Analysis of performance of cost volume profit (CVP) analysis ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Analysis of performance of cost volume profit (CVP) analysis ...
The University of Dodoma
University of Dodoma Institutional Repository http://repository.udom.ac.tz
Business Master Dissertations
2013
Analysis of performance of cost volume
profit (CVP) analysis in manufacturing
companies in Tanzania: a case of
Tanzania Portland Cement Company (TPCC)
Ndongolo, Rahabu P
The University of Dodoma
Ndongolo, R.P. (2013). Analysis of performance of cost volume profit (CVP) analysis in
manufacturing companies in Tanzania: a case of Tanzania Portland Cement Company (TPCC).
Dodoma: The University of Dodoma
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/1751
Downloaded from UDOM Institutional Repository at The University of Dodoma, an open access institutional repository.
ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE OF COST VOLUME PROFIT (CVP)
ANALYSIS IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN TANZANIA - A CASE
OF TANZANIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY (TPCC))
Rahabu Philip Ndongolo
Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Master of Business Administration of the University of Dodoma
The University of Dodoma
October, 2013
i
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certification that I have read and hereby recommend to the senate
for acceptance, a dissertation entitled; Analysis of Performance of Cost Volume
Profit (CVP) Analysis in Manufacturing Companies in Tanzania - a Case Of
Tanzania Portland Cement Company (TPCC)) in a partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of Masters of Business Administration (MBA) of the
University of Dodoma.
…………………………………………
Professor Inderjeet Singh Sodhi
(SUPERVISOR)
Date………………………….
ii
DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT
I, Rahabu Philip Ndongolo hereby proclaim that this dissertation is an outcome of
my personal research work with the exception of the literature acted, which served as
a source of information. This work is in no way a duplicate in any party or in whole
of a work ever presented for the award of a degree or publication. I further confirm
that works by other authors, which were used as references and resource material
have been acknowledged.
Signature ……………………………….
(HD/UDOM/169/T.2010)
This dissertation is a copyrighted material under the author, the copyright Act of
1999 and other national and international acting. In that behalf, none of the material
of this work may be reproduced in full or part, stored in any retrieval system, or
transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the
Directorate of Post Graduate Studies on behalf of both the author and the University
of Dodoma.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Magnificence, respect, brilliance, perfectibility, sovereignty and celebrity are
credited unto the Almighty God who in his immeasurable affection steered me to the
successful completion of this study. Wholeheartedly, I am in meagreness of the
words to express my indebtedness to him.
This dissertation would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of
several individuals who in one way or another contributed and extended their
valuable assistance in the preparation and completion of this study.
First and foremost, I would like to reveal my utmost gratitude to Professor
INDERJEET SIGH SODHI for his tireless, perfectly, sincerity and encouraging
supervision. I also admirably express my gratitude to Dr. AME for his
encouragement and guides on the preparation of and completion of this report
together with the management and all staff of the University of Dodoma (UDOM). I
am thankful to management and other staff of TPCC for consenting me to collect
data at their company.
More specifically, to my lovely husband Wilbert Fabian for his delightful support
and encouragement and lovely sons Dickson and David for keeping me busy but
pleased. To my parents Mr. and Mrs. Kalugira for their prayers and encouragement,
may God bless them! Finally, is the heartfelt thanks to all my wonderful friends
Sylvestry January, Annastanzia Majenga, Khalid Karabaki and Frank Mkomochi for
their contribution in my studies.
iv
DEDICATION
This study is dedicated to my cherished husband Mr. Wilbert and my children
Dickson and David for their endless love, encouragement and support for
accomplishment of this work.
v
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the study on the subject of the analysis of performance of Cost
Volume Profit (CVP) analysis in manufacturing companies in Tanzania, a case of
Tanzania Portland Cement Company. Cost volume profit analysis is a model which
is used to plan profit. The general objective of this study was to determine if CVP
can assist management in formulating pricing policies by projecting the effect of
different price structures on cost and profit and to highlight the usefulness of CVP
analysis in manufacturing companies in Tanzania. Specifically, this study desired to
understand the relevancy and efficiency of Cost Volume Profit analysis as a
decisions model in helping manufacturing business to face the challenges caused by
the ever changing business environment predominantly in Tanzania, as policy
makers in making relevant policies.
A case study survey type of research was used in which a sample from the target
population was selected as a source of information needed to achieve researcher‟s
objectives. Consequently, random probability sampling and non-random sampling
were selected. This study included both qualitative and quantitative data. Thus, the
researcher collected data by administering a questionnaire along with interviews to
pave the way for easy analysis of data. Focus group discussion was also conducted
for top management team and employees who are working in management
accounting unit as well as production manager.
The analysis showed that, CVP analysis, though it is a very useful tool for decision
making, is based upon certain assumptions which can rarely be completely realized
vi
in practice. This leads managers and policy makers to forget about the usefulness of
the model and conclude that CVP is not effective and efficient technique for decision
making. In presented enterprise, CVP analysis seemed to be not well known and
hence not applied for managers to find out and decide what to do to improve business
and get planned values of certain indicators.
Due to competition and complexity of the structure of production, traditional
management accounting techniques are not giving the fruitful result to response to
the keen competition. Thus, manufacturing organizations have to adopt advanced
management accounting techniques. Therefore, policy makers should pave the way
for policy implanters to select the model for decision making and test the sensitivity
of the model with alternative scenarios and judge which outcome best describes their
beliefs about the future. To help managers make better decisions, accountants should
evaluate the quality of the techniques they use, given the organizational setting and
decisions to be made.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title ……………………………………………………………………………. i
Certification …………………………………………………………………… ii
Declaration and Copyright…………………………………………………….. iii
Acknowledgement……………………………………………………………… iv
Dedication ……………………………………………………………………… v
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… vi
Table of Contents …………………………………………………………......... viii
List of Table …………………………………………………………………… xiv
List of Figure …………………………………………………………………. xv
List of Abbreviations ………………………………………………………… xvi
CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL INTRODUCTION…………………………… 1
1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 1
1.1 Background to the Study ………………………………………………….. 1
1.1.1 CVP Analysis; an Overview……………………………………………… 1
1.1.2 Economists versus Accountants view of CVP Analysis…………………. 2
1.2 Statement of the Problem ………………………………………………… 4
1.3 Objectives of the Study…………………………………………………… 8
1.3.1 General Objective ………………………………………………………. 8
1.3.2 Specific Objectives ……………………………………………………… 8
1.4 Research Questions ……………………………………………………….. 8
1.5 Significance of the Study …………………………………………………. 9
1.6 Scope of the Study ………………………………………………………… 9
1.7 Limitations of the Study …………………………………………………… 11
viii
1.8 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………… 12
CHAPTER TWO: LITERTURE REVIEW ………………………………. 13
2.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………. 13
2.1 Theoretical Review of Literature………………………………………… 14
2.1.1 The Concept of Cost Volume Profit (CVP) Analysis ……………….... 14
2.1.2 Definitions of Key Terms ……………………………………………… 15
2.1.2.1 Cost…………………………………………………………………… 15
2.1.2.2 Volume ………………………………………………………………. 15
2.1.2.3 Profit ………………………………………………………………….. 16
2.1.2.4 Break-Even Point ……………………………………………………... 16
2.1.2.5 Margin of Safety ……………………………………………………… 17
2.1.2.6 Degree of Operating Leverage ………………………………………… 17
2.1.3 Cost Volume Profit Chart ……………………………………………… 18
2.1.4 Theories Related to CVP ……………………………………………….. 19
2.1.4.1 Theory of Cost………………………………………………………… 20
2.1.4.2 Theory of Production …………………………………………………. 22
2.1.4.3 Pricing Theory ………………………………………………………… 23
2.1.4.4 Theory of the Firm …………………………………………………… 23
2.1.4.5 Theory of Constraints …………………………………………………. 24
2.1.5 Factors Affecting Cost Volume Profit Analysis ………………………… 26
2.1.5.1 Basic Constituents ……………………………………………………… 26
2.1.5.2 Income Statement ………………………………………………………. 27
2.1.5.3 Contribution Margin …………………………………………………… 28
2.1.5.4 Fixed Costs …………………………………………………………… 28
ix
2.1.6 Challenges Facing Manufacturing Companies When Using CVP Analysis for
Decision Making ……………………………………………………………… 29
2.1.6.1 Linearity of Total Revenue and Total Cost Schedule ……………….. 29
2.1.6.2 Similarities to Standard Economic Model ……………………………. 29
2.1.6.3 Focus on Revenue and Operating Expenses ………………………….. 30
2.1.6.4 Wealth Impacts of CVP Decisions ……………………………………. 31
2.1.7 CVP Analysis and the Modern Manufacturing Firms …………………… 31
2.1.7.1 Cost Structure ………………………………………………………….. 31
2.1.7.2 Technology and Competition ………………………………………….. 32
2.1.7.3 Strategic Planning ……………………………………………………… 32
2.1.8 Budgeting and CVP Analysis …………………………………………… 33
2.1.9 CVP as Performance Evaluation Tool …………………………………… 34
2.2 Empirical Literature Review ………………………………………………. 35
2.3 Knowledge Gap ……………………………………………………………. 40
2.4 Critical Review of Literature………………………………………………. 40
2.4.1 Criticisms of Studies by Researchers …………………………………… 40
2.4.2 Criticisms of CVP ……………………………………………………….. 42
2.5 Conceptual Framework of the Study ………………………………………. 44
2.6 Relevance of Literature …………………………………………………….. 47
2.7 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………. 50
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………………… 51
3.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………….. 51
3.1 Research Design ………………………………………………………….. 51
3.2 Population ……………………………………………………………… 52
3.3 Sampling and Sampling Techniques …………………………………… 52
x
3.3.1 Sample Size …………………………………………………………… 54
3.4 Data Collection Methods ………………………………………………… 55
3.4.1 Primary Data …………………………………………………………… 55
3.4.2 Secondary Data ………………………………………………………… 55
3.4.3 Data collection Instruments ……………………………………………. 55
3.4.3.1 Questionnaire …………………………………………………………. 56
3.4.3.2 Interview ……………………………………………………………… 57
3.5 Data Analysis …………………………………………………………….. 58
3.6 Reliability and Validity of the Study …………………………………….. 58
3.6.1 Reliability ………………………………………………………………. 58
3.6.2 Validity …………………………………………………………………. 59
3.6.3 Achieving Validity and Reliability ……………………………………. 59
CHAPTER FOUR: STUDY FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 61
4.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………….. 61
4.1 Features of Respondents …………………………………………………… 62
4.1.1 Gender Parity ……………………………………………………………. 62
4.1.2 Level of Education ………………………………………………………. 62
4.1.3 Work Experience ………………………………………………………… 63
4.2 Historical Background of the Company …………………………………… 64
4.3 Objective One: General Understanding of Cost Volume Profit Analysis … 65
4.3.1 CVP Analysis Awareness ……………………………………………….. 65
4.3.2 Linearity of Costs and Revenue ………………………………………… 65
xi
4.3.3 Drivers of Costs …………………………………………………………. 66
4.3.4 Separation of Costs into Fixed and Variable Categories ………………… 67
4.3.5 Factors Affecting CVP Analysis ………………………………………… 69
4.3.6 Factors affecting CVP the Most ………………………………………. 70
4.4 Second Objective: CVP Analysis and Related Challenges ……………… 71
4.4.1 The Use of CVP Analysis in Planning and Control …………………….. 71
4.4.2 Planning and Control Problems ………………………………………… 71
4.4.3 CVP Analysis in Long-Term Planning …………………………………. 73
4.5 Third Objective: Applicability of Breakeven Analysis in Modern Manufacturing
Firms……………………………………………………………………………. 73
4.5.1 Capital or Labour Intensive Business …………………………………….. 74
4.5.2 Price Determinants and CVP and Competition ………………………..... 75
4.5.3 CVP and Risks …………………………………………………………... 76
4.6 Objective Four: Budgeting and CVP Analysis ………………………….. 77
4.6.1 Cost Behaviour in Budgeting ………………………………………… 77
4.6.2 Monitoring With Budget ……………………………………………...... 78
4.6.3 Budgeting and the Company‟s Business Pattern …………………….... 79
4.7 Objective Five: Performance Evaluation With CVP Analysis…………… 80
4.7.1 Performance Evaluation …………………………………………………. 80
4.7.2 Bases for Performance Evaluation ………………………………….. 81
4.7.3 Effectiveness and Efficiency of CVP ………………………………. 82
4.8 Summary of Data analysis ……………………………………………...... 83
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
………………………………………………………………………………. 84
xii
5.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 84
5.1 Summary …………………………………………………………………. 84
5.2 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………….. 86
5.3 Recommendations ………………………………………………………... 88
5.3.1 Recommendations to Policy Makers …………………………………. 88
5.3.2 Recommendations to Managers ……………………………………….. 89
5.4 Areas for Future Studies ………………………………………………… 93
REFERENCES …………………………………………………………… .. 94
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE ……………………………………… 103
xiii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Profile of respondents …………………………………………….. 54
Table 2: Level of Education ………………………………………………. 62
Table 3: Work experience ………………………………………………… 64
Table 4: Factors Influencing CVP ……………………………………………. 68
Table 5: Factor Affecting CVP The Most ………………………………….. 69
Table 6: Capital or Labour Intensive Business ……………………………. .. 74
Table 7: Price Determinants and CVP and Competition …………………. 76
Table 8: Monitoring with budget …………………………………………… 78
Table 9: Performance Valuation Methods …………………………………… 80
Table 10: Bases for Performance Evaluation ………………………………… 81
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: CVP Analysis Chart ……………………………………………… 18
Figure 2: Profit Volume Chart …………………………………………….. 19
Figure 3: Conceptual Framework for Variables of the Study ………………. 47
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
ABC – Activity Based Costing
BEP – Break Even Point
CVP – Cost Volume Profit
DOL – Degree of Operating Leverage
EAC - East African Community
EVA - Economic Value Added
JIT – Just-in-Time
NPV- Net Present Value
ROI – Return on Investment
SP – selling price
SPSS – Statistical Package for Service Solution
TFC – Total Fixed Costs
TOC - Theory of Constraints
TPCC – Tanzania Portland Cement Company
TQM – Total Quality Management
UCM – Unit Contribution Margin
VC – Variable Cost
1
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
This chapter conveys the universal outline of the study on the subject of the analysis
of performance of Cost Volume Profit (CVP) analysis in manufacturing companies in
Tanzania, a case of Tanzania Portland Cement Company (TPCC). It commences by
depiction of the background to the study problem, followed by the statement of the
problem, subsequent to which it presents the research objectives and research
questions. The chapter also briefly explains the significance of the study, explaining
how important the study in knowledge is, managerial impact and contributions to
personal understanding of the researcher and scope of the study. It ends up by
presenting the limitations of the study.
1.1 Background to the Study
1.1.1 CVP Analysis; an Overview
Cost volume profit analysis is a model which is used to plan profit. The basic
assumption made is that, cost volume and profit has linear relationship. It is used to
measure the economic characteristics of manufacturing a proposed product. A critical
part of CVP analysis is the point where total revenue equals total costs (Duncan,
1996). At this break-even point (BEP), a company will experience no income or loss.
This BEP can be an initial examination that precedes more detailed CVP analysis.
Based on accounting data, the CVP model is used to determine the sales quantity
needed to break even, as well as the sales quantity required to earn a desired profit or
2
profit margin. Managers then compare a product's expected sales with the sales
quantities required to break even and/or earn a target profit margin to determine
whether the product should be produced (Duncan, 1996).
Cost-volume-profit, like all financial models, is based on a set of simplifying
assumptions that reduces the complexity of a resource allocation decision to make
decision making more tractable. These assumptions will be outlined in the literature
review chapter. To understand a financial model and its usefulness, its assumptions
and their role in a decision must be understood, that is, the reliability of the results
from CVP analysis depends on the reasonableness of the assumptions.
One of the features useful for decision making, is the ability to display the
information in different methods, one of these is the Margin of safety. This is the
difference between the expected sales and break even sales, expressed as a percentage
of the expected sales. It shows management the level that sales can fall by before the
company‟s revenue falls below the breakeven point (Researcher, 2013).
1.1.2 Economists versus Accountants view of CVP Analysis
There are many ways that CVP analysis can be useful for decision making. It is
important to distinguish between the different applications of the Economists and
Accountants interpretations, as well as other factors involved in decision making
(Lucey, 1996). The economist‟s interpretation of the CVP is based on two main
assumptions, which explain the shape of the cost and revenue curves.
The first assumption, which affects the revenue, is that the firm is competing on price
competition; this means that in order to increase sales, the firm must reduce the
3
marginal selling price of the product. This causes the firm‟s revenue curve to level
off, as the marginal revenue falls to zero (Drury, 2004).
