1
Micro-Architecture of the Zapotec:
Physical Manifestations of a Metaphysical Concept
By Jessica Kindrick
Abstract:
The so-called “precursor” of Monte Albán, San José Mogote is one of the oldest sites in the Oaxaca Valley
and was the location of many innovations in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. On Mound 1 a series of three, two-room
temple structures (known as Structures 36, 35, and 13) dating to Monte Alban Period II were built superimposed
over one another. A complex ritual scene of arranged ceramic figures (known as Feature 96) was placed in an
offering box and buried beneath the floor of the oldest of these temple structures.
These temples provide scholars with invaluable information regarding the sanctification and ceremonial
rituals performed within them at San José Mogote and other Zapotec sites. In this paper I contend that this “micro-
tomb” can be interpreted as a literal, physical representation of a metaphysical concept: the recognized separation
that was responsible for the two-room temple plan that would become standardized later at Monte Albán and other
sites under its control.
Introduction
During the Formative Period, the Valley of Oaxaca underwent an extreme upswing in
population, as well as the stratification of that population within a relatively short time span of
around one thousand years (Figure 1). The Rosario Phase – Monte Albán I transition was,
according to Blanton et al, “one of the most important episodes in the evolution” of the cultures
that thrived in the Valley of Oaxaca (Figure 2).1 The so-called “precursor” of Monte Albán, San
1 Richard E Blanton, et al., Monte Albán’s Hinterland, Part I: The Prehispanic Settlement Patterns of the Central
and Southern Parts of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Museum of
Anthropology, 1982): 37.
2
José Mogote is one of the oldest sites in the Oaxaca Valley and was the location of many
innovations in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica (Figure 3). On Mound 1, a series of three, two-room
temple structures (known as Structures 36, 35, and 13) were built superimposed over one another
(Figure 4). The temple sequence spans almost the entirety of Monte Albán period II with
possible overlap into early Monte Albán III. An offering of a complex ritual scene (known as
Feature 96) buried beneath the floor of the oldest of these temple structures, along with four
other offering boxes, warrants a deeper investigation and particular attention (Figure 5).
First uncovered in 1974, these well preserved, superimposed temples provide scholars
with invaluable information regarding the sanctification and ceremonial rituals performed within
them at San José Mogote and other Zapotec sites. All three temples were constructed of adobe
brick with white-stuccoed walls and floors and were oriented facing west. This ritual scene of
figures and objects is arranged in and around a miniature tomb structure and includes five
ceramic effigy urns, a ceramic figure who kneels in a ceramic bowl, the complete skeleton of a
Bobwhite quail, and a pair of trimmed deer antlers. I would contend that, to better understand
how the Zapotec related to both their deceased ancestors and the supernatural forces they
revered, this “micro-tomb” can be interpreted as a literal, physical representation of a
metaphysical concept: the recognized separation (both between this world and the upper world
and between those specialists who communicated with the ancestors and the community at large
who relied on their services) that was responsible for the two-room temple plan that would later
become standardized at Monte Albán and other sites under its control.2
This assertion isn’t necessarily a groundbreaking one; however, the current state of the
literature fails to tease out much more than a surface level interpretation of this scene where it is
2 Elsa M. Redmond and Charles S. Spencer, “Rituals of Sanctification and the Development of Standardized
Temples in Oaxaca, Mexico,” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18, no. 02 (June 2008): 257-258.
3
mentioned or addressed. Marcus and Flannery discuss it in numerous sources, both
collaboratively and on their own, as well as Redmond and Spencer. Adam Sellen has also
discussed the ceramic vessels known as Cocijo urns. By interpreting and analyzing various lines
of evidence through a cosmological framework, we can come to better understand the ways in
which the Zapotec related to their ancestors and revered supernaturals, how different
communities related to one another, and how we can possibly better interpret Zapotec ritual and
its functions in larger society.
Zapotec “Micro-Architecture”
The tomb structure of the ritual scene of Feature 96 could be considered an example of
Zapotec “micro-architecture”. In a 1976 article, Bucher discusses “micro-architecture” within the
context of the Gothic style of the Medieval period, and claims that small scale architectural
structures, like reliquaries, were more relatable and more imperative to the general population
and their salvation than their grand, monumental-sized counterparts.3 Bucher makes sure to note
the often undervalued importance of the group experience to believers when linked to objects
imbued with mythical importance.4 There is also an analogy between his description of the
eventual role of the church as a “service structure” meant to house the smaller micro versions
and the Zapotec temple where the offering box containing Feature 96 was found.
