A Critical Reflection on the Political Nature of the British Museum's: 'Modern Japan Room'
Transcript of A Critical Reflection on the Political Nature of the British Museum's: 'Modern Japan Room'
Situated in the uttermost heights of the British
Museum, the ‘Modern Japan’ room is the last of three
rooms that together, trace a chronology of Japan
‘From prehistory to the present’. This essay takes
great interest in how the British Museum has
constructed the ‘modern’; through exploring both the
political discourses that may have shaped the
construction of the room and the political
ramifications of the way in which the works are
presented, this essays aims to offer a brief, yet
critical examination of the politicised nature of the
‘Modern Japan’ room. It is not the aim of this essay
to dismantle the narratives under discussion, but to
highlight the explicit and implicit ways in which the
Museum is complicit in their maintenance.
As the final of three rooms, the Modern Japan
room suggests a tangible chronology to the history of
Japan. Most interestingly, the Modern room places
particular emphasis on recollections of Anglo-
Japanese relations and ascetically ‘western’ Japanese
artworks. One plaque, named ‘Japan Opens, 1853-68’,
situated at the entrance to this room appears to
signal the start of Japan’s modern period. It
describes how the United States coerced Japan in
opening its shores to trade, which caused great
political change leading to the Meji restoration and
its related era.
Artworks in the room such as a woodblock
depicting the first British residence in Yokohama,
Japan, bolster the notion that modernity is
inextricably linked to western influence. As the
Museum itself writes, the focus of the modern room
is: ‘…nation-building and empire, city and Country
and freeing the Self’ (Great British Museum, 2006).
However, the most enduring theme is Anglo-Japanese
interaction. Another plaque, ‘Cultural Exchange 1862-
1912’ places great importance on the ‘significant
cultural exchanges’ Japan made in this period,
bolstering the notion that western consumption of
Japanese culture is in part a validation of Japan’s
entry into the modern age.
Further presentations of conflations of ‘East and
West’ comes in the form of Kojō Kōkan’s ‘Near the
Bank of England (1930), a landscape painting of
London in the traditional Nihonga technique ‘with a
modern flair’, it seems as though ‘modern’ implies a
western ascetic influence. Another example is
‘Spiritual Force’, by Sukita Masayoshi and David
Bowie, depicting David Bowie clad in avant gardé
Japanese clothing. This is problematic. Bowie has
notoriously appropriated various Japanese cultural
artefacts throughout his career, in an attempt to
make his characters more alien. Literally speaking,
his ‘Ziggy Stardust’ character who specifically wore
Kabuki-influenced garments on his ‘Aladdin Sane’ tour
was an extra-terrestrial. By promoting this
appropriation as a cultural milestone for Japanese
fashion, the museum is again validating the
aforementioned notion of western absorption as entry
into modernism (Oda, 2009, pp. 39-42).
In light of these examples, the room can be seen
as Orientalist for the following reasons: as an
institution with the ability to mould cultural
discourse through the information it disseminates in
its socially-accepted position as an arbiter of
‘historical truth’, the small collection of work
perpetuates: the fetishisation of Japanese culture by
western artists; the adoption of western techniques
and locations by Japanese artists; the forced trade
incited by the west and a plethora of west/east
interactions as the most important signifiers for
Japan’s entry into modernity. Indeed, not only does
this help to obscure the Orientalist history of
British interaction with Japanese culture,
perpetuating and validating it; it also paints the
history of Japan in favourable colours. The political
impact of this collection is that Japan’s entry into
modernity was merely due to the interactions of
western and eastern culture, not the economic or
political developments occurring within Japan at the
same time.
It has been suggested that Japan’s entry into
modernity could be better explained through the
enacting of its Imperial agenda and the adoption of
Industrial capitalism following the Meji Restoration
(Sewell, 2004, pp. 216-222). It is, of course; not
within the Museum’s best interests to portray this
alternative, scholarly narrative; the appearance of
German Chancellor Angela Merkel on the day the
research for this essay was undertaken shows the
important place the British Museum has in aiding
cultural links and the Imperialist, Capitalist
Japanese narrative is less bombastic and flattering
than one including Bowie and Manga. As Neil
MacGregor, former Director of the British Museum
comments, the British Museum is a place: ‘…Where many
of the world's cultures can come to write their
narratives of history…’ (Sylvester, 2009, p. 10).
While this may hold some truth, curators also hold in
mind how the collection will be received in the
respective country when forming coherent historical
exhibitions, which undoubtedly influences the
historical validity the exhibitions hold.
In conclusion, the modern Japan room in the
British Museum is spuriously suspect. While
attempting to show a thematic and chronological link
between its three rooms, the size of the exhibition
is so small, that the impact of the art chosen is
magnified, exemplifying its political ramifications.
The art itself is coherent in the narrative it
constructs; interactions between Japan, the United
Kingdom and the USA are marked as the beginning of
Japanese modernity while more infrastructural
economic and political changes in Japan are ignored.
Worryingly, albeit in one case; the appearance of
David Bowie, an artist often criticised for cultural
appropriation of Japanese culture, validates the
historic and contemporary fetishisation of Japanese
culture, bringing the integrity of the room, as a
curated construct; into question.
BibliographyGreat British Museum. (2006, October 18). Japan from prehistory to the present The Japanese Galleries reopen at the British Museum. Retrieved December 20, 2014 from The British Museum: http://www.britishmuseum.org/about_us/news_and_press/press_releases/2006/japanese_galleries_reopen.aspx
Oda, C. (2009). Yellow Fever: Orientalism in Popular Music from the 19th century to the 21st century. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
Sewell, B. (2004). Reconsidering the Modern in Japanese History: Modernity in the Service of the Prewar Japanese Empire. Japan Review , 16, 213-258.
Sylvester, C. (2009). Cultures, Nations, and the British Museum . InC. Sylvester, Art/Musems: International Relations Where We Least Expect It. London:Paradigm Publisher: Boulder.