Optimization of the Concrete Mix Proportions Centered on Performance After Exposure to High Temperature
A. Chaboki-Khiabani1, a, M. Bastami 1, b M. Baghbadrani2, c and M. Kordi 2, d 1Assistant Professor, Engineering faculty, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2Engineering faculty, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Key words: High Strength Concrete, mix proportion, Taguchi approach, retained, elevated temperature.
Abstract. This paper presents the results of an experimental and statistical study on the effect of
high temperatures on the retained mechanical properties of high-strength concretes (HSC). The
mechanical properties of HSC significantly change during and later than exposure to elevated
temperature. The compressive and splitting tensile strength of more than 400 HSC cylindrical
specimens with sixteen mix proportion have investigated to study the effect of mix proportion on
the retained mechanical properties of HSC specimens after heating. According to these results, a
considerable loss was observed for all mixes and specimens in strength particularly in tensile
splitting strength. In addition, these experimental data were investigated using Taguchi approach to
find the effective parameters of mix proportion. Also, the most optimum mix proportion was found
and checked experimentally. According to our results, by controlling some factors in the mix
proportion, it is possible to reduce the retained destructive effects of elevated temperature on HSC
specimens.
Introduction
Some studies have found that the chemical composition and physical structure of high strength
concrete (HSC) significantly change during and after exposure to high temperature [1]. this
exposure leads to transformations and reactions that cause the progressive breakdown of cement gel
structure and aggregates and consequent loss in its mechanical properties such as load bearing
capacity[2, 3]. High temperatures also cause chemical and micro-structural changes, such as water
migration (diffusion, drying), increased dehydration, interfacial thermal incompatibility, and
chemical decomposition of hardened cement paste and aggregates[2]. These changes decrease the
strength and stiffness of HSC members permanently and increase the deformation of HSC
members[4, 5]. The behavior of high strength concrete under and after fire exposure is determined
by the numerous factors such as the aggregates, the cement matrix, its moisture, content, pore
structure and loading, in addition to the rate of heating and maximum temperature attained[6].
Among these factors, the mix proportion of HSC is one of the key factors that could efficiently
control its permeability, bearing capacity, moisture content, density, aggregate interlock, pore
structures and even durability[7, 8, 9].
Finding the optimum mix proportion of HSC using Taguchi optimization method
Due to the wide variability of material contents of HSC, in general, a large number of experiments
are usually required to find a suitable mixture for attaining the targeted requirements. Therefore;
utilizing a reliable optimization method is necessary. Thus, the fractional factorial experiments
using an orthogonal array were investigated by Taguchi, which can substantially decrease the
number of experiments required to study the effects of factors and their interactions[10, 11]. Four
control factors, including water to binder material, the ratio of fine aggregate to total aggregate
silica fume percentage and the supper plasticizer were selected for this study. Each of these factors
was treated at four levels, as shown in Table 1.
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 268-270 (2011) pp 372-376Online available since 2011/Jul/04 at www.scientific.net© (2011) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerlanddoi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.268-270.372
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of TTP,www.ttp.net. (ID: 194.225.17.204-20/09/11,12:11:40)
Table 1 Optimization parameters and their variation levels
Level Variables
Levels
1 2 3 4
A Water to Binder Material 0.21-0.23 0.23-0.25 0.25-0.27 0.27-0.29
B Fine aggregate to total aggregate 0.32-0.36 0.36-0.40 0.4-0.44 0.44-0.48
C Silica Fume to cement % 2-6 6-10 10-14 14-18
C Supper Plasticizer (kg/m3) 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20
Preparation and heating of the specimens
The experimental program included making more than 400 cylindrical HSC specimens with sixteen
different mix proportions and then applying the standard ISO 834 elevated temperature to them.