Suggesting that these small, sacred objects can be analyzed in much the same way as
their macro brethren, Bucher emphasizes the blurring of lines that occurred between the creation
of the macro and micro; after all, the small scale model is often created with, at least, the same
artistry to be used in the larger final version. Beginning in the late thirteenth century, the same
3 François Bucher, “Micro-Architecture as the ‘Idea’ of Gothic Theory and Style.” Gesta 15, no. 1/2 (January 1,
1976): 71–89. 4 Bucher, 71.
4
design ideals were applied to the creation of both, until the design utilized in the smaller format
became so complex as to warrant its own genre entirely. And while the Zapotec example of a
“micro-tomb” was never intended to be seen by more than a few select individuals before burial,
the motivations for its creation and placement are comparable to the some of the motivations
discussed by Bucher. The way that the Zapotec would have related to the imagery represented
by, and in, this scene would have been comparable to the audience of Bucher’s objects. And in
the same way that Bucher observes that the “greatest mysteries of Christianity” were enclosed in
these Gothic micro-structures, the mysteries of the ancient Zapotec are embodied by this scene.
It is interesting to note that this example of a Zapotec micro-tomb is actually dissimilar to
at least one of its contemporary macro counterparts (Figure 6). It is, however, similar to an older
macro example found at San José Mogote (Figure 7).5 I would argue that this could indicate that
the micro-tomb is meant to represent the tomb of a long deceased ancestor who was the
progenitor of, or a very important member of, the ruling elite’s “dynasty”. This ancestor is the
one depicted atop the micro-tomb, who, according to Marcus and Flannery, is in mid-
transformation into one of the revered “cloud ancestors”.
During Monte Albán II, tombs of nobility became more elaborate in their construction, as
evidenced by Tomb 118 at Monte Albán (Figure 6). Before this they were generally one room, or
slightly divided one room, structures, Tomb 10 and 11 at an elite Rosario period residence at San
José Mogote being good examples (Figure 8). The plan of Tomb 11 is similar to the plan of
Feature 96’s micro-tomb and therefore supports my hypothesis; and almost as if ushering in the
standardization of the two-room temple plan, Tomb 11 has a two-chambered plan. Both tombs
were found to have been raided, only a small fragment of an obsidian implement remained on the
5 Joyce Marcus, and Kent V Flannery. Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in Mexico’s Oaxaca
Valley. (New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson, 1996): 180-181.
5
floor of Tomb 11 and a few bone, projectile point, and obsidian fragments were left behind in a
pile of red ochre powder in Tomb 10.
Even more similarities are observable between this example of Zapotec micro-
architecture and a full size Olmec example from the site of La Venta that was also associated
with ancestor worship by way of red pigment and contemporary to Tomb 10 and 11 at San José
Mogote (Figure 9). The plans are similar; the materials are understandably different given
regional availability of supply and construction styles. The Olmec example from La Venta is
full-sized, but it is miniature in the sense that it is a smaller tomb in which infants were interred.
There is also a corollary in the orientation of the site of LaVenta at eight degrees west of north
and the orientation of one of the earliest ceremonial buildings in San José Mogote, sometimes
referred to as a “Men’s House”. Another thing the two structures have in common is the link to
implements of autosacrificial activities: stingray spines of obsidian at San José Mogote and ones
made of jade at La Venta were found in the associated archaeological contexts. 6 Marcus and
Flannery have acknowledged the links between these tomb structures before, Marcus addressing
this comparison specifically.7
A Pervading Dichotomy
In this paper, I argue that this dichotomy of upper/lower and inner/outer is observable in
the ritual scene of Feature 96, which was buried under the floor of Structure 36, a two-room
temple dating to Monte Albán period at San José Mogote in the Etla arm of the Oaxaca Valley.
Recently radio carbon dated to 60 BCE – 90 CE, Structure 36 was the first two-room temple in a
6 Marcus and Flannery. Zapotec Civilization, 138.
7 Christina T Halperin, et al, Mesoamerican Figurines: Small-Scale Indices of Large-Scale Social Phenomena
(Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2009): 28-29.
6
series of three that were superimposed upon one another.8 Before the next two-room temple
(Structure 35) was built over the razed remains of Structure 36, sometime between 10 BCE – 140
CE, a total of five offering boxes were deposited underneath the floor of Structure 36.9 In about
another hundred years, Structure 35 was covered and a final temple (Structure 13) was built over
it approximately 100-200 CE.
