OTSE60

VEAR

1986 1965

1986 1905

1986 1905

1m 1985

TOTAL INDEl CRI~ES

Ral~ ~ank

2,410.9 42 2,243.2 52

5,l1O.1 5,31l.7

1,60U 61 1,696.1i 61

J,263.7 21 3,.65.2 19

1986 14,315.6 1965 13,623.0

1986 19B5

1986 1165

1986 1965

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1905

1986 1955

4,112.8 12 .,iOl.7 12

2,m.4 40 2,396.5 '47

4,639.0 4,648.8

2,789.6 12 2,905.3 32

J,723.1 11 3,653.1 16

2,506.1 38 2,367.7 49

2,541.8 36 2,l7l.2 40

2,107.7 54 2,359.9 511

Jolal

Rale Rank

105.8 51 bO. S 59

497.1 465.6

15.2 56 10.9 51

m.2 27 m.l 30

2,690.6 2,657.0

346.9 14 361.9 12

143.5 42 121. 0 46

m.o 11 m.6 19

m.l 29 197.1 31

425.7 0 396.0 9

310.2 10 250.9 25

114.0 50 110.5 49

71.4 57 90.4 51

VIOLENT INDEI CRlnES

"urdu

Rale Rank

I.S 42 1.5 40

6.0 10 4.9 10

1.9 l6 .0 50

2.B 27 2.3 31

29.B 2 25.1 • 2

S.O 11 1.4 41

2.4 31 2.4 30

2.1 Jt 1.4 IB

l.l 24 1.1 46

1.1 21 1.6 11

7.6 1 2.5 21

1.7 40 .0 19

.0 52 3.1 20

forcible Rape

Rate Rank

20.9 14 10.4 16

11.1 27.S

9 8

.0 59 3.B 51

10.2 41 10.1 17

62.2 61.1

16.4 4 23.6 16

11.6 H II.S 31

24.7 10 29.0 7

IS.2 21 20.6 19

21.5 13 20.4 20

12.7 11 25.4 12

IB.4 17 S. t 42

l.l 57 10.0 38

Robbery

Rde Rank

4.S S8 17.9 32

114.0 172.9

7.5 51 15.0 18

m.9 10 111.2 11

I,m.l 1,691.7

106.4 14 91.1 Il

57.0 19 4B.l 19

133.1' 9 130.0 9

29.1' 27 17.1 n

122.2 11 119.6 10

3B.1 21 2~. 3 10

15.1 39 1('.9 45

5.0 57 11.7 H

Aqq. Assaull

Rah Rank

19.0 so lO.7 59

2B5.6 12 260.3 Il

65.8 53 60.1 51

101.2 46 05.9 40

m.l B1I.7

199.1 23 242.2 16

n.l 51 59.1 50

165.3 29 m.l 37

176.6 26 150.1 29

21B.7 11 252.1 It

251.1 16 210.6 22

79,6 49 ~O. t 47

65.0 54 71.4 51

Told

Rale Rank

2,305.1 3D 2,174.0 49

.,012.5

.,9GB.1 5 6

1,519.6 60 1,617.1 61

3,024.5 22 3,249.6 21

11,611.0 10,966.0

3,825.9 12 4,~3B.O 11

2,291.0 19 2,274.7 H

t,m.3 t,m.1

B 8

2,m.. 31 2,700.J 32

1,297.5 17 1,251.1 20

2,196.6 42 2,108.9 51

2,427.1 Jl 2,262.6 4~

2,114.J 49 2,m.5 46

PROPERlV INDEl CRlnES

Burglarr

Rde Rant

m.3 52 595.4 .0

1,142.7 9 1,149.6 12

m.o 53 501.S 58

618.1 II 7~1.1 19

2,m.6 2,219.2

1,064.8 13 1,14~.O II

m.o 31 136.1 J5

1,169.1 1,278.4

8 8

646.8 JB 126.6 3B

978.0 16 1,026.9 14

601.6 45 414.0 61

642.6 19 m.t 50

480.2 51 m.t 47

larceny

&ale Rank

1,682.2 34 I,m.o 46

3,m.1 3,401.0

928.3 61 1,049.9 60

1,841.7 29 2,022.8 24

a,m.1 1,8GB.6

2,554.3 11 2,650.8 9

1,519.1 41 I,m.? 41

2,971.3 2,915.3

5 6

I,B4B.2 2B 1,905.9 27

2,128.1 22 2,O~8.5 22

1,525.4 42 1,608.9 t2

1,670.5 15 1,59~.4 44

1,590.7 J9 1,601.1 4l

HV Iheft

Rale Rank

6B.S 44 OG.4 40

264.8 10 271.5 10

13.l H 65.7 49

490.7 6 522.1 6

1,022.1 910.1

5 5

206.9 II m.1 II

71.9 39 79.1 41

171.3 16 161.5 11

70.4 42 15.6 H

190.1 12 111.8 16

63.6 49 66.G 40

Ill. 9 24 108.9 30

43.4 S6 45. ° 51

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------_ .. ---------------------_ .. -----------------------------------------------.. _---_ .. ----------------------------( Continued un nell p.ye. 1

co I

I-' o

TABLE I IHDEI CRIHE RAlES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND RATE RANKS BY COUNTY fOR 19B5 AND 1986 - Continued

COUHTY

PUIHAH

gUEENS

RENSSELAER

RICHHOHD

ROCKLAND

SI. LAWRENCE

SARAT06A

SCHENECI ADY

SC~OHARIE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

SIEUBEN

SUffOLK

YEAR

1986 1985

198& 1985

196& 1985

1986 1965

1986 1985

198& 19B5

1986 1905

1986 1985

1986 19U5

1986 1985

1986 1905

1986 1905

1986 1985

10TAL IHDEl CRIMES

Rate Rank

2,m.7 48 2,574.1 40

&,909.5 6,53].9

l,92B.i, II 3,706.9 17

5,071.5 5,138.0

2,919.3 30 1,127.1 27

2,992.0 27 2,066.5 13

2,389.9 45 2,287.4 51

3,500.7 19 3,352.9 22

2,188.0 53 2,406.2 46

1,745.0 59 1,729.9 60

1,266.1 22 1,342.6 23

2,59B.2 11 2,505.4 45

1,871.0 16 3,OJ(l.3 15

lolil

Rde R.n~

254.2 25 161.5 11

1,200.5 1,120.4

195.1 22 219.1 20

12l.Y m.2

5 5

209.2 23 265.1 22

117.0 H 84.2 55

111.2 36 m.1 41

214.2 32 190.1 33

110.6 49 72.3 50

39.4 62 70.9 56

m.7 21 272.0 21

233.9 20 m.9 n

250. e 26 m.B 27

VIOLENT INDEl CRIII£5

Hurder

Rile Rank

.0 52 6.2 II

12.1 9.7

2.6 28 2.6 25

1.5 7.0

.0 50 1.5 39

.9 49

.9 4B

.6 51 1.9 J7

1.3 45 2.0 35

.0 52

.0 50

.0 52

.0 50

3.0 25 6.0 7

1.0 48 .0 50

2.9 26 1.1 22

forti~le RApe

Rate Rank

3.7 56 13.6 29

34.4 35.0

5 5

22.3 12 21.6 17

20.1 15 19.6 22

12.0 30 B.3 41

11.4 35 .0 61

13.1 29 B.l 40

9.9 42 13.2 10

3.J 58 1.3 58

.0 59

.0 61

9.1 45 24.2 Il

9.0 46 8.0 46

13.5 28 13.2 11

Robber~

Rolle R.nk

40.7 22 9.9 49

662.B 64B.1

« 4

15.4 17 55.0 18

263.3 261.7

5 5

7S.1 10 60.4 17

7.9 49 10.5 47

16.9 J4 i5.6· 31

89.6 16 75.1 15

6.6 53 .0 60

S.6 55 16.9 14

15.1 18 1.0 57

11.0 H 10.1 31

106.5 13 108.7 12

Agg. Assault

Rile Rank

209.0 20 1l1.9 34

m.3 m.6

195.4 24 m.9 23

m.1 404.1

5 6

200.5 22 195.1 24

117.6 40 12.B 52

110.5 15 169.0 41

114.4 41 99.8 ..

100.7 H 69.0 5]

13.S 61 62.0 55

272.5 14 m.B 18

212.B 19 m.B 19

128.0 31 no. 7 35

Told

Rile Rank

2,OPI.5 52 2,412.6 40

5,101.0 5,405.5

3,631.5 15 3,421.7 17

4,349.6 4,~:,8.B

1 7

2,640.1 30 2,861.8 28

2,054.2' 27 2,182.3 11

2,218.8 41 2,151.3 50

3,286.5 10 3,162.5 24

2,069.4 53 2,JJl.9 42

1,705.6 59 1,651.0 59

2,961.0 24 3,(170.6 25

2,164.3 35 2,249.5 47

1,620.9 16 3,554.5 14

PROPERlY INDEX CRI~ES

Surghrv

Rate Rank

663.8 16 m.B 21

1,441.9 1,421.8

4 5

1,084.3 II 982.3 16

1.051.2 H 1,218.2 9

m.w 28 159.6 32

62B.2 40 m.6 41

600.1 41 619.1 44

1,078.5 12 953.7 17

1126.. Ii 881.0 20

669.9 14 . 546.6 51

660.0 31 101.2 40

597.3 48 540.8 53

998.3 15 m.l 18

Larceny

Rate Rank

1,272.1 54 I,m.l 49

2,814.1 7 2,641.0 10

2,311.2 15 2,251.5 19

1,970.6 26 1,898.5 29

1,780.4 10 1,902.6 28

2,150.5 21 2,OIl.9 25

1,544.8 U .,424.8 50

2,057.2 24 2,042.9 23

I,m.l 50 1,390.5 53

m.2 60 1,048.1 61

2,IB2.? I? 2,221.3 20

1,666.5 17 1,61b.4 40

2,JIJ.' 17 2,329.1 15

/IV Ihell

RAte Rank

145.6 19 166.4 18

1,418.8 1,342.7

171.0 \3 192.0 13

1,327.8 1,292.1

:1 2

145.7 18 m.6 12

75.5 38 12.S 46

71.7 40 81.4 35

150.8 11 165.9 19

56.0 50 62.5 52

67.5 45 56.1 56

124.1 22 118.1 21

100.4 28 92.3 33

109.2 9 279.0 9

------------------------------------------:------------- .. _--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I CUIIIJn"~d 011 lied pag~. I

O::l I ...... ......

MLE I IIIDE! (kinE RAIES PER 100,OVO PUfULAllDH AND RAIE RANKS BY (DUNIY fOR I~B5 AHD 1986

CDUNII YEAR

SULLI VAN 1986

IIOGA

IOMPKINS

ULSIER

WARREN

WA5HlHGJOH

HAYNE

WESICHESIER

WYOHIHG

1995

1986 1985

1986 1965

1966 1965

1986 19B5

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1995

1986 HaS

Y~IES 1986 1965

HEW YORK STATE 1986

NEW YORK C IlY

198~

1,966 )9US

TOlhL INu£l CRIHES

R~le Rank

3.540.1 18 1,784.5 16

1,698.0 60 1,764.0 S9

5,OOLil 5,126.4

2,859.2 JI 3,019.0 30

J,270.7 21 J,4Q8.9 21

2,129.1 55 2,158.2 5~

J,18B.I 3,132.5

25 26

',014.6 13 3,811.0 14

2,565.0 14 2,5b2.l 41

2,418.1 4J 2,S6~.5 42

5,741.6 NA S,Sbo.l N~

8,866.7 NA 8,392."9 IIA

Tohl

Rde R~nk

412.5 10 319.9 14

191.2 J5 122.2 4~

m.1 45 m.J 41

m.o II m.5 13

64.1 59 50.3 61

210.1 J3 259.6 21

216.6 260.1

31 21

m.9 16 m.l 15

422.6 m.1

8J.S 5J 46.4 62

983.9 HA 928.6 Hh

1,997.5 HA I,SSl.' NA

VIOLENT IHDH [RIUES

Hurder

Rate Rank

1.4 9 1.0 21

J.9 16 .0 50

1.1 H 1.1 .~

J.l 20 1.3 IJ

1.8 31 .0 50

.0 52 5.1 8

J.4 .0

22 50

1.5 21 4.7 II

2.5 29 4.9 Y

.0 52

.0 5~

10.7 HA Y.5 Nil

21.0 HA 19.3 HA

forcible Rape

hte Rant

32.6 n.1 10

n.D 21 3.9 56

9.1 H 11.3 n

16.6 20 23.9;' 14

10.8 11 1.2 49

16.0 21 5.1 51

22.1 21.8

II IS

14.0 26 15.1 n

7.4 49 1.4 41

9.3 4J 18.6 24

10.4 HA JI.9 HA

49.3 NA 54.0 "Nit

Robbery

Rate Rar,k

54.9 . 20 41.0 20

II.S 43 1.9 56

jl.~ 24 21.6 26

4S.S 21 16.2 21

21.6 '29 12.6 41

10.1 45 5.1 52

17.0 20.4

32 28

165.2" 8 111.1 6

2.5 60 1.4 50

9.1 46 '.0 6(,

514. 2 ~~

504.1 HA

1.127.2 HA 1,IOS.2 N,l

A99. A£saull

Rde R.nk

m.6 9 267.1 t2

167.6 28 114.l 18

89.1 48 95. 1 45

107.1 10 28B.1 II

3D.6 62 10.S 61

181.4 25 24U 15

17l.5 116.S

27 21

151.2 31 m.B 32

410.1 SIl ••

65.0 55 21.8 62

428.6 NA 33l.O NA

198.9 Nit 101. 9 Hit

Jotil

Raie hnk

3.1lS.6 21 J.4I1.6 16

1.500.8 61 1,6U.8 60

4.868.5 ·6 S,m.l 2

2.48l.2 32 2,666.5 J4

3,206.0 19 l,15B.6 18

1,919.1 56 I,BY8.7 58

2.911.5 2,811.8

23 21

3.619.1 14 3,50&.1 15

2.142.4 47 2,029.0 53

2,Jl4.5 36 2,m.1 31

',m.l NA ',b38.1 Hil

6.B69.3 NA 6,~09.5 Hit

PROPERTY INDEX CRIHES

Burghrr

Rale Rank

',396.4 5 1,650.3 ,

124.0 61 m.b 62

',221.£ 6 l,lU.1 6

665.6 35 766.8 31

909.B 17 830.2 2'

503.B 55 535.1 55

m,l 162.0

21 30

196.1 2J OII.S 26

m.5 22 682.9 42

601.4 46 m.9 J6

1,216.3 HA l,m.J Hit

1,735.4 Hit 1,112.9 HA

Larceny

Rate Rank

I,m.b 40 1,614.1 41

ye6.1 59 1,1lI.l 5Y

J.546.6 2 ',126.6 2

1,110.9 J2 l,l.U Jl

2,152.3 20 2,363.0 13

l.l29.8 52 1,274.7 55

2.015.5 1,98S.6

21 2b

2.445.5 12 2,193.1 18

1,267.8 55 ',215.6 !l7

i,U4.S J3 1,139.5 J5

2,906.2 HA 2,80B.9 Hit

J,m.o UA 3,661.0 Nil

MY H,ell

Ralt Rank

m.6 15 179.6 U

90.7 JI 78.S 4J

H.l 29 m.] 26

106.1 26 m.1 25

m.B 20 165.] 20

85.5 JJ 8S.9 H

66.9 104.1

m.5 399.1

46 31

B 8

76.2 37 116.5 29

46.4 55 41.1 60

615.2 HA S98.0 UA

1,195.Y MA I,H15.6 Hit

-------------------------------- .. --_ .... ------------------------------------------------------------.. ----------------------------.. -------------------------------------------------------- .. ---------------------- .. -1101E: Dra.allc changes In rank SCOrfS should be inl~rpreted .ith caullon. The £ensitivity 01 rates to relatively siall changes in absolule nuabers intruses as the sile 01 the populalion .~ecruse£.

for exa.ple, an 'increase 01 one III In a given ACtiVIty in a county _itb 5,000 residepts Hili [au~e the .... Iue 01 the rate to Increase by 20, .hile an incruse Dione III In a county .Ith ~O,6~O r.sldents "Ill CaUse the value 01 the rale to increase by only 1.0 121.

Source: HY5 61'1151011 01 Cruinal Juslice Services, Ulli/ora Cri •• Reporting 5y£I.I.

Tr,BLE 2~ fELONY AND HISDEHEHlIOfi AOUll ARRESI RAlES PER 100,000 r'O~UlAIION AN& RAlE RAtII:S BY tuum fOR !9/",,, i.~D .906

fElONY ARmIS IOlilL ------------------ ------ .. - .. ---------------- ------------- HISDEHEAHOR

ARRESTS TDtd Violent Olher GR~ESTS

------------- .. -- .. _------- ------------- ------------ ---_ .. _-------COUNlY YEAR Rale Rank Rde Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank --- --_ .. _ ... -----

ALBANY 1906 2,m.l 12 112.1 251.~ 460.5 1 1,626.7 21 1905 2,197.9 14 604.5 194.8 409.1 6 1,593 •• 2!J

AU6ANY 1986 1,247.5 60 130.1 56 65.1 51 265.1 46 m.o 58 1985 1,111.9 62 231.0 62 S5.0 50 m.o 62 OBO.1 60

BROHI 19B6 3,611.0 2 2,065.8 2 821.0 2 1,244.0 2 1,5U.2 28 19B5 3,2BI.8 2 1,715.9 2 170.1 2 1,005.4 .2 1,509.0 29

BROOME 19B6 i,m.5 31 m.5 35 1I~.1 28 283.2 40 1,445.0 36 1985 l,m.2 39 J88.3 ~9 109.2 27 219.1 29 1,287.9 39

co tA TTARAUGUS 1986 1,756.2 41 m.5. 55 . 72.1 55 261.8 48 1,419.1 lB I 19B5 1,531.9 44 288.3 56 66.0 52 221.5 56 1,299.6 31

I-' N

CAVUGA 1986 1,558.2 5~ m.2 41 86.4 16 291.9 31 1,IB4.0 51 1985 1,843.1 34 313.2 32 61.4 tl 291.B· 23 I,HO.I 31

CHAUTAUQUA 1996 1,801.8 39 145.2 50 06.0 41 m.l 50 1,462.6 34 19B5 1,660.5 41 299.5 55 ( 71.0 45 222.6 53 1,3&1.0 35

CHEHUNG 1986 1,905.0 34 426.5 28 m.l 21 297.2 Jl 1,470.5 II 1985 I,HJ.6 29 451.1 21 1~4.4 32 m.s 15 1,492.5 29

WEHANGO 1986 1,966.0 29 290.0 60 58.0 60 222.0 60 1,686.0 18 19S5 2,ISU 16 110.2 • 51 92.1 37 ~IB.2 57 1,819.4 10

CLINTON 1986 1,943.1 JI 507.4 19 126.8 22 380.5 12 l,m.O 31 1985 I,S51.1 33 184.~ 30 95.6 H 2B9.1 26 1,466.2 12

COLUMBIA 19B6 2,019.8 24 466.2 22 141.7 19 324.5 25 1,5SJ.5 26 1985 2,214.2 11 m.1 12 132.0 19 391.1 1,111.2 12

CORTLAND 1986 2,865.0 5 51U 11 177.2 11 m.b 23 2,350.2 1985 2,964.6 4 10l.0 25 111.8 o· .0 291.2 25 2,561.6 2

DELAWARE 1986 2,010.6 25 420.4 29 BO.l 51 m.l 22 1,590.2 24 1985 1,960.0 21 m.2 10 bl.8 55 m.1 28 1,610.8 17

----------------------_ .. _-----------------------------------------------------------------':'------------------------------------

( Continued on next pa9~. I

TA~lE 2. FElONY AHO HISDEHEANOR AOULl ARREST RATES PER 106,006 POPULATION AND MIE RANKS BY COUNTY FOR 1985 AND 19B6 - Continued

mONY ARRESTS TOTAL ------------ ... - ... --- ... - ... -- .... ----------_ ... _-_ .. _- ------- ... ----- HISDEHEANOR

ARRESTS Tot ill Yiolent Other ARRESTS ---_ ... ----_ .. _- .. -- ... --.. - .. ---- ... ------------ -----------_ .. -------------

COUNTY YEAR Rate Rink Rde Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank --_ .. ----------

DUTCHESS 1986 1,907.1 27 531.4 16 158.1 11 m.l 13 1,449.8 15 1985 1,989.B 23 514.7 13 166.6 12 348.1 It 1,415.1 30

ERIE 1986 2,257.1 11 571.3 12 222. J m.9 19 1,685.0 19 1985 2,IOl.1 19 539.1 10 210.2 319.5 19 1,563.1 25

ESSEX 1986 2,2BJ.7 16 584.0 11 93.7 40 490.4 l,m.l 17 1m 1,949.7 28 354.7 15 66.7 50 296.0 27 1,595.0 19

fRANKLIN 1986 2,347.0 11 m.b 49 93.6 41 258.0 51 1,995.4 8 1985 2,016.3 20 341.1 37 75.4 41 271.7 32 1,669.2 14

CD fULlON 1986 I,m.s 51 267.4 61 60.4 58 207.0 62 1,126.4 52 • t-'

w 1985 1,395.0 55 341.7 39 75.8 46 268.9 Jl 1,050.3 52

GENESEE 1986 1,932.0 33 386.1 3B 107.1 35 278.9 4J 1,545.9 21 1985 1,757.7 35 m.s 41 04.1 42 m.8 48 1,429.2 34

GREENE 1986 2,141.l 23 551.1 It 121.1 H 429.9 9 1,596.2 22 1985 1,675.7 40 m.3 23 126.6 22 30U 21 1,251.3 U

HAnlLTOH 1986 1,680.0 45 320.0 58 60.0 59 260.0 49 1.160.0 40 19B5 -2,006.0 22 4BI.4 17 60.2 56 421.3 5 1,524.6 26

HERKIHER 19S6 1,.09.6 S6 366.2 H 86.7 45 279.5 42 1,041.3 55 1~8~ l,l86.8 56 272.0 59 64.3 54 207.7 60 1,114.0 50

JEffERSON 1986 1,496.1 54 452.5 25 112.6 30 HO.O 21 1,044.2 54 1985 I,HO.~ 54 m.l l4 103.9 :n 266.4 35 1,070.2 51

KINGS 1986 2,837.5 6 1,597.3 1 770.4 3 826.9 i ,240.2 46 1985 2,405.5 8 1,377 .1 3 m.s 3 m.2 1,027.8 54

lENIS 1986 865.6 62 260.9 62 27.7 62 2ll.2 59 604.1 62 1985 1,132.5 61 254.3 61 27.S 62 224.5 51 81B.2 61

LIVINGSTON 1986 2,551.2 m.1 40 81.9 49 295.2 14 2,174.1 1 1985 2,590.5 28B.o 51 7l.7 49 211.3 59 2,m.5 6

------------------------------------- .. _------------------------_ ... _---------------------------------- ... ----'"'-----------------------

( Continued on ned page. I

IABLE 2A fElONY ArID HISDErtEAIIOR ADULT ARREST HAlES PER 100,000 POPULATION AHD RATE RANKS 8Y COUHT'I fOR 1985 AND 1986 - Continued

fELOIlY ARRESIS TOTAL ------- .. _--------- -----------.-------------- ------------- UISDEHEANOR

ARRESTS lolal Yiol ent Other ARRESIS ------------- ----------_ .. - --_ .. _-------- --------.. --- -- .. - ... _-------

COUHIY YEAR R~le R~nk Rile Rank Rale R~nk R~te Rank Rale Rank --------------

HADISON 1986 1,846.8 36 36".4 n 111.1 31 255.3 52 1,480.5 32 1985 1,654.1 42 m.6 49 n.t 49 244.2 47 l,m.5 3£

~ON~DE 1986 2,285.5 15 555.4 13 196.0 11 m.4 11 1,730.1 16 1985 2,il59.5 19 485.1 15 118.5 11 306.9 20 1,514.2 21

HONT6DHERY 1986 2,191.7 21 m.8 39 16.B 53 309.0 28 I,BII.' 15 !9B5 I,B15.2 31 302.1 54 45.7 60 257.0 lD 1,572.5 24

NASSAU 1996 1,305.4 59 402.0 Jl 121.1 25 281.0 41 m.4 59 19B5 l,llt.8 51 m.' 31 121.1 21 253.4 41 940.4 S8

co NEW 'YORK 1986 1,69~.0 2,820.4 981.B 1,838.6 4,m.l I ..... i~5 1,111.1 2,517 .6 m.B 1,593.8 ',599.5 +=>

NIAGARA 1986 2,003.7 26 463.8 23 164.1 14 299.7 12 i,53M 30 1985 I,B56.' 32 m.o 22 152.9 14 212.1 11 l,nt.5 II

ONEIDA 1986 1,427.0 55 m.o ~4 103.0 3b m.6 58 I,OS1.J 51 1m 1,289.0 59 m.l· 4S 106.5 29 m.8 S8 966.S 56

ONONDAGA 1986 , ,81b.3 38 586.4 10 223.9 B 362.5 15 1,22?9 41 1965 1,756.2 36 591.7 7 221.4 7 365.] 11 1,lbl.5 48

ONTARIO 1966 2,287.4 14 m.l 36 102.0 37 m;B l6 1,893.1 ¥ 19B5 1,91B.7 26 m.7 41 85.5 41 252.2 41 1,640.9 16

ORAN6t 1986 2,412.8 10 616.1 203.1 10 m.1 8 1,83b.7 12 1965 2,195.5 15 511.2 181. 2 10 m.9 8 1,618.4 IB

ORLEANS 1986 1,640.1 49 452.4 26 159.4 16 293.1 J5 1,187.7 50 1995 1,521.B 50 402.9 16 140.5 1B m.' 16 1,015.0 5l

OSWEGO 19B6 1,721.6 n J40.3 51 92.0 42 24B.3 55 1,381.3 39 19B5 1,~56. 2 H m.7 42 9&.1 39 245.1 46 1,220.4 46

OTSEGO 1986 2,174.0 22 351.7 48 54.1 61 300.7 ]0 I,B19.1 Il 19B5 2,l43.0 9 370.6 3l 119.6 2] 251.0 H 1,912.4 1

----------------- .. _----------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------~-------------------------( Continued un ned page. I

TA&LE 2A mOHY AND hlSDEHEANOR ADULT ARREST RATES PER 100,000 POPULATION AHD RAIE RANKS BY COUNIY FOR 1985 AND 1986' - Continued

FElOlIY BRRES IS IOIAl - ... _ .. _---- .. _-- .. _--- --.. ---------------------- ----------.. -- H1SDEHEBNOR

.RRESIS Tali I Violent Other ARRESTS --------- .. _-- .. - .. ---.. _----- ----_ ... _------ ------------- -----.... _-----

[DUNl'I YEAR Rdte Rank Rate Rank Rde Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank -----j--------

PUTNAn 1986 1,970.6 28 409.1 30 109.1 34 JOO.2 31 1,5£1.3 25 1985 1,567.5 46 m.l ~s 66.8 53 259.6 J1 1,241.1 44

QUEENS 190. 1,66£.7 46 916.2 4 JIU 551.4 ~ 140.5 61 1985 1,451.9 52 109.9 S 10a.9 401.0 1 144.0 62'

RENSSELAER 1m 1,655.9 .7 357.9 47 116.0 27 2~1. 9 57 1,298.0 4J 1985 1,568.5 45 m.7 46' 118.9 24 2CJ6.B 61 1,242.8 4l

RICHHOHD 1m 1,563:5 ~o 610.5 e 29\.B 6 m.7 24 m.o 56 I~B5 1,501.3 51 m.l 9 295.8 5 274.4 lli m.o 59

OJ RDC~LAND 198. I,m.b AI J68.9 42 • BI.2 50 2B1.7 19 168.7 60 I 1985 1,291.1 59 m.l 3U 93.5 J6 252.2 42 949.0 51 ......

U1

51. LAWRENCE 1986 2,212.8 20 m.o 57 15.4 54 m.4 53 I,OSJ.O 10 1995 2,OCJ6.9 21 124.5 H 11.6 .4 246.9 ~5 1,682.4 \J

SARATOGA 1986 2,212 •• 18 405.2 31 91 •• H m.B 27 1,817.2 14 1985 2,2B6.0 10 m.l 28 ,105.8 JO 291.5 24 1,800.1 9

SCHENECTADY 1986 .I,W.7 42 400.1 34 91.9 43 10D.J 29 l,m.b 42 1995 1,529.1 49 m.o Jb 94.3 J5 255.7 40 1,118.1 41

SCHOHARIE 1986 2,110.1 a 413.2 20 110.7 32 362.4 16 2,245.0 6 1985 2,23B.3 12 10B.l 52 8U 40 221.5 55 1,929.6 8

SCHUYLER 1986 1,902.J 35 362.1 46 109.2 JJ 252.9 54 1,540.2 2¥ 1985 I, 9JO. 2 30 4\6.9 24 HB.5 16 269.4 34 I,SIl.l 21

SENECA 1986 2,311.8 Il 470.4 21 96.6 J8 m.B It 1,841.4 II 1985 2,219.9 1\ 451.8 19 91. 6 38 366.2 10 1,822.1 II

STEUBEN 1986 1,559.3 51 HI.6 52 69.1 56 272.4 44 1,211.8 48 1985 1,447.5 5J J04.1 53 67.8 51 236.3 49 1,i4l.4 49

SUFFOLK 1986 1,641.5 48 m.l 32 116.7 20 266.5 45 1,244.2 45 1985 1,607.5 39 m.8 26 141.9 11 257.0 39 1,2B8.7 38

-----------_.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I Continued on next p.ge. I

TriblE 2A FELUNY AND HI50EHfAHUR ADULT ARRESI RAIES PER 100,000 ~UPULAIJOH MID RATE RANI:S bY mUNIY fOR IYB5 AND 1986

mONY ARP.ESIS 1OI,1L ------------_ .. _ ... - ... - ... --- .. ------------------- ------------- HI5DEHEMIDR

ARRESIS lolal VlOlenl Olher ARRESIS ------------- ... ------------ ------------- ------------- -------------

coulm YEAR Rde Rank Rile Rank Rale Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank ----_ ... _-------

SULLIVAN 1986 3,182.2 4 915.7 35a.6 5 567. I l,256.6 5 1985 J, 1U2.0 1 751.5 m.4 I> 457. I 2,350.5 5

TIOGA 1986 1\711.8 H 302.7 45 70..4 52 20U 39 1,149.0 U 1985 1,534.4 48 28:;.8 58 4Y.b 59 234.2 50 1,250.:1 42

TOMPKINS 1986 l,m.1 32 lU.6 SI 95.9 39 241.7 56 1,592.5 23 1m 1,98a.7 24 m.o 4l IOU 28 m.l 54 1,659.7 15

ULSIER 1986 2,221. I 19 m.3 15 159.6 15 lOU II 1,671.1 20 1~85 2,1Il.9 17 523.9 II 160.0 13 363.9 12 1,590.0 21

WARREN 1986 3,282.9 590.4 109.2 12 407.2 10 2,686.5 2 1995 2,HP 5 m.1 18 110.6 25 m.5 IJ 2,471.2 3

o:l I "ASHIHSIOH 1986 1,95906 30 441.1 21 117.8 26 m.4 21> 1,518.5 31

l-' 1985 1,9aO.5 ,< 3'i8.2 27 I1l5.7 31 292.5 22 1,582.3 22 (J) ,"

WAYNE 1986 2,817.0 458.0 24 113.6 29 m.l 20 2,359.1 1905 2,870.3 45b.9 20 123.4 20 m.5 18 2,421.4

WESTCHESIER 1986 1,794.5 40 511.0 18 154.1 18 358.3 18 1,281.5 44 19a~ 1,730.9 31 490.0 14 150.3 15 340.5 11 1,240.0 ~5

NYOnING 1986 1,502.5 53 291.1 59 93.3 49 208.3 61 1,210.8 49 198~ 1,598.0 43 m.1 5u S~.5 51 260.6 36 1,280.9 40

YAIES 1996 I,JJO.2 58 30U 31 122.6 2l 261.2 47 941.4 57 1985 1,265.9 60 200.6 ~Q 31.2 6J 223.4 52 1,005.3 55

HEN YORr. STATE 1986 2,566.3 NA 968.7 NA 369.9 UA 598.8 NA 1,597.6 HA 1985 2,371.0 HA 8~O.1 1111 338.3 IIA 512.4 UA 1,520.3 JlR

NEW YORY. CITY 1986 3,519.8 UA 1,697.1 NA m.1 HA 1,001.3 HA I,B82.4 HA l~a5 3,212.5 tl~ . 1,457.9 IIR 026.1 NA 831.8 NA 1,151.6 IIR

-------_ ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... _---UOI£: Oraadllc change~ in rank ~cores should be inlerprfled Kllh caul ion. The senslll',ily of rates 10 relallvely slall

changes in dbsolule nu.bers increases as ,lhe slle 01 the population decreases. For erample, an increase 01 one (II in i

given acllvllv In a (oullly .ith 5,000 residenls Kill cause Ihe value 01 the ral~ 10 Increase by 20, .hile an increase 01 one (II in a counly Nllh 50,000 rfsident~ Kill cause Ihe value 01 the rate lo Increase by only tMO m.

SOUP-CE: NYS Ol'ilslon of CriQlnal Jusllce Services, Arre~ls and PrOteSslng Irends file.

1A6U 2[ ADULT ARREST RAIES PER 100,000 POfULAI JON AND RAIE fiANI:S fOR SELWEO OfFENSES BY [OurlTY fOR 1905 hllD 1986 •

HURDER fORe I OLE hAPE ROB~EkY A6G. ASSAUlT 6UR6L~RY LARCEHY" ARRESIS ARRESIS ARRESlS ARRESIS ARRESTS ARRESTS

... -_ .. _--.... --_ .. ------------- ------------- -- .. - .. _------- - .. _---- .. ----- ----- .. -------roum Year Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank --------------

ALBANY 1986 5.6 9 12.1 II 31.1 U 112.2 7 1f4.7 12 m.2 12 1985 2.8 23 6.7 22 28.5 14 86.6 9 99.3 28 397.4 16

ALLEGANY 1986 .0 16 2.0 56 .0 59 23.S 51 146.5 V 151.5 61 1985 7.9 4 .0 56 .0 56 31.1 10 68.0 48 196.5 57'

BRONI 1986 23.6 21.6 I 269.8 319.5 2 189.0. J m.B 10 19B5 19.0 26.~ 2 23U lfI.2 2 100.6 3 413.2 11

J BROOME 1906 2.1 21 8.5 22 1t.7 23 33.2 35 78.3 15 412.2 17

1985 2. B 12 ~.2 30 11.3 26 10.1 42 Ob.! 37 354.9 25

CAll ARAU6US 19B6 7.0 5 5.9 35 4.7 49 19.'/ 56 84.1 38 261.1 48

0: 1985 .0 49 2.3 H 8.2 34 32.8 37 82.0 39 243.7 50 I ...... CAYUGA 19B6 I.l 40 B.B 21 6.3 42 22.S 54 91.4 31 m.o 27 .......

1 )85 3.B 16 1.5 19 10.0 29 37.6 30 51.l 59 m.8 '/

CHAUTAUQUA 19B6 1.1 lB 4.9 4J 7.7 ·lD 32.1 39 95.1 28 346.6 JI 19B5 .1 48 2.8 42 14.6 22 22. '/ 50 BI.I 41 344.6 28

[HEMUNS 1986 '1.1 . 12 6.6 31 22.1 18 43.1 21 99.4 21 616.5 2 1985 1.1 45 4.3 35 6.5 41 31.7 35 Ill.7 9 641.1 2

CHENANGO 1m 2.0 21 .0 59 .0 5'/ 12.0 60 64.0 53 118.0 35 1985 2.0 32 10.0 H ••• 0 47 IB.O 57 1Il0.1 lB' 354.3 26

CLINTON 1986 6.2 6 1.9 41 7.4 39 51.2 18 ·110,0 Il 402.1 21 I ~B5 .0 49 1.2 54 9.:0 31 31.9 39 6U 46 m.1 n

COLUMBIA 1986 1.6 11 .0 5'/ 13.2 26 81.0 10 84.0 40 J01.I 3B J9fi5 6.6 1.7 52 9.9 30 62.1 11 m.3 8 349.2 21

--------------------------- .. - ... ---------------------------------------------------.. -- .. _------ .. ---------_ .... --------------------------------------------- .. ---------------------------------------------------------( Continued un ne~t page. I

WlE 2C ~&Ulf AkhESI kAlES PER 100,000 POPUlAIiON AIIO RAIE RAIIt:S fOR SElECTED OFFENSES BY C@NJY fOk 1985 AlID 1906 I - Cunllnued

HURDER FORe 1 alE RAPE R09~ERY A6S. ASSAULT &Uil6lARY lARCEIIYII ARRESTS ARR£STS ARRESTS ARRESTS AfiRESTS ARRESTS

- ... ----------- ------------- ----_ .. -- .. - .. _- ----------.. -- - ... ----_ ... _---- -------------CGUNIY Year Rale RJn~ Rale R.n~ Rile Rdnt fide Rant Rale Rln~ Rate Rank ------------_ ..

CORTLAND 1986 4.2 IJ B.4 21 33.8 12 H.1 26 14l.5 10 540.1 6 1985 .11 49 4.2 37 8.4 11 4'8.5 21 107.6 19 m.9 7

DELAWARC 1986 .0 46 12.7 9 9.5 J6 29.7 H 89.2 II J88.5 25 1765 2.1 31 .0 56 2.1 54 46.9 'c .J I1l8.8 17 18l.9 19

DUTCHESS 1986 J.5 15 5. B 36 21.8 20 67.8 14 95.0 27 m .• 24 I'IJ5 1.6 jJ 5.5 29 2b.7 16 16.4 II 96.1 31 365.7 21

ERIE 1986 3.S 14 IU 42.3 9 92 •• 104. 3 16 411.6 1985 1.9 15 14.8 42.7 , 8 91.3 100.0 26 439.9

OJ ESSEX 1986 .0 46 13.8 5.5 46 41.1 29 170.B J66.4 . 29

I 1965 .0 • 49 2.8 41 .~ ...... 56 21.5 45 112.7 15 286.0 H (Xl

FRANKlIH 1986 .0 46 6.8 10 9.1 14 27.4 46 89.0 14 299.1 40 1985 2.1 20 9.1 16 .0 56 25.1 4B 100.5 25 294.6 39

FULTON 1986 1.8 33 3.7 50 5.5 47 25.6 50 51.3 59 m.o 4J 1985 .0 49 .0 56 5.4 II 21.5 -19 90.2 35 114.0 34

GEIIESEE 1986 .0 46 5.1 40 3 •• 54 28.9 45 96.9 25 m.b 41 1985 .0 49 5. I 32 21.0 17 21.1 ;6 9l. I 31 213.7 51

GREENE 1986 .0 46 9.5 17 7.1 40 64.1 17 59.4 55 lll.5 37 IV< .0" 2.4 t7 2.4 46 7.2 36 ,4.4 10 65.1 51 :18~. 9 40

HMILION 198b .0 46 .0 59 .0 59 .0 62 160.0 320.0 34 1995 .0 49 .~ 5b .0 c·

JO .11 6~ 220.7 200.6 55

fiERY. I nER 198b .0 46 4.5 45 4.5 50 31.4 40 80.1 tl 219.7 52 1985 .0 H 1.0 ;1 4.5 45 22.4 54 53.a 50 215.2 52

... -- .. ,.. .. --------~--------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ .. ------------------ .. -... _-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( Conlinued on neKl page. I

IHBLE 2C AbULI IlhHESI ~AIES fER IOO,liOo Pof'ULATIDN AND RATE RANI:S fOR SElECTED OffENSES S't COUNTY fOR 1985 AND 1906 I - Continued

HURHR fOfiCI&lE RAPE ROB&ERY ASS, ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCEN'iII ARkESTS AhRESlS A~RESlS A~RESTS ARRESTS I!~RESJS

--.. -.. -------- ---_ .. _------- .. _-_ .. _------- ---".. ... _------- ------------- ----... --------COUNTY Y~ar Rale Rank R.te R.nk Rile Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Ran~

.. -----_ .. "'-----

JEffERSON 1986 5.5 10 5.5 lB 3.1 55 35.1 36 146.8 8 210.8 55 1985 2.3 29 2.3 49 10.2 28 3B.4 29 117.4 13 1BB.5 58

KINGS 19B6 17.3 18.2 295.4 27B.4 J 117.5 m.o 22 1985 16.1 21.8 249.0 240.6 1 156.S 5 m.8 29

LEWIS 1986 .0 46 4.0 48 4.0 52 M 61 JU 62 110.7 62 1'i.i5 .0 49 .0 56 4.0 48 U 60 63.4 38 151.0 62

LIVINGSTON 1986 J.' 16 1.' 52 5.1 48 46.1 25 68.3 50 m.l 18 1~85 6.9 7 1.7 51 6.9 3B 42.9 27 54.9 57 m.9 II

co MADISON 1986 t.5 12 11.5 6.0 H 19.0 32 84.1 39 m.J 32 I 1985 1.5 3B 6.0 26 9.0 32 3,0 61 09.9 36 317.6 32

I--' lD

HOUR DE 1986 6.1 7 Il. B 6 47.0 4B.2 24 101.~ 19 550.2 5 1985 4.0 IJ 12.2 10 41.7 4 lob 26 107.5 20 502,8 5

MONTGOMERY 1m 1.9 31 1.9 57 5.B 45 30.7. 41 ~1.6 ~1 268.1 46 1985 1.9 34 5.7 28 1.9 55 22.8 51 60.9 53 m.B ~3

NASSAU 1986 2.0 26 2.6 54 ll.J IJ 49.4 22 53.6 58 256.5 50 1~85 3.0 21 2.5 H 30.3 12 47.3 23 59.9 55 255.7 46

NEW YORK 19B6 18.9 2 20.4 m.o J69.1 210.' 1,1lI .• 1985 17.9 2 24.3 406.1 346.9 176.2 1,010.5

NIAGARA 1986 1.8 32 10.6 13 25.4 11 65; 9 16 103.7 17 391.4 2J 1985 2.8 25 5.1 31 26.B 15 63.3 16 109.5 16 356.6 24

ONEIDA 1986 2.4 23 8.0 24 !1.l 22 30.6 42 8B.5 35 m.o 13 19B5 1.2 41 6.0 27 11.6 25 32.1 38 93.3 32 250.0 45

-------.. "" .. _ .. --------_ .. ------------------------ ...... -------- ... _--------------------------------------_.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( Cnntinued on netL pige. I

lA~LE ~C ADULT A~R[SI k.nES PER 1(10,000 POf'ULAIlON ArlO RATE RANf:S fOR SELECTED OfFEHSES BY COUNTY FOR 1905 AIID 1906 I - Continued

IIURDER fORCIBLE RAPE ROBBERV AG6. ASSAULT BUP.6LARY LAP-CEIl'IIi ,1RRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS hRRE5TS ARRESTS hRRESTS

------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------- .. -- ---------... ---[OUW Year Rale Rank Rale Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank Rde Rank Rate Rank .. ~--. -----_ .... -

ONONDAGA 1986 2.6 22 D.9 20 49.4 81.8 11 106.4 15 424.9 19 1985 3.0 20 14.0 8 48.1 76.1 12 137.5 6 300.1 20

ONTARIO 1966 1.1 U 4.3 46 11.9 29 30.4 43 80.3 42 391.2 26 19B5 2.2 30 D.l 11 2.2 53 2B.1 H 66.0 50 m.8 31

ORANGE 1986 2.8 20 9.2 19 46.5 10 86.0 96.9 26 461.2 II 19J5 I.D 35 11.5 II 21.6 10 B6.l 99.8 27 407.8 14

ORLEANS 1166 5.1 II 10.1 H 12.9 21 79.7 12 92.5 29 m.6 42 19B5 5.1 9 7.1 18 2.6 5a 63,9 14 110.3 10 296.4 lb

co I OSWEGO 198~ 3.1 17 7.5 2S 4.2 51 25.9 46 9B.l 23 261.6 41 I'\.)

0 l~a5 .B ,H 3.l 40 2.5 51 31.1 41 96.5 30 282.0 H

OTSEGO 19B6 .0 46 1.1 58 1.1 58 15.2 S9 98.0 24 441.6 13 1985 l.~ 11 6.1 21 6.7 40 42.1 1~ 101.1 2~ 486.8 6

PUTHAK 19B6 .0 46 3.7 49 14.1 23 50.2 21 63.7 54 213.2 53 m5 4.9 10 1.2 53 3.7 49 35.S 34 56.9 56 20B.9 53

QUEENS 1966 0.2 • 4 12.6 10 142.7 141.1 91.7 30 300.2 39 1985 7.7 6 11.0 12 109.2 m.s SO.O 4l 254.1 48

REIISSELAER 1986 1.3 39 5.9 31 11.9 30 52.7 19 71.1 47 273.6 45 ms 1.3 40 4.6 H 10.6 27 57.5 IB 69.4 47 19b.9 56

RICHHOND , 1986 5.9 11.2 12 86.5 124.1 8S •• 36 260.B 49 1985 i .B 10.7 13 8U 5 124,9 5 luU 23 2B2.5 42

ROCY.lANO 19B6 .4 4S 4.5 H 21.0 19 39.5 31 42.5 61 159.8 59 1985 1.1 44 2.3 49 13.6 24 47.1 2l 51.3 60 17&.3 6i1

-... _------_ .. _----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.!._-------------------.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------( (ontlOuEd on oed page. I

lAm ~c AOUll n~kfSI kAlES fER 100,000 fOf'ULAIIOH AIIO RAIE RANt:S fOR SELECIED OfFENSES ~Y CDUNIY FOR 1985 AUb 1986 •• Continued

HUkDER fORC IOLE RAPE R099ERY AG~. ASSAULT BUR6LARY LARCEtIYIl ARkESIS ARRESIS AP.~ESIS ARRESIS A~RESJS ARRESIS

-- .. _- .. __ .... _ .. - ------------- ------------- --'"---------- ------------- -------------

COUNlY "leu Rate Rank Rate Rink Rate Rank Ihle Rant Rite Rank Rale Rink ------- .. -_ ... _--

SI. LAWRENCE 1986 1.8 J6 7.1 20 l.S 5l 25.7 49 100.2 20 lIB. 4 20 1985 2.6 26 .9 55 6.2 42 29.1 4l 104.9 22 298.9 35

SARA IDGA 1986 1.2 41 9.8 16 1.9 37 34.7 31 73.7 48 357.1 30 1985 3.1 10 4.l 36 7.4 35 H.I 31 81.7 40 328.0 30

SCHENECTADY 1986 2.0 28 5.3 19 29.3 15 26.0 U 67.2 52 m.9 36 19B1i 1.3 39 6.6 23 29:2 lJ 25.9 47 60.4 54 296.2 37

SCHOHARIE 1986 .0 46 .0 59 6.7 41 36.9 31 B7.2 37 m.4 1985 .0 H .0 56 .0 56 33.6 36 114.1 14 389.3 IS

en I SCHUYLER 1986 .0 4b 5.7 J7 11.5 31 23.0 53 69.0 ~9 241.4 51

N 1965 .0 ·49 28.6 1 17.1 19 22.0 52 97.1 29 251.3 49 .......

SENECA 1986 3.1 18 3.1 53 9.l II 15.6 59 102.8 IS 442.4 It 1985 .0 H 15.3 6 6.1 43 21.4 56 125.1 11 390.7 17

STEUBEN 1986 1.0 H 4.1 41 6.2 13 23.7 52 79.5 44 280.7 H 1185 1.0 46 4.1 38 4.1 46 22.6 53 64.7. 52 292.8 39

SUffOLK 1986 2.0 29 5.9 32 26.9 16 48.9 23 17.6 46 200.7 51 1ge5 2.9 24 6.0 25 30.S

, 11 53.8 20 78.4 H lT6.S 61

SULLIVAN 1986 2.9 19 19.0 3 35.0 11 169.1 202.6 2 584.5 4 1965 4.4 12 16.3 5 34.0 10 m.B 196.7 2 531.0 3

TIOGA 1986 2.0 30 5.9 34 2.0 57 37.3 33 43.1 60 209.8 56 i 985 2.0 33 4.0 39 .0 56 15.9 58 45.7 62 271.9 H

IOHPKIHS 1986 .0 4b 2.3 55 9.1 31 20.5 55 90.2 32 500.0 19B5 1.1 41 6.9 20 14.7 21 21.6 55 90.B 34 m.1 10

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ ... --------.. ------_ .... _-------------....... ----------------- .. --------- ... _-------------------------( Continued on ned page. I

IA~l[ 2C ADULl A~k[SI ffAIES ~ER 100,000 POf'ULAlION AND kAlE RAIII:S fOR SELEClEO OFfENSES D'/ [OUNIY fOR 1985 AND 1986 I - Cunllnued

HUkDER fORCIBLE RAPE ROBBERV ASS. ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCE/IV" ARP.ESIS ARRESTS ARRESTS ARhESIS ARRESTS ARRESTS

-----------..... --_ ... _-- ..... _--- ... _----------- ----- ... ------- ------------- -------------COUN IY I'ear Rate Rank Rale Rank Rite Ranl Rate Rank ' Rate Rank Rlte Ran~

.. ------_ .. _---- ------- ----

UlSI ER 19B6 I.B 34 1.3 21 21.3· 21 14.9 13 lY.B U m.1 15 1985 3.1 19 Il.1 9 16.5 20 04.1 13 101.5 21 407.9 13

WARREN 1986 1.8 35 3.6 51 1M 28 52.1 20 I14.B 5 610.8 J 1985 .0 H I.B 50 1.2 31 18.5 22 118.6 12 530.2 4

WASHINGTON 1986 .0 46 1.0 29 1M J2 40.4 29 101.2 14 210.9 54 19~5 I.B 36 .0 56 1f.1 2l 56.4 19 81.1 42 2VO.9 54

WAYNE 19Bb 2.l 25 10.2 15 13,b 25 39.8 30 117.0 11 m.1 16 1985 1.1 42 9.1 15 6.9 39 36.6 33 m.¥ 1 m.6 15

OJ I

1') WESTCHESTER 1986 2.B 21 7.1 26 42.1 ' B 66.0 IS 68.2 51 J70.1 28 N 1985 l.8 '14 6.6 24 30.6 9 bl.6 15 67.6 19 361.J 22

WYOHIN6 1986 .0 46 4.9 4i 2.~ ( 56 36.B J5 58.B 56 159.3 60 1~65 4.9 II 2.5 45 2.5 52 36.9· 32 71.3 45 255.1 47

YATES 1986 .0 46 9.4 IS .0 59 IB.9 51 99.1 22 m.2 50 1985 .0 49 4.7 33 .0 56 9.3 59 51.2 CI 186.2 59

HEN YORK STATE 1986 8.0 NA 12.0 HA m.B UA m.7 HA 115.6 HA 124.7 HA '1985 7.5 HA 12.1 NA 110.9 HA 129.0 HA 109.5 UA 383.6 HA

NEW YORK CITY 1986 15.B NA IB.4 HA 212.8 NA 261.2 HA 159.2 HA 521,0 HA 1985 H.4 HA 19.7 HA 23U UA 231.7 IIA 141.0 UA 464.1 UA

------_._-------- .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----I IlYS Penal laH codes lor Ihe Qosl ~ErlaU~ lelony and .isdeDfanor charge In an arred even I hne been organi:ed by UCR Index true categorte~ 10 dloM ~ore ,eanlnglul (Olparisons hith Ihe UCR Index criae

dala presented In Table I of lhls appendiX. The unll 01 count lor arre~t dat., Ihe arrest-event, dillers Iroa lho~e used lor Index crtses (SEe Appendix AI. It is also i.purtant 10 nole lhd these arrest dalJ reflect only adult Ii.e., per~on~ age 16 or older', Mhile trues couilled b'i persons under a.e 16 are included in the Index trlle (Ounts. finally, these data do not necessJrily rellect cleannce~ of the reported CflteS sholln In Table I.

II hffesls far the Index trlAe of '~olor vehicle theft' are reported as 'larceny' because it is noL possible 10 exlract aolor vehlcl~ larcenies IroJ thE ArrEsts and Processir,g Trends File.

NOTE: Dra.alic chdnge£ In rdn~ ~cores sbculd be Interpreted With caution. The ~ensitivlty 01 rate~ 10 relallvely s.,,11 change~ ill ab~olule nu.hers increa~fs a~ the size 01 the population decreases. for e,aL?le, _n Incrfase 01 one III in d given acllvity III a coullty "11h 5,~OO reSidents ~ill cau~e the vdlue 01 Ihe rale to ill(fea~e by 20), .hde an Intrea~e 01 olle 111 in a counly Kith SU,uOil residents wi II cause Ihe value of the rale 10 Increase by only two 121.

SOURCE: HYS DIVISion of Crl~lr.al Justice SerVICES, Arre~ls and Proce~sillg Irends File.

OJ I

N W

l~bLE 20

courm

ALBANY

ALLEGANY

BROHI

BROOHE

CA lTARAUGUS

CAYUGA

CHAUIAuaUA

CHEMUNG

CHENAH60

CLINION

COLUn81A

[ORILAND

DELAWARE

ADUlI ARkESI HAI£S PtR loa,aoo ~OfUlAllOH fOR tDSSESSIDN AlID SALE DF n~U6S' AND fiAlE &ANtS BY (OUHIY fOk 1985 AND 199&

YEAR

1m 1m

1m 1985

1986 1985

1986 I~B5

1986 1985

1986 19&5

1986 1m

1986 1985

198& 1985

198& 1905

1m ms

1986 1985

1986 1985

ImAL ~RUii

A~R£SJS

Ratt Rank

170.8 15 m.1 II

19.5 U ~J. 6 56

1,015.1 891.1

2 2

sa.2 28 5b.5 J4

51.6 IS lB.7 16

41.6 SO 58.9 II

25.2 SB 29.8 52

19.9 61 14.1 61

50.0 11 54.6 lb

118.2 20 105.4 20

100.5 25 92. t 23

42.2 53 90.7 25

46.7 51 49.1 H

CONr~OLLED SU&SJANCE Itl!kES/S

folll toueUlon Silt

Rile R.nk

134.1 16 96.9 Jl

5.9 62 5.9 60

m.1 6~4.1

6B.l 29 lS.l 31

30.5 17 11.6 19

J5.0 It 17.6 2B

12.6 61 19.' 48

16.6 59 8.1 58

n.o U 10.0 31

98.5 20 H.8 20

72. 5 26 54.5 26

23.1 51 30.0 II

21.£ U 21.1 17

Ralt Rank

112.2 Il 72.2 14

~.9 61 5.9 56

m.1 191.S

2 2

U.S 1S 23.5 19

28. I 41 11.1 H

2U U 2B.8 JI

9.8 59 A.9 55

9.9 58 J.l 61,

26.0 41 jO.O 2~

a9.9 17 66.2 16

41.5 29 11.7 26

11.0 55 29.5 36

27.~ 12 IU 19

Rale Rank

14.1 20 2o.B II

.0 57

.0 53

199.7 m.B

26. i 12 8.S 10

1.2 56 ,2.J 17

10.0 II 15.0 19

2.1 55 11.8 21

4.1 45 2.2 H

6.0 11 .0

6.2 II 8.A 29

18.1 21 1,1.9 21

2.1 51 e.1 31

.0 57 10.7 26

IIIIRIlIUANA ARmfS

Jat~1 foueuion Slit

Rah Rank

36.3 II U.S 11

IU 4B 17.7 41

182.0 219.7

2 2

IV.' 11 21.2 32

21.1 2S 21. I 31

12.5 51 11.1 52

12.6 51 10.1 54

1.1 111 S. I 60

IB.O to H.O IS

19.1 12 10.6 18

28.0 16 30.0 14

19.0 17 52.0

19.1 l6 27.7 20

HAlr hnk

ll.8 l4.9

11.9 lO ~.9 51

lU 101.£

3 2

12.8 31 14.1 31

16.4 22 15.2 27

5.0 sa 5.0 56

9.8 48 0,1 48

1. I 60 t.1 58

14.0 29 6.0 5J

13.5 31 'l.B 42

16.5 21 21.5 18

U 56 27.4 It

11.0 20 19.2 20

Rollt Rank

4.6 37 11.6 16

.0 ~6

11.8 15

106 •• 1l9.1

2 2

7.1 21 7. I 32

'.1 l6 5.9 36

1.5 22 6.J 1J

2.8 U 2.1 5J

2.2 50 I. I 57

1.0 12 8.0 2S

6.2 28 20.8 B

11.5 II IU 10

12.7 9 25.1 1

2.1 51 0.5 26

----..... _---------- .. ------------------------------ ------------- ..... _--------------- ... _--.. _---------------------------------------- ------- ... -----.. --------.. -------------------------------------------------------------------I [onli nued on nex I page. I

IABl[ 20

CUUNIY

DUICHES5

ERIE

ESSE I

fRANKLIN

co fULTON I

N -Po

GENESEE

GREENE

HAnlLloH

IIERKlnER

JEffERSON

KINGS

lEMlS

lIVINGSIDH

AOULf ARRESI RAIES PER 100,liOO PDPUlAllOH rOR POSSESSION AND SALE Of DRUGS' AHD utE nAHt.s IV CDUNIY fOR I9US AHD 190t. - Continued

YEAR

198& 1905

198& 1905

198& 1905

198& 1905

19a& 1m

1986 1905

1m 1905

1906 19as

1906 1905

190& 1m

190& 1m

1986 I~OS

198& 1~6S

IOIAL DRUG

ARRESIS

Ritt n.nt

HI.. 19 luB.2 19

m.4 12 m.6 1

61.4 39 l6.S 41

101.3 22 82.1 21

58.6 42 21.5 58

49.1 49 :n.9 49

m.s 96.9 21

160.0 11 60.2 12

22.4 60 11.8 41

67.1 11 36.1 46

691.9 ~16.8

21.1 56 21.0 53

11.1 35 42. 9 41

[ONIGDLLEO SU651AIIC£ ARRESI5

lot II 'ontuioft SiI,

R.t, Rink

120.1 18 as. 1 IS

m.2 11 109.l e

41.1 ]V

16.2 40

89.0 22 11.1 15

U.O 18 5.1 61

21.2 SO !l.5 S2

266.0 1 82.0 11

160.0 10 60.2 21

17.9 51 29.9 II

16.' 16 26.2 H

565.5 101.2

21".1 52 11.9 SI

S6.1 11 2U 16

fiat, R.nt

91.5 16 6I.S 10

12U 12 OU 16

44.1 30 22.0 41

86.8 19 12.0 21

29.1 40 l.6 60

1D.1 It 10.2 52

220.0 6 71.2 11

160.0 B 40.1 24

9.0 60 28.4 32

31.5 14 21.9' 31

32M m.l

15.8 54 1.9 54

15. B 16 I~.I H

RAie R.nk

19.9 19 16.1 11

II.. 26 IS.. 10

.0 51 S.l II

2.1 52 2.1 48

U.5 21 .G 51

6.8 31 1.1 S2

21.8 15 2.4 46

.0 51

.~ 51

V.O 15 .0 53

5.5 U 1.4 IG

178.0 115.0

1.9 16 .~ 53

20.5 IS 1.1 19

ftARIIIUAHA ARRESIS

lahl tautuion 5.1,

Rde B.nk

20.6 28 23.1 2&

41.2 10 65.l 1

19.3 35 S.l S9

IS.l n H.O II

12.0 52 18.G 19

22.1 21 20.1 35

28.~ 15 16.9 U

.0 62

.0 62

4.5 59 11.9 to

21.0 21 10.2 5S

128.4 161.6

4.0 60 IS.9 45

15.4 4S 2U 31

Rlit R.nk

15.2 2S U.S ]0

35.1 8 61.4 S

1V.3 12 2.8 61

II.' 42 1l.1· 12

11.0 U 9.0 45

17.0 19 16. , 24

19.0 14 12.1 38

.0 61

.0 62

'.5 59 12.0 to

12.1 31 6.0 51

55.8 16.7

.0 61 1.9 49

11.9 19 12.0 19

Rde R.nk

5.~ 12 U 2l

1.6 21 3.9 18

.0 S6 S.S 19

6.8 25 11.1 6

1.8 54 9.0 20

5.1 34 l.4 H

9.5 11 4.B Il

.0 56

.0 sa

.0 S6 6.0 34

B.& IS 1.4 50

72.6 90.9

4.0 U 1.9 29

1.. It 8.6 25

---..... ---.. ---------_ ... _----------------.. --------.. -------------------------------------- .. -.. --------------------.. _-- .. _---------------------------------------------------------------- .. _---------_ .... -------...... -------------_ .. I Cauhnued on nul pAge. I

OJ I

N tIl

lAbLE 20

[OUNIY

MOlSON

MOURor

HOH160MERY

NASSAU

NEW YORK

NIAGARA

ONmA

OijONOAGA

OH1ARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

015£50

AOULl ARkESI RiilES PER l~iI,OOO POPULAlION fO~ fDSSESSION AND SALE Of DRUGS' AND ~AIE RANKS BY (DUHIY fOR 19D5 AND IYBA - (onti~ued

HAR

IYOA IYOS

1YB6 1m

1986 1905

1m 1m

1986 1m

1906 1985

1986 1965

1986 1985

198& 1985

IY06 1985

198& 1m

1906 1m

1906 1985

100IlL DRUG ~kRESIS

Rde R~nk

34.5 55 12.0 62

101.1 24 &S.I 31

174.1 J3 121,8 16

m.5 16 m.l 15

2,m.7 2,10.&.9

96.0 2A 56.1 35

61.2 3B 19.9 . 30

91.5 27 96.0 n

49.9 4B 68.2 29

1'10.1 10 161.0 9

51.4 46 21.0 59

75.3 31 31.1 51

52.1 H 7'1.2 29

CONlkOLlfO SU8SlaNC[ ARkESIS

lold fo~uuion SAlt

Rate R.nk

21.0 55 l.O 62

18.6 24 41.9 JO

w.e It 99.0 12

139.2 15 92.5 14

·2,241.0 I ,6~0.!

