AGENDA - Grants Pass, OR
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of AGENDA - Grants Pass, OR
AGENDA
Housing Advisory Committee February 21, 2020 at 9:00 AM
The Housing Advisory Committee will hold their scheduled meeting on February 21, 2020 at Grants Pass City Hall – 101 NW ‘A’ Street, Grants Pass, OR – in the Courtyard Conference Room at 9:00 AM.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Doug Walker (Chair) Loree Arthur Sandra Villa Kelly Wessels (Vice Chair) Ralph “JR” Wheeler Sam Engel Teresa Santucci Jason Elzy Celeste Wilson David Corsi Duward Brown
STAFF/LIAISON MEMBERS: COUNCIL LIAISON: Lora Glover, Director Dwight Faszer II Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner
1. Roll Call
2. Introductions
3. Public Comment: This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission on items not related to a public hearing or action item. The intent is to provide information that is pertinent to the City’s jurisdiction. Each speaker will be given three minutes to address the Committee as one body, not to individuals. The Committee may consider items brought up during this time later in our agenda during Matters from Committee Members and Staff.
4. Approval of Minutes: January 17, 2020
5. Action Items a. Review Committee applicant applications (if applicable) b. Modify membership structure c. Joint Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and Housing Advisory Committee
(HAC) presentation to joint City Council and Josephine County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting (subcommittee)
d. Public Outreach subcommittee report e. System Development Charges (SDCs) subcommittee report f. Development Code barrier review (subcommittee)
6. Matters from Committee Members and Staff a. Committee members information sharing b. Council goal setting report c. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Forum d. Chamber of Commerce Housing Forum e. Rezone of Urbanizing area
7. Future Agenda Building for Next Meeting
8. Adjourn
Next Meeting: March 20, 2020
Housing Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes December 13, 2019
1
HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes – January 17, 2020 at 9:00 AM
Courtyard Conference Room
1. Roll Call:a. Chair Walker opened the meeting at 9:00 am and took roll.
2. Introductions:a. Guests present but name not provided.
3. Public Comment: (opportunity for citizens to share information with the committeeregarding items that are not on the agenda)
a. No comment4. Consent Agenda:
a. Minutes: December 13, 2019
MOTION/VOTE Member Brown moved and Member Santucci seconded the motion to approve the
minutes from December 13, 2019. The vote resulted as follows: “AYES”: Chair Walker, Vice Chair Wessels and Members Arthur, Corsi, Elzy, JR Wheeler and Wilson. “NAYS”:
None. Abstain: None. Absent: Member Engel, Villa The motion passed.
5. Action Items:a. Review Committee applicant applications (if applicable)b. January Committee Elections
• The HAC recommended Chair Walker and Vice Chair Wessels retaintheir respective positions.
MOTION/VOTE Member Elzy moved and Member Santucci seconded the motion to approve the minutes from December 13, 2019. The vote resulted as follows: “AYES”: Chair Walker, Vice Chair Wessels and Members Arthur, Brown Corsi, JR Wheeler and
Wilson. “NAYS”: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Member Engel, Villa The motion passed.
c. System Development Charges (SDCs)
• City staff provided a presentation about proposed SDC changes.
Committee Member Doug Walker – Chair Kelly Wessels – Vice Chair Loree Arthur Duward Brown David Corsi Jason Elzy Sam Engel Darin Fowler Andrew Luther (absent) Teresa Santucci JR Wheeler Celeste Wilson Sandra Villa (Absent)
Staff/Council Liaisons: Dwight Faszer II – Council Liaison Lora Glover – Parks and Community Development Director Bradley Clark – Principle Planner Taylor Graybehl – Assistant Planner
Guests: Brian (last name unknown)
Exhibit 4: Page 1
Housing Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes December 13, 2019
2
• Topic was held about reduction or waiving of SDCs.
• The HAC created a subcommittee which will discuss the topic in moredetail and bring back recommendations to the HAC.
d. Incentives for 50-100 or more units of affordable housing (30% or less of medianincome)
• Reviewed Collaborative Economic Development Committeerecommendation and noted its role within a housing plan.
e. Create a flexible fund for multi-family housing (deregulate the lodging tax fromAirbnb or school district excise tax exemptions)
• Reviewed Collaborative Economic Development Committeerecommendation and noted its role within a housing plan.
f. Host Pop-up events out of town to attract developers (promoting city servicesand incentives)
• Reviewed Collaborative Economic Development Committeerecommendation and noted its role within a housing plan.
g. Aligning goals for housing units and utilize surplus land owned by county locatedin city
• Reviewed Collaborative Economic Development Committeerecommendation and noted its role within a housing plan.
h. Review Council Goal Setting Speech
• Vice Chair Wessels gave a brief synapsis of what will be said during theupcoming presentation before Council for their goal setting.
i. Property Surplus Subcommittee
• Reviewed recommendations provided by a subcommittee which met priorto the meeting and adopted their recommendations.
MOTION/VOTE Member Corsi moved and Chair Walker second the motion to adopt the recommendations found in the attached memo for the future use and
disposals of the lands recognized in the PAVE audit. The vote resulted as follows: “AYES”: Vice Chair Wessels, Members Arthur, Brown, Elzy, Engel, Santucci, Wilson “NAYS”: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Members Luther,
Villa, Wheeler The motion passed.
6. Matters from Committee Members and Staff:a. Public comments from the Severe Rent Burden Forum
• Public comment was reviewedb. Review development procedures
• This topic was deferred to a later date.7. Future Agenda Building for Next Meeting:
a. Modify membership structure
b. System Development Charges (SDCs)8. Adjournment
a. Chair Walker adjourned the meeting at 10:53 am.
Next scheduled meeting: Friday, March 20, 2020 @ 9:00 am in the Courtyard Conference Room.
Minutes prepared by Taylor Graybehl, City of Grants Pass Parks and Community Development.
Exhibit 4: Page 2
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner [email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: 2/21/2020
SUBJECT: Modify Membership Structure
As Primary Health no longer provides services in Grants Pass, member Andy Luther has stepped down from his position which filled an “ex-officio member” role of a representative from a Coordinated Care Organization. Attached to this document is the current member roster, where you can see Primary Health held the position “representative from Coordinated Care Organization” 3. b..
The Housing Advisory Committee should provide a recommendation to Council for a new ex-officio organization.
************************************************************************
As requested by feel free to contact me with any specific questions.
Exhibit 5.b: Page 1
HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1. Committee Name: Housing Advisory Committee
2. Purpose and Duties: The Housing Advisory Committee explores opportunities to facilitateprovision of housing for all income levels, and it makes recommendations to the City Council.
