lingkungan bisnis.docx

download lingkungan bisnis.docx

of 4

Transcript of lingkungan bisnis.docx

  • 8/12/2019 lingkungan bisnis.docx

    1/4

    Standar Global Audit Sosial

    Sejumlah organisasi telah mengembangkan standar untuk menilai kinerja perusahaan. Termasuk

    International Organisation for Standards (ISO 14001, 14063, dan 26000), Global Reporting Initiative,

    Social Accountability 8000, the Institute of social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA), AccountAbility

    (AA 1000), dan pedoman yang di publikasikan oleh United Nations Global Compact.

    Ringkasan Standar Global Audit Sosial

    ISO 14001 Global Reporting

    Initiative

    SA 8000

    Sumber 1996 1997 1997

    Ruang Lingkup Standar Pengelolaan

    Lingkungan

    Kinerja Ekonomi,

    lingkungan, dan Sosial

    Meningkatkan kondisi

    tenaga kerja dan

    pelaporan publik

    Tata Kelola Dewan ISO, dewan

    pengurus dan komiteteknis

    Dewan pengurus

    pemangku kepentingan,penasihat teknis

    SAI, organisasi non

    pemerintahan, serikatburuh

    Anggota Negara anggota ISO,

    lingkungan organisasi

    non pemerintahan.

    Lingkungan perusahaan,

    hak asasi manusia,

    kelompok buruh, asosiasi

    industri, pemerintahan

    Perusahaan dan pemasok,

    asosiasi perdagangan,

    lingkungan pemerintah

    dan lingkungan organisasi

    non pemerintahan

    Sumber Dana Iuran anggota ISO,

    penjualan dokumen,

    relawan

    Yayasan, perusahaan,

    pemerintah

    Yayasan, hibah,

    pendapatan dari kegiatan

    dan jasa

    ISEAA AA 1000 United Nation

    Global Compact

    ISO 14063 ISO 26000

    Sumber 1999 1999 2001 Target

    pelaksanaan:

    2010

    Ruang Lingkup Etika akuntansi,

    audit, dan

    pelaporan

    Prinsip operasi

    perusahaan, hak

    asasi manusia,

    tenaga kerja.

    Panduan

    komunikasi

    lingkungan

    Standar tanggung

    jawab sosial

    Tata Kelola ISEA, anggota

    bisnis, organisasinirlaba, akademis,

    konsultan

    Kelompok

    pemangkukepentingan,

    masalah jaringan

    global.

    Komite teknis ISO,

    kelompok kerja

    Pengurus teknis

    ISO, kelompokkerja

    Anggota Anggota

    pemangku

    kepentingan

    Perusahaan,

    organisasi tenaga

    kerja, organisasi

    non pemerintah

    Negata anggota

    ISO, perusahaan,

    organisasi non

    pemerintah,

    konsultan,

    Negara anggota

    ISO, sektor publik

    dan swasta

    Sumber Dana Pendapatan

    keanggotaan,

    riset, yayasan

    Yayasan dan

    pemerintah

    Iuran anggota

    ISO, penjualan

    dokumen,relawan

    Iuran anggota

    ISO, penjualan

    dokumen,relawan

  • 8/12/2019 lingkungan bisnis.docx

    2/4

    Setiap standar berkonsentrasi pada kombinasi manfaat ekonomi yang difokukan secara internal bagi

    perusahaan, dan secara eksternal berfokus pada manfaat sosial bagi lingkungan dan pemangku

    kepentingan. Banyak perusahaan yang berkomitmen untuk menerapkan standar dan telah membuat

    laporan mereka secara online bagi para pemangku kepentingan mereka dan masyarakat umum.

    Beberapa perusahaan telah memasukkan standar ke dalam rencana strategis mereka, dan

    pemangku kepentingan mengharapkan perusahaan untuk mematuhi standar-standar global.

    Pelaporan Sosial dan Lingkungan

    Selain melakukan pengukuran kinerja sosial yang luas, beberapa organisasi telah melakukan

    tindakan tambahan pelaporan usaha mereka melalui laporan sosial perusahaan. Seperti yang

    dilaporkan dalam sebuah survei internasional tentang tanggung jawab perusahaan pada tahun 2008.

    laporan tersebut menyatakan bahwa pelaporan tanggung jawab perusahaan telah terus meningkat

    sejak tahun 1993 dan telah meningkat secara substansial dalam enam tahun terakhir sejak tahun2002.

