Post on 15-Mar-2023
OFFICE OF COMIUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CTTY HALL
10300 TORRE AVFNUE CUPERTINO CA 950143255
CU P ERT 1 NQ 408 7773308 FX 408 7773333 planningC3cupertinoor
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No 2 Agenda Date October 26 2010
Application MCA201004Applicant City of CupertinoLocation Citywide
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Municipal Code Amendment to adopt a Green Building Ordinance Continued fromOctober 12 2010
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adoptthe proposed draft Green Building Ordizance in accordance with the Model OrdinanceSee Attachment 1 with additional changes as recommended by the Commission
BACKGROUND
On October 12 2010 the Planning Ccmmission reviewed the draft ordinance SeeAttachment 2 October 12 staff repo rt and conducted the public hearing The
Commission discussed various components of the draft ordinance including thethreshold levels for new construction a 1d renovations additions verification optionsLEED EBOM Leadership in Energy ancl Environmental Design for Existing BuildingsOperations and Maintenance and incen ives The Commission recommended that staffprovide additional information and rEsponses to questions that were raised andcontinued the public hearing to October 26 2010
DISCUSSION
A summary of the Commissioris comrlents and questions are provided below withadditional information and responses provided by staff and the consultant Responses areprovided in italics Also each section as pplicable has a recommendation on changes tothe draft ordinance for the Planning Comnissiori s consideration
21
MCA201004 GreenBuilding Ordinance October 26 2010
Page 2
Planning Commission CommentsQuestions on Reference Standards1 How are points accumulated for higher densitysmaller unit buildings
Points in the rating systems are accurnulated per the GPR checklists for singlefamilyresidential and multiple family residentiai projects You may access these checklists on BuildIt Greens website atzvwubuilditgreeno7gQuidelineschecklists In terms of the benefit thatdensity provides for example a project o over 15 units per acre would get 10 points in themultifamily rating system Being close to transit and services provides another 3 points Andmultifamily units are inherently more energy efficient than a singlefamily house so theywould likely earn approximately 10 additicnal points in the energy category
2 Provide more information about LEED EBOM LEED for Existing BuildingsOperations and Maintenance See Attachment 3 for more details on LEED EBOMand clarify what the difference is betveen EBOM and other certifications and whatthe benefits are to allow TIs tenant mprovements in an EBOM certified buildingwithout separate certifications for eacli TI project Are the certification costs the sameor different than other LEED certification costs
LEED for Existing Buildings Operatior and Maintenance is a rating system specificallydeveloped for buildings that are already bz ilt and in most instances predate the LEED rafingsystem The focus of LEED EBOM is pitting in place practices and procedures to meet thegoals of the LEED rating system whicl are to reduce resource consumption and providehealthy working and living environmen s In comparison the LEED rating systems forBuilding Design and Construction Comrnercial Interiors and Core and Shell are focused onthe selection of design strategies buildin s systems and materials that will achieve the samegoals once the building is completed and placed in sefzice To earn a LEED EBOM
certification a project must have at least one year ofoperation data which is used to establishperformance benchmarks against which rerequisites and credits are measured The LEED
EBOM certification is valid for a fiveyear periodKey parts of LEED EBOM are establishifgprocedures for reducing energy and water use inexisting buildings through systems upgrades and fixture replacement An optional creditMaterials and Resources Credit 3 specically addresses tenant improvements by requiringthat owners establish tenant improvemezt standards and criteria that are consistent withLEED criteria Any future tenant imrovement projects must be consistent with thesestandards and criteria for the building to inaintain its LEED EBOM certification The benefitof allowing building owners to conduct a LEED EBOM precertification is that the ownerwould be reducing the impact of the enire project not just the area of individual tenantimprovements This approach is also mre comprehensive than the piecemeal approach ofaddressing individual tenant improvemenis over multiple yearsThe costs for LEED EBOM are slightlir lower than for LEED for New Construction orCommercial Interiors The main savins is in the certfication fees from GBCI GreenBuilding Certification Institute is the certiCCation organization under the US Green BuildingCouncil for LEED For example a 50C00 square foot new construction project would becharged2000 while the same building ir EBOM would be charged1500
2
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 26 2010
Page 3
3 What is the flow chart difference if advelopment went through LEED exterior versusLEED EBOM
Informal Certi cation
The development process for a LEED Nw Construction project involves the following asubmit LEED checklist with building ermit application c submit green review fee ddrawings and LEED checklist reviewed b City consultant e project determined to meet theintent of the applicable LEED rating systE m fl building permit issued g project built per theconstruction documents and consistent uith the LEED checklist g conduct commissioningduring and at the completion of the construction process LEED prerequisites and required byCal Green for projects over 10000 sq ft h receive permit final and certificate ofoccupancy The City inspectors could chekthat the built project is consistent with the plansas they could for all of the City Determina ion projectsFormal Certification
The development process for a LEED NE w Consiruction project involves the following aregister the project with GBCI b subnit registration and LEED checklist with buildingpermit application c submit refundabledposit d building permit issued e build the projectper the construction documents and onsistent with the LEED checklist conduct
commissioning during and at the complftion of the construction process g receive permitfinal and temporary cerhficate of occupzncy h complete and submit LEED certification ireceive cerhfication j release of refundabl deposit
EBOM PrecertificationforTenant Improvement ProlectsThe EBOM process involves the followin a include evidence of active EBOM certificationwith building permit application and derronstrate that the proposed TI is consistent with theTI standards established in the EBOMcetcfication b building permit issued c TI inspectedby City staff at final permitCertificate of Occupancy issued The City inspectors could checkthat the built project is consistent wi Fh the plans as they could for all of the CityDetermination projects
StaffRecommendation on ReferenceSandardsStaff recommends providing LEE EBOM as an alternative to LEED requirementsfor renovationsadditions with Informal Verification The LEED EBOM
requirement can be achieved at tie same levels as the LEED requirements egLEED EBOM Certified etc
On Alternate Reference Standards Section 1978050 the draft ordinance clarifiesthat the decision maker of theaplication will determine whether a project mayuse an alternate reference stancard that is equivalent to the minimum orexemplary standards per the requi rement chart in Section1978060 This was notclarified in the draft ordinance the ommission reviewed on October 12
3
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 26 2010Page 4
Planning Commission Comments on Re idential New Construction1 Consider a threshold level based upori the square footage for residential projects and
require additional points for homes c ver a certain size since larger homes have thepotential to create greater greenhouse as impacts than smaller homes
2 Consider using one rating system ie Green Point Rated and a uniform pointrequirement to simplify the requireme 1ts
StaffRecommendationfor Residential New ConstructionIn response to the Commissiori s request taff suggests using the following thresholds fornew residential construction
Singlefamily homes R1 RHS and A1 zones require 75 GPR points for homes orprojects with an average home size cf 2500 square feet and 100 GPR points forhomes homes or projects with an avErage home size of2500 square feetMultifamily homes require 75 GPR oints for projects with an average unit size of 5800 square feet and 100 GPR points for units 800 square feet For multifamilyprojects with multiple units the requrement will be based upon the average size ofthe units in the project
This system would not use a threshold based on the number of units in a projectContinue to provide flexibility of eithe r the GPR or LEED standard
As shown in Attachment 4 three cities in anta Clara County Morgan Hill Palo Alto andSunnyvale use tiersthresholds based cn square footage Thresholds used by citiesrange from1500 square feet to2550 squrefeet Palo Alto and Morgan Hill also includea tiered system that requires an addition l point for every 70 square feet over the squarefootage threshold GPR uses a threshold of150 square feet for 3 bedroom homes and2600 square feet for 4 bedroom homes GPR grants an additional point or two for homesthat fall below these thresholds Staff suggests a threshold system similar to Sunnyvalesto keep the process simple The unit size suggested by staff are based on the typical sizeof a singlefamily home and a multifamiltwobedroom apartment
Planning Commission Comments on Nonresidential New Construction1 Lower the threshold level to 25000 sqiiare feet versus 50000 square feet for the higher
certification requirements Modify the table to show projects with 10000 square feet25000 square feet as a midsizeproj ct and all projects over 25000 square feet as a
large project2 Provide the of recent new constructions in the City above and below 25000 square
feet in size The Commission felt that the draft ordinance threshold of 50000 squarefeet was too high and would not capfiire a significant number of buildings that couldconsiderably add to the green house as impacts in the region Attachment 5 provides
24
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 26 2010Page 5
data over the past five years and indicatEs that about 31 of new construction projects areabove 25000 square feet and 21 are aboze50000 square feet
3 Consider Formal Verification requirement only for the projects over 50000 squarefeet consider Informal Verificationrfquirement for all other projects this was oneCommissionerssuggestion
4 Consider Formal Verification requir ment for all new construction projects notcomfortable with the Informal Verification for new construction projects this was oneCommissionerssuggestion
5 Consider Informal Verification for all projects start at the lower level requirementsthat the Informal Verification offers rather than the mandatory requirements ofFormal Verification this was one Commissionerssuggestion
StaffRecommendationforNonResidentilNew ConstructionBased on the Commissioris comments staff is suggesting the following changes to thedraft ordinance
Reduce thresholds for nonresidential new construction to 25000 square feet Based
on this change nonresidential newanstruction projects 10000 square feet wouldrequire CALGreen Mandatory 10i00 25000 square feet would require LEEDLeadership in Energy and EnvironmntalDesign Certification and 25000 squarefeet would require LEED Silver certification
Require Formal Verification requirement for new construction projects above 50000square feet
Planning Commission Comments onNoresidential RenovationsAdditions1 Consider lowering the square footage threshold for nonresidential
renovationsadditions to 10000 squre feet rather than the previously proposed25000 square feet to capture renovationaddition projects that could considerablyadd to green house gas impacts and to 1ae consistent with the Phase II
recommendations
2 For the threshold of three out of four building systems require that one shall be theHVAC system
3 Provide the of commercial TIs belcwand above 25000 square feet Attachment 6provides data over the past five years ancl indicates that about 12 of renovationsadditionsare above 25000 square feet and 7 arecbove 50000 square feet The data does not providedetails on building systems involved in thE renovationsadditions
4 Consider Informal Verification requirement for all renovation projects
25
MCA201004 Green Buiding Ordinance October 26 2010Page 6
StaffRecommendationforNonResidential RenovationsAdditionsBased on the Commissioris comments taff is suggesting the following changes to thedraft ordinance
Reduce threshold to 10000 square feet as recommended by the Commission Based onthis change nonresidential minor renovationsadditions would require CALGreenMandatory and nonresidential maor renovationsadditions over 50 of totalexisting floor area and at least 10 000 square feet of renovationaddition andreplacement or alteration of the HV1Csystem and two of the following buildingenvelope hot water system or lightin system would require LEED CertifiedFor building systems require that fcr three out of four systems one shall be theHVAC system
Require Informal Certification for allrnovationsadditions
Planning Commission Comments on Sccpe and Applicability1 Consider providing a grace period oj either 3 months or 6 months for the effective
