05/10/2014 - Johannessimatupang's Weblog penciptaan barang dan jasa Operations management (O M) ......
-
Upload
vuongkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
5
Transcript of 05/10/2014 - Johannessimatupang's Weblog penciptaan barang dan jasa Operations management (O M) ......
05/10/2014
1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 1
penjelasan SeminarAkademis dan Presentasipenjelasan SeminarAkademis dan Presentasi
1. Form tersedia di blog2. Laporan seminar diunggah di web
pada satu daftar3. Presentasi mandiri, hanya seorang,
dimulai di Semester II, III, dan IV4. Presentasi bisa bersumber dari
Topik Bidang Manajemen danKonsentrasi
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 2
Outline Global Company Profile: Hard Rock
Cafe What Is Operations Management? Organizing to Produce Goods and
Services Why Study OM? What Operations Managers Do
How This Book Is Organized
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 3
OperationsManagementOperationsManagementChapter 1 –Operations andProductivity
PowerPoint presentation to accompanyHeizer/RenderPrinciples of Operations Management, 7eOperations Management, 9e
05/10/2014
2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 4
Outline - Continued The Heritage of Operations
Management Operations in the Service Sector
Beda antra barang dan jasa Pertumbuhan jasa Pembayaran untuk jasa
Tren yang menarik pada manajemenoperasi
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 5
Outline - Continued
The Productivity Challenge Productivity Measurement Productivity Variables Productivity and the Service Sector
Ethics and Social Responsibility
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 6
Learning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapteryou should be able to:
1. Define operations management2. Explain the distinction between
goods and services3. Explain the difference between
production and productivity
05/10/2014
3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 7
Learning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapteryou should be able to:
4. Compute single-factorproductivity
5. Compute multifactor productivity6. Identify the critical variables in
enhancing productivity
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 8
The Hard Rock Cafe
First opened in 1971 Now – 121 restaurants in over 40 countries
Rock music memorabilia Creates value in the form of good food
and entertainment 3,500+ custom meals per day in Orlando How does an item get on the menu? Role of the Operations Manager
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 9
What Is OperationsManagement?
Production penciptaan barangdan jasa
Operations management (OM)rangkatian tindakan yang
menciptakan nilai dalam bentukbarang dan jasa dengan
mentransformasi input menjadioutput.
05/10/2014
4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 10
Organizing to ProduceGoods and Services
Essential functions: Marketing – menciptakan
permintaan Production/operations –
menciptakan barang dan jasa Finance/accounting – seberapa
baik perusahaan melakukanpembayaran dan mengumpul uang.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 11
Bagan organisasi
OperationsTellerSchedulingCheck ClearingCollectionTransactionprocessingFacilitiesdesign/layoutVault operationsMaintenanceSecurity
FinanceInvestmentsSecurityReal estate
Accounting
Auditing
MarketingLoans
CommercialIndustrialFinancialPersonalMortgage
Trust Department
Bank Komersil
Figure 1.1(A)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 12
Bagan Organisasi
OperationsGround support
equipmentMaintenanceGround Operations
Facilitymaintenance
CateringFlight OperationsCrew schedulingFlyingCommunicationsDispatching
Management science
Finance/accountingAccounting
PayablesReceivablesGeneral Ledger
FinanceCash controlInternational
exchange
Penerbangan
Figure 1.1(B)
MarketingTrafficadministration
ReservationsSchedulesTariffs (pricing)
SalesAdvertising
05/10/2014
5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 13
MarketingSales
promotionAdvertisingSalesMarketresearch
Organizational Charts
OperationsFacilities
Construction; maintenanceProduction and inventory control
Scheduling; materials controlQuality assurance and controlSupply chain managementManufacturing
Tooling; fabrication; assemblyDesign
Product development and designDetailed product specifications
Industrial engineeringEfficient use of machines, space,
and personnelProcess analysis
Development and installation ofproduction tools and equipment
Finance/accountingDisbursements/
creditsReceivablesPayablesGeneral ledger
Funds ManagementMoney marketInternational
exchangeCapital requirements
Stock issueBond issue
and recall
Manufacturing
Figure 1.1(C)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 14
Kenapa Mempelajari OM? Fungsi utama organisasi selain
(marketing, finance, and operations)
Bagaimana menghasilakan barangdan jasa sebagaimana diinginkanatau dibutuhkan pelanggan.