    Scan gambar

    ketika kita melihat pelaporan sosial dari berbagai negara, Jepang dan Inggris termasuk kedalam

    daftar paling. Namun, peningkatan terbesar dalam pelaporan 2005-2008 yang sejak tahun 1993 dan

    telah meningkat secara substansial dalam enam tahun terakhir sejak tahun 2002.

    when we look at social reporting by country, Japan and the United Kingdom top the list of

    percentage of firms reporting. however, the largest increases in reporting from 2005 to 2008 were

    seen in the United State and in Europe, where Spain, the Netherlands, and italy all showed dramatic

    increases, attributed to increased government insistence on reporting as mentioned earlier. In Spain

    63 percent of firm now have social report (up from 25 percent), in the Netherlands reporting

    increased to 63 percent (up from 29 percent) and in Italy the percentage of firms reporting was 59

    percent (up from 31 percent in 2005).

    in another study undertaken by the Social Investment Research Analysts Network (SIRAN) in 2006,

    79 companies from the Standard and Poor's (S&P) 100 index had Special sections of their websites

    dedicated to sharing information about their social and environmental policies and performance.

    Over one-third reported that their reports were based on the Global Reporting Initiative

    Sustainability Reporting guideline. Forty-three companies in the S&P Index issued corporate social

    responsibility reports, up from 39 percent in 2005.

    According to one study, most firms are motivated by ethical concerns when publishing their socialresponsibility reports. Ethical drivers replaced economic considerations as the primary motivator for

  • 8/12/2019 lingkungan bisnis.docx

    3/4

    publishing these reports, a complete reverse from a view years ago when economic considerations

    were viewed as the most important.

    Balance Scorecard

    In addition to formal social responsibility reports, organizations have turned to other social reporting

    methods to communicate with their stakeholder. Balance scorecard is a focused set of key financial

    and nonfinancial indicators, with four quadrants or perspectives: internal business processes,

    learning and growth, customer, and financial. Balance in this case, does not necessarily mean

    equal; rather, it is a tool to encourage managers to develop and use performance metrics that cover

    all aspect of performance.

    Traditional financial measures are necessary, but no longer sufficient, indicators of business success.

    Financial measures tell the story of past events, an adequate story for industrial-age companies for

    which investments in longterm capabilities and customer relation were not critical for success. These

    measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age

    companies must take to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees,

    processes, technology, and innovation.

    Organizations report several motivations for adopting a balanced scorecard approach. These include

    economic considerations, ethical considerations, innovation and learning, employee motivation, risk

    management or risk reduction, access to capital or increased shareholder value, reputation or brand,

    market position or share, strengthened supplier relationship, and cost saving. Four primary reason

    were citied for adopting balance scorecard: the need to track progress toward achieving

    organizational goals, the need to align employee behavior with an organizations strategic objectives,

    the need to communicate strategy to everyone in a clear and simple manner, and the need to

    measure performance at different level in an organization strategies.

    Triple Bottom Line

    Another approach to reporting corporate social performance is captured by the term triple bottom

    line. Bottom line refers, of course, to the figure at the end of a company financial statement that

    summarizes its earnings, after expenses. Triple bottom line reporting occurs when companies reportto stareholders not just their financial resultsas in the traditional annual report to shareholders

    but also their environmental and social impacts. Financial, social, and environmental result, taken

    together as an integrated whole, constitute a companys triple bottom line.

    As in the trend toward social reporting, firm in Europe have more quickly accepted triple bottom line

    than hace those in the United State. European executives have seized on this notion as both a

    proactive way to provide stakeholders with increase transparency and a broader framework for

    decision making.

    Businesses have recognized, either through adherence to their value and mission or from externally

    imposed pressures, that stakeholders demand greater transparencythat is, clear public reporting

  • 8/12/2019 lingkungan bisnis.docx

    4/4

    of an organizations performance to various stakeholders, and full reporting of not only financial but

    also social and environmental data. As firms accept the importance of stakeholders in their quest for

    financial viability, companies have discovered and welcomed new approaches for disclosure of

    information such as social auditing, us of the balance scorecard, and triple bottom line reporting.