In their 2004 article, Marcus and Flannery propose the idea that the ritual razing and
rebuilding of these two-room temples at San José Mogote coincides with a 52-year calendar
cycle. The later Aztec culture are also known for their use of a 52-year cycle, believing that the
world would end “unless all old fires were extinguished and new fires lit, both in the main
temple and on surrounding mountaintops” at the end of every cycle.10
While Marcus and
Flannery make sure to note that we have no knowledge of what rites were conducted upon
cycle’s end, they are also quick to emphasize the Zapotec tendency of building new temples over
the remains of leveled ones. They claim that this particular temple sequence provides an
opportunity to test this hypothesis, even though upon completing their analysis this can be
neither confirmed nor excluded as a possibility.11
Redmond and Spencer also discuss this
possibility in their 2008 article for Cambridge Archaeological Journal.12
The offering box containing Feature 96 was deposited underneath the floor of Structure
35 along with four other boxes before it was covered with a layer of soft adobe debris. This layer
of debris preserved the temple as well as a large number of obsidian implements found scattered
on southern end of the floor (Figure 10). These implements included daggers and prismatic
8 Joyce Marcus and Kent V. Flannery, “The Coevolution of Ritual and Society: New 14 C Dates from Ancient
Mexico,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, no. 52 (December
28, 2004): 18259. 9 Marcus and Flannery, “The Coevolution of Ritual and Society”, 18259.
10 Marcus and Flannery, “The Coevolution of Ritual and Society”, 18260.
11 Marcus and Flannery, “The Coevolution of Ritual and Society”, 18261.
12 Elsa M. Redmond, and Charles S. Spencer. “Rituals of Sanctification and the Development of Standardized
Temples in Oaxaca, Mexico.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18, no. 02 (June 2008): 239–266.
7
blades known to be used for bloodletting rituals and sacrificing small animals such as birds. In
fact, bird remains were also found during excavation in various places throughout the three
structures. Access to the inner room was generally restricted to the religious specialists who
would take the offerings left by petitioners in the outer room to complete the offering or
sacrifice, presumably, before a figure of a revered supernatural.
Two-Room Temple Plan
Flannery and Marcus argue that the standardization of a two-room temple plan indicates
the implementation of a “state religion” facilitated by “specialized priests” that would endure
throughout the Classic and Historic periods.13
The addition of a second room to the Zapotec
temple plan was observably in place by Monte Albán II, and one of the best known (but not
earliest) examples was uncovered by Caso on Building X, located northeast of Monte Albán’s
Main Plaza (Figure 11).14
Acosta uncovered another earlier temple underneath Caso’s discovery;
there was also an offering box deposited beneath the floor of this temple (presumably before the
later one was built over it as observed at San José Mogote).
Because Monte Albán underwent many construction phases, its oldest structures have
still not been uncovered; however, an early example of the two-room temple type was discovered
at Cerro Tilcajete in the Valle Grande arm of the Oaxaca Valley (Figure 12).15
By Monte Albán
II, the Ocotlán-Zimatlán polity that controlled the area of San Martin Tilcajete had finally been
conquered by the controlling elite at Monte Albán and Cerro Tilcajete was serving as a
13
K.V. Flannery & J. Marcus, “The origins of the state in Oaxaca: editors’ introduction”, in The Cloud People:
Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations, eds. K.V. Flannery & J. Marcus (New York, NY:
Academic Press, 1983): 82; and J Marcus, & K.V. Flannery, Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in
Mexico’s Oaxaca Valley (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996): 182, 222. 14
Marcus and Flannery, Zapotec Civilization, 182. 15
Christina M. Elson,
Oaxaca. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 2007): 47-48.
8
secondary center to the state, much like San José Mogote at this point in time. Unlike San José
Mogote however, Cerro Tilcajete was a completely new site.16
The ruling elite at Monte Albán
had ties to the group of people sometimes referred to as the “Jaguar clan” from the Olmec
heartland. Blanton has suggested that Monte Albán was founded without regard to “practical
economic matters or subsistence”;17
therefore, secondary centers like San José Mogote and Cerro
Tilcajete, mentioned earlier, all more important to Monte Albán’s empire (Figure 13).
Physical Manifestations of the Metaphysical
Marcus and Flannery have interpreted the complex scene of Feature 96 as representing a
deceased Zapotec “Lord” transforming into a “Cloud Person” or “Flying Figure” who now can
communicate with Lightning.18
Additionally, they assert that the scene could represent a royal
ancestor of the kneeling figure (the noble acompañante) within the miniature tomb, or the partial
metamorphosis of that same individual, caught at a stage where its body is still that of a human
but the face is that of the lighting god Cociyo's. A cape flows behind the figure, who sits up on
its elbows holding a wooden stick and a bifurcated object that Marcus and Flannery identify as a
serpent tongue, they link these implements to the proliferation of agriculture. As already
mentioned, the agricultural capabilities of San José Mogote would have been very important to
the elite at Monte Albán who depended on the foodstuffs grown there.