The details of each HSC mix proportion used and the average retained strength data for each mix
proportion are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 The components of each Mix proportion and the their average retained strength
Mix Name
water (kg/m3)
cement (kg/m3)
Cilicia fume
(kg/m3)
Large aggregate
(kg/m3)
Small aggregate
(kg/m3)
Super plasticizer
(kg/m3)
Ave. comp.
strength (MPa)
Ave. tensile.
strength (MPa)
Retained comp.
strength (Mpa)
Retained comp.
strength %
Retained tensile
strength (MPa)
Retained tensile
strength%
Mix1 151 520 64 1153 600 11 77 5.9 21 27 1.3 22
Mix2 130 513 43 1080 685 16 86 6.4 16 19 1.3 21
Mix3 144 564 89 1068 593 20 82 6.0 15 18 1.5 25
Mix4 125 545 52 1103 589 18 78 6.0 21 27 1.3 22
Mix5 135 500 30 1110 700 14 90 6.4 19 21 1.2 19
Mix6 151 519 62 1122 579 9 94 6.6 16 17 1.5 22
Mix7 165 535 80 1153 597 5 81 5.7 14 17 1.3 23
Mix8 150 500 25 1004 822 9 78 5.8 20 26 1.2 20
Mix9 150 500 75 1016 760 3 82 6.0 25 30 1.4 24
Mix10 150 500 25 1233 617 8 81 5.9 21 26 1.1 19
Mix11 150 475 24 1066 710 3 76 5.7 17 22 1.1 19
Mix12 156 487 47 1068 676 11 66 5.5 14 21 1.2 21
Mix13 150 500 25 1233 617 8 81 6.4 22 27 1.3 20
Mix14 150 475 24 1066 710 3 76 6.1 21 28 1.2 19
Mix15 156 487 47 1068 676 11 64 5.4 17 27 1.1 21
Mix16 150 500 0 1234 617 8 72 5.9 17 24 1.1 18
Analysis the results with Taguchi approach
The best possible levels of mix proportions of HSC were investigated for the maximization of
compressive strength and splitting tensile strength values using the Taguchi technique. The
compressive retained strength and splitting tensile strength are a ‘larger the better’ type of quality
characteristic since the goal is to maximize these strengths. The standard S/N ratio computing
formula for this type of response is:
]11
[log101
210 ∑=
−=
n
j iji YnN
S
(1)
Where ‘i’ is the number of a trial; ‘Yij’ is the measured value of quality characteristic for the ith
trial and jth experiment; ‘n’ is the number of repetitions for the experimental combination. A
statistical analysis is performed to determine the statistically significant factors and the data analysis
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 268-270 373
is presented in Tables 3 and 4. In these tables, the degree of contribution of each significant factor is
obtained so as to determine the level of its statistical importance in the model.
Table 3 Response Table for Signal to Noise Ratios for compressive strength (Larger is better)
Supper
Plasticizer
Silica
fume %
Fine aggregate to total
aggregate
Water to
binder Level
27.16 26.92 28.31 26.98 1
27.34 26.77 26.86 25.99 2
26.86 27.97 26.3 27.78 3
27.85 27.54 27.74 28.45 4
0.99 1.2 2.01 2.46 Delta
4 3 2 1 Rank
Table 4 Response Table for Signal to Noise Ratios for tensile splitting strength (Larger is better)
Supper
Plasticizer
Silica
fume %
Fine aggregate to total
aggregate
Water to
binder Level
26.53 26.09 26.51 27.03 1
26.02 26.23 26.11 26.42 2
26.05 26.79 26.8 26.3 3
26.94 26.42 26.1 25.79 4
0.92 0.7 0.7 1.24 Delta
2 4 3 1 Rank
Since all parameters had interaction between them, the best possible testing conditions of the HSC
properties can be determined from the main effect plot graphs which is shown in Figure 1 and 2.
Figure 1 Main effect plot for retained compressive strength
374 Computational Materials Science
Figure 2 Main effect plot for retained splitting tensile strength
According to these figures, the water to binder ratio has the most effective effect on the retained
compressive strength of specimens. Moreover, the impact of fine aggregate ratio is also significant.
However the effect of Silica fume and super plasticizer is not that significant.
In addition, the water to binder ratio has the most effective effect on the retained tensile strength of
specimens. Furthermore, the impact of super plasticizer is also significant. However the effect of
Silica fume and fine aggregate ratio is not that significant. Using Taguchi approach, the best mix
proportion for the retained stresses is tabulated in Table 5.
