APN Volume I (BA 1-4) - SECRETARY OF THE NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009

BUDGET ESTIMATES

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2007

FY2007

EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST

"In accordance with the President's Management Agenda, Budget and Performance Integration initiative, this program has been assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). Remarks regarding program performance and plans for performance improvement can be located at the Expectmore.gov website."

1

Department of the Navy FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request

Introductory Statement

Funds are required to support Sailors and Marines while they prepare to deploy, to cover their operations and sustainment during deployments, and to reintegrate them upon their return. Given the pace of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the supplemental funds are required to continue current operations. Without additional funds, ultimately the Navy will not be able to cover the incremental costs of operations. The chart below displays the Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request by appropriation.

Dollars in millionsTitle IX

Supplemental Request

Navy DON Request

Military Personnel, Navy (MPN) 143 692 835Reserve Personnel, Navy (RPN) 0 73 73Operation and Maintenance, Navy (O&MN) 1,615 5,040 6,655Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve (O&MNR) 10 111 121Aircraft Procurement, Navy (APN) . 487 731 1,218Procurement Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (PANMC) 0 75 75Other Procurement, Navy (OPN) 320 745 1,065Weapons Procurement, Navy (WPN) 109 172 281Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (RDT&EN) 231 228 459National Defense Sealift Fund (NDSF) 0 5 5Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) 0 32 32Family Housing Operations (FHOPS) 0 0 0Military Construction, Navy (MCON) 0 391 391Military Construction, Naval Reserve (MCNR) 0

USN Total Subtotal 2,915 8,295 11,210

Military Personnel, Marine Corps (MPMC) 146 1,387 1,533Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (RPMC) 15 0 15Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps (O&MMC) 2,689 1,401 4,090Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve (O&MMCR) 48 14 62Procurement, Marine Corps (PMC) 4,898 2,056 6,954Procurement Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (PANMC) 128 85 213Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (RDT&EN) 0 232 232

USMC Subtotal 7,924 5,175 13,099

DON Grand Total - Supplemental 10,839 13,470 24,309

DON FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental

2

Justification by Category Operations

Funds requested support higher operating tempo and incremental costs associated

with activation of reserve personnel and units, increased fuel consumption and spare parts, additional maintenance supporting higher usage of equipment, deployment of medical capabilities, extended communications and intelligence support, related transportation costs, and investments in new capabilities. In particular, expected operations/contributions in FY 2007 military and civil support in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) for the U.S. Navy will include the items below:

Military Personnel: Incremental pay and allowances for Navy/Marine Corps military and civilian personnel, including Reserve components called to active duty, special pays and entitlements, and USMC over-strength.

Navy-specific areas of support are focused on the following items: - Active duty personnel overseas deployment costs and mobilization /

deployment costs for the called-up Navy Reserve personnel. Current GWOT deployment costs support a force of over 39,000 active duty Sailors and nearly 5,500 Navy Reservists. Pay and benefits for mobilized / deployed personnel entails additional base pay and allowance entitlements, hazardous duty pays, and special skills pays.

- Additional Permanent Change of Station (PCS) costs associated with GWOT-related personnel moves in support of GWOT operational tasking.

- Naval personnel casualty and disability benefits needs, including death gratuities, premium payments, and additional payments for VA support.

- Additional security personnel and Naval base administrative services in order to provide greater force protection and logistics for GWOT-associated operational support.

Marine Corps-specific areas of support are focused on the following items: - Reserve mobilization costs and deployment costs associated with GWOT.

Current GWOT deployment costs support a force of 12,000 active duty and 9,000 Reserve Marines. Pay and benefits for active and reserve Marines entails additional base pay and allowance entitlements, hazardous duty pays, and special skill pays.

- Overstrength pay and entitlements. The Marine Corps currently is supporting an additional 6,500 Marines above the authorized normal end strength of 175,000 in order to maintain adequate readiness levels and support GWOT.

- Marine personnel casualty and disability benefits needs, including death gratuities, premium payments, and additional payments for VA support.

- Recruiting and retention costs associated with bonus programs targeted at retaining specially skilled and experienced personnel in the Marine Corps.

3

- Pre-deployment training and logistics costs. These include additional home base services to support force protection and family support organizations which are burdened more heavily by the increased number of personnel deployed (such as child care provisions and family counseling services).

Personnel Support : Includes TAD/TDY costs, clothing and personnel equipment,

and Reserve component activation/deactivation. Navy-specific areas of support are focused on the following items: - Travel costs, including per diem and lodging for aviation squadron

personnel deployed in support of land-based flight operations as part of GWOT in Iraq and Afghanistan.

- Travel costs associated with the TAD/TDY assignments in support of GWOT of numerous staff teams, technical assistance personnel, security detachments, auditing service personnel, specialized maintenance technicians, logistical support teams, communications and surveillance system personnel, combat camera crews, and security and working dog teams.

- Additional costs for individual and organizational clothing and equipment, excluding body armor, that is necessary for deployed military and civilian personnel to participate in, or support, contingency operations associated with GWOT.

- Costs associated with additional Casualty Assistance Case Managers needed to handle increased case amount demands as a result of GWOT. Also, funds to cover costs of servicemembers’ family travel in order to visit seriously ill/injured personnel, as well as, family member travel to funerals of Navy personnel involved in GWOT.

Marine Corps areas of support are focused on the following items: - Funds for travel of personnel involved as individual augmentees in

support of pre-deployment exercises or as individual augmentees in the Horn of Africa and Afghanistan.

- Funds replacement for medical supplies used in Iraq, such as aid station equipment, acute care ward equipment and supplies, en route care systems, vehicle medical kits, 1st aid kits and other routine medical supplies.

- Travel funds, including per diem and travel costs, to support the mobilization of 9,000 Reserve Marines involved in operations in Iraq.

- Morale, Welfare and Recreation funds needed to support the increased demand for family services at bases and stations across the Marine Corps. Funds requested include staff additions for counseling services, additional child care services, departure/returning briefs, literature publications, and temporary storage requirements.

- Costs associated with additional Casualty Assistance Case Managers needed to handle increased case amount demands as a result of GWOT. Also, funds to cover costs of servicemembers’ family travel in order to

4

visit seriously ill/injured personnel, as well as, family member travel to funerals of Marine personnel involved in GWOT.

- TAD / TDY travel and per diem costs related to support and logistics personnel performing contingency tasking in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa.

Operating Tempo : Incremental costs to support traditional Naval Forces (Carrier

Strike Groups, Expeditionary Strike Groups), aviation support (Carrier Air Wings and land-based Maritime Patrol and support aircraft) conducting Maritime Security Operations. This includes funding for materials/supplies, training, operating tempo (flying, steaming and ground equipment), C4I, facilities, base support, and support to Coalition Forces. These funds also include the recovery of fuel price increases above the budgeted level.

Navy-specific areas of support are focused on the following items: - Incremental cost of flying and steaming hours above baseline supporting

the GWOT, plus materials and services used during an operation, to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, and assemblies. This funding provides for operationally necessitated flight hours increasing from 18.2 flight hours per crew per quarter to 23 flight hours, and expanded the ship steaming days requirement, increasing from 37 deployed steaming days per quarter to 55 days.

- Funding for Navy responsibilities as Executive Agent for Joint Task Force Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA).

- Costs associated with pre-deployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation. Includes preparing Sailors for CENTCOM assignment; Individual Augmentee Combat Training, Riverine; Vertical Boarding Search and Seizure (VBSS).

- Renting, leasing or purchasing of supplies and equipment in support of contingency operations. This includes vehicles, buoys and floaters for Flight and Chart Surveys, contract flight time, office supplies, night vision camera equipment, hydration gear, special ops goggles, and other mission support material.

- The cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to support the contingency operations.

- Funds for road repair at Naval Weapons Station Earle to enable transport of ordnance from storage magazines to waterfront piers for loading.

- Adjustment to baseline funding for increased costs of fuel. Marine Corps areas of support are focused on the following items: - Incremental cost of flying hours above baseline supporting the GWOT,

plus materials and services used during an operation, to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, and assemblies. This funding provides

5

for operationally necessitated flight hours increasing from 18.2 flight hours per crew per quarter to 23 flight hours.

- Short-term costs increase due to the consolidation of bases in Iraq and the corresponding increase in demand on current facilities.

- Communications and control capabilities enhancements in facilities in the Horn of Africa and Iraq.

- Renting, leasing or purchasing of supplies and equipment in support of contingency operations, including contract labor and construction contracts.

- Funding for replacement of personal equipment used in theater, such as helmets and military clothing.

- Operations funding for Mojave Viper pre-deployment training, to include role players, support personnel, and training staff. Provides contractor support to Marine Expeditionary Force Simulation Centers, Combined Arms Staff Trainers, Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Information Systems Training Centers, and MAGTF Staff Training Program.

- Adjustment to baseline funding for increased costs of fuel. - Support for increased recruiting program needs in order to meet

accession goals. Transportation: Supports the incremental costs associated with deployment and

redeployment, as well as in-theater sustainment (including airlift, sealift, port handling and mail delivery).

Navy-specific areas of support are focused on the following items: - Transportation of Navy personnel, equipment, and material by air either

by commercial or military assets or by sea using commercial or active duty naval ships.

- Other transportation logistics costs not associated with air, sea or port handling. This includes items such as vehicle rentals, small boat usage, and intra-theater airlift not associated with the actual overseas deployment.

Marine Corps areas of support are focused on the following items: - Funding to provide higher cost commercial airline transportation to units

and individuals when military air flights are committed to other priorities and unavailable.

Reconstitution Funds are required to reconstitute Navy/Marine Corps forces to capability levels existing before GWOT operations. It includes actions necessary to restore units to a desired level of combat capability commensurate with the unit’s future mission. Reset encompasses maintenance and supply activities that restore and enhance combat capability to unit and pre-positioned equipment that was destroyed, damaged, stressed, or worn out beyond economic repair due to combat operations by repairing, rebuilding, or procuring

6

replacement equipment. These maintenance and supply activities involve Depot (Sustainment) repairs/overhauls centrally managed to specified standards. Without requested funding, efforts to continue the ongoing fight, and simultaneously address the postwar need to maintain future warfighting readiness will not be achieved. Major elements of the request include:

Marine Corps Ground Equipment: The Marine Corps requires funds to restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war levels or upgrade to a future capability required for continued GWOT operations. These funds support the following programs:

• A passenger and recovery variant of the AAV in order to sustain an amphibious capability prior to the fielding of the EFV.

• The Improved Target Acquisition System to provide long range, lethal anti-armor fire to the anti-armor sections in the infantry and tank battalions. Funding supports a deployable, self-contained, and centralized facility which provides digital, shared Command and Control/Situational Awareness functionalities to enhance the Common Operational Picture (COP) for all elements of the MAGTF.

• An Enterprise Land Mobile Radio (E-LMR) network to provide a single, integrated public safety LMR communications system for all public safety and base installation personnel along with various other radios.

• Expandable Capacity Vehicle variants -- improved versions of the standard HMMWV with a heavier chassis and improved engine that enables the use of removable add-on-armor protection that provides greater tactical flexibility for deploying units.

• G-Boss surveillance systems to provide persistent tracking of objects of interest in the Marine forces' continuous efforts to prevent or mitigate hostile actions and evolving threats associated with GWOT.

• Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles to replace lightly protected trucks.

Naval Aircraft : The FY 2007 Supplemental request funds the procurement of six

EA-18G Growlers, to replace the EA-6B in the Airborne Electronic Attack role due to excessive airframe stress from GWOT operations. Additionally, funds are requested for modifications/upgrades to ensure capability is preserved or new required capabilities meet operational commanders’ GWOT requirements. The request includes the following aircraft modifications designed to replace or upgrade capabilities required to support GWOT operations. Modifications include:

• An upgraded ICAP III system to transform the electronic warfare capability and situational awareness in the EA-6B as well as an enhanced USQ-113 Jamming Capability upgrade that will modify existing hardware to enhance the jamming effectiveness of the system

• F-18 Series modifications will include a 3rd generation Litening Targeting ISR pod to support USMC expeditionary F/A-18 deployments as well as adding a data link capability to 88 ATFLIR pods.

7

• H-46 Series modifications will include Blue Force Tracking for CH-46E. This battlefield C2 system will be more effective and reliable than the current system and will be common with the US Army FBCB2 system.

• AH-1W modifications will also integrate Blue Force Tracker as part of an upgraded cockpit control system replacing the cockpit display navigation unit and interface control unit. In addition, H-1 Series aircraft require Navigation Thermal Imaging System (NTIS) BRITE Star, which is an electro-optical sensor with eye safe laser rangefinder, a laser designator and charge coupled day TV camera for increased target detection, recognition and identification.

• C-130 series modifications include Defensive Electronic Counter Measures/Night Vision Lighting for the Marine Corps to reduce the risk of combat losses due to heat seeking and radar guided threats.

Navy Ground Equipment : The FY 2007 Supplemental request provides critical construction and force protection equipment for the Naval Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC). NECC provides task-organized combat support and combat service support forces with sufficient capability and capacity to meet the requirements for major combat operations, the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and homeland defense. The Naval Construction Force (Seabees) component provides expeditionary engineering (combat construction) to Navy and Marine Corps operating forces. Major equipment types requested for the Seabees include:

• Tactical vehicles: Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles are requested to replace current HMMWV lacking adequate armor protection.

• Construction Equipment: Request includes bulldozers, scrapers, concrete mixers, graders and loaders and support equipment such as air compressors, generators, and welders.

• Also requested are special purpose trucks to support containers, panel boards, reverse osmosis units and other pieces of minor equipment.

The newly formed Riverine Force will re-establish a Navy capability to conduct and support operations predominantly in the inland waterway, or “brown water” areas of the maritime environment. Major equipment being requested for the Riverine squadrons includes tactical vehicles and small boats. Funds will procure Up-Armored HMMWVs, MRAPs, Multi-Mission Craft and Command and Control Craft.

For the remaining NECC components (Explosive Ordnance Disposal, Naval Expeditionary Logistics Support Group, Expeditionary Security Force) tactical vehicles, force protection equipment and support equipment are requested. Specific items include Up-Armored HMMWVs, MRAPs, armored kits, Blue Force Trackers and electronic countermeasures, as well as 150-man tent camps, forklifts, and small boats.

Weapons/Ammunition: The FY 2007 Supplemental requests funds for 30 JSOW missiles to replace quantities expended during OIF/OEF. Additionally, funds are requested to procure and install 60 MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mounts, on-board repair parts kits and special tool kits. The request also replaces unserviceable small arms and weapons which are beyond economical repair and provides a variety of vital small arms and weapons to the various elements of the Naval Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC),

8

such as Naval Construction Force, Explosive Ordnance Disposal, Naval Coastal Warfare, etc. Finally, funds are requested to procure a Marine Corps Tactical Unmanned Aerial System and associated support to begin the transition of Pioneer to Shadow UAS. The MCTUAS will provide Marine Corps combat units with immediate interoperability and commonality with Army Shadow units.

Depot Maintenance: The FY-2007 Supplemental requests funds for Aircraft, Ships and Support Equipment for maintenance performed at the depot level facility, to include cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Major components include:

• Airframe rework • Engine rework • Aeronautical components • Ship operating systems • Ground command and control equipment • Countermeasures

Military Construction : The FY 2007 Supplemental request funds for electrical

power and water production facilities and water storage and wastewater treatment facilities at Camp Lemonier, Djibouti to provide critical infrastructure in support of Joint Task Force, Horn of Africa. Failure to fund the Djibouti projects will increase the logistics footprint in a high threat environment, putting additional troops at risk. The request also supports a critical facility at Guantanamo Bay to house switching gear and diesel generators in support of GWOT operations. Failure to fund will increase the risk of power failure and excessive O&M funding to maintain temporary generators. Finally, the request includes projects at Camp Lejeune, NC in support of additional Marine Corps end strength. Projects include: a maintenance complex and two Company Operations complexes; EOD and headquarters building additions; and enlisted quarters and mess facilities. Failure to fund these projects will further increase already overcrowded enlisted quarters and mess facilities. Force Protection Equipment One of our primary concerns is protecting Sailors, Marines, infrastructure and equipment essential to mission accomplishment. As technology advances are applied to emerging warfighter requirements, will continue to bolster our force protection capabilities through the next generation of personal protective equipment, vehicle hardening, explosive device jammers, and immediate adaptation of new tactics techniques and procedures (TTP’S) through lessons learned. Failure to fully fund the request will potentially result in higher casualties and increased damage to critical infrastructure. Examples of protective equipment include:

• Automated entry control systems/equipment

9

• Armored and utility vehicles • Chemical and biological detection, mitigation, and protective equipment • Communications equipment (including personnel alerting systems) • Delay and denial technology (including fences, barriers [active, passive,

portable, and fixed], and locks) • Explosives detection (including hand-held, static, and underwater) • Explosive ordnance disposal equipment • Individual protective equipment • Vulnerability assessment/analysis software tools • Waterside security equipment

Military Intelligence Programs Narrative Justification: Funding is required for Military Intelligence programs to enhance intelligence collection and processing capabilities of the Navy and Marine Corps and in direct support of Combatant Commander supported operations. Funds various manned and unmanned reconnaissance systems and other efforts held at a higher classification level. Without requested funding, naval forces will not be able to sustain the mission critical platforms for collection, surveillance, exploitation and dissemination of intelligence required to support GWOT operations. CONPLAN 7500 Narrative Justification: Funding is required to support the Department of Defense (DoD) campaign plan for the GWOT. The purpose of this plan is to operationalize the national Military Strategic Plan for the War on Terrorism (NMSP-WOT). This plan will synchronize supporting campaign plans and major operations; establish intelligence priorities; and prioritize resources in pursuit of designated strategic objectives. The U.S. Joint Forces Command and the Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, as Combatant Commanders, will complement and support the United States Government led international effort to systematically deny terrorist networks what they require to operate and survive and contribute to the overarching national goals of disrupting and attacking the enemy, and protecting the American homeland.

FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request

Military Personnel

1

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

FY 2007 Supplemental Request

FOR

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) AND

OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF)

NAVY MILITARY PERSONNEL

February 2007

2

MILITARY PERSONNEL TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 M-1 Detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 ACTIVE NAVY MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS Reserve Mobilization/Deployment Costs Basic Pay, Officer.................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Retired Pay Accrual, Officer ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Basic Allowance for Housing, Officer ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Basic Allowance for Subsistence, Officer.............................................................................................................................................. 14 Incentive & Special Pays, Officer .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Social Security Tax, Officer ................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Basic Pay, Enlisted.................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Retired Pay Accrual, Enlisted................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Basic Allowance for Housing, Enlisted ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Incentive & Special Pays, Enlisted ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 Social Security Tax, Enlisted ................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Basic Allowance for Subsistence, Enlisted............................................................................................................................................ 29 Subsistence-in-Kind, Officer and Enlisted ........................................................................................................................................... 30 Permanent Change of Station Travel Accession Travel...................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Operational Travel.................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Rotational Travel .................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Separation Travel.................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Casualty and Disability Benefits Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI)................................................................................................................................... 36

3

Traumatic Injury Protection Coverage (T-SGLI) ............................................................................................................................... 36 Death Gratuities ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Additional Mobilization/Deployment Costs Unemployment Compensation............................................................................................................................................................... 39 Reserve Mobilization Income Insurance .............................................................................................................................................. 39 NAVY RESERVE PERSONNEL COSTS

Reserve Component Training and Support Pay Group A Training (Inactive Duty Training)................................................................................................................................. 41 Special Training (Active Duty for Training) ........................................................................................................................................ 42 School Training (Active Duty for Training)......................................................................................................................................... 43

4

MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW

The FY 2007 Supplemental requests funds so that the United States may continue its security stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and the global fight against terrorism. These deployments are in addition to the daily military operations around the globe. Without additional funds in FY 2007, the Navy would have to use funds from their readiness and investment accounts to finance the continuing costs of military operations. In FY 2007, Navy military personnel costs are averaging about $62 million per month for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and $14 million per month for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Absorbing costs of this magnitude would seriously degrade combat operations and would weaken the nation’s ability to react to future threats. This request includes $764.927 million for Navy military personnel costs as shown in the following tables:

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007Total Actual Title IX Supplemental Total Estimate

Summary by AppropriationMilitary Personnel, Navy 915,474 143,296 692,127 835,423 Reserve Personnel, Navy 103,512 - 72,800 72,800

1,018,986 143,296 764,927 908,223

Basic Allowance for Housing FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007Memo Entry - Cost included above Total Actual Title IX Supplemental Total EstimateMilitary Personnel, Navy (82,260) - (83,265) (83,265) Reserve Personnel, Navy (5,942) - (3,151) (3,151)

(88,202) - (86,416) (86,416)

($ in Thousands)

($ in Thousands)

The following table reflects mobilization and deployment assumptions. Mobilization numbers include personnel deployed to theater as well as personnel remaining in CONUS supporting OEF and OIF.

Average StrengthFY 2007

Active Navy Deployment 32,519Navy Reserve Mobilization 5,464

5

Active NavyNavy Reserve Total

FY 2007 Request (net request)Reserve & Guard Mobilization/Deployment Costs 639,997 639,997 Permanent Change of Station 34,500 34,500 Casualty and Disability 17,630 17,630 Pre and Post Mobilization Training - 72,800 72,800 Total Military Personnel 692,127 72,800 764,927

($ in Thousands)

In response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the President invoked his authority (10 U.S.C 12302) to order to active duty Ready Reserve members and delegated his authority to the Secretary of Defense in Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001. This declaration of national emergency has been extended, thereby continuing the authority to order to active duty Ready Reserve members. In order to sustain current military operations, funding is requested to finance the incremental costs (i.e., pay, allowances, subsistence, and other personnel costs) for personnel mobilized for duty in support of OIF and OEF. The Navy’s military personnel requirement of $764.927 million is comprised of the following major costs:

Reserve Mobilization/Deployment Costs ($639.997 million)

• Basic military pay and entitlements (e.g., Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), retired pay accrual and social security contributions, incentive pays, etc.) for Reserve members on active duty to provide essential military operation support or backfill for those active personnel deployed overseas in support of OIF and OEF.

• Special Pays for Mobilized Reserve Personnel: • Imminent Danger Pay (IDP) ($225 per month), • Family Separation Allowance (FSA) ($250 per month), • Hardship Duty-location Pay ($100 per month if deployed for less than 12 months and $300 per month if deployed for more

than 12 months),

• Subsistence for all Active and Reserve Component members in support of OIF and OEF.

• Additional Mobilization/Deployment Benefits for unemployment benefits to ex-Servicemembers who are discharged or released under honorable conditions and the Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP).

6

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: If not funded, the Navy will not be able to meet its mission requirements to the degree needed. The Navy continues to expand its role in OIF and OEF in order to reduce some of the stress experienced by the Army and Marine Corps.

Permanent Change of Station ($34.500 million)

• The Permanent Change of Station (PCS) program pays for travel, transportation, storage, and dislocation allowances for reassignment of military members and their families traveling individually or as part of an organized unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Costs are for the dislocation allowance, shipment of household goods, temporary and non-temporary storage of household goods, temporary lodging expense, and member mileage and per diem.

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: The use of mobilized reservists to fill mission requirements requires PCS dollars to both access and separate them from their home to the nearest processing site. If not funded, the Navy will not be able to place Servicemembers and their families in the necessary locations.

Casualty and Disability Benefits ($17.630 million)

• Casualty Benefits – $17.630 million for the following benefits associated with the death or traumatic injury of Servicemembers.

• Funding is for SGLI/T-SGLI insurance premiums that the Department of Defense pays on behalf of Servicemembers ($6.629 million).

• Death Gratuity payments to survivors of members dying on active duty ($11.001 million) IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: Funding for payments to the Department of Veterans Affairs was provided in Title IX of the FY 2007 Defense Appropriations Act. The remainder of the request covers the payment of SGLI/T-SGLI premiums for Servicemembers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Death gratuity funds are required to comply with Section 664 of the FY 2006 National Defense Authorization Act, which increased the rate from $12,000 (indexed) to $100,000 for each death. Baseline funds are not available to pay this increase.

7

Pre and Post Mobilization Training ($72.8 million) • Military pay and allowances associated with Inactive Duty Training drill periods to be performed in support of Navy

commands conducting Global War on Terror (GWOT) mission-related training and operations.

• Military pay and allowances associated with Navy Reservists supporting Navy commands in an Active Duty for Training (ADT) status to provide operational support for Navy commands involved in GWOT mission-related training and operations.

• Military pay and allowances associated with Navy Reservists attending training schools in an ADT status to obtain skill-sets necessary to fulfill the capabilities requirements of GWOT missions.

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: These funds are needed so that the Navy may continue deployments for its security and stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan among other GWOT missions. These deployments are in addition to the daily military operations around the globe. Without additional funds in FY 2007, the Navy would have to use funds from their readiness and investment accounts to finance the continuing costs of military operations. Absorbing costs of this magnitude would seriously degrade combat operations and would weaken the nation’s ability to respond to future threats. The following table reflects the amounts requested for military personnel by appropriation and by M-1 line item broken between Supplemental and Title IX requirements.


MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVYBUDGET ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERSBASIC PAY 93,925 - 78,148 78,148 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 24,690 - 20,681 20,681 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 22,733 - 20,374 20,374 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 2,398 - 2,233 2,233 SPECIAL PAYS 21,501 5,276 43,929 49,205 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 7,051 - 5,966 5,966 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 172,298 5,276 171,331 176,607

($ in Thousands)

8


BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTEDBASIC PAY 137,618 - 145,279 145,279 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 36,120 - 38,494 38,494 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 59,527 - 62,891 62,891 SPECIAL PAYS 93,367 23,520 152,440 175,960 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10,418 - 11,110 11,110 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 337,050 23,520 410,214 433,734

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNELBASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 2,098 - 14,103 14,103 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND - - 13,149 13,149 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 2,098 - 27,252 27,252

BUDGET ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVELACCESSION TRAVEL 1,608 - 7,911 7,911 TRAINING TRAVEL - - - - OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 7,659 - 15,936 15,936 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 4,815 - 4,437 4,437 SEPARATION TRAVEL 1,608 - 6,216 6,216 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS - - - - TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 15,690 - 34,500 34,500

BUDGET ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTSINTEREST ON SOLDIERS DEPOSITS - - - - RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 3,000 - 3,000 3,000 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 62,440 - 28,200 28,200 DEATH GRATUITIES 223,972 11,875 11,001 22,876 SGLI/TSGLI INSURANCE PREMIUM 2,097 - 6,629 6,629 SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 82,880 100,300 - 100,300 TRAUMATIC INJURY PROTECTION COVERAGE (T-SGLI) 13,950 2,325 - 2,325 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 388,339 114,500 48,830 163,330

TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 915,474 143,296 692,127 835,423

($ in Thousands)

9

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

Total Actual Title IX Supplemental Total EstimateRESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVYBUDGET ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORTUNIT TRAINING 35,008 - 35,000 35,000 UNIT TRAINING (BAH) - SPECIAL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) 51,422 22,689 22,689 SPECIAL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) (BAH) 5,572 2,111 2,111 SCHOOL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) 11,140 - 11,960 11,960 SCHOOL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) (BAH) 370 1,040 1,040 RERUITING AND RETENTION - - - - DISABILITY AND DEATH GRATUITY - - - - OTHER PROGRAMS - TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 103,512 - 72,800 72,800

GRAND TOTAL NAVY MILITARY PERSONNEL 1,018,986 143,296 764,927 908,223

($ in Thousands)

10

RESERVE MOBILIZATION ACTIVE DEPLOYMENT

11

Appropriation: Military Personnel, Navy FY 2007

Budget Activity 1: Pay and Allowances of Officers ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Basic Pay 78,148

Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested will provide for the incremental basic compensation for mobilized officers and active military personnel that are above the baseline strength levels.

Part II - Justification of Funds Required The request provides the basic compensation for mobilized Reserve officers. The FY 2007 military pay raise reflects a 2.2 percent across-the-board pay raise effective January 1, 2007, with selective increases for certain warrant officers effective April 1, 2007. Detailed cost computations are provided in the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve Mobilization 1,193 $78,730 93,925 1,138 $68,671 78,148 Total 1,193 93,925 1,138 78,148

FY 2007 Net RequestReserve Mobilization 78,148 Total 78,148

FY 2007 EstimateFY 2006 Actual

12



Budget Line Item: Retired Pay Accrual 20,681

Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested provide for the Department of Defense's contribution to its Military Retirement Fund, in accordance with 10 U.S.C 1466. Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The budget estimates are derived as a product of: (a) The DoD Actuary approved full-time Normal Cost Percentages (NCP) is 26.5 percent of basic pay for FY 2007. (b) The total amount of the basic pay expected to be paid during the fiscal year. The funds provide the Retired Pay Accrual payments for mobilized Reserve officers. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve Mobilization 1,193 $20,696 24,690 1,138 $18,173 20,681 Total 1,193 24,690 1,138 20,681



13



Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) 20,374

Part I - Purpose and Scope

In the FY 1998 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress approved the payment of a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to Servicemembers. The Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) payment, formerly located in overseas station allowances, moved into this section due to a change in Section 603 of P.L. 105-85, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1998. The continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii BAH is termed BAH Domestic, while the overseas housing allowance is called BAH Overseas. Payment to Servicemembers is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 403. The BAH inflation rate for FY 2007 is 4.3 percent.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This program provides a cash allowance to those military personnel not provided with government quarters adequate for themselves and their dependents. This allowance enables such personnel to obtain civilian housing as a substitute. The funds provide the BAH allowance for mobilized Reserve officers. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve 1,193 $19,055 22,733 1,138 $17,903 20,374 Total 1,193 22,733 1,138 20,374


FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 Estimate

14



Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) 2,233


The funds requested will provide for subsistence allowance authorized by 37 U.S.C. 402 and P.L. 96-343.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested All officers, regardless of dependency status and pay grade, are paid a monthly Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) at the same statutory rate. The BAS inflation rate for FY 2007 is 2.8 percent. The funds provide the BAS allowance for mobilized Reserve officers. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve Mobilization 1,071 $2,239 2,398 978 $2,282 2,233 Total 1,071 2,398 978 2,233



15



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances 49,502

Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested provide for payments to officers for the following special pays.

Family Separation Allowance (FSA): Paid at the rate of $250 per month to members with dependents who are on duty away from home for a period of more than 30 continuous days (37 U.S.C. 427).

Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay (IDP): Paid at the rate of $225 per month to personnel subject to hostile fire or in an area in which they are in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire (37 U.S.C. 310).

Hardship Duty Pay (HDP): The monthly rate may not exceed $300 per month. The funds requested provide additional payment to personnel performing duty in a location that is designated by the Secretary of Defense as hardship duty (37 U.S.C. 305). Beginning in FY 2007, Hardship Duty pay contains payments for duty at Joint Task Force – Guantanamo Bay.

Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP): The monthly rate may not exceed $1,500 per month. The funds requested provide additional payment to personnel performing duty in assignments that is designated by the Secretary of Defense difficult to fill (37 U.S.C. 307a).

Foreign Language Proficiency Pay (FLPP): (37 U.S.C. 316) -a monthly payment made to qualified officers whose military specialty requires proficiency in a foreign language. The FY05 NDAA increased the monthly cap from $300 to $1,000 per month for members entitled to basic pay and a one-time bonus not to exceed $6,000 for Reserve component members who fulfill a 12 month certification period.

Parachute: (37 U.S.C. 301(a) (3)) - duty involving parachute jumping as an essential part of military duty. Payment is a flat $150 per month, except for duty involving High Altitude Low Opening (HALO) jumps which receive $225 per month.

Diving duty pay: (37 U.S.C. 304) - a monthly amount not to exceed $240 paid to officers on active duty assigned to diving duty. Recipients of diving duty pay are required to maintain proficiency as divers and must actually perform diving duty.

Sea pay: (37 U.S.C. 305a):

(a) Career sea pay (CSP) - a variable amount paid monthly that ranges from $50 to $700 to officers on active duty who are permanently or temporarily serving on a ship, the primary mission of which is accomplished while underway, or while serving as a member of the off crew of a two-crewed submarine; or when serving on a ship, the primary mission of which is accomplished while in port. CSP is earned only during a period that the ship is away from its homeport for 30 consecutive days or more. The

16

FY 2001 National Defense Authorization Act enhanced CSP which increases existing sea pay rates in order to restore incentive values of sea pay and expands CSP to officers with less than three years of sea duty if they are assigned to qualifying sea duty.

(b) Premium sea pay - $100 per month paid to officers who are entitled to CSP who have served more than 36 consecutive months on sea duty payable on the 37th consecutive month.

Demolition Duty: (37 U.S.C. 301(a)(4)) - duty involving the demolition of explosives as a primary duty including training for such duty. Payment is a flat $150 per month.

Medical / Dental Pays: Various special and incentive pays provided for in 37 U.S.C.

Separation Pay: Provides for separation payments for reserve component members who either sell back their unused leave or receive payments due to physical disability under 10 USC 1212.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The projected average number of personnel is based on the total spaces where each type of pay is authorized to meet force structure requirements. Funding requirements are based on the estimated number of officers eligible for each type of payment and rate of payment.

Summary cost computations are provided by the following tables:

17

Appropriation: Military Personnel, Navy

Budget Activity 1: Pay and Allowances of Officers

Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Mobilized ReserveTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 591 $3,000 1,772 968 $3,000 2,904 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 508 $2,700 1,371 871 $2,700 2,352 Hardship Duty Pay - $0 - 111 $1,800 200 Assignment Incentive Pay 41 $6,000 243 0 $0 - Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 2 $1,800 4 35 $3,600 126 Parachute 63 $2,606 163 66 $2,606 172 Dive 21 $2,292 48 24 $2,292 55 Career Sea Pay 83 $4,045 334 144 $2,499 360 Demolition 142 $1,800 255 205 $1,800 369 Medical/Dental Pay 122 $10,500 1,284 385 $12,500 4,813 Separation Pay 15 $13,414 196 2 $11,281 23 Total 5,670 11,373

FY 2007 Title IXForeign Language Proficiency Pay 126 Total 126

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 2,904 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 2,352 Hardship Duty Pay 200 Parachute 172 Dive 55 Career Sea Pay 360 Demolition 369 Medical/Dental Pay 4,813 Separation Pay 23 Total 11,247


18



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Active Component DeployedTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 1,676 $3,000 5,027 4,113 $3,000 12,338 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 3,506 $2,700 9,467 6,180 $2,700 16,686 Hardship Duty Pay - $0 - 804 $1,800 1,447 Assignment Incentive Pay 59 $6,000 351 216 $6,000 1,296 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 124 $1,532 190 2,861 $1,800 5,150 Parachute 100 $2,292 229 113 $2,292 259 Dive 107 $2,619 280 130 $2,619 340 Career Sea Pay $0 - $0 - Combat Related Injury Pay 22 $2,000 44 30 $2,000 60 Demolition 135 $1,800 243 142 $1,800 256 Total 15,831 37,832

FY 2007 Title IXForeign Language Proficiency Pay 5,150 Total 5,150

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 12,338 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 16,686 Hardship Duty Pay 1,447 Assignment Incentive Pay 1,296 Parachute 259 Dive 340 Career Sea Pay - Combat Related Injury Pay 60 Demolition 256 Total 32,682


19



Budget Line Item: Social Security Tax 5,966


The funds requested provide for employer's tax to the Social Security Administration as required by the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA).

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The FICA tax is developed by multiplying the total earnings for FICA tax purposes by the applicable percent. The Old Age, Survivor, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) rate is 6.2 percent and the Hospital Insurance (HI) rate is 1.45 percent. The maximum amounts of earnings per individual on which tax is payable are: Calendar year OASDI Base Medicare Base 2007 $96,600 No upper limit

The funds provide the employer’s Social Security Tax payment for mobilized Reserve officers. Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:




20


Budget Activity 2: Pay and Allowances of Enlisted ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Basic Pay 145,279 Part I - Purpose and Scope

The funds requested will provide for the incremental basic compensation and length of service pay increments for mobilized enlisted personnel and active military personnel that are above the baseline strength levels.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The funds provide the basic compensation for mobilized Reserve. The FY 2007 military pay raise reflects a 2.2 percent across-the-board pay raise effective January 1, 2007, with selective increases for certain mid-grade senior enlisted personnel effective April 1, 2007.

Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:




21





The funds requested provide for the Department of Defense's contribution to its Military Retirement Fund, in accordance with 10 U.S.C 1466. Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The budget estimates are derived as a product of: (a) The DoD Actuary approved full-time Normal Cost Percentages (NCP) is 26.5 percent of basic pay for FY 2007. (b) The total amount of the basic pay expected to be paid during the fiscal year. The funds provide the Retired Pay Accrual payments for mobilized Reserve enlisted personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:




22




In the FY 1998 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress approved the payment of a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to Servicemembers. The Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) payment, formerly located in overseas station allowances, moved into this section due to a change in Section 603 of P.L. 105-85, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1998. The continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii BAH is termed BAH Domestic, while the overseas housing allowance is called BAH Overseas. Payment to Servicemembers is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 403. The BAH inflation rate for FY 2007 is 4.3 percent.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This program provides a cash allowance to those military personnel not provided with government quarters adequate for themselves and their dependents. This allowance enables such personnel to obtain civilian housing as a substitute. The funds provide the BAH allowance for mobilized Reserve enlisted personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:




23





The funds requested provide for payments to enlisted personnel for the following special pays:

Family Separation Allowance: Paid at the rate of $250 per month to members with dependents who are on duty away from home for a period of more than 30 continuous days (37 U.S.C. 427).

Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay: Paid at the rate of $225 per month to personnel subject to hostile fire or in an area in which they are in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire (37 U.S.C. 310).

Hardship Duty Pay: The monthly rate may not exceed $300 per month. The funds requested provide additional payment to enlisted personnel performing duty in a location that is designated by The Secretary of Defense as hardship duty (37 U.S.C. 305). Beginning in FY 2007, Hardship Duty pay contains payments for duty at Joint Task Force - Guantanamo Bay.


Foreign Language Proficiency Pay(FLPP): (37 U.S.C. 316) -a monthly payment made to qualified officers whose military specialty requires proficiency in a foreign language. The FY05 NDAA increased the monthly cap from $300 to $1,000 per month for members entitled to basic pay and a one-time bonus not to exceed $6,000 for Reserve component members who fulfill a 12 month certification period.

Parachute: (37 U.S.C. 301(a) (3)) - duty involving parachute jumping as an essential part of military duty. Payment is a flat $150 per month, except for duty involving High Altitude Low Opening (HALO) jumps which receive $225 per month.

Diving duty pay: (37 U.S.C. 304) - a monthly amount not to exceed $240 paid to officers on active duty assigned to diving duty. Recipients of diving duty pay are required to maintain proficiency as divers and must actually perform diving duty.

Sea pay: (37 U.S.C. 305a) :

(a) Career sea pay (CSP) - a variable amount paid monthly that ranges from $50 to $700 to officers on active duty who are permanently or temporarily serving on a ship, the primary mission of which is accomplished while underway, or while serving as a member of the off crew of a two-crewed submarine; or when serving on a ship, the primary mission of which is accomplished while in port. CSP is earned only during a period that the ship is away from its homeport for 30 consecutive days

24

or more. The FY 2001 National Defense Authorization Act enhanced CSP which increases existing sea pay rates in order to restore incentive values of sea pay and expands CSP to officers with less than three years of sea duty if they are assigned to qualifying sea duty.

(b) Premium sea pay - $100 per month paid to officers who are entitled to CSP who have served more than 36 consecutive months on sea duty payable on the 37th consecutive month.

Demolition Duty: (37 U.S.C. 301(a)(4)) - duty involving the demolition of explosives as a primary duty including training for such duty. Payment is a flat $150 per month.

Separation Pay: Provides for separation payments for reserve component members who either sell back their unused leave or receive payments due to physical disability under 10 USC 1212.



25


Budget Activity 2: Pay and Allowances of Enlisted

Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Mobilized ReserveTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 2,213 $3,000 6,639 3,311 $3,000 9,933 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 2,688 $2,700 7,258 3,544 $2,700 9,569 Hardship Duty Pay - $0 - 1,188 $1,800 2,138 Assignment Incentive Pay - - - 0 $0 - Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 40 $3,600 144 396 $3,600 1,426 Parachute 27 $2,211 60 144 $2,619 377 Dive 40 $2,225 89 146 $2,225 325 Career Sea Pay 160 $4,045 647 890 $4,045 3,600 Demolition 30 $1,800 54 330 $1,800 594 Separation Pay 65 $2,110 137 68 $2,219 151 Total 15,027 28,113


FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 9,933 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 9,569 Hardship Duty Pay 2,138 Parachute 377 Dive 325 Career Sea Pay 3,600 Demolition 594 Separation Pay 151 Total 26,687


26



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Active Component DeployedTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 4,257 $3,000 12,771 10,637 $3,000 31,911 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 23,209 $2,700 62,664 29,196 $2,700 78,829 Hardship Duty Pay - $0 - 2,036 $1,800 3,665 Assignment Incentive Pay 400 $6,000 2,400 651 $6,000 3,906 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 18 $3,600 65 6,137 $3,600 22,094 Career Sea Pay 60 $4,045 243 1,542 $4,045 6,237 Parachute 11 $2,211 24 114 $2,292 261 Dive 17 $2,225 38 73 $2,619 190 Demolition 19 $1,800 34 362 $1,800 652 Combat Related Injury Pay 50 $2,000 100 51 $2,000 102 Total 78,339 147,847


FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 31,911 Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay 78,829 Hardship Duty Pay 3,665 Assignment Incentive Pay 3,906 Career Sea Pay 6,237 Parachute 261 Dive 190 Demolition 652 Combat Related Injury Pay 102 Total 125,753


27



Budget Line Item: Social Security Tax 11,110 Part I - Purpose and Scope



The funds provide the employer’s Social Security Tax payment for mobilized Reserve enlisted personnel. Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:




28


Budget Activity 4: Subsistence of Enlisted Personnel ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Subsistence/Subsistence-in-Kind 27,252


The funds requested for this budget activity are for the payment of authorized Basic Allowances for Subsistence (BAS) and Subsistence-in-Kind (SIK). Subsistence-in-Kind includes the cost of procuring subsistence for garrison dining facilities (Subsistence in Messes), operational rations, and augmentation rations. The Navy provides subsistence at Camp Lemonier, Djibouti. The Marine Corps transferred management of Camp Lemonier, Djibouti to the Navy as of October 1, 2006. The funds requested will finance subsistence of personnel stationed there. Basic Allowance for Subsistence is linked to the Department of Agriculture (DoA) food plan indices. All enlisted members (except recruits and holdees) are entitled to BAS. Members continue to receive BAS while deployed. Subsistence-in-Messes is the cost of bulk subsistence for dining facilities operated in support of OIF and OEF. This requirement is dependent on the number of personnel using the dining facilities and the cost of food. This is an additional cost above the BAS since members are authorized to continue receiving their BAS even though food is provided in theater. Operational Rations are rations used for field subsistence. Operational rations include the Meal-Ready-to Eat (MRE), Unitized Group Rations (UGR) that include “heat and serve” and A-ration varieties, and other operational rations, such as Cold Weather Rations. The SIK funds the cost of operational rations for both officers and enlisted soldiers. The number of active duty personnel and the type of operational rations served determine costs for operational rations.

29


Budget Activity 4: Subsistence of Enlisted Personnel

Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Subsistence/Subsistence-in-Kind

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This budget activity includes the Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) paid to the mobilized enlisted soldier. The BAS is paid under the following conditions: (1) when authorized to mess separately, (2) while on authorized leave, and (3) when subsistence-in-kind is not available. All mobilized soldiers are paid their full BAS entitlement. Funds provide for incremental subsistence costs for personnel supporting OEF/OIF. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table: Enlisted Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS)Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve Mobilization 645 $3,252 2,098 4,256 $3,314 14,103 Total 645 2,098 4,256 14,103

FY 2007 Net RequestReserve Mobilization 14,103


30




Subsistence-In-Kind (SIK) Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountSubsistence in Messes - $0 - 12,540 $1,049 13,149 Total - 13,149

FY 2007 Net RequestSubsistence in Messes 13,149 Total 13,149

Total Subsistence of Enlisted Personnel 13,149


31

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION

32


Budget Activity 5: Permanent Change of Station (PCS) ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Permanent Change of Station (PCS) 34,500

Part I – Purpose and Scope

The Permanent Change of Station (PCS) program pays for travel, transportation, storage, and dislocation allowances for reassignment of military members and their families traveling individually or as part of an organized unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Costs are for the dislocation allowance, shipment of household goods, temporary and non-temporary storage of household goods, temporary lodging expense, and member mileage and per diem.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested FY 2007 President’s Budget base budget does not include funding to ensure the Navy distributes the correct grade and skill mix for Sailors deploying in support of the Global War on Terrorism. Accession moves are necessary to ensure the Navy meets increase in strength requirements and distributes the correct grade and skill mix for Sailors deploying in support of GWOT. There are also increased costs for moves to support transition teams and deploying personnel to Iraq and Afghanistan. These moves fully man deploying units to authorized strength levels and provide military advisors to the Iraqi and Afghanistan governments. Additional moves are also required to reset the forces in support of deploying units for OIF and OEF, moves for Sailors retained due to specialized skills, and Sailors separating after returning from deployment. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

33


Budget Activity 5: Permanent Change of Station (PCS)

Budget Line Item: Permanent Change of Station (PCS)

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountAccession Moves 1,355 $1,187 1,608 6,166 $1,283 7,911 Operational Moves 776 $9,870 7,659 1,636 $9,743 15,936 Rotational Moves 577 $8,345 4,815 527 $8,419 4,437 Separation Moves 1,251 $1,285 1,608 4,747 $1,309 6,216 Total 3,959 15,690 13,076 34,500

FY 2007 Net RequestAccession Moves 7,911 Operational Moves 15,936 Rotational Moves 4,437 Separation Moves 6,216 Total 34,500


34

CASUALTY AND DISABILITY BENEFITS

35


Budget Activity 6: Other Military Personnel Costs ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Casualty and Disability Benefits 132,130

Part I – Purpose and Scope The Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program is a low cost group life insurance for Servicemembers on active duty. These payments are required, under section 1969(b) of title 38, United States Code, when actual mortality rates exceed peacetime mortality rates. The T-SGLI is a new program that provides automatic traumatic injury coverage to all Servicemembers covered under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program. Every member who has SGLI also has T-SGLI, effective December 1, 2005. Funding for death gratuity payments is for payments to survivors of members dying on active duty. The amount payable was increased from $12,000 to $100,000 in Section 664 of the FY 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. Funding is for SGLI/T-SGI insurance premiums that the Department of Defense pays on behalf of Servicemembers

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested The funds are required to make extra hazard payment to the Department of Veterans Affairs to finance the increased number of SGLI death claims for the remaining portion of policy year 2006, which is not on a fiscal year (policy year based on July 1 – June 30), and a portion of policy year 2007. The estimated average claim in policy year 2006 was $352,822 and the estimated average claim in policy year 2007 is $396,000. Funds are also required to make benefit payments to military personnel who incur a traumatic injury in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The amount needed for non-combat related death gratuities is due to the increase from $12,000 to $100,000 in Section 664 of the FY 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. This entitlement was authorized after the FY 2007 budget was completed for submission to the Congress. Section 606 of the FY 2007 National Defense Authorization Act directs the Department to pay the full premium for coverage under Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program during service in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) or Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The amount the Department pays is $29.00 per month for each member.

36


Budget Activity 6: Other Military Personnel Costs

Budget Line Item: Casualty and Disability Benefits

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountSGLI - $0 82,880 - $0 100,300 T-SGLI - $0 13,950 - $0 2,325 SGLI/T-SGLI Insurance Premium 14,872 $141 2,097 19,049 $348 6,629 Death Gratuity (Combat Deaths) 12 $100,000 1,200 15 $100,000 1,500 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) 936 $238,000 222,772 243 $88,000 21,376 Total 322,899 132,130

FY 2007 Title IXSGLI 100,300 T-SGLI 2,325 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) 11,875 Total 114,500

FY 2007 Net RequestSGLI - T-SGLI - SGLI/T-SGLI Insurance Premium 6,629 Death Gratuity (Combat Deaths) 1,500 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) 9,501 Total 17,630


37

ADDITIONAL MOBILIZATION/DEPLOYMENT COSTS

38



Budget Line Item: Additional Mobilization/Deployment Costs 31,200

Part I – Purpose and Scope Unemployment benefits are for payments to ex-Servicemembers who are discharged or released under honorable conditions as prescribed in paragraph (1) of section 8521(a) of Title 5, United States Code as amended by Section 301, PL. 102-164. The Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP), authorized in the FY 2006 NDAA, authorized the payment to members of the reserves who are involuntarily mobilized and experiencing a monthly active duty income differential as a result of extended or frequent mobilizations.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested Eligibility for unemployment benefits is defined as active service in the armed forces where upon an individual was discharged under honorable conditions and had completed their first full term of active service; or was discharged before completing their first term under an early release program, because of hardship, for medical reasons, or for personality disorders, or ineptitude (but only if the service was continuous for 365 days or more). These increased costs are primarily the result of Reserve Component mobilization. Payment for RIRP is up to $3,000 per month.

39



Budget Line Item: Additional Mobilization/Deployment Costs

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountUnemployment Benefits - $0 62,440 - $0 28,200 Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP) 1,000 $3,000 3,000 1,000 $3,000 3,000 Total 65,440 31,200

FY 2007 Net RequestUnemployment Benefits 28,200 Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP) 3,000 Total 31,200


40

RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND

SUPPORT

41

Appropriation: Reserve Personnel, Navy FY 2007

Budget Activity 1: Reserve Component Training and Support ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Pay Group A Training 35,000


The funds requested will provide for the pay and allowances for Navy Reservists performing Inactive Duty Training (IDT) drills in support of Navy commands conducting GWOT mission-related operations (Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)).

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The funds requested will allow the Navy Reserve to provide critical operational support to the Fleet in the form of IDT drills. They will also provide Reservists to execute additional flight hours required for Fleet Logistics Support (VR) squadrons and additional drill authority for operational units, including Construction Battalions (Seabees) and Expeditionary Logistics Support Force (ELSF) commands.

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountIDT for Additional Drills Authority 85,754 $408 35,008 83,128 $421 35,000 Total 85,754 35,008 83,128 35,000

FY 2007 Net RequestIDT for Additional Drills Authority 35,000 Total 35,000


42


Budget Line Item: Special Training ($ in Thousands)

24,800 Part I - Purpose and Scope

The funds requested will provide for the pay and allowances for Navy Reservists performing Active Duty for Training in support of Navy commands conducting GWOT mission-related operations (Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)).

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested One part of the requested Active Duty for Training (ADT) funding will support increased usage of the Naval Special Warfare (NSW) Reserve Force to augment and support Active Component Special Operations Forces (SOF) performing GWOT missions. A maximum of 12 months of pre-deployment training will be required prior to deploying. NSW Reserve Forces may deploy and remain OCONUS approximately 180 days. The second part of the requested ADT funding will provide Navy Reserve operational support directly to Navy commands conducting OEF and OIF, respectively. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountActive Duty for Training (SOF Op. Spt. OIF/OEF) - $0 - 7,123 $360 2,562 Active Duty for Training (SOF Op Spt. OEF) 24,860 $349 8,690 17,808 $360 6,404 Active Duty for Training (SOF Op Spt. OIF) 26,069 $349 9,102 38,160 $360 13,723 Administration and Support/ADSW 13,344 $2,520 33,630 - $0 - ADT/ADSW/A&S BAH 5,572 2,111 Total 56,994 63,091 24,800

FY 2007 Net RequestActive Duty for Training (SOF Op. Spt. OIF/OEF) 2,562 Active Duty for Training (SOF Op Spt. OEF) 6,404 Active Duty for Training (SOF Op Spt. OIF) 13,723 ADT/ADSW/A&S BAH 2,111 Total 24,800


43


Budget Line Item: School Training ($ in Thousands)

13,000

Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested will provide Active Duty for Training periods for Navy Reserve enlisted personnel attending service and other professional schools for training and professional development in their respective ratings. Their attendance is associated with the Recruiting Selective Conversion Reenlistment – Reserve (RESCORE-R) program which offers reenlistment incentives to enlisted members who reenlist and agree to convert their rating to one needed in the Force to meet GWOT-related mission area requirements.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested

The budget estimates are derived from the estimated number of school attendees multiplied by the expected cost per student per school. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountActive Duty for Training 941 $11,829 11,140 975 $12,267 11,960 Active Duty for Training (Schools) - BAH 370 1,040 Total 941 11,510 975 13,000

FY 2007 Net RequestActive Duty for Training 11,960 Active Duty for Training (Schools) - BAH 1,040 Total 13,000


1


FY 2007 Supplemental Request

FOR

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) AND

OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF)

MARINE CORPS MILITARY PERSONNEL

February 2007

MILITARY PERSONNEL TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 M-1 Detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 ACTIVE MARINE CORPS MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS Reserve & Guard Mobilization/Deployment and Active Overstrength Costs Basic Pay, Officer.................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Retired Pay Accrual, Officer ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Basic Allowance for Housing, Officer ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Basic Allowance for Subsistence, Officer.............................................................................................................................................. 14 Incentive Pays, Officer............................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Special Pays, Officer ............................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Allowances, Officer ................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Social Security Tax, Officer ................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Basic Pay, Enlisted.................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Retired Pay Accrual, Enlisted................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Basic Allowance for Housing, Enlisted ................................................................................................................................................. 21 Incentive Pays, Enlisted.......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Special Pays, Enlisted ............................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Allowances, Enlisted ............................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Separation Pay, Enlisted ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Recruiting and Retention, Enlisted ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 Social Security Tax, Enlisted ................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Basic Allowance for Subsistence, Enlisted............................................................................................................................................ 28 Subsistence-in-Kind, Officer and Enlisted ........................................................................................................................................... 29 Permanent Change of Station Travel Accession Travel...................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Operational Travel.................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Rotational Travel .................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Separation Travel.................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

3

Casualty and Disability Benefits Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI)................................................................................................................................... 35 Traumatic Injury Protection Coverage (T-SGLI) ............................................................................................................................... 35 Death Gratuities ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Additional Mobilization/Deployment Costs Unemployment Compensation............................................................................................................................................................... 38

4

MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW The FY 2007 Supplemental requests funds so that the United States may continue its security stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and the global fight against terrorism. These deployments are in addition to the daily military operations around the globe. Without additional funds in FY 2007, the Marine Corps would have to use funds from their readiness and investment accounts to finance the continuing costs of military operations. In FY 2007, Marine Corps military personnel costs are averaging about $116 million per month for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and $13 million per month for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Absorbing costs of this magnitude would seriously degrade combat operations and would weaken the nation’s ability to react to future threats. This request includes $1,387 million for Marine Corps military personnel costs in addition to the $161 million provided in Title IX as shown in the following tables:


Summary by AppropriationMilitary Personnel, Marine Corps 1,295,872 145,576 1,386,871 1,532,447 Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps 10,627 15,420 - 15,420

1,306,499 160,996 1,386,871 1,547,867

Basic Allowance for Housing FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007Memo Entry - Cost included above Total Actual Title IX Supplemental Total EstimateMilitary Personnel, Marine Corps (154,264) - (196,496) (196,496) Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (321) - - -

(154,585) - (196,496) (196,496)

($ in Thousands)

($ in Thousands)

5

Active Marine CorpsMarine Corps Reserve Total

Request by Category (Net Request)Reserve & Guard Mobilization/Deployment Costs 605,855 - 605,855 Active Overstrength 459,319 - 459,319 Subsistence-In-Kind (SIK) - - Recruiting and Retention 213,801 - 213,801 Permanent Change of Station 47,169 - 47,169 Casualty and Disability 60,727 - 60,727 Pre and Post Mobilization Training - - - Total Military Personnel 1,386,871 - 1,386,871

FY 2007($ in Thousands)

The following table reflects mobilization and deployment assumptions as well as active overstrength estimates. Mobilization numbers include personnel deployed to theater as well as personnel remaining in CONUS supporting OEF and OIF. The overstrength end strength level is 9,000 in FY 2007.

Average StrengthFY 2007

Active Marine Corps Deployment 23,867Marine Corps Reserve Mobilization 6,927Active Marine Corps Overstrength 7,194

In response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the President invoked his authority (10 U.S.C 12302) to order to active duty Ready Reserve members and delegated his authority to the Secretary of Defense in Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001. This declaration of national emergency has been extended, thereby continuing the authority to order to active duty Ready Reserve members. In order to sustain current military operations, funding is requested to finance the incremental costs (i.e., pay, allowances, subsistence, and other personnel costs) for personnel mobilized for duty in support of OIF and OEF. The Marine Corps’s military personnel requirement of $1,386.9 million is comprised of the following major costs:

6

Reserve & Guard Mobilization/Deployment Costs ($605.9 million)

• Basic military pay and entitlements (e.g., Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), retired pay accrual and social security contributions, incentive pays, etc.) for Reserve and National Guard members on active duty to provide essential military operation support or backfill for those active personnel deployed overseas in support of OIF and OEF.

• Special Pays for Mobilized Reserve and National Guard Personnel: • Imminent Danger Pay (IDP) ($225 per month), • Family Separation Allowance (FSA) ($250 per month), • Hardship Duty-location Pay ($100 per month if deployed for less than 12 months and $300 per month if deployed for more

than 12 months),

• Subsistence for all Active and Reserve Component members in support of OIF and OEF.

• Additional Mobilization/Deployment Benefits for unemployment benefits to ex-service members who are discharged or released under honorable conditions; the Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP); and Interest on Uniformed Services Savings Deposits payments authorized by Section 1035 of 10 U.S.C

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: Insufficient funding for mobilized Reserve Marines will hinder the ability of the Marine to accomplish GWOT related missions. Reserve Marines are a critical component of the Marine Corps total force, accounting for or enabling the deployment of approximately 1/3 of current Marines in the CENTCOM theater of operations.

Active Overstrength Costs ($459.3 million)

• Personnel-related costs for an additional Marine Corps military personnel maintained on active duty above the normal strength levels of 175,000 to sustain the readiness levels of deploying units. The Marine Corps anticipates ending FY 2007 with end strength of 184,000.

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: Incomplete funding of Marine Corps overstrength requirements will reduce the ability of the force to meet established deployment tempo goals of one term deployment to two terms non-deployment. The Marine Corps would be forced into a choice between diverting funds from other critical initiatives to fund end strength or reduce Marine Corps end strength, possibly exposing strains in the current force.

7

Permanent Change of Station ($47.2 million)

• The Permanent Change of Station (PCS) program pays for travel, transportation, storage, and dislocation allowances for reassignment of military members and their families traveling individually or as part of an organized unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Costs are for the dislocation allowance, shipment of household goods, temporary and non-temporary storage of household goods, temporary lodging expense, and member mileage and per diem.

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: The Marine Corps would be forced into a choice between diverting funds from other critical initiatives to fund end strength or reduce Marine Corps end strength, possibly exposing strains in the current force.

Recruiting and Retention ($213.8 million)

• The Recruiting and Retention program pays for personnel incentives, bonuses, education benefits and retention bonuses. Payments are used as accession and retention incentives to fill critical Marine Corps Military Operational Skill (MOS) positions.

IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: The Marine Corps will take serious risk towards achieving its planned accession and retention goals. This situation will make it difficult for the Marine Corps to meet its end strength IAW the NDAA and change its force structure IAW the modularity plan. Failing to fund any portion of the plan will seriously impact Marine Corps end strength objectives to meet contingency mission requirements.

Casualty and Disability Benefits ($60.7 million)

• Casualty Benefits – $60.7 million for the following benefits associated with the death or traumatic injury of service members.

• Funding is for SGLI/T-SGLI insurance premiums that the Department of Defense pays on behalf of service members ($9.1 million).

• Death Gratuity payments to survivors of members dying on active duty ($31.1 million)

• Increase Unemployment insurance premium requirements ($20.5 million) IMPACT IF NOT FUNDED: Casualty and disability benefits, being statutory entitlements, are requirements the Marine Corps simply must meet. The Marine Corps would be forced into a choice between diverting funds from other critical initiatives to fund end strength or reduce Marine Corps end strength, possibly exposing strains in the current force.

8


MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPSBUDGET ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERSBASIC PAY 106,338 - 185,119 185,119 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 28,179 - 49,056 49,056 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 36,851 - 63,337 63,337 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 3,336 - 5,839 5,839 SPECIAL PAYS 26,636 560 27,331 27,891 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 8,135 - 14,162 14,162 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 209,475 560 344,844 345,404

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTEDBASIC PAY 271,449 65,688 241,654 307,342 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 71,894 17,407 64,039 81,446 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 117,413 - 133,159 133,159 SPECIAL PAYS 202,476 2,696 438,169 440,865 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 20,760 5,025 18,487 23,512 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 683,991 90,816 895,507 986,323

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNELBASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 29,815 - 38,624 38,624 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 37,201 - - - TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 67,016 - 38,624 38,624

BUDGET ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVELACCESSION TRAVEL - - 4,131 4,131 TRAINING TRAVEL - - - - OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 22,298 - 43,038 43,038 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL - - - - SEPARATION TRAVEL - - - - TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS - - - - TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 22,298 - 47,169 47,169

($ in Thousands)

9


BUDGET ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTSINTEREST ON SOLDIERS DEPOSITS - - - - RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - - - - UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 20,502 - 20,500 20,500 DEATH GRATUITIES 139,630 5,603 31,121 36,724 SGLI/TSGLI INSURANCE PREMIUM 2,760 - 9,106 9,106 SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 39,240 47,500 - 47,500 TRAUMATIC INJURY PROTECTION COVERAGE (T-SGLI) 110,960 1,097 - 1,097 TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 313,092 54,200 60,727 114,927

TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 1,295,872 145,576 1,386,871 1,532,447


RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPSBUDGET ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT - - - - SPECIAL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) 10,306 - - - SPECIAL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) (BAH) 321 - - - SCHOOL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) - 15,420 - 15,420 SCHOOL TRAINING (PRE/POST MOB TRAINING) (BAH) - - - - RERUITING AND RETENTION - - - - DISABILITY AND DEATH GRATUITY - - - - OTHER PROGRAMS - - - - TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 10,627 15,420 - 15,420

GRAND TOTAL MARINE CORPS MILITARY PERSONNEL 1,306,499 160,996 1,386,871 1,547,867

($ in Thousands)

($ in Thousands)

10

RESERVE & GUARD MOBILIZATION ACTIVE DEPLOYMENT

ACTIVE OVERSTRENGTH

11

Appropriation: Military Personnel, Marine Corps FY 2007


Budget Line Item: Basic Pay 185,119

Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested will provide for the incremental basic compensation for mobilized officers and active military personnel that are above the baseline strength levels.

Part II - Justification of Funds Required The request provides the basic compensation for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active officer personnel. In FY 2007, the overstrength officer end strength is 1,620, and the average strength is 1,295. The FY 2007 military pay raise reflects a 2.2 percent across-the-board pay raise effective January 1, 2007, with selective increases for certain warrant officers effective April 1, 2007. Detailed cost computations are provided in the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve/Guard Mobilization 1,095 $70,703 77,420 1,247 $72,824 90,812 Active Component Overstrength 409 $70,703 28,919 1,295 $72,824 94,307 Total 1,504 106,338 2,542 185,119

FY 2007 Title IXReserve/Guard MobilizationActive Component Overstrength - Total -

- FY 2007 Net RequestReserve/Guard Mobilization 90,812 Active Component Overstrength 94,307 Total 185,119


12




Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested provide for the Department of Defense's contribution to its Military Retirement Fund, in accordance with 10 U.S.C 1466.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The budget estimates are derived as a product of: (a) The DoD Actuary approved part-time and full-time Normal Cost Percentages (NCP) (26.5 percent of basic pay for FY 2007) and (b) The total amount of the basic pay expected to be paid during the fiscal year. The funds provide the Retired Pay Accrual payments for mobilized Reserve and Guard officer personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve/Guard Mobilization 1,095 $18,736 20,516 1,247 $19,298 24,065 Active Component Overstrength 409 $18,736 7,663 1,295 $19,298 24,991 Total 1,504 28,179 2,542 49,056

FY 2007 Title IXReserve/Guard Mobilization - Active Component Overstrength - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestReserve/Guard Mobilization 24,065 Active Component Overstrength 24,991 Total 49,056


13





In the FY 1998 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress approved the payment of a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to service members. The Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) payment, formerly located in overseas station allowances, moved into this section due to a change in Section 603 of P.L. 105-85, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1998. The continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii BAH is termed BAH Domestic, while the overseas housing allowance is called BAH Overseas. Payment to service members is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 403. The BAH inflation rate for FY 2007 is 4.7 percent.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This program provides a cash allowance to those military personnel not provided with government quarters adequate for themselves and their dependents. This allowance enables such personnel to obtain civilian housing as a substitute. The funds provide the BAH allowance for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active officer personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve/Guard Mobilization 1,095 $24,502 26,830 1,247 $24,916 31,071 Active Component Overstrength 409 $24,502 10,021 1,295 $24,916 32,267 Total 1,504 36,851 2,542 63,337




14



Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) 5,839


The funds requested will provide for subsistence allowance authorized by 37 U.S.C. 402 and P.L. 96-343.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested All officers, regardless of dependency status and pay grade, are paid a monthly Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) at the same statutory rate. The BAS inflation rate for FY 2007 is 2.8 percent. The funds provide the BAS allowance for mobilized Reserve and Guard officers and overstrength active personnel. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountTotalReserve/Guard Mobilization 1,095 $2,218 2,429 1,247 $2,297 2,865 Active Component Overstrength 409 $2,218 907 1,295 $2,297 2,975 Total 1,504 3,336 2,542 5,839




15




Part I - Purpose and Scope The funds requested provide for payments to officers for the following special pays.

Family Separation Allowance (FSA): Paid at the rate of $250 per month to members with dependents who are on duty away from home for a period of more than 30 continuous days (37 U.S.C. 427).

Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay (IDP): Paid at the rate of $225 per month to personnel subject to hostile fire or in an area in which they are in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire (37 U.S.C. 310).

Hardship Duty Pay (HDP): The monthly rate may not exceed $300 per month. The funds requested provide additional payment to personnel performing duty in a location that is designated by the Secretary of Defense as hardship duty (37 U.S.C. 305).


Overseas Station Allowance (OSA): The funds requested will help to defray the excess costs of food, lodging, and related incidental expenses experienced by officers and their dependents on permanent duty outside the contiguous United States as prescribed by Joint Federal Travel Regulations and authorized under the provisions of Title 37 United States Code 405.

CONUS Cost of Living Allowance (CONUS COLA): As part of the DOD QOL actions, the funds requested will provide for payment of a Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) to members of the Uniformed Services who are assigned to high cost areas in the Continental United States (CONUS). A high cost area is defined as a locality where the cost of living exceeds the average cost of living in CONUS by an established threshold percentage during a base period. The threshold (108% of National Cost of Living Average) percentage is established by the Secretary of Defense and cannot be less than eight percent. The amount of COLA payable is the product of spendable income (based on regular military compensation) times the difference between the COLA index for the individual's high cost area and the threshold percentage. This allowance was authorized by the FY 1995 DOD Authorization Act.

Uniform Allowances: The funds requested will provide initial and additional uniform allowances to eligible officers upon entering the service to purchase required uniforms as authorized in United States Code Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services, Chapter 7, Allowances.

16

Appropriation: Military Personnel, Marine Corps


Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances



Mobilized Guard & ReserveTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 515 $3,000 1,545 586 $3,000 1,758 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 1,095 $2,700 2,957 1,247 $2,700 3,367 Hardship Duty Pay 1,095 $1,200 1,314 1,247 $1,200 1,496 Total 5,816 6,622

FY 2007 Title IXFamily Separation Allowance - Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay - Hardship Duty Pay - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 1,758 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 3,367 Hardship Duty Pay 1,496 Total 6,622


17



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Active Component DeployedTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 2,074 $3,000 6,222 1,833 $3,000 5,499 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 3,743 $2,700 10,106 3,900 $2,700 10,530 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 187 $3,000 560 Hardship Duty Pay 3,744 $1,200 4,492 3,900 $1,200 4,680 Total 20,821 21,269

FY 2007 Title IXFamily Separation Allowance - Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay - Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 560 Hardship Duty Pay - Total 560

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 5,499 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 10,530 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay - Hardship Duty Pay 4,680 Total 20,709


18







The funds provide the employer’s Social Security Tax payment for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active officer personnel. Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve/Guard Mobilization 1,095 $5,409 5,923 1,247 $5,571 6,947 Active Component Overstrength 409 $5,409 2,212 1,295 $5,571 7,215 Total 1,504 8,135 2,542 14,162




19



Budget Line Item: Basic Pay 241,654 Part I - Purpose and Scope

The funds requested will provide for the incremental basic compensation and length of service pay increments for mobilized enlisted personnel and active military personnel that are above the baseline strength levels.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The funds provide the basic compensation for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active enlisted personnel. In FY 2007, the overstrength enlisted end strength is 7,380, and the average strength is 5,899. The FY 2007 military pay raise reflects a 2.2 percent across-the-board pay raise effective January 1, 2007, with selective increases for certain mid-grade senior enlisted personnel effective April 1, 2007.

Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve/Guard Mobilization 5,750 $25,720 147,890 5,680 $26,543 150,764 Active Component Overstrength 4,804 $25,720 123,559 5,899 $26,543 156,577 Total 10,554 271,449 11,579 307,342

FY 2007 Title IXReserve/Guard Mobilization 65,688 Active Component Overstrength - Total 65,688



20





The funds requested provide for the Department of Defense's contribution to its Military Retirement Fund, in accordance with 10 U.S.C 1466.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The budget estimates are derived as a product of: (a) The DoD Actuary approved part-time and full-time Normal Cost Percentages (NCP) (26.5 percent of basic pay for FY 2007) and (b) The total amount of the basic pay expected to be paid during the fiscal year. The funds provide the Retired Pay Accrual payments for mobilized Reserve and Guard enlisted personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:


FY 2007 Title IXReserve/Guard Mobilization 17,407 Active Component OverstrengthTotal 17,407



21




In the FY 1998 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress approved the payment of a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to service members. The Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) payment, formerly located in overseas station allowances, moved into this section due to a change in Section 603 of P.L. 105-85, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1998. The continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii BAH is termed BAH Domestic, while the overseas housing allowance is called BAH Overseas. Payment to service members is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 403. The BAH inflation rate for FY 2007 is 4.7 percent.

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This program provides a cash allowance to those military personnel not provided with government quarters adequate for themselves and their dependents. This allowance enables such personnel to obtain civilian housing as a substitute. The funds provide the BAH allowance for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active enlisted personnel. The summary cost computations are provided in the following table:





22





The funds requested provide for payments to enlisted personnel for the following special pays until the supplemental is passed in FY 2007:

Family Separation Allowance: Paid at the rate of $250 per month to members with dependents who are on duty away from home for a period of more than 30 continuous days (37 U.S.C. 427).

Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay: Paid at the rate of $225 per month to personnel subject to hostile fire or in an area in which they are in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire (37 U.S.C. 310).

Hardship Duty Pay: The monthly rate may not exceed $300 per month. The funds requested provide additional payment to enlisted personnel performing duty in a location that is designated by The Secretary of Defense as hardship duty (37 U.S.C. 305).


Overseas Station Allowance (OSA): The funds requested will help to defray the excess costs of food, lodging, and related incidental expenses experienced by officers and their dependents on permanent duty outside the contiguous United States as prescribed by Joint Federal Travel Regulations and authorized under the provisions of Title 37 United States Code 405.

CONUS Cost of Living Allowance (CONUS COLA): As part of the DOD QOL actions, the funds requested will provide for payment of a Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) to members of the Uniformed Services who are assigned to high cost areas in the Continental United States (CONUS). A high cost area is defined as a locality where the cost of living exceeds the average cost of living in CONUS by an established threshold percentage during a base period. The threshold (108% of National Cost of Living Average) percentage is established by the Secretary of Defense and cannot be less than eight percent. The amount of COLA payable is the product of spendable income (based on regular military compensation) times the difference between the COLA index for the individual's high cost area and the threshold percentage. This allowance was authorized by the FY 1995 DOD Authorization Act.

Uniform Allowances: The funds requested will provide initial and additional uniform allowances to eligible officers upon entering the service to purchase required uniforms as authorized in United States Code Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services, Chapter 7, Allowances.

23



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances

Part II - Justification of Funds Requested The projected average number of personnel is based on the total spaces where each type of pay is authorized to meet force structure requirements. Funding requirements are based on the estimated number of enlisted personnel eligible for each type of payment and rate of payment.


Mobilized Guard & ReserveTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 994 $3,000 2,982 994 $3,000 2,982 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 1,380 $2,700 3,726 1,380 $2,700 3,726 Hardship Duty Pay 1,380 $1,200 1,656 1,380 $1,200 1,656 Separation Pay 5,750 $388 2,231 - $0 - Total 10,595 8,364

FY 2007 Title IXFamily Separation Allowance - Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay - Hardship Duty Pay - Separation Pay - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 2,982 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 3,726 Hardship Duty Pay 1,656 Separation Pay - Total 8,364


24



Budget Line Item: Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances Active Component DeployedTotal Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountFamily Separation Allowance 13,243 $3,000 39,729 12,165 $3,000 36,496 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 28,975 $2,700 78,233 25,884 $2,700 69,885 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay - $0 - 2,253 $3,000 6,758 Hardship Duty Pay 28,975 $1,200 34,770 25,884 $1,200 31,061 Assignment Incentive Pay 2,005 $1,445 2,897 8,976 $8,300 74,500 Separation Pay 4,804 $388 1,864 - $0 - Total 157,493 218,700

FY 2007 Title IXFamily Separation Allowance - Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay - Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 2,696 Hardship Duty Pay - Assignment Incentive Pay - Separation Pay - Total 2,696

FY 2007 Net RequestFamily Separation Allowance 36,496 Hostile Fire Pay/Imminent Danger Pay 69,885 Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 4,062 Hardship Duty Pay 31,061 Assignment Incentive Pay 74,500 Separation Pay - Total 216,004

Total Special and Incentive Pays and Allowances (Reserve Component Mobilization & Active Component Dep 224,368


25



Budget Line Item: Recruiting and Retention 213,801


Funding will cover personnel incentives, enlisted bonuses, education benefits and retention bonuses. Payments are used as accession and retention incentives to fill critical Marine Corps Military Operational Skill (MOS) positions.

Enlistment Bonus: This incentive is authorized under the provisions of 37 U.S.C 309. As an enlistment tool, the Marine Corps can pay anyone who enlists a maximum of $40,000 for at least a two year enlistment. Selective Reenlistment Bonus: This incentive is authorized under the provisions of 37 U.S.C 308. As a retention tool, the Marine Corps can pay a soldier in a critical skill up to $90,000 for at least a three year reenlistment.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested Marine Corps requires additional funds to mitigate recruiting and retention challenges generated by GWOT. To meet the congressional mandated end strength, the Marine Corps increased its accession mission and the retention mission. To help mitigate the GWOT challenges, the Marine Corps will use enlisted bonuses and education benefits as a recruiting and retention tool. Additionally, the Marine Corps will also use the Marine Corps Home Ownership incentive to expand the recruiting market. The Marine Corps uses legislatively authorized bonus payments for all reenlistments in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait. Funding is also required for the Special Operation Forces (SOF) Critical Skills Retention Bonus. If additional funding is not received, the Marine Corps will be taking serious risk towards achieving its planned accession and retention goals. This will cause difficulty with the Marine Corps achieving its end strength IAW the NDAA and in changing its force structure IAW the modularity plan. The Marine Corps implemented the FY 2007 Recruiting Action Plan across all components to ensure a holistic approach to the accession and retention process. Failing to fund a portion of the process will desynchronize and be a serious detriment to the rest of the program.

26



Budget Line Item: Recruiting and Retention

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountEnlistment Bonus 796 $3,678 2,928 8,552 $6,720 57,469 Reenlistment Bonus 2,140 $14,700 31,460 8,500 $18,392 156,332 Total 34,388 213,801

FY 2007 Title IXEnlistment Bonus - Reenlistment Bonus - Other - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestEnlistment Bonus 57,469 Reenlistment Bonus 156,332 Total 213,801


27







The funds provide the employer’s Social Security Tax payment for mobilized Reserve and Guard and overstrength active enlisted personnel. Summary cost computations are provided by the following table:


FY 2007 Title IXReserve/Guard Mobilization 5,025 Active Component Overstrength - Total 5,025



28


Budget Activity 4: Subsistence of Enlisted Personnel ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Basic Allowance for Subsistence/Subsistence-in-Kind 38,624


The funds requested for this budget activity are for the payment of authorized Basic Allowances for Subsistence (BAS) and Subsistence-in-Kind (SIK). Subsistence-in-Kind includes the cost of procuring subsistence for garrison dining facilities (Subsistence in Messes), operational rations, and augmentation rations. The Marine Corps provides subsistence in mess facilities and operational rations for members of all military services participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Basic Allowance for Subsistence is linked to the Department of Agriculture (DoA) food plan indices. All enlisted members (except recruits and holdees) are entitled to BAS. Members continue to receive BAS while deployed. Subsistence-in-Messes is the cost of bulk subsistence for dining facilities operated in support of OIF and OEF. This requirement is dependent on the number of personnel using the dining facilities and the cost of food. This is an additional cost above the BAS since members are authorized to continue receiving their BAS even though food is provided in theater. Operational Rations are rations used for field subsistence. Operational rations include the Meal-Ready-to Eat (MRE), Unitized Group Rations (UGR) that include “heat and serve” and A-ration varieties, and other operational rations, such as Cold Weather Rations. The SIK funds the cost of operational rations for both officers and enlisted soldiers. The number of active duty personnel and the type of operational rations served determine costs for operational rations.

29




Part II - Justification of Funds Requested This budget activity includes the Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) paid to the mobilized enlisted soldier. The BAS is paid under the following conditions: (1) when authorized to mess separately, (2) while on authorized leave, and (3) when subsistence-in-kind is not available. All mobilized soldiers are paid their full BAS entitlement. Funds provide for incremental subsistence costs for overstrength personnel and personnel supporting OEF/OIF. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table: Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS)Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountReserve/Guard Mobilization 5,750 $2,825 16,244 5,680 $3,336 18,947 Active Component Overstrength 4,804 $2,825 13,571 5,899 $3,336 19,677 Total 10,554 29,815 11,579 38,624




30




Subsistence-In-Kind (SIK) Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountSubsistence in Messes 20,463 $1,818 37,201 - $0 - Meals Ready to Eat (MRE) - - - $0 - Unitized Group Rations - - - $0 - Total 37,201 -

FY 2007 Title IXSubsistence in Messes - Meals Ready to Eat (MRE) - Unitized Group Rations - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestSubsistence in Messes - Meals Ready to Eat (MRE) - Unitized Group Rations - Total -

Total Subsistence of Enlisted Personnel 38,624


31

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION

32


Budget Activity 5: Permanent Change of Station (PCS) ($ in Thousands)

Budget Line Item: Permanent Change of Station (PCS) 47,169


The Permanent Change of Station (PCS) program pays for travel, transportation, storage, and dislocation allowances for reassignment of military members and their families traveling individually or as part of an organized unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Costs are for the dislocation allowance, shipment of household goods, temporary and non-temporary storage of household goods, temporary lodging expense, and member mileage and per diem.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested FY 2007 President’s Budget base budget does not include funding to ensure the Marine Corps meets its increase end strength requirements and distributes the correct grade and skill mix for units deploying in support of the Global War on Terrorism. Accession moves are necessary to ensure the Marine Corps meets increase in end strength requirements and distributes the correct grade and skill mix for units deploying in support of GWOT. There are also increased costs are for moves to support transition teams and deploying units to Iraq and Afghanistan. These moves fully man deploying units to authorized strength levels and provide military advisors to the Iraqi and Afghanistan governments. Additional moves are also required to reset the forces in support of deploying units for OIF and OEF, moves for Soldiers retained due to over strength/stop loss, and Soldiers separating after returning from deployment after stop loss. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

33


Budget Activity 5: Permanent Change of Station (PCS)

Budget Line Item: Permanent Change of Station (PCS)

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountAccession Moves - - 3,000 $1,377 4,131 Operational Moves 3,517 $6,340 22,298 5,781 $7,445 43,038 Rotational Moves - - - $0 - Total 22,298 47,169

FY 2007 Title IXAccession Moves - Operational Moves - Rotational Moves - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestAccession Moves 4,131 Operational Moves 43,038 Rotational Moves - Total 47,169


34

CASUALTY AND DISABILITY BENEFITS

35



Budget Line Item: Casualty and Disability Benefits 40,227

Part I – Purpose and Scope The Service members' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program is a low cost group life insurance for service members on active duty. These payments are required, under section 1969(b) of title 38, United States Code, when actual mortality rates exceed peacetime mortality rates. The T-SGLI is a new program that provides automatic traumatic injury coverage to all service members covered under the Service members' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program. Every member who has SGLI also has T-SGLI, effective December 1, 2005. Funding for death gratuity payments is for payments to survivors of members dying on active duty. The amount payable was increased from $12,000 to $100,000 in Section 664 of the FY 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. Funding is for SGLI/T-SGI insurance premiums that the Department of Defense pays on behalf of service members.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested The funds are required to make extra hazard payment to the Department of Veterans Affairs to finance the increased number of SGLI death claims. Funds are also required to make benefit payments to military personnel who incur a traumatic injury in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The amount needed for non-combat related death gratuities is due to the increase from $12,000 to $100,000 in Section 664 of the FY 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. This entitlement was authorized after the FY 2007 budget was submitted. Section 606 of the FY 2007 National Defense Authorization Act directs the Department to pay the full premium for coverage under Service members’ Group Life Insurance program during service in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) or Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). This amount the Department pays is $29.00 per month for each member.

36



Budget Line Item: Casualty and Disability Benefits

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountSGLI 39,240 47,500 T-SGLI 110,960 1,097 SGLI/T-SGLI Insurance Premium 19,578 $141 2,760 26,122 $349 9,106 Death Gratuity (Combat Deaths) 227 $100,000 22,700 237 $100,000 23,700 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) - $0 - 148 $88,000 13,024 Retro Death Gratuities/SGLI 491 $238,000 116,930 - $0 - Total 292,590 94,427

FY 2007 Title IXSGLI 47,500 T-SGLI 1,097 SGLI/T-SGLI Insurance Premium - Death Gratuity (Combat Deaths) 2,403 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) 3,200 Retro Death Gratuities - Total 54,200

FY 2007 Net RequestSGLI - T-SGLI - SGLI/T-SGLI Insurance Premium 9,106 Death Gratuity (Combat Deaths) 21,297 Death Gratuity (Non-Combat Deaths) 9,824 Retro Death Gratuities - Total 40,227


37

ADDITIONAL MOBILIZATION/DEPLOYMENT COSTS

38



Budget Line Item: Unemployment Benefits 20,500

Part I – Purpose and Scope Unemployment benefits are for payments to ex-service members who are discharged or released under honorable conditions as prescribed in paragraph (1) of section 8521(a) of Title 5, United States Code as amended by Section 301, PL. 102-164.

Part II – Justification of Funds Requested Eligibility for unemployment benefits is defined as active service in the armed forces where upon an individual was discharged under honorable conditions and had completed their first full term of active service; or was discharged before completing their first term under an early release program, because of hardship, for medical reasons, or for personality disorders, or ineptitude (but only if the service was continuous for 365 days or more). These increased costs are primarily the result of Reserve Component mobilization. Summary cost computations are provided in the following table:

Total Strength Rate Amount Strength Rate AmountUnemployment Benefits 9,120 $2,248 20,502 9,119 $2,248 20,500 Total 20,502 20,500

FY 2007 Title IXUnemployment Benefits - Total -

FY 2007 Net RequestUnemployment Benefits 20,500 Total 20,500



Operation and Maintenance

Exhibit O-1 (GWOT/RWOT Summary of Operations (Page 1 of 4)

Department of the Navy Global War on Terror (GWOT)

Operations and Maintenance, Navy O-1 Line Item Summary (Dollars in Thousands)

O-1 Line Item

Number Budget Activity

Sub-Activity Group

Sub-Activity Group Name FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

FY 2007 Title IX

FY 2007 Supplemental

FY 2007 Total

Estimate

010 01 1A1A Mission & Other Flight Operations 816,035 330,000 1,128,9651,113,115*

1,458,965 1,443,115*

020 01 1A2A Fleet Air Training 6,444 10,000 41,661 51,661 030 01 1A3A Intermediate Maintenance 6,034 2,442 1,420 3,862 040 01 1A4A Air Operations and Safety Support 62,089 0 6,614 6,614 050 01 1A4N Air Systems Support 26,340 5,720 6,005 11,725 060 01 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance 503,575 178,659 190,304 368,963 080 01 1B1B Mission & Other Ship Operations 512,736 170,000 775,683 945,683 090 01 1B2B Ship Operational Support/Training 15,133 6,400 15,417 21,817 100 01 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance 387,261 263,229 278,235 541,464 110 01 1B5B Ship Depot Operations Support 18,430 0 11,463 11,463 120 01 1C1C Combat Communications 9,083 2,500 10,656 13,156 130 01 1C2C Electronic Warfare 6,000 1,690 9,088 10,778 140 01 1C3C Space Systems & Surveillance 0 0 3,190 3,190 150 01 1C4C Warfare Tactics 13,576 11,664 11,861 23,525 160 01 1C5C Op Meteorology and Oceanography 1,883 1,036 4,919 5,955 170 01 1C6C Combat Support Forces 933,155 281,800 1,276,814

1,235,379*1,558,614

1,517,179* 180 01 1C7C Equipment Maintenance 47,988 0 8,991 8,991 220 01 1D3D In-Service Weapons Systems Support 18,000 0 23,316 23,316 230 01 1D4D Weapons Maintenance 37,923 0 6,671 6,671 000 01 1D7D Other Weapons Systems Support 0 0 463 463 250 01 BSM1 Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Mod 44,426 0 27,665 27,665


(FSRM) 260 01 BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS) 290,110 104,190 491,069 595,259 270 02 2A1F Ship Prepositioning & Surge 172,076 2,300 162,761 165,061 300 02 2C1H Fleet Hospital Program 2,354 0 7,903 7,903 330 03 3A1J Officer Acquisition 0 0 71 71 360 03 3B1K Specialized Skill Training 28,708 4,900 67,849 72,749 370 03 3B2K Flight Training 0 0 8,656 8,656 400 03 3C1L Recruiting & Advertising 0 0 1,152 1,152 440 04 4A1M Administration 3,446 0 6,027 6,027 450 04 4A2M External Relations 325 0 98 98 470 04 4A4M Military Manpower/Personnel Management 3,588 1,000 1,188 2,188 480 04 4A5M Other Personnel Support 1,793 0 2,392 2,392 490 04 4A6M Servicewide Communications 24,359 18,000 72,089

71,489*90,089

89,489* 510 04 4B1N Servicewide Transportation 181,215 66,200 194,011 260,211 530 04 4B2N Planning, Engineer & Design 0 0 3 3 540 04 4B3N Acquisition and Program Management 69,540 25,000 54,212 79,212 570 04 4B6N Combat/Weapons System 360 0 436 436 580 04 4B7N Space & Electronic Warfare System 0 0 55 55 590 04 4C0P Security Programs 34,575 33,331 106,962

65,047*140,293 98,378*

590 04 4C1P Naval Investigative Service 0 5,227 3,654 8,881

Appropriation Totals

4,278,560 1,525,288 5,019,9894,920,189*

6,545,277 6,445,477*

CG USCG U.S. Coast Guard Support 175,020 90,000 120,293 210,293

Appropriation Totals (w/USCG)

4,453,580 1,615,288 5,140,2825,040,482*

6,755,570 6,655,770*

* Errata Note: Line items marked “*” contain changes to reflect the revised FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request. This includes eliminating the Regional War on Terror portion (CONPLAN 7500) and a reduction to reflect revised fuel pricing assumptions.


The previous OP-5 Justification Book reflected the reduction of $805.115 million to expanded deployment (“surge”) requirements based on revised estimates. The following table summarizes the Sub-Activity Groups (SAG) affected by this revision as they were presented in the FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request Operations and Maintenance, Navy OP-5 Justification Book prior to the Errata Note changes reflected above: Revised Estimate Table reflecting reduction to Navy “Surge” cost estimate.

SAG Previous Revised Reduction Amount

1A1A 1,179,203 1,128,965 50,238

1B1B 800,126 775,683 24,443

1C6C 1,683,241 1,276,814 406,427

4B1N 462,413 194,011 268,402

4B3N 109,817 54,212 55,605

TOTAL - - 805,115


Department of the Navy Global War on Terror (GWOT)

Operations and Maintenance, Navy Summary of Operations

I. Description of Operations Financed: Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) include the Department of the Navy’s efforts for conducting stability and coalition support operations throughout Iraq, Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa, and other regions, as well as destroying terrorist training camps and infrastructure, capturing Hussein regime loyalists and Al Qaeda leaders, stopping terrorists activities, and preventing the re-emergence of international terrorist organizations. These objectives also include military-related reconstruction operations. Support costs include activation of Reserve personnel and units, increased fuel consumption and spare parts, additional maintenance to support higher usage of equipment, deployment of medical capabilities (hospital ships and deployable fleet hospitals), extended communications and intelligence support, and related transportation costs. Additionally, costs include the purchase of investment items lost, damaged, or in need of replacement resulting from increased “wear and tear” from higher operating tempos. II. Force Structure Summary: The continued deployment of approximately12,500 Navy personnel (9,000 Navy personnel as part of OIF and 3,500 Navy personnel as part of OEF Afghanistan and other areas) to support conventional and irregular ground operations (boots on the ground – BOG), to include approximately 5,200 reserve military personnel and civilians during FY 2007 supporting these contingency operation, including a planned rotation of forces. Additionally, Navy ships in the area will increase the total average number of Navy personnel in theater to approximately 20,000, as carrier striking groups / expeditionary striking groups move in and out of the areas of operations. Also included are reserve military personnel not in-theater who are either being called up, demobilized, retained in a medical hold status, or providing other contingency operation support.

Types of Forces FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

Ships 95 82Aircraft 367 309Tanks, Combat Vehicles Support Vehicles Ground Combat Forces Ground Support Forces 8,500 12,500Other Forces

Personnel FY 2006 Average Deployed

FY 2007 Average Deployed

Active 27,119 32,519Reserve 5,297 5,174Guard Totals 32,416 37,693

Exhibit OP-5 (GWOT) Detail by Subactivity Group (Page 1 of 61)

OP-5 Exhibits by BA/SAG 1A1A Mission and Other Flight Ops 2 1A2A Fleet Air Training 5 1A3A Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance 7 1A4A Air Operations and Safety Support 9 1A4N Air Systems Support 11 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance 12 1B1B Mission and Other Ship Ops 14 1B2B Ship Operations Support/Training 17 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance 19 1B5B Ship Depot Operations Support 20 1C1C Combat Communications 21 1C2C Electronic Warfare 23 1C3C Space Systems and Surveillance 24 1C4C Warfare Tactics 25 1C5C Op Meteorology and Oceanography 27 1C6C Combat Support Forces 29 1C7C Equipment Maintenance 33 1D3D In-service Weapons Systems Support 34 1D4D Weapons Maintenance 35 1D7D Other Weapons System Support 36 BSM1 Facilities Sustain., Restor and Mod (FSRM) 37 BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS) 38 2A1F Ship Prepositioning and Surge 40 2C1H Fleet Hospital Program 42 3A1J Officer Acquisition 43 3B1K Specialized Skill Training 44 3B2K Flight Training 45 3C1L Recruiting and Advertising 46 4A1M Administration 47 4A2M External Relations 49 4A4M Military Manpower/Personnel Mgt 50 4A5M Other Personnel Support 51 4A6M Servicewide Communications 53 4B1N Servicewide Transportation 54 4B2N Planning, Engineering and Design 555 4B3N Acquisition and Program Mgt 56 4B6N Combat Weapons Systems 57 4B7N Space and Electronic Warfare System 58 4C0P Classified Programs 59 4C1P Classified Programs 61

* REVISED 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST **FY06 Actuals include fuel pricing adjustments funded in FY06 supplementals


NAVY Contingency Operation: OIF/OEF/GWOT Operations

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Budget Activity 1

Activity Group 1A Detail by Subactivity Group 1A1A Mission and Other Flight Ops

I. Description of Operations Financed: Mission and Other Flight Operations includes all Navy and Marine Corps Tactical Air (TACAIR) and Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) forces, shore-based fleet air support, operational testing and evaluation, and miscellaneous items such as transportation of squadron equipment and personnel travel/Temporary Active Duty (TAD) during deployment workups. Funding provides flying hours to maintain an adequate level of readiness enabling Navy and Marine Corps aviation forces to perform their primary mission as required in support of national objectives. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A1A: Mission and Other Flight Ops Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 2,555 2,555

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 2. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 11,287 0 22,442 22,442

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan; DPRGP (Director Patrol Reconnaissance Group Pacific) & CVWP (COMVAQWINGPAC); DPRGP/Commander Fleet Air Western Pacific (CFWP)/AIR AMBULANCE - HSC21/25/USMC; DIRPATRECONFORPAC & COMFAIRWESTPAC. Funds aircrew, aviation organizational and intermediate maintenance, and flight operations personnel. Examples of items covered are per diem, rental vehicles, billeting.

3. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 1,957 0 2,444 2,444

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes CVWP supplies – Chemical Defense Uniforms (CDUs) and Inclement Weather Clothing (e.g. desert flight suits, non-standard desert utility uniforms, boots, gas masks, and chemical protective clothing).

4. CBS 2.5 – Other Personnel Support 585 0 592 592

a. Narrative Justification: Includes other personnel support costs not included above such as permanent change of station, end of term of service, or special actions associated with houshold goods or privately-owned vehicle storage. Navy request includes items such as: Contractor personnel and operating costs associated with helicopter air ambulance.


5. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 411,296 411,296 395,446 395,446

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget and FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture.

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes a reduction based on lower fuel pricing assumption.

6. CBS 3.1 - Training 2,088 0 1,410 1,410

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with training troops and personnel during the contingency operation. Examples include COMNAVAIRPAC simulator program.

7. CBS 3.2 – Operations OPTEMPO 733,565 330,000 616,656 946,656

a. Narrative Justification: Incremental cost of flying hours above baseline supporting the GWOT, plus materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies, etc. The substantial increase from FY 2006 reflects increases in fuel prices.

8. CBS 3.3 – Other Supplies and Equipment 8,107 0 105 105

a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes Commander Patrol Reconnaissance Force Pacific (CTF-72) supplies and CVWP supplies for OIF/OEF forward deployments.

9. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 16,815 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activities performed at the intermediate level facility. Includes the cost to clean, inspect, and maintain oraganic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Navy request includes contingency Repair, Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Support, Van Maintenance, and Other Aircraft Support.

10. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 6,180 0 3,432 3,432

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes Commander Fifth Fleet (C5F) location lease vehicles, and contractor support for mission rehearsal exercises.

11. CBS 4.0 – Transportation Costs 0 0 1,563 1,563

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture.


12. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 35,451 0 66,470 66,470

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportaion of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by air either by commercial or military assets. Examples include Air Mobility Command Special Assignment Airlift Mission (AMC SAAM) airlifts & movements of retrograde shipments. (Note: Navy is responsible for Marine Corps personnel and equipment transportation to and from operating destinations, and tactical air sustainment while in-theater. Marine Corps is responsible for all ground transportation while in-theater.)

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Estimate Total 816,035 330,000 1,128,965 1,458,965 1,113,115 1,443,115




Activity Group 1A Detail by Subactivity Group 1A2A Fleet Air Training

I. Description of Operations Financed: Fleet Air Training includes pre-deployment training for Fleet squadrons participating in GWOT mission-related tasking. Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center (NSAWC) training is provided to enhance baseline training regimes in order to incorporate the latest in-theater skills necessary for combat-effective employement of air assets in OIF and OEF Areas of Operations (AORs). NSAWC staff also deploy as Temporarily Assigned Duty (TAD) personnel to operational sites to evaluate training curriculum applications in real-world environments. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A2A: Fleet Air Training Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 27,707 27,707


2. CBS 3.1 - Training 0 0 5,166 5,166

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with training troops and personnel during the contingency operation.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes supplies & equip for Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Depot (AIMD) deployments.

4. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 0 10,000 8,472 18,472

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportaion of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by air either by commercial or military assets. Examples include Air Mobility Command Special Assignment Airlift Missions (AMC SAAM) and movements of retrograde shipments.

5. CBS 4.5 – Other Transportation 0 0 13 13

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland tranportation. Navy request includes items such as Material to Southwest Asia, Fujayrah, UAE, trucking, intra airlift, shipping material to 5th Fleet Area of Operations (AOR).


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 6,444 10,000 41,661 51,661




Activity Group 1A Detail by Subactivity Group 1A3A Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: This program provides formal and on-the-job training to aviation maintenance personnel at the organizational and intermediate levels of maintenance by Navy Engineering Technical Service/Contractor Engineering Technical Service (NETS/CETS) personnel. The purpose of the training is to elevate the technical knowledge and skills of active Navy and Marine aviation maintenance technicians in the troubleshooting, installation, maintenance, repair, and operation of all types of aviation equipment and associated support equipment. In addition, this sub-activity group provides the equipment and supplies necessary to run Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department (AIMD) sites on a day-to-day basis, including travel for military personnel at the AIMDs to support overseas detachments. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A3A: Intermediate Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 948 948

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 2. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 2,768 2,442 66 2,508

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan; deployment Temporarily Assigned Duty (TAD) for the AIMDs.

3. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 51 0 65 65

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.


4. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 310 310


5. CBS 3.3 – Other Supplies and Equipment 29 0 4 4

a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes supplies and equip for AIMD deployments.


a. Narrative Justification: The cost included when required material and maintenance of an end item or system is performed by contract support. Navy request includes NATEC ETS Contractor Support.

7. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 0 0 27 27

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Totals 6,034 2,442 1,420 3,862


NAVY

Contingency Operation: OIF/OEF/GWOT Operations Operation and Maintenance, Navy

Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1A

Detail by Subactivity Group 1A4A Air Operations and Safety Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: Air Operations and Safety supports eight major programs.

The Aviation Mobile Facilities program supports aviation mobile facility configurations for the Navy and Marine Corps. The Expeditionary Airfields (EAF) program supports airfield matting refurbishment, in-service engineering, life-cycle management, logistical and technical

efforts, and fleet direct and technical support for expeditionary airfields. The Aircraft Launch and Recovery Equipment (ALRE) program provides life-cycle, logistical, engineering and technical efforts for aircraft launch and

recovery equipment including visual landing aids, aircraft/ship interface and integration, and aircraft fire-fighting management. The Aviation Facilities and Landing Aids program supports improvements in shore-based landing aids, installation of the Naval Air Systems Command

(NAVAIR) provided equipment, development/revision of aviation facilities planning and design criteria, and NAVAIR facilities management functions. The Aviation Life Support Systems program provides in-service basic design engineering and logistics management support for over 1,000 Aircrew Systems

products for the total life cycle. Examples of Aircrew Systems products that are essential to aircrew safety and survival include clothing and equipment that Navy and Marine Corps aircrew and passengers need to function within all flight envelopes (helmets, oxygen masks, flight suits, gloves, in-flight personal communications), escape safely from disabled aircraft (ejection seats, parachutes, Helicopter Emergency Escape Devices), survive on land and water (water flotation/life vests, seat survival kits, medical items), and effect a successful rescue (survival radios/electronics, rescue slings, horse collar, hoisting rings).

The Air Traffic Control (ATC) program provides logistics, engineering, and maintenance support for identification and landing systems for facilities ashore and afloat.

The Marine Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems (MATCALS) program provides depot maintenance and engineering support for tactical shore-based landing aids and Marine air traffic control systems. The shore-based landing aids program and the air traffic control program provide engineering support for landing aid improvements and replacement of obsolete landing systems support at all USMC aviation shore facilities worldwide. MATCALS ensures restoration of USMC aviation end items.

The Naval Air Technical Data and Engineering Services Command (NATEC) program manages the development, implementation and maintenance of the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) technical documentation programs that support aeronautical weapons and equipment throughout their life cycle. This includes engineering drawings, technical directives, technical manuals, and administrative support of Engineering Technical Services (ETS).

II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A4A: Air Operations and Safety Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 5,714 5,714




a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Examples of items in the Navy request are as follows: Marine Air Traffic Control and Landing System (MATCALS), PRC-112 Survival Radio Test Set Shortage, and Expeditionary Airfield (EAF) War Losses.


a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 62,089 0 6,614 6,614




Activity Group 1A Detail by Subactivity Group 1A4N Air Systems Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Air Systems Support program provides funding for engineering and logistics analysis necessary to sustain all out-of-production aircraft systems and equipment. This includes support to sustain 38 Type / Model / Series (T/M/S) aircraft platforms across Navy and Marine Corps Training and Test and Evaluation Commands. Additionally, it provides for critical aircraft components, ground support equipment, automatic test equipment, and information systems which capture, store and maintain system performance, failure and readiness maintenance data provided to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). Technical products include maintenance plans and procedures, technical data updates (drawings, publications, provisioning information), and system software maintenance to include threat library assessment necessary to meet inventory requirements of the Fleet Response Plan (FRP) and offset effects of aging-on systems, obsolescence, and component reliability II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A4N: Air Systems Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 2,175 2,175


2. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 26,340 5,720 3,830 9,550

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. The Navy request includes the following items: EA-6B Aging Aircraft Mitigation/Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Validation, Desert Maintenance Requirement Card (MRC) Deck Establishment (H-1/H-46/H-53/FA-18/EA-6B/AV-8B/MV-22B), National Airworthiness Team (NATIP), and Joint Combat Assessment (JCAT) and H-53 Support Equipment.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total

Totals 26,340 5,720 6,005 11,725


NAVY



Detail by Subactivity Group 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Aircraft Depot Maintenance program provides for Airframe, Engine and Component rework to meet established Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) readiness goals. Increased wear and tear on deployed aircraft and increase life-cycle usage rates require increased depot maintenance efforts in order to provide the necessary Fleet assets at the desired readiness goals. Thsee goals are:

1. Airframe Rework: maintain deployed and work-up squadrons at a 100% Primary Aircraft Authorization (PAA) and non-deployed squadrons at 90% of PAA.

2. Engine Rework: maintain a net Ready-for-Issue (RFI) engine/module spares pool at 90% of authorized levels and zero bare firewalls.

A. Airframe Rework - This program provides for the inspection, rework, and emergent repairs of fleet aircraft. Through periodic depot level maintenance, aircraft major structures and airframe systems are maintained in a safe, flyable condition. The Aircraft Service Period Adjustment (ASPA) Program adjusts individual aircraft period end dates for selected aircraft when material condition warrants. Under ASPA guidelines, only aircraft that, upon inspection, cannot safely be extended for another 12-month tour are inducted in the depot for Standard Depot Level Maintenance (SDLM). Depot maintenance is currently being performed under both the SDLM and Integrated Maintenance Concept (IMC) programs. Currently, the E-2, E-6, EA-6B, F/A-18, H-1, H-46, H-53, H-60, C-130, P-3, AV-8B, C-2, and S-3 aircraft programs have been incorporated under the IMC concept. The IMC concept uses Planned Maintenance Intervals (PMI), performing more frequent depot maintenance with smaller work packages, and reducing out of service time. The goal of this program is to improve readiness while reducing operating and support costs. B. Engine Rework - The engine rework program accomplishes the repair, modification and overhaul of aircraft engines, gearboxes, and torque meters. The program objective is to return depot-repairable engines to Ready-for-Issue (RFI) status to support fleet engine pool requirements. Under the Engine Analytical Maintenance Program (EAMP), engines are repaired at the lowest echelon of maintenance possible. Only engines that are beyond the repair capability of intermediate maintenance activities are scheduled for induction in the depots. C. Components - The Component Repair Program supports the depot level repair of aeronautical components for the aircraft systems and equipment under Contractor Logistics Support (CLS). CLS support is provided for weapon systems and equipment that will be commercially supported for the life-of-type, and special programs and projects that do not have material support date (MSD) established. This program also funds contractor maintenance of engines for the V-22 Osprey (Power by the Hour) program and the KC-130J.


II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A5A: Aircraft Depot Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 137,193 137,193


2. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 503,575 178,659 53,111 231,770

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Examples include: KC-130J Increased Power by the Hour, Engine Depot Maintenance, Aircraft Depot Maintenance, CH-53 Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Center (AMARC – Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) Restoration, S-3B Lantirn/Rover Integration. Reflects continued increases in the cost of aviation depot maintenance. Increased engine/flight hours driving depot maintenance for airframes and mechanical systems.