Mengetahui apa yang dikerjakan olehmanajer operasi.
Bagian yang mahal dalam organisasi.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 15
Opsi Menambah Kontribusi
Sales $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000Cost of Goods – 80,000 – 120,000 – 80,000 – 64,000Gross Margin 20,000 30,000 20,000 36,000Finance Costs – 6,000 – 6,000 – 3,000 – 6,000Subtotal 14,000 24,000 17,000 30,000Taxes at 25% – 3,500 – 6,000 – 4,250 – 7,500Contribution $ 10,500 $ 18,000 $ 12,750 $ 22,500
Finance/Marketing Accounting OM
Option Option Option
Increase Reduce ReduceSales Finance Production
Current Revenue 50% Costs 50% Costs 20%
05/10/2014
6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 16
Apa yang dikerjakanManajer Operasi
Planning Organizing Staffing Leading Controlling
Basic Management Functions
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 17
10 Keputusan KritisTen Decision Areas Chapter(s)
Design of goods and services 5 Managing quality 6, Supplement 6 Process and capacity 7, Supplement 7
design Location strategy 8 Layout strategy 9 Human resources and 10, Supplement 10
job design Supply chain 11, Supplement 11
management Inventory management 12, 14, 16 Scheduling 13, 15 Maintenance 17
Table 1.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 18
Keputusan Kritis Design of goods and services
What good or service should weoffer?
How should we design these productsand services?
Managing quality Bagaimana Mendefinisikan kualitas? Siapa yang bertanggungjawab
terhadap kualitas?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
05/10/2014
7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 19
Keputusan Kritis Process and capacity design
Proses dan kapasisitas apa yangdibutukan oleh barang dan jasa yangakan dihasilkan?
Peralatan dan teknologi apa yangdibutuhkan pada proses itu?
Location strategy Where should we put the facility? Apa kriteria keputusan penentuan
lokasi? Table 1.2 (cont.)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 20
Keputusan Strategis Layout strategy
How should we arrange the facility? How large must the facility be to meet
our plan?
Human resources and job design How do we provide a reasonable work
environment? How much can we expect our
employees to produce?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 21
Keputusan Strategis Supply chain management
Apakah kita membuat atau membelinya? Siapa pemasok dan bagaimana
mengintegrasikannya ke program e-commerce?
Inventory, material requirementsplanning, and JIT Berapa banyak persediaan yang dapat
dimilki? Kapan melakukan pesanan ulang?Table 1.2 (cont.)
05/10/2014
8
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 22
Keputusan Strategis Intermediate and short–term
scheduling Are we better off keeping people on
the payroll during slowdowns? Which jobs do we perform next?
Maintenance Who is responsible for maintenance? When do we do maintenance?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 23
Dimana MO bekerja?
