-- fa 10 - FEC

I II.)RAI LI LC I ION COI\NI SION

WASHK IC11N0C 20401

N.x

THIS IS THE EUND OF 1'!UR P.'

ate Filmed

Cameraman

g36/79 Camera No. --

-I

Ii

*. ti

* I

I'

U

3

U

*4*

C,

,-1

L1

-'--4.T~

1.

-- fa 10

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1325 K S I R[FI N.W.

4 WASHING [ONI).C. 20461

June 25, 1979CERTIFIED MAILRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

James F. SchoenerJenkins, Nystrom & Sterlacci, P.C.2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

On June 15, 1979, the Commission voted to terminateits investigation in MUR 820. A copy of the Commission'sdetermination is enclosed for your information. Ac-cordingly, the Commission intends to close its files inthis matter.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincer

William C. OldakerGeneral Counsel

Enclosure:

Commission certificationGeneral Counsel's Report

C/ 4 SENDER Co Ieteitms I S1 3a fevAdd you addr*Sg in the "RETURN To, 402 an1. The following service is requested (check one),0 Show'to whom and date delivered.....1-1I Show to whom. date, and address of delivery.~El RESTRITE DELIVERYShow to whom and date delivered..

Z F]1 RESTRICTED DELIVERYm Show o whomdate, and address of delivery $_(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)z 2 ARICE ADDRESSEDT

3.TICLE DESCRIPTION:Q REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED No,W/S (Al ways obtain signature of adgn or 8aSIm)DI have received the article described above.-SIGNATURE l Addressee El Authorized agent4 x

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SIREkI N.W.

4 ~ WASHING [ON,DAC. 20463

CERTIFIED MAILRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:



Sincerely,


Enclosure:

Commission certification

SI 7C

FEDERAL. ELECTION COMMISSION1 Q5 K SIRU I N.W.

4 WASHING ION,[).(. 2040

June 25, 1979


James Howard Stewart, Jr.Friends of Donald Stewart Committee3701 Knoliwood DriveAnneston, Alabama 36201

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Stewart:

On June 15, 1979, the Commission voted to terminateits investigation in MUR 820. A copy of the Commission'sdetermination is enclosed for your information. Ac-

LE'I cordingly, the Commission intends to close its files inthis matter.

If further information comes to your attentionwhich you believe establishes a violation of theFederal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended,please contact me.

incerely,

Willia C.OldakerGeneral Counsel

Enclosure:

Commission certificationGeneral Counsel's Report

*

'~ SEDERComPgete items 1, 2, and 3.Add Your addressl in the "RETURN TO" space on

reverse-1. The following Service is requetd(hc n)0 [Show to whom and date delivered ....0 Show tb) whom, date, and address of del ivery, .

L0E- RESTRICTED DELIVERY

nnShow to whom, date, and address of delivery.$_j (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)-2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO--

3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION:REGISTERED NO. I CERTIFIED NO /N$$g4Vo.


1.12 5 K S IRkLH N.WWASHINGIONL).C. 20463

T4rS ot


James Howard Stewart, Jr.Friends of Donald Stewart Committee3701 Knoliwood DriveAnneston, Alabama 36201

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Stewart:



Sincerely,

William C. Oldaker

General Counsel

Enclosure:


S

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SIREET N.WWASHING ION,D.C. 20463

MEMORAND)UM1 TO

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CHARLES STEELE

MARJOR.IE Wi. EMIMONS

JUNE 22, 1979

MUR 820 - Letters to Respondent andCom~olainant - Memorandum

from O(nC dated 6-20-79:Received in OCS 6-20-79, 2:37

The above-named document was circulated on a 24

hour no-objection basis at 11:00, JTune 21, 1979.

The Commission Secretary's Office h-as receivled

no objections to the draft letters in relation to MUR 820

as of 12:30 this date.

June 20, 1979

MEMORAN4DUM TO: Marge Emnmons

FROM: Elissa T. Garr

SUBJECT: MUR 820

Please have the attached memo and letters distributed

to the Commission on a 24 hour no-objection basis.

Thank you.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1 Q5 K S IKIF[ I N.W.VVASI IING ION,ID.C 20461

'9 JUN?0 P2: 37

June 20, 1979

MEMORANDUM TO: THE COMMISSION

FROM: WILLIAM C. OLDAKE

SUBJECT: LETTERS TO RESPODENT AND COMPLAINANTMUR 820

Attached are draft letters to Respondent's attorney,James F. Schoener, and Complainant, James Howard Stewart, Jr.,notifying them of the Commission's decision to close thefile in this matter.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION135K SI R1I N.W.

WASHiING IONIIC. 20463


James Howard Stewart, Jr.Friends of Donald Stewart3701 Knoliwood DriveAnneston, Alabama 36201

Committee

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Stewart:



Sincerely,


Enclosure:


,WON

~- -~--~-..4e-.. - - -..--- ~ -~

V -~ ~ -- '-,- - -. --. ~-...---.- .. ,-


1325 K SIRI I- NWWA\SHING ION,I .C. 2046.3



Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

On June 15, 1979, the Commission voted to terminateits investigation in MUR 820. A copy of the Commission'sdetermination is enclosed for your information. Ac-

cordingly, the Commission intends to close its files inthis matter.


Sincerely,


Enclosure:


BEFORE THIE FE[ERAL EIECTICN~ CCONMISSIOt4

In the Matter of)MUR 820 (78)

National Republican Senatorial)Com~mittee

CERTIFICATICN~

I, Marjorie W. Emmons, Secretary to the Federal Election Ccnrmission,,

certify that on June 14, 1979, the Commission, meeting in an executive

session at which a quorum was present, took the following actions in the

above-captioned matter:

1. Failed by a vote of 2-3 to pass a motion to amend Recommlendation#3 of the General Counsel's June 6, 1979 report in MUR 820 (78)to read as followqs:

3. Find reason to believe that the Republican NationalCawnittee and the National Republican SenatorialCommittee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(h) bymaking contributions to James Martin of Alabamaduring the calendar year 1978 in excess of thelimitations of that provision of the ACT."

Camimissioners, Harris and Mc~Garry voted affirmatively for themotion. Comissioners Aikens, Friedersdorf, and Thanson dissented.Commissioner Tiernan abstained.

2. Determined by a vote of 6-0 to approve the General Counsel 'srecommendation to take no further action in connection withthe National republican Senatorial Corirnttee (NRS1~Cs possibleviolation of 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) in connection with the Senatorialcamrpaign of Jamrs Martin of Alabama.

3. Failed by a vote of 2-3 to pass a motion to adopt the GeneralCounsel 's recomendation to find reason to believe that theNational Republican Senatorial Committee may have violated2 U.S.C. §434 by reporting expenditures made in connection withthe Alabama Senatorial primary, and made prior to the time NRSCwas the designated agent of Rt~C, as coordinated expenditures under2 U.S.C. §441a(d), 11 C.F.R. §110.7(a) (4).

Ccommissioners Harris and Mc~Garry voted affirmatively for the motion.Comrmissioners Aikens, Friedersdorf, and Thomson dissented.Comrmissioner Tiernan abstained.

Federal Election Comi~hIssion. Page 2Certification for IvUR 820 (78)June 14, 1979

4. Failed by a vote of 2-3 to adopt the recoimmendation of theGeneral Counsel to find reason to believe that the NationalRepublican Senatorial Ccawittee may have violated 2 U.s.c.S44la (h) by making contributions to James Miartin of Alabamaduring calendar year 1978 in excess of the limitations of thatprovision of the Act.

cmissioners Harris and Mc~Garry voted affirmatively for themo~tion. Ccrmissioners Aikens, Friedersdorf,, and Thomson dissented.Ccmnissioner Tiernan abstained.

5. Passed by a vote of 4-2 a notion to close the file in MUR 820 (78).

Ccumissioners Aikens, Friedersdorf, Thomnson, and Tiernan votedaffirmatively for the motion. Ccrmissioners Harris and MckGarryabstained.

Accordingly, the file has been closed on MUR 820 (78).

Attest:

Date OMarjorie W. Enrrns,Secretary to the Caunission

EXECUTIVE SESSIONJune 14, 1979

FEDERA[ ELECTION COMMISSIONI Q5 K S IR1 I I N.W.WAASH IN( ION,I, . 20401

June 13, 1979

MEMORANDUM TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

THE COMMISSION

WILLIAM C. OLDAK~'

GENERAL COUNSEL /REVISED PAGE 7 FOR GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORTON MUR 820

As per a discussion in the Commission meeting on Tuesday,attached is a revised page 7 of the General Counsel's Reporton MUR 820. Please substitute this revised page for the page7 presently in your copy of this report. As you know, this matterhas been held over for discussion in the Commission meetingtomorrow.

0BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of)) MUR 820 (78)

National Republican)Senatorial Committee)

GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT

on December 13, 1978, the Commission found reason to

believe that the National Republican Senatorial Committee

(NRSC) may have violated 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d) by making ex-

penditures in connection with the Senatorial Campaign of

James Martin of Alabama in excess of the § 441a(d) limita-

tions published by the Commission. The Commission's

published calculations for party spending limits for Senatorial

contests limit the national and state committees of the

Republican Party to spending no more than $62,506.94 each on

behalf of a Republican candidate for Senate in the state of

Alabama. If the National Republican Senatorial Committee

acted as the authorized agent of both the National Republican

Committee and the Alabama Republican Party, its total spending

limit on behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatorial campaign

was $125,013.88. NRSC reported a total of $196,355.85 in

§441a Cd) expenditures on behalf of the Martin campaign.

In response to questions submitted by the Office of

General Counsel, NRSC furnished:

-2-

1. Letters from the Republican NationalCommittee authorizing NRSC to make S 441a(d)expenditures in connection with theMartin campaign -

(A) Letter dated 09/05/78 - $10,000.(B) Letter undated - $52,000.(C) Letter undated - $60,000.(D) Letter undated - $ 1,000.

2. Agreements with the Alabama RepublicanExecutive Committee authorizing NRSC to makeS 441a(d) expenditures in connection withthe Martin campaign -

(A) Agreement dated 08/22/78 - $60,000.(B) Agreement undated - $62,000.

3. Affidavit of Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer, NRSC,in which Mr. Smith states that he supervised

NO and directed the expenditure of S 441a(d)PO funds in connection with the Martin campaign

as authorized by the Republican NationalCommittee and by the Alabama Republican Ex-ecutive Committee. Mr. Smith further stated

!r) that such expenditures were made "properly andin accordance with Commission Advisory opiniondam, 1978-19."1

C As stated, NRSC reports disclose a total of $196,355.85 in

S441a(d) expenditures in connection with the Martin campaign.

The affidavit of Rodney A. Smith and additional enclosed ma-

terials allocate $73,370.55 to the Martin Campaign for the

Sparkman Senate Seat (Sl1 and $122,985.30 to the Martin Cam-

paign for the Allen Senate Seat (S2 . Mr. Martin was a can-

didate for the Sparkman Seat until October 2, 1978, when he

announced his candidacy for the Allen seat. NRSC purports

to apply AO 78-19, the "Fraser AO", in its application of

separate S 441a(d) expenditure limits to the two Martin races.

0-3-

Thus, NRSC contends that it could spend a maximum of $122,000

in connection with S1. as authorized by the Republican National

Committee and the Alabama Republican Executive Committee, and

$123,000 in connection with S 2' as authorized.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

The Commission's Advisory opinion 78-19 was in response

to a request made by the Fraser Senate Committee concerning

the application of FECA to transfers between principal campaign

committees for Candidate Fraser in his campaign for two

separate Senate races. The Commission noted that

[t]he Act specifically permits, and exemptsfrom contribution limits, the transfer of fundsfrom the principal campaign committee of acandidate seeking one Federal office to theprincipal campaign committee of the samecandidate who seeks another Federal office.2 U.S. C. § 44 la (a) (5) (C) .

The Advisory Opinion then concluded that FECA's disclosure

threshold and contribution limitations would apply to any

contributions transferred by one such principal campaign com-

mittee to the other.

Advisory Opinions rendered by the Commission apply -a

general rule of law to a specific factual situation. 2 U.S.C.

§ 437f(a). And any advisory opinion rendered by the Commission

may be relied upon by

(a) any person involved in the specific trans-action or activity with respect to which suchadvisory opinion is rendered; and (b) any per-son involved in any specific transaction oractivity...

2 U.S.C. § 437f(b)(2). See also 11 C.F.R. § 112.5.

-4-

Thus, it would appear that the Martin principal

campaign committee for S 1 could properly rely on AO 78-19

in its transfer of funds to the Martin principal campaign

committee for S 2 F that being "indistinguishable in all its

material aspects" from the activity in AO 78-19. However,

NRSC's expenditure of S 441a(d) funds in connection with

Marin' S1 adS2 capaigns would seem to be materially dif-

ferent from transfers between two principal campaign com-

mittees.

The question then becomes whether, absent AO 78-19, as

precedent, NRSC could successfully interpret the language of

the statute, 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d), to impose limitations on

party coordinated expenditures in connection with general

election campaigns for specific Senate seats rather than in

connection with general election campaigns of specific

candidates. In other words, could NRSC, consistent with

§ 441a(d) spend up to $122,000, as authorized by RNC and AREC,

in connection with the Sparkman Senate seat and $123,000, as

authorized, in connection with the Allen Senate seat even

though James Martin was the Republican candidate supported by

NRSC in both races. Or was NRSC limited by § 441a(d) to spend-

ing no more than $122,000, as authorized, in connection with

James Martin's Senatorial campaign whether that be for the

Sparkman seat or the Allen seat.

-5-

The language of the statute is less than clear in this

regard. Section 44la(d) imposes limitations on expenditures

"in connection with the general election campaign of a

candidate for Federal office." 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d). This

language is susceptible of interpretation as placing a limit

on party coordinated expenditures in connection with Federal

races or in connection with Federal candidates. The Com-

mission's regulations do not assist in this matter. 11 C.F.R.

§110. 7.

Therefore, the Office of General Counsel recommends

that the Commission take no further action in connection with

the National Republican Senatorial Committee's possible

violation of 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) since the statute is not

explicit on whether the expenditure limitations apply to

Federal candidates or to Federal Senate seats. The Commission

will want to consider this matter fully in drafting a new

Regulation prior to the 1980 elections. However, the Com-

mission's decision to take no further action in this matter

should not be read as an adoption of NRSC's interpretation of

the statute.

However, it is clear that coordinated party expenditures

under § 441a(d) are limited to expenditures "in connection

with the general election." The primary election in Alabama

was held on September 5, 1978, with a Runoff on September 26,

1978. The Comrmission's (E) Index shows NRSC expending $3,000

-6-

in coordinated expenditures on July 19, 1978 and $25,000 in

coordinated expenditures on September 1, 1978. NRSC's own

journal entries show the July 19, 1978 amount of $3,000

charged to the National Party limit and the September 1, 1978

amount of $25,000 charged to the State Party limit. If these

expenditures were in connection with the Alabama primary or

runoff election rather than in connection with the general

election, they would not be allowable under 2 U.S.C. S44la(d).

In addition, since the only dated letters of authorization to

NRSC were a letter from the Republican National Committee dated

September 5, 1978 and one from the Alabama Republican Execu-

tive Committee dated August 22, 1978, the July 19, 1978 expendi-

ture would seem outside the scope of § 441a(d) as NRSC was not

the "designated agent" of the RNC at the time of the ex-

penditure.

Therefore, the Office of the General Counsel recommends that

the Commission find reason to believe that NRSC may have

violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by reporting expenditures made in con-

nection with the Alabama Senatorial primary, and made prior

to the time NRSC was the designated agent of RNC, as coordinated

expenditures under 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d), 11 C.F.R. S 110.7(a) (4).

NRSC also reports one coordinated expenditure of $50,000

made on October 2, 1978, the day that James Martin switched

his candidacy from the Sparkman seat to the Allen seat. NRSC's

0 -7-

journal entries allocate $28,458.63 of this amount to the Allen

Senate seat campaign and the balance to the Sparkman Senate seat

campaign. The Office of General Counsel recommends that the Com-

mission seek further details from NRSC concerning this expenditure,

e.g., the purpose of the expenditure, the method of determining

the allocation of the expenditure to Sl and S2. Therefore, the

office of General Counsel recommends that the Commission approve

and send the attached letter and interrogatories.

Finally, NRSC reports contributions pursuant to 2 U.S.C.

S 441a(h) to both the Sl and S2 Martin campaigns. The Commission's

(G) Index shows a transfer of $600,000 from the Republican National

Committee to the NRSC on August 3, 1977. NRSC ledger sheets allocate

S 441a(h) contributions in the amount of $16,493.27 to candidate

Martin in his race for the Sparkman Senate seat (el) and $17,300.00

V) as S 441a(h) contributions to candidate Martin in his race for the

AMW Allen Senate seat (S2). A question has been raised as to the accuracy

C11 of interpreting 2 U.S.C. S 441a(h) to limiting Senatorial Campaign

Committee contributions to candidates for specific Senate seats.

Does S 441a(h) permit a $17,500 contribution by NRSC to candidate

N Martin in his Sl campaign and another $17,500 contribution by NRSC

to candidate Martin in his S2 campaign?

The provision reads:

(h) Notwithstanding any other provision ofthis Act, amounts totaling not more than $17,500may be contributed to a candidate for nominationfor election, or for election, to the United StatesSenate during the year in which an election is heldin which he is such a candidate, by the

0 ~-8-

Republican or Democratic Senatorial CampaignCommittee, or the national committee of apolitical party, or any combination of suchcommittees.

2 U.S.C. S 44la(h). The important limiting phrase here is

"to a candidate for ... election, to the United States Senate

during the year in which an election is held in which he is

such a candidate." The limiting phrase in S 441a(d) (3) reads

"in connection with the general election campaign of a candidate."

Thus, the question becomes whether the language of S 441a(h) or

its legislative history can be construed more clearly than that

of S 441a(d) (3) to apply either to contributions to individual

candidates for the Senate or to contributions to specific

senate races. The legislative history is helpful in this regard.

Section 441a(h) began as an amendment offered by Senator

Johnston during the senate floor debate of FECA's 1976

amendments. 122 Cong. Rec. S 3,805 (daily ed. March 18, 1976)

(Remarks of Senator Johnston). The provision as originally

introduced amended what became the $5,000 contribution

limitation of S 441a(2) (A) to add the following:

After "exceed $5,000." add "except that theRepublican or Democratic Senatorial CampaignCommittee, the Democratic National CongressionalCommittee, the National Republican CongressionalCommittee, or the national committee of apolitical party may contribute at any timeamounts not exceeding $20,000 to candidates forCongress with respect to any or all of theelections in which such candi-dates seek officeduring an election year."

-9-

Id. (Emphasis added). Senator Johnston explained his

amendment:

What it does is simply this: it increasesto $20,000 per year for elections that thecommittee may give to any candidate. Under thepresent law the committee, the Senatorial,Democratic or Republican, Committee may give$5,000 per election, election including theprimary, runoff, and general electian, or$15,000 for candidates who have all threeelections.

What this amendment does is simply saythat that amount is increased to $20,000 isnot made dependent upon whether they areprimaries, runoffs, or general elections.

Id. (Emphasis added). After some discussion, Senator Johnston

amended his amendment to read:

At the appropriate place in the bill insertthe following: "Notwithstanding any other provisionof this Act the Republican or Democratic SenatorialCampaign Committee, the Democratic National Congres-sional Committee, the National Republican Congres-sional Committee, or the national committee of apolitical party may contribute at any time amountsnot exceeding $20,000 to candidates for Congresswith respect to any or all of the elections inwhich such candidates seek office during an elec-t-ion year."

Id. at S 3,806 (Emphasis added). The Senate voted 64-20 to

accept Senator Johnston's amendment as set out above. Id.

at S 3,808.

The Senate next discussed the Johnston amendment on

March 24, 1976 in the context of an amendment in the nature

of a substitute to S.3065 introduced by Senator Cannon.

Senator Cannon made the following statement in connection

with the substitute's effect on the Johnston amendment:

Second, the amendment to S.3065 proposed bySenator Johnston and previously adopted by theSenate is modified to clarify that contributionsby the specified party__committees d1o not aggre-gate more than $20,000 in an election year.

122 Cong. Rec. S 4,150 (daily ed. March 24, 1976) (Remarks of

Senator Cannon) (Emphasis added). Final action on the amendment

in the Senate limited its effect to the Senate, Id. at S 4,158

(Remarks of Mr. Johnston) and decreased the limitation from

$20,000 to $17,500, Id. at S 6,365. The only discussion by

the House is contained at H 3,783 (Remarks of Rep. Peyser).

Finally, discussion in the House-Senate Conference on S.3065

also indicates that this provision was intended to limit

contributions by Senatorial campaign committees to candidates

"per calendar year". House-Senate Conferees, Conference

Report to accompany S.3065, Federal Election Campaign Act

Amendments of 1976 at 375-77 (April 7, 1976). Complete copies

of the above-referenced legislative history are attached.

Thus, it appears that there is sufficient legislative

history to support an interpretation of 2 U.S.C. S 441a(h)

which would limit NRSC in its contributions to a candidate to

$17,500 per calendar year regardless of the number of elections

in which the candidate ran and regardless of the number of

Senate seats for which the individual was a candidate.

Although Congressional debate did not specifically anticipate

that one individual would be a candidate in more than one

Senate race in one year, it is clear that the limitation was

-11-

meant to apply per year not per election. Thus, the rationale

of the Fraser AO which required that contributions transferred

from S1 to S2 be allocated to the original contributors for

contribution limitation purposes would be inapposite here

where the limitation applies per year and not per election.

AO 1978-19. This analysis is consistent with AO 1978-64

which advised NRSC that the $17,500 limitation of 2 U.s.c.

S 441a(h) "relate to a particular candidate for the Senate

rather than a particular Senate seat."


that the Commission find reason to believe that the National

Republican Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C.

§ 441a(a) (h) by making contributions to James Martin during

calendar year 1978 in excess of the limitations of that

provision of the Act.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Take no further action in connection with the National

Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) 's possible violation of

2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) in connection with the Senatorial campaign

of James Martin of Alabama.

2. Find reason to believe that the National Republican

Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by re-

porting expenditures made in connection with the Alabama

Senatorial primary, and made prior to the time NRSC was the

designated agent of RNC, as coordinated expenditures under

2 U.S.C. § 441a(d) , 11 C.F.R. S 110.7(a) (4).

-12-


Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.s.c. S 441a(h) by

making contributions to James Martin of Alabama during



4. Approve and send the attached letter and interrogatories.

WILICTOLAGENERAL COUNSEL7

Attachments

1. NRSC Response2. Letter to Respondent and Interrogatories3. Legislative History

MEFPLE R. .JENK' M

DE~IIH. N'esr~0mPICHAEt_ A. STEIlLACC.I

CARL F. SCHIF.RJOt.irPH E. JAN'kTTA

JA~mcis F% SCHQ- .J (~t NJ, H4ITCHCOCK

Pf~SN AR"I TT

GARY J2. MYS_-!0-M

RO.NALD A. DENVETH

TtI0Z HY J. MULLINS

LAW OFFICES

JENKINS. -NASTI(O. & S.LflLACC[, P.r.2013 IM STREET. N.W.

WASHINGTON. 0 C. 20026

(202o 293.2505

January 10, 19-79

OF COUNSEL

JOHN 13 CONLAN

EMWAT1LJ A.RYE

MICHIGAN CFFIC--

159930NEST, TWIELVE MiLL RQAD

SOUTHFIELD, IICMiGAN 49C)7d(313) 559-2a2a

Kathlleenl Thai, Perkins, Esq.OffiHce of Geicaral CounselFederal Election Commission1325 K Street', N.W.

1.ahingo, D.C. 20 46 3'.d .. ~

Re: M UR 820

Dear 'Ms. Perkl-ins:

Enclosad you will find the affidavit of 'Mr. Rodney A. Sm-ith, treasurerof -lhe National Republican Senatorial Committee concerning expenditures andcontributices to the t-vo 'Martin for Senate Committees. As is apparent frorthe last. part of the affidavit, 'Mr. Martin resigned from his' candidacy forthe Senate seat of retiring Senator John Spark'man (Class 2, United Sta-tesS_-natea) i~n Oct-ober 1973, and was theLreafter nominated to run for the seatle' tvicant by the untimsely death of Senator James Allen of Alabama (Class 3Uaiited States Senate). A similar situation 'had previously occurred i~nM innesota an-d Advisory Opinion 197C-1? to Con-ressman Fraser w-asstdc lfollowa ,ed to azive direction for such a change. in candidacy.

Tha- aff-davit should show our co-mpliance with the requirements of thatAdvisory Opi1nion arid I attach herato copies of assignment and allocationaigreemencLS of the National and State Party co~ittees authorizing our actingas their ag-:ent in each of these campaign cc=ittees.

I will be glad to furnish any further information or documentationneeded to indicate our compliance in this matter, and ask that before anyfurther action. is taken that we be given an opportunity for a confercnce or

as;rfurther questions in writing.

Respectfully, /11

*' Jame s F. Schoener

Ene- 1osires

P.S T alz)arenclose, a copy ,-) th-e r'evior. b%, Stan Hukbthe C.P.A. w.hu-C I C ,-%d t he ie-ms L11in i the RcavSmith a S fidav.t.

.

* ~epblican

~\!aziojnal

C o n mitt'Lee

September 5, 19073

rnb KooraleBob Packwood, ChairmanNotional BuicnSenatoria 1 Co, ritte227 Massachusetts Avenue, NE

~;asingonD. C. 20002

Daar Bob:

5% this lett%-er the Recublican National Com-mittee authorizesa h National Repub lic an Senatorial Comittee to serve as the

agentL- o-f7 the R~epublican National Committ-J-'--ee, for the our-ose,o: akig xenditures pursuannt to 2 Usc S441a (d) (3). Your

Commi-4e is alutkhorized to make these expendi tures, on behal.;Of th.e Rc1--ublican National Commruittee, in connec'tion .wit,'h the

c~noalelection campaign o-f- James Marti n o-f 'laama

S '21-a (d) (3) you11',..cm-- tt' s behalf, up

may spend, on the Repu!D).ic--n Nationalto $10,000 for Mr. M-art'-n.

Der3onal ragards.

Verytrl yours,

BILL BAROCK

Cc: Bob ooeM en Co ttcn

Jay av r. rincj

I

IN'

'Slrc-t r

Ccmi ni.'

U~1 a C->z

T~- IionraleBob Packw-,:ood, C'hair.--anNatjonal Republican Senatocrial Committee2227 LNasz-acau i'.s,2L-ts Avenue, NEliashington, D. C. 20002'

I~ 4 s 4lot eto tn-he R-eDubic--an Nati4onal Committ-; em auth-orizesthe Naticona Repub)I;can Senatorial Cocmmittn. ee to serve as the

can o: he- Republican National Comnmittee, fcr the purpDoseoL majc7 e:x:endi-tures purs-uant to 2 Usc S44'laGd) (2.). YourCc: ~i a I s a uthocri_4z cd t o m-,ak'.e thes e e..::p n d_- urczes , on b e *.a 1f

1.: ta taulcr catno-1 C cnimm. in connection wit thee~nrl e-C-tion caumpa.c-n o f S en ate Seat .1, Alabama

_11 2.5 i. aiton t o ourZ letter of S e t.- C, -7 Q in t-he

n.,c sn,(d (2) y u m y s cn , on t e.7 P eu ) 1; n N71 c-n aC:~~~-~~o behalf an ad nl?2,_ o r

totalina to -?U Or

01 s c±t z;e r z a rcgards. -

Very rl your-,

D~ 11,L C .

cc: Bc-cD 4MooreBGnC:D ttn

C'-) C ar a c~P '

* jaz'< 'vZ..=MJy ~ann

r'~~ ~ ~~ r:~~o'~~YDCnCa:32 -' ~ ~!

Repub,)IcCanNational

C ormitt eeBill BrcckCI r rna n

T>~ Mcorc2l1 Bob Pack-wood, ChairmanC'tinalI c aub-ica Se na t or ial1 Ccmmnitt4Cee227 asscnu2ttsAvenue, NE

WasingonD. C. 20002

By hjsleterthe Re:Dublican National Committee authorizesthe a~lnalRepub lican Senatorial Cormmittee to serve as the

ac>, 'CL of": the Republican National Comrmittee, for the purposeoT nc'.kin -exceditures pursuant to 2 USC S 4la (d) (3). Your

C c~r.-..ite i s a u thor iz ed t o m ak.-e these elxpenditures, on behalfO_ e~ea election cazinof Senate Seat # 2.

Unce S44la 1, d) (3) you may spend, ,on the Reoublican NationalCcmn~t~e' bhafUp to $60,000 -for- Mr. Jam~es M-artin, of

C71Very LI'uly your-

cBILL BRoc: -1

I rie Blac kJ C 7- U i e yStr o m

-Jay ~a nrng

D~..'i~ht . )eflc,,er, Rccubfi:n Center: 310 Fir-s.zsr-'et Sc hit. W 'j n 0

Comm i -,.ee

* NtioalRe-ublican Senatori~ Ccr-ee22 7 Ma s ach use tts T\Venua, NIE.WashingtoZlni D. C. 20002

*De ar B o:

B%, th'is let-ter the Re;:ubljcan N-ational Ccrm-nittee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Ccmfittee to serve as thea c n o f th R a-pu b I c an Nat-ional Commttee, for the purocse*c_ a:n x~niue pursuantI. to 2 USC S441a(d) (3). Yourc,0-m.m:zzee is authorized to ma"ke these exnendi:.turo._s, on behalf"0- -h~ ~~blc NtolC'te in con-nectE-on w itI:h Z- h

--2erea Ioe c~mrai-n of Senate Seat L"2.ai d Is in a6_d i tion to our lee 47- he anoun - of $6 0,00 0.

--- 21 t'(rS4l~d) C3) you may snenld, on the Re-publican 'Nation-ahi:.itat behalf a n aaa3dion a 1 C-,0O0 0 r ir

the Cu=u4tie tot4-al toC $61,000.

> .S-t person1rzrs

Very truly Yours,

Cc::

-Bn Coctt zn

JaDann~nc* Ker~'Klir :e

w'.ich: - -. Zr ~ -.- ,,L-4.,..

lepubliDca 1-

4aionalC1oMrni

.00-

P.O0. E0.3~

AGF _EMEN,.T tBET;TEEINTME INAT-ON. ICEtflBLICAN SCENTOR.nLIL~T~~

A ND THE~ ?A_.k3MA FEPtJDLC.7>21 E,,:%CUT-A!E CYTZ

T'he National Repul-ican Sena-torial Critehere inafter known as "Sena-toriall", acar. e~~t th .lc~-n ~ublianExecuti ve Ccj4ite, hereinfe knv..jn as "Statr2"; asfol.s

1. UnL~er tetziinof 441 a(d) (3) Of Title 2 of the United States Codle, State(and its suzorainate ccr_,it,*t -es) may make certain exedtrsin con-nection

w th t-eaene_=ral elec tion capign. of th e ca_-ndid a te for the offi ce Uni,4tedS--tts Senantor for the State of ;alabama.

2. uch- na.t of allowed exoaend~turs under said e)rovis ion has bencnued

t 2n tat 1v,_ly '"y the Federal ElectiLon Co~dssion as the amount of $62,507.00.

3.~~ Tha Stt wczhe to es e S e n ri--al its a ce n for th!- purpose ofak.s uc to the amount of $60,000.00.

C, St.7t 4cro: to'C f.-e an aloainst ccn c ern in th e amoun-t r.otl a-,, z c:to~~~~~~~ -2a rn rauc 1v ch teea leto n Con~s ion 77tin 11S S2)

5. '-- c~e o ca=-r cut the :- of such:. alloca-tion Ctteen a W .1aP&n SertoiI at any tine the;i': St~ate aditsboint r-.ts

* r-amc. c0-_ of- t -- amount ret ained by Stat-e anrd a reviet,: of thi aremet ilo c z:-r a: such time.

6. Seaoilacrees to make such exoenditures in behalf of candidlate, or if it is&~ m~:rucabe oMake such eeniusto prc~vreleaze and ca-.cel

sac acn,:' and reassi"gn such allocated amonIL: to St_-aze.

Thi aeo~~tsicned the date opposite th!-ewhen s:ned _1y bt a:s

197D. C.

respective oartjes naeto be e v

National ~ ~ ~ -R uicnSntor a. Cc.T.t

Title____________

T i± ; n .r-;y a-

Al ~ ____ ah I): ., v om tt2

)II/Z S___

Titl c>

*(-(-2

.epubiflNational

C).-n He rirj7. c!1 c.,irmir'MhfZ>( rnc -rr A:a b i rn aP.C. D ox 225SirZniiv, 'a~T~ La~-. S

(ON,7s)" -5 T-3

*_-O

AUND T= ALXB371%LA REPU=-LIC.%N E: C-=;.VE'c~

Th c :atin- Re .c: an S a=-,atorial Cc-;, o~ lae rein at kn own a s "e nat 0ri a2.,ar

wit i,,, ~I a pe"wilican Executive contehereinafter k no'wn as "Sae;as foll1ows:

1.i~~artP?~rv o c ~Ia(-:) (2) of- Title, 2 of t-heUitsSteCoStt

(and ~ ~ =%n isstcdntecrtte e ) irzv Make certain CO:,z' trsiconection.

h,2h scecial general election camoiaign of the canmi-'azoe for the office UicI

eS7,t-s Sno - fcr the State of Alabarma. unexpired ter:-. Place '12.

2. -Dc .2un of rloe e~ s =dner sai.d', provisiron has been com7 ut-d

t -noa2rvel by the "FAeraj zlection Comrarissi on as the a=*=~n of r62.. 7.0I

3.T-a ta-e w2i s h es to csnteSenatorial its acent for heuro of nk:c

sum :ueditresucto --he a a-t'f$6,000

State-- lO2 t e an '2O tt-vn onenn the- amocunt notas 1V:

LA to Scu~ as r:urdby the F eo eal zElection Cmra0 eu.tOl1..7('

D toc~ . ~iin rsc ~.Z sta-teme;nt a-pd

83C- or: the autretained by Saeand a revr'ew of zhis ag a: rect will

oCccur St ut tam e.

a C -fa~t2 ace ec, to Cake s uch e x:-e n d itc i n hbeh alf - o - c an d ida t e, o r i f -it si

an mnnez-r Iunab-Ile to maesuch exoen it-u r es, to promptlyv re lease and ca-nce I.

n..,c and rem ctsc a a a amount to State.

Thmaa-c-;fCi sicnord the date OoD0Sost h

Lu'datis

.C.

rcsrmectave parties' nam:,e toc be e~

I a t ionl Re p1-ID1z a n Senatrial Coma c t

- -

TitlC A-- 1-_ (2

7-

i~j~3if z ana L SV~

Octobe-r 17, 197 8

NacoralRenublican Senatorial Comilttee

227 Ma'fSSach2usetts Avenue, NE-shinton, DC 20002

- . Doa:r Rod,

?ursz.ant to our conversation of last week, I am- sulzlitting the

fo1-nfiures to the %National Republi can Senatorial1 C o --- 1, e e con-

cernioyou-r limitations on hoJi;m M. ti For. SeaeICmLtc

Vs you kow, Mr. Martin has chang-ed cand idacy for electLn o hsta-s e-at) n, heefre ud t he lais en~r'- a new

af lo-CtC 1. Ina accorckance with Advisory Opiniion 1978-19, we have made

a1:: n L)- o f h! " co or-dinat e - exan-r.d Itu ro-s " T:adb th e 'Na tion al

R~u~iSe .na ccrial Co~itte between the f irst seanate -race an ::he

s~cuSona ra2c2. Of the $100G, 00 0.0C0 in c coardi:natet d ex-oad tLr -ms th a

you havo Mnade, $70,170.55 has b ee n al lo c ated t o th e f ir st s enatnte camv a fc

ad$23 ,453.63 has been allocate-d to the second campaign. Thereann

b 10-G n E C_ e-O 1370.82 is Presently, being refun~ded to you by the vemoocr.Usinc- A.C. 19'71-190 al fyu onrb os($17,500.00 max4__:mu) made

CIoShefis senate campaign are ncr.-allocable to the second cam-paign.

Tho 3ore cat 1 it will begin again. I understand that you have made

s -:b-s ecqnC contributi."ons to the second senate campaign, and those amounts

should~ 3e ad. to th 2,5.3 in dcter-ining the total amount re

c or coordinated e_-menditures in the second serate camnaign. A

detailed explIanation f[or this allocation has been telecopied to you

by co- Jami Xartin for Senzate Can'oaign Ccmittee.

A allocaotions hamve been made based on the ectamounts ofE in-voace'2S I! o;cn- to Us by veridors. Should any of these amounts have a sih

'.7~t~f, e r'l aoicl otifC-y you as to the effects thpey have

Ple-ase fooal Afree to contact 'me if you have any further questiofls

cono~n.n~th"L; matter.

- C_ A y-- /

S'_' Stann -,-uc!;.byL

U'NTE":-D STATES OF AMR TCAi'

Bef,;ore tilhe FEDERAL EL'ECT1O1L4 C0L-11411SSION

i~ ti-,t tr o fNA?:c;: L?.ZU~LIANSEN.4ATORIAL COMMI,1TTZE M.tJ.R. 820

AFFI1DAVI TT

CitL." o-f 1-1 sina, 4-01

District ofColumbia

Rodny A Smthbeing duly sworn deposes and says:

T,;"-he is the duly, appointcad treasurer of thlle Natiocna _

ReuzL~~nSena.tor j-al Contmitt-oe of -227 Massach-u3etts Avenuef N.E.,I

\.a~necnD.C.

i>cas such tr1sre e supervised andl dirLcted the m--a-,Iing ol

cor". t-,- ons as allowed by law to Republican candiJdates for theofi

oL Unitedm," Sta--tes Senate in the year 1978.

Thatin s u -rL c a pcn-t,, - c a t ions, of c a sh (o in-fkind) wr aet

.1ei -or Senata-- (Sakansa)from July 11 throuc-h A1ugust"1th

119.772 in. amount of $1I,493.27 as is s'hown1r In our internanl recoL-Lus,

a1 cOs:-Y Ofwhc is a-ttached as Ex"hibit A.

Thiat in such cap~acity donationz of cash in the amount of $17,00;)

7M ', madao James Martin. for Senate ("'llen seat) on Octobher 6th n

Lan i n-k cntributo ofuse of. video ecL, ment of $300.00maeo'L:t

Cco n26-rath as is shc...n by our irtra c-crs, a copoy of xhich is

aLta: as Exhib t B.

V

Th.at hle is informed and believes that such cash expenditures are

un,,_'r the Provisions of 2 U.S.C. -Sec-tion 441a(h).

VI

i,).aC in such caoacity he sunervised and directed the expenditure

0: :nds in behalf of James mrtin forSntcSakinsa),a

ajcorjodby 2 U. S.C. 42.1a (d) and as, assigned to the Nationlal

I ubican Sena tor ial CoT-Lmit-_tee by Republ1 ican Nat ion a] Ccmii t-.--e.

n :1 i t rs i n bc.l e o-i,-If- J an,.oes ',,ar t in f or S en 0te ( qp ar.- an s

s'ou .nte tchd hiitC.

T-:t in such ca--acitv,, hie supervjsed -anrd directed the exoedtu:

o.fud in behalf of Ja-mes %Ia!rtin for Senate (Allen seat-) as uthor zcQ

2 U.SD. C. 4 41a (d) and as assigned to thle National Republican Se*:-!at'-r'La-

C cm~t' b the Pp ublcan NationalI Cornittee. Si d ec.:e n _ tu-r3S 4 ,

baILE of Ja7mces,~Iri for, Sena-te (Allen seat) are shown in thre tcW.

~.btD. As sho7 1 in saidl E:,:hibibs C and D, a credit for funds- o7

mc~~~n 7c-ial 4rf~radf James "~r~nFor Sonat-e (Sparkma,_-n scat ) t

Jamea Matnfr Sen"ate (Ailon Seat) in the aFmout of $28r,1450-63

on Octo!-)e- 2,19/2

VIIT

'hit: is informed and. belie thtsuclh ag.ency agrec-mnlts

are pro:Cc: and correct -and tC1hat the same wecre in accordance w.ith

jzmsion Regulations #110.7 and Advisory Op~inion 1976-108.

Vr--ar he supervised and dircct-ed the expendit-ures for- James Mri

ifrSenate-a (Sparkman sea-t) and James martin foEr Sez-nate- (Allen seat)

as were assigned by allocation agreeiients frocm the Alabam-a (StCate)

11ulia Excut-iVe COMMi ttee, suich e r-er.d i t ur es be inga s h own on t hre

a~or~Id T::hibIt s C anda D.

re) x

Tht eis informed and- belev -hat all such,- transzc ioP.

-7-1§ "Con t-bu2 t toC Two C amealo gns by One Cn I date' mnade in

ccn ection whteFrser for Sen-ate Campaigns, and that the

arin C-amoajans are indistinguishable in- all material as--c-cfrom

s.-.id Fra-.ser situation.

Tht n order tLo make.- su-re that all proper ceiswere rtxaude

f(-r ca,:!2 co- cre-if.ts tra--nSolecrred,- Ifrem the Ma rtin ThiLt:(Sa:Vcn

seat to thL MtnComittce(ln seAt) , the ia~oa ui~t

Sentoia Cmmt eere cuiredl a certified public aconatto ak

o- t review~ of credits of c-sh and in-kind contribution-s

ca:SierCQfrom the first comittee to the second.

Furt,-hr deponent saith no"L.

Rodney ISfiithTreasur -- (i, National Republ sca-cS ena t~ 0 - l-1 Co0aid t te e

ri -c r sulbscribed be-Fore me a notary public in an o h

L3.~t.1' Coumb ia -t h is

Cz±

M~'ccF~flliIsJon sX 25

rl L a In u 19 )

I* IJ IL.I 1 111.

IL Ii

1111111~~4 ; 111IIllt1111

ii7Hi1l :_________j;

2'7__

.I ........ .

4~-r%. __~~~~~j~~ell~V~7i . -

_______I / -L Ii t4{

i ic1 11 it~,L~ Ii 1 i I I I 6j T 1

___~~~wl _____ _ Ilf. __ _

________~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~J -__________ ___ __ ____________ !IILL

______ _____________ ____ __ _______ _______

_____i_

______ ______________ ____ ___ I ~i.ii!1 _ 0

___ IiIII! I I~'I~~1 ___ __12

___ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 -7t -1 0~1 _____

________ J1l I I I ' I____

I -

__________________________~ [LI I i__________ ____ ____ ___ ___ _ _;21~

j_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ FI 22II I I ****~~*i Iii I I) ~~~~~It ' I' iI1I ~ I ~'