date after adoption of the ordinance2 No exemptions from the ordinance for planning projects that have received
entitlements since such projects would not be exempt from the upcoming Cal Greenbuilding codes
StaffRecommendation on Scope andAppicabilityBased on the Commission s comments taff is suggesting the following changes to thedraft ordinance
Consider the effective date to be 30 days from the adoption of the ordinance butprovide language in the ordinance thtsays the ordinance requirements on buildingpermits will not become effective unil six months after adoption of the ordinanceThis essentially shortens the time fraine for anyone to mount legal challenges to theordinance to 30 days and still allows for the grace period of six months from thedate of adoption before the ordinance takes effect on building permit submittals Stafffeels that a six month period will a11oNapplicants adequate time to prepare buildingpermit documents after being notified of the new ordinance requirementsDo not provide exemptions from thf ordinance for previously approved planningprojects that submit for building permits after the effective date of the ordinance
26
MCA201004 GreenBuL ding Ordinance October 26 2010Page 7
Planning Commission Comments onVeification1 The verification process should besteamlined and should not add building permit
plan check or construction time due to a required certification
StaffRecommendation on Streamlining tte Verification ProcessBased on the Commissioris comments taff is suggesting the following change to thedraft ordinance
For projects that require Forrral Certification Grant final buildingapprovaloccupancy instead of temorary occupancy if all other city requirementshave been met except for certification and a Green Building deposit has been paid perordinance requirements
Planning Commission Comments on FeEs Deposits
1 Consider a Green Building depositanount similar to the City of San Jose that is leastonerous and allows for flexible metliods of deposit such as use of a line of creditrather than bond to fulfill the deposit i equirements
StaffRecommendation on FeesDepositsGreen Building Deposit Staff is seek ing the Planning Commission s guidance on thebest approach The City of San Joses refundable Green Building deposit is030 persquare foot up to a maximum of 30000 per building or shell permit However it hasbeen found that the deposit amount i less than the cost of certification and is not anincentive to encourage applicants to ollow through with certification The amount
recommended in the draft ordinance is higher but commensurate to the cost ofcertification Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantagesAllow for flexible methods of deposit such as use of a line of credit or other means asacceptable to the Director of Community Development
Planning Commission comments on Inantives for Exemplary Projects1 Consider express building plan chEck processes as an incentive for exemplary
standard projects requiring certificaticn2 Consider incentives to encourage certiEication and exemplary projects3 For zoning code adjustments to Flor Area Ratio and offstreet parking under
Incentives would this be determned and be decided upon under the publichearings for ASA approval
StaffRecommendation on Exemplary StandardsIncentivesStaff does not recommend offering expedited plan checking as an incentive forexemplary projects particularly since staff currently makes it a point to move every
27
MCA201004 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 26 2010Page 8
project forward as expeditiously as possible in the interest of providing excellentcustomer service Staff also belie ves it would not send the right message toapplicants about the Cityscustomer ervice if their plans were held back even if theirapplication was submitted earlier Therefore staff does not recommend this
approach The City currently offers overthecounter express plan checks for minorprojects and fiveday express plan checks for some smaller projects that do notrequire extensive review where appliantspay a higher fee Such express plan checkswill continue to be offered to projects hat qualify
Staff additionally recommends thefllowing changes that have been incorporatedinto the draft ordinance to clarify the incentives processo Amend the purpose statement to note that the City wishes to encourage projects
that meet or exceed the ordinance equirementso Provide findings for projects toquilify for incentiveso Consider a tiered systems for incertives
The following section provides additiona detail on the changes
Staff recommends adding the followirglanguage to the Purpose and Intent section ofthe ordinance Section1978010The Cify also wishes to encourage applicants to voluntarily adopt practices that are more
environmentally friendly than the minimicm required by this ordinance by providingincentives for such buildings and structuresStaff recommends adding the followir g findings in Section 1978080 VoluntaryRequirements to Obtain Incentives to be adopted by the decision maker to clarifywhen projects may qualify for incenties
Findings1 The project greatly exceeds the mi imum amounts required to meet the exemplary
standards
2 The proposed use is compatible with tY e surrounding community3 The project will greatly advance the gc als of this Chapter4 The project will serve as a model forfu ture green construction will be harmonious5 The project is consistent with and wil advance the goals of the General PlanStaff recommends adding the following language in Section1978080 VoluntaryRequirements to Obtain IncentivesAn applicant for a building permit mai voluntarily opt to meet or exceed the exemplarystandards and tofulfill the applicable venfication requirements
28
MCA201004 GreenBuilding Ordinance October 26 2010
Page 9
A Automatic Incentives If the applicait does so in all cases the applicant shall obtain areduction in applicable building pennit fees by an amount set by a resolution by theCouncil as part of the fee schedule
B Discretionary Incentives to be grarted by the final approval body for the planninga lication
a In addition to obtaining the automatic incentive listed above the applicant can requestat the time of the submittal of the lanning application that City authorize the issuanceofone and only one ofthe followilgdiscretionary incentivesi A 10 increase to the maximunc floor area ratio FAR authorized by the Municipal
Code
ii A 10 reduction in the amoun t of offstreet parking required by Municipal CodeSection 19100
Staff is requesting the Planning Commissionspreference on Incentives Alternativesinclude
o Automatic Incentives
Building permit fee reductions included in the draft ordinance Recommended
range 25 The amount shill be set by the Council annually based onavailable fundingOR
Matching grants to offset the ccst of certification application based on fundingavailability Recommended unounts up to 250single family 500 formultifamily and 1000 for no1residential The amount shall be set by theCouncil annually based on avaiable funding
o Zonin IncentivesIncrease to maximum floor area ratio FAR Recommended range510
Reduction in amount of offstretparking Recommended range510
The draft ordinance includes a 10 inreasereduction in both cases
29
MCA201004 Green Buiding Ordinance October 26 2010Page 10
Comparison Table of the October 12 2010 Draft Ordinance and RecommendedAmendments based on the lanning Commission Discussion
Project Type October 12 20101raftOrdinance Recommended Amendmentsbased on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
New Construction
SingleFamily Multi 5 homes Formal Verification Average home size Minimum
Family Residential Option 1 or 2500 SF or less or InformalGPR min 75 pts Informal MultiFamily Exemplary Formalor LEED certcfied Verification homes all other
Option 2 residential zvnes
average home sizeFormal Verification S00 SF or less
for Exemplary GPR min 75
points or LEEDCertified
Average home size5 homes
i Formal Verification more than2500 Minimum
or Informal SF or InformalGPR min 100 pts Verification MultiFamily Exemplary Formalor LEED Silver homes all other
Formal Verificationresidential Zones
for Exemplaryaverage home sizemore than 800 SF
GPR min 100
points or LEEDSilver
NonResidential 10000 SF Informal 10000 SF MinimumVeri cation fCAL Green In ormal
CALGreen Mandatory Exemplary FormalMandatory Formal Verificatzon
for Exemplary
Forntal Verification Minimum
10000 50000 SF or Informal 10000 25000 SFInformal
Veriftcation Exem la Formal
LEED cerhfied Formal Verification LEED Certfcedp
for ExemplaryFormal Verification 25 001 or more SF
Minimum 2500150 000 SF 50 000 SF
or InformalInformalVerification LEED SilverLEED Silver
Formal Verification 50001 or more
for ExemplarySF Formal
Exemplary Formal
210
MCA201004 Green Buil3ing Ordinance October 26 2010
Page 11
Project Type October 12 2010Iraft Ordinance Recommended Amendmentsbased on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
RenovationsAdditionsSingleFamily Multi Singlefamily Informal Singlefamily Minimum
family Residential residential 50 of Verification Renovations andor Informaltotal existing floor additions over areasarea Formal Veri cation Exemplary Formalfi that comprise at
for Exemplary least 50 of theCALGreen total existingfloorMandatory area
CALGreen
Mandatory
MultiFamily minor Informal Multifamily Minimum
renovation Verification minor InformalRenovations andor Exemplary Formal
CALGreen Formal Verification additions over areas
Mandatory as for Exemplary that comprise atapplicable to scope
least 50 of thetofal existingfloorarea but do notmeet the higherthresholds formajor renovationsand additions in
the cell below
CALGreen
Mandatory
Multifamily Minimum
MultiFamil maor Formal Verificationy 1 major Informalrenovation or Informal
Verification Renovations andor Exemplary Formaladditions that
LEED Cerhfied comprise at leastFormal Verificationfor Exemplary
50 of the totalexistingfloor areaare at least10000square feet andreplace oralter theHVAC system andat least two of thefollowing buildingenvelope hof watersystem andlighting system
GPR min 75 ptsor LEED
Certified orLEED EBOM
11
MCA201004 GreenBuilding Ordinance October 26 2010Page 12
Project Type October 12 2010Iraft Ordinance Recommended Amendmentsbased on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
CertifiedAlternate
ReferenceStandard perSection
1978050
RenovationsAdditions Minor Renovation Informal Minor MinimumNonResidential Verification Renovations andor Informal
CALGreen additions that do Exem la FormalMandatory Formal Verification not meet the higher
p
for Exemplary thresholdsformajor renovationsand additions in
the cell below
CALGreen
Mandatory
Major Renovation Formal Verification Major Minimum
over 50 of total or Informal Renovations andor Informalfloor area and at least Verification addifions that Exemplary Formal25000 SF of comprise at leastrenovationaddition Formal 50 of the totaland replacement or Verification for existingfloor areaalteration of 3 of the 4 Exemplary are at least 10000following systems square feet andHVAC building replace or alter theenvelope hot water HVACsystem andsystem or lighting two of thesystem following building
envelope hot waterLEED certified system and
lighting systemLEED Cerhfiedor LEED EBOM
CertifiedAlternate
ReferenceStandard perSection
1978050
212
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 26 2010Page 13
Environmental Consideration
The draft Green Building Ordinance iscolsidered categorically exempt per Section 15308Class8Actions by Regulatory Agencisfor Protection of the Environment of theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act EQA Therefore no further environmental
review is necessary to adopt this ordinance
Next Steps
Staff will incorporate the Planning Commissionscomments into the draft ordinance ThePlanning Commissiori s recommendation will then be presented to the City Council for afinal decision
Prepared by Aki Honda Snelling AICPSnior Planner
Reviewed by Approved by
a ao Aarti Shrivastava
ity Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTSAttachment 1 Model Resolution Model Ordinance
Attachment 2 October 12 2010Flanning Commission staff reportAttachment 3 LEED EBOMLEfDCI Comparison by Global GreenAttachment 4 Comparison TablE Sunnyvale Morgan Hill Palo AltoAttachment 5 of New Constr data over 25000 SFAttachment 6 of Tenant Improvement data over 25000 SF
GPlanningPDREPORTpcMCAreports2010MCA201004Oct26doc
13
Attachment 1MCA201005
CITY OF CUPERTINO10300TrreAvenue
Cupertino alifornia 95014
MODELIESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINORECOMMENDING THAT THE CITYCCUNCIL APPROVE THE MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT TO CREATE CHAP TER 1978 GREEN BUILDING OF THECUPERTINO n1UNICIPAL CODE
The Planning Commission recommends pproval of the proposed amendment to theCity of Cupertino Municipal Code as shonin Attachment A attached herewith
PASSED AND APPROVED this da of 2010 at a Regular Meeting ofthe Planning Commission of the City ofCzpertino by the following roll call vote
AYES COMMISSIONERSNOES COMMISSIONERS
ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERSABSENT COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST APPROVED
Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy ChairDirector of Community Development Planning Commission
214
MODEL RDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 1978 TO CIZEATE A GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS the Planning Commission conducted a properly noticed public hearing onOctober 12 2010
WHEREAS the public hearing was contiruedto and conducted on October 26 2010