Sellen has studied these Cocijo urns as well, voicing support for the links drawn between
Cocijo as a revered supernatural and the ancient Mesoamerican rain-god Tlaloc by Caso and
16
Christina M Elson, Excavations at Cerro
Oaxaca. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 2007): xi. 17
Richard E. Blanton, “The Founding of Monte Albán,” in The Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec
and Mixtec Civilizations (Academic Press, 1983), 84. 18
Marcus and Flannery. Zapotec Civilization, 70-71.
9
Bernal despite Marcus’s objections, citing Marcus’ own ethnographic work as evidence.19
Marcus’ objections to this comparison seem strange given that Marcus and Flannery have
compared Monte Albán’s “synoikism” to that of Ancient Greece, yet she is opposed to referring
to these entities as deities, claiming that it is not appropriate to view a corpus of Mesoamerican
super naturals as a “pantheon”.20
Marcus and Flannery have interpreted the four Cocijo urns
found nearby the micro-tomb as the “four companions” of Cocijo: rain, wind, clouds, and hail.
The inclusion of these four accompanying super-natural forces has precedence in Oaxaca as
observable in a Zapotec effigy vessel of Cocijo with four containers attached behind the effigy
figure, and is largely what Marcus and Flannery based their interpretation on I’m sure (Figure
14).21
Every aspect of the ritual scene known as Feature 96 was predetermined and carefully
arranged. The motivation behind the deposition of the five offering boxes found under the floor
of Structure 36 may never be known with any amount of certainty, but the possible
interpretations put forth by Zapotec scholars help us better understand the nature of the society
that lived at San José Mogote and how they interacted with Monte Albán. This site would
eventually be overshadowed by the rise of Monte Albán as a regional center by 500 BCE,
although many of the forms and styles seen at San José Mogote are also observable at this later
site. The importance of secondary centers like San José Mogote and Cerro Tilcajete is
emphasized by Blanton who, as mentioned earlier, has posited that Monte Albán was founded
without regard to trade access or agricultural possibilities. If this is true, then these secondary
19
Adam T. Sellen, “Storm-God Impersonators from Ancient Oaxaca,” Ancient Mesoamerica 13, no. 01 (January
2002): 6. 20
Joyce Marcus, “Zapotec Religion”, in The Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec
Civilizations, edited by Kent Flannery and Joyce Marcus. (Academic Press: New York, 1983): 346-349. 21
Joyce Marcus, and Kent V. Flannery. “Ancient Zapotec Ritual and Religion: An Application of the Direct
Historical Approach.”, 59.
10
centers would have been responsible for supplying the elite at Monte Albán with necessary and
prestige-indicating goods and food.
If the temples included in the superimposed sequence were in fact ritually razed at the
end of cycle, then it could indicate a ritual rededication to stay in the favor of the super naturals
that they revered. These super-naturals, and the ancestors who would placate them on behalf of
their still living family members, were responsible for bringing fertility to crops and people; if
San José Mogote and Cerro Tilcajete were secondary centers to Monté Albán and supplied this
capital with food and other items then making sure that these sites were in good standing with
these super-naturals would have been of primary importance to the ruling elite.
This connection is emphasized by the similarities observable between the capital and
these secondary centers, but especially between Monte Albán and San José Mogote where the
two-room temple plan prevails and danzante figures appear. The symbolic red color is generally
associated with elite ancestor ritual and it can be seen at San José Mogote, Monte Albán, and
even the Olmec sites of San Lorenzo and La Venta and throughout Mesoamerica. Spatial
distinction of ritually accessible space is illustrated in the two-room temple plan as well as the
example of micro-architecture from San José Mogote known as Feature 96. The less sacred outer
temple is the equivalent of the interior of the micro-tomb where the ancestor figure, also
identified as an acompañante figure, who is covered in red pigment kneels in a bowl beside the
remains of a bobwhite quail offering. Inside this micro-tomb is literally where the ancestors’
representative was placed and buried to be housed forever.