___ ____________ ____1II23

_ _ IiII 1 111 -..-.-.Ii!1I24

~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 IIi~., ' ________

__________ _________________________________________ _____________ __________________ IitII_______________1

2S

II ;,2S i ~ II____

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ I_ _ _ _ f t ' _ _ _ _

__ 11 f~l~t~lf I 'flit'30_

______ ________________________ I I I I ___________ ________________________ _______31

___________________ 'I I I_________ _________ _______

_________________________________________ _____________ _________________ I ___________________1 I:33

* -- Iiit

~~~~1 .. II

I:

I. _________________________________________________________________

I-

IiI,

ii

_____________ I _______________ ~1I I~

_________

* ~*

* *, I

e.0,~ r D"

2 9 iL 4~ 1~~§, ,;' ~ LL-'H' lii IJ14

Ij \ i' .

6 #1 Iz A)~~'I I li tII

*~~~hJ1~ P i f _

1m I., ~'. ______ i Ii ______ f______ ____

2444

______ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ....... .lh l fl~ llIi iIll Ih iI t.j....

3.4

35

I *

Ii

I.

319 i .. 7 _ _ __ _

.2 6~~

-~ ~ C3i ?-s~ 4 5 A

If~CT-r~ NL (L/ _,/0EC

HI I

-1 / L- 1;r

I L~..~~:j L ~ ,iL~..\~IG~2'~t~'I ii Lu1Oj)f o" icKyI II

"-,t I U. II. t

1-

L)

4 II$ ~II9

II

IItiff

~3 .1171~i-7

iLA.. T> . ,2'--

II~~ ~ 6 ', K

I K< 15kJCiC.

I-,--- -~

KIji~11111III

IIIi

in7-Al

IIi~1~ii

4 -~

IvIi j hK;iI ~ ~,J~iJ ~ L1 'r 4..ei1/ j

I2L1Z~iII I

IIIf

II I

IIII

II

rtv~jI

I!

I I ________

__ I I i ]'1Ali iI 1 I IrIIH7 'l

'132

23 I _____I __ l~il

2II __ _ _ _ _ Cl _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

~~2 Il~~~~~ II ~~ fli IiF ~ I_ __ _ _ _ _

~3~ I...~ ffII1fli~ff~ _____ ____ T

__ fiflIiIIiIflI'f' _

ti' 1 1 , I ,~i j I I

__________ I, I t~i,*t ____

________________ U'I I''f'I '

*1 ___________

ii 1111' ____________________

__________ __________ ii ______ _______ ___ ___ _

________________ _______________________________________ __________ ____________ 1 ______ ____ _

ILi~1 ~') ".~tL2~z~21L-~ 2~-r---~

Lr~~ ~ '~ ,- - I

.~J~LL&lLL~L2J2/~II ~I I I I

_________________________________________________________ it________________________ ii

IiJat~ 4 7.- II

II II 'I

~ILJ,!J c~ .A( /

iii-"' ~-~~11 I IIII II ~ I I I

j~<~46L5cb/II 1 II' II

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SIR[IT N.W.wASHIN(;ION,DC 20463


Mr. James F. SchoenerJenkins, Nystrom & Sterlacci, P.C.2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

The Commission is continuing its investigation inthe above-referenced matter. In this regard, theCommission, on June , 1979, found reason to believethat the National Republican Senatorial Committee

1: may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 434by reporting expenditures made inconnection with the Alabama Senatorialprimary, and one said expenditure madeprior to the time NRSC was the desig-nated agent of RNC, as coordinatedexpenditures under 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d),11 C. F. R. S 110. 7(a) (4) ;

2: may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(h)by making contributions to James Martinof Alabama during calendar year 1978 inexcess of the limitations of thatprovision of the Act.

Attached is a set of interrogatories, answers towhich will assist the Commission in resolving thismatter. The interrogatories relate to the fact thatNRSC has reported two expenditures, one of $3,000 onJuly 19, 1978, and one of $25,000 on September 1, 1978,as § 441a(d) coordinated expenditures. The Alabamaprimary was held on September 5, 1978 and the date ofthe first letter of authorization from the RNC was

Mr. James F. SchoenerPage Two

September 5, 1978. In addition, the Commission is seekingfurther facts relating to the $50,000 expenditure madeon October 2, 1978, part of which was allocated to theSparkman Senate seat campaign and part to the AllenSenate seat campaign.

Under the Act, you have an opportunity to demonstratethat no action should be taken against you. Please submitany factual or legal materials which you feel are relevantto the Commission's analysis of these maters. Additionally,please answer the attached Interrogatories and return themto the Commission within ten (10) days of your receipt ofthis letter. The attorney assigned to this matter isKathleen Imig Perkins, (202)523-4175. Please contactMs. Perkins if you have any questions concerning MUR 820.

Sincerely,


Enclosures

INTERROGATORIES -SCHOENER -MUR 820

1. State the purpose of NRSC's expenditure of $3,000 on

July 19, 1978, reported as a §441a(d) coordinated

expenditure in connection with the Alabama general

election campaign of James Martin for U.S. Senate.

2. How was this expenditure related to the general election

when the Alabama primary was not held until September 5,

1978 and the runoff was not held until September 26, 1978?

Was NRSC the designated agent of RNC (for the purpose of

§441a(d) expenditures) as of July 19, 1978?


September 1, 1978, reported as a §441a(d) coordinated

expenditure in connection with the Alabama general election

campaign of James Martin for U.S. Senate.

4. Relate this expenditure to the general election.

5. State the purpose of the expenditure made by NRSC on

October 2, 1978 in the amount of $50,000.

*6. What method was utilized to allocate part of this expenditure

to the Martin Sl campaign and part to the S2 campaign.

7. Were any media materials, developed using Sl NRSC coordinated

expenditures, utilized in the S2 campaign? If so, was an

amount allocated to S2 for purchase of said materials?

8. Please submit any materials or documentation in support of

your answers to the above questions.

.JmK ~

I.'.dL ~ *~- ~-~-- ~ .~-. -~ '... - ~A.

0 0Mai~tjch 18, 1976 co

Several Senators addressed the Chair.MNr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, I send

an 11melfllflwlt to the desk.Tho VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk

wIll report.Ille i~ssistittit legislative clerk pro-

ceffled to reitd the amendment.Mr. GRIFIN. Mr. President, I ask

unanimous consent that further reading,,f thle a&iendmnerit be dispensed with.

The VICE PRESIDENT. Wilthout ob-j cc t ion, It is so ordered.

(Pursuant to an order entered laterin today's proceedings, Mr. GRIFFIN'S5econd amendment in the nature of arubstitute is not printed in the RECORD.)

Mr. GRIF"FIN. I would like to explainthlis amnadment.

Mfr. CANNON. Does the Senator havea ,'opy, Mr. President?

mr. GRIFFIN. We will get someXt'roxed copies made for the chairmanaind others.

I u.Ill tell the Senate this is anothersux;tltute, and in this case the Packwoodiinwitdent, which is a very meritoriousnm(endment, one of the most importantanitendments that we have ever adoptednround here, but realizing that it is con-t-,oversial and we lose votes because It IsIn the substitute, has been elim~inated.h3ut the Chiles amendment has been in-ciludeitd.

'I'its substitute includes the Chilesamendment, and it also carries thetunendment of the Senator from Arizonawith regard to honoraria, and we wouldJiist like to call the roll again.

Nr. TAFT. Mr. President, will the Sen-ator yield?

Mlr. GRIFFIN. I yield.M.Nr. TAFT. I wxonder If It also contains

the allendment of the Senator fromOio?

N1r. GRlIFFIN. I will have to admit itUoeVs nlot at this Point, Of course, it is

-t~cnable.,Mr. P~esident, I suggest the absence

of it quorum.,%r. CANNON. Mr. President, I would

:''.e to see a COPY of the amendment.M.r. GRIFFIN. I suggest the absence of

aquorum.TheC VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk will

call the roll.Th1eassistant legislative clerk proceed-

ed to call the roll.Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I ask

unanimrolus consent that the order for thequorum~ call be rescinded.

The VICE PRESIDENT. Without ob-hlctlon. it Is so ordered.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I havean4 "Irnledment which I send to the desk.

The1- VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk willStaIte the amendment.

The assistant legislative clerk proceed-ed to readi the aznendment.

.Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I askunianimous consent that further readingIf 'Ile amendment be dispensed with.

Mr. CLARK, I object.ThO VICE PRESIDENT. Objection isheard.~ The clerk will read the amend-

raco nt.0The a&ssistant legislative clerk read asfollo,,':A~rnendnment to Line 23 of Page 27 of S3065,

Panding Section 320(a) (2) *of the bill, as1lows:

NGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE S3S05

4 57

Altxer "exceed $5,000." add "except that hRepubhlcan or Democratic Senatorial Cam1-pal g Comumittee, the Democratic NationalCoza(4res.isional Committee, the National Re-puiblicanl Congressional Committee, or theaiatioal committoee of a political party maycontribute at any time amiounts not exceed-ig $2i0000 to candidates for Congress wit11

re.-%vct to nny or all of the elections inWilq~i

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, thisamendment is submitted on behalf ofmyself, Senator B3ENTSEN, who is a formerchairman of our Democratic SenatorialCamnpaikl Committee, as well as SenatorSTE~VENS, the chairman of the Republi-can Senatorial Campaign Committee.

What it does is simply this: It Jmj-creases to $20,000 per year for..eec ionthafit- t-hecommiitte -may- iv 'to.,anysa~dld.Ute. Under the present law the com-mittee: the Senatorial, Democratic or Re-publican, Committee may give $5,000 jE!electioll, election Including the primary,runoff, and general election, or $15,000for candidates who have all three elec-tions.

What this aniencinent doesj:.simnpjysayththtion is increased to$20,-00ribt-rhiThV~depi)end1ent-upon z whethey

theyr'a're'-pr'fhmaries,_ijnlofs,..rgeea

Mr'Ptesident, the whole thrust, thewhole reason, for this campaign law isto do away, Insofar as we can, with whatyou might call committed money-somecall it dirty money, money with strings,money where there is some quid pro quo,express or implied, for the contribution.

So, Mr. President, this amendment in-creases the amount which you can getfrom the one source, that is. your Sena-torial Campaign Comimittees or your na-tional committees, for which there is noquid pro quo.

As a matter of fact, I daresay the av-erage Senator in this body does not evenknow where the contributions come tofor the Senatorial Campaign Commit-tees. In the case of the Democratic Com-mittee we do not pass around the list.Some Senators do not even secure con-tributions, but they all get contributionson a parity basis.

It seems to me, Mr. President, we oughtto make it as easy as possible withinreason to allow these contributions to,be made in reasonable amounts whenwe know they are not going to be basedon any semblance of any promise, ex-pressed or implied.

I hope the manager can go along withthis. It has bipartisan support. Frank-ly, Mr. President, I see no conceivableobjection.

I ask for the adoption of this amend-men t.

Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, when thisbill was originally drawn 2 years ago we,of course, had a very extensive debatehere abotut whether or not all commit-tees ought to be limited to $5,000 orwhether we were going to create a spe-cial loophole a special situation, a spe-cial condition, for our own.

That is really what the issue here is.Are we going to say that labor commit-tees% and business committees and so-called good government conitttees, andall other committees, are limited to $5,-

;000, but when It comes to us that doesinot apply to the committees that con-tributes to us and to us only?

Ithose cases. if we are to adopt thisamendment, we would find ourselves giv-ing ourselves $20,000.

The absolute contribution limnitationon the Democratic National Committee.the State committees, county commit-tees, every other committee, is $5,000. Ifwe adopt this amendment, we are sayingthat that would apply to all but our ownIn-house committees.

The great p~roblem with this amend-ment is that because we wanted to keepthe party strong, we have said that anindividual may contribute to a partyc'ommlittee. the niational committee, orthe Democratic or Republican senatorialcommittees and congressional commit-tees, not just $5,000, but $25,000.

I think that is perhaps overly gener-ous, but It is In the bill and In the law.Any individual may contribute to thecongressional campaign committees andsenatorial campaign committees up to$25,000, If we are going to allow $20,000to go to a candidate, that means wereally open up and invite the possibilityof earmarking. At least, we make It ex-tremely difficult , to enforce the lawagainst earmarking because then wehave a way to pass at least $20,000 outof an individual and into the hand.- of aHouse or Senate Member.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Will the Senatoryield at that point?

Mr. CLARK. I do yield.Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator Is

aware that there is a specific law whichprohibits the earmarking?

Mr. CLARK. Yes.Mr. JOHNSTON. If someone, express-

ly or by implication, earmarks, then it isthe duty of the committee to so note thatearmarking and it is the duty of thecandidate to report that as if it were adirect contribution from the originaldonor and the final donee, the Senatcoris aware of that?

Mr. CLARK. Yes, that is why I wasvery careful in saying that it obviouslymakes it hard to enforce the earmark-Ing law. The earmarking law is the lawthe Senator Just described. Of course. ifone can identify someone who said, "Wewant this $20,000 to go to that candi-date," it Is against the law.

But we have to be very concerned inthe process of passing this legislationthat we do not invite difficulties in theenforcement of this law. I think thiswould do so.

Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator is notsuggesting that the chairman or thecommittees of this Congress would beparty to circumventing that law, eitherexpressly or inipliedly?

Mr. CLARK. No.Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator surely

is not doing that.Mr. CLARK. No. But obviously, not

every dollar that comes In to the cam-paign committee goes through the chair-man, is seen by him and passed on byhim.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Oh, yes, It Is. I begto disagree.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.GARN). If the Senator will yield. I a4-

S,.IsQ6 LUNL

ith Senator from Louisiana that his

at11litihlllt'lt Is not in order. Line 93 has n

.tlreadyv been deleted f rom the bill. pMr. ,)OHINSTON. Mr. Pre-sidcnt, I u

woutld. therefore, move to amend my a

.:Ijjt(qjtnjeift by str-ikinlg the words ''after t

t'xCt'Cd $5,000 add- and in lieui thereofiuvcet thle following "notwithstanding t

ally other provisioni of this act".II also want. to strike "except tliat" and I

put the clotes inl front of "the." So,a

thierefor'e, it would read as follows: t

Nota ithist'.idint; any other provision of C

tti Act 'the Repuiblicanr or De'mocraltic Suii- r

atorial Campnign Committee'

F.t Cetera.''Te PRTESIDING OFFICErZ. Thle ques-e

tion relnais, w&here does the Senator

wi ;h the nlnenclnient to comec in theI

bill?Mr. J'3h1INSTON. At the appiopriate

p~lace.The 1113ESIDING OFFICER. The

amfeindmen~lt is so modified.Thle amendment, as modified, is as

f ollo0ws:At the n'ppiopriate place In the bill In-

sert thie following, -Notwithstanding any

other provisionh of this Act t.he Republican

(I or uiniocratiC Senatorial Campaign Corn-

nittice. the Democratic National Coligres-

wnoi commt'ittee, the National Republican

Congressionial Committee, or the national

co 5 inttee of a political. party may contrib-

xite at any time imouirts not exceeding

e,2,(t~oo to candidates for Congress with re-

c'Ito an nsor all o le_.tjQi '1ntWL h

Mr .ONSTON. As I was saying to

the 13en'atol'. if I recall the question. ear-

jmarl; tg is totally impossible. and I am.sure this applies with equal force to the

ReIhpublica'n committee as it does withthe licin-crrctic committee.

Not one cent goes out to a political

candidate. I know this is true. It was true

77 when Senator BENTSEN was cliinan of

Ithe comumittee. It is true when I amIC1 chairmian of the committee.

Not one cent goes out that is notsigned by the chairman, cosigned by the

executive council and distributed undera plan generally perfected by the corn-

rnittee.evrcetomnyMr. CLAIU. If I understand the Sen-

tha istakn Ito hecommittee is per-sonllyrecivd b hiiand if there were

any conditions, assigned to that, he wouldbe aware of it?

Mr. JOHNSTON. No. Every cent that

goes out.MIm'1. CLARK. That goes out?Mr. JOHTTNSTON. That is right.Mr. CLARK. But not that comes in?.

Mr. JOI{NSTON. It is illegal to acceptunudeir conditions-unless they are ear-niar'led. and that is so stated.

Mr. CLARK, Right.Mr~. JOHNSTON. It does not go out

without thle chairman atctually signingthe check.

AL-. CLARK. I understand.Mr. JOHNSTON. So thrt it is impos-

si ble f or a staff er, f or examnple, to receivesoiflC money and understand the condi-tions and send it out of the committee.It comes through as it should, as It must,throug~h the chairman.

;RESSIONAL RECORD - SENA'

Mr. CLARK. Let me try to explainlore smcifically with regard to tisoint that I do not think we ougzht to tet.p a d itlfercnt, standa rd f or thle senatorialrid congressional campaign conimitteeshan we set tip for any other committee.

Particularly, I do not thiink we oughto set up a different, level of contribution.'here was a good deal of deb-ate here aittle while ago onl the Chiiles amendmentbout how much faith people have lost inhie system. liowv people believe big moneyorrupts and that special initeiests

Now the senator~ial and conp-ressionalampaigri cominijt-tees can receive moneyxactly the samec way, and from theatte kind of sourecs as any othter comn-niittee may.

Trhere is no restriction where they canake money.

I would argue that for us then to cre-ite a special category-every commit-.ee in America can spend so much ex-cept one committee, our committee--it isonly going to cause greater cynicism,and justifiably so, fionm the Americanelectorate.

Mr. JOHNSTON. I say to) my distin-guished friend that precisely the op-posite iresults come fr'om this committee.

Surely the Senator cannot compare aDemocr'atic comnmittee or a Republicancommittee to a labor committee or a busi-ness committee or any special interest.

Mr. CLARK. Why not?Mr. JOHNSTON. Because we have no

public initerest, other than the partyinterest.

Mr. CLARK. The Senator is going totake contributions from labor for theconumittee, is he not? it is exactly thesame dollar-from. business as well-wxhether for Republican or Democrat.

The Senator- makes no restriction 011

wher'e that money comes from.Mr. JOHNSTON. But it is comningled

in a common pot and given out withoutstrings.

That is the key, and that is the reasonfor this amendment.

if we assumie a certaini amount ofmoney i.-, essential in a campaign, and Ithink that is a safe assumption, then ifwe cannot get it from the committee.we get it directly fromn the special Ini-terest gr-oup, and is this not much betterthan getting it f romn the special interest?

Mr. CLARK. Is the Senator sayingthe camp~aignl committees handle moneythat is somehow ptirilled as compared tcthe Democratic National Committee 01the Republican National Committee 01

the State commlittees?Mr. JOINSTON. ThLs amendinellt I!

applicable to the Republican NationaCommittee and the Democratic Na

tional Committee and, yes, that is precisely what I aln saying. It is puriflebecause to the extent that there is an:

express or implied str'ings on the moneyor the appear'ance of strings on thmioney, then those strings are cut bgoing through this committee.

Mr. CLARK. Maybe I mlsundex'stoothe Senator's amendment.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Apparently, what?

Mr. CLARK. There are no copiesthe aindmenit available.

TEWOF Ma(rch 18, 1976Mr. JOHNSTON. I gave the Senator a

copy earlier. its a matter of fact.Mr. CLARK. It says:Except tnat the Republican or Democratic

Senatorial Campaign, Comnmit tee, the Demo-cratic National:1 Coxigresr,10nal Commnittee, theNational Reputllcan Congres sional Conimit-tee, or the nutional commiit tee of a politicalparty may contribtite, it any time amountsnot exceeding; $20,000 to candidates for con-gress with respect to akny or all of the elec-tions In which such candidates seek officeduring ant election year."

WVhat is being said is that every comn-inittee inl America is limited to $5,000.except the senatorial and congressionalcamphaign committees arid the nationalColl] III ittt'es.

Mr. .J0IfNSTON. That is precisely cor-recCt.

Mr. CLARK. Mr. Presicictnt, I wouldlike to say that what we tire doing nowis saiying to thle Democratic NationalCommittee. "You cannot only give $5,000under the present law, you call spend 2cents a voter for every voter in a State,with a minimum of $20,000, on behalfof a candidate. So you can spend $5.000now plus $20,000 or 2 cents a voter,whichever is more. Now we are going tolift that limit of $5,000 all the way to$20,000."

That means- the Democratic NationalCommittee and the Republican NationalCommittee can now contribute a mii-mum of $40,000 to any candidate in Con-gress. Apparently, according to theamendment, it could not do that for thePresident. He would be restricted to$5,000. But Senators and Congressmenwould be allowed $20.000 in direct cashand a minilnuln of $20,000 in expendi-tures on their behalf. That is flow a$40,000 minimumi limitation that can beeither given directly or spent onl theirbehalf.

Am I interpreting the amendment cor-rectly?

Mr. JOHNSTON. ji~Thlafdments u pl ~hngsJ~iPanaggregate of

W5~,000 to an aggregate of-$230000t-ata

,F6Eiiite_., It does not change in anyWTh_%6iat he may get otherwise. Rightnow, as I understand the law, a candi-date may have expenditures made on hisbehalf by the national commnittee to theextent of $20,000 and he may have spenton his behalf by the Congressional Comn-mittee $15,000, assuming he has a pri-

mary, a runoff and a general election.All this changes is that $15,000 provisionto a $20,000 provision, and it takes overthe requirement that there are threeelectins. 1pi( L other words tlhgX2aY~gCt

S$20,000 evenF they only ae a nen-,,1 eecti on.

I would suggest to the Senator we are-not changing it to allow the $40,000 but

simply changing it from the $15,000 tothe $20,000. If a candidate were so luckyto get the full $40,000, and I submit that

e Is going to be very rare indeed, what isYwrong wvith that? Is it not better for him

to get that money, which I submit is pur-d ified. rather than get it directly from the

special interest group, directly from thelabor group or directly from the business

)f group?)Mr. CLARK. I miust say that I do not

-458

March 18, 1976 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE S30

share the Senator's view that somehowthe mioney that goes through the Sena-torial Cainpairm7 Committee or the Con-gressional Campaign Committee is as

*pure as the driven snow, and the moneythiat conies rrorn individuals who partic-ipate ill labor is tainted or businessmoney is tAtinted.

Mr. JOHNSTON. It Is not that It istainted. it is that they have a specialpoint of view and they give their moneyto promote candidates who share thatpoint of view.

Mr. CLARK. I assume if that were theonly criterion, the Democratic Commit-tue gives it to candidates that share theirview and the Republicans give It to can-didates that share their view.

Mr. JOHNSTON. No, that-is not so, be-cause any member of the DemocraticCaucus, regardless of his view, even if attimes it strays from the majority, is enl-titled to his share of the money.

Mir. CLARK. But it Is a Democraticview. Thley are not giving money to any-body but Democrats or they are not glv-

* Ing mioney to anybody but Republicans.Mr. JOHNSTON. That may be so. but

that, I submit, is under our system ofgovert~ment, which, in effect, has enl-ihrlned thle two-party system. That isp~ermissible and that is the kind of taint,if the party puts a taint on money, that

* our system of government envisions andendorses and has run, on traditionally.NC) one out there in America can saybecause a. party gives someone mioneythat there is anything wrong with that.Thlat is traditional American politics.

Mr. CLARK. I think what the amend-wient does and what it says is quite clear.I would like the Senator from Louisianato correct me if I am wrong. Every singleconmnittee inl the United States that fallsundler this law would have a $5,000 lim-itation on the amount that they can con-tribute, with two exceptions carved outby this ainendment: The national com-inittec-s of the two major parties and thecongressional and senatorial committeesof the two major parties. In those casesthey would be allowed to give $20,000 indirect, cash plus, in accordance with thepresent law, the national party commit-tees would be allowed to spend a mini-mum of $20,000 on their behalf.

That means that we are going to ar-rive at a conclusion where the two na-tional committees can now spend an ag-gregate of $40,000. $20,000 indirect and$20,000 direct, $40,000 minimum. In thoseStates where two cents a voter amountsto mnore than $20,000, they would be ableto spend in excess of that.

Mr. JOHNSTON. W~ill the Senatoryield for a question?

Mr. CLARK. Yes.Mr. JOHNiSTON. I-ow much canl those

sources now spend, assuming there is aprimary, a runoff, and a general election?

Mr. CLARK. First of all, let us assumethat the primary, runoff, and generalelection do not occur in at least half ofthe races in America. We have never hada runoff, to my knowledge, in any placein My part of the country. I do not thinkone can assume that one automaticallygets $5,000 In three elections. I think onthle average there wiU be two elections,and on some occasions three elections.

Thlat is direct money. What the Senatoris suggresting Is that in those cases wherethere is a primary and a general electionwe would be able to double that to$20,000. I think it only means the Intro-durtion of bigger money into politics andgreater cynicism about it, particularlywhen we are doing it for ourselves, par-ticularly when we are doing it to our owncomin nIttees.

As I say, we dlebated this at length 2years ago. Maybe the Senate feels dif-ferently about it now, but I feel verystrongly that if we were to say that ourcommittees, ought, to be diff erent, that weought to be able to give $20,000 insteadof $5,000, we would come in for a greatdleal of justifiable criticism.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, Justone final word. I believe the amendmentIs well widerstood. I would like to simplypoint out that the $20,000 the NationalCommittee may now spend on behalf ofa candidate is not inserted by thisamendlment. That is not changed bythis amendment. All thsk .n i4does Is inr Jaj0 ttof~1Tchfip aign committees from an ag-

'~l~i~i~~ii~ saywe are do-ing it for ourselves, what we mean isthat we are doing it for any candidatefor national oflice. whether hie be a con-resfsional candidate or a senatorial can-

didate. In that sense, this is not a clubamendment, if one wants to call it that.It is not for incumibents: it is for anycandidate that the committee may givemioney to.

Mr. ALLEN. Will the Senator yield?Mir. JOHNSTON. Yes, I will yield.Mr. ALLI'$N. This would cover pri-

maries and run-off primaries as well,wvould it not?

Mr. JOHNSTON. That Is correct. Un-der the present law, thle campaign com-mittee can give $5,000 for the primary,$5,000 in a run-off, and then, another$5,000 in thle general election, which isa total of $15,000. What this, would al-low is to give the committee some flexi-bility. If the Senator's tough race Is thegeneral, hie could withhold the whole$20,000 until that time.

Mr. ALLEN. I-ow often do either ofthle committees contribute to a chial-leng-er of anl Incumbent?

Mr. JOHNSTON. In the case of thesDemocratic Committee that is, not done.

Mr. ALLEN. In other words, this, then,is just for the benefit of incumbents;is that not right?

Mr. JOHNSTON. It would also applyto thle cha"llenigers, I mean in those caseswhere an Incumbent is beaten and a newincumbent is elected.

Mr. ALLEN. That is right: in otherwords, in general elections. But throughthe primaries, first and second, it wouldbe the inlcumbent who was taken care of.I have no otject ioni to taking care of inl-cumbents, but-

M1%r. JOHNSTON. Except inl cases whereV0ou have no0 incm11benlts, as inl the caseof retirees.

Mr. ALLEN. 13ut 'where there is anincumbent, thei-e would be no impedi-

muent to any Incumbent receiving funds,in the general election or primary, eitherone.

Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator is cor-rect in the point he makes, in the sensethat that Is the standard operating pro-cedure under which we have operated,and I see no movement to change It. Butthe Senator is correct in the point hemakes.

Mr. ALLEN. I just want us to under-stand what we are voting on. As long asthe incumbent is in the picture, he Is theone who gets the benefit of the Increasedamount. *.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Not Just the incum-bent.

Mr. ALLEN. I say, as long a-s the in-cumbe'nt is in the picture, though, hiewould be the one to really benefit.

Mr. TAFT. Mr. President. will the Senl-ator yield?

Mr. JOHNSTON. I yield to the Sena-tor f rom Ohio.

Mr. ALLEN. But is that not true?Mr. JOHNSTON. Yes; the Senator Is

correct.Mr. TAFT. Is it not true that that de-

p~ends upon what the committee involveddesired to do? If the committee involveddesired to make other rules. it couldmake other rules as to thle distributionof those donations.

Mr. JOHNSTON. That is correct.There is no rule that specifies how a na-tional committee or a senatorial coni-mit tee is going to spend its money.

Mr. TAFT. Well, the Senator is notent*'irely correct, The Republicani sena-torial committee does have certain rules.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Well, yes.Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, will the

Senator yield?Mr. JOHNSTON. I yield.Mr. CLARK. I would like to ask the

Senator if his amendment would allowthe national committee to give moremoney to a Presidential campaign. Doesit increase the limit that may be givento a Presidential candidate?

Mr. JOHNSTON. I do not believe so.It is not intended to, and I do not be-lieve that the phraseology is subject tothat interpretation.

Mr. CLARK. That is the way I wouldinterpret it. Therefore, I wonder if thiswould not be Interpreted, and quite ac-curately, as an amendment aimned only,at helping Senators and Members of Con-grees. The Senator seeks to permit, thosenational committees to give us more, butnot the President more. We are not rais-Ing the amount the national comm-itteecan give to a President; that remains thesame,

Mr. JOHNSTON. That is correct.Mr. CLARK. So it seems to me all wve

are doing Is saying we want to funnel alot more money into Senate and conigres-sional campaigns through giving the na-t ional committee a separate contributionlimitation, and the same with the cam-paign committees. I do not see how itcould be Interpreted except that way, asa nieans of getting more money into ourown congressional campaigns.

I think, as the Senator from Alabamahas- emphasized, it is merely a means of

459)

S3807

ONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SEN* March 18, 197ro

J,

t

-Itl

F.Ik'l,

1il tIttt

BItch tou

BtuckleyByrdt, Rol~t-IC . tiO LiCase

CIn rtistl

D~ole

(;,I I itt

OriflliHansenHas~kell

liathavvayliruska

C. IilictclestlliHio niplirey

Jo iu stonLaisiltLcaith'LongNI gmsiisoiilMlnoiizld

Mi-:CluLreMc CceNioii IoyaD'JtirkieNelsonPackwood

Pastom ePellPercyProx miire

Iibi coftS:h weik enScott, iHighbcott,

William L.SpasrkmanSleillsStevens

NyxizgtonToift'Tali a d,,eThminnidTlowerTunn meyWe i ckerW~Viil lims

Abotiii, icAllenJtc"llii iii ciBtrockIt rco k c

HkiipersBurd ickBvinl,

Mum-r F~.,.1r.(hid.

llNATS-10ClarkCIlver,Du riciHart, CairHart. Philip A.

Knn Coey

Nid ii:yre

Metl .fN1i d a I eMlorg i

MossNinPeiarsonRotihSte cll~iolStolle

itt Iing miore nlnoti Into an lncurribent's41111:,ign. because this amendment does

Ii rinlcumlbents. For all those reasons,,%I r, Pi esident. I hope the Senate will notiipt this amendment, because I thinkii \,.' open uip (lie flood gates and sayhis commnittee ought to go from $5,000

to S$20,000. we will have a very difficultiie inllY ainlf; that State comminittees.

cominty commiiittees,. and other commit-cc, ought not to be able to do that. Then

we \\ ill not have a $5,000 limitatioin onlconsinlit tees, b~ut a $20,000 limitation.After~ all, how does one justify increas-Ii; fr-om $5,000 to $20,000 for nationalcoiniittees, aiicl not State committees?

M \,r. JOHINSTON. Mr. President, willlie Senator yield at that point so that

I may ask for the yeas and nays?Mi'. CLARK.,. Yes.Nil'. .JOHNSTON. Mr. President. I a-sk

for the yeas and niays.T'he ACTING PRESIDENT pro temi-

pore' MAr. HANSEN). IS there a sufficientsecondi? There is a sufficient second.

Thle yeas and nays were ordered.Nlr. JOHNSTON. I thank the Senator.NMrI. CLARX. Mr. President, I am pre-

paired to yield back the remainder of mnytitilie.

Mr. JOHNSTON. I yield back the re-iiut incler of miy time.

T'he ACTING PRESIDENT pro teni-l-e. All remaining time having been

yie('ld back, the question is onl agreeingto the amlendmnent of the Senator fromLouisiana (Mlr. JOHNSTON). On thiscjut-stion, the yeas and nays have beenordered, and the clerk will, call the roll.

lhe legislative clerk called the roll.Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. I announce

that the Senator from Idaho (Mr.Cl iClI) , the Senator from Indiana (Mfr.1tITAE), and the Senator from Wash-inkton (Mlr. JACKSON) are necessarilyab:;ent.

I further announce that, if presentmnd voting, the Senator from Washing-tonl (Mr. JACK~SON) would vote "yea."

Mr. GRIFFIN. I announce that theSenator from North Carolina (MIvr.

mi:Ls)ad the Senator from NorthDakota (MNr. YOUNG) are necessarilyabsent.

I further announce that the Senatorfrom Vermiont kMr. STAFFORD) is absentclue to illness.

I further announce that, if presentand voting, the Senator from NorthCarolina (Mir. HELMS) would vote "yea."

, 'ihe r'esult was announced-e- 64.na, ys 30. as follows:

I Roticll Vote No. 85 Le4-g.1YEAS-64

('Imirchiflan ke

HeittisJlackson

StaffordYou iig

-NM ' '- ANNON. The President. I moveto reconsider the vote by which the famnendment was agreed to.a

Mr. TAFT'. I mnove to lay that on the 0Itable.

The motion to lay on thle Lible wasatgreeCd to.

Mr.. TAFT. Mi'. Piresident, I send to thedlesk anl amendmnent to the pending sub-stitute by Mr. GRlIFFIN. t

The PRESIDING OFFICER. 'The (aneiidnient will be stzated.

True second assistant leg-islative clerktproceeded to read the amendment.

Mr. TAFT. I ask unanimous consentthat fturther reading of the amendmrentbe dispenised with.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. WithoutObjection, it is, so ordered.

The amiendment is as follows:On pagte 1. in stibection (c) (I) after the

word "ballot., add the following: 'or certi-

fies to the' Ccsninii.lof that hie will iiot be

all act ive candscidate ii I hc primary'.

At. thle end of siibsect inn (c) i I) add the

following niew sf'aleice: "TIhe provisions of

this Sect(in shasli apply as of thle dlale ofeIliactI fieint''

Mr. TAFT. This is an anienciment thathad. ilready passed onl the fi'st Griffinsubstitute and onl tile bill itself. I amn at-tempting now to put it into the sec~ondGriffin substitute. As the Mdembers of the

Senate N':ho vei'e here wvill recall, theamendmient relates to a limitation onl thepayout share to the Presidential can-cdidates. It eliminates candidates who,foi' two consecutive primai'ies, haveunder 10 percent of the vote in thosepiiaries. w;it-h the provision that Senia-tot' BAYTH asked to be included, to theeffect that if a candidate wishies to cer-tify that he is not anl active candidate.this will not count against him Ii thatpi'ima,iy so far as elimlination is con-cerined. I know of no objection to it. Itwent through by a voice vote originally.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President. do I unl-derstand correctly that this is the sameamnidment to decertify Presidentialcandidates pr'ovidled that they do not, geta certain percent of the votes in the pi'i-mai'y, and this is the amendment thatwas offei'ed befoic to S. 3065 and also tothle previoiLs Griffin substitute?

Mr. TAFT. The Senator is entirelycorrec t.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I amiwilling to accept the amiendmrent. I thinkit is a g-ood amiendment.

The PRTESIDING OFFICER. The clues-tianl is onl qsrccing to the amendinent.

The amiendmnent was agreed to.Mi'. CIRANSTON. Mr. Prec-mdent. I siend

an amiendment, to the desk and osk lorit's inlimiitcc I I consideration.

NOT VOTING-6

460

1s "I()SsTMr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President. will)(I Senator *yield?Mr. CRANSTON. Cer'tinly.

OiDIFICAT10N ORDER TO RE-P~OwR SENAT E R ,ESOLUTION 400

Mr. MANSFIEL . If I may have thettentionl of thle Se ate, I itsk unaimou,ozuwent that the si-der of the Senateiauidatig the Set ite Rules Committeeoreport Senate lesolution 400 estalb-.iiing a Standing Commiittee on Intel-gence Activities o iMarch 20. 1976. beioclified as follows,Senate Resoluti n 400 be reported

orthiwith from the Committee onl Rule.,.rid Immediately b referred sirnultane-utsly to the Comm tee onl the Judiciatryincl to the Comnmit cc on Rules;That tile Commi tee onl the Judiciary

lake Its re ointriidations on &,rnatele!;olutliln 400 not later than the close)f btluiiC5,; il O Mar h 29. 1976 and thathie recornmendatio of the Committeein the Judiciary be *efcrred without fur-.her action by the S -nate to the Commit-~ee on Rules; andThat the Rules ommittee report its

final recommendat ns not later than)April 5, 1976.

Mr. JAVITS. Mr. resident, may I Ii-quire-

Mr. MIANSFIEL .This has beencleared.

Mr. JAVITS. Nil. President, I justwanted to know th t , because I happento be the only ran ing member of theCommittee on GoV, rninent Operationshere.I

Mr. MIANSFIELD I looked for theSenator, but he w,,) not available, Ilewa-s in a hearing.

Mr. JAVITS. I unic ristand.Mir. N.LNNSFIELD I cleared it vith

Senators CANNON. LATFIELD. EASTLAND,TuNxEY. HART, Byr HRUSKA, RIBICOFF.and SCOTT.

Mr. JAVITS. Hast been cleared withMr. PERCY, the rank gmember?

Mr. ,MANSFIELD I shall trust theSenator front Newv Y rk to get him.

Mr. JAVITS. I sh. I not object. I justwanted to know that.

Mr. MANSFIELD. I thank the Sen-a tor.

FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACTAMENDMENTS OF .1976

The Senate continued with the con-sideration of the bill (S. 3065) to amiendthe Federal Election Campaign Act of1971 to provide for its administrationby a Federal Election Commission ap-pointed in accordance with the require-ments of the Constitution. and for otherp)urposes.

Mr. CRANSTON. I yield to the Senatorfrom Oklahoma for a unanimous-con-sent requet

Mr. BLARTLETT. I as k uinanimous con -sent that Doni Cogmian. of my Staff beaccorded privileges of the floor duringconsideration of this measure.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Withoutobiection, it is so ordered.

Mit. CRANSTON. I send an amend-meat to the desk and ask for its (-oii-sideratioli.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Tileamendment will be sta ted.

N___ M __m

WARMS

NGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENA9 March 24, 1976

societies de oted t0 f tering the explorationof tpace through spa e science and the de-velopment of space echnolog7 and spacelnw; and

V,"ereas the Inter ational Antronauticatlrederat ion said Its Hated organizations,the International. AC lemy or Astronauticsand the I nternational nstitutO or Space Law.represent the world's ending authorities Inasitronautics, the spa e sciences and spacelaw: and

Whereas the Inter! itional AstronauticalFederation will hold ts 27th Congress InAnaheim, California, tring 1976, the Bicen-teniatl Year or otir N ton, In rocognitTon ofthe vital contribution maznle by the UnitedStates to the scientifi l tec'inical and legalwealthl oif our clvilizati* n: and

Whereas the host tr ganizations for this27th ('on~jess. to be 'ailed the "IA? '76"Congres,,. aire the A 'erican Institute orAeronauitics and Astro :autics, the AmericanAstronautical Society, he Aerospace MedicalAssociait.ion, the New rkCardiological So-ciety and the Rocke Research Institute,In1c.: and

Wher'eas the "TAF '7 ' Congress wtl be at-tendedi by hundreds of people who belong totho 11tt,'ruational Astrinautical Federation'satflilited organizations tnd member societiesfrom ninny nations; an(

Whereas the "IA? '71 Congress %ill con-duclt ressions and prest it papers In all areasof mt ronautics, and tU space sciences, and

t% space law thereby advai cing and strengthen-inj;r tiiternationfail coo eration and under-standiing in these crit 'al areas of science.

S tCehelloy, and law; aWherea-s the Atneric iRevolution Blicen-

tenil Administration recognizes the "lAF'76" Congress as a signi I cant contribution totho lloric'on '76 themne the national L3lcen-

.*, temuilM coinnmenioratio andWhiereas the Intern tonal Astronautical

i'cderatonl, Its affliate organizatllons, andS us membecr societies r )resent considerable

hope and p~romise to th world for the con-tinned advancemenst o man's accomplish-Intents In the fields of tou ronautics, the sppcecliivvse, and space la , such accoinpliab

inenti having brought at better life to allS humnanity; and

Whereas the Interna tonal AstronauticalFede-ratiots strongly sup )orts man's explora-tion of space and the p oper use of the en-vironmient. of space in rdcr to help fulfillnian's, greatest -zpiratio s and meet his vitalneeds on earth: Now, th refore, be It

.Vetolved, That the S nate of the Unitedttes recognizes the Im ortance of the 27th

Congress of the Intern ional AstronauticalFederation to be held In naheim. California,

'IS from October 10 throu October 16, 1976;commends the Titerna onal AstronauticalFederation and Its affilia 4'd organizations forselecting the United St 4tes a the location.for Its 27th Congress i4recognition of the13lcentennial ot the Unit d States: and coam-miends the host orgawniz. tons of the UnItedStates for sponsoring t' Congress.

Sec. 2. The Secretary if the Senate shalltransmit a suitably ens ribed copy of thisresolution to the Interns ional AstronauticalFederation.

M r. MIOSS. I thank he Senator fromNevada for his kindi

FTEDF-MAL E-LECTON CAMPAIGN ACTAM; ENDMENTS OF 1976

Th e Senate continued with the con-sideration of the bill (S. 3065) to amendthe Federal Election Campaign Act of1971 to provide for its administration by

0 a Federal Election Commission appointedIn arcoldance with the requirements ofthe Constitution, and for other purposes.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, what Isthe pending business?

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. The pending business is S. 3065.

*71MWMNT NO. 151e

Mfr. CANNON. Mr. President, I call upmy amendment in the form of a substi-tute toS. 3065.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. The clerk will state the amend-ment.

The legislative clerk read as follows:The Senator from Nevada (Mir. CANNON')

for hirns'elf, Mr. HIATFIELD, Mir. MANsFirI.D.Mr. HUGuH SCOTTr, Mr. RoDeAT C. Bxan and Mr.GaRFFIN proposesi an amendment In thenature of a substitute niumbercd 1516.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I asktuiannious c'onsent that the reading ofthe substitute be dispenised with.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. Without objection, it is so ordered.

(The amenldmnt is printed in theRECORD of March 23, 1976. pages S4066through S4074.)

M~r. CANNON. Mr. President, yester-day afternion an amelndmnent in thef orm of a substitute to S. 3065 was in-troduced by myself, Senator HATFIELD,

Senator MAUNSFIELD, Senator HuGit ScoT,Senator ROCERT C. BYRD, and SenatorGRIFFIN. This stubstitute represents anattempt by both sides of the aisles toset forth a reasonable compromise pro-posal which we can discuss and hope-fully reach agreement on in the nearf uture.

It is understood that there are a num-ber of amnendmnents to this substitutewxhich will be proposed and consideredby the Senate. At this time, however, Iwould like to set forth the changes andmodifications which this substituteamendment would make to S. 3065 as ithad been amended on the floor prior toyesterday.

The essential structure, and in manyimportant respects, the substance of S.3065 remains intact with the followingmodifications:

First of all, section 102 of S. 3065.creating an eight-member commission-the ntunber of commnissioners was ex-panded from six to eight by SenatorMATHIAS'S amnendmnent which was ap-proved by the Senate-remains thesame. with the deletion of the provisionprohibiting outside business activities ofcommissioners and the deletion of theprovision r'equiring in a majority voteof the commission that no less than twoof the flve-melnber majority be affiliatedwith the same political party.

In the definitional section 102 a provi-sion was; added excluding from the def-inition of expenditure for limitation pur-poses partisan activity designed to en-courage Individuals to register to vote,or to vote, conducted by the nationalcommittee of a poilitical party, or a sub-ordinate committee thereof, or the St-atecommittee of a national party. Such par-tisan activity would, however, be requiredto be reported. This addition had beenapproved by the Senate ais an amend-ment to an earlier substitulte but had notbeen proposed as an amendment to S.3065. In addition, the substitute woulddelete a surplus definition of indep-end-emit expenditure which is not used in thebill or the substitute as a defined term.

Section 104 of S. 3065 contained some

provisions related to reports by politicalcommittees and candidates, in particularthe reporting requirement for Independ-ent expenditures. Here the substitute hasinclude the reporting requirement pro-posed by Senator PACKWOOD for expendi-ttlres made by corporations' and labororgantizations' communications to theirstockholders or members expressly advo-cating the election or defeat of a clearlyidentified candidate. This reporting re-quirement h-as been expanded to equi-tably apply to all membership organiza-tions requiring them to report expendi-tures directly attributable to such com-munications and for that reason hasbeen tran.'ferred to the reporting sec-tionis of the net from the section whichdealt only with corporations an~d labororfranizations.

I might add here that I understandthat there will be an amendment pro-posed to set forth a reasonable floor onsuch reports to the Commission to re-lieve the burden of such reporting onsmall businesses and membership orga-nizations, as wvell as to clarify the natureof the expenditures which must be re-ported. I personally feel such an amend-ment would be an equitable and clarify-ing addition to this disclosure provisionand intend to give It my strong support.

The portions of S. 3065 which relate tothe general enforcement powers of theCommlission which have been previouslydiiscussed on the floor remain intact.These are sections 106 and 108 of S.3065 and the only change is a minor oneto clarify that where a conciliationag-reelnent. unless violated, constitutesan absolute bar to any further action by.the Commission, it is a bar to furthcraction with respect to the violationwhich is the subject of the agreement.

The substitute amendment deletes P11the advisory opinion pro-visions of S.3065. The effect of this is to retain exist-ing law in section 437f of title 2. UnitedStates Code, exactly as It now It.

The substitute also would delete thoseprovisions in S. 3065 relating to theHouse of Representatives procedure forconsidering the Commission's propposedrules and regulations, leaving this as amatter for the House to act upon at alater time.

The substitute does not make anychanges in the section of S. 3065 relatingto limitations on contributions and ex-penditures, as amended to date by theSenate, except In the following specificrespects. Fir'st, a provision is added toprovide for an unlimited transfer offunds between and among political com-mittees of the same political party to-gether with a provision to assure thatthe antiproliferation rule of S. 3065would not apply to contributions by apolitical party through a national comn-mittee and to contributions by that partythrough a single State committee in eachState. Second, the amendment to S. 3065proposed by Senator JOHNSTON and pre-viously adlopted by the Senate is modi-fied to clarify that contributions by...thespecifled..party no Eonites Y6;6 agr egate no ;lan....,2000 in an lcctionye a -- U1X

This substitute also modifies the sec-tion of S. 3065 related to the solicitation

492

S .1150

4

0S 4138 GONG]

quest is to allOw Senators who opposethis tune22dlneflt to be noUfled so theycan be present; isthStOOITSCt? de'

Mr. PACItWOOD. That is correct.Mr. AU~N. I have no objection, ha'ihe PREStDINO OFFICKR.. Without

Ol)j(\'tJOfl, It 15 so ordered.. tie'rue ChaIr in his capacity as the Sena-

tor from Wisconsin suggest.5 the absenceof a quorum, and the clerk will call the tbroll.

The second assIstant legislative clerk wiproceeded to call the roll..

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. president, I ask prunanimOus wnsent that the order forthe quorum call be rescinded.

Tho P1V~ WINO OFFICER (Mr. tbNEL~Ot~). Without objection, it is so or-dered.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I havean amendment which I send to the desk tli

ask for lt.s immediate consideration. ai

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Thear~cndiUCflt will be stated. W

The legislative clerk read as follows:On psge 35, 11210 15. strike the

If'~s.5 oi IIepreaientatlVes." t1On p~g0 35. begizinlng with lIne 21. strIke PS

tbt' w~~rdA "the Democratic National Coi1~~r'$~ lo~~l CouimittCC. the National Repubil'

(liii GongrC~8IOr14 Comznltt.00, 4:

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President. a few Ic(Ilys ago, I offered an amendment on be- Ii

half of myself. Senator STuVENS, and ~8eultOr BE:~TSEN. the effect of which ~we ul ci be to increase the amount whichse~viWricl campaign cmmltteeS and the pl'Oi~.SC ccmpalgii committees could give, ~'

to a esndidate from $~.000 per election to,,,, C

~ZC~XOO per year. After that amendmentl~sJ pacacci-of course, we have inter- ~veiicd with this substitute bill, but, in the ~meantime, we have heard from our col- ~lcssl.1C's In the House, who tell us that ~z~klng this applicable to the House ~coirmnmittees would have the untoward ~nud unwanted effect of raising expecta- ~tiuns of house Members way beyond re-ality. They tell us that, whereas they maybe able to give $1,000 or $2,000 per Mem-ber of Congress. with this kind of lan-guage, Members of Congress would comeIn expc~ctiflg their $20,000.

I do not know whether we are going tobe able to approach anything close to I

those kinds of numbers on the Senatecampaign committees. We shall have towalt to see how our respective fund-rais-bag events come out to determine howsuccessful we are In that respect. But theIlouse people assure us that it is waybeyond reality and It would have the verymischievous effect of disappointing manyMembers of the House. Accordingly, they.asked to be deleted from the specialtreatment which our amendment of lastweek gave. ALl this amendment, there-fore, does is excise the words 'Congress"or "Democratic congressional Commit-tee" or "Republic Congressional Corn-mlttee" from the a.mencinleflt, which. Intuna, rnakes.the.9.mefld.mCflt. the $20,000limit, applicable onlyto the Senate.colfl'nsittces and not to the 1ouse.connm!ttees~..

Mr. CANNON. Mr. president, that

amendment Is acceptable to me as thenmana.ger of the bill, on the basis that theScriator has stated It. I am willing to ac-cept the amendment.

R,,ESSIONAL RECORD - SENA~.(r. JOHNSTON. I thank my colleague.

ask for Its consideration. Mr. Presi-nt.~dr. PACKWOOD. Mr. President, Iye no objection to the amendment.I'he PRESIDING OFFICER. The ques-n is on agreeing to the amendment.The amendment was agreed to.Nfr. CANNON. Mr. President, I suggesto absence of a quorum.The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerkII call the roll,The second assist.ant legislative clerkocecded to call the roll.Mr. CANNON. Mr. President. I askmanimous consent that the order forC Quorum call be rescinded.The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without~jection, it Is so ordered.Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, I send toic desk an unprinted amendment andli that It be read.The PRESIDING OFFICER, The clerkill state the amendment.The legislative clerk read as follows.:On page 25. between lines 4 and 5, Inserte following:mOHm5t1~iON OH CONVERSION 01' COKTKIBUTONS

TO PDSONAL us:

SEC. 107A. Section 31'? of the Act (2 USC.39a). as redesignated by sectIon 105, 15nended by striking out "or may be usedr any other lawful purpO5e.~' and insertinglIou therc'of the following ~'may be coil-

ibuted to him to the National coinxiiit.tecr State committee of a politIcal party, 01

,turned by him to hIs contributors Oil U

ro rate basis (as determIned by the Coal'ilsiloil), or contrIbuted by him to anotbefandidate."

Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, the pur-ose of this amendment clearly Is slimly to correct a flaw in the present law~'hlch could, under certain circurn'tances, result In the conversion of exceaf,ampalgn funds to personal use. Thl~Lmendment would simpuy add a sectiotwhereby we would correct that.

I might say this amendment was s'~g.rested by Congressman BERKLEY BEDELL

think it Is a good one. We have talke.o the manager of the bill and to othe'~arties interested in this bill. What Iwould do, frankly, is to say that, IIIddition, if one has campaign contrlbUlion money left over, in addition to thIwo present ways in which that rnone;can be disposed of~namely, to defraomee expenses or to contribute tocharity-we are now providing threadditional ways that the money can bdisposed of without converting to personal use. Those are to contribute It ta State or National party committee, tcontribute it to another candidatecommittee, or to return It on a pro ratbasis to the contributors.

We think this Is Important becau~be know historically that money hrbeen converted from political commiltees to personal use If income tax Is palon It, and we would like to prevent thaand that is the purpose of the amenment, and I urge its adoption.

Mr. PACKWOOD. Mr. President, wthe Senator from Iowa yield?

Mr. CLARK. I yield.

Mr. PACKWOOD. Do I understalfrom the Senator's amendment thatthe moment a candidate would be pr

0TE March 24, 1976hibited from giving this surplus to theNational committee or a State commit-tee?

Mr. CLARK. It Is not clear whetherthey would be prevented Under presentlaw, but we would like to make It veryclear, at any rate, that that ivould bepermissible under the law.

Mr. PACKWOOD. Well. In that case,why strike out "for any other lawfulpurpose" Why not add the Senator'samendment Indicating this Is a lawfulpurpose?

Mr. CLARK, Well, the reason we arestrll:lng '~f or any other lawful purpose"even though that phrase seems to usrather clearly to allow State and Na.-ttonal committees to take funds is thatwe would like to make It possible Inaddition for them to return the moneyto their contributors as an alternativeway of disposing of the money and toallow them to contribute to anothercandidate.

In other words, It Is not at afl clearthat those other two methods we arenow adding are permissible under thelaw presently.

Mr. PACEWOOD. I have no objectionto the Senator's amendment, but I comeback again why not simply leave In "forany other lawful purpose" and put In theSenator's deifflitions of lawful purpese.what that would Include. What are westriking out when we strike cut "or forany other lawful purpose"? What can acandidate now do with money that acandidate could not do with thatstricken out?

Mr. CLARK. The point is under thepresent law It seems quite clear that aperson can convert campaign funds topersonal use If he pays Income tax on It

lawfully, and that is why we are strik-ing that section and specifying the exactways In which the money can be con-verted. In other words, It would leavethe bill as it is under present law if weleave this phrase in, that candidates canindeed convert campaign funds for per-

sonal What bothers me-

and I agree with the Senator that they~ should not be converted to personaluse-is what might be any other lawful0 purpose we are thinking of that Is noty conversion to personal use that we arey striking out by striking out that phrase?a Mr. CLARK. Well, we are not aware of

any other purpose for which campaigne funds, in our judgment, ought to be used.

Mr. PACEWOOD. Mr. president, willthe Senator withhold his amendmentthen and let me try to draft an amend-

a ment because I agree with the Senatorabout conversion, but I would like tomake sure that we limit It to that pur-

~ pose.When we legislate on the floor, things

Id come up that we do not think about.*~. and I would not want us to trap a mcm-~ ber. vnconsciously trap a member, of the

House or of the Senate who Is now

ill spending it for a lawful conversion andwhich that amendment might strike out.

Mr. CLARK. I would be happy to con-id sult with the Senator.at Mr. President, I request that niyo- amendment be withdrawn.

300

-j

S3Iy31976 co

It is therefore grossly misleading tosuvwest that the inclusion in this bill ofp)rovisions5 clarifying tht! political activi-ties. permitted to corporations and laborunions Is an attempt to "change therules" in niidstreCamn.

Onl thle contrary, what the conferencecommittee has done Is to restore the ruleswhichi governed Federal elections from1971 until the CommissiOn'S Sun Oil de-cisionl last December.

We have, moreover, dont- so in a manl-nier that is fair and evenhanded.

A labor union, like a corporation, mayestablisli only one political committee,so that the limitations the act imposesonl contributionls iay not be avoided.

Similairly, a labor union, like a corpora-tion, iust report voter registration andget -out -the-vote expenditures made onbehialf of a specific candidate in excessof $2,000 per election.

And a labor union. ilke a corporation,many solicit contributions from the non-organwetd employees of a company onlytwice it year, and then only by mall.

Mr. Speaker, if the word "fairness" im-.pliecs at balancing of rights, this bill rep-resentis an equitable balance between the

f%., rights~ of corporations and labor unions.It is thie product of deliberation, negotia-tion anid compromise.

It ii a good bill supported by membersof thlt conference committee of both

It is strongly supported by CommonCause, which has been a vigorous chain-pion of campaign reform.

It wvill bring to an end the hiatus iniI Federal matching funds which during

the List month has hampered candidatesfor P~resident in both parties.

I urge all Members to cast their votein favor of the reasonable provisions emn-

S bodied in this bill in order that we mightsend it to the President without furtherdelay.

And I would then urge the Presidentto slin the measure into law. A veto

( would be most irresponsible on his part.We miust, have clean elections in thiscountry.

Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, will thegentleman yield?

N Mr. BRADEMAS. I yield to the gentle-mnan from New Jersey.

(Mr. THOMPSON asked and was givenpermission to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentleman and I would liketo associate myself with the gentleman'sremarks. Having been one of those whoentgaged in a colloquy to establish therules in 1971, 1 felt very strongly -aboutthle misinterpretations of the Commis-sion in handing down SUNPAC. I mustsay that the fial solution arrived at bythe conference, thanks to the chairman,the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. HAYS),the gentleman from California (Mr.WIGGINS). the gentleman in the well andOthers, It seems to me an eminently fairsolution to this difficult problem.

Mr. I3RADE-MAS. -Mr. Speaker, I thankthe gentleman from New Jersey.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yieldsuch time as he may consume to thegentleman from South Dakota (Mr.PRESSLER),

(Mr. PRESSLLER asked and was given

N4GRESS1ONAL RECORD - 11USEpermisslon to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. PRESSLER. Mr. Speaker, the Fed-er'al Election Commission Act amend-ments conference report has today beenvoted on by this body. The first time wein the House voted on these amendment,,I cast a 'no" vote because I was opposedto certain aspects of the bill which I feltharmed our Federal election processrather than made it more accountable.However. I today cast an "aye" vote, be-cause certain changes in the conferencecommittee were made in thle bill whichmade it more acceptable and I feelstrongly that we must act on this legisla-tion to insure the orderly continuationof the electoral system presently in force.

These changes included deleting aHouse provison, which had required theFEC to submit all future advisory opin-ions to the Congress as regulations forcongressional approval as well as any ad-visory- opinions issued after October 15,1974. In addition, the conference reportdoes provide for more equal solicitationby corporate and union political actioncommit tees. Both groups-corporate andlabor-must report carefully all expendi-tures in communicating to their membersin regard to helping or defeating candi-dates.

I am not fully satisfied with this leg-islation; but It has been changed suf-ficiently in the House-Senate conferenceto cause me to vote "aye."

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield2 minutes to the disting-uished minorityleader, the gentleman from Arizona (Mr.RHODES).

(Mr'. RHODES asked and was rivenpermission to revise and extend his re-marks. '

Mr. RHODES. Mr. Speaker, I recentlyreceived a statement from the President,as follows: "Thle President as previouslystated favors a simple reconstitution ofthe Federal Election Commission consist-ent with the Supreme Court decision.However, the President will carefully re-view the congressional approach andmake a decision consistent with the or-derly and responsible conduct of the elec-tion process."

I think any fair interpretation of thisstatement is that the President has notmade up his mind whether he would signthis bill or whether he would not.

I would like to state, however, that thereason we are here is that the SupremeCourt found that parts of the act of 1974were unconstitutional; mainly, the partdealing with the way the Federal Elec-tion Commission was put together. Itseems to me, and I expressed myself inthlis manner at that time, "hat it wouldhave been much wiser on the part of the1-Touse and of the Senate to reconstitutethe Commission as the Supreme Courtrequired and not to go Into the nuts andbolts of the election law during an elec-tion year. It seems to me there is muchto be gained by having some Idea justwhat sort of law we operate under in thiselection. It seems to me we should notchange the rules as we cross the stream.It does not serve any good purpose,

I recognize that this bill has as one ofIts main thrusts the idea of trying to doa,'vNaY with the SUNPAC decision of theFEC.

H 3783I can understand why some of the

gentlemen on my right would want to dothat, because It does guarantee the rightof free speech for a corporation andallows the corpoxration actually to ask ItVown eml)loyees., to contribute funds forpolitical purpoaes. Personally, I do not seeanything bad about free speech. Whenthe first amendment is brought up inother contexts, I think most people. bot hon my right and on my left, support theapplication of it liberally so that all peo-ple can let other people know how theyfeel on matters like this.

The SPEAKE R pro tempore (Mr.McFALT). The time of the- gentlemanf rom Arizona has expired.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield1 additional nitnute to the distinguishedminority leader.

Mr. RHODES. I ask the question, whywould not the board of directors andmanagement of a co-.rporation be underthle same types of rules and have thesame privilege of communication itsother people?

I congratulate the committee on this-the committee has tried to take awaysome of the unfair tilt of the 1974 lawvtoward organized labor, Nevertheless thetilt, if this bill becomes lawv, would stillbe very strongly pro-union and anti-business, and it will be very stronglypro-Democratic and very strongly pro-incumbent. Therefore, I find myself uni-able to support this bill.

Again, I congratulate the Membl.erswho worked on this. They worked hard,they worked long, and I think they cameup with a bill which is much better thanthe one we started out with, but evenso the tilt is still there, the bias is stillthere, and I cannot support It.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2minutes to the gentleman from NewYork (Mr. PEYSER).

(Mr. PEYSER asked and was givenperiision to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. PEYSER. Mr. Speaker, while Isupport and now will vote for this bill, Imust say that I take very strong excep-tion to one section of the bill, and I donot quite understand how it even workedits way into the program at all. This dealswith the section on page 18 which saysthat the Senate committee, the Senatecampaign committees will be ii'lthdbizid,

-Slyown xpeienc inthis area indealing with my own party, the Republi-can National Senate Committee, clearlyshows that these committees operate ar-bitrarily, disc ririn atorily and, In cases,deceptively. These funds are used strictlyto protect Incumbents. In reality, theyare the antithesis of campaign reform,and I am very surprised the conferees al!-lowed this to become part of the bill. ItFeems to me that we should be protectingthe public agpinst what we know to bethe misuse of f unds.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, willthe gentleman yield?

Mr. PEYSER. I yield to the gentlemanfrom Ohio.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. I assume the gen-tleman is saying all these things, thesebad thingtq, about the Republican Sena-torial Campaign Commnittee, and not

10S3

1[3784 *CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOSE.about the Democratic commuittee. I donot know what they do or how they do it.but the Democratic committee does noto.perate that way.

Mr. FIFTYSEP. I say to the chairman, Ihave stated It very plainly about who Iani speaking right now. I cannot saywhat tile I emocratic committee does.but I Was4 going to ask the chairman aquestion1 AS to the reason why this -;cc-tion (h) onl Page 18 ever became part ofthis act, because I do not think It refersto anything we have discussed in theIlousc.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Well, it refers tothe fact that we have placed a prohibi-tioni of $5,000 onl these committees, andthe Senate simply would not buy it.Under the rules of comnity, in order to getit bill, I had to let them more or less setthe limits on their campaign committee.but onl the House committees we re-t~ad( the original $5,000. 1 would havebeeni a lot happier it we retained It all upand down the line.

Mr PYSER. I thank the gentleman.Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield

1 minute to the gentlewoman from NewJese (Mrs. FENWI-CK).

(Mrs. FENWICI( asked! and was givenpormnission. to revise and extend her re-marks.)

Mrs. FENWICK. Mr. Speaker, I thankmly colleague for yielding to mne. I thinknll of us who care very much about elec-tion. reform were bitterly disappointedwith the House bill when it left theDouse, particularly as it limited dis-('loslre. I voted against It, but I am nowpersuaded that this bill, although stillimiperfect, deserves support.

Tihe gentleman from Iadiana, who wasin the well earlier, said very clearly thatwo must have clean elections; arid, in-do'ed, we must. We are not going to getthemi if we continue to clip the wings ofthe F7ederal Election Commission, If wecontinue to restrict its powers. Butncither will we help reform without aCommission.

74r. Speaker, there are several clausesIn thi3 bill which has comne from thec.onference with which I do not agree.But I do not think we can stand here,crying for election reform, urging elec-tVon reform, and voting against everybill that comes down the pike with atleast sonmc election reform in it.

This bill at least re-establishes theComission; It contains some electionreformi, and I, therefore, intend to re-verse my previous vote and support It.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield5 !ninut-ei to the gentleman from Michi-g an (Mr. VANDER JAC;T).

(Mr. VANDER. JAGT asked and wasgiven permission to revise and extend hisremnarks.)

Mr. VANDER JAGT. Mr. Speaker, If Icould have the attention of the distin-gui:3 iied chairman, the gentleman fromOhio (Mr. HAYS), I take this time inorder to clarify somec of the language inthis bill as it relates to contrihution liini-ta tions.

I believe the language is clear, but be-cause It is a long- and complex bill I Justwvant the legislatLive intent to be crystalclear for any future interpreters.

The present law allows an individualto give all or any part of his annual $25,-

000 limit Wo a multicandidate cormIttee.This bill changes this In the followingWay:

If an individual wishes to contributeWo a multicandidate committee, such asa corporate or union political actioncommittee, hie may give up to $5,000 t-oeax~i such committee. However, his ag-gregate contribution stiU may not exceedhis $25,000 annual limit. An individualmay use his entire annual limit by con-tributi ng to tl e cornmi ttees establishedor maintained by a national politicalparty, but no more than $20,000 may begiven to any one such committee.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, if thegentleman will yield, that is correct. Nomore than S20,000 to any one.

Mr. VANIDER JAGT. An individualunder both present law and this bill maynot contribute more than $1,000 per can-didate per election.

Unlike individuals, qualified multi-candidate committees under present law(d0 not have an annual $25,000 limit. Thisremains the ca-se in S. 3065. Likewise,such a committee may not contributemore than $5,000 per election to any onecandidate or to committees which oper-ate exclusively on behalf of that candi-date.

So there is no change there.S. 3065 does make a substantial change

inl the amounts which rnulticandidatecommittees may transfer to other multi-candidate coliiiittees. As I read the billthe restrictions would be L-, follows:

A multicandidate committee maytransfer to any other multicandidatecomittee $5,000 per year. However, ifthe recipient of this transfer is a com-mittee established and maintained by anational p~olitical party, theni the limitwould be $15.000 per year. Any numberof these transfers to various party com-mittees may be made by the same multi-candidate committee.

Is that correct?Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is correct.Mr. VANDER JAGT. I thank the gen-

ticeman.Finally, on this section, if all commit-

tees which are involved in the transferare national, State, district, or local com-mittees-including any subordinate com-mittee thereof--of the same politicalparty, then none of the limitations apply.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is correct.Mr. VANDER JAGT. I note with great

Interest that the conference report statesthat the term "political committee es-tablished and maintained by a nationalpolitical party" includes the Senate andHouse campaign committees. Since I amthe chairman of the National RepublicanCongressional Committee, and since thegentleman from Ohio is the chairman ofthe Democratic National CongressionalCommittee, I wish the RECORD to clearlyindicate that, although our respectivecommittes are categorized as "establishedand maintained by a national politicalparty" for purpos.ses of sections 320(a)(1) B) and 320(a) (2. (B), that is notnecessarily the fact of the miatter, ex-cept for the purpos es of those two sec-tions and those two sections alone. Forall other purposes, our committees arecreations of thle representatives of thetwo political parties which have beenelected to the House. Speaking for my

M1ay 3, 1976committee. r can state unequivocally thatthe Republican Congressional Committeeis not maintained by, nor is it in any waySubordinate to the Republican NationalCommittee.

However, it Is clearly the conferees'intent that the House and Senate Cam-Paign Committeez are each entitled toreceive up to $20,000 from an individualand up to $15,000 from any multicandi-date committees.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, I willsay to the gentleman that I agree withhim. No matter how these committeesare created, for the purposes of tine lawvthey are considered to be created thatway and, therefore, they come underbroader restrictions than ainy restric-tions; they might othierwise come tuider.

Mr. VANDER JAUT. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentlemann.

1"or the purposes- of section 320(a) (1)(B) and section 320m)(2)(B) that Icited, our commlittees are considered tobe created in that way but they are notconsidered to be created in that way in-der any other sections?

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. The gentleman Iscorrect.

Mr. VANDER JAGT. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentleman very much.

Mr. HAYS of Ohiio. Mr. Speaker, I yield1 minute to the gentleman from Iowa(Mr. B3EDELL).

Mr. BIEDELL. Mr. Speaker, as thechairman of the cominitte knows, I havebeen working to try to get legislation,which would 15rohibit Political candidlatesfrom convertingr political contributions topersonal use. Such a provision was con-tained in the Senate bill, but it was de-leted in conference because Of Objectionsby the House committee.

I would like to know whether the genl-tlemian generally supports the conceptthat we should not let political candi-dates convert political contributions topersonal use.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, if thegentleman will yield, I think that gen-eral concept would be supported by theHouse. There were real problems in work-ing out the details in conference, espe-cially in cases where a Member was re-tiring and had a fund which he accumu-lated. The fund may have been accumu-lated about 2 years ago, and the questionwas: What do you do with it? It might bethought almost imnpossible to prorate itback to the individual contributoors, espe-cially since some of them have no rec-ords as to whether they contributed, forinstance, another $10. and pending fur-ther study, we just could not come UPwith an acceptable provision.

I do not fault thle general Idea, and Ithink that somec day we will be able towork something out in this area.

Mr. BEDELL. The gentleman believes;the idea has merit if we couldl get aproper provision drafted?

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is right.'Mr. BEDELL. Mr. Spea-ker, I thak ',he

gentleman.M r. HAYS of Ohio. mr. Speaker, I yield

1 minute to the gentleman from WiISCOn -

sin (Mr. OBEY).Mr. OBEY. Mr Speaker as some

Members know. I have not been espe-cially happy with the section of this bill

1(084

.1[(! .1, 1976

provides that records ne(ed onily be keptas to the identity Of contribtutors In ex-cesS Of $S50.

The conifer-ence suiilt te combinesmlanly of the enforccnlel)t provisionls conl-tained in both ile Semnile bill and theIhouse anieninent, givion, the FederalElec tion Comision e~x;Iaided and morevariedc~ civil enforcemnt powers. Asthese are described inl (itail in the coil-

ference report I will not dliscuss them aitthis time. However, I would welcome anyquestions my colleaguecs might have wvithrespect to these enforcemenrt provisions.

The confelees ogreed to a modificationlof the advis-ory opinion iprcedtlures of the

Commision. Ani advisory Oi)iili maybe requested by aniy Federal offlceliolder,tiny candidlate for Federal office, anlypolitical connutten-. or the national com-mittee of any political party, concerningythle appl icatin of a general rle1 Of la'wstated in the nit, or the applicat ion of a

general rule of law p-rescribed by theCommission :is a rtule or regulation, to a

specific factual'l situa.tion., Section 11)8i a

of thle coilifurt nWce bill lpruhlibits thec Coin -

~Iq.ision from propOsing- general rule ofla w in any formn other th'in as a rule orregulation pur:iiS lit to the congressional

aview procedlvies of the act. Generalrulelnakilg waw; never intended to be the

,s~lnctiol (if the advisork, opinion prloces.'this sectionl clariflecs thle intent of theCongress in this resvect, and requires the

"Vomnl~sioli to Conform their prior ad-_visory opiniolis to these provisionls Mvitlu-.4i 90 days of enactment.

The conference Nil prohibits opinlionsof an advi.-ory nature other thain pUr-

-91SilO lt to the Ik d iSOr-; opiniol procedtir'e.TYhe bill als o expands those who would

re able to rely upon an advisory opinionto incluite any person involved iin any

syecific tranisaction or activity which isEniistinlguislable in all its material as-pects fromn the tranlsaction or activityith reopect to w.hich the advisory opin-

'f01l is issued.Thie coinferece~c substitute amrends the

rbrocedure for congressional review ofComimissionl rules and regilations by

larifying that Congress may disap-'rove any provision or series of inter-related provisions which state a singleseparable rule of law. Thle proposal inthe Senate bill shortening the reviewtime was deleted by the conferees, thusretaining- the 30-legislative-day periodof existing law.

With resp~ect to limitations on coil-tributions, the conference stubstitute ISa fair compromise between the Senatebill and the House amendment. A person,as defined in the act, will be subject tothe existing- limitation of $1,000 per elec-tion per Federal candidate, As underpresenlt law, earmarked contributionsand contributions made to a candidate'authorized political commnittees are con-sidered to he contributions to that candi-date. A person may also not make con-tributions to any political cornmittefestablished Find inaintaineti by a na-tional political party which In the ag-gregate exceed $20,000 in a calendaiyear. A person is furthier prohibited f rournia'ring contributions to any other politi.cal commlittee which in the aggregat(exceed $5,000 In a calendar year. Indi.

S 63165CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATE

viduals WoUld still be subject to the $25,-00 o gegt limitation on all contribu-tionls in a% calendar year in existing law.

A multicandidate political committee,ais defined in the act, may contribute atotal of S5,000 to a Federal candidateand his authorized political commnitteein any election camipaign. A mtdticandi-date political committee would be lim-ited to an apizregate of $15,000 in a calen-dar -year whidch it could give to any POl it-ical comimittee of a national politicalp)arty and to an aggregate of $5,000 In aca lendatr year it could give to any otherpolitical commaittee. These latter limita-tions. however, would not apply to trans-fers bttween p~olitical committees of thesaime palit ical pamrty.

lican or Dmcai eitra ~j.

ifiit1tee of_ Iltili 11 m 1ae acI~j21.ibSltl 09000Q - to a cal(,, C4(q

tl~~.smlte n aalenor yarwas

1-111e othecr provision., of the Senate billand the Ilotitse amendment relating tolim ita twis onl contributions and certainexpenditures were similar and are re-flected *int the conference substitute.

The conference substitute also con-tains at fair compromlise between the Seln-ate bill and the House amendment per-taining to the solicitation by corpora-tio-ns atnd labor organizations of voluin-ary coI ntributions to sepairate segregated

f unds. It f ollows the Structure of the Senl-ate bill. permnitting corporations to solicitvoluntary contributions from stockhold-er's aind executive or admuinistrative per-sonlnel, and labor or.ganizations to solicittheir members. The conference bill wouldclarify the definition of executive or ad-minllstrative personnel to include ii-viduals employed by a corporation whoare paid on a salary, rather than hourly,basiFs and who have policymnaking, man-agerial, professional, or supervisory re-sionsibilities. In addition to the above,corp~orations and labor organizationswvould he able to solicit all employees andstockholders twice a year in writing bymail to their residences with the provisothat the solicitation be designied so thatthe party making the solicitation cannotdetermine who makes a contribution of$50 or less its a result of such solicitationand who does not make such a contribu-tion.

The conference bill adopted the HouseProvisions giving trade associationsri-lhts to solicit stockhiolders and execu-tive or administrative Personnel of mem-ber corporation-s.

Th'le conference report, at page 03,states as follows:

Thie conference substitute follows theHouse Famendment with regard to the solici-tation by a tradie association of stockholdersand, executive or adnilnistrative personnel

*(and their families) of a member corporationof such trade as;sociatioli. The conferencesubstitute contains the provision of the Sen-ate b.,11 permitting a membership organiza-tion, cooperative, or corporation without cup-ital stock, or a separate segregated fundestablishedi by such orgail~itions, to solicitcontrlbulions to such a fund from membersof ,iuch orgflni7.ation. co()pcrlitive. or cor-pora-

tisil without ('Spitid stock. In alght of the factsubsection (b) (4) (D) governs solicitations

:)' at trade Iu..ociation of thel-tockholdersund~ executive (or ad(iiitrtiVe personnel of

It memnber orpanization, then the term ~I'ni-to3ership organizAttion' in mubsection. (b) (4)(C) is not Intended to include R trade asso-ciation which L-s made up of corporations.

A cillestiOii has comec UP as% to the pur-pose of the phrase "the term 'member-ship organization' in subsection (b) (4)(C) is not intended to include a trade as-sociation which is made up of corpora-Lionls."

First of all, this language was includedto preclude a trade association, which isalso a membership organization,' andwinch desires- to solicit thle stockholdersanld emiployee4 of a member corpuration.from avoiding the limitations of 321(tb)(4) D1)), which limit such solicitation tostockholders and executive or adininis-trative personnel of the member corpo-ration, and further provides that themember corporation must consent tosuch solicitation and only give its conl-sent to one trade association in a calen-dar year.

Second, it applies only to trade asso-ciations with corporate members and isintended to reguilate the solicitation ofthe stockholders and executive or ad-ministrative personnel of such corporatemembers. A trade aSsociation which is amembership organization may, ofcourse, solicit its other members, such asindividuals, partnerships, et cetera under321 b) (4) (C).

In most other respects the provisionsof the Senate bill related to corporateand labor union political action commit-tees were ratained. except the definitionof stockholder, which was omitted. leav-ing the interpretation of this termi togeneral corporate lawv.

The conference bill contains linilta-tions onl honorariuims, increasing the ex-isting limit per speech from $1,000 to$2,000 and the yearly aggregate f ronm$15,000 to $25,000. In addition, actualtravel and subsistence expenses for therecipient of the honorariums and spouseor aide as well as amounts paid or in-curred for Rny agent's fees or commis-sions are explicitly excluded from thehonorariumi limitations.

Finally, the conference bill includesthe provisions of both the Senate billand the House amendment pertainingto the termination of matching fundsfor inactive Presidential primary cam-paigns and the return of excess publicfunds not used to defray qualified cam-paign expenses.

In conclusion, this legislation correctsmany of the defects, inequities, and in-consistencies in the campaign flinancelawvs which the Congress and others haveobserved since passage of the 19,74amendments. It clearly reflects theoriginal intent of the Congress in 1971and 1974, and at the same time, restruc-tures the campaign finance laws, bothto give the Federal Election Cominis-sion more extensive and flexible civilenforcement and regulatory powers, aswell as to provide for a mere balancedand equitable operation of these laws.

Mr. President. as this legislation hasbeen externsively debated in tV-oth Hou.5esof the Conigres-s, it is now of critical im-portance that the Senate act expedi-

1 09 1

I ~d

IL

'p

I>I,if

1 Mr.~c~re~i.Agi, 9 a im soc-dnq t fsor t11 j~r~ i

Xi72 U i 5 I CV~ t r (I U] f I 171I tt ft i 0is c j 1 s

4 Chairman CAnlnon. We can strike the woz'-d "o-,ho1 ri

r I~r. r~dmas. Ta Ciwht I am 0aig otherwj zc_ it s

S re~durcnt.

7 Chairman Cannon. The -,;econd par*ag1rac-ph beyonac tJ.,),at is n;

Stairting with: "It is thec conf erees' inten rt. Tha.t wsls

9 to define -the--, intent of the calendar year,, th-is bein aEl~

yenr

Is there objection to those three exp~lana tions? WIq thout0

12, ojctLin oil the parL of the -Sencatle, the--y are agred.

13 Pr)age 49 there has been a substjtlitc p-.roposed,

Ca14 Mr.99iggins. Is it Your understau-dincj that the $17.,500which c.an lbv contributecl to Senatorial carid-dates is tht on

a. per election basis or per candidate basis in a calnda~-r yearC.- 16

Ch a irma n'.C a )n on. Per ccalendar yea-r.17 1':r. Wictgins. All1 right.

Chairma-n Cannon. LecauE-e vve arrived at that by aLw19

the $5,000 per electhion to sturt with.20Mr. Wiggins. TloVard, --I Carntheacpobby

21questions more germane to0 the SeCna1te, but they ought tCo be

22 cleared up. But the ricgh1t to give $17,500 is per aenr

24

limit thec rigj-Lt of othe~r naLI.onal cornlnittcoes to (Jive 1$5, 000?25 .

3

7

- 8,

9

10

N 12

13

o 14

15

16

N 17

18

19

20

21.

22

23

25

Mr. Wign.Per elc-tionj.

Chairman Ccinnon. Per election. Onl11Y a)PpLies to th(:e

specifiedcmite under thle sta-tutc.

Mr. wiggins. If the SenatLors are clear that th-e re

amnbiguity then I don't- have, an-1,y prolm.

Chairman Cannon. W-fe are satisfied.

Mr. Wiggins. All righl-t.

SenatorQ)- Scott:. You said tLhe $31,500 is prelection

no0

t oo?

Chairman Cannon. No. Per calendar.yea.

Senator. ]--ell. Mr. Chairi-nan, does this mnean per e 1.e c Li4.on,

or I mnean per candidate per year? What i~f there is a caucuG

or prim-tary electUion?

ChiranCannon. W-hich one are you tal.king about?

Senator Pell. Expenditure, the $1-.,500'.

Chairman Cannon. No,, it says por- year, per calendar

year in which tjie election is held is whaL: it says in the

s-CLa L:u Lc .

Se n ator P eii1. I f the or C-- are tw )o U. ci o.; is i would(1 tillI

I.- li.mid.ted?

- s ha atotaJ. ro yror i ".i Lil. &o

C1 CLoio 01F-or tha othur cm,1ritee -(,?

Chajmzi~i annn. t 1-10rit -IffecL the Yicjht; Of Othcr

c~lrfu~toosto e ale t gie whtevr w hav p~ov~idcc unc-r

fh la.

C) 4, :37d7tI Ch~tirm~nC 411n. StllJ liimitedt ht iuc

(--'IbD Y 1),c~ dt aprJop-osal hero for thjs rc~Writo of the

con ic~ence eport on pacje 49 and 50 star.Ling at te ottm-

1)Dc~ eveTrybody havo a copy of that look1,ing at it?

5Mr. 1Sho1-cnlr. T1'hcre aire soveral differont ones.

6Chairman IIa ys. Will you cfistribute the documents?

7Chairm I n Cannon. The coniference substitute that IT had

here was Oo that I understand was worked, out by the staff

of he ou -ad the Senate, is that corect? On the

S Majority side. The other subs titute was worked o ut b y st a ffson the Minority side. Suppose we go through th Mjoit

11

12 staff substitute and take a look at it and then we will procc~d.

to discus's the Minorit.13

Does ever--lbody ha-ve the copy now so they can read it?)14

Mr. DentL. Look at the top of page 3, membershiip

organizations, it does not include or was intendedl to incJlucV

a t.-rade association. Most trade associations are mi~ade up of17coporations. That is what they are doing,/srpee~n

181

corp orations iwith-in that particuk~lar trade's activities.19

Chairmlan ilfays. Where is thatL?20

Mr. flathis;. :1 don' t think so.21

Mr. Dent. it's Your amnmn.If you think it's all22rijh L, it' s okj.ay with me.

23Chairmian IHaySc. It s;ay" ti't intmnndcd to includce,

241whlich ., .; wh aL ho w:anLedl to do, Oxci. ado it.

25

BEFORE TIHE FED)ERA~L ELECTICNttU~~1SSICN

In the Matter of)) NUR 820 (78)

National Republican Senatorial)Cauittee

CERTIFICATION

I. Marjorie W. Emmons, Secretary to the Federal Election Ccsruission,

certify that on June 12, 1979, the Cctmission, mieeting in an executive

session at which a quorum was present, failed by a vote of 3-2 to pass

a mo.tion to amend Reccamrndation 3 of the General Counsel 's June 6, 1979,

report in MUR 820 (78) to read as follows:

3. Find reason to believe that the National RepublicanSenatorial Comittee and the Republican NationalCammLittee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(h) bymaking contributions to Jams Martin of Alabamduring calendar year 1978 in exess of the linitationsof that provision of the Act.

Comissioners Harris, McGarry, and Tiernan voted affirmatively for the

motion. Cczrrissioners Aikens and Friedersdorf dissented. CCSmissioner Thimsron

was not present at the time of the vote.

Attest:

1.~~l ______z__________

Date (IMroie W. Emmonscretryto the Commission

0 4

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION125 K S IRN1 IN.W.

WvA SHIN( IOND,(- 06

MRANDUM M1:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJICI':

GILaRLES ST=~L

M4ARJOPEE W. E01VNS

JUNE 11, 1979

AMENDED AGENDA\ FOR THE E)XCUIVE SESSION~OF TUESDA1Y, JUNE 12, '1979.

After consultation with Chairman Tiernan and Staff Director

Potter, it was agreed to add two "objected to" ?4JFS to the agenda

for TLESDAY, JUNE 12 in the hope that it might not be necessary

to hold an executive session on Wednesday, June 13, 1979. (of

course, that would depend on how many additional iteis now in

circulation were "objected to" by noon on Tuesday. If there were

only a few, possibly they could be considered on Thursday.)

The twro MUPS objected to were:

1) MU1R 820

2) MUPS 398-218,328, 368.

We hope you find this agreeable.

CC: Chairman TiernanStaff Director Potter

June 8. 1979

MLMORANDUM TO: Marge Emmons


SUB~JECT: MUR 320

Please have the attached General Counsel's Repott

on MUR 820 distributed to the Commission on a 48 hour

tally basis.

Thank you.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

1JLUN8 AllI

In the Matter of)) MUR 820 (78)



on December 13, 1978, the Commission found reason to


(NRSC) may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) by making ex-

penditures in connection with the Senatorial Campaign of

James Martin of Alabama in excess of the S 441a(d) limita-

tions published by the Commission. The Commission's

published calculations for party spending limits for Senatorial

contests limit the national and state committees of the

Republican Party to spending no more than $62,506.94 each on

behalf of a Republican candidate for Senate in the state of

Alabama. If the National Republican Senatorial Committee

acted as the authorized agent of both the National Republican

Committee and the Alabama Republican Party, its total spending

limit on behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatorial campaign

was $125,013.88. NRSC reported a total of $196,355.85 in

§441a(d) expenditures on behalf of the Martin campaign.

In response to questions submitted by the Office of


-2-

1. Letters from the Republican NationalCommittee authorizing NRSC to make S 441a(d)expenditures in connection with theMartin campaign -


2. Agreements with the Alabama RepublicanExecutive Committee authorizing NRSC to makeS 441a(d) expenditures in connection withthe Martin campaign -


3. Affidavit of Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer, NRSC,in which Mr. Smith states that he supervisedand directed the expenditure of S 441a(d)funds in connection with the Martin campaignas authorized by the Republican NationalCommittee and by the Alabama Republican Ex-ecutive Committee. Mr. Smith further statedthat such expenditures were made "properly andin accordance with Commission Advisory opinion1978-19."1

As stated, NRSC reports disclose a total of $196,355.85 in

S 441a(d) expenditures in connection with the Martin campaign.



Sparkman Senate Seat (S1 and $122,985.30 to the Martin Cam-

paign for the Allen Senate Seat (S2) Mr. Martin was a can-





-3-


in connection with Sit as authorized by the Republican National


$123,000 in connection with S 2" as authorized.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

The Commission's Advisory Opinion 78-19 was in response

to a request made by the Fraser Senate Committee concerning

the application of FECA to transfers between principal campaign

committees for Candidate Fraser in his campaign for two

separate Senate races. The Commission noted that

[t~he Act specifically permits, and exemptsfrom contribution limits, the transfer of fundsfrom the principal campaign committee of acandidate seeking one Federal office to theprincipal campaign committee of the samecandidate who seeks another Federal office.2 U. S. C. S 441la (a) (5) (C) .





Advisory Opinions rendered by the Commission apply a


§ 437f(a). And any advisory opinion rendered by the Commission


(a) any person involved in the specific trans-action or activity with respect to which suchadvisory opinion is rendered; and (b) any per-son involved in any specific transaction oractivity...

2 U.S.C. S 437f(b)(2). See also 11 C.F.R. s 112.5.

-4-




committee for S 2' that being "indistinguishable in all its



Martin's S 1 and S 2 campaigns would seem to be materially dif-

ferent from transfers between two principal campaign com-

mittees.

The question then becomes whether, absent AO 78-19, as

precedent, NRSC could successfully interpret the language of

the statute, 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d), to impose limitations on

party coordinated expenditures in connection with general


connection with general election campaigns of specific


S 441a(d) spend up to $122,000, as authorized by RNC and AREC,

in connection with the Sparkman Senate seat and $123,000, as

authorized, in connection with the Allen Senate seat even

though James Martin was the Republican candidate supported by

NRSC in both races. Or was NRSC limited by S 441a(d) to spend-

ing no more than $122,000, as authorized, in connection with

James Martin's Senatorial campaign whether that be for the

Sparkman seat or the Allen seat.

0 0-5-


regard. Section 441a(d) imposes limitations on expenditures


candidate for Federal office." 2 U.s.c. S 441a(d). This



races or in connection with Federal candidates. The Coin-

mission's regulations do not assist in this matter. 11 C.F.R.

S110.8.


that the Commission take no further action in connection with

the National Republican Senatorial Committee's possible

violation of 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) since the statute is not

explicit on whether the expenditure limitations apply to

Federal candidates or to Federal Senate seats. The Commission

will want to consider this matter fully in drafting a new

Regulation prior to the 1980 elections. However, the Com-

mission' s decision to take no further action in this matter

should not be read as an adoption of NRSC's interpretation of

the statute.

However, it is clear that coordinated. party expenditures

under S 441a(d) are limited to expenditures "in connection


was held on September 5, 1978, with a Runoff on September 26,

1978. The Commission's (E) Index shows NRSC expending $3,000

-6-

in coordinated expenditures on July 19, 1978 and $25,000 in


journal entries show the July 19, 1978 amount of $3,000

charged to the National Party limit and the September 1, 1978

amount of $25,000 charged to the State Party limit. If these

expenditures were in connection with the Alabama primary or

runoff election rather than in connection with the general

election, they would not be allowable under 2 U.S.C. S44la(d).

In addition, since the only dated letters of authorization to

NRSC were a letter from the Republican National Committee dated


tive Committee dated August 22, 1978, the July 19, 1978 expendi-

ture would seem outside the scope of S 441a(d) as NRSC was not

the "designated agent" of the RNC at the time of the ex-

penditure.

Therefore, the Office of the General Counsel recommends that


violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by reporting expenditures made in con-

nection with the Alabama Senatorial primary, and made prior

to the time NRSC was the designated agent of RNC, as coordinated

expenditures under 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d), 11 C.F.R. S 110.7(a) (4).

NRSC also reports one coordinated expenditure of $50,000

made on October 2, 1978, the day that James Martin switched

his candidacy from the Sparkman seat to the Allen seat. NRSC's

-7-

journal entries allocate $28,458.63 of this amount to the

Allen Senate seat campaign and the balance to the Sparkman

Senate seat campaign. The Office of General Counsel recommends

that the Commission seek further details from NRSC concerning

this expenditure, e~., the purpose of the expenditure, the

method of determining the allocation of the expenditure toS

and S,2* Therefore, the Office of General Counsel recommends

that the Commission approve and send the attached letter and

interrogatories.

Finally, NRSC reports contributions pursuant to 2 U.S.C.

S 441a(h) to both the S 1 and S 2 Martin campaigns. NRSC ledger

sheets allocate S 441a(h) contributions in the amount of

$16,493.27 to candidate Martin in his race for the Sparkman

Senate seat (S1)and $17,300.00 as S 441a(h) contribution to

candidate Martin in his race for the Allen Senate seat ( )

A question has been raised as to the accuracy of interpreting

2 U.S.C. § 441a(h) to limiting Senatorial Campaign Committee

contributions to candidates for specific Senate seats. Does

S 441a(h) permit a $17,500 contribution by NRSC to candidate

Martin in his S 1 campaign and another $17,500 contribution by

NRSC to candidate Martin in his S 2campaign?

The provision reads:

(h) Notwithstanding any other provision ofthis Act, amounts totaling not more than $17,500may be contributed to a candidate for nominationfor election, or for election, to the UnitedStates Senate during the year in which an electionis held in which he is such a candidate, by the

-8-

Republican or Democratic Senatorial CampaignCommittee, or the national committee of apolitical party, or any combination of suchcommittees.

2 U.S.C. S 441a(h). The important limiting phrase here is

"to a candidate for ... election, to the United States Senate

during the year in which an election is held in which he is

such a candidate." The limiting phrase in S 441a(d) (3) reads

"in connection with the general election campaign of a candidate."

Thus, the question becomes whether the language of S 441a(h) or

its legislative history can be construed more clearly than that

of S 441a(d) (3) to apply either to contributions to individual

candidates for the Senate or to contributions to specific

senate races. The legislative history is helpful in this regard.

Section 441a(h) began as an amendment offered by Senator

Johnston during the senate floor debate of FECA's 1976

amendments. 122 Cong. Rec. S 3,805 (daily ed. March 18, 1976)

(Remarks of Senator Johnston). The provision as originally

introduced amended what became the $5,000 contribution

limitation of S 441a(2) (A) to add the following:

After "exceed $5,000." add "except that theRepublican or Democratic Senatorial CampaignCommittee, the Democratic National CongressionalCommittee, the National Republican CongressionalCommittee, or the national committee of apolitical party may contribute at any timeamounts not exceeding $20,000 to candidates forCongress with respect to any or all of theelections in which such candidates seek officeduring an election year."

-9-

Id. (Emphasis added). Senator Johnston explained his

amendment:

What it does is simply this: it increasesto $20,000 per year for elections tht t -committee may give to any candidate. Under thepresent law the committee, the Senatorial,Democratic or Republican, Committee may give$5,000 per election, election including theprimary, runof-,and general electiOrn, or$15,000 for candidates who have all threeelections.

What this amendment does is simply saythat that amount is increased to $2010O Oisnot made dependent upon whether they areprimari e, runoffs, or general elections.

Id. (Emphasis added). After some discussion, Senator Johnston

amended his amendmient to read:

At the appropriate place in the bill insertthe following: "Notwithstanding any other provisionof this Act the Republican or Democratic SenatorialCampaign Committee, the Democratic National Congres-sional Committee, the National Republican Congres-sional Committee, or the national committee of apolitical party may contribute at any time amountsnot exceeding $20,000 to candidates for Congresswith respect to any or all of the elections inwhich such candidates seek office during an elec-tion year."

Id. at S 3,806 (Emphasis added). The Senate voted 64-20 to

accept Senator Johnston's amendment as set out above. Id.

at S 3,808.

The Senate next discussed the Johnston amendment on

March 24, 1976 in the context of an amendment in the nature

of a substitute to S.3065 introduced by Senator Cannon.

Senator Cannon made the following statement in connection

with the substitute's effect on the Johnston amendment:

-10-

Second, the amendment to S.3065 proposed bySenator Johnston and previously adopted by theSenate is modified to clarify that contributionsby the specified party committees do not aggre-gate more than $20,000 in an election year.

122 Cong. Rec. S 4,150 (daily ed. March 24, 1976) (Remarks of

Senator Cannon) (Emphasis added). Final action on the amendment

in the Senate limited its effect to the Senate, Id. at S 4,158

(Remarks of Mr. Johnston) and decreased the limitation from

$20,000 to $17,500, Id. at S 6,365. The only discussion by

the House is contained at H 3,783 (Remarks of Rep. Peyser).

Finally, discussion in the House-Senate Conference on S.3065

also indicates that this provision was intended to limit

contributions by Senatorial campaign committees to candidates

"per calendar year". House-Senate Conferees, Conference

Report to accompany S.3065, Federal Election Campaign Act

Amendments of 1976 at 375-77 (April 7, 1976). Complete copies

of the above-referenced legislative history are attached.

Thus, it appears that there is sufficient legislative

history to support an interpretation of 2 U.S.C. S 441a(h)

which would limit NRSC in its contributions to a candidate to

$17,500 per calendar year regardless of the number of elections

in which the candidate ran and regardless of the number of

Senate seats for which the individual was a candidate.

Although Congressional debate did not specifically anticipate

that one individual would be a candidate in more than one

Senate race in one year, it is clear that the limitation was

meant to apply per year not per election. Thus, the rationale

of the Fraser AO which required that contributions transferred

from S, to S2 be allocated to the original contributors for

contribution limitation purposes would beinopposite here

where the limitation applies per year and not per election.

AO 1978-19. This analysis is consistent with AO 1978-64

which advised NRSC that the $17,500 limitation of 2 U.S.C.

S 441a(h) "relate to a particular candidate for the Senate

rather than a particular Senate seat."

Therefore, the office of General Counsel recommends

that the Commission find reason to believe that the National

Republican Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C.

S 441a(a) (h) by making contributions to James Martin during



RECOMMENDATIONS


Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) 's possible violation of

2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) in connection with the Senatorial campaign

of James Martin of Alabama.


Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by re-



designated agent of RNC, as coordinated expenditures under

2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) , 11 C.F.R. S 110.7(a) (4).

-12-


Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(h) by

making contributions to James Martin of Alabama during



4. Approve and send the attached letter and interrogatories.

4.

e79DATE I WILLIAWTC. OLDAKwR I

GENERAL COUN SEL7(

Attachments

1. NRSC Response2. Letter to Respondent and Interrogatories3. Legislative History

LAW OFFICES

MEPL R.JEN!NSJENKINS, -NYSTR~OM & STERLACCI, P.C.DENNLE . JNY~SO 2033 M STREET, N.W. OF COUNSEL

MICHAEL A. STCRLACCI WASHINGTON. D. C, 20036 JOHN 8. CONLANCARL F~. SCIFtR _ ___EDWAR~D A. RY~jiiR

JOSEPH E. .JAN-NETTAJAMES F. SCHOCNER (202?) 2 93.2 505MIHGNOFC-STEPHEN J. HITCHCOCK 'I599..ET MICHIGAN MFI~t-LR)ACHRIS W. PARFITT SOUTHFI9a ELD, MICHIGA M 40076~tGARY J3. 14YSTqOM aur10199(3)5928RONALD A. 0ENEWETH .aur 0 99(1?5922TIMOTHY J3. MULLINS

Kathleen Imig Perkins, Esq.Office of General CounselFederal Elec-tion Commission1325 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 204-63L

Re: M UR 820

Dear Ms. Perkins:

Enclosed you will find the affidavit of Mr. Rodney A. Smith, treasurerof the National Republican Senatorial Committee concerning expenditures andcontributions to the two Martin for Senate Committees. As is apparent fromthe last part of the affidavit, Mr. Martin resigned from his' candidacy forthe Senate seat of retiring, Senator John Sparkman (Class 2, United StatesSenate) in October 1978, and was tL.ureafter nominated to run for the seatleft vacant by the untimely death of Senator James Allen of Alabama (Class 3,United States Senate). A similar situation had previously occurred inMinnesota and Advisory Opinion 1978-13 to Congressman Fraser was studiouslyfollowqed to give direction for such a change in candidacy.

Tha affidavit should show our compliance with the requirements of thatAdvisory Opinion and I attach hereto copies of assignment and allocationagreements of the National and State Party committeesatoiigoratnas their agent in each of these campaign committees.

I will be glad to furnish any further information or documentationneeded to indicate our compliance in this matter,, and ask that before any-further action is taken that we be given an opportunity for a conference oransw-er further questions in wr-iting.

Respectfully, 1./

97, P41.,James F. Schooner

J~S: cal

Enc losure s

P.S. I also enclose a copy ol the review , by Stan Hluckc-aby, the C.P.A. ,Aho-fchecked the items rrantiorced ill the R-oi-nev Smithi affidavit.

'epublicanr

Committee

September 5, 1978

The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Rc ublic an Senatoria Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashincjton, D. C. 20002

Dear Bob:

B%, this letter the Republican National Commnittee authorizesth-e National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of- the Republican National Committee, for the- purposeof1 making excoenditures pursuant to 2 USC S44la (d) (3). 'Your

- Comitteeis authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfo.E the Re1--ublican National Committee, in connection wit,,.h the9cneral e lcion gampaign of James Martin of Alabama.

Under S421Xa (d) (3) youCommnittee's behalf, up

may spend, on the Republ.ican Nationalto $10,000 for Mr. Martin.

do-. .Best perso nal regards.

Very truly yours,

BILL BROCK

B B/b.".

cc: Bob *MooreBen Co ttenCh a.iie Bl1ack

*-Jaccuie Nyst rom1 Natt W'ircau

- Jay Bann ..

O htD. 5z-snhow-er R~ufCnCenter, Ito F*,-t IS4rort it-~t1'~,.- ~ ''- A'

....Republican

Commitnee

The Honorable Bob Packwood, Chairman*National Repu~blican Senatorial Committee

227 N~sacusets Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002'

De'ar Bob:

Bytislter the Republican National Connkitt4ee aut-horizestheNaional Republican Senatorial Committee to servea the

ageont of the Republican National Committee, for the purposeofL .akin-g exp enditCures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3).YuCcwi--ittee is' authorized to -,ake t-hese expendi ture s, on behalfof the Renubli1can National Cor m i -ttee, in connection with thegeneral e"Iection campaian of .Senate Seat .1, Alabamaan c. i s in addition to our letter of Sep". 5, 11"78, in thea:nount oz $10,r000 .

tJ'd e S 4 41"(d) (3-') you may.- sncend, on the. PReubli can*NationalC c t -e's behalf, an additional $52,000 f or Mr.

r _crti, brino-n the cutrnulative to-tal to S62,00

C7 st perS-onal regards.-

Very truly yours,

-* BILL BROCK'

cc: B- orB Bn Co04:te nCnarlie Black

JLy E a nn in g

D~yirr C'. js O e2'c C31r 1 1Q - r-- )C rn~~~

RepublicanNationalCommitteeBHi Brcck

Clhairrnan

T1- Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Recublican Senatorial Committee227 massachuse-tts Avenue, NEwashington, D. C. 20002

Dea-.r Bob:

Bthis letter the Reoublican National Committee authorizesthe Na-tional Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of-: the Republican National Committee, for the purposeOf orrakin7,,: ex-oenditures pursuant to 2 USC S44la(d) (3). Your

Ccm~tteeis authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof generali election campaign of Senat'-e Seat f.2.

U-' u-r SA41a(d) (3) you may s-ed on the Republican NationalCcm,-i tt-ee's behalf-, uD t%"o $60,000 for Mr. James 'Martin, of

-~Alab--ama

e- aSonal regards.

Very Lruly yours,

C" BILL EROCIK

Cc: Bob Mo reBen Cott=nCharlie BlackJ:accu ie Nystromn

-Jay BanningK e nr nKlince

Dv.ighl .0. Eiserv. er Rcoubii:an Center: 3."10 FirSlt Sllrcet rcAe~t W n'0 .C. t" CIO 2 .

~epublican

.jationaICommitteeBill arcc~k

Chairmann

*The Hionorale Bob Packw,-.ood, Chairman*National Rep ubli;can Senatorial Com-mit#-tee

227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEwashingt'-on, D. C. 20002

*De ar B63ob:

~y ~s 1eter the Republican National Com-mittee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Comrimittee to serve 'as theagent of the Republican National Corrmittee, for the puroose

.0:makng x~edi tures pursuant to 2 USC S44la(d) (3). YourCmiteis authori zed to make these exnenditL-ur-es, on behalf

o" he le --uli can Na tionl Co~mit tee , in connectiCon wit,-h theqeneral elecz-.or. can.;aicyn of Senate Seat #2.and is in addition to our lette h muto $60,000.

Undzer S-44dla d) (.3) you may spend-, on the Recublican NationalComttee 's bDehalf, an additional l..000 fJor r.1:llen, b hi7.ging the cuulative total to $61,000.

CN3nt ersona--l re--ara-s.

Very truly yours,

P. *BILL BROCK

Cc: Bob. I 10 ore* Ben CcteC ale Bl, :4ck

Jayr Dann-na* Ienny Klince

0.1.viohli : . -;,.-,hn, ic, a n C;-n i n r7, r n

.,publican.d,..ational

winiarn D. H.arrfs, Stah0 ChairmannMLembtbr to., AlaibamaP.C. Box 2 3156 i r i n o , ;m, A 12 ia332~(c05) 322 -5 7 23

AGREEI-ENT BETW7EENTIHE NIT:-o"AL RZEPUBLICAN SEENA"TCRIALU CO.:KMITTEtE

AND THE A.:%1MA REPUBrICA.N EXECUTIVE COIM!4ITTEE

The National Re:Dulican Senatorial Corn!ittee, hereinafter kniovn as "Senatorial", agreeswi th tha-e Alabama Re -ub i can Executi -ve Commnit tee , he re inaft-er -nc.w-n as "tae;as follows:II>-

1. Under the nrovisan of 44*1 a(d) (3) of Title 2 of the United States Code, Staite(land its stLIDordinate ccrmitteesi) may make certain expenitures in connectia*on-with tha ceneral election campaign of the cdiaefr the ofic. ne

State s Senator for the StZate of Alaba-ma.

2. Such amount of alowed exoenditures under said provisiLon has been corno:utedtenta-tively b)v the Federal Election Commission as the amount of Y C02,507.OO.

~ 3.Tha Stte ishe todesan-e Senat-ori'al its acent for the purpose of making.. s..ch "x,.n:tres up to the amount of $60,000.00.

4,S ;.-at e acr ee to fie an allc a t ion stat":e me-n t ccn c e rn in c " the am out n ot a ssic ne.to Satia a recuilred: by the Federal Election Conmi2_*ssio-n euainl.7)

5. -state acesto carr-y out Ithe pro-visicnis of suhalctio sttmn4adwl

C rmlya-d.;ise Sena tor-ial at any timre tha': S tate and its subordinata co-rmitteesraach '01 of the amount retained by State 'and a review., of tZhis acreement will

ocrat such time.

6. Senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf off candidate, or if it is%rMy ..n .r uab-le to mae such e:-oendture s, to promp.z tly, release and cancel

said aoenc: and reassign such allocated amount to StatLe.

This acrerem.:ent signed the date opp osite the respective parties' nam7e to be effetvwhen signed by both14 psartae.

National Repui_-I4can Senat,-orialComitc

Washno~n)_. C. Tte~-

Alabaiza R.epublican Exp=- ive Comitte

Ti tl e Ch a inan

.RepubliCanNationalcommitteeV~. i lirn D. H-ri S?, c ChidrmafMo~rTnt~er for Alab3maP.C. Box 32 15Bir~nifl~hzaf, Alatamna 35 205(.20C5) .32,2- 5 723

- .11/

-, I

6AGRE'{EN,,IT BE7, E'EN

TH-E NA"IONALI REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMYJ-11TTEE1

AIND T7V.- ALABAM1,A REPUBLICAN4 EKXECUfIVE CO"2IIT''-FE

Th11e Cet- Opl Fen'Thlican Senatorial Cjitehereinafter known as "Senatorial"',,a~-e

with theAlabamareablicafl Executive Commritee, hereinafter known as "State"; asflo:

1.UndC'r the provision cf 441 a (d) C3) of Tte2 of the Unitd St 1ates Code, S ta t

(an is sub ordinate co:%-nittees) may make certain expenditures in connecticn

J.th the special general election canipaign of the c an,:,ate for the office Uni- (

Sta-tes SenatCor for the State of Alabama unexD-ired term, Place #2.

2. such a7,,unt of allowed exoienditures under said nrovision has been comnuted

t,-entati4vely by,. the Federal Election Comm.ission as the amnount ofZ $62,507.00.

3. That State wishes to desionate Senatorial its acent for the purc':ose of raiv

suon OXnenditures up,- to the amou,-nt of $62,000.00

4. n- Stt=crees to file an allca7-tIon saentconcerning t'he amount not Zassicn-

to-ntral as re-u-Mrea- by the Federal Election Co,-m-.,;,-Lon Regulation 110.7(c)

5. Sta-t- ncv:rees to cryout the coviasions of" such allocation statement and ;l

~rntya-Vise Senatorial at any t, r-e that Sta--,te and its subordinatA-e comv2.ti2

reach 6 ~ o--: the amount retained by State and a review of thi.s agreem-ont will

occur at such time.

6. Seflator-al, acrees to make such exnenditures in behalf of candidate, or if itsis-

an'; manner u-nable to make such expenditures, to promptly release and cancel

said a-cincy and r eass:;.n such allocamted amiount to State.

Thisazrem~ntsicned the date orxoosit'e the respectivepate'amtobefciv

w:~e s~nedb'2 both carti-s.-

Date

T,' n2n D . C.

D ateu

10,7'0 at

1973 at

Niational Reciablican Sen-,orial Cm~ e

Title-ji

Al aham. a Re abli C -n 'E ~ etCC-

T tt1ee-C a - a-

CIJ)

Qla-.r 2YC. -0024

October 17, 1978

R od Sn ithNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Mfassachusetts Avenue, NEWashing-ton, DC 20002

- Dear Rod,

V) Pursuant to our conversation of last week, I am submitting the

fol"LC',jng- fig ures to the National Republican Senatorial Commrittee con-

cerning -your limitations on the J4.m Martin For Senate Comamittee.

. INis you know, Mr. Martin has changed candidacy for election to the

-Und rir- a,_Ies Sentate, and, therefore, under the law, is entering a new

1.0 ol-a-cticn. In accordance with Advisory Opinion 1978-190, we have made

an a-lloca'ion of the "coordinated ex-penditures" mads by the Nlational

Reo_1U'zdi4can Senatorial CommittLee between the first senrite race and the

cm ~ socond senante race. Of the $1 00,000.00 in coordinated expenditures that

ycu ha4"vc Ta:de , $70,170.55 has been allocated to the first senate campaig.n ,

zind $25,453.63 has been allocated to the second campaign. The remaining

ba-lanca of $1,370.821 is presently being refunided to you by the vendcr.

Using Ar".C. 1978-19, all of your contributions '($17,500.00 maximLum) made

to the first s enate campaign are non-allocable-to the second campaign.

Thekrcefore, that limit will begin again. I understand that you 'have made

subse._Cue:n: contributions to the second senate campaign, and those amou'rnts

shoCuld be added to the $1128,458.63 in determ.ining the total amount re-

maining for coordiniated exDenditures in the second senate campaign. A

detailed e-xplanation for this allocation has been telecopied to you

b-;th Jim Martin for Senate Campaign Committee.

* All allocations have been made based on the exact4. amounts of in-

7 vocs giv;en to us by vendors. Should any of these anounts have a slight

:raat~icn, we will immediately notify you' as to the ef-fects they have

on 'Your lim-itation.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questionsccnCnrn2.n this matter.

Sincerely,

Star. 1-uckaby

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BeFore the FEDER?.L ELECTION COM*I1,.ISSION

In the matter ofNATIO'0NAL REPUBLIC.ANi SENATORIAL COMMU ITTEE M.U.R. 820

AFFIDAVIT

Citv of Wiashington

District of.L Columbia

Rone A Smith, being duly swdorn deposes and says:

That he is the duly appointed treasurer of the NIational

Ropubl- .C-an Senatorial Committee of 227 Massachusett_-1-s Avenue, N.E.,.

W~;ingonD.C.

Thhctt as such' treasurer he supervised and di rected the making of

con trib.u tions as allowed by law to Republican candidates for the office