BO.1 23 42.0 29

52.] II 39.1 l2

AB.I 28 59.1 25

lO.O U 51.1 21

111.8 m.1

28.3 48 10.2 51

46.0 31 II. 9 5~

n.B 15 l2.0 J7

Halt Rink

18.0 51 .0 62

4M 21 . 2~.. 4J

itO. I II VI. I D

94.3 15 61.1 11

I,m.~ 1,102.3

41.1 id 20.2 II

3U 39 23.1 40

]B.4 13 21.5 l5

11.1 18 11.4 28

156.9 lui. I

12.9 56 10.2 51

21.1 47 5.9 57

11.8 51 21.0 16

Rile Rink

1.0 51 1.0 • U

IU 20 II.S 25

loS H .0 53

31.5 8 19.9 Il

52B.] m.1

JO.O 9 9.3 12

16.1 21 H.O n

25.1 Il 2U 1

2.2 5l 20.6 12

1M 29 24.1 V

12.9 10 .0 5l

22.6 J6 5.9 16

16.9 22 5.1 17

IW!IIWAUA A1tR£SIS

Told fOUluiOll S~lt

ad, ft~nk

13.5 50 9.0 511

2M 21 21. J 25

26.' 17 22.S 21

3D.] 12 11.0 11

393.1 55&.&

1&.1 U It.) 46

14.9 46 10.8 5l

25.0 IB 21.1 21

11.9 35 11.1 41

20.2 ]0 21.6 31

23.1 21 12.8 49

29.1 II 19.1 31

18.& 1D H.2 12

Pilt eank

M 52 V.O 46

17.8 J& 11.5 21

lA.9 10 22.8 J6

24,l iJ 21.6 Jl

I~I.I m.l

12.0 38 B.B U

12.9 II 9.6 41

14.1 26 12.5 15

7.6 51 '1.1 41

17.7 11 16. 'I 25

15.' 24 1.1 50

19.2 J]

I~. 9 II

8.4 50 12.0 10

Rde Rani

6.0 3D .0 sa

4.7 35 5.8 11

.0 5&

.0 58

5.1 1I 7.2 II

229.6 324.2

'.1 tJ 5.5 10

2.0 5] 1.2 5S

10.4 J] 15.1 II

1.1 ~y

I.] t6

2.5 4i '.1 41

1.1 20 5.1 40

10.0 16 8.1 27

10.1 IS 15.2 12

-------------.----;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. _--------------------- .. ------------------------------- .. ----------------------_ ... _---I Continued on nnl plge. I

TAbU 10

[DUNIY

PUTNArt

QUEENS

RENSSELAER

RICHMOND

co ROtHANO I

N ())

Si. WHENCE

SARATOGA

SCHENECTADY

SCHOHARIE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

mUiE"

SUffOLK

ADUlT AfiR£ST RATES PER 10~.UOO ".PULATION fOR tOSSESSJON AND SAl. Of DRUGS' AND kATE RANKS DV [OUNIY fOR 196~ AIID U8A - Continutd

YEAR

1986 1985

19B6 1~85

im 1985

1986 1m

1986 1985

1m 1ge5

1986 1985

1986 1'/85

1906 1m

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1906 I~E5

TOIAl ~RU6

ARRESlS

Rdt Rank

291.7 } 121.] It

420.5 288.3

ALl U H.1 JD

240.1 181.9

141.0 . 18 110.1 IJ

a1.B 29 iii. 0 11

B3.~ 11 91.6 . 21

70.6 U 53.1 n

40.1 51 21.5 51

21. U 59 I~.O 15

ot. 0 12 45, B 12

12.1 52 27.1 ~,

m.o II 16A.1 8

CONIROlLU SU&SMNCE ARH5TS

lolal rOUnUOA

Rate aani

261. , 111.]

124.5 181.5

10.2 H 31.1 39

m.D 12.5 22

m.l 11 I~B.2 9

67.t 10 01.1 18

10.1 21 A6.8 21

51.1 11 11.2 38

2].5 51 fl.4 53

11.2 5B n.1 50

56.1 J2 3J.A J6

2U 51 10.3 56

96.1 21 n.1 19

nalt a.nk

219.2 ~ 14.2 11

109.S m.B

ll.9 Jl U.S JI

11.5 21 49.1 21

81.3 18 6a.2 15

62.9 21 15.0 12

61.5 24 ca.l 22

11.9 11 21.9 42

16.8 5J 1~.1 51

11.2 52 11.4 4a

46.1 21 3605 29

22.1 45 10.1 50

AU 22 H.O 23

SAl.

Rate R.nl

H.S 6 n.t 6

11M H.]

4.i'\ U U U

81.8 15.0 20

21.1 II n.9 5

1.5 to 1.8 51

&.1 It 11.9 IA

5.1 U B.O JI

6.1 JB 1.1 II

., 51

.0 51

£.2 40 1.1 12

1.1 50 .0 53

25.6 14 21.0 8

rtARlHtlANA ARRESIS

101.1 roneuioo

RAif Rank

t.8 5& 16.1 U

96.0 5 106.1 5

21.1 26 35.0 16

14.5 6 107.4 4

21.3 20 21. 9 JO

20.' 2t 11.9 15

n.4 51 21.0 21

19.1 14 21. 9 29

16.& 42 10.' 56

5.1 58 22.0 28

24.9 IV 12.2 50

IA.5 41 11.5 12

100.9 89.9

Rill R.nk

1.' 51 13.6 II

~'.4 41.4

15.' 21 26.t 15

11.2 U 11.1 II

10.' 45 12.8 JI

11.1 18 29.1 12

1.l 55 12.' lb

10.1 U Il.i n

10.1 41 6.1 52

5.1 51 5.1 55

IB.l U 12.2 J7

14.' 21 15.4 2b

88.0 lU

2 1

Silt

Rda Rank

2.~ 41 2.5 52

lY.6 6 59.1 5

~.l Jl 8.£ 24

n.l 18.1

12.1 10 Y.O 19

2.1 47 B.8 22

6.1 27 12.' It

8.1 19 4.0 H

6.1 26 1.4 51

.0 56 11.1 9

6.2 21 .0 58

2.1 52 2.1 54

12.9 S 10.2 11

~----------------------------------------- .. ---- .. --- .. -----------------------------------------.. _---------------------------------------- ... ----------.... _----------------------------------------------------... -------------_ .. I Conllnued on nut page. I

f';~l[ ZO

(OUHIY

SULlIYAN

IIOGA

lonPKIHS

ULmR

'~DULI AP.RE;I RAIES PER 10~,('OO PO~ULAIION fOk fOSSESSIOH AND SALE Of DRUGS' AIID fiA1E RANKS IV [DUNIY fDa 1965 AHD 1986

HAft

1986 1985

1m 1985

198& 1m

1986 19&5

IOIAL LhU6

AtkESIS

Rile Rint

172.0 14 15l,B 10

78.4 II 41.1 it

5l.1 U 4C.8 40

116.' 21 lu9.l IB

[OHlhOLLE6 SU&SlAllCE ARR£SIS

laid Poucnion Sale

Rile R.nt

151.' II 102.1 II

49.0 ]5 29.8 42

40.0 42 29.5 U

99.1 19 82.4 16

Rih Rlnt

100.6 . 14 8~.8 9

21.$ U 2l.8 l8

lB.] ~O

14.1 45

04.1 20 5Y.2 19

RAil H.nt

31.9 1 1.. 15

15.1 25 2.0 SO

10.l 12 10.2 21

10.4 31 19.5 Ii

IlARIHUAHA Ak~E5IS

10141 Pouti~lon Salt

hale Rant

It.' U 51.0 10

21.4 Il 11.9 51

n.7 tv It,] 1D

11.7 41 26.7 22

Ral~ liank hat. h.nk

11.1 4i 2.9 45 45.~ 1 5.9 15

11.8 40 11.& 1 4.0 59 1.9 10

9.1 n 4.& J8 18.2 21 1.1 56

n.. 32 4.3 40 22.0 11 4.9 i2

OJ ~ARREH 1986 1985

m.l 9 155.0 12 IU.I 10 9.0 34 41.2 , 28.0 19

41.. 6 I.B 5~ I

N "-J

WASHIHGIOH

WAYNE

WESICHESIER

WYOHfHG

vms

NEW YORK STAlE

/lEW YORr. ellY

1m 1m

1986 1985

1986 ISS5

1986 1985

19Bb !9as

1m 19i15

19P& ly&5

lll.~ 12

6].] to 19.1 60

101.1 23 98. ~ 22

12U 252.1

27.0 u.o

al.9 n.b

115.5 111.l

1,018.2 8SI.2

51 H .. 10 50

HA H~

HA II.

101.2 10

n.Y 10 IS.9 51

7B.4 25 11.2 11

28M 195.0

19.6 1.4

14.2 n.l

421.7 296.1

870.1 611.1

5& 59

40 45

NA H~

HA NA

U.S 1

lB. 1 ]2 12.3 U

55.1 25 58.1 26

216.' 151.6

19.6 1.9

.0 1.1

218.7 m.1

m.l m.o

18 59

62 59

UA H~

HA HA

9.0 28

1.5 19 1.5 J8

2l.l 17 IU 2l

21.& 10 21.1 10

.0 2.5

14.2 IB.6

Ill. 5 11.0

219.0 161.1

57 15

27 IS

HA N~

HA HA

19.3 II 1.5 61

22.1 22 21.0 21

46.6 51.1

1.4 19.1

70.B 9.1

91.9 1'21.1

m.B m.s

51 1b

7 51

HA HA

HA NA

n.B 19

12.3 J6 1.5 60

12.5 35 14. B 28.

35.t U.l

1 •• It.S

14.2 4.1

48.4 60.4

76,9

102.4

51 29

28 51

NA HA

HA H~

9.0 21

1.0 24 .0 SB.

10.2 U 7.1 18

10.7 12 1l.0 II

.0 ~6

1.9 II

56.6 5 4.1 15

45.5 HA 60.1 HA

100.9 NA m.1 HA

.. --........... ----.--------------------------.. ---~--------------------- .. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. -----... -------------------------------- .. ---------------------------_ ... I hlony .nj 115dfl~d~or .rre51. lhal Include al le •• t one drug charge IPend L~. 01 Ue. York Std. - S.dlons nil .nd 2211.

NOIE: Oldull( cI,.n •• s In r.nk scores should be inlffprflfd wllh (.uIlOA. Ihe sensltivily 01 nits 10 relatively ... 11 (h.ngu in ,b.otut. nUlbers intrusts is Ih •• in 01 the popuillion dfcreuu. for fuople, in IRcrus. clan. III 1ft. gIVen acllVlly In • counLy Wllh 5,0010 r.~id.nh ~III caus. Ih. vdoe 01 lhe r.tl. Lo IncreHe by 2~, .hlle in incr ... e 01 on. III in .. (cunly .i1b 5~,OOO r,sldenh 0111 CdUS. Ihe value 01 Ih. r.te 10 iner ••• e by only iuD 121.

SOUP,CE: H'IS Olv .. ,on 01 Crilln.1 Ju.lle. Services, Drug Arresh .nd PrDce •• ing Irends fil ••

lADLE 2E OWl fElONY AND hlSOEnEANOR AOUll ARRESI RATES rER 1,000 LICENSED DRIVERS AND RA1E RAN~S BY COUUIV fOR IYOS AND 1~06 I

OWl ARRESIS ----.. _----.. ---------------------- -- ... ---.. -------------------------- ------- ... -----

lotal felony Hi sdeaeanor ------... - ... --.. - - .. ------ .. ---- -----------.. -

coum YEAR fide Rank Rate funk Rate Rank --------------

ALBANY 1986 9.0 19 .0 17 9.0 20 1905 11.5 12 .~ 0 Iv.S 12

ALLEGANY 19B6 :I.S 46 .2 52 5.6 41 1~B5 5.2 54 .1 52 5.1 51

BRONI 1906 4.1 58 .0 58 4.1 56 19B5 4.4 58 .0 61 U 56

BROOnE 1986 4.1 54 .5 36 4.2 ~4

co ms 5.0 56 .6 28 4.S SS I

N CA TlARAUGUS 1986 11.1 15 1.2 9.9 16 CO IY8S 9.A 21 .9 B.7 24

CAYUGA 1986 S.B 47 .4 39 5.~ 46 IYOS B.I 32 .6 29 1.6 31

CHAUTilUDUA 1Y86 8.9 25 .Y Il 0.0 25 1~8S B.7 21 .7 20 0.0 28

CHEHUNG 1m 5.5 51 .9 14 U 52 1985 5.l 53 .7 IS 4.5 54

CHENANGO 1986 11.2 14 • i 25 10.5 13 1985 11.0 13 .1 16 10.3 13

CLINTON 1986 9.4 21 .0 20 0.6 23 1985 12.1 9 .1 2l 11.4 9

COLUHBIA 19a6 1.4 . 3S .4 H 6.9 31 1985 1.9 36 .4 H 7.5 35

"----------------------------.. ----------------------------..... _--_ ... _-------------------- .. ----------.. ----------------------... ---------I Continued on nexl page. I

TABLE 2E OWl FElONY "'~ ItISOEHEAtIOR AnULI ARREST RAIES PtR 1,000 LICENSED fiR IVERS "NO RAIE RrIN~S 8Y COUNTY FOR 1985 AND 1986 I - Continued

OWl itRRESTS ------_ .... ---_ ..... _ .. _-------------_ .. -----------------------_ .. _------ --------_ .. _-

TDld felonv Hi sdeaeanor --.. ---------- ------------- -------------

COUNTY YEAR Rde Rank R.te RdOl Rale Rank ----------_ .... -

CORTLAND 1986 10.1 16 .1 56 10.6 II 1985 16.t I .0 62 16.4 I

DELAWARE 1986 7.2 39 .4 42 6.9 3D 1985 B.O H .2 H i.8 29

DUTCHESS 19B6 0.3 29 .1 21 1.6 32 19B5 9.6 20 .1 IB 0.9 21

ERIE 1m 6.1 40 .5 11 6.2 41 19B5 6.7 4l .5 36 6.1 t2

()J ESSEI 19B6 11.7 10 .9 10 10.0 10 I 1985 11.8 II .7 14 11.1 II N

1.0

fRANKLIN 19B£ lJ.1 3 .6 27 12.4 J 1985 9.l 25 .4 40 8.9 23

fULTON 1986 5.9 45 .J 46 5.6 44 1985 6.J 46 .5 31 S.l 45

GENESEE 1m 10.2 11 .9 II 9.1 IB 19B5 9.4 22 .5 35 9.0 20

GREENE 19B£ 0.1 32 .9 12 1.3 34 1985 1.2 41 .J 41 6.B 39

HAKILTON 19B6 6.5 42 .0 62 U 40 1985 10.6 14 .5 Jl 10.1 15

HERKmR 1986 1.4 37 .8 21 6.1 39 1985 7.5 39 .7 11 6.8 40

-----------..... ---------------------------------_ .... _----------------------------------------------------------------_ ..... _------------I Continued on oext pdge.l

TABLE 2E OWl fElONY AND HISDEHfANOR ADULT kRRESr RATES PER 1,000 LICENSED DRIVERS AND RATE RANKS BY coum fOR 1985 ~"B 1986 I - Continued

DWI ARRESTS --------------.. -.---------- ... _---- -------------------------_ .. _----- -------------

lotal Felony Hisdueanor ------------- ---.. --------- -------------

CmINY~ YEAR Rde Rank Rat~ R~nk Rale Rank ... -.. -.... ~""'------

JEffERSON 1996 6.2 43 .6 28 5.6 45 1985 1.1 38 .& 2S 1.1 31

mf:~ 19B6 U 60 .0 60 2.6 60 1985 1.2 S9 .0 S9 3.2 59

lEVIS 19B6 5.5 tv 1.0 9 U 53 1985 6.0 H .9 10 'S.2 50

lIVIN6STON 1986 11.6 II .S 15 11.1 7 1995 13.6 4 .5 34 1J.1 4

OJ I

w HAOISON 19B6 S.4 20 .4 1B 1.9 27 a 1985 B.O 26 .t 37 D.l 26

HONRO~ 19B6 5.5 50 .0 22 4.7 51 1985 5.5 50 .1 19 U 51

MONT60MERY 19B6 14.1 2 1.3 2 12.B 2 1~85 9.4 24 .8 12 D.5 25

NASSAU 19D6 4.5 56 .J 41 4.1 55 1985 S.2 55 .3 .S 4.Y 52

NEW YORK 1986 1.1 59 .0 57 3.1 59 1985 l.1 60 .1 57 3.1 60

NIAGARA 1986 0.0 35 .2 . 51 1.0 10 1995 0.2 29 .2 48 B.O 27

ONEIDA 1986 5.6 48 .J 45 5.1 4B 19a5 5.6 49 .2 50 S.4 to

.. _-_ .. _----------------------- ... _--------..... -------------------------------------------------------'-----------------------... ----------

I Continued on next page. I

1~~LE 2£ OWl fElOtlY AND NISOEIiEANOR ADULT AR~EST HAlES PER 1,000 LICENSED DRIVERS AHD RAIE RANI:S BY COUNIY fOR 1985 AHD 1986 I - Continued

nUl IlRRESIS ---------.. ---'.._------------------ -------------------------_ .. _---- -.. -----~ .. --... -

Total felony ai 5deaeanor --- .. _-------- -----------.~- --------.. _---

[DUm YEIlR Rate Rank Rdl~ Rank Rate Rank -------------

ONONDAGA 1986 5.1 ~2 .2 4B 4.9 49 1985 5.4 51 .2 51 5.2 49

ONTARIO 1986 12.0 5 1.1 10.4 14 !985 10.1 18 1.2 B.9 22

ORANGE 1m 9.0 24 1.1 7 1.9 26 1985 0.0 35 1.0 6 1.0 JB

ORLEANS 1986 S.t H .6 ·31 ~.4 41 1985 4.7 57 1.1 5 l.6 58

CD I OSWEGO !986 O.l JI .2 41 B.O 24 w ~~ 1985 0.1 Jl .1 41 1.0 30

DI5E60 1986 11.9 B .0 1& 11.1 9 1995 14.0 3 .8 11 11.2 3

PUlNA" 1986 9.6 20 .1 54 9.5 17 I~OS Y.4 2J. .1 56 9.3 18

UUEEN5 1986 1.9 62 .0 59 1.9 62 1985 2.0 62 .0 58 2.0 62

RENSSElAER 1986 9.1 23 .4 40 B.6 22 1985 9.0 19 .2 46 9.5 11

RI[HHOHO 1986 2.6 61 .0 61 2.6 61 190~ 2.1 61 .0 60 2.1 61

ROCKLAND 1986 4.4 57 .6 30 J.9 59 1905 6.3 45 .5 30 5.7 46

----------- ... _--------------------------... ---------------_ ... _--------------------------------------------- .. _-------------------------I Continued on nexl page.!

TADLE 2E OUI fELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ADULI ARREST RAIES PER 1,000 LICENSED DRIVERS AND RATE RANKS BV COUNn fOR 1985 AND 1m • - Continued

OHI ARRESTS --.. ---------- .. ----_ .. ------------- - .. _------------------------_ ... _--- ----- .. _------

lot ill felony Hi sdeaeanor ------------- ------------- -------------

COUNTY YEAR Rde Rank Rate Rank Rale Rank --.. ------_ ... _--

ST. LAWRENCE 1986· 11.4 12 .8 19 10.6 12 1905 10.1 11 .1 21 9.6 16

SARATOGA 1906 11.8 9 .5 31 H.t 6 1905 11.0 7 .4 42 12.A 6

SCHENECTADY 190A 6.5 41 .7 26 5.8 ~2 1905 A.B 42 .6 24 6.2 n

SCHOHARIE 1986 11.9 1 .2 50 11.1 5 OJ 1905 11.9 10 .5 32 11.4 10 J W N SCHUYLER 1986 0.4 26 .8 18 7.6 11

1985 7.4 40 .7 22 6.7 41

SENECA 1986 9.9 IS 1.2 O.B 21 1905 10.4 IS 1.2 9.2 19

• I

mUDEN 1986 7.9 36 .S 15 7.0 36 1905 6.S H .6 27 5.0 44

SUffOLK 1986 9.1 22 .n 5S 9.0 19 1905 10.4 16 .1 ~5 10.1 14

SULLIVAN 1986 12.0 6 1.0 11.0 9 1985 12.4 0 .6 26 11.7 a

mBA 1986 0.1 30 1.2 1.1 15 1905 0.6 20 1.1 7.5 l4

TOHPKINS 1986 8.1 H .2 53 7.9 28 1985 1.7 37 .1 54 1.6 32

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. _-.... _---------------------------------------I Continued on next page. I

o:J . w w

. ,

TAblE 2£ OWl fELOHY AHD HISOEHEANOR AOULl ARfiEST RAlES PER I,OOfi LICENSED DRIVERS AND fiAlE RANKS BY [DUNrY.fOR 198~ AHD 1986 I - Continued

fiNI ARRESTS ------ .. ------- .. ----r--------- .. --- ----------------.. ---------------- -------------

10141 felony lIisdueaoor -----_ .. ------ ---------- .. -- ------------

COUNTY YEAR Rde Rdnk Rale Rank R<l1e Rank --..... ---_ .. ---_ ...

ULSTER 1986 8.1 JJ .7 24 7.4 JJ 1985 0.1 31 .4 39 7.7 31

WARREN 198~ 15.3 I .J U 14.9 1985 16.2 2 .1 53 16.1

WASHmGTON 19Bb 11.3 11 1.1 6 10.2 15 1985 13.5 5 1.2 3 12.3 7

WAYNE 1986 12.4 .5 34 11.9 4 1985 13.2 •• 3D 12.1 5

WESTCHESTER 1986 5.1 53 .2 4'1 4.9 50 1985 S.8 48 .2 49 S.6 t7

WYOMING 1m B.4 27 .6 32 1.7 29 1985 0.2 30 .8 11 1.3 36

YATES 1986 4.6 55 .6 29 4.0 57 !905 5.4 52 1.0 7 4.4 57

NEW YORK SlATE 198b 6.0 NA .4 NA 5.6 UA 1905 6.4 IIA .l IIA b.l !In

HEN YORK CITY 1986 2.1 NA .0 HA 2.7 NA 1965 2.9 Hil .0 liA 2.9 NA

I Felony and .Isdeleolnor arrests lhdt include at least one chuge lor a 6WI ollense IVehicle and· Irdfic la.: SLit. 01 Hew York -S~dion 11921.

IIDTE: Ora~dtic changes In rink scares should be interpreted "ith caution. The sensitivity 01 rales to relatively 5ull changes in absolute nUlbers increases as the size 0/ the population decreases. for euople, an increase 01 one III in a given activity in a counly with 5,(100 residents Ifill Cduse Ihe value 01 the rale to Increase by 20, .hile an increase 01 one (II in a county Kith 50,000 residents .ill Cduse the value 01 the rde to increase by o~ly tHO m.

SOURCE: HYS Division a/ C(lIinal Justice Services, ~WI Arrests and f"receSSlng Trends flte •

TAeu lA fElONY IH~m"ENTS BY COUNTY fOR 1~95 AND 1986

FElOHY INDICI"ENIS .. _------------------------------- --------------------------------- --- .. -... _----------

Violent Other lotal ---------------- ---------------- ----------------

COUNIY Year NUlber Percent Hueber Percent "uaber Percent -------... -----

AL9ANY 1m 178 18 •• 2B6 61.6 464 100.0 1985 IU l2.1 lilt 61. ~ 440 101l.O

ALLEGANY 1m 8 It.l 48 85.1 56 100.0 1995 10 10.2 4~ 81.8 55 100.0

BRONX 1m 31650 49.1 3,118 50.9 7,428 100.0 1985 1,73B 56.4 2,895 43.6 6,633 100.0

BROOKE 19B6 III 21.3 J49 12.1 480 100.0 19B5 BY 26.9 405 1l.1 m 100.0

CATJARAUGUS 19B4 25 22.1 DO 71.9 III 100.0 o:J 1985 20 22.0 71 79.0 91 100.0 I W .p.

CAYUGA 1996 32 31.1 71 69.9 101 100.0 ms 11 29.8 13 70.2 104 100.0

CHAUTAUQUA 1986 51 23.5 186 1&.5 m 100.0 1985 51 21.1 168 16.7 219 IM.O

CHEHUNG 1986 73 27.2 m 70.0 250 100.0 1985 16 22.4 264 77.6 340 IOu.O

CHENANGO 1986 12 9.0 J22 91.0 134 100.0 1965 11 30.4 39 69.0 56 10\1.0

CLINTON 1986 42 20.2 107 71.8 H9 100.0 1985 17 2U 91 71.1 128 100.0

[OLUH9IA 1986 11 21.2 41 78.9 52 100.0 1985 31 34.1 60 65.9 91 IGiI.v

[OR lLANO 1m 23 24.7 70 75.3 93 100.0 19~5 20 15.5 lu9 84.5 129 10il.0

DELAWARE 19B6 Y 32.1 19 67.9 28 100.0 19B5 29.6 19 70.4 27 100.0

-----.. ------------------------------------------------------------------_!._----------- ..... _._------------------------------------------

, Continued on next page. I

(::'

IA~LE JA FElONY INDICTHENIS &Y COUNTY fOR 1985 AND 1986 - Conltnued

mONY INDIClnENTS -----... _---- .. _ ... _----- ... ------------ -------------.. ------------------- ---------------..

Violenl other Tolal ---------------- ---------------- ----------------

COUNTY Yeir Nuaber Percent Huaber PErcent Humber Percenl ------------... -

DUTCHESS 1986 82 24,6 251 15.4 m 100.0 1985 80 21.4 "291 19.6 m IGO.O

ERIE 1986 m 31.1 961 68.9 ',l98 100.0 1985 m JI.S 1,028 68.S 1,501 100.0

ES5EI 1986 15 11.1 IIJ B8.J 128 100.0 1985 19 20.2 7S 79.5 94 100.0

FRANKLIN 1986 12 21.1 40 76.9 52 100.0 1905 1\ 17.5 66 02.S 80 100.0

FULTON 1986 21 32.9 5S 67.1 82 100.0 ~ 1985 Il 15.1 70 81.3 8J 100.0 , W tn GENESEE 1986 22 19.& 90 80.4 )12 100.0

1985 28 25.1 81 14.1 1C9 100.0

6REENE 1986 21 21.1 60 12.1 8J 100.0 1985 22 H.4 42 65.6 61 100.0

HMILTON 19t1> IB.S 11 81.3 16 100.0 1985 16.1 5 OJ •• 6 100.0

HERKIHER 1986 10 12.2 72 81.8 82 100.0 1985 15 24.2 41 75.8 62 100.0

JEffERSOn 1986 66 22.1 m 17.9 299 100.0 1985 65 21.4 213 7b.6 218 100.0

KI~GS 1986 4,514 ~2. 9 4,025 41.1 8,5l9 100.0 1995 4,641 59.9 l,IOl 40.1 1,751 1011.0

LEWIS 1986 9 25.0 21 75.0 36 100.0 1985 5 13.2 J3 8U 38 100.0

LIVINGSTON 1986 43 16.4 219 8U 262 100.0 1m 41 22.1 166 11.9 211 100.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------... ----------------------------------.. ------------------I Continued on next page. I

!ABLE 3A fElONY IHD!C1HEIIlS &Y COUNTY FOR 1985 AIID 1906 - Continued

fELONY I"Ble!HEN!S ---_ ... _--------.. _- .. ------------- .. - ---------------------_ .. _--------- ----_ .. _---------

Violent Other lohl -----_ .. -- ... ------ --_ ... _--.. -------- ----------------

[OUNTY Yeilr Nuaber Percent Hueber Percent HUlber Percent ------------_ ..

HADISOH 1m 32 23.2 106 16.8 138 100.0 1905 10 22.4 104 11.6 Il4 100.0

HoNROE 1996 m 2M 1.001 10.1 1,428 100.0 19D5 441 30.1 1,010 69.1 1,451 100.0

HoHTGONERY 1906 21 10.4 93 81.6 114 100.0 19a5 15 le.3 67 81.1 02 100.0

HASSAU 1906 961 36.0 1.712 64.0 2,611 100.0 1905 962 39.9 1,441 6u.1 2,'09 100.0

HEW YORK 1986 4,202 59.3 2,B8~ 40.1 7.081 100.0 co 1985 ',416 63.& 2,52! 36.' 6,9l9 100.0 • w

'" NIASARA 1986 101 20.5 254 11.5 m 100.0 1985 98 2O.! 24B 11.1 H. 100.0

ONEIDA 1906 190 31.0 186 61.0 516 100.0 1995 139 31.6 301 £8.~ 440 100.0

ONONDAGA 1906 420 31.1 904 68.3 I,m 100.0 1905 m 31.4 810 £8.£ 1,269 100.0

ONTARIO 1986 63 2!.7 203 16.3 266 100.0 1985 49 22~ 9 165 71.1 214 1U0.D

o~AN6E 1986 152 31.2 m 68.8 481 100.0 1965 us 21.1 m 12.1 521 101),0

ORLEANS 1906 30 30.3 69 69.7 ~9 100.0 1985 52 35.9 93 61.1 145 I~O.u

OSWEGO 1986 37 21.9 IJ2 18.1 169 100.0 1985 39 21.3 IH 70.7 IOl 100.0

OTSEGO 1986 10 22.2 35 11.8 ~5 100.0 1~85 1 25.9 20 74.1 21 100.0

- .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. --------------------------------------I Conllnu~d on nell paye. I

TA&LE 3A fELONY IHDICTHENIS DY coum fOR 1905 AUD 1906 - Continued

mONY lHDICTHENIS --------------------_ .. _---------- -------------------------------- -------------_ .. -

Violent Olher 10t.1 ----.. _---------- ---------------- ------------.. --

COUHH Year Huaber Percent liuaber Percent Nu.ber Percent ----.. ---------

PUmM 1986 l2 IB.1 m 81.l 111 10D.0 1905 IS 13.4 91 0&.6 112 100.0

QUEENS 1986 3,297 n.o i,m 5&.2 1,520 100.0 1905 1,~6t 50.5 2,911 49.5 5,015 100.0

RENSSELAER 1986 45 21.1 121 12.9 166 100.0 1905 52 20.3 Il2 11.1 lot 100.0

RICHHOHD 1906 214 41.1 l07 58.9 521 100.0 1985 175 54.5 116 15.5 l21 100.0

ROCKLAND 1986 B4 19.7 m 80.1 426 100.0 OJ 1985 19 18.0 361 82.6 440 100.0 I

(,) ST. LAWRENCE 1986 2& Il.S 16& . 86.5 lY2 100.0 -...J

1985 17 10.1 161 81.l 198 100.0

SARAIOGA 1906 49 31.6 106 60.4 155 100.0 1965 62 lO.O 101 62.0 16l 100.0

SClifNECTADY 19B6 48 20.2 122 71.B l10 100.0 1985 59 25.0 177 15.0 236 100.0

SCHOHARIE 1906 10.B 39 81.3 48 100.0 1985 28.6 15 11.4 21 100.6

SCHUYlER 1986 13 40.6 19 59.4 12 100.0 1985 9 32.1 19 67.9 20 100.0

SENECA 1986 Il 17.3 62 82.7 15 100.0 1905 7 17 .9 J2 82.1 39 100.0

STEUBEN 1986 34 21.4 125 78.6 159 100.0 1985 :S1 28.3 ' 86 11.7 120 100.0

SUFFOLK 1986 B11 29.2 I,m 70.a 2,800 100.0 19B5 971 32.0 2,061 68.0 3,032 100.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. _------------------ .. ---------------

I Lonllnued on nell pdge. I

TABLE JA FELONY INDICTHEHTS &Y COUNTY FOR I~B5 AND 19B6 - Continued

mONY IHDIClnEHlS --... ------------------------,.----- -----------_ .. _-_ ........... _------------ -----------------

Violent other Tolal ... - .. _------------ ------------_ ... _- ----------------

COUNTY Veu Nu.ber Perc~nt Nuaber Percent Nuaber P~runt

--------------

SULLIVAN 1986 49 22.2 172 17.8 221 100.0 19B5 46 32.6 95 61.4 141 100.0

TIOGA 1m 19 19.0 81 BI.O 100 100.0 1985 1 U 66 90.4 13 100.0

TOMPKINS 1m 41 24.8 124 15.2 165 100.0 1985 39 21.1 99 72.3 m IflO.O

ULSTER 198: 51 22.4 171 71.6 220 100.0 1985 64 20.9 2H 19.2 308 100.0

ro WARREN 1986 11 26.8 30 73.2 41 100.0 I 1985 13 26.S 36 13.5 49 100.0

w co

WASHINGTON 1986 IB 25.1 52 14.1 70 AOO.O I~OS 25 32.9 51 67. t 16 100.0

WAYNE 1986 • 34 15.7 182 84.3 216 100.0 1985 34 11.3 163 82.7 191 100.0

WESTCHESTER 1986 499 35.1 924 64.9 11m 100.0 1985 5&9 39.1 S64 60.1 1,433 100.0

UYOHINS 19B~ 17 21.0 4b n.o 63 100.0 1985 6 9.4 58 90.6 61 100.6

YATES 1986 IS 29.4 36 10.6 51 100.11 19B5 1 13.1 H BU 51 100.0

HEW YORK STATE 19B6 21,Bll 39.1 31,m 60.9 551810 100.0 1905 22,000 H.O 2B,Ol6 56.0 50,016 100.0

HEU YORY. CITY 19B6 16,115 44.9 19,755 55.1 35,910 100.0 1985 16,102 53.0 14,291 l7.u 30,393 10('.0

SOURCE: NY5 DIVIsion 01 Criminal Justice Services, Indlcteent 5t~tl5tlcal ·Syslea.

IABLE 4A 015POSIlI0l15 mULlIIIG non mOHr AND nlSDEnEAHDR Ahfl£SIS IADU1I5 Dum Of mE or DISPOSIIION AND (DUm fOIl nBS 1\110 1986

OISPOSITIONS RESUllIH6 fROlI fElOH1 , HI5DEnEANlIR ARRES!S e --_ .. _-------.... -.. --- .. - .. _------ _ .. -_ .. - ... -----------------.... _--- -------------.... - ... _------------ - .. _------------... _------------- --_ ..... -------_ .. - .. _------------ ... --------------.,.-

Conviction. Acquit14h On.huh Kal Prosecuted Dlb.r lOlal ------ .. - .. ------- ---_ ... _--------- ... .. --------_ .. ---- ... --.......... _- .. ------ .. -_ ....... _-- .......... - --------... -------

COUNTY Vur HUlb.r Percent Huabor Per unl HUlb.r Percenl NUlb,r rerc.nt NUlb" Pucent Kuaber fercrnt --------------

ALBANr 1986 ',lBb 11.9 20 •• i,m 21.2 .1 28 .~ :i,m 100.0 1985 ',191 11.9 15 .1 I,~J~ 21.1 .1 25 .1 5,161 100.~

AlL~GAHr 1m 2hD 11.S 0 .0 105 28.0 .0 2 .~ 115 100.0 198~ m 61.1 I .3 101 31.1 .3 0 .0 m 100.0

BROHI 1986 23,m 66.2 110 .9 10,486 29.2 I,m 1.1 149 .1 15,m 100.0 19a5 21,6~1 70.5 m 1.0 8,611 24.8 1,181 1.1 III •• H,9S • 100.0

BROOKE 1m 2,341 71.7 21 .1 678 21.6 ,0 98 1.1 l,W 100.0 1965 211~2 H •• , .6 m 22.0 .0 19 2.7 2,881 100.0

OJ CAIIARnUGUS 1986 . BSt 84.6 •• 118 ".1 .0 •• 1,010 100.0 I

w 19B5 n6 B2.1 .3 153 11.2 .1 .2 881 luO.u U)

CAYUGA 1986 611 10.8 9 1.0 m 2B.O 0 .0 2 .2 906 100.0 1985 845 1~.1 0 .0 218 24.1 u .~ i .2 I,m 10~.~

CHAUIAUQUA 1986 1,514 14.3 Il .& 502 21.6 .0 9 •• 2,017 100.0 1985 1,522 15.6 10 .5 m 23.6 .0 5 .2 2,~H lu~.iI

CIIEKUNG 1986 1,011 1 ••• .f m 25.1 .0 .1 1,'01 100.0 1985 1,1~6 1I.~ . .. 'm 24.1 .0 .1 1,501 lu(;.u

(HWANGO 1986 524 17.9 • 0 III 21.2 .0 •• m 100.0 1965 591 l~.S .9 116 ~2.l .l 1.1 171 106,0

CLiNION 1986 811 19.5 .0 m 16.8 .0 ·10 1.0 1,021 100.0 I~B~ 907 8l.2 .1 118 16.3 .0 4 .4 l,u9~ 160.0

COLUKBIA 1986 511 5B.6 .1 401 41.2 ,0 .1 m 100.0 1985 666 61.2 .2 115 38.1 .2 .4 l,u89 IGO.O

CORILAHO 1986 m 56.5 .1 4JB n.9 .0 2 .2 1,020 100.0 19&5 7H 61.1 •• m 32.1 .0 2 .2 1,109 100.0

DELAWARE 1m 166 14.9 .2 155 2'.9 .0 0 .0 m 100.0 1965 416 72.B •• I1l ~u .2 0 .0 654 100.0

~~ ... ---~---------- ... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. ------------------------_ .. _-------------------------.. -----------------------... _- .. ----------.. ---------------I Continued on neat p~g •• I

IABLE 4A DISPOSIllOfiS RESULlItIG FhO" FElOIIY ANO HISOEHEANOR AkRESIS (AOUm ONLY) OV TYPE OF DISPOSITION AND COUHfY FOR 19B5 AHD 19B6 - Continued

~mOSIllOHS RESULIING fROH fElONY 1 HISOEHEANOR ARF.ESIS I

----- .. ----------------------- --------------------- .. -------- ----.,----------------------- ----------.. -----------------~- -------------------------... __ ..... ----------------

Convicl!~ns Acqulltah Dislissds flol f'roseeuled Other 10111 ----------_ .... --- ---------------- ---------------- ------------_ ... _- --_ ... ------------ ----------------

COUlllY Year lIu.ber Per un I Nuaber Percenl NUAber PercenL lIu,ber Percent NOAber PerunL Huaber Percenl ---- .. ---------

OUICHESS 1m 2,515 59.9 B .2 I,m 38.0 0 .0 81 1.9 4,201 100.0 19B~ 2,947 62.0 4 .1 1,111 36.0 2 .0 Bl I.B 4,751 100.0

ERIE 1996 10,701 59,6 196 1.1 6,949 18.1 15 .4 21 .1 l7,m 100.0 1905 1I,2BO 63.7 212 1.2 6,1J2 14.6 51 .1 ,41 .2 17,120 luO.O

ESSEX 1986 m 75.0 .0 Il9 24.1 .0 5 .9 576 100.0 I~B5 no 77.4 .4 117 21.2 0 .0 6 1.1 551 100.0

fRANI:LIN 1986 640 82.2 2 .1 115 17.3 .1 .1 11'1 100.0

IJJ 1m 540 83.6 2 .3 104 16.1 .0 .0 646 100.0 , ~

FULION 1m 523 80.8 .2 120 18.5 .0 3 .5 647 100.0 0 1985 562 19.1 .0 It2 20,0 .4 2 .1 76~ 100.0

GENESEE 1986 668 80.5 .5 ,156 IB.D .1 .1 810 100.0 19B5 566 92.1 .4 12l 11.2 .3 .0 114 100.0

GREENE 1986 560 BI.9 5 .1 111 11.1 0 .0 2 .3 684 100.0 1m 131 79.8 1 .6 102 18.9 I .2 1 .6 510 100.0

HARILTOH 1986 38 82.6 .0 17.4 0 .0 0 .0 46 100.0 1985 31 80.4 .0 19.6 U .0 0 .0 46 100.0

HERKlHER 1986 SIB 86.S .2 75 12.6 .0 .5 597 100.0 1m 518 8U.S .2 M 10.1 .0 1.0 619 IM.O

JEFfERSON 1986 B48 85. Y .1 128 11.0 .1 .9 987 100.0 1985 J8t 86.5 .l III 12.5 .2 .4 906 160.0

KINGS 19B6 32,464 61.1 148 .7 16,015 11.1 2,319 U 272 .5 51,448 100.0 1~85 29 ,25B 64.6 m .8 1l,129 29.0 2,m 5.1 204 .5 15,m 100.0

lEWIS 1986 98 7£.0 .0 29 22.5 .0 1.6 129 100.0 1985 IbG 19.6 ,5 l8 IB.9 0 .0 1.0 201 100.0

LIVINGSTON 1986 901 78.9 .4 m 20.5 .0 .2 1,145 100.0 IY85 6&l 01.6 .2 169 11.5 .0 .7 1,002 100.0

---- .... ---------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I Continued on ned paqe. 1

....,;

TAOLl 4n DISP051l10lIS RESULTING HOH FHONY AND nlSDEHEANOR h~RES1S (ADULTS ONLY! BY lYfE OF DISPOSITION AND COUNIY fOP. 1~85 AND 198b • Continued

DISPOSll10NS RESULTING FROH fELONY & HISDEHEANDR ARRESTS I

----.. -------- .. -- .. - .. -----.... --- .. ------------ .. ---------------- ------------------------------ ----------------------------_ .... ------------------------------ ----------------Ccnvlctlons ncqulthIs Di sli ssal5 Hol Pr~secuted Other Tolal

---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------....... ---------------- --_ .. -------_ .. ---[DUm Year Hueber Percent H""ber Percent lIutber Percent lIunber Percent nu.ber rercenl ".,ber Percent -----_._------

HAOISON 198b m B2.2 .1 144 16.6 0 .0 .6 870 10G.0 1965 b48 8U .0 124 16.0 0 .0 .1 71l 100.0

hONRDE 1986 S,JH H.4 101 .~ S,750 49,6 282 2.4 06 .7 lI,m 100.0 1985 5,512 49.9 104 .9 S,218 46.1 212 1.9 11 .6 11,177 100.0

ffONT60HERY i98b 6S0 90.9 .6 51 7.1 .0 10 1.4 m 100.0 1985 m 07.9 .6 7S 10.4 .7 3 .4 721 100.0

NASSAU 1986 10,~a2 79.S 122 .9 1,978 14.4 1B7 . I .• 48'1 l.6 13,758 100.0 1985 12,H7 BS. 'I

co 95 .6 l,b75 11.1 101 .7 218 1.5 H,SlB 100.0 ,

-Po NEW YORK 19B6 67,601 66. 'I 401 .4 JO,m JO.2 1,6&7 1.1 m .8 101,OI~ 100.0 ..... 1985 69,2BI 69,4 m .4 2&,5b6 16.6 2,225 2.2 1,448 I.' 99,895 100.0

NIAGARA 1986 2,927 79.1 20 .5 m 20.0 0 .0 1 .2 3,691 100.0 1985 3,020 78.6 36 .9 m 20.2 0 .0 I.l .3 3,814 IOU

ONEIDA 1986 2,054 Bl.1 .1 40J 16.1 2 .1 .1 2,473 100.0 1985 2,006 03.2 .2 192 16.1 0 .0 .1 2,411 100.0

ONONDAGA 1986 1,862 59.6 15 .5 2,524 39.'1 .0 61 .~ 6,485 100.0 1985 3,950 bO.1 38 .6 2,46B 37.8 .0 ~8 I.S b,576 luO.O

ONlARIO 1'186 1,245 B2.0 .5 256 16.9 4 .J 7 .5 1,519 100.0 1985 I,;)lb 81. 7 14 1.1 204 15.9 12 .9 .4 1,281 100.0

ORANGE 198b 2,149 5P.4 7 .1 I,BBS 40.0 .1 61 1.1 .,107 100.0 I'IB5 3,057 58.2 14 .J 2,102 40.0 .1 18 1.5 5,255 100.0

ORLEANS 198b 155 16.1 0 .0 105 22.4 .2 4 .9 445 100.0 198~ 277 61.b 12 2. Y lIS 28.0 .7 1 .1 410 100.0

OSWE60 1984 1,075 72.5 .5 m 24.7 .1 1 .2 1,402 100.0 1985 1,136 77 .b .5 307 21.0 .1 13 .9 1,464 11)0.0

OTSE60 HBb m H.O .4 lOB 20.2 .0 4 .~ m 100.0 1985 8~O 00.3 .5 19~ IB.O .1 12 1.1 1,(,59 1(,0.0

--------_ ... _- ... ------------------------------- .. -----------------------------------------------.. ----------------------------.. ------------------------------_ .. _--------- ... _-------------- .. -------------------- .. - ..... - .. -I Continued on nfll page. I

IABLl iA DISPOSlTIONS P.£SULlIH" fROM mONY mID ~ISD£H[ANOn AkR£5IS (ADUltS ONLYl BY mE Of DISPOSIilON AND COUNIY fOR I~BS AND l~il6 - Continued

DISPOSI1IONS ~E5ULlING fROK fElONY L KISO£nEANOR ARRESTS • .. --------------------_ ... ------ _ .. ----------------... ----------- ------- .. ---------------------- ------------------------------ ------_ .. _-------------------- ... ------- ... ----_ .....

CDnvlctlons Acquittals Ols.isuls Hal Proseculed Olher T~hl

---_ ...... ---------- ... ------.. ---.. ---- ---------------- ----------- ..... _-- ------- .. -------- ----------.. -----

(GUUI Y Y~dr Nu.~er fer(ent lIuabeT hrccnt Nu.ber Percent lIul~er Percent Number Percenl. lIuaber Percent --_ ....... - .... -- .... -

PUTI/AK 1986 119 61.3 .2 m l8.0 0 .0 .5 1,112 100.0 I~BS b65 61.3 .3 410 31.0 0 .0 .& 1,005 100.0

QUEENS 1986 16,m 64 •• 299 1.1 8,156 33.2 Il9 .~ 195 .7 26,J85 100.0 1985 17,111 66.8 287 1.1 7.825 lO.5 182 1.1 119 .5 25,624 100.0

RENSSELAER 1986 I,m 77.1 .4 m 22.4 0 .0 .1 I,B~5 100.0 1m I,m 76.9 .5 m 22.3 0 .0 .J 1,941 100.0

RICHHOND 1986 2,2BIo 44.2 Il .J 2,24b 43.4 584 11.3 46 .9 5,175 100.0 1985 2,209 42.9 15 .J 2,255 43.B loll 12.3 J6 .7 5,HIo 160.0

CP ROCKLAHO 19B6 '1,624 106.6 2 .1 791 32.5 .0 20 .0 2,m 100.0 I

.j::> 1925 1,962 71.5 4 .1 7bI 27.7 .0 16 .6 2,143 lUO.O N

ST. LAWRENCE 19B6 1,044 74.1 .4 J53 25.1 0 .0 6 .4 1,40B 100.0 1985 867 67.9 .B m lCt.8 0 .0 /, .S 1,18B 100.0

SARATOGA 19B6 2,297 74.3 .2 7B4 25.3 .0 3 .2 J,093 100.0 1985 '2 1 356 76.5 .1 716 21.2 .0 5 .2 3,080 100.U

SCHENECTADY 19B6 1,121 77.0 .J m 21.2 2 .1 31 1.4 2,242 100.0 1985 I,SeS 76.3 .3 HB 21.9 5 .2 25 1.2 2,~51l 100.0

SCHOHARIE 19B6 369 70.0 .2 m 28.3 0 .0 1.5 527 '100.0 I~BS 319 72.7 .9 120 25.11 .2 .4 4&6 I~O.O

SCHUYLER 1986 m 8J.9 0 .0 4l 16.1 .0 0 .0 267 100.0 1985 liB 8\,2 1 .4 39 15.1 .0 I •• 259 106.0

SEHECA 1986 l5B 65.6 .2 186 34.1 .0 I .2 546 100.0 m5 m 62.2 .2 172 l6.S .4 3 .6 HI 100.0

STEUBEN 19B6 810 75.4 .4 m 23.1 .1 5 .5 1,014 100.0 1985 707 71.7 .7 266 27.0 .1 5 .5 986 100.0

SUffOLK 1986 IJ,m 76.8 !11 .6 J,9BB 22.0 .0 96 .5 IB,143 100.0 1985 14,261 71.1 96 .S l,962 21.6 .0 91 .5 18,414 100.0

----------- ..... _---- .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ------------------------------------------------------.... _-----------( Conlinu2d Oli next page. I

IABlE IA DISPOSITIONS R£SULIING FROM fElONY kilO HISDEHEAtlOR A~R£SJS tADUlTS OHlYI OY mE Of DISPOSIIJOH AND [Ounry fOR 1985 AND IY86 - Continued

DlsrOSllIOHS mULliNG fRO" FElONY. hISOEn£AIIOR ARRESTS D

----_ .. _ .. --.. -------- .. --------- .... _----- .. -------------_ .... _---- -------;----------------------- .. ---.. - .. ------------ ... ---------- -------------_ ....... ------------- .... _-------------Convictions Sequithh Disausals Itot Prosecuted other 10t41

_ .. -------- ... ----- ---_ ........ ----.. ---- ---------------- --.. _- .. - .. --- .. --... - --------------... - ---_ .. -----------[OURfY Year Hu.ber Percent Ilu.ber Percent NUAber Percent Huaber Percent ltuAber PercEnt Nuaber Percent --........ -----~---

SULLIVAN 1986 1,251 72.'2 .3 410 21.1 .0 0 .5 I,m 100.0 1m 1,300 61.2 .2 m 32.4 .1 5 .1 1,~lS 100.0

TIOGA 1986 m 79.2 5 .0 116 1M .0 J .5 596 100.0 1965 m 79.1 0 .0 125 20.1 .2 2 .1 &22 100.0

TOnPKIHS 1986 706 51.S I .1 m 46.5 .0 27 2.0 1,372 100.0 1985 B02 60.B II .8 tal 36.6 .4 n 1.4 1,120 100.0

ULSTER 1986 1,8H 68.4 0 .3 Bl2 JO.O .1 10 .4 2,700 100.0 1985 1,11B 69.3 12 .5 141 29.9 .0 7 .J 2,419 100.0

OJ , .f'> ~ARREH 1906 1,103 71.9 .0 428 21. Y .0 J .2 I,m 100.0 w

19B5 1,111 72.9 .1 402 n.' .2 6 .4 1,524 100.0

"ASHIUGTON 1986 515 80.0 0 .0 Il5 19.8 .0 .1 681 100.0 1985 597 81.0 2 .J III ID.O .0 .7 m 100.0

WAYNE 1986 1,111 71.5 .~ 511 21.9 .0 1 .2 1,814 100.0 1985 1,266 11.1 .2 m 22.3 .1 4 .2 1,6(.2 10G.0

WESrCHESIER 19B6 D,m 72.1 55 .5 2,824 24.2 116 1.0 260 2.2 11,678 100.0 1985 a,m 72.l 71 .6 2,B46 25.1 67 .6 161 1.4 lI,m 100.0

NYOHIR6 1986 197 70.4 .4 81 2B.9 .0 .4 280 100.0 1985 195 13.9 .0 67 25.4 .4 .4 264 100.0

YATES 19B6 156 85.7 .0 25 13.1 0 .0 .5 182 100.0 1965 III 81.2 1.2 13 U.S 0 .0 l.2 III 100.0

NEN YORK SlATE 1986 248,128 61.0 2,251 .11 110,615 . 29.8 6,602 1.8 1,027 .0 m,m 100.0 1985 251,609 69.3 ',261 •• 99,0.6 21.l 7.22£1 2.0 l,m .9 361,264 100.0

NEW YORK C lTV 1986 143,093 6S.1 I,m .6 68,on 30.9 S,911 2.7 1,491 .7 219,919 100.0 1985 142,521 67.5 I,m .6 58,160 21.1 6,706 3.2 1,9l8 .U 210,m 100.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. -----------------------------------------------.------------------------.. --... ----------------------------------- .. ------I Disposition d.ta are based on Ihe year 01 sentencing lor convictions and on the year 01 dispo~itiDn lor acquittals, disll~sals, nol prosecuted, and 'other' dispositions.

underreportlng 01 di5po~ltaons to the DiVISion of [rilinal Jusllce Services Isee Appendix fl. lIlese data uy be all eeted by the

SOURCE: HVS Division 01 [rllinil JusLice Services, Arrests dnd Processing Trends file.

ImE 40 fil5POSlllONS mUllING Hon fElONY ARRESIS (ADUm ONlYI &Y lYPE or DISPOSIlIONS AND COUNIY FOR 1m AIID 1996

DISfOSIlIONS mUlliNG FRO" fElONY ARRESIS D

--_ .. _------------------.. ----- ----------------_ .. _-----_ ... ----' ------------:..----------.. ------ -----------.... _------_ ... _------- ---------------.. -_ .. -- .. -_ ... _-_ ..... ----------------

ConVlclions Acquithls Dis.isuls Hot Profeculed Otber lotal --_ .. _----------- .. -----------_ ........ - ..... --- .. ----- .. --- ---------------- -------_ .... __ ... _-- ----------------

tuum Year Nuaber Percent UUlber Pertent HUlber hrcent "uaber Percent HUlber Perunt HUlber Percent -----_ .. -------

AL9ANY 1996 1,302 00.1 19 1.2 282 1J.5 .2 8 .5 1,614 100.0 19B5 1,255 19.3 II .7 lO~ 19.0 .2 16 1.0 1,5B2 100.0

AllEGANY 1996 17 87.S 0 .0 10 11.4 0 .0 I 1.1 9B 100.0 1985 47 75.B 0 .0 IS 21.2 0 .0 0 .0 62 100.0

BROHI 19B6 Il,m 61.7 291 1.4 6,192 30.2 UO 3.3 82 .4 20,481 100.0 1995 1l,1B7 67.9 296 1.5 5,193 26.& m l.5 136 l.B 19,412 HlO.O

BRoonE 19B6 550 90.8 .6 105 15.4 .0 22 3.2 6BI 100.0 1985 534 79.7 I.u 109 16.2 .0 19 2.8 6£8 100.0

co I CAT! ARAUSUS 1986 .168 85.1 .5 25 12.B 0 .0 2 1.0 196 100.0 .p.

.p. 1995 '117 90.7 1.6 10 7.8 0 .0 0 .0 m 100.0

CAYUGA 198£ IBI 81.6 .9 27' 13.6 0 .0 2 .9 214 100.0 1985 206 B2.1 .0 45 17.9 0 .0 0 .0 m 100.0

CHAUTAUQUA 1986 m 82.7 .0 61 17.0 .0 .J m 100.0 19a5 ·290 85.5 .J 46 13.6 .3 .6 m 100.0

CHEnUH6 1986 276 B'.9 .7 28 9.1 .0 I .J 307 100.0 1985 293 90.1 1.6 26 8.3 .0 0 .0 314 100.0

CHEHANGO 1996 72 79.1 0 .0 16 17.6 .0 J l.l 91 100.0 1985 1i11 87.0 2.4 8 6.S .0 :; 4.1 12l 100.0

CliNION 1986 21l 19.2 1.0 42 15.6 0 .0 2.2 267 100.0 1985 175 97.9 .S n 11.1 0 .0 .5 199 100.0

COlUH91A 1906 112 70.8 0 .0 70 28.8 0 .0 •• 213 loo.a 1985 106 6B.1 .4 19 29.0 2 .1 2.2 m WO.D

CORIlANQ 1996 1\4 BB.l 0 .0 19 11.7 0 .0 0 .0 163 100.0 1985 IJ2 19.1 0 .Il 36 21.3 .0 I .6 169 100.0

DELAWARE 1996 101 87.0 0 .0 16 13.0 0 .0 0 .0 12l 100.0 1995 92 10.0 2 1.7 24 20.3 0 .0 0 .0 118 100.0

________________________________________ 1. _________ , ___ ... ____________________________________ .. ____________________________________________ -: ________________________________________________________________________

I Conlinued on lIe.t page. I

1 ABLE lB DISPOSIIiONS RESULlIlIG FRO" fELONY ARRESIS IADULTS ONLYI BY TYPE OF DISPOSII ION AND COUUIY FOR 1985 AN~ n06 - Contlnued

DISPOSITIONS RESULTING FROK meav ARRESTS' -------------- .. --.. ------.. ---- --------------_ ..... _----_ .. _----- ------------------- .. ---------- ----... --_ ..... --- ......... _----------- -_ ... _-------------------------- ---------_ ... _----

Convlctlon5 Acqulllah DUDlsuh Hal Prosecuted Otber Tolal ----------- .. ---- -----_ .. _-----_ .. - ---------------- .. _---------.... --- ---------------- ----------------

COUIIlY YfU NUDber Percent Huaber Percent NUDber Percent Nuaber PerCEnt Huaber Percent Nuaber Percent --------------

DUTCHESS 1986 128 60.2 2 .2 J2l lO.2 .0 15 1.4 1,06e 100.0 1905 800 70.5 2 .2 liS 27.0 .0 18 1.6 1,135 100.0

ERIE 19B6 2,1BO 57.l 96 2.0 I, OS8 lB.9 74 1.5 14 .J 4,852 100.0 19B5 2,71B 59.S 89 1.9 1,701 37.1 U 1.0 66 I .• .,600 100.0

ESSEI 1986 102 16.1 0 .0 29 21.6 0 .0 2.2 114 100.0 1985 13 80.2 0 .0 11 10.7 0 .0 1.1 91 100.0

fRANKLIN 19B6 100 84.1 .0 16 1l.6 .B I .S liB 100.0 i 1985 95 90.5 1.9 9 1.6 .0 0 .0 105 106.0

.1 OJ I

.p. FULlOH 1986 .129 96.1 .7 1.0 0 .0 0 .0 m 100.0 (J1

1985 11>9 B9.9 .0 20 !U.5 I .5 I .5 IYu lOu.O

GENESEE 1986 107 88.4 .0 1l 10.7 .8 0 .0 121 100.0 IY85 III 92.Y .7 8 5.7 .7 1 .1 141 100.0

GREENE 1996 147 04.0 1.1 25 14.1 .0 0 .0 115 100.0 1m 0101 &2.1 I.b 19 15.4 .8 I .B 123 100.0

HMiuON 1986 16 100.0 , .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 16 100.0 1985 II 1l.1 lJ .0 4 n.7 0 .0 0 .0 15 101i.0

HERKIHER 1986 Il1 91.9 .0 12 D.I 0 .0 0 .0 UY 100.0 1985 III 89.0 .0 H 11.0 0 .0 0 .0 121 100.0

JEFFERSON 1986 246 82.8 0 .0 49 16.5 .J .J 297 100.0 1m m 8U l 1.2 21 D.l .9 1.2 253 100.0

KINGS 199b IB,550 61.~ 321 1.1 .9,117 31.1 1,711 5.7 160 .6 lO,lOO 100.0 1985 11,41u 64.0 m 1.2 7 ,46~ 27.4 1,882 6.9 2,006 7.4 27,229 100.0

LEWIS 1996 46 95.8 .0 2.1 0 .0 2.1 48 100.0 1965 39 90.7 2.l 4.7 0 .0 2.1 II 100.0

LlYINGSION 1986 154 92.2 1.2 11 6.6 .0 0 .0 167 100.0 1985 94 B7.9 .Y 10 9.l .0 2 l.Y 107 100.0

- .. ------------- .. ---------------------------------------------------------------.. ---- .. ------------- .. -------_!.--------------------.. ---------_ .. ----------------------------------------------------------_ .. _-------

I Continued on ned pdge. I

IAUlE 4& DISPOSIIiONS RESULTIH" FkOH FElONY ARhESIS (ADULTS ONLYI BY IYPE Of DISPOSIIlON AltO coum FOR I~B5 AND I~06 - Continued

OISPOSIIlOHS ~ESlJlTlHG fROn fElONY ARRESIS I - ... -- ...... -------_ .. _------- .. ---_ ..... -------------------------_ .... - .. ---------------------_ ... _----- -_ ... --- ... _ .. _-------_ ..... _ ... ---_ .. --- -------_ .... _----_ ... ------------- _ .......... -----_ .. _---

Convlcllon~ ~tqulthls Dhai5HIs Not Pr05etuted Otber lotal ----------- .. ---- ---------------- --.... ------------ ---------------- -------------.. - ----- .. -------.. --

(OUIIIY Year Nuaber Percent NUlber Pucent Nuaber Ptr"nt Huaber Percent Nu.ber Percent NUDber Percfnt _ ....... ------.--

MADISON 1986 143 B6.7 3 t.O 16 9.7 .0 3 1.8 16S 100.0 1985 111 BU 0 .0 11 t2.6 .0 I .7 m 100.0

nONROE 19B6 1,710 61.2 39 1.4 £U 23.8 274 10.1 J9 I.~ 2,705 100.0 1985 I,m bI.6 51 2.0 595 23.5 209 B.l 250 9.9 2.530 160.0

HOHI60HERY 1986 112 94.9 .S 5 •• 2 0 .0 0 .0 liB 100.0 1m 89 60. ~ 1.6 12 10.91 5 U 1 6.4 110 100.0

NASSAU 1986 3,524 12.7 57 1.2 bl8 Il.t 1BO 1.7 440 9.1 .,819 100.0 1m 3,7t6 02.9 46 1.0 m 10.0 96 2.2 m 6.1 .,510 10M

OJ I HEW YORK 1986 20,399 56.1 112 .9 14,667 40.1 m 2.1 228 .6 36,164 100.0 .p.