Outside and atop the micro-tomb represents the upper realm of existence, where the
turtle-like ancestors reside among the clouds. The ascension of a human into this upper realm
may have required a human turtle ancestor transformation, which is depicted by the “flying”
11
ancestor figure shown either wearing a Cocijo mask or as having Cocijo’s face. And while
Klausmeyer’s drawing is better than having no representation of these artifacts at all, it leaves a
lot to be desired. In a 2011 photograph, Lorena Cassady captured an image of the rear of the
“flying” or “transforming” figure of Feature 96 and uploaded it to her Flickr account (Figure
15).22
Something that was noticeable in the drawing and emphasized in Cassady’s photo is the
tortoise-like feet of the figure; in the same vein, the figure’s posing mimics a turtle’s natural
stance as well. This turtle/tortoise link seems to be present in many native cultures of North
America, and it is usually a very primordial, highly revered creature in the realm of super-
naturals, and in the Zapotec case, they are associated with the ancestors. Another turtle/tortoise
link is present in the trimmed antler drumsticks, which could have been used to beat a turtle
drum.23
The Offering Boxes of Structure 35
The slab walls of the micro-tomb represent the physical and spiritual barrier between the
living and the realm of the supernatural as perceived by the Zapotec. Full time spiritual
specialists would have been present in the two-room temples to receive offerings that people
would bring and leave in the outer room, never crossing into the more sacred inner room where
only the specialist was allowed. The divide between the inner and outer rooms of the two-room
temple plan also represents the barrier represented by the slab walls of the micro-tomb. Under
the floor of the inner room is where the most impressive offerings (Features 94, 95, and 96) were
left. My thesis is also illustrated by the placement of these offering boxes left beneath the floor of
Structure 35.
22
This and more beautiful photos can be seen at http://www.flickr.com/photos/yaxchibonam/ 23
Joyce Marcus, “Rethinking Figurines” in Mesoamerican Figurines: Small-Scale Indices of Large-Scale Social
Phenomena. eds. Christina T Halperin, (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2009): 34.
12
Features 94 and 95 were deposited in stone offering boxes under the north end of the
floor of the inner room; 95 contained no remaining artifacts while 94 consisted of two human
effigies of jade and other small fragments lying in red pigmented powder.24
The two figures have
been interpreted by Marcus and Flannery as a possibly being “stand-ins” for sacrificed nobles.25
Feature 96 was deposited in an adobe offering box as opposed to stone and contained the
complex ritual scene arranged around the adobe walled, volcanic tuff topped, micro-tomb that
this paper has been considering. It is worth noting, once again, that the figure inside the micro-
tomb is covered in red powder.
This recurring red pigment indicates an intricate link between these offerings and the
revered cloud ancestors. The appearance of the symbolic red color in the offering boxes beneath
the floor of the more sacred inner room is not a coincidence as I would argue, but merely another
example of this metaphysical concept being manifested physically through architectural
structures. This hypothesis is further reinforced by the fact that Feature 93, left in an offering box
under the floor of the outer room, contained the remains of two quail bones because, as
mentioned elsewhere in this paper, the outer room of the two room temple is where petitioners
would leave offerings (including quail) for the religious specialist to take into the more sacred
inner room to offer to the super-naturals.26
Types of Mesoamerican Figurines
It is important to note the differences in form, function, and purpose of the types of
figurines found in the ritual scene of Feature 96. As Marcus observes, these deliberately arranged
24
Marcus and Flannery. “Ancient Zapotec Ritual and Religion”, 68. 25
Marcus and Flannery. “Ancient Zapotec Ritual and Religion”, 69. 26
Marcus and Flannery. “Ancient Zapotec Ritual and Religion”, 68.
13
scenes constitute primary contexts and can impart unadulterated knowledge to scholars.27
The
study of this scene, and other ritually arranged scenes like it, is relevant to at least four popular
research topics: ritual performance, social relations, gender, and ancestors. In addition to Feature
96 at San José Mogote, scenes similar to this one can be found at Monte Albán and
Xoxocotlan.28
The figurines of our ritual scene from Feature 96 are of two distinct types found in
Oaxaca. The five effigy vessels placed outside of the micro-tomb are known as Cocijo urns,
while the figure inside of the micro-tomb is a type known as acompañante figures, as designated
by Caso.29
My thesis is once again bolstered by the separation of the figure types inside and
outside the micro-tomb: the deified ancestor super-naturals being located outside and above the
tomb (representing the upper realm) and the soon-to-be deified kneeling ancestor (or
acompañante) figure on the inside of the micro-tomb representing life on the earthly realm.