of United States Senate in the year 1978.

ThL-at, in such capacity -donations of cash (or in-kind) were riade20 to

Jame.-) Martin for- Senate (Sparkman seat) from July 11 through August 17t-h,

19-73 in teamount of $16, 493.27 as is shown in our internal recordls,

a co!py of hic is attached as Exvhibit A.

That in such capacity donation. of cash in the amount of $17,000

wc-re made to James MIartin for Senate ('llen seat) on October 6th an--;

a n in-kiLnd contribution of use of video eqLicment of $300.00 made o/bu

Octob-er 26'%th as is shown by our internal recor4s, a conpy of which is

attach-ed as Exhibit B.

V

That he is informed and believes that such cash expenditures are

allow..ed under the provisions of 2 U.S.C.-Section 441a(h).

VI

That in such capacity he supervised and directed the expenditure

of fundls in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkma.nn seat) , as

authorized by 2 U.S.C. 441la(d) and as assigned to the National

I-W~nu~lican Senatorial CommjittLee by Republican Nationa3 Commaittee.

'c-- e:acoDe_4i-ures in behalf of James MLartin for Senate- (SpDarkma-n se

Ssnown in th e a ttached E~xhibit C.

That_ in such carpacit-y he supervised and directed the expenudi"-ure' '

Cof funds in behalf of James Martin for Sena te (Allen seat) as authorized

by 2 U.S.C. 441a(d) and as assigned to the National Republican Senatorial

Ccrmttoby the Republican National Committee. Said expend-Jtures in

behalf of Jame-s Martin for Senate (Allen seat) are show n in the att-ched!

E ibit D. As show. n in said EXhibits C and D, a credit for funds or

mnb~~~teri ~ ~ ~ lcS linzcc fo ae artin for Senate (prmnsa)t

Ja=mes Martin for Senate (Allan seat) in the amount of $28,45S.63 Wi

maze o Octoer 2, 197".

VI II

That he is inIformed and believes that such agency agreements

areprobr nd orrct nd hatthe same were in accordance with

Coram11issicon Regulations # 110.7 and--' Advisory Opinion 1976-108.

I X

That he supervised anid directed the expenditures for James Iartin

for Senate (Sparkman seat) and James Martin for Senate (Allen seat)

ns were assigned by allocation agreements from the Alabama (State)

onpublican Executive Committee, such expenditures being shown on the

-Aforesaid Exhibits C and D.

NX

Tlhat he is infILormed and believes that all such transactions

ce pa~ roper',y and ini ac coracce wi th Comi=is s -on Advi sory 0.)i ri 0',

C-*' 73-19"Contribut---ions to Two Campaigns by On-- Candidate" mande in

connectZion with the Fraser for Senate Campaigns, and that the

mar-tin Camnpaigns are indiLstLinguishnable in all mat,-erial aspects fo

said Fraser situation.

That i--n order to makre sure t-hat all proper credits were madce

fbor c a sh or credits-.- transfer-red from the martin Comi=teCe (Sparka

t-ao t o the Martin Committee (Allen seat) , the National republic.An

Se:natoriLal Comit-tee required a certified public accountanrt t o M " -:?

~----. (W~

an on-si Ite review of credits of cash and in-kind contributions

t-ransferred from the first committee to the second.

XII

Further deponent, saith not.

Rodney A/)S ~hi t hTreasur~e, National RepublicanSenatorial Commrrittee

S-v:6rn to Lrd subscribed before me a notary public in and for theo-L,'-l-_'- this day of January 1979.

!Notary,Pubi~cmy ccr .,Lm, issi n ex ires

AO - , A

.7 Ii t1H l T 'A V ~ A~ 1

U_ -I 1 11 H.I 1 1111

9_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

/ /, I Iri

Z I el .le 7

_____~~~~ :e L 111 0IIl~'__

I~~~ ~ I I~I __

I ~ ~~ ~ H ________

II~~~~~ J III' ___

I T.

I I __________

27I1111

9 I; I _______ __I ~I Ii ________ ___

- *-*-- - . ~ ~ ___ _

__ __ 12 3 456

I&'C JI f Ltc! 5;C-cr- / t g________________________ ___________________T- ~d

____ ~ ~ U5 - cc ___I

II-7

LQ~z~.L~~?

~&Ii )hx~fV'&-~zz~Uv 1

I'IlII

11 H III

Ijp

II

I */P7 ~

~21iJ 'HI ii IliJ II ______I _________ _______________ ~ _______________

-) 11k<,I I I I

I I I 11~-i ,>s~

II I I I

'I,, ff'~

Ii* I I I iI

I I I c~I I I

LL~ I IIt iii

'-p--I.',

II

H ~-4- 4-4-4- I H H ~ _____-- t-- - 4--- 4

-i-Ih

JL~

if /c~

11 l1 H i 11 1 !

I I~~II'J''LIJ.I.IL j__ _I

II

li

S

NJo

__________________ ____ If I; ~ ' fi l __ N'

JJ~7 Zi illsI' - ~ 1 1

___________ __ Itjt t' i ;i'

___ ____ ____ _ t n __ __ ~ ____ _2)

________________ ___ III:1~ii~i II;I'21_ _4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N1 _ _ _ 122__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ii __________________________________________ _______________ _________________ ___ _________________ __________1__23

__L ______ -4i ____5

_____~ ~~~~~~~~~~ S~: i__ _I iF 7 F____ __ _

___ _________ ii~Ii lii iiIii t27_______ ______________________________ ii r N H I ';2 3

___________NHLT1 ii ii 'ii _ !!31I

_________________~~~~ ____ 4,iil _ _ _

-1~ ____ ___ __ -

I, ii II Si 1 ~jL

4,

____ 1! 1 ~. I _______ - ~ -.-.-.~i3~~~.

___ __ I .-39

---- 4 I L._ 1i~ -~

It I i I IIH- I I --

I " 1 -1 -,.1 1 i I

I i I I !

4t 5 - ---

I' I I II I _____ IT

12 1i TI II I I i

___I i__ it i~~ 1 ~

__7____] I ! 1,I Ii I ____i___ I__ IUI_

___________ Ii It I I I I ____ ____ _______

__ _ 1tt II I~ I I I

21L.4 7] _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

__ _ _ _ _ __L5_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ 1 1

2S______ tlt _

------------- T-l t it l l ;. i fh _ _

________~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I 1!_____________ __ __ il I __ __

29_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 1____ I li30f*~1___tl', __ I __

3-4 i Ilii IN_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

35f ___ __________ tL

39l'H K~ l __________

~I.

I.

LA AJ/Lr ~*-~-~ ~ ~ __________________

w

....... _ 1H.' 1 1 1 L...L.... ....~!~ J ,~l // 1.~ 1- I- __=__ 4

_____ I_ II~ I I 'l II I: it I -1

_________I]___I__1__1____111 Ii i 1111 w _

I I J.

L.:~:.:.L~- U I .1 I__ff)'?~~Mi~>~6f~li H/~ ~Q~jf[2 < "

___23__ /~i II 'iI-In _ _

24I I/~__ _ _

'. 1 57C I' It ~ V7Tl1LIJ I.

__ __ I_ __ __ __ _ L.......i HIf~1:j.ij ii'7f

A' 5 /r.22~-.I_ L.Kii LLI[HIIHM__II0t

____1__ Ji. I (KVST,.JI IL7 7 T ~ il

*1** _____________ _____ _______ _______ _____ j Il' .~ 1...Ii if

it* I

'I

itI; ii

____________________ I,. .: 1 _____ I _____

____________ ,~Itj~ '! ________ 'I...~' ~'..I 1 ________

3 4

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSIONIdhI~ H25 K SIR[EF N.WSI 4 ~ ~$WASHIN(, ION,D.)C. 20463


Mr. James F. SchoenerJenkins, Nystrom & Sterlacci, P.C.2033 M Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036

"T Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

The Commission is continuing its investigation inthe above-referenced matter. In this regard, theCommission, on . , 1979, found reason to believethat the National Republican Senatorial Committee

1: may violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 byreporting expenditures made inconnection with the Alabama Senatorialprimary, and one said expenditure madeprior to the time NRSC was thedesignated agent of RNC, as coordinatedexpenditures under 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d),11 C.F.R. S 110. 7(a) (4);

2: may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(h)by making contributions to James Martinof Alabama during calendar year 1978 inexcess of the limitations of thatprovision of the Act.

Attached is a set of interrogatories, answers towhich will assist the Commission in resolving thismatter. The interrogatories relate to the fact thatNRSC has reported two expenditures, one of $3,000 onJuly 19, 1978, and one of $25,000 on September 1, 1978,as S 441a(d) coordinated expenditures. The Alabamaprimary was held on September 5, 1978 and the date ofthe first letter of authorization from the RNC was

Mr. James F. SchoerierPage Two

September 5, 1978. In addition, the Commission is seekingfurther facts relating to the $50,000 expenditure madeon October 2, 1978, part of which was allocated to theSparkman Senate seat campaign and part to the Allen Senateseat campaign.

Under the Act, you have an oppotunity to demonstratethat no action should be taken against you. Please submitany factual or legal materials which you feel are relevantto the Commission' s analysis of these matters. Additionally,please answer the attached Interrogatories and return themto the Commission within ten (10) days of your receipt ofthis letter. The attorney assigned to this matter isKathleen Imig Perkins, (202)523-4175. Please contactMs. Perkifis if you have any questions concerning MUR 820.

Sincerely,


Enclosures

INTERROGATORIES -SCHOENER -MUR 820


July 19, 1978, reported as a S44la(d) coordinated







S44la(d) expenditures) as of July 19, 1978?


V) September 1, 1978, reported as a S44la(d) coordinated


C campaign of James Martin for U.S. Senate.




6. What method was utilized to allocate part of this expenditure


7. Were any media materials, developed using Sl NRSC coordinated

expenditures, utilized in the S2 campaign? If so, was an




MVarch 18, 1976 co:Several Senators addrpssed the Chair.Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, I send

an amendmen~lt to the desk.The VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk

will report.,111c nssistnt legislative clerk pro-

ceeded to read the amendment.Mr, GRIFFIN. Mr. President, I ask

Unanimous consent that further reading#if the aisnendmerit be dispensed with.

The VICE PRESIDENT. Without ob-jctiton. i t is so ordered.

Pursuanlt to an order entered laterin today's proceedings, Mr. GRIFFIN'Ssecond amendment in the nature of asubstitute is not printed in the RECORD.)

mr. GRIFFIN. I would like to explainthis amendment.

Mr. CANNON. Does the Senator havea copy, Mr. President?

r.GRIFFIN. We will get smXeroxed copies made for the chairmanand others.

I will tell the Senate this is anothersulmbtitute, and in this case the Packwoodamnendment, which is a very meritoriousamendnment, one of the most importantamendments that we have ever adoptedaround here, but realizing that it i3 con-troversial and we lose votes because it isIn the substitute, has been eliminated.Blut the Chiles amendment has been in-cii ideil.

Tlhis substitute includes the Chilesaimicdment, and it also carries theamendment of the Senator from Arizonawith regard to honoraria, and we wouldJust like to call the roll again.

Mr. TAFT. Mr. President, will the Sell-at4)r yield?

Mr. GRIFFIN. I yield.Mr. TAFT. I wonder If it also contains

thic amendment of the Senator f romiOhio?

Mr. GRIFFIN. I will have to admit itdoes not at this Point. Of course, it isanmnable.

Mr. Piesident, I suggest the absenceof it quiorum.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I wouldlike to see a copy of the amendment.

Mr. GRIFFIN. I suggest the absence ofa Quorum~.

The VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk willcall the roll.

The assistant legislative clerk proceed-edi to call the roll.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I asknanimlous consent that the order for the

Q(1U1171m call be rescinded.The VICE PRESIDENT. Without ob-

jection, it is so ordered.1Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I have

"I' amendment which I send to the desk.The VICE PRESIDENT. The clcrk will

btate the amendment.The a-ssistant legislative clerk proceed-

ed to read the amendment.Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I askUnanimous consent that further reading

Or thle amendment be dispensed with.Mvr. CLARK. I object.The VICE PRESIDENT. Objection is

hear&. The clerk will read the amend-mne nt.

The assistant legislative clerk read asf ollows:

Amendment to Line 23 of Page 27 of S3065,arnending Section 320 (a) (2) 'of the bill, as

NGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENAAftoer "exceed W5,0.0 add "except that th

Republican or Democratic Senatorial Cam-paign Committee, the Democratic NationalCongressional Committee, the National Re-publicani Congressional Committee, or thenational committee of a political party maycontribute at any time amounts not exceed-Ing $20,000 to candidates for Congress9 wt4re.spect to any or all of the lec.tioJ.ni.ghXix

such cami4 reyiQme during an elec-

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, thisamendment is submitted on behalf ofmyself, Senator BENTSEN, who is a formerchairman of our Democratic SenatorialCampaign Committee, as well as SenatorSTEVENS, the chairman of the Republi-can Senatorial Campaign Committee.

What it does is simply this: IUjX)-creases to $20,000 per year for..ele,.tionadidate'TUnder th'e'present law the com-mnttte'e, the Senatorial, Democratic or Re-publican, Committee may give $5,000 pe.eie qtioU, election including the primary,runoff, and general election, or $15,000for candidates who have all three elec-tions.

What this amendinept doeki.,sitp~ysayth h~~~is increasipd.t.$2P0,-0001 i-ofhrde djeendent -upon whether

'NMrC"Ptesident, the whole thrust, thewhole reason, for this campaign law isto do away, insofar as we can, with whatyou might call committed money-somecall it dirty money, money with strings,money wvhere there is some quid pro quo,express or implied, for the contribution.

So, Mr. President, thids atmendment in-creases the amount which you can getfrom the one source, that is, your Sena-torial Campaign Committees or your na-tional committees, for which there is noquid pro quo.

As a matter of fact, I daresay the av-erage Senator in this body does not evenknow where the contributions come tofor the Senatorial Campaign Commit-tees. In the case of the Democratic Com-mittee we do not pass around the list.Some Senators do not even secure con-tributions, but they all get contributionson a parity basis.

It seems to me, Mr. President, we oughtto make it as easy as possible withinreason to allow these contributions tobe made in reasonable amounts whenwe know they are not going to be basedon any semblance of any promise, ex-pressed or implied.

I hope the manager can go along withthis. It has bipartisan support. Frank-ly, Mr. Pr'esident, I see no conceivableobjection.

I ask for the adoption of this amend-men t.

Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, when thisbill was originally drawn 2 years ago we,of course, had a very extensive debatehere about whether or not all commit-tees ought to be limited to $5,000 orwhether we were going to create a spe-cial loophole a special situation, a spe-cial condition, for our own.

That is really wvhat the Issue here is.Are we going to say that labor commit-tees and business committees and so-called good government committees, andall other committees, are limited to $5,-

LTE 8 3805000, but when it comes to us that doesnot apply to the committees that con-tributes to us and to us only?

Ithose cases, if we are to adopt thisamendment, we would find ourselves giv-Ing ourselves $20,000.

Te absolute contribution lim~itation(onthe Democratic National Committee,the State committees, county commit-tees, every other committee, is $5,000. Ifwe adopt this amendment, we are sayingthat that would apply to all but our ownIn-house committees.

The great problem with this amend-ment is that because we wanted to keepthe party strong, we have said that anindividual may contribute to a partycommittee, the national committee, orthe Democratic or Republican senatorialcommittees and congressional commit-tees, not Just $5,000, but $25,000.

I think that is perhaps overly gener-ous, but It is in the bill and in the law.Any individual may contribute to thecongressional campaign committees andsenatorial campaign committees up to$25,000. If we are going to allow $20,000to go to a candidate, that means wereally open up and invite the possibilityof earmarking. At least, we make it ex-tremely difficult,. to enforce the lawagainst earmarking because then wehave a way to pass at least $20,000 outof an individual and into the hands of itHouse or Senate Member.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Will the Senatoryield at that point?

Mr. CLARK. I do yield.Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator Is

aware that there is a specific law whichprohibits the earmarking?

Mr. CLARK. Yes.Mr. JOHNSTON. If someone, express-

ly or by implication, earmarks, then it isthe duty of the committee to so note thatearmarking and it is the duty of thecandidate to report that as if it were adirect contribution from the originaldonor and the final donee, the Senatoris aware of that?

Mr. CLARK. Yes, that is why I wasvery careful in saying that it obviouslymakes it hard to enforce the earmark-ing law. The earmarking law Is the lawthe Senator Just described. Of course, Ifone can Identify someone who said, "Wewant this $20,000 to go to that candli-date,"~ it is against the law.

But we have to be very concerned inthe process of passing this legislationthat we do not invite difficulties In theenforcement of this law. I think thiswould do so.

Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator Is notsuggesting that the chairman or thecommittees of this Congress would beparty to circumventing that law, eitherexpressly or impliedly?

Mr. CLARK. No.Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator surely

is not doing that.Mr. CLARK. No. But obviously, not

every dollar that comes In to the cam-paign committee goes through the chair-man, is seen by him and passed onl byhim.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Oh, yes, It Is. I begto disagree.

The PRESIDING OFIjCER (Mr.GARN). If the Senator will yield. I ad-

457

I'll

S 3806 COUN

vise the Senator from Louisiana that hisamendment is not in order. Line 23 has n

lrady been deleted from the bill. p

Mr. JOHN~STON. Mr. President, I u

would, therefore, move to amend my a

amlendmflent by striking the words "after t.

ex(ced $5,000 add' and in lieu thereof

insert the follow ing "notwithstanding t

any other provision of this act". '1

I also want to strike "except that" and i

put the quotes in front of "the," So, a

ther'efor'e, it would read as follows: t

Notwithstanding any other provision of C

this Act 'the Republican or Democratic sell- n

atornal Calipaign Committee"~

Et cetera. c

Trhe PRESIDING OFFICER. The qlues-tionl remains, wheire does the Senatorwish the iamendmeltnt to comec inl thlebill?

Mi., JOHNSTON. At the alpropriate

p~lace.The PSEfSIDING OFFICER. The

amendmnitlt is so modified.

The amiendment, as modified, is as

follows-:At the appropriate place In the bill In-

sert the following: "Notwithstanding any

other provisionl of this Act the Republican

or Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comn-

inittee. the Democratic National Congresi-

sional Committee, the National Republican

Congressilonal Committee, or the niitlonal

committee of a political party may contrib-

lite at any time amounts not exceeding

S $20,000 to candidates for Congress with re-

LI ett il ral9.b clr Iom__xa__N__Ira__

r.JOHNSTON. As I was saying tothe Senator, if I recall the question. ear-miarking is totally impossible, and I amnsuire this applies with equal force tW theRepuiblican committee as it does withthe D~emocratic committee.

Not one cent goes out to a p~oliticalcandidate. I know this is true. It was truewhen Senator BENTSEN was chairman ofthe committee. It is tfiue \vheni I amchairmnl of the committee.

Not one cent goes out that is notsigned by the chairman, cosigned by the

> executive council and distributed undera plan generally perfected by the com-mittee.

Mr. CLARK. If I understand the Sen-ator's statement, every cent of moneythat, is taken into the committee is per-sona.lly received by him, and if there wereany conditions assigned to that, he wouldbe awar'e of It?

Mr. JOHNSTON. No. Every cent thatgoes out.

Mr'. CLARK. Thiat goes out?Mr. JOHNSTON. That is right.Mr. CLARK. But not that comes in?Mr. JOHNSTON. It is illegal to accept

tinder conditions'-unless they are ear'-miarked. and that is so stated.

Mr. CLARK. Right.Mr. JOHNSTON. it does not go out

without the chiairman 4ctually sipgningthe check.

Mr. CLARKM. I understand.Mr. JOHNSTON. So thrt it is impos-

sible for a staffer, for example, to receivesome money and understand the condi-tious and send it out of the committee.It comles through as it should, as it must,thirough the chairman.

3RESSIONAL RECORD - SENA

Mr. CLARK. Let me try to explainiore specifically with regard to thisoint that I do not think we ought to setp a diff erent standa rd for the senatoriallid congressional campaign committeeshanl we set tip for any othet committee.Par'ticularly, I do not think we ought

o set up a different level of contribution.'here w~as a good deal of debate here aittle while ago on the Chiles amendmentbout how much faith p~eople have lost inhie system, how people believe big moneyorrulpts and that special interestsioney cor'rup~ts.Now the senator'ial and congressional

:ampaign committees call receive moneyxactly the same way, and from theame kind of sour'ccs as ainy other com-nittee may.

There is no restriction whseire they canlake money.

I would argue that for tis then to cre-tte a special categoiry-every commit-ee in America can spend so much ex-ept one committee, our committee--it is

3rnly going to cause greater cynicism,ind justifiably so, from the Americanelectorate.

Mr. JOHNSTON. I say to my distin-guished friend that precisely the op-posite results, comne from this committee.

Suirely the Senator cannot compare aDemociratic committee or a Republicanc.ommittee to a labor committee or a busi-ness committee or any special interest.

Mr. CLARK. Why not?Mr. JOHNSTON. Because we have no

public interest, oilher than the partyinterest.

Mr. CLARK. The Senator is going totake contributions from labor for thecommittee, is hie not? it is exactly thesame dollar-fi'om business as well-whether for Republican or Democrat.

The Senator makes no restriction onlwhere that money comes from.

Mr. JOHNSTON. But it is comingledin a common pot and given out withoutstrings.

That is the key, and that is the reasonf or this amendment.

If we azsume a certain amount ofmoney is essential in a campaign, and Ithink that is a safe assumption, then ifwe cannot get it from the committeewe get it directly from the special in-terest group, and is this not much bettelthan getting it f romn the special interest'

Mr. CLARK. Is the Senator saylnithe campaign committees handle mone3that is somehow purified as compared Uthe Democratic National CommIttee 01

the Republican National Committee o:the State committees?

Mr. JOHNSTON. This amendment I.appllicable to the Republican NationaCommittee and the Democratic National Committee and, yes, that is precisely what I amn saying. It is purifie,because to the extent that there Is anexpress or implied strings on the mone3or the appearance of strings on thmoney, then those strings are cut bgoing through this committee.

Mr. CLARK. Maybe I mlsunderstoothe Senator's amendment.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Apparently, what?Mr. CLARK. There are no copies

the amendment available.

TEW M1arch 18, 1976Mr. JOHNSTON. I gave the Senator a

copy earlier. as a matter of fact.Mr. CLARK. It says:Except tnat the Republicani or Democratic

Senatorial Camlpaign Commi00t tee. the Demo-cratic National Coiigre.oilonikl Committee, theNational Republican Congressiuiial Commit-tee, or the national commiit tee of a politicalparty may contribute at sily tlime amountsnot exceeding $20,000 to calndidates for Con-gress with respeet to any or all of the elec-tions In which such candidates seek officeduring an election year."

What is being ,aid is that every coin-mittee in Amecrica is limited to $5,000,except the senatorial and congressionalcampaiwn 'omimittees and the nationalcommittees.

Mr, J01 INSTON. That, is precisely cor-ict.

Mr. CLARK. Mr. PI'esiclent, I wouldlike to say that what we are doing nowis saying to the Democratic NationalCommittee, "You cannot only give $5,000under the present law, you canl spend 2cents a voter for every voter in a State,with a minimum of $20,000, on behiilfof a candidate. So you can spend $5,000now lus $20,000 or 2 cents a voter,whichever is more. Now we are going tolift that limit of $5,000 all the way to$20,000.'

That means the Democratic NationalCommittee and the Republican NationalCommittee can now contribute a mini-mum of $40,000 to any candidate in Con-gress. Apparently, according to theamendment, it could not do that for thePresident. He would be restricted to$5,000. But Senators and Congressmenwould be allowed $20,000 ill direct cashand a minimum of $20,000 in expendi-tures on their behalf. That is now a$40,000 minimum limitation that can beeither given directly or spent onl theirbehalf.

Am I interpreting thle aillendment cor-rectly?

Mr. JOHiNSTON. 9iLs _amcn~,ftsimply__ha1gCr1=fl anl aggregate of$-M,000 to an agrgt-C 70;

tr~I6t es* Thiitie4. IT, does not change in any* 5 vlwiat he may get otherwise. Rigbt

now, as I understand the law, a candi-date may have expenditures made on his

*behalf by the national committee to theextent of $20,000 and he may have spenton his behalf by the Congressional Com-mittee $15,000, assuming he has a pri-inary, a runoff and a general election.All this changes is that $15,000 provision

r to a S20,000 provLsioni, and it takes overrthe requirement that there are three

elections. Inother wod h cS$20,000 even1 y ly6n, have a ener4i

election.- I would suggest to tile Senator we arenot changing it to allow the $40.000 butsimplyN changing it from the $15,000 to

ythe $20,000. If a candidate were so luckyrto get the full $40,000, and I submit that

e is going to be very rare indeed, what isywrong with that? Is it not better for him

to get that money, which I submit is pur-d ified, rather than get it directly from the

special interest group, directly from thelabor group or directly from the business

)f group?'Mr. CLARK. I must say that I do not

45 8

March 18, 1976 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE

share the Senator's view that somehowthe mioney that goes through the Sena-torial Campaign Committee or the Con-gressional Campaign Committee Is aspure as the driven snow, arid the moneythat comes from individuals who partic-ipate in labor is tainted or businessmoney is tainted.

Mr. JOHNSTON. It is not that it istainted. It is that they have a specialpoint of view and they give their moneyto promote candidates who share thatpoint of view.

Mr. CLARK. I assume if that were theonly criterion, the Democratic Commit-tee gives it to candidates that share theirview and the Republicans give It to can-didates that share their view.

Mr, JOHNSTON. No, that is not so, be-cause any member of the DemocraticCaucus, regardless of his view, even if attimes it strays from the majority, is en-titled to his share of the money.

Mr. CLARK. But it Is a Democraticview. They are not giving money to any-bodly but Democrats or they are not giv-

* Ing nioney to anybody but Republicans.Mr. JOHNSTON. That may be so, but

* that, I submit, is under our system ofgoverifment which, In effect, has en-shrined the two-party system. That isP~ermhissible and that is the kind of taint,if the party puts a taint on money, thatour system of government envisions andendorses and has run on traditionally.No one out there in America can saybtcause a party gives someone moneythat there is anything wrong with that.That is traditional American politics.

Mr. CLARK. I think what the amend-ment does and what it says is quite clear.I would like the Senator from Louisianato correct me if I am wrong. Every singlecommittee in the United States that falls

C', under this law would have a $3,000 lim-itation on the amount that they can con-tribute, with two exceptions carved outby this amendment: The national com-milttees of the two major parties and the

C congressional and senatorial committeesof the two major parties. In those cases

C; they would be allowed to give $20,000 indirect cash plus, in accordance with thepresent law, the national party commit-tees would be allowed to spend a nii-mum of $20,000 on their behalf.

That means that we are going to ar-rive at a conclusion where the two na-tional committees can now spend an ag-gregate of $40,000, $20,000 indirect and$20,000 direct, $40,000 minimum. In thoseStates where two cents a voter amountsto more than $20.000, they would be ableto spend in excess of that.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Will the SenatorYield for a question?

Mr. CLARK. Yes.Mr. JOHNISTON. flow much can those

sources now spend, assuming there is aPrimary, a runoff, and a general election?

Mr. CLARK. First of all, let us assumethat the primary, runoff, and generalelection do not occur in at least half ofthe races in America. We have never hada runoff, to my knowvledge, in any placein my part of the country. I do not thinkone can assume that one automaticallygets $5,000 In three elections. I think onthle average there wiU. be two elections,and on some occasions three elections.

That is direct money. What the Senatoris suggesting is that in those cases wherethere is a primary and a general electionwe would be able to double that to$20,000. I think it only means the Intro-duction of bigger money into politics andgreater cynicism about it, particularlywhen we are doing it for ourselves, par-ticularly when we are doing it to our owncommittees.

As I say, we debated this at length 2years ago. Maybe the Senate feels dif-ferently about it now, but I feel verystrongly that if we were to say that ourcommittees ought to be different, that weought to be able to give $20,000 insteadof $5,000, we would come In for a greatdeal of justifiable criticism.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, Justone final wvord. I believe the amendmentis well understood. I would like to simplypoint out that the $20,000 the NationalCommittee may now spend on behalf ofat candidate Is not inserted by thisamendment. That is not changed bythis amendment. All this _AmMei.mdoes Is inrt§Qbj frtejraro-ial campTaign commitltees Efromi.

~ say we are do-ing it for ourselves, what we mean isthat we are doing it for any candidatefor national office, whether he be a con-gressional candidate or a senatorial can-didate. In that sense, this is not a clubamendment, if one wants to call it that.It is not for incumbents; it is for anycandidate that thle committee may givemioney to.

Mr. ALLEN. Will the Senator yield?Mr. JOHNSTON. Yes, I wiU. yield.Mr. ALLEN. This would cover pri-

maries and run-off primaries as well,would it not?

Mr. JOHNSTON. That Is correct. Un-der the present law, the campaign com-mittee can give $5,000 for the primary,$5.000 in a run-off, and then another$5,000 in the general election, which isa total of $15,000. What this would al-low is to give the committee some flexi-bility. If the Senator's tough race is thegeneral, hie could withhold the whole$20,000 until that timne.

Mr. ALLEN. How often do either ofthe committees contribute to a chal-lenger of an incumbent?

Mr. JOHNSTON. In the case of theDemocratic Committee that is not done.Mr. ALLEN. In other words, this, then,is just for the benefit of incumbent,-;is that not right?

Mr. JOHNSTON. It would also applyto the challengers, I mean in those cases-w,,here an incumbent is beaten and a newincumbent is elected,

Mr. ALLEN. That is right; in otherwords, in general elect!ons. But throughthe primaries. fli*.ct anid second, it wouldbe the incumbent who was taken care of.I have no ot-jection to taking care of in-cumbents, but-

Mr. JOHNSTON. Except in cases whereyvou have no incumibemits, as in the caseof retirees.

Mr. ALLEN. B~ut where there is anincumlbent, there would be no Impedli-

merit to any Incumbent receiving funds,in the general election or primary, eitherone.

Mr. JOHNSTON. The Senator Is cor-rect in the point he makes, in the sensethat that is the standard operating pro-cedure under which we have operated,and I see no movement to change it. Butthe Senator is correct in the point hemakes.

Mr. ALLEN. I Just want us to under-stand what we are voting on. As long asthe incumbent is In the picture, he Is theone who gets the benefit of the increasedamount.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Not Just the incum-bent,

Mr. ALLEN. I say, as long as the in-cumnbent is in the picture, though, liewould be the one to really benefit.

Mr. TAFT. Mr. President, will the Sen-ator yield?

Mr. JOHNSTON. I yield to the Sena-tor from Ohilo.

Mr. ALLEN. But is that not true?Mr. JOHNSTON. Yes; the Senator Is

correct.Mr. TAFT. Is it not true that that de-

pends upon what the committee involveddesired to do? If the committee involveddesired to make other rules. it couldmake other rules as to the distributionof those donations.

Mr. JOHNSTON. That Is correct.There is no rule that specifies how a na-tional committee or a senatorial comi-mittee is going too spend its money.

Mr. TAFT. Well, the Senator is notentirely correct. The Republican senia-tonial committee does have certain rules.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Well, yes.Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, will the

Senator yield?Mr. JOHNSTON. I yield.Mr. CLARK. I would like to ask thle

Senator if his amendment would allowthe national committee to give moremoney to a Presidential campaign. DoesIt increase the limit that may be givento a Presidential candidate?

Mr. JOHNSTON. I do not believe so.It is not Intended to, arid I do not be-lieve that the phraseology is subject tothat interpretation.

Mr. CLARK. That is the way I wouldinterpret it. Therefore, I wonder if thiswould not be Interpreted, and quite ac-curately, as an amendment aimed onlyat helping Senators and Members of Con-grees. The Senator seeks to permit thosenational committees to give us more, butnot the President more. We are not rais-ing the amount the national committeecan give to a President; that remains thlesame.

Mr. JOHNSTON. That is correct.Mr. CLARK. So It seems to me all we

are doing is saying we want to funnel alot more money into Senate and congres-sional campaigns through giving the na-tional committee a separate contributionlimitation, and the same with the cami-paign committees. I do not see how itcould be interpreted except that way, asa means of getting more money into ourown congressional campaigns.

I think, as the Senator from Alabamahas emphasized, it is merely a means of

45 C)

S 3807

WNGRESSTONAI. RECORD -SEN*0 March 18, 1976

t 11

ii

JRotical Vote No. 85 Leg-tYEAS--64

twmrtlc'tt

ii c,11110 Iiit'elitsell

Byrdl, RUerot

C'ase

1)01SU l

Do:itl o

D'liiemit

IOl ill

.;11*111.11iimi

A t ,1 r

C',riftluHlansenfItaskeli

i at haiA yTfritsk'a

C. ICtilestoilHtumtphre yI nouye.1 oh u ston[saint tLea hy

tontoy

%11it i tie

NelsonP'ac kwood

Pastoz ePetllPercyProxmireRtandolphiti coff

SchweikerScott, HughScott,

William USparkumamaStennisStevensSvin zirtoflTo f t'riut iadeThi nnioiidTrowerTamn eyWVetckerWillianis

IAlen

llroc SBtrooke

Bu rd ickJiveel.

Hurry F.. Jtr.

ClarkCxii xexDuar kinHart, Cart.Hart, Philip A.Hol1lingsJavOits

Mat hiasMc~lovernMcI at yre

,,toing more ruiney Into an Incumbent'siipaign. because this amendment doesaiiiior i ncumilbenits. For all toose reasons.

Mr. P'residcnt, I hiope, the Senate will notmi.iot this nlicadineit, because I thinkit %e open up the flood gates and sityttis comimittee ough to go from $5,000it) $20,000. we will have a very difficuiltlite inl saving that State committeels,

tmitnty comiiiiitt4'C5. and other commnit-lcs ought not to be able to dothat. Theni

weC wXill not have a $5,000 limitation oil

coiuittecs. but at $20,000 limitation.After all, how does one justify increus-ig fromt $5,000 to $20,000 for national

coininittees and not State comnilttees?IMit. JOHINSTON. 'Mr. President, will

tic Senator yield at that point so thatI nity ask for the yeas and nays?

Nh'. CLARK. Yes.Ni'. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I ask

ilt the yeas and nays.I'hie ACTrING PRESIDENT pro tein-

pore (Mr. HANSEN) . Is there a sufficientso1 cond? There is a suffcient second.

'Ito yeas and nays were ordered.Mr. JOHNSTON. I thank the Senator.N1I1'. CLARK. Mr. President, I am pie-

psi red to yield back the remainder of mnytine.

M r. JOHNSTON. I yield back the re-mao incler of my timie.

Trhe ACTING PR7ESIDENT pro tern-poe All remaining time having beenyielded back, the question is onl agreeingto the amendment of the Senator f romnLouisiana (Mr. JOHNSTON). On thisqueistion, the yeas and nays have beenord*(ered, aind the clerk will call the roll.

'[he legislative clerk called the roll.Mi'r. ROBERT C. BYRD. I announce

that the Senator from Idaho (Mr.('tliitctQ, the Senator from Indiana (Mi'.IIAIITHE), and the Senator from Wash-ington (Mr. JACKSON) are necessailyablsenlt.

I further announce that, if presentand voting, the Senator from Washing-ton (Mr. JACKSON) w.ould vote "yea."

Mr. GRIFFIN. I announce that theSenator from North Carolina (Mr.lHELMS) and the Senator from NorthDakota (M1\r. YouNcG) are necessarilyabsent.

I further announce that the Senatorfromn Vermont .Mr. STAFFORD) is absent(iWe to illness.

I fui'ther announce that, if presentandI voting, the Senator from NorthCarolinia (Mr. HELMS) would vote "yea.'

The result was announced-yeas 64nayos 30. as follows:

('hirt ke Helms.1IacSoii

MetcalfMoutal eMorganMoss

PeursoflRtothSte venslonStolle

Staffordyoung

8agIreedt.NTfi-CIANNON. The President. I move

to reconsider the vote by which the famendment was agreed to.a

Mr. TAFT. I mnove to lay that on the Ctable.

Trhe motion to lay onl thle table wasagreed to.

Mr'. TAFT'. Mr'. President. I send to thedesk anl amendment to the pending sub-stitute by Mr. GRIFFIN.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. ThesieninenI't will be stated.

The second assistant legislative clerkpi'oceeded to read the amendment.

Mr. TAPvI . I ask unanimous consentthat further reading of the amendmentbeC dispeinsed with.

Thle PRESIDING OFFICER. Withoutobhjection, it is so ordered,

The amendment is as follows:0n prwe 1. in sumbsectionl (c) (1) after the

word 'ballot.', add thle following: 'or certi-fies to the C'oniiision that lie will iiot beniu act ive candidate In thc primary".

At. thle eud of siibsection (c) (1) add thefollowing niew seNtence: 'The provisions ofth1-is sectioil shall apply as of the date ofenlactiilt."

Mr. TAFT'. This is an amendmnent thathad ali'eady passed onl the first Grilinsubstitute and on tile bill itself. I ain at-tempting now to put it into the secondGriffin substitute. As% the Members of theSenate who were here will recall, theatmendment relates to a limitation on thepayout ,;hare to thle Presidential can-didates. It eliminates candidates who,for two consecutive primaries, havetinder 10 percent of the vote in thoseprlimnaries, with the piovision thiat Seia-tot' BAYH asked to be included, to theeffect that if a candidate wishes to cer-tify that he is not ain active candidate.

Lthis will not coulit agmainst him in thatprlimarIy so far as elimination is con-ceri'ed. I know of no objection to it. Itwent through by a voice vote originally.

Mr'. CANNON. Mr. President. do I un-derstand correctly that this is, the samea inendinent to decertify Presidentialcandidates provided that they do not geta certain percent of the votes in the pr'i-mary. and this is the amendment that

Was offered befoi'e to S. 3065 and also tothle pi'eviouws Griffin substittute?

Mr. TAFT. Thle Senator is entirelycorrect.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President.' I amwillmrg to accept the amnildmient. I thinkit is ai good amendmnent.

Thte PRESIDING OFFICER. The qlues-tion is onl agreeiin to the amiendmnent.

The amlendmlent was agieed to.

Mi'. CRANSTON. Mr. President, I sendan amendent to the desk and ask forius immiiediate conusidera tion.

NOT VOTING-U

40

S 3808

m

Mr MTANSFIELD. Mr. President. v-111ie Senator yield?Mir. CRANSTON, Certainly.

IODIFICATIO, ORDER TO RE-PORT SENATE: ESOLLITION 400

Mr. MANSFIEL If I may have thlettention of the Se ate, I ask unanimousonsent that tile )rder of the Senateiandlating thle Ser Ete Rules Committeeo report Senate Resolution 400 est~ab-Lshing a Standing Committee on Intel-igence Activities o 1 March 20. 1976. beiodified as followsSenate Resoluti n 400 be reported

orthwithi from the Committee on Ruleslnid immnediately b referred simultane-usly to the Conm tee on the Judiciaryumd to the Commit, ee on Rules;

Trhat thle Commi tee on the Judiciarynake Its reconim idatlons on Senatetesolutiln 400 not later than the close)f busiiness on Mar .h 29, 1978 and thathie recoinmendatio of the Committee)n the Judiciary be 'eferred without fur-ther action by the S4nate to the Commit-tee onl Rules;. and

'rhat the Rules ,ommittee report Itsfinal recommendat ons not later thanApril 5, 1976.

Mr. JAVITS. Mr. resident, may I inl-rquire-

Mr. MANSFIEL . This has beenicleared.

Mr. JAVITS. Mi. President. I JustwAanted to know th t, because I happento be the only ran Ing member of theCommllittee on Gov rnment Operationshere.

M~r. MANSFIELD I looked for theSenlator, but he w not available. Ilewas in a hearing.

Mr. JAVITS. I nUII rstand.Mr. MANSFIELD I cleared it With

Senators CANNON. ATFIELD. EASTLAND,Tv,.%EY, HART. BYR HRUSKA, RiBICOFF.and SCOTT.

Mr. JAVITS. Has I, been cleared withMr. PERCY, the rank g member?

Mr. MANSFIELD I shall trust theSenator f rom Newv Y rk to get him.

Mr, JAVITS. I shi 1 not object. I justwanted to know that.

Mr. MANSFIELD. I thank the Sell-oqtor.

FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACTAMENDMENTS OF -1976

The Senate continued with the con-siderationi of the bill (S. 3065) to amnendthe Federal Election Campaign Act of1971 to pr'ovide for its administrationby a Federal Election Commission ap-l)Ointecl ill accordance with the require-rnlents of thle constitution. and for otherpurposes.

Mr. CRANSTON. I yield to the Senatorfromn Oklahomia for a unanimous-Conl-isent request.

'Mr. BARTLETT. I ask unanimous conl-sen-t thiat Don Cogmian of mly staff beaccorded privileges of the floor duringcaisideratioli of this measure.

'rhe PR ESIDING OFFICER. Without(),) ectioll. it is so or-dered.

Mlr. CRANSTON. I send anl amieid-mplnt to thle desk ind ask for itz coil-side ratioll. OFCR h

The PRESIDING OFCR hatiield(llelnt will be st, td

S,1150socileties devoted to f4of space through Bsaveiopment of spacelaw; and

Whereas the InterqtFeIernationl AtsthedIernain Licand the Internatiollrepresent the world'sastronaiiticl, thle Spalaw. and

Whereas the InteriFederation will holdAnahieim. California,dtennial Year of our Nrtile vital contributionStates to the scientifiwealth of our civilizatil

Whereas the host27th Congress. to beCongres,. are the AAeronauitics and AstroAstronlAttical Society,Associationl, the Newciety and the RockeInc.: and

WVhereas the "IAF '7tended by hundreds othe International AstratlSIlated organization'fronm umany nations; ar

Whereas the "IAFduct sessions and presof amtronautcs, andtSpace law thereby adesing International coostanding In these cr1technology, and law; a

Whereas the Amenltennial Administratlo'76" Congress as a sigrthle Htorizon '76 themetenisial commnemiorati

WVhereas the Inter:rcdleration, its affiliaits member societieshope and promitse totinted advancementmnts In the fields ofsctines. and spacemnents having brougihumnanity; and

WVhereas the InterFederation strongly astton of space and thevironnment of spaceman's greatest aspiratneeds on earth: Now,

ReRolved, Th'lat theStates recognizes theCongress of the InterFederation to be heldfromn October 10 thrcommends the InterFederation and Its affiselecting thle Unitedfor its 27th CongressBicentennial of the Umnds the host orgazStates for sponsoring

SEC. 2. The Secretetransmit a suitablyresolution to thle InteFederation.

Mr. MOSS. I thaNevada for his kind

NGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENA*tering the exploratione science and the do-echnology and space

ational AstronauticalHated organizationl.eniy of Astronauticsastitute of Space Law.eading authorities inesciences and space

ational AstronauticalLa 27th Congress Intring 1975, the 11icen-ion. In recognition ofmadle by the United

*.tecinical and legaln; aindganizations for thisailed the "IAP '76"

* eric. Institute ofautics, the Americanhe Aerospace Medicalrk Cardiological So-

*Research Institute,

Congress will be at-f eople who belong to* sutical Federation'sS d member societies

17 "Congress will con-

t papers In all areasspace sciences, and

al 'ing and strengthen-o ration and under-

,t al areas of science,LIc Revolution Bicen-n recognizes the "IAPsI cant contribution to

the national Bi1cen-0 and

n1 tonal Astronauticaltc organizations, anidr resent considerableti world for the con-0 man's accomplish-aronautics. the space

la , such accomplish-it a better life to all

nla lonal Astronauticalup orts man's explora-

p oper use of the en-n rder to help fulfill1o s and meet his vitalth refore, be ItS nate of the United

lim ortance of the 27thna lonal AstronauticalIn naheim, California,>u October 16, 1976;Ila onal Astronauticalhta d organizations forSt tea as the location

recognition of the'ni d States: and comn-Ai ions of the United:t Congress.Lry f the Senate shallens rtbed copy of thismna tonal Astronautical

*nk hie Senator from

F'EDERAL ELECTON CAMPAIGN ACTAMfEND'MENTS OF 1976

The Senate continued with the con-sideration of the bill (S. 3065) to amendthe Federal Election Campa.ign Act of1971 to provide for its administration bya Federal Election Commission appointedin accordance writha the requirements ofthe Constitution, and for other purposes.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, what isthe pending business?

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. The pending business Is 5. 3065.

SAbEWNZMNT NO. 1516

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I call upmy amendment in the form of a substi-tute to S. 3065.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. The clerk will state the amend-meent.

The legislative clerk read as follows:Thie Senator from Nevada (Mr. CANNON)

for himself, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. MANSFIELD,Mr. HtUGHr SCOTT, Mr. ROBEsT C. BYRD and Mr.GIFIFIN proposes an amendment In thenature of a substitute numbered 1516.

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I askunanimous consent that the reading ofthe substitute be dispensed with.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-pore. Without objection, it is so ordered.

(Thle amendment is printed in theRECORtD of March 23, 1976, pages 84066thiough S4074.)

Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, yester-day afternoon an amendment In thef orm of a substitute to S. 3065 was in-troduced by myself, Senator HATFIELD,Senator MANSFIELD, Senator HUGH SCOTT,Senator RORERT C. BYRD, and SenatorGRIFFIN. This substitute represents anattempt by both sides of the aisles toset forth a reasonable compromise pro-posal which we can discuss and hope-fully reach agreement on in the nearf uture.

It is understood that there are a num-ber of amendments to this substitutewhich will be pIroposed and consideredby the Senate. At this time, however. Iwould like to set forth the changes andmodifications which this substituteamendment would make to S. 3065 as ithad been unended onl the floor prior toyester'day.

The essential structure, and in manyimportant respects, the substance of S.3065 remains intact with the followingmodifications:

First of all, section 102 of S. 3065,creating an eight-member commission-the niumber of commissioners was ex-panded from six to eight by SenatorMATIIIAS's amendment which was np-proved by the Senate-remains thesame, with the deletion of the provisionprohibiting oultside business activities ofcomniissioners and the deletion of theprovision requiring in a majority voteof the commission that no less than twoof the five-member majority be affiliatedwith the same political party.

In the definitional section 102 a provi-sion was added excluding from the def -inition, of expenditure for limitation pur-poses partisan activity designed to en-courage individuals to register to vote,or to vote, conducted by the nationalcommittee of a political party, or a sub-ordinate committee thereof, or the Statecommittee of a national party. Such par-tisan activity would, however, be requiredto be reported. This addition had beenapproved by thle Senate as an amend-ment to an earlier substitute but had notbeen proposed as an amendment to S.3065. In addition, the substitute woulddelete a surplus definition of indepenid-ent expenditure which is not used Ii thebill or the substitute as a defined termi.

Section 1.04 of S. 3065 contained some

March 204, 1976provisionis related to reports by politicalcommittees and candidates, in particularthe reporting requirement for Independ-ent expenditures, Here the substitute hasinclude the reporting requirement pro-Posed by Senator PAcKwooD for expendi-tuires inade by coirporations' and labororganlizationls' commnllicationls to theirstockholders or members expressly advo-cating the election or defcat of a clearlyidentified candidate. This reporting re-quirement has been expanded to equi-tabily apply to all membership organiza-tions requiring them to report expendi-tures directly attributable to such com-munications and for that reason hasbeen transferred to the reporting sec-tions of the act from the section whichdealt only with corporations and labororganizations,

I might add here that I understandthat there will be an amendment pro-posed to set forth a reasonable floor onsuch reports to the Commission to re-lieve the burden of such reporting onlsmall businesses and membership orga-nizations, as well as to clarify the natureof the expenditures which must be re-ported. I personally feel such an amend-ment would be an equitable and clarify-Ing addition to this disclosure provisionand intend to give It my strong support.

The portions of S. 3065 which relate tothe general enforcement powers of theCommission which have been previouslydiscussed on the floor remain intact.These are sections 106 and 108 of S.3065 and the only change is a minor oneto clarify that where a conciliationag-reemient, unless violated, constitutesan absolute bar to any further action by,the Commission, it is a bar to furtheraction with respect to the violationwhich Is the subject of the agreement.

The substitute amendment deletes Pllthe advisory opinion provisions of S.3065. The effect of this Is to retain exist-ing law in section 437f of title 2, UnitedStates Code, exactly as it now it.

The substitute also would delete thoseprovisions in S. 3065 relating to theHouse of Representatives procedure forconsidering the Commission's proposedrules and regualations, leaving this as amatter for the House to act upon at alater time.

The substitute does not make anychanges in the section of S. 3065 relatingto limitations on contributions and ex-penditures. as amended to date by theSenate, except In the following specificrespects. First, a provision is added toprovide for an unlimited transfer offunds between and among political com-mittees of the same political party to-gether with a provision to assure thatthe antiproliferation rule of S. 3065wold not apply to contribtltions by apolitical party through a national com-mittee and to contributions by that partythrough a single State committee in eachState. Second. the amendment to S. 3065proposed by Senator JOHNSTON and pre-viously adopted by the Senate is modi-fied to clarify that contributions Wythespeciflecp rty comittees doiinot ggrer

gateSoj1an$20,0O in an _ection

This substitute also modifies the sec-tion of S. 3065 related to the solicitation

492

S 4158II

f~ ~I

III

~1]I

III

U''

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, a fewda~ys ago, I offered an amendment on be-half of myself. Senator STEWIs, andSenator Bzrrrsr. the effect of whichwould be to increasii. thdamunt which,stVnatorlal campaign commttees and thehlouise caxnpaign .committtees .could give.to a candidate f rom $5,000 per election to$2.0,.000 per year. After that amendmentha~d passed-of course, we have inter-vetied with this substitute bill, but, In themeanutime, we have heard from our col-lewi:ues In the House, who tell us thatnwaking this applicable to the Housecomi~fhttees would have the untowardand unwanted effect of raising expecta-tions of I-ouse Members way beyond re-ality. They tell us that, whereas they maybe able to give $1,000 or $2,000 per Mem-ber of Congress, with tis kind of lan-guage, Members of Congress would comein expecting their $20,000.

I do not know whether we are going tobe able to approach anything close tothose kinds of numbers on the Senatecamnpaignl committees. We shall have towait to see how our respective f und-rais-ing events come out to determine howsuccessful we are in that respect. But theHouse people assure us that It Is waybeyond reality and it would have the verymischidevous effect of disappointing manwMembers of the H-ouse. Accordingly, theyasked to be deleted f rom the specia.treatment which our amendment of lasiweek gave. All this amendment, there.fore, does is excise the words "Congress'or "Democratic Congressional Commit'tee" or "Republic Congressional Cornmittee" from the amendment, which. Iituru, maes. the,.amendment, the $20,001limilt, applicable only to the- Senatecommlitces and not to the House committe8v

Mr.CANON.Mr. President, thaamendment 1s accpta~ble to me as thmanager of the bill, on the basis that thSena~tor has stated It. I am willing to accept the amendment.

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE March 24, 1976

quest is to allow Senators who opposethis amendment to be notified so theycan be present: Is that correct?

Mr. PACKWOOD. That is correct.Mr. ALLEN. I have nlo objection.The PREsIDIN OFFICER. Without

objection, It Is so ordered.Thec Chair in his capacity as the Sena-

tor from Wisconsin suggests the absenceof a quoruni, and the clerk will call theroll.

The second assistant legislative clerkproceeded to call the roll

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I askuinanimous consent that the order forthe quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.NELsoiv). Without objection, it is so or-dered.

Mr. JOHNSTON. Mr. President, I havean nmendment which I send to the deskand awsk for its immediate consideration.

The PRESIDING OFFCER. T1heaniendtuent will be stated.

The legislative clerk read as follows:On tm5g 35, ine 15, strike the words "or

lloio od Representatives."on ixige 35. beginning with line 21. strike

the words "the DernoCl'atic National Con-gr.~d.onal Committee, the National Republi-can "Curemonal Committeen.

500

Mr. JOHNSTON. I thank my coleagu. hI ask for Its consideration, Mr. Presi- N4

dent. tMr. PACKWOOD. Mr. President, I

have no objection to the amendment t~The PRESIDING OFFICER. Thle ques- II

tion is on agreeing to the amendment. cThe amendment was agreed to.Mr. CANNON. Mr. President. I suggest

the absence of a quorum.VThe PRESIDING OFFICER. '71m clerk I

will call the roll.aThe second assistant legislative clerk Z

proceeded to call the roll.Mr. CANNON. Mr. President, I aska

unanimous consent that the order f or ethe quonrnm call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFCER . Withouttobjection, It Is so ordered.

Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, I send tothe desk an unprinted amendment andask that it be read.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerkwill state the amendment

The legislative clerk read as follows;:On page 25, between lines 4 "n 5, insert

the following:P'ROHIBITION( ON CONVERSIONI 0? COUT'raBwrONS

TiO PERSON&L USS

SEC. 107A. Section 317 of the Act (2 US.C.439a), as redesignated by section 105, isamended by striking out "or may be usedfor any other lawful purpose.,' and insertingin lieu thereof the following: "May be eon-tributod to him to the National ooamitteoor State commite of a political party, orreturned by him to his contributors on apro rata basis (as determined by the Coml-mission), or contributed by him to anothercandidate."

Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, the pur-pose of this amendment clearly Is sim-ply to correct a flaw In the present law,which could, under certain circuml-stances, result in the conversion of excesscampaign funids to personal use. 'Thisamendment would slmpiy add a sectionwhereby we would correct that.

I might say this amendment was sug-gested by Congressmian BERKLEY BEDELL.I think it is a good one. We have talkedto the manager of the bill and to otherparties Interested in this bill. What Itwould do, frankly, is to say that, in

*addition, if one has campaign contribu-tion money left over, in addition to thetwo present ways In which that moneycan be disposed of-namely, to defrayoffice expenses or to contribute to acharity-we are now providing threeadditional ways that the money can bedisposed of without converting to per-sonal use. Those are to contribute It toa State or National party committee, tocontribute it to another candidate's

I committee, or to return it on at pro rataIbasis to the contributors.

We think this Is important because.be know historically that money has.been converted from political commit-.tees to personal use If income tax Is paid

i on it. and we would like to prevent that,D and that Is the purpose of the amend-

ment, and I urge its adoption.*Mr. PACKWOOD. Mr. President, uvillthe Senator from Iowa yield?e Mr. CLARK. I yield.

e Mr. PACKWOOD. Do I understand- from the Senator's amendment that at

the moment a candidate would be pro-

j

Ibited from giving this surplus to theratial comittee or a Mtb 00Mmt-Be?Mr. CLARK. It Is not clear whether

hiey would be prevented under presentaw, but we would like to make It veryleer, at any rate, that that would beermissible under the law.Mr. PACKWOOD. Well, In that case,hy strike out "for any other lawfuliurpose"I Why -not add the Senator's6meridment indicating this Is a lawfulrurpose?

Mr. CLARK. Well, the reason we aretriking "for any other lawful purpose"~ven though that phrase seem to us'ether clearly to allow State sud Na,-tonal committees to take funds Is thatwe would like to make It possible inLddltion for them to return the moneyz their contributor. as an alternativeway of disposing of the money and toallow them to contribute to anothercandidate.

In other words, it is not at anl clearthat those other two methods we arenow adding are permissible under thelaw presently.

Mr. PACKWOOD. I have no objectionto the Senator's amendment, but I comeback again why not simply leave In "forany other lawful purpose" and Put In theSenator's defluitions of lawful purpose,what that would Include. What are westriking out when we strike out "or forany other lawful purpose"? What can acandidate now do with money that acandidate could not do With thatstricken out?

Mr. CLARK. The point is under thepresent law it seems quite clear that aperson can convert campaign funds topersonal use If he pays income tax on itlawfully, and that is why we are strik-ing that section and specifying the exactw.ays in which the money can be cOn-verted. In other words, it would leavethe bill as it Is under present law If weleave this phrase in. that candidates canindeed convert campaign funds for per-sonal use.

Mr. PACKWOOD. What bothers me--and I agree with the Senator that theyshould not be converted to personaluse-is what might be any other lawfulpurpose we are thinking of that is notconversion to personal use that we arestriking out by striking out that phrase?

Mr. CLARK. Well, we are not aware ofany other purpose for which Campaignf unds, in our Judgment, ought to be used.

Mr. PACKWOOD. Mr. President, willthe Senator withhold his amendmentthen and let me try to draft an amend-ment because I agree with the Senatorabout conversion, but I would like tomake sure that we limit it to that pur-pose.

When we legislate on the floor, thingscome up that we do not think 'about,and I would not want us to trap a mem-ber. unconsciously trap a member, of theHouse or of the Senate 'who is nowspending it for a lawful conversion anwhich that amendment might strike out.

Mr. CLARK. I would be happy to con-sult with the Senator.

Mr. President, I request that MYamendment be withdrawn.

.1 "LI C3, 1976 corIt is therefore grossly misleading to

.%uggest that the inclusion in this bill ofprovisions clarifying the. political activi-ties permitted to corporations and laborunions is an attempt to "change therules" in midstream.

On the contrary, what the conferencecommittee has done Is to restore the ruleswhich governed Federal elections from1971 until the Commission's Sun Oil de-cision last December.

We have, moreover, dlour' so in a man-ner that is fair and evenhanded.

A labor union, like a corporation, mayestablish only one political committee,so that the limitations the act imposeson contributions may not be avoided.

Similarly, a labor union, like a corpora-tion, must report voter registration andget -out-tile-Vote expenditures made onbehalf of a specific candidate in excessof $2,000 per election.

And a labor union, Aike a corporation,may solicit contributions from the non-organized employees of a company onlytwice a year, and then only by mail.

Mr. Speaker, if the word "fairness" iim-.plies at balaincing of rights, this bill rep-resents an equitable balance between the

S rights of corporations and labor unions.It is the product of deliberation. negotia-tion and compromise.

It is a good bill supported by membersof the conference committee of both

S parties.It is strongly supported by Common

^J Cause. which has been a vigorous chain-pion of campaign reform.

It will bring to an end the hiatus inS Federal matching funds which during

the last month has hampered candidatesfor President in both parties.

I urge all Members to cast their voteIn favor of the reasonable provisions emi-

C~bodied in this bill in order that we mightsend it to the President without furtherdelay.

And I would then urge the Presidentto slgi the measure into law. A veto

C would be most irresponsible on his part.We must have clean elections in thiscountry.

Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, will thegentleman yield?

ff~ Mr. BRADEMAS. I yield to the gentle-man f rom New Jersey.

(Mr. THOMPSON asked and was givenpermission to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentleman and I would liketo associate myself with the gentleman'sremarks. Having been one of those whoengaged in a colloquy to establish therules in 1971, I felt very strongly aboutthe misinterpretations of the Commis-sion in handing down StYNPAC. I mustsay that the final solution arrived at bythe conference, thanks to the chairman,the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. HAYS),the gentleman from California (Mr.WIGGINS). the gentleman in the well andothers, it seems to Me an eminently fairsolution to this difficult problem.

Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, I thankthe gentleman from New Jersey.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker. I yieldSuch time as he may consume to thegentleman from South Dakota (Mr.PRESLER).

(Mr. PRESSLER asked and was given

qGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOI)

permission to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. PRESSLER. Mr. Speaker, the Fed-eral Election Commission Act amend-mnents conference report has today beenvoted on by this body. The first time wein the House voted on these amendments,I cast a "no" vote because I was opposedto certain aspects of the bill which I feltharmed our Federal election processrather than made it more accountable.However, I today cast an "aye" vote, be-cause certain changes in the conferencecommittee were made in the bill whichmade it more acceptable and I feelstrongly that we must act on this legisla-tion to insure the orderly continuationof the electoral system presently in force.

These changes included deleting aHouse provision, which had required theFEC to submit all future advisory opin-ions to the Congress as regulations forcongressional approval as well as any ad-visory opinions issued after October 15,1974. In addition, the conference reportdoes provide for more equal solicitationby corporate and union political actioncommittees. Both groups-corporate andlabor-must report carefully all expendi-tures in communicating to their membersin regard to helping or defeating candi-dates.

I am not f ully satisfied with this leg-islation; but It has been changed suf-ficiently in the House-Senate conferenceto cause me to vote "aye."

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield2 minutes to the distinguished minorityleader. the gentleman from Arizona (Mr.RHODES).

(Mr. RHODES asked and was givenpermission to revise and extend his re-marks.o

Mr. RHODES. Mr. Speaker, I recentlyreceived a statement from the President,as follows: "The President as previouslystated favors a simple reconstitution ofthe Federal Election Commission consist-ent with the Supreme Court decision.However, the President will carefully re-view the congressional approaoch andmake a decision consistent with the or-derly and responsible conduct of the elec-tion process."

I think any fair interpretation of thisstatement is that the President has notmnade up his mind whether he would signthis bill or whether he would not.

I would like to state, however, that thereason we are here is that the SupremeCourt found that parts of the act of 1974were unconstitutional; mainly, the partdealing with the way the Federal Elec-tion Commission was Put together. Itseems to mne. and I expressed myself Inthis manner at that time, that it wouldhave been much wiser on the part of theRouse and of the Senate to reconstitutethe Commission as the Supreme Courtrequired and not to go Into the nuts andbolts of the election law during an elec-tion Year. It seems to me there Is muchto be gained by having some Idea justwhat sort of law we operate under in thiselection. It seems to me we should notchange the rules as we cross the stream.It does not serve any good purpose.

I recognize that this bill has as one ofIts main thrusts the idea of trying to doaway with the SUNPAC decision of the3FEC.

sf' H 37834I ca n understand why some of the

gentlemen on my right would want to dothat, because It does guarantee the rightof free speech for a corporation andallows the corporation actually to ask itsown emlployees to contribute funds fotrpolitical purposes. Personally, I do not set!anything bad about free speech. When.the first amendment is brought up inother contexts, I think most people, bothon my right and on my left, support theapplication of it liberally so that all peo-ple can let other people know how theyfeel on matters like this.

The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.McFALL). The time of the gentlemanfrom Arizona has expired.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield1 additional minute to thc distinguishedminority leader.

Mr. RHODES. I ask the question, whywould not the board of directors andmanagement of a corporation be underthe same types of rules and have thesame privilege of communication asother people?

I congratulate the committee on this-the committee has tried to take awaysome of the unfair tilt of the 1974 lawtoward organized labor. Nevertheless thetilt, if this bill becomes law, would stillbe very strongly pro-union and anti-business, and it will be very stronglypro-Democratic and very strongly pro-incumbent. Therefore, I find myself un-able to support this bill.

Again. I congratulate the Memberswho worked on this. They worked hard.they worked long, and I think they cameup with a bill which is much better thanthe one we started out wvith. but evenso the tilt is still there, the bias is stillthere, and I cannot support it.

Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker. I yield 2minutes to the gentleman from NewYork (Mr. PEYSER).

(Mr. PEYSER asked and was givenpermission to revise and extend his re-marks.)

Mr. PEYSER. Mr. Speaker, while Isupport and now will vote for this bill, Imust say that I take very strong excep-tion to one section of the bill, and I donot quite understand how it even workedits way Into the Program at all. This dealswith the section on page 18 which saysthat the Senate committee, the Senatecampaign committees will be iiithdilzed

Wyown experinc- in this area in,dealing with my own party, the Republi-can National Senate Committee, clearlyshows that these committees operate ar-bitrarily, disc rimina tori ly and, in cases,deceptively. These funds are used Strictlyto protect incumbents. In reality, theyare the antithesis of campaign reform,and I am very surprised the conferees nlI-lowed this to become part of the bill. Itseems to me that we should be protectingthe public against what we know to bethe misuse of funds.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, willthe gentleman yield?

Mr. PEYSER. I yield to the gentlemanfrom Ohio.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. I assume the gen-tleman is saying all these things, thesebad things, about the Republican Sena-torial Campaign Committee, and not

1083

II 3784 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -H OEMa3,16

about the Democratic commaittee. I donot know what they do or how they do It,but the Democratic committee does notoperate that way.

Mr. PEYSER. I say to the chairman, Ihave stated It very plainly about who Iam speaking right now. I cannot saywhat the Democratic committee does,but I was going to ask the chairman aquestion a3 to the reason why this sec-tion (h) on page 18 ever became part ofthis act, because I do not think It refersto anything we have discussed in theH ouse.

Mr. RAYS of Ohio. Well, it refers tothe fact that we have placed a prohibi-tion of $5,000 on these committees, andthe Senate simply would not buy it.Under the rules of comity, in order to geta bill, I had to let them more or less setthe limits on their campaign committee,but on the House committees we re-tained the original $5,000. 1 would havebeen a lot happier ltwe retained It all upmid down the line.

Mr. PEYSER. I thank the gentleman.Mr. WIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield

1 minute to the gentlewoman from NewJersey (Mrs. Fz~wicx).

(Mrs. FENWICK asked and was givenpermission to revise and extend her re-marks.)

Mrs. FENWICK. Mr. Speaker, I thankmy colleague for yielding to me. I thinkP11 of us who care very much about elec-tion reform were bitterly disappointedwith the House bill when it left theh1ouse, particularly as it limited dis-closure. I voted against It, but I am nowpersuaded that this bill, although stillimperfect, deserves support.

The gentleman from Indiana, who wasin the well earlier, said very clearly thatwe must have clean elections; and, in-deed, we must. We are not going to getthem if we continue to clip the wings ofthe Federal Election Commission, if wecontinue to restrict Its powers. Butneither will we help reform without aCommission.

Mr. Speaker, there are several clausesIn this bill which has come from theconference with which I do not agree.But I do not think we can stand here,crying for election reform, urging elec-tion. reform, and voting against everybill that comes down the pike with atleast some election reform. in it.

This bill at least re-establishes theCommission; it contains some electionreform, and 1, therefore, intend to re-verse my previous vote and support it.

Mr. WVIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I yield5 minutes to the gentlenman from Michi-gan (Mr. VANDER JAGT).

Mr. VANDER JAGT asked and wasgiven permission to revise and extend hisremnarks.)

Mr. VANDER JAQT. Mr. Speaker, If Icould have the attention of the distin-gished chairman, the gentleman fromOhio (Mr. HAYS), I take this time inorder to clarify some of the language inthis bill as it relates to contribution limi-tations.

I believe the language is clear, but be-cause It is a long and complex bill I Justwant the legislative intent to be crystalclear for any future interpreters.

The present law allows an individualto give all or any part of his annual $25,-

000 limit to a rnultlcandldate committee.This bill changes this in the followingway:

If an individual wishes to contributeto a multicandidate committee, such asa corporate or union political actioncommittee, he may give up to $5,000 toeach such committee. However, his ag-gregate contribution still may not exceedhis $25,000 annual limit. An individualmay use his entire annual limit by con-tributing to the committees establishedor maintained by a national politicalparty, but no more than $20,000 may begiven to any one such committee.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, if thegentleman will yield, that Is correct. Nomore than $20,000 to any one.

Air. VANDER JAUT. An individualunder both present law and this bill maynot contribute more than $1,000 per can-didate per election.

Unlike individuals, qualified multi-candidate committees under present lawdo not have an annual $25,000 limit. Thisremains the case in S. 3065. Likewise,such a committee may not contributemore than $5,000 per election to any onecandidate or to committees which oper-ate exclusively on behalf of that candi-date.

So there is no change there.S. 3065 does make a substantial change

In the amounts which multicandidatecommittees may transfer to other multi-candidate committees. As I read the billthe restrictions would be as follows:

A multicandidate committee maytransfer to tiny other multicandidatecommittee $5,000 p~er year. However, Ifthe recip~ient of this transfer is a com-mittee established and maintained by anational political party, then the limitwould be $15,000 per year, Any numberof these transfers to various party com-mittees may be made by the same multi-candidate committee.

Is that correct?Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is correct.Mr. VANDER JAGT. I thank the gen-

tleman.Finally, on this section, if all commit-

tees which are involved in the transferare national, State, district, or local com-mittees-including any subordinate com-mittee thereof--of the same politicalparty, then none of the limitations apply.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is correct.Mr. VANDER JAGT. I note with great

interest that the conference report statesthat the term "political committee es-tablished and maintained by a nationalpolitical party" includes the Senate andHouse campaign committees. Since I amthe chairman of the National RepublicanCongressional Committee, and since thegentleman from Ohio is the chairman ofthe Democratic National CongressionalCommittee. I wish the RECORD to clearlyIndicate that, although our respectivecomnittes are categorized as "establishedand maintained by a national politicalp~arty" for purposses of sections 320(a)

1) (B) and 320(a) 2)(B), that is notnecessarily the fact of the matter, ex-cept for the purposes of those two sec-tions and those two sections alone. Forall other purposes, our committees arecreations of the representatives of thetwo political parties which have beenelected to the House. Speaking for my

committee, I can state unequivocally thatthe Republican Congressional ComimitteeIs not maintained by, nor Is it In any waysubordinate to the Republican NationalCommittee.

However, it Is clearly the conferees'Intent that the House and Senate cam-paign Committees are each entitled toreceive up to $20,000 from an individualand up to $15,000 from any multicandi-date committees.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, I willsay to the gentleman that I agree withhim. No matter how these committeesare created, for the purposes of the lawthey are considered to be created thatway and, therefore, they come underbroader restrictions than any restric-tions they might otherwise come under.

Mr. VANDER JAGT. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentleman.

For the purposes of section 320(a) (1)(B) and section 320(a) (2) (B) that Icited, our committees are considered tobe created in that way but they are notconsidered to be created in that way uin-der any other sections?

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. The gentleman Iscorrect.

Mr. VANDER JAGT. Mr. Speaker, Ithank the gentleman very much.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, I yield1 minute to the gentleman from Ioywa(Mr. BEDELL).

Mr. BEDELL. Mr. Speaker, as thechairman of the commltte knows, I havebeen working to try to get legislationwhich would prohibit political candidatesfrom converting political contributions topersonal use. Such a provision was con-tained in the Senate bill, but it was de-leted in conference because of objectionsby the House committee.

I would like to know whether the gen-tleman generally supports the conceptthat we should not let political candi-dates convert political contributions topersonal use.

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, If thegentleman will yield, I think that gen-eral concept would be supported by theHouse. There were real problems in work-ing out the details in conference, espe-cially in cases where a Member was re-tiring and had a fund which he accumu-lated. The fund may have been accumu-lated about 2 years ago, and the questionwas: What do you do with it? It might bethought almost impossible to prorate itback to the individual contributors, espe-cially since some of them have no rec-ords as to whether they contributed, forinstance, another $10, and pending fur-ther study, we just could not come upwith an acceptable provision.

I do not fault the general idei. and Ithink that some day we will be able towork something out in this area.

Mr. BEDELL. The gentleman believes,the idea haz merit if we could get aproper provision drafted?

Mr. HAYS of Ohio. That is right.Mr. BEDELL. Mr. Speaker, I thank the

gentleman.Mr. HAYS of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, I yield

1 minute to the gentleman from Wiscom: -sin (Mr. OBEY).

Mr. OBEY. Mr. Speaker, as someMembers know, I have not been espe-cially happy with the section of this bill

S184

MaY 3, 1976113784

Mabig* 1976

provides that records rieed only be keptas to thle identity of contributors in ex-es&,; of $50.

The conference subtitute comiie.smany of the enforcemient provisionis con-tained in both the Senate bill and thle

House amendment, giving the FederalElection Commission ex painded and miore

varied civil enforcement powers. Asthese are described in detail in the coni-

ference report I will niot discuss themi at

this time. However, I would welcome any

questions my colleaguies might have withrespect to these enforcement provisions.

The conferees Pgreed to a modificationlof the advisory opinion procedures of thle

Commission. Ani advisory opinioli maybe requested by tiny Federal officeholder.any candidate for Federal office, anypolitical comluiltte,. , or the national comi-mittee of any political party, concerningthe applicationi of ii general rule of lawstated in the act, or the applicationi of a

general rule of law prescribed by theCommtiission is a r'tle or regulation, to a

sp~ecific factua'l situiation. Section 108kqaof the conifer-ei(ce bill prohibits the Coin -

,.,iss ion fromi proposing general rule of

h.w in any formi other th'min as a rule or,regulation pursttallt to the congl-ressional

.vview pr'ocedures of the act. General"'*ulernakiiig was never intended to be thefunction of thle advisorky opinion prioce Ss.

"71'h is section clarifies the intent of theCongress inl this resirect, and requires theI

^%,fommission to conform their prior ad-_V'isory opinlions to these provisions with-

,An~ 90 days of enactment.Thle contference bill prohibits opiniotns

of an advisory nature ether' than; pui'---- suant to the advisory opinion prlocedure.

The bill also expands those who wotuldhe able to rely, upon an advisory opinion

include any person involved ini anyspecific transaction or activity which is

"tidistingut-isiable in ill its miaterial as-pects from the transaction or activity

C"with respect to which the advisory opin-t'on is issued.

The conference substitute amends theC(iprocedure for congressiontal review of

Commission rtules and regulations byclarifying that Congress may disap-

Nrove any provision or series of inter-related provisions which state a singleseparable rule of law. The proposal inthe Senate biU shortening the reviewtime was deleted by the conferees, thusretaining the 30-legislative-day periodIof existing law.

With respect to limitations on con-tributions, the conference stibstitute isa fair compromise between the SenatEbill and the House amxendnment. A personas defined in the act, will be subject t,,the existing limitation of $1,000 per elecction per Federal candidate. As uncle!present law, earmarked contribution.,and contributions made to a candidate.authorized political comnmittees are con.sidered to be contributions to that candi'date. A person may also not make con.tributions to any political committeiestablished and nmaintained by a na,tional political party which in the aggregate exceed $20,000 in a calenclayear. A person is further prohibited f ronmaking contributions to any other political committee which in the aggregat,exceed $5,000 in a calendar year. Indi

S 6365CONGRESSIONAL IRECORI) - SENATE

viduals would still be subject to the $25,-000 apgregate limitation on aill contribu-tions; inl it calendar year ill existing law.

A mnultl('anidaite political committee,as defined in the act, may contribute atotal of $5,000 to at Federal candidateand his authorized political committeein any election campjaign. A multicandi-date political committee wotuld be lim-ited to ain aswgrcigate of $15,000 in a calen-dar --,ear whichi it could give to any polit-ical c'ommtittee of a national politicalparty a~nd to an ag!4regate of $5,000 In acolendar year it could give to any otherpolitical colitmittee. These latter limita-tionis, however, would niot apply to trans-fers between political committees of thlesaic political pat y.

lican or eortc entia

_ _19hii 13t V'jake a

a Eyear was

'1h te'provisions!' of the Senate billandi the H ouse nentlment relating tolimitations onl contributions and certainexpenditures were similar and are re-flected int the conference substitute.

Thle conference substitute also con-ta ins at f a ir comp1)romnise between the Sen-ate bill and the House amendment per-taiing to the solicitation by corpora-tion's i.cl labor organizations of volun-tary cont ributions to separate segregatedfunds. It follows tile structure of the Senl-ate bill, permitting corporations to solicitvolunta i'y cont ributlons from stockhiold-crs inad executive or administrative per-sonnel, and labor organizations to solicittheir members. The conference bill wouldclarify the definition of executive or ad-inistra tive personnel to include indi-

viduals employed by a corporation whoarc p~aid onl a salary, rather than hourly,basis andi who have policymaking, man-age rial, professional, or supervisory re-siponsibilities. Ini addition to the above,corporations, and labor organizationswould be able to solicit all employees andstockholders twice a year in writing bymail to their residences with the provisothat the solicitation be designed so thatthe party making the solicitation cannotdetermine who makes a contribution of$50 or less as a result of such solicitationand who does niot make such a contribu-tion.

Thie conference bill adopted the Houseprovisions giving trade associationsrights to solicit stockholders and execu-tive or adlministrative personnel of mem-ber corporations.

The conference report, at page 63*states as follows:

'MTe conference substitute follows th(House iunendinent with regard to the solicitation by aL trade assocition of stockholdenand exectiie or administratLive personae(and their families) of a member corporatioz:

*of suich trad~e 9.s-sociat ion. Tie, conferenci2subh titute contain.4 the provisioni of the Sen.ate bill permnitting a membership orgaiza

- tion. cooperative, or corporation without cuprital stock, or a separate segregated funirestabi ishsi byv such orgaizAtins. to soiici

contributions to stuch a funid from member-of ituch orgmni7atio'1. cooperati've, or corporaetion without capital stuck. lIn light of the fac-suibsection (b) (4) (D) governs solicit-ation

by a trade av.4ociation of the stockholdersand executive or asininistrative per%0onnel Ofa member organization, then the terin "mfeni-bership, organization" in subsection (b) (4)(C) L4 not intended to Include a trade a.'SCIOciation which 1:4 maude uip of corporationis.

A question has come up as to the puir-pose of the phraae "the term 'member-ship organization' In subsection (b) (4)(C) is not intended to Include a trade as-sociation which is made up of corpora-tionls."

First of all, this language was includedto preclude a trade association, which isalso a membership organization, andwhich desireus to solicit the stockholdersarid employees of a member corpurat1oll,from avoiding the limitations of 321 (b)(4) (D), which limit such solicitation tostockholders and executive or adininis-trative personnel of the member corpo-ration, and further provides that themember corporation must consent tosuch solicitation and only give its con-sent to one trade association in a calen-dar year.

Second. it applies only to trade asso-ciations with corporate members and isintended to regulate the solicitation ofthe stockholders and executive or ad-ministrative personnel of such corporatemembers. A trade association which is atmembership organization inay, ofcourse, solicit its other members, such asindividuals, partnerships, et cetera under321 (b) (4) (C).

In most other respects the provisionsof thle Senate bill related to corporateand labor union political action commit -

tees were ratalned, except the deflnitionlof stockholder, which was omitted, leav'-ing the interpretation of this termIi togeneral corporate law.

The conference bill contains limita-tions onl honorariums, increasing the ex-isting limit per speech from $1,000 to$2,000 and the yearly aggregate f rom$15,000 to $25,000. In addition, actualtravel and subsistence expenses for therecipient of the honorariums and spouseor aide as well as amounts paid or in-curred for any agent's fees or commis-sions are explicitly excluded from thehonorarium limitations.

Finally, the conference bill includesthe provisions of both the Senate billand the House amendment pertainingto the termination of matching fundsfor inactive Presidential primary eamn-paigns and the return of excess publicfunds not used to defray qualified cai-paign expenses.

In conclusion, this legislation correctsmany of the defects, inequities, and in-consistencies in the campaign financelaws which thle Congress and others haveobserved since passage of the 1974amendments. It clearly reflects theoriginal intent of the Congress in 197i1and 1974, and at the same time, restruc-tures the campaign finance laws. bothto give the Federal Election Corninis-

-sion more extensive and flexible civil-enforcement and regulatory powers, as-well as to provide for a more balancedSand equitable operation of these laws.

Mr rsdna hi eilto aMr rsdna hi eilto a

-been extensively debated in both House.-t of the Congreas, It is now of critical uin-9 portance that the Senate act exvedi-

101) 1

375

6~~~ reuaanL

8 ~trtin wi: "tiste olfres i then lv: 1That w i.; Cn

to rc.in the intent, ofl tis calendar yc rtillinLL

10 y a Is tho're Obi cat-ion to those- three cxln to s E 'j t11

CS12

Page 4 9 thIere. c has beear -I subs-tittei- 0-opoe.

I~ I ~ Ir VWi (mJ.n S Is it your uiktarngtha thell,(;o

15

a m:elctonbaisor p;E:r Cai~aebssin a clid- er

C.17 Pera~ a noi calemndar Year.

Mr. IC~9~fl. ~i -i 1>(h-

Chal rmcin Cairir.o r.~ao 1.1 : (-r-e I t that by L

2 0 9 t h c -~ 5 , 0 0 0 C p e c r e lc 1 c - t io ,n t o c s t i T

21 ~Mr . 1*1imiins. ilowa Jzcl ~, ZPr. Cl lairlman, toe ac rbL) ' 2 to he Seatebet:they ~it: to1Cl1eared uII. But 1-oriolt toyiv!~1I L00 .1-1 -er (il~-

23 year17 by Ithe ,3W ll-t:()iAOl C n:i) om e c~ ~ ~ t-h-a .j

24 ]. ilit the r igli t of ot-hcr nat .iolial. oii :!e to (jive 00?25

m

37(;

Is that a U" a] 1. r ero 'iI tl 5000 pe

2 'l(cc[ icm -For the_ other c~n~a

3 ma ano T t o;not a f [actL the- ]7.cjht:- ofohe

4 tchlf.LCC5L bre ale~ to am ye whatcvel: Nvo hai-.ve. rvd~ '11l

5 thelc':1

6 Mr. Wi(j:ins . Per elec 1-ion.

7Cha-.-irman Cu-inon. Per elc o.Oly Ipi. , to the(

8 secified committees under the statutLe.

Mr. Wiggins. If the Senators are clear tha-t there is no

10 cgiqlt, then T don't have. any problems.

11 Chairm.An Cannon. We are, satisfj.ezd.

12 ~M r . W.1g g i is All right.-

13 Senlator Scott. Y'ou sidthe $17,500 is por election

14 t

15Chairman Cannon. No. Per calendar year.

16S en at o.-, P el. Mr. Chirado-s this mean pereeco,

or I mean prcandi date par year? W1hat if there is a caucus-17

is or primary e]action?

CiiI~umnCannon. Which one are you tal.king about?19

20 e n atL Pail.1.) xipcnciture, the $'117,5F00.-

21Chiairmani Cannon. No, it say-s por yeLar,. pero~ caleldiar

22

23Sc1,011 ai. ISf theA(re'- are L"..'o ciAe:[:.i c w1, il- would r.IE

beP 1. ii.-ited?

3 7

1 Cliairiin (Ini-oli. Still- lixidted to t~izit ficjurc,.

Somebod -;d rooal her-~ for this rew~rite ofth

e~onf~encere"port on pagje 49 aido 50 --tar Ling at. thle h to

Do, o everyboly have a cop.:y of thfat lookin ,t it?

5 Mr. Shoener. T1hec re -ro- sevrl eldi frnt ones.

Chairmein Ilay-. Will you d~~ rb tthe docuiment.s?

7Chairw*Zm11n Cann1-on. The confererice n i u that I he cI

here wa-s one that 3: understani wa(oId u yth tf

of01 the H~ouse and the Senate.. is that correct? On the

10 Majority side. The other sub.-stitute was workzed out,'L by s~~v

11 on the Minor1ity side. Suppose we go througjh the Mlajority

C4staff Substt.L-e and take a look at it- and then wo w-.ill pce(

12

14 ~ Does every,,bccdy hitve the copy now: so they, can read it?)

Mr. Don i. Loo: cat the top of page3 nembership15

organizations, it doe-s not include o r w as i n Len GI e to i ncl1.ude

a raeassociation. Most tradie a.ssociations are miade up oy-17corpo rat i.on. That is whtth-y are doing, is r cTpr ese~

col: poorations i ]Vihn that particula._,r trade ~s activities.19

ChiranHtays. Whe1c.re 'isth?20

Mr. lalis;.I don'tL think so.21

2MLr. DentL. It--Is your: amenncdm1en.t. If you)L thi.nk .it' s all11) ri~ 1: ,:i. L's ol Oey w;ith me:!

2 3CI i(- irnik. An I1tc o It say I. tc 11 :ite da o lil

w'hiEch .i whLat: he! w.mLed to do0, e;]ulait.25

I 04FEDERAL. ELECTION COMMISSION

1325 K S I ki I IN.W.WASHMNG I ON,1.. 2046

MEMORANDUM TO: CHARLES STEELE

FROM: MARJORIE W. EMMONS

DATE: APRIL 19, 1979

SUBJECT: OBJECTION - MUR 820 -General Counsel'Report dated 4-16-79; Received inOCS 4-17-79, 2:42

The above-named document was circulated on a

48 hour vote basis at 4:30, April 17, 1979.

Commissioner Friedersdorf submitted an objection

at 9:23, April 19, 1979, thereby placing MUR 820 on

the Executive Session Agenda for Wednesday, April 25,

1979.

April 17, 1979

MEMORANDUM TO: Marge Emmons


SUBJECT: MUR 820

Please have the attached General Counsel's Report

on MUR 820 distributed to the Conmission on a 48 hour

tally basis.

Thank you.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMJMISS'tON!,




In the Commission 's first consideration of this matter,

it found reason to believe that the National Republican Sena-

torial Committee (NRSC) may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) by

making expenditures in connection with the Senatorial Campaign

of James Martin of Alabama in excess of the S44la(d) limita-

tions published by the Commission. The Commission 's published

calculations for party spending limits for Senatorial contests

limit the national and state committees of the Republican Party

to spending no more than $62,506.94 each on behalf of a Republi-

can candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama. If the National

Republican Senatorial Committee acted as the authorized agent

of both the National Republican Committee and the Alabama

Republican Party, its total spending limit on behalf of Candidate

Martin's Senatorial campaign was $125,013.88. NRSC reported

a total of $196,355.85 in §441a(d) expenditures on behalf of

the Martin campaign.

In response to questions submitted by the office of


-2 -

1) Letters from the Republican National Committeeauthorizing NRSC to make S44la(d) expendituresin connection with the Martin campaign -


2) Agreements with the Alabama Republican ExecutiveCommittee authorizing NRSC to make S44la(d)expenditures in connection with the Martincampaign -


3) Affidavit of Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer, NRSC,in which Mr. Smith states that he supervisedand directed the expenditure of §441a(d) fundsin connection with the Martin campaign as au-thorized by the Republican National Committeeand by the Alabama Republican Executive Committee.Mr. Smith further stated that such expenditureswere made "properly and in accordance withCommission Advisory Opinion 1978-19."


S44la(d) expenditures in connection with the Martin campaign.



Sparkman Senate Seat (el) and $122,985.30 to the Martin Camn-

paign for the Allen Senate Seat (S2)- Mr. Martin was a can-




separate §441a(d) expenditure limits to the two Martin races.


in connection with Sl, as authorized by the Republican National

-3 -


$123,000 in connection with S2 as authorized.

LEGAL ANALYSIS


to a request made by the Fraser Senate Committee concerning the

application of FECA to transfers between principal campaign

committees for Candidate Fraser in his campaign for two separate

Senate races. The Commission noted that

[tihe Act specifically permits, and exempts fromcontribution limits, the transfer of funds fromthe principal campaign committee of a candidateseeking one Federal office to the principal cam-paign committee of the same candidate who seeksanother Federal office. 2 U.S.C. S44la(a) (5) (C).





Advisory opinions rendered by the Commission apply a


§437f(a). And any advisory opinion rendered by the Commission


(a) any person involved in the specific trans-action or activity with respect to which suchadvisory opinion is rendered; and (b) any per-son involved in any specific transaction or ac-tivity which is indistinguishable in all itsmaterial aspects from the transaction or acti-vity...

2 U.S.C. §437f(b)(2). See also 11 C.F.R. §112.5.

-4 -


campaign committee for S, could properly rely on AO 78-19


committee for S2, that being "indistinguishable in all its


NRSC's expenditure of § 441a(d) funds in connection with

Martin's Sl and S2 campaigns would seem to be materially

different from transfers between two principal campaign

committees.

Tr The question then becomes whether, absent AO 78-19, as

precedent, NRSC could successfully interpret the language

of the statute, 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d), to impose limitations

on party coordinated expenditures in connection with general


C01% connection with general election campaigns of specific


S441a(d) spend up to $122,000, as authorized by RNC and

AREC, in connection with the Sparkman Senate seat and

$123,000, as authorized, in connection with the Allen

Senate seat even though James Martin was the Republican

candidate supported by NRSC in both races. Or was NRSC

limited by S 441a(d) to spending no more than $122,000,

as authorized, in connection with James Martin's Sena-

torial campaign whether that be for the Sparkman seat or

the Allen seat.

- 5 -


regard. Section 441a(d) imposes limitations on expenditures


candidate for Federal office." 2 U.S.C. S44la(d). This



races or in connection with Federal candidates. The Commission' s

regulations do not assist in this matter. 11 C.F.R §110.8.

Therefore, the Office of General Counsel recommends that

the Commission take no further action in connection with the

National Republican Senatorial Committee's possible violation

of 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) since the statute is not explicit on

whether the expenditure limitations apply to Federal candidates

or to Federal Senate seats. The Commission will want to

consider this matter fully in drafting a new Regulation prior

to the 1980 elections. However,the Commission's decision to

take no further action in this matter should not be read as

an adoption of NRSC's interpretation of the statute.

However, it is clear that coordinated party expenditures

under S44la(d) are limited to expenditures "in connection


was held on September 5, 1978, with a Runoff on September 26, 1978.

-6 -

The Commission's (E) Index shows NRSC expending $3,000 in

coordinated expenditures on July 19, 1978 and $25,000 in


journal entries show the 7/19/78 amount of $3,000 charged

to the National Party limit and the 9/1/78 amount of $25,000

charged to the State Party limit. If these expenditures were

in connection with the Alabama primary or runoff election

rather than in connection with the general election, they

would not be allowable under 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d). In addi-

tion, since the only dated letters of authorization to NRSC

were a letter from the Republican National Committee dated


tive Committee dated August 22, 1978, the 7/19/78 expendi-

ture would seem outside the scope of S 441a(d) as NRSC was

not the "designated agent" of the RNC at the time of the

expenditure.

Therefore, the Office of General Counsel recommends that


violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by reporting expenditures made in

connection with the Alabama Senatorial primary, and made

prior to the time NRSC was the designated agent of RNC,

as coordinated expenditures under 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d),

11 C. F. R. S 110. 7(a) (4) .

-7 -

Finally, NRSC reports one coordinated expenditure of

$50,000 made on October 2, 1978, the day that James Martin

switched his candidacy from the Sparkman seat to the Allen

seat. NRSC's journal entries allocate $28,458.63 of this

amount to the Allen Senate seat campaign and the balance to

the Sparkman Senate seat campaign. The Office of General

Counsel recommends that the Commission seek further details

from NRSC concerning this expenditure, e.g., the purpose

of the expenditure, the method of determining the allocation

of the expenditure to S 1 and S 2* Therefore, the Office of

General Counsel recommends that the Commission approve and

send the attached letter and interrogatories.

RECOMMIENDAT IONS


Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)'s possible violation

of 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) in connection with the Senatorial cam-

paign of James Martin of Alabama.


Senatorial Committee may have violated 2 U.S.C. § 434 by re-



designated agent of RNC,as coordinated expenditures under

2 U. S. C. § 4 4la (d) , 11 -,C-.F. R. S 110. 7 (a) (4) .

-8-

3. Approve and send the atta d letter and interrogatories.

Willial Counsel

Attachments1. NRSC Response2. Letter to Respondent and Interrogatories

LAW OFFICES

MERL R.JENINSJENKINS, NYSTRhOM & STERLACCI, P.C.MERLEI . JNY'SO 2033 M STREET. N.W. OF COUNSEL

MICHAEL A. STEniLACCI WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20036 JOHN 8. CONLANEDWARD A. RYDERCARL F, SCHIER

JOSEPH E, JANNETTA (0 9. 0JAMES F, SCHOEN -R (012320 .,MICHIGAN OFFICE-)STEPH-EN J. HITCH-COCK (15999i WESTo TWELVE MI.LE ROADCHRIS M. PARFITT SOUTHFIELD, MICHiGAN 4eOa76GARY J. NYSTROIM Jaur 0I 17 33)5922RONALD A. DENEWETH Jaur ,17 (1)5922TIMOTHY J. MULLINS

Kathleen Imig Perkins, Esq.Office of Genieral CounselFederal Election Commission

* 1325 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20463

Re: M U R820

Dear Ms. Perkins:

alk Enclosed you will find the affidavit of Mr. Rodney A. Smith, treasurerof the National Republican Senatorial Committee concerning expenditures and

If) contributions to the two Martin for Senate Committees. As is apparent from11 r the last part of the affidavit, Mr. Martin-resigned from his' candidacy for

the Senate seat of retiring Senator John Sparkman (Class 2, United StatesOV Senate) in October 1978, and was tl.Lreafter nominated to run for the seat

left vacant by the untimely death of Senator James Allen of Alabama (Class 3,United States Senate). A similar situation had previously occurred inMin-nesota and Advisory Opinion 1978-1) to Congressman Fraser was studiouslyfollowed to give direction for such a change in candidacy.

Tha affidavit should show our compliance with the requirements of thatAdvisory Opinion and I attach hereto copies of assignment and allocationagreements of the National and State Party comm~ittees authorizing our acting

0 as their agent in each of these Campaign committees.

I will be glad to furnish any further information or documentationneeded to indicate our compliance in this matter, and ask that before any-further action is taken that we be given an opportunity for a conference oranswer further questions in writing.

Respectfully, /11

James F. Schoener

JFS :cel

Eric losures

P. S. I also enclose a coTpy of the review1, by Stan Iluckaby, the C.P.A. who'checked the items mentioned in the Roiney Smith affidavit.

* epublican..: \J:' ationa1Committee

September 5, 1978

The Honorable Bob Packwqood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatoria Corniittee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWqashington, D. C. 20002

Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for the, purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S44la (d) (3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee, in connection with thegeneral election campaign of James Martin of Alabama.

Undler S441a (d) (3) youCommittee's behalf, up

may spend, on the Republican Nationalto $10,000 for Mr. Martin.

B~est personal regards.

Very truly yours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen Cot tenChar-lie BlackJaccuie NystromrVatt ;,1irgauJay Banning

Dw.v ,,h t D. tflsernh o wer --clDut Iicpn Cn r:310 Firs-t 'Strppt qri t hopzt Ar - ( '\)9.\A

.::.RepublicanNationalCommitteeBill Brock

Chairman

The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Nassachusetts Avenue, NE

* Washington, D. C. 20002,

Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for'the purpose

__ of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3).. YourCommittee is. authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Reopublican National Comnmittee, in connection with thegeneral election campaign of Senate Seat 1, Alabamaand is in addition to our letter of Sept. 5, 19.78, in theamiount or $10,000.

Unjder S44la(d) (3) you may spend, on the. Republican NationalCommittee's behalf, an additional $52,000 for 1-r.

lar --in, brincin:,g the c -uuative total. to $62,000.

0 Best per-sonal regards.-

Very truly yours,

-. BILL BROCK

CC*. Blob Moore- Ben Cotten

* Charlie Black* Jac!-ui e N v s tro m

Jay Banning

Dwihtfl Eseo~~rRe~cc~ Ci~r:31l lr? ~1S~?~~rt ~A~~r nr~r f ( ~PY ~*n

Rep ublicanNationalCommitteeBi1l Bra~ck

ChaIrman

Th.- Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002

Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthc National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Commtrittee, for the purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a (d) (3)-. YourComitrLiLtee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalf

%0of general election campaign of Senate Seat 2

qT UiiClr S441a(d) (3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCo1-ni' "tee's behalf, uto$0000 for Mr. James Martin, of

-~Alab-ama

.B(2s-' nersonal regards.

VVery/7rl yours,

BILL BROCK

01 B E/bh-n -

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJac7guie Nystromn

-Jay BanningKenny lKlinge

Dwight D. Eisenho~wer Rcoubfj~an Center: 310 First Slrcet Scuthenst. WsitoD C. 11rO13. =M2 ~c~

~.:"-3epiublican.Tht-onalCommitteeBill Brcck

Chairman

*The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002

*Dear.Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senat,-orial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for the purpose..of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC. S44la(d) (3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalf

o--he Republican National Committee, in connection with theqoneral elect-ion camr-aign of Senate Seat 12.and is in addition to our letter *ir the amount of $60,000.

41 Under, S44la(d) (C3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCo::irittee's behalf, an additional 1.1,000 forMr

1llen , briniging the cumiulative total to $61,000.

Be:st personal regards.

Vrtruly yours,

N - BILL BROCK

cc: B.ob- Moore-Ben C cttenCharlie BlackJaCcuia- Nystromjay BanningEAcny Klinge

0'.-vight D. P-eDub I i!-- an C -ntLr- 3", - :7;,, -f Sti S it?* h VY:-,s 'I m,74 -,r D.C,

\'ep'ublican.:.:ational

6CormitteeWgih~m D. Harris, State ChaIrmanMember tor AlabamaP.O. Box 3315Sirrnoh3m. Alabama 35205(2Q~ r53

AGREEMIENT BETWEENTME NATIONA.1 REPUB3LICAN SENATORIAL C=-11I'T-,E

AND THE ALABAA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMI4Irr1'EE

The National Reoublican senatorial .COrrhittee, hereinafter known as "Senatorial", agrees*with the Alabama Republican Executive Corr1mittee, hereinafter known as "4Statk-e"1; as follows:

1. Under the nrovision of 441 a(d) (3) of Title 2 of the United States Code, State(and i-ts subordinate committees') may make certain expenditures in connectionwith the general election campaign of the candidate for the office UnitedStatcs Senator for the State of Alabama.

2. Such amount of allowed expaenditures under said provision hasbeen comoutedtentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amount of $62,507.00.

NC 3.-hat StCate wishes to designate Senatorial its agent for the purpose of making....... such oxnenditures up to the amount of $60,000.00.

-~4, StLate agrees to file an allocation statement concerning the amount not assignedto Se2.at--rial as req~uired by the Federal Election Cornmissi.Dn Regulation 110. 7()

5. St'.ate acre es to carry out the provisicns of such allocation statement and will0 ~promol,--y advise Senatorial at any time tha': State a-nd its subordinate corrnit'tees

!rOeach S-0 of the amount*C retained by State 'and a review ofl this acreement. willoccur at such time.

6. Senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf; of candidate, or if it isany manner unabDle to make such exnenditures, to promptly release and ca-ncelsaid agency and reassign such allocated amount to State.

This acreemet signed the date opposite the respective parties' name to be effecZlvewnen sigcned by both -arties.

National Repulblican Senatorial Com:-sittee

Datd9~2~, I ~ 1973 at By~ Po

Title (v4/_S ~ _

Alaba-ma .::uulican Exec.uti.ve Commnittee

~J K Th-$K'1< ~ 1973 at By 1j/i-'~~

T. _Itle C hnii =a~n

I

(1

.RepublcanNationlIcommitteeVWjjiliam D) Vlarrir,. Statec ChairmanMember for AlabamaP.C. Box 33115Birminll1 rm, Alabami 35205J205) 322-5733

-I'

L.'

(AGREE!4ENT BETW,%EEN

TH-E NATIONA,%L REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMM2I TEE

AND T71E ALABAMA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COZ.21MITEE

The Nat' I'Onlal ReP'Tlican Senatorial Commnittee, hereinafter known as "Senatorial", agrees

with the Ala*ba~ma Reoublican Executive Corrittee, here inafLter known as "State"; as follows:

1. undeor the crovision of 441 a(d) (3) of Title-2 of the United States Code, State

(and its subordinate co.=mittees) may make certain exoendit-ures in connect-ioni

W ith the special general election campaign of the can-lidate for the office Uie

States Senator for the State of Alabama unexpired term Place 1"2.

p 2. Such am_-ount of allowed expenditlures under said provision has been computed

tentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amou~nt of $62,507.00.

3. That St~ate wishes to designate Senatorial its aqent for the pur-pose of rnakRnc _

such ex-aenditures up to the amount of $62,000.00

4. State acre'2s to file an allocation stateentC concerning the amount not assir7&Qe

Pto Senatorial as required by the Federal Election Comission Regulation 110.7(c)

5. Sa agrees to carry out the provisions of such allocation statement and wl

n-rc7 t iv advise Senatorial at any time that Stat,4e and its subordinate cmite

reach 60%, of the amount reta-ined by St~ate an eiwo hi gemnC

occur at such time.

6. senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf of candidate, or if itsis-

any ma-nner unable to makj-e such expenditures, to promptly release and cancel

said agency and reassign such allocated amount to State.

Th's aq cemnt signed the date opposite the

wh'en signed by bot-h p)arties.

D a tI.-d: d- 1970 at

W-Vashiincgt_-n, D. C.

ta te

ir-ugc:n ~ m19,73 at

respective partk-ies' name to be effective

National PRepulican S~natcria1 ol 2 e

By___

Title -' "LJ---______

Alabamna Rleo,_uhlican Exe cutive Com0. tt1.

Title C Ina ran

9iPLiJuanciaL CSJELW 4CU,,

* ~~901 £c'fJt £PtaZO Cznfi&, S.1'qWalf-ngton, 2 ).C. 20024

.Rn JYucafy VL am1.2Cijf

1~- 202/ 554-46*19 VuwCia nU.' in3 SrC_ S

October 17, 1978

Rod SmithNational Republican Senatorial Committee

227 'vnssachusetts Avenue, NE

Washington, DC 20002

- Dear Rod,

Pursuant to our conversation of last week, I am submitting the

folloving figures to the National Republican Senatorial Committee con-

"ZI cerning your limitations on the Jinm Martin For Senate Committee.

Ps you know, Mr. Martin has changed candidacy for election to the

- United States Sentate, and, therefore, under the law, is entering a new

election. In accordance with Advisory Opinion 1978-190, we have made

an allocation of the "coordinated expenditures" mads by the National

Republican Senatorial Committee between the first senate race and the

second senate race. Of the $100,000.00 in coordinated expenditures that

you have madea, $70,170.55 has been allocated to the first senate campaign,

and $2.8,458.63 has been allocated to the second campaign. The remaining

balance of $1,370.82 is presently being refu~nided to you by the vendor.

Using A.0. 1978-19, all of your contributions '($17,500.00 maximum) made

c~. to the first senate campaign are non-allocable to the second campaign.

Therefore, that limit will begin again. I understand that you have rade

1%. subsequent contributions to the second senate campaign, and those amounts

should be added to the $28,458.63 in determining the total amount re-

maining for coordinated expenditures in the second senate campaign. A

detailed ex.planation for this allocation has been telecopied to you

by the7 Jim Ylartin for Senate Campaign Committee.

All allocations have been made based on the exact amounts of in-

voices given to us by vendors. Should any of these amounts have a slight

variation, we will immediately notify you as to the effects they have

on your limitation.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions

concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

Stan Puckaby C

SF.: t =b


Before the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the rnatitcr ofNATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE M.U.R. 820

AFFIDAVIT

City of Washington

District of Columbia

Rodney A. Smith, being duly sworn deposes and says:

That he is the duly appointed treasurer of the National

Popublican Senatorial Committee of 227 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.,

Washington, D.C.

II

That as such treasurer he supervised and directed the making of

contributions as allowed by law to Republican candidates for the office


III

That-in such capacity-donations of cash (or in-kind) were made to

James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat) from July 11 through August 17th,

19.73 in thle amnount of $16,493.27 as is shown in our internal records,

a co,_ry of which is attached as Exhibit A.

That in such capacity donationes of cash in the amount of 517,000

were made to James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) on October 6th and

an in-'kind contribution of use of video egu'ipment of $300.00 made on/about

October 26th as is shown by our internal record~s, a copy of which is

attach-ed as Exhibit B.

V


allowed under the provisions of 2 U.S.C.-Section 441a(h).

VI

That in such capacity he supervised and directed the expendit-,ure

of funds in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat), as

authorized by 2 U.S.C. 441a(d) and as assigned to the National

Republican Senatorial Committee by Republican National Committee.

Vl Said exnenditures in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seatt)

are shiown in the attached E-.xhIibit- C.

CON VII

That in such capacity hie supervised and directed the expenuciL1ire %.o~

C


Co!mmitoe by the Republican National Comimittee. Said expenditures in

behalf: of James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) are shown in the attachied

Exh-ibit D. As shown in said Exhibits C and D, a credit for funds or

rct~erials trans-ferred from James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat) to

James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) in the amount of $28,458.63 was

ma~ce on October 2, 1978.

an on-site review of credits of cash and in-kind contributions

transferred from the first commuiittee to the second.

XII

Further deponent saith not.

Rodney A/ SjnithTreasur , National RepublicanSenatorial Commaittee

svSrn to .Lnd subscribed before me a notary public in and for the

o)istri-et,9 PCulumbia this /~day of January 1979.-

Notary,yubllcMy commission expires______

VIII

That he is informed and believes that such agency agreements

are proper and correct and that the same were in accordance with

Commission Regulations # 110.7 and Advisory Opinion 1976-108.

IX

That he supervised an~d directed the expenditures for James Martin


as were assigned by allocation agreements from the Alabama (State)

Republican Executive Committee, such expenditures being shown on the

0aforesaid Exhibits C and D.

x

That he is informed and believes that all such transactions

wcemade properly and in accordance with Commission Advisory O.iniOll

CI 1973-19 "Contributions to Two Campaigns by One Candidate" made in

connection with the Fraser for Senate Campaigns, and that the

Mar1tin Campaigns are indistinguishable in all material aspects from


- XI

Tphat in order to make sure that all proper credits were made

f'or cash- or credits transferred from the Martin Committee (Sparlkman

seat)to the MNirtin Committee (Allen seat) , the National Republican

Senatorial CoramLittee required a certified public accountant to make

. - -

.02

AA_ TliIIHii i

I ~ (~4I I I

ii I I

_____ II 11tH ~ T I i ,011111 'II ii 1

1t I 17 I I I I'I124 IHili i .11

13 _

1

2, 7

10 -1 71M__

.k~W~wr. ~ *'~~ -, .

.IL- IL-

I '~

it-

cA~j2~E~ ~JitTV

I It

r -lqL(C 'A~~E gj

n _ii- ____*=1__- - -~.---- -

g -I I

JF I I I ,I K I to

______ _____ I

IIIII LIII

II II I III .1,1,1 a II I iii

I I

FT1I ___ ~

II')OLD.

I j * _________

I!

___________________________ Jj . 2 t 1-

_____ - ~- -- i - -m -

it Ii I 17

I I-J I i I i 11 1 4

Ii II

II

~113

Iis

1117

A19

!21______ 22

____ l lt II 27

128II _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t i l t'' 1 1 1K ~_ i _

____ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____I ' __ ____ __ __0II I ii _______________________.31_

II -**-.-.*-----.------ Ii _ _ _ _ _ _.__ __ _ - - ~~ I,____ _ __ ____ _33

IT-___________

.35

II -

iiI,

ItIiI!iIIlii:j~ I ~II

iiIi

4'

*~ * * *~ - * 9 1..Ii I. *I* I, I I I I'_______________________________________

___________ -I------I 'i, I I~I _________ *I.___________ * I! ______________________ *, - *I -

* I ii

36

.43

___ ___ i!r~I~L.

it

it

A/ C kSC 5(c

36

S.2 -3

... . AM (_M 0_.-7__/

thaZ- Ii e5EjA 11! -1

10

eI eiI ii I III III I II ~427Li2

___I 4

I;- i-call

- .~. I IIH ~f.m7II

Ih KHT

liii ii ~lIII1'- IIIIIIII;IIIIII

II~~~ ~~ i 1J I~ J iI I __ II

211IF II 111 I I

251II n 'lll l 11 I i l_____2_ _ 6.IIlii_ _ _ _ _

29____________ I I~ ~~Ii

30* ltht i iI II IItl31 i __ ii fJ

253.4I i t I35______ I il ____

38

39

'I

I II I

I . ____________ . 1 1- . 1-----

-- ~

I 'II -1 4 .*4 I-

- I - _ I _ _- I

______ ______ ______ j ______ I

I I , It.

A

4.~: ~ -~ -

I A- AIsc7~!L~) ~ ~ '~

il h~J~A J~ IA-. AIfI__

____I ___ I' __I________F A I iI KI I_

IT_ I I 1 rL 11 1 11

F I ___I

___0_ 0 H~I2____ 5I H___

_____ / Ii T30_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ 1.......i.i.i..... I i l ! I

33 ____ _______________Ii

/34J~'--I~'K~ ! C. _ __ _h

39 i __________________________

B 1o7II ______________

'I

L~Lrjj~jzj~±jj~:IiI


.W I I I 1.25 K S IRH I N.W.WASHINGION,D.C. 2046.1


Mr. James F. SchoenerJenkins, Nystrom & Sterlacci, P.C.2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

The Commission is continuing its investigation inthe above-referenced matter. In this regard, theCommission, on April , 1979, found reason to believethat the National Republican Senatorial Committee mayhave violated 2 U.S.C. S 434 by reporting expendituresmade in connection with the Alabama Senatorial primary,and one said expenditure made prior to the time NRSC wasthe designated agent of RNC, as coordinated expendituresunder 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d), 11 COFOR. S 110.7(a) (4).