According to Burch (1994), the second assumption is based on the firms cost,
economies and diseconomies of scale. The firm‟s economies of scale cause the
variable cost per unit to decrease as production increases. This can be due to any of
the economies of scale, such as purchasing, where a discount for bulk buying is
received, managerial, where managers can become more specialised, financial where
the firm is offered lower interest rates as there is a lower risk of lending.
It is important to understand that Economists are trying to most accurately model real
world situations, rather than create a tool for management decision. Economists argue
that lowering selling price acts as a catalyst to increasing demand and thus as sales
volumes increase so will variable costs (Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R.S. 2002).
Proponents of the accounting model argue that it is not intended to provide a precise
representation of total revenue and cost functions throughout all levels of activity.
The objective of the accountant‟s CVP model is to represent an approximation of
revenue and cost behaviour over the relevant range in the short term.
Managers may wish to extend the CVP model to cover longer term decisions. This
needs them to be aware of the long term behaviour of fixed costs. In the long term,
firms will have a greater control over fixed costs, which will give the firm‟s fixed cost
line a step function. Meigs, (1998) states that, other factors will also affect the firm‟s
revenue and cost curves, such as advertising strategies, changes in political
environments, social, economic, and legal factors, such as a change in tax rate. These
factors cannot easily be planned for and are not easily shown in long term CVP
4
analysis, which is the main reason that CVP cannot accurately model long term
production.
In the real world, firms will be producing multi products, and spreading the overhead
costs across each of these products. A firm may wish to alter the CVP analysis to
reflect their product mix. This is done by grouping production into batches. The
batches revenue and variable costs will be defined as the total of the products in the
batch (Researcher, 2013). The values for the batch are then applied to the CVP in the
same way as a single product. The Accountant‟s interpretation of the CVP analysis, as
shown by the underlying assumptions, will allow managers to develop a more
relevant understanding of the information, so that it can be used more efficiently in
decision making. If managers tried to use the economists Cost Volume Profit model,
the cost of gathering and interpreting the data would be high, as well as making the
information more difficult to understand and less reliable (Kaplan, R. and Atkinson,
A., 1998).
Thus, Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume
profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountants have a CVP model that is appropriate for
assisting management with decision making (Drury 2004).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Running a successful business requires proficient navigation of the many choices
created by an ever changing market place (Meigs, 1998). This implies that, to have a
strong and successful business, managers need to have a clear understanding of the
financial impact that the most basic business decisions may have.
5
CVP analysis is a useful forecasting as well as managerial control tool. It is one of the
fundamental financial analysis tools for ascertaining the underlying profitability of a
business. Its primary value is in highlighting the effects of different levels of activity
on profit and, combinations of fixed and variable costs of production. The model not
only incorporates these admittedly important variables but recognizes the fixed and
variable nature of capital costs (Brigham, 1995). It includes a set of problem solving
techniques and procedures, based on understanding the characteristics of company
costs evolution models. In a general sense, it provides a comprehensive financial
overview of the planning process (Horngren, Datar, and Foster, 1994). That overview
allows managers to examine the possible impacts of a wide range of strategic
decisions. And such decisions can include crucial areas such as pricing policies,
product mixes, market expansions or contractions, outsourcing contracts, idle plant
usage, discretionary expense planning and a variety of other important considerations
in the planning process (Horngren et al, 1994).
The CVP analysis is useful in taking decisions related to installing manufacturing
capacity and selling prices taking in to consideration that different levels of
manufacturing capacity display different structure of fixed and variable components
of manufacturing cost, and the impact of difference between selling price and variable
cost on contribution for recovering the fixed costs and making profit (Drury, 2004).
However, the consequence of identifying and interpreting the underlying assumptions
of Cost Volume Profit (CVP) analysis rest on the practical application of it. When
CVP was developed, manufacturing firms had different cost structures than modern
manufacturing firms. Modern firms have a higher level of costs that remain constant
6
with changes in output, partly because modern firms are more capital intensive, and
partly because most of their labor cost is fixed (Johnson, H. Thomas, 1981). And cost
structures vary extensively among industries and between firms within an industry.
In addition, an organization‟s cost structure has a substantial effect on the sensitivity
of its profits to changes in volume. Operating leverage describes the extent to which
an organization‟s cost structure is made up of fixed costs. Operating leverage can
vary within an industry as well as between industries (Researcher, 2013).
Furthermore, as the manufacturing environment changes, business cost structure also
changes, the conventional cost behavior based on single action shows narrow-minded,
and the basic assumptions also limits the practical application of CVP analysis. CVP
is perceived to be a one-period model of a product's profitability, (Mc Waters et al,
2001) although the product may have an economic life of several years.
Likewise, there are factors that influence the changes in management accounting
practices within some organisations. Otley and Berry (1980) made reference to some
systems as open, that is, there is a continuous cycle of resources that are inputs which
moves from the external environment. It is a common belief that such changes will
have an influence on the selection of the appropriate management accounting
practices within any organisation. Some researchers have commented that such
changes may originate due to different settings of both economic and cultural
environments. Most of the research focused on changes in management accounting
practices, primarily in countries such as South Africa and Canada (e.g Luther &
Longden, 2001). Nevertheless, some researchers noted what is often taught in schools
is far different in the world of work and therefore creates a breach in knowledge
7
between the practical and the theory. Johnson and Kaplan (1987) argued that
management accounting has not changed over the past years. But, Libby and
Waterhouse (1996) were convinced that there were changes. Burns et al. (1999)
further argued that there is evidence that management accounting practices have
changed over the last decade in a developed country such as the United Kingdom.
There are some published reports in Africa such as “Cost Information and Strategic
Planning in the Egyptian Private Sector” written by Mohamed Elshahat in 2006. On
his report Mohamed (2006) explained a little on CVP as a tool for decision making
with its weaknesses and some more published in developed countries. But, currently
there is no any published report in Tanzania talking anything on CVP as a model for
decision making and there is no research study conducted on this issue. So
specifically, this study desires to understand how efficient Cost Volume Profit
analysis, in helping managers to is make decisions which, in turn, enable the
manufacturing business to face the challenges caused by the ever changing business
environment particularly in Tanzania, as well as it would help the policy makers to
make some relevant policies in this aspect.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.3.1 General Objective
Main purpose of this study is to determine if CVP can assist management in
formulating pricing policies by projecting the effect of different price structures on
cost and profit and to highlight the usefulness of CVP analysis in manufacturing
companies in Tanzania.
8
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
The specific objectives of this study are as follows:
1. To identify the factors affecting CVP analysis
2. To determine the challenges facing manufacturing companies when using
CVP analysis for decision making
3. To determine the relevance of CVP in modern manufacturing firm‟s decision
making.
4. To find out if CVP analysis is helpful in setting up flexible budget which
indicates cost at various levels of activities.
5. To find out if CVP analysis is useful in evaluating performance for the
purpose of control.
1.4 Research Questions
1. What are the factors affecting CVP analysis?
2. What are the challenges facing manufacturing companies when using CVP
analysis for decision making?
3. Is CVP analysis relevant to modern manufacturing firm‟s decision making?
4. What is the contribution of CVP in setting up flexible budget?
5. Can CVP assist in evaluating performance for the purpose of control?
1.5 Significance of the Study
CVP analysis is an important theory in modern management accounting. This
analysis provides useful information for decision-making in the management of a
company. But its conclusions are made in some strict assumptions, and we cannot be
sure that the conclusions are also set up in real environment. Those simplifications
9
and restrictions impinge on the reality and relevance of the analytical model, so
attempts to improve them will involve releasing some of their underlying assumptions
or broadening their scope.
Because in the modern environment of business, a business administration must act
and take decisions in a fast and accurate manner, gaining a better understanding of
costs and volume via CVP analysis can assist management in locating areas of
potential efficiency improvements. Thus studying whether the CVP conclusions are
justifiable in real environment will be worth for business policies formulation and
personal career improvement to researcher.
1.6 Scope of the Study
CVP is an important financial analysis that helps managers to deal with their routine
problems as well as strategic issues in the course of carrying out their business
activities. Such issues can come up when preparing company budgets, financial plans
or when new sales promotions and other functional decisions are taken. It evaluates
what-if situations that occur in the business.
CVP analysis has wider scope in various managerial decisions making. Various cost
accounting models have been developed within this broad decision framework such
as breakeven analysis, transfer pricing systems and mathematical programming
methods for choosing optimal sales mix and the optimal extend of processing joint
products. Initially all CVP models were deterministic, assuming demand and cost
structures to be known with certainty. However, following the significant
development in the area of economic decision making uncertainty, attempts have
been made to relax the certainty assumption of CVP models.
10
The following are the benefits (functions) of CVP in business;
It is helpful in setting up flexible budgets which indicates cost at various
levels of activities. It assists managers in determining the quantity of products
to be produced to attain desired profits, the quantity of products to be
produced at maximum threshold level, attaining desired profit under different
costs and volume relationship.
In order to ascertain profits accurately, it is essential to ascertain the
relationship between cost and profit on one hand and volume on the other.
CVP analysis helps the business to know its most profitable product(s) or
service(s) among various that the business offers in the market. This aids the
management to focus more on profitable products compared to others. It also
supports the form to know the impact of any variance, due to any reason, on
the profits.
CVP analysis assists in evaluating performance for the purpose of control. It
enables the firm to understand the level of fluctuations it can afford in its
selling price. Whenever firms increase their selling price to increase sales they
must know the new level of sales they have to meet to sustain the desired
profits. It is also essential for the firm to know the bare basic prices(s) that
must be charged for its products from its customer and how to cover any
increase in fixed costs that may arise.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
It is important to mention a few limitations of this study before any conclusion may
be drawn.
11
The study was subject to the normal limitations related with survey research. CVP
analysis is used to provide information for internal reporting purposes. This led to
response bias due to the unwillingness of the respondents to share the accurate
information on the ground of confidentiality. Some of the responses may have been
influenced by the problems of questions understanding and misinterpretation which
resulted in data analysis difficulties.
All research designs can be discussed in terms of their relative strengths and
limitations. The merits of a particular design are inherently related to the rationale for
selecting it as the most appropriate plan for addressing the research problem. The
researcher selected a case study design because of the nature of the research problem.
The case study is basically been faulted for its lack of representativeness and
therefore it involves problems on the issues of reliability, validity, and
generalizability. This is because a case study focuses on a single unit, a single
instance.
Time and budget were also among the limiting factors of this study. This was a self-
sponsored research; therefore the costs associated with the whole study were incurred
by the researcher. Thus the researcher was subject to financial constraints and time
for data collection and analysis.
1.8 Conclusion
This chapter has offered the broad preface of the whole study. It began by giving a
range of aspects with high regard to the idea Cost Volume Profit analysis, contracted
downward to the subject of applicability. Within the problem it has demonstrated how
the interpretation of strict assumptions of CVP analysis impinge on the application of
12
the model and, for this reason the purpose to discover the efficiency of the model in
manufacturing business. In winding up the chapter, the importance, scope and
limitations of the study are specified.
13
CHAPTER TWO
LITERTURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This chapter is dedicated to a review of the most important theoretical, empirical and
critical literature related to the issues of CVP analysis as a planning and control tool
for mangers. Basically, CVP analysis is considered to be the powerful tool mangers
have at their hands for planning and control of the operations of their organizations.
There have been many studies on CVP for decision making as used in organizations a
long time ago. Nevertheless, these studies have not been telling us how competent is
the model in providing managers with the information they require particularly in the
changing business environment.
This chapter has five major parts. The first part discusses the theoretical framework of
CVP analysis. The key terms and assumptions underlying the study as well as its
pictorial presentations are also presented. The second party discusses the empirical
literature review of CVP analysis as used in the planning process in the changing
business environment and the recent tendencies of management thinking basing on
the objectives of the study followed by highlights the conceptual framework of the
study.
14
2.1 Theoretical Review of Literature
2.1.1 The Concept of Cost Volume Profit (CVP) Analysis
CVP analysis is a systematic method of examining the relationship between changes
in activity (that is, output) and changes in total sales revenue, expenses and net profit
(Drury, 2004). It is a mathematical representation of the economics of producing a
product. The relationships between a product's revenue and cost functions expressed
within the CVP model are used to evaluate the financial implications of a wide range
of strategic and operational decisions. Cost-Volume-Profit analysis is a planning tool
which is extremely useful in predicting sales and profit levels given a certain cost
structure (Burch, 1994). Traditional CVP analysis has been applied largely to
manufacturing enterprises which have a tangible product base (for example,
furniture). However, the concept itself is applicable to service enterprises such as
banking, insurance and other financial service industries.
As mentioned earlier, Cost-Volume-Profit analysis, or breakeven analysis as it is
often commonly called, is used largely in the manufacturing sector. According to
Horngren et al (1997), the basic CVP model has the following underlying
assumptions:
1. The behavior of costs and revenues is linear.
2. Selling prices are constant.
3. All costs can be divided into their fixed and variable elements.
4. Total fixed costs remain constant.
15
5. Total variable costs are proportional to volume.
6. Prices of production inputs (for instance, materials) are constant.
7. Efficiency and productivity are constant.
8. The analysis covers a single product or a constant sales mix.
9. Volume is the only driver of costs.
2.1.2 Definitions of Key Terms
The main variables involved in the empirical study to the extent that our study is
concerned are as follows;
2.1.2.1 Cost
In business, cost is usually a monetary valuation of effort, material, resources, time
and utilities consumed, risks incurred, and opportunity forgone in production and
delivery of a good or service. Cost is a sacrifice of resources incurred for a future
benefit or objective (Kapil, 2011). The resources sacrificed are in form of cash or
cash equivalents. It is a resource sacrificed or forgone to achieve a specific objective
(Horngren et al., 1997).
2.1.2.2 Volume
The quantity or number of goods sold or services sold in the normal operations of a
company in a specified (Baumol, 1972). It is the level at which something is heard or
the amount of space that something takes up.
16
2.1.2.3 Profit
The word profit has different meaning to different people. In a general sense profit is
regarded as income accruing to the equity holders (Dwivedi, 2008). To an accountant,
profit means the excess of revenue over all paid-out costs including both
manufacturing and overhead expenses. Economists define profit as a return over and
above the opportunity cost, that is, the income which a businessman might expect
from the second best alternative use of his resources.
2.1.2.4 Break-Even Point (BEP)
The break-even point has its origins in the economic concept of the point of
indifference. From an economic perspective, this point indicates the quantity of some
good at which the decision maker would be indifferent (Dwivedi, 2008) (that is,
would be satisfied without reason to celebrate or to opine). At this quantity, the costs
and benefits are precisely balanced.
Break-even point is where both revenue and costs are equal (Duncan, 1996). It is a
starting point for planning purposes. If sales volume extends beyond break-even point
and if there is positive contribution, each additional unit sold will contribute to profit
at a rate which is equal to unit contribution margin. If sales volume will be below
break-even point, sales volume will not cover annual fixed costs.
BEP = Total fixed costs (TFC)
Unit contribution margin (UCM)
Unit contribution margin = Unit selling price (SP)-Variable cost per unit (VC)
17
2.1.2.5 Margin of Safety
A margin of safety is the difference between break even sales and planned sales. This
difference indicates the degree to which the business is safe from operating at a level
that will result in loss (Drury, 2004).
2.1.2.6 Degree of Operating Leverage
Managers decide how to structure the cost function for their organizations. Often,
potential trade-offs are made between fixed and variable costs. One of the major
disadvantages of fixed costs is that they may be difficult to reduce quickly if activity
levels fail to meet expectations, thereby increasing the organization‟s risk of incurring
losses.
The degree of operating leverage is the extent to which the cost function is made up
of fixed costs (Scarlett, 2005). Organizations with high operating leverage incur more
risk of loss when sales decline. Conversely, when operating leverage is high an
increase in sales (once fixed costs are covered) contributes quickly to profit.
A manager can use the DOL to quickly estimate what impact various percentage
changes in sales will have on profits, without the necessity of preparing detailed
income statements.
The formula for operating leverage is
Degree of operating leverage (DOL) = Contribution margin
Net operating income
18
2.1.3 Cost Volume Profit Chart
The information obtained from planning using CVP model may be depicted using the
CVP chart and profit volume chart. Unfortunately none of the two charts succeeds to
show the three parameters of cost, volume and profit in the same chart. We can
therefore prepare both of them so that they can complement one another.
The CVP chart shows the volume of sales on the horizontal axis and the cost and
revenue in the vertical axis as follows;
Figure 1: CVP Analysis Chart
Revenue/cost Total revenue
BEP Profit Total cost
Variable costs
Loss Fixed costs
0 Output
2.1.3.1 Profit Volume Chart
Profit volume chart shows how the volume change influences profit change. When we
examine the CVP chart we find that it does not show this relationship directly. In this
chart x-axis stands for volume of sales and y-axis stands for profit. If sales are zero,
loss will be equal to annual fixed costs.