The Housing Advisory Committee promotes public awareness of housing resources andpromotes public participation in identifying and addressing housing issues and needs.
The City Council may authorize the Housing Advisory Committee to conduct those publichearings specified in the City’s CDBG citizen participation plan, which are not reserved to theCity Council for decision-making.
3. Type: Advisory Committee
4. Number of Members: 12 voting members (6 ex-officio, 6 appointed by City Council)
5. Appointments and Special Qualifications / Criteria for Membership:
A. Ex-Officio Members. Ex-officio members shall be the Director or Chief Executive Officer(CEO) of the specified organization, or the Director’s/CEO’s designated representative fromthe organization.
1. 1 Representative from Josephine Housing and Community Development Council(JHCDC), (a “housing choice voucher”- only public housing agency)
2. 1 Representative from United Community Action Network (UCAN)3. 1 Representative from each Coordinated Care Organization (CCO), as follows:
a. 1 Representative from AllCareb. 1 Representative from Primary Health
4. 1 Representative from the Housing Authority of Jackson County (HAJC), (a full-servicepublic housing agency)
5. 1 representative from Habitat for Humanity6. 1 representative from Josephine County
B. Positions Appointed by City Council. The following members shall be appointed by CityCouncil:
1. 1 representative from an organization that develops and/or operates housing, transitionalhousing, short-term housing, or shelter for special needs (e.g. Options, OnTrack, Kairos,Women’s Crisis Support Team, Hearts With A Mission, Gospel Rescue Mission, etc.)
2. 1 representative from a financial institution/lender3. 1 representative who is the owner of rental property4. 1 representative who is a residential developer5. 1 representative who is a renter in the LMI (low to moderate income category)6. 1 citizen at large
6. Terms: Ex-officio members will serve on the committee while holding the position specified inSection 6 and may designate an alternate to serve in their absence. Ex-officio members maychoose a different designated representative from the specified organization to serve on thecommittee at any time and shall notify the City Manager. City Council-appointed members willserve staggered 3-year terms.
7. Staff Support: Lora Glover, Parks & Community Development Director
Exhibit 5.b: Page 2
8. Council Liaison: Dwight Faszer, II Ex-Officio Members
Name Address and Email
Phone No.
Term Appointed
Term Expires *
Category
Teresa Santucci
Alt: Tammy D’Amico
Josephine Housing & Community Development Council
1205 NE Seventh Street (26)
541-479-5529
Ext 111 09/06/17 N/A
A-1
Kelly Wessels
(Vice Chair)
Alt: Justina Fyfe
UCAN
PO Box 2380 (28)
541-956-4050
Ext 4470 09/06/17 N/A A-2
Sam Engel
Alt: Josh Balloch
AllCare Health
1701 NE 7th St (26)
541-471-4106 09/06/17 N/A A-3 (a)
Andy Luther
Alt: Jennifer Johnstun
Company has disolved
Primary Health
1867 Williams Highway, Suite 108 (27)
541-471-4207 09/06/17 N/A A-3 (b)
Jason Elzy
Alt: Ryan Haynes
Housing Authority of Jackson County
2251 Table Rock Rd, Medford 97501
541-779-5785 09/06/17 N/A A-4
David Corsi
Alt: Steve Guiliford
Habitat for Humanity
PO Box 2667 (28)
541-479-3351 09/06/17 N/A A-5
Josephine County N/A A-6
*Ex-officio members may choose a different designated representative from the specified organization to serve on the committee at any time and shall notify the City Manager. Ex-officio members shall be the Director or Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the specified organization, or the Director’s/CEO’s designated representative from the organization. Members Appointed by City Council
Name Address and Email
Phone No.
Term Appointed
Term Expires *
Category
Loree Arthur 737 NW Kinney St (26)
[email protected] 541-441-3270 10/16/19 09/06/22 B-6
Celeste Wilson 1891 Medart Lane (27)
[email protected] 951-906-3732 10/16/19 09/06/22 B-3
Duward Brown
Options for Southern Oregon
1215 SW G St (26)
541-441-6171 09/06/17 09/06/20 B-1
Doug Walker
(Chair)
1144 SW Lee Ln (26)
[email protected] 541-660-2178 09/06/17 09/06/20 B-4
Ralph “JR” Wheeler
245 Bannister Lane (26)
541-292-1004
541-955-8005 12/19/18 09/06/21 B-2
Exhibit 5.b: Page 3
Sandra Villa 720 SE M Street (26)
[email protected] 541-295-8193 11/20/19 09/06/21 B-5
*Initial terms are one, two, or three years to establish staggered terms. Thereafter, terms will all be three-year terms.
Exhibit 5.b: Page 4
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner [email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: 2/21/2020
SUBJECT: Joint Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) presentation to joint City Council and Josephine County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting (subcommittee)
Members of the Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and the Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) meet February 18, 2020 to discuss an upcoming presentation to be held on March 30th, 2020.
A joint meeting will be held on March 30th between Grants Pass City Council and Josephine County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Both the Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and the Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) will be provided 30 minutes to present to the joint party.
Minutes of the meeting are attached.
************************************************************************
As requested by feel free to contact me with any specific questions.
Exhibit 5.c: Page: 1
Present: Brad Clark, Doug Walker, Susan Seereiter, Taylor Graybehl, Jean Ann Miles, Julie Thomas, Gene Merrill, Sam Engel
Opened: 10:37
Meeting
Members of the Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and the Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) meet February 18, 2020 to discuss an upcoming presentation to be held on March 30th, 2020.
A joint meeting will be held on March 30th between Grants Pass City Council and Josephine County Board of Supervisors. Both the Collaborative Economic Development Committee (CEDC) and the Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) will be provided 30 minutes to present to the joint party.
Minutes:
Doug Walker: Asante and Chamber will deliver a letter about the importance of housing; staff will prepare the quote about the 1.5 jobs created per LIHTC project per the blue-sky study. There should be a focus on the development of surplus properties with higher density projects to bring more housing and ensure Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion. Higher densities are less costly. It is important that the properties being sold have a minimum density. Future zoning should consider density minimums.
It’s important to have a presentation to ensure a point is brought across and not too much time is taken by conversation.
Outcome: we want an action to be taken by the Council and Board of Commissioners
The CHIP should be mentioned as part of the conversation. This is important because it shows how the healthcare industry is recognizing housing as a determinant of health.
There is concern that economic impacts of housing haven’t been touched enough which might be important for council.
The lack of housing is making it difficult for employers to attract employers (health care, school, etc)
Consider the waving of System Development Charges (SDCs) for certain income levels.
