Post on 17-Mar-2023
This report contains confidential and proprietary information of LegalMetric, Inc. Use of this information by anyone other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, or disclosure of this information to persons other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, without the consent of LegalMetric, Inc. is prohibited.
The information contained in this report is obtained from the official docket records of the federal courts. No attempt has been made to correct that data. For example, cases may be misclassified in the official docket records. In addition, cases are classified only by the primary cause of action. Cases having multiple causes of action are analyzed only under the primary cause of action identitied on the official court docket.
LegalMetric, Inc. is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and is not engaged in the practice of law. No attorney-client relationship exists between LegalMetric, Inc. and any user of its products. LegalMetric provides statistical and analytical information to anyone who desires to purchase that information. Any purchaser of LegalMetric products who wants legal advice should hire an attorney.
LegalMetric Individual Judge ReportJudge Sue Lewis Robinson
Patent CasesJanuary 2000 to September 2017
1
Overview: Total Cases and JudgmentsJudge Robinson was appointed to the bench on November 18, 1991. This judge has been assigned 1408 patent cases. Of these, 1388 cases have been terminated. There have been judgments in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in 201 case(s). The patent owner prevailed in 42.5% of these cases (while the accused infringer prevailed in 57.5% of these cases). (Note: In those instances where the judge previously served as a magistrate, earlier rulings issued while the judge was a magistrate are included in this report.)
Nation Robinson
Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win RatePendency (All Cases)Judgment PendencyContested PendencyTrial Pendency
53.522.063.112.321.527.137.5
42.531.254.515.026.930.936.4
Total
Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win RatePendency (All Cases)Judgment PendencyContested PendencyTrial Pendency
42.531.254.515.026.930.936.4
Color Scheme: Red in the table above indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the national average, or a pendency time at least 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Yellow indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Bright (lime) green indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months FASTER than the national average. And dark green indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time over 6 months FASTER than the national average.
The number of patent cases assigned to Judge Robinson by year is shown in the chart to the right. Note that this includes cases filed in previous years and reassigned to this judge, where applicable.
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
2000
20012002
20032004
20052006
20072008
20092010
20112012
20132014
20152016
2017
40
2135 31 34 40 39 38 41
47
6761
96
260
238
197
83
34
6
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Number of Cases Filed, by Year
2
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
2000
20012002
20032004
20052006
20072008
20092010
20112012
20132014
20152016
2017
014
30 32 34 37 38 33 3949
28
6775
106
206
287
187
89
37
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Number of Cases Decided, by YearThe number of patent cases decided by Judge Robinson by year is shown in the chart to the left. This can include cases decided earlier which are subsequently assigned to this judge for post-decision rulings.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Wilmington
16.0
2.2
Cases Filed in Last FiveYears
Cases Filed in Last Year
Court
Perc
en
tag
e o
f T
ota
l C
ases F
iled
One- and Five-Year Percentage of Cases for This Judge Fraction of Cases Assigned to This Judge, By Court: The fraction of cases assigned to this judge by court (and division if applicable) is shown in the chart to the left and in the table below. The figures are further broken out by percentage of cases filed in the previous five years and by percentage of cases filed in the previous year.
Total
Percentage of Cases Filed in Last Five Years
Percentage of Cases Filed in Last Year
Total 16.0 2.2
Wilmington 16.0 2.2
3
Patent Case Outcomes for Judge Robinson: The chart below shows the breakdown, by case outcome, for closed cases of this judge.
0.4%Bankruptcy Stay
2.9%Bench Trial
0.1%
Confirmation ofArbitration Award
3.4%Consent Judgment
4.4%Consolidated
1.7%Involuntary Dismissal
0.1%
Judgment as a Matterof Law
2.7%Jury Verdict
1.6%Lack of Jurisdiction
0.6%MDL Transfer
73.7%Voluntary Dismissal
1.9%Want of Prosecution
Case Outcomes for Judge
Total
Total 1388
Bankruptcy Stay 6
Bench Trial 40
Confirmation of Arbitration 1
Consent Judgment 47
Consolidated 61
Involuntary Dismissal 23
Judgment as a Matter of L 1
Jury Verdict 37
Lack of Jurisdiction 22
MDL Transfer 9
Other Settlement 3
Other Termination 15
Remand to State Court 2
Summary Judgment 48
Transfer 23
Voluntary Dismissal 1023
Want of Prosecution 27
4
Overview: Contested JudgmentsThere have been 154 contested judgments in these cases (does not include consent and default judgments). The patent owner prevailed in 31.2% of these cases, while the accused infringer prevailed in 68.8% of these cases. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below. In addition, the patentee contested win rate for the judge by year is shown in the second chart below.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Patent Owner Accused Infringer
22.0
78.0
31.2
68.8
NationRobinson
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Contested Win Rates, Judge v. Nation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000
2,00
1.00
2002
2,00
3.00
2004
2,00
5.00
2006
2,00
7.00
2008
2,00
9.00
2010
2,01
1.00
2012
2,01
3.00
2014
2,01
5.00
2016
2,01
7.00
Year of Decision
Co
nte
ste
d W
in R
ate
(P
erc
en
tag
e)
Contested Win Rate by Year
5
Overview: TrialsThere have been 77 terminations by trial in these cases (includes both bench and jury trials). The patent owner prevailed in 54.5% of these case, while the accused infringer prevailed in 45.5% of these cases. Trials on which judgment has not been entered are not included in these figures. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Patent Owner Accused Infringer
63.1
36.9
54.5
45.5
NationRobinson
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Trial Win Rates, Judge v. Nation
6
Patentee Win Rates: By Nominating President: The number of patent cases in this district assigned toactive judges and the win rates for those cases are shown below, broken out by the nominating president.
2,997Barack Obama
1,492George Bush
11George W. Bush
1,831William J. Clinton
Barack Obama 47.3%George Bush 23.6%George W. Bush 0.2%William J. Clinton 28.9%
Total: 100.0%
Number of Cases - by Nominating President Number of Cases: The number of cases assigned to active jduges in this district is shown in the chart to the left, broken out by nominating president. This includes all cases of the type covered by this report.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Barack Obama George Bush George W. Bush William J.Clinton
Overall Win RateContested Win RateTrial Win Rate
Pla
inti
ff P
erc
en
tag
e o
f C
as
es
Wo
n
Win Rates by Nominating PresidentPatentee Win Rates: The win rates for these cases, broken out by nominating president, are shown in the chart to the right. This includes overall win rates (includes consent and default judgments), contested win rates (does NOT include consent and default judgments), and trial win rates (cases decided by bench trial or jury verdict).
Total
Overall Win Rate
# of Judgments
Contested Win Rate
# of Contested Judgments
Trial Win Rate
# of Trial Jugements
Barack Obama 45.6 296 36.1 205 68.6 70
George Bush 44.0 224 32.7 171 55.4 83
George W. Bush 0 0 0
William J. Clinton 58.2 176 43.4 91 62.5 52
7
Overview: Markman RulingsThere were 116 Markman/claim construction rulings in these cases, not counting rulings made in connection with summary judgment motions. The average time from case filing to Markman rulings was 25.6 months. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Markman/Claim Construction section below.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
JudgeNation
Mo
nth
s f
rom
Ca
se
Filin
gAverage Time to Markman Decision
Overview: Summary JudgmentThere were 492 summary judgment rulings on contested motions in these cases. The win rate on these contested motions was 35.4%. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Summary Judgment Motion section below.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
JudgeNation
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Contested Summary Judgment Win Rates, by Year
8
Overview: Stay Pending Reexamination and Stay Pending Inter Partes ReviewThe win rate on motions to stay pending reexamination and on motions to stay pending Inter Partes Review for this judge are shown in the chart and table below. The table also includes the number of such motion decisions. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Stay Motion section below.
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Judge Stay PendingReexamNation Stay PendingReexam
Judge Stay Pending IPR
Nation Stay Pending IPRPe
rce
nta
ge
Contested Stay Pending Reexam Win Rates, by Year
Total
Stay Pending Reexam Win Rate
# of Stay Pending Reexam Decisions
Stay Pending IPR Win Rate
# of Stay Pending IPR Decisions
Total 32.4 17 33.3 6
2009 0.0 1 0
2010 50.0 2 0
2011 16.7 3 0
2012 0.0 2 0
2013 0.0 1 0
2014 66.7 3 33.3 3
2015 0.0 2 33.3 3
2016 50.0 2 0
2017 100.0 1 0
9
Overview: Time to Disposition-All CasesThe average time from case filing to case disposition by Judge Robinson is 15.0 months. The distribution of case terminations by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3334 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Clo
se
d C
as
es
Distribution of All Closed Cases
Overview: Time to Disposition-Cases with JudgmentsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by judgment in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in these cases is 26.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.
0123456789
1011121314151617181920
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Clo
se
d C
as
es
Distribution of Cases Closed by Judgment
10
Overview: Time to Disposition-Contested JudgmentsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by contested judgment (does NOT include consent and default judgments) in these cases is 30.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.
0123456789
1011121314151617181920
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 4243 44 45 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Clo
se
d C
as
es
Distribution of Cases Closed by Contested Judgment
Overview: Time to Disposition-TrialsThe average time from case filing to case disposition by trial (includes bench and jury trials) in these cases is 36.4 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
88.5
99.510
10.511
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 3334 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Clo
se
d C
as
es
Distribution of Cases Closed by Trial
11
Case Outcomes with Judgments:The win rates for patent owners and accused infringers by various outcomes are shown below. Details for each outcome are set forth in the following sections of the report.
Patentee Win Rate Accused Infringer
Total 42.5 57.5
Bench Trial 42.5 57.5
Confirmation of Arbitration Award 0.0 100.0
Consent Judgment 79.8 20.2
Involuntary Dismissal 8.7 91.3
Judgment as a Matter of Law 0.0 100.0
Jury Verdict 67.6 32.4
Other Termination 25.0 75.0
Summary Judgment 6.3 93.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bench
Tria
l
Con
firm
ation
of
Arbitr
ation
Awar
d
Con
sent
Jud
gmen
t
Invo
lunt
ary
Dism
issal
Judg
men
t as a
Mat
ter o
f Law
Jury
Ver
dict
Oth
er T
erm
inat
ion
Summ
ary
Judg
men
t
42.5
0.0
79.8
8.7
0.0
67.6
25.0
6.3
57.5
100.0
20.2
91.3
100.0
32.4
75.0
93.8
PatenteeAccused Infringer
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Case Win Rates, by Outcome
12
Bench Trial
There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Bench Trial
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyBayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al
1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 33.1
Kao Corporation, et al v. Unilever U S Inc., et al
1:01cv00680 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 35.8
Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al
1:02cv00332 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 27.2
Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical
1:02cv01250 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 32.7
Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corporation, et al
1:03cv00848 Bench Trial Patentee 22.7
Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI Inc., et al
1:03cv01158 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 42.3
Bayer AG, et al v. Dr. Reddy's Lab.Ltd., et al
1:04cv00179 Bench Trial Patentee 44.2
In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation
1:05cv00356 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 38.8
Vanderbilt University v. ICOS Corporation
1:05cv00506 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 42.3
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:06cv00033 Bench Trial Both 26.4
Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:06cv00234 Bench Trial Patentee 42.5
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:07cv00331 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 29.6
Cancer Research Technology Limited v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al
1:07cv00457 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 30.413
Bench Trial
There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Bench Trial
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:07cv00779 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 30.7
Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:07cv00823 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 39.4
Biacore AB, et al v. Thermo Bioanalysis
1:97cv00274 Bench Trial Patentee 46.8
Clontech Labs Inc. v. Invitrogen
1:98cv00750 Bench Trial Patentee 53.2
Union Carbide Chem, et al v. Shell Oil Company, et al
1:99cv00274 Bench Trial Patentee 61.4
Genetics Institute LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc.
1:08cv00290 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 21.4
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00330 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 33.2
Eurand Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00889 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 29.5
OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:09cv00185 Bench Trial Patentee 37.4
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.
1:09cv00286 Bench Trial Patentee 37.2
Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.
1:09cv00333 Bench Trial Patentee 28.5
Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00492 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 22.1
Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00715 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 19.614
Bench Trial
There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Bench Trial
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCephalon Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00724 Bench Trial Patentee 17.9
Eurand, Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
1:09cv00922 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 17.1
Eurand Inc et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
1:09cv00923 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 17.1
In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation
1:09md02118 Bench Trial Both 17.3
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:11cv00164 Bench Trial Patentee 28.9
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:11cv00271 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 28.3
Intendis GmbH et al v. Glenmark Generics Limited et al
1:13cv00421 Bench Trial Patentee 28.4
Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. et al
1:13cv00925 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 15.5
Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al
1:13cv01602 Bench Trial Patentee 33.6
Orexo AB et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
1:14cv00829 Bench Trial Patentee 28.7
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:14cv00874 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 28.5
Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:14cv01038 Bench Trial Patentee 27.915
Bench Trial
There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Bench Trial
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyEndo Pharmaceuticals Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc.
1:14cv01422 Bench Trial Patentee 26.7
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:15cv00250 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 22.4
16
Confirmation of Arbitration Award
There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Confirmation of Arbitration Award. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 68.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Confirmation of Arbitration Award
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCordis Corporation v. Medtronic Vascular
1:00cv00886 Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Accused Infringer 68.2
17
Consent Judgment
There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Consent Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyJupiter Media Metrix v. PC Data Inc
1:00cv00874 Consent Judgment Patentee 5.8
Original Creatine v. Twin Laboratories
1:02cv00365 Consent Judgment Patentee 13.8
Emulex Corporation v. Qlogic Corporation
1:03cv00237 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.1
Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al v. Pharmaceutical Inc., et al
1:03cv00808 Consent Judgment Patentee 11.5
Versus Technology v. Radianse Inc.
1:04cv01231 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.7
Item Development AB et al v. SICOR Inc. et al
1:05cv00336 Consent Judgment Patentee 29.1
King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc. et al v. SICOR Inc. et al
1:05cv00337 Consent Judgment Patentee 29.1
MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:06cv00164 Consent Judgment Patentee 25.4
CooperVision Inc. v. CIBA Vision Corporation
1:06cv00239 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.4
Block Drug Company, Inc. v. Sedona Laboratories Inc.
1:06cv00350 Consent Judgment Patentee 12.8
3M Innovative Properties Company et al v. Assuretec Systems Inc.
1:06cv00375 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.4
Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment Patentee 13.4
MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:07cv00204 Consent Judgment Patentee 12.2
MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
1:07cv00407 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.2
18
Consent Judgment
There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Consent Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyKenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation
1:07cv00521 Consent Judgment Patentee 46.8
Cytyc Corporation v. Autocyte Inc.
1:99cv00610 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.0
WebXchange Inc. v. Allstate Corporation et al
1:08cv00131 Consent Judgment Both 1.8
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:08cv00779 Consent Judgment Patentee 15.5
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
1:09cv00241 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.7
Streamlight, Inc. v. 221B Resources LLC
1:17cv00036 Consent Judgment Patentee 2.1
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Congoleum Corporation
1:10cv00081 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.0
Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation et al
1:11cv00516 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.4
Belden Inc. v. Superior Essex Inc. et al
1:11cv00678 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.3
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
1:11cv01152 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.9
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 19.7
Depomed Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. Florida et al
1:12cv00492 Consent Judgment Patentee 20.7
Astellas US LLC et al v. Hospira Inc.
1:12cv00652 Consent Judgment Patentee 4.2
19
Consent Judgment
There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Consent Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAstellas US LLC et al v. Akorn Inc.
1:12cv01489 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.4
Astellas US LLC et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC
1:12cv01699 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.4
Depomed Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al
1:13cv00342 Consent Judgment Patentee 10.3
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc.
1:13cv00428 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
1:13cv00429 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 22.9
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al
1:13cv00430 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Disney Online et al.
1:13cv00433 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Vevo LLC
1:13cv00436 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 24.3
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Viacom International Inc.
1:13cv00437 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 24.3
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc.
1:13cv00962 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 21.8
Poly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.
1:14cv00599 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 17.1
Cephalon Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL Inc. et al
1:14cv00776 Consent Judgment Patentee 11.2
Janssen Products LP et al v. Cipla Ltd. et al
1:14cv01056 Consent Judgment Patentee 8.6
20
Consent Judgment
There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Consent Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAstellas US LLC et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
1:14cv01246 Consent Judgment Patentee 6.0
Janssen Products LP et al v. Cipla Ltd. et al
1:15cv00307 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.8
Tervis Tumbler Company, Inc. v. Coleman Company Inc. et al
1:15cv00660 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.9
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
1:15cv00900 Consent Judgment Patentee 21.0
Dragerwerk AG & Co. KGaA et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.
1:15cv00925 Consent Judgment Patentee 4.0
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
1:16cv00300 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.9
Lupin Atlantis Holdings S.A. v. InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:16cv00708 Consent Judgment Patentee 10.8
21
Involuntary Dismissal
There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8 9 10 11 17 18
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Involuntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyIntersil Corporation, et al v. Proxim Inc.
1:01cv00266 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.2
Ellenby Technologies, et al v. AT Systems Inc., et al
1:01cv00416 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.7
Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al
1:03cv00990 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 8.0
Vermeer Manu. v. Deere & Company
1:04cv01343 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 9.9
Time Warner Cable Inc. v. USA Video Technology Corp.
1:06cv00387 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 16.5
Brinkmeier v. BIC Corporation et al
1:09cv00860 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.4
Brinkmeier v. Bayer Healthcare LLC
1:10cv00001 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.7
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:11cv01171 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.7
McDowell v. USA et al 1:12cv01302 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.9
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC
1:13cv00538 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company
1:13cv00539 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC
1:13cv00540 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc.
1:13cv00541 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2
22
Involuntary Dismissal
There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8 9 10 11 17 18
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Involuntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyVehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc.
1:13cv00542 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc.
1:13cv00712 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 16.7
Goodman Manufacturing Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation
1:13cv02014 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.5
Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.
1:13cv01656 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.7
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al
1:14cv00579 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.9
Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank et al
1:14cv01427 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5
Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC Bank N.A.
1:14cv01428 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5
Parus Holdings Inc. v. SunTrust Bank et al
1:14cv01429 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5
Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Lexmark International Inc
1:14cv01489 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.7
Device Enhancement LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:15cv00762 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 8.5
23
Judgment as a Matter of Law
There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Judgment as a Matter of Law. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 84.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Judgment as a Matter of Law
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyCordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:98cv00197 Judgment as a Matter of Law
Accused Infringer 84.6
24
Jury Verdict
There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Jury Verdict
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyEaton Corporation v. Parker-Hannifin Corp
1:00cv00751 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 34.1
Intel Corporation v. Broadcom Corporation
1:00cv00796 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 30.4
Stambler v. RSA Security Inc., et al
1:01cv00065 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 26.4
Elster Electricity v. SchlumbergerSema Inc
1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict Both 28.2
Intuitive Surgical, et al v. Computer Motion Inc.
1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict Patentee 20.4
ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., et al
1:01cv00504 Jury Verdict Patentee 21.6
Symbol Technologies v. Proxim Inc.
1:01cv00801 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.0
Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al
1:02cv01331 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 40.7
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Both 56.3
Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion Wireless, et al
1:03cv00983 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.5
IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et al
1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.6
TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation
1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict Patentee 22.8
McKesson Automation Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG et al
1:06cv00028 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 72.0
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company
1:06cv00091 Jury Verdict Patentee 33.0
25
Jury Verdict
There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Jury Verdict
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencySiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.
1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict Patentee 18.0
Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al
1:08cv00063 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.1
TA Instruments, et al v. Perkin - Elmer Corp.
1:95cv00545 Jury Verdict Patentee 92.8
C R Bard Inc v. Medtronic, Inc
1:96cv00589 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 58.2
Cordis Corporation, et al v. Advanced Cardio Sys, et al
1:97cv00550 Jury Verdict Patentee 101.7
Arterial Vascular, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al
1:97cv00700 Jury Verdict Patentee 87.1
Boston Scientific, et al v. Johnson and Johnson, et al
1:98cv00019 Jury Verdict Patentee 98.5
Abbott Cardio Sys, et al v. Medtronic Vascular, et al
1:98cv00080 Jury Verdict Patentee 84.0
Pechiney Rhenalu v. Alcoa Inc.
1:99cv00301 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 40.3
MLMC Ltd. v. Airtouch Comm Inc., et al
1:99cv00781 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 25.3
Scimed Life Systems, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
1:99cv00904 Jury Verdict Patentee 33.2
SOITEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc.
1:08cv00292 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.8
Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp
1:08cv00542 Jury Verdict Patentee 20.126
Jury Verdict
There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Jury Verdict
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAsahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. Guardian Industries Corp.
1:09cv00515 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.2
ArcelorMittal France et al v. AK Steel Corporation et al
1:10cv00050 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 12.1
Ironworks Patents LLC v. Apple Inc.
1:10cv00258 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.6
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation
1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict Patentee 22.8
Vehicle IP LLC v. Werner Enterprises Inc.
1:10cv00503 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 42.3
Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.
1:10cv00999 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 35.5
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC
1:11cv00908 Jury Verdict Patentee 53.8
INVISTA North America S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al
1:11cv01007 Jury Verdict Patentee 29.3
SRI International Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:13cv01534 Jury Verdict Patentee 44.6
Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et al
1:14cv01317 Jury Verdict Patentee 26.6
27
Other Termination
There was/were 4 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The patentee win rate was 25.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 75.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 35.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
13 18 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Other Termination
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyHousey v. Abbott Pharm Corp., et al
1:01cv00401 Other Termination Accused Infringer 17.4
Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al
1:03cv00283 Other Termination Patentee 54.4
Medtronic Vascular v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:04cv00034 Other Termination Accused Infringer 12.6
Stephenson v. Game Show Network LLC et al
1:12cv00614 Other Termination Accused Infringer 55.6
28
Summary Judgment
There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Summary Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyAugustine Medical v. Mallinckrodt Med Inc, et al
1:01cv00387 Summary Judgment Patentee 22.2
Izumi Products Co v. Koninklijke Philips, et al
1:02cv00156 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.1
Toshiba Corporation v. Juniper Networks, et al
1:03cv01035 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 33.6
Monsanto Company, et al v. Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al
1:04cv00305 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 24.8
SRI International v. Internet Security, et al
1:04cv01199 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.0
LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & Body Works, et al
1:04cv01507 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2
Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al
1:05cv00141 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 22.3
Automated Transactions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al
1:06cv00043 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 64.5
Nuance Communications Inc. et al v. Tellme Networks Inc.
1:06cv00105 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 50.1
IGT v. Bally Gaming International Inc. et al
1:06cv00282 Summary Judgment Patentee 48.0
Oracle Corporation et al v. Parallel Networks LLC
1:06cv00414 Summary Judgment Patentee 29.8
Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.
1:06cv00557 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.1
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.
1:07cv00272 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 45.2
Wellman Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Company
1:07cv00585 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 28.429
Summary Judgment
There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Summary Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyBoston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00765 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.8
Accenture Global Services GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc.
1:07cv00826 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 42.1
Manchak v. Chemical Lime Co., et al
1:98cv00356 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 53.9
Medtronic Vascular v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:98cv00478 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 77.7
Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
1:08cv00568 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 40.3
Autocell Laboratories Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:08cv00760 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.9
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:10cv00039 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.0
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
1:10cv00428 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 37.2
Helicos Biosciences Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc
1:10cv00735 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.2
Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm Foods Inc.
1:10cv00841 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.1
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:11cv00054 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.8
Apeldyn Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al
1:11cv00440 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 46.5
Motivation Innovations LLC v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc.
1:11cv00615 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 37.0
30
Summary Judgment
There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Summary Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyTechnology Innovations LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:11cv00690 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.8
CyberFone Systems LLC v. CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al
1:11cv00829 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.1
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
1:11cv00831 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.1
Cradle IP LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.
1:11cv01254 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 23.6
Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun Products Corporation
1:12cv00651 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.2
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc.
1:12cv01138 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.1
YYZ LLC v. Hewlett Packard Company
1:13cv00136 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 32.4
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc.
1:13cv00148 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 10.2
Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:13cv00576 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 3.9
YYZ LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.
1:13cv00579 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 29.9
YYZ LLC v. Pegasystems Inc.
1:13cv00581 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 29.9
ArcelorMittal et al v. AK Steel Corporation
1:13cv00685 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 7.7
ArcelorMittal France et al v. Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al
1:13cv00686 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 7.7
31
Summary Judgment
There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Outcomes by MonthFor Summary Judgment
The supporting data is shown below.Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party PendencyPoly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.
1:13cv00693 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.5
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:13cv00941 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.0
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes Noble Inc.
1:13cv00942 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.0
Motivation Innovations LLC v. PetSmart Inc.
1:13cv00957 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.4
Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
1:14cv00194 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.7
BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.
1:14cv01204 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 17.4
Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc.
1:14cv01482 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.4
Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Cokebusters USA Inc.
1:14cv01483 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 30.9
32
Case Outcomes with No Judgments in Favor of a Party:The cases terminated without a judgment in favor of a party are identified below, including the distribution of those outcomes by month of litigation.