Conclusion
The grandest physical incarnation of the metaphysical concept this paper has been
exploring could be said to be the founding of the elite capital of Monte Albán itself.30
With no
regard to trade access or agriculturally sound land, the ruling elite founded the new capital on a
series of low hills elevated 1,300 feet above the valley floor. This paper explored the physical
manifestations of a metaphysical concept recognized by the Zapotec that revolved around the
identified separation between the revered super-naturals and the living. Due to this separation,
communication with the super-naturals and/or deified ancestors who lived among them, had to
27
Marcus, “Rethinking Figurines”, 26. 28
Marcus, “Rethinking Figurines”, 31. 29
Caso 1938 and Caso and Bernal 1952, cited in Marcus, “Rethinking Figurines”, 33. 30
Kent V. Flannery, and Joyce Marcus. “Evolution of the Public Building in Formative Oaxaca.” In Cultural
Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of James Bennett Griffin. (New York: Academic Press, 1976): 220.
14
be facilitated by full-time religious specialists. The incorporation of these full-time specialists
prompted the addition of the second room to the Zapotec temple that would become standardized
later at Monte Albán and other sites under its control.
A few different lines of evidence were discussed to support my thesis. This evidence
included the association of red pigment with ancestor veneration as seen throughout formative
Mesoamerica, the physical arrangement of the ritual scene of Feature 96, the cosmological basis
for the two-room temple plan, Zapotec tomb architecture, as well as the location of the offering
boxes deposited under the floor of Structure 35 at San José Mogote. I hope that my analysis,
while not revelatory in any significant sense, can shed light on the cosmological principles the
Zapotec lived by, but that are so often quickly generalized and unspecific for the purposes of
quick and simplified interpretation.
17
Figure 3 (Above).
Artist Reconstruction of San
José Mogote.
Figure 4 (Right).
Three superimposed two-room
temples at San José Mogote.
18
Figure 5. Artist's reconstruction of the ritual scene from Feature 96, an offering box below the
floor of the Structure 35 temple.
19
Figure 6. Plan and cross-section of Tomb 118 at Monte Alban.
Figure 7. Tomb 11 at San José
Mogote, dates to the Rosario
Period.
21
Figure 9. Tomb
A, otherwise
known as
Monument 7, at
La Venta.
Figure 10. Plan of
Structure 35 temple, with
the locations of obsidian
artefacts on the floor
shown by symbols.
22
Figure 11. Plan of two-room
temple on Mound X at Monte
Albán.
Figure 12. Plan of Structure 2,
Mound B, a two-room temple at
Cerro Tilcajete.
23
Figure 13. An artist reconstruction of Monte Alban.
Figure 14. Zapotec effigy
vessel showing an
anthropomorphic Cociyo, or
Lightning, with 4 containers on
his back.
25
REFERENCES CITED
Beckmann, Jennifer, Charles S. Spencer, and Elsa M. Redmond. 2013. “Early State Development at
San Martín Tilcajete.” Accessed December 2.
http://research.amnh.org/anthropology/research/mca/projects/tilcajete.
Begun, Erica. 2008. “The Many Faces of Figurines.” Ancient Mesoamerica 19 (02) (September):
311–318.
Blanton, Richard E. 1996. Ancient Mesoamerica: A Comparison of Change in Three Regions.
Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1999. Ancient Oaxaca: The Monte Albán State. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Blanton, Richard E, University of Michigan, and Museum of Anthropology. 1982. Monte Alban’s
Hinterland, Part I: The Prehispanic Settlement Patterns of the Central and Southern Parts of the
Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology.
Blanton, Richard E. 1983. “The Founding of Monte Alban.” In The Cloud People: Divergent
Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations, 83–87. Academic Press.
Blanton, Richard E., Jill Appel, Laura Finsten, Steve Kowalewski, Gary Feinman, and Eva Fisch.
1979. “Regional Evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico.” Journal of Field Archaeology 6
(4): 369–390.
Blomster, Jeffrey P. 2002. “What and Where Is Olmec Style? Regional Perspectives on Hollow
Figurines in Early Formative Mesoamerica.” Ancient Mesoamerica 13 (02) (July): 171–195.
———. 2010. “Complexity, Interaction, and Epistemology: Mixtecs, Zapotecs, and Olmecs in Early
Formative Mesoamerica.” Ancient Mesoamerica 21 (01) (March): 135–149.
26
Boos, Frank. 1966. The Ceramic Sculptures of Ancient Oaxaca. South Brunswick [N.J.: A.S. Barnes.
Bucher, François. 1976. “Micro-Architecture as the ‘Idea’ of Gothic Theory and Style.” Gesta 15
(1/2) (January 1): 71–89. doi:10.2307/766753.