0) 1965 21,778 60.3 118 .9 13,172 36.4 W 1.0 870 2.4 16,130 luO.O

NIASARA 1986 650 79.9 .9 154 18.9 0 .0 4 .5 015 100.0 1m 6BI 80.0 10 1.2 IS6 la.l 0 .0 4 .5 051 100.0

ONEIDA 1986 507 8b.4 3 .5 71 12.1 2 .l .1 587 100.0 IY85 ·S29 90.6 . 0 .0 51 B.7' G .0 .7 564 100.0

ONONDAGA 1986 I,m 72.9 18 .9 505 25.0 .0 25 1.2 2,023 100.0 1m 1,36] 72.8 IB 1.0 4b4 ~4.8 .1 2b 1.4 1,87i 100.0

ONIARIO 1986 271 91.4 1.0 11 1.0 1.0 2 .1 290 100.0 1m 2Q2 oa.6 1.3 12 5.3 1.9 11 4.8 220 100.0

ORANGE 1986 761 67.B •• 1t1 10.4 .2 15 1.3 1,121 100.0 1m BN 6B.O .5 lb8 20.4 .J. 29 2.2 1,294 100.0

ORLEANS 1906 110 85.5 .0 18 I 11.8 .7 2·" 152 100.0 I~S5 Y4 11.8 10 7.6 24 10.1 1.5 U 131 100.0

OSWEGO 1986 248 B7.6 1.1 31 11.0 0 .0 .4 281 100.0 1985 214 n.1 .4 12 1.5 0 .0 l.u 265 luO.D

0lSE60 1~8b 121 82.3 2.0 21 It.l 0 .0 2 I •• 1t1 100.0 IY85 m 17.1 .6 31 la.o .6 7 •• 1 In 100.0

---.----.. -------~------------ ... ----------------------------------------------------------.. -------------.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I [ontlnued on n.xt page. I

ThBLE 1B DISPOSIlIONS RESULllHG HOH fELONY A~P.ESTS IADULIS OHm BY mE OF DISPOSlIlON AHD COUHIY fOR 19B5 AND 198b - Continued

OISPOSII IONS mUlliNG fROK fElONY ARRESTS I

..... ---------------------.. -_ .. _- --------------_ .. --.. ----- .. ----- -_ .. ------------------ .. _--.. ---- --------------------------.. _-- -------_ ... _----.. -- ... ------------ ---------------(onYlcllons Acqulthh DlsDlual5 Hot Prosecuted Othor Total

-- .... _----------- -----_ .. _-------- ---------------- .. --------------- ---------------- ----------------

(OUNn Year N.aber Percent H.lber fercent NUlbet Percent Hu.ber Percent NUAber Percent Nuaber Percent -------- .. ---_ ..

PUTHAK 1986 103 52.6 0 .0 91 46.4 0 .0 2 1.0 196 100.0 19B5 97 51.6 2 1.1 96 45.7 ° .0 3 1.6 189 IOO.~

QUEENS 1996 9,201 61.9 21B 1.6 5,201 J5.0 105 .7 IJ2 .9 14,879 100.0 1965 7,719 62.7 209 1.7 ;, US 13.5 171 1.4 2S2 2.0 12,336 160.0

RENSSELAER 19B6 319 81.4 .5 71 18.1 0 .0 0 .0 J92 100.0 1985 m BI.4 .2 74 10.1 0 .0 I .2 40B 100.0

RICHHOND 1996 1,004 49.1 .4 8£5. 42.3 IJO 6.4 J9 1.9 2,016 100.0 o:J 1985 9b1 41.3 .4 B87 I

n.4 152 7.4 183 B.9 2,016 100.0 +:> '-l ROCKLAND 1986 ·526 14.3 2 .J 175 21.7 0 .0 5 .7 70B 100.0

1965 567 76.4 2 .3 111 21.0 0 .0 2 .3 m 160.0

ST. LAWRENCE 19B6 95 67.4 .0 44 JI.2 ° .0 2 1.4 141 100.0 1985 b9 bB.3 1.0 29 ::B.l ° .0 2 2.0 101 100.0

SARATOGA 19B6 4lB B1.1 .6 80 15.3 .2 I .2 523 100.0 1~65 ·3B9 78.6 .2 101' 20.8 .0 2 .4 495 100.0

SCHENECTADY 19B6 414 B2.B J .6 71 14.2 .4 10 2.0 500 100.0 1985 JH BI.I 4 .9 69 15.0 .7 14 l.O 4U 100.0

SCHOHARIE 1986 85 82.5 1;0 Il 1M 0 .0 J.'i 10] 100.0 1985 5i 79.1 2.7 12 16.2 0 .0 1.4 74 100.0

SCHUYLER 19B6 52 BB.I ° .0 11.9 0 .0 0 .0 59 100.0 I'iBS 52 9U 0 .0 5.5 0 .0 0 .0 55 10G.G

SENECA 1986 9B 76.6 .8 29 22.7 0 .0 0 .0 128 100.0 1985 50 74.6 1.5 16 23.9 0 .0 ° .6 67 100.0

STEUBEN 1986 175 74.6 1.7 5] 22.6 .4 .4 234 100.0 19B5 119 76.B 2.6 37 19.1 .5 1.5 m 100.0

SUffOLK 1986 J,b3B 79.7 H 1.0 845 18.S .0 31 .7 4,561 100.0 1985 3,774 BU 45 1.0 B24 11.6 .0 45 1.0 4,688 100.0

.. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. --------------------------- .. --------.. ------------------------------------------_ ...... _--..... --------------------------------I Continued on next paqe. I

IABLE 48 DISPOSITIONS REStlLlING FhD" FELONY AhRESIS IADULlS OULYI DY JYfE Of DI5POSIlION AND COUNn FOR 198~ AHD 1986 - Continued

ClSP051ll0NS mULliNG fRon fELONY AmSIS I

------------_ .. -----_ ... _---- .. -- .... -_ .... --------_ .. _------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------... -.... ---------- .. ------- ----------------Conviclion~ AcqullIaI~ Di s.i ss~15 Hot Prosecuted Other lot.I

.. --_ ........ --..... -.. -- ---------------- ---------------- -_ .... _------------ --------......... ---- ---------------.. COUNTY Year NUlber Percent NUlber Percent lIuober Percent Huaber Percent ~u.ber Percea! Nuaber Percent .. -- ....... -...... _---

SULLIVAN 1986 360 71.1 2 .4 IC4 22.1 0 .0 I .2 4b7 100.0 1985 m 6U 0 .0 144 29.9 0 .0 2 .4 481 100.0

TIOGA 1986 116 87.2 2 1.5 I~ 11.1 .0 0 .0 III 100.0 1185 94 89.7 0 .0 II 10.4 .9 I· .9 106 100.0

TOnPKIHS 1986 109 61.6 .0 57 32.2 0 .0 11 6.2 177 100.0 1985 157 66.2 1.7 66 21.8 2 .8 10 4.2 217 100.0

O::J I ULSTER 1986 4b4 14.2 •• 152 24.3 .5 2 .J m 100.0 ~

1985 414 74.1 .7 140 24.0 .2 6 1.0 S84 HiO.O 00 ,

WARREN 1986 221 72.5 0 .0 84 27.5 0 .0 0 .0 305 100.0 1985 m 75.2 2 .8 57 23.9 0 .0 0 .0 2J8 IO~.O

WASHINGTON 1986 IJ5 82.8 0 .0 27 16.6 0 .0 .6 163 100.0 1985 125 86.2 2 1.4 H 9.1 0 .0 2.8 145 100.0

WAYHE 1986 217 80.7 .0 52 19.3 0 .0 0 .0 269 10.0.0 1985 214 91.1 .4 21 8.2 0 .0 1 .4 257 100.0

WESTCHESTER 1986 2,711 76.7 30 .8 m 19.2 51 1.4 65 I.D Jim 100.0 1985 2,767 79.1 U 1.2 600 11.2 11 1.1 86 2.5 l,m 100.0

WYOHIH6 1986 62 8U 0 .0 10.0 0 .0 1 1.4 70 100.0 1985 70 92.1 0 .0 7.9 0 .0 0 .0 7b 100.0

YATES 1986 51 96.2 0 .0 1.9 0 .0 1.9 53 100.0 1985 49 90.7 0 .0 1.4 0 .0 1.9 51 100.0

HEW YORK STATE 1986 90,738 6l.8 1,555 I.! 44 lm ll.3 l,917 2.B 1,409 1.0 141,14B 100.0 1985 89,207 66.5 1,558 1.2 38,400 2B.6 1,967 l.O ',999 3.7 134,164 100.0

HEW YORK C 1IY 1986 62,418 60.1 1,176 1.1 36,270 H.9 l,m 3.2 6tS .6 101,886 100.0 1YB5 61,115 62.9 1,155 1.2 30,855 11.8 1,535 l.6 ',047 4.2 97,172 100.0

---... --------------- .. ------_ ..... _---------_ ... __ .... _------- ... -- .. ------------.. -... -------.. _----------------_ ........ -----------.... -----.. -------------_ ..... ----------------------------------- .. -----------------------------------I DIspOSition d.ta are based on Ihe year 01 sentencing for convlcllon~ .nd on lhe year of disposition for ~cquillals, d!Sliss.Is, nol proseculed, and 'olher' dispositions. lhese dal. oay b~ ~lfecled by

underreportlng oi dl~po5illon5 10 Ihe DIVISion of Crulnal Justice Service~ fsee Appendu fl.

50URCE: MYS DIVISion of CfI.in~1 Justice ServICes, Arrest~ and Pro(e~~ing lrend~ File.

lA~lE SA mOHV, HISOEHEAIIOR, AN~ LESSER OffENSE CONVIClIONS RESULllliG HOH rELONY AI/O "IS~["EANOR ARRESTS IAOUlIS ONLY) BY COUNTY rOR 1985 AND 19B4

CONVICllDlIS RESUl T1HG fRon mOHY L "ISOEHEI,NOR ARRESTS • . _--------_ .. ---------_.. _ .... _-- .. - .. -------_ .. __ .. _-- ----------------------------- ----- .. ----------------------- --------- .. ------------------- ----------------

felony -----_ .. - .... _------------ ------------------ ---- -- - .. - ........ _-- ---- ----

lolll Violent Other Hi 5deaeanor Le~5er Ollenlfl . lotal ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- .. ----------_ ... - -----_ .. -_ .. _--... -- --------- ... --- .. --

coulln lear Hueher Pertent NUlber Pertent Nutber Pertent Number Pertent HUlber Perunt "uaber Per tent ----- .... -------

ALBANY 1986 111 1.1 02 1.9 211 5.4 I,m 45.2 2,m 41.5 4,206 100.0 1905 28B 6 •• 61 1.4 221 5.1 2,000 14.5 2,2~l 49.1 4,491 100.0

ALlfGANY 1986 32 11.9 .1 30 11.2 I1l 64.6 61 23.5 268 100.0 1955 11 1.1 .9 15 6.8 . 142 64.5 AI 21.1 220 100.0

BROnl 19B6 4,987 2t.O 2,249 Y.S 2,138 11.5 12,800 53.Y 5,948 25.1 23,135 100.0 1965 4,153 17.1 2,184 8.Y 2,169 8.0 1l,109 51.2 1,109 29.2 24,651 100.0

8ROOnE 1986 JI5 11.4 61 2.9 248 10.6 1,511 67.2 m 19.4 2,341 100.0 19B5 2b6 12.4 71 J.l 195 9.1 1,448 67.3 4JB 20.4 2,152 1(00.0

O:J CAlIARAUGUS 19B6 63 1.4 .9 55 6.4 501 59.4 28~ 11.1 854 100.0 I

1~6S 41 5.6 .5 37 5.1 490 67.3 191 21.1 728 lioO.O .j::>

lD

CAYUGA 1986 BI 12.6 18 2.B 6J· 9.B 391 61.0 169 210.4 tI41 100.0 1965 Il B.b II 1.1 62 7.1 m 65.2 221 26.2 845 100.0

CHAUTAUQUA 1986 121 B.O 29 1.9 92 6.1 972 64.2 421 21.0 1,514 100.0 19B5 III 7.3 24 1.6 81 5.7 %8 61.6 m 29.1 1,522 160.0

CIIEHUIIG 19B6 190 lB. I 52 5.0 IJB 1l.2 1004 65.1 I1l 16.5 1,041 100.0 i~BS 197 11.5 45 4.0 151 11.5 162 67.7 161 14.0 I,m 100.0

CIIENAN60 . 1986 18 3.4 1.0 13 2.5 275 52.5 2JI 44.1 524 100.0 ms 23 3.9 1.0 11 2.6 lSI 56.8 223 37.4 591 160.0

CLINTON 19B6 bl 1.1 1 .9 56 6.9 Jl1 45.6 JBO 46.1 BI4 100.0 19B5 55 6.1 4 .4 51 5.6 m 48.0 m 44.0 m IOG.O

COLUnB IA 19B6 41 1.5 10 1.8 Jl 5.0 25B 45.2 270 47.1 511 100.0 19B5 61 U 1 1.1 51 B.6 110 49.5 272 40.8 666 100.0

CORTLAND 19B6 13 12.1 11 2.3 60 10.4 211 31.1 2B6 49.1 m 100.0 1965 12 9.7 Il 1.7 59 7.9 268 36.0 404 54.3 HI WO.D

DELAWARE 19B6 23 4.9 .4 2{ 4.5 m 54.9 181 40.1 466 100.0 1965 24 5.0 I~ 2.1 U 2.9 248 52.1 2ul 42.9 m IUO.O

--------------.. ---------------------------------------_ .... _-----------.. -----_ ... _------- ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. _--_ .. _-----------------.. -, Conli nued on nell page. I

co I

(Jl

a

IABLE ~~

CQUllTY

DU1CliESS

ERIE

ESSEX

FRANKLIN

FULlON

GENESEE

6REENE

HAmIO"

HERKIMER

JEFFERSON

KINGS

LEUIS

lIYJtl6SJON

HLO~Y, nlSfiEHEAIiOR, nND LESSER OFFENSE CONVICTIONS mUlliNG f~O" FELONY AND hlSDEHEANOR ARRESIS (ADULTS OIiLYI BY COUNIY FOR IY85 AHD IYBb - Continued

Year

1m 19&5

1986 1995

1986 1m

1986 FIBS

1986 1985

IY8b 1905

1986 1985

IY86 m5

IY86 m5

1986 1'lBS

1986 ms

IY86 1955

1986 19E5

Iotal

lIuaber Percent

229 316

all 681

25 ., t.

44 ~2

44 66

70 17

45 ~6

34 36

161 13l

6,394 5,566

23 I~

100 62

9.1 10.7

1.6 7.9

S.B 5.1

6.9 7.8

8.4 12.1

10.5 11.1

a.o b.O

21.1 0.1

6.6 6.6

19.0 16.7

19.1 I~.a

23.5 7.S

11.1 1.0

felony

Violent

Nuaber Percent

47 b4

242 2H

1J 1J

10 18

10 6

34 27

1,254 2,953

11 10

1.9 2.2

2.3 2.2

.5

.9

.9 1.5

2.5 2.3

1.5 3.1

I.a 1.4

5.3 .0

1.4 .1

4.0 3.4

10.0 10.1

6.1 .~

1.9 !.I

CONVlmOHS GESULlIIIG fROn mONY L "150EHE~1I0R ARRESTS I

other

"uaber Percent

182 252

m 641

21 19

3D 31

31 55

60 59

35 20

1 3

27 32

121 101

3,140 2,6lJ

11 11

03 52

1.2 B.6

5.1 5.1

S.l 4.2

5.9 ~. 3

5.9 9.B

U lu.1

6.3 4.6 -

IB.4 9.1

5.2 5.B

IS.O 11.1

9.1 B.9

11.1 b.9

9.2 ~. 9

Hi ~ae,ednor

Huaber PeHent

I,m 1,260

3,496 3,930

m 2" 4-

162 2n

23a m

259 269

2H 2b3

21 21

2BB m

399 IQ2

11,560 10,9~3

37 bB

45b 159

45.0 42.S

32.1 34.9

46.1 5U

56.6 55.2

15.5 4S.2

38.0 45.9

48.9 61.0

60.5 62.2

55.6 59.7

47.1 52.0

35.6 31.4

37.8 I2.S

~O.S

5:.0

lesser 011 enses

Hu.ber PeHent

1,154 1,311

6,195 ~·,461

20B 181

m 2,)0

2tl 240

m 240

241 142

6 11

196 185

28a 245

",510 12,149

38 BO

m 362

45.9 46.5

59.1 51.3

4D.1 43.0

16.6 37.0

~6.1 42.1

50.1 41.0

43.0 12.9

15.8 2U

31.8 11.0

14.0 11.3

44.1 43.6

10.8 50.0

38.4 41.0

Totd

NumbEr Percent

2,515 100.0 2,W 100.0

10,704 100.0 11,260 100. G

m 100.0 m 100.0

640 100.0 540 100.0

523 100.0 562 100.0

668 100.0 586 WG.O

560 100.0 m 160.0

38 100.0 31 100.0

516 100.0 54u 100.0

910 100.0 m 10 •• 0

32,164 100.0 29,25B 106.0

.ya 100.0 I ali 1i,0.O

903 100.0 as) !oo.o

-- --- .. --- ~ .... -...... -- -_ .. ------- --_ .. --- ------ .... ----.... ---------------------------------- -- --_ .. --- ........ ------ ----_ .... --_ .. --- ...... -_ ............ ---------------------------------------------------------------1 Continued ~n next page ••

ln~ll ~A HLONY, ItlS~mt::Op., n:m LESSER OffEtl~£ COIIVICTlOIIS R£SULlING fRon fELONY Aim HISD£h£ANOR f,RRES1S IAnuLls ONLY) BY cowm fOR 19B5 AN& 199b - Conlinued

[OIl'IICTIO~S RESClllNG FRO" mOllY L NI5nf;;[A!lOR Afi~ESTS J _____________ w .. _OO'____ __ ... _ .. ___ __ ____ __________ __ - __ -__ -_- .. - ________ .... ---- -- -- --- .. --- .. --- -- -- - ... ------ ------ -- ----- .. -_ .. ---------- -------- ------ --- .. - ... ----

f~lcny ---- ~ -- - .. ------ -- .. --- -- ------------------------ ------- .. ---------

Total Vialent other ~i ~dE£;lr.or lesser Ollense~ lobI .. ------ --------- ---------------- ---------------- -----_ .. -------_ .. --- .. -- ---- -- ---- .. -- -------- -----

COU:,1'i hlr ~Llber Percent 1I.,ber Percent Nu.ber Pf(C2nt Nu.~zr P~rcent Nuber Percent flu~bEr rercent ----- .. ------- ..

MAPISON 19Bb 66 9.2 16 2.2 SO 1.0 m 59.7 222 31.0 715 100.0 19&5 B8 Il.b 10 2.8 10 ·10.0 m 5~.5 m 36.0 648 100.0

"ONROE 1~86 960 17.9 212 3.1 68a 12.8 2,107 42.9 2,107 39.2 5,lH 100.0 1965 811 15.1 267 4.0 5H ' 10.1 2,610 41.9 2,061 31.0 5,512 100.0

HONT60HERY 1986 55 8.S 1.1 40 1.4 210 41.5 325 50.0 650 100.0 1935 69 10.9 1.1 62 9.8 272 42.9 m 46.2 631 1UO.0

NASSAU 19B6 1,.16 IS.3 584 5.3 1,094 10.0 ',527 41.2 ',717 U.5 10,982 100.0 1985 1,515 11.9 54l 4.3 m 1.6 6,099 11.8 5,ilJ 40.1 12,741 1U0.0

OJ HEW YORK 1986 8,146 12.0 1,031 4.5 5,115 1.6 40,811 60.4 18,640 27.6 67,603 100.0 I 1'185 7,499 10.8 3,250 4.1 4,2H 6.1 41,667 60.1 20,115 29.0 69,261 100.0 tIl

I-'

NIAGARA 1986 135 4.6 31 1.1 102 3.5 981 33.6 1,809 61.0 2,927 100.0 '1 1985 169 5.6 J9 I.J flO 4.J 1,160 36.4 1,751 58.0 3,020 100.0

OIIE lOA 1986 241 11.7 87 4.2 m 7.5 1,045 50.9 76B 37.4 2,054 100.0 1995 215 10.1 • 15 3.7 140 7.0 1,060 51.0 711 35.4 2,006 100.0

OIlONDAGA 1986 929 24.1 261 6.8 668 17.3 1,514 39.7 1,179 36.2 l,862 100.0 1m 8J! 21.1 246 6.3 5D6 14.8 1,5.9 3'1.0 1,577 39.9 3, '150 100.0

ONTARIO 1986 229 10.4 13 2.7 196 IS.7 m 56.0 319 25.6 1,245 100.0 19£5 m 17.1 34 3.1 m 13.9 St~ 5J.l 305 29.2 1,046 luO.O

ORAIIfiE 1986 277 10.1 S9 2.1 216 1.9 998 36.3 1,474 53.6 2,149 100.0 1'165 m 12.4 96 l.1 282 U 1,227 40. i 1,452 41.5 1,051 100.0

ORLEANS 1986 60 16.9 14 3.9 46 fl.O 201 56.6 94 26,5 m 100.0 1m H 26.7 16 5.8 5B 20.9 153 55.2 50 10.1 m 100.0

05W[60 1986 118 11.0 19 1.8 99 9.2 452 42.0 505 41.0 1,015 100.0 1955 12u 10.6 28 2.5 92 D.I 5ll 45.2 SOl ".1 1,116 101l.0

Ol5E60 1986 37 5.0 .9 30 4.1 m 29.2 485 65.0 131 100.0 1985 44 ~. 2 .9 36 4.2 2H 29.1 559 b:i.O 850 lu~.O

--.-------------------------------------------------------------------------____ ... ___________________________________________________________________________________ w ________________ .. _________

I Continued on ol:xl pdge. I

fABLE 50 fELOIIY, "fS~l"Er'NOR, AND LESSER OFFENSE COIIVIClION5 RESULlIUG FRO" FELONY AND HISDEHEANOR ARRESIS (ADULTS ONLYI BY COUUIY FOR I~B5 AlID 1986 - Continued

CONVICTJOIlS mUlliNG FRon fElONY L HISOElIEAIIOR ARfiESTS f

---------------- .. ------ ---------------------- .. - ---------------------------- -------------- .. ------------.. - ------------------- ... _-------- -------------- ... -

felony .. -------------------- .. - -----------_ .. - ........ ---_ .. _- -----------------

lot.l Violent Other Hi sde.e.nor lesser all Enses Total ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------

COUlITY Ye.r Ilu.ber Percent HUAber Percent Nu.ber P~("ent Nu.ber Percent Huaber Percept Ilu,ber Percent .. --_ .. --- ... -----

PUINAH 1986 .1 .0 .1 20l 28.2 m 11.6 719 100.0 I~B5 1.4 .l 1.1 m l4.9 424 6l.a 665 100.0

gUEENS 1m 5,028 29,6 1,761 10.4 l,261 19.2 1,081 41.7 .,807 28.8 16,996 100.0 1985 J,511 20.5 1,281 7.5 2,210 !l.0 1,724 45.1 5,816 l4.l 11,111 106.0

RENSSELAER 1906 102 7.1 19 I.l Bl 5.0 m 40.l 752 52.6 I,m 100.0 1995 IlB 9.2 11 2.5 101 6.8 558 H.4 197 5l.4 I,Hl 100.0

RICHMOHD 1986 290 12.1 125 5.5 165 1.2 922 40.1 1,074 47.0 2,286 100.0 1m 269 12.2 136 6.2 III 5.9 9'c .. 41.9 1,015 45.9 2,209 106,0

OJ ROCKlAND 1986 112 19.2 5~ 3.1 262 16.1 665 40.9 6H 19.8 I,HI 100.0 I 1983 lSI 17.9 59 J.O m 14. ~ 7tO 18.7 OSI 41.4 1,%2 100.0 t.n

N

ST. LAWRENCE 1986 .4 .1 J .1 468 H.O 572 S4.8 1,044 100.0 1m .5 .0 •• .5 311 H.O m 51.5 807 100.0

SARATOGA 1986 9B \.3 21 .9 11 1.4 BIO 35.6 l,lBI 60.1 '2,291 100.0 ms 94 4.0 10 1.1 64 2.7 728 30.9 1,511 65.1 2,l56 100.0

SCHENECTADY 19B6 IlO 0.0 lS 2.0 10l 6.0 BOl 46.5 786 IS.5 . 1,727 100.0 1985 166 10.6 11 2.6 125 B.O 117 45.B 682 41.6 I,S65 100.0

(

SCHOHARIE 1986 J4 9.2 .5 32 0.7 158 42.B 177 40.0 369 100.0 ms 2B S.l 2.4 20 5.9 140 41.3 171 50.4 Jl9 100.0

SCHUYLER 1986 20 8.9 1.1 Il S.B 144 61.l 60 26.B 224 100.0 1985 14 6.4 U II 5.0 159 12.9 ~5 20.6 218 166.0

SENECA 1986 10 Il.1 2.S 19 10.9 2lJ 59.5 97 27.1 l5B 100.0 198~ 13 7.8 .l 22 7.5 191 /:5.2 79 21.0 m 100.0

STEUBEN 19B6 91 10.0 9 1.1 72 B.9 lB2 41.2 m I2.B BIO 100.0 ms 09 9.8 14 2.0 55 7.R 3~5 50.2 283 40.0 107 100.6

SUffOLK 1986 I,B7I Il.4 505 1.6 1,366 9.0 I,BI2 1I.S 7,256 52.1 Il,m 100.0 1935 1,970 13.8 m u 1,luO 9~ 0 4,515 l1.7 7,776 5U 14,261 100.0

-------------------------------------------_ .. ____________________________________________ w _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

t COlltinued 011 n~ll page. I

THbLE ~,i FELONY, HIS6EHEANOR, AND LESSER OFFENSE [ONVICIIONS mUllING FROK fELONY AND HISDEHEANOR AkRESIS CADUlTS DilLY I BY [Dum FOR 1995 AND 1906

CONVICfJUNS RESULlIN6 fRDII fElONY l IIISDEIIEANOR ARRESTS I

----------------------- ---------------.. -------- ----_ .. _--_ ...... ------ ... ----.. ' .. _--- --------------------------_ .... ----------------------------- ----------------

felony --------------- .. ------- ... ---------- .... ----------- -----------------

Tfitil VIolent Olher lIisdueinor Lesser Of hn~e5 lotal ---------------- ---------------- -----------'----- ---------------- ---------------- ------... --------

COUI/IV I'ear Hu.ber Percent /lu.ber Perunt Hueber PercenL Number Pfrcenl lIuaber Percent Nuaber Percent .. --~ .. -------- ..

SULLIVAN 1986 136 10.9 26 2.1 110 S.B m 4~.8 543 41.1 I,m 100.0 1905 142 10.9 19 1.5 m Y.5 57B 44.5 580 44,£ 1,300 100.0

T1D6A 1986 61 12.9 1.5 54 II .• 306 64.8 10~ 22.2 m 100.0 1995 49 9.9 I.B 40 8.1 297 60.1 148 30.0 m 100.0

TO"PKINS 1986 54 7.6 11 I.B 4J 5.S 2U 34.1 411 5S.2 706 100.0 1995 102 12.7 20 2.5 92 10.2 113 39.0 lS7 4e.l 002 1('0.0

ULSIER 1996 151 S.l 36 1.9 117 6.3 1,021 55.3 m 36.4 I,SI7 100.0 1985 197 11.5 lY 2.1 159 9.2 m 53.1 6~0 35.4 1,719 100.0

OJ WARREN 1986 Jl 1.0 II 1.0 22 2.0 507 46.0 563 51.0 1,101 100.0 I 1985 31 1.0 6 .5 21 2 .. 4 m 44.7 579 52.1 I, III iOO.O Ul

w WASHING'ION 1m J4 6.2 1.3 27 ~.O 304 55.8 201 3S.0 545 100.0

1985 48 8.0 ,7 H 1.4 290 46.9 269 45.1 597 100.0

WAYNE 1996 127 9.1 23 I.B 104 7.9 752 57.4 m 33.0 I,m 100.0 1985 117 9.2 16 1.3 101 9.0 .m 55.2 450 35.S 1,266 100.0

WESTCHESTER 1986 1,171 1l.9 360 4.4 803 9.5 l,m 41.4 1,260 lB.1 8,421 100.0 1985 1,405 11.2 515 U 870 10.6 J,l8S 41.1 3,402 41.5 9,192 I~O.O

WYOMING 1986 JO 15.2 2.0 26 11.2 S4 42.6 03 42.1 197 100.0 1985 II 16.9 1.0 31. 15.9 95 49.7 67 34.4 m 100.0

YAIES 1986 35 22.4 5.a 26 16.7 07 55.S 34 21.8 156 100.0 1985 39 21.1 1.5 34 21.6 15 52.1 30 20.8 144 100.0

HEM YORK STATE 1986 37,109 14.9 Il,m 5.5 23,437 9.4 119,136 41.7 n,m 31.1 Ha,72S 100.0 1995 31,669 13.4 13,264 5.1 20,405 9.1 121,797 19.4 96,143 38.2 251,609 lIiO:O

HEW YOR~ CITY 1986 24,048 17.4 10,426 1.1 14,422 10.1 13,186 51.1 45,059 JJ.5 J4l,091 100.0 19B5 21,m 1409 9,806 6.9 11,393 8.0 74,374 52.2 4b,94S 12.9 W,521 100.0

_ .. _-------_ .. _--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------..... ----------_ ... _----------------------------------------I Di~posltlon data are based on the year ~I senlenClnq for convictions, lhese dati may be ~flected by the underreportlO~ of dispOSitions La the Division 01 [rillnal Justice ServICes Isee

Appendix Fl.

SOURCE: NVS Division ,of Criunal Justice Services, Arrests and Pr~cessinq Trends file.

I ABLE 58 fElONY, NISDEMEANOR, AND lESSER OFFENSE LONYICTlONS RESULTING fROH fElONY AR~ESlS IADULTS ONLVI BY COUNn fOR 1985 AlID 1906

CONVICTIONS RESULT 1116 FROn fELONY ARRESIS I

---------.. --------------- ---_ ...... _ ...... -------_ .. _---- ----------------------------- ------- ... -------------------- -------- .. _----- .. ----------_ ... - ----------------felony

-----------------_ .. ------ ----_ ....... ---- ------------ ----------- .. -----Told Violent Other Hisdeaeanor Lesser 011 ense5 lolal

... --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ... --- ---... - ... ------ ---------------- -------------... --

COUNlY Year tlu.ber Percent Hueber Percenl Nueber !'ercellt Husber Percent Nutber Percent Nu.ber Percent -- ... -----------

ALBANY 19B6 303 21.1 82 &.1 221 11.0 0&2 6&.2 137 10.5 1,102 100.0 UB5 Z7B 22.2 61 4.9 211 11.3 8BB 10.0 09 7.1 1,255 160.0

ALlEGANY 1986 28 3&.4 2 2.6 26 n.D 4Y 63.6 0 .0 11 100.0 1965 16 J4.0 2 4.3 It 29.0 29 61.1 2 4.1 H 100.0

BRONX 1986 4,m 31.2 2.249 11.0 2,685 20.1 &,099 46.0 2,221 16.B 1J.254 100.0 1985 4,314 j2.1 2,184 16.6 2.1lO 16.2 6,114 46.6 2,699 20.S 13,101 100.0

8ROOME 1986 291 51.0 61 12.2 210 41.0 231 43.1 16 2.9 550 100.0 19B5 254 41.6 11 n.l 101 14.1 24B 46.4 12 6.0 51~ 1('0.0

OJ CAllARAUGUS 1YB6 58 It.S 4.0 50 29.0 107 61.7 3 1.8 16D 100.0 I

1985 36 10.0 1 •• 12 21 •• 70 59.8 11 Y.4 W 100.0 l.n -P>

CAYUGA 1986 10 IB.1 18 9.9 52 2B.1 98 54.1 11 1.2 IBI 100.0 1985 66 12.0 11 5.l 55 26.1 III H.6 1 1.4 2u6 luO.O

CHAUIAUQUA 1986 115 35.3 2Y 0.9 86 26.4 204 62.6 1 2.1 126 100.0 1905 101 14.B 24 8.3 11 26.6 175 60.3 It 4.0 290 10G.0

CHEHUNG 1986 1B2 65.9 52 1B.8 130 41.1 1Y 28.6 15 5.4 m 100.0 1m 190 67.1 45 15.9 145 51.2 01 29.3 to 1.5 2Bl 100.0

CHENANGO 1986 16 22.2 5 6.9 11 15.3 41 65.3 12.5 72 100.0 1985 20 IB.1 6 5.6 14 13.1 79 n.o B 7.5 107 l.iO.O

CUNION 1986 59 21.1 3.3 52 24.4 140 65.1 14 6.6 2Il 100.0 1985 41 2/,.9 2.J 43 2~.6 115 65.7 13 1 •• 175 100.0

COLUHBIA 19B6 40 21.3 10 5.B 30 11.4 lOB 62.0 24 14.0 172 100.0 1965 51 30.6 J.B 50 26.9 III 59.1 18 U IB6 10&.0

CORTLAND 1986 54 31.5 Il Y.O 41 20.5 80 55.6 10 6.Y 144 100.0 1985 51 3B.6 Il 9.6 18 28.0 75 56.B 6 4.5 Il2 100.0

DELAWARE 1986 22 20.6 2 I.Y 20 18.1 1& 71.0 8.4 101 100.0 1585 21 26.1 IG 10.9 14 15.2 64 69.6 4.3 92 10G.0

------------------------------------------------- ... - ... -------------------------_ .. ------------------- .. ------------------------------_ ... -------------------------------------------------------------1 (onlinu~d on /lexl page. I

1 AOLE 5& fElONY, hlS0EH[Ii//QR, (,NO LESSER OffENSE CONVICTIONS RESUUIIIG fROI1 FELONY AR~ESrS IAnUUS ONlY) BY COUNIY fOR 1985 AIID 1986 - Continued

CONVICflOHS RESULTING fROn FElONY ARRESTS I

---_ .. -_ .. _------_ .... _------ ---------------------' -- .. _--- ... - ... _-------------------- ---------------------.. ----_ ... - -----.. - .. ----- .. ---_ .. ---------- ----------------felony

-----------------------_.. -------------------.. ---- -- ... ---- .. ---------Tolal Violenl 01 her Hi sde,einor lesser Olfenses Tald

.. -- .. ------- .. ---- -_ .. ------------- ------------ .. -- ... ---_ ... - ------_ .. _- ---------------- ------------_ .. _-COUNlY Year NUILer Pertent Huaber Percent HUAber Percent Huaber Percent Hu.ber PerceRt Nuaber Percent -------_ .. _----

DUTCHESS 1986 211 29.0 47 6.5 164 22.5 m 59.6 B3 11.4 720 100.0 1985 292 36.5 61 0.0 228 28.5 416 52.0 92 11.5 000 IbO.O

ERIE 1986 762 27.4 242 8.7 520 10.7 1,508 54.2 510 10.3 2,780 100.0 1m 820 29.9 246 9.0 5H 21.0 1,521 55.0 19l It.J 2,130 100.0

ESSEX 1986 23 22.S 2 2.0 21 20.6 68 66.7 11 10.0 102 100.0 196~ 21 28.B 4 5.5 17 21.3 50 68.5 2 2.7 n 100.0

fRANKLIN 1986 31 37.0 6 6.0 31 31.0 61 61.0 2 2.0 100 100.0 1965 31 38.9 a 8.4 29 lO.5 51 53.7 7 7.4 95 100.0

OJ fULTON 1986 41 ll.8 IJ 10.1 28 21.7 81 62.8 7 5.4 129 100.0 , U1 19B5 64 l7.9 Il 7.7 51 30.2 91 57.4 8 4.1 169 100.0 U1

GENESEE 1986 45 42.1 10 9.l 35 32.7 54 50.5 8 1.5 107 100.0 J9B5 69 52.1 18 1l.7 51 lB.9 62 41.3 0 .0 III 100.0

GREENE 1986 40 27.2 10 6.8 30 20 •• 76 51.7 31 21.1 147 100.0 1965 25 24.8 6 5.9 19 10.B 65 61.~ 11 10.9 101 100.0

HAMILTON 1906 56.3 12.5 41.8 n.B 0 .0 16 100:0 1985 21.l .0 27.3 72.1 0 .0 11 100.0

HERKIHER 1986 l2 23.4 S.I 25 10.2 89 65.0 16 11.7 117 100.0 1985 32 2B.l 3.5 28 . 24.0 70 61. ? II 9.7 113 100.0

JEfFERSON 1986 146 59.3 34 1J.8 111 45.5 92 37.4 8 l.3 246 100.0 1905 121 53.5 21 11.9 9~ 41.6 101 45.6 .9 m 100.0

KINGS 1986 6,363 31.3 1,254 17.5 3,109 16.8 6,519 35.5 5,608 30.2 18,550 100.0 1965 5,515 31.8 2,95l 16.9 2,~92 14.9 6,559 n.6 5,336 30.6 17,440 luu.O

lEWIS 1986 2l 50.0 !l.0 17 l7.0 19 41.3 8.7 4b 100.0 1985 12 30.8 2.6 11 28.2 26 66.7 2.6 19 luO.O

LIVINGSTON 1986 88 57.1 17 11.0 71 46.1 64 41.6 1.3 154 100.0 19B5 15 47.9 10 16.6 35 37.2 H 50.0 2.1 94 luO:O

-_._--------.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------.. -----------------------------------_ ... _-----------------------------------.. -----------------------------------I Continued 00 next paqe. I

lADLE 5& FElONY, HISD[H[AllO~, MID LESSER OffENSE CONVICIJONS fiESUlIIN6 fROH fELONY ARmIS IADum ONLY! &V coUlm FOk 1985 AND 19B6 - Conllnued

COIlVlCIIONS RESULTING FROn fELONY ARRESIS I

- .. ----------- ... - .. -_ .. ------ -----_ .. _---_ ....... _-_ ... ----- -----.. - .. ------ ... -------------- -------- .. -- ... - .. _----.. ----- .. --- ---------.. ------------------- ----------------felony

----.... --- ... -----_ .... _------ -----------_ .. - .. --------- -----------------

lotal Violent 01 her Hi sde6eanor Less·er 011 eaSe5 10tal ----------- .. ---- --_ .. ------.... _-_ .... ----------- .... - .. - ....... ---.... - ... - ... ---- --.. _-_ ..... _------- -------------- .. -

COUNTY Year lIulber Percent Humber Percent Nuaber Percent Hueber Percent MUGber Percent Hueber Percent --------------

MOlSON 1986 49 l4.l 16 11.2 l3 2l.1 82 57.3 I, B.4 !4l 100.0 19B5 75 64.1 IB 15.4 57 IB.7 it 35.0 .9 117 160.0

nONROE 1986 907 5l.0 272 15.9 m 37.1 641 37.6 160 9.4 1,710 100.0 19B5 BOO 49.0 267 16.J m 32.6 691 42.5 140 B.6 1,634 100.0

HONIGOHERY 1m 50 44,6 7 6.3 U lB.4 56 50.0 , S.4 112 100.0 1'i85 6~ 74,2 1 7.9 59 66.1 20 22.5 1 1.4 B9 100.0

NASSAU 1986 1,582 44.9 584 16.6 998 28.3 1,600 45.4 m ~.7 3,524 100.0 19B5 1,396 31.3 m 14.5 853 22.8 2,056 51.9 m 7.a J,746 100.0

OJ NEW YORK 1986 B,097 39.7 l,031 14.9 5,066 24.8 8,Y70 H.O J,lJ2 16.3 20,m 100.0 , 1985 7,458 31.2 3,250 14.9 4,21jB 19.3 9,650 45.2 4,470 2~.5 21,778 100.0 U1

())

NIAGARA 1986 130 20.0 Jl 5.1 97 14.Y JBJ 58.Y IJ1 21.1 m 100.0 1965 160 23.5 39 5.7 121 17.0 438 64.1 8l 12.2 681 100.0

ONEIDA 1986 216 42.6 87 17.2 129 25.4 271 53.5 20 3.9 507 100.0 1985 IYI 36.1 75 14.2 116 21.Y ·3u2 • 57.1 36 6.S m 100.0

OIWIIOAGA 1986 SS7 60.2 261 11.7 626 42.5 511 34.7 n 5.2 1,474 100.0 1965 m 58.3 24B 18.2 547 1&.1 496 36.4 72 5.J 1,161 100.0

ONTARIO 19B6 m n .• 3J 12.2 166 61.3 69 25.5 3 1.1 271 100.0 19B5 149 73.8 34 16.B lIS 56.Y 47 23.3 6 3.0 202 100.0

ORANGE 1986 264 l~. 7 59 7.0 205 26. Y lS9 51.1 lOB 14.2 761 100.0 1985 368 41.3 96 10.8 272 30.6 411 48.4 91 10.2 aWl 100.0

ORLEAIIS 1986 56 43.1 14 10.8 42 32.J 71 54.6 2.J 130 100.0 1985 65 69.1 16 17.0 49 52.1 25 26.6 4.J 94 100.0

OSWEGO 1986 112 45.2 19 7.7 93 37.5 126 50.8 10 4.0 248 100.0 1985 108 44.3 2B IU 80 32.8 124 5u.B 12 U 2H 100.0

OTSEGO 1986 36 29.8 5.B 29 24.0 76 62.B Y 7.4 121 100.0 1985 41 30.B 6.0 31 24.8 78 58.6 14 10.5 m 100.0

-----._----------------------------------------------- -~------------------------.. ------------------------- .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I Conll nued on n~.1 pdge. I

TABLE 5& FELONY, HISDEH[i\NOR, AND LESSER OfFENSE CONVICTIONS RESULIING fRO" fELO~Y ARRESTS tAOULlS ONLYI BY COUIIIY fOR 1985 AND 198b - [oolinued

CONVICTIONS RESUL liNG fROH FELOII'{ ARRESTS t ------------------------- --------------_ .... _ ... __ ....... _ .. -- .. -------.. ------------ ... --- ------------------------- .. _-- -------------------------~--- ----------------

felony ----------------_ .... ------ -------- ... --------------- -----------------

Totd Violent other Hi sdeseanor le~6er Ol/enses TotJI --- ----------_ ..... ---------------- ---------------- .. -- .. ------------ ---------------- ----------------

cnUlm Year Nu.ber Percent N •• her Percent Ho.her Percent Nu.her Percent N •• ber Percent Hu.ber Percent --- .. - .. --------

PUTNAN 1986 I 1.0 0 .0 1.0 12 69.9 JO 29.1 10J 100.0 1985 8 B.2 2 2.1 6.2 1l 15.1 16 16.S 91 100.0

QUEENS 1986 4,B86 5l.1 I,m 19.2 J,II9 Jl.9 3,008 32.1 l,l09 14.2 9,203 100.0 1m l,m 43.9 1,281 16.6 2,115 21.3 2,849 l6.8 1,491 19.3 1,139 100.0

RENSSELAER 19B6 9J 29.2 19 6.0 74 23.2 177 55.S 49 15.4 m 100.0 1985 m lB.O 37 11.1 B9 . n.8 m 51.9 27 S.I m 100.0

RICHHOND 19B6 2BI 28.0 125 12.5 156 15.5 m 47.1 250 24.9 1,004 100.0 1985 266 21.5 118 H.1 12B 11.2 m 51.1 204 21.1 967 100.0

OJ RomANO 19B6 m 56.5 50 •• 247 41.0 117 l3.7 52 9.9 526 100.0 I "v U1 1905 m 59.1 59 10.4 m 4B.1 l1l lO.S 59 10.4 567 100.0 --..I

S1. LAWRENCE 1986 4.2 1.1 3.2 so 04.2 II 11.6 95 100.0 1985 4.3 .0 4.3 5~ 85.5 1 10.1 69 100.0

SARATOGA 1986 64 19.2 21 4.B 63 14.4 219 63.7 75 11.1 418 100.0 1m e6 22.1 )v 7.1 S6 14.4 218 61.2 65 16.1 309 100.0

SCHENECTADY 19B6 131 3l.1 35 D.s 102 24.6 239 51.1 1D 9.2 414 100.0 1m m 41.1 41 11.0 lIS 31).1 m 51.9 24 6.4 m luO.O

SCHOIIARIE 1986 lO 35.1 2.4 2ij 32.9 48 56.5 B.2 B5 100.0 1985 26 41.1 13.6 18 lv.S 29 49.2 6.8 ~9 I~O.O

SCHUYLER 1m IB 34.6 7 n.s II 21.2 34 65.4 0 .0 52 100.0 1965 14 2L9 3 S.B II 21.2 J\ itS.4 4 1.7 52 luD.O

S:NECA 19B6 42 41.9 9.2 33' 31.1 4Y 50.0 1.1 98 100.0 1965 16 32.0 2.0 15 )0.0 )2 64.u U 50 IC,O.O

SIEUDEN 1986 10 40.0 9 5.1 61 34.9 100 57.1 2.9 175 100.0 19B5 59 3U 14 9.4 4S lO.2 85 51.0 l.4 IH 100.0

SUffOLK 19B6 1,555 42.1 505 13.9 1,050 28.9 1,417 39.0 666 IB.l 3,63B 100.0 19B5 1,6iO 44.3 570 15.1 1,IuO 29.1 1,38S 36.1 119 19.1 3,114 100.0

------~-------------------------------------.. -------- .. ------------------------------- ... ------------------------ .. ----_ .. _------------------------------------------------------------------.. -------

I Continued 00 oul p.qe. I

TABLE 58 mOllY, HISOEHEAIIOR, AIIO LESSER OFHtl5E [OIiVIClIONS RESULTING fROH FElOlIY ARHSTS 1I1DULTS OHm BY COUNTY fO~ 1985 AND 1~86 - Continued

CONVICTIONS RESULT lUG fRO" FElOlIY ARRESTS. ------------------------- .. ---.. -_ ... _--------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------

Felony ------------- ... ----------- .. __ ... ----------------_ ...... -------.. ---------

Total Vi 01 ent Other HlsdeoeanDr lesser Offenses lotal ---------------- ---------------- -- .. ------------- ---------------- --------..... ------ ----------------

COUIIIY Year Nuabfr Percent Nuaber Percent Husber Percent Hu.ber Percent Huaber Percent Nu,ber Percellt - ... ---- ...... ----- ------- -------

SULLIVAN 1986 117 l2.5 26 1.2 91 25.l 198 . 55.0 45 12.5 lbO 100.0 1905 126 31.6 19 5.1 101 Jl.9 166 49.6 41 12.0 m IOG.O

TIOGA 1986 55 47 •• 6.0 48 41.4 56 • 48.l 5 4.l 116 100.0 1~85 46 48.9 U 17 39.4 4b 4R.9 2 2.1 94 IOG.O

IOMPKINS 1986 45 41.3 Il 11.9 l2 29.4 61 56.0 2.8 109 100.0 1ge5 18 49,7 ~O 17.7 58 ~6. 9 71 ;U I.] lSI l,jO.O

ULSTER 1986 Il1 29.5 36 1.B 101 21.8 273 58.8 54 11.6 4£4 100.0 !925 110 39.1 39 U 1]1 3CJ.~ 226 52.1 36 O.B m 16&.0

OJ WARREN 1986 lO !l.6 11 5.0 19 8.6 166 15.1 25 11.1 221 100.0 I Ul 1985 30 16.8 6 ].4 24 1l.4 Il2 73.1 11 9.S 119 IOO.1i OJ

WASHINGTON 1986 10 22.2 5.2 2l 11.0 96 11.1 6.1 115 100.0 1965 H 35.2 l.2 40 12.0 75 60.0 4.0 125 160.0

WAYNE 1986 91 41.9 23 10.6 6B 31.l 115 51.0 II 5.1 217 100.0 1985 95 40.6 16 6.8 79 n.B 134 51.3 5 2.1 231 100.0

WESTCIIESTER 1986 1,043 l8.5 16B Il.6 m 24.9 1,456 53.7 212 1.0 2,711 100.0 1935 1,261 45.6 515 19.] l2b n.2 1,111 47 .4 195 7.0 2,7b1 IM.O

NYOHING 1986 26 41.9 6.5 22 l5.5 l5 56.5 1.6 62 100.0 1985 28 40.0 2.9 26 37.1 41 5B.6 1.4 70 100.b

YATES 1986 32 62.7 11.6 23 45.1 19 37.3 .0 51 100.0 19a5 37 75.5 10.2 l2 65.1 II 22.4 2.0 ~9 IOG.O

HEW YORK STATE 1986 l5,690 39.3 !l,b71 15.1 22,019 24.3 39,198 4].2 15,850 11.5 90,738 100.0 1m ~:I :69 36.2 13,26l 14.9 19,025 21.3 39,976 H.e 16,942 19.0 89,207 10G.0

NEW YORK CITY 1986 24,564 39.4 10,426 16.7 14,138 22.1 25,Ill 40.] 12,120 20.4 62,418 100.0 JIlES ~IJ,geO 31.3 9,8(16 16.P. lI,m IB.3 25,932 42 •• 14,203 23.2 61,1 i5 IOb.1i

... ~ - ... --_ .. ------ -- ........ --- ------ .... ------ .. _----- .. ------ .. --_ ... ----- --- ------ --- -------- --------- -- -------- --_ .. -------- -- ........ -_ .. -_ .. --- .... ~--------_ ...... -_ .. ----------------------------------- .. --- -------,I OIS?Osltlon data are ba~cd on the year of sentencing for cor..idlons.

!iOURC£: Ins DIvision 01 Cn=inal Jusltce SerVIces, Arrests and Processing lrends File.

T~BlE 6A 5lNIENCES AS A PERCEN' Of TOTAL CONVI[!ION5 (AoUlIS ONLY) BY SENTENCE TYPE AND COUNIY fOR 1985 AND 19B6

SENTENCES AS A PERCENT Of lOTAl CONVICIIONS ------ .. _ ....... __ ..... _-------- -----------------_ .... --_ ... _-- --------------------------- --------------------------- -- .. ------- ... ------_ ...... _------ ----------.. ---------------- ---------------

local hil COUNTY Year Slale Prison loc41 Jail and Probalion Probation fine~ Other lotal -------------- -- .. -------_ .. ------------ ------------- -----_ .. _---- ------------ ------------ ------------

ALBANY 1986 3.7 15.4 o.l 12.8 53.4 6.5 100.0 l~e5 3.7 12.8 1.b Il.l 51.8 4.1 100.0

ALLEGANY 198& 1.1 10.1 9.3 21.6 44.4 13.4 100.0 1985 1.4 10.5 6.4 11.1 50.0 14.5 100.0

BRONi 1986 9.1 40.4 l.O 8.2 25.7 13.7 100.0 1985 1.7 39.8 1.5 8.5 23.1 10.B 100.0

BROOME 198& 3.5 1l.0 l.B 1l.4 34.8 JD.6 100.0 1985 3.2 14.5 3.1 12.2 36.1 30.l 160.0

o:J CA T1ARAUSUS 1m 1.2 12.6 2.1 9.3 64.6 10.2 100.0 I 19B5 1.4 14.7 1.9 1.1 64.1 10.4 160.0 U1

lD

CAYUGA 1986 6.2 19.3 1.7 5.3 46.0 19.3 100.0 1m 3.1 17.4 3.9 l.9 47.7 24.0 IliO.O

CHAUIAUQUA 1m 1.3 1l.9 5.7 10.6 52.4 16.1 100.0 1985 1.9 12.5 4.1 11.5 55.8 14.2 160.0

CHENUNS 1986 7.2 U.B 5.0 10.9 39.0 IS.3 100.0 1985 6.3 12.7 4.6 16.0 fl.3 16.3 160.0

CIIENAI/GO 1986 1.3 12.0 4.2 11.6 49.0 21.0 100.0 1985 1.5 11.4 4.9 15.1 44.9 22.3 100.0

CLINTON 1986 2.7 13.0 2.0 13.4 52.6 16.3 100.0 1985 1.9 12.6 2.1 7.7 62.4 1l.3 160.0

COLUHBIA 1986 4.6 20.3 J.9 9.3 53.6 B.4 100.0 1985 5.7 19.2 5.0 7.7 53.0 8.7 16u.0

COR lLANO 1986 2.3 14.9 4.2 12.5 54.5 11.6 100.0 19ii5 2.1 11.7 2.7 lJ.l 58.7 10.9 10~.0

DELAWARE 1986 .4 12.4 3.6 9.9 52.1 21.5 100.0 1985 .6 9.5 4.4 8.8 55.1 21.0 100.0

----------------------------------.. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( Continued on ned page. I

It1BLl bk 5lNIE~CES AS A ~EkClNr Of lOlAL CONVICTIONS CAOULlS OUlYI OY SENIENCE lYrE AND COUNn fOR 1985 AHD'1986 - Continued

SENIENCES AS A PERCENI OF JOTAL CONVICTIONS .- ... ------.. -------------- ... _-_ ..... _----------_ .. -------- ---------_ .. _ .. _-_ .. _----_ .. _ ...... ------------------... _------- --...... --_ .. ------_ .. --_ .. _------ --------------------------- ..... _---- .. -------

Locjl Jul (DUm Yedr State f'rison local Jail and Probjhon Probation Fines Other Total ~------------- _ .... --------- ------------ .. _---..... _ .. - ... -- ----... _------ --- ... -------- ------------ ------------

OUICIIESS 19B6 1.9 15.9 4.3 11.5 51.3 9:1 100.0 1m 2.2 14.0 5.5 11.1 59.1 6.0 100.0

ERIE 1966 3.1 17.5 1.1 13.5 40.1 21.9 100.0 1985 3.1 IB.3 2.6 1l.5 4~.1 22.3 100.0

ESSE I 1906 1.2 B.B 2.1 1.4 61.B IO.S 100.0 19B5 1.9 7.2 1.9 9.6 62.9 11.5 l(iO.O

FRANKLIN 1986 .9 13.6 5.2 1.1 58.1 14.5 100.0 1985 1.9 13.1 l.9 Il.II 49.S 10.1 100.0

CD fUll ON 1986 3.B 12.B 5.4 10.1 41.B 20.1 100.0 I

1ge5 5.0 1l.2 S.l 12.3 49.6 1406 100.0 m 0

6ENESEE 1966 .4 6.6 9.4 IB.I 54.8 10.6 100.0 1995 3.2 0.0 0.0 21.B 49.3 9.6 100.0

6REENE 19B6 2.1 12.5 2.1 7.5 65.4 9.& 100.0 1985 1.9 12.1 .7 9.0 67.7 B.4 100.0

HAMILlON 1986 2.6 7.9 2l.7 7.9 52.6 S.l 100.0 1985 2.7 16.2 .0 5.4 56.B 18.9 100.0

HERKIMER 19B6 1.0 15.1 1.9 5.2 62.4 14.5 100.0 1985 1.5 14.4 2.2 6.0 60.6 14.6 100.0

JEfFERSON 1986 4.5 14.9 5.8 '13.2 52.5 9.2 100.0 m5 2.9 H.4 7.5 10.0 55.0 9.1 100.0

KIN6S 1986 10.1 28.1 4.1 8.1 21.2 2B.2 100.0 1985 9.4 25.6 4.1 9.8 27.9 23.0 100.0

LEWIS 1986 5.1 6.1 Ib.l 15.l 42.9 14.1 100.0 1905 1.3 B.I 5,0 15.0 56,3 14.4 IGO.O

LIVIN6S10H 1986 2.0 10.1 5.2 9.4 54.0 19.0 100.0 19B5 1.2 9.2 6.0 7.B 50.1 lbob 101i.0

--- .. ------------------------.. -------------------- .. _ .... ------.. --_ .. _----------------------- .. ----------------------------------'------.. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------I Conli Rued on nert page. 1

TABLE bA SENlENCES AS A PERCENT Of 10lAL CONVICTlOIIS lADULTS OIlLYI BY SENIENCE TYPE AND COUNTY fOR 1905 AND 1YB6 - ContInued

SEHIENCES AS A PERCENT Of TOIAL CONVICIIONS - ...... - ... _--- ----_ ..... ------ -- _ .. --- -- ------------ .. ------- ---_ ... _- - .. _----------------- ----------- ------.. --- ------ --------_ ... ----------------- --- ------------------------ ---------------

locd J.i I CDUNlY Year Siale Prl50n local Jai I and Probation Probation fines Olher Tohl ---- .. --------- ---------... -- - ... - ...... -_ ... - .. -- ------------- ------------ ------------ ....... --------- ------------

MOlSON 190h I.l 0.1 5.0 14.1 ~7.9 1l.0 100.0 1905 2.9 B.h 5.1 n.o 61.6 0.0 100.0

HONROE 190h 6.l • 16.3 5.9 U.l ll.l 2l.0 100.0 1905 5.4 1l.0 6.0 14. ~ 3B.h 21.4 100.0

NONISOHERY 1m 1.7 10.h 2.9 10.l 59.1 14.8 100.0 1905 1.9 U 4.6 0.2 59.1 16.4 100.0

NASSAU 1986 h.2 17.0 6.1 17.6 31.3 21.8 100.0 1985 4.2 16.9 h.3 1B.l 31.1 21.l 100.0

CD NEW YORK 190h 5.9 h2.l 1.1 4.7 7.7 IB.4 100.0 I 19&5 5.2 57.5 .8 4.6 9.1 22.7 100.0 Q) .......