Figure 1.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 24
Where are the OM Jobs? Technology/methods Facilities/space utilization Strategic issues Response time People/team development Customer service Quality Cost reduction Inventory reduction Productivity improvement
05/10/2014
9
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 25
Even yang signifikan pada MO
Figure 1.3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 26
Warisan MO
Division of labor (Adam Smith 1776;Charles Babbage 1852)
Standardized parts (Whitney 1800) Scientific Management (Taylor 1881) Coordinated assembly line (Ford/
Sorenson 1913) Gantt charts (Gantt 1916) Motion study (Frank and Lillian Gilbreth
1922) Quality control (Shewhart 1924; Deming
1950)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 27
Warisan MO
Computer (Atanasoff 1938) CPM/PERT (DuPont 1957) Material requirements planning (Orlicky 1960) Computer aided design (CAD 1970) Flexible manufacturing system (FMS 1975) Baldrige Quality Awards (1980) Computer integrated manufacturing (1990) Globalization (1992) Internet (1995)
05/10/2014
10
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 28
Eli Whitney
Born 1765; died 1825 In 1798, received government
contract to make 10,000 muskets Showed that machine tools could
make standardized parts to exactspecificationsMusket parts could be used in any
musket
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 29
Frederick W. Taylor
Born 1856; died 1915 Known as ‘father of scientific
management’ In 1881, as chief engineer for
Midvale Steel, studied how taskswere doneBegan first motion and time studies
Created efficiency principles
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 30
Taylor’s Principles
Matching employees to right job Providing the proper training Providing proper work methods and
tools Establishing legitimate incentives for
work to be accomplished
Management Should Take MoreResponsibility for:
05/10/2014
11
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 31
Frank & Lillian Gilbreth Frank (1868-1924); Lillian (1878-
1972) Husband-and-wife engineering team Further developed work
measurement methods Applied efficiency methods to their
home and 12 children! Book & Movie: “Cheaper by the
Dozen,” book: “Bells on Their Toes”
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 32
Born 1863; died 1947 In 1903, created Ford Motor
Company In 1913, first used moving assembly
line to make Model TUnfinished product moved by
conveyor past work station
Paid workers very well for 1911($5/day!)
Henry Ford
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 33
W. Edwards Deming
Born 1900; died 1993 Engineer and physicist Credited with teaching Japan
quality control methods in post-WW2
Used statistics to analyze process His methods involve workers in
decisions
05/10/2014
12
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 34
Bentuk Kontribusi
Human factors Industrial engineering Management science Biological science Physical sciences Information technology
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 35
Tantangan Baru MO
Global focus Just-in-time Supply chain
partnering Rapid product
development,alliances
Masscustomization
Empoweredemployees, teams
ToFrom Local or national focus Batch shipments Low bid purchasing
Lengthy productdevelopment
Standard products
Job specialization
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 36
Characteristics of Goods Tangible product Consistent product
definition Production usually
separate fromconsumption
Can be inventoried Low customer
interaction
05/10/2014
13
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 37
Characteristics of Service Intangible product Produced and
consumed at same time Often unique High customer
interaction Inconsistent product
definition Often knowledge-based Frequently dispersed
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 38
Industry and Services asPercentage of GDP
Services Manufacturing
Aus
tral
ia
Can
ada
Chi
na
Cze
ch R
ep
Fran
ce
Ger
man
y
Hon
g K
ong
Japa
n
Mex
ico
Rus
sian
Fed
Sout
h A
fric
a
Spai
n
UK US
90 −80 −70 −60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 −
0 −
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 39
Goods Versus Services
Table 1.3
Can be resoldCan be inventoriedSome aspects of qualitymeasurableSelling is distinct fromproductionProduct is transportable
Site of facility important for cost
Often easy to automateRevenue generated primarilyfrom tangible product
Attributes of Goods(Tangible Product)
Attributes of Services(Intangible Product)
Reselling unusualDifficult to inventoryQuality difficult to measure
Selling is part of service
Provider, not product, isoften transportableSite of facility important forcustomer contactOften difficult to automateRevenue generated primarilyfrom the intangible service
05/10/2014
14
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 40