WHEREAS the Planning Commission aciopted Resolution to recommend that
the City Council adopt this ordinarce
WHEREAS the City Council conductecl a properly noticed public hearing on thisordinance
WHEREAS adoption of the ordinance vill improve the environment and is in thepublic interest
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS
Section 1 Statement of Purpose
This ordinance establishes a new chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code to create agreen building ordinanceSection 2 Code Amendment
Chapter 1978 entitled Green Buildizg of the Cupertino Municipal code is
established as shown in Attachment A
Section 3 Severabilitu
Should any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person orcirctmstance be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawfulunenforceable or otherwise void that determination shall have no effect on any otherprovision of this Ordinance or the applicition of this Ordinance to any other person orcircumstance and to that end the provisisnshereof are severable
Section 4 E ective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from adoption as providedby Government Code Section 36937Section 5 Certification
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall givenotice of its adoption as required by law Pursuant to Government Code Section 36933a summary of this Ordinance may be published and posted in lieu of publication andposting of the entire text
995822
215
Section 6 CEQA Because this projEct will assure the maintenance restorationenhancement or protection of the envirnment and does not relax the regulation ofconstruction activities or standards allowing environmental degradation this project isexempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA G aidelines section 15308
INTRODUCED at a regular meeti 1g of the Cupertino City Council the dayof 2010 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Councilon this of 2010 by the fol owing vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENTABSTAIN
995822
16
City of CupertinoCHAPTER 197fGREEN BUILDING
1978010Purpose and Intent
This Chapter is intended to supportawhclesystems approach to the design constructionlocation and operation of buildings and structures to help mitigate the environmentaleconomic and social impacts of constructin demolition and renovation of buildings andstructures The City wishes to promote geen building practices that minimzethe use ofenergy water and other natural resources vhile promoting a healthy and productive indoorenvironment The City also wishes to encoL rage applicants to voluntarily adopt practices thatare more environmentally friendly than the rinimum required by this ordinance by providingincentives for such buildings and structures
1978020 Definitions
The following terms shall have the following definitions for purposes of this Chapter
A Building Envelope means the sepration between the interior and the exteriorenvironments of a building in order to provide structural integrity moisture controltemperature control and air pressure ccntrol The principal physical components of thebuilding envelope include the foundation roof walls and windows
B Decision maker means the person c r entity with final approval authority over theunderlying project
C Exemplary Standards mean the stanards that correspond to the requirements of aparticular project and are listed in columr 2 of the chart that appears in section 1978060
D Green Building Checklist means a c lecklist typically with prerequisites and creditsandorpoints that is developed by the aG ministrators of green building certification systemsand used to determine whether a develomentproject can achieve certification
E Minimum Standards mean the minimtm standards that apply to a particular project andare listed in column 1 of the chart in Sectin1978060
F Required Verificatiori means the star dards that correspond to the requirements of aparticular project and are listed in coluinn 3 of the chart in Section 1978060 and whichverification procedures are fully set forth in section1978070
1978030Adoption of Green Standards byPeference
The following codes are hereby adopted by rEference
A GPR Green Point Ratin Standards T71e three following Green Building Guidelines thatare administered by Build It Green BIGa Single Family New Home Constructicn200911versionb Single Family Home Remodeling 2007 versionc Multifamily New Home Construction 200911version
995723
27
B LEED Leadership in Energy and Envirc nmental DesinStandards The following ratingsystems developed by the US Green uilding Council and administered by the GreenBuilding Certification Institute GBCa LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovationb LEED 2009 for Existing Buildings Op rations Maintenance
c LEED 2009 for Commercial Interiors
d LEED 2009 for Core and Shell Develomente LEED 2009 for Schools New Construction and Major Renovationf LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Develomentg LEED 2009 for Existing Buildings OpEration and Maintenance EBOlVn
1978040MinimumRecuirementsOn or after 2011 the City shall iiot issue any building permit unless in addition tomeeting all other legal requirements the decision maker determines that
A The project complies with the applicabLenmum requirements set forth in the firstcolumn of the chart in Section1978060 nd
B The project met the applicable requiredvrification per Section1978070
1978050 Alternate Reference Standards
The decision maker may declare that an alternate reference standard is equivalent to theminimum standards or exemplary standard s per the chart in Section 1978060 if the decisionmaker finds that
A The applicant has utilized an alternate co nprehensive green building rating system thata Is comprehensive and applies standards that are when taken as a whole as stringent as
the GPR and LEED standards
b Addresses a comprehensive scope of green building issues including energy efficiencywater efficiency resource efficient ma terials and healthy building practices
c Includes a formalized certification prccess that incorporates third party verification andd Includes a set of standards that is comparable to the applicable minimum and or
exemplary standards
B The project will1 Meet or exceed the applicable minimtun andorexemplary standards2 Advance the purposes of this Chapte
Examples of alternate comprehensive green building rating systems may include LivingBuilding Challenge Building Research Estalishment Environmental Assessment Method UKand Comprehensive Assessment System for 3uilding Envirorunental Efficiency Japan
Drio22io
LI S
1978060 Standards for New Construction Renovations and AdditionsThe following chart lists the minimum stanclards that apply for new construction renovationsand additions
Column 1 olumn2 Column 3
Minimum Standards Exemp lary Standards Required VerificationSee 1978060
a Residential
i Single Family homes R1A1 RHS zones average GPRrtinimum 125 pts Minimum Informal
home size2500 SF or less or Exem la FormalP rYor
LEED Gold Alternate Reference StandardMultiFamily homes allother residential zones
Minimum and Exemplary
average home size 800 SF orFormal
less
GPR min 75 points orLEED Certified
Alternate ReferenceStandard per Section1978050
ii Single Family homes R1A1RHS zones average GPRrunimum 125 pts Minimum Informalhome size more than2500 or Exem la FormalP rYSF LEED Gold Alternate Reference Standardor
Minimum and ExemplaryMultiFamily homes all Formalother residential zonesaverage home size morethan 800 SF
GPRmin100points orLEED Silver
Alternate Reference
Standard per Section1978050
b NonResidential
i Less than 10000 SF
CALGreen Mandatory LEED Gold Minimum Informal
Exemplary Formal
Dran iozaio
i 9
Column 1 olumn 2 Column 3
Minimum Standards ExemZ lary Standards Required VerificationSee 1978060
u 10000 25000 SF Minimum Informal
LEED Certified LEED Gold Exemplary FormalAlternate Reference Alternate Reference Standard
Standard per Section Minimum and Exemplary1978050 Formal
iu 25001 or more SF Minimum 2500150000SF
LEED Silver LEED Gold informal
Alternate Reference 50001 or more SF Formal
Standard per Section Exemplary Formal1978050 Alternate Reference Standard
Minimum and ExemplaryFormal
a Residential
i Singlefamily Renovationsandoradditions over areasthat comprise at least 50 of GPRmin125pts or Minimum Informalthe total existing floor areaCALGreen Mandatory
LEDGold Exemplary Formal
u MultifamilyminorRenovations andoradditions GPRmin100 pts or Minimum Informal
over areas that comprise at least LEDSilver Exem lar Formal0 of the total existing floor
p y
area but do not meet the higherthresholds for majorrenovations and additions inthe cell below
CALGreen Mandatory
iu Multifamiymajor GPRmin125 pts or Minimum Informal
fZenovations andoradditions LEDGold Exemplary Formalthat comprise at least 50 of Alternate Reference Standard
the total existing floor area are Minimum and Exemplaryat least 10000 square feet and Formal
replace or alter the HVACsystem and at least two of thefollowing building envelopehot water system and lightingsystem
Dioz2io
o
Column 1 olumn 2 Column 3
Minimum Standards Exem lary Standards Required VerificationSee 1978060
GPR min 75 ptsLEED Certified or LEED EBOMCertified
Alternate Reference Standard
per Section1978050b NonResidential
i Minor Renovations andor LEED Gold Minimum Informal
additions that do not meet Exemplary Formalthe higher thresholds formajor renovations andadditions in the cell below
CALGreen Mandatory
ii Major Renovations andor LEED Gold Minimum Informal
additions that comprise at Exemplary Formalleast 50 of the total existing Alternate Reference Standardfloor area are at least 10000 Minimum and Exemplarysquare feet and replace or Formalalter the HVAC system andtwo of the followingbuilding envelope hot watersystem and lighting systemLEED Certified or LEED
EBOM Certified
Alternate Reference
Standard per Section1978050
MixedUse
For projects with residential andnonresidential components each use shall comply with theminimum requirements and verification reqtirements stated above To meet exemplaryrequirements each use shall comply with thE exemplary requirements stated aboveNote The requirements in the section renovaticros and additioris only apply to the portions of thebuilding that are subject to the renovation or addition
1978070 Required VerificationVerification that a project meets the applica le environmental standards occurs through eitherthe formal or informal verification process pE r the requirements in the chart in Section1978060
A Formal Verification A project will rneet the forxnal verification process if the Citydetermines that the project meets or ecceeds the applicable thresholds listed in section
Draft 102210r 1
1978060 and the applicant submits all of the following to the City in addition to otherapplication requirements to assist the City in making that determinationa P1arulinAplication A green building checklist that includes crossreferences to
appropriate locations in the construtiondocuments for all prerequisites and selectedpoints or credits and demonstrate that the proposed project meets the applicableminimum requirements
b Building Permiti Proof of project registration with dministrating body of the applicable reference
standardii A green building checklist that inclu ies crossreferences to appropriate locations in the
construction documents for all pr requisites and selected points or credits anddemonstrates that the proposed project meets the applicable mnmum requirementsand
ui Green Building deposit in an amoun that may be set by resolution of the City CouncilThe applicant may provide the depoit in the form of cash or in any other form that theCity finds acceptable to meet the puroses of this section The full amount of the depositshall be returned upon the certiication document being provided per Section1978070AcIf however the projct does not meet the requirements of this chapteras applied to the project then the Cty shall retain the full amount of the deposit andshall use the deposit solely to advanc the purposes of this Chapter
c Within 18 months of Final Occupancy Certification document for LEED GPR or
alternate rating standard accepted by the City per the chart in Section1978060
B Informal Verification A project will xneet the informal verification process if the Citydetermines that the project meets or e rceeds the applicable thresholds listed in section1978060 and the applicant submits all of the following to the City in addition to otherapplication requirements to assist the Cii y in making that determinationa Planning Applicationi A green building checklist per Sectior1978070Aab Building Permiti A green building checklist perSectior1978070Abiiandii A refundable deposit to defray the Ctyscosts of verifying that the building is designed
to the applicable minimum requirerents The City shall release any unused depositamounts to the party submitting t1e deposit after determining that all verificationrequirements were met
1978080 VoluntaiyRecuirementsto Obtain IncentivesAn applicant for a building permit may oluntarily opt to meet or exceed the exemplarystandards and to fulfill the applicable verification requirements
A Automatic Incentives If the applicant does so in all cases the applicant shall obtain areduction in applicable building permitfes by an amount set by a resolution by the Councilas partof the fee schedule
Drtio22io
2
B Discretionary Incentivesa In addition to obtaining the automati incentive listed above the applicant can request at
the time of the submittal of the plaruung application that City authorize the issuance ofone and only one of the followingdscretionary incentivesi A 10 increase to the maximum floor area ratio FAR authorized by the Municipal