HIASARA 19Bh 2.2 20.2 2.4 10.1 50.1 14.5 100.0 1905 2.2 22.0 2.0 10.9 48.8 1l.3 100.0

ONEIDA 19B6 4.1 15.6 3.5 9,9 5l.0 IJ.l 100.0 1905 3.2 Ih.S 1.1 11.0 52.7 12.1 160.0

ONONDAGA 1986 7.4 16.h J.l 21.3 ll.1 20.1 100.0 1905 6.9 15.0 l.6 17.0 35.1 21.4 106.0

OHTARIO 198h :1.4 1l.2 6.1 ~.1 52.6 15.1 100.0 1905 1.6 14.B 5.0 1.7 ~S.J 12.6 100.0

ORAHGE 1906 3.1 12.9 4.J 11.7 60.5 1.5 100.0 1905 l.S 13.1 5.1 14.1 55.9 S.l 106.0

ORLEANS 1996 7.6 Il.S 0.7 19.1' 16.1 14.4 100.0 1m 6.5 11.6 IU 17 .0 14.7 15.5 100.0

OSWEGO 1986 2.6 10.7 1.1 12.0 51.4 14.2 100.0 1985 2.1 n.B 5.9 10.1 57.9 10.1 100.0

0lSE60 19B6 1.6 S.J 2.1 S.B 13.9 10.6 100.0 1965 1.2 O.h 2.4 6.2 11.9 U 100.0

I Conltnued an ned paqe. I

WLE 6A SENIENCES AS'A mCENI OF rom CONYICIIDNS IADUlIS ONLYI OV SENIENCE lYPE AND COUNTY fOR 19B~ AND 190b - Continded

SENTENCES AS A PERCEN! Of TOTAL COIIYICflON5 -----------------_ ... _---- -----_ ............ _-- .... _---------- --------------------------- -- .. - .. -------------------- .. - - .. ------------------------- -----------_ ...... _------------ ---------------

lotal J.i1 coum Yed( 5t~te Frison Loc.1 Jai I and Probation Probation rints other Total _ .............. _--_ .. - ------------ -----_ .. _---- --- .. _- .. ------ ------------ -------_ .. _-- --...... -.. ----- ------------

PUTNAM 1m .0 ~.I 1.1 11.3 19.1 1.2 100.0 198~ .b 7.2 1.1 10.B 11.1 2.6 IGO.D

QUEENS 1986 14.7 20.4 6.2 11.1 10.2 21.4 100.0 1985 9.4 14.2 3.1 10.~ 24.1 11.4 1110.0

RENSSELAER 1906 2.0 10.1 2.3 9.9 ~2.2 15.4 100.0 1905 2.3 14.2 3.J 1l.1 ~1.1 1l.9 100.G

RICHHONO 198L 1.:' 24.0 1.1 11.6 2J.I Jl.~ 100.0 1905 5.6 21.4 1.1 \l.U 32.5 25.0 10u.D

OJ RomANO 1986 6.5 1J.1 0.5 11.6 53.1 6.5 100.0 I (J) 1965 4.4 10.1 9.0 12.1 57.0 6.0 IGO.O N

SI. LAWRENCE 198b .2 6.6 1.4 4.6 62.5 24.7 100.0 1905 .1 5.9 1.2 U 61.J 2b.0 100.0

SARATOGA 1986 1.1 12.2 1.6 5.1 10.2 9.2 100.0 1985 1.2 ':.6 1.1 5.6 H.I B.l 100.0

SCHENECTADY 1986 2.6 17.J l.6 11.6 54.1 10.1 100.0 1985 2.7 IU 2.0 12.0 SU D.O 10~.G

SCHOHARIE 1986 1.4 7.0 7.6 7.0 66.1 7.6 100.0 1985 3.~ 4.l 4.1 5.1 12.1 10.6 100.0

SCHUYLER 1m. 1.1 1.1 9.B 17.4 52.2 10.~ 100.0 1985 1.4 1.0 5.5 26.6 50.0 B.l 100.0

SENECA 1966 1.4 9.5 5.6 7.0 4a.0 26.5 . 100.0 1985 1.0 11.3 5.1 8.2 51.6 20.0 I~O.O

SIEUBEH 1986 1.4 11.1 4.6 9.8 60.5 12.1 100.0 1985 2.3 10.9 U 1606 54.3 17.1 100.0

SUFFOLK 198b J.9 11.0 4.1 11.2 46.6 20.6 100.0 198~ U 9.9 5.1 11.1 55.1 11.7 100.0

------------------------------_ .. _--- ..... _------------------------- ... ---------------.. ------.. --------------.. -------- .. -------.-_ .. -------------------------- ...... _------------------------------------------------------------I Conti nued un ned page. I

OJ I

Q) w

IA~LE 6A SENIENCES AS A PERCENI Of IOlAL [OHVIClIONS (AOULlS ONLYI BY SENTEIICE IYPE AHD COUNTY FOR 198~ AND 1986 - Continued

SENTENCES AS A PERCENI OF TOTAL CONVICIIOUS -----------_ .. ----------- --...... __ .. ---_ ..... -.. ----------- --------_ .. -------... --------- --------------------------- -_ ... _----------------------- --------_ ..... --_ ... __ .. --------- ----_ ..... --------

Local Jii I COUNIY Year Stale Prison local Jail and Probalion Probilion Fines Other Tolal

-.. ---..... ------- ----- .. ------ ------------ ------------- --------- .. -- ------------ ------------ --'"'---------

SULLIVAN 1986 2.7 21.5 1.9 13.2 44.4 12.3 100.0

1985 l.S 19.7 ;.1 11.9 41.0 11.0 100.0

nOGA 1986 3.0 a.s 2.3 14.0 56.4 15.9 100.0

1985 2.0 8.1 1.0 9.9 bl.l 15.4 100.0

IOHPKINS 19Bb 2.0 6.1 1.0 0.0 61.3 20.S 100.0

1m 1.5 7.7 2.6 15.0 41.1 24. I 100.0

UL51ER 1986 2.5 Ib.I 2.5 11.2 56.7 11.0 100.0 J98S 1.0 H.S 2.8 10.1 59.1 10.5 10u.0

WARREN 1986 1.0 IU .S 6.4 61.2 15.U 100.0 1985 .5 14.0 1.9 6.2 60.0 17.4 100.0

WASHIN610H 1986 2.2 12.B 3.3 0.4 57.2 16.0 JOO.O 1985 .J 12.1 1.2 b.2 64.3 13.9 100.0

WAYNE 1m 1.2 11.' 3.1 9.6 53.1 19.0 100.0 1985 1.3 10.3 2.9 12.0 51.1 20.1 10u.o

WESICHESIER 1966 4.4 24.1 5.0 14.1 41.9 10.1 100.0 1965 6.9 16.5 4.4 15.4 47.0 9.0 10~.O

WYOMING 1986 2.0 ~.J £.6 22.1 51.B 1.1 100.0 19D5 5.1 8.7 6.2 20.0 51.0 4.1 Hli.O

vms 1986 1.0 10.3 11.5 11.5 15.9 25.0 100.0 1985 b.J 1l.2 9.0 II.B ll.l 26.4 10u.0

HEW VORK STAlE 1986 6.5 33.1 3.5 9.5 28.6 IB.D 100.0 1965 5.6 -31.4 3.1 U 11.3 18.a 100.0

NEW VORK C IlY 1986 0.5 46.1 2.7 6.9 15.2 20.4 100.0 1985 7.0 41.5 2.0 7.2 17.7 21.5 10u.0

I H,ese data reflect the lost serious sentence in .ulliple sentence dispositions le.g., sentences including A jail Ier. and A fine have been counled is "local jail"l. This distribution 01 sentence types lOy be aI/feted by Ihe underreporllng of dHposlhons to the DIVISion of Crillnal Jostice Services Isee Appendu fl.

SOURCE: HYS DiviSion of Crialnal Jostlce ServICes, Arrests and Processing Trends file.

IABlf 60 PlkUHI Of fELONY CDNVICTIDUS AND HISGlnEANDR AND LESSER DffENSE CDNVICllOHS IAOUllS ONm bY SENTENCE JYrE AND COUNlY fOR 1985 AND 1986

mUNn Ye"

ALBANY 19B6 1985

ALLEGANY 1986 1m

8ROHI 1986 I~G5

8RODME 1m ITBS

co CATTARAUGUS 19116 6-, 1985 .j:>

CAYUGA 19B6 1985

CHAUTAUQUA 19B6 1985

CHEHUNG 19B6 19&5

CHENANSO 1986 1985

ClIHION 19B6 19G5

C'OLUM8IA 1m 1m

CORILAND 19B6 l~a5

DELAWARE 1906 1985

Sill. frlson

Hlsd L Felony lesser

Con V Con v

50.2 5B.1

9.4 11.6

43.1 43.B

26.1 25.6

15.9 24.4

49.4 35.6

16.5 26.1

39.5 36.0

1B.9 39.1

l4.9 30.9

60.5 59.4

17.0 21.B

B.7 12.5

UA un

NA NA

HA HA

HA Hk

UA Hn

HA NA

HA lIil

NA NA

UA 1111

IIA Ilk

NA tl~

IIA l/Oi

lin H~

Local Jd I

HI!d • hlony Lesser

Cany Cany

1.3 16.5 1.0 Il.6

9.4 10.2 5.9 10.B

15.l 17.1 16.8 14.7

10.2 l4.l 12.0 14.7

15.9 12.4 11.1 140,6

19.8 19.3 1J.7 17.7

11.4 13.& 18.0 i2.0

11.7 1l.1 12.2 12. B

22.2 12.5 26.1 10.8

19.0 ,12.5 11.5 l1.i

18.6 20.5 14.1 19.9

2l.l 1l.7 11.1 lI.a

13.0 12.4 16.1 9.1

SENIENCES AS A PERCENI OF CONVICIIONS I

lord Jiil and Prob.tioo

Hhd' felony Lesur

COOy Conv

ll.9 25.3

11.1 29.4

n.4 7.2

21.0 21.1

1t.1 19.5

21.0 l5.6

lB.O 27.9

19.5 1t.7

J8.9 3!J.4

19.0 IB.2

11.6 17.2

21.9 IG, I

43.5 1U

6.4 6.4

6.4 4.4

.2

.1

1.2 1.1

1.1 .9

1.1 .9

2.9 2.2

2.8 2.5

J.O J.B

.5 1.1

1.2 3.7

1.6 l.u

1.6 2.9

PrnbdioQ

Hisd , felDOY Lesser

COOy Cnoy

16.3 15.3

U.B H.I

27.1 31.1

lB.4 l6.5

52.4 39.0

Y.9 11.7

22.1 25.2

2J.2 31.5

.0 4.1

25.4 30.9

9.1 6.3

12.9 40.1

17.4 11.1

12.5 1l.2

10.6 14.8

1.1 l.6

9.5 8.8,

5.B 5.2

4.6 1.0

U 10.4

IB.O 1l.2

12.1 15.5

12.4 6.2

9.1 7.B

9.5 1~.4

9.5 7.5

fioes

nisd • felnny lesser

Conv Coov

.0 51.6 .0 U.B

1.1 50.0 .6 5U

.2 32.5

.2 28.8

2.5 39.8 .0 41.1

1.6 69.7 .0 6B.l

.0 52.1

.0 52.2

J.1 56.6 2.7 60.0

1.6 47.J 2.0 52.0

.0 50.B

.0 46.7

1.6 56.9 l.6 66.2

.0 5B.O l.1 59.1,

.0 62.4

.0 65.0

.0 54. Y 4.2 58.4

Other Tolal

nisd l nisd , Felooy Lesser Felooy Lesser

CnAv Coo v Conv Can v

.3 6.9 100.0 100.0

.0 5.0 100.0 100.0

1.1 14.0 100.0 100.0 .0 15.B 100.0 106.0

.7 11.2 100.0 100.0

.9 22.1 100.0 100.0

1.6 35.1 100.0 100.0 3.4 34.1 100.0 100.0

.0 11.0 100.0 100.0

.0 11.1 100.0 10~.O

.0 22.1 100.0 100.0 1.4 26.2 100.0 100.0

2.5 11.J 100.0 100.0 .0 IU 100.0 100.0

1.6 IB.l 100.0 100.0 1.5 IU lIiO.O loa.o

.0 21.1 100.0 100.0

.0 2l.2 100.0 loo.n

.0 17.7 100.0 100.0 1.8 14.1 1(10.0 100.0

.0 9.1 100.0 100.0

.0 9.6 100.0 100.0

4.1 12.1 100.0 100.0 2.0 11.8 luO.O 160.0

17.4 21.1 100.0 100.0 .0 22.1 100.0 100.0

-- - .. -- -- -_ .. ---- - ------------ ..... -- ---------- ------ ---------------_ .. ------------------------------------- -------- --------_ ... _----- -- -- --- --------------- -- -- ---------- ------ ------------------ -- -- -------'--- -- -- -- -- ---_ .. ---------1 Conlloll.d 011 OHI p~qe. I

IHBLE bB

roum

DUTCHESS

ERIE

ESSE I

fRANKLIN

OJ fUlTON I

(J)

tIl

GENESEE

GREENE

HAhlLlON

HERr.IHER

JEfFERSON

KIHGS

LEWIS

LIVINGSTON

PERCENI OF fELONY CONVICJlONS f,NO hlSDEhEANOR AND L[SSEk OfFENSE tOllvlCIIOHS (ADULlS ONLY I DY SENTENCE lYrE hUG tOum fOk 1905 HND 19Bb - Conllnu.d

Year

1906 1905

1986 1985

1986 '1905

1m 1965

19B6 1905

19B6 1m

190. 1965

1996 19B5

1986 (9B5

198. 1~&5

1986 1985

1986 19B5

1986 19B5

Stile Pri son

ni~d & hi any Le~5er

Cony Can.

20.5 20.6

41.1 39.6

20.0 l6.1

1l.6 n.B

45.5 41.2

4.3 21.1

n.l 30.B

11.1 l3.1

14.1 22.2

23.6 11 • .1

52.3 .9.4

21.7 16.1

IB.O 11.7

HA NA

HA M

NA NA

NA NA

HA NA

NA' IIA

UA NA

NA N~

HA UA

UA 11K

HA UK

UA UA

UA NK

lotal Jd I

Hi5d • felony Lesser

Cony Con.

9.2 B.9

11.1 14.0

16.0 9.1

1l.6 11.9

11.4 14.1

1.4 3.9

1l.1 26.9

.0 66.1

26.5 22.2

lb. I 19.1

9.7 B.l

1l.0 16.1

19.0 21.2

16.6 15.5

17.9 IB.l

B.4 1.1

1l.6 1l.5

12.9 13.0

7.2 B.6

12.4

II.' 10.1 11.0

14.! 13.9

14 •• 11.5

32.6 29.6

4.0 1.. 9.2 B.O

SENTENCES AS A PERCENI Of CONVICTIONS'

Lotal Jail and Probation

Hisd • felony luser [on. Con.

27.1 32.9

11.3 10.4

20.0 9.1

43.2 21.4

29.5 25.0

61.3 19.0

24.4 1.8

17.8 .0

26.5 19.'

21.6 35.9

17.1 19.0

56.5 n.3

2a.0 4S.2

2.1 2.2

2.1 2.~

1.0 I.~

2.3 2.4

l.1 2.6

l.O 3.3

.4

.5

6.9 .0

.2 1.0

1.6 I.B

.9

.B

4.0 2.1

2.4 1.9

Prnbation

"lsd l felon~ les5er

Cony Cony

42.B 37.0

27.1 1U

40.0 45.5

29.5 40.5

1J.6 11.6

28.6 12.5

26.1 H.6

11.1 .0

23.~ 10.6

11.2 25.2

19.0 21.3

0.1 n.l

14.0 11.3

0.1 7.9

12.4 11.7

S.4 A.1

6.0 10.6

9.B 11.5

16.9 20.2

5.S 7.' 6.9 5.9

1.9 5.1

9.1 B.O

5.2 1.1

11.3 U.S

6.4 1.~

fines

ni~d 1 felony Lesser

Cony Con.

.0

.0

.S

.9

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0 1.5

.0

.0

2.2 l.B

.0

.0

B.B 5.6

2.5 1.5

.0 1.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

63.1 66.0

44.0 43.4

65.6 66.!

62.4 54.0

52.2 56.!

61.2 . 56.S

10.9 11.9

69.0 61.B

66.1 64.5

64.2 65.1

26.2 34.2

56.0 60.0

60.B 62.7

Olher

ni~d • Felony • Lesser

Cony Cony

.4

.6

.5

.8

4.0 .0

.0 2.4

.0

.0

1.4 .Il

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.8

.4

.6

.0

.0

1.0 1.6

10.0 U

23.6 24.1

n.1 1605

15.6 19.5

21.9 16.6

11.1 II.~

10.5 0.9

6.9 2~ ••

15.5 15.6

11.4 11.0

!S.I 20.2

IB.1 15.5

21.! 17 .0

ioial

nisd • felony Lesser

Cony Cony

100.0 100.0 100.0 106.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 160.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.~

100.0 100.0 106.0 100.~

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 IM.O 101l.0

100.0 100.0 1(10.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 IIiO.O 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------...... _----------------- .... ------------------------------------------------------ ... ---------------------------------------------------- .. ------------------I [onlll,u.d un nell p.q~. I

co I

()) ())

lA~LE bO fERCENI OF fELONY CUHVICIION, AIID MISDEMEANOR AND LESSER OFfENSE COHVICIIOHS IAOULT5 DNLYI &Y SENIEHCE rifE AND CDUm fOk 1905 AND 1986 - CDnltnued

COUNlV lear

"ADISON 1966 1965

"ONROE 1966 1935

n0H]60nERY i 966 1965

NASSAU 1966

NEW YORK

NIAGARA

ONEIDA

ONOIIDAGA

ONIARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

OISEGO

1m

196& 1955

1996 1965

198& 1m

1986 19&5

198& 1985

1986 1'185

1966 1905

1966 1985

1m 1m

51.le fri5Dn

"I~d l felDnr Lesser

CDnv Cony

11.6 21.6

15.1 35.9

20.0 11.1

~o.a l5.6

lB. Y 48.l

47.4 l8.5

1£.5 30.2

10.6 32.9

18.1 2b.B

lO.l 28.0

.S.O 21.l

21.7 20.\)

12.4 22.1

NA IIA

HA HA

NA H~

HA NA

NA IIA

HA IIA

HA NA

NA II~

HA H~

IIA II.

HA Hn

HA HA

liP. HA

LDC.I J.II

"Isd L felony Lesser

Cony Con.

10.6 11.4

Il.J 11.5

16.4 11.6

IJ.~ 11.5

20.2 20.8

17.0 21.3

12.4 16.1

14.2 18.6

22.1 21.9

0.1 5.0

6.7 ... 10.2 15.0

0.1 11.1

7.9 0.2

16.9 14.2

10.! 9.6

11.6 17.1

60.0 62.0

20.1 21.9

16.0 IU

11.1 14.1

11.1 12.1

11.4 IU

14.'1 15.3

10.0 13.7

5.1 0.'

SENI£NCES AS A fERCENI OF CONYICIIOHS I

LDCd J.i1 .nd ProbAtion

nisd L felony Lesser

Cony Cony

37.9 21.3

2].9 21.0

23.6 31.8

25.5 25.1

1.9 6.l

5.2 1.6

22.0 23.7

11.8 12.9

2B.4 20.7

29.2 2U

1S.0 41.9

11.9 40.B

21.0 11.1

1.1 1.6

2.0 2.1

1.0 .9

2.5 1.7

.2

.1

2.1 2.7

.9 1.1

1.1 1.2

I.J 1.1

1.5 2.1

5.~ 4.9

1.B I.B

1.4 .6

PrDbdion

"Isd 1 felony lesser

Cony Con v

lb.' 1l.S

26.5 21.1

lO.2 31.9

11.0 22.6

2I.B 22.9

21.1 11.1

21.0 20.8

lU ll.5

25.B 21.2

10.7 19.1

21.1 ll.1

28.0 21.1

29.1 29.5

12.5 9.1

11.6

fl.' 7.7 5.1

17.6 11.7

2.4 2.'

9.9 9.6

7.1 9: 7

15.4 11.7

5.6 5.0

9.6 10.6

19.0 lI.a

10.0 B.B

4.6 5.u

Fines

"Isd • Felony l05ser

Cony Conv

.0

.0

.1

•• I.B 2.9

1.0 1.3

.3

.J

AU 11.l

40.6 45.4

65.0 66.0

36.7 15.1

0.7 10.2

1.5 52.4 .0 51.1

.0 60.0

.5 59.0

.6 40.1

.4 44.4

2.2 64.0 1./ 6b.3

.4 67.1

.0 63.8

.0 43.1

.0 l7.l

.0 59.9 1.7 64.6

.0 17.9

.0 75.8

Other

nisd & Felony le5ser

Conv Conv

1.5 2.1

.9 1.1

.0 1.4

1.5 .1

1.0 1.2

1.5 .6

.4

.5

1.1 1.0

l.1 1.1

1.1 1.1

.0 1.4

1.' .8

2.7 2.3

H.2 9.0

20.8 25.0

16.1 IB.2

25.5 2b.l

20.8 25.l

15.1 IU

15.4 U.5

25.5 26.6

lB. a IU

D.2 9.t

11.1 20.1

15.6 11.2

11.0 10.2

Total

"lsd' felony Lesser

(ony Con v

100.0 100.0 luO.O 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 litO.O 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

10o.D 100.0 160.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 160.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 I~O.O 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

-------------_. -------- ... --------------------------------------------------------------_ .. _----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- .... ---------------I (onllnucd un nell piqe. I

OJ I

(J)

......

I~BLE 6B fERClur Of fElONY CONVICllOII5 AND HISDEHEANDR AND lESSER OFf£U5E CONVI[TJDHS IADUlTS OHm &Y SENIENC£ mE AHD toum fOR 1985 AND 1906 - Conllnued

COUNIY Ye.r

PUINAn 1986 1985

QUEENS 1986 19C5

RENSSELAER 1906 1905

RICHMOND 1986

ROCKLAND

1965

1986 1m

51. LAWRENCE 19B6 1985

SARA10GA 1986 19B5

5CHENECIADY 1906 1905

SCHOHARIE 1986 19.5

SCHUYLER 1906 1985

SENECA 1m 1995

mUBEU 1986 1985

SUffOLK 1906 1905

51 ilR Prison

"lsd' felony Lesser CDn~ Con.

.0 41.4

n.o 45.0

21.5 25.4

51.6 46.1

34.0 21. B

50.0 25.0

25.5 29.8

J2.6 25.9

1l.7 1209

J5.0 21.4

25.0 11.0

11.6 2J.2

29.3 10.0

HA HA

UA NA

HA NA

UA HA

UA HA

UA N,l

NA NA

NA II~

UA Nil

NA NA

HA IIA

HA NA

HA NA

Loed J.i I

",sd & felony Lesser

Cony Cony

.0

.0

7.3 9.B

16.7 14.5

3.B B.2

8.J 2.6

.0 .0

20.4 26.6

11.6 12.1

17.6 10.7

.0 14.3

16.1 11.0

II.I IB.O

10.2 12.0

5.2 1.1

31.3 40.5

1B.4 14.2

21.9 21.2

14.1 1~,4

6.6 6.0

II.B B.9

17.B 19.0

9.0 1.5

7.0 7.4

9.4 11.1

11.1 10.0

11.2 9.6

SEHI£HCES AS A PEhCEMI Of COHVlmONS •

LOCAl JAil .nd Probation

Hisd l felony Lesser

Cony Cony

.0

.0

19.3 15.2

1l.7 15.9

12.4 11.2

29.5 Jl.6

50.0 50.0

28.6 IB.I

23.9 13.3

5M 35.7

4S.0 Sl.1

11.1 60.9

lB.3 40.6

25.9 25.B

1.1 1.1

.7

.7

1.4 2.0

.2

.4

M 2.0

1.3 1.0

.4

.4

1.9 .7

2.7 1.1

6.4 2.0

1.6 .4

.·8

.9

I.~ 1.8

frDbiliuD

Mud 1 Fel ony Les~.r

Con v Cony

100.0 55.6

22.6 21.2

42.2 41.5

25.2 11.2

21.9 JI.O

.0

.0

11.1 10.2

6.2 6.2

1.4 10.0

9.7 10.5

7.0 7.1

u u

24,5 4.9 25.S 4.0

31.2 9.9 46.4 0.9

II.S 6.6 10.1 4.8

20.0 11.2 1.1 . 21.9

22.9 4.5 !l.0 1.B

31.6 7.0 15.9 10.0

24.5 11.4 21.9 11.9

fine5

Uisd • felony Lesser

Cony Cony

.0

.0

.7 1.3

.0

.1

.7 2.2

.3

.0

.0 25.0

1.0 .0

.7 1.2

.0

.0

.0

.0

2.1 .0

2.5 .0

4.1 4.B

79.4 70.0

25.S 30.B

56.2 ~B.5

26.3 36.1

66.4 10.5

62.7 61.5

71.3 11.1

5B.S 60.9

1J.4 7B.O

57.4 51.1

55.2 58.1

66.9 60.2

51.1 61.9

Other

Hisd • Felony Lesser

Cony Cony

.0

.0

.4

.6

.0

.0

.J 1.1

.0

.1

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.6

.0

.0

.0

.0

2.1 .0

.0 1.4

5.S 4.6

3.2 2.6

30.3 21.8

16.6 15.4

36.0 29.2

8.1 7.2

2..0 26.9

U 0.7

11.6 9.1

0.4 11.6

11.3 U

30.3 22.6

14.1 10.B

22.9 12.9

lolal

Hisd • felony Lesser

Cony Conv

100.0 100.0 160.6 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0

100.0 160.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

------------- ... _---------------------------------_ ... _-----------------------------.. --------------------------------------------------------------~--- .. ------------------------------------------------------_ .. _------------------I Conllnued all ne,l p'qe. I

!,Hli bll HHun !if fH~NV lOlIVICllUllS AIIO nISO[IIEi1I1fiR AND L[SSEk OffENSE [UlIVICJlOIiS IADULIS OIlLYI &1 ~£HI(NCE mE A110 [OUNIY fOR 1905 I1IID lye.

l"u:m Ye.,

SULLIVAN 196b 19u5

TIOGA 196b 1985

IOHPKINS 190b 19&5

ULSIER 19B6 19B5

Side Prison

nHd ~

f 01 OilY le.ser [onl' Cuny

25.0 11.7

21.0 20.1

25.9 21.5

10.1 26.1

NB IIA

HA 1M

HA IIA

IIA liB

lOCil jail

", sd , felony lesser

COny [on v

16.2 24.4 l2.0 2U

4.9 9.0 11.3 7.6

s.6 6.1 6.9 7.9

1l.7 16.1 10.2 15.1

SEHI£HCES AS A PERCEIII Of CflllVlmONS I

local J4i I ind Prob.1i on

n,sd 1 Felony Losser [on v [6nv

21.3 21.9

9.B ~4.5

5.6 13.1

19.6 17 .0

I.D 1.6

1.2 .1

.6 1.0

.9

.9

Prob,lioo

Hisd L felony lesser

Conv [onv

16.0 l~.l

60.1 11.1

51.9 H.I

11.6 H.7

10 •• 11.9

1.1 1.2

5.2 10.t

9.0 S.6

Fints

nisd 1 Felony Lesser

Conv . COIIV

I.~ 1.4

1.6 1.1

5.6 .0

1.3 < ..

49.6 52.6

64.5 61.6

66.0 ~4.0

61.1 66.1

Dlber lolal

ni.d L Hlsd 1 felony Lesser Felony Lesser

Con v Conv Cuny Cony

.0 U.O 100.0 100.0

.1 1l.2 I~Q.O 100.0

.0 IB.2 100.0 100.0 2.u IA.9 10~.0 100.0

5.6 22.1 100.0 100.0 5.9 26.1 ICti.O IOu.v

.1 11.9 100.0 100.0

.5 '11.8 100.0 100.0

rr W~RREN 190b 0) 19&5

33.3 18.2

NA 1M

18.2 14.1 15.2 21.1

.4 1.1

33.l 21.~

~.6 5.1

.0

.0 6l.1 61.9

.0 16.1 100.0 100.0

OJ

WASHINGlDN 1966 l~a5

WAYNE 190b 1985

~ESICHESIER 1966 "65

WYOnlNG 1906 1985

IAIES 1906 1905

NEW YORK SIATEI986 1'185

NEW YORK C 1lY 1906 1995

35.1 4.2

12.6 13.7

11.9 4~.2

1l.1 3U

17.1 23.1

41.1 11.9

48.9 47.2

UA Nil

HA IIA

NA IIA

NB Nil

HA 11.1

IIA liB

HA IIA

10.1 11.5

23.5 12.1 U.S 9.1

18.112.9 11.1 9.7

9.1 26.6 U 10.9

20.0 6.0 15.2 1.4

11.4 9.9 12.8 1l.3

11.1 1l.9

n.l II.B

16.6 11.0

53.1 49.1

11.1 12.5

26.0 21.8

25.4 11.2

26.1 2 •• 2

42.9 25.6

17.2 15.6

11.1 11.1

2.5 2.4

.6

.1

1.1 I.B

1.0 4.9

2.5 2.9 .

1.1 1.2

.4

.4

~6.5

39.6

1B.6 11.9

32.5 36.8

40.0 27.1

28.6 1~.9

24.4 26.6

22,6 25.0

1.2 1.1

6.5 9.0

11.1 11.0

19.2 18.5

9.1 2.9

6.9 1.2

1.6 1.1

.0

.0

4.7 1.1

.5

•• .0

l.O

.0 2.b

.B

.9

.5

.1

61.1 69.9

59.0 ~8.6

48.6 56.1

63.5 64.2

46.J H.B

13.5 36.0

IB.3 20.1

.0 11.9

.0 17.0

.0 15.1

.0 21.0

.9 22.1

.1 11.1

.1 11.1

.0 B ••

.0 4.9

.0 32.2

.0 36.2

1.0 1.1

.7

.9

21.9 21.5

i'i,A 25.1

lilO.O 10&.0

I~O.O 100.0 100.0 100.0

(00.0 100.0 lOO.O 100.0

100.0 100.0 hiO.O 10u.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 10U.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 IOO.~

1ii0.0 16U.O

:00.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

... -~----------------------------------------.. ------------------------------------------------------.,----------------------------... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I Ihe .. dd. rellect lite Iud •• rious senlence In lulliple senlEnce dlspo~illons le.g., sentences including a j.1l lerl and, fine b.ye been counled is 'Iocal iall·)' Ihl~ dlSlrtbution 01 sentence type. oar b.

_11"led by the und<treporllR9 01 dispOSitions to lhe DiviSion ~f [rlunal Justin Services ISeD Appendix Fl.

SOU~[£: flYS Pm"u" 01 (rlOin.1 Justice SerVIce., Arresls and Processing Trends File.

OJ

• 0'1 1.0

IABLE lA-l

COUNIY

ALBANY

ALLEGANY

BRONI

BROOME

eA TlARAUSUS

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUDUA •

CHENUHS

CHENANGO

CLINTON

COLUHBIA

CORILAND

DELAWARE

mDAllON DEPARIHEHT INTAKE, INVESTIGATION, AHD m-oISPOSlTlOH SUPERVISION RATES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND RAIE RAil~S BY COUNTY fOR 198~ AND 1m

Year

1906 1985

1986 1985

19B6 1965

19B6 1905

1906 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1965

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

INTAKE I

Rite Rank

441.1 49 456.2 50

1,196.0 20 903.7 32

523.5 45 bU.2 42

1,l64.l 15 1,388.1 12

272.0 59 36U 54

563.2 4l m.4 4l

801.2 16 051. 2 35

2,223.2 1,996.9

28e.0 56 264.2 59

1,121.4 21 1,107.0 24

285.0 57 354.8 55

3,067.5 2,861.2

1,817.4 1,546.2

Total

Rah Rank

1.159.5 1,084.7

m.l 56 m.o 50

m.B 41 ~02.1 42

BBM n 919.0 12

582.6 46 m.l 52

m.6 57 39B.2 56

B8l.! 21 005.7 21

1.230.9 1,195.B

728.0 35 820.6 20

m.5 27 025.0 19

482.1 55 551.1 41

I,OU.2 10 1,078.2 10

m.J n m.6 55

IMVESTISATloHS

fully Court

Rde Rank

196.5 IB 206.4 18

108.9 56 10.1 56

91.1 ~O

08.1 50

m.2 m.B

111.2 26 169.9 26

102.6 52 81.4 52

115.4 19 205.9 19

251.0 11 m.7 II

14.0 55 76.1 55

m.l Hl.5

Ill.4 5l 80.9 5]

213.1 12 m.3 12

20B.1 51 81.4 51

CriainAi Court

Rile

m.o 878.2

166.l m.1

546.5 m.o

m.l 621.9

411.5 3u9 ••

352.9 316.8

101.9 599.7

911.9 962.0

654.0 744.6

m.l m.b

m.! 470.3

829.1 841.9

m.l 356.2

Rank

S4 54

32 lJ

26 20

50 56

55 55

19 21

24 15

14 47

56 40

IJ 10

H 50

PRE-DISPOSITION SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED

Tgtal

Rate Rank

218.1 11 114.8 11

.0 51

.0 51

IOb.4 17 104.0 19

1.9 50 1.9 51

7.0 45 10.5 46

.0 51 I.J 52

156.5 15 153.2 1l

70.1 23 132.6 14

40.0 32 30.0 35

6.2 46 14.1 42

.0 51

.0 53

.0 51

.0 53

129.3 . 219.7

Fui1y Coud

hie Rank

15.2 21 20.8 21

.0 H

.0 H

IOU 5 100.0 5

1.9 n 1.9 4i1

1.5 41 1.2 42

.0 H .0 H

34.2 10 45.B 12

1.1 42 2.2 18

40.0 14 30.0 17

4.9 39 11.0 2B

.0 H

.0 44

.0 H

.0 H

219.1 m.7

J 2

Crilloll Courl

Rate

202.9 94.1

.0

.0

I.B 3.2

.0

.0

3.5 9. ,

.0 1.3

122.3 107.5

67.4 130.4

.0

.0

1.2 3.7

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

Rank

17 17

42 42

35 35

42 42

JO 30

40 40

14 14

10 10

42 42

34 34

42 12

42 42

42 42

------ .. --------------------------_ ...... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:.--------------------------------------------------------------------- ...

I Cuntinued on next paqe. I

CD I

-...J o

IABLE JR-l

COUNIY

DUICHESS

ERIE

ESSEI

FRANKLIN

fULTON

GENESEE

6REENE

HAHlllDN

HERY.IHER

JEFfERSON

KINGS

LEWIS

LIVINGSTON

PROBAIlON OEPARThEHI INTAKE, INVESIIGAIION, AND fhE-OISPOSIIIOH SUPERVISION RAlES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND ~AIE RANKS BY [OUNIV FLU 1985 AND 1986 - Continued

Vear

1986 1m

1986 1985

1986 198~

1986 1985

1986 1985

I~U~

1;--

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

INIAI:E f

R.te Rank

1,066.2 27 1,081.9 26

585.6 42 550.8 48

953.2 32 1,056.0 28

1,655.3 1,705.8

: m.8 51 296.0 57

I,m.l 19 I,m.o 9

1,311.2 17 ",136.0 2J

20.0 62 20.1 62

191.3 61 m.l 61

1,985.7 1,193. B

m.6 48 60B.6 44

561.3 H 556.3 45

911.3 11 756.1 36

lot.I

Rate Raok

m.J 47 m.3 41

510.0 52 580.6 45

m.1 61 316.2 59

1,470.1 1,438.6

m.1 50 649.1 19

1,215.5 l,m.3

420.4 59 m.1 61

360.0 60 140.4 62

681.1 38 484.2 50

m.5 26 m.2 28

546.0 51 521.7 ta

628.5 42 480.8 51

762.8 11 761.6 26

IHVESll6AIIOHS

Faai I y Courl

Rale Rank

m.. 17 126.2 17

7Y.9 42 110.8 42

S8.2 46 101.7 46

250.0 II m.l II

2l0.0 28 166.0 28

202.4 25 111.0 25

8S.5 60 50.6 60

20.0 62 20.1 62

301.9 10 145.1 10

68.4 57 63.2 57

70.4 58 £1.9 5a

162.1 19 123.2 39

1'3.3 21 166.3 27

Crtainal Court

Rate

m.9 506.1

450.1 46U

259.0 214.5

1,212.J 1,194.3

140.1 m.7

1,013.1 '/65.2

3l4.9 243.5

340.0 120.4

3BI. 2 139.1

788.1 m.o

416.4 m.8

466 •. 4 351. b

619.5 590.3

Rank

H 34

46 41

61 60

J 3

57 38

59 sa

58 62

53 59

15 18

11 n

H 49

27 22

fflE-DISPOSITION SUPERVISION CASES ~ECEIVEO

lotal

Rate Rank

69.1 24 50.2 21

.0 51

.0 53

13.8 42 16.5 40

52.5 29 45.7 10

12.8 U 16.2 41

226.2 10 161.3 12

m.2 B 4. 8 49

.0 51

.0 53

14.4 37 6.0 4&

.0 51

.0 53

82.6 19 68.5 25

55.3 28 123.2 15

47.8 30 25.7 38

Faaily Court

~ale Rank

40.9 Il l6.8 15

.0 H

.0 H

11.0 lO !l.B 21

13.1 25 4.6 35

12.S 28 16.2 22

11.6 26 5.1 n

U 40 4.8 34

.0 H

.0 H

6.0 34 1.0 31

.0 H

.0 H

78.4 62.5

7.9 l2 7.9 30

47.B 10 24. 0 2~

Crillnd Court

Rale

28.8 1l.3

.0

.0

2.8 2.0

19.8 41.1

.0

.0

212.6 159.2

230.4 .0

.0

.0

28.4 3.0

.0

.0

4.2 6.0

47 .4 115.2

.0 1.7

Rank

27 27

42 42

17 31

22 22

12 42

9 9

42 42

42 42

36 36

42 42

12 32

12 12

39 39

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... ---_ ..... _--------------------------------- ... ------------------------------------( Continued on ned page. I

IA~lE lA-I

COUNTY

HADISON

MOHROE

MOHTGOMERY

NASSAU

CD HEW YOR~ I

-..J t-'

NIAGARA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO

ORANGE

ORLEAHS

OS HE GO

OISEGO

fhUllllllON OEPARTH(NI INTAl:E, IHI'[STIGAIION, AHD PhE-DISPOSITION SUPERVISION RUES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND MIE RAUKS BY COUNIY fOR 1985 AND 1986 - Continued

Year

1986 1m

1986 19a5

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

19B6 1985

1986 1985

1m 1995

1996 1~85

19&6 1965

19~6

ms

1986 1985

1986 1985

, INiIlY.E t

R.te Rant

1,439.9 10 I,W.O Il

110.B J9 651.1 41

335.9 5l m,o 56

1,412,7 II I,UI,I 10

:2]9,8 5B m,o 5l

]24,l 39 962,2 lO

725,6 17 '727.9 l7

m,B 10 ',246.0 19

506,5 41 126.3 lB

1,040,5 28 1,326.B 14

1,095,1' 25 1,091.5 25

591.1 41 551.5 H

901.1 J4 m.9 19

Total

Rale nan~

B01.0 10 674.2 15

m.9 40 m.' 41

711.9 16 580.1 H

I,OlS.9 12 1,071,9 II

950,4 15 8ll. 5 18

616,4 44 661.5 l6

900.2 18 142.2 29

1,64B.5 1,150.6

B85.0 20 199.8 22

m.8 11 691.1 31

821.8 29 666.8 l7

1,320,2 l,l59.8

m.4 5B 419.1 54

IIlVESII6AT10NS

fuily Court

Rde RAnk

151,1 35 Ill,8 l5

117.1 l6 m.o. l6

255.3 11 211,J 17

160.8 23 171.6 23

48.£ 61 49.1 bI

136.5 31 l41.l 11

20l.2 29 161.9 29

201.8 14 229.7 H

104.1 4l 110,4 'U

B5.£ U 111.0 41

82,l . 54 n.£ 54

279.' 252.6

12B,4 10 I~.J 10

Criainil ~ourt

nate

m.2 m.4

5l0.2 4H.1

162.6 l69.l

81U.0 991.3

901.8 181. 9

4)9,9 520.1

691.0 518.1

1,444.1 1,220.9

1BO,9 6B8.4

61l.l 580.B

145.5 590.2

1,041.8 1,107.1

lO4.1 296.5

Hank

22 20

35 t2

45 49

II 1

10 II

19 12

20 21

16 11

2B 26

18 2l

60 57

PRE-D15POSITIOH SUPEftVISIOH CASES RECEIVED

Iotal

nate RAnt

&0.1 26 M.4 26

31.l 14 lB.2 31

S.U H Il.l 4l

l16,6 269.3

7B. J 20 99.1 20

.0 51

.0 53

70.8 22 29.1 36

241.6 m.B

5,4 48 10.8 45

111.9 16 110.6 IB

m,4 12 115.0 16

515,3 1 181.0 II

,0 51 2u3. B 9

fuily Courl

Rite Rank

.0 44 I.S U

35,1 17 J8.2 14

5.0 15 1l.1 24

5.2 11 6.2 12

41.1 II 51.0 9

.0 44

.0 44

5.6 36 2.0 !9

95.4 116.9

I. 4

.0 44

.0 H

.0 H

.0 44

5.1 J8 10.2 29

102.1 I .0 H

.0 44 ,0 44

Crilinal Courl

Rale

60.1 62.9

1,1. .0

.0

.0

111.4 263.1

31.1 46.3

.0

.0

65,2 21.1

146.2 124.9

5.4 10.B

117.9 110.6

R.nk

19 19

42 42

42 42

1 1

21 21

42 42

24 24

ii 11

28 28

Il Il

208,2 ·16 104.8 16

m.1 IOl.O

,0 2~3.a

6 6

5 5

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------------------_ .. _---------------- .. ------------------------------( Continued on nett page, I

IABLE lA-I PRObATlOH DEPARtHENt IH!AII, INYESII6AlION, AND PkE-OISPOSIIION SUPERYISION HAlES PER 100,000 POPUlAlIOU ANb RAtE RAN~S DY coum fOR U05 ANG 1~06 - Continued

IHYESTJUAIIOHS fRE-DISPOSlTlON 5UPEflVISION CASES RECEIVED ------------------ --- ... ---------.. -- .. - -------------- -_ .. _ ... _----_ ..... _---- ------------------ --------------

INJAKE • lotd fuily (ourt Crialnal tourt lotal fuily Court (rioinil Court ------------- ----------_ ..... ------- .. - .. _-- ---- .. --------- ------------- ------------- --------------

COUNTY Year Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate • Rank Rate Rank Rite Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank ----------- ... --

PUTHAH 1986 963.2 J1 m.B 48 10.4 41 m.l 30 29.4 JD 29.4 19 .0 42 1905 002.£ 1~ 496.9 H 96.4 41 4uO.S 46 10.l 12 38.1 Il .0 12

QUEENS 198£ m.9 54 m.~ 54 65.0 59 427.5 48 14.0 21 60.9 8 5.1 31 1905 m.1 52 m .• 51 51.3 59 HI.O 52 16.9 23 69.0 7 1.1 31

RENSSELAER 1986 l,m.9 IB 160.1 32 226.1 21 514.6 11 88.J IE .0 44 OO.J 18 1985 1,(Ha.5 29 125.5 JI 189.6 21 536.5 29 14.1 2. J.3 J£ 11.4 10

RICHHOND 1986 m.o 52 m.5 62 110.5 45 205.0 62 16.6 40 16.6 22 .0 42 1985 m.1 46 111.9 60 104.0 45 207.0 61 20.1 11 2B.1 19 .0 42

OJ ROCKLAND 1986 m.2 40 615.1 39 104.1 40 569.0 30 360.1 2 231.4 2 128.2 8 I -....J 1985 671.1 40 m.4 40 112.4 40 521:1 11 416.6 I 240.9 I 175.7 8 N

51. LAWRENCE 198£ 1,119.9 6 I,Ol9.0 II m.1 49 906.9 9 195.9 IJ 10.6 21 m.l 1 1985 1,413.4 II B71.2 14 96.0 49 700.3 12 191.1 10 1l.2 2~ 170.1 1

SARATOGA 1986 897.0 35 732.5 34 255.1 'IS 471.1 40 55.5 21 n .• 27 42.0 20 1985 858.1 34 107.] 32 211.5 15 193.8 36 01.8 21 35.9 16 48.9 20

SCHENECTADY 1986 1,352.9 16 B60.9 25 102 •• 24 618.4 21 273.6 12.6 29 261.0 19B5 1,21a.5 21 765.0 25 177.1 24 581.7 24 m.B 11.1 21 no.5

SCHOHARIE 198£ 291. 9 55 610.1 45 lIo.Y 11 m.8 41 1.4 49 .0 H 1.4 29 1985 215.2 58 176.5 53 137.4 31 138.9 51 10.1 47 .0 H 10.1 29

SCHUYLER 19B£ 4,092.0 1,162.1 m.l 1,005.7 11.5 H .0 It 11.5 42 1985 3,160.7 1,227.8 m.2 85 •• 6 11.4 H 11.4 26 .0 42

SENECA 1986 1,021.8 29 870.5 23 174.9 '6 501.6 36 IOU U 9.1 31 174.5 1985 1,242.2 20 729.4 10 299.1 6 m.l H 280.8 1 .0 44 28~.8 2

STEUBEN 1986 1,091.8 26 922.4 11 m.3 20 m.l 23 241.7 b 156.9 90.8 15 19B5 1,062.2 27 700.8 21 194.< 2~ 584.5 25 263.0 5 m.2 IOb.8 15

SUFFOLK 19B6 1,170.8 21 2,105.6 129.1 3B 1,970.1 41.4 31 44.4 12 .0 42 1905 1,299.1 11 2,396.4 126.2 38 2,210.3 50.0 28 50.0 10 .0 U

, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... ----------------------------------------------- ... --- ... ----------------.. ------------------------. I Continued on ned paqe. I

"mE 7A-1

COUNIY

SULlIVAN

TIOGA

rOHPKlNS

ULSTER

fk~OA"ON OEf~RJH£HI INIA~E, INVESII6ArJOH, AND PRE-DISPOSITION SUPERVISION RAIES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND RAIf RANKS BY [OUNIY fOR 1985 AND 1~86

1ear

19B6 ms

1986 1985

I~B6

1985

19B6 198~

INIAY.E I

Rile Rink

1,109.3 24 Y58.6 31

1,402.0 12 l,lu8.1 16

508.0 4b 536.6 49

I,m.t H 1,116.0 22

lolal

Rile R • .lt

I,OJl.5 13 869.8 I~

845.1 20 659.5 17

1,006.8 U 'OB8.,l Il

9l0.0 16 774.2 2\

INVE5Tl6ATlOHS

F~aily Court

hale Rank

166.2 48 94.1 48

m.1 430.1

145.4 l2 140.1 32

126.7 44 105.6 H

CriAinii Court

RAle

B61.3 715.1

500.0 420.8

161.4 741.6

SOl.l 660.6

Hank

12 13

J1 45

17 H

14 19

PRE-DISPOSITIOW SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED

Tot. I

Rate Rank

.0 51

.0 53

35.3 36 43.1 11

132.2 131.1

3 2

23.1 39 33.0 34

faoi I Y Court

nate Rank

.0 H

.0 H

23.5 20 29.B 18

6.0 33 1.1 41

.0 H

.0 H

[rioinil Court

Rale

.0

.0

lI.a 13.9

m.l 330.1

23.1 33.0

Rank

42 U

26 26

21 21

OJ WARREN 19B6 19B5

1,538.7 1,450.4

8 8

868.5 24 m.4 m .•

472.1 481.S

42 3Y

36.0 l5 36.0 16 .0 1.8

38 38 I

'-l W

WASHINGTON

WAYNE

WESTCHESTER

WYOnlHG

YAIES

HEUYORKSTATE

HEW YORr. c IIY

1986 19B5

1986 19B5

19B6 19B5

IY86 1965

19B6 1985

19B6 19B5

IY86 19B5

1,149.4 22 1,309.2 15

1,517.0 I,S9U

1,l89.6 Il 1,244.5 19

251. 9 60 216.3 60

m.8 50 m.1 51

178.9 HA 036.7 NA

389.4 HA S26.0 NA

868.1 16

512.9 49 56Y.1 46

881.0 22 153.8 27

1,494.4 1,668.9

m.6 53 661.3 30

154.1 3l 614.9 34

878.6 HA 863.' HA

611.6 UA 554.2 HA

184.5 16 213.2 16

295.5 258.1

m.s m.1

110. J 34 132.0 34

IY&.I 22 IBI.:i 22

155.0 HA m.. HA

70.1 NA 63.1' HA

108.4 m.9

586.4 495.1

651.0 m.1

3B2.4 528.6

55&.6 m.3

123.5 707.6

541.6 490.5

51 51

29 35

25 16

52 30

31 17

HA HA

HA NA

4B.5 29

14.1 41 .0 53

.0 51

.0 53

66.6 25 01.3 22

39.2 . 3l 22.1 3Y

.0 51 U 50

101.0 HA 94.9 HA

00.0 HA 00.8 IIA

46.1 II

14.1 24 .0 H

.0 44

.0 H

66.6 B4.1

9 6

36.0 15 7.4 31

.0 44

.0 H

49.6 NA 41.9 P.A

70.1 HA 67.0 NA

.0 .0

.0 .0

.0

.2

2.5 H.B

.0 4.1

51.2 47.1

9.3 1l.0

42 42

42 42

41 41

25 2S

Jl lJ

NA IlA

HA Hii

------- ... ------------------ .. --------------------------.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------T----------------------------------------------------------------------I Inta~e occurs onl y in hell y court.

IlUIE: O".allc changes in rank scores should be interpreted "ilb caution. Ihe sensitivity 01 riles to relatively sull changes in ab~olute nUlbers increases as Ihe siu of Ihe popUlation decreases. For .. ample, an Increase 01 one III in a gIVen lctlVity In a county .ilb 5,000 residenL~ .ill cause lb. Vilue 01 the Hie 10 Incr~ase by 20, "hile ~n Incruse 01 one 111 in " counly .ilh 50,000 residents .ill cause Ihe valuf of Ih'f rale 10 increase by only 100 121.

SOURCE: HYS DIVIsion 01 Probation and Corredional Allernallves.

OJ I

-...J -P>

M&LE 7A·2

COUNTY

ALBANI

ALLEGANY

BRoNI

BROOME

CAlTARAUGUS

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUQUA

CHEMUNG

CHENANGO

CLINTON

COLUMBIA

CORlLAND

DELAWARE

PRU&AIION SUPIRVISION RAlES rER 100,000 POPULAIION AND RATE RANKS B~ COUNTY FOR IYO~ AHD 1906

Yur

1m 19B5

1m 1m

1906 19B5

1m 19B5

1m 19B5

19B6 1905

1906 1985

1m 1965

19B6 • 1905

I,m 1m

19B6 19B5

19B6 19B5

19B6 19B5

PRoBAIION SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED

Told

R~l. Rank

420.1 3Bl.2

m.l 29 169.0 54

322.6 12 30u.7 16

293.6 20 292.3 18

m.9 50 186.3 40

117.7 6i 116.5 5B

277.4 26 215.3 21

m.B 3Bu.S

350.0 7 320.2 II

259.9 36 IBS.l 49

24B.B 4J 26').7 30

20U 22 293,; 17

191.1 56 IBl.' 50

faai Iy Court

Rite Rink

71.6 Il 50.4 26

51.5 27 29.5 4B

22.1 50 20.4 5S

50.1 30 51.9 lB

45.1 14 43.4 oj

26.3 55' 26.3 5u

41.3 JB 54.1 n

103.9 100.7

92.0 H.O 3,

22.2 57 31.1 H

64.3 17 54.5 21

57.0 21 50.6 24

3B.2 n 21.7 49

Cd.ina! Court

Rale

m.b 3J6.0

221.0 139.5

100.4 2BO.4

213.4 m.4

111.2 143.0

III.' 120.2

m.1 221.2

1I4.9 271.B

258.0 m.2

m.7 152.0

IB4.5 20U

230.0 212.7

152.9 ISS.7

Rink

31 53

IY 21

52 51

U 58

22 2B

5 10

16 9

20 49

45 31

21 IB

55 U

CASES UNDER PROBBTIDN SUPERVISION OURIN6 litE YEAR I

Tohl

"~h Rink

1,261.8 1,1lI.S

651.5 50' 52B.5 51

1,069.4 m.4

951.6 14 916.0 10

568.6 SO 486.1 50

406.B 62 40U 62

761.0 16 6B5.0 40

1,404.4 1,292.5

2 2

842.0 29 718.5 34

m.3 25 755.2 30

164.4 15 704.6 35

OYO.1 20 m.B H

5BB.1 56 m.o 54

Fuilr Court

Rale kink

m.l Il BO.1 2B

11.1 42 5B.Y 40

42.9 60 45.4 57

107.2 23 125.2 II

92.6 10 72.7 39

50.1 57 55.1 52

9a.5 29 102.6 n

m.2 191.1

126.0 17 B6.1 2Y

57.9 51 77.2 36

126.9 15 lOB. Y 19

101.3 27 B4.4 30

61.6 4B 55.5 51

Crulna! Court

Rile Rank

I,m.s 1,043.5

57B.2 469.5

I,m.s 950.0

BU •• m.o

4B 55

14 15

416.0 57 m.l 59

356.7 m.1

662.5 582.4

! ,101. 2 1,101.2

62 62

34 H

1 3

716.0 29 632.S 32

B05.. 19 677.9 21

m.6 40 595. 7 l~

709.0 21 193.4 14

526.5 S4 ~~I.b 51

CASES UNDER PROBATION SUPERVISION OH DECEHBER 11

latal

Rale Rink

900.6 046.2

403.2 45 175.2 55

BIB.4 152,9

700.2 15 657.1 H

40U 50 J51.6 57

286.6 62 m.2 62

529.0 3D m.o 1Y

1,04U 2 949.6 2

520.0 19 492.. J7

703.2 14 bOO.7 23

561.0 34 510.1 32

62B.1 22 601.5 21

431.4 54 m.B 52

fUily Court

Rale R.nk

63.2 14 60.6 17

31.6 41 21.6 54

2l.2 54 21. 0 S5

61.2 17 60.7 15

. 49.2 10 46.9 30

17.5 57 23.B 50

51.0 21 51.B 21

m.l 111.4

2 2

5b.0 21 3t.O 3Y

2D.9 55 35.6 31

72.5 64.1 12

H.l 31 ".1 12

JI.B 45 23.5 51

[rilinal Court

olale

m.1 185.6

445.5 m.b

m.2 731.8

639.0 596.4

156.4 104.7

Rank

5 5

46 53

17 15

57 59

26Y.! 62 245.4 61

415.2 37 m.o 4Z

m,l 8,2.2

412.0 40 150.3 13

m.l 10 565.2 I~

4BU 36 m.B 35

501.4 20 55U 20

4u5.5 51 115.4 50

-_. --------_ .. -- .. -----_ ............ ----- ... -- ... --- ... -----_ ... ---------_ ... -----_ ... -----_ ..... -_ ...... --.. ----'"'----------------_ ........ ----.. -----_ .... -- .. -_ ......... -- .... -- .... ----.. ------_ ..... ------------........ --_ ...... --------.. -.. -_ .... -_ ... ----.. ------_ .. -_ .... ----_ .. ---1 CU/Ilinued un neil paqe. I

OJ I

-..J U1

IA&l( lA-2

coum

DUICHESS

ERIE

ESSE I

fRANKLIN

FUll OM

GENESEE

GREENE

HAHILlOH

HERKIHER

JEffERSON

KINGS

lEWIS

L1VIHGSIOH

PkUDAlIOH SUPERVISIfiH RAIES PER 100,000 POPULAlION AND RAIE RANKS BY COUNIY FOR 1985 AHD 1986 - Continued

Year

1986 1985

1m 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 19B5

1m 1985

1986 1985

1m 1985

1986 . 1985

1986 1985

1m 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

fR08AIION SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED

Tohl

Rate Rank

m.o U 231.2 21

278.6 25 216.0 25

159 _8 59 110.2 59

32/:.5 II 317.4 12

260.1 15 301.1 15

394.6 m.o

219.4 . 42 m.l 60

120.0 Il 120.1 62

174.9 58 165.9 55

m.l 10 m.2 13

m.l H 211.4 35

m.4 51 202.7 45

353.2 282.9 n

Fa.ll y Court

Rah Rank

42.1 4. 50.6 25

51.] 29 41.1 30

33.1 48 10.2 41

11.1 10 5U 20

42.1 39 J4.3 42

59.5 21 67.1 8

57.0 22 36.2 40

20.0 59 20.1 57

65.8 16 lB.9 35

11.1 11 13.1

21.4 53 19.0 58

39.5 42 41.1 32

56.1 24 24.0 53

Cri.ind Courl

Rate

194.1 211.6

Rank

41 21

m.l 26 2lI.l 24

126.7 59 110.0 M

25].4 11 262.6 12

211.9 161.1

m.o m.l

192.4 101.1

100.0 Ibu.3

109.1 l21.u

261.6 241.8

219.1 221.6

17l.9 15'1.0

296.9 258.9

11 11

n 61

B 62

62 56

14 11

12 25

51 is

9 Il

CASES UNDER PROBATION SUPERVISION DURING HIE YEAR I

Total

Rate Rank

80B.D ]0 007.5 . 24

m.2 41 670.5 13

506.9 59 415.1 59

945.2 15 874.6 15

931.1 16 B60.8 17

1,111.& 1,221.7

m.l 51 576.2 52

600.0 55 682.0 11

518.~ 51 567.9 53

810.9 21 847.B 20

m.l 11 910.7 12

m.7 H 766.8 21

1,061.1 910.1

Fa.i Iy Court

Ralt Rank

88.B II 115.6 IB

100. ~ 28 81.0 32

55.1 ~2 49.5 55

IIB.l 20 121.0 11

69.6 46 46. 'J 56

120.1 19 93.1 26

11.1 41 72.1 41

60.0 50 8u.2 31

159.9 111.5

11U II 124.2 12

46.6 5a 19.9 59

102.6 . 26 155.0 5

18.5 1B 56.6 S6

Criainal Court

Rate Rank

120.0 691.9

20 25

421.1 U 589.5 42

451.B 58 m.2 S8

82U 11 753.5 IB

864.5 BIl.9

1,210.9 1,134.6

12 II

2 2

551.1 M Sul.9 52

540.0 51 601.8 37

418.5 m.4

134.0 123.6

910.3 810.8

588.9 631.8

981.6 m.8

60 56

26 22

10 10

41 Jl

-

CASES WIDER fROBATlON SUPERVISION ON DECmER 11

lohl

R.le Rink

588.4 28 571.5 21

m.7 55 m.1 48

m.¥ 59 l4A.S S8

682.6 11 62B.b IB

610.3 18 664.1 Il

m.t. 1 941.5 J

415.1 51 118.5 51

460.0 49 280.8 61

45\.4 ~2 403.5 5i

511.3 29 54U 29

144.1 9 734.6 10

502.0. 42 18u. S 3S

m.s 10 709.8 II

faaily Court

R.le Rink

50.2 28 42.1 35

52. B 25 50.4 26

21.5 49 22.0 53

41.9 31 54.8 20

29.1 41 21.1 41

62.9 15 69.4 9

42.8 16 It.s 62

20.0 56 40.1 36

m.6 94.1

56.3 29 66.6 11

24.3 52 20.1 50

41.4 31 61.6 14

54.6 21 18.9 59

Criaind Court

Rale Rank

538.2 27 528.8 23

IBM 51 391.6 48

314.4 58 321.5 55

m.l 18 571.2 18

641.0 m.1

916.7 872.1

14 Il

1 2

172.9 51 1bU 51

440.0 48 240.1 62

325.9 60 309.3 51

521.0 m.2

719.1 71U

28 29

454.5 H 417.2 45

668.9 690.9

II 10

------------ --- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --.. -------- ---------- ---- ... --... -I Continued on, nut page. I

co I .....