19
Figure 2: Profit Volume Chart
Profit/loss
BEP Profit
0 Output
Loss
2.1.4 Theories Related to CVP
CVP analysis is based on the assumption of a linear total cost function (constant unit
variable cost and constant fixed costs) and so is an application of marginal costing
principles. It is based on the principle of separating variable costs from fixed costs
according to behaviour change in production volume, and is charging only variable
costs (marginal costs) on products whether they are direct or indirect. Lucey (2003)
defines marginal costing as „the accounting system in which variable costs are
charged to cost units and fixed costs of the period are written-off in full against the
aggregate contribution‟.
According to Variable costing provides relevant information for the management
team, and is useful in formulating economic entity's business decisions for the next
period. This method will provide a basis for cost estimates to study the effects of
planned changes in production volume, resulting from changes in economic
20
conditions or open some management actions such as price changes, increase or
decrease in stocks or special promotional activity.
Briefly, the following are the theories which provide the base or supports CVP
analysis:-
2.1.4.1 Theory of Cost
The theory of cost is the model which is most related to CVP. The theory of cost
deals with the behaviour of cost in relation to a change in output (cost-outputs
relation). The basic principle of the cost behaviour is that the total cost increases with
increase in output (Dwivedi, 2008). Such an unassuming statement of a witnessed
fact is of slight theoretical and practical importance. What is significant from a
theoretical and managerial idea of understanding is not the absolute increase in the
total cost but the direction of change in the average cost.
So the method focuses on boosting sales in that size does not allocate fixed costs on
inventory (unfinished products, finished products), but must be covered by the sales
of the period. Also the emphasis is on analysis and attribution of the fixed costs and
attributing the variable costs on the gross margin (Lucey, 1996).The manager has the
obligation to return and maximize margin on variable costs over which fixed costs
will be charged. The margin on variable costs, also called gross profit or contribution
limit is determined as the difference between gross turnover and variable costs
associated with the entire production sold (Vickers, 1997).
21
The margin of variable costs is also called the global margin and it is the sum total
margins on variable costs per product unit set multiplied by the associated production
sold. The unit margin can be determined as the difference between the selling price
and the unit variable cost of product (Scarlett, 2005).
CVP analysis is also predicated on the notion that, in the short run, a relationship
exists between volume, sales revenue, costs and profit. The “short run” in this regard
is a period of one year or less. And during this period, the organization's current
operating capacity becomes the main factor that restricts its output (Robert et al.,
2004). Though some of the organization's inputs can be increased in the short run,
others cannot. For example, it can take a long time to expand the capacity of the
organization's plant and machinery even though additional supplies of unskilled labor
and materials may be obtained on short notice (McWatters, et al., 2011).
Hence, given that the organization's plant facilities cannot be expanded in the short
run, its output will be limited in that period (Meigs, 1998). Furthermore,
organizations may be compelled to operate on relatively constant stock of production
resources in the short run because it also takes time to reduce capacity. In this regard,
sales volume becomes the major area of uncertainty for the affected organizations
because most of the costs and prices for their products will have already been
determined. The implication of this is that organizations‟ short-run profits are most
sensitive to sales volume. A CVP analysis reveals how this sales volume affects
short-run profits (Meigs, 1998).
22
The variation of the conventional CVP model provides more useful information to
management because it focuses on more than operating expenses and sales revenues.
Financial managers have long recognized the importance of including cost of capital
and business risk variables in capital budgeting decisions (Brigham, 1995). Our
model not only incorporates these admittedly significant variables but identifies the
fixed and variable character of capital costs.
The understanding of this theory led the researcher to develop the questions, which,
when responded helped her to conclude whether CVP analysis incorporates more than
costs and revenues when used in decision making (Researcher, 2013).
2.1.4.2 Theory of Production
This is the most basic theory in economics which was developed by Adam Smith and
David Ricardo in the late 18th century. Production theory is a theory which deals with
quantitative relationship, that is, technical and technological relations between input
and output. It also clarifies under what circumstances costs increases or decreases,
how total output behaves when all units of one factor (input) are increased keeping
other factors constant or when all factors are simultaneously changing. How can
output be maximized from a given quantity of resources and how can the optimum
size of output be determined are also the main concern of production theory
(Stewart, 1991).
An input is a good or service that goes into the process of production and output is
any good or service that comes out of production (Dwivedi, 2008). Production
process requires a wide variety of inputs depending on the nature of product. Inputs
23
are categorized as fixed inputs and variable inputs. Theoretically, a fixed factor is one
that remains constant (fixed) for a certain level of output. And a variable input is the
one that changes with the change in output.
This theory enabled the researcher, in the course of her study, try to find out and
come up with the proof of whether CVP analysis is applicable only for short-term
decisions or not (Researcher, 2013).
2.1.4.3Pricing Theory
This theory was developed by Alfred Marshall in the early 20th
century and was
supported by other economists such as David Ricardo and Adam Smith. Price theory
has always been at the heart of economic theory and profit maximization has been the
most important assumption on which economists have built price and production
theories. This assumption has however, been strongly questioned and alternative
hypothesis suggested. Price theory explains how price is determined under different
kinds of market conditions; when price discrimination is desirable, feasible and
profitable; and to what extend advertising can be helpful in expanding sales in a
competitive market (Dwivedi, 2008). Thus price theory can be supportive in
determining the price policy of the firm. Price and production theories together, in
fact assist in shaping the optimum size of the firm.
Therefore, this study also took into consideration the statement given by Kaplan and
Atkinson in 1998, stating that “If managers tried to use the economists Cost Volume
Profit model, the cost of gathering and interpreting the data would be high, as well as
making the information more difficult to understand and less reliable”.
24
2.1.4.4 Theory of the Firm
The economic question of the firm is old. Adam Smith discussed firms in The Wealth
of Nations (1776) and established that they, in the sense of "manufactures," were
more efficient in producing than individual, self-employed craftsmen and labour
workers. Managerial theories of the firm, as developed by William Baumol (1959 and
1962), is microeconomic concept founded in neoclassical economics that states that
firms (corporations) exist and make decisions in order to maximize profits.
Businesses interact with the market to determine pricing and demand and then
allocate resources according to models that look to maximize net profits (Baumol,
1959).
The concept of a business model facilitates analysis of the way in which a firm
derives economic value from a newly developed technology. Indeed Chesbrough and
Rosenbloom (2002) have argued that it is the business model adopted, more so than
the technology itself, which is critical to the success of the commercialisation of new
technology. The concept is concerned with how the firm defines its competitive
strategy through the design of the product or service it offers to its market, how it
charges for it and what it costs to produce. How it differentiates itself from other
firms by the nature of its value proposition. It also describes how the firm integrates
its own value chain with that of other firms in the industry‟s value networks.
The review of this theory assisted the researcher to impose questions which helped
her to determine whether CVP analysis is still relevant in this dynamic and
competitive world of business.
25
2.1.4.5 Theory of Constraints
The Theory of Constraints (TOC) is a series of decision making techniques first
created by Dr. Eliyahu M. Goldratt beginning around 1980 and later applied and
augmented by a number of others. An earlier propagator of the concept was Wolfgang
Mewes
in Germany with publications on power-oriented management theory
(Machtorientierte Führungstheorie, 1963). There are several works which provide
reviews of TOC's history and development its major components applications
(Noreen et al, 1995;), and published literature (Mabin and Balderstone, 1999).
The Theory of Constraints has been applied to production planning, production
control, project management, supply chain management, accounting and performance
measurement, and other areas of business as well as such not-for-profit facilities as
hospitals and military depots ((Goldratt, 2008). It has also been applied to decision
making in educational settings.
The Theory of Constraints states that constraints determine the performance of a
system. A constraint is anything that prevents a system from achieving a higher
performance relative to its goal (Schleier, 2010). The Theory of Constraints was first
applied to business systems. Dr. Goldratt defines the goal of a for-profit business as to
make more money now and in the future. This definition is in keeping with the
traditional definition of the goal of a business which is to maximize the owners‟ or
stockholders‟ wealth. Constraints may be resource constraints such as a person or
department that cannot keep up with market demand (Goldratt, 1995).
The Theory of Constraints is perhaps the most advanced operations management
philosophy in existence (Goldratt, 2008). Its usefulness has been widely proven. It has
26
been used in conjunction with Lean and Total Quality Management and may help to
focus these initiatives on the organization‟s constraints to increase their impact.
The importance of this theory is on finding out if CVP analysis can incorporate all
relevant factors which affect business in decision making.
2.1.5 Factors Affecting Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost-volume-profit analysis involves a study of various factors that affect profit and a
study of their interrelationship. It is a technique used for measuring the functional
relationships between the major factors affecting profits; and for determining the
profit structure of the firm. It is used to determine how changes in costs and volume
affect a company's operating income and net income (Saxena and Vashist, 2007).
Therefore the key factors that affect the profit of a business are the ones which affect
CVP analysis. Such factors are the selling price of the products, volume of sales and
cost of production.
2.1.5.1 Basic Constituents
CVP analysis consists of five basic constituents that include: volume or level of
activity, unit selling price, variable cost per unit, total fixed cost, and sales mix. Cost-
Volume-Profit Analysis also consists of the CVP income statement, break-even
analysis, margin of safety, target net income and changes in business environment.
These components are vital to determining the success of a company through profit
margins (Lecture notes).
The five basic components interdepend based on well thought out assumptions in a
CVP analysis. The level of activity shows the costs and revenues display relevance in
27
range in activity, activity levels are displayed as diverse dimension bases in a
company. The variable cost per unit is determined by dividing the change in total cost
by the high minus low activity level. Total fixed costs remain the same and do not
change as activity may change. The sales mix indicates a combination of products
sold in a CVP (Saxena et al., 2007). The five basic components help define profit in a
CVP analysis.
2.1.5.2 Income Statement
Aside from the five basic components of a CVP analysis, there are many other
important factors that display a company‟s success. A CVP income statement
evaluates costs and expenses in a period and also reports the contribution margin. In a
CVP analysis there is a break even analysis that determines a point where total
revenues equal total costs, also known as the break-even point. The break-even point
can be found using a mathematical equation, finding the point on a CVP graph or
simply by using the contribution margin technique (Scarlett, 2005).
A margin of safety is also displayed, which is the amount of sales at a break-even
point and the actual or expected sales for the company. According to Robert et al.,
(2004), the income is projected for certain products, this is known as the target net
income. The Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis then closes with reporting changes in the
business environment and revisits the CVP income statement to review profit analysis
and projections over a period of time.
28
2.1.5.3 Contribution Margin
Another important aspect of a Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis is the contribution
margin. The contribution margin is the revenue remaining after deducting variable
costs. McWatters, et al. (2011) states that if the unit selling price increases, the
contribution margin per unit will decrease provided the unit variable costs remain the
same and do not also rise. If the unit variable costs rise with the selling costs, the
contribution margin might remain the same or may not show as much of an increase.
Contribution margin ratios are sometimes more preferred in a CVP analysis. A
contribution margin ratio is a percentage of sales contributing to a company‟s net
income. The contribution margin per unit divided by the unit selling price gives out
the contribution margin ratio (Magee, 1975). If one of the components of the
contribution margin ratio changes, the company‟s net income will also change. If the
sales increase, then the net income will increase. By the sales increasing, the unit
selling price can be decreased and increase the contribution margin to the company.
The contribution margin can improve the net income of the company but is very
dependent on the sales of a company. There are many factors that determine the net
income of a company, and the main factors are all displayed in a Cost-Volume-Profit
Analysis income statement (Magee, 1975).
2.1.5.4 Fixed Costs
Fixed costs are another factor to consider in a Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis. Fixed
cost by itself does not increase or decrease, but a fixed cost per unit may show a
change in rates. If the fixed price per unit decreases then the items produced will
decrease, and the sales of the item will be lowered until there is no more of the
29
product to sale (Luther, et al., 1998). The decline in the production of candy canes
will eventually thin out to nothing. A change in fixed costs can alter the sale of a
product from any company.
2.1.6 Challenges Facing Manufacturing Companies When Using CVP Analysis
for Decision Making
The challenges facing decision makers in the practical application of CVP relate to its
basic underlying assumptions. Economists (Vickers, 1997; Machlup, 1955) have been
predominantly critical of those assumptions. Their disapprovals take various forms,
but they all arise from CVP's departures from the ordinary supply and demand models
in price theory economics.
2.1.6.1 Linearity of Total Revenue and Total Cost Schedule
Possibly the most basic dissimilarity between CVP analysis and price theory models
is that CVP disregards the curvilinear nature of total revenue and total cost schedules.
Consequently, it assumes that changes in volume have no effect on elasticity of
demand or on the efficiency of production factors. Managerial accountants recognize
these economic critiques, but they believe nonetheless that CVP analysis is a very
useful initial analysis of strategic decisions (Horngren et al., 1994).
2.1.6.2 Similarities to Standard Economic Model
The supplementary condemnations of the underlying nature of CVP analysis stems
from its similarities to standard economic models, rather than its differences. Alike to
standard economic price theory models, basic CVP analysis usually assumes, among
other things, the following: single-stage, single-product manufacturing processes;
30
simple production functions with one causal variable; cost categories limited to only
variable or fixed; and data and production functions vulnerable to certainty
predictions (Chen et al, 2002). Further, CVP analysis is naturally restricted to one
time period in each case.
The shortcomings of CVP look like discouraging, but CVP is flexible enough to
overcome them all, if necessary and appropriate. Nonlinear and stochastic CVP
models involving multistage, multi-product, multivariate, or multi-period frameworks
are all possible, although a single model embracing all of those extensions would
appear a fundamental departure from the entire idea of CVP analysis, its basic
simplicity (Schneider, 1992). Universally, the durability and reputation of CVP
analysis definitely reflects the willingness of its users to "live with" the shortcomings
revealed by criticisms of its basic nature.
2.1.6.3 Focus on Revenue and Operating Expenses
The main concern lies on restricted focus of CVP on only sales revenue and operating
expenses. That drawback can leave some very significant aspects of strategic
decisions overlooked. Schneider (1992), for example, suggests that the scope of CVP
analysis ought to be widened to include the impact of managerial compensation
schemes on target profit levels. CVP does not measure the impact of the decision on
wealth, it does not incorporate the effect of asset structure changes required by the
decision and it does not acknowledge the risk created by the decision (Magee, 1975).
Some fairly simple extensions of the scope of the basic model can do much to
improve the shortcomings caused by those limitations.
31
2.1.6.4 Wealth Impacts of CVP Decisions
The first restriction of the basic CVP model that should be addressed is the
nonexistence of any dimension of a decision's impact on wealth. The existing CVP
model focuses on the total level of net profits produced by a decision, which may or
may not increase the wealth of the firm (Dwivedi, 2008). The decisive effect of a
specific decision upon wealth rests on the investment in assets necessary to
implement that decision. Though it would possibly be ideal to capture wealth effects
through present value analyses, the main improvement of CVP analysis, its relative
simplicity, would be lessened by the added complexities of present value techniques.
A simpler way to incorporate wealth effects in the CVP model would be to include
the firm's cost of capital in the analysis (Dwivedi, 2008).
2.1.7 CVP Analysis and the Modern Manufacturing Firms
2.1.7.1 Cost Structure
When CVP was developed, manufacturing firms had different cost structures than
modern manufacturing firms. Modern firms have a higher level of costs that remain
constant with changes in output, partly because modern firms are more capital
intensive, and partly because most of their labor cost is fixed. For example, the
supervisor of a machine is paid the same salary if the machine is running at 50% or
75%. Many authors (Kaplan et al., 1998) argue that traditional views of maximizing
contribution are no longer relevant.
32
2.1.7.2 Technology and Competition
In recent years particularly after the wide spread increase of technology in many
sectors, numerous firms have entered the market intending to take high percentage of
the market share. Consequently to compete more in the introduction market some
firms increase their sales regardless of the high price. They sell more at low price to
achieve progress in addition to reducing the inventory of some kinds of products.
According to Mc Watters et al., (2001), in most markets if you want to sell more, you
must lower your sale price. Assuming that one can sell very large quantity at a
constant price is unrealistic. CVP analysis has no explicit assumption of a constraint
in production or sales. The assumption of a constant sales price is probably accurate
only over a narrow range of output levels (Researcher, 2013).
Since its introduction in the 19th century, CVP analysis concept has been used,
enhanced, adjusted and extended in an attempt to reduce or correct for its limitations
and make it applicable to more and more business situations Vickers, (1997).
Hongren et al (2000) asserts that, inspite of its limitations and criticisms, cost-
volume-profit analysis continues to be considered as one of the best ways to focus on
the relationship between cost, volume and profitability.
2.1.7.3 Strategic Planning
Horngren et al. (2000) note that firms across a variety of industries have found the
simple CVP model to be helpful in both strategic and long-run planning decisions.