CEDC would like to see RFPs for City properties within the City.
Outcome: recommend that staff prepare RFPs for public lands to develop projects which meet recommended standards.
Presentation should be at least 15 minutes. Follow this process: What is the problem > why do we care? (employment, businesses/shopping, schools, veterans) > now what? (what are some actions that should be taken?)
Minimum densities (or transportation-oriented development) along transit lines to ensure expansion
RFP can seek pilot projects that could make use of project-based voucher programs.
Exhibit 5.c: Page: 2
There needs to be outreach outside of the market to bring in developers.
RFPs can seek to reduce the price of property or waiving of development requirements.
Consider use of land trusts, neighborhood cleanup, and receivership to revitalize areas of the City.
How do we incentivize the conversion of underutilized properties to housing? Currently, there is no density maximum to housing in commercial zones. This can help drive businesses back into the downtown (SDCs reduction, property tax reduction, MULTE, TOD)?
How does SB 608 effect rents?
How can we support work force housing?
Can we increase maximum heights?
Can transient lodging tax be used for funding of housing?
Potential Funding Sources: Construction Excise Tax (CET), MB 102, Marijuana Tax, General Fund, private donations, utility bill, work with banks to create a private fund.
Cottage Unit Developments – the City was one of the first municipalities to adopt this tool why has no one brought a project under these standards?
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Taylor Graybehl at 541-450-6080 or [email protected].
Exhibit 5.c: Page: 3
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner [email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: 2/13/20
SUBJECT: Outreach Subcommittee
The outreach subcommittee has conducted three (3) meetings since its creation with members Engel, Santucci, Walker, and Wessels present at least one meeting.
So far, the subcommittee has discussed the creation of a housing forum where service providers, non-profits, other interested groups, and the City of Grants Pass would table and give presentations. If found to be important by those hosting the forum, a forum would best fit into the City’s Citizen Participation Plan for the creation of a Consolidated Plan before April 15th.
The City can partner with other organizations to put on a forum by helping with notification but cannot take lead. It is still not clear who will take lead or if the forum will be pursued.
Attached are minutes from previous meetings.
************************************************************************
Feel free to contact me with any specific questions.
Exhibit 5.d: Page 1
Public Outreach Subcommittee – CDBG Needs and Priorities Minutes 9-11
Attendees: Anne Ingalls, Brad Clark, Kelly Wessels, Sam Engel, Scott Lindberg, Taylor Graybehl
• It’s difficult to get people to come to the meetings, the HAC can champion apublic forum to bring more people.
• We can allow for discussion groups and organize the forum to be moreinclusive. Include stations or other means of engagement during the forum.
• Examine the ECONorthwest forum held in Grants Pass to find ways toincorporate the public.
• Provide the history of what CDBG has accomplished to show the public howit has worked.
• Ask the sub-recipients: what has worked and what hasn’t?• There isn’t a perfect time for sub-recipients but having two meetings and
different times is important for the public.• There should be the same core at both meetings to ensure conformity
between meetings.• Provide at least 30 days of notice.
Exhibit 5.d: Page 2
• Have childcare or welcome families. • Collaborate with other groups to allow for other hosts (this would allow for
funding for meals or childcare). • Tell the public, “We want to achieve much better, your input will funds
allocations.” • This can be an opportunity for those receiving funds (sub-recipients) to get
more public outreach, donations, provide services, and enroll people in services.
• This can be educational about CDBG AND about the programs which help those with needs in the community.
• Those who receive funding can make an argument to the community that they need additional donations. This can lead to more relationships to meet the goals of the HAC.
• The City should present the legal requirements quickly and leave the remaining time to conversations.
• Bullets of information, food, tabling, childcare. • Businesses lack the technical skills but are often willing to donate (food,
space, etc). • Can we get sponsors from the community? • Can we get the schools to share the difficulties faced by homeless children
and how CDBG or other programs can help? • There were more champions which were very visible for the food bank, but
this hasn’t been translated to housing. • Admit the difficulties of the food bank but let people know we have learned
and are going to address housing. • Do we have possible projects in the community which we could allocate
funding to? • Use the foundry village as an example of CDBG and the difficulties of the
program. • Education about housing needs to be provided to all levels of the
community because most are stuck in a single-family dwelling mindset.
Takeaways
• Have an interactive public forum.
Exhibit 5.d: Page 3
• Utilize partners in hosting the forum, this can help provide food and childcare.
• Allow sub-committees to do outreach because some programs. need funding outside of what the government can provide.
• Brief discussion on the technicalities of CDGB. • Use Foundry Village as an example. • Own up food bank, say we have learned a lot, and now intend to focus on
housing. • Have two meetings, one in the day and one at night. Insure that there is the
same core at each meeting. • We need champions to address the subject. • The forum needs to be fun. • Educate about social determinants of health and how it relates to CDBG.
Questions and Next Steps
• Who will help host/facilitate? o A source outside the City may be more technically skilled at
facilitating, permits more interaction for City staff, other groups can bring in funding which the City would not have.
• Where should the forum be it be hosted? o Will someone donate/rent a place for a discount? o Can a school host?
• What topics will be covered? o Brief bullet point on CDBG, Foundry Village lessons, Food Bank
lessons. o What other topics?
• How should the forum should be ran? o Presentation by City, presentation by other groups, tabling/input
session? o What other actions should take place during the forum? Like
vaccines, flu shots, signing up people for services. • When should the forum be hosted?
o Can we have the event in tandem with another event? o Have two meetings one during the day and one during the night.
Exhibit 5.d: Page 4
• Can we receive donations from other entities? o Food, child care, etc.
• Outreach? o How do we inform people the event is happening? o How do we get media to run with the program? o Can we get connected Champions on board?
Blue Zones o We need to get Rotary involved.
• Who else should be there? o This can provide the group with more community outreach?
• What other co-benefits can arise during this forum? o Getting data from attendants, etc. o Vaccines o Sign people up for services
Exhibit 5.d: Page 5
CDBG – Needs and Priorities Forum Minutes 12-11-19
Attendees: Anne Ingalls, Justina Fyfe, Susan Seereiter, Teresa Santucci, Taylor Graybehl
Item 1 – When and Where
• Do on the 25th of February around 6:00 pm. • 6:00 pm is when City council meetings are held so people are used to the time and they have
had some time off work. • This can be done at the senior center. This project heavily utilized CDBG and is a neutral
location. • RVCOG – contact point (Michael Cavallaro or Peter Town) • Not on a Wednesday or during another City meeting. Tuesday is a good day for public energy
level. • February 4th , 11th , 25th (11th is the SOREDI meeting)
o The 25th is great because it provides us the opportunity to present the time at other functions throughout the month.