0'1

I!lBLE 7A-2

[oum

HADISOH

HONROE

HONTGOnERY

NASSAU

NEW YORK

• NIAGARA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

OTSEGO

PROBAIION SUPERVISION RAIES PER 100,000 POPULAIION AND RAIE RAHKS BY [DUm fOR 19B~ AND 1906 - Continued

Yelr

1986 19B5

1986 1985

1986 1955

1906 1m

1906 1985

1906 1905

1906 19B5

1986 I'iB5

1986 .Im

1986 1985

1m 1985

1996 1905

1986 1965

I'ROOATIOH SUPE~VISION CASES RECEIVED

101 ..

R.I. Rank

11M 16 257.7 II

m.o If m.1i 20

228.4 49 241.B 37

140.1 363.1

211.4 52 20U 14

m.2 27 270.5 24

251.9 3D 219.4 42

m.5 15 m.4 2J

101.7 10 263.0 ~9

lOU 17 345.9 7

262.2 J4 12l.9 10

286.0 21 25B.5 11

135.1 62 150.3 56

fa.i1y Courl

R.h Rank

11.5 51 24.0 54

32.5 49 31.9 11

11.0 14 59.0 16

35.4 46 45.4 29

11.0 60 IB.3 59

19.6 41 39.0 lb

4Y.S 31 16.J 19

48.1 32 41.1 20

59.7 20 57.4 19

14.1 J6 48.6 21

51.4 20 30.7 46

61. 9 19 61.1 9

1.7 62 15.2 62

Cri Ilnal Court

Rate

279.1 m.l

286.5 251.1

157.1 182.8

301.7 311.7

196.4 108.9

R.nk

II 22

10 15

54 42

10 10

236.5 21 m.7 19

200.5 JB 101.1 II

m.l 13 235.1 20

244.0 18 205.7 12

260.9 291.2

210.0 291.3

224.1 191.4

Ill. 4 141.2

15 6

15 1

10 14

58 50

CASES UNDER PROBATION SUPERVISION DURING IIIE YEAR I

lold

Rde R.nk

m.l 31 6B6.2 J9

952.6 13 029.8 23

m.2 J1 694.9 10

1,111.6 1,021.1

001.1 22 849.7 IB

m.e 40 654.5 46

766.2 34 7JO.2 31

86S.1 24 701.1 29

806.9 11 740.4 11

899.5 19 B71.3 16

1,179.9 1,126. ]

798.5 12 m.B II

665.5 49 672.1 42

fUlly Cuurt

nate Rlnk

52.6 56 S8.4 19

78.4 J9 75.2 lO

126.7 16 108.5 20

88.1 34 102.2 24

17.1 62 38.0 61

69.6 45 62.4 44

77.3 40 12.6 10

U.l 3\ 01.0 31

107.1 22 92.0 27

m.4 12 122.9 Il

102.0 25 71.5 42

m.8 14 m.7 0

54.1 55 59.0 47

eriain" Court

Rale Rank

732.7 27 m.o 34

874.2 II m.b 11

617.6 41 586.1 Il

I,OOl,1 910.9

81l.8 811.6

15 12

654.2 3S 592.2 41

688.9 32 m.6 28

711.4 22 7u2. J 24

699.6 11 640.4 10

167.1 750,5

1,077.1 1,055.2

669.7 60u.1

611.5 613.1

23 19

1 5

lJ 10

II 35

CASES UNDER fROOAT]ON SUfERYISION ON DECEHBER II

Totil

Mate Rank

605.1 25 m.s 41

6&1.0 20 m.6 17

566.2 3l 521.5 31

899.6 826.3

686.3 16 666.9 12

45~7 50 4~.5 47

m.. l7 SOl.] 15

600.4 24 552.7 28

569.4 10 501.2 36

641.1 21 602.7 22

706.9 12 909.6 4

514.3 36 514.5 31

406.5 44 528.9 10

fuily Courl

Rate Rank

25.5 50 21.0 56

~0.7 40 45.8 31

51. B 21 55.1 19

42.9 15 52.4 23

12.7 61 20.3 S7

24.9 51 30.0 45

31.4 42 27.5 46

44.9 33 41.0 14

bl.O 16 47.6 29

08.7 8U

12.9 60 40.5 2B

71.1 II 67.1 10

11.8 62 52,2 24

Cn.tul Court

Rate Rank

519.& 21 452.5 16

620.1 19 585.8 17

514.4 31 460.1 12

85&.7 71J.9

613.6 646.7

II 12

m.B 50 418.5 44

m.o 15 m.2 11

563.5 2J SOU 26

507.6 11 4~t.6 J4

552.4 511.8

m.1 861.0

25 25

413.2 19 411.4 30

471.7 18 lib. 7 30

---_ ...... -_ .. _ .............. --_ ... -- .... -_ ........ ---_ .... -- ..... -----_ ..... -_ .. ------_ ..... -_ .... -_ ..... --------------------------... ------------_ .... ---_ .. _':.. .. --------.... ---------------.. -_ .. ---_ .. -----------_ .. ---------------_ ... ------------.. -_ ...... -- ....... ------_ ..... .. t Conlu,u..! on ne,1 page. I

OJ I

" "

I~&Ll lil-2

COunlY

fUINAM

QUEEHS

RENSSELAER

RICHMOND

ROCKLAIIO

SI. LAWRENCE

SARAIOGA

SCHEIIEClAOY

SCHOHARIE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

SIEUBEH

SUFFOLK

PRObATION SUPERVISION RAIES PER 100,000 PDPULAIION AND RAIE RANKS or COUNIY FOR 1985 AND 19B6 - Continurd

Year

19B. 1905

1906 1905

19D6 19B5

1m 1965

1906 19D5

190. 19B5

19B6 19B5

1m 19B5

1986 ·1?B5

19B. 19D5

190. 1905

19B6 1m

19D6 1905

fROOAIiON SUPERVISION CASES RECEIVED

lold

R.te kank

259.B 37 219.7 34

m.l 55 112.0 51

210.9 30 330.4 9

110.7 60 116.9 61

26B.9 12 m.o 8

186.2 51 156.1 51

201.8 '51 171.3 52

271.. 2B 266.1 28

255.0 \I 111.9 51

Ih5.5 m.l· )

246.1 15 192.1 47

211.1 11 201.1 l6

JIB. 5 316.3 II

F •• jJ y Court

R.le Rank

31. J 17 58.1 17

1S.6 61 11.0 60

B4.4 11.0

25.1 56 21.3 52

91.8 125.9

17.2 45 16.B bI

52.4 26 35.9 \I

41.6 17 5U Il

26.8 51 20.1 5b

74.1 0 62.B II

71.1 J.2 51.9 21

53.1 25 32.9 45

11.5 9 66.2 10

Cd.iul Court

hate

225.5 191.6

116.1 155.0

186.6 256.1

lIS. 6 m.6

117.1 m.o

Rank

29 35

4B 48

H 14

60 59

47 29

14B.9 51 139.1 54

152.1 111.4

229.0 206.5

22B.2 151.7

390.B m.6

171.5 140.4

56 55

21 ]0

25 46

H 52

IBO.6 46 16B.5 41

274.0 251).1

12 16

CASES UNDER PROBATION SUPERVISlDN DURING HIE YEAR I

lold

Rate Rank

m.6 Jj

644.0 41

m.1 Sl 512.5 56

1,009.2 10 915.1 II

412.2 61 410.3 60

850.l 27 847.9 19

608.2· 51 5B9.9 50

m.l 60 111.6 U

B51.5 26 B32.1 n

71U 41 m.9 19

1,206.9 1,110.1

701.0 45 102.0 16

690.1 41 669.B H

955.9 12 m.s 11

fuilr Courl

R~h Rank

11.2 41 105.1 21

39.0 £1 18.5 60

m.9 6 121.6 15

41.2 59 n.4 62

m.8 m.9

51.1 54 11.2 5B

B~.l JO 53.2 54

101.9 ., 111.1

60.4 49 51.1 S3

109.2 21 19.9 35

111.6 160.1

Bl.l 35 16.0 11

150.8 m.l

'[rilinal Lourt

Rale R.nk

651.4 36 m.o 49

m.l t9 494.0 51

B52.] 191.5

419.0 lil6.S

11 Il

59 60

621.5 12 41o.1i 16

55!.! 546.1

404.0 361.4

50 47

61 61

747.7 2S 690.6 26.

654.4 31 511.2 45

1,091.1 1,090.1

526.5 55 521.9 SO

602.7 593.0

B05.1 157.1

45 40

20 16

CASES UNDER PROBATION SUPE~VISJON OK DECEH&Ek 31

Totd

Rate Rank

m.1 lS m.9 10

161.8 48 419.2 50

150.8 740.0

m.o 61 m.2 59

567.9 31 5B2.9 24

m.o 41 m.l 49

161.4 60 . 289 .• 0 60

591.9 26 576.4 26

52U 40 459.7 n

8B5.1 6 m.l 9

m.l 53 418.6 46

418.0 16 454.1 14

662.1 19 6~6.9 20

Fuily Court

Rate Rank

41.7 lO n.1 Jl

15.1 59 24.1 19

86.1 12.1

7 B

1&.6 58 .18.2 60

97.8 m.1

37.2 41 16.B 61

51.8 22 13.4 42

52.6 26 59.1 IB

21.5 53 n.6 41

57.5 19 31.l 3B

11.1 10 IoU 3

ILl H n.9 4il

90.1 11>.1

5 6

Crilina! Court

Rate Rank

m.5 32 m.l 39

419.2 15 m.2 11

664.5 661.1

15 II -

m.s 59 114.fl 56

410.1 m.5

110.6 401.0

41 11

41 46

106.5 61 155.6 60

m.l 26 m.l 21

500.0 34 426.2 41

827,6 102.4

6 9

m.6 55 314.9 S4

m.6 420.2

H 4J

572.1 22 530.6 22

-----------------------------------------------.. ----.:.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------':'------- ... --------------------------------------------------.. ---------------~.------I Continued on next paqe. I

1.1bll 1~"2

CDUIIlV

SULLIVAN

TIOGA

TOHPKIHS

ULSTER

PROBATION SUPERVISION RAlES PER 100,000 POrULAIION AHD ~AIE RAIlr.S BY COUNIY fOR 1985 ~ND 1986

Vear

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1m

1986 1985

PRODAlION SUPERVISION caSES RECEIVED

TotAl

RAte Rank

m.9 ~&9.8

282.4 H 234.1 39

199.B 54 m.l 41

257.0 19 130.8 39

ruBy Courl

Rale Rank

90.4 59.2 I~

68:6 15 59.5 14

32.0 50 25.0 51

46.9 Jl 17.2 3B

Cr .. inal Court

Rate

m.6 350.6

213.7 tH.7

I61.B 191.4

210.1 "1.6

Rank

14 41

5J 33

11 34

CASES UlIDER PROBftlll111 ~UPERVISIDH DURING HIE YEAR I

Total

Rate Rant

1,523.3 1,409.7

S06.1 21 m.7 21

m.B U 695.4 . 11

722.1 42 640.5 48

f .. i IV Court

Rite RInk

140.1 8 I22.B 14

12J.6 18 95.1 25

54.0 ~l 60.1 14

81.0 17 67.2 4l

Cnlina! Court

Rale

1,174,6 1,286.9

lb4.7 HO.4

661.0 m.l

641.1 51).4

Rank

24 21

35 11

19 46

CASES UNDER PROBATIOn SUtERYISlU1l 011 DECEHOER 31

lolill

Rile Rank

',125.4 1,072.5

621.5 23 611.4 19

m.l U 512.8 34

566.' 32 465.3 42

FalBy Courl

Rilt Rant

72.9 60.6 16

66.7 11 51.6 22

10.B 46 22.7 52

49.1 29 11.0 U

Cr i I!PAI Court

fiale

1,052.5 I,OIl.D

556.9 551.8

466.9 496.1

511.1 m.l

Rank

24 21

42 28

1~ 40

~ WARREN 1986 1985

132.4 4S 45.0 35 187.4 190.5

4l 11

618.0 52 10.1 H 6~.9 II

541.7 m.9

52 54

421.0 56 20.8 48 m.2 lSi.S

52 52 ......

00

WASIIINGTON

WAYNE

WESTCHESTER

WYOMING

YAIES

NEWIORKSTATE

HEW YORK CITY

1986 1965

1m 1985

1986 1985

1986 1'185

1986 1905

1986 1985

1986 1985

230.1 40

302.3 19 213.2 n

269.1 11 291.l 19

256.4 40 258.0 32

289.2 21 m.l 26

264.2 Jl 246.7 36

270.5 NA nl.9 NA

232.4 NA 122.1 N(I

H.S 34

12B.3 80.1

63.6 10 60.5 7

30.1 52 33.7 U

7B.4 91.0

11.7 44 60.5 12

10.8 HA 37.3 HA

.21.2 NA 19.1 NA

114.0 125.1

205.1 222.7

126.1 22-\.3

210.8 104.4

m .• 186.2

m.6 224.1>

211.2 203.1

50 57

n 21

20 26

16 40

21 39

NA 11ft

NA NA

~60. 7 55

m.B 40 m.2 51

81U 26 781.5 20

904.0 18 005.9 25

. 740.2 lD 666.2 45

915.1 17 Bu5.2 26

878.6 NA 8u7.6 NA

850.4 Uft 787.1 IIA

IBB.O 156.B

1lB.6 10 121.1' 16

62.0 41 61.9 45

142.2 9 125.4 10

89.6 12 102.4 21

79.1 NA 75.1 NA

42.1 11ft 39.7 IIA

m.B m .•

706.B 662.5

842.6 HI.D

59B.0 546.9

m.5 7~2.8

199.5 712.5

008.l 741.3

56 57

10 29

16 20

46 48

10 21

NA NA

NA NA

lBU 53

450.1 51 355.9 56

5BU 27 579.1 25

101.8 Il 647.4 15

517.2 41 m.4 45

712.1 II 612.3 16

645.B NA 608.0 IIA

650.7 Uft m.iI 11ft

25.2 48

100.2 49.1 27

69.3 12 75.4 1

H.l 44 12.5 H

50.B IB 61.9 11

42.5 17 51. 2 25

40.6 Uft 40.5 NA

19.1 HA 21. 2 NA

158.5 306.6

519.1 50l.1

667.5 614.9

458.1 38&.4

66U 591.1

605.2 567.5

m.6 m.7

56 58

29 27

11 14

41 49

12 16

HA UA

HA NA

-- --- ------ ... -- - - -- -. --- ------------------ ---------------------------------- .. ----- ..... ----_ .. ----r---------- ----........... -------- ------- ---- -. - --- ----- --- -------- .. ------ ------------- --- ----- - -- -----------------------------• rhe lolal nu.~~r 01 pr~bation c .. es ~upervl5ed during a given yfar; I.e., probili~n cases carried ove, Iroa Ihe prevIous year tcas~s undEr supfrvision on Cecelber 311 plus Ihose receiVEd dUring Ihf year. tlOIl: Draoallc chan~es In rank scores should be interpreted .lIh caution. Ihe senslllvily ol.rales 10 relatively s.all changes In ahalule nUlbers increases as the SilO 01 Ihe pupulallun decreases.

hr e,a.ple, an increase .. ! one III in a given aclivlly In a counly Wllh 5,~OO residents .ill cause the VAlue 01 Ihe rate 10 Incre,se Ly'2~, .hile an Increase 01 one til in a county .tlh 51',000 resldenls Will cause the value 01 Ihe rate 10 Increase by unty lNO 121.

SUllnLE: IIYS D'VI.IOII 01 frob.l,on alld CorrNtional Alternd,ves.

HIBlE 7& fROBflTlOH REVOCATIONS PER 1000 PROBATIONERS AND RAIE RANKS DY roUNIY fOR 1905 AND 19B6

REVOCATIONS -------------- ... _--------- ------------------------ -------_ .. --------- ------------------ -------------

Criainal Courlill ------------------ ------------------ .. ------------

Tolall Faci I Y [Durin Total Technical HeM Conv ------ .. ------ ---- ... _------- ----------_ ..... -----------.. - -------------

COUIHY Year Rde Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate • Ranlt Rate Rank ------------_ ..

ALBANY 1986 04.3 5 64.0 32 96.7 2 57.B J 2a.t 15 1995 60.7 11 64.0 30 60.4 9 44.6 5 15.'1 31

AllEGANY 1996 21.3 51 54.1 36 17.1 60 13.7 49 l.4 57 19B5 10.6 51 66.1 29 12.6 59 9.4 51 4.2 56

BRONI 1986 BO.9 6 37.1 H 82.7 65.1 2 11.5 30 1985 7S.3 S 89.2 20 74.7 5 65.4 9.2 47

SROOHE 1996 16.4 51 39.B 40 24.1 52 15.2 45 U H 1985 43.1 34 63.9 J2 to.5 33 19.5 36 22.0 21

OJ CATTARAUGUS 19B6 29.9 49 25.3 52 29.6 41 12.j 51 11.2 31 I

'-l 1985 9.6 61 16.1 SI O.S 61 .0 59 8.5 50 -0

CAYUGA 1m B9.2 100.0 11 07.1 20.1 20 59.6 1905 99.1 6B.2 11 103.9 28.7 22 15.3

CHAUTAUQUA 1986 40.4 41 35.S 46 41.1 J6 26.4 22 14.8 35 1985 49.6 25 14.3 26 44.0 26 21.4 29 22.6 20

CHEHUNG 19B& 56.& 19 118.8 10 44.9 32 36.5 15 8.4 47 1995 55.5 15 113.6 13 45.4 23 37.S 12 1.9 53

CHENANGO 1986 87.9 2 95.2 10 86.6 J 55.9 30.7 II 1985 55.1 14 46.5 41 Sl.0 10 44.3 12.7 40

ClINION 19B& 20.0 59 21.3 54 19.9 57 12.2 53 7.6 51 1985 22.7 56 63.5 Jl lB. i S6 16.3 42 1.8 59

COLUnBIA 1986 59.2 17 77.9 25 .54.3 11 54.3 5 .0 59 1m 49.2 24 75. B 25 41.3 25 33.2 17 II.I 43

--------._---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I Continued on ned plge. I

TABLE 7& PROBAIION ~EVOCATIONS PER 1000 PRObAJlOHERS AND MIE RANKS BY COUHIY FOR 1905 AND 1?86 I - Continued

REVOCAl IONS ---------_ .. _-_ .. -----.. ---- ----.. ------ .. ------------ ------------------ --------_ .. _------- --------...... ---

Criainal Caudill - .. -------_ .. ------- -----_ .. _------_ .. _- -------------

Tolall faaily Caurtl! Tolal Tecbnic .. lieN Conv ------ ...... ---- ------------- ---- ... -------- ------------- -_ .. ----------

CoU/nv Year Rde Rant Rilte Rank Rale Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank --------------

CORTLAND 1986 49.8 21 104.2 15 42.B 34 26.1 21 16.0 J4 1m 55.3 16 125.0 8 41.9 19 29.3 21 18.6 27

DELAWARE 1986 2~.J 54 69.0 30 20.2 55 12.1 54 0.1 50 1985 IS.2 59 .0 54 16.8 57 4.2 56 12.6 41

DUTCHESS 19B6 39.0 43 74,6 27 3U 42 28.7 19 5.9 54 1985 42.2 3B 155.9 3 2l.2 54 14.2 41 9.1 49

ERIE 19B6 41.7 31 m.o 5 27.0 51 21.1 31 5.0 55 1985 52.2 19 81.1 21 n.l 20 33.4 16 It.O 36

CD ESSE I 1m 27.2 50 .0 59 30.5 45 24.4 28 6.1 53 I

ro 1985 23.1 54 111.1 U 12.9 58 .0 59 12.9 38 0

FRANKLIN 19B6 41.1 39 38.5 42 41.4 35 24.9 27 16.6 3J 1985 28.7 50 .0 54 n.3 4l 15.2 45 18.2 29

fULTON 1986 54.9 22 105.3 13 50.8 22 a.5 57 42.4 1985 50.3 21 76.9 24 48.& 16 2.2 58 46.6 2

6ENESEE 1986 14.7 35 140.8 4 35.1 41 22.5 30 12.6 37 1985 42.0 35 3b.4 44 n.l 28 2B.4 23 14.9 3J

GREENE 1986 64.9 13 33. J H 69.0 10 47.4 7 21.6 25 19B5 62.B 9 200.0 2 • 43.1 29 14.4 46 28.7 II

HAKILJON 1986 .0 62 .0 59 .0 62 .0 61 .0 59 1985 .0 62 .0 54 .0 62 .0 59 .0 60

HERKIKER 1986 20.7 58 18.7 56 21.4 54 10.7 56 10.7 42 1985 28.9 49 .0 54 37.9 JO 37.9 10 .0 60

----------.-.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..:--------------------------------

I CDntinued on next page. I

IAOLE 7& PROOATION F;EVOCATIONS PER Jl106 PRObATIONERS AND RATE RAIIKS BY COUNTY fOR 1985 AND 1966 t - Continued

REVOCATIONS ------------------------- ... ----------------------- ------------------ -----------_ ... ----- ----------- .. -

Criainal Courilit ----------------.. - ------------------ ----------- .. -

Total' faai I y [ourlll lolil Tecbnin1 /leu Conv ------------- ------------ --------.. ---- ------------- -------------

coum Year R.te HalIk Rale Rank Rale Rank Rale Rdn~ Rale Rank -----_ ... -------

JEffERSON 1986 48.2 2Y 48. , 37 48.1 25 18.0 3Y 30.1 13 1985 n.l 23 lOY. I. 15 39.0 34 25.0 27 14.0 35

KINGS 1966 51.7 26 12.2 58 53.6 19 !l.0 50 40.1 6 1985 3b.9 41 11.2 52 38.0 37 7.3 52 30.6 9

LE~IS 1986 22.9 56 38.5 42 20.1 56 20.1 35 .0 59 1985 35.4 45 25.6 46 37.7 40 25.2 26 12.6 42

LIVINGSTON 1986 80.1 B 1l0.4 b 16.3 8 15.6 41 60.7 I 1985 53.0 18 121. 2 10 48.6 16 16.9 41 31.9 a

OJ HADISON 1986 24.9 55 57.1 3f 22.5 53 14.1 41 8.2 48 I 1985 56.0 13 102.6 16 52.5 14 33.4 15 19.1 25

OJ I-'

nOHRDE 1986 11.7 46 39.9 38 30.9 4J 16.9 42 14.0 36 1985 29.7 48 '56,6 36 27.1 51 17.3 1Y 9.B 46

nDNT6DHERY 1986 86.1 3 197.0 61.0 12 IS.2 H 4B.8 1 1995 4b.6 27 122.8 32.5 44 6.5 51 2b.O 15

NASSAU 1986 11.2 47 34.3 4B 30.9 44 12.3 52 18.6 29 1985 4~.B 29 53.7 38 45.0 24 26.0 33 21.9 16

NEW YORK 1m 51.9 24 39.9 38 52.4 20 n.B 40 lB.6 1965 62.2 10 35.5 45 63.4 7 19.4 35 44.0 3

NIAGARA 1986 54.1 23 I25.B 46.5 28 17 .6 41 28.9 16 1m 45.9 28 125. ~ 37 .4 41 15.6 n 21.8 22

DlIEIDA 1986 59.9 15 192.1 45.0 31 lB.7 37 26.3 11 1985 54.0 17 126.4 46.1 21 19.8 J4 26.4 14

----- - --- -- -------------------- ----.- --------.--------. -- ------------------------ - --.-------. ------------ - ------------- ---_ ... --- ------------------------( Conllnued on nell plge. )

IABLE 7& PRODAIIOH hEVOrATiONS PER 1000 PhObATlONERS AND kAlE RANKS BY COUNIY fOR 1985 AND 19B6 I - Continued

REVOCAIIONS _________________________ ________________________ -_0._-------------- _______________________________

Criainal Courtlll -------- .. - .. ------- --- ... ----- .. ---.. ---- -------------

Total t fa6ily COurtll Totll Technical HeN Con v ----_ ... _------ ----------..... - ------------- ------------- -------------

CDU!iH Year Rde Rank Rate ftan~ Rate Rank Rate Ran~ Hate R.n~ -----------_ ... -

ONONDAGA 1986 BO.8 118.2 11 76.4 75.5 1 .0 58 19B5 aO.l 100.0 17 IB.3 15.3 2 l.1 51

OIHARIO 1986 81.1 101.0 16 B2.2 5 41.9 Il 40.1 19&5 B6.l 94.1 19 8S.1 1 41.4 1 41.1

ORANGE 1986 71.8 II 91.2 22 68.S 11 44.0 12 24.5 21 1985 42.5 36 15.2 46 43.7 21 14.6 14 Y.I 48

ORLEANS 1986 45.8 33 125.0 8 18.2 3D 26.3 24 11.9 40 1985 36.1 41 .0 54 3B.7 36 31.5 10 1.3 54

OJ OSWEGO 1986 40.8 40 IJ.O 51 46.2 29 33.7 17 12.5 18 I 19B5 23.9 51 12.2 51 n.6 52 18.2 11 8.4 51 CO

N

OTSEGO 1986 25.4 51 .0 59 27.6 50 2.B 60 2t9 19 1985 21.6 51 •. 0 54 30.2 41 11.0 49 19.2 24

PUTNAK 1986 4B.6 28 63.5 13 46.B 21 20.6 11 26.2 18 1~85 4G.3 39 41.1 40 39.Q 35 20.6 32 IB.l 2B

DUEENS 19B6 ~6.5 31 32.1 50 47.4 26 6.J 58 41.1 5 1965 31.9 42 3B.9 4J 37.B 3'/ U 55 33.2 1

RENSSELAER 1986 H.4 36 92.4 21 35.6 40 26.3 2J 9.3 45 1ge5 IB.I 59 59.0 35 11.1 60 9.2 50 2.5 56

RICHMOND mb 46.4 32 80.2 24 42.9 33 11.2 55 31.7 9 1985 51.6 20 64.0 30 50.b 15 21.& lO 2'1.4 10

ROCKLAND 1986 46.9 30 24.9 53 54. 9 16 35.0 16 19.9 21 I~B5 44.5 32 11.4 . 5& 55.C· 11 4&.8 9 14.2 34

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Continued on ned page. )

J hSLE 7& rROeAIIOH REVOCATIONS rER 1000 PRObAlJONERS AND ~AJE RANKS BY COUNTY fOR 1985 AND 19Bb I - Conlinued

REVOCATJ ONS .... _---------------_ .. _---- -- ... - .. ------------- .. ----- ----... ------------- ----.. ------------- -- ... _-------.. -

Cri6inal Courtlll ------------------ -----------_ ... ----- -------------

Tullil F a~il y [our III Total Technical Hew [on v ----------... -- ------------- ------------- ------------- ... ---.. _-------

COUlnt Year Rate Rank Rale Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank Rate Ran~ -_ ..... _- ....... _----

Sf. LAWRENCE 1906 26.2 52 98.4 18 19.2 58 14 •• 46 4.8 56 19B5 31.4 U 40.8 42 n.9 42 21.0 31 12.9 38

SARATOGA 19B6 11.2 9 85.1 23 75.4 9 45.2 JO 30.2 12 1m 74,6 6 Jl6.3 12 68.5 6 49.7 4 IB.8 26

SCHENECTADY 1986 36.0 44 76.9 26 30.3 46 20.:1 14 9.0 41 19B5 4~.5 31 117.4 II 30.B ~6 15.4 H 15.4 32

SCHOHARIE 1986 56.3 20 55.6 35 56.' 15 25.6 25 30.8 10 1985 26.6 52 .0 54 29.1 48 5.0 54 23.3 19

OJ SCHUYLER 1986 57.1 IB 105.3 • 13 52.4 21 52.4 6 .0 59 I CP 1ge5 41.9 J3 214. J I 31.4 45 n.2 24 5.2 55 w

SENECA 1906 75.2 10 70.2 29 76.9 47.3 29,6 \4 19E5 95.7 2 50.8 39 111.1 74.0 35.1 5

STEUBEN 1986 59.8 16 70.6 28 50.2 It 46.2 12.0 39 1965 58.3 12 81.1 23 55.4 12 41.5 Il.O 37

SUFfOLK 1986 45.3 It 20.2 55 50.0 24 29.0 18 21.0 26 1985 42.3 37 25.2 49 45.4 :!2 25.8 ~5 19.6 23

SULllVAN 19B6 51.7 25 39.2 41 51.0 19 44.5 II 0.5 46 1985 49.3 22 bO.2 14 46.3 18 37.9 10 10.3 45

TIOGA 1986 68.6 12 112.9 12 61.5 13 38.5 14 23.1 22 1985 41.5 26 83.3 22 42.9 3C 34.9 Il B.O 52

TOnPKIHS 1986 35.1 45 125.0 8 27.6 49 20.7 32 6.9 52 1985 45.7 30 94,3 IB 41. t 32 lu.4 20 1f1.7 H

-------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------------------------------------------------_ .. _---------------------------------I Continued on nell paqe. I

OJ I

00 .f'>

1~8lE 18 PRUDAI ION kEVOCAIIONS tEfi IODO PfiO&ATJOllERS AND hATE RANI:S BY COUNTY FOR 1985 AND 1906

REVOCATJOIIS -_ .. -------------_ .. ------- _ .... _------------------- -------------- .. _-- ------------------ -------------

[ri ai nal Cnurlill ---- .. ------------- -----------.. ~----- -------------

Tolall faailv Courlll Told Technical He~ [on v ------------- ----..... __ .. _ ... -- ------------- ----------- .. - -----------_ ...

[OUIIIY Year Rale Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank ble Rank Rolle R,;uk

--------------

ULSTER 1906 55.6 21 97.7 19 50.3 23 25.6 25 24.7 20 1985 65.8 8 l27.l 5 58.6 9 3~.9 t9 27.7 12

~ARREN 1986 61.2 14 179.5 46.1 30 2l.O 29 23.0 23 1905 67.3 7 m.3 56,2 11 22.5 2B n.7 "

WASHINGTON 1906 20.9 49 28.0 51 29.3 48 18.3 38 11.0 41 19a5 3U 41 67.' ' 28 28.9 49 4.1 51 24.8 17

HAYNE 1m 41.7 38 65.6 11 37.0 J9 17.7 40 19.1 28 1985 H.4 411 20.3 47 41.4 31 17.2 40 24.1 10

WESTCHESTER 1986 40.1 42 35.5 45 40.4 J7 1B.B 36 21.6 24 1985 lil. I 47 5U 37 29.1 5C1 12.1 49 16.0 30

UYOHIHG 1906 16.6 60 34.5 47 12.3 61 4.1 ~9 0.2 4a 1905 IU 60 .0 54 IB.2 55 1B.2 31 .6 60

YATES 1996 15.5 61 .0 59 17.1 59 .0 61 17.1 32 19a5 23.1 54 .0 54 26.5 53 .0 59 26.5 13

NEWYORKSTATE 1986 50.0 HA 56.0 NA 49.5 HA 24.6 NA 24.8 UA 1985 41.5 IIA 56.5 NA 46.6 NA 24.3 Nil 22.3 Nfl

liEU YORK CITY 1986 56.6 HA 10.1 IIA 58.0 HA 22.7 HA 35.2 IIA 1985 51.0 NA 40.6 Hil 51'.6 Hit 22.0 IIA 29.6 N~

I Rates based on the nueber 01 I alii y and cri al nal courl cases supervl sed, duri ng the year.

It Rales based on the nuober 01 fauly court probation cases supervised during the year.

It, Hates base~ on the nu.ber Dr cri.I'nd courl probation cases ~upervlsed dUring the year.

HOlE: ~raoallc (hang~s In rank scores should be ir,lerpreled .ilh caution. ThE sensltlvlly 01 rates to relatlV~ly sull challges in absolute nu.hers increa5e~ as lhe size of the population decreases. Por eta'ple, an incnase 01 one III In a given activily in a (ounly' .ith 5,0&0 residents HilI cause the value 01 lhe rate 10 Increase by 20, .hile in Increase of one III III a county .ilh 5u,O&O residents .ill (duse the value ul the rate to increase by only two m.

5UU~C£: W(S fiivision 01 Probdion and Currrcti~nal flilernalths.

OJ I

00 U1

ImE 9

COLIUI'I

ALBANY

ALLEGANY

BROOHE

CAlI ARAU6US

CAYUGA

CIlAUIAUDUA

CHEMUNG

CHENAIIGO

ClINION

COLUMBIA

CORILAND

DELAWARE

DUICHESS

HIL AIID PENIlENmRY AOMISSIONS, WAcm, MD POPUlAIION RAIES PER 130,000 POPUlAIIDH AND kAlE RANY.S &Y COUNIV fOR 1985 AHD 1966 I

Year

1906 1905

1m 1905

1986 1905

198~

1905

1986 190~

1906 1985

1906 1965

1986 1985

1906 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1906 1905

1986 1985

lotil

R.te R.nl

1,361.4 22 1,259.4 25

960.1 46 ~88.0 48

1,J21.] 3D 1,010.3 41

1,2Bl.l 26 ',1lB.6 21

1,249.1 30 1,451.6 11

1,101.6 10 1,014.2 40

11428.7 19 1,19(1.1 11

1,026.0 41 1,141.8 35

l,m.6 l,b15.8 II

1,416.1 20 1,414.1 18

1,751.2 1,6~8.6

1,023.4 H 819.0 52

1,005.8 15 m.l 44

Ad.isslon5

Unsentenced

Rite Rink

m.4 29 860.1 32

829.1 36 ISO. S 42

185.6 40 732.4 13

963. I 25 9S8.6 21

851.1 13 940.1 26

712.9 12 694.0 45

941.1 21 m.o 31

522.0 51 662,5 19

1,496.) 6 1,IS1.3 II

l,on.4 21 996.1 20

1,310.1 10 1,299.8 B

681.9 48 569.1 51

811.9 35 162.8 40

Sentenced

"ate Rink

427.0 U n~.I. 16

158.4 51 !l7.S 56

m.B 25 307.8 27

320.0 28 2&U 13

m.o 18 511.2 6

m.7 21 15').1 24

481.J 5 m.l 19

504.0 IBO.4

1t0.l 10 m.5 Y

m.3 21 111.5 14

W.O 11 m.8 10

m.5 26 m.s 11

111.0 50 110.9 51

,

JAil AHD PENllEIIIIA~Y

kepof led Capici tv

Rde hink

150.1 IS3.2

6Y.l 11 68.B 35

95.0 17 85.1 2:

89.1 2~

89.1 21

11. 6 20 11.6 29

6U 18 61. V 18

101.1 Il 1011.0 ,ll

66.0 42 M.O I~

64.0 H 63. I 4l

n.J 20 '9S. I 10

61.5 40 bI.S 19

6).7 IS 68.2 37

68.1 lV 68.6 36

A •• fig. Daily Population

R,te Rink

m.3 128.6

55.4 45 SI.I H

12.6 28 71.S 21

7l. Y 27 51.4 H

61.6 Jl 62.6 JS

60.8 39 60.) 31

100.6 9 88.1 11

56.0 41 S6.0 41

56.1 41 53.9 42

11.4 24 89.1 10

78.1 21 78.1 22

H.6 52 11.1 S6

61.S 38 56.0 10

Decuber 31 fopuhti on . ..;.---------------- --- .. -------------- -_ .... _--------

lotd

Rite Rink

m .• . m.1

n.1 14 45.2 44

14.0 25 71.5 21

71.' 20 12.1 20

47.6 H IIB.9 25

68.5 31 49.9 41

103.9 108.1

6 B

44.0 4Y 11.0 55

55.4 40 58.0 31

12. 5 26 75.9 16

86.5 II 111.8 1

21.4 51 41.9 16

52.6 U 50.0 Jl

Unsenhnced

kd. k.n~

68.5 61.8

4 8

19.6 26 21.6 17

35.1 36 lS.l 28

55.1 32.0 32

25.0 41 10.1 23

50. J Il 35.4 21

47.5 18 4S.7 11

16.0 53 2tl.O 51

10.8 II 11.1 31

16. 2 l~,

12. 9 1~

21.4 45 80.2 6

IV.I 50 21.7 41

19. I 2S 12.3 21

Sentellced

Rite R.n~

64.9 49. I

2).8 32 23.6 Jl

38.9 15 36.2 9

22.3 40 19.8 6

22.5 39 2B.8 21

18.2 41 14.6 49

56.4 6).0

28.0 25 14.0 51

2U 29 25.1 32

36.2 18 1).0 14

59.1 2 11.1 11

1.2 57 11.1 n

12.9 54 IS. I 41

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... _----------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. ---( lOhlinutd all ne,1 p'ge. I

OJ I

00 en

lAKE 9

cauNlY

ERIE

ESSEI

fRAN~lIN

FuLlOH

GENESEE

GREENE

HMILlOH

HEkKIHER

JEfFERSON

LEWIS

L1VIIIGSIOH

MOl SOH

HOHROE

JAil AHO P(HJI[HlIARY AO"15510N5, [AfHtm, AND fOPULAIlOH RATES PER 100,000 POPULAIION nHO HAlE RANKS BY tUUNIY fOR 1965 AHD 1986 • - Continued

Year

19B6 1905

1906 1905

19B6 1965

19B6 1~05

1906 19B5

1906 1905

1906 190~

1906 1985

1906 1905

1906 1985

1906 1985

1906 1905

1986 1905

Told

Rale Rank

1,178.3 35 1,170.4 34

1,019.6 H 150.7 54

1,456.6 17 l,m.6 21

I,m.o 23 1,6B~.2 9

1,481.1 16 1,291.1 21

2,I56.B 1,697.4

1,260.0 29 1,624.9 10

1,111.6 39 l,llI.2 37

1,217.4 JJ 1,181.9 3.

632.. 56 906.0 45

1,665.5 11 1,549.9 15

1,225.2 32 1,111.7 36

1,300.3 25 1,198.4 30

Adaissions

Unsenlenced

Rate Rank

I,OIl.6 22 I,OP6.7 19

716.9 41 m.o 53

m.. 23 m.9 25

470.7 55 505.1 55

I,OBO.4 19 902.2 21

1,40B.6 7 1,164.5 12

B20.0 31 1,IOJ.1 16

852.0 12 B60.7 11

B4B.B 34 164.1 39

4B2.2 54 766. Y 3B

.,196.2 11 1,111.0 11

m.5 26 80U 30

.,121.5 IB 950.2 24

Senlenced

fiale Rank

164.1 51 161.7 53

261.1 39 ~1l.1 4J

461.2 9 421.1 12

844.1 1,114.9

m.9 20 m.o 25

148.2 m.B

140.0 12 521.6 5

2U.6 40 213.5 14

m.l 24 m.7 I]

150.2 56 m.1 55

m.l 8 lIO.9 20

m.p 35 m.l 16

m.e 49 210.2 19

JAIL AHO PEUlTE11T MRY

Reported Capuily

Rah Rank

72.9 32 1GO.9 12

66.1 41 66.0 41

m.6 125.6

.0 57

.0 57

71.4 34 21.7 56

m.l 1J~.2

80.0 21 80.2 ?O

5J.B' 49 Sl.O 41

77.1 30 74.S 11

9G.9 21 91.4 20

95.6 10 96.0 17

70.6 15 lG.. 33

77.6 29 lu.2 31

Averige Dai 1y PopUlation

Ralr Rank

66. J J5 6S.5 11

H.I 51 11.0 57

9B.2 10 84.5 17

7B. e 22 04.8 14

52.1 H 41.4 51

90. J 14 04.4 IS

60.0 40 40.1 54

41.0 t9 50.1 lD

71.7 11 n.' 25

39.5 54 43.7 52

105.0 89.2

75.1 25 70.1 28

BO.B 21 60.9 29

Dece.ber 11 Popuhlion

lold Unsenlenced Sentenced

Balf R.nk Rale Rank Rate Rank

~9.1 11 40.1 24 19.2 45 53.4 37 17.4 26 16.1 45

24.0 56 16.5 52 D.l 56 13.0 56 10.2 36 2.B 57

82.2 11 36.5 J4 45.7 11 75.1 11 10.B 24 36.5 0

41.6 U 22.0 40 25.6 28 51.0 15 21.5 45 31.] 11

11.4 20 n.' 10 14.0 20 64.J 20 12.2 JJ 32.2 15

78.4 19 49.9 14 2B.5 24 60.1 36 31.0 10 20.5 28

40.0 51 .0 57 40.0 14 120..4 S 8u.2 5 40.1 5

U.l 50 29.9 U U.S 53 10.9 52 29.9 1D 9.0 56

5'-6 36 29.B II 29.8 22 65.5 27 11.6 35 31.9 12

~I.. 45 11.6 18 19.8 44 47.7 41 19.9 53 27.0 25

71.2 D 44.4 22 41.8 9 04.0 12 53.1 12 30.9 18

90.1 10 52.6 11 1U 16 56.9 Jb 28.5 46 2B.5 21

B7.1 IJ 63.6 6 21.5 J4 7906 15 53.1 11 26.1 11

------- ... ---------------_ .. _-------------------- .. -- .. -------------------------- .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I (nntillucd UII ",d v.qe. I

O:J , CO '-.J

1I,~lE 9

COUHlV

MONTGOMERY

H.SSAU

HI AGARA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO

ORANGE

ORlEANS

OSWEGO

OISEGO

PUIHAH

REIISSElAER

ROCr.LAIID

JAil AND PUIJIENIIARY ADMISSIONS. CAPACITY. AND PUPULATION RAIES PER 100.000 POPUlAlION AND RAIE RANKS OY CDUNIY FOR 1985 AND 'IY86 I - Continued

Year

1986 1985

19B6 1985

19B6 1985

1986 IY85

!YB6 1985

1m 1m

1986 1985

19B6 19B5

1986 1985

19B6 19B5

1986 1905

1986 1985

1986 1985

T6t.1

Rate kank

1,525.9 IS 1.5Y3.5 12

623.7 57 ~55.1 51

1,135.5 36 1.221.6 2Y

B6J.6 52 705.1 55

1.004.2 1.700.9

1,671.( 10 1.:;01.2 20

l,m.7 IJ I.J60.' 22

I,m.' 18 1.~90.2 24

1.070.2 41 1.129.8 J8

790.5 54 901.5 16

915.4 19 an.5 11

941.0 47 861.2 50

m.2 55 69Y.8 56

Ad.,ssioni

IInstntenced

R.te Rank

1,155.5 16 1.041.4 11

159.9 56 1£1.2 56

867.2 29 921.0 21

107.8 H 5JI.4 51

1,619.6 1,524.J

1,190.9 12 m.l 22

1,J17.6 9 1,148.2 15

1,156.8 IS 1,029.6 18

196.0 J8 168.0 37

567.6 51 616.5 50

163.5 U 160.2 41

716.5 U .6U 46

116.7 57 101.8 57

Senleaced

Rate R.nk

370.4 23 552,1. 3

163.0 52 I,YO.9 11

268.3 37 302.6 29

155.1 51 170.7 52

1~.6 47 1~.6 H

4BO.5 6 IOS.9 15

226.1 42 212.2 42

295.6 3J 260.6 JS

214.2 31 361.8 22

m.o II 288.0 J2

152.0 5S m.3 S1

225.4 41 195.6 16

J15.S 30 290.0 31

JAIL AND PENIlEHIlARY

Reported CapaCIty

aale Rank

IB4.1 18B.5

1 2

12.7 J1 bI.1 12

91.1 15 91.9 14

B2.9 25 B~.2 26

99.7 II 87.9 23

91.6 16 96.J 15

94.S 19' 96.2 J6

185.1 166.1

BO.J 26 BO.6 27

11.2 5S 37.1 51

H.O ~I

19.4 ~O

n.s 31 1S.3 10

30.6 56 Ju.9 55

Average Daily Popuhti6n

R.te Rank

120.9 YI.I

66.1 ID 62.3 19

Bl.1 11 64.5 16

80.9 20 14.2 21

91.3 12 96.3

91.3 II 85.5 13

90.9 Il 80.0 26

156.6 125.2

66.9 34 69.1 36

H.O· 46 48.8 49

41.6 50 49.4 48

41.5 51 50.9 45

31.2 S6 36.2 55

Oeceober 11 Population

Total

Ratf Rani

120.9 I 8l.9 II

B7.2 12 85.Y 10

75.6 21 69.1 21

16.9 22 67.0 26

B1.1 16 n.o 9

90.0 II 85.5 II

85.9 IS 1J.S 19

06.8 J] 122.6 1

51.] II 57.9 34

35.5 52 42.1 49

H.I 4B JU 50

51.1 41 37.0 53

33.5 53 32.8 57

Unsenlenced

Rjle Rank

72.9 66.4

6D.5 51.3

3 7

46.120 35.1 29

52.7 10 40.7 22

47.1 19 54.6 10

31.5 39 20.6 50

IU 15 51.2 14

41.1 21 99.6 3

36.5 28 21.7 12

11.8 56 15.2 . 56

20. B 49 21. 0 19

30.3 42 21.l 48

IU 51 20.0 52

5enltnced

~41e Rank

46.0 B 15.2 48

26.6 26 20.~ 22

29.5 23 3l.6 10

24.1 30 2h.l l6

36.1 17 37.4 7

56.6 61.9

36.2 19 22.3 11

25.1 21 23.0 35

15.9 SO 30. 2 2~

2J.6 J1 27.0 21

23. J 36 18.5 41

21.1 11 15.9 \6

16.5 49 12.8 53

------ .. -----_ .. -...... _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------t lunlinutd 011 1I •• l p.gt. I

co I

OJ OJ

T,1~LE 9

COUNIY

51. LAWRENCE

SARAIOGA

SCHENECl AOY

SCHOHARIE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

STEUBEN

SUFFOLK

SULLIVAN

1I0GA

IOnPUH:l

ULSTER

WARREN

JAIL ~NOP[IIJ1ENIIAHY ADHISSlOUS, CAPACIlY, AND POPUl.1II0N RAIES PEP. 100,600 POfULftIION AND ~AlE "AUKS BY COUNIY fOR 1905 AND 1906 I - Conlinued

Year

1906 19B5

19B6 1905

1906 1985

19B6 1905

19B6 1905

1996 19B5

1996 I~05

1986 1985

1986 1m

1986 1985

1986 1985

1996 1965

1986 1985

lohl

~ate R~nk

827.1 53 798.0 53

912.4 48 8.36.1 SI

1,283.0 21 l,m.2 28

I,m.a 21 1,ll'~. 7 39

1,189.1 34 1,814.6 3

1,551.6 14 1,5~3. 2 13

I,IJI.I 31 m.6 n

999.1 50 619.1 49

2,606 •• 2,491.1

1,225.5 31 1,165.0 32

1,269.4 28 1,190.8 IY

1,584.1 12 1,518.6 16

I,YI7.1 1,3B5.1

Adaissions

Unsenlenced

~ote Ronk

557.6 52 561.1 52

751.9 45 m.8 49

970.7 24 919.1 2B

1,061.1 20 B89.3 2Y

19J.1 39 1,413.4 4

1,180.1 Il 1,294.1 Y

966.9 30 177.1 3b

681.7 49 66B.O 41

1,849.9 1,791.4

754.9 H 78b.0 3S

1,IS1.5 14 1,251.1 10

1,151.0 11 1,159.5 IJ

1,515.1 1,452.2

Sentenced

Rate Rank

269.5 J6 m.l H

llB.S 49 11l.9 50

112.3 11 m.1 26

108.1 32 211.4 44

196.. 19 111.2 21

376.9 22 m.1 lil

26402 3B 184.9 40

211.1 46 111.1 45

156.6 699.7

470.6 1 m.6 17

111.9 57 13'i.5 54

m.6 15 359.0 23

.401.0 17 m.1 11

JAIL AHO PENIlEIIJIARY

Reported C'p'CHr

R~h k.nk

51.1 40 51.8 48

42.1 53 n.l 52

58.6 U 58.1 H

70.5 36 70.5 32

120.7 . 8 119.9 9

105.9 12 09.5 22'

50.6 50 56.1 19

57.6 47 57.6 45

219.1 142.6

109.8 II 111.2 16

11.7 ~ H.4 51

8U 24 86.7 21

117.1 10 IOU II

Aver age bail y PopUlation

R.lt Hank

5Y.1 II 50.3 47

56.1 42 53.2 U

.61.9 31 68. ~ 30

51.7 46 5{d 46

10].4 1&2.8

87.2 16 79.4 21

60.1 12 61.0. 11

62.3 J6 65.1 11

212.0 '71.6

72.5 29 71.4 21

11.2 51 IB.8 50

04.1 19 81.Y 12

12.1 30 71.9 20

Oe~eabfr 11 Population

lold

RoIh Roink

53.2 42 45.0 45

56.1 J9 39.0 51

61.2 12 63.1 29

70.5 29 1l.6 41

~2.0 Ill. 1

91.0 10 10.2 22

6D.9 35 58.6 32

5B.1 38 52.2 19

201.2 160.6

76.5 21 69.5 24

25.1 55 41.1 48

69,4 10 75.1 1B

72.1 21 .&.5 42

Unsentenced

Ral. Rank

11.0 40 ID.5 55

32.3 31 21.1 46

49,3 16 5~.5 15

36.9 12 10.2 J7

46.0 2t m.9 2

17.4 11 12.7 26

10.2 29 44.2 16

3b.7 . Jl 32.1 Jt

153.1 121.2

25.5 46 H.l 25

14.0 54 26.1 43

51.2 12 5U 1l

~B.b 11 25.2 H

Senlenced

Hale Hank

22.2 41 26.5 29

23.8 JI 11.3 42

IB.O 40 12.6 54

3U 21 13.4 52

4 •• 0 10 11. 4 55

41.6 IJ 21.S 26

22.7 30 14.4 50

21.3 42 ~O.1 19

48.1 4:'4

51.0 6 31.0 16

10.1 55 11.0. 44

18.l 46 22.6 3.

21.4 15 iU 31

----~-.------------------------------------------- .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. , CUlIllllutd UII lIe,t poge. I

1,1bll 9 JAIL MID PEIIIIlNIlARY ADKISSIONS, CA~ACII1, ArlO ~DfULnIlOH RAIES PER 100,OUO POPULAIIOH A~D k~IE RANKS OY COUNIY fOR 19D~ AND 1906 • - Continued

JAIL AHD PENlIEHIlARY ------------------ ------------------ ------------------... -------------- ------------------ -----------------------_ .. ---.. ---- ---------_ .. _--..... - --.. ------_ .... ------ -------------

AdAlsslons Deccaber 31 Population -----------_ .. ----- ------------------ --------_ ....... - Reported Aver~qe Dally ------------------ ------------------ ------.. ------

10141 Unsentenced Senlenced [apmly topulilion latal Unsentenced Senlenced ----- .. -.. ----- ------------- ------------- .... ---------_ .. -_ .. ---------- -------.. ----- ------------- -------------

COUNIY Ve., ~al. Rank Rote Ran. ~de fiank Rate aan1 Rale en. Rat. Rant Rate kank Rale Ranl -.... _-- .. --_ .... _-

WASIII1I610H 19B6 1,302.3 24 B64. ) 31 m.6 1J 8).9 23 B).9 15 91.9 1 39.7 27 56.2 5 1905 1,245.8 26 812.1 3l 431,5 III 95.2 IY 84.6 IS 52.9 36 19.4 51 n.~ Il

mHE 19B6 1,814.8 I,m.' 416.' 14 65.9 U 15.0 n 11.3 21 54.5 9 22.1 3) 1935 1,?B7.5 l,llB.1 ~69.' 8 5~.O 46 6b.2 32 50.3 40 29.1 19 211.6 38

WE51CHESIER 1m 2,208.9 I,B92.4 JI6.S 29 110.2 11M 112.1 5 68.2 41.9 12 1985 1,813.6 1,600.2 241.5 10 '121.3 95.3 on,9 14 50.' 16 10.5 19

HYOnlHG 1986 872.5 51 652.0 5D 220.6 45 14.1 52 39.2 55 29.4 54 14.7 55 14.7 51 1985 1,012.9 42 705.6 H 301.J 28 ".J 51 11.8 53 3404 54 14.8 51 19.7 40

OJ IAIES 1986 1,781.7 1,551.9 235.8 41 119.2 160.4 m.1 117.9 2 11.2 52 I

00 1985 1,591.1 14 l,lSI.1 m.1 10 tn.9 153.6 125.7 97.7 1 2).9 21 lO

NEWYORKSIAIE 1986 1,319.2 NA 1,032.0 Nft 2B7.2 HA 120.7 NA liB.' IIA 110.0 UA 84.7 NA 31.1 HA 1985 '1,102.0 .. HB 096.0 HA 26~.2 IIA 110.1 HA 1115.4 HA 105.1 UB 72.9 UA 32.' llii

HEWYORr.C11 Y 1986 1,450.1 UB 1,129.1 HA m.o NA 178.1 NB 117.3 NA 181.8 HA m.1 UB 42.1 NA 1985 1.225.3 lin 890.! HA 321.0 UB 15!.1 IIA 150.1 NA 158.5 liB lib. 5 M 42.0 HA

--.... --.. -.------- ........ --------------------------------------------------------------------------...... ---.. ---- .. -.. --------------------------------------------------------- .. ---------- .. ------... --------.. --------------------------I udla dr. nol reporled by counly lor lie. Yar~ [Ily - only lor He. York [Ity a~ i .hole.

IlOIE: urdullC chanqes In rank >[6re5 ~hould be Inlerpreted .Ilh caullon. Ihe sensillvity 6f ,rat.s to relalively 5 •• 11 changes In ib~olute lIuabers Increases is Ihe si2e 01 the populali6n dlcreases. For fluph, an Incre.s. DIone III In a glV.n aCllvity In a countv Wllh 5,~OO re~ldents .ill c4use Ihe vilue of Ihe rate 10 increa~e by 20, .hlle an Increase of one 111 In a county Milb ~O,OIiIi reSidents Will cause the value 0' lI,' rat. 10 Incnase by 6nly 100 121.

SDuk[( : /lVS C&ul~slun of [orrecllon.

1,1ELE luA

coU/m

ALBANY

ALLEGAN¥

BRONI

BROOME

OJ CAll ARAUGUS I

lD a

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUQUA

CHEHUNG

CIIE/IANGO

ClINION

COLUMBIA

CORTLAIID

DELAWARE

Nld [OUhl COMMJ1HlIITS 10 SIr11E fRISON RAIES PER TlIO,OOO POPUlAlION AND RAiE RANt:S &'/ OffENSE lVPE nND COUNIY fOR I~05 AND 19B6

NEU [OURI [o"KII"ENI5 10 SIAIE fRISON -_._---------- - .. ------------ .. --.. --------_ .. -------------- --- ... ---------- ---------- .. --- -------------- -------.... ----- --- ... -----_ .. _ .... -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------

Year

I~B6

19B5

1m 1955

I~B6 19B5

19B6 100< ,."

1986 1m

19B6 1985

19B6 1m

1986 1995

19B6 1995

19B6 19E5

19B6 !995

19B6 1m

1906 1935

lold

Rde Rank

74.1 12.9

4.0 62 1.9 60

167.4 136.1

56.9 II 3B.1 19

11.1 51 I t.1 5b

5t.l Il 3G,1 2b

14.0 55 20,1 4J

64.1 SU

B.O 60 16.0 53

lO.B l2 1906 ~5

41.B 11 59.4 7

40.1 25 51.9 10

10.6 5B 4.3 b2

101.1

Rate Rank

25.1 10 21.5 12

.0 b2 l.9 5t

IOU 9409

2l.7 12 21.7 II

l.5 56 1.5 54

Ib.l 25 A.l 11

6.l 48 B.l 39

2B.7 29.4

2.0 bO B.O 41

b.2 49 U 50

1I.S l5 1B.2 19

b.l Ib.9

2.1 1.1

47 2i1

59 58

Violent Felonies

1/0.lcide

Rale fiank

2.B IS 1.4 31

.0 4l 2.0 21

14.9 13.1

2.4 20 .9 34

1.2 l5 .0 3b

l.l II .0 36

2.1 22 2.1 19

2.2 21 2.2 17

2.0 24 .0 36

.0 13

.0 36

Sex Olfen5es

Rate Rank

4.9 U l.9 t1

.0 51

.0 H

7.5 1.3

6.2 9 3.B IB

1.2 46 t.1 13

1.5 2.5 1B

1.4 H .0 41

b.6 7.6

.0 51 2.0 II

1.2 45 2.5 29

3.l 10' 4.9 Il I. 7 2B 5.0 B

.0

.0

.0

.0

13 lb

4l 1b

.0 51

.0 47

.0 2.1

51 30

Robbery

R.le Rank

'.2 21 4.6 Il

.0 4l

.0 40

5l.0 44.4

l.3 24 l.B 15

.0 U 2.1 24

.0 13

.0 46

.1 4\

.7 39

4.4 20 1.1 11

.0 41

.0 40

2.5 25 1.2 35

.0 41

.0 4&

.0 2.1

4l ?< .J

2.1 30 .0 10

Burghry

&~te &.n~

1.1 16 7.0 IS

.0 51

.0 52

11.8 10.1

9.0 II 9. 9 ~

.0 51

.0 52

5.0 22 l.8 31)

2.1 42 4.2 26

11.0 5 B.7 II

.0 51

.0 52

2.5 40 1.2 50

1.& 40 . 0.1 t2

6.l 2.1

.0

.0

17 14

51 52

WHpons

Rate n.nk

1.8 10 2.9 9

.0 25

.0 2l

10.4 11.5

.9 IB

.5 19

.0 25

.0 23

.0 25

.0 23

.0 25

.0 2l

.0 25 •• l 4

.0 2S

.6. 21

.0 25

.0 U

.0 25

.0 23

.0 4.2

.0

.0

25

25

"' .J

Other

Rdte ~.Q~

4.2 B I.B 27

.0 II 2.0 22

7.0 1.9

1.9 24 2.B 1&

1.2 l2 .& 10

2.5 17 .0 10

.0 37 I.; • 31

4.4 5.4

.0 37 6.0 b

.0 l7

.Il 46

1.6 26 3.3 12

.0 9.~

.0

.0

17 1

II lti

loh1

Rate Rank

11.6 10 20.0 5

.0 51

.0 H

32.1 21.5

5.7 19 .5 45

.0 51

.0 46

l.B 28 .0 46

.7 50 2.0 28

2.2 l6 .0 46

.0 51 4.0 20

1.7 29 1.2 4l

23.1 23.1

4.2 .0

.0 2.1

4 1

25 4£

5t 36

Drug felonies

Possession

kJte &ank

6.4 0.0

.0 l7

.6 32

S.I 5.7

5 5

2.8 Il .0 l2

.0 l7

.0 l2

.0 l1

.0 11

.0 l7 1.4 22

1.1 32 .0 12

.0 l1 2.0 15

.0 l7

.0 12

9.9 S.U

2.1 .0

3 7

18 32

.0 37

.1) 32

Solie

R.tf R.nk

~.l \l 12.0 6

.0 41

.0 42

24.5 15.7

2.8 24 .5 41

.0 41

.0 42

l.8 20 .0 42

.1 H 1.4 34

1.1 31 .0 42

.0 13 2.0 20

l.7 21 1.2 37

1l.2 18.2

2.1 .0

.0 2.1

29 42

n 21

Dther felonies

kate kanl·

36.1 29.9

4.0 59 2.0 59

25.l 1~.6 16

27.0 15.5 20

9.2 49 7.0 50

26.3 17.5 12

7.0 52 7.6 19

lO.9 26.1

5 5

6.0 55 4.0 55

20.9 14 12.1 31

13.2 29 IU 18

27.4 27.4

8.5 .0

40 ~I

Yoult.1ul Offenders

Rdte Rank

1.1 19 .7 36

.0 12 2.0 II

1.9 l.2

.5 28

.5 ]a

.0 l2 1.2 28

5.0 2 6.3 2

.0 32 1.1 21

2.2 1 1.1 11

.0 32

.0 41

.0 32 t.2 25

.Q l2 t.7 11

2.1 10.6

.0 32

.0 41

--.. ---------- .. ---------------.. _---_._--------------------------------_ ... _--------- .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ ... _- .... --------------------I Continued Oil no" paye. I

I;'FlE I~A

t~um

DUTCHESS

ERIE

ESSEl

fRANKLIN

co fULTON I

lO ......