Bankruptcy Stay
There was/were 6 case(s) terminated by Bankruptcy Stay. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 8.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 2 4 10 13 21
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Bankruptcy Stay
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
FreeMarkets Inc. v. PurchasePro.com Inc., et al
1:02cv00162 12.7Bankruptcy Stay
British Telecomm. v. Touch America
1:03cv00529 1.6Bankruptcy Stay
Lancaster Composite v. Hardcore Composites
1:03cv00840 10.0Bankruptcy Stay
Denso Corporation v. Delphi Corporation et al
1:05cv00481 4.0Bankruptcy Stay
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Journal Register Company
1:12cv01193 0.4Bankruptcy Stay
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. SunEdison, Inc. et al
1:14cv01078 20.2Bankruptcy Stay
33
Consolidation
There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Scimed Life Systems, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
1:00cv00404 8.7Consolidation
Informix Software v. Intl Bus Machines
1:00cv00628 7.4Consolidation
Genzyme Corporation v. Genentech Inc.
1:01cv00229 2.2Consolidation
FreeMarkets Inc. v. B2eMarkets Inc.
1:02cv00164 2.9Consolidation
FreeMarkets Inc. v. Procuri Inc.
1:02cv00165 2.9Consolidation
Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals
1:04cv00047 1.3Consolidation
Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Impax Laboratories
1:04cv00048 1.3Consolidation
Tenneco Operating v. Visteon Corporation
1:04cv00909 6.0Consolidation
DeKalb Genetic Corporation v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
1:05cv00355 2.7Consolidation
Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:05cv00371 4.5Consolidation
Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. et al
1:05cv00380 4.4Consolidation
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. et al v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al
1:05cv00381 4.4Consolidation
Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. et al
1:05cv00382 4.4Consolidation
Internet Security Systems, Inc. v. SRI International
1:05cv00405 2.3Consolidation
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. et al v. Alphapharm Pty Ltd.
1:05cv00420 4.0Consolidation
34
Consolidation
There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:05cv00451 3.7Consolidation
Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Intermec Technologies Corp.
1:05cv00528 2.2Consolidation
Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
1:07cv00195 1.2Consolidation
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00333 31.9Consolidation
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00348 31.7Consolidation
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00409 11.6Consolidation
Elan Corporation PLC v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al
1:07cv00603 4.7Consolidation
Elan Corporation PLC et al v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC
1:07cv00679 3.7Consolidation
Elan Corporation PLC et al v. Barr Laboratories Inc.
1:07cv00736 3.2Consolidation
Luv N Care Ltd. v. Bamed AG
1:08cv00213 1.7Consolidation
Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Vurv Technology Inc.
1:08cv00276 4.9Consolidation
Ethypharm S.A. v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al
1:08cv00344 3.1Consolidation
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00810 7.0Consolidation
Novartis Corporation et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al
1:08cv00952 2.5Consolidation
35
Consolidation
There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00074 3.9Consolidation
OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:09cv00186 1.6Consolidation
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:09cv00305 23.0Consolidation
Eurand Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:09cv00816 5.5Consolidation
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.
1:10cv00198 0.3Consolidation
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:10cv00264 1.0Consolidation
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
1:10cv00488 3.4Consolidation
Automated Transactions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al
1:10cv00691 31.9Consolidation
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
1:10cv00766 1.6Consolidation
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:11cv00145 5.6Consolidation
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:11cv00439 2.6Consolidation
Apeldyn Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
1:11cv00581 11.7Consolidation
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc.
1:11cv00926 3.9Consolidation
36
Consolidation
There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc.
1:11cv01059 3.3Consolidation
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:11cv01111 0.9Consolidation
Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:12cv00073 0.7Consolidation
Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:12cv00247 0.4Consolidation
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:12cv00815 3.4Consolidation
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC. et al
1:12cv01088 3.3Consolidation
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Mylan Inc. et al
1:13cv01605 5.8Consolidation
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:13cv01606 5.8Consolidation
Forest Laboratories, LLC et al v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
1:14cv01266 4.1Consolidation
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01349 1.6Consolidation
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01393 1.1Consolidation
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01414 0.9Consolidation
Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:14cv01504 1.4Consolidation
Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
1:15cv00158 1.2Consolidation
Forest Laboratories LLC et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
1:15cv00430 4.1Consolidation
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. et al
1:15cv00960 13.8Consolidation37
Consolidation
There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Consolidation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:15cv01063 3.0Consolidation
38
Lack of Jurisdiction
There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Lack of Jurisdiction
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
PE Corporation, et al v. Affymetrix, Inc.
1:00cv00629 14.8Lack of Jurisdiction
DuPont Dow Elastomer v. Greene Tweed of DE
1:00cv00822 9.1Lack of Jurisdiction
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al
1:06cv00613 14.0Lack of Jurisdiction
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00259 6.5Lack of Jurisdiction
Innovative Therapies Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al
1:07cv00589 13.4Lack of Jurisdiction
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron LLC
1:07cv00650 16.8Lack of Jurisdiction
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al
1:07cv00780 5.4Lack of Jurisdiction
Edmunds Holding Company et al v. Autobytel Inc.
1:08cv00149 11.3Lack of Jurisdiction
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Wall Cardiovascular Technologies LLC
1:08cv00489 12.6Lack of Jurisdiction
Andrew LLC v. TruePosition Inc.
1:09cv00669 6.7Lack of Jurisdiction
Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc. et al
1:11cv00313 26.3Lack of Jurisdiction
Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
1:11cv00772 33.1Lack of Jurisdiction
Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:12cv00140 16.4Lack of Jurisdiction
Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc.
1:12cv00141 16.4Lack of Jurisdiction
Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc.
1:12cv00142 16.4Lack of Jurisdiction 39
Lack of Jurisdiction
There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Lack of Jurisdiction
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01301 15.7Lack of Jurisdiction
NCR Corporation v. Automated Transactions LLC et al
1:14cv00779 9.3Lack of Jurisdiction
Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. v. Automated Transactions LLC et al
1:14cv01189 6.5Lack of Jurisdiction
Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:15cv00260 4.4Lack of Jurisdiction
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Company L.P.
1:15cv00431 8.8Lack of Jurisdiction
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Company L.P.
1:15cv00432 8.8Lack of Jurisdiction
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNA et al
1:15cv00661 16.5Lack of Jurisdiction
40
MDL Transfer
There was/were 9 case(s) terminated by MDL Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 4.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor MDL Transfer
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Laughlin Products v. Chisholm, et al
1:02cv00582 6.7MDL Transfer
Laughlin Products v. Johnson, et al
1:02cv01608 3.8MDL Transfer
Astrazeneca AB, et al v. Eon Labs Inc.
1:04cv00205 4.7MDL Transfer
Agfa Corp., et al v. Compression Labs Inc, et al
1:04cv00818 7.7MDL Transfer
AstraZeneca AB, et al v. Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al
1:04cv00891 2.3MDL Transfer
Yahoo Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc, et al
1:04cv00918 6.7MDL Transfer
Audiovox Corporation, et al v. Compression Labs Inc, et al
1:04cv01293 5.2MDL Transfer
AstraZeneca AB, et al v. Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al
1:04cv01533 1.6MDL Transfer
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
1:12cv00305 3.0MDL Transfer
41
Other Settlement
There was/were 3 case(s) terminated by Other Settlement. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 27.4. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
19 30 35
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Other Settlement
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
British Telecomm. v. Level 3 Comm Inc., et al
1:03cv00530 18.2Other Settlement
LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar Inc.
1:10cv00269 34.3Other Settlement
LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar Inc.
1:10cv00715 29.6Other Settlement
42
Other Termination
There was/were 11 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 22.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
6 14 17 21 30 42 45
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Other Termination
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Ferring BV v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al
1:04cv00884 41.9Other Termination
Lingamfelter v. Coca-Cola Enterprise, et al
1:04cv01261 41.4Other Termination
Guardian Industries v. Dell Inc., et al
1:05cv00027 44.5Other Termination
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al
1:09cv00917 20.2Other Termination
Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:10cv00024 20.4Other Termination
Elpida Memory Inc. et al v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al
1:11cv00623 13.5Other Termination
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:12cv00419 29.6Other Termination
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al
1:12cv01333 16.1Other Termination
Activision TV Inc. v. National CineMedia LLC
1:13cv00853 13.0Other Termination
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
1:15cv00698 5.5Other Termination
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
1:15cv00710 5.3Other Termination
43
Remand to State Court
There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Remand to State Court. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 28.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
29
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Remand to State Court
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Bio-Technology Gen. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al
1:02cv00235 28.1Remand to State Court
44
Transfer
There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Transfer
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Air Products v. MG Nitrogen Services, et al
1:00cv00457 9.8Transfer
Original Creatine v. Kaizen Inc.
1:02cv00471 7.7Transfer
Miteq Inc. v. Comtech Telecomm.
1:02cv01336 5.8Transfer
Genfoot Inc. v. Payless Shoesource
1:03cv00398 7.5Transfer
AstraZeneca AB, et al v. Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al
1:04cv00080 6.7Transfer
Sumitomo Mitsubishi, et al v. MEMC Electronic
1:04cv00852 10.1Transfer
Finkelstein v. Mardkha, et al 1:04cv01423 2.0Transfer
Chih-Wen Chung v. Lumatec Industries
1:04cv01451 6.5Transfer
Arrow Communication Laboratories Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates Inc.
1:05cv00357 4.8Transfer
Ablaise Ltd. et al v. Bank of America Corporation
1:06cv00530 6.9Transfer
Riverbed Technology Inc. v. Quantum Corporation et al
1:08cv00016 1.6Transfer
Motorola Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al
1:08cv00104 6.5Transfer
Belden Technologies Inc. v. LS Corp. et al
1:08cv00823 23.7Transfer
Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc.
1:08cv00838 3.9Transfer
FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation et al
1:09cv00872 4.6Transfer
Brinkmeier v. Exergen Corporation
1:10cv00176 10.1Transfer
45
Transfer
There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
1
2
3
4
5
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Transfer
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc. et al
1:10cv00419 10.4Transfer
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc.
1:10cv01099 6.0Transfer
Fuisz Pharma LLC v. Theranos Inc.
1:11cv01061 7.2Transfer
Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc. 1:12cv01066 8.8Transfer
Ponziani v. Ford Motor Company et al
1:14cv00266 1.9Transfer
CO2 Solutions Inc. v. Akermin Inc.
1:15cv01123 4.3Transfer
Mitchell Ellis Products, Inc. v. Agrinomix LLC
1:16cv00367 9.9Transfer
46
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Intl Bus Machines v. Informix Corp.
1:00cv00073 17.9Voluntary Dismissal
Matsushita Electric v. Inverness Medical, et al
1:00cv00143 28.6Voluntary Dismissal
Color Kinetics Inc. v. Polaris Pool Systems
1:00cv00160 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Softspikes Inc. v. Sure Grip Inc.
1:00cv00398 11.9Voluntary Dismissal
Axiohm IPB Inc. v. Epson America Inc., et al
1:00cv00420 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
Edwards Lifesciences v. Medtronic Inc.
1:00cv00621 21.8Voluntary Dismissal
Agilent Technologies v. Methode Electronics, et al
1:00cv00942 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
Europaisches Lab v. ISIS Pharmaceuticals
1:00cv00962 12.0Voluntary Dismissal
Housey Pharmaceutica, et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim, et al
1:00cv01002 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
Monsanto Company, et al v. Bayer Cropscience, et al
1:00cv01013 34.6Voluntary Dismissal
IQE (Europe) Ltd., et al v. Rockwell Tech., et al
1:00cv01069 21.3Voluntary Dismissal
Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Alcon Laboratories
1:01cv00070 20.5Voluntary Dismissal
Allergan Inc., et al v. Pharmacia Corp., et al
1:01cv00141 20.1Voluntary Dismissal
Proxim Incorporated v. 3Com Corporation, et al
1:01cv00155 25.2Voluntary Dismissal
Genentech Inc. v. Genzyme Corporation
1:01cv00168 20.9Voluntary Dismissal
Cypress Semiconduct v. Philips Semiconduct
1:01cv00178 8.8Voluntary Dismissal
Jupiter Media Metrix v. NetRatings, Inc
1:01cv00193 13.4Voluntary Dismissal 47
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Cypress Semiconduct, et al v. Integrated Circuit
1:01cv00199 16.6Voluntary Dismissal
Xicor Inc. v. Catalyst Semiconduct
1:01cv00256 14.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sandretto Industrie, et al v. Milacron Inc.
1:01cv00328 4.4Voluntary Dismissal
Integrated Device v. GSI Technology, et al
1:01cv00393 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
Photonetics Inc., et al v. New Focus Inc.
1:01cv00493 17.8Voluntary Dismissal
Outdoor Optics Inc. v. Bacou USA Inc.
1:01cv00533 5.1Voluntary Dismissal
ONDEO Nalco Company v. EKA Chemicals, Inc.
1:01cv00537 26.6Voluntary Dismissal
Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Medtronic Inc.
1:01cv00628 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Invitrogen v. Incyte Genomics Inc.
1:01cv00692 56.3Voluntary Dismissal
Nippon Carbon Co LTD v. Nucor Corporation
1:01cv00726 17.1Voluntary Dismissal
Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Par Pharmaceutical
1:01cv00835 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
Corning Lasertron v. Rockwell Intl Corp., et al
1:01cv00838 9.9Voluntary Dismissal
Matsushita Electric v. Cinram International, et al
1:01cv00882 30.8Voluntary Dismissal
CertCo Inc. v. PayPal Inc. 1:02cv00094 2.7Voluntary Dismissal
Pure Technologies v. Physical Acoustics
1:02cv00138 26.4Voluntary Dismissal
Rockwell Tech LLC v. Corning Inc., et al
1:02cv00338 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
Original Creatine v. Muscletech Research
1:02cv00366 29.3Voluntary Dismissal
ONDEO Nalco Company v. EKA Chemicals Inc.
1:02cv00467 17.0Voluntary Dismissal 48
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Sulzer Carbomedics
1:02cv00508 19.7Voluntary Dismissal
Inline Connection v. Verizon Comm Inc.
1:02cv00545 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Applied Separations v. Dionex Corporation
1:02cv01253 11.1Voluntary Dismissal
Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Alcon Laboratories
1:02cv01344 2.5Voluntary Dismissal
Original Creatine v. Optimum Nutrition
1:02cv01365 18.1Voluntary Dismissal
Pharmacia Corp., et al v. Allergan Inc., et al
1:02cv01381 2.7Voluntary Dismissal
National Steel Ltd. v. Greenbrier Companies, et al
1:02cv01427 20.2Voluntary Dismissal
Peer-To-Peer Systems v. Cybiko Inc.
1:02cv01465 14.8Voluntary Dismissal
Seikoh Giken Ltd., et al v. Domaille Engineering
1:02cv01483 14.4Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals
1:02cv01512 74.3Voluntary Dismissal
Symbol Technologies v. Hand Held Products, et al
1:03cv00102 24.8Voluntary Dismissal
Peer-To-Peer Systems v. Palm, Inc., et al
1:03cv00115 24.6Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories, et al v. Impax Laboratories
1:03cv00120 70.8Voluntary Dismissal
Honeywell Intl Inc, et al v. Electrolux Home, et al
1:03cv00183 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
NetRatings Inc. v. NPD Group Inc.
1:03cv00295 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
Lab Corp of America, et al v. Chiron Corporation
1:03cv00364 19.7Voluntary Dismissal
Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis Corporation
1:03cv00402 40.4Voluntary Dismissal
49
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Braintree Lab v. Schwarz Pharma Inc.
1:03cv00477 12.6Voluntary Dismissal
Whatman PLC v. Schuell Inc.
1:03cv00478 18.8Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecomm. v. SBC Communications, et al
1:03cv00526 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecomm. v. Qwest Comm Intl Inc., et al
1:03cv00527 19.2Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecomm. v. Verizon Comm., et al
1:03cv00528 14.3Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecomm. v. Broadwing Comm Serv., et al
1:03cv00531 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Intel Corporation v. Broadcom Corporation
1:03cv00726 1.3Voluntary Dismissal
Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Carbomedics Inc.
1:03cv00887 4.3Voluntary Dismissal
Guardian Industries v. Samsung Electronics, et al
1:03cv00934 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
Tenneco Automotive v. Visteon Corporation
1:03cv01030 21.2Voluntary Dismissal
Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al
1:03cv01138 40.8Voluntary Dismissal
KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & Devrient
1:04cv00021 12.3Voluntary Dismissal
Level 3 Comm LLC v. British Telecomm.
1:04cv00063 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
Guidant Corporation, et al v. St Jude Medical Inc., et al
1:04cv00067 41.0Voluntary Dismissal
Smithkline Beecham, et al v. Perrigo Company
1:04cv00107 12.9Voluntary Dismissal
Emulex Design, et al v. Qlogic Corporation
1:04cv00118 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al
1:04cv00228 7.6Voluntary Dismissal 50
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & Devrient
1:04cv00244 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al
1:04cv00269 7.1Voluntary Dismissal
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Cornice Inc.
1:04cv00418 21.8Voluntary Dismissal
Turn of the Century v. SIG Combibloc Inc.
1:04cv00424 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
LML Patent Corp. v. Telecheck Services, et al
1:04cv00858 20.7Voluntary Dismissal
McKesson Information v. Trizetto Group Inc.
1:04cv01258 24.0Voluntary Dismissal
BTG Intl Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., et al
1:04cv01264 21.7Voluntary Dismissal
Scieran Tech. Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb
1:04cv01319 15.2Voluntary Dismissal
Lancaster Composite v. Hardcore Composites, et al
1:04cv01414 27.3Voluntary Dismissal
BioPay LLC v. Solidus Networks Inc, et al
1:05cv00025 12.5Voluntary Dismissal
Hitachi Ltd. v. Borgwarner Inc., et al
1:05cv00048 26.1Voluntary Dismissal
Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Intermec Technologies Corporation
1:05cv00147 16.5Voluntary Dismissal
Turn of the Century Solution L.P. v. Federal Signal Corporation et al
1:05cv00158 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
SRU Biosystems Inc. v. Hobbs et al
1:05cv00201 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Mars Electronics International, Inc. et al v. International Currency Technologies Corp. et al
1:05cv00239 11.5Voluntary Dismissal
51
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Stratagene Corporation v. Third Wave Technologies Inc.
1:05cv00275 21.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alcatel USA Resources Inc. et al v. Foundry Networks Inc.
1:05cv00418 20.7Voluntary Dismissal
SEZ Holding AG et al v. Applied Materials Inc.
1:05cv00552 18.9Voluntary Dismissal
Hewlett-Packard Company v. SBC Laboratories Inc. et al
1:05cv00595 8.0Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Corporation v. Dell Inc. et al
1:05cv00633 46.8Voluntary Dismissal
Finisar Corporation v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1:05cv00653 10.3Voluntary Dismissal
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Conor Medsystems Inc.
1:05cv00768 18.9Voluntary Dismissal
Turn of the Century Solution L.P. v. International Rectifier Corporation
1:05cv00816 12.7Voluntary Dismissal
Thales Airborne Systems S.A. et al v. Universal Avionics Systems Corporation
1:05cv00853 15.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sentillion Inc. v. Carefx Corp.
1:06cv00013 12.0Voluntary Dismissal
Teles AG Informationstechnologien v. Quintum Technologies LLC.
1:06cv00197 43.2Voluntary Dismissal
Arcelor France v. Mittal Steel USA Inc.
1:06cv00307 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
1:06cv00316 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
52
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Tandberg Telecom AS v. Starbak Communications Inc.
1:06cv00424 3.2Voluntary Dismissal
Quinstreet Inc. v. Parallel Networks, LLC
1:06cv00495 40.9Voluntary Dismissal
ZymoGenetics Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
1:06cv00500 26.9Voluntary Dismissal
American Medical Systems Inc. et al v. Celsion Corporation
1:06cv00606 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Amberwave Systems Corporation v. Intel Corporation
1:06cv00638 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Applied Interact LLC et al
1:06cv00658 4.2Voluntary Dismissal
OSRAM GMBH et al v. Citizen Watch Co. Ltd. et al
1:06cv00710 7.9Voluntary Dismissal
USA Video Technolgy Corporation v. Time Warner Inc. et al
1:06cv00737 1.4Voluntary Dismissal
Polaroid Corporation v. Hewlett-Packard Company
1:06cv00738 22.7Voluntary Dismissal
Guardian Industries Corp. v. Innolux Display Corporation
1:06cv00748 24.1Voluntary Dismissal
Microsoft Corporation v. Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise et al
1:07cv00090 22.0Voluntary Dismissal
Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX International Inc.
1:07cv00137 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company
1:07cv00367 17.0Voluntary Dismissal
Interdigital Communications LLC et al v. Nokia Corporation et al
1:07cv00489 117.3Voluntary Dismissal
53
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Aisin Seiki Co Ltd. v. BorgWarner Inc. et al
1:07cv00512 6.6Voluntary Dismissal
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al
1:07cv00526 25.7Voluntary Dismissal
Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:07cv00549 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
Elan Corporation PLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:07cv00552 28.7Voluntary Dismissal
MAM Babyartikel GmbH et al v. Luv n' Care Ltd. et al
1:07cv00608 21.1Voluntary Dismissal
Cisco Systems Inc. et al v. GPNE Corp.
1:07cv00671 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
ArthroCare Corporation v. Gyrus Medical Inc. et al
1:07cv00729 25.7Voluntary Dismissal
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Sharp Corporation et al
1:07cv00843 26.0Voluntary Dismissal
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:08cv00065 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
1:08cv00112 26.4Voluntary Dismissal
Music Choice v. Viacom Inc. et al
1:08cv00130 15.1Voluntary Dismissal
Kwikset Corporation et al v. Master Lock LLC
1:08cv00170 16.5Voluntary Dismissal
JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al v. Affiliated Computer Services Inc. et al
1:08cv00189 22.2Voluntary Dismissal
CRS LLC v. Reflexive Entertainment Inc.
1:08cv00200 3.2Voluntary Dismissal
54
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Hilite International Inc. v. BorgWarner Inc. et al
1:08cv00287 11.9Voluntary Dismissal
Oxford Gene Technology IP Limited v. BioArray Solutions Ltd.
1:08cv00320 5.7Voluntary Dismissal
W. Neudorff GmbH KG v. Falcon Lab LLC
1:08cv00333 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Motivation Innovations LLC v. DSW Inc. et al
1:08cv00334 17.5Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00339 27.8Voluntary Dismissal
StreamServe AB v. Exstream Software LLC et al
1:08cv00343 19.4Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00455 27.8Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Corporation et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al
1:08cv00459 23.5Voluntary Dismissal
Wilco AG v. Packaging Technologies & Inspection LLC
1:08cv00635 19.1Voluntary Dismissal
NMT Medical Inc. et al v. W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.
1:08cv00790 14.4Voluntary Dismissal
Spansion LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
1:08cv00855 31.1Voluntary Dismissal
Infineon Technologies AG et al v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. et al
1:08cv00887 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc.
1:08cv00908 71.3Voluntary Dismissal
Eurand Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
1:09cv00018 21.1Voluntary Dismissal 55
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Farstone Technology Inc. et al
1:09cv00026 29.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:09cv00072 74.5Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecommunications plc v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
1:09cv00107 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
Acushnet Company v. Callaway Golf Company
1:09cv00130 37.8Voluntary Dismissal
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company
1:09cv00131 37.8Voluntary Dismissal
Stiefel Laboratories Inc. et al v. Cobrek Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00167 19.5Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecommunications plc v. Texas Instruments Incorporated
1:09cv00203 14.6Voluntary Dismissal
Eidos Communications LLC et al v. Skype Technologies SA et al
1:09cv00234 40.2Voluntary Dismissal
Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. CR Bard Inc. et al
1:09cv00264 35.1Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:09cv00291 17.6Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00292 18.1Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:09cv00294 18.3Voluntary Dismissal
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Apotex Corp. et al
1:09cv00304 23.0Voluntary Dismissal56
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Stiefel Laboratories Inc. v. KV Pharmaceutical Company
1:09cv00376 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corporation et al
1:09cv00389 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
BASF Plant Science GmbH et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. et al
1:09cv00392 7.5Voluntary Dismissal
Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. et al v. BASF Corporation et al
1:09cv00393 7.5Voluntary Dismissal
Synchrome Technology Inc. v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. et al
1:09cv00443 18.7Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al
1:09cv00499 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
Congoleum Corporation v. Tarkett Enterprises Inc. et al
1:09cv00522 10.0Voluntary Dismissal
Arbitron Inc. v. Digimarc Corporation
1:09cv00604 7.3Voluntary Dismissal
LadaTech LLC v. Illumina Inc.
1:09cv00627 35.3Voluntary Dismissal
Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
1:09cv00628 23.6Voluntary Dismissal
Congoleum Corporation v. Cryntel Enterprises Ltd. Inc.
1:09cv00631 7.9Voluntary Dismissal
Celgro Corporation v. Cambrex Corporation
1:09cv00639 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Ricoh Company LTD et al v. Oki Data Corporation et al
1:09cv00694 26.8Voluntary Dismissal
Ricoh Company Ltd. et al v. Oki Data Corporation et al
1:09cv00695 26.8Voluntary Dismissal 57
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation v. Infineon Technologies AG et al
1:09cv00739 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Congoleum Corporation v. Metroflor Corporation et al
1:09cv00757 5.7Voluntary Dismissal
BASF Catalysts LLC v. Johnson Matthey Inc et al
1:09cv00761 7.0Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00794 12.8Voluntary Dismissal
Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Maquet Inc. et al
1:09cv00811 13.5Voluntary Dismissal
Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. v. EON Corporation
1:09cv00823 4.2Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:09cv00841 21.1Voluntary Dismissal
Accenture Global Services GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc.