Attached is a set of interrogatories, answers towhich will assist the Commission in resolving thismatter. The interrogatories relate to the fact thatNRSC has reported two expenditures, one of $3,000 onJuly 19, 1978, and one of $25,000 on September 1, 1978,as S 441a(d) coordinated expenditures. The Alabamaprimary was held on September 5, 1978 and the date ofthe first letter of authorization from the RNC wasSeptember 5, 1978. In addition, the Commission isseeking further facts relating to the $50,000 expendi-ture made on October 2, 1978, part of which was allo-cated to the Sparkman Senate seat campaign and part tothe Allen Senate seat campaign.

0 U 10A

-gf zfm

0 0

Mr. James F. SchoenerPage Two

Please answer the attached Interrogatories andreturn them to the Commission within ten (10) days ofyour receipt of this letter. The attorney assigned tothis matter is Kathleen Imig Perkins, (202)523-4175.Please contact Ms. Perkins if you have questionsconcerning MUR 820.

Sincerely,


Enclosures

INTERROGATORIES - SCHOENER - MUR 820


July 19, 1978, reported as a S441a(d) coordinated







S44la(d) expenditures) as of July 19, 1978?


September 1, 1978, reported as a S44la(d) coordinated


campaign of James Martin for U.S. Senate.




6. What method was utilized to allocate part of this expenditure


7. Were any media materials) developed using Sl NRSC coordinated

expenditures) utilized in the S2 campaign? If so, was an




D* RLAD

REPRTS ANALYSIS REFERRAL UPDATE

O0RJGJN: GC

DATE JawI'/~17 ANALYST Dug Greevy

TO: Office of General Counsel TEAM CHIEF Peggy Sims Pie SA-.

ATTNTON KthyP--DnsCOMPLIANCE REVIEWTHROUGH: STAFF DIRECTOR T

FROM: ASSISTANT STAFF DIRECTOR FOR REPORTS ANALYSIS ~ &MUR No. s c DATE OF ORIGINAL REFERRAL IQi1 "07 t

**PURPOSE: At the direction of the Commission, the Reports Analysis Division sent

the National Republican Senatorial Committee-Expenditures several Requests for

Additional Information asking for clarifications regarding the committee's reporting

of in-kind contributions on Schedule B, Line 22(c). The committee responded and a

telephonic conversation was initiated by this Division regarding that response. Pleasesee previous Update.

Iti response to the conversation of 2/28/79, the committee submitted on 3/13/79 amendmenits

to the August Monthly through 30 Day Post-General Election Reports, These amendments

are here attached.

OUTCOME: (if applicable)1. Committee reported as in-kind contributions several coordinated expenditures.2. Committee reported as operating expenditures several in-kind contributions, Fntries

were made under both Line 20 and Line 22(c) The notations therefore of in-kind

contributions made to non-incumbent senatorial candidates, as reported on Line 20,were reported as well on Line 22(c). However, several of these in-kind contributionsshould have been reported as coordinated expenditures, and these have been correctedwithin the amendments.

3. An expenditure, reported on Line 20 with the notation of support for Durenberger,which did not appear on either Line 22(c) or Line 24, has been allocated asa coordinated expenditure made on behalf of Durenberger in the amount of $128.25.

4. An expenditure, reported on Line 20 with the notation of support for Durenbergerhas been corrected to show support for Cochran. This entry previously supportedan entry on Line 22(c) indicating an in-kind contribution made to Cochran, but thishas been corrected to indicate that a coordinated expenditure was made on behalfof Cochran in the amount of $8,929.80.

Note: The Data Base presently includes these corrections.*Commission unit which initiated original Referral (e.g. AUDIT/RAD/OGC).

"*INFORMATION, or RESULTS OF PAD ACTION, as appropriate.

-mor Bob Packwood

chuimm. Oegom

UUMA

mmjam IL Oidee. ft. Lgi B@ oiiw d

Mo~ .atm L sgh. UtahW&n &. L Hayma11. CUL"M I. Jom" 3kb. DL lFernft,. Cho MCC. mhimif.. ULd4Mn WM V. Sutb. Jr. DIL

.. 3k..SkoK PL K.%, Rhbid L. SobWI&k. 1 01111

Sa. 3bot T. td%94. VeimostUMor Lr. T o& IL Dub.

VA ~.A. 3Skb

Senatoill i~mm ittee

flatioflt RepUBlican eao ilmite

'19 MAm I5 P14 12~ 6

March 13, 1979

Mr. David GreevyFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20463

Dear Mr. Greevy:

In response to your letter dated January 29, 1979, con-

cerning the October 20 Monthly Report, and the 10 Day Pre

General Report, we are enclosing revised schedules of In-Kind

Contributions and Allocated Expenditures shown as memo items

on Lines 22(c) and 24 respectively of Page 2, FEC Form 3 for

the August 20 Monthly Report.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free

to contact me.

Sincerely,

RTodn ey SS1 Sm i thTreasurer

RAS: lecEnclosures

227 Massachuwits Avenuec. N.IF. a Wa%iinw'on. 1).c. 20002 * (202) 224-2351

"A capv of our Fix~OI t i ied wsili hOw I hed I 10. t.oer Citaw oll~ J1141 it .1vi.adaI1ia fo~r gau~tI~ lca rho11 f fifal Liection Canurrssson, Washington. D.C."

/ DETAILEDSVIMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXP EWURES(Page 2, FEC FORM 3)

NAME OF CANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE National

Republican Senatorial1 Committee-Expenditures

RECEIPTS

14i. Contributions from Individuals (including contributions in-kindl:Ia) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....Wb Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c Sales and collections included above:

List by event on memo Schedule D IS_________

1d) Subtotal of contributions from individuals... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....IS. Transfers from Political Committees:

(a) Funds from affiliated/authorized committee (Itemize on Schedule Aregardless of amount).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..............

(b) Funds from other committees (Itemize on Schedule A regardless of amount) ....(c) Contributions in-kind from political committees

Itemnize on Schedule A regardless of amount)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Wd Subtotal of transfers in and contributions in-kind from political committees ....

16. Other Income:(a) Itemized (use Schedule A). .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

(b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c Subtotal of other income........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

17. Loans and Loan Repayments Received:(a) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....1b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

k5 Ic) Subtotal of loans and loan repayments received.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....18. Refunds, Rebates, Returns of Deposits:

tr (a) Itemized (use Schedule A) .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .(b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

"rt (c) Subtotal of refunds, rebates, returns of deposits.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

NI.. Total Receipts. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

fil. EXPENDITURES

,&0. Operating Expenditures:(a) Itemized (use Schedule B). .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ......

(b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ic) Subtotal of operating expenditures.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Loans, Loan Repayments, and Contribution Refunds Made;(a) Itemized (use Schedule 8).... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .(b) Unitemnized...... ..... . . .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...

22.(c) Subtotal of loans and loan repayments made and contribution refunds .. .. .. .Transfers Out to Political Committees:(a) To aff iliated/authorized committee (Itemize on Schedule 8 regardless

of amount).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...................(b) To other committees ( Itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .(c) Contributions in-kind to other committees MEMO

(Itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .(d) Subtotal of transfers out...... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

23. Independent Expenditures (use Schedule E)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .*. .. .. ..24. Coordinated Expenditures Made by Political Committees (2 U.S.C. 44 1a Id))

(Itemize on Schedule F).... .. .. . . . . . . . . ,TOTAL . ,,,,7.1.O.c

25. Total Expenditures..... ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

REPORT COVERING THE PERIODFROM: July 1

I 1Column AThis Period

TO: July 31, 1978

Column BCalendar Year-To-Date

S............

$

SS

$ . . . . . . . . . . .

$ S

S .$

S S

S S.. . . . . . ....

S S

RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES,NET OF TRANSFERS TO AND FROM AFFILIATED COMMITTEES

26. Total Receipts (from line 19 ........................................ S _______________

27. Transfer% In (from line 15(a))........................................ $

28. Net Receipts (Subtract line 27 from line 26)..............................$ _ __________

29. Total Expenditures (from line 25)...................................... S____________

30. Transfers Out (from line 22(a))...................................... S

31. Net Expenditures (Subtract line 30 from line 29)...........................S

&E8

'Po., 1978

,at Election Commission

K Street. N.W.

9sngton. D.C. 20463

I*MIZED EXPENDITURES(Operating. Transfers out. Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repay... ants and Refunds Made)

Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22cof FEC FORM 3

paop 2.L of 2..?... forLine Number 22 (c)

(Us@ Selparalt Schedules for

each numboered line)

_ _ _--__ _ _ I a_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ *_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

IName of Candidate or Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-Expenditures

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure

Steven Saunders In-Kind Contribution

Nat'1.Republican Senatorial CommThurmond Committee-Si

227 Massachusetts Ave., N.E. Media Consulting

Washington,D. C. 20002 Expenditure for:171 Primary flCGeneral

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code

Mary mower

NatllRepublican Senatorial Comm,

227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E.

Washington, D. C. 20002

'Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code

Bob Gabordi212 Union Street

Providence, Rhode Island 02903


~Sandra Carlson212 Union Street

Providence, Rhode Island 029031

-Re-electo.Carolina

03 Other

Particulars of Expenditure

In-Kind Contribution-Reynld5

forC U.S. SeaRhdisand

Expenditure for:01 Primary lrt(eneral [3 Other

Date (month, Amount of each expendi-

day. year)

June '78

Dae(mnh

day, year)

June '78

ture this period

ture this period

58.50

Date (month, Amount of each expendi.day, year) ture this period

7-28-78 20.00

Date (month, Amount of each experidi

day, year) lure this period

7-28-78 20.00

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure IDate (month, Amount of each expendi-

Eleanor Danforth In-Kind Contribution-Re-eleCtI day, year) ture this period

%Nat'l.Republical Senatorial Comm.Thurmond Committe-O Crlna

227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E. lrc June '78 30.00

Washington, D. C. 20002 Expen iture for:o Primary fl(General 0 Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date imonth, Amount of each expendi-

Tony Pay ton In-Kind ContributiOfl'Shasteel day, year) ture this period

1127 Independence Ave., S. E. for Senate - Nebraska 750

Washington, D. C. 20003 Political..Consultinp,-- July '78 750Expenditure for:

o] Primary D(General [0 Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure I Date (month, Amount of each expendi-

Tony Payton In-Kind Contribution-Simpson i day, IYear) ture this period

1127 Independence Ave., S. E. for Senate - Wyoming

Washington, D. C. 20003 Cnj Itin2Juy7850.00onriary ~JGeneral 0Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars ot Expenditure I Date (month, Amount of each experdi

United Airlines In-Kind Contribution -Helms dayr)tethspro

Dept. 745711 for Senate - North Carolina

P. 0. Box 36022M Air Trn" July '78 181.00

Pitsbugh Penslvnia 15250 Expenditure for:Pittsburgh PcnyaPrimary K)General 0QOther

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... .... MO- SUBTOTAL ... 44.5

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .... MEMO TOTAL .......... 1 1,988. 69

r-1 Primary XVGeneral 0 Other

I

I

15.00

.g3.0

~,alii Election Commission3 25 K Street, N W.

Waeshington. DC. 20463

Name of Candidate or Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial

* ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES(Operating, Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kmnd,

Loans. Loan Repayments and Refunds Made)Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22c

of FEC FORM 3

Commi ttee-ExpendituresFull Name. Mailing Address and ZIP CodeChristopher D. Lord5401. Westbard AvenueApt. #1507Bethesda, Maryland 20016


Christopher D. Lord5401 Westbard AvenueApt. #1507Bethesda, Maryland 20016

b Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP CodeChristopher D. Lord5401 Westbard AvenueApt. #1507Bethesda, Maryland 20016






Christopher D. Lord*5401 Westbard AvenueApt. #1507Bethesda, Maryland 20016

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code

James SchoenerJenkins,Nystrom & Sterlacci,2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP CodeCommunications Corporation ofAmerica

#1 Direct Marketing PlazaBoston, Virginia 22713


In-Kind Contribution-Committe6P. or Sen. Griffin - Michigan

fEpenditure for.(Primary XOCGeneral 0Other

Date (month.day. vear)

June '78

Particulars of Expenditure j Date (month,Tn-Kind contribution-People day, year)for Boschwitz - Minnesota

nr 3jTgS(crj71-pe Jn 7Expenditure for: Jn 7C0 Primary M General 0D Other

1 1,539.1.9TOTAL this period (last page this line number only) .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... ... ... .... .. ... ... ... ...

paoe i- of 2 forLine Number 22(c

11-se6 Separate Schedules foreach numbered line)

Amount of each e>xpendi.lure this period

400.00

Amount of e,ich exviendi-ture this Period

219.19

SUB3TOTAL of expenditures this page (optional) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... MEMO SUBTOTAL-

In-Kind Contribution-Venema

for Senate-elampshre

Expenditure foro Primary fl(General 0 Other


In-Kind Contribution-Masellofor Senate - NelwHampsir

Expenditure for

o Primary XGeneral QOtherParticulars of Expenditure

In-Kind Contribution-Humphreyfoe Senate -Newahr

h eeajcjruj-ipcesE-xpenditure for:

a

*,.Election CommNison

K Stree1t. N.-. 00ngton, D.C. 20463

Tnese are memo Items only and are alsoshown on Line 20(a) as expenditures

ITEMI 4COORDINATED EXPENDITURES OE BYPOLITICAL ARTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNAT E3AGENT(S)

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE(2 U.S.C. 441a(d))

(Supporting Line 24, FEC Form 3)

I (To be used only by Political Committees; in the Geneual Election)Name of Political Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresHas your Committee been designated to make coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? )(IYES NIf YES, name the designating committee: ReprublIican Nat ionalI and/or Respnective State Comi tteesFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date im1orath. Amount

- of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ______________ day. year)

All-In-One Travel Roger Jepsen .. ~,".600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E United States Senate * ' 'Washington, D. C. 20003 Iowa Air Travel July '78 $ 157.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditure______________________________ for this Candidate -- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Nam;e of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day. year)I

All-In-One Travel Thad Cochran600 Pennsylvania Ave.,S.E. United States SenateWashington, D.C. 20003 Mississippi Air Travel July '78 157.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditure -

_______________________________ for this Candidate - S _____________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ______________ day. year) ________

All-In-One Travel Rudy Boschwitz600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E United States SenateWashington, D.C. 20003 Minnesota Air Travel July '78 157.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditure -

_______________________________ f or thisCandidate__ -- _____________ S_____

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particular. of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day, year) ________

James Schoener YJenkins,Nystrom & Steriacc:.Larry Pressler2033 M Street, N. W. United States Senate. 7/'Washington, D. C. 20036 South Dakota Legal Services July '78 200.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditure________________________________ for this Candidate -- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day. year) _______

James Schoener 7''2Jenkins, Nystrom & Bob GriffinSterlacci, P. C. United States Senate

2033 M Street, N. W. Michigan Legal Services June '78 600.00Washington, D. C. 20036 __________

Aggregate General Election Expenditure A51for thisCandidate_-_ S_____________

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this E i.e (optional).... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............................................ MEMO - SUBTOTAl. I ) ,7 1.. .00TTLtipeidIatpg' mber only) . .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... . ..

Page 1....o

For Line 24. FEC Form 3

TOTAL this period llast page v

I shown on Line 20(a) as expenditures

ITEMIZ ORDINATED EXPENDITURES 1E BYPOLITICAL P RTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATE GENT(S)

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE(2 U.S.C. 441a(d))


(To be used only by Political Committees in the General Election)

pae 2 ~of 2

For Line 24, FEC Form 3

Name of political Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresHas your Committee been designated to make coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? 1YES (3NO

if YES, name the designating committee: Zeul-in Ntoa- Respective State CL __________

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of ;)enditure Date imonth, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ______________ day, year) I _______

James Schoener KJenkins, Nystrom &Bo Grfi

Sterlacci, P. C. United States Senate

2033 M Strect, N. W. Michigan Legal Services June '78 1,600.00

Wahntn D . 206 Aggregate General Election Expenditure 7'./for this Candidate -- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year) ________

w"(James Schoener -

V- Jenkins, Nystrom & John Tower

TO Sterlacci, P. C. United States Senate

w 2033 M Street, N. W. Texas Legal Services June '78 1,200.00

~' Wahingon, D C. 0036 Aggregate General Election Expenditure K.

for this Candidate - S_____________ ___ _______

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amnount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, ear)

C~James SchoenerST Jenkins, Nystrom & Larry PresslerSterlacci, P. C. United States Senate

S 2033 M Street, N. W. South Dakota Legal Services June '78 400.00

p.,. Washngto, D.C. 2036 Aggregate General Election Expenditure .

for this Candidate -- S______________ ______ _ ________

N. Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day. year) ________

Aggregate General Election Expenditure

for this Candidate - S_______________ _____ ___ ________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _____________ day, Year) _____

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefur this Candidate - S ________________

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .... MEMO .S.1.1'.0.TAL . .$ 3,200. 00

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only)....................................... MEMO -TOTAL.......~ $4,471 .00

,eion'~ Commnission

d0109ton . o.C. 20483

flatonal RepuBlican Senatorn , fiittee

mAVoftb Fackwoodhosu. Ofwon

"OA IL mbe r-equaea IL (hke. L. L

04111 OIS G. Hack. Utaham & L Ibyhowli CWILSim . H.jam "Nb NI. Num.%~M 011110411 MC. MAthieti Jo..1 Milea.wI V. 5ai. Jr. DALam Ibu ht abt, H. K.

tom. Dabnd S. SchAvr P..s.im Rebut T. taffIcd Vuumle

0426 M. IL Yw& 14. Dub.

Rebary A. SUMi

March 13, 1979

Mr. David GreevyFederal Election Commission

1325 K Street, N. W.


Dear Mr. Greevy:

In response to your letter dated December 22,

concerning the September 20 Monthly Report for the

covering August 1 through August 31, 1978, we have

the following:

1978,periodenclosed

a. Revised schedules of In-Kind Contributions and

Allocated Expenditures shown as memo items on

Lines 22(c), and 24 respectively, of Page 2,

FEC Form 3.

'CON.b. Schedule C, showing the debt owed to the National

Republican Congressional Committee as of August 31,

1978.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter,

please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Rodey ..Smith

Treasurer

RAS:lecEnclosures

227 M smictts Avenue. N.IF. *Wishington, D.C. 20002 * (202) 224-2351

"A copv of out irstogo is fiviti wmtos vote I stories I Iristi ,.~1 .o -midl is avdiltil too guscitt fitUit the I ad".,.a It Ie.1.w. Comission, Washington, D.C.

U

AMENEDREP O RE EITSAND EXPENDITURbjams~ A CANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE

offlilSUPPORTING CANDIDATE(S) FOR',,..o~o~tm55aflNOMINATION OR ELECTION TO FEDERAL OFFICE

* ~~street, N.W.O .C. 20463 (lExcept for Candidates or Committees Receiving Federal Matching Funds)

Note: Committees authorized by a candidate to receive contributions and make, expenditures in connection with more than onie elec tion must maintainseparate records with respect to ech election.

7National Republican Senatorial Committee- 2 I.D.No. C00027466Name of Candidate or Committee (in full) ,Expenditures Candidate/ Committee227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E.3Address (number and street)OfieSuhSa/Dsrc(faplab)Washington, D. C. 20002OfieSuhSaeDsrc(faplab)

City, State and ZIP Code E3 Check if address is different than Previously reported. Year of Election

4 Type of Report (check appropriate boxes)

o Tenth day report preceding electiono April 10 Quarterly Report (primary, general or convention) 0 Termination Report

o3 July 10 Quarterly Report on __________in the State of _______3____ Amendment for:

o3 October 10 Quarterly ReportC3 Thirtieth day report following election (which report)o3 January 31 Annual Report (primary, general or convention)

M(Monthly Report A119guaq.t on _________in the State of06 (month) (date)

4' This is a report for [3 Primary Election 03 General Election 03 Primary and General 03 Other (special, runoff, etc.)

SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES(Figures may be rounded to neares dollar.)

5 oern Prod Agut1 houh Auut 1) 98Column A Column 85 Cverng erid A gus 1 hrogh tigst 1, 978This Period Calendar Vear-To-Date

6 Cash on hand January 1. 19 .. .. .. .. ... ... . . . .................... $

54 7 Clash on hand at beginning of reporting period. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... $

8 otl eeits(ro ln 1)........................... .. . ......... I.s ........

(a) Subtotal (Add lines 7 and 8 for Column A and lines 6 and 8 for Column B)......$ s

9 Total expenditures (from line 25). .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. . .. . .. . .. . ... $ $

10 Cash on hand at close of reporting period (Subtract line 9 from line 8a)... .. .. .. . . . .S

11 Value of contributed items on hand to be liquidated(Attach itemized list) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ________ . .

12 Debts and obligations owed to the Committee /Candidate (itemize all on Schedule C) . . .$

13 Debts arid obligations owed by the Committee /Candidate (itemnize all on Schedule C). . 45,000.00

1 certify that I have examined this Report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and comp t~c

9-20-78 Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer ~~>(Date) (Typed Name of Treasurer or Candidate) (Signatureg Treasurer or Canidi ,,

Note: Submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete information may subject the person signing this Report to the penalties of?2 U.S.C. Section 4379,or Section 44 1j (see reverse side of form).

For further KFederal Election CommissionAprvdbGOinformation. 1325 K Street, N.W. or call 800/424.9530 Approved b GOfiContact: Washington, D.C. 203463 Expires 3-31-81

All previous versions of FEC FORM 3 are obsolete and should no longer bc used.

Any information reported herein may not be copied for sale or use by any person for purposes of soliciting contributions or for any commercial purpose.

IU WINIMU WUflf ME IEU

(tP 2, FEC FORM 3)/

A-#1 OF ANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE% ational0,~.publicnl1 Senatorial Committee-Expenditures

RECEIPTS

114. Contributions from Individuals including contributions in-kind):I (a) Itermized Just Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....I (b) Unitemnized...... ..... . . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..I (c) Sales and collections included above:

I List by event on memo Schedule D (5( Id) Subtotal of contributions f rom individuals.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

1 15. Transfers from Political Committees:(a) Funds from affiliated/authorized committee (itemize on Schedule A

I regardless of amount).... .. . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..I (b) Funds from other committees (itemize on Schedule A regardless of amount) ....

(c) Contributions in-kind from Political committees* (itemize on Schedule A regardless of amount)..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .

* (d) Subtotal of transfers in and contributions in-kind from political committees .

116. Other Income:* (a) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

(b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..,,.Ic) Subtotal of other income........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..V.Loans and Loan Repayments Received:

.~(a) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....(b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..f c) Subtotal of loans and loan repayments received.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

I Refunds, Rebates, Returns of Deposits.(a) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....(b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c) Subtotal of refunds, rebates, returns of deposits.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

. .Total Receipts.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

EXPENDITURES I20. Operating Expenditures:

(a) Itemized (use Schedule B). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .....(b) Unitemed..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..11(c Subtotal of operating expenditures.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

21. Loans, Loaf, Repayments, and Contribution Refunds Made:C ~ (a) Itemized (use Schedule 8).................................

(b) U nitem ized ............ .............................10'(c Subtotal of loans and loan repayments made and contribution refunds .. .. .. .

22. Transfers Out to Political Committees:( (a) To affiliated/authorized committee (itemize on Schedule 8 regardless

of amount)..... ... . ... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..I'm(b) To other committees (itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .

(c) Contributions in-kind to other committeesItemnize on Schedule B regardless of amount). .. .. .. Mema .t~m......

(d) Subtotal of transfers out......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..123. independent Expenditures (use Schedule El.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .24. Coordinated Expenditures Made by Political Committees (2 U.S.C. 4Alald))

(itemize on Schedule F) . N.. emQ .TQtal .-. .$. 1,6.73..82 ..........

25. Total Expenditures.............................................. 5


26. Total Receipts (from line 19)........................................ S

27. Transfers in (from line 15(a))....................................... S

28. Net Receipts (Subtract line 27 from line 26)..............................S

29. Total Expenditures (from line 25)....................................$S

30. Transfers Out (from line 22(a))...................................... $

31. Net Expenditures (Subtract line 30 from line 29).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ...

I REPORT COVE &ERIOD I hFROM: August I

Column AThis Period

TO:August 31. 1978Column S

Calendar Year To4Date

$

$ .. . . . . . .

S .. .. .S.$

S .. . . . . . .

$_ _ __ _ _ $

S .. . . . . . .S . . . . . . . . .. .. ..

S S

$ .. . . . . . ... . . . . . .

4 . .94263..22..

S SS __ _ _ _ _ _

$ S

I I

I...................

_____________________ I -u'-www I

..~,1976,d,aa Election Commission

.12S K Street. N.W.

Vgshington. DC. 20463

t#TEMIZED EXPENDITURES IOprting. Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repay, aents and Refunds Made)Supporting Lines 20a, 21a. and 22a, 22b, and 22c

of FEC FORM 3

paoe 1 of 1 foar

Line Number 2 2 n

lWse Separate Schedules foreach numbered line)

Name of Candidate Or COM111itt& in Full


Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount of each expendi-

Communications Corporation of In-Kind Contribution-Griffin dayyar) ture this period

AmericafoSeae-Mcin#/1 Direct Marketing Plaza Co trwr 8/21/78 $ 729.63

Boston, Virginia 22713 Expenditure for: [ te

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount of each expendi.

United Airlines In-Kind Contribution-Helms day, year) ture this period

Dept. 745711foSeae-NrhColnP. 0. Box 36022M Ai ae8/7/78 265.00

hr~Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250 Expenditure for:0 Primary ___General [3 Other

C' Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.

United Airlines In-Kind Contribution - day, year) ture this period

Dept. 745711 Boschwitz for Senate -

P. 0. Box 36022M Minnesota - Air Fare 8/7/78 206.00

'Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250 Expenditure for:0 Primary IGeneral [Q Other ______________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Patclr fEpniueDate (month, Amount of cacti expendi.

'A a eknyto &telacci, P.C. In-Kind Contribution-Griffin day, year) ture this period

2033 M Street, N. W. for Senate - Michigan

Washington, Do C. 20036 T.P-gnl qrvireq 8/21/78 1,848.78Expeniditure for:

[3 Primary [3 General QOther ____________ _____________

__ Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount ol. each expendi.

'~Federal Express Corporation In-Kind Contribution-Pressler day, year) ture this period

2900 South Eads for Senate - South Dakota

6 Arlington, Virginia FpesdlieySrto 8/7826.31

Q) Primary fl(eneral C] Other

~> Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure # Date (1month, Amount of each expendi.

Roger Ailes & Associates In-Kind Contribution-Reynolds day, year) ture this period

230 Central Park South for Senate - Rhode Island INew York, New York 10019 Mpdint Critiqgte- 7/12/78 1,187.50

Expenditure for:o] Primary [RGeneral 30Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, iAmount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0D General C] Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, jAmount of each expendi.

day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0 General 0) Other

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ..... S

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... .. ... .. MEMO TOTAL . 4,9263. 22

OL I F

"V 197St,,,.. emirsso

*,KStreet. NW

.,t~fgof. D.C. 20463

These are Memo Items onlY.

ITEMIZE' qOORDINATE D EXPENDITURES M BYPOLITICAL PA9TY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATE DOENT(S)

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE(2 U.S.C. 441 a(d))

(Supporting Line 24, F EC Form 3)


Page IL of -1


Name of political Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresNai your Committee been designated to make coordinated expenditures by a political party committee?

If YES, name the designating commfittee: T cpihl i rtin NMifion.-il and/o ReRci

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Ntame of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of

-of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought -___

Communications Corporatio i-of America#1 Direct Marketing Plaza

Boston, Virginia 22713

Howard BakerUnited States SenateTennessee


for this Candidate .- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported,

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought

Jenkins, Nystrom &Sterlacci, P. C.

2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Codeof Each Payee

Jenkins, Nystrom &Sterlacci, P. C.2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

TIae(mnh

John TowerUnited States SenateTexas


for this Candidate -- $

State, District & Office Sought

Larry PresslerUnited States SenateSouth Dakota


for this Candidate -- $

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported,


Jenkins, Nystrom &Sterlacci, P. C.2033 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Ed BrookeUnited States SenateMassachusetts


for this Candidaite -- $ _________

_________________t_______ I TJ.Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code


~J y~ I~I I'd~.J

~e State Committees

-7,j7

Computer Work

Legal Services

"'1 7

I Particulars of Expenditure

Legal Services

/7'


Legal Services


r-~ ~ ~~dy year)1Ton mon

8/7/78

day, year)

8/21/78

Date (month,day, yea r)

8 /28/78

Date (month.day, year)

8/30/78

Dat (nionth,

day, year)

$ 185.00

1. 308 . 82

Anmoount

60.00

Amount

120.00

Amo0unlt

Aijgrc'jatei General Election E xpendituore

I ~ for this Candidate -- $

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this pae (otional).... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .................

TOTAL this p~eriod (last page this line nuimber only) .....................................M O-TOTAL- $ 1 ,673-82

U T"i

AniountI

K"day, year) I

/oo .r. '.o'.

______ I Ij~C

la Icti' commissionKC Street. N.W.

4ashoneto". D.C. 20463

0 DEBTS AND OBLIGATIONS 4Supporting Line Numbers 12 and 13

of FEC FORM 3

(Indicate Primary or General Election for each Entry)

fP -I of -4.. for

Li.~e Number 1JL3..

(Use Sepaerate Schedules foreach numbered line)

Name of Candidate end Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-Expenditures______

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month. Amount of Original Cumulative Outstanding

National Republican Congressional day. year)I Debt. Contract. Payment Balance at

Comittee Agreement or To Date Close of

512 House Office Building AnnexPrmsThseioWashington, D. C. 20515 1977

nl Primary 13 General 0 Other $75,000.00 30,9000. 00 s45,000.00

NATURE OF OBLIGATION (Details of Debt):

~. Loan Re payment

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month, Amount of Original Cumulative Outstandingday. year) Debt, Contract. Payment Balance at

Agreement or To Date Close ofPromise This Per iod

101 $S0 Primary 0 General UOther$$$


Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month. Amount of Original Cumulative Outstanding

i.day. Year) Debt, Contract. Payment Balance atAgreement or To Date Close of

Promise This Period

13 Primary LI General 03 Other S $S


SUBTOTALS this period this page (optional) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ................ S .S

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 7 5, 000. Q 30,000.00, "45,*000. 00

Carry outstanding balance only to appropriate line of summary.

national RepuBlican Senato)0i3lThtt66

19 N~f 15 P14 12: 17

Nmom - I aha.Ji. Tom& ac 1 ,17

.mjeha IL Omafe. ILL Mrh1,17

4M. oi 0. match. Ufth

.f & 1. hyoo iflo. Qlam

,amwam V.RoA X eLMr. David Greevykpf HaiuM s mkt. N4. K.

%m ~wdS.Sdrv~. hA-Federal Election Commission%m abe T 3ff0A VmSm 1325 K Street, Northwest__ eoLVo&? I Washington, D. C. 20463

steditiy A. go"1Tammva

Dear Mr. Greevy:

In response to your letters dated December 22, 1978 concern-

ing the September 20 Monthly Report, and January 29, 1979 concern-

ing the October 20 Monthly Report, and the 10 Day Pre General Report,

0 we have enclosed the following:

(a) Schedule "C", showing the debt owed to the National

Republican Congressional Committee as of September 30,

~1978

(b) A revised copy of Page 16 of 23 of Line 20(a).

(c) Revised schedules of In-kind contributions and allocated

expenditures shown as memo items on Lines 22(c), and 24

respectively for Page 2, FEC Form 3.

IF, All items relate to the September 20 Monthly Report.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter,please

do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,~

Rodney A. SmithTreasurer

RAS:lecEnclosures

227 Masihmust Avenue. N.F. 0 Wa%hington,DI.(. 20002 * (20)2) 224-2351

"A coiv tit owa I"%"I is I Igl weIt Iola I "le A I ew Ifon Cn..ilt%,i11.1114 . A1.1..I It it Igg ill 6-1.1w I..I. ti t wI@ a I attt mc it ComniniOflo. Wahemlof. 1) C",

I ~-.- IREPORT OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES ilL: IsI4 A CANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE W

Sto?$ I PP RTING CANDIDATE(S) FOR ItkoE.II If.EI$'IONflco omsinNOMINATION OR ELECTION TO FEDERAL OFFICE C~~~u

K~ Street. N.W. I..,,ngtf. D.C. 20463 (Except for Candidates or Committees Receiving Federal Matching Funds)

5r.D.

Note: Committees authoied by a candidate to receive contributions and make expenditures in connection wih more than oeve onms'~iti

separate records with respect to each election.

,National Republican Senatorial Committee- 2 I.D.No. C000127466Name of Candidate or Committee fin full) Expenditures

227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E.

Address (number and street)


City, State and Z IP Code

Offlice Sought, State/District (if applicable)

03 Check if address is different than Previously reported. Year of Election

4 Type of Report (cheCk appropriate boxes)

o Tenth day report preceding election

0 April 10 Quarterly Report (primary, general or convention) 0 Termination Report

O Jiuly 10 Quarterly Report on ____________ in the State of ___________0 Amendment for:

O coe 0QatryRpr Thirtieth day report following election (which report)

o January 31 Annual Report (primary, general or convention)

UCMonthly Report ,SP-2emIber on _________in the State of___________(month) (date)

This is a report for 0 Primary Election 0 General Election M)trimary and General 0 Other (special, runoff, etc.)

SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES(Figures may be rounded to nearesi dollar.)

________ Spt. 30Column A Column B5 Covering Period Sept. I Through Sp.3,1978 This Period Calendar Year .To-Date

6 Cash on hand January 1. 19 ............. ..

7 Cash on hand at beginning of reporting period ......................... S

8 Total reeipts (frm.line.19)..................... . . . . . S.

(a) Subtotal (Add lines 7 and 8 for Column A and lines 6 and 8 for Column 8) ...... S S

9 Total xpenditres (frm line...........................................

10 Cash on hand at close of reporting Period (Subtract line 9 from line 8a) ......... . S S

11 Value of contributed items on hand to be liquidated(Attach itemized list) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... S _____

13 Debts and obligations owed by the Committee /Candidate (itemize all on Schedule Cl . . . S 250 .0

12 Debts and obligations owed to the Committee /Candidate (itemize all on Schedule C) ... S 250 .0

Icertify that I have examined this Report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is Ire etand ope.

Oct. 20, 1978 Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer "0

(Date) (Typed Name of Treasurer or Candidate) (Signatur V f Treasurer or Candidate)Z

Note: Submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete information may subject the person signing this Report to the penalties of?2 U.S.C. Sect ion 4379,

or Section 44 1i (see reverse side of form).

For further Federal Election Commission Approved by GAO

information, 1325 K Street, N.W. or cal 800/4249530 B.187620 (110506)

Contact: VWashington, D.C. 205463 E xpires 3.31 .0

All previous versions of F EC FO0R M 3 are obsolete and should no longer be used.

Any information reported herein may not be copied for sale or use by any person for ourposes of soliciting contributions or for any commercial purpose.

%off'101011191 %.'On'111111194

0 ETILE SMMRY F ECIPT AD EPENDIURES(Page 2, FEC FORM 3)

'iltiOF CANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE 'T3t ionaj.,,,,~janSenatorial Committee-Expenditures.

REPORT COVE'G THE PERIODFROM: Sept. 1 ToSe

1C

pt. 30, 1978

RECEIPTS

t.Contributions from individuals (including contributions in-kind):(a) itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....lb) Unitemied . .. .. .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ic I Sales and collections included above:

List by event on memo Schedule D (S ________I

Id ISubtotal of contributions from individuals... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....1 5. Transfers from Political Committees:

(a) F unds f rom af filiated/authorized committee ( Itemize on Schedule Aregardless of amount).... .. . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

1b) Funds from other committees Itemnize on Schedule A regardless of amount) ....(c Contributions ,nnlcind from Political committees

(Itemize on Schedule A regardless of amount)..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .(d) Subtotal of transfers in and contributions in-kind from political committees ....

116. Other Income:(a) Itemized (use Schedule Al........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. *.. .. .. .. ..(b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..1c) Subtotal of other income....... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

'WLoans and Loan Repayments Received:(a) itemized (use Schedule Al........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

'CD lb) Unitemized...... ..... . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .03I (c) Subtotal of loans and loan repayments received... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .

"IS. Refunds, Rebates, Returns of Deposits:('Y (a) Itemized (use Schedule A)........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

r ! (b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..17 (c) Subtotal of refunds, rebates, returns of deposits.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

WYTotal Receipts..... ..... . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...

0 EXPENDITURES

2&. Operating Expenditures:,. (a) Itemized (use Schedule B) .. .. .. .. .. ....... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .

( b) Unitemized.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ..............

2 (c) Subtotal of operating expenditures .. .. .. .. .. .. . ...............2A1.. Loans, Loan Repayments, and Contribution Refunds Made:

(a) itemized (use Schedule B)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ................1b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c) Subtotal of loans and loan repayments made and contribution refunds .. .. .. .Transfers Out to Political Committees:(a) To affiliated/authorized committee (Itemize on Schedule B regardless

of amount)..... ..... . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...14b)To othet committees (Itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .(c) Contributions in-kind to other committees

(Itemize on Schedule 8 regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .. . . .mMO....(d) Subtotal of transfers out.... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .

23. Independent Expenditures (use Schedule E)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....24. Coordinated Expenditures Made by Political Committees (2 U.S.C. 44a(dl))

(Itemize on Schedule F)........ MEMO TOTAL. $25,586..05 .......

25. Total Expenditures..... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

Column AThis Period

Column BCalendar Vear-ToDate

S $

$$$ S

S . ...............S

$ S

S ... ...........$$ i s

$.$

S S

.S$ ...............S S

$ ...............$ ...............

$...........60.677S SS __ _ __ _ _

$ Is


26. Total Receipts (from line 19).........................................$

27. Transfers In (from line 15(a))........................................ $S

28. Net Receipts (Subtract line 27 from line 26)..............................S

29. Total Expenditures (from line 25). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ......

30. Transfers Out (from line 22(a))..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........

31. Net Expenditures (Subtract line 30 from line 29) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... SI________________________

I

I I ____ ____

commission

oDC. 20463

(indicate Primary or General Election for each Entry)

DEBTS AND OBLIGATIONS

Suporting Line Numbers 12 and 13of FEC FORM 3

Name Of Candidate and Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-Expenditures______

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month. Amount of Original Cumulative Outstanding

National Republican Congressional day. year) Debt, Contract, Payment Balance at

Committee Agreement or To Date Close of

512 House Office Building Annex Promise This Period

Washington, D. C. 20515 1977

~ Pimay [Genral0 OherS 75,000.01 S 50,000.006 $ 25,000.00


Loan repayment

Full Namne. Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month. Amount of Original Cumulative Outstandingbday. year) Debt. Contract, Payment Balance at

Agreement or To Date Close of

Promise This Period

D Primary N General L3 Other S S S

--- NATURE OF OBLIGATION (Details of Debt):

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code of Debtor or Creditor Date (month, Amount of Originalt Cumulative Outstandingday. year) Debt. Contract, Payment Balance at

Agreement or To Date Close ofPromise This Period

0Primary ~ 2General Other S S $

NATURE OF OBLIGATION (Details of Debt).

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only) .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ... S 75000 0O4 S 50,000.od S 25,000.00

Carry outstaningt balance only to appropiiate line of summary.

Page of . f or

Line Number 1

(Use Separate Schedule$ forech numbered line)

0

_______ I I

I iii~on commission

D.C. 20463

FName Of Candidate Or Committee in Full

w tailona. Republican Senal

11a0e 16& of .223 forLine Number-2 aq EMIZED EXPENDITURES

(Operating. Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repayments and Refunds Made)

Supporting Lines 20a. 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22cof FEC FORM 3

_______________________________________________________________ .1 ~

Committee-Expenditures

(Use Separate Schedules foreach numbered line)

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure IDate (month. Amount of each expendi.

5515 Livingston Road, S. E. Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate

Washington, D. C. 20021 Minnesota - S128.25]_________Expenditure for: 92-82000

O:)Primary [)General XKOther 9-67 2r900

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.day. year) ture this period

Expenditure f or:

o Primary [3 General E0 Other______________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi*day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:

o Primary 0General 0j Other_______________

LFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure ~Date (month, Amount of each expinriday, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:

O: Primary [3 General Q Other ________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expend,-


Expenditure for:

o3 Primary Q General Q Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.


Expenditure for:o Primary E0 General 03 Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date imonth, Amount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:O3 Primary 0 General 0 Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure i Date (month, iAmount of each expendi-

Communications Corporation of Direct Mail services day, year) ture this period

America Thad Cochran, U. S. Senate

#,1 Direct Marketing Plaza j Mississippi 9-27-78 8,929.80

Boston, Virginia 22713 Expenditure for: ICOt

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this patle (optional). .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ..

TOTAL this period (last Page this line~ number only)..... ... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... S

tcinCommissiont*Street. N.W.

D.,C. 20463

SEPTEMBER

& IZED EXPENDITURES

(Operating, Transfers out, Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repayi..ents and Refunds Made)

Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b. and 22cof FEC FORM 3

Pp - of - orLine Numbier - 22(c)

(Lise Separate Schedules for

eah numbered line)

Name of Candidate Or Comnmittee1 in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committe-Expenditures

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure

Rodney A. Smith In-kind contribution

4836 South 28th Street for Senate - Minneso

Arlington, Virginia 22206 ositne- QqExpenditure for:

r"Ui ma,,~ri, flGeneral


United AirlinesDept. 745711P. 0. Box 36022M

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250

_,Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code




-Durenbergta

0 Other

Particulars of ExpenditureIn-kind contribution - Helms

for Senate-North Carolina

Air FareExpenditure for:

o Primary )General 0 Other


Expenditure for:

o Primary [0 General Q3ather


Expenditure for:II

Pa Priar of Gxenitrl Ote Date (month. :Amount of each expendi.Patcuas fExediueday, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0 General [Q Other

Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount of each expeno'-

day, year) lure this period

Expenditure for:

0 Primary 0 General 0 Other ol, muto ahepni

Full Nm.Miling Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month.e Am thfisc perod'I day, year) lr hspro

rETxpenditjure for:

o Primary 0 General 0 Other ~. Amut lect xoni

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIDoePrtclrai xedtrday, year) ture this period

rExpenditue for:

o Prtimary'vo 0 (General 0 Other

SUB3TOTAL of expenditures this page (optional).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .....................

TOTAL this period (last page tilneumber only). .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ............. MMVO TOTAL..jS 606

shown on Line 20(a) as expenditures.2

ITEMIZEMOORDINATED EXPENDITURES M&PBYPOLITICAL PIWTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATE EGE NT(S)

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE(2 U.S.C. "I a (d))


(To be used only by Political Committee In the General Eleiction)

Pae 1 .of 3For Line 24, FEC Form 3

Njame of Political Committee in Full

Nqational Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresHas your Committee been desiqnated to make coordinated expenditures by a Political Party comtte flYES C1 NOIf YES, namu the desqnatinq committee: R psith ii cnr N.-it-onal aind/or Repcive Sate Committees _______

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date imonth, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _ ______________ day, year) _________

United AirlinesIDept. 745711 Nancy KassebaumP. 0.,Box 36022M United States Senate Air T v1Aug. '78 $305.00Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kansas -, ae

Aggregate General Election Expenditure .

for this Candidate -- S ______________

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of_________________ Each__________ _ dae ttDsrct&Ofc ogtcay._year) ________

The Postmaster Don Shas teenSU..S. Postal System United States Senate Posta~e Sept.'78 3j000.00

Nebraska

1*0Aggregate General Election Expenditure -

for this Candidate - S ________________________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ______________ day. year) _______

The Postmaster Bill ArmstrongSU. S. Senate United States Senate Postage,. Sept.'78 75.00

Washington, D. C. 20510 Colorado -

Aggregate General Election Expenditure_______________________________ for this Candidate -- S_______________________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ________________ day, year)

National Direct Mail - ,

Services, Inc. David Durenberger2233 Wisconsin Ave., N. W. United States Senate Postage Sept.'78 7,140.00

Suite #400 MinnesotaWashington, D. C. 20007 ',... '-

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate -- $

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _ ______________ day. year) _______

The Postmaster Thad Cochran7United States Senate United States Senate Postage Sept.'78 127.50

Washington, D. C. 20510 Mississippi 0

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate - S

.. . . . . . . . . . . . ........... EMO. SUBTOTAL.. $10, 647. 50

TOTAL this period (last page this -number only I.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

iCornn0sbon

.Oro". D.C. 20463

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this paqe (optional).........................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 $

IITEMIZED COORDINATED EXPENDITURES MADE BYPOLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATWGENT(S)

ON BE4F OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERA~ FICE(2 U.S.C. 441a(d))


(To be used only by Political Committe in the General Election)l

F N"me of Political Committee in FullNational Republican Senatorial Comimittee-ExpendituresHas your Committee been designated to make coordinated expenditures by a Political party committee, 'a YES (3 NO

IffYES, name the designating committee: p, pu I I c.i National and/or Respecctive State CommitteesFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Namve of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date Imonth, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day. year)

Automated Business Mail David Durenberger5515 Livingston Road, S. E United States Senate Typin services Sept.'78 128.25Washington, D. C. 20021 Minnesota :6

i /

Aggregate General Election Expenditure_________________________________for this Candidate - S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day. year) ________

Dorothy Jordan Associates Bill. CohenRoute 114 United States Senate Housing 9-1-78 1,500.00East Sebago, Maine Maine-

Aggregate General Election Expenditure_______________________________for this Candidate - S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Namne of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ________________ day, year)

Ronald Roberts Bob Griffin Political consult-8205 Bl1ome Road United States Senate ing & expenses

Cincinnati, Ohio 45243 Michigan et 789.5

Aggregate General Election Expenditure________________________________for this Candidate -- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year)

Ronald Roberts Charles Percy8205 Blome Road United States Senate Political consult-Cincinnati, Ohio 45243 Illinois ing & expenses Sept.'78 519.58

Aggregate General Election Expendiue -- ,

________________________________for this Candidate - SFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day, year)

Ronald Roberts John Tower8205 Blome Road United States Senate Political Consult-Cincinnati, Ohioi 45243 Texas ing & expenses Sept.'78 1,363.58

Aggregate General Election Expendiiure I -- Ifor this Candidate -- S

SUBTOTAL of exp~enditures this page loptional). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .... .. ... ... ... .... MEMO -SUBT{TAL, . .. $4 ,309. 96TOTAL this period (last page this line number only). . ... .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ..... $

0 C, 20463

Pag of


I-----------------~.- ~----------.------- ___________ I L *flJ I. LIJ L L~

3ITEMIZED COORDINATED EXPENDITURES MADE BYPOLITICAL fRTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATE AGENT(S)

ON BE . F OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAWFF1 CE(2 U.S.C. 44la(d))

(Supporting Line 24, FEC Form 3)(To be used only by Political Committe in the Geineal Election)

Name Of Political Commiteein Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresHas Your Committee been designated to make coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? UJYES pNO

If YES. name the desitgnatinq committee: Ri~iibl tiean National and/or Respective State CommitteesfFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (imonth, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year) ________

Communications Corporationof America Thad Cochran#1 Direct Marketing Plaza United States Senate Posta e Sept.'78 8,929.80Boston, Virginia 22713 Mississippi

Aggregate General Election Expenditure/_______________________________ for this Candidate -- S

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought ______________ day, year)

Rodney A. Smith Nancy Kassebaum4836 South 28th Street United States Senate FinanceArlington, Virginia 22206 Kansas Consulting and

expenses ug.'78 562.12

Aggregate General Election Expenditure - /

_______________________________ for this Candidate - S*Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amfount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day, year) ______

Rodney A. Smith John Warner4836 South 28th Street United States Senate Finance Consult-Arlington, Virginia 22206 Virginia ing,& expenses Sept.'78 568.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate .. $ ___ ___________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, Year)

Rodney A. Smith Rudy Boschwitz Finance Consult-4836 South 28th Street United States Senate ing & expenses Aug.'78 568.67Arlington, Virginia 22206 Minnesota .

Aggregate General Election Expenditure -7

_______________________________ for this Candidate .. S _____________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day. year)

_Ag9gregate General Election xpendiurefor thisCandidateS________________

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional)...................................... .EMO. SUBTrOTAL...... S 1.0,628.59TOTAL this period (last Page this line number. only)..................................... MEMO.-TOTAL......... $ 25, 586.05

R@W

Pagop ... of 3For Line 24, F EC Form 3

7

.2

Se"bor Dob Packwood

am ft N d H. main.Jr.. TOm.SM oha IL Chak.. L LSamy - eUwaiw. AALsam audN 0L flikh UtASm. SL L lkakhws. CaULfSm. IL Job. I-k - DU. FameSm 0hmB MCC fmohim. Jr., UL.Sam Wim V. Peuh. jr., DALS"a . - I -. 5hmt. K. ALSOL Awuid S. sihweiikv. Pea..,Sa Rebal T. Seafluid, VetemsittIm. Nb.. L. Yew&. P Dab.

Saey A. Sahli1111111111

'79 fT4A 15 P14 12: 16

March 13, 1979

Mr. David GreevyFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, N.t W.Washington, D. C. 20463

Dear Mr. Greevy:

0 In response to your letter dated January 29, 1979,0". concerning the October 20 Monthly Report, and the 10 DayJ~n Pre General Report, we are enclosing revised schedules of

ow, In-Kind Contributions and Allocated Expenditures shown asmemo items on Lines 22(c), and 24 respectively, of Page 2,FEC Form 3 for the 10 Day Pre General Report.

If you have any further questions regarding this matter,please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely

C. Rodney A. SmithTreasurer

RAS:lecEnclosures

227 Masctiwl Avenue,, N.. Wasi'hnw~on. D).C. 20002 * (202) 224-2351"A copy tit out triolit is ii. wwt lot#. f *,.k',,, I w.,:,)# ('wlilsil M 'N~ ~ ,ef. I ti iotalllIM h I fti l , ive'., I *'.ti.'. L lecio Cimorwn. Washo..gtoo. D C-

flatiolal Repumlcan Senatot..'"ttee

DETAILED SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPE NDJJURES(Page 2, FEC FORM 3)

W0NAME OF CANDIDATE OR COMMITTEE National

J geublcanSentorial Committee-ExpendituresRECEIPTS

14. Contributions from Individuals (including contributions in-kind):Wa Itemized (use Schedule A)...... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....lb) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c) Sales and collections included above:

List by event on memo Schedule 0 (S_________Wd Subtotal of contributions from individuals.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

15. Transfers from Political Committees:(a) Funds from affiliated/authorized committee (itemize on Schedule A

regardless of amount).... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Wb Funds from other committees Itemnize on Schedule A regardless of amount) ....(c) Contributions in-kind from Political committees

(Itemize on Schedule A regardless of amount)... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(d) Subtotal of transfers in and contributions in-kind from political committees ....

116. Other Income:I (a) Itemized fuse Schedule A). .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

W b Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..(c) Subtotal of other income........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

.4.Loans and Loan Repayments Received:(a) Itemized (use Schedule A). .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .. .. .. .. .(bI Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..10(c Subtotal of loans and loan repayments received.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

i10 Refunds, Rebates, Returns of Deposits:(a) Itemized (use Schedule A)...... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

Li (b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..*4w (c) Subtotal of refunds, rebates, returns of deposits.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

i ..Total Receipts..... ... . .. . ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

-, EXPENDITURES

2O. Operating Expenditures:-. (a) Itemized (use Schedule B). .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... .. ... ......

*-(b) Unitemnized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

(c) Subtotal of operating expenditures.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..*24. Loans. Loan Repayments, and Contribution Refunds Made:

C .1)Itemized (use Schedule B)....... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....~-.(b) Unitemized..... ... . ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

_(cd Subtotal of loans and loan repayments made and contribution refunds .. .. .. .29. Transfers Out to Political Committees:

()To affiliated/authorized committee (itemize on Schedule B regardlessof amount)..... ..... . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...

(b) To other committees (itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .Wc Contributions in-kind to other committees

(itemize on Schedule B regardless of amount) .. .. .. .. .. .. Memo. .. .. ..(d) Subtotal of transfers out.... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

23. independent Expenditures (use Schedule El.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .124. Coordinated Expenditures Made by Political Committees (2 U.S.C. 441a(dl)

(itemize on Schedule F) .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... Memao. Total -$282. 00

25. Total Expenditures..... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..


26. Total Receipts (from line 19)...................................... S

27. Transfers In (from line 15(a))........................................S$

28. Net Receipts (Subtract line 27 from line 26).............................$

29. Total Expenditures (from line 25)....... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... $

30. Transfers Out (from line 22(a)). .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... S

31. Net Expenditures (Subtract line 30 from line 29).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....

I REPORT COVERING THE PERIODFROM: TO:

Y 9

Column AThis Period

Column BCalendar Vear-To-Date

S$S . . . . . . .

S . .. .. .. . .......$ S

S

S$......... . . ..S

S S

$S

$S S

.. S. . .

......

.. . . . . . .

S .. . . . . . ... . . . . . .

S $

.S$ ..............

s.......23,797.99..S __ _ _ _ _ _

S

$ S

... ....... .. .. ...........

ALE S

SEDnuMVY. 1976

s.gdersl Election Commissiont325 K Street. N.W.

tiaVshington, D.C. 20463

I October 23

0ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES 41Operating, Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repayments and Refunds Made)Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22c

of FEC FORM 3

pops -.1L.. of 2..... forLine Number ___22(c)

(Use SeParate Schedules foreach numbered line)



Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date Imonth, Amount of each expendi-Steven Saunders In-Kind Contribution-People day, year) ture this periodNat'l.Republican Senatorial Comm for Boschwitz - Minnesota227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E. lnardSayWashington, D. C. 20002 Expenditure for. 3/30/78 $ 15.00

_____________________________________ 0 Primary M( eneral 03 Other

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expendi-Jre Date (month, Amount of each expendi.Rodney A. Smith Tn-Kind Contribution- day. year) ture this period4836 South 28th Street Victory '78 - >,.iaineArlington, Virginia 22206 Finac consu .,inp & exvenses 837

LfExpenditure for: 8//8267.25__________________________________ 0 Primary XXGenerat 0 Other

Full Namie, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of eacti expendi.

Rodney A. Smith In-Kind Contribution-Friends day, year) ture this period4836 South 28th Street of Roger Jepsen - IowaArlington, Virginia 22206 Finance ronsulting & Pxppn /37 :14

E Expend it u re f or:8/78514

7 0 Primary D(General [3 Other I______________

411 F ullI Name, MailIi ng Address and Z IP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.

Rodney A. Smith In-Kind Contribution-People day, year) ture this period

4836 South 28th Street for Boschwitz - MinnesotaArlington, Virginia 22206 pinnrc. j r~ci-ng &~ Px539.92

Expenditure for: 8/3/78 53.9

_________________________________________ 0 Primary M( eneral 0 Other

C~Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure 'Date (month, Amount of each expendi*

'C Rod ney A. Smith In-Kind Contribution-Cochran day, year) lure this period4836 South 28th Street for Senate - Mississippi I

F Aringtn, irgiia 2206FinannC.Qconsulting & expensesl~ Aligto, irgni 2206Expenditure for: 8/3/78 286.05

Q] Primary lYGeneral 0Other I________ I_____________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.

Rodney A. Smith In-Kind Contribution-Cochran I day, year) ture this period4836 South 28th Street for Senate - MississippiArlington, Virginia 22206 4inanc onsi~ting & L'p~aQQQs

Eixpenditure for- 9/13/78 872.80__________________________________________ oPrimary flKGeneral 0I Other ______________

Full Name, Mailing~ Audress and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure i Date (month, Amount of each expendi-

Mary Hasenfus In-Kind Contribution-Brooke i day, year ture this periodNat'l.Rcpublican Senatorial Comm. Committee-Massachusetts -Re-

227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E. -4.mbuIr$cd; Trr~l'el 1 digcpnWashington, D. C. 20002 Exedtueo. te 9/28/78 212.50o Primary )fGeneral 0 Other____________

Full Name, Mailino Aooress and ZIP Code - ~Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Armount of each t'xpcfldi.

John Mooring lIn-Kind Contribution to day, year) t ure this period

Nat'l.Repuiblican Senatorial Comm. Richardson for Congress-Utah227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E.V ~ -- tping Sp.7 50Washington, D. C. 20002, Expenditure for: Sp.7 50

o3 Primary M~eneral 0) Other

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional)................................. MEMO SUBTOTAL.. S 2,9749.99

TOTAL titi period (last page this line number only)...................................................$S

JLE 9

.610,,,Sty. 1978prol Election Commission

i32S K Street. N.W.

.Vshngton. D.C. 20463

i -October 23 N_ -I

*TEMIZED EXPENDITURES(Oertng. Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind,

Loans, Loan Repay...ents and Refunds Made)Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22c

of FEC FORM 3

Pl" 2 of 2 fo

Line Number - 2 21LC ..r.)

(Use Separate Schedules foreach numbered line)l

Name of Candidate or Committee In Full


Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure 1Date Imonth. Amount of each expendi.

John Mooring In-Kind Contribution-Simpson day, year) ture this periodNat'1.Republican Senatorial Comm. for Senate - Wyoming227 Massachusetts Ave., N. E. Videotaping Set'8 50

Washington, D. C. 20002 Expenditure for: Sp.7 50

______________________________________ 0 Primary 13 General 0 Other I-Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.

Communications Televideo Ltd. In-Kind Contribution-Simpson day. year) ture this period918 Sligo Avenue for Senate - WyomingSilver Spring, Maryland 20910 Videotape Cassette

Expenditure for: Sept. '78 23.00o Primary flGeneral 0Other ______________

\' Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.day, year) lure this period

Expenditure for:

V. ________________________ 0 Primary 0General [3ather

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount of each expendi-day, year)I ture this period

Expenditure for:

A ___________________________[I Primary 03 General [3Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi-

Cday, year) ture this period

C' Expenditure for:[) Primary 0) General C] Other I______________

C' Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o] Primary 0General 0 Other_______________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for.oPrimary [3 General 0Other_______________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0 General 0) Other

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional). .. ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... MEMO SUBTOTAL .... S 48.00

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only) .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ... .... MEMO TOTAL . 2,9797,99

4 fto ?a

*1 (locIlim Commissionsc street, NO.

-.h#ingtofl, D.C. 20463

Ishown on Line 20(a) as expenditures

ITEM ICOORDINATED EXPENDITURES 4WE BYPOLITICAL LTY COMMITTEES OR DESIGNATEWAGE NT(S)


(Supporting Line 24, FEC Form 3)(To be used only by Political Committees in the General Eleiion)

Name Of Political Committee in Full

NationalI Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresHas your Committee been designated to mak~e coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? fl(YES (3 NOif YES, namne the designating committee, -it publican National and/or Respective State CommitteesFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidiate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year)

Rodney A. Smith Dick Obenshain Financial4836 South 28th Street United States Senate consulting andArlington. Virginia 22206 Vircrlnin L

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefotr this ranrdid-2, .. I

A '

0/j/10o 282 00.U

FulNmMiigAdesadZPCd aeo eea Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year)

Aggregate General Election ExpenditureR0 ___________________ for this Candidate .- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, AmountOf Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year) __________

cIkC" Aggregate General Election Expenditure

for this Candidate --SFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure 1Date (month. Amountof Each Payee State. District & Office Sought _____________ day, year)I

Aggregate General Election Expenditure______________________________for this Candidate- S

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year)_I

Ag!1regaite General [lection Expenditurefor this Canidarte -S

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this Page (optional) .. .. .. .. ......... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .... STOTAL this period (last page this line number only). .. .. .. ... ... .. ........................ MEMO'TOTAL .. 282.00

Page 1 of 1


qewt0f Bob Packwood

-'IRSW&s Haui I. B.Jr. Teliiil%wM J*M HL Chisfe. X. L

3miliy GeMsrw. Adtin%060In 0. Heck. Ufmh

iliam L.1. 1Hyshawa, Cauf.

fm~ cutiU Mc. Uaaihili, Jr.. Mi.,.m Waka V. R*04 Jr., DeLNO4...~e Mu d..Sc it. 1.1.mait. Ukbiud S. Schwoeikev. From.hma Roblin T. Uiaffoed. Verosetmm. Mit.. IL Tom&g P4. Dab.

inewy A. SmithTuma

flationi RepuBlican Senat0db ,t1 Itte

'119 MR 15 PH14 2: 16

March 12, 1979

Mr. David GreevyFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, NorthwestWashington, D. C. 20463

Dear Mr. Greevy:

In response to your letter dated January 29, 1979, concern-

ing the October 20 Monthly Report, and the 10 Day Pre General

Report, we are enclosing a revised schedule of In-kind Contributions

shown as a Memo item on Line 22(c), Page 2 FEC Form 3, for the

30 Day Post General Report.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter feel

free to contact me.

Sincerely,


RAS: lec

Enclosures

227 M~rn'..uclristts Avenuie. NIK,. * Washington, I).C. 2(X)02 * (202) 224-2351"A COPV of out IPt is~ ide ffviPt h IOw *41lo I 1. .14 I I,?rI,11 (1110 1'0010 .Iff % l.1. Ih II, iti .,m I Im (tlfil I ri letI ti feel un Owwnlnlstim. Witshinilon, D.C."

,,Lection Commission

.ninglofl. D.C. 20463

g November 27, 1978I

* TEMIZED EXPENDITURES(Operating. Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind.

Loans, Loan Repay,..ents and Refunds Made)Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22c

of FEC FORM 3

PP 1 of 2 forLine Number ___ 221r.1.

(Use Separate Schedules foreach numbered line)


National Republican Senatorial Committee-ExpendituresFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.Internal allocation for video In-kind Contribution - Marti' day, year) ture this periodequipment used by the campaign for Senate Campaignbut owned by the National Aaaa$ 300Republican Senatorial Committee Expenditure for:102/8 $ 3.0

_______________________________________ 0 Primary (3 General 0) OtherFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi-United Airlines In-kind Contribution day, year) ture this periodDept. 745711 Durenberger for SenateP. 0. Box 36022M Minnesota - Air Travel I 11/ 10/78 206.00

SPittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250 Expenditure for:________________________________[I Primary C2General 0 Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expendi.United Airlines In-Kind Contribution - Helms day, year) ture tlPeriod

'~Dept. 745711 for Senate -North CarolinaC)P. 0. Box 36022M Air Travepl 11/10/78 I'"0

.j Pittsburgh,, Pennsylvania 15250 EpniuefrL___________________________ o Primary General 0Otherf Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each exoend-

\4United Airlines In-Kind Contribution-Brooke day,yver) ture this periodLt" Dept. 745711 for Senate-Massachusetts

P. 0. Box 36022M Air Travel.1/07 100Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250 Expenditure for:1/078200

________________________________________ Primary X) General 0Other ________________________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each exPendi-


Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date imonth, Amutoeahxpni


Expenditure for:______________________________________ Primary 0General O0 lther

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure I Date (month, Amount of each expendi-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:______________________________________ oPrimary QGeneral 0Other

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of each expend-.day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:

oj Primary 0I General 0 Other

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... MEMO. SUBTOTAL . S 794. 00

TOTAL this period (last page this line number only) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. ... ... ... ... . .. ... . ... S

a November 27, 1978

* EMIZED EXPENDITURES

(Operating, Transfers Out, Contributions In-Kind.Loans, Loan Repayments and Refunds Made)

Supporting Lines 20a, 21a, and 22a, 22b, and 22cof FEC FORM 3

Page .2. of 2.L forLine Number 2

(Use Separate Schedules f oreach numbered line)

Name of Candidate Or Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Committee-Expenditures ______

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure 1Date (month. Amount of each expendi-

These are Memo items only and are also shown on Line 24 as day, year) ture this period

expenditures, and should be deducted from Line 24 expenditures In

determining total coordinated expenditures f or these candidatesExpenditure for:

[3 Primary 03 General 0 Other _________

Full Namne, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date fmonth, Amount of each expendi-

Market Opinion Research I n-Kind Contribution-Kansans day, year) ture this period

28 West Adams . for Kassebaum - Kansas

Detroit, Michigan 48226'/ Polling Survey 10/31/78 $ 2,000.00-Expenditure for:

03 Primary M General 0 OtherAi DaIlte (mnnth i Amount of each expendi-

. Full Name, Mailing Address and IP- Code

Ruth Jones, Ltd.

New York, New York 10021

"IFull Name, Mailing Add ess and ZIP Code



FulNmMilndrsbadZPCd


In-Kind Contribution - Bell

for Senate - New JerseyMpV(.n Ad frtj sina

Expenditure for:Exedtr D or

~e-, fl OtherA Date (month, Amount of each expivndi-

Expenditure for.

fl OtherD ;- , M Generali rf Otherprdi

ratiuir 1-ii I Amuntof achIxUnd

Expenditure for.0 Primary 0 General 0 Other


Expenditure for:[3 Primary 0General 0 Other

Matclr t. irxpenaAiturfeac epedi

day, year)

10/26/78

ture this period

2,000.00

day, year)

day, year)

DaeIot, A onto ahepni

day, year)

ture this period

ture this period

fl~,., lmnnth I Amount 01 eaCfl exoenci-

day, year)

Expenditure for:C] Primary 0General 0Other

P~articulars of Expenditure i Date (month,

ture this period

-~Amount of each expendi-

day, yearl ture tis Per iou

Expenditure for:0 Primary 0I General 0Other

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this page (optional). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ..... ... MEKO. SUBTOTAL ....... s 4,000. 00

TOTAL this period (last Page this line numbe'r only). .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... .... MEMO TOTAL .......... S 4,794.00

.,V. 197S

,,a Election Commission

-,i K Street. N.W.,iiingtofl. D.C. 20463


I

MF

ture this periodrarticulars of Exwen kwe

Expenditure for:

Particulars 01 r-xpe"U LVIV

0

.9-4

co

>0

>0

>~0m co

-A

1~

1~I'.1 ~

tsi

0


1321) K SIRIEI N.W.VvASHtNCG ION,! D.(. C4


FROM: MARJORIE W. EMM-ONS

DATE: MARCH 22, 1979

SUBJECT: OBJECTION - MUR 820 - General Counsel'sReport dated 3-16-79; Receivedin OCS 3-19-79, 11:33


hour vote basis at 12:00, MIarch 20, 1979.

Commissioner Friedersdorf submitted an objection

at 4:15, March 21, 1979, thereby placing MUR 9210 on the

Execuitve Session Agenda for Mlarch 29, 1979.

Commissioner Thomson has submitted an objection

at 8:50, this date, requesting discussion of the matter.

March 19, 1979

MEMORAUDUM TO: Marge Emmons


SUBJECT: MUR 820

Please have the attached General Counsel's Report

on MUR 820 distributed to the Conmmission on a 48 hour

tally basis.

Thank you.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISS] *M/jp, 9 fI:3




In the Commission's first consideration of this matter,

it found reason to believe that the National Republican Sena-

torial Committee (NRSC) may have violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) by

making expenditures in connection with the Senatorial Campaign

of James Martin of Alabama in excess of the S 441a(d) limita-

tions published by the Commission. The Commission's published

calculations for party spending limits for Senatorial contests

limit the national and state committees of the Republican Party

to spending no more than $62,506.94 each on behalf of a Republi-

can candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama. If the Na-

tional Republican Senatorial Committee acted as the authorized

agent of both the National Republican Committee and the Alabama

Republican Party, its total spending limit on behalf of Candi-

date Martin's Senatorial campaign was $125,013.88. NRSC re-

ported a total of $196,355.85 in S 441a(d) expenditures on be-

half of the Martin campaign.

In response to questions submitted by the office of


-2 -

1) Letters from the Republican National Committeeauthorizing NRSC to make S 441a(d) expendituresin connection with the Martin campaign -


2) Agreements with the Alabama Republican Execu-tive Committee authorizing NRSC to make S 441a(d) expenditures in connection with the Martincampaign -

(A) Agreement dated 8/22/78 - $60,000.(B) Agreement undated - S621000.

3) Affidavit of Rodney A. Smith, Treasurer, NRSC,in which Mr. Smith states that he supervisedand directed the expenditure of S 441a(d) fundsin connection with the Martin campaign as au-thorized by the Republican National Committeeand by the Alabama Republican Executive Commit-tee. Mr. Smith further stated that such expen-ditures were made "properly and in accordancewith Commission Advisory Opinion 1978-19."


S 441a(d) expenditures in connection with the Martin campaign.



Sparkman Senate Seat (Sl and $122,985.30 to the Martin Cam-

paign for the Allen Senate Seat (S2) Mr. Martin was a can-


announced his candidacy for the Allen Seat. NRSC purports

to apply AO 78-19, the "Fraser AO," in its application of



in connection with Sit as authorized by the Republican National

-3 -


$123,000 in connection with S 2' as authorized.

LEGAL ANALYSIS


to a request made by the Fraser Senate Committee concerning the

application of FECA to transfers between principal campaign com-

mittees for Candidate Fraser in his campaign for two separate

Senate races. The Commission noted that

[t]he Act specifically permits, and exempts fromcontribution limits, the transfer of funds fromthe principal campaign committee of a candidateseeking one Federal office to the principal cam-paign committee of the same candidate who seeksanother Federal office. 2 U.S.C. S 441a(a) (5) (C).





Advisory Opinions rendered by the Commission apply a


S 437f(a). And any advisory opinion rendered by the Commission


(a) any person involved in the specific trans-action or activity with respect to which suchadvisory opinion is rendered; and (b) any per-son involved in any specific transaction or ac-tivity which is indistinguishable in all itsmaterial aspects from the transaction or acti-.......

2 U.S.C. S 437f(b) (2). See also 11 C.F.R. S 112.5.

-4 -




committee for S 2' that being "indistinguishable in all its



Martin's S 1 and S 2 campaigns would seem to be materially

different from transfers between two principal campaign

committees.

NRSC made expenditures in connection with the Martin

Senate campaigns pursuant to 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) which imposes

limitations on expenditures "in connection with the general

election campaign of a candidate f or Federal office." (Empha-

sis added). Therefore, the S 441a(d) limitations apply to

the "general election campaign of a candidate" and S441a(d)

contains no exception, similar to that contained in S441(a)

(5) (C) set out above, for expenditures in connection with one

candidate's campaign for more than one Federal office.


that the Commission find reasonable cause to believe that the

National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) may have vio-

lated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) by making expenditures in connection

with the Senatorial campaign of James Martin of Alabama in

excess of the limitations of that provision of the Act, and

proceed to conciliation on this matter.

E___

-5 -

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Find reasonable cause to believe that the

National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) may have

violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) by making expenditures in the

amount of $196,355.85 in connection with the Senatorial

campaign of James Martin of Alabama when S 441a(d) limited

such expenditures to $125,013.88.

2. Approve and send the attached conciliation

agreement and letter.

D~e William C. 0 ak rGeneral Cou el

Attachments

1. NRSC Response2. Conciliation Agreement3. Letter to Respondent

LAW OFFICES

JENKINS, NYSTROM & STERLACCI, P.C.MERLE R. JENKINS 2033 M STREET. N.W. OF COUNSELDENNIlS H. NYSTROM .JOHN B. CONLANMICHAEL A. STERLACCI WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20036 EDWARD A. RYDERCARL F, SCHIERJOSEPH E. JANNETTA t202) 293.2505JAMES F. SCHOIENER 1. MICHIGAN OFFICE-1STEPHEN J. HITCHCOCK .,'15999iwES1 TWELVE MILE ROADCHRIS M, PARFITT SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48076GARY J. NYSTROM January 10, 1979 (313) 559-2828RONALD A. DENEWETHTIMOTHY J. MULLINS

Kathleen Imig Perkins, Esq.Office of General CounselFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20463 ~U.

Re: M U R820

Dear Ms. Perkins:

Enclosed you will find the affidavit of Mr. Rodney A. Smith, treasurer

of the National Republican Senatorial Committee concerning expenditures andcontributions to the two Martin for Senate Committees. As is apparent from

L0) the last part of the affidavit, Mr. Martin-resigned from his candidacy forthe Senate seat of retiring Senator John Sparkman (Class 2, United StatesSenate) in October 1978, and was thereafter nominated to run for the seatleft vacant by the untimely death of Senator James Allen of Alabama (Class 3,United States Senate). A similar situation had previously occurred inMinnesota and Advisory Opinion 1978-19 to Congressman Fraser was studiouslyfollowed to give direction for such a change in candidacy.

The affidavit should show our compliance with the requirements of thatAdvisory Opinion and I attach hereto copies of assignment and allocationagreements of the National and State Party committees authorizing our actingas their agent in each of these campaign committees.

I will be glad to furnish any further information or documentationN needed to indicate our compliance in this matter, and ask that before any-

further action is taken that we be given an opportunity for a conference oranswer further questions in writing.

Respectfully,(

/James F. Schoener

JFS:cel

Enclosures

P.S. I also enclose a copy of the review by Stan Iluckaby, the C.P.A. whochecked the items mentioned in the Rodney Smith affidavit.

RepublicanN:..::AationalCommittee

September 5, 1978

The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial, Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002

Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as the

agent of the Republican National Committee, for the- purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC 5441a (d) (3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee,, in connection with the

... general election campaign of James Martin of Alabama.

Committee's behalf, up

Best personal regards.

may spend, on the Republican Nationalto $10,000 for Mr. Martin.

Very truly yours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob *MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacquie NystromMatt WirgauJay Banning

Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican Center: 310 First Strppt Rniothomot W:3chinrnt'n r) r. grifnl' I9v71 ACA-Jarn

.:..:",:..RepublicanNationalCommiteeBill BrockChairman

The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashingtont,lD. C. 20002'

Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for the purpose

Cr of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee, in connection with thegeneral election campaign of Senate Seat.1, Alabamaand is in addition to our letter. of Sept. 5, 1978, in theamount of $10,000.

1P Under S441a(d) (3) you may spend, on the. Republican'NationalCommittee's behalf, an additional $52,000 .for Mr.Martin, bringing the cumulative total to $62,000.


. Very truly yours,

-. BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacquie NystromJay Banning

Dwight D. Eisenhower Revublican Center: 310 First Stre.~t Smithpant Wwrhilntml nl . qnnA til1 ARAPAfln

.RepublicanNationalCommitteeBill Brockc

Chairman

The Honorable Bob Packwood, ChairmanNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002

Dear Bob:


a. of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures,"o'n behalfof general election campaign of Senate Seat #2.

Under 5441a(d) (3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCommittee's behalf, up to $60,000 for Mr. James Martin, ofAlabama


C"IVery / uyyours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacguie Nystrom

-Jay BanningKenny Klinge

Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican Center: 310 First Street Southeast, Washington, D.C. 20003. (202) 484-6500.

~epubican

CommitteeBill Brock

Chairman

The Honorable Bob Packwood, Chairman*National Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, D. C. 20002

Dear.Bob:

By this let ter the Republican National Committee authorizes..the National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as the

agent of the Republican National Committee, for the purposen- *of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S44la(d) (3). Your

Committee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee, in connection with thegeneral election campaign of Senate Seat #2.and is in addition to our letter irn the amount of $60,000.

V1.

Under S441a(d) L3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCommittee's behalf, an additional $1,000 for Mr.Allen, bringing the cumulative total to $61,000.

3est personal regards.

Ver truly yours,

- BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob. Moore-Ben CottenCharlie BlackJacquie NystromJay BanningKenny Klinge

Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican Center: 310 First Street Southeast. Washington, D.C. 20003. (202) 484-6500.

\ ..epublican.:.,ational

William D. Harris, State ChairmanMember for AlabamaP.O. Box 3315Biripyigan Alabama 35205

AGREEMENT BETWEENTHE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

AND THE ALABAMA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The National Republican Senatorial Cornnittee, hereinafter known as "Senatorial",t agreeswith the Alabama Republican Executive Comittee, hereinafter known as "State"; as follows:

1. Under the provision of 441 a(d) (3) of Title 2 of the United States Code, State(and its subordinate committees) may make certain expenditures in connectionwith the general election campaign of the candidate for the office United

-States Senator for the State of Alabama.

.2. Such amount of allowed expenditures under said provision has been computedC11- tentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amount of $62,507.00.

3. That State wishes to designate Senatorial its agent for the purpose of makingsuch expenditures up to the amount of .$60,000.00.

'tftr- 4, State agrees to file an allocation statement concerning the amount not assignedto Senatorial as required by the Federal Election Commissi on Regulation 110.7(c).

S 5. State agrees to carry out the provisions of'such allocation statement and willpromptly advise Senatorial at any time the': State a.'id its subordinate committeesreach 80% of the amount retained by State 'and a review of this agreement willoccur at such time.

6. Senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf of candidate, or if it isaLny manner unable to make such expenditures, to promptly release and cancelsaid agency and reassign such allocated amount to State.

This agreement signed the date opposite the respective parties' name to be effectivewhen signed by both parties.

National Republican Senatorial Committee

Dated ~ 2 V~1978 at 3POS = NWashingtonp) D. Tl__________________

Alabama epublican Executive Committee

ted/~~ 4L~ ~ 5' ~ 1978 at By y...Birmingham, Alabama. William D. H~arris

Title Chairman

w

RepublicanNationalcommitteeWilliam D. Harris, State ChairmanMember for AlabamaP.O. Box 3315Birmling~ham,. Alabama 35205

.18I...

/

AGREEMENT BETWfEEN

THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

AND TH1E ALABAMA REPUBLICAN4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The National Republican Senatorial Committee, hereinafter known as "Senatorial", agrees

with the Alabama Republican Executive Committee, hereinafter known as "State"; as follows:

1. Under the provision of 441 a(d) (3) of Title 2 of the United States Code, State

(and its subordinate committees) may make certain expenditures in connection

with the special general election campaign of the can'iidate for the office United

States senator for the State of Alabama unexpired term Place #2.

" 2. Such amount of allowed expenditures under said provision has been computed

N tentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amount of $62,507.00.

I 3. That State wishes to designate Senatorial its agent for the purpose of making

such expenditures up to the amount of $62,000.00

4. State agrees to file an allocation statement concerning the amount not assigned

to Senatorial as required by the Federal Election Commission Regulation 110.7(c).

5. State agrees to carry out the provisions of such allocation statement and will

promptly advise Senatorial at any time that State and its subordinate committees

reach 80% of the amount retained by State and a review of this agreement-will

occur at such time.

6. Senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf of candidate, or if itsis-

any manner unable to make such expenditures, to promptly release and cancel


This agreement signed the date opposite the

when signed byz both parties.

Dated____________Washington, D. C.

...Dated____________Birmingham, Alabama

1978 at

1978 at

respective parties' name to be effective

National Republican Sff atorial Committee

By

Title-I,~L.L~-'-

Alabama Republican Executi~ve/Comifttee

By66oA*iTitle- Chairman

~Pc~jr9bzaizdaf SL muc 5901 £C~&fai 90rP=4 eznf&., S W

4 Aiton, !6~.C. 20024

(202/ .554-2206

.,:&an Jud.a~aj 9LLa -iiiSRzt: (z22 554-4679 9&1n 1nii3f Consufrng ceSLWCCL.

October 17, 1978

Rod SmithNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, DC 20002

Dear Rod,


following figures to the National Republican Senatorial Committee con-

Pf~ cerning your limitations on the Jim Martin For Senate Committee.

/ As you know, Mr. Martin has changed candidacy for election to the

United States Sentate, and, therefore, under the law, is entering a new


an allocation of the "coordinated expenditures" made by the National

Coll Republican Senatorial Committee between the first senate race and the

C'second senate race. Of the $1 00,000.00 in coordinated expenditures that

you have made, $70,170.55 has been allocated to the first senate campaign,

and $28,458.63 has been allocated to the second campaign. The remaining

balance of $1,370.82 is presently being refunfded to you by the vendor.

Using A.0. 1978-19, all of your contributions (15000maximum) made

*to the first s'enate campaign are non-allocable' to the second campaign.

Therefore, that limit will begin again. I understand that you have made

subsequent contributions to the second senate campaign, and those amouints


maining for coordinated expenditures in the second senate campaign. A

detailed explanation for this allocation has been telecopied to you

by the Jim Martin for Senatg Campaign Committee.




on your limitation.



.......... Sincerely,

Stan PuckabySE: tmb



In the matter ofNATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE M.U.R. 820

AFFIDAVIT

City of Washington



l~q!.I

That he is the duly appointed treasurer of the NationalVi,

Republican Senatorial Committee of 227 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.,

Washington, D.C.


C contributions as allowed by law to Republican candidates for the office

0N of United States Senate in the year 1978.

That, in such capacity-donations of cash (or in-kind) were made to


19.78 in the amount of $16,493.27 as is shown in our internal records,

a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A.

IV

That in such capacity donations of cash in the amount of $17,000


an in-kind contribution of use of video equipment of $300.00 made on/about

October 26th as is shown by our internal records, a copy of which is

attached as Exhibit B.

V


allowed under the provisions of 2 U.S.C. Section 441a(h).

VI


CV of funds in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat), as

U7 authorized by 2 U.S.C. 441a(d) and as assigned to the National

N Republican Senatorial Committee by Republican National Committee.

U)l Said expenditures in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat)

.00 are shown in the attached Exhibit C.

c, VIT

That in such capacity he supervised and directed the expenditure0

of funds in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) as authorized

K by 2 U.S.C. 441a(d) and as assigned to the National Republican Senatorial

Committee by the Republican National Committee. Said expenditures in

behalf of James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) are shown in the attached

Exhibit D. As shown in said Exhibits C and D, a credit for funds or

materials transferred from James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat) to


made on October 2, 1978.

VIII




IX

That he supervised axpd directed the expenditures for James Martin



Republican Executive Committee, such expenditures being shown on

the

%0aforesaid Exhibits C and D.

LI) x

VI) That he is informed and believes that all such transactions

were made properly and in accordance with Commission Advisory opinion

0) 1978-19 "Contributions to Two Campaigns by One Candidate"' made in


Martin Campaigns are indistinguishable in all material aspects from

N said Fraser situation.

XI

That in order to make sure that all proper credits were made

for cash or credits transferred from the Martin Committee (Sparkman

seat) to the Martin Committee (Allen seat), the National Republican

Senatorial Committee required a certified public accountant to make

I


transferred from the first committee to the second.

XII


Rodney RA SmithTreasurV, National RepublicanSenatorial Committee

Sw. rn toti1subscribed before me a notary public in and for theel-t Distr-i-t)p kColumbia this /fiday of January 1979.

LMl

C." ~~~~Notar ~ublic eprs_______

II

- - -

t1~~~Il --a -

j I II II I__I__I

10I 1

12 ,~ - ~ ~ ~ 7

10 _______________ ; ~ 'Hil iIrT]~- 34iITTT T *15 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _- - -7 If i i I I~

16 ... ...

h1;~' ?IK/~~&LJ~l

12' I I - ___ ______ _ _ _ _ __ __9_ _ __ _ t[5

20_ _ _ _ __ _ _I

Ii2I....... ............II IIL4' I~25 IIi I ______

27 __ _____________I HK

16________________________ 0 ____ Il ___

II ____ I

_ W W H till------j--------~9_____________-lHIlII H

A I I !I I

1 23

R I 1?Ac AJ E~l~ 25.~ c 5& r L tg V 1-- > L rTI____ ___ ___ ___ ~- Jz~K i1i

Al _ _ _ __j _ _ _ ___ _ _

_~1 J_ _ I11 T B1 1~i & ~ 7

-1 - IL I, -IIIIn

I 116

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _H_ 2 3

'hi I i27

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _._30

I: . ! .. i 31

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _::32

I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'It 33

j. 134I

__ -f35___ ___ __ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ii ___ __ ___ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ _ _ ___ __ ___ __3 6_

Ii I_________________________ __________________________ _________________________________________________ 37

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _33

II ~ji i __ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ --.......... ~.-...---......,.. -. 39

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3

I,-. ---- 4---- - I - ___________

-I-

I~~iiii~i.. 04k 'c&~~P7 1%?-, k/4er A) AEKZT -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6

44

A 5-" T Ii I/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _ ~ 4 u e 7 1

4 '1':h Hi ~. I

_ .7

7jj 7

33 Ll I3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4_

_ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _

35_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' I II _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

38___ 4r v rI h t _____

39_ _ __~I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I0I I _ _ _

-I I , T-1- . I

J'_______

-~

K~~.i3VIII~

2O [z 4 5 6

__________ II ST2-A IA,';~- 7i-~

D~~c~prrqj ~ I ' loI

____ ~ ~ ~ w ______Ai.AihA

_7iJ~7

_________

WIi -~___

4 L1 4~,T~ Ik' .fdJ~thb h~ITTZ

_~~~~ 5_ g O 1 JtT i- I

_~~~~~;ic I/)1/if FF1i'__'

5 ~ ' hr) A~ LI iK - I I ''6o71 I _

_"_

A'T -VJ~i2 izUtL IT19I

_ _ o-

T

24 II~j~~I77T77TT 12

30-T i ~ Ii'2

5 .

1+ _

_ -*-

393

_______________________7_ __ ___ _______ ____________i

311 _____

_ __ _0K'__

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION



CONCILIATION AGREEMENT

This matter was initiated on the basis of a written

complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC or

Commnission). An investigation was conducted and the Commission

has found reasonable cause to believe that the respondent, the

National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), violated 2

U.S.C. S 441a(d) .

Now, therefore, the respective parties herein, the

Federal Election Commission and respondent National Republican

Senatorial Committee, having duly entered into conciliation

pursuant to 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (5), do hereby agree as follows:

I. That the Federal Election Commission has juris-

diction over respondents National Republican

Senatorial Committee and the subject matter of

this proceeding;

II. That respondent National Republican Senatorial

Committee has had a reasonable opportunity to

demonstrate that no action should be taken in

this matter;

III. That the pertinent facts in this matter are as

follows:

-2 -

A. The National Republican Senatorial Committee

was authorized to make coordinated expenditures

in connection with the general election campaign

of James Martin for Senate in the state of Ala-

bama by both the Republican National Committee

and the Alabama Republican Executive Committee.

B. Said expenditures were limited by calcula-

tions published by the Commission pursuant to

2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) to an amount not exceeding

$125,013.88, $62,506.94 for each of the national

and state Republican Party committees.

C. The National Republican Senatorial Committee

spent a total of $196,355.85 in connection with

James Martin's Senatorial campaign, and reported

said expenditures to the Commission as coordi-

nated S 441a(d) expenditures.

D. NRSC exceeded the published limits for coor-

dinated party expenditures in connection with

James Martin's Senatorial campaign in Alabama

by $71,341.97, a violation of FECA's 2 U.S.C.S

441a(d).

E. NRSC erroneously relied upon AO 1978-19 in

making said expenditures since the factual situ-

ation of coordinated party expenditures is ma-

terially different from transfers between princi-

pal campaign committees of the same candidate for

two Federal offices.

-3 -

Wherefore, respondent National Republican Senatorial

Committee agrees:

I. That Commission Advisory Opinions may not be

relied upon in factual situations materially

different from that present in the Advisory

Opinion Request;

II. That Respondent NRSC will pay a civil penalty

in the amount of $35,000 pursuant to 2 U.S.C.

S 4 37g (a) (6) (B) .

III. That Respondent will not undertake any activity

which is in violation of the Federal Election

Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. S 431 et seq.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

I. The Commission, on request of anyone filing a

complaint under 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (1) concerning

the matter at issue herein, or on its own motion,

may review compliance with this agreement. If

the Commission believes that this agreement or

any requirement thereof has been violated, it

may institute a civil action for relief in the

United States District Court for the District of

Columbia.

II. It is mutually agreed that this agreement shall

become effective as of the date that all parties

hereto have executed same and the Commission has

approved the entire agreement.

-4-

III. It is agreed that respondent, National Republi-

can Senatorial Committee, shall have 30 days

from the date of this agreement to implement

and comply with the requirements contained here-

in, or to so notify the Commission.

William C. OldakerGeneral CounselFederal Election Commission


Date

Date

lION c4

V FEDERAL. ELECTION COMMISSION1Q5 K SIRE[V N.W.WASHING1ONDC. 20463


James F. Schoener, AttorneyJenkins, Nystrom & Sterlacci, P.C.2033 M Street, N.W.Washinqton, D.C. 20036

Re: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Schoener:

On March ,1979, the Commission determined thatthere was reasonable cause to believe that the NationalRepublican Senatorial Committee committed a violation of2 U.S.C. S 441a(d) of the Federal Election Campaign Actof 1971, as amended. Specifically, the Commission foundreasonable cause to believe that the NRSC exceeded theCommission's published coordinated party expenditure limi-tations (S 441a(d) limitations) in James Martin's Sena-

2: ~.tonial campaign in Alabama.

The Commission has a duty to attempt to correctsuch violations for a period of 30 days by informal methodsof conference, conciliation and persuasion, and by enteringinto a conciliation agreement. 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (5) (A).

* If we are unable to reach an agreement during that period,the Commission may, upon a finding of probable cause tobelieve a violation has occurred, institute civil suit inUnited States District Court and seek payment of a civilpenalty not in excess of $5,000 or an amount equal to theamount of the alleged violation.

We enclose a conciliation agreement that thisoffice is prepared to recommend to the Commission in settle-ment of this matter. If you agree with the provisions of

-2-

the enclosed conciliation agreement, please sign and returnit [along with the civil penalty] to the Commission withinten days. I will then recommend that the Commission approvethe agreement.

If you have any questions or suggestions for changesin the enclosed conciliation agreement, please contactKathleen Imig Perkins, the attorney assigned to this matter,at (202) 523-4175.

Sincerely,


Enclosure

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SI R1I . W.WASHINc;ION,D.C 20461

MEMORANDUM TO

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CHARLES STEELE

MARJORIE W. EMMONS-C

MARCH 1, 1979

MUR 820 - Interim Investigative Reportdated 2-27-79? Received in OCS2-27-79, 4:34


hour no-objection basis at 3:15, February 28, 1979.

The Commission Secretary's Office has received

no objections to the Interim Investigative Report as of

4:15 this date.

February 27, 1979

MEMORANDUM TO: Marge Emmons


SUBJECT: MUR 820

Please have the attached Interim Invest Report

on MUR 820 distributed to the Commission.

Thank you.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMAi§§1ON

79 FEB 21 P4: 34In the Matter of)

National Republican Senatorial )MUR 820Committee)

INTERIM INVESTIGATIVE REPORT

The review of the National Republican Senatorial

Committee ("NRSC") response has been completed and the

facts in this matter analyzed. We are currently drafting

a General Counsel's Report to be presented to the Commission

0shortly.

IV

Date:___ __ ______________axI W k-1William C.Oldaker

01Genera i Founse1' A

Tr

REPORTS ANALYSIS REFERRAL UPDATE

O0RIGIN: 06C

lfltrekI /79Office of General CouniselATTENTION: Kathy Perkins

ANALYST David Greevy

TRAM CHIEF Peggy S ins p:zL/44 Ag111.I

COMPLIANCE REVIEW _~ i9a~THROUGH: STAFF DIRECTOR X

ASSISTANT STAFF DIRECTOR FOR REPORTS ANALYSIS4 y_

DATE OF ORIGINAL REFERRAL /0213 107-National Republican Senatorial Ccmnittee-Expenditures

"*PURPOSE: INF"ATIONAttacfrmnts

RPMI, dated 1/29/79 to October 20 Mobnthly & 10 Day Pre-General Election Reports

Response, dated 2/13/79, to above RPMI

Telecon of 2/28/79 regarding response of 2/13/79

Note: Because of the conpiexity of the information requested and 72provided, eachappropriate paragraph in the RPMI has been lettered. Attachments, correspondingto these letters, have been provided for the several portions of the response,and corresponding letters have been placed appropriately within the bodyof the telecon.

OUTCOME: (itf applicable)

GCxonittee will reanalyze all entries reported on Line 22(c), and will provideamendments as necessary.

*Commission unit which initiated original Referral (e-g. AUDIT/RAD/OGC).**INFORMATION. or RESULTS OF RAD ACTION, as appropriate.

DATE

TO:

FROM:

MUR No.2X_

DPLAD

IEL[-lR/\t H. [CI ION CONAI\ASSI)N

Jaiuzury 29, 1979

Rodney A. Simith, 7Thens~urerPrTat2.owl Republican Senatorial Coi iii it tee -Exp-i-enditures227 Massachusetts Avenue NEWashington, D.C. 290002

D-aa Mr. Smith:

TEhis lecte r is :p-!o=,. LEd by c= irre-r-s Z ~sL.t; ~r~~r~owishto cmupll with thc Federal ~1Cci I ~ e.kc

October 20 11onthly &, 10 P-ly Pre-Ceneral~z~ffig r&ie ofth lectic'n Reports of: Rpoei -rs

.a-nd E~z)e:-ndit c'.zes, wer-oftd chat: you ati'EK cerra~h iLnfor,.n-,ticn crT ade -ooarent:mtwaia errors ,-i er anrties. Azttacl-ed i

-,n 4:t-e-mizzation orn the ifrmtion r.cd

U--iile w,.e recol-ize the difficu "tie- you eia rrav e errr :__fili2ou-. thke rei:tik fC IID

CorirnissD i0n.f1oS, T.;c i. - . -,o sc1v:Comision with cemssh-._D inform~aiL'-n -wm :if een (15) days J-71om

the( date o~f thi4s lrtr I o ave -:1-y -;e:cs lease do) 7c.,esi'Late_-,n to( c na cz: P-ridCreevy :Ln orReorrs AayiDivistin on. th to?. 0 re 7'50. Our Lcal suTe

Sincerely,

Sr COrlando. 3. PotterLS - f Director

FEC Fcr,-, 12

II o C00()'74~66

PURSUANT 1-O THE. FEDERAL ELECTION CA.MPAIGN ACT 01: 1971, AS AMENDED.

A review of the report indicates that additional in lonnation is nieeded4 In order to be conside1redl comnplete. Pesreturn a copy ot this form with your amended submission(s).

Please provide the required data, as Indicated (x):

- Coverxaec Dates -omitted or - in1correct,

- Signature - omiitted or- incorrect

- Summary Page Line(s) - Columin(s) __Totals - omlit t-ed or- incorrect

- D~etailed Suimmary (Page 2) Lilc(s). CoIlun(S) __TotAS .- omitted or _ncorr _-.t

-Schedule Totals ___disat-ree wi'th [Detailed Summ111ar (Pac1e 2.) or -__ omitted

D~ate s) -__ omnitted or -__ inadequate for SC1cdle' 1s) -Linie( sU

Full Name(s) Omitted for ScheCdule(s) -Line(s)-

CV Mailing, Address4CS) - oitted or___ inadequate,, for ScheCdnH s() ___Lints)

LV33 Occupational Descriptions -__ unitted or ____ inadequa2te fuOr Sche1:dulet ___ Line) s) __

-PrI ncipal Placets) of Businless ___omitted or ____ iadequatde fo01 Schedule (S) ___Lici (s)

C).A .gre-_mte Year-to-dJate To tals-__ omnitted or ____ inadeq ate for1 SCII-dLeI S)__ iu

S NaIture or Purpose of' Expenditure ____omtte Or ___ inadiequate for SchedulCi S)__ ies

Na tuire or Purpose of Receipt ___omitted or-_ inadequate for Schieduli s) __ Lines)

p% Inadequtate Description of - proceeds -__dates _-vents ocation~ of Schedule __

-Other: Please See Page IV~o

YOU r I n ItialI sii hni.lsoni s . to-_eIthker w-i h thi's requkst for idditional i ormation. ',,s !been made availL0,12puliWc Inspection. The Commission n Urees VouI to file the- adit ional Sub inissiont s promnpt y to the above n

If yu lie ay qustins r~arim-e this requeIst, pleasc call the Reports Analysis Division toll freat ( 800) -- QThe local Washington. D.C. telephone num111bers are ()20) 523-4048 (Senate1-. Non-Party). 523-4172 ( Holse:), "523-1-47 Pa rty).

Senate,_ fle'i's should fille th,2ir subhmissioni s) %vith the Secre tar-v of the Senate., Office of' Pubhc Rcords. 1 f S,.N.E.. %Vashiin~ton. D.C. 205 10. House flers shold fi'le their submission) s) w,,ith the Clerk of the HouIse. Of)c tt 0

Records and Reg istration, 1036 Longworth RouIse Officet BLuildig. Vasin1n D.C. 2"051i5.

(Revised .\pni

i%'ai ionin I Vj'ublicai1 S(21 1;1tori a (~Iflt~-x ~Lr1.h October 20 1 bnthly-1978

Please provide .lgoa gor lection C''oO} d tO1tA'd v~ld L,~ foi-thiose candidates on whjose 1-.( -lf thIe COTTni te uecodnt~ enditurcs,as reported within this rpt, on Schedule F.

'111e. conmittee has reported on Sche dule F several contributions nui-de tocandidates for federal office. Please be advised that these transfersshould be reported on Schedule B, Line 22(b).

The cnmittee has reported, on Schedule B, linle '10(a) , several opera-.ting,expenditures the pur.poses of whfich mention the nrmes o-.f non-inclr1bent~> candidates for Federal office. A sirrnury of these entries is presentedbelow.

Candidate Pa "e AmuntCohen 111~ 23 __ 7Cochran 9 of 23 $127.50Aimstrong 9 of 423 $75Shasteen 9 of 23 $3,000Durenberger 16 of 23 $2,090.05I ~~ Kassebauny 16 of 23 $305

q v Dur-enberger 16 of 23 $)3,929.80Durenberger 17 of 23 $7,140Ln ~ Please state whiether these expendi-tures constitute in-kind contributionsmande to the candidates listed or ex.-penditures, nu. de in accorciance TwithI

2 U.S.C. 441a(d), imde on behalf of the candidates listed. Please armendV1 your report as necessary. If these exmenditures do not constitute in-kindcontributions made to or expenditiae nu de on beh alf of the candidateslisted, please further clarify the nature of the expenditures and theirCn- relationship to the candidates listed.

Washilil ls, ).C. 210I"3j

lOT~il'ro ) \~ C000274e66

Rl:OU SJ FOR~ /\uvllrONlL INF(RNIXI 1()N FOIR -1i-1oi Ej ( I I'*~NI 1 FXPL:N D HU I 1:S CiO\V'RING T ilIL 'RiO 10 D. iUG I'~ 1/~

P UR S UA NT T0 -1'111 FED)E RA L E L F1CTIO0N CAMN1)A IG N A CT o r: 19 71, AS AMIE N DED.

A review of'i te report indica tes that ad di tion al inftormta tion is needeci In order to be coinsdervd comNpie . V. Plvase:return a copy or this form with your amended submnissions).

Please Provide the required data, as ildicated (X):

- Coverage Dates -omitted or - in1correct

- Signature -omit ted or - incorrect

Summar D~g Lies-Tolm~)~ o tals __ omitted or- incorrect

- Detailed Sumimary (Page 2) Line(s)-CoIlumn1(s) -Totals _on't ted or -incorrect

-Schedule Totals -__disagree with Detailed SUMin1an~ (Page 2) or -__ omitted

Date(s) - omnitted or ___inadequate f'or SchetfdUlet S) -1Li1m s)

LO Full Name(s) Omitted for Schedule(s.) ___Line(s)___

~ .~ iailin ~ Adrs es) omt ted or___ inadquate lor Scheduil I ___ sl

Occupational Descriptions -__ omit te~d or ___inladeq[uate t'foScedit )___Ln )

-Principal Place( s) of1 Businless ____onit ted or ____indequJate forScida es1___ Ln5

-Ap-zrooate Year-to-date Totals ___oitdo __inadequate f'or Schedulef i. __ ifes

Na t ure or Purlpose of' Expenditure ___omitted or ___inadequate f'or Sc1Qlic (tS __ Lie ~ __

Nature or Purpose ot' Receipt-__omitted or- ____idequa1te f'or Sctdk _LHiets)

SInadequate Description of -proceeds ____dates -___events ___ oainof* Schedule___

-Other: Please See Pagye 1\\o

'YO~r wtiLd SUbi)flis.Siolit ). tc.ee;ther \,vitl h 11 ues 1t,01 Iddilol'.l II t~n has been, madeJI 1,11,puliWc Inspection. Tic Coruinission urie5 %'(i to ti'le the_ 1addititIOWd lhfls ni) p r( )mip il V Ic ih

It' YOU h1ave an1' questions radiethis retlueSt. iCas all the RpCarMts.\Anlysis Division toll fre t I >.iI9

The local \Vtshington. D.C. tele:phone numberI)CIS are (202) 5 23-4048 (Senate. Non1-Party). 523-4 1,72 I lai r52-3-1 744 Pa).

Senate filekrs shold fi'le their sLI IIIIISIO III ..itlthe 11Cir of' the Senate-. (iieof Public Pkecords. 1 D SL..N.E. ashington. D.C. 205 10. HouIse flerIS ShOuld ile their uhons I~t11 SOS Wil- th11- Cklrk of lte House., C'; 1c 0

Records anld Reigistration. 10-36 Long'.ortlr Ilouse Offic Buildine,, \Vasihinuto'n. D.C. 205 15.

Pnre 'At)~

N-itioiia I PCI'puhl 1 C-11 Seriai .I (oCri i I. LCC-EXpcnlditurc ;10 Daiy 1re-Gcneral Election Rleport> 1978

T'he coi~ittee has reported nuk in(-.j i-kind contributions to and exp-:enditureson behalf of the Victory '703 Coinumttee. Please bc advised that this comnitteeis the principal campaigni conTmttee, for William Cohen's campaign for the

/ United States House of Representatives. Please'clarify whether thesecontributions anmd exp~enditures were made in connection with William Cohen'scanpaign for the Uniited States Sen;-te or United States House of Representatives.

/ Thec coninttee has reported imlking on in-k--ind contribution to 1Richardson/-~for Congress. Please provide thie circizmstances for the conittee's

supporting a candidate for the United States House of R"epresentatives.

Th-e cmrdnttee haLs reported on Schedule F a contribution irudce to afrcandidate for federal office. Please be advised that tLhis transfershould be reported on Schedule B, Line 22(b).

The cmmiteeLhs rcported, on Schedule B, Linie 22(c) , several in-ind

contributions nade to candidates for federal office. In several of these- entries, the committee lists the particulars of the expenditures as,

,.. 7 "In-kind Contributions." In several other entries, the comnittee listsKJ the particulars of the expenditures as, "Allocated expenrditures." Pleas

state whfether all of these entries constitute in-kind contributions tothe candidates listed. If any of these expenditures constitute expendituresnde in accordaince, with 2 U.S.C. /4la(d), the report, as wecll as any otherreports in which this discrepancy exists, should be a'vcndled to disclosethese expenditures on Schedule F, Line 24.

Please provide aggoregate general election coorc'inatedl expenditu1-res forthose candidates on wh.Aose behalf the commttee n-ude coordinated expenditures,as reported within this report, Coti Schedule F.

The ccmittee ha-ks disclosed in this report several debts or obligations owedC, by the corrmittee which were incurred prior to this reporting period, but

~ ;.. were not included in the previous report filed. PlaepovdIh cirstnsfor this discrepancy.