GENESEE

GREENE

HAHILTDN

HEHKIHE9

JEffERSON

WIGS

LEWIS

LIVIN6Sl0H

hew COURI [O"""H(NIS TO STATE PRISON kATES PER W6,OOO POfULhTlON AND RAlf kANI:S BY OffENSE IYPE AHO COUNIY fOR 198~ AND 1986 - Conlinued

'/eu

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 m~

1m 19&j

1986 19E5

1986 1%5

1986 19u~

1986 1995

1986 19~5

1986 1995

1986 1985

1986 1985

lolll TolJI

n.le R.nt Rale Rank

21.4 42 11.2 JO 2~.9 31 13.3 27

31.8 31 16.0 26 32.2 22 15.9 21

16.5 51 2.B 57 24.7 35 8.l 4G

11.7 5& 1.6 53 25.1 31 : 6.9 4l

42.1 21 46.9 11

20.1 \I 21.1 29

26.1 J7 26.5 30

100.0 4 20.1 H

7.5 61 11.1 55

18.6 15 19.1 27

121.6 920&

19.B 45 7.9 S9

JO.7 Jl 25.7 II

9.2 J6 16.2 22

S.I 51 10.2 JS

11.9 lJ 7.2 42

20.0 11 .0 W

1.5 61 3.0 5b

16.5 8 12.1 29

15.2 59.0

11.9 31 .0 60

10.2 37 13.7 26

1I0oICIde

Rile RanI

.8 3D

.0 Jb

1.5 J2 2.0 n

2.B 16 .0 Jb

4.6 I 2.1 15

I.B 26 1.6 7

1.1 2B 1.7 21

2.4 19 .0 36

.0 U

.0 ::6

.0 13 1.5 30

4.1 6 2.3 16

11.9 10.0

.0 4J

.0 H

.0 41 l.t 8

Violent felonies

Sex 011 ensu

Rile Rank

1.9 40 2.1 24

3.2 2l 2.1 2S

.0 51 2.B 21

.0 51

.0 47

3.1 19 1.8 11

.0 51

.0 17

2.4 15 4.8 9

20.0 I .0 47

1.5 4l .0 17

12.1 1.9

4.1 11 I. Y 14

.0 51

.0 47

5.1 12 5.1 1

Rob~erl'

R~le ~anl

3.5 22 4.3 If

J.4 23 3.3 17

.0 n 5.5 12

.0 4l

.0 40

.0 n

.0 40

.0 n 1.1 30

1.1 9 .0 40

.0 43

.0 16

.0 13 1.5 II

2.2 28 .0 40

37.1 29.7

3 3

.0 41

.0 40

1.1 36 .0 40

liEU COU~T COMIlHENTS TO SIAIE Pfil50H

Burglary

Rate Rant

4.1 26 4.7 26

U 25 5.9 21

.0 51

.0 52

.0 51 4.6 27

1.7 30 9.0 10

.0 51 1.4 35

.0 51 2.4 41

.0 51

./) ~2

.0 51

.0 52

1.3 14 2.1 n

10.9 6 1.9 II

11.9 .0 52

3.4 12 3.4 31

We.~on5

R.te RanI

1.& II .4 21

1.0 11 .6 16

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 23

.0' 25 1.4 6

.0 25

.0 13

.0 2S

.0 23

.0 25

.& 23

1.1 i6 .0 23

1.£ b.1

.0 25

.0 23

.0 25

.0 23

Other

R,t. Rank

.8 14 1.2 34

2.1 21 1.4 30

.0 37

.0 40

.0 37

.0 40

.0 31 1.8 25

3.4 10 .0 40

.0 37

.0 40

.0 l1

.Q "i

.0 11

.Ij \1)

3.3 II .0 40

2.9 II 3.2 Il

.Q 37

.u II)

.0 31 1.7 2e

Total

R,te Rank

1.6 40 1.6 40

4.3 24 1.9 J9

.0 51

.0 46

U 23 .0 46

5.5 20 9.0 18

.0 51 1.4 25

2.. 35 7.2 IS

.0 51

.0 ~6

1.5 42 .0 46

1.1 47 2.3 14

24.5 19.0

.0 51 4.0 21

1.7 'J9 ~.I 11

Drug felonieS

Possession

Rile R •• k

.4 36

.0 32

2.1 19 1.2 26

.0 11

.0 32

2.3 IS .0 32

I.B 21 .0 12

.0 37

.0 32

2.4 14 l.B 8

.0 17

.0 31

a.:i 25 .0 J2

.0 37

.0 12

5.2 8 4.1 II

.0 37

.0 l2

.0 31 1.4 12

51!!

R,te Rank

1.2 J5 1.6 31

2.2 28 .6 40

.0 U

.0 U

2.1 27 .0 U

3.7 22 9.0 7

.0 41 l.t 18

.0 U 2.4 24

.0 43

.0 42

.0 41

.0 42

1.1 JQ 2.3 26

19.3 14.9

.0 41 4.0 15

1.7 32 I. 7 31

Ot~~r

felpoles

nah kank

6:6 54 10.2 4Q

11.0 39 1l.7 26

n.8 21 11.6 25

4.6 57 IB.3 16

20.1 15 16.2 19

13.6 2B 10.2 42

II 9 36 /2.1 32

80.0 2~.1

4.5 58 10.5 38

21.0 11 14.1 2l

19.7 11 13.4 27

1.9 50 4.0 56

l7.1 22 6.9 51

Youlhful Offe~deri

Rale Rank

.0 J2

.S 35

.6 25

.8 14

.0 32 2.6 10

.0 32

.0 41

1.3 S.4

1.1 Il l.t 6

.0 32

.0 41

.0 32

.0 H

.0 32

.0 41

.0 32

.0 41

2.2 1.4 22

.0 32

.0 41

I. 7 12 .0 41

.... -- -_ .... --- -_ ................. --------------- .... ---_ ...... -_ .. ---- .. ---- .. --------- .. -------------------------_ .. - --.. -- ..... -----_ .. --- --_ .. ----_ .. -_ ..... ---_ .... -- -- -- -_ .... -_ .. ---- .. ------------_ ...... -----_ .... -' . ------------------------ ............ ---- .. --- .., .. -----

t Continued on next p~ge. I

!Moll 101,

COUNIY

H.DlSON

HONROE

nONTGOMERY

NASSAU

c::' HEW YORK 1.O N

NIAGARA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

ONIARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

OTSEGO

~LW COURI COH~I1HlNrS 10 SIAIE PklSOII kAlES f'Ek 100 0°00 ~OfUlAIlON AND RAIE RIINKS bY OffENSE IYPE AND COUNlY fUR 1985 AND 198& - Continued

HEY COURI COHHIIHENIS 10 SIAIE PklSON ---- .. --------.... ----------.. - .. -------------- ----------.. --- -----_ ... -- .. -- ......... - .. --------_ .. -----_ ..... _ .. ---- -------------- ------.. -----_ .. --- .. --..... --- ... -- ~-- .... ------... -- ----- .. -------- -----------

Year

1986 1995

198& 1995

1986 19&5

198& 1905

198& 1'165

1986 19&5

I~eb 1985

198& 1185

1906 1985

1986 1m

1986 !965

1986 19&5

1966 1965

lotal lotal

R~te Rank Rate Rank

15.0 54 9.0 39 1905 46 ?O 38

57.9 10 28.0 6 42.1 16 ~2.7 10

17.3 48 11.5 36 19.0 ~e 1.9 59

H.7 18 25.5 9 16.9 19 :2u.3 I~

278.1 229.7

33.2 28 11.4 24

40.2 21 33.9 21

53.3 12 52.9 II

19.9 14 5&.9 12

43.0 19 ~io. 7 20

61.7 9 4U 11

21.7 41 ~3.5 JB

27.0 36 15.2 54

Il4.2 125.5

12.0 l2 11.5 31

2l.l II 14.4 25

27.2 29.0

22.8 IS 20.6 15

Il.5 28 16.6 21

18.0 22 15.~ 2~

6.7 46 U j6

&.8 U 5.1 48

HOI. tide

Rate Rank

.0 4l

.0 36

3.8 8 2.6 12

.0 4l

.0 l6

2.0 23 2.l H

1l.7 12.2

.9 l7 1.8 24

1.6 lO 2.B II

l.9 7 2.1 18

.0 n 1.1 n

2.5 18 1.8 26

2.6 17 .0 36

1.7 29 .6 J5

l.4 .0 J6

VlOhnl felonies

5ex Ollenses

Rate Rank

6.0 10 4.5 II

l.O 27 2.6 27

1.9 II U II

1.1 47 1.2 II

3.1 26 4.2 14

.9 40

.9 45

l.6 20 1.2 42

l.9 16 5.6 6

10.0 1 4.l 12

l.2 24 2.9 22

2.6 10 2.6 26

2.S II I. 7 \0

.0 51 I. 7 39

Robbery

Rale Rank

.0 41 1.5 12

7.1 7.4

1.9 l2 .0 40

10.' 5 1.9 1

77.5 • 1 6&.8 I

U IB l.7 16

4.4 19 2.8 20

7.l 6.9

2.2 29 .0 40

I.B 31 5.0 II

5.1 14 .0 40

.0 40

.8 38

1.7 l7 1.7 31

.Ourqhry

Rale Rank

l.O U l.O 30

6.3 IB 5.5 22

1.9 45 .0' 52

0.2 Il 6.6 16

16.0 15.0

4.1 20 l.2 j6

11.3 « l.6 • l2

0.2 12 9.5 0

2.2 U 9.7 1

U 27 U n

5.1 21 12.8 2

.B 50 5.0 25

1.7 n 1.1 48

Uupons Other Tokal

Rilf Rank R.le Rank· Rate Rank

.0 25

.0 21

1.9 0 2.0 10

1.9 6 .0 2l

1.9 7 .8 14

U.S 15.3

.0 25

.5 20

.0 21 1.2 13

1.5 12 l.S 12

2.2 5 .0 2l

.0 25

.4 22

.0 25

.0 21

.8 19

.0 23

.0 25

.0 21'

.0 l7

.0 40

5.4 4 2.7 19

l.8 .0 41i

2.0 22 I.l 33

10.l 9.9

1.4 30 I. 4 l2

1.6 27 2.8 18

2.4 10 3.4 9

5.4 5.4

1.4 29 1.8 26

2.6 16 .U 40j

.0 37

.8 38

.0 n

.1) ;0

1.5 41 .0 46

6.5 IB 2.1 lO

l.S 27 1.9 3B

0.5 It 6.3 Ib

77.l 51.4

2.0 l2 2.0 29

2.4 l4 1.2 26

5.0 21 l.7 22

B.7 Il 10.6 9

16.0 7 9.0 II

2.6 Jl 2.6 11

.0 49

.0 44

6.0 16 5.1 16

Drug felonies

Possession

Rale Raok

.0 31

.0 32

2.l 16 .7 11

l.8 10 1.9 10

2.0 20 1.2 21

20.2 1l.0

1.4 26 .0 l2

.4 l5 2.0 16

2.2 11 1.3 24

1.1 n 5.4 6

8.9 • 4.l III

.0 37

.0 12

.0 l7

.8 29

1.7 24 3.4 13

~ale

Rale Ralli

1.5 l3 .0 42

4.3 10 2.0 29

.0 4l

.0 42

6.4 12 5.1 II

57.2 39.5

1.4 l4 2.B 19

2.0 30 1.2 lB

2.0 25 2.4 25

~.6 10 5.4 II

7.1 II t.1 II

2.~ 26 2.6 20

.0 40

.0 42

5.1 II 1.1 12

other felonies

hate Ran~

l.O 61 9.0 46

21.9 II 15.5 21

Youthful Oflenders

Rate Rank

1.5 15 1.5 20

1.1 17 1.1 24

1.9 62 .0 32 11.4 l4 l.S 4

l2.B l2 ·.9 21 9.145 1.2 ~7

62.1 49.4

10.0 20 16.6 15

12.5 34 11.0 2~

20.1 16 10.5 9

10.~ 19 l7.l Il

12.0 II 11.2 11

41.1 1 20.4 7

14.2 25 12.& 29

II.B 17 l.4 56

4.l l.4

.5 30'

.5 19

2.0 10 1.6 18

1.1 18 1.7 15

.0 32 2.2 12

.7 24

.0 41

.0 32 1.6 II

.0 l2

.9 3l

J. 7 14 l. 7 16

I CUlltlnued 011 oe,t page. I

Wl( lOA HEW COURI COHhllHEHIS 10 STAlE PRISUN RATES PER 100,0;)0 POPUlAlIUH AND RATE Rf,NI:S ~Y OFfENSE IYPE AND COUNTY fOR 1985 AHD 1996 - Continued

IIEY COURT COHHllnEHTS 10 STAlE PhlSOII -------------- -.. -------.. ---- ---_ .. _--_ ...... _- --------_ ... _--- -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ----........ ---_ ... _- -----_ .. -_ ..... --- ------------- .. -----.. -------- ------------

COUIHY

pUTHAH

QUEENS

RENSSELAER

RICHMOND·

Year

1986 1985

1986 19Es

1986 1965

1996 1905

co ROmANO , 1996 1965 .;:)

w SI. LAWRENCE 1986

1985

SARATOGA 1996 1905

SQIIEHECT AOY 1986 J9B5

SCHOHARIE 198. 11,,5

SCHUYLER 198. 1985

SENECA m6 19d5

STEUBEN 1986 J905

SUffOLK 199. l~tl5

Tolal

Rale Rank

20.2 35 22.1 42

9S.9 58.4

21.1 4l 23.1 40

lold

Rale Rank

4.9 52 4.9 49

41.3 33.6

7.3 41 12.6 29

39.5 26 20.0 16 30.0 25 : 19.8 17

42.5 20 16.5 24 31.7 23 11.7 H

18.6 46 4.4 51 18.5 19 S.3 H

17.1 50 6.7 45 19.2 47 10.5 11

24.0 39 13.3 29 24.6 31 10.6 33

10.1 59 6.1 44 21.S 39 21.S 9

21.0 40 11.2 21 17.1 52 .0 60

37.4 27 '12.5 JI U 58 3.1 ~5

15.5 51 4.1 55 24.7 36 11.1 ]2

42.0 23 18.4 20 41.8 15 21.4 13

Haaiclde

Rate Rank

1.2 34 1.2 32

3.2 II U 6

2.0 25 2.0 20

4.S 5 2.9 . 10

.8 J9 1.5 29

.0 4l

.0 36

.6 41

.0 36

.7 40

.0 36

.0 4l 6.1

.0 U

.0 36

1.1 12 ,0 16

.0 41

.0 36

1.6 11 I.Y 21

Violent felonies

Sex Olhn~es

Rale Rank

.0 51

.0 47

2.6 29 I.B l6

.1 50 2.0 32

2.1 39 1.9 35

1.5 42 .8 46

.'1 49

.0 47

2.4 14 3.7 19

2.7 28 7.3 4

1.4 22 3.4 <u

5.7 II .0 47

6.2 8 .0 17

2.1 39 4.1 15

2.4 1] 2.9 21

Robbery

Rate Rank

2.5 26 2.5 21

19.6 11.6

.7 42 2.0 27

1.5 1 5.9 10

.. 9 15 2.6 22

.9 19 I.B 29

1.9 Jl 1.2 31

4.1 17 2.7 21

.0 41

.0 46

5.7 Il .0 4fr

.0 41

.0 40

.0 41

.0 40

6.3 II 8.1 6

Burghrv

R4le Ranl

1.2 49 1.2 49

10.0 7 6.l 17

2.G 44 2.6 40

4.8 24 6.7 10

7.9 14 5.1 21

2.7 39 2.b 39

I.B . (6

1.7 31

2.7 3B .7 51

1.4 31 16.1 5

S.7 20 _Ii 52

1.1 35 l.1 17

2.1 13 5.1 24

6.0 19 6.1 19

Wupons other

Rat. Rank

.0 25

.0 23

2.1 3.4

.7 23

.7 15

1.3 It I.b II

.0 22

.0 23

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 23

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 n

.0 25

.0 23

.5 21

.~ 18

Rde R4nk

.0 37

.0 ~!I

3.2 12 2.0 17

I.] 31 3.] II

.5 16

.0 19

.8 15 I.S 29

.0 31

.9 17

.0 17 I. 9 23

2.1 15 .& 4i1

.0 37 :i.l 16

.0 11

.0 ";

.0 11

.0 40

.0 37 2. I 20

1.6 20 I.B 24

Tolal

Rale Rank

14.1 11.1

22.' 11.1

5 8

1.1 44 1.1 42

10.7 II 2.1 35

13.5 9 0.3 Il

1.8 37 .6 16

3.0 11 3.1 27

1.3 U 1.1 41

.0 51

.0 46

.0 51

.6 46

3.1 10 .iI 46

1.0 48 .0 46

9. Y 12 8.1 14

Drug felonies

fo~~es5ion

Rale Rank

14.1 8.7

8.1 1.4

.7 1t 1.3 21

1.1 21 .8 30

1.1 31 1.5 21

1.8 23 .0 12

.0 37 1.2 25

1:1 2B .0 32

.0 17

.0 12

.0 37

.0 12

3.1 11 .0 12

.0 31

.0 32

1.2 29 1.5 20

Sah

Rote Rank

.0 U 2.5 21

14.3 6.1

.1 42

.0 42

9.3 8 1.3 35

12.4 6.0

6 o

Other Felonies

Rale Rank

o.~ 47 6.2 52

19.7 18 12.0 Jl

12.5 31 9.3 44

7.5 51 B.6 41

12.0 35 10.2 41

.0 U 11.5 lB

.0 42 1l.2 20

3.0 21 6.7 51 1.9 36 5.0 ~4

.0 41 9.l H 1.3 36 II.! 36

.0 41 1.4 60

.0 42 .0 61

.0 41 5.7 56

.6 42 17.1 H

.0 4J 21.0 12

.0 42 &.1 53

1.0 39 9.1 45 .0 42 10.1 19

0.7 9 12.9 30 U 10· 14.2 24

Youthful Ollenders

Rale Rank

.0 32

.0 41

2.5 5 1.0 14

.0 32

.0 41

.S 27

.1 {O

.4 31 1.5 19

.9 22

.0 41

.6 26

.6 37

.0 32 1.1 2J

.0 12

.0 41

.0 12

.0 41

.0 32

.0 41

1.0. 20 3.1 8

.8 13 1.1 32

---------- .. -----~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. -------------------------------------------_ ..... -------------------I Cunlinucd on nell page. I

lI,~LE IvA !llW COURI (0"1111"£1115 TO SlATE PRISUIi R~IES PER IOO.Ou9 POPULATION AND HAlE RANI:S ~y UfHNSE TYPE AND COUN1Y fOR 1985 AND IY06

NEW COURI COHHIJijEHIS 10 SIAIE PRISOII ----~-----.. --- - ...... _-----.. --.... _-----_ ... _--- --_ .. _ .. _--- .... - -_ .. _-- ... ------- -------------- ----------_ .. -- -_ .. -------- ... -- -------------- -------------- ... _-----------.. - .. ------------ _ ..... _-------- -

[uUf<lt

SULLIVAN

1l0GA

TOMPKINS

ULSTER

OJ I WARREN '0 .po

WAS~lfiGIOH

W~YNE

WESICHESIER

WYOnlNG

YAlES

ledr

1m I~B5

1906 1985

1986 19i15

1906 1m

1906 1M

1906 IYBj

IY86 1m

1m 19u5

iY06 1%5

IY06 l'JaS

NEWYORY-STAIE 1906' 19~5

li£HYORKCI1Y 1906 1\'!J~

Totdl

~ate Rdnk

65.6 93.2

29.' JI 25.0 J2

J2.0 JD 22.7 41

42.0 22 10.2 IJ

lli.O 47 10.& 57

15.0 52 5.J 61

25.0 30 10.l 50

H.O 16 64.0 6

17.2 49 17.2 51

n.D 29 21.9 ::a

04.0 HA W.l flA

141.1 HA 115.4 NA

Tolal

kale ~ank

24.8 II 20.1 0

1.0 10 6.0 4S

18.3 21 9.1 J7

19.5 18 2o.a U

7.2 42 3.6 ~2

5.3 50 U 53

13.6 27 5.7 46

23.5 13 37.9 4

2.5 SO 2.5 51

10.9 19 IB.6 IB

43.7 NA J9.l IIA

BO.4 flA 6Y.6 /IA

HOlicide

Rate Rdnk

2.9 Il 3.0 9

.0 41

.~ . 36

1.1 36 .0 36

.6 42 I.B 25

.0 41

.0 lb

1.8 27 .0 Jb

.0 43

.0 36

2.9 14 5.2

.0 41 2.5 Il

.0 41

.6 36

5.3 UA 4. 9 UA

10.1 AA Y.2 UA

Violent felonin

Se. Ollense~

Rdle kank

1.3 B.9

.0 51

.0 ,41

2.3 3. 4.5 16

1.3 16 4.3 U

l.6 21 .0 47

.0 51 1.8 38

2.1 37 1.1 14

3.1 25 4.0 I.

2.5 32 .0 47

U 15 .0 47

l.l HA 2.9 HA

4.0 UA l.2 UA

Robbery

Rite R,nk

S.B 12 J.O 19

2.0 31 2.0 n

2.3 21 .0 40

4.9 • 16 l.1 18

.0 41 I.B 28

1.8 35 .0 40

1.1 3B I. I 36

7.1 10 11.9

.0 U

.0 4~

.0 U

.0 40

20.1 HA 17.2 NA

42.0 HA 14.0 UA

Burglary

kate Rank

2.9 37 5.9 20

1.9 29 2.0 45

9.1 9 3.4 H

4.9 23 7.9 Il

l.&. 11 I.B 4.

.0 51 I.B 47

9.1 10 2.3 42

7.1 15 10.7 3

.0 51

.0 52

9.4 9.3

B.I NA U lIiI

11.1 UA 9.3 N~

Weapons

fiile ".ok

I.S Il .0 13

.0 25

.0 2J

1.1 15 .0 23

1.8 9 .6 17

.0 25.

.0 23

.0 25

.0 21

.0 25

.0 23

.0 20 J.l B

.0 2S

.0 23

.0 25

.0 23

1.1 UA 3.B UA

7.6 UA B.b UA

other

Rat. kank

4.4 7.4

2.0 23 2.u 21

2.3 19 1.1 3b

1.0 Il 3.1 14

.0 11

.iI 40

1.8. 25 .0 40

1.1 11 1.1 35

2.2 20 2.9 15

.0 J7

.0 46

4.7 9.1

3.2 UA 3.2 II~

5.0 NA 5.1 1Ii1

lohl

Rit. Rink

16.0 25.1

3.9 24 2.0 31

1.1 45 2.3 31

6.1 11 1.3 19

.0 51 3.6 21

1.0 38 .0 16

1.1 46 3.1 24

7.. IS B.4 12

.0 51 2.5 32

1.1 22 .0 I.

18.2 HA 3.1 Hn

35.3 un 23.0 UA

nruq folonles

foss.s5Ion

Rate Rink

1.4 B.9

9 2

.0 31 2.0 11

1.1 30 1.1 28

1.8 22 1.0 19

.0 ~1

.0 32

.0 37

.6 32

.0 17

.0 3~

2.9 12 3.2 It

.0 11

.0 .2

.0 17

.0 31

5.0 NA 1.4 UA

U NA 5.9 IIR

Sate

Rate Rank

11.7 16.J

1.9 19 .0 U

.0 43 1.1 39

4.9 15 2.4 n

.0' U 3.6 16

1.8 31 .0 42

1.1 16 1.' 17

•• 5 17 5.2 12

.0 U 2.5 22

1.1 16 .0 42

OIhtr felonies

kale R.nk

21.3 10 31.0

17.6 21 11.9 II

10.1 41 11.3 35

Ito 26 no

10.8 10 J.6 51

0.8 46 1.8 6u

10.2 42 B.O 4B

10.5 23 IU 17

14.1 21 12.J 30

9.1 Il 9.3 n

1l.2 UA' 20.6 IIA .0 II~ 16.5 Nn

26.0 Hn 2B.1 un 11.2 IIA 2'i.o IIA

Youthful Ol/enders

R.t. Rink

1.5 16 3.0 9

.0 32

.0 U

2.3 6 .0 41

l.a II 1.2 2b

.0 32

.0 II

.0 32

.0 U

.0 32 1.1 lO

.5 29 1.2 29

.0 32 .0 41

.0 12

.0 41

1.7 HA 1.6 HA

2.9 UA ~.I HA

........ -- .. --------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------------------------r---------------------------------------- .------ .. --------------------_______________________________________________________ _ rlOlb Dr ••• 11l chanqes In "nk ~c~re~ ~hould be Interpreted Wllh [aullon. lhe ~endllvily ~f rjl~s to relallVely s .. 11 ch.ng.~ In dbsolule nu.hers Increases as Ihe slle 01 Ihe population d.cre.5~5.

for eu',ple, dn IncreaSf Dione III in a ql',en activity In • counly .ilh 5.000 r.sidenl£ .111 C1"~e th. valu. 01 the rat. to IRCr.l~e by 20 •• hil. an Incrus. 01 one III in a counly .ilh 5tl,6~u resld!nl. "Ill Cduse Iht value 01 H,e rale to increase by only tHO 121.

Source: NVS V.pdrtlent 01 f.orredional Servltos.

T.1&LE luB

COUNTY

ALBANY

ALLEGANY

BROHI

BROOHE

'F CAITARAUSIJ5 lD U1

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUQUA

CHEMUNS

CIIENANGO

CLINTON

COLUMBIA

r.ORILAND

OELAWARE

1NHt1IES UNDER CUSTODY IN STATE PRISON ON DECEHbER 11 RAIES PER 100,000 POPULATION AND RAlE RANKS BV OfFENSE TYPE AND COUNn fOk 1985 AND 1986

Yedr

1986 19i1S

1986 1965

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 lyeS

1986 1m

1986 1985

1986 1995

1986 1705

1986 1965

INHATES UNOER CUSTOOV

Violent felonies

Total lotil 11011 ci de 5 •• Olfen~es Robberv Burglary Uupons other

Rale R.nk Rale R.nk Rate Rank Rah Rank RAle RanI Rale Rank Rale Rank Rate Rank

239.2 250.5

11.9 62 JI.B 61

m.l 432.1

128.4 Ill. 0

5.9 62 7.9 59

22.6 10 26.0 20.1 10 29.2

1.0 54 .0 60 3.9 51 2.0 55

361.5 m,4

2 92.5 32.5 29.1 2 BU

16.1 40.2

.0 S5

.0 52

160.0 165.7

22.9 22.9

.0 S6

.0 54

6.0 5.6

.0 12

.0 32

11.2 16.1

l' 21.8 1 24.1

Il.B 12.1

2.0 45 2.0 4J

19.5 19.2

m.l Il BI.I II 14.2 25 16.6 IJ 21.1 12 21.S 1.4 24 5.1 22 109.1 11 12.0 12 II.B 29 11.2 9 21.2 Il IB.4 .9 20 6.6 20

29.3 51 15.2 57 2.1 59 4.7 51 31.6 51 15.2 53 1.2 59 5.9 40

102.6 19 41.6 26 1.S S5 It..l 14 61.6 32 2B.B 41 I.l 58 S.S 26

n.1 SI 23.1 48 14.1 21 43.1 49 22.2 to 12.5 2t

201.1 187.0

120.2 IIS.5

26.5 21.9

36.0 55 26.0 46 14.0 26 H.O U 32.0 31 10.0 II

51.0 41 20'.9 50 4.9 49 52.74122.149 1.151

2. I 55 J.4 58

27.6 31.S

2.0 56 1.0 t9

4.9 t9 7.1 32

95.6 24 16.2 16 0.2 39 19.B 97.1 16 4!.l 2B 6.6 12 16.~

75.9 20 29.5 40 4.2' 53 .0 60 lB. I ?7 2905 39 4.2 52 2.1 51

23.1 59 12.1 60 •• 2 52 6.4 40 17.1 60 10.1 50 2.1 j. 6.4 37

5.9 2B 1.2 55 .0 32 1.2 51 B.2 24 .0 54 .0 32 .0 52

1.5 26 11.1 25 .0 12 B.O 11 7.5 21 6.1 40 .0 32 ~.O 28

1.4 51 2.0 51 .0 12 2.1 44 2. I t5 4.9 42 .0 32 1.4 49

14.4 16 16.5 2.2 16 ~I.O

10.5 14 2B.1 2, •• 1 9 12.0

4.0 14 .0 56 B.O 25 .0 54

3.7 35 4.9 45 6.1 29 3.1 t7

1.6 50 4.9 H 3.1 40 9.9 .29

.0 55 0.4 13

.0 52 :!.1 56

2.1 46 .0 56 .0 52 .0 54

.0 32 6.0 10

.0 32 10.0 10

.0 12 2.5 41

.0 J2 1.2 5.)

.0 12 .6 :;2

6.3 U

.0 12

.0 32

1.6 47 5.6 2~

10.5 10 It.a 4

.0 51 2.1 tl

Drug felonies

lolal Possf55ioD Sale

Rite Rank Rite Rinl Rile Rank

40.6 4B.l

.0 55

.0 55

19.4 19.4

.0 U

.0 U

21.2 2B. Y

.0 49

.0 51

&2.1 50.2

1A.1 13.1

4 46.1 2 2 3 36.5

10.0 20 5.2 29

1.2 54 1.2 51

5.0 11 3.a 39

2.B 4& 9.1 15

2.2 40 2.2 41

4.0 31 4.0 13

4.9 31 2.5 4b

39.5 33.0

4.1 15 2.4 27

.0 43

.0 42

.0 41 1.3 30

.0 43 5.5 II

2.2 JI 1.1 41

2.0 32 2.0 31

.0 41

.0 42

14.0 A.6

£.l 28 4.2 17 2.1 49 • 2.1 3i1

.0 55 .0 U 2.1 49 .0 n

5.2 22 2.B 3J

1.2 46 1.2 41

5.0 '24 2.5 35

2.0 11 4.2 24

.0 49 1.1 .a

2.0 42 2.6 42

4.9 25 2.5 37

21.1 26.4 5

2.1 41 .0 51

.0 49 2.1 41

othor felonies

Youthful 011 enders

Rlh Rank Rale Ranl

49.2 69.0

5.9 60 2.0 62

39.1 29.0 J4

42.2 6 32.0 12

12.9 40 14.1 46

J.I 21 2.1 15

2.0 12 2.0 10

4.t 4.l

.0 Jl

.5 39

.0 Jl 1.2 31

40.1 1 10.0 30.1 13 5.0

11.9 50 11.0 51

6Y.6 62.0

£.C 59 B.O 56

27.1 20 21.0 20

IU JI 21.1 2b

35.9 II 40.1 7

10.6 51 I.l 60

.0 11

.0 42

1.1 4.3

.0 lJ

.0 n

.0 II 1.2 30

.0 II

.0 i2

4.2 6.l

.0 11

.0 42

---- .. --_ .. _------- .. -- .... _--- .. -----------------------------------------------------------------------"----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ ... _-- .. ------I CUlIlllIUfd un ne,l p~g •• I

T",LE '"&

CiiUNTY

DUTCHESS

fRIE

ESSEI

fRANKLIN

'f fUll ON lD 0"\

GENESEE

6REEIlE

HAHI110H

HERKlnER'

JEffERSON

KIIlGS

LEWIS

LIVINGSTON

IIIMI£S UH~Ek CUSTODY IN STATE PRISON ON DECEHOER 31 RnTES PER 100,000 POPUlAIIOll AND ~ATE RilIlKS BY OffENSE lYfES hN& COUNrt fOR I~H5 jlllD 1906 - CDntlnued

Velr

1906 19B5

1986 1905

1986 1965

1986 1965

1986 1985

1986 1965

1906 1965

1986 1965

1906 1905

1996 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

19B6 19B5

INHAlES UNDER CUSTOS'{

Yiulenl felonies

Told Totd lIoAlcide Sex 011 enses RObbery Ourgt.q· We.pons Other

R~te Ran~ Rale Rank R.te Rank Rile Ran~ Rah R.nk nale R.n~ 'Rate R.nk Rale Rank

67.B 11 49.1 24 12.9 30 Y.O 30 1t.4 15 0.2 34 I.A 21 • 1.1 30 71.0 29 40.2 21 1t.8 30 7.8 29 11.5 16 Y.4 10 1.2 24 1.5 Jl

99.6 21 69.2 16 21.Y 12 11.4 2J 15.] 14 1l.4 10 1.5 2] 5.0 20 95.S 17 65.8 16 20.0 8 9.4 21 IS.9 15 t2.6 21' 1.2 21 6.1 23

H.I 46' 22.0 49 2.B 51 0.3 ]1 11.0 21 .0 56 .0 J2 .0 5] 18.5 52 16.5 52 .0 60 5.5 41 1.1 11 .0 54 .0 32 .0 52

70.8 30 32.0 J9 n,7 20 79.9 25: 36.5 31 9.1 14

89.7 26 ]8.5 34 20.1 15 63.0 22 H.7 31 10.0 12

56.1 39 28.9 41 10.2 35 hi.l 34 40.6 29 0.5 37

66.5 J2 40.4 29 14.] 24 55.53033.8 3S 12.127

6.B JB U :\5

7.] 34 7.2 33

1.7 50 3.4 53

9.5 20 9.b 22

160.0 7 60.0 20 40.0 20.0 5 80,2 24 40.1 30 40.1 .0 59

22.4 61 13.5 59 7.5 40 1.5 59 n.v 55 1l.4 55 6.0' 45 1.5 57

B2.B 27 48.6 25 \3.2 291M 6 70.0 30 jH.4 32 12.4 25 12.1 13

4.& 32 .0 56 4.b 3. 6.9 37

.0 55 11.0 26

.0 52 12.6 20

1.7 49 6.B 38 B.S 21 IU 21

7.1 27 7.1 37 I.e 3; 7.2 35

.0 55 .0 56

.0 52 .0 54

1.5 52 1.5 54 3.0 42 1.5 53

3.3 45 6.6 39 1.1 51 10.2 2G

320.0 ~al.3

238.2 219.1

74.4 H.I

13.7 16 102.7 22.9 19.7 It.B II 9S.9

27.7 58 11.9 61 .0 60 .0 60 .0 55 11.9 22 7.9 62 .0 62 .0 60 .0 59 .0 52 .0 51

59.7 37 35.B 17 8.5 3B 11.1 10 1.7 48 B.5 12 51.9 j9 29.1 40 O.b 36 B.6 20 .0 52 10.1 25

2.3 15. 4.6 26 2.3 16 6.9 19

.0 32

.0 12

3.4 10 5.1 7

.0 12

.0 32

.0 32

.0 12

.0 32

.0 32

1.1 28 .0 12

15.7 15.6

.0 32

.0 32

.0 . 32

.0 32

.0 53 1.8 45

5.1 24 5.1 ~b

2.4 13 .Ii 52

.0 53

.0 52

1.5 48 1.5 46

1.4 30 2.3 40

B.6 12 8.7 II

.0 53

.0 52

.0 53 1.7 46

Drug felonies

Total fQS~eS5iDn Sale

Rale Rank Rate Rank R.le Rank

4.7 lS 3.9 36

7.2 26 3.9 37

.0 55

.0 55

9.1 21 b.9 23

11.0 18 9.0 16

3.1 41 5.1 30

7.1 27 1.2 22

.0 55

.0 55

1.5 5] .0 55

.0 55 3.4 42

46.0 34.7

4.0 38 4.0 31

B.5 23 B.6 II

1.6 39 1.2 40

1.6 20 2.7 21

.0 41

.0 42

6.B 10 4.6 16

1.8 36 I.B 31

.0 41

.0 42

4.S 14 1.8 It

.0 U .0 12

1.5 40 .0 42

.0 41

.0 U

10.0 1.6

.0 13

.0 42

3.4 22 3.1 16

J.1 16 2.7 l3

J.5 32 1.2 46

.0 t9

.0 51 . 2.3 40 2.3 40

9.2 15 1.2 II

3.4 31 5.1 20

2.4 39 2.1 38

.0 49

.0 51

.0 (9

.0 51

.0 49 l.4 21

36.0 27.2

1.0 28 4.0 25

5.1 23 5.1 19

Olher felunies

"oulhful OffendErs

Rdle Ran~ Rale Rink

14.0 46 IB.O 36

22.4 27 21.8 23

22.0 29 19.2 II

2~. 7 17 31.] 9

31.1 16 28. Y 1~

20.4 33 15.2 42

19.0 36 14.5 15

100.0 2 10.1 6

7.5 58 1l.1 IB

31.2 11 27.1 19

31.1 14 2&.2 16

11.9 51 1.0 61

15.1 1\ 17.1 11

.0 II

.B 3b

.8 26 1.0 .3.

.0 11 2.8 10

.0 1] 2.3 12

9.2 5.4

3.1 3.1

.0 II

.0 42

.0 13

.0 42

.0 11

.0 12

.0 3] 1.1 II

2.7 V 2.3 Il

.0 33

.0 42

.0 13

.0 42

_~ __ ... _ 4 • _____ • ______ .. _. ____ • ______________________________________________ ... ______________________________________________________________________________ ... ________ .. __________________________________________ .... ______ .. _______ _

I COJlIIJlIlf:J un nnl page. I

ma loB

COUIIIY

HADISON

MONRUE

MONIGOMERY

NASSAU

OJNEW YORK I

lO -...,J

NIAGARA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO.

ORANGE

ORlEAIiS

LSWEGO

OTSE60

INHAlES UNDER CUSIOD\ IN SlAIE PRISON ON OECEMBER 31 fiAIES PE~ 100,006 POPULAllON AND RI.IE RANKS BY OfFENSE.m·ES ANP COUIIIY FOR 1995 t.NO 1906 - Contlnu.a

Ye.r

1986 1m

1906 JOte:;

19Bb ms

199b 1985

1906 19E5

1906 ms

1900 1,85

1906 1m

1m 1m

1906 1m

1906 ms

1986 1985

1906 1965

JllKAlE5 UNOER CUSIODY

Violent Felonies

lo!al lol~1 lIollClde S .. Off.nses Robbery Burglary Wupoos Other

R.t. Hank Ral. H.nt Rale Raot Hat. H.n~ R.te R,nt Rate ftJo~' R.t. R,ot Rate Rant

37.S 52 27.0 41 4.5 51 10.5 2i 1.5 51 1.5 '15 40.~ 50 21.0 45 4.5 51 10.5 J7 3.0 41 4.5 41

139.8 12 93.7 22.2 11 12.7 Ii 26.8 11.1 Il 12905 10 B7.B 20.3 11 IG.a 16 20.2 16.2 12

lB.4 50 28.8 42 11.5 3~ 45.1 1~ 22.B 41 11.1 II

114.1 16 11.2 12 15.0 22 98.0 I~' 69.0 1l 13.6 13

m.B 129.3 95.7 610.6 4'i6.~ B6.6

92.7 25 54.1 2l IB.I 91.0 19 51.3 IB i6.2

17 17

U 52 I.Y H J.B 47 loS 51 1.9 41 3.8 45

5.4 46 11.1 18.6 10 5.6 11 21.a 17.1 10

16.6 12 220.0 10.0 15.~ 1 201.1 le.6

6.9 II Il.1 IS 10.1 29 ~.7 21 10.2 21 7.1 14

97.8 21 61.4 18 16.1 20 10.1 25 11.1 20 18.5 11 01.2 21 51.1 19 tS.2 21 1.6 II 9.2 n 10.0 24

15D.5 144.2

101.1 96.l

10J.0 IS 56.1. 21 90.9 20 49.B 2G

20.7 14 19.2 15.5 10 IB.5

6.5 47 19.5 B.l :i5 Il.O 10

28.5 21.9

24.8 22.B

4.l Jl 11.9 21 I.l 11 n.o 19

111.3 15 65.0 11 11.7 IB 12.1 21 1B.1 Il 12.1 20 Pi6.9 14 6&.1 15 17.7 15 IG.l 19 23.4 11 16.9 23

111.0 11 ]2.0 14 23.1 9 5.1 11 7.7 25 10.1 21 120.! II 63.9 17 11.9 13 7.7 30 5.1 J3 12.0 19

51.0 42 2&.9 45 6.7 Ib 5.9 1\ 5.9 29 5.9 11 4U U 2&.6 H 5.0 49 4.2 46 1.6 2b 6.7 30

H.1 15 16.9 56 6.0 14 5.1 4B 3.1 4l I. 7 53 43.0 40 15.1 54 5.1 10 L7 36 1.1 4~ 1. 7 52

.0 12 3.0 39

.0 12 1.5 41

'.1 7 10.7 9 1.1 10 6.2 II

1.9 20 U 21 .e l2 1.9 H

2.6 12 4.5 29 1.1 16 j,2 35

n.o 1L2

1· 24.0 I 23.1

1.4 2.B

25 1.1 l2 25 II 5.1

2.0 19 6.4 17 1.6 19 6.B 19

4.1 B 6. V 15 3.9 II 1.S 15

2.2 17 11.9 2.2 11 9.1 12

.4 II 4.l 31

.7 1b 5.0 27

2.6 11 23.1 2.6 15 IU

.0 12 2.5 40

.6 32 ~.5 17

.0 12 .6 53

.0 j2 .;, 52

Drug felooles

lolal P05~ession Sale

. R~le Raot Rile Rank Ritt Rank

1.5 52 1.5 51

10.1 19 &.1 26

1.B H 3.0 lB

17.2 1l !l.5 13

m.7 111.6

5.1 30 5.5 27

B.5 21 1.6 20

B.6 22 B.O 1B

16.3 14 10.S 14

27.7 19.6

7.7 25 7.1 19

l.3 H 2.5 4i

II.S 17 6.7 ~5

.0 U 1.5 45

.0 12 1.5 ,15

1.8 18 6.3 1B 2.l 29 1.4 n

l.B 19 .0 49 1.6 11 .0 51

3.0 29 11.1 11 2.4 25 11.1 16

34. Y 111.8 26.0 91.0

1.9 15 3.2 15 32 2.6 22 2.9

3.2 27 S.2 21 1.2 20 1.4 21

3.2 26 5.4 20 2.1 26 5.6 15

5.4 12 10.8 1l 5.1 12 5.1 17

12.1 7.2

5.1 1l 5.1 Il

1.1 1B I. 7 15

l.1 21 3.4 19

15.6 10 12.6 0

2.6 lS 2.6 l4

1.7 H .0 50

9.1 17 1.4 2a

Other Felonies

~outhful

011 enders

Hale aao! R.te h.ot

7.5 51 1l.5 41

11.6 12 13.5 II

5.B 61 n.1 4'i

16.5 31 14.9 Il

102.2 90.1

32.3 n.l

15 10

22.5 2b 23.5 25

36.1 10 lB.3 B

29.3 10 29.1 17

20.9 11 20.5 11i

./Ol.l IL.O

20.9 12 1903 32

16.9 19 20.2 11

1.5 16 l.S 25

1.4 IS 1.6 21

.0 ~l 5.1 2

1.3 19 1.5 24

5.1 1.9

.9

.5 24 40

2.4 10 2.0 11

1.5 15 l.9 19

1.1 20 2.2 11

.7 29

.1 41

.0 11 2.6 11

.0 II

.& 35

1.1 II 1.1 n

-.. --- .. -... ---... ------~--- ._------------_. ------------------------------------------------------ .. -------------- .. -----,..----------------------- -----------------_ .. _---------------------------------------------... _-- ... _------------( COlillnUtd all lied p.~., I

1,1bL£ 1~~

(Ollllli

PUTUM

QUEENS

RENSSELAER

RICHHOND

o:J ROCY.LANO I to 'co

ST. LAWRENCE

SARATOGA

SCHENECTADY

SCHOHARIE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

STEuaEN

SUFfOLK

INMAIES UIIDER CUSTODY IN SIAIE PRISON Uii D£C[~a£R 31 ~AIES PER 100,000 POPUlhTIOIl nND R~I[ RANYS BY OffENSE TYfES ~ND COUUTY fOft I~05 AND 198b - Conllnued

INHATES UNDER CUSTODY _______ .... ______ .. ____ • ____________ ......... ___________________________________ .. ____________ .... ___________________________ ... _______________ 4_ ----------r------ ------------- ------... -----

VOl(

198b 1965

1986 19&5

1986 1~85

198b 1985

1986 1965

198b 1985

1986 1165

1986 19E5

198b PiBS

19B6 IV65

1986 19B5

1986 1985

1986 1985

Violenl relonies .,

lolol 101.1 HOllcide Set Oflensos RObbery Durgluy NeJ~uns Olh.,

R,te Rant flale R.nt Rlle R,nt Rale Rank R.le R.nt Rale fl.nk h.le Rank Rale R.nk

63.7 35 23.J 47 12.3 31 51.9 42 23.5 46 11.1 l2

187.1 159.1

125.1 111.1

29.0 21.1

60.6 J4 40.2 II U.S 16 58.1 15 ".9 2b 11.8 It

101.. 11 76.9 \l 21.£ \l 95.2 IB: 75.2 II 11.7 16

98.5 22 54.9 22 11.9 27 BU 21 11.5 21 14.3 22

2.5 51 3.1 l. l.7 52 2.5 14

9.1 29 52.9 0.6 27 4B.B

2.£ 5l S.3 31 4.0 50 5.9 32

3.1 4B 1.1 .4£

20.4 10.2

7.1 36 8.6 3l

7.2 35 25.9 10 14.9 15 5.9 J9 26.1 10 15.5 U

b.4 39 U.5 17 18.1 12 4.5 11 10.2 20 13.. }5

39.9 48 2D.4 51 6.2 48 6.2 42 l.5 19 l.5 49 lB.B 51 1~.4 51 U 43 5.3 13 2.6 41 1.4 H

43.9 H 26.B 41 7.3 \I 9.8 27 3.7 31 4.9 46 \5.B 44 l~.l 3D 7.4 3G 9.9 26 1.9 49 &.7 32

57.9 38 19.3 12 2.1 56 14.0 IS 9.l 24 6.0 40 54,5 40 11.5 ]I 1.3 57 12.6 II 10.6 18 6.6 1~

50.3 43 40.l lO £.7 45 16.0 1\ 3.4 44 10.1 30 57.0 3b 47.0 24 6.7 41 IG.I 19 6.7 28 11.4 16

23.0 60 17.2 55 .0 60 5.1 45 5.1 lO 5.7 42 22.B 5b 5.7 60 5.7 46 .6 59 .0 52 .0 51

37.4 53 IB.7 54 9.J J6 6.2 41 .0 55 J.I 50 IB.l 57 12.2 51 b.1 41 .0 5~ .0 52 1.1 49

51.7 40 39.2 lJ 11.1 11 U.4 18 1.0 54 9.3 II 69.9 31 45.2 25 12.1 26 11.4 B. 2.1 46 10.3 2b

116.8 14 70.6 IS 15.9 21 9.B 26 23.1 II 15.9 14 112.7 12 bB.3 II 15.3 19 9.1 25 22.2 12 IU 11

.0 12

.0 12

5.4 6.5

.1 JO 1.3 22

2.7 11 3.2 12

1.1 27 1.5 20

1.2 49 2.5 19

0.1 lJ 1.7 14

5.9 19 7.3 17

4.5 28 b.2 22

1.9 46 3.4 l4

.0 32 .9 52

.9 29 .0 52

.0 12 1.2 50

.0 32 2.S 3G

2.0 I~ 5.l 23 1.3 21 2.0 U

.0 l2 3.4 J7

.0 32 10.1 9

.0 J2 .0 51

.0 32 • 0 5~

.0 32 .0 53

.0 32 .1.1 16

.0 32 4.1 3l

.0 32 6.2 21

1.1 29 5.0 25 1.1 2b 1.1 31

Drug felonies

Tohl Posse~sion 5ale

Rate R.nk Rile R.nk fiate R.nk

27.0 22.3

20.8 12 ••

£.1 19 Y.9 11

32.0 6 II.~ 20.4 !I.5 IB.3 10 6.0

2.6 47 1.3 52

12.3 16 l.7 40

21.8 II 13.6 12

1.8 50 .9 54

4.9 II 1.3 l2

2.0 49 2.0 50

.0 55

.0 55

.0 55

.0 55

l.1 45 .0 55

4.1 36 3.1 43

22.0 10 19.3 9

2.0 33 .7 48 1.3 l7 .0 51

2.4 30 M 14 1.1 ~6 2.4 39

l.t 23 IB.4 a 2.. 24 10.9 II

1.8 37 .0 42

1.2 42 1.2 39

I.l 41 .0 42

.0 41

.0 42

.0 41

.0 n

3.1 70 .0 42

.0 41

.0 U

.0 49

.9 49

3.7 30 J.I . 29

.7 H 2.~ 13

.iI 49

.G 51

.0 49

.0 51

.0 49 .6 51

4.1 27 3.1 30

3.4 25 lB.7 3.1 21 1 •• 1

Other felpl)i~s

Youlhlul Olfellde(~

Ral~ Rlnk R.te R.nk

U.5 H .0 33 6.2 51 .0 42

26.9 21 3.1 8 21.3 29 2.0 I.

17.8 38 .0 11 11.9 50 .0 12

11.9 45 .5 32 IS,B II .5 38

21.1 30 .8 28 18.9 34 1.1 l2

16.B 40 .9 25 16.S 19 I.B 21

II. £ 52 .6 II 10.5 53 .b 37

16.0 42 .7 lO 16.6 46 1.3 27

10.1 56 .0 II 10.1 54 .0 42

5.1 62 .0 II 17.1 1B .0 42

15.6 13 .0 J3 b.1 58 .0 42

10.l 55 1.0 22 IB.5 35 3.1 9

21.0 25 1.0 2l 21.8 21 1.3 20

------ .. --------_ ... ---------------------------------------------------------------- .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. --------------------------------------------------I Conllnud all ned paqe. I

1.,elL lu& IIlNo1llS UlW(R CUSIOOY III SIAIE Pf;lSOH 0/1 0[CE"8£R II RAIES PER 100,000 POPULATION AHD RATE RANY.S OY OffEliSE IYIH AlID (OUIITY FOR 198~ AND 19Db - Continued

INHATES UIIOER CUSIDDY

Vlotent hlonie~ Drug felonies

101.1 lold Hooiclde Se, Ol/en~es Robbert burqliry U •• pons other lotal Possession Sile other felonies

Youthlul Ollenders

(DUm Ye,r R~te f.anl RAl. R.n~ Hole Ronk Rale RAnk H.te Rank R.lf Ronk R.t. Honk Rde Rank Rde H~nt Hate Rank nate H,nk 9ate Rink a,le ~ant

SULLIVAN

TIOGA

10MPKINS

ULSTER

'f' WARftEH 1.0 1.0

WASHINGTON

WAYNE

WESTCHESTER

WYOHIH6

YATES

NEWYORKSTATE

NE~YORKCI1Y

1986 1905

1986 1985

1986 19B5

1986 1~9S

1986 1ges

1986 1%5

1986 1%5

198b 1995

1986 19&5

1986 1965

198t 19&5

1986 1905

150.1 11&.0

10 Bl.5 6 84.3

10 2U 10 20.1

12.5 29 43. t 21 11.0 J2 n.4 20 41.1 21 tl.9 20

21.1 23.1

S.9 4l 6.0 38

66.2 11 41.1 20 56.11120.142

6.8 42 12.6 20 &.B ~G 12.5 12

10o.s 20 60.3 19 11.1 19 11.6 22 76.S 26 H.& 22 15.3 2G 9.2 21

39.6 49 . 19.8 52 1.6 56 1.2 J6 35.9 53 19.8 50 1.6 S5 5.4 12

31.6 5& 19.J 53 B.8 31 I.B 51 17.6 50 12.3 56 5.1 H 1.0 S6

50.0 H 34.1 lB &.8 4l S.O 32 15.1 16.21.1 43 6.9 39 6.9 11

11.1 10.4

IY 19 1l.1

28

!1

U 22 11.9 2l 6.0 11 1l.9 II

3.4 41 1l.1· 11 1.1 SO 5.1 II

9.1 23 12.8 19 6.1 JO 12.2 22

3.6 30 5.4 13 3.6 30 1.2 3&

l.5 10 I.B 52 3.5 19 1.8 51

3.4 42 11.4 24 U J5 3.4 48

151.2 114.1

106.1 IQI.2

2&.3 22.6

13.4 17 31.1 23.9 2201 II. 4 15 32.9

36.0 51 1t.7 58 4.9 50 1.4 33 .0 55 .0 56 11.2 59 4.9 ~I .0 60 1.9 45 .0 52 .0 51

6&.0 11 37.1 35 .0 &0 4.1 50 .0 55 14.2 1& 65.2 .3 12.6 3& 4.1 50 4.1 1& .0 52 9.1 31

21U HA 144.1 HA 31.1 HA 12.B UA 40.0 UA 19.6 UA 195.1 II" m.B IIA ::;3.4 ~h 11.4 N~ 51.2 IIA 11.9 ~il

I.S J.O

22 11

.0 32

.0 32

1.1 26 1.1 21

2.1 14 .6 31

.0 32

.0 32

.0 32

.0 32

.0 32 1.1 25

3.6 I.b

.0 32

.0 32

11.1 Il.3

3.9 34 6.0 21

3.4 36 1.1 51

&.1 16 4.3 ]2

.0 51

.0 52

3.5 35 .0 52

4.5 27 4.6 30

1.6 II 1.5 16

2.5 42 .0 52

.0 32 18.9

.0 32 11.0

S.2 HA S.O UA 0.5 IIA 0.4 IIA

m.2 IIA nO.1 NA 67.0 UA 15.9 HA 120.1 UA 26.7 UA 11.1 UA 13.2 UA m.l tin 21!.6 Ii'; &G.I IIh !1.2 UA 113.9 IIA 24.l II~ IE.I UA 12.9 NA

21.3 3LO

5.9 29 1.0 3~

J.4 41 6.B 24

12.8 15 J.l 21

l.6 40 5.4 28

I.B 51 .0 55

J.4 42 3.4 41

19.5 12 16.6 II

.0 55 2.5 45

4.7 JI 1.1 31

J3.0 HA 26.1 Uh

1.3 0.9

2.0 JI 2.ij 12

3.1 21 2.3 29

1.3 16 I.S l3

.0 4J

.0 12

.0 4J

.0 42

.0 U

.0 U

16.0 25.1

9 6

3.9 29 2.0 U

.0 H 1.5 21

S.S 1& S.5 16

l.6 31 5.1 IS

I.B Il .0 51

3.1 II 1.. 26

6. B Ii 12.6 12 6.0 10 10.6 12

.0 41 .0 tV

.0 H 2.5 3&

.0 41 4.1 26 4.1 15 .0 51

9.0 HA 24.8 HA 6.0 ~h 1904 HA

61.0 UA 16.1 NA U.7 UA ~O.I HA 11.6 NA 36.1 NA

37.9 56.2

21.S 21 25.0 21

1U 35 21. 6 20

25.6 22 2i.n 21

16.2 II 10.8 52

10.5 51 5.3 59

12.5 4~ II.B II

21.2 19 25.0 22

n.! 2S 9.S 55

23.6 23 21.9 IB

34.3 UA 30.4 UA

45.7 IIA 36.6 Nfl

1.5 .1.5

11 26

.0 13

.0 42

2.3 11 .0 12

loB Il 1.8 20

.0 lJ

.0 12

.0 31

.0 42

.0 33

.0 42

.8 27 1.3 29

.0 11

.0 42

.0 l3

.0 12

2.1 HA 2.u NA

3.6 NA J.O UA

-------- ... ---- .. -----.----------------------- .. --_ .. _-----------------------------------_ .. _------------------ ... ------------- .. --------------.. ----------_ .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------1I0TE: Ordutlc changes in rdnl ,cores should be Interpreted wllh cdutlon. The ~ensllivlty of rites to reldtlv~ly 5 .. 11 chdnqEs in .1bsolute nuthers InCfeases dS tho sne 01 the populalaon decredses.

for e<aepl., all Illcruse 01 olle III In a glyen acliYlty in .1 county Hllh S,OuO residents Will Ciute the value 01 Ihe raLe Lo incr .. se ~y LO, Nhll. an Increase 01 nne III in, county wllh 50"jOO resldenls 1<111 (Guse the yalue 01 the rate to Inefuse by only L.o 121.

Sourte: H'IS DepJrhclII 01 Correcllonal SCf·/lces.

co I t-' o o

IABLE III'

COUlITY

ALBANY

ALLEGANY

BRONI

8ROO"E

CAn ARAUGUS

CAYUGA

CHAUTAUQUA

CHEMUNG

CHEIIAN6D

CLlIIION

[OLUNBIA

PAROLE SUPERVISION RAIES PER 100,OuO POPULATION

¥ear

1986 19B5

1986 1185

1986 1~85

1986 19B5

1986 19B5

1986 1965

1986 19B5

1986 1985

19B6 I~B5

1986 1985

1986 1985


ReleHes To Parole

Rale Ranl

B&.5 70.8

4 5

11.9 54 II.B IB

191.6 181.3

23.7 Jt J9.1 14

15.2 SO 11.7 49

21.3 41 16.3 42

20.3 H 22.2 Jo

63.0 56.5

8.0 16,1)

29.6 29.4

47.8 23.1

B

S9 II

24 24

II 13

Under Supervi si on Dunng Veirt

Rate Rank

229.0 195.5

33.7 52 51.1 39

S49.8 m.B

90.6 22 95.6 20

32.B 53 35.2 51

56.3 39 55.1 35

S2.4 n 43.7 H

144.8 9 123.9 10

40.0 51 36.0 50

13. 9 28 67.4 28

82.4 26 61.1 31

Under SupervIsion

On 12131

Rate F:ink

166.9 142.3

15.S 59 21.6 50

18U 361.1

56.9 26 66.4 20

27.0 50 17.6 54

40.1 16 35.1 37

16.1 42 31.9 44

91.1 10 60.4 II

26.0 32.0

48.0 44.1

62.6 34.1

SI 42

30 2B

21 38

IABLE liB

Tolal

Rale RJnt

84.7 27 99.1 19

.0 52 lB.S 42

112.3 10 126.7 9

151.8 t 123.2 II

.0 -52 3J.3 H

S8.9 25 22.7 to

26.7 51 47.t 41

145.0 157.9

150.0 55.6

B3.3 72.7

~o.o

51.1

-c )J

29 27

48 37

REVOtED ANO REIURHEO PAROLEE RAIES PER 1000 PAROLEES

REVOI:ED AND RETURNED PAROLEES II

Rule Violations

Rate Rdnk

IS.4 25 10.0 23

.0 36

.0 32

30.5 ~0.1

5 b

15.7 24 2U 15

.0 36

.0 32

.0 36

.0 32

.0 36

.0 32

7.6 34 17.5 24

.0

.0

16.1 J6.4

20.0 .0

36 12

23 9

21 J2

He" Arrests

Rale Rjn~

49.1 22 55.9 12

.0 49 18.5 25

31.1 lS 36.1 27

47.1 24 69.0 8

.0 49

.0 U

66.7 11 22.7 37

.0 49 31.7 30

91.6 96.5

5 2

50.0 20 55.6 13

50.0 20 .0 U

20.0 47 54.1 16

He" Felony Convictions

Rale Rank

20.0 32 25.2 26

.0 36

.0 35

42.7 14 50.3 5

8M 3 29.6 23

.0 36 33.3 18

22.2 31 .0 35

26.7 25 15.9 32

45.0 10 43.9 7

100.0 .0

16.1 3b.4

.0

.0

I 35

35 12

36 >c JJ

( Conllnued on ne.l page. I

O:J I

I-' a I~

IABlE IIA

COUNlY

CORTLAND

DELAWARE

DUTCHESS

ERIE

ESSEX

FRANKLIN

FULTON

GENESEE

GREENE

HAHILTOH

HERKIMER

P~ROL[ SUPERYISIOII ~n'ES PER 100,000 Por'UlAHON

PhROLE SUPERVISION CASES

Yeir

1986 19D5

1996 1995

1996 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1996 1965

1996 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1~85

ReI eases To Parole

Rate Rank

29,5 25 2S.3 30

6.4 60 6.4 59

3M 11 41.9 12

31.0 20 Jt5 '17

27.5 29 1.1 51

20.5 U 12.0 34

27.5 29 30.7 23

25.5 32 IS.2 H

16.6 47 9.6 53

20.0 45 .0 62

9.0 57 6.0 59

Under Supervision During Yur.