Operation and Maintenance, Navy Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1B

Detail by Subactivity Group 1B1B Mission and Other Ship Ops

I. Description of Operations Financed: This sub-activity group provides resources for all aspects of ship operations required to continuously deploy combat ready warships and supporting forces in support of national objectives. Programs supported include operating tempo (OPTEMPO), fleet and unit training, operational support such as command and control, pier side support and port services, organizational maintenance, and associated administrative & other support. Costs consist of distillate fuel to support OPTEMPO underway days per quarter, organizational level repairs, supplies and equipage (S&E), utilities costs, Temporailiy Assigned Duty (TAD) for shipboard and afloat staff personnel, nuclear propulsion fuel consumption and processing costs, and charter of leaseback units through the Military Sealift Command (MSC). II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B1B: Mission and Other Ship Ops Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 1,990 1,990


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan, Commander Seventh Fleet (C7F): Joint Task Force Five Fifteen (JTF 515, extended maritime interdiction operations off the Phillipines) Support Stockham travel Temporaily Assigned Duty (TAD) for Afloat Training Group (ATG)/Others to support Joint Special Operations Task Force – Phillipines (JSOTF-P) and JTF-515. Also includes travel to support Fly Away Teams to support submarines (SSNs) in Central Command Area of Operations.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not alreadyissued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.

4. CBS 2.3 – Medical Support / Health Services 0 0 9,654 9,654

a. Narrative Justification: Additive costs associated with providing medical services to military and civilians in clinics, hospitals, hospital ships or other medical tratment facilities.


a. Narrative Justification: Other personnel support costs not included above such as permanent change of station, end of term of service, or special actions associated with houshold goods or privately-owned vehicle storage.


6. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 310,684 310,684


7. CBS 3.1 - Training 95 0 1,716 1,716

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with training troops and personnel during the contingency operation.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the incremental cost to operate units that conduct or support OIF, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Navy request includes items such as: Combat Systems Equipment Inspections and Repairs - Support additional costs related combat systems repairs, such as Combat System Operability Testing and Combat Systems Review Analysis (CSPAT/CSRA) costs; readiness requirements needed to support a deployment ready/surge capable force. The substantial increase from FY 2006 reflects increases in fuel prices.

9. CBS 3.3 – Other Supplies and Equipment 109,965 0 6,497 6,497

a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes Commander Third Fleet (C3F) Logisitics in support of training exercises; C3F Quickdraw Opposition Force "OPFOR" vessel; Commander Seventh Fleet (C7F): Joint Task Force (JTF)-515 Support Stockham Supplies; Commander Naval Forces Japan (CNFJ): SPS-49 parts, and fuel for generator.

10. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 7,121 0 10,954 10,954

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment organizational and intermediate maintenance activites performed at the organizational level, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

11. CBS 3.6 – C4I 0 0 1,351 1,351

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: port costs for Forward Deployed Naval Forces/Expanded Maritime Intercept Operations (FDNF/EMIO) ships, leased equipment and services in foreign ports - CT (COUNTER -TERRORISM).

13. CBS 4.0 – Transportation Costs 0 0 447 447


a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 14. CBS 4.2 – Sealift 13,340 0 40,393 40,393

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by sea using commercial or active duty naval ships. (Note: Navy is responsible for Marine Corps personnel and equipment transportation to and from operating destinations, and tactical air sustainment while in-theater. Marine Corps is responsible for all ground transportation while in-theater.)

15. CBS 4.4 – Port Handling/Inland Transportation 996 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Port handling costs and transportation of personnel, equipment, and material by land. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 512,736 170,000 775,683 945,683




Detail by Subactivity Group 1B2B Ship Operations Support/Training

I. Description of Operations Financed: Ship Operational Support and Training provides for the detailed pre-planning, engineering, training and range operations necessary to insure that all operating force ships and nuclear attack submarines and their crews are operating at high levels of readiness. Specific programs funded include submarine support, surface ship support, and Receipt, Segregation, Storage, and Issue (RSSI). Submarine Support includes the Submarine Operations and Safety Program, which provides technical direction and engineering support to safely extend the operating interval between shipyard overhauls for operational submarines. Surface Support includes the AEGIS Program, which supports the Navy's AEGIS cruiser and destroyer fleet. The RSSI program provides for the movement, handling, storage, and disposal of ordnance as required by Fleet operations and for inventory management. The RSSI program supports personnel and material to manage the Navy worldwide disposable ordnance inventory and accomplishes required reuse and declassification in the most effective and economical manner consistent with safety, security, and environmental regulations and constraints. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B2B: Ship Operations Support/Training Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 313 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 63 63

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 3. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 431 0 116 116

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Iraq/ Kuwait; Naval Magazine (NAVMAG) Guam: Quick Response Team.




5. CBS 3.1 - Training 389 0 1,563 1,563

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with tyraining tropps and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: amortized annual cost of training/ISEA Support for Blue Ridge and Kitty Hawk Systems (DCGS-N Program); NAVMAG Guam: Technical Transportation of Hazmat Training - Required prior to deployment to Bahrain.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the incremental cost to operate units that conduct or support OIF/OEF, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Navy request includes support costs associated with loading/off-loading of ordnance.

7. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 1,865 0 714 714

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: Global Signals Analysis Lab - Maritime Cryptographic database support for time sensitive targeting, Shipboard Conventional Ordnance Safety Review (COSR) of ships prior to ships deployment, expedited technical review and endorsement of Siting requests; deviations from explosive safety criteria and participation in Ammunition and Hazardous Material (AMHAZ) Handling Review Boards.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total

Total 15,133 6,400 15,417 21,817




Detail by Subactivity Group 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: Financing within this program supports maintenance ranging from Overhauls (OH) to Restricted /Technical Availabilities (RA/TA) performed at Naval Shipyards (public) or private shipyards. Ship overhauls restore the ship, including all operating systems that affect safety or current combat capability, to established performance standards. This includes the correction of all discrepancies found during pre-overhaul tests and inspections or developed from maintenance history analysis. RA/TA repairs include selected restricted availabilities, phased maintenance availabilities, emergent repairs, service craft overhauls, repairs during post-shakedown of new units, interim dry docking, battery renewals and various miscellaneous type repairs. Non-depot/Intermediate Maintenance supports fleet maintenance performed by Navy personnel and civilians on tenders, repair ships, aircraft carriers, Shore Intermediate Maintenance Activities (SIMAs) and Naval Submarine Support Facility (NSSF) New London. The SIMA program funds the pay of civilian personnel, materials and day-to-day operations at the SIMAs. Naval Submarine Support Facility (NSSF) New London provides intermediate level maintenance, ordnance, and supply support to nuclear attack submarines, support vessels and service craft. These amounts are in addition to baseline budgets and prepare ships for potential longer deployment and extended operating tempos. Upon return from deployments, these funds supplement baseline budgets to complete repairs and overhauls resulting from those longer deployments and higher OPTEMPOs. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B4B: Ship Depot Maintnance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 169,393 169,393


2. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 387,261 263,229 108,842 372,071

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Costs include additional work for ships preparing for GWOT deployment in anticipation of higher operating tempo and for possible longer deployments, as well as additional work above normal peacetime levels for ships returining from deployment based on those higher operating tempos.





Detail by Subactivity Group 1B5B Ship Depot Operations Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: A variety of depot maintenance programs are funded within this sub-activity group. The planning and technical support function supports management for availabilities, life cycle maintenance, and class maintenance impacts due to alterations, repair material management, and special projects for ship logistics managers. The Supervisors of Shipbuilding, Conversion, and Repair (SUPSHIPs) are designated contract administrators and on-site technical and business agents for the Navy Department and other Department of Defense shipbuilding, design and conversion and facility contracts at assigned shipyards. They are also responsible for planning, procuring, and providing field program management of overhauls, repairs, alterations, and inactivations performed on Naval and other DOD ships at private shipyards. The Fleet Modernization Program (FMP) funds all design services in support of O&M,N alterations. The FMP is designed to upgrade ships of the fleet to be mission capable in countering current and projected threats and improve operational capabilities. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B5B: Ship Depot Operations Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 4,566 4,566



a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation.





Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C1C Combat Communications

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding provides for communications systems that directly support fleet operations. The Naval Network and Space Operations Command operates and maintains space systems (spacecraft and ground-based components) to fulfill Naval and national requirements. Funding provides support for portions of space operations and the associated equipment to be augmented to forward deployed forces involved in GWOT. Additional programs supported are Electronic Command and Control Systems including Anti-Submarine Warfare Operations Centers (ASWOCs), Operation Support System (OSS), Navy Tactical Command Systems Afloat (NTCSA), Global Command and Control System (GCCS), Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), Navigation System Management, Ring Laser Gyro Navigator (RLGN) and Joint Maritime Command Information Systems (JMCIS) (ashore, tactical/mobile and afloat). The Follow-On Satellite Program supports the Fleet satellite constellation and provides reliable communication links among Navy forces with EHF, UHF and SHF capabilities. The Mobile Ashore Support Terminal (MAST) is a self-contained portable C4I system that can be rapidly deployed to provide an initial C4I capability for a Naval Component Commander (NCC) for a Naval Liaison Detachment operating ashore. The Mobile Integrated Command Facility (MICFAC) is a complete mobile command center designed to support the NCC in Joint Operations. The AN/MSQ-126 Tactical Command System, also is funded in this budget line. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C1C: Combat Communications Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 6 6

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 2. CBS 2.5 – Other Personnel Support 18 0 84 84

a. Narrative Justification: Includes unusual personnel support costs not captured above, such as permanent change of station (PCS), end of term of service (ETS), or special actions associated with household goods or privately-owned vehicle (POV) storage.


a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment and FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 4. CBS 3.6 – C4I 8,725 2,500 7,497 9,997

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations. Navy request includes modification costs for message standard strength tracking of the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System, (also known as Link 16), spread spectrum frequency-hopping data addresses.

5. CBS 4.0 – Transportation Costs 0 0 177 177


a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 6. CBS 4.5 – Other Transportation 340 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Transporation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland transportation. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 9,083 2,500 10,656 13,156




Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C2C Electronic Warfare

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding provides for ship operations electronic warfare support including Quick Reaction Capability Support and various electronic warfare decoys and deception devices, and a wide spectrum of electronic warfare support including radar and anti-ship missile warning and defense systems maintenance and software support. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C2C: Electronic Warfare Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 1,487 1,487

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget and FY 2007

expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 2. CBS 3.2 – Operations OPTEMPO 0 1,690 2,310 4,000

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the incremental cost to operate units, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Navy request includes: corrective maintenace and fuel works up in support of GWOT. Assault Craft Unit One (ACU1): Repair parts and consumables. – First Naval Construction Division (1NCD): Force Protection (Convoy Security / Tactical Movement Team); Repair components and parts for equipment maintanance support.

3. CBS 3.6 – C4I 6,000 0 5,291 5,291

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of analyzing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations.




Operation and Maintenance,Navy Budget Activity 1

Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C3C Space Systems and Surveillance

I. Description of Operations Financed: This subactivity group includes funding for Naval Network and Space Operations Command (NNSOC); space systems management; tracking, telemetry and control; and undersea surveillance. The NNSOC supports naval space policy and strategy by providing direct support to fleet units world-wide through integrated control of naval space programs. The command coordinates Navy-wide operational space resources and personnel required to fulfill Fleet missions. Tracking, telemetry and control program consists of a large continuous wave radar system to detect and track satellites. Evaluated satellite information from this system supports over 600 activities, consisting of all Fleet units, various naval shore installations, and other departments of the Government. Primary mission for Fleet support is vulnerability data assessment for United States Navy and Marine Corps operating forces. Primarily a supplier of surveillance system data to deployed forces involved in contingency operations where information on telecommunications and asset movements of hostile forces can be collected and disseminated. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C3C: Space Systems and Surveillance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 0 0 3,184 3,184

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation.


a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 0 3,190 3,190




Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C4C Warfare Tactics

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding in this subactivity group supports a variety of warfare tactics, development and execution efforts designed to improve and enhance naval warfighting capabilities. These efforts include: Enhanced Naval Warfare Gaming System (ENWGS); naval warfare management; warfare tactics development/documentation; exercise support and analysis; fleet training administration and range operations; and unified commands. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C4C: Warfare Tactics Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 89 89


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include TAD for training for MTT, MIO/VBSS.



4. CBS 3.1 - Training 9,136 10,430 3,740 14,170

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with tyraining tropps and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request includes Commander Naval Forces Pacific (CNP) N7 Naval Magazine (NAVMAG) Guam: Prepare vessel for Vertical Boarding Search and Seizure (VBSS) training for Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) forces.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes: Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE) equipment for inclusion of coalition forces and support equipment for Maritime Intercept Operations/Vertical Boarding Search and Seizure (MIO/VBSS) training.


6. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 3,136 1,234 44 1,278

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the organizational level, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

7. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 1,002 0 834 834

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 13,576 11,664 11,861 23,525




Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C5C Op Meteorology and Oceanography

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding within this subactivity group supports the performance of Naval meteorological and oceanographic mission functions worldwide and provides a wide array of essential operational meteorological and oceanographic products and services to operating forces afloat and ashore. These services include collecting and processing environmental data using resources such as oceanographic ships, aircraft, and computing systems. These products and services enhance the performance of active and passive sensors and weapon systems and optimize the effectiveness of the sea control mission for mine countermeasures and tactics. Hydrographic data from near shore areas support the production of coastal combat approach, harbor, and special purpose nautical charts used to address littoral operating units from the Oceanography Command’s numerical modeling and forecasting centers and from forecasting support activities worldwide. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C5C: Op Meteorology and Oceanography Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 133 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of civilian pay such as overtime, nightshift differential pay, holiday pay, hazard duty pay, etc. 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 185 185


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Iraq/ Kuwait; flights for oceanographic modeling; Fleet Survey Team (FST) flights, & Airborne Laser Identification Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) Surveys & Other Temporary Duty (TDY) Costs.




a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes buoys & floaters in support of Flights & CHARTS surveys.

6. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 0 0 1,800 1,800


a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the organizational level, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

7. CBS 3.6 – C4I 120 0 560 560

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations: Navy request includes: support for 5 Meteorological Mobile Facility (METMF) systems deployed to IRAQ that require In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) support. The METMF is a fully integrated, tactical USMC weather system that supports the Marine Air-Ground Task Force.

8. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 320 1,036 1,077 2,113

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: Flight time, Currency Exchange Loss, Miscellaneous Services, and Laser Identification Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) Support Contract.





Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C6C Combat Support Forces

I. Description of Operations Financed: This subactivity group includes funding to support ship environmental protection diving and salvage operations, fleet commands and staffs, ocean facilities program, fleet-wide imaging services, unified commands support, operations of Navy Mobile Construction Battalions (NMCB's), Amphibious Craft Units, Special Combat Support Forces, and repair of combatant craft. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C6C Combat Support Forces Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 647 0 1,315 1,315

a. Narrative Justification: 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 32,793 32,793

a. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 3. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 108,456 0 106,115 106,115 105,615 105,615

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa: Training teams to Forward Deployed Naval Forces (FDNF) to prep for surge operations. Commander Pacific Fleet (CPF): Military Working Dogs; Temporarily Assigned Duty (TAD) rotation costs for 12 deployed Combat Camera Personnel – Commander Naval Surface Forces Pacific (CNSP): Assault Craft Unit Five (ACU5): Travel to 5th Fleet AOR in support of FDNF Craft deployed. Assault Craft Unit One (ACU1): Emergent travel for craftmasters. – First Naval Construction Division (1NCD): 1NCD Forward (FWD)/Thirtieth Naval Construction Regiment (30NCR) & Battalion Deployment TAD costs (includes deployment per diem); travel in support of mission rehearsal exercise; Joint Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Task Force Combined Explosive Explotiation Cell TAD; per diem associated with mobilized reservists/Active Duty Support Work (ADSW) personnel & TAD costs for individual augmentees.

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements with a reduction of $0.5M for classified programs. 4. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 63,153 117,980 75,615 193,595

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not alreadyissued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes $25M in body armor. Also includes organizational clothing/Initial Equipment for Combat Skills Warrior, Rapid Fielding Initiative Issues and Personally Procured Personal Protective Equipment OC/IE for large scale mobilization in support of GWOT.


5. CBS 2.3 – Medical Support / Health Services 1,163 0 11,393 11,393

a. Narrative Justification: Additive costs associated with providing medical services to military and civilians in clinics, hospitals, hospital ships or other medical tratment facilities. Navy request includes: CNSP: ACU5: Recoup medical cost provided to deploying detachments (DETs). Beachmaster Unit One (BMU-1) Medical supplies/EMT kits - 1NCD: Battalion Medical/Consumables Authorized Medical Allowance List/ Authorized Dental Allowance List (AMAL/ADALs); Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT)-medical supplies for Commander Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) personnel located downrange.

6. CBS 2.5 – Other Personnel Support 4,350 0 6,590 6,590

a. Narrative Justification: Other personnel support costs not included above such as permanent change of station, end of term of service, or special actions associated with houshold goods or privately-owned vehicle storage. Navy request includes items such as: Contractor personnel support to maintain and operate Pollution Abatement Equipment (including two maintenance trips); Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) - Hygiene supplies, soap, shampoos for Oil Platforms (OPLAT), Meals, Ready-to-Eat (MREs), etc.



8. CBS 3.1 - Training 6,864 9,009 284 9,293

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with tyraining tropps and personnel during the contingency operation. With the stand-up of Naval Expeditionary Combat Command units, this request includes supporting training.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the incremental cost to operate units, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Navy request includes:c orrective maintenace and fuel works up in support of GWOT. Assault Craft Unit One (ACU1): Repair parts and consumables. – First Naval Construction Division (1NCD): Force Protection (Convoy Security / Tactical Movement Team); Repair components and parts for equipment maintanance support.


10. CBS 3.3 – Other Supplies and Equipment 96,165 85,264 1,914 87,178 1,214 86,478

a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes: Night vision camera kits, field survival equipment, tapes, batteries – Commander Naval Surface Forces Pacific (CNSP): Beachmaster Unit One (BMU1): Generator, Repair Kits, Tents, Contingency exercise Box for deployed teams. – First Naval Construction Division (1NCD): Repair Parts and Consumables for other equipment requirements for Naval Construction Force Operational (NCF OP) Forces; equipment/vehicle leases; Joint Focres Command (JFCOM) Equipment and supplies purchases to conduct mission rehearsal exercises; special gears, hydrastorm, back packs&water sacks, special ops gogles & other equipments; video tape stocks, CD-R's, DVD-R's, computer diskettes, batteries, video and computer cables, specialized printer inks, specialized printing papers, digital multi-media cards, gaffers tapes.

b. Revisesd Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements with a reduction of $0.7M for classified programs. 11. CBS 3.4 – Facilities/Base Support 10,776 7,809 1,532 9,341

a. Narrative Justification: Includes items such as: CONUS & Hawaii regional GWOT related security guard contracts to replace military guards deployed to Iraq; support for security guard asessments, outsourcing surveys, waiver requests, exercises, and evaluation. Navy request also includes: Assault Craft Unit Five (ACU5): Facilities costs for Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) Craft. Central Command Regional Intelligence Exchange System (CENTRIX) network Engg, cranes, forklifts, Integrated Condition Assessment System (ICAS) for Embassy, general broadcasting Service maintenance, cable for Communication,Building Renovate; Video Teleconference (VTC), Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) Satelite lease and maintenance, network, Federal Express (FEDEX); utilities, real estate leases, International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS).

12. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 101,992 0 257,138 257,138

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activities performed at the organizational/unit level. Includes the cost to clean, inspect, and maintain oraganic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

13. CBS 3.6 – C4I 21,593 14,821 39,107 53,928 5,872 20,693

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations. Navy request includes: Tactical Communication Sustainment for Naval Construction Force Operational (NCF OP) Forces; Scan Eagle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Support in support of Operation Enduring Freedom – Phillipines (OEF-P); Automatic Identification System (AIS) equipment/comm links/mobile phones.

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements of $33.235M for classified programs.


14. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 75,186 30,185 10,551 40,736 3,551 33,736

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: Funding for the support of mission reheasal contractor support; sustainment of current subject matter expert contractor support (personnel recovery technology integration, training and education, Personnel Recovery Mission Software (PRMS); Linguist contract, computer & internet, civilian consultants, maintenance small equip, technical equipment services , small purchase contracts, Maritime Intercept Operation (MIO) operational cost, Command Task Force One-Fifty (CTF150) coalition forces cost; support provided to lease warehouse space in Bahrain to house Pollution Abatement Equipment.

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements with a reduction of $7.0M for classified programs. 15. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 434,808 0 564,395 564,395

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by air either by commercial or military assets. (Note: Navy is responsible for Marine Corps personnel and equipment transportation to and from operating destinations, and tactical air sustainment while in-theater. Marine Corps is responsible for all ground transportation while in-theater.)

16. CBS 4.2 - Sealift 0 0 1,203 1,203

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by sea either by commercial or military assets.

17. CBS 4.4 – Port Handling/Inland Transportation 1,671 0 3,171 3,171

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by sea either by commercial or military assets.

18. CBS 4.5 – Other Transportation 2,826 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland tranportation. Navy request includes items such as Mat'l to Southwest Asia (SWA), Fujayrah trucking, intra airlift, vehicle rental and small boat use for Vigilant Mariner (escort security personnel aboard Maritime Support Command ships); Shipping material to Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) Craft; shipping to 5th Fleet Area of Operations (AOR). Commander Pacific Fleet (CPF): Transportation of Things (TOT) Marine Equip - 1NCD: TAC Charges.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 933,155 281,800 1,276,814 1,558,614 1,235,379 1,517,179




Activity Group 1C Detail by Subactivity Group 1C7C Equipment Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: This funding provides maintenance and engineering technical support for Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) equipment including marine gas turbines, command and control equipment, equipment calibration, ground support equipment, aerial targets and cameras and mine countermeasures equipment. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C7C Equipment Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 8,491 8,491 a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget and FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 2. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 47,988 0 500 500

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Major equipment repair effort completed in FY 2006, and will begin another cycle anticipated in FY 2008.





Activity Group 1D Detail by Subactivity Group 1D3D In-service Weapons Systems Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding for this program provides maintenance engineering support services for aviation, undersea and surface weapons systems. Weapons systems supported include: Major gun weapons and gun fire control systems, surface/undersea/aviation anti-submarine warfare (ASW) systems, mine warfare systems and data processors. This program also provides safety support, readiness assessments and operational evaluations for these weapons systems. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1D3D In-service Weapons Systems Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 9 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification:

2. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 0 0 109 109





a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers.





Activity Group 1D Detail by Subactivity Group 1D4D Weapons Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding for this program provides depot level maintenance and overhaul for missile systems, rockets, gun systems and surface/undersea/aviation and anti-submarine warfare (ASW) systems. Ammunition and ordnance rework and certification are also performed in this program. Funding is also provided for maintenance of electronic components, data processors and guidance systems that are integral with weapons systems operations. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1D4D Weapons Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 6,671 6,671



a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the intermediate level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.





Activity Group 1D Detail by Subactivity Group 1D7D Other Weapons System Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding is required to support and maintain the infrastructure for the Joint Warfare Analysis Center (JWAC) to accomplish its Command mission and charter. This includes the command civilian salaries (to include performance awards, recruitment bonuses, and overtime); Automated Information Systems hardware, software and maintenance; Host Tenant services (to include utilities, facility and ground maintenance etc); traditional command level ceremonies, functions, and conferences; health and wellness program; command travel and training; general purchases; library services; and the operation of support systems for searching, storing, and retrieving national intelligence imagery and information. Also included is the operational planning support to integrate products and responses into Combatant Commanders (COCOM) operational planning; support to peacetime exercises; and COCOM support teams to forward deploy to a COCOM/Joint Force Commander’s headquarters in support of contingency planning with associated deployable gear. Funding is also included in this Sub-Activity Group in support of Navy Systems Management Activity (NSMA) Classified Programs. Accordingly, the details specific to these programs are held at a higher classification. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1D7D Weapons Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 463 463

b. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 0 463 463



Operation and Maintenance, Navy Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1

Detail by Subactivity Group BSM1 Facilities Sustainment, Restor and Modernization (FSRM)

I. Description of Operations Financed: Facility Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM), and Demolition includes funding for shore activities that support ship, aviation, combat operations and weapons support operating forces. FSRM funding provides maintenance, repair, and minor construction for all buildings, structures, grounds and utility systems to permit assigned forces and tenants to perform their mission. The major elements of the program include recurring day-to-day scheduled maintenance and emergency service work needed to preserve facilities; major and minor repairs needed to put existing facilities in adequate condition; and minor construction, which includes the addition to or alteration of existing facilities. Funding in this request is necessary based on the increased wear and tear at facilities or additional force protection resulting GWOT requirements. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group BSM1 FSRM Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 18,998 18,998


2. CBS 3.4 – Facilities/Base Support 44,426 0 8,667 8,667

a. Narrative Justification: Include items such as: Repair Naval Weapons Station (NWS) Earle ordnance roads in the magazine areas used to transpost ordnance to the waterfront area for shipboard loading. Repair Normandy Road that connects NWS Earle mainside magazine areas with the waterfront pier area used for ship loading; replace/repair marine mammal pier & pens Naval Base (NB) Pt Loma. Repair Sigonella & Naples perimeter fence; Re-configure Naples Main & Capodichino West Gate w/ vehicle barrier system, passive anti-ram barriers, etc.




Operation and Maintenance, Navy Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1

Detail by Subactivity Group BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS)

I. Description of Operations Financed: Base Operations Support includes funding for shore activities that support ship, aviation, combat operations and weapons support operating forces. Base Support includes port and airfield operations, operation of utility systems, public works services, base administration, supply operations, and base services such as transportation, environmental and hazardous waste management, security, personnel support functions, bachelor quarters operations, morale, welfare and recreation operations, and disability compensation. Starting in FY 2007, the Navy became executive agent for Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA), assuming control of all base management functions in Djibouti from the Marine Corps. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group BSS1 Base Operating Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 0 0 198 198

a. Narrative Justification: Additional security force and administration. 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 2,547 2,547


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan; Temporarily Assigned Duty (TAD) for backshop support to Camp Lemonier, Djibouti; Military working dog (MWD) team TAD/Travel; Master-at-arms TAD/travel to Afghanistan.

4. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 1,539 0 2,311 2,311

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.



6. CBS 3.4 – Facilities/Base Support 282,624 104,190 364,006 468,196

a. Narrative Justification: Includes Navy responsibilities as Executive Agent for Joint Task Force Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA) ($200 million). Also includes items such as: CONUS & Hawaii regional GWOT related security guard contracts to backfill military guards deployed to CENTCOM; support for security guard asessments, outsourcing surveys, waiver requests, exercises, and evaluation.




Activity Group 2A Detail by Subactivity Group 2A1F Ship Prepositioning and Surge

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Navy’s Sealift Program provides the worldwide capability to deploy combat forces and/or supporting material that may be required to meet national contingency objectives. The program is divided into two functional areas: (1) Prepositioned assets and (2) Surge assets. The Maritime Prepositioning Force is the foundation of the Navy’s prepositioned assets. Three squadrons of Maritime Prepositioning Ships (MPS) are forward deployed in support of Commander, Pacific Command, Commander, Central Command and Commander, European Command. Each squadron is able to provide 30 days of over-the-shore support to a Marine Air-Ground Task Force or Brigade equivalent. Causeway/ferry units (Naval Support Elements) are essential components of MPS squadrons since a developed/undamaged port facility may not always be available (or tactically located). Surge assets are maintained in a high state of readiness at U.S. ports. These ships can be manned, loaded, and underway within days of being called into service. The eight Fast Sealift Ships (FSS) are high-speed container ships converted to roll-on/roll-off capability for transport of combat equipment. Two Hospital Ships (T-AH) have the capability to conduct medical casualty treatment afloat, each providing 12 operating rooms and 1,000 beds. Two Aviation Maintenance and Support Ships (T-AVB) carry intermediate maintenance activity assets and spare parts for USMC airplanes and helicopters. Three Maritime Prepositioned Force (Enhanced) (MPF(E)) ships provide increased capability by carrying a fleet hospital, expeditionary airfield, naval mobile construction battalion support, and additional sustainment cargo. The National Defense Sealift Fund provides funding to maintain the Reduced Operating Status (ROS) readiness of the FSSs, T-AHs, and T-AVBs and fund maintenance and repair costs. This program also provides support for various sea lift programs, including Sealift Enhancement Feature upgrades, Naval Control of Shipping Command Post exercises, Merchant Cargo Delivery System training and exercises, Force Protection for delivery ships against chemical, biological, and radiological threats, Cargo Afloat Rig Team training, alternating coast exercises, and the Offshore Petroleum Discharge System (OPDS). II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group2A1F Ship Prepositioning and Surge Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 0 0 74 74








a. Narrative Justification: Includes the incremental cost to operate units that conduct or support OIF, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies Increase due largely to a combination of Maritime Pre-Positioning as well as hospital ship deployments to support Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).



6. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 3.4 0 0 61 61

a. Narrative Justification: Includes leases, rents and utilities to operate relief centers established to support the contingency operation. 7. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 6,648 0 8,769 8,769

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Support of USNS Comfort deployment for OEF.

9. CBS 4.4 – Port Handling/Inland Transportation 0 0 3,000 3,000

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland tranportation. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 172,076 2,300 162,761 165,061




Activity Group 2C Detail by Subactivity Group 2C1H Fleet Hospital Program

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Fleet Hospital Program provides comprehensive medical support to U.S. and allied forces in the event of contingency operations. These scalable, modular, rapidly erectable Expeditionary Medical Facilities (EMFs) are prepositioned throughout the world and complement and expand the organic medical capabilities of the fleet, while playing a critical role in the Marine Corps’ evolving warfighting strategies in forward deployed theater operations. The EMFs are composed of distinct capability based modules/packages which can be tailored to meet whatever mission is required. These medical and surgical facilities provide the ability to stabilize, treat, and rehabilitate wounded troops. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 2C1H Fleet Hospital Program Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 595 595

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment. 2. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 2,354 0 7,308 7,308

a. Narrative Justification: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the organizational level, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Costs are to support deployment and reset of Naval Medical facilities that deploy on a rotational basis to GWOT Areas of Operation (AORs).





Activity Group 3A Detail by Subactivity Group 3A1J Officer Acquisition

I. Description of Operations Financed: Officer Acquisition programs provide military training and indoctrination for officer candidates as part of a college curriculum or post-baccalaureate program, and preparatory training for selection for such an accession program. Officer accession programs include the Naval Academy, Officer Candidate School (OCS), the Merchant Marine Reserve (MMR) program, the Seaman to Admiral 21 Program and three preparatory programs: the Naval Academy Preparatory School (NAPS), the Broadened Opportunity for Officer Selection and Training (BOOST), and the Naval Science Institute. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 3A1J Fleet Officer Acquisition Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 71 71

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 0 71 71




Detail by Subactivity Group 3B1K Specialized Skill Training

I. Description of Operations Financed: Specialized Skill Training resources are used to maintain a trained force of personnel able to man and support surface, sub-surface, and aviation operating forces and their installed complex weapons systems. Utilized to train Naval Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) personnel and Individual Augmentee personnel being deployed in support of contingency operations. Enlisted personnel receive broad career-field and Naval Enlisted Classification (NEC) ratings upon completion of initial and advanced training programs in areas such as general skill, intelligence, cryptologic/signals and nuclear power operation. Costs for Specialized Skill Training include civilian labor, travel, supplies, material and contractor training and costs. The cost of Temporary Duty Under Instruction (TEMDUINS), the per diem associated with less than twenty weeks training required en route from one duty station to another, is also funded in Specialized Skill Training. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 3B1K Specialized Skill Training Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 3,214 3,214


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan; expenses related to billet specific training enroute PCS. Specific billets include Navy officers and enlisted personnel training for ground operations as well as staff training for Individual Augmentee (IA) personnel deploying to GWOT theaters.


a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment. 4. CBS 3.1 - Training 27,052 4,900 31,350 36,250

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with tyraining tropps and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: preparing sailors to go over to Central Command (CENTCOM); Individual Augmentee Combat Training/Riverine/Peacetime Detention and Hostage Survival (PDAHS) & Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape (SERE)/Vertical Boarding Search and Seizure (VBSS)/Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO); Shipboard Electronmagnetic Capability Improvement Program (SEMCIP) Training program - developing course materials for electromagnetic interference (EMI) Control and Spectrum training.



NAVY


Budget Activity 3 Activity Group 3B

Detail by Subactivity Group 3B2K Flight Training

I. Description of Operations Financed: Flight Training provides for undergraduate pilot and flight officer training and other flight training functions such as flight surgeons, Naval Academy and ROTC midshipmen orientation, and test pilot-transition training. Flight operations costs consist of fuel consumed, flight gear issued, part and material support for organizational and intermediate maintenance, aviation depot level repairables, and contractor services for maintenance of training aircraft. Flight hours for each fiscal year are calculated based upon output required for each phase of the training which will result in completion of undergraduate pilot and flight officer training rates prescribed by the Chief of Naval Operations. Similar to the Fleets’ flying hour program, the flight training program is analyzed on a cost per flight hour basis by type/model/series of aircraft. Other funding for Flight Training provides for operation of the Naval Aircrew Candidate School, the Rescue Swimmers School, and flight support. Funds for flight support include academic training, contractor maintenance of training simulators, contract refueling operations, consumable supplies, civilian salaries, and operation of the Training Air Wings. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 3B2K Specialized Skill Training Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 8,656 8,656

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 0 8,656 8,656




Activity Group 3C Detail by Subactivity Group 3C1L Recruiting and Advertising

I. Description of Operations Financed: Recruiting and Advertising activities provide for the operation and maintenance costs necessary to recruit men and women for enlisted , officer candidate, and officer status in the regular and active duty reserve components of the Navy. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 3C1L Recruiting and Advertising Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 1,152 1,152

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 0 1,152 1,152




Activity Group 4A Detail by Subactivity Group 4A1M Administration

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Secretary of the Navy staff serves as the principal policy advisors and assistants in the administration of the affairs of the Department of the Navy. The Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) staff advises and assists the Chief of Naval Operations in the discharge of his responsibilities as the principle naval advisor and naval executive to the Secretary of the Navy on the conduct of the activities of the Department of the Navy, and as the Navy member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The OPNAV Support Activity performs functions of an operational nature that support the Chief of Naval Operations Staff Offices. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A1M Administration Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 127 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 299 299


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan and travel to support Naval Station Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) operations.






a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes office supplies and other misc support costs.



a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: Linguist Contract to Support Detainee Communications.





Activity Group 4A Detail by Subactivity Group 4A2M External Relations

I. Description of Operations Financed: External Relations and Public Affairs is a function that covers all responsibility for contacts with the public and the effect of these contacts on the Navy, evaluation and consideration of public opinion and its role in formulating and administering public policy, and dissemination of information about the Navy in the United States and overseas. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A2M External Relations Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 83 83



a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes camera equipment and associated consumable supplies for Chief of Naval Information (CHINFO).

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 325 0 98 98




Activity Group 4A Detail by Subactivity Group 4A4M Military Manpower/Personnel Mgt

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Navy Manpower Analysis Center (NAVMAC) develops manpower requirements documents for individual ships, aircraft squadrons and shore activities. The Enlisted Personnel Management Center (EPMAC) provides centralized management support for the distribution of active duty enlisted personnel. The Navy Personnel Evaluation Boards conduct hearings and present reports concerning errors and injustices involving member and former members of the military which the Secretary may use to correct military records. Also funded are requirements of the Navy corrections Programs and enhances the Navy’s ability to manage and operate corrections facilities. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A4M Military Manpower/Personnel Mgt Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 239 239


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Iraq/ Kuwait such as Commander Naval Forces Pacific (CNP) and the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (MCPON) staff travel.

3. CBS 2.5 – Other Personnel Support 1,201 1,000 219 1,219

a. Narrative Justification: Other personnel support costs not included above such as permanent change of station, end of term of service, or special actions associated with houshold goods or privately-owned vehicle storage. Navy request includes items such as: Navy Marine Corps Mobilization Processing System - a web based system that provides automatic workflow processing and tracking of Contingency Operational Augmentation requests.









Activity Group 4A Detail by Subactivity Group 4A5M Other Personnel Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Legal Services Support Group provides the Navy’s senior-level officials with advice and counsel on issues such as environmental law, real estate, base closure, and handles all suspension and debarment actions against government contractors for the General Counsel. Navy Legal Services Offices and detachments provide legal services and counsel concerning command legal matters including, but not limited to, military justice, conducting investigations, adjudicating claims, and providing legal assistance. The Judge Advocate General-Field Offices provide legal support concerning military and administrative law. The Navy Claims program provides the resources necessary for the payment of the non-contractual claims against the Department of the Navy (DON). The Naval Safety Center promotes and monitors safety to reduce the incidence of accidents afloat and ashore. The Armed Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) provides news, command information, and entertainment programming aboard ship and overseas as part of the Navy’s effort to enhance combat effectiveness and retention by improving morale. The Naval Media Center (NMC) provides visual information products and services for Navy and other users worldwide and designs, procures, operates, and maintains production and broadcast systems and equipment for Navy operated AFRTS outlets worldwide. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A5M Other Personnel Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 137 137


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel in support of Naval Media Center (NMC) TV Show, Daily News Update (DNU), and All Hands Magazine GWOT Special Publication; Bedside Travel: Funds family member visits to those seriously ill/injured. Funeral Travel: Funds family member travel to funerals of Navy personnel.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes 10 additional Casualty Assistance Case Managers/workers to handle the increasing amount of cases as a result of GWOT.




5. CBS 2.6 – Rest and Recreation 0 0 1,000 1,000

a. Narrative Justification: Includes deployment Morale, Welfare and Recreation services funding for operational theaters. 6. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 295 295



a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes office supplies and other misc support costs.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes informational spots and communications for the Naval Media Center.





Activity Group 4A Detail by Subactivity Group 4A6M Servicewide Communications

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Servicewide Communications program provides funding for communication systems, which support both fleet and shore establishments of the Navy. These systems include Electronic Command and Control systems, which provide command, control, readiness and intelligence information in direct support to Combatant Commanders. All leased communications costs, the operation of communications stations worldwide, and the management of both are also included in this subactivity group. Funding for Naval Network Warfare Command (NNWC) supports all aspects of the Command and Control Protect (C2P) functions of Information Security operations. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A6M Servicewide Communications Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 25,484 25,484

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment. 2. CBS 3.6 – C4I 24,359 18,000 46,605 64,605 46,005 64,005

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of analyzing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations. Navy request includes: support of Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems; Fleet System Engineering Team (FSET) experts deliver expertise necessary to maintain the Fleet; Long Haul Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET), Unclassified but Sensitive Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET), Defense Switched Network (DSN) to support personnel comms overseas & to CONUS. Increase due to Navy being assigned responsibility as Command Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA), as well as expanded long war responsibilities in theaters other than U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM).

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements with a reduction of $0.6M for classified programs. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 24,359 18,000 72,089 90,089 71,489 89,489




Detail by Subactivity Group 4B1N Servicewide Transportation

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Service-wide Transportation (SWT) program provides funding for the majority of the Navy’s worldwide cargo shipments. This includes First Destination Transportation (FDT), Second Destination Transportation (SDT), and continental United States terminal services in conjunction with cargo movements. FDT costs are associated with the movement of material, after purchase, on a Free-On Board basis, from the contractor’s facilities to the first point of use or storage. The SWT program also provides financing for the worldwide Second Destination shipment of regular and emergency readiness material including ammunition, chemicals, medicine, subsistence, mail, repair parts, and high value repairable items. The SWT program finances the purchase of transportation services predominately from DOD working capital fund transportation activities; the Air Mobility Command (AMC), Military Sealift Command (MSC), and the Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC). In addition, SWT purchases transportation services from private sector firms. Servicewide Transportation also reimburses the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) for OCONUS transportation of subsistence to Navy units and funds Navy’s share of SDDC’s Port Handling and Traffic Management bills. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4B1N Servicewide Transportation Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 67,863 66,200 123,372 189,572

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by air either by commercial or military assets. Increase over previos year appropriation due to increase in fuel costs for FY 2007.

2. CBS 4.2 – Sealift 41,616 0 70,639 70,639

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation of Navy and USMC personnel, equipment, and material by sea using commercial or active duty naval ships.

3. CBS 4.4 – Port Handling/Inland Transportation 652 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes port handling in previous years. FY 2007 incorporated into CBS 4.1. 4. CBS 4.5 – Other Transportation 41,563 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes tranportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland transportation. FY 2007 incorporated into CBS 4.1.

5. CBS 4.6 – Second Destination Transportation 29,521 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes tranportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland transportation. FY 2007 incorporated into CBS 4.1.





Detail by Subactivity Group 4B2N Planning, Engineering and Design

I. Description of Operations Financed: This sub-activity group provides funding for ship system acquisition studies and reports for the improvement of ship acquisition planning and ship construction projects. Planning and engineering support for Bachelor Quarters management, facilities, environmental compliance, hazard abatement, and materials technology. Specific costs include salaries, benefits, and administrative support for contracts personnel, engineering field divisions, space and electronic warfare programs, and related field activities. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4B2N Planning, Engineering and Design Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 0 0 3 3

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Iraq/ Kuwait.





Detail by Subactivity Group 4B3N Acquisition and Program Mgt

I. Description of Operations Financed: This sub activity group provides funding for salaries, administrative expenses, and travel for personnel involved in program management and logistics support for ship systems, space systems, material transportation, food service systems, fuel and petroleum support, and special support operations. Funding also supports the Navy International Programs Office. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4B3N Acquisition and Program Mgt Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 194 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes civilian pay costs such as overtime, hazard duty pay, etc. 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 193 193

b. Narrative Justification: FY 2007 expanded deployment costs in support of increased force posture. 3. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAD Funded Travel 305 0 311 311

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan.


a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget. 5. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 941 25,000 53,387 78,387

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Increase due to higher than anticipated management of Procurement (reset)-related issues.

6. CBS 4.5 – Other Transportation 68,100 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes transportation not included as airlift, sealift, ready reserve forces, or port handling/inland tranportation. Navy request includes items such as DOD bills (Over-Ocean Transporation, U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM)).





Detail by Subactivity Group 4B6N Combat Weapons Systems

I. Description of Operations Financed: This program provides engineering support for the Shipboard Electromagnetic Compatibility Improvement Program (SEMCIP), Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), and Total Ship Test/Production program. Logistics and technical support is provided for sensitive ordnance security, radiation control and health, standardization, quality evaluation, combat system integration, and testing and in-service engineering for multiple ship class combat system computer programs. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4B6N Combat Weapons Systems Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 0 240 240



a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes general administrative support equipment for Submarine Shipboard Electromagnetic Capability Improvement Program (SUB SEMCIP) which provides engineering services for immediate response to the increase in Fleet requests for resolution of emergent submarine electro-magnetic interference (EMI) problems.





Detail by Subactivity Group 4B7N Space and Electronic Warfare System

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Space and Electronic Warfare Systems sub-activity group provides technical and life-cycle support for Ocean Surveillance and other electronic programs. Meteorological support includes site preparation for installation of new systems/equipment and contracted engineering and logistics support associated with new equipment/systems. Engineering and technical support is provided for electronic test and repair, maintenance engineering, cover and deception, electronic warfare, naval information programs, portable electronic support measures, the tactical electromagnetic program and electromagnetic compatibility programs. Logistics and technical support is funded for Navy Tactical Command Support Systems (NTCSS), Integrated Logistics Support, Submarine Integrated Communication System, Inspection and Survey Spare Parts Improvement, Safety, Marine Air Traffic Control Squadrons and Precise Time and Time Interval Maintenance Support. This sub-activity group also provides technical and life-cycle support for the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS), Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS), Command Control Processor, LINK 11 and LINK 16. Also included is In-Service Engineering Activity (ISEA) support of the Shipboard Cryptologic and Cryptologic Carry-on Program (CCOP). The Combat Survivor Evader Locator (CSEL) radio system provides U.S. combat forces with secure two-way, real-time data communications with precise geopositioning. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4B7N Space and Electronic Warfare System Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.6 – C4I 0 0 55 55

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: Submarine Shipboard Electromagnetic Capability Improvement Program (SUB SEMCIP) - provides engineering services for immediate response to the increase in Fleet requests for resolution of emergent submarine electro-magnetic interferrence (EMI) problems, as identified in Causalty Reports (CASREPs) and requests for Technical Assists.





Activity Group 4C Detail by Subactivity Group 4C0P Classified Programs

I. Description of Operations Financed: Classified programs in areas of signal intelligence, electronic warfare support measures, operation of special security communications, direction finding and exploitation of hostile command/control signals, detection/classification/tracking of platforms beyond radar range in support of weapons targeting and signal intelligence surveillance. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4C0P Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 1.2 – Civilian Pay 3,259 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: 2. CBS 2.0 – Personnel Support Costs 0 0 2,120 2,120


a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan; Polygraph Support, augmentees to the GITMO Office.



5. CBS 2.5 – Other Personnel Support 180 0 1,607 1,607

a. Narrative Justification: Other personnel support costs not included above such as permanent change-of-station, end of term of service, or special actions associated with household goods or privately-owned vehicle storage.

6. CBS 3.0 – Operating Support 0 33,331 36,814 70,145

a. Narrative Justification: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget. Also includes classified programs involving protecting installations, material, operations information and personnel from espinonage, and sabotaging other clandestine activities and terrorism.


7. CBS 3.1 - Training 1,868 0 43,109 43,109 1,194 1,194

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with training troops and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request consists of costs generated by incremental pre-deployment training for classified operational tasking.

b. Revised Narrative Justification: This request includes re-priorizated requirements with a reduction of $41.915M for classified programs.

8. CBS 3.3 – Other Supplies and Equipment 9,724 0 3,388 3,388

a. Narrative Justification: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes Equipment Replacement-Polygraph Machines, Etc.


a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: imagery collection management and support services for classified requirements.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 34,575 33,331 106,962 140,293 65,047 98,378




Activity Group 4C Detail by Subactivity Group 4C1P

I. Description of Operations Financed: Classified programs in areas of signal intelligence, electronic warfare support measures, operation of special security communications, direction finding and exploitation of hostile command/control signals, detection/classification/tracking of platforms beyond radar range in support of weapons targeting and signal intelligence surveillance. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4C1P Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.2 – Operations OPTEMPO 0 5,227 3,654 8,881

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with training troops and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request consists of costs generated by incremental predeployment training.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 5,227 3,654 8,881

Exhibit O-1 (GWOT/RWOT Summary of Operations) (Page 1 of 2)

Department of the Navy FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request Operations and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

O-1 Line Item Summary (Dollars in Thousands)

O-1 Line Item

Number Budget Activity

Sub-Activity Group

Sub-Activity Group Name FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

FY 2007 Title IX


FY 2007 Total

Estimate

010 01 1A1A Mission & Other Flight Operations 110,848 8,036 43,601 51,637 020 01 1A3A Intermediate Maintenance 0 0 9,110 9,110 040 01 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance 4,910 0 0 0 050 01 1A6A Aircraft Depot Operations Support 1,395 0 0 0 060 01 1B1B Mission & Other Ship Operations 7,939 0 22,151 22,151 080 01 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance 5,251 0 0 0 100 01 1C1C Combat Communications 0 1,850 1,170 3,020 110 01 1C6C Combat Support Forces 0 0 29,000 29,000 130 01 BSM1 Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Mod

(FSRM) 125 0 0 0

140 01 BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS) 3,753 0 6,034 6,034 180 04 4A5M Other Personnel Support 0 0 0 0 000 04 4C0P Security Programs 58,251 0 0 0


192,472 9,886 111,066 120,952

Exhibit O-1 (GWOT/RWOT Summary of Operations) (Page 2 of 2)

Department of the Navy Global War on Terror (GWOT/Regional War on Terror (RWOT)

Operations and Maintenance, Navy Reserve Summary of Operations

I. Description of Operations Financed: Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) include the Department of the Navy’s efforts for conducting stability and coalition support operations throughout Iraq, Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa, and other regions, as well as destroying terrorist training camps and infrastructure, capturing Hussein regime loyalists and Al Qaeda leaders, stopping terrorists activities, and preventing the re-emergence of international terrorist organizations. These objectives also include military-related reconstruction operations. Support costs include activation of Reserve personnel and units, increased fuel consumption and spare parts, additional maintenance to support higher usage of equipment, deployment of medical capabilities (hospital ships and deployable fleet hospitals), extended communications and intelligence support, and related transportation costs. Additionally, costs include the purchase of investment items lost, damaged, or in need of replacement resulting from increased “wear and tear” from higher operating tempos. II. Force Structure Summary: The continued deployment of approximately12,500 Navy personnel (9,000 Navy personnel as part of OIF and 3,500 Navy personnel as part of OEF Afghanistan and other areas) to support conventional and irregular ground operations (boots on the ground – BOG), to include approximately 5,200 reserve military personnel and civilians during FY 2007 supporting these contingency operation, including a planned rotation of forces. Additionally, Navy ships in the area will increase the total average number of Navy personnel in theater to approximately 20,000, as carrier striking groups / expeditionary striking groups move in and out of the areas of operations. Also included are reserve military personnel not in-theater who are either being called up, demobilized, retained in a medical hold status, or providing other contingency operation support.

Types of Forces FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

Ships 95 82Aircraft 367 309Tanks, Combat Vehicles Support Vehicles Ground Combat Forces Ground Support Forces 8,500 12,500Other Forces

Personnel FY 2006 Average Deployed

FY 2007 Average Deployed

Active 27,119 32,519Reserve 5,297 5,174Guard Totals 32,416 37,693


OP-5 OMNR Exhibits by BA/SAG 1A1A Mission and Other Flight Ops 2 1A3A Aircraft Intermediate maintenance 3 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance 4 1A6A Aircraft Depot Operations Support 5 1B1B Mission and Other Ship Ops 6 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance 8 1C1C Combat Communications 9 1C6C Combat Support Forces 10 BSMR Facilities Sustain., Restor and Mod (FSRM) 13 BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS) 14 BSSR Base Operating Support (BOS) 15 4A5M Other Personnel Support 16 4C0P Classified Programs 17 **FY06 Actuals include fuel pricing adjustments funded in FY06 supplementals


NAVY FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request Operation and Maintenance, Navy, Reserve


Detail by Subactivity Group 1A1A Mission and Other Flight Ops

I. Description of Operations Financed: Mission and Other Flight Operations includes all Navy and Marine Corps Tactical Air (TACAIR) and Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) forces, shore-based fleet air support, operational testing and evaluation, operation and maintenance of White House helicopters, and miscellaneous items such as transportation of squadron equipment and personnel travel/Temporary Active Duty (TAD) during deployment workups. Funding provides flying hours to maintain an adequate level of readiness enabling Navy and Marine Corps aviation forces to perform their primary mission as required in support of national objectives. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A1A: Mission and Other Flight Ops Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAC Funded Travel 7,913 0 5,535 5,535

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in AFghanistan; DPRGP (Director Patrol Reconnaissance Group Pacific) & CVWP (COMVAQWINGPAC); DPRGP/CFWP/AIR AMBULANCE - HSC21/25/USMC; DIRPATRECONFORPAC & COMFAIRWESTPAC. Funds aircrew, aviation maintenance, and flight operations personnel. Examples of items covered are per diem, rental vehicles, billeting.

2. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 630 0 4,332 4,332

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes CVWP supplies – Chemical Defense Uniforms (CDUs) and Inclement Weather Clothing.


a. Narrative Justitifcation: Incremental cost of flying hours above baseline supporting the GWOT, plus materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies, etc. Decrease for 2007 due to reduced Navy Reserve presense for this Fiscal Year.

4. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 331 0 236 236

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes transportaion of Navy personnel, equipment, and material by air either by commercial or military assets. Examples include AMC SAAM airlifts & movements of retrograde shipments.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Estimate Total 110,849 8,036 43,601 51,637




Detail by Subactivity Group 1A3A Aircraft Intermediate maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: This program provides formal and on-the-job training to aviation maintenance personnel at the organizational and intermediate levels of maintenance by Navy Engineering Technical Service/Contractor Engineering Technical Service (NETS/CETS) personnel. The purpose of the training is to elevate the technical knowledge and skills of active Navy and Marine aviation maintenance technicians in the troubleshooting, installation, maintenance, repair, and operation of all types of aviation equipment and associated support equipment. In addition, this sub-activity group provides the equipment and supplies necessary to run Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department (AIMD) sites on a day-to-day basis, including travel for military personnel at the AIMDs to support overseas detachments. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A3A: Intermediate Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 0 0 18 18

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.


a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes supplies & equip for AIMD deployments.

3. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Contracts 0 0 9,000 9,000

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Increased utilization of Reserve aviation assets has caused Intermediate Maintenance costs to rise for FY 2007.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Totals 0 0 9,110 9,110




Detail by Subactivity Group 1A5A Aircraft Depot Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Aircraft Depot Maintenance program provides for Airframe, Engine and Component rework to meet established Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) readiness goals. The goals are:

1. Airframe Rework: maintain deployed and work-up squadrons at a 100% Primary Aircraft Authorization (PAA) and non-deployed squadrons at 90% of PAA.

2. Engine Rework: maintain a net Ready-for-Issue (RFI) engine/module spares pool at 90% of authorized levels and zero bare firewalls. A. Airframe Rework - This program provides for the inspection, rework, and emergent repairs of fleet aircraft. Through periodic depot level maintenance, aircraft major structures and airframe systems are maintained in a safe, flyable condition. The Aircraft Service Period Adjustment (ASPA) Program adjusts individual aircraft period end dates for selected aircraft when material condition warrants. Under ASPA guidelines, only aircraft that, upon inspection, cannot safely be extended for another 12-month tour are inducted in the depot for Standard Depot Level Maintenance (SDLM). Depot maintenance is currently being performed under both the SDLM and Integrated Maintenance Concept (IMC) programs. Currently, the E-2, E-6, EA-6B, F/A-18, H-1, H-46, H-53, H-60, C-130, P-3, AV-8B, C-2, and S-3 aircraft programs have been incorporated under the IMC concept. The IMC concept uses Planned Maintenance Intervals (PMI), performing more frequent depot maintenance with smaller work packages, and reducing out of service time. The goal of this program is to improve readiness while reducing operating and support costs. B. Engine Rework - The engine rework program accomplishes the repair, modification and overhaul of aircraft engines, gearboxes, and torque meters. The program objective is to return depot-repairable engines to Ready-for-Issue (RFI) status to support fleet engine pool requirements. Under the Engine Analytical Maintenance Program (EAMP), engines are repaired at the lowest echelon of maintenance possible. Only engines that are beyond the repair capability of intermediate maintenance activities are scheduled for induction in the depots. C. Components - The Component Repair Program supports the depot level repair of aeronautical components for the aircraft systems and equipment under Contractor Logistics Support (CLS). CLS support is provided for weapon systems and equipment that will be commercially supported for the life-of-type, and special programs and projects that do not have material support date (MSD) established. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A5A: Aircraft Depot Maintenance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 4,910 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Examples include: KC-130J Increased Power by the Hour, Engine Depot Maintenance and Aircraft Depot Maintenance.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 4,910 0 0 0


NAVY

FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request Operation and Maintenance, Navy, Reserve


Detail by Subactivity Group 1A6A Aircraft Depot Operations Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: Support Services – This program provides unscheduled services to the fleet. The services are budgeted on the basis of historical level of effort and projected emergent requirements. This program enhances fleet readiness by providing expeditious solutions for the correction of unplanned maintenance problems incurred during fleet operations. Services include salvage of material, fleet maintenance training, customer service, preservation and depreservation, acceptance and transfer of aircraft, and support of depot maintenance operations. Depot Industrial Support – Funds NAVAIR Headquarters Depot Operations salary and support for personnel responsible for management and oversight of the Naval Air Depots. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1A6A: Aircraft Depot Operations Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 1,395 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Examples include: Engine Depot Maintenance and EA-6B Aircraft Depot Maintenance.





Detail by Subactivity Group 1B1B (Mission and Other Ship Ops)

I. Description of Operations Financed: This sub-activity group provides resources for all aspects of ship operations required to continuously deploy combat ready warships and supporting forces in support of national objectives. Programs supported include operating tempo (OPTEMPO), fleet and unit training, operational support such as command and control, pier side support and port services, organizational maintenance, and associated administrative & other support. Costs consist of distillate fuel to support OPTEMPO underway days per quarter, organizational level repairs, supplies and equipage (S&E), utilities costs, TAD for shipboard and afloat staff personnel, nuclear propulsion fuel consumption and processing costs, and charter of leaseback units through the Military Sealift Command (MSC). II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B1B: Mission and Other Ship Ops Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAC Funded Travel 46 0 47 47

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan and Commander Seventh Fleet (C7F): Joint Task Force Five Fifteen (JTF 515; extended maritime interdiction operations in the Phillipines) Support Stockham travel TAD for Afloat Training Group (ATG)/Others to support Joint Special Operations Task Force – Phillipines (JSOTF-P), JTF-515 and Phillipines. Also includes travel to support Fly Away Teams to support submarines in the Central Command (CENTCOM) Area of Operations (AOR).


a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not alreadyissued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.


a. Narrative Justitifcation: Baseline fuel pricing adjustment related to higher fuel prices not included in FY 2007 appropriated budget.


4. CBS 3.2 – Operations OPTEMPO 7,661 0 2,428 2,428

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the incremental cost to operate units that conduct or support OIF, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Navy request includes items such as: Combat Systems Equipment Inspections and Repairs - Support additional costs related combat systems repairs, such as Combat System Operability Testing and Combat Systems Review Analysis (CSPAT/CSRA) costs; readiness requirements needed to support a deployment ready/surge capable force.

5. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 13 0 12 12

a. Narrative Justitifcation: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the organizational level, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

6. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Equipment 135 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: port costs for Forward Deployed Naval Forces/Expanded Maritime Intercept Operation (FDNF/EMIO) ships, leased equipment and services in foreign ports - CT (COUNTER -TERRORISM).





Detail by Subactivity Group 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance

I. Description of Operations Financed: Financing within this program supports maintenance ranging from Overhauls (OH) to Restricted Technical Availabilities (RA/TA) performed at Naval Shipyards (public) or private shipyards. Ship overhauls restore the ship, including all operating systems that affect safety or current combat capability, to established performance standards. This includes the correction of all discrepancies found during pre-overhaul tests and inspections or developed from maintenance history analysis. RA/TA repairs include selected restricted availabilities, phased maintenance availabilities, emergent repairs, service craft overhauls, repairs during post-shakedown of new units, interim dry docking, battery renewals and various miscellaneous type repairs. Non-depot/Intermediate Maintenance supports fleet maintenance performed by Navy personnel and civilians on tenders, repair ships, aircraft carriers, Shore Intermediate Maintenance Activities (SIMAs) and Naval Submarine Support Facility (NSSF) New London. The SIMA program funds the pay of civilian personnel, materials and day-to-day operations at the SIMAs. Naval Submarine Support Facility (NSSF) New London provides intermediate level maintenance, ordnance, and supply support to nuclear attack submarines, support vessels and service craft. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1B4B: Ship Depot Maintnance Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 5,251 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: The cost of equipment maintenance activites performed at the depot level facility, to include the cost to overhaul, clean, inspect, and maintain organic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. In previous years, ship depot maintenance was not broken out between contingency operations. No appropriation for Reserve force ships due to no units being scheduled for depot level maintenance in FY 2007.




Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1C

Detail by Subactivity Group 1C1C Combat Communications

I. Description of Operations Financed: Funding provides for communications systems that directly support fleet operations. The Naval Network and Space Operations Command operates and maintains space systems (spacecraft and ground-based components) to fulfill Naval and national requirements. Additional programs supported are Electronic Command and Control Systems including Anti-Submarine Warfare Operations Centers (ASWOCs), Operation Support System (OSS), Navy Tactical Command Systems Afloat (NTCSA), Global Command and Control System (GCCS), Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), Navigation System Management, Ring Laser Gyro Navigator (RLGN) and Joint Maritime Command Information Systems (JMCIS) (ashore, tactical/mobile and afloat). The Follow-On Satellite Program supports the Fleet satellite constellation and provides reliable communication links among Navy forces with EHF, UHF and SHF capabilities. The Mobile Ashore Support Terminal (MAST) is a self-contained portable C4I system that can be rapidly deployed to provide an initial C4I capability for a Naval Component Commander (NCC) for a Naval Liaison Detachment operating ashore. The Mobile Integrated Command Facility (MICFAC) is a complete mobile command center designed to support the NCC in Joint Operations. The AN/MSQ-126 Tactical Command System support is also funded in this budget line. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C1C: Combat Communications Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.2 – Operations OPTEMPO 0 1,850 1,170 3,020

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the incremental cost to operate units that conduct or support OIF, such as materials and services used during an operation to include: petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and spare and consumable parts such as repair components, kits, assemblies. Appropriation increase for FY 2007 due to deployment of Reserve components not participating in previous year operations.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 0 1,850 1,170 3,020




Detail by Subactivity Group 1C6C Combat Support Forces

I. Description of Operations Financed: This subactivity group includes funding to support ship environmental protection diving and salvage operations, fleet commands and staffs, ocean facilities program, fleet-wide imaging services, unified commands support, operations of Navy Mobile Construction Battalions (NMCB's), Amphibious Craft Units, Special Combat Support Forces, and repair of combatant craft. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 1C6C Combat Support Forces Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.1 – TDY/TAC Funded Travel 0 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the costs of travel, per diem, and lodging for military and civilian personnel that result from participation in or support to the contingency operation. Examples include travel costs to support operations in Afghanistan: Training teams to Forward Deployed Naval Forces (FDNF) to prep for surge operations.

2. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 0 0 24,957 24,957

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not alreadyissued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes $11M in body armor. Also includes organizational clothing/Initial Equipment for Combat Skills Warrior, Rapid Fielding Initiative Issues and Personally Procured Personal Protective Equipmentt OC/IE for large scale mobilization in support of GWOT.


3. CBS 2.3 – Medical Support / Health Services 0 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Additive costs associated with providing medical services to military and civilians in clinics, hospitals, hospital ships or other medical tratment facilities. Navy request includes: CNSP: ACU5: Recoup medical cost provided to deploying DETs. BMU-1 Medical supplies/EMT kits – First Naval Construction Division (1NCD): Battalion Medical/Consumables Authorized Medical Allowance Lists (AMAL)/ Authorized Dental Allowance Lists (ADALs); Naval Central Command (NAVCENT)-medical supplies for Commander Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) personnel located downrange.

4. CBS 3.1 - Training 0 0 956 956

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the costs associated with predeployment training of units and personnel to participate in or support an operation as well as the costs associated with tyraining tropps and personnel during the contingency operation. Navy request includes training to support stand-up of Naval Expeditionary Combat Command units.


a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain the forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Navy request includes: Night vision camera kits, field survival equipment, tapes, batteries – Commander Naval Surface Force Pacific (CNSP): Beachmaster Unit One (BMU1): Generator, Repair Kits, Tents, Connex Box for deployed teams. - 1NCD: Repair Parts and Consumables for other equipment requirements for NCF OP Forces; equipment/vehicle leases; JFCOM Equipment and supplies purchases to conduct mission rehearsal exercises; special gears, hydrastorm, back packs&water sacks, special ops gogles & other equipments; video tape stocks, CD-R's, DVD-R's, computer diskettes, batteries, video and computer cables, specialized printer inks, specialized printing papers, digital multi-media cards, gaffers tapes.

6. CBS 3.4 – Facilities / Base Support 0 0 13 13

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes items such as: CONUS & Hawaii regional GWOT related security guard contracts to replace military guards deployed to Iraq; support for security guard asessments, outsourcing surveys, waiver requests, exercises, and evaluation. Navy request also includes: Assault Craft Unit Five (ACU5): Facilities costs for Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) Craft. Central Command Regional Intelligence Exchange System (CENTRIX) network Engg, cranes, forklifts, Integrated Condition Assessment System (ICAS) for Embassy, general broadcasting Service maintenance, cable for Communication,Building Renovate; Video Teleconference (VTC), Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) Satelite lease and maintenance, network, Federal Express (FEDEX); utilities, real estate leases, International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS).

7. CBS 3.5 – Equipment Maintenance 0 0 17 17

a. Narrative Justitifcation: The cost of equipment maintenance activities performed at the organizational/unit level. Includes the cost to clean, inspect, and maintain oraganic equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment.

8. CBS 3.6 – C4I 0 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of designing, engineering, installing and maintaining C4I systems required to suppport the contingency operations. Navy request includes: Tactical Comm Sustainment for Naval Construction Force Operational (NCF OP) Forces; Automated Information System equipment/comm links/mobile phones.


9. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Equipment 0 0 883 883

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes the following: Funding for the support of mission reheasal contractor support; sustainment of current subject matter expert contractor support (personnel recovery technology integration, training and education, Personnel Recovery Mission Software (PRMS); Linguist contract, computer&internet, Civilian Consultant, Maint small equip, tech equip svcs, small purchase contracts, Maritime Intercept Operation (MIO) operational cost, Commander Task Force One-Fifty (CTF150) coalition forces cost; support provided to lease warehouse space in Bahrain to house Pollution Abatement Equipment.

10. CBS 4.2 - Sealift 0 0 2,036 2,036

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes transportation of Department of the Navy personnel, equipment, and material by sea either by commercial or military assets.




Budget Activity 1 Activity Group 1

Detail by Subactivity Group BSMR Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM)

I. Description of Operations Financed: Facility Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM), and Demolition includes funding for shore activities that support ship, aviation, combat operations and weapons support operating forces. FSRM funding provides maintenance, repair, and minor construction for all buildings, structures, grounds and utility systems to permit assigned forces and tenants to perform their mission. The major elements of the program include recurring day-to-day scheduled maintenance and emergency service work needed to preserve facilities; major and minor repairs needed to put existing facilities in adequate condition; and minor construction, which includes the addition to or alteration of existing facilities. Funding in this request is necessary based on the increased wear and tear at facilities or additional force protection resulting GWOT requirements. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group BSMR FSRM Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.4 – Facilities / Base Support 125 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: No FSRM applicable to Navy Reserves for FY 2007. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 125 0 0 0


FY 2007 Emergency Supplemental Request Operation and Maintenance, Navy, Reserve


Detail by Subactivity Group BSS1 Base Operating Support (BOS)

I. Description of Operations Financed: Base Operations Support includes funding for shore activities that support ship, aviation, combat operations and weapons support operating forces. Base Support includes port and airfield operations, operation of utility systems, public works services, base administration, supply operations, and base services such as transportation, environmental and hazardous waste management, security, personnel support functions, bachelor quarters operations, morale, welfare and recreation operations, and disability compensation. Starting in FY 2007, the Navy became executive agent for Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA), assuming control of all base management functions in Djibouti from the Marine Corps. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group BSS1 Base Operating Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 0 0 781 781

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation.

2. CBS 3.4 – Facilities / Base Support 0 0 5,253 5,253

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes Navy Reserve responsibilities as it applies to active Navy’s role as Executive Agent for Joint Task Force Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA). .





Detail by Subactivity Group BSSR Base Operating Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: Base Operations Support includes funding for shore activities that support ship, aviation, combat operations and weapons support operating forces. Base Support includes port and airfield operations, operation of utility systems, public works services, base administration, supply operations, and base services such as transportation, environmental and hazardous waste management, security, personnel support functions, bachelor quarters operations, morale, welfare and recreation operations, and disability compensation. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group BSSR Base Operating Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 3.4 – Facilities / Base Support 3,753 0 0 0

b. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes Navy responsibilities as Executive Agent for Joint Task Force Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA). FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total 3,753 0 0 0




Detail by Subactivity Group 4A5M Other Personnel Support

I. Description of Operations Financed: The Legal Services Support Group provides the Navy’s senior-level officials with advice and counsel on issues such as environmental law, real estate, base closure, and handles all suspension and debarment actions against government contractors for the General Counsel. Navy Legal Services Offices and detachments provide legal services and counsel concerning command legal matters including, but not limited to, military justice, conducting investigations, adjudicating claims, and providing legal assistance. The Judge Advocate General-Field Offices provide legal support concerning military and administrative law. The Navy Claims program provides the resources necessary for the payment of the non-contractual claims against the Department of the Navy (DON). The Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV) conducts trials of newly constructed or older ships, service craft, and aircraft to ensure that they are suitable for their intended purpose. The Naval Safety Center promotes and monitors safety to reduce the incidence of accidents afloat and ashore. The Naval Historical Center manages the collection, preservation, exhibition and distribution of objects and information of historical interest. The Armed Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) provides news, command information, and entertainment programming aboard ship and overseas as part of the Navy’s effort to enhance combat effectiveness and retention by improving morale. The Naval Media Center provides visual information products and services for Navy and other users worldwide and designs, procures, operates, and maintains production and broadcast systems and equipment for Navy operated AFRTS outlets worldwide. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4A5M Other Personnel Support Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 0 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justitifcation: Includes the cost of individual and organizational clothing and equipment not already issued to military personnel and civilian personnel deploying to, participating in, or supporting a contingency operation. Navy request includes 10 additional Casualty Assistance Case Managers/workers to handle the increasing amount of cases as a result of GWOT.





Detail by Subactivity Group 4C0P Classified Programs

I. Description of Operations Financed: Classified programs in areas of signal intelligence, electronic warfare support measures, operation of special security communications, direction finding and exploitation of hostile command/control signals, detection/classification/tracking of platforms beyond radar range in support of weapons targeting and signal intelligence surveillance. II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Subactivity Group 4C0P Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total 1. CBS 2.2 – Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies 0 0 0 0


2. CBS 3.7 – Other Services and Miscellaneous Equipment 58,251 0 0 0

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs of procuring, leasing, or renting miscellaneous supplies or services used during the contingency operation. Navy request includes: imagery collection management and support services for classified requirements.


U.S. Marine Corps Strategic Overview Our Marines and Sailors in combat are our number one priority. With this priority in mind, we will focus on the following over the next few years: - Achieve victory in the Global War on Terrorism. - Provide our Nation a naval force that is fully prepared for employment as a MAGTF across the spectrum of conflict. - Reset and modernize to "be most ready when the Nation is least ready." - Improve the quality of life for our Marines and our families. America’s Marines are fully engaged in the fight for freedom around the globe. Fundamental to this fight are our forward-deployed Marines and Sailors. Our Marines and Sailors in combat are our number one priority in all that we do. It is through their tremendous sacrifices and those of their fellow servicemen and women that we will ultimately prevail. Our commitment to the Global War on Terrorism is characterized by central campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as by diverse and sustained engagement around the globe. Though we fight overseas, this is a war in defense of our homeland. It is a multifaceted, generational struggle that will not be won in one battle, in one country, or by one method. In this environment, along with the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard, we must be able to rapidly adapt to broad strategic conditions and wide ranging threats. As a Corps, we must remain faithful to our enduring mission — to be where our country needs us, when she needs us, and to prevail over whatever challenges we face. Most recently, the resourcefulness and versatility of our Marines have enabled our forces in Iraq to successively conduct major combat operations, engage in stability and security operations, and then transition to counterinsurgency (COIN) operations. Marines continue to succeed across the spectrum of conflict — often within the same deployment, within the same battle, and, frequently, within the same day. This adaptability is a core competency and trademark of our Corps — and must remain so for generations to come.

The Global War on Terrorism requires skillful strategic communications, cultural understanding, complex ethical decision-making, and combat power provided by "boots on the ground." It demands flexible organizations that adroitly apply a mix of combat and non-lethal actions; interagency capabilities and joint warfare applications; innovative use of airpower; and synchronization of intelligence activities. For rapid integration of these capabilities, no other military formation is more prepared to execute the full range of counterinsurgency tasks than the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) — our fundamental fighting organization. These efforts will ensure we continue to provide the joint force a unique, additive capability — one which is much greater than the sum of its parts. As we refine these capabilities within the MAGTF and integrate them with all the other elements of national power, we will further generate the institutional agility that has been the hallmark of our success. To further expand the Corps’ contribution to winning the Global War on Terrorism, we must: - Develop major training exercises to focus on interagency and coalition operations. - Lay out a plan that implements the post-QDR road map directives, while preserving core warfighting capabilities and capacity. - Assess homeland defense roles and missions that could be accomplished by increased employment of Marine Forces Reserve units when these units are not forward deployed. As a Force in Readiness we must Reset for Today and Modernize for Tomorrow: To meet the demands of the Global War on Terrorism, we must properly reset the force in order to simultaneously fight, train, and sustain our Corps. We have experienced equipment usage rates as much as seven times greater than peacetime rates — tremendously decreasing the projected lifespan of our equipment. To support our Marines in combat, we have routinely drawn additional equipment from strategic stocks; these stocks need to be replenished so as to remain responsive to emerging threats. Congress has responded rapidly and generously to our requests for equipment and increased protection for our Marines and Sailors. It

remains our responsibility to prudently manage these resources as we transition to modernization. - Continue to assess and seek funding for resetting damaged or worn equipment and reconstituting prepositioning programs. - Continue to assess, seek funding for, and integrate into training and operational forces the latest in protective equipment and IED-defeat programs for our engaged forces. - Conduct an assessment of fire support to determine the adequacy, integration, and modernization required in ground, aviation, and naval surface fires. - Invest in science and technology to provide the "seed corn" for future capabilities and prevent technological surprise. Taking Care of Marines & Their Families Marines take care of their own — period. This enduring pledge between Marines is never more sacred than during time of war. Just as every Marine makes a commitment to the Corps when they earn the title Marine, the Corps makes an enduring commitment to every Marine — and an enduring commitment to their family. Therefore, our Corps will: - Continue support to our wounded warriors. Just as we engage enemies on the battlefield, we must be equally aggressive in our support for Marines and Sailors who bear the scars of battle. To all our injured warriors — those Marines who suffer visible wounds and those who bear the less visible wounds of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or Traumatic Brain Injury — our commitment to you will not falter. - Stand up a Wounded Warrior Regiment. The mission of the Regiment will be to track and assist wounded Marines and Sailors. With battalion headquarters on both coasts, commanded by post-command officers selected by the Commandant, the Regiment will add discipline and continuity to taking care of our own. - Ensure our Family and Single Marine Programs have fully transitioned to a wartime footing in order to fulfill the promises made to our families. - More completely integrate our military, civilian, charitable, and Veterans Affairs programs to better meet the needs of our Marines, our injured Marines, and our families.

Department of the NavyFY 2007 GWOT Request

Operation and Maintenance, Marine CorpsO-1 Line Item Summary(Dollars in Thousands)

I. Description of Operations Financed:

Under the Primary End Item (PEI) rotation plan, specific pieces of Marine Corps equipment will be rotated out of theater for CONUS depot level repair once reaching a specified usage metric. Equipment being repaired and maintained under this program include critical and low density warfighting items. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) includes the Department of the Navy’s efforts for conducting stability and support operations throughout Iraq; the cessation of terrorist activities; and military related reconstruction operations. Support costs include activation of Reserve personnel and units, increased fuel consumption and spare parts, additional maintenance to support higher usage of equipment, deployment of medical capabilities (hospital ships and deployable fleet hospitals), predeployment training; extended communications and intelligence support, and related transportation costs. Additionally, costs include the purchase of investment items lost, damaged, or in need of replacement resulting from increased “wear and tear” from higher operating tempos.

Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) includes the Department of the Navy’s continuing support for efforts to track down terrorists and provide stability, primarily in Afghanistan and operations in the Horn of Africa (HoA). These objectives also include destroying terrorist training camps and infrastructure, capturing Al Qaeda leaders, stopping terrorist activities, and preventing the re-emergence of international terrorist organizations. Support costs include activation of Reserve personnel and units, increased fuel consumption and spare parts, additional maintenance supporting higher equipment usage, deployment of medical capabilities (hospital ships and deployable fleet hospitals), extended communications and intelligence support, and related transportation costs. Additionally, costs include the purchase of investment items lost, damaged, or in need of replacement resulting from increased “wear and tear” from higher operating tempos.



II. Force Structure Summary:

A. Forces

Types of ForcesFY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

Ships - - Aircraft 133 133 Tanks, Combat Vehicles 279 279 Support Vehicles 6,309 6,309 Ground Combat Forces 13,039 13,050 Ground Support Forces 6,717 6,723 Other Forces - -

B. Forces

PersonnelFY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate

Active 23,762 23,280 Reserve 2,715 3,214 Total 26,477 26,494

Funding supports approximately 22,500 deployed Marines in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, along with 4,000 deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa. Funding also includes approximately 7,000 mobilized Reserve Marines, of which, 3,200 are deployed in support of OIF/OEF. Table A lists the average number of Marines deployed by force type. Table B lists the average number of Active and Reserve forces deployed to the areas of responsibility.



FY 2007 Title IX


FY 2007 Total Estimate

010 01 1A1A Operational Forces 2,137,020 1,649,400 664,633 2,314,033 020 01 1A2A Field Logistics 166,862 169,760 531,632 701,392 030 01 1A3A Depot Maintenance 371,042 471,000 - 471,000 050 01 1B1B Maritime Prepositioning 36,592 38,302 - 38,302 070 01 BSM1 Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 162,540 - 19,186 19,186 080 01 BSS1 Base Support 126,657 68,616 33,474 102,090 090 03 3A1C Recruit Training 846 250 - 250 110 03 3B1D Specialized Skills Training 3,790 2,500 - 2,500 130 03 3B3D Professional Development Education 2,161 - - - 140 03 3B4D Training Support 91,582 59,315 62,936 122,251 150 03 3C1F Recruiting and Advertising 28,311 34,458 24,000 58,458 180 03 BSM3 Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 1,011 - - - 190 03 BSS3 Base Support 3,172 3,040 - 3,040 200 04 4A2G Special Support 4,922 362 - 362 210 04 4A3G Service-wide Transportation 277,808 192,003 65,733 257,736 220 04 4A4G Administration 1,032 - - - 250 04 BSS4 Base Support 531 - - -

3,415,879 2,689,006 1,401,594 4,090,600 Appropriation Totals

O-1 Line Item Number

Budget Activity

Sub-Activity Group Sub Activity Group Name

FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate


Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ReserveO-1 Line Item Summary(Dollars in Thousands)

FY 2007 Title IX


FY 2007 Total Estimate

010 01 1A1A Operational Forces 104,824 39,500 13,591 53,091 030 01 1A5A Training Support 1,492 5,000 - 5,000 040 01 BSM1 Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 8,719 - - - 050 01 BSS1 Base Support - 3,500 - 3,500 090 04 4A6G Recruiting and Advertising 60 - - - 100 04 BSS4 Base Support 3,390 - - -

118,485 48,000 13,591 61,591

FY 2006 Actuals

FY 2007 Estimate


O-1 Line Item Number

Budget Activity

Sub-Activity Group Sub Activity Group Name


Operation and Maintenance, Marine CorpsBudget Activity 01Activity Group 1A

Detail by Subactivity Group 1A1A Operational Forces


FY 2006II. Financial Summary ($ in thousands): Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total

A. 1A1A1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 287 426 - 426

2. CBS 1.2.2 - Operational Support - Military Intelligence Programs (MIP) 3,464 4,566 4,566 9,132

3. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 107,377 70,931 3,892 74,823

4. CBS 2.2 - Clothing and Other Personal Equipment 472,782 282,439 31,093 313,532

5. CBS 2.3 - Medical Support/Health Services 51,956 28,710 4,458 33,168

Operating Forces are the heart of the Marine Corps and are comprised by approximately 65% of active duty Marines. They form the forward presence, crisis response, and fighting power available to Combatant Commanders. Sub-activity Group 1A1A provides for the operating forces that make up the Marine Air-Ground Team, Marine Security Forces at Naval installations, and Forces aboard Naval vessels. These funds finance training and routine operations; maintenance and repair of organic ground equipment; routine supplies; travel, per diem and emergency leave; automatic data processing and purchases; replenishment and replacement of both unit and individual equipment.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is required for six additional mechanics to support the increased maintenance requirement necessary to keep the high rate of equipment availability to operational exercise forces conducting predeployment "Mojave Viper" training. Funds temporary employees for logistical functions in support of predeployment training.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is required for military intelligence programs which supportoperations in Iraq, the Horn of Africa, and Afghanistan.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested will be utilized for travel and per diem for Marines in support of deployed operations and forces. This includes travel for both Marines participating as individual augmentees in predeployment exercises and as individual augmentees in Iraq, the Horn of Africa, and Afghanistan.

FY 2007

a. Narrative Justification: Request includes funding for approximately 20,000 replacement setsof ballistic protection and individual load bearing equipment, replacement clothing sets for deployed/deploying Marines, and funding for replacement of gear utilized in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa, and other class II supplies. Funding procures necessary table of equipment to support three new Marine Corps Infantry battalions.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds replacement class VIII medical supplies used in Iraq,Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa (such as vehicle medical kits, first aid kits, and other routine medical supplies). Funding procures necessary medical equipment to support three new Marine Corps Infantry battalions.

Page 5 of 35




6. CBS 2.4 - Reserve Component Activation/Deactivation 49,030 103,676 - 103,676

7. CBS 2.5 - Morale, Welfare, and Recreation 23,486 50 5,069 5,119

8. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training 6,178 60,014 10,955 70,969

9. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs 518,695 125,577 44,037 169,614

10. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 333,492 136,975 369,702 506,677

a. Narrative Justification: The funds requested support approximately 7,000 Marines mobilized in support of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa with contingency per diem, travel, and travel per diem.

a. Narrative Justification: The funds requested support Morale, Welfare, and Recreation requirements in support of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds are requested to support pre-deployment training for both Active Duty and Mobilized Reserves. Operations in Iraq have necessitated a shift in Marine Corps warfighting focus towards stability and sustainment operations. Funding also supports language and enhanced intelligence training which are needed for daily operations, organic Marine Corps explosive ordinance disposal (EOD) training, home station training for Active and Reserve units, and Mojave Viper training support. Mojave Viper focuses greater attention on convoy operations, counter-IED tactics, and other irregular warfare necessities. Provides fundingfor the Improvised Explosive Detector Dog program which is an emerging capability that allows basic infantrymen the ability to detect explosives by controlling dogs "off-leash" from considerable distance as well as funding the Specialized Search Dog and Combat Tracker Dog program which allow Marines to detect explosives and locate friendly personnel in combat environments.

a. Narrative Justification: Includes funding for incremental increases in fuel, oils, and other consumables due to operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: The funds requested provide for other operational needs in theater such as firefighting equipment, security supplies, unit specific storage containers, and other equipment necessary for the support of operations in theater currently being used by Military Training Teams (MTTs) and Iraqi Training Teams (ITTs). Funding procures equipment to support three new Marine Corps Infantry Battalions.

Page 6 of 35




11. CBS 3.4 - Facilities and Base Support 213,095 111,057 - 111,057

12. CBS 3.5.1 - Field/Organizational Maintenance 51,877 484,547 11,659 496,206

13. CBS 3.5.2 - Intermediate Maintenance 36,961 7,737 - 7,737

14. CBS 3.5.3 - Depot Maintenance 15,414 - - -

15. CBS 3.5.4 - Contractor Logistics Support 8,090 4,398 - 4,398 a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested provide for enhanced and surge support for logistics operations both in CONUS supporting deployed operations and in theater. Funding requested for contractor analytical support in the development of operational assessment surveys and determination of the strengths and weaknesses of urgently deployed technologies; contractor engineering support for the integration of Improvised Explosive Device (IED) and Counter-IED (CIED) initiatives into command and control and blue force situational awareness initiatives; processing support for continuous inflow of Urgent Universal Needs Statements (UUNS) comingfrom operating forces in theater; and two contractors for Explosive Hazard Branch to conduct joint and service combat development efforts for Counter Radio Controlled IED Electronic Warfare capabilities that are critical to the force protection of personnel serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

a. Narrative Justification: Short-term costs decrease due to the consolidation of bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa and the corresponding increase in demand on current facilities. Costs include barrier and construction equipment and construction supplies.

a. Narrative Justification: N/A

a. Narrative Justification: Organizational maintenance is a critical element in preventing extensive wear-and-tear on Marine Corps equipment. Operational tempo in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa requires the Marine Corps to use available equipment on a continual basis. Some particular pieces of equipment, such as HMMWVs, are utilized at over 300% of peacetime usage rates. Equipment aging parallels the increased usage rates. An increase in preparing gear and equipment for predeployment training and a higher OPTEMPO has resulted in a higher demand for preventative and routine maintenance. Funds requested will purchase replacement parts, batteries, tires, contracted labor, and other field level maintenance inventory items.

a. Narrative Justification: Intermediate level maintenance includes the repair of subassemblies,assemblies, and major end items for return to lower echelons. Funds requested provide replacement parts and labor necessary to repair critical systems.

Page 7 of 35




16. CBS 3.6 - C4I 47,978 76,510 1,918 78,428

17. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 152,381 149,287 169,709 318,996

18. CBS 4.1 - Airlift 23,487 2,500 7,575 10,075

19. CBS 4.2 - Sealift 16,862 - - -

20. CBS 4.5 - Other Transportation 4,128 - - -

Subtotal 1A1A - Operational Forces 2,137,020 1,649,400 664,633 2,314,033


a. Narrative Justification: The requested amount funds the commercialization of critical communications assets in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa. This includes funding for mission-essential computer software refreshes, tactical bandwidth costs, satellite communication services, server software refresh, and other miscellaneous IT contracts. Funding is also requestedfor additional servers and mass storage devices for the Tactical Fusion Center (TFC) database that is used by Marine Forces in Iraq in order to maintain a continuity of operations for deployed forces; upgrades to communications hardware, and software for Special Intelligence Communications Equipment is needed to allow increased translation capabilities and information analysis gathered from forward operating bases in Iraq. Funding provides needed upgrades and hardware to the Command Operations Center (COC) to provide combatant commanders better capability to collaborate, share, and summarize military operations information.


a. Narrative Justification: Funds miscellaneous contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa for things such as construction, leased vehicles, contracted labor, and other miscellaneous contracts in support of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa. Funding provides Combatant Commanders with information operations capability requirements in order to execute efficient, responsive, and focused mission requirements. Funding provides local administration resources needed to manage and maintain Microsoft products which provide stable deployed data networks; contractor support at the Mojave Viper training facility at 29 Palms; and contracts for the fleet of 50 commercial up-armored dump trucks and 10 concrete transit mixers with dedicated operator and maintenance capabilities to support the transportation requirements of bulk class IV material across the MNF-W area of operations.

a. Narrative Justification: Due to unavailability of military air flights (committed to other OIF/OEF priorities), units and individuals must use costly commercial transportation to perform missions.

Page 8 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 1A2A Field Logistics



A. 1A2A1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 440 1,407 - 1,407

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 742 618 - 618

3. CBS 2.2 - Clothing and Other Personal Equipment - 106 19,980 20,086

4. CBS 2.3 - Medical Support/Health Services - 91 - 91

5. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training - 1,323 21,335 22,658

The Field Logistics sub-activity group provides the resources necessary for overall weapons system management and logistics support required to meet the operational needs of the MarinCorps. This sub-activity group specifically includes lifecycle management support of weapon systems/equipment; maintenance of servicewide stores and allotment accounting systems; technical support of weapon systems acquisition; monitoring of quality assurance programs; implementation of configuration management programs; implementation of total servicewide provisioning; and research, design and development of Marine Corps uniforms and specialized dress requirements. This mission also includes the assembly and disassembly of sets, kits, chests, collateral material and end-item components; and management of the Marine Corps' worldwide uniform clothing mail order support. Funds also reimburse the Defense Logistics Agency for the supply and distribution system that receives, stores, maintains and distributes the material required to meet the operational needs of the Marine Corps.

a. Narrative Justification: The increased use of equipment in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa requires increase logistics management in CONUS to ensure the continued availability of assets for use. The funds requested cover civilian overtime costs incurred in support of logistics in theater.

a. Narrative Justification: Logistics management and assessment teams are employed to better manage and improve operations in theater. The funds requested provide travel and per diem for teams doing on-site visits in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

FY 2007

a. Narrative Justification: Funding will provide necessary contractor support to Marine Expeditionary Force Simulation Centers, Combines Arms Staff Trainers (CAST), Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Information Systems Training Centers (MISTC), the MAGTF Staff Training Program (MSTP), and support for the Biometric Automated Toolset (BATS) Trainer used in training Marines prior to deployment.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds Clothing-Fire Retardant Organizational Gear (C-FROG) which provides protection from fire related threats such as Improvised Explosive Devices, mitigating the potential of burn related injuries.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds replacement class VIII medical supplies used in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa (such as vehicle medical kits, first aid kits, and other routine medical supplies).

Page 9 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 1A2A Field Logistics

6. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs - 750 125,000 125,750


8. CBS 3.5.2 - Intermediate Maintenance - 35,300 - 35,300

9. CBS 3.5.4 - Contractor Logistics Support - - 20,908 20,908

10. CBS 3.6 - C4I - 36,086 113,010 149,096

Subtotal 1A2A - Field Logistics 166,862 169,760 531,632 701,392

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested to provide target location systems to training teamsdeployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa. Funds ISR services contract. The contract for Scan Eagle will provide Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capability through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to MEFs in theater to increase ISR coverage and capability.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is requested to provide contractors to assist in providing sustainment support for theater specific equipment.

a. Narrative Justification: The large area of Marine Corps responsibility in Iraq , Afghanistan,and the Horn of Africa strains current communications systems. Effective logistics managementrequires updated and enhanced services and equipment. Funds requested here provide support for wide area networks, software upgrades for urgent universal needs equipment, multi-band mission radio installation, and spare parts for communications equipment.

a. Narrative Justification: Increases in equipment density and the augmentation of traditional equipment sets with new capabilities (such as counter-IED equipment) include increased requirements for logistical support. Funds requested support sustainment of urgent universal need statement purchases (high powered jammers, Z-Backscatter vans, IED defeat vehicles, unit operations centers, etc.), care of supplies in storage, logistics management technology suites, andlogistics management equipment.

a. Narrative Justification: Request for funding includes the repair of radar components and intermediate maintenance of other equipment assemblies and to secure an additional source of intermediate level maintenance capability in theater through the utilization of Army facilities. The contract, with the Army Material Command (AMC), establishes a maintenance capability for Marine Corps combatant commanders to repair damaged equipment. The statement of work includes performing inspection and repair only as necessary, storage of the Marine Expeditionary Unit augmented support equipment, principal end items maintenance and rotation and repair of reparable spare parts.

Page 10 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 1A3A Depot Maintenance



A. 1A3A1. CBS 3.5.3 - Depot Maintenance 371,042 471,000 - 471,000

Subtotal 1A3A - Depot Maintenance 371,042 471,000 0 471,000

FY 2007

This sub-activity group funds the depot level maintenance (major repair/rebuild) of Marine Corps ground equipment. Repair/rebuild is accomplished on a scheduled basis to maintain the materiel readiness of the equipment inventory necessary to support the operational needs of the Operating Forces. Items programmed for repair are screened to ensure that a valid stock requirement exists and that the repair or rebuild of the equipment is the most cost effective means of satisfying the requirement. This program is closely coordinated with the Procurement, Marine Corps appropriation to ensure that the combined repair/procurement program provides a balanced level of attainment of inventory objectives for major equipment. Thus, the specified items to be rebuilt, both principal end items and components, are determined by a process which utilizes cost-benefit considerations as a prime factor. The rebuild costs for each item are updated annually on the basis of current applicable cost factors at the performing activities.

a. Narrative Justification: The funds in this request support Marine Corps asset rotation and repair goals for FY 2007. Under the Primary End Item (PEI) rotation plan, specific pieces of Marine Corps equipment will be rotated out of theater for CONUS depot repair once reaching a specified usage metric. Many primary end items have been in theater for two years and have not been rotated to receive full depot level repair. Equipment being repaired and maintained under this program include critical and low density warfighting items such as: 155MM Howitzer, M1A1, Medium Girder Bridges, Decontaminant Systems, Combat Excavators, Refueling Trailers, M-16 Rifles, Squad Automatic Weapons, Communications Electronic gear, Fire Finder Radars, and Radios which were damaged as a result of deployment and engagement to the designated areas of ensuing warfare.

Page 11 of 35


Operation and Maintenance, Marine CorpsBudget Activity 01Activity Group 1B

Detail by Subactivity Group 1B1B Maritime Prepositioning



C. 1B1B1. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 110 35 - 35

2. CBS 3.5.2 - Intermediate Maintenance 12,501 6,335 - 6,335

This sub-activity group finances the Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) program and the Aviation Logistics Support Ships (TAVB). The O&M funding for MPF and TAVB finances training and exercise costs as well as the cost of maintaining the equipment and supplies in a ready-to-operate status. Marine Corps Logistics Bases support all aspects of maintenance cycle operations for the Prepositioning programs. Maintenance cycle operations include maintenance operations support, port operations, stevedoring costs, receipt and preparation for shipment cost, and contracted maintenance. Additionally, support costs, transportation costs, and exercise costs are centrally administered by Headquarters, Marine Corps. These funds provide for contractor support, transportation of Prepositioning equipment and supplies, and for the Marine Forces exercise costs associated with the Prepositioning programs.

a. Narrative Justification: Logistics management and assessment teams are employed to better manage and improve operations in theater. The funds requested provide travel and per diem for teams supporting the MPS program for operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is requested to support the Marine Corps wide contracted Maritime Prepositioning Ship (MPS) Program that provides globally prepositioned, sustainable warfighting capability to the operating forces and to theater Combatant Commanders. The MPS is currently in a degraded status as a result of offloading during OIF I and II operations to support the Combatant Commanders. Funds are required to purchase consumable and reparable spare parts utilized during the MPS maintenance cycle, shelf-life replacement, care-in-stores materials, 30 day sustainment block requirements, and supply replacement.

FY 2007

Page 12 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 1B1B Maritime Prepositioning

3. CBS 3.5.3 - Depot Maintenance - 10,335 - 10,335

4. CBS 3.5.4 - Contractor Logistics Support 21,774 21,597 - 21,597

5. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 2,207 - - -

Subtotal 1B1B - Maritime Prepositioning 36,592 38,302 - 38,302


a. Narrative Justification: The planned increase of equipment rotating out of theater requires a dedicated staging lot for equipment management. Funds requested support the staging lot in Al Taqaddum and the personnel who manage and prepare the equipment which alleviates operating forces of the responsibility and administration of equipment identified for Primary End Item (PEI) rotation.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is required to purchase contracted logistics support functions performed by the Marine Corps Maintenance Contractor (MCMC) at Blount Island, aboard ship and/or wherever deployed. Costs are primarily for labor to provide maintenance for those Maritime Prepositioning Fleet assets downloaded and in need of maintenance.

Page 13 of 35


Operation and Maintenance, Marine CorpsBudget Activity 01Activity Group BS

Detail by Subactivity Group BSM1 Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization



C. BSM11. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 44,570 - - -


2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 4 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

3. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs 29 - 98 98

4. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 21,545 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

5. CBS 3.4 - Facilities, Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization 67,522 - 19,088 19,088

6. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 28,899 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

Subtotal BSM1 - Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization 162,540 - 19,186 19,186

FY 2007

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested support increase in fuel, oils, and other consumables requirements due to operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: The funds requested support FSRM projects both in CONUS supporting GWOT and in Iraq. Projects include those necessary to support increase depot throughput as a result of GWOT, facilities and structures to support enhanced predeployment training, and other facilities necessitated by operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

This sub-activity group funds Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) for the Expeditionary Forces Activity Group.

Sustainment provides resources for maintenance and repair activities necessary to keep an inventory of facilities in good working order. It includes regularly scheduled adjustments and inspections, preventive maintenance tasks, and emergency response and service calls for minor repairs. Sustainment also includes major repairs or replacement of facility components (usually accomplished by contract) that are expected to occur periodically throughout the life cycle of facilities. This work includes regular roof replacement, refinishing of wall surfaces, repairing and replacement of heating and cooling systems, replacement of tile and carpeting, and similar types of work. As a result of the Global War on Terrorism, facilities and structures used not only in the training of Marines but at equipment maintenance facilities as well has seen an increase in use and wear and tear. Funding supports the sustainment at these facilities as a result of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

Restoration includes repair and replacement work to restore facilities damaged by lack of sustainment, excessive age, natural disaster, fire, accident, or other causes.

Modernization includes alteration of facilities solely to implement new or higher standards (including regulatory changes), to accommodate new functions, or to replace building components that typically last more than 50 years (such as foundations and structural members).

Page 14 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group BSS1 Base Support



C. BSS11. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 7,830 6,311 - 6,311

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 3,644 5,010 - 5,010

3. CBS 2.2 - Clothing and Other Personal Equipment 2 2 - 2

4. CBS 2.3 - Medical Support/Health Services - 29 - 29

5. CBS 2.4 - Reserve Component Activation/Deactivation 25 53 - 53

This sub-activity group funds base support for the Expeditionary Forces Activity Group.

FY 2007

Administrative services finance such functions as installation financial and military/civilian manpower management and base safety and legal services. Specific services finance organic supply operations in support of the installations, including vehicle operation and maintenance. Community support services provide for support of living facilities, food services, recreation areas, special services programs and common use facilities. Real Property services consist of utilities operations and other engineering support. Base communication includes the operation and maintenance of telephone systems, including data communications, radio and facsimile equipment and the administrative costs associated with message reproduction and distribution as well as payments for long distance toll charges. The environmental category includes compliance, conservation, and pollution prevention, to include air, water, and soil pollution abatement; environmental restoration; natural, cultural, historic, land, forest, and coastal zone management; and hazardous waste handling and disposal.

a. Narrative Justification: The requested funding supports civilian overtime and additional temporary personnel in support of GWOT operations. Services performed include additional staffing at facilities supporting the families of deployed Marines (child care, counseling, etc).

a. Narrative Justification: The requested funds support travel and per diem costs for the next-of-kin to Marine casualties and other travel related to Operation Iraqi Freedom.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds clothing and other protective gear that is required at Marine Corps installations to support operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds replacement class VIII medical supplies that are required at Marine Corps installations to support operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds support contingency per diem and travel costs to support approximately 7,000 Marines mobilized in support of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa .

Page 15 of 35




6. CBS 2.5 - Morale, Welfare, and Recreation 38,080 5,504 - 5,504

7. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training 40 309 - 309

8. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs 29 6,209 - 6,209


10. CBS 3.4 - Facilities and Base Support 10,670 13,408 21,366 34,774

11. CBS 3.5.2 - Intermediate Maintenance - 32 - 32

12. CBS 3.5.4 - Contractor Logistics Support - 91 - 91

a. Narrative Justification: The funds requested support MWR requirements at Marine Corps installations in support of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds required for base support for predeployment training.


a. Narrative Justification: Funds are required for general supplies and equipment at bases, such as printing materials, weapons containers, vehicle leases in support of increased operations, and other GWOT related equipment.

a. Narrative Justification: The funding requested provides collateral equipment for prior supplemental military construction projects, prior year facilities sustainment/modernization projects, and other projects related to GWOT support operations in CONUS.

a. Narrative Justification: Request for funding includes the repair of components and other equipment assemblies on Marine Corps installations that are necessary to support operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested provide for enhanced and surge support for logistics operations in CONUS supporting deployed operations. Contractor support is imperative to help absorb the additional workload being applied to Marine Corps Commands supporting the Global War on Terrorism efforts ongoing in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

Page 16 of 35




13. CBS 3.6 - C4I 437 11,972 - 11,972

14. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 35,148 14,286 - 14,286

15. CBS 4.5 - Other Transportation 3,521 - - -

Subtotal BSS1 - Base Support 126,657 68,616 33,474 102,090


a. Narrative Justification: Includes miscellaneous contracts for support operations, including motivational mail in Iraq and increased administration requirements in CONUS.

a. Narrative Justification: Attacks on Marine Corps information technology networks pose a significant threat to deployed forces. The requested funds provide critical software and hardware training to Marines deployed in Iraq to prevent and/or contain attacks on Marine Corps networks regardless of origin. The requested amount also supports iridium satellite bandwidth to ensure that Marines have dedicated, reliable communication services otherwise unavailable in theater.

Page 17 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 3A1C Recruit Training



A. 3A1C1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 200 - - -

2. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs - 11 - 11

3. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 646 239 - 239

Subtotal 3A1C - Recruit Training 846 250 0 250

a. Narrative Justification: Funds necessary equipment and supplies needed for recruit training exercises in support of the GWOT.

The transition from civilian life to duties as a Marine occurs as a result of recruit training for new enlistees conducted at one of the two Marine Corps Recruit Depots located at Parris Island, South Carolina and at San Diego, California. This intense period of training is designed to prepare the new Marine for assignment to units of the Operating Forces, to major posts and stations, to duty at sea aboard vessels of the U.S. Navy, and to specialized skill training prior to assignment to a unit. During recruit training, the Marine is taught basic military skills, and develops confidence in himself and in members of his unit, while being closely supervised by special skilled Marines. The objective of the training is to produce a Marine who can assimilate well into a unit and, in time of emergency, sustain himself on the battlefield. Marines graduating from recruit training are assigned to formal schools for specialized skills training in a military occupational specialty (MOS).

FY 2007



Page 18 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 3B1D Specialized Skills Training



A. 3B1D 1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 1,139 1,163 - 1,163

2. CBS 2.1 TAD/TDY 750 744 - 744

3. CBS 2.5 - Morale Welfare and Recreation 510 - - -

4. CBS 3.1 Pre-Deployment Training 249 355 - 355

5. CBS 3.2 OPTEMPO Costs - 36 - 36

6. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 198 202 - 202

7. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 944 - - -

Subtotal 3B1D - Specialized Skills Training 3,790 2,500 - 2,500

FY 2007


Upon completion of Officer Acquisition Training or Recruit Training, the Marine is assigned to courses of instruction to acquire the requisite skills to meet the minimum requirements of a Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). Officer Training involves completion of The Basic School at the Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC), Quantico, Virginia, and the assignment to a MOS qualifying course such as the Infantry Officer's Course or the Command and Control Systems School. The enlisted Marine undergoes specialized skill training at Marine Corps installations or at schools of other Services, depending on the designated MOS. The majority of specialized skills training is provided at subsequent career points to qualify Marines for occupational specialties involving higher levels of proficiency or responsibilities and to develop the functional skills required within specific job assignments. To ensure adequate input of qualified personnel for assignment to Marine Corps commands, approximately 8,635 officer and 94,559 enlistedregular and reserve Marines participate in this category of training annually.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requested support the costs of two International Affairs Officers participating in the State Department's International Cooperative Support Services (ICASS) International Affairs Officer Program. One officer is in Columbia combating narco-terrorists and the other is at the Israeli War College. It is the mechanism used to recoup the costs of operating United States embassies abroad by charging all official US personnel assigned to the host nation for embassy services (including overhead). Assignment of these officers is directly tied to USMC efforts in the GWOT.

a. Narrative Justification: The requested funding supports civilian overtime and additional temporary personnel in support of GWOT operations.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding requested for TAD costs in support of the GWOT.



a. Narrative Justification: Funds necessary equipment and supplies needed to support specialized skills training.

Page 19 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 3B3D Professional Development Education



A. 3B3D1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 193 - - -

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 1,042 - - -

3. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Development Training 926 - - -

Subtotal 3B3D - Professional Development Education 2,161 0 0 0

This sub-activity group allows career Marines to enhance their overall professional development and to qualify them for increased command and staff responsibilities. Funded in this sub-activity group are programs for officers and Staff Non-Commissioned Officers (SNCOs) within the Marine Corps, at schools of other Services, and at civilian institutions. The Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC), Quantico, Virginia, is the field activity with primary responsibility for professional development education. The professional development education schools located at this installation are the Command and Staff College, Expeditionary Warfare School and the SNCO Academy. The courses taught at the Command and Staff College and the Expeditionary Warfare School are designed primarily for Majors and Captains. These courses emphasize the Marine Air-Ground team in amphibious operations to prepare the student for command and staff assignments at the Division/Wing, Regiment/Group and Battalion/Squadron levels, as well as for assignment to departmental, joint or combined staffs. The overall objective of the instruction is to present the doctrine, tactics and techniques of amphibious warfare with a view toward potential employment andresponsiveness of amphibious forces in support of changing strategy.

This sub-activity group also supports Marines undergoing professional development education at schools of other Services and at civilian institutions where students study a variety of academic that are offered to them for staff assignments that require expertise in technical or scientific areas.


FY 2007



Page 20 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 3B4D Training Support



A. 3B4D1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 909 - - -

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 975 - - -

3. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training 72,339 59,314 62,936 122,250

This sub-activity group funds travel and per diem costs of Marine students attending Service and civilian schools away from their permanent duty stations. Also included are costs for training support equipment, audiovisual aids, computer assisted training programs, and direct administrative support to the training management function, the Expeditionary Warfare Training Groups (EWTGs), minor training devices, and the Marine Corps Institute.

a. Narrative Justification: Provides operation and maintenance funds to support Mojave Viper predeployment training program for role players, support personnel, and training support. Funding is used to provide contractor support to MEF Simulation Centers, Combined Arms Staff Trainers (CAST), MAGTF Information Systems Training Centers (MISTC) and the MAGTF Staff Training Program (MSTP). OIF and OEF have increased OPTEMPO resulting in an increased demand for training in Simulation Centers. The addition of the CAST upgrade system brings a need for contractor support in CASTs. The transition of MISTCs from Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) to Training and Education Command (TECOM) has brought with it the need to have instructors and technical support in those facilities. Finally, the creation of the Command and Control Center of Excellence (C2COE) and receipt of the MISTCs requires sustainment. Provides funding to support the operation of the Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning (CAOCL). Funds a variety of efforts in support of GWOT and the shift to irregular warfare.Funds Marine Corps Center for Lessons Learned, formal schools Centers of Excellence (COEs), Enlisted Professional Military Education and Training (EPME-T), Distance learning infrastructure as well as additional courses and training related to GWOT. Provides forward presence for communications training. This capability is especially critical to USMC's ability to have training keep pace with technological upgrades and updates without having to send Marines back to the formal schools. Funds Specialized Search Dog and Combat Tracker Team Training support.