Codeii A 10 reduction in the amount of offstreet parking required by Municipal Code
Section 19100
b Findins The decision maker may award a discretionary incentive of the decisionmakerschoosing at the same time a the approval of the plannulg application if it findsall of the followingi The project greatly exceeds the nunimum amounts required to meet the exemplary
standardsu The proposed use is compatible w ith the surrounding communityui The project will greatly advance tlie goals of this Chapteriv The project will serve as a model i or future green construction will be harmoniousv The project is consistent with and will advance the goals of the General Plan
1978090Exemptions for Historic or AtypicilProjects
A At the applicantsrequest the City shall xempt a project from the duty to comply with oneor more of the minimum standards if eitr er
a The project is on a property that is considered historic for CEQA purposes theapplicant demonstrates that the histcricnature of the property makes compliance withthe applicable thresholds infeasible nd the applicant has made all reasonable efforts tomitigate and offset anynoncompliance with the thresholdsor
b The project includes atypical energyelated design requirements andorpatterns of usethese limitations make compliance with the thresholds not feasible and the othercomponents of the project design o ercompensate for the lack of compliance with theapplicable thresholds
B Feasible means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonableperiod of time taking into account economic environmental social and technologicalfactors
Draft102210
23
Attachment 2
OFFICB OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CTTY HALL
10300 TORRE AVEr UE CUPERTINO CA 950143255 I
408 7773308 FA 408 7773333 pIanning@cupertuloorgCUPERTINt
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTiAgenda Item No Agenda Date October 12 2010
Application MCA201004Applicant City of CupertinoLocation Citywide I
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Municipal Code Amendment to adoptaireen Building Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adoptthe proposed draft Green Building Ordi lance in accordance with the Model OrdinanceSee Attachment 1
I
BACKGROUND
On January 19 2010 the City Council au thorized staff to initiate the public input process i
to help develop a draft Green Building rdinance using the Phase II recornmendationsas a framework with a maximum budge of 25000 see Attachments 23 City Councilminutes and staff report
The goal of developing a Green BuildilgOrdinance was initiated through the Citysparticipation and support of the Sani a Clara County Cities Association Board ofDirectorsPhase II recommendations see Attachment 4 adopted in June 2009 ThePhase II recommendations are criteri and thresholds for new construction and
renovationremodeling projects that im to support the use of healthy buildingmaterialsconstruction methods promc te energy water and resource efficiency andconservation by adherence to LEED Ledership in Energy and Environmental Designand GPR Green Point Rated rating systEms
DISCUSSION
Cornmunity OutreachIn May 2010 citywide notices were mailEdout seeking interested parties to participate inthe Green Building Ordinance Focus Gr ups Green building consultant Global Green
24
MCA201004 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 12 2010Page 2
was also retained by the City to assist with the focus group facilitation and preparation ofthe draft ordinance
On june 7 2010 the first Green Building rdinance Focus Group meeting was held at DeAnza CollegesLEED Platinum Kirsch c enter The meeting was attended by over 60participants The meeting started wit a tour of the Kirsch Center followed by apresentation by Walker Wells of Global Green on the purpose and concepts of greenbuilding and the Phase II recommendaticnsThe paricipants had opportunities to breakinto small groups to discuss and provide input on elements of green building ordinancesIincluding threshold levels rating staniards and certification levels incentives and
implementation strategies
As a result of participants comments 1 o better understand the rating systems underconsideration the Planning Commissior held an educational workshop at its July 132010 meeting The workshop included a presentation by Shiloh Ballard of Silicon ValleyLeadership Group who provided an overview of LEED GPR and the Phase IIrecommendations Additionally David Kaneda Cupertino Planning Commissionerprovided an overview of the upcomingrew Cal Green Building Codes that wi11 becomeeffective on January 1 2011
On July 29 2010 a second Green BuildngFocus Group meeting was held where theGreen Building Ordinance core elements were presented anc discussed A summary ofthe comments and suggestions providec by residents businesses and the developmentcommunity at the focus group meetings i attached in this report see Attachments 56
Draft Green Building OrdinanceThe draft Green Building Ordinance nas prepared primarily by using the Phase IIframework with modifications and adjushnents to meet the specific goals and objectivesof the City of Cupertino The draft ordinince also attempts to incorporate and respond tokey comments and suggestions providE d by the focus group participants The draft
ordinance will be a new chapter of the oning Ordinance and will be incorporated asChapter 1978 of the Cupertino Municipa Code
Key components of the draft ordinance aie summarized as followsScope and ApplicabilityThe proposed draft Green Building Ordinance will apply only to private developmentprojects including new construction and renovationremodeling projects that requirebuilding permits and meet the criteria i n the table of the Requirements section of theordinance
Public cityowned buildings have been xcluded from the draft ordinance requirementssince staff has found that most cities that address green building requirements for public ibuildings do so either through a separatE policy or ordinance Additionally aIl of thecities within Santa Clara County i ncluding Cupertino adopted the Phase I
25
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 12 2010Page 3
recommendations from the Santa Clara County Cities Association that requires newpublic buildings over 5000 square feet e LEED Silver certified in order to demonstrate
and exemplify that such standards are ac hievable Although the City Council supportedthe Phase I recommendations no public buildings have been constructed in the City ofCupertino since the adoption of the PhasE I recommendationsStaff recommends that the new ordinance become effective six 6 months from the dateof its adoption Any projects in whichbtilding permit applications have been submittedfor development within this grace period are not subject to the new green buildingrequirements unless otherwise conditioiied by a development permit The grace periodwili provide time to disseminate inforrlation about the ordinance through the Cityswebsite handouts as residents and businesses plan their developrnent projects Pleasenote that a dernolition permit does not qualify as a building permit application fordevelopment and would not exempt a stibsequent building project from this ordinance ifsubmitted after adoption of the ordinarce The ordinance also clarifies that planningentitlements alone obtained prior to thE effective date of the ordinance do not exemptsuch projects from the ordinance requirernents
Option regarding previous planning approvalsThe Planning Commission may consicier whether to exclude previously approvedplanning projects from this ordinance These projects have received planningentitlements some with phased development schemes but may not submit buildingpermit applications prior to the effective date of the ordinance A reason for excludingsuch projects may be that the applicants had not built in the new requirements into theirproforma Also since projects are requixed to vest their permit within two years of theirpermit approval unless the Council atithorized longer terms for a Use Permit for
example Main Street and the Oaks projetstaff does not believe that this will not affectthe intent of the ordinance in the long tE rm However in order to prevent people fromvesting their permit by building only one building in a large project and thensubmitting building permits over an extended period of time the ordinance should allowprojects that have already received p1auling approvals as of the effective date of theordinance an exemption for the duraticnthat their permit is valid After the permitexpiration date whether the project is extended or phased buildings shall be required tocomply with the Green Building Ordinance
Reference Standards
The draft ordinance relies primarily ori existing rating standards of LEED and GPRconsistent with the Phase II recommendtions However the draft ordinance recognizesthe need and provides the ability for alternative reference standards eg Living BuildingChallenge to be applied in cases where n applicant may propose to meet or exceed theordinance requirements through an alterriate rating system with a forrnalized
certification process and third party verif icationj
26
MCA201004 Green Building Ordinance October 12 2010
Pae4
ReuirementsThe threshold criteria under which projec ts are subject to the draft ordinance are outlinedin the Table1978050 of the draft ordinance While the criteria are mostly consistent withthe Phase II recommendations staff is reommending some changes to respond to focusgroup comments
Comparison Table of Phase II andCupertino Draft Green Building OrdinanceNew Construction andAdditionRenovation
Cupertino Draft Green Bi dlding Ordinance Phase II Recommendations
Minimum Re uirements
Residential New Construction SingleFamily MuliiFamily 5 homes SingleFamily SFR MultiFamily MFRSingle Family MultiFamily 9 homes
GPR min 75 pts or LEED CertifiedFormal Certification or Option 2 GPR Rated 50 pts min or LEED Certified
SFR MFR Z 9 homes
SFR MFR 5 homesGPR Rated or LEED Silver
GPRmin100 pts or LEE SilverFormalCertification or Option 2
Residential RenovationAddition SingleFamily z 50 total existing floor area SFR100K permit valuation or 500 sfSingleFamily MultiFamily addnor FAR increase50
Cal Green Mandatory fo rnew portionsoy BIG Elements checklist or LEED checklist I
SF 100K200Kpermit valuation or 500MultipleFamilyminorrnovation 1000 sf addn
Cal Green Mandatory as applicable to BIG Elements 2549 pts or LEED Certifiedscope SFR 200K pernut valuation or 1000 sf
addnor FAR increase of50kMultiFamily major renroation over 50a
tofial existing floor area f nd at least 25000 sf GPR Rated min 50 pts or LEED Certifiedof additionrenovation and replacement or Small MFR TBDalteration of 3 of the 4 following systemsHVAC building enveloF e hot water system GPR checklist or applicable LEED checklistor lighting system Large MFR TBD
LEEDCertified GPR 50 pts or applicable LEED CertifiedFormalCertification or O ption 2
Commercial New Construction 10000 sf Smali 5000 sf
Cal Green Mandatory LEED checklist
Midsize5000 25000sf10000 50000 sf
LEEDCertified ILEED Certified Large 25000 sfFormal Certification or O ption 2
LEEDSilver
50000sf
LEED SilverFormal Certification or O tion 2
LZ7
i
MCA201004 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 12 2010Pae5
Commercial RenovationAddition Minor Renovation Small projects
Cal Green Mandatory LEED Checklist iLarge wo HVAC 2 of 4 systems are
Major Renovation Over 506 total existing touched 10000 sf permit valuationfloor area and at 1 ast 25000 sf of of1 million pemut valuationadditionrenovation ard replacement oralteration of 3 of the 4 following systems LEED Certifiedwo prerequisites
iHVACbuilding envelo e hot water system LargewHVAC 2 of 4 systems are touchedor lighting system one being HVAC 10000 sf1million
i
i permit valuationLEED Certified
I Formal Certification or Option 2 LEEDCertified
MixedUse For projects with both residential and non NotAddressed
residential components each use shallcomply with the mini num requirements istated above
I
New Construction
Residential The reason for variations frm the Phase II recommendations for residential Iis based upon comparisons with other local cities that have adopted green buildingordinances and have successfully ixrplemented higher standards for residential
developments eg Palo Alto Morgan Iiill and Sunnyvale require 70 GPR points fortheir residential developmentsSeeAttichment 7 Comparison Table of Other CitiesRequirements Additionally staff modifedfhe threshold level to delineate between lessthan five homes and greater than or equal to five homes to differentiate single family and
I minor lot subdivisions parcel maps frcm larger subdivision projects requiring a tractI maP
NonResidential The requirements are fairly consistent with the Phase II
recomrnendations except for adjustmenis to make the threshold and certificatioz levels I
less stringent based upon feedback staif received from major stakeholders and focusgroup participants The requirements aso aim to be in line with the new state greenbuilding code CALGreen Essentially C ALGreen has set the floor of building codes at ahigher level by requiring development rojects to incorporate green building practicesCALGreen takes effect on January 1 2011 and will require all new constructionresidential projects of three floors or less and allnonresidential projects to comply withthe code Cupertinosdraft ordinance also takes the requirements a step higher byrequiring significant singlefamily rfsidential additionsrenovations and minor