1:09cv00848 19.4Voluntary Dismissal
Sidergas SpA v. Lincoln Electric Company Inc. et al
1:09cv00905 6.9Voluntary Dismissal
Konarka Technologies Inc. et al
1:09cv00916 19.8Voluntary Dismissal
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:09cv00919 22.7Voluntary Dismissal
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Sharp Corporation et al
1:09cv00920 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Applied Interact LLC
1:09cv00941 21.2Voluntary Dismissal
LG Household & Healthcare Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Company
1:09cv00944 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
58
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
KANA Software Inc. v. Versata Enterprises Inc. et al
1:09cv00975 15.5Voluntary Dismissal
KANA Software Inc. v Versata Enterprises Inc. et al
1:09cv00982 15.5Voluntary Dismissal
Zodiac Pool Care Inc. v. Aquatron Inc. et al
1:10cv00016 23.4Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida
1:10cv00057 24.7Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
1:10cv00112 36.6Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:10cv00123 29.9Voluntary Dismissal
Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:10cv00127 15.6Voluntary Dismissal
Acceleron, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., et al
1:10cv00128 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. v. EON Corporation
1:10cv00179 8.0Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd et al
1:10cv00302 20.7Voluntary Dismissal
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Eurand Inc. et al
1:10cv00306 6.1Voluntary Dismissal
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Taro Pharmaceutical USA Inc. et al
1:10cv00359 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:10cv00373 21.4Voluntary Dismissal
Fox Ridge LLC v. L-1 Identity Solutions Inc.
1:10cv00395 18.1Voluntary Dismissal
59
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Salient Surgical Technologies Inc. et al v. Bovie Medical Corporation
1:10cv00494 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:10cv00538 33.0Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Mylan Inc. et al
1:10cv00559 21.7Voluntary Dismissal
British Telecommunications plc v. Coxcom Inc. et al
1:10cv00658 43.2Voluntary Dismissal
Minkus Electronic Display Systems Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks Inc. et al
1:10cv00666 20.3Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Corporation v. Hearst Newspapers LLC
1:10cv00690 24.9Voluntary Dismissal
Versata Software Inc. et al v. Callidus Software Inc.
1:10cv00781 17.7Voluntary Dismissal
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:10cv00800 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:10cv00801 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC. v. HTC Corporation et al
1:10cv00840 6.3Voluntary Dismissal
Marvell International Ltd. v. Link A Media Devices Corp
1:10cv00869 13.8Voluntary Dismissal
CSR plc v. Broadcom Corporation
1:10cv00876 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Everglades Interactive LLC v. Playfish Ltd et al
1:10cv00902 13.8Voluntary Dismissal
Triax Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Glenmark Generics Inc USA et al
1:10cv00946 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
60
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Graphics Properties Holdings Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al
1:10cv00992 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
1:10cv01029 21.6Voluntary Dismissal
Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc.
1:10cv01033 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
NetMonitor LLC v. Compuware Corporation et al
1:10cv01061 15.2Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al
1:10cv01066 22.1Voluntary Dismissal
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Apotex Corp. et al
1:11cv00012 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:11cv00023 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
Avago Technologies U S Inc. et al v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
1:11cv00071 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
Sharp Corporation v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
1:11cv00077 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. et al. v. Biogen Idec Inc. et al
1:11cv00084 36.3Voluntary Dismissal
SRI International Inc. v. Symantec Corporation
1:11cv00131 14.6Voluntary Dismissal
Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc.
1:11cv00173 35.1Voluntary Dismissal
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc.
1:11cv00167 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alloqate LLC v. DealBase Corporation et al
1:11cv00403 7.9Voluntary Dismissal61
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
1:11cv00239 9.5Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida
1:11cv00251 10.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al
1:11cv00255 17.4Voluntary Dismissal
Eurand Inc. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:11cv00268 28.1Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:11cv00281 8.9Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al
1:11cv00293 45.5Voluntary Dismissal
Resonant Biotechnologies LLC v. Corning Inc. et al
1:11cv00303 26.6Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v. Google Inc. et al.
1:11cv00309 46.6Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
1:11cv00315 23.1Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v Microsoft Corporation
1:11cv00322 33.1Voluntary Dismissal
W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. v. EMD Millipore Corporation
1:11cv00346 25.8Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:11cv00367 15.9Voluntary Dismissal
Crayola LLC v. C2C Technologies LLC
1:11cv00389 5.5Voluntary Dismissal
62
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:11cv00480 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
OSRAM GMBH v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
1:11cv00496 15.2Voluntary Dismissal
Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Taleo Corporation
1:11cv00517 1.3Voluntary Dismissal
Sudmo Holding GmbH v. SPX Corporation et al
1:11cv00561 57.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:11cv00587 27.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. HTC America Inc.
1:11cv00598 27.8Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida
1:11cv00607 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Samsung LED Co Ltd. v. OSRAM GmbH et al
1:11cv00630 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P. et al v. Hikma (Maple) Ltd. et al
1:11cv00695 12.0Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:11cv00712 4.7Voluntary Dismissal
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company v. Heraeus Precious Metals North America Conshohocken LLC
1:11cv00773 25.9Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Canon Inc. et al
1:11cv00792 51.9Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:11cv00821 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
1:11cv00827 29.2Voluntary Dismissal
63
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al
1:11cv00828 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Audiocodes Inc. et al
1:11cv00830 36.1Voluntary Dismissal
LVL Patent Group LLC v. Vlingo Corporation et al
1:11cv00832 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Vizio Inc. et al
1:11cv00833 35.4Voluntary Dismissal
Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Federal Express Corporation et al
1:11cv00834 33.3Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Echostar Technologies LLC et al
1:11cv00835 16.3Voluntary Dismissal
Comcast Cable Communications LLC et al v. British Telecommunications plc
1:11cv00843 29.8Voluntary Dismissal
Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc.
1:11cv00890 28.1Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. Alaska Air Group Inc.
1:11cv00967 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. Continental Airlines Inc.
1:11cv00968 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. Delta Airlines Inc.
1:11cv00969 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. United Airlines Inc.
1:11cv00970 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Sensus USA Inc. v. Nxegen LLC et al
1:11cv01000 32.7Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Nikon Corporation et al
1:11cv01025 42.8Voluntary Dismissal
64
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Teijin Limited et al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited
1:13cv01939 29.4Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al
1:11cv01098 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:11cv01113 34.1Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:11cv01119 16.4Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:11cv01186 8.6Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
1:11cv01190 14.7Voluntary Dismissal
Cequint Inc. v. Apple Inc. 1:11cv01224 17.3Voluntary Dismissal
Juniper Networks Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks Inc.
1:11cv01258 29.3Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. US Airways Group Inc. et al
1:11cv01267 24.4Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Cadila Healthcare Limited et al
1:12cv00065 18.8Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo Inc. v. Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv00070 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00074 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:12cv00103 31.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC
1:12cv00107 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Bright House Networks LLC
1:12cv00110 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
65
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cequel Communications LLC
1:12cv00109 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
1:12cv00111 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cable One Inc.
1:12cv00112 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al
1:12cv00113 6.5Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC
1:12cv00114 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Cox Communications Inc.
1:12cv00115 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Knology Inc.
1:12cv00116 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Insight Communications Company, Inc.
1:12cv00117 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. RCN Telecom Services LLC
1:12cv00118 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Mediacom Broadband LLC
1:12cv00119 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc.
1:12cv00120 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
YYZ LLC v Hewlett-Packard Company
1:12cv00168 11.6Voluntary Dismissal
YYZ LLC v Software AG Inc. et al.
1:12cv00169 11.7Voluntary Dismissal
YYZ LLC v TIBCO Software Inc.
1:12cv00170 10.7Voluntary Dismissal
Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc.
1:12cv00204 23.3Voluntary Dismissal
66
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
1:12cv00235 11.6Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00248 5.5Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Mylan Inc. et al
1:12cv00257 23.1Voluntary Dismissal
American Registry LLC v. Showmark Media LLC
1:12cv00262 11.8Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv00298 41.8Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv00301 41.7Voluntary Dismissal
Varia Holdings LLC v. Research in Motion Corporation et al
1:12cv00320 12.7Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida
1:12cv00324 17.9Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al
1:12cv00323 8.6Voluntary Dismissal
Acronis International GmbH et al v. Symantec Corporation
1:12cv00372 24.8Voluntary Dismissal
Video Streaming Solutions LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:12cv00401 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv00448 40.8Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Autodesk Inc.
1:12cv00452 20.3Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Nuance Communications Inc.
1:12cv00454 23.7Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Wolfram Research Inc.
1:12cv00455 27.9Voluntary Dismissal
67
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.
1:12cv00465 17.1Voluntary Dismissal
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
1:12cv00474 7.1Voluntary Dismissal
Rovi Corporation et al v. LG Electronics Inc. et al
1:12cv00545 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Rovi Corporation et al v. VIZIO Inc.
1:12cv00546 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Rovi Corporation et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. et al
1:12cv00547 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. Sandisk Corporation
1:12cv00569 34.8Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:12cv00595 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv00602 39.7Voluntary Dismissal
Trustco Bank v. Automated Transactions LLC
1:12cv00613 13.5Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. CISCO Systems Inc.
1:14cv00126 10.0Voluntary Dismissal
Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Henkel Corporation et al
1:12cv00650 27.7Voluntary Dismissal
Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. Akken Inc. et al
1:12cv00660 20.8Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:12cv00703 16.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. PulsePoint Inc.
1:12cv00774 10.9Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:12cv00809 25.1Voluntary Dismissal 68
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:12cv00808 25.5Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:12cv00810 24.1Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:12cv00811 25.0Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:12cv00812 25.3Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.
1:12cv00813 25.3Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:12cv00814 25.2Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. Florida et al
1:12cv00816 25.4Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Wockhardt Ltd. et al
1:12cv00817 23.6Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:12cv00818 25.5Voluntary Dismissal
Blue Sunny Skies LLC et al v. PV Thermal Solar LLC et al
1:12cv00829 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al
1:12cv00834 10.7Voluntary Dismissal
Tessera Inc. v. Amkor Technology Inc.
1:12cv00852 30.5Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Americold Logistics LLC
1:12cv00882 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Cost Plus Inc.
1:12cv00883 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
69
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Mobile Logistics LLC v. FedEx Freight Inc. et al
1:12cv00885 14.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC V. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
1:12cv00886 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Kraft Foods Global Inc.
1:12cv00887 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Marten Transport Ltd.
1:12cv00888 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC V. Nestle USA Inc.
1:12cv00889 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Supervalu Inc.
1:12cv00891 9.2Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Mattel Inc.
1:12cv00901 5.6Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Tissot USA Inc. et al
1:12cv00902 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Skullcandy Inc.
1:12cv00903 12.0Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Forevermark US Inc.
1:12cv00904 12.7Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Conde Nast Publications Inc. et al
1:12cv00905 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
Carrier Corporation v. Goodman Global Inc. et al
1:12cv00930 55.9Voluntary Dismissal
Versata Software Inc. et al v. Callidus Software Inc.
1:12cv00931 28.1Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:12cv00960 16.5Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:12cv00973 16.3Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv00999 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
70
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Activision TV, Inc. v. Adflow Health Networks Inc.
1:12cv01006 17.9Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV, Inc. v. National CineMedia LLC
1:12cv01009 23.5Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Arctic Express Inc.
1:12cv01012 1.6Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01014 36.9Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01036 36.7Voluntary Dismissal
Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
1:12cv01141 17.4Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Philadelphia Media Network LLC
1:12cv01194 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01200 35.3Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01201 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv01202 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
LED Tech Development LLC v. Coleman Company Inc.
1:12cv01259 11.9Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. ATM Systems Corporation
1:12cv01265 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Brother Industries Ltd. et al
1:12cv01266 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Canon Inc. et al
1:12cv01267 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
1:12cv01268 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al
1:12cv01269 15.4Voluntary Dismissal 71
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Konica Minolta Holdings Inc. et al
1:12cv01270 4.9Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Lexmark International Inc.
1:12cv01272 9.6Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Payment Alliance International Inc.
1:12cv01276 10.5Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al
1:12cv01277 12.2Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al
1:12cv01280 12.6Voluntary Dismissal
T5 Labs (Delaware) LLC v. Gaikai Inc.
1:12cv01281 18.2Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:12cv01300 34.9Voluntary Dismissal
LED Tech Development LLC v. Apple Inc.
1:12cv01316 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
LED Tech Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. et al
1:12cv01325 13.2Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Best Data Products Inc. et al
1:12cv01326 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Dell Inc.
1:12cv01327 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Hiro Inc.
1:12cv01328 15.1Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Multi-Tech Systems Inc.
1:12cv01331 13.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Socket Mobile Inc.
1:12cv01332 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TRENDnet Inc.
1:12cv01335 15.3Voluntary Dismissal
72
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. US Robotics Corporation
1:12cv01336 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Zoom Technologies Inc., et al.
1:12cv01337 15.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sprogis v. JVL Ventures LLC 1:12cv01352 9.4Voluntary Dismissal
Nestle Health Science - Pamlab Inc. et al v. Acella Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:12cv01403 11.1Voluntary Dismissal
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida
1:12cv01409 10.1Voluntary Dismissal
FastVDO LLC v. Paramount Pictures Corporation
1:12cv01427 20.3Voluntary Dismissal
LED Tech Development LLC v. Fujitsu America Inc. et al
1:12cv01443 14.9Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Beta Systems Software of North America Inc.
1:12cv01446 12.3Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Jericho Systems Corporation
1:12cv01449 8.1Voluntary Dismissal
Afluo LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. et al
1:12cv01459 32.2Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Axiomatics Inc.
1:12cv01463 5.1Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Fischer International Identity LLC
1:12cv01464 7.0Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Sailpoint Technologies Inc.
1:12cv01465 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Tools4Ever Inc.
1:12cv01466 7.3Voluntary Dismissal
73
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Nexans Inc. et al v. Belden Inc. et al
1:12cv01491 44.7Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. Virgin America Inc.
1:12cv01492 13.4Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Bayer Properties LLC
1:12cv01520 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Boulevard Invest LLC
1:12cv01521 14.2Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. CenterCal Properties LLC
1:12cv01522 14.1Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. General Growth Properties Inc.
1:12cv01523 17.0Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Irvine Company LLC
1:12cv01524 16.1Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. JJ Gumberg Co.
1:12cv01525 23.7Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Simon Property Group LP
1:12cv01528 19.9Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Madison Marquette Retail Services Inc. et al
1:12cv01527 20.6Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. VF Outlet Inc
1:12cv01531 14.3Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Westfield Concession Management LLC
1:12cv01532 17.0Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Macerich Partnership LP
1:12cv01571 16.8Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Short Hills Associates LLC et.al.
1:12cv01572 21.4Voluntary Dismissal
74
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. MOAC Mall Holdings LLC
1:12cv01573 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Vornado Realty LP
1:12cv01574 20.6Voluntary Dismissal
Cellectis S.A. v. Precision Biosciences Inc. et al
1:12cv01662 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.
1:12cv01669 9.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:12cv01673 17.3Voluntary Dismissal
Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:12cv01723 10.9Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv01724 20.1Voluntary Dismissal
Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC et al
1:12cv01725 1.3Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Spy Inc.
1:12cv01745 9.4Voluntary Dismissal
AeroScout Ltd. et al v. Centrak Inc.
1:12cv01747 12.8Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. MegaPath Inc.
1:12cv01767 22.5Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Windstream Corporation
1:12cv01769 15.0Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra USA Inc. et al
1:12cv01780 12.4Voluntary Dismissal
75
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation
1:12cv01782 14.9Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.
1:12cv01784 20.4Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc
1:12cv01787 9.6Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC
1:13cv00032 16.8Voluntary Dismissal
Charter Communications Inc. et al v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al
1:14cv00055 12.5Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Sears Holding Corporation
1:13cv01901 6.1Voluntary Dismissal
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Kobo Inc.
1:13cv01890 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:13cv00615 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Creative Technology Ltd. et al
1:14cv00250 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Braven LC
1:14cv00249 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:13cv01851 27.1Voluntary Dismissal
76
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Estech Systems Inc. v. Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC
1:13cv00067 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
1:13cv00134 22.0Voluntary Dismissal
YYZ LLC v. Software AG Inc. et al
1:13cv00137 20.4Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV, Inc. v. Wawa Inc.
1:13cv00153 9.9Voluntary Dismissal
Activelight Inc. v. Solohealth Inc.
1:13cv00167 13.7Voluntary Dismissal
Precision Biosciences Inc. et al v. Cellectis S.A. et al
1:13cv00247 11.4Voluntary Dismissal
Bosch Security Systems Inc. et al v. Criminal Activity Surveillance LLC
1:13cv00296 7.5Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV, Inc. v. Carmike Cinemas, Inc.
1:13cv00302 12.5Voluntary Dismissal
Jack Henry & Associates Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC
1:13cv00423 3.5Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. AOL Inc.
1:13cv00427 9.2Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting Company et al
1:13cv00431 24.9Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. DirecTV Group Inc
1:13cv00432 33.0Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CNN Interactive Group et al
1:13cv00434 22.2Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Univision Interactive Media Inc.
1:13cv00435 23.4Voluntary Dismissal77
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
FundsXpress Financial Network Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC
1:13cv00468 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Canon Inc. et al.
1:13cv00473 33.4Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al
1:13cv00474 45.7Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Southbridge Savings Bank et al
1:13cv00502 21.4Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Mascoma Savings Bank
1:13cv00503 21.4Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Northfield Savings Bank
1:13cv00504 19.1Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. New England Federal Credit Union
1:13cv00505 21.4Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Heritage Family Credit Union
1:13cv00506 21.5Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v Americold Logistics LLC
1:13cv00536 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc.
1:13cv00537 18.8Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Bath Savings Institution
1:13cv00582 21.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Winchester Co-Operative Bank
1:13cv00583 21.1Voluntary Dismissal78
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
YYZ LLC v. BMC Software Inc.
1:13cv00580 11.5Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Adams Community Bank
1:13cv00584 21.1Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Llewellyn-Edison Savings Bank
1:13cv00587 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Community Bank of Bergen County
1:13cv00588 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. New York Community Bank
1:13cv00591 5.6Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Stewart's Shops, Corp.
1:13cv00592 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Trustco Bank
1:13cv00593 2.6Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Dannemora Federal Credit Union
1:13cv00594 21.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Astoria Financial Corporation et al
1:13cv00595 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Sunoco, Inc. et al.
1:13cv00596 19.4Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. EMC Corporation
1:13cv00616 20.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company
1:13cv00617 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
1:13cv00618 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
79
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Data Speed Technology LLC v. LexisNexis Group
1:13cv00619 23.2Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
1:13cv00620 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Novell Inc.
1:13cv00621 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Oracle Corporation
1:13cv00622 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. World Software Corporation
1:13cv00623 18.4Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Xerox Corporation
1:13cv00624 21.7Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Zoho Corporation
1:13cv00625 17.2Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Open Text Inc.
1:13cv00689 11.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. SAP America Inc.
1:13cv00690 3.5Voluntary Dismissal
Precision Biosciences Inc. et al v. Lonza Group Ltd. et al
1:13cv00708 9.4Voluntary Dismissal
SRI International Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al
1:13cv00737 28.3Voluntary Dismissal
In re: Automated Transactions LLC - Patent Litigation
1:13md02429 23.2Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al
1:14cv00117 17.4Voluntary Dismissal
Arris Group Inc. et al v. Constellation Technologies LLC et al
1:14cv00114 12.1Voluntary Dismissal
IGT v. WMS Gaming Inc. 1:14cv00098 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Saba Software Inc.
1:14cv00037 17.1Voluntary Dismissal 80
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Perforce Software Inc.
1:14cv00036 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Intuit Inc.
1:14cv00034 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Egnyte Inc.
1:14cv00033 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Autodesk Inc.
1:14cv00032 12.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Micro Labs Limited et al
1:14cv00014 15.5Voluntary Dismissal
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Unum Group
1:14cv00006 38.6Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al
1:14cv00268 24.0Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Monoprice Inc.
1:14cv00255 6.8Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Harman International Industries Inc.
1:14cv00253 8.7Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. GN Netcom Inc.
1:14cv00252 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Boston Acoustics Inc.
1:14cv00248 10.0Voluntary Dismissal
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
1:14cv00003 38.8Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:13cv02086 26.3Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Gillette Company
1:13cv02084 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
81
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. AlertEnterprise Inc.
1:13cv02053 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Wockhardt Limited et al
1:13cv02040 10.6Voluntary Dismissal
Bockstar Technologies LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:13cv02020 15.6Voluntary Dismissal
Courtesy Products LLC v. Hamilton Beach Brands Inc.
1:13cv02012 37.9Voluntary Dismissal
Jernberg Dental LLC v. Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation et al
1:13cv01980 4.7Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC
1:13cv01893 24.3Voluntary Dismissal
WAND Corporation v. Activision TV Inc.
1:13cv01892 9.8Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Sun Pharma Global FZE et al
1:13cv01852 19.7Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:13cv01781 32.2Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., et al.
1:13cv01780 27.4Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Arby's Restaurant Group Inc.
1:13cv01759 6.6Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Wendy's International Inc.
1:13cv01758 9.1Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Smashburger Master LLC
1:13cv01757 8.8Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
1:13cv01737 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:13cv01729 30.4Voluntary Dismissal
82
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:13cv01604 31.6Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
1:13cv01603 26.7Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC
1:13cv01597 19.4Voluntary Dismissal
Device Security LLC v. Asurion LLC
1:13cv01478 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Strides Inc. et al
1:13cv00851 23.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC V Omni-ID Ltd.
1:13cv00905 4.4Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. News Distribution Network Inc.
1:13cv00963 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NextPoint Inc. et al
1:13cv00964 4.3Voluntary Dismissal
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Ustream Inc.
1:13cv00965 13.8Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al
1:13cv00989 18.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
1:13cv01049 1.7Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v Toshiba America Inc.
1:13cv01052 18.9Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc.
1:13cv01087 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
Ruckus Wireless Inc. v. Netgear Inc.
1:13cv01099 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:13cv01114 31.1Voluntary Dismissal
83
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
ImmerVision Inc. v. CBC Co. Ltd. et al
1:13cv01139 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alpex Pharma S A et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:13cv01143 16.9Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
1:13cv01192 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra USA Inc.
1:13cv01193 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation
1:13cv01194 8.6Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc.
1:13cv01195 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:13cv01230 8.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al
1:13cv01256 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al
1:13cv01257 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al
1:13cv01258 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
1:13cv01274 25.3Voluntary Dismissal
Aeritas LLC v. American Airlines Inc.
1:13cv01320 14.0Voluntary Dismissal
84
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:13cv01332 20.1Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v CDW Corporation
1:13cv01365 7.6Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Golf Warehouse Inc.
1:13cv01368 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. L.L. Bean Inc.
1:13cv01369 8.3Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. PetMed Express Inc.
1:13cv01372 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al
1:13cv01381 11.4Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Omni Hotels Management Corporation
1:13cv01395 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Alfresco Software Ltd et al
1:13cv01443 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Box Inc.
1:13cv01444 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Blackboard Inc.
1:13cv01445 4.9Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp.
1:13cv01447 10.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al
1:13cv01450 15.1Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. VMware Inc.
1:13cv01451 18.7Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Wolters Kluwer U.S. Corporation et al
1:13cv01452 18.7Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. CDL West 45th Street LLC
1:13cv01473 8.5Voluntary Dismissal 85
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Activelight Inc. v. KAH 20 2nd Avenue LLC
1:13cv01474 8.5Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. MGM Resorts International
1:13cv01523 11.5Voluntary Dismissal
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. et al
1:13cv01524 28.4Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises Inc.
1:13cv01545 8.5Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v Ranbaxy Inc. et al
1:13cv01607 14.8Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:13cv01613 17.0Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. First Time US Generics LLC
1:13cv01642 7.4Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. CBS Interactive Inc.
1:13cv01689 2.0Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Fox Broadcasting Company
1:13cv01690 13.5Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. New York Times Digital LLC
1:13cv01691 13.2Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Glenmark Generics Inc. USA et al
1:14cv00159 22.4Voluntary Dismissal
Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd et al.
1:14cv00160 12.8Voluntary Dismissal
Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al.
1:14cv00161 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
86
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Teijin Limited et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
1:14cv00166 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:14cv00184 24.3Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.
1:14cv00189 27.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Beats Electronics LLC
1:14cv00190 7.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. JWIN Electronics Corp.
1:14cv00191 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. SDI Technologies Inc.
1:14cv00192 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Yamaha Corporation of America
1:14cv00193 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Parrot SA, et al.
1:14cv00195 8.3Voluntary Dismissal
Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. et al
1:14cv00270 13.6Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Speedy Cash
1:14cv00280 12.2Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Goathead Saloon-AAA ATMS
1:14cv00281 12.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Imation Corporation
1:14cv00285 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Klipsch Group Inc.
1:14cv00286 9.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Spectra Merchandising International Inc.
1:14cv00287 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc.
1:14cv00340 7.1Voluntary Dismissal
87
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. EMC Corporation
1:14cv00341 12.8Voluntary Dismissal
Interface IP Holdings LLC v. Open Text Corporation
1:14cv00370 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Amount Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:14cv00390 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
Spherix Incorporated v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:14cv00393 20.2Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Oracle Corporation
1:14cv00403 6.8Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Reed Elsevier Group plc et al
1:14cv00404 16.8Voluntary Dismissal
Intercap Capital Partners LLC v. BuildingIQ Inc.
1:14cv00417 6.1Voluntary Dismissal
GPNE Corp. v. BP America Inc.
1:14cv00419 2.2Voluntary Dismissal
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
1:14cv00425 24.8Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Monster Worldwide Inc.
1:14cv00434 7.4Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al
1:14cv00447 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Linkedin Corporation
1:14cv00462 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
1:14cv00506 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
88
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Certainteed Corporation v. Owens Corning
1:14cv00510 24.9Voluntary Dismissal
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. General Electric Capital Corporation
1:14cv00529 24.1Voluntary Dismissal
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. TradeKing Group, Inc.