Furthermore, a survey of management accounting practices indicates that CVP
analysis is one of the most widely used techniques (Garg et al., 2003). However,
Horngren et al. (2000) warn that, in situations where revenue and cost are not
33
adequately represented by the simplifying assumption of CVP analysis, managers
should consider more sophisticated approaches to financial analysis.
2.1.8 Budgeting and CVP Analysis
Business prepares long-term plans and these are transformed into financial plans that
indicate what needs to be done and the financial resources required in accomplishing
it. Budgeting therefore transforms the plan of action into statistics. The budgeting
process is an important piece of the business planning process. It provides managers
with the opportunity to carefully match the goals of the organization with the
resources necessary to accomplish those goals. A well thought-out budget gives the
company a numeric picture of potential income, expenses and profitability (Scarlett,
2005).
According to Bhattacharyya (2011), Cost-volume-profit analysis is helpful in setting
up flexible budget which indicates cost at various levels of activities. A flexible
budget shows budgeted revenue, costs and profits for different levels of business
activity. Thus a flexible budget can be used to evaluate the efficiency of departments
throughout the business even if the actual level of business activity differs from
management's original estimates (McWatters, et al. (2011). The amounts included in a
flexible budget at any given level of activity are based on cost-volume-profit
relationships.
The flexible budget responds to changes in activity, and may provide a better tool for
performance evaluation. It is driven by the expected cost behavior. Fixed factory
34
overhead is the same no matter the activity level, and variable costs are a direct
function of observed activity.
A good financial model works in much the same fashion as flight simulator, allowing
an organization to test the interactions of decisions and economic variables in variety
settings (Hilton et al, 2003). He further argues that financial models should be
designed to have the following characteristics and objectives; (1) Usefulness for
decision making, (2) Accurate and reliable simulator of relevant factors and relations
and (3) Flexible and responsive analysis.
2.1.9 CVP as Performance Evaluation Tool
Performance evaluation has been identified as an important function of management
accounting (Emmanuel et al., 1990). Managers develop a group of measures that
identify changes in performance quality so that employees can determine what needs
to be done to improve performance
Cost management tools are essential to exert control over cost and to appraise
managerial performance in different segments of an organization particularly in
manufacturing organizations. Paulo, (2002) asserts that CVP analyses are useful for
planning and monitoring operations and for motivating employee performance.
Budgets are updated continuously to accommodate management‟s need for
performance evaluation in some settings such as just-in-time (JIT) or total quality
management (TQM) environments (Drury, 2004). This helps managers determine,
very specifically, what the future will hold if variables are altered. For instance,
35
transportation expenses and costs for materials can change. These variable costs can
affect the bottom line. CVP analysis allows the manager to plug in variable costs to
establish an idea of future performance, within a range of possibilities.
Profit analysis refers to the techniques used to generate an overall performance
evaluation from the financial perspective. It is a broader level of analysis than the
standard cost variance analysis for manufacturing costs and includes those variances
as well as several others. It is usually based on a comparison of the actual data with
the budget, but the actual data for the current period can also be compared with the
actual data from a previous period (Lucey, 1996).
Managers constantly monitor existing operations of their organizations to find out if
they would achieve the desired levels of profit. For this purpose, a number of tools are
available; one such tool is Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis (Emmanuel et al.,
1990).
When performance evaluation is based on a static budget, there is little incentive to
drive sales and production above anticipated levels because increases in volume tend
to produce more costs and unfavorable variances (Lucey, 1996). The flexible budget-
based performance evaluation provides a remedy for this phenomenon.
2.2 Empirical Literature Review
Countries with emerging economies suffer at times from the effects of political and
economic events which leave their businesses in a state of uncertainty. Within these
variables which are reflected in the price of the product or service and consequently
in the result, that is profit. To best administrate businesses in this scenario they must
36
be equipped with more efficient administrative controls which minimise the risk for
investment.
Magdy Abdel-Kader (University of Essex) and Robert Luther (University of the West
of England, Bristol) in their study on Management accounting practices in the UK
food and drinks industry in 2006 concluded that Cost Volume Profit analysis is most
frequently used in short-term decisions.
According to the study conducted by Syed Maqbool-ur-Rehman, (2011) entitled
“which management accounting techniques influence profitability in the
manufacturing sector of Pakistan?” it was found that Budgeting with a mean score of
4.42 (out of a maximum score value of 5) remained the most used and practiced
management accounting technique followed by Cost Volume Profit analysis. And An
Exploratory Study of Management Accounting Practices in Manufacturing
Companies in Barbados done by Philmore Alleyne in 2011 showed that the frequency
of use of CVP analysis is 67%.
These studies were most concerned with profitability influence and frequency of
usage, but they did not consider the limitations on applicability and relevancy of the
model in the rapid technological changing business environment (Researcher, 2013).
The Comparative Analysis of Management Accounting Practices in Australia and
Japan: An Empirical Investigation channelled in 1999 by H. Wijewardena and A. De
Zoysa, came out with results indicating that CVP analysis is the second important
technique in Japan and fifth in Australia. The ranking of importance indicates that the
37
Australian companies placed heavier emphasis on budgets, historical accounting
statements and standard costing while Japanese companies concentrated more heavily
on target costing, cost-volume-profit analysis and budgets.
Toomas Haldma and Kertu Lääts in their study on “Influencing contingencies on
management accounting practices in Estonian manufacturing companies” (2002)
asserted that Variable costing with the cost-volume-profit analysis offered a
convenient and more objective way to get an idea about the cost formation process in
manufacturing, to fix the price ranges and to realise an active pricing policy.
Manoj Anand, B.S. Sahay and Subhashish Saha 2005 in their empirical study on Cost
Management Practices in India found that The most widely used management tool is
cost-volume-profit analysis (77.3%) with reference to 65 percent adoption rate
finding of Joshi, 2001).
It was found that Break Even analysis could be applied in production planning and
control of manufacturing firms even where it is a multi-product firm. This is in line
with the studies of Ndaliman and Bala (2007) and the assertion of Nweze (1992).
These studies indicate that Break Even or CVP is applicable in many situations. The
other finding is that a relationship exists between the applications of break-even
analysis in production planning and control and the frequency with which due
dates/schedules are met by the firm.
In the study conducted in Nigeria by Ann I. Ogbo, Christopher Chukwudi Orga and
Adibe, T.N in 2012 with the title “Improving Production Planning and Control
38
through the Application of Breakeven Analysis in Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria”;
the results and findings suggest that multi- product firms can apply breakeven
analysis to great advantage. The single product firms can easily apply breakeven
analysis in production planning and control. Manufacturing firms in Enugu Urban
that apply breakeven analysis in production planning and control were more likely to
be profitable. Also such firms were more likely to meet due dates/schedules.
Manufacturing firms that apply breakeven analysis in production planning and control
were less likely to generate scraps. Most mass industries do not consciously engage in
breakeven analysis as a production planning and control tool.
Although it is nearly impossible to eliminate scrap and rework completely, they can
be reduced by optimizing the way product data are documented, reviewing
manufacturing processes and communicating manufacturing and engineering changes
throughout the supply chain. If priority is given to evaluating and improving
manufacturing processes, it becomes much easier to reduce the amount of scrap and
rework in the organization (Researcher, 2013).
It is clear to the company that understanding how costs behave is absolutely key to
making good decisions that affect market share analysis, annual budget preparation
and monitoring of results, sales volume and business mix decisions, pricing policies,
and cost management. According to the study done in Africa (Egypt) by Mohamed
(2006), as fixed costs in manufacturing organizations increase, and the economy
continues to shift more and more to service and e-commerce organizations, this fixed
cost emphasis has a significant effect on the decision-making process. When costs are
fixed, management‟s ability to influence costs with activity level decisions is limited.
39
With variable costs, management has more flexibility to change activity levels and
thereby increase or decrease total operating cost structures.
This trend of replacing variable costs with fixed costs has an important impact on the
cost structure of an organization that is captured in the concept of operating leverage
(Researcher, 2013). C-V-P analysis is used to make important planning decisions
concerning appropriate levels of production and spending.
Knowledge of break-even levels and profit-and-loss implications of different business
scenarios are relevant if managers are to make informed decisions which ensure
survival, optimize profits, and limit risk, giving rise to a feeling of “being more in
control” when making decisions (Graham et al., 1999).
An international hotel chain undertook a project to increase the effectiveness of
decision making of its properties in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. In 1996,
company executives wanted to improve the financial planning and control decisions
of the hotel management teams. The Europe, Middle East, Africa division was
responsible at that time for approximately 240 hotels. Essentially, the executives
aimed to encourage a greater use of basic managerial accounting techniques such as
budgeting models and C-V-P analysis in order to improve the profitability of
individual hotels.
In 1995, the year before the new management focus on C-V-P analysis commenced,
the average operating profit margin in the Europe, Middle East and Africa division
was 35%. In 1998, the average operating profit margin was 39%. Although the hotel
40
executives do not believe that the new focus on C-V-P tools is the only reason for this
improvement, it has played a positive role in significantly adding to shareholder
value.
Source: Ian C. Graham and Peter J. Harris, “Development of a Profit Planning
Framework in an International Hotel Chain: A Case Study,” International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management. 1999 (Issue 5), pp. 198–204.
2.3 Knowledge Gap
Numerous studies on CVP have been undertaken in developed countries, Asian and
some countries in Africa such as Egypt, Ghana, Nigeria and South Africa.
Furthermore, the studies previously done concentrated on Management Accounting
practices and Management Accounting techniques as decisions tools. However, there
is no published report of the study undertaken in Tanzania on the problem of CVP
and related aspects. In addition, the relevancy and assistance of CVP analysis as per
previous studies seem to be questionable. Hence this study will help in reducing the
gap especially in Tanzanian manufacturing companies.
2.4 Critical Review of Literature
2.4.1 Criticisms of Studies by Researchers
CVP analysis, like other managerial accounting techniques and models, uses
accounting profitability as the primary decision criterion for evaluating resource
allocation decision. It ignores the cost of capital and treats it as if it were zero.
However, the opportunity cost of the funds invested in the assets used to manufacture
a product is a cost the same as the cost of operating resources, such as direct material,
41
labour, and overhead. The failure of CVP analysis to incorporate the cost of capital
into a product's cost function can lead to underestimating a product's cost, while
overstating its profitability.
A deficiency of managerial accounting in general and CVP analysis in particular
involves its failure to include the cost of capital as an expense. Alfred Marshall, an
English economist in the 1800s, asserted that a firm does not earn a profit until its
operating income after taxes exceeds the cost of capital used to generate the operating
income. A firm's operating profit after taxes less the cost of capital used to generate
the profit measures its economic income. In the 1990s, Stewart (1991) proposed a
similar concept he referred to as economic value added (EVA) to evaluate a firm's
performance.
A firm's stock price will increase (decrease) when it earns a rate of return higher
(lower) than its cost of capital (Stewart, 1991). Therefore, when a firm's economic
income is positive, it creates economic value for the firm's stockholders. Conversely,
when the firm's economic income is negative, it destroys economic value.
Studies of the effect of economic income, or EVA, upon a firm's profitability and
stock price returns have been somewhat mixed. Hogan and Lewis (2005), in a study
of firms adopting economic income for management compensation, found that firms
that were well-suited for the use of economic income were more profitable relative to
firms that were equally suited for the use of economic income, but chose not to adopt
it.
42
In a study of the association between economic income and stock price returns, Chen
and Dodd (1997) found that stock price returns were more highly associated with
economic income than accounting income. In a similar study, Biddle et al. (1997)
found stock price returns were more highly associated with accounting earnings than
with economic income. Additional empirical and theoretical studies of the
relationship between economic income and stock price returns are provided by Paulo
(2002), Chen and Dodd (2002), and Ferguson et al. (2005). Another major benefit of
CVP analysis is that it provides a detailed snapshot of company activity. This
includes everything from the costs needed to produce a product to the amount of the
product produced.
This helps managers determine, very specifically, what the future will hold if
variables are altered. For instance, transportation expenses and costs for materials can
change. These variable costs can affect the bottom line. CVP analysis allows the
manager to plug in variable costs to establish an idea of future performance, within a
range of possibilities. This, however, can be a disadvantage to managers who are not
detail-oriented and precise with the data they record. Projections based on cost
estimates, rather than precise numbers, can result in inaccurate projections.
2.4.2 Criticisms of CVP
Maximum condemnations of CVP arise from its basic underlying assumptions.
Economists (Machlup, 1952; Vickers, 1960) have been predominantly critical of
those assumptions. Their disapprovals take various forms, but they all arise from
CVP's departures from the normal supply and demand models in price theory
economics. In consequence, it assumes that variations in volume have no influence on
43
elasticity of demand or on the efficiency of factors of production. Possibly the utmost
elementary dissimilarity among CVP analysis and price theory models is that CVP
ignores the curvilinear nature of total revenue and total cost schedules. Managerial
accountants recognize these economic critiques, but they rely on the other hand that
CVP analysis is a very advantageous initial analysis of strategic decisions (Horngren
et al., 1994).
Thus, managers characteristically must take into consideration an extensive diversity
of factors and decisions, for which they need to, employ a comprehensive variety of
tools and techniques. Many of such techniques are equally essential to effective
management.
In recent years, the business environment has witnessed more changes in competition
tools and management strategies. Consequently these are major changes that must be
implemented as to how organizations are managed and in how work is achieved. One
of the major tools which must be modified to be able to deal with such a new
environment is the budgeting system.
In contrary the CVP‟s ability to predict future costs, revenues and other factor, is
sometimes limited, hence what are probably minor variation from strict linearity are
likely to be significant compared to other forecasting errors. During a period of time,
the revenues and costs are estimated for different levels of output. Products may have
life cycles of many years. Mc Watters et al, (2001) discusses this problem in depth
and point out that, to accommodate a longer product life cycle, an assumption could
be made that each intermediate time period is identical in terms of revenues and costs.
44
If revenues and costs differ for intermediate time periods; some methods of trading
off profits from different periods of time must be used.
Supplementary criticisms of the basic nature of CVP analysis relates to its
connections to standard economic models, rather than its differences. Similar to
standard economic price theory models, basic CVP analysis ordinarily undertakes,
among other things, the following: single-stage, single-product manufacturing
processes; simple production functions with one causal variable; cost categories
limited to only variable or fixed; and data and production functions susceptible to
certainty forecasts. Additional, CVP analysis is typically restricted to one time period
in each case. The inadequacy of CVP appears to be discouraging, but CVP is flexible
enough to overcome them all, if necessary and desirable. Nonlinear and stochastic
CVP models comprising multistage, multi-product, multivariate, or multi-period
contexts are all promising, although a single model implementation all of those
postponements would look a thorough parting from the whole point of CVP analysis,
its basic straightforwardness. Universally, the strength and reputation of CVP analysis
undeniably reveals the willingness of its users to "live with" the deficiencies
discovered by censures of its elementary nature.
2.5 Conceptual Framework of the Study
CVP analysis explores the fundamental relationships between cost -volume-profit
variables. It is observed that changes in volume do influence cost and profit and,
while this process gets underway, a stage is reached when cost is equated with
revenue at a certain level of output or at a certain volume of sales. This is recognized
as break-even point. Practically, break-even point is a point which is incidental to
CVP analysis. Therefore, an attempt to define CVP analysis as break-even analysis
45
should be considered only restrictive. It must be admitted that break-even analysis
does become an integral part of CVP analysis but the two are not synonymous.
In the CVP analysis, sales price and sales volume appear as two independent
variables and they are often directly related to each other.
Profit is always a matter of primary concern to management. The volume of sale
never remains constant. It fluctuates up and down and income also goes up and down
with fluctuations in volume. Profit is actually the result of interplay of different factor
like cost, volume and selling price. Effectiveness of a manager depends on his
capabilities to make right predictions about future profits. This can be done when
correct relationship existing between cost, volume and profit is known. For this
reason, knowledge of relationship among cost, volume and profit is of immense help
to the management. This knowledge of cost-volume-profit relationship helps
management to find out right solution for such problems.
The quality of products and services and speed of production and delivery are the
factors that managers considers when using CVP analysis to determine product
prices, the mix of products, market strategy, appropriate sales commissions,
advertising budgets, production schedules, and a host of other important planning
decisions. Although CVP analysis is most useful for planning, it is also be used to
assist with controlling decisions and evaluating decisions. In fact, a lot of what is
done in management accounting involves some aspect of C-V-P analysis because of
the tremendous potential it has to help management increase the profitability and
effectiveness of an organization.
46
C-V-P analysis is a very important concept in management accounting and the key
factors involved in CVP analysis include (1) the revenues derived from the sales
prices charged for goods and services, (2) the fixed and variable costs, (3) the sales
volume, (4) the mix of products, (5) the speed and quality of production, and (6) the
resulting profits.