FY 2007



Page 21 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 3B4D Training Support

4. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs 1 - 1

5. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 725 - - -

6. CBS 3.6 - C4I 3,317 - - -

7. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 13,317 - - -

Subtotal 3B4D - Training Support 91,582 59,315 62,936 122,251





Page 22 of 35


Operation and Maintenance, Marine CorpsBudget Activity 03Activity Group 3C

Detail by Subactivity Group 3C1F Recruiting and Advertising



A. 3C1F2. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 28,311 34,458 24,000 58,458

Subtotal 3C1F - Recruiting and Advertising 28,311 34,458 24,000 58,458

Recruiting: The operations financed in this sub-activity include expenses incurred in developing a proficient military recruiting force, salaries of civilian personnel associated with recruiting, administrative supplies, communications, travel, per diem, leasing of recruiting vehicles, recruiter out-of-pocket expenses (ROPE), applicant processing costs and equipment.Advertising: Marine Corps advertising includes support for all officers, enlisted, Marine-option NROTC, retention and market analysis programs. Purchased with these funds are media (magazines, broadcast, outdoor advertising, etc.), production (creative, photography, art work), and market analysis included in the advertising campaign.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds increased recruiting activities necessary to support current end strength being utilized in operations in Iraq, the Horn of Africa, and Afghanistan, as well as challenges facing recruiters with the surge of Marines that will deploy into Iraq. Items deficient in FY 2007 are Educator Workshops, Applicant Processing and Travel, Officer Candidate flight physicals and Prior Service IRR physicals, training and TAD, Information technology, GSA leased vehicles. Funding provides support for target market analysis, media production and disemmination, lead generation efforts, and recruiter support materials to create awareness and brand recognition.

FY 2007

Page 23 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group BSM3 Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization



C. BSM31. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 679 - - -

2. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 285 - - -


Subtotal BSM3 - Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization 1,011 0 0 0

This sub-activity group funds Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) for the Training and Education Activity Group.

Sustainment provides resources for maintenance and repair activities necessary to keep an inventory of facilities in good working order. It includes regularly scheduled adjustments and inspections, preventive maintenance tasks, and emergency response and service calls for minor repairs. Sustainment also includes major repairs or replacement of facility components (usually accomplished by contract) that are expected to occur periodically throughout the life cycle of facilities. This work includes regular roof replacement, refinishing of wall surfaces, repairing and replacement of heating and cooling systems, replacement of tile and carpeting, and similar types of work.

Restoration includes repair and replacement work to restore facilities damaged by lack of sustainment, excessive age, natural disaster, fire, accident, or other causes.



FY 2007



Page 24 of 35






A. BSS31. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 2,106 7 - 7

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 166 103 - 103

3. CBS 2.2 - Clothing and Other Personal Equipment 7 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

4. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training 16 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A


6. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 5 2,614 - 2,614

7. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 872 12 - 12

Subtotal BSS3 - Base Support 3,172 3,040 0 3,040

This sub-activity group funds the Base Support function for the Training and Education Activity Group.

FY 2007

a. Narrative Justification: Funding supports audiovisual and communications related requirements for distribution of training videos and materials.


a. Narrative Justification: Funds are required for general supplies and equipment at bases, such as printing materials, weapons containers, vehicle leases in support of increased operations, and other GWOT related equipment.


a. Narrative Justification: Funds support premium pay for two civilian safety technicians deployed supporting on-going GWOT operations.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds support TAD deployment costs for Marines located at MCB Quantico.

Page 25 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 4A2G Special Support



A. 4A2G1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 109 - - -

2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 68 - - -

3. CBS 2.5 - Morale Welfare and Recreation 2,135 - - -

4. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 1,957 362 - 362


Subtotal 4A2G - Special Support 4,922 362 - 362


This sub activity group supports Marine Corps prisoners confined at the Army Disciplinary Command, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas; Marine Corps Personnel Administration and Support Activity (MCPASA); the Marine Band located at the Marine Barracks, 8th and I Streets, Washington, DC; and the quality of life (QOL) programs of Child Care and Development and Family Service Centers. It also finances the administration of missions, functions and worldwide operation of the Marine Corps via MCPASA. Cost of operations includes civilian personnel salaries, Defense Finance and Accounting Service reimbursements, automated data processing, printing and reproduction, and travel for military and civilian personnel services on a Marine Corps-wide basis.

a. Narrative Justification: Provides funding to provide contractor support to capture observations, history, and lessons learned from OIF/OEF.




FY 2007

Page 26 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 4A3G Servicewide Transportation



A. 4A3G1. CBS 4.5 - Second Destination Transportation 277,808 192,003 65,733 257,736

Subtotal 4A3G - Servicewide Transportation 277,808 192,003 65,733 257,736

FY 2007

This sub-activity group funds the transportation of Marine Corps owned material and supplies by the most economical mode that will meet in-transit time standards in support of the Department of Defense Uniform Materiel Movement and Issue Priority System. All resources in this program are used to reimburse industrially funded or commercial transportation carriers for transportation services.

This program finances all costs related to Second Destination Transportation of cargo to the operating forces overseas and within the continental United States, as well as prepositioning of Marine Corps owned material and equipment to overseas locations. Categories of transportation are: Military Sealift Command for ocean cargo; Inland transportation by Commercial Carriers for movement between CONUS installations and ports; Air Mobility Command for air movement of priority cargo in support of the Operating Forces; and Surface Deployment Distribution Command for port handling of ocean cargo.

a. Narrative Justification: Supports Military Sealift Command (MSC), sealift and commercial airlift of critical items needed to sustain the deployed force engaged in GWOT operations. Funds support the Marine Corps Primary End Item (PEI) rotation plan, for specific pieces of equipment that will be rotated out of theater for CONUS depot level repair.

Page 27 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 4A4G Administration



A. 4A4G1. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 32 - - -

2. CBS 2.5 - Morale, Welfare, and Recreation 1,000 - - -

Subtotal 4A4G - Administration 1,032 0 0 0

The cost of operations financed by this sub-activity group includes civilian personnel salaries, automated data processing, printing, and reproduction, travel expenses for military and civilian personnel, expenses for Marine Corps representatives attending public functions as speakers and guests of honor, and purchase, maintenance and rental of office equipment and supplies.


FY 2007


Page 28 of 35






A. BSS41. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 342 - - -

2. CBS 2.1 TAD/TDY 178 - - -


Subtotal BSS4 - Base Support 531 0 0 0


FY 2007

This sub-activity group funds base support functions for the Service-wide Support activity group.




Page 29 of 35


Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ReserveBudget Activity 01Activity Group 1A




A. 1A1A1. CBS 1.2 - Civilian Pay and Allowances 2,318 - - -


2. CBS 2.1 - TAD/TDY 508 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

3. CBS 2.2 - Clothing and Other Personal Equipment - 35,402 3,355 38,757

4. CBS 2.3 - Medical Support/Health Services - 1,243 2,579 3,822

5. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training - 2,645 7,657 10,302

6. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs 8,530 210 - 210

7. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 93,468 - - - a. Narrative Justification: N/A

Subtotal 1A1A - Operational Forces 104,824 39,500 13,591 53,091

This sub-activity group provides funds for the day-to-day cost of training and support to the Marine Forces Reserve. This program includes funding for materiel readiness, purchase and replacement of expense type items authorized by unit training allowances, local repair of equipment, training centers, and mount out materiels for training and preparation for mobilization.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requirement for clothing and protective gear to support operations in Iraq, the Horn of Africa, and Afghanistan.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requirement to replacement class VIII medical supplies used in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa (such as vehicle medical kits, first aid kits, and other routine medical supplies).

FY 2007

a. Narrative Justification: Funds requirement to support equipment and supplies necessary for contracting and logistics training.

a. Narrative Justification: Includes requirement for incremental increases in fuel, oils, and other consumables due to operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

Page 30 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 1A5A Training Support



A. 1A5A1. CBS 3.1 - Pre-Deployment Training - 4,950 - 4,950


3. CBS 3.3 - Other Equipment and Supplies 1,492 - - -

Subtotal 1A5A - Training Support 1,492 5,000 - 5,000

This sub-activity group supports exercises, weekend training (both at and away from Reserve training centers), annual training duty, Mobilization Operational Readiness Deployment Tests (MORDT's), and individual training through formal schools, civilian institutions, and mobile training teams. The program includes transportation and travel costs for exercises, inspections, training aides, training directives, operating costs of equipment used in training, officer and enlisted billeting fees at training sites, and the hire of commercial vehicles to support operations.

a. Narrative Justification: Funds support equipment sustainment and supplies necessary for training and simulation systems and training site preparation costs. Training systems include the Virtual Combat Convoy Trainer (VCCT), The Improved Marksmanship Simulation Trainer (ISMT), the Indirect Fire-Forward Air Control Trainer (I-FACT), the Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement-Training System (MTVR-TS), several variants of the Combat Vehicle Training System (CVTS), and Improvised Explosive Device Simulators (IEDSIMS) which are all an integral part of OIF/OEF predeployment training.

FY 2007



Page 31 of 35


Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ReserveBudget Activity 01Activity Group BS

Detail by Subactivity Group BSM1 Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization


FY 2006 FY 2008II. Financial Summary ($ in thousands): Actuals Title IX Supplemental Total Total

C. BSM11. CBS 3.4 - Intermediate Maintenance 8,719 - - - -


Subtotal BSM1 - Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization 8,719 0 0 0 0

FY 2007

This sub-activity group funds Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) for the Marine Forces Reserve (MARFORRES). Sustainment provides resources for maintenance and repair activities necessary to keep an inventory of Reserve facilities in good working order. It includes regularly scheduled adjustments and inspections, preventive maintenance tasks, emergency response and service calls for minor repairs, and minor construction of facilities. The building of new facilities and improvements or alterations of existing facilities are included in minor construction. Restoration includes repair and replacement work to restore facilities damaged by lack of sustainment, excessive age, natural disaster, fire, accident, or other causes.


Page 32 of 35






C. BSS11. CBS 3.2 - OPTEMPO Costs - 40 - 40

2. CBS 3.4 - Facilities and Base Support - 3,460 3,460

Subtotal BSS1 - Base Support 0 3,500 0 3,500

FY 2007

Base Operations Support funding provides for administrative services and support of civilian personnel for Base Support services for the Marine Forces Reserve. Funding is also provided for utilities, janitorial services, public affairs, Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) support, postage, base communications and environmental compliance costs.

a. Narrative Justification: Funding is requested for additional network support required for a number of reserve-unique enterprise applications which support GWOT operations. These applications are absolutely essential to the administration, training, and equipping of the Marine Corps Reserve in their support of GWOT.


Page 33 of 35



Detail by Subactivity Group 4A6G Recruiting and Advertising



A. 4A6G1. CBS 3.7 - Miscellaneous Contracts 60 - - -


Subtotal 4A6G - Recruiting and Advertising 60 0 0 0

FY 2007

Recruiting: The operations financed in this sub-activity include expenses incurred in developing a proficient military recruiting force, salaries of civilian personnel associated with recruiting, administrative supplies, communications, travel, per diem, leasing of recruiting vehicles, recruiter out-of-pocket expenses (ROPE), applicant processing costs and equipment.

Advertising: Marine Corps advertising includes support for all officers, enlisted, Marine-option NROTC, retention and market analysis programs. Purchased with these funds are media (magazines, broadcast, outdoor advertising, etc.), production (creative, photography, art work), and market analysis included in the advertising campaign.

Page 34 of 35






C. BSS41. CBS 3.6 - C4I 3,390 - - -


Subtotal BSS4 - Base Support 3,390 0 0 0

FY 2007

Other Base Support funding provides administrative services and support to civilian personnel in support of the Marine Reserve Force at Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps (HQMC). This sub-activity group also funds the travel and training for HQMC personnel, Automated Data Processing (ADP) support for HQMC, and training systems managed by the Marine Corps Systems Command.

Page 35 of 35

Exhibit OP-5 (GWOT) Detail by Sub activity Group (Page 1 of 5)

United States Coast Guard (USCG) Contingency Operation: OIF/OEF/GWOT Operations

USCG Operations Budget Activity 2

Activity Group 2C Detail by Sub activity Group 2C3H USCG Operations

I. Description of Operations Financed: This sub activity group includes funds for the United States Coast Guard operational support. The Coast Guard will continue to provide the Department of Defense (DOD) operational support for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operating Enduring Freedom (OEF). All DOD combatant commanders’ mission assignments requiring direct Coast Guard forces and support for OIF, OEF and Strategic Ports of Embarkation & Debarkation (SPOE/SPOD) security remain in effect and are not expected to decrease. Specific Coast Guard activities in support of DOD requirements include the operation and maintenance of six 110-foot WPB Large Patrol Boats, and Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS), deployment of one PSU detachment to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) maritime/counter-terrorism security, and Coast Guard Reservists providing maritime security at military strategic ports of embarkation and debarkation (SPOE/SPOD). Incremental costs for the Coast Guard to support DOD under OIF, OEF and GWOT are not included in the Coast Guard’s appropriated budget base as part of the annual Department of Homeland Security Appropriation.


II. Financial Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 A. Sub activity OIF/OEF Actuals 1/ Title IX Supp Total 1. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 1.1 41,500 27,000 15,080 42,080 Military Personnel Pay and Allowances

a. Narrative Justification: This category funds all incremental pay and allowances of Active USCG and mobilized USCG Reserve personnel participating in or supporting this contingency operation. Includes special pay (Imminent Danger Pay or Hostile Fire Pay, Foreign Duty Pay), Family Separation Allowance, Hardship Duty Pay and any other entitlement above normal monthly payroll costs, including those called to Active duty to backfill for Active duty personnel directly supporting the contingency operation. Includes all Reserve Component incremental pre-deployment training, allowances, travel, and per diem for specially required training prior to activation. FY06 Military Pay for Coast Guard Reserve forces recalled to active duty to support OIF contingency operations escalated to FY07 rates. Includes 2.4M for OIF / tramatic SGLI benefit (P.L. 109-233).

2. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 2.1 18,000 8,387 9,633 18,020 Temporary Duty (TDY) Temporary Addition Duty (TAD)

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of travel, per diem and lodging for military members that result from participation in these contingency operations. Examples include travel and lodging during predeployment training for the 110-foot cutter crews and extensive security and boat crew qualifications training for the Port Security Units and the security forces responsible for military outloads at Special Ports of Embarkation/Debarkation.

3. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 2.2 1,070 498 572 1,070 Clothing and Other Personnel Equipment and Supplies

a. Narrative Justification: Includes recapitalizing body armor, law enforcement support gear and protective equipment needed due to extensive use in harsh environs and the high tempo of operations. Additional gear is needed for predeployment training and for new issues as members report to their assignments.

4. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 2.3 3,180 1,480 1,700 3,180 Medical Support and Health Services

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the medical and dental costs associated with mobilization and demobilization of reservists. Approximately 7% of demobilizing reservists require being placed on a medical hold while receiving needed treatments.


5. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 2.4 2,000 950 1,090 2,040 Reserve Component Activation and Deactivation

a. Narrative Justification: This category funds Reserve Component Activation (mobilization) and Deactivation (demobilization) of Reserve units or individual Reservists, including transportation from home station to active duty station. Training to bring Reserve Components up to active force readiness standards are considered activation costs. This excludes costs of pay, allowances, active duty TDY/TAD, and transportation to and from the area of operation, training, and other costs that are reported elsewhere.

6. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 2.5 11,500 5,352 6,148 11,500 Other Personnel Support

a. Narrative Justification: Funds other personnel support and unusual costs such as permanent change of station (PCS), end of term of service (ETS), or special actions associated with household goods or privately-owned vehicle (POV) storage for personnel associated this contingency operation. Includes funds for the Coast Guard portion of the SGLI increment due to OIF claims, all services share proportionally. This also funds Reserve Educational Benefits under Section 1607 of Title 10 U.S.C.

7. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 3.1 3,600 1,736 1,994 3,730 Training

a. Narrative Justification: Includes costs associated with OIF predeployment training of active duty and reserve Coast Guard personnel at the Special Missions Training Center (SMTC). SMTC also provides training for Port Security Unit personnel prior to deployment to OEF. Includes in-theater costs associated with training Coast Gaurdsmen and personnel during the contingency operation as well as antiterrorism training. Includes costs associated with firearms proficiency training.

8. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 3.2 45,000 21,151 24,294 45,445 Operational Tempo

a. Narrative Justification: Incremental operational costs for the Coast Guard to operate and support contingency operations in OIF / OEF. Includes 6 – 110-foot WPBs operating at 1000 hours above programmed hours in Northern Arabian Gulf. Includes incremental costs to outfit SPOE/SPOD reserves with PPE and communications gear. This category funds the incremental Operating Tempo (OPTEMPO) costs above peacetime levels required to operate Coast Guard units that conduct or support the contingency operation. Incremental costs to operate PSU detachment at GTMO approximately $3K / day. Includes costs to maintain two Law Enforcement Detachments in theater at all times.

9. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 3.3 5,500 2,565 2,945 5,510 Other Supplies

a. Narrative Justification: This category funds other supplies and equipment, including the acquisition (via lease, rental, or purchase) of supplies and equipment required to equip and sustain Coast Guard forces during all phases of the contingency operation such as special protective gear for equipment or containers. Includes M14T Med Cal weapon for deployed boats and cutters, M240B Machine Gun, and replacement 9MM personal defense weapons for deployed personnel.


10. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 3.4 7,340 3,537 4,063 7,600 Facilities / Base Support

a. Narrative Justification: This category funds facilities/base support including the establishment, maintenance, and operation of billeting, camps, harbor facilities, staging areas, etc., similar to base operating support and real property maintenance. These costs include leases, rents, and utilities to operate bases, camps, relief centers, harbor facilities, and other operating / support facilities established to support the contingency operation. This category includes fortification and barriers and other physical security costs as well as the costs associated with services to protect forces at the facility. Also includes other base / center operating expenses such as food preparation / serving services, and storage and distribution warehousing. Increase from FY06 levels reflect growing contract costs.

11. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 3.5 22,810 10,149 44,509 54,658 Reconstitution

a. Narrative Justification: This category also funds reconstitution costs, including the cost to clean, inspect, maintain, replace, and restore equipment to the required condition at the conclusion of the contingency operation or unit deployment. Covers equipment organic to the participating unit and war reserve stocks prior to replacement into storage. Excludes the cost to transport equipment being repaired / restored. Includes costs associated with additional intermediate maintenance required on domestic patrol boats due to additional operational tempo backfilling for deployed assets, and funds to ready additional WPB – Large Patrol Boat for potential deployment as replacement cutter.

12. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 3.6 5,000 3,132 3,598 6,730 Command and Control

a. Narrative Justification: This category funds Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) costs, such as the cost of designing, engineering, installing, and maintaining C4I systems required to support the contingency operations such as: purchase and lease of communications equipment, lease of commercial satellites and long-haul lines; and collection, analysis, and dissemination of information or intelligence information. Increase from FY06 reflects costs associated with the installation and operation of Secure Internet Protocol Router (SIPR) chat.

13. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category/Subcategory 4.1 5,000 2,434 2,796 5,230 Airlift

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the cost of airlift Port Security Units, Maritime Safety Units, Law Enforcement Detachments, cutter crew, and support staff into/out of OEF / OIF theatre for scheduled rotations and transfers. Funding also includes VIP transportation for visiting deployed CG assets, and 125 C-130 flight hours for Coast Guard logistical support.


14. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Category / Subcategory 4.2 3,500 1,629 1,871 3,500 Sealift

a. Narrative Justification: Includes the sealift costs associated with the transport equipment to and from OIF / OEF theatre. Examples include Container Express (CONEX) box shipments to carry Port Security Boats and equipment. Estimate based upon previous shipment costs.

Total 175,000 90,000 120,293 210,293

1/ FY 2006 Actuals Estimated


Procurement

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE:

P-40 MARCH 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) 014300 EA-18G Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior ID To TotalYears Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Program

QUANTITY 1 1Net P-1 Cost ($M) B $75,000.000 $75,000.000Advance Proc ($M) B $0.000 $0.000Wpn Sys Cost ($M) B $75,000.000 $75,000.000Initial Spares ($M) B $0.000 $0.000Proc Cost ($M) B $75,000.000 $75,000.000Unit Cost ($M) $75,000.000 $75,000.000

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 1 OF 7CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED

0604269N 0204136N, 0604270N, 0204154N

DESCRIPTION:The EA-18G is designed to replace the EA-6B aircraft. The EA-18G’s electronic attack upgrades will meet EA-6B (with ALQ-218, ALQ-99, CSS-113) Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) capability to detect, identify, locate and suppress hostile emitters; provide enhanced connectivity to National, Theater and strike assets; and provide organic precision emitter targeting for employment of onboard suppression weapons (HARM) to fulfill operational requirements. The EA-18G will have the capability to operate autonomously or as a major node in a network centric operation. The performance of the aircraft iscompatible with the primary strike/fighter aircraft projected to be in the inventory in the 2010 time period, allowing it to be fully integrated into specific strike packages. It will also have the capacity to provide broad area coverage for extended periods of time to support numerous strikes or other air operations in a federated context. The EA-18G is a scaleable, flexible solution that facilitates “Task Organized” force structures. The task organized force structures employ adequate forces to accomplish a specific task while maintaining the operation and personnel tempo at acceptable levels. The EA-18G is being designed to perform a range of Electronic Warfare/Electronic Attack functions either simultaneously or independently. The man in the loop operation and advanced information display system will allow real time assessment of the tactical situation and the appropriate response executed in accordance with the rules of engagement.

BASIS FOR FY 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REQUEST:$75M of Supplemental Funding is requested to procure 1 additional EA-18G aircraft to replace an aircraft lost in combat operations.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $645. 172 $0 $75.000 $720.172

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System: DATE:(Page 1) EA-18G MARCH 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) B EA-18G / Y1CHTOTAL COST IN DOLLARS

COST ELEMENT OF COST Prior FY 2006 FY 2007CODE Years

Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost

Quantity 1

1 Airframe/CFE 37,477.000 37,477.0002 CFE Electronics 14,987.000 14,987.0003 GFE Electronics 1,897.000 1,897.0004 Engines/Eng Acc 4,231.500 8,463.0005 Armament 0.000 0.0006 Other GFE 719.000 719.0007 Rec Flyaway ECO 1,049.000 1,049.0008 Rec Flyaway Cost 64,592.000 64,592.000

9 Non-Recur Cost 6,500.00010 Ancillary Equip 3,908.00011 Other 0.00012 Total Flyaway 75,000.000

13 Airframe PGSE 0.00014 Engine PGSE 0.00015 Avionics PGSE 0.00016 Pec Trng Eq 0.00017 Pub/Tech Eq 0.00018 Prod Eng Supt 0.00019 Other ILS 0.00020 0.00021 Support Cost 0.000

22 Gross P-1 Cost 75,000.00023 Adv Proc Credit 0.00024 Net P-1 Cost 75,000.00025 Adv Proc CY 0.00026 Wpn Syst Cost 75,000.00027 Initial Spares 0.000

28 Procurement Cost 75,000.000DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 2 OF 7

CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED

FY 2009FY 2008

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System DATE:(Page 2) EA-18G APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SP-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) B EA-18G / Y1CH

COST ELEMENT OF COST To Complete TotalCODE Costs Costs

Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost

Quantity 1

1 Airframe/CFE 37,477.0002 CFE Electronics 14,987.0003 GFE Electronics 1,897.0004 Engines/Eng Acc 8,463.0005 Armament 0.0006 Other GFE 719.0007 Rec Flyaway ECO 1,049.0008 Rec Flyaway Cost 64,592.000

9 Non-Recur Cost 6,500.00010 Ancillary Equip 3,908.00011 Other 012 Total Flyaway 75,000.000

13 Airframe PGSE 0.00014 Engine PGSE 0.00015 Avionics PGSE 0.00016 Pec Trng Eq 0.00017 Pub/Tech Eq 0.00018 Prod Eng Supt 0.00019 Other ILS 0.00020 021 Support Cost 0.000



CLASSIFICATION: CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED

MARCH 2007

FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System A. DATE

EA-18G MARCH 2007B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) 014300 EA-18G Y1CH

CONTRACT DATE OF TECH DATECost Element/ QUANTITY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST DATA REVISIONSFISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY AVAILABLE AVAILABLE

($000) NOW ?AIRFRAME/CFE

FY 2007 Supplemental 1 52,464.000 NAVAIR N/A MYP/SS/FFP/EPA MDA, St Louis, MO Aug-07 Jun-10 Yes

D. REMARKS

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 4 OF 7 CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED


EA-18G MARCH 2007B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) 014300 EA-18G Y1CHCONTRACT DATE OF TECH DATE

Cost Element/ QUANTITY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST DATA REVISIONSFISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY AVAILABLE AVAILABLE

($000) NOW ? F-414-GE-400 ENGINE(2 PER A/C)

FY2007 Supplemental 2 4,231.489 NAVAIR TBD SS/FFP G.E. LYNN, MA Aug-07 Aug-09 Yes

D. REMARKS

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 5 OF 7 CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED

BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 Date March 2007Appropriation/Budget Activity Weapon System P-1 Item Nomenclature

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) EA-18G 014300 EA-18G PRODUCTION RATE Procurement Leadtimes

Manufacturer's ALT Prior ALT After Initial Reorder Unit ofItem Name and Location MSR ECON MAX to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total Measure

EA-18G McDonnell Douglas Aerospace 42 48 72 0 2 33 35 37 EMcDonnell Douglas Corp. (Boeing)

St. Louis, MO. 63165

FISCAL YEAR 2010ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B 2009 CALENDAR YEAR 2011

Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

E/A-18G 07 N 1 0 1 1 0


Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

Remarks:

DD Form 2445, JUL 87 (Previous editions are obsolete) P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 6 OF 7

Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule

CALENDAR YEAR 2010

CALENDAR YEAR 2012

FISCAL YEAR 2013

FISCAL YEAR 2011

BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 Date March 2007Appropriation/Budget Activity Weapon System P-1 Item Nomenclature

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) EA-18G 014300 EA-18G PRODUCTION RATE Procurement Leadtimes


F414-GE-400 ENGINE GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 84 120 144 0 5 27 24 29 E(EA-18G AIRCRAFT) LYNN, MA


Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

F414-GE-400 Installs 07 N 2 0 2 1 1 0


Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

Remarks:

DD Form 2445, JUL 87 (Previous editions are obsolete) P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 2 PAGE NO. 7 OF 7


CALENDAR YEAR 2009

CALENDAR YEAR 2011

FISCAL YEAR 2012

FISCAL YEAR 2010


P-40 FEBRUARY 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) 014500 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP)Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior ID To TotalYears Code FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Complete Program

QUANTITYNet P-1 Cost ($M) A $16.000 $16.000Advance Proc ($M) A $0.000 $0.000Wpn Sys Cost ($M) A $16.000 $16.000Initial Spares ($M) A $0.000 $0.000Proc Cost ($M) A $16.000 $16.000Unit Cost ($M)

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 5 PAGE NO. 1 OF 3CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED

0204136N 0604269N, 0305207N, 0604270N, 0204154N

Narrative DescriptionThe F/A-18E/F Naval Strike Fighter is a twin-engine, mid-wing, multi-mission tactical aircraft. F/A-18E/F can be missionized through selected use of external equipment to accomplish specific fighter or attack missions. This capability allows the Operational Commander more flexibility in employing his tactical aircraft in a dynamic scenario. The primary design mission for the F/A-18E/F is a strike fighter which includes the traditional applications, such as fighter escort and fleet air defense, combined with the attack applications, such as interdiction and close air support. Since the same airframe systems are used on attack missions as well as fighter missions, excellent fighter and self defense capability is retained.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $2,549.928 $0 $16.000 $2,565.928 Reason funds are required$16M of the Global War On Terrorism funding is requested to procure 35 Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) Infrared Markers, $6.16M; Infrared Marker allows Night Vision Device-equipped Forward Air Controllers (FAC) to pinpoint and confirm targets for the aircrew to employ weapons. Adding this capability to all ATFLIR pods will support the requirement to support FACs to identify targets during night close air support; Imaging, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR); and force protection missions. This funding will provide for IR Marker insertion in 35 of the pods that are funded for procurement in FY07 but currently not funded for IR Marker (for forward fit in FA-18E/Fs in production).

Additionally, this request will procure 41 ATFLIR Datalinks, $9.84M; Adding this capability to all ATFLIR pods will support the CENTCOM requirement for FLIR video data links. CENTCOM has a requirement for 550 ROVER III terminals to support FAC to identify targets during close air support, ISR, and force protection missions. Without Data Link capability in all ATFLIR pods, CNAF will be challenged to support CENTCOM FAC requirements for FLIR video data link operations. This funding will provide for datalink insertion in 41 of the pods that are funded for procurement in FY07 but currently not funded for data links.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System: DATE:(Page 1) F/A-18E/F FEBRUARY 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) A F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP)/Y1CFTOTAL COST IN DOLLARS

COST ELEMENT OF COST Prior FY 2006 FY 2007CODE Years

Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost

Quantity 0

1 Airframe/CFE 0.000 0.0002 CFE Electronics 0.000 0.0003 GFE Electronics 0.000 0.0004 Engines/Eng Acc 0.000 0.0005 Armament 0.000 0.0006 Other GFE 0.000 0.0007 Rec Flyaway ECO 0.000 0.0008 Rec Flyaway Cost 0.000 0.000

9 Non-Recur Cost 0.00010 Ancillary Equip 9,570.00011 Other 012 Total Flyaway 9,570.000

13 Airframe PGSE 0.00014 Engine PGSE 0.00015 Avionics PGSE 0.00016 Pec Trng Eq 0.00017 Pub/Tech Eq 466.00018 Prod Eng Supt 574.00019 Other ILS 5,390.00020 021 Support Cost 6,430.000


28 Procurement Cost 16,000.000DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 5 PAGE NO. 2 OF 3Notes:

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

FY 2009FY 2008

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System DATE:(Page 2) F/A-18E/F APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUP-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/ Combat Aircraft, (BA-1) A F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP)/Y1CF

COST ELEMENT OF COST To Complete TotalCODE Costs Costs

Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost

Quantity 0

1 Airframe/CFE 0.0002 CFE Electronics 0.0003 GFE Electronics 0.0004 Engines/Eng Acc 0.0005 Armament 0.0006 Other GFE 0.0007 Rec Flyaway ECO 0.0008 Rec Flyaway Cost 0.000

9 Non-Recur Cost 0.00010 Ancillary Equip 9,570.00011 Other 012 Total Flyaway 9,570.000

13 Airframe PGSE 0.00014 Engine PGSE 0.00015 Avionics PGSE 0.00016 Pec Trng Eq 0.00017 Pub/Tech Eq 466.00018 Prod Eng Supt 574.00019 Other ILS 5,390.00020 021 Support Cost 6,430.000




FEBRUARY 2007

FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013


DATE:

017800, UH-1Y/AH-1Z

Prior Years ID Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014Total

ProgramQuantity B 0Net P-1 Cost ($M) 50.000 50.000Advance Proc ($M) .000WPN Sys Cost ($M) 50.000 50.000Initial Spares ($M) .000Proc Cost ($M) 50.000 50.000Unit Cost ($M)

FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 375.2 68.6 50.0 493.8

(Dollars in Thousands)

February 2007

0206131M

P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Other Related Program Elements

BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEETP-40

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY

Program Element for Code B Items:AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,NAVY/BA 1

Description: Mission Description: The mission of the AH-1Z attack helicopter is to provide rotary w ing close air support, anti-armor, armed escort, armed/visual reconnaissance, anti-helicopter and point air defense and fire support coordination during day/night conditions. The mission of the UH-1Y utility helicopter is to provide command and control and combat assault support during during day/night and reduced w eather conditions. The UH-1Y/AH-1Z remanufacture program w as structured as a recapitalization effort. Major modif ications include: a new 4-bladed rotor system w ith semiautomatic blade fold of the new composite rotor blades, new performance matched transmissions, a new 4-bladed tail rotor and drive system, upgraded landing gear, and pylon structural modifications. Both aircraft w ill also incorporate common, modernized and fully integrated cockpits/avionics that w ill reduce operator w ork load and improve situational aw areness and safety. The UH-1Y/AH-1Z aircraft w ill have increased maneuverablility, speed, and payload capability. Additionally, the AH-1Z w ill upgrade the current Night Targeting FLIR system to a 3rd generation, staring, focal plane array FLIR that w ill signif icantly extend autonomous w eapons engagement ranges. FY07 NRE funding procures draw ings, tooling, engineering support and sets up the production line to produce up to 40 Build New AH-1Zs.

Relationship to GWOT: Half of the H-1 fleet is currently deployed in support of GWOT and are f lying in excess of the w eapon system planning document. The UH-1N f leet is underpow ered and has an average age of 35 years. Both the UH-1N and AH-1W operate in the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) conducting contingency operations in support of GWOT. The replacement of the current f leet of H-1s w ith the UH-1Y and AH-1Z is a top concern of Marine Corps leadership and needs to be done expeditiously.

Funding provided for NRE efforts w ill support the requiremement for Z build new . By manufacturing new AH-1Zs, AH-1Ws w ill not be draw n dow n to remanufacture. In addition to keeping high demand AH-1Ws fighting in GWOT operations, the replacement aircraft w ill supplement these operations w hen they are manufactured instead of having to pull them out of combat w hile being remanned.

Totals may not add due to roundingDD Form 2454, Jun 86

P-1 Shopping List Item No 9Page 1 of 2

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System DATE:UH-1Y/AH-1Z Feb-07

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREAIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,NAVY/BA 1 B UH-1Y/AH-1Z

Dollars in Thousands

Cost Element of CostSummary Total A/C

QTY: 0 0Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Total Cost

1 AIRFRAME/CFE .0002 CFE ELECTRONICS3 GFE ELECTRONICS .0004 ENGINES / ENGINE ACC .0005 ARMAMENT .0006 INSTRUMENTS7 OTHER GFE .0008 REC FLYAWAY ECO .0009 Rec Flyaway Cost .000

10 NON-RECURRING 50,000.000 50,000.00011 ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT .00012 MISCELLANEOUS13 Total Flyaway Cost .000

14 AIRFRAME PGSE15 ENGINE PGSE16 AVIONICS PGSE17 PEC TRNG EQ18 PUBS / TECH DATA19 OTHER ILS20 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT21 FIELD ACTIVITIES22 PRODUCTION ENG SUPPORT23 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT24 Support Cost

25 Gross P-1 Cost 50,000.000 50,000.00026 Adv Proc Credit27 Net P-1 Cost 50,000.000 50,000.00028 Adv Proc CY29 Weapon System Cost 50,000.000 50,000.00030 Initial Spares .00031 Procurement Cost 50,000.000 50,000.000

FY 2007

DD FORM 2446, JUN 86Totals may not add due to rounding

P-1 Shopping List Item No 9Page 2 of 2 (Exhibit P-5)



BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

PRIOR YEARS ID Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITYCOST (In Millions) 178.6 178.6

019-79 ALQ-99 PODS 31.2 31.2032-85 EA-6B STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS 43.5 43.5042-93 BLOCK 89A AVIONICS I 0.3 0.3001-01 ICAP III 97.7 97.7005-03 MIDS/LINK 16 5.9 5.9TOTAL 178.6 178.6*Totals may not add due to rounding

FY 2006

February 2007

051100, EA-6 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 TOTALFY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

TO COMPLETE

DESCRIPTION: This GWOT Supplemental funds modifications to the EA-6B aircraft supporting the efforts ofOperation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Funding would provide for the continueddevelopment and upgrades for ICAP III Systems, Low Band Transmitters (LBT), USQ-113, Mission Planning, NightVision Devices (NVD), ALQ-99, and ICAP II.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

$48,786 $0 $178.495 $227.281*Totals may not add due to rounding Reason funds are required:

Low Band Transmitter (LBT) $25.2M - Funding is required to accelerate the procurement and delivery of LBT to deployed forces who are currently providing 24/7 GWOT coverage. The normal POM process was not able to respond quickly enough to account for this urgent requirement and the existing funding shortfall in FY08. If not funded, then the continued reliance on limited inventory of modified transmitters will negatively impact the ability to counter current asymmetric threats and provide protection to coalition forces in continuous and direct contact with enemy forces.

LBT HPDTS I-Level CASS Station $5.06M - GWOT support has required more sustained jamming with LBT than projected, and resulted in higher system failure rates. Deployment of a High Power Device Test Set (HPDTS) for LBT transmitters will provide Intermediate level repair capability that is critical in meeting availability projections of this critical Force Protection asset. The ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System availability of low band transmitters is already below Full Rate Production (FRP) entitlements and the deferral of funding will exacerbate the situation and delay recovery time when funding may become available. This funding request represents the amount of additional work required to support Early Operational Capability (EOC) of LBT transmitters.

ALQ-99 Universal Exciter $0.934M - A defect found within the UEU MIL-STD-1553 interface firmware causes the UEU to fail making or clearing jamming assignments with no alert to aircrew. This results in prior assignments continuing to radiate leading to a potenital jamming fratricide condition or failure to create the requested jamming assignment leading to degraded mission effectiveness. This problem has been documented to occur on nearly every flight during recent VX-23 testing and is impacting GWOT missions today and will impact future operational taskings if not corrected. The identified fix requires installation of a new "write-once" programmable read only memory (PROM) chip with updated firmware. Failure to fund this issue will result in continued degraded EA-6B mission performance and potential jamming fratricide of friendly communications signals during GWOT coverage.

USQ-113 Enhanced Jamming Capabilities Upgrade $18.321M - Proposed upgrade to the USQ-113 communications jamming system would modify existing hardware to enhance the jamming effectiveness of the system by increasing the number of modulation types from three to twelve. These new modulation types are being utilized by enemy comms systems which the current system can not generate. Upgrade would enable the USQ-113 to be effective against high priority targets that the current system is ineffective against. OIF/OEF Fleet Squadron's reports state a "definite need for increased (comms EA) jamming capability...(and that they are)...limited in comms EA mission capability...(and) numerous requests for comms EA support difficult to execute due to USQ-113 system limitations". Further classified discussions of system/threat specifics and CENTCOM/CJTF-180 reports available on request. If not funded, required enhancement of the USQ-113 will not occur and the effectiveness of the system would decrease as new threats arise.

Asterisk (*) indicates amount value less than $51K


P-1 Shopping List Item No. 25Page 1 of 11





P-40 February 2007

Aircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications 051100, EA-6 SERIES

EA-6B USQ-113 Commonality Upgrade (including Analysis Card Removal) $6.868M - Proposed upgrade to the USQ-113 communications jamming system brings up to 61 older configuration of USQ-113(V)3s to the latest version (V)4, which includes the FY05 funded dual transmit mode incorporated into the last lot of 25 systems (goal: total of 86 common USQ-113(V)4s). Upgrade includes a jam toggle mode switch package and other obsolescence upgrades. FY05 funding enhanced jamming capability but did not provide sufficient funds to upgrade the entire inventory of USQ-113s. This upgrade to remaining 61 older systems would provide similar capability to all aircraft as well as improved reliability and reduce the logistics burden on the fleet by making all USQ-113 systems common. If not funded, then only 25 systems will have the upgraded capability (from the FY05 Supplemental received). OIF/OEF Fleet Squadron's reports state a "definite need for increased (comms EA) jamming capability...(and that they are)...limited in comms EA mission capability... (and) numerous requests for comms EA support difficult to execute due to USQ-113 system limitations." Further classified discussions of system/threat specifics and CENTCOM/CJTF-180 reports available on request.

EA-6B TACAN Replacement $5.3M - The ARN-84 TACAN cannot operate in its original configuration in a MIDS environment. Funding would replace a total of 80 aircraft requirement of the ARN-84 TACAN with the ARN-153 TACAN. A functional TACAN is required for safe flight, navigation and return to base, especially in an operationally hazardous environment such as OIF/OEF. If not funded, it is anticipated that reductions in EA-6B Operational Availability (Ao) and an increase in EA-6B Fleet Maintenance Manhours and the costs associated with the Flying Hour accounts for Depot Repairables (AVDLR) and Consumables (AFM) as the obsolete ARN-84 system continues to age. This ultimately means a drop in the EA-6B Aircraft Ready for Tasking (RFT) due to the anticipated reductions in the ARN-84 Tacan System Reliability and increased Dynamic Cycle Time required to repair. The current ARN-84 has only 84 hours Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) whereas the ARN-153 has a current MTBF of around 1200 hours based upon S-3B data for the last year.

EA-6B CNS/ATM (GPS approach capability) $7.87M - The current EA-6B navigation system does not allow for self contained non-precision approaches. The EA-6B is limited to conducting instrument approaches to facilities which have TACAN, PAR radar or ILS systems. Given the diverse operational environment of the EA-6B in support of our GWOT mission a self contained GPS approach capability would greatly increase the combat flexibility of the EA-6B in current and future operations. If funding is not provided, we are limited to conducting instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at airfields with navigational approach capabilities.

EA-6B ICAP II Blue Force Tracker $4.164M - Current GWOT missions require EA-6B aircraft to provide force protection to multiple ground forces. IOT locate these forces on the ground, Blue Force Tracker (BFT) messages have been activated on the MATT receiver and are displayed on the E-Board display (kneeboard computer) in the EA-6B ICAP II aft cockpit. MATT display software on the E-Board was not designed to provide detailed map information and is limited to shore lines and country boarders. This requires the crew to manually correlate with reference to a navigational chart or reference to visual observation outside the cockpit. Current GWOT employment requires EA-6B aircrew situational awareness of ground force locations relative to towns, highways and other geographic features to properly position the aircraft and jamming patterns. Requested GWOT funding is required to develop the software engineering change proposal that would develop the Standard Tactical Receive Equipment Display update and incorporate Falconview. The ECP would be available in 6 months after receipt of funds. Installation would be performed at the organizational level and could begin 11 months after funds received. All fielded ICAP II aircraft could be updated within 6 months. Failure to fund this upgrade will result in continued high cockpit workload contributing to risk the EA-6B arriving late on station or be inadequately positioned to provide force protection resulting in loss of EA-6B mission effectiveness and additional risk to ground personnel.

EA-6B MATT Block 2 to Block 3 Upgrade $0.945M - Currently there are 73 MATT Block 3s + 12 MATT Block 3 spares in Inventory. Upgrade of an additional 35 MATT Block 2s to the MATT Block 3 configuration will permit maintaining logistics commonality for 108 A/C. Final delivery of MATT Block 3s could be expected approximately 11 months after receipt of funds given planned delivery of 2 units per week from vendor. ECP updates are not required for procurement of additional quantities of Block 3s. OIF/OEF Fleet Squadron's reports state a "definite need for increased situational awareness and for Blue Force Tracking data in the cockpit". (Report available on request). Early testing has indicated that the MATT Block 3 configuration supports reprogramming which will likely enable compliance with new COMSEC/broadcast requirements for the remaining life of the EA-6Bs. As the aircraft are retired, MATT Block 3 units will then be installed in the EA-18G to provide its SATCOM receive capability. If not funded, only 73 out of 108 aircraft will have the current MATT Block 3 upgrade preventing an increased situational awareness required by fleet forces.

EA6B Night Vision Device (NVD) Compatible AOA Indexer $0.273M - As a previously funded GWOT issue, PMA 234 installed A-6E NVD angle of attack (AOA) indexers into deployed Navy and Marine Corps EA-6B aircraft in order to conduct offensive operations utilizing NVIS goggles and to be compatible with other aircraft operating in the AOR. AOA indexers provide vital information for the safe operation of the aircraft in the take off and landing environment. A-6E components were initially used as a cost reduction initiative as A-6E test articles were available and previously qualified. Upon operational use, we determined that while the indexers met the NVD requirement, there are safety issues with "wash out" and readability during day light operations. This funding would be used to qualify and procure AOA indexers that meet both NVD and daylight readability specifications for the EA-6B. If not funded, this places the aircrew at a potentially increased risk during daylight operations do to the safety issue of "wash out".








P-40 February 2007

Aircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications 051100, EA-6 SERIES

Seven (7) Additional EA-6B ICAP III Systems $99.4M - Funding would providefor the procurement of additional ICAP III ALQ-218 systems to upgrade EA-6B ICAP II 89A aircraft. This depot level mod provides ALQ-218 systems, the corresponding MIDS Link-16 systems, and installation costs. These ECPs are all approved and no further engineering is required to install these systems. The ICAP III ALQ-218 system with MIDS provides improved information and battle management capability using new integrated color displays and controls for improved human machine interface, enhanced target detection, identification, geo-location, navigation, situational awareness, enhanceemitter processing speeds, multi-source emitter correlation, and a selective reactive jamming capability over a wide frequency range. The MIDS Link-16 system allows the Prowler to participate in the Link-16 tactical data link network and provides, real-time or near real-time situational awareness including blue Force Tracker data inside the cockpit to pass Time-critical Targeting (TCT) information to other strike aircrafand ground forces. The EA-6B ICAP III system is a significant improvement in readiness, both from an operational and maintainability viewpoint. The ICAP III 218 system has increased the aircraft reliability of the EA-6B to a MFHBOMF 40 plus hrs compared to ICAP II MFHBOMF of 9 hrs. Budgeted funds provide 14 ICAP III systems of which 10 (funded in 2003) have delivered to the fleet and have already deployed twice to Iraq. Carrier Wing Pacific is asking Chief of Naval Air Force to consider a third deployment by moving the FRS aircraft into a third squadron to deploy in 2007. These more capable aircraft will be needed to support the expeditionary mission for the foreseeable future and will enable USMC to transition to a single TMS. The POR calls for the USMC to transition to ICAP III as Navy transitions to the EA-18G. If not funded, additional ICAP III and MIDS systems will not be procured denying the fleet forces operating in OIF/OEF the increased capabilities requested to deter an ever evolving and increasing threat.

USQ-113(V)4 Integration into EA-6B ICAP III $1.36M - The current implementation of the ICAP III only enables operation of the baseline USQ-113(V)3 system. Proposed upgrade would provide the NRE necessary to integrate the USQ-113(V)4 communications jamming system into all EA-6B ICAP III aircraft via a system software update. Development of the USQ-113(V)4 was funded by a previous supplemental request and is a drop in replacement for ICAP II, however, sufficient funding was not available to both update USQ capability as well as integrate in ICAP III. The (V)4 doubles the number of targeted systems the USQ-113 can engage simultaneously by providing dual transmit mode functionality. Not funding this upgrade would prevent ICAP III aircraft from using the updated USQ-113 to be effective against high priority targets that the current ICAP III USQ-113 system is ineffective against. OIF/OEF Fleet Squadron's reports state a "definite need for increased (comms EA) jamming capability...(and that they are)...limited in comms EA mission capability...(and) numerous requests for comms EA support difficult to execute due to USQ-113 system limitations." Further classified discussions of system/threat specifics and CENTCOM/CJTF-180 reports available on request.

JMPS Library $2.8M - The JMPS Mission Planning system is the only method for transferring mission data to the EA-6B in the very near future. As the current threat changes, development of the JMPS mission planner must reflect the changing role of the aircraft mission in order to provide mission essential data to the AN/ALQ-99 TJS which provides protection to coalition air and ground forces in continuous and direct contact with enemy forces. If not funded, the ability to develop the JMPS mission planner, will be limited to the bare minimum of planned development, and such will not be able to adequately address the ever-changing mission of the EA-6B in support of troops on the ground. To more adequately develop this crucial mission planner, will allow greater flexibility for EA-6B aricrew to plan for missions in support of coalition troops on the ground.






Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: TYPE MODIFICATION:

FINANCIAL PLAN: (TOA, $ IN MILLIONS)FISCAL YEAR

QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $

RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS (A KITS)

INSTALLATION KITS N/R

INSTALL EQUIPMENT (B KITS)

ALQ 99 BAND TWT IM

BAND 9/10 GFE

BAND 9/10 RADOME

BAND 9/10 TRANSMITTER

LOWBAND TRANSMITTER 21 25.2 21 25.2

PAO TRANSMITTER MOD

REPAIR OF GFE(UEU)

UNIVERSAL EXCITER UPGRADE 0.9 .9

INSTALL EQUIPMENT N/R

ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP 5.1 5.1

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT

INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORT

INSTALLATION COST

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 21 31.2 21 31.2sk (*) indicates amount value less than $51K

Note 1. $25.2M GWOT Supplemental for EA-6B Low Band Transmitter Install Equip (B Kits)

Note 2. $0.934M GWOT Supplemental for EA-6B ALQ-99 Universal Exciter Install Equip (Bkits)

Note 3. $5.06M GWOT Supplemental for EA-6B HPDTS ( High Power Device Test Set) I-Level CASS Station Support Equip

ALQ-99 PODS( OSIP 019-79 )

Reliability/Mission CapabilityEA-6 SERIES

PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2013 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: UNIVERSAL EXCITER UPGRADE:The Universal Exciter Upgrade (UEU) is the weapons replacable assembly within the ALQ-99 aircraft mounted jamming pod that creates the EA-6B jamming waveform signals. It is not installed in the aircraft,rather in each jamming pod. Aircraft quantity or installation is not applicable. The pods are configured at the organizational level and loaded similar to ordnance. There are 467 UEUs in enventory and theywill also be used on the EA-18G when it arrives. ALQ-99 Exciters are Weapons Replaceable Assemblies that are readily removed and installed in the ALQ-99 Pod, thus noinstallation effort/funding is associated with this program. This capability will be available for all EA-6B/EA-18G aircraft, which includes four Naval Air Reserve aircraft.

LOW BAND TRANSMITTER:The Low Band Transmitter (LBT) is a replacement for the lower band AN/ALQ-99 transmitters that have found new and greatly expanded employment in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) operations, providingprotection to Coalition air and ground forces in continuous and direct contact with enemy forces. LBT combines the functionality of the modified transmitters into a single highly reliable solid statetransmitter increasing both availability and mission effectiveness. The LBT will double MTBF and will allow the EA-6B to carry additional transmitters because of its wider bandwidth to counter the everchanging threat. GWOT support has required more sustained jamming than projected, and resulted in higher system failure rates. In response to the increasing force protection requirement, an EarlyOperational Capability (EOC) for LBT was met in Aug 2006. The LBT is an O-Level remove and replace item. This capability will be available for all EA-6B/EA-18G aircraft, which includes four Naval AirReserve aircraft.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELopment:




CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:


EA-6B STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS( OSIP 032-85 )

Safety of FlightEA-6 SERIES

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:EA-6B USQ-113:Proposed upgrade to the USQ-113 communications jamming system brings the older configuration of USQ-113(V)3s to the latest version (V)4, which includes the FY05 funded dual transmit mode incorporated into the last lot of systems. Upgrade includes a jam toggle mode switch package and other obsolescence upgrades. FY05 funding enhanced jamming capability but did not provide sufficient funds to upgrade the entire enventory of USQ-113. This upgrade to older systems would provide similar capability to all aircaft as well as improved reliability and reduce the logistics burden on the fleet by making all USQ-113 systems common. The proposed upgrade will also remove ineffective and unused analysis circuit cards from the USQ-113(V)3 communications jamming system to improve reliability, reduce repair turn around time, remove parts obsolescence issues and improve Ao. The total number of USQ-113 systems is less than the total number of EA-6B aircraft. Squadrons typically are requried to cross deck systems as they deploy. The NRE for this effort is being completed under a prior-funded GWOT effort. Upgrade of these additional units are within scope of that production effort. This is an OEM level modification that will be performed using a rotatable pool.BLUE FORCE TRACKER:Current GWOT missions require EA-6B aircraft to provide force protection to multiple ground forces. IOT locate these forces on the ground, Blue Force Tracker (BFT) messages have been activated on the MATT receiver and are displayed on the E-Board display (kneeboard computer) in the EA-6B ICAP II aft cockpit. MATT display software on the E-Board was not designed to provide detailed map information and is limited to shore lines and country boarders. This requires the crew to manually correlate with reference to a navigational chart or reference to visual observation outside the cockpit. Current GWOT employment requires EA-6B aircrew situational awareness of ground force locations relative to towns, highways and other geographic features to properly position the aircraft and jamming patterns. Additionally, the current implementation of the BFT display requires selection of each unit reported on BFT to query the unit identifier in order to locate the unit requiring EA-6B protection further delaying position updates. Rapid identification of the unit and its location is vital to providing timely EA support for ground forces requiring force protection.MATT BLOCK 2 TO BLOCK 3 UPGRADE:EA-6B Airborne Electronic Attack aircraft are being heavily employed in GWOT missions supporting air and ground commanders in hostile areas. Aircraft with obsolete Block 2 Multi-Mission Advanced Tactical Terminal (MATT) SATCOM receivers suffer degraded situational awareness and lack Blue Force Tracking capability critical to deconfliction of forces to prevent fratricide. These units also experience significantly lower reliability than units with upgraded Block 3 MATT configurations. These funds will provide updates for 35 aircraft (73 of 108 MATTs have already been updated) to provide increased situational awareness to EA-6B aircrew including ELINT, SENSOREP, and Blue Force tracking data essential for OIF/OEF.CNS/ATM (GPS APPROACH CAPABILITY):The current EA-6B navigation system does not allow for self contained non-precision approaches. The EA-6B is limited to conducting instrument approaches to facilities which have TACAN, PAR radar or ILS systems. Given the diverse operational environment of the EA-6B in support of our GWOT mission a self contained GPS approach capability would greatly increase the combat flexibility of the EA-6B in current and future operations. This CNS/ATM upgrade would allow the EA-6B to conduct GPS only non-precision approaches world wide with only the support of current Flight Planning publications. The funding will provide sufficient software only for 108 Operational Combat Aircraft that will fly in OIF and OEF. Current operations have USMC, Navy expeditionary & Reserves and Navy carrier squadrons (under split deployment) conducting operations in OIF/OEF. TACAN REPLACEMENT:This effort is to replace 80 aircraft of the ARN-84 with the ARN-153. The ARN-153 is comparable in interface requirements to the ARN-84 and requires no software upgrades, enabling installation at the organizational level. The current ARN-84 TACAN is a major reliability, manhour, and AVDLR driver in the EA-6B aircraft, ranking among the top 10 composite degraders for at least the last five years. The receiver-transmitter had a mere 66.35 Mean Flight Hours Between Failure (MFHBF) between October 1998 and April 2005. Though there are a large number of the current configuration available in supply, the reliability is such that valuable manpower is diverted for constant removal, replacement and repair of units, during which removal periods the aircraft is non-mission capable. A functional TACAN is required for safe flight, navigation and return to base, especially in an operationally hazardous environment. Further, the ARN-84 cannot operate in its original configuration in a MIDS environment. The ARN-153 is currently in use in various aircraft platforms for the USN, USMC, and USA, vice the ARN-84 which is currently installed only on the EA-6Bs.






FINANCIAL PLAN: (TOA, $ IN MILLIONS) EA-6B STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS (OSIP 032-85)\

FISCAL YEAR


RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

PRIOR YR (A Kits)

2ND EGI/ ASN-130A

AIRCRAFT WIRING UPGRADE 80 5.3 80 5.3

AN/USQ-113 KITS

DFCS

FLIGHT CONTROL

HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS UPGRADE

OUTER WING PANEL

OUTER WING PANEL (SUPP)

SDRS Kit

USQ-113 EXT A KITS (SUPP) 86 15.5 86 15.5

WING CENTER SECTION

INSTALLATION KITS N/R 5.0 5.0

INSTALL EQUIPMENT

PRIOR YR EQUIPMENT (B Kits)

ASN-130A REPLACEMENT/2ND EGI

DFCS

EJECTION SEAT

MISSION REPROGRAMMING

POWER PC INTEGRATION

USQ-113 EXT B KITS (SUPP)

USQ-113 TOG B KITS (SUPP)

INSTALL EQUIPMENT N/R 13.0 13.0

ECO * *

DATA 0.1 .1

TRAINING EQUIP 3 1.4 3 1.4

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT 3.1 3.1


INSTALLATION COST

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 169 43.4 169 43.4


Note 1. $18.321 M for GWOT supplemental USQ-113 Enhance Jamming breakout: $10.621 M Installation Kits, $4.98M Install Kits NRE, $5.0K ECO, $84.2K Data, $747.4K Training Equip (includes 3 Lab Upgrades), $2.15M Other support for Engineering and testing.

Note 2. $6.868M for GWOT Supplemental USQ 113 (v)4 Commonality breakout: $5.2M Installation Kits, $.006M ECO, $.055M Data, $.612M Training Equip ( Includes Lab Upgrades), $.995M Other Support for Engineering

Note 3. $5.3M GWOT Supplemental EA-6B TACAN Replacement. $5.3M Installation kit Aircraft Wiring Upgrade

Note 4. $7.87M GWOT Supplemental EA-6B CNS/ATM (GPS approach capability). $7.87M Install Equip Non Recurring Engineering

Note 5. $4.164M GWOT Supplemental EA-6B ICAP II Blue Force Tracker. $4.164M Install Equipment Non Recurring Enginnering

Note 6. $.945M GWOT Supplemental for EA-6B MATT Block 2 to Block 3 Upgrade. $.945M Install Equipment Non Recurring Engineering

FY 2013 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES:






Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

BLOCK 82 TO 89A CABLES OWP

BLOCK 82 TO 89A KIT

BLOCK 89 TO 89A KIT

INSTALLATION KITS N/R 100 0.2 100 .2

INSTALL EQUIPMENT

AN/AYK-14

ARC210 EQUIP

ARC210, USQ-113

BLOCK 82 TO 89A EQUIP

BLOCK 89 TO 89A

CIU/ENCODER/CDNU

EGI

NVD EQUIP (Supplemental)

NVD EQUIP


ECO

DATA * *

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 100 0.3 100 .3


Note 1 - $.273 for GWOT Supplemental Night Vision Device (NVD) Compatible AOA Indexer - .233 for Installation Kits NRE and $.040 for Update of Pubs

Safety of Flight/ReliabilityEA-6 SERIES

BLOCK 89A AVIONICS I( OSIP 042-93 )

PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 TOTALFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TO COMPLETE

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: NIGHT VISION DEVICES (NVD):A-6E NVD angle of attack (AOA) indexers are deployed into the EA-6B aircraft in order to conduct covert (aided NVD) take-off and landings utilizing NVIS goggles as a forceprotection measure. AOA indexers provide vital information for the safe operation of the aircraft in the take-off and landing configuration. A-6E components were used as a cost reduction initiative as A-6Etest articles were available and previously qualified. A-6E indexers meet the NVD requirement, but they are unreadable in direct sunlight. NVD are O-level installs.







Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

ICAP III 7 81.4 7 81.4


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT

INSTALL EQUIPMENT N/R 0.5 .5

ECO * *

DATA 0.1 .1

TRAINING EQUIP 1.9 1.9


ILS



INSTALLATION COST 8.8 7 8.8

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 7 97.7 7 7 97.7


Note 1. $99.4M GWOT Supplemental for Seven (7) Additional EA-6B ICAP III Systems. (Includes $93.52M for ICAP III and $5.88M for MIDS in OSIP 005-03). ICAP III Breakout: $81.42M Install Kits, $1.0M Install Kits N/R, $1.9M Training Equip., $.380M Other Support, $8.82 Install.

Note 2. $1.36M GWOT Supplemental for Upgrade of software to integrate the USQ-113 (v)4 communications jamming system into ICAP III breakout: $.492M Install Kit Non Recurring Engineering, $.005M ECO, $.121M Data, $.012M Training Equip, $.730M Other Support including Engineering and testing.

Note 3. $2.8M GWOT Supplemental for Mission Planning for JMPS Mission Planner (falls under Support Equipment in the current ICAP III Budget).


ICAP III( OSIP 001-01 )


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: ICAP III:The ICAP III ALQ-218 system provides improved information and battle management capability using new integrated color displays and controls for improved human machine interface, enhanced target detection,identification, geo-location, navigation, situational awareness, enhanced emitter processing speeds, multi-source emitter correlation, and a selective reactive jamming capability over a wide frequencyrange. The ICAP III transformational EW capability and situational awareness can effectively provide AEA support and protection for our air and ground forces against both current and emerging threats, boththe current asymmetric threats we now face in GWOT operations as well as the evolving “traditional” threats our forces will face in the future.MISSION PLANNING:Replacement of the Tactical EA-6B Mission System (TEAMS) with the Joint Mission Planning Systems (JMPS) and associated EA-6B Unique Planning Components (UPC). As the current GWOT threat changes,development ofthe JMPS mission planner must reflect the changing role of the aircraft mission in order to provide mission essential data to the AN/ALQ-99 TJS which provides protection to Coalition air and ground forcesin continuous and direct contact with enemy forces.USQ-113:One major design feature of EA-6B ICAP III is integration of the USQ-113 system within the ICAP III control and display group. The current implementation of the ICAP III only enables operation of thebaseline USQ-113(V)3 system. Proposed upgrade would provide the NRE necessary to integrate the USQ-113(V)4 communications jamming system into all EA-6B ICAP III aircraft via a system software update.Development of the USQ-113(V)4 was funded by a previous supplemental request and is a drop in replacement for ICAP II, however, sufficient funding was not available to both update USQ capability as well asintegrate in ICAP III. The USQ-113(V)4 doubles the number of targeted systems the USQ-113 can engage simultaneously by providing dual transmit mode functionality. A software update to ICAP III is necessaryto integrate the functionality of the USQ-113(V)4 into the LAN-based, integrated color displays to enable the EA-6B ICAP III to be effective against changing high-priority targets that the currentUSQ-113(V)3 system is ineffective against. Intent is to match the most capable USQ system with most capable EA-6B aircraft. This is a software only update and therefore independent of aircraft quantity oradditional ICAP III kit procurement. The software development will begin one month after receipt of funding. All ICAP III aircraft will be updated within 6 months of software delivery.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: A full rate production contract for ICAP III was awarded 2nd quarter FY06.






Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: EA-6B Series Modifications MODIFICATION TITLE:

INSTALLATION INFORMATION:

METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION:

ADMINISTRATIVE LEADTIME: Months PRODUCTION LEADTIME: Months

CONTRACT DATES: FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

DELIVERY DATE: FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

($ in Millions)

Cost: PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TO COMPLETE

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

PRIOR YEARS () kits 0 0.0

FY 2006 () kits 0 0.0

FY 2007 (18) kits 8.8 7 18 8.8

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE 0 0.0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 8.8 0 0.0 7 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 18 8.8

Installation Schedule

FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 7

Out 7

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 7

Out 7

Mar 07

Mar 09

FY 2007

Total

N/A

ICAP III( OSIP 001-01 )

Commercial

N/A

245

N/A

N/A

TOTAL

To Complete Total

N/A

FY 2012 FY 2013

PRIOR YEARS

N/A






Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

MIDS A Kits 7 0.2 7 .2

MIDS B Kits 7 4.2 7 4.2


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST 1.5 14 18 1.5



Note 1. $99.4M GWOT Supplemental for Seven (7) Additional EA-6B ICAP III Systems. (Includes $93.52M for ICAP III in OSIP 01-01 and $5.88M for MIDS). MIDS Breakdown: MIDS A Kits: $0.2205M, MIDS B Kits: $4.1895M, Installation Cost $1.47M.

Note 2. $128.7M GWOT Supplemental for Nine (9) Additional EA-6B ICAP III Systems. (Includes $120.0M for ICAP III in Osip 01-01 and $8.7M for MIDS). MIDS Breakdown: MIDS A Kits: $0.2835M, MIDS B Kits: $5.400M, Other Support: $1.1165M, Installation Cost $1.89M.

Note 3. $34.0M GWOT Supplemental for Two (2) Additional EA-6B ICAP III Systems is a USMC requirement. (Includes $31.6M for ICAP III in Osip 01-01 and $2.4M for MIDS). MIDS Breakdown: MIDS A Kits: $0.064M, MIDS B Kits: $1.136M, Other Support: $0.800M, Installation Cost $0.400M.

MIDS/LINK 16( OSIP 005-03 )



DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: The MIDS Link-16 system allows the Prowler to participate in the Link-16 tactical data link network and provides, real-time or near real-time situational awarenessincluding blue Force Tracker data inside the cockpit to pass Time-critical Targeting (TCT) information to other strike aircraft and ground forces.The ICAP III ALQ-218 system with MIDS provides improved information and battle management capability using new integrated color displays and controls for improved human machine interface, enhanced targetdetection, identification, geo-location, navigation, situational awareness, enhanced emitter processing speeds, multi-source emitter correlation, and a selective reactive jamming capability over a widefrequency range.







Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: MODIFICATION TITLE:






($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits 0 0.0

FY 2006 () kits 0 0.0

FY 2007 (18) kits 1.5 14 18 1.5

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE 0 0.0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.5 0 0.0 14 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 18 1.5


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 7 7

Out 7 7

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 14

Out 14

N/A

TOTAL

To Complete Total

N/AMar 09

FY 2012 FY 2013

PRIOR YEARS

FY 2007

N/A

MIDS/LINK 16( OSIP 005-03 )

Field and Depot Install

N/A

243

EA-6B Series Modifications

Mar 07

Total

N/A

N/A









TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY

COST (In Millions) A 9.9 9.9

February 2007

051400, AV-8 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

DESCRIPTION: FY07 supplemental funding on this line item will provide funds for: Modification to Enhanced Position Location Reporting System software is funded so that is it compatible withthe AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod. EPLRS will enable IP communications via a radio relay system among dispersedtactial elements for the existing AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod System. This system will provide collaborationcapability between multiple platform pilots and corresponding Joint Forward Air Controllers and Tactical AirControl Party/Post personnel, allowing more accurate targeting and faster assessments in support of the GlobalWar on Terrorism (GWOT).

Fatigue Life Expended (FLE) tracking will incorporate software modifications to allow the recording of FLE onthe AV-8B concurrent with the release of the H5.0 Operational Flight Program (OFP). This requirement willallow the accurate tracking of FLE to facilitate the transition from flight hour tracking with a 6,000 hourlimit, to 100% FLE. This effort will enable safe operation of the aircraft well beyond 6,000 flight hoursbased on fatigue limiting event tracking. The impact of high utilization rates will be reduced in combatoperationssupporting the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) that drive the flying of the aircraft beyond Weapons SystemsPlanning Document estimates.

The AV-8B active inventory (21 June 2005) consists of 4 major configurations: 17 two-seat TAV-8B aircraft, 5 DAY Attack aircraft, 38 NIGHT Attack Aircraft, and 92 Night Attack/RADAR aircraft. Retrofit quantities of each ECP depend on the aircraft configuration type if & when the change was introducedinto production.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 23.6 33.9 9.9 67.4



P-1 Shopping List Item No. 26Page 1 of 4 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

(Exhibit P-40)




February 2007

051400, AV-8 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

023-00 AV-8B LITENING POD 9.5 9.5

006-06 OBSOLESCENCE REPLACEMENT 0.4 0.4

TOTAL 9.9 9.9

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 TOTALFY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013TO

COMPLETEFY 2006OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2007

Reason funds are required:Modification to Enhanced Position Location Reporting System software is funded so that it is compatible withthe AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod. EPLRS will enable IP communications via a radio relay system among dispersedtactial elements for the existing AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod System. This system will provide collaborationcapability between multiple platform pilots and corresponding Joint Forward Air Controllers and Tactical AirControl Party/Post personnel, allowing more accurate targeting and faster assessments in support of the GlobalWar on Terrorism (GWOT).

Fatigue Life Expended (FLE) tracking will incorporate software modifications to allow the recording of FLE onthe AV-8B concurrent with the release of the H5.0 Operational Flight Program (OFP). This requirement willallow the accurate tracking of FLE to facilitate the transition from flight hour tracking with a 6,000 hourlimit, to 100% FLE. This effort will enable safe operation of the aircraft well beyond 6,000 flight hoursbased on fatigue limiting event tracking. The impact of high utilization rates will be reduced in combatoperations supporting the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) that drive the flying of the aircraft beyond Weapons SystemsPlanning Document estimates.




(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:


DEVELOPMENT STATUS/MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES:



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

Litening PD/ROVER

Night

POD RETROFIT KITS

Radar

Reman

Station 4 Pods


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

CFE PODS

MULTI STATION


ECO 3.0 3.0

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS



INSTALLATION COST

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 9.5 9.5


FY 2013 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

AV-8B LITENING POD( OSIP 023-00 )

UpgradeAV-8B Night Attack & Radar/Night Attack

PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: The system will integrate and procure an external targeting pod that includes an infared (IR) and low-light TV targeting device capable of detecting, classifying, auto-tracking, and designatingair-to-surface targets. The system will support first-pass autonomous delivery of conventional, precision guided, and accurate munitions to include Laser Maverick, GBU-12 and GBU-16 and JDAM (Joint DirectAttack Munition). The system will provide targeting capabilites for the AV-8B fleet of Night Attack and Radar/Night Attack aircraft through the end of its service life. The addition of the LITENING IITargeting Pod gives the AV-8B (Night and Radar) the capability to perform precision targeting. Congressional adds of FY01 $80M, FY02 $24.7M, FY03 $28.0M and FY04 $37.0M to procure additional pods. FY07 Supplemental funds modification to Enhanced Position Location Reporting System software so that is it compatible with the AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod. EPLRS will enable IP communications via a radiorelay system among dispersed tactial elements for the existing AV-8B Litening Targeting Pod System. This system will provide collaboration capability between multiple platform pilots and correspondingJoint Forward Air Controllers and Tactical Air Control Party/Post personnel, allowing more accurate targeting and faster assessments in support of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). Fielding thiscapability will enable United States Marine Corps ground Command and Control (C2) elements to communicate with one another. Impact if funds are not provided is that without enabling EPLRS connectivity tothe Dismounted Data Automated Communications Terminal (D-DACT) directly, these systems will only be able to communicate with each other via Single Channel Ground to Air Radio System (SINCGARS) over a rangeof 3 NM or less,and D-DACT position location information (PLI) will not be visible in the Marine Air Group Task Force (MAGTF) C2 network.




(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

ECP TBD Bullet Fairing

ECP-282 Fuel Coupling

ECP-283 Water Tank Pre-Filter

ECP-305 Throttle Stick and Grip

ECP-CP-042 Ctr Tank Mod

ECP-CP-043 Heatshields

ECP-TBD Aft Structural Mod

ECP-TBD Internozzle Fairing

ECP-TBD Nozzle Ring (Frame 16)

ECP-TBD PMI/EMU

ECP-TBD V-Fin Antenna

ECP-TBD Wedge Frame


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

30KVA Generators

ECP-TBD Display Computer Kits

ECP-TBD EAAS


ECO 0.4 0.4

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST



Totals may not add due to rounding.

OBSOLESCENCE REPLACEMENT( OSIP 006-06 )

SafetyTAV-8B, AV-8B Day, AV-8B Night, AV-8B Night/Radar

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2013 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2012

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: This OSIP provides for maintaining the readiness of the AV-8B weapons system until its projected end of service, which is now expected to extend to 2025 or until replaced by STOVL JSF. FY07 supplementalprovides funding for Fatigue Life Expended (FLE). FLE Tracking will incorporate software modifications to allow the recording of Fatigue Life Expended on the AV-8B concurrent with the release of the H5.0Operational Flight Program (OFP). This requirement will allow the accurate tracking of FLE to facilitate the transition from flight hour tracking with a 6,000 hour limit, to 100% FLE. This effort willenable safe operation of the aircraft well beyond 6000 flight hours based on fatigue limiting event tracking. The impact of high utilization rates will be reduced in combat operations supporting the GlobalWar on Terrorism (GWOT), that drive the flying of the aircraft beyond Weapons Systems Planning Document estimates. The impact if funding is not received is that if transition from flight hour tracking to100% FLE is not achieved, aircraft accumulating increased hours, due to GWOT participation, will begin approaching the 6,000 hour limit, which will result in grounding aircraft sooner than anticipated whenWSPD estimates were made. This will impact future inventory of the AV-8s available for combat operations.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: FLE effort will commence, funded by FY07 supplemental funding, in FY07.




(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-40, BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION DATE:February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREAircraft Procurement, Navy/APN-5 Aircraft Modifications 052500Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior ID ToYears Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

QUANTITYCOST(In Millions) 96.8 96.8

F-18 Series Modification

(TOA, $ in Millions)

This line item funds modifications to F/A-18 aircraft that contribute to GWOT contingency operations as follows:

JHMCS: The Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) is a multi-service system that provides United States Air Force (USAF), United States Navy (USN), and United States Marine Corps (USMC) aircraft the capability to cue and verify on-board weapons and weapons sensors to a specific azimuth/elevation determined by the pilot's head position and to confirm sensor line-of-sight. The JHMCS is a critical enabler in providing aircrew enhanced situational awareness outside of the cockpit in addition to improving theaircrew's ability to slew, align and correlate numerous aircraft and weapon sensors. The current JHMCS does not provide night vision light amplification similar to Night Vision Devices (NVDs) precluding effective night mission execution. Current fleet operations are conducted during all timeframes including night operations precluding effective use of JHMCS. Aircrew are currently flying the day only JHMCS at night and holding Night Vision Devices (NVD) by hand against the JHMCS for brief periods of situational awareness. This supplemental funding will provide JHMCS the ability to cue sensors rapidly which is inherent in mission effectiveness and greatly needed for supporting the troops on the ground at night.

Impact if JHMCS funding is not received: Aircrew are currently flying the “day only” JHMCS at night and holding Night Vision Devices (NVD) by hand against the JHMCS for brief periods of situational awareness. The ability to cue sensors rapidly is required for mission effectiveness and greatly needed for supporting the troops on the ground at night. The current work around is putting aircrew and their aircraft at risk of mishap.

ATFLIR:The Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) (ORD# 605-78-02) will provide the F/A-18A+/C/D/E/F with a significantly enhanced capability to detect, track and attack air and ground targets. This supplemental funding request is for upgrades to the ATFLIR to provide a Datalink capability and Infrared Marker to support current Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) operations.

Impact if Streaming Video funding is not received: ECPs planned as part of the PB06 program of record that were deferred to fund the Rapid Deployment capability data link will not be accomplished. These ECPs were to be incorporated to address ATFLIR problems reported by fleet operators, as well as to improve reliability.

Impact if IR Marker funding is not received: This capability is a high priority fleet requirement to assist the war fighter in support of OIF/OEF. Lack of the requested funding would delay the deployment of IR Marker capability to the fleet and increase the unit price.

Impact if Datalink funding is not received: Without Data Link capability in all ATFLIR pods, Commander, Naval Air Force (CNAF) will be challenged to support CENTCOM FAC requirements for FLIR video data link operations.

Solid State Recorder:F/A-18 E/F Cockpit Video Recording System (CVRS) has been failing prematurely during combat operations. These systems record critical operational mission data and bomb hit assessments that provide combatant commanders critical information to manage the battle. A replacement Solid State Recorder (SSR) has been developed to address poor CVRS reliability and to provide critical real-time image transfer capability supporting the Global War on Terror (GWOT).

Impact if SSR funding is not received: F/A-18 aircraft are currently supporting troops on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan with Close Air Support. The nature of this conflict requires absolute certainty before delivering ordinance. Time required to communicate real-time targeting data to aircrew from the Forward Air Controller (FAC) has resulted in mission aborts, and increased friendly casualties. The ability to transfer targeting images to the FAC greatly reduces the time to kill targets, saving lives of friendly forces engaged in combat.

Litening AT:Litening AT provides 3rd Generation Targeting Pods and support to USMC Expeditionary F/A-18 deployments to OIF. OIF USMC Expeditionary F/A-18 operations are being supported with LITENING Pods redistributed from the AV-8B community, resulting in trainingpod shortfalls. This procurement is part of the continued effort to address the targeting pod shortfalls while the long term solution is addressed in the standard budget cycle.

Impact if Litening AT 3rd Generation Targeting Pods funding is not received: USMC warfighting capability will be significantly degraded by a lack of third-generation targeting pods on F/A-18 aircraft, continued re-allocation of AV-8B pods and resultant fatigue issues.

DD Form 2454, JUN 86P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 28

PAGE NO. 1 OF 9 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit P-40, BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (Continuation Page)

FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 424.7 96.8 521.5

OSIP No. Description Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total

024-00 JHMCS 3.4 3.4012-01 ATFLIR 35.5 37.4023-04 Core Avionics Upgrade 2.3 2.3024-04 Litening 47.8 47.8002-07 AESA 5.7 4.8013-07 SHARP 2.1 2.1

TOTAL 96.8 97.7

LITENING Station 4 Integration: Station 4 integration for expeditionary F/A-18's will allow F/A-18D's to carry more fuel (time on station) or weapons while employing Litening. More importantly, station 4 integration will allow all T/M/S expeditionary F/A-18's the capability to employ Litening. Giving F/A-18A+/C's the opportunity to carry Litening expands the pool of available units to deploy to theater and relieves pressure on already strained F/A-18D's which are flying 2-3 times the planned rate. This requirement will allow 3rd Generation Targeting Pods that are used to deliver precision guided ordnance, provide intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and direct troop and convoy movements on the ground to be carried on all expeditionary F/A-18's, not just F/A-18D's. This capability nearly doubles the number of available squadrons to support OIF rotations.

Impact if Litening Station 4 funding is not received : USMC warfighting capability will be significantly degraded by a lack of third-generation targeting pods on F/A-18 aircraft, continued re-allocation of AV-8B pods and resultant fatigue issues. If funded this requirement will allow 3rd Generation Targeting Pods that are used to deliver precision guided ordnance, provide intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and direct troop and convoy movements on the ground to be carried on all expeditionary F/A-18's, not just F/A-18D's. This capability nearly doubles the number of available squadrons to support OIF rotations.

SHARP:The SHAred Reconnaissance Pod (AN/ASD-12(V) SHARP) system includes: medium and high altitude Electro-Optical and Infrared (EO/IR) sensors with a growth path to Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), a data storage system, a SHARP Reconnaissance Management System (SRMS), a data link system, and a pod structure with all necessary electronics and cabling. The SHARP system provides support to precision strike by obtaining imagery for target identification, determining target coordinates and enemy order of battle, bomb impact assessment, and bomb damage assessment. The SHARP system supports Battle Group and Expeditionary operations by providing the following: maritime surveillance, surveillance of specified areas and lines of communication, target monitoring, and indications and warnings of enemy activity. The SHARP system also supports combat search and rescue by providing near real time imagery to the rescue forces.

Impact if SHARP funding is not received: If not funded, our ground forces would continue to be subjected to numerous attacks that could have been avoided or anticipated if this capability had been made available. Numerous casualties could be avoided if provided these imagery products. The ability to locate, surprise, engage, and defeat nearby hostile forces is reduced without this funding.

APG-73:Expand 4/5 on APG-73 radars allows for very high resolution radar maps that provide long range, all weather, target recognition, and precise target coordinate generation needed for precision weapons employment. This effort would finish the test flights and final engineering and provide hardware for 34 USMC Radar Upgrade (RUG) jets. Eventually, this capability could be applied to the remaining 134 Legacy APG-73 F/A-18's and 137 F/A-18E/F's with APG-73. In order for F/A-18's equipped with APG-73 radars to employ GPS guided precision weapons, precise coordinates are generated by an Electro-optical, Infrared Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) that requires clear air or coordinates are provided by a Forward Air Controller (FAC). Expand 4/5 enables the capability to self-generate coordinates in the F/A-18 regardless of the obscurations (smoke/weather) and enables longer range detection and identification of targets improving positive identification, increasing standoff, and enabling cueing for ATP's at earlier ranges.

Impact if APG-73 funding is not received: Inability of APG-73 equipped F/A-18's to employ precision guided munitions by self-generated coordinates regardless of weather and obscurations. Fire support for Marines suffers in volume and accuracy.

DD Form 2454, JUN 86P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 28

PAGE NO. 2 OF 9 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Exhibit P-3a INDIVIDUAL MODIFICATION

MODIFICATION TITLE: F/A-18 JOINT HELMET-MOUNTED CUEING SYSTEM (JHMCS) (OSIP 24-00)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18C/D/E/F TYPE MODIFICATION: CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTDESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:


FINANCIAL PLAN (TOA, $ in Millions):TOTAL

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&EPROCUREMENT Installation Kits C/D E/F Canopy A Kits (AYC-1321) Ejection Seat A Kits (ACC-695) Installation Kits N/R Installation Equipment 48 2.4 48 2.4 C/D E/F Installation Equipment N/R Engineering Change Orders Data Training Support Equipment 0.2 0.2 ILS 0.8 0.8 SparesOther Support - Testing Installation Cost

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 3.4 3.4Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding2. Asterisk indicates amount less than $50K

FY 2008 To CompleteFY2010FY 2009 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013Prior Years FY 2007FY 2006

The JHMCS is a critical enabler in providing aircrew enhanced situational awareness outside of the cockpit in addition to improving the aircrew's ability to slew, align, and correlate numerous aircraft and weapon sensors. The current JHMCS does not provide night vision light amplification similar to Night Vision Devices (NVDs), precluding effective night mission execution. Current fleet operations include night operations, precluding effective use of JHMCS. Aircrew in Operation Iraqi Freedom are currently flying the "day only" JHMCS at night and holding NVDs by hand againsthe JHMCS for brief periods of situational awareness. This current work around is putting aircrew and their aircraft at risk of mishap.

This supplemental funding request will provide JHMCS "at night" ability to cue sensors rapidly, which is required for mission effectiveness and greatly needed for supporting the troops on the ground at night.

F/A-18E/F JHMCS completed Developmental Testing in August 2001. Operational Test (OPEVAL) was completed in April 2002. F/A-18E/F retrofit kit procurement began in FY 2004 and installed in FY 2005 starting with Lot 23 aircraft. JHMCS procurement for F/A-18C/D was approved at a milestone decision in January 2004. AFT Seat development completes in FY06 and is incorporated in production F/A-18E/F aircraft beginning with Lot 30. The first F/A-18C/D JHMCS retrofit kits were procured in FY 2005 and installed in FY 2006.

$1.5M of RDT&E is also being requested as part of this Supplemental Budget (PE 0204136N, Project 1662) for completion of qualification testing of the "at night" capability.

P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 28PAGE NO. 3 OF 9 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED



MODIFICATION TITLE: ADVANCED TARGETING FORWARD LOOKING INFRARED (ATFLIR) (OSIP 12-01)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18A+/C/D/E/F TYPE MODIFICATION: CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTSDESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:



Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&E PROCUREMENT Installation Kits Installation Kits N/R Installation Equipment(C/D) Installation Equipment(E/F) Installation Equipment N/R 5.1 5.1 Engineering Change Orders IR Marker 45 3.7 45 3.7 Datalink 88 14.3 88 14.3 EO Camera 1.8 Data 0.4 0.4 Training 0.6 0.6 Support Equipment 1.2 1.2 ILS 8.9 8.9 SparesOther Support 1.4 1.4 Installation Cost TOTAL PROCUREMENT 35.5 37.4Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding

FY2011FY2010 To CompleteFY2012 FY2013Prior Years FY 2009FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

The ATFLIR provides the F/A-18A+/C/D/E/F with a significantly enhanced capability to detect, track and attack air and ground targets. Laser guided and Global Positioning System (GPS) standoff weapon systems and higher altitude attack profiles require improved performance over the AAS-38/46 Targeting FLIR. The ATFLIR is designed to provide a quantum leap in operational effectiveness to fully support the standoff precision strike mission. Improved reliability and maintainability technology will increase operational availability while reducing life cycle costs.

Supplemental funds requested in this OSIP are for several modifications to the ATFLIR pod to improve Navy F/A-18 aircraft mission capability in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) to include: an Infrared (IR) Marker; a Pod Datalink capability; and ECPs that were included in the PB06 Program of Record that were deferred to provide the warfighter with a Rapid Deployment Streaming Video capability.

Rapid Deployment DataLink -- Streaming Video ($6.500M): Supplemental funds are requested to incorporate several Engineering Changes that were deferred from the PB06 program of record to rapidly field a critical data link capability. Aircraft arriving in theatre without video downlink capability are being turned away from 80% of the Forward Air Controller missions. Video downlink capability has become a critical operational requirement for all aircraft deployed to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). In support of deployed force commanders, a rapid deployment video downlink was funded and fielded by deferring ATFLIR Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) planned as part of the PB06 submission. The deferred ECPs were planned to improve reliability and fix problems reported by fleet operators.

IR Marker ($7.920M): Supplemental funds are requested to incorporate an IR Marker into 45 ATFLIR pods, along with funding for the associated support requirements. The IR Marker allows Night Vision Device-equipped Forward Air Controllers to pinpoint and confirm targets for the aircrew to employ weapons in support of Close Air Support, force protection, and Imaging, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions in OIF.

Datalink ($21.120M): Supplemental funds are requested to incorporate a data link into 88 ATFLIR pods, along with funding for the associated support requirements. Adding this capability will support the CENTCOM requirements for FLIR video datalink requirements to Rover III terminals to support Forward Air Controllers' target identification during Close Air Support (CAS), force protection, and ISR missions in OIF.

The Rapid Deployment Datalink has been fielded in support of OIF operations. The Engineering Change to incorporate IR Marker has been fully qualified and is ready to be included in production and retrofit contracts. Final qualification testing of the ATFLIR pod datalink ECP is scheduled to complete by the end of FY06 and Joint Interoperability testing will be completed in early FY07.




MODIFICATION TITLE: CORE AVIONICS IMPROVEMENTS / UPGRADES (OSIP 023-04)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18A-F TYPE MODIFICATION: Capability and Reliability Improvements

DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:


FINANCIAL PLAN (TOA, $ in Millions):Prior Years FY 2006 TOTAL

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&EPROCUREMENTINSTALLATION KITS "A" Kits Solid State Recorder 24 2.3 24 2.3INSTALLATION KITS N/R Solid State Recorder DIFRSINSTALLATION EQUIP. MP/UPC "B" Kits Solid State RecorderINSTALLATION EQUIP. N/RENGINEERING CHANGE ORDERSDATATRAINING EQUIPMENTSUPPORT EQUIPMENTILSOTHER SUPPORTINTERIM CONTRACT SUPPORT Installation Cost TOTAL PROCUREMENT 24 2.3 24 2.3Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding 2. Asterisk indicates amount less than $50K

FY 2012 To CompleteFY 2013FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

F/A-18 Cockpit Video Recording System (CVRS) has been failing prematurely during combat operations. These systems record critical operational mission data and bomb hit assessments that provide combatant commanders critical information to manage the battle. A replacement Solid State Recorder (SSR) has been developed to address poor CVRS reliability and providing critical real-time image transfer capability supporting the Global War on Terror (GWOT).

Supplemental funding is requested to retrofit two squadrons of F/A-18 aircraft with SSRs.

A Mission Planning system supporting F/A-18A-F is currently fielded. A Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS) was developed and fielded for F/A-18A-F in the first quarter fiscal year 2005 with 19C and H2E+. The Solid State Recorder retrofit was approved as a Congressional new start in August 2004. Validation/Verification for the SSR was completed in the second and third quarter fiscal year March 2005, with retrofit on two squadrons completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.




MODIFICATION TITLE: Litening AT Targeting Pod (OSIP 024-04)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18A+/C/D TYPE MODIFICATION: CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTS




Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&EPROCUREMENT Installation Kits A-Kit (D's) A-Kit (A+'s) AvionicsInstallation Kits N/R Installation Equipment(C/D) 22 36.7 22 36.7 Installation Equipment N/R Engineering Change Orders 8.1 8.1 Data 0.2 0.2 Training Support Equipment ILS SparesOther Support - Testing 2.9 2.9 Installation CostTotal Procurement 47.8 47.8

Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding

To CompleteFY 2013FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

Litening AT provides 3rd Generation Targeting Pods and support to USMC Expeditionary F/A-18 deployments to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). OIF USMC Expeditionary F/A-18 operations are being supported with LITENING Pods redistributed from the AV-8B community, resulting in training pod shortfalls. Currently, the F/A-18 Program Office has twenty-four (30) LITENING Pods on contract. This procurement is part of the continued relief effort for the targeting pod shortfalls while the long term solution is addressed in the standard budget cycle.

Station 4 integration for expeditionary F/A-18's will allow F/A-18D's to carry more fuel (time on station) or weapons while employing Litening. More importantly, station 4 integration will allow all T/M/S expeditionary F/A-18's the capability to employ Litening. Giving F/A-18A+/C's the opportunity to carry Litening expands the pool of available units to deploy to theater and relieves pressure on already strained F/A-18D's which are flying 2-3 times the planned rate. This requirement will allow 3rd Generation Targeting Pods that are used to deliver precision guided ordnance, provide intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and direct troop and convoy movements on the ground to be carried on all expeditionary F/A-18's, not just F/A-18D's. This capability nearly doubles the number of available squadrons to support OIF rotations.

Congressional New Start Notification letters dated 24 July 2003 identified the need for limited integration of the LITENING Enhanced Range Forward Looking Infra Red on the F/A-18D. This interim enhanced capability provided USMC Air Ground Task Forces greateprecision close-in-air support capability and overall mission flexibility in the execution of theater operations in the combat environment. For F/A-18A+, another set of Congressional New Start Notification letters was submitted 29 October 2004 for integration of the Litening Forward Looking Infrared pods on land-based F/A-18A-Cs to increase their effectiveness in the Global War on Terrorism. FY05 Congressional Add of $3.0M was added. $2.8M of FY06 F/A-18 ATARS funding was realigned for LITENING Station four integration on F/A-18A+/Ds. FY-06 Congressional Add of $30.5M was added to fully fund the acquisition, integration, install ation, and logistics for the the remainder of the Litening pod AT requirement.




MODIFICATION TITLE: AESA/AN-APG-65/AN/APG-73 (OSIP 002-07)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18 A/B/C/D/E/F TYPE MODIFICATION: AVIONICS UPGRADE



FINANCIAL PLAN (TOA, $ in Millions):

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&EPROCUREMENT Installation Kits A KIT 1 - Radar Set A KIT 2 - Radome A Kit 3 - Expand 4/5 5.7 5.7 Installation Kits N/R Installation Equipment B Kit -1 Main Electrical Panel Electrical Connections Liquid Cooling system Quick Disconnects ECS Fixed Duct Fiber Channel Network Switches (FCNS) B Kit -2 Main Electrical Panel Electrical Connections Liquid Cooling system Quick Disconnects ECS Fixed Duct Installation Equipment N/R Engineering Change Orders Data Training Support Equipment ILS Other Support Interim Contractor Support Installation Cost TOTAL PROCUREMENT 5.7 5.7Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding

FY 2011 FY 2012 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2013FY 2010Prior Years FY 2009 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

The F/A-18 E/F program has developed and integrated the AN/APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) RADAR system for installation in Lot 26 and subsequent Block II, Super Hornet aircraft. The integration of the AN/APG-79 AESA RADAR system into the F/A-18 E/F greatly improves the weapon system's threat detection range, high resolution Synthetic Aperture RADAR (SAR) ground mapping capability, survivability and reliability.

Expand 4/5 on APG-73 radars allows for very high resolution radar maps that provide long range, all weather, target recognition, and precise target coordinate generation needed for precision weapons employment. This effort would finish the test flights and final engineering and provide hardware for 34 USMC Radar Upgrade (RUG) jets. Eventually, this capability could be applied to the remianing 134 Legacy APG-73 F/A-18's and 137 F/A-18E/F's with APG-73. In order for F/A-18's equipped with APG-73 radars to employ GPS guided precision weapons, precise coordinates are generated by an Electro-optical, Infrared Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) that requires clear air or coordinates arprovided by a Forward Air Controller (FAC). Expand 4/5 enables the capability to self-generate coordinates in the F/A-18 regardless of the obscurations (smoke/weather) and enables longer range detection and identification of targets improving positive identification, increasing standoff, and enabling cueing for ATP's at earlier ranges.

Forward fit of the AN/APG-79 AESA RADAR system began with limited quantities in Lot 27 through Lot 29 F/A-18 E/F aircraft. All Lot 30 and subsequent F/A-18 E/F and EA-18G aircraft will be forward fit with the AN/APG-79 AESA RADAR. This OSIP reflects the retrofit of Lot 26 through Lot 29 F/A-18 E/F aircraft.

The procurement of retrofit kits will begin in FY08 with retrofit kit installation beginning in FY2010. Installation of kits will be accomplished by a Fleet Support Team traveling to two locations (NAS Oceana and NAS Lemoore) and executing the retrofit or aircraft by squadron.




MODIFICATION TITLE: AN/ASD-12(V) SHARP (OSIP 013-07)

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: F/A-18E/F TYPE MODIFICATION: CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTSDESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:



Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $RDT&EPROCUREMENT Installation Kits 21 0.4 21 0.4 Installation Kits N/R 0.8 0.8 Installation Equipment Installation Equipment(E/F) Installation Equipment N/R Engineering Change Orders Data Training Support Equipment ILS 0.8 0.8 Spares Other Support - Testing Installation Cost 0.1 14 7 21 0.1Total Procurement 2.1 2.1

Notes:1. Totals may not add due to rounding2. Asterisk indicates amount less than $50K

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 To CompleteFY 2013FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

The SHAred Reconnaissance Pod (AN/ASD-12(V) SHARP) system includes: medium and high altitude Electro-Optical and Infrared (EO/IR) sensors with a growth path to Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), a data storage system, a SHARP Reconnaissance Management System (SRMS), a data link system, and a pod structure with all necessary electronics and cabling. The SHARP system provides support to precision strike by obtaining imagery for target identification, determining target coordinates and enemy order of battle, bomb impact assessment, and bomb damage assessment. The SHARP system supports Battle Group and Expeditionary operations by providing the following: maritime surveillance, surveillance of specified areas and lines of communication, target monitoring, and indications and warnings of enemy activity. The SHARP system supports combat search and rescue by providing near real time imagery to the rescue forces. It also provides the warfighter on the ground with immediate situational awareness of a broad area surrounding his position, facilitating defensive and offensive tactics against terrorists and insurgents. In addition, SHARP has the capability to support identification and location of road side Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). SHARP Imagery products are digital still frame images providing significantly higher resolution than video imagery. In addition latitude, longitude and other pertinent metadata accompanies each image frame. Access to these imagery products will enhance the ability of the warfighter to engage/avoid/defeat nearby enemy forces and would provide a clear tactical advantage in any situation.

This supplemental request includes procurement, nonrecurring, installation costs, and associated ILS to modify 21 AN/ASD-12(V) SHAred Reconnaissance Pods (SHARP) and associated Weapons Replaceable/Replacement Assemblies (WRAs) to allow SHARP mounted on an F/A-18 to immediately data link high resolution Visible and Infrared imagery via the existing ROVER TCDL data link. SHARP currently includes a datalink capability which has already been fielded. The Non-Recurring cost will be to modify the datalink to communicate with Rover III.



Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: F/A-18E/F MODIFICATION TITLE: AN/ASD-12(V) SHARP (OSIP 013-07)


METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION: FIELD MOD TEAM

ADMINISTRATIVE LEADTIME: 12 Months PRODUCTION LEADTIME: 7 Months

CONTRACT DATES: FY 2006: FY 2007: Sep-07 FY 2008: FY 2009:

DELIVERY DATE: FY 2006: FY 2007: Apr-08 FY 2008: FY 2009:

Cost: Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete TOTALQty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

FY 2005 & PY () kits FY 2006 ( ) kits FY 2007 ( 21 ) kits 0.1 14 7 21 0.1 FY 2008 ( ) kits FY 2009 ( ) kits FY 2010 ( ) kits FY 2011 ( ) kits FY 2012 ( ) kits FY 2013 ( ) kits To Complete ( ) kits TOTAL 0.1 14 7 21 0.1

Installation ScheduleFY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

& Prior 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0

FY 2010 To1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Complete TOTAL

In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21Notes: 1. Requested FY07 Supplemental funds will be used to install modifications beginning in FY08.2. Contract award date assumes funds will be received in April 2007.

($ in Millions)FY 2010

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013






TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


025-97 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT 27.0 27.0

018-07 CH-46 SUSTAINMENT 1.8 1.8

TOTAL 28.8 28.8

TOTALFY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013TO

COMPLETEFY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2006

February 2007

052600, H-46 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

Narrative Description THIS LINE ITEM FUNDS MODIFICATIONS TO THE H-46 AIRCRAFT. THE H-46 IS A TWIN-TURBINE POWERED DUAL-PILOTED TANDEM-ROTOR HELICOPTER. THE CABIN CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR ACCOMODATING 25 TROOPS AND CREW MEMBERS. THE CABIN ALSO CONTAINS AN INTEGRAL CARGO AND RESCUE SYSTEM. THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE MODIFICATION BUDGET IN FY2008 IS TO KEEP THE H-46 A VIABLE PLATFORM UNTIL A REPLACEMENT AIRCRAFT CAN BE FIELDED. H-46 HELICOPTERS ARE USED BY THE MARINE CORPS FOR TROOP TRANSPORT AND SEARCH AND RESCUE MISSIONS. USMC INVENTORY: (220) CH46E + (3) HH-46D. (24) OF THE (220) CH-46E'S ARE RESERVE AIRCRAFT. ORIGINAL DESIGN SERVICE LIFE WAS 10,000 HOURS. IT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 12,500 HOURS ON 18 DEC 1992 AND TO 15,000 HOURS ON 16 FEB 1996. AIRCRAFT WILL CONTINUE TO BE FLOWN PAST 15,000 FLIGHT HOURS ON AN AGE EXPLORATION PROGRAM.


47,401 18,468 28,805 94,674

Reason funds are required:

ALE-47 Increased Expendable PODS -- OIF threat requires additional expendables. Funds would e used to procure and install two additional ALE-47 PODS per aircraft.

Force Battle Command Birigade & Below Blue Force Tracking -- This funding will install provisions for Blue Force Tracker with moving map in 154 core CH-46E aircraft and buy 61 mission kits. The 61 mission kits would be installed and used on those squadrons forward deployed, along with enough assets to outfit one CH-46E MEU squadron, and some mission kits in CONUS for training and to support exercises. This BFT system is more effective and reliable than the old MTX-BFT and will be common with the US Army and with the CHF-53E, which reduces the logistic tail for supporting this system.

CH-46 CDNU -- The current CDNU-800 used in the CH-46E lacks the processing power (386 MHz) or the memory (1 MB) to allow the CH-46E to incorporate avionics systems needed to allow for operations in forward operating areas. Fleet impact is that the Common Blue Force Tracking System cannot be integrated into the aircraft. A more operator intensive non integrate BFT system will be installed. Also, current speech security system (KY-58) is outdated, less effective and more prone to operator error than the newer embedded systems. The CH-46E community is actively seeking ways to reduce the empty weight of the helicopter in order to increase combat payload. The current speech security equipment weighs approximately 80 pounds. The current versions of the ARC-210 common radio have embedded speech security, allowing for a significant reduction in weight/ increase in payload. The newer versions of transponder (APX-118/123) are needed to replace the current version of the APX-72 currently used. The BFT, newer versions of transponders, and the newer versions of the ARC-210 cannot be installed in the CH-46E because the current CDNU-800 does not have the additional memory or processing power to control or integrate these systems. Failing to fund this issue will result in continued ooperation with the outdated, operator intensive, and less effective mission avionics equipment. In some cases, the lack of an updated CDNU will result in degraded mission effectiveness and increased hazards to the aircraft and aircrew due to lack of operational friendly and enemy situational awareness (BFT).





CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

ALE-47 FWD POD A KIT 115 4.6 115 4.6


INSTALL EQUIPMENTINTEGRATED CDNU KIT 154 14.8 154 14.8


ECO

DATA 0.3 0.3

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.1 0.1



INSTALLATION COST 30 5.7 167 72 269 5.7

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 299 27.0 167 72 538 27.0



SAFETY (HONA Category A)H-46 SERIES


SAFETY IMPROVEMENT( OSIP 025-97 )

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:



CH-46E ALE-47 INCREASED EXPENDABLE PODs - The ground to air threat for helicopters deployed in support of OIF is evolving to the point that combat operations in high threat areas will require additional upgraded expendables to reduce the surface to air missile threat. The threat requires an ability to carry additional expendables and to dispense them more effectively. ECP will be developed for a second set ALE-47 expendable pod under the nose of the aircraft. Funding is included to perform structural testing for the new Pod mount locations, EMI testing, safe separation testing, and effectiveness testing on the new PODs distribution of expendables. A kits will be qualified and installed in 154 aircraft.

CH-46E FBCB2 (FORCE BATTLE COMMAND BRIGADE& BELOW) BLUE FORCE TRACKER - The US Army AVIATION FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND BRIGADE & BELOW (FBCB2)/BLUE FORCE TRACKING (BFT) SYSTEM is the common BFT system being installed in CH-53E and CH-46E helicopters. This program provides for an integrated installation by developing a more appropriate mounting location, improving the cable routing for the cockpit displays and by allowing for the use of the on board GPS. This integration will allow the cockpit crew more control of the system, improve the safety aspect by removing loose cables from BFT mission kit to cockpit EDMs, reduce operational weight, improve readiness/availability of the BFT, and increase available space for payload by removing the BFT mission pallet from the cargo area of the aircraft. The BFT will be installed in 154 aircraft.


CH-46E ALE-47 INCREASED EXPENDABLE PODs - The program will start upon receipt of funds.

CH-46E FBCB2 (FORCE BATTLE COMMAND BRIGADE& BELOW) BLUE FORCE TRACKER - The FY06 GWOT funding purchased a non integrated "A" kit installation in 154 aircraft and 61 "P" kits ( mission kits) . NRE underway. Kit procurement planned for March 2007.

INSTALLATION IS FULLY FUNDED WITH THE REQUESTED FUNDING. INSTALLS WILL COMPLETE IN FY 09 ONCE ALL KITS DELIVER.

Totals may not add due to roundingP-1 Shopping List Item No 29

Page 2 of 6CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: MODIFICATION TITLE: SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM(ALE-47 FWD POD A KIT) (025-97)




CONTRACT DATES: FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

DELIVERY DATE: FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

($ in Millions)

Cost: PRIOR YEARS FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 TO COMPLETE


PRIOR YEARS () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (115) kits 20 2.0 95 115 2.0

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits

TO COMPLETE20 2.0 95 115 2.0


Installation Scheis based on the assumption FY07 supplemental funding is received 01 June 2007.

FY2006 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 20 30 33 32

Out 20 30 33 32

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 115

Out 115

FY2012 FY2013

To Complete

Sep 07

H-46 SERIES

CONTRACTOR FMT

1 3

Total

TOTAL

Total

PRIOR YEARS

FY2007

Jun 07



(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: MODIFICATION TITLE: SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM(BFT INTG CDNU KIT) (025-97)




CONTRACT DATES: FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

DELIVERY DATE: FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

($ in Millions)

Cost: PRIOR YEARS FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 TO COMPLETE


PRIOR YEARS () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (154) kits 10 3.7 72 72 154 3.7

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits

TO COMPLETE10 3.7 72 72 154 3.7


Installation Scheis based on the assumption FY07 supplemental funding is received 01 Jun 07.

FY2006 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 10 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

Out 10 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 154

Out 154

FY2012 FY2013

To Complete Total

TOTAL

Total

PRIOR YEARS

FY2007

Sep 07

Jun 07

H-46 SERIES

CONTRACTOR FMT

1 3



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:



QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $RDT&EPROCUREMENTINSTALLATION KITS KIT #1INSTALLATION KITS N/R 2 1.6 2 1.6INSTALL EQUIPMENTINSTALL EQUIPMENT N/RECODATATRAINING EQUIP*SUPPORT EQUIPILSOTHER SUPPORTINTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORTINSTALLATION COST 0.2 2 2 .2TOTAL PROCUREMENT 2 1.8 2 4 1.8



CH-46 GERIATRIC AIRCRAFT SAFETY AND SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM ( OSIP 018-07 )

SAFETY (HONA Category A)H-46 SERIES


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: CH-46E aircraft are currently deployed in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). The expectation is this helicopter will continue to be needed for direct support forthe foreseeable future, both as squadrons deployed directly into Iraq and as supporting forces from deployed MEUs. The continued unusually high utilization rate of these assets in unforgiving environments,such as IRAQ and at sea, has reduced the overall material condition of the CH-46E fleet. The requirement to target several areas of low reliability and heavy stress/wear is necessary to continue to operatesafely and to provide helicopters ready for combat operations in direct support of OIF. This issue would fund the nonrecurring engineering (NRE) to: (1) identify and replace degraded wiring with new andupgraded wiring harnesses, (2) improve the reliability & modernize 40 year old hydraulic systems, (3) improve heavily worn airframe structure that is subject to high levels of stress, and (4) addresscritical parts obsolescence issues that are beginning to impact readiness.

The current CDNU-800 used in the CH-46E lacks the processing power (386 MHz) or the memory (1 MB) to allow the CH046E to incorporate avionics systems needed to allow for operations in forward operating areas. fleet impact is that the Common blue force Tracking system cannot be integrated into the aircraft. A more operator intensive non integrate BFT system will be installed. Also, current speech security system (KY-58) is outdated, less effective and more prone to operator error than the newer embedded systems. The Ch-46E community is actively seeking ways to reduce the empty weight of the helicopter in order to increase combat payload. The current speech security equipment weighs approximately 80 pounds. The current versions of the ARC-210 common radio have embedded speech security, allowing for a significant reduction in weight/increase in payload. The newer versions of transponder (APX-118/123) are needed to replace the current version of the APX-72 currently used. The BFT, newer versions of transponders, and the and the newer versions of the ARC-210 cannot be installed in the CH-46E because the current CDNU-800 does not have the additional memory or processing power to control or integrate these systems.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES:ECP underway.