1:14cv00530 24.1Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Google Inc.
1:14cv00534 6.5Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company
1:14cv00535 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. Polar Electro Inc. USA
1:14cv00553 10.7Voluntary Dismissal
SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. Withings Inc.
1:14cv00554 10.7Voluntary Dismissal
CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 18.7Voluntary Dismissal
Proximity Monitoring Innovations LLC v Voxx Electronics Corp. et al
1:14cv00577 9.0Voluntary Dismissal
Spherix Incorporated et al. v. Juniper Networks Inc.
1:14cv00578 19.1Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Amazon Inc.
1:14cv00618 8.9Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Canon Inc. et al
1:14cv00619 5.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
1:14cv00647 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Cavium Inc.
1:14cv00652 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. DirecTV, et al.
1:14cv00676 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
89
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Yamaha Corporation of America
1:14cv00702 8.3Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Diebold Incorporated
1:14cv00703 8.5Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. NCR Corporation
1:14cv00704 14.9Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Brother Industries Ltd. et al
1:14cv00729 8.0Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. CFT Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:14cv00781 14.8Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Xerox Corporation
1:14cv00782 15.2Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.
1:14cv00787 14.4Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:14cv00854 16.4Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Asus Computer International
1:14cv00855 9.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Buffalo Americas Inc. et al.
1:14cv00856 8.6Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Memorex Products Inc. et al
1:14cv00858 7.6Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al
1:14cv00859 8.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., et al.
1:14cv00860 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Plextor LLC, et al.
1:14cv00861 5.6Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Sony Optiarc America Inc., et al.
1:14cv00862 8.6Voluntary Dismissal
90
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Pixion Inc. v. Blackboard Inc.
1:14cv00865 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al
1:14cv00872 14.7Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
1:14cv00894 15.8Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
1:14cv00895 15.8Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group LLC
1:14cv00896 18.1Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Cable One Inc.
1:14cv00897 18.1Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC
1:14cv00898 14.6Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. CenturyLink Communications LLC
1:14cv00899 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Sprint Corporation
1:14cv00901 16.0Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. T-Mobile US Inc.
1:14cv00902 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. United States Cellular Corporation
1:14cv00903 20.9Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. WideOpenWest Finance LLC
1:14cv00904 21.9Voluntary Dismissal
91
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Actavis Inc. et al
1:14cv00912 24.2Voluntary Dismissal
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Actavis Inc. et al
1:14cv00923 9.3Voluntary Dismissal
Pixion Inc. v. Saba Software Inc.
1:14cv00953 10.1Voluntary Dismissal
Kowa Company Ltd et al v. Sawai USA Inc. et al
1:14cv00978 6.9Voluntary Dismissal
Daravita Limited v. Sun Pharma Global FZE et al
1:14cv00986 4.9Voluntary Dismissal
Pixion Inc. v. FuzeBox Software Corporation
1:14cv00992 3.5Voluntary Dismissal
Pixion Inc. v. BigBlueButton Inc. et al.
1:14cv00993 17.5Voluntary Dismissal
Pixion Inc. v. Start Meeting LLC
1:14cv00994 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. et al
1:14cv01028 5.9Voluntary Dismissal
Corning Inc. v. DSM Desotech Inc. et al
1:14cv01081 16.5Voluntary Dismissal
Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Aptina (U.S.) Inc. et al
1:14cv01093 13.9Voluntary Dismissal
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Micro Labs Limited et al
1:14cv01105 7.9Voluntary Dismissal
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
1:14cv01227 24.6Voluntary Dismissal
Kowa Company Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:14cv01264 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC vs. Viacom, Inc.
1:14cv01293 6.8Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC vs. MLB Advanced Media L.P.
1:14cv01294 14.6Voluntary Dismissal
92
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Preservation Technologies LLC vs. NFL Enterprises LLC
1:14cv01295 17.9Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v Vevo LLC
1:14cv01296 10.1Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v World Wrestling Entertainment Inc.
1:14cv01297 14.6Voluntary Dismissal
Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc.
1:14cv01337 6.2Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Unimark Remedies Ltd.
1:14cv01370 14.0Voluntary Dismissal
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
1:14cv01410 22.9Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. Canon Inc. et al
1:14cv01457 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. JVC Kenwood Corp. et al
1:14cv01458 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
1:14cv01462 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al
1:14cv01491 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Vite Technologies LLC v. Arthrex Inc.
1:14cv01506 26.5Voluntary Dismissal
Vite Technologies LLC v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
1:14cv01507 26.5Voluntary Dismissal
iCeutica Pty Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:14cv01515 25.6Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc et al v. Mylan Laboratories Limited
1:15cv00026 23.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Koss Corporation
1:15cv00085 5.1Voluntary Dismissal 93
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Media Bridge LLC v. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. et al.
1:15cv00122 11.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Plantronics Inc.
1:15cv00143 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Polk Audio LLC et al
1:15cv00144 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al
1:15cv00157 16.5Voluntary Dismissal
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
1:15cv00192 19.5Voluntary Dismissal
Draeger Medical Systems Inc. v. My Health Inc.
1:15cv00248 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA LLC
1:15cv00355 21.0Voluntary Dismissal
Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:15cv00385 14.1Voluntary Dismissal
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Roadmaster, Inc.
1:15cv00398 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
1:15cv00446 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
1:15cv00447 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Teijin Limited et al v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
1:15cv00454 8.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Akorn Inc.
1:15cv00479 1.8Voluntary Dismissal
Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:15cv00486 7.5Voluntary Dismissal
94
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Spherix Incorporated
1:15cv00559 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
R-Tech Ueno, Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc. et al
1:15cv00592 10.2Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd. et al
1:15cv00621 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Scientific Telecommunications LLC v. Adtran Inc.
1:15cv00647 21.2Voluntary Dismissal
Allergan, Inc. v. InnoPharma, Inc. et al
1:15cv00815 1.6Voluntary Dismissal
Spherix Incorporated v. Verizon Services Corp. et al
1:15cv00869 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Litera Technologies LLC v. DocsCorp LLC
1:15cv00923 17.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al v. Akorn, Inc.
1:15cv00948 0.8Voluntary Dismissal
Novanta Corporation v. Iradion Laser, Inc.
1:15cv01033 16.4Voluntary Dismissal
Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.
1:15cv01039 2.5Voluntary Dismissal
Cephalon, Inc. et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
1:15cv01074 9.1Voluntary Dismissal
Segway Inc. et al v. Razor USA LLC
1:15cv01197 15.9Voluntary Dismissal
Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:16cv00123 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al
1:16cv00248 9.3Voluntary Dismissal
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. LinkedIn Corp.
1:16cv00497 6.9Voluntary Dismissal
95
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Sound View Innovations LLC v. Twitter Inc.
1:16cv00652 5.7Voluntary Dismissal
NM, LLC et al v. Quikrete Companies, LLC
1:16cv00814 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Aptalis Pharma Canada ULC et al v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
1:16cv01069 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Fit4D, Inc. v. My Health, Inc. 1:16cv01076 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Henkel Corporation v. Oakite Products Inc.
1:00cv00576 13.1Voluntary Dismissal
Edwards Lifesciences, et al v. Medtronic Inc.
1:01cv00142 8.9Voluntary Dismissal
Mallinckrodt Inc., et al v. Maxtec Inc., et al
1:01cv00219 4.2Voluntary Dismissal
Syngenta Crop v. Bayer AG 1:01cv00317 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Aventis Pharma Prod., et al v. Introgen Thera Inc.
1:01cv00451 9.4Voluntary Dismissal
Armstrong World, et al v. Mannington Mills Inc
1:02cv00270 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
TA Instruments, Inc., et al v. Perkinelmer Inc.
1:02cv00313 5.6Voluntary Dismissal
Digimarc Corporation v. Spectra Systems
1:02cv01573 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical
1:03cv00347 2.2Voluntary Dismissal
Campbell Mfg v. American Granby Inc.
1:03cv01048 8.5Voluntary Dismissal
UD Technology Corp. v. Global Solar Energy, et al
1:04cv00025 0.7Voluntary Dismissal
Cooper Cameron Corp. v. FMC Technologies
1:04cv00054 2.5Voluntary Dismissal
Advanced Video v. Cirrus Logic, Inc.
1:04cv00194 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Cooper Cameron Corporation v. Dril-Quip, Inc.
1:05cv00188 11.0Voluntary Dismissal 96
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Novo Nordisk A/S v. Sanofi-Aventis et al
1:05cv00645 25.9Voluntary Dismissal
Stabler Companies Inc. et al v. Scientex Corporation
1:05cv00681 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Tokai Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. Volkswagen of America Inc. et al
1:05cv00727 12.9Voluntary Dismissal
Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. YDI Wireless Inc. et al
1:05cv00755 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion Wireless Inc.
1:05cv00889 0.8Voluntary Dismissal
Secure Elements Inc. v. Citadel Security Software Inc.
1:06cv00098 31.1Voluntary Dismissal
Avago Technologies General IP Pte Ltd et al v. Finisar Corporation
1:06cv00115 0.3Voluntary Dismissal
Syngenta Seeds Inc. et al v. DeKalb Genetics Corporation
1:06cv00622 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Interlink Electronics Inc. v. Nintendo of America
1:06cv00732 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Celgene Corporation et al v. Abrika Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:06cv00741 7.4Voluntary Dismissal
Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Tennrich International Corporation
1:06cv00752 2.5Voluntary Dismissal
Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Shieldex Trading Gmbh
1:06cv00754 13.3Voluntary Dismissal
Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. et al v. DeKalb Genetics Corporation et al
1:07cv00038 9.1Voluntary Dismissal
Optium Corporation v. Emcore Corporation et al
1:07cv00150 9.7Voluntary Dismissal97
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Renesas Technology Corp. et al
1:07cv00251 11.9Voluntary Dismissal
Girafa.com Inc. v. Amazon Web Services LLC et al
1:07cv00787 33.1Voluntary Dismissal
Janssen L P et al v. KV Pharmaceutical Company
1:07cv00825 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
Fifth Market Inc. v. CME Group Inc. et al
1:07cv00840 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
Miller v. Durney et al 1:08cv00068 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Edgecraft Corporation v. Luckyman Enterprise Co. Ltd.
1:08cv00267 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Streamlight, Inc. v. Sportsmans Guide, Inc.
1:17cv00037 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
Channel Intelligence Inc. v. SBSH Mobile Software Ltd. et al
1:08cv00437 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Channel Intelligence Inc. v. Lemonade Inc. et al
1:08cv00438 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Janssen Pharmaceutica N V et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:08cv00511 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
DVDPlay Inc. v. Redbox Automated Retail LLC
1:08cv00803 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Pylon Manufacturing Corp v. Jamak Fabrication-Tex LLC
1:09cv00063 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
Picsel (Research) Ltd. et al v. Apple Inc.
1:09cv00100 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Mr. Bar-B-Q- Inc. v. Belk Inc. 1:09cv00259 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Tandberg Inc. v. Multimedia Patent Trust
1:09cv00456 9.2Voluntary Dismissal
Verizon Communications Inc. et al v. Cablevision Systems Corp.
1:10cv00216 28.9Voluntary Dismissal
98
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited et al
1:10cv00474 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Daikin Industries Ltd v. Arkema SA et al
1:10cv00535 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
KV Pharmaceutical Company et al v. Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
1:10cv00641 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al
1:10cv00659 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Apotex Corp. et al
1:10cv00916 10.4Voluntary Dismissal
Everglades Interactive LLC v. Winster Inc. et al
1:10cv01052 9.6Voluntary Dismissal
AU Optronics Corporation et al v. Sharp Corporation et al
1:11cv00180 1.8Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v. Facebook Inc. et al
1:11cv00434 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Seiko Epson Corporation v. Giantplus Technology, Co., Ltd. et al
1:11cv00296 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v. BuyWithMe Inc. et al
1:11cv00317 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Sharing Sound LLC v. Audio and Video Labs, Inc. et al
1:11cv00349 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
Walker Digital LLC v. Google Inc.
1:11cv00361 2.0Voluntary Dismissal
Tessenderlo Kerley Inc. v. Purfresh Inc.
1:11cv00506 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Butamax(TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:11cv00697 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
99
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Appriss Inc. v. Information Strategies Inc.
1:11cv00719 6.2Voluntary Dismissal
Hot Headz International Inc. et al v. The Bridge Direct Inc.
1:11cv00746 16.0Voluntary Dismissal
Digital CBT LLC v. TiVo Inc. 1:11cv00917 5.5Voluntary Dismissal
Echopharm USA LLC v. Ralco Nutrition Inc.
1:11cv01042 1.0Voluntary Dismissal
YYZ LLC v Fujitsu America Inc. et al.
1:12cv00167 8.7Voluntary Dismissal
Pfizer Inc. et al v. McNeil-PPC Inc.
1:12cv00261 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
1:12cv00451 27.8Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Mathworks Inc.
1:12cv00453 2.7Voluntary Dismissal
Terez v. Audience Corporation
1:12cv00539 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. Vocus Inc.
1:12cv00543 4.9Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. Implix USA INC.
1:12cv00576 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
1:12cv00596 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Roxane Laboratories INC.
1:12cv00644 0.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. VerticalResponse Inc.
1:12cv00705 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Recognicorp LLC v. Oakley Capital Private Equity et al
1:12cv00844 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
100
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Dimension Trucking Services Inc.
1:12cv00884 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Shaw Industries Inc.
1:12cv00890 0.7Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Transfreight LLC
1:12cv00892 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Lennon Image Technologies LLC v. Boucheron Joaillerie USA Inc.
1:12cv00900 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. Direct IQ LLC
1:12cv00967 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Penske Logistics LLC
1:12cv01002 11.2Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV, Inc. v. Adspace Networks Inc.
1:12cv01007 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV, Inc. v. E-Cast Inc.
1:12cv01008 16.3Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. SkyMall Inc.
1:12cv01016 13.8Voluntary Dismissal
lululemon athletica canada inc. v. Calvin Klein Inc. et al
1:12cv01034 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Iconix Brand Group Inc.
1:12cv01095 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. E.W. Scripps Company
1:12cv01192 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Times Publishing Company
1:12cv01195 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
LED Tech Development LLC v. Home Depot USA Inc.
1:12cv01260 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
101
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Kyocera Document Solutions Inc. et al
1:12cv01271 4.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. NEC Corporation et al
1:12cv01273 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. OKI Electric Industry Co. Ltd. et al
1:12cv01274 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al
1:12cv01275 15.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
1:12cv01278 4.3Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Sharp Corporation et al
1:12cv01279 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. IC Intracom USA LLC et al
1:12cv01329 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Lantronix Inc.
1:12cv01330 5.7Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd, et al.
1:12cv01334 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
Sprogis v. Google Inc. 1:12cv01351 8.9Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. New York Times Company
1:12cv01408 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Aegis USA Inc.
1:12cv01444 1.0Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Allen Systems Group, Inc.
1:12cv01445 7.0Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Courion Corporation
1:12cv01447 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
102
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Evidian Systems Inc.
1:12cv01448 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Simeio Solutions LLC
1:12cv01450 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Symplified Inc.
1:12cv01451 8.1Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Just Fabulous Inc.
1:12cv01486 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Lerner Corporation
1:12cv01526 9.7Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Tarragon LLC
1:12cv01529 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Urban Retail Properties LLC
1:12cv01530 24.3Voluntary Dismissal
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Glimcher Colonial Park Mall, Inc., et al.
1:12cv01570 9.5Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. D.B. Solutions Inc.
1:12cv01763 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Getnet Inc.
1:12cv01764 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. InReach Internet Inc.
1:12cv01765 7.5Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. LinkLine Communications Inc.
1:12cv01766 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
103
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. O.T.T. Communications Incorporated
1:12cv01768 1.7Voluntary Dismissal
Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Simbionix LTD. et al
1:12cv01776 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. CAE Healthcare USA Inc. et al
1:12cv01777 8.3Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel Lucent USA Inc.
1:12cv01781 6.3Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Barracuda Networks Inc.
1:12cv01783 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Grandstream Networks Inc.
1:12cv01785 9.1Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Mitel Networks Inc.
1:12cv01786 4.7Voluntary Dismissal
Genetic Technologies Limited v. General Genetics Corporation
1:13cv00055 6.5Voluntary Dismissal
Effective Exploration LLC v. Whiting Oil and Gas Corp.
1:14cv00227 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
Effective Exploration LLC v. Petro-Hunt LLC
1:14cv00226 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
Effective Exploration LLC v. EOG Resources Inc.
1:14cv00221 3.6Voluntary Dismissal 104
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Centrify Corporation
1:13cv01850 7.9Voluntary Dismissal
Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
1:13cv01830 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. ShoeDazzle.com Inc.
1:13cv00065 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Empire One Telecommunications Inc.
1:13cv00108 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. PR Newswire Association LLC
1:13cv00109 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. eMinor Inc.
1:13cv00142 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Shop It To Me Inc.
1:13cv00221 2.7Voluntary Dismissal
North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.
1:16cv01182 1.4Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. ABN Newswire LLC
1:13cv00246 12.5Voluntary Dismissal
Apicore US LLC v. Pfizer Inc.
1:16cv01174 0.5Voluntary Dismissal
Fidelity National Information Services Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC
1:13cv00426 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Inc.
1:13cv00529 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. The Gap Inc.
1:13cv00534 4.7Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Safeway Inc.
1:13cv00535 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
105
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Beachmint Inc.
1:13cv00556 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Bogota Savings Bank
1:13cv00586 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Enterprise National Bank
1:13cv00589 0.2Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. First Bank
1:13cv00590 21.2Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Buffalo Service Credit Union
1:13cv00597 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Automated Transactions LLC v. Buffalo Community Federal Credit Union
1:13cv00598 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. Business Wire Inc.
1:13cv00755 2.1Voluntary Dismissal
Orientview Technologies LLC v. Hat World Corporation
1:13cv01068 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Alcorn Communications LLC v. Constant Contact Inc.
1:13cv01046 1.0Voluntary Dismissal
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. MasterCard Incorporated
1:14cv00089 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. MindJet LLC
1:14cv00035 2.6Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Logitech Inc.
1:14cv00254 3.5Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc.
1:14cv00251 0.8Voluntary Dismissal
Effective Exploration LLC v. Petro Harvester Operating Company LLC
1:14cv00225 3.2Voluntary Dismissal
106
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Effective Exploration LLC v. Murex Petroleum Corp.
1:14cv00224 4.9Voluntary Dismissal
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Huhtamaki Americas Inc.
1:14cv00005 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Dillard's Inc.
1:14cv00004 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Agiliance Inc.
1:13cv02054 7.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corporation
1:13cv02028 2.0Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Honeywell International Inc.
1:13cv02027 2.7Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. CafePress Inc.
1:13cv01711 1.6Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. American Apparel Inc.
1:13cv01710 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Aeropostale Inc.
1:13cv01709 0.2Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Quantumdigital Inc.
1:13cv00818 1.8Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Atlas RFID Holdings Inc., et al
1:13cv00899 2.0Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v Confidex Inc.
1:13cv00900 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Intelleflex Corporation
1:13cv00902 3.3Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. International Audio Visual Inc.
1:13cv00903 1.4Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Fluensee Inc.
1:13cv00901 3.0Voluntary Dismissal 107
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Mobile Logistics LLC v Motorola Solutions Inc.
1:13cv00904 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
Mobile Logistics LLC v RedPrairie Corp.
1:13cv00906 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ingenico S.A. et al
1:13cv00907 8.1Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Equinox Payments LLC
1:13cv00908 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Verifone Systems Inc.
1:13cv00909 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Harley-Davidson Inc.
1:13cv00981 10.0Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. CSG Systems Inc.
1:13cv00982 10.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Canon U.S.A. Inc.
1:13cv01050 1.5Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Fujitsu America Inc.
1:13cv01051 1.5Voluntary Dismissal
Security Technology LLC v. Asurion LLC
1:13cv01140 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America Inc.
1:13cv01201 8.8Voluntary Dismissal
KeySee Software Ltd. v. Verint Systems Inc.
1:13cv01233 4.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. ATM Systems
1:13cv01249 8.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al
1:13cv01250 10.1Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Equinox Payments LLC
1:13cv01251 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Dell Inc.
1:13cv01253 9.6Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
1:13cv01252 7.8Voluntary Dismissal
108
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Hiro Inc.
1:13cv01254 8.2Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Ingenico S.A. et al
1:13cv01255 10.5Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd et al.
1:13cv01259 8.4Voluntary Dismissal
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. TRENDnet Inc.
1:13cv01260 7.7Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Nevada Property 1 LLC
1:13cv01360 10.8Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v Avon Products Inc.
1:13cv01364 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Fanatics Inc.
1:13cv01366 0.7Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
1:13cv01367 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Office Depot Inc.
1:13cv01370 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. OfficeMax North America Inc.
1:13cv01371 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Eclipse IP LLC v. Sears Holdings Corporation
1:13cv01373 1.5Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Colbea Enterprises LLC
1:13cv01388 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Tri Star Energy LLC
1:13cv01389 5.2Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. Gulf Oil Limited Partnership
1:13cv01396 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Cincom Systems Inc.
1:13cv01446 5.0Voluntary Dismissal
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Document Logistix Ltd. et al
1:13cv01448 18.3Voluntary Dismissal
109
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Fiserv Inc. et al
1:13cv01449 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Activision TV Inc. v. White Castle Management Co.
1:13cv01472 12.3Voluntary Dismissal
Activelight Inc. v. Cosi Inc. 1:13cv01471 12.3Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. Provide Commerce Inc.
1:13cv01546 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Computer Software Protection LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
1:13cv01638 7.0Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Target Brands Inc.
1:13cv01692 0.2Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Vimeo LLC
1:13cv01693 0.2Voluntary Dismissal
ORG Structure Innovations LLC v. Jamcracker Inc.
1:13cv01902 7.3Voluntary Dismissal
Effective Exploration LLC v. Newfield Exploration Company
1:14cv00140 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
Speed Monitoring Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC
1:14cv00345 4.7Voluntary Dismissal
Speed Monitoring Technologies LLC v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC
1:14cv00346 5.5Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. AARP Services Inc.
1:14cv00347 6.4Voluntary Dismissal
Spherix Incorporated v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:14cv00374 0.6Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Open Text Corporation et al
1:14cv00402 3.1Voluntary Dismissal
110
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. TD Bank National Association
1:14cv00528 2.6Voluntary Dismissal
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. SunTrust Banks Inc. et al
1:14cv00531 1.4Voluntary Dismissal
Selene Communication Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
1:14cv00537 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
MasterCard Incorporated v. Open Network Solutions Inc.
1:14cv00603 4.6Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc.
1:14cv00620 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
1:14cv00621 5.8Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH, et al.
1:14cv00650 3.7Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Advanced Digital Broadcast Holdings SA
1:14cv00651 4.3Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al.
1:14cv00653 5.5Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V., et al.
1:14cv00674 1.9Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Nautilus Hyosung America Inc.
1:14cv00675 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. Hisense Company Ltd. et al
1:14cv00701 8.1Voluntary Dismissal
Open Network Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation et al
1:14cv00831 4.1Voluntary Dismissal111
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Sequent Data LLC v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea Inc. et al.
1:14cv00857 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, et al.
1:14cv00863 11.5Voluntary Dismissal
Sequent Data LLC v. Verbatim Americas LLC, et al.
1:14cv00864 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Network Congestion Solutions LLC v. Mediacom Communications Corporation
1:14cv00900 2.3Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al
1:14cv00930 2.6Voluntary Dismissal
Recordati Rare Diseases Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLC et al
1:14cv00956 1.6Voluntary Dismissal
Activelight Inc. v. GoGo Media Networks Inc.
1:14cv00965 0.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al
1:14cv00970 6.0Voluntary Dismissal
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. VIVUS Inc.
1:14cv01088 0.1Voluntary Dismissal
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Mindgeek USA Incorporated
1:14cv01292 3.8Voluntary Dismissal
Agiliance Inc. v. Telos Corporation
1:14cv01327 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. PCI of Virginia LLC
1:14cv01378 18.2Voluntary Dismissal
Round Rock Research LLC v. SanDisk Corp.
1:14cv01456 3.7Voluntary Dismissal 112
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:14cv01474 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Quest Integrity USA LLC v. A Hak Industrial Services US LLC
1:14cv01481 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corp. et al
1:14cv01490 11.0Voluntary Dismissal
Treehouse Avatar Technologies Inc. v. Snail Games USA Inc.
1:14cv01534 1.1Voluntary Dismissal
Horizon Pharma Ireland Limited et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al
1:15cv00043 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:15cv00048 3.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Belkin International Inc.
1:15cv00069 4.8Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Monster Inc.
1:15cv00070 4.1Voluntary Dismissal
B Therapy LLC v. SenoRX Inc. et al.
1:15cv00082 2.0Voluntary Dismissal
B Therapy LLC v. Varian Medical Systems Inc.
1:15cv00083 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
B Therapy LLC v. Xoft Inc. et al.
1:15cv00084 1.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Circus World Display Ltd.
1:15cv00086 11.8Voluntary Dismissal
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al
1:15cv00087 4.4Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Pioneer Corporation et al.
1:15cv00118 3.2Voluntary Dismissal 113
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al.
1:15cv00119 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Medac Pharma Inc. et al v. Antares Pharma Inc.
1:15cv00120 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
Media Bridge LLC v. Thinaire Transmedia Network Inc.
1:15cv00123 7.2Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v Velodyne Acoustics Inc.
1:15cv00145 6.7Voluntary Dismissal
B Therapy LLC v. Best Medical International Inc.