Goods and ServicesAutomobile
ComputerInstalled carpeting
Fast-food mealRestaurant meal/auto repair
Hospital careAdvertising agency/
investment managementConsulting service/
teachingCounseling
Percent of Product that is a Good Percent of Product that is a Service
100% 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100%| | | | | | | | |
Figure 1.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 41
120 –
100 –
80 –
60 –
40 –
20 –
0 – | | | | | | |1950 1970 1990 2010 (est)
1960 1980 2000
Empl
oym
ent (
mill
ions
)
Manufacturing and ServiceEmployment
Figure 1.5 (A)
Manufacturing
Service
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 42
Manufacturing Employmentand Production
Figure 1.5 (B)
40 –30 –20 –10 –
0 – | | | | | | |1950 1970 1990 2010 (est)
1960 1980 2000
– 150
– 125
– 100
– 75
– 50
– 25
– 0
Empl
oym
ent (
mill
ions
)
Inde
x: 1
997
= 10
0
Manufacturingemployment
(left scale)
Industrialproduction
(right scale)
05/10/2014
15
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 43
Development of theService Economy
Figure 1.5 (C)
United StatesCanadaFrance
ItalyBritainJapan
W. Germany
1970 2008 (est)
| | | | |
40 50 60 70 80Percent
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 44
Organizations in Each Sector
Service Sector Example% of all
JobsEducation,Legal, Medical,and other
Notre Dame University,San Diego Zoo, ArnoldPalmer Hospital
25.5
Trade (retail,wholesale)
Walgreen’s, Wal-Mart,Nordstrom’s
15.1
Utilities,Transportation
Pacific Gas & Electric,American Airlines, SantaFe R.R., RoadwayExpress
5.2
Table 1.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 45
Organizations in Each SectorService Sector Example
% of allJobs
Professionaland BusinessServices
Snelling and Snelling, WasteManagement, Pitney-Bowes
10.1
Finance,Information,Real Estate
Citicorp, American Express,Prudential, Aetna, TrammelCrow, EDS, IBM
9.6
Food, Lodging,Entertainment
Olive Garden, Hard Rock Cafe,Motel 6, Hilton Hotels, WaltDisney, Paramount Pictures
8.5
PublicAdministration
U.S., State of Alabama, CookCounty
4.6
Table 1.4
05/10/2014
16
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 46
Organizations in Each SectorManufacturingSector Example
% of allJobs
Manufacturing General Electric, Ford,U.S. Steel, Intel
11.5
Construction Bechtel, McDermott 7.9
Agriculture King Ranch 1.6
Mining Homestake Mining 0.4
Sector Percent of all jobs
Service 78.6%
Manufacturing 21.4%Table 1.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 47
Tren Baru Pada MO
Local ornationalfocus
Reliable worldwidecommunication andtransportation networks
Global focus,movingproductionoffshore
Batch (large)shipments
Short product life cyclesand cost of capital putpressure on reducinginventory
Just-in-timeperformance
Low-bidpurchasing
Supply chain competitionrequires that suppliers beengaged in a focus on theend customer
Supply chainpartners,collaboration,alliances,outsourcing
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 48
New Trends in OM
Lengthyproductdevelopment
Shorter life cycles,Internet, rapid internationalcommunication, computer-aided design, andinternational collaboration
Rapid productdevelopment,alliances,collaborativedesigns
Standardizedproducts
Affluence and worldwidemarkets; increasinglyflexible productionprocesses
Masscustomizationwith addedemphasis onquality
Jobspecialization
Changing socioculturemilieu; increasingly aknowledge and informationsociety
Empoweredemployees,teams, and leanproduction
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
05/10/2014
17
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 49
New Trends in OM
Low-costfocus
Environmental issues, ISO14000, increasing disposalcosts
Environmentallysensitiveproduction, greenmanufacturing,recycledmaterials,remanufacturing
Ethics notat forefront
Businesses operate moreopenly; public and globalreview of ethics; oppositionto child labor, bribery,pollution
High ethicalstandards andsocialresponsibilityexpected
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 50
New Trends in OM Global focus Just-in-time performance Supply chain partnering Rapid product development Mass customization Empowered employees Environmentally sensitive production Ethics
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 51
Productivity Challenge
Productivity is the ratio of outputs (goodsand services) divided by the inputs
(resources such as labor and capital)
The objective is to improve productivity!
Important Note!Production is a measure of output
only and not a measure of efficiency
05/10/2014
18
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 52
Feedback loop
Outputs
Goodsand
services
Processes
The U.S. economic systemtransforms inputs to outputs
at about an annual 2.5%increase in productivity per
year. The productivityincrease is the result of a
mix of capital (38% of 2.5%),labor (10% of 2.5%), and
management (52% of 2.5%).