(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: MODIFICATION TITLE: INSTALLATION INFORMATION: METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION: ADMINISTRATIVE LEADTIME: Months PRODUCTION LEADTIME: Months

CONTRACT DATES: FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 DELIVERY DATE: FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits FY 2006 () kits FY 2007 (2) kits 0.2 2 2 0.2

FY 2008 () kits FY 2009 () kits FY 2010 () kits FY 2011 () kits FY 2012 () kits FY 2013 () kits TO COMPLETE

0.2 2 2 0.2

INSTALLATION IS FULLY FUNDED WITH THE REQUESTED FUNDING. INSTALLS WILL COMPLETE IN FY08 ONCE ALL KITS DELIVER. Installation Schedule

FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 1 1

Out 1 1

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 2

Out 2

H-46 SERIES CH-46 GERIATRIC AIRCRAFT SAFETY AND SUSTAINMENT PR

CONTRACTOR CDU INSTALLS

1 2

Jun 07

Aug 07

TOTAL

Total

0 FY 2007

FY 2012 FY 2013To Complete Total



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


February 2007

052700, AH-1W SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

DESCRIPTION: AH-1W ANVIS/HUD 24 System. The day and night capabilities of the ANVIS/HUD-24 willradically improve pilot situational awareness (SA) in high mission tasking scenarios and allenvironmental conditions. The helmet-mounted sight/display will increase survivability by allowingcontinuous heads-up time during high-workload tasks such as targeting, weapons employment, andlow-visibility takeoffs and landings. The ANVIS/HUD-24 will also significantly improve the warfighting capability of the AH-1W by accelerating the target acquisition process and aircrew targethandoff capabilities. Requested funding will procure and field the LRIP quantity of 25 ANVIS-24systems to AH-1W aircraft currently supporting OIF.

The AH-1W Critical Cockpit Upgrade (CCU) integrates Blue Force Tracker (BFT) as part of anupgraded cockpit control system by replacing the Cockpit Display Navigation Unit (CDNU) andInterface Control Unit (ICU). Additionally, the APX-100 transponder will be replaced by theAPX-118. BFT integration improves interoperability with the multi-national deployed forcesfighting the GWOT and decreases the risk of friendly fire incidents. APX-118 integration permitsembedded encryption, viewing and control of IFF functions "Under Glass", and mode 5/S potential. The moving map and BFT will provide accurate and timely information on both own ship and friendlyand enemy positions. The improved cockpit control system with integrated transponder will savelives and aircraft by improving SA, reducing pilot workload, providing greater capacity forcritical safety of flight tasks (aviating, navigating, communicating) and critical operationaltasks (targeting and weapons employment). The current configuration APX-100 in the AH-1W is adocumented Hazard to Safe Operations in OIF and OEF. Requested funding will provide fielding ofCCU system in 162 AH-1Ws, 4 for test and evaluation and 158 of which are directly supporting OIFand the GWOT.

Impact if not funded: ANVIS 24- AH-1W aircrews will continue to have degraded SituationalAwareness (SA), a causal factor in at least one H-1 mishap. CCU- Interoperability with accurateinformation regarding location of forces is required in the multi-national GWOT. If not fundedAH-1W aircrews will continue to fight the GWOT with reduced SA that increases the risk ofaccidents/loss of aircraft/aircrew and friendly fire incidents. Since the beginning of GWOT theMarine Corps has lost 19 H-1 Aircraft.








February 2007

052700, AH-1W SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

013-00 AH-1W A/C & T700 ENG 42.2 42.2

TOTAL 42.2 42.2

FY 2007

Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

25.7 42.2 67.9


COMPLETEFY 2006OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2007






MODIFICATION TITLE:


*Kit installation funds will be placed on contract in FY 2007 and installations will occur as kits are received.



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

ANVIS HUD 25 5.6 25 5.6

CXP (2 per A/C) & CCP (1 per A/C) 168 0.3 168 .3

INSTALLATION KITS N/R 4 0.4 4 .4

INSTALL EQUIPMENT

ANVIS HUD 25 8.8 25 8.8

CXP(2 per A/C) & CCP (1 per A/C) 168 17.1 168 17.1


ECO 0.3 .3

DATA 0.4 .4

TRAINING EQUIP 0.3 .3

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.9 .9



INSTALLATION COST 3.2 97 96 193 3.2



QTY of 4 Installation kits N/R is 2 CXP, 2 ANVIS


AH-1W A/C & T700 ENG( OSIP 013-00 )

SAFETYAH-1W


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: AH-1W ANVIS/HUD 24 System. The day and night capabilities of the ANVIS/HUD-24 will radically improve pilot situational awareness in highmission tasking scenarios and all environmental conditions. The helmet-mounted sight/display will increase survivability by allowing continuous heads-up time duringhigh-workload tasks such as targeting, weapons employment, and low-visibility takeoffs and landings. The AH-1W Critical Cockpit Upgrade (CCU) consists of and integratesBlue Force Tracker (BFT) as part of an upgraded cockpit control (CXP) system by replacing the Cockpit Display Navigation Unit (CDNU) Cockpit Control Processor (CCP) andInterface Control Unit (ICU). Additionally, the APX-100 transponder will be replaced by the APX-118. BFT integration improves interoperability with the multi-nationaldeployed forces fighting the GWOT and decreases the risk of friendly fire incidents. APX-118 integration permits embedded encryption, viewing and control of IFF functions"Under Glass", and mode 5/S potential. The moving map and BFT will provide accurate and timely information on both own ship and friendly and enemy positions.




(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a







($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS (0) kits 0 0

FY 2006 (0) kits 0 0

FY 2007 (193) kits 3.2 97 96 193 3.2

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE 0 0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.2 0 0.0 97 0.0 96 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 193 3.2



FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 25 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

Out 25 24 24 24 24 24 24

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 193

Out 24 193

FY 2012 FY 2013

To Complete Total

TOTAL

Total

Prior Years

FY 2007

N/A Dec-08 N/A N/A

N/A Jun-07 N/A N/A

AH-1W AH-1W A/C & T700 ENG (OSIP 013-00)

CONTRACTOR FIELD MOD TEAM

9 18



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY

COST (In Millions) 46.8 46.8

FY 2007

Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

55.4 22.9 46.8 125.1

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTION FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total

007-98 INTEGRATED MECH DIAG 2.8 2.8

010-05 H-53 ERIP 8.3 8.3

015-05 H-53 MEDIVAC 18.3 18.3

008-06 H-53 A/C SUSTAINMENT 3.8 3.8

010-08 DIRCM 13.6 13.6

TOTAL 46.8 46.8

February 2007


P-40

DESCRIPTION: This line item funds modifications to the CH-53D/CH-53E/MH-53E aircraft. As of 1 Aug 2006, there are 32 MH-53E Helicopters; 150 CH-53E Helicopters; and 35 CH-53D Helicopters. The CH-53E is a seven blade main rotor and a four-blade canted tail rotor helicopter powered by three T64-GE-416A turbo shaft engines on the CH-53E while the CH-53D has six main rotor blades and two T64-GE-413 engines. The CH-53D/E aircraft are capable of both land and ship based transport of heavy equipment, supplies, and personnel. The MH-53E is similar to the CH-53E with additional capabilities for Airborne Mine Countermeasures (AMCM), Vertical On-Board Delivery (VOD), and Special Missions which require longer range and more precise navigation than that of the CH-53E.


The overall goal of this FY07 Supplemental request is to request; (007-98) IMDS: funding for NRE and test, procurement / installation of Validation & Verification MH-53E platforms, and one Maintenance Trainer. The IMDS system enhances safety and reduces life cycle costs for helicopters; (010-05) ERIP: funding to replace current uncoated airfoils on the T64-GE-419 engine with coated Titanium Nitride (TiN) Erosion Resistant Coating for compressor airfoils to overcome sand erosion and to maintain a stable Time On Wing (TOW) average for the T64-GE-419 engine providing heavy lift support of the GWOT. (015-05) MEDIVAC: MH-53E ASE Survivability - The MH-53E has been repeatedly called upon to execute support missions in OIF. In order to operate in this tactical environment, the MH-53E must been given an effective ASE suite and have a cockpit compatible with NVGs. This funding covers the procurement and installation of an IR missile warning system, updates the existing flare/chaff dispenser, provides a ramp mounted weapon for self-defense, and a night vision capable cockpit. BFT - this funding is to pay for the procurement of ninety-two (92) additional Blue Force Tracking (BFT) off-the-shelf systems for all T/M/S H-53s & associated NRE and provides a quick, fielded solution to the H-53 fleet to increase cockpit navigational situational awareness.








February 2007


P-40

This funding would be in addition to thirty-two (32) systems previously funded with FY05 and FY06 supplemental funds and would complete requirements for all deployed aircraft in support of GWOT operations; VDE – this funding will be used to conduct NRE, procure necessary prototype kits, and complete testing requirements for a Visually Degraded Environment (VDE) solution. VDE is the greatest unmitigated challenge faced by Marine Aviation in current GWOT operating environments. GWOT will continue to demand that the CH-53E operate in VDE and continue to endanger flight crews and passengers while flying in a low altitude/low airspeed regime. A VDE solution will facilitate mission accomplishment in all degraded cueing environments; prevent degraded cueing environment mishaps and subsequent loss of life and assets. (008-06) Sustainment: H-53 Sustainment was established to focus investment on age- and usage-related factors that drive the very high maintenance burden, high operation and support costs, and reduced availability across the H-53 fleet. Automated Wiring Analysis System – procurement of ESP Handheld Wiring Fault Analysis testers for both the Organization and Intermediate Maintenance Levels to test, fault isolate, and troubleshoot intermittent and deteriorated KAPTON wiring to detect and potentially avoid future failures. KAPTON wiring shorting remains a top safety issue for the CH/MH-53E aircraft. These testers will reduce the risk of future KAPTON wiring mishaps during GWOT operations; Existing AFCS computer is 1970s vintage electronics, and has been identified as a Top 10 maintenance degrader item as experienced in GWOT. This initiative would integrate a replacement digital AFCS computer based on the proven and reliable H-60 flight control computer. Arc Fault Circuit Breaker funding is provided to replace current thermal circuit breakers with arc fault detecting circuit breakers that shut off power to arcing electrical circuits before overheating, preventing the outbreak of fire. Funding is also provided to replace current H-53 generator control unit (GCU) with a common GCU that provides control and protective functions for engine-driven generators; (010-08) DIRCM: Current ASE gear employed in OIF AOR is only marginally effective against the newest generation of IR-seeking, shoulder-fired manpads. With the large number of troops that the 53E can carry making it the choice aircraft for theater commanders, the large IR signature also makes it a lucrative target to insurgents. Where the current ASE suite is only moderately effective, the Directed IR Counter Measures (DIRCM) system that is being procured is highly effective against all generations of manpads.






MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

A-Kits


INSTALL EQUIPMENT * *


ECO

DATA 0.2 0.2



ILS * *




TOTAL PROCUREMENT 2.8 2 2.8

Notes:

1. Asterisk (*) indicates amount value less than $51K

2. Totals may not add due to rounding

3. Trainer kit procured with FY07 supplemental funds will be installed in FY08.

FY 2013

H-53E Integrated Mechanical Diagnostics Systems (OSIP 007-98)

SAFETY, READINESS AND MAINTAINABILITYCH-53E (148), MH-53E (32),(CH-53E-(22) LRIP Quantity)

FY 2006PRIOR YEARS TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: IMDS is the first fully integrated health and usage monitoring system incorporated into USN/USMC helicopters. It continuously monitors the condition of dynamic components in helicopter drive trains and rotor systems. The system enhances safety and reduces life cycle costs for helicopters. Its functions include rotor track and balance, mechanical diagnostics for shafts, gearboxes and bearings, enIMDS is the first fully integrated health and usage monitoring system incorporated into USN/USMC helicopters. It continuously monitors the condition of dynamic components in helicopter drive trains and rotor systems. The system enhances safety and reduces life cycle costs for helicopters. Its functions include rotor track and balance, mechanical diagnostics for shafts, gearboxes and bearings, engine power assurance, NATOPS exceedance identification, and interface to the NALCOMIS maintenance management information system. Its airborne system continuously monitors aircraft performance and vibration parameters in flight and records that data on a removable memory unit. A separate ground-based system analyzes the data recorded in flight to identify health indicators and trends, from which maintenance advisories are generated. These funds will initiate NRE for the MH-53E platform to integrate IMDS capability.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: The CH-53E IMDS program is now post Milestone III (Production). The CH-53E IMDS Non-Recurring (NR) costs are fully vested. MH-53E NRE efforts will begin in FY07.



(Exhibit P-3a)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit P-3a





CONTRACT DATES: FY 2007

DELIVERY DATE: FY 2007

($ in Millions)

Cost: FY 2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 TO COMPLETE

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

FY 2007 (1) kits 0.1 1 1 0

0 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 1

Out 1

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 1

Out 1

Notes:

1. Trainer kit procured with FY07 supplemental funds will be installed in FY08.

TOTAL

To Complete Total

H-53E Integrated Mechanical Diagnostics Systems (

Field Mod Teams

63

CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32),(CH-53E-(22) LRIP Quant

FY2012 FY2013

Jul 07

Jan 08

FY 2007

Total



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

ERIP B-Kits

MH TiN B-Kits 29 7.7 29 7.7


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST


FY 2008

H-53 ERIP (OSIP 010-05 )

SAFETY, READINESS AND MAINTAINABILITYH-53 T-64 Turbo-shaft engines (462)

TOTALFY 2013PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 TO COMPLETEFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012FY 2007


T-64 419 Engine Titanium Nitride Erosion Resistant Coating: The T64 Engine Reliability Improvement Program (ERIP) upgrades top age related engine degraders, fatigue limiters and performance degradation on the T64 engine. This effort will modify the T64-GE-419 engine to incorporate erosion-resistant, titanium nitride-coated compressor airfoils.


T-64 419 Engine Titanium Nitride Erosion Resistant Coating: All development is complete for this program and hardware is ready for procurement. The configuration change to incorporate Titanium Nitride on the T64-GE-419 engine was approved in July 2006.



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

AAR-47 A kits 4 0.2 4 0.2

ALE-47 A kits 4 0.2 4 0.2

NVD A kits 4 0.2 4 0.2

RMWS A kits 4 0.2 4 0.2

CH-53D BFT A KITS 12 0.4 12 0.4

MH-53E BFT A KITS 22 0.7 22 0.7

CH-53E BFT A KITS 58 1.8 58 1.8


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

CH-53E VDE B KITS 2 0.5 2 0.5

CH-53D BFT B KITS 12 0.6 12 0.6

MH-53E BFT B KITS 22 1.1 22 1.1

CH-53E BFT B KITS 58 2.2 58 2.2


ECO 0.3 0.3

DATA 0.9 0.9


SUPPORT EQUIP 2 0.2 2 0.2

ILS 0.7 0.7


INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORT 0.6 0.6

INSTALLATION COST 24 2.1 92 116 2.1


Notes:


2. 24 kits installed in FY07 consist of 24 BFT kits. 92 kits installed in FY08 consist of 2 VDE kits, 16 ASE kits and 74 BFT kits.

3. Total quantity of 98 BFT kits installed includes 6 trainer kits.

FY 2008

H-53 MEDIVAC (OSIP 015-05 )

SAFETY, READINESS AND MAINTAINABILITYCH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total



Visually Degraded Environment (VDE): VDE is the greatest unmitigated challenge faced by Marine Aviation in its current operating environment. The loss of visual ground reference during night landings to unimproved, dusty landing zones is the greatest safety risk to H-53 aircrew, passengers and aircraft. The H-53 will continue to operate in VDE and continue to endanger flight crews and passengers while flying in a low altitude/low airspeed regime or landing in unimproved landing zones in conditions that may cause loss of a visual reference due to dust, snow, fog, smoke or darkness. A VDE solution will facilitate mission accomplishment in all degraded cueing environments, prevent degraded cueing environment mishaps and subsequent loss of life and assets. Reference: CH-53 Zero Visibility Landing System UNS # 06069UB, approved 27 Feb 06.

Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) Suite: The MH-53E has no ASE gear beyond a legacy flare/chaff dispenser and was not designed to be flown using Night vision Devices (NVD)s. However, the MH-53E has been repeatedly called upon to execute support missions in OIF. In order to operate in this tactical environment, the MH-53E must been given an effective ASE suite and have a cockpit compatible with NVDs. This funding covers the procurement and installation of an IR missile warning system, updates the existing flare/chaff dispenser, provides a ramp mounted weapon for self-defense, and a night vision capable cockpit.

FBCB2 Compliant Blue Force Tracker with Moving Map: H-53s continue to operate in remote locations around the world in joint environments. Situational awareness in these operating theaters is increasingly being done through a blue force tracking (BFT) system. The Army and Marine Corps have agreed to adopt a FBCB2 -based situational awareness tool. This funding is to pay for the procurement of eighty-two (82) additional off-the-shelf systems for all T/M/S H-53s & associated NRE. This effort provides a quick, fielded solution to the H-53 fleet, to provide Blue Force Tracker/Moving Map capability to increase cockpit navigational situational awareness, reduce the chance of friendly fire casualties and aircraft loss, and provide higher headquarters the ability to track H-53 flights in areas of reduced radio reception. It is a GPS integrated system that provides two-way location information utilizing FBCB2 (US Army BFT tracking software), while displaying a moving map to the aircrew via individual kneeboards for the pilot and co-pilot. It will permit the aircrew to quickly see their position relative to the map terrain and to automatically pass their position, location, and identification information (PLI) to higher headquarters for dissemination to other platforms in the region. At the same time, they will be able to receive PLI information from higher headquarters to track friendly unit movements, and to send and receive VMF messages. This system will also integrate with existing mission planning software (PFPS) to allow for much greater mission planning flexibility for the flight crew, especially during missions of low visibility. Operations in mountainous terrain has proven to be a significant challenge to communications and to higher headquarters' situational awareness.


VDE: PMA-261 is currently supporting development efforts underway at Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research. Ongoing development efforts have resulted in testing of Engineering Development Models (EDM) on a non-government owned H-1 aircraft. Continuing development efforts supported by PMA-261 will result in EDMs being flown on a government owned CH-53E aircraft for demonstration purposes and refinement of follow-on VDE requirements.

ASE: ALE-47, AAR-47 and NVD cockpit kits and installs funded with FY05 and FY06 Supplemental for 28 MH-53E aircraft. FY07 Supplemental will procure and install kits for the remaining 4 MH-53E aircraft.

FBCB2 Compliant Blue Force Tracker with Moving Map: Initial Funding provided via FY05 & FY06 GWOT supplemental enabled 32 aircraft integrations, val/ver of the CH-53E/D installation design and abbreviated DT/OT completing 4th Quarter FY06. Funds are required to conduct val/ver of MH-53E installation design & abbreviated DT/OT. Additionally, funding will complete procurement & installation requirements for all deployed aircraft supporting GWOT operations.



(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



FY 2007 (2) kits 0.5 2 2 1

0 0.5 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.5


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 2

Out 2

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 2

Out 2

Notes:

1. Kits procured with FY07 supplemental funds will be installed in FY08

TOTAL

To Complete Total

Visually Degraded Environment (VDE)

Field Mod Teams

126

CH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total

FY2012 FY2013

Dec 07

Dec 08

FY 2007

Total



(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



FY 2007 (98) kits* 24 1.3 74 98 1

24 1.3 74 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 98 1.3


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 24 24 25 25

Out 24 24 25 25

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 98

Out 98

Notes:

1. Kits procured with FY07 supplemental funds will be installed in FY07 and FY08

TOTAL

Total

FY 2007

FY2012 FY2013

To Complete Total

Sep 07

Jun 07

CH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total FBCB2 Compliant Blue Force Tracker (BFT) with Movi

Field Mod Teams

3 3



(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a







($ in Millions)

Cost: Qty FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 TO COMPLETE


FY 2007 (16) kits* 0.2 16 16 0.2

0 0.2 16 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 16 0.2


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 8 8

Out 8 8

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 16

Out 16

Notes:

1. Kits procured with FY07 supplemental funds will be installed inFY08

CH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total Aircraft Survivability Equipment (AAR-47, ALE-47,

Field Mod Teams

3 3

Jun 07

Sep 07

TOTAL

Total

Qty

FY2012 FY2013

To Complete Total



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

AFCB KITS 5 0.1

ON-BOARD WIRING DIAGNOSTICS 5 *

OFF-BOARD WIRING DIAGNOSTICS 32 *

MH-53E GCU & ADAPTER KIT 16 0.2


INSTALL EQUIPMENT


ECO

DATA 0.3 0.3

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP 14 1.1 14 1.1

ILS



INSTALLATION COST 5 0.1 5 0.1


Notes:


2. Installation Kits N/R provided for AFCS.

TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2007 FY 2013

H-53 A/C SUSTAINMENT (OSIP 008-06 )

MISSION/PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTCH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012PRIOR YEARS FY 2006


Automated Wiring Analysis System: The heavy lift capability of the CH/MH-53 aircraft is a major contributor to Fleet operations around the world to include deployed forces in Iraq, Bahrain, and the Horn of Africa. KAPTON wire degradation has and remains a top safety issue for the CH/MH-53 aircraft. In a recent mishapinvolving an uncommanded landing gear retraction during taxi, KAPTON was cited as probable cause due to wire degradation, due to wiring breakdown.In addition to two people being injured (one severely), repair will cost several million dollars and the aircraft will be out of service for a year or longer.This initiative will provide an enhanced technical capability for both the Organization and Intermediate Maintenance Levels to test, fault isolate, andtroubleshoot intermittent and deteriorated wiring to detect and potentially avoid future failures. Without corrective action, similar and other mishaps areprobable and will further exacerbate our ability to support and meet GWOT.

Aircraft Flight Control System: Addresses a low reliability and obsolescent analog AFCS computer (2 per aircraft) by retrofitting a digital AFCS computer modified from a proven and reliable H-60 system.

Arc Fault Circuit Breaker: Since 1986, Kapton Wiring has been identified by the SSWG as an HRI 6. All Lot 12 and earlier H-53s have Kapton Wiring installed. Of 224 total H-53E’s produced, 149 were produced with Kapton Wire installed (~67%). Since 1987, 43 Kapton Wire related Hazard Reports have been released (8 were released since 2000). The cost to re-wire a H-53 is approximate $1M per aircraft. New technologies are emerging to detect arcing faults on power wires.

Common Generator Control Unit: The generator control unit, also known as a supervisory regulator panel, provides control and protective functions for the generator. The CH53E and MH53E have 3 GCUs and the CH53D has 2 GCUs. The present GCU is an old design that suffers from parts obsolescence, poor reliability and high repair and replacement costs. Funding is provided for a Common GCU that corrects these issues. It supports multiple aircraft, allowing cost saving through common logistics.


Automated Wiring Analysis System: Ground testing completed, initial val/ver completed, procurements to begin in FY07.

Aircraft Flight Control System: Signed Technical Directive Letter for study to commence in 2nd quarter FY07. NRE scheduled to begin 4th quarter FY07.

Arc Fault Circuit Breaker: All hardware development is complete for this program and ready for procurement. This funding provides kits and installs to replace the current thermal circuit breakers with arc fault detecting circuit breakers and incorporates on-board and off-board wiring diagnostics systems that detect chafing and other wiring related failure modes before the aircraft systems are affected.

Common Generator Control Unit: This initiative replaces the present H-53 GCU with the new Common GCU. A Y-harness will be fabricated to adapt the Common GCU to existing aircraft wiring. This program is applicable to all H-53 TMS aircraft.



(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



FY 2007 (26) kits 5 0.1 5 0

5 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.1


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 5

Out 5

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 5

Out 5

Notes:

TOTAL

Total

FY 2007

FY2012 FY2013

To Complete Total

Apr 07

Feb 07

CH-53D (37), CH-53E (148), MH-53E (32), 217 Total H-53 A/C SUSTAINMENT (OSIP 008-06 )

SDLM

3 2



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

DIRCM A-Kits 3 0.9 3 0.9


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

DIRCM B Kits 2 5.2 2 5.2


ECO

DATA 0.2 0.2


SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.8 0.8





Notes:


2. Procurement of 3 A-kits and 2 B kits are for Validation/Verification

FY 2008

DIRCM (OSIP 010-008 )

SURVIVABILITYCH-53E (148)


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: Currently, the H-53E has only IR detection equipment and rudimentary flares for use as CM. This funding is for NRE, ECP development, A-kit and B-kit (removable mission kit) procurement and installation for validations/verification, and flight testing of DIRCM systems for CH-53Es. This system will help protect the H-53E which is highly susceptible to IR seeking manpads, the weapon of choice in all current theaters. This system has been found effective against fourth generation IR manpads, and is extremely effective against the most-common first generation manpads. PMA-272 will be contracting and procuring the production P-kits for PMA-261. This effort leverages on the RDT&E project under Program Element 0604272N, Project Unit 3166, TADIRCM (PMA-272), which has requested $80.9M in FY07 Supplemental funding.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: DIRCM TAP completed successfully in Aug 2006. Full aircraft installation, validation, and test to be completed in 2007. Full rate production and aircraft installs to begin in early FY08.



(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



FY 2007 (3) kits 1.1 3 3 1

0 1.1 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 1.1


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 1 2

Out 1 2

FY2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 3

Out 3

TOTAL

To Complete Total

DIRCM (OSIP 010-008 )

FMT

33

CH-53E (148)

FY2012 FY2013

Dec 06

Mar 07

FY 2007

Total



(Exhibit P-3a)






TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY

COST (In Millions) 0.0 A 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0

FY 2007

Budget FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

Baseline Title IX Supplemental Total

23.5 0.0 16.0 39.5

Narrative Description17-00 HELO INTG MECH DIAGN 0.2 0.209-03 SAFETY RELATED SYSTEM UPGRADE 4.2 7.0 11.3

16-04 MH-60S AMCM/ARMED HELO 3.8 3.8

26-04 AIR AMBULANCE 0.0 8.4 8.4

17-05 HIGH STRENGTH SONAR CABLE SH-60F 0.2 0.2

01-06 MH-60R ARMED BLOCK I UPGRADE 4.9 4.9

18-06 H-60 DRUG INTERDICTION FLIR 0.0 0.0

08-07 H-60 HVBSS 4.0 0.5 4.5

09-07 MH-60S WARFIGHTING CAPABILITY 6.2 6.2

04-11 AUTOMATIC RADAR PERISCOPE DET DES 0.0 0.0

23.5 16.0 39.5

February 2007

053000, SH-60 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

DESCRIPTION: This line item funds modifications to H-60 series aircraft supporting Global War On Terror (GWOT)Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) requirements. The H-60 series program of record is comprised of: 38 HH-60H, 147SH-60B, 72 SH-60F, 149 MH-60S, 46 MH-60R. The HH-60H is a Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) and Special WarfareSupport (SWS) helicopter assigned to carrier airwings aboard CVs and also in two reserve squadrons. The primarymissions of the SH-60B are Anti-Submarine (ASW) and Surface Warfare (SUW). The SH-60F is an ASW, dipping sonarhelicopter assigned to carrier airwings based aboard aircraft carriers (CV). The SH-60F primary mission isprotection of the CV inner zone. The MH-60S is the Fleet Combat Support (HC) Helicopter. The primary missionsof the MH-60S are Vertical Replenishment (VERTREP), Search and Rescue (SAR), Organic AMCM (OAMCM), SurfaceWarfare (SUW), Extended Maritime Interdiction Operations (EMIO), and Navy Organic Combat Search and Rescue(CSAR). The overall goal of the modifications budgeted is for the MH-60S Air Ambulance, SH-60F/SH-60B/HH-60HAutomated Identification System (AIS), HH-60H/MH-60S FBCB2 Blue Force Tracker (BFT), and SH-60B M-240. Thespecific modifications budgeted and programmed are:

Basis of Request:The overall goal of the modifications budgeted is for the MH-60S Air Ambulance, SH-60F/SH-60B/HH-60H Automated Identification System (AIS), HH-60H/MH-60S FBCB2 Blue Force Tracker (BFT), and SH-60B M-240.

AIS: (OSIP 09-03) Requested by Sea Shield (C3F) and endorsed by Sea Strike in the AIS CONOPS document, dtd 02 Feb 06, rapid deployment of AIS capability will enable CSG Commanders the ability to sort white forces and address capability gaps in the Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA). BFT: (OSIP 09-03) US Army and US Marine Corps helicopter forces closing toward 100% retrofit. US Navy Combat Search and Rescue, Close Air Support, and Special Warfare helicopters require system for Joint force commonality.Air Ambulance: (OSIP 26-04) AIR AMB Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF): Joint OIF sourcing order (Executive Order (EXORD) 06-08) details Navy requirement to source the USA equivalent of 70% of an overall AIR AMB company. TYCOM decision to source solely with MH-60S type model series implies (6) MH-60S AIR AMB deployed for 1+ years as a follow-on rotation to current commitment. Deployed requirement implies Home Guard Force Structure of (3) additional MH-60S aircraft for training, scheduled maintenance, redeployment, and attrition as needed. AIR AMB modifications include aircraft survivability equipment and desert, communication, navigation and medical elements, all of which have been sustained as requirements for the OIF theater. Resourcing requires MH-60S squadrons to support the Global War On Terrorism deployment requirement, freeing the current HH-60H AIR AMB aircraft to return to planned Carrier Strike Group (CSG) rotation. Additional (5) aircraft modified through this supplemental request will bring MH-60S force structure to (9) total aircraft (including (4) MH-60S from FY05 Supplemental).M-240: (OSIP 08-07) M240-D procurement provides support for Anti-Terrorism / Force Protection (ATFP), Extended Maritime Interdiction Operations (EMIO), and Special Operations Forces (SOF). Funding will provide M-240D weapon systems to provide increased rate-of-fire, reliability and interoperability with joint forces for (18) SH-60B FY07 Carrier Strike Group deployers.

Impact if funds are not provided: US Navy H-60 helicopter forces will be unable to meet current pace of our operational commitments. Other service force structure will be required to meet theatre commander requirements.






MODIFICATION TITLE:



QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $RDT&EPROCUREMENTINSTALLATION KITS AIS 24 0.2 24 0.2 BFT 38 0.7 38 0.7INSTALLATION KITS N/R 0.5 0.5INSTALL EQUIPMENT AIS 24 1.2 24 1.2 BFT 38 1.7 38 1.7INSTALL EQUIPMENT N/R 1.4 1.4ECODATA 0.1 0.1TRAINING EQUIPSUPPORT EQUIPILSOTHER SUPPORTINTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORTINSTALLATION COST 62 1.2 62 1.2TOTAL PROCUREMENT 186 7.0 186 7.0

SAFETY RELATED SYSTEM UPGRADE (OSIP 009-03 )

OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTSH-60B, SH-60F, HH-60H


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION (SH-60B, SH-60F, HH-60H): Automated Identification System (AIS) is an international standard for commercial merchant fleets designed to enhance safety-of-navigation. The systemacts as a Interrogation-Friend-or-Foe (IFF) type system, and is mandated for merchant vessels longer than 33m. AIS data will be used in the conduct of direct action under expiditionary maritimeinterdiction operations (EMIO) against non-compliant target vessels across all GWOT theaters. Supplemental request is to retrofit AIS capability into two complete CSG helicopter complements. Capabilityis for (24) systems: (12) SH-60B; (8) SH-60F; (4) HH-60H.FY07 Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Blue Force Tracker (BFT) is required for Joint operations in OIF. BFT provides 2-way,near-real time force location and threat display to improve Command and aircraft combat situational awareness and mitigate fratricide incidences. BFT funding retrofits (34) HH-60H and (4) MH-60S deployedaircraft

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: Federated AIS proof of concept demonstrator was developed in FY05 using primarily off the shelf components and flown on HSL-44 SH-60B aircraft during C2Xand 6 month deployment. COMHSMWSL has developed draft AIS CONOPS and is continuing work on the AIS requirements documents. HH-60H FBCB2 BFT will leverage Air Ambulance BFT development. BFT effort is anintegration of mature GFE/CFE systems.



(Exhibit P-3a)





($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits FY 2006 () kits FY 2007 (24) kits 24 0.3 24 0.3


0 0.0 0 0.0 24 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 24 0.3


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 12 12

Out 12 12

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 24

Out 24


0

Total

Prior Years

FY 2007

Jun 07

Jan-07

SH-60B, SH-60F, HH-60H AIS (OSIP 009-03)

Contractor Field Mod Team

3 5



(Exhibit P-3a)





($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits FY 2006 () kits FY 2007 (38) kits 38 0.9 38 0.9


0 0.0 0 0.0 38 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 38 0.9


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 12 12 14

Out 6 11 11 10

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 38

Out 38

HH-60H, MH-60S BFT (OSIP 009-03)


2 2

Jan-07

Mar 07

TOTAL

Total

PRIOR YEARS

FY 2007




(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:


FISCAL YEARQTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $

RDT&EPROCUREMENTINSTALLATION KITS (A KITS)

ASE (MH-60S) 5 0.6 5 0.6COMM/NAV (MH-60S) 5 0.1 5 0.1DESERT KIT (MH-60S) 5 0.0 5 0.0MEDEVAC KIT (MH-60S) 5 0.3 5 0.3INSTALLATION KITS N/R 0.1 0.1INSTALL EQUIPMENT (B KITS)ASE (MH-60S) 5 2.6 5 2.6COMM/NAV (MH-60S) 5 0.5 5 0.5DESERT (MH-60S) 5 0.5 5 0.5MEDEVAC (MH-60S) 5 1.2 5 1.2INSTALL EQUIPMENT N/R 0.3 0.3ECO 0.4 0.4DATA 1.0 1.0TRAINING EQUIPSUPPORT EQUIPILS 0.1 0.1OTHER SUPPORT 0.2 0.2INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORTINSTALLATION COST 40 0.5 40 0.5TOTAL PROCUREMENT 80 8.4 80 8.4


TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

AIR AMBULANCE (OSIP 026-04)

OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTMH-60S


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: OSD directed the Department of the Navy to source 70% equivilant of USA Aeromedical Evacuation Company for OIF 06-08. This modification configures (5) MH-60S helicopters with improved communication and navigation capabilities (COMM/NAV), aircraft survivability equipment (ASE), and enhancements for improved aircraft supportability in the desert environment (Desert Kit). This modification also adds medical capabilities required for Aeromedical patient movement while maintaining critical levels-of-care (MEDEVAC). The COMM/NAV initiatives include the following: MH-60S Aircraft Operating Program (AOP) software upgrade to provide Military Grid Reference System (MGRS) formats, MH-60S GPS anti-jam system (GAS-1), Blue Force Tracker (BFT) and Advanced Wireless Intercom System (AWICS). The ASE initiatives for MH-60S provide a stand-alone self-defense suite (SDS) including ALQ-144AV, ALE-47, AAR-47V2 and a ballistic protection system (BPS). Further ASE improvements include development and procurement / installtion of upturned exhaust provisions to reduce aircraft vulnerability. The Desert Kit enhancements include: Engine Inlet Barrier Filtration (EIBF), Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Inlet Barrier filtration (AIBF), ALQ-144 filtration kits, Infra-Red (IR) anti-collision lights, rotor-blade sand-erosion mitigation engineering,and dynamic component supportability improvements. The MEDEVAC mission elements include Litter Management Systems (LMS) to support up to six littered patients, Medical Equipment Sets (MES) and MES storage systems (MSS) to provide enroute patient care, and Fast Tactical Imaging (FTI) systems to provide advanced patient condition and vital data.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: Joint Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Sourcing Order (EXORD 06-08) details Navy Requirement to source the USA equivalent of 70% of an overall Air Ambulance company. Currently (8) aircraft (4) HH-60H and (4) MH-60S aircraft have been fully retrofitted to partially meet the Air Ambulance requirements from the EXORD. FY07 Supplemental funding will provide (5) additional Air Ambulance aircraft to bring MH-60S force structture to (9) total aircraft.

Totals may not add due to rounding P-1 Shopping List Item No 32CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

(Exhibit P-3a, page 5 of 7)


Exhibit P-3a







($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (40) kits 40 0.5 40 0.5

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits

TO COMPLETE0 0.0 0 0.0 40 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 40 0.5


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 20 12 8

Out 15 10 10 5

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 40

Out 40

MH-60S AIR AMBULANCE (OSIP 026-04)


3 2

Jan-07

Mar 07

TOTAL

Total

PRIOR YEARS

FY 2007

FY 2012 FY 2013

To Complete Total




MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

M240 (SH-60B) 16 0.5 16 0.5


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST




H-60 HVBSS (OSIP 008-07)

OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTSH-60B


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: M240 7.62mm machine gun kits, replacing obsolete M-60D gun systems. M240D weapon system to provide increased rate-of-fire, reliability and interoperability with joint forcesfor (18) SH-60B FY07 CSG deployers for anti-terrorism / Force Protection (ATFP), expanded maritime interdication operations (EMIO) ans special operations. SH-60B aircraft are detached to DESRON units; WSPDrequirements are (3) weapons per 2-plane detachment and (2) weapons per 1-plane detachment.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: M-240D are systems integrated on other H-60 helicopter platforms and are off-the-shelf procurements. Lead time for all systems 30-90 days.



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


031-92 UH-1 NTIS 18.0 18.0

TOTAL 18.0 18.0

FY 2007

Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

4.4 18.0 22.4


COMPLETEFY 2006

February 2007


P-40

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2007

DESCRIPTION: UH-1N Navigation Thermal Imaging System (NTIS) BRITE Star (AN/AAQ-22D). BRITE Star is animproved Electro-Optical sensor with an eye safe laser rangefinder, a laser designator and charge coupled dayTV camera for increased target detection, recognition and identification. When combined with FYDP funding thissupplemental request will continue acceleration of BRITE Star implementation to meet fleet (UH-1N/Y)requirements. APN-5 funding ($38.807M) will provide 37 upgrades from the existing AN/AAQ-22C. Thisinitiative accelerates the implementation ofAN/AAQ-22D BRITE Star NTIS for the UH-1N Warfighter. Unit costlisted is the average of procurements, and associated logistics. BRITE Star will also move forward to theUH-1Y as a planned product improvement. $2M of the total APN-5 amount above ($38.807M) is included forintegration into the UH-1Y. The impact if funds are not provided is that the fleet will continue using existingStar SAFIRE NTIS (AN/AAQ-22C) and be unalbe to designate from PIM laser coded precision guided munitions.






MODIFICATION TITLE:

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: UH-1N/UH-1Y, ASSOCIATED TRAINERS AND LABS TYPE MODIFICATION:



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS 2 0.1 2 .1

INSTALLATION KITS N/R 0.2 .2

INSTALL EQUIPMENT

BRITE STAR II 13 14.7 13 14.7


ECO 0.1 .1

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.6 .6



INSTALLATION COST * 2 2 *




UH-1 NTIS( OSIP 031-92 )

SAFETY


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: UH-1N Navigation Thermal Imaging System (NTIS) BRITE Star (AN/AAQ-22D). BRITE Star is an improved Electro-Optical sensor with an eye safe laser rangefinder, a laserdesignator and charge coupled day TV camera for increased target detection, recognition and identification.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: The NTIS is a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) item. BRITE Star II development completes in FY06/FY07, Test FY06 fielding schedule for FY07/FY08.



(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a







($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS (0) kits 0 0

FY 2006 (0) kits 0 0

FY 2007 (2) kits * 2 2 *

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE 0 0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 * 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 *



FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 2

Out 2

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 2

Out 2

UH-1N, UH-1Y H-1 Series

CONTRACTOR FIELD MOD TEAM

9 6

N/A N/A Jun-07 N/A

N/A N/A Dec-07 N/A

TOTAL

Total

Prior Years

FY 2007

FY 2012 FY 2013

To Complete Total



(Exhibit P-3a)






TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


029-94 ASUW IMPROV. PROG. 18.8 18.8

006-08 P-3 MISSION SYSTEMS 5.5 5.5

TOTAL 24.3 24.3


FY 2007

Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007


263.9* 62.5 24.3 288.2

*Baseline budget includes Title IX funds

Reason funds are required

FY 2006

February 2007

053800, P-3 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40


TO COMPLETE

DESCRIPTION: This line item funds modifications to P-3 aircraft. The P-3 Orion is a 4 engine, long-rangemaritime surveillance aircraft which performs Under Sea Warfare (USW), Surface Warfare (SW) and Intelligence,Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) in support of battle group and littoral operations in direct support ofSea Shield and Forcenet pillars of Seapower 21.

P-3 aircraft mods funded under the APN line have heavily supported recent Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) andGlobal War on Terrorism (GWOT) operations. Without key technology upgrades and aggressive obsolescencemanagement, P-3 aircraft will be unable to meet Fleet Response Plan (FRP) requirements, leaving key Seapower 21capabilities in support of the Combatant Commanders at risk. This P-3 Sustainment Bridge provides a roadmapthrough Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA) Full Operational Capability (FOC), ensuring sufficient P-3assets for Fleet and Combatant Commanders to fulfill operational and training/readiness requirements.

-Tactical Common Data Link (TCDL): To procure fully integrated production systems to outfit all remaining AIP aircraft, provide 4 additional ground stations for the Tactical Support Centers, provide training units and appropriate logistics support to the warfighter. With the integration of TCDL in support of OEF/OIF, the Task Force commander on the ground will achieve unprecedented levels of real time situational awareness. Without this capability, commanders will not have the tool which supports real time tactical decisions.

-P-3 Block Modification Upgrade Program (BMUP) Aircraft Survivability Modification: All BMUP aircraft require full survivability modifications prior to departure. The survivability modkit will include AAR/ALE-47, IR Strobes, ARC-210 UHF, protected-ILS, Suppressant Fuel Tank Foam and IFC/ECP preparation, parts procurement and program management. Funds 8 BMUP aircraft expected to be available to receive these mods in FY07. Since this effort will be funded by JIEDDO, there will be no impact if not funded.

-Essential Mission Systems, including Radar, ESM, EO/IR, OASIS, PEPS, Link 16 and SATCOM: Required to achieve Ready for Tasking rates during operations. There will be a significant risk that a P-3C primary mission system will be unrepairable if funding is not accelerated to eliminate obsolescence concerns immediately. This could effectively down an aircraft during operations and will result in an inability to meet GWOT and other forward deployed mission requirements.





MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

PHASED CAPABIL UPGRD SUPPLEMENTAL 0.0

TCDL SUPPLEMENTAL 23 8.1 23 8.1

BMUP ASE 8 2.8 8 2.8


ECO

DATA 0.2 0.2

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.2 0.2





Note: The cost of "A" and "B" kits for TCDL, PCU LINK 16 AND BMUP ASE are not separately priced.

ASUW IMPROV. PROG.( OSIP 029-94 )

Operational ImprovementP-3C


TCDL; With long range Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and extended range electro-optics (EO), the aircraft is now capable of providing real-time, high definition video imagery (satellite quality videoimages of ground terrain, structures and targets). With the integration of TCDL in support of OEF/OIF, the Task Force Commander on the ground is achieving unprecedented levels of real time situationalawareness.

BMUP ASE: BMUP aircraft require full survivability modification prior to departure for theater deployment. The survivability mod kit will include the AAR/ALE-47, IR Strobes , ARC-210 UHF , Protected-ILS,Suppressant Fuel Tank Foam.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: This modification makes maximum use of previously developed subsystems.



(Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: P-3C MODIFICATION TITLE: Anti-Surface Warfare (ASUW) Improvement Program (OSIP 29-94) TCDL Installations


METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION: Contractor Field Mod Team


CONTRACT DATES: FY 2006: FY 2007: 04/07 FY 2008: FY 2009:

DELIVERY DATE: FY 2006: FY 2007: 01/08 FY 2008: FY 2009:

($ in Millions)

Cost: Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete TOTALQty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

FY 2005 & PY () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (23) kits * 2.3 23 * 23 2.3

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits To Complete () kits

TOTAL * 2.3 23 * 23 2.3

*FY07 Supplemental funds (23) installs in FY08.


FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011& Prior 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 5 6 6 6

Out 5 6 6 6

FY 2012 FY 2013 To

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Complete TOTAL

In 23

Out 23


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit P-3a)


Exhibit P-3a

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: P-3C MODIFICATION TITLE: Anti-Surface Warfare (ASUW) Improvement Program (OSIP 29-94) BMUP ASE


METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION: Contractor Field Mod Team


CONTRACT DATES: FY 2006: FY 2007: 01/08 FY 2008: FY 2009:

DELIVERY DATE: FY 2006: FY 2007: 01/09 FY 2008: FY 2009:

($ in Millions)

Cost: Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete TOTALQty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

FY 2005 & PY () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (8) kits * 3.2 8 * 8 3.2

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits To Complete () kits

TOTAL * 3.2 8 * 8 3.2

*FY07 Supplemental funds (8) installs in FY08.


FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011& Prior 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 3 3 2

Out 3 3 2

FY 2012 FY 2013 To

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Complete TOTAL

In 8

Out 8


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT


ECO 0.3 0.3

DATA 0.1 0.1



ILS 0.1 0.1




NOTE: No Install Schedule is depicted because the systems are form fit functions done at an Organization Level.

P-3 MISSION SYSTEMS( OSIP 006-08 )

Operational ImprovementP-3C


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: The Navy's Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force (primarily P-3C Orion aircraft) provides three deliverables to Navy and Joint commanders worldwide: Undersea warfare;Intelligence Surveillance, and Reconnaissance; and Maritime Surveillance Targeting. The P-3C Mission Systems Sustainment program will ensure that the P-3C aircraft continues to meet the Navy's requirementto perform Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW), Anti-Surface Warfare (ASUW), Over-the-Horizon Targeting (OTH-T), and Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) until Full OperationalCapability (FOC) of MMA is achieved (2019). Sustaining the sensor capabilities provided by the APS-137D (V) 5 imaging radar, the Advanced Imaging Multi-Spectral Sensor (AIMS) electro optical/infraredsystem, ALR 95 ESM, Tactical Common Data Link (TCDL), small circular area of probability weapon system (Maverick, SLAM, SLAM-ER, provisions to carry and launch all Mil Std 1760 Digital weapons with DigitalStores Management System, ALE-47/AAR-47 missile warning countermeasures due to obsolescence is essential in order to maintain these vital capabilities. Additional systems and capabilities may be requiredin order to remain effective in the Sea Power 21 Construct. These systems include but are not limited to: APS 137 radar; Acoustic systems, AIMS EO/IR; MATT; Link 16; Global Communication & ControlSystem - Maritime (GCCS-M); Precision Targeting Workstation (PTW); OASIS; Video Distribution Controller (VDC); Tactical Mission Computer; ALR-95 ESM; DAMA Satcom; MST; TCDL; Recorders including the HighResolution Digital Recorder; ALE47/AAR47; Digital Stores Management System (DSMS); all weapon systems including missiles, torpedoes, mines, as well as acoustic system upgrades. These improvements are a vital element of the P-3 sustainment bridge, significantly enhancing the strategy of a smaller, more ready, more capable P-3 force during the bridge to Multi-Mission MaritimeAircraft (MMA). P-3 C Mission Systems Sustainment is a branch of the ASW Maritime Improvement program (AMIP) to provide for obsolescence, technology refresh and technology insertion to P-3C mission

t

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: This modification makes maximum use of previously developed subsystems.



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


The specific modifications budgeted and programmed are:

014-07 SATCOM Connectivity Enhancement 7.0 7.0

TOTAL 7.0 7.0

Aircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40 February 2007

054400, E-2 SERIES

FY 2011 FY 2012OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2013

TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010

DESCRIPTION:

This Satellite Communication (SATCOM) Connectivity Enhancement is a new start effort that will replace the current turnstile SATCOMAntenna (used on E-2C Group II aircraft) with Conic Spiral SATCOM Antenna (used on E-2C Hawkeye 2000 (HE2K) production aircraft) toprovide better SATCOM connectivity, range and communication reliability for 32 non-Hawkeye 2000 aircraft (27 Nav-Upgrade aircraft and5 Mission Computer Unit/Advanced Control Indicator Set (MCU/ACIS) aircraft). The region covered during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) operations requires a Ultra High Frequency (UHF) SATCOM antenna to perform at low look angles, which is based on the geometrical location of the satellite system. The current turnstile SATCOM antenna used on E-2C Group II, Group II Navigation Upgrade (NU) and Mission ComputerUpgrade (MCU) aircraft is insufficient at low look angles such as those experienced in OEF, causing degraded SATCOM voice connectivity.


9.050 0 7.000 16.050


Classification: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: TYPE MODIFICATION: Mission Performance Enhancement



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

SATCOM Connectivity Enhancement *32 6.0 32 6.0


INSTALL EQUIPMENT


ECO

DATA 0.2 0.2



ILS





* Install Kit Quantity includes 1 Validation/Verification kit.

SATCOM Connectivity Enhancement (OSIP 014-07)

E-2C



This funding is for equipment needed to improve the protection of deployed forces by substantially enhancing the E-2C's Satellite Communication (SATCOM) connectivity. This improvement addresses the E-2C'sOEF squadron's documented SATCOM connectivity deficiencies with current turnstile antenna. This upgrade replaces current turnstile SATCOM Antenna (used on E-2C Group II aircraft) with Conic Spiral SATCOMAntenna (used on E-2C Hawkeye 2000 (HE2K) production aircraft) to provide better SATCOM connectivity, range and communications reliability for 32 non-Hawkeye 2000 aircraft (27 Navigation Upgrade aircraftand 5 Mission Computer Unit/Advanced Control Indicator Set (MCU/ACIS) aircraft).


Totals may not add due to rounding P-1 Shopping List Item No 37Page 2 of 3

CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (32) kits * 0.3 32 * 32 0.3

FY 2008 () kits

FY 2009 () kits

FY 2010 () kits

FY 2011 () kits

FY 2012 () kits

FY 2013 () kits

TO COMPLETE () Kits* 0.3 32 * 32 0.3

* FY07 Supplemental funds (32) installs in FY08. 1 kit is validation & verification kit.


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 8 8 8 8

Out 8 8 8 8

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 32

Out 32

E-2C SATCOM Connectivity Enhancement (OSIP 014-07)

Depot Field Mod Team

3 9

SATCOM Antenna

Jan-07

Oct 07

TOTAL

Total

PRIOR YEARS

FY 2007

FY 2012 FY 2013

To Complete Total

Totals may not add due to rounding P-1 Shopping List Item No 37Page 3 of 3

CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

020-03 ASE 29.8 0.0 29.8

TOTAL 0.0 0.0 29.8 0.0 29.8

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS TOTAL

TO COMPLETE

February 2007

056000, C-130 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

Narrative Description:This item funds modifications to C/KC-130 aircraft. The Lockheed C/KC-130 aircraft is a fourengine, high-wing, all metal, long range, land based monoplane capable of all weather transport of cargo orpersonnel and in-flight refueling. There are currently 98 aircraft in the Navy and Marine Corps inventory(50 active and 48 reserve). The expected Service Life is as follows:

T/M/S Service Date Service Life Expected LifeC-130T 10/91 - 11/95 450 mos. 2028-2032KC-130F 03/60 - 11/62 600 mos. 2010-2012KC-130R 09/75 - 06/78 480 mos. 2015-2018KC-130T 04/84 - 02/96 450 mos. 2021-2033KC-130J 09/00 - 10/13 450 mos. 2037-2048

Basis for Supplemental Request:The FY 2007 Supplemental Request provides for procurement of floor and side panels in the flight station and paratroop door kits to improve aircraft survivability.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 4.6 0.00 29.8 34.4 Reason funds are requiredCurrent armor configuration has limited crew protection. This request will provide for full cockpit armor for crew protection. Impact if not funded: The aircrew and aircraft will be susceptible to battle damage resulting in loss of aircraft and souls. DECM/NVL equipped aircraft are a CENTCOM requirement for operations in theater. DECM/NVL reduces risk of combat losses due to IR/RF threats. Impact if not funded: Increased risk of USMC aircraft combat losses due to the IR/RF threat in the CENTCOM.






MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

47(5F/7R/8KT)

KC-130 DECM A-KIT 7 26.6 7 26.6

KC-130J ARMOR A-KIT

KC-130T NVL KIT


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

AAR-47 B-KIT 7 0.4 7 .4

ALE-47 B KIT 7 0.4 7 .4

C-130 APR-39 B KIT 7 1.5 7 1.5

C-130T ARMOR

C-130T FUEL FOAM TANK KIT

KC-130F/R/T FUEL TANK FOAM KITS

KC-130J ARMOR B-KIT 7 1.0 7 1.0


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST



2. DECM and NVL efforts are utilizing a turnkey procurement and installation strategy to shorten Production Lead Time.


A/C Survivability Equip (ASE) (OSIP 020-03)

SafetyC/KC-130F/R/T

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:Subject funding is being used to improve aircraft survivability by upgrading or replacing certain Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (DECM), installing Fuel Tank Foam, andinstalling ballistic armor protection.DECM Upgrades/Replacements: the existing AN/AAR-47 Missile Warning System (MWS), AN/ALQ-157(V)1 Infrared Countermeasures (IRC) system, and replacing the AN/ALE-39Countermeasure Dispensing System (CMDS).The AN/AAR-47(V)2 (MWS) improves performance over the existing system in the following areas: reduction in signal noise and false alarms, increased sensorsensitivity and range, greater detection efficiency, extends the overall temperature range sensed, and improves reliability. The new AN/ALQ-157(V)2 IRCM provides many reliability and maintainabilityenhancements.The new AN/ALE-47 CMDS is an integrated, threat adaptive, reprogrammable, computer-controlled expendable dispensing system.Installation of fuel tank foam in the main, external, andauxiliary fuel tanks reduces the susceptibility of loss or severe damage to the aircraft and loss of life from fuel fire/tank rupture due to surface-to-air or air-to-air fire. The installation of ballisticarmor provides crew protection and enhances aircraft survivability.




(Exhibit P-3a)








($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits

FY 2006 () kits

FY 2007 (14) kits 14 29.8 14 29.8

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE (14) kits 0 0 0

14 29.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 14 29.8


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 14

Out 14

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 14

Out 14

FY 2012 FY 2013

PRIOR YEARS

Dec 06

Jun 07

FY 2007

Total

A/C Survivability Equip (ASE) (OSIP 020-03)

Contractor Drive-In Modification

56

C/KC-130F/R/T

0

0

TOTAL

To Complete Total



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


019-07 C-9B Engine Modifications 4.3 4.3

TOTAL 4.3 4.3

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013TO

COMPLETE TOTALFY 2006 FY 2007

February 2007

056200, CARGO TRANSPORT A C SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPRIOR YEARS FY 2008

Narrative Description: This line item funds modifications to the following cargo and transport aircraft which includes SB 5021 for C-9B engines: (C-9B/DC-9B, C-40A, C-20A/D/G, C-37A/B, UC-35C/D, RC-12F/M, UC-12B/F/M, NC-12B and EC/RC-26D.

The C-9B/DC-9B Skytrain II, C-40A Clipper, C-20A/D/G Gulfstream IV, C-37A/B Gulfstream V and UC-35C/D Cessna Citation, are commercial twin jet transport aircraft that provide time-critical medium lift logistic support for the fleet combatant commanders. C-9/DC-9 is capable of carrying up to 32,000 pounds of cargo and personnel for over 3,300 nautical miles at a maximum speed of 430+ knots. C-40 can accommodate 121 passengers, or 8 pallets of cargo, or a combination configuration of 3 pallets and 70 passengers with a range of 3,400 nautical miles. C-20D/G is capable of high-speed transport of 13 passengers or cargo over a range of 4,100 nautical miles at 437 knots. C-20A and C-37 provides worldwide executive transport to SECNAV, CNO, CMC, and Fleet Commanders. C-35 provides transport for high priority passenger/cargo missions with time, place or mission sensitive requirements. C-35 can accommodate six passengers or 1,200 pounds of cargo with a range of 1,300 nautical miles at 234 knots. The C-12 King Air and C-26 Metro variants are commercial twin turbo-prop aircraft that provide shorter-range light lift passenger/cargo transport and range control missions. C-12 is capable of carrying six passengers or maximum cargo capacity of 2,850 pounds, 1,075 nautical miles at 225 knots. C-26 is capable of carrying 19 passengers 1,300 nautical miles at 234 knots.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 30.210 0.000 4.259 34.469

Reason funds are requiredC-9 Engines without SB 5021 repeatedly overtemp, particularly in hot climates. Aircraft is used to carry USN/USMC personnel and equipment in/around CENTCOM supporting GWOT. C-9B aircraft support OEF and GWOT by carrying USN/USMC personnel intra-theater. 3,085 passengers and 228,000 lbs cargo used in direct support of OEF were carried by C-9B aircraft in CENTCOM during FY05. C-9B aircraft operating in hot climates experience an unsupportable quantity of high Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT) (overtemp) engines, which require extensive troubleshooting and repair. This modification effectively prevents engines from reaching high EGT and makes the engine more reliable. Between FY 2003-2005 the fleet reported 34 occurrences of these engines exceeding EGT limits. Overtemp is the C9 fleet’s #1 engine degrader. C-9B aircraft are operated by the U.S. Navy Reserve. Due to unreliability of existing configuration in warm climates, C-9 aircraft will not be able to effectively support OEF/OIF GWOT missions if this mod is not funded.

DD Form 2454, Jun 86P-1 Shopping List Item No 42


(Exhibit P-40)


Exhibit P-3a

MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

C-12 PROPELLERS

C-20

C-26

C-9

C-9 ENGINES 12 4.3 12 4.3

C-9 HUSH KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT


ECO

ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST



C-9B ENGINE MODIFICATIONS (OSIP-019-07)

SAFETY/RELIABILITYCARGO TRANSPORT A C SERIES


DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: Service Bulletins are reviewed for possible incorporation on an as required basis. Prototype verification has been previously accomplished and approvedby the FAA.

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: C-9 Engines without SB 5021 repeatedly overtemp, particularly in hot climates. Aircraft is used to carry USN/USMC personnel and equipment in/around CENTCOM supporting GWOT. C-9B aircraft support OEF and GWOT by carrying USN/USMC personnel intratheater. 3,085 passengers and 228,000 lbs cargo used in direct support of OEF were carried by C-9B aircraft in CENTCOM during FY05. C-9B aircraft operating in hot climates experience an unsupportable quantity of high Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT) (overtemp) engines, which require extensive troubleshooting and repair. This modification effectively prevents engines from reaching high EGT and makes the engine more reliable. Between FY 2003-2005 the fleet reported 34 occurrences of these engines exceeding EGT limits. Overtemp is the C9 fleet’s #1 engine degrader. C-9B aircraft are operated by the U.S. Navy Reserve.









TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


February 2007

056700, SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFTAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

Narrative Description:The Special Projects program modifies and/or replaces obsolete intelligence collection equipment as requiredin (6) P-3 aircraft. Procurements vary in each fiscal year and include common Navy systems for increasedcapability, reduced operator workload and common logistics. Active PAA inventory is 4 with additional 2 BAAaircraft in the Special Mission inventory. A total of 6 aircraft have been delivered. Funds will acquireBlue Force Tracking (BFT) and collection equipment necessary to conduct current GWOT operations.

FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 17.1 5.1 22.3

Reason funds are required and impact:Specific operational details can be provided in a classified forum.

Totals may not add due to roundingDD Form 2454, Jun 86 P-1 Shopping List Item No 45

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-40, page 1 of 2)


MODIFICATION TITLE:


Approval for full rate production is not required.



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

BFT Equipment 1.9 1.9

Collection Equipment 3.2 3.2


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST


INTELLIGENCE SENSORS( OSIP 019-97 )

Operational ImprovementP-3B/C


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: This modification replaces obsolescence intelligence collection equipment in six P-3 Special Project aircraft by:Funds will acquire Blue Force Tracking (BFT) equipment and collection equipment necessary to conduct current GWOT operations. Specific operational details can be provided in a classified forum.







PRIOR YEARS ID Code FY 2006

FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


February 2007

057500, AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODSAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

DESCRIPTION: The specific modifications budgeted and planned are:Non- Ejection Seat Aircrew Endurance HH-60H :Funding will introduce advanced-technology phase changing textiles and energy-absorbing foams in front lineUSN rotary wing aircraft that can attenuate crash impact loads and also provide the required seating support tomeet extended range missions. Aircrew fatigue is a growing operational concern and long term back and neckinjuries can develop due to lack of proper support. Current seat designs have rigid seating configurations thatincrease risk of injury due to crash impact loads. Hazard reports have highlighted the lack of seat endurance asa significant concern in meeting extended aircraft mission needs.


FY2007Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

$.413 -0- $.486 $.899


Funding will introduce advanced-technology phase changing textiles and energy-absorbing foams in front lineUSN rotary wing aircraft that can attenuate crash impact loads and also provide the required seating support tomeet extended range missions.






MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS 0.1 .1


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

HH-60H (2 per a/c) 78 * 1,000 *


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.1 .1

OTHER SUPPORT 0.3 .3


TOTAL PROCUREMENT 0.5 .5


NON-EJECTION SEAT AIRCREW ENDURANCE

SAFETYH-60H


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: Introduce new cushion systems into "non-ejection" aircraft with phase changing textiles to reduce/eliminate significant aircrew fatigue due to longer mission requirements. There are no installation costs.




(Exhibit P-3a)






TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITY


FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 35.7 0.0 34.9 97.7

OSIP No. / DESCRIPTIONPrior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete

072-88 AN/AAR-47 DETECTION 3.0

014-90 AN/APR-39(V)2 RWR 21.0

006-00 ALE-39 to 47 RETROFIT 10.9

TOTAL 34.9

February 2007

057600, COMMON ECM EQUIPMENTAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40

DESCRIPTION: This line item funds common equipment (B kits) for muliple aircraft. The overall goal of themodification budget is to provide a reprogrammable radar and missile warning system, provide attacking missiledeclaration and sector direction finding, laser detection, and self protection capability devices to applicableuser aircraft.

REASON FUNDS REQUIRED:

OSIP 72-88 AN/AAR-47 DETECTION: The requested funds are for procurement of five First Article Test (FAT) units for USMC/USN Operational Assessment of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to upgrade enhancements to AAR-47 to increase the probability of declaration of a threat and reduction of false warnings. There is an associated supplemental issue for RDT&E ($20M) funded in the FY07 Title IX Sup to complete the development of a ECP. Impact if funds are not provided: Delays needed improvements to enhance aircrew survivability.

OSIP 014-90 AN/APR-39(V)2 RWR: The requested funds will be used to improve maintainability and reliability and enhance operational performance of the integrated APR-39A/B(V)2 Radar Warning Receiver, Central Computer Processing Unit (CPU) and Radio Frequecny (RF) receivers for rotary wing aircraft in support of Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). Impact if funds are not provided: Hardware and software performance deficiencies noted in multiple platform DT/OT and obsolescence in existing Radio Warning Receiver (RWR) will not be corrected and the result we be degraded RF Warning situational awareness and response. Current systems will be unable to meet aircrew survivability requirements in current and future RF threat environments.

OSIP 006-00 ALE-39 TO 47 RETROFIT: Previous GWOT funds were used to retrofit all USMC Type/Model/Series (TMS) A/C with the advanced ALE-47 Countermeasures Dispensing Systems. These retrofit installations replaced the legacy ALE-39 dispenser hardware in their existing locations and dispensing direction. This Supplemental adds two additional dispensers per aircraft to increase the number of expendables carried onboard that will allow for increased survivability against advanced threats, pre-emptive dispensing and extending mission duration. The additional dispensers will be mounted in a new location and oriented for forward firing of the expendable countermeasures for increased effectiveness. In parallel with providing additional dispensers, expendable technique improvements will be developed for each TMS to maximize forward firing of countermeasures and additional expendables capacity. Impact if funds are not provided: The immediate benefits for increased aircraft survivability and mission duration will not be gained due to the limited quantity of expendables currently available. Highly effective forward firing expendables dispensing will not be available. Improved expendable countermeasures techniques needed to defeat advanced Infrared (IR) and RF threats using the latest modeling and simulation, threat data, and effectiveness testing will not be developed, leaving aircraft and aircrew vulnerable to an increasing threat environment.





MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

INSTALLATION KITS (B KITS) BV(2) PDX UPGRADE KITS 5 2.3 5 2.3


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

ECO (SENSOR UPGRADE EQUIP ECO)

FY05 SUP (CP UPGRADE EQUIP ECO)

FY05 Sup (Sensor Upgrade Equip)p yECO)

INSTALL EQUIP (AAR-47 EQUIP)

Title 9 Sup (Sensor Upgrade)


ECO

ECO (CP UPGRADE EQUIP ECO)

ECO (Dynamic Blanking)

FY05 Sup (Dynamic Blanking ECO)

Title 9 Sup (Dynamic Blanking)

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 0.2 .2

OTHER SUPPORT 0.5 .5



AN/APR-47 DETECTION (OSIP 072-88 )

MISSION CAPABILITYCH-46E, CH-53A/D/E, RH-53D, MH-53E, UH-1, AH-1, C-130, P-3, HH-60H, SH-60B, VH-3, VH-60, V-22


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: FY07 GWOT supplemental funding provided to upgrade currently fieldied AAR-47A(V)2 sensors. Upgrade will provide additional performance against fielded threats in thecurrent theaters of operation.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: Milestone II was passed in 1982. OPEVAL (on the CH-53E) was passed in October 1986.

Milestone III was passed in May 1987 for full production with extension of application to all other platforms. Production of 709 systems and preparation of a Level III data package followed, withdeliveries completed in early 1992. Under full and open competition, a contract for up to 1200 systems was awarded to Hercules (now Alliant) in December 1991. Actual orders were for 1122 systems withdeliveries completed in January 1997. Under full and open competition, a contract for up to 1077 systems was awarded to Lockheed Martin in September 1995. Deliveries began in January 1997 and were completed in July 1999.

There are two upgrade programs: The Computer Processor Microprocessor upgrade program FY97-FY99 replaced the 8086 MP board with an MP 80486 Board with new software to enhance threat declaration and tobetter control false alarms. The Second Upgrade; AAR-47(V)2 Sensor upgrade, contained two phases. Phase one upgraded the UV sensors with a solid state spectral filter assembly with embedded Laser Warningcapability. Phase two incorporated a Class I Sensor Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) (Dynamic Blanking) which upgraded the AAR-47(V)2 Sensors to the AAR-47A(V)2 sensor design. Due to the currentoperational environment a third Sensor Class I ECP is required which improves probability of detection in the current theaters of operation. The requested APN-5 funds will fund procurement of five FirstArtlcle Test units for USMC/USN/USAF Operational Assessment.



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

INSTALL KITS


INSTALL EQUIPMENT GWOT FY05 Supp (Install Equp)APR39A

INSTALL EQUIP (AVR-2)

INSTALL EQUIP AN/APR-39A/B(V)2

INSTALL EQUIP AN/APR-39A/B(V)X 5 1.5 5 1.5

Title 9 Supplemental (Install Equip)39a


ECO

ECO 14.0 14.0

DATA 1.0 1.0

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS 1.5 1.5




AN/APR-39(V)2 RWR( OSIP 014-90 )

MISSION CAPABILITY


AN/APR-39(V)2, AH-1W, AH-1Z, UH-1N, UH-1Y, HH-60H, MV-22, AN/V4-2/2(V), VH-3, VH-50, MH-60S


DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: The AN/APR-39A(V)2 Radar Signal Detecting Set (RSDS) is designed for use on US Marine Corps, US Navy, and US Army Assault Support aircraft to provide onboard warning of radarthreats. The AN/APR-39A(V)2 provides control and display of the entire Assault Support Equipment (ASE) Suite, and is required for control and display of the AN/AVR-2/2A(V) and the AAR-47. The systemconsists of five antenas, one Cockpit Control Unit, one or two Display indicators, two to four receivers, and one processor. The AN/AVR-2/2A(V) laser detection set (LDS) is designed for use on U.S. Army,U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Navy Assault Support aircraft. THe AN/AVR-2/2A(V) reduces the susceptability of helicopters to attack from laser guided and laser aided threats by providing warning of laserillumination. The system consists of four to six sensor units and one or two comparators. The system requires the APR-39A(V)2 Cockpit Control Unit for On/Off and BIT. AVR-2/2A(V) warnings are displayedon the APR-39A(V)2 cockpit display.

FY07 Supplemental funding will improve the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) integrated Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), APR-39A/B(V)2 Central Computer Processing Unit(CPU). This Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) will correct RWR deficiencies noted in AH-1W and recent MV-22 and KC-130T OpEval reports. The current RWR provides inaccurate, confusing, time-delayeddetection and identification of threat emitters causing loss of situational awareness to combat aircrews. The funds requested will correct hardware and software deficiencies and obsolescence inexisting RWR as well as required Operational Test & Evaluation to validate solutions. Funding includes (5) five first-article shipsets for testing, APR-39/AAR-47 hardware modification and softwarerefinement, FOT&E to validate solutions and perform platform test and integration to support all current RW and Assault Support platforms using ASE.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: The U.S. Army awarded a production contract for the AVR-2 in FY 1990 and for the AVR-2A(V) in FY 1994. Procurement for the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S.Navy is via Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) to the U.S. Army. The AN/APR-39A(V)2 is in the production phase of development (MSIII 3Q/96). The U.S. Navy is the lead service of thisjoint service program. The U.S. Army awarded the production contract 3Q/96, and continues to administer the contract. U.S. Navy delivery of production systems commenced June 1999. Procurement of anAN/AVR-2/2A(V) in the AN/APR-39(V)2 for the additional requiring platforms will be by extension of application with the required follow-on test and evaluation conducted on each platform.Version B of AN/APR-39A/B(V)2 is glass cock-pit compatible for H-1 upgrades.

Current efforts include integrating software and hardware of new Army APR-39A(V)X program CPU and Memory Circuit Card Assemblies (CCAs). MV22, H1 upgrades, MH-60S platforms have planned APN-1 procurementof APR-39 systems in FY 2008 to FY 2018 and beyond.



(Exhibit P-3a)


MODIFICATION TITLE:




RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

AV8 Install Kits (FY05 Sup)

EA6B Install Kits (FY06 Sup)

INSTALLATION KITS (A Kits) 100 1.8 100 1.8


INSTALL EQUIPMENT

INSTALL EQUIPMENT - B KITS 100 3.5 100 3.5

GWOT FY05 SUPP (Install Equip) B Kits

INSTALL EQUIP (39 SEQUENCER SWITCHES)

INSTALL EQUIP (TACAIR/HELOS)

Title 9 Supplemental (Install Equip)


ECO

ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS





CH-53E, AH-1W, CH-46E, UH-1N

ALE-39 to 47 RETROFIT( OSIP 006-00 )

PRIOR YEARS FY 2013 TO COMPLETE TOTALFY 2009

MISSION CAPABILITY

FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: The replacement of the AN/ALE-39 Dispenser System with the AN/ALE-47 Dispenser System will correct some serious safety problems and greatly improve aircraft survivability. TheAN/ALE-39 system has serious problems with Things Falling Off Aircraft (TFOA) as well as numerous occurrences of uncommanded firing of chaff and flare stores. The reliability of the ALE-39 is anothermajor factor with continuous reports of hung or unfired stores, a serious ground safety concern as well as serious aircraft survivability concern. The AN/ALE-47 System has been developed to correct thesafety issues of the ALE-39. USD(Acq) memo of November 1986 directed U.S. Navy and U.S. Army to participate in EMD phase. Requirements established by Air Force Statement of Operational RequirementsDocument (SORD) number 341.88-aa-D of 8 July 92. OSIP 006-00 had been cancelled beginning FY04, but operational requirements in support of the Global War on Terrorism have resulted in accelerated installsand additional aircraft being identified for retrofit incorporation.

FY-07 supplemental funding is provided to begin NRE and the installation of two additional dispensers mounted in forward-firing locations on USMC assault platforms.

DEVELOPMENT STATUS / MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES: The AN/ALE-47 System is in production and being installed in multiple U.S. Navy and Marine aircraft. MS III decision awarded March 1993. FY 2000 systemsprocured under Air Force contract F09603-01-D-0367. Future procurements to be ordered under U.S. Air Force production contract was awarded in November 2006. All Army and Special Forces platforms withself-protection systems have oriented their dispenser magazines to provide essential forward firing self-protection capability. This improvement has been implemented on USMC new AH-1Z and UH-1Y platformsand HQMC supports this capability on all assault/rotary wing aircraft. These new forward-firing dispensers require new countermeasure techniques specific to each Type/Model/Series due to differences in infra-red signature and exhaust suppression. This supplemental provides NRE for technique development using the latest accredited modeling and simulation, threat data and effectiveness training.



(Exhibit P-3a)



INSTALLATION INFORMATION: Previous AN/ALE-47 retrofit replaced existing legacy ALE-39 dispensers. Mod will add two more dispensers in a new, forward firing location.





($ in Millions)



PRIOR YEARS () kits 0 0

FY 2006 () kits 0 0

FY 2007 (100) kits 1.5 100 100 1.5

FY 2008 () kits 0 0

FY 2009 () kits 0 0

FY 2010 () kits 0 0

FY 2011 () kits 0 0

FY 2012 () kits 0 0

FY 2013 () kits 0 0

TO COMPLETE () 0 0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.5 100 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 100 1.5


FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 100

Out 10 20 30 40

FY 2011 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

In 100

Out 100

TOTAL

Mar-07

To Complete Total

FY 2012 FY 2013

Oct 07

FY 2007PRIOR YEARS

ALE-39 to 47 RETROFIT( OSIP 006-00 )

Depot Level Installations

73

CH-53E, AH-1W, CH-46E, UH-1N

Total



(Exhibit P-3a)





TO COMPLETE TOTAL

QUANTITYCOST (In Millions) B 3.5 3.5

022-01 MV-22 CORRECTION OF DEFIENCIES AND PRE BLOCK A THROUGH C(OSIP 022-01) 3.5 3.5TOTAL 3.5 3.5

FY 2006

February 2007

059000, V-22 SERIESAircraft Procurement, Navy / APN5 Aircraft Modifications

P-40


TO COMPLETE

DESCRIPTION: The V-22 is a tilt-rotor, vertical takeoff and landing aircraft currently being developed forjoint service application. The program is being designed to provide an aircraft to meet theamphibious/vertical assault needs of the Marine Corps, the strike rescue needs of the Navy, and supplementUSSOCOM special mission aircraft. The aircraft will be capable of flying 2,100 miles with one refueling,giving the Services the advantage of a Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing (V/STOL) aircraft that couldrapidly self-deploy to any location in the world.

(Dollars in thousands) FY 2007 Budget FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Baseline Title IX Supplemental Total

Budget Baseline 140.0 140.0MV-22 Block B Conversion Kits and Installs 54.6 54.6V-22 Troop Commander Station 3.5 3.5

FY07 includes Supplemental funding for the following items:

V-22 Troop Commander Station: Funding provides V-22 Troop Commander Stations for 44 MV-22 aircraft. Thismodification will allow for enhanced situational awareness for the Troop Commander while in the combatzone and an expedient means for obtaining visual moving map data for squadrons deployed insupport of GWOT.

The current procurement objective is 458: 360 MV-22 Marine Corps aircraft, 48 HV-22 Navy aircraft, and 50CV-22 aircraft for USSOCOM.

Type Modifications: Safety, Reliability, Increased Service Life, Improved Mission Capabilities






#######

MODIFICATION TITLE: MV-22 CORRECTION OF DEFIENCIES AND PRE BLOCK A THROUGH C( OSIP 022-01 )

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: TYPE MODIFICATION: Safety, Reliability, Increased Service Life, Improved Mission Capabilities



RDT&E

PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION KITS

Addl Force & Drive Rate Output for TCL

Block A to B (9 A/C) (LOT 5, 41-49)

Block B #1

Block B #2

Block C (120 A/C)

Cargo Hook Door Actuator

Clam Shell Doors (16)

Climb Dive Valve

Defensive Weapon System

ECP 471 Life Rafts ECP 478 SDC DUCT LEAK SWITCH SET POINT

ECP 479 SUCTION LIFT PUMP

ECP 493 Wheel & Brake

ECP-V-22-0348 Interface Units

Troop Seats

Upper Crew Door

V-22 Troop Commander Station 44 3.5 44 3.5

Wing Stow System


INSTALL EQUIPMENT


ECO

DATA

TRAINING EQUIP

SUPPORT EQUIP

ILS

OTHER SUPPORT


INSTALLATION COST


sterisk (*) indicates amount value less than $51K

TOTALFY 2013 TO COMPLETEFY 2011

V-22 Series

FY 2012FY 2008 FY 2009PRIOR YEARS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2010

DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: ECP-###: V-22 for Troop Commander Station: Provides Troop Commander Station for 44 MV-22 aircraft. Thismodification will allow for enhanced situational awareness for the Troop Commander while in the combat zoneand an expedient means for obtaining visual moving map data for squadrons deployed in support of GWOT.


The MV-22 aircraft are currently in Low Rate Production. First acceptance and incorporation has been in production aircraft. All Awarded Kit deliveries and Installations are on schedule.



(Exhibit P-3a)



P-40APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total

QUANTITY

COST (In Millions) 40.5 40.5

MISSION DESCRIPTION:

$19.000 : The Shared Reconnaissance Pod (SHARP) collects and records high resolution visible and infrared imagery which can bedata-linked to both ground and afloat units. SHARP products include locational data that improves force protection due to the abilityto locate, surprise, engage and defeat hostile forces. These funds will buy the associated spares for 9 SHARP Pods.

$10.300 : The MV-22 is the Marine Corps' replacement of the legacy CH-46E and CH53D aircraft which currently supports the Marine Air GroundTask Force (MAGTF) conducting Expeditionary Operations. The legacy aircraft have approached and surpassed an average age of 40 years oldThe CH-46E fleet is currently deployed in support of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) and is flying in excess of the approved utilization rate.These funds will ensure sufficient availability of initial spares and account for the likely increased OPTEMPOs which have been experienced in theaterin 2007 due to lack of sufficient sparing levels.

$11.248: Support Facilities initial spares funds the procurement of new maintenance capability to repair new systems on AC as well as repair old maintenance capability for legacy systems.

($ in millions)FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total

INITIAL SPARES 40.5 40.5VENDOR DIRECT SPARESTOTAL BA-6

February 2007

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,NAVY/BA 6 060500, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS - Supplemental

DD Form 2454, Jun 86

P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 55Page 1 of 2


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit P-18($000)

Item QTY Cost Value % QTY Cost Value % QTY Cost Value % QTY Cost Value %

F/A-18E/F 19,000

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 1 $71,000 10,300 14.51%

Support Facilities 11,216

Total Initial Spares 40,516

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009End Item Init. Spares End Item Init. Spares

% = Initial Spares Value/End Item Cost

End Item Init. Spares End Item Init. Spares

P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 55Page 1 of 2



P-40 February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 70500 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT

Aircraft Procurement, Navy/Budget Activity 7 Common Ground Equipment (47C2)Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior ID ToYears Code FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

QUANTITYCOST(In Millions) A 2.800 $38.8

P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 ITEM NO. 56 PAGE NO. 1

UNCLASSIFIED


(Dollars in Thousands) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 414.018 1.400 2.8 418.218


JETSCAN will increase the availability of EA6Bs, reduce the maintenance cost per hour, and enhance engine flight safety. J-52 engine maintenance requires frequent sampling and analysis of engine oil to ensure safety of flight. Prompt and accurate diagnostics are used to identify and remove engines with potential catastrophic failures. Current methods of oil analysis are spread out across facilities causing a delay in results and subsequent removal of engines until results are received. This preventative removal is costly in maintenance time and operational availability.

CLASSIFICATION:

BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET FOR AGGREGATED ITEMS DATE:February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREAircraft Procurement, Navy 070500 Common Ground Equipment (47C2)

ID Prior ToProcurement Items Code Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

JETSCAN Quantity 10 10 Cost 2.800 2.800

TOTAL 2.800 2.800

P-1 SHOPPING LIST 56 CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86 PAGE NO. 2

UNCLASSIFIED


BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007


Weapons Procurement, Navy BA 2 - Other Missiles 223000, Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW)Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsCode B- P.E. 0204162N 0604727N

Prior Years ID Code FY 2006

FY 2007 Supp FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Program

Quantity A 30Cost ($M) 8.0Initial Spares ($M) 0.0Total ($M) 8.0Unit Cost ($M) 0.3

Reason funds are required: The purpose of this supplemental is to procure additional JSOW-C weapons to reconstitute JSOW-A weapons expended in Operation Iraqi Freedom. To achieve the unit cost/quantity in this supplemental request, funds must be combined with the FY07 annual procurement.

Narrative Description: Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) is a joint USN/USAF program with the USN as the lead service. The JSOW program provides an air-to-ground glide weapon (AGM-154) capable of attacking a variety of targets during day, night, and adverse weather conditions for use against fixed area targets. The JSOW will enhance aircraft survivability as compared to current interdiction weapon systems by providing the capability for launch aircraft to standoff outside the range of most target area surface-to-air threat systems. The JSOW Global Positioning System (GPS)/Inertial Navigation System (INS) capability will allow several target kills per aircraft sortie.

The JSOW Baseline variant (AGM-154A) has been integrated on USN (F/A-18C/D/E/F) and USAF (F-16C/D, B-2 and B-52) aircraft, with a Joint (A/F, USN) planned inventory of 3,323 units. USN will procure an inventory of 2,800 All-Up-Rounds (AURs) for integration on F/A-18 aircraft and the USAF have procured an inventory of 523 AURs for integration on F-16C/D, F-15E, B-1B, B-52, and B-2 aircraft. The JSOW BLU-108 (AGM-154B) variant provides an anti-armor/tank capability. Production of the AGM-154B variant has been deferred. The JSOW Unitary variant (AGM-154C) utilizes the common airframe of the AGM-154A and B variants and incorporates an infrared uncooled seeker with Autonomous Targeting Acquisition. The payload includes a 500 pound class Broach multi-stage warhead. AGM-154C was approved for Low Rate Initial Production on 26 June 2003. Full Rate Production of the AGM-154C began in December 2004. The Navy's planned inventory is 7,000 JSOW AGM-154C AURs.

Production in the FYDP is focused on JSOW-C because of the low inventory and high demand for this weapon. JSOW-A production is temporarily deferred for two reasons: Raytheon ongoing development of an Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) solution to the BLU-97 and the department's direction to accept risk in weapon quantity for area attack munitions. The anticipated UXO solution will involve the incorporation of a BLU-111 warhead into the JSOW-A weapon (AGM-154A-1). Production of the AGM-154A-1 variant was awarded in March 2006 in support of Turkey FMS requirements. A moving/relocatable target capability is under development and planned to be incorporated in JSOW-C production units beginning in FY09. (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $124,051 $0 $8,000 $132,051

Columns may not add due to roundingDD Form 2454, Jun 86

P-1 Line Item No 7(page 1 of 4)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification

(Exhibit P-40, page 1 of 4)

CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIED

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT NAVYMISSILE COST ANALYSIS

EXHIBIT P-5(Dollars in Millions)

BLI - Nomenclature Popular Name: 223000, JSOW AGM-154 Date: February 2007

Prior Years FY 2006 Quantity FY 2007 Quantity 255 FY 2008 Quantity FY 2009 QuantityCost Elements Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

HARDWARE - MISSILEALL UP ROUND (AUR) 30 0.246 7.380CONTRACTOR (WARRANTY / ECO / DATA) 0.341LRIP-2 ACCELERATIONTOTAL HARDWARE - MISSILE 30 0.257 7.721

PROCUREMENT SUPPORT - MISSILECOMMAND & LAUNCH / ST&E / MISSION / SWCONTAINERS 0.279GIH PRODUCTION SUPPORTJMPS INTEGRATIONLC GEU / CONTROLSPECIAL TOOLING & TEST EQUIPMENT (ST & TTELEMETRYTOTAL PROCUREMENT SUPPORT - MISSILE 0.279

FLEET SUPPORT-MISSILEINTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT (ILS)TOTAL FLEET SUPPORT-MISSILE

Weapon System Cost 30 0.267 8.000

ModificationsInitial Spares

Total Program Cost 8.000


P-1 Line Item No 7(page 2 of 4)

Exhibit P-5, Cost Analysis(Exhibit P-5, page 2 of 4)



BUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System A. DATE JSOW February 2007

B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD

Weapons Procurement, Navy BA 2 - Other Missiles 223000, JSOW J2JS

Cost Element/FiscalYear Qty

Unit Cost (M)

Location of PCO

RFP Issue Date

Contract Method &

Type Contractor and Location Award Date

Date of First

Delivery

Specs Available

Now

Date Revisions Available

FY 2007 30 0.246 NAVAIR 04/2006 SS-FFPRAYTHEON MISSILE SYSTEMS COMPANY, TUCSON, AZ 02/2007 03/2008 Yes N/A

Remarks: Unit Cost reflects All-Up Round Hardware.

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87P-1 Line Item No 7

(page 3 of 4)Exhibit P-5a, Procurement History and Planning

(Exhibit P-5A, page 3 of 4)

FY 08/09 BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE BLI 223000WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-2 JSOW JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON (JSOW)

Production Rate Procurement LeadtimesManufacturer's All Variants ALT Prior ALT After Initial Reorder Unit of

Item Name and Location MSR 2-8-5 MAX* to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total MeasureJoint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) Raytheon Company 5 15 13 18

Tucson, AZ

AGM-154A, AGM-154C

FISCAL YEAR 2006 FISCAL YEAR 2007

ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B CALENDAR YEAR 2006 CALENDAR YEAR 2007Y V

CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

JSOW-C/Raytheon Systems - 2007 N 30 0 30 A 30Supplemental


ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B 2007 CALENDAR YEAR 2008 CALENDAR YEAR 2009Y V

CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

JSOW-C/Raytheon Systems - 2007 N 30 0 30 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 0Supplemental

Remarks:

DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete P-1 SHOPPING LIST

311 / 244

February 2007

240 720 1416 E

* Maximum rate assumes a 3-8-7 shift with existing tooling.

P-1 Line Item No. 7(page 4 of 4)

Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule(Exhibit P-21, page 4 of 4)


BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007

P-40APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREWeapons Procurement, Navy BA 2 - Other Missiles 225400, HELLFIREProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior Years

ID Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

To Complete Total Program

Quantity 0 0Cost ($M) 0.4 0.4Initial Spares ($M) 0.0 0.0Total ($M) 0.4 0.4Unit Cost($M) 0.0 0.0

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

$100.0 $0.4 $100.4


AGM-114 Hellfire is a laser guided missile primarily employed against point targets by rotary wing AH-1 and H-60 aircraft. There are two types of warheads: shaped charge (AGM-114 B/K) and blast fragmentation (AGM-114 M/N). Blast fragmentation variants are capable against soft targets, making it the rotary wing “weapon of choice” in the GWOT. The AGM-114N is a Thermobaric blast fragmentation warhead that maintains the capability provided by the AGM-114M while adding a unique capability against confined compartmented spaces, a typical target type observed in current combat operations. Because of the AH-1/H-60 Armed Helo Requirements, this weapon is essential to Sea Shield and Sea Strike. Training equipment includes a mix of inert and training guided missiles

Impact if not funded: $0.4M of the requested FY07 supplemental funding will provide for the modification of approximately 7 existing assets, which are approaching the end of their shelf-life, to an inert warhead configuration. These assets are required to support critical training for combat aircrews preceeding deployments to various theaters of operation.


ITEM 10(page 1 of 2)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification



WEAPONS PROCUREMENT NAVYMISSILE COST ANALYSIS

EXHIBIT P-5(Dollars in Millions)

Exhibit P-5 Cost AnalysisHELLFIRE


Prior Years

Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Cost

0.400 0.4000.400 0.400

0.400 0.400

0.400 0.400

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY/ BA-2

ID Code

Dollars in Millions225400, HELLFIRE

TotalFY 2009FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

February 2007DATE:

P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Weapon System

Element of Cost

HARDWARE - MISSILEALL UP ROUND (AUR)TOTAL HARDWARE - MISSILE

PROCUREMENT SUPPORT - MISSILEENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICESGOVT IN-HOUSE SYSTEM ENGINEERINGTOTAL PROCUREMENT SUPPORT - MISSILE

Total Flyaway Cost

FLEET SUPPORT-MISSILEINTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT (ILS)TRAINING EQUIPMENTTOTAL FLEET SUPPORT-MISSILE

OTHER MISSILE COSTSCONTAINERSTOTAL OTHER MISSILE COSTS

Weapon System Cost

ModificationsInitial Spares

Total

ITEM NO 10(page 2 of 2)




P-40 February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/LINE ITEM #WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS - BLI #412900BA-4: OTHER WEAPONS 74E3 Program Element for Code B Items: OTHER RELATED PROGRM ELEMENTS


QUANTITY 0EQUIPMENT COST(In Millions) N/A $0.0 $72.1 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $72.1SPARES COST(In Millions) 0PROGRAM DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:

CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86

UNCLASSIFIED

Quantities of weapons procured with the above funding are to meet small arms allowances and inventory objectives. This line item provides for initialissue procurement, modernization, standardization and stock replenishment procurement of a wide variety of small arms and weapons (caliber .50 andbelow), including required gun mounts and associated support components. This line also provides for procurement of sufficient types and quantities ofweapons to support training, security afloat and shore missions of approximately 2,495 ship/ashore activities Navy-wide. This line item procures armsand weapons and other related equipment for the Naval Mobile Construction Battalions, Naval Coastal Warfare, Explosive Ordinance DisposalDetachments, Naval Expeditionary Logistics Support Groups, and other Naval Expeditionary Combat Command Units.

Requested funds are required to arm newly formed units, provide for pre-deployment training, and replace weapons of units under the NavalExpeditionary Combat Command.

Quantities of weapons procured with the requested funding are to replace unserviceable small arms which are beyond economical repair (M2HB .50 Calmachine guns, MK19-3 40mm grenade machine guns, M203 40mm grenade launchers, MK11 7.62MM sniper rifles, SOPMOD M4A1 carbines, 7.62 MMM240 machine guns, XM107 .50 Cal sniper rifles, P226 9MM pistols, etc.), as a result of Operation Iraqi Freedom. FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $12,457 $0 $72,113 $84,570

Item No. 26(Page 1 of 3) Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification


CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified WEAPON SYSTEM COST ANALYSIS EXHIBIT (P-5) DATE:

February 2007APPROPRIATION: WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE: BA-4: OTHER WEAPONS SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS BLI# 412900Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements SUBHEAD 74E3

Cost FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

Code ELEMENT OF COST QTY TOT COST (000) QTYUNIT COST

(000)TOT COST

(000) QTYTOT COST

(000) QTYTOT COST

(000)

SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONSE3001 M16A3 5.56MM RIFLE 1.3 13,520

MOSS 500A1 12GA SHOTGUN 191 0.4 76 MK-19 MOD 3 40MM GMG 275 17.4 4,778 M2HB .50 CAL MG 1,080 18.7 20,187 M240 7.62MM MG 630 8.5 5,365 MK44 7.62MM MINIGUN 64 70.3 4,499 MK14 ENHANCED BATTLE RIFLE 20 2.4 48 M9 9MM PISTOL 1,546 0.8 1,237 M203 40MM GL 543 1.3 706 MK727/M4 5.56MM CARBINE 1.2 19,206 MK11, 7.62MM SNIPER RIFLE 20 9.3 186 P226, 9MM PISTOL 100 0.7 70 XM107, .50 CAL SNIPER RIFLE 6 13.0 78 TRI-POD MACHINE GUN M122 350 0.85 298 MK93 WEAPONS MOUNT MK19 & M2 .50 CAL 441 3.2 1,411 M3 TRI-POD FOR MK-19 & M2 .50 CAL 287 1.0 287 CLOSE QUARTER BATTLE RIFLE 10" UPPER 80 1.8 160

TOTAL SHIP ESTIMATE 72,113 0 0

NET P-1 LINE ITEM 72,113 0 0

CLASSIFICATION:Unclassified

10,401

16,005

Columns may not add due to rounding.Item No. 26

(Page 2 of 3)Exhibit P-5, Cost Analysis(Exhibit P-5, page 2 of 3)

COST ELEMENT Quantity UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE CONTRACT CONTRACTOR AWARD DATE OF SPEC DATE

FISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE METHOD AND LOCATION DATE FIRST AVAILABLE REVISIONS

(000) & TYPE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

FY 2007E3001

P226, 9MM PISTOL 100 0.7 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 FFP SIG ARMS EXETER, NH MAY-07 FEB-08

M16A3 5.56MM RIFLE 10,401 1.3 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 TBD N. HAVEN, CT JUN-07 FEB-08

MK11 7.62MM SNIPER RIFLE 20 9.3 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 TBD KNIGHT, ORLANDO, FL JUN-07 FEB-08

M203 40MM GL 543 1.3 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 TBD COLT ARMS, N. HAVEN CT AUG-07 JUN-08

M240 7.62MM MG 630 8.5 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 IDIQ FNMI COLUMBIA, SC JUN-07 MAR-08

M2HB .50 CAL MG 1,080 18.7 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 FFP GD BURLINGTON, VT MAY-07 DEC-08

M9 9MM PISTOL 1,546 0.8 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 FFP BERETTA FIREARMS, MAN, TN JUN-07 MAR-08

MK44 7.62MM MINIGUN 64 70.3 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 FFP DILLON, PHOENIX, AZ MAY-07 DEC-07

MK14 ENHANCED BATTLE RIFLE 20 2.4 NSWC, CRANE N/A WX NSWC, CRANE APR-07 OCT-07

XM107, .50 CAL SNIPER RIFLE 6 13.0 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 FFP BARRETT, MURFREESBORO, TN MAY-07 AUG-08

MK-19 MOD 3 40MM GMG 275 17.4 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 FFP GD BURLINGTON, VT JUN-07 JUN-08

MOSS 500A1 12GA SHOTGUN 191 0.4 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 FFP/IDIQ MOSSBERG, N. HAVEN, CT APR-07 NOV-07

M4A1, 5.56MM CARBINE 16,005 1.2 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL MAR-07 FFP COLT, NH SEP-07 OCT-08

TRI-POD M122 GROUND 350 0.85 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 IDIQ VARIOUS APR-07 APR-08

M3 WEAPONS MOUNT FOR MK-19 & M2.50 CAL 441 3.2 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 IDIQ VARIOUS APR-07 APR-08

M3 TRI-POD FOR MK-19 &M2. 50 CAL 287 1.0 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 IDIQ VARIOUS APR-07 APR-08

CLOSE QUARTER BATTLE RIFLE 10" UPPER 80 1.8 NSWC, CRANE MAR-07 FFP COLT, NH JUL-07 OCT-07


Exhibit P5A, PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Weapon System DATE

February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADWEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 4 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS 74E3

BLIN: 4129

Item No. 26(Page 3 of 3)

Exhibit P-5a, Procurement History and Planning(Exhibit P-5a, page 3 of 3)


P-40 February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREWeapons Procurement, Navy / BA-4: OTHER WEAPONS BLI: 4217 GUN MOUNT MODS A4E5Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

2004 and ID To TotalPrior Years Code FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Complete Program

QUANTITY COST ($M) $72.0

(Dollars in thousands)FY 2007BASELINE FY2007 FY2007 FY2007BUDGET TITLE IX SUPPLEMENTAL TOTAL$19,956* $0 $72,000 $91,956

*$5.1M of the FY07 baseline budget funds the MK 38 Mod 2 Gun.

P1 SHOPPING ITEM NO. 29 CLASSIFICATION:

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 PAGE NO 1

UNCLASSIFIED

Item Description/Justification:

E5006 - MK 38 MOD 2 GUN: This element procures MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mounts. The MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mount is a 25mm minor caliber chain gun with stabilization, remote operation and an on-mount Electro-Optical Fire Control System (EOFCS) for both day and night surveillance/engagement. The MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mount is designed to engage small boat threats posed by adversariesand terrorist organizations (e.g. USS COLE incident) at close-range to ships in port, at anchor, or while transiting choke points or operating in restricted waters. Supplemental Funds will procureand install sixty (60) MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mounts ,on-board repair parts kits and special tools kits. The Supplemental Funds accelerates the response of the USN to the Global War on Terrorism.Without this supplemental, the MK 38 Mod 2 Gun Mounts procurement and installation will be delayed until FY10.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDWEAPONS SYSTEM COST ANALYSIS Weapon System DATE:

P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD Weapons Procurement, Navy/BA-4

GUN MOUNT MODS/4217 A4E5

COST ELEMENT OF COST ID FY2004 AND FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007CODE Code PRIOR

Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

E5006 MK 38 MOD 2 Gun 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 1,200 72,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 60 1,200 72,000DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 29 CLASSIFICATION:

PAGE NO 2

UNCLASSIFIED



Weapons Procurement, Navy/BA-4 GUN MOUNT MODS/4217 A4E5

CONTRACT DATE OF SPECS DATE

Cost Element/ QUANTITY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST AVAILABLE REVISIONS

FISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

(000)

MK 38 Gun

FY2007 60 1,200 NSWC PHD N/A Existing IDIQ FFP BAE, Louisville KY Apr-07 Oct-07 N/A N/A

D. REMARKS

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO. 29 Classification:PAGE NO 3 UNCLASSIFIED

February 2007

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3A INDIVIDUAL MODIFICATION

MODELS OF SYSTEM AFFECTED: MK 38 MOD 2 TYPE MODIFICATION: WPNS PROCUREMENT MODIFICATION TITLE: STABILIZED GUN SYS PROCURE



FY 2004 ANDPRIOR FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 TC TOTAL

QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $ QTY $FINANCIAL PLAN (IN MILLIONS)

RDT&EPROCUREMENT INSTALLATION KITS 60 36.41 INSTALLATION KITS - UNIT COST 0.61 INSTALLATION KITS NONRECURRING EQUIPMENT 0.54 EQUIPMENT NONRECURRING ENGINEERING CHANGE ORDERS 3.53 DATA TRAINING EQUIPMENT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PRODUCTION SUPPORT 4.14 OTHER (ILS/TEST SUPPORT) 8.13 OTHER (CSS) INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORT INSTALL COST 60 19.24 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 0.00 0.00 72.00

P1 SHOPPING ITEM NO.29 PAGE 4 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Procure stabilized, remote control kits for MK 38 MOD 2 Machine Gun Systems for installation on Surface Combatant/Amphibs to meet new Force Protection/Antiterrorism requirements.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3A (Continued) INDIVIDUAL MODIFICATION (Continued)

MODELS OF SYSTEMS AFFECTED: MK 38 MOD 2 MODIFICATION TITLE: STABILIZED GUN SYS PROCUREMENT

INSTALLATION INFORMATION: ALTERATION INSTALLATION TEAM (AIT)METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION:ADMINISTRATIVE LEADTIME: PRODUCTION LEADTIME:CONTRACT DATES: FY 2005: N/A FY2006 N/A FY2007 N/ADELIVERY DATE: FY2005 N/A FY2006 N/A FY2007 N/A

($ in Millions)Cost: FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty $ Qty Qty $ Qty $ Qty $

PRIOR YEARS 0 0.00 0.00 FY 2005 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 FY 2006 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 FY 2007 EQUIPMENT 60 36.41 60 36.41 FY 2008 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 FY 2009 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 FY 2010 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 FY 2011 EQUIPMENT 0 0 0.00 TO COMPLETE 0 0.00 0 0.00

60

INSTALLATION SCHEDULE:FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 TC

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 TOTALIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 16 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60

P-3AP1 SHOPPING ITEM NO. 29 PAGE NO. 5 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

FY04 and Prior FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 To Complete Total $ Qty $ Qty

0

FY2004 AND PRIOR FY 2011

0

Date:

Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification SheetAppropriation / Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Item Nomenclature:

Program Elements: Code: Other Related Program Elements:

0305204N BFY 2007

SupplementalQuantityNet P-1 Cost ($M) 19.300$

Advanced Proc ($M)

Wpn Sys Cost ($M) 19.300$

Initial Spares ($M)

Proc Cost ($M) 19.300$

Unit Cost ($M)

Weapons Procurement, Navy/ B.A. 4 422700, Marine Corps Tactical Unmanned Aerial System (MCTUAS)

February 2007

Narrative Description

The Marine Corps Tactical Unmanned Aerial System (MCTUAS) provides dedicated Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (RSTA), Intelligence, Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) and Force Protection. The MCTUAS provides critical battlefield intelligence and targeting information in the rapid cycle time required for success at the tactical level. MCTUAS consists of four air vehicles, (each configured with an EO/IR sensor payload), launcher and ground control and support equipment including: power generation, communications equipment, automated recovery equipment, remote video terminals, vehicle mounted shelters, and High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles with trailer(s). Each system is equipped with one Maintenance Section Multifunctional Vehicle and is supported by a Mobile Maintenance facility. These systems will be procured through the Army on their Shadow TUAS production contract. The Marine Corps configuration will match the Army's to ensure combat units have maximum interoperability, maintainability, and combat effectiveness.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget* Title IX Supplemental Total $ 19.300 $ 19.300

Reason funds are required: FY07 fully funds one MCTUAS system and associated support.

Note: A request to reprogram $16.428M from Pioneer LI 4222 WPN P-1 #30 to MCTUAS LI 4227 is being submitted to Congress.

BLI No. 422700 Item No. Page 1 of 4

Exhibit P-40,Budget Item Justification Sheet



Exhibit P-5 Cost Analysis Weapon System DATE:MCTUAS February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREWEAPONS PROCUREMENT,NAVY/BA 4 B 422700, Marine Corps Tactical Unmanned Aerial System (MCTUAS)

Cost Element of CostQTY: Unit Cost Total Cost QTY: Unit Cost Total Cost QTY: Unit Cost Total Cost QTY: Unit Cost Total Cost

AIR VEHICLE SYSTEM 1 6.958 6.958CFE MISSION ELECGFE ELECTRONICSENGINES/ACCESSARMAMENTOTHER GFE 3.420REC FLYAWAY ECO 0.403REC FLYAWAY COST 10.781

NON-RECURRINGANCILLARY EQUIP 3.189

TOTAL FLYAWAY 13.970

AIRFRAME PGSEENGINE PGSEAVIONICS PGSEPEC TRNG EQ/PTS 0.200PUBS / TECH DATA 0.171PROD ENG SUPT 2.298OTHER ILS 2.661

TOTAL SUPPORT COST 5.330

GROSS P-1 COST 19.300ADV PROC CREDITNET P-1 COST 19.300 .ADV PROCUREMENTWEAPON SYS COST 19.300INITIAL SPARES

28 PROCUREMENT COST 19.300

FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

Dollars in Millions

FY 2006

DD FORM 2446, JUN 86Totals may not add due to rounding P-1 Shopping List Item No Page 2 of 4




MCTUAS February 2007B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD

Weapons Procurement, Navy/ B.A. 4 422700, Marine Corps Tactical UAS (MCTUAS) XXXX

CONTRACT DATE OF TECH DATECost Element/ QUANTITY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST DATA REVISIONSFISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY AVAILABLE AVAILABLE

($M) NOW?FY07Air Vehicle System 1 6.958 AMCOM Mar-07 SS/FPIF AAI Jul 07 Jul 08 Yes N/A

Huntsville, AL Hunt Valley, MD

D. REMARKS

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST ITEM NO.

Exhibit P-5a, Procurement History and Planning(Exhibit P-5a, page 3 of 4)



BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREWeapons Procurement, Navy/ B.A. 4 MCTUAS 422700, Marine Corps Tactical UAS (MCTUAS)

Production Rate Procurement LeadtimesManufacturer's ALT Prior ALT After Initial Reorder Unit of

Item Name and Location MSR ECON MAX to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total MeasureMCTUAS Air Vehicle System AAI, Hunt Valley, MD 1 10 12 4 9 12 12 21 E


ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B 2005 CALENDAR YEAR 2006 2006 CALENDAR YEAR 2007Y V

CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

Air Vehicle System - AAI FY07 N 1 0 1 A 1



CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

Air Vehicle System - AAI FY07 N 1 0 1 1 0

Remarks:


311 / 244 ITEM NO.

(Page 4 of 4)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-21, Production Schedule


Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost 0.970

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.970

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE SUBHEAD NO. 81GA BLIN: 0110

February 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 7,411 970 8,381

Narrative DescriptionProcurement of Main Propulsion engines and components (LM-2500 - P/U GA015) to increase reliabiliy and reduce maintenance. The program is replacing existing on engine fuel controls with off engine digital fuel controls that address obsolescence and reliability.

Reason funds are requiredAccelerating 1 unit (1 shipset) will allow program to install 1 additional shipset during cruiser conversion, and this is long lead time (36 week) material. Note a discount is also obtained if ordered in advance.

Item No. 1 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit P-40,Budget Item Justification Sheet

ID Code

COST IDCODE Code Prior

YearsTotal Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

EQUIPMENT

GA015 LM2500 GAS TURBINE

DIGITAL FUEL CONTROL A 1 970 970

TOTAL EQUIPMENT 970

970TOTAL

SUBHEAD NO. 81GA

ELEMENT OF COST

TOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE


EXHIBIT P-5 COST ANALYSIS Weapon System DATEFeb-07

Item No. 1 Page 2 of 3 P-5



& TYPE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

FY 2007

GA015 LM2500 GAS TURBINE

DIGITAL FUEL CONTROL 1 970 NSWC PHILA, PA WX GE CINCINNATI, OHIO MAR-07 JAN-08 YES

BLIN: 0110

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE 81GA


Exhibit P5A, PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Weapon System DATEFebruary-07

Item No. 1 Page 3 of 3 P-5a

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 4.0

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 4.0

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE SUBHEAD NO. 81GF BLIN: 0120

February 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 16,117 4,000 20,117

Narrative DescriptionProcurement of Gas Turbine Generator components (ALLISON - P/U GF015) and controls to increase reliability and reduce maintenance. The program is replacing existing analog outdated control system with digital control system that adresses obsolescence and reliability.