1:15cv00167 1.3Voluntary Dismissal
Gilead Sciences Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al
1:15cv00289 0.9Voluntary Dismissal
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. E&S International Enterprises Inc. et al
1:15cv00308 1.3Voluntary Dismissal
Telescope Time LLC v. Wevideo Inc.
1:15cv00322 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
Blackbird Tech LLC v. AP Products Inc.
1:15cv00396 4.2Voluntary Dismissal
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation
1:15cv00397 4.2Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. General Nutrition Investment Company et al
1:15cv00455 2.5Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Select Comfort Corporation
1:15cv00457 2.2Voluntary Dismissal
GovX, Inc. v. Shipping and Transit LLC
1:15cv00605 4.5Voluntary Dismissal
Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation et al
1:15cv00608 6.9Voluntary Dismissal 114
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Janssen Biotech Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al
1:15cv00679 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Collabo Innovations Inc. v. Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. et al
1:15cv00783 5.3Voluntary Dismissal
Sage Labs Inc. v. Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals Inc.
1:15cv00791 2.4Voluntary Dismissal
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Cuisinarts Corporation et al
1:15cv00826 1.4Voluntary Dismissal
CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina et al v. Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd.
1:15cv00837 3.2Voluntary Dismissal
North Star Innovations Inc. v. Arkadin Inc. et al
1:15cv01105 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
North Star Innovations Inc. v. Polycom Inc.
1:15cv01106 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
North Star Innovations Inc. v. Vidyo, Inc.
1:15cv01107 5.4Voluntary Dismissal
UCB, Inc. v. Alza Corporation
1:15cv01192 3.9Voluntary Dismissal
6115187 Canada Inc. v. Samsung Techwin America et al
1:16cv00002 6.8Voluntary Dismissal
Lux Products Corp. v. Elementi Moderni, LLC
1:16cv00012 3.6Voluntary Dismissal
IP Communication Solutions, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
1:16cv00147 2.8Voluntary Dismissal
Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
1:16cv00167 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
North Star Innovations Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
1:16cv00446 1.9Voluntary Dismissal 115
Voluntary Dismissal
There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
2930
3132
3334
3536
3738
3940
4142
4344
4546
4749
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Voluntary Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
PRO Orthopedic Devices, Inc. v. Ortho Equine LLC
1:16cv00457 1.7Voluntary Dismissal
Segway Inc. et al v. Shenzhen Chenduoxing Electronic Technology Ltd., China
1:16cv00535 7.7Voluntary Dismissal
Segway Inc. et al v. Nanjing Fastwheel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
1:16cv00536 7.7Voluntary Dismissal
Segway Inc. et al v. Hovershop
1:16cv00537 7.7Voluntary Dismissal
Segway Inc. et al v. PhunkeeDuck, Inc.,
1:16cv00539 7.7Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al v. Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:16cv00563 3.4Voluntary Dismissal
HID Global Corporation et al v. ICEPAT AG et al
1:16cv00597 5.1Voluntary Dismissal
Human Design Medical, LLC v. My Health, Inc.
1:16cv00767 3.0Voluntary Dismissal
Alcon Research Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:16cv00906 1.8Voluntary Dismissal
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Cipla Limited et al
1:16cv01005 2.9Voluntary Dismissal
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Par Sterile Products, LLC et al
1:16cv01066 0.4Voluntary Dismissal
116
Want of Prosecution
There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
9 27 33 46
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Want of Prosecution
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
1:08cv00166 8.8Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al
1:11cv00165 45.7Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC
1:12cv00471 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. V. Sierra Wireless Inc. et al
1:12cv00473 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Pantech Corp et al
1:12cv00476 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Dell Inc.
1:12cv00475 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al
1:12cv00477 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al
1:12cv00478 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al
1:12cv00479 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
1:12cv00480 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al.
1:12cv00481 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al.
1:12cv00482 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
1:12cv00483 32.1Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Barnes & Noble Inc. et al
1:12cv01157 26.9Want of Prosecution117
Want of Prosecution
There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
9 27 33 46
Month of Litigation
Nu
mb
er
of
Ca
se
s
Distribution of Closed Cases by MonthFor Want of Prosecution
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al
1:12cv01158 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC
1:12cv01159 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Pantech Corp., et al.
1:12cv01160 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sierra Wireless Inc., et al.
1:12cv01161 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc., et al.
1:12cv01162 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Dell Inc.
1:12cv01163 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al
1:12cv01164 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al
1:12cv01165 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al
1:12cv01166 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
1:12cv01167 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al
1:12cv01168 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v Amazon.Com Inc.
1:12cv01169 26.9Want of Prosecution
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al.
1:12cv01170 26.9Want of Prosecution
118
Awards and Settlement Amounts:The awards or settlement amounts found in these cases (if any) are shown below.
Date of Decision AmountCase OutcomeCase NumberCase Name
Bayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al
1:01cv00148 Bench Trial $1,874,57112/8/2003
Kao Corporation, et al v. Unilever U S Inc., et al
1:01cv00680 Bench Trial $6,30610/4/2004
Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment $5,0007/26/2007
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:08cv00779 Consent Judgment $1,725,000,0002/2/2010
Symbol Technologies v. Proxim Inc.
1:01cv00801 Jury Verdict $25,917,6698/4/2004
IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et al
1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict $8,691,6001/10/2007
TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation
1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict $45,300,0009/18/2007
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.
1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict $50,469,70310/2/2008
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation
1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict $41,500,0003/13/2012
Elster Electricity v. SchlumbergerSema Inc
1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict $22,300,0286/20/2003
SRI International Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
1:13cv01534 Jury Verdict $56,954,8305/25/2017
Intuitive Surgical, et al v. Computer Motion Inc.
1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict $4,442,60512/11/2002
119
Appeal Outcomes:There have been 130 appealed cases. The results of those appeals (if any) are shown below. Note that the appeal may be an interlocutory appeal or an appeal of a final judgment. The complete affirmance rate (affirmance with no other action), affirmed at least in part rate, and the reversed at least in part rate are shown below.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Complete Affirmance Affirmed at Least in Part Reversed at Least in Part
58.1
80.2
22.1
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Win Rates on Appeal
Appeal OutcomeCase OutcomeCase NumberCase Name
Cephalon Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:09cv00724 Bench Trial Affirmed
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:06cv00033 Bench Trial Affirmed
Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc.
1:14cv01422 Bench Trial Pending
Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI Inc., et al
1:03cv01158 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al
1:13cv01602 Bench Trial Pending
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:07cv00779 Bench Trial Affirmed
Cancer Research Technology Limited v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al
1:07cv00457 Bench Trial Reversed
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:11cv00164 Bench Trial Dismissed
Kao Corporation, et al v. Unilever U S Inc., et al
1:01cv00680 Bench Trial Affirmed
Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.
1:09cv00286 Bench Trial Reversed,Remanded
Intendis GmbH et al v. Glenmark Generics Limited et al
1:13cv00421 Bench Trial Affirmed
Vanderbilt University v. ICOS Corporation
1:05cv00506 Bench Trial Affirmed
120
Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:14cv01038 Bench Trial Pending
Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:07cv00823 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded
Bayer AG, et al v. Housey Pharmaceutica, et al
1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al
1:07cv00331 Bench Trial Affirmed
Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical
1:02cv01250 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
1:15cv00250 Bench Trial Pending
In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation
1:09md02118 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Dismissed
OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1:09cv00185 Bench Trial Dismissed
In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation
1:05cv00356 Bench Trial Affirmed
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:14cv00874 Bench Trial Pending
Genetics Institute LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc.
1:08cv00290 Bench Trial Affirmed
Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corporation, et al
1:03cv00848 Bench Trial Affirmed
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al
1:11cv00271 Bench Trial Affirmed
Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
1:06cv00234 Bench Trial Dismissed
Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.
1:09cv00333 Bench Trial Affirmed
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
1:08cv00330 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed
Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al
1:02cv00332 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al
1:13cv00430 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
Poly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.
1:14cv00599 Consent Judgment Pending
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Vevo LLC
1:13cv00436 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
1:11cv01152 Consent Judgment Affirmed
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
1:13cv00429 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc.
1:13cv00962 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Disney Online et al.
1:13cv00433 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Viacom International Inc.
1:13cv00437 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
121
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc.
1:13cv00428 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Dismissed
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company
1:13cv00539 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc.
1:13cv00712 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc.
1:13cv00541 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC Bank N.A.
1:14cv01428 Involuntary Dismissal Pending
Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al
1:03cv00990 Involuntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded,Dismissed
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC
1:13cv00538 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC
1:13cv00540 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank et al
1:14cv01427 Involuntary Dismissal Pending
Drager Medical GmbH et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc.
1:13cv01656 Involuntary Dismissal Pending
Goodman Manufacturing Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation
1:13cv02014 Involuntary Dismissal Pending
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc.
1:13cv00542 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed
Parus Holdings Inc. v. SunTrust Bank et al
1:14cv01429 Involuntary Dismissal Pending
Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
1:11cv01171 Involuntary Dismissal Affirmed
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation
1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC
1:11cv00908 Jury Verdict Pending
Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al
1:02cv01331 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Stambler v. RSA Security Inc., et al
1:01cv00065 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company
1:06cv00091 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
SOITEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc.
1:08cv00292 Jury Verdict Dismissed
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc.
1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded
Ironworks Patents LLC v. Apple Inc.
1:10cv00258 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded
Asahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. Guardian Industries Corp.
1:09cv00515 Jury Verdict Dismissed
122
McKesson Automation Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG et al
1:06cv00028 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et al
1:14cv01317 Jury Verdict Pending
Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp
1:08cv00542 Jury Verdict Reversed,Remanded
Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al
1:08cv00063 Jury Verdict Dismissed
IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et al
1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict Dismissed
ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., et al
1:01cv00504 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded,Dismissed
Intel Corporation v. Broadcom Corporation
1:00cv00796 Jury Verdict Dismissed
INVISTA North America S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al
1:11cv01007 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
ArcelorMittal France et al v. AK Steel Corporation et al
1:10cv00050 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated,Remanded
Elster Electricity v. SchlumbergerSema Inc
1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict Affirmed
TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation
1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict Affirmed
Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.
1:10cv00999 Jury Verdict Dismissed
Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:12cv00140 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
Abbott Laboratories et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al
1:06cv00613 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNA et al
1:15cv00661 Lack of Jurisdiction Pending
Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc.
1:12cv00142 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
Innovative Therapies Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al
1:07cv00589 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
Walker Digital LLC v. Expedia Inc. et al
1:11cv00313 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc.
1:12cv00141 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al
1:07cv00780 Lack of Jurisdiction Dismissed
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron LLC
1:07cv00650 Lack of Jurisdiction Reversed,Remanded,Dismissed
Housey v. Abbott Pharm Corp., et al
1:01cv00401 Other Termination Affirmed
Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al
1:03cv00283 Other Termination Reversed
Medtronic Vascular v. Boston Scientific, et al
1:04cv00034 Other Termination Affirmed
Bio-Technology Gen. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al
1:02cv00235 Remand to State Court Dismissed
Oracle Corporation et al v. Parallel Networks LLC
1:06cv00414 Summary Judgment Vacated,Remanded
Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Cokebusters USA Inc.
1:14cv01483 Summary Judgment Pending
Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
1:08cv00568 Summary Judgment Affirmed
123
Joao Bock Transaction Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc.
1:12cv01138 Summary Judgment Pending
Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al
1:05cv00141 Summary Judgment Dismissed
Helicos Biosciences Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc
1:10cv00735 Summary Judgment Dismissed
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
1:10cv00039 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated
Monsanto Company, et al v. Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al
1:04cv00305 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
1:14cv00194 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
1:13cv00941 Summary Judgment Affirmed
ArcelorMittal et al v. AK Steel Corporation
1:13cv00685 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
IGT v. Bally Gaming International Inc. et al
1:06cv00282 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Quest Integrity USA LLC v. Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc.
1:14cv01482 Summary Judgment Pending
Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun Products Corporation
1:12cv00651 Summary Judgment Affirmed
LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & Body Works, et al
1:04cv01507 Summary Judgment Dismissed
Cradle IP LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.
1:11cv01254 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
1:07cv00765 Summary Judgment Affirmed
CyberFone Systems LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
1:11cv00831 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc.
1:11cv00054 Summary Judgment Reversed,Vacated,Remanded
Poly-America L P v. API Industries Inc.
1:13cv00693 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.
1:06cv00557 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
Golden Bridge Technology Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
1:10cv00428 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Automated Transactions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al
1:06cv00043 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc.
1:13cv00148 Summary Judgment Dismissed
Wellman Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Company
1:07cv00585 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remanded
Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm Foods Inc.
1:10cv00841 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Izumi Products Co v. Koninklijke Philips, et al
1:02cv00156 Summary Judgment Affirmed
BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.
1:14cv01204 Summary Judgment Pending
SRI International v. Internet Security, et al
1:04cv01199 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded
Accenture Global Services GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc.
1:07cv00826 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Toshiba Corporation v. Juniper Networks, et al
1:03cv01035 Summary Judgment Affirmed 124
Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes Noble Inc.
1:13cv00942 Summary Judgment Affirmed
CyberFone Systems LLC v. CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al
1:11cv00829 Summary Judgment Affirmed
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.
1:07cv00272 Summary Judgment Affirmed
ArcelorMittal France et al v. Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al
1:13cv00686 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Remanded
Braintree Lab v. Schwarz Pharma Inc.
1:03cv00477 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed
Marvell International Ltd. v. Link A Media Devices Corp
1:10cv00869 Voluntary Dismissal Reversed
CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed
Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis Corporation
1:03cv00402 Voluntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded
Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX International Inc.
1:07cv00137 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed
Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. et al
1:14cv00270 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed
Lab Corp of America, et al v. Chiron Corporation
1:03cv00364 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
1:08cv00166 Want of Prosecution Dismissed
125
Motion Outcomes:The number of contested motion decisions, win rate, and time in months from motion filing to decision by Judge Robinson in these cases are shown below, broken out by motion type and movant. The movant for Markman decisions is listed as "Unknown" in LegalMetric's system because there is not requirement for an actual motion to initiate the claim construction process, and the win rate is arbitrarily set to "0". The stay motions listed below include all stay motions, not just stay pending IPR or stay pending reexamination motions. See following sections for details. For all motion types, the average win rate on plaintiff's motions was 44.7%, the average win rate on defendant's motions was 37.4% and the difference was 7.2%. The nationwide difference on plaintiff v. defendant motion win rates in patent cases is 6%.
Number Win Rate Pendency
Bifurcation Total 14 64.3 2.6
Defendant 7 71.4 2.7
Plaintiff 7 57.1 2.5
Consolidate Total 29 27.6 2.8
Defendant 9 0.0 3.3
Plaintiff 20 40.0 2.5
Contempt Total 2 50.0 7.4
Plaintiff 2 50.0 7.4
Default Motion Total 9 77.8 1.0
Plaintiff 9 77.8 1.0
Discovery Total 166 61.7 1.9
Defendant 67 61.2 2.3
Plaintiff 91 61.0 1.5
Third Party 7 71.4 2.6
Unknown 1 100.0 0.0
Dismissal Total 270 43.3 6.0
Defendant 217 43.1 6.3
Plaintiff 52 43.3 4.8
Third Party 1 100.0 2.6
Exceptional Case Total 13 15.4 8.2
Defendant 10 20.0 8.2
Plaintiff 3 0.0 8.3
Expert/Daubert Total 172 43.0 2.2
Defendant 86 40.1 2.3
Plaintiff 85 45.3 2.1
Third Party 1 100.0 1.7126
Number Win Rate Pendency
Increased Damages Total 1 100.0 9.1
Plaintiff 1 100.0 9.1
Intervention Total 7 78.6 1.6
Plaintiff 1 100.0 0.2
Third Party 6 75.0 1.9
Judgment on the Pleadings
Total 13 50.0 4.8
Defendant 11 59.1 5.0
Plaintiff 2 0.0 3.4
Markman Decision Total 112 0.9 25.7
Unknown 112 0.9 25.7
Permanent Injunction Total 19 47.4 7.7
Defendant 1 0.0 8.8
Plaintiff 18 50.0 7.6
Post-trial Total 118 14.4 8.2
Defendant 81 11.1 8.7
Plaintiff 37 21.6 7.1
Preliminary Injunction Total 34 35.3 5.7
Defendant 2 50.0 4.2
Plaintiff 32 34.4 5.8
Remand Motion Total 1 100.0 7.6
Plaintiff 1 100.0 7.6
Sanctions/Attorneys Fees Total 42 33.3 6.6
Defendant 27 14.8 6.3
Plaintiff 14 64.3 7.2
Third Party 1 100.0 7.6
Sever Total 29 34.5 4.4
Defendant 23 21.7 4.6
Plaintiff 6 83.3 3.6
Stay Total 133 49.2 3.5
Defendant 106 48.1 3.7
Plaintiff 26 51.9 2.4
Third Party 1 100.0 8.3
Summary Judgment Total 443 36.6 4.4
Defendant 266 36.5 4.3
Plaintiff 177 36.7 4.5 127
Number Win Rate Pendency
Temporary Restraining Order Motion
Total 6 50.0 2.9
Plaintiff 6 50.0 2.9
Transfer Motion Total 81 29.0 5.3
Defendant 79 27.8 5.3
Plaintiff 2 75.0 5.4
128
Bifurcation
There were 14 Bifurcation contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 64.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 7 8
2
5
3
1 1 1 1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Bifurcation
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:09cv00264 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 7.4 1/20/11
1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03
1:08cv00542 Granted Defendant 1.9 8/26/09
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 12/21/09
1:08cv00292 Granted Defendant 2.0 12/21/09
1:06cv00028 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 9/16/08
1:05cv00768 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/29/06
1:03cv01035 Granted Defendant 1.1 6/28/06
1:03cv00983 Granted Defendant 0.9 2/22/06
1:02cv00332 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.0 11/21/02
1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 6.2 12/15/03
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 8/27/02
1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02
1:01cv00203 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/02
129
Consolidate
There were 29 Consolidate contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 27.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 7 13
12
54
1
3 3
1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Consolidate
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 4.4 8/27/04
1:03cv00237 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 6/15/04
1:03cv00526 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 1/29/04
1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 4.8 1/26/05
1:04cv00118 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 6/15/04
1:05cv00147 Granted Plaintiff 1.0 9/14/05
1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07
1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07
1:97cv00712 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/13/01
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.9 5/5/04
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04
1:99cv00570 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/13/01
1:99cv00846 Granted Plaintiff 20.0 9/28/01
1:06cv00197 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 5/13/09
1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 5/13/09
1:09cv00185 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 5/8/09
1:09cv00917 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/29/10
1:09cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/29/10
1:10cv00691 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 12/21/10
1:09cv00695 Denied Plaintiff 2.8 6/9/11
1:10cv00428 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 2.9 8/16/11
1:11cv00165 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 2.8 8/16/11130
1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 3/12/12
1:11cv00843 Denied Defendant 1.1 3/12/12
1:11cv00165 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 2.8 8/16/11
1:15cv00026 Denied Defendant 4.3 8/9/16
1:16cv00025 Denied Defendant 1.1 5/31/16
1:15cv00902 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/24/16
1:16cv00628 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/24/16
131
Contempt
There were 2 Contempt contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
8
2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Contempt
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:95cv00545 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/28/02
1:95cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 7.2 7/31/03
132
Default Motion
There were 9 Default Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 77.8%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 7
7
1 1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Default Motion
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 12/12/02
1:07cv00787 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 4/21/08
1:07cv00787 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 8/4/10
1:11cv00830 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/11/12
1:11cv00830 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/11/12
1:12cv01765 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 4/5/13
1:12cv01008 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 8/19/13
1:13cv00246 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 8/5/13
1:13cv00902 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 7/15/13
133
Discovery
There were 166 Discovery contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 61.7%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13
94
24 23
5 3 3 6 4 1 3
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Discovery
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:00cv01002 Denied Defendant 2.6 6/22/01
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 0.5 7/30/02
1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02
1:02cv00162 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/30/02
1:02cv00164 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/30/02
1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 2/16/00
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.7 10/21/05
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.7 10/21/05
1:04cv01258 Granted Plaintiff 0.6 10/21/05
1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 10/21/05
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.5 10/21/05
1:09cv00167 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 5/14/09
1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 5.4 10/19/10
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 7/13/11
1:10cv00128 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 12/16/10
1:11cv00322 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 7/3/12
1:15cv00157 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 10/6/15
1:15cv00525 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 3/14/16
1:15cv00262 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/5/16
1:15cv00543 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 6/22/16
1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/11/16
1:15cv00760 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/26/16
1:15cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 1.3 9/27/16
1:15cv00543 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16134
1:15cv00544 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16
1:15cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16
1:15cv00546 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16
1:15cv00547 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16
1:15cv00525 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 10/7/16
1:15cv00760 Granted Plaintiff 0.6 11/29/16
1:15cv00546 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/30/17
1:15cv00634 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/2/17
1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 3/2/17
1:15cv01031 Granted Defendant 0.0 2/16/17
1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 2/8/17
1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 1/5/17
1:15cv01033 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 2/6/17
1:16cv00666 Granted Defendant 0.3 2/1/17
1:14cv01268 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/2/17
1:15cv00288 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/23/17
1:15cv00427 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/24/17
1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 5/30/17
1:16cv00666 Granted Defendant 1.1 5/9/17
1:15cv00218 Granted Defendant 0.7 5/25/17
1:15cv00288 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 3/30/17
1:15cv00542 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17
1:15cv00543 Granted Third Party 0.0 5/30/17
1:15cv00544 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17
1:15cv00545 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17
1:15cv00546 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17
1:15cv00547 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17
1:16cv00275 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/24/17
1:16cv00650 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/20/17
1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 1.7 6/28/01
1:99cv00781 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 5/24/01
1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 6/20/02
1:01cv00141 Granted Defendant 2.3 5/17/02
1:01cv00148 Granted Third Party 0.2 1/30/02
1:01cv00193 Granted Defendant 1.2 1/4/02
1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.0 2/7/02
1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.5 4/8/02
1:01cv00401 Granted Defendant 3.0 6/20/02
1:01cv00493 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 12/17/01
1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 1.0 12/12/02
1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 1.7 8/1/03
1:02cv00156 Granted Third Party 6.3 2/9/04
1:02cv00471 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 0.6 1/22/03
1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 0.0 12/18/03
1:03cv00402 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04
1:03cv00477 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/12/04
1:03cv00526 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04
135
1:03cv00527 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04
1:03cv00528 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04
1:03cv00530 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04
1:03cv00530 Denied Defendant 0.7 7/27/04
1:03cv00848 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.5 7/8/04
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 1.2 5/20/05
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.5 5/20/05
1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 5/26/04
1:03cv01030 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 1.2 3/11/05
1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04
1:04cv00305 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 6/29/05
1:04cv01258 Granted Third Party 1.3 7/6/05
1:05cv00528 Denied Defendant 1.8 9/14/05
1:96cv00101 Granted Defendant 7.6 1/8/02
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 40.1 1/13/04
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.8 8/26/04
1:05cv00645 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 9/13/06
1:05cv00595 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/22/06
1:03cv00983 Granted Defendant 0.3 3/13/06
1:06cv00358 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 3/9/07
1:06cv00105 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/23/07
1:06cv00239 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.7 7/19/07
1:06cv00239 Granted Unknown 0.0 8/23/07
1:07cv00787 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/21/08
1:06cv00414 Granted Plaintiff 1.4 11/17/08
1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.5 12/15/10
1:08cv00568 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/20/12
1:10cv00658 Denied Defendant 2.1 1/8/13
1:11cv00843 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/8/13
1:12cv00703 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 12/13/12
1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/12
1:13cv00474 Granted Plaintiff 3.8 5/23/16
1:08cv00568 Granted Third Party 0.9 6/8/16
1:15cv00218 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/14/16
1:15cv01077 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 6/24/16
1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 5.5 3/28/17
1:15cv00262 Granted Defendant 0.1 9/13/16136
1:15cv00654 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 11/16/16
1:16cv00275 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/10/17
1:16cv00666 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/7/17
1:00cv00796 Denied Third Party 7.9 3/25/02
1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 6.0 5/2/03
1:03cv00477 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 9/14/04
1:04cv01264 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.6 1/10/06
1:11cv01254 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 4/29/13
1:13cv00473 Denied Third Party 1.7 9/9/14
1:00cv00143 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.0 5/23/01
1:00cv00143 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/27/01
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 1/29/03
1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 12.3 3/25/02
1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 12.3 3/25/02
1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 11.9 3/25/02
1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 3/25/02
1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 7.6 6/20/02
1:01cv00077 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.6 2/13/03
1:01cv00141 Granted Defendant 2.2 5/17/02
1:01cv00141 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 5/17/02
1:01cv00148 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.0 6/20/02
1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 6/20/02
1:01cv00148 Granted Defendant 1.4 6/20/02
1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 3.2 8/13/02
1:01cv00168 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.6 8/16/02
1:01cv00203 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 11/9/01
1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.4 11/9/01
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 4.7 4/14/03