Cahn, Robert, and Marcus Winter. 1993. “The San José Mogote Danzante.” Indiana 13: 39–64.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Futures Studies 101: Implications Wheel.” 2011. Center for the
Future of Museums. http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2011/11/futures-studies-101-
implications-wheel.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Futurist Friday: Internet Fail.” 2012. Center for the Future of
Museums. http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2012/07/futurist-friday-internet-fail.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Museum Eras*—Creativaceous, CarbonNeutraliferous,
Developonian?” 2010. Center for the Future of Museums.
http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2010/10/museum-erascreativaceous.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Navigating Conservation Futures.” 2011. Center for the Future of
Museums. http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2011/12/navigating-conservation-futures.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Scanning for Change: Or How Important Work Can Sometimes
Look Like Wasting Time.” 2010. Center for the Future of Museums.
http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2010/09/scanning-for-change-or-how-important.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: Straight Up or with a Twist: Two Examples of How to Envision
the Future.” 2011. Center for the Future of Museums.
http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2011/01/straight-up-or-with-twist-two-examples.html.
“Center for the Future of Museums: The Sneaky Nature of Change.” 2010. Center for the Future of
Museums. http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/2010/09/sneaky-nature-of-change.html.
27
Coe, Michael D, Richard A Diehl, and Jay I. Kislak Reference Collection (Library of Congress).
1980. In the Land of the Olmec. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Diehl, Richard A. 2004. The Olmecs: America’s First Civilization. New York, N.Y.: Thames &
Hudson.
Elson, Christina M, University of Michigan, and Museum of Anthropology. 2007.
. Ann Arbor,
Mich.: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
Flannery, Kent V. 1976. The Early Mesoamerican Village. New York: Academic Press.
Flannery, Kent V, and Joyce Marcus. 1983. The Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec
and Mixtec Civilizations. New York: Academic Press.
Flannery, Kent V, Joyce Marcus, University of Michigan, and Museum of Anthropology. 2005.
Excavations at San José Mogote 1: the household archaeology. Ann Arbor: Museum of
Anthropology, University of Michigan.
Flannery, Kent V., and Joyce Marcus. 1976a. “Evolution of Thr Public Building in Formative
Oaxaca.” In Cultural Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of James Bennett Griffin. New
York: Academic Press.
———. 1976b. “Formative Oaxaca and the Zapotec Cosmos: The Interactions of Ritual and Human
Ecology Are Traced in This Interpretation of a Prehistoric Settlement in Highland Mexico.”
American Scientist 64 (4) (August): 374–383.
Flannery, Kent V., and James Schoenwetter. 1970. “Climate and Man in Formative Oaxaca.”
Archaeology 23 (2) (April): 144–152.
“Gregg Easterbrook: ‘The King Of Sports’ | The Diane Rehm Show from WAMU and NPR.” 2013.
December 6. http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2013-12-09/gregg-easterbrook-king-sports.
28
Griffin, James B, and Charles E Cleland. 1976. Cultural Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of
James Bennett Griffin. New York: Academic Press.
Guernsey, Julia. 2012. Sculpture and Social Dynamics in Preclassic Mesoamerica.
Halperin, Christina T, Society for American Archaeology, and Braunstein Symposium Annual
Meeting, ed. 2009. Mesoamerican Figurines: Small-Scale Indices of Large-Scale Social
Phenomena. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Henderson, John S. “Origin of the 260-Day Cycle in Mesoamerica.”
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~izapa/M-2.pdf.
Joyce, Arthur A. 2010. Mixtecs, Zapotecs, and Chatinos: Ancient Peoples of Southern Mexico.
Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Knight, Vernon J. 2013. Iconographic Method in New World Prehistory. Cambridge; New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Kowalewski, Stephen A. 1976. “Prehispanic Settlement Patterns of the Central Part of the Valley of
Oaxaca, Mexico.”
Lelyveld, MaryJo. 2011. “Beyond Swabs and Solvent Gels: Using Scenarios to Generate, Evaluate
and Navigate Conservation Futures.” In . https://aam-us.org/docs/default-source/center-for-the-
future-of-museums/lelyveld---beyond-swabs-and-solvent-gels.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Marcus, Joyce. 1998. Women’s ritual in formative Oaxaca: figurine-making, divination, death, and
the ancestors. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
Marcus, Joyce, and Kent V Flannery. 1996. Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in
Mexico’s Oaxaca Valley. New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson.
Marcus, Joyce, and Kent V. Flannery. 1994. “Ancient Zapotec Ritual and Religion: An Application of
the Direct Historical Approach.” In The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology,
29
edited by Ezra B. W. Zubrow and Colin Renfrew, 55–74. Cambridge University Press.
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/anthropology/v3922/pdfs/marcus_flannery.pdf.