Item 2 - Who
• Having all the subrecipients present has really helped in previous CDBG presentations and can help make clear the importance of CDBG.
• Personally invite private sector donors who can assist the subrecipients with further fund raising.
• Personally invite representatives of other communities • Housing Advisory Committee • RVCOG – they need to make clear how important CDBG money was for the project. They can
share how to SUCCESSFULLY complete a project. • HUD Liaison • Elected Officials (Local and State) – Dwayne Stark • Church’s – what’s on their wish list? • Governor’s office, DLCD, LCD, • JCCN – Todd Bloomquest and Peter Buckley • Chamber, Rotary Club • What other groups are doing presentations around this time period?
Item 3 – Forum Content
• There needs to be a facilitator, to guide discussion. • We should make focus groups (round tables) around each eligible activity which are represented
by individual members on the HAC (or some other group that is representative). Consider previous recipients as well.
• Show previous allocation of funding and what is not being used.
Exhibit 5.d: Page 6
• Explore how to better utilize weatherization (this program is complicated and difficult to use at the individual site level).
• Food, beverages, childcare • Ask the public to assist with childcare (senior center)
Next Steps:
• Reserve the Senior Center – RVCOG Michael Cavallaro • Develop Outreach Program
o Recipients o Officials?
• Develop agenda o Planning will need to develop an agenda o We will break into the three separate categories o Will each group be provided the opportunity to share their program?
• Provide materials o What materials? o Who will pay?
• Find a facilitator
Exhibit 5.d: Page 7
Housing Forum Minutes 1-27-20
Attendees: Anne Ingalls, Cat Bonnie, Doug Walker, Grant Stutzman, Sam Engle, Scott Lindberg, Susan Seereiter, and Teresa Santucci
There has been tentative agreement for use of the Foods and Friends Center on Feb 25th at 6 – 8.
The HAC needs to have a vote on the topic.
The forum will be postponed.
We can have a forum as late as May 15th.
Item 1 – Develop Outreach Program
• The City can assist with public outreach on Facebook and other City pages. • Common Connections
Item 2 – Develop Agenda
• There would be multiple groups with tables, and they would make short presentations about what they have accomplished and help sign up for services.
Item 3 – Materials
• We need to explore this more.
Item 4 – Find a Facilitator
• Who will do this?
Next Steps:
Add to HAC agenda time to discuss CAPER review Add item to HAC agenda to adopt some sort of public outreach program to assist with creation
of a Housing Forum
Exhibit 5.d: Page 8
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner [email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: February 21, 2020 SUBJECT: System Development Charges (SDCs) Exceptions
Who met? Jason Elzy, Teresa Santucci, DJ Faszer, David Corsi, Doug Walker What are System Development Charges? As our community grows, old systems need to be updated and new systems must be built. System developments charges are on way to fund those improvements. SDCs are required to ensure equitable share of the cost of services and City-wide improvements. Current SDCs and Proposed The applicant is responsible for any System Development Charges (SDCs) including but not limited to, transportation, parks and storm drain, payable at the time of building permit or at time of Certificate of Occupancy, if deferred. Residential development faces different system development charges based on the size of the unit and number of units proposed in the development. The table below is for multi-unit projects of 4 units or more. Multi-unit residential development undergoes a .64 modifier to reduce charges when compared to commercial or industrial projects. System Development Charge Current Proposed Parks (per unit) $894.71 $894.71 Sewer (per unit) $2,070.40 $1,700.00
Storm (project site) $525.11 per
development project $.0274 per sf of new impervious surfacing
Water (project site) Based on water meter size 1.5" $17,813 $20,024 2.0" $28,500 $32,038 3.0" $57,004 $64,077
Transportation Based on project type Multi-Low Rise - 1 to 2 stories (7.32 trips
per unit $119.56/trip $119.56/trip
Multi-Medium Rise - 3 to 10 stories (5.44 trips per unit) $119.56/trip $119.56/trip
Affordable Housing - determined through trip generation report
$119.56/trip $119.56/trip
Attached is a System Development Charges brochure which provides the current fees associated with a single-family, duplex, and triplex development.
Exhibit 5.e: Page 1
Recommendations The SDC exception program should have a 5-year window to reevaluate the program and make any necessary changes. Projects deemed affordable at 80% AMI should have a 100% waiver of SDCs with a 30-year deed restriction. Projects deemed affordable at 80-120% AMI should have a 50% waiver of SDCs with a 20-year deed restriction. Penalties One concerned raised in the meeting was penalties for breaking the agreement associated with the exception exemption. Staff spoke with the City of Ashland and found that they are facing this issue with two properties. Ashland’s current agreement has an SDC recapture with interest clause and a foreclosure clause, which they believe they will be required to use with one of their cases. One property is renting their unit (when not permitted) to unqualified renters (income too high) and the other using their unit as a vacation rental. The above-mentioned vacation rental owner has refused to pay the SDC’s + inflation amount due, so foreclosure may have to be sought. Ashland wishes there was some sort of clause that allowed for a fine because this person is fine with renting the property at +$2000 a month instead of the agreed maximum of $750. So, the violator brings $1,250 in excess a month knowing it will take months for the legal proceedings to conclude her to pay back the $10,000 with interest she owes. As the legal proceeding is expected to take a period of time the dwelling owner will likely make the $10,000 or more back before the hearing. Ashland believes a fee could act as a deterrent and allow for short term enforcement of violations. Why? The Housing Element of the Grants Pass Community Comprehensive Plan lays out the number of housing units which need to be built to meet the needs of the community to 2023. It appears the required density and percentage of multi-family units developed has not met. Please read the attached “Housing Element Housing Production Expectations” memo for further details. SDC exceptions are one tool to see required housing development is met. ************************************************************************ As requested by the Housing Advisory Committee feel free to contact me with any specific questions.
Exhibit 5.e: Page 2
SY
ST
EM
D
EV
EL
OP
ME
NT
C
HA
RG
ES
Fees E
ffective
Ja
nu
ary
1, 2
020
thro
ug
h
Decem
ber 3
1, 2
020
Th
is bro
chu
re is on
ly a
gu
idelin
e fo
r an
ticipa
ting
poten
tial sy
stem
cha
rges fo
r new
dev
elop
men
t an
d
is sub
ject to ch
an
ge.
Wh
at a
re SD
Cs?
