Sesi 6 -Sales Evaluation(1)
-
Upload
indra-pramana -
Category
Documents
-
view
45 -
download
0
Transcript of Sesi 6 -Sales Evaluation(1)
PENILAIAN PRESTASI KERJA (KINERJA) WIRANIAGA
Penilaian Prestasi Kerja :
“Sebuah sistem formal untuk memeriksa/mengkaji dan mengevaluasi unjuk kerja (kinerja) seseorang secara berkala”
Tujuan : Sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan untuk :
a. mempromosikan pekerja yang berprestasi
b. menindak pekerja yang kurang berprestasi
c. melatih, memutasikan atau mendisiplinkan pekerja
d. memberikan dan menunda kenaikan imbalan Memberikan umpan balik kepada para karyawan, sehingga penilaian
kinerja dapat berfungsi sebagai wahana pengembangan pribadi dan pengembangan karir
Bila kebutuhan pengembangan pekerja dapat diidentifikasikan, maka prestasi kerja dapat membantu untuk menentukan tujuan program pelatihan
ASPEK-ASPEK YANG DIEVALUASI DARI KINERJA KARYAWAN Evaluasi Formal Kinerja
Dilakukan dengan melihat laporan penjualan.Indikator kunci untuk menilai kinerja penjualan :- jumlah rata-rata penjualan/hari- waktu kunjungan- pendapatan rata-rata/kunjungan- biaya rata-rata/kunjungan- jumlah pelanggan baru- jumlah pelanggan yang hilang
Evaluasi Kepuasan Pelanggan Evaluasi Kualitatif Wiraniaga
Steps in the Development of a Sales Evaluation Program
Planning Managing
Make a detailed
study of the sales job
Write the job description
Establish performance
standards
Evaluate and determine reasons for
salespeople’s performance
above or below
standards
Take action for
improvement
SALES EVALUATION PRINCIPLES1. Realistic
It must reflect territories, competition, experience, sales potential and so forth as they trully are
2. Continous, known, expectedIt must show a salesperson when and how work is evaluated
3. Constructive, not destructive It must show a salesperson what needs improvement and how to improve sales performance
4. MotivatingIt must stimulate a salesperson to improve
5. InformativeIt must provide useful information about a salesperson and the territory for management
6. ParticipatoryIt must involve salespersons in their own evaluation
7. Objective, not subjectiveIt must be based on standards, not on opinions or prejudices
8. FlexibleIt must be adapteble to changing market condition
9. SpecificIt must fit the company and the sales force involved
10. EconomicalIt must be worthwhile in terms of money and time
SPECIFIC MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE
Include two types :
1. The salesperson’s effort, or input
Will show what they did
2. The salesperson’s results or output
Will tell how they didTable 6-1
Input Measures of Sales Activities
STANDARD ACTIVITY MEASURED
Calls per day Time utilization, application
Nonselling activities (public relations, etc)
Application to job, planning ability
Correspondence, phone calls made
Application to job, selling ability
Management of time Business ability, efficiency, attitude toward job
Product, policy, and procedure knowledge
attitude toward company and job, selling ability
Table 6-2Output Measures of Sales Results
STANDARD RESULT MEASURED
Dollar of unit sales volume Dollar or unit “score”
Number of orders written Volume of business , frequency of order taken
Number of reorders Frequency of repeat business, customer loyalty, selling skill
Number of active accounts Territory coverage, potential
METHODS OF SALES FORCE EVALUATION
Ranking
Evaluation method in which all salespeople are listed in order of their performance Rating Scales
Evaluation method in which behavior factors and performance criteria are established and salespeople are evaluated on the extent to which they meet the criteria
Essays
Evaluation method in which sales managers write brief narratives that describe the performance of salespeople
BARS (Behaviorally anchored rating scale)
A five step process used to evaluate sales personnel :
1. Description of specific critical incidents of effective an ineffective sales performance behavior
2. Reviewed and refined into a smaller set of performance dimensions
3. Have another group of sales personnel review the performance dimensions
4. Asked to rate the critical incidents on a 1 to 10 point scale
5. The emergence of the behaviorally anchored rating scales for the set of dimensions that remain