~~~c1 i tc:1;c 44 oo~rz

Scrtatr B3ob FackwoodOtairrnan. Oregon

MLMDELAS

Sew. 16*wmd IL Bakn.j.. Tna.Sea.J che KI Che IL 1.Scv. Su" Gn~wtt* Aria.Sew. Okn G. 16st. tJL&hSen. S. 1. ItAyiL&...,. Caif.S-e. IL John. Ifeuu 1U. tewv.Smn Q..,ies M.cr- bMahu. Jr.. Md.Sma WILmn V. Katk..Jr., De LSen. HaaTIwn Schinjit. N. WA

Sen ItjciAwd S. seJh.'th, Penn.Sen. Robert T. Slatftord Verm~ontSea. Mahee Lt Young~. N. Dw.L

Rtodn.ey A. Smith

4 ~' 4~

Februarv 13, 1979 '..L

Honorable J. Stanley Kimmittoffice of P-ublic Records119 D St., N.E.Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Mr. lEirnriatt:

in com-ipliance with corre~spondoence recievedfrom the Federal Election Commission, datedJanuary 29, 1979, 1 ami enclosing informationrequested..

October 20, Monthly:

Paragraph 1 - See attached Schedule F.Paragraph 2 - See attached Schedule B.

(Paragraph 3 - See attached Schedule F.

10 Daw Pro-General:

Paragraph

Paragraph

FE I a raiah 3

11iaraph 4

- Contributions to theVictory '78 Committee were forWilliam Cohen's campaign for-the U.S. Senate (Maine).

- U.S. Senators Orrin Hatch CR-UTk)and Jake Camn CR-UT) usedvideo equipment from the NationalRepublican Senatorial Committeeto make a taped endorsement fora congressional candidate. Trhise>:pense is the fair market valueof the service provided from ourequipment.

- See ZILCachsu 2'-ChC611C I-'.

- Amended Schedule P aLLachredL.

Taragrph 5 - See attached Schedule F.

N,' ->

'1') 7 k 4 , , , , - - - - 1% - - ,,, -- ',.' I * k, 1) C -%rioii . -) ,q Ni< i

1'L2 b r LI 1 1.3. 1979Page 2

' T Paragraph 6 - Schediule C rep~ort of Debts andOblic~atlons. Wi1th respect to itemsquestioned under this section,, pleasebe advised that the dates listedherein by Avignone F;reres (p. 3),Automated Correspondence Systems (p.4)Baker's Photo Supply (p. 4) , TreckPhotographic (p).6) and Tri-StateEnvelope Corporation (p.7) areinvoice dates. Each of these invoice.-came through aqenits dealt with by theicSenatorial Committee, and not d-irectlyto the Committee. The SenatorialCommittee received these invoicesat a later time after they had been

-AW verified by our agents.

The statement from the Flow.-erDesigner, Inc. (p.6) was erroneo:usly

.10 charged to another customer by that

A ~company. Only after the problem,, was

4XI corrected did the Senatorial Com, mittce

AP, receive this bill.

Sincerely,

Rodney A. SmithC~rl Treasurer

IN

RAS: rnkhEnclosuresI.D. urCO02746-

I 1. 1

I To tb. usle d orIy tby P o i. i C om mrr-a in tre C f rra I E o7.,,)

flamei Do Poliical commilee in F wiI

National R.epublican Senatorial Ccm.ittec x neueHas youjr Comnmte betn otispinsed lo make cooroinaec exxpcrno:iures ,y a rDoitlical var'ty ccrnniD" Y E 5N

L11 YES, name th~e oresnatinc commitiee Revublicar Nal-ionil7 1 . /cor Resrec:Ave S:caConi tteesFulNm.miigAcoirs and ZIP Coce Name of Fecral Canocate Sw:)onea, F'aclicularn of~ae i'~eolu" Clarac lm&ih kfc Sonh uay uea

Automated Business Xail Citizens for Cochran Typing Services 10/2/78

5515 Livingston Rocad, S.E. Kississippi


Aoreptae C'enetal Eicd in &L~enci~l kit

fol tis~ C-11-1c1C~Ar - S_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _

Full Name. 1.1,aisng Adore-is and ZIP Cooe Name of F eoeral Canciote Suj):oriec. Jrlsculafl of ik"enlorurc cjalc tionr. AmTownr;

of Each Payee State. Ditrict & Office Sughl I I wil, year)

4National Direct Miail DurenbergSer for Senate PostLage f or direct 10/2/78 5,610.Services Minnesota m~ail services

7-3Bethesda Ave.

SuiaryPandAethesica, ___________________

Aoroae General Electionr Ex_-en rr

fo"0 r e C?nd0aie - S ') ?> 7 7 / ___________________________

%rull Name, Mjailing Aooress and ZIP C-cide Name of Peoeral G.ir cie Sw:ooor-ieC. Fariiculars o'; _..oowre jDate (monti. Amo~un*;

of Elich Payee Stile, Distict &. Office Souciht C.? ' y e ar)

hnolder, Kennedy, Dye Mar--in for U. S. Senate Ileaja A ersng 10/2/78 0 500~ el A l ab am

2020 21st Ave., South.Nashville, Tenn. 37212

Agorecaie General Election Exacndhr t

for ihi . SCnd doa:! - SY $l_________________Full Name, Mailirr Acores$ and ZIP Coole Name of Peoerai c Sanoorsec. 'rarcuiars ot Epnodlue Da'.e (monin. ArrmouLjn;

of E-ach Payee S.'alfe.Disrict & 0'lice ':)wohj . d?y. year I

"utomated Business Mail Re-elect "laker Committee Posza,-E 3.0/2/78 I

5515 Livingston Road,S.E. TennesseeW'ashington, D. C. 20021

; I crecaje .ercr~i '-i:icon :X-rol

i rI h I .'r C'

;-ui Narnt . t.4ilnc Ac~res! arc ZIP Coot I tram of (. cora CnGc'.~ 1-ncrre rfru.r c) rorrtit o

0" Each peyefe dr: .C c ~.-0 I

?...ih Jones, LZeOs

7z Yr , hrz

: - - C - -

10021

!-'c _: _ -.a ,.:vE- C_ ' 4S

7C ,A r' -"0 1 " :;!. h lie nurzT f o)'

lr:3IT~

- t. I, (,I " , 4

je eel.

c-,. U.C. 6 3

L

F ForrnIs'' C; . -- I . f , , : , . ; ['(' ' , ,,

Ivn. D.C. -"a'(40

Name of Folitical Comnmiltee en Full

National

POLITIC~j, A RT CONI rI T I E S 0OR fE.16I GI FD AGENT(S)01 W1~ Ui 2ttitj . (; j t I IC

(!)u )orlnc Lic 24, F E C Form 3)

(To be ui40 only by I-oliticiii CommrieP- inl the General Lleciocan)

1aoe(, -scl..20 -...

.'L'. d F ( 1 copa~ 1)

Republican ocna-=crial Cozittee - Ex-pc-.ditUresKoas Your Cornmesilee twen oesopnated to make coorclinatec expenosiures by a political Party commilt"?p C. YES N) 0If YES njime thgoesionatinecommitlee: Reoublicr~n Nat-icnal and/or Reso~ective State Co-itteesFull Name. Mailing Adorns and ZIP Coat J Name of Feocral Canoiolate Supporge. Particulars of Exgpenoijure Date imonir. Amount

of Each Payer Suste, Distric & Office S4uh I . ay. veal)

Carol Burns Citizens for Percy Special Consultant 10/3/78 500.c/o Citizens for Percy Illinois 1,Suite 022168 South Michigan AvenueChicago, ILlinois 60603

Afcorercjte Genera! Ele.-:taon Expenciture__________________________________ I Wo' thi CeruodiCate- / <c

Full Name. Mailing Adores% and ZIP Co(at Name of Fceral Canoicate Sup:,oriec, Par tacullars of Exornoaiurt i t imon I h Amount'

of Each Payee Stat. District & Of fice Suh I cy. year)

Mr. Ed Pinto Brooke Comittee Reimbursement of 10/3/78 146.715 New Hope Drive Massachusetts ExpensesSpringfield, Virginia

22151

Aporeoate General Election Expenditure_______________________________ I for this Candiote - S /-L,4 32.2.- _____________________

ull Name. hailing kadress ano ZIP Coder Name of Federal Canooae'SUPoorled. Particulars of ExPenditure Date (monthu. Amountof Each Pvyte State, Districs 6 Office Socht day. year)

Congressman Paul McCloskey 'Williams for Senate Reimbursement of 10/ 3/ 78 110.208 Cannon Building. Montana Expenseslashington, D. C. 20515

Aggreoate General Election Expenditurefor This Caandiat. - S

Full Name. Mailing Aooress and ZIP Cooe Name of Federal Candioate Supp)orted, I Fartacuiars of Expendiure Date Irmonth. Amountof Each Payee ~ ae DisiriCi & Office Soucht cay. year)

Arthur J. Finkelstein & Re-Elect Thur.mond Mediz Advertising 10/3/78 4,703.Associates Co~.ittee

13 T"hird Street South CarolinaRye, New York 10580

~.ceirGeneral Eit-itor, Ex~nnclurt

Pull Name, fasailino Acoress ano ZIP Coor Nim c! reoerai Coincoucai i~~re.~ ?iJIc:Wrouc Gt monr'. muof Eact Payee S.:Z"E Dostric . O 0'-f SC .C I C? Ve.

.Iurphy/Powers Media, Inc. Re-i 1ec t T hurmcln Se': Aez.sng C 3E,0 .

17 -Lit h Av enU E Cc=_ :ztee>ount Kisco, N. Y. 10549 ISc-,:zh CarcliLna

iAC: 'Ea.- C- enerai 2 It:: .c'r 2 x:-no'u1re

jc7 ALo' exDeno1-ure . nis lotcr . . ....

T~ 7 A L thi! ceric: (uas; =ao, rr m n r~rnuD?' crr

I

cnD.C. 204C3

PC)L IT I C.mFV FC D~~t~TV /,. (7, r!"Jr~~ /F T(

(2 U.S".C:. 410W))(Supportin; LI'nc. "4 FE:C Form 3

(To bo ueiod only by Polisca.e Commie,"c in tha Ceomp.l Etce~,

i... e~I20

IeL.e . F t C I ~'.

Nsi'vt Of Political Committee en F ull

National Rcpublican Senatorial Comittee - ExpenditureslKd1 your Comrette beren ocegnailecl to make cooranatec expenaoit by a politec~Al parry committee ;0 y NOIf YES, namne the ceseonatinecomnminee: Renublican National and/or Resnective State Cor~iteFull Nome, Mailing Aooress and ZIP Coot Namne of I'oeral Careocate Supportec. Parteculars of Expenditurr CUse lImeO'th. Amount

of Each Payee State. Distict & Office Sought _______________ Cy er

D. M. S. Shasteen for Senate Postage 10/4/ 78 $ 1,944Postal Escrov Account Nebraska /"7777 Leesburg PikeFalls Church, Va.

Agiroate General Ele-tion Exp>enoiture_______________________________for this Candicaie - S 1/i/i/( ;_______________

Full Name. Malen; Aoioresi and ZIP Code Name of Feoleral Canoecate Supportec. Particulan il Expenoiiure Daret Imonr, jmunof Each Payee State, District & Office Sough~t I I______________ Cay er

Rodney A. Smith Kansans for Kassebaum Reimbursement of 10/5/78 25004836 South 28th Street Kansas Expenses

tlington, Virginia 2-20

4 Agoreoare General EIl.t on Expenditure____________________________ I for -:hf's Caridicute - S_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Full Name, Maiing Acorfess and ZIP Code Name of Feoeral Caeocaie Supported. Partieculars of Expenditure Dat (month.i AmountC . of Each Payee State. District & Office Soiught day, year) ______

Rodney A. Smith4836 South 28th Street Bell for. Senate Committee Reimbursement of 10/5/78 250

Alington, Virginia .New-Jersey Expenses I22206

Agorcoate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate - S W,~j5 ~ _____________ _____

Pull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Coot Name of Fecleral Cano-oaii Supported. 1! ar ticulars ol, :xpenditure Dale (montrl, Amouniof Each Payee Statie, District & Office Souofirt coy. Year)

Rodney A. Smith . Durenberger fo~r Senate Reimbursement of 10/5/78 1,54836 South 28th Street M4innesota ExpensesArlington, Virginia

22206

4 oor ec.at Genieral iectl~ tor x oenollure7

Ifcir this C-,nrditiat -l Q7 ' . 'Full Niame . !,-aiiinc 4OL ress anC 2fP Coot N;% me c ! ci orra- C ,6.a lte Suooolrlec. Partecuiar c" ix: terioiur I r mnr I A c

Flodne . n~t % e 2 -m

.:S-36 So,,,:h 28:',- StrEEZ 1 xpenses

G i enera:~~Ztr~r

7OTA L r 1 . ~ ;z!': "' jone only . .rl~ . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . .

Def.C. ;(.4

k[LL I I UA,-L PAtH1 N' f..UTNINH I I t_-;_ Uhi LI.SiLNA I- L L (t- I () ;~ j~ C I OR i I'D iL~ r IC r

( U.S.C .: ' ,Ic))(u p po riI rQ L i 'i > F E C Fo0 T' M.3)

(To 1we used omnly by Political ...C.,rnm-el I trm 5me r,9ia Eiet-lsun)

Nanie of l'oiiicai Cormmtte r~ i ul

National Republican Sun_1t07iz11 Co~i-OtEe - ExPcn.ditu.-es

Has your Committee been oesiapnaleC to make coordlnatied expenclitures by a pol1itical parry com" [5 'YES QNC)If YESnarme theoesioraiatnocommint: Fe, tjb Iican Nationa I and/or Res Dec tive Sate Co==irzeesFull Name, h~.aling Aaddres and ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeral Candicate Supporneo. g Panculars of ExPCAoiturt Date tmilnti* Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Offlice Souchl day. year) ______

Rodney A. Smith Re-Elect Baker Co~ittee Reimbursem~ent of 10/5/78 $ 848.4836 South 28th Street Tennessee IExpensesArlington, Virginia

22206

Aggrerate General Election Exr~end sur______________________________ o0 this Candidate - S 1),Vlf ______________ ______

Full Name, Maiin Acloress and ZIP Coce Name of Feoieral Cjnocate Su:)I or-itc. lParticuiars cl E&PcefloouC Dat Otmontl% Arr-owiof Ech PyeeState, District & Office Souohl I cy. year)

Rodney A. Smith People for Boschwitz Reimbursement of 10/5/78 707.,4836 South 28th Street Minnesota Expenses1-,Arlington, Virginia

22206

Aggreoate General Election Expenditure-1for This Candidate - S /70)'7.6 14 _____________________

Full Name. Ma'iling Acoress, and ZIP Coot Name of Fecral Candidate Supported. F'airicusoan of Exp~enditure jDate (month. Amountof Each Fayee State. District & Office Souoht Icay. year

erican Mailing List Al1 Simpson for Senate Direct Mail 10/5/78 996.*7177 Leesburg Pike WPyoming - Ser-vices

ails Church, Va. 22043

Aocrewate General Election Exoencsixure 1 ____ ____________ _______

fo-r This Candidate - S. _______________ ___ ____ ______

Full Name, Mailing Address ano ZIP Cooe Name of Pecral Canoicate Suoporied. Fa'sicumiars, of Expenditure Date (monthi. Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Souoht I dav. year)

Barre/Lau-rence Associates 1warner for Senate Consulzant Services 10/5/78 1,000.P. 0. Box 485 ComitreeAlexandria, Va. 22313 Virginia

i4ptrecatr CGrnera! E icir. sirnagsureI

I C,' isi C%nni L1.11 r y i ~ i i

F ull Nsme, hWailin; iocress IMC Z IF Coo0C rr c! fera: o"oc~t SlzT)sc 0 tcp~ rZclht ~rioEach Payee I ~ s.Dr< f~ (itsow=,)",

Automated Business Mail11 Re-Zlect Bake7 C= ittee!Tvzfr e ,- vC eS 1 /,7 E .5515 Livincston Ro Z E. 71n CElS S EEWashington, D.C. 20021

C c .PnC.rnrrl i ef r ,s~~ir

SUBTOT AL c' ex.-enolluret tnti c:; iC

TOTAL. th~is r!r'ic 11s' ait ca ' is ien rn ~h . . .. . . . . . . . .I

opt

.,- 'L IA~lv orr -I LES OR DESIGNA'lrD AGEN() r.

(Supporlin'- L nL-24, F EC Forrr,3

(To t4 us-c- only b'y Politi,, iL~r mmmn tha G e Imcioi.

I 1ae f OltLJI Co'rmittee in F ullNational Republican Senatoria! Cc=,tce L xciue

Y0s y ilur Comtte-en oesipratec to make Cooranateo expenaitures by a E*inittmc-al Orry commre? YS0NOIf YES.name Theo cinatinecommITee: Rer~ublican Nation.-rA and/or Respective State Cor~ittees1Full Nome, Mai-lin; Adlerejst and ZIP Cowe Name of PFeral C.pnosir~t Wupponeoc Farticulars of Expenoillure Date Imnin Arn~oof Ec h-i y " I State, District & Office Souc hl I day .year) A n3 H. A. Post Associates Re-Elect Baker Co~ittee Printing Services 10/5/78 IcN 1028 Connecticut Ave.IN..W. TennesseeWashington, D. C. 20036

Agprecate Genera: blsetion Expenoituse1 foy this Candcate - SFull Name. ailing Acoress and ZIP Coae Name of Feoeral Canooale Su;>or tec. j Particulars of Expenditure Date Imon 1) A rr.o.3of Each Payee State, District & Office Souoht G ay. year;I

Robert Goodman Agency Committee for Senator Media Advertising 10/5/78 20,0012 W~est Read Street Griffin

Baltimore, Md. Michigan

Aggieoate General Elecvion Exoienditureorthis Candicate - S 'L.1 iIIFull Name, Mailing Aociress and ZIP Cocie Name of Feoeral Cafldti~e Supi ec. Farticulari of Expenditure Date (month, Amou

t u of Eac Pae State, Distric & Office Souoht Iayear)Mr. Ed Pinto -Brooke Corittee Reim.bursement of 10/5/78 126715 New Hope Drive Massachusetts Expensese6Springfield, Va. 22151

Aogreo~ate General Election Exroenditurefor this Czndidat - S1 Expenitu4-)ZnFulN m.Mailing kciaress and ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeral C-enoicaitSuo~orit . Particulars ofEp-dtr ieIot. Am uPul am, of Each PayLe State, District & Office Soiuchl day, year)

Ringe/Russo Associates* Brooke Comm.ittee Media Advertising 10-/5/78 38,000120 Boylston Street MassachusettsSuite 408Boston, Mass. 02116

Aocreoale Ger'er,2i1 io ieOtvItcr rTht roC.An r , 1 2 ' .(.'(1 v mt 1ainc A-ccress anc ZIF Coos I Npme c! Peorr?' VViCtsS O~t-ri-Cule'! C' i-x~ noiturt Dl~&e imrr Amour,01l Epme- & Ea ver State. DIStriti & Difct: 'Sv.. I 2Nver')

Bets%, Warren !Erooke 'Cc:-= :zee U 7 S E -1 E ZC. 0/6/78 6365 Russet:: '.:"a" t assachusez:s L_'7 Pen Se sChes tnut si1 >LS

Sj02167 t

le 1., . 1

1''.5 14 C3

f'OLI T I C AL ;iT Y C01'.r1, r1" 'S D ESI G NA) f D(S[f~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~0 LF~) t'Ifi t. . IF ICE

($Supiorolng Lin,. 24'., F C F ormi 3)0

(To be uted only by PolitiLai Comrvmm in tho General Elecj,i~f,

N~an it of Poistic4: C,omm,,,ee in ~I-

National Republican Senatorial Cotni%-tcee - I-E.Tencituresb-tat VOuW Commtte CKen oej'M8aeC 1o Make COOroinateC exp-encliturci, bD a Political pariy commnittele? YES [D NOIf YES. name the dsenalgnecommiytie: Revublican NPational and/or Resniective State Coi'tteesFull Nome. Mailen; Adares and ZIP Coce Namne of Feral Candoate Su00orteC. Parlocullars of Expenoetur? Date Itmhr, I Am oufn

of Each Payee State, District & Office Souoht d.ay. Vea r)

Market Opinion Research Cohen for Senator Telephone Poll 10/5/78 3,528 West Adams Victory '78Detroit, Kichigan 4822-6 a i n e

Agcrecate General Ele-Csion 'tipenotiurefor thlS Candloate -~ _/ ~ ______________ _______

Full Name. Mailing Aooaress and ZIP Cooe Name of F-eoeral Cancloate SuOpioriev. Farticujari of i&Oenlliure Date Imontm. Amnounof Eac PayeeState, District & Office Soucri Gay. year)

Susan Mi. Collins Cohen for Senator Consulting Services 10/6/789c/o Cohen for Senator Victory '78P. 0. Box 1938 MainePortland, Maine 04104

Agorcopate General Election Exzoerditurefor this Candidate -_S26-2C ______________

Full Name, Mailing Aociress and ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeral Candocate Supoored. j a rticuiars of Exoeciure Date ltmonth, Amoun-of Each Payee State, Disirici & Office Sought C ay, year) ______

T-homas A. Def fron Cohen for Senator Consulting Services 10/6/78 .2,9C/o Cohen for Senator Victory '78P. 0. Box 1938 . Maine

C Portland, Maine 04104

Agioreoate General Election Ea~endotureio, this Cancldil - S___')5 ______________ ______

Full Namne, Mailing Adoress anc: ZIP Cocoe Namne of Fecral Canoicate Suociorieci. -a rtcuiar-s o'. Exc~enoiiure Date rmontn, A mown

-of Each Payee S tate, District & Office Souoht Cab', Year)

David R. Ault Cohen for Senator ConsuL;ing Services 10/6/78 1 :c/o Cohen for Senator Victory '78P. 0. Box 19038 MainePortl1and, Maine 04104

i 4urecaie Ger-erai Eirctior. Ez:,nourt I

Full Namt. Ilplngcoress anc ZIP Coot 1 tfikn me Fecral Canciit 0ioosc Faic.ato ,roiir 0?~ wea r0Each Peyet S'2t!, Disirrc- , Oilce S$Oi, jc%

IRobert S. Tryer Cohen for Senator Con-s~l::n- Servi4ces 10! 6/7c/o Cchen for Senator %lictorv '78

P. 0. Ezox 1"38 mizePortland, _4 n e 044

A core'aot G~eneralEe't ~ ,r

f. rhis C. ncar - 2;*' i

"J TC- c c' 'icu:'t tns ict 1c:ro.n21 . . . .

70JT, nn ' ai: ist "a it line nv.rrioer only)..........

Lot%#~

Lit I l~ ;~ [ A I V G ~ 1 L~ t OF~ DES It~ E D A G E NIT (S) .. j2

C l 14, rF(c F",C~ (4?(SUPPorlir-,( !int- 24, FEC i-orrm3)

0 )"ued only by Politoc"t Cumvm"I"I"in ItCi. oalEIfn n

National Republican Senatorial Co- _4::ec - Ex'-pend-tureshas your LClMmittle tote Oleigriated to make cooronaleo ticZDenctwret by a political parry Commit,"? L TE D - NOIf YES. nslme the Oesiaalna committee Re:)ublican Nainal and/or Respective State Co.=.i*.teE-sFull Name Maiin; Aoru arsd ZIP Coot, Na eoIee~ n jjt uo n c ~ icir lL p n tut D t moti Mof Each Pay". State, DITrielc & Office Souch

ay ea)3 Jane Johnson Cohen for Senator Consulting Ser-vices 10/6/78 $ 2-1c/o Cohen for Senator Victory '78* P. 0. Box 1938 an e3 Portland, Maine 04104

Aporrqpate General Est-cton Eneit urtfor this C.andidate - -Sr l 4a e.malen; Acores and ZIP Cocl N m eo e e ocl u:o sr . F tcia-o x n iue D teI othAr.1CFulof Each Payee Stsate. District & Office Souoril I Gay. year)

Thomnas R. Bright Cohen for Senator Consulting Ser-vices 10/6178 1,30c/ o C h e n o r S e a t o rVi c tory '78

-P. 0 Box1938Maine

Portland, Maine 04204

Agreo~ae General Elecl orn E xcoenctrIfor this Carididjiae - S ZJ Fuf Nme, of Each P-ayee St.ate, Distric, & Office &Dugh: .x Itu I ay year)I m cL

Market Opinion Research Kansans for Kassebaum Telephone Poll 10/5/78 5,00Cj 28 West Adams KansasDetroit, Michigan 48226

Aggioreate General Election Expenditurefor this C.rddat,! - S "

Ful am, of Each Payee I State, District & Office Souohte ona h. Amor)

Elliott Curson Bell for Senate Co=.itteAdvertising, Ltd. New Jersey Media Advertising 10/5/78 3,750Western Savings Bank Bldg.1

I Dfeal Generi Eirior, E sotirciurr10crrth;sCndiet~ Z ,, /Full N~ar-i W-allnc k0oress an) ZIP Cooe fi.amre of Feocra, C.?nocatl $P~,~earticu~i- z, a.:-,rnosLurc t t,*rriSr Ifo,Cl Ea~h F.ee Sltet. District & C ff're Sour

c ee,'idws ACVrtsn iends of ?CEE:, .3E~se.,- h~a ~~:ci~ l/'D~ve0--:a 52802

A',1-W~ C.nner& E

SUE-,7A07. C' I~CrrstesDo

Dr- ~ q i lin C . -

POL1TICAr*L roRTY COMN11TTVLES OR DESIGNAIFD AGENT(S)U t. * L r C~ cAr NT 1L.l " I Ir FOrE. I rFICE

(2 L.J..C:. 441;iCd))(,SupporirtC Line 24, FEC Form 3)

(To ber uiea only by Political Gomrnimws in mct General Elect icc,)

I,..C hi

Nari of Politicsa: Lommtlet In Full

National Republican Sunatori:"1 Cct~ittee - ExpendituresHas your Commilte been clesigflated to make cooroinatro exr~cnoitures by a politic.&l party committee? :0 YES L) NOIf YES,mne tiecoesirlatirsocomnmitle Reoub1~ican 1%'-.::cnal and/or Respective State GoritteesFull Name, Mailing Acorexi and ZIP Coc Name of F-e-oeral CLancoioate Suppsorted. Particularii of Expenditurt Dater %month.* Amount

of Eacht Paye" State. District & Office &ooh day. Year)

Martin for U. S. Senate Martin for 1U. S. Senate Section 441 10/6/78 s 17,00P. 0. Box 3406 Alabama Contribution .1Birtn.ingham, Alabama

35205

Aoorewt~e General t ieciion ExpenditureI t is Cn~ait 5 ( ______________

Full Namet. Mailing Aocre'ss and ZIP Gooe Name oi F eorra; Cancicaie Su;:ion-ec. Particulars of Expenditure Date (manim. morof Each Payee Stat. District & Office Souollt I _______________ Cay. year)

Holder, Kennedy, Dye & Martin flor U. S. Sen ateBell Alabama Media Advertising 10/6/78 65,00

2020 21st Ave., South to & %4--(Nashville, Tenn. 37212

A9orcoate General Election Exienditure____________________________for this C2 ndi.ate - S2 fCC. ______________0____

Full Name. lrwailin; Aoreus and ZIP Coce Namne of Feoeral Candioatei Supporiec. Par sicuiens of Expenditure Date imonih, Arnourtof Each Payee State. Districi & Office SoI dry. year) ______

C Woodward-McDowell & Humphrey f or Senate Media Advertising 10/10/78 40,00(Associates New Hampshire22 Batter-y StreetSuite 404San Francisco, Ca. 94111

Afrcaie General Election Expenditure

Full Namne. hailino Addorelss and ZIP Cooc Name of Feceral Candiw'te Suooorea, Farticulars o' Expenditure Datie 4monih, Amnourof Each Payee State-. District & Office Sought Iday. Vear)

Eddie Mahe, Jr. IHumphrey for Senate1212 16th Street, N. W. New Hampshire Reimbursement ofl 10/10/78 1,56Washington, D. C. 20036 Ex-penses4"

p;ull Namne, Winc ;,cores$ aniC ZIP0o~ Na-r c' Freerz' C.-nioicaE Suc)oriec, Parlici c' E&enotlure Lzte 1rtr.* 4mc, irno

c'Ecr Peyee S Cat! stic; 6. Office Soucht Ck." . veal.,

ideS t Advertising .- r-enc6; Of Roger jeSpen .Aedia Acvertising 10'10/78 20'102'L e s t Thi-'rtf S:r e e: 10--'a

IDavenport, lowa 52 802

-"n'!1/ '

70.A t7 i ~'C! I. t Wa ' TI ' li!C IruIS r t I ' '' .~~l . ... .. . .

-t:om. D.C. 7%-4G3

';V. 97 .204

P01-LIT ICAL. F/PiTY CONVO ITT FES OR DES IGN A cD AO'r" 9 , c 041' CJI 'll [.1r F*CkI I 1,I~t . ov r Ic.

(-Soppor-ing Line 24, F**C Fcrr-,

(7 o be u~ad only by FPolitic.&l Cormmm in tuet General Elaction)

Pap *. of 2

r ~,, .' . I C F wry,2

Nor-t of Political Committee in F ull

National Republican Senatorial Coiittee - -EXpc-ndiuresKai your Committee been octignated to makie coordinated expenditures oy a D~olical pjiry committee? Y YE$ NOIf YES, name the desianatingcommiltee: Kepublican National and/or ResDective State Co~ritteesFull Name. Mailing Acoreu and ZIP Cooe Name of Fecral Candicate Suppor-tea. Farticulars of Exp>enditure Date 1lmonth, Amou n-

of Each Payee -Stale, District & Office Sought I day.yVear)I_____

R~inge/Russo Associates Brooke Co-mmittee Media Advertising 10110/78 $43,00120 Boylston Street Massachusetts/Suite 408Boston, Mass. 02116

Aggrep~te Genera! Eie-tior, Expcnitiure________________________________ $o this Candicate ,-)L L _____________ ___________

Full Namne, Masione Acloress and ZIP Cooe Name o1 Feoeral Lamoicaie Supporiec, j articutas of Expenoiture Date irim~~h. Arrognof Each Payee ! State. District & Office Souoht cwOy. year)

Elliott Curson Bell for Senate Cc~ittee Media Advertising 10/11/78 3o75Advertising, Ltd. New JerseyWestern Savings Bank Bldg.Philadelphia, Pa. 19107

Aggrewiae General Electio~n Expenditure

____________________________ior this Candicate - S / 7, ?JT'i76,Full Name, Mailinc kooress and ZIP Code Name of Fecleral Candioate Supportec, Farticuiars of Expenditure Date Imonth, Amnour

of Each F-ayee State, District & Office Souoht I ay. year)

Sisk 1~iigServices, Inc.9800 George Palmer Highway Al. Simpson for Senate Mailing Services 10/11/78 2,3

£.Lanham, Maryland 20801 Wyoming C

Agarecjte General Electionl Expenditure_____________________________ for this Cjxndid~ate - S ;W 44______________________

Full Name. Mailing Aoioress and ZIP Code Name of Peoeral Canidicate Suc~oried. Farticuisrs of Expenditure Daie imonth, Amour.of Each Payee State, District & Offices SGaytI. e. year)

Robert Goodman Agency Committee for Senator Media Advertising- 10/11/78 20, 0C12 West Read Street Griff itBaltimore, M4aryland Michigan

gopreczale Generail Eirciori Ex:)noilurf

-- fcr)_htsaio te- - i) . !FUJl Na hrt alionc Aooress ano; ZIP Coat Namne cf Peoeri, C-nocze S''oortec. Paft.cui&'j c,! : enal 16rt I Z&te ITinit.~ Arnou

ofEach Peyee State, Dstric .&Ofi~c Scuc- c,.~ Yv )~

>ic'aszer Associates Co-=it teE7c :or Senator C On S U t - SE Ser 10.e i/1/ OC?