There have been many studies on CVP analysis for decision making as used in
organizations a long time ago. Nevertheless, these studies have not been telling us
how effective is the model in providing the managers with the information needed
particularly in the changing business environment. It is argued that, in order to
appropriately use this model, the stable environment is assumed in which cost and
volume will be stable. But this is not always true. Costs do change because of prices
and efficiency and volume changes because of change in demand or the conditions
within the organization that may affect production volume. Thus, in particular, this
study desires to comprehend how supportive is CVP analysis in decision making,
especially in contemporary manufacturing companies.
Although CVP analysis is often used to develop an understanding of the overall
operations of an organization or business segment, its accuracy decreases as the scope
of operations being analyzed increases. Once they analyze the reasons for differences
in profitability, emphasis can be placed on increasing revenues, reducing costs, or
both. They can also hold managers more accountable for performance, which should
motivate their work efforts toward the organization‟s goals.
47
Strict CVP assumptions are violated in many business settings. The types of
uncertainties already discussed can lead to nonlinear behavior in revenues and costs.
In addition, it may be difficult to determine the point of operating activity where
operations move into a new relevant range.
Nevertheless, in many business settings CVP analysis provides useful information.
Accountants and managers use their knowledge of the organization‟s operations and
their judgment to evaluate whether the CVP assumptions are reasonable for their
setting. They can rely more on CVP results when the assumptions are less likely to be
violated. Also, the data used in CVP calculations must be updated continually to be
useful.
Figure 3: Conceptual Framework for Variables of the Study
Independent variables Intermediate variables Dependent variables
Source: Field work 2013
2.6 Relevance of Literature
There is hardly any research project which is totally unrelated with research that has
already taken place. Usually every individual research project only adds to the
accumulation of evidence on a particular issue. Unless the existing work, conclusions
-Selling price
-Sales volume
-Economy
-Business environment
-Demand and supply
-Rules and Regulations
- Laws
-Profit
-Costs
48
and controversies are properly brought about, most research work would not appear
relevant, nor will it appear important in the whole framework. Thus, review of
literature is a very important aspect of any research both for planning the research
work as well as to show its relevance and significance.
The literature means the works the researcher consulted in order to understand and
investigate the research problem (Kombo and Tromp, 2006). It is therefore an
account of what has been published on a topic by recognized scholars and
researchers. It is a critical look at the existing researches that are significant to the
work that the researcher will be carrying out. It involves examining documents such
as books, magazines, journals and dissertations that have a bearing on the study being
conducted.
Literature review is the part of the paper where the researcher will be given the
opportunity to strengthen his/her paper by citing what other reliable authors have said
about the study. This is done to identify specific gaps in the previous studies related
to the problem. That is, the researcher identifies the questions that have not been
answered and problems that have not been solved. And by identifying gaps in the
prior studies, the researcher can justify the originality of the proposed dissertation
research. The originality can be an extension of research that has been published or a
modification of existing methodology or theory that can be used to perform another
study
There are many reasons why literature review is rendered as a significant part of any
research or dissertation paper. The literature review is an essential component of any
research undertaking due to the following;
49
It improves and expands the theoretical basis of the study. Literature review
permits the researcher to study different theories linked to the acknowledged
topic. By reviewing these theories, a researcher gains intelligibility and better
understanding of the theoretical foundations related to contemporary research.
A literature review is an introductory exploration to support generates and
enhances research philosophies. It gives the researcher a comprehension into
what has previously been done in the carefully chosen field, pinpointing its
strength and weaknesses. This information guides the researcher in the
construction of a theory that aims at addressing the identified gaps.
The knowledge of the preceding works aids the scholar to cultivate a
substantial problem which will offer further understanding in the arena of
study. It also helps in restricting the research problem. This is through
interpreting what has previously been done and what would be worthwhile to
put an emphasis on in the current study. Review of literature is also important
to highlight difference in opinions, contradictory findings or evidence, and the
different explanations given for their conclusions and differences by different
authors. In some cases, an analysis of these factors can help one understand
various facets of a complex issue and at other times, such analysis can lead to
a new possibility that can be researched upon in the current project.
Extensive reading exposes the investigator to a range of methodologies of
dealing with the inquiry subject. This contributes to a well-designed approach.
The researcher can circumvent procedures specified in the literature to be
unsuccessful and implement new approaches. This will end in a substantial
study. That is, literature review is a foundation for realizing and providing
awareness into research strategies and methodologies that may be appropriate
50
to the research at hand. It also helps to avoid the mistakes, which already
done by another one. So researcher can improve the research design and
instrumentation, which was not successful at the last time (Cottrell &
McKenzie 2011).
Thus, due to its importance the Literature Review requires good organization.
Specifically, the researcher needs to develop efficient time management and note-
taking skills.it is also essential to be focused on assessing what is relevant to the
proposed research, and what is not relevant (irrelevant). A new research is depends on
the past knowledge, and not includes a part of knowledge. A well created literature
review establishes creditability of the researcher of the study, so he can get the entire
benefit of his work (O‟Leary 2004).
2.7 Conclusion
To help managers make better decisions, accountants should evaluate the quality of
the techniques they use, given the organizational setting and decisions to be made.
The quality of information generated from an analysis technique is higher if the
economic setting is consistent with the technique‟s underlying assumptions. Thus, the
outcome of this study can help decision makers determine when the technique; (CVP
analysis) is likely to be an appropriate tool and how much reliance to place on the
results. It can further be of assistance in making conclusions on the relevance and
efficiency of the technique under study.
51
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
Research methodology makes up one of the most fundamental parts in any research
project because it is a structure for data collection and analysis which facilitates
interpretation of such data in the practical section of the study. It is a way to
systematically solve the problem. It may be understood as a science of studying how
research is done scientifically (Kothari, 2004).
This section presents an overview of the methods used in the study. Areas covered
include the research design, population, sample and sampling techniques, data
collection and analysis.
3.1 Research Design
Research Design is the conceptual structure within which the research is conducted. It
is the arrangement of conditions for the collection and analysis of data in a manner
that aims to combine the relevance to the research purpose with economy in
procedures (Kothari, 2004).
The researcher adopted the survey type of research in which a sample from the target
population was used for the study. The study involved evaluation of the effectiveness
of Cost Volume Profit analysis in manufacturing companies. Consequently, the
research was designed to achieve the research objectives set out by the researcher.
52
3.2 Population
According to Kombo and Tromp (2006), population is a group of individuals, objects
or items from which samples are taken for measurement. It refers to an entire group
of persons or elements that have at least one thing in common, for instance students at
university.
Tanzania Portland Cement Company Limited (TPCC) is currently the leader in the
cement industry in Tanzania. The company‟s objective is manufacturing, selling and
distribution of high quality construction cement in Tanzania and its cement
production covers approximately 45 per cent of the total cement market in Tanzania.
On the other hand, despite the fact that CVP is appropriate for many types of
industries, this type of analysis is typical for manufacturing firms. The targeted
population for study thus includes the following;
1. Chief Director and Directors of all departments
2. Coordinating Directors, Finance Officers and other staff of TPCC
3. Heads and staff of Management Accounting (cost accounting) department/division
3.3 Sampling and Sampling Techniques
Ideally one wants to study is the entire population. However, usually it is impossible
or unfeasible to do this and therefore one must settle for a sample. Sampling is the
process of selecting units, for example, people or organizations, from a population of
interest so that by studying the sample we may fairly generalize our results back to
the population from which they were chosen (William, 2006). It is the process of
selecting a group of subjects for a study in such a way that the individuals represent
53
the larger group from which they were selected. The key terms in sampling are
population and sampling frame. According to Black and Champion (1976), sample is
a portion of elements taken from a population, which is considered to be
representative of the population.
The questionnaire survey technique was used for primary data collection. For the
purpose of this study, random probability sampling and non-random sampling were
selected. Particularly, simple random sampling and purposive sampling were used
respectively. The basic characteristic of random sampling is that all members of the
population have an equal and independent chance of being included in the sample
(Kothari, 2004). An important benefit of simple random sampling is that it allows
researchers to use statistical methods to analyse sample results. It is also considered
as a fair way of selecting a sample from a given population since every member is
given equal opportunities of being selected. Due to the representativeness of a sample
obtained by simple random sampling, it is reasonable to make generalizations from
the results of the sample back to the population. As concerns, departmental directors,
coordinating directors, finance officers, management accounting and other staff were
included for simple random sampling.
A purposive sample is a non-representative subset of some larger population, and is
constructed to serve a very specific need or purpose. In this study, the Chief Director,
Head of management accounting division and production manager were included for
purposive sampling (non-random sampling). The respondents involved for random
sampling comprises departmental directors, coordinating directors, finance officers,
cost accounting division staff and other staff of TPCC.
54
3.3.1 Sample Size
The most important thing to take into consideration when thinking about the size of
sample is that, the sample should be optimum, that is, it should neither be extremely
large nor too small. This enhances efficiency, representativeness, reliability and
flexibility. As Roscoe (1975) affirms, “sample sizes larger than 30 and less than 500
are appropriate for most research”. Having in mind these limitations, the sample size
consisted of about 51 respondents, designed for the sample selected from the targeted
population.
Table 1: Profile of respondents
Description of respondent type Number to be sampled
Chief director 1
Departmental directors 4
Production manager 1
Coordinating directors 4
Finance officers 7
Head of management accounting division 1
Management accounting division staff 18
Other staff 15
Total 51
3.4 Data Collection Methods
Data collection is important in the study as it allows for dissemination of accurate
information and development of meaningful programmes.
There are two major sources of data used by researchers namely, primary and
secondary sources.
55
3.4.1 Primary Data
Primary data are collected from original sources and not from already published
sources (Robson, 2003). This is through interview, questionnaire, diaries, observation
and focus group. Saunders et al, 2007 define primary data as data collected
specifically for the research project being undertaken.
3.4.2 Secondary Data
Secondary data are information neither collected directly by the user nor specifically
for the user, that is, data that are already available. They refer to the data which have
already collected by someone else. Saunders and Thornhill (2007) describes
secondary data as data used for a research project that were originally for some other
purpose. They include raw data and published summaries and may be collected from
diverse source of documents or electronically stored information.
3.4.3 Data collection Instruments
These are tools for data collection. The research tool provides the input into a study
and therefore the quality and validity of the output (the findings), are solely
dependent on it. For the purpose of this research, and in order to achieve the
objectives, relevant data were collected and both primary and secondary data were
used. The secondary data contributed toward the formation of background
information, needed by both the researcher in order to build constructively the project
and the reader to comprehend more thoroughly the survey outcome. Documentary
reviews of various studies and reports from Cement manufacturing industries, the
government, and other reports on the uses of Cost Volume Profit Analysis in decision
making were consulted.
56
Primary data were collected in two ways. Firstly, a questionnaire survey was
conducted by the researcher visiting the case study premises. Secondly, interviews
were also carried out with the organization members and some selected stakeholders
of the industry.
This study included both qualitative and quantitative data. Thus, the researcher
collected data by administering a questionnaire along with interviews to pave the way
for easy analysis of data. Focus group discussion was also conducted for top
management team and employees who are working in management accounting unit as
well as production manager.
3.4.3.1 Questionnaire
This is the primary vehicle of data gathering in sampling human population
(Baradyana and Ame, 2007).
The questionnaire used structured questions, consisting of approximately 27 questions
divided into five sections „A‟ „B‟, „C‟ „D‟ and „E‟, with an introductory part for
respondents‟ selected particulars. Section „A‟ consisted of six questions seeking to
answer the first research question. Section „B‟ consisted of six questions covering the
second research question whereas section „C‟ comprised questions to answer the third
research question. Sections „D‟ and E was made up of questions for answering
research questions four and five respectively. Most of the structured questions were
the close-ended type and respondents were asked to mark the appropriate box
57
matching the correct answer. Other questions, however, required respondents to give
opinions.
In this category of data collection, the targeted group included heads and staff of
Management Accounting (cost accounting) department/division and other staff of
TPCC.
3.4.3.2 Interview
The interview method of collecting data involves presentation of oral-verbal stimuli
and reply in terms of oral-verbal responses (Kothari, 2004). It is a conversation in
which one person (the interviewer) elicits information from another person (the
subject or interviewee). A writer or reporter asks questions of one or more persons
from whom material is sought for a certain purpose.
For convenience and reliability of the data collected, the interview was channelled to
chief Chief Director, Directors of all departments, Coordinating Directors, Finance
Officers and production manager.
3.5 Data Analysis
Data analysis involves uncovering underlying structures, extracting important
variables, detecting any inconsistency and testing any underlying assumptions.
The responses to the structured close-ended questions were rated in percentages.
The percentage of respondents for each alternative was given and analyzed. The data
collected were analyzed with the help of the computer software known as Statistical
Package for Service Solution (SPSS).
58
3.6 Reliability and Validity of the Study
3.6.1 Reliability
Research findings have to be credible, and credibility has something to do with the
extent to which research results are reliable and valid. Reliability refers to how
consistent a measuring device is. Joppe (2000) defines reliability as the extent to
which results are consistent over time and an accurate representation of the total
population under study. A measurement is said to be reliable or consistent if the
measurement can produce similar results if used again in similar circumstances. Thus,
reliability is concerned with whether the measure used in research will yield the same
results in different occasions or if it can provide similar observations if done by
different researchers on different occasions (Saunders et al, 2000).
Although the term „Reliability‟ is a concept used for testing or evaluating quantitative
research, the idea is most often used in all kinds of research. According to Stenbacka,
(2001) the concept of reliability is even misleading in qualitative research. If a
qualitative study is discussed with reliability as a criterion, the consequence is rather
that the study is no good. On the other hand, Patton (2002) states that validity and
reliability are two factors which any qualitative researcher should be concerned about
while designing a study, analysing results and judging the quality of the study.
3.6.2 Validity
The concept of validity is described by a wide range of terms in qualitative studies.
This concept is not a single, fixed or universal concept, but “rather a contingent
construct, inescapably grounded in the processes and intentions of particular research
methodologies and projects” (Winter, 2000). Although some qualitative researchers
59
have argued that the term validity is not applicable to qualitative research, but at the
same time, they have realized the need for some kind of qualifying check or measure
for their research. For example, Creswell & Miller (2000) suggest that the validity is
affected by the researcher‟s perception of validity in the study and his/her choice of
paradigm assumption. As a result, many researchers have developed their own
concepts of validity and have often generated or adopted what they consider to be
more appropriate terms, such as, quality, rigor and trustworthiness (Stenbacka, 2001).
3.6.3 Achieving Validity and Reliability
It is important to understand some of the problems concerning reliability which might
arise and because issues of validity and reliability are an important part of any study
in the social sciences, it is important to identify some ways of dealing with results.
This is the case study research; therefore the researchers went to great lengths to
ensure that interpretations of the data are both reliable and valid.
It is ideal to reliably measure, every time, exactly those things which we intended to
measure. However, researcher was able to go into great lengths and make every
attempt to ensure accuracy in the study, but still deal with the inherent difficulties of
measuring particular behaviors of variables under study.
This study includes both qualitative and quantitative data. Therefore, a triangulation
of techniques was used in collecting primary data. Triangulation includes multiple
methods of data collection and data analysis, but does not suggest a fix method for all
the researches.
60
CHAPTER FOUR
STUDY FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
4.0 Introduction
This chapter presents findings of the study as the result of analysis of data collected
from the research field. There are three main sources of data from which the findings
are generated; oral interview, questionnaire and review of TPCC annual reports
(financial statements). Oral interviews and questionnaires were used to source for
primary data different levels of management officials of TPCC. Seventeen
respondents were interviewed and the questionnaires were also given to them and
further thirty four respondents were given questionnaires. Furthermore, some libraries
were used and a lot of textbooks, journals, financial statement and newspapers were
consulted during the collection of secondary data. All the questionnaire were returned
and analysed which served as our basis of discussion and recommendation.
The general objective of this study was to determine if CVP can assist management in
formulating pricing policies by projecting the effect of different price structures on
cost and profit and to highlight the usefulness of CVP analysis in manufacturing
companies in Tanzania. The specific objectives were to identify the factors affecting
CVP analysis, to determine the challenges facing manufacturing companies when
using CVP analysis for decision making, to determine the relevance of CVP in
modern manufacturing firm‟s decision making, to find out if CVP analysis is helpful
in setting up flexible budget which indicates cost at various levels of activities and to
find out if CVP analysis is useful in evaluating performance for the purpose of
control.
61
4.1 Features of Respondents
This section is dedicated to the offer the particulars of respondents predominantly sex,
level of education and working experience. Fifty one (51) respondents were involved
in the study and their personal details are given below.
4.1.1 Gender Parity
TPCC had 356 employees including 318 (89%) males and 38 (11%) females from
which a sample of 51 was drawn. From the sample; 45 (88%) were men whereas
women comprises 6 (12%). The company had more men compared to women but
there was no reason other than professional qualification on such imbalance. It was
stated that gender has nothing to do with the company‟s overall performance.