additionsrenovations for multiplefamily and commercial projects to comply withCALGreen Staff believes that this requirment is preferable for smaller projects since therequirements are less stringent easier tc follow and require adherence to the new codeonly for a fixture or the portion of the building that is being modified However itshould be noted that CALGreen does nfi require energy efficiency beyond the currentTitle 24 energy requirements
Ii
28
iMCA201004 Green Bui ding Ordinance October 12 2010
Pae6
IRenovations and Additions
i
The draft ordinance requires singlefamily renovations and additions that add or affect50 or more of the existing building florarea to comply with the CALGreen buildingcodes for thenewrenovatedportions ony
For MultipleFamily Residential and NonResidential commercial and industrialrenovations and additions the thresholsdifferentiate between minor renovation and
imajor renovation A major renovation is defined as a renovation or addition that affectsgreater than 50 of the total existing flcor area if that area is equal to or greater than25000 square feet and includes replacement or alteration of at least three of the followingfour systems HVAC system buildirg envelope including walls and windowsdomestic hot water system eg waterhaterboilers and lighting Major renovationswill require LEED certification whih is fairly consistent with the Phase II
recommendations and what some of thE other Iocal cities are requiring eg Palo AltoSunnyvale Morgan HillSee Attachmeitt 8 Comparison Table except that the draftordinance does not require LEED Silve for the highest threshold of NonResidentialrenovations and additions as some of f7te other local cities do Staff is recommendingthat LEED Certified level for major relovations based upon discussions with majorstakeholders in the communityAll minor renovations and additions that do not meet the threshold for major renovationsare required to comply with the CALGreEnbuilding codeMixed use projects will be required to cc mply with the minimum requirements for eachcomponent type of the development
i
ExemplaryIncentivesAn Exemplary Standards section has been added to provide incentives and encouragedevelopments to seek higher levels of cer ification than the nunimum requirements of theordinance Possible incentives that th City may consider granting for meeting orexceeding Exemplary Standards have been identified contingent upon availability of
i funding and City approval These possible incentives includeMatching grants to offset the cost of certification application based on fundingavailability
Fee reductions for the building permit options include25
Zoning code adjustments of floor arE a ratio or offstreet parking not to vary morethan 10 options include510of trestandards in place at the tirne of application
Veri cation
Staff has proposed two options for verifiation to ensure that the development is carriedout to the prescribed standard
229
i
I
MCA201004 Green Buiding Ordinance October 12 2010Page 7
Option1Formal Certification is the verification route for projects requiring formalcertification and would be required cf any new residential construction project anynew nonresidential commercial colstruction project over 10000 square feet andmajor renovations for multifamiy residential projects and nonresidential
commercial projects The formal cetification would also be required for exemplarystandard projects This option willprvide the greatest degree of confidence that thebuilding has been built and is operatirgto the required standardsOption2City Determination is an alternate option to Option 1 Essentially Option 2is a verification route that would oly require that projects demonstrate that the
i construction drawings are designed tmeet the required certification level A formalcertification process to require projects to actually achieve the required certificationlevel is not required Therefore this verification route could be handled through aCify determination process No further verification is required past the buildingpermit stage to demonstrate that the equirement is met As is the case in most citiesthe City will use a qualified consultant to ensure that building permit documentsadhere to the required standardsCALGreen For projects that require adherence to CALGreen requirements the Citywill make the determination as they will with other building permits that requireadherence to CALGreen
The draft ordinance highlights the certification process in detail
The following is a list of pros and con that the Planning Commission may considerregarding verification requirements
4 it d a i 3is t
zrt
s s i51C 7 kfI a rts x xsT
Option1Formal Cert ification O tion 2 Ci Verification
Pros Certification requirement ensures that Reduced cost and processbuilding is built as and functions as a since it does not requiregreen building certification or a Green
Building depositCertification allows building owners tomarketleasetheir buildiigsas greenbuildings
Allows City to track and nonitor itsCAP Climate Action Proramaccurately
i
30
iMCA201004 Green Bui Iding Ordinance October 12 2010
Page 8
yd a x
lt z5 rAx eaF ni
O tion1Formal Certificationu
O tion2Ci Verification
Cons Additional cost for certifiation Additional deposit to cover
Additional cost for deposit cost of the Citysconsultant Irequirement
to verify documents at thebuilding permit stageDoes not ensure that
building is built as orfunctions as a greenbuilding
Cannot be marketedleasedto prospective owners ortenants as a greenbuilding
City cannot ensure that a ibuilding meets the Irequirements
Does not allow the City totrack and monitor its CAP
Climate Action Programj effectivel I
Fees F DepositsOption 1A refundable Green Building Deposit s required for projects under Option 1 of theVerification requirement The intent of tlle deposit serves as an incentive to comply withthe ordinance requirement for certificatin and would be paid by the applicant prior to
Iissuance of a building permit for the projrct
Note The suggested deposit is 2sqft with a minimum of3500 and maximum of5000 foreach singlefamily residential building minmum of40000 and maximum of55000for eachmultiplefamily residential building andmicimum of70000 and maximum of150000for eachnonresidential building
f These minimum deposit amounts are based n typical costs to cerhfy these iypes ofprojects Themaximum deposit amounts are based on th maximum costs typical for a project type Keepingdeposit amounts in line vith typical certtfiation costs will encourage people to follow throughwith their certification and not make forfeitingthedeposit amount a more attractive alternafive
I
g
MCA201004 GreenBulding Ordinance October 12 2010Page 9
FT ical GreenBuldin Certification CostsGreen Point Rated LEED for Homes LEED BDC
1 Sin le Famil 3800 5000
MultiFamil 40380 54700 IOffice 20000 s ft 71650
Office 50000 s ft 97650
Based on datafrom Build it Green US Green Building CouncilDavis Energy Group topWasteorgand Giobal Green
i
iOption 2iFor Option 2 a deposit is required to be aid at the time of building permit application tocover the cost of reviewing verification rE quirementsThe City will hire a consultant to review the plans to verify that the building permitdocuments meet the required certificatioilevel for a project It is estimated that a typicalreview for most projects will require 610 hours of consultant time with an associated costof approximately 900 1500
ExceptionsThe draft ordinance allows for propertycwners to request exceptions from the ordinancerequirements for historic sites and projects that may include atypical energyrelateddesign requirements The exceptions ma vary from the ordinance requirements itself ora particular prerequisite only for a speciiic rating system that has been determined to beinfeasible for the project In cases where the exception is requested only for a particularprerequisite all ofher prerequisites ar d minimum point requirements will still be jrequired to be metExceptions may be approved if the deciionmaking authority for the project makes thefollowing findings
The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the Citysordinances and meetsone or more of the criteria described belov
a It is a hardship or is infeasible for the applicant to fully meet the requirements of thisOrdinance due to a conflict with the compatibility of the green building rating systemwith other City goals such as those requiring historic preservation
b The exception is requested is the mirimum required and alI required green buildingmeasures are otherwise incorporated into the development project
LEED EBOM LEED for Existing Buildings Operations and MaintenanceLEED EBOM is a certification project type that is based upon the actual total buildingoperating performance instead of des gn expectations to maximize the operationalefficiency and minimize the environmeni al impacts for the sustainable ongoing operationof a building LEED EBOM is based xpon 100 of the floor area of the building i
I
32
MCA201004 Green Buiding Ordinance October 12 2010Page 10
Essentially a building must be in operatinfor at least one year for a performance periodbefore certification application and certi4ication is based upon 100 of the floor area ofthe building
Subsequent additionsrenovations may occur in a LEED EBOM certified building inother words the building may rei ain its LEED EBOM certification if the
additionrenovation complies with improvements perrnitted by the LEED EBOMrequirements Staff recognizes that in such cases the applicant may apply for analternative standard since such improvements would still retain the buildingscertification
Environmental Consideration
The draft Green Building Ordinance is considered categorically exempt per Section 15308Class8Actions by Regulatory Agenci es for Protection of the Environment of theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act CEQA Therefore no further environmentalreview is necessary to adopt this ordinance
Prepared by Aki Honda Snelling AICP Senior Planner IReviewedby Approved by
i
i
i
hao ivastava
City Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTSAttachment 1 Model OrdinaceAttachment 2 January 19 2010 City Council minutesAttachment 3 January 19 20LOreportAttachment 4 Phase II recommendationsAttachment 5 June 7 2010 Green Building Ordinance Focus Group
meeting comrrentsAttachment 6 july 29 2010 reen Building Ordinance Focus Group
meeting comtrentsAttachment 7 ComparisonTble of other cities for New ConstructionAttachment 8 ComparisonTble of other cities for RenovationsAdditions IAttachment 9 Cal Green Des riptionAttachment 10 Comparison oCALGreen LEED and GPR
GPlamingPDREPORTpcMCAreports2010MCA201009doc
233
Attachment 3
In an effort to provide more information on LEED for Existing Buildings Operations and MaintenanceEBOM the following is a description of the ratin system in what scenarios it is applicable and howstringent it is as compared to LEED for Commerci 31 Interiors CI in terms of two Tenant Improvementscenarios
LEED EBOM was designed to implement ongoing ustainable practices throughout the buildingsoperational lifecycle The most notable difference in LEED EBOM as compared to the other ratingsystems is the processes of recertification Recert ification can happen as often as every year but mustbe completed every five years This process ensu es that the building continually address buildingoperations processes systems upgrades minorsace use changes and minor facility alterations oradditions
LEED EBOM is applicable to buildings new to LEEC certification as well as buildings previously certifiedunder LEED for New Construction LEED for Schools or LEED for Core Shell The following building
types are applicable under the rating system office retail and services establishments institutionalbuilding and residential buildings of four or more habitable stories It is a wholebuilding rating systemwhere individual tenant spaces are not eligible
In comparing LEED EBOM to LEED CI the fundamfntaldifference is that LEED EBOM requires aninventory of the whole building regardless of the roject scope in order to assess and improve theperformance while LEED CI is contingent on thepoject scope of work The following two scenariosoutline this fundamental difference and how it afiects the level of stringency of LEED EBOM ascompared to LEED CI
Scenario one is a TI project with a scope of work that does not address any of the energy systems anddoes not have any indoor plumbing fixtures or fitiings within the tenant space LEED CI would notrequire any improvements to the existing energy rwater use since the systems are not within theproject scope and therefore not applicable to the requirement The mechanical system requirementsunder CI are applicable and must meet the minimum ventilation requirements LEED EBOM howeverwill require an inventory and adjustment to all th systems since they are within the building Underthis scenario LEED EBOM is more stringent becaueall the systems within the building are beingevaluated modified and improved to the highest relevant standard required Scenario two is a TIproject where the scope of work does include the energy and water systems In this scenario LEED CI ismore stringent because energy and mechanical sstem needs to be consistent with or better than newconstruction standards while water usage needs to be 20o better than a baseline case Similar toscenario one LEED EBOM requires that buildings Function to the best of their existing capacity
Overall LEED EBOM is more comprehensive in its approach to sustainability and in some scenarios canbe more stringent in terms of ineeting LEED requirements It can be considered equally sufficient toother Rating Systems and a viable approach to su tainably within the Green Building Ordinance in thatoperations and maintenance is often more costly and harmful to the environment than newconstruction