Table 5 The optimum factor’s value according to the Taguchi approach
SP (kg/m3) Silica
fume%
Fine agg.
to all agg. W/b Optimization goal
20 12% 0.34 0.28 The retained comp. strength
20 12% 0.42 0.22 The retained tensile strength
Therefore, just only one mix proportion is not most advantageous proportion for both retained
purposes: compressive and tensile strength of HSC specimens. In order to verify the optimum mix-
design proportion obtained using the Taguchi method, laboratory experiments were carried out to
determine whether the retained compressive strength and tensile splitting strength can be maximize
by the proposed optimum mixture proportions. To obtain meaningful results, the same materials and
the same conditions were used as in the Taguchi analysis. The results are shown in Table 6 and
table 7.
Table 6 The optimum mix proportion verification on retained compressive strength
HSC mix
Water
(kg/m3)
Cement
(kg/m3)
Cilicia
fume (kg/m3)
Gravel
(kg/m3)
Sand
(kg/m3)
Super
plasticizer (kg/m3)
Ave. comp.
strength
(Mpa)
Average retained
strength
(Mpa)
Retained strength
reduction
%
Taguchi
Method prediction
Mix17 157 500 60 1140 590 20 81 24 30 31
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 268-270 375
Table 7 The optimum mix proportion verification on retained tensile strength
HSC
mix
Water
(kg/m3)
Cement
(kg/m3)
Cilicia
fume (kg/m3)
Gravel
(kg/m3)
Sand
(kg/m3)
Super
plasticizer (kg/m3)
Ave. tensile
strength
(Mpa)
Average retained
strength(
Mpa)
Retained strength
reduction
%
Taguchi
Method prediction
Mix18 124 500 60 1004 726 20 6.2 1.6 26 26
The verification study results showed that the proposed optimum mix proportions concurred well
with result obtained by Taguchi’s approach in both compression and tension.
Conclusion
On the basis of the experiments carried out on the various specimens and the Taguchi optimization
approach, the following conclusions could be made.
• There is no direct relationship between the compressive strength reduction and tensile
splitting strength in different mix proportion. Even thought, both decrease considerably,
their reduction percentage is not associated.
• The verification study results showed that the proposed optimum mix proportions concurred
well with result obtained by Taguchi’s approach. However, this mix proportion optimization
increased the retained compressive and tensile strength of HSC up to 10 percent which is not
very significant when compared to the strength reduction percentage.
• Using these data, we have checked the data with Taguchi approach and it is found that the
water to binder ratio is the most important factor in mix proportion in both compressive and
tensile strength.
References
[1] Purkiss, J.A., Design of structures, Fire safety engineering. Second ed. 2007: Elsevier.
[2] Georgali, B. and P.E. Tsakiridis, Microstructure of fire-damaged concrete. Cement and
Concrete Composites, 2005. 27: p. 255–259.
[3] Peng, G. and Z.S. Huang, Change in microstructure of hardened cement paste subjected to
elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 2008. 22: p. 593-599.
[4] Kodur, V.K.R. and L. Phan, Critical factors governing the fire performance of high strength
concrete systems. Fire Safety Journal, 2007. 42(2007): p. 482-488.
[5] Ghandehari, M., A. Behnood, and M. Khanzadi, Residual Mechanical Properties of High-
Strength Concretes after Exposure to Elevated Temperatures. Journal of materails in civil
engineering 2010. 22(1): p. 6.
[6] Nassif, A.Y., Postfiring Stress-strain Hysteresis of Concrete Subjected to Various Heating and
Cooling Regimes. FIRE AND MATERIALS, 2002(26): p. 103-109.
[7] M. F. Alves, R.A. Cremonini, and D.C.C.D. Molin, A comparison of mix proportioning
methods for high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004. 26(6): p. 8.
[8] Sammy Y. N. Chan, G.-f. Peng, and J.K.W. Chan, Comparison between high strength concrete
and normal strength concrete subjected to high temperature Materials and Structures, 2010.
29(10): p. 4.
[9] Ravindrarajah, R.S., R. Lopez, and H. Reslan, Effect of Elevated Temperature on the Properties
of High-Strength Concrete containing Cement Supplementary Materials, in 9th International
Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. 2007: Brisbane, Australia.
[10] Roy, R., A Primer on the Taguchi Method. 1990: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
[11] Taguchi, G., System of Experimental Design. Vol. 1. 1987: KRAUS International Publication.
376 Computational Materials Science
Computational Materials Science doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.268-270 Optimization of the Concrete Mix Proportions Centered on Performance afterExposure to High Temperature doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.268-270.372
Top Related