4.1.2 Level of Education
Level of education in this regard encompasses competences of the management and
other staff of the company. The investigation revealed that TPCC has qualified staff
in its different departments. Its team comprises people who are skilled,
knowledgeable, committed and having positive attitude towards their work. The great
party of employees hold degree and/or post graduate degrees. This conform the
performance of the company.
62
Table 2: Level of Education
S/N Level of education Frequency Percentage
1 Degree/postgraduate 37 73
2 Diploma 9 18
3 Secondary school 5 9
4 Primary school 0 0
Total 51 100
Source: Field work 2013
Note: respondents were required to indicate their highest education level only
4.1.3 Work Experience
As far as the study is concerned, work is the time an employee has worked in the
company under study. The outcome confirms that the company has good retaining
ratio of its employees. More employees have been serving the company for more than
5 years. There are few employees worked for less than 3 years. This indicates that
experienced and skilled labourers are retained to enhance improvement in company‟s
performance.
63
Table 3: Work experience
S/N Experience Frequency Percentage
1 Less than 3 years 9 17
2 3-5 years 12 24
3 More than 5 years 30 59
Total 51 100
Source: Field survey 2013
4.2 Historical Background of the Company
Tanzania Portland Cement Company Limited (TPCC) was established in 1959
producing its first bag of cement in 1962, in association with Tanzania Development
Corporation and Cementia AG of Switzerland. The major cement-producing facilities
at Wazo Hill in Dar es Salaam went online in 1966. In 1973 the company was
nationalized with the government of Tanzania owning 100% of shares. In 1998 the
company was reprivatized by the government to Scancem of Norway and Swedfund.
By 2005 Twiga was a part of Heidelberg Cement Africa, of which Scancem is
subsidiary. The company‟s objective is manufacturing, selling and distribution of
high quality construction cement in Tanzania. Today the company remains the market
leader in the cement industry in Tanzania.
The company manufactures two brands of cement, strictly conforming to the latest
standards issued by Tanzania Bureau of Standards; Twiga Ordinary and Twiga Extra.
64
TPCC is the leading cement producer in Tanzania and operates a cement plant near
the coastal city of Dar es Salaam, the biggest market in Tanzania. TPCC‟s current
cement production covers approximately 45 per cent of the total cement market in
Tanzania.
4.3 Objective One: General Understanding of Cost Volume Profit Analysis
(Factors Affecting CVP Analysis)
The first research question was derived from this objective. The researcher intended
to investigate if the respondents have knowledge on the model (CVP analysis). As a
result the question was further broken into six small questions so as to comprehend
the concept. Respondents were urged to choose the correct answer and below are the
results from respondents;
4.3.1 CVP Analysis Awareness
Most of respondents (48/51), that is, 94% of the respondents were conscious of the
model whereas three out of fifty one respondents were completely ignorant about the
technique. Additionally, it was surprising that among the three who were absolutely
uninformed of the method, one was the member of the top management.
4.3.2 Linearity of Costs and Revenue
Respondents were asked to tell the researcher, in accordance with their practical
experience, if the statement stated by academicians that costs and revenue have linear
relationships is true. Six (6) respondents agreed while forty five (45) were different.
The reply of respondents shows that costs and revenues are not linear. In oral
interview some were giving more explanations on that but there was no point which
65
can give an opinion that cost and revenue are linear. In depth probing demonstrated
that who the „yes‟ replies were based on theoretical beliefs. This is similar to Ndalima
and Bala (2007), in a study on block industry in Nigeria, discovered that “sales
revenue and total cost were not linear, two or more breakeven points were found to
exist, some costs fall under both fixed and variable portions and that beyond certain
optimal production levels sales revenue decreases and total cost also increases.
This contradicts with the declaration given by other researchers and academicians
such as Drury, (2004) who states that within the relevant range, it is generally
assumed that costs and revenue fuctions are approximately linear but outside the
relevant range linearity is unlikely to appear. This indicated that total cost function is
linear for a certain period. Although in reality the Variable costs discussed in this case
(TPCC) tends to be curvilinear in behaviour, for the sake of the analysis they are
relaxed to be linear functions. This however does not decrease the usefulness of the
analysis as it give a solid ground and a good overview for managers to start further
investigation of problems and to be able to take right decisions. Therefore it is urged
that it may be well that management is of the opinion that over the likely output range
linearity is a reasonable assumption to make.
4.3.3 Drivers of Costs
In traditional costing the cost driver to allocate indirect cost to cost objects was
volume of output. With the change in business structures, technology and thereby cost
structures it was found that the volume of output was not the only cost driver. Some
examples of indirect costs and their drivers are: indirect costs for maintenance, with
the possible driver of this cost being the number of machine hours; or, the indirect
66
cost of handling raw-material cost, which may be driven by the number of orders
received; or, inspection costs that are driven by the number of inspections or the hours
of inspection or production runs (Drury 2004).
Examination and analysis of company cost activities are important in classifying
overhead costs into those based on organizational activities or those based on
operational activities. Organizational activities are company related in the long-term,
while operational activities are product related. Operational activities can be further
classified into three levels: unit, batch and product (Lucey, 1996). Overhead cost
allocation and apportionment can then be worked out systematically.
Our study shows that cost drivers are many and they might be situational in some
cases depending on the prevailing business condition. A certain cost may be
influenced by a certain driver in a certain period and another driver in another period.
All of our respondents (51) that is 100% disagreed on the notion that volume is the
only factor which influences costs. To conclude, a clear conceptual view is needed for
correct classification and measurement of overhead costs.
4.3.4 Separation of Costs into Fixed and Variable Categories
Respondents were asked in this to indicate how their company classifies specific cost
items; but the question appeared not to be fair to ask anybody. The result indicates
that there are too many variables that influence the classification, and the prescription
of fixed rules to follow when classifying costs will be of no value.
67
The following guidelines may however be used in the classification and management
of costs;
1. Since fixed costs are responsible for increasing the operating risk of a
business, companies should manage the operating risk by determining, on an
on-going basis, the fixed costs as a percentage of total costs.
2. Since the cost items of direct and indirect manufacturing labour are mostly
classified as fixed costs, efforts must be made to shift direct costs to variable
costs.
The three-category classification (fixed, variable and semi-variable) used in this study
is insufficient to explain the behaviour of specific cost items. This classification must
be based on the amount of time or money it takes to get rid of the costs. Companies
should analyse their fixed costs in order to distinguish between committed and
discretionary costs. It is important to note that the accuracy of the cost-volume-profit
analysis is a function of the accurate classification of total costs into fixed and
variable components. If the classification is done poorly, the results will be
misleading.
It was also found separation of mixed costs is difficult and these can be put in any
category as the management thinks fit. This finding confirms the conclusion by
Hough (1993) that some managers regard costs to be variable when output climbs and
fixed when output falls. Also, costs are classified differently in order to report
“different costs for different purposes”. Bear and Mills (1994) explain this matter in
their research, which shows that all costs are classified as variable for activity-based
68
costing purposes and all costs, except direct materials, are classified as fixed for
throughput costing purposes.
However, a reliable observation was obtained as 96% of respondents (49) confirmed
that TPCC separates its costs into fixed and variable components and only 2%
disagreed.
4.3.5 Factors Affecting CVP Analysis
The question on factors affecting CVP was unexpectedly not understood to some of
respondents. So the researcher was required to put some more explanation on it
especially to respondents who were involved in interview. Some respondents were
even unable to give their replies on the question.
The result shows that volume, unit selling price, variable cost per unit, fixed costs and
sales mix in combination are the factors affecting the model by 64%. During the
course of interview it was also realized that there are so many factors affecting CVP
in practise such as demand and supply, government regulations, changes in the value
of currency and learning curve.
Table 4: Factors Influencing CVP
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Volume 2 4
2 Unit selling price 6 13
3 Variable cost per unit 8 17
4 Total fixed cost 1 2
5 Sales mix 0 0
6 All the above 31 64
Total 48 100
Source: Survey data 2013
69
Note 1: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
Note 2: Three (3) respondents did not give any response
4.3.6 Factors affecting CVP the Most
Apart from knowing factors affecting the method the researcher was interested to
further know which factor(s) plays a great role in persuading the model. Variable cost
gives the impression to be the most affecting factor of CVP analysis with the highest
score of 45% followed by unit selling price which occupies 36%. Total fixed cost
ranked third (11%) while sales mix seems to be the least. Volume which Horngren et
al, (1997) assumes to be the only factor influencing costs ranked fourth by only 4%.
It is urged that further investigations have to be done on the most affecting factor so
as to put more reliance on the model for decision making. This is because of low
percentage of response (less than 50%) on the issue.
Table 5: Factor Affecting CVP The Most
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Volume 2 4
2 Unit selling price 17 36
3 Variable cost per unit 21 45
4 Total fixed cost 5 11
5 Sales mix 0 0
6 All the above 2 4
Total 51 100
Source: Field work 2013
70
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
4.4 Second Objective: CVP Analysis And Related Challenges
The challenges facing management is numerous particularly during the period of
economic depression characterized by liquidation of many companies, low capacity
utilization, shortage of rapid change in foreign exchange currencies and the advanced
state of competition. Management is faced with the problem of how to make use of
the available scare resources in order to achieve the objective of profit maximization
(Researcher, 2013).
4.4.1 The Use of CVP Analysis in Planning and Control
The company lacks understanding on the importance of cost volume profit analysis
over other forms of techniques and as the result TPCC seems to not to consider CVP
analysis as a strong tool in their decision making. There is no practical application of
cost volume profit analysis in the organization. Eighty two percent (82%) of
respondents said that CVP analysis is not the technique used for decision making in
the company. From oral interview, budgeting, return on investment (ROI) and net
present value (NPV) appeared to be the methods preferred.
4.4.2 Planning and Control Problems
Planning is an inevitable part of all rational human activity. Because of its
importance to organizations, the planning processes have to be sophisticated and
structured in order to improve their efficiency. Lucey, (1996), defines planning as the
establishment of objectives, policies, strategies, tactics and actions required to
71
achieve these objectives. Control is concerned with the efficient use of resources to
achieve a previously determined objectives contained in a plan.
Planning precedes control, and planning without consideration of the type, frequency
and method of control will largely be a waste of time (Researcher, 2013).
The question required respondents to give brief explanations on the problems the
company faces in planning and control of the organization‟s operations.
The analysis specifies that, control is applied at different levels within the company.
The analysis indicates that TPCC has two categories, internal and external focused
control. Externally, the company‟s emphasis is on how a firm, given its strengths and
weakness, and limitations can compete with other firms in the same industry. Internal
control aims at influencing employee behaviours in desirable ways in order to
increase the probability that organizational goals will be achieved.
The main problems related to control are the fruit or products of mistakes done or
violence of planning procedures. Sometimes, the plan set becomes difficult to realize.
This stems from improper planning which comprises imposing control measures
which motivate some employees to engage in behaviour that is not organizationally
desirable. In other cases the company‟s objectives seems to be unspecified which
consequently, causes difficulties in linking the plan/ budget requirements to chart of
account.
72
The evidence suggests that data manipulation is common with result control. There
are some employees who attempt to distort the data in order to improve the
performance measure. Another problem is that, if controls are applied excessively
rigorously results in job related tensions, conflict and deterioration in relationship
with managers. Furthermore, there are some factors which cannot be controlled such
as economic and competitive factors, acts of nature and interdependencies.
4.4.3 CVP Analysis in Long-Term Planning
CVP analysis becomes more complex and questionable if its application is extended
to a longer term time horizon (Drury, 2004). In the longer term other factors besides
volume are likely to be important. Break even analysis completely ignores the capital
employed in business hence it has limited application in the long range planning. It
ignores marketing aspects and effects of government policies and other authorities‟
regulations which are necessary in decision making (Researcher, 2013).
Regarding the applicability of CVP for strategic planning the study wanted to know if
CVP analysis is used for long-term planning in the company. The result indicates that
CVP is completely not used for long-term planning as 100%, 51 respondents were not
in favour of the issue.
4.5 Third Objective: Applicability of Breakeven Analysis in Modern
Manufacturing Firms
4.5.1 Capital or Labour Intensive Business
The relationship between a company‟s variable and fixed costs is reflected in its
operating leverage. Typically, highly labour-intensive organizations have high
variable cost and low fixed cost; these organizations have low operating leverage
73
(MacArthur, J.B. and Stranahan, H.A., 1998). Conversely, organizations that are
highly capital intensive or automated have cost structures that include low variable
and high fixed cost, providing high operating leverage.
Twenty eight (28) respondents which is equivalent to 54% told the researcher that the
company is capital intensive while 18% stating that TPCC is labour intensive.
Fourteen (14) respondents, 28% were impartial and said the firm is capital and labour
at equal mixture.
Table 6: Capital or Labour Intensive Business
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Labour intensive 9 18
2 Capital intensive 28 54
3 Capital and labour at equal mixture 14 28
Total 51 100
Source: Survey data 2013
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
Furthermore, the survey especially in oral interview discovered that, no significant
positive relationship was found to exist between the fixed cost component of the
company and their degree of technological development. The fact that the company
reported that direct and indirect manufacturing labour tend to be more fixed means
that it is very difficult for manufacturing company to adjust their workforce according
to production needs. This contradicts the theory that classifies labour as a variable
cost (Garrison and Noreen 2000; Fritzsch 1998).
74
4.5.2 Price Determinants and CVP and Competition
Cost information is only one of many variables that must be considered in the pricing
decisions. In some firms prices are set by overall market demand and supply forces
and the firm has little or no influence over the selling prices if its products or services
(Dwivedi, 2008). Other variables include competitor‟s price and number of
substitutes.
According to “ THE CITIZEN” newspaper dated 8 September 2011 Cement
imported from India, China and Pakistan into the East African Community (EAC)
member states is hurting local manufacturers since it is sold at a cheap price than the
locally manufactured products. For the company's cement to be able to compete with
the imported brands, TPCC slashed its products' prices by 11 per cent starting June
2010. This move resulted in a 20 per cent rise in turnover as a result of higher sales
volumes compared to 2009.
Table 14; below shows that the price for TPCC cement is determined by the
combination production costs, demand and supply and competitors‟ price by 78%.
Demand and supply takes the second rank with 14% while competitors‟ price seems
to be the least to be considered. Production cost costs follows demand and supply
with 6%. Thus we can conclude that demand and supply plays a great role in pricing
policy of TPCC.
75
Table 7: Price Determinants and CVP and Competition
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Production costs 3 6
2 Demand and supply 7 14
3 Competitors‟ price 1 2
4 Combination of a, b and c 40 78
Total 51 100
Source: Survey data 2013
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
4.5.3 CVP and Risks
Today's economy is faced with challenges such as constantly increasing competition
on worlds markets, strengthening less developed countries and their economies, and
stronger technological innovations. Although certain changes that occur are the
stimulus to economic activity, also, some movements on the market may become a
threat (Researcher, 2013). In fact, the current economic crisis as recession has
covered all countries of the world, and the consequences that result are very critical.
Lowering production and other economic activities are caused by a number of other
events that adversely affect the economy, for example, reduced production, growth of
fixed costs per unit, reducing the number of employees and increase of
unemployment, decrease in exports and weakening domestic currency exchange rate.
In addition to the expected values of profit for the company, management is always
interested in the degree of uncertainty of the planned profit (Drury, 2004). Traditional
76
CVP model suffers from the limitation of not including any adjustment for risk and
uncertainty.
The respondents were asked to state whether CVP model is capable of measuring the
risks and uncertainties the business faces in its day to day operations. The analysis
shows that 77% disagreed while only 23% of respondents agreed. These results
indicate that CVP analysis is unable to predict such risks.
4.6 Objective Four: Budgeting and CVP Analysis
4.6.1 Cost Behaviour in Budgeting
The knowledge of how costs will vary with different levels of activity is essential for
decision making (Drury, 2004).The study revealed that TPCC considers the behaviour
of costs when preparing their budget. However, there are some difficulties in
identifying the variable or fixed portion of cost in mixed costs. The management is of
the concern that it would better for the company to efficiently separate these costs but
it is still struggling to use the available knowledge to identify the best or appropriate
method to separate such costs.
Most academicians (Drury 2004 Lucey 1996 and Horngren et al, 2000) urge that
flexible budgets change in accordance with levels of activities in a firm, hence
making them simple to prepare. Most businesses should be using both static and
flexible budgets during the course of their business operations, with the only notable
exception being during business cycles when the company manages to strictly adhere
to the original static budget, in which case the actual statistics contained within the
static and flexible budgets would be equal.
77
According to our suervey TPCC is considerate to cost behaviour in the when comes
to the issue of budgeting. Forty two (42), (96%), respondents agreed that cost
behaviour is among the important issues to consider in budgeting while only 4% of
respondents were opposing.