4
Attachment 4
COMPARISON TABLE OF CITIESWSQUARE FOOTAGE THRESHOLDS FORRESIDENTIAL MORGANFILL PALO ALTO SUNNYVALE
City SingleFamily MultipleFamily SingleFamily MultiFamilyResidential New New Construction Renovations Renovations
Construction
Morgan Hill 5 2000 sf per unit 52000 sf per unit Addition 250 sf Addition 250 sf
or renovation or renovation
70 GPR pts 70 GPI pts permit valuation permit valuationor LEED certified or LEE D certified 100K 100K
2000 sf per unit 2000 sf per unitBIG Existing BIG Existing
70 GPR 1 pt per 70 GP 1 pt per homes checklist homes checklist
each additiona170 each aclditiona170 m 25 pts min 25 ptssf 150 pt sf 150 pt Addition 700 sf Addition 700 sf
maximum or maximum or or renovation or renovation
LEED Silver LEED ilver permit valuation permit valuation z250K 250K
BIG Existing BIG Existinghomes checklist homes checklist
min 50 pts min 50 pts
Permit valuation Permit valuation
100000 100000
25 pts of BIG 25 pts of BIGchecklist checklist
Permit valuation Permit valuation z
250000 25000050 pts BIG 50 pts BIGchecklist checklist
Palo Alto SFR 1250 sf MFR units SFR addition or MFR renovations orrebuild 1250sf alterations z 50 of
70 pts GPR 1 pt GPR 0 pts existing unit sf andfor each 70 sf over exceed title 24 Part Choose GPR Rated include replacement2550 sf exceed 6 by 15 min 50 pts or CA or alterationfatleast
Title 24 Part 6 by Energy Code T24 2 of the 4 systems15 MFR 0 units Part 6 and HERS II HVAC building
Existing home envelope hot waterGPR 0 pts renovations rebuilds system lightingComplee LEEDND andoradditions systemNeightorhood totaling z 250 sf andDevelo ment 1250 sf and GPR 50 pts minchecklistexceed 100K exceed Title 24 Part
Title 29 Part 6 by 6 by 1515 GPR Checklist and MFR renovations
HERS II additions andorrebuilds to
individual units
250 sf and valuation
z 100K in a singleunit
GPR Checklist HERSII
35
Sunnyvale SFR S1500 sf MFR 3 dwelling 100K construction 250K constructionunits value valuation
GPR checklist no NAmin pts required R 3 dwelling GPR Checklist no GPR Checklist noSFR 1500 sf minimum pts minimum pts
GPR 70 pts required requiredGPR 70 pts
Palo Altosthreshold of2550 square feet is based upon the allowable FAR for a 6000 squarefoot lot standard size lot in Palo Alto Thealditional point for every 70 SF above this thresholdwas to proportionally raise the bar as homes gt larger to achieve certain points for a certain sizehome eg90 points for a4000 SF home or 100 points for a4600 SF home
36
Attachment 5
N
IC
Date10142010
New Construction more than25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
10070054 O APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1A2 33084 09162010
33084
08020156 C TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 1 BOFF 100000 05162008 01292009
100000
08090060 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 1GENCOM 71169 10312008 08282009
09100078 E CITY OF CUPERTINO 10486 STERLING BLVD 26010 11162009 05192010
97179
09050013 O CUPERTINO PROPERTY DVLPti 10900 N WOLFE RD 1SHELLBLDG 279567 08052009
279567
06120042 E PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 10 COMMLNEW 25998 11032008
05020059 C SILVERSTONE S DEANZA R2 12003705102005
05060075 C LANDMARK PROPERTY MANAG 10123 N WOLFE RD 120000 0817200503132007
05080165 C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 25998 01l202006 04302008
05100195 C LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM 10123 N WOLFE RD 2030 93332 0315200603132007
05120104 C LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM 10123 N WOLFE RD 2030 60750 05042006
06020008 E WHOLE FOODS INC 20955 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 75494 07062006
06020109 E LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM 10123 N WOLFE RD NPS3 22983908092006
06030076 E LANDMARKVALLCO 10123 N WOLFE RD EPS4 241443 10062006 04092008
Page 1
Date 10l142010
New Construction more than25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
w
V 1 V UVili nllYlt 1 VIV f1V 1 CLlCJ1 f1UR11V 1 1 VVJV JUC 11VL11 DLVU
01040110 C CUPERTINO CITY CENTER ASS 10050 S DEANZA BLVD
07020163 C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128STEVENS CREEK BLVD
028 I C IEVERSHINE VI ANNIE CHAN I19620 STEVENS CREKBLVD
LU001VU1IVLVV
204224 04102007
25998 04302007
58390
0534046 01032008
3605736
270froloa
Page 2
Date10142010
New Construction less than25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
08050172 C FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 10505 MILLER AVE 1GENCOM 20100 09122008 11192008
A1
Iw
co
080301651 O IMARCI PROPERTIES LLC 10056 ORANGE AVE BLDG A
7
1991 090520082399
05020091 I C ITHE FORUM RANCHO SAN ANTI23500 CRISTO REY DR I COMMLNEW I 2663 I04182005I1107200504090102 C CUPERTINO HOUSING PARTINE 19501 STEVENS CREEK BLVD B 3868 0420200505062008
04090105 E CUPERTINO HOUSING PARTINE 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD A 2576 04202005
05070074 C SILVERSTONE S DE ANZA R2 19375 0829200502152007
05080164 E PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2388 01202006
05030230 C GREGG C BUNKER 1375 S DEANZA BLVD 9672 0223200605092008
06020071 E BUNKER GREGG C 1375 S DEANZA BLVD 1825 0223Z006
04050173 E MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD A 2506 02142005
06010127 E THOMAS E HARRIGNTON 22350 HOMESTEAD RD 1774 03172006
05110004 C RANDY YIN 10038 ORANGE AVE 1705 05042006
05110003 C SAMAND DIANA HU 10026 ORANGE AVE 1932 05042006
06050044 E CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN 15621 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
06100104 C HEWLETTPACKARD 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
06120167 C SILVERSTONE S DEANZA R2
6074 10262006
1859 12062006
19375 12222006
Page 2
Date10142010
New Construction less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07120258 C SCS ADVISORS SEMI SALMI 10050 S DEANZA BLVD 1A3 150 05062008 05082009
08070076 O UNION CHURCH OFCUPERTIN 20900 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 5000 07012009
5150
09060052 O 10212 N DEANZA LLC 10212 N DEANZA BLVD 166NK 1999 11022009
1999
09080096 O ATAM SANDHU 1699 S DEANZA BLVD 1 BOFF 947 04222010
08100189 C DR ROBERT CHEN 20510 TOWN CENTER LN 2130 12232008 05042009
3077
0
09010098 C APPLE INC 2 INFINITELOOP 1GENCOM 10 01222009 03022009
09010131 C AVERY ET AL 10100 MARYAVE 1600 01302009 07232009
09020017 C APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE 363 02032009 03232009
09030076 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE 12 03192009 04232009
09010080 C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD 4044 03262009 04232009
09030063 C VALLCO MALL 10123 N WOLFE RD 1095 258 04092009 07082010
08060234 E COATES SOWARDS 20085 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 13500 06262008 06212009
08060018 C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 863 07072008 11132008
08070133 O MATTIESON REALIY SERVICE20863STEVENS CREEK BLVD 6000 07182008
10030019 C TANTAU INVESTMENT LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 67 05052010 07122010
10070005 O APPLE INC 10300 BUBB RD 23 08262010
10070048 O KCR DEVELOPMENT 19648 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 400 10052010
08040194 C SHELL OIL CO U S 20999 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 16 09102008 10172008
Page 1
Date10142010
New Construction less than25000
r
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
06120166 C SILVERSTONE S DEANZA R2 OMMLNEVN 19375 01192007
07010104 C BUNKER GREGG C 1375 S DEANZA BLVD 1825 02072007
07010191 C TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 490 0409200709122007
07040148 C NEW LIFE CHURCH OF NAZARE20900 MC CLELLAN RD 3148 07112007 12172007
07040240 C UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY 240 08222007 12132007
07090069 C CITY OF CUPERTINO 22221 MCCLELLAN RD 1600 09112007 06182008
05040023 E THE FORUM AT RANCHO SAN f23500 CRISTO REY DR 2130d 11052007
07020114 O MICHAEL SHAKERI 21767 GRANADA AVE BLDG 2D 557 03112008
07020115 O MICHAEL SHAKERI 21757GRANADA AVE BLDG 2E 525 03112008
14
1 25
Page 3
Attachment 6
Date 10l142010
N
TIs over25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Fooage Date Date
00271 C ISYMANTEC
08100111
08110058
09050015
09020016
08060127
07120018
07120020
10060004
8090077
10050098
D9090058
D9060070
D9060071
D9060024
D9060101
10010120
09120135
09120094
10050168
E
E
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
O
C
O
O
C
C
C
O
C
0
C
1 A TI
1 B TI
270000107120080115I200827000
71169 12182008 10292009
30000 03242009 11062009
38811 06112009 08262009
100084 03182009 05132009
30060 0820200810142009
58900 0122200807172008
44524 0122200807172008
34046 05292008
101 080 07222010
55280 10302008 11 132008
524510032010
105227 0127201006022010
103690 09282009
13623010292009
50273 0619200901192010
34330 10292009 12082009
46565 0302201007132010
33625 02172010
56266 OZ02201005112010
97272 07082010
60938 10022008 12092008
10201 TORRE AVE
APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE
APPLE INC 10201 N DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 10431 N DEANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE BLDG 3A
APPLE WC 10300 N TANTAU AVE
APPLE INC 10400 N TANTAU AVE TA02
EVERSHINE VI 8ANNIE CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC 20705VALLEY GREEN DR
4 CORNER PROPERTIES 10101 N DEANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 10201 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 13
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG A
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG C
APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 2
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDGA
TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 5TE 200
ECI TWO RESULTS LLC 6 RESULTS WAY
MISSION WEST 20705VALLEYGREEN DR FLR 12
APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE FLR 13
SAND HILL PROPERTY CO 10495 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 13
Page 1
r
I
w
Date10142010
Tis over25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address
Number
07030006 C I STAR REAL ESTATE 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
07020085 C HUNTER PROPERTIES TORRE AVFJTOWN CTR
07090064 C APPLE INC 19191 VALLCO PARKWAY CAC04
04080255 E HUNTER PROPERTIES TORREAVETOWN CTR
U411UU4tilHFFLtINI IU431 N Ut HNLH IiLVU
05010056 E APPLE INC 10355 N DEANZA BLVD 605010092 C KAISER PERMANENTE 19000 HOMESTEAD RD
001011U C CUPERTINO CITY CENTERAS20300STEVENS CRK
05030110 C APPLE INC 10725 N DE ANZA BLVD
05030165 C AMES AVENUE ASSOCIATES 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE
05080124 C TARGET CORP 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
05110089 C LANDMARK PROP 10123 N WOLFE RD 3000
05110117 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE
06030175 C LANDMARK PROPERTY MANA10123N WOLFE RD 3000
06060091 C SAND HILL PROPERTIES 10100 N TANTAU AVE
06060218 C APPLE INC 10351 BUBB RD
06070123 C LANDMARK PROP 10123 N WOLFE RD 2030
06070129 C TARGET CORP 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
106080090 E VALLCOLANDMARK 10123 N WOLFE RD 30STRIKE
Page 2
Permit Square Issue Close
Type Footage Date Date
1340821
25127
COMMLTI 60000 05032007 02212008
120000 02272007
36685 12032007 01162008
120000 03142005
45tStS UL15LUUb
62130 01272005
48556 04132005 12082005
27737 03082005 06162005
40000 04052005 01102006
25222 04252005 05242005
119926 02032006 02122007
93332 09052006 07202010
29376 03202006 07272006
93332 09062006 07152010
65300 11012006 08152007
27000 09282006
93332 08082006
119926 09052006
38300 01302007
Date10142010
TIs over25000
Permit Status Owner Name
Number
06080230 E APPLE INC
06080248 C TARGET CORP
06100028 C LANDMARK PROPERTY
06120017 C VALLCOLANDMARK
07040092 C MISSION WEST PROP
07010075 C HUNTER PROPERTIES
Location Address
10351 BUBB RD
20745STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10460BUBB RD
TORREAETOWN CTR
Permit Square Issue
Type Footage Date
COMMLTi 27D00 08282006
119926 09252006
93332 02132007
38300 12062006
30668 06062007
120000 01262007
1695168
Close
Date
302007
Lf Urrl I
P 3cn62989
Page 3
I
Date10142010
TIs less than25000
Permit Status I Owner Name
Number
32
08040121
09010081
09030065
nRn7nna
10070081
09100142
09070142
10020045
10010041
09010083
09080108
09100049
10030172
10070156
10070172
LocationAddress
E YUMEEJANGJAEINJANGSUL20916 HOMESTEAD RD
C ST JOSEPH PARISH CUPERTIN 10110 N DEANZA BLVD
C COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 10605 N WOLFE RD
E VALLCO SHOPPING CENTER 10343 N WOLFE RD
C SYMANTEC CORPORATION 10200 S DE ANZA BLVD
C VERIGY 10100 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
C HEWLETT PACKARD TRAININC 10955 N TANTAU AVE BLDG 45
C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 1
C APPLE INC 4 INFINITE LOOP FLR1L4
APPI F IPIr 1f1 N f1F AN7A RI fl
O CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD S
C APPLE INC 4 INFINITE LOOP
O APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG B
C APPLE INC 3 INFINITELOOP
C APPLE INC 10495BANDLEY DR
C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 2A
CDAVE OMARA 10630 S DEANZA BLVD
C JASON KUNG 20570TOWN CENTER LN
C CEC ENTERTAINMENT INC 19805STEVENS CREEK BLVD
O BYER PROPERTIES 10650 S DEANZA BLVD
O UNITED POLARIS LLCOLIVIA J19062STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Permit
Type
1 A TI
Square Issue Ciose
Footage Date Date
840 0829200803012009
282 10012009061712010
3730 11202009 05052010
9194 07092009 01132010
1620 07202009 09012009