410Tcvof Troy Buidn

r i ch'ig-an .48084

Ai:c:!eczjc C r-rrzl ilin ieO1r

SUET 07AL cf eikuendoi irs this oa, fo i c O?lI . .. . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL *,nuis :,tO lies-, zjpa This line nun ,.e' oniv . . . . . . .. . . . . .

*' .C r,

(To bve us..d only bry FoIlijI Commnrnils in th, General Ebeesalion)

11 ) L 111 CA I. P A iTY CU ril N1I T I LS 0 Cm4 D!-*S1(1114A * Lrf A G L N ISI- F CF! I1: 1 L NF IC E

lC. ..C. 1 -j(d))(LUpporitir- Lint- 24, FEC Formr 3)

NaMe Of 1 oletC..a Cornmgiee in Pull

Na:ional Republican Senatorial Co=ittee - Expend-4tursMi your Cornitte been oeigpnated to make cooromnatec expenoitures Dy & political parry comnr "" YES 0NIf YES.namne he lonainacommrlee: FRenublican Nazi'nal -and/or ResDective S-ate Co~itteesFull Namne. Mailing Aocress and ZIP CAooe tName of Feoeral Cjncticjte Supportec. Particuis-1 of Expenoiturt Daie tmonr Am ouni

of Each Payee State. Districl & Office Souolt _______________ day. year)

M1acauley' s15188 West Eight Mile Road Co.i-6tee for Senator Office Supplies 10/11/78 (8Detroit, Michigan 46237 G r i-f i n

ichigan

Accrecate Genera; Ele'cton tjLx>endiur10? !this Canicale - S /I I /P- / /1__________________ ________

Full Name, Mailing Acioress and ZIP Coate Namne ol P-eoeral C.?noiciaie Swu)orieC. Pa rticulars of Eapenallure Date imont%, A4mounof Each Payee f State. District & OffI ce Souoht I cy. year)

Hotel Pontchartrain Committee for Senator Room Acco~odations2 Washington Boulevard Griffin 10/11/78 5,920Detroit, Michigan 48226 Michigan

Agg9reowte General Election Ex;>endiiur1_______________________ for this Candidate - I '/2 & ______________ ______

Full Namet. Mailing Aooreu ants ZIP Coot Namne of Feoleral Canclicalte Suppor-tec. Pa rticulars of Ex~enditure Date Imoinit., Amounof Each Payee State, Dittrict &. Office Soupqt Lil_______________ dy. year) I______

OLikity-Split Copy Printing -Comimittee for Senator Printing Services 10/i1/78 2,25720441 James Couzens Highwal' GriffinDetroit, Michigan 48235 Michigan

Ago9repate General Election Expendituref 0 this C.,ndicdate -S;~~) _____________

Full Namne, Mailing Acloress and ZIP Cooc Narne of Fecral Canolicate Swu)Priec. Particulars of Excencloure Date (monib, Amovn

of Each Payee StateDistict & Office Soupoi-I co .ver

Winchester Aviation Coittee for Senator Charter Services 10/11/78 2172ECherry Capital Airport GriffinTraverse City, Mich. Michigan

49684

Acoec?se General Ete.-tor' E- xenaiiurt

I r IS C ~r-oca -c:. I e. '. IFull Namne, ofaii Aoofess and ZIP Coot Narme ol Pezerr& Cacca Sw:ooriec, Parsicu-a-. c* -i,encture Dlt Imcnir, I Amour

o Eail Payee SteDsr & Office Soucni Ve. I

Gneral. Av.iation Co7::zittee for Sen~ator I C~artEr Servi-ces 10/11/7E 7Cata iy ipotC*iLansing, X-chigan 469006 ~-chi gan

c~.2OA v ecrztre Iri e C:- sms n.rzt e i S rE:)-o

707 AL Iris '.?- C; (;as', Da 0 Its li-t r-.u r .''. . . . . ...............

P vo Lrs -t7'. FLCr I wi r,

I Li It's LJ V )lL-Wil o-. I Lt.) LAVI VW L J IL - st VL L- I

P01. ii ICAflTY ccl(AMrT! -FS OR nrictl t')GEt'ON ;,L I Or- CN I1 ES F OFk F!L'W-A (4 ILL

(2usC.44 1 a(d))(.Suporcinlnq Line 24. FEC Form 73)

(7 a be ui..d only by Political Ccommmeqn- in the CGa-rira? C, j,71 on)

I ..ii~r~. _70ifl

Name of Political Commnitee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Gomittee - Expenditurests your Comnmittee Lwen omignatedl to make cooroinateC expenclitures by a political parry committ"-? YES QNO

If YES, name the oesionaliecocmmittee: Renublican National and/or Respective State CoitteesFull Nome. Ma~iing Acoress and ZIP Cooe Name of Peoeral Canocatt S4J~ofled. Particular% of Expencitiure Ciale (month.* Am auni

of Each Payee" State, Districi & Office Souoht day. year) ______

Goettler Associates, EImc.Fifty West Broad Street Co~ittee for Senator Professional 10/11/78 5 5,OOCColumbus, Ohio 43215 GrifLfin Services

Michigan

Apprecat Genera! Election Expenditurelot this Candtate - S J. I, I ~f_____________

Full Name. Mailing Acores% ano ZIP Cooe j Name of Fecleral Candioate Supportec). Farticulan of Expenclture Dt roi, Am oun,of Each Payee State. District & Office Souchl day. year)

I Executive World Travel Committee for Senator

Suite 1004 Michigan rW ashington, D. C. 20006

Agroie General Election Ex:penosiurewor htcandimite - S Mu 2111, ,7 cf____________________

IP~ull Namet. Mailins Aooress and ZIP Code Name of Freral Candidiate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month,* Amouvof Each F-ayre State, Dsistri & Office Soucht clday. year)

Printers II Committee for Senator Pitn evcs 1/17 ,30 5141. Frolich Lane Uriffin NTuxedo, Maryland 20781 Michigan

Agoirecwae General Election Expenditurefor this C.,ndidaie - S /Z/' 1'79 _____________

Pul Nm.aIng koore-ss anc ZIP Coo. j Name of Feoeral Candidiate Supported. Farticulars ol Exp~endliture Date (mon th. Arnouri,FulNm.Wso If Each Payee I Stale, Distric: & Office Soucht cay. year)

Tni-State Znvelope of Co~ittLde for Senator Envelopes 10/11/78 oMaryland, Inc. Griffin6900 Faigle Road MichiganBel~tsville, M~d. 20705

4A0reuje General Eieciton Ex~enoiture

f10 this Canoiclalt .~*~ i 7PullNam. Malnc~octss nc IP Coce Name 01 ;ecera: E.rocoate Swpoortec: wa rticijar c E.'lr t tir-* Aor

of Eavh payee i S.'atl DStrc:, & 04ic Suh oaVea'l

Dfversified Printing Co. Co---zitz-ee focr Senator1 Pr.intin SE7-,-ces a3.iml 0!809 Ca~eron Street rfi

A~e xan :r4-a, Va Z'2314- Xichi-an

Acr~fGerr;,! lezjtc'r. c XCyeno 1Ure

iSU 6710- V,~ r MIS'~,ue Zir t . 0 lonrl).

TOT AL 'r!s "sc it "t in .~rce nh..................................... .. .. .. ..... .. .. .. ...........

P 04L

I# t ) Lu C kUI!AI '4 LL) LX'L14bI I UBL *L) ~rOL.ITIC,^. AR, Fc!~MT I uso mi~~ a Tr,'

ON U LF C'i .'~LiUA ~ LL~

(upp)on lflr Line 24, FE'C For 3)

(To be uaed only t,) Volesiicm Corrmm.#s in 0.0 (..neral F loc-lor1

I*Lei L' I (ifli

Name of Political Committere in Full

National Republican Senatorial Co=ittee - Ex~endituresHas your Comvmam~t twen clesignoted to make coordinated exPenolitures by a political parry Committee? YESQIfYESnre the esonac nqcomm e ubItteeReau jCninatl n a ndr -~c -%I a_________ _raa_

Full Name. Mailing Actores and ZIP Code Name of Fticeral Canoiclate Supported. Particulars of Exenditure Dote 6mon h. Amountof Each Payee I State, District & Office Sought I_____I___________ day, ver) _______

Berlin & Jones Co., Inc. Committee for Senator Envelopes 10/11/78 $ 3,OOCV. 0. Box 4294 GriffinNew York, New York 10049 Michigan

.4gorecate General Election Excienditure__________________________________ lot This Canddete - S /1-1' / ) &/ ____________________________

Full Name. Mailing Aoodress and ZIP Cooe Namne o? Fecral Canicate Supporte, Par ticuiars o1 Expenotiurv Date lrmoiith. Amountof achPaye I State, District & Office Soucht day, year)

Stephen Winchell &Coittee for Senator Direct Mail 10/11/78 5900CAssociates, Inc. Griffin Consulting

L )1990 M Street, N. W. MichiganSuite 310

~WashingtonD. C. 20036 Aggrepate General Election Expenditure1______

lort his Candsiate -S ~ j( C _____________ ______

Full Name. Mailinc Addrnst and ZIP Coce Name of Feoeral CanoiCate Supporied, Par ticulars oi Excpenditure IDate imonirh, Amountof Each Payee State, DisTrici & Office Sought clday, year) _______

.Envelopes Unlimited Commit tee for Senator Envelopes 10/11/78 95:s649 N. Homners Lane. Griffin

*Rockville, Maryland Michigan20850

10 Aoorepaie General Election Expenditure

P'i 0r th I Cand d at', - S / 4), ?)I &_* .__________q___I

si.Full Namei, Mailing Acoress and ZIP Coce Name of Feceral Canoicale Suoo)orted, Par ticulars o-, Expenciature Date imonth. Amnoun,,of Each Payee State, District & Office Soucht cav. year)

General Typographers, Inc.927 H Street, N~. W. Co==ittee for Senator Print4ng Services 10/11/76Washington, D. C. 20001 Griffin

Xichigan

Aooreajsr Genral Election E xr.enotiure

Full Name, Walisn; kooress inc 2 IF' C-oat I Name 01 eorra: Canccate Su:):orlec, c'r ti:,.AC ~ enCirue [,)t ir-on:r., Anw

of Each Payee St.arr. Disinct & Office Soucht I c Vror)

Hendricks-MillerI Cco=i:tee for Senator I ?rni) eries 2/li 7

Typographic Co:any G r fi -,: n2363 Cha~plain St., N. 1-. XMi chnig anWashingtoni-D. C. 20009

IA:rezvfr Genera, zLCe::or x~E&Dnouiwre

SU STOT AL 0ecenoilures$ Ihit :;an? . . . ...................

TOTA.L this DerioC Iras-. r ,Pao s shin? nu.jn, cnI . . . .....

!Vog. .

.C. 20~463

D.C.

F)o1. ITIC1% P NRTY C'01',"rAITT[F~ DR' Oil )EGNtd 1,) GENT(S)C1 L'L 0 .DA [L ro: U 'U . 0w FI)

C2U.S. C. 1 at(d))(Sup;'-rimno Lint- 24, FEC Form 3)

(To be s*d only by Poleiec.* Cv mmr- in the Ctineral Elacteun)

I L f

?varmit of 11-oht1cal CGommiittet in Full

National Republican Senatorial Cor=4it-ee - Expenditures1-a1 Your COmmrittveen ege sipmateC to make cooicoenatec expenotu'ell bD a po~litical parry Commieiittee? ZD YES DN5If YESnore thedleionatgnacommirittee: Kepublican 1National and/or Respective State CommitteesFull Namne Maiing Acldren and ZIP Co Namne of Feorral C.andicate Supportec. Particularm of LitPenditure Date tinonth, Amnount

of Each Payet Staie. Districi & Offlice Sought ________________ day. YteAt

Mattera Litho., Inc. Comittee for Senator Pr-inting Services 10/11/78 1,1005124 Frolich Lane GriffinCheverly, MIaryland 20781 MIichigan

Aggreoate General Election Expencliture__________________________________________for this Canidaie - S , -- ,"' . '). I _____________________________________

Full Name. Mailing Adorest and ZIP Cooe Namne of Feoeial Canocate SuolorieC. Particulars of Expenoiture Date irnoontIh. Amiown:of Each Payee Stale. Dittrict & Office SKuft dey. year)

Autopen International312.1 Washington Blvd. Coittee for Senatarr Autopen Matrix 10/11/78 115Arlington, Va. 22201 Griffin e

Michigan

Agorepate General Election Exl:encliturefor this Candidate - S . __X_____I

Ful ae.MalngAorssan IFCoe Nae fFederal Candloate Supoortea. Particular% of. Expendiure Date imnontri, Amnount

of Each Payee State. Districi & Office Souoht day. year) ______

Commiunications Corp. of Comittee for Senator Direct Mail 10/11/78 163America Griffin Services1 Direct Marketing Plaza MichiganBoston, Virginia 22713

Agoreoate General Election Expenditure__________________________________for this Candidate - e- /AI+Q / / . ?c "I ______________ I____________

Full Namne. Mailing Address and ZIP C~ocle Namne of Feoeral C.ancat SwooorteC. Particulars 01 Expenoiture Date imnonth Anl.

of Each Payee S-,ait. Disirict & Office Souohta. er

Metro Printing Co~.ittee for Senator Pri-*nting Services 10/11/78 2,03E8446 Lee Highway Griffin-Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Michigan

Aooreraie General Election Earnoilure

Full fjamei, f%1alin;, AOoresj aric Z IF' Coot 1,rrT,o1~ Feocr C.%nctrOi~it $j:4))orttC. Pori-cuii--. r. iE-&~r~i~iurvt Atr ArnijL

l Pe e DIIC cio. Year)

Auto~ated Correspondence C~teefor Senator Ty'pi-ng Ser'i ces 10/1/7tc

210L Street, N.V. Mc"In a nW ashing-ton,. D. C. 20037

c~~~~~~~~ eC'iije ttii F:: n1 [~~irf C:,n?'O 1! ~

F or c,~ . ~. ~ ror~ FEDERAL orric

0!1 Frfi F .0RFrD A C

(Su )pcr~l Lil r. LOcrc10

I ,~.., .1

I.&me ofi IPci'ica Coylmiie in F 6#1l

H~as your Commillee t~en oesippnIOed 10 ma&K cordinlated faeilluC by a1 9s0116c.& parrTy commilet? N C

If YES. name the dtlS;0na1.nC committee: Retrulhcan---Nri~R~cpt\' r

r~~~ us A .eI. ~ ~ -,u4 7 1P Code I Name of Fecleral C~anocai SUPPOried. ParlecularS 01 Eapenoiture Ia mn. Aon

of Each~ Payee

Sisk Mailing Services, Inc9800 George Palmer HighwayLanha=, Maryland 20801

Full Name. Maijlinc Address anc ZIFk COCof Each Faee

Wiland & AssociatesCk219 East Davis StreetCulpeper, Virginia

22701

Full Ne. masleng Acores% anc ZIP Code

I of Each Payee

C7Eastern AirlinesNNational AirportWashington, D. C. 20001

'Full Name. Maiihnq Address and ZIP C oc

Stoic. Di

Committee for SenatorGriffin

UA4 .11-.

Mailing Services 10/11/78 ,a00~

SAgg ect1C General Eieciion Exvenditure

br 71hi C--dloale - S I--: / I./11lNarne c. F eoetal CZanodiile sup:Otrled. Fariicularl 011 EAPendilurC Dale imoniri. Omrn.Vf

State. DisjiiCl & Office Souohl 0ay. year)

Committee for Senator Computer Services 10/11/78 10f00Griffin

Michigan

Appicte General Election ExpendalurCe

for this C.Opndid?te - S ?

Name of Federal candicne Supoorteo. Particulars ci Expencotue Date imnontin. Amount

State, Districl & Office ;okpt dy er

Kansans for Yassebaum ~ i rih evc 0/11/783Kansas

AocrecaiC General Election Ex endilure

for this Candidatev! i4Name of Feceral Candicaie Suovioried. Pariiculafs of Expencturte Date imonth. A mouir

Stale Districl & Office SOU0,1 day. yecr I01 rC PL' ee~---

Romanek GclAub & Co. Cit.izens for Percy

8 S. Michigan Ave. Illinois-625 N. Michigan Ave.Chicago, Illinois 60611

Rent 6 Utilities 10/11/78 1 , 2 cle

41:1eciir Crner il Eleclion-Z"e"C x 'ntut

IL) Ic h' CPnOCIdFIt I ) 7

Ni Irn It W-klinc Acres! Pinc ZIP Coot N.-ne, 01 F ci ,,rcr S6L.:)Orc, -. lCA C Zr.C if vc rc

is'~! Otfsu~ Souchtc! Each Pave( s'~

hol id Inn Citizens for P cr cy E.ioz)e 2 ACC ~~aionsI 10/11/711

-- ,l-lincis 13 Illinois

'rr Illinois 629,59

rrt. C--oC)rS -r

CS',,--E7C74A.C c

teRnC:-L-s )

." I 'N .S~~r

Opel.~ I'.

L! C,~~~

2 r%#4* r- hoday. year)

D.C. 204G

IiL III &-J 1. i Ll',% I L i .AI L lt....' I 01f.. 10LJ L"

CmIT I CAj ~ Y C 0M, I T 1- !: OR 1) FS IG t D 0 G t-.TCS)(i W.LFCl!-.~)I~ i: rC,; % FL U ~ -

(S miI c L - t4, 17 E:C F o -m 3)

(To tot Uisd Only' tWy folutC.Ica comrrip.s in tite Genetal Electicur.)

Ft.L.i 24. FrEC f vrri3

t'Varre of Political Committee in F ull

National Republican Senatorial Cc~ittee - ExpendituresKws your Committee b~een oesignotto to mait coocinlto titornotivres ~y aplitica Ia commte? ~ YS0N

If YES.name the monutincommtireReub iczn Nat:ional and/or Respective State Cor~itteesFull Name. Mailing Aooreia and ZIP Coat Name of Fr-octal Candidate Soupported. Par'tlcular% Of cExPenollurt Date $montth. Amouni

of Each Payee State. Districi & Office Soluoht __________________ i. year)

National Direct Mail Citizens for Percy Direct Mail Service4 10/11/78 2,520.Services Illinois %~

Suite 5304733 Bethesda AvenueBethesda, Mar-yiand ____________

20014 Agorre.ate Genera: Election Eipenditure

for this Candidple -~/______________

Full Name. Mailing Adores% and ZIP Cooe Name of Fecral Candocale Suporielt. Pilifticufars of Expenditure L)in t I mon h. Amoun,,of Each Payee I State, District & Office Soughts Gay. year)

Holiday Inn - Chicago Citizens for Percy Hotel Acco~odation 10/11/78 1,828.City Centre Illinois <

300 East Ohio Street

Chicago, Illinois60611

Agorecate General Election Expenditurefor this Cajndiclate - S/ fj~ g.- __________________

Full Name, mailing Address and ZIP Coot Name of Fecral Canoioate Supzlortec. Par ticulars of Expencoure Dale imonth, Amountof Eachi Payee State, Distract & Off Ice Sought Ij day. year)

Ruth Jones, Ltd. Bell for Senate Media Advertising 10/12/78 40,000.123 Z.. 75th Street' CoitteeNew York, New York 10021 New Jersey

Agoreclate General Election Expendit______________________ or this Candloate - I 7.~J~~9-

Full Name, Mailing Aoore-ss and ZIP Coot Name of Pecral Candic-ate Suoporiec. ParticularI oi Expenaiture Date (monit* Amoun*:

of Each Payee State. District & Office Souch Oy. year)

Robert M. Smalley Co==rnitLtee for Senator Coiisulting.Lc- Services 10/13/78 421Co~ittee for Senator Griffin 6 Reimbursed

Griffin Michigan Expenses333 'West Fort Street

Detroit, -Michigan oeniGeea ico xriluf

Furl Namne. t.'.aliinc Acorest ane ZIP Coot Name o1 voera! Candiote Si.;p:ortec. I ar-,ciza c- :-lc.-noure :sat lmontr.. rn owr-.of Each Pavee I S-tate, Ditr:i." & 01,cE SOVen UNye!

Suburban Keypunch Se~c~e~i :or Senate K Eut 2nce 0/1/78 E

33:21 -38-Lh Street Sout.h Da'kotaBrentwood, Md. 20722

4 0rttCne'rz 2 e:."O. 2X:r'.~ M

sur7c-A c! e.Denoo t i rlis Di~c! .r?. . . . . .... .. .....

7CTA. tu PeriC fat: ~ap t line ruurn-.ir onl,).

.iaIgLL-,i-,h OS44 .) Ai & ~ K

(~~rr r)AT L0uJALorc

L :F c) (1i

1 (iitCAl CA~m le~ n J ul; niltG 08 lcin

Pi s N ttiorfal f4u1

c h ' o -'a Our Comm1ie been oe10"S'C0 10e itoe C00frlnalro exenaltunes by a DolgisCal -ar~y committe? Y YES

If YES name the Oiesionatie cirnitree III P. 1 4 .. /,* ~ ~ ~ r.....

Full Name. rMasng Aorell ano ZIP Cooe Name of Fed~eral C~nc,tal Supo~roled. j Priculars ofl Expencisture ate 11"o trihof Each Payee' Stair, District & Office Suas I0 7da -n0-r

iy. vear)Ioltz & A ssociatesWa n r f r S n tMe i Ad e t s g 10/ 6 7 $2

520 West Franklin Street Coittee

R.ichmnoid, Virginia 23220 Virginia ~o xe~r ~ ol

Fjl Na e . r.aln; A clress nc ZIP Co e Namet of torral c n'ifS P)~ e . rriuaSo xce dtr aeI oi)rof Each Payiee Stee Di.striC & office Souorry

Wv elMar ), MowerBr o e C m i t eE p n e A v n e1 / 6 7

National Republican Massachusetts

Senatorial CommitteeS 227 Massachusetts Ave..N.E.

Washington, D. C. 20002 A

Ful Are. ailne carssand I C oe ani ofI~e erl CAnciclie upp rie . artcular% of x -.n cl-ure Date Ir nrof Each Paye, e SIDI~ of 0eo ca & Offic Souc t e

clay. year)R-i me/Russo Associates 'Brooke Comittee

Media Advertising 10/16/78 43t

1210 Boylston Street Massachusett

Boston, Mass. 02116

Apprepate Gemeral Elect ion Ex~endituref for his Canddait - S p lFull N ee -ailing Adorens arnd ZIP Coce Namne of Fecer arl antai Su~ orec. Prtiulars o'. Ex endsiure I Dat Imorl'rh. A r

of Each Payee Statfe District &- Office Souotut IC Vvein

1222?on Str e &Sh / A ver isSasSney & Ellissteen

for Senate N'ediE Adetsn 1 10/16/78 30*Lincoln, Nebraska 68508

Full !Namc. .4liri AccrI arc: "IF' Ccoof taI t 1 2rl ol eorral C-iri f Swooo-irc. -

it ' 'tc(rcf Ei-cr-. Pivei S rprr District, & Office SOU-1,

CPiEl2.iott Curson-

n61l for Sen~ate Cc~ritteeAdverzisifg, Ltd. 1e.'Jersey la AVE-Z--Sn

.LC!1 esterr, Savincs ?'a-ik .ei

,*rE b -, f ~ 1 "'ino

!Pia~ephc I ciCr 1r0rr Ecc-

F.V.

;r.1)C. 0 (,:a

w OF C, r on. r, r .nN .r F

(1o 1-t used C-11l by Foaticat cr~~nr.t"s on Ital C'eriaca @I.L 4lCtii

Nama 01 Pliltical Commilt. in F ull

National Republican Scnatorial Co~ilttce - Expenditures

Has your Commattee been oesipnatled to imaae cooroinated exp>eniurei by a PolitaC"l Patty committee L QNC

IIyIt 5, norn the -esn ln co- 41- - - --- --

Full Name. Mailing Addrell and ZIP Coot j ne of Ptntrsl Cancliate Sup~ortc. Parliculars of Ex.*renditurt Wite imoran Amount

of Each Paver S11-te. Ott ret & offi~ce Sott !_________________ cay. year)

Atkinson Advertising Oklahomans for Bob KA.n~ Media Advertising 10/17/78 $25,000

Associates Oklahoma Vo

5500 N. Western,Suite 101-AOklahoma City, Oklahom~a

73118 Ageait Genetal Election Ei~endoure

for, h Is C. nd -0a Ie - S ,"' 7 ),"

Full Name. Moiling Accss and ZIP Coot tvaime of Frdtial Canooaae Suoporied. Par ticulars ol Eppencliult Dare Imonrh, Art rnl

of E2.-h Payee State, Distict & Office S4u~v ci C, ye or

Co~unication Specialists Texans f or Tower Direct M-a41 10/17/78 90,000

00P 0. Box 1529 Services

)ustin, Texas 78767

L Aooreoase General Election Expendliure

1or this Candldae - S 1?7ffUo1) ___I _IDale________________

Full Name. Maliang Aocress ancl ZIP Cooe Namne of F edet&t CaradLaa suPoried. Par ticulars o' ,aoenoituie Dr ~n?. Aon

of Each Payee Stare. District & Ofioce lSouphi ________________ day. year)

Ruth .'ones, Ltd. Bell for Senate Nedia Advertising 10/19/78 40100C

12 .75th Street Coziittee O

New York, Neu, York -10021 New Jersey

C Aqqreoaie General Election Expenditure

for this C.nd'daii-! /hL~.9 ____________________

Full Name. Mailing Addaress ane ZIP Coce Namne of Federal Candacate Sw0oprlet. Pti tculftr of Ex,)enollit I Date (moth. Amour,

of Each Payee State. District & Office Soichi %l. ear

Hiolder, Kennedy, Dye &Bell

2020 21st Ave. , SouthNashville, Tenn. 37212

Martin for U. S. SenateAlabam~a Media Advertising

F ull Narne. Iaoinc ;.ccre~s ;atc ZIP Coot t1.i-rit c! F eorrti; n c t( ~ ~ t

ocE'!~ e £a ~c . fiec~-

10/19./7-8 29,50O(4-*

~C~

* yea'

Xerox Corporation?.0. Box 96300

C nicago, illinois

C ier. s focr F"e rcy

6 0 69 3 1i~

C 0~~E

0- L

7- -: -, :: -, en ,

-PI:

O~~ iKHALJ IF C ~~I-)LE i, F.E"Al. OFFICE

(T tef U~fd (,nI' t'y P01lm1,al Ccmr-i"tSeon 1ri (-~ (.,e* "" lSc r

'tamt of Political ('onmilef Mr f ull

National Republican Scriatori.; . Cot~ittee - Expenditures

Has you# Committee bten oesopllecC 10 make cootried CAL)CAoi~twres Dy a Politcal Parry commrn: ee? ED YE N N)

It FS,nm th doso. tn C~rmil" Republican National and/or Resvec-tive State Co= ttees

Full Name. Maiing Aocdres and ZIP C001 N~ame of I-eoei'al Candioaie Supported. Farlicvia71 o1 Expenl~ure DoleC imor~h. Amount

of Each Paver State. Dsrin & Office Sciucht day. vesta) ______

Capitol Hill Club Citizens for Percy

300 First Street, S. E. Illinois Reception 10/19/78 97


Aoorecaie General Election Excpendilure

lotr' his C.'ndcale - S ._____________________________

Full Name. 41.11n6 ADo'ess anc ZIP Coce Name o! rtct-ro Ganoiie 5w:)ooneC. l'artiwit o-. Expenciturt Dar imomim. m~n

of Each Payee i Slate. Diitticl & Office Souh ca Y. year)

George Hierrmnan & Company

125 South 14acker DriveChicago, Illinois 60606

Full Namne, Mailing Aclress and ZIP Codeof Each Payee

Carpenter Computer,Service, Inc.

,277.5 Al1gonquin RoadRolling Meadows, Illinois

60008

Full Name. M'ailing Addrecss and ZIP Coot

Crou'n Office Products Co.

P. 0. Box 95252Chicago, Illinois 60690

Citizens for PercyIllinois

Aooiec.a1t General Elecion Expenditure~fo' tlhi*S niat S 5-)- !Name of Ftceral CandioieI SjPDOnfeCC,

State. Onralfci & Office Souphl

Citizens for PercyIllino is

insurance(Workmen 'sCompesation)

Par liculifI 01 cxOeflOIU'e i.iai, iinonru.* rr, our

*Co-puter Ser-vices

10/19/78

9/78

Aggrepa1C General Election Expendliurelot iisCndidaiP! - S 3D r.7

Name oi Feoeral Candic.Zre Suo:)oreC.state. Ditict & Office Soucl.,

Citizens for PercyIllinoi~s

A' CEr Gcrail Election x:'rnoitu!E1Ic - I C,ccz

C"L ice Supplies 10/19/78

80-1

I Occ

Fujl; r .mIn Ii.gi7nc Aocte~s inc ZIF CoOC N ? '!ritC reart? L.-a)0iCat Suz~nttrec,

c! Each Paee!Sr.D~~~ ~tSu

6715 Nev Hop~e Dr:veS pr i I, C ig.~

Erook-e CO=4icktee

>:asa *h v ;et t SCc~.u1::.gand

xen.ses

IC-' e:.. CiCvr f. C

r ct L--t'. vt

-0/ 19/'7 E

II I

0 ID6 VT

I - - . .

.. .. ... . ... ...

wile lmonlr-'.

czy, year) -A m o u ri,Pilfuculars oi cxDenotiure

i C? N

U off C iff"61r,1 n

kUL~ lL~ ~/di '~ LuWMI I L L~. UI i~L:.k.WA

V~ (IF1 C I'\ffFS~ FOP r r 'Fir.! Or nr

(~uru~Ir~4 Lrit: 24, F LC Ir L:;;i3

tale~~~ I.. I ..

(Tobiru .bodunrly by Pol'illcal cvmmmr,.s in ~lr C.. erral t ritr.,

National Republican Senatorial lconznittee - ExpendituresHis vowr Cormie" been orsapnaled to Make CoordinateC expenditures by a political Darry Commiltft YES IOf YES, namr ihe oe~n ncm~teRepublican National and/or Resvective State Corittees ____

Fulil Namne. Mailing Acorels and ZIP Code Name of Federal Cindoutale Supiporltc, Farlecuiars of Expenoilure Lotie imonit. Amourof Each Payee -Stale. District & Office Souoht ________________ day. Veal,

Elliott Curson Bell for Senate CommitteeAdv'ertising, Ltd. New Jersey Media Advertising 10/19/78 $ 37

100-. Western SavingsBank Building

Philadelphia, Pa. 19107 'corecate General Eleciion Exprndiure

f or ihis Canclicaie - S '? /j& ______________

F uitll ame. Wlailing A4ocress and ZIP Coot N~ame oll Feoerml C.andidafe Sup)oorted, rifliC.iirt 01 E:Ar.endiiure C~ie imonih. rnCj

cl Ea-cm Pzyee State, Dsitrict & Ofce Sough _________________ cay, year)

04 Aloysius, Butler & Clarkc.. 1211 French Street Baxter for Senate Media Advertising 10/19/78 7,64

Wilmington, Delaware Delaware19801

Aoo'ecate General Election E apendlivre1for this Candicdaie - S33 i 1' 7Q :-)? I _______

%.Full Name. Mariing Address and ZIP Cooe Name of Federal Candcdate Supported, I'vilruiers cf Exoenoilurt L.ate imonth. ArnowVof Eac-h Payee State,aDifici & Office Souoht day. year)

Rick Elliott, Inc.c- 1306 N. Clayton Baxter'for Senate Media Advertising 101/87,\1Wilmington, Delaware Delaware

19806C

Aogreoate General Elecion E xpeniditureC for 40 his C-andidare - S 5'

C Full Name. tvallnc A-coress and ZIP Code Name of Federal Cancitcate Suop~orteC. Pariciai 0 Exoendilurt CDate Imonah, Arnovr*%. of Each Payee ST2te, DrIS1d & Office Sodoh*riY yer)

KigTae e-ieKansans for Kassebaum 1-irling Tickets 10/19/78 1IThe King Buildi4ng Kansas -

P. 0. Box 1494Topeka, Kansas 66601

40c-ec.1t~ Gereril Eleclror' 2 'DenClvre

Ci*

?.obert Gocrd:4a- Agency Nlcp fc- U. S. Senate 1! E zi:6 -!/76

~a 1ticire E aryland

'cez.t C'ererI iecc :c c '

7C 74' :e e-:~! I"'! nL.r:-f II

L) C r

. I I

?%Javtf of C.'tiocal Commiyttie onl F oiii

Natiorial Republican Sernatori-alHSI yOur Cc'mnmeiee bieen clinated ir Make Cooroinaled0If YES, orin-i the orsienatairc COn-MM teeT\ bicrFull Namne. Mailon; Address and ZIP Coot

I ~of Each Payer'Robert Goodman Agency12 West Read StreetBaltim~ore, FXaryland

I Ul Ui iai~t. M iviii g AcOoress aof Each Payer

Betsy R. Warren2804 Dumbarton St.Washington, D. C.

if Each Payee

Sltt, DO

expe 'lules oy a Pcliical Party C ommgIsIe G YLS EDNational and/or Respective S-tate Co.irtees

seral Cancioat Su:;:ortec. Par:,llcuipars of E xpencliture Loate 4month AMiCstrict & Of fice S4uh clI ay, year)

Kansans for KassebaumKansas

Aoorecatr General Ele::eorr Ea~encourefcr iThig C..nridaie - S / K /

Mo ZIP Coot Nre 01Fedoeral Carrold;ae Swxoriec.Stt.Distract & Office Soucht

Brooke Conrittee-N. W. Xa ssachu set ts

20007

Aporewae General Elecion Exoiendourelor this Candidate - S /.4), L )

d ZIP Code Name Of Federal Candcte Supporieo.

ate.~~~~ay DYerar,01c Su~

Media Advertising

IPsiiCulaf 0 iko no iAOCA ure

FundraisingConsultant f ee

Farticutars of Exoenoure

10/20/78 $ 0,(

Uaze imonth A

Oiy. year I

10/5/78 2 5C(r

Dale i th.

A-oorrolale General ElmnExoendilture

Full Name. Mailin; AOOCII pnC! ZIP Code Narnt oi Federal Cpmandeate Supported. F arliculars Of ExtPenditure Dl MMM oofic Dach Pci [ &srC Oifice Souothi Cay. Vear)

4cle Get-era ie:or !eos.

Fulli Namt. halirnc ;-=Cress arrc 2 IF Cooe Nrn-l ci. FeDeral C.n'c:Z-e'f~ c .u.'e .~ l~,cf EE:*- P2efeD~i~&C'.r~C~

lc- !nlar C erera E~ e~:xf ~ CLr- S

SU)ETC7''..' ci d -Z .? -ht,. (cu--~

. I ce-- --'i--i-- -

11Ie bd ~rlv~r ~iiCal CF 1r.IIt hr C91

C7X L hnf nu- :)er

k ),) ioh ir irf E4 C F c rO )' - ' : '?*# "- ' .L I c,,,-

It C I son)

Arno,

SStreet. N *

.. 0iqtn I C 20-1153

ON WAHAL[' 0I (CANUIDA] LS FOR1 I LD[AAL (A I ICL

(SUp~jloI tfg Line 24, F EC Form 3)

CT7o be uira oily by fllt~i Coilimistxe in itio Gci-iual Lluciouii)

lii .I ~ I 1G I, I II(.f

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Arriount

Stcven Saunders Salary $908.31 SlrNatl. Republican Sent. Conrm In-knd contribution- Saay330-78 15.00

*People for Boschwitz,227 tnjssachusetts Ave., N.E. Mvinnesta SenateWashinigton, D.C. 20002

Agorcuare General Election Expndtr

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Am~ount

LI) of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _ ______________ day, year) _______

C% Conruications Corp. of In-kiind contribution Printing Services__f- Amrurica People for IBoschwitz

1M Direct Marketing Plaza Com. (NSenate)Jue 78 291

- Boston, VA 22713 (printing services)


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ for this Candidate -- S_ _

Full Namne, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amnouiit

snwof Each Payee _____ State, District & Office Sought day. year)

C~Rodney A. Smith In-kind expenditure to Cnutn4836 South 28th Street the Victory '78 Comrm. Cosltn

0 Arlington, VA 22206 (ME Senate) (consulting Expenses 8-3-78 267.21CO, and expenses)

C Aggregate General Election Expenditure

C"N for this Candidate -- S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars 01 Expenditure Date (month. ron

1%of Each Payee State. District & Office Sought ________________ day, year) _______

Rodney A. Smith Allocated expnditure to Consulting4836 South 28th Street Friends of Pager Jepsen & 8-3-78 531.4'Arlington, VA 22206 (LA, Senate) (consulting Epne

and expenses) Epne

Auoregate General Elect inn Expenditurefor this Candidate -S

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particular-, of Expenditure [Dale I t nh AMC)

of Each Payee Slte. District & Office Sciuh day. V1i01 r

P odney A. Smith Allocated exlxpnditure to cnutn4836 South 28th Street People for Boschwitz & t8-3-78 53i

lington, VA 22206 (fr, Senate) (Consulting Expensesand expe~nses)

Ao~tc~te eneal mecion E x ediiure

for lthis Cancrdi'

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this pacle (lomtonil(............................... .. . . ..... . . . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .....

TOTAL this period blast Pace thiis iwe nu-ber only) .. .. ... . . .. .... . ..................... . . . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ...

'j * Sitriet, N ~'iligron. V) C 2U463

I II fi It(fIINrAI I 1 1 1X1 NII I Hi AM' 11Y'A~l I~ I ; I N' C NMi 1 11: ;. IS 0 1.) : S 1 1) /AGL N I (S)

ON BL I AL I OF CANDI L)A ILS F OR I L UI.HA L 0) IA ICL(W j. S. C. -4#4 It (d1))

(S;uliornlly LiII! 24 , [ EC Form~ 3)

(1 o Ie uewil ily by iili a u'u . t ill th (iviii l 1.1si in,,

l it int 24. 1 1 CIii

Name of Political Comimittee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Corrrittee - Expenditures

Hai your Commitee been designated to mnake coorclinateo ex&penditures by a politcal party committee? C] YES QONOIf YES, namne the designatitrig committee:_______________

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federail Candidate SupPorted. Particuilars of Expenlditure Date (month. 'Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Offi~ce Sought day. year I

Podney A. Smi th Allocated exTpenditure, tc Cnut g4836 South 28th Street Cochran for Senate, V0S 8-3-78 2836.05Arlington, VA 22206 (Consulting & expenses) Expenses

Ann eatie General Ei-c tj un F xpenditure

for this Cwr1iljate -S

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (mnonth. Amount

10 of Each Payee State. District & Office Sought dy er

'Rodney A. Smith Allocated expenditure to Con sulting 8-782 .0'~4836 South 28th Street Obenshain for Senate, VA&8-782 .0

j~ rligto, V 2206(Consulting & Expenses) Expenses

Aggtegate General Election Expenditure

for this Candidate - SFull Name. Mailing Aodiress and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought _______________ day. year)

r' Rodniey A. Smith In-kind expenditure to ConsultingNr 4836 South 28th Street Cochran for Sena%'-e, MS & 91-8 828~ Alinto, V 2206(Consulting & Expenses) Expenses

Aggregate General Election ExpenditureC/1'. Ifo r this Candidate~ ..

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount

of Each Payee Stare, District & Office Soidght day. year)

Mary Hasenf us In-kind' contribution Tae ogncNatl. Republican Sent. Comru.Brooke Conrmittee, MJASS Expenses227 Massachusetts Ave., N.E1.(rejirbursed travel & 9-28-78 212.50Washington, D.C. 20002 lodging)

17 Virirti Genera L li ct.n E.Ptlrirrdrture

lo r ( i % r C.Inch hit S

Full Name. Mail ing~A d s adZPC d Na-i ofn F cdii &l Cindt. ti tc Suoliitid, I'l Ci.iJr! 0i L tierrlitsitei [Ijl. nrri A Poiunt

of Each Payee State, District &' Office Sought dy ir

Johin Mxyjrinci hI-kind contrib~ution to VietpnNatl. Republictan Sent. Conr. Richardson for Congress Videotapin227 Massachusetts Ave. , N.EF1! Utah (videotCaping) Sept. 7 250

Washington, D.C. 20002 117 A it coae Ger.rari Eliction E xpelioie

SUBTOTAL of CiC,E0 r . 1105t this paoe io:Drt -cii ri . . . .... ...............

TOTAL *hi tieriL, no 0as rtn~ ithi, linre nufntw ic l . .ii . . . . .........

I

''I ILL I

1I 78

letii Ition Collriiso

E)irrt~ C. 204G3

Ii~i/) COURD INAl E) [D XPI N IILIJIAIA[ 1: 1I'OLI1 ICAL PAHTY COMM~IT*T ES OR~ DESIGNATED AGLUI~ I (S)

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICL(2 U.-S.C. 44 1a (d))

(Suprxjrtinw Line 24, FEC Formn 3)


F ut Line 2~4, F EC Fi'v 3

Name of Political Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial Ccxrrttee - ExpendituresHas your Committee been dlesignatedi to make coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? QYES I- NOIf YES, name the de!,onatino committeeFull Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Dale (month, Amount

of Each Poyee State, District & Of fice Sought ________________ day. year) _______

Johni tborilig in-ki-nd contribution to VideotapingNati. Republican Sen. %rrno. Simrpson for Senate Com227 Aasszichusetts Ave. , N.. Wyoming (videotaping) Sp. '78 2)5.00Washingt on, D.C. 20002

Aqgregate General Election Expenditure

for this Candidate -S________________

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Ar'iount

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought j day. year) _______

ConTinications Televideo Ltd. In-kind contribution Videotape918 Sligo Ave. to Simpson for Senate CassetteSilver Spring, MD 20910 WY (videotape cassetts) Sept. '78 23.00

Aggregate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate -- S ______

Full Namne, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amountof Each Payee State, District & Office Soug.'t ________________ day. year)

Aggreglate General Election ExpenditureIfor t his Candidate - S _______________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure jDate (month. Amountof Each Payee I State, District & Office Sought day. year)I

Full Name, Mailiri Address and ZIP Coce Namre of Federal Canaidate Supported. Particulars, of Expenditure Dale (mornth. Amountof Each Payee State, District & Of fice Sought clay,_year

IAonrecate General Elt'ction Expedrr

ior thit Candidvie - S

SUBTOTAL of eit:i: ritur vt this9,9 tidltioiial

TOTAL tit rioc~ liast oaw! thi% line number only)I .....................................................................S

I __ - I

"SrV 1975...1; Liectioi Comimrtsson

K( Street, N.W.*rington. D.C. 20-463

1H LMIZ4L) LX!X.,hI1 URESMg.e r~lIq, ratisfers Owu, (.wiutributions Irs.Ionm,

Loamns, Loan Repaymernt-, aitid Refunds Moce)Supporting Lines 20a. 2 i,. arid 22a. 22b, and 22c

ol F EC FO0M-M 3

(List Sroaiiate !,Cheakiies for

emci riurntiered fine)

Name of Candidate or Committee in FullNational Republican Senatorial Committee

Full Nome, Mailing Address and ZIP Codle Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount Of each expendi.

Martin For U. S. Senate Sec. 441 Contribution dy er uettsproP. 0. Box 3406 _______ _______ 10-6-78 $17,000.00Birmingham, Alabama 35205 Expenditure for:I_ ____

_______________________________________[_ Primary _QGeneral 0OtherFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expsenditure Date (month, Amount of ea:h ex~end..


rExpenditure for:

___________________________________ 0 Primary 0General 0) OtherFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount of each expendi.

day. year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o) Primar~' 0 General 0 Other

! Full Name, Mailing Adaress and ZIP Code Par-ticulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of eacn expendl,.

u iday,

year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0 General 0Other

I~ [ Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Particulars; of Expenditure Date (month, Amount of eachi expendi.-day, year) ture this period

C, Expenditure for:__________________________________ 0 Primary 0General 0Other

Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Coot Particular% of Expenoiture Date (month, Amount of each exp)end,-day, year) ture this period

Expenditure for:o Primary 0General 0Other

Full Name. Mailing Adoress and ZIP Coot Particuiars of Expenditure Date (monthi, Amount 01 eac?) exciei

day. year) ture this perioc

Expenditue for.o: Primnary General O ther

Full Name, Mailing Adloress and ZIP Coot Particular% of Exoienditore Daitmnh Amrountl cl ta~rh eX::rrio,.

Clay, epr)luft 1hil, Deroc

Expenditure for-

0 Primary [D Genera! 0 Olne.

SUBTOTAL of expenditures this oaoe Io.-tona....................................... .. . 7 ,000 .0 0

TOTAL this period (last paot this line numpn' cn' -;....... .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .~ 17.0

14 I)I *Ih 1 1. \ I) f X1.1 r~)le i.:-S MALC BYv

W. ~ I ICA I PA fl1 YCOII orIr 'iIF! r - ) I ) DMCINA I 1. AGL N I~1 I,.v~ Cu"~im55 4iON 3L1IJAL F Of- CANLJIDA!ES FUR FEUJEfAL OFFICE

ias~,~ s~, D.C. O4G ~(S Lipp orin q Lirm- 24 , F EC F orm 3)(To he used only by Politicail Commites in the CGeneiial Election)

Name of Political Comtmittee in F ullNational Republican Senatorial Committee

-Has Your Committee been desiclnrated to mak~e coordinated expenditures by a political party comnmitee? 0 YES 0NO3 ~~Full Name, MailinQ Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported, Partiuaso xedtr aelot, Aoof Each Payee State, District & Office Souoht dy er

Dorothy Jordan 114l Hosigo1hen1

East Sebago, Maine Maine

Aqgregate General Election Expendliturefor this Candidate -SFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidat Suorted, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, AmouCof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, year)

IThe Postmaster Thad CochranUnited States Senate U.S. Senate Postage 9-20-78 127.Washington, D. C.Mis spiIn0V)20510Mis spp

Aggregate Genera TIElectlion ExedtrFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date lmonith, ArJ~c ~of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought

day._yar.N The Postmaster Bill ArmstrongC6t United States Senate U.S. Senate Postage9-17C Washington, D. C. Colorado

20510

INAggregate GnrlEetofor this Candidate Genra ElcinES edtrFull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported,. Particulars of Expendituie Date (month, Amuun:of Each Payee State, District & Office SoughtI

The Postmaster Do-n Shasteen dy elU.S. Postal System U.S. Senate Postage 9-21-781 3,000Nebraska 171

F ull Name, Mhiilinc. A(irt11(55 du ZIP Code Ninie of Fedi-rar C.inridai Suruporivou Pauticuidrs of Expenditure Uate (month Aunof Each Paryee State, Districi & Office Sought Iday. yvar)

Automated B3usiness M1ai David Durcnbcrgei75515 LivinjqSton Road I U.S. Senate TyigSriel -671 2,090.tWashingtol., D. 2002 Minnesota

SAaore("ate Gvnerai: Elec on E xDend-.TrIcir ithis Cano,:2rct S

ESUBTOTAL ofre'x',))nd,iures this pace ilonal)TOTAL This piriod (last vaoe ti line nurmt-,r only).

.................................................... ... ..... . ... . ...

.i.iI~~ l I - - - E

IT E*L[) COORDINATE L) IXPLNE)ITUAVIAUE B3YPOLIT ICAL PAR~ TY COMMITTE.LS OR DESIGNATED AGENT(MS)


(Supporting Line 24, F EC Form 3)


For Line 24. F EC Fun 3

Name of Poitical Committee in Full

National Republican Senatorial CommitteeHas your Committee been desiqnated to make coordinated expenditures by a Political party committ!e? QYES [3 NOIfI Y ES. name the dlesionat inq committee:Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP-Code Name of Ferderal Candidate Supported, Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amount

of Each Payee State. District & Office Sought day. year)

United Airlines Nancy KassebaumDept. 745711 U.S. Senate Air Travel 9-26-78 305.00P. 0. Box 36022M KansasPittsburgh, Penns.

15250 ____________

Aggregate General Election Expenditure______________________________I for this Candidate -. S

0 Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Cde Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month, Amount

-JTof Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day. year I

.. Communications corp. David Durenberger Direct MailofAmerica U.S. Senate Services9-7 8 812.

.±V 1 #1 Direct Marketing .. MinnesotaPlaza

~'~F Boston, VA 22713 ___________

Aggregate General Election E xpenditurefor this Candidate - S_____________________

Full Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Date (month. Amountof Each Payee State. District & Office Sought _______________ day. year) _______

C'National Direct Mail David DurenbergerService Inc. U.S. Senate Direct Mail9-7 8 7,4.

2233 Wisc. Ave., N.W. Minnesota Services 92 -8 7100S#800

r~Wash, D.C. 20007 Aggregate General Election Expenditurefor this Candidate -- S ______________

j. Full Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Supported. Particulars of Expenditure Dalte tmonth. j Amount

of Each Payee State. District & Office Sought day, yea.rI

Arvat. G encral Election Exliindtu' 1for this Cindidjtle. S

Full rNamet, MailinQ Aoaress and ZIP Code Name of Federal Candidate Suotworted. Particulars of Exl~endlture Dale irionth, Amou ri

of Each Payee State, District & Office Sought day, veal)

IAggrecate General Election Expendrurrfor this. Candidate S

SUBT CTAL of expenditures this Pagt' (ovtional)............................................ .. .. ........ . . i 2 3. 1 6_7TOTAL inrerirod (last paoc ihis line number only) .. .. ........... ... ................... ..... . . . . .5 2 3 ,1 6

-f'l EleCti1ir Cormmission

K, S t f et, N WV,

iriatori, 0) C 20463

Itp ?

Nam, o '0gcjCjmgs

['UL I i ILAL. I'Ali Y L CU to' Mi I -L U ORU" )S I U iNI L U A G L 1 I

C:* U... 1Mdfl ( v),(SUppo r, Iri i '-i t,4 F L C F c)tr-, Z)

(0 L-CV# un&rly tly Political -omnmrriwesi n the General Le~ipcs~.

~~r* ~ ~ILC Vrr,

*t in Full

National FRe~ub~ican C--ta--'i Coi-6ee-B-x-:endi-6ureHtas YOU( Committee torFI otsigattO o 0mace COO?If YES, namen th~e orsionutin; comnmittee-

ainaied expencitures Dy a political CAarTy commitlt? Y ES 0t

Full Name. Mailing A00reu anid ZIP Coot Namne 01 Feceral Canoicale Sw;*onrec. j articutars of ExpefoiJurt Dat Imont kmour,of Each Payee Stl, istrici L Offlice Sol05 _____________ C-ay, ytar.)

Daniels & Associates, Inc.400 Office Par-k DriveBir~inShaz=, Alaba~z 35223

Full Namne. W~aili; Aooress arnd ZIP Coceof Each Payee

R. J. Sann & Associates630 - 916.h AvenueNew York, New York 10030

Yartin forAl ab a

U. S. Senate

Apprecae CGererai EIe-clicim ELQ'enOIluft

fct this C~anigCait- 7Namne ol Feoleral rCanoC-i'Sv.p:orieC*

Stale, District & Office Souchit

Kansans for

Kansas1Kassebaum

Agorepate General Election E x:enciturrlort his Caniuie - s % qJL. 19

Xiedia Adver.tisingC. ?rogra,ing

Xediz Advertising

ull Name. mailint koorist and ZIP Code Name of Feoeral Canoidate Supporiez, Faritculars of Excxrdiiure Date Imonth.I Amnour,cf Eajch Payee 'I Stale, District & Of fice scivaht dry________________ '.ye

Xonarch Pri-nting Corp. Citizens for Percy

] ,hcaso, Illinois 60607

A~porecpate General Election Ex.nendsiure

FulNamne. sailin; A00ress and ZIP Cooe Nzime 01 Fecral Ccnocte Supoiortec. Pjrjicwuars of xgo>_noijure DI-te (month. Amoof Eacri Payee State. District & Office Souchi I ?y. yeas.

Romanek Golub & CopDany Citiz .e-s for 1Percy :vrent for8 South Michigan Ave. Illinois ofice s?ace 9-5-78625 N. Michigan Ave.

Chicao, l1i'nois 60611Chre.,t C'er ct~ Cn 0i'

to, this C. too '-,%f..~

Fjjll Nrrme, Whdnz: ;Accress enC ZIP Co00 Na~me C! Feer&i Ctct 0:oe.. .& :xzw~rjr .. 0 r~s,c' Fr Pve! S Da . sir-, & 0 ~ UNvz

z:eV. ac~:r.550CazeS E c 71Z 'C7' E Ar~i

F, S C7

- ~r'. :e~: is ...c~ ~s lirir ~ erR

9-1-78 2590

cit[ULIl ICAL [Af~1 Y (20MM Ii] LL~0R DL~IGtA1 L~ AL~Lr~ I ~)

CCl!*ALF OF CANUIUI.)i LS FOR f LI) ~ c

(,upponing L 'ne 2". F EC Form~

17o L.. umad only)h by Po'ciecA, ommrlp s in the General Elaon)i

N~ame of I-olitgi.i C.ommirnille of F UJI

Kai your Cormmittee ben le-igeateC to rma~.t coooaiatec ex~encitures by a Political Parry commnittee? r" Y ES 0 140If YES, name the oesienatinp commitre: C-2 o-v4r -;on~" / Re,-) ct yp Stpt. r~-tFull Name. Mailing Aowr.s and ZIP COOC Name of Feoceral can.ecate Svpportec. j Pantarullanl Of EXPeMature Date jtflCreth* Amnount

of Eacht Payee Stat, Disirici &r Of fice Souocet COY._____________ j ,~vel

Wendt 'Advertising Wlliams for Senate Media Advertising 9-6-78 $ 10900P. 0. Box 2128 MobntanaGreat Falls, Montana

59403

Accreat~ General Election Ex.ienoat ure1

Full Name. 14aili; Acloress and ZIP Coot Name of Fceral Caenoioate Suporled. FartiCuiarlSo Al aptrtture Date fmofltri. Amnointof Each Payee State, District & Office Souop% I J ay. yearI

tlc 6th Jones, Ltd. Bell for Senate Con123 East 75th Street New Jersey Yiedia-Advertising 9-6-78 25,00

Ag9preoate Genera! Eliecon Exoendoure]

EPJ1Name. Mailinc Adloress and ZIP Coce Name of Fecieral Canclcate Su:)porteC. Partic-ulars of i-xpenooeture Date irmon ti, Affo,,ntof Each F-ayee State, Distrili & Office Soupht I ________________ y. year)

A lEnvelopes Unli-mited, Inc. Durenberger for Senaterq-49 N. Horners Lane 1Iinesota Enrvelopes 9-7-78 1

L>gockwville, Xaryland'20850

Aocrepaie General ElIllcr Expendillurevkfor Thill Candiaiae - S 4 ~ *~ _______________________

~%PFull Name, Malarec Aooress and ZIP C.ode Name of ?eoeral C.andicai Si;):orie.. Pariizuigrs o' Ezx~ncoure Date Iemoritn, AmjOf Each Payee Stele, Distric.T & Office Souch. I coy. year)

Cc" unication SpecialistsJInc. Texans for Tower-P. 0. Box 1529 Texas Printing serv-,ices -17652,1EAustin, Texas 78767

; ui Namet, Main;m. kocfess e Z IF Coot NIrmec r- errri Cz.nc,ozie t otc Friu C ar Jt .a~a~~

:-c '-. icebanl !;! for Sen-:EZ CC).192 1 Tv-4ggs Co-ne7 be 36rse c:-zc~ S e7?eaCh:trEE Cv e -

sjcE'CO.AL C' e:,r1C1uC1Tr :,?0i ic:')lior .

(L-r O zFrr

. r t -ffrol. Is"o'

L C. 'C,3

0~ iN L 5 E C L ) IDA0%T S F 0F6 rD --F, ".L 0F F IC E

~Di;L t -L . or~

(Tv~ W4 usc only by FPoltarl 0- '~ r~1frV on It's C-eu,.eal El~ci it-n)

lii, a 9 IL. I s~ii..

Name, vs 1-01111"Ia Commits,., in l Ull

National Republican Fsenat c:-iol Cc--- tee-Expendi.-Areohias your Committe. bcn oesugruated 1o make cooosratee excrencitures tty a Political rparry comnrniiiee? ~ L~ SC11 YES, namne the oesionating commine-e 0, P ',d 1n or ResDect Nre State Co---ttees ____

Full Name. Mafing Aicoress anrd ZIP CAo. Name of Feceral Canuoloaue $.upporlec. last sculaan of Eenclourt Wit Imon~n Im M.of Each Pay.., State. Dirint & Office Sovlt Cay. year)

The Y.-rti Comnpany People for Boschvit.- Media Advertising 9-12-78 25 2to07801 M'etro Parkway Minnesotahiinneapolis, 11Qnnesota

55420

A99" ~cte General Eire.iorl Expenotturt________________________________ v h~$canditale - S ",- ( T

Full Name. Mailing Acooressi ano ZIP Coots Name of Fecral Candicale SupooneC. Farticwlars i ;-&pl ilr Cait (mo~nth, A r)C) J:.

L____o______ Each____________________ Sta te, D'strictI & Of fice sovah _______wear)__

David R~. Ault Cohen for Senator Political?%. 0. Box 19.38 Xaine Consultz=.: 9-12-78 2.Portland, Mlaine 04104

" te~it General Elecion Exzaendilur

4ull Nene, NUclinp Aecress and ZIP code Name of F eopral Candicate SwuJDored. Particular-% of r.xpenoiture Date (month.* Arricoun!of Each Payee State, District & Office Soucht C.2y. year)

~ aeJohnson Cohen for Senator P1~iap. 0. Box 19038 Maine Consultamt 9-12-78

(Portland, M~aine 04104

Aporeo31e General ElcinEx-.endsiuvet

for this Ceandicate - Sull Name. Mailing Aoore-st and ZIP Code Name of Peerral C-pnocjte ScjoDoriec. Pariacujlafs c! izx:enoizure Dale lmonir.. Amrnor

of Each Paye-e State, Distrli & Office S-ouceat ca year.

T asA. Dzffron Cohen for. Senatorl:i~P.0. Box 1938 ~ie -Co-su 1z::E: 9-12-78 2,9

Portland, Maine 04104

4o rc-ae "sora I:,r Urctr

FuVll Name, t.,ahinc. Aocress ian: ICo Npr C, Fe;rrr C.?nosc.-111 ic, fat~lr~C£~tr .cr~ct

cf EActh Payee &~e 0r r1 f 1cf SDUt C e

Robert S. Tvrer Ooh2 c~: Sersa:c: o1:F.0. Box 10938 neC nS 1 z 9-12-7E

F C)r tan CX .i n e 04104

I Ac~rr:~'tr , flZ zC.Jt

r' r~C.-czv - ~SCf7&~./(Sj E C 7t,'- c' e 3L tue In'$ Dac! lcc rl

7C7. ;nt Ih,$ lizsl Wo' Inq line nvm~r or"'.

(S U "" ":,Ii u L'-j, -) , CE Ci ur 13)

(To I-* used only by Vlit-r-l omn~ r'It- Cen.,al Liav,.04)

rName of l-ulssicjl Commitlei in k l

LNationa~l Republicanr SC-,ztC71012 CC7.t- ;c~~ue

I*%*$ your Committee bc~n OcM19mrate-d to maibc cooroirbatec, exp~neltures Dy a Ci01iticjl r.PPTy comm~,ile".' Y 'N

If YES, name the oesipale ommitTe Revuhliczn 7;rtjona1 end/c: ResDective State Co- it6teesFull Name, Madung Aooraa on(: ZIP Coot Nome of Froeral Cano-clate 5-woD)oftc. -aricuiv-, of Ejzr-enoIjwft Oalt smomm. Amun

of Eachs Payee Stute, Distrin & Office Souvvft Czy, year)I

Susan X.L Collins Cohen for Senator P oli t ical IP. 0. Box 1938 1 aine Consultant 9-12-78 $ 90Portland, XaLine 04104

Aoorrecaie C6eierzoi Elr:iior Exo~endlituref V'rt I S Ca dr, F ir - F Y'. - 7 ( '5 " I -I

Full N ame. m..ling koorest ant ZIP Coc jName o! f-eoeral Cajrrccaxe Sup~orneC. j Prittcuiai of ixoencorurrre Dat(month. Amoun;

of Eachi Fayee Staic. D11ricl & Office Souothi I y. year)

om.as R. Bright Cohen for Senator Political 4

0. Box 19038 Yzine Consultant 9-12-78 1130~ortland, Main~e 04104

.~~~ ~~~ Aggre-paie General Elcto Pat cuii f xpnrtre Ou mot ,e

Ivfor this C-endi.aie - _________I___I_____

fFL-11 Name. Mli Acoress and ZIP oc Name of Federal C&1.azit Su~ooruted, Prsuaso -xecor mrI~t. Aon

A) of EahPMe State. Distric, & Office Sowohl ________________ coy, yea1

: ational Direct Xail Citizens for P,!-cy (

q . ervices, Inc. Illinois Direct ?z;i1 service 9-12-78 38

2233 Wisconsin Avt..,N. W.5 Iuite Op400e~ashinstons D. C. 20007 Aoe.t eea 'ceoE~neu

C- ic~~~~~~~r this C.Anerrdae-s' '9: I __________

"It'ui Name, Mailhng Aoress anf: ZIP Coc Nime fol Pecieral Cjrroc-alt SuoooneC. Parisc ulas ol ;.A:>emoiwre Dal OuImonirr. 4Aoun't

of Each F-ayee Sitl Disirici &Office Souph'. I I year)

1Baxter for Senate j4- zBa>ter- Sec.L-41 n,::bui

Suti te 4,6 2 'U. S. Senate r9-12-78 510(1 neenec 1~l Delaware

~ingonDela-warei iCV m i'i C.Anc f l0t tf- (7 ) / /

;L1 :, ~c l..in ooress anC Z2I Coot NPrnr C, ecorral c-'knoc2le o 'i.r, c ' Osr L.il Ieron~u. Amcu,r

c' Eictr. Payee b1t Durc &0ilc! i Ci .

TJhe Rocbert G006:on Azcnicv

12 1Vesz Rezd Street M~ze for L1. .west \ r~Lr~-a

Sc.:e AV 7Z 2r

1c,~ ri ~rr~ ':c zr'~

jEC AL. C' f :'-:,rt~i

7 07 L4. ur, t >r, SI~ o-o' r.'i57 .~'C

I -L r- IA I;L It '

Let C. C t

IULI I IL./-~.L I I-%r-~ I I ~.A...'hbI.3hI I I L~.. %Ji~ .. /...3I4.~,*#%*L~.d ~ *

c 6L or ,I r ~~~fATEF 0 R F[DU. I ortr cr

(Su))ring L -L?4 F Form rr

(T v b* u" d onl y by P 01 tici I -MMrno"i n theb G &?-Of I E IVCIOpj

Name of I-ol,i,rai COMMult, ,rl pull

1tionzl Repub licn.n Senator-.ial Cotee- Expend turcs

~1youl C..rnmitTt loeM ft1PSeIptIO 10 m&t coordinated exPenditulres by & Politicul parrv commint? r- y Es N UC

If YESnarme the Oe1;ortatl1necOmiT1"e evub 1ican Nat ionaI and/ or Respect 4ve Ste Co=;tt eesFull Name. IW4aeIon; Adores$ eri ZIP Code Name of Feoeral Ca.nocatt SUPDOfleC. Farxicuiars of Eaptndiiurt jDate tmontlh. Amount

of Each Poyet S-.aie, Distrme & Office Sough~t 4 JY. v ear)

Al Siin-pson for6 Senate Al SimpsonP. 0. Box 1978. V. S. Senate ScL4.Cnr- 9137 50

Cody, Wyoming 82414 Wvoming bu-6i on

[ 4ipe c~ar enera: Eie-zicir Ezx-tndolurefort his C.-nddi e - S I ,L ) (_t

FulName. Maulai Acoress and ZIP Code Name of Peoeral Candicate Su:)porlee. Forliculars. of Expenotiure Wut Orion h. Amount

1 IIof Each Fayee I State, Distric & Office souchl w y. year,,

j.Th e M-arti Company People for Boschwritz Ypdia Advertising 9-13-78 1.5,OC

7801 Metro Parkway i n ne so tannepolsNinnesota

55420

Agorepate General Election Ex-endeiure

$or 'his Cnd'Oale - S -7) ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

iLlNae iln cruadZPCce Name ofeFederael eCelo su*Or, c. Particulars of Expenoiture Dale (monlth. Amount

SBaxter for Senate Jim Bax>-ter Sec.41 l l

CCISuite #62 13. S. Senate Contribution 9-13-78 5,0(

f..naepenoence Mall Delaware

EWi lmington, Dela. 19803

Aoorewiae General Ele-iion Exoend,ture

10of 1hi Cndii. - S 4 < -. , () -_____________

r%4 ull- Name, Maiing Aooress anda Z IP Coot Name of Federal Canocae SwDoDonec. 1aiscujas c' :z~enoilur te tmonril. Amoun,,

of Each P'ayee Stale. Disirict & 011icL Socnth I O?. year)

Eiumphrey for Senate . Gordon FR=?hrey. Sec. LLlQ1-7 1P. 0. Box 28 'U. S. Senate jContribut6ion9-3750coocor6, New Hamnpshire Ne-v% Rampshire

03301

A6'eJ1 ( er. l Cic- Cf :.rcowe I

te 11,111t CPnolcptl - /-f0C.?It- c, L~O C i t : zerou.rt :). ICVp)1. i or

I Ful cotjs rcZ IP Coot Npm 0l rc~r eoev 1?1 - .~ LII Nie l.,dinc Acess~rtC32,

1 eAc-tnace~en:: CC.

5660 S. S.recuse Circle~ -~~o.Cclor~do

S 1 ,r

Ar. =,Sr:o ng v uZ7., 1E~C i -t e e c_:_ce S:;ace

- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti c1I3 ic- yOna. mrn1 rci I......

oC- 7E

; t - L ,, i '.'A . l' ' . ' f v f M 5

it , loon Lrifrnrtern

cIte ~~Dk! £3EAL F OF CANDIDATES FOR~ FEDE[F-/AL OFFICE

(10 L-4 ulc cervic b~ ei c 1,11 vem ie n lite Cerral Eloc~su,,)

I "." :1'1, lI JL'cr) .

Narvor of I'iete;a: C.O messe en F ull

NztionzlRepulbican Senatolri~2 Co-

l"s yourf Comnmettee beens oesegnatvd to Make COoroenatc expenoetufes ty a p~iiiiC..h par-Ty committee? Fz YE NO1f YESnmamre the oeionstime conmener! r, -'. ~ i~ r.,.. I... 1 ; V -~ 4 0% 1- .4 v -x.t -0v ~~tes__Full Namre. MailinG Aoofeu area ZIP Ccoot Namne of Fe'oeral C.anodjte Svoprornec. Fartecuears o0? Expenoeture Diatt imonitr. Amount

of Each P""vu State, Districi & Office Souchit ICay VL~ar) ______

Taurus' Producthions Ar=Strong Campaign ?roduction service .2502 E. Pikes Peak Ave. Cc =,t: 6.e e Aor television 9-13-78 2,86-Colorado Springs, Colo. Colorado

80909

991reoae General Election Exrencli t

Full Namne. M~'ailing A00ress anZ ZIP Coot Namne ol iFeoeral Canoicate Su:Por Ie C. Particular$ of iz oenolturt bat imonth. Amoun.of Each Fayee i Stalt Disifr & Off ice soucrit cay. year)

DOecision M~aking Armstrong Campaign Foiling 9-13-78 18,00~nformation Cc ittee~uite 1'800 Colorado.2700 N. 1-1ain Street(;anta Ana, California 9270 qepiGnraElconxe 1e

__1:!6 _____P_______or___This____ CandiCate - S

0', Full Namet hlalieng Aooress and ZIP C.oce Namne of Feoeral Canoecaile Supporstec. j amtcular-, ol Exzenotere Dalt lmnonte. Amount

lies of EAch P-2yer I Stalt Disrraci &Otffece Souoht 60. year) _______

-,±aIleas fo Advertising,lnc. A-~strcng Campaign Advri s in& 9-13-78 169

ruite i-290 Cor~i-6-4ee Production,N1715 Fonterey Road ColoradoI 'tolorado Springs, Colo.

80910 Aooreoate General Elecison Excenooetr

for this C.?ndicat! - S ________0__10____f__

JLaINaome, Mailing Adireis and ZIP Code Namne ol Feoeral C-noicate Suoortec. F-ariicuiars c' Exenmture CD;*. lmontr. Amour.,

of Each Payee I State, DistreCI & Office S0600hi cp.V".

Cotrell Printing Azrrstrong Cz-=paign r:Yt,-ing ser-vices 9-13-78 0C6701 South Emporia Co- -itte--.eeEnglewood, Colo. 80112 Colorado

I4pprecaie Cernr~i - ci cr

;U1I Niemt, M'allon; Ocfess Prc "l; Coot I kamen c! Prorri C.noci In~ce: vae~h' r~OUt ar re~

Ea 1?c trvr~~.'ca SCa'F -7. C S& A.

?'30~ Cnrail &Fr*- AScO: Eh C-~c~ e~ g e s:-t -

Ne - York, N ev Y.rk 10 019 Colora6o

IC r~Cnz '-S>~ ~

S~EC7 AL C! eC.nuC ' ?'etori.C

Z7A L the! r C ', 1~$ 12' F' I e u i r% 1

t'..)L I I I G -L. r /.k I .,U I 'lf(Vil I I L J3 U M .)I U I Y I LU PJ-. uL I% I jjI

rt c'~ r c . tANllt'1 1[ r ovi r r() c~ 0

~~or~in~ ~24. F EC Form ~

(Toa 1:-- Lus~o only 'y Poiitt" a .erm mw i'e n ihe General Eo.ctilont

tape ~ cf...j....

Name o 01 1C.&gt.Cj 0mmeut in~ F UlJ

National FRpbii-cz~ Scnztcr~a Co-*ite-7>-penditures1'ais yovir Conmitt tnten oesigntec io maike ccooronsteo expectures byy a PolitecaI parry conmri"? YES 0N N)If YES. nlome th l-inln commian. Nas:c-a Zpd/Or Fes~eCt've State Co,-itteesFull Name, Mailing Accir0. and ZIP Coot Name of Fie->ra; C.anocate Su:*orlec. Fa&8VicV&*I of LxCindsIUVI CDhII tleioflh Amount

of Each Pavet Sthle, C'stric-, & Office Soucht day, irtar) I______

Dialco--, Inc. A-ritrons Ca=pzign Computer services 9-1-3-78 $ 1131110O1 Spri;ng Street C c-4.t te eSilver Spring, haryland Colorado

209 10

A qrecptt G.en~eral Ehe.lior. EA~eriasurt

Full Namne. Mailing Adores,. anl ZIP Cooe Name C11 reoerjs CaicirSw:ored. orlicularl ol it;)cnollurt J zi One onth, Amount,

of Each Fay"e Slate. D),tri~l & Office Sovahl - _______________ Oy. year)

C/ Byron Nelson Cc=-t 1:e e2013 Cedar Springs Road ColoradoDallas, Texas 75201

A9orec~aie General Elect on Ex:>enoiturefor Ths s~rcjc~ - q : ) Q ______

1 ull Namne, hlailinp Aooreu. and ZIP C.ooe Name of Ft-erai Canbicae Sup:orted. Farticuim oi iz~kno1urt Oaw (mont. Amouniof Ea.1h payee I Stale, Disirin~ & Office Soucht Ca.ya) ______

our ational Direct nail Armstrong Cz~paign Direc-42. i ser-vic

evices, Inc. Coi--ee 93-87,16'Suite If"400 - Colurado

C2233 Wisconsin Ave.,N.W.

a singonD. . 2007 Agorecale Ge.neral Eleciton Ex~end lure

to- This Cjand'dj,. 041 1 ~114wlName, h.lis AcoressaeZI ~o Nam 0, Oeora Cawi Sw~orleC. 0.is wis s .0edur .. alt(otr. ew.

of Each Pavee SIMIe. District & Office SOU;fs Orv. year)

Astrong Cap-,aign . t.togSec. VI

Co ittee U. c. Senate C onr -L' 1)uton 9-1.3-78 l.5soc

-5680 S. Syracuse Circle Colora6o?1lazz South BuildingEngewood, Colo. 60264 ______________

Oir 'r . nete -S'Ie i -1 K

01..l Npame. Wllln ;,Doreti ?ac ZIF o Coos - o', err' I.io~ I,~cic In Fr-ci.t-% i. irin~ C) w

0.Bc,: 28CCc-c)rc, N1 'e-.

S en a te

1 a S " -- re03'30

7 0o: :hey

I -.

7 :, . .~'i 7'~ C- n Vi n e C

* )C "U4 G~ 3

Sec. .L-C 1o.~

I ,.. rn.w. r;o: ~ C'Fc;.'~1DT ~ FO E~L CTFIC

CIL "V :, FEC Fr L )

(To t-0 Ubad F.r 011b LAacI - 'Trrrnr qSe in 1014 Con.'al Fec

( L"'? j4, i : ;-Ur- 3

..aFrlf of Politic.al Committee in Full

National Republican Scnztc-r_.a'- Co --tee-Eyvc-: .tures

hias your Committee bpeen oC1ipmelett to make cooroinvtec r xcenoitures bry a political P.arTy c.ommrne.& YES N CD

if YES. norme the oesiOamion comnmirtee: .q.1 .- t 5 .A/ ~ ~ Se~C~ t

of Eadti 'ayet State, Ditrici & Office Souvtmt eay. yearI

Baxter for Senate Jim Baxter Sec. 441"

Suite V 62 . T. S. Senate Contribution 90-13-78 S 5,01

indepeno6ence YMz1l DelawareW il.inston, Dela.'are

19803Agpreojte Gemerai Eie-tior, Ezenomure

for 1his C-adicale S LI' ( (

Full Norme, Mailin: Aactress and ZIP Cooe jNamne of Feoeral C.anoocate S-azporlec, j arfticuiar- ol :x.enosiure Dat imcinir.. I Amnowr

of E.ach Poyee State, District &o Office Souh CAy. year)

'0R. J. Sann & Associates Ka ns a ns f or Ka s sebaum Media Advertising

163 0 9th Avenue Kansas 9-87 590

New 'York, Nen. York 10036

Aoioree,.ae General Election Ez.~endiiure

lor This Cncioate - S ___ __________

1rulf Nane. t.'ailin; Acorezs and ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeral Candoiate Supporied, Partaculars of Exrenoiturt Date IMOntt1. 0kmoun

of Each Fpy" Stale, Cotstrict & Office souopht day, yea() _____

Wendt Advertising Williams f or Senate Media Advertising

' .0. Box 2128 0~tn -67 6,4

Great Falls, Yzntana59403

Aggvecaie General Eitecoon Ezxcinditurt

for his Crdand , - S /_______________________

N..Full Name, Maim; Aoclre-ss arc ZIP Cooc Name of Froeral Cjnoicate Sv~orit, Fa riicuiar-s c' E;aD-ndiiure [)&t Imonth. ;A mour

4,of Each Payee I S-,ele. Disiric. & Office 5<u#~ cv, yea''

Smith and Rarroff, Inc. Cohen for 'Senator -Fi :- ? oC3uc t io n

9 22 Fennsvlvania Ave.,SE Y~ine c- 1-9-76 ,


01 NjiNme. Nl~jatruc Aooress arnc Z IF Coot Nirmr c! reoe2? C?rre:! c.rt: LF't-#c~?jf i I!~iut I I ,nr

co'Mc Par Faee &~~.Dsrc

L L3 Zesz 77th' St.>n~ea?~.~, Ynnesot z

5 5 435zrC I .n , T f r c - : -

ZLjrTCA1 _7 Ck.1ruCl*FeS lhts :-aICCt

A~. is le: - :: In' it i rm.rr yi ) n

inc t ag~-- ?E-K

V E S

(~u~crlrl~ ;'~*'.., ~C F 011ff l

(1a, tit usec only byp PCulos-l1

-- rrti in 't't Co.al I l.cia.r.)

It Lfii .4, 0 1C ;pf 3

Name aof ~litical COmil~et in~ Full

Natjonzl. Rc-publiczn c cri1C- c-. c:ue

Has y0601' Committee teen ciesinate-c 10 mabte cooroineirc e~cenoijuret ty a polf*.cal wary comrnmue-r' L Sr L NU

11YESnpme he oeionatinccmile ?CubMiM. Nptciia c:,cresnec-, e St at e Cc -itees ____

Full Name, Maailn; AOOarimu and~ ZIP Coot Name of &eral CnoiCaie SUPOorled. Feia r c !f C' aoencliturv D?.J Imonlrbt.1 Amon

of Eachi Payee State. Dirtrict 6 Office S.ou 9hI~ Cat, year)

Daniel s & Associates Yartin for U.S.Senate Media A.vertising 9-19-78 $ 25900L02 Office Park Drive AlabamaSu ite V 1l10Birngham, Alabama

3 5223 iAQoeple General Eoez:ior, Ex:,enoiturt

for Int Cjr,bCe - F~ e _________________ _______

Full Name. Malfin; Aootess ano ZIP Coce rqzme of Feeoeral C.Jnooafse SuD~ioriea. F-ar ticuio of EipeAcl~urt Lflit trnontih, Amnounij

of Each Payee 5181t. District & Office S-owori I c . yeai)

SNorthw.est Bell Telephone(Co-.Dany Durenberger for Senate Tele?hone service 9-19-78 35

1432 Soo line Building M~innesotai~mnneapolis, Minnesota

55402 4ooreoiate General Election Ex.>encliure

for This Cndule- 30 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

r, u5 Name. Nmjiong Accoess onc: ZIP Coot Name of Federal Canoicite Svpooned. Farticular of Expenditure Dale (monmr. Amount

of Each Payee State, Distric., & Office S.oupht I cy, year) ______

~Shasteen for Sen~ate Don Shasteen Sec. 44120760S820 South 13th Street U.S. Senate Contribution 9-207 ,

,Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Nebraska

C)Appreoate General Election ExperiaI ture

fc" This CM an.t ______________________ _____

F'ull Name. Mailinc Aocress ano ZIP Cooe Name o' Feoeral cano~wie suo~iortec. Fviscviars of Exo.nooure Dale Imonv% h*or

of Each PL -ee S ieDitc &offieSuh i.ya)Amu

raul F. Ov~ersaard .-

Greenbriar Apartmnents D-,i7Enberger for Senate Thlitical 9-20-78

10401 S. Cedar La-ke R6. ~ Tneso.-aCnsig

Y..nnetonka, Minnesota55343 ______________

Ic"cf CCner? t . X C n L

011l tfirnt. W,'ainr ACcess finc. IF Coot rvr c *ot O.oCcS: ri:, rv!- t_,n.CI IC- =L M: noLr ow to-r

0! Eicr Pve! ti it: A !, cf So~Vt.