4.6.2 Monitoring With Budget
Monitoring is very crucial in any business operation and it serves as a vehicle for
review and correction of any discrepancies related to business activities. TPCC uses
to monitor its operations regularly using flexible budget. Budgeting seems to be the
best tool for coordinating activities across the business and cash flows planning. This
conforms to findings by Chenhall and Langfield- Smith, (1998) which found that the
application of budgeting systems is the vehicle to assist resources allocation in the
short-term and capital budgeting and strategic planning for the long term.
72%, that is 37 respondents said the company do use flexible and fixed budget, while
20% and 8% stood for flexible and fixed budget respectively. This is in line with the
suggestion made by Kaplan et al, 1998.
Table 8: Monitoring with budget
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Flexible budget 10 20
2 Static budget 4 8
3 Both, static and flexible budget 37 72
Total 51 100
Source: Survey data 2013
78
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
4.6.3 Budgeting and the Company’s Business Pattern
Using cost volume profit analysis, mangers can develop trends that explain behavior
patterns of products and services (Emmanuel et al., 1990). Knowledge of these trends
is useful where the typical nature of the business is one that is unpredictable in terms
of sales levels and the demand for the products and services. Cost volume profit
analysis is therefore of important reliance in such business.
A brief outline is necessary in understanding the Cost Volume Profit analysis (or
CVP) and creating a decision model. In a very general outlook, the CVP looks at how
fixed, variable, and mixed costs change with changes in sales volume. The main goal
is to determine what factors control costs and see how management can use this
information to improve planning and control activity
In the course of survey the researcher came out with the conclusions that static and
flexible budgets are two separate yet interconnected parts of a solid business
accounting regimen. Static budgets are a good way to keep production costs on track,
and encourage the staff in charge of purchasing to make the greatest possible effort to
obtain the required goods at the lowest possible price. A flexible budget can
sometimes account for an entire company budget; however, it is best used as part of a
larger overall budget in a subsection role, such as a variable expense account.
79
4.7 Objective Five: Performance Evaluation With CVP Analysis
In developing performance measures that are appropriate to the needs of their
organizations, managers must consider not only the basic questions of what to
measure and how to measure, but a variety of other issues as well (Scarlett, 2005). A
performance report should contain information only about the costs, revenues, and
resources that a manager can control. Performance reports allow comparisons
between actual performance and budget expectations
4.7.1 Performance Valuation
The observation shows that financial performance evaluation measures are relatively
highly adopted than non-financial measures. According to oral interview, budget
variance analysis seems to be the most widely used model for performance evaluation
of the company. The comparison of other methods (ROI, NPV and Payback period)
showed that ROI which is at 64% percentage of adoption, and Net Present Value
(NPV) which is based on controlling profit at 23% adoption rate and payback period
at 13%.
Table 9: Performance Valuation Methods
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 ROI 32 64
2 NPV 12 23
3 Payback period 7 13
Total 51 100
Source: Field work 2013
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
80
Accordingly, it seems that all financial measures for performance evaluation are
either highly or moderately adopted, which indicates that TPCC place greater
emphasis on periodic profitability, which in turns reduces research and development
costs.
4.7.4 Bases for Performance Evaluation
Variable costing is a method of preparing profit center performance reports that
classifies a manager‟s controllable costs as variable or fixed (Scarlett, 2005).
Performance reports may also use flexible budgeting and variable costing to measure
and evaluate non-financial information. Conversely, flexible budgeting is a more
sophisticated method, according to AccountingCoach.com, because the new business
owner can make changes to the budget in the middle of the reporting period. The best
reason to use a static budget is the variance analysis (Drury, 2004)
Kaplan et al, 1998, assets that most businesses should be using both static and flexible
budgets during the course of their business operations, with the only notable
exception being during business cycles when the company manages to strictly adhere
to the original static budget, in which case the actual statistics contained within the
static and flexible budgets would be equal.
Table 10: Bases for Performance Evaluation
S/N Response Frequency Percentage
1 Flexible budget 11 21
2 Static budget 4 8
3 Both, static and flexible budget 36 71
Total 51 100
Source: Field data 2013
81
Note: This is based on restricted response (every respondent was asked to give only
one response).
The outcome of our investigation discovered that TPCC uses both fixed and flexible
budget as the base for performance evaluation of its operations. 71%, that is 36
respondents said the company do use flexible and fixed budget, while 21% and 4%
stood for flexible and fixed budget respectively. This is also in line with the
suggestion above by Kaplan et al, 1998.
4.7.5 Effectiveness and Efficiency of CVP
It was difficult for researcher to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of CVP as
the company has not adopted the method as a tool for planning and control of its
operations. The response from respondents on this indicates that there was no way in
which CVP could have helped the organization to operate effectively and at an
efficient way to management of its activities. For this case, the strict assumptions
may be the cause hence the application of the model becomes difficult to the extent
that it is not consired to yield substantial positive outcomes when used as a decision
tool.
However, according to Dwived, (2008), CVP model helps in evaluating the effects of
cost on changes in volume for the purpose of reviewing profits achieved and costs
incurred. For example, a company may want to purchase new equipment to increase
its production level. The new machine may increase fixed costs. In this case, to find
out the figure by which to decrease the variable cost in order to maintain the same
profit level, the company uses CVP analysis.
82
4.8 Summary of data analysis
The analysis of our data and discussion indicates that, the researcher‟s objectives
were achieved by 100%, but some respondents could not understand the issues related
to CVP. Although most of the variables of model are considered, CVP seems not to
be currently or prospectively considered to be of assistance. The deficiencies are
recognized and the researcher noted them and not only that but also recommended
further studies to be conducted on the problem.
TPCC is performing well in the country but it cannot be said as it is working at most
efficiency. It is well known that all manufacturing companies face more or less the
same challenges. These includes poor technology, unreliable market for the final
processed goods, high cost of power, unreliability of power and underdeveloped
infrastructure, unreliable availability of raw materials and small number of trained
manpower. Thus, the techniques for decision making are of the great importance to
enhance organizational competitiveness through organizational reengineering, cost
reduction, process improvement, and quality management, amongst other relevant
applications. Also, a number of organisational innovations have to be pursued to
enhance organisational competitiveness.
83
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0 Introduction
This chapter brings about summary, conclusions and recommendations on the
findings of the study. These are grounded from the research objectives and questions
of the problem.
5.1 Summary
This research work focused on the Analysis of performance of Cost Volume Profit
(CVP) analysis in manufacturing companies in Tanzania. The key variables in the
study are selling price of the products, volume of sales and cost of production The
general objective of this study to determine if CVP can assist management in
formulating pricing policies by projecting the effect of different price structures on
cost and profit and to highlight the usefulness of CVP analysis in manufacturing
companies in Tanzania.
Objective one: General Understanding of Cost Volume Profit Analysis
(Factors Affecting CVP Analysis)
C-V-P analysis provides management with a general overview of the company's
financial operations. However, it is important to note that the C-V-P analysis will
need updating as sales prices, sales mix and costs change to reflect the new
relationship between these variables. The results of the study indicates that CVP
analysis is indirectly used and at a very low pace. Executives and managerial
departments are using what they know about costs to create business strategies. By
gathering information on market demand and combining it with a marketing strategy
84
that focuses on higher margin products, the company is able to continue with
operations, increase profits and survive. TPCC Company is the highest performing
company in the industry of cement and the company separates its total costs in their
category of fixed and variable costs.
Objective two: CVP Analysis and Related Challenges
In the course of my study, it was realized that lot of problems or challenges are being
encountered by the company like problem of how to make use of the available scarce
resources in order to achieve the objective of profit maximization, there is no absolute
practical application of cost volume profit analysis in the company.
Objective three: Applicability of Breakeven Analysis in Modern Manufacturing
Firms
The sales of the company are consistently growing by considering any cost factors but
the variable cost of the company is not proportionately changing. The fluctuations in
the fixed costs are absolutely reasonable towards the company except in some cases.
The company is suffering from contribution losses because of its increased fixed costs
and declining of contribution. In the last five years 2007 to 2011, the highest
contribution for the company was in 2010 which is because of the variable cost
amount is comparatively less to its sales. The profit of the company is declining
because the fixed costs are increasing and contribution is decreasing. Thus the
relevance of the model (CVP) is questionable.
85
Objective four: Budgeting and CVP Analysis
TPCC makes fixed and flexible budgets. Flexible budget indicates the costs and the
expected revenues at various stages of production. They are also able to understand
the break-even concept, and hence they can make strategic budgets and avoid losses
where necessary. However, although CVP is helpful in achieving this, TPCC does not
consider it to be the powerful tool for their decisions.
Objective five: Performance Evaluation with CVP Analysis
Flexible budgets work well as a performance evaluation tool in conjunction with a
static budget and are basically a comprehensive accounting of the static budget's cost
variance. Because the flexible budget changes based upon volume, it provides a
greater level of control. Budget variance analysis and ROI are the models considered
to be more helpful in performance evaluation of TPCC.
5.2 Conclusion
Equally doubtful is the assumption that the variable cost curve is linear so that
variable costs change in direct proportion to changes in volume. As demand for input
factors increase so will their price, with the effect that the variable cost curve is likely
to increase proportionately faster as volume of output expands. To overcome the
limitations associated with the model, and to retain the usefulness of CVP analysis it
is necessary to limit the volume range to be examined so that the behaviour of both
fixed and variable costs may be more accurately determined. The basic assumption
that the cost-volume relationship is a linear relationship is realistic only over narrow
ranges of output which is called the relevant range.
86
CVP analysis, though it is a very useful tool for decision making, is based upon
certain assumptions which can rarely be completely realized in practice. Hence the
fragility of these assumptions places limits on the reliability of CVP analysis as a tool
in decision making. Nevertheless, in many business settings CVP analysis provides
useful information. Accountants and managers should use their knowledge of the
organization‟s operations and their judgment to evaluate whether the CVP
assumptions are reasonable for their setting. They can rely more on CVP results when
the assumptions are less likely to be violated. Also, the data used in CVP calculations
must be updated continually to be useful.
Increased global competition has forced firms to become more cost competitive.
Consequently, business managers have adopted various decision making models and
methods. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the companies must monitor
and take into account the requirements arising from the contemporary risky business
conditions. The new conditions require the implementation of new models and
methods of managing enterprises, and improving existing ones. In presented
enterprise, CVP analysis seemed to be not well known and hence not applied for
managers to find out and decide what to do to improve business and get planned
values of certain indicators. According to these methods, decision – making process is
much safer and possible and the results can be achieved at a higher level. The study
demonstrated the functions of CVP analysis particularly in manufacturing business as
well as its limitations.
Despite its limitations, the real usefulness of CVP is that it enriches the understanding
of the relationship between costs, volume and prices as factors affecting profit,
enabling management to make assumptions which will assist the decision-making
87
process in the short-run planning period. TPCC uses both flexible and fixed budgets
in its operations. A flexible budget is a statement of projected revenue and
expenditure based on various levels of production. The flexible budget responds to
changes in activity and may provide a better tool for performance evaluation. It is
more sophisticated and useful than a static budget. A flexible budget is compared to a
company‟s static budget to find variances between the levels of expected and actual
spending. Above all, the break-even analysis should be viewed as a guide to decision
making, not a substitute for judgement and common sense.
5.3 Recommendations
5.3.1 Recommendations to Policy Makers
The economic benefits for stakeholders and the government from the unit may
encourage policy makers to focus efforts on areas which are potential in
decision making. Cost management refers to the activities of managers in
short-run and long-run planning and control of costs. Therefore, beside the
traditional techniques new methods appear. Global market, international
business processes, customers‟ growing needs for high quality with low price
focus managers‟ attention to cost management. At the inception of CVP
analysis concept, manufacturing organizations were labour intensive. Now,
competition and complexity of the structure of production process of goods
have become increased. So, manufacturing organizations have to think about
production at lowest possible cost. On these circumstances, traditional
management accounting techniques are not giving the fruitful result to
response to the keen competition. At present, manufacturing organizations
have to adopt advanced management accounting techniques.
88
Costs have central role in business policy of the company. Management of the
company has very serious task to analyze each decision with respect to future
costs which will occur as a result of decisions made. It is necessary to consider
this issue because, however much it seemed abundantly, cost management
becomes more and more important especially in the modern business
environment, characterized by uncertainty and constant presence of risk, the
economic crisis with the effects of recession, growing competition, increase in
prices of basic energy for initiation of production capacity, new regulations in
the field of ecology and social responsibility and changes in consumers
preferences. Thus, policy makers should pave the way for policy implanters to
select the model for decision making and test the sensitivity of the model with
alternative scenarios and judge which outcome best describes their beliefs
about the future. In the case given, decision makers should be able to test
whether changes in parameters and scenarios affect the product‟s profitability
and the business viability.
5.3.2 Recommendations to Managers
Our findings, although based on one company, will permit manufacturing company‟s
management to realize the importance of unit costs in order to make informed
financial decisions. The use of break-even analysis will allow area managers to plan
minimum production capacity for the organization. Thus as far as CVP analysis is
concerned the researcher puts forward the following recommendations;
It is recommended that for analysis cost control purpose, workers should be
enlightened on the objectives of the organization and department estimates as
89
this would inspire in them a sense of recognition of their corporate importance
by the management.
In today‟s modern world of businesses and corporations, there is a common
goal shared throughout every industry; increase profits. With increases in
technology and developing methods, businesses are moving far lengths in
increasing their profits, or operating income. Controlling costs is the key to a
successful operation. The Cost Volume Profit Analysis is the recommended
paramount and most cost efficient way of doing so. It is also highly
recommended for the decision makers to grasp the understanding of the
economic consequences of cost structure, contribution margin, and break-even
sensitivity, to enable a business to create a decision model that enhances the
company‟s profitability
A brief delineate is necessary in understanding the Cost Volume Profit
analysis (or CVP) and creating a decision model. In a very general outlook,
the CVP looks at how fixed, variable, and mixed costs change with changes in
sales volume. The main goal is to determine what factors control costs and see
how management can use this information to improve planning and control
activity. After establishing a base, it is necessary for the company to identify
all fixed, variable, and overhead costs. This is not an easy task, as what is to
be considered one category of cost may change in a different environment.
Also, CVP analysis is important in using both life-cycle costing and target
costing. In lifecycle costing, CVP analysis is used in the early stages of the
90
product‟s cost life cycle to determine whether the product is likely to achieve
the desired profitability. Similarly, CVP analysis can assist in target costing at
these early stages by showing the effect on profit of alternative product
designs that have different target costs.
If a business increases its selling prices, the demand for its products is likely
to fall, unless the price increase coincides with an effective marketing
campaign. Similarly, a fall in price should stimulate extra demand and hence
volume produced, unless the market is saturated or superior alternatives are
available. Managers need to know how contribution and profits will change as
a result of a change in a product‟s selling price and the consequent change in
its sales volume.
In recent years, the increasing level of global competition has intensified the
challenges for managers and many experts have warned that if management
accounting is to maintain its relevance, it needs to adapt to meet the changing
needs of managers. In response to these concerns, a range of new management
accounting techniques has emerged (Chenhall and Smith, 1998). Traditional
management accounting techniques, such as absorption costing, standard
costing, traditional budgets, CVP analysis and profit-based performance
measures, focus on concerns internal to the organization. The more recent
management accounting tools, such as activity based costing (ABC), target
costing, value chain analysis and benchmarking have affected the whole
process of management accounting (planning, controlling, decision making,
91
and performance evaluation) and have shifted its focus from a “simple” or
“naive” role of cost determination and financial control, to a “sophisticated”
role of creating value through improved deployment of resources (Kaplan and
Atkinson, 1998; Otley, 1995; Haldma and Laats, 2002). Briedley et al. (2001)
argue that “given that notions such as “current practice” and “current state”
are situated in time and space there is a continuous need for empirical studies
to keep track of development Horngren et al. (2000) note that firms across a
variety of industries have found the simple CVP model to be helpful in both
strategic and long-run planning decisions. Furthermore, a survey of
management accounting practices indicates that CVP analysis is one of the
most widely used techniques (Garg et al., 2003). However, Horngren et al.
(2000) warn that, in situations where revenue and cost are not adequately
represented by the simplifying assumption of CVP analysis, managers should
consider more sophisticated approaches to financial analysis.
To help managers make better decisions, accountants should evaluate the
quality of the techniques they use, given the organizational setting and
decisions to be made. This evaluation helps determine when techniques such
as CVP analysis are likely to be an appropriate tool and how much reliance to
place on the results. The quality of information generated from an analysis
technique is higher if the economic setting is consistent with the technique‟s
underlying assumptions.
Managers need to consider the degree of operating leverage when they decide
whether to incur additional fixed costs, such as purchasing new equipment or
92
hiring new employees. They also need to consider the degree of operating
leverage for potential new products and services that could increase an
organization‟s fixed costs relative to variable costs. If additional fixed costs
cause the degree of operating leverage to reach what they consider an
unacceptably high level, managers are advices to often use variable costs such
as temporary labor rather than additional fixed costs to meet their operating
needs.