T
he C
ity o
f Gra
nts P
ass is com
mitted
to p
rovid
ing
quality
service
s to o
ur co
mm
unity
. A
s our co
mm
unity
gro
ws, o
ld sy
stem
s need
to b
e up
dated
and
new
syste
ms m
ust b
e built.
Syste
m D
evelo
pm
ent C
harg
es are one w
ay to
fund
th
ose im
pro
vem
ents.
S
yste
m D
evelo
pm
ent C
harg
es (SD
Cs) are fees
imp
osed
up
on n
ew
and
exp
an
din
g d
evelo
pm
ent w
ith-
in th
e City
of G
rants P
ass and
the u
rban
izing area
that co
nnects to
or o
therw
ise will u
se City
services o
f th
e water sy
stem
, sanitary
sew
er syste
m, p
arks,
streets and
storm
drain
age.
T
he o
bjectiv
e of S
DC
s is to ch
arge n
ew
users a
n
equitab
le share o
f the co
st of serv
ices and
to p
ay fo
r im
pro
vem
ents n
ecessary
as a resu
lt of in
creased d
e-velo
pm
ent an
d d
em
and
on th
e C
ity’s in
frastructu
re.
SD
C F
ee Ad
op
tion
&
Ad
justm
ents
O
n Ju
ly 1
7, 1
991 th
e City
of G
rants
Pass ad
opted
an o
rdin
ance allo
win
g
the creatio
n o
f system
dev
elop
men
t ch
arges. S
DC
s are now
in p
lace to
fund th
e Water, S
ewer, P
arks, S
torm
D
rain an
d T
ransp
ortatio
n S
ystem
s.
On Jan
uary
2, 2
002, th
e Council
adopted
a resolu
tion estab
lishin
g C
ost
of L
ivin
g (C
OL
A) A
dju
stmen
ts for
SD
Cs.
For fu
rther a
ssistan
ce…
If yo
u w
ould
like m
ore
info
rmatio
n o
n
System
Dev
elop
men
t Ch
arges
call (541
) 450-6
06
0.
Sto
rm D
rain
Sy
stem
Sto
rm W
ater and
Op
en S
pace S
DC
’s were ad
op
t-ed
by th
e City
Co
uncil o
n F
ebru
ary 4
, 20
04
. At th
at
time, tw
o sep
arate charg
es were created
, one ap
ply
-in
g to
all land
s with
in th
e urb
an g
row
th b
ound
ary,
and
one sp
ecifically
limited
to p
rop
erties whic
h fall
with
in th
e San
d C
reek D
rainage B
asin.
T
he S
torm
Water an
d O
pen
Sp
ace SD
C’s are an
in
curred
charg
e for th
e pla
nnin
g, acq
uisitio
n an
d
capital d
evelo
pm
ent o
f facilities to acco
mm
od
ate and
co
ntro
l storm
water ru
no
ff, directly
associated
op
en
space, an
d w
ater quality
con
trol facilitie
s to clean
su
rface water ru
no
ff prio
r to retu
rn to
natu
ral surface
water co
nveyan
ces.
S
torm
Drain
SD
C’s are d
ue a
nd
pay
able u
po
n
issuan
ce of a b
uild
ing p
ermit fo
r any n
ew
con
struc-
tion o
r exp
ansio
n w
hich
creates ad
ditio
nal resid
ential
units a
nd
any co
nstru
ction w
hich
exp
and
s or rem
od
-els a b
usin
ess build
ing w
hic
h in
clud
es an
increase in
im
perv
ious su
rface of 2
5%
or m
ore.
The S
torm
Drain
and
Op
en S
pace P
lan S
DC
F
or resid
ential an
d co
mm
ercial d
evelo
pm
ent is
$5
25
.11
per d
evelo
pm
en
t perm
it. T
he S
and
Creek
Drain
age B
asin S
torm
Drain
SD
C
Fo
r residen
tial and
com
mercia
l dev
elop
men
t is $0
.36
p
er squ
are
foo
t of th
e lot o
r imp
rov
em
ent.
T
his b
roch
ure is in
tend
ed to
be u
sed as a g
uid
e-lin
e on
ly fo
r estimatin
g S
ystem
Develo
pm
ent
Charg
es as a part o
f total p
roject co
sts. Actu
al costs
for y
our p
roject m
ay d
iffer du
e to site sp
ecific re-
quire
ments.
It d
oes n
ot in
clud
e info
rm
atio
n o
n o
ther fee
s w
hich
ma
y b
e du
e inclu
din
g P
lan
nin
g R
eview
F
ees, E
ng
ineerin
g F
ees, B
uild
ing
Per
mit F
ees,
Wa
ter a
nd
Sew
er C
on
nec
tion
Fee
s, Reim
bu
rse-m
en
t District F
ees a
nd
Bu
siness L
icenses.
P
lease contact th
e Park
s & C
om
mu
nity
Devel-
op
ment o
ffice at (54
1) 4
50
-606
0 fo
r info
rmatio
n o
n
SD
C’s sp
ecific to y
our p
roject an
d in
form
ation o
n
oth
er po
tential co
sts. W
ho
to co
ntact at C
om
mu
nity
Dev
elop
ment:
O
ur P
lannin
g D
ivisio
n can
assist yo
u w
ith
questio
ns o
n S
torm
Drain
, Park
s and
Tran
spo
rtation
SD
C’s.
O
ur B
uild
ing P
ermit T
echnic
ian can
assist yo
u
with
Water an
d S
ew
er SD
C q
uestio
ns a
nd
esti-m
ates.
Visit o
ur w
ebsite a
t: h
ttp://w
ww
.gran
tspasso
rego
n.g
ov
***N
EW
On
line F
ee Estim
ato
r***
h
ttps://g
pw
eb.g
rantsp
assoreg
on
.go
v/
En
erGov_P
rod/S
elfServ
ice#/estim
ate
Park
s & C
om
mu
nity
Dev
elop
men
t office is lo
cated
at:
101 N
W A
Street
Upstairs, R
oo
m 2
02
G
rants P
ass, Oreg
on
97
52
6
(541) 4
50-6
06
0
O
pen
8 am
– 5
pm
Monday
– F
riday
B
uild
ing C
ounter H
ours 8
– 1
0 am
M –
F
(Sub
mitta
l Hours 8
– 1
0 a
m &
2 –
4 p
m M
– F
) P
lannin
g C
ounter H
ours 8
– 5
pm
M –
F
Exhibit 5.e: Page 3
Park
s
T
he C
ity o
f Gra
nts P
ass has a
do
pted
two
SD
Cs
for P
arks.