1800 04222008 02092009
180 0416200807242008
6059 07012009 01272010
2644 0527200906142010
nRiainnR nqmRinn
100 08242010
1676 10222009 08032010
23000 11092009
640 031720103262010
5000 01112010
2577 07012009 01272010
5721 10212009
1097 10062009 0111 2010
14652 04092010 05112010
3610 09292010
4210 092812010
Page 1
i
rn
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
08090007
10030027
08010037
10030165
10070080
10070119
10040073
07100194
10050161
nonnn
10020135
10040029
10030127
10010075
10010077
10010078
09090175
09070129
09110101
10020100
10010073
09060005
09060D54
09040123
08100172
C
C
C
C
O
O
O
E
C
O
C
C
C
O
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
O
C
C
LOUIS CHIARAMONTE JR 10123 N WOLFE RD FC9
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPAN 11111 N WOLFE RD STE C
APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE SHOOT 12
BYER PROPERTIES 10580 S DEANZA BLVD
CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
THOMAS E HARRINGTON TRU 22352 HOMESTEAD RD
DENNIS S CHEN DDS 10430 S DE ANZA BLVD STE 185
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST 19920 OLIVEWOOD ST
BAY 18 LLC COOLIVIA JANG 20956 HOMESTEAD RD STE H
11DIIwl 4lAQl C 11C AA17A 1r1CTC 7A1
v vru u v v v
CUPERTINO CITY CENTER BLD 20400 STEVENS CREEK STE 370
APPLE INC 10400 RIDGEVIEW CT
MIHYE CHOI 19110 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450STEVENS CREEK BLVD FLi
LAB 126 20450STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
JOYCE SHEU 19068STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE FLR 2
APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2
DERRICK KOO 20568 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10212 N DEANZA LLC 10212 N DEANZA BLVD
MARK OSBORN 21710STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1
APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE
1 B TI 593 12042008 03202009
162 05242010 0616l201 U
12730 02292008 10202008
960 04092010 06252010
6400 07272010
990 10122010
1452 05142010
155 02042008
108 06042010 06292010
uviLVVvivvviv
1000 03232010
1275 04212010 06022010
1103 04052010 06292010
960 01192010 02222010
1961 02052010
2790 02052010 08052010
12000 12222009
1600 08102009 01132010
520 1118200905262010
50 0324201007082010
3852 02092010 06292010
1957 06252009 09242009
2864 11022009
800 0422200906262009
609 12102008 12232008
Page 2
Date10142010
TIs less thaa 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
I
10030050 C APPLE INC 10725 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1 1 B TI 898 03092010 03252010
08080142 C APPLE INC 10431 N DEANZA BLVD 350 08192008 10162008
09040098 C APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD 470 06152009 07202009
10040116 O APPLE INC 3 INFINITELOOP 2097 07202010
1004011 O APPLE INC 6 INFINITE LOOP 4046 07202010
09080171 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 473 09252009 10142009
09080146 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1 12540 09302009 01222040
09050161 E MANDAR DANGE 20640 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2756 06232009 02112010
08090166 C MANDAR DANGE 20830 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 20632 12232008 04272009
nnnnu n riipRTininriTV rFNTFR 71df1f1 CTFNICRFFK RI Il STF rifl 1R1Q111
09010104 C CHARLES SCHWAB CO INC 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE 6628 03202009 07272009
08080059 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 120 08072008 09052008
08080064 E APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR24 22914 0923l200803242009
07120060 C APPLE INC 10627 BANDLEY DR 2500 12102007 01042008
08120027 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 1560 01092009 03022009
08120107 C APPLE INC 19310 PRUNERIDGE AVE 1050 12162008 12232008
10070023 O APPLE INC 20605 LAZANEO DR 17188 09102010
10070029 C APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 242 08192010 10072010
10080064 O APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA BLVD 1528 10142010
10080065 O APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA BLVD 1870 09212010
10080067 O APPLE tNC 20650 VALLEYGREEN DR 5180 09102010
10040001 C APPLE INC 10355 N DE ANZA BLVD 1044 0401201009202010
10050131 C APPLE INC 6 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 380 06032010 08032010
10070033 C APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1 2212 0909201009172010
10070015 O APPLE INC 20705VALLEY GREEN DR FLR 1 533 08032010
Page 3
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
10070016 O APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 1 1 B TI 234 08022010
10070079 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 375 0728201009142010
09120011 C APPLE INC 6 INFINITELOP 1ST FLR 10 12012009 04302010
10010124 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 11857 03162010 07082010
09110145 O APPLE INC 2INFINITE LOOP 226 04192010
09110146 O APPLE INC 10355 N DEANZA BLVD 8900 01252010
09110061 C APPLE INC 20705VALLEYGREEN DR FLR 2 3500 12142009 01132010
09120137 O APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP 1990 01282010
10060040 C APPLE INC 10495 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 3 500 06082010 07092010
n 1f1f17117d 1 APPI F I1I 1 IhIFINIITF I f1f1P 17RR nfif1Al7f11l1
10080212 O APPLE INC 20650VALLEY GREEN DR 4807 10112010
O 08120108 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP 18864 01082009 OS052009
10060171 O APPLE INC 10495 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 3 180 07202010
10080175 O APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA FLR 2 2878 09202010
10040140 O APPLE INC 1 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 N 4176 04222010
08030133 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 1830 0501200807312008
08030056 E APPLE INC 10400 N TANTAU AVE 1390 04022008
09090062 C APPLE INC 10351 BUBB RD 263 1012200901042010
08050175 C APPLE INC 20625 LAZANEO DR 759 0609200807302008
08020129 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT RC08 BSIDE 1100 0221200804172008
07120007 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 14400 0107200802112008
07120063 E APPLE INC 10495 N DEANZA BLVD 2 01032008
08060120 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 5171 07032008 10082008
08060122 C APPLE INC 10431 N DEANZA BLVD 18993 07102008 09242008
09060040 C APPLE INC 10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 1 17681 07022009 01192010
Page 4
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
09010054
09010059
09060115
09050033
09050074
09060083
09050151
09060025
nnnannQQ
09090005
C 09100034
09070013
09040121
08070155
08090036
08090112
08090177
10080089
08090196
08100066
09040122
09050020
09100186
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
C
O
E
C
C
C
C
4PPLE INC
qPPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
ADDI C IAI
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
RAJ MEKA
ROBERT CAMARDA
AMIR KHOJASTEH
VARDY SHTEIN
DEANZA MEDICAL LLC
VERDE TEA ASSOCIATES
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
10450 RIDGEVIEW CT FLR 2
10400 RIDGEVIEWCT
3 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 1
2 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR1FLF
10495 N DEANZA BLVD
10201 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
10500 N DEANZA BLVD FLR 1
aininnTG nna
10300 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
2 INFINITE LOOP
19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG B
10123 N WOLFE RD FC8
20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
10123 N WOLFE RD F C1
10215 S DEANZA BLVD
10430 S DE ANZA BLVD STE 210
19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 18
2 INFINITE LOOP
10441 BANDLEY DR
4 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
1 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1
5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 3
1 B TI 1015 03032009 03052009
894 0120200902022009
894 0312200904212009
22568 087200908042010
526 06242009 06262009
6772 06222009 07202010
695 08262009 01072010
3466 05262009 06172009
7228 06222009 01192010
an171R7l1f1Q11R7111
3760 09232009 05262010
1 035 10062009 10292009
11373 08192009 10112010
810 01122010 0712J2010
4920 0722200810162008
703 1219200807222009
1803 1219200805192009
455 10072008 11252008
1555 0217200909232009
100 09282010
9686 1021200806102009
1300 12192008 12232008
1384 0514200906292009
717 0505200907082009
200 12142009 01132010
Page 5
Date10142010
TIs less than25000
n
I
0
Permit Status Owner Name
Number
10080097
08070017
09040044
10080103
10080046
09120022
09120060
10030129
f1Gld1f1dR
08060010
110018I110023
07110167
08100150
10050067
09080057
09040077
08090226
09090086
09100213
09070037
08010039
LocationAddress Permit
Type
1 B TI
Square Issue Close
Fooage Date Date
O CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C CIVIC PARK CUPERTINO LLC 20560TOWN CENTER LN
C CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
O APPLE INC 10460 BANDLEY DR
C APPLE INC 20300 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
O APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOPFLR 14
E APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE
C APPLE INC 2 INfINiTE LOOP FLR 1
F APPI F INC 1RRRf1 Hf1MFSTFAII RIl
C EVERTRUST BANK 20510 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
C CHINA TRUST BANK 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C APPLE INC 10480 RIDGEVIEW CT
C APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COfV 10600 N DEANZA BLVD 1 ST FLR
C VICKIE PENG 10036 ORANGE AVE
C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DEANZA BLVD STE 250
O WOODMONT REAL ESTATE SEI 10201 TORRE AVE FLR 3 LOBBY
C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C CHRIS MARCHESE 10101 BUBB RD
C DURECT CORPORATION 10260 BUBB RD
C ARC SIGHT 4 RESULTS WAY3
C FUJIO WATANABE 10789 S BLANEY AVE
C PROMETHEUS 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCT 20130STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Page 6
47 08262010
1166 08192008 09222008
2800 04302009 06102009
720 05222008 03132009
2826 09092010
1323 08052fl1008312010
2029 12032009
1318 12l102009 06302010
76 04072010 05052010
1R1lrf1f1G11Mq
389 07112008
6596 05192009 09172009
974 02012010 07082010
2230 11042009 01082010
7000 10142008
150 12J032007 01102008
2500 10232008 121112008
740 06172010
1476 10022009 01052010
1430 0415200905152009
192 09l30200812032008
534 0914200910202009
100 0112201003252010
2492 07212009 08192009
1216 01282008 02202008
TIs less than 25000
Date10142010
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
190
i
09060039
10050151
08070165
08070143
09080242
09080243
09100076
f1Q17f111 Q
10080108I10080109
1100861
08100130
08110014
08120101
09010108
10030008
08110061
08070067
E
C
O
O
C
O
O
O
C
f
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
O
C
C
PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 19949 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WAYNE GONG 19968 HOMESTEAD RD
METROPOLITAN LIFE INS CO 20573 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
EMBARCADERO CAPITAL PART 6 RESULTS WAY
MITCH KANE 20725VALLEY GREEN DR
MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
MENLO EQUITIES 10080 N WOLFE RD FLOOR 13
MENLO EQUITIES 10050 N WOLFE RD FLOOR13
STAR ONE CREDIT UNION 10991 N DEANZA BLVD
TANTAI I INFSTIIAFIITCI I 1flQflfl N TAPIT01I0F
TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE
CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
FRED CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
JP MORGAN CHASE 10250 S DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 20705VALLEYGREEN DR
PETER CHANG 10123 N WOLFE RD FC12
CATHAY BANK 10480 S DE ANZA BLVD
PROMETHEUS 20400STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
PHIL LAO 10123 N WOLFE RD STE FC7
MP TORRE PLAZAJV LLC 10201 TORRE AVE
SHOEFAIR PROPERTIES AND T 10139 S DEANZA BLVD
ZHONG XIAM TAO 20530TOWN CENTER LN
EAST WEST BANK 10001 N DE ANZA BLVD STE 100
TAKAKI BAKERY 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
KIMCO REALTY CORP 10773 N WOLFE RD
1 B TI 760 09292008 05162009
63 04072009 06232009
5020 OS272009
20 05192010
900 07232008
1273 08202008
2491 10062009
3527 10062Q09
40 10262009 01062010
7R 177R7111f1717f1f1
1819 09032008 09032008
2232 09092010
1657 09092010
5031 10212009 07282010
679 01062009 02272009
625 10132008 01162009
2524 06182008 06022009
3644 09122008 01062009
916 11142008 05232009
375 02032009
489 01282009 01072010
1146 04162009 O6172009
800 03182010
426 02092009 03022009
290 07102008 07302008
Page 7
TIs less than 25000
N
C3l
N
Date10142010
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
09030086 C ANNE PANOWICZ 10919 N WOLFE RD 16TI 1162 04242009 06012009
08090108 C VALLCO MALL 10123 N WOLFE RD 1500 10102008 11202008
07120083 E SHAWN TAHER 8HENRY LAI 21267 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 31 400 02252008
08040087 C JIMMY CHEN 10123 N WOLFE RD 2021 729 06112008 07302008
08040150 C PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT ER 18922 FORGE DR STE B 196 05072008 09112008
09020106 C MP TORRE PLAZAJV LLC 10201 TORRE AVE 2ND FLR 600 03252009 02262010
08050167 G HOMELAND MANAGEMENT GRt21265 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 20 1070 08052008 04142009
467121
IUyIIU18lJ1JVJGtf1VrlUtCK1 IIVIJ Jl IU ILU IV UC NIVLII DLVUIIC 11 1 LOOU VL1lLV IU VOJ1LVIU 1
70007 C LITTLE TREE MONTESSORI INC20100 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10082 C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 2B
10126 I G IAPPLE INC 10475 BANDLEY DR 5
08040184 C WHOLE FOODS INC 20955 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10070059 O CVS PHARMACY M DECARVAL 10455 S DE ANZA BLVD
