Post on 25-Jan-2023
Perspectives of Landscape:
Views from Archaeology and Contemporary
Paganism
Paper for TAG 2008by William RathouseUniversity of Wales
Lampeter
Contemporary Pagans Paganism isn’t a unified religion, rather a field of related religions and spiritualities (Paganisms)
Main traditions: Wicca Shamanism Druidry Asatru
Common features Polytheism Recognises more than one deity Pantheism/Panentheism Sees the divine in the
material world Animism Belief in spirits or that all things are
alive Magic Belief in the ability of people to change
things through ritual or psychic activity
Archaeologists Like Paganisms there are many forms of Archaeology Contract/rescue archaeologists Academic Archaeologists
Practical and Theoretical Amateur archaeologists Heritage management professionals frequently have archaeological qualifications
This paper concentrates on Interpretive Academic Archaeologists with some reference to the work of Contract Archaeologists and Heritage Managers
What is Landscape? Where does the word come from?
A 17th Century Dutch word ‘Landschafe’ or ‘Landskap’
Landscape: Natural or imagined scenery as seen in a broad view (Pearsall & Trumble (eds) 2003:803)
A human conceptualisation of our environment. It is therefore a cultural construct
Landscape Archaeology? Archaeology is defined as:
The study of past human societies and their environments through the systematic recovery and analysis of material culture and physical remains (Darvill 2003:21)
Landscape Archaeology is therefore: A multidisciplinary approach providing a holistic approach to the study of historic and prehistoric societies by analysis of land conceptualisation and usage.
Types of Landscape Archaeology Descriptive & Interpretative
Mapping and plotting archaeological features… trying to work out their sequence and patterns of contemporaneity (Darvill 2003:221)
Types of Landscape Archaeology Descriptive & Interpretative
Concentrates on conceptualizations, attempting to get into the minds of ancient people using techniques such as Phenomenology and Hermeneutics with theoretical frameworks such as neo-Marxism, dwelling perspectives, and landscape as an economic proposition or mnemonic.
Contemporary Pagan ideas of Landscape The Earth as Deity
Landscape is therefore a part of the divine
The landscape as the abode of spirits Interactions with landscape may therefore be shaped by a desire to interact positively with the spirits who embody and dwell in that landscape
Green Issues A conservation ethos is greatly strengthened by this spirituality
Earth Mysteries Ideas stemming originally from academia but since abandoned there. Eg Ley Lines.
Contemporary Pagan ideas of Landscape (2)
Sacred Places Again partially inspired by academic theories, symbolism drawn from surviving cultures such as the idea of womb tombs
Ancestral Issues A desire to honour perceived ancesters.
Narratives in the landscape Following Australian aboriginal ideas of landscape, some Contemporary Pagans have tried to use Landscape as a narrative mnemonic.
Contemporary Pagan ideas of Landscape (3) Cosmologies and levels of existence Textual references to Scandinavian Pagan beliefs refer to cosmologies of other worlds above and below our own
Cross pollination and contestation Archaeological ideas filter into Contemporary Paganism A lot of these ideas are now out of date within academia
Conflict arises over issues such as Is Paganism a valid religion? Access to sites Excavation of/damage to sites Interpretations of the past Excavation and display of human remains
Archaeological concerns Charlatans and Dreamers Spurious pseudo-archaeology, Lack of academic rigour
Damage to sites Denial of research opportunities
Who OWNS the past?
Pagan grievances Active disrespect Insensitive Excavation Access to sites Exclusion of narratives favoured by pagans
Assessing Issues This research is at a very early stage so any assessments are subject to review and subsequent revision.
Perhaps there may be an input into archaeological theory from people who may share some aspects of belief with members of prehistoric societies
Not all pagan groups are unsupportive of an academic approach
Engagements with Contemporary Pagans by Heritage organisations have enjoyed some success
Cross fertilisation of ideas will continue to ensure an interactive relationship
Bibliography Barley N. (1995) Dancing on the Grave: Encounters with Death, John
Murray, London Bender B. (1998) Stonehenge: Making Space, Berg, Oxford & New York Blain J. & Wallis R, (2007) Sacred Sites Contested Rites/Rights, Sussex
Academic Press, Eastbourne & Portland Crowley A. (1986) Magick in theory and practice, Dover Publications,
New York Daniel G. (1992) Writing for “Antiquity”, Thames & Hudson Darvill T. (2003) Oxford Concise Dictionary of Archaeology, OUP, Oxford Harvey G. (1997) Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary Paganism,
Hurst & Co, London Hutton R. (2001) The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan
Witchcraft, OUP, Oxford Lane B.C. (2002) Landscapes of the sacred: Geography and narrative in
American spirituality, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore & London
Mason P. & Kuo I. R. (2006) Visitor Management at Stonehenge, UK, in Leek A. & Fyall A. (eds) Managing World Heritage Sites, Elsevier, London & Oxford
Pearsall J. & Trumble B. (eds) (2003) Oxford English Reference Dictionary, OUP, Oxford
Renfrew C. & Bahn P. (2004) Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, Thames & Hudson, London
Worthington A. (2005) Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion, Alternative Albion, Loughborough