T
he P
arklan
d A
cquisitio
n S
DC
was ad
op
ted b
y
the C
ity C
ou
ncil o
n Ju
ne 3
0, 1
99
7. T
he S
DC
pay
s fo
r the p
urch
ase o
f park
land
, trails, and
op
en sp
ace fo
r the p
arks a
nd
recreation m
aster plan
.
O
n D
ecem
ber 1
8, 2
00
6 th
e City
Co
uncil ad
op
ted
a Park
Dev
elop
men
t SD
C e
ffectiv
e June 1
, 20
07
. T
his S
DC
will h
elp fu
nd
capital im
pro
vem
ents an
d
dev
elop
men
t of th
e park
, trail and
op
en sp
ace sys-
tem
.
P
arks S
DC
s are due an
d p
ayab
le up
on issu
ance
of a b
uild
ing p
ermit fo
r: any n
ew
constru
ction o
r ex
pan
sion w
hich
creates ad
ditio
nal resid
entia
l units;
any co
nstru
ction w
hic
h creates a n
ew
bu
siness
build
ing o
r enlarg
es a b
usin
ess build
ing; o
r issuance
of th
e first man
ufactu
red h
om
e placem
ent p
ermit
gran
ted u
po
n a
n in
div
idual b
uild
ing lo
t.
T
he P
arks S
DC
s for resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t is b
ased o
n th
e nu
mb
er of u
nits:
Park
land
Acq
uisitio
n …
……
$4
96
.17
per resid
ence
Park
Dev
elop
men
t ……
……
$3
98
.54
per resid
ence
To
tal p
er u
nit $
89
4.7
1
T
he P
arks S
DC
s for n
on
-residen
tial dev
elop
-m
ent is b
ased u
po
n th
e nu
mb
er o
f pro
vid
ed p
arkin
g
spaces b
uilt to
serve th
e dev
elop
ment.
Park
land
Acq
uisitio
n …
…. $
45
.43
per n
ew
park
ing
space b
uilt
Park
Dev
elop
men
t ……
…. $
35
.47
per n
ew
park
ing
sp
ace built
To
tal p
er p
ark
ing
spa
ce $
80
.90
The C
ity C
ouncil ad
op
ted R
esolu
tion 1
5-6
33
8 to
estab
lish th
e Park
s SD
C rates. T
hese rates are a
30
% red
uctio
n fro
m th
e prev
ious rates.
See o
ther sid
e for S
torm
Dra
in
SD
C In
form
atio
n
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
T
he T
ransp
ortatio
n S
DC
was ad
op
ted b
y th
e C
ity C
ou
ncil o
n S
epte
mb
er 15
, 19
99
. The T
ransp
or-
tation S
DC
help
s to p
ay fo
r the ex
pan
sion an
d cap
i-tal d
evelo
pm
ent o
f the tran
spo
rtation sy
stem
to ac-
com
mo
date an
d co
ntro
l mo
torized
veh
icular traffic,
ped
estrian traffic, an
d b
icycle traffic.
In
Sep
tem
ber 2
01
1, th
e City
Co
uncil ad
op
ted
Ord
inan
ce 55
46
whic
h id
entifies th
e meth
od
of cal-
culatin
g th
e SD
C’s to
be b
ased o
n th
e Institu
te of
Tran
spo
rtation E
ngin
eers Trip
Gen
eration R
epo
rt. T
rips are calcu
lated b
ased o
n th
e Land
Use a
nd
T
itle that b
est fits the D
evelo
pm
ent as in
terpreted
b
y th
e City
. If the IT
E T
rip G
eneratio
n R
epo
rt in-
clud
es multip
le mea
sure th
at can
be u
sed to
deter-
min
e avera
ge d
aily trip
generatio
n in
clud
ing area,
the m
easu
re of sq
uare fo
ota
ge (area) w
ill be u
sed.
The D
irector m
ay co
nsid
er an altern
ative trip
calcu-
lation w
hen a rep
ort is su
pp
lied
by a licen
sed traffic
engin
eer and
said altern
ative is rev
iew
ed an
d ap
-p
roved
by th
e City
En
gin
eer.
T
he T
ransp
ortatio
n S
DC
is du
e and
pay
able at
the tim
e of b
uild
ing p
ermit issu
ance fo
r constru
c-
tion.
T
he C
ity C
ouncil ad
op
ted R
esolu
tion 1
5-6
33
8 to
estab
lish th
e curren
t Tran
spo
rtation S
DC
trip rate.
This rate is a 3
0%
reductio
n fro
m th
e prev
ious rate.
In
certa
in ca
ses, a cr
edit m
ay
be a
pp
lied to
-w
ard
s the T
ran
spo
rtatio
n S
DC
for p
revio
us u
ses o
n th
e site. Plea
se con
tact P
lan
nin
g fo
r an
esti-m
ate o
f the T
ran
spo
rtatio
n S
DC’s fo
r you
r pro
-ject.
Belo
w is a
n ex
am
ple u
sing
the $
11
9.5
6/trip
ra
te:
Sin
gle F
am
ily R
esiden
ce
Categ
ory
: Sin
gle
-fam
ily (9
.57
trips/u
nit)
1 u
nit x
9.5
7 trip
s/unit x
$1
19
.56
/trip =
$1
,14
4.1
9
Sew
er Sy
stem
T
he S
ew
er SD
C w
as first ad
op
ted b
y th
e City
C
ou
ncil o
n O
ctob
er 19
, 19
94 an
d last a
mend
ed o
n
Dece
mb
er 18
, 20
19
. The S
ew
er SD
C is ch
arged
an
d p
ayab
le for d
evelo
pm
ent at th
e time o
f perm
it to
connect to
the se
wer sy
stem
.
S
ew
er S
DC
s fo
r resid
ential
use
are b
ased
o
n
dw
elling size as fo
llow
s:
Sin
gle F
am
ily (S
F) o
r Ma
nu
factu
red H
om
e:
Sm
all (<=
1,7
00
sf)……
……
……
……
…... $
2,2
00
S
tand
ard (1
,70
1—
2,9
00
sf)……
……
……
. $
3,2
35
L
arge (>
2,9
00 sf)…
……
……
……
……
…..
$ 4
,432
Du
ple
x
(x1
.64
of S
F a
mo
un
t ba
sed o
n d
wellin
g size):
Sm
all (<=
1,7
00
sf)……
……
……
……
. $
3,6
08
.00
S
tand
ard (1
,70
1—
2,9
00
sf)……
……
. $
5,3
05
.40
L
arge (>
2,9
00 sf)…
……
……
……
…..