Reason funds are requiredAccelerating the final 10 units (currently in FY 2008) to FY 2007 will allow the remaining 3 ships (3/ship) to be installed in FY 2008. Lead time is 40 weeks on these units (Note: One extra unit is battle spare).

Item No. 2 Page 1 of 3Exhibit P-40,

Budget Item Justification Sheet

ID Code



EQUIPMENT

GF015 FULL AUTHORITY DIGITAL CONTROL 10 400 4,000

TOTAL EQUIPMENT 4,000

10 400 4,000TOTAL

SUBHEAD NO. 81GF

ELEMENT OF COST


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE


EXHIBIT P-5 COST ANALYSIS Weapon System DATEFebruary-07




& TYPE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

FY 2007

GF015

FULL AUTHORITY DIGITAL CONTROL 10 400 NSWC, PHILA WX ROLLS ROYCE ALLISON MAR-07 SEP-07 YES

BLIN: 0120

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE 81GF


Exhibit P5A, PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Weapon System DATEFebruary-07

Item No. 2 Page 3 of 3 P-5a

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.436

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1

February 2007

CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS/SUBHEAD NO. 81CW BLIN: 0989

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 3,128 436 3,564 Narrative DescriptionThe Riverine force is made up of a command element of 45 personnel and 3 Squadrons with 224 personnel. Each squadron has 19 Officers and 205 Enlisted. Funding will be used to procure Chemical and Biological Defense Equipment (i.e. individual protection equipment kit [suits, masks, gloves etc...at your standard 224% level], chemical detectors, portable decom and systems protective shelters).

Reason funds are requiredChemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (CBRND) equipment increases force protection by providing Navy personnel the ability to perform their missions in the event of CBRN warfare agent attack. Funds are required for the initial outfitting of sailors and to ensure each deploying sailor is provided with proper chemical detectors and a serviceable, properly fitted CBRD ensemble (protective masks, chemical protection over-garment and boots).


ID Code



EQUIPMENT

CW001 RIVERINE 0 0 436

TOTAL EQUIPMENT 436

436TOTAL

Note: Joint Chemical Biological Defense Program funds the procurement of equipment.

SUBHEAD NO. 81CW

ELEMENT OF COST


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 1 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS


EXHIBIT P-5 COST ANALYSIS Weapon System DATE February 2007


Date:



$MillionsFY 2007

SupplementalProc Qty 67Gross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1)

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY BA-1: SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT STANDARD BOATS/11H0 BLI: 1210

February 2007



$49,382 $ 35,614 $84,996

Reason funds are required: To provide small boats for Naval Coastal Warfare including Mobile Diving Salvage Units for replacement boats for Underwater Construction Teams, riverine requirements to ready the next Riverine Group for deployment and replacement harbor security boats for operations in FOLs Jebel Ali and Fujairah to protect visiting ships directly supporting the GWOT.

BLI No. 1210 Item No. 24 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit P-40,



P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD Other Procurement, Navy STANDARD BOATS/11H0 BLI: 1210$Millions

COST ELEMENT OF COST ID Prior FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009CODE Code Years

Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total CostTotal Cost

SPONSOR - N4 (CNI Port Ops)H0040 FORCE PROTECTION (small) 11 208 2,288H0830 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 106H0900 CONSULTING SERVICES 106

SUBTOTAL 11 2,500

SPONSOR - N4 (CNI Port Ops) -- MDSUH0028 7m RIGID INFLATABLE BOAT (RIB) 2 160 320H0830 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 30H0900 CONSULTING SERVICES 14

SUBTOTAL 2 364

SPONSOR - N851 (Riverine)H0049 RIVERINE MULT-MISSION CRAFT 4 1,100 4,400H0051 RIVERINE COMMAND & CONTROL CRAFT 8 1,000 8,000H0830 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 400H0900 CONSULTING SERVICES 200

SUBTOTAL 12 13,000

SPONSOR - N857 (NCW) -- NAVFAC requestH0028 7m RIGID INFLATABLE BOAT (RIB) 4 160 640H0040 FORCE PROTECTION (small) 10 208 2,080H0042 FORCE PROTECTION (large) 24 654 15,696H0830 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 168H0900 CONSULTING SERVICES 166

SUBTOTAL 38 18,750

SPONSOR - N857 (UCT) -- NAVFAC requestH0028 7m RIGID INFLATABLE BOAT (RIB) 4 160 640H0830 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 180H0900 CONSULTING SERVICES 180

SUBTOTAL 4 1,000

TOTAL 67 35,614DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:

24 PAGE NO. 2

UNCLASSIFIED


February 2007B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOther Procurement, Navy STANDARD BOATS 11H0$Millions

CONTRACT DATE OF SPECS IF NOCost Element/ QTY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST AVAILABLE WHENFISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

(000)

FY07H0028 7M (24FT) RIB (MDSU) 2 160 NAVSEA GSA Willard Apr 07 Aug 07H0028 7M (24FT) RIB (NCW) 4 160 NAVSEA GSA Willard Apr 07 Aug 07H0028 7M (24FT) RIB (UCT) 4 160 NAVSEA GSA Zodiac Apr 07 Aug 07H0040 FP (small) 21 208 NAVSEA GSA TBD May 07 Dec 07H0042 FP (large) 24 654 NAVSEA GSA SeaArk Jun 07 Feb 08H0049 Riverine Multi-Mission 4 1,100 NAVSEA GSA USMI May 07 Jan 08H0059 Riverine Command & Control 8 1,000 NAVSEA GSA Safeboat Jun07 May 08

67

D. REMARKS DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:

ITEM NO. 24 PAGE NO. 3 UNCLASSIFIED

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $5.850

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost $5.850

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT Tactical Support Center

February 2007

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $5,217 $5,850 $11,067 Reason funds are required: Maritime Patrol & Reconnaissance Force (MPRF) Mission Support Systems (formerly Tactical/Mobile (TacMobile) Systems).: MPRF Mission Support Systems provide the Maritime Sector Commanders (Ashore) with the capability to plan, direct, control and evaluate the tactical operations of MPRF and other assigned units within their respective area of responsibility. These operations include littoral, open ocean, and over land all sensor (i.e. Electro Optical (EO), Infrared (IR), Inverse Synthetic-Aperture Radar (ISAR), etc.) surveillance, anti-surface warfare, over-the-horizon targeting, counter-drug operations, power projection, antisubmarine warfare, mining, search and rescue, homeland defense, and special operations. The program includes fixed-site Tactical Support Centers (TSCs) or equivalent and Mobile Operations Control Centers (MOCCs) or equivalent. Each TacMobile unit is a system-of-systems. TSCs provide sensor and tactical data communications systems; mission planning/mission support, sensor analysis capabilities; avionics and weapons system interfaces, media devices and data handling capabilities, at fixed-site locations. MOCC is a scalable and mobile version of the TSC for contingency operations and for support of operations from expeditionary airfields that do not have a TSC. The TacMobile program uses an evolutionary development strategy consisting of incremental upgrades to meet new and emergent Fleet requirements, while retaining current capabilities. Increments are planned and resourced to support the new P-8A Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA) and new and updated sensors on the P-3C series aircraft. WH046. Analysis Interface Equipment. This cost code contains TSC sensor analysis, mission planning, and in-flight mission support capabilities, avionics and weapons system interfaces, computer upgrades and associated software for interfacing, analysis and processing equipment to the supported weapons systems (aircraft). It also includes Mobility and Facilities Equipment necessary to power and support the processing equipment and interfaces.

GWOT: 1) Eight Tactical Common Data Link (TCDL) units require replacement due to excessive wear and tear associated with the desert conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan. These units provide real time imagery from surveillance aircraft to Commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan; 2) Additional funds are also required for Imagery workstations - 1 MOCC Maritime Patrol & Reconnaissance Force (MPRF) operational mission support - Increased Imagery Capability- Per CTF-57 classified message DTG 151020Z SEP06, one site needs Imagery Workstations with ICE capability.


UNCLASSIFIEDCLASSIFICATION

COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY SUBHEADOP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT Tactical Support Center 52WH

PY FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009COST ID TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTALCODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COSTWH046 TCDL STE EQUIP A 8 700 5,600WH777 NON-FMP INSTALLATION A 200

WH046 Imagery Workstations A 1 35 35WH777 NON-FMP INSTALLATION A 15

TOTAL CONTROL 5,850

DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 Unclassified Exhibit P-5, Budget Item Justification

P-1 Shopping List-Item No - 40 2 of 2

February 2007

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $45.750

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost* $45.750

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 2360 SHIPBOARD INFORMATION WELFARE (IW) EXPLOIT

February 2007

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $73,192 $45,750 $118,942

$23.750M Unclassified$22M Classified

Reason funds are required: Funding is required to produce actionable intelligence from massive (and ever-increasing) datasets, in near-real time. The Navy has developed a data mining capability to solve the data analysis problem. These funds will install data mining software and pay for site licenses for OIF/OEF deploying naval units. Demonstrations of the prototype to afloat operators and other personnel from organizations have generated high interest; Navy COMINT systems need to keep pace with rapidly modernizing technologies by rapidly developing and fielding SIGINT capabilities to enable continued exploitation of terrorist communications targets. Funds procurement and installation of Navy COMINT System upgrades on six (6) ships deploying to support OIF/OEF in order to keep pace with terrorist communications systems capabilities; Navy has developed a classified capability to force suspected terrorists off of communications networks that have proven difficult to exploit, thereby making them employ methods more vulnerable to collection. Funds procurement and installation of ten (10) "black-box" systems on the next deploying Navy Carrier Strike Groups (CSGs) and Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESGs) in support of GWOT; The Navy’s Hostile forces Integrated Targeting Service (HITS) geo-locates OIF/OEF emitters. This supplemental funding is needed to deploy ten (10) additional HITS sensors to improve geo-location accuracy, availability, and timeliness. Precision geo-location sensors are currently low density, high demand assets, and increasing their numbers will improve OIF/OEF mission effectiveness with relatively modest investment and low risk. Geo-location data produced by HITS can be orders of magnitude more accurate than traditional direction finding (DF) systems. HITS is deployed on Navy Strike Groups, Navy EP-3E aircraft, and other Navy surface ship and airborne platforms; Upgrade to Navy fleet of AN/SRS-1 COMBAT DF (CDF) COMINT Collection suites. Funding is required to procure HF recognition tuners/ receivers and ancillary equipment necessary to process and recognize modern threat signals, which improves effectiveness against GWOT signals. Automatic Identification System (AIS) is an International Maritime Very High Frequency (VHF) Communication system that allows any ship to exchange information (machine to machine) on Navigation (Position, Course, Speed, etc), Ship Info (Ship Name, Call Sign, Length/Beam), Cargo Info (Draft, Type, Destination, Route, Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA)), and Messaging (Safety, Text). AIS "integrated" capability will provide large deck command ships supporting GWOT with the ability to rapidly identify and track commercial shipping vessels, which significantly increases the Navy's ability to distinguish between normal and suspicious merchant ships. This capability dramatically improves the combatant commanders' situational awareness of potential maritime terrorism threats.




COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY SUBHEADOP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 521U

PY FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009COST ID TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTALCODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST

1U013AN/SS1-137(V)1 & (V)2 - Data Mining Software VAR VAR 3,000

1U013AN/SS1-137(V)1 & (V)2 - COMINT Upgrades 6 VAR 3,500

1U013AN/SS1-137(V)1 & (V)2 - CSG/ESG Cryptologic Equipment 10 VAR 4,200

1U013 AN/SS1-137(V)1 & (V)2 -HITS 10 VAR 3,3501U013 AN/SRS-1A(V) - COMBAT DF VAR VAR 4,2501U777 INSTALL-FMP 3,7601U777 DSA 940

1UGWOTAUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) - A VAR VAR 430

1U555 PRODUCTION SUPPORT 209 1U777 INSTALL-FMP 111

Classified 22,000

Total 45,750

Unclassified Exhibit P-5, Budget Item Justification


February 2007

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $6.966

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Other Procurement, Navy BA 02 GCCS-M Equipment

February 2007


Reason funds are required: JG050: Tactical/Mobile provides evolutionary systems and ancillary equipment upgrades to support the Unified, Fleet, and Navy Component Commanders, the Maritime Sector, Theater, and the Naval Liaison Element Commanders (Ashore) with the capability to plan, direct and control the tactical operations of Joint and Naval Expeditionary Forces and other assigned units within their respective area of responsibility. These operations include littoral, open ocean, and over land all sensor (i.e. Electro Optical (EO), Infrared (IR), Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR), etc.) surveillance, anti-surface warfare, over-the-horizon targeting, counter-drug operations, power projection, antisubmarine warfare, mining, search and rescue, and special operations. Each TacMobile system has a command & control component and a communications, networks & mobility component. The Command and Control services are provided by GCCS-M and include core GCCS-M capabilities, analysis and correlation of diverse sensor information; data management support, command decision aids; access to rapid data communication, mission planning and evaluation; dissemination of ocean surveillance positional data and threat alerts to operational users ashore and afloat. The communications and mobility component provides communications interconnectivity between various joint and naval commands, as well as the components necessary to make the systems mobile and self-sustaining in operational environments. The Tactical/Mobile System includes the fixed site Tactical Support Centers (TSCs) or equivalent and the Mobile Operations Control Centers (MOCCs) or equivalent which is a mobile version of the TSC for contingency operations; and the scaleable and highly portable Joint Mobile Ashore Support Terminal (JMAST). TacMobile systems are undergoing a transformation from fixed sites to a more mobile, expeditionary Force to better support the Navy's surge requirements.

GWOT: Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) is required for Naval Component Commander Ashore JMAST (Joint Mobile Ashore Support Terminal) and MOCC (Mobile Operations Control Center) units for Coalition interoperability in Iraq and Afghanistan. Operations are conducted jointly with Coalition forces and timely/accurate exchanges of information (voice and data) are critical for success. Therefore, there is a requirement for installation of CENTRIXS on four JMAST units and ten MOCC (Mobile Operations Control Center) units. Additioanlly, MOCC facilities (tents, generators and environmental control units) are required for two units in Iraq and Afghanistan along with MOCC Super High Frequency (SHF) Trutime synchronization devices for connecting to Network Operations Centers (NOC) for the establishment of SIPR, NIPR, VTC and phone connectivity.

Due to reduced capabilities at this time in Iraq and Afghanistan and aging AN/USC-60A SHF systems the USC-60A SHF communication capabilities are now lagging behind with coalition and joint-war-fighters requirements. Therefore replacement of two units are now required. Funds will procure a smaller and lighter SHF system has been identified as the Tri-band Swe-Dish 1.5 meter system, which is DSCS certified, a contract vehicle in place, has data rates up to 60 Mbps, and meets all other required specifications as a suitable replacement.

An additional requirement supports generators (45KW) due to increasing power demands, existing generators are not able to meet normal demands. Units need additional generating power to cover increasing wartime operations. Six generators are required now at six Forward Operating Locations (FOL). Additional Radio Communications Capability, Per CTF-57 classified message DTG 151020Z SEP06, requires concurrent Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Forces (MPRF) multi-site expeditionary operations which necessitates additional VHF, UHF and HF capabilities. Suite would include PRC-117F( with amplifiers, antennas, etc) and one TMR-8092 (with amplifiers, antennas, etc.).



COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIP GCCS-M Equipment 52JG

PY FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009COST ID TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTALCODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COSTJG050 SHF COMMUNICATIONS SET A 2 375 750

JG050 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT A 2 300 600

JG050 SHF SYNCH DEVICES A 10 50 500

JG050 CENTRIXS A 14 190 2,660

JG777 INSTALLATIONS A 1,602

JG050 GENERATORS (45KW) A 4 64 256

JG050 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT A 1 299 299

JG050 GENERATORS (45KW) A 2 64 128

JG777 INSTALLATIONS A 171

TOTAL 6,966

Unclassified Exhibit P-5, Budget Item Justification


February 2007


BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE:P-40 February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 281500, MARINE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL AND LANDING SYSTEMS Program Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

NOT APPLICABLE 0604504NPrior ID ToYears Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

QUANTITY 29 29COST(In Millions) A $10.890 $10.890

DESCRIPTION: The Marine Corps has identified a requirement stemming from the Global War On Terrorism (Operation Iraqi Freedom) for a more accurate man-portable Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) system for combat operations. The AN/TRN-41 will provide a + one degree of accuracy, man-portable, Instrument FlightConditions (IFC) certifiable with an independent monitor TACAN for use by the Marine Air Traffic Control Detachments (MATC Dets). Each MATC Det provides arrival,departure, and enroute air traffic control for one Expeditionary Airfield and three forward sites. This equipment will allow for accurate and certifiable TACAN approachesinto and out of remote sites enabling safer and faster services at Forward Area Rearm/Refuel Pads, remote operating sites, and landing zones during the conduct ofcombat operations. Current man-portable equipment provides only a + 5 degree of accuracy TACAN signal and does not have an independent monitor, which makesthe current system non-certifiable. (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 20.179 0.0 10.890 31.069

REQUIREMENT: The requirement for this capability is found in the Deputy Commandant for Aviation ltr 1000 over AVN (APC) of 11 May 2006, the Marine Air ControlGroup (MACG) Operational Advisory Group (OAG) Results of 2003 and 2005, the USMC Operation & Organization Concept for the Air Traffic Navigation Integration andCoordination System (ATNAVICS); Ch 1 dtd 8 Sep 2005, and a Naval Aviation General Use Hazardous Reporting (GENUSE HAZREP) dtd 011326Z May 2006.

INSTALLATION AGENT: SPAWAR SYSTEM CENTER San Diego, CA (SSCSD); Facilities to receive the equipment: MATC Dets and field support activities.

P-1 Shopping List Item No 56CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

(Exhibit P-40, Page 1 of 4)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDWeapon System DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

A


Prior Years

Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost QTY Unit Cost Total Cost

MJ440 DAME A 29 376 10,890

29 10,890

FY 2006 FY 2007

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY\ BA 2 - Communications and Electronic Equipment

WEAPONS SYSTEM COST ANALYSIS

ID CodeCost Code

P-5

Element of Cost

281500, MATCALS

FY 2009

February 2007

FY 2008

P-1 Shopping List Item No 56

CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-5, Page 2 of 4)


BUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System

B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY / BA 2 - Communications and Electronic Equipment 281500, MATCALS

Cost Element/Fiscal Year QtyUnit Cost

(000) Location of PCORFP Issue

Date

Contract Method &

Type Contractor and LocationAward Date

Date of First

Delivery

Specs Available

Now

Date Revisions Available

MJ440 DAME*

FY07 29 376 NAVAIR 3/07 C/FFP TBD 7/07 7/08 YES

REMARKS: A source for an off-the-shelf man-portable TACAN has been identified. However, no contract negotiations have been initiated.Cost is estimated based on manufacture's charges for current production quantity of two units.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P5A, page 3 of 4)

P-1 Shopping List Item No 56

A. DATE February 2007

SUBHEAD

Y2MJ


FY 06 PRES BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/ BA-2Production Rate Procurement Leadtimes


DAME TBD 24 24 36 9 12 21 E

FISCAL YEAR 2006 FISCAL YEAR 2007ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B 2005 CALENDAR YEAR 2006 CALENDAR YEAR 2007

Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MJ440 DAME 07 N 29 0 29 A 29


Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MJ440 DAME 07 N 29 0 29 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 0

Remarks: Delivery schedule based upon money received in June 2007.

DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete P-1 SHOPPING LIST Production Schedule311 / 244 ITEM NO. 56 (Exhibit P-21, page 4 of 4)

281500, MARINE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYSTEM

Date:




Proc Qty 2Gross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 40.9

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C .0

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-02 Portable Radios: 3033

March 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $25,365 0 $ 40,850 $101,215

Narrative DescriptionRequirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with GWOT related Communications Equipment, i.e.ELMR, satellite phones and Trunking Land Mobile Radio/Consolidated Dispatch Centers. These efforts assist with freeing military master-at-arms (MA) personnel for Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) missions through technology insertion while also providing technologies and capabilities to strengthen OCONUS/CONUS installation force protection and consequence management preparedness, response, and recovery

Reason funds are requiredTrunking Land Mobile Radios, consolidated dispatch centers & network integration for bases in Sigonella & Naples, Italy; Souda Bay, Greece & Rota, Spain. CNRE core installations at Rota, SP, Naples and Sigonella, IT and Souda Bay, GR provide key logistics services supporting ship and aircraft movements and command and control services for the warfighter combating the Global War on Terrorism.

Per the 9/11 Commission, and in support of improving Navy capabilities to combat the GWOT, improved communication equipment will increase pre-terrorist attack preparation/warning, increase capabilities associated with defending against attack, while also providing technologies and capabilities to strengthen OCONUS/CONUS installation force protection and consequence management preparedness, response, and recovery.


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDDATE: Mar-07

P-5 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEADOther Procurement, Navy/BA-02 Portable Radios



Total Cost Quantity Unit CostTotal Cost QuantityUnit CostTotal CostQuantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

GWOT Related Communications Equipment (i.e., ELMR, satelitte phones) var 11,200

Trunking Land Mobile Radio/Consolidated Dispatch Centers var 29,650

40,850 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:

ITEM NO. 73 PAGE NO. 2

UNCLASSIFIED

Department of the NavyFY 2007 GWOT Supplemental Budget Submit

N/A

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) A. DATE March 2007


Portable RadiosOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-02

CONTRACT DATE OF SPECS DATECost Element/ QUANTITY UNIT LOCATION RFP ISSUE METHOD CONTRACTOR AWARD FIRST AVAILABLE REVISIONSFISCAL YEAR COST OF PCO DATE & TYPE AND LOCATION DATE DELIVERY NOW AVAILABLE

(000)FY07

GWOT Related Communications Equipment (i.e., ELMR, satelitte phones)OCONUS/CONUS

Installations TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBDTrunking Land Mobile Radio/Consolidated Dispatch Centers CNRE TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

D. REMARKS P-1 SHOPPING LIST: 73 CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED

Department of the NavyFY 2007 Supplemental Budget Submit

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $5.8

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT GWOT - 3050 Ship Communication Automation

February 2007

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $208,284 $ 5,784 $214,068

Reason funds are required: Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System - Maritime (CENTRIXS-M) (PQ007): The Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) program provides US Navy ships with secure, reliable, high-speed Local Area Network (LAN) with access to the Coalition Wide Area Network (WAN) to include CENTRIXS Four-Eyes (CFE), Global Counter Terrorism Task Force (GCTF), NATO Information Data Transfer System (NIDTS), Multinational Coalition Force - Iraq (MCFI), bilateral networks such as combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System - US/Japan (CENTRIXS-J) and Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System - US/Korea (CENTRIXS-K), and Communities Of Interest (COI) virtual networks such as Coalition Naval Forces - CENTCOM (CNFC), and Cooperative Maritime Forces - Pacific (CMFP). The CENTRIXS system provides real-time tactical and operational information sharing at the SECRET and SECRET REL (Releasable) level between naval afloat units, Component Commanders, Fleet Commanders, Numbered Fleet Commanders and Coalition Forces/Allies. When the CENTRIXS network is combined with other subsystems (Radio/Satellite Comms), it delivers an end-to-end network centric war fighting capability. The CENTRIXS program is comprised of Block 0, I and II systems fielded across the Fleet, and Increment 1 which provides a network infrastructure that allows simultaneous access to multiple Coalition Wide Area Networks (WAN) and incorporates the Common PC Operating System Environment (COMPOSE). COMPOSE provides a server and client operating system environment for other applications and collaborative tools such as Sametime Chat, Domino and Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC) as means to share a Common Operational Picture (COP) and exchange information using Collaboration At Sea (CAS). The CENTRIXS program uses both Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) hardware and software and Open Standards to maximize commercial technology and support. In-service engineering and technical support ensures existing systems are upgraded and modified to keep pace with current technology and industry.

GWOT: The Client increase takes the current baseline of 3 clients on AN/USQ-153A(V)6 and 10 clients on AN/USQ-153B(V)6 to 7 and 20, respectfully. This upgrade is in support of GWOT operations. Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) capability will be installed on CENTCOM AOR deployed submarines.



COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPGWOT - 3050 Ship Communication Automation 52PQ

TOTAL COSTS IN THOUSAND OF DOLLARSFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

COST ID UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTALCODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COST QTY COST COSTPQ068 SCI Networks 1,573

SCI Networks Afloat 26 61 1,573

PQ007 ISNS 440CENTRIXS-M 39 11 440

Procurement Total 2,013

PQ777 FMP Install 3,070SCI Networks Afloat 1,422CENTRIXS-M 39 42 1,648

PQ777 DSA Install 701SCI Networks Afloat 289CENTRIXS-M 412

Install Total 3,771

BUDGET EXHIBIT TOTAL 5,784


P-1 Shopping List-Item No 74 Page 2 of 2

February 2007


Date:



$MillionsFY 2007

SupplementalProc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1)

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY BA-1: SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Communications Items under $5M

February 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $12,523 $ 10,777 $23,300

Reason funds are required: Funding is requested to address current and anticipated Global War on Terror (GWOT) requirements placed on the Navy's Riverine Force program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with providing tactical communications equipment, counter improved explosives device (IED) equipment and Blue Force Tracking (BFT) equipment for operational Riverine Squadrons. Equipment will be installed on Riverine cambatant craft and supporting tactical vehicles and will be used in ashore-based station locations. This request will accelerate specific force capabilities necessary to prosecute the war.


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDDATE: Feb-07

P-5 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD Other Procurement, Navy/BA-7 Communications Items < $5M



Total Cost Quantity Unit CostTotal Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

AN/PRC-152 VHF-UHF Radio 78 10,000 780,000

AN/PRC-152 Accessory Kits 78 11,000 858,000

AN/PRC-152 VAA (50 watts) 78 11,000 858,000

Multi-band antennae 78 3,500 273,000

AN/PRC-117 VHF-UHF TACSAT Radio 23 27,000 621,000


TACSAT Amplifier/Pre-Amplifier 23 12,000 276,000

TACSAT "On-the-move" Antennae 23 11,000 253,000

AN/PRC-150 (HF-VHF Radio) 23 22,000 506,000


HF Coupler 23 2,000 46,000

HF Antennae 24 1,300 31,200AN/VIC-3 23 1,500 34,500

SURVIVAL RADIOS (CSEL) 23 15,100 347,300DATA TRANSFER DEVICES 23 500 11,500KYK-13 CRYPTO LOADER (OR EQUAL) 23 40 920CABLING 25 7 175

LAPTOPS (S)/PRINTERS 47 3,000 141,000PDC-600 (OR EQUAL) 23 5,000 115,000

IED ECM 28 128,000 3,584,000BLUE FORCE TRACKING DEVICES 74 18,000 1,332,000Total 786 312,747 10,776,995

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:ITEM NO. 75 PAGE NO. 2

UNCLASSIFIED


Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $1.1

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OP,N - BA2 COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT GWOT - 3368 NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATIONS

February 2007


Reason funds are required: The Naval Shore Communications program procures and installs the Defense Message System (DMS) and Base Level Information Infrastructure (BLII) requirements at shore stations. (1) Defense Message System (D6001): DMS is the DoD-mandated Joint organizational messaging program. DMS implements the high assurance requirements of the Multicommand Required Operational Capability 3-88 change 2 dated 1 Oct 1997. DMS is an integrated suite of COTS-based applications that provide delivery of organizational messages on the Defense Information System Network (DISN) for strategic (ashore) and tactical (afloat) interoperability.

The USN DMS program provides for the planning, procurement, integration and installation necessary to upgrade/refresh all USN and select USMC components at the messaging control centers (aka DMS Service Provider), and remaining transitional messaging systems. Continuing upgrade of DMS components ensures end-to-end, Jointly interoperable messaging capabilities for all Naval activities. DMS Hardware/Software components include shore and tactical gateway message processing systems, secure access management systems, and the web based DMS Expanded Boundary Solution (DEBS). Specific configurations implemented at individual sites vary to such a degree that aggregate quantities (and unit costs) are not applicable and would be misleading.

GWOT: To plan and execute the Global War on Terrorism, DoD relies on Defense Message System (DMS) organizational messaging. Requirement includes: 1) Procurement of 8 Defense Message System (DMS) Certificate Authority Workstation (CAW) 5.0 systems required to replace aging CAW 4.3.1 hardware (6 full portable systems and 2 desktop systems). 2) Pre-Installation Test and Check-Out (PITCO), database setup, shipment, and on the job training of portable systems for tactical units and setup of desktop systems at tactical training/test sites. 3) Procurement of 80 JUMBO FORTEZZA cards to be used with the new tactical systems.



COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEADOP,N - BA-2 COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT GWOT - 3368 NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATION52D6


D6001 Defense Messaging Systems (DMS) Var 739 Upgrades Var 739

D6776 Non-FMP Installation 338Defense Messaging Systems (DMS) 338

BUDGET EXHIBIT TOTAL 1,077


P-1 Shopping List-Item No 83 Page 2 of 2

February 2007

Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) $7.497

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OP,N - BA3 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT GWOT - 4226 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT

February 2007

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $14,341 $500 $7,497 $22,338

Reason funds are required: Naval Integrated Tactical Environmental Sub-System (NITES), formerly Tactical Environmental Support System (TESS). NITES provides the warfighter with analysis, forecasting and modeling tools to perform analysis on the impact of METOC conditions on weapons, sensors, and systems. METOC products and data are made available to the warfighter via web technology, briefing systems, Non-secure Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) and Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET).

GWOT: Funds support 11 NITES IV mobile systems currently deployed with USMC forces to IRAQ, requiring hardware refresh, ceilometers, and lightning detectors and 3 Naval Integrated Tactical Environmental Sub-System (NITES) IV mobile systems currently deployed to Afghanistan requiring hardware refresh, 30 NITES IV mobile systems for NSW (SEALS) teams that are forward deployed in support of GWOT operations and 12 NITES IV mobile systems are required for Strike Group Oceanography Teams that are forward deployed in support of GWOT operations. Upgrade NITES IV components: Ehternet switches, external HDDs, UPS, Projectors, Printers and INMARSATs for combat operations support (harsh environment). NITES Ashore systems upgrade required for Bahrain METOC facility, which utilizes a robust system for warfighter battlespace environmental characterization in support of multiple GWOT operations (the facility's aging system is not funded for upgrade).

Additionally, funds will provide the MWSS METOC Sections with a critical stand-alone meteorological sensing capability to enhance the accuracy and timeliness of critical meteorological information required to support tactical flight operations and enhance safety of flight support. Rapidly changing meteorological conditions to include fluctuating cloud heights and visibility within the CENTCOM AOR require a 24-hour, autonomously operated meteorological sensor suite capable of precisely sensing/observing and recording all meteorological parameters to enhance the MWSS METOC Section's ability to alert the ATC tower, flying squadrons, pilots, and aircrew when minimum and/or severe meteorological conditions impact the safe launch and recovery of aircraft at an enduring FON/FARP. The capability to track severe weather conditions utilizing real time location, identification and tracking of potential lightening strikes produced by Thunderstorms will enhance safety of flight support as well as enhance Force Protection support for personnel and equipment located at a FOB/FARP.



COST ANALYSIS

APPROPRIATION ACTIVITY SUBHEAD OP,N - BA3 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 53SP


GWOTTESS Upgrades - GWOT Supplemental A VAR 6.940

GWOTTESS Upgrades - GWOT Supplemental A VAR 0.557

Met Equipment (METMF(R)) Upgrades

TOTAL CONTROL 7.497



February 2007

CLASSIFICATION:

BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE:P-40 February 2007


OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY BA-3 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 424400, AVIATION LIFE SUPPORTProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements

Prior ID To

Years Code FY 2006FY 2007

Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

QUANTITYCOST(In Millions) A $3.3 $3.3

CLASSIFICATION:

P-1 No. 95 PAGE NO. 1

UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:P-1 No. 95 PAGE NO. 1

UNCLASSIFIED

This account provides for the acquisition, upgrade, and production support of aviation life support systems required for the personal safety and protection of aircrew againstthe hazards encountered in the aircraft operating environment and for safe recovery of downed aircrew.

AN/AVS NIGHT VISION GOGGLE IMAGE TUBESAll AN/AVS-9 Night Vision Goggles (NVG's) currently fielded contain OMNI IV MX-10160 image tubes. The OMNI VI MX-10160C image tube has since been developed that

provides much improved low-light performance in low contrast areas, such as desert and water, and in urban areas. The replacement of the OMNI IV image tubes with theOMNI VI image tube would give our USN/USMC operators much improved situational awareness during night operations and improve safety of flight, especially duringshipboard operations. USN/USMC is the only DOD service that is not flying with the OMNI VI image tube. Recently there were two deployed ships that had their HoffmanTest Sets become non-RFI during deployment leaving them without NVG maintenance capability. CNAF had to move test sets from CONUS activities, leaving them with onlyone test set for a large quantity of NVG's. This could result in night missions being constrained due to lack of RFI NVG's. With the majority of the missions being conductedat night, it would severely constrain overall night operations in desert environments and shipboard operations.

ANV-126 TEST SET FOR AN/AVS-9 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES (NVGs)Approximately 70% of the flights are night missions and the AN/AVS-9 Night Vision Goggles (NVG) are used for all USN/USMC aviation night operations. The Hoffman Test

Set is the Intermediate-Level maintenance test set. Thirty-two Hoffman Test Sets are 12 years old as they were procured for the MXU-810/U NVG and were adapted fortesting of the AN/AVS-9 NVG when they were fielded. These test sets are failing due to age and high usage. Also, additional NVG's have been procured due to new userswithout additional test equipment being procured. Due to this, we have a shortage of 24 Hoffman Test Sets, which is documented in SERMIS. Recently there were twodeployed ships that had their Hoffman Test Sets become non-RFI during deployment leaving them without NVG maintenance capability. CNAF had to move test sets fromCONUS activities, leaving them with only one test set for a large quantity of NVG's. This could result in night missions being constrained due to lack of RFI NVG's.

AN/AVS-9 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES (NVG’s)Approximately 73 AN/AVS-9 NVG'S have been lost due to mishaps, thefts, etc. resulting in insufficient inventories for night operations. When the AN/AVS-9 NVGprocurement was done, only the inventory objective documented in the AN/AVS-9 NVG Weapons Systems Planning Document was bought. Approximately 70% of the flightsare night missions and AN/AVS-9 NVG's are required to support the increased role the USN/USMC has in OIF/OEF operations. AN/AVS-9 NVG's greatly increase situationalawareness during shipboard operations resulting in safety of flight.

FY2007Baseline FY2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Title 1X Supplemental Total$15.461 -0- $3.3 $18.761


To provide goggles to support emerging requirements from new aircraft platforms and in-service aircraft being converted with NVG compatible cockpit lighting.

CLASSIFICATION:

BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET FOR AGGREGATED ITEMS DATE:P-40a February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY BA-3 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 424400, AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT

ID Prior ToProcurement Items Code Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete Total

NVG TUBES AQuantity 753 753 Funding 1.770 1.770

ANV-126 TEST SETS A Quantity 24 24 Funding 0.660 0.660

AN/AVS-9 NVG A Quantity 87 87 Funding 0.870 0.870

Total P-1 Funding 3.300 3.300

CLASSIFICATION:

DD Form 2454, JUN 86 P-1 No. 95 PAGE NO. 2

UNCLASSIFIED

Date:




Proc Qty 2.0Gross Cost 1.0

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 1.0

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 1.0

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-5 General Purpose Vehicles: 6007

February 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $ 2,191 0 $ 961 $3,152

Narrative DescriptionRequirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with two (2) Hazardous Material Vehicles. Vehicles are needed to meet All Hazard's response for HAZMAT and Military Working Dog (MWD) per the NFPA 472 standards and DODI 6055.6.

Reason funds are requiredRequirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with two (2) Hazardous Material Vehicles to meet the "All Hazards" response for HAZMAT and MWD per the NFPA 472 Standards and DODI 6055.6, request two GSA Advantage, Pierce Manufacturing Lance Hazmat Command Vehicles.



P-5 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEADOther Procurement, Navy/BA-5 General Purpose Vehicle




HAZMAT Vehicle 2 481 961

2 961 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED


N/A

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) A. DATE Feb 07


General Purpose VehicleOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-5


(000)FY08

HAZMAT Vehicle 2 481 CNRMW TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

2D. REMARKS

P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86 ITEM NO. 121 PAGE NO. 3

UNCLASSIFIED


Date:




QUANTITYCOST (In Millions) 173.861

SPARES COST (In Millions)

February 2007

Other Procurement, Navy/ BA 5, Civil Engineering Support Equipment/ LI 602400/CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT


(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 35,050 48,584 173,861 257,495

The requested FY 2007 Supplemental funds in the amount of $174M are for replacement of 1,829 pieces of earthmoving equipment, miscellaneous construction equipment, and cranes required primarily for the Seabees for combat operations.

Combat operations continue to take a toll on Seabee equipment. The consumption rate for equipment engaged in combat operations is 14 times greater than the peacetime average. For some pieces of equipment the usage rate has been 40 to 1. Heavy equipment is a critical enabler for combat construction. Construction projects, maintaining lines of communications, and maintaining supply routes are critical enablers for war fighter mobility. The lack of equipment availability places the Seabees, Marines and other service members, with which Seabees operate, at risk. This supplemental request is to ensure that the equipment to support these engineer units is capable of operating successfully in the harsh environment of OIF. Age, environment, and op-tempo in combat operations have degraded this equipment beyond economical repair. This situation is exacerbated by the inability to obtain repair parts from the original equipment manufacturer. Increasing the recapitalization timeline and/or the service life of equipment has a direct corollary to reduced readiness and increased maintenance cost. Mean time between failure decreases, maintenance workload increases, and equipment is not available to perform the intended wartime construction mission. While age is a critical factor, it is not the only obsolescence indicator. Currently 29% of approved Table of Allowance (TOA) items are filled with substitute items. This equipment does not provide the operational capability or capacity required to operate in a joint service combat environment. This equipment becomes a liability to members of other Services when they are required to operate with the Seabees.

Procurement lead time (to manufacturer the equipment, make military unique modifications to the commercial off the shelf items, and transport the equipment from the factory to the GWOT port of debarkation) requires funding as early as possible to begin replacement of in-theater equipment as well as equipment to outfit expeditionary units requried to meet OPlan for Major Combat Operations.

This P-1 line is for equipment used for a variety of construction, maintenance, and repair operations. This equipment is used by Naval Construction Force (NCF), Naval Beach Group (NBG), Maritime Pre-positioning Force (MPF), and other Special Operating Units, in support of advance bases and camp sites. The types of equipment are: EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT - equipment such as ditching machines, excavators, graders, wheeled and tracked loaders, rollers, compactors, scrapers, off- highway dump trucks, crawler tractors, and industrial tractors. This equipment constitutes the backbone of the Naval Construction Force (NCF) in meeting their advanced base construction mission. Dependable earth moving equipment in the fleet and shore inventories is required for the building and renovation of runways and roads, demolition activities at old building sites, and underground utilities excavation.

P-1 ITEM NO. 1221 OF 9 EXHIBIT P-40

Date:






February 2007

Other Procurement, Navy/ BA 5, Civil Engineering Support Equipment/ LI 602400/CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT

MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT- equipment used for a variety of construction purposes. There are four major categories of miscellaneous construction equipment: General mix, batch, concrete and asphalt working equipment - equipment such as portable concrete mixers, rock crushers, asphalt and water distributors, aggregate spreaders, and asphalt and rubberized compound heating kettles are used to provide aggregate materials for asphalt mixing plants and concrete batching plants. Used by the NCF to provide advance base and forward port facility construction and for runway, taxi apron, and work area paving projects. Also supports shore activities' small construction/maintenance needs such as foundations, sidewalks, curbs and gutters and for repaving/repairing streets and parking lots. Air compressors and drilling operations equipment - portable air compressors of various sizes and capacities for construction and maintenance projects; rock drills for quarry production; pile hammers and extractors for construction, repair, and disassembly of causeways, docks, piers, and wharves; earth augers to support electrical distribution and communications systems; well drilling machines to supply water in support of Marine Corps contingencies and construction battalions at camp sites and advance bases. Floodlights and generators - portable floodlight trailers (with 6kW generators), used by the NCF to provide light for around-the-clock construction efforts, and shore facilities to provide light for maintenance, repair, and other nighttime operations; generators used as portable power to support items such as power tools to runway lighting and backup systems for electrical power distribution. This equipment is part of the DOD Mobile Electric Power Program (PM-MEP) which provides reliable standardized generators for all DOD components. Grounds/other miscellaneous maintenance - welders, sweepers, sewer cleaners, decontamination apparatus, snowplows, machine shop trailers, and railway maintenance equipment. Equipment is used for a variety of maintenance, repair and construction operations and for purification and decontamination of personnel and equipment.

Funding allocated for the procurement of reserve equipment is displayed on the P-5R. Delivery schedules displayed on the P-5A are representative of the delivery schedules for reserve equipment.


LINE ITEM6024000

COST CODE

IDENT CODE QTY

TOTAL COST QTY TOTAL COST QTY

TOTAL COST

XH56A A 584 97,269

XH56B A 1,222 54,150

XH56C A 23 9,863

XH56D A 12,579

TOTAL 1,829 173,861

INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT

PROGRAM COST BREAKDOWN

ELEMENT OF COSTEARTHMOVING

MISC. CONSTRUCTION

CRANES

TOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARSFY 2008FY 2006 FY 2007

BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT K5XHConstruction and Maintenance Equipment

APPROPRIATION DATEOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY February 2007


LINE ITEM6024000

COST CODE

IDENT CODE QTY


TOTAL COST

XH56A A

XH56B A 46 942

XH56C A

XH56D A

TOTAL 46 942


BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT K5XHConstruction and Maintenance Equipment

CRANES



ELEMENT OF COSTEARTHMOVING

MISC. CONSTRUCTION


P-1 ITEM NO. 1224 OF 9 EXHIBIT P-5R

LINE ITEM6024000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL

YEARCONTRACTOR AND LOCATION

CONTRACT METHOD AND TYPE

AWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITYUNIT COST

($000)SPECS

AVAIL NOW

SPEC REVISION REQUIRED IF YES, WHEN

XH56A EARTHMOVING

FY07 UNKNOWN MIPR/FP DSCP/GSA May-07 Aug-07 584 36-561 YES NOREMARKS

CONTRACTOR LOCATION DATE U/P QTY U/P

JOHN DEERE MOLINE, IL Apr-06 185,085 23 189,120 CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Nov-06 186,301 100 186,301

CATERPILLER MOSSEVILLE, IL Jan-06 239,077 40 244,289

CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Apr-06 141,750 53 144,840

JOHN DEERE MOLINE, IL Mar-06 35,181 120 35,948

CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Aug-96 57,434 - 74,595

HYSTER CLEVELAND, OH Feb-87 140,160 7 226,078

CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Apr-06 128,691 45 131,496

MKT SURVEY Nov-06 281,995 20 281,995

CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Jul-03 394,111 10 432,497 GERBUS EQUIP Apr-86 115,517 12 190,869 CATERPILLER PEORIA, IL Dec-03 188,662 52 202,114 MKT SURVEY Jun-05 221,939 8 231,948

MKT SURVEY Nov-06 133,034 24 133,034

MKT SURVEY Aug-06 143,178 - 143,178

DRESSER LIBERTYVILLE, IL May-90 100,012 28 150,088

MKT SURVEY Aug-06 117,392 - 120,000

DITCHING EXCAVATOR

ROLLER TANDEM DRUM

LOADER WHEELED

105 HORSE POWER STRAIGHT BLADE 195 HORSE POWER SEMI-U BLADE WINCH

195 HORSE POWER D7G W/WINCH

DRUM ENCLOSED CAB AIR TRANSPORTABLE

SCRAPER-TRACTOR 11 CY 613C

SCRAPER-TRACTOR DED 4X2 14-20 CY ECDUMP OFF-HIGHWAY TRUCK 20 TON 4X2

SCOOP LOADER, SKID STEER, 73 HP MINIMUM, DED

MOTORIZED COMPACTOR SELF-PROPELLED

ROLLER MOTORIZED COMPACT TAMP EC

CRAWLER MOUNTED PAVEMENT BREAKER WITH BUCKETS

OPEN ROPS

2 1/2 CUBIC YARD BUCKET OPEN ROPS

2 1/2 CUBIC YARD BUCKET, FORKS

CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07

BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIMENT K5XHCONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT

PROGRAM COST BREAKDOWNAPPROPRIATION DATE

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY February 2007

P-1 ITEM NO. 1225 OF 9

EXHIBIT P-5A

LINE ITEM6024000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL



AWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITYUNIT COST

($000)SPECS

AVAIL NOW


XH56A EARTHMOVING

FY07 UNKNOWN MIPR/FP DSCP/GSA May-07 Aug-07 584 36-561 YES NOREMARKS


CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07

BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIMENT K5XHCONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT



MKT SURVEY Aug-06 176,162 24 180,000

MKT SURVEY Aug-06 548,789 15 560,746 FORD NEW HOLLAND, PA Sep-94 31,458 - 42,874 CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Nov-06 93,335 3 93,335 60 HORSE POWER 4X2 LOADER 1 CUBIC

ARTICULATING DUMP

TRACTOR CRAWLER 300hpMTD PTO,540 RPM,PINTLE HOOK,PWR

P-1 ITEM NO. 1226 OF 9

EXHIBIT P-5A

LINE ITEM6024000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL



AWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITY

UNIT COST ($000)

SPECS AVAIL NOW


XH56B MISC CONSTRUCTION

FY07 UNKNOWN MIPR/FP DSCP/GSA May-07 Aug-07 1,222 4-1,500 YES NOREMARKS

CONTRACTOR LOCATION DATE U/P QTY U/PARS, INC. WAYNE, PA Dec-05 305,815 3 312,482 MKT SURVEY Jun-04 300,000 321,390

MKT SURVEY 310,000 3 310,000 BLAW-KNOX PITTSBURGH, PA Jan-93 206,550 0 288,364

MKT SURVEY Oct-06 1,100,000 3 1,100,000

AMERICAN WAYNE, PA Feb-04 135,534 6 145,198

MOBIL TECH TULSA, OK Mar-93 67,756 0 94,594 STONE CONTRUCTION EQ HONEOYE, NY Oct-05 25,000 65 25,545

WEDGE DES PLAINES, IL May-94 9,600 2 13,084 CATERPILLAR PEORIA, IL Mar-02 385,690 7 433,593 BUCKEYE COLUMBUS, OH Apr-84 9,529 4 16,521 R &R LIMIT INDEPENDENCE MO Jun-01 19,750 0 22,744 INGERSOLL MOCKSVILLE, NC Oct-06 15,886 60 15,886 INGERSOLL-RAND CO. MOCKSVILLE, NC Dec-04 37,269 0 38,950 INGORSOLL MOCKSVILLE NC Aug-94 63,687 12 86,799 MKT SURVEY 168,000 8 246,120 PILECO HOUSTON, TX Apr-93 96,300 0 134,444 AMERICAN PILE KENT, WA Aug-05 183,315 12 191,583 ARS/ATLAS-COPCO WAYNE, PA Apr-06 1,181,580 0 1,207,338 MAGNUM PRODUCTS, LLC BERLIN, WI Dec-05 9,892 107 10,337 ENGINEERING ELECTRIC BRIDGEPORT, CT Mar-06 14,342 16 14,655 ENGINEERING ELECTRIC BRIDGEPORT, CT Sep-05 15,356 30 16,049 L-3 COMMUNICATION TULSA, OK Mar-06 26,194 169 26,765 L-3 COMMUNICATION TULSA, OK Mar-06 30,623 110 31,291 MKT SURVEY Jun-05 27,071 0 28,292 WELD WORLD BALTIMORE, MD Apr-05 19,740 160 20,630

30 KILOWATT (TQ) MEP 805B60 KILOWATT MEP806BLUBRICATING & SERVICING UNIT SKID MTD300 AMP TRAILER MOUNTED TIG CAPABILITY

1500 FT CAP ISO/AIR TRANSPORTABLELUMINARIAS10 KILOWATT MEP803A15 KILOWATT MEP804A


OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY February 2007SUBHEAD

5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIMENT K5XHCONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENTBUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE

CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07

WASHER & SCREENER AGG 75 TPH TRLR MTD

MIXER ASPHALT PLANT DRUM TYPE 70 TPH

MOBILE SEMI-TRAILER MOUNTED 8 CUBIC YARD

FOOT PAVING WIDTH, 200 FEET PER M

TRUCK MOUNTED 8 CUBIC YARD 6X4 DED

CONCRETE BATCH PLANT 100 CY TRLR MTDCONCRETE BATCH PLANT 100 CY TRLR MTD

WHEEL MOUNTED 11 CUBIC FOOTCONCRETE SAW 12-24 INCH BLADE 6-9 INCH CUT DEDDISTRIBUTOR WATER 8000 GAL DED OFF-HWYSPREADER CHIP AGGREGATE 12 FT TOWED

EXTRACTOR PILE AIR 100 TON LINE PULL

CONVEYOR BELT PORTABLE 24 IN X 60 FT EMD250 CUBIC FOOT MINUTE750 CUBIC FOOT MINUTE

16000 FOOT POUNDS WITH LEADSDRILL ROCK HYD DRIFTER DED TRK MTDSUPPORT WELL DRILLS

P-1 ITEM NO. 1227 OF 9 EXHIBIT P-5A

LINE ITEM6024000




MACH II Aug-02 5,475 44 6,155 ABS PUMPS INC. MILWAUKEE, WI Mar-06 3,440 36 3,515 ABS PUMPS INC. MILWAUKEE, WI Jul-04 15,478 46 16,582 CH&E MFG MILWAUKEE, WI Jun-00 11,511 76 13,578 M.P. PUMPS FRAZER, MI Feb-93 16,130 16 22,519 A&A MAGNETIC WOODSTOCK, IL Jul-02 3,675 0 4,131 MKT SURVEY Jun-05 14,003 0 14,635 MKT SURVEY May-06 18,595 140 19,000 SOUTHWEST ARLINGTON, TX Sep-84 174,850 16 303,155 MKT SURVEY Sep-06 291,835 0 298,193 MKT SURVEY Sep-06 48,934 3 50,000 MKT SURVEY Sep-06 29,361 3 30,000 MKT SURVEY Sep-06 97,868 50 100,000 MKT SURVEY Oct-06 1,500,000 3 1,500,000 MKT SURVEY Oct-06 480,000 6 480,000 MKT SURVEY Oct-06 215,000 6 215,000 MKT SURVEY Dec-03 425,000 0 455,303

16 INCH SAWMACHINE SHOP TRAILER MOUNTED

UBM-240 ULTIMATE BUILDING MACHINE

CONCRETE PUMP TRUCKAC STORAGE TRANSFER TRAILERHOT OIL HEATER WITH A/C PUMPENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL UNITROCK CRUSHERDRILL WELL, 1500 FT CAPTRK WELL SUPPORT

WHEEL MOUNTED GEDTRAILER MOUNTEDMAGNETIC TOWED 8 FOOT SWATHSPRAY

100 GALLONS PER MINUTE (GPM)135 GAL PER MINUTE SKID MTD DEDMTD GED


LINE ITEM6024000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL



AWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITY

UNIT COST ($000)

SPECS AVAIL NOW


K5XH CRANES UNKNOWN MIPR/FP DSCP/GSA May-07 Jul-07 23 427-434 Yes No


-

LINK BELT LEXINGTON, KY Apr-06 417,876 17 426,986 MKT SURVEY 274,500 6 434,000




CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07

40 TON CAPACITY 60 TON 70 FT BOOM

CRANES TRUCK MOUNTED 2-ENGINE HYDRAULIC:


Date:




Proc Qty 1.0Gross Cost 0.7

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.7

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.7

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-5 Fire Fighting Equipment: 6027

February 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $16,659 0 $700 $17,359

Reason Funds are Required:Requirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with a new Crash and Rescue (CFR) vehicle needed at Camp Lemonier to ensure compliance with DOD requirements forairfield fire fighting capabilities and to reduce the risk of catastrophic aircraft damage and injury to personnel. DODI 6055.6 delineates three requirements for a Category 7 airfield (P-3 and C-130 aircraft stationed permanently) as follows: 1. Minimum of 2 trucks. 2. 4,874 gallons of water on scene to fight fire 3. 1581 gallons per minute (flow capacity) Requirements #1 and #3 are met with the current inventory of CFR vehicles. Camp Lemonier fails to meet Requirement #2 consistently due to frequent repair and maintenance issues associated with the aging equipment.



P-5 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEADOther Procurement, Navy/BA-5 Fire Fighting Equipment




Crash Fire Rescue Vehicle 1 700 700

1 700 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED


N/A

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) A. DATE Feb 07


Fire Fighting EquipmentOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-5


(000)FY08

Crash Fire Rescue Vehicle 1 700 CONUS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

1D. REMARKS

P-1 SHOPPING LIST: 123 CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86 ITEM NO. 123 PAGE NO. 3

UNCLASSIFIED


Date:






February 2007

Other Procurement, Navy/ BA 5, Civil Engineering Support Equipment/ LI 602800/TACTICAL VEHICLES

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 29,314 186,213 207,290 422,817 This P-1 line is for light and medium duty tactical equipment used primarily by the Naval Construction Force (NCF), Maritime Pre-positioning Force (MPF), Naval Beach Group (NBG), Naval Coastal Warfare (NCW), Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) and other special operating units. Light duty tactical vehicles (HMMWVs) are used for the movement of personnel and equipment. Medium tactical trucks are required for rapid deployment of containerized table of allowance material and have air transport, water fording, and enhanced combat mobility. Medium tactical cargo trucks are used for material/equipment movement and delivery. Medium tactical dump trucks are used to support combat construction of airfields, landing zones, road battle damage repair, and rapid runway repair.

The requested FY 2007 Supplemental funds include $161M for crew protection. The requested funds will procure 619 units for replacement of equipment lost in combat, replacement of equipment engaged in actual combat operations, and equipment to reset units which is required to meet OPLANS for Major Combat Operations (MCOs). This equipment is used across the full spectrum of combat operations by Navy expeditionary units to include Seabees and EOD forces. This equipment is critical to the success of mission objectives and to protect Navy personnel sent into harms way. Procurement lead time (to manufacture the equipment, make military unique modifications, and transport the equipment from the factory to the GWOT port of debarkation)requires funding as early as possible to begin replacement of in-theater equipment.

The $5M requested for Crew Protection is for Blue Force Trackers (BFTs), Electronic Counter Measures (ECMs). There is $156M requested for vehicles with Level I factory installed armoring. Lack of crew protection will unnecessarily jeopardize lives. The Seabees and other special operating units must be provided with modern, armored, equipment outfitted with ECMs against improvised explosive devices and BFTs to protect them from friendly fire and to track enemy locations.

Age, environment, and ops tempo in combat operations have degraded this equipment beyond economical repair. The consumption rate for equipment engaged in combat operations is14times greater that the peacetime average. Many of the equipment items were beyond the service life when deployed. While age is a critical factor, it is not the only obsolescence indicator. Currently, there are approximately 29% of the Table of Allowance (TOA) items which are filled with substitute equipment. This equipment does not provided the operational capability or capacity required to operate in a joint service combat environment. Additionally, when commercial vehicles are used as substitutes for tactical vehicles, the weight increase from installed armorexceeds the capability of the vehicles and equipment is unable to maintain convoy speed required by the Army. This situation is exacerbated by the inability to obtain repair parts from the original equipment manufacturer. Increasing the recapitalization timeline and /or the service life of equipment has a direct corollary to reduced readiness and increased maintenance costs. Mean time between failures decreases, maintenance workload increases, and equipment is not available to perform the intended wartime mission.

Funding allocated for the procurement of reserve equipment is displayed on the P-5R. Delivery schedules displayed on the P-5A are representative of the delivery schedules


LINE ITEM6028000

COST CODE

IDENT CODE QTY


TOTAL COST

XG59A A 376 52,717

XG59B A 243 134,753

XG59C A 15,065

XG59D A 4,755

TOTAL 619 207,290

* INCLUDES 183 HMMWVS WITH FACTORY INSTALLED CREW PROTECTION ARMORING AT $39M.

** INCLUDES 176 MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTIVE (MRAP) VEHICLES WITH FACTORY INSTALLED CREW PROTECTION ARMORING AT $117M.

CREW PROTECTION


ELEMENT OF COSTLIGHT TRUCKS*

MEDIUM TRUCKS**



BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIMENT TACTICAL VEHICLES K5XG



LINE ITEM6028000

COST CODE IDENT CODE QTY TOTAL COST QTY TOTAL COST QTY TOTAL COST

XG59A A 79 14,203

XG59B A 12 2,921

XG59C A

XG59D A

RESERVES TOTAL TOTAL 91 17,124



CREW PROTECTION


ELEMENT OF COSTLIGHT TRUCKS

MEDIUM TRUCKS



P-1 ITEM NO. 1243 OF 5 EXHIBIT P-5R

LINE ITEM6028000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL YEAR

CONTRACTOR AND LOCATION

CONTRACT METHOD

AND TYPEAWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITY

UNIT COST ($000)

SPECS AVAIL NOW


XG59A LIGHT TRUCKS

FY07 UNKNOWN MIPR/FP TACOM/GSA Sep-07 Dec-07 376 39-400 YES NOREMARKS


Truck Cargo:Truck, Cargo, 4x4, 2DR, LSSV General Motors Detroit, Mi Mar-06 36,000 4 38,567

Truck, Cargo, 4X4, 4DR, LSSV General Motors Detroit, Mi Mar-06 39,750 83 40,617 TRUCK HMMWV:

AM GENERAL & SOUTH BEND, IN Apr-06 155,223 56 158,607

OGARA-HESS Fairfield, OHAM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Mar-06 178,119 93 182,000 AM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Mar-06 93,008 49 95,035 AM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Jul-05 69,839 16 72,989 AM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Mar-06 71,339 0 72,893 AM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Jun-06 391,470 34 400,000 AM GENERAL SOUTH BEND, IN Sep-06 94,510 41 96,569

HMMWV - Maint Utility TruckAMB 2 LITTER 4X4 DED M1035A2

HMMWV

HMMWV 1151 - Armored

ARMAMENT CARRIER M1116 ARMORED

HMMWV 1151

HMMWV - SOF Variant Armored

CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07




P-1 ITEM NO. 1244 OF 5 EXHIBIT P-5a

LINE ITEM6028000

LINE ITEM /FISCAL YEAR

CONTRACTOR AND LOCATION


AWARD DATE

DATE OF FIRST

DELIVERY QUANTITY

UNIT COST ($000)

SPECS AVAIL NOW


XG59B MEDIUM TRUCKS

FY07 UNKNOWN MIPR/FP MARINES QUANTICO May-07 Jul-07 243 243-666 YES NOREMARKS

CONTRACTOR LOCATION DATE U/P QTY U/PMEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT

OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Sep-05 233,610 3 244,146 OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Mar-06 238,263 43 243,457

CARGO

OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Mar-06 258,296 18 263,927 OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Mar-06 285,150 0 291,336

OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Sep-05 506,490 3 529,333

MKT SURVEY May-06 267,915 0 273,756

MKT SURVEY Apr-06 324,000 0 331,063 OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Apr-06 281,117 0 287,242 MKT SURVEY Apr-06 409,000 0 417,916 MKT SURVEY Jun-06 238,940 0 244,146 OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Apr-05 236,451 0 241,603

FORCE PROTECTION, INC LADSON, SC 757,883 0 774,773 MKT SURVEY Jun-06 440,404 0 450,000

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH VEHICLE (MRAP) MKT SURVEY Oct-06 665,987 176 665,987



5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIMENT TACTICAL VEHICLES K5XGBUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE

CONTRACTED BY

DESCRIPTIONFY 07

CARGO 8 TON 6X6

TRACTOR 8 TON 6X6

WRECKER 8 TON 6X6

CARGO 8 TON MK25 W/GUN MOUNT

FIELD SERVICING 8 TON

FUEL/WATER 8 TON 6X6 1500 GAL

DISTRIBUTOR ASPHALT 2000 GAL 8 TONDISTRIBUTOR WATER 2000 GAL 8 TON 6X6AUGER EARTH TRUCK MTD 8 TON 6X6

TRUCK TRACTOR HEAVY

TRUCK MAINTENANCE OVRHD DUMP 8 TON MTVR

JERRVJOINT ENGINEERED RAPID RESPONSE VEHICLE

P-1 ITEM NO. 1245 OF 5 EXHIBIT P-5a

Date:






Other Procurement, Navy/ BA 5, Civil Engineering Support Equipment/ LI 606000/Items Less than $5Mil

February 2007

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 41,477 19,203 28,446 89,126 Reason funds are requiredThe requested FY 2007 Supplemental funds provide replacement of equipment attrited in theater, replacement of equipment engaged in actual combat operations, and equipment required to meet global demand signals. This equipment is used across the full spectrum of combat operations by Navy expeditionary units to include Seabees, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), Navy Expeditionary Medical Support Units (NEMSU), Naval Coastal Warfare (NCW) and Naval Support Elements (NSE). This equipment is critical to the success of the DoD and Navy mission objectives.

SPECIAL PURPOSE TRUCKS - This program includes special purpose vehicles and trailers of commercial design which support the Naval Construction Force (NCF), shore activities, and other special operating units. Included are: tank trucks used to transport fuel to construction equipment at remote locations; waste disposal trucks used to transport waste oil/water at industrial and shore activities; overhead maintenance trucks with insulated buckets and pole and line trucks used for repair/replacement of power systems; wreckers used in vehicle recovery/towing; field servicing vehicles used for on-site preventive maintenance of construction equipment in the field; and ammunition handling trucks used in loading/unloading and transporting munitions. Also in the program are truck tractors and trailers required by the active operating forces and shore activities in the logistics support of the fleet and shore establishments of the Navy. Representative types and uses are: van and stake bed semi-trailers to support loading/unloading of ships and aircraft and movement of materials and equipment for fleet operations; low-bed semi-trailers for transport of construction equipment; tank trailers for transport and dispensing of water, fuel, and hazardous liquids; and semi-trailers for refuse compaction and transport.

COMBAT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT - The equipment included in this program is used by the Naval Construction Forces (NCF) and Naval Beach Group (NBG), and special operating units to provide responsive military construction support to the Navy, Marine Corps, and other forces during military operations, construction of base facilities, and in the conduct of limited defensive operations. These facilities and equipment are vital for maintaining the integrity and sustainability of these units during contingency and wartime operations. Equipment items include: containers, required for pre-packing and secure on-site storage of expensive equipment to expedite mobilization; fuel storage tanks, required for on-site storage of fuel; water purification units, required for camp water treatment systems; water storage tanks, required for water treatment, storage and distribution systems; power distribution panel boards, required for camp electrical distribution systems; tension fabric structures, required for equipment maintenance and company shops.

Item No. 127 Page 1 of 1Exhibit P-40


LINE ITEM606000

IDENT CODE FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

A 20,000

A 8,446

TOTAL 28,446

Reserve Amount 2,303



BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD5: CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAN $5MIL


PROCUREMENT ITEMSSPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT

COMBAT CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

K5XV

Item No. 127 Page 2 of 2 Exhibit P-40aBudget Item Justification Sheet

Date:




QUANTITYCOST (In Millions) 46.810SPARES COST (In Millions)

Other Procurement, Navy/ BA 6, Material Handling Equipment LI 701500/Material Handling Equipment

February 2007


(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 24,603 1,000 46,810 72,413

Reson Funds are Required:The MHE program funds the procurement of Material Handling Equipment to satisfy operational requirements and replaces overaged non-repairable equipment used in material handling operations at world-wide Navy activities. Major using activities include ships, naval magazines, air stations, weapon stations, and overseas support activities such as Sigonella and Sasebo.

The MHE program also funds non-NWCF activities to meet known operational requirements for replacement of equipment which has exceeded its economic life. The overaged equipment is not cost effective to maintain for continued operation, and repair parts are difficult to obtain. Replacement of overaged equipment with new and more efficient models will reduce excessive costs attributed to repair/overhaul, downtime and maintenance. New equipment will enhance productivity and enable stations to meet handling and logistics requirements in an efficient and effective manner.

The requested FY 2007 GWOT funds are required to procure material handling equipment for replacement of deployed equipment and to reset units to required outfitting levels for responding to OPLANS of Major Combat Operations. The requested funds are in support of the Navy Expeditionary units actively involved in GWOT operations. Units include the Naval Construction Force (NCF), Naval Coastal Warfare (NCW), Naval Expeditionary Logistics Support Group (NAVELSG), and the Explosive Ordinance Detachment (EOD). Funds are also requested for the Naval Beach Group (NBG).

BLI No. 701500 Item No. 129 Page 1 of 3Exhibit P-40,


APPROPRIATION Feb 07

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY DOD Exhibit P-5

BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD NO.

BA-6 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUPMENT MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 96W4


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

COST IDENT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

CODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST

REPLACEMENT PROGRAM

W4001 FORKLIFT, GENERAL PURPOSE 305 $45,861

W4001 PLATFORM TRUCKS 2 $949

REPLACEMENT TOTAL PROGRAM 307 $46,810.0

P-1 SHOPP. LIST PAGE NO. UNCLASSIFIED

129 2 of 3 CLASSIFICATION

PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Feb-07EXHIBIT P-5a

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-6 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

LINE ITEM CONTRACT DATE OF SPECS SPEC IF YES,FISCAL METHOD CONTRACTED AWARD FIRST UNIT AVAIL REV. WHEN YEAR CONTRACTOR TYPE BY DATE DEL QTY COST NOW REQ'D AVAIL

FORKLIFT 6,000 LB 1820 (W4001)

FY2007 UNKNOWN CFP DSC PHILADELPHIA 3/07 12/07 4 $79,116 YES

FORKLIFT 10,000 LB 1820 (W4001)

FY 2007 UNKNOWN CFP DSC PHILADELPHIA 3/07 12/07 8 $109,037 YES

FORKLIFT 20,000 LB 1340 (W4001)


FORKLIFT 11,000 LB 1820 (W4001)


FORKLIFT 12,000 LB 1820 (W4001)


FORKLIFT 50,000 LB 1820 (W4001)


PLATFORM TRUCK 25,000 LB 1433 (W4001)


AIRFIELD K-LOADERS

FY 2007 UNKNOWN CFP CNRSWA TBD TBD 2 $1,100,000 YES

P-1 SHOPP. LIST PAGE NO UNCLASSIFIED129 3 of 3 CLASSIFICATION



0204698N


Proc Qty 1Gross Cost 36.6Less PY Adv ProcPlus CY Adv ProcNet Proc (P-1)Initial SparesTotal Proc Cost 36.6Flyaway U/CWpn Sys Proc

March 2007

Other Procurement, Navy/BA-7 BLI: 8106 Command Support Equipment

Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $60,723 $36,639 $115,362 Reason funds are required:Djibouti Coastal Radar Surveillance SystemThe Djibouti Coastal Radar Surveillance System (DCRSS) will fill a Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) gap in the Bab Al Mandeb and Approaches to Djibouti, provide cueing for coalition counter smuggling / counter terrorist Maritime Interception Operations (MIO) and facilitate cooperative self defense.

Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)The installation of dedicated SIPRNET connectivity in NCIS offices, provide improved ability to consume, produce, and disseminate counterintelligence and counterterrorism threat information; installation of dedicated JWICS connectivity in NCIS Field Offices and selected smaller offices, to support access to HUMINT and other intelligence information necessary to protect DON assets; deployment of secure mobile voice capabilities to support timely reporting of threat information from expeditionary OCONUS locations; support for remote SIPRNET connectivity for use in similar environments; additional deployable equipment for use in support of operating forces and Requests for Forces (RFFs); and satellite connectivity for personnel in deployed and expeditionary environments where land-based connectivity is not available. Collectively, these capabilities are critical for successful execution of NCIS missions related to Maritime Domain Awareness and its role in improving overall knowledge of the emerging threat environment and its potential impacts on DON equities and operations.





0204698N


Proc QtyGross Cost 36.6Less PY Adv ProcPlus CY Adv ProcNet Proc (P-1)Initial SparesTotal Proc Cost 36.6Flyaway U/CWpn Sys Proc

March 2007


Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $60,723 $36,639 $115,362 Reason funds are required:Hardware - Techical RefreshementNavy-Marine Corps Mobilization Processing System (NMCMPS) is a peacetime and wartime Manpower and Personnel mission-critical web-based system for Navy Augmentation execution, coordination and management. The goal with NMCMPS and the Continuity of Operations effort is to protect the most data center critical processes and minimize unplanned downtime. The OPN funding requested will provide Continuity of Operationsfunctionality and data recovery in the event of disaster and system disruption It allows administrative, operational and ad-hoc Task Force based Chain-of-Command duty stations direct access via the web to monitor from start to finish the status of their manpower request and personnel augmenting to their command. It uses the most efficient methods for administration, processing and management leveraged from the best technology available and provides information to our Sailors and Civilians, and provides our leaders at all levels in the Navy and Department of Defense (DoD) with accurate, real-time data to make better operation, manpower, personnel and financial decisions. Fully funding the evolved requirements provides end-to-end command visibility and control of integrated mobilization and augmentation processes; from manpower requirement's, sourcing, centralized order writing and detailing, to tracking, accounting, data collection and coordination during recall processing at intermediate bases/duty stations to arrive at duty station via web-based visibility to all vertically and horizontally concerned commands, and to other services, JFCOM, JCS and OSD decision makers.





0204698N



March 2007


Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $60,723 $36,639 $115,362 Reason funds are required:Refresh, Engineering Support, Phones, OSP MAC, ISP MACProcurement of hardware/software for annual computer refresh, equipment procurement for information assurance suite replacement, switch, cabling and procurement in support of outside and inside cable plat upgrades, to relocate crypto to red phones and Voice Over IP Certification/Upgrade, and Equipment procurement in support of Centrix upgrade.

The existing system is insufficient to meet current demand and incapable of providing reliable power for future expansion. The purchase of 4 new XQ-2000 Power Modules would increase the generation capacity of the current power plant to 1.6MW (total reliable of 10240KW). These 4 units will replace the existing XQ-1500 power modules that are only rated at 864KW and are approaching max run time before major overhaul.

Project is to provide increased and collaborative situational awareness in the Southwest Asia, Bahrain administrative and operational environment. The initiative will provide several modes of protection and information with respect to detection, tracking, warning, surveillance, collaboration, response, and notification. The bottom line is a goal to provide increased efficiency and capability for the unique mission needs of the SWA Bahrain region to ensure optimal support of the war fighter.





0204698N



March 2007


Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $60,723 $36,639 $115,362 Reason funds are required:Switchgear, Incinerator, Power Modules, Generators, Emergency managment & NBC Defense Capability PackageRequirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with Switchgear, Incinerator, Power Modules, Generators, Emergency managment & NBC Defense Capability Package. These efforts assist with freeing military master-at-arms (MA) personnel for Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) missions through technology insertion while also providing technologies and capabilities to strengthen OCONUS/CONUS installation force protection and consequence management preparedness, response, and recovery.

The existing switchgear will not meet current power requirements for future development. Current electrical loads have exceeded existing capability in both size and rating. Six 1500KW MUSE generators are currently being overhauled to increase the camp's electrical production capacity to support planned development. To safely connect these 6 MUSE generators to the electrical distribution system a new switchgear is required.

The operation of the current incinerator was a finding of significant concern at the Environmental Quality Assessment (EQA) conducted recently at CLDJ. The currently used “incinerator” is comprised of a large open bin with a forced air system to increase the heat of combustion. Combustion-products are uncontrolled and emitted directly to local atmosphere.





0204698N



March 2007


Narrative Description (Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $60,723 $36,639 $115,362 Reason funds are required:Complete material package to support ROC Level 2, Group 1 (Technician) capability onboard geographically remote forward operating base with no immediate host nation response support and significantly delayed reinforcement by U.S. or Allied forces with an increased Force Protection Conditiondue to Combatant Commander requirements based upon NTTP 3-11.23, NAVFAC 3440.17C, and CNI 3440.17. Material package consists of:- Equipment Installation at Emergency Operations Center- Installation Mass Warning & Notification- Responder Communications suite- Incident Command Post- HAZMAT Response suite- Upgrade of existing Fire & Emergency Services capability- NBC Defense Package

Mobile Range TrainerNSF requires an additional Mobile Firing Range System to support an increase of personnel in Bahrain.Installation has no working mass comms system in place. Limited in emergent voice comms for the installation.



Date: Mar-07 PROGRAM COST BREAKDOWN

Appropriation/Budget Activity P-1 Nomenclature Other Procurement, Navy/BA-7 BLI: 8106 Command Support Equipment

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009COST IDENT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALCODE ELEMENT OF COST CODE QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST

Djibouti Coastal Radar Surveillance System (DCRSS) var 7,100

SIPRNET/JWICS UPGRADE 1 3,761JWICS Guam 1 159

Hardware - Technical Refreshment (IT Infrastructure) 7,919

Computer/Network Refresh 1 500IATO Development/IA Suite Refresh 1 750Network Engineering Support 1 250SPAWAR Program Management 1 639CENTRIX Refresh 1 500Co-Locate Crypto to Red Phones 1 51OSP MAC 1 1,000ISP MAC 1 800VoIP Refresh 1 110

Emergency Management & NBC Defense Capability Package 1 5,300 11 KV High Voltage Primary Switchgear 1 1,500 INCINERATOR 1 1,500

FOUR PRIME POWER MODULES 4 2,800

Mobile Range Trainer 1 2,000

Total 36,639

FY 2007 SUPPLEMENTALExhibit P-5 for Other Procurement, Navy


Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost 25.5

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 25.5

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA-7 Operating Forces Support Equipment: 8118

March 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $15,209 0 $25,500 $48,709

Narrative DescriptionRequirement is requested to address current and anticipated GWOT requirements placed on the Navy’s Installation Protection program. Funding requested addresses OPN requirements associated with Wide Area Alert and Notification (WAAN), Emergency Management Operations Centers, Physical Security Equipment Technology Insertion for MPN replacement and GWOT Collateral Equipment. These efforts assist with freeing military master-at-arms (MA) personnel for Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) missions through technology insertion while also providing technologies and capabilities to strengthen OCONUS/CONUS installation force protection and consequence management preparedness, response, and recovery.

Reason funds are requiredFunds increases the ability to warn and defend against a terrorist attacks further increasing the protection to US Navy assets and personnel. This includes, but is not limited to, Giant voice, telephone notification, computer notification.

Operation Centers: Implementation of operation centers (WOC, ROCs, EOCs) to improve existing capabilities to combat threats associated with the GWOT. Increases capabilities associated with warning, ability to defend, and consequence management.

Access Control and Video Surveillance for GWOT. Includes intrusion detection, closed circuit television and pass & identification functions.

The collateral equipment required to support the upgrade of structural and utilities infrastructures at waterfront areas and to provide facilities to support the homeporting of one nuclear carrier and two nuclear submarines. These mission requirements are in support of GWOT and are essential in providing strategic platforms in Yokosuka JA and Bangor WA. These requirements will provide mission critical shore-side utilities and operational facilities to support war-fighters. This collateral equipment is being programmed to support homeporting of operational units and support elements in light of world events.


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDDATE: Mar-07

P-5 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEADOther Procurement, Navy/BA-7 33.5 Operating Forces Support Equipment

TOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS33.5

COST ELEMENT OF COST ID Prior FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009CODE Code Years 33.5


Emergency Management Operation Centers 2 7,000

GWOT Collateral Equipment - OPNvar

3,400

Physical Security Equipment Technology Insertion var

15,100

2 25,500 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED


N/A


Date:




Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 8.1

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 8.1

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 7 Physical Security Equipment

March 2007

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $139,080 $28,865 $8,116 $176,111 Narrative DescriptionRiverineFunds are required to procure capabilities that will be installed on riverine combatant craft (electro optic systems) and used by individual sailors, as well as on personal and crew-served weapons.

ATFPBiometrics for VBSS Teams - Funding will procure key biometric collection capability (fingerprints and mugshots) against terrorist for maritime interdiction operations (MIO) in support of GWOT. The request also includes barriers and Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) infrastructure.

NAVCENT's persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) plays a major role in developing enhanced battlespace awareness by creating a comprehensive and layered security environment in the Northern Arabian Gulf (NAG) that sets the conditions for maritime commerce.

Funding is for the purchase, installation and maintenance of the Aerostat Satellite System which will be used for the surveillance and reconnaissane missions in the NAG. It will also be used for Maritime Security operations in defense of Iraqi Oil Terminals, specifically two of the larger terminals, Al Basarah Oil Terminal and Khawwr al Amayah Oil Terminal, which combined account for 90% of Iraq's Gross National Product. The system will help in the prevention of terrorist attacks to these terminals and continued protection of stategic and critical Iraqi oil infrastructure.


ID Code



EQUIPMENT

Sponsor: ALL SPONSORS

AT/FP var var 2,997Riverine var var 5,119

N70 Subtotal 0 0 8,116 0 0


EXHIBIT P-5 COST ANALYSIS Weapon System DATEFeb-07

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY/BA 7 Physical Security Equipment

SUBHEAD NO. 87X7

ELEMENT OF COST


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

PAGE 2 of 2 UNCLASSIFIEDP-1 Line Item No 141 CLASSIFICATION:

Prior ToYear Complete

NAVFAC INITIAL SPARES9999 / ROLLING STOCKEnd Item Cost 389,777 CONT 389,777Initial Spares % 7.42% 0% 7.42%Initial Spares Cost 28,922 CONT 28,922BA-5TOTAL NAVFAC INITIAL SPARES 28,922 CONT 28,922TOTAL NAVFAC VENDOR DIRECT SPARES 0 0 0TOTAL NAVFAC SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 28,922 0 28,922

P-1 Shopping List No. 143

DATE:Feb-07

Appropriation (Treasury) Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control Number Weapon System P-1 LINE ITEM NOMENCLATURE

FY 2009 FY 2010

Exhibit P-18 Initial and Replenishment Spares and Repair Parts Justification

FY 2011 Total

1810N OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY BA-8 Spares and Repair Parts BLIN:9020

End Item P-1 Line Item FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

Date:



0206211M Divisions (Marine) A

Prior Years FY 2006FY 2007

Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 48.4

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 48.4

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) AAV7A1 PIP

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 12.427 39.448 48.352 100.227

The AAVC7 Command and Control (C2) Upgrade program is a modification program that will provide an initial operational capability of 7 systems, with improved C2 capability, to the operating forces until the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (Command) (EFV (C)) is fielded. The objective of this program is to upgrade the current AAVC7 communications capability to replicate the EFV (C) communications capability. EFV (C) tactical data network components along with currently fielded GOTS/COTS components will be utilized for the upgrade. This approach will allow fielding of an improved C2 capability in the most expeditious manner while providing a more fluid transition from the current AAVC7 to the EFV (C).

The AAVP7 Variant of the AAV7A1 FOV is an armored assault amphibious full-tracked landing vehicle. Further funding efforts for this variant will be used for product improvements, focused on improving operational capability and RAM.

The AAVR7 Variant of the AAV7A1 FOV is the primary maintenance and recovery vehicle. Further funding efforts for this variant will be used for product improvements, focused on improving operational capability and RAM.

Tool Sets and Tool Kits for AAV: Gunner’s Quadrant with case is a portable precision leveling instrument used for measuring the leveling or depression angles of artillery weapons. It is also used for checking the adjustments of elevating mechanisms and checking accuracy of the sighting and fire control equipment.

Reason funds are required: To support Operation Iraqi Freedom and restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war levels.Impact if funds are not provided: If the recovery variant is not funded, completion of RAM/RS of the remaining recovery vehicles would be degraded and the vehicles would not be returned to pre-war condition. If the tool kits and test kit are not funded, there will be a degradation of repairs for fire suppression systems in the vehicles.



Date:

Exhibit P-40a, Budget Item Justification for Aggregated ItemsAppropriation / Budget Activity P-1 Item Nomenclature:

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2)

Procurement Items Code UOM Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Prog

TOOL SETS AND TOOL KITS FOR AAV A D 0.4

Q 6

Totals 0.4

AAV7A1 PIP

February 2007

BLI No. 202100 Item No. 1 Page 2 of 5Exhibit P-40a,

Budget Item Justification for Aggregated Items

Exhibit P-5, Appropriation/ Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: Weapon System Type: Date:

Cost Analysis

ID PRIOR YRSCD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost

$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $

AAVC7 22000 10 2200000

AAVP7 11500 Var Var

AAVR7 14437 Var Var

TOTAL 47937ACTIVE 47937RESERVE

FY 09

February 2007AAV7A1 PIPProcurement, Marine Corps (1109)/Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2)

FY 06 FY 07 FY08Weapon System Cost Elements

BLI No. 202100 Item No. 1 Page 3 of 5

Exhibit P-5, Cost Analysis

Date:

Exhibit P-5a, Budget Procurement History and Planning Appropriation / Budget Activity/Serial No: Weapon System Type: P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:

WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and LocationContract Method Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit Cost

Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date

Fiscal Years and Type Delivery Each $ Avail

AAVC7FY 2007 VARIOUS TBD MCSC Aug-07 May-08 10 2200000 YES N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) AAV7A1 PIP

February 2007

REMARKS: AAVC7 C2 Upgrade kits will be procured by the prime integrator and installed at various field locations. This funding will build/field the second increment of 10 upgraded C7s. AAVP7 effort will include survivability upgrades (underbody armor, aux weapons mount, armored ammo box, etc.).

BLI No. 202100 Item No. 1 Page 4 of 5Exhibit P-5A,

Procurement History and Planning

ITEM

AAVC7

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 10 10 A 10

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 10 10 2 2 2 2 2 0

AAVC7ITEM

9

Fiscal Year 07

MAX

Weapon System

VARIOUS

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2)

TBD

Manufacturer's NAME / LOCATIONUnit of MeasureTOTAL

Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

AAV7A1 PIPPROCUREMENT LEADTIMESPRODUCTION RATE

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

BALANCE

TBD

Calendar Year 06 Calendar Year 07

E19

Date:February 2007

FY 08/09 BUDGET EXHIBIT P-21, PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

TBD 10

ECONMSR

Appropriation Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control No. P-1 Item Nomenclature:

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEMAAVC7

Fiscal Year 08 Fiscal Year 09

Fiscal Year 06

BLI No. 202100 Item No. 1 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule

Date:



0206211M Divisions (Marine)

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) M1A1 Firepower Enhancement

February 2007

M1A1 Firepower Enhancement: The Improved Loaders Weapon Station is an effort to enhance the current firepower of the loader's machine gun by providing a secure remotely operated platform. This will increase the accuracy of the weapon as well as the area effectively covered by its fire. Additionally, the survivability of the loader will be greatly enhanced. The current system requires the loader to expose himself to enemy fire in order to operate his machine gun. The new design will give the loader a remote screen that will enable him to remain safely under armor while he employs his weapon.

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 19.003 1.154 4.470 24.627

Reason funds are required: These funds are required to maintain current asset posture in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Currently, there is no method to test and fault-isolate FEP components, resulting in unacceptable equipment downtime. It is imperative to procure the necessary test equipment to augment currently fielded test equipment to allow technicians to fault-isolate and quickly repair components. Impact if funds are not provided: Operational readiness, tactical advantage, far target location, and employment of the main and secondary armament is severely degraded. This significantly decreases the firepower available to the maneuver element commander. Procurement of the necessary ancillary tools and test equipment will greatly reduce the time required to return the M1A1 Tank to a mission ready status.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2)


M1A1 Firepower Enhancement A D 4.5

Q 15

Totals 4.5

M1A1 Firepower Enhancement

February 2007



Date:



0206211M A


Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) Weapons Enhancement Program (220800)

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total $16.798 $ 2.703 $21.170 $40.671

Grip Pod - The purpose of the Grip Pod is to provide the Infantry Marine with vertical hand-grips possessing folding, extendable, removable bipods to be mounted on the Modular Weapon System via the M1913 rail.

Mount - Provides a vehicle mount for the M240 G/B that allows the gunner to rapidly & accurately engage targets, and maintain positive retention of box ammunition while on the move and during engagements. The weapon cannot be properly mounted and employed from current vehicle mounts.

Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote - The VLAD-RDD is a multiple-use device which will allow Marines to remotely deploy the current VLAD nets. Currently, Marines must manually pull the nets across roadways while attempting to stop suspect vehicles and, in doing so, place themselves in harms way.

Reason funds are required: Funds are required to fund restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level and training, equipment and housing for FSRG units and capabilities.Impact if funds are not provided: Marines deployed in support of OIF will lack sufficient checkpoint and vehicle search capability as well as non-lethal capabilities.



Date:




Mounts A D 3.009

Subtotal 3.009

Weapons Enhancement Program (220800)

February 2007




Cost Analysis



FY07 SupplementalGrip Pod A 11231 97663 115Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote A 6930 252 27500


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles Weapons Enhancement Program February 2007

Weapon System Cost Elements FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09


Exhibit P-5,Cost Analysis

Date:


WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and Location Contract Method

Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit Cost Specs Avail?

Date Revsn RFP Issue Date


FY07 Supplemental Grip Pod US Tactical Supply FP MCSC, Quantico, VA Aug-07 Mar-08 97663 115 Yes N/A N/A

Albany, GAVehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote TBD FP MCSC, Quantico, VA Sep-07 Dec-07 252 27500 Yes N/A N/A

February 2007

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA 2Weapons and Combat Vehicles Weapons Enhancement Program (220800)


Exhibit P-5a,Budget Procurement History and Planning

ITEM

Grip Pod

Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 97663 97663 AFY07 MC 252 252 A

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 97663 97663 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8138 8145

FY07 MC 252 252 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote

14


Fiscal Year 09

80 100

Date:February 2007

Grip PodVehicle Lightweight Arresting Device - Remote

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

Each

11

Unit of MeasureTOTAL

Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

3

Appropriation Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control No.

17

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Weapons Enhancement Program

Weapon System

US Tactical Albany, GA

BALANCE

FY 07 BUDGET EXHIBIT P-21, PRODUCTION SCHEDULE


2000 8000 10000 10

EachTBD

PROCUREMENT LEADTIMESPRODUCTION RATE

Manufacturer's NAME / LOCATION

20

7

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

Grip Pod

BLI No. 220800 Item No. Page 5 of 5 Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule

Date:



0502511M Divisions (MCR) B


Supplelmental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 20.6

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 20.6

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 5.500 215.350 20.571 241.421 USMC HIMARS is a C-130 transportable, wheeled, indirect fire, rocket/missile system capable of firing all rockets and missiles in the current and future Multiple Launch Rocket System Family of Munitions (MFOM). The system includes a launcher, two Re-Supply Systems (RSS) and the MFOM. An RSS consists of a Re-Supply Vehicle (Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement (MTVR) based truck with Material Handling Equipment) and Re-Supply Trailer. The MFOM is a family of rockets and missiles capable of attacking a variety of tactical and operational targets, providing the requisite range and lethality to support maneuver commanders. HIMARS will provide the Fleet Marine Force with 24-hour ground-based, responsive General Support/General Support Reinforcing (GS/GSR) indirect fires which accurately engage targets at long range (60+KM) with high volumes of lethal fire under all weather conditions throughout all phases of combat operations ashore including irregular warfare and distributed operations. HIMARS is a significant improvement over currently fielded ground fire support systems. During a 24-hour period the system will be expected to conduct multiple moves and complete multiple fire missions. HIMARS will satisfy the Marine Corps requirement for an indirect fire system that is responsive, maneuverable, and capable of engaging targets at long range. High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) Rockets are procured training and tactical munitions per the USMC HIMARS Total Munitions Requirement (TMR). The training munitions are the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Reduced Range Practice Rocket (RRPR). The rocket has an inert payload section with a blunt nose for inducing reduced range for use at multiple ranges in CONUS. The tactical munitions are the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) rocket. The GMLRS integrates a guidance and control package and a new rocket motor to achieve greater range and precision accuracy resulting in reduced logistics footprint for deployed forces. GMLRS is effective against counter fire, air defense, light material, personnel targets and provides greater range and significantly enhanced accuracy.

Reason funds are required: Funding is required for urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment, to replace in-theater equipment that has exceeded service life and to support combat operations, force protection and replacement of equipment items. Impact if funds are not provided: HIMARS Launcher Systems – Unable to provide HIMARS operational capability needed for 24 hour, ground-based, long-range precision fires, with low collateral damage, to fully support operations in theater. Additionally, there will be no training assets for the Supporting Establishment to train Marines prior to deployment.GMLRS – Unable to field precision munitions providing maximum lethality with minimal collateral damage in support of current operations and the GWOT.Re-Supply System Armor Kits – Unable to deploy Re-Supply System in support of GWOT. This is a JROC force protection requirement for enhanced personnel survivability to those systems that may be employed in an asymmetric threat environment.




Cost Analysis



M31 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System 20571 30 685714


Weapon System Cost Elements

FY 09

February 2007High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109)/Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2)

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08



Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


Tactical Munitions Systems (GMLRS M31) Lockheed-Martin, Dallas TX SS-FFP Huntsville, AL Jun-07 Nov-08 30 685714

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

GMLRS

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

2007 MC 30 30 A 30

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

2007 MC 30 30 15 15

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM



17

BALANCE



7 42 83 8


25

P-1 Item Nomenclature:High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)

Weapon System

Lockheed Martin, Dallas Texas


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

Date:February 2007

GMLRS Accelerated Supplemental

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E


Fiscal Year 09

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

GMLRS Accelerated Supplemental


Date:





Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles (2) Weapons and Combat Vehicles Under $5M (222000)

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total $3.444 $122.493 $16.162 $142.099

Boresight, Optical - The M115 Boresight is used for boresighting (identifying corrosion, pits, cracks, and other discontinuities) in the 60mm light weight company mortar. The boresight attaches over the end of the mortarbarrel during the boresighting process.Carbine, MWS, 5.56MM - The M4 Carbine replaces the M3 submachine gun, slect M9 pistols, and M16A2 rifles for unit leaders, crew served gunners, vehicle crews, radio operators, light infantry, airborne/air assault, combat engineers and others.M203 Gernade Launcher - The M203 Gernade Launcher is a breech-loading, pump action, single shot gernade launcher. It is compact, lightweight, and has the ability to fire several types of 40mm ammunition, including High Explosive (HE), Smole, Illumination, tactical CS (teargas), multi-projectile, and practice rounds. In the mid-1970s, the M203 replaced the M79 44mm stand-alone gernade launcher.M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) - The M249 SAW is a belt-fed, fully automatic machine gun that is fielded in the USMC infantry fire team and to other billets that require a light machine gun capabilty. The SAW was fielded in the fire team in 1985 as a replacement for the M16A1 carroed by the automatic rifleman. The SAW is manufactured by Fabrique Nationale.



Date:




Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles (2) Weapons and Combat Vehicles Under $5M (222000)

February 2007

M2 50 Cal Heavy Machine Gun - The M2 .50 caliber Machine Gun, is the heavy machine gun of the Marine Corps. It is an automatic, belt-fed, recoil operated, air-cooled, crew-operated machine gun. The M2 is crew transportable with limited amounts of ammunition over short distances. This gun has a back plate with spade grips, trigger, and bolt latch release. The gun is equipped with a leaf-type rear sight, flash suppressor and a spare barrel assembly. A disintegrating metallic link-belt is used to feed the ammunition into the weapon. M240B 7.62mm Machine Gun - The M240 is the medium machine gun of the Marine Corps. It is an automatic, 7.62mm, belt fed, gas operated, air cooled, crew-served, fixed head space weapon.MK19 40mm Machine Gun - The MK-19 Grenade Launcher is a fully automatic weapon that fires 40mm grenades. The MK19 can be mounted on a tripod or a vehicle swivel point. The weapon delivers accurate, intense, decisive firepower against personnel and lightly armored vehicles by shooting a variety of 40mm grenades. Because of its weight, it is crew transportable only over short distances with limited amounts of ammunition. The MK19 Mod 3 shoots a 40mm grenade, which can penetrate two inches of armor. Mortars, 60mm LWCMS and Medium, 81mm Extended Range - These mortars provide responsive, all-weather, organic, indirect fire support to the company and battalion commanders of the Ground Combat Element in support of offensive and defensive operations and maneuvers.Machine Gun Mounts - The M122A1 machine gun tripods will be used with M240B machine guns in the ground mount role. The M3 machine gun tripods will be used with M2 .50 cal machine guns and MK19 MOD3 machine guns. The MK 93 Machine Gun Mount supports the M2 .50 cal machine gun and the MK19 Mod 3 and provides an interface between the weapon system and vehicl assets.M9 Pistols - The M9 is a lightweight, semiautomatic pistol that was designed to replace the M1911A1 .45 caliber pistol and .38 caliber revolvers. The M9A1 design includes an integrated mounting rail on the receiver that allows for the attachment of high intensity lights and laser aiming devices. The M9 and the M9A1 are manufactured by Berretta.Sniper Rifle, 7.62mm - The M40A3 is a Marine Corps designed, bolt-action, 7.62mm sniper rifle. The M40A3 is capable of one minute of angle accuracy up to a maximum effective range of 1000 yards. Each M40A3 is custom built at Precision Weapons Section, Weapons Training Battalion, Quantico.Special Application Scoped Rifle (M107) - The M107 SASR is a semi-automatic, magazine fed, .50 caliber rifle. The M107 is an upgrade to the M82A3. It is one of the weapons used by Marine Corps sniper teams. The M107 is manufactured by Barrett Industries.Shotgun, 12 Gauge Combat - The M1014 is a compact and fast-firing semiautomatic shotgun/scattergun. It is capable of accepting either 2 ¾” or 3” magnum shells. The Joint Service Combat Shotgun was acquired in response to the need for a more reliable shotgun to replace several older variants in service at the time. The M1014 is manufactured by Benelli.Sight, Bore, Mortar, w/ Case - The M45 Mortar Boresight is used for boresighting the 81mm mortar. The boresight is attached over the mortar barrel with the strap during the boresighting process.Test Set, Boresight Collimator - Boresight collimators are diagnostic tools designed to align (center) an optical device at a pre-set distance with the cannon, barrel, or tube of a weapon system. Boresight collimators are used by Electro-Optical Ordnance Repairman (MOS 2171).Tool Kits - These tool kits are comprised of special tools and gages used by maintenance personnel to inspect, repair and replace parts on various weapon systems.

Reason funds are required: Additional weapons are required to field to new battalions which are in the process of standing up in support of OIF.Impact if not funded: Insufficient quantities of weapons will be available to Marines in the new battalions.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles (2)


Optical Boresight A D 0.024

Q

Carbine, MWS (M4) A D 0.360

Q

M203 Grenade Launcher A D 0.886

Q

M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) A D 1.551

Q

Machine Gun, .50 Cal (M2) A D 1.433

Q

Machine Gun, Medium, 7.62mm (M240) A D 1.710

Q

Machine Gun, 40mm (MK 19) A D 1.287

Q

Mortar, 60mm, LWCMS A D 1.509

Q

Mortar, Medium, 81mm, Extended Range A D 2.926

Q

Machine Gun Mounts A D 0.945

Q

Subtotals 12.631

Weapons and Combat Vehicles Under $5M (222000)

February 2007



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles (2)


Pistol, 9mm, Semiautomatic A D 0.621

Q

Rifle, Sniper, 7.62mm A D 0.146

Q

Special Application Scoped Rifle (M107) A D 0.250

Q

Shotgun, Combat A D 0.055

Q

Bore Sight, Mortar, w/ Case A D 0.008

Q

Test Set, Boresight Collimator A D 0.080

Q

Tool Kits A D 0.108

Q

M32 Multi Shot Grenade Launcher A D 2.263

Subtotal (this page) 3.531

Subtotal (Page 1) 12.631

Totals for P-40a 16.162

Weapons and Combat Vehicles Under $5M (222000)

February 2007



Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Weapons and Combat Vehicles (2) Modular Weapon System (233400)

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification:

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $0.0 $51.590 $2.589 $54.179

Modular Weapon System

The Modular Weapon System (MWS) is a program consisting of two main variants of the M16 Family of Rifles. They are the M16A4 rifle and the M4/M4A1 carbine. The MWS consists of a rifle/carbine that has been modified by building into the design a military-standard rail in place of the integral carry handle/sight to permit quick mounting of various night/day/thermal sights. Additionally, hand guards with rails are attached to the barrel assembly to mount various accessories such as a modified M203 grenade launching system, flashlights and infrared (IR) laser pointers and other such devices. The MWS reduces the number of components required to attach accessories and allows configuration management at the operator level vice the current second and third echelons of maintenance.

Reason funds are required: The requirement for the M4 and M16A4 have approximately doubled. The fielding of the M4 will be vastly expanded in order to provide rifles to Marines that traditionally carried longer rifles or pistols. This change reflects the realities of modern war where all Marines are likely to engage in combat and many Marines require a more portable weapon. The fielding of the M16A4 will be vastly expanded in order to provide M16A4s (which are capable of mounting various optical devices) to Marines that traditionally carried older, less capable weapons such as the M16A2.

Impact if funds are not provided: If not funded, Marines deployed in support of OIF will lack a proven capability for operations prevalent in the theater of operations.



Date:



Procurement Items Code UOM Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 To Complete Total Prog

M16A4 Rifles w/ Rail Adapter System (RAS) A D 2.6

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

Totals 2.6

Modular Weapon System (233400)

February 2007



Date:



0206211M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Guided Missiles and Equipment (3) Javelin (301100)

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification:Procures new Block 1 Javelin Command Launch Units (CLUs).The Javelin System is a man-portable, fire-and-forget, medium-range antitank weapon system consisting of the Command Launch Unit (CLU) and Tactical Round. The CLU's Imaging Infrared (I2R) system is used to detect targets during conditions of poor visibility and night operations. The Round consists of the fire-and-forgetmissile and the discardable Launch Tube Assembly (LTA). The fire-and-forget capability increases the gunner's ability to immediately take cover. (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total

0.0 46.500 1.200 47.700

Reason funds are required: Funds are required to procure Javelin Block 1 missiles and Javelin Block 1 Upgrades to the Command Launch Units and fund restoration of MC unit capability to pre-war level.Impact if funds are not provided: If not funded the Javelin will not receive technological upgrades to the missiles and launch units. Marines deployed in support of OIF will lack a proven capability for operations prevalent in that theater of operations.




Cost Analysis Javelin



JAVELIN

Command Launch Unit (Block 1) 918 6 153000

Govt Engineering Services 169

Govt Program Management 113


FY 09

February 2007Javelin (301100)Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Guided Missiles and Equipment (3)

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08Weapon System Cost Elements



Date:


WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and LocationContract Method

Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit CostSpecs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07

Javelin Block 1 CLU Javelin Joint Venture, Tucson, AZ FFP CCWS, Redstone Arsenal, AL Mar-07 Mar-09 6 153000 Y Dec-06

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Guided Missiles and Equipment (3)

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

Javelin Blovk 1 CLU Upgrade

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 6 6 A 6

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 6 6 6

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

Javelin Block 1 CLU Upgrade


Fiscal Year 09

Date:February 2007

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

EACH


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX


29

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Javelin (301100)Javelin

Weapon System

Javelin Joint Venture, Tucson, AZ

BALANCE



TBD TBD TBD 5



24

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

Javelin Block 1 CLU Upgrade


Date:



0206623M A


Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 34.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 34.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 34.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Guided Missiles and Equipment (3) Missile Mods (312300)

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification:Procures additional M41 Improved Target Acquisition Systems (ITAS) and associated support and training equipment toward fulfilling the AAO. The ITAS is an organic system that provides long range, lethal anti-armor fire to the anti-armor sections in the infantry and tank battalions. In its primary anti-tank role, AAWS-H will be used to destroy main battle tanks and other armored vehicles before the firepower and shock action of enemy armor can be brought to bear on Marine formations. In its secondary role, the ITAS is employed against vehicles and field fortifications of any type. Additionally, the funding procures the TOW-BB (Bunker Buster) missiles to replace OIF expenditures.


Reason funds are required: Funds are required to restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war levels.

Impact if funds are not provided: If funds are not provided the Marine Corps will lack a valuable bunker buster tool currently in use in combat operations against fortifications in OIF.




Cost AnalysisAAWS-H



M41 ITAS 9360 16 585008



TOW-2B Aero Missiles 23650 550 43000



`


FY 09

February 2007Missile Modifications (312300)Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Guided Missiles and Equipment (3)




Date:


AAWS-H


Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07

- M41 ITAS Raytheon, McKinney, TX FFP CCWS, Redstone Arsenal, AL Mar-07 Jan-10 16 585008 Y Nov-06

- TOW-2B Aero Missiles Raytheon, Tucson, AZ FFP CCWS, Redstone Arsenal, AL Mar-07 Feb-09 550 43000 Y Nov-06

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / guided Missiles and Equipment (3) Missile Modifications (312300)

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

M41 ITAS

TOW-BB Missiles

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 16 16 A 16

07 MC 550 550 A 550

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 16 16 16

07 MC 550 550 550TOW-2B Aero Missiles

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM

Raytheon, Tucson, AZ



100

34

BALANCE



10 33 40 5

EACH


39

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Missile Modifications (312300)AAWS-H

Weapon System

Raytheon, McKinney, TX

TOW-2B Aero Missiles


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

23

Date:February 2007

M41 ITAS

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

EACH

5 28


Fiscal Year 09

250 350

REMARKS: The 550 is a lot delivery.


BALANCE

ITEM

M41 ITAS


ITEM

M41 ITAS

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 16 16 16

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM


Fiscal Year 13

Date:February 2007

M41 ITAS

Fiscal Year 11

ECONMSR

EACH


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX


39

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Missile Modifications (312300)AAWS-H

Weapon System

Raytheon, McKinney, TX

BALANCE



10 33 40 5



34

ITEM

Fiscal Year 10

Fiscal Year 12


Date:



0206313M Marine Corps Communication Equipment A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronic Equipment 4181 - REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justifications: (Dollars in Millions) FY2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 13.022 96.609 5.214 114.855 General Purpose Electronic Test Equipment (GPETE): Items are required to support USMC weapon systems that utilze or consist of electronic components. GPETE is essential to the operational readiness of the Marine Corps for the installation, operation, and maintenance (preventive and routine) of electronic weapon systems and equipment in both the USMC operating forces as well as the supporting establishment (Schools and Bases)General Purpose Tool, Sets & Kits (TS&K) are tools to support all types of Marine Corps ground equipment. The program includes over 40 different types of individual mechanic or technician tool kits as well as the larger, mobile or deployable, organizational tool sets. Third Echelon Test System (TETS): The TETS program provides mobile automatic testing on line replaceable units and circuit card assemblies, enabling rapid restoration of weapon systems. The system consists of hardware and software portable equipment, which is used by maintenance personnel in the troubleshooting of digital/analog, communication/electronic, electro-mechanical, and electro-optical equipment.Automatic Test Equipment (ATE) provides dynamic testing and diagnostic capabilities to Marine Corps ground weapons. General purpose ATE allows one tester tosupport testing of digital/analog, communication electronics, electro-mechanical, and electro-optical assemblies and subassemblies. APSs are used for specific weapon systems to test the assembly as if it were installed and operating in the weapon platform. Reason funds are required: Funds are required to fund equipment necessary to outfit and stand up MarSoc units, restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level, fund training, equipment and housing for FSRG units and capabilities and fund support combat operations, force protection and replacement of equipment items.Impact if funds are not provided: These kits, tools, and sets are essential to the operational readiness of the Marine Corps in order to provide tools to support Marine Corps ground equipment deployed in OIF. Without these funds, the Marine Corps will be unable to support pre-combat technical inspections and repair of infantry weapons, armor, artillery, missile systems, communications equipment, computers, chemical-biological-radiological and nuclear detection equipment, and engineer and motor transport deployed to OIF.



Date:


Procurement Items Code Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 To Complete Total Prog

General Purpose Mechanical Test Equipment D 2.6

Q VAR

SHOP EQUIP, CONTACT MAINT D 0.180

Q VAR

VARIOUS SHOP EQUIPMENT SETS, TEST SETS AND TOOL KITS D 1.094

Q VAR

VARIOUS TEST SETS, TOOL KITS, DEGREASER AND OSCILLOSCOPE D 1.301

G VAR

5.2

4181 - REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENTProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4)

February 2007



Date:



0206313M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER

February 2007

The Combat Operations Center (COC) is a deployable, self-contained, and centralized facility which provides digital, shared Command and Control/Situational Awareness functionalities to enhance the Common Operational Picture (COP) for the Command Element, Ground Command Element, Air Combat Element, and Combat Service Support Element. It is a commercial off-the-shelf based, total turn-key, integrated hardware solution using unit provided radios, legacy, re-hosted tactical data systems, and available prime movers that provides the Marines mobility, modularity, and scalability. The COC is the foundation of USMC C2, meeting communications and network requirements in the near term, and will continue spiral development as it evolves into a full, integrated MAGTF C2 capability by 2015. COC systems are currently being employed in the Global War on Terror (GWOT).

FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY 2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 1.247 267.2 57.1 325.547

Reason funds are required: The COC program requires funding to procure 153 COC systems, of which 50 are Capability Set 3 and 103 are Capability Set 4. These procurement activities for COC systems will be delivered to OIF.Impact if funds are not provided: The Marines in theater will not be able to adequately utilize the enhanced war fighting capabilities made possible by this system, resulting in degraded decision making and less than optimal utilization of forces.Failure to fund the COC will directly affect the Marine Corps’ ability to support OIF. The additional systems will allow Marine units to meet the requirements for pre-deployment Training Package at Mojave Viper/TECOM ensuring they are fully prepared to conduct Command & Control in OIF. Additionally, these systems will allow each Battalion and Regiment deploying to OIF the ability to train and become proficient in digital Command & Control in CONUS, prior to actual combat operations. Failure to receive the additional funds will result in a gradual decrease in the operational availability in OIF as well as a decline in their interoperability and technological refresh.




Cost Analysis



COC CAPSETSCOC CAPSET II 37600 6 6266667

COC CAPSET III 4200 2 2100000

COC CAPSET IV 15300 9 1700000


FY 09

February 2007COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTERProcurement, Marine Corps (1109)/Communications and Electronics Equipment (4)




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07

COC CAPSET II General Dynamics Scottsdale,AZ FFP Scottsdale, AZ Jul-07 Feb-08 6 6266667 N N N/ACOC CAPSET III General Dynamics Scottsdale,AZ FFP Scottsdale, AZ Jul-07 Feb-08 2 2100000 N N N/ACOC CAPSET IV General Dynamics Scottsdale,AZ FFP Scottsdale, AZ Jul-07 Mar-08 9 1700000 N N N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

COC CAPSET II

COC CAPSET III

COC CAPSET IV

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 6 6 A 607 MC 2 2 A 207 MC 9 9 A 9

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 6 3 307 MC 2 207 MC 9 3 3 3


BALANCE

ITEMCOC CAPSET IICOC CAPSET IIICOC CAPSET IV

18


Fiscal Year 09

3 13

3 13

Date:February 2007

COC CAPSET IICOC CAPSET III

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSRUnit of MeasureTOTAL

Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

18


18

P-1 Item Nomenclature:COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER

Weapon System

General Dynamics, Scottsdale, AZ

BALANCE


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4)

2 2

19 19





18

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

COC CAPSET IV


Date:



0206313M A


Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.631

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.631

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.631

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY2007 FY2007 FY2007Budget Title IX Supplemental Total78.044 40.162 27.631 145.837

WORKSTATIONS, SERVERS, LAPTOPS AND PRINTERS: In order to alleviate increasing Operational and Personnel tempo, the Marine Corps is expanding by three battalions, one Regimental Headquarters and various enabling units. Requested funding ($3.130 million) would support additional computers, servers and printersto initially outfit the new units. The request would procure 964 workstations (including laptop computers and desktop workstations), 7 servers and 60 printers.

Reason Funds are required: Funds are required to procure additional equipment in support of the requirements and equipment to set up three Battalions. Impact if not provided: Required initial outfitting equipment items would not be procured.

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) // Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) 4630 - COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES

MCNOSC AGGRESSIVE CND: Although details are classified, there exists today, a very real potential for our enemies to conduct successful asymmetric global attacks against Marine Corps communication systems as demonstrated during recent NSA and USMC assessments of USMC networks. Provides intrusion detection & computer network defense, S/W & H/W upgrades ISO Stratcom Global C2 mission & MARFORSTRAT mission. Request due to increased threat of attack to our networks

February 2007




Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /


Q

MCNOSC Aggressive CND A D 0.930

Battalions Printers A D 0.034

Battalions Workstations A D 2.196

Battalions Servers A D 0.118

Battalion Enablers A D 0.781

Totals 4.059

4630 - COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES

February 2007


Exhibit P-40a,Budget Item Justification for Aggregated Items


Exhibit P-5, Appropria Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) // Communications and Electronics Equipment (4 P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: Weapon System Type: Date:

Cost Analysis



MCHS Worksuites, Servers, and Laptops 23,572 VAR VAR

TOTAL 23,572ACTIVE 23,572RESERVE

FY 09

February 2007COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES





Date:



0206313M Marine Corps Communication Equipment B

($M) Prior Years FY 2006FY 2007


Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 18.1

Initial Spares (5%)


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

February 2007

Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA) refers to the Marine Corps' situational awareness systems. The Marine Corps currently has four pieces of equipment in the Blue Force Situational Awareness portfolio. The Mounted Data Automated Communications Terminal (M-DACT) and Dismounted Data Automated Communications Terminal (D-DACT) are programs of record and the Force Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Blue Force Tracker (BFT) and Mini Transmitter (MTX) are non-program of record assets used in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC) missions, respectively.

The DDACT is the Marine Corps' Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA) hand-held program of record. It is a tactical input/output battlefield Situational Awareness (SA) system and communicates via terrestrial communication devices resident in the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. It supports Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) through the transmission of digitized Position Location Information (PLI) and provides the ability to transmit, receive, create, modify, and display map overlays and commander's critical information requirements. It also allows the users to exchange information using pre-formatted and free text messaging. It exchanges information with other D-DACTs and M-DACTs. The D-DACT consists of the Rugged Personal Digital Assistant (R-PDA) with enhanced battery life and uses the Windows Command and Control Compact Edition (C2Ce) software.

Target Location Design Hand-Off System (TLDHS): StrikeLink is a Joint Fires/Combined Arms tool that allows observers to control CAS, Artillery and Naval Gunfire missions on a single system. TLDHS is a modular, manportable equipment suite that provides the ability to quickly acquire targets in day, night, and near-all-weather visibility conditions. Operators will be able to accurately determine and display their own location, the location of friendly forces and targets, as well as digitally transmit (hand-off) data to supporting arms elements, and designate targets for laser-seeking Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) and Laser Spot Trackers (LSTs). This supplemental will procure 264 TLDHS systems for Forward Air Controllers, Forward Observers and ANGLICO teams and provide urgently needed equipment critical to mission accomplishment and fratricide prevention in support support of OIF and the GWOT. FY07 Expanded supplemental will procure an additional 40 TLDHS systems.

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronic Equipment (4) Command Post Systems

The MDACT is the Marine Corps' Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA) vehicle mounted program of record. It is a tactical input/output battlefield Situational Awareness (SA) system and communicates via terrestrial communication devices resident in the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. It supports Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) through the transmission of digitized Position Location Information (PLI) and provides the ability to transmit, receive, create, modify, and display map overlays and commander's critical information requirements. It also allows the users to exchange information using pre-formatted and free text messaging. It exchanges information with other C2 systems and populates the Common Operating Picute. The M-DACT solution consists of the Rugged Handheld Computer operating Command & Control Personal Computer (C2PC) software.



Date:




February 2007

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronic Equipment (4) Command Post Systems

IOS-OPS: The Intelligence Operations Workstation is the TCO server hardware platform that employs GCCS-J software.

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007Budget Title IX Supplemental Total19.662 102.357 18.083 140.102

Reason funds are required: FY 2007 Supplemental Funds are required to provide urgently needed equipment critical to mission accomplishment is support of OIF. The additional FBCB2/BFT systems are required to replace combat loss assets as the US Army closes the theater Turn In Point (TIP) on 1 Oct 06 and places the responsibility of system replacement with organic support infrastructure; for USMC FBCB2/BFT systems, the organic support infrastructure is the MCSC FBCB2/BFT Project Office through FY 2007. The additional FBCB2/BFT mounts are required to facilitate the integration of the FBCB2/BFT V-4 and backpack variants in the MTVR and to facilitate the reassignment of FBCB2/BFT devices to other HMMWV variants. Additionally, mounts are required to relocate the MT2011 transceiver from the rear to the front of vehicles to allow interoperability of FBCB2/BFT and Chameleon Jammer. The DACT systems are required to provide Position Location Information (PLI) of units to populate the Common Tactical Picture (CTP)/COP and are critical to providing command and control of operating units from the Platoon down to the Squad level.The C2PC effort addresses C2 systems interoperability challenges with the cross attachment of Marine Corps and Army units in OIF and functionality of legacy USMC C2 systems. It funds fixes to the Marine Corps commanThe TLDHS allows Forward Air Controllers (FAC) and Forward Observers (FO) to accurately designate targets and recognize target location and the location of friendly forces. Through the use and plotting of observer locat

Intelligence Operations Workstation (IOW) is the TCO client hardware platform for deployment of COTS, GOTS, C2PC and associated injector software. Expanded supplemental will procure three suites (10 units, two in each suite) under the 4.1architecture, for new Infantry Battalion.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications and Electronic Equipment (4)


DDACT A D 2.0

Q

IOW (TCO) A D 0.4

Q

TARGET LOCATION, DESIGNATION AND HANDOFF SYSTEM A D 1.0

Q

IOS - OPS A D 0.1

Q

MDACT/MRC MOUNTS A D 4.5

Q

Totals 8.1

Command Post Systems

February 2007



Exhibit P-5, Appropriation/ Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: DDACT/MDACT Weapon System Type: Date:

Cost Analysis



BFSA 10000 VAR VAR



FY 09

February 2007Command Post SystemsProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronic Equipment (4)

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08



Date:



0206313M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Comminications and Electronics Equipment (4) RADIO SYSTEMS

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 21.827 854.719 299.278 1175.824

GBS - Global Broadcast Service is a smart-push user-pull satellite communications system that will provide large volumes of information to depolyed, OTM or garrison forces. Receive suites will receive and disseminate global broadcasts, at up to 23 mbps, of classified and unclassified standard information products.

The AN/VRC-90 is a long-range, vehicle-mounted radio set with a securable transceiver intended for VHF-FM tactical operations. The AN/VRC-90 is used where the communications range must normally operate over long distances (up to 35 kilometers).

The AN/VRC-92 is a vehicle-mounted, dual-radio configuration consisting of two long-range, solid-state, securable transceivers intended for VHF-FM tactical operations. In the photo to the right, a SINCGARS retrans has been installed in an S-250 shelter, well-equipped with an M-249 SAW, Global Positioning System, AN/GRC-193, AN/PSC-5, two AN/VRC-92s, AN/PRC-119, two power supplies and a multimeter.

Amphib Installs- Equips (24) naval amphibious ships with the current HF radios technology - utilizing automatic link establishment (ALE). Without this new HF capability, shipboard HF communication systems are incompativle with the Marine Corps newly-modernized tactical radio inventory. Lightweight Multi Band Satellite Terminal (LMST) is a USAF developed, transit case, tri-band, satellite terminal procured by the USMC via a contract managed by the US Army Project Manager Warfighter Information Network – Tactical (PM WIN-T).



Date:



0206313M


February 2007

Navigation set, Defense Advanced GPS Receiver (DAGR) replaces the Precision Lightweight GPS Receiver (PLGR), AN/PSN-11 and AN/PSN-11(V)1 to become the new standard handheld GPS Ground Tactical Receiver. DAGR will provide the Marine MAGTF with a Precise Positioning Service (PPS) and Selective Availability Anti-jam/Anti-spoofing Secure Mode (SAASM) capable handheld GPS receiver. DAGR is a dual frequency, twelve parallel channel receiver incorporating advanced receiver technology and advanced security devices developed jointly by industry and the NAVSTAR GPS Joint Program Office. Funds Distributed Operations The funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.

Command and Control On-the-move Network, Digital Over-the-horizon Relay (CONDOR) - will procure CONDOR Gateway (GW) "basic" equipment suites. This equipment suite will enable and provide on-the-move (OTM), over-the-horizon (OTH) connectivity among Tactical Data Radio networks (such as EPLRS networks). A CONDOR "basic" equipment suite consists primarily of a Saterlite Communication (SATCOM) modem, a mobile SATCOM antenna, a router, LAN encryption equipment, and a shock-mounted transit case. No vehicles are being procured. The CONDOR Ground Weapon (GW) equipment suite will be installed on existing vehicles.

GPS Navistar, - Global Positioning System is world-wide, space based, passive radio navigation system.

OS-302 - Satellite Communications On-The-Move Antenna System

MBMMR - The AN/PRC-117F Multi-band, Multi-mission Man-pack Radio covers the entire 30 to 512 MHz frequency range while offering embedded COMSEC, SATCOM, and ECCM capabilities. The AN/PRC-117F provides secure interoperability with SINCGARS and a host of other tactical radios. The AN/PRC-117F can be configured for Man-pack, vehicular and base station applications suitable for operation in a multimode service environment. Single radio that replaces three existing radios (PRC-113, PSc-5, and PRC-119).



Date:



0206313M


February 2007

TEAMS - The Tactical Elevated Antenna Mast System (TEAMS) is an antenna mast system that will support various line of sight antenna systems and will be transported on any AN/MRC-142A or the M-1123 HMMWV. TEAMS will support at least three UHF directional and omni-directional antennas. TEAMS replaces the SMAK antenna and increases the transmission range and utility of the MRC-142 system. This range increase directly supports ongoing operations and enhances the USMC’s distributed operations capability.

MRC-148 - ( HF Vehicle, Radio Set Vehicular, Control Group ) The RADIO SET provides half duplex High Frequency (HF) and Very High Frequency (VHF) tactical radio communications. It provides voice or data (using a Modem) through Single Sideband modulation selectable for either Upper Side Band (USB) or Lower Side Band (LSB). The AN/PRC-150 is capable of Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) compatible with MILSTD 188-141A ALE for frequency analysis. The HFMR’s 20 watt power output is provided by either battery or external electrical power. Transmission security is provided either through the KY-99 or its embedded TYPE 1 encryption. (Entry Device Program)Scheduled replacement of all current HF radios to include MRC-138s/PRC-104s. The MRC-148 is the new nomenclature for HF Vehicle (Radio Set Vehicular).

IISR - The Integrated Intra Squad Radio (IISR) supports the joint functional area Command and Control (C2). The current procurement is interim and is procured to meet Urgent Requirements. The IISR is a small, lightweight, hand held tactical radio that facilitates communications between fire team leaders and their squad leader. The IISR is also being fielded with an improved Quiet-Pro headset which not only increases the hearing range for the Marine but also uses the latest digital active noise reduction technology to act as an adaptive hearing protector.

HFMR - (HF Transit Case, HF Manpack TRC-209 AN/PRC-150 ) The HFMR AN/PRC-150 will be employed similarly to the legacy AN/PRC-104 HF Manpack Radio. This radio is the principle manpack system for reconnaissance and tactical air request information. It is interoperable with the AN/PRC-104, AN/MRC-138, and Army/Navy HF ALE. Continues the replacement of PRC-104 and other HF man-packed radios.

PRC-148 - THHR The AN/PRC-148 is a military-ready system capable of providing Marine Corps units with a standardized and maintainable hand held radio to support the communications requirements of small units (platoon, squad and team). The AN/PRC-148 operates (AM & FM) in the 30-512 MHz frequency spectrum, it contains embedded Type I communications security.



Date:



0206313M


February 2007

VRC-111- AN/VRC-111 is a dual transceiver capable communication system (SINCGARS capable) that can be populated with up to two AN/PRC-148 Multiband Inter/Intra Team Radios (MBITRs), two MBITR Vehicle Adapters, and a SINCGARS interface tray. It provides 20-W RF output from 30 to 512 MHz. The system supports basic SINCGARS functionality in vehicles equipped with two 30 to 88 MHz antennas and has a unique capability for a rapid cable-free radio dismount at the push of a button. It enables extended range for SINCGARS communications, additional capability for tactical air-to-ground communications. The AN/VRC-111 system provides multi-band communications for connectivity and operations in urban environments and replaces VRC-88 and VRC-89 and is found in the following vehicles: M997, M1035, M1043, M1045 and M1123.

EPLRS - The AN/VSQ-2C(V)2 is a Data Net Radio that provides secure, jam-resistant radio frequency connectivity and positional location capabilities to the user. The main components of the Radio Set are a receiver-transmitter (RT) (RT-1720C(C)/G), an Enhanced Dual Power Adapter (EDPA), a User’s Readout (URO) device for entering and receiving messages, and the appropriate installation kit for the platform from which it is to be operated.This request is designed to refresh current equipment tactical Communications Modernization Requirements.

The E-LMR network will provide a single, integrated public safety LMR communications system for all public safety and base installation personnel. It will be a "turnkey" package of equipment and services to include the system design, the furnishing of equipment, complete systems integration, testing, and life cycle support. The system will be an APCO 25 compliant UHF LMR system with Over-the-Air-Rekeying (OTAR) capability and the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption algorithm.The E-LMR system is a digital trunked land mobile radio system to be fielded throughout the Marine Corps’ Bases, Posts, and Stations (BPS). Throughout the first responder community (e.g., fire, police, emergency medical services, etc...), it is recognized that effective emergency communications is a key element in reducing the loss of life in any crisis or incident. This system will allow a coordinated response between Marine Corps emergency services and other federal, state, and local agencies involved in public safety. Additionally, E-LMR will provide interoperability within and between the service components on a day-to-day basis. COOP/Regionalization Procurement of enterprise/regional IT platforms for facilitating alignment of USMC network/storage capabilities in support of the Continuity Of Operations (COOP), Disaster Recovery (DR), and operational support of the Regional Commanders.

Reason funds are required: The requirement exists for various radios to bridge the growing shortfall of aging tactical radio systems and the replacement JTRS. The Marine Corps Legacy systems are failing at an alarming rate due to the fact that they are reaching the end of their service life, and experiencing the demanding effects of support to the OIF operations. Funds are required to improve, upgrade, enhance, and minimize the effects of tactical radio obsolescence while maximizing interoperability for the Marine Corps.



Date:




Vehicle Mounted Radio System AN/VRC-103 A 4.6

Q

CONDOR A 1.3

Q

AN/PSCN-13A DAGR A 0.4

Q

Radio Set High Frequency Manpack AN/PRC-150A

3.4

Q

THHR PRC 148 A 1.6Q

EPLRS A 3.7

Q

HF Manpack Radios A 1.9

Q

HF Transit Cases A 3.2

Q

Entry Device, Program A 0.2

Q

Radio Set A 1.3Q

Radio Set, UHF A 0.3Q

Totals 21.9

February 2007



Date:




Radio Set, Vehicular A 3.3Q

Terminal Channel Single A 0.3Q

Control Group Radio A 0.5Q

OS-302 Antenna A 1.2

Q

GBS A 0.3

Q

AN/PRC 148 (Maritime) Multiband A 0.1

Q

AN/VRC -90A

0.2

Q

AN/VRC-92 A 0.6

Q

Antenna Group A 0.5

Q

Various Radios and Comm Equipment A 2.7

Q

Totals 9.7

February 2007




Cost Analysis



Enterprise Land Mobile Radio 152194 VAR VAR

COOP/Regionalization 6000 VAR VAR

MBMMRVHF Manpack (AN/PRC -117F) 5173 162 31932PRC-117 (GBAD SUPPORT) 7904 247 32000Program Support 16

IISR Integrated InterSquad Radios (IISR) 10560 4224 2500

Handheld Commercial GPS 31202 1932 16150

AN/PRC-148 AN/PRC-148 V1C (Maritime) 7283 984 7401

Amphib InstallsHF Radios 36000 24 1500000Installation and Support 3500

LMST TSC-93 Upgrade 4000 6 666667 Quad-Band, High Grain, Antenna 3300 4 825000 Program Support 553

TOTALActive 267685Reserves 267685


FY 09

February 2007

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08



Date:


WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and Location Contract Method

Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit Cost Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


MBMMRFY07 VHF Manpack (PRC-117F) HARRIS CORP ROCHESTER,NY FFP MCSC Jul-07 Oct-07 162 31932 YES N NA

IISR FY07 Integrated InterSquad Radios (IISR) Motorola, Columbia, MD FFP MCSC Jul-07 Oct-07 4224 2500 YES N NA

Handheld Commercial GPS ROCKWELL COLLINS,INC FFP SPACE & MISSILES SYS Jul-07 Oct-07 1932 16150 YES N NACEDAR RAPIDS, IA EL, SEGUNDO,CA

AN/PRC-148 AN/PRC-148 V1C (Maritime) THALES, CLARKSBURG, MD FFP MCSC Jul-07 Oct-07 984 7401 YES N NA

Amphib Installs (FY07 Supplemental) HF Radios HARRIS CORP, Rochester NY FFP MCSC Jun-07 Sep-07 24 1500000 NO N NA

LMST TSC-93 Upgrade HARRIS CORP, Rochester NY FFP CECOM, FT MONMONTH Jul-07 Feb-08 6 666667 YES N NA Quad-Band, High Grain, Antenna HARRIS CORP, Rochester NY FFP CECOM, FT MONMONTH Jul-07 Feb-08 4 825000 YES N NA


February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

VHF Manpack (AN/PRC-117F)Integrated InterSquad Radios (IISR)Handheld Commercial GPSAN/PRC 148 V1C (Maritime)Amphib InstallsLMST

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

VHF Manpack (AN/PRC-117F) FY07 MC 162 162 A 162Integrated InterSquad Radios (IISR) FY07 MC 4224 4224 A 4224Handheld Commercial GPS FY07 MC 1932 1932 A 1932AN/PRC 148 V1C (Maritime) FY07 MC 984 984 A 984Amphib Installs FY07 MC 24 24 A 2 22LMST TSC-93 Upgrade FY07 MC 6 6 A 6LMSTQuad-Band, High Grain, Antenna FY07 MC 4 4 A 4

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

VHF Manpack (AN/PRC-117F) FY07 MC 162 162 62 50 50

Integrated InterSquad Radios (IISR) FY07 MC 4224 4224 1500 1500 1224

Handheld Commercial GPS FY07 MC 1932 1932 500 500 500 432

AN/PRC 148 V1C (Maritime) FY07 MC 984 984 500 484

Amphib Installs FY07 MC 24 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2LMST TSC-93 Upgrade FY07 MC 6 6 6LMSTQuad-Band, High Grain, Antenna FY07 MC 4 4 4

9 3

9

HARRIS CORP, ROCHESTER,NY 50 100 200

REMARKS:


BALANCEITEM


500 1000

500 1000 9

E

3

11 E

3 12

BALANCE




12

Fiscal Year 07

ECON MAX

3

12 E

E

Weapon System

Date:February 2007

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

P-1 Item Nomenclature:

E


Reorder Mfg PLT

12


MOTOROLA, COLUMBIA MD

ALT Prior to Oct 1



3

MSR

E

8

9 12

3

ROCKWELL COLLINS INC., IA

THALES, CLARKSBURG MD

HARRIS CORP, ROCHESTER,NY

250

250

TBD

500 1500 3000

HARRIS CORP, ROCHESTER,NY TBD TBD TBD

TBD

9

TBD

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06


Date:



0206313M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communication Switching & Control Systems

February 2007


Tactical Data Network (TDN) is a system of data communications Gateways and Data Distribution Systems (DDSs). This network provides its subscribers with basic data transfer and switching services and access to strategic, supporting establishment, joint, and other service component tactical data networks. Requested funding will be used to procure an additional 9 DDSs in support of new unit operational requirements.

The Transition Switch Module (TSM) provides commercially available circuit switching and multiplexing technology to replace the aging TRI-TAC equipment necessary for telephone service in the deployed environment. It provides all of the services currently available in USMC switching equipment in a smaller, modular and lighter package. Requested funding will be utilized to procure TSM equipment in place of the multiplexer, communication patching panel, automatic telephone switchboard, telephone accessory maintenance kit, telephone sets, fiber optic converter sets, and the automatic telephone switching unit.



Date:



0206313M A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communication Switching & Control Systems

February 2007

Communications Security Cables (COMSEC) support Marine Corps COMSEC interface requirements in a timely and cost effective manner. A continuous requirement to provide the FMF with new ancillaries and cable interfaces for interconnection between COMSEC devices and MAGTF C4I systems, C4IIT Network Security Systems, C4IAD Air Defense systems, and other systems with interface requirements for stand-alone COMSEC devices during acquisition, implementation, fielding, and life cycle support. Requested funding will be utilized to procure Simple Key Loader (SKL), Secure Telephone Equipment (STE), and KIV-7M encryption devices in place of the Data Transfer Device, Electronic Transfer Device, Net Control Device, Wireline Adapter, ANDVT/MINTERM Terminal, Secure Digital Network Radio Interface, GP Telegraphy Encryption Equipment, Digital Terminal Voice Subscriber, Encryption-Decryption Equipment, and the Trunk Encryption Device.

FACSIMILE, DIGITAL, LTWT (Blackjack) is the FMF tactical facsimile used in support of MAGTF communications. Requested funding will be utilized to procure the Digital, Lightweight Facsimile.

MESSAGE SYSTEM, DIGITAL AN/PSC-2 (DACT) is a tactical input/output battlefield situational awareness system and communications terminal. It bridges the digital divide that enables combat operations using digital command and control. It injects blue PLI into the MAGTF commander’s Common Operational Picture (COP), thus greatly increasing tempo of battle, while greatly reducing the potential for fratricide. It is the foundation of the MAGTF's COP. Requested funding will be utilized to procure the DACT in place of the Digital Message System AN/PSC-2.

Reason funds are required: Funds are needed to fulfill equipment requirements resulting from the establishment of new operational units. Impact if funds are not provided: New operational units will not be equipped with necessary communications equipment.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronic Equipment (4)


ACCESSORY MAINTENANCE KIT, TELEPHONE A D 0.04

Q

MESSAGE SYSTEM, DIGITAL A D 1.53

Q

CONVERTER SET, FIBER OPTIC A D 0.12

Q

FACSIMILE, DIGITAL, LTWT A D 0.22

Q

MULTIPLEXER A D 0.06

Q

PANEL, PATCHING, COMMUNICATION A D 0.01

Q

SWITCHBOARD, TELEPHONE, AUTOMATIC A D 0.56

Q

SWITCHING UNIT, TELEPHONE, AUTOMATIC A D 0.19

Q

DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DDS) A D 2.97

TELEPHONE SET A D 0.15

Q

TRANSFER DEVICE, DATA (DTD) A D 0.67

Q

TRANSFER DEVICE, ELECTRONIC A D 0.12

Q

Totals 6.62

Communication Switching & Control Systems

February 2007



Date:




CONTROL DEVICE, NET A D 0.02

Q

ADAPTER, WIRELINE A D 0.01

Q

TERMINAL, ANDVT/MINTERM A D 0.27

Q

SECURE DIGITAL NET RADIO INTERFACE A D 0.03

Q

ENCRYPTION EQUIP, TELEGRAPHY, GP A D 0.06

Q

TERMINAL, VOICE SUBSCRIBER, DIGITAL A D 0.12

Q

ENCRYPTION-DECRYPTION EQUIPMENT A D 0.12

Q

ENCRYPTION DEVICE , TRUNK A D 0.03

Q

Totals 0.65

Communication Switching & Control Systems

February 2007



Date:



0206313M Marine Corps Communication Equipment

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 1.606 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.606

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 1.606 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.606

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 1.606 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.606

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications and Electronic Equipment 4635 - COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 17.063 53.580 1.606 72.249

DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM/CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY WORKSTATIONS ( DMS CAW): Upgraded Certificate Authority Workstations (CAW) and hardware interface boards will be procured which provide FORTEZZA certificate management required to support encryption and decryption of Defense Message System (DMS) organizational messages. The new CAWs will support the bases, MEFs, schoolhouse, and remote re-key of FORTEZZA cards.



Date:




DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM / CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY WORKSTATIONS A D 1.606

Q

Totals 1.606

4635 - COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT

February 2007



Date:



0206313M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 56.8

Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions) FY2007 Baseline FY2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 23.953 35.279 56.800 115.672 The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) Support Equipment will provide a complete and coordinated modernization effort for the equipment of the Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS) to support its employment in future battlefield environments. CAC2S will eliminate the current dissimilar aviation command and control systems and will add capability for aviation combat direction and air defense functions. CAC2S will be comprised of standardized tactical facilities, hardware and software and will significantly reduce the physical size and logistical footprint of existing MACCS equipment suites.

Reason funds are needed: To restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Without this type of equipment, the deployed Marines currently in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) are more likely to be wounded or killed by friendly fire, especially when conducting Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT), and this proposed supplemental funding is the only source of funds that is available to satisfy this contingency requirement.



Exhibit P-5, Appropriation/ Budget Activity/Serial No: 4/Communications & Elec Equip P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: Weapon System Type: Date:

Cost Analysis


$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $CAC2S (LRIP Systems) 23124 12 1927000CAC2S (GETT for EDM & LRIP systems) 5940 VAR VARCAC2S (GFE Long Lead) 5600 VAR VARCAC2S (VRC-103 Radios for EDM) 3680 VAR VARCAC2S (Additional CFE Long Lead for LRIP) 4756 VAR VARCAC2S (Obsolescence TI) 3680 VAR VARCAC2S (MCTSSA NDF) 10020 VAR VAR


Note*: To procure JSS remaining requirement

FY 09

February 2007




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


CAC2S (LRIP Systems) Raytheon IDS San Diego FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Aug-07 Aug-08 12 1,927,000 N N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications & Elec Equip AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

CAC2S

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 12 12 A 12

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 12 12

2210 12TBDRaytheon Systems, San Diego, CA

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEMCAC2S

Calendar Year 06


Manufacturer's NAME / LOCATION Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

MSR

TBD Each

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAXECON

TBD

Weapon System

Date:February 2007

P-1 Item Nomenclature:AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Communications & Electronics Equipment (4)a

CAC2S (LRIP)


Fiscal Year 09

Fiscal Year 07

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

BALANCE

Calendar Year 07


Production Schedule

Date:



0206118M Tactical Air Control Systems (Marine Corps) A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) RADAR SYSTEMS

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total14.732 21.093 20.900 56.725

AN/TPS-59 LONG RANGE RADAR CONTROL SHELTER: The AN/TPS-59 radar system was fielded in 1984 and upgraded to (V)3 in 1998. Significant DMS and obsolescence issues now plague the system. This effort will upgrade the electronics on both the antenna pedestal and within the control shelter. These modifications will be fielded on all 11 radar systems. This refresh will move functions from analog to digital, from hardware to software and will maximize the use of COTS equipment. the TPS-59 - Radar Analysis Support System Real Time System (RASS-R) is a collection of tools for real time recording, monitoring, and analyzing to aid in radar calibration.

AN/TPS-63 Medium Range Radars: This is the estimated cost of procurement for two Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) actions and rebuild of two shelters. There are currently five ECP’s on contract, with completion planned over the next two fiscal years. Twelve copies of each ECP item will be procured to meet the AAO. The rebuild of two radar shelters will provide the fleet with a full Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO) of radars that have been rebuilt within the last 4 years. The need is for continued operations of this radar until G/ATOR is fielded under technology refresh and continued sustainment actions.

Funds replace in-theater equipment that has exceeded service life and restore Marine Corps capability to pre-war levels. The funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.

Reason funds are required: The funds for the AN/TPS-63 Small Medium Range Radar provide for the procurement of two Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) actions. There are currently five ECP’s on contract, with completion planned over the next two fiscal years. The need is for continued operations of this radar until G/ATOR is fielded under technology refresh and continued sustainment actions.

Impact if funds are not provided: If the AN/TPS-63 effort is not funded, the operational impact on the radar would be extended downtime and loss of medium range air surveillance capability for the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF).These funds will allow the accelerated development of Increment II, which is the replacement for the AN/TPQ-46A – currently deployed to OIF. These funds will also allow the program to continue to pursue an accelerated MS B for Increment II and use the FY06 Congressional plus Up to its full advantage.Current radar performance does not meet operational forces requirements for the MAGTF. Failure to support this initiative delays seizing the moment in taking advantage of technological breakthroughs. The lapse jeopardizes operational forces from having the technological advantage in detecting, identifying, and classifying threats on the battlefield. These funds will allow the accelerated development of Increment II, which is the replacement for the AN/TPQ-46A – currently deployed to OIF.



Date:




Small/Medium Range Radars A D 1.4Q

Totals 1.4

RADAR SYSTEMS

February 2007



Exhibit P-5, Appropriation/ Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: Weapon System Type: Date:Cost Analysis

ID PRIOR YRSCD TotalCostTotalCost Qty UnitCos TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost


AN/TPS-59 Control Shelter Refresh 19500 VAR VAR


FY 09

February 2007RADAR SYSTEMSProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4)




Date:





Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc Qty Gross Cost 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Comminications and Electronics Equipment (4) MOD KITS

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total17.381 43.185 16.571 77.137

Intelligence Analysis System (IAS) Family of Systems (FoS) is the all source fusion hub for all Marine Corps intelligence data. Information and intelligence passes through the IAS FoS from Joint, Combined, theater and national systems and is processed into the useable intelligence made available to all levels of command. The IAS FoS is a three tiered family of systems providing support from the MEF down to the Battalion / Squadron level. Tier one is comprised of two vehicle mounted systems and the associated shelters and supports the MEF and Intelligence Battalions. Tier two consists of a two server suite supporting the Division, Wing, MLG, and a single server supporting the Regt, MAG, and MEU. Tier three consists of laptop workstations provided to all units from the MEF down to the Battalion / Squadron.



Date:


q

#N/A MOD KITS

February 2007

Various Modification Kits - provides a responsive capability to alleviate Marine Corps intelligence systems shortfalls created by the evolving missions, threats and command relationships associated with the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and 21st century expeditionary military operations. ISR provides for rapid technology insertion, as well as quick reaction training and logistics, to meet the time sensitive intelligence infrastructure requirements of Marine Corps Operating Forces and the theater and service intelligence organizations supporting those forces.

Technical Control and Analysis Center (TCAC) provides analysis of Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) data, steerage and management of collection assets, production of SIGINT products, and maintains data and voice communications connectivity to various assets at varying levels (including national, higher, adjacent, and intra-Radio Battalions) within the intelligence community. TCAC performs state of the art collection management, processing, analysis, and dissemination of tactical SIGINT information collected by the Radio Battalions (RadBn) organic to the Marine Air Ground Task Force. Additionally, support the increase in TCAC RAWS and Transportable Workstation AAOs, the purchase of additional Tactical OneRoofs, the Tactical OneRoof upgrade equipment, Multi-level security components, and software licenses. Funds support combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items, it is an urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment, and Distributed Operations. The funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.

Communication Emitter Sensing and Attacking System (CESAS) is a system of COTS/GOTS designed to support the MAGTF Commander in conducting operations. It provides the capability to effectively sense/detect and attack, through the use of electromagnetic energy, the enemy's communication systems in support of the Commander's Command and Control Warfare plan. The system will replace for the existing AN/ULQ-19 and will assume the mission of sensing and denying the enemy the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, thereby disrupting his command and control system. Though primarily HMMWV-mounted, CESAS will also be capable of both seaborne and airborne deployment and employment, enhancing the Radio Battalion's ability to support Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare. The CESAS operate within the bandwidth of 20 to 1500 MHz (Threshold) 2MHz to 2500 MHz (Objective) against enemy emitters that use modern modulation schemes.

Reason funds are required: The TCAC funds are requested to replace the gear that has been in country for over three years. One of the RadBn complete supplies of TCAC equipment has been in country since the first deployment. Additionally, the demand for TCAC equipment is increasing based on the on-going operational demands of OIF.MEWSS systems have been deployed to Iraq since the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom. They have provided the only SIGINT/EW platform that is allowed to go to forward areas and operate in an effective manner. Consequently they have received heavy, continuous usage, and they need immediate upgrades and refurbishment.BATS funds are urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment in handling detainees in support of OIF.Funds support distributed combat operations and force protection camera equipment. This capability ensures the MAGTF's ability to capture actionable intelligence from patrols, convoys, etc. Additional funds are required for JSTARS because of the added roles and responsibilities this platform is performing in support of OIF. These funds will facilitate technology refreshes to keep the Marine Corps JSTARS CGSs and JSWSs in theater operational.

Impact if funds are not provided: If this initiative is not funded, there will continue to be a shortage of equipment. The operational commanders in OIF will be limited in their ability to leverage national level SIGINT support assets critical for mission accomplishment.

Bli No. 465200 Item No. 30 Page 2 of 6Exhibit P-40,


Date:




VARIOUS MODIFICATION KITS A D 2.8

SUITE, ANALYSIS SYSTEM, INTEL A D 4.6

Q

COMMUNICATION EMITTER SENSING AND ATTACKING SYSTEM (CESAS) A D 4.0

Q

Totals 11.426

MOD KITS

February 2007




Cost Analysis February 2007

Weapon System ID PYs FY 06 FY07 FY08 FY 09Cost Elements CD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost

$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $TCACAN/UYQ-83B (TCAC RAWS) 150 1 150000

AN/MYQ-9B (Transportable Workstation) 15 1 15000

Tactical OneRoof 300 SW Support 2780 VAR VAR MLS Support 1900

TOTAL 5145



MOD KIT

BLI No. 465200Item No. 30 Page 4 of 6

Exhibit P-5, Weapon System Cost Analysis

Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07 SUPPLEMENT TCACAN/UYQ-83B (TCAC RAWS) VARIOUS FFP NAWCWD PT Mugu, Ca Jun-07 Sep-07 1 150000 Yes N/A N/AAN/MYQ-9B (Transportable Workstation) Hewlett Packard FFP MCSC Quantico, Virginia Jun-07 Sep-07 1 15000 Yes N/A N/A


February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

TCAC AN/MYQ-9B

TCAC AN/UYQ-83B

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 1 1 A 107 MC 1 1 A 1

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM

HEWLETT PACKARD


1

3

BALANCE



1 1 1 8

Each


11

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Weapon System

VARIOUS


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

3

Date:February 2007

TCAC AN/MYQ-9BTCAC AN/UYQ-83B

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

Each

8 11


Fiscal Year 09

1 1

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM


Date:



0206211M Divisions (Marine) B

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 21.3 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Elec Equip (4) FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEMS

February 2007

Lightweight Handheld Mortar Ballistic Computer (LHMBC): LHMBC will automate the computation of firing solutions and provide the Mortar Fire Direction Center with a capability to compensate for meteorological conditions and propellant temperature, thereby increasing the responsiveness and accuracy of mortar fires. It will provide the primary means by which mortar fire direction centers at the section and platoon levels convert requests for fire into appropriate firing data and fire commands. The LHMBC will replace the M16 and M19 plotting boards, and mortar and tabular firing tables. Laser Target Designator (LTD): Formerly known as GLTD II, this line includes the Portable Lightweight Designator Rangefinder, Universal Modular Laser Equipment (MULE), Range Finder laser designator LTWT (LLDR), and the North Finding Module, components that have been replaced by the LTD. The MULE is the current designator of record for the USMC. The LTD is the replacement system and is a lightweight, man-portable laser designator and rangefinder which can be mounted on a tripod or any stable surface in an upright position. A typical system consists of: designator, batteries, remote fire cable, power cable, training filters, tripod, shipping/storage case, and operator manuals. Ground Counter Fire System (GCFS): The GCFS is a Commercial Off-the-Shelf/Non-Developmental Item (COTS/NDI) that is being fielded as a response to an Urgent Universal Needs Statement (UNS) by the operating forces. The GCFS is a passive, autonomous system that will provide accurate location of indirect fire systems, explosive detonations, and heavy direct fire weapons. GCFS is a material solution augmenting currently fielded sensor systems. GCFS provides 360-degree coverage and can identify a 155mm howitzer to a minimum of 20km. It operates 24 hours/day, utilizes waveform communications from sensor post to command post and utilizes WGS84 datum and ellipsoid map references. Common Laser Range Finder (CLRF): This line includes the Infrared Laser Observation Set and the Eyesafe Binocular Laser Range Finder, both part of the legacy system for CLRF. Azimuth and Eye-safe Range finding Observation Set (AEROS) will provide the primary means for front line Marine forces at the platoon, company and battalion level to obtain accurate target location. It is a small, lightweight, highly portable, night observation capable, optical system containing an integral eye-safe laser rangefinder and azimuth and inclination sensors. AEROS will be capable of interfacing with the Precision-Lightweight Global Positioning Receiver (PLGR) and capable of exporting targeting data to the Target Location, Designation, and Hands-off System (TLDHS) Target Hand-Off System (THS).



Date:



0206211M Divisions (Marine) B

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Elec Equip (4) FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEMS

February 2007

Enhanced Portable Inductive Artillery Fuze Setter (EPIAFS): The Enhanced portable Inductive Artillery Fuze Setter (EPIAFS) is for setting the Excalibur and inductive fuses with GPS. It is used on munitions in field artillery designed to increase efficiency of service and decrease crew error.VECTOR 21 B: The VECTOR 21B provides accurate target location and recognition in clear and obscured visual conditions using an internal eye-safe laser rangefinder, digital compass, and vertical angle sensor. It is battery powered, compact, and may be hand held or tripod-mounted. Artillery Shelter: The Shop Set Equipment Artillery shelter is a transportable facility designed to provide Intermediate Maintenance Activity (IMA) maintenance capability for maintaining/repair of artillery equipment. It provides a working and storage space and the basic tools and equipment used to maintain/repair artillery equipment.Aiming Circle: The M2A2 Aiming Circle w/accessory equipment is used for precise measurement of azimuth and elevation angles of a ground or aerial target. The primary means of orienting the cannon battery or laying weapons on the azimuth of fire.

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total Fire Support Systems 31.671 43.265 21.282 96.218

Reason funds are required: Operation Iraqi Freedom

Impact if funds are not provided: • If EPIAFS is not funded, we will not be able to shoot Excalibur. • If GCFS is not funded, we will have no batteries or spares to support the system in 2008. The GCFS system has proved to be extremely effective in counter battery and intelligence finding Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Its continued support is extremely important. • If the Artillery Shelters are not funded, no transportable facilities will be available to provide an IMA capability for deployed units.• If the various Fire Support Systems are not funded, we will not be able to provide systems to train with in preparation for deployment to Iraq. Additionally, units will be unable to compensate for varying meteorological conditions, obtain accurate target locations, and orient the weapons on the azimuth of fire. • If Vector-21B is not funded, artillery units will be unable to provide accurate target location coordinates for the direction of artillery rounds.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Elec Equip (4)


Lightweight Handheld Mortar Balistic Computer A D 0.153Q 39

Laser Target Designator A D 4.178

Q VAR

Ground Counter Fire System Battery A D 4.000

Q VAR

Common Laser Range Finder A D 3.101

Q VAR

Enhanced Portable Inductive Artillery Fuze Setter A D 3.600

Q 120

Vector 21-B A D 2.957

Q 126

Artillery Shelter A D 3.250

Q 13

Aiming Circle A D 0.043

Q 12

Totals 21.282

FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEMS

February 2007



Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Comminications and Electronics Equipment (4) INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 27.482 81.720 32.073 141.275 Team Portable Collection System (TPCS-MPC) has not been fielded as originally scheduled. Consequently, the operating forces are hampered with continued use of a non-supported, unsustainable, out-dated SIGINT system that is no longer capable of targeting modern communication signals being deployed by enemy forces in OIF. Funding procures TPCS-MPC Blk 0 SIGINT suites and ground Platform Integration Kits which are urgently needed to restore planned AAO production quantities that are necessary to address the SIGINT deficiencies of the operating forces.

Topographic Production Capability (TPC) supports enhanced geospatial information (GI) and geographic intelligence (GINT) to the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF). GI and GINT support decision making by maintaining current geographic and terrain factors in universally accessible databases allowing expeditionary forces to access, manipulate, and use information in near real time, developing the foundation for the common tactical picture (CTP), fully integrated with the theater COP that allows tailorable mapping visualization. The TPC provides critical, timely, and accurate digital and hardcopy geospatial information (GI) and geographic intelligence (GINT) to support mission planning and execution. All levels of the FoS support the global war on terrorism (GWOT), anti-terrorism force protection (AT/FP), homeland defense / humanitarian relief (HD/HR), as well as force projection and tactical and operational intelligence operations. The TPC provides a flexible and extensible data management framework (system construct) in order to support the capturing of unstructured and structured GI and geospatial intelligence (GEOINT) data that will allow information to be organized and "tagged" for later use in data interoperability, data discovery and data fusion.

Reason funds are required: Equipment is required to support on-going combat operations in support of OIF. Plus, it restores Marine Corps unit capability to pre-OIF level.Impact if funds are not provided: If this initiative is not funded, the Marine Corps will continue to lack an organic WFVPS capability to support MAGTF Persistent ISR/IED Mitigation in the GWOT, and deployed forces will continue to rely upon support from theater controlled high demand/low density assets. This does not meet the MAGTF’s operational Persistent ISR/IED Mitigation support requirements against an increasingly adaptive and dangerous enemy. The Angel Fire WFVPS capability also represents a core component of the emerging, adaptive Persistent ISR architecture that will enable future operating concepts such as shifting to Irregular Warfare and Distributed Operations (DO).



Date:




Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Comminications and Electronics Equipment (4) INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

February 2007

Tactical Exploitation Group (TEG) funding purchases the hardware and software for 27 TEG Exploitation Workstations (EWS). These workstations will be Window’s-based and will leverage off the TEG Remote Workstation hardware. The workstations will be integrated as part of the TEG-Main which will provide a new software/hardware baseline and an upgrade of the TEG-EWS from UNIX to Windows. Ultimately iI will provide each Intelligence Battalion with a more modular Imagery Intelligence (IMINT) capability and increased deployment options.

MAGTF Secondary Imagery Dissemination System (MSIDS): MSIDS is the only FoS that provides organic tactical digital imagery collection, transmission and receiving capability to the MAGTF Commander. MSIDS is comprised of components necessary to enable Marines to capture, manipulate, annotate, transmit or receive images in Near Real Time (NRT), internally with subordinate commands that are widely separated throughout the area of operations and externally with high adjacent commands in NRT. Other MAGTF near-real-time imaging systems, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and F/A-18 Advanced Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance System (ATARS), only provide overhead imagery and cannot capture the detail and ground perspectives available with MSIDS. In asymmetric threat environments—where targets of interest are often small, highly mobile units, such as terrorists or guerilla groups—it is imperative that the MAGTF be able to identify individuals and structures from the ground level. The required detail is not available from overhead sources.

Counterintelligence (CI) and Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Equipment Program (CIHEP) suite of equipment provides technical collections, analysis and reporting equipment to support CI and HUMINT operations. CIHEP is comprised of modular groupings of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) government off-the-shelf (GOTS) and non-developmental item (NDI) components that enhance the Operating Force CI/HUMINT collection capabilities and improve interoperability within the Joint CI/HUMINT communities. This modularity allows Marines to perform a myriad of missions to support Commanders while only carrying the items needed to accomplish the specific task. The CIHEP Suite is composed of ten component modules: CIHEP DPM, CIHEP Advanced Imagery Module (AIM), CIHEP Tactical Satellite Communications (SATCOM) Set, CIHEP Tactical Handheld Communications Set, CIHEP Commercial SATCOM Set, CIHEP Commercial Handheld SATCOM Set, CIHEP Surveillance Communications Set, CIHEP Technical Surveillance Module, CIHEP Technical Support Set and CIHEP Accessory Module. CI/HUMINT Marines integrate information collected from these modules with information obtained from HUMINT sources. Funding will procure various number of CI/HUMIT components to construct modules and sets as necessary to fulfill current Fleet Marine Force shorfalls.

Various Intelligence Support Equipment - Funds provide tactical digital imagery collection, transmission and receiving capability to the Infatry Battalions. This equipment is necessary to enable Marines to capture, manipulate, annotate, transmit or receive images in Near Real time (NRT). These funds will also provide critical, timely and accurate digital and hardcopy geospatial information (GI) and geographic intelligence (GINT) to support mission planning and execution. This includes MAGTF Secondary Imagery Dissemination System (MSIDS): MSIDS is the only FoS that provides organic tactical digital imagery collection, transmission and receiving capability to the MAGTF Commander. MSIDS is comprised of components necessary to enable Marines to capture, manipulate, annotate, transmit or receive images in Near Real Time (NRT), internally with subordinate commands that are widely separated throughout the area of operations and externally with high adjacent commands in NRT. Other MAGTF near-real-time imaging systems, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and F/A-18 Advanced Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance System (ATARS), only provide overhead imagery and cannot capture the detail and ground perspectives available with MSIDS. In asymmetric threat environments—where targets of interest are often small, highly mobile units, such as terrorists or guerilla groups—it is imperative that the MAGTF be able to identify individuals and structures from the ground level. The required detail is not available from overhead sources.

Dragon Eye is a five-pound, back-packable, modular unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to provide the Marine small unit commander with a reconnaissance and surveillance capability to see over the next hill or building.



Date:




VARIOUS INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT A D 5.4

Q

TEAM PORTABLE COMMINT SYSTEM MPC A D 3.2

Q

UAV SYSTEM, DRAGON EYE A D 1.7

Q

Totals 10.3

Intelligence Support Equipment

February 2007




Cost Analysis February 2007

Weapon System ID PYs FY 06 FY07 FY08 FY 09Cost Elements CD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost

$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $TPCTactical Geospatial Info Library (TGIL) 360 3 120000Deployable Geospatial Info Library Server (DGIL-S) 900 3 300000

Deployable Geospatial Info Library Workstation (DGIL-W) 900 3 300000

Digital Terrain Analysis Mapping System (DTAMS) - Mass Storage Upgrade 2515 VAR VAR - Hardware/Software Upgrade 2172 VAR VARSurvey Set, Geodetic 2000Program Support 429

Total 9276

CI AND HUMINT EQUIP (CIHEP) SUPP - Data Processing Module 1000 VAR VAR - Tactical SATCOM Set 1000 VAR VAR - Commerical Handheld SATCOM SET 815 VAR VAR - Surveillance Comm Set 1130 VAR VAR - Program Support 55

TOTAL 4000

TACTICAL EXPLOITATION GROUP CDL REFRESH 3000 3 1000000 TEG-M 4432 1 4432000 TEG EWS 1082 VAR VARTOTAL 8514



Intelligence Support Equipment

BLI No. 474700Item No. 43 Page 4 of 6

Exhibit P-5,Weapon System Cost Analysis

Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07 SUPPLEMENTAL TPC

Tactical Geospatial Info Library (TGIL)Northrop Grumman, TASC Chantilly, VA FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jul-07 Sep-07 3 120000 Yes N/A N/A

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Server( DGIL-S)Northrop Grumman, TASC Chantilly, VA FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jul-07 Sep-07 3 300000 Yes N/A N/A

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Workstation (DGIL-W)Northrop Grumman, TASC Chantilly, VA FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jul-07 Sep-07 3 300000 Yes N/A N/A

TEGCDL REFRESH SPAWAR, CHARLESTON, NC FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jan-07 Jul-07 3 1000000 Yes N/A N/A

TEG-M NORthrop Grumman, LINTICUM, MD FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jan-07 Jul-07 1 4432000 Yes N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Intelligence Support Equipment

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

TACTICAL GEOSPATIAL INFO LIBRARY

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Server(DGIL-S)Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Workstation (DGIL-W)

TEG CDL REFRESH

TEG-M

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 3 3 A 1 2

073 3 A 1

2

073 3 A 1

2

07 3 3 A 1 1 1

07 1 1 A 1

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 3 2 1 1

073 2 1 1

073 2 1 1Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Workstation

(DGIL-W)

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Server (DGIL-S)

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1 11



1 1 2 1



2

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Intelligence Support Equipment


ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

Weapon System

NORTHROP GRUMMAN TASC CHANTILLY VA

PROCUREMENT LEADTIMESPRODUCTION RATEReorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

MAX

Date:February 2007

Tactical Geospatial Info Library (TGIL)

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

EACH

1

Calendar Year 07

Fiscal Year 09

2 3

1 1

BALANCE

Fiscal Year 08

Calendar Year 06

TEG CDL REFRESH

TEG-M

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEMTactical Geospatial Info Library (TGIL)

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Server (DGIL-S)

EACH

EACH

1

1

2

2

2 EACH

EACH

Deployable Geospatial Info Library-Workstation (DGIL-W)

ITEM

1



SPAWAR, CHARLESTON, NC

NORTHROP GRUMMAN, LINTICUM, MD

Fiscal Year 06

1 2

12


Date:



0206313M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT (493000)

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)

FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $7.791 $210.501 $73.431 $291.723



Date:



0206313M A


February 2007

Sight, Weapon, Thermal. - A lightweight, low power, high performance, forward looking infrared (FLIR) device. TWS will augment existing crew-served night vision sights. TWS operates by discerning the temperature variation between targets and their background. The TWS is completely passive and although designed for target detection and engagement with Marine Corps crew-served weapons, it can be used for all weather surveillance. The Marine Corps is procuring the Medium Thermal Weapon Sight (MTWS) and the Heavy Thermal Weapon Sight (HTWS). Both sights have the same design but the difference lies in the telescope and the software. The Thermal Imager, Long Range is a stand-alone, portable binocular, hand-held, battery-operated style instrument used to observe/orient, detect and identify targets, conduct surveillance and assist in engaging targets during all lighting conditions. The Tactical Range Thermal Imager is a stand-alone, portable binocular, hand-held, battery-operated style instrument used to observe/orient, detect and identify targets, conduct surveillance and assist in engaging targets during all lighting conditions.

Grenade Launcher Day Night Sight Mount AN/PSQ 18 - An enhanced aiming device designed to enable the Marine to rapidly and precisely fire the M203 in daylight, low-light, and night conditions.

Intensifier, Image, Night Vision - Also known as the AN/PVS 14, is a hand-held pocket scope, mounted to a head or helmet or mounted to a weapon. 1st Marine Division requested systems to prepare for Operation IRAQI Freedom. This item continues to provide a critical capability and is planned to remain in the inventory through the year 2013.

Sight, Night Vision, Mini 4.5X and 2.25X - A lightweight compact high performance device that will use the OMNI IV MX 10160 image intersifier tube. The system weighsless than two pounds, comes with a MIL-STD-1913 rail grabber interface, and is immersible to 66 feet. The AN/PVS-17 consists of two configurations, the AN/PVS-17B and AN/PVS-17C. The 17B incorporates a 2.25x magnification and the 17C incorporates a 4.5x magnification.

Individual Weapon Night Sight - An individual imaging device capable of acquiring targets at night with increased recognition certainty when used in conjunction with theRifle Combat Optic variants. Sight, Night Vision, Weapon, Indiv - A portable, battery-operated, second generation image intensification device used for observation and aimed fire of weapons at night.

Sight, Bore, Optical - The LBS is used to boresight (align) the Thermal Weapon Sight, the Medium Power Laser Illuminator and other Night Vision devices to the various weapons systems to which they are attached. The Boresight System, Laser is a Class 2 laser device that emits a highly collimated beam of visible light for precise zeroing. Argon Reservoir Assembly - The Argon Reservoir Assembly (E0030) super cools the spectral discrimination of the seeker detector material in the seeker unit enabling the Stinger Missile Systems to acquire, track, and engage targets.



Date:



0206313M A


February 2007

Visible Light Illuminator - A compact, lightweight, combat flashlight that projects a wide-angle beam with a concentrated central beam of white light for searching, acquisition, identification, and momentary dazzling of targets in any low-light environment.Telescope, Scout Sniper Observation - A lightweight, variable power, tripod mounted telescope used for detecting, recognizing, observing, identifying, and ranging targets during daylight with increased identification certainty. Also identified as Observation Telescope and Telescope, Observation with Equipment.Scout Sniper Mid-Range Night Sight - A lightweight, weapon-mounted, battery operated, imaging device for engagement of targets at night and low light conditions. Sniper Day Scope - A variable power scope that provides the scout sniper with the capability to clearly, easily, and quickly, acquire and engage targets out to the maximum effective range of the host weapon. Night Sight, Sniper - Also known as the AN/PVS 10, it is an integrated day/night sniper rifle sight. It eliminates the needfor separate optical sighting systems for day and night operation. RCO TA-31B - The rifle combat optic is an optical scope of fixed power designed to enable the Marine to identify and engage personnel at the maximum effective range of the M16A4 service rifle during varying light conditions. The RCO will be a compact, rugged and capable aiming device. Sight, Night Vision Sight, Weapon, Crew Served (AN/TVS-5) - A portable, battery-operated; GEN III I2 device used for observation and aimed fire of weapons at night. Infrared Illuminator/ATPIAL - Also known as the AN/PEQ-2A, is a lightweight, self-contained, battery-powerd infrared aiming light/illuminator to be used with the newer night vision devices such as PVS-14's and PVS-7's. The Illuminator Laser, Medium Power (AN/PEQ-4), is a Class 4 laser pointing and illuminating system capable of providing illumination and point capabilities for close air support. The Light, Aiming, Infrared, also known as the PEQ 6A, provides the user with either visible or infrared illumination of the target for target acquisition, and either visible or infrared target aiming point for fire control.Kit, Purging - The E12552E Purge Kit, Fire Control is required to support the purging and charging (with compressed Nitrogen) of the various electro-optical systems and devices incorporated into current and emerging Marine Corps Weapons Systems. The Electro-Optical systems and devices include but are not limited to: Laser Range Finders and Designators, Passive Night Vision Sights (Night Vision Goggles; I2 Devices), Infrared Sighting Systems, Small Guided Missiles, Optical Sighting, Tracking, and Observation Systems Goggles, Night Vision, Indiv - Also known as the AN/PVS 7, is a lightweight monocular night vision goggle that uses prisms to give Marines binocular vision at night.Test Set, Electronic Systems - A lightweight, battery, operated hand-held device used by designated maintenance personnel (MOS 2111 or 2171) to assess the operational performance of night vision devices at the Operator/Crew and Field levels.

Reason funds are required: Funds are required to restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level, fund equipment for pre-deployment training, fund distributed operations, fund training, equipment and housing for FSRG units and capabilities and fund equipment necessary to outfit and stand-up MarSoc units.Impact if funds are not provided: If not funded Marines deployed in support of OIF will lack a proven night vision, aiming for the M203, flexible scoping, maintenance, night vision, sighting, sniper, and proven low light illumination capability for current operations in OIF.



Date:




Kit, Purging A D 0.075

Q

Thermal Imager, Long Range A D 2.304

Q

Individual Weapon Sight/Sight Night Vision, Weapon, Indiv A D 3.834

Q

Telescope, Scout-Sniper Observation A D 0.414

Q

Observation Telescope A D 0.030

Q

Telescope, Observation w/ Equipment A D 0.092

Q

Night Sight, Sniper A D 0.069

Q

Scout Sniper Mid-Range Sight A D 0.138

Q

Sniper Day Scope A D 0.015

Q

Visible Light Illuminator A D 1.512

Q

Sight, Night Vision, Weapon, Crew Served A D 2.904

Q

Subtotal 11.387

NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT (493000)

February 2007



Date:




Sight, Bore, Optical A D 0.362

Q

Boresight System, Laser A D 0.110

Q

Grenade Launcher Day Night Sight Mount AN/PSQ-18A A D 2.106

Q

RCO TA-31B A D 1.376

Q

Illuminator Infrared A D 1.227

Q

Illuminator, Laser, Medium Power A D 1.007

Q

Light, Aiming, Infrared A D 0.238

Q

Argon Resevoir Assem A D 0.929

Q

Test Set, Electronic Systems A D 0.006

Q

A D

Q

A D

Q

Subtotal 7.361

NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT (493000)

February 2007




Cost Analysis



Sight, Thermal Weapon AN/PAS 13 (H) 1692 141 11399 AN/PAS 13B (V2) 7500 625 11999 Eng/Logistical Support 5

Thermal Imager Tactical Range 16087 1360 11828 Eng/Logistical Support 4 Intensifier, Image, Night Vision 17796 5932 3000 Eng/Logistical Support 181

Sight, Night Vision Mini 6097 1071 5692 Eng/Logistical Support 4

Goggles, Night Vision, Indiv 5314 1350 3936 Eng/Logistical Support 3



FY 09

February 2007Night Vision Equipment (493000)Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment

(4)

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08



Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07 Expanded Supplemental

Sight, Thermal WeaponAN/PAS 13 (H) - Heavy DRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL FP Ft. Belvoir, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 141 11399 YES N/A N/AAN/PAS 13B (V2) - Medium DRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL FP Ft. Belvoir, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 625 11999 YES N/A N/A

Thermal Imager Tactical Range DRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL FP Ft. Belvoir, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 1360 11828 YES N/A N/A

Intensifier. Image Night Vision ITT, Roanoke, VA FP Ft. Belvoir, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 5932 3000 YES N/A N/A Sight, Night Vision Mini TBD FP Quantico, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 1071 5692 YES N/A N/A

Goggles, Night Vision, Indiv ITT, Roanoke, VA FP Ft. Belvoir, VA Sep-07 Dec-08 1350 3936 YES N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Communications and Electronics Equipment (4) Night Vision Equipment (493000)

February 2007

REMARKS: Award Dates assume receipt of funding in the first month of the fiscal year.



ITEM

AN/PAS 13 (H)AN/PAS 13B (V2)Thermal Imager Tactical RangeIntensifier, Image, Night VisionSight, Night Vision, MiniGoggles, Night Vision, Indiv

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 141 141 A 141FY07 MC 625 625 A 625FY07 MC 1360 1360 A 1360FY07 MC 5932 5932 A 5932FY07 MC 1071 1071 A 1071FY07 MC 1350 1350 A 1350

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 141 141 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 31FY08 MC 625 625 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 105FY07 MC 1360 1360 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 230FY08 MC 5932 5932 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 992FY07 MC 1071 1071 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 181FY07 MC 1350 1350 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 230

AN/PAS 13B (V2)

Intensifier, Image, Night Vision

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

Thermal Imager Tactical RangeIntensifier, Image, Night Vision

ITEM

Sight, Night Vision, Mini

AN/PAS 13B (V2)

EachITT, Roanoke, VA 3 15 18550 1600 3400

DRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL

ITT, Roanoke, VATBD



200

Each200 800 1000 3 15 18 Each

15 18

BALANCE



200 800 1000 3Each

550


15 18

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Night Vision Equipment (493000)

Weapon System



Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

15

Date:February 2007

AN/PAS 13 (H)

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

Each3 18


Fiscal Year 09

800 1000

1600 3400 3

REMARKS: Items representing below MSR are also being procured with FY07/08 Core Funding. Total deliveries exceed MSR.

Calendar Year 08 Calendar Year 09BALANCEITEM

AN/PAS 13 (H)

Thermal Imager Tactical Range

Sight, Night Vision, MiniGoggles, Night Vision, Indiv

Goggles, Night Vision, Indiv

DRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL 200 800 1000 18 Each3 15


ITEM

AN/PAS 13 (H)AN/PAS 13B (V2)Thermal Imager Tactical RangeIntensifier, Image, Night VisionSight, Night Vision, MiniGoggles, Night Vision, Indiv

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY08 MC 141 110 31 11 20FY08 MC 625 520 105 52 53FY08 MC 1360 1130 230 113 117FY08 MC 5932 4940 992 494 498FY08 MC 1071 890 181 89 92FY08 MC 1350 1120 230 112 118

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

Sight, Night Vision, MiniGoggles, Night Vision, Indiv

Fiscal Year 10

Fiscal Year 12

Sight, Night Vision, Mini

Thermal Imager Tactical Range

Goggles, Night Vision, Indiv

ITEM

EachTBD 3 15 18200 800

BALANCE

EachDRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FLDRS Optronics, Palm Bay, FL



20012 15

100015



200 800 1000 3Each

200


12 15

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Night Vision Equipment (493000)

Weapon System


Intensifier, Image, Night Vision


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

12

Date:February 2007

AN/PAS 13 (H)AN/PAS 13B (V2)

Fiscal Year 11

ECONMSR

Each3 15


Fiscal Year 13

800 1000800 1000 3

REMARKS: Items representing below MSR are also being procured with FY07/08 Core Funding.


BALANCE

ITEMAN/PAS 13 (H)AN/PAS 13B (V2)Thermal Imager Tactical RangeIntensifier, Image, Night Vision

ITT, Roanoke, VA 550 1600 3400 Each3 12

ITT, Roanoke, VA 550 1600 3400 15 Each3 12

BLI No. 493000 Item No. Page 9 of 9 Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule

Date:



0206315M Force Service Support Group

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc Qty Gross Cost 0.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV

February 2007

Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $72.196 * $557.521 $69.985 $663.502

M1151/52/65 Expandable Capacity Vehicle (ECV): The M1151/52/65 are improved versions of the standard HMMWV with a heavier chassis and improved engine that enables the use of removable add-on-armor protection that provides greater tactical flexibility when deploying units.

* 36.2M of baseline funding was transferred from Title III to Title IX in the FY 07 appropriations bill.

Reason funds are required: Funds will be used to procure armored vehicles and tool kits required in support of on-going operations in OIF.Impact if funds are not provided: The requirement for armored HMMWVs will not be met, increasing the risk for Marines in theater.




Cost Analysis



HMMWV ECVs (M1151/M1152/M1165) & Ambulances (with armor)

69,985 386 181,308

Note: Awaiting final determination on quantities per type of vehicle and armorconfiguration.

TOTAL 69,985 ACTIVE 69,985 RESERVE

FY 09

February 20075/4T TRUCK HMMWVProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


HMMWV ECVs (M1151/M1152/M1165), Ambulances (with armor) & associated equipment

AM General Corp, South Bend, IN FFPO TACOM, Warren, MI Aug-07 Feb-08 386 181,308 Yes N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV

February 2007

REMARKS:

Note: This exhibit includes USMC quantities only.



ITEM

HMMWV ECVs

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 386 0 386 A 386

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 386 0 386 386 0

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

HMMWV ECVs M1151/M1152/M1165


Fiscal Year 09

Date:February 2007

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX


16

P-1 Item Nomenclature:5/4T TRUCK HMMWV

Weapon System

AM General Corp, South Bend, IN

BALANCE


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5

100 100 1000 10



6

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

HMMWV ECVs M1151/M1152/M1165


Date:



0206315M A


Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5 Motor Transportation Modifications

February 2007

The MTVR Armor System (MAS) Reducible Armor is being designed for the 7-ton MTVR. The kit will provide complete 360-degree protection as well as overhead and underbody protection for the crew compartment utilizing Mil-A-46100 High Hard Steel and Metal Composite. The MAS Reducible Armor (RA) is being designed to meet the Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) requirement of 98” reducible for MTVR with armor.

The Logistics Vehicle System (LVS) Marine Armor Kit II (MAK-II) is a complete redesign for the LVS cab structure utilizing a new frame with armor attachment points and integrated 360 degree protection. The MAK II will meet the Level 4 IED standard established in November 2006. Additional protection includes overhead and underbody armor utilizing Mil-A-46100 High Hard Steel and Mil-A-12560 Rolled Homogenous Armor. An air conditioning system is integrated into the system. ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total 0.0 163.600 52.000 215.600

Reason funds are required: Equipment is required for OIF and to reset the force to pre-war levels.Impact if funds are not provided: The current requirement for reducible armor to be loaded aboard the Maritime Prepositioning Fleet (MPF) shipping will not be met, thus armored MTVRs will not be able to be loaded aboard MPF shipping in the current cargo holds.Without the LVS Armor upgrade, crew safety will be jeopardized.




Cost Analysis



MTVR (Reducibile Armor) 27,500 VAR VAR

LVS Armor Upgrade 24,500 350 70

TOTAL 52,000ACTIVE 52,000RESERVE

FY 09

February 2007Motor Transportation ModsProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07MTVR Reducible Armor Oshkosh Truck, Oshkosh, WI FFPO MCSC, Quantico, VA Aug-07 Oct-07 VAR VAR Yes N/A N/ALVS Armor Upgrade MCLB Albany FFP MCLB Albany Jun-07 Dec-07 350 70 Yes N/A N/A

Note: Awaiting final configuration and quantities per type of MTVR Reducible Armor and LVS Armor upgrade from MCCDC.

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5 Motor Transportation Mods

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

LVS Armor Upgrade

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 350 350 A 350

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 350 350 25 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEMLVS Armor Upgrade

14


Fiscal Year 09

30 35

Date:February 2007

LVS Armor Upgrade

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

8


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

6

Appropriation Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control No. P-1 Item Nomenclature:Motor Transportation Mods

Weapon System

BALANCE


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5

EMCLB Albany - TBD



30

ITEM

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08


Date:



0206315M A

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5 MTVR

February 2007

Program Description:The MTVR is U.S. Marine Corps program to replace the existing medium tactical motor transport fleet of M809/M939 series truckswith cost-effective, state-of-the-art technologically improved trucks. The MTVR will have 22 years of economic useful life and markedly improved performance plus Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Durability (RAM-D). Major improvements include a new electronically controlled engine/transmission, independent suspension, central tire inflation, antilock brakes, traction control, corrosion control, and safety/ergonomic features. Includes requisite tool kits, and gun mounts. Includes assocated Tool Kits and Ring Mounts. The production contract is an IDIQ multi-year fixed price contract with an economic price adjustment. (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total $0.653 $15.226 $26.215M $42.094

Reason funds are required: Various MTVR, Ring Mounts and tool kits are required to replace vehicles lost in OIF.Impact if funds are not provided: MTVRs, tool kits and ring mounts will not be replaced resulting in a loss of mobility in support of OIF.




Cost Analysis



MTVRs (Wrecker/Dump/Cargo Variants) 26,090 122 213852MTVR Tool Kits/Ring Mounts 125 VAR VAR


FY 09

February 2007MTVRProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


MTVRs (Wrecker/Dump/Cargo Variants) OshKosh Truck Corporation FFPO MARCORSYSCOM Aug-07 Feb-08 122 213,852 Yes N/A N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5 MTVR

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

MTVRs (Wrecker/Dump/Cargo Variants)

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 122 122 A 122

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 122 122 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM

Oshkosh Truck, Oshkosh, WI



4

BALANCE


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / SUPPORT VEHICLES BA-5

E

Appropriation Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control No. P-1 Item Nomenclature:MTVR

Weapon System


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

6

Date:February 2007


Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E

10 16


Fiscal Year 09

15 20

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM



Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 Support Vehicles Logistical Vehicle Systems Replacement (LVSR)

February 2007

Program Description: Procure Tool Kits for the Logistical Vehicle System.Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR) trailer is required to retain the added lift capacity of the Logistics Vehicle System (LVS) tandem tow and to capitalize on the increased lift and mobility capabilities of the LVSR. The LVSR will be the prime mover for the LVSR trailer. The LVSR trailer shall be capable of accepting and securing the family of flatracks, standardized ISO containers up to 20 feet, and SIXCON tank and pump units. The flatracks, containers and SIXCONs shall be loaded onto and unloaded from the LVSR trailer using standard Marine Corps material handing equipment (MHE) and the LVSR load handling system. The M1076 PLS trailer is a 3 axle, wagon style trailer with a 16.5 ton payload capacity equipped with a flatrack that is interchangeable between truck and trailer. The combination of truck and trailer provides the combined payload capacity of 33 tons. The flatracks are lifted on and off the truck and trailer by a hydraulic powered arm mounted on the truck eliminating the need for additional material handling equipment. The controls for the arm are located inside the cab, allowing the operator to load or unload the truck in less than one minute without leaving the cab of the truck. The trailer can be loaded or unloaded in less than 5 minutes utilizing the remote arm control. Includes front power unit. (Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $46.883 $0.048 $16.8 $63.731 Reason funds are required: Funds are required to restore Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level. Impact if funds are not provided: Without replacement tool kits, these LVS systems currently in operation will not have proper logistics support or tools.




Cost Analysis



PLS TRAILERS 16800 240 70000


FY 09

February 2007Logistical Vehicle Sys Replacement Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


PLS Trailers Oshkosh Truck Corp, Oshkosh, WI FFP MCSC, Quantico VA Jul-07 Jan-08 240 70,000 Y N/A May-07

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 Logistical Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR)

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

PLS Trailers

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

7 MC 240 0 240 A 240

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

7 MC 240 0 240 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

PLS Trailers for LVSR

ITEM



6

BALANCE



5 15 20 9


15

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR)

Weapon System

Oshkosh Truck Corp, Oshkosh, WI


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

Date:February 2007

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E


Fiscal Year 09

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

PLS Trailers for LVSR


Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 Family of Tactical Trailers

February 2007

Family of Tactical Trailers, sustains the existing legacy of Tactical Trailer fleet including the M101 and M149 designed for the Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement; the M116A3 and M101A3 designed for the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle and the M870A2E1 designed for the Logistics Vehicle System/Logistical Vehicle System Replacement. MK969/970 Semitrailer Refueler 5000 Gallon an Aviation Refueler/Defueler towed by the MK31 Tractor to provide fuel to ground equipment and fixed/rotor-winged aviation assets.The M870 Family of Trailers are towed by the LVS to transport combat vehicles, heavy engineer equipment and perform recovery missions of downed aircraft.The MK31 is used to tow the MK970 Semitrailer Refueler 5000 Gallon. The MK970 is an Aviation Refueler/Defueler that is used to provide fuel to ground equipment and fixed/rotor-winged aviation assets.

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $12.610 $92.807 $2.818 $108.235

Reason funds are required:Funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level; funds equipment necessary to outfit and stand-up MARSOC units; funds combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items; funds training, equipment and housing for FSRG units and capabilities; and funds equipment for pre-deployment training. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.



Date:




Chassis, TRLR 3/4 T, 2-Whl A D 0.1Q 7

Trailer, Cargo 3/4 T 2-WHL A D 0.3Q 36

Trailer, Cargo 1 1/2T 2-WHL A D 0.6Q 60

Trailer, Tank, Water, 400 Gal 1 1/2T 2-WHL A D 0.2Q 17

Trailer, MTVR, Cargo A D 1.6Q 63

Totals 2.818

Family of Tactical Trailers

February 2007



Date:




Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 2.4 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 Support Vehicles Items Less Than $5M

February 2007

Marine Security Guard Vehicles- Provides various types of vehicles for the Marine Security Guard depending on the requirement of the command/country. The variety includes heavy duty vans, club wagons, caravans, landcruisers and mini-buses.

Various Jacks and Degreasers to provide required tools to Marines.

Military Motorcycle, 2-WHL M1030B1 - The Marine Corp uses the M1030B1 to transport messages, documents and light cargo between units as well as transporting forward observers, military police and reconnaissance personnel. FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY 2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total $2.857M $0.775M $2.37M $6.002M

Funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level and funds urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA-5 Support Vehicles


MSG Commercial Armored Vehicles A D 2.0

Q 20

Various Jacks, Degreasers A D 0.03

Q VAR

Military Motorcycle, 2-WHL, M1030B1 A D 0.3

Q 34

Totals 2.4

Items Less Than $5M

February 2007



Date:




Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT

February 2007

Environmental Control Equipment - The Environmental Control Equipment program procures refrigeration units and commercial air conditioners for cooling, dehumidifying, heating, filtering, and circulating air within electronic maintenance shops, radar systems, communications centers, and data computer systems.


Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Expanded Supplemental Total$2.030 $30.998 * $0.143 $33.171

Funds urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment; funds equipment necessary to outfit and stand-up MARSOC units; funds combat operations, force protection and replacement of equipment items; and funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.

*$7.4M was transferred from EOD systems baseline funding to this line item in Title IX. These funds will be realigned in execution.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / BA6


Refrigeration Unit/Rigid Box A D 0.049

Q VAR

Refrigerator Rigid Box 350CU FT A D 0.090

Q VAR

Totals 0.1 0.0

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT

February 2007



Date:




Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) Bulk Liquid Equipment

February 2007


FY 2008 Baseline FY 2008 FY 2008 Budget GWOT Total 3.662 13.189 16.851

Bulk Liquid Equipment: This line is a roll up line that contains the Lighweight Water Purifer, the Tactical Water Purification System (TWPS formerly the Enhanced Reverse Osmosis Water Purification Unit), and the Family of Water Supply Support Equipment. The Lightweight Water Purifer capability is necessary to provide safe and potable water to battalion sized or smaller units in an expeditionary or distributed operation environment. TWPS provides the Marine Air Ground Task Force with an enhanced capability to produce potable water from salt, brackfish, fresh and nuclear, biological and chemical contaminated water sources in expeditionary environments. The Family of Water Supply Support Equipment is comprised of 24 different items procured on a continuous buy. It includes all water assets associated with the sortage and distribution of potable water, such as tanks, pumps, showers, water heaters and water test sets.

Funds combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items; funds Distributed Operations; funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level; and funds equipment for pre-deployment training.



Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6)


Leightweight Water Purification Unit A D 2.2

Q 1

Tactical Water Purification System (TWPS) A D 4.5

Q 13

Bath Shower Unit Expeditionary Field A D 0.1

Q 5

Hypochlorination Unit, Purification A D 0.0

Q 2

Storage Water Tank Module (SIXCON) A D 0.1

Q 12

Tactical Water Distribution System A D 0.2

Q 9

Water Point Supply System A D 0.0

Q 2

Laundry Unit Field A D 0.6

Q 3

350 GPM Pump A D 0.1

Q 4

Tank, Fabric Collapsible 3K Bladder A D 0.1

Q 12

Hose Reel System A D 3.0

Q 7

Containerized Batch Laundry System A D 1.5

Q 8

Tactical Water Purification System Modules A D 0.7

Q 11

Totals 13.2

Bulk Liquid Equipment

February 2007



Date:



0206315M


Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) Tactical Fuel Systems

February 2007

FY 2007 (Dollars in Millions)Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total $5.042 $37.455 $0.168 $42.665

Tactical Fuel System: The Tactical Fuel System is a rolled line that contains highly versatile fuel systems designed to receive, store, transfer, and dispense fuel in support of Marine Air Ground Tactical Force (MAGTF) operations ashore. The fuel pump and storage modules are part of the SIXCON fuel distribution and storage system. The Fuel Pump Module has the pump, filters, and distribution hoses. Storage modules are 900-gallon storage tanks. Both are necessary to receive and distribute fuel to the operating forces either as stationary systems or as mobile refueling systems when mounted on medium and heavy logistics vehicles.

Reason funds are required: Equipment is required to support on-going combat operations in support of OIF and to restore this capability to pre-war levels.

Impact if funds are not provided: If funding is not provided, there will be a significant impact on MAGTF operations with loss of fuel storage, transfer, and dispensing capabilities. Without this capability a commander’s options will be limited when planning for fuel support of sea-based, distributed, or special operations and disallow the ability to conduct sustained combat operations.



Date:




Storage Tank Module A D 0.070

Q 3

Fuel Pump Module (Sixcon) A D 0.098

Q 8

Totals 0.168

Tactical Fuel Systems

February 2007



Date:




Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) Power Equipment Assorted

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2008 Baseline FY 2008 FY 2008Budget GWOT Total 4.188 91.080 95.268 Family of Power Equipment - This program includes mobile electric power equipment used throughout the Fleet Marine Forces and Reserves. These are centrally managed items. Sizes and types of Generators and Mobile Electric Power Distribution Systems range from 2 kW to 100 kW in both 60HZ and 400HZ. All generators are selected from the standard family of DoD Mobile Electric Power (MEP) sources. This is a Joint DoD program. Current generators are from the "Tactical Quiet Generator" (TQG) family. The generators are operationally linked with Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I), weapons systems, and all systems requiring electrical power. C4I systems are increasing in power demand, which continues to drive the demand for generators and power distribution sets. C4I and supported weapons systems readiness is directly affected as power equipment readiness decreases. Current average age of generators is greater than 20 years. This program is based on the continuous replacement of generators that have exceeded their life-cycles with ones that incorporate environmental, safety, and performance enhancements.

On-Board Vehicle Power (OBVP) will field upgraded alternators and wiring harnesses to HMMWVs and MTVRs in theater to provide increased electrical capacity necessary to power improved Counter-IED jammers and other on-board power accessories.

Funds urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment; funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level; funds training, equipping and housing for FSRG units and capabilities; funds combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items; funds equipment for pre-deployment; and funds equipment necessary to outfit and stand-up MARSOC units. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.



Date:




10KW Generators A D 3.0

Q VAR


Q VAR


Q VAR

22KW Magnum Generators A D 3.0

Q VAR

Power Converters/Supplies/Chargers A D 1.0

Q VAR

Renewable Energy A D 1.8

Q VAR

Totals 14.3

Power Equipment Assorted

February 2007




Cost Analysis



Onboard Vehicle Power/400 Amp Alternators 76800 6400 12,000 (HMMWV)


FY 09

February 2007




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY08Onboard Vehicle Power/400 Amp Alternators TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 6400 12000 Y N/A(HMMWV)


February 2007

REMARKS:



Date:

Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification Sheet February 2007Appropriation / Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Item Nomenclature:


0206315M Force Service Support Group (Marine Corps) A


Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 143.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 143.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 143.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) Physical Security Equipment

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 9.066 0.000 143.332 152.398 RAPID AEROSTAT INITIAL DEPLOYMENT (RAID)/GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (G-BOSS) is a program that provides a capability to provide persistent (24/7) tracking of objects of interest in the Marine forces’ continuous efforts to prevent or mitigate hostile actions and evolving threats associated with the Global War on Terror (GWOT) and 21st Century expeditionary military operations. RAID systems provides an organic remote imaging capability to be utilized in both offensive and defensive rolesacross all elements of the MAGTF. RAID systems provide base security cells with unique, 360°, high-resolution, day/night surveillance capability for enhanced target recognition and situational awareness which enables timely and appropriate response options (direct air attack, indirect fire, and ground patrol/attack). Each RAID system can operate independently and consists of three main components: elevated platform, multi-spectral sensor suite, and ground control station. The elevated platform is either a tower or an aerostat, depending on the specific operational requirements. The multi-spectral sensor suite consists of a mechanically stabilized, Electro-Optic/Infrared (EO/IR) sensor. The sensor consists of an EO color daytime camera, an IR black and white day or night camera, spotter scope and a laser range finder (LRF). The LRF with pointing azimuth precisely locates targets of interest out to 13km (personnel) or 20km (vehicles). Various Support Equipment - Provides for various security support equipment for the Combat Service Support elements of the Marine Air-Ground Combat Teams.Reason funds are required: The RAID/G-BOSS and various support equipment funds are requested to address a previously non-existent requirement to assist ground operating forces in their efforts to conduct Counter-Insurgency (COIN) operations in support of OIF/OEF and avoid additional losses of life and equipment.Impact if funds are not provided: If this initiative is not funded, it will negatively impact the Marine Corps intelligence infrastructure and its ability to meet evolving threats in the intelligence area.



Date:




Various Security Equipment A D 0.1 Cont ContQ

Totals 0.1

Physical Security Equipment

February 2007




Cost AnalysisRAID/G-BOSS

ID PRIOR CD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost


RAIDTOWER SYSTEM

TOWER 48600 120 405000SENSOR 75360 120 628000SOFTWARE 4800 VAR VARFIELDING/TRAINING 6600 VAR VARRF LINK 7871 VAR VAR



FY 09

February 2007Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6)

FY 06 FY 07 FY 08

BLI No. 643800


Cost Analysis

Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


FY07RAID Tower System U.S. Army Space & Missile FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jun-07 Aug-07 120 405000 Yes N/A N/ASensor U.S. Army Space & Missile FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jun-07 Aug-07 120 628000 Yes N/A N/A


February 2007

Physical Security Equipment

REMARKS:Collateral Equipment and Installations Physical Security Systems funding supports multiple worldwide Marine Corps Forward Operating Bases of various sizes.


Exhibit P-5A, Procurement History and Planning

ITEM

Raid Tower Systems

Sensor

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 120 120 A 20 20 8007 MC 120 120 A 20 20 80

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 120 80 20 20 20 2007 MC 120 80 20 20 20 20

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM

U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command



10

2

BALANCE



10 20 40 8

E


10

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Physical Security Equipment

Weapon System

U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

2

Date:February 2007

Raid Tower SystemsSensor

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E

8 10


Fiscal Year 09

20 40

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEMRaid Tower SystemsSensor


Date:



0206315M Force Service Support Group A

Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc Qty 420Gross Cost 0.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

February 2007

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2008 Baseline FY 2008 FY2008 Budget GWOT Total $3.157 $17.242 $20.399

FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENTThe Material Handling Equipment (MHE) line is a roll-up line that funds for the replacement/service life extension of Mobile Equipment Engineer Equipment which includes forklifts, cranes, and container handlers. The replacement/service life extension program has been developed on an as required basis since history has proven that many items of MHE have been maintained beyond the life expectancies developed and promulgated by Department of Defense (DoD) directives. This roll-up line includes funding for the the Extended Boom Forklift (EBFL), the Tractor, Rubber Tired, Articulated Steering, Multi-Purpose (TRAM) with buckets and fork attachments, the Next Generation Container Handler , the High Speed Mobile Crane (25 ton), Light Capability Rough Terrain Crane (7.5 ton) and the Engineer Equipment Trailer.

Funds combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.



Date:




Engineer Equipment Trailer A D 0.1

Q 1

Totals 0.1

FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

February 2007




Cost Analysis



Family of Material Handling Equipment

TRK, Forklift, Light 368 5 73600

All Terrain Crane (25 Ton) 10159 16 634938 Logistics Support 195

Tractor Multipurpose (TRAM) 5416 390 13889

TRK Forklift Varrible Reach (EBFL) 990 9 110000


FY 09

February 2007FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT





Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


TRUCK FORKLIFT LIGHT Terex, Westport, Ct MIPR DSCP, Philadelphia, PA Jan-08 Apr-08 5 73600 Yes No N/A

All Terrain Crane Terex, Westport, Ct FFP MCSC Quantico, VA Jan-08 Apr-08 16 634938 Yes No N/A

Tractor Multi-Purpose (TRAM) TBD FFP MCSC Quantico, VA Jan-08 Apr-08 390 13889 Yes No N/A

TRUCK FORKLIFT VARIBLE REACH JLG, McConnellburg FFP DSCP, Philadelphia, PA Jan-08 Apr-08 9 110000 Yes No N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

ALL TERRAIN CRANE

TRAM

Truck Forklift Light

Truck Forklift Varible Reach

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY08 MC 16 16 A 8 8FY08 MC 390 390 A 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 15FY08 MC 5 5 A 5FY08 MC 9 9 A 9

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM

TBD

Terex, Westport, CT

JLG McConnellsburg, PA



1

3

E

1 6 15 3 3 6 E

3 6

BALANCE



1 6 12 3

E

1


6

P-1 Item Nomenclature:FAMILY OF MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

Weapon System

Terex, Westport, CT


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

3

Date:February 2007

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E

3 6


Fiscal Year 09

6 25

6 25 3


BALANCE

ITEMALL TERRAIN CRANETRAM Tucks Forklift LightTruck Forklift Varible Reach


Production Schedule

REVISED

Date:





Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 730.7 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) EOD Systems

March 2007

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $7.406 $652.067 $730.664 $1,390.137 Family of EOD Equipment: The Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) mission provides a means to neutralize the hazards associated with explosive ordnance that are beyond the normal capabilities of other specialities that present a threat to operations, installations, personnel and material. The Family of EOD Equipment accomplishes this mission by detecting, identifying, rendering safe, recovering, evacuating and disassembling and or/disposing of unexploded ordnance with a variety of tools. EOD equipment includes: Demolition Sets, Assault Breacher Kits, Remote Control Devices, and Family of EOD items.Mine Resistant and Ambush Protected Systems (MRAPS) Vehicles: MRAPS vehicles increase the survivability and mobility of Marines and Soldiers operating in hazardous fire areas. The expanded use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) of various types and the continual use of rocket propelled grenades (RPGs) and small arms fire (SAF) in the area of operation requires a vehicle capable of surviving the IED/RPG/SAF threat. 807 vehicles of varying configurations (Category I, II and III) are required to meet different mission profiles. The three variants include the Mine Resistant Utility Vehicle (MRUV), Joint EOD Rapid Response Vehicle (JERRV) and the Buffalo Mine Protected Clearance Vehicle (MPCV). Funding includes required MRAPS subsystems. Z-Backscatter Van (ZBV) Ruggedization Upgrade: Removes the ZBV scanning equipment from the current COTS configured chassis and mounts it onto a military trailer that is more appropriate for use in theater operations. The ZBV is a low-cost, extremely maneuverable “drive-by” screening system that allows one or two operators to conduct X-ray imaging of suspect vehicles and objects. Counter Sniper Vehicle System: Includes vehicle systems configured to provide protection from sniper threats.Reason funds are required: Equipment is required to support on-going combat operations in support of OIF. Impact if funds are not provided: The Combat Engineers capability to perform mine detection with thru the wall capability will be greatly diminished and will expose Combat Engineers to greater risks when performing these missions. The lack of predeployment training assets will limit the initial training of new Combat Engineers deploying to Iraq and sustainment training for those returning to Iraq. The Combat Engineers capability to perform remote demolitions and explosives minefield/obstacles clearing in Iraq will be greatly diminished and will expose Combat Engineers to greater risks when performing these missions. The lack of predeployment training assets will limit the initial training of new Combat Engineers deploying to Iraq and sustainment training for those returning to Iraq. The Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) capability in Iraq will be greatly diminished in its ability to counter Unexploded Ordnance (UXO), IEDs, and WMDs and will expose EOD Technicians to greater risks when performing render safe procedures. The lack of predeployment training assets will limit the initial training of new EOD Technicians deploying to Iraq and sustainment training for EOD Technicians returning to Iraq. Marines will continue to suffer unnecessary casualties because they will be required to be transported in vehicles which are less able to survive landmine and IED blasts.



REVISED

Date:



Procurement Items Code UOM Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 To Complete Total Prog

Demolition Equipment A D 0.009

Q 36

Self Contained Breathing Apparatus A D 1.404

Q 137

Random Data Generator (EOD) A D 0.060

Q 36

EOD Team Field Operations Set A D 0.047

Q 9

MK34 Mod0 ARS A D 0.018

Q 18

MK1 Mod3 EOD Tool Set A D 0.005

Q 9

EOD Nuclear Weapons Detection Tool Kit A D 0.004

Q 9

Totals 1.547

EOD Systems

March 2007



REVISED

Exhibit P-5, Appropriation/ Budget Activity/Serial No: P-1 Line Item Nomenclature: Weapon System Type:

Cost Analysis

ID PRIOR YRSCD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost

$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $

MRAP- Category I Vehicles 125,770 194 648,300 MRAP- Category II Vehicles 175,655 224 784,175 MRAP- Category III Vehicles 16,941 18 941,180 MRAP Subsystems 347,481 1,241 280,000

Z-Backscatter Van Ruggedization 23,896 67 356,656

Counter Sniper Vehicle Systems 18,047 VAR VAR

Family of EOD SystemsMk41 Mod1 ARS 1,238 67 18,478 Mk40 Mod 0 Unexploded Ordnance 93 13 7,154 MK38 Mod 0 Small Caliber Dreamer (SCD) 9 9 1,000 Various EOD Tool Sets 4,057 Var VarFiring Device Demolityon - EOD Remote 3,400 Var Var

Demolition Firing Device (RDFD)Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device 1,088 8 136,000

(VBIED) Robot Field Replacement KitsVBIED Robot 10,674 16 667,125

Mk42 Mod 0 Medium Directional Energetic 568 78 7,282

Mk42 Mod 0 MDET Smokeless Power Bag 200 1 200,000



March 2007EOD SystemsProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6)

FY 07 FY08



REVISED

Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


MRAP CAT I Vehicles Various FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jun-07 Aug-07 194 648,300 Y N/A N/A

MRAP CAT II Vehicles Various FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jun-07 Sep-07 224 784,175 Y N/A N/A

MRAP CAT III Vehicles Force Protection Industries, Inc. FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Jun-07 May-08 18 941,180 Y N/A N/A

MRAP Subsystems Various FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Various Various 1241 280,000 Y N/A N/A

Z-Backscatter Ruggedization AS&E FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Aug-07 Jan-08 67 356,656 Y N/A N/A

Vehicel Borne Improvised Explosive Device Vertek, South Royalton, VT FFP RSJPO, Huntsville, AL Jun-07 Aug-07 16 667,125 Y N/A N/A(VBIED) Robot

*Quantities per CAT are being finalized.

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) EOD Systems

March 2007

REMARKS:



REVISED

ITEM

MRAPS Vehicles

MRAPS Vehicles

MRAP Subsystems

Z-Backscatter Van Ruggedization

VBIED Robot

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 194 0 194 A 194 007 MC 224 0 224 A 224 007 MC 18 0 18 A 18

Z-Backscatter Van Ruggedization 07 MC 67 0 67 A 67VBIED Robot 07 MC 16 0 16 A 2 2 12

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 194 007 MC 224 007 MC 18 18 4 4 4 4 2 007 MC 67 67 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 0

VBIED Robot 07 MC 16 4 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 0

Various EVariousVarious Various Various Various

Z-Backscatter Van Ruggedization

E

MRAPS CAT I Vehicles

MRAPS CAT I Vehicles

AS&E TBD TBD

Vertek, South Royalton, VT TBD

Various

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM

Fiscal Year 09

Various Various Various

TBD

TBD TBD

Initial Mfg PLT

Various

ECON

5

Date:March 2007

E

E

6


Various

TOTALReorder Mfg PLT

E

Calendar Year 07

5

Fiscal Year 07

10

BALANCE

Fiscal Year 06

2



Various Various Various

ALT After Oct 1

Manufacturer's NAME / LOCATION ALT Prior to Oct 1

MSR

6

MRAPS CAT III Vehicles

EOD SystemsAppropriation Code/CC/BA/BSA/Item Control No.

Unit of Measure

MAX

Weapon System

Force Protection Industries, Inc.


ITEM

Calendar Year 06

MRAPS CAT II Vehicles

MRAPS CAT II VehiclesMRAPS CAT III Vehicles

Fiscal Year 08


Date:




Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) 6522 - Field Medical Equipment

February 2007



FY 2007 5.224 6.902 0.692 19.318 Family of Field Medical Equipment (FFME): Family of Field Medical Equipment directly supports GWOT. Will provide first and second echelon medical and dental equipment supplies and medical care to the war fighter in the theater of operations. Programs such as Forward Resuscitative Surgery System (FRSS), Shock Trauma Platoon (STP), Field Operating Room, Digital Radiology, Aid Station, Combat Medical Bag, and Field Dental Operatory provide austere but adequate medical capabilities that will support the Marine Corps expeditionary mission delineated in Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare and Marine Corps Strategy 21. These capabilities are used extensively by Navy personnel attached to Marine Corps units in providing immediate support to critically wounded and injured Marines in Iraq. In addition, these assets have been utilized in Afghanistan and for earthquake relief in Pakistan. These assets are imperative for GWOT success. Funds equipment necessary to outfit and stand-up MARSOC units and funds restoration of Marine Corps unit capability to pre-war level.

Reason funds are required: Medical assets are utilized in OEF, OIF, and the Horn of Africa on a routine basis. Family of Field Medical sets provide the core capability for saving life and limb at the most far-forward areas of combat operations.

Impact if funds are not provided: Marines and Sailors are at risk for increased rates of severe injury and loss of life and limb.



Date:


Procurement Items Code Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 To Complete Total Prog

Aid Station D 0.3

Q 14

Combat Medical bag D 0.4

Q 195

Total 0.7

6522 - Field Medical Equipment

February 2007




Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) TRAINING DEVICES

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $61.338M $165.653M $110.043M $337.034M

Deployable Virtual Training Environment (DVTE) funding procures hardware computers for a first person immersive simulation based training system capable of emulating and simulating a wide variety of weapon systems and generating high fidelity, geo-specific 3D terrain databases. DVTE provides small unit echelons opportunity to continuously review, and rehearse Command and Control procedures (fire plans, control measures, key terrain association, etc) and concepts in a virtual environment. The DVTE will stimulate C4I systems in order to provide the C2 elements, at the battalion, (COC, FSCC, CIC) a transparent training ability utilizing operational C2 tools (AFATDS, DACT, FBCB2, TLHDS, PFED, etc). The Deployable Virtual Training Environment (DVTE) will sustain the individual and unit critical warfighting cognitive skills associated with the application of combined arms by the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) during “en-route” and deployed periods when Combined Arms Command & Control training historically cannot be performed.Reason funds are required: Failure to provide various training devices will result in lost training. The ability to provide the operating forces as well as school houses with the necessary training aids to conduct realistic tactics, techniques and procedures will be diminished.

Impact if funds are not provided: Failure to fund will not allow Marines to train on the threat weapons currently being used in Operation Iraqi Freedom. It will also not allow system enhancements to meet the current threat environment and lead to decreased trainer availability. The Marine Corps will have a loss in capability needed to conduct critical training in support of the OIF and to participate as a full-fledged player in JTAC/FO training.

BLI No. 653200 Item No. 79 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit P-40,


Date:


February 2007


Homestation (HS) Pre-Deploymnet Training Phase II - Breakout as follows:

Range Modernization & Transformation (RMT) Program (HS) funding continues modernizing major USMC base and station live training ranges enabling them to conduct Pre-deployment Training Phase I/II by providing enhanced after action review with ground truth feedback, realistic representation of opposing forces (OPFOR) and enhanced range and exercise control capabilities. Integrating live and simulated training technologies, the fielded capabilities enhance live-fire, force-on-target, and force-on-force training. Major system components of modernization include Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) facilities, inter-active target, battlefield effects simulators, individual and vehicle tracking systems, aviation tracking systems, MILES, simulated munitions, integrated simulation (Intelligence components), and range control and exercise control information processing and situational awareness displays to be used in Pre-Deployment Exercises. The home stations that will benefit from these projects are Marine Corps Bases Camp Pendleton (CA), Camp Lejeune (NC), Camp Butler (Japan), Hawaii, Quantico (VA) and Marine Corps Air Stations Yuma (AZ) and Cherry Point (NC). This request is the third phase of home station modernization andwill continue to enhance the capabilities provided in Phase I and II and give deploying units the opportunity to better meet training requirements before exercising as larger Marine Air-Ground Task Forces (MAGTF) and deploying to the combat theaters.Range Modernization & Transformation (RMT) Program (29 Palms) funding modernizes MAGTFTC (MCAGCC, Twenty-nine Palms, CA / MWTC, Bridgeport, CA) Mojave Viper Predeployment Training Phase III/IV live training exercises by providing enhanced after action review with ground truth feedback, realistic representation of OPFOR and enhanced range and exercise control capabilities. Integrating live and simulated training technologies, the fielded capabilities enhance live-fire, force-on-target, and force-on-force training. Majorsystem components of modernization include Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) facilities, inter-active targetry, battlefield effects simulators, individual and vehicle tracking systems, aviation tracking systems, MILES, simulated munitions, integrated simulation, range control and exercise control information processing, situational awareness displays, and associated infrastructure upgrades.

Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System 2000 (MILES 2000) is a joint interest program between the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Army. It is the premier Tactical Engagement Simulation System and provides a family of low power, eye safe lasers which simulates the direct fire characteristics of infantry small arms, assault, armor, anti-armor mechanized weapons system and provides the gunner with hit or miss determination. MILES 2000 is designed to be used by the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) as a force-on-force engagement simulation training system. MILES 2000 is the major component that the United States Marine Corps using for the Range Instrumentation initiative. . This is a new emergent and immediate requirement that includes quantities for instrumented MILES 2000 to be fielded for Mojave Viper exercises at MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA.

VARIOUS Training Devices represents the procurement of multiple training devices for support of OIF. Various Training Devices include:Improvised Explosive Devices/Counter Improvised Explosive Devices (IED/CIED) training initiative funds a wide spectrum of training devices used to simulate Improvised Explosive Devices and their various countermeasures. Both pyrotechnic and non-pyrotechnic configurations, both operational and simulated countermeasure devices, these devices provide a safe, effective, efficient means of replicating the audible and visual effects of an IED event. In addition, this initiative provides training devices that replicate the characteristics and effects of various countermeasures such as the Counter Remote Electronic Warfare (CREW) systems and modified IED Countermeasure Equipment (mICE) as well as the training support necessary to integrate these devices into training Program of Instructions (POIs) and range operations.Reconfigurable Vehicle Simulator(RVS) Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement – Operator Driver Simulator (MTVR-ODS)) trains vehicle operators. The trainer uses a manufactured cab with an MTVR specific dash set. The systems include three degrees of freedom seat motion for the driver and 180 degrees of visual display.

BLI 653200 Item No. 79 Page 2 of 5P40(2)


Date:


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equip (6)


Deployable Virtual Training Environment (DVTE) A D 2.9 0.0 2.9

IED/CIED Training A D 4.4 0.0 4.4

Reconfigurable Vehicle Simulator (RVS) A D 1.0 0.0 1.0

Totals 8.342 5.4

TRAINING DEVICES

February 2007

BLI No. 653200 Item No. 79 Page 3 of 5 Exhibit P-40a,



Cost Analysis



Homestation Pre-Deployment Training PH IIIncludes 1 and 2 below:

1- Range Modernization & Transformation AProgram (HS)Multiple major USMC base and station expansions, various quantities and configurations.

Camp Pendleton Homestation MOUT Expansion 20000 VAR VARCamp Lejeune Homestation MOUT Expansion 14000 VAR VARMCB Hawaii Homestation MOUT Expansion 5000 VAR VARMCB Quantico Homestation MOUT Expansion 10000 VAR VARCamp Butler, Okinawa Japan MOUT Expansion 2500 VAR VARMCAS Cherry Point, NC MOUT 3662 VAR VARMCAS-1 Yuma, AZ MOUT Expansion 11000 VAR VAR

2- Range Modernization & TransformationProgram (29P) AMultiple major USMC base and station expansions, various quantities and configurations.

CAMOUT Non-Permanent, Reconfigurable Buildings 20000 VAR VARMWTC MOUT Expansion 5000 VAR VARMAWTS MOUT FOB 627 VAR VAR

MILES A

Vehicle Kits 4562 239 19085

Individual Manworn Kits 4200 1 4200

Small Arms Laser Transmitters 1150 1 1150

101701TOTAL 101701ACTIVERESERVE

FY 09

February 2007TRAINING DEVICESProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6)


BLI No. 653200 Item No. 79 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit P-5, Cost Analysis

Date:


WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and LocationContract Method

Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit CostSpecs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


MILES

MILES Vehicle Kits TBD FFP TRASYS, Orlando, FL Feb-07 May-07 239 19085 Y N Jan-07MILES Individual Manworn Kits TBD FFP TRASYS, Orlando, FL Feb-07 May-07 1 4200 Y N Jan-07MILES Small Arms Laser Transmitters Kits TBD FFP TRASYS, Orlando, FL Feb-07 May-07 1 1150 Y N Jan-07


February 2007

REMARKS:

BLI No. 653200 Item No. 79 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit P-5A,


Date:



0206315M A



Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / ENGINEER AND OTHER EQIPMENT (6) Container Family

February 2007

The Container Family provides the Fleet Marine Force with a fully intermodal transport capability emphasizing dimensional standardization and International Organization for Standardization compatibility. Two types of containers are procured, Pallet and Quadruple. The containers are end items and assets owned by the unit, expeditionary in nature. Components for the containers such as racks, horizontal connectors and inserts are not end items and do not have Acquisition Objectives. Containers will replace locally assembled prefabricated wooden mount out boxes and flat and box pallets. The containers will be used to support storage and movement of organizational property and consumable supplies, provide field, garrison and shipboard warehousing, and facilitate ship-to-shore movement. (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $2.998 $7.741 $2.172 $12.911

Reason funds are required: Equipment is required for OIF and to reset pre-war capabilities.Impact if funds are not provided: Failure to fund this effort would result in a deficiency in containers. The MEF container quantities are currently well under operational requirements, and many units have washed out due to service during OIF/OEF.



Date:




QUADCONS A D 1.0

Q 397

PALCONS A D 1.1

Q 1,114

Totals 2.2

CONTAINERS

February 2007



Date:





Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc QtyGross Cost 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

February 2007

Program Justification: ($ in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total 19.972 98.914 45.000 163.886

Family of Construction Equipment: The Family of Construction Equipment (FCE) line is a roll-up line that provides for the replacement/service life extension program (SLEP) of all United States Marine Corps construction equipment. This line provides for the funding of the Scraper 621B, Tractor, Road Grader 130G, Backhoe Loader (BHL), Dozer D7G (SLEP), Medium Crawler Tractor, Winch attachment (SLEP), Compressor 260 cubic feet per minute (CFM), Survey Set General Purpose (with Laser Leveling), Automatic/Ultimate Building Machine, Marine Corps Tactical Welding Shop, Runway Sweeper, Dozer W/angle Blade 1150, Dozer W/Bucket 1155 (Multi Terrain Tractor), Engineer Equipment Trailer, Airfield Damage Repair and Dust Abatement System.

Reason funds are required: Equipment is required to support on-going combat operations in support of OIF.

Impact if funds are not provided: Without a reasonable replacement program the Marine Corps will experience continued low equipment readiness and high maintenance costs. The remaining FCE equipment identified in this request are needed to accomplish significant general and civil construction tasks that are required in support of OIF.




Cost Analysis

ID PRIOR YRS

CD TotalCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost TotalCost Qty UnitCost$OOO $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $ $OOO Each $

Tractor Full Track Medium 45,000 100 450,000

TOTAL 4500045000

RESERVE

FY 09

February 2007Family of Construction Equipment

FY 08


FY 06 FY 07Weapon System Cost

Elements



Date:


WBS Cost Elements: Contractor and Location Contract Method Location of PCO Award Date Date of First QTY Unit Cost Specs

Avail?Date

RevsnRFP Issue

DateFiscal Years and Type Delivery Each $ Avail

Tractor Full Track MediumFY07 TBD FFP MCSC, Quantico, VA Aug-07 Feb-08 100 450,000 Yes N/A N/A

February 2007

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

REMARKS:

Bli No. 654400 Item No. 81 Page 3 of 4Exhibit P-5A,


ITEM

TRACTOR FULL TRACK MEDIUM

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 100 0 100 A 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20

00

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 100 80 20 10 10 00

Fiscal Year 07

Fiscal Year 09

ITEM


6

Reorder Mfg PLT

BALANCE



TBD TBD TBD 10

Weapon System


ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX


TBD

Date:February 2007

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

16

P-1 Item Nomenclature:FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

Tractor Full Track Medium

Fiscal Year 08

ECONMSR

E


Fiscal Year 10Calendar Year 09 Calendar Year 10

BALANCE

ITEMTractor Full Track Medium

Bli No. 654400Item No. 81 Page 4 of 4


Date:



0206623M A


Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total ProgProc Qty 66 0Gross Cost 0.0 7.9 0.0 Cont. Cont.