08040179 C EVERSHINE 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10050140 O MARINA FOODS 10122 BANDLEY DR STEC
07050029 6 ARIEF PASHA 19062 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
1 H TI
1 M TI
i
5719 08202009 10082009
4893 07012009 01272010
13492
900 0407200908262009
900
5000 05132008
889 10042010
11875 07072008 12162008
662 07272010
983 06182007 03242010
19409
Page 8
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07070108
07070174
07080266
07040226
07060066
05120145
05090217
06100085
06020099
f151f1lri1
I05020126cr
C nannnna
5030166
7050015
D7100005
D5040062
D5110136
D7050014
D6120114
D6020171
D6070186
07100042
110032
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
E
r
C
E
C
E
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
E
C
SOUTH BAY INVESTMENT GRO 19748 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CURRY HOUSE 10350 S DEANZA BLVD
MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ECI TWO RESULTS LLC8CB Rli 2 RESULTS WAY 2ND FLOOR
VU 8BAOTRAM TRUONG 19501 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1
J C PENNEY PROPERTIES INC 10150 N WOLFE RD
GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY
TIANLHUI TEMPLE 7811 ORION LN
PROMETHEUS 20450STEVENS CRK 250
PRnMFTHFI IS L451STFVFNS CRKffl
TREND MICRO 10101 N DEANZA BLVD
WAYNE GONG 19944 HOMESTEAD RD
GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY
NUTRITION RESTAURANT 10300 N TANTAU AVE
jNUTRITION RESTAURANT 10300 N TANTAU AVE
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19410 HOMESTEAD RD 43
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETf PACKARD CO 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE 44
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
ROCKWOOD CAPITAL LLC 10200 N TANTAU AVE
CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPAI 10023 S DEANZA BLVD
CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPAI 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD
GROSWENOR 2 RESULTS WAY FL 2ND
Page 9
COMMLTI 900 083020U711272007
2933 10052007 03172008
2547 10122007 12132007
15561 06012007 08292007
1289 06082007
3400 04052006
2500 11042005 12212005
445 10122006
12501 03062006
1 f1 f1111f1R19f1f1R
10893 02J1712005 08082005
64 03032006
2000 03162005
263 05212007
50 10102007
1200 04122005
300 12212005 09292006
676 0620200710132007
400 01122007
306 03282006 09292006
300 08302006
639 12182007 01222009
2097 08062007 01312008
1306 0629200707312008
422 11162005
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
07090073 C GARY LESSING 10061 BUBB RD COMMLTI 247 11142007 06182008
05010040 E GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY 21184 02172005
04080220 C PEETS COFFEE TEA 20807STEVENS CRK 200 1834 01042005 04182005
05010057 C BANDLEY CENTER INC 10268 BANDLEY DR 10000 08012005 03282006
05050041 E DE ANZA PROPERTIES 10150 TORRE AVE 10115 06162005
05010067 C CALI FINANCIAUHAIR SALON 10475 S DEANZA BLVD 1237 01112005 04042005
04100065 C TACO DEL MAR 21267 STEVENS CRK 320 1378 01042005 04142005
04120016 E PANERA BREAD INC 20807 STEVENS CRK 100 5160 05092005
04120009 E SUNNYVIEW LUTHERSAN HOM 22445 CUPERTINO RD 280 04142005
1d17f1f1 PR1AFTIIFIIC RFA1 FCTATG 7fldflflCTFFIC IC RI 111f1l1 RI1Anllll7nnnzln7nn
04120088 C LUCKY RESTAURANT 10271 TORRE AVE 2020 03142005 01182006
05010010 C POTSTICKER RESTAURANT 19634STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2535 08182005 03232006
05010066 C PROMETHEUS 2ND FL245 20400STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3650 01112005 08242005
05020179 C HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANl 11000 WOLFE RD 9611 04152005
05030026 C GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY 600 03022005
05020170 C DOLLINGER DEANZA ASSOC 1601 S DEANZA BLV 150 5570 04202005 11022005
05030013 C PET FOOD FIVE PAW BAKERYJ 10251 S DEANZA BLVD 2800 03J012005 03312005
05030016 E MARCUS MILLCHAP 10133 S DEANZA BLVD 1874 04062005
05030022 C RITE AID CORP 20580 HOMESTEAD RD 3417 06062005 01262006
05030102 C AARON BROTHERS 20600STEVENS CREEK BLVD 5862 04042005 05232005
05030115 C CUPERTINO FINANCIAL CENTE 10080 N WOLFE RD 7865 04142005 05122005
05030130 E DOWNEY SAVINGS LOANAS10381 DE ANZA BLVD 820 12162008
05010120 C UNITED NATIONAL BANK 10001 N DE ANZA BLVD 101 420 01202005 03232005
05090209 C HEWLETTPACKARD 10955 TANTAU AVE BLD 45 1635 09302005 12132005
06040100 C EVERSHINE GROUP 19754STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1087 12222006 07262007
Page 10
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
cn
cn
07070259
06010056
05070091
05040014
05110050
05110041
05120022
05110065
05110069
06020105
05070067
10127
10152
10157
0
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
TIANLHUI TEMPLE 7811 ORION LN
MATTESON COMPANIES 20813 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
HEWLETT PACKARD 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE 46
AARON BROTHERS 20600 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
BYER MARIAN AND ALLAN G 20670 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
NEW LIFE CHURCH OF NAZARE 20900 MC CLELLAN RD
MATTRSON CO 19925 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DOLLINGER DE ANZA ASSOCIA 1601 DE ANZA BLVD 118
CUPERTINO FINANCE 270 19638 STEVENS CRK 270
tnlI INCFRfF AN7A ASSCIA1R11 S f1F AN7A RI Vfl 4R
KUMUD GROCERIES 10255 S DEANZA BLVD
JAYNE HAM 23000 HOMESTEAD RD
VERITAS PROPERTY MGMT 10596 N TANTAU AVE
PACIFIC RESOURCES 10501 N TANTAU AVE
PROMETHEUS 100 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
MARK THOMAS 8 CO INC 20833 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
PROMETHEUS 150 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DURECT CORPORATIVN 10260 BUBB RD
NUIMAGE FURNITURE 20149 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT 19450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
LORIS DINER RESTAURANT 19930 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
FARMERS INSURANCE 20735 STEVENS CREEK BLVD D
DONNA COTNER DDS 10011 N FOOTHILL BLV 112
PROMETHEUS 6TH FL 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DR ALAVI 10251 TORRE AVE 160
COMMLTI 445 05102005 10102006
1817 09062007 02152008
4787 05102005 09192005
4854 04222005 05232005
1874 0117200603202006
390 07152005 08042005
4100 05042005 05232005
1451 11092005 11182005
625 11082005 01242006
ri d11 171f1f1S
2525 01122006 05302006
4782 01032006 04252006
14250 04032006
890 09012005 03162006
1000 09062005
480 09152005 02092006
3000 0906200511072005
1000 09212007 03032008
9500 03082005 04282005
2705 01262005 04262005
6052 03162005 06282005
42 06032005 08092005
1402 02022005 05272005
3800 03152005
65 02032005 03212005
Page 11
Date10142010
TIs less than25000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue CloseNumber Type Footage Date Date
N
IG1
rn
05020080 C DR WARREN L LEE 10251 TORRE AVE 108 COMMLTI 1400 03142005
07040087 C THE FORUM RANCHO SAN ANT 23500 CRISTO REY DR OFFICE 496 06212007 10082007
05040043 C BERG 8 BERG 10460 BUBB RD 1780 04072005 05102005
05060014 C DR HENRY LIN 19028 STEVENS CREEK BLVD D 953 08102005 09222005
05040055 C BERG BERG 10460 BUBB RD 100 04192005 04292005
05040080 C AMES AVENUE ASSOCIATES 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE 100 13664 04142005 06212005
05040081 C BETTER HOME AND LOAN 10495 S DEANZA BLVD 2924 04142005
05040100 C PROMETHEUS 6TH FL 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3800 05102005 06102005
05050056 C AARON BROS 20600 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 275 05122005 05232005
05060076 E JC PENNEY COMPANY 10151N WIFF Rn Fn nstQnnn
05080048 E SYMANTEC GROUND FL 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3500 08262005
05080070 C IMAGINATION UNLIMITED 19110 STEVENS CREEK BLVD C 1000 09062005 10252005
05090144 C WAHOOSFISH TACO 19626 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2735 12052005 04062006
05080066 C PROMETHEUS 850 8TH FL 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 145 08092005 08312005
05110008 C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19638 STEVENS CRK220 1434 11012005
06120168 E KCR DEVELOPMENT 19628 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1500 03062007 05312007
06060109 C JIM BOWLBY SHU MEI CH 19705 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 300 0613200608022006
05090126 C DOLLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD 111 4905 1017l200512062005
05090054 E DOLLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD 1838 10192005
05090071 C AMES AVE ASSOCIATION 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE 200 1298 09162005 11172005
05090108 C DOLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 DE ANZA BLVD 230 1475 09152005 09282005
06020090 C STARBUCKS COFFEE 22390 HOMESTEAD RD 1700 06202006 08022006
07070171 C SYMANTEC CORPORATION 10200 S DE ANZA BLVD 1161 07312007 09122007
07010181 C HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANti 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE 46L 18270 03092007 07252007
05080112 C SYMANTEC 1ST FL 20300 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1169 08222005 12132005
Page 12
67
05
69
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
I
05080214
05100210
05110115
05030266
05030299
05120084
05120111
06060170
60141
20116
20141
y
C
E
C
E
E
E
C
C
C
C
E
E
C
E
C
C
E
C
C
STATE SIDE PROPERTY 100 19400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
STATESIDE PROPERTIES 19400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CALI FINANCIAL 10495 S DE ANZA BLVD
PETSMART 20558 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
TREND MICRO 2ND FL 10101 N DE ANZA BLVD
SYMANTEC GROUND FL 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
VARDY MIKE LLC 10215 S DEANZA BLVD
DOLLINGER DEANZAASSOICA 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD 250
MATTESON CO 19925 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ARC SIGHT 5 RESULTS WAY
VALLCO INTERNATIONAL 10123 N WOLFE RD
OLIVIA JANG 19062 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
PROMETHEUS REAL ESTATE 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3
SAEEDGHAZVINI
STARBUCKS
CEC ENTERTAINMENT
CHRIS CIARDELLA
PROMETHEUS REG
CHRIS MARCHESE
10075 PASADENA AVE
20520 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
19805 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
21721 GRANADA AVE
20400 STEVENS CRK 850
10101 BUBB RD
090163 C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DEANZA BLVD 1ST FLR
100080 C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DEANZA BLVD
090110 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT 1ST FLR
020072 C APPLE INC 10400 RiDGE VIEW CT
COMMLTI 3789 06162005
3712 03162005
2850 03232005 06222005
20596 07202005
204 08172005
10000 09302005
1600 0207l2006
525 12062005 12202005
530 03292005 04112005
n nininnnRin
1140 04032006
6078 03102006 02202010
1500 0628200610152007
224 01052007
1107 08172006 09012006
14652 05312006 11022006
1100 05092006
9048 0724J2006
15620 08042006 01082007
7000 01032008 01182008
7000 10092007 11092007
620 09182007 04292008
904 03082007 05102007
Page 13
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07030108
06030126
06050126
AGS98A9
05050146
06080195
05120050
N nFnnn
I06010024o
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
F
E
MANDAR DANGE
ORBIT RESOURCES INC
ORBIT RESOURCES
APPLE INC
HEWLETTPACKARD COMP
HK ENVISTMENTS
CEC ENTERTAINMENT
MARCHANT FAMI LY
FVFRHINFI PV
HEWLETf PACKARD TRAINI
10564 DEANZA BLVD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10123 N WOLFE RD
20730VALLEY GREEN DR
19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
20735 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
19805 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10300 S DEANZA BLVD
1QRRSTFVFNSfRKRfl
10955 TANTAU AVE 45NL
COMMLTI 1135 03292005
1042 02082008
550 04202007
21680 05232006
2711 06232006
991
14652
3778
Rd
5117
32008
72007
112005108092005
1202006I070320071f1f1f1F
3162006 I
06020024 C PROMETHEUS 300 20450STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1500 0223200603292006
05020064 E APPLE INC ONE INFINITELOOP 1090 03222005
07090062 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT 2ND FLR 3343 09182007 04292008
07090063 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIVIEW CT 1ST FLR 2993 10162007 01082008
07050195 C APPLE INC 10400 RIDGE VIEWCT 905 06182007 12032007
05010087 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI DR 1067 01132005 03222005
05050057 C APPLE INC 10460 BANDLEY DR 1228 05f112005 08232005
05060221 C APPLE INC 10381 BANDLEY DR BLDG A 16438 08112005 09212005
05040116 E APPLE INC 20705VALLEYGREN DR 1500 04192005
05030231 E APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 8000 04082005
05030236 C APPLE INC 20605 LAZANEO DR 14920 04272005 06162005
05030203 C APPLE INC 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD 1148 03222005 02222006
05020141 C APPLE INC 20605LAZNEODR 4566 0405200507182005
Page 14
I
Date10142010
TIs less than 25000
Permit Status Owner Name LocationAddress Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
05030171 C APPLE INC 20650VALLEY GREEN DR COMMLTI 322 0316200507192005
05120085 C APPLE INC 10101 BUBB RD 1420 1215200503022006
05100012 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE 1869 10042005
05100040 C APPLE INC 10431 N DEANZA BLVD 3897 10212005
05090214 G APPLE INC 10131 BUBB RD 13540 1208200503302006
05090056 C APPLE INC 10400 RIDGE VIEW CT 16416 0929200504132006
05080255 G APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 14060 09082005 03172006
07030160 G APPLE INC 10381 BANDLEY DR 16520 04192007 09122007
652492
3I1 llvanc
2 35
Page 15