5.4 Areas for Future Studies
This study is just an eye opener for more investigations to come. The following areas
are worth consideration.
This study is based on few structured questionnaire in survey and some secondary
data. The performance of CVP analysis in manufacturing companies in Tanzania as a
management tool has been considered. But there is huge number of cost management
tools. Relevance, challenges, usefulness and satisfaction level have been considered
but what are the reasons behind it have not been concentrated. If the study considered
the qualifications of it, the finding might be different. This study lacks consideration
of other management accounting techniques used as management tools and also the
level of the qualifications of them towards justification of their responses. Also
merely manufacturing organization has been considered. The study open for further
research could consider the usage and satisfaction levels of service organizations also.
The researcher is not satisfied with the responses given on the factors affecting CVP.
As it is stated previously; the questions on the issue were surprisingly not understood
93
by some respondents. Further research which should clearly define the factors is
much-admired. It is the thought of the researcher that clear understanding of the
factors affecting CVP will help academicians along with policy makers to extend or
adjust the model to meet the desires of decision makers as well as to make it a reliable
tool for decision making.
The market led technology system by itself reduces the role of state in technology
decision making for a country. It is, therefore, important to find out the role of
regulatory organs in technology transfer and adaptation in a free market economy.
Technology is rapidly changing, and companies which adopt most advanced
technologies, gain competitive advantage, thus it will also be of value to find out how
local companies can gainfully utilize opportunities created by global market in the
country in order to improve own technological capabilities.
94
REFERENCES
Baradyana, J.S A and Ame, A.M (2005), Quantitative Techniques for Business
Decisions,University of Dar es salaam.
Baumol, W. J. (1959), Business Behaviour: Value and Growth, Macmillan, London
Baumol, W. J. (1972), Economic Theory and Operations Analysis. 3rd edition
Prentice Hall London
Baumol, W.J. (1962), “On the Theory of Expansion of the Firm” American Economic
Review, 52, pp 1078-1087.
Bhattacharyya, D. (2011), Management Accounting. Dorling Kindersley Pvt Ltd:
New Delhi, India.
Biddle G, C., Robert M. B., James S. W., (1997), Does EVA beat earnings? Evidence
on Associations with Stock Returns and Firm Values, Journal of
Accounting and Economics 24 301-336
Black J.A. & Champion D.J. (1976), Methods and Issues in Social Research. John
Wiley and Sons, Chichester
Burch, J.G. (1994), Cost and Management Accounting: A Modern Approach, West
Publishing Company, USA.
Burns, J., Ezzamel, M. and Scapens, R., (1999), Management Accounting Change in
the UK. Management Accounting 77 (3), 28-30.
Chen, S. and Dodd, J. (2002), Market Efficiency, CAPM, and Value-relevance of
Earnings and EVA: A Reply to the Comment by Professor Paulo. Journal
of Managerial Issues 14 (4): 507-512.
95
Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002), “The role of the business model in
capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation‟s
technology spin-off companies” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11,
no. 3, pp. 529-555.
Cottrell, R. R. & McKenzie, J. F. (2011), Health Promotion and Education Research
Methods: Using the Five-Chapter Thesis/Dissertation Model 2nd ed. UK:
Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Cox, J. F., III and John G. Schleier, Jr. (2010), The Theory of Constraints Handbook,
New York, McGraw-Hill, John Blackstone
Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000), Determining validity in qualitative inquiry.
Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131
Drury, C. (2004), Management and cost accounting, 6th ed. London: Cengage
Learning (formerly Thomson Learning)
Duncan, W. (1996), Cost and Management Accounting, 1st edition, Prentice
Dwivedi, D.N. (2008), Managerial Economics, 7th
ed. New Delhi, India.
Emmanuel, C., Otley, D. and Merchant, K. (1990), Accounting for Management
Control, (2nd edn), Wokingham, Van Nostrand Reinhold, UK.
Eugene F. B. Louis C. G. (1995), Intermediate Financial Management, 5th
edition,
Cengage Learning,
Farjana Yeshmin and Amran Hossan. (2011), Significance of Management
Accounting Techniques in Decision-making: An Empirical Study on
Manufacturing Organizations in Bangladesh World Journal of Social
Sciences Vol. 1. No. 1. March 2011. Pp. 148 – 164
96
Ferguson, R., J. Rentzler and S. Yu. (2005), Does Economic Value Added (EVA)
Improve Stock Performance Profitability? Journal of Applied Finance 15
(2): 101-113.
Garg, A., D. Ghosh, J. Hudick and C. Nowacki. 2003. "Roles and Practices in
Management Accounting Today." Strategic Finance 85 (1) : 30-35
Goldratt, E. M. and J. Cox (1984), The Goal, Great Barrington, MA, The North River
Press.
Goldratt, E. M., (1995), Critical Chain, Great Barrington, MA, The North River
Press.
Goldratt, E. M., (2008), The Choice, Great Barrington, MA, The North River Press,”,
Graham Ian C. and Peter J. Harris (1999), “Development of a Profit Planning
Framework in an International Hotel Chain: A Case Study,” International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, (Issue 5), pp. 198–204.
Hilton, R. W., Macher, M.W. and Selto F.H. (2003), Cost Management: Strategy for
Business Decisions, McGraw Hill Companies Inc, New York.
Hogan, C. and C. Lewis, (2005), "Long-run Investment Decisions, Operating
Performance, and Shareholder Value Creation of Firms Adopting
Compensation Plans Based on Economic Profit." Journal of Financial and
Quantitative Analysis 40 (4): 721-745.
Horngren C.T., Foster G., Datar S.M. (2000), Cost Accounting, Prentice Hall, New
Jersey
97
Horngren, Charles T., George Foster, and Srikant M. Datar (1991), Cost Accounting:
A Managerial Emphasis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Horngren, Charles T., George Foster, and Srikant M. Datar (1997), Cost Accounting:
A Managerial Emphasis. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
http://www. accountingCoach.com site visited on November, 2012
Jo Avis (2009), Performance Management: Managerial level, Elsevier
Johnson H.T. and Kaplan R.S. (1987), Relevance Lost: the Rise and Fall of
Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, US.
Johnson, H. Thomas, (1981), "Toward a New Understanding of Nineteenth Century
Cost Accounting." Accounting Review July, 1981.
Joppe M. (2000), "The research process", http://www.ryerson.ca./~mjoppe/rp.htm.
site visted on October 10, 2012
Joppe M.(2004), "The research process", http://www.ryerson.ca./~mjoppe/rp.htm.
site visted on October 10, 2012
Joshi, P.L. (2001), The international diffusion of new management accounting
practices: The case of India. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing &
Taxation, 10, 85-109
Kapil Sheeba (2011), Financial Management, Pearson Education, India
Kaplan, R. and Atkinson, A. (1998), Advanced management accounting, Harlow: FT/
Prentice Hall
Kombo D.K and Tromp D.L.A. (2006), Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction,
Pauline Publications Africa, Kenya.
98
Kothari, C. R. (2004), Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, 2nd
ed. New
Age International (P) Ltd, India
Kothari, C.R., 1985, Research Methodology- Methods and Techniques, New Delhi,
Wiley Eastern Limited.
Libby, T. and Waterhouse, J. H. (1996). “Predicting change in management
accounting systems” Journal of Management Accounting Research (8): 137-
150.
Lucey, T. (1996), Costing, 5th ed. Carnforth: Letts Educational
Luther, R. and Longden, S. (2001), Management accounting in companies adapting
to structural change and volatility in transition economies: A South African
study. Management Accounting Research, 12 (3). pp. 299-320. ISSN 1044-
5005
Luther, R. and O‟Donovan (1998), Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis and the Theory of
Constraints, Journal of Cost Management, Sep. /Oct., pp. 16-21. pp353 – 360
Mabin, V.J. and Balderstone, S.J. (1999), “The World of the Theory of Constraints: A
Review of the International Literature”. St. Lucie Press / APICS Series on
Constraints Management: Boca Raton, FL.
MacArthur, J.B. and Stranahan, H.A., (1998), “Cost driver analysis in hospitals: A
Simultaneous equations approach”, Journal of Management Accounting
Research (10): 279-312.
Machlup, F., (1955), The Problem of Verification in Economics, Southern Economic
Journal, 22: 1–21
Magdy Abdel-Kader and Robert Luther (2006), Management Accounting Practices in
the UK Food and Drinks Industry, University of West of England, Bristol
99
Magee, Robert P., (1975), Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis, Uncertainty and Capital
Market Equilibrium. Journal of Accounting Research 13 (Autumn): 257-266.
Management Decision, 39(7), 551-555
Manoj et al., (2005), Cost Management Practices in India: An Empirical Study:
Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad and Securities Exchange
Board of India.
McWatters, et al. (2001), Management Accounting: Analysis and Interpretation,
McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. New York.
Meigs, Robert F. (1998), Accounting: The Basis for Business Decisions, New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Migiro, S. Organisational Competitiveness and the Role of Management Accounting
Techniques in Decision Making. University of South Africa
Mohamed, E. (2006), Cost Information and Strategic Planning in the Egyptian
Private Sector. Elshahat, Enschede
Ndaliman, M.B and Bala, K. C (2007), Practical Limitations of Breakeven Theory.
Lagos
Noreen, E. Smith, D.A. & Mackey J.T. (1995), The Theory of Constraints and its
Implications for Management Accounting. The North River Press Publishing
Corporation: Great Barrington, MA.
Nweze, A. (1992), Quantitative Approach to Management Accounting; Lagos:
Computer Edge Pub
O‟Leary, Z. (2004), The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: SAGE
publication Ltd.
100
Ogbo, A.I. , Chukwudi C. O.& Adibe, T.N. (2012),Improving Production Planning
and Control through the Application of Breakeven Analysis in Manufacturing
Firms in Nigeria, Industrial Engineering Letters Vol 2, No.6,
Otley, D. and Berry, A. J., (1980), “Control, Organization and Accounting”.
Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol.5 No.2 231-244
Patton, M. Q. (2002), Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd
Ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Paulo, S. (2002), Operating Income, Residual Income and EVA: Which Metric is
More Value Relevant--A Comment." Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (4) :
500-506.
Philmore Alleyne. (2011), “An Exploratory Study of Management Accounting
Practices in Manufacturing Companies in Barbados” International Journal of
Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 9 [Special Issue - May 2011]
University of the West Indies
Robert et al. (2004), An Empirical Investigation of the Evolution of Management
Accounting Practices. University of Essex and University of Bristol.
Robson, C. (2003), Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and
Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975), Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences.
2nd ed. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Saunders et al., (2007), Research methods for business students. 4th ed. London:
Prentice Hall.
Saxena, V.K., and Vashist, C.D., (2007), Advanced Cost and Management
Accounting, 7th
edition, New Delhi: Sultan Chand and Sons.
101
Scarlett, B. (2005). Management accounting performance evaluation, 2006 ed.
London: CIMA Publishing
Schneider, A. (1992), Cost-Volume-Profit Models Containing Earnings-based Bonus
Expenses. Accounting Enquiries 2 (August): 168-190.
Smith A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
London UK, A selected edition editor: Kathryn Sutherland Oxford
Paperbacks Oxford UK.
Smith A. W. Strahan and T. Cadell. (1776), An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes
Of The Wealth Of Nations, London
Stenbacka, C. (2001), Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own.
Management Decision, 39(7), 551-555.
Stewart, G. (1991), The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers. New York,
NY: Harper Business.
Stewart, Thomas A. (1992), “Brace for Japan’s Hot New Strategy.” Fortune,
(September 2 1): 25-31.
Syed Maqbool-ur-Rehman. (2011), “Which Management Accounting Techniques
Influence Profitability in the Manufacturing Sector Of Pakistan?” Pakistan
Business Review
Toomas Haldma and Kertu Lääts (2002), Influencing contingencies on management
accounting practices in Estonian manufacturing companies; University of
Tartu, Estonia
Vickers, D. (1997), Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions,
and Policy, London: Greenwood, Praeger.
102
Wijewardena, H and De Zoysa, A, (1999), “Comparative analysis of management
accounting practices in Australia and Japan: An Empirical Investigation, The
International Journal of Accounting, 34(1), 1999, 49-70.
Wijewardena, H. and Zoysa, De A. (1999), Comparative Analysis of Management
Accounting Practices in Australia and Japan: An Empirical Investigation.
University of Wollongong
William M.K. Trochim (2006), Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base,
3rd
Ed. Cengage Learning Inc., London.
Winter, G. (2000), "A comparative discussion of the notion of validity in qualitative
and quantitative research: the qualitative report, Vo. 4, No: 3-4, Retrieved
February 25, 2013, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html
103
APPENDIX I:
QUESTIONNAIRE
Introductory part
Below are the questions for selected personal particulars. Circle the letter representing
the correct answer and if the correct answer is not provided, write the correct answer.
1. What is your sex?
a) Female
b) Male
2. What is your level of education? (indicate only the highest level)
a) Primary education
b) Ordinary secondary education
c) Certificate holder
d) Diploma
e) Bachelor degree
f) At least master degree
3. For how long have you been working with this organization?
a) Less than three yearS
b) 3 year -5 years
c) More than five years
104
4. What is your current position in this organization?
Job title………………………… …….. Department………………………………….
Part A: General understanding of Cost Volume Profit analysis
Tick the correct answer
1. Do you know anything about Cost volume Profit analysis? (a) Yes (b)
No
2. Is it true that costs and revenue have linear relationship? (a) Yes (b) No
3. Is volume the only driver of costs? (a) Yes (b) No
4. Do you separate your operating costs into fixed and variable categories
(a) Yes (b) No?
5. Which factors affects cost volume profit analysis (give only one answer).
(a) Volume
(b) Unit selling price
(c) Variable cost per unit,
(d) Total fixed cost, and
(e) Sales mix.
(f) All the above
6. Among the factors stated in question five above, which factor affects CVP the
most? (Give only one answer).
105
(a) Volume
(b) unit selling price
(c) Variable cost per unit,
(d) total fixed cost, and
(e) Sales mix.
Part B: CVP analysis and related challenges
1. Does your organization use cost-volume profit analysis as a tool for profit
planning and control? ? (a) Yes (b) No
2. If your answer in question 1 is yes, apart from cost volume profit analysis,
what other techniques do you employ in the profit planning and control?
(a) Budgeting (b) Return on investment(ROI) (c) Payback period (d) Net
present value (NPV) (d) Others
3. What problems does TPCC Company encounter in the profit planning and
control?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
4. Are the problems mentioned in question three result from the use of CVP
analysis?
(a) Yes (b) No
106
5. What is the main problem in using CVP analysis in decision making?
a) It is not understood
b) It is impracticable
c) It is difficult to apply
d) It is not effective
6. Do you use CVP analysis in long-term decisions making?
(a) Yes (b) No
Part C: CVP Analysis in Modern Business Environment
1. Which methods of production do you use? (give only one answer).
a) Capital intensive
b) labour intensive
c) capital and labour at equal mixture
2. What determines the price of your product (give only one answer).
a) production costs
b) demand and supply
c) competitor‟s price
d) combination of a, b, c and d above
3. Once the price is set, can it remain constant throughout the accounting period?
107
(a) Yes (b) No
4. Can CVP analysis help decision makers to measure the risks involved in the
business?
(a) Yes (b) No
5. Do you think CVP analysis is helpful in achieving your competitive goals?
(a) Yes (b) No
Part D: Budgeting and CVP Analysis
1. Do you consider the behaviour of costs in budgeting?
(a) Yes (b) No
2. Which type of budget do you use in the course of monitoring your operations?
(give only one answer).
a) Flexible budget
b) Static (master) budget
c) Both, flexible and static budget
3. Are budgets considered to be valuable tools in good management?
(a) Yes (b) No
4. Which type of budget can help decision makers to develop trends or the
pattern of business? (give only one answer).
a) Flexible budget
b) Static (master) budget
108
c) Both, flexible and static budget
5. Which method other than budgeting is used to control costs or for
performance evaluation? (give only one answer).
(a) Return on investment (ROI)
(b) Payback period
(c) Net present value (NPV)
Part E: Performance evaluation with CVP Analysis
1. Is there periodic performance evaluation of your operations?
(a) Yes (b) No
2. What is the basis your performance evaluation? (give only one answer).
a) Static budget
b) Flexible budget
c) Both, flexible and static budget
3. In what ways explicitly has the use of cost volume profit analysis facilitated
the organization to achieve efficiency and effectiveness?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………………
109
4. Is relevant range considered when undertaking performance evaluation?
(a) Yes (b) No
5. What is the frequency for performance evaluation of your operations?
a) Annually
b) semi- annually
c) Quarterly
110
ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE OF COST VOLUME PROFIT (CVP)
ANALYSIS IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN TANZANIA – A CASE
OF TANZANIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY (TPCC))
BY
RAHABU PHILIP NDONGOLO
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
THE UNIVERSITY OF DODOMA
JUNE, 2013