Rile Rank

BU 24 69.6 26

17.0 61 11.1 59

119.5 12 121.5 II

94.7 19 10G.6 17

60.6 l5 46.7 42

41.1 48 4S.7 43

71. 4 29 63.2 lO

62.9 II 57.6 34

40.4 50 38.6 46

20.0 59 .0 62

26.9 56 14.9 60

Under Supervi si on

On 12131

Rate Rank

61.2 24 59.1 24

11.0 58 10.7 59

80.2 14 86.2 10

66.0 ,20 62.5 22

52.l 29 33.0 41

32.0 48 20.6 51

47.6 II 43.1 29

~S. 9 32 37.1 :is

35.6 4l 24.1 48

2Q.0 54 .0 62

17.4 57 11.9 53

TABLE 118 REI'OnD AND REWRIIED P/IROLEE RAIES PER 1000 PAROLEES

Total

Rate Rank

H.b 41 60.6 n

.0 S2

.0 51

BI.4 30 129.0 8

9B.5 22 116.7 12

.0 52

.0 51

166.7 2 .0 SI

76.9 35 28.6 46

108.1 14 261.1 I

.0 52 62.5 31

.0 52

.0 SI

111.1 II .0 51

REYOKED AND RETURNED fAROLEES ..

Rule Violations

Rate Rank

23.0 11 .0 32

.0 3b

.0 32

32.6 10 35.5 10

8.8 32 19.4 22

.0 36

.0 32

55.6 .1) 32

.0 36

.0 32

27.0 12 147.1 2

.0 3b

.0 32

.0 36

.0 32

55.6 J .0 32

HeM Arrf51s

Rate Rank

23.8 46 30.l 32

.0 49

.0 4l

26.1 44 59.1 II

60.2 13 80.9 5

.0 49

.0 n

111.1 I .0 41

76.9 8 .0 41

BLI OB.2

.0 49

.0 43

.0 49

.0 41

55.6 16 .0 43

Hew felony Convictions

~ale Rank

.0 H 10.3 22

.0 36

.0 3S

22.8 30 JS.S H

29.5 23 16.~ 31

.0 Jb

.0 35

.0 36 .0 35

.0 36 28.6 :<5

.0 16 29.~ 24

.0 36 62.5

.0 36

.0 35

.0 J6

.0 35

( ContInued on ne,l page. I

co I

I-' o I'V

H,BLE IIA PAROL[ SUP£~VISION RATES rER 100,000 POPULATION

COUNTY

JEFfERSON

KINGS

LEWIS

LIVINGSTON

HADISON

HotlROE

MONTSOMERY

NASSAU

NEW YORK

HI AGARA

OIiE IDA

Year

19B6 1985

1986 1985

1m 1995

19B6 ' 1985

1986 1985

1986 1985'

1986 1985

1986 ms

1986 1935

1986 1"-< 10"

1986 ! 995


Rele~ses

To Puole

Rdle Rdnk

22.1 3B 28.2 26

117.9 104.1

3 3

11.9 55 4.c) 61

27.3 30 27.4 28

12.0 53 12.0 47

61.8 60.9

23.0 36 15.2 45

30.5 22 26.4 29

129.7 112.8

2

45.6 12 H.I II

30.2 23 31.5 21

Under Supervi si DR

During Yeire

Rde RilOk

59.6 36 54.2 37

319.4 300.7

3 3

IU 60 11.9 61

64.8 32 58.3 33

2B.5 55 30.0 54

171.5 155.6

46.1 14 36.2 (9

8U 25 H.I H

m.2 3u7.2

125.9 11 121.0 12

80.9 27 71. 8 25

Under Supervision

On 12131

Rale Ran~

37.5 40 38.4 33

218.9 202.4

15.B 60 7.9 61

14.4 34 37.7 J4

19.5 56 16.5 56

123.3 1 109.4 . 7

36.5 41 22.8 49

61.2 23 56.0 25

225.4 265.2

2

77.5 16 eO.4 11

56.3 27 5.1.3 2b

IA&LE 11& REVOI:EO AND R(lURNED PAROLEE RATES PER 1000 P(,ROLEES

Tolal

Rde R~nl

111.1 11 62.5 31

104.7 20 101.7 15

.0 52

.0 51

lB.9 34 .0 51

'105.3 1B .0 51

8B.0 26 104.8 14

.0 52 52.6 38

114,9 96.1 21

143.1 135.5

76.9 35 H.9 30

84.6 29 m.9

REVom AND RETURNED PAROLEES II

Rule Viohlions

Rate Rank

.0 36 20.S 20

33.1 7 33.6 12

.0 36

.0 32

26.3 Il .0 32

.0 36

.0 32

1l.3 2& 24.6 16

.0 3&

.0 32

2&.1 14 2l.3 17

57.1 44.9

2 5

11.0 30 11.5 30

5.0 35 ,- " ,J.'.J n

He" Arre5ts

Rale Rank

31.0 31 41.1 24'

26.4 43 2B.3 33

.0 49

.0 4J

52.6 19 .0 43

IOS.3 2 .0 4l

56.4 15 59.3 10

.0 49 52.6 17

4G.Y 21 lO.4 31

31.5 36 31.4 26

40.3 28 ·15.8 .12

5U IS 55.6 1:,\

Hew felony Convictions

Ra1e Rank

14.1 4 .0 35

H.6 12 12.8 9

.0 36

.0 35

.0 36

.0 35

.0 36

.0 35

1S.3 34 21.u 29

.0 36

.0 35

47 .9 42.6 11

54.5 S1.2

5 3

25.6 28 U 34

24.9 29 ~(I.lj

.... -. -------------- -- .. _-- --------_ ... -----,-----------------------------_ .. ( ConI I nued nn nett p.g2. I

OJ I

I-' o W

IABlE IIA PA~OlE 5UI'£RVISION ~AIES PER IQ~oOOO ~OrULATlON

COUNIV

ONONDAGA

ONTARIO

ORANGE

ORLEANS

OSWEGO

OTSEGO

PUTNA"

DUEEUS

REtlSSELAER

RICHHOHD

ROCKLAND

~eu

1986 19a5

1986 1985

1986 1985

1986 1965

1986 1985

1~86

1965

1986 1905

1986 1905

1996 1985

1986 1905

1986 I ~B5

P01ROLE SUPERVISION CASES

Rei eases To Parole

Rate Rank

49.4 10 47.9 10

ll.S 21 2B.1 21

29.5 26 24.9 31

l3.4 18 ll.2 26

21.1 39 18.5 40

9.4 59 &.7 57

15.9 48 11.1 50

68.2 64.6

l2.J 19 28.~ :!5

40.1 Il 35.3 16

16.9 46 2v. u 3B

Under Supervi si on During Yeart

Rate Rank

m.l 10 142.1 0

69.3 JO 61.1 29

89.5 23 91.9 22

IOS.4 11 92.0 21

Sl.5 41 47.B 41

21.6 51 ~~. 0 52

40.4 49 lB.3 41

194.6 18l.0

5 5

99.5 10 99.9 IB

1l4.1 14 110.5 IJ

5U JD 51.9 38

Under Supervision

On 12131

Rate Rank

10D.6 9 81.9 9

55.3 2B 36.8 l6

S8. 9 2~ 60.9 21

12.0 18 '11.5 16

41.D 35 ll.9 43

20.J 0< , ~.,J. ~

35.S 24.7

m.2 125.3

53 59

44 47

67.9 19 67.4 19

82.2 12 H,I H

39.5 l7 39.6 30)

IA[;l[ 11& R[VOI,ED AND REIURN:,D fA~OLEE RIllES fER 1000 PAROLEES

Total

Rate Rank

19.9 32 130.1 7·

79.4 3J \) 96.8 20

75.4 31 b6.7 29

1l.2 19 27.8 47

31.l 50 .0 51

71.4 52.b

60.6 32.3

40 38

H 45 •

101.1 15 115, I 13

10b.0 16 125.8 10

61.8 42 94.4 n

80.0 31 ~5. 9 34

REVOKED AND RETURNED PAROLEES It

Rule Violations

fiate ~dnt

25.1 15 45.4 4

.0 36 16.1 25

1.9 J1 19.6 21

24.4 16 .0 32

.0 36

.0 32

.0 36

.0) ~2

.0 36

.0 32

14.2 J6.5

6 3

11.2 21 13.2 28

11.1 29 21.B 19

ll.3 14.0 26

New Arrests

RAle Rink

28.2' 41 49.9 19

31.1 J5 4B.4 21l

35.7 34 23.5 j£

.0 49 21.9 J4

31.1 31 .0 41

11.4 ~ 52.6 17

30.3 J9 .0 41

28.9 40 35.9 28

46.4 25 79.5

25.1 45 21. a 3B

26.1 42 21.6 19

NeH felony Convictions

Rate F:ank

26.6 26 H.8 Ib

41.6 32. J 20

31.7 20 23.5 27

40.S 6 .v 35

.0 36

.0 J5

.0 36

.0 35

30.3 22 32.3 20

44.1 13 42.7 10

46.4 n.1 19

30.4 21 50).8 4

20.0 II 21.0 28

I Continued an ned page. I

co I

I-' o +:>

TABLE IIA PAROLE SUPE~VISION R~'ES fER 100,000 POPULAliON

COUIITY

ST. LAWRENCE

SARATOGA

SCHENECTADY

SCflOIfAR IE

SCHUYLER

SENECA

STEUBEN

SUFFOLK

SULLIvAN

TIOGA

TOMPKINS

lear

1986 1985

1m 1965

1986 1995

1m 1985

1986 1965

1986 1985'

199b 1985

19B6 1m

1986 1995

1986 1965

1986 1m


Releases To Parole

Rale Ran~

20.4 4l 22.0 J7

4.9 62 5.u 6U

26.0 31 :;3.9 19

13.4 S2 IJ.4 46

2B.7 27 34.1 IB

59.2 B2.4

15.5 49 12.6 35

37.8 15 31.1 22

51.Q 5&.3

23.S 3S 9.9 52

24.0 33 9.1 54

Under Supervision During Vur.

Rale Rank

67.1 31 60.0 32

12. e 62 17.9 SB

91.S 20 97.0 19

30.2 51 20.1 51>

92.0 21 102.8 16

190.0 11>1.9

51.1 40 54.4 36

106.5 16 83.5 23

147.2 127.2

56.9 37 37.7 48

41.4 41> 3~. 6 53

Under Supervision

On I2Ill

Ratr Rank

4S.2 33 16.7 27

8.5 62 8:0 60

61.9 22 68.~ IB

21.5 52 16.8 55

BO.5 13 62.B 21

m.7 12B.2

6 5

3S.1 46 ' 39.0 31

74,6 17 68.6 17

107.9 97.6

39.2 33.7

3S.4 19.3

a 8

3a 40

15 co J.

TA~LE 11& REVOI:£O AND fi[JURIIED PAF:DLEE RAIES PER lIiOO PAROlEES

lolal

Rale Ran~

19.5 n 71.5 26

190.5 I 10l.. Ib

105.6 17 102.7 IB

.0 52 166.7 1

62.S IJ 55.6 35

49.2 16 .0 51

m.2 9 IB.9 19

104.5 21 BI.I 25

IOB.9 13 93.0 2l

69.0 52.6

105.3 IBS.2

41 38

IS

REVOKED AND RETURNED PAROLEES II

Rule Violations

Rale Ran~

13.2 28 .0 31

.0 36 31.5 11

21.1 20 6.a 31

.0 16 166.7

.0 36

.0 32

l2.a ~

.0 32

18.9 22 .0 32

22.9 19 11.7 21

29.7 11 1J.b 29

.0 36 52.b :1

.0 36 31.0 7

/If" Arrests

Rille Rank

.0 .~ 14.7 42

95.2 4 69.0 B

42. J 26 75.3 7

.0 49

.~. 4l

62.S 12 55.6 13

1£.4 4B .0 43

56.6 14 18.9 40

16.~ 31 24,6 35

3U 29 46.5 21

69.0 .&

105.3 liS. I

10 n

2 I

HeM felony Convictions

Rate Rank

26.1 27 ~B.B 2

95.2 2 .0 35

42.3 15 20.5 30

.0 36

.0 35

.0 l6 .0 35

.0 36

.0 35

37.7 16 .0 35

45.1 II 12.B a

39.6 34.9

16 ·c I.

.0 36

.0 35

.0 36 .0 35

( Continued Oli ned plge. )

o:J I

t-' a tJ1

T~BLE 11ft PAHOLE SUPERVISION RATES PER 100,000 POf'ULAlION

Pt,ROLE SUPERVISlOrl CASES ------------------ --.. --------------- ~---- .. -... -----

Under Under Releases Supervi sion fiu~ervision To Parole Curing Yein On 1~/31

------------- -----.. ---- --- -------------mum Year f:ate hanl fide Rank ~Qtf Poanl - ... ------------

ULSTER 1996 39.0 14 112.1 IS 79.0 15 1965 3b.b 15 lU5.6 15 n.l 15

• WARREN 1986 21.6 40 48.6 41 30.6 49 1985 7.2 56 5b.3 40 27.0 46

WASHINGTON 1986 5.3 61 21.1 58 12.3 ' 61 198~ 8.8 55 19.4 57 15.9 51

WAYNE 1986 22.1 31 61.4 34 30.6 39 1985 17.1 41 b8.5 2T 38.8 32

WeSTCHESTER 1986 36.1 16 m.2 IJ 82.9 II 1~85 4~.O 13 109.0 14 78.0 13

UYOHING 1986 9.0 56 14.1 45 1906 55 1965 24,6 32 41.9 45 34.4 39

YATES 1m 14.2 51 42.5 47 33.0 47 1985 IB.6 39 27.9 55

I 27.9 45

NEW YORK STATE 1906 12.0 IIA 210.2 NA 147.3 NA 1185 67.9 /I~ 195.5 NA 137.3 ".

N[W YORK CITY 1986 115.2 IIA m.9 /lA 210.5 IIA 1905 104.4 flA 299.2 NA 201.9 ' IIA

I Ihe lotal number 01 parolees under supervIsIon during a given year; Le., parolees carried 01.r Ir04 the previous year (ca~e5 under ~upervision on Deceober 31) plus inlales relea~ed during Ihe year 10 Ihe DiVISIon 01 Parole lor Supervision.

IA&LE liB REVm:EO ANO RETURNED PAROLEE RATES FER 1UOO PAROLEES

REVOKED AHD RETURNED PAROLEES II

.. -- .. -------------- --------.. --------- ... _---------------- --------.. ----

Rule New tl~1I Fel~ny

lotal Vi 01 ali ons ftrrHts Convldions ----_ .. ------- .. ------------ ------------- -----------.. -~ate Rank Rlitc Rank Rate nank fiate f:ani'

97.0 23 10.9 31 4~. 9 23 lO.O J7 69.4 29 23.1 10 34.1 29 11.6 31

.0 52 .0 36 .0 49 .0 36 35.7 H .0 J2 .0 43 35.7 13

lA6.7 8J.J 83.3 6 .0 36 '10.9 24 .0 32 90.9 3 .0 35

14.1 . 30 .0 36 37.0 31 31.0 19 16.1 50 .0 32 16.7 41 .0 35

09.5 24 23.1 10 31.2 30 29.2 24 102.9 11 25.5 14 43.5 23 33.9 11

55.6 45 .0 36 55.£ 16 .0 36 .11 51 .0 32 .0 43 .0 35

.0 52 .0 36 .0 49 .0 36

.0 51 .0 32 .0 43 .0 35

121.0 HA 31.6 UA 42.1 NA 41.4 /lA 116.1 rIA 3U IIA 41.3 Nil 4v.O ~A

m.9 IIA 3U UA 29.2 ~A 45.0 NA 119.1 IIA 36.2 IIA 33.6 NA 47.3 IIA

.. !I.e lotal nusber 01 parolees revo~ed and returned during a gIven year.

NOTE: fira~all( clI3nges in .ank scorf~ should be inlerpreted Hilh caulion. ThE sensitivlly 01 rates to rflali'l~!y s:all changes in absolute nUAbers Increases as Ihe sIZe 01 lhe populallon decrea~es. For exa:ple. an increase 01 one 111 In a given activlly in " counly Nlth 5,OOU reSIdents HIli cause the value oj lhe rale to increase bv 20, Hhile an increase 01 one II) In a counly wilh 50,000 resldenls will c~u~e the vj!ue 01 the rate to IncreHe by nnl'( ItJo (2).

SOURCE: /lYS Dlvl~lon 01 Parole.

lADLE 12A JUI'[NIL£ DffEHD[R OISfOSllIDNS &Y lYrE Of DISPOSIIIONS AND [DUm fOR 1995 AND 1986

JUVENILE OffENDER DISrOSI1l0~5 I

-----------_ .. - .. ------ ... -- .. ------- ... ------_ .. -_ .... ---- ------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------.. _--------- ----------------Rf80ved To

[onvicll ons Arquillals Dismissals Nut Prosecuted faaily Court Other lot~1

- .. -------------- ---------------- ------------ .. --- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------mUlnv Year NUGber Percent Nu.ber Percent Hueber Percent N •• ber Percent Hueber Percent ~u.ber Percent Hu.ber Percent --------------

AL9ANY 1986 66.7 0 .0 .0 0 .0 1 25.0 1 B.l 12 100.0 1995 18.5 0 .0 .0 0 .0 0 61.5 0 .0 IJ 10u.D

ALLEGANY 199b HA HA 0 NA NA HA 0 NA 0 100.0 1995 NA HA 0 HA HA MA 0 NA 0 100.0

BRONI 19~6 72 52.6 2 1.5 30 27.7 5.1 10 7.3 0 5.0 m 100.0 19B5 89 /1.0 0 .0 21 Ib.9 4.0 3.2 5 4.0 121 100.0

BROOME 1996 HA 0 NA NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0 19B~ 11)0.9 0 .0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 I 100.0

CJ:) CAITARAUGUS 19Bb 0 IIA NR 0 NA NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0 I

t--' 19B5 0 HA HA 0 NA NA 0 "" 0 NA 0 10u.0 a 0\

CAYUGA 19B6 NA HA HA 0 HA 0 NA 0 HA 0 100.0 1985 HA HA Nn 0 NA 0 IIA 0 Nit 0 1UO.O

CHAUIAUUUA 19B6 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA NA 0 NA 0 100.0 1985 100.0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 I 100.0

CHEMUNG 19B6 HA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA HA 0 NA 0 100.0 I~B~ NA (I HA (I HA 0 NA IIA 0 IIA 0 100.0

CHENANGO 19B6 0 HA 0 HA 0 HA 0 NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 100.0 l'/u5 0 N~ 0 NA 0 NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 HA 0 100.0

[UNION 19B6 0 HA 0 HA NA 0 HA HA 0 HA 0 100.0 1985 2 100.0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 2 100.0

COLUMBIA 1986 .0 .0 0 ,0 0 .0 100.0 0 .0 100.0 198~ NA NA NA 0 HA liA 0 NA 100.(1

CoRILAND 1986 HA NA 0 HA 0 HA 0 NA 0 HA 0 100.0 19B5 UA NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 Un 0 lilt 0 100.0

DELAWARE 198b NA HA NA NA 0 PoA 0 IIA 0 100.0 19B~ J) NA NA HA NA 0 II" 0 Nn 0 100.0

-------------- .... _------------ .. _---- .. --------------_ ... _------------------------------------------ ... --------------------------------------------- ....... - .. ---------------------------------------------------------------I Conllnued on nell pag~. I

lADLE I~A JU\'ENllE OffENDER Ol5F051TIOUS bY TVPE OF DISPOSIIIDN AlID (DUNIY FOR 1985 AND I9Bb - [ontlnued

JUVENILE OffENDER OISPOSllIOHS • ----------------------_ ... ------------------------.. ------------------------- ------------------------- -------':"----------------- ------------------------ .. ----------------

R£loved To (onvi ct ions Acqui ttds oi 5li 5sals Nol Prosecuted Fuity tourt Other Totd

--.. ----- .. ------- ..... _---- ..... ------- ---- ... _---------- ---_ ... ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------

COUlItV Ye~r tlo.her PercEnt Number Percent lIuaher Perctnt Ilucber fercent NURber Percent Nuaber Percent Hoober Percent ---- .. ---------

DUTCHESS 198b .0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 100.0 0 .0 100.0 19B5 25.0 ~s.o I 25.0 0 .0 25.0 0 .0 100.0

ERIE 1986 lO.8 7.7 5 l8.S 0 .0 15.4 I 7.7 IJ 100.0 1m 8.1 4.1 14 60.9 0 .0 11 •• 2 a.7 21 100.0

ESSEl 1986 HA 0 HA 0 UA HA 0 UA 0 IIA 100.0 19B5 HA 0 NA 0 IIA HA 0 IIA 0 IIA IGO.O

FRAm:llH 1986 0 NA 0 NA 0 UA 0 NA 0 UB 0 NA 100.0 1995 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 I 100.0 0 .0 100.0

co fULTON I~D6 0 UA 0 HA 0 HA . 0 NA 0 HA 0 IIA 0 100.0 I ..... 19Bs NA 0 HA .~ NA 0 IIA 0 NA 0 NA 101i.~ 0

"'-l

GENESEE 1m NA IIA M 0 HA NA 0 UA 0 100.0 19B5 NA NA NA 0 UA HA 0 NA 0 10u.~

6REENE 1986 NA 0 HA 0 UA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0 1985 NA 0 NA Ii UA Ii NA Nil 0 Nil 0 100.0

HAHILIOH 1986 HA 0 HA HA 0 NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 100.0 1985 UA 0 Nil NA Ii Nil 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0

HlRKIHER 198b 0 UA 0 HA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 UA 0 NA 0 100.0 1m 0 NA NA 0 UA 0 UA 0 Nit 0 Nn 0 100.0

JEFFERSON 1m 100.0 .0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 .0 2 100.0 1905 NA Nn 0 IIA IIA Nil 0 NA 0 1';0.0

KINGS 198& 118 12.8 .5 89 21.1 15 a.l 151 16.l 5 1.2 421 100.0 1985 92 24.7 1.1 55 ".8 26 7,5 192 51.6 .0 112 100.0

LEWTS 19B6 UA NA 0 HA HA 0 UA HA 0 100.0 1985 Nn NA 0 NA Nn 0 Nil NA 0 100.0

lIV INGSTOU 1986 UA NA NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 IIA 0 100.0 1~65 NA NA N~ Il Nn 0 UA 0 tlA 0 100.0

.. ------~--------------------.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ... -----------------------------------------------------------------( C~ntlnu~d un R~d pagt. I

TABLE t 2A JUVElIilE OffEllDER OISPOSITIONS &Y IYPE Of OISPOSITION AlID COUNT V FOk 1985 ANO 198. - Continued

JUVENILE Off£NDER OISPOSITIONS • -------- .. -- .. ------------ --.. --- ... ------------------ ----- .. -------- ... ---_ .. _---- ---------_ .. -------------- -----------------,,--_ .. _-- ------ .. ------------------ --- ... ------------

Re.oved To Convictions Acquittals Di5lis~d5 1I0t Prosecuted fdlily Court Other Total

---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -_ .. __ ..... _-------- ---------------- ------------ .. --- ----------------[OUlIIY Velr Nuaber f'ercent Nuaber Percen! Nuaber Percent Nuaber Perten! Hueber Percen! Hu.~er Percent Nuaber Percent ------------_ ..

HADISOH 1986 100.0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 100.0 1985 HA 0 NA 0 un ·0 UA 0 UA 0 UA 100.0

NOUROE 1986 ll.l 0 .0 0 .0 .0 66.1 0 .0 100.0 1985 25.0 0 .0 I t.2 8.l 12 5~.0 1 12.5 24 100.0

NOHIGOHERY 1986 0 HA 0 HA 0 HA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 UA 0 100.0 19B5 0 UA 0 HA 0 UA I) HA 9 IIA 0 UA 0 100.0

NASSAU 190. S1.1 .0 6.1 I 6.1 1 20.0 6.7 15 100.0 i90S 50.0 .0 • 0 0 .0 • 50.0 .0 B 100.0

OJ NEW YORK 198. d7 39.2 .S 9J 41.9 II 5.0 30 11.5 0 .0 222 100.0 I

t-' I~BS B7 35.4 .4 99 40.2 16 6.5 39 15.9 3 1.2 2H luu. t) 0 0)

NIAGARA 1986 66.7 0 .0 11.1 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 100.0 1985 .0 .0 100.0 t) .0 0 .0 0 .0 10~.~

ONEIDA 1986 11.1 .0 0 .0 I 11.1 13.3 0 .0 100.0 1985 100.0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 100.0

otlONDA6A 1986 55.6 .0 22.2 0 .0 22.2 0 .0 100.0 1985 51.1 U .0 6.7 .0 40.0 ~ .0 15 100.0

ONTARIO 19B6 0 NA 0 lIA 0 UA 0 HA NA 0 HA 0 100.0 19B5 0 HA 0 NA 0 lIA ~ HA N~ 0 IIA 0 IM.~

ORAN6E 1986 UA 0 HA 0 HA 0 lIA 0 UA 0 NA 0 100.0 19B5 HA 0 HA 0 HA 0 UA 0 HA 0 ll~ ~ 100.0

ORLEANS 198. 0 UA 0 UA 0 HA 0 UA 0 lIA 0 UA 100.0 1985 lIA 0 HA 0 HA Il lIA 0 lIA 0 lIA 100.0

OSWE60 198. lIA UA NA 0 UA 0 UA 0 lIA 0 100.0 1985 IIA IIA lIA 0 Nh 0 lIA 0 II~ 0 100.0

OI5E60 198. HA HA HA lIA 0 UA 0 NA 0 100.0 1965 UA N~ lIA lin 0 II~ 0 IIA 0 100.0

-----------------~------------------------------------- .. --.. _------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ------------------------------- .. -------

( [oullnued on ned plge. I

IABLE IIA JUVUUlE OffmER 015f051 lIONS bY mE Of OISPOSJIIOH AND COUHIV FOR 1985 AHO 1906 - Continued

JUV[NILE OFFENDER 015fOSJIIOHS I

----- -~ ....... --- .. -_ ........... --- .. - ... - ....... --_ .. --- ..... --------- ---_ .. -------------------- ------------ -- ----------- ------------------------.. -- ..... -----------_ ... __ .. __ .. _- -------.... -----... -

Rtloved fo ConvictIons AcquI Uals Dislissds Nol Prosecuted Faeilr Ccurt Olber lotal

--------'"'-.. ----- -- .. ------------- -------.. -- ... ----- ------------ .. --- --------------.. - --------------- -------------.. --(GUm Ye~r l/uRber fercent Nuaber Percent Nuaber Percent NUBber Percent Mutber Percent Huaber Percent NUlber Percent -- ... -----------

PUINAH 19B6 0 IIA HA 0 • IIA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0 1985 0 UA UA 0 NA V IIA 0 IIA 0 NA 0 100.0

QUEENS 1986 60 46.9 2.l 30 2l.4 .0 35 27.3 .0 128 100.0 1995 36 31.5 2.1 23 21.0 1.0 36 37.5 .0 96 100.0

RENSSELAER 1986 NA 0 NA IIA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 100.0 1905 IIA 0 IIA HA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 101).0

RICHnDND 1986 16.7 .0 25.0 25.0 13.1 0 .0 12 100.0 1985 20.0 .0 5ii.0 20.0 10.0 0 .0 10 100.0

o:J ROCKLAND 1m NA UA NA HA 0 HA NA 0 100.0 I ...... a 1985 UA HA Nis UA 0 Nis NA 0 100.0 lO

51. LAURENCE 1986 NA HA UA 0 NA 0 NA 0 UA 0 100.0 1965 NA UA NA 0 NA 0 UA 0 UA 0 /GO. Ii

SARATOGA 1986 0 NA 0 UA 0 NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA 100.0 19U5 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 I 100.0 IG~.O

5CHENECIADY 1986 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 0 .0 100.0 1985 NA HA HA tlA Nil 0 M 100.0

SCHOHARIE 1986 NA NA 0 NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA 0 100.0 19B5 NA HA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 Hit 0 NA 0 160.0

SCHUYLER 1986 HA NA NA HA 0 HA 0 HA 0 100.0 1965 HA UA Nh HA 0 H,) 0 His 0 10u.1i

SENECA 1986 0 UA HA NA 0 HA 0 NA 0 NA 100.0 1965 0 Nis NA NA NIl 0 His 0 H" 10u.0

STEU8EN 1986 HA HA NA 0 UA HA • 0 NA 100.0 1m .0 .0 100.0 0 .0 .0 0 .U 101i.0

SUFFOLK 1986 36.1 4.5 4.5 .0 8 36.4 4 18.2 22 100.0 1983 16 30.2 .0 1.9 .0 31 58.5 5 9.4 51 100.0

--------------------------- .. ----------------------------------------------------.. _-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( C6nlinued on next pjge. I

1 "~Lf: li,l JUYLNil[ OffENOEh DISfOSllIONS bY lYPE DF DISfOSlIIONS ~ND [OUHIY fOR 1985 ANG 1986

JUI)ENllE OffENDER DISfOSlllOHS • --.... -_ .. -------_ .. ------- .. ------------------------- - ... - ...... ----....... _----_ ... _---- .. -----_ .... - .. _------------..... ------------------------ -- .. -----_ .. _------.. ------- ----------------

Ruaved la [aRvldl.ns Acqui 1I~15 Di so is sa 15 Nol Prosfculed fali I r [aurl Olber Tolal

---------------- -------_ .. _------ ---------------- ------.. --------- ---- .. _-----_ ...... _- ---------------- ------------.. ---[UUNIY Year Hu.ber Percenl NUDber Percenl N,,"ber Percenl Hu.ber Perrent Huaber Percent NUlber Percent Huaber Percenl -~~~--------~-

SULLIVAN 198& UA HB 0 UA 0 UA 0 UA 0 UA 0 100.0 1985 UA UA ~ UA 0 HA 0 liB 0 U~ 100.6

1I0GA 198& UA 0 IIA 0 IIA UA 0 UA 0 MA 0 100.0 1985 UA 0 UA 0 IlA NA 0 UA 0 liB 0 100.0

TOnpt:lNS 198b UA 0 UA 0 UA 0 HA 0 IIA 0 UA 0 100.0 19B5 UA 0 NA 0 UA 0 UA 0 NA 0 Nil 0 10~.0

UlSIER 1m 0 HA NA 0 HA 0 Hil 0 NA 0 NA 10O.B 1995 100.0 .0 0 .0 Ii .0 0 .0 0 .0 100.0

co I

WARREN 198& 0 ....... UA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 Hft 0 IIA 0 UA 100.0 t-' 1965 0 IIA 0 NA 0 UA 0 liB 0 UA v UB 100.0 0

WASIIIUGION 1m IIA 0 IIA 0 UA 0 HA 0 HA 0 IIA 0 100.0 1~85 NA 0 .UA 0 UA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 HIl 0 10u.0

WAYNE 198& 100.0 0 ,0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 100.0 1985 UA IIA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 Nil 0 NA iJ 100.0

WESICHESTER 190& 10 76.9 .0 0 .0 2 IS.4 1.7 0 .0 11 100.0 1985 14 70.0 s.o 2 10.0 0 .0 15.0 0 .0 20 IGU,

WYOKIUG 198& IIA NA 0 UA 0 UA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 100.0 1965 0 UA HB Ii IIA 0 Nil UA Ii Uti 0 100.0

YAIES 1986 0 IIA UA 0 IIA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 IIA 0 100.0 1m 0 UA Nn Ii liB 0 UA 0 UA 0 IIA 0 100.0

IlEW YORK STAlE 198& 4\0 40.2 10 1.0 26~ 25.8 60 5.9 m 25.2 21 2.1 1,021 100.0 1ge~ m JU 10 1.0 m 22.1 54 5.J m 33.6 19 1.9 1,019 100.0

HEN YORK [IIV US& 359 39.0 a .9 25] 27.5 5& 6.1 232 25.2 14 1.5 921 100.0 1~85 307 36.2 7 .8 203 23.9 52 &.1 272 32.0 B .9 849 100.0

... --~ .. ------- ... ----------.. --------..... ----------------------------------------------------------------------'f-----------.. -----------------.. ---------.. ,.. ________________ ----___________________ .. ____ .. __________ .. _______

I DI~po~llt"n data are bd~fd on Ihe year 0/ HRtenclOg lor convlclipns and on the year 01 dlsposilion lor acqultl~ls, dls.lssals, .nd 'olher' dispositions. Ihese dala uy be ~//ed.d by U.E und.rfEp"rling 0/ dl~posltlon~ 10 the Olvislon 01 Cd.lOal Ju~llce Services Isee Appendix fl.

snUke,: IIj5 DIVISion 01 Cnunal JustICe SerVices, Ariesh and Proc~~5Ing Irends File.

1ABLE 12& JUVENILE OFfENDER SEHIEHCES AS A fERCENI OF IOIAl COHVICIIOHS BY SENIENCE lYPE AHD [OUm fOR 1985 AND 1986

SENIENCES AS A PERCENI Of JOIAl CONVICTIONS I

-------------------------.. --- .. -- ... ---------------------_ ... ----- ... _------------------------------ ------------------------------_ ... ----------_ ... __ ... _-_ ....... ----------- .. --------------local JaIl lotal

roUNlY Year State faci II Ly local JaIl and Probation Probation Olher Convidions --------~----- -------------- ----_ .... _---- ------ .. -_ .. --- ------------ ------------ ------------

ALBANY 19B6 87.5 .0 .0 12.5 .0 100.0 1985 IO~.O .0 .0 .0 .0 luO.O

ALLEGANY 1986 UA tlA UA tlA UA 100.0 1965 NA tlA UA UA UA 100.0

BROHI 1986 37.5 12.5 6.9 38.9 4.2 100.0 1965 31.5 14.6 7.9 42.7 1.4 100.0

BROONE 1986 UA HA tlA UA HA 100.0 1985 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 I~O.O

OJ I CAll ARAU6US 1966 tlA UA UA NA UA 100.0

f-' 19B5 NA NA tlA UA NA 100.0 ...... f-'

CAYUGA 1966 tlA UA tlA HA tlA 100.0 1965 UA un IIA UA UA 100.0

CHAUTAUQUA 1996 uA tlA tlA UA HA 100.0 1965 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0

CHEHUNS 1966 UA tlA • UA UA UA 100.0 1965 NA HA Hli UA UA 100.0

CNEHANSO 1986 tlA tlA tlA NA NA 100.0 1965 II~ HA IIA H~ N~ I~O.O

CLINION 1966 IIA IIA IIA HA HA 100.0 1985 S(J.U .0 ; .0 SQ.O .0 100.0

COLUH61A 1966 HA IIA HA IIA IIA 100.0 19a5 IIA IIA NA IIA HA I~O.~

CORTLAND 1966 IIA IIA NA IIA HA 100.0 1905 IIA IIA HA NA IIA 100.0

DELAWARE 1966 IIA HA tlA HA HA 100.0 1965 un IIA IIA HA IIA 100.0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:.------------------------------------------I Continued on nut page. I

TAblE 128 SENTENCES AS A PERCEIII Of TOTAL CONVICTIONS D¥ SENTENCE Tm AND COUNIY fOR IY8S AND 1906 - Continued

S£NTENCES AS A PERCENT OF TOIAl COHVICIlONS I

-------- .. -------------------.... ------------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------------------- ------- .. ---------_ .. _ ..... _--------- .. _-------------loul Jail lolal

[OUNlY Yeu Slate fad I ily local Jai I and Probation Probati on Other Convictions -- .... _-----_ ...... - -------------- .. _---------- -------.. ----- ------------ ------------ ----... -------

DUICHESS 1986 NA NA HA NA NA 100.0 IY85 .0 .0 .0 100.0 .0 160.0

ERIE IY86 75.0 25.0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1985 ~6.0 .0 .0 50.0 .0 100.0

mEl 1m NA HA NA HA HA 100.0 IY65 UA NA UA NA UK 100.0

fRANKLIN 19B6 NA riA UA UA HA 100.0 1985 NA HA HA HA NA WO.O

OJ HA 100.0 I fUll OM 1986 UA HA HA HA ...... 1985 HA UA . UA UA IIA 100.0 ......

r-:> GENESEE 19B6 HA UA UA HA NA 100.0

19B5 HA IIA NA NA UA 1U0.0

GREEHE 1986 HA UA UA IIA UA 100.0 1965 UA N,\ NA M NIl 100.0

HAMILTON 1906 NA UA HA NA NA 100.0 1985 UA UA HA HA NA 100.0

flERKIHER 1906 HA UA UA UA UA 100.0 1965 HA HA HK UA HA 160.0

JEFfERSON .19B6 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1985 HA HA NA IIA NA liI •• O

KIN6S 1986 29.0 8.7 20.] 39.1 2.9 100.0 IYB5 37.0 12.0 17.4 36.4 3.3 100.0

LEWIS 1986 IIA IIA Nk IIA IIA 100.0 ]965 UA NA Nil NA Nn luO.O

lIVINGSION 1986 HA NA NA NA IIA 100.0 1905 Nil NA NA NA IIA 100.0

---------------- .. _--------------.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. _-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I CUIIlInued 011 next page. )

lotH m SEUfENC£S AS A rERCEUf Of IOfAL CouvlCIIONS &Y S£HI[U(£ IYP£ AUO (DUNn fOR 1985 AIIO 1986 - Continued

SENfENCES AS A P[RCENI Of JUIAl CONVICTlfiH5 I

------ .. ---------------------- ---- .. ------------------.. _ .. _----- --.. ------------.. ---------------- ------------------ .. ---------- ... -- _ ... _---------_ .. _-_ ..... ----------_ .. - - ... -------------Local Jill lotal

COUNIY Year Shte fmlity Local Jail and Probation Probation Otber Convictions ---- .... -------- - .. ---------- .... ------------ ------------- ------------ .. ------- ... -_ .. ------------

HADISOH 1986 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1985 NA HA Nli HA NA 10u.0

KONROE 1986 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1985 16.1 16.1 66.1 .0 .0 100.0

MONT60MERY 1986 HA HA UA NA HA 100.0 1985 NR NA fiA HA NA luO.O

NASSAU 1996 62.5 12.5 .0 25.0 .0 100.0 1985 50.0 .0 .0 25.0 25.0 luO.O

co I NEW YORK 1986 19.1 2.l l.4 55.2 .0 100.0

t-' 1985 52.9 12.6 1.1 29.9 lot 100.t> t-' w

NIAGARA 19B6 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1965 NA NA Nli HA Hli hlO.O

ONEIDA 1996 .0 .0 .0 100.0 .0 100.0 19B5 .0 .0 100.0 .0 .0 100.0

ONONDAGA 1m .0 20.0 .0 80.0 .0 100.0 1985 50.0 .0 .0 50.0 .0 100.0

ONTARIO 1986 HA HA NA HA NA 100.0 1995 Nli Nli NA. NA HA luO.O

ORANGE .1986 HA HA IIA NA NA 100.0 1995 Nli NA Nli fiA HA 100.0

ORLEANS 1986 NA NA HA NA NA 100.0 1985 IlIi HA Hil Nli Hil 100.fi

OSWE60 19B6 NA NA NA NA HA 100.0 1985 NA NA HA NA HA 1U0.0

OTSE60 1986 NA NA NA NA NA 100.0 19E5 IlIi NA llli IIA IIA 100.0

-------------------------- .. ------------.. ------ .. _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, Conlinu.d on nut page. I

IAbLE m SENTENCES AS A PERCENT OF lOTAl CONVIClJDtlS bY SEH1ENC[ mE AND COUNTY fOR 1905 AND 198. - Continued

SENIENCES AS A PERCENI Of JOTAL CONVICTIONS I

---------------- .. _--------... -- ----_ .. -------------_ .. _---_ ............ - -------------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------_ .... _------------------- ---------------Local J.i 1 Tolal

coum Year Slale Fad 1 ily Local Jai I and Probation • Probation Olher Convictions -------------- ------_ ..... _---- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------

PUlltAn 1986 NA HA UR NA UA 100.0 1985 NA NA IIA UA NA 100.0

gums 198& 20.0 8.1 25.0 45.0 1.1 100.0 1985 36.1 5.6 2.8 41.2 S.l 100.0

mSSELAER 198& UA UA UA UA UA 100.0 1985 UA UA IIA UA UA 100.0

RICHHCUD 1986 50.0 .0 .0 50.0 .0 100.0 : 1985 50.0 .0 .0 50.0 .0 100.0

co I ROCKLAND 1986 UA IIA UA IIA UA 100.0 .....

....... 1965 NA UA .j:::,

UA UA UA 100.0

SI. LAWRENCE 1986 itA UA NA UA UA 100.0 1985 itA UA Nfl NA IIA luO.O

SARAIOGA 198& UA UA UA un NA 100.0 1985 UA itA NA NA UA WO.O

SCliEUEC1AOY 198& UA UA UA UA NA 100.0 • 1985 UA NA UA IIA NA luO.O

SCHOHARIE 198& NA HA HA UA NA 100.0 1985 UA NA UA UA NA 1~Ii.O

SCHUYLER 1986 UA UA HA NA Nn 100.0 1985 IIA UA NA UA NA 100.0

SENECA 1986 UA UA IIA UA UA 100.0 1985 NA IIA II~ UA H~ 100.0

SIEU&EU 1986 UA UA UA UA UA 100.0 1985 Nn IIA NA IIA UA 100.0

SUfFOLK 1986 25.0 12.5 .0 50.0 12.5 100.0 1985 18.B IU 37.5 IB.8 12.5 100.0

t Conlallu.d on next paq •• I

l~bl£ m SEHI~NCES AS A PERCEtIl Of lOTAl COIWICTIONS BY SENTEIICE mE AND COUNIY fOR 1985 AND HB6 - Conllnued

SENTENCES AS A PERCENI Of 10m CONVIClIONS I

-_ .. - .... ----------------------- .. _ .. _------ .. ------- .... _----------- ------------------------------- ... ---------------- .. --------------- -------------------------------- ---------------Local Jail Iotal

COUNIY Year Stll. fmlily Local Jal I and Probation Probal I on Other ConYI cll ons .. --- .. --------- -------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------

SULLIVAN 1986 UA IIA IIA NA UA 100.0

1985 Nil NA H~ Nil Nil 100.0

TIOGA 1986 NA NA NA HA NA 100.0

19&5 N. NA IIA H~ AA 10&.0

lOMPKINS 1986 UA HA IIA NA UA 100.0

1985 Nil NA Nil IIA UA 100.0

ULSTER 19B6 UA HA flA HA UA 100.0

19B5 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 1')0.0

OJ WARREN 19B6 NA UA IIA UA UA 100.0 I ...... 1905 ~A NA NA NA Nil 100.0 ...... U1

NASHINGTON 1986 IIA un HA UA HA 100.0 1985 N. NA NA HA Nil 1';0.0

WAYNE 1986 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.~

H6S NA NA NA HA NA 100.0

WESTCHESTER 1986 40.0 10,0 40.0 10.0 .0 10C.O 19B5 12.9 .0 20.6 14.3 14.1 I~O.O

WYOnlNG 19B6 NA IIA NA UA UA 100.0 19B5 N~ UA IIA NA UA luO.O

YAIES .19B6 IIA NA HA UA NA 100.0 19B5 H,l IIA lin HA Nil . luO.O

HEN YORK STATE 19B6 34.6 B.O 11.4 41.7 2.2 IOO.{) 1985 39.B 10.B 10.B 33.6 4.9 100.0

NEW YOhK CITY 19B6 lJ.D 7.B 14.2 44.0 2.2 100.0 19B5 lU 12.1 B.I 36.1 3.9 100.0

I lhese data reflect lh. oost senous sentence If, ,uJUple sentencedisposillons le.g., sentences including a Jail terM and a fine ha~e b~en counled as 'local jall'l. ThIS distribution 01 senlence types aiy be affecled by the underreporting of dlspo~\tions to the OIYISIOn of Cri.inal Justice Services Isee Append .. fl.

SOURCE: IriS DIVision 01 Cnslnal Justice SerYices, Arrests and ProceSSing Trends file.

APPENDIX C

PERCENT OF DISPOSITIONS REPORTED BY COUNTY 1984 -1986 .

ArFUlOl1 C PERW/I Of DISPOSED 1901 ARRESTS, 1995 ARRESIS, MID 1996 ARkESIS AND WE AVERAGE fEliCENI Of DISPOSED 1991 HIHOU6H 1~06 AaRESIS IA~ULlS ONLY! I

PERCENI OF DISPOSITIONS REfORlEO AVEhAG£ PERCENI ----------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ---------... ---- --------------- --------- .. ---- -------------- ----------- OF DI~PDSED

1901 Arresls 1965 Arresls 1966 Arrests 1984-86 ARRESIS ------'"'---- -------------- ---- .. ----- .. -.. --------- -----------_ .. - -- ... - .. ------ -------.. -_ ... -------------- ------.... -- ----------- ------- .. ------- -----------

coulm lotal felonv HI sde.eanor lohl felonr Hi sdeleinor lolal felony Hi sdeleancr lot.al felony "i~de.eanor -------------- ... ---------- ----------- ---... ---_ ... _- -----------

ALCA!I'I 68.2 6U 69.6 91.2 67.2 92.1 79.1 7l.6 91.4 B6.0 BI.l B7.9 AlLEGMI¥ 57.6 61.6 5605 SB.] 55.9 5B.9 52.4 H.l 55.] 56.0 52.9 56.9 &fiDlU B9.I 90.~ BB.3 87.0 a~.4 B5.B 74.8 75.] 14.1 91.5 64.4 82.5 ~ROOnE 62.1 BI.3 81.4 au 79.9 81.0 71.3 67.] 72.5 17.0 17.1 7B.1 CAlJARAU6US 67.B 60.5 69.1 70.0 65.4 71.1 61.1 53.7 42.0 66.1 59.5 61.5 CAYUGh 68.4 72.3 61.5 16.2 80.2 15.1 52.0 51.8 52.1 66.2 68.0 65.B CIIAUIAUaUA 78.5 7l.1 79.7 B2.] 17.B BU 7i1.9 60 •• 71.5 77.1 72.9 70.0 C!lEMurI6 BU BU 79.l BI.l 19.0 61.9 69.1 62.7 71.0 76.9 75 •• 77.4 CIlENoiHGO 65.1 58.9 66.6 70.7 14.2 71i.1 hl.2 ~8.6 6~.] 65.9 60.9 66.B CLlIIION 16.1 7b.b n.o 7;.1 72.6 74.7 59.5 53.2 61.7 69.9 65.9 71.0 COLUhDIA 74.6 75.a 74.2 74.9 n.? 75. ~ 69.8 67.5 70.5 73.2 72.3 7l.5 COR1l,lll0 82.6 85.1 82.5 60.5 7B.:i 80.0 62.2 5B.2 63.1 75.1 72.1 75.6 ~ELt\Wi,f,E 69.5 72.1 69.0 73.0 72.5 74.0 59.0 50.1 59.3 61.1 66.3 61.5

n OU1[IIESS 65.2 52.1 86.1 B6.2 54.0 e7.11 6i.5 bO.7 76.0 79.6 75.1 BI.2 I ~ ERIE 83.6 85.0 B3.I B4.9 B5.5 04.7 7~.5 73.2 69.5 19.5 BI.I 78.9

mEl 7l.~ 69.8 15.4 76.3 71.l 77.4 6l.l 55.2 66.1 70.8 6!.B 72.0 FRAlltUN 75.7 16.2 75.6 74.1 13.0 74.3 68.5 63.6 69.] 72.5 70.9 72.9 FULlOH 7B.O eJ.9 77 .0 79.7 70.0 8('.2 1I.B 67.0 n.4 17.0 76.9 18. ! GFIIES[E 6B.6 7S.3 67.1 69.1 50.2 n.] 62.B 49.3 66.1 66.B 59.B 6B.5 GRWlE 7S.9 11.6 77.7 77.7 15.6 7a.4 69.5 61.1 71.1 73.9 iO.1 75.3 IIHnluml 68.6 89.9 66.2 50.0 83.l 39.5 47.6 50.0 41.1 54.0 13.5 50.5 HWIt.E~ ~2.1 67.B 6G.l 67.l 60.7 67.0 52.1 4B.6 51.3 60.4 60.2 6il.S JEfFERSON 71.5 7&.9 69.5 72.1 15.0 11.1 67.0 64.6 68.1 70.2 11.7 W.6 WiGS 86.l 86.9 8S.4 82.l 03.6 ·6Q.1 66.3 68.6 61.1 77.4 79.0 75.2 lEIlIS 61.7 6B.O 59.9 65.3 61.1 60.6 47.5 51.5 41.4 50.9 68.0 55.9 LlVIIIGSIOII 76.9 n6 17.4 70.0 76.2 70.2 60.4 49.4 62.5 71.6 61.2 72.7 HHDISO:I 71.7 7 •• 2 n.2 72.4 67.9 73.4 64.5 59.4 AS.7 69.9 67.1 70.6 Hi!/:,O£ 69,3 eu 90.9 72,4 70.5 7l.1i 59.0 51.9 61.2 72.9 67.5 14.6 ~O!mOHERY 72.9 77.S 71.9 72.1 76.1 11.1 56.2 52.7 59.3 67.2 b7.B 67.1 Np.mu eS.1: 90.9 B7.7 80.1 Bb.5 77.b 5U 1I.b 53.1 74.7 79.0 72.9 N£U YUnl: 90.9 YD.9 9ll. Y 90.2 89.4 90.1. 79.4 71.5 Bu.S Ob.5 05.7 67.0 IlIf,.IiRA 90.1 89.1 90.6 96.b 6S.9 92.0 17.& 1:6.2 61.0 B5.B 79,9 81.6 [,uE IDA 75.1 74.7 75.2 H.I, 77.7 71.6 01.1 61.6 b4.9 71.0 71.1 71.0 O~Dm·hr.A BI.I 11.9 8U lB.2 71.0 81.9 51.9 ;6.8 58.0 71.2 6l.9 74./ ONIi,fiIO n7 11.0 72.4 70.4 71.1 69.0 65.6 69.7 6..0 69.1 73.1 60.1 OHr.t:GE ED.b 79.0 BI.I BI.S 70.0 B2.7 57.6 19.2 6').5 72.6 67.0 71.l fi~lEA:15 69.4 75.9 67.8 70.7 7B.l b7.2 55.6 54.6 56.3 65.l 69.2 6~. 9 Dsmo 79.6 77.3 811.D 76.B 70.5 lB.5 62.2 56.7 61.1 72.6 b9.1 73.7 omGO 7!.6 ·~3. 9 73.1 7U 7~.Q 79.1 bZ.9 ~(i.5 13.4 10.9 bU 71.7 fUW~H B2.1 bl.£ EU BI.I b6. J as. ; ~3.2 4\.~ bU H,6 So.! 7U

_~ .......... _ ~ ........ ___________ ... _____ .... ________ .. w _______________ .. _____________________ ... __ .. ______________________________ .. ____ .. _________ ... __ .. ___ ........ _________________________________________ .. ____ .. ___________ .. _______

, Cant in"td un netl page. I

APWiOll C P(~CENI Of DISPOS(D 198! ARHSlS, 1985 ARfiESlS, AND 1986 ARRESIS AND lIIE AVERAGE PEht(HI Of DISPOSED 1~81 1I1ROU6" 1906 Ar.kESTS IAfiUllS DlILYI I - Conllnued

PERCENT Of DISPOSITIONS REPORIED AVEf.,1GE PERCENT -- .... ---_ .... - -------------- ------ .... --_ .... _- -------------- ------_. ------ --_ ... _---------- -------------- -------------- ----------- Of DISPOSED

I~O. Arre.!s 1~05 Arrests 1986 Arrests 1~84-B6 AfiRESIS ----------- -------------- --.. -------- ----------- ---- ..... _------- ... --_ .. ------ --------- ...... -------------- ----------- .... _--------- --------------- -----------

cOOim Total FElony Hi ~deDeanor lata I Felony "I sdeae.nor Total Felony Hi sdeaeanor lotd felony IIi sdegeanor -_ .. -._-------- ---------- .. -- ... -------- ----------- -----------

UUWI5 ;0.0 92.2 89.5 9~.1 ~O.O 00.1 n.8 n.8 73.8 84.0 al.2 83.7 F.EIIS5£LAfR 79.3 7l.4 79.1 17.9 76.1 79.3 £6.6 bO.1 £B.4 14.0 £9.9 75.1 RICllnOND 92.1 92.8 91.7 90.5 n.4 89.l 76.3 78.9 74,6 86.1 87.8 05.0 ~UcnMIO 7U ?b.0 7403 75.B 79.0 74.7 5b.0 53.5 57.1 69.1 69. I 69.1 SI. LAWRfNCE 52.1 29.0 ~6.9 54.3 3..0 58.1 51.2 32.3 5'-6 52.5 11.9 56.5 5Af;,HOGol 78.1 76.7 7B.3 84.6 BO.5 85.5 7£.3 66.8 70.4 79.7 74.4 a~.o

SCHENECTADY 9B.7 05.1 99.7 91.B 89.4 92.5 .71.2 6£.9 BO.1 95.£ BO.O a7.1 SClial/"kl~ 5b. ~ 70.5 54.3 10.9 16.3 69.1 62.0 66.0 61.1 £1.2 70.7 £1.8 SCHUlLER 7u.9 70.8 71.0 1~.1 74.0 7U 66. J 64.7 68.1 11.2 70.6 71. 3 SENECA 71.6 62.0 73.4 61.2 66.7 £2.3 52.6 53.6 52.1 62.3 60.6 62.1 SlEI!&ElI 71.9 SO.8 69.9 73.4 71.6 73.9 63.3 59.6 £4.6 69.1 69.4 69.1

n SUfffiLK 86.5 66.0 86.0 81.1 8l.9 82.8 51.9 £&.6 51.1 74.5 71.5 73.5 I

SULLIVAN 65.0 61.1 85.6 81.1 17.0 02.6 65.8 61.1 77.6 73.4 N 67.B 79.1 TlUGh 78.0 1£.0 78.3 75.9 81.1 71.6 58.0 57.3 58.1 70.0 69.7 70.0 lOH?t:IIIS 81.1 17.8 8:1.0 78.1 £9.D 19.9 60.1 B.2 AU 73.1 62.2 75.4 ULSTER 6~. 9 £5.9 71.2 70.0 6t.9 72.6 65.~ 5U 67.7 6B.4 A2.2 10.4 ~ARF.EN 87.5 89,5 87.1 89.7 8B.O 90.0 eO.2 60.1 BO.2 85.7 85.6 as.7 W .. SHINGIDII 61.0 61.9 £1.3 £2.9 63.3 62.a 56.9 £1.8 55.4 £0.9 £2.3 60.5 UillNE 62.3 bO.9 62.6 68.5 £5.3 69.1 67.6 58.6 69.3 66.2 61.6 £7.0 ~EmilESTEij 67.7 , 69.0 .7.2 74.4 77.5 73.1 65.5 70.a 63.1 £9.2 72.5 67.9 ~iOlHHG .~.O 65.1 3 •• 2 n.4 63.6 lB •• 33.0 42.9 30.6 39.5 57.5 35. i YnTES 70.5 au b7.8 bO.7 92.1 55.1 57.4 58.5 57.0 62.2 71.3 5~.5 NEW iORI: STATE 35.J Bb.9 9 •• ~ BU 85.1 Bl.1 £~. b 70.3 69.2 19.2 60.3 78.£ /lEW YO[iK CITY E9.5 99.7 09.4 B7.B B7.B 87.B 74,6 13.8 75.2 63.5 61.3 83.7

~.-------- .. --- .. ---- .. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. ---------.. --------------------------------------------------------------I Ihls lable prov',de, dn Indlcallon 01 the proportion 01 arrest., eKcluding those lor Juventle Ol/enders, lor ~hich linal disposltaons HerE reported to the Division 01 Criainal Justice ServICes' WIIO&TS

data srst •• as 01 July I~07. ·lnteri.' dispositions, such as the Issuance 01 i Marrant, ~re counted as lis5ing.

sGum: tlYS D,v,s,on 01 Cnolndl Ju,tace Senlce;, Counly Profiles Syste,.

APPENDIX D

NEW YORK STATE . CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES MAPS

NEW YORK STATE

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

o I

0-

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ~AN~IN A \ A'l0~A / . 'LYON MY • ~

CltAUIAUOlJA I CATTAnAut;us I ALLEGANY

• MAXIMUM

.. MEDIUM

.. MINIMUM

1 ClOSt(J MAHCH lOUt)

A. OGDENSBURG ~A. -. CLiNTON/CLINTON ANNEX

\ fRANKliN

CLINTON Sf LAWflENce CAMP.

GABRielS

.A. ADIRONDACK

~ WASHINGTON iii GREAT MEADOW

I

COLUMBIA

UUTCltfSf

EASTERN/EASTERN ANNEX • J. GREEN UAVEN/GREEN HAVEtJ ANNEX

~I F1SIiKlll!CAMP BEACON/DOWNSTATE

OTIS~"ANGE llE -- ...

MID ORANGE __ A '1 • • Sll.lIlSllH

BEDFORD

.4 B SING.SINGIT~IIlCKlANI. ~ TACONIC IlIllS

• AVVIEW o. PPAN~ 04 • .E lDClECOMR .~-. OIlON~: FULTON ft:Y~

INCOlN . • ~ ~~ .- .. • PAflKSIDE -_ - .'tW YIlIIK: f" N~SS' SlJfFOIK _ __ ~C;;;l; . NASSAll

ARTHUR Kllf{p'! .LE~~E \ VO~ ISLAND I

""'111'''11111 (jo' ". -.:.. J-NSBOnO

o I

'"

New York State

DIVISION FOR YOUTH

t~\~'~, RESIDENTIAL ~ .. ,-£"J.~ PROGRAMS

• ..."....-&~ ..... a..",.J -~r_~~ , I , ' .