$ 7
,268
.48
Trip
lex
(x
2.2
8 o
f SF
am
ou
nt b
ased
on
dw
elling
size):
Sm
all (<=
1,7
00
sf)……
……
……
……
. $
5,0
16
.00
S
tand
ard (1
,70
1—
2,9
00
sf)……
……
. $
7,3
75
.80
L
arge (>
2,9
00 sf)…
……
……
……
…..
$1
0,1
04
.96
S
ew
er SD
Cs fo
r com
mercial, p
ub
lic and
quasi-
pub
lic dev
elop
men
t are determ
ined
by th
e nu
mb
er o
f fixtu
re units an
d stren
gth
of d
ischarg
e. A w
ork
-sh
eet is
availab
le to
estim
ate th
e se
wer
SD
C fo
r in
div
idual p
rojects.
Wa
ter Syste
m
T
he
Water
SD
C
was
first ad
op
ted
by
the
City
C
ou
ncil o
n A
ugu
st 21, 1
991
and
last amen
ded
on
De-
cemb
er 18
, 20
19
. It is charg
ed an
d p
ayab
le for d
evel-
op
men
t at the tim
e of p
ermit to
conn
ect to th
e water
syste
m.
T
he m
etho
d o
f calculatin
g th
e Water S
DC
for resi-
den
tial dev
elop
men
t is based
on
dw
elling an
d w
ater m
eter size , as follo
ws:
Sm
all (<
= 1
,70
0 sf)
3/4
” Meter…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
$ 2
,081
1” M
eter……
……
……
……
……
……
….
$ 5
,202
1.5
” Meter…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
$1
0,4
04
Sta
nd
ard
(1,7
01—
2,9
00
sf) 3
/4” M
eter……
……
……
……
……
……
.. $
3,0
60
1” M
eter……
……
……
……
……
……
….
$ 7
,650
1.5
” Meter…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
$1
5,2
99
La
rge (>
2,9
00 sf)
3/4
” Meter…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
$ 4
,192
1” M
eter……
……
……
……
……
……
….
$1
0,4
80
1.5
” Meter…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
$2
0,9
60
T
he m
etho
d o
f calculatin
g th
e Water S
DC
for n
on
-resid
ential d
evelo
pm
ent d
epen
ds o
n w
hat W
ater Pres-
sure Z
on
e service area th
e dev
elop
men
t is conn
ecting
to, as fo
llow
s:
Wa
ter Pressu
re Zo
nes 1
, 2&
3:
(ba
sed o
n w
ater m
eter size)
3/4
” ……
….. $
3,0
60
1” …
……
…. $
7,6
53
1-1
/2” …
….. $
15
,311
2” …
……
…. $
24
,502
Wa
ter Pressu
re Zo
nes 4
, 5 &
up
: (b
ased
on
wa
ter meter size)
3/4
” ……
….. $
3,5
61
1” …
……
…. $
8,9
05
1-1
/2” …
….. $
17
,813
2” …
……
…. $
28
,500
Water
meter size req
uired
for
yo
ur p
roject can
vary
an
d is site sp
ecific please co
ntact o
ur o
ffice for actu
al co
st for y
ou
r con
nectio
n.
Exhibit 5.e: Page 4
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner [email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: February 21, 2020 SUBJECT: Housing Element Housing Production Expectations
What is a Comprehensive Plan? The foundation of land use planning in Oregon is a set of 19 Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. The goals express the state's policies on land use and related topics, like citizen involvement, housing, and natural resources. Oregon's statewide goals are achieved through local comprehensive planning. State law requires each city and county to adopt a comprehensive plan and the zoning and land-division ordinances needed to put the plan into effect. Goal 10: Housing Goal 10 requires cities to complete an inventory of buildable residential lands and to encourage the availability of adequate numbers of housing units in price and rent ranges in line with the financial capabilities of its households. Element 9: The Housing Element The Housing Element of the Grants Pass Community Comprehensive Plan addresses the requirements of Goal 10. The primary goals of the chapter are to (1) describe characteristics of the existing mix and density of housing in Grants Pass, (2) describe recent residential development trends in the City, (3) evaluate housing affordability, and (4) project future need for housing in Grants Pass. This chapter was last updated in 2014 to reflect the Josephine County Coordinated Population Forecast 2014 update. This update recalculated the needs for housing units, group quarters, and residential land needs for housing. New Housing Units by Type Table 1-2 (below) shows the needs for housing units by planning periods and housing type, based on updated population forecasts. These needs are broken out by a 2008 housing element update, an update in 2009, and the 2014 update.
Exhibit 5.e: Page 5
To meet housing needs during this UGB expansion (from 2013-2033) it is expected that a total of 5,643 dwelling units are produced of which 1,411 (25%) are from multi-unit development. Required Development Density Table 1-5 (below) shows the updated needs for housing units, with the needed number of housing units shown by plan designation. This is broken out by a 2008 housing element update, an update in 2009, and the 2014 update. The 2014 update shows the expected number of dwelling units that need to be developed over different time frames and expansions of the City urban growth boundary (UGB) to meet forecasted population needs. The distribution and percentage of housing types assigned to each plan designation, and the resulting average density by plan designation, uses the same basis as the original Housing and Urbanization Elements.
What has been built? To meet the City’s housing needs, the range of development densities within the UGB should meet the targets found in Table 1-2 and 1-5. It is important to track and
Exhibit 5.e: Page 6
periodically review development to ensure the housing needs of the City are being met. This helps to ensure a diverse housing inventory that meets the needs of different incomes, family sizes, lifestyles, and geographic preferences. Additionally, if adequate housing is not provided, it may lead to a housing shortage and higher housing prices. The table below shows the number and type of units produced during 2019, the shaded sections indicate single-family units. Housing Type: Produced Units: Single Family 103 Manufactured Home 17 Duplex 10 Triplex 1 Fourplex 0 +5 Units 0
In 2019, 120 single-family (91%) units and 11 multi-family (8.4%) dwellings were produced. The City failed to meet the 25% ratio of multi-unit development, stated in Table 1-2, to supply its housing needs. What’s next? The City will calculate development density by plan designation to see if the targets have been met. If the average gross density developed does not meet those found in Table 1-5 then it may be necessary to adopt tools, incentives, or other land use regulations to ensure an adequate number of dwelling units are provided which meets the types and affordability levels for the citizens of Grants Pass. ************************************************************************ As requested by the Housing Advisory Committee feel free to contact me with any specific questions.