6300 York: Ave. ,S~r

:~> n he sc z 5~A

-- e7 SCr

A. I. e o: "V1 D-ic in. .r~ nvjr-):er c

qe ,'C .e ,,~'rt 1:*

2 C. -7 E

C,. C.i (

ON 5£EHAL F OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERIAL OFFICE

(u pp om Iric Lin( I , F EC Fo rm r;

17 o W~ us-ed only ety ProIoi,rtl r rri'wim.o-s in tam. Cote'al ( loit-hr

has our Commiltt DqnO11nIC1 ik:CoonjCtpnijrtty&pllca a~ .m~l" )IIf YES, name the oeeinal in:comrti" - Re'Dubl1cqan, Nz!#.ona! and/or Respec:jve Ste06t. Cc_itteesFull 84ame. Mailing Acorist ani: ZIP C-oor Namne of Fe-cral Cjnocalt Suvpored. Particuilars of Eapmenollure uJdt Imonth. Amoun!

of Each Fayte State. Ois :rin 1. Office Sought I_________________ j .y. year) ______

Southtcr-m Office Park Durenberger for Senate Rental - of fice 9-20-78 1 16'8120 Penn Avenue, South -i nne sot-6a SpaceBloorington, Minnesotz

55431Acore~ate Gseneral Eie-uton Ex~prnciture

i c' this C..?ndicals - S '_ ~ ______________

Full Name, &aihnc AclcresAi anc -',IF Coor Nta e 01 ieoeral (%noicaie SuD:orit. Fa rticUlilrl 0! ;iL:enoosure Dale (mo-ntrh, Amrrowr

of Each Payee State. District L, Office Souo"it I cay, vear)

'Roger Ailes. & Associates,:=n.Durenberger for Senate Xedia Consul.ting 9-20-78 9,5'

23 CentalPark South Minnesota - :caso xnsuc Dt mnh muNL-, Yrk NL.,York 10019

Aooisi Canll ZI CSo C. N5 meIull Name. WaiiE A e -is P a nd ZI S DN m fPoflCnicl wpnC at~lr fExeciue Dt m nh m

Charles R. Geer, Jr. Durenberger for Senate Fho0to0g r z ni c 9-20-78 26004 N. 19th Street. Minnesota S eric e sArlington, Virginia 222C5

Agorecate General Election Exoenditure

1c)' this Cadi~,t - V',LY7~ull Name, Maimi; Aocress and ZIP Cooe Nome of Feoeral Cano cie Svoonrec. rlicuiars 0, Ejxl:enotture Date smonih. Amour-

of Ea.-h Paver Stele, District &Olfice $o.,%Ih ep cy. year)

Lee CaliLff1802 FRackamo're Lane i a rne-. --or- U.S. Senate ?o2.itical 9-20-78 9Alexandria, Virginia 223061 Vtirginia Consultaz.:

UP i rlI ?me , W~.riic Aocrett aqnc Z IF Coot Nom c Peorrt C.pr~C"zu . occ F-1 - 'IC?- n' Z C r ~ ~ rC'n r.mU6,

-z c-E . V 1inI

Ac=707 0-r'ra e :7-t n P C

I : f L.00.# ;.4 . r kc I ("r., ?

~~~ Th~~~~~~ T 1I ALFTY C0,M,' ITT E 'S EIN~h)A.~~IS a

(2 U.S.C. 'rLl(6) , Line .. L .r

c0. DC, 7 0 C 3 (S u po ri n: L 4. FEC F 0rm 2)

(,To be usce! only ty PF)ol'"Ica in~ ' n the Gc"Ofial Elf-"t10n)

Name of P'olitical CoDrmence in Full

Nat ion a Pe-,u*- i can Sena-,oria I Cc-itt ee-Ex-eniures

hiat your COMmitite tbeen oesigrnalee to malet cordinsiec expencltures by a pofetec-aI Parry comrrie-e? YE5 to

IfIYES. risme th r~nln oniit Rryblcan Npjeong'. and/qr ResoDective -State Cci4ttees Aon

Full home# Waiting Address and ZIP CoOt Namet of Peocral Canoicatt SupcltcC. Iaticuiars of E.xpeltuft~ Dat ImrearAmw

of Eac PaeItt.DFrc,&OfieSo lcy er

John F. Buckley2662 Glengyle Drive Warner for 'U. S. Senate Political 9-20-78 90C

Vienna, Virginia 22180IS Virginia

A'ociec.aie General Elecxcror. Ex~enOliture

for 1h'i Caiercar - 7 P,

Full Name. Milling Aooreis &no ZIP Coot Name of Feoeral Candioait Sup:,oriec. P',rilculan c! zxri-neirure .iat! Ilmonin, Arri n

of Each Payee I State, -District & Office Sour'it ICaY. year)

tUPI, Inc.

Attn: Richard Ross Cohen for Senator Wire Serv.ice 9-20-78 727

1-20 Ashburtonl Place lMain e

4fBoston, *Massachusetts02108 Aggrepate General Election Expenditure

ifo ihis Csar,6cje - S ~ ~ / ,/-

_ull Namle. ?*ailing AOareru and ZIP Code Name of Feoeral Candicate SuooorteC. Far teculan of ExenoerureeDat(mon. Amoun

* of Each Payee Stare. Distric & Office Soh. ca3y. year)

0 rSD & Company, Inc.

S4050 - 41st 5:. ,North Warner &or U.S.Senate Design and

Arlington, VA 22207 -Virginia preparation of 9-21-78 301CFlyers

Apprep.aie General Eienrion Ex endowurt

for 'his Cand'a1C Se

-'Full Name. Mailinc kooreis and ZIP Cce Name of Fcea ciatS::ox: arcw rs0,.r>M1Ue Caeinnh Arnow-

of Each% paye"I Sae DISTricI & Olfice soucrel Co~y Yet',

Decision Makinginfo-at ion 'Presssler for Senate ~ ol~g9-21-78 4),

Suitel,1OO South Da'yotz

2700 N~. Main Street.Santa Ana, CA 92701i

4ot' rL~piCG nrrw ;itcipr, .- ,rnfo~iUr?

Full Namre W.aln; 4koore11 rrc 2fF 0! C~m Cl rr ,r C..? n ioc' c. C- I.r~lr rTe r)i A

c! Each Payef ~jr ~r~ '~ crZ..y?

7llnC'*Ic BEi1 7ipf0 CE.:2 :0 Er 7) C 71 e ServaicE

..25 VesF: ±a n o~ S.

Ciag , Fiin i e Ci60 'r)r11'I :rT! lcrZlc

S L' C.'' e~r R r T C

InC~r v~~ leas r Chi r, n

.;;cr*.In:: L F~ FC Furm r:

(7c. 1.i ut- o"'v' 1q Vi~is ovr~spp r. tq.. C-eeai I i4l(r

has Your Commilet toetn oesionated to mabhe cooroinpleo) ex erollures t'y a PoilticJi :;~~ ccwnm,:ie? YEIf YES, name the Oc .in Fctm'e e pub c n-, INF t nri,, anc5 o-. Re s ective S t a-4 e Cit t e esFull N~ame. Mailing Aootcu ano ZIP Coot Name of Perotral Canracte S-u:ProneC. Fa- ioculars of cxpenoIlure [)it, IMCjr, Amnown

of Each paye" Sltt, Chetic, & Of fiee S"OUCIP1 ty. )

Ylidwest Filn= Convany804 S. Phillips Ave.Sioux Falls$ South Dakotz

.57 104

Full Name. Mi*linc Aoores arc ZIP Coot

of Each Feyer

?ressler 'forSouth Dakota

Senate F 1-m Production

;-go'ecaie General Ete-citor) ;sL> Irfor this C-Pnictle - I "Name of reral C-ar,oi aje S~n:

State. DiStrict &. Office Socli

Con unications Corporatioiof America People -for Boschwitz Direct. 1hail

Direct Yzrketing Plaza Minnesota Srie'Boston, VA 2227 13Aggreoaie General Eleciko CA~enditure

for this Candicle 7 SU __ (\ ___ ___________

ull lName. WMalling Aooress and~ ZIP Coot Name of Frorra-l Caricoate Sw:)DorteC. &-aIiculan of cI~enclture

of Eaci F-ayet State. Districl & 01f it S-ought _______________

FWiland & AssociatesS219 East Davis St.MCulppr VA 22701-

Com=ittee forSenator GriffinFichigan

[Aoorepaie General Elecito Exl:persdiirefcr thi sC.i MdI a I o! - S i 5 .Z 6 V '(173

ul Name. Mailiric Adores% and ZIP Coot

e ~ of Each Pave-

Npmr~ 01 Deoera Cano uc

D ire ct Mail1Servij ces

irI C W;a Is 01 xgptlo I IUre tJZ1t Imonmh

% iversified Kail Co.,i&tee .-OrMa r ket ing Senator Griffin Direct Nal9-27-78 5,8090 Camerom Street 1' chigan S er-v-i7ce sAlex a nd ri-a, 2 2 3)14.

r wAi Npmt W.'aiiinc okcorrs pc 2 IF C''O N t CI ; eorr.- C'Pr-;e CL.7.C.1iC(.~r ~ it~ e~t mu

c! EpL-!. Ppe' I $u*sr~60ft~c~ e'

Minnesotaz D:systc-e nc~750 N crt-l A=z Erive Er~~~ rS~~c Cz:::s::c -- 6.

n eS Z 5 36 1e Se C:: I

.cF7 74' c''~zi v-

7 i -% L C: 12!t C.- 0! 1r f) ! r

.4 .22

LA1 t i on VV1

9-22-78 $ 50

22-78

1000

I Arnown

M M --- - I ---- - I I

I

N I t i 0 1, .7 1 C tlub I i c ? --, S r n.- C7 C -::77 t C T 1: 1) C 1 6 11 r IF.

tI V r

Ie( C 7,iCAG3,

(To bet urn-d only by PoliticalI Comirnme.-1 on the G.oi~rrtEIcil n

POLITICAkL I' "SI Y CMlTrVOR DErlGNATE ;7) GEN'T(r)UN LI,( I ICt~)~A QJL *I!C

(S u ppo riI ng L'; !, :', F ECr For.m 3)

National Republic~n Senzn:orial C_-_4tee-7>edt reslhas Your Commiseee be-tn oiesimatec to make cooroinaleco expenoitures Dry a political r-arry comminl.. YES ~ N11 YES. nafne the mi ion at in 0cor mitr-_ cz _Naaon nd/or Res~ect4ive State Coir-AteesPull Name. Mailing Address and ZIP Cooe Name of Feocral C.ano~catr Suep~orltee, Fariculan of iti enoriout Wit: imonth. Amrount

of Each~ Pay"e Stale. Districl & Of fice Sowcoll I _________________! dy. Year)

B~reLvrneAssociates Waner for U.S. Senate Political Consult- 4Virginia ing L Fzoagement 9-22-78 5 00

P.0. Box: 485 ServicesAlexandria, VA 22313

Agoprepate General iectoori Ex;;nnlgrr

Full Name. I.ailhn; Aooiress and ZIP Cooe Name 01 l-eceral Gano-cate Supl~orlec. Parleculart of ExOenoiturt L.Jat Iminsr-,. Amnoun:.

of Each Payee Stat, District & Office S-ouor I oy, year)

'-P-utomated Business Yzi1 Kansans for YKassebaum Typing services 9-25-78 . 5525515 Li*vingston Rd., S. E. Kansas,

Cvtashingtoln,D. C. 20021

A~~'aeGeneral Electio? Extoenoiiu!)e~

N.~) Name. ma.iing Acloress anc ZIP Cooe Name of &e-jeral Canoioate Si4~oorte;. j ariocular ol Exsxnoiture Date 1mcwntri, Amountof Each Payee Stae. Distract & Office Sou;Ht Glya, year)

American Fhailing List Citizens 'or Cochran Dre ctYi 9-25-78 1,87_4l777 Leesburg Pike Xississippi ServNices

0 ~jalls Church, Virginia22043

Agorcate General Election Exp-nditure_______________________110!_to this Cart&cate - S /1 'I. 7 ,

Full Name, Maaln; Acoress and ZIP Cco Nam Fe ci erI CanolmAfs Suc:orsec, Pat cull's o! Exroenoure Date lmontri Amnoun:,o' Each Payee State. District & Office cSouoYear

Smith and Harroff,lnc. Cohen for -Senator .-I=h produc :ion 9-25-78 7 , 5922 _Pennsylvania. Ave. ,S E v-- iin eWashington, D.C. 20003

Aoorewit Cenrw ra eci Cr a.mctr

ul V1 P-nr. l.',piiic Aooress ?nc ZIP Cci I Npmet c! ecer?: C,nc4:c'. Sc: e -? Cua C.' ~ c" Lill ~ iroC,:n

EC-aZev F c:, inc. C~ie cS 50 dhr A%,en ue S e n a C Gifi ZEi C~ffe 7-77 L,

.. ~Ycri-., N e - Y cr 1 10C ichia

Ic 7,i C~iz nrr -ir S I :' p 1. '1 -

7 T .. ZC-c Mi line''r rw tr oniiC v?

FeC C, I~ p

?I'vort of lVCiijtCu C&,mme:tiec in F ull

* ' I.

A. ~

L~ .4 i~9 ('II~ by1 Poll1stLAl :. ,M IM rt"SI t, t C, t ,ra IL E..C .

t'.ame of F'oigtcaf Committee in F uil

Na t io na I F Cp;)u '1i -.C 0n S C -Iatc' .-*- r -- , ? - "4 4uLres$'%&I Your Commiirtt bt>n ooeignateo to Snaie coooinatec expenoitures D'y a Polii -r Commle.& Y *tE So

L--20eheion1ncom~~e 4 ra a n c/7 7es -)e c ie Sta: r Cc -4tteeFull Namei, maien; Adoress ana ZIP Cooe Name oil Feoeral C&noCAte SuoorieC. Particuianl -0f Exp~enditure Daitt Imontl.,. Amountoif Eacht Pay"t I stete, Oustrict, & O1ice s4uh jy er

Inst4.tu-uional Sales,Inc. Durenberger for Senate Office furnishings 9-27-78$ 382295 University Ave. I.i nn es o --aSt. Paul, Xinnesota 55114

ji A goe cje Genreral Eie-:to? Ex:encjiurt

10, This Candcate SC'(F~l I~e Ma~ir ooritand ZIP Cooe Narme of F-eoeral Can~caic S/4pporiec.

of Lanr Payee I .'l DtSIFr, & Cilp C- h

X, eyers & Associates,Inc."P12101 - 12th Ave., SouthI unsille, Mi11-nnesota537

Durenberger for SenateMlinne sot a

Fariiculars ct -- :)

Printing se:

enctitr L~sit Imonir, Amroun;"~Y' year)

rvices 9- 27- 78 1, 64:

Agoprecqaie General Election E pendslure

'LINam t~lncAcoeusan fo 1L is irii ndicp - S -- I~ .' 1 12-. 71 N m . o'alic cces ndZP Cocoe jName of Fecoeral Ca-m si Swpre. Frousso tiniure Dale (month3A fEah vpee State, D.istt.Ci &x Of fice Soucft I Cly. year)

a'Roger Ailes & Associates Durenberger fcr- Senate230 Central Park South Mimnesota Media consultjng 9-27-78

'pew York, 21;ew York '10019

r(' Aoecaie General Elecion Ex.oencliure

for ihis C.An6~oall- ! 5~~ea$" sn cLiurm-1 .nu I OO Jo Nrne of f-ecoeral Canotiae oOre.

of Each~ Payee Stare, Dsti. & O1fice Soivnr

A, vert is ingBox 2128Falls, Mzntana

5 940 3

Willias .for Senate1-n ta m a

A-00'ecsir Gvnri ie'in Lit

VaK 0 n cacre anc Le

s* e: :C~n-sLn

RC -le C E: 20 E5 0

.rij;.' C'1 Sp 0fe Dtrr:r 6Orr u"

C.e n s 7t~s s

F -A L C' r:. rLt

1I s O;. is p f I C:nI-C

F CF : r~ >A U~ r ~F lr

(> ;Y; 10 f. 'Ld)

W~endtP. 0.Gre at

Amount

11to0CC

*?i- year)

~e~i A&'r~isrig 9-27-78

At mount,

25,;0C)C

mn 0 Li n

-E-

I

1i p V1 1 7 1 r

-Clo . Ve?.

16 F1 -C r-

C

E i C E C) CIN

'*~l C. ~'i

I .. i&. Ii~.,L P~lb aI ~ i' II L L.%j i.d 11 L.,'L .bI U I I L Ld .4.% ~( ~ F OF CAtNhIDA~sr FnP F I,,B~ or rME

W C~ U.S.C. '41.(d))V(upur~rauL'' 24, FE C f-crrii~

(I o tis uted only by Political L nrrimi sin the ogenril LlociourI

I I.m -o*io~lmal Committee in F oll

Nt

L st- 'ie I F cv,

H~al you( C0ommgti b~een mo pnaleC to make coorosnatec txpencitures by a poitical ParTY COMM111ce? YEIt YES. name tht oletionatino ccm e n )d / o r respective St a te C o = cit te:e

Ful Man.Nilins Aoorew~ oneO ZP Co rnofFe-ceral CadiaeSD;inC. enulrofEenlrt De mi. A utFull of Each Payee Stait DistTrCn & Of fice Soupirt d________________~ ay, year) I______

Envelopes Unlimited,lnc. I'Znsans for Kassebaum Envelope Stock- 9-27-78 $ 43816149 N. Horners Lane Kan sa sRockville, K) 20850

i ec?,rt e Genera, ie~o z~n~______________________________for This C..ndcire - Sf>2

i;uli Name. Mealing Address anid ZLIP Coat N~me of eotr&; Carlo~lte Supporiec. Parm~ulars Of l-&enoijure Dire lmori. Arnour-,of Each Payee State, District & Office Souoh-: Vto~yer)

,,L Printing, Inc. A=-Strong Campaign Printing services 9-27-78 507P.O Box 8090 Co~ittee

,jouthwest Station ColoradoWashington, D.C. 20024

Aacrepate General Ele-tmon E xpenoiture

lot this C.AnirC.l - S ige

ull Name. WMajinc Acore-s anie ZIP C.ode Name of Fecral Conopate Suoooriec, Particulars ol. Exc)enoiure Date (moriri. Amountof Each Peyee State, Districi b Office Soueh: cry. Year) ______

-3 Research, Inc. Bell for Senate 'Voter Study 9-27-78 1,2501;89 Franklin Turnpike Co ittee.,,idgewoodl New Jersey -New Jersey

07450

dr, Aoorecpate General Election ExPenituref or this Conridcsil :2' 5______

A'Wuvl Njimt. Mauli; Aoress anc ZIP Coot Name of FeOerI OCaniocaie S'u:)onec. rarlaculars 01, EAL:'eflrt Date (moninrI, Amountof Each Payee Stier District & Office Souort fCry. year)

12 West Read Street S en ator Gritffin

.. aiiore, K)D 21201 _ZcnlganI

;AO:'etre (.,nrerv ienio- E oenioure

.jli! brant, w.~oin; ;Aocress anc ZIF Cone Nvnt- o! or C.Einocczi S6;::ocre:. v-arcL,2-1 C' &1 z- ".Vrt L..4tt A. rrorrr

ic E7 Aie s C so~a~ S. E-~c 2c~ Snze E ea C C6,1CanK20 CEnta 1 a~ SC.';

E~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 7 C7 7- r,', u'-"" :ifi

I L)LI I Il...p.%L I '~I' I '1 L.Y~ let) A I Lu..) Ur~ ~ I LU AuLr*~

C r.C1. V."

(To bq ui..c oroy by Paigtc"I - ommri ini tip Geeral Eiei..ci-)

Orl- LI@ FCIF VciC 1T 0)Di F U[ V O IC ('

~u~Ur~t~L -)v 24, F _C Fc).mr',

Nameto ol i0tiral C-ommgnse-e On F ull

Naticne.1 Tenblicr e-ra Cr'nte -E"n1~e

Hot your Commillee bmen oesignatto to make cooroenaleC excooue ia letca ~rycmitt1I YES. pme he es;rmatiee onmirr~e:R~b Natonal1F ano I 0r es c ve S1 aze Co=t t eeFull Nwmet, Mailing Aocreis and 21P Cooe Naime 0f Peclerai Ganoi..le SuppollIted. Particulars of Eapendeslurt D Late imon*in Aon

of Each Pwryet I State. District & office SOohl! I________________ I Cay. year) ______

R.obert R. Dahigren Brooke Comnmittee Political 9-28-78 1,53312 N\ Street, N. W. YMassachuseztts ConsultantWashington, D.C.

20007

_______________________________ for ihis C-1ndoae

Full Name. Maln; Alnoress anc: ZIP Coot Name of Fitoeral Cjo'C.aft SUPPoritc, Particulars of ;_xoenaltre :;., imonth Amountof Each Payee Stale. District & Off ice SOUC.)l I c ay r)

~'eadon Printing Warner for SenatL-e Printing9-87 2,(Services C o7-.ni-te e Services

0723 N. St.. Asaph St." Virginia'lexandria, Virginia

22314Aggregate General E e:iion tzipenoiturtlot rtt C.%ndo lt -I I

i Full Name, N'.ing Acores& aic ZIP Cooe Name of Fe-oeral C.aroicatt' Supporlee. Farliiculars ol Ez>enooire Dale Imontn.j A r mnof Each F-pyee Stale, DISTrict1 & Office Souoh d y yer) ______

C Sout,.bern Bell Re-Elect TLhurmond Teleohone 9I-28-78 5,411Cq Telephone C o:uT Li t t ee Services

VR 0. Box 6 86 South CarolinaColumxbia, S. C.

29215 Agoreejie General Eleciocn Excorndiivr!

__________ __________ _________ for this Canoic-ae - S 19-f 21, . _ _ _ _

,"'full Name. KMaiinc Aoc!Iss aic ZIP C.oot Name ot, Feceral Ciaruoease Sucicionec. I'arliculas 0, jzpencitlure Dilte Imont1h.mo

of Ea :h Payee State. DISTrict1 b Otffce S-ourpt Iy Year) A ou

The Keenan Oom~any Re-Zlect Thurmnond K ent" Z - 2.:iCef 9-28-78 47Keenan Bu-ild~na C o i it te e SDace

130 Lady St-reet- Souti-h CarolinaColarnb4i, S. C.

* 29211

.u~i tpmet .iru A;corIss aic. IP Cooe Nvn.re o' eoet .i' C t $ l, r c t C L!Lr ,~ ~ii%c! :a:? S,21!. : . 1 r 'e

S~::e 2 , :trzt I Co--zeSCe . 2 2~c 1 g S0z7 IaC.Z

16Bry ~~ RoadC)"71-- S. C.

7C 7A' i e-- I~. ,.apr ii line num,r c),),,.

* a ~y .... ~ ci

L' L .rc .z r L ~ &ii'i *j

1 1,. JL I I Ia.P\ I- t % L I ~ . ' I I L L .s k-) I LdL0 0I's# I LL.' ~L I -

U: L.S.C .44,i(!)(uP~crri L:L 24. F --C F orm 3

(1 k:,t usce only, ty Politic-a' innr~? eraa Cerneaa i 1pon

c~p Line ".,r ~ U' M

Namet of P'olitical C.ommgtiee in Pull

National r'exubl icarn Sena torial Commi7,t e e - :-endi turesHas your CA.ormitie tpen oeiptio to mne coorointiec exoencoures Oy a Politeml Darycrmite-e? 13 Y 0If YES, nrie heoeorsiamine omitie.: he'ub~ca- 1,at-.onal anc/o:- respective State Co~zitteeFull Name. Maiinq Aooress and ZIP Cooe Namne of Fe-cleral Cajnosocate SuDpornec. j Panicutars of Ex:>encltiurr Dait imointn* Amount

of Each Payiet State. Dustric-t & O'Iice Sought _______________ CJY. yetar) ____

Arthur J. Finkelstein ?e-Elect Thur-mond bledia 9-28-78$ 2,16& Associates Committiee Advertising

13 Third Street ScutCh CarolinaR~ye, New Yor-k 10580

Aggreouif Gene~ra; Eit-ziior Exrnicilurefo This C..vuoczie -( y _______________ ______

Full Namne &',ailing AOcless anc ZIF C.oot Namt ol Peoerk Cjruo.Cpe Supporiec. tCrlicr 01 ;-&penOlturt C'a,.t tmoir, Amnounu

of Each Payee S~ate, Districi & Office &ouph, w y. year)

I~outh Carolina Re-Elect Thurmiond Uity9-28-78 1E lectric.& Gas Co. Committee Se rvice s

..o0. Box 764 South Carolina

29218

ulIi Namne. MaiiAc Adress anti ZIP C Dle N a e ojE ?: Peea ad~leSP~tC artscuanso ci x.-roiture bitr (onTh) Amnoun-

Qhezon i. eaeRe-Elect Thurmond Accountinc 92-8 144L08 Sunset. Blvd. C o mit t.ee Services

2es Cou-miaS. C. South Carolina

ret olmba,2969 Aooreoiaie General Election EzD-endaiiureI

1'ull Namet Malinc Ad~oress Prud ZI7P C.ooe Nrn of- Feea 2iot i SD) ri e: c1 I-,-niut Dt innm Amour,

of Each Payee Slale. ,sr P Office So tcav,, yea.

South Carolina I Re-Elecz Thurmnond Ne*--SDaDer 9-28-78 42Legionaire C o -, -12''z e e d %7e~ r - ' SL

P. 0. Box 1451 South CarolinaCoiUrnL~ial S. C.

I ;,rer-21t uur. - c

ull Namit . V lnc :,0c'rs& ?ruCz Occr I.ru Cl rt C,-' c.X;St: ,rcLiftI- V '. r

v! Ea-tc F-livef .0 : CJ.

So-Lbz Ca-rol'na Staze e e- ec z ~ n xi:~c :

- II

7. 0. ~3cx 293 c~ICc.,TC:-iS.C

I IF@irF. ? V.

__M I M

C- .. .4C3

Or,4 L.EHooLF Frci:r ~.", F~ror% F Ftru'RA OF FICE

(Scrir L C' F4 UE C-r r,

(714 I-* C Uiv ily by I'o1g1.6.j onia.q lheI*' C.&q.evat I 10c-i..)

t.*iq (1 Ii~a~,ta~ C~4.r'a~attrin #- ull

S~enatorii - 1- .: -~wsyor omil" oen crsigrated to Make coor~snaleo explenclitures Dy a political paryll czmmill? Y L

I1 YES. nprnee c 'ranstnc commiree: 1 c rl 0 adc-r 7esvective St atze'JIIrntm. N..,ien; Aooreis #no ZIP C~oot

r oft Eacl pry"'eName of IFeoeral Caaicate SumofrteC.

C) fl::Co==ft tee

Particular% o1 Ex,vnoslurt Dlt IrOAl Amo uni

IGraxalinq Soecialty Re-Elect Thurmond Advertising 9-28-78Adverltisina Co. C o nmi 1t:e e Ser-vices

'-30 Cent%-re Street. South CarolinaS0. Box 461

Oagbr, 29115 Aaore-caie General Elecion E ~ndtFull Nane. Wt.liarc 4,ocj an:: ZIP Cooe 1 ivio Cjrorie C-m clteS:prr. Vaic n o enoiturt ei r~nh m u -

of Ea~ch Fevre Stale, Ditricl & Office 5ocldy er

0_ot % ision Re-Elect Thurmond Fi).r ?roduction 9-28-78 41J.17 Gl1adden Street C o rmiIte etolunbia, S. C. South Carolina

29205

'Aggreclaie General ElcinExoendeiurel

107 i1hi'S C rndcie - 0 31MtnI Name, Maiirc Aoalcoess anid ZIP Code Name of Feoeral Candicate Sux~orllec. i-rliCulars 01 1EXpenotlure Dve (month. Amount

ofic ae S-zale' Distric, b. Office Scouph? day. year)

Cr.om-ers P-Nuts Re-Elect. Thurmrond Novelties 9-28-78 121=.- 0. Box 163 C o -mi tt .e e;,olumbia, S. C. South Carolina

29202

Accreoaie General Eiecior Expenclu ure_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ___ 110 l his C.Para~c.ie - S q_ _ __ _ ___G_ _ _

11 Namne, Malloro Aoress anid ZIP Coot Name of F Coral Caiclait Su.o~orte. rcasc Aeo Date lmonin. Amnoun01 EahPevee D ~ iDstict & O1ffce sohl . ov. yeas

t"'ouvenir Prca eEetThur=mond i'Adv e -J.s 9-28-78 1C ornm tt e e C om:-tte e ISrie

S. C. SaeCollege Sout6h CallolinaD . 0. B73ox 17050rance!Durg, S. C.

291 ~ cc~c.~i en~erz, E :tzlcr :zX:rro,1lUa

ol r W-ar l in A4r'res uric Z*I Coo( 1,.P'n C1 rforri: C.Pr,c~ rie -t( 1 1 sc6i a :.aric. re :)l'1! i. n C

c ' p IeC I sievs D 1 , 0 L.1Cr ct $>Cv Cl.' %It

& -K Ccr7rc- R~ ec t Tr~~ .71-.~ C: 7TC

G e C CL- ''

A:'z'e C.crrr er :;,

C" I~i~~ J ~(.T

; C , L s * -t , I . - I C C., er. "

C L) IT U r. i 1Z I.. C. e

1).C. 0C-4L 3

0 N, EF F VF C 00, rD A T: F 0f F~ F D FTR10 FF IOCF

.. ,,;C) rir i C L 4, F- Vc r nT 2)

N~amne Of V01cI'laC.aI Cc m r t if) & Ull

Nat,-ior i Rerul ican Sen-=tor -La COr 'te~ C- -F :: .ha our Cornmilirt be otsignae to mak~e coorcinsiro expien0Ioures DOva 01Oi, r.A-Ty ommrl% e.& Z; YEt

IfYE~nmeth ceiorineormi~r:Repu!bljca Nationa2 ano /or resn-ective S:aze Co-,.A.t te eFulf YSNm~eligoes nd ZIm oe Namne of f~tocrm Canoi: iaJpportre. JParticulars of ix~rnojtUr1 Usittmcrin Ir% Amouni

of F-ach Pay"e Stitt________&_Ofice______"_.year

The St-ar Re-.ect Thurmnond Printinc 9-28-78 s 3 73106 E. Buena Vista C c, a tt:e e ServicesAvenue South CarolinaN. Aucusta,'S. C.

29841

ApprepAir General Eleciion Ea.t.'enc1ut tr______________________4o___ , this Cpmrbc~a: - S ) 'I) -. 0(

Full Name. W.'.atng A0oress aruc ZIP Cooe j Namne 01 &eoeral C..nocairl Suoporlec. FrT.Cuarh o! L'ej tr jEaeionn m~

of Each Payer State. Ditrici & Office Souophtp c.a year)

1Columbia Office Re-Elect" Thurmrond Enve2.ooe Stock 9-28-78 3 32~Supply Company C o rnu-aIt 6tee~1112 Lady Street South Carolina

PP 0. Box 327.N. u=, l S.C.

L n 029 202 Aggrewie General Ele-iuor. Expernditure

Col br thi Candicale - S / ______________

'iull Namne, Wh01ino Acefess and ZIP Cooe Namne of Peorral Canoicsie Suronec, raritculars o' Ex:perioturt Dait (montri. Ar,-ountof Each Favee State, Dis-.r~ci & Office Souohl day,_____ year)___

ZDrofessionai Cornpt:)At-er Re-Elect Thurmond Cornuter 9-28-78 3,336C't Servrice, Inc. C on= itt"-e e Services

.N2650 E. Main Street *South Carolina:)Spartanburg, S. C.

C729303 Agece General Elecion Ex:eno IiU re

To his nd't1 - Sc~1.)4L -~uINamne, Mailing Aooress an-- ZIP Cooe Name of Fcoeral C.anoicate Sux!noriec, ;oi-cule- C! :ix:-eonure ZDar Imonth. Amrnvn,

of Each Pee State, Disiric., & Office SOijV cy. ear

Covinqton-Qturzn- Re-Elect"L Thu~rmondc ?.cr-2E-78 2,631-)Dicely C ~t -e e Seri s

1703 Gervais StreetC South Ccar-olinaCol~umbia, S. C.

0 1 MI po'i - S7

& Ull Nmrn-t, W-ioflnc Acc.eit an-, Z IF loot rvm a rntc e c r -j. C.e r)cc. it S C It f;~.' z, C ':-:~r M, CrO)~, U n~,.~C' t~~ &vee & Ofr Sz, : C-1z

\Crecor\ ie

1 C. e-

Z'W~4 cliec

I-c Co.rl

I C

1C., -

T. 0T7AL C)r~7 t~ ~':~~

; ill L-t 24. 01 LC Fc,,m '-,

-7 r7h*.:r---C e e

C

Si,'.,,

~ W

~n D.C. ~C~'C3

PO. ITICA # RTY CO toll MTT F '-)r% f) r1 II 1 CF r%,) AG c()

(2 U.S. C. 4 j(d))(Su~n~L -: ;- F EC Form2)

(To bo usce vnly by Poistc-al co'-mm",t in the General E lv.iooftr)

N~ame of Poitical Comvmittee on ull

Na tional Rlepuhb2ican Se.-atcrial Cc.-r'.itee - ExendituresHasi your C.omrnitee been oesi'naxeC to make cooloinatec tXrpeno'~w'es Oy a P0olitical Perry comm:e? E YS D P4.0IfYS petei-soa'eomnr Republican Natora2 ercD Dective State CoMM~ttce

tul ame aiing Aooreu and ZIP C.coe Name of F-eora C~aioicait Supoorielt. PaIcular's of Epenoirurt Dalt Imoit. Amroun~u~lName of ach ayeeStale. Districi 1, Office I&Dv'il I _______________ . -year)

Pioneer Printing Co. Re-Elect Thurmnond Pr-i n tinc 9-28-78 $ 85(P. 0. Box 717 C on.rait,-t ee Servi.ces2008 Staze Street So uth CarolinaCayce, S. C.

29033,Accreuiae G~eneral isr:toci Z_-;enoit urCfor thit Oardicare , q1 -D

Full Name. MahnS Acoo'ess ariC ZIP Coot Name of & corral Caroicair Su::oriec:. F'airiculari c zxaconcltr r imon . AbunI' sirle Datei &, Ofimountl 11

of Each Frevee SUt.Dt~i6Offc uh y. Vear)

Action Graphics Re-Elect Thurmond : rin tin c 9-28-78 41;32 Knox P_!bott Drive Coro-ittee .Services

Wayce, S. C.. South CarolinaN 29033

A cr~ate General Election Ex>enoiture.~~uII Name, ~ Fever C~oor for This C-4ndcte- SLL Fr'urio err Dtionr Aun

7) u N me.Mvslinc Accress and ZIP Co a eo eirlCniae$::o1e. Fnclr ! ceciue DI m nr

::Zerox Corporat~ion Re-7lect- Thurrnond Ecujpvient 9-28-78 3 3S0. Box 36084 M C ommit,-tee (Co=%, Fachime)

.4ittsburgh, Pa. Sout&-h Carolina15250

for, kqarecair General Ele c For =lcersdiure

-~~~~~~~ f~~~~or This Can6eIC - }J J42 ________________________

fJi~pi Name, Maliiar Aooress anC ZIP Cocle Name of Fecorral arioizt Suo:)oriec. F0! EIDa's mcloote Dale tMOM11%. Amour...

of Each Payee Siale. Distric;. & 01f 'ce sowchl 02cy. year I

Select Business R;e-lc.Tuno O e9287 21.Eauiom~ent of S. C. Coj,,It'-ee E7u--et andp.0. Box 6136' South Carolina Su p

Colur, iaf S. C.

7c:Cc X C C e S~t

Cou.zaS. C. £ozr C a r Ci2 920

___ - M__

I)o-

L-s-il, 24,

Sup..enF E: C EF orm3)W

(To bq used only by Foticil ,-m- neev in the Ge-noral Eir-i-,t

F t, L~rie 24. 9 C (Fcorr 2

N~ame ol Politi"I Committee in Full

National T-cpublicar, Sernac:ial CL-ir4tee-7xc~iue

jsas your COmm1IT" r~n oesipn5meC to mnake ccpordirsatecs expenoitures 0 ' & P01iTical parry commitiet- M Y ES D NO

PulNmMailing Aoore= and ZIP Cooe Namne ot Feoeral Cinoscaie SvuporeC. Fariipuars of Lxpenciture Dt mnh Aon

~uI am, of Eac-h Payee Sltate, Dricl L& Of fice -Souphl Gay Oa e aonrp A o

The Robert Goodman Agency Al Simpson o Senate Media Consultant 9-27-78 1.51066S.

12 West 'Read S:reet Wyoming

zaltimore, 10 21'201

AOrecuae General Els.:rcr- Expieritiure

-ull Name, Maiisng A::Iores ano ZIP Coat Name oi Fecseral Candicaie Supported. Ijicj?- lipniue D' m rj, A on

of Each Payee State. District &. O1ice Siu~i caiJyt' 01EendtreAmi)

iarket Opinion Research Brooke Co=,.it.-tee Telephone polling 9-27-78 20,200,

&2 West Adams Messachusetts

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Agorepait General Election~ Expenditure/

iort his OCandiwie - S 2? (;- .. '::' S _____________

SName. Mailing Acoress anc ZIP Coce Nime oli &eoeral Canicale supostO. Fartculari 0I cix:)endilure D.-Ie i rn nI I-,. Arruunt

of Each Payee State. District & Office s.ouotit d2Y. Year) _______

,)'-ke Kelly

.115,80 S. Syracuse Circle C~srn Caoug toi~a e-97 e3,000tinO~ite If"l C1~te Cnutn

glewood, Colorado 80111 Colorado

. Aoorecaie General Eieion Exp.enosture

11 Name, miilng Acsore-s and ZIP Code

of Each Payee

'-ational Direct Yzil

Services, Inc.Suit-e 402233A ;iscoflsil Ave. NK.V

~asingonD. C. 20007

STMFII! DitjriCt & Of'fice Souch-,

A--r=stroMS Can-Paign"Co=it: eeColorado

tD' this Czrclc 21E~)~2~ C

,;I! NOME. tvalurt; A:OorC'. ano ZIF Coot qame C'. ~rCu~uS~~t:of Eacn- Fauyet Si sr~ 1ir

c?y'. year) I

6"9-2)9 -7 S

s e Vi-,ces

Am c. u

Denvix:', Cc, or a do 602.j7

I.

Cr~~ n

Cclored -O

-~~~~~ -7 74' c! cx4 1~lwe

~~70TALni lin norzr OnlyuC . .~O l1 . ...... ...

IN

I

A rr, c, u r -,arll-'Olir: C,'

7 CE

D.C. ~O463

F v- Line~ C* F L." P;c)rr. 2

(To ee Onif( Vy PoillicJ4 r-rrn _ in theC G6'4f*TI1 l. i

rNbme cf I-ol,,ical Cornmtite in Full

N'ationa2. Republic an S enC r I 2 C o 2tte E x __ u-i-%hs youir Cormm et t Leen OeslpftleC~ 10 mabkt COOrcrimate C LP(erOiuE1 Oy a1 P011AIi' -1 y E~ S .L) ~

F-ull Narne, M.a~iin; Aooreu. Prid ZIP C.OOe Namne of ireoral Canioale Supponec. PaflsIC0ar. of Lf.-l0Utt Dat CJCmon') Arnouint

of Exah Paye-e SIMe.sr' c & O1fgte Sou~rh day, year) ________

Tomn Horner Durenberger -for Consultinc 9-29-78 31000.Suite E164 S en at'-e Services812 0 Penn Ave.,South Mi ~esotaMi nneapolis Mn.

55431~

for This Cflcdir~v -

;-Ull Na.irt Maitn-, Aocress and dZI'P Cooe Name oi roera! CO ICn31 S L;P 0r 1e r . riua Of ;_-xel iturt -- 'l trnotr.. kimoUri

of Each Favee State. Dsrcl 6, Office Sou-,ur Uy ye* ar)

..iNorthwes-temn Bell Durenbercer for Tele-pone 90-29-78 2,371.Telephone Co. Senat-e Services

.42Soo Line Bld~g. Minnesotannearoolis,- n

* 55402

t 11 kgprecait General EIezlio Expenditure

for tis C.nd it .- S__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Nszme k hri, M.jihno Acrms arb ZIP Oce Name of recer;& Cznoi ale SV))ojC Farliclr of LXr,2r it trm, Announi

of Each Payer - ~ state, pitricm & 0Office sczuch~ czy, year)

P'aul. Overgaara Durer-berger for Consl.: 9-2-9-78 41500.Suie 64S at Services

'"612 0 Penn .Ave. South M.in ne so a_:Y.inneaO2.iS, Mn.

55431.______Ag-peaie General Elt-cor cE:xpcndiiure)

-ull Nzitre, l.ilinp Aocress anc ZIP C~oe Namne o' Feceral Caci i Sup~orleC. j or*,Irno3:, re Dzie ifnm zn.r Amount

C*1 of Each Pryee s~reu DITI* E. OUce souch, ce'. veea.

r?.arket O=-nion Durenberoer for T e I e n71,nc C-29-7 ,5 c

.Research S en at e28 We~st A6.alrs M in n e s ot;-

48226 _____________

to' Ean F-cce- yLee 7.~

S--n e r . oC)

- d a, 21f.

a~-~ :cr ~.. Cc7 S. z>7 - ' 20 CI

20r - .. ;1

I - - ~ - r

7 C L C

n I sA c I r) t r. Umir r C, F) NO :

o~ be ua.d only by Political :;r mrnwei in the General EI~i oro)

Namt C1 I'c).I1,-AI .Ommnttin~ gFl 1

___ 1~tioa1 e~bica~cenatorial Com4--tee#-a your C~rrjm toee otsigfl81e- to make CooroinateO exper.0i~ure, b>Y A POIIIIC-81 PirrY, C~mflrf~le-e? N 0bQN

~~~~~~p -aim -~o repcive S -a te C mte

Fbi Nru~ '.iIn; Aooreu and~ ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeeal Canouc-3Te Supponec, Iaougr atxpemoiiuret DAIC %Monr* ~ r

of Eah Pay"e Sid.Osre ficS~o ______________ iy* year) _______

.Monarch Pri nting Citizens fo r Percy Printing 0-29-78 $4,170.Corpora tion ilinoi s Services

C:hicago, .Illinois

60607Ac)-ret-3te General -je:- .oite

5u1Nm.Malimcr Acoress anc ZIP Cocet Name of -eotrhI C~tnocze Sv:);omri. PI tcuiars of :xer ie rtr z "E (no lmO i, A m un~*

of Eachr Payee State. Di:-rim & 0*ffice S£-ouohI c-ay. year) I_______

OlJga %7. Simpson Citizens for Percy Consulting 9-29-78 2.1006.'Suite 1,308-A Illinois Services

60 16th StjS W.&a shinc~ton, D. C.

2 0024 Apicreca1e General Ele--iorr EaXPCndiTUrC~~LarieN~i~r~ oor~sar ZI Coe for this Cancfi.aie Z/ a~c~a~c xeo~r Or m~~ mu~

-idig A cress ac: IP ~de Namne of FeoeraI Cjanoioae &joortec, Priua- lEpnitr, Dl m nl. A on

of Eikch F-ayee State. Dlsiric-t & Office $.ouohi djy, year) _______

NatioCn L:' Dir -7e Ct M4 ai1 Ci tizens for Percy Dr e c t il-2 780Services, Inc. Illinois Services

6Suit"e --.400'.2233 Wisconsin Ave.-Washington, D . C . __________rl I-cso Epncitr

20007 Agrc.i Geea1lcto .e~rior This Ca dioapiv , L _____________________

6111 Name, Wain Aooress an ZIP Coot Name of Feoeral Canccae Suoportec. Faritcuiars ci -_x:erroiTure Dale tmnzn. 0 u

ef --:,-h Peyee State. 01srici & Off'ce >owoh. .Cay. Year.

I e-850 Third Akvenue Sena-tor Cr-if.-fin detsn C

New York, New Yo-rk MiCh-* a

*n i r, , w;iflc Azore:s ?r). ZIP Oooe %zmf L". ectrz.: O-)nzc. ttSrorei ?i:Jini L-_O.~ &

c fa~ V.e V~t f c ~ti C. .'c

z-zaev:Z , .0

0~. C& 2 2

aCC) r %,.e r

t en / a :: ' C V eO~/

TAL C,~zue ~ ~~:s7AL Irrn! I D 0: (:t c 11 s Z,, num ive .C ....

aC-

m___ M_ -1

0' Line 24. o r r r.

c' ,n~ ~)~* ~ EC ~rr~ J

~Sp~n~ H~ ~, ECrorM 3)

(To Ix ui. only by Pohli"a I C rr r-,) rnpe i Gven ra l--

N'ame of FPli~ial Commaniet in~ Pull

Natioria2 Re~ubicari Senatorial Co'-ittee -

mas your Commtrt~ been onsialiec: %o mla" cooroonatec C5.tCncoIures --y a c-itical pa.y cormt-te? . YES N D2

~ tj na~ rESres C::lVE~~z Co--::eePull Name, M'ailing AdloreL and ZIP Cocle Name of .-eoeral Canoioate SQP:orieC. ranulbrs o Ei x;,-- ollrt DaCte I"OMMN Amount

of Ebch Pry"e Stale, DnTrict & Office sool' I cy. year)

-'rIace H41debrand Bell for Senate consut ==~ 9-29-78 ~100192 Twiggs Corner- Cormdttee Services?eacht'ree City, Ga. New jersey

30269

iAq,':recpte General Eie-ttor Exrperll~u 1for this Cancale - S .-

.-llI Name. fM..ilin; Acores& ant ZIP Cor Name of Pe-otral C-3noic..3te Su,:orite, ascuar ~£~~r Da~r fmrnr,. :,roun,.

cif Ezch Payee Sw~e, District, &- Office S-Duohi t Wy. year)

,A(--rket O-Dinion H=,:hrey for Senate Poll Services 9-29-78 200,Research New l:amnshireRWest 'damsetroi t, Michizan

V.) jS2 Agorelpaie General Election Expendltureior this Canidate - S /SZ2c

-* ?.arTit. t.ailin; AboreT% an.- ZIP Code Name of Peoera; Canoiate Suppor-ted. Fift.c.lar- olt Ez.encoure Date 4monMt, A~n

of Ebch Payee Stale, DIsTrict & O1ffc SC $ucht c.)., year~

ISbh)ot1, Va 1to n & Shseen for Senate '1-3%? rtisi-nc C 9-29-78] 2,18400.scae NCrak Ser-vices

?Xecutive Building.V5524 Dou~glas Stre etI; caha, Nebraska

68102 Agofepaie General iiect,.,x:>efldtureior th' ~rcr

-ull Nlame. WMa'rn Adore-ss and ZIP Cooe Namne of Feoeral C--nccAte Sup:)orieZ Pritcu~r'. o! ::X,trMol"ure Dzie 1monr.r

of Each Payet State, Disiric-, & Office Siouohl cay. year)

;.oorecprit Gerirrz, c)eIc

~ N~m, I..;nrc AorLeSj anc ZIP 'OE Nam -toeer;,: ~r~cci, Eavi. Fave( Sa. sr 0:$Z-;:~

4rt Am

Z.~y. yCei

- 3 TDAL (1" Ze ~ c fir, nvlre)f Onl

; r7, , ;

VI

C. ,'

%.a r- %

(Sup prir: L17,.' -24 r CC Fo17r )

Co t~t us*.# d on Iy b y Pci~.. v; 11; Z On V-ht C..nral i.el,.so-?)

;;r Lae>~.F~Z Pc,,rr~ 2

i Name of Folitical Commiti"- in F ull

a 4jon22 Republican Senazcr--Z2 Cte-E n,7ue

-I.I& you,- c.Omtret tn oespnaleO to make cooroinaleC expenoi:wres :)y & poolit.i= 6prry M~rnmilre-e I£ YES!f YES, nare the ocna-t eeomin"e: Reui;Ca Na oa ancd / or 7 e spe c: Ve S ta?-te Cc-mitteeFull Name, Maiing AoOreji and ZIP Cooe Name of Feaeral Canoicaie -&1ort. j ar.cuars of Exp.'enolluft Dalt imonitr* Amnownr.

of Ea&ch Paye-t Stale. ri 6Office SOUCMI __________________ y. year) _______

A-merican Express Coi~any CitiLzens -for Percy HiScellameous-112. 1 . State St. Illinois Chbarges 9-22-78 $ 724.Chicago, Illinois 60606

Ago9fr.ate General Elvcr. -Ex-eno': urel

Full Name, Mailin.- Aocress and~ Z JP Cooe Narme of Peoe; Cznooc-e SupporieC, Z xec~e~ z-,e rnon-.n. Aon

of Epcni Fayer $-,Bit. D ic. & Office souolhl U___._1vcar)

'Avis Rent A Car- Citiz-ens -for Percy Car Rentali 9-22-78 763..-10 N~. Dearborn St. 'Illinoi Sun.c ago, Illinois 60601

TpApprepiar General EILe--ton Ex:>end turefor this cindra-e C)4 -A( 7' / ___________________

1411 #,a t Malln; AoorL-.. anc ZIP C~oot Namne of Feoerji Cancicaje Supporteo. -riuz- r, Expeno0 re j ai irnonvr, Ano uni

of Ezc.n Fpavee State, Dsrizz Es Office Soucht UNI. year) _______

-fo-iley Deardourif & Assocsuit e 5~10Citiz-ens or Percy F-6i Av ertisi 9-22-78 .7,500.C,

l3 5th St., N~. W. llinois-3 a shinsgton, D.C. 20005

Aooreoaie General Elecloon Ex ceityre

ior this C.4ndioa-.e - S 7 _____________ ______

11I Name, Malino AOorec.S ano ZIP C.ooe Name o1 Feoeral C.anoicMe Su~orie:. c rIiJ-. c xo-ncizure Dair lmonvi Amon

of Each Payee S-tte, Dtrinc- &. Off~ce Scowchtcy year)

Budgt Quck PintCitiz-ens -'or Percy Brnigserv-ces 9-2-78 ~ c507 W. Jac-kson Blvd. IlniC-hica-go, ilioi 0606

itzr IniS Carcc t- L / 1j ' 1

WI ~m~ I.airz Acre~ an: ZIP I.oe r ct e ~ ~ S~rc IL~ ~~;c~r rc.roih : ~veSac .~r ~ ...- year)

C,::zzn on

:c~r:lli~is

A;~rCZ.2'.r Gc'e~ zr :z:-*z ,~.jr'~ ,.1

fc~' r~I. C~''C'Z' - '/.:.'',

-7 A c7 A~~- L C.z ~c-- *rw(V. T, itn? nL;rn t,?! ',

£-22-7E .LC

(2 U..CLin 2~ FC Fon 3)

(To be used only by Folit)Ic, -.ormrri-e- in~ vi Gt~q-%r& E.'rclon)

t' L'c ~~FEC ~-'rr 2

,.mt 01 i-olItic4 Cocmmittee in Full

N\ational FRe~ublican Senatcrin2 C~e~~~tr~_Ls your C.0mmiTet bieen oesipmaied To mau coordinair~0 czpencOtures try a p01iMACI Pary =~maire? X YED NO0

:IYES,name 1he oeilnaflne omri~e: n-'111.0 ; Frspct S t ate -C o~it-wjI Name, tu'J~

1'fl A~orc1 and ZIP C-00e

Stale 0iitric & Office Sovec"It Cay. vear)

:.a~ber t F-rel1d Airport Citizens for Percy Charter service 9-22-78 452.36

2. o. Box 10014 *IllinoisSz. Louis, Missouri 63 145

Aggrep.ate General Eic ri Ezpenoiu

i C ori hs _? n 6_M t - S -

r-ull Nbme. ta , oore~s and ZIP Cooe Name of Feoeral Caicaje Supp~oriet. Fet~icula 01 Ex~eriTivr Ciair irrotvt. o: . x,

Of Erch Payee I State, Disiric- & Office Souol I _____________ _ c-ay, 'Veer)

T7he Racqiuet Club of I

3hicag Citizens for Percy Reception 9-22-78 776 .2C.

L65 N. Dearborn Pk-.y. Ilin

c,&cago, -1llinois 60610Agcregale General Ele--acm Ex.vndIaure

%0 or This Cafldhc~ - 4 / 7 . / ______________

IName. r.,.aiing Aocrm3 and ZIP COD Name of Fed~eral Canoicalt S-Poid -riua- fEceoj e Lacto .. A

01, Ezch Payee $late. DIS~ricm & Office Souoh* yea.)0ue acimnn ~~r

1,m704 Citiz4_ens for Percy OffEice supplies 92-8 46 4

~S. Wabash .Illinois

*A1.caoIllinois 60603

rAggrepait General Elemclo EXCIPP-oTU a

ore!hu C nd a t - S q_ J 1 . 1_/L/Name~~"al 01nnv a-oernLnowal uuunc

;ull Name. Mallino Aooress andb ZIP C-oer*141%0 o!Epch Paye-e State, Dis-,ric- & O1fice Scucn I

- -704p C4iiens for Percy36 S. Wabash Illinois

~n~c~a 7, illnoi-s 60607 ______________Acreaf ;rcaIgou. :,~n~.r

iav year)

:igse-i e s -22- 7 8 1

Nl a~e .,iwinc A~Cre~s ano~l ZIP C0oe 1 2aFr'ef

r)'O A e~~z nr u mW : o r ,

r .n2 S

t C ,rer~i :1 uC C'.CLJ'

,alt.~~' -~j 01 /f!: SO V-(

is Cr C -D E:77E

0.0. 2~4~3

I

L, ,c 7- j E C F - Frr, 2

I var ,:,jiars of Expoendiiure,krnuont

C 11- . -

*Uppjl'q 16. F EC F 0rr m).C T C~c

P'~r Lir,' i'. FEC Fcm~ 3

ci so o wmad.c oniy by F-rhi*c~A Con inme, o. ins C.,n.rai E nivvM

Nare f l-D~iiCommiet in Full

N~ational. Republican SeruL:or.-al Cc~ittee - Zxperldit--res

meta your Cxcrnmiire been ociiqnaie-; to make Cooroinallec eXpenctiurel Dy a p.oliliCJ! rnr -,l~ete? YE DNO

IfYFnie1eomiivn onmne Re pub i rn 1ir_4on P1 a nc ic 0 respective State Co==itzee

Full Name. Mailing Aoo'en n ZIP Coce Nm iFoea o~e Surne. F-rticwuars oi Exenoiiurt D.ate ilmcnn

of Each Payeet Slraij. Di-;trIVt & O1fici -Sou9ch WAY. t _______

Roa' Rbet Consulting Seapt.3 205 Blome Road Sen. Griffin,

Cincinnati, Oi 45 24 1i:gn ~ ~ ne 77 79S 8U.S. Senate

Apgrrc.at General Eleciti ExpCnitUrt

I fr Ti,~ C.Anida~ir - S 2 ~ __________________________

Pull Name, M.%iin Aocriess &nc ZIP Coot Namne oi Peor;'i! Cair ale SCup'orc. ol _-rc~~ xioenciure i i t im on; ). OL ~ r-, 0U r1

oL Each Payee Siale. Disirict 1. Ofi ce sougnt C~zY. year

1205 Blomne Road Sen. Percy, ILL,'

.:'nc inna t i Ohio 45243 'U.S. Senate Consulting Sep:.:41vExpenses '28q 5

[Appretle General Eiecia nz ,Enoriutefor thi .andioaie - Ll/U(

i" I Name. W.alin Adnre s andc ZIP Coot NbmCe of Peoeral Carciiioae Suipcorted. I Farli.ulant oi Expenditurt DaleC tmo-nm* AMCLn

ofci ~.h Parye- Strie, Dlirlc, & Otfice Souch, idly. year

-!Onald Roberts Sen. Tower ,Tex:as Consulting Sept.

C,05 Blome Road~ U.S. Senare E-Xpenses '78 $ 13r.

,-jncinnati. Ohio 4524 3

Agorenair General Electrjon Ex:enditu'eI

lor thil C.Prdi ate - S I:

.- i~wl Name. M ian re-ss and ZIP Cooe Name of Feceral Candcwit Supz0rtea. t rartrCiwar$ oi Ex >noiurc CDZ.r trnontr, Ar) W

of Eaich Payiee S-.alf, DISric. Office Scuort 'I

4,crrr-zie Gener~i :. Dn ~rO~

WI N~e i.~r; Aocre.Ls anc ZIP cc)t m ~rOrL ~:c~:, ~: C u ;

C) ar e ~as Dr~&O i ~ :.'y?

In'rs ::rlv:: ~ e *ni i n m e orl), v

*t Ljrbt 2d. FLC Fcr-rn 2

Tolecon:

Dug Creevy with Rodnrey SmithNational Republican Senaitorial. Comi nt tee -Expendi tures2/28/79

PFAI's wovre sent to the conrittee for the MiC'1 and 10G reports. Response vasreceived 2/22/79(By th~e Clurk of the Senate) to these requests. A\s I had sorquestions regarding the response, I phoned Smidth for clarification.

October 20 Nbnthly

/ ~Paragraph 1--No problems~

S Paragraph 2--Schedule B provided was for the 100 report, not for the 1110.Smth stated this was an oversight, and thlat it would be corrected.

7Parag-raph 3--1 infoimd Smith that, with tx,,.u exceptions, each of the entriesnoted in the RFAT were reported as in-kind contributions on Line 22(c)on the original report, and that they were reported as coordina-tedexpenditures in the response fFiled.

The exceptions: 1. Dulrenberger support ($2,090.05) had not appearedin the orig~inal report mder either Line 22(c)

0 or Line 24.

2. Durenberger support ($3,929.80) appeared in theoriginal report as an in-kind contribution toCochran, and not Durenberger.

Smrith stated that he had been unclear \?niere he should report",,1 a d ) expenditures, ;..'hen the F-7nolowlt ofF support was a portion~of an expenditure made and reported on Line 20. le said thatthe entries on Line 20, in the orig-inal report, were the sameentries wh-ich were nuLde on Line 22(c), in tChe original report.

C- 'Ile did state however, th-at entries were rrmde on Line 22(c) w,,hichC1*% should have been reported on Line 24, i.e. the corrittee reported

as ini-k-ind contributions sever-il expenditures which were actuallycoordinated. I informed him that in those instances in which.

N the connittee needed to report expenditures as 441 a(d) and theexpenditures were reported unider Line 20, the connittee should reportthe expenditure§ as rrar7o entries on Schedule F. By so doing, thecash sunary figures would not be inflated.

Regarding the exceptions, Smlith stated that the S2 ,090 was a 441a(d)expenditure on beh-alf of Direnberge r, and that the $8929 was a 4 1{la(1)expen diture on beh-alf of CoChran. ArmnLdn)nats {*%Uuicd be slhiflitteI ellthese.

10 Day Pre-Cencral

/ /.2 -Qnly problem was with Parag~raph 4

&Paragraph 4--Thie coiadittee had in the original report reported. these entries on22(c), and in the response, reported them0-1 on Line 24, referringto the expenditures variously as, "In-kindi contribur-ions," ''In-'lindExpqenditures, " and 'Allocated Expenditures. "1?

TeleconPage Twon

I once again informed Smith that Line 22 (c) is to be used forthe reporting of in-kind contributions arnd that Line 24 is tobe used for the reporting of coordinated expenditures.

It is apparent then that the conmittee has reported on Line 22(c) expenditureswhich should have been reported on Line 24. Smith stated that he would gothrough each of his reports, and reanalyze all entries nmde on Line 22(c). Hewill submit amendme~nts as necessary.

I stated that I believed the trouble began with the Septanber 20 Ibnthly. Thereis an PFAI still outstanding on this report, and that RFAI concerns problemswith Line 22(c).

Finally, Smith stated that after the election they had auditors go throughthe corrittee's records and reports to assure that there was full disclosureand that no limitations had been exceeded. Ile stated that the auditors' reportindicated that there had been full disclosure and that no limitations hadbeen exceeded.

,6non. D.Z. 2CA40G

I lasrtsfert Ow~ C - ntribUt~uIls Irl Kimci

~ , L.a ke'payrnens iid helunds sace)

SWu,;)uri~nu Lirvs 203, 'A riFd 22a, 2.U. v d 22Cc 1 F EC F C N" 3

tir le~~,!d'hr ot

ea1ch nm~e ~~

Name of Canceat. or Committee in Full


Full Name, Mailing Ades and ZIP Code Particulars of Expenditure VDate (month, Amiount of each expend.-

martin For U. S.- Senate Sec. 441. Contribution dyya)trtipro

P. 0. Box 3406 _______ _______ 10-6-78 1$17,000.00Birmingham, Alabama 35205 ExpenCiture lot:

C)_Frimp~v _General 0 Olher ________________________

Full N~ame. Mailin; Aaarnss and ZIP Code Parisculars, of Expenditure Date lmonh. Amount of each expeno,

ay, year) lure this period

Expenditure Ior:

[) Ptimary C General 0Other4Full Name. Mailing ors and ZIP Code Particulars of Expendiwtur Dale imonth, ronoieahtpdi

G ay. year) lure this period

0 [Experioiture for:C Prir 5 General COther _________ _______

9 ull Name. Marlin; Acioress and ZIP Code Pariiculars of Expenditure Date (rmonth. Amount of each .~

ay year) lure this periodI

Expenditure for:

0 Primary 0 General COther _____________

Full Name, Mailing Aooress and ZIP Cooe Particulars of Expenditure Date (mnonth, Amount of each ex:>tno*.

cay, year) ture this perice

.4,.

Expenoiiure for.

0 Primary 0 General 0C 0then er ue hspr

'Jull Name, Mailing Address and ZIP Cooe Farticulars of Expenditure I atre (month, Amount of each expeno..

;Expenooiure for:

'0 Pr nr y [D General [Ot),her

Full Name. Mailin; Address and ZIP Cooe Particuaors of Expenditure Dale imontr.. Am'ount cf each ex:pend,.

cay. year) tute this Deriod"

r Prm ?rv L- Grreral 5 -her

; Uli Namne WI,ilino Aoorcss anc Z1F, Coce Pariscolar. ol Exc~encoturE Dale trnonir, :-Mounl C! each ejopero..cay. year) lure 1j'is perloc

5 F'mr~ S ) r'ntra SOne

SUCOT AL c' :Acprnci-,ures ihis zaof' .c:.i .. . . . . r7,00 0.00

r07/%L tri! Cperiod, tlzs, rapr tnt, line rwmpe! r) . ... .... ..... . . . . . 0 ) 0 . 0

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 I iR1I I N.W.WASHIN(;IOND.C 20463

MEMORANDUM TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CHARLES STEELE

MARJORIE W. EMMONS

FEBRUARY 6, 1979

MUR 820 - Interim Investigative Reportdated 1-31-79? Signed by GC 2-2-79;Received in OCS Friday, 2-2-79, 5:06

The above-named document was circulated to

the Commission on a 24-hour no-objection basis

at 12:00, Monday, February 5, 1979.

There were no objections to the Interim Investigative

Report.

February 2,, 1979

MElMORANDUM TO: Marge Enmons


SUBJECT: MUR 820

Please have the attached Interim Invest Report on

MUR 820 distributed to the Commission.

Thank you.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION .kJanuary 31, 1979

7FEB P 5: 06

In the Matter of)

National Republican ) MUR 820Senatorial Committee)

INTERIM INVESTIGATIVE REPORT

On January 10, 1979, the National Republican Senatorial

Committee submitted their reply to our reason to believe

notification letter. We are currently reviewing the response

o and analyzing the facts in this matter. We have also requested

the Reports Analysis Division to review certain reports involved

in this matter to assist in our investigation. A full report1'7

will follow.

do

91_ __ _ _

General Counsel/ Date

46*January 31, 1979

MEMORANDUM

TO: Tomn Haselhorst

THROUGH: Orlando B. Potter~

FROM: William C. Oldakyfr)

FROM:Kath" 4 61kins

SUBJECT: Reports Analysis Review of the Jim Martin for

Senate Committee Sl and S

The Office of the General Counsel is currently conducting

an investigation which involves the Jim martin for Senate

Committee 81 and S.We request the Reports Analysis Division

to do an expedited analysis of their reports to assist in the

Commission's handling of this matter. We aretparticularly

concerned with the transfers of funds between the two committees

which took place on or around the 2 of October, 1978.

V,If you have any questions, please contact Kathy Perkins at

34060 or Judy Thedford at 34057.

LAW OFFICES

JENKINS, NYSTROM & STERLACCI, P.C.MERLE 11.1 JENKINS 2033 M STREET, N.W. OONEDENNIS H. NYSTROM JOHN S. CONLANMICHAEL A. STERLACCI WASHINGTON. D. C, 20036 EDWARD A. RYDERCARL V. GCHIERJOSEPH 1, JANNETTA (202) 293-2505MIHGNOFC.JAMES V~ SCH0ENERMIHANOlCSTEPHEN J. HITCHCOCK t j559gWEST% TWELVE M14L ROAD

CHRIS M. PARFITT SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 40076

GARY J. NYSTROMJaur10199(3)5-22RONALD A. DENEWETHJaur10199(3)5.26TIMOTHY J. MULLING

Kathleen Imig Perkins, Esq.Office of General CounselFederal Election Comission1325 K Street, N.W. '-

Washington, D.C. 20463

Re: M UR 820

Dear Ms. Perkins:

Enclosed you will find the affidavit of Mr. Rodney A. Smith, treasurerC of the National Republican Senatorial Committee concerning expenditures and

contributions to the two Martin for Senate Committees. As is apparent fromthe last part of the affidavit, Mr. Martin resigned from his candidacy for

rM the Senate seat of retiring Senator John Sparkman (Class 2, United StatesSenate) in October 1978, and was thereafter nominated to run for the seat

'V" left vacant by the untimely death of Senator James Allen of Alabama (Class 3,United States Senate). A similar situation had previously occurred inMinnesota and Advisory Opinion 1978-19 to Congressman Fraser was studiouslyfollowed to give direction for such a change in candidacy.

The affidavit should show our compliance with the requirements of thatAdvisory Opinion and T attach hereto copies of assignment and allocation

C' agreements of the National and State Party committees authorizing our actingas their agent in each of these campaign committees.

T will be glad to furnish any further information or documentationneeded to indicate our compliance in this matter, and ask that before anyfurther action is taken that we be given an opportunity for a conference oranswer further questions in writing.

Respectfully, f

James F. Schoener

JFS:cel

Enclosures

P.S. T also enclose a copy of the review by Stan Huckaby, the C.P.A. whochecked the items mentioned in the Rodney Smith affidavit.

Republican....NationalCommiteeBill BrookChairman


Dear Bob:


o of making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC 5441a(d)(3). YourCommittee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof general election campaign of Senate Seat #2.

%0Under 5441a(d) (3) you may spend, on the Republican National

f1 Committee's behalf, up to $60,000 for Mr. James Martin, ofAlabama


0 Very/7rl yours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacguie NystromJay BanningKenny Klinge


....,...Republican

CommitteeSeptember 5, 1978


Dear Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizes- the National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as the

agent of the Republican National Committee, for the purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a (d) (3). Your%0 Committee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalf

of the Republican National Committee, in connection with thegeneral election campaign of James Martin of Alabama.

Ln Under S441a (d) (3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCommittee's behalf, up to $10,000 for Mr. Martin.

o Best personal regards.

Very truly yours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bqb MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacguie NystromMatt WirgauJay Banning

Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican Center: 310 First Street Southeast, Washington. D.C. 20003. (2248-650

.,Republican~ational

William 0. Harris, state ChairmanMember for AlabamaP.O. Box 3315 ibm 50

AtGREEMENT BETWEENTHE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE






with the general election campaign of the candidate for the office United

States Senator for the State of Alabama.

2. Such amount of allowed expenditures under said provision has been computed

tentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amount of $62,507.00.

3. That State wishes to designate Senatorial its agent for the purpose of making

such expenditures up to the amount of $60,000.00.

40 State agrees to file an allocation statement concerning the amount not assigned

__ * to Senatorial as required by the Federal Election Commission Regulation 110.7(c).

5. ~*state agrees to carry out the provisions of such allocation statement and will


reach 80% of the amount retained by State'and a review of this agreement willC occur at such time.

6. Senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf of candidate, or if it is



This agreement signed the date opposite the respective parties' name to be effective

when signed by both parties.


Dated ~ 2I) 1978 at ByWashngo DitC.

Albmae.publican Exe tive Committee

/d5' 1978 at AlbY

Btirmingham, Alabama. William D. Harris

Title Chairman

CommitteeBill Brock

Chairman


Dear. Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizes.the National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for the purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3). Your

- Committee is authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee, in connection with the

%0 general election campaign of Senate Seat #2.and is in addition to our letter irn the amount of $60,000.

Under 5441a(d)C(3) you may spend, on the Republican NationalCommittee's behalf, an additional $1,000 for Mr.

0 Allen, bringing the cumulative total to $61,000.

-Best personal regards.

C Ver~ truly yours,

BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacquie NystromJay BanningKenny Klinge


NationalCommitteeWilliam 0. Harris, State ChairmanMember for AlabamaP.O. Box 3316Birmingharn, Alabama 35205(205) 322-5733

AGREEMENT BETWEENTHE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE






with the special general election campaign of the can'iidate for the office United

States Senator for the State of Alabama unexpired term Place #2.

2. Such amount of allowed expenditures under said provision has been computed

tentatively by the Federal Election Commission as the amount of $62,507.00.

3. That State wishes to designate Senatorial its agent for the purpose of making

such expenditures up to the amount of $62,000.00

4. State agrees to file an allocation statement concerning the amount not assigned

to Senatorial as required by the Federal Election Commission Regulation 110. 7(c) .

0 5. State agrees to carry out the provisions of such allocation statement and will


reach 80% of the amount retained by State and a review of this agreement-will

CD occur at such time.

6. senatorial agrees to make such expenditures in behalf of candidate, or if itsis.



This agreement signed the date opposite thewhen signed by both parties.

DatedWashington, D. C.

DatedBirmingham, Alabama

1978 at

1978 at

respective parties' name to be effective

Alabamna Republican Executive/Committee

B y IJ~0ATitle Chairman

E!9L

NationalCommitteeBill BrookChairman


Dear'Bob:

By this letter the Republican National Committee authorizesthe National Republican Senatorial Committee to serve as theagent of the Republican National Committee, for the purposeof making expenditures pursuant to 2 USC S441a(d) (3). YourCommittee is-authorized to make these expenditures, on behalfof the Republican National Committee, in connection with the

NO. general election campaign of Senate Seat 1, Alabamaand is in addition to our letter of Sept. 5,, 1978,, in the

X.1.1 amount of $10,000.

Under S44la(d) (3) you may spend, on the. Republican'NationalCommittee's behalf, an additional $52,000 .for M4r.Martin, bringing the cumulative total to $62,000.

C')-Best personal regards.

C" Very truly yours,

- BILL BROCK

BB/bnp

cc: Bob MooreBen CottenCharlie BlackJacquie NystromJay Banning


(202) 3f4-2206

rRw: (202/ 1.14-4679

October 17, 1978

Rod SmithNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, NEWashington, DC 20002

* Dear Rod,


following figures to the National Republican Senatorial Committee con-

cerning your limitations on the Jim Martin For Senate Committee.

"pp As you know, Mr. Martin has changed candidacy for election to the

-- United States Sentate, and, therefore, under the law, is entering a new


C-1 an allocation of the "coordinated expenditures" made by the National

Republican Senatorial Committee between the first senate race and the

second senate race. Of the $100,000.00 in coordinated expenditures that

you have made, $70,170.55 has been allocated to the first senate campaign,

and $28,458.63 has been allocated to the second campaign. The remaining

balance of $1,370.82 is presently being refunded to you by the vendor.

Using A.0. 1978-19, all of your contributions (1,0.0maximum) made

to the first sienate campaign are non-allocable to the second campaign.

Therefore, that limit will begin again. I understand that you have made

subsequent contributions to the second senate campaign, and those amounts


maining f or coordinated expenditures in the second senate campaign. A

detailed explanation for this allocation has been telecopied to you

by the Jim Martin for Senate Campaign Committee.




on your limitation.



Sincerely,

Stan Euckaby

SH: tmb



In the matter ofNATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE M.U.R. 820

AFFIDAVIT

City of Washington



I

That he is the duly appointed treasurer of the National

Republican Senatorial Committee of 227 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.,

Washington, D.C.

II


contributions as allowed by law to Republican candidates for the office


III

That in such capacity donations of cash (or in-kind) were made to


1978 in the amount of $14F,493.27 as is shown in our internal records,

a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A.

That in such capacity donations of cash in the amount of $17,000


an in-kind contribution of use of video equipment of $300.00 made on/about

October 26th as is shown by our internal records, a copy of which is

attached as Exhibit B.

V


allowed under the provisions of 2 U.S.C. Section 441a(h).

VI


of funds in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat), as

authorized by 2 U.S.C. 441a(d) and as assigned to the National

Republican Senatorial Committee by Republican National Committee.

Said expenditures in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat)

are shown in the attached Exhibit C.

C) VII


of funds in behalf of James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) as authorized


Committee by the Republican National Committee. Said expenditures in

behalf of James Martin for Senate (Allen seat) are shown in the attached

Exhibit D. As shown in said Exhibits C and D, a credit for funds or

materials transferred from James Martin for Senate (Sparkman seat) to


made on October 2, 1978.

VIII




IX

That he supervised and directed the expenditures for James Martin



Republican Executive Committee, such expenditures being shown on the

aforesaid Exhibits C and D.

x

That he is informed and believes that all such transactions

were made properly and in accordance with Commission Advisory opinion

1978-19 "Contributions to Two Campaigns by One Candidate" made in


Martin Campaigns are indistinguishable in all material aspects from


XI

That in order to make sure that all proper credits were made

for cash or credits transferred from the Martin Committee (Sparkman

seat) to the Martin Committee (Allen seat), the National Republican

Senatorial Committee required a certified public accountant to make


transferred from the first committee to the second.

XII


Treas S Natinal Republican

Senatorial Committee

Sworn to and subscribed before me a notary public in and for theDistrict of Columbia this day of January 1979.

X-'JUL

Notary ,)VublicMy comm~ission expires 34~ ~

7V

1 4

AC.4

IL 7VI '36fL .Il ~ f L _ _ *

10

I V1j I'l I -- --- 4-K-~4----~.~ Z4~J~LJL

'I I

I I

I I

I FI -

I I

'I:lf,[If : IJ......L

* I

-. I

I.

M."11 177H____

24 II F_ _ -I_ _

27 I

29 I' fj I_ _ _ _ _ _ _

30 '31 ' ~ I __________

34

35 II~~~~~~~~~~I I _____________________

39 ____

40

lIt -

,*4' I' J. I J

I , , +Ii

T 4.

12

13

145

16

",17

1

211

q 23

25

26

*27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

35

39

1 'j I I U

. I

11I- 1, 1;1111 I4 -4 1 1 1 1 1 7 ; I -

RA

i 11

I I

A~F ___

-I2 3 45 6

__ _ _ _ IC AI C- LL-gI Ir-cru Ll 1 6-!-'

T ill 3

.11lb_ d4zz!_ ::r 6______ T iT- 7

ITI

IS IL .

17.________________ ~. T~I~{~ --~+ i~s

/' -9

____ ____ ___ ____ ___ ___124

25

---------~----- __126

tII ___1127

I t r 30:

______ -~31

.-.. 3

______ _____________________________ I _______________ ______________________________ _!133_

.... _ __ __ _ I.. __ __.. ........... _ _ _ _

.. 3

_____________________________ I ________ __________ - .... 2...40

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1.. -=4I ! I ;

C A _

12 3 4 56

__________ ~ S~T~A/ qU, e4l

L11&Th~ PfrIAaxo1L ck2

490 _ I ~ I

4 L 2

6 - 5 6

2(9 ;j fii dF4 - 17 _ _

10 _ _ _ _ I Y7 10

13 { fl v- j-4II 12

14 _

1

16- - -- F

is

'I1

19I 19

________ II ~ K 2

1141 H.t 23

24C 2~*-I 4

25N T_ ________

_____________________125

26. _ _

_ _b_ ...

27

1 1444 1 7 28

30 -

129___

_ _ I _ _H _ _ _I3

31

'!_

_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ IF- , * 30

33

A2__

__ _ _

_ _ _ _

35_______ 3

39

:3__

_ _ __ _I

I __

II 40

'I'

I ,1 1 1 1 1 I I I i1 1 1

iii 2,I

22

-~' i 44 ~E#f 4 AAIh L

12

I I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ II t ' _ _ _ r **~ * *** ~ 2 5

16 F ~ r t ~ _ 26

______27________ I t I1__27_I I i ~ t I _ _

ii.".

31 131_ _ _

ii IIij j....

I _ __5__ _ _

____ I

47-r7,

.. ... ... .. ... ... ... .

jQ/- An h A.",a -

(1*-r

'44

4-U 4

4J 40t~

c,2a

I, ~C

MERLE R. JENKINSDENNIS H. NYSTROMMICHAEL A. STERLACCICARL F. SCHIERJOSEPH E. JANNETTAJAMES F. SCHOENERSTEPHEN J. HITCHCOCKCHRIS M. PARFITTGARY J. NYSTROMRONALD A. DENEWETHTIMOTHY J. MULLINS

LAW OFFICES

JENKINS, NYSTROM & STERLACCI,2032 M STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20036

(202) 203.2505

January 9, 1979

P.C.OF COUNSEL

JOHN 8. CONLANEDWARD A, RYDER

~4 IHJHUr0ICJU15999 WEST TWELVE MILE ROADSOUTHFIELD. MICHIGAN 48076

(313) 559.2828

Charles N. Steele, Esq.A ssociate General CounselFederal Election Commission1725 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20463

Re: M U R820

Dear Mr. Steele:

Please enter our appearance in behalf of the National

Republican Senatorial Committee in the above entitled

matter.

Sincerely yours,

(for the firm)

cc: James Howard Stewart, Jr.3701 Knoliwood DriveAnniston, Alabama 36201

0 A

LAW OFFICES

JENKINS, NYSTROM & STERLACCI. P.C.2033 M STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20036/

Charles N. Steele,,Esq. rAssociate General 'CounselFederal Election Commission1725 K Street, N.W.

C, Washington, D.C. 20463

S

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSIONB25 K S IREIEI N.W.WASHING IOND.C. 20463

MEMORANDUM TO

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CHARLES STEELE

MARJORIE W. EMMONS g-A f4_a1

JANUARY 9, 1979

MUR 820 (78) - Interim InvestigatoryReport dated 1-3-79; Signed 1-4-79;Received in OCS 1-5-79, 1:25


hour no-objection basis at 12:00, January 8, 1979.

The Commission Secretary's Office has received

no objections to the Interim Investigatory Report as of

1:00, this date.

011 0- N

January 5, 1979

MEMIORANDUB TO: Marge Emmu~ons

P'ROM: JPissa T. Garr

SUBJE.CT: !IUR 820

Please have the attached Interim Investigation

Reppct on MUR 820 distributed to the Commission on a

24 hour no-objection basis.

Thank you.

I N__ M_ 0

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION comsf 1: p 25January 3, 1979 PP 'L

In the Matter of)

National Republican Senatorial )MUR 820 (78)Committee)

INTERIM INVESTIGATORY REPORT

On December 13, 1978, the Commission found reason to


("NRSC") may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) in connection

with the Senatorial campaign of James Martin of Alabama,

and voted to have the letter to the respondent revised and

circulated to the Commission.