———. 2004. “The Coevolution of Ritual and Society: New 14 C Dates from Ancient Mexico.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (52)
(December 28): 18257–18261.
Merritt, Elizabeth. “Center for the Future of Museums.” Center for the Future of Museums.
http://futureofmuseums.blogspot.com/.
Moser, Christopher L, Kent V Flannery, and Marcus Winter. 1970. Preliminary Archeological
Investigations in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, 1966-1969: A Report to the National Science
Foundatio . [S.l.]: Moser.
Neff, Hector. 2011. “Evolution of the Mesoamerican Mother Culture.” Ancient Mesoamerica 22 (01)
(March): 107–122.
“NMC Horizon Project Preview: 2013 Museum Edition.” 2013. The New Media Consortium.
http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2013-horizon-museum-preview.pdf.
Orr, Heather S, and Rex Koontz. 2009. Blood and Beauty: Organized Violence in the Art and
Archaeology of Mesoamerica and Central America. [Los Angeles, CA]: Cotsen Institute of
Archaeology Press.
Paddock, John, Ignacio Bernal, and Jay I. Kislak Reference Collection (Library of Congress). 1966.
Ancient Oaxaca; Discoveries in Mexican Archeology and History. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford
University Press.
Pannapacker, William. 2013. “No More Digitally Challenged Liberal-Arts Majors.” The Chronicle of
Higher Education, November 18. http://chronicle.com/article/No-More-Digitally-
Challenged/143079/.
30
Price, T. Douglas, Feinman, Gary M. 1993. Images of the Past. Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Pub.
Co.
Rappaport, Roy A. 1971. “The Sacred in Human Evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 2: 23–44.
RAPPAPORT, ROY A. 1971. “Ritual, Sanctity, and Cybernetics1.” AMAN American Anthropologist
73 (1): 59–76.
Redmond, Elsa M., and Charles S. Spencer. 2008. “Rituals of Sanctification and the Development of
Standardized Temples in Oaxaca, Mexico.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (02) (June):
239–266.
Rickards, Constantine George. 1938. “Monograph on Ornaments on Zapotec Funerary Urns.” Journal
de La Société Des Américanistes: 147–166.
Schiro, Mike. 2013. “3D Scanning of Bruce Nauman’s ‘From Hand to Mouth.’” Hirshhorn Museum
and Sculpture Garden. Accessed December 9.
http://www.hirshhorn.si.edu/collection/conserving-modern-materials/.
Sellen, Adam T. 2002. “Storm-God Impersonators from Ancient Oaxaca.” Ancient Mesoamerica 13
(01) (January): 3–19.
———. 2011. “Sowing the Blood with the Maize: Zapotec Effigy Vessels and Agricultural Ritual.”
Ancient Mesoamerica 22 (01) (March): 71–89.
Sharer, Robert J, David C Grove, and Jay I. Kislak Reference Collection (Library of Congress). 1989.
Regional Perspectives on the Olmec. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University
Press.
31
Sherman, R. Jason, Leah Minc, Christina M. Elson, Charles S. Spencer, and Elsa M. Redmond. 2013.
“Trace-Element Analysis on Pottery from Oaxaca.” Accessed December 2.
http://research.amnh.org/anthropology/research/mca/projects/oaxaca.
Skidmore, Joel. 2013. “Evidence of Earliest Maya Writing.” MesoWeb.com. Accessed November 6.
http://www.mesoweb.com/reports/SanBartoloWriting.html.
Spencer, Charles S., and Elsa M. Redmond. 2004. “A Late Monte Alban I Phase (300-100 B.C.)
Palace in the Valley of Oaxaca.” Latin American Antiquity 15 (4) (December): 441.
doi:10.2307/4141587.
Tate, Carolyn. 1999. “Patrons of Shamanic Power.” Ancient Mesoamerica 10 (02) (July): 169–188.
Taube, Karl. 1996. “The Olmec Maize God: The Face of Corn in Formative Mesoamerica.” RES:
Anthropology and Aesthetics 29/30: 39–81.
Urcid, Javier. 2005. Zapotec Writing: Knowledge, Power, and Memory in Ancient Oaxaca. Brandeis
University.
Whalen, Michael E. 1981. Excavations at Santo Domingo Tomaltepec: Evolution of a Formative
Community in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Museum of
Anthropology.
Whitecotton, Joseph W. 1977. The Zapotecs: Princes, Priests, and Peasants. Norman: University of
Oklahoma Press.
Winter, Marcus Cole. 1979. “Tierras Largas a Formative Community in the Valley of Oaxaca,
Mexico.”
Top Related