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) Internally Transportable Vehicle

February 2007

FY 2007 Program Justification: (Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY07 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $2.747 $10.845 $7.875 $21.467

Internally Transportable Vehicles - This funding will be used to procure the Internally Transportable Vehicle (ITV), associated spare parts, special tools, and initial training. The ITV will be a MV-22 Osprey internally transportable system that replaces the Interim Fast Attack Vehicle (IFAV), and provides infantry, reconnaissance, and special operations forces with a vehicle which can be vertically transported at the ranges and speeds required to support them. The ITV will be used by reconnaissance units, the Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) Ground Combat Element (GCE), and Special Operations Command (SOC) units. The ITV program is a USMC led, joint program with the US Special Operations Command.

Reason funds are required: The ITV program will support Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in providing Special Operation Forces with a ground mobility platform, transportable in the CV-22 and MH-47 aircraft, to support special reconnaissance, direct action, unconventional warfare, foreign internal defense, counter-terrorism, personnel recovery and anti-terrorism.

Impact if funds are not provided: Without this capability, Marines will be inserted over 100 nautical miles without a means to carry critical equipment, ammunition and supplies beyond that which can be carried on their backs. This lack of a transportation asset severely limits mobility and time on the ground. These limitations to forward reconnaissance assets degrade the ability of the battlefield commander to make informed decisions. Additionally, a severe limitation is placed on the mission profile of the MV-22 because the capability developed as the primary on board end item would not be available.




Cost Analysis



Internally Transportable Vehicle 7875 66 119318


FY 09

February 2007Internally Transportable VehicleProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and other Equipment (6)




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


ITV General Dynamics, St. Petersburg, FL FFP MARCORSYSCOM,

Quantico, VA Aug-07 Sep-07 66 119318 YES NO Mar-04

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and other Equipment (6) Internally Transportable Vehicle

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

ITV

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

07 MC 66 66 A 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

REMARKS:


BALANCE

ITEM


Fiscal Year 10

Date:February 2007

Interally Transportable Vehicle

Fiscal Year 08

ECONMSR

E


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX


11

P-1 Item Nomenclature:Internally Transportable Vehicle

Weapon System

GENERAL DYNAMICS / St. Petersburg, FL

BALANCE


Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and other Equipment (6)

2 3 12 10



1

ITEM

Fiscal Year 07

Fiscal Year 09


Date:






Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc


Initial Spares


Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) /Engineer and Other Equipment (6) 6613 - Family of Combat Field Feeding System

February 2007

The Field Food Service System (FFSS) and Enhanced Tray Ration Heater System (E-TRHS) are parts of the Family of Combat Field Feeding System. The FFSS combines the Marine Rapid Deployment Kitchen (MRDK) and the Field Sanitation Unit (FSU). It can be positioned with elements of the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) and is capable of preparing more than 850 meals in a four-hour period. The MRDK provides flexiblity in feeding maneuver elements of an infantry battalion dispersed over a wide area by utilizing the supported units insulated food and beverage containers for transport. The FSU provides the capability to clean and sanitize food service equipment as well as miscellaneous food service components, while providing sufficient hot water for general sanitation.


Baseline Budget Title IX Supplemental Total FY2007 5.126 2.598 0.391 8.115

Reason funds are required: The Marine Corps requires an intermediate food service capability that supports a broad spectrum of rations, which is logistically supportable. The preferred option is a trailer type of design that is primarily operated by JP-8 vice electricity. Off the shelf systems exist, that would only require modification to configuration to support JP-8 fired heating plant used by Marine Corps for other Food Service Equipment to reduce the training and logistic burden on the using unit. This will drastically reduce the electrical footprint and movement issues associated with the FFSS.

Impact if funds are not provided: Without the capability to prepare UGR-A rations commands are going to continue to be faced with the logistic demands to use vehicles to transport "Hot-Chow" to smaller locations with the inherent threat and loss to personnel and transportation assets.



Date:




Enhanced Tray Ration Heating Systems A D 0.3

Q 10

Range Outfit, FLD, Gasoline, B-Pack A D 0.1

Q 46

Accessory Outfit, FLD Range, Gasoline A D 0.016

Q 26

Totals 0.4

6613 - Family of Combat Field Feeding System

February 2007



Date:




Prior Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Prog

Proc Qty

Gross Cost 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont Cont

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont ContInitial Spares

Total Proc Cost 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cont ContFlyaway U/CWpn Sys Proc U/C

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) 6670 - Items Less Than $5Million

February 2007

FY 2007 (Dollars in Millions)Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Bridge Supplemental Total$10.418 $26.891 $18.191 $55.500

Items under $5 Million is a roll up line that consist of the following:

Interim Vehicle-Mounted Mine Detector (IVMMD) Mine Detection Vehicle (MDV) Meerkat/Husky ($18.0M). The Interim Vehicle Mounted Mine Detector (IVMMD) is a vehicle-mounted metallic mine detection system that is composed of mine, a detection vehicle, detonation trailers with prime mover and support packages. The lead vehicle (Meerkat) is a single-occupant two-wheel drive vehicle that serves as the primary mine detection vehicle. The trailer system (Husky) is a single occupant four-wheel drive vehicles that acts as the prime mover for the full width mine proofing/detonation trailers. It can also serve as an alternate detection vehicle.

Alternative Power Sources for Communication Equipment (APSCE) The Soldier Portable Charger (SPC) is a state of the art portable battery charger designed for field use. The SPC is capable of charging 8 batteries in 8 hours.

Decontamination System, LTWT: The Decontamination System is a lightweight system that allows uses to decontaminate themselves if he/she has been to exposed to chemical agents.

Funds urgently needed equipment critical for mission accomplishment and funds combat operations, force protection, and replacement of equipment items. Funds can be executed in a 12 month funded delivery period.

Bli No. 667000Item No. 86 Page 1 of 5


Date:




Decontamination System, LTWT A D 0.164

Q 13

Lighting Set, Helicopter, Portable A D 0.001

Q 3

Charger, Battery (Soldier Portable) A D 0.026

Q 13

Total 0.191

6670 - Items Less Than $5Million

February 2007




Cost Analysis



Interim Vehicle-Mounted Mine Detector (IVMMD) Mine Detection Vehicle (MDV) Meerkat/Husky

18000 9 2000000


FY 09

February 20076670 - Items Less Than $5MillionProcurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6)




Date:



Specs Avail?

Date Revsn

RFP Issue Date


Interim Vehicle-Mounted Mine Detector (IVMMD) Mine Detection Vehicle (MDV) Meerkat/

Critical Solutions, International, CSI, Dallas, TX MIPR TACOM, Warren MI Jul-07 Jan-08 9 2000000 Yes No N/A

Procurement, Marine Corps (1109) / Engineer and Other Equipment (6) 6670 - Items Less Than $5Million

February 2007

REMARKS:



ITEM

IVMMD

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 9 0 9 A 9

FY

SVC

QTY

DEL

BAL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

FY07 MC 9 0 9 9 0

Fiscal Year 06

Fiscal Year 08

ITEM



6

BALANCE



1 6 30 9


15

P-1 Item Nomenclature:6670 - Items Less Than $5Million

Weapon System

Critical Solutions, International, CSI, Dallas, TX


Reorder Mfg PLT

Initial Mfg PLT

ALT After Oct 1

ALT Prior to Oct 1

MAX

Date:February 2007

IVMMD

Fiscal Year 07

ECONMSR

E


Fiscal Year 09Calendar Year 08 Calendar Year 09

BALANCE

ITEMIVMMD






PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS\BA 1


Prior Years ID Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Program

Quantity Cont Cont

Cost ($M) $0.0 A $0.0 $15.6 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Cont Cont

015100, AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES

February 2007

MISSION DESCRIPTION: Airborne Rockets, All Types the procurements are to establish an inventory of rocket components in accordance with the NNOR and to maintain those inventory levels as training and combat usage occurs.


FY2007Baseline FY2007 FY2007 FY2007Budget Title IX Supplemental Total*$15.4 $0.0 $15.6 $31.0

REASON FUNDS ARE REQUIRED:Over 18,800 2.75 inch rockets have been expended from both fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft during OIF and OEF. The bulk of these expenditures used High Explosive (HE) warheads (M229). Funding is required to replenish inventory expended in support of these operations. The MK146, a modified M229, is an improved 17Ib HE warhead with insensitive munitions (IM) characteristics. It uses less sensitive explosives in the warhead and fuze and also uses venting on both ends to improve cook-off reaction. It provides improved lethality with more fragments and higher fragment velocity.

Over 800 5.00 inch rockets have been expended in support of OIF and OEF. This funding is requested to replace inventory expenditures and reset the force. This funding will be used to replenish both 5 inch rocket motors and warheads.

The impact if funds are not provided will be that annual training usage in addition to wartime expenditures will have depleted the inventory of HE warheads.

Acquiring light weight launchers to use on the UH-1 to enhance their operational capability in hot climates in support of the GWOT.

*Includes funding for entire Airborne Rockets Program.


P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 3CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit P-5 Cost Analysis DATE:

AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPESAPPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE


Cost Code Element of Cost Prior Years


Q5080 MK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD A 8,000 1,272.86 10,183

TBD LIGHT WEIGHT LAUNCHER A 150 7,533.33 1,130

Q5041 MK71 ROCKET MOTOR A 800 4,300.00 3,440

Q5897 WTU-11/B A 800 444.00 355

Q5830 PRODUCTION ENG SUPPORT A 445

Total 15,553

ID Code

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1

Weapon SystemFebruary 2007


FY 2007FY 2006 FY 2009FY 2008

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDDD FORM 2446, JUN 86

P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 3(Exhibit P-5, page 2 of 5)


BUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System A. DATEAIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES



Cost Element/FiscalYear Qty Unit Cost Location of PCO RFP Issue Date

Contract Method &

Type Contractor and Location Award DateDate of First

DeliverySpecs

Available NowDate Revisions

Available

MK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD

2007 8,000 1,272.86 NAVAIR N/A PXNSWC INDIAN HEAD DIV, INDIAN HD MD 07/2007 01/2009 YES

MK71 ROCKET MOTOR

2007 800 4,300.00 NAVAIR N/A PXNSWC INDIAN HEAD DIV, INDIAN HD MD 07/2007 01/2009 YES

WTU-11/B

2007 800 444.00 NAVAIR N/A PXNSWC INDIAN HEAD DIV, INDIAN HD MD 07/2007 01/2009 YES

LIGHT WEIGHT LAUNCHER

2007 150 7,533.33 NAVAIR N/A PX TBD 07/2007 01/2009 YES

Notes:

February 2007

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS\BA 1 J1Q5

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDDD Form 2446-1, JUL 87

P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 3 (Exhibit P-5A, page 3 of 5)

FY 07 DON BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREPROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 015100, AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES


Item Name and Location MSR ECON MAX to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total MeasureMK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD NSWC, IH 1 8 15 *9 18 18 27 K


ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B CALENDAR YEAR 2006 CALENDAR YEAR 2007Y V

CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD N 8.0 0.0 8.0 A 8.0



CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD N 8.0 0.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.5

Remarks:


311 / 244 ITEM NO. 3 PAGE NO. 4 Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule

2005

FY 07 DON BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREPROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 015100, AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES


Item Name and Location MSR 1-8-5 MAX to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total MeasureMK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD NSWC, IH 1 8 15 9 18 18 27 K



CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MK146 (M229) HE WARHEAD N 8.0 6.5 1.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0

ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B 2011 CALENDAR YEAR 2013Y V

CTY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

Remarks:


311 / 244 ITEM NO. 3 PAGE NO. 5 Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule

CALENDAR YEAR 2012







Prior Years ID Code FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Program

Quantity

Cost ($M) $0.0 A $0.0 $8.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $8.0

REASON FUNDS ARE REQUIRED:

018200 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES

February 2007

MISSION DESCRIPTION:

The Airborne Expendable Countermeasures (AECM) line provides funding for procurement of countermeasure self-protection devices for all Navy and Marine Corps tactical, rotary and other fixed-wing aircraft. The AECM Program is divided into the following threat related categories: (a) air-launched chaff, (b) Radio Frequency (RF) Active Jammers, (c) infrared (IR) decoys, (d) associated impulse cartridges, and (e) support costs. Procurement of unique 1x1 x8" countermeasures are in support of the USMC C-130J. These items are RR170A, operational chaff; MJU61 magnesium fueled flare, which is a reliability and safety improvement of the M206 flare; MJU-64, pyrophoric decoy device, which is a reliability and safety improvement of the MJU50; and CCU145A Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation on Ordnance (HERO) safe impulse cartridge, which replaces the BBU35.

The MJU49 is currently used by all naval aircraft except the C130J. The pyrophoric metal payload consists of hundreds of very thin metal foils stacked on top of each other, which have been chemically treated to be air reactive and produce infrared energy in the appropriate bands. The MJU49 is covert in nature and does not highlight aircraft position when functioned.

OIF/OEF aircraft are continually exposed to surface-to-air missiles (SAMS) and/or man portable air defense systems (MANPADs). The MJU-49 is the most capable decoy flare in defeating the known in theater threats and is in great demand. FY2007 Baseline Budget FY 2007 Title IX FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2007 Total $72.6 $0.0 $8.0 $80.6

145,185 MJU49 devices have been consumed in support of combat operations during FY06 (through 25Aug06). This represents an average of 443 per day this FY. 99% of MJU49 total consumption during FY06 was in support of combat operations. Because of fleet demand and limited availability, there is a moratorium on the use of MJU49 devices for training.

Alloy Surfaces is the sole source vendor for this type countermeasure. Additional funds are needed to ensure production remains at the current level of 18K per month with no break in production.


P-1 SHOPPING LISTITEM NO 8

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit P-40, page 1 of 4)


Exhibit P-5 Cost Analysis DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE018200 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES

Cost Code Element of Cost Prior Years


QA190 MJU-49/B A 69,113 115.26 7,966

Total 0 0 7,966 0 0

ID Code

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1

Weapon SystemFebruary 2007


FY 2007FY 2006 FY 2009FY 2008

DD FORM 2446, JUN 86P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 8(Exhibit P-5, page 2 of 4)


BUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System A. DATE


018200 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES Y1QA

Cost Element/FiscalYear QtyUnit Cost

($000) Location of PCO RFP Issue Date

Contract Method &

Type Contractor and Location Award DateDate of First

DeliverySpecs

Available NowDate Revisions

Available

IR DECOYS

MJU-49/B DECOY DEVICE

2007 69,113 115.26 NAVICP 10/1/2006 SS-FPALLOY SURFACES CO, ASTON, PA 6/1/2007 9/15/2007 YES

February 2007


Notes:

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87P-1 SHOPPING LIST

ITEM NO 8 (Exhibit P-5A, page 3 of 4)

FY 07 PBIS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE, P-21 DATE February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Weapon System P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREPROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 018200 AIRBORNE EXPENDABLE C/M


Item Name and Location MSR 1-8-5 MAX to Oct 1 Oct 1 Mfg PLT Mfg PLT Total Measure

MJU-49B Alloy, Chester Twnsh, PA 6 18 18 8 3 11 K

FISCAL YEAR 2006 FISCAL YEAR 2007ITEM / MANUFACTURER F S Q D B CALENDAR YEAR 2006 CALENDAR YEAR 2007

Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MJU-49B (ALLOY) 07 69.1 69.1 A 3.7 65.4


Y VC

TY

EL

AL

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

BAL

MJU-49B (ALLOY) 07 69.1 3.7 65.4 18 18 18 11.4

Remarks:

DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete

311 / 244

2005

P-1 SHOPPING LISTITEM NO 8

Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule(page 4 of 4)


P-40 February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 5"/54 GUN AMMUNITIONProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsSUBHEAD NO. A1AC BLIN: 025000


QUANTITYCOST(In Millions) $0.0 $11.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $11.0



UNCLASSIFIED

ITEM DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:

5"/54 ammunition is fired from cruiser and destroyer type of combatant ships against air, surface, and shore targets. Program procures three types of propelling charges, five types of high-explosiveprojectiles, two specialty projectiles, two pure training rounds and several ancillary rounds (dummy, gage and test). Program also supports newly developed multi-function fuze and multi-option fuzemodernization.

Reason funds are required: Funds are required to replace 5"/54 ammunition used in preparation and maintaining presence in OperationIraqi Freedom.

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $26.9 $0.0 $11.0 $37.9


P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 025000 5"/54 GUN AMMUNITION

SUBHEAD NO. A1ACTOTAL COST IN DOLLARS


Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

AC100

5"/54 AMMUNITION COMPONENTS5"/54 CHG, PROP, FULL, MK 67, D326 11,289 654.02 7,383,232PROJ,5/54 KE-ET DA15 3,456 1046.47 3,616,768

SUBTOTAL (PAGE 1 OF P5) 0 11,000,000 0 0DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED


February 2007B. APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY C. P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE SUBHEAD

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 5"/54 GUN AMMUNITION A1ACBLIN: 025000


AC100

5"/54 AMMUNITION COMPONENTS5"/54 CHG, PROP, FULL, MK 67, UNIVERSAL D326FY 2007 11,289 654.02 JMC ROCK ISLAND Oct-06 MIPR UNKNOWN Mar-07 Jan-09 YES

PROJ,5"/54 KE-ET DA15FY 2007 3,456 1046.47 JMC ROCK ISLAND Oct-08 MIPR UNKNOWN Feb-07 Sep-09 NO Nov-06

D. REMARKS

NOTE: All items shown are priced with available GFM.

DD Form 2446-1, JUL 87 P-1 SHOPPING LIST Classification:ITEM NO. 10 PAGE NO. 3 UNCLASSIFIED

Procurement Ammunition Navy & Marine Corps February 2007

1 Navy Ammunition 5"/54 GUN AMMUNITION A1ACFiscal Year 2006 Fiscal Year 2007 Fiscal Year 2008

Item/Mfr Acc Bal CY 05 Calendar Year 2006 Calendar Year 2007 Calendar Year 2008

Prior Due Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

FY 06 FY 06

AC100 D326 - 5"/54 CHG, PROP, FULL, MK 67, UNIVERSAL

UNKNOWN 07 K N 11.3 11.3 A 11.3

TOTALS 11.3 11.3 11.3

Procurement Lead TimeAdmin Lead Time Manu- TotalPrior After facturing After

UNKNOWN 1-Oct 1-Oct time 1-OctInitial 5 5 22 27Reorder (Previous Source) 5 5 22 27

P-1 Item Shopping List Item No Page No10 4

500007500 25000

Remarks:

Later

P-1 Item Nomenclature

Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog Qty

Subhead No.Budget Activity

PrgYr

Oct 1

Manufacture's Name and LocationProduction Rates

Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule





FY 09 FY09

AC100 D326 - 5"/54 CHG, PROP, FULL, MK 67, UNIVERSAL

UNKNOWN 07 K N 11.3 11.3 11.3

TOTALS 11.3 11.3 11.3




7500 25000 50000

Remarks:

Later


Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog Qty


PrgYr

Oct 1


Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule





FY 09 FY 09

AC100 DA15 - PROJ,5"/54 KE-ET

UNKNOWN 07 K N 3.5 3.5 A 3.5

TOTALS 3.5 3.5 3.5




60002500 3000

Remarks:

Later


Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog

Qty


PrgYr

Oct 1


Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule





FY 09 FY 09

AC100 DA15 - PROJ,5"/54 KE-ET

UNKNOWN 07 K N 3.5 3.5 3.5

TOTALS 3.5 3.5 3.5




2500 3000 6000

Remarks:

Later


Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog

Qty


PrgYr

Oct 1


Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule



PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITIONProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsSUBHEAD NO. A1AL BLIN: 026600





UNCLASSIFIED


The intermediate caliber cartridge is a family of fixed rounds of ammunition for use in shipboard intermediate caliber gun weapon systems (GWS). Navy's primary use for an intermediate caliber GWS will beto address both surface and air targets. United States Coast Guard's (USCG) primary use is drug interdiction, homeland defense, and Visit, Board, Search and Seize (VBSS). Intermediate caliber GWS arecurrently employed on US Navy guided missile frigates (FFGs) and US Coast Guard Cutters. An intermediate caliber GWS is designated for use on the new Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) and DD(X) class ofUS Navy ships and the USCG National Security Cutter. The program procures both High Explosive service rounds as well as Target Practice and dummy rounds for this GWS.


Reason funds are required: Funds are required to procure Intermediate Caliber BA22 57MM 3P cartridges in place of legacy Intermediate CaliberAmmunition used during Operation Iraqi Freedom.


P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 026600 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION

SUBHEAD NO. A1ALTOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS



AL100

INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION COMPONENTSCART., 57MM, 3P MK295 BA22 11 2500.00 27

SUBTOTAL (PAGE 1 OF P5) 0 27 0 0DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED



PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION A1ALBLIN: 026600


AL100

INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION COMPONENTSCART., 57MM, 3P MK295 BA22

FY 2007 11 2500.00 NSWC CRANE Oct-06 CONTRACT UNKNOWN Apr-07 Oct-08 Jul-06

D. REMARKS




1 Navy Ammunition INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION A1ALFiscal Year 2006 Fiscal Year 2007 Fiscal Year 2008



FY 06 FY 06

AL100 BA22 - CART., 57MM, 3P MK295

UNKNOWN 07 K N 0.011 0.011 A 0.011

TOTALS 0.011 0.011 0.011




4000 12600 35280

Remarks:

Later


Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog

Qty


PrgYr

Oct 1


Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule


1 Navy Ammunition INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION A1ALFiscal Year 2009 Fiscal Year 2010 Fiscal Year 2011



FY 09 FY 09

AL100 BA22 - CART., 57MM, 3P MK295

UNKNOWN 07 K N 0.011 0.011 0.011

TOTALS 0.011 0.011 0.011




4000 12600 35280

Remarks:

Later


Date

Cost Code

Appropriation

U/M

Serv

Prog

Qty


PrgYr

Oct 1


Min Sust. 1-8-5 Max

ReachedD+

Production Schedule



PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITIONProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsSUBHEAD NO. A1AG BLIN: 027000





UNCLASSIFIED


The OSGA program consists of 40 medium caliber types of gun ammunition (20MM, 25MM, 30MM, 40MM, 60MM mortars). This supports active Navy ships, and active and reserve ashore warfareforces including mobile construction battalions (MCB), amphibious construction battalion (ACB), mobile security forces (MSF), fleet combat readiness groups, inshore undersea warfare groups andseveral other type operational units. Program includes support for emergent anti-terrorism/force protection and homeland defense requirements.


Reason funds are required: Funds are required to procure 25MM linked HEI-T/SAPHEI-T cartridges to provide the shipfill quantity for the new upgraded Mk 38 gun system. The upgraded Mk 38 gun system along with this linked HE ammunition configuration will enhance the Fleet's ability to defeat the small boat threat scenario. Funds are required to procure 20MM Enhanced Lethality Cartridges (ELC).


P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 027000 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION

SUBHEAD NO. A1AGTOTAL COST IN DOLLARS



AG100

25MM CARTRIDGES

CART.,25MM HEI-T/SAPHEI-T LI AA98 165,077 44.90 7,412,000

20MM CARTRIDGES

CART., 20MM ELC AA61 423,076 26.00 11,000,000

SUBTOTAL (PAGE 1 OF P5) 0 18,412,000 0 0DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED



PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION A1AGBLIN: 027000


AG100

25MM CARTRIDGES

CART.,25MM HEI-T/SAPHEI-T LINKED AA98FY 2007 165077 44.90 NSWC CRANE Oct-06 CONTRACT UNKNOWN Mar-07 May-08 YES

20MM CARTRIDGES

CART.,20MM ELC AA61FY 2007 423076 26.00 NSWC CRANE Oct-06 CONTRACT UNKNOWN Feb-07 Oct-08 Jul-06

D. REMARKS





PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 SMALL ARMS AND LANDING PARTY AMMUNITIONProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsSUBHEAD NO. 11AH BLIN: 033500





UNCLASSIFIED


This program provides ammunition in support of active Navy ships and for active and reserve ashore warfare forces including: mobile construction battalions (MCB), amphibious construction battalion (ACB),Naval Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), and several other type operational units.

PROCUREMENT: The funds are required to procure components, load and assemble complete rounds and conduct acceptance tests. FY 07 Supplemental funding will procure shotgun ammunition and .50caliber ammunition for traning and combat operations in support of OIF.


Reason funds are required: Navy watch standers as well as other Navy personnel cannot perform the required training for shotgun qualification and sustainment within the current budget. Current budget constraints only allow the procurement of the less effective .50 cal combat round A576 versus the more effective AA06 and the inventory could only be maintained at shipfill. The AA06 ammunition has 4 times the area of effectiveness as the A576 92,011K ve. 503K square yards. Based on the high .50 cal combat round inventory to full War Reserve. Supplemental funds will allow replenishment of the inventory to full War Reserve with the more effective AA06. The .50 caliber machine gun is an essential weapon for combating small boat threats and OIF air wing operations.


P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 033500 SMALL ARMS AND LANDING PARTY AMMUNITION

SUBHEAD NO. 11AHTOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS



AH100

SHOTGUN CARTRIDGESCTG, 12 GA, NO. 00 A011 684,160 0.38 262

.50 CAL CARTRIDGESCTG, .50 CAL,2 MK 211, 2 MK263, 1 M20 LK AA06 3,085,714 7.00 21,600

SUBTOTAL (PAGE 1 OF P5) 0 21,862 0 0DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:


UNCLASSIFIED



PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 SMALL ARMS AND LANDING PARTY AMMUNITION 11AHBLIN: 033500


AH100

SHOTGUN CARTRIDGESCTG, 12 GA, NO. 00 A011

FY 2007 684160 0.38 JMC ROCK ISLAND Oct-06 MIPR UNKNOWN Feb-07 Aug-07 YES

.50 CAL CARTRIDGESCTG, .50 CAL,2 MK 211,2 MK 263, 1 M20 LK AA06

FY 2007 3085714 7.00 JMC ROCK ISLAND Oct-06 MIPR UNKNOWN Mar-07 Feb-08 NO Nov-06

D. REMARKS





PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 PYROTECHNICS AND DEMOLITION MATERIALProgram Element for Code B Items: Other Related Program ElementsSUBHEAD NO. A1AJ BLIN: 034000





UNCLASSIFIED


This program provides pyrotechnics and demolition materials for all active naval vessels, amphibious and mobile construction battalions, mobile diving and salvage units, cargo handling and port groups,naval security groups, fleet composite operational readiness groups (formerly beachjumper unit (BJU's)) and explosive ordnance disposal groups/mobile units/detachments/teams. This program alsoprovides materials to support the ship shock test program.

Pyrotechnics are required to support the surface, air, ground, and underwater Navy requirements. These items consist of illumination, signalling, identification, and location devices using flare or smoke asthe primary signalling agent. Pyrotechnics are used for training, combat exercises, submarine rescue and personnel search and rescue operations. Demolitions consist of explosive devices and accessoriesand are required for fleet units to perform training functions and operations/requirements. Fleet requirements are based upon CNO approved allowance lists for special needs on a case by case basis andworldwide fleet expenditure.

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $9.2 $0.0 $.3 $9.5

Reason funds are required: Funds are required to procure 25MM linked HEI-T/SAPHEI-T cartridges to provide the shipfill quantity for the new upgraded Mk 38 gun system. The upgraded Mk 38 gun system along with this linked HE ammunition configuration will enhance the Fleet's ability to defeat the small boat threat scenario.


P-5 February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY ID Code P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE/SUBHEAD PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 034000 PYROTECHNICS AND DEMOLITION MATERIAL

SUBHEAD NO. A1AJTOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS



AJ100

NON-EL DET W/IN-LINE INITIATO MN52 416 81.61 34,000

NON-EL DET W/IN-LINE INITIATOR MN54 1,720 139.50 240,000

0 0TOTAL 0 274,000 0 0DD FORM 2446, JUN 86 P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:




PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS/BA 1 PYROTECHNICS AND DEMOLITION MATERIAL A1AJBLIN: 034000


AJ100 CONTINUED

NON-EL DET W/IN-LINE INITIATOR 100' DUAL MN52FY 2007 416 81.61 NSWC CRANE Oct-06 CONTRACT Unknown Mar-07 Apr-08 NO Nov-06

NON-EL DET W/IN-LINE INITIATOR 500' DUAL MN54FY 2007 1720 139.50 NSWC CRANE Oct-06 CONTRACT Unknown Mar-07 Apr-08 NO Nov-06

D. REMARKS



ID To Total

Code Complete Program

A 0.000 4.658 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.658

BLI

Exhibit P-40

Budget Item JustificationItem No. 17 Page 1 of 3101000

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (101000) 5.56MM, ALL TYPES

Appropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number: P-1 Item Nomenclature:

FEBRUARY 2007

Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010

12.116 16.437 4.658 33.211

Replenishes War Reserve Munitions stockpile.

FY 2012 FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


Description: The Cartridge, Ball M855 10/Clip (DODIC A059) is the primary ball ammunition for the M16A2 Rifle and can be used in the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) with a magazine.

Budget

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


ID Code:

A

Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit

Cost Qty Cost Cost Qty Cost Cost Qty Cost Cost Qty Cost

4.452 17,123,076 0.26

0.184 21,327 8.63

0.002

0.019

0.001

4.658

BLI

TOTAL

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING

QUALITY ASSURANCE

BOX METAL M2A1(EA)

ACCEPTANCE TESTING

Appropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition

A059, CTG, 5.56MM BALL

LOAD, ASSEMBLE & PACK (LAP)

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

Exhibit P-5, Cost Analysis Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System

Exhibit P-5Cost Analysis

P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:

(101000) 5.56MM, ALL TYPES

FY07

101000 Item No. 17 Page 2 of 3

Weapon System

RFP Contract Date of Tech Data Date

Unit Issue Method Award First Available Revisions

Qty Cost Location of PCO Date and Type Contractor and Location Date Delivery Now? Available

17,123,076 0.26 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 SS/FP ALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 APR 08 YES

21,327 8.63 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 SS/FP BROCKWAY STANDARD, ATLANTA, GA JUL 07 APR 08 YES

BLI Procurement History and PlanningExhibit P-5a


FY 2007

A059, CTG, 5.56MM BALL

Item No. 17 Page 3 of 3

BOX METAL M2A1(EA)

FY 2007

Exhibit P-5a, Procurement History and Planning


(101000) 5.56MM, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

101000

ID To Total


A 0.000 2.132 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.132

BLI

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (102000) 7.62MM, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007



Exhibit P-40


Description: The Cartridge, 7.62mm 4 Ball M80/1 Tracer M62 Linked (DODIC A131) is mainly used in the M240 Machine Guns against personnel and unarmored targets. The M62 Tracer round is intended to permit visible observation of the bullet’s in-flight path or trajectory to the point of impact.


Budget

7.384 10.675 2.132 20.191


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

ID Code:

A



1.991 3,263,934 0.61

0.021

0.105

0.015

2.132

BLI 102000 Item No. 18 Page 2 of 3Exhibit P-5

Cost Analysis


(102000) 7.62MM, ALL TYPES

FY07


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



A131, CTG, 7.62MM 4 & 1 LINKED


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

PRODUCT

INDUSTRIAL STOCK SUPPORT


QUALITY ASSURANCE

TOTAL

Weapon System




3,263,934 0.61 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 SS/FP ALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 APR 08 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

102000



(102000) 7.62MM, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

A131, CTG, 7.62MM 4 & 1 LINKED

Item No. 18 Page 3 of 3 Procurement History and PlanningExhibit P-5a


FY 2007

ID To Total


A 0.000 2.412 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.412

BLI


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Description: The MK7 MOD 2 mine clearing system, Anti-Personnel Obstacle Breaching System (APOBS) (DODIC MN79) consists of a line charge assembly and a fuze/rocket motor assembly. This item is a lightweight, self-contained, one-shot expendable system that is transported and deployed by a two-man team. APOBS uses the MK126 MOD1 rocket motor to propel a line charge over the obstacle. It is employed in combat operations to breach a lane through wire and anti-personnel mine obstacles.


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (103000) LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-40



FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

8.000 4.216 2.412 14.628

ID Code:

A



2.412 206 11709.89

2.412


Cost Analysis


(103000) LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES

FY07


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



MN79, APERS OBSTACLE BREACHING SYS


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

TOTAL

Weapon System




206 11709.89 MCSC, QUANTICO, VA AUG 99 C/FFP UNKNOWN AUG 07 FEB 08 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

103000



(103000) LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

MN79, APERS OBSTACLE BREACHING SYS



FY 2007

ID To Total


A 0.000 2.420 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.420

BLI

Exhibit P-40


FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (104000) .50 CALIBER


FEBRUARY 2007


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007



FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010

3.227 4.947 2.420 10.594

Replenishes War Reserve Munitions stockpile

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Description: The Cartridge, Caliber .50 4 API M8/1 API-T M20 Linked (DODIC A576) is used in M2 .50 caliber Machine Guns against armored targets. Upon impact with the target, the incendiary mixture bursts into flames and ignites the flammable material.

Budget

Gross Cost


ID Code:

A



2.188 828,787 2.64

0.079 9,166 8.65

0.015

0.015

0.104

0.019

2.420

BLI

TOTAL


QUALITY ASSURANCE

BOX METAL M2A1(EA)


INTERIM TRANSPORTATION



A576, CTG, CAL .50 4 & 1 LINKED


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



(104000) .50 CALIBER

FY07


Weapon System




828,787 2.64 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 SS/FP ALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 APR 08 YES

4,123 8.65 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 C/OP BEST FOAM FAB, CHICAGO, IL JUL 07 FEB 08 YES

5,043 8.65 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 C/OP BROCKWAY STANDARD, ATLANTA, GA JUL 07 FEB 08 YES



FY 2007

A576, CTG, CAL .50 4 & 1 LINKED


BOX METAL M2A1(EA)

FY 2007

FY 2007


P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:(104000) .50 CALIBER

Appropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number:Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition

Date:FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

104000

ID To Total


A 0.000 4.093 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.093

BLI


Gross CostThe Cartridge, 40mm High-Explosive Dual-Purpose (HEDP) M430/M430A1 Linked (DODIC B542) is a fixed cartridge of ammunition consisting of an ogive, projectile body, and cartridge case. This cartridge is fired from the MK19 Mod 3 Grenade Machine Gun and is a high explosive, dual-purpose cartridge. The projectile’s shaped charge is designed to penetrate two inches of steel armor and inflict personnel casualties in the target area.

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (105000) 40MM, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-40Budget Item JustificationItem No. 21 Page 1 of 3105000

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

39.208 9.227 4.093 52.528


ID Code:

A



B542, CTG, 40MM HEDP LINKED FOR MK19

CTG, 40MM, HEDP, M430A1 4.093 108,567 37.70

4.093


Cost Analysis


(105000) 40MM, ALL TYPES

FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

TOTAL

Weapon System




56,454 37.70 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 06 C/OP AMTECH CORP JANESVILLE, WI JUL 07 NOV 08 YES

52,113 37.70 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 06 C/OP DSE, INC (BALIMOY) TAMPA, FLA JUL 07 APR 09 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

105000






Date:

FEBRUARY 2007


FY 2007

FY 2007

B542, CTG, 40MM HEDP LINKED FOR

CTG, 40MM, HEDP, M430A1

Procurement History and PlanningExhibit P-5a

ID To Total


A 0.000 9.864 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 9.864

BLI

FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Exhibit P-40

The Cartridge, 60mm Smoke White Phosphorus (WP) M722 (DODIC B646) is a white phosphorus cartridge for use in the 60mm M224 Lightweight Company Mortar System. It is intended for use for spotting purposes.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

Gross Cost

Proc Qty


Date:



FEBRUARY 2007



FY 2011FY 2009FY 2007 FY 2008FY 2006



Budget

2.935 9.876 9.864 22.675

ID Code:

A



3.038 17,416 174.38

0.329 18,113 18.15

2.390 18,113 131.97

0.273 18,113 15.05

0.876 72,452 12.09

0.710

1.775

0.473

9.864

BLI

TOTAL

ACCEPTANCE TESTING


QUALITY ASSURANCE

IGNITION CTG, 60MM, M702

PROPELLENT CHARGE, 60MM, M235

B646, CTG, 60MM SMOKE WP

LAP, CTG, 60MM, M722A1

BODY TUBE AND TAIL CONE

FUZE, PD, M783



HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System




FY07 FY08


Weapon System




17,416 174.38 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/FP PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF, AR JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

18,113 18.15 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP LEWIS ENGINEERING, MARSHALL, TX JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

18,113 131.97 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP KDI PRECISION, CINCINATTI, OH JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

18,113 15.05 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP AMERICAN ORDNANCE, MILAN, TN JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

72,452 12.09 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP POCAL INDUSTRIES, MOSCOW, PA JUL 07 JAN 09 YES


FY 2007


BODY TUBE AND TAIL CONE

108300

B646, CTG, 60MM SMOKE WP


FY 2007






Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

IGNITION CTG, 60MM, M702

FY 2007

PROPELLENT CHARGE, 60MM, M235

FY 2007

FUZE, PD, M783

FY 2007

Calendar Year Calendar YearS Q D B O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S B

F V T E A C O E A E A P A U U U E C O E A E A P A U U U E A

Y C Y L L T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P L

2007 MC1 17.4 0 17.4 A 17.4

S Q D B O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S B



2007 MC1 17.4 0 17.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.9

BLI Production Schedule

Item

B646


B646

(108300) DODIC: B646, CTG, 60MM SMOKE WPPRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES

Date:FEBRUARY 2007

P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:Appropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number:


Exhibit P-21

2009

2006

WeaponSystemProcurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition

Item

Manufacturer's Name

and Location MSR ECON MAX

ALT Prior to

Oct 1

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLT

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

Unit of

Measure

B646 2 10 91 PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF, AR 5 6 18 18 27 K

Item

Fiscal Year2008

2007

REMARKS:

2008 2009


Fiscal Year

Calendar Year Calendar Year




2007 MC1 17.4 13.5 3.9 1.5 1.5 0.9 0





Item

B646


B646

(108300) DODIC: B646, CTG, 60MM SMOKE WPPRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES

Date:FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-21, Production Schedule, Continued

Exhibit P-21

2013

2010


Item

Manufacturer's Name


ALT Prior to

Oct 1

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLT

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

Unit of

Measure

B646 2 10 91 PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF, AR 5 6 18 18 27 K

Item

Fiscal Year2012

2011

REMARKS:

2012 2013


Fiscal Year


ID To Total


A 0.000 10.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.088

BLI

Description: The Cartridge, 81mm High Explosive (HE) M821/M821A1 (DODIC C868) with Multi-Option Fuze M734 is a high explosive round developed for use in the M252 Improved 81mm Mortar System. It is intended for use against personnel and light materiel targets.

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:



FEBRUARY 2007




Exhibit P-40

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

57.120 17.474 10.088 84.682

ID Code:

A



1.409 14,459 97.43

0.490 15,037 32.56

3.090 15,037 205.50

0.642 15,037 42.74

0.497 60,152 8.27

0.933 15,037 62.06

0.727

1.816

0.484

10.088


Cost Analysis



FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



C868, CTG, 81MM HE WITH MOF


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

FIN ASSEMBLY

FUZE, MO, M734A1

IGNITION CARTRIDGE M752

PROPELLENT CHARGE

SHELL BODY, 81MM, M821A2

ACCEPTANCE TESTING


QUALITY ASSURANCE

TOTAL

Weapon System




14,459 97.43 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP UNKNOWN JUL 07 JUL 08 YES

15,037 32.56 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP WILKINSON MFG, PORT CALHOUN, NE JUL 07 JUL 08 YES

15,037 205.50 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP KDI PRECISION, CINCINATTI, OH JUL 07 JUL 08 YES


60,152 8.27 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 07 SS/OP GENERAL DYNAMICS, MARION, IL JUL 07 JUL 08 YES


BLI 109100

WBS COST ELEMENTS

C868, CTG, 81MM HE WITH MOF

FY 2007

SHELL BODY, 81MM, M821A2

PROPELLENT CHARGE

FY 2007






Date:

FEBRUARY 2007


FY 2007

FY 2007

FY 2007

FIN ASSEMBLY



FUZE, MO, M734A1

IGNITION CARTRIDGE M752

FY 2007




2007 MC1 14.5 0 14.5 A 14.5




2007 MC1 14.5 0 14.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 0

BLI

REMARKS: THIS DOES NOT REFLECT THE ARMY'S BUYS WHICH MAKE UP THE CONTRACTOR'S 1-8-5 PRODUCTION RATES.

2008 2009


Fiscal Year


Item

Fiscal Year2008

2007

K21121263,0001 UNKNOWN

Unit of

Measure

C868 10.00 8,000 9

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLTECON MAX

ALT Prior to

Oct 1Item

Manufacturer's Name

and Location MSR


Exhibit P-21

2009

2006

Date:FEBRUARY 2007



(109100) DODIC: C868, CTG, 81MM HE WITH MOFPRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES


C868

Production Schedule

Item

C868

ID To Total


A 0.000 7.779 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.779

BLI

Description: The XM1002 Target Practice Multi-Purpose Cartridge with Tracer (TPMP-T) DODIC CA31, 120mm Cartridge is a Training Cartridge for the tactical M830A1 HEAT-MP-T Cartridge.

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


32.726 11.034 7.779 51.539

Budget


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006



FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:



FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-40


ID Code:

A



7.416 5,368 1381.59

0.038

0.325

7.779


Cost Analysis



FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

ACCEPTANCE TESTING


CA31, CTG, 120MM TPMP-T M1002

COMPLETE ROUND

PRODUCT

TOTAL

Weapon System




2,684 1381.59 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FFP ALLIANT TECH SYS INC, PLYMOUTH, MN JUL 07 APR 08 YES

2,684 1381.59 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FFP GENERAL DYNAMICS, ST. PETERSBURG, FL JUL 07 APR 08 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

112100


P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:(112100) 120MM, ALL TYPES


Date:FEBRUARY 2007


FY 2007

CA31, CTG, 120MM TPMP-T M1002

COMPLETE ROUND


FY 2007




2007 MC2 2.68 0 2.68 A 2.68

2007 MC1 2.68 0 2.68 A 2.68




2007 MC2 2.68 0 2.68 2.68 0

2007 MC1 2.68 0 2.68 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.28 0

BLI

REMARKS:

2008 2009


Fiscal Year


Item

Fiscal Year2008

2007

K

K

18

18

9

9

9

9

4

4

250

250

1 GENERAL DYNAMICS, ST. PETERSBURG, FL

2 ALLIANT TECH SYS INC, PLYMOUTH, MN

Unit of

Measure

CA31 100

100

400

400

9

9

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLTECON MAX

ALT Prior to

Oct 1Item

Manufacturer's Name

and Location MSR


Exhibit P-21

2009

2006

Date:FEBRUARY 2007P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:Appropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number:


(112100) DODIC: CA31, CTG, 120MM TPMP-T M1002PRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES


CA31

Production Schedule

Item

CA31

ID To Total


A 0.000 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.080

BLI


Description: The Cartridge, 25mm High-Explosive Incendiary with Tracer (HEI-T) M792 Linked (DODIC A975) is a high-explosive incendiary round equipped with a tracer. It is a fixed-type, percussion-primed ammunition fired from the M242 Automatic Cannon. It is used as a high-explosive service round for engaging unarmored ground targets.


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Other Related Program Elements

FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Program Element for Code B Items:

Date:



FEBRUARY 2007



Budget

9.498 1.322 0.080 10.900

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

Exhibit P-40


ID Code:

A



0.080 1,673 47.80

0.080


Cost Analysis



FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



A975, CTG, 25MM HEI-T LINKED

CTG,25MM, HEI-T, M792

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

TOTAL

Weapon System




1,673 47.80 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JUL 06 C/FPALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 JUL 08 YES

BLI 138800

WBS COST ELEMENTS

A975, CTG, 25MM HEI-T LINKED






Date:

FEBRUARY 2007


CTG,25MM, HEI-T, M792

FY 2007

ID To Total


A 0.000 0.155 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.155

BLI

FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006



FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012

Date:



FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-40


4.180 0.471 0.155 4.806

Description: The Cartridge, 9mm Ball M882 (DODIC A363) is intended for use against enemy personnel and for security purposes. This cartridge may be used in the M9 Service Pistol and the MP5N Submachine Gun.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

ID Code:

A



0.129 1,290,000 0.10

0.014 1,515 9.24

0.002

0.009

0.001

0.155


Cost Analysis



FY07


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



A363, CTG, 9MM BALL


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

QUALITY ASSURANCE

BOX METAL M2A1(EA)



TOTAL

Weapon System




1,290,000 0.10 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL OCT 04 SS/FP ALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 MAR 08 YES

1,515 9.24 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JAN 04 C/OP BEST FOAM FAB, CHICAGO, IL JUL 07 JAN 08 YES

BLI 142800

WBS COST ELEMENTS






Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

A363, CTG, 9MM BALL


BOX METAL M2A1(EA)

FY 2007



FY 2007

ID To Total


A 0.000 1.138 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.138

BLI

Description: The Fuze, Hand Grenade Practice M228 (DODIC G878) is a pyrotechnic delay-igniting fuze. The fuze is used with the Grenade, Hand Practice M69 (DODIC G811). The fuze contains a primer and a pyrotechnic delay column. Assembled to the fuze is a striker, striker spring, safety lever, safety pin with pull ring, safety clip, and igniter assembly.


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (146800) GRENADES, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007



Budget


Exhibit P-40

8.349 13.145 1.138 22.632

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


ID Code:

A



1.088 275,443 3.95

0.050

1.138

BLI

G878, FUZE, HAND GRENADE PRACTICE M228*

146800 Item No. 27 Page 2 of 3Exhibit P-5

Cost Analysis


(146800) GRENADES, ALL TYPES

FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

COMPLETE ROUND


TOTAL

Weapon System




G878, FUZE, HAND GREN PRACT

275,443 3.95 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL JUN 07 C/FFP

MARTIN ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES, PERRY, FL JUL 07 SEP 09 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

COMPLETE ROUND

FY 2007


P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:(146800) GRENADES, ALL TYPES


Date:FEBRUARY 2007



ID To TotalCode Complete Program

A 0.000 5.125 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.125

BLI


Baseline Title IX Supplemental Total Budget 13.048 7.062 5.125 25.235


Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (147100) ROCKETS, ALL TYPESAppropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number: P-1 Item Nomenclature:

FEBRUARY 2007Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Description: The Cartridge and Launcher, 84mm M136 AT-4 (DODIC C995) is mainly employed against armored personnel carriers. However, it can be used against battle tanks when fired at the flanks or rear. It can also be employed as an assault weapon against bunkers, field fortifications, and other hard-point positions. Issued as one round of ammunition, the AT-4 tactical round is a self-contained, lightweight, disposable weapon.

(Dollars in Millions)FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007

ID Code:

A



4.741 2,050 2312.57

0.384

5.125

BLI

TOTAL




C995, ROCKET, 84MM HEAA (AT-4)

AT-4 MULTI PURPOSE WEAPON

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System


(147100) ROCKETS, ALL TYPES

FY07

Exhibit P-5

Cost Analysis147100 Item No. 28 Page 2 of 3

Weapon System




2,050 2312.57 MCSC, QUANTICO, VA SEP 07 SS/FFP SAAB BOFORS DYNAMICS, SWEDEN AUG 07 OCT 08 YES


AT-4 MULTI PURPOSE WEAPON

FY 2007

C995, ROCKET, 84MM HEAA (AT-4)




(147100) ROCKETS, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

147100

ID To Total


A 0.000 13.045 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 13.045

BLI


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (147300) ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007


Exhibit P-40


Description: The Projectile, 155mm Illuminating M485A2 (DODIC D505) is a separate loading artillery projectile that consists of a hollow steel shell with an illuminant canister, a canister expelling charge in the projectile nose, and a drogue parachute in the base, this projectile is fired from the 155mm M198 and M777 Towed Howitzers. The projectile uses a Mechanical Time fuze.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

35.371 11.956 13.045 60.372

ID Code:

A



8.322 8,764 949.60

0.080 9,028 8.86

0.019 9,028 2.12

4.016 8,939 449.24

0.189

0.493

0.006

NONRECURRING

-0.080

13.045


Cost Analysis


(147300) ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES

FY07 FY08


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



D505, PROJ, 155MM, M485A2, ILLUM


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

ACCEPTANCE TESTING


*UNIVERSAL LIFTING PLUG(EA)

GROMMET(EA)

PROJ MPTS(EA)

QUALITY ASSURANCE

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIAL

TOTAL

Weapon System




8,764 949.60 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FP PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF,AR JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

9,028 8.86 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN N/A STOCK ISSUE JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

9,028 2.12 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN SS/FP LC INDUSTRIES HAZELHURST JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

8,939 449.24 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FP UNKNOWN JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

147300



(147300) ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

D505, PROJ, 155MM, M485A2, ILLUM

*UNIVERSAL LIFTING PLUG(EA)

FY 2007

GROMMET(EA)


FY 2007


PROJ MPTS(EA)

FY 2007

FY 2007





2007 MC1 8.76 0 8.76 A 8.76




2007 MC1 8.76 0 8.76 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 2.19

BLI

REMARKS:

2008 2009


Fiscal Year


Item

Fiscal Year2008

2007

K271818641 PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF, AR

Unit of

Measure

D505 2 10 9

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLTECON MAX

ALT Prior to

Oct 1Item

Manufacturer's Name

and Location MSR


Exhibit P-21

2009

2006

Date:FEBRUARY 2007



(147300) DODIC: D505, PROJ, 155MM, M485A2, ILLUMPRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES


D505

Production Schedule

Item

D505




2007 MC1 8.76 6.57 2.19 0.73 0.73 0.73 0





Item


D505

(147300) DODIC: D505, PROJ, 155MM, M485A2, ILLUMPRODUCTION RATE PROCUREMENT LEADTIMES

Date:FEBRUARY 2007



Exhibit P-21

2013

2010


Item

Manufacturer's Name


ALT Prior to

Oct 1

ALT After

Oct 1

Initial Mfg

PLT

Reorder Mfg

PLT Total

Unit of

Measure

D505 2 10 91 PINE BLUFF ARSENAL, PINE BLUFF, AR 4 6 18 18 27 K

Item

Fiscal Year2012

2011

REMARKS:

2012 2013


Fiscal Year


ID To TotalCode Complete Program

A 0.000 0.705 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.705

BLI


Budget

8.249 7.668 0.705 16.622

Description: The Charge, Demolition Cratering 40-Pound (DODIC M039) is an alternate to the standard ammonium nitrate cratering charge for the destruction of buildings, structures, and fortifications. The charge is composed of approximately 40-pound of H-6 explosive and a .43-pound A-5 composition booster. H-6 explosive is a highly brisant explosive derived from the HBX family. A semicircular handle is also located on the top of the container for handling the charge or for attaching a line when lowering the charge in a hole.

(Dollars in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 Baseline Title IX Supplemental Total


Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (150000) DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPESAppropriation Code/Budget Activity/Serial Number: P-1 Item Nomenclature:

FEBRUARY 2007Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

ID Code:

A



0.529 2,117 250.10

0.034 4,234 8.22

0.008 1,604 5.46

0.163 61,393 2.67

0.021 16,930 1.26

0.061 25,404 2.39

0.066

0.028

-0.205

0.705

BLI

TOTAL

NONRECURRING


PRODUCT


QUALITY ASSURANCE

TNT TYPE 1 FLAKE (LB)

* COMP D-2 (LB)

*COMP A-5 CLASS 1 (LB)

*COMP B TYPE 1 GRADE A (LB)

ALUMINUM POWDER (LB)



M039, CHG, DEMO 40 LB CRATERING

LOAD, ASSIEMBLE & PACK

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



(150000) DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES

FY07 FY08


Weapon System




2,117 250.10 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FFP AMERICAN ORDNANCE, MIDDLETON, IA AUG 07 AUG 08 YES

4,234 8.22 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN N/A STOCK ISSUE AUG 07 AUG 08 NO

1,604 5.46 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FFP UNKNOWN AUG 07 AUG 08 NO






FY 2007

*COMP A-5 CLASS 1(LB)

FY 2007

ALUMINUM POWDER (LB)

FY 2007

M039, CHG, DEMO 40LB CRATERING


*COMP D-2 (LB)

FY 2007

*COMP B TYPE I GRADE A (LB)

FY 2007

TNT TYPE I FLAKE (LB)

FY 2007


P-1 Line Item Nomenclature:(150000) DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES


Date:FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

150000

ID To Total


A 0.000 0.661 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.661

BLI

Exhibit P-40


Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (162500) FUZES, ALL TYPES


FEBRUARY 2007



FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Description: The Fuze, Point Detonating (PD) M739/M739A1 (DODIC N340) is the latest improved version of the selective impact fuzes for use with bulk loaded high explosive or burster type projectiles. This fuze is fired from the M198 155mmMedium Towed Howitzer and the M777 Lightweight Towed Howitzer Weapon System. The fuze body is a one-piece design of solid aluminum and has a standard 2-inch threaded base to match the nose and fuze cavity of standard artillery projectiles.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007



Budget

0.563 1.136 0.661 2.360

ID Code:

A



N340 , FUZE, PD M739

COMPLETE ROUND 0.567 18,885 30.03

*M2A1 AMMO CAN 0.028 2,359 11.95

PRODUCT

ACCEPTANCE TESTING 0.028

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING 0.066

-0.028

0.661

BLI

TOTAL


NONRECURRING



HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



(162500) FUZES, ALL TYPES

FY07 FY08


Weapon System




N340, FUZE, PD M739

COMPLETE ROUND

18,885 30.03 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FP UNKNOWN JUL 07 JAN 09 YES

M2A1 AMMO CAN

2,359 11.95 JMC, ROCK ISLAND, IL UNKNOWN C/FFP STOCK ISSUE JUL 07 JAN 09 NO

BLI

FY 2007

FY 2007





(162500) FUZES, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

WBS COST ELEMENTS

162500

ID To Total


A 0.000 4.891 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.891

BLI

FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Budget

Gross CostDescription: The Charge, Diversionary, Bottom Top Venting, BTV-1, (DODIC GG20) is a pyrotechnic device (grenade) used for diversionary purposes. The diversionary charge is a low hazard, nonshrapnel producing explosive device that produces intense flash and sound report. This replaces the Charge, Diversionary MK141 Mod 0 (DODIC DWBS) due to safety and reliability concerns.

The Venom Smoke and Flash Bang Non-Lethal Grenades (Temporary DODIC VNOM) are fired from a vehicle mounted platform at targets up to 200 meters distance. The primary use of Venom munitions is a standoff visible/audible warning system at vehicle checkpoints.


FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (162800) NON-LETHALS


FEBRUARY 2007



4.014 1.137 4.891 10.042

Exhibit P-40


ID To

Code Complete Total

A 0.241

3,299

0.241

BLI

FEBRUARY 2007

Date:Exhibit P-40a, Budget Item Justification for Aggregated Items


Exhibit P-40a


Total

162800


(162800) NON-LETHALS

GG20, GRENADE. HAND STUD, BTV-1 EL

FY2008 FY2009



FY2006 FY2007

QTY

ID Code:

A



4.650 93,000 50.00

4.650


Cost Analysis


(162800) NON LETHALS, ALL TYPES

FY07


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



VNOM, GRENADE, TUBE LAUNCHED, SMOKE/FLASH


HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

TOTAL

Weapon System




VNOM, GRENADE, TUBE LAUNCHED, SMOKE/FLASH

93,000 50.00 MCSC QUANTICO, VA OCT 04 SS/FP COMBINED SYSTEMS, INC, JAMESTOWN, PA JUL 07 APR 08 YES

Exhibit P-5aBLI 162800 Procurement History and PlanningItem No. 33 Page 4 of 4


WBS COST ELEMENTS

FY 2007



(162800) NON LETHALS, ALL TYPES



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

ID To Total


A 0.000 15.394 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 15.394

BLI Budget Item JustificationItem No. 34 Page 1 of 2163000

Exhibit P-40

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (163000) AMMO MODERNIZATION


FEBRUARY 2007



FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006

Description: Ammunition modernization (Ammo Mod) consists of the procurement of components, end item modernization, repacking of modernized material and upgrading ammunition stocks suspended from use, and/or declared unsafe or unserviceable.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007



Budget

7.701 0.000 15.394 23.095

ID Code:

A



15.394 0 0.000

15.394

BLI

TOTAL



AMMO, AMMO MOD

AMMUNITION MODERNIZATION

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



(163000) AMMO MODERNIZATION

FY07


ID To Total


A 0.000 0.099 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.099

BLI

Budget

0.000 0.097 0.099 0.196

Description: The Cartridge, 12 Gauge #00 Buckshot M162 (DODIC AA60) is used for training, combat, and guard purposes with the M500, M590, and M870 12-gauge Auto-loading and Pump action Shotguns.


FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2007


Gross Cost

FY 2007 FY 2008

Proc Qty

FY 2006


FY 2011FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013

Date:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps/2/Ammunition (166000) ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION


FEBRUARY 2007



Exhibit P-40


ID Code:

A



0.099 152,307 0.65

0.099


Cost Analysis


(166000) ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION

FY07


FEBRUARY 2007

Weapon System



AA60, CTG 3 INCH 00 BUCKSHOT

COMPLETE ROUND

HARDWARE

WBS COST ELEMENTS

TOTAL

Weapon System




152,307 0.65 NSWC, CRANE, IN JAN 04 SS/FP ALLIANT TECH, INDEPENDENCE, MO JUL 07 JAN 08 YES

BLI

WBS COST ELEMENTS

166000



(166000) ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION



Date:

FEBRUARY 2007

AA60, CTG 3 INCH 00 BUCKSHOT


COMPLETE ROUND

FY 2007


Research and Development

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) NAME AND NO.RDT&E, N /BA-4 Demonstration and Validation 0603635M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support System

FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

36.844

36.844

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

Note:

B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARYFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 0.503 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases 12.450 (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 36.844 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.049 (U) FY 2007 Supplemental Budget: 49.748

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See Above. (U) Schedule: (U) Technical: Not Applicable.

UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2007

COST ($ in Millions)FY 2007

Supplemental

Total PE Cost

C3132 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV)

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing and manufacturing development for upgrades of existing systems.

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

This PE provides modification to Marine Corps Expeditionary Ground Force Weapon Systems to increase lethality, range, survivability and operational effectiveness. It also provides for the development of AAV7A1 reliability, maintainability, operational and safety modifications, improvements in command and control in the ADMS, and product improvements to the family of LAVs. The AVTB provides facilities and personnel which perform a broad range of testing, repair and technical services to amphibious vehicles.

R-1 Line Item No. 581 of 4

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:February 2006

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-04 Demonstration and Validation 0603635M - Marine Corps Grnd Cmbt/Supt Sys C3132 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

FY 2007FY 2006 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013

0.000 36.844 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 RDT&E Articles Qty(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty


(U) Total $(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007

(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 0.000

(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases 36.844 (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments

(U) FY 2008 Budget: 36.844

29.475 0.000

System Design/Developmental TestFY 2007 Supplemental

7.369

0.000

FY 2008

0.0000.000

UNCLASSIFIED

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) is a program for a family of vehicles to replace and/or supplement the current High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) family of vehicles. The JLTV will be designed to address the problems currently being experienced with the HMMWV family. It will possess significantly improved survivability, better power management, increased operational range, and logistics performance/supportability over the HMMWV, as well as the capacity to carry and haul more weight with high reliability, both of which are significant problems for the HMMWV, particularly with the burden of add-on armor. Reason funds are required: Funding is required to accelerate the JLTV program development.

Impact if funds are not provided: The JLTV program replacement of HMMWVs will not be accelerated. The greater protection, performance and increased payload capacity that the JLTV will provide will not be available sooner than currently planned.

FY 2006

FY 2008 FY 2009

FY 2009

0.00036.844

COST ($ in Millions)

Project Cost

FY 20060.000

(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:


0.000 0.000

System Engineering

0.000

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 58

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2a, 2 of 4)


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-04 Demonstration and Validation 0603635M - Marine Corps Grnd Cmbt/Supt Sys C3132 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Schedule: Initiate JLTV as Program of Record (U) Technical: Initiate JLTV as Program of Record

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total CostPMC BLI 509500 JLTV 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 42.400 92.900 136.450 105.680 Cont Cont

(U) Related RDT&E:RDT&E C2930 Pre Phase A Activities 0.822 3.804 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.626

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

(U) Funding: See Above.

Anticipate that this program will be pursued under an Evolutionary Acquisition, Incremental Development acquisition strategy. The USMC program office, as part of the JLTV Program Office (JPO), will work with the Army to conduct concept and technology refinement activities to reduce overall program risk and transition technologies for integration into the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV). The JPO will conduct analyses, trade studies, concept designs, modeling and simulation, and develop component/system mockups for the JLTV family of vehicles. The JPO will also work with Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Army’s Research Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM) Future Tactical Truck System, Advance Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) for future JLTV technologies that could be incorporated into the JLTV at Increment 1 or as a preplanned product improvement under follow-on increments. After Milestone B, the Program Office will release an Request for Proposal (RFP) for full and open competition award of System Development and Demonstration (SDD) contract(s). Up to 2 contracts may be awarded based on affordability. The competing vendors will develop prototype vehicles for Government Developmental Testing

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:TBD

Prior to Milestone C, the program will down select to (1) contractor. This contractor will then go into operational testing and Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). MS C/LRIP Decision will be in FY 10; Full Rate Production Decision will be in FY11; Initial Operational Capability is planned for FY12.


UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2a, 3 of 4)

DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February-07APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-04 Demonstration and Validation 0603635M - Marine Corps Grnd Cmbt/Supt SysCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value of& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Compl Cost Contract

System Design/DT TBD TBD, MCSC, Quantico 0.000 0.000 29.475 Jul-07 Cont Cont TBDSystem Engineering TBD TBD, MCSC, Quantico 0.000 0.000 5.269 Jul-07 Cont Cont TBDLogistics Development TBD TBD, MCSC, Quantico 0.000 0.000 2.100 Jul-07 Cont Cont TBD

Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 36.844 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value of& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Compl Cost Contract

Cont ContCont Cont

Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Cont ContCont Cont

Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:

Total Cost 0.000 0.000 36.844 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

UNCLASSIFIED

C3132 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle


UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-3, page 4 of 4)

UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURERDT&E, NAVY / BA-5COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013Total PE Cost 3.8001425 V-22 3.800

February 2007

0604262N, V-22A

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:The FY07 supplemental funding requested is for the development of software needed to upgrade the AN/AAQ-27 Forward Looking Infrared Radar (FLIR) for installation into the Block B aircraft. This developmental upgrade will provide enhanced image quality, Cross Hair in the center of the display at all times, Heading Tape on the FLIR display, Vector Arrow on the FLIR display, and Aircraft altitude on the FLIR display during night operations or other degraded visibility missions. The aircrew of the MV-22 will rely heavily on the FLIR to provide both tactical and safety of flight information. Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare demands continuous situational awareness and the ability to respond rapidly and opportunistically to changing situations. This is particularly important given the number of missions flown under the cover of darkness where added safety margin gains adds to success.

UNCLASSIFIEDR-1 Shopping List Item No 95

Page 1 of 3 Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA - 5 0604262N, V-22A 1425, V-22


3.800 RDT&E Articles Qty(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:


COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty(U) Total $


0.000FY 2007 Supplemental


The supplemental funding will be placed on contract with Bell-Boeing for design and development of the AN/AAQ-27 Forward Looking Infrared Radar (FLIR) software upgrade.

3.800

UNCLASSIFIED

Amount requested for FY2007 Supplemental: $3.8M. The FY07 supplemental funding requested is for the development of software needed to upgrade the AN/AAQ-27 Forward Looking Infrared Radar (FLIR) for installation into the Block B aircraft. This developmental upgrade will provide enhanced image quality, Cross Hair in the center of the display at all times, Heading Tape on the FLIR display, Vector Arrow on the FLIR display, and Aircraft altitude on the FLIR display during night operations or other degraded visibility missions. The aircrew of the MV-22will rely heavily on the FLIR to provide both tactical and safety of flight information. Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare demands continuous situational awareness and the ability to respond rapidly and opportunistically to changing situations. This is particularly important given the number of missions flown under the cover of darkness where added safety margin gains adds to success.

3.800


Project Cost

UNCLASSIFIEDR-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 95

Page 2 of 3

Exhibit R-2a, RDTE,N Project Justification


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA - 5 0604262N, V-22A 1425, V-22

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007

(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 267.448 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Title IX Appropriations (U) FY07 Supplemental 3.800

(U) FY 2007 Total Budget 271.248 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable (U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable

Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost

(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: Not Applicable.

D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:The MV-22 is currently in EMD under contract N00019-93-C-0006 awarded to Bell-Boeing on 22 Oct 92, and definitized in May 94. As a result ofmishaps during and subsequent to MV-22 OPEVAL (Apr and Dec 00), the program was restructured employing a phased approach to return to flight andtactical introduction. The Contractor and Government defined deficient areas within the program/aircraft requiring correction prior to return toflight. A Block Upgrade approach has been planned, with required efforts being identified in Block "A", "B", and "C". Block "A" includes thoseefforts necessary to return the V-22 to safe and operational fleet operations. Block "B" includes those efforts necessary to improve theeffectiveness and suitability of the aircraft. Block "C" includes mission enhancements like weather radar and cabin effectiveness suitabilityimprovements. Non-recurring development activities are to be initiated and completed for all efforts identified to be in Block "A", "B", and"C". The Contractor will develop specific Statements of Work and Preliminary Specification Change Notices required to integrate the BlockUpgrade efforts into the baseline EMD Program. A Systems Requirements Review, Initial Design Review, and Final Design Review will be held foreach of the Block efforts so the design maturity can be reviewed and the Government can redirect activities as appropriate. The CV-22 EMDprogram is structured in Blocks to define an evolutionary approach to achieving full operational capability. Block "0" is the initial baselineCV-22 variant. Block "10" enhances mission capability with the addition of Directional Infrared Countermeasures. Additional Blocks are inplanning to continue the growth process throughout the operational life of the weapon system.


UNCLASSIFIEDR-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 95

Page 3 of 3

Exhibit R-2a, RDTE,N Project Justification

UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURERESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-5COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TotalTotal PE Cost 1.245 1.2450556 EW COUNTER RESPONSE 1.245 1.245

February 2007

0604270N, EW DEVELOPMENT

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:This element includes development of electronic warfare systems for the United States Navy (USN), United States Marine Corps (USMC), and UnitedStates Army (USA) tactical aircraft, USMC helicopters, surface combatants, data link vulnerability assessments, precision targeting, USN and USMCcommunications and non-communications jammers, and development and testing of electronic warfare devices for emerging threats and emergencycontingencies in support of the Global War on Terror (GWOT).


Page 1 of 3 Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-5 0604270N, EW DEVELOPMENT 0556, EW COUNTER RESPONSE

0.600 RDT&E Articles Qty(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:Amount requested for FY2007 Supplemental : $0.600 JATO:



1.245


UNCLASSIFIED


Project Cost

0.645

(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:FY 2007 Supplemental

1.245

Amount requested for FY2007 Supplemental: $ 0.645 :

received in the FY06 supplemental, however, current budget does not support the ongoing and continuous detailed threat analysis

OIF & OEF nor the countries adjacent to OIF & OEF in support of Stoplight and Jumpstart (classified descriptions) programs in F

request represents an expanded research effort to develop new updates to the EW intelligence database used to load mission libr

Continue software development and test support required to address and counter new threat development for both the ICAP II and ICAP III EAconfigurations. JATO will continue to optimize and generate tactics and techniques as the full potential of the ALQ-218's selective reactivejamming capabilities are being developed and employed. JATO will optimize the fusion and correlation of the ALQ-218 tracks with other nationalasset contacts. JATO also continues to lead our efforts in Force Protection/GWOT (classified discussion upon request) and Next GenerationJammer. If not funded, JATO will not be able to keep the pace in its support with the ever increasing and evolving threat to protect the warfighter and strike aircraft.

User Data Files provide updated intelligence data and jammer techniques to aircrew in current operational theatres. Funding in the amount of $300K was received in the FY06 supplemental, however, current budget does not support the ongoing and continuous detailed threat analysis required to support OIF & OEF nor the countries adjacent to OIF & OEF in support of Stoplight and Jumpstart (classified descriptions) programs in FY07. This funding request represents an expanded research effort to develop new updates to the EW intelligence database used to load mission libraries in the EA-6B aircraft mission computer. If not funded, it will reduce the support to ground forces, and the JATO Jumpstart/Stoplight mission that directly supports the ground forces and will become obsolete and ineffective.

capabilities are being developed and employed. JATO will optimize the fusion and correlation of the ALQ-218 tracks with other nationalasset contacts. JATO also continues to lead our efforts in Force Protection/GWOT (classified discussion upon request) and Next GenerationJammer. If not funded, JATO will not be able to keep the pace in its support with the ever increasing and evolving threat to protect the warfighter and strike aircraft.


Page 2 of 3 Exhibit R-2a RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-5 0604270N, EW DEVELOPMENT 0556, EW COUNTER RESPONSE

UNCLASSIFIED


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 33.018 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Title IX Appropriations (U) FY07 Supplemental 1.245


(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: FY 2007 Supplemental

Line Item No. & Name To Compl Total CostP-1 # 25, EA-6 Series 178.500 178.500

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: Not Applicable


(U) Funding: See Above.(U) Schedule: None(U) Technical: None

JATO work will be performed by the Naval Research Lab, NAWC WD, and John Hopkins University. UDF work will be performedby NAWC WD. Force Protection work will be performed by NAWC AD and John Hopkins University.


Page 3 of 3 Exhibit R-2a RDTEN Budget Item Justification

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:February-07

PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support 0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support C2930 Phase A Activities

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006FY 2007

Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY20130.000 10.142 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

RDT&E Articles Qty(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:




FY 20090.000 0.400 0.000 0.000

These activities do not overlap/conflict with Mission Area Analysis and Analysis of Alternatives funded within the MCCDC Studies and Analysis (S&A) program, MCSC Phase A Activities, Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) warfighting experimentation or Science and Technology (S&T) activities. Pre-phase A Activities allow high priority requirements to move ahead in advance of funding decisions for specific programs, provide a better capability to react to emerging requirements and improve the quality of initiatives brought to the POM process. Through front-end assessment, relatively modest funding can be leveraged into significant cost and schedule savings, bringing needed capabilities to the operating forces sooner and cheaper. Each POM cycle provides examples of initiatives that are unfunded or delayed by an immature requirement or understanding of alternatives. In other cases the initiative is funded but the acquisition cycle stretches out until the requirement is better understood. Pre Phase A facilitates a timely and more efficient process.

FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.953 0.000 0.000

UNCLASSIFIED

Project Cost

Pre-Phase A Activities include assessments, surveys, and planning activities in support of the requirements generation system to mature, limit, clarify and define requirements before competition for resources in the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) process and transition to acquisition management. This effort will complement the currently funded Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Phase A Activities line to pursue a limited range of items on a priority basis, examining critical issues and alternatives. Examples of activities include but are not limited to (1) development of Operational Mode Summaries, Mission Profiles, Concepts of Employment and Acquisition Objectives, (2) mapping between legacy systems and replacements, (3) examining integration and family of systems architectural issues, (4) performing Doctrine, Organization, Training, Equipment, Support, Facilities (DOTESF) assessments and providing other key support for the Universal Needs Statement (UNS) process, (5) base-lining POM initiatives, (6) planning requirements support of evolutionary acquisition, (7) facilitating user/advocate interaction to better understand what is needed and how it will be used, and (8) supporting the Marine Requirements Oversight Council (MROC)-directed tailoring Authorized Acq

Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) averages approximately 62 UNS requests per year addressing new requirements, of which approximately 20% require expedited processing. Quick reaction assessment and planning is likely to support requirements emerging from current real world operations. Clear Facilities, a Command Element (CE) Army Research Laboratory (ARL) item (supported by the Marine Corps Ground Combat Element (GCE)) requiring a continuum of materiel solutions (family of systems) to enable lethal clearing of a broad range of man-made structures in multiple environments/tactical situations typifies a requirement needing pre-Phase A support. Supporting activities have centered around decomposition of the mission into 460 specific tasks accompanied by development of an operational concept, objectives and key performance parameters, and warfighter prioritization. The end product will be a requirements road map. The end state will be a process and product to guide both POM and acquisition activities.

- Professional support for the facilitation of working groups, research, analysis, and documentation for the development and staffing of Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Capability Development Document CDD, and Capability Production Document (CPD).


0.000 2.500

Due to limited personnel assigned to the Front End Assessment (FEA) Branch and within the Integration Divisions (IDs), additional resources are needed in order to properly identify and document materiel and non-materiel solutions for POM-10.

FY 2006 FY 2007

0.000 0.000

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

Professional support for the facilitation of working groups, research, analysis, and documentation for the development and staffing of Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Capability Development Document (CDD) and Capability Production Document (CPD). This support is above and beyond the Front End Assessment (FEA) effort and would enable the Intelligence Integration Division (IID) to have dedicated focus on developing and staffing Joint Capability Integrated Development System (JCIDS) documents that most accurately reflect needed materiel solutions to meet USMC ISR capability requirements.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

Support Functional solutions analysis and Initial Capability Document (ICD) development for Mobility Initiatives (air and ground), Route Clearance, Sniper Capabilities, Combat Camera and Public Affairs capabilities.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 158

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2a, page 1 of 3)



UNCLASSIFIED








FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.600 0.000 0.000

Subject Matter Expertise (SME) and analytical support for Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future) (MPF(F)) program support; experimentation coordination and requirements. Function as Operations Officer (OpsO) during exercises and attend all meetings. Ensure USMC interests are represented and experimentation is focused on issues that support Seabasing concept (in addition to Program Office concerns).

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.800 0.000 0.000

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Support to coordinate USMC equities in Joint Integrated Base, Installation, and Unit and Biometrics Program and Joint Biometrics. Capabilities Based Assessments (CBAs) are beginning with USMC equities that need to be covered on a full time basis.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.900 0.000 0.000

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) document development and staffing support for Logistics Integration Division (LID) Branches and Sections to support LID branches and section with post Functional Needs Analysis / Functional Solution Analysis (FNA/FSA) JCIDS document development that directly ties to POM-10 new start programs.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 1.200 0.000 0.000

Operational Architecture Support Department of Defense (DoD) has established policy and procedures that mandates the requirement for integrated architectures products to support the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) process. Every Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Capability Development Document (CDD) and Capability Production Document (CPD) produced out of MCCDC requires a set of integrated architecture products, including operational views. Before MCSC can field a system to the Fleet Marine Force (FMF), all JCIDS documentation must be completed. JCIDS Support to coordinate USMC equities in Joint Integrated Base, Installation, and Unit and Biometrics Program and Joint Biometrics. Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA)s are beginning with USMC equities that need to be covered on a full time basis.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.528 0.000 0.000

FORCEnet Subject Matter Expert (SME) MITRE Architectures is a Navy program. It is the concept for all Navy Command and Control (C2). USMC must develop its side of the interface to FORCEnet. Without the architecture development by Command and Control Integration Division (C2ID), the USMC will not have an interface to FORCEnet.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000 0.278 0.000 0.000

The Command and Control (C2) Campaign Plan effort supports Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) by preparing a communications plan to provide the warfighters insight into the current Marine Air Ground Task Force Command and Control (MAGTF C2) Capabilities Framework and Portfolio Management approach to fielding a Holistic, end to end, C2 capability that is fully integrated, across warfighter functions and supports reach-back as well as deployed users in support of Base Telephone Infrastructure (BTI) requirements.





UNCLASSIFIED






(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 11.954 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) FY 2007 Supplemental 10.142 (U) Reprogrammings

(U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.064 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 22.032 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:(U)

(U) Schedule: Not applicable. (U) Technical: Not applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 20090.000

0.000 1.060 0.000 0.000

0.000 0.000

Functional Area Management (Mgt)/Warfighting Mgt Analysis Joint Command and Control (JC2) - The Functional Area Manager (FAM)/Warfighting Mission Area Community of Interest (WMACOI)/JC2 effort supports Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) by addressing emerging UUNS and warfighter requirements and ensuring that they are represented and accounted for in the various Warfighter Mission Area Communities of Interests Working Groups and ensuring that these emerging Warfighter Command and Control (C2) Requirements (like Real time collaboration, planning and execution as defined in the Command Post Of the Future UUNS are incorporated into the USMC service specific requirements for the Global Command and Control System (GCCS)/JC2 follow-on program of record Net-enabled Command and Control.

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009

10.142

0.550 0.000 0.000

Synchronize and integrate various Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Documents and supporting efforts in the development and implementation of the Marine Air Ground Task Force Command and Control (MAGTF C2) strategy for Marine Corps Capability Development Document (MCCDC) to integrate the analysis from the various concurrent MAGTF C2 JCIDS documentation efforts and ensure that an "end to end" fully integrated cross-functional set of MAGTF C2 capabilities is envisioned in the appropriate JCIDS Documents.

Command and Control (C2) Combat Operations Center (COC) Capability Set (CAPSET) V - The C2 COC Operator Study effort supports Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) by incorporating lessons learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) I and II and Warfighter defined critical COC enhancements. This study will continue work on CAPSETS I-IV and address the small unit C2 platform. It provide analytical rigor behind Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) efforts by analyzing existing requirements Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROCM) Joint Blue Force Situational Awareness (JBFSA) convergence mandates and the requirement to be common, modular and scalable.

0.000 0.373



UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURERESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0205601N, HARM Improvement

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Total PE Cost TBD Rocket Improvements 2.230


A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

Current five inch rockets have great capabilities, however a requirement exists to procure thermobaric type warheads for Zuni Rockets, much like the Thermobaric warhead on the existing AGM-114NHellfire. Thermobaric properties provide little or no collateral damage, yet ensure destruction of the human target, which is essential in the current GWOT fight.

The Thermobaric Zuni will provide Rotary Wing and Fixed Wing aircrews with a thermobaric capability facilitating the GWOT fight and limiting collateral damage.

UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 5Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0205601N, HARM Improvement

B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

Funding: FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09Previous President's Budget: 0.000Current President's Budget 2.230Total Adjustments 0.000 2.230 0.000 0.000

Summary of AdjustmentsCongressional ReductionsCongressional RescissionsCongressional Undistributed ReductionsCongressional IncreasesEconomic AssumptionsFY 2007 Supplemental 2.230Subtotal 0.000 2.230 0.000 0.000

Schedule:

Technical:


N/A

N/A.

UNCLASSIFIED Page 2 of 5 Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIEDCLASSIFICATION:


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N, HARM Improvements TBD Rocket Improvements


Project Cost 2.230 RDT&E Articles Qty



Amount requested for FY2007 Supplemental: $2.23M. Funding is required to develop a thermobaric warhead for 5-inch rockets. Current five inch rockets have great capabilities, however a requirementexists to procure thermobaric type warheads for Zuni Rockets, much like the Thermobaric warhead on the existing AGM-114N Hellfire. Thermobaric properties provide little or no collateral damage, yetensure destruction of the human target, which is essential in the current GWOT fight. The Thermobaric Zuni will provide Rotary Wing and Fixed Wing aircrews with a thermobaric capability facilitatingthe GWOT fight and limiting collateral damage.

A new project titled Rocket Improvements will be created in this PE for this effort.

UNCLASSIFIED Page 3 of 5Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification

UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME

RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N, HARM Improvement TBD Rocket Improvements

B. Accomplishments/Planned Program

FY 2006 FY2007 FY 2008 FY 2009Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 2.230RDT&E Articles Quantity


February 2007

Includes design concept level I Technical Data Package and associated Preliminary Design Review and potential Critical Design Review tasking.


UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:



RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N, HARM Improvement TBD Rocket Improvements

C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: To Total

Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Complete CostNot Applicable

D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:


Concept design and qualification leading to production of an ECP for fielding.




APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURERESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements


Total PE Cost 0.500 0601, Common Ground Equipment 0.500



Expedtionary Airfields-Per Correlation Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC), Aviation Safety Alert Document Number 06-024 (Aircraft Grounding and Mooring) all aircraftdeployed in the (CFLCC) area of responsibility parked outside of a hanger must be grounded and moored. An urgent Universal needs statement has been submitted by forces forwardrequiring capability to both tie-down and ground aircraft at all bed-down locations in Iraq. Capability to install tie-downs on surfaces other than AM-2 Matting does not exist within theMarine Air Group Task Force. Grounding capabilities do exist. Therefore, there is a requirement to develop an aircraft tie-down and grounding capability in support of Global War onTerror.

Aircraft and personnel, and all other deployable aviation units, will be susceptibile to damage due to high winds, microbursts, rotor wash, lightning strikes and static electricity thuspotentially resulting in the loss of aircraft and personnel and directly impacting the Marine Expeditionary airfields' ability to project aviation combat power to its fullest capability.

UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 2Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements 0601, Common Ground Equipment


0.500 RDT&E Articles Qty(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION


COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty(U) Total $(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007

(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 3.051 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Title IX Appropriations 10.350 (U) FY07 Supplemental 0.500


(U) Schedule: N/A (U) Technical: N/A

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost

4208000 Aviation Support Equipment (OPN BA-3) 3.500 3.500

(U) Related RDT&E: N/A

UNCLASSIFIED

0.500


Project Cost


(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: N/A

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Starting with the current AM-2 mooring (tie-down) capabilities, testing will be done and some modifications. There are commercial grounding capabilities available that will have to be tested and modified as necessary to meet the grounding requirement.

0.500

(U) Funding: See above.

FY 2007 Supplemental0.000


Expedtionary Airfields-Per Correlation Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC), Aviation Safety Alert Document Number 06-024 (Aircraft Grounding and Mooring) all aircraft deployed in the (CFLCC) area of responsibility parked outside of a hanger must be grounded and moored. An urgent Universal needs statement has been submitted by forces forward requiring capability to both tie-down and ground aircraft at all bed-down locations in Iraq. Capability to install tie-downs on surfaces other than AM-2 Matting does not exist within the Marine Air Group Task Force. Grounding capabilities do exist. Therefore, there is a requirement to develop an aircraft tie-down and grounding capability in support of Global War on Terror.

Aircraft and personnel, and all other deployable aviation units, will be susceptibile to damage due to high winds, microbursts, rotor wash, lightning strikes and static electricity thus potentially resulting in the loss of aircraft and personnel and directly impacting the Marine Expeditionary airfields' ability to project aviation combat power to its fullest capability.

Developmental Testing and Operational Testing Starting with the current AM-2 mooring (tie-down) capabilities, testing will be done and some modifications. There are commercial grounding capabilities available that will have to be tested and modified, as necessary, to meet the grounding requirement.


UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit R-2a, RDTE,N Project Justification

(Exhibit R-2a, 2 of 2)

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) NAME AND NO.RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational System Development 0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems


165.208

28.300

46.600

49.000

7.000

3.500

8.900

2.400

19.508



(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 218.460 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases 16.250 (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 165.208 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -1.002 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 398.916


C2275 Radio Systems

C3099 Radar Systems

DATE: February 2007

C2274 C2 Warfare Systems

C2272 Intelligence C2 Systems

C2273 Air Operations C2 Systems


Total PE Cost

C2270 Command Post Systems

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

This program element provides funding to develop the command and control (C2) support and information infrastructures for the Fleet Marine Force and supporting establishment. Doctrinally, the C2 support system and the information infrastructure form two parts of a triad of capabilities which permits command and control systems to be transformed into a complete operating system. The third element of the triad is command and control organization and is not covered in this program element. USMC command and control is divided into seven functional areas and one supporting functional area as follows: intelligence C2, fire support C2, air operations C2, radio systems C2, combat service support C2, warfare C2, radar systems C2, and C2 support (information processing and communications).

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

Within this program element, subprojects have been grouped by C2 functional area for more efficient planning. Air defense weapons systems have been added to facilitate planning and a separate project is used for systems assigned to the supporting establishment. Subprojects which support the commander's decision processes have been collected into the Command Post Systems project since these systems must work in close cooperation to ensure effective C2 of Marine Air Ground Task Forces.

C2510 MAGTF CSSE & SE


C2906 Marine Corps Information Technology

R-1 Line Item No. 186

1 of 26


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems C2270 Command Post Systems


28.300





RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) Total $

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 15.095 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget:

(U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogramming (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.065 (U) FY07 Supplemental 28.300 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 43.330 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

C2PC: MAGTF C2 MS B Entrance Criteria Support. CDDE/ISP, TEMP, SEP,Acq Strat, Technology assessment, Functional Baseline, LCCE.

COST ($ in Millions) C2PC: Systems Engineering and T&E for Development. Necessary ECP work for CPOF integration, Aviation/Ground Combat Element functionality deconfliction, implementation of DISR/Open

Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost

0.000 0.000

FY 2008 FY 2009 C2PC: C2PC Software Development. Refactoring Phase II for modifying software to meet NECC and Single Joint Capability requirements by standardizing and modularizing C2PC code

FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental0.000 0.000

0.000 1.500 0.000 0.000

0.000

RDT&E Articles Qty

FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008

9.800

C2PC: Development for MAGTF C2 Spiral Zero Implementation. JREAP C, JREAP A, and web services interface functionality for exchange of Link 16 air and ground tracks, overlays, routes, C2 FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009


Project Cost

FY 2006(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:

C2PC Capability (NECC) and MAGTF C2 Spiral One, while also executing an aggressive life cycle support program for fielded capability throughout the Marine Corps. There are two separate but interrelated baselines of software development and support. The Common Operating Environment (COE) Unix baseline, which is Unix based server systems and the C2PC baseline which is a Windows based tactical workstations/system used at thecompany and above levels. A “light” version of C2PC has also been developed and fielded (C2CE) for hand-held for tactical workstations/systems used at the platoon and below level.

FY 2009

Reason funds are required: Joint operations in Afghanistan and Iraq highlighted new JTCW requirements for GWOT, and deficiencies in joint interoperability that must be resolved via JTCW. Requested funds support new JTCW functionality required by emergent Joint and Marine Corps requirements such as Single Joint Capability (SJC), Network Enabled Command Capability (NECC) and MSGTF C2 Spiral One. Further, the funding will allow continued C2 convergence with the Army in support of GWOT and OIF as Mandated by JROCM 163-04. Funds will also provide for integration and test support required by COC/CPOF/JTCW convergence, and to support JCIDS analysis requirements to transition urgent war fighter convergence efforts into a formalized Program of Record. Impact if not funded: If unfunded, joint operations in support of GWOT will be suboptimized; GWOT-related USMC requirements will not be met; JCTW will not be able to prepare for formal MAGTF C2 program initiation in FY08, initial NECC fielding in FY08, continued C2 convergence with the Army, nor developement of the SJC requirements and capability.

0.000

0.000

28.300 0.000 0.000

5.000

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186(Exhibit R-2a, Page 2 of 26)

DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development 0206313M Marine Corps Communications SystemsCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


C2PC RCP NGMS, SAN DIEGO 0.000 16.300 08/07 Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 16.300 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Compl Cost

C2PC TBD 0.000 12.000 08/07 12.000 Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09


Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Compl Cost

Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Total Cost 0.000 0.000 28.300 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:

C2270 Command Post Systems

R-1 Line Item No. 186(Exhibit R-3, Page 3 of 26)


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2272 Intelligence C2 Systems

FY 2007FY 2006 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

46.600


Project CostRDT&E Articles Qty


Technical Control Analysis Center (TCAC). The primary mission of the TCAC is to provide the Radio Battalions (RadBn) with an automated Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) processing, analysis, and reporting capability. The TCAC system is designed to receive collected intelligence from tactical, theater and National level producers and provide a multi-source fused intelligence production capability to support the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) commander via the Intelligence Analysis System (IAS), as well as the National Security Agency (NSA) and other National consumers.

Tactical Exploitation Group (TEG) - The TEG System is the only tactical imagery exploitation system in the United States Marine Corps (USMC) and is one of the four systems comprising the Distributed Common Ground\Surface System-Marine Corp (DCGS-MC). The modular and scaleable TEG employs a tiered approach comprised of two echelon-tailored configurations: the TEG-Main (TEG-M) and the TEG Remote Workstation (TEG-RWS). The TEG-M receives and processes national, theater, and tactical imagery and supplies the commander and subordinate commanders with exploitation reports and secondary imagery products for tactical operations, strike planning, precision targeting, detection and location of targets of opportunity, and battle damage assessment for restrike planning and intelligence assessment. The TEG-RWS provides imagery support to subordinate units within the MEF that do not require full TEG-M support. The TEG is also interoperable with the Army’s Tactical Exploitation System (TES), the USAF Intelligence Systems Reconnaissance Manager (ISRM), the DCGS-Navy (DCGS-N) and other USMC C4I systems.

Intelligence Broadcast Receiver (IBR) provides Marine tactical commanders access to National level Near Real-Time intelligence data provided over the Integrated Broadcast Service. IBR is employed across the MAGTF echelons through the following Host Systems; Intelligence Analysis System; Tactical Air Operations Center; Technical Control and Analysis Center; Tactical Air Command Center; Joint STARS Common Ground Station; Tactical Electronic Reconnaissance Processing and Evaluation System and Common Air Command and Control Systems and Joint Stars Work Station.

(U) Intelligence Command and Control (C2) supports the employment of reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition resources and the timely planning and processing of all-source intelligence. It ensures that all-source tactical intelligence is tailored to meet specific mission requirements. The systems below collect and convert raw intelligence data on the battlefield into processed information and deliver the processed products to the Intelligence Analysis Systems (IAS) for analysis and dissemination. Reason funds are required: The RAID/G-BOSS funds are requested to address a previously non-existent requirement to assist ground operating forces in their efforts to conduct Counter-Insurgency (COIN) operations in support of OIF/OEF and avoid additional losses of life and equipment. Impact if funds are not provided: If these initiatives are not funded, it will negatively impact the Marine Corps intelligence infrastructure and its ability to meet evolving threats in the intelligence area.




(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty IBR: Engineering and technical service support. COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost

IBR: Contract and Program Support.

Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty



FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008

1.000FY 2009


RDT&E Articles Qty

TEG: Development of man-portable and reduced form-factor Common Data Link (CDL) capability.

FY 2009

0.750FY 2008

FY 2008

0.250

TEG: Development and integration of mandated DCGS/DIB interfaces and communication architectures.

FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009

FY 2006 FY 2009

TEG: Engineering, development, integration, test and security accreditation and integrated logistics support for Enhanced and TEG-RWS functionality.

FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental

Distributed Common Ground/Surface System-Marine Corps (DCGS - MC) - formerly known as Distributed Common Ground/Surface-Integration (DCGS-I), is a collection of Service Systems that will contribute to joint and combined warfighter needs for ISR support, with the Global Information Grid (GIG) providing unconstrained communications circa 2010 to support the Department of Defense (DoD) Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Enterprise end-state. The DCGS Integrated Backbone (DIB) is the architecture that will tie the Service DCGS systems together into one Family of Systems (FOS). The DIB will provide the tools, standards, architecture, and documentation for the DCGS community to achieve a Multi-Intelligence (Multi-INT) (e.g. Imagery Intelligence (IMINT), Signal Intelligence (SIGINT), Measurement/Measuring and Signature Intelligence (MASINT), Counterintelligence/Human Intelligence (CI/HUMINT)), network centric environment with the interoperability to afford individual nodes’ access to the information needed to execute their respective missions to include Irregular Warfare. The Marine Corps will conduct DIB integration research and development to meet a congressionally mandated implementation deadline.


0.500

1.000

Ground-Based Operational Surveillance System (G-BOSS) - A 24-hour persistent ground-based operational surveillance system capable of displaying and tracking objects of interest. This family of systems is an integrated, network-capable platform that allows for remote viewing, storage, manipulation, and transmission of video. G-BOSS is intended to provide an organic remote imaging capability for both offensive and defensive roles across the MAGTF to enhance Marie forces ability to prevent or mitigate hostile actions against linear/nonlinear, area, borders, highways, rivers, pipelines, choke points and infrastructures.



APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2272 Intelligence C2 Systems COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostRDT&E Articles Qty








(U) Total $

DCGS-MC - Design and Development of Hardware and Enterprise Services and test and development support to include Studies, analysis and evaluation.

FY 2006

0.000

TCAC: Software development, integration and testing for TCAC with COE 4.X and future releases.

0.000 46.600

FY 2009

FY 2007 Supplemental FY 20080.550

0.000

FY 2008

10.100

ANGEL FIRE: Research and Development and Engineering support.


FY 2006 FY 2009

TCAC: Engineering future releases.


0.385FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009

FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 20091.500

0.565


TCAC: Program Management Support.

1.350

G-BOSS: Research and Development and Engineering support.


G-BOSS: Technical and Engineering Software support.


G-BOSS: Program Management and technical support for Technical and Evaluation support.



APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2272 Intelligence C2 Systems(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 26.672

(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Prog Reduction (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogramming (U) Supplemental 46.600 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.101

(U) FY 2007 Budget: 73.171

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See Above. (U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Cost

DCGSI 0.000 3.240 0.529 0.612 6.203 0.574 0.591 0.609 Cont Cont

TEG 4.103 0.267 1.070 1.353 1.813 0.299 0.308 0.317 0.000 9.530

IBR 0.582 0.401 1.050 0.000 1.070 1.090 0.447 0.460 Cont Cont

TCAC 0.869 3.904 0.945 1.127 0.000 0.772 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

(U) Related RDT&E: (U) PE 0301301L (Department of Defense Intelligence and Information Systems/Military Intelligence Integrated Data System/Integrated Data Base I and II) (U) PE 0604270A (Intelligence and Electronic Warfare Common Sensor (IEWCS), TACJAM-A)(U) PE 0305885G (Tactical Cryptologic Program)(U) PE 0603730A (Tactical Surveillance System - Advanced Development), Army TENCAP, Project D560(U) PE 0603766A (Tactical Electronic Surveillance System - Advanced Development), Army TENCAP, Project D907(U) PE 0604740A (Tactical Surveillance System - Engineering Development), OSD TENCAP, Project D662(U) PE 0902398M (United States Special Operations Command), Chariot Program(U) PE 0605867N (SEW Surveillance/Reconnaissance Support), Project Z1034

To Compl

PMC BLI 474700 Intel Support EqPMC BLI 474700 Intel Support Eq

PMC BLI 474700 Intel Support EqPMC BLI 465200 Mod Kit




DCGS-INAVY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (NSMA), MTC, Stafford, VA Provide Engineering & technical services, studies, analysis and evaluation for DIB integration, and integration support.

(U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY TCAC: The acquisition of components for the TCAC will maximize the use of existing equipment, NDI/COTS/GFE equipment/software. The integration effort for TCAC hardware components will be accomplished under the control of the SSA, MCSC. Software integration and support will be accomplished by contractors under the control of the Project Officer. These activities report to and are directed by the Program Manager, Intelligence Systems, Marine Corps Systems Command (MARCORSYSCOM). Maintenance support will be managed by MARCORLOGBASES Albany and MCSC, Albany and through separate contractual agreements.

(U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY IBR: In house contracts will be used to conduct engineering studies and test and evaluation activities associated with the Marine Corps implementation of the Integrated Broadcast Service, Common Message Format, ENTR integration and test and evaluation.

INTELLIGENCE BROADCAST RECEIVER (IBR) SPAWAR, Charleston, SC. Provide funds for integration, engineering, program management & contractual support. NAVY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (NSMA), (MTC, Stafford, VA ), Provide funds for engineering and technical support.

TACTICAL CONTROL AND ANALYSIS CENTER (TCAC) NAVY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (NSMA), (MTC, Stafford, VA ), Provide funds for engineering $ technical management support.

TACTICAL EXPLOITATION GROUP (TEG)

SPAWAR, Charleston, SC. Provide funds for integration, engineering, program management & contractual support. ARMY SPACE PROGRAM OFFICE, Washington, DC. Classified contract.NAVY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (NSMA), (MTC, Stafford, VA ), Provide funds for engineering and technical management support.

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:

(U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY DCGS-MC: The Marine Corps DCGS-MC project officer will leverage off of the USAF DCGS 10.2 Research, Development Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) effort and focus on the development of the DCGS Integrated Backbone (DIB) for the DCGS-MC.Additionally, the DCGS-MC will leverage off of MAGTF Legacy system DIB compliancy efforts.

(U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY TEG: The TEG Program Office leverages the advantages of its multi-service common software baseline and inherent Joint service interoperability. Development, integration, interoperability, security certification and accreditation and acquisition is divided between three prime contractors: Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, Baltimore, MD (NGB) (through a classified contract); Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Charleston, SC (SSCC), and MTC Services Corporation. An incremental refresh is currently ongoing for the TEG/RWS. A subsequent refresh will occur in FY08 for the TEG-M in order to keep systems modern and modular to meet emerging technologies.

(U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY G-BOSS: The integration effort for G-BOSS components will be accomplished under the control of the MCSC. Software integration and support will be accomplished by contractors under the control of the Project Officer through Naval Surface Warfare Center. Research and Development and engineering efforts will be support by SFAE, Ft Belvoir and U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command. These activities report to and are directed by the Program Manager, Intelligence Systems, Marine Corps Systems Command (MARCORSYSCOM).

GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (G-BOSS)

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CRANE IN. Provide funds for technical and engineering software support. PM NV RSTA, Ft. Belvoir. Provide funds for research and development and engineering support.U.S. ARMY SPACE & MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND, Redstone Arsenal, AL. Provide funds for Program Management and Technical support for Technical and Evaluation support.


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT DATE: February 2007RDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev C2272 Intelligence C2 Systems

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 orps Com FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value ofRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost ContractDCGSI RCP NSMA (MTC) 0.000 1.500 08/07 Cont ContJSIPS - TEG MPR ASPO 2.871 1.000 08/07 Cont ContJSIPS - TEG RCP NSMA (MTC) 4.709 0.250 08/07 Cont ContJSIPS - TEG MPR SPAWAR 0.489 0.750 08/07 Cont ContG-BOSS RCP NSWC 0.000 1.450 08/07 Cont ContTCAC MIPR SPAWAR 0.000 0.550 08/07

Subtotal Product Development 43.457 5.500 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value ofRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost ContractTCAC RCP NSMA (MTC) 1.675 0.200 08/07 Cont ContTCAC RCP MCSC 0.000 0.185 08/07 Cont ContIBR MIPR SPAWAR 0.109 0.500 08/07 Cont ContIBR RCP NSMA (MTC) 0.000 0.500 08/07 Cont ContG-BOSS MPR SFAE 0.000 1.350 08/07 Cont ContANGEL FIRE RCP NSMA (MTC) 0.000 10.100 08/07 Cont Cont Subtotal Support 15.546 12.835 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Cost Categories Contract Performing Target(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value ofRequirements) & Type Location Cost ContractG-BOSS MPR ARMY 0.000 27.200 08/07 Cont ContIBR RCP NSWC 0.000 0.500 08/07 Cont Cont Subtotal T&E 0.000 27.700 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 16.25 FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value ofRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost ContractTCAC WR NAWC 0 0.565 08/07 Subtotal Management 0.061 0.565 Cont Cont

Remarks:Total Cost 59.064 0.000 46.600 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Remarks:

Remarks:

0206313M Marine Corps Communications Sys

Remarks:



APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems

FY 2007FY 2006 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY2012 FY2013

49.000



COST ($ in Millions)Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost

RDT&E Articles Qty

0.000 0.000FY 2008 FY 2009FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental

0.000 0.500

0.00027.500

CAC2S: System Development and Demonstration (SDD). Engineering Development Model (EDM) hardware and software development, design of host processing system, and conduct software integration of Joint mandated applications, developmental testing

CAC2S: System development, Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), and testing in accordance with continued sensor interface/integration such as the TPS-59 local interface, communications interface/interoperability development.

0.000FY 2008 FY 2009

0.000

0.000



FY 2006

The Combat Operations Center (COC) is a deployable, self-contained, and centralized facility which provides digital, shared Command and Control/Situational Awarenesss functionalities to enhance the Common Operational Picture (COP) for the Command Element,

Project Cost

FY 2008 FY 2009FY 2006

0.0002.000

UNCLASSIFIED

RDT&E Articles Qty



February 2007

BTID: SDD Developmental Test Articles.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) will provide a common baseline of equipment, computer hardware, and software required to perform the mission of the Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS). CAC2S will provide a capability that allows operators to integrate Marine aviation into joint and combined air/ground operations. CAC2S will be an open architecture system. CAC2S will provide the software integration to ground C2 via Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC) functionality in order to improve air and ground situational awareness, blue force tracking and reduce the potential for fratricide.

Battlefield Target Identification Device (BTID) in FY07 Supplemental will be a cooperative battlefield target identification device that employs encrypted, Ka band, millimeter wave, question and answer technology. It will consist of interrogator and transponder antennae, transceiver, and communications/electrical interface unit. It will be fielded as two variants: interrogaror/transponder system for Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFVs), Light Amphibious Vehicles (LAVs), and M1A1s; and transponder-only system for combat support and combat service support vehicles. When fielded, mounted weapon systems will have the capability to identify targets as friendly or unknown, at ranges to 6 km, before engaging them. They and all other designated vehicles will also possess the capability to rapidly identify themselves as friendly to weapon systems equipped with comparable systems prior to being engaged. As a result, incidents of fratricide and collateral damage will decline, while the range at which targets may be engaged without fear of misidentification will increase dramatically. The system will be interoperable with Joint, Allied, and Coalition forces' cooperative target identification systems. Tier II/STUAS is a new start program that will provide persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) support for tactical level maneuver decisions and unit leve force defense/force protection for Navy ships and Marine Corps land forces.



(Exhibit R-2a, page 10 of 26



UNCLASSIFIED


February 2007


RDT&E Articles Qty




(U) Total Cost $

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 47.341 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional/OSD Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Supplemental 49.000 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.243 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 96.098 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.

COC: Program Management Support.

FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2009FY 20080.000

FY 2006

0.000 49.000

(U) Funding: Increased funds in FY 2007 is due to FY07 Expanded Supplemental Funding.

COC: Engineering and manufacturing development effort of CS2.

COC: Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I) for Capset 3 through 5.

0.000

FY 2008

BTID: Life Cycle Cost Estimate.

0.000 1.000

0.000

0.000 1.800

FY 2006

FY 200810.800


FY 2006


0.000

0.000FY 2008 FY 2009FY 2007 SupplementalFY 2006

5.400 0.000

0.000 0.000

0.000FY 2009

FY 2009

0.0000.000






UNCLASSIFIED


February 2007

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost3.759 35.531 0.000 20.727 35.207 48.550 49.804 15.138 Cont Cont

11.145 1.892 1.859 1.776 6.423 1.222 1.222 1.226 Cont Cont0.000 0.000 0.000 6.324 9.054 7.368 8.090 8.217 Cont Cont1.049 7.574 7.988 19.111 22.901 28.257 17.407 18.298 Cont Cont0.000 0.000 0.000 13.389 20.165 9.462 18.794 15.734 Cont Cont


FY07 MarCorSysCom support for component led competitive SDD phase.

MACCS SUSTAINMENT

FY07 Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane, IN. ADCP, CIS, DASCAS, CDLS Engineering services. Oct 03

(U) PMC, BLI #464000, MACCS SUSTAINMENT

(U) TIER II UAS: The program office expects to utilize a competitive acquisition approach to quickly field a capability with limited development. Spiral development will be utilized to field a system fully compliant with documented requirements.

FY07 Lockheed Martin, NY. System development, demonstration, integration, test and evaluation. Feb 06

(U) COC: The Combat Operations Center (COC) is the foundation of USMC C2, meeting communications and network requirements in the near term, and will continue spiral development as it evolves into a fully, integrated MAGTF C2 capability by 2015.

FY07 General Dynamics Decision Systems, Scottsdale AZ. System development, demonstration, integration, test and evaluation. Apr 04.

