Agung Indrajit

Ph.D StudentFaculty of Architecture & Built Environment

Pemindahan Ibukota:Dari Daendels sampai Jokowi

• Bandung

• Surabaya

• Bandung

• Malang,

• Palangka Raya

• Surabaya,

• Surakarta,

• Temanggung

• Magelang,

• Bogor

• Jonggol

• Jonggol

• Sukabumi

• Purwakarta

• Balikpapan

• Mamuju

• Penajam Paser

Utara

• Palangka Raya

• Tanah Bumbu

• Jonggol

Development Plans/Spatial

Plans - KalimantanPolicy direction:

• Maintain Kalimantan’s

function as lungs of the

world by 1) enhancing

conservation and

rehabilitation of watershed,

2) preventing land critical,

protected forest, production

forest and 3) developing

flood and forest fires system

• Develop downstream

industry of coal and new

renewable energy source

(biomass, solar, etc) industry

• Develop oil palm, rubber,

bauxite, iron, natural gas,

zircon sand and quartz

sand industry

• Develop agricultural

sector/sub-sector to realize

Kalimantan as the national

granary

PKN TARAKAN

KEK MALOY-BATUTA

PKN BALIKPAPAN, TENGGARONG,

SAMARINDA, BONTANGSASAMBA AREA

DAS KAKAB AREA

BATULICIN AREA

BATULICIN INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

JORONG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

PKN BANJARMASIN

PKN PALANGKARAYA

KHATULISTIWA AREA

LANDAK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

PKN PONTIANAK

KETAPANG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

KotaDefinisi:Area terbangun dengan struktur jalan dan suatu permukiman yang terpusat padasuatu area terbangun dengan kepadatan tertentu yang membutuhkan sarana danpelayanan pendukung yang lebih lengkap dibandingkan dengan kebutuhan dipedesaan (Branch)

Keunggulan Komparatif (Alamiah): Landscape, historis, jaminan kelangsungan hidup, dan sumberdaya alam.Keunggulan Komparatif (Buatan): Aksesibilitas tinggi dan sarana dan prasarananya.

Kriteria Untuk Washington DC (Brooking Institute): Local identity, Quality Transportation, Clean Environment, Quality Education, Public safety, Quality Housing, Healthy residents, Stable communities, Quality Downtown, Open public spaces, Historic & Cultural resources, Vibrant Neighborhoods.

Urban Challenges

Minimum Urban Service Standards

Poverty, social and criminals in

big cities

Low quality and productivity of human

resources, socialcapital and

underutilized socio-cultural

Limited financial resources for

financing urban development

Sectoral Oriented Regulation vs

Integrated approach in city as a region

City governance, quality and capacity of human

resource apparatus, community, professional and private participation

Uncontrolled spatial planning and environment management

Low competitiveness,

less developed local economy

POTENCY OF GEOGRAPHICAL

SOCIO-CULTURAL

GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS

INCLUSIVE, RESILIENT AND SUSTAINABLE

Excellent Dumb City vs Smart City?

Smart Capital City?

Technology

Organization Policy

Smart

Governance

Smart

Environment

Smart

Living

Smart

Mobility

Smart

Economy

Smart

City

Smart

People

(Chourabi et al 2012)

NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2015-2045:THE NATIONAL CONCEPT

Green

and Resilient City

Green Openspace

Green Transportation

Green Energy

Green Building

Green Water

Green Waste

Smart and

Competitive City

Smart Economy

Smart People

Smart Governance

Smart Infrastructure

Smart Environment

Smart Living

Livable, Safe, and

Convenient City

Strong Neighboorhoods

Walkable

Affordable

Connectivity

Comfortable

Cultural

Development of Cities with Indonesian Identity based on its geographical and socio culture

Development linkages between cities and between urban and rural

area in National Urban System based on regional clusters

FUTURE INDONESIAN CITIES 2045 :

SUSTAINABLE AND COMPETITIVE CITIESPILLAR 1 PILLAR 2 PILLAR 3

PILLAR 4 PILLAR 5

NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2015-2045:THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN

20352015 20452025

Linkages between cities and urban-rural areas within National Urban System3

2

100% indicators for GREEN CITIES

achieved for all cities

100% indicators

achieved for

SMART AND

COMPETITIVE

CITIES achieved

for all cities

SUSTAINABLE CITIES

1Path to The Future Cities

Baseline

Long Term Development Plan2015-2025

Long Term Development Plan

2025-2045

100% indicators for urban governance achieved for all cities

Fulfillment of Urban Services Standards

(SPP) as well as LIVABLE CITIES

Fulfillment of Urban Services

NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2015-2045:THE NATIONAL STRATEGY

Component 3

Pilot Project of Sustainable

City and New Towns

(Infrastructures Investment)

IV. To develop green and resilient city

VI. Urban development governance

Governance

V. To develop smart and competitive city

Urban Website

1. KSPPN & RPJMN: POLICY AND REGULATION

2. IKB: MONEV INSTRUMENT

3. NUDP: PROGRAMMING

4. DATA & CITY INFO

Component 1 :

The preparation of policy,

institutional, and urban

financing in the National Level

Component 2 :

Technical Assistance to

Local Governments

II. To Accelerate urban service standart

I. Implementation of National Urban System

Urban

ServiceSocial

CultureEconomyEnvironment

Urban

System

III. To develop liveable city

City MapData

ApplicationCity

Profile

Instrument

Survey

FUTURE SUSTAINABLE CITY 2045

Urban Bulletin

Information will drive (and limit) you!

National Land Agency Local Governments

(Enemark 2001 and Enemark et al. 2014 )

Holistic-Integrated-Thematic-Spatial

Kepo from Delft

Kebijakan Satu Peta

Kebijakan Satu Data

Nyinyir from Delft

(Indrajit et al. 2019)

Excellent Smart and Sustainable Capitol City