\ \ a-... '1

\ ....... ,.. AflRONOAC

i \ r'

\ L--· ...... · . r·--P .......... &t<CI

I

". i \ ,..... I. . " /.-' I.' ._.--.... j l---·~·-·-· \

,.! • \ .l . \ ( ./ . \ r ,._ .. , .... .-·r

~ ... "". \ i p .... - J ;-.-.~ I \ • ' .~ \ I ! .... 1 .. ~ ....... .-

"WI

J ."" \ .........- ~u { ......... ..,.. .. ...... ,/ I.J 1- t ill . 1'- . I '\'I'-'HOME 2, J;

f 1I0 ... ES j -~. _ J, 0.-". ANNSVILLE .I '-.. \."....-\ I . I ' ... .-v--<-~~ : ~ I........J,., lJ· l: ......... I .,........ I . I: L. r~ i ""'....~ ! ..... _.t.or - . \ • ~._. ___ • /lOME 4! "". II 1·-.... '· .... l'.L.- iHt.""'R):IIOME 2Q TRYON I t

_.~""'" I I .... J I . '. .. • NUEVAVISrA I ~ ..: I . a.OftAOl • ( VOC 5 '"l '\,. . f· ... AAIOOA" '. .........' r~'-'"l..- _. • . '. \JIOME 1.1 11 _ 'ULIOH \ L' B IIO~~8 Y04.6 1"':-1.· I /'U L,l ...,..,.6A \ L 1 .. ---'-1- ~~ .. OUST/W,- ""' .. '" .w.c. '. I I .... I

URBA CENTEII-.-.-.-.JoAT~A • J '\-.' I t _"" .r. I"J ..,....~, uo'ME'l:. '"OMEilZI _I • n r l.. .........,.. - . -" . • • y .. :.~ \

U:Vfl I - Slcunf CHoU EItS

QllooKWOOO CIIOOIK~E

GOSUlN tlARU ... VALLEY TRVON GIRLS'

LI..cCOIlUACK UASffN'ARK OAfKA. SIEVENS T/lYO .. BOYS'

leVELS II Go III LIMITED SECUIlE CENTERS

aRACE BUSIIWICK HlGIlLA .. O INDUSfRV

'ARKER PVRA ... ,D SOUIIi LA"SING TRYON

LEVEL IV RURAL RESIDUITIAL GEtHERS

ADIRO .. DACK ANNSVILLE AUllUAN BRENTWOOD CASS GREAT VALLEV

UIDOLUOWN NueVA VISTA SOJOunr'ER T8um SOulU KOR 1I11GIH WILLOWBROOK

LEVEL V YDlnll OEVElOPME .. T CUHERS

VOC' URON)( VDC 1 BROOKLYN YOC 48AOOKLYN

YDC b SYRACUSE YDC 8 BUffALO

LEVEL VI MASTEI'l I' 1 t: AUBURN -l ,-.; "}---... -/.ic..-:1AQ!!oo"l PARK ""'~ I I r'-'-'~ ,- ---,.-.-' I-'-'-'~" outGO" - <:. f'-'- ..... ...-I . LIVINGSTON H i 'AfU" ,\ :".06& CORflAhO 7 HOME 14

_ .; tRIl ! DEAl ON ;1 J._. i ';, .. _._.1 RJ::GION II J .' AU.... J CONTRACrtlOMES-NIAGARAfAllS ." . \ /.-L.'A ~ 1 /-. _ .• '" I r / to \ _ URBA .. CENTER - auffALO

'.J' I \, ..... ~. I L.-j "'_. 1 •• SOUTIII;ANSING i . .-' • ",..c.o'" ,CASS .-.-' • , . I 'l._ \."\ {,.:~"t, 1,..- -' • ;.

CO ...... U .. ITY,BASED fACILITIES

.~ .. "'....,...! GREATVAlLE~ I i 1!o-w." :::. .... ,,_.-\ CHINANGoi ._sO, KORTRIGtIT)--' "O" •• k. ,ROOKW0p,0

! CAn ... .,..,. ,'......... m",.. :....~,IIl.!'l·~~OIWIC~. l j .... .r I" REG7'N III:· UROAN 1I0MES;

III BROOKLYN III SYRACUSE tI. AOCIIESTER "6~.aRONX 111 NASSAU tlUUUffALO

19 UTICA JOfU110N ~ IIOME29 I . , ,,~"!" I --1 /I, /.

/' ' I - I j- I .-' ..... ~ .. , '... r . .J, , • • \ I I . a-._. 3 004' , HOMEIS ~ ...... - • ...: , cro_."

...,.y ..... __ '_4.QO'~-"'_~ , IIOME 2J. I ."00.... I BRACE~' PAR!(!Enl':

2HflO,(

'~...' - I - .; -...- ..................... ,_'. ._ •• ~. ___ ~ .£". HOMEJO mil 'I' . ,,, ...... tlARLE~l·

21SCIIE .. ECTAO'( 24 elMIRA 25DlJfCIIESS 2HIDIIlICfLLO

"Preventing

Delinquency

Tllrougll Positive

Yout" Development"

New

York

City

_(~ '" ': IIIGIlLAN VAlLf\I' )' I s, fRUII} ,. .~ c.: UUUR OUlC •• " ~ {~ IIOME 26 "!="OOIKEE IIOME 17:r

\\ llAUV"'" ~ ........ \.-~. I HOMf 25 F \.. / " ..... ~l,...1

1t9 srA IE .. ISLAND 10 WESrCIIESJER II SUFfOLK 14 ALBANY '6 DINGIIAMION n PDUGUKHPSIE

2111AIILEM 2UGLENSfAllS 29 CIiAuT AUQUA 30ulsreA

.~. r'-MldOLETOWN ,,.-' J'--'-:~ I'. "' .... w I

\..- ""N" \1: .-'.. 1 • "~. GOSIIEN ~~-;;~~E lal ./~

.. ~."., ~ .p ..

. ~\' ~ .... Marlo M.Cuomo '-l~:LAN°1 :'\ • r.. 'Il-O" '~.1 NISI'. • .....,. ~

Governor .. tCUESUtI. \. • ...-. p .... tul~" 00 /.. ..... ...'

~' ~ 1 BflENTWOO ~

leonard G. Dun5ton I~ ~o;;{":i , .. ,,'" -?/ DI • Q \ 1I0~1~ .... J.I'~""""·-

rector I ..... 1I0ME.l..,....r:-... !·,....-i) ~rii~~ • '.".cI-~

""..... REGION IV HE IStu M"'( III I

APPENDIX E

VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSES

VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSES1

PL SECTION SUB- FELONY OFFENSES NUMBER DIVISION CLASS

Assault 2nd 120.05 all 0 Assau 1t 1st2 120.10 all C Aggravated Assault on

Peace Officer2 120.11 00 B Manslaughter 1st2 125.20 all B Murder 2~d, Attemoted 125.25 B Rape 1st 130.35 all B Sodomy 1 st2 . 130.50 all B Sexual Abuse 1st 130.65 all D Agg. Sexual Ab~se2 130.70 all 8 Kidnapping 2nd 135.20 00 B Kidnapping 12t, Attempted 135.25 all B Burglary 2nd 140.25 all C Burglary ~st2 140.30 all B Arson 2nd 150.15 all B Arson 1st, Attemoted 150.20 all B Robbery 2nd2 160.10 all C Robbery 1st2 160.15 all B Intimidation 2nd4 215:16 all D Intimidation 1st2,4 215.17 all B Crim. Poss. Weapon 3rd2 265.02 04,05 D Crim. Poss. Weapon 2nd2 265.03 00 C Crim. Pass. Weapon ls~2 265.04 all B Crim. Use Firearm 2nd 265.08 all C Crim. Use Firearm 1st2 265.09 all B Crim. Sale Firearm 1st 265.12 00 D

The following crimes are not designated as "violent felony offenses" but are included as such for statistical purposes:

Murder 2nd 125.25 all A-1 Murder 1st, Including

Attempted 125.27 all A-1 Kidnapping 1st 135.25 all A-1 Arson 1st 150.20 all A-I Crim. Poss. Weapon 3rd3 265.02 00,01,02,03 D

1penal Law of the State of New York, Section 70.02.

2An "attempt" to commit this crime is also classified as a "violent felony offense"; an attempt is one felony class lower than the actual commission of the crime.

3These offenses are counfed as "violent felony offenses" only in the data provided by the NYS Department of Correctional Services.

4Effective 11/1/86. E-1

APPENDIX F

NEW YORK STATE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

Board of Prisoners. The Board of Prisoners' account is the only source of local assistance funding administered by DOCS. Funds paid out of the account cover four areas:

o Coram Nobis: Inmates may have to be returned to their county of commitment for court proceedings. When they are, they are housed in the county jail. Counties are reimbursed $20 per diem for housing these inmates.

o Felons: Persons convicted of "0" and "E" felonies who receive a maximum sentence of less than one year cannot be incarcerated in State facilities. Instead, these sentences are served in county jails. This program reimburses the county at the rate of 520 per diem.

o Parole Violators: Counties are reimbursed $20 per diem for housing parole vioJators until they can be transferred into the State system.

o State Readies: These are convicted felons for whom the committing county has the D~partment that they are awaiting transfer into the State system. Beginning on 7/1/85, countles were reimbursed 520 per diem toward the cost of housing those who have been state ready for five days. After the inmate has been state ready five days, reimbursement is retroactive to the ftrst day. Conversely, if an individual is state ready for only one to four days, there is no reimbursement.

Community Treatment Programs. The Department of Correctional Services has in the past, and will again this year, be allowed to enter into agreements to place low-risk inmates, within a year of parole eligibility, into community contract facilities. These 24-hour a day facilities offer drug rehabilitation programs to those inmates who, it is believed, have more of a drug problem than a criminal history. Innovative project components include the use of naltrexone on a pilot basis, intensive vocational rehabilitation services, and on-site supervision by parole officers.

Under the community contract program, the Division of Substance Abuse Services identifies which community beds can be used and arrives at a contract with the local facilities. The program operated with approximately 300 contract beds in 1983 and again in 1984, but was not continu0d in the 1985-86 fiscal plan. A total of 300 slots for DOCS inmates is propos~d for FY 1986-87, at a per in~~te per annum cost of 511,000, versus the 526,000 a year cost of incarceration in correctional facilities. Given the actual cost of incarceration within the DOCS system, the choice is to imprison one inmate or to treat three in the community. Funding of the program could result in a net savings to taxpayers of 57 million annually, according to memoranda in support of the legislation.

Prison Transfer to State Facilities. The State reimburses counties for their costs incurred in transporting state-ready inmates to State correctional facilities.

F-l

CRIME VICTIMS BOARD

~r;me Victims Compensation Awards. The Crime Victims Compensation Program provides financial assistance to innocent victims of violent crimes. Claims may be filed by the victim of a crime who has incurred personal injuries or by a surviving spouse, parent, child, or other dependent if the victim died as a direct result of the crime. Payments are made for unreimbursed medical and rehabi 1 i tat i ve expenses as we 11 as loss of earn i ngs or support. Funeral benefits may be paid to any person who has paid the burial expenses. The program is also permitted to reimburse claimants for transportation costs incurred for necessary court appearances in connection with the prosecution of a crime and for loss or damage to essential personal property. Victims 60 years or older' and disabled victims need not be injured to qualify for these last two benefits. Beginning with cederal Fiscal Year 10/1/85 - 9/30/86 the State will receive federal compensation funds on a 35% reimbursement rate; these funds are included in the FY 1985-86 appropriation.

Victim and Witness Assistance Program. In FY 1981-82, the Crime Victims Board initiated the Victim and Witness Assistance Program with $1:5 million in funding for 22 programs. The number of.funded programs has since doubled. Each of the local programs which.receives funding provides services in one of five general areas for victims and witnesses:

o victims of domestic violence, o elderly crime victims, o victims of sexual assaults, o all types of victims, and, o court related services.

These programs provide a comprehensive array of assistance services to address the economic, fiscal, psychological, and criminal justice consequences of victimization.. Services include: information, referral to other agencies, supportive counseling, psychological counseling, group counseling, application assistance, court notification, court accompanied impact statements, hotline, lock installation, home visits, escort service, anG transportation.

The agency has expanded existing programs and initiated new programs with federal funds from the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) of 1984.

F-2

---~-~------~---,-----

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES

Asset/Forfeiture Legislation. The passage of Article 13-A (CPLR) provided prosecutors in New York State with a new tool to combat crime. This statute allows for the seizure of the proceeds and instrumentalities of crime, thereby. reducing the profitability of, and incentive for, illegal activity.

Pursuant to Chapter 669 of the Laws of 1984, SI million in State funds were made available to counties participating in the Target Crime Init~ative Program (see description' below) and the New York City Special Narcotics Prosecutor for the purpose of establishing forfeiture units in local prosecutors' offices. Funds were not appropriated in FY 86-87 for the forfeiture effort because the value of assets seized could be utilized to support the initiative.

Crime Prevention and Protection. This program provides funds for special contractual services, for expenses of programs to prevent crime and protect senior citizens. These appropriations commenced with one award in 1977 and increased to 90 awards in 1985. There was no appropriation for FY 1982-83. Although initially placed in the state purposes portion of the budget, this appropriation now appears 1n local assistance.

The· responsibility for implementation rests with the.Commissioner of tbe Division of Criminal Justice Services, and is administered by the Office of Funding and Program Assistance.

Emergency Felony Case Processing Program. A rapid increasing court backlog led to the passage of the Emergency Felony Case Processing Program (Chapters 496 and 497 of the Laws of 1971. When first enacted, IS additional court parts were established with State support to expedite the processing of the backlogged felony cases. As a result of court reorganization and consolidation efforts, the historically designated parts have been integrated into the total court system. The N.Y.C. Legal Aid Society and Department of Probation also participate in the program by providing defense services and completing presentence investigations. The State shares with the City of New York the incremental expense of maintaining an enhanced level of criminal court parts, with State aid totaling up to 58% of the cost. Payment of aid is contingent on a matching appropriation from the City of New York for the remaining 42% of expenses.

Indigent Parolee Program. The State provides aid to counties for the legal representation of indigent parolees by private, appointed attorneys and public defense programs r pursuant to Section 250(i) of the Executive Law and Article 18-8 of the County Law. The program has existed since 1973 and helps meet the needs of indigent parole violators for competent legal help. 8y encouraging

F-3

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES (continued)

defense attorneys to provide this assistance quickly and often, this State aid effort also contributes to a more efficient parole revocation process, the elimination of delays, and a reduction in unnecessary incarceration of alleged violators.

Legal services for individuals involved in parole revocations are provided according to a plan that is executed by either the county executive or the board of supervisors of each county or by the governing city in which a county is wholly contained. The plan describes whether the legal assistance purchased will involve the services of a public defender, a private legal aid bureau or sdciety, or an administrator of a bar association appointed-counsel plan. The Division of Criminal Justice Services is responsible for the administration of these funds through a system of reimbursement to the counties.

Justice Assistance Act - F~deral Funds. The Division of Criminal Justice Services, through the Juvenile Justice and Federal Programming Unit, administers federal block grant funds received under the Justice Assistance Act. The Justice Assistance Act's block grant program will award New York State $3,396,000 to support programs in any of 18 federally designated program areas. The Governor's Office, in consultation with members of the legislature, has directed that these f.!.lnds will support programs in the following areas, subject to necessary federal approvals:

o Prosecution of White Collar and Organization Crime o Violent Predator o Pre-Trial Services o Enhancement of Child Abuse Prosecution o Information Systems o Narcotics Enforcement o Integrated Criminal Apprehension Program

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention - Federal Funds. The Division of Criminal Justice Services, through the Juvenile Justice and Federal Programming Unit, administers federal block grant funds received under the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. These funds are utilized by New York State to assist units of local government and State agencies in improving the operations of the juvenile justice system, in efforts to control crime, and to assure the quality of justice in the State. The funds primarily provide seed money to support changes and improvements in the juvenile justice system. Funds are used to support programs in six areas:

o Delinquency Prevention/Diversion o Services for Detained and Incarcerated Youth o Dispositional Alternatives o Court Processing o Monitoring Compliance o Systems Planning and Interagency Coordination

F-4


.. ~

Law Guardian Back-Up Center. Statewide Youth Advocacy of Rochester has received a legislative appropriation to establish the Law Guardian Back-Up Center. This Center will provide technical assistance and training to law guardians practicing before family courts primarily outside of New York City. Training and legal research will cover JD, PINS, and abuse/neglect proceedings. Social work and legal assistance will also be provided. A brief bank and library will be developed, as will an inventoty of dispositional alternatives and community-based programs. Updates will be provided on legal and legislative developments. Videotaped training to be used in rural counties will be developed. Staff will include two lawyers and one social worker.

Major Offense Police Program (MOPP). This program provides State funds to nine of the largest police agencies in the State to target violent offenders, career criminals, and narcotics traffickers. The cities of New York, Rochester, Syracuse, and Nassau and Suffolk counties have identified career criminals wno r~ceive special case processing by the Detective Bureau when arrested for felony offenses. The City of Buffalo established separate task forces dealing with robbery, burglary, and sex crimes to identify and apprehend career offenders. Rockland and Orange counties created county-wide task forces comprised of local police officers and county district attorney investigators to target major narcotics traffickers. In Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk counties M.O.P.P. funds supplement eXisting narcotics investigations through the addition of personnel and "buying-money." In 1984, M.O.P.P. funds supported 199 sworn police personnel, one assistant district attorney, and nine support staff who conducted intensive investigations against "career criminals" who were violent or repeat felons. M.O.P.P. personnel in the nine localities handled a total of 9,852 cases against the most serious offenders in 1984, up 12% from the 1983 M.O.P.P. total of 8,820 cases.

Mobile Radio District Program. This program seeks to standardize law enforcement radio configurations and enhance communication hardware in municipal law enforcement agencies. Effective April 1, 1983 the Mobile Radio District program was re-enacted by the legislature. The legislature did not appropriate any monies for this program in 1982.

The program that has been in effect for the past thirteen years was a combination of federal and locally funded projects. Since 1982 the program has been State funded.

The responsibility for implementation now rests with the Commissioner of the Division of Criminal Justice Services and is administered by the Bureau for Municipal Police, Mobile RaDio District Unit.

F-5


Narcotics Control. The federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 established a program of grants to State and local agencies for drug law enforcement. Under this Act, the State and localities are eligible for funds under the Narcotics Control Assistance Formula Grant Program. New York State is eligible for $111,539,00 in federal fiscal year 1987. It is anticipated that the federal award for FY 1988 and FY 1989 will be for the same amount.

The New York State Legislature has identified the following priority areas: apprehension, prosecution and adjudication of persons who violate State and local controlled substances laws, as defined in the penal and public health laws; additional correctional resources for such persons; programs to eliminate the growth and production of controlled substances, programs for drug-dependent offenders; and demonstration. programs to identify major offenders and move these offenders expeditiously through ~he judicial system.

The distribution of funds will be in the ratio of 39.61 between state agency programs and local government programs. These federal funds must be matched on a cash basis with one dollar in non-federal funds for every three dollars in federal funds.

Nassau County Service to Rape Victims' Task Force. Advocacy services for victims of sexual assault include the following: hospital advocacy (support, information, referral, follow-up); criminal justice system advocacy; recruitment, supervision, and training of volunteers; newsletters; field placement for students; public information through public speaking and distribution of literature.

Neighborhood Preservation Crime Prevention Act· Established in the Laws of 1983, Chapter 55, by Governor Cuomo and the Legislature, the Neighborhood Preservation Crime Prevention Act made funds available to local not-for-profit organizations (excluding municipalities, except for auxiliary police programs). The funds are awarded on a competitive basis for organizations to operate crime prevention programs.

The responsibility for the implementation of this program rests with the Commissioner of the Division of Criminal Justice Services. It is administered by the Office of Crime Prevention of the Bureau for Municipal Police. The funds supporting NPCPA are in the state purposes portion of the annual budget, but the statute creating this program indicates that the awards are to be made to community-based organizations.

New York City School Security Officer Program. This program extends an existing ongoing. effort in New York City junior and senior high school buildings to include elementary school buildings in Community School District 20 in Brooklyn. The $415,000 will provide salaries and support for such elementary school security officers.

F-6


---- - - -- ---

N.Y.S. Defenders' Association. The State has funded the N.Y.S. Defenders' Association since 1981 in order to provide broad-based defender support services on a statewide level. Over the past four years, the Association has provided legal research and consultation on over 4,000 requests by publ'ic defense attorneys. Such assistance encompasses legar memoranda, analyses of briefs, consultation, videotaped court simulation, workshops, and training seminars.

The Association is involved in amicus curiae work. It provides a referral service to help defenders obtain expert witnesses, investigators and attorneys with particular expertise, and it collects and disseminates briefs and other material to provide defense attorneys with legal research capabilities. It also provides technical assistance to both State and local governments, provides evaluative seminars and engages in research and data retrieval covering various aspects of the criminal justice system.

Offender Aid and Restoration of Western New York, Inc .. (OAR/WNY). (OAR/WRY) delivers a wide variety of services to ex-offenders and their families. OAR/WRY conducts workshops th'at train ex-offenders in setting employment goals and completing applications. Ex-offenders learn about employer expectations and techniques for successful job interviews and job retention. The family services program delivers support and counseling to families before, during, and after the offender's incarceration and helps the family in making requests for assistance through social service agencies. The program seeks to-address the needs of the ex-offenders in order to facilitate their successful reentry into society.

Prisoners' Leaal Services. Prisoners' Legal Services of New York (PLS) provides legal assistance to inmates of New York's 38 State correctional facilities who have no other legal representation, are financially unable to retain counsel and cannot obtain legal assistance from any other legal services organization. PLS began in 1976 with federal grant funds, and since 1978 has been supported by the State. .

With a central office in New York City, Prisoners' Legal Services maintains six field offices, located in Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, Plattsburgh, Poughkeepsie, and New York. The types of cases handled by Prisoners' Legal Services are grouped into three general categories: 1) post-conviction matters, such as sentence computation and determination of parole eligibility; 2) institutional problems, such as disciplinary procedures and living conditions; and 3) a wide range of civil and domestic law problems, such as matrimonial actions and custody proceedings. These legal services have succeeded in providing for reasonable and satisfactory resolution of inmate problems and grievances. As a result of this kind of assistance to indigent inmates, Prisoners' Legal Services also serves the State's court system, to the extent that it screens complaints from its inmate clients and diverts from the courts potential litigation which is deemed to be without merit.

F-7


Soft Body Armor Reimbursement Program. Effective April 1, 1984 a bill became law which amended the Executive Law in relation to providing for State reimbursement to municipalities, public authorities, and public benefit corporations for expenses incurred in the purchase of soft body ballistic armor vests for police officers. The Soft Body Armor Vest Reimbursement Program was initiated in the Department of Labor in 1981.

Section 837-d of the Executive Law effectively repealed Article 17-A of the Labor Law and empowers the Commissioner of the Division of Criminal Justice Services to certify vouchers for the State Comptroller for reimbursement payments.

The responsibility for implementation and regulation now rests with the Commissioner of the Division of Criminal Justice Services. Due to the specific law enforcement nature of the project, the practical operational functioning of the prog~am was assigned in April of 1984 to the Bureau of Municipal Police, Police Training and Administrative Services Section.

No information relative to expenditures is available prior to the Division of Criminal Justice Services' involvement in the project.

Special Narcotics Court Program. The Special Narcotics Court Program' (SNP) was initiated by Chapter 462 of the Laws of 1971 as a legislative response to the need for an efficient, specialized, and coordinated narcotics ~rosecution effort in the City of New York.

Pursuant to this legislation, a Special Narcotics Prosecutor was appointed by the five District Attorneys in New York City. He is centrally located, with offices in lower Manhattan, and is responsible for the citywide prosecution of narcotics cases, as well as convening a special citywide Grand Jury.

In addition to providing for the office of the Special Prosecutor, the legislation provides for the r.rp.ation of twelve new criminal court parts, primarily concerned with the handling of narcotics cases. Extensive' reorganization of the court system by the Office of Court Administration has resulted in the integration of the twelve narcotics parts with other criminal parts in the New York City Supreme Court.

The State continues to fund up to 61 percent of the costs of the office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor and an enhanced level of criminal parts, as well as the supportive services rendered by the City Departments of Probation and Corrections and the Legal Aid Society. The City contributes the remaining 39 percent.

SQecial Ylarrant Enforcement Enhancement Proqram. Governor Cuomo and the Legislature established the Special Warrant Enforcement Enhancement Program

F-8


(S.W.E.E.P.) in September 1984 in response to a growing backlog of outstanding criminal warrants. S.W.E.E.P. provided $2.5 million in State funds to assist 21 law enforcement agencies in apprehending their most serious felony warrant suspects. The goal of the program is to provide funding assistance for additional enforcement personnel for short term, intensive warrant enforcement in the localities with the most severe felony warrant backlogs. These personnel are assigned on a temporary basis to enhance existing warrant enforcement efforts. A total of 5,947 warrants were cleared under S.W.E.E.P. including 1,818 violept felony and 2,590 felony warrants.

Suffolk County Criminal Justice ~oordinating Council Re-Route Transitional Program for Ex-Offenders. Transitional services program designed to expedite the reintegration of ex-offenders into the community upon their release from Suffolk County Correctional facilities. A multi-service, multi-disciplinary, inter-agency approach including therapy, family counseling, supplementary education, job tr~ining, job placement, legal aid, needs-based payments, and linkages to services for areas outside the program's scope.

Target Crime Initiative Program. The Target Crime Initiative Program (TCI) was created April 1, 1983 as the result of a recommendation by the Governor to the Legislature. Three prosecution programs, the State Felony Program, Major Violent Offense Program, and the Major Offense Prosecution Program, were merged into one comprehensive anti-crime package to eliminate overlapping and duplicated program services. The primary goal of TCI is to combat violent felony crime and target on the swift adjudication of habitual and violent offenders. Specific progra~ objectives include reducing the caseloads of TCI attorneys, increasing the number of indictments against repeat offenders, eliminating plea bargaining except under extraordinary circumstances, increasing the rate and level of convictions, and increasing the number and length of prison sentences. for TCT defendants. The number of counties participating in Tel has been (A06nded from 18 to 27, and now includes those counties reporting 97% of the v:vient felonies in the State.

Transit Crime Interdiction Program. In April 1985, the Transit Crime Interdiction Program was established. This program supports a Decoy Unit of 24 officers and 3 supervisors. Members of the Decoy Unit analyze crime patterns on the subway system and then pose as persons likely to be victimized in order to catch offenders in the act of committing serious crimes. Through the end of October 1985, the Decoy Unit made a total of 460 felony arrests of which 443 were made on the subway, 2 on buses, and 15 off the transit system. Of the 405 adult offenders arrested, 292 had prior arrest records, including 224 which had prior felony arrests.

Transit Strike Force. In response to growing public outcry over subway crime. Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature provided 3.5 million dollars for the establishment of the Transit Police Strike Force on April 1, 1983. The Strike Force generates a target list of violent or repeat offenders operating on the

F-9


subway system. The crimes include homicide, kidnapping, forcible rape/sodomy, and robberies which are targeted along with suspects who have been arrested for five or more larcenies from the person such as pickpocketing or jostling. These targets receive special handling when arrested to ensure their removal from the subway system. During 1984, the Strike Force arrested 1,866 persons as target offenders or for committing target crimes. Of these, 908 were augmented by the Strike Force's Major Casd or Robbery Squads resulting in 907 felony arraignments. An additional 41 non-target cases were augmented, . bringing the total number of offenders augmented to 949. The Apprehension Unit of the Strike Force targets pickpockets, jostlers, and bagopeners, and arrested 416 persons for such offenses in 1984.

Community Patrol Officer Program. DCJS will administer a grant to the Vera Institute to conduct a two-year evaluation of the Community Patrol Office (CPO) program.

The CPO program is an innovative effort to foster improved police-community re1ation$ and enhance the ability of the police to address crime and order maintenance problems in target areas. The program is staffed by 250 volunteer police officers and sergeants, who are assigned to designated beats consisting of approximately twenty square blocks.

Vera Institute staff served as consultants to the New York City Police Department during the p1anning of the CPO concept, and closely monitored pilot testing of the project. Fifty beats will be randomly selected for an evaluation sample, and a variety of techniques will be employed in the comprehensive analysis covering every aspect of the program.

Westchester Datafacs. The Westchester Datafacs System is a regional network of nine photofacsimile transmitters placed strategically throughout the country to service the Criminal History Record Information requests of forty local police departments. The Criminal History Record Information, or "rap-sheet," is transmitted from the Criminal History Repository located at the Division of Criminal Justice Services in Albany to the requesting local police department. In turn, the information is then forwarded to the District Attorney and Court enabling the presiding judge to make a better informed bail/bond or release decision.

Information expedites the criminal justice process and serves to reduce the number of defendants detained in the County Jail facility. In this sense, the Datafacs System is truly an alternative to incarceration.

F-IO

DIVISION OF PAROLE

Parole Resource Center. The Parole Resource Center (PRC) provides the Division of Parole with the capability to contract with community-based service providers for housing and programming of selected individuals released to community supervision. This structured environment has provided the Board of Parole with an alternative to continued incarceration of individuals in need of supportive services in the community. The PRC provides a reasonable level of assurance that individuals in need of a structured setting upon release are provided with an opportunity to participate in community-based programs which will lead to their long-term success in life styles.

Parole Transitional Facilities. The Parole Transitional Facility Program (PTF) functions in much the same manner as does the Parole Resource Center (PRC). The basic difference is in the· point of entry into the Program. The PTF provides the Parole Board with an alternative option for dealing with rule violators whose reimprisonment would serve little or no purpose. The use of a crisis intervention treatment approach provides short-term services in a semistructured residential setting in the community rather than in the detached . surroundings of a ·correctional facility.

Employment Services Project. Employment is a key element in the successful adjustment to community life upon release from a correctional facility. Funding has been provided to enhance the Division's efforts in employment training and placement services. Contracting with the Vera Institute of Justice for services under its Vocational Development Program, the Division of Parole can provide developmental employment services and increase its private sector job placement services. In addition, Vera will assist the Division of Parole in the training of its employment services staff to maximize the employability and placement capability and in long range strategic planning to improve services performance.

F-ll

DIVISION OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES

"Classifications/Alternatives" Bill. The "Classifications/Alternatives" bill (Chapters 907 & 908, Laws of 1984) was enacted on August 6, 1984 to help reduce overcrowding pressures in the county jails, to facilitate more efficient and practical jail population management, and to support the development and implementation of alternatives to incarceration. The statute reflects a unique and effective linkage of two distinct criminal justice issues to facilitate reduced reliance on confinement and more efficient utilization of that significant scarce resource -- jail beds. This legislation reduces the number of state mandated classification categories in local correctional facilities from twelve to four. However, in order for a county to take advantage of this reduced classification system, it must prepare and carry out a service plan (approved by the Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives) for the development and implementation of alternatives to incarceration. The service plan must be the collaborative product of a county advisory board composed of the key criminal justice decision makers, and must present a comprehensive overview of the local criminal justice system which serves to identify target populations, factors contributing to overcrowding, programmatic needs, and specific proposals for the use of state aid available under the bill. In fiscal year 1986-87, a total of $3,050,000 was available to all counties and the City of New York. These funds are to be distributed according to a modified population-based formula outlined in the statute.

In the two and one-half years that have passed since enactment of this legislation, important and far-reaching changes have taken place in the activities and organization of local criminal justice systems. Almost eighty percent of the jurisdictions in New York State have taken advantage of the bill's provisions. Forty-four counties and the city of New York submitted alternatives to incarceration service plans and have now implemented alternatives to incarceration programs. DUring State fiscal year 1986-87 (the second year of funding) a total of 67 programs were supported and operated consistent with the counties' service plans.

Demonstration Projects. These projects generally fall into one of four program models: community service, defendant-based advocacy, pre-trial, and offender rehabilitation/specialized services. In FY 1986-87 there were 31 such projects. During the current fiscal year, FY 1987-88, 28 of these 100% State funded projects are expected to provide services to more than 15,000 clients.

Demonstration projects are designed to reduce the incidence of incarceration through the use of community-based alternatives that emphasize public safety and cost effectiveness.

Intensive Supervision/Alternative Sentencing Program. The Intensive Supervision/Alternative Sentencing Program (ISP/ASP) is intended to provide a viable dispositional option to the courts. A cooperative effort between State and local jurisdictions, ISP/ASP provides fiscal resources to support a program model which emphasizes strict supervision and complete accountability to sentencing courts.

F-12

DIVISION OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES (continued)

The program focuses on two discrete groups from among the much larger, generally successful probation population: felony offenders sentenced to probation only because ISP/ASP supervision is available; felony and misdemeanant probationers statistically least likely to successfully complete their sentences.

During FY 1985-86, a new aspect of this overall program has been added called the Conditional Order of Probation Experiment (COPE). This new effort provides for a limited demonstration period in which the suitability of an offender for probation sentence may be determined.

PINS Adjustment Sefvices Act. Chapter 813 of the Laws of 1985 is an important new program intended to decrease the inappropriate utilization of the Family Court process and the number of out-of-home placements in matters involving persons alleged to be in need of supervision (PINS). It is the purpose of this law to implement assessment, planning, and service delivery strategies Statewide that can support successful diversion of PINS from the family court process. The Act establishes a four year period, beginning January of 1987 and ending on December 31, 1990, during which localities may voluntarily implement the provisions of the Act. -Tne Act encourages localities to set and accomplish long-term goals in planning for the delivery of a comprehensive array of services to meet the needs of these youths and families. To assist localities in coordinating and strengthening services for this population, the law provides short-term enriched incentive funding during the four year voluntary implementation period.

The January 1986-87 initial appropriation of $1 million is targeted for a start-up date of January 1, 1987.

Regular State Aid. Section 246 of the New York State Executive Law provides for financial assistance from the State to localities for probation operations " ... for control and rehabilitation of offenders." In order to receive these funds to develop and improve services, local probation departments must operate according to approved programs within the Divisionis Rules and Regulations. Current reimbursement is set at 46.5 percent of approved expenditures for maintaining and improving probation services.

During FY 1982-83 a special Warrant Enforcement Unit was funded in New York City under this program.

F-13

DIVISION FOR YOUTH

Community Based Organization. The Community Based Organization (CBO) Urban Home Initiative is a 100 percent State funded initiative which provides residential serVices for up to one year for youth ages l6~2l. There are currently two line item appropriations which support two programs in New York City (one for older homeless youth and one for Juvenile Offenders on parole); and one program in the City of Buffalo which services young mothers and their children.

Community Care Program. In response to concern over the increasing costs of residential care, recidivism, and the importance of the post-release period to a successful return to community life, the Division funds a new direction in, and emphasis on; aftercare services. The initiative, which was designed to establish, for the first time, jOint State/local cooperation in planning and implementing post-institutional follow-up services, will facilitate the successsful transition of youth released from DFY residential placement to their communities.

Secure and Non-Secure Detention Services. Designed to provide 50 percent fiscal support to localities operating secure and/or non-secure detention programs. These funds provide the Division with the leverage to assure compliance with rules ~nd regulations governing detention facilities. The nonsecure aspect of "this program has been steadily expanding to accommodate the more difficult youth in the least restrictive environment.

Job Development. The New York State Division for Youth contracts with community based organizations to provide employment/training transitional services to Division youngsters recently released or about to be returned from residential care. The Division funds programs which manifest an ability to build on the vocational foundations established during the youngster's facility placement.

Runaway and Homeless Youth Services (RHYA)/Transitional Independent Living Support. Gives the Division the authority and financial capability to support and encourage the continued establishment of local programs to setve runaway and homeless youth. This request reflects the programmatic agenda and fiscal requirements necessary to maintain and expand this program. Statutory provisions, which were modified during 1985, permit the expansion of this program into the area of providing services to the homeless and transitional youth up to age 21 and beyond the crisis services by which DFY was formerly limited.

Soecial Delinauency Prevention Program. Provides 100 percent funding for community-based youth services targeted at youth at risk to help prevent unnecessary or further involvement with the justice system. Allocations are based on a combination of youth population and/or needs assessment data.

F-14

DIVISION FOR YOUTH (continued)

Special Legislative Contracts. A legislative initiative providing funds for new or expanded youth centers, career counseling, and recreation programs.

Voluntary Agency Care. Designed to provide 50 percent fiscal support to local Departments of Social Services who are responsible for payment for care of PINS and JD youth involuntary chi1d care agencies. This request allows the Division to provide support and technical assistance to local-departments and voluntary agencies to improve services to troubled youth.

Youth Development and Delinquency Prevention. Provides local community psychosocial and recreational programs for youth through county and municipal youth bureaus. Implementation is aided through programmatic support from Division field staff and financtal assistance provided by the state aid formula of Article 19A of the Executive Law. This budget request focuses on both the programmatic and fiscal aspects of YD/DP and Youth Initiatives in creating more effective local youth se.rvices that address the pressing needs of youth.

F-15

OTHER CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES

Salaries of District Attorneys. Pursuant to County Law 700, Chapter 986, Laws of 1984, $10,000 per year is apportioned to all qualified upstate counties and to New York City for each of the counties therein for the salaries of district attorneys elected, re-elected, or appointed after April 1, 1970. Beginning in September 1985 and each year thereafter, an eligible county shall receive the difference between the base salary of the county district attorney on January 1 of the current year and December 31 of the prior year.

STOP Program - Drug Residence Project. The Selective Treatment Options for Parolees (STOP) Project i~ a cooperative effort involving State criminal justice and human services agencies to establish community-based residential treatment programs for parolees in need of chemical dependency services. The STOP Project facilities, which will be established through contracts with community-based service providers through the Division of Substance Abuse Services, will function in much the same manner as Parole Resource Centers except that the programs are targeted for individuals with drug abuse histories. Responsibility for the administration of this program was transferred from the Division of Parole to the Division of Substance Abuse Services in FY 1987-88.

F-16

I

APPENDIX G

CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

This Appendix presents funds awarded to NYC agencies that provide services citywide. These funds could not be presented by county, but are included in the NYC and State profiles.

APPENDIX G CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE >UNDS

Table 1

CITYWIDE 1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING SUMMARY (Thousands of Dollars)

Exoenditures AogroQriations % Change

~ FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Dept. of Correctional Services 4,167.3 5,411.2 6,569.2 12,649.6 203.5% 0.0 0.0

Crime Victims Board 6,216.4 8,180.8 6.732.5 6,038.0 -2.9% 6,093.3 9,970.3

Division of Criminal Justice Services 25,075.6 30,055.9 35,523.8 37,897.4 51.1% 39,893.8 44,546.7

Division of Parole 398.0 548.5 649.9 825.9 107.5% 1.850.9 1,970.9

Oivision of Probation2 and Correctional Alternatives 10,446.8 11,893.7 12,508.6 16,749.7 60.3% 19,270.1 23,553.9

Division for Youth3 29,054.7 22,384.1 25,356.5 53,951.8 85.7% 26,669.6 29,928.9

Other Local Aid

District 4 Attorney Salaries 47.5 47.5 NA 52.5

TOTAL 75,358.9 78,474.2 87,387.9 128,159.9 70.1% 94,355.2 109.970.7

1 This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services.

2 On April 1, 1985, the Alternatives to Incarceration Program was transfe~red from the Division of Criminal Justice Services and combined with the Division of Probation to form the Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives. The Alternative to Incarceration Program expenditures from FY 1982-83 through 1984-85 are included with the expenditures reported for this newly formed agency.

3

4

The FY 1985-86 DFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a pesult of Governor Cuomo's recommendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also elimlnate arrearages.

The Office of the State Comptroller administers this program.

G-1

t,POENDIX G CITY~IDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 2

DEPA~TMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exoenditures Aoorooriations

cy 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 % Change 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

:or2!:1 Nobi s

Fe1cns

Oaro:e Violators

State Readies3

Community A

Treatment Programs~

?riso~er pransfer2

TOTAL

0.0

4,167.3

0.0

0.0

4,167.3

0.0

5,196.1

0.0

215.1

0.0

5,411.2

14.8 10.9 NA

5,835.2 9,699.7 132.8%

284.9 1,659.7 NA

1,064.9 NA

434.2 NA

0,0 214 .. 4 NA

6,569.2 12,649.6 203.5% 0.0

This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services.

0.0

2 The New York City Department of Corrections (NYCDOC) operates a citywide jail system for the five boroughs of New York City. Therefore, local assistance funds from the Board of Prisoners' account are disbursed to NYCDOC rather than the individual facilities within each of the boroughs. NYCDOC is reimbursed for expenditures from the "statewide" lump-sum appropriation for this program.

3

, This program component was implemented in FY 1985-86.

This program was implemented in FY 1983-84 ar:d is funded through the State OpeT'ations Budget. 110 funds were ao~ropriat~d for this program in FY 1985-86.

SOURCE: /lYS Department of Correctional Services.

3-2


Program FY 82-83

Crime Victim 2 Compensation Awards 5,647.2


~omprehensive

Elderly

Sexual Assault

TOTAL

458.4

110.8

0.0

6,216.4

Table 3

CRIME VICTIMS BOARD CITYWIDE1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


FY 83-84

7.719.3

352.0

109.5

0.0

8,180.8

Expenditures

FY 84-85

5,960.5

580.8

191.2

0.0

6,732.5

FY B5-86

5,354.3

543.2

140.5

0.0

6,038.0

% Change 82 vs 85

-5.2%

18.5%

26.8%

NA

-2.9%

Aoorooriations

FY 86-87

5.206.0

700.3

143.6

43.3

6,093.3

FY 87-88

8.507.0

1. 203 .1

260.2

0.0

9.970.3

1 This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services.

2 FY 1982-83 through FY 1984-85 include expenditures in Nassau and Suffolk Counties.


G-3

I

APPENDIX 6 CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE "UNDS

Table 4

DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


EXllenditures Aoorooriations % Change

Program FY 82-83 F'Y 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 'IS 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Asset/Forfeiture2


Crime Prevention3

and Protection 175.0 0.0 0.0 NA 0.0 0.0

Emergency Felony Case Processing Program 1.760.3 1,893.0 2,024.5 2,090.9 18.8% 2,133.0 2,133.0

Indigent 4 Parolee Program 722.1 834.8 956.0 956.0 32.4% 1,028.0 1,069.0

Justice 5 Assistance Act NA 1.013.6

Juvenile Justice 6

and Delinquency Prevention S8G.7 978.0 1.016.6 884.0 -10.1% 975.2 1.055.1

Hajor Offense Po 1 ice Program 5,615.6 5,952.6 6,369.2 . 6,624.0 18.0% 6,756.5 7,161.9

NarcotiSs Contro1 7 NA 4,005.9

NYC School Security8 Officer Program NA 0.0 250.0

Soft Body Armour9 Reimbursement Program 0.4 0.0 NA

Special Narcotics Court Program 3,386.3 3,589.5 4,589.B 4,739.0 39.9% 4,818.1 4,902.5

Soecial Warrant E~forcement 10 Enhancement Program 1.395.0 1,299.5 NA 1. 440.0 1,400.0

Target Crime 11 InitIative Program 12,607.7 13,133.0 15,427.3 16,521.5 31.0% 16,789.5 17,433.0

Transit Crime 12 Interdiction Program 1,322.6 NA 1. 486.0 1,510.5

Transit Strike Force13 3,500.0 3,745.0 3,404.4 NA 3,353.9 3,474.6


6-4

AP?ENDIX G CITYWIDE LDCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 4-Continued



EXllend itu res Aoorooriations % Change


Community Patro114

Officer Program NA 100.0 150.0

TOTAL 25,075.6 30,055.9 35,523.8 37,897.4 51.1% 39,893.8 44,546.7

This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services.'

2 This program was implemented in FY 1984-85. The FY 1984-85 funds were awarded to the Special Narcotics Prosecutor. The FY 1985-86 appropriation was transferred to the Target Crime Initiative Program (TCI). Funds were not appropriated for FY 1986-87.


4 Agencies are reimbursed for expenditures from th'e "NYC" and "Statewide" (non-NYC) lump sum appropriations for this program.


S Expenditures and estimated appropriations for this federally funded program are based on the State's fiscal year,

7 This federally funded program was implemented in FY 1987-88. Appropriations are based on the State's fiscal year.


9 In FY 1984-85 the administration of this program was transferred from the Department of Labor to the Oivision of Criminal'Justice Services; county level expenditures for FY 1982-83 and FY 1983-84 are not ieadily available. Agencies are reimbursed for expenditures from the 'Statewide" lump-sum appropriation for this program. Unallocated FY 1985-86 monies were reappropriated for FY 1986-87.

10 This program was implemented in FY 1984-85,

11 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84; program funds are designated for all program components in the County except the District Attorney. The FY 1982-83 funds are the combined expenditures of the three programs that were merged to form TCI: the State Felony Program, the Major Violent Offense Trial Program, and the Major Offense Prosecution Program.

12 This program was implemented in FY 1985-86,

13 Thl'S '1 t d' FY 1983 84 program was Imp emen e In -.

14 This program was implemented in ~y 1986-87.

SCURCE: NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services.

G-5


Table 5

DIVISION OF PAROLE CITYWIDE1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


ExoenditlJres Aoprooriations

Parole 2 Resource Centers

Parole Transitiona13

Faci 1 ities

Employment Services4

Project

TOTAL

FY 82-83

398.0

398.0

FY 83-84 FY 84-85

511.4 477 .0

37.1 172.9

548.5 649.9

% Change FY 85-86 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

516.8 29.8% 654.8 774.8

309.1 NA 496.1 496.1

NA 700.0 700.0

825.9 107.5% 1. 850.9 1,970.9

1 This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide, citywide services.

2 This prog~am is funded through the State Operations Budget.




6-6


~

Classification2

Alternatives

Demonstration Projects

Intensive Supervision/ Alternative Sentencing Program

PINS Program3

Regu lar State A·id

TOTAL

Table 6

DIVISION OF lROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES CITYWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Expenditures

FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85

559.4 740.8 632.6

961.3 1,066.5 1,158.5

8,926.1 10,086.4 10,717.4

10,446.8 11,893.7 12,508.6

FY 85-86

1.130.9

2,074.6

1. 478.9

12,065.3

16,749.7

% Change 82 vs 85

NA

270.9%

53.8%

NA

35.2%

60.3%

Aporooriations

FY 86-87

0.0

1,664.3

3,399.3

631. 7

13,574.8

19,270.1

FY 87-88

1.302.8

2,511.7

4,569.5

1,314.6

13,855.4

23,553.9

1 This table presents local assistance program funas that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services. Some of these citywide funds may have been spent in this borough.




G-7


Table 7

DIVISION FOR YOUTH CITYWIDE1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING

(Thousands of Oollars)

EX!;lenditures AO!;lro!;lriations

FY 85-862 % Change ~ FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 82 vs 85 F'( 86-87 FY 87-88

Detention

Non-Secure 946.0 1.343.0 835.2 2,191.8 131.7% 2,213.0 5,023.6

Secure 7,569.4 5,196.0 9,641.7 16,947.8 123.9% 9,723.5 9,043.0

Runaway and Homeless Youth Services 405.8 568.2 522.9 516.6 27.3% 691.4 645.9

Special Delinquenc3 Prevention Program 4,630.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -100.0% 0.0 0.0

Transitional Independent 4 Living Support 69.7 NA 0.0 1.139.3

Voluntary Agency CareS 4,518.6 4,387.9 3,728.1 9,201.4 103.6% 0.0 0.0

Youth Development and Delinquency Prevention 10,984.9 10,889.1 10,628.5 25,024.4 127.8% 14.041.7 14,077.1

TOTAL 29,054.7 22,384.1 25,356.5 53.951.8 85.7% 26,669.6 29,928.9

This table presents local assistance program funds that were awarded to agencies in New York City that provide citywide services. Some of these citywide funds may have been spent in this borough.

2 The FY 1985-86 DFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a result of Governor Cuomo's recommendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also eliminate arrearages.

3 Borough FY 1982-83 expenditures are not available; these expenditures are reported as part of the FY 1982-83 expenditures for New York City overall.


5 The absence of a FY 1986-87 appropriation reflects the determination that the State Department of Social Services will temporarily assume responsibility for payment of New York City claims pending technical system changes to the Welfare Management System.


G-8

APPENDIX H

STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

This Appendix presents funds awarded to agencl es that provide services statewide.' These funds could not be presented by county, but are included in the State profile.

APPENDIX H STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 1

STATEWIDE 1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING SUMMARY (Thousands of Dollars)

Exoenditures Aogrooriations % Change


Dept. of Correctional Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 30.052.0 38.678.0

Crime Victims Board 821. 7 1.088.1 1.078.0 2.648.3 222.3% 3.702.5 4.190.0

Division of Criminal Justice Services 5.261.6 5.108.6 5.529.7 3.926.4 -25.4% 9.894.4 15.900.5

Qivision of Parole

Division of Probation2 and Correctional A lternat ives 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 102.8 601. 0

Oi~ision for Youth3 7.554.9 8.781.2 7.736.3 14.373.6 90.3% . 10.178.9 8.441.7

Other Local Aid

District 4 Attorney. Salaries 370.0 397.5 0.0 0.0 -100.0% 0.0 896.0

STOP Program"- DrugS Residence Project NA 525.0

TOTAL 14.008.2 15.375.5 14.344.0 20.948.3 49.5% 53.930.6 69.232.2

This table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for them at either the county or the New York City level. In addition. Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data were submitted for this publication.

2 On April 1. 1985. the Alternatives to Incarceration Program was transferred from the Division of Criminal Justice Services and combined with the Division of Probation to form the Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives. The Alternative to Incarceration Program expenditures from FY 1982-83 through 1984-85 are included with the expenditures reported for this newly formed agency.

3 The FY 1985-86 DFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a result of Governor Cuomo's recommendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also eliminate arrearages.

4 The Office of the State Comptroller administers this program.

S The responsibi~ity for the administration of this program was transferred from the Division of Parole to the Division of Substance Abuse Services in FY 1987-88. Funds for this program were first appropriated in FY 1986-87; these funds were reappropriated for FY 1987-88.

H-1

ApO::NDIX H STATEW'IDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 2

DEPARIMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exgenditures Aoorooriations % Change

~ FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 'IS 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

:::ard =f Prisoners 2

':o:-"m'lo!:J i s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 51. 5 55.5

=e'cns 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 22,770.1 25,655.4

:>a~o le Violators 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 2,936.4 5,6i5.3

State Readies 3 0.0 NA 3,528.0 5,551.8

::::rrrnunity Programs4 ireat:::ent 0.0 0.0 NA 400.0 400.0

r:risoner Transfer2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 366.0 400.0

70TAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 30,052.0 38,678.0

T~is table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for :::em at either the county or the New York City level. In addition, Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data were submitted for this publication.

- :"::ca1 correctional facilities are reimbursed for expenditures from the "statewide" lump-sum appropriation fer this program.

3 ThlS orogram component was implemented in FY 1985-86. Local correctional facilities are reimbursed for exoenditures from the "statewide" lump-sum appropriation for this program.

4 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84 and is funded through the State Operations 8udget. No funds were appropriated for this program in FY 1985-86.

SCGRCE: NYS Department of Correctional Services

H-2

APPENDIX H STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE F"UNDS

Table 3

CRIME VICTIMS BOARD STATEWIDE1 LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


EX12enditures Aoorooriations % Change

Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85 F~ 86-87 FY 87-88

Crime Victim Compensation Awards2 821. 7 1. 088.1 1.078.0 2.648.3 222.3% 2.803.0 4.190.0


Comprehensive 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 899.5 0.0

TOTAL 821.7 1.088.1 1.078.0 2.648.3 222.3% 3.702.5 4.190.0

This table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for them at either the county or the New York City leve1. In addition. Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data were submitted for this publicat.ion.

2 FY 1982-83 through FY 1984-85 exclude expenditures in the New York City boroughs and Nassau and Suffolk Counties. FY 1985-86 and FY 1986-87 exclude expenditures in the New York City boroughs only.


H-3

APPENDIX H STATE\.IIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 4

DIVISI2N OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES STATE\.IIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exoenditures Aoorooriations % Change


Asset/Forfeiture2


Crime Prevention3 and Protection 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 0.0 695.0

Indigent· 4 Parolee Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 NA 597.8 628.4

Just ice 5 Assistance Act NA 1,611.6

Juvenile Justice6

and Delinquency Prevention 1.309.1 1. 057.0 975.4 0.0 -100.0% 1. 088.9 1.078.9

Major Offense Po 1 ice Program 5QO.0 530.0 567.1 0.0 -100.0% 0.0 0.0

Narcotics Contro1 7 NA 6.070.2

Neighborhood8

Preservation Crime Prevention Act 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 2.500.0 2.500.0

NYS Defenders' Association 442.4 442.4 540.0 572.0 29.3% 630.0 797.5

Prisoners' Legal Services 1.361.8 1,361.8 2,207.1 2,545.4 86.9% 2.679.3 2.78.i.2

Soft Body Armour 9

Reimbursement Program 635.5 535.5 0.0 60.1 -90.5% 487.0

Special Warrant Enforcement 10 Enhancement Program 0.0 0.0 NA 20.0 10.0


H-4

APPENDIX H STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE -UNDS

Target Crime 11 Initiative Program 1.012.9

TOTAL 5,261.6

Table 4-Continued



1.182.0 1.240.1 746.8

5,108.6 5,529.7 3,926.4

-26.3% 766.8 849.3

-25.4% 9,894.4 15,900.5

This table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for them at either the county or the New York City level. In addition, Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data were submitted for this puolication.

2 This program was implemented in FY 1984-85. FY 1985-86 appropriation of $1,000,000 was reappropriated for FY 1986-87 and again for FY 1987-88.


4 Agencies are reimbursed for expenditures from the "NYC" and "Statewide" (non-NYC) lump sum appropriations for this program.


6 Expenditures and estimated appropriations for this federally funded program are based on the State's fisca 1 year.

7 This federally funded program was implemented in FY 1987-88. Appropriations are based on the State's fiscal year.

8 This Act was established in FY 1983-84.

9 In FY 1984-85 the administration of this program was transferred from the Department of Labor to the Division of Criminal Justice Services; county level expenditures for FY 1982-83 and FY 1983-84 are not readily available. Agencies are reimbursed for expenditures from the 'Statewide' lump-sum appropriation for this program. Unallocated FY 1985-86 monies were reappropriated for FY 1986-87.


11 This program was implemented in FY 1983-84. The FY 1982-83 funds are the combined expenditures of the three programs that were merged to form TCI: the State Felony Program, the MaJor Violent Offense Trial Program, and the Major Offense Prosecution Program.

SOURCE: NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services.

H-S

APPENDIX H

Table 5

DIVISION OF PAROLE STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS

Table 5 is not presented because there were no local assistance program funds awarded to agencies that prcvide services Statewide.

';-5


Table 6

DIVISION OF P~OBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES STATEWIDE LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


EXllenditures Allorooriations % Change

Program FY 82-83 i- 'r 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Class~fication2 Alternatives 0.0 NA 0.0 83.2

Demonstration Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 100.0 39.5

Intensive Supervisionl Alternative Sentencing Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 0.0 199.3

PINS Program3 NA 2.8 0.0

Regular State Aid 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 0.0 279.0

TOTAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA 102.8 601.0

This table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for them at either the county or the New York City level. In addition. Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data were submitted for this publication.




H-7


Table 7

DIVISION FOR YOUTH STATEWIDE! LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDING


Exoenditures Aoorooriations

FY 85.-862 % Change Program FY 82-83 FY 83-84 FY 84-85 82 vs 85 FY 86-87 FY 87-88

Corrmunity Care3

Initiative NA 219.0 219.0

Special Delinquency Prevention Program 37.3 168.3 35.0 1,951.4 5.131.7% 131.9 0.0

Special L~gislative Contracts"" 0.0 0.0 0.0 330.0 NA 274.5 0.0

Voluntary Agency Care5 7,517.6 8,613.0 7,701.3 12,092.2 60.9% 9,553.5 .8,222.7

TOTAL 7,554.9 8,781.2 7,736.3' 14,373.6 90.3% 10,178.9 8,441.7

This table presents local assistance program funds that are disbursed in ways which preclude accounting for them at either the county or the New York City level. In addition, Statewide "appropriations" may include funds that had not yet been disbursed at the time these data. were submitted for this publication.

2 The FY 1985-86 DFY budget increased 58 percent over the appropriation for the previous fiscal year as a result of Governor Cuomo's recorrmendation. This increase allowed DFY to pay for current programs and also el:minate arrearages.


4 Programs for which addresses are unavailable.

5 Payment to State Department of Social Services for State share of JD/PINS who are ADC/FC eligible.


H-8

APPENDIX I

JUVENILE OFFENDER OFFENSES

AGE OFFENSES

13-15 Murder 2nd 14 15 Murder 2nd2

Kidnapping lst2 Arson 1st Manslaughter 1st Rape 1st Sodomy 1st Aggravated Sexual

" Robbery 1st " Burglary 1st " Arson 2nd " Robbery 2nd II Assau It 1st II Buralarv 2nd

JUVENILE OFFENDER CRIMES1

(as of 1/1/87) .

PL SECTION NUMBER

125.25 125.25 135.25 150.20 125.20 130.35 130.50

Abuse3 130.70 160.15 140.30 150.15 160.10 120.10 140.25

IPenal Law of the State of New York, Section 10.00(18).

SUB- FELONY DIVISION CLASS

01,02 A-I 03 A-I all A-I all A-I all B

01,02 B 0.1,02 B all B all B all B 00 B 02 C

01,02 C 01 C

2An "attempt" to commit this crime is also classified as a "violent felony offense"; an attempt is one felony class lower than the actual commission of

the crime.

3Effective 9/1/81.

I-I

REFERENCES

Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government. 1983-84 New York State Statistical Yearbook. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York at Albany, 1984.

New York State Commission of Correction. Office of Program and Policy Analysis.

New York State Crime Victims Board. Administrative Services.

New York State Department of Commerce. New York State Data Center.

New York State Department of Correctional Services. Office of Program Planning, Research and Evaluation and the Public Information Office.

New York State Department of Labor. Resident Employment Status and the Civilian Labor Force: January 1984 - October 1986.

New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. Research and Developm~nt.

New York State Department of Social Services. Public Information Office.

New.York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. Office of Justice Systems Analysis and the Office of Administrative Services.

New York State Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook (1977).

New York State Division of Parole. Evaluation and Planning and the Office of Administrative Services.

New York State Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives. Research and Evaluation and the Finance Office.

County Programming for Alternatives to Incarceration, Third Annual Report. March, 1987.

New York State Division for Youth. Administration and Financial Management.

New York State Education Department. Information Center on Education.

New York State Legislature. Penal Law. Flushing, N.Y.: Looseleaf Law Publications, Inc., 1984.

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. United States Census of PODulation: 1980. Vol.l, Characteristics of the Population, PC '80-1-B34.

R-l

ORDER FORM

Other volumes of the Criminal Justice Profiles publication that are available are listed below. When ordering regional volumes please refer to the New York State Regional Map on the back of this page. The map identifies the regions and the counties located within each of the regions. Each requester will receive one volume free of charge; a $2.00 charge to covrr postage and handling will be applied to each additional volume requested.

To order by phone, please call (518) 457-8381.

To order by mail, please place a check mark ) next to the volumes you would 1 i ke.

Volume I Vol ume II Vol ume III Volume IV Volume V Volume VI Vol ume VII Vol ume VI II Volume IX Volume X Volume XI Vo 1 ume XII Vol ume XIII

New York State Binghamton Region Buffalo Region Capital Regi on El mi ra· Reg ion Lower Hudson Region and Long Island Region Mid-Hudson Region Mohawk Valley Region New York City Region Northern Region Rochester Region Syracuse Region Major Metropolitan Areas (Erie, Monroe, Nassau, ·Onondaga, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties)

Please fill in your name and address below and mail this form to:

Bureau of Statistical Services NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services Executive Park Tower, 8th Floor Stuyvesant Plaza Albany, New York 12203

NAME __________________________________________ __

TITLE __________________________________________ _

AGENCY_-___________________ _

ADDRESS ________________________________________ __

C IT)' ________________ _ STATE, _____ ZI P ___ _

TELEPHONE NUMBER. _________________ _

IThis charge does not apply to New York State agencies or officials.

~, u.q ONIAIIIO

---

CA n ARAUGUS !II AllfGAIIY STfUDEti TIOGA BROOME

NEW YORK STATE LOWER HUDSON

REGIONS and COUNTIES ,:1'

@ .. ?. u'L

NEW lONG ISLAND REGION 1

,'ft.] <-

COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFILES - New OJP Resources

Documents

Transcript of COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFILES - New OJP Resources