BTID

FY07 SPAWAR, Charleston SC. Support Services. Jan 05

FY07 Carisle Research Incorporated, Van Nuys, CA. TAOM Software Sustainment services. Feb 06

(U) MCTIS (BTID): Analysis and action by the Army Marine Corps Board in March 2006 directed a Army led Component Program, which will complete for resources in the FY-08 Service POMs. As a Component lead activity the Marine Corps will resource unique Mar

FY07 Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, Woodland Hills, CA. TAOC Engineering and CETS services. Jan 04

COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER (COC)(U) E. Major Performers:

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S)

(U) PMC, BLI #464000, BTIS

(U) CAC2S: The Systems Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase was implemented after the successful completion of the established Program Definition Risk Reduction (PDRR) phase exit criteria. The SDD phase includes the development and verification of

(U) PMC, BLI #419000, COC

(U) PMC, BLI #464000, CAC2S

(U) PMC, BLI #464000, Tier II UAS




UNCLASSIFIEDDATE:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Comm C2273 Air Operations C2 SystemsCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target Value& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

CAC2S RCP 27.500 01/07 0.000 27.500CAC2S RCP 2.000 01/07 0.000 2.000COC RCP General Dynamics 10.530 12/06 0.000 10.530COC WR SSC Charleston 5.670 12/06 0.000 5.670BTID WR NSWC, Crane, IN 0.500 01/07 0.000 0.500 Subtotal Product Development 0.000 0.000 46.200 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target Value& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

BTID TBD TBD 1.000 TBD 0.000 1.000 Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Remarks:


COC RCP 1.170 12/06 0.000 1.170COC WR 0.630 12/06 0.000 0.630 Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 1.800 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont


SSC Charleston

February 2007

Raytheon, San Diego, CA

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis

Lockheed Martin, NY

General Dynamics AZ


UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis

(Exhibit R-3, page 13 of 26


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev C2274 Command & Control Warfare Systems


7.000



RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) Total $


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 3.827 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional/OSD Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 14.529 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments

(U) FY 2007 Budget: 18.356


(U) Related RDT&E:(U) (U) PE 0305885G (Tactical Cryptologic Program)

(U) Command and Control (C2) Warfare Project includes the following tactical electronic intercept, direction finding, and electronic attack systems:

(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM

Counter Radio Controlled Improvised Explosive Device (RCIED) and Elect Warfare (Jammers/CREW) provides full spectrum protection against high and low power threats. The RCIED is capable of being integrated in all Marine Corps Tactical Ground Vehicles. This program is an ongoing effort to develop new techniques to improve the capabilities of the system by doing enhancements to software and to deveop upgrades in order to prevent technology obsolescence. Reason funds are required: The CESAS and CREW funds are requested to address emergent technological requirements to assist ground operating forces in their efforts to conduct Counter-Insurgency (COIN) operations in support of OIF/OEF and avoid additional losses of life and equipment.Impact if funds are not provided: If these initiatives are not funded, it will negatively impact the Marine Corps intelligence infrastructure and its ability to meet evolving threats in the intelligence area.

Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostFY 2009FY 2007 SupplementalFY 2006 FY 2008

February 2007


Project Cost

RDT&E Articles Qty

Program Element0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems

0.000

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:CREWNAVSEA, (JHUAPL), Baltimore, MD. Provide radio frequency engineering and test support.NSWC, (Dahlgren), Dahlgren, VA. Provide co-site mitigation for fielded assets and test support.NSWC, (CRANE), Crane, IN. Provide logistics, radio frequency mapping and engineering support. SPAWAR, Charleston, NC. Provide system integration, test support, and logistics.


0.0007.000 0.000

7.000 RCIED: Logistics, Systems Engineering, Research, and Test support


Exhibit R-3 Cost AnalysisAPPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2274 Command & Control Warfare SystemsCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target Value& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Comp Cost of Contract

Subtotal Product Development 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 (Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target ValueRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Comp Cost of ContractRCIED MPR SPAWAR 0.000 2.300 08/07RCIED RCP NSWC 0.000 2.000 08/07 Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 4.300 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target ValueRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Comp Cost of Contract

RCIED MPR NAVSEA 0.000 1.700 08/07RCIED MPR NSWC 0.000 1.000 08/07 Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 2.700 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Remarks:Total Cost 0.000 0.000 7.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Date: February 2007


DATE: February 2007

PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2275 Very Small Aperature Terminal


3.500


(U) Total $

FY 20090.350

FY 2008

FY 2009

(U) Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) - VSAT provides beyond line-of-sight (BLOS), low-cost satellite communications up to speeds of 4 Mbps full duplex. VSAT fills a void of BLOS, high bandwidth capability within the Marine Logistics Group (MLG), Division, Wing, and MEUs. VSAT is an On-the-Pause (OTP) communications asset. It can be set up in 30 minutes or less once a unit has stopped to establish communications. VSAT will be used as an intra-MEF satellite communications asset. It will rely upon LMST/Phoenix or TSC-85/93 links to provide Defense Information Systems Network (DISN) services via the Strategic Tactical Entry Points (STEP) or Teleport facilities.

FY 2009Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost

VSAT: Contract support costs.

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys DevelopmentAPPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY


RDT&E Articles Qty

Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost

VSAT: Operational Test and Evaluation


Project Cost

RDT&E Articles Qty

The VSATs are currently Ku-band only which requires commercial satellite connectivity. Future upgrades will utilize the military's Wideband Gapfiller Satellites to save on long term O&M costs. R&D work will need to bedone to ensure that VSAT can transition from Ku to Ka-band. Reason funds are required: Funds are needed to fulfill equipment requirements resulting from the establishment of new operational units. Impact if funds are not provided: The program office will need to rely upon the Army to ensure the Marine Corps VSATs are compatible with WGS satellites. Some of the Marine VSATs are identical to the Army VSATs but some are not. In order to eliminate risk throughout the program, research needs to be done on all VSATs migrating to WGS.(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:


VSAT: Tropo Development on Large Variant SWAN


0.700


FY 2006 FY 2008

FY 2009

VSAT: Develop and test component upgrades for integration for Ka-Band Upgrades.RDT&E Articles Qty


RDT&E Articles Qty

FY 2008FY 2007 Supplemental

0.400

0.700

0.000

FY 2008

3.500 0.0000.000


VSAT: NPS Studies on Commercial SATCOM/Wireless Technologies



FY 2006

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006

RDT&E Articles QtyAccomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost 0.500

FY 2009 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006

RDT&E Articles QtyVSAT: MCTSSA Integration Testing

Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal CostFY 2006

0.500FY 2008FY 2007 Supplemental

FY 2009FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008

VSAT: Travel/TAD COST ($ in Millions)


DATE: February 2007

PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems C2275 Very Small Aperature Terminal


RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys DevelopmentAPPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 14.612 (U) Adjustments from the NAVCOMPT Budget: (U) Congressional/OSD Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 3.500 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.055 (U) FY 2007 Budget 18.057 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See Above. (U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. & Name FY2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost

(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable


(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:FY07 VSAT DataPath, Inc., Duluth, GA KA-BAND AND TROPO INTEGRATION & UPGRADE, FEB - 07.

(U) Very Small Aperature Terminal - VSAT- The Acquisition Strategy for VSAT is to continue to procure COTS equipment through the Army's PM WIN-T office under the Worldwide Satellite Services (WWSS) contract. The Marine Corps will continue to follow the Army's Joint Network Node (JNN) topology for the network equipment and will continue to procure the Army's JNN trailer for the Marine Corps large variant VSAT. The VSATs will be upgraded to perform in both the Ku and Ka-bands.


DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT 0206313MPROJECT NUMBER AND NAME

RDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev C2275 Very Small Aperature Terminal (VSAT)Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY09(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY07 Award FY 08 Award FY09 Award Cost to Total Target ValueRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of ContractVSAT Ka-Band Upgrade MIPR PM WIN-T, CECOM 0.700 08/07 Cont ContVSAT Tropo Upgrade MIPR PM WIN-T, CECOM 0.700 08/07 Cont Cont Subtotal Product Development 1.400 Cont ContRemarks:

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target ValueRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of ContractVSAT Contractor Support FFP MARCORSYSCOM 0.350 07/07 Cont ContTravel/TAD FFP MARCORSYSCOM 0.400 08/07 Cont Cont Subtotal Support 0.750 Cont ContRemarks:

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Target ValueRequirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of ContractVSAT Operational Testing FFP MCOTEA 0.350 07/07 Cont Cont

0.500 01/07 Cont Cont0.500 06/07 Cont Cont

Subtotal T&E 1.350 Cont Cont

Total Cost 3.500 Cont Cont

Remarks:

MCTSSA Integration TestingVSAT NPS Thesis Support

0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems


February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems C2510 MAGTF CSSE & SE



GCSS-MC is the IT solution for logistics transformation being developed by the Integrated Logistics Center (ILC). The ILC Analysis was completed during an 18-week engagement beginning in late October 1998 to early February 1999. This analysis concluded with a high-level Business Case Analysis (BCA). The BCA concluded conservatively that accomplishing the ILC actions (including re-engineered IT among others) would reduce Marine Corps inventories and reduce support requirements allowing the shifting of (2000) Marines from logistics to the battlefield by 2004 (given the current timelines). ILC action will also result in: lighter, more flexible and easier to move MAGTF; Higher Combat Service Support (CSS) responsiveness: reduced stocks and CSS footprint inside the MAGTF; Less equipment for Warfighter to manage; Rapidly scaleable and deployable CSS units that have worldwide inventory visibility. Access to more reliable, accurate and actionable information that clarifies the logistics situational awareness; near real time visibility of requests for products and services allowing higher confidence and trust in logistics; and the ability to operate with greater certainty. The resulting capability is referred to as a shared data environment. ***C2510 $2.352M of FY06 Funds will be used to Forward Finance FY07 for GCSS

(U) The MAGTF Combat Service Support Element & Supporting Establishment (CSSE & SE) consists of mutually supporting Logistics Information Technology (IT) programs that support force deployment, planning, and execution; sustainment and distribution; and contribute to the Combatant Commander's Common Operating Picture (COP) to support rapid accurate decision making.

Secondary capabilities and aspects of some of the above are achieved through integration with the Manpower, Acquisition and other portfolios as well as integration with Joint and other Service systems. This integration will migrate the current Shared Data Environment (SDE), Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS), and Automated Information Technology (AIT) to an integrated Detailed Planning and Current Operations System over the long-term. The capabilities are to be matched against systems remaining after the system realignment and categorization process and then assessed for compliance, alignment and cost effectiveness versus readily available COTS and GOTS products. The GCSS-MC portfolio seeks to most effectively achieve the mandated requirements through provisioning of the capabilities not extending specific systems.

Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps (GCSS-MC) is the physical implementation of the enterprise information technology architecture designed to support both improved and enhanced MAGTF Combat Service Support functions and MAGTF Commander and Combatant Commander/Joint Task Force (JTF) combat support information requirements. As such, GCSS-MC is not a single system but a portfolio of information technology capabilities tied to discrete performance measures that support required combat service support mission objectives. Reason funds are required: Supports GCSS-MC risk reduction and acceleration of Block 1. Funds will also enable acceleration of block 2 development, test, and build, in order to incorporate warehousing management, transportation, and distribution capability as well as develop and incorporate Log C2 capabilities (replacing bridge technologies). Impact if funds are not provided: ASN (RDA) has directed acceleration of the GCSS-MC Block 1 program. Without supplemental funds the program cannot be accelerated. Development of future blocks of GCSS-MC will be delayed thereby requiring the maintenance and operation of current legacy logistics IT systems. In addition, continued investment to maintain and further develo

The Integrated Logistics Concept (ILC) Analysis provided the foundation for logistics transformation within the Marine Corps and established a compliance response to Defense Reform Initiative Directive (DRID) 54, directing that logistics transformation be accomplished throughout the service components. Immediately following the guidance of DRID 54, the GCSS-Capstone Requirements Document (CRD) was approved by the JROC. GCSS-MC is the IT solution to accomplish the transformation and GCSS objectives. GCSS-MC is an integrated set of capabilities. The capabilities will be implemented within a bottoms-up (programs of record) approach within a portfolio of systems. The portfolio of systems contributes to the primary capabilities of GCSS-MC. External portfolios will also contribute secondary to GCSS-MC capabilities through integration strategies. Primary capabilities are supply chain and combat service support oriented.


Project Cost


February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems C2510 MAGTF CSSE & SE


(U) Total $(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 35.311

(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.133 (U) Supplemental Funding 8.900 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 44.078


(U) Schedule: As a result of technical and contractual problems with the Systems Integrator which resulted in contract termination, the GCSS-MC Program has been delayed one year. The revised schedule is reflected in the updated acquisition strategy. The program is currently on schedule as revised. (U) Technical:


PMC BLI 461700 COMBAT SPT SYS: GCSS 13.969 0.000 0.000 3.286 3.190 9.353 10.500 7.292

(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable.

RDT&E Articles Qty


8.900FY 2008 FY 2009

The central procuring office for AIT hardware in the Marine Corps. This will enable the Marine Corps to standardize hardware (such as bar-code scanners or passive RFID interrogators and across the Marine Corps. 3. The AIT Program Office also conducts research and development of new technologies and assists in technology insertion into applications. This R&D capability enhances the Marine Corps' capability to quickly assimilate emerging technologies and leverage them to support more efficient, accurate business processes and data capture.


(U) Funding:

8.900

GCSS-MC Logistics Chain Management: Program/Engineering support, analysis, integration, development, testing, and enhancements for blocks one (1) through three (3). Supplemental funding ($8.9M) will be used to reduce risk and accelerate Block 1 in accordance with ASN (RD&A) direction to accelerate GCSS-MC Block 1 by seven months.


February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Dev 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems C2510 MAGTF CSSE & SE(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY09 - Oracle, Reston, VA - Software, Training and Consulting; Northrop Grumman, Stafford, Va - Consulting and Engineering Support; SI Oct 08;

GCSS:

Marine Corps Operational Testing & Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) - Testing & Evaluation - Oct 08

Blocks will include emergent user priorities, advanced technology improvements and expanded functionality. Each Block will repeat the complete acquisition program cycle starting with Milestone (MS) A for the first Block for LCM and MS B thereafter going through a MS C Full Rate Production Decision Review (FRPDR) for each Block. LCM is an ACAT IAM program. LCM has passed MS A. The tentative date are for LCM MS B is during the 2nd quarter FY07 and MS C during the 3rd quarter FY08, with fielding to begin in the 4th quarter FY08 with continued block upgrades thereafter. FOC is validated when all Marine Corps ground components are using capabilities provided by GCSS-MC LCM to include formal schools, and selected Marine Reserve Components and the following systems are no longer used operationally: SASSY, ATLASS I, MIMMS, and PC MIMMS.


Marine Corps Hardware Suites (MCHS): To insure computer hardware in the operating forces keeps pace with industry computer hardware technical improvements.

GCSS-MC: Is a portfolio of systems. The approach is to enable Marine Corps Logistics Modernization through two main programs, Logistics Chain Management (LCM) and Logistics Command and Control (LOG C2). LOG C2 will end in FY06. GCSS-MC will pursue an Evolutionary Acquisition (EA) strategy in order to field operationally suitable and supportable capabilities in the shortest time possible. EA offers the fastest method to field this highest of Advocate priorities and allows for requirements to be time-phased as the users become more familiar with the fielded systems’ strengths and weaknesses. In addition to quicker fielding, an EA approach is particularly well suited to software intensive programs and offers these benefits: rapidly delivers an initial capability with the explicit intent of delivering continuously improved capability in the future and reduces “cycle time” from identification of emergent user requirements, priorities and fielding. The GCSS-MC acquisition strategy for each program will be to deliver capabilities in Blocks. Each Block is divided into two main phases: Planning/Blueprinting and Realization/Transition. More substantial software improvement/system upgrades will be fielded with each Block, as required and prioritized by the user community.

Marine Corps Operational Testing & Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) - Testing & Evaluation - Oct 07

FY06 - Oracle, Reston, VA - Software, Training and Consulting; Northrop Grumman, Stafford, Va - Consulting and Engineering Support; SI Jan 06 Marine Corps Operational Testing & Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) - Testing & Evaluation - Feb/Mar 06FY07 - Oracle, Reston, VA - Software, Training and Consulting; Northrop Grumman, Stafford, Va - Consulting and Engineering Support; SI Oct 06 Marine Corps Operational Testing & Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) - Testing & Evaluation - Jan 07FY08 - Oracle, Reston, VA - Software, Training and Consulting; Northrop Grumman, Stafford, Va - Consulting and Engineering Support; SI Oct 07;


DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis December 2006APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development 0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems C2510 MAGTF CSSE SECost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value of& Type Location Cost Cost Date Date Cost Date Cost Date Compl Cost Contract

GCSS Logistics Chain Man FFP/C MCSC, Quantico, VA 8.900 08/06 8.900

Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 8.900 0.000 0.000Remarks:

FY07 Supplemental


EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE: February 2007


C2906 Marine Corps Information Technology COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007

FY 2006 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

0.000 2.400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000




(U) Total $(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 13.276** (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Prog Reduction (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 2.400 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment (U) FY 2007 Budget: 15.676 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See Above. (U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.NOTE **: $13.276 resides in BA 5, under PE 0605013M. $2.4M add was incorrectly places in BA 7 under this PE.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Cost(U) PMC BLI 463000 MCEITS 0.939 1.034 5.950 10.300 4.700 5.300 9.000 11.100 Cont ContACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY07 - Contractor TBDFY08 - Contractor TBDFY09 - Contractor TBD


MCEITS:

FY 2006 FY 2008

Fort Huachuca, AZ , TDMS, DMS Joint Interoperability Certifications (JIC) exercise, Jan 06

MCEITS:FY06 - SAIC , Mclean VA MCOTEA. Quantico, VA, Operational Test and Evaluation and Developmental Test and Evaluation testing

To Complete

Marine Corps Enterprise Information Technology Services (MCEITS) - This program element establishes, sustains and continuously refines computing platforms and Information Technology (IT) services as tested, certified and reusable components of a Marine Corps IT framework that spans the range of military operations from tactical warfighting to complex business systems.Reason funds are required: MCEITS has been tasked with planning convergence of GWOT pilots into standard platforms and services. These pilots are still operating and expanding in support of GWOT efforts. The TCWS has been forward deployed by I MEF into western Iraq and other suites are currently being fielded to II MEF, III MEF and MARFOR headquarters to improve tactical collaboration capabilities. In particular this RDT&E is needed to support the expanded test and evaluation of this pilot, provision of a systems integration capability, as well as to develop the requirements tracking effort, vMCCDC, CMC legislative testimony site and related organizational workflow that enable remote access for operating forces. This would provide developmental funds to link USMC portal efforts with joint systems (NCES/DKO) and more significantly permit the expansion of eHQMC to an enterprise eUSMC portal in both classified and unclassified environments.

0.000

2.400

FY 20090.000

0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems

RDT&E Articles Qty

Project Cost

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development

0.0002.400

Impact if funds are not provided: TCWS fielding efforts would not support evolving operating force needs by not having ability to validate known problems, develop workarounds, create standard changes and provide test bench for emergent needs. Additionally, lack of portal funding will lead to inability to sustain eHQMC development effort to provide interoperable services and manage GWOT requirements. Existing portal system support will be limited to corrective maintenance and cannot meet other GWOT and senior officer collaboration requirements. Classified collaboration will remain ad hoc and decision support and search tools will not be provided.

R-1 Line Item No. 186(Exhibit R-2a, page 23 of 26)

UNCLASSIFIED

DATE:

February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME

C2906 Marine Corps Information Technology Cost Categories Total FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Target

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value of& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract

MCEITS RCP MCSC, Quantico, VA 2.400

Within 60 days of

availability of funds Cont

Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 2.400 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks


Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development0206313M Marine Corps Communications Systems

R-1 Line Item No. 186 (Exhibit R-3, page 24 of 26)


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 OPERATIONAL SYS DEV C3099 RADAR SYSTEMS


19.508



RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) Total $ (C3099 Radar Systems)

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 55.746 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional/OSD Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) FY07 Supplemental 19.508 (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment(U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.219

(U) FY 2007 Budget 75.035 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See Above. (U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.


(U) PMC, BLI#465000, G/ATOR 0.000 0.000 0.000 17.000 104.453 113.826 137.000 150.758

(U) Related RDT&E: (U) PE 0206313M (Marine Corps Communication Systems),Project C9276.PROJECT C9639A PROJECT C9860A


0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems



Project CostRDT&E Articles Qty

The Multi-Role Radar System (MRRS) is also known programmatically as Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR). G/ATOR is a single material solution to fill the MRRS's and Ground Weapons Locating Radar's (GWLR) A160 requirements. It is an Evolutionary Acquisition/Incremental Development Program designed to reduce the Total Ownership Costs associated with the MRRS and GWLR systems. Increment I will fill the MRRS's Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD) mission and medium range Air Surveillance mission. Increment II will fill the GWLR's Counter Fire/Counter Battery missions. Increment III will develop tactical enhancements to Increment I's design. Lastly, Increment IV will fill the Air Traffic Control mission. Programmatically, MRRS and GWLR will merge into a single requirement (G/ATOR) as the requirement documents transition from the Op Requirement Document (ORD) format to the Capability Development Document (CDD) format. These funds will allow the accelerated development of Increment II, which is the replacement for the AN/TPQ-46A – currently deployed to OIF . These funds will also allow the program to continue to pursue an accelerated MS B for Increment II and use the FY06 Congressional Plus Up to its full advantage. Reason funds are required: 1. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)2. These funds will allow the accelerated development of G/ATOR Increment II, which is the replacement for the AN/TPQ-46A – currently deployed to OIF . These funds will also allow the program to continue to pursue an accelerated MS B for Increment II Impact if funds are not provided: 1. These developments are crucial to sustain the AN/TPS-59(V)3 until it can be replaced. These development efforts are the primary means of extending the life of the AN/TPS-59(V)3. As the system ages, refreshing the components becomes more critical to maintaining a fully functioning radar system to support the Marine Air Command and Con2. G/ATOR - Current radar performance does not meet operational forces requirements for the MAGTF. Failure to support this initiative delays seizing the moment in taking advantage of technological breakthroughs. The lapse jeopardizes operational force

(U) GATOR: TBD and Anteon Corp. are G/ATOR prime contractors

19.508


19.508FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008

February 2007

G/ATOR: Contractor Technical, Development Engineering/EDM

(U) G/ATOR: These funds will allow the accelerated development of Increment II, which is the replacement for the AN/TPQ-46A – currently deployed to OIF . These funds will also allow the program to continue to pursue an accelerated MS B for Increment II and use the FY06 Congressional Plus Up to its full advantage.

FY 2009


DATE:February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 OPERATIONAL SYS DEV C3099 RADAR SYSTEMSCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


G/ATOR CPIF Contractor TBD 19.508 01/07

Subtotal Product Dev 19.508 Cont ContRemarks:

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value of& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract

Subtotal Support 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Subtotal T&E 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Subtotal Management 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


(Tailor to WBS, or Sys/Item Requirements)


UNCLASSIFIED

Exhibit R-3 Cost AnalysisPROGRAM ELEMENT0206313M Marine Corps Communication Systems





Exhibit R-3, page 26 of 26

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) NAME AND NO.RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational System Development 0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting Arms Systems


4.000

2.000

2.000


Note:


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 47.592 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases 18.150 (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 4.000 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.256 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 69.486


* C2315 Training Devices/Simulators

C1901 Marine Corps Ground Weaponry PIP

UNCLASSIFIED


Total PE Cost


* Funds for Project C2315 were realigned from PE 0206313M starting in FY07.

This PE provides modification to Marine Corps Expeditionary Ground Force Weapon Systems to increase lethality, range, survivability and operational effectiveness. It also provides for the development of AAV7A1 reliability, maintainability, operational and safety modifications, improvements in command and control in the ADMS, and product improvements to the family of LAVsThe AVTB provides facilities and personnel which perform a broad range of testing, repair and technical services to amphibious vehicles.

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing and manufacturing development for upgrades of existingsystems.



UNCLASSIFIEDExhibit R-2, RDTE,N Budget Item Justification

(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 10)



RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development 0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support Arms SystemsFY 2007

FY 2006 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013




(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 6.466 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.032 (U) Amount requested for FY 2007 Supplemental 2.000 (U) UPDATED FY 2007 Budget: 8.434 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Schedule: (U) Technical: (U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total CostPMC BLI #222000 Under $5 Million (Co / Bn Mortars) 1.007 0.000 2.861 3.211 2.222 2.222 3.318 3.418 Cont Cont

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) This project develops joint and Marine Corps unique improvements to infantry weapons technology, improvements for Night Vision Equipment, Rifle Combat Optics, Family of Individual Optics, ThermaWeapons Sight, Small Unit Remote Scouting System (SURSS) and monitors national and international weapons development. NOTE: SURSS has been moved to C2273 in PE 0206313M in FY08 and beyond. Reason funds are required: This funding will be used to supplement current 81mm system development and demonstration articles, as well as testing and evaluation support costs for the 60mm lightweight mortar initiative. Impact if funds are not provided: If not funded, research and development in support of the next generation of Light Weight Mortar System which is crucial to combat operations in OIF will not occur.



Project Cost

Company and Battalion Mortars: This funding will be used to supplement current 81mm system development and demonstration articles, as well as testing and evaluation support costs for the 60mm lightweight mortar initiative.


0.0000.0002.0000.000

0.000FY 2009FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental

0.0002.000FY 2008

0.000



(Exhibit R-2a, page 2 of 10)



RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development 0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support Arms Systems

UNCLASSIFIED



(U) All Ground Weapons and Ground Ammunition Systems: Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Special Operations Command


1Qtr 05 - Present - Picatinny Arsenal, NJ - Test Article Development 1Qtr 07 - Present - NSWC, Dahlgren, VA - Test & Evaluation Management Support.


(U) These programs range from off-the-shelf modifications to developmental items. Modification covers safety, reliability, and technology up-grades to meet Marine Corps requirements.




DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems DevelopmentCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Company/Battalion Mortar (81mm)WR Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 1.000 3Q07

Subtotal Product Dev 1.000Remarks:


Company/Battalion Mortar 0.000 Subtotal Support 0.000Remarks:


Company/Battalion Mortar (60mm)WR NSWC, Dahlgren, VA 1.000 3Q07 Subtotal T&E 1.000Remarks:


Subtotal Management 0.000Remarks:

Total Cost 2.000

UNCLASSIFIED

C1901 Marine Corps Ground Weaponry PIP0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support Arms Systems




DATE:February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME


FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost

0.662 1.161 1.007 1.007 1.007 0.507 0.522 0.538 Cont Cont2.000 Cont Cont

(U) PMC, BLI 222000, Company and Battalion Mortars 1.007 0.000 2.861 3.211 2.222 2.222 3.318 3.418 0.000 18.259

(APPN, BLI #, NOMEN)(U) RDT&E,N, C1901, Company and Battalion Mortars

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development

(U) RDT&E,N, C1901, Co. & Batt. Mortars (Supplemental)

UNCLASSIFIED

Exhibit R-4-4a Project Schedule/Detail

MORTARS

Program Funding Summary

0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support Arms Systems


UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-4/4a, Schedule Profile/Detail(Exhibit R-4/4a, page 5 of 10)

DATE:February 2007


C1901 Marine Corps Ground Weaponry PIPRDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Systems Development

UNCLASSIFIED


0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Support Arms Systems

MORTARS FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Pre Milestone A Activities 2Q

Business Case Analysis 2Q

Technology Research and Analysis 1Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 2Q

Milestone A/B

Milestone C

Contract Award 60mm/81mm Systems 1Q

LRIP 2Q

Evaluation 2Q

Modifications 3Q

Fielding 3Q

Deliveries 3Q

IOC 4Q

FOC 1Q


UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-4/4a, Schedule Profile/Detail(Exhibit R-4/4a, page 6 of 10)


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMEC2315 Training Devices/Simulators




(U) Total $

0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting Arms


Project Cost

FY 2006

RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Development

Reason funds are required: There is no deployable foreign language training system currently available that teaches only those communication skills, competencies, and background that are necessary to complete real-world missions and tasks. Foreign language training at schoolhouses such as the Defense language Institute can be very expensive due to travel and per diem and requires Marines to be away from their units for long periods of time. Additionally, schoolhouse based training has limited availability and tends to focus on written formal language training, not face-to-face communication encountered in towns, villages, hamlets, and encampments. Further, it is not focused on the communication demands of particular missions, so trainees expend effort on learning material that is not of immediate or practical use to them. The training does not provide an understanding of culture and gestures, which are critical to establishing cooperative relationships with indigenous people. Language training tools are required that utilize advance speech recognition and learner modeling technologies to support face-to-face conversation while providing learners with real-time feedback in geo specific real world settings. This survival language and cultural training technology integrated with tactical decision

0.000

(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009

0.000 2.000

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) Training simulators supported by this program element include Automated Language Training System. Automated Language Training System is a PC based interactive scenario-oriented language and culture training system that is designed to provide warfighters survival language and culture skills as well as tactical decision making skills for their area of responsibility. The objective of the Automated Language Training System is to provide a deployable survival foreign language and culture training capability through computer based interactive training. Marines will learn survival foreign language and culture skills by interacting with animated characters representing local people in a simulated mission scenario. The simulation environment will be rendered using a Government designated gaming engine. Geo specific terrain will be used to produce a three dimensional environment suitable for mission rehearsal. The survival language and culture training module will be integrated with this simulation environment to provide tactical decision making training using the appropriate survival language and culture skills to achieve a truly ‘real world’ mission rehearsal capability.

NOTE: FY 05 and FY06 Funding is in PE 0206313M.

2.000 0.000

Automated Language Training System: This FY07 Supplemental funds provides for technology development required to produce survival foreign language and culture training modules relevant to Marine Corps operational areas of responsibility. It also provides for technology development necessary to integrate these survival foreign language and culture training modules with a simulation environment that provides tactical decision making training using geo-specific terrain. A prototype of these technologies will be produced that provides a PC based training system that provides survival language and culture training, tactical decision making training and mission rehearsal capability using geo-specific simulation environments.

0.000

0.0000.000





APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMEC2315 Training Devices/Simulators0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting ArmsRDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Development

UNCLASSIFIED


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 7.341 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: 2.000 (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments

(U) FY 2008 NAVCOMPT Budget: 9.341 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Schedule: (U) Technical:



RDT&E, N PE 26313M C2315 8.444 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.444

PMC BLI #653200 Training Devices Simulators 116.203 226.991 30.871 56.565 18.499 19.266 20.233 20.973 Cont Cont


(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: (U) Automated Language Training Upgrade - Cost plus Fixed Fee contract (CPFF) using Science & Technology (S&T) Broad Agency Anouncement (BAA).

(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:Not Applicable for any programs with Training Devices/Simulators, C2315.





DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys DevelopmentCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Product Dev -

Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


SW Dev - Survival Foreign Language and Culture Training Modules CPFF* BAA 1.200 Jan-07SW Dev - Integration with Simulation Environment CPFF* BAA 0.700 Jan-07 Subtotal S/W Dev 0.000 0.000 1.900 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


T & E - Cont ContCont Cont

Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Program Support - WR MCSC, PM TRASYS Orlando 0.100 Jan-07 Cont Cont Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


UNCLASSIFIED

C2315 Training Devices/Simulators0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting Arms




DATE:February 2007


RDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Development- C2315 Training Devices/Simulators

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Compl Total Cost

0.000 2.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont(U) PMC BLI 653200 Training Dev/Sim 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

Automated Language Training System FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Contract Award - Survival Foreign Language and Culture Training Modules 2Q

Contract Award - Integration with Simulation Environment 2Q

Program Support 2-4Q

Program Funding Summary(APPN, BLI #, NOMEN)

(U) RDT&E,N (RMT) PE 26623M C2315

UNCLASSIFIED


0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting ArmsSystems

FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13FY07 FY0 FY FY

RMT Contract Award (w/Options)

Program Support

Automated Language Training System PROGRAM SCHEDULE




APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) NAME AND NO.RDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational System Development 0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services Support


15.566

14.851

0.715


Note:


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 17.524 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) Supplemental 15.566 (U) Minor Affordability Adjustment -0.068 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 33.022



This PE provides improvements in all areas of Combat Service Support Engineering Equipment to increase lethality, range, survivability and operational effectiveness. The program includes joint evaluations and

Total PE Cost

C2316 Engineering Equipment

C0201 Logistical Vehicle Sys Replacement (LVSR)

Funds to provide for the operational systems development of Marine Corps equipment needed for the supply, maintenance, engineer, motor transport, and service support of operating forces.

UNCLASSIFIED




UNCLASSIFIED(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 7)

DATE: February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev C2316 Combat Services Support Engineering Equipment


14.851




(U) Total $

MRAP vehicles provide significantly higher personnel survivability rates than non-MRAP vehicles from IED attacks. MRAP vehicles provide EOD and Engineer Units with improved survivability against IEDs and provide ballistic and mine protection for the crew. Three MRAP Vehicle Categories include Cat I- 6 passenger with Mission Profile Urban and Command and Control Capability; Cat II- 10 passenger with Mission Profile Convoy Lead, EOD, Ambulance, Troop Carrier and Cat III- 12 passenger with Mission Profile EOD Route Clearance.


0.000

0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services Spt

2.800

UNCLASSIFIED


A. This project includes improvements in all areas of Combat Service Support Engineering Equipment. This will sustain the technological currency of the M1A1 Main Battle Tank and the M88A2 Recovery Vehicle while concurrently addressing equipment deficiencies, obsolesced components, and/or opportunities to reduce total ownership costs. The program includes joint evaluations and development of modifications, component enhancements and advanced subsystems involving automotive, fire control, survivability and combat identification. The Joint Assault Bridge (JAB), formerly Expeditionary Assault Bridge (EAB) is a tracked engineer vehicle that provides the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) with a survivable, deployable and sustainable 18.3 meter wet/dry gap crossing capability. The JAB is comprised of an M1A1 chassis, a modified BR90 bridge launcher, an Embedded Diagnostics System, and Cameras to aid crew visibility. The JAB will provide crew protection and vehicle survivability while having the speed and mobility to keep pace with the maneuver force.



Project Cost

RDT&E Articles Qty

s a e t e p a y sou ce o ost e casua t es t eate . e cu e t g ob ty u t w ee ed Ve c e ( WV) a y was ot a u actu ed as a a o ed ve c e a d as eac ed ts capac ty ca y g textra weight of armoring being applied. MRAP vehicles provide significantly higher personnel survivability rates than non-MRAP vehicles from IED attacks. MRAP vehicles provide EOD and Engineer Units with improved survivability against IEDs and provide ballistic and mine protection for the crew. Three MRAP Vehicle Categories include Cat I- 6 passenger with Mission Profile Urban and Command and Control Capability; Cat II- 10 passenger with Mission Profile Convoy Lead, EOD, Ambulance, Troop Carrier and Cat III- 12 passenger with Mission Profile EOD Route Clearance. Reason funds are required: ABV/JAB-Equipment and MRAP testing is required to support on-going combat operations in support of OIF and fund combat operations, force protection and replacement of equipment items.

M1A1-These funds are required to design, develop, and test the loader’s remote weapon station in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Currently, the loader must come out of the hatch to fire the 7.62

The Assault Breacher Vehicle (ABV) is a full tracked armored combat engineer vehicle specifically designed for conducting in-stride and deliberate breaching of mine fields and complex obstacles. Based on an M1A1 Main Battle Tank chassis, it provides crew protection and vehicle survivability while having the speed and mobility to keep pace with the maneuver force.

FY 2008 FY 2009

ABV: Complete the integretation of critical combat components on the ABV. Activities include: improving the range and reliability of the Remote Control System to allow unmanned operations to be performed in high threat environments, improve the performance of the Integrated Vision System to provide full vision for crew memembers conducting assured mobility operations in all weather conditions, and addtional improvements to the reliability of key breaching systems in order to increase the systems's operational availability which will lead to completing Operational Test and Evaluation.

0.000 14.851 0.000

12.051FY 2006 FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008 FY 2009



DATE: February 2007

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev C2316 Combat Services Support Engineering Equipment0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services Spt

UNCLASSIFIED


(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY:FY 2007

(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 2.028 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional/OSD Program Reductions (U) Congressional Rescissions (U) Congressional Increases (U) Reprogrammings (U) FY07 Supplemental 14.851 (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.008 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 16.871 CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (U) Funding: See above. (U) Schedule: Not Applicable. (U) Technical: Not Applicable.


63.637 6.888 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 70.525 (U) PMC (BLI 652000) MRAPS 0.000 568.138 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont Cont

(U) Related RDT&E: (U) PE 0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat Supporting Arms Systems (U) PE 0603640M Marine Corps Advanced Technology Demonstration(U) PE 0604804A Logistics and Engineering Equip/Engr Development(U) PE 0206313M Marine Corps Communications


(U) Assault Breacher Vehicle (ABV): complete integration of critical combat components on the ABV. Activities include: improving the range and reliability of the Remote Control System to allow unmanned operations to be performed in high threat environments, improve the performance of the Integrated Vision System to provide full vision for crew members conducting assured mobility operations in all weather conditions, and additional improvements to the reliability of key breaching systems in order to increase the system's operational availability.

MRAP Testing - Sole source IDIQ contract to Force Protection Industries USMC Cat II: Up to 200 Vehicles (JERRVs)/ USMC Cat III: Up to 80 vehicles (Buffalo) Expedites providing vehicles to the field while competition is ongoing. Concurrently issue competitive RFP for all Cat I and remaining Cat II vehicles; Abbreviated source selection; Award multiple IDIQ contracts for initial delivery of 2 vehicles of each category for test; Conduct limited test (live fire, mobility, limited user evaluation); Award remaining Cat I and II vehicles under the IDIQs, based on Best performance in testing; Capability to meet production/delivery schedule within available funding.

JAB/ABV - BAE Land Systems, New Castle, United KingdomJAB/ABV - Anniston Army Depot, Anniston, Alabama(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:

(U) PMC Line (BLI 652000)EOD Sys- ABV



DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis December 2006APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev 0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services SptCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:

Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Cont Cont Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


ABV - Test Support MIPR Various 2.800 0.000 2.8000.000 0.000

Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 2.800 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


Test Article Procurement IDIQ TBD, MCSC, Quantico 0.000 0.000 6.477 4Q/07 Cont Cont TBDSystem Testing IDIQ TBD, MCSC, Quantico 0.000 0.000 5.574 4Q/07 Cont Cont TBD

Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 12.051 0.000 0.000 Cont ContRemarks:


UNCLASSIFIED

C2316 Combat Services Support Engineering Equip




APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services Support C0201 Logistical Vehicle Sys Replacement (LVSR)





(U) Total $


0.715

FY 2008

0.000 0.000

FRC: Prototype Development.

FRC: Developmental Test and Evaluation

0.000 0.000

0.000

0.365FY 2009

0.000FY 2006

10.000

FY 2009FY 2007 Supplemental FY 2008

UNCLASSIFIED

The Flatrack Refueling Capability (FRC) program will replace the M970 Semi-Trailer refueling in both the Force Service Support Group (FSSG) and the Marine Air Wings (MAWs) for ground refueling missions. Reason funds are required: Additional funds in the


Project Cost

FY 20060.000 0.350 0.000




APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA-7 Operational Sys Dev 0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services Support C0201 Logistical Vehicle Sys Replacement (LVSR)

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY: FY 2007 (U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 7.652 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Congressional Adds (U) Reprogrammings (U) SBIR/STTR Transfer (U) Minor Affordability Adjustments -0.030 (U) FY07 Supplemental 0.715 (U) FY 2007 Budget: 8.337


(U) Schedule: N/A (U) Technical: N/A

Line Item No & Name FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY20130.000 7.151 0.016 12.049 21.777 13.200 0.000 0.00 Cont Cont

31.615 39.780 63.096 217.444 179.230 161.288 130.100 64.054 Cont Cont

(U) Related RDT&E: (U) PE 0206623M Marine Corps Ground Combat Supporting Arms Systems (U) PE 0603640M Marine Corps Advanced Technology Demonstration (U) PE 0604804A Logistics and Engineering Equip/Engr Development (U) PE 0206313M Marine Corps Communications

(U) PMC Line (BLI# 509300) LVSR

(U) Funding change represents request for Supplemental for additional testing for the FRC.

(U) PMC Line (BLI# 509300) FlatRack

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The Flatrack Refueling Capability (FRC) program will consist of two separate phases. During the first phase, the System Development and Demonstration (SD&D) phase, one contract will be awarded to procure prototypes for deve(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:



DATE:Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis February 2007APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 7 Operational Sys Dev 0206624M Marine Corps Combat Services SptCost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target


Development Test MIPR Aberdeen Test Center 0.000 0.000 0.365 4Q/07 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.365Prototype Development MIPR TACOM, Warren, MI 0.000 0.000 0.350 4Q/07 0.000 0.350

0.000 0.000

Subtotal Product Dev 0.000 0.000 0.715 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.715Remarks:Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Target

Method Activity & PY s FY 06 Award FY 07 Award FY 08 Award FY 09 Award Cost to Total Value ofContract

Subtotal Developmental Cost 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Remarks:


Subtotal Engineer & Tech Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Remarks:


Subtotal Operational Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Remarks:


Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Remarks:

Total Cost 0.000 0.000 0.715 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.715

UNCLASSIFIED

C0201 Logistical Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR)





APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURERESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0305207N, Manned Reconnaissance System


Total PE Cost 65.086 XXXX SABER FOCUS 65.086



SABER FOCUS: This project implements specific clandesitne technologies to improve current operational effects and provide recommendations on future acquisition and Tactics, Techniques and Procedures, (TTPs) decisions inaccordance with the Congressional directive. Because of an increased intelligence gap furthered by the reduction of forces in specific terrorists areas of operations, Congress determined a need to be able tocollect information and locate targets of interest. Technologies currently exist to detect and track advanced targets to include communications between these targets of interest that would precisely locate themand enable prosecution. SABER FOCUS was formed as a joint/inter-agency project to incorporate multi-intelligence fusion efforts/state of the art technology, specific intelligence tradecraft, innovative TTPs, andassess possible applications in other areas of responsibility.

UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 3)


APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 0305207N, Manned Reconnaissance Systems XXXX





UNCLASSIFIED

This project implements specific clandestine technologies to improve current operaitonal effects and provide recommendations on future acquisition and Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) decisions in accordance with the Congressional directive. Because of an increased intelligence gap furthered by the reduction of forces in specific terrorists areas of operatons, Congress determined a need to be able to collect information and locate targets of interest. Technologies currectly exist to detect and track advanced targets to include communications between these targets of interest that would precisely locate them and enable prosectuion. SABER FOCUS was formed as a joint/inter-agency project to incorporate multi-intelligence fusion efforts/state of the art technology, specific intelligence tradecraft, innovative TTPs, and assess possible applications in other areas of responsibillity.

65.086


Project Cost


This project implements specific clandestine technologies to improve current operaitonal effects and provide recommendations on future acquisition and Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) decisions in accordance with Congressional directive.

65.086



0.000





APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAMERDT&E, N /BA 0305207N, Manned Reconnaissance Systems XXXX

UNCLASSIFIED


(U) FY 2007 President's Budget: 0 (U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: (U) Title IX Appropriations (U) FY07 Supplemental 65.086


(U) Schedule: Not Applicable (U) Technical: Not Applicable



(U) Related RDT&E: 0305207N Predator BQM-9 Hunter 39.4

N/A(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:


(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: N/A





National Defense Sealift Fund

Date:

Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification SheetAppropriation / Budget Activity/Serial No: National Defense Sealift Fund (NDSF) (AC #80) P-1 Item Nomenclature: Budget Activity: Ready Reserve Force (RRF) (NDSF BA 5)

Budget Line Item: Ready Reserve Force (RRF) (NDSF BLI 0500)

Program Elements: BLI 05000 Code: Other Related Program Elements:


Proc QtyGross Cost

Less PY Adv Proc

Plus CY Adv Proc

Net Proc (P-1) 5.0

Initial Spares

Total Proc Cost 5.0

Flyaway U/C

Wpn Sys Proc U/C

February 2007

Narrative DescriptionFunds will provide critical maintenance and repair to Ready Reserve Force (RRF) ships resulting from their high use in OIF sealift operations.

(Dollars in Thousands)FY 2007 Baseline FY 2007 FY 2007 FY2007 Budget Title IX Supplemental Total $213.6 $0.0 $5.0 $218.6

Reason funds are requiredThe Ready Reserve Force (RRF) provides combatant commanders critical surge sealift support. Priority ships are kept in a Reduced Operating Status (ROS-5) at various pier locations with a 10-person crew on-board. Ships are able to get underway within 5 days of activation. The RRF program has provided reliable service to OIF beginning in FY03. With OIF, the operational tempo of the RRF program has changed dramatically, from a base of 400 operating days annually, to 2,500-5,000 annual operating days. During lengthy operational periods, RRF vessels incur much greater wear and tear on equipment, machinery and systems than when ships are in their typical ROS condition. The resulting higher level of maintenance costs are not reflected in the RRF budget request nor in operating per diem. This supplemental provides maintenance and repair for 22 RRF ships that provided OIF with over 3,600 days of operational support.

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND NDSF Exhibit P-5 SEALIFT COST ANALYSIS

A. DATE: B. APPROPRIATION: C. ITEM NOMENCLATURE

December 2006 National Defense Sealift Fund (NDSF) (AC #80) Budget Activity: Ready Reserve Force (RRF) (NDSF BA 5) BA-5

Budget Line Item: Ready Reserve Force (RRF) (NDSF BLI 0500) BLI 050000

IDENT TOTAL COST IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ELEMENT OF COST CODE FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

COST TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALCODE RRF COST CATEGORY QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST QTY COST

(1) (2) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (17) (18) (17) (18)

BLI #0500 Maintenance & Repair, activations 5,000

BLI #0500 ROS Crews/SM fees

BLI #0500 Outporting

BLI #0500 Logistics

BLI #0500 NDRF/Facilities & Security

BLI #0500 SDDC/USTC enhancements of RRFT-1 DisposalCapacity development alternativesTanker Contingency contract

BLI #0500 Shipping Contingency contract

BLI #0500

Total, Maintenance & Ops program 5,000

TOTAL, RRF (NDSF BA 5 BLI 0500) 5,000

February 2007


February 2007

Fiscal Year (FY) 2007

BUDGET ESTIMATES

FY 2007 Program

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR SUPPLEMENTAL

JUSTIFICATION DATASubmitted to Congress

Blank Page

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY2007 Military Construction, Global War on Terror Supplemental

Table of Contents

Executive Overview i C-1 Project Listing iii Summary of Requested Projects v DD Form 1391 Exhibits 1

Blank Page


Executive Overview

The Global War on Terror (GWOT) MILCON projects referenced herein provide basic and essential utility systems in direct support of the United States' localized mission requirements in the war against terror. These projects provide fundamental infrastructure for force and operational sustainment required for mission effectiveness. The mission impact and basic project scopes are outlined below. Central Command Projects - The mission of the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) is to: detect, disrupt, and ultimately defeat transnational terrorist groups operating in the region and deny safe havens, external support, and material assistance for terrorist activity. They are also charged to provide host nations a stable and secure environment where all people have the freedom of choice. Camp Lemonier, Djibouti serves as CJTF-HOA's expeditionary headquarters and base camp. Camp Lemonier, Djibouti requires an investment in basic infrastructure to make use of recently leased property. The enclosed projects are required to allow the United States forces to observe minimum Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) setback requirements for personnel berthing and administration facilities. Additionally, these projects provide basic life support measures and the scope of each project has been refined to provide only essential, sustainable infrastructure. The designed outcome is to minimize permanent infrastructure, but still provide the basic life support services required for deployed personnel. Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay (JTF-GTMO) Project - This project provides a new Generator Facility to replace an aged, existing facility. The included scope will provide vital utility support for the Operation Enduring Freedom JTF detainee operation. Existing facilities cannot reliably support the operation as required. Not only will this new facility better support the new generators being purchased in the Other Procurement Navy (OPN) portion of the Supplemental, but the power system is a critical force protection node and the existing facility has significant AT/FP and destructive weather issues that this project will resolve. OPN costs included in previous GWOT supplemental for Generators and additional line items for OPN are accounted for in this supplemental. The attached Marine Corps Military Construction projects support the Global War on Terror by supporting the approved 4,000 end strength increase for infantry battalions. An additional Regimental Combat Team (RCT) provides the increased end strength necessary for the Marine Corps. The low density, high

i


demand (LD/HD) capabilities that are consistently requested for Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) employment are also those capabilities that the joint force will need to support future GWOT requirements in other combatant command Area of Operational Responsibility (AORs). For the Marine Corps, these projects will increase critical intelligence, reconnaissance, military police, engineer, helicopter, ground mobility, and infantry capacities. This is viewed as a strategic initiative since OPTEMPO has a direct impact on institutional force (personnel and equipment) readiness. Many of the force sourcing shortfalls the Marine Corps has had to consistently identify for OIF rotations are the result of an unbalanced Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) structure across the three active duty Marine Expeditionary Forces (MEFs). These projects will not only help mitigate current Operation Tempo (OPTEMPO) shortfalls and position the Marine Corps to better meet future requirements, but it will help move the Marine Corps towards a more balanced MAGTF structure.

ii

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFY2007 Military Construction, Global War on Terror Supplemental

($ Thousands)

Auth forAuth Approp Appt TOA

State/Component/Installation Amount Amount Amount Amount Page No Project Name

Marine Corps

MCB Camp LeJeune NC Mess Hall 16,100 16,100 16,100 16,100 1 3/9 Maintenance/Operations Complex 41,490 41,490 41,490 41,490 5 Regimental Headquarters Addition 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 9 MP Company Operations Complex 5,800 5,800 5,800 5,800 13 Truck Company Maint/Ops Complex 9,150 9,150 9,150 9,150 17 EOD Building FC292 Addition 2,570 2,570 2,570 2,570 21 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Hadnot Point 40,560 40,560 40,560 40,560 21

Total Camp LeJeune 124,270 124,270 124,270 124,270

Navy

Naval Station Guantanamo Bay Diesel Generator Facility 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 29

Total Naval Station Guantanamo Bay 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000

Camp Lemonier Djibouti Electric Power Plant 17,990 17,990 17,990 17,990 33 Water Production 18,310 18,310 18,310 18,310 37 Water Storage 5,630 5,630 5,630 5,630 41 Wastewater Treatment 19,700 19,700 19,700 19,700 45

Total Camp Lemonier Djibouti 61,630 61,630 61,630 61,630

Worldwide Planning and Design 204,600 204,600 204,600 204,600 49

iii

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2007 Military Construction, Global War on Terror Supplemental

Blank Page

iv

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY2007 Military Construction,obal War on Terror Supplemental

Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1213 Messhall, Hadnot Point Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $16,100 Description/Justification: This project constructs a centrally located messhall with a fast food area, for the 2nd Battalion 9th Marines, and other Marines and Sailors located in Hadnot Point. Increases to Camp Lejeune’s end-strength to meet the Commandant's initiative for the Global War on Terrorism has forced Camp Lejeune to look at new areas for operational facilities and barracks. Building in these new areas necessitates the need for dining facilities to satisfy the feeding requirements of the Marines working in this area. Existing dining facilities in Hadnot Point were designed to feed 7,096 personnel. End strength increases will at Hadnot Point increase the requirement to 11,544 personnel and create a 4,448 shortfall. Impact if not provided: The inability to economically and efficiently feed the projected increase in Marine Corps personnel in the existing dining facilities will severely jeopardize and restrict operational capabilities to successfully accomplish the mission. Dining facilities for Marines in the Hadnot Point area will not be able to adequately support this essential quality of life requirement.

v


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1220, 3/9 Maintenance/Ops Complex Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $41,490 Description/Justification: Current plans call for 3rd Battalion, 9th Marines (3/9) to be integrated as an additional infantry battalion under the operational control of the 2nd Marine Division Regimental commands. The addition of 3/9 will allow the Marine Corps to more effectively pursue the Global War on Terror. This project will construct operations and maintenance facilities for the stand-up of (3/9). The facilities will include a battalion headquarters, an armory, motor transport maintenance facility, and an Indoor Simulated Marksmanship Trainer (ISMT). Impact if not provided: Currently there are no existing facilities onboard MCB Camp Lejeune to provide 3/9 with adequate operations and maintenance facilities. If this project is not provided, 3/9 will be unable to maintain and repair its assigned equipment and unit readiness will be vastly decreased.

vi


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1221, Additions to Regimental Headquarters Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $8,600 Description/Justification: This project provides additional administrative space to the Regimental Headquarters elements at MCB Camp Lejeune for an additional 4 officers and 38 enlisted personnel being added to the 2nd, 6th, 8th, and 10th Marine Regiments, 2nd Marine Division. Impact if not provided: The existing facilities for the 2nd, 6th, 8th, and 10th Marine Regiments are inadequately sized and will not support the additional personnel required to support the Commandant’s end-strength increase initiative to support the Global War on Terror.

vii


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1222, MP Company Operations Complex Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $5,800 Description/Justification: This project will provide Company Headquarters, Supply, Armory and Vehicle Maintenance facilities for the MP Company. Military construction is required to support the Commandant's end-strength increase initiative recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism. MCB Camp Lejeune does not have facilities to support the additional population and equipment increases for MP Company. Impact if not provided: Currently there are no existing facilities onboard MCB Camp Lejeune that will provide the MP Company with adequate operations and maintenance facilities. If this project is not provided, the MP Company will be unable to maintain and repair its assigned equipment and unit readiness will be vastly decreased.

viii


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1223, Truck Company Maintenance/Operations Complex Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $9,150 Description/Justification: Current plans call for 3/9 to be integrated as an additional infantry battalion under the operational control of the 2nd Marine Division Regimental commands. The addition of 3/9 will allow the Marine Corps to more effectively pursue the Global War on Terror. The addition of 3/9 to the 2nd Marine Division will require the headquarters Motor T element of 2nd Marine Division to increase in size to accommodate the new battalion. This project will construct a consolidated motor transport complex for the Headquarters Battalion, 2nd Marine Division. The facilities will include a battalion headquarters, an armory, motor transport maintenance and operations facility, company headquarters, weapons storage, and weapons cleaning facilities. Impact if not provided: Currently the existing facilities onboard MCB Camp Lejeune have insufficient space to support the additional truck company required for the stand-up of 3/9. If this project is not provided, 2nd Marine Division will be unable to fully support the Motor T assets from 3/9 and unit readiness will be decreased.

ix

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Military Construction, Global War on Terror Supplemental

Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1224, EOD Addition, FC 292 Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $2,570 Description/Justification: Current plans call for 3/9 to be integrated as an additional infantry battalion under the operational control of the 2nd Marine Division Regimental commands. The addition of 3/9 will allow the Marine Corps to more effectively pursue the Global War on Terror. The addition of 3/9 will include and increase in EOD personnel and equipment. This project will construct an addition to building FC292, the existing EOD facility to accommodate the additional personnel and equipment. Impact if not provided: Currently the existing facilities onboard MCB Camp Lejeune have insufficient space to support the additional EOD personnel equipment required for the stand-up of 3/9. If this project is not provided the 3rd Battalion, 9th Marines will be unable to fulfill its EOD mission in support of the Global War on Terror and overall unit readiness will suffer.

x


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: Marine Corps Category: MCN Project: P-1225, 3/9 Bachelor Enlisted

Quarters, Hadnot Point Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amount ($000): $40,560 Description/Justification: This project provides 600 additional billeting spaces to support the Commandant’s initiative to increase end-strength to support the Marine Corps’ ever-increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism. Impact if not provided: MCB Camp Lejeune's existing barracks inventory will not support the standup of an additional infantry battalion (3/9). Even without the additional infantry battalion there already exists a billeting deficiency of 4,252 manspaces in the Hadnot Point area, which is predominantly occupied by the 2D Marine Division. Marines are currently being over billeted in otherwise adequate barracks causing overcrowded conditions.

xi

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY2007 Military Construction,lobal War on Terror Supplemental

Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: NAVY Category: MCN Project: P-333G New Power Plant Location: NAVSTA Guantanamo Bay, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Amount ($000): 22,000 Description/Justification: Construct a new power plant (PP5) on the bluff (Corinaso Point) above the existing power plant (PP4) to accommodate five diesel generators, and provide space and expansion capability to accommodate additional diesel generators. The modular, weather-proof building will include a gantry crane for efficient equipment servicing. The new power generators will be connected to the distribution system and will bypass the buss limitation in PP4. New switchgear will be installed and the existing PP4 SF-6 switches and step-up transformers T1-T2 will be utilized. Construct a road way to the new Power Plant PP-5 on Corinaso Point with security fencing and security lighting. Install POL/lube lines for diesel distribution for generators and air compressor with supporting facilities required to operate the Power Plant. Impact if not provided: The whole of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is self sustaining and totally isolated from the continental United States. Locally, the station produces its own electricity and water. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay is strategically located on the Eastern end of the island of Cuba. Primary missions assigned to the base include support for air operations related to logistical functions of the U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, Joint Task Force and other U. S. Military and Government contingency operations in the Caribbean. A primary goal of this mission is to maintain a forward presence near the Windward Passage to the Caribbean for the conduct of counter-drug operations. Guantanamo also has a contingency for migrant operations. If the station doesn’t upgrade the electrical grid, we will incur electrical outages that will also impact water supply, sewage, environmental controls and prevent fueling local vehicles. This would potentially have drastic affects on all operations at Guantanamo Bay. The increased fuel cost and escalation of fuel expected in the future requires conservation measures. Installing new, high energy efficient generators and upgrading the power grid will maximize fuel usage and enable the Government to more efficiently manage utility costs.

xii


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: NAVY Category: MCN Project: P-902G Electrical Power Plant Location: Camp Lemonier, Djibouti Amount ($000): 17,990 Description/Justification: The current Prime Power plant produces ~6 MW of reliable power. The estimated near term requirement is 12 MW, this includes estimated demand, high ambient temperature operations, and redundancy for maintenance. This project provides reliable electrical power through the construction of a 6 MW electrical power plant and associated switchgear and distribution system. Commercial utility service is not feasible due to expensive rates and unreliable service. Impact if not provided: Impacts are summarized in the following bullets:

• By next summer, the electrical load of current projects will exceed production capacity by 6MW.

• Base Operations and support of downrange operations will be disrupted

by outages.

• Further development of $30M/yr expansion area will not be possible.

xiii

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY2007 Military Construction, Global War on Terror Suplemental

Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: NAVY Category: MCN Project: P-903G Water Production Facility Location: Camp Lemonier, Djibouti Amount ($000): 18,310 Description/Justification: Provide a water production facility comprised of two 200K gal/day Reverse Osmosis cells and associated distribution systems that will produce potable water that meets USEPA drinking water standards for the personnel currently located at the camp. Water will be sourced from beach wells. The water discharge pipe is included in scope of P-913. Impact if not provided: Impacts are summarized in the following bullets:

• Personnel exposed to substandard water quality and potential waterborne diseases from water that does not meet USEPA standards.

• Imported bottled water and ice costs will continue to be incurred in excess

of $2M/year. • Further development of $30M/yr expansion area will not be possible.

xiv


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: NAVY Category: MCN Project: P-904G Water Storage Location: Camp Lemonier, Djibouti Amount ($000): 5,630 Description/Justification: Construct a 500K gallon capacity steel water tank with associated perimeter fencing, pumps, pipes, and electrical support. Impact if not provided: Impacts are summarized in the following bullets:

• Personnel will be exposed to substandard water quality and potential waterborne diseases from water that does not meet USEPA standards.

• Fire hazard risk to camp personnel will remain at an unacceptable level. • Imported bottled water and ice costs will continue to be incurred in excess

of $2M/year. • Further development of $30M/yr expansion area will not be possible.

xv


Summary of Military Construction Projects Component: NAVY Category: MCN Project: P-913G Waste Water Treatment Facility Location: Camp Lemonier, Djibouti Amount ($000): 19,700 Description/Justification: Construct a biological wastewater treatment plant capable of treating 250K gal/day through a rotating biological contactor process. The project includes lift stations, pressurized piping, gravity collection piping, and an outfall pipe for direct discharge to the ocean. The project also includes the scope to demolish the existing treatment facility. Impact if not provided: Impacts are summarized in the following bullets:

• Unable to meet mission for surge requirement. • The current plant's effluent discharge will remain a health & safety hazard

and restrict required camp expansion. • Further development of $30M/yr expansion area will not be possible.

xvi

Submitted to Congress

January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 11391

10. Description of Proposed Construction:

9. COST ESTIMATES

Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)

MESSHALL, HADNOT POINT (31,301 SF)

MESSHALL (30,979 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (323

SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT

TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE

PROTECTION

SUPPORTING FACILITIES

SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES

ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

MECHANICAL UTILITIES

PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL

DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST

TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED

TOTAL REQUEST

EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER

APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,908

2,878

30

2,901.7

7,102.84

9,930

(8,350)

(210)

(1,010)

(240)

(70)

(50)

4,000

(260)

(570)

(660)

(1,730)

(730)

(50)

13,930

700

14,630

830

15,460

560

16,020

16,100

(1,328)

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date

4. Project Title

5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number

1. Component

8. Project Cost ($000)

04 JAN 2007

16,1000216496M 72210

MESSHALL, HADNOT POINT

NAVY 2007FY

P1213

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE

CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:

The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE

CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Construct a single story reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) EnlistedDining Facility, with reinforced concrete foundation and floors, structural

steel framing and standing seam metal roof. Dining Facility shall also

include a drive-up window for food distribution and an enclosed

waiting/check-in area. Interior finishes to be carpeting/vinyl composition


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 21391C

Recent increases to Camp Lejeune structure (2/9 and AT Bn) and meeting the

Commandant's 2x0 standard for BEQ's, have forced Camp lejeune to look at

new areas for operational facilities and barracks. Building in these new

areas necessitates the need for dining facilities to satisfy the feeding

requirements of the Marines working in this area. Existing dining

facilities in Hadnot Point were designed to feed 7,096 pn. Current

population has increased the requirement for Hadnot Point to 11,544 pn, a

shortfall of 4,448 pn.

Adequate enlisted dining facility for Marines and Sailors assigned to the

ME area of Hadnot Point. Provide a modernized consolidated messing

facility to accommodate the organizational structure of Marine Corps and

Navy personnel.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a centrally located messhall with a fast food area,

for the 2D Battalion 9th Marines, Anti-Terrorism Battalion, and other

Marines and Sailors located in the ME area of Hadnot Point.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

16,1000216496M 72210


NAVY 2007FY

P1213




11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,908

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

tile, suspended acoustical/painted wallboard ceilings. Built-In equipment

includes CATV and dining room outlets and a loading dock leveler. Project

also includes Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force

Protection features. Sustainable features will be included in the design,

development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive

Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Special foundation

features include a pile foundation. Electrical systems include fire alarms,

exterior site and building lighting, back-up generator, and information

systems. Electrical utilities include site and building utility

connections (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, Local

Area Network (LAN), and Cable Television (CATV)). Mechanical systems

include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and air

conditioning. Paving and site improvements include pavement striping,

directional signage, concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters, paved and

lighted parking, earthwork, grading and landscaping. Construction will

include site features to meet Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection minimum

standards.


January 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract Design Build

(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost

(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed

Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006

12. Supplemental Data:

Escalating maintenance costs combined with the inability to handle

projected personnel increase requirements in the existing dining

facilities, will severely jeopardize and restrict operational capabilities

to successfully accomplish the mission. Further building deterioration and

quality of life degradation will result and prevail.


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

16,1000216496M 72210


NAVY 2007FY

P1213




Collateral Equipment

NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

1,307

21

B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from

other appropriations:

Equipment

Nomenclature

JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:

The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and

Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this

project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral

(D) Percent completed as of

(C) Date design completed

(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete

2. Basis:

(A) Standard or Definitive Design

(B) Where design was previously used

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

5. Construction start:

4. Contract award:

6. Construction complete:

A. Estimated Design Data:

1. Status:

(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started

No

$640

$540

$100

01/2008

09/2007

07/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$600

$40

(E) Percent completed as of

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):

(A) Production of plans and specifications

(B) All other design costs

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp

or Requested Cost ($000)

2005 R&M Conducted ($000):2006 R&M Conducted ($000):

C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

16,1000216496M 72210


NAVY 2007FY

P1213




Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other

components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is

based on Navy requirements.

W. L. Brant (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form


9. COST ESTIMATES


3/9 MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX

(92,533 SF)

BATTALION HQ BLDG (26,867 SF)

GENERAL SUPPLY WHSE (15,769

SF)

ELEC COMM MAINT SHOP (6,415

SF)

MOTOR TRANS SHOP (5,791 SF)

FLT MARINE FORCES ARMORY

(7,750 SF)

INDOOR MARKSMANSHIP TRAINER

(8,913 SF)

TELECOM RM (NMCI) (958 SF)

COMPANY HQ BLDG (15,565 SF)

HAZMAT STOR SHELTER (506 SF)

TELEPHONE EXCHANGE BUILDING

(4,000 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION


SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES





SITE PREPARATIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

8,596.6

2,496

1,465

596

538

720

828

89

1,446

47

371.6

2,151.19

1,166.07

1,724.31

1,853.37

1,373.9

1,903.84

2,910.29

2,262.69

1,129.75

2,191.28

18,070

(5,370)

(1,710)

(1,030)

(1,000)

(990)

(1,580)

(260)

(3,270)

(50)

(810)

(1,010)

(240)

(600)

(150)

18,020

(430)

(490)

(3,170)

(3,960)

(6,860)

(1,970)

(910)

(230)

36,090

1,800

37,890


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

41,4900216496M 61072

3/9 Maintenance/Ops Complex

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1220



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


January 2007

DD Form



SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



2,160

40,050

1,440

41,490

41,490

(2,340)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

41,4900216496M 61072


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1220



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)

Construct multi-story and single-story reinforced Concrete Masonry Unit

(CMU) buildings on pile foundations with structural steel framing,

reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete foundation and

floors, and standing seam metal roofs. Project will provide operations and

maintenance facilities for the 3rd Battalion, 9th Marines. Construction

will include administrative space, storage space, drive-through equipment

maintenance bays, communications/electronic equipment repair, telephone

exchange building to support area, secure weapons armory, indoor simulated

classroom, dedicated NMCI telecommunication rooms, showers and locker

areas, vehicle wash platforms, open storage area, sewage pumping station,

and oil/water separator. Built-in equipment includes a vehicle exhaust

system, a waste oil storage tank, 15-ton hydraulic lifts and 10-ton bridge

Crane in the motor transportation facility. Information Systems will

include telephone, Local Area Network (LAN), and voice and data

communication systems. Project will require 247 NMCI seats. Also includes

Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features.

Special construction features include pile foundations with reinforced

concrete footings. Sustainable design features will be included in the

design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders. Electrical

systems include fire alarms and energy saving electronic monitoring and

control systems (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire

protection systems, fire pump and Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning

(HVAC). Paving and site improvements include exterior site and building

lighting, paved parking and roadways, bridge with culvert over an existing

stream, intersection improvements and traffic signals, sidewalks, storm

water management, environmental protection measures, clearing and grubbing,

earthwork, fill, grading, landscaping, security fencing and gates, and

building and roadway signage. This project also includes all necessary

environmental mitigation and applicable site features to meet Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection minimum standards. The new facilities' design

will also provide all available types of new sustainable materials to the


January 2007

DD Form


Military construction is required to support the Commandant's end strength

increase initiative recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps

ever increasing role in the Global War on Terror. Current plans call for

3/9 to be integrated as an additional infantry battalion under the

operational control of one of the 2nd Marine Division Regimental Commands.

Specific requirements necessary to support the new battalion and its

assigned equipment include additional maintenance bays, admin space,

separate and secure tool rooms, separate and secure parts rooms, a battery

room, a crypto room, and an expansion of the tactical vehicle parking ramp.

There are currently no facilities available at Camp Lejeune to support 3/9

even as an interim or short term solution.

If this project is not funded, there will be no facilities to support the

new infantry battalion assigned to Camp Lejeune. There will be no

facilities to maintain equipment, carryout operational initiatives, command

and control the battalion personnel and to train the Marines to effectively

engage in the Global War on Terrorism.

This project provides efficiently configured motor transport maintenance,

comm/elec maintenance, and armory facilities to support the establishment

of an additional infantry battalion aboard MCB Camp Lejeune. This facility

requirement is in support of the Commandant's end strength increase

initiative recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever

increasing role in the Global War on Terror.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

The project will provide facility support and infrastructure to the newly

established 3rd Battalion 9th Marines (3/9). The project provides an

Operations Complex to include a Battalion Headquarters Facility, an Armory

Facility, a Motor Transport Maintenance Facility, a Comm/Elec Maintenance

Facility, a Supply Facility, and an Indoor Simulated Marksmanship Trainer

(ISMT). Due to increased personnel and operations, a telephone exchange

building is needed to support surrounding area requirements.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

41,4900216496M 61072


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1220




11. Requirement:


M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)

fullest extent possible, and shall achieve the U.S. Green Building

Council's minimum or higher LEED certification for the use of those types

of energy-saving systems and materials wherever possible in the project.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

41,4900216496M 61072


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1220




Audio-visual/VTC Equipment

Furniture/workstations

Intrusion Detection System (Armory)

NMCI seats

Telecom/printers/fax/copier

O&MMC

O&MMC

O&MMC

OPN

O&MMC

2009

2009

2009

2009

2009

250

875

100

865

250



Equipment

Nomenclature








W. L. Brant 910-451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$1,640

$1,390

$250

01/2008

09/2007

01/2010

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$1,340

$300


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


January 2007

DD Form



9. COST ESTIMATES


ADDITIONS TO REGIMENTAL

HEADQUARTERS (28,384 SF)

BLDG 123 ADDITION (6,997 SF)




NMCI/TELECOM ROOM (398 SF)


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION


SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES




SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,637

650

650

650

650

37

2,509.68

2,457.68

2,457.68

2,457.68

3,500

6,760

(1,630)

(1,600)

(1,600)

(1,600)

(130)

(100)

(70)

(30)

720

(200)

(210)

(210)

(10)

(30)

(30)

(30)

7,480

370

7,850

450

8,300

300

8,600

8,600

(298)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

8,6000216496M 61071

Additions to Regimental

Headquarters

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1221





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Construct a single-story addition of reinforced Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU)


January 2007

DD Form



Military construction is required to support the Commandant's end-strength


ever increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism. MCB Camp Lejeune does

not have facilities to support this additional personnel increases for four

regimental headquarters.

If these facilties requirements are not met, Camp Lejeune will not be able

to support the increase of personnel to the 2d, 6th, 8th, and 10th Marine

Regiments.

This project provides additional administrative space to the regimental

headquarters elements at Camp Lejeune, as a result of the Commandant's end

strength increase initiative to support the Global War on Terror.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project will construct additional administrative space to Buildings

123, 223, 423, and 522 in support of personnel increases (four officers and

thirty-eight enlisted) to the 2D, 6th, 8th, and 10th Marine Regiment, 2D

Marine Division.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

8,6000216496M 61071


Headquarters

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1221




11. Requirement:


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

building slab-on-grade floors, structural steel framing, brick veneer, and

standing seam metal roof. This project includes costs for technical

operating manuals and construction features to meet the minimum Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection requirements. Information systems include LAN

and telephone, data communications, and voice communications systems. A

total of one hundred sixty-four NMCI service connections/seats are required

for this project at four separate facilities (Bldgs. 123, 223, 423 and

522). Sustainable design features will be included in the construction of

the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and

Executive Orders. Special construction features include pile foundations

with reinforced grade beams. Electrical systems include fire alarm

systems, and mass notification systems. Mechanical systems include wet

pipe sprinkler system, sanitary sewer, and steam distribution. Paving and

site improvements include landscaping, sidewalks, and storm water

management. Demolition includes miscellaneous site demolition. The

project will provide site features to meet minimum Anti-Terrorism/Force

Protection measures.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

8,6000216496M 61071


Headquarters

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1221





NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

2008

2008

247

50



Equipment

Nomenclature








Brant, W. L. (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$344

$300

$44

01/2008

09/2007

07/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$300

$44


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

8,6000216496M 61071


Headquarters

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1221




Blank Page

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 131391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MP COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX

(13,164 SF)

COMPANY HQ (3,800 SF)

SUPPLY (1,496 SF)

ARMORY (1,281 SF)

WEAPONS CLEANING AREA (495 SF)

NMCI/TELECOM ROOM (1,076 SF)

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE (3,670 SF)

ELEC/COMM MAINT (1,345 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,223

353

139

119

46

100

341

125

2,569.03

1,056.21

2,038.99

967.6

3,990

1,924.26

1,955.3

3,100

(910)

(150)

(240)

(40)

(400)

(660)

(240)

(160)

(100)

(40)

(160)

1,950

(100)

(340)

(280)

(590)

(480)

(160)

5,050

250

5,300

300

5,600

200

5,800

5,800

(191)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,8000216496M 14320

MP Company Operations Complex

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1222





M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


January 2007

DD Form


Provide adequate and efficiently configured operational facilities to

support MP Company, as a result of the Commandant's end strength increase

initiative to support the Global War on Terror.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides an operations complex with motor transportation

operations and maintenance, supply, elec/comm maintenance, weapons storage,

weapons cleaning, and company headquarters for MP Company.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,8000216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1222




11. Requirement:

0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 1,223

CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)

Construct multi-story and single-story reinforced Concrete Masonry Unit

(CMU) buildings on pile foundations with structural steel framing,

reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete foundation and

floors, and standing seam metal roofs. Project will provide operations

facilities for the MP Company, 2D Marine Logistics Group. Construction

will include administrative space, storage space, drive-through equipment

maintenance bays, communications/electronic equipment repair, secure

weapons armory, dedicated NMCI telecommunication rooms, showers and locker

areas, vehicle wash platform, open storage area, and an oil/water

separator. Project will require 141 NMCI seats. Built in equipment

includes a vehicle exhaust system, a waste oil storage tank, and a 10-ton

hydraulic lift in the motor transportation facility. Also includes

Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features to

meet the minimum standards. Information Systems will include telephone,

Local Area Network (LAN), and voice and data communication systems.

Special construction features include pile foundations with reinforced

concrete footings. Sustainable design features will be included in the

design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders. Electrical

systems include fire alarms and energy saving electronic monitoring and

control system (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire

protection systems, fire pump and Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning

(HVAC). Paving and site improvements include exterior site and building

lighting, paved parking and roadways, sidewalks, storm water management,

environmental protection measures, clearing and grubbing, earthwork, fill,

grading, landscaping, security fencing, and building and roadway signage.

Also includes site Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features and necessary

environmental mitigation.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006




ever increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism. MCB Camp Lejeune does

not have facilities to support the additional population and equipment

increases for MP Company.

If these facilities requirements are not met, Camp Lejeune will not be able

to support the increase of personnel and equipment for an additional MP

Company.



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,8000216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1222





Intrusion Detection System

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

161

30



Equipment

Nomenclature








2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$230

$190

$40

01/2008

09/2007

07/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$200

$30


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,8000216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1222








M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 171391


9. COST ESTIMATES


TRUCK COMPANY,

MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS COMPLEX

(24,822 SF)

MOTOR-T FACILITY (18,557 SF)

COMPANY OFFICE (3,498 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (258

SF)

ARMORY (2,002 SF)

WEAPONS CLEANING AREA (506 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,306

1,724

325

24

186

47

1,349.08

2,126.94

3,427.47

2,033.22

1,018.53

4,130

(2,330)

(690)

(80)

(380)

(50)

(360)

(110)

(90)

(40)

3,750

(230)

(240)

(280)

(2,610)

(330)

(20)

(40)

7,880

390

8,270

470

8,740

320

9,060

9,150

(263)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

9,1500216496M 21451

Truck Company,

Maintenance/Operations Complex

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1223



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form


Military Construction is required to support HQMC end strength increase

initiative recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever

increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism. MCB Camp Lejeune does not

have facilities to support the additional population and equipment

Provide adequate and efficiently-configured facilities to support the

personnel and motor transportation assets of a new Truck Company, as a

result of the Commandant's end strength increase initiative to support the

Global War on Terror.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a consolidated motor transport complex for an

additional Truck Company for Headquarters Battalion, 2nd Marine Division.

This project provides motor transportation operations and maintenance,

company headquarters, weapons storage, and weapons cleaning facilities.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

9,1500216496M 21451

Truck Company,


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1223




11. Requirement:



CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Construct a motor transport maintenance/operations facility with reinforced

concrete masonry walls, structural steel framing, brick veneer, slab-on-

grade floors, and standing seam metal roof. Construction will include

drive-through equipment maintenance bays, a battery charging room, tool

storage, parts storage, administrative space, classroom space, showers and

lockers, and weapons storage/cleaning. Special construction features

include pile foundations with reinforced grade beams. Sustainable design

principles will be included in the construction of the project in

accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.

Built-in equipment includes a fire pump with generator backup, a 10-ton

hydraulic lift, 5-ton bridge crane, vehicle exhaust system, and lockers.

Information systems include CATV and LAN cabling. Electrical systems

include area lighting, information systems, telephone systems, and fire

alarm system. Mechanical systems include HVAC system, sanitary sewer, steam

distribution, lubrication system, compressed air, and vehicle exhaust

system. Site and paving improvements include landscaping, sidewalks,

parking and access driveways, roadway directional and operational signs,

security fencing, and storm water management retention pond. Also includes

Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features, and

necessary environmental mitigation. Two hundred NMCI service

connections/seats are required for this project.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006


increases for an additional Truck Company.


to support the increase of personnel and equipment for an additional Truck

Company.



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

9,1500216496M 21451

Truck Company,


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1223





NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

195

69



Equipment

Nomenclature











2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$366

$300

$66

01/2008

09/2007

07/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$316

$50


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

9,1500216496M 21451

Truck Company,


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1223





M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 211391


9. COST ESTIMATES


EOD ADDITION, FC 292 (7,901 SF)

ADDITION TO FC292 (7,901 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

734

734 1,824.74

1,460

(1,340)

(40)

(40)

(20)

(20)

780

(60)

(110)

(90)

(460)

(60)

2,240

110

2,350

130

2,480

90

2,570

2,570

(73)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

2,5700216496M 14320

EOD Addition, FC 292

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1224



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)

Construct a single-story EOD Team Operations and Training Facility addition

to BLDG FC292 having insulated, reinforced concrete masonry exterior cavity

walls with face brick veneer on CMU backup, pile-supported concrete

foundation and structural floor slab, cold-formed steel roof trusses, an

insulated standing seam metal roof system on steel roof decking. Built in

equipment includes window security bars. This project also includes

technical operating manuals. Special construction features include

interior masonry partition walls, ATFP-compliant exterior windows and

doors, ceiling insulation; acoustic suspended ceiling system, rest room and

locker areas, bulk EOD equipment storage areas, field equipment storage,

instruction areas. Information systems include LAN and telephone, data


January 2007

DD Form





ever increasing role in the Global War on Terror. MCB Camp Lejeune does not

have the facilities to support the additional population and equipment

increases for EOD operations.


to support the increase of personnel and equipment for EOD operations.

Provide adequate and efficiently-configured operations and training

facility to support the increased personnel and equipment to Explosive

Ordnance Disposal Platoon, as a result of the Commandant's end strength

increase initiative to support the Global War on Terror.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs an addition to FC292, EOD Operations Building, to

accomodate for increase in personnel and equipment.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

2,5700216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1224




11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 734



1. Status:

(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 01/2006

01/2007

M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)

communications, and voice communications systems, and mass notification

system. Sustainable design features will be included in the construction

of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and

Executive Orders. Electrical systems include fire alarm system and site

security lighting. Mechanical systems include wet pipe sprinkler system,

sanitary sewer, steam distribution, and heating & air conditioning system.

Paving and site improvements include landscaping, sidewalks, storm water

management, EOD vehicle & equipment parking, POV staff parking, and

security fencing. The new facility's design will also provide all

available types of new sustainable materials to the fullest extent

possible, and shall achieve the U.S. Green Building Council's minimum or

higher LEED certification for the use of those types of energy-saving

systems and materials wherever possible in the project. Thirty-six NMCI

service connections/seats are required for this project.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

2,5700216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1224





NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

2008

2008

48

25



Equipment

Nomenclature








W. L. Brant (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:



2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

$102

$90

$12

01/2008

09/2007

01/2009

06/2007

0%

2%

$97

$5


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

2,5700216496M 14320


MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1224




Blank Page

M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 251391


9. COST ESTIMATES


3/9 BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS,

HADNOT POINT (145,119 SF)

BEQ 1 (47,899 SF)

BEQ 2 (47,899 SF)

BEQ 3 (47,899 SF)

NMCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM

(1,421 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

13,482

4,450

4,450

4,450

132

1,921.17

1,921.17

1,922.15

3,500

28,410

(8,550)

(8,550)

(8,550)

(460)

(1,260)

(260)

(330)

(450)

6,870

(1,570)

(510)

(1,130)

(2,730)

(800)

(130)

35,280

1,760

37,040

2,110

39,150

1,410

40,560

40,560

(1,905)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

40,5600216496M 72124

3/9 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,

Hadnot Point

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1225





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Construct three multi-story interior corridor BEQs with interior and

exterior reinforced concrete masonry walls, brick masonry exterior veneer,


January 2007

DD Form


This project supports Commandant's end strength increase initiative

recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever increasing role

in the Global War on Terrorism. This project is required to provide

REQUIREMENT:

Provide 600 manspaces of adequate billeting for the Hadnot Point Area.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

40,5600216496M 72124


Hadnot Point

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1225




11. Requirement:


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

reinforced concrete slab with standing seam metal roof. Construction will

consist of 300 two-person rooms with semi-private bathrooms and walk-in

closets. This project will require 10 NMCI seats. Built-in equipment

includes three ADA certified elevators, a fire pump with generator backup,

and spectrally selective window glazing. This project also includes

Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features.

Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and

construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and

other laws and Executive Orders. Special construction features include

pile foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Electrical systems

include fire alarms and area lighting. Mechanical systems include fire

protection systems, HVAC system, plumbing, sanitary sewer, and steam

distribution. Information systems include CATV, LAN, telephone, and data

communication systems. Supporting facilities include site and utility

connections. Paving and site improvements include cleaning, staging and

drying area for personal issued field equipment; widening of Birch Street

to four lanes from Cross Street to the existing four lane section of Birch

Street; recreation areas; sidewalks; parking and access driveways; signage;

a storm water management retention pond; site fill to stabilize and improve

site drainage and accessibility; and landscaping. Necessary environmental

mitigation and site Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features have also been

included. The new facility's design will also provide all available types

of new sustainable materials to the fullest extent possible, and shall

achieve the U.S. Green Building Council's minimum or higher LEED

certification for the use of those types of energy-saving systems and

materials wherever possible in the project.

Intended Grade Mix: 318 E1-E3, 144 E4-E5.

Total: 462 Persons.

Maximum Utilization: 600 E1-E3.


January 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2005

January 2006


MCB Camp Lejeune's existing barracks inventory will not support the standup

of an additional infantry battalion (3/9). Even without the additional

infantry battalion there already exists a billeting deficiency of 4,252

manspaces in the Hadnot Point area, which is predominantly occupied by the

2D Marine Division. Due to the current billeting deficiency that already

exists, permanent party Marines in some cases are being billeted without

adherence to the Minimum Standards of Adequacy. Marines are currently

being over billeted in otherwise adequate barracks causing overcrowded

conditions.

There will be no where at MCB Camp Lejeune to billet 3rd Battalion, 9th

Marines. Also meeting the policies and goals of the BEQ Campaign Plan and

the Commandant's intent of "COHESION" is not attainable due to manspace

deficiencies. Quality of life for the Marines of 2d Marine Division in the

Hadnot Point area will continue to decline. Existing BEQ facilities will

continue to be heavily used with little or no down time for

scheduled/cyclic maintenance.

additional adequate billeting for the 3rd Battalion 9th Marines.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

40,5600216496M 72124


Hadnot Point

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1225







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

4. Contract award:


1. Status:


No

$1,620

$1,420

$200

09/2007

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$1,400

$220


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

40,5600216496M 72124


Hadnot Point

MARINE CORPS 2007FY

P1225




Collateral Equipment (Various)

NMCI Connections

O&MMC

PMC

2011

2011

1,846

59



Equipment

Nomenclature








Brant, WL (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:



01/2008

01/2010

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


2005 R&M Conducted ($000): 11,0582006 R&M Conducted ($000): 5,903

54,740

C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 291391


9. COST ESTIMATES


DIESEL GENERATOR FACILITY

POWER PLANT BLDG.

STD-BY GENR PLT

STREET LIGHTING

PERMTR/SEC LIGHT

ELECTRICAL DISTR LINE

POL PIPELINE

SWITCHING STAT/SECT (2,000 KV)

TRANSFORMER STA

UNDERGRD ELECTRICAL LINES

BASE COURSE CRUSHED

DEMOLITION

COMPRESSED AIR PLANT

CONCRETE

ENERGY SURVEY COST


LEED SILVER AND EPACT

COMPLIANCE

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (8%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

SF

EA

LF

LF

MI

LF

KV

EA

LF

SY

EA

EA

SY

LS

LS

40,000

1

8,000

4,000

12

8,000

2,000

1

2,000

2,600

1

1

2,000

204.62

660,000

47.19

38.86

183,564.81

170.02

91.77

539,173.98

26.04

21.08

2,547,597.06

741,364.22

220.74

18,650

(8,180)

(660)

(380)

(160)

(2,200)

(1,360)

(180)

(540)

(50)

(50)

(2,550)

(740)

(440)

(1,160)

90

(90)

18,740

940

19,680

1,570

21,250

750

22,000

22,000

(18,000)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

22,0000212476N 81109


NAVY 2007FY

P333G

NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAYGUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60514

Constuct a new power plant (PP5) on the bluff (Corinaso Point) above the

existing power plant (PP4) to accommodate five diesel generators, and

provide space and expansion capability to accommodate additional diesel

generators. The modular, weather-proof building will include a gantry crane

for efficient equipment servicing.


January 2007

DD Form


To upgrade existing electrical system to support growth of population at

GTMO and decrease escalating energy costs. This project will also decrease

emissions by mothballing current generators that are inefficient. Energy

and operational savings will be achieved through higher efficiency of the

new generators, and higher average geneerator loads due to improved system

PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

22,0000212476N 81109


NAVY 2007FY

P333G



11. Requirement:

Adequate: Substandard:

The new power generators will be connected to the distribution system and

will bypass the buss limitation in PP4. New switchgear will be installedand the existing PP4 SF-6 switches and step-up transformers T1-T2 will beutilized. Constuct a road way to the new Power Plant PP-5 on Corinaso

Point with security fencing, and security lighting. Install POL/lube lines

for diesel distribution for generators and aircompressor with supportingfacilities required to operate the Power Plant as described below:

1. Five new 3,580 KW EMD generators with noise reduction silencers/exhaust.

2. Bay water cooled radiators for each diesel generator.

3. Weather-proof generator building located on the bluff (Corinaso Point)

above PP4 to house the five new generators. The building will include a

usable gantry crane for generator maintenance and repair.

4. New independent and redundant electrical substaion, step up transformer,

and collector generation modular switchgear capable of handling the five

new diesel generators and up to four additional units.

5. Metal building to house support equipment.

6. Emergency generator for black start operation of new generators.

7. Foundations for generators, buildings, and equipment.

8. Control integration with N5 and N6.

9. Diesel fuel delivery and recovery system utilizing the existing PP4 fuel

tanks.

10. Lube oil delivery and recovery system utilizing the existing PP4 lube

oil tanks.

11. Air compressor system for starting diesel generators.

12. Load shed system setup and interrgration.

13. Electrical distribution study.

14. Relay coordination study.

16. Fencing, Lighting, road/Parking and signage.

Compliance with the Energy Policy Act 2005 will be integrated into the

design and construction through the use of items such as increased "R"

values of wall and roof, specified energy-star HVAC equipment and use of

LEED Energy credits 1.1 through 1.5 "Optimize Energy Performance


January 2007

DD Form


A review of PP4 operating data from September and November 2005 and

January through March 2006 show that the peak demand is now in excess of 21

MW, and loads of over 135,000,000 KWH/YR. By averaging and extrapolating

current power consumption data, and including additional loads that will

occure due to facilities now being built and are scheduled to be completed

by December 2008 (estimated completion of construction for PP5), the

expected annual load will be 150,000,000 KWH, the actual number will be

determined during the Distribution Electrical Study (DES). We are also

realizing growth with current expansion of Joint Task Force (JTF) and

increased electrical loading.

The whole of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is self sustaining,totally isolated from

the Continental United States. We produce our own electricity, and water.

Naval Base Guantanamo Bay is strategically located on the Eastern end of

the island of Cuba. Primary missions assigned to the base include support

for air operations related to logistical functions of U. S. Navy, Coast

Guard, Joint Task Force and other U. S. Military and Government contingency

operations in the Caribbean. A primary goal of this mission is to maintain

a forward presence near the Windward Passage to the Caribbean for the

conduct of counter-drug operations. Guantanamo also has a contingency for

migrant operations. If we don't upgrade our electrical grid, we will incur

electrical outages that will also effect our water supply, sewage,

environmental controls and even prevent us from fueling our vehicles. This

would drastically affect all operations here at Guantanamo Bay.

The increased fuel cost and escalation of fuel in upcoming years requires

us to use conservation measures. Installing new high energy efficient

generators and upgrading our power grid will maximize fuel usage and enablethe Government to more efficiently manage utility costs.

To have a reliable, and efficient power production facility with out

enduring equipment failure and brown-out conditons, and bring the best cost

savings forward while adhering to the highest level of emission standards

for the U.S. Navy Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Also by replacing older inefficient

production and using new high energy efficient generators the government

will actually save money as rising cost of fuel demand higher costs in

power production.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

reliability. Because of increased efficiency and cleaner operationof the new diesel generators in PP5, emissions of carbide dioxide,a major cause of global warming, should decrease by up to 20,000 tonsper year.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

22,0000212476N 81109


NAVY 2007FY

P333G




January 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2005

January 2006


With out this project utility cost will be much higher, and would shortfall

our anual budgets in future years.


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

22,0000212476N 81109


NAVY 2007FY

P333G



Diesel Generators (Budgeted by GWOT

Supplemental)

OPN 2007 18,000



Equipment

Nomenclature


The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for

joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This is an

installation utility/infrastructure project and does not qualify for joint

use at this location, however, all tenants on this installation are

benefited by this project.

CDR Jeff Johnston 011-5399-4419Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$750

$90

$660

01/2008

09/2007

12/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

0%

$600

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 331391


9. COST ESTIMATES


ELECTRICAL POWER PLANT

FUEL STORAGE TANK (375,653 GA)

GENERATOR SWITCHGEAR

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

PRIMARY (17,500 LF)

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION UG

PRIMARY (2,001 LF)

ADMIN AND SWITCHGEAR ROOM

(3,670 SF)

GENERATOR BUILDING (3,348 SF)

GENERATORS (20 MB)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS

SPECIAL COSTS






SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

L

EA

m

m

m2

m2

Mw

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,422,000

1

5,334

610

341

311

6

0.54

2,087,285.06

209.03

575.65

4,488.72

5,400.66

998,853.36

14,480

(770)

(2,090)

(1,110)

(350)

(1,530)

(1,680)

(5,990)

(60)

(160)

(70)

(670)

1,100

(210)

(240)

(10)

(360)

(230)

(50)

15,580

780

16,360

1,010

17,370

620

17,990

17,990


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

17,9900212476N 81110


NAVY 2007FY

P902G

CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A

Provides additional 11 kV electrical distribution, two new 2980 KW prime

power diesel generators rated 11 kV, generator shelter, and 15 kV


January 2007

DD Form


(CENTCOM) Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA)'s mission is

to: detect, disrupt, and ultimately defeat transnational terrorist groups

operating in the region and deny safe havens, external support, and

material assistance for terrorist activity in the region. They also

provide host nations a stable and secure environment where all people have

the freedom of choice. Camp Lemonier, Djibouti serves as CJTF-HOA's

expeditionary headquarters and base camp. Camp Lemonier, Djibouti requires

an investment in basic infrastructure to make use of recently leased

property contracted to allow the US to observe minimum ATFP setback

requirements for personnel berthing and administration facilities. These

projects provide basic life support measures and the scope of each project

has been refined to provide only essential, sustainable infrastructure.

The designed outcome is to minimize any "stay-behind" infrastructure but

still provide the basic life support services to deployed personnel

This project is required to provide an adequate and reliable electrical

REQUIREMENT:

Project provides reliable electrical power through the construction of an

electric power plant and its associated distrubution system.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

17,9900212476N 81110


NAVY 2007FY

P902G



11. Requirement:


switchgear with an air-conditioned control room supplementing the existing

generation and electrical distribution system. The switchgear lineup shall

contain four generator circuit breakers and two future spaces, generator

bus tie, generator control panels with paralleling capability, four feeder

circuit breakers and two spaces, and bus tie breakers to the existing

weatherproof switchgear. Provides 11 kV grounding transformer for each 11

kV bus. Sound reducing noise attenuation features (i.e. sound wall, low

noise silencers etc.) shall be incorporated into this project to reduce

noise to acceptable levels in the berthing areas. Constructs 11 kV three-

phase overhead/underground electrical distribution lines from the

generation plant throughout the existing and expansion area of the camp

(5,334 m.) Lines shall be constructed of 4/0 CU on 45' Class 3 poles. This

project demolishes the existing KBR camp generation and existing

expeditionary 380/220 v electrical distribution in the existing camp and

provides 11 kV feeders and 11 kV - 380/220 utilization transformers and low

voltage distribution (1,800 m.) to feed existing camp loads. Power system

analysis shall be incorporated to coordinate and set all protective devices

in the electrical utility system.


January 2007

DD Form


The electrical transmission and distribution system at Camp Lemonier is in

need of an upgrade for capacity, reliability, redundancy and safety. The

existing electrical distribution circuits throughout the Camp Lemonier are

temporary in nature, subject to voltage drops, and are causing equipment

failures. Existing capacity is provided though a combination of prime

power and tactical generator (146 total) and unreliable Djiboutian

commercial power. Existing reliable generation capability is 4,330 KW,

with an additional 1,696 KW presently being installed. Near-term funded

projects will create total generation requirements of 7,915 KW exceeding

current generation capacity by 5,799 KW. These projects presently under

construction will increase load exceeding the reliable generation capacity.

This project will provide expected future capacity in concurrance with the

near term requirements of the Expeditionary Base Development Plan.

Proposed construction of additional planned projects at Camp Lemonier

requires upgrades to the existing electrical generation and distribution

supporting the site.

The electrical distribution will become overloaded and will continue to be

unreliable in the existing camp area. Without new electrical distribution

into the expansion area, Camp Lemonier will not be able to support

facilities designed to increase the ATFP posture by properly utilizing the

expansion area of the recently negotiated $30 million annual land lease.

The transition from expeditionary to semi-permanent facilities also can not

be supported without additional generation capacity. Planned facilities

will not be powered by efficient prime power generation, but by inefficient

tactical generators instead. Outages will result due to circuit

overloading and requiring equipment maintenance and repairs to be performed

more frequently. Severe voltage drop on low voltage feeders shall continue

to cause damage to equipment.

Under the terms of the recently negotiated lease agreement, currently

occupied land must be returned, significantly deteriorating ATFP posture.

Because of this, some current missions should be relocated to the expansion

utility infrastructure for the continuing development and construction of

facilities at Camp Lemonier. Near-term generation requirements to support

personnel loading are estimated to be 11,815 KW or an additional 5,799 KW

above current capacity. Consolidation of operation of all generation

within one control room shall provide a more efficient operation. This

project shall provide a more reliable, energy efficient electrical

distribution system


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

17,9900212476N 81110


NAVY 2007FY

P902G




January 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2005

January 2006


area to provide adequate standoff.


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

17,9900212476N 81110


NAVY 2007FY

P902G







joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.

LCDR Jake Ellwood 318-824-4064Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$486

$80

$406

01/2008

09/2007

06/2009

01/2006

01/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$406

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 371391

PROJECT:


9. COST ESTIMATES


WATER PRODUCTION

REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANT (399,999

GA)

WATER DISTRIBUTION (10,000 LF)





SITE PREPARATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

L

m

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,514,160

3,048

7.83

679.13

14,150

(11,860)

(2,070)

(220)

1,710

(980)

(350)

(380)

15,860

790

16,650

1,030

17,680

630

18,310

18,310


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

18,3100212476N 84110

WATER PRODUCTION

NAVY 2007FY

P903G



11. Requirement:


Construct a two Reverse Osmosis Cell water production facility. Each cell

will provide 757,080 liter/day (200,000 gpd). The facility will include

approximately 1,500 M (5,000 LF) of piping from the beach wells to the

production facility. Electrical utilities are included to support the

water production facility. The facility will be secured with a 400 LF

chain link fence and gate to limit access to authorized staff/maintenance

personnel only. Also included is 10,000 LF of underground water

distribution piping to connect existing and near-term proposed facilities.

The waste water from the RO cells is discharged through a combined

discharge pipe included in the wastewater treatment project P-913 and

assumed to be constructed first and not included in this project.


January 2007

DD Form


The three existing Reverse Osmosis Water Production Units (ROWPU) produce

approximately 100,000 gallons/day maximum. Additional bulk water is

purchased locally and trucked into the camp to meet current consumption.

This water is then heavily chlorinated, not potable, does not meet USEPA

drinking water standards and is distributed for non-potable uses only.

Additional bottled water is imported for all potable water uses including

cooking, drinking, and oral hygiene at an annual cost of approximately $2

million.

The current treatment plant is at its capacity of 100,000 gallon/day and

will not meet the 200,000 gallon/day demands of current camp population.

This project includes the capability to bring one of the 200,000 gallon/day

R/O trains down for maintenance at a time and still maintain operations.















To provide a water production facility that will produce potable water that

meets USEPA drinking water standards for the current population located at

the camp with adequate reserve capacity to supply the structural

firefighting reserve capacity for all current and near-term facilities.

The proposed configuration must also provide adequate reserve capacity for

scheduled maintenance based on current CENTCOM directed camp populations.

A distribution network to the near-term projects in the expansion area is

required to take full advantage of the potential increase in the ATFP

posture by providing the CENTCOM directed setbacks in the expansion area.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a new Reverse Osmosis (RO) water production

facility and water distribution piping.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

18,3100212476N 84110

WATER PRODUCTION

NAVY 2007FY

P903G




January 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2005

January 2006


Near-term camp expansion and construction of additional facilities in

accordance with the Master Plan require upgraded water treatment and

distribution capability before the camp can transition from expeditionary

facilities into semi-permanent facilities with their projected increased

water demands. The current plant also does not have the capacity to

provide water in sufficient quantities for adequate structural fire

protection for the camp. Personnel will continue to be exposed to

substandard water quality and potential waterborne diseases from water that

does not meet USEPA standards. Imported bottled water costs will continue

to be incurred.






4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

18,3100212476N 84110

WATER PRODUCTION

NAVY 2007FY

P903G







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$660

$80

$580

09/200703/2007

09/2008

01/2006

03/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$580

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

18,3100212476N 84110

WATER PRODUCTION

NAVY 2007FY

P903G








NONE


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 411391

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a new water storage tank with a capacity of

1,892,700 L (500,000 gallons).

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


WATER STORAGE (500,000 GA)

WATER STORAGE TANK, ELEVATED

(500,000 GA)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS




SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

L

L

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,892,706

1,892,706 1.75

3,910

(3,310)

(540)

(30)

(30)

970

(520)

(30)

(310)

(110)

4,880

240

5,120

320

5,440

200

5,640

5,630


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,6300212476N 84130

WATER STORAGE

NAVY 2007FY

P904G



11. Requirement:1,892,706

0Adequate: Substandard:1,022,058L L

Construct a 1,892,700 L (500,000 gallon) capacity steel water tank.

Construct/install a chain link fence barrier, 180 m (600 LF) around the

perimeter of storage facility. Construction also includes

foundation/support system, pressurization pumps, pipes, and electrical

support. Demolish two existing (75,000 gallon) aboveground fiberglass

water storage tanks and temporary bladders.


January 2007

DD Form


Water is produced from three existing Reverse Osmosis Water Purification

Units. It does not meet USEPA drinking water standards and is therefore

not distributed for potable use. Water is stored in two aboveground

fiberglass tanks and a temporary bladder storage tank with a combined

capacity of 270,000 gallons. These tanks are subject to rapid

deterioration in the harsh desert conditions, and currently cannot be

filled to capacity due to structural concerns.

The camp is in violation of fire safety codes without sufficient storage to

adequately fight structural fires.

Existing storage capacity of 270,000 gallons does not meet minimum storage

amounts of 500,000 gallons mandated by accepted design guidance in UFC 3-

230-02, UFC 3-600-01 for the structural fire safety requirements.

Additional facilities are under construction in the expansion area to

support the transition from expeditionary facilities to semi-permanent

facilities. These facilities are designed to support the minimum CENTCOM

ATFP standards and will create additional structural fire safety concerns.

Existing water tanks cannot be fully utilized due to structural concerns

and are subject to further environmental deterioration in the harsh desert

environment. Personnel will continue to to be exposed to water quality

that does not meet USEPA standards. Imported bottled water costs ($2M















To provide a water storage facility that will store potable water that

meets USEPA drinking water standards for the current camp population with a

reserve capacity of three days supply with capacity for structural fire

fighting to adequately protect all near term facilities in the exsiting

camp and the expansion area.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,6300212476N 84130

WATER STORAGE

NAVY 2007FY

P904G




January 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2005

January 2006


annually) will continue to be incurred.






4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,6300212476N 84130

WATER STORAGE

NAVY 2007FY

P904G












2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$249

$49

$200

01/2008

09/2007

01/2009

01/2006

03/2007

06/2007

0%

2%

$200

$49


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

5,6300212476N 84130

WATER STORAGE

NAVY 2007FY

P904G



Blank Page


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 451391

This project constructs a new wastewater treatment plant with a capacity of

946,350 L/day (250,000 gallons/day).

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


WASTEWATER TREATMENT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

SEWAGE LIFT STATION W/ 3048M

FORCE MAIN

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS




SITE PREPARATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

EA

EA

EA

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2

1

1

9,287,652.33

5,376,138

15,870

(9,290)

(5,380)

(1,100)

(70)

(30)

1,190

(1,070)

(50)

(70)

17,060

850

17,910

1,110

19,020

680

19,700

19,700


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

19,7000212476N 83110


NAVY 2007FY

P913G



11. Requirement:


Construct a biological wastewater treatment plant. The plant will consist

of two treatment trains capable of treating 125,000 gallons per day with a

rotating biological contactor (RBC) process with adequate reserve treatment

capacity for necessary maintenance. The project includes lift stations,

pressurized piping, and gravity collection piping in the existing camp and

the expansion area. The project also constructs a combined outfall pipe

for direct discharge to the ocean that will also carry waste water from

water production processes. The existing treatment plant will be

demolished upon completion of this project.


January 2007

DD Form


The current wastewater treatment plant is an extended aeration activated

sludge plant operating at full capacity and capable of treating 264,978

l/day (70,000 gpd). No sludge handling facility exists at the camp, so

sludge must be pumped out on a weekly basis. The existing pre-treatment

holding tank is regularly at capacity during peak morning discharge

periods. The plant effluent discharges into an open dry streambed,

accumulating in a large marshy area just outside the existing camp

compound. This marshy area is located in an area designated for near-term

base development projects mandated by relocated facilities because of the

recently negotiated land lease. This area must be drained, with the

outfall relocated to the waterfront for health, safety, and quality of life

standards.

The current plant has insufficient capacity to treat the expected increases

in wastewater generation as the camp transitions from expeditionary to

semi-permanent facilities, and water usage increases. The current plant is

not capable of supporting any additional wastewater. The current plant's

discharge will continue to restrict the camp's transition into the recently

acquired expansion area that is now swampy with effluent.

The combined outfall pipe included in this project is required for complete















To provide a wastewater treatment facility that treats all expected

sanitary and industrial sewage for the current population located at the

camp with adequate reserve capacity to perform required maintenance.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

19,7000212476N 83110


NAVY 2007FY

P913G




January 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2005

January 2006


functionality of the water production project. Without this outfall

additional costs will be incurred on the water production project (P-903),

possibly requiring reprogramming.






4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

19,7000212476N 83110


NAVY 2007FY

P913G












2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$249

$49

$200

04/200701/2007

04/2008

01/2006

01/2007

04/2007

0%

2%

$200

$49


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


January 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

19,7000212476N 83110


NAVY 2007FY

P913G



Blank Page


January 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 491391

REQUIREMENT:

Planning and design funds.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


PLANNING AND DESIGN

DESIGN COSTS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (0%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (0%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

204,600

(204,600)

204,600

0

204,600

0

204,600

204,600

204,600


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

204,600

Planning and Design

NAVY 2007FY

P107G

PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


11. Requirement:

$4,600K of these Planning and Design funds are to be utilized to design

construction projects in this submission under Title 10 USC 2807 for

architectural and engineering services and construction design in

connection with military construction projects including regular program

projects, unspecified minor construction, emergency construction, land

appraisals, and special projects as directed. Engineering investigations,

such as field surveys and foundation exploration, will be undertaken as

necessary.

$200,000K of these Planning and Design funds are required to support the

Grow the Force initiative which brings the Marine Corps end-strength to

202K. These funds will allow for the up-front design effort of the

Military Construction projects supporting the initiative. Funds to be

utilized under Title 10 USC 2807 for architectural and engineering services

and construction design in connection with military construction projects

including regular program projects, unspecified minor construction,

emergency construction, land appraisals, and special projects as directed.

Engineering investigations, such as field surveys and foundation

exploration, will be undertaken as necessary.


January 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract



September 2005

January 2006


$200,000K of these Planning and Design funds will provide support for the

Commandant of the Marine Corps' approved end-strength increase.

N/A

All projects in a military construction program presented for approval must

be based on sound engineering and the best cost data available. For this

reason, design is initiated to establish project estimates in advance of

program submittal to the Congress. Based on this preliminary design, final

plans and specifications are then prepared. These costs for architectural

and engineering services and construction design are not provided for in

the construction project cost estimates except in those where Design/Build

contracting method is used.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


04 JAN 2007

204,600

Planning and Design

NAVY 2007FY

P107G

PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA





N/A

LtCol M.L. Scalise (703) 695-8202Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$0


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE

APN Volume I (BA 1-4) - SECRETARY OF THE NAVY

Documents

Transcript of APN Volume I (BA 1-4) - SECRETARY OF THE NAVY