1:01cv00801 Denied Defendant 6.5 5/2/03
1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 5.9 2/9/04
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.0 4/21/04
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 4/21/04
1:03cv00115 Granted Defendant 1.8 2/3/04
1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 2.1 3/11/05
1:03cv00848 Denied Plaintiff 2.8 4/21/04137
1:03cv01138 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.2 8/4/04
1:05cv00355 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/05
1:05cv00355 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/05
1:05cv00528 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 8/31/05
1:99cv00904 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.9 6/8/01
1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 0.7 8/6/01
1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 0.3 10/21/05
1:03cv01158 Granted Defendant 7.1 8/17/06
1:04cv01414 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 1.8 3/16/06
1:01cv00065 Denied Defendant 2.5 6/20/02
1:99cv00904 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.9 6/8/01
1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 0.7 8/6/01
1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 2.1 1/7/11
1:10cv00128 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 12/16/10
1:11cv00313 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 12/14/12
1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 12/14/12
1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 1.7 12/14/12
1:11cv01254 Granted Plaintiff 2.4 4/29/13
1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.8 11/23/15
1:15cv00634 Granted Defendant 1.6 11/30/16
1:12cv00487 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 7/26/17
1:12cv00487 Granted Defendant 3.4 8/9/17
138
Dismissal
There were 270 Dismissal contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 6.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1215
2325
3431
28
39
26
12
75
13
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Dismissal
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:00cv00457 Denied Defendant 5.0 2/28/01
1:00cv00629 Granted Defendant 7.9 9/27/01
1:00cv00886 Denied Plaintiff 8.2 9/25/01
1:00cv01002 Granted Defendant 4.1 6/22/01
1:00cv01013 Denied Defendant 3.6 5/16/01
1:00cv01013 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 9.7 9/30/02
1:00cv01013 Granted Defendant 9.4 9/30/02
1:00cv01069 Denied Defendant 3.4 5/23/01
1:01cv00070 Granted Defendant 1.3 5/29/01
1:01cv00070 Denied Defendant 1.1 5/29/01
1:01cv00077 Granted Plaintiff 8.0 6/11/02
1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 6.7 10/17/01
1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 6.0 10/17/01
1:01cv00266 Granted Defendant 6.3 11/28/01
1:01cv00387 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 7/31/02
1:01cv00401 Granted Defendant 2.4 2/15/02
1:01cv00401 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.1 6/20/02
1:01cv00416 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/8/02
1:01cv00537 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 6/10/02
1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 12/12/02 139
1:01cv00801 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 6/25/02
1:01cv00801 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 1/29/03
1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/29/03
1:02cv00467 Denied Plaintiff 5.2 1/27/03
1:02cv00471 Denied Plaintiff 5.1 1/22/03
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 11/22/04
1:02cv01427 Denied Defendant 3.5 3/4/04
1:02cv01427 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.5 3/4/04
1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03
1:03cv00477 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.6 9/14/04
1:03cv00526 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/04
1:03cv00527 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/04
1:03cv00530 Granted Defendant 1.7 5/5/04
1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 5.2 5/24/04
1:03cv00990 Granted Defendant 5.7 6/28/04
1:03cv00990 Granted Defendant 2.9 6/28/04
1:03cv01067 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/24/04
1:04cv00067 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 5.1 10/26/04
1:04cv00269 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 10.0 3/18/05
1:04cv00305 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 10.7 8/7/06
1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 8.5 8/7/06
1:04cv00818 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.3 2/15/05
1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05
1:04cv01199 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 5.9 4/13/05
1:04cv01231 Denied Plaintiff 5.1 4/13/05
1:04cv01258 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 4.9 4/20/05
1:04cv01293 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.1 2/15/05
1:04cv01343 Granted Defendant 7.5 8/3/05
1:04cv01414 Denied Defendant 1.8 1/14/05
1:04cv01451 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.7 2/18/05
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 12.6 10/19/06140
1:05cv00239 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 9.1 3/27/06
1:05cv00336 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.7 3/31/06
1:05cv00337 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.7 3/31/06
1:95cv00709 Granted Defendant 1.0 1/15/03
1:97cv00550 Granted Plaintiff 7.7 3/22/00
1:98cv00424 Denied Defendant 4.4 2/24/00
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 7.1 3/30/01
1:98cv00478 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.8 4/5/04
1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 8.0 9/29/00
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 4.7 7/8/03
1:99cv00301 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.6 12/13/00
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 10.4 10/19/06
1:06cv00383 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.7 3/7/07
1:04cv00884 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 1/19/07
1:05cv00725 Denied Defendant 22.3 9/30/08
1:07cv00137 Denied Defendant 3.9 8/2/07
1:05cv00645 Granted Defendant 2.2 9/10/07
1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 6.3 1/25/08
1:06cv00613 Granted Defendant 2.9 11/28/07
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 13.1 11/5/08
1:07cv00190 Granted Defendant 3.0 3/7/08
1:07cv00552 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 3.1 3/7/08
1:07cv00650 Granted Defendant 14.7 3/11/09
1:07cv00779 Granted Defendant 1.2 2/27/08
1:07cv00780 Granted Defendant 3.8 5/12/08
1:07cv00826 Granted Defendant 8.0 10/8/08
1:08cv00016 Denied Defendant 0.4 2/27/08
1:07cv00589 Granted Defendant 7.8 11/5/08
1:07cv00826 Granted Plaintiff 6.5 10/8/08
1:08cv00330 Denied Defendant 8.6 4/3/09
1:08cv00330 Denied Defendant 8.6 4/3/09
1:06cv00091 Granted Defendant 3.0 11/10/08
1:07cv00823 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 11/21/08
1:07cv00840 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 6/3/08
1:08cv00166 Granted Defendant 6.7 12/17/08
1:08cv00290 Denied Defendant 6.2 2/18/09141
1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 7.4 2/20/09
1:08cv00334 Denied Defendant 1.9 9/26/08
1:08cv00542 Granted Defendant 3.1 7/10/09
1:08cv00489 Granted Defendant 5.8 8/24/09
1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.3 5/29/09
1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 4.1 5/29/09
1:08cv00635 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.7 5/19/09
1:08cv00823 Denied Defendant 4.6 6/17/09
1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/18/10
1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 4.1 11/3/09
1:08cv00290 Granted Defendant 5.2 2/24/10
1:09cv00022 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 10.6 3/31/10
1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 1.8 10/16/09
1:09cv00234 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/10
1:01cv00155 Granted Defendant 0.0 6/18/01
1:08cv00823 Granted Defendant 9.5 9/30/10
1:09cv00628 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.9 8/12/10
1:09cv00628 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.8 8/12/10
1:09cv00628 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.8 8/12/10
1:09cv00694 Denied Plaintiff 5.7 9/30/10
1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 5.9 11/22/10
1:10cv00001 Granted Defendant 5.1 8/25/10
1:10cv00001 Granted Defendant 6.0 8/25/10
1:09cv00234 Denied Defendant 7.5 11/9/10
1:09cv00860 Granted Defendant 6.8 8/25/10
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.7 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.1 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.1 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.8 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.5 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.2 3/16/11
1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.0 3/16/11
1:10cv00690 Denied Defendant 6.7 6/28/11
1:10cv00812 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.7 7/12/11
142
1:10cv00812 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.1 7/12/11
1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.1 3/10/11
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 8.4 9/30/11
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 6.1 9/30/11
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11
1:11cv00107 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 7/28/11
1:11cv00165 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 2.2 8/16/11
1:10cv00690 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 10.3 9/6/12
1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/29/12
1:11cv00084 Denied Defendant 12.9 8/2/12
1:11cv00313 Denied Defendant 7.7 4/4/12
1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 8.2 4/4/12
1:11cv00615 Denied Defendant 8.5 5/17/12
1:11cv00623 Granted Defendant 11.9 8/28/12
1:11cv00690 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.8 4/25/12
1:11cv00821 Denied Defendant 4.2 3/1/12
1:11cv00773 Granted Defendant 12.0 10/23/12
1:11cv00773 Granted Defendant 9.4 10/23/12
1:11cv00827 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00828 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00829 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00831 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00833 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00835 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv01152 Granted Defendant 8.8 9/6/12
1:11cv01171 Granted Defendant 8.3 9/17/12
1:11cv00830 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
143
1:11cv00834 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.1 4/30/12
1:11cv00967 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 8.3 9/28/12
1:10cv00999 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 9.4 3/14/13
1:12cv00614 Granted Defendant 9.5 3/27/13
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/16/12
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 6/21/12
1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:12cv00159 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 9.0 2/6/13
1:10cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 9/13/12
1:11cv01025 Granted Defendant 12.9 4/1/13
1:11cv01025 Granted Defendant 12.9 4/1/13
1:12cv00613 Denied Defendant 9.6 3/27/13
1:11cv00313 Granted Defendant 6.6 6/19/13
1:12cv00931 Denied Defendant 7.7 5/16/13
1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 5.5 6/13/13
1:12cv01281 Denied Defendant 3.7 4/29/13
1:12cv01302 Granted Defendant 7.1 6/5/13
1:12cv01302 Granted Defendant 5.8 6/5/13
1:11cv00690 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 8/15/13
1:12cv00140 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13
1:12cv00142 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13
1:12cv00660 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.3 6/26/13
1:12cv01277 Denied Defendant 5.2 8/6/13
1:12cv01491 Denied Defendant 6.2 8/6/13
1:12cv01491 Denied Defendant 5.9 8/6/13
1:12cv01724 Granted Defendant 4.6 7/8/13
1:12cv00141 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13
1:10cv00658 Granted Defendant 2.3 7/22/13
1:11cv00313 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/25/13
1:11cv00843 Granted Plaintiff 2.3 7/22/13
1:12cv00140 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.2 10/16/13
1:12cv01141 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.4 1/17/14
1:12cv01265 Granted Third Party 2.6 5/9/13
1:12cv01301 Granted Defendant 7.4 1/28/14
144
1:13cv00453 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 14.8 9/3/14
1:13cv00474 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 14.9 9/12/14
1:13cv00597 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 8/8/13
1:13cv00616 Denied Defendant 10.1 4/8/14
1:13cv00624 Denied Defendant 10.1 4/8/14
1:13cv01052 Denied Defendant 8.1 4/8/14
1:13cv01452 Denied Defendant 5.2 4/8/14
1:12cv01301 Denied Defendant 5.8 5/2/13
1:12cv00142 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/25/13
1:12cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 12/16/13
1:12cv00448 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 12/16/13
1:13cv01274 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 12.5 12/18/14
1:13cv01450 Denied Defendant 5.0 4/8/14
1:13cv02014 Granted Defendant 7.6 9/23/14
1:14cv00033 Denied Defendant 2.2 4/8/14
1:13cv00625 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/8/14
1:13cv02012 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 8.0 11/5/14
1:14cv00036 Denied Defendant 1.1 4/8/14
1:14cv00034 Denied Defendant 0.5 4/8/14
1:13cv02020 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 2.9 10/10/14
1:14cv00393 Granted Defendant 7.8 3/31/15
1:14cv00559 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.9 3/10/15
1:14cv00578 Granted Defendant 7.7 3/31/15
1:14cv00579 Granted Defendant 7.8 3/30/15
1:14cv00617 Granted Defendant 7.5 3/30/15
1:14cv00779 Granted Defendant 7.6 3/30/15
1:14cv00874 Granted Defendant 11.7 7/22/15
1:14cv00894 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00895 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00896 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00897 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
145
1:14cv00899 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00901 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00902 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv00903 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 8.5 6/5/15
1:14cv01081 Denied Defendant 7.1 4/16/15
1:13cv02049 Denied Plaintiff 7.5 3/12/15
1:14cv01081 Denied Defendant 4.9 4/16/15
1:14cv01189 Granted Defendant 4.7 3/30/15
1:13cv00619 Denied Defendant 0.7 10/28/14
1:13cv02012 Denied Defendant 12.7 1/28/16
1:13cv02012 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 11.0 1/28/16
1:14cv01427 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15
1:14cv01428 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15
1:14cv01429 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15
1:13cv01893 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 4/16/15
1:14cv01482 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 7/22/15
1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 7/22/15
1:15cv00026 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 14.6 6/15/16
1:15cv00260 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/6/15
1:14cv00903 Denied Defendant 7.7 3/22/16
1:14cv00904 Denied Defendant 7.7 3/22/16
1:14cv01295 Denied Defendant 0.7 5/27/15
1:15cv00218 Denied Defendant 7.4 1/12/16
1:15cv00248 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/3/16
1:15cv00262 Denied Defendant 9.2 3/22/16
1:15cv00288 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 10.1 3/28/16
1:15cv00431 Granted Defendant 7.1 2/19/16
1:15cv00432 Granted Defendant 7.1 2/19/16
1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15
1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 12/4/15
1:13cv00453 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 4/7/16
1:14cv01268 Granted Defendant 7.6 5/18/16
1:15cv00427 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/22/16
1:15cv00545 Granted Defendant 6.5 4/6/16
1:15cv00647 Granted Plaintiff 8.3 7/25/16
1:15cv00654 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 9.6 8/11/16
146
1:15cv00661 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 5.0 2/4/16
1:15cv00762 Granted Defendant 6.6 5/17/16
1:15cv00808 Denied Defendant 4.7 4/25/16
1:13cv00685 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/19/16
1:15cv00634 Denied Defendant 9.6 9/29/16
1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 7.6 9/29/16
1:15cv00960 Denied Defendant 6.1 8/12/16
1:15cv00355 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.1 3/22/16
1:15cv00661 Granted Defendant 6.4 12/14/16
1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/29/16
1:15cv01034 Granted Defendant 6.8 10/31/16
1:16cv00208 Denied Defendant 13.1 7/11/17
1:15cv00288 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/1/17
1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 6.9 3/20/17
1:16cv00197 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.9 2/14/17
1:16cv01240 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/15/17
147
Exceptional Case
There were 13 Exceptional Case contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 15.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
3 5 6 8 10 12 13
2
1 1
5
1 1
2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Exceptional Case
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 16.2 8/11/06
1:08cv00568 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.0 5/3/12
1:08cv00568 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.0 5/3/12
1:09md02118 Granted Defendant 7.6 1/12/12
1:10cv00315 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 3/13/12
1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 11.5 3/31/16
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 7.6 3/31/14
1:12cv00451 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/31/15
1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 14.8 3/31/16
1:12cv00282 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.9 10/30/14
1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 5.7 7/11/17
148
Expert/Daubert
There were 172 Expert/Daubert contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 2.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13
64
32
22 22 20
72 1 2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
sDistribution of Decisions by Month
For Expert/Daubert
The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why
1:99cv00274 Granted Defendant 1.6 9/26/03
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/24/03
1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 0.7 11/9/01
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/24/03
1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 0.6 1/24/03
1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 0.5 2/5/03
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 0.5 7/30/02
1:01cv00203 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/02
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 0.9 4/14/03
1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 4/14/03
1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 0.4 4/14/03
1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 0.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 0.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03
1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/03
1:01cv00801 Granted Defendant 0.5 7/30/03
1:02cv00235 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/03
1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/03
1:02cv00366 Granted Defendant 4.6 2/12/03149
1:02cv01250 Granted Defendant 2.0 12/18/03
1:02cv01250 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 12/18/03
1:02cv01250 Granted Defendant 0.5 12/18/03
1:02cv01250 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.2 1/12/04
1:02cv01331 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 9/8/04
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.6 9/27/04
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 11/19/04
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 11/19/04
1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 4.9 10/7/04
1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 9/29/05
1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 12.4 9/27/06
1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 12.4 9/27/06
1:03cv00848 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 10/6/04
1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.9 10/19/06
1:04cv01507 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06
1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06
1:03cv01158 Granted Plaintiff 5.4 11/8/05
1:03cv01158 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 11/8/05
1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04
1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05
1:04cv00858 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 3/28/06
1:04cv00858 Granted Plaintiff 5.7 3/28/06
1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06
1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06
1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06
1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.9 10/19/06
1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 5.8 10/12/00
1:97cv00700 Denied Plaintiff 4.2 10/12/00
1:98cv00080 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 8/26/04
1:98cv00080 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00424 Granted Defendant 0.5 2/24/00
1:98cv00424 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.5 2/24/00
1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04
1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/7/00
1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/7/00
1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.9 9/12/02
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 7/8/03
150
1:99cv00301 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.8 12/22/00
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 0.6 8/6/01
1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 3.5 4/5/06
1:04cv01258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 4/5/06
1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 4/5/06
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.0 4/13/06
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.1 4/13/06
1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06
1:04cv00305 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 0.9 11/8/06
1:04cv00305 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 0.9 11/8/06
1:04cv00305 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 0.9 11/8/06
1:05cv00552 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 1/10/07
1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 1.1 8/29/01
1:05cv00747 Granted Defendant 3.2 8/23/07
1:06cv00091 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.3 11/20/07
1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 2.3 11/20/07
1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08
1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08
1:07cv00457 Granted Defendant 0.6 3/4/09
1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 0.5 1/21/03
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 0.6 4/16/03
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 0.6 4/16/03
1:01cv00148 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.5 11/20/02
1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 0.4 12/18/03
1:03cv00848 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 0.4 10/6/04
1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:96cv00589 Granted Defendant 0.6 8/14/01
1:97cv00550 Granted Defendant 1.0 2/23/05
1:97cv00712 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.7 3/8/01
1:98cv00080 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00424 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/24/00
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05151
1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 9/26/03
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 9/26/03
1:99cv00301 Denied Defendant 0.8 12/22/00
1:99cv00781 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.7 11/9/01
1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 0.7 11/9/01
1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10
1:07cv00409 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10
1:08cv00112 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 9/23/09
1:08cv00112 Denied Defendant 1.1 1/26/10
1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 4.6 1/20/11
1:09cv00724 Denied Defendant 7.8 3/24/11
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 0.2 3/18/11
1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 2.8 4/13/11
1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/13/11
1:09cv00515 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.4 10/3/11
1:04cv01199 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.8 10/31/11
1:04cv01199 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.8 10/31/11
1:06cv00557 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.7 9/8/11
1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 11/4/11
1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 5.2 1/24/12
1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 1.4 4/20/12
1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 1.4 4/20/12
1:10cv00269 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 4/20/12
1:09cv00627 Denied Defendant 5.2 1/24/12
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 2.3 8/28/12
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 4.6 11/8/12
1:10cv00841 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.6 9/13/12
1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 1.6 9/13/12152
1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 1.6 9/13/12
1:10cv00428 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/9/13
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 0.0 10/10/12
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 3/19/13
1:10cv00428 Granted Plaintiff 2.4 4/9/13
1:10cv00428 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.4 4/9/13
1:10cv00428 Denied Plaintiff 2.4 4/9/13
1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 4/9/13
1:13cv00576 Denied Defendant 3.3 7/26/13
1:11cv01007 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.1 6/25/13
1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 2.8 6/25/13
1:11cv01007 Granted Defendant 3.6 6/25/13
1:10cv00503 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Invalidity
1:10cv00503 Denied Defendant 1.7 9/9/13
1:10cv00658 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.7 1/13/14 Infringement
1:11cv01254 Granted Defendant 1.8 11/20/13
1:11cv01254 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 11/20/13
1:11cv01254 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.9 11/20/13
1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/30/13
1:11cv00615 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 6.6 7/22/14
1:11cv00792 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/10/14
1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Obviousness
1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Testing
1:12cv00282 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 5/14/14
1:12cv00930 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 9/8/14
1:13cv00693 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 11/25/14
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 4.5 11/9/15
1:14cv00874 Granted Third Party 1.7 9/3/15 Infringement
1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 FDA Procedures
1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 Infringement; FDA Approved Label
1:14cv01317 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.5 2/18/16 Written Description; Reasonable Royalties
1:14cv01317 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.5 2/18/16
1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 2/18/16 Technical
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16
153
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16
1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 4.1 12/19/16 Infringement
1:13cv00453 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/19/16
1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 4.2 2/22/17
1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 4.2 2/22/17
1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 4.3 2/22/17 Survey
154
Increased Damages
There were 1 Increased Damages contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 9.1. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
10
1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Increased Damages
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 9.1 3/13/12
155
Intervention
There were 7 Intervention contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 78.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
2.4
2.8
3.2
1 2 3 4
2
3
1 1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Intervention
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:07cv00787 Granted Third Party 0.8 10/23/08
1:95cv00575 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Third Party 3.7 6/29/00
1:98cv00424 Granted Third Party 1.1 5/2/00
1:11cv00690 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/6/14
1:12cv00282 Denied without Prejudice
Third Party 1.8 10/30/14
1:14cv01457 Granted Third Party 2.1 5/1/15
1:14cv00874 Granted Third Party 1.7 9/3/15
156
Judgment on the Pleadings
There were 13 Judgment on the Pleadings contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
2.4
2.8
3.2
1 2 3 6 8 9 10
3
2
1 1
3
2
1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Judgment on the Pleadings
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:99cv00301 Denied Defendant 7.7 12/14/00
1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 1.8 10/16/09
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 6/21/12
1:11cv00271 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.0 12/7/12
1:13cv00693 Denied Defendant 8.9 4/10/14
1:13cv02072 Granted Defendant 7.2 3/17/15
1:14cv00787 Granted Defendant 0.4 10/17/14
1:14cv01489 Granted Defendant 8.8 10/8/15
1:13cv00957 Granted Defendant 9.6 1/12/16
1:13cv00474 Denied Defendant 7.6 3/22/16
1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 0.6 6/4/15
1:14cv01204 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/29/16
1:15cv00542 Denied Defendant 2.7 10/31/16
157
Markman Decision
There were 112 Markman Decision contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 0.9%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 25.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
11 12 132 2
108
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Markman Decision
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:04cv01507 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.3 10/19/06
1:03cv00283 Markman Decision
Unknown 31.1 10/14/05
1:03cv00283 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.7 6/3/05
1:97cv00550 Markman Decision
Unknown 35.2 9/7/00
1:98cv00080 Markman Decision
Unknown 82.6 1/5/05
1:98cv00197 Markman Decision
Unknown 28.8 9/7/00
1:98cv00336 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.5 5/1/00
1:99cv00301 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.4 12/22/00
1:99cv00904 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.9 8/17/01
1:05cv00506 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.8 12/13/06
1:00cv00751 Markman Decision
Unknown 28.8 1/10/03
1:01cv00065 Markman Decision
Unknown 23.9 1/29/03
1:01cv00077 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.4 3/27/03
1:01cv00077 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.4 3/27/03
1:01cv00148 Markman Decision
Unknown 20.2 11/12/02
158
1:01cv00203 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.4 7/12/02
1:01cv00504 Markman Decision
Unknown 20.5 4/9/03
1:01cv00537 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.3 3/21/03
1:01cv00801 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.8 7/30/03
1:01cv00882 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.5 1/5/04
1:02cv00156 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.9 4/27/04
1:02cv01331 Markman Decision
Unknown 27.9 11/19/04
1:03cv00983 Markman Decision
Unknown 27.9 2/22/06
1:03cv01030 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.6 6/30/05
1:03cv01035 Markman Decision
Unknown 31.5 6/28/06
1:03cv01067 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.7 12/16/05
1:03cv01158 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.6 11/8/05
1:04cv00034 Markman Decision
Unknown 11.7 1/5/05
1:04cv01199 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.7 10/17/06
1:05cv00747 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.9 8/23/07
1:06cv00091 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.3 11/20/07
1:99cv00781 Markman Decision
Unknown 23.7 11/1/01
1:03cv00027 Markman Decision
Unknown 28.6 6/3/05
1:01cv00077 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.7 4/15/03
1:01cv00077 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.8 5/6/03
1:01cv00537 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.5 3/27/03
1:98cv00080 Markman Decision
Unknown 82.3 1/5/05
1:97cv00712 Markman Decision
Unknown 38.0 3/8/01
1:06cv00414 Markman Decision
Unknown 29.2 12/4/08
1:05cv00141 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.3 1/19/07
1:02cv01512 Markman Decision
Unknown 30.5 4/22/05
1:07cv00787 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.4 9/15/09
1:04cv01258 Markman Decision
Unknown 18.7 4/5/06
1:06cv00105 Markman Decision
Unknown 50.0 4/20/10
1:07cv00272 Markman Decision
Unknown 39.9 9/14/10
1:07cv00348 Markman Decision
Unknown 31.7 1/20/10 159
1:07cv00779 Markman Decision
Unknown 30.5 6/14/10
1:07cv00826 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.5 3/5/10
1:08cv00063 Markman Decision
Unknown 30.8 8/24/10
1:08cv00290 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.3 2/24/10
1:08cv00292 Markman Decision
Unknown 28.8 10/13/10
1:08cv00542 Markman Decision
Unknown 19.1 3/30/10
1:09cv00072 Markman Decision
Unknown 17.8 7/26/10
1:06cv00043 Markman Decision
Unknown 61.5 3/9/11
1:07cv00521 Markman Decision
Unknown 38.7 11/18/10
1:08cv00760 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.9 1/5/11
1:09cv00515 Markman Decision
Unknown 27.1 10/18/11
1:08cv00568 Markman Decision
Unknown 39.3 12/19/11
1:09cv00627 Markman Decision
Unknown 29.1 1/24/12
1:10cv00039 Markman Decision
Unknown 29.1 6/19/12
1:11cv00165 Markman Decision
Unknown 25.5 4/9/13
1:11cv00792 Markman Decision
Unknown 31.0 4/10/14
1:11cv00792 Markman Decision
Unknown 31.8 5/5/14
1:12cv01525 Markman Decision
Unknown 18.4 6/3/14
1:12cv00282 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.2 5/14/14
1:11cv00615 Markman Decision
Unknown 36.3 7/22/14
1:12cv00569 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.6 7/21/14
1:12cv00650 Markman Decision
Unknown 27.1 8/26/14
1:12cv00930 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.8 8/14/14
1:12cv01138 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.5 6/30/14
1:12cv01572 Granted Unknown 18.2 6/3/14
1:11cv00908 Markman Decision
Unknown 39.8 1/30/15
1:11cv01025 Markman Decision
Unknown 40.4 3/10/15
1:12cv01036 Markman Decision
Unknown 30.4 2/24/15
1:12cv01200 Markman Decision
Unknown 29.0 2/24/15
1:13cv00136 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.6 12/12/14
1:13cv00473 Markman Decision
Unknown 22.0 1/23/15160
1:13cv02072 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.6 4/9/15
1:13cv00473 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.0 3/27/15
1:13cv00737 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.6 5/14/15
1:13cv01524 Markman Decision
Unknown 21.0 6/1/15
1:14cv00599 Markman Decision
Unknown 14.6 7/31/15
1:14cv01038 Markman Decision
Unknown 10.2 6/18/15
1:14cv01038 Markman Decision
Unknown 10.9 7/8/15
1:13cv02012 Markman Decision
Unknown 23.3 11/18/15
1:14cv00829 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.3 10/6/15
1:14cv00874 Markman Decision
Unknown 14.0 9/3/15
1:14cv00912 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.3 11/18/15
1:14cv01317 Markman Decision
Unknown 12.1 10/20/15
1:13cv00453 Markman Decision
Unknown 32.9 12/17/15
1:13cv00474 Markman Decision
Unknown 33.4 1/7/16
1:14cv01083 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.6 1/8/16
1:14cv01119 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.9 1/29/16
1:14cv01204 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.8 2/9/16
1:14cv01227 Markman Decision
Unknown 17.3 3/4/16
1:14cv01410 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.6 3/4/16
1:14cv01515 Markman Decision
Unknown 14.2 2/29/16
1:15cv00192 Markman Decision
Unknown 12.2 3/4/16
1:12cv00487 Markman Decision
Unknown 47.1 3/21/16
1:15cv00026 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.9 5/6/16
1:14cv01482 Markman Decision
Unknown 18.4 6/28/16
1:15cv00288 Markman Decision
Unknown 18.8 10/24/16
1:15cv00542 Markman Decision
Unknown 16.7 11/14/16
1:15cv00647 Markman Decision
Unknown 15.8 11/21/16
1:15cv01159 Markman Decision