Exhibit 5.e: Page 7
2020 Top Priorities
Three Star Priority
104 Develop housing incentives for multi-family units
75 Restore/replace Caveman Pool
72 Pass a Police/Fire levy November 2020
60 Develop and implement a Housing Action Plan
60 Install additional security cameras throughout the park system
57 Facilitate establishment of drug treatment facility, utilizing federal grant funding
54 Prevention focused community policing to help reduce crime and build public trust
51 Identify park infrastructure priorities
51 Install sidewalks and crosswalks near the intersection of Foundry and Booth streets
Two Star Priority
46 Expand Building Renovation Grant Program
46 Collaborate and support extending sewer system in North Valley Industrial Park)
42 Implement a new online city utility customer service platform and communication system
40 Develop tree canopy program
32 Install a bike pump track at Beacon Hill Park
32 Develop Riverside Park Community building
28 Partner with private sector to develop shovel ready land
28 Establish art facilities program
Exhibit 6.b: Page: 1
One Star Priority
13 Evaluate/implement LED exterior street lighting upgrades
13 Food truck event in early autumn
12 Establish public parking facility within downtown business district
8 Safe routes to schools and parks
8 Utilize technology and social media to produce positive outcomes relative to improvements in Public Safety practices
8 Continue Water Restoration Plant rehabilitation – Digester re-hab
7 Complete Allen Creek Trail
6 Work with the County and ODOT to find solutions to the South Y, Redwood Hwy. and Fairgrounds traffic issues
6 Focus on Park connectivity and trail heads
6 Welcome Center façade improvements
6 Develop a historic design overlay for the area bounded by Lawnridge Ave., Washington Blvd., A and Savage streets
4 Art Box Project
Exhibit 6.b: Page: 2
WE ARE SEEKING
YOUR INPUT!
What are the most important needs and priorities for
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds
for the new 5-Year Consolidated Plan for 2020-2024?
How did CDBG 2019-2020 activities address the
needs of the City’s
lower-income households?
The City of Grants Pass would like to hear from you. Please join us for the following:
Public Workshop
& Open House -Needs and Priorities-
Wednesday, April 1, 2020 @ 6pm Grants Pass City Hall, Courtyard Room 108
101 NW ‘A’ Street, Grants Pass
City Council
Public Hearing -Needs and Priorities-
Wednesday, April 15, 2020 @ 6pm Grants Pass City Council Chambers
101 NW ‘A’ Street, Grants Pass
• Learn about the CDBG program & how funds can be used
• Ask Questions – staff will be on hand
• Share Your Thoughts and Ideas about community needs, priorities, and activities that might be assisted with CDBG funds for the new 5-Year Consolidated Plan for 2020-2024
• Let Us Know how CDBG or other publicly funded activities implemented in 2019-2020 addressed the needs of the City’s predominantly lower-income households
• Provide Verbal and/or Written Input
regarding community needs, priorities, and activities that might be assisted with CDBG funds for the new 5-Year Consolidated Plan for 2020-2024
• Provide Verbal and/or Written Input about how CDBG or other publicly funded activities implemented in 2019-2020 addressed the needs of the City’s predominantly lower-income households
Please join us for this public open house in an informal setting. There will be a brief presentation at the beginning. Review information, share your thoughts, talk with staff, participate in a discussion, and provide your input at the meeting and/or later.
This public workshop is to share information and receive input. No decision will be made at this workshop.
Written comments may be submitted before the hearing, and written and verbal comments may be provided at the hearing. Verbal comments are limited to three minutes per person. If you have extensive comments and would like to speak at the hearing, you may wish to submit written comments and provide a verbal summary.
This public hearing is to receive input. No decision will be made at this hearing.
Each year, the City of Grants Pass receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to be used for projects which predominantly benefit low- to moderate income persons, prevent/eliminate blight, or meet urgent community needs which pose a serious threat to the health, safety and welfare of citizens.
In 2015, the City adopted a 5-Year “Consolidated Plan” which guides use of CDBG funds over the next five years. Each year, the City prepares a 1-Year Action Plan to allocate annual grant funds for specific activities to address identified needs.
The City will be preparing a new 5-Year “Consolidated Plan” for 2020-2024 and a new Year 1 Annual Action Plan for 2020-2021. To assist with development of the plans, the City would like your input to help identify critical housing and community development needs and priorities. Help us identify how CDBG or other publicly funded activities will address the needs of the City’s predominantly lower-income households.
The City will also be completing an annual evaluation and performance report regarding last year’s CDBG program. Let us know how CDBG or other publicly funded activities implemented during 2019-2020 addressed the needs of the City’s predominantly lower-income households.
Please plan to participate with your comments and suggestions! Written comments may be submitted at the workshop or public hearing, or any time before the hearing by either:
Mail or Hand-Delivered During Business Hours:
Grants Pass CDBG Comments Attn: Scott Lindberg, Grant Specialist
101 NW ‘A’ Street Grants Pass OR, 97526
Via E-mail:
[email protected] with “CDBG Comments” in the subject line.
(no later than 5pm on the day of the hearing)
If you have questions, or if you would like further information, please contact the Grants Pass Parks & Community Development Department at 541-450-6060, or Scott Lindberg, Grant Specialist at 541-450-6015 or [email protected].
In order to accommodate persons with any special physical or language accommodation, please notify the City Recorder’s Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. To request these arrangements, please contact Karen Frerk, City Recorder, at (541) 450-6000.
YOUR PARTICIPATION IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!
TO: Housing Advisory Committee
FROM: Taylor Graybehl, Assistant Planner
[email protected] 541-450-6080
DATE: 02/20/2020
SUBJECT: Rezone of Urbanizing Area
Background
The City of Grants Pass has hired JET Planning and 3J consulting to work collaboratively to
support City staff on the Urbanizing Area (UA) rezoning process. The City desires to rezone
existing rural properties within the adopted Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to support
coordinated, urban-level development, particularly needed residential development. The
project will not include annexation of the properties within the UA.
The rezoning effort will focus on the properties within the City’s UGB that are outside the
city limits, known as the Urbanizing Area, excluding properties already designated with the
Zoning Transition Overlay (ZTO) that applies future City zoning. Those properties zoned
County rural zoning will adopt zoning designations that meet the City’s adopted
Comprehensive Plan designations.
The UA rezoning project is anticipated to follow directly after adopted of the TSP, consistent
with Goal 14 Urbanization goals and policies adopted in the City’s 2014 Comprehensive Plan
requiring preparation of the updated TSP.
Project Schedule
The following schedule has been proposed for Urbanizing Area Rezone Project.
(see next page)
Exhibit 6.e: Page 1