The Economic SystemInputs
Labor,capital,
management
Figure 1.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 53
Improving Productivity atStarbucks
A team of 10 analystscontinually look for waysto shave time. Someimprovements:Stop requiring signatureson credit card purchasesunder $25
Saved 8 secondsper transaction
Change the size of the icescoop
Saved 14 secondsper drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 secondsper shot
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 54
Improving Productivity atStarbucks
A team of 10 analystscontinually look for waysto shave time. Someimprovements:Stop requiring signatureson credit card purchasesunder $25
Saved 8 secondsper transaction
Change the size of the icescoop
Saved 14 secondsper drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 secondsper shot
Operations improvements havehelped Starbucks increase yearlyrevenue per outlet by $200,000 to$940,000 in six years.Productivity has improved by 27%,or about 4.5% per year.
05/10/2014
19
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 55
Measure of process improvement Represents output relative to input Only through productivity increases
can our standard of living improve
Productivity
Productivity =Units produced
Input used
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 56
Productivity Calculations
Productivity =Units produced
Labor-hours used
= = 4 units/labor-hour1,000250
Labor Productivity
One resource input single-factor productivity
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 57
Multi-Factor ProductivityOutput
Labor + Material + Energy+ Capital + Miscellaneous
Productivity =
Also known as total factor productivity Output and inputs are often expressed
in dollars
Multiple resource inputs multi-factor productivity
05/10/2014
20
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 58
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
=Old laborproductivity
8 titles/day32 labor-hrs
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 59
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
8 titles/day32 labor-hrs=Old labor
productivity = .25 titles/labor-hr
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 60
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
8 titles/day32 labor-hrs=Old labor
productivity
=New laborproductivity
= .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day32 labor-hrs
05/10/2014
21
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 61
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
8 titles/day32 labor-hrs=Old labor
productivity = .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day32 labor-hrs=New labor
productivity = .4375 titles/labor-hr
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 62
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
=Old multifactorproductivity
8 titles/day$640 + 400
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 63
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
8 titles/day$640 + 400=Old multifactor
productivity = .0077 titles/dollar
05/10/2014
22
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 64
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
8 titles/day$640 + 400=Old multifactor
productivity
=New multifactorproductivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
14 titles/day$640 + 800
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 65
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/dayNew System:
8 titles/day$640 + 400
14 titles/day$640 + 800
=Old multifactorproductivity
=New multifactorproductivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
= .0097 titles/dollar
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 66
Persoalan Pengukuran
Quality may change while thequantity of inputs and outputsremains constant
External elements may cause anincrease or decrease in productivity
Precise units of measure may belacking
05/10/2014
23
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 67
Variabel Produktivitas Labor - contributes
about 10% of theannual increase
Capital - contributesabout 38% of theannual increase
Management -contributes about 52%of the annual increase
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 68
Key Variables for ImprovedLabor Productivity
Basic education appropriate for thelabor force
Diet of the labor force Social overhead that makes labor
available Maintaining and enhancing skills in the
midst of rapidly changing technologyand knowledge
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 69
Labor SkillsAbout half of the 17-year-olds in the US cannotcorrectly answer questions of this type
Figure 1.8
05/10/2014
24
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 70
Investment and Productivity
10
8
6
4
2
0
Perc
ent i
ncre
ase
in p
rodu
ctiv
ity
Percentage investment10 15 20 25 30 35
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 71
Service Productivity
Typically labor intensive Frequently focused on unique
individual attributes or desires Often an intellectual task performed by
professionals Often difficult to mechanize Often difficult to evaluate for quality
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 72
Productivity at Taco BellImprovements:
Revised the menu Designed meals for easy preparation Shifted some preparation to suppliers Efficient layout and automation Training and employee empowerment
05/10/2014
25
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 73
Productivity at Taco BellImprovements:
Revised the menu Designed meals for easy preparation Shifted some preparation to suppliers Efficient layout and automation Training and employee empowerment
Results: Preparation time cut to 8 seconds Management span of control
increased from 5 to 30 In-store labor cut by 15 hours/day Stores handle twice the volume with
half the labor Fast-food low-cost leader
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 – 74
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Challenges facingoperations managers:
Developing and producing safe,quality products
Maintaining a clean environment Providing a safe workplace Honoring community commitments