Unknown 11.1 11/18/16
1:15cv00525 Markman Decision
Unknown 20.0 2/22/17
1:15cv00218 Markman Decision
Unknown 26.3 5/19/17
1:15cv00262 Markman Decision
Unknown 24.2 3/30/17 161
1:15cv00634 Markman Decision
Unknown 20.9 4/19/17
1:15cv01031 Markman Decision
Unknown 17.6 4/24/17
1:16cv00275 Markman Decision
Unknown 13.4 6/1/17
1:12cv00487 Markman Decision
Unknown 60.9 5/15/17
162
Permanent Injunction
There were 19 Permanent Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 47.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
2.4
2.8
3.2
2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
3
1
2
1 1
3 3
2 2
1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Permanent Injunction
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 1.9 4/30/09
1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 8.9 11/18/03
1:00cv01013 Denied Defendant 8.8 9/30/02
1:01cv00070 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 5/29/01
1:01cv00203 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 1.8 2/11/03
1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 9.7 3/10/04
1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 6/9/04
1:03cv01067 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 11.3 1/10/07
1:03cv01158 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 10.6 3/27/07
1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 10.0 8/1/08
1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 9.8 11/10/08
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 11.3 3/28/02
1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 15.0 9/29/08
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 5.3 6/9/04
1:06cv00282 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 12/22/09
1:08cv00542 Denied Plaintiff 5.3 11/3/10
1:08cv00063 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/12/11
1:11cv01007 Granted Plaintiff 7.1 3/31/14
1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 8.5 1/5/17
163
Post-trial
There were 118 Post-trial contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 14.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
4
8
12
16
20
1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
15
21
4
119
18
1413
2
1514
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
sDistribution of Decisions by Month
For Post-trial
The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why
1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/14/03 Validity; Anticipation
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Willfulness
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Infringement; Willfulness
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Noninfringement
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 No Willfulness
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Obviousness
1:00cv00796 Denied Defendant 13.2 2/13/03 Noninfringement
1:00cv00796 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 13.2 2/13/03
1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 13.2 2/13/03
1:01cv00065 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.6 4/21/03
1:01cv00065 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.6 4/21/03
1:01cv00065 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 11/14/03
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 8.3 3/10/04
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 8.3 3/10/04
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 0.1 12/10/04 Noninfringement164
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.1 12/9/04 Noninfringement
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 6.5 12/8/05 Validity; Obviousness
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 6.5 12/8/05 Noninfringement; Invalidity; Written Description; Indefiniteness
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 10.3 5/11/06 Noninfringement; invalidity
1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 5/11/06 Noninfringement; DOE; Invalidity; Obviousness
1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 9/24/07 Infringement
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 0.3 10/19/07 Noninfringement
1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 9.6 6/15/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity
1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 11.2 1/10/07 Noninfringement - Literal; Invalidity - Anticipation; No Willfulness
1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 7.9 8/17/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Anticipation
1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 7.2 7/31/03
1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 7.2 7/31/03
1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 6.6 4/23/01
1:97cv00550 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 15.6 3/28/02
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 12.4 3/28/02
1:97cv00550 Granted Defendant 12.4 3/28/02
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 12.3 3/28/02
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 2/17/04
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 0.1 3/11/05 Noninfringement
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement
1:97cv00700 Granted Defendant 12.4 3/28/02
1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 0.1 3/11/05 Noninfringement
1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement
1:98cv00019 Denied Plaintiff 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/17/05 Not Available
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.0 2/17/05 Infringement
1:98cv00080 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.0 2/17/05 Validity - Anticipation; 112; Obviousness
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Improper Claim Construction
1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Noninfringement; Ownership; Invalidity - Obviousness
1:98cv00197 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 12.4 3/28/02
1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 4.9 8/28/01
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Inequitable Conduct165
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.2 7/8/03 Noninfringement
1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 4.7 7/8/03 Validity - Obviousness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Limitation on Damages
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 No Willfulness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Limitation on Damages
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement
1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 6/9/04 Willfulness
1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 0.1 7/1/04 Willfulness
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 0.1 7/1/04
1:99cv00781 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 8/9/02 Validity - Anticipation - On-Sale
1:99cv00781 Denied Plaintiff 7.0 8/9/02 Infringement
1:99cv00904 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 10.9 9/27/02 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Written Description Granted - Obviousness - Denied
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 9.1 11/18/03 Willfulness
1:00cv00751 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 0.2 2/19/03
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 No Willfulness
1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 Noninfringement
1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 64.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 9/15/08 Damages - Non-infringing Substitutes
1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness
1:06cv00091 Denied Plaintiff 11.8 4/21/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:08cv00542 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.3 11/3/10 Validity - Derivation (Denied); Obviousness (Granted); Infringement (Granted
1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 9.4 3/9/11 Inequitable Conduct
1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness
1:08cv00063 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 9.9 8/12/11 Invalidity - Anticipation (Denied); Obviousness (New Trial Granted)
166
1:08cv00063 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 9.6 8/12/11 Validity - Anticipation (Granted); Obviousness (Denied)
1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 7.0 7/13/11 Invalidity - Enablement; Obviousness
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 7/13/11 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 8/25/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 8/25/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness; Evidence not previously disclosed; Improper and Prejudicial Statements; Erroneous Jury instructions; Claim Construction
1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 1/12/12 Infringement
1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 1/12/12 Failure to Construe Claim; Inconsistent Expert Testimony
1:09md02118 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 5/24/11 Validity - Obviousness
1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 9.1 3/13/12 Limitation on Damages
1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/20/12 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness
1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/20/12 Claim Construction; Jury Instruction - 102(g); Exclusion of Evidence
1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 9.1 8/20/12 Invalidity - Obviousness; Improper Inventorship
1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 8.9 8/20/12 Erroneous Jury Instruction; Evidentiary Error; Weight of the Evidence
1:98cv00197 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 12.4 3/28/02
1:10cv00258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.7 9/5/13 Noninfringement - GIP; Invalidity - GIP
1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.1 3/31/14 Invalidity
1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.1 3/31/14 Noninfringement
1:11cv00792 Denied Defendant 11.2 5/18/15 Noninfringement
1:11cv00792 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 11.2 5/18/15 Invalidity - Anticipation
1:11cv00908 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.8 10/28/14
1:12cv00930 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 16.3 2/22/16 Noninfringement - Denied; Invalidity - Obviousness
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.3 3/31/16
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.3 3/31/16
1:11cv00908 Denied Plaintiff 11.1 3/31/16
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.1 3/31/16 167
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.1 3/31/16
1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 9.1 3/13/12 Increase Damage Award Amount
1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 8.6 1/3/17
1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 8.6 1/3/17
1:14cv01317 Granted Defendant 0.1 3/16/16
1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/14/16
1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/25/17
1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/25/17
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 7.7 6/12/17
1:10cv00258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 7.7 6/12/17
168
Preliminary Injunction
There were 34 Preliminary Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 35.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13
3
2
4
2
3
8
2 2
3
2
1
2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Preliminary Injunction
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:00cv00404 Denied Plaintiff 11.5 3/30/01
1:00cv00886 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 3/31/05
1:00cv01069 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 5/23/01
1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 6/7/02
1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 8.1 11/21/03
1:03cv00364 Granted Plaintiff 2.2 8/4/03
1:03cv00402 Granted Plaintiff 7.4 12/11/03
1:04cv01414 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 1.7 1/14/05
1:99cv00833 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 5/31/00
1:05cv00853 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.6 6/22/06
1:07cv00137 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 8/2/07
1:06cv00613 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 11/28/07
1:07cv00137 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 8/2/07
1:07cv00190 Denied Plaintiff 6.0 1/9/08
1:07cv00585 Denied Plaintiff 9.0 10/3/08
1:07cv00787 Denied Plaintiff 8.9 12/9/08
1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 4.7 3/10/11
1:11cv00173 Granted Plaintiff 13.4 5/3/12
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 8.9 6/19/12
1:12cv00613 Granted Plaintiff 9.6 3/27/13 169
1:12cv01491 Granted Plaintiff 7.8 8/6/13
1:09cv00018 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 9/19/12
1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 9/19/12
1:13cv01656 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 3/24/14
1:14cv00270 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 7/10/14
1:14cv00559 Granted Defendant 5.7 3/10/15
1:14cv01268 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 11/4/14
1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 6/12/15
1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 6/12/15
1:15cv00661 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 5.4 2/4/16
1:15cv01031 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 6/2/16
1:15cv01031 Denied Defendant 2.7 6/2/16
1:16cv00171 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 15.1 7/12/17
1:17cv00014 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 7/6/17
170
Remand Motion
There were 1 Remand Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
8
1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Remand Motion
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:99cv00449 Granted Plaintiff 7.6 3/21/00
171
Sanctions/Attorneys Fees
There were 42 Sanctions/Attorneys Fees contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 33.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 6.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
4
3
6
4
5
2
6
1
2 2
3
4
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
sDistribution of Decisions by Month
For Sanctions/Attorneys Fees
The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Post-JudgmentAttorney fees
1:99cv00781 Granted Defendant 8.5 9/19/02 PartialAttorney Fees
1:01cv00401 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/20/02 UnknownwSanctions
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.1 4/13/06 UnknownSanctions
1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 5/4/04 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 16.2 8/11/06 35 USC 285Attorney fees
1:95cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 7.2 7/31/03 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:03cv01067 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 10.8 1/10/07 Post-JudgmentAttorney fees
1:04cv00305 Denied Defendant 5.0 11/8/06 UnknownSanctions
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 16.6 3/31/08 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:05cv00506 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 11/14/06 DiscoverySanctions
1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 10.0 8/1/08 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.8 1/28/09 UnknownSanctions
1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 8/2/11 Sanctions
1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.2 8/2/11 Sanctions
1:09md02118 Granted Third Party 7.6 1/12/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:10cv00315 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 3/13/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:11cv00690 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 5.9 4/25/12 Sanctions
172
1:08cv00568 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:08cv00568 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:09cv00515 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 3/11/13 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:10cv00039 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 0.5 8/7/12 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:11cv00313 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 Exceptional CaseAttorney Fees
1:11cv01007 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 7.6 3/31/14
1:13cv00428 Denied Defendant 3.1 11/18/13 Sanctions
1:12cv00142 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 3.3 7/23/14 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:12cv00282 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.9 10/30/14 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:12cv00451 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/31/15 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:12cv00651 Denied Defendant 12.1 9/14/15 Post-JudgmentAttorney Fees
1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 11.3 9/10/15 Rule 11Sanctions
1:07cv00823 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.7 5/27/15 ContractualAttorney Fees
1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 14.8 3/31/16 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 11.5 3/31/16 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/16 SupplementalAttorney Fees
1:13cv00581 Denied Defendant 6.1 5/2/16 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:13cv01534 Granted Plaintiff 11.9 5/25/17 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 0.9 4/11/16 Sanctions
1:12cv01491 Denied Plaintiff 9.0 5/26/17 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 5.7 7/11/17 35 USC 285Attorney Fees
173
Sever
There were 29 Sever contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 34.5%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 3 4 5 6 9
4
3
4
8
6
4
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Sever
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05
1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 4/13/05
1:08cv00889 Granted Plaintiff 8.0 10/2/09
1:07cv00348 Granted Plaintiff 0.7 4/22/09
1:07cv00333 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 6/25/09
1:06cv00495 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/3/09
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05
1:03cv00102 Granted Defendant 8.3 12/1/04
1:01cv00155 Granted Plaintiff 5.9 11/28/01
1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 1.0 2/20/03
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/22/11
1:11cv00827 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00828 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00830 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00831 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00834 Denied Defendant 3.5 4/30/12
1:11cv00834 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/30/12
1:11cv00054 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 6/21/12
1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:11cv00831 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12
1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 8.6 3/27/13
1:10cv01028 Granted Defendant 5.5 5/15/12
1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 9.0 9/3/14174
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/9/14
1:14cv00340 Granted Defendant 0.5 8/5/14
1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/9/15
1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/29/16
175
Stay
There were 133 Stay contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 49.2%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 3.5. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
32
19 18
9
1614
74
11
1 2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
sDistribution of Decisions by Month
For Stay
The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why
1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03 UnknownStay of Discovery
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 8/27/02 Stay of Discovery
1:01cv00801 Granted Defendant 1.1 9/17/04 UnknownStay Execution of Judgment
1:99cv00696 Granted Defendant 0.8 6/11/01 Pending ReexamCase
1:99cv00449 Denied Defendant 8.0 3/21/00 Stay of Litigation
1:99cv00274 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/1/04 Pending AppealCase/Enforcement of Judgment
1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Pending post-trial motionsCase/Execution of Judgment
1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.0 11/18/05 Pending Resolution of Another Action
Stay of Litigation
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.3 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.2 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.4 11/18/05 Pending Resolution of Another Action
Stay of Litigation
176
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.4 11/18/05 Pending Resolution of Another Action
Stay of Litigation
1:04cv00918 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 5.7 2/15/05 Pending Resolution of MDL
Stay of Litigation
1:04cv00884 Granted Plaintiff 1.4 4/27/05 Pending other litigationCase
1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:04cv00818 Granted Defendant 6.3 2/15/05
1:04cv00418 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 11/9/04 Stay of Discovery
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.1 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:04cv01293 Granted Defendant 4.1 2/15/05 Pending Resolution of MDL
Stay of Litigation
1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationCase
1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationJudgement
1:02cv01427 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 6/19/03 Other LitigationCase
1:00cv00886 Granted Defendant 6.6 9/25/01 Pending AppealStay of Litigation
1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Pending ArbitrationStay of Lititgation
1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation
1:01cv00504 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 1.5 4/28/04 UnknownStay of Injunction
1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02 Discovery
1:01cv00628 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 2.1 2/1/02 Pending Resolution of Another Action
Stay of Litigation
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 0.4 11/27/02 Pending ReexamCase
1:01cv00387 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/10/02 Pending ReexamCase
1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 0.8 1/29/04 Pending AppealAttorney Fees Motion
1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.1 12/27/02 UnknownStay of Judgement
1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/18/05 Other LitigationCase
1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.0 6/7/06 UnknownStay of Injunction
1:04cv00305 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 11/8/06 Pending AppealTrial
1:05cv00768 Denied Defendant 7.4 8/17/06 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:03cv00402 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/11/03 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation
1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.1 9/29/03 Pending AppealOrder
1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03 Unknown
1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 6/14/05 Pending Joinder of LitigantStay of Trial
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 0.9 5/19/05 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:06cv00105 Denied Defendant 8.7 12/20/06 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation
1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 4/13/05 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:04cv00034 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Pending ArbitrationStay of Litigation
1:03cv00527 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.3 2/24/04 UnknownStay of Discovery
1:03cv00526 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.2 2/24/04 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:03cv00102 Granted Third Party 8.3 12/1/04 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:05cv00768 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/29/06 UnknownStay of Discovery/Litigation
177
1:06cv00530 Denied Defendant 2.3 3/2/07 Pending Resolution of Another Action
Stay of Litigation
1:07cv00251 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/20/07 Pending Resolution of ITCStay of Litigation
1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/10/08 Pending AppealCase/Permanent Injunction
1:06cv00197 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/14/07 Pending SettlementStay of Litigation
1:07cv00843 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/25/08 UnknownStay of Litigation
1:07cv00843 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/11/08 Pending Resolution of ITCStay of Litigation
1:06cv00197 Denied Defendant 0.4 5/21/08
1:08cv00334 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/2/09 Pending ReexamCase
1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 2/18/09 UnknownCase
1:08cv00889 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 10/2/09 discovery
1:09cv00639 Denied Defendant 1.4 11/3/09
1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 1.3 8/23/10 UNknownCase
1:09cv00695 Granted Defendant 0.0 11/19/09 Case
1:10cv00503 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/22/10 Pending ReexamCase
1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 5.9 11/22/10 Subject Matter Jurisdiction
1:09cv00872 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 4/6/10 Case
1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 1.5 9/8/10 Pending AppealCase
1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 6.6 4/13/11 Pending ReexamCase
1:08cv00063 Denied Defendant 0.2 9/2/10 Pending ReexamCase
1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Pending Ruling on AppealCase
1:07cv00521 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 0.1 6/17/11 Pending ReexamCase
1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction
1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction
1:10cv00123 Granted Plaintiff 1.2 5/5/11 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:10cv00428 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/16/11 Pending MediationCase
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 7.7 12/16/11 Pending ReexamCase
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/22/11 Particular Claims
1:11cv00165 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 Pending MediationCase
1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 12.0 8/7/12 Pending ReexamCase
1:11cv00303 Denied Defendant 7.6 4/5/12 Claims Against Party
1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 8.2 4/4/12 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:11cv00496 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/25/11 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:11cv00623 Denied Plaintiff 11.2 8/28/12 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:11cv00827 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 Pending Manufacturer SuitClaims Against Party
1:11cv00581 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.4 5/3/12 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:11cv00890 Granted Defendant 5.8 8/7/12 First to File RuleCase
1:12cv00394 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 5/15/12 Pending MDL TransferCase
1:10cv00269 Granted Defendant 0.1 5/4/12 Pending AppealClaims as to One Patent
1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 0.8 4/25/12 Pending ReexamCase
1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Pending Other LitigationCase178
1:11cv00165 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 ConsolidationCase
1:11cv00309 Denied Defendant 6.7 4/11/13 Pending ReexamCase
1:12cv00204 Granted Defendant 4.1 8/7/12 First to File RuleCase
1:12cv00545 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/13/12 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:12cv00547 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/15/12 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 9.0 5/8/14 Pending ReexamCase
1:12cv00931 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 8.2 5/8/14 Pending CBM ReviewCase
1:12cv01491 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 6.4 3/12/14 Pending Inter Partes Review
Case
1:12cv01767 Granted Plaintiff 0.9 7/2/13 Pending JPML DecisionCase
1:12cv00301 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Pending ReexamCase
1:12cv00448 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Pending ReexamCase
1:12cv01525 Granted Defendant 4.3 4/24/14 Pending Inter Partes Review
Case
1:06cv00043 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 4/17/14 Pending New CounselCase
1:11cv00054 Granted Defendant 2.5 7/11/14 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/9/14 Pending Inter Partes Review
Case
1:14cv00014 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 6/9/14 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:14cv00425 Granted Defendant 2.7 1/12/15 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:14cv00530 Granted Defendant 2.5 1/12/15 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:14cv00529 Granted Defendant 2.3 1/12/15 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 2.3 1/14/15 Pending ReexamDamages
1:14cv00617 Granted Defendant 8.6 7/31/15 Pending Manufacturer Action
Claims Against Particular Parties
1:14cv01142 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Pending Manufacturer Action
Claims Against Particular Parties
1:14cv01143 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Pending Manufacturer Action
Claims Against Particular Parties
1:14cv01144 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Pending Manufacturer Action
Claims Against Particular Parties
1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 7.6 5/15/15 Pending Inter Partes Review
Particular Counts
1:13cv00453 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.5 3/20/15 Pending Decision on Patent Issues
Counterclaims
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 0.0 3/25/15 Pending ReexamParticular Count
1:13cv02012 Denied Defendant 5.7 9/1/15 Pending Inter Partes Review
Case
1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 2.5 10/13/15 Pending Inter Partes Review
Case
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/9/15 Particular Counts
1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 1.5 4/11/16 Pending ReexamCase
1:13cv00685 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/19/16 Pending Related LitigationCase
1:15cv00856 Granted Defendant 5.9 9/20/16 Pending ReexamCase
1:16cv00533 Granted Defendant 1.9 9/23/16 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:16cv00056 Granted Defendant 9.3 7/31/17 Pending Reexam; Pending Appeal
Case
1:16cv00531 Granted Defendant 0.1 10/21/16 Pending ITC ProceedingCase179
1:16cv00534 Granted Defendant 0.1 10/17/16 Pending ITC ProceedingCase
1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 0.1 1/9/17 Pending AppealPermanent Injunction
180
Summary Judgment
There were 443 Summary Judgment contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 36.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
3
24
76
148
88
3223 26
91 2 1
10
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
sDistribution of Decisions by Month
For Summary Judgment
The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why
1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 2.2 1/15/03 Invalidity
1:01cv00065 Denied Defendant 3.5 1/29/03 Invalidity
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Invalidity
1:01cv00077 Granted Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Invalidity
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Best ModeInvalidity
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Prior ArtInvalidity
1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 Invalidity
1:02cv00156 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 102(g)Invalidity
1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 6.1 6/9/03 InvalidityJudicial Estoppel
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Invalidity
1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 112Invalidity
1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 102; AnticipationInvalidity
1:03cv00983 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 102; 103Validity
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 112Validity
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 102Invalidity
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity; Content of Prior Art
181
1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Prior ArtInvalidity
1:04cv00034 Denied Defendant 4.8 1/5/05 Invalidity
1:04cv00067 Denied Defendant 7.9 1/6/06 RecaptureInvalidity
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 112Invalidity
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 103Invalidity
1:03cv01035 Denied Defendant 5.0 6/28/06 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:04cv01199 Granted Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 102; 103Invalidity
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Written DescriptionInvalidity
1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 6.7 8/23/07 AnticipationValidity
1:05cv00747 Denied Defendant 6.6 8/23/07 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 102(g)Validity
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 7.4 9/29/08 Invalidity
1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 0.9 11/5/08 Invalidity
1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 6.1 4/28/09 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 5.1 4/28/09 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:06cv00105 Granted Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:07cv00272 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Anticipation-GIP; Best Mode-Granted; Enablement-Denied; Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted
Validity; Enforceability
1:07cv00333 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description
Invalidity
1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 103; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.5 9/15/09 103Invalidity
1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.5 9/15/09 103Invalidity
1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 On-Sale; AnticipationInvalidity
1:08cv00063 Granted Plaintiff 8.6 8/24/10 AnticipationValidity
1:08cv00063 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Anticipation-GIP; Obviousness-Denied
Invalidity
1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 Derivation; Inequitable Conduct
Validity; Enforceability
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 EnablementInvalidity
1:08cv00292 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 10/19/10 35 USC 255-Granted; Indefiniteness-Granted; Anticipation-Denied; Obviousness-Denied
Invalidity
1:09cv00072 Denied Defendant 3.5 7/26/10 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:09cv00072 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 7/26/10 Enablement; Written Description
Invalidity; No Priority Date
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 ObviousnessInvalidity 182
1:06cv00043 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.0 3/9/11 Indefiniteness-Granted; Anticipation-Denied
Invalidity
1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 11/18/10 Anticipation; ObviousnessPriority Date; Invalidity
1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 AnticipationInvalidity
1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Written Description; Enablement
Invalidity
1:06cv00557 Denied Defendant 4.7 8/26/11 102(g)Invalidity
1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Anticipation; Obviousness; Best Mode
Invalidity
1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 4.1 9/26/11 Written Description; Enablement; Obviousness
Invalidity
1:09cv00627 Denied Defendant 4.2 1/24/12 AnticipationInvalidity; Expiration
1:10cv00735 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.0 8/28/12 Written Description - Granted; Anticipation - Denied
Invalidity - GIP
1:11cv00829 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 101Invalidity
1:10cv00258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.8 11/8/12 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:10cv00258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.2 11/8/12 Anticipation - GIP; Obviousness - Denied
Validity
1:11cv00827 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 101Invalidity
1:10cv00428 Denied Defendant 4.0 4/9/13 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:11cv00054 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 3/19/13 Anticipation - Denied; Obviousness - Denied; Indefiniteness - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - GIP
Invalidity
1:11cv00054 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.1 3/19/13 Anticipation - Denied; Obviousness - Denied; Indefiniteness - Granted; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied
Validity
1:13cv00576 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 Written Description - Granted; Enablement - Granted; 102(g)(2) - Denied
Invalidity