On December 22, 1978, the revised letter to NRSC was

approved by the Commission. The letter was mailed to the

respondent on January 3, 1979.

Date W ~iam CC'1 O(akerGeneral Counsel

Sc1ON C

~\ FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SIREET N.WWASHINGION,D.C. 20463

January 4, 1979


Rodney A. Smith, TreasurerNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.Washington, D.C. 20002

RE: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Smith:

I, The Federal Election Commission has received a complaintwhich alleges that the National Republican Senatorial Committee(NRSC) committed certain violations of the Federal ElectionCampaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of thecomplaint is attached. We have numbered this matter MUR 820.The Commission has reason to believe that the matters allegedin the complaint state a violation of 2 U.S.C. §441a(d).Specifically, it appears that:

1) NRSC reports filed with the Commission on October 10,1978 (October Monthly Report) and on October 28, 1978(10-Day Pre-Election Report) recite a total of $211,700.in "§441a(d) expenditures" on behalf of James Martin,Republican Candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama.

"A This figure does not include expenditures made by theNRSC on behalf of candidate Martin after October 23,1978.

2) The Commission's published calculations for partyspending limits for Congressional contests ("§441a(d)limitations) limit the national and state committeesof the Republican Party to spending a maximum of$62,506.94 each on behalf of the Republic candidatefor Senate in the state of Alabama.

3) If the National Republican Senatorial Committee actedas the authorized agent of both the National Republican

* .....- Committee and the Alabama Republican Party, its total

* spending limit on behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatorialcampaign was $125,013.38 -- approximately $86,687. lessthan already reported by the NRSC.

1 -2-

The above facts support the Commission's finding of reasonto believe that NRSC may have violated 2 U.s.c. S44la(d) bymaking expenditures in connection with the Senatorial campaignof James Martin of Alabama in excess of that provision of theAct.

Under the Act, you have an opportunity to demonstrate thatno action should be taken against you. Please submit any factualor legal materials which you believe are relevant to the Commission'sanalysis of this matter. In addition, please submit the following:

1) Written agreements authorizing the NRSC to act as theagent for both the Republican National Committee andN. the Alabama Republican Party in the expenditure "S44la(d)"

4 funds in Alabama.

2) An itemized listing of all "S44la(d) expenditures"made by the NRSC in connection with James Martin'sSenatorial campaign in Alabama made by the NRSC.:1 Where appropriate, statements should be submitted under

The Commission is under a duty to investigate this matterexpeditiously. Therefore, your response should be submitted

2 within ten days after your receipt of this notification.

If you have any questions, please contact Kathleen ImigPerkins, the attorney assigned to this matter, at 202/523-4060.

This matter will remain confidential in accordance with2 U.S.C. §437g(a) (3) (B) unless you notify the Commission inwriting that you wish the investigation to be made public.

If you intend to be represented by counsel in this matter,please have such counsel so notify us in writing.

Sincerely,

William C. Oldaker

Associate General Counsel

S SENDER Complete items 1, 2, and 3.Add your address in the "RETURN TO" spac On

reverse.

1. T he following service is requested (check one).owto whom and date delivered ......- 4

Xj t ow to whom, date, and address of delivery .

[0 RESTRICTED DELIVERYShow to whom and date delivered......

l RESTRICTED DELIVERYM Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.m-I (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)

JJZ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:

:-4

M (Always obtain Wigndipe oif iaurm me or agent)mo I have received the article described above.

-SIGNATURE [I Addressee 0 Authorized agent

m

m

o6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE CLERK'SINITIALS

*~GPO: 1977-0-249-595

CERTIFIED IMAILRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Rodney A. Smith, TreasurerNational Republican Senatorial Committee227 VNassachusetts Avenue, N.B.Washington, D.C. 20002

RE: MUR 820

W ~Dear lyr. Smith:

The Federal Election Comission has received a coraplaitwhich alleges that the National Republican Senatorial Colmmittee

C (JRSC) committed certain violations of the Federal Election

Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"1). A copy of thecom~plaint is attached. We have numbered this matter MUR 820.Th"ke Coi~sion has reason to believe that the matters allgqeciin the comiplaint state a violation of 2 U.S.C. 944la(d).Cpecificallyr, it appaxrs that.

1) NRSC reports filed with the Commission on October 10,Irl9793 (October M~onthly Repott) and on October 28, 197~3

C-1 (10-Day Pre-Electhoi Report) recite a total of $211,70t).in ",,44la(d) expenditures' on behalf of James Martin,

cr, Republican Candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama.This figure does not include expenditures made by the

No- NR{SC on behalf of can&de Martin after October 23,1978.

2) The Coiknhission's published calculations for partyspending limits for Congressional contests ('S44la(d)limiitations) limit the national and state committees6f the Republican Party to spending a maximum of

62,5o(;.94 each on behilf of the Republic candidate,-,-,-for Senate in the state of Alabam.

3) If the N~ational Republican Senatorial Committee actedas the authorized agent of both the National Rep..ublicanCommittee and the Alabama Republican Party, its totalsperi~tiIiq limit or. behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatoriial1caiqmNifn was ;$125,013.38 .-- approximately $86,687. lessthan already reported by the NRSC.

-2-

The above facts supp.ort the Coirumnssion's finding of reeaonto believe that NRSC may have violated 2U.S.C. §44la(d) bymaking expenditures in connection with the Senatorial campalqnof James Martin of Alabaii-a in excess of that provision of th~eAct.

Unider the Act, you have an appottunity to demonstrate thatno action should be taken against you. Please submit any factualo~r legal materials which you believe are relevant to the Commission~'sanalysis of this matter. In addition, please submit the following:

1) Written agreements authorizing the NRSC to act as the,agent for both the Republican National Cormrittee andthe Alabama Republican Party in the expenditure ",,-441a (d)"funds in Alabama.

2) An itemized listing of all "N44la(d) bxpendlittures'made by the NRMSC in connection with James Mlartin' sSenatorial cajaign in AlUabaria made by the CSC

TV4here approppoate. state'fient's should be submittedI undleroath.

The Coir-ssion is undf er a duty to iinvestigate this iiattrexpditousy. herefore, your response should, be submitted7

within ten days after your receipt of this notification.

If you have any questions, please contact '.Mathleen. ImigPerkins, the:- attorney assigned to t~his miatter, at 202/523-4060.

T'his m.1atter will remain confidential in accordiance with2 U.,S.C. ""437g(a) (3) (B-') unale-ss gou notify th-e Commission inw,.ritinc- that you wish the investigatio± to be miade publlic.

If you intenC, to be revpresented by counsel in th-is i:matter,please hiave such counsel so notify ws in writing7.

Sincere:ly,

N"illiam C. OldkitirCo.nvrcil Cou.-nsel


In the Matter of)

National Republican Senatorial Committee)MUR 820

CERTIFICATION

I, Marjorie W. Emmons, Secretary to the Federal

Election Commission, do hereby certify that on December 22,

1978, the Commission determined by a vote of 6-0 to approve

the proposed letter to the respondent which was attached

to the General Counsel's memorandum dated December 19, 1978.

Attest:

Date Marjorie W. EmmonsSecretary to the Commission

N

Received in Office of Commission Secretary: 12-20-78, 11:42Circulated on 48 hour vote basis! 12-20-78, 3:30

/,2 -.2.2 --7

Date

112

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K SIRKEEI N.W.WASHINGTON,D.C. 20463

MEMORANDUM TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CHARLES STEELE

MARJORIE W. EMMONSXLg -4 t --DECEMBER 21, 1978

Comments on MUR 820 (78)

Attached is Commissioner Springer's vote sheet on

MUR 820 with his comments.

ATTACHMENT:vote sheet

w.

~ ~ ~43 H')UI% TALLY S!JEET

p4': 3FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K STR[ET N.WWASHINGTON,I DC. 20463

Date and Time Transmitted: Dec. 20,, 1978 -

Commi ss ioner SPRINGER, AIKENS, TIERNAN, MCGARRYt THOMSON,

* ~ ~ ,RETURN TO OFFICE OF COMMISSION SECRETARY BY: De mbr2,17

~MUR No. 820 Letter and Memorandum, dated 12-19-78

Y~ S.)I approve the recommendation

S()I object to the recommendation

COMMENTS:

'Date: WivlAIr Signature:

* THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL WILL TAKE NO ACTION IN THIS MATTERUNTIL THE APPROVAL OF FOUR COMMISSIONERS IS RECEIVED. PLEASERETURN ALL PAPERS NO LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SHOWN ABOVE TOTHE OFFICE OF COMMISSION SECRETARY. ONE OBJECTION PLACES THE ITE~lON THE EXECUTIVE SESSIrlN AGENDA.

T 0

Ip

a.

'I

DEcember 20,r 1978

MEMORANDUM TO:

P'ROM:

SUJFJCT:

Marge Emmons

Elissa T. Garr

MUR 820

Please have the attached letter and memo on

MOP 82n disteibuted to the Comrmission on a 48

hour tally basis.

Thank you.

It

* fl'-I.

:.BY

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSIONI Q5 K S IRI[L! N.W.W'ASHIING ION,D)(. 20463

December 19, 1978

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

THE COMMISSION

WILLIAM4 C. OLDAKE *,

MUR 820 (Letter to R spondent)

Attached for your consideration is a proposed letter to

be sent to the respondent in MUR 820.

We recommend that the Commission approve this letterfor mailing.

7t DEC,

* FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1325 K STRE[T N.W

WASHINCTON,D.C. 20463



RE: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Smith:

V The Federal Election Commission has received a complaintwhich alleges that the National Republican Senatorial Committee(NRSC) committed certain violations of the Federal ElectionIII Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of thecomplaint is attached. We have numbered this matter MUR 820.The Commission has reason to believe that the matters allegedIi in the complaint state a violation of 2 U.S.C. S44la(d).Specifically, it appears that:

1) NRSC reports filed with the Commission on October 10,1978 (October Monthly Report) and on October 28, 1978(0 -Day Pre-Election Report) recite a total of $211,700.

in "S44la(d) expenditures" on behalf of James Martin,Republican Candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama.This figure does not include expenditures made by theNRSC on behalf of candidate Martin after October 23,1978.

2) The Commission's published calculations for partyspending limits for Congressional contests ("S44la(d)limitations) lmtthe nainland saecommitteesof the Republican Party to spending a maximum of$62,506.94 each on behalf of the Republic candidatefor Senate in the state of Alabama.

3) If the National Republican Senatorial Committee actedas the authorized agent of both the National RepublicanCommittee and the Alabama Republican Party, its totalspending limit on behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatorialcampaign was $125,013.38 -- approximately $86,687. lessthan already reported by the NRSC.

-2-

The above facts support the Commission's finding of reasonto believe that NRSC may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) bymaking expenditures in connection with the Senatorial campaignof James Martin of Alabama in excess of that provision of theAct.


1) Written agreements authorizing the NRSC to act as theagent for both the Republican National Committee andthe Alabama Republican Party in the expenditure "S44la(d)"funds in Alabama.

2) An itemized listing of all "S44la(d) expenditures"made by the NRSC in connection with James Martin'sSenatorial campaign in Alabama made by the NRSC.

Where appropriate, statements should be submitted underoath.

The Commission is under a duty to investigate this matterexpeditiously. Therefore, your response should be submittedwithin ten days after your receipt of this notification.

0If you have any questions, please contact Kathleen ImigPerkins, the attorney assigned to this matter, at 202/523-4060.

This matter will remain confidential in accordance with2 U.S.C. S437g(a) (3) (B) unless you notify the Commission inwriting that you wish the investigation to be made public.


Sincerely,


0 0



National RepublicanSenatorial Committee

CERTIFICATION

I, Lena L. Stafford, Recording Secretary for the

Executive Session of the Federal Election Commission

held December 13, 1978, at a meeting at which a quorum

was present, do hereby certify that the Commission

determined by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions

in MUR 820:

1. Find reason to believe that the NationalRepublican Senatorial Committee may haveviolated 2 U.S.C. §441a (d) by makingexpenditures in connection with theSenatorial campaign of James Martin ofAlabama in excess of that provision of theAct.

2. Refer Recommendations 2 and 3 containedin the General Counsel's Report datedDecember 6, 1978, to the Reports AnalysisDivision to be handled under normal proceduresfor possible failure to report certainin-kind contributions or misrepresentingthem as operating expenses.

(continued on page 2)

0___

MUR 820 (78)General Counsel's ReportDated: December 6, 1978CERTIFICATION

3. Revise the letter attached to the GeneralCounsel's report of December 6, 1978,and circulate it to the Commission on ano-objection basis.

Attest:

--7--4 at.--

Lena L. StaffordRecording Secretary

F C/a

Received in Office of Commission Secretary: 12-6-78, 3:18Circulated on 48 hour vote basis: 12-7-78, 9:00Objection filed: 12/11/78, 11:50Placed on Agenda for December 13, 1978

Date

_T

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION1.125 K S IREI:I N.W

~/ WASHING IOND.C. 20463


FROM: MARJORIE W. EM1ONSfr 4 Jil hDATE: DECEMBER 11, 1978

SUBJECT: OBJECTION - MUR 820 - First General Counsel'sReport dated 12-6-78Received in OCS:12-6-78, 3:18

The above-named document was circulated on a

48 hour vote basis at 9:00, December 7, 1978.

Your office was notified via a certification at

11:30, December 11, 1978, that the recommendations were

approved by a vote of 4-0.

Commissioner Aikens submitted an objection at 11:53,

December 11, 1978 thereby placing MUR 820 on the Executive

Session Agenda for December 13, 1978.

Please destroy the above-mentioned certification.

December 6, 1978

MEMORANDUM TO: Marge BVuons


SUBJE~CT: MUR 820

Please have the attached First General Counsel's Report

on MUR 820 distributed to the Commission a 48 hour tally

basis.

Thank you.

*FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSI*6;%.1325 K Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20463-,-,

FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S RED~6P3

DATE AND TIME OF TRANSMITTAL GMUR NO. 820BY OGC TO THE COMMISSION DEJ 617 DATE COMPLAINT RECEIVED

BY OGC___________STAFFMEMBER Perkins/Thedford

SOURCE: Donald Stewart U.S. Senate Committee (The Friends of DonaldStewart Committee)

RESPONDENT'S NAME: National Republican Sentorial Committee

RELEVANT STATUTE: 2 U. S.C. S44la (d) ; 11 C.F. R. S110. 7(a) (4);2 U.S.C. S434; 2 U.S.C. S44la.

~,INTERNAL REPORTS CHECKED: National Republican Senatorial Committee,Alabama Republican Party - Federal Account, Republican National Committee,

Vl' Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee,DNC Services Corporation; AO 1976-108.

FEDERAL AGENCIES CHECKED:

BACKGROUND

C The Friends of Donald Stewart Committee filed a complaint allegingthat the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) exceeded the

Sspending limitations contained in 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) in the Senatorialr~Campaign of James Martin of Alabama. The complaint states that theCommission's published calculations for party spending limits forCongressional contests (S44la(d) limitations) would limit the nationaland state committees of the Republican Party to spending a maximum of$62,506.94 each on behalf of the Republican candidate for Senate from thestate of Alabama. See Attached Appendix A. Thus, the Republican NationalCommittee and the Alabama Republican State Committee could spend no morethan a combined total of $125,013.88 in connection with the general electioncampaign of James Martin.

Reports filed by the NRSC on October 10, 1978 (October Monthly Report)and on October 28, 1978 (10-Day Pre-Election Report) recite a total of$211,700 in S44la(d) expenditures on behalf of candidate Martin. Even ifthe NRSC is assuming the §441a(d) expenditure limitation of both theRepublican National Committee and the Alabama Republican Party, this amountwould exceed the §441a(d) limitation for candidate Martin's campaign by$86,687. This figure does not include any S44la(d) expenditures made by theNRSC on behalf of candidate Martin after October 23, 1978. Such expenditureswill presumably be reported on the committee's 30-Day Post Election Reportdue December 7, 1978.

-2-

The complaint also alleges that the Federal Election Campaign Actof 1971, as amended, (FECA) does not "authorize the NRSC to act as thedesignated agent of the Alabama Republican State Committee for thepurpose of making section 441a(d) expenditures." The complaint statesthat FEC regulations and Advisory Opinion 1976-108 would permit the NRSCto act as the agent of the Republican National Committee for the purposeof making S44la(d) expenditures. 11 C.F.R. SllO.7(a) (4). However,complainant argues that no FECA provision or regulation would permit theNRSC to enter into a similar agency agreement with the Alabama RepublicanParty and thereby assume the State Party's S44la(d) limitation in additionto that of the National Party.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

2 U.S.C. S44la(d) provides the following exception to FECA'scontribution and expenditure limitations for national and State

GD committees:

.. (3) The national committee of a political party, ora State Committee of a political party, including any

tO subordinate committee of a State committee, may not makeany expenditure in connection with the general electioncampaign of a candidate for Federal office in a State who

tf% is affiliated with such party which exceeds --(A) in the case of a candidate for election to theoffice of Senator.. .the greater of --

(i) two cents mutiplied by the voting age populationof the State ... ; or(ii) $20,000; ... 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) (3).

CPursuant to S44la(d), the Commission calculated the spending limitations0for political parties for Senatorial candidates. The 1978 limit onparty spending for Senate candidates in the state of Alabama in the general

,election was $62,506.94. See Attached Appendix A. Therefore, theRepublican National Committee and the Alabama Republican Committee were eachlimited to expenditures of $62,506.94 in connection with the generalelection campaign of Jim Martin for Senate in Alabama.

FEC regulations, however, provide that the national committee of apolitical party may make such expenditures through a designated agent:

... (4) The national committee of a political party may makeexpenditures authorized by this section through any designatedagent, including State and subordinate party committees.11 C.F.R. SllO.7(a) (4).

Therefore, the Republican National Committee could designate the NationalRepublican Senatorial Committee to make expenditures on its behalf under§441a(d). See also Advisory Opinion 1976-108.

-3-

The complaint filed by the Friends of Donald Stewart Committeequestions whether the Alabama Republican Party could designate the NationalRepublican Senatorial Committee as its agent to make S44la(d) expendituresin connection with the general election campaign of Candidate Martin.Although FEC's regulations refer only to such an agency agreement betweena national committee of a political party and any designated agent, thestated purpose of the regulation was to allow "the national committee andthe state and subordinate State committees of a political party to makecoordinated expenditures in the general election..." See Exlnainand Justification of Regulations at 16 (July 1978). I oudseem tatthe goal of coordinate prty expenditures could be achieved by allowingthe State Party to designate a national committee of the Party as itsagent as well as by allowing the National Party to designate a Statecommittee as its agent.

In addition, the fact that FECA permits unlimited transfers betweennational and State political committees would indicate that such an

Sagency agreement would be permissible between the State committee andthe National Committee. See 2 U.S.C. S441(a)(4). In other words, if

S11 C.F.R. SllO.7(a) (4) is read to allow such agency agreements fornational committees but not for state committees, the Republican National

%Committee could merely transfer the maximum in allowable S44la(d)Sexpenditures ($62,506.94 for the Alabama Senatorial campaign) to the StateCommittee. Such a requirement would seem to place form over substance

1,rs since the national and state party committees could be presumed to beworking toward the same goal and probably even coordinating campaignstrategy in connection with the Senatorial campaigns. Therefore, it isthe opinion of the Office of General Counsel that the National Republican

C~Senatorial Committee could make "S44la(d) expenditures" as agent for-~both the National Republican Committee and the Alabama Republican Committeein connection withthe Senatorial campaign of candidate Martin in Alabama.

Thus, if the National Republican Senatorial Committee was acting asthe designated agent for both the Republican National Committee and theAlabama Republican Committee, it could have spent a total of $125,013.88in connection with the general election campaign of James Martin forSenate in Alabama. Since the NRSC reports recite a total of $211,700 inS44la(d) expenditures for candidate Martin, there is reason to believethat the NRSC exceeded the spending limits as defined in 2 U.S.C. S44la(d).

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS

Initial investigation of NRSC Reports in connection with this matterdisclosed an additional apparent violation in reporting certain expendituresas operating expenditures. On December 19, 1977, the Commission advisedthe NRSC that its payment of official expenses of Republican senatorswould not be considered a contribution or expenditure "as long as thepayment is not made for the purpose of influencing their nomination orelection." See AO 1977-50. The Advisory Opinion is limited to thequestion of payment of official expenses of senators by the NRSC.

-4-

NRSC reports indicate that NRSC has been making such expendituresand reporting them on FEC Form 3, line 20(a) as "operating expenses."Thus, NRSC's October Monthly Report includes the following expendituresas "loperating expenses:

Subscription (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 $70.00Subscription (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 19.50Subscription (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 30.60Film Processing (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 101.59One Photo (Sen. Javits) 9/13/78 15.75Public Affairs Counsel (Sen Dole) 9/13/78-1,000.00

Such expenditures might reasonably be concluded to fall within thepermissible parameters of AO 1977-50. If such is the case, NRSC's ownstated procedure would indicate that the Committee would have on filefor each such expenditure a request form submitted by the Senator con-

rn tamning "the requested amount, the purpose of the expense, a certificationthat the expense was not incurred for the purpose of influencing a federal

felection and the signature of the requesting Senator." See AO 1977-50 at1.

However, in addition to such expenditures possibly relating to anincumbent's official duties, the NRSC report of operating expenses also

"~includes similar expenditures to non-incumbent candidates for Senate.Thus, NRSC's September 30th Report includes the following as "operatingexpenses"

Postage (Thad Cochran, U.S. Senate) 9/20/78 $127.50Postage (Bill Armstrong, U.S. Senate) 9/21/78 75.00Postage (Don Shasteen, U.S. Senate) 9/31/78 3,000.00

CTyping Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate)9/26/78-2,090.05Air Travel (Nancy Kassebaum, U.S. Senate) 9/26/78 305.00Direct Mail Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate) 9/27/78-8,929.80

N Direct Mail Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate) 9/27/78-7,140.00

None of the above-named individuals was a Senator at the time of the listedexpenditures. Therefore, these expenditures would not be justified aspayment of official expenses of Senators pursuant to AO 1977-50. In addition,the expenditures are the type which, made approximately 6 weeks prior tothe election, could be presumed to be in connection with the election andtherefore in-kind contributions to the individual candidates.

Thus, there is reason to believe that the NRSC may have violatedthe disclosure provisions of 2 U.S.C. S434 by reporting certain in-kindcontributions as operating expenses. In addition, there is reason tobelieve that the NRSC may have violated the contribution limitations of2 U.S.C. §441a when those in-kind contributions, reported as operatingexpenses, are combined with the reported contributions to each candidate.

-5-

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Find reason to believe that the National Republican SenatorialCommittee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) by making expenditures inconnection with the Senatorial campaign of James Martin of Alabama inexcess of that provision of the Act.

2. Find reason to believe that the National Republican SenatorialCommittee may have violated 2 U.S. C. S434 by reporting certain in-kindcontributions as party operating expenses.

3. Find reason to believe that the National Republican SenatorialCommittee may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la when certain in-kind contri-butions, reported as operating expenses, are combined with the reported

-contributions to each candidate.

4. Send the attached letter

ATTACHMENTSIf'

1. Letter to Respondent.

2. Copy of complaint.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION110*132" K S I iLEI N.W.01 WAY11IN(;I Dr.C. 20463



RE: MUR 820

Dear Mr. Smith:

The Federal Election Commission has received a complaintwhich alleges that the National Republican Senatorial Committee(NRSC) committed certain violations of the Federal ElectionCampaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of thecomplaint is attached. We have numbered this matter MUR 820.The Commission has reason to believe that the matters allegedin the complaint state a violation of 2 U.S.C. S44la(d). Inaddition, in reviewing NRSC reports in connection with thismatter, the Commission noted that the reports indicate reasonto believe that a violation of 2 U.S.C. SS434, 441a(a) hasalso occurred. Specifically, it appears that:

1) NRSC reports filed with the Commission on October 10,1978 (October Monthly Report) and on October 28, 1978(10-Day Pre-Election Report) recite a total of $211,700.in "S44la(d) expenditures" on behalf of James Martin,Republican Candidate for Senate in the state of Alabama.This figure does not include expenditures made by theNRSC on behalf of candidate Martin after October 23,1978.

2) The Commission's published calculations for partyspending limits for Congressional contests ("S44la(d)limitations) limit the national and state committeesof the Republican Party to spending a maximum of$62,506.94 each on behalf of the Republic candidatefor Senate in the state of Alabama.

3) If the National Republican'Senatorial Committee actedas the authorized agent of both the National RepublicanCommittee and the Alabama Republican Party, its totalspending limit on behalf of Candidate Martin's Senatorialcampaign was $125,013.38 -- approximately $86,687. lessthan already reported by the NRSC.

- 11111111 10

-2-

4) In addition, NRSC's October Monthly Report(for the period September 1-30, 1978) reportscertain "operating expenses"~ which are allocatedto individual Senators. As an example,

Subscription (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 $ 70.00Subscription (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 19.50Subscription (Sen. Weicker) -9/13/78 30.60Film Processing (Sen. Weicker) 9/13/78 101.59One Photo (Sen Javits) 9/13/78 15.75Public Affairs Counsel (Sen. Dole) 9/13/78-$1,000.00

5) The same report (October Monthly) also includes thefollowing as "operating expenses":

Postage (Thad Cochran, U.S. Senate) 9/20/78 - $127.50VJ'~ Postage (Bill Armstrong, U.S. Senate) 9/21/78 -$75.00tO Postage (Don Shasteen, U.S. Senate) 9/21/78-$3,000.00

Typing Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate) 9/26/78 -

$2,090.05Air Travel (Nancy Kassebaum, U.S. Senate) 9/25/78-$305.00Direct Mail Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate) 9/27/78-

$8,929.80Direct Mail Services (Dave Durenberger, U.S. Senate) 9/27/78-cl $7,140.00

The above facts support the Commission's finding of reason

C11 to believe that NRSC may have violated 2 U.S.C. S44la(d) bymaking expenditures in connection with the Senatorial campaignof James Martin of Alabama in excess of that provision of theAct; 2 U.S.C. S434 by reporting certain in-kind contributionsas party operating expenses; and 2 U.S.C. S44la(a) when certainin-kind contributions, reported as operating expenses are combinedwith the reported contributions to each candidate.


1) Written agreements authorizing the NRSC to act as theagent for both the Republican National Committee andthe Alabama Republican Party in the expenditure "§441a(d)"funds in Alabama.

2) An itemized listing of all "§441a(d) expenditures"made by the INRSC in connection with James Martin'sSenatorial campaign in Alabama made by the NRSC.

-3-

3) An itemized listing of any expenditures made by theNRSC during 1978, reported as "operating expenses"and allocated to individual Senatorial candidates orSenators.

4) Supporting documentation that such expenditures,reported as "operating expenses", were not inconnection with a federal election.

Where appropriate, statements should be submitted underoath.

The Commission is under a duty to investigate this matterexpeditiously. Therefore, your response should be submittedwithin ten days after your receipt of this notification.

If you have any questions, please contact Kathleen ImigPerkins, the attorney assigned to this matter, at 202/523-4060.

This matter will remain confidential in accordance with2 U.S.C. §437g(a) (3) (B) unless you notify the Commission inwriting that you wish the investigation to be made public.


Sincerely,


Cflnnvam3

t 5-- 1'5-/4t4~9W

U.S. SenateOffice of the General CounselFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, N.W.Washington, D. C. 20463 807653Dear Sir:

The Friends of Donald Stewart Committee, a political committee supporting

the candidacy of Donald Stewart for the United States Senate, files this complaintalleging that the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) has violated

the party spending limitations contained in section 441a (d) of the Federal Election

Campaign Act. In the current general election campaign for U. S. Senate in Alabama,

NRSC has expended $194,700 on behalf of the Republican candidate Jim Martin,which is $69, 686.12 in excess of the limits under section I441a (d) . This grossviolation of the law by NRSC, which has resulted in the expenditure of thousands

of illegal dollars in the Alabama Senate election, requires the Federal Election Commission'ss

most urgent attention.

According to published FEC calculations, the national and state committees

of a political party may each spend a maximum $62, 506.94 under section 441a (d)

on behalf of a candidate for the United States Senate in Alabama. See Appendix

", A (with relevant figures underlined) attached to this complaint. Thus the RepublicanNational Committee and the Alabama Republican State Committee may spend no more

than a combined total of $125,013.88 on behalf of Jim Martin. Yet between September

1, 1978 and October 19, 1978 the NRSC, acting as a designated agent of the national

and state Republican committees, has spent $194,700 in expenditures on behalfof Mr. Martin -- $69,686.12 inby NRSC's own reports to theunlawful monies are recorded

excess of the legal limit. This violation is documentedFEC, f iled October 10 and October 28, where theseon Schedule F. */See appendix B and Appendix C,

*/Schedule F also confirms that the designated NRSC is proceeding onthe theory that it may act as the designated agent of both the RepublicanNational Committee and the Alabama Republican State Committee inmaking those 441a (d) expenditures.

P0. Box 2274Anniston. Alabama 36201(205) 237-9311

2727'2 Seventh Avenue SouthBirmingham, Alabama 35233(205) 252-5204 (205) 252-5064

Au ouriz#!' d atd oin~~ hV for# Friend,, of 0I),d StrO N30 COITrr,r-.oe' \ilh,;n o, rr Det';.rr Trlis,;re P 0 PK 221'4 Anr ocrn Aabor ia? 01

Office of the General CounselFederal Election CommissionNovember 3, 1978page two

The Friends of Donald Stewart Committee further alleges that the Actdoes not authorize the NRSC to act as the designated agent of the Alabama RepublicanState Committee for the purpose of making section 441a (d) expenditures. Section110.7(a) (14) of the FEC's regulations, together with the FEC's own Advisory Opinion1976-108, make allowance only for an agency agreement under section 441a (d)

between NRSC and the Republican National Committee, thereby enabling NRSC,as the agent for the National Committee, to spend a maximum $62, 506.94 on behalf

of Mr. Martin. No legal grounds exist for a similar agency agreement betweenNRSC and the Alabama State Republican Committee -- but NRSC assumes nonethelessthat it may enter into such an agreement and spend an additional $62, 506. 94 on

behalf of Mr. Martin. If the Commission concurs with the Friends of Donald Stewart

that NRSC has misconstrued its authority under section 441a (d) , and cannot act

%0 as agent for the State Committee, then NRSC has exceeded the lawful limit underthat section by $132,193.06.

The party spending allowed for under section 441a (d) is substantial,

and should have been sufficient to satisfy the NRSC. Instead this committee has

made a mockery of the limit contained in section 4I41a (d); it has Unleashed a flood

of funds well in excess of the lawful limit, an action which expresses this committee'sdisregard of the law, and which undermines prospects for a fair election to the

United States Senate in Alabama.

C, This complaint is filed by me on behalf of Donald Stewart's candidacy

for the United States Senate from Alabama.

Sincerely yours,

~AMES HOWARD STEWART, JR.t') 701 Knollwood Drive

Anniston, Alabama 36201Telephone Number (205) 236-5367

Campaign Chairman

Office of the General CounselFederal Election CommissionPage 3

STATE OF ALABAMA)

JEFFERSON COUNTY)

Before the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State of

Alabama at large, personally appeared JAMES HOWARD STEWART, JR.,

who being known or made known to me and by me first duly sworn, on

his oath stated that the facts stated in the above and foregoing complaint

signed by him this day are true.

Given under my hand and seal this the, jj--day of November,1978.

Notary PLbl ic7

a

APPENDIX A

PARTY SPENDING LIMITS FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONTESTS

The Federal Election Commission has calculated the spending limitations for politicalpaerties for congressional candidates. The limits, are effective for 1978. Back reference.-L.,w 9 140.

PARTY COORDINATEDEXPENDITURE LIMITS - 1978

under the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended,and the FEC regulations, there are special limits on expen.ditures made by political parties on behalf of candidates inste general election (2 U.S.C. §441a(d), 11 CFR 110.7).These special party expenditures count neither as contribu.tions to the candidate not as expenditures by the candidateor te candidate's authorized committees. The expendituresmust, however, be reported by the partyr committee onSchedule F, FEC Form 3. revised January 1978.

National polfitical$ party committees have separate expendi.ture limits for Senate and House candidates in the generalelection.

State political party committees are entitled to separateexpenditure limits for Senate and House general electioncandidates in their State. Within a State. all expendituresmade on behalf of one candidate by the State party com-mince or any subordinate party committee (e.g., county,district, local) are subject to one expenditure limit.

The formulas for the party spending limits in 1978 arebased on State voting age population estimates (as of July1. 1977) from the Department of Commerce, and the Con-sumer Price Index increase certified by the Secretary ofLabor. They are calculated as follows:

Senatorial:State Voting Age Population (VAP) xt S0.02, plus the1978 increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) of22.9 percent; or S24,580.00, whichever is greater.(See chart below.)

Congressional:111 S12,290.00. for House candidates in States with more

than one district (and candidates for Delegate fromthe District of Columbia, Guam and the VirginIslands; or for Resident Commisaioner from PuertoRico): or .

2) The Senate limit for the State, for House candidatesin States with only one district. (See chirt below.)

PARTY SPENDING LIMITSFOR SENATE CANDIDATES

'The Commission has compiled the following chart for1978 limits on party spending for Senate candidates in thegeneral election. In the chart, an asterisk I*) indicates thoseStates having only one Representative. in these instances.the Senate limit applies for these candidates instead of theHouse limitation. This exception does not apply so candi.dales for Deleigate. (District of Columbia. Guam, VirginIslands) or Resident Commissioner (Puerto Rico).

Alal

ArizArkCaliColConDelFloGecHiaIdal1llirIndlowKarKerLosMaMaMaMicMirMisMisMoNelNeNe'NeNeNeNoNoOhOkOrPeRhsosoTaTaUsVeViWiWiWi

Di

PtVI

VAPState (in thousands)

bama 2,543ka_ 258ona 1.562ansas 1,494fornia 15.627orado 1.828necticut .2.238

aware, 407rida 6,219irgia 3,450vi 615

ho 574sois 7,873maa 3,690a 2,025

Isas 1,684itucky 2,402uisiana 2.609ine 756ryland 2,921ssachusetts 4,166higan 6,284

inesoita 2,765sissippi 1,575souri 3,417ntana 523braska 1.095vada' 439we Hampshire 594w Jersey 5,224w Mexico 783w York 12,879rth Carolina 3,864rth Dakota*. 450io 7,484lahoma 1,994egon 1.695rsnsylvania 8,508ode Island 673

uth Carolina 1,953uth Dakota 475nnessee 3,028UiS 8.773its 797rmons . 336

rginia 3.631ashingtors 2,589sit Virginia 1.313isconsin 3,244

ominn .278

strict ofColumbiauamerto Rico

irgin Islands

50549

2.0 1059

S6? .506 9424,580.0038,393.9636.722.52

384,111.664.932.2455,010.0424.580.00

152.863.0284.801.0024.580.0024.580.00

193,518.34-90,700.2049.774.5040.901.1259,041.1664.129.2224.580.0071.799.18

107,.40G.28154,460.7267,963.7038.713.5083.989.8624.580.0026,915.1024.580.0024.580.00

128.405.9224,580.00

316.565.8?94.97 7.1224,580.00

113,956.7249,012.5?41,663.10

209,126.6424,580.0048.004.7424.580.0074,42S.24

215,640.3424.580.0024.580.0089,249.9863.637.6232.273.5479,737.5224,580.00

12,290.0012,290.0012,290.0012.290.00

APPENDIX B

*~~~~~4 -"__-~*~

A

"tC .0e FMR A CAODTi CR cc=ITTU - -: 4

C-- nC mmAT)O 00 EIL TMHT0 v=RAXn13 -0% V, 50.0 %lo

J~n! C 204It 00042 Vj~~

Poo Co-'~ootI'eh Os~ aeb""Opoef to*4k*.4ft

* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O IP e'"de aQtp Acdgo~tr Aj..10(AwM a@b 'C"9'C0 ]l4~ ~ a~aP0'

D-~~ .-200

W a s tiste?' V oss allo. E~@*~l c i t O

C." -l r i ot1 %c d as* s. a~lrp 9zai POVI' 1 C Oro*,tId

4 ra aI0 0 400 O* *CW &If b* E dtTerftda #ccotprce,nte4 aaCe= vl aConvrot~n, 1

Cl~~~~~~~~~~~1 CAma ,co .-. a.bGC.,. ]Cv- 0mw-Cf~.et

D~~ ~ ~ ~ -00.t. foo *lon -

iZSo'! CintoO CM6fo

A3C3aad.I~hcbd0C ~ 2,1,6.0 *1

CA so 1,0000.0 Staff at~131..J date#S14i~21

&"Vn t

_3 0 1 9 8174.S' *a3, i- wC s.te ad~ 1 o ~ .' _17.10OO ___________________

13 C,%j or d 0. S ~

ICc-0.tE- ea. '

10 :a%- Tod ve

9 a a 2.0 s.'oce 1.412.56 . S~a..b I ' C42voC6at

S-4~~ 1d02 t- aca

13 r.- 1- S:f~'calt .&% aw de&Io SCf1 ' a S00A~~3

A~~~~~~~~~~~t ~~ ~ ~ Q mO iOtdPClWD ~ ecp 3 J0 ~ y n pvWOA and putp0M ? A' tre.t carntt~bf@ on co an'co ,'v

.1 * ,.1 . 778**Toe Nam of'. raw* o-Cro~tl''em.rpo

~m-

4 ~ ~ I, 'ir

0 1

s .738.0..sio.63.64

'-'.

SdS..50bo c "* W.. v0

ow"at 1 c" S~v( A e~dVA f So"0o"" 47.263.57

kc) C OP b u ' . it d

4 7W '

2 6I-I O3'S ,-57.

5 46,300.91

k, I SIluta

Ic) tg~ 0 *v it Recive

FtvCWIAl

S 8

S ..

I. 5, . "l

22. r~m"O~i 5 "die 1,200,.000.00 1

Sb To ~ " ' 6trwZ a ctuOS.qe#I igfs 1,0 0 0.0 s 2.0 ,0 00.0

2. C'o ' .dippo Empq- b P 01'414 Cor"" 1 2 t S C 4 1 ldit

25.Ta~ Eaas.IFW' .. .

5 1 ,200.000 00 s 2,000,000.0

2. Tauh4 Evo.d ~ .90

P .r ..... . ...

t' t 26. Tot,~mi I s It omlne 19,)~ . .. ... ....

-~~~-2 31co line

f2w"" ..

5UC I ~...... .... ....... ... ..

NY2 U..C441(.SpwigL4 24 E Fit3

aw ~ ~b ~.~m *G

IdulCwww hw ' ~ sa ~w ~a~ ~ nd~e

400~ff Obec Park Driv byat ftow U.S.~m SeNate )aedi A6 ver4i4i4

Birnlnghm, aiona 35223 laana &eaor~ PrograeeExp ng -1782tu0.Cre _

.I#a hom* e. &W Add"wvd Z I O Coft #=w'., @9 F.~w cwmu.csie S'.pon.! P'I.ChilWI @9LO.i~v. Ot, e t________________________9_w" O Dw.6ct& Office s.e4't I_________ i.

R.nielsan & Associates Inc. o aueam Hda detsn 917 00'0 60 Offic arknu e Martn frUS.nt eaAvetsn

F ul kav',* Mi.' ftg Aaoumw oo in 1~ ZP COON, o"o 0wY 90ad an.d.0.l. swapoon19. p&w.ww1 o Dole7~~' Ot 0 r I nc..

of Each PPvWe & 0f440 Sakeght d#V. V~)

KansaahPinigCop Ctzns for Pasey ldaAvriin 0000

63 - 9t vneKna

Ne Yok 1Ne3 Yot1assSre I lios0030ttl evce -- 81,4.O~

Fhanac Printin Corr~~ w~ZI . Citizens foru Pec11,0 es As=Stee Illinois Pritiw'S sex'~fve 9-5-78 tIh.=t*

Chiago Ilioi M

Rome.nek Golub & Conpany Citizens for Percy Ionthly rent for I8 South Michigan Ave. Illinois Iof fice space I9-5-73 1,487.54

625 N. Michigan Ave.Chicago. Illinois 60611

ae Tft *AW5 atI

Full Njovv. M*04%9 Ad~ru 0-0 ZIP Coo w. ' es.Ca00*t ~oou. P'twaS@ 'b .we9v ? ~~t*. A'~

*I Eac Ivy 01.

Bailey, Deardourff & tAs sociates ICitizens for Percy j Xedia Advertising a9-5-78 l0.C,00Suite 01120 Illinois733 -15th St., N. W.Wasbin~gton, D. C. 2

07'

A- ~_- k.-- .

I I

1= £M -&LMI .-

-7

-C)J EEHAL. CP CA X AT FOM FEE SRAL-1 VFC

so" NA 9 2 .S.C. 44taWd) Po .. 0 4. V &FC Fwft.

OZc. 20"3 Lhwoig n 24. FEC F0411 3)I

be so" -nl &Vtw Pubwe T~wfb.b 60 PIh.m Cootea 640

11etialL Republican S~aoIa ow~t*X@iU*

-VU wn w Republican National andior.Respeetlye State Ccrdttee -'-

F~~~dI6 aoe3 &hu A o ZIP Caft NoVV @4FSoetu CA06.@M &%*Parma. Do"s0 Ip'~ve bg yTn* mu

of ,-c ftV anso.(oa4ofc ~

Daniels & Associates Martin for U.S.Senate Media Advertising 9-19-78 25,00

402 Office Park Drive AlabaI

suite 110Birmngham, Alabama

3522.3 AwseCseat C oa i 4too E________

of Each PwvirStt D.m.ci Of4* SOW01~*ya'

C4 DellTeaphy Durenberger for Senate ITelephonc service 9-19-7 3,500.1432 Soo line Building M{innesotaMinneapolis. Rneota

Ice to~ Ca'%6CM19 -s S_________

L3 A hem" '.v~. M&.-ft A00o" wt-d ZIP Coa Psn tPPofCo~..S~ove.~ tcw~on of EM~3wrV Cst 1-onth

of Each pwv* Sute*q Dtjict off"1c so.4e ,,yw

S1basteen for Senate Don Shasteen Sec. 441

820 South 13th Street IU.S. Senate Contribution 1 9-20-78 *0 0

S Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Nebraska

PwtS pWY.. &Ao4"~ Ad0'e sd Zip Coo. hwY..l of 30r, Cwdo. . S.Voon"d PWI'tcueCI at .Lve-Wt Date I 'A"nc"

of Eacft ft wo Stste. o..uc Aoff-Co qu. Vow

Paul P. O-.ergaard .-

Creenbriar Apartments Durenberger for Senate Political 9-20-78 1,500.00t

10401 s. cedar La'ke Rd. )~oeoaConsultingtKinnetornkn. Mjinnesota C

55343 .

of Eachm Puv..Stt. o*vc &Otc.S g'

Tm a F. florrerIApt. #307 'Durenberger for Senatei Political 19-20-78 ; 1.000.~

W I..A..f..........04...*kC'0-# I ....................................................

TOTAL tfk* Pe-Od Pw T$" -4 Yw Y4 04V ................... . .

..

.. . . . . . . . . .

V. IN"4-

~ =~L-'n- *~'- ,.. - .

am* %=Q .-.

ple Uf lexem

*L.i' cSUOVin9Lkw24.FECF;. 3)L.2.CP.

-~~ ~ ~ ational Republican Senatorial Corattee -E eniure

~ ~tbI~ 4 o, lair respective State Cosmittee0;~ rW" I" ku A*W ofdZTP to" too Wor CftWa 5%wo. Fewma"~ of Lzpew"~W4 r) f m~s ~

Tor Bnie Drenerer or Consulting 9-29-78 $3,000.00

8120 Penn Ave.rSouth MinnesotaMinneapolist Mn.

fT"' Ca~d#w- SFwlfteo.4mjVAd~= wdZIP Cor Nv" of FuVoVvW CwnC4ftsu.0po 1d t1.ce.w of F RVI~turl 081# lor- AIT. 10

at Eachw Osetisci" & Off-c So.%~ I v wNorthwestern Bell Durenberger for ITelephone 9-29-78 2,371.52Telephone Co. Senate Services1432 Soo Line Bldg. Minnesotai / [Minneapolis, MAn.

113 F&AI hWvn*.J..&is A400aan wd ZIP Co06 ~w'of .o."a Cwvtots Sucrtd ftnCVs..-S at F. as'O.:uwe C to V~ort A-.Osw

Paul Overgaard Durenberger for ;Consulting 19-29-78 4,500.00Suite f164 Sente-ervce8120 Penin Ave.,South MnnesotaMinneapolis, Mn.

fo _o- LIddnFt.,1 1ov V M&"~ ̂ 00""t &%a ZIP Coo. ka- wrof Pgr" CW'soWft.* swcooone. Paft e0 at I tpe01so~ Dow. tf'amrni I Ar'ousi:

at E'c% &tq 0f4fv doug. Is

Market Opinion Durenberger for Telephoning 9-29-78 8,850.00 ZPYResearch Senate Poll128 West Adams Minnesota IIDetroit* Michigaii

4822C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FuJ ft*-. A..ussq Aoorm &-d Z IP Coot.s hv" at Fso" o: Caftoscate Swoooe I". Paut-cw% of Eapr-&Otc Pa Deti t~'.afEc P~VV Sl.t,. D -%Trt & O'foct SOss9"I da ~I~

Christopher D. Lord IMartin for U. S. ;Consulting 9-29-7 8 20Q~5401 Westbard Ave. Senate *ServicesApt.#*1507 AlabamaBethesda, Md.

20016

TOA N ~t y h~40I@%I)..................................................................It r fe

7 -7L_% L4 -a -

-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P -Y~~~*.. -' .2 ~ZJ>...

I:%

.ozk ~ ~ ~ .~ L~ TIM:PL ..

r Al

-4-1. P- ___ 1--m .7 j

APPENDIX C

%,7 74

ZT.

t, I,- r. V41 !I

227 rrLML.-it

... ...

-- ~~V~ 4~jui44'

.z1 ic t2 .. 9'

. ~ ~ ~ . ................Jr ye A ClW'0 -I a ,,w ol&l Ap~rr' a~~' ooo nto

------------

to9

-- ---- ---

'~~~~ .' 4'ru'ro',;

OrtcT. Ai C~~~9 -,1,,-.-.

-1 17

44

.64,

10 7)% V. is . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .W", 7 1. . .Rol.'~

kv.0%.f C' -,. '--4

-ca 'o e. ........ ..

- -e;

1F.

T 2 : A M ~cm c v- m ' .. 1C.

S*b4%A pVAt)...... w............

rftIVOJ* A , *Wi 09Om) !.bfa~ 7-95e nad [email protected]' r, o~ta w.v..

. . .. . . . . . ..

................ . . ...1 .~ .

..~l ................s . .. . .1*,. .... ...

0 a.- V. --. at---

. . . . ,t w l; Sa sC 8 ...... .........A)........... .......................... ...............

. .- . . . . . .h.' O *t e . . . .. . . . . .......... _

Ic ) IU CA 0 6- "c' 1" n rerm -t~ fe'awd ... .c nj. n , a .. . .. .. .. .. .. ..

............h....A...............................

tesr 0, c t AI*i.idto t2 ff C o't

? e4-,- .

1t;, ts .' . 0 . ~ ad O . .. .m.et.. ) .. . 3 ,% 3.1 66 6

(j) ~ 09 ~ X P3.,2ZXI..JZ

go, r .. . . . . .~ .y .ota .oww ' . . S C . 4. .... ;....I.~~ ~ ~ ~ .i .. . ......... ........

.... ......

CCJ . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . .

h ms:A.eU To !46~'.... . . . . . . . . .... .... .... ....

. ... ... ... ... .tJ EX t D Y ............ .... ............

ofJE loom TarodF~ Toa tawensD. Frivad AFFIATEDOf COMTv~TE

22. rx~vts "01to Pi;1CSA 4~;7"%*~~~~~~~~~~~~~a 23 c.s4IpcrV'hfbo). . . .. . . .___________

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,7.. 4-rD n )........................... ......

J- o w " ccrw~l~v-4A lfvl- A OnZrhfS-A* (3109CAM l &,-'

i.- W-00-A~n4 f,1; w ..........ot). .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .I . .. .YJQJ ..~.~* .t .* .._ _ _ _ __.--.. -

'Ww4. E) . . It-...... ..... .

.................

77 ' 71 =_

- . ":LflS~f44W))- L -

' w W, "r-4~m k .' 0"I~~~~~~~~U :'Noa arwlej .tL1 V rIte -;1 N ~ i4t

-*aC2 .b* 24 E Fm3

5515tu Leit S S.4;Aposl "W on 1). to 2 0021 Ow *"&'~t*w

Sercaes ula a Citicsa e o Tyizn Services j I/7V4%b~n~r~, D C.2001

Iatol iect~dy Maye Durtmn r forS Semte o seda fodve irect Ff/21V3 5O,1cX c-

2030 2~ebe Ave.SuhIKSuhieo 0530 321

)'-w. iwid AA* Zaine Zmn19 4**

RuH oer, Ltd., VeMati for r.n S. Conto e dia Adv.rtisr..1n 10/3/70 1Fjoc/on..n

22 13 Ave. Str th~ e JreC: M Ycr)ll, ema 372r121

Av * NO i\- rinr.

S. ~ * 3

'- ~-

IT-~4

g &.stU (2 U, 91f C, %A& : .~t ft- % ~ -

U.$ FI *".3

1L.,tin a uap%: )L4

.C.'- 5831;ZOT1a1 C=Vdit" itirs___

X~~ri or . S ~ '~3ti~forU. . Soate Sct~o~441 '1 10/6/76 4 17 '

p. 0.ox Z4C A1ab ConLributiom

F UU. (T a -1 AA- A&O- &- :%I P A' ha.p 0 of C-o C .. 4 S-"V', I~~10 E apww% -0 Da L ii, C-" I'flU>LO.

bl P39 5a. 1'uiP.C ce So...;w d____ ay. vt

.7 oldr, ennedy. V~y e lfirtin for U. S. VsevateF

4020 list Ave, South 5'"

I ,'

-s p.attery Strect . ~ ~ 7u

0.,~:~~OC~ 94111,

.dc~c'..he. r. U.ip~~cyfor Smcte bu~n of

1Expenses 1'Ar~

4 top 10%.% Car"'4A'h9 SO

I P, CIlCE4 C:.-0O ~.COIO V~AI Ldlv) wa~ V-. ~

l~;-~ %4ven~isina Fricnd3 if ~r 'i?!e v tJi Al.dvert&!.,nr, 101:/o/ 2,)M. DO

..C;24 ItJe.at Third So Uw'*a ,.~w

taeIt Iowa r

A t&7.q.. .~.D . _.. __.__.. __.__..

.- - ......

'% I0~, ................

-7*nr-7'A-

j ~ SMuppufwq Line 2.3, F EC Form3

I~ bemdob oI-W4cmabmh ocos O-

M.%t1*Pvbf~c~ Seatril Couw~tt*- xendiiju __

o~ wnP~ i. ~k 040p" efW owol- 9z.o*,@ Soavtq __________ dwy.lft YES-

atkinD~on Advertising3 Okclahocian3 for !kiob Xaza Media d.l~a 10/111/7 V5C-;Associates Olahc LI5OaD N. Westerm.Su.t 101Aoklaboma City. Oklahiza

73118~ GJ~f Licon ~0tw a

____________________ lot If- c.'aajceI, - 3 _____ ________

Fa11 Nbafva .&.!Ag Ad&&n wa0 ZIP Ccc. hame' of Ftmqb' CA010-dato S.a4oo'ted. t FJI; -r a? Ea oc'ad.taae D a rgaS ti

DqI;c -0.C Sagh d1.Vio

Cor.?ammication Srecinli! ts. Texani, for Towler r~irect Kal 10117178 90,mooJlCP. 0. Bo 1529 1ServicesI

'0 Austin~, Tezas 78767

Full~ Ky".* ... ea ACrl &440 ZIP~ C"- ?h>*0 asb.C . .S~o~. Papt-co-'I!i a gm-tow a l ime no.'ft'*

Risth Jones, Ltd. Betll for SetiateI eiAvztsa10/97

123 E. 73.th Street I Cc-iitteeN Ne"i Ycrrk, N~ew Yo:k '10021 Iseiv jersey

7 A 0n c*i9~.j~V ~~ _ _ _

llolde=. Kenedyll Dy *it forU S. SntBell~m M edia tk.verzising ~1119/78 %0ck

2G20 21st Ave., fouthI'Iahile enn. 37412 *

Xerox Ca.orporati.onr1. 0. Pox 96300 .Clttcn fr1cy Off Ice Zq;uivew: 20'98 36.1rO

ChIAC35, 13XIuCLI 6C693 1 I1i-nots

T-1

~.............................................. .......

t4 ----------- ~~ a

-~ ~-A

r.0.. . .wo

I111 I I I I("IIOKN (,)N INISSION

November 6, 1978James Howard qtewart, Jr.3701 Knoliwood DriveAnniston, Alabama 36201

Dear Mr. Stewart:

This is to acknowledge receipt of yourcomplaint of November 3, 1978, alleging viola-tions of the Federal. Election Campaign laws.A staff member has been a-ssigned to analyze __your allegations. A reconmmendation to theFederal Election Commission as to how thismatter should be handled will be madeshortly. You will be notified as soon as theCommission determines what action should betaken. For your information, we have at-

a tached a brief description of the Commission'spreliminary procedures fo handling complaints.

rel, A~

Enclosurel

C,7

r "nLe~ter.-Scal

AssitantGeneal Cunse

U. S. SenateeIr3,17Office of the GeneralI CounselFederal Election Commission1325 K Street, N.W.Washington, D. C. 20463 807653Dear Sir:

The Friends of Donald Stewart Committee, a political committee supporting

C3 the candidacy of Donald Stewart for the United States Senate, files this complaint0 alleging that the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) has violated

K the party spending limitations contained in section 441a (d) of the Federal ElectionCampaign Act. In the current general election campaign for U. S. Senate in Alabama,NRSC has expended $194,700 on behalf of the Republican candidate Jim Martin,which is $69, 686.12 in excess of the limits under section 441a (d). This grossviolation of the law by NRSC, which has resulted in the expenditure of thousandsof illegal dollars in the Alabama Senate election, requires the Federal Election Commission'smost urgent attention.

C) According to published FEC calculations, the national and state committeesof a political party may each spend a maximum $62, 506.94 under section 441a (d)on behalf of a candidate for the United States Senate in Alabama. See AppendixA (with relevant figures underlined) attached to this complaint. Thus the RepublicanNational Committee and the Alabama Republican State Committee may spend no morethan a combined total of $125,013.88 on behalf of Jim Martin. Yet between September

N1, 1978 and October 19, 1978 the NRSC, acting as a designated agent of the nationaland state Republican committees, has spent $194,700 in expenditures on behalfof Mr. Martin -- $69,686.12 in excess of the legal limit. This violation is documentedby NRSC's own reports to the FEC, filed October 10 and October 28, where theseunlawful monies are recorded on Schedule F. */See appendix B and Appendix C,

*/Schedule F also confirms that the designated NRSC is proceeding onthe theory that it may act as the designated agent of both the RepublicanNational Committee and the Alabama Republican State Committee inmaking those 441a (d) expenditures.

P0. Box 2274Anniston, Alabamna 36201(205) 237-9311

2727 V2 Seventh Avenue SouthBirmingham, Alabama 35233(205) 252-5204 (205) 252-5064

Authorized and paid for by the Friends of Donald Stewart Corrmittee William Head. Dothan. Treasurer. PC) Box 2274, Annriston, Alabama 36201

Office of the General CounselFederal Election CommissionNovember 3, 1978page two

The Friends of Donald Stewart Committee further alleges that the Actdoes not authorize the NRSC to act as the designated agent of the Alabama RepublicanState Committee for the purpose of making section 441a (d) expenditures. Section110.7(a) (4) of the FEC's regulations, together with the FEC's own Advisory Opinion1976-108, make allowance only for an agency agreement under section 441a (d)between NRSC and the Republican National Committee, thereby enabling NRSC,as the agent for the National Committee, to spend a maximum $62, 506.94 on behalfof Mr. Martin. No legal grounds exist for a similar agency agreement betweenNRSC and the Alabama State Republican Committee -- but NRSC assumes nonethelessthat it may enter into such an agreement and spend an additional $62, 506. 94 onbehalf of Mr. Martin. If the Commission concurs with the Friends of Donald Stewartthat NRSC has misconstrued its authority under section 441a (d), and cannot act

%.0 as agent for the State Committee, then NRSC has exceeded the lawful limit under

?" that section by $132,193.06.

The party spending allowed for under section 441a (d) is substantial,and should have been sufficient to satisfy the NRSC. Instead this committee hasmade a mockery of the limit contained in section 441a (d); it has unleashed a flood

CI, of funds well in excess of the lawful limit, an action which expresses this committee'sdisregard of the law, and which undermines prospects for a fair election to theUnited States Senate in Alabama.

This complaint is filed by me on behalf of Donald Stewart's candidacyfor the United States Senate from Alabama.

Sincerely yours,

AMES HOWARD STEWART, JR.3701 Knollwood DriveAnniston, Alabama 36201Telephone Number (205) 236-5367

Campaign Chairman

Office of the General CounselFederal Election CommissionPage 3

STATE OF ALABAMA)

JEFFERSON COUNTY)

Before the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State ofAlabama at large, personally appeared JAMES HOWARD STEWART, JR.,who being known or made known to me and by me first duly sworn, onhis oath stated that the facts stated in the above and foregoing complaintsigned by him this day are true.

Given under my hand and seal this the_2j'cj day of November,1978.

Notary P blic

APPENDIX A

PARTY SPENDING LIMITS FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONTESTS

The Federal Election Commission has calculated the spending limitations for political

parties for congressionl candidates. The limits.-are effective for 1979. Back reference--

Law g1 140.

PARTY COORDINATED VAP 1978 Party

EXPENDITURE LIMITS - 1978 Stt tin5 thousads) Sedn iiain

Under the Federal Election Campint. asaedd Alabama 2,543 12569and the FEC regulations. there are special limits on expen. W---282.8,dituts made by political parties on behalf of Canidte i Alazoa 128,939the general election 42 U.S.C. §441aid). 11 CFR 110.7). Akna ,9 6725These special party extpeniditures count neither ascnrb- California 15,627 34. 111,66tions to the candidate not as expenditures by the candidate Colorado 1.828 ".,932.24

or the candidata~s authorized committees. The expenditures Coectcut 2.238 55.010.04

must. however, be reported by the party committee on Delaware* 407 24.580.00Schedule F, FEC Form' 3. revised January '1978.Ford62115830

Georgia 3,450 64.801.00

Hawaii 615 24.580.00

"dtonal political party committees have separate expendi. Idaho 574 24,580.00

ture limits for iSenate and House candidates in the general Illinois 7,873 193.518.34

election. Indiana 3.690 0.700.20Iowa 2.025 49,774.50

State political party committees &to entitled to separate Kansas 1.664 40.901.12

expenditure limits for Senate and House general election Kentucky 2,402 59,041.16

candidates in their State. Within a State, all expenditures Louisiana 2.609 64,129.22

!Ikmade on behalf of one candidate by the State party com. Maine 756 24,580.00

mittee or any subordinate party committee leg., county, Maryland 2,921 71,798.18

district, locallI are subject to one expenditure limit. Massachusetts 4,166 102,400.28

0Michigan 6,2814 154,460.72

The formulas for the party spending limits in 1978 are Minnesota 2,765 67.963.70

based on State voting age population estimates las of July Misissippi 1,575 38,713.50

1, 1977) from the Department of Commerce. and the Con- Missouri 3.417 83,989.86

sumer Price Index increase certified by the Secretary of Montana 523 24,58000

Labor. They are calculated as follows: -Nebraska 1.095 26,915.10Nevada' 439 24,580.00

Senatorial: New Hampshire 594 24,580.00

State Voting Age Population (VAP) x $0.02. plus the New Jersey 5,224 128,405.92

1978 increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) of New Mexico 783 24,580.00

0) 22.9 percent; or 524,580.00, whichever is greater. New Yor k 12,879 316,565.82

(See chart below.) North Carolina 3,864 94,977.12

7rNorth Dakota* 450 24,580.00

Cogesoa:Ohio 7,484 183,956.72

1) S1 2.290.00, for House candidatee in States with more Oklahoma 1.994 49.012.62

than one district (and candidates for Delegate from Oregon 1,695 41,663.10

the District of Columbia, Guam end the Virgin Pennsylvania 8,508 209,126.64

Islands; or for Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rhode Island 1673 24,580.00

Rico); or ... South Carolina 1,953 48,004.74

2) The Senate limit for the State, for House candidates South Dakota 475 24,580.00

fe4in States with only one district. (See chart below.) Tennessee 3,028 74.42L24Texas 8.773 215,640.34Utah 797 24,580.00Vermont' 336 24,580.00Virginia 3,631 89.249.98

PARTY SPENDING LIMITS Washington 2,589 83,637.62

FOR SENATE CANDIDATES .West Virginia 1,313 32.273.54

The Commission has compiled the following chart for Wisconsin 3,244 79,737.52

1978 limits on party spending for Senate candidates in the Wyoming . 278 24,580.00

genecal election. In the chart, an asterisk (*) indicates those

States having only one Representative. in these instances, District of

the Senate limit aipplies for these candidates instead of the Columbia 505 12,29.00

House limitation. This exception does not apply to candi. Guam 49 12,290.00

dates f or Delegate -(istrict of Columbia, Guam. Virgin Puerto Rico .. 2.010 12,290.00

Islands) or Resident Commissioner (Puerto Rico). Virgin Islands 59 12.290.00

APPENDIX B

"C lpffaaFORt A CAMOnMVU CR CXM ISIRU

NOMINATIO Of9t& CL-fl-" MomA~PCEt

- C.W tine a.I'WV fw Rabi I o' ~

Naional -Republican iaoil 01V .

%am* 0 cao C.,n of COMww,.tt1e s0 I.0 wllICe4t'Ce~m

227 Xassachustbtts Ave., N. Es ___________

£d~eng'efe ad ,,uOto" S0001r. State. Omw..es l69 apphgeoo

WahjtnD. C. 20002

C.1. State a-c ZIoo m okragh .t ad&@ f *tt am" an I%" g..* o o9I e d We of glea _______

4 VTve of PAoWt khcC eWObtv bo0e90

o Lw.. tO C"Alwtv RNP@'t

10t J 1 0 1OCb'tflv Regoet

*OC1wp. 10 t.wad'w.i RtOW*

o .av- s 31 A-'.a' P.Mot

o MoF%'Pr ~er?omant It

T". S 9

eo*c0 0 et.r.'vE

1o Tetti dt #WWI praeeg"~0

00s. %%& State at

Wattsae g

sotptett a

.c:.o. 0C,.W.Va I.c1*10 P''

o Am"1m0"Tsw

o 0PP 4e a.. 04". ec

SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND ExPENDITURESIF*~vi mW 6e 9016014 t10 -0011 .0-

Calvirro A Ce~

5 Coverong Vq..d july L..L.... YSSA t fbxL_30, 1978 Trim Permed * Caae w.1'

* ~ C~'~ ~s 970,588.96

S~~~~~~~ 2.t..~ 50.e1 ,6.1,974.14 S 3,12,563. 10

Aa-- ..nft 7 &ail ew.c Cogwmn A &via eW"G6 'Of * Coh..0S S _ %2.612,563.10 SW9429-631

~ e~ ~1.200,000.00 S 2,000,000.00

toc.,~~~* *aS Sl412 5 6 3 .10 1 1,0412A563.1 -p

12 e. ts J b iS ~at~t coc * .. 0 te!W Co.-j.ttc. C~daa.o tat?" IV 3 OF, &"W.3.61 C t75QO

I ceCI tlla t1 have e1IdImIn90 te; Rtpoet and to t'oe oent c my Ekno*'091g and *09?.9 Af tue. Cal'CT and COM ONI

Gc..QA98.dy A. Smeh. Irpmauex- UtrE-

Mate mm %am* co Tro"e. 0. Cano-date, *s~vame. Tea%~e W. caeme.det

0. sect on 4jJS It -me f~w stare @0 fav-

For "jehe# ft&,'1 6lousan C-.iA.AWCG oC

1325 K~ Street. t A a C10. O429U0 6 1670 0110504

Cotat:Va,Vngt. D C 20463 5 .. te 3 -1 -8 1

) All previous vermosi~ of F EC FORM 3 are obsolete and should no toger be used.

A or 00F'mt- OfP@'70d ARMAD' MAPe ftt be 90040 pip soat Umw b' tyr pwion Par ea~"$ O me*ppig caog'.wro' se few amp cI5mteeao DW'PP

I I-4

a m

W

W .

10ft4h fowls

a .

11~~; ~ -

v 4

v ID mC*~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 738.201.30 1opakJl T'etme

SO-QW.,ta .10.063.64MM 1

L41S WO 9"W"I 0" rSi So

%doSkmervab *I g01p.SAwI.@p "p

"91601 as~.I~4 .~ge.6m~l &PSW'ntl 01 Ssw

441 ~ A &fwmti~

Obs Ue0"es

k* I ffM ot p* OFI9'. A

AAA e.'ste at low"~%

it. TOWL w

- -. I , ,ti812.32

~ 47,263.57 I"&46300o9lS * £ 46 30091

S 1.6.300-91

S

S

S 144.52 1820

S

S.

WbU~ ..

lC I. k'ISI"

Do oans, S MOOUUa"

To Y 9MOUG.lltw t "ui an0 ~''m S .9V 1 a9 po@ 's" S 1 2 0 0 0 0

se :arb e " 4 W P " 0 l 0 01 S 1 200 9.000 .0 2 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 -00

ow1. a^ S0W4 ,"

39& TOWSadU W~. .... 55WIS ...

21. C. a 1l m li w se 291 5XI

OT R

1.vSI' wwl 19u0"1Sss 225*11.

NL T OPss INA W W'LM E' To ,,~ AND. FR MA PL A IDCI~ s

\

"C.Onvv.21. Loans. LOW 5109"- *4L.Wed 0 Si

IL

POWTCAL PAIT Im~ @ 9nD4.*q E

on mom"P OP CA= IS.U P WEAL OP r.62 UZ4416d)) POP &Am*. PIUC Fwft 3

-1,..v-, o UP SRLIA.24. FEC FeuI3) ~~

.- N16-jQV .-- I" 9cti~ State Cmaitteea ,

Fulla 040. &*"~ AiWM od ZIP Camt %Wft*1-F~ftW Candk ofIemw

Daniels &Aasociates, Inc.400 Office Park Drive Martin for U.S. Senate Media AdvertisinBirmiugha., Alabama 35223 Alabaca Programing 9-1-78 251,000.0 '

R. J. Sanm I Associates Kansans for Kassebaum Media Adwetsing 9-1-78 20,000.0630 - 9th, Avenue KansasINew York, Now York 10030

4"m -"-4.~f"Fi..i &W0me, A *ea e" *Ad ZIP cown hoto e" wi Skews. Ptnwws~@ -~---

Monarchs Printing; Corp. Ciies o ercy1130 West Adams Street Illinois Printing services *9-5-78 21,649.00Chicago. Illinois 60607

kaW., 40 .. Fee" Cn* ww d minmueu@ w

Romanek Golub & Company ItesfrPrc I Monthly rent forI

8 South Mchigan Ave. Illinois ofiesae I--81475625 N. iciftan Ave.oficspc9-78 , 1474Chicago. Illinois 6061

Agq'~st Gam su. 1E..af £Sp"goatw-9

FuS wi 4v". Me~. 0 n 014 A ZIP CA kow "1 of ~ Cw"%KIdun io"Ontea. ow t-cww% of l &.seft"0 DleV"%uof Eqch 00,o t Sce. awotew Otfow SouegPf

Bailey. Deardourff & 1Associates ICitizens for Percy Media Advertising 1 9-5-78 10,000.00 -.

Suite #1120 1Illinois733 - 25thSt.jN. W. I

Wiasington, D. Co.

SUSTOTAL Of *XI&W t5 POV IpOMAOa.......................................... ................... sTOTAL tfto off* (Lose p V" lift -4 tw ........................................................... .

. -~ t -7.

- -m*

+.-- -

-v~.

~ -

cmWBALF OFP URLC4

Csappor*1 Line 24. FEC Fam 3)

fro b d # aftW ewat s owd nd

Watiml RepubUcan Senatorial CmteRP@nituWOs

"VEadw00 9Wdd4 1 "I Rep~ublican Nationsl r.eie- __t teP'is kems. he dro &eWe~ ZIP COO hwft of Pfra C00148 Dwesise.l

Daulae & Associates Martin for U.S.Senate Media Advertising 9-19-78 2.50000.L 402 Office Park Drive AlabamaSuite #110Birmiugban. Alabama

35223

F ull mde. U1.fAO&g We w ZIV Go" ham* ofFwl Qr48 Cae porw P6011..I., ol isocodiw Jane .mwn. wtw

of Each P.,.. State. Doestia A 00ole 5OW0u ______________

WorthUes lTeehn Durenberger for Senate ITelephone service 9- 19-78 3050004

1432 So* line Building Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota

for "ai C..66n.e - S___________

FWl NYwo. Wo..ng ^drm a" ZIP can hd e o"few UAroaomte su.',vw4 Pe.uIf 14wso~t "WO owl Dtr~nh ^.00V

of Each Pewm S~e. Drniaiet A Of It Sow001 t 'a. Vows

Shsenfo eaeDon Shasteen Sec. 441

820 South 13th Stree U.S. Senate Contribution -078 6000

Lincoln, Nebraska j80 Nebraska

-fors 2 YN i LCA'. LAe.4'wu

Pu ,.ea rw

Greenbriat Apartmeat& Durenberger for Senate Political 9-20-78 j 1350.

10401 S, Cedar take Rd. Minnesota Consulting

Minnetonka,, Minnesota55343

- c ".6 -oact - sa gnm

Put' hem Met.vt ands Z IP C409Of Each tee aw. ""tm - .. W V-

Thmo5 F. HornerApt. #3076300 York Ave., SouthEdina, Minnesota 55435

Durenberger for SenateMinne sot a

PoliticalConsulting

1 as. Vw)i9-20-78'

f ew "-Ia Cam-dat - S I

w w" T L o ... ... .... ... .... ....... ...

C,

1,000.

li'm

wX-001M.a- rue e- fte I

IP! 'V. z r

* P~COOE PZAL OFC~~S__& f 2 U=441aW)) 6.24'-

C-C - Supets U24. FEC Form 33

National Republican Senatorial Committe ExpendituresLo coiwos 08e Q.P

CK

g4.

Tora Horner Durenberger for Consulting 9-29-78 $3,000.00Suit #14 SeateServices

Telephonefe Co. Seate - Sevce

1432 Soo Line Bldg. MinnesotaMinneapolis, Mn. I55402 J_________

FWuI NaI &44 Me.Irei end ZIPI C0" 0w Ioof lue CONo.w 5'~~ Vvts"i.Ior ofamEu~tv w 04mo VI Alot Emcb Pm,.. Lue. Onvm a Offe 'mot~ day. ,'o

Paul Overgaard Durenberger for Csutg 19-29-78 4g500.00Suite #164 1Senate Services8120 Penn Ave.,South fMinnesotaMinneapolis, Mn.

.55431 J___________

for III cWtIOP - SIFoul NVI Mebs" Ad*t a" ZIP COO* kvne of Fedowl Coow ome. PVIICtaI of . OW1Gm Dow 1~to* j Amount

of Eso~ Pyw Sun. Du&w' & Oftef... c Soug't ~I__

market Opinion Durenberger for "Telephoning 19-29-78 8,850.00Research Senate IPollI

28 West Adamsa MinnesotaDetroit, Mihia

foe T"i Caendo - SPu1 ts- Nv ". &.ng h er f s ZIP Coow & kvmq of F~osv Canosoas Swcowtoo. Patjcuwt of F apasabsu D ate bnn.

at Each Pm,, I Store. Dawetf & Offos SouU't dew. WI

Christopher D. Lord Martin for u. s. ;',Consulting 9-29-78 200.005401 Westbard Ave. Senate ServicesApt. #1507 fAlabamaBethesda, Md.

20016 w Ite

for t". CanIdat.-S

U M F V A L of aoo ~ fv w ~w4 P W 400 ,6 1 .............................. ......:1 :i

APPENDIX C

d~~~~~j~ Vu- '-,~. . , ,

A10~ AAmrrcctbr1 ~t:~~ g

~'U" ~ , f.' ~ I) pw i"~a -~ Ail~

7e~.i -CmI~,hb 5b~ai~. t~.F~rj~ N

2 ~ 5m.At

1... oo&*C---60 _____________

CA4%C.

. ................... ...

Type~~~~j Moo Pegos

0cm4 saw* ~II 1.b

~1 rses'dee .pt e~roT~m.Gr4

O~~~~~~~~~~~lf sodt 44DVRPI

fAV.giWC o~nI~~)~ ~ ~

wow ~ ~~~~ WOW~F .00............

o ~ ~~D C_,bb 10 .Ke"e

YCC

~-AAC.It. AJ

N"Nbft folio- "

5.Edtjdt0A~w~5

P...................................... &%3 LO

S.. Sbw MA'a ISSWEIT NDPrN0TR

of. 44

~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . "4 c~ d

.rMrd Ppo 0 b% iLrWJ~f~ Q~I ~ *,' 4 r~4% ''.

.. .. . .. .3r4 Mg03'~."e~ d'.

7 of T

'

...........

,.4 .lp WW -A. , .

* - -

_:;.;R li' vow~--- -- ~~ - -6-

plat LM.Jsmt.* S~p8tlt81 Ct 50"tO'S UAC Tck

Thblow" Cab -vw Y ^

twomim~4, ..od a D.V

............ ......)........ ......

to ~t'" ~ ~ nadCib.~ 160410d ton psbi'dw A~n ~ ,.. Q

..........................

*clej A ))JS*Se"IofVI)..... ..................... ...............

Ido~mto Svbt4.'d fro 0oi" em"WS . . a_

..... .. ....................................... ....... ..

'-I 5. o 03 stu'Ci ..bI.,ue034o.. ..................... ... L

1 tto.'.d low SovowA ) B).................................. ... ........ ...

.................. ............. ... . ___

is Ls. L& p~Ft1 106W of C99mism:;9'Ffa" A~

.... ....... . ... ... ..

...............wn4'(he... 0 S9'mb p 9...u..... ......

22 >~.2mdA ~e. £4 i@4 j..............................

2ZTZZ...................tovv~....nAoty"o.... bn~iw.......... Mof........................ ...............

.............. ...........

ZX obI I Io~ wa.................................................. ~ .~&

.?-~P . . . .. .. .. .. .. .................

Sonownt),~~~~-~ .* .___ .......

PEE

5

C

-'

'V * -. .. p -~ -p..,. r

- ' CAM

'y

- L

rp A. P

4-mw wz* a*_

&No"iagon D. C." 20021 w ..

oainl it g aih Postag fo dirrvotAumaedBuias Hll Ciiensege for Sehrn TpigSeeie 10/2/78 1W97

Wasbistho , DC.2001

of fabd p"". bm*. DIige Oflsm Spio ___________

Natoldar Diectdy Hale ?'.refn are forS Senate Postagfo Advertis 10/2178 5,0,C CG ~M Sell~ Mibnnoa ralsrl2020 21s Ave.Sot

behvelda. Maynd322.

________O_______ to, 1., COM146t - S

DE*0s & Postage saHuode Kennfedy Daie rlt fo~r V. . Snte 10~ deriigI/2178 Z'.

515 Lvile Ten. 37212. enese

W~~shogto# Oti C. %S0021 S

Aut oated Buin.ss ell forlc Seae Co=Itte Potag erts 1013178 ~ cNWpsbno, De. C.r 0021

f&,~- t%4 --nd O -

Z= c3602ALPOP C* E C 7 SP " F MRAL ~'

ubli 1~stouJX ar4 or rA.SPective St*~teC-uit*

Otto*r da. ~Hanfl orU. S. Seae Martin for tY. S. Senate S*CtioDn i. 441fl

"IOU~)

P. 0. Dox 3406. Alabama Contribution

~ 202021st ve., 35205

isg~ CAv.6&t - S

COOFaxciC.Ca 41

od'. Kenedy Dy 8r Mrin~h~ for S.enate 1

Nsvle. Ten 37212.D''~ ae o..f

Lr1

Voodwar!Jt Aaveil j Fzpriedy fo er eve Med[a Mdvrttzsin 110178~ 4Gr $)-0

Asc ia W'te Thr tr e ev i Ha p h r

lie

22 Batery tree

low ~ ~ wh' .-wft~ --

I

!,.1 r

(Supu~gLim 24. FEC Form3

IT b N& VorbpPWW"CWftb *"w,§W~

pu500a N.loa 1JeteuSdt RepetveStt "

Oklahoma City, Ok.1ahow~

-~ F~ WN."s. Maw! 6g Ad&"%p 0- Z IP COO# %P4 of F000181 Con't4 S aopo'ed. ~ ~ ~i'.&@ O~ ~,t, ~~.of~sa, fact&'P~ct & 4fce Sighvow

C*uiainSeils& Texans for Tlower iretHl10178 90,0D"

SAustin~, Texas 78767

Full Kntr* M..5.. Acerb. a Z: C0o. of~ .9Ftevs CA'Ota-al 3S40&@o104. Gate~ i' pOAhw' ''at?,. 3

Staet a' ~lte. D.,t'c & 0'?'Co SOWvV'I cow . Veau3

":.' Rth Jones, L~td. Bell for Senate Mei detsu 1/97 'o'0

123 E. 75th Street Co-Atte&

Newu York, N~ew York 10021 Noev Jersey

SC

Fe ae*Molote A4'.iaSO Z i Co". ka-me' of Po.'.'O Candc.)O0 ljDoo'9ed.. SP.'' 9(g~~S* *"~'. AQ

F ' tEahPy Slate. Dilf-cl & Of9c !.c VVW

W Uolder, Kenoedyo Dye 6 Martin for V. So Senate

bell Alabme~a i Media Advertising 110119178 oo50 l0

2020 21st Ave., FouthN lashville, Tenrn. 37212 _ __ $' '2

F 1. Name.. WS-'"; &001"1 &1%0 ZIo CoI rach Paw# I 9 S IDI&. D CSif r h ..C

Xerox Corporation 1ec 0feE~inr

0. Box 96300 Citizens for Pery f 9fl8261,

Chicago, 1llincis 60693 'Illinois

- A

4- LaOTALv~ Ite.........~ ....

La~p

* in-gjv, -''..-,', ~ ' ~ 9 ~ * .

U

I-7I U ' _ _ _ _

If'

Office of the General CounselFederal Election Commission132SK Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20463

.4

~

4

I LULRAL LLLCJIION COMMISSIONI Qf) K SI RIt I N WVVASIIIN(,ION()C. 20461

THIS IS THE BEGINiI'W'G OF fIUR #

Date Filmed 8/9

Cameraman

Camera No. -- 2

c,::;

Ag O

e~I~* .*IJ

~lb

-- fa 10 - FEC

Documents

Transcript of -- fa 10 - FEC