I,
.•~\}M6Ion81ForMt ()1'ftctIr i
Oeogarh Division
... ,
~rl~UA~wJ)AaI
t\NKIRA.
"
\
72 ISambalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I GopaipaJi I I. ,I v •. _ I .~ ~73 ISambalpurJ. Sambalpllli [arnankira 1 Gopalpali. I - I .--.. I.. . -:-..~-;. _ I -:.:: =, - . .
I , - ~. .... I .... r(\ ~ ~) I Priu::lt;> I ' Aarirllltllr;> v I n ~7n7 I n 1 c;nn I . • __
Tahsil) I Village Survey No. Type 1<issamPlot I Acres I Hectare
40 I Sarnbalpur] SambaJpurU?I1l?nl<iI?J_ Kllilari [ora 253/1112 (P) Private Agriculture 0.0247 0.0100
Slno District I Division Proposed Area for DiversionI
41 I Sambalpur] Sarnbalpur] [amankira I Kuilari jora \249/1115 ep) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0494 I 0.020042 Kuilari jor~-t 257/1016 ep) Patita I 0.1730 I 0.0700 I43 Siridi 1441 ep) Agriculture 0.2965 0.120044 