1:10cv00658 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Validity
1:10cv00999 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.8 9/30/13 Indefiniteness - Granted; Patentable Subject Matter - GIP; Written Description - Denied; Enablement - Denied
Invalidity
1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 7.6 3/31/14 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:11cv00690 Denied Plaintiff 7.1 3/31/14 IndefinitenessValidity
1:11cv00792 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.3 4/10/14 Anticipation - Denied; Indefiniteness - Granted
Invalidity
183
1:11cv00908 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.4 1/2/14 Obviousness - GIP; Anticipation - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied
Invalidity
1:11cv01254 Denied Defendant 4.6 11/20/13 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity
1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 5.2 6/30/14 Collateral Estoppel
1:11cv00615 Denied Defendant 4.6 7/22/14 Indefiniteness; AnticipationInvalidity
1:12cv00650 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Invalidity
1:12cv00651 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Invalidity
1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 3.6 8/14/14 Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness
Invalidity
1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 AnticipationInvalidity; Claim Construction
1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.1 12/17/14 AnticipationInvalidity
1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 2.5 12/15/14 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 2.5 12/15/14 35 USC 101Validity
1:12cv00569 Granted Defendant 2.5 2/4/15 AnticipationInvalidity
1:13cv00693 Denied Defendant 3.5 11/25/14 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:13cv00941 Granted Defendant 1.2 12/18/14 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:13cv00942 Granted Defendant 1.2 12/18/14 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:12cv01036 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied
Invalidity
1:12cv01200 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied
Invalidity
1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied
Invalidity
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 5.4 11/9/15 Indefiniteness; AnticipationInvalidity
1:13cv00473 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.2 11/9/15 Anticipation - GIP; 101 - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied
Invalidity
1:13cv00473 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.2 11/9/15 Anticipation - GIPValidity
1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.0 12/4/15 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 6.8 4/11/16 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:13cv00453 Granted Defendant 5.0 12/19/16 AnticipationInvalidity; Priority Date
1:13cv02073 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 2/22/17 ObviousnessValidity
1:14cv01482 Granted Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 AnticipationInvalidity
1:14cv01483 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 AnticipationInvalidity
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 LiteralInfringement; Willfulness
1:01cv00065 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 1/29/03 Literal-Granted; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied
Noninfringement-GIP; Invalidity-Denied
184
1:01cv00065 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 1/29/03 Literal-GIP; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied
Noninfringement
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Limitation of Damages
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00077 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.6 3/27/03 LiteralInfringement; Validity
1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 5.2 11/12/02 LiteralInfringement
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 1.5 3/21/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00801 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.6 7/30/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00801 Denied Defendant 3.6 7/30/03 Infringement
1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 Noninfringement
1:02cv00156 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 LiteralInfringement
1:02cv00156 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Noninfringement
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.3 11/19/04 Noninfringement
1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement
1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Infringement
1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 InducingNoninfringement
1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Prior ArtInvalidity; Noninfringement
1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Prior ArtInvalidity; Noninfringement
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 Literal-GIP; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied; Doctrine of Equivalents-Granted
Noninfringement
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 Literal-GIP; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied
Infringement
1:03cv01030 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.0 6/30/05 Noninfringement
1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:03cv01067 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 12/16/05 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 LiteralNoninfringement
1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Noninfringement185
1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 4.8 1/5/05 Noninfringement
1:04cv01199 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 LiteralNoninfringement
1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Noninfringement
1:95cv00545 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/28/02 Noninfringement
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Infringement
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 6.3 10/12/00 Noninfringement
1:97cv00712 Denied Plaintiff 10.4 9/29/00 Infringement
1:98cv00336 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.2 5/1/00 Infringement
1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 5.9 1/11/05 Noninfringement
1:98cv00717 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 6/29/00 Validity; Enforceability; Infringement
1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 AnticipationInvalidity; Noninfringement
1:99cv00570 Denied Plaintiff 7.0 9/29/00 Infringement
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement
1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 LiteralInfringement
1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 Method Steps Partially Performed by the Patentee
Noninfringement
1:04cv01258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 4/5/06 LiteralNoninfringement
1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 LiteralInfringement
1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Noninfringement
1:03cv00283 Granted Defendant 12.7 4/4/07 Noninfringement; Invalidity
1:05cv00747 Denied Defendant 6.6 8/23/07 LiteralNoninfringement
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Infringement
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 7.4 9/29/08 Noninfringement
1:06cv00414 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 LiteralNoninfringement
1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 4.1 12/4/08 LiteralInfringement
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 Noninfringement
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 No Willfulness
1:06cv00282 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 LiteralInfringement
186
1:06cv00282 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 6.1 4/28/09 LiteralNoninfringement
1:06cv00105 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 Literal-Denied; Control-Denied; lnducing-Denied; Contributory-Granted
NonInfringement
1:07cv00272 Denied Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:07cv00272 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Anticipation-GIP; Best Mode-Granted; Enablement-Denied; Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted
Infringement and Validity
1:07cv00272 Granted Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 Doctrine of Equivalents; Literal
Noninfringement
1:07cv00272 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 24.1 9/15/11 Literal - GIP; Indefiniteness - Denied; Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied; Anticipation - Denied
Noninfringement - GIP; Invalidity - Denied
1:07cv00272 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 24.1 9/15/11 Indefiniteness; Enablement; Written Description; Anticipation
Infringement - Denied; Validity - Granted
1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 LiteralNoninfringement
1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Noninfringement
1:08cv00063 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 8.6 8/24/10 LiteralInfringement
1:08cv00063 Granted Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Patent MarkingLimitation on Damages; No Willfulness
1:08cv00063 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 LiteralNoninfringement
1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 LiteralInfringement
1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 LiteralNoninfringement
1:08cv00542 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.5 3/30/10 Anticipation; Obviousness; Literal
Invalidity-Denied; Noninfringement-GIP
1:09cv00072 Granted Defendant 3.6 7/26/10 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Noninfringement
1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 LiteralNoninfringement
1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 7/26/10 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:08cv00292 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 10/19/10 LiteralNoninfringement
1:06cv00043 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/9/11 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Infringement
1:06cv00043 Granted Defendant 5.0 3/9/11 Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents
Noninfringement
187
1:07cv00521 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.5 11/18/10 LiteralInfringement
1:08cv00760 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 1/5/11 LiteralInfringement
1:08cv00760 Granted Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 LiteralNoninfringement
1:09cv00264 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 Literal-Granted; Doctrine of Equivalents-Denied
Noninfringement
1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/13/11 Infringement
1:08cv00568 Granted Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 InducingNoninfringement
1:08cv00568 Granted Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Noninfringement
1:08cv00568 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Noninfringement
1:09cv00515 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 9/26/11 Infringement
1:09cv00515 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.1 9/26/11 Noninfringement
1:06cv00557 Granted Defendant 0.9 8/26/11 No Willfulness
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 2.5 8/28/12 Noninfringement
1:10cv00039 Granted Defendant 4.5 6/19/12 Noninfringement
1:10cv00258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.2 11/8/12 Noninfringement
1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 3.1 9/13/12 Noninfringement
1:10cv00428 Denied Plaintiff 4.0 4/9/13 Infringement
1:10cv00428 Granted Defendant 3.6 4/9/13 Noninfringement
1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 3/19/13 Infringement
1:11cv00054 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.1 3/19/13 Doctrine of EquivalentsNoninfringement
1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 4/9/13 Infringement
1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 2.2 4/9/13 LiteralNoninfringement
1:13cv00576 Granted Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 Noninfringement
1:10cv00503 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 9/9/13 Noninfringement
1:10cv00503 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Infringement
1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Estoppel
1:10cv00658 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.0 1/13/14 Noninfringement
1:10cv00999 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 9/30/13 Infringement
1:10cv00999 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.2 9/30/13 Noninfringement
188
1:11cv00792 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.3 4/10/14 ObviousnessInfringement - Denied; Validity - Granted
1:11cv00792 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.3 4/10/14 Noninfringement
1:11cv00908 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.7 1/2/14 Noninfringement
1:11cv01254 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.6 11/20/13 Noninfringement
1:11cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 2/6/14 Infringement
1:11cv01258 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.8 2/6/14 Noninfringement
1:13cv00148 Granted Defendant 8.0 12/4/13 Noninfringement
1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 4.6 10/25/13 Noninfringement
1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 4.6 10/25/13 Noninfringement
1:12cv00282 Granted Defendant 3.4 5/14/14 Noninfringement
1:11cv00615 Granted Defendant 4.6 7/22/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv00650 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv00651 Granted Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 3.9 8/14/14 Noninfringement
1:08cv00889 Granted Defendant 1.8 8/14/14 No Willfulness
1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 Collateral EstoppelNoninfringement
1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.1 12/17/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv00569 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.1 12/17/14 Infringement
1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 2.1 12/15/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 12/15/14 Infringement
1:13cv01656 Granted Defendant 9.2 3/27/15 Noninfringement
1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.5 2/4/15 Noninfringement
1:13cv00693 Granted Defendant 3.5 11/25/14 Noninfringement
1:12cv01036 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement
1:12cv01036 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 DOENoninfringement; No Willfulness
1:12cv01200 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement
1:12cv01200 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 Noninfringement; No Willfulness
1:12cv01300 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement
1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 DOENoninfringement; No Willfulness
1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 5.4 11/9/15 Noninfringement
189
1:13cv00473 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.2 11/9/15 Noninfringement
1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.0 12/4/15 Noninfringement
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 IndefinitenessInvalidity; Noninfringement
1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 5.0 12/19/16 Noninfringement
1:13cv02072 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.4 2/22/17 Direct; IndirectNoninfringement
1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 4.1 2/22/17 Noninfringement
1:14cv01482 Granted Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Noninfringement
1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 3/28/17 Infringement
1:14cv01483 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Noninfringement - GIP; No Willfulness - Denied
1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 3.7 1/27/05 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Content of Prior Art
1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Prior ArtValidity
1:00cv00886 Denied Plaintiff 8.2 9/25/01
1:00cv00886 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 11.3 3/31/06
1:00cv01013 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 5/16/01 No License
1:00cv01013 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 8.4 9/30/02 Validity; No License
1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 1/14/03 AnticipationValidity
1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 1/14/03 No Prosecution Laches
1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03
1:01cv00148 Granted Defendant 3.8 10/22/02 No Patent Misuse
1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Patent MisuseUnenforceability
1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Inequitable ConductUnenforceability
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Lack of Standing
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Prosecution Laches
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 EnablementInvalidity
1:01cv00203 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.9 7/30/02 Literal-Granted; Inducing-Denied; Contributory-Denied
Infringement
1:01cv00387 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/9/03
1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Anticipation; On-Sale; Public use; Obviousness
Validity
1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Infringement
1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Infringement
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description
Invalidity
190
1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Enforce Settlement Agreement
1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 On-Sale; AnticipationValidity
1:01cv00537 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 1.5 3/21/03
1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 7/30/03 No Lanham Act Violation; No Unfair Competition
1:01cv00801 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 7/30/03 Anticipation; On-SaleInvalidity
1:01cv00801 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 7/30/03 Noninfringement
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 5.8 1/5/04
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 No License
1:01cv00882 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Prior ArtValidity
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Best ModeValidity
1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 License
1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 1/5/04 IndefinitenessValidity
1:02cv00156 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 AnticipationValidity
1:02cv00156 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 Anticipation; On-SaleValidity
1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Laches
1:02cv00156 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Lost ProfitsLimitation of Damages
1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.5 4/27/04 AnticipationInvalidity
1:02cv00332 Granted Defendant 4.5 6/9/03 ValidityNo Judicial Estoppel
1:02cv00332 Denied Defendant 3.2 6/9/03 No Priority Date; Judicial Estoppel
1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 6/9/03 Priority Date; No Judicial Estoppel
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.3 11/19/04 Infringement-Denied; Validity-Granted
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.4 11/22/04 Infringement; Validity
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.3 11/19/04 Double PatentingInvalidity
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 102(e); 102(g)Invalidity
1:02cv01331 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 AnticipationInvalidity
191
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Written DescriptionInvalidity
1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 112-2Invalidity
1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 7.2 3/18/05 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:03cv00027 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Validity
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement
1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Lost ProfitsLimitation on Damages
1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Lack of Remedy
1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Infringement
1:03cv00283 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 AnticipationValidity
1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Doctrine of EquivalentsNoninfringement
1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 112Invalidity
1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Noninfringement
1:03cv00528 Granted Defendant 4.4 2/24/04 271(g)Noninfringement
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 No Unfair Competition
1:03cv00983 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 No Tortious Interference
1:03cv01030 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel; No Implied License
1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Lost Profits; MarkingLimitation on Damages; No Willfulness
1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Implied License
1:03cv01067 Granted Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 287(a)Limitation on Damages
1:03cv01138 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 112Invalidity
1:03cv01138 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Noninfringement
1:03cv01158 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 1/5/05 Infringement
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.5 10/19/06 Lack of Standing
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 LiteralNoninfringement
1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 6.2 3/28/02 Infringement
1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 3.2 8/14/01
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Priority Date
1:97cv00550 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Enforceability
1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 3.3 9/21/04 Prosecution History Estoppel
192
1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 1/27/05 ObviousnessInvalidity
1:97cv00712 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 6.5 9/29/00 No Unfair Competition
1:97cv00712 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 2.7 2/20/01 Limitation on Damages; No Injunction; No Attorney Fees
1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/17/04 Collateral Estoppel
1:98cv00164 Denied Defendant 8.5 9/24/01
1:98cv00336 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel
1:98cv00336 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 Validity
1:98cv00336 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.5 5/1/00
1:98cv00424 Denied Defendant 2.8 2/24/00 Limitation on Damages
1:98cv00717 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 6/29/00 Infringement
1:98cv00717 Denied Defendant 6.2 6/29/00
1:98cv00717 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/29/00
1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 1.7 2/7/00
1:99cv00301 Granted Defendant 2.6 12/14/00 No Tortious Interference
1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 IndefinitenessValidity
1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 On-Sale; AnticipationInvalidity
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Lost ProfitsLimitation on Damages
1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Content of Prior Art
1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 AnticipationValidity
1:03cv01035 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 6.1 7/31/06 Unenforceability
1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 EnablementInvalidity
1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel
1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/5/06 Laches; Equitable Estoppel
1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Inequitable ConductUnenforceability
1:04cv01199 Denied Plaintiff 4.0 10/17/06 Printed PublicationContent of Prior Art
1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 12.7 4/4/07 AnticipationValidity
1:05cv00356 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 1/5/07 AnticipationInvalidity
193
1:05cv00747 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 6.6 8/23/07 PreemptionNo Fraud-Denied; No Unfair Competition-Granted; No Equitable or Promissory Estoppel-Denied; No Implied License-Denied
1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 3.4 11/20/07 Breach of Contract
1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 3.4 11/20/07 AnticipationValidity
1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 Incorporation by Reference
1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 No Breach of Contract
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:06cv00557 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel; No Prosecution Laches
1:02cv01512 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 8/18/08 Relevant Market
1:02cv01512 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.7 9/25/08 No Sham Litigation
1:06cv00414 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.1 12/4/08 AnticipationValidity
1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Lost ProfitsLimitation on Damages
1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 AnticipationValidity
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 1.4 11/5/08 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 Failure to MarkLaches; Equitable Estoppel; Limitation on Damages
1:06cv00028 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 0.9 11/5/08 112Validity
1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 Anticipation; ObviousnessValidity
1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 ImpliedNo License
1:08cv00779 Denied Plaintiff 8.3 7/22/09 Collateral Estoppel; Res Judicata; Infringement
1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 5.1 4/28/09 ImpliedLicense
1:07cv00272 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 4.1 1/20/10 LiteralInfringement
1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:07cv00826 Granted Defendant 17.4 5/31/11 101; Subject MatterInvalidity
1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Statute of Limitations
194
1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Best ModeValidity
1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 AnticipationValidity
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 7/26/10 Inequitable ConductEnforceability
1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 35 USC 255Validity
1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Written DescriptionValidity
1:06cv00043 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.0 3/9/11 Indefiniteness-Denied; Anticipation-Denied; Obviousness-Granted
Validity
1:09cv00264 Granted Plaintiff 4.3 1/20/11 Double PatentingValidity
1:09cv00264 Granted Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 False Marking
1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 2.8 4/13/11 Reasonable Royalty; Date of Hypothetical Negotiation
Limitation on Damages
1:11cv00131 Denied Defendant 10.6 3/30/12 Res Judicata
1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/24/12 AnticipationValidity
1:09cv00627 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.6 1/24/12 Noninfringement
1:10cv00735 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 8/28/12 Infringement
1:10cv00039 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 4.5 6/19/12 Anticipation - DeniedPatent Exhaustion - Granted; Priority Date - Denied; Invalidity - Denied; Noninfringement - Granted
1:10cv00039 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 6/19/12 AnticipationValidity
1:10cv00258 Granted Plaintiff 5.8 11/8/12 Equitable Estoppel; Waiver; Prosecution History Estoppel
1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 9/13/12 Infringement
1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Patent Exhaustion
1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Unfair Competition; Unclean Hands
1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No Patent Exhaustion
1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.1 9/13/12 No Trademark Violation; No False Designation; No Trade Dress Violation; No Unfair Trade Practices; No False Advertising
1:10cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No False Advertising
1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 4/9/13 AnticipationValidity
1:13cv00576 Denied Plaintiff 3.3 7/26/13 Enablement; Written Description; 102(g)(2)
Validity
1:11cv01007 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.6 6/25/13 Infringement
195
1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 3.6 6/25/13 Obviousness; Written Description; Enablement
Invalidity
1:11cv01007 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 3.0 6/25/13 Obviousness - Granted; Written Description - GIP; Enablement - GIP; Indefiniteness - Denied
Validity
1:11cv01007 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 3.0 6/25/13 Noninfringement
1:10cv00503 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Content of Prior Art
1:10cv00658 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 License
1:10cv00658 Denied Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Exhaustion
1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Breach of Contract
1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Exhaustion
1:10cv00658 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No License
1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 Anticipation; IndefinitenessValidity
1:10cv00999 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 4.9 10/4/13 No License
1:10cv00999 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 10/16/13 AnticipationValidity
1:11cv01258 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 2/6/14 Assignor Estoppel
1:12cv00282 Granted Defendant 3.4 5/14/14 Indefiniteness; Enablement; Written Description
Invalidity
1:12cv00930 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/14/14 Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness
Validity
1:08cv00889 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/14/14 Lost ProfitsLimitation on Damages
1:12cv00487 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 5/15/15 IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:12cv00569 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 2/4/15 AnticipationValidity
1:13cv00136 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:13cv00136 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 35 USC 101Validity
1:13cv00579 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:13cv00579 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 35 USC 101Validity
1:13cv00581 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 35 USC 101Invalidity
1:13cv00581 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 35 USC 101Validity
1:13cv00693 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 11/25/14 Anticipation; FunctionalityValidity; Not Exceptional Case
1:14cv00194 Granted Defendant 1.8 2/5/15 No Provisional Rights
1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 1.4 2/24/15 101; IndefinitenessInvalidity
1:12cv00487 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 7.6 3/21/16 Literal - Granted; DOE - Denied without prejudice
Noninfringement
1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 Anticipation; ObviousnessInvalidity; Laches; Noninfringement
196
1:13cv01534 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.8 4/11/16 Content of Prior Art
1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16 Limitation on Damages
1:13cv00453 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 5.0 12/19/16 Anticipation; ObviousnessNo Available Noninfringing Alternatives (Denied); Validity (Denied); Reference Estoppel (GIP)
1:13cv00685 Granted Defendant 5.1 1/19/17 Collateral EstoppelNoninfringement
1:13cv02072 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 4.4 2/22/17 102(a) (Granted); Obviousness (Granted); 102(g) Denied)
Validity
1:13cv02073 Denied Defendant 4.1 2/22/17 No Willfulness
1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 3/28/17 AnticipationValidity
197
Temporary Restraining Order Motion
There were 6 Temporary Restraining Order Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1 2 13
4
1 1
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Temporary Restraining Order Motion
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 6/7/02
1:05cv00356 Denied Plaintiff 0.0 8/27/08
1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/24/11
1:11cv00271 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 8/26/13
1:14cv01268 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 10/9/14
1:16cv00171 Denied without Prejudice
Plaintiff 15.1 7/12/17
198
Transfer Motion
There were 81 Transfer Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 29.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.3. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
3
11
64
1517
7
43
5
13
2
Month of Litigation from Motion Filing
Nu
mb
er
of
De
cis
ion
s
Distribution of Decisions by MonthFor Transfer Motion
The supporting data is shown below.
Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision
1:00cv00457 Granted Defendant 5.0 2/28/01
1:01cv00199 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/28/01
1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 5.1 11/9/01
1:01cv00692 Denied Defendant 5.3 5/1/02
1:02cv00471 Granted Defendant 4.8 1/22/03
1:02cv01336 Granted Defendant 5.1 1/23/03
1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03
1:03cv00398 Granted Defendant 4.8 12/2/03
1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 5.2 5/24/04
1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/20/04
1:04cv00067 Denied Defendant 3.7 8/27/04
1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05
1:04cv00918 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 5.7 2/15/05
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05
1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05
1:04cv01293 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 4.1 2/15/05
1:04cv01423 Granted Plaintiff 1.2 1/6/05
1:04cv01451 Denied without Prejudice
Defendant 1.7 2/18/05
1:04cv01451 Granted Defendant 1.7 6/3/05
1:05cv00201 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/13/05 199
1:05cv00357 Granted Defendant 3.3 10/26/05
1:97cv00049 Denied Defendant 4.6 3/22/00
1:05cv00853 Denied Defendant 5.1 6/22/06
1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07
1:00cv01013 Granted in part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff 9.7 9/30/02
1:05cv00816 Denied Defendant 3.4 6/15/06
1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07
1:07cv00038 Granted Defendant 7.5 9/10/07
1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08
1:07cv00348 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08
1:07cv00409 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08
1:07cv00671 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/17/08
1:07cv00765 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08
1:08cv00016 Granted Defendant 0.4 2/27/08
1:08cv00104 Granted Defendant 4.9 8/26/08
1:06cv00197 Denied Defendant 0.4 5/21/08
1:08cv00290 Denied Defendant 6.2 2/18/09
1:08cv00838 Granted Defendant 1.9 2/24/09
1:09cv00022 Denied Defendant 1.9 4/2/09
1:06cv00495 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/3/09
1:10cv00176 Granted Defendant 6.1 1/3/11
1:09cv00872 Granted Defendant 2.7 4/6/10
1:10cv00419 Granted Defendant 7.9 3/31/11
1:10cv00595 Denied Defendant 6.8 6/8/11
1:10cv00869 Denied Defendant 6.3 6/8/11
1:10cv00902 Denied Defendant 4.2 6/8/11
1:10cv01099 Granted Defendant 4.0 6/16/11
1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 2.7 7/28/11
1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 12.8 5/3/12
1:11cv00598 Denied Defendant 9.5 8/16/12
1:11cv00623 Denied Defendant 11.9 8/28/12
1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 4.6 5/3/12
1:11cv01000 Denied Defendant 19.4 7/19/13
1:11cv01061 Granted Defendant 5.0 6/7/12
1:12cv00372 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/20/12
1:11cv01254 Denied Defendant 11.3 2/13/13
1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 9.5 3/27/13
1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 8.6 3/27/13
1:12cv00931 Denied Defendant 8.0 5/16/13
1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 5.5 5/15/12
1:12cv00613 Denied Defendant 9.6 3/27/13
1:12cv01066 Granted Defendant 7.2 5/16/13
1:12cv01427 Denied Defendant 4.5 6/4/13
1:14cv00874 Denied Defendant 11.7 7/22/15
1:14cv01483 Denied Defendant 5.5 7/8/15
1:15cv00260 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/6/15200
1:15cv00218 Denied Defendant 7.4 1/12/16
1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15
1:15cv00427 Denied Defendant 4.7 3/22/16
1:15cv00647 Denied Defendant 6.1 4/25/16
1:15cv00808 Granted Defendant 4.7 4/25/16
1:15cv00808 Granted Defendant 6.0 4/25/16
1:15cv01031 Denied Defendant 2.3 2/29/16
1:15cv00856 Denied Defendant 5.3 9/2/16
1:15cv01123 Granted Defendant 0.6 4/13/16
1:16cv00197 Denied Defendant 9.0 2/14/17
1:16cv00290 Denied Defendant 10.4 3/29/17
1:16cv00367 Granted Defendant 9.2 3/16/17
1:16cv00056 Denied Defendant 4.2 10/19/16
1:16cv01176 Granted Defendant 5.9 8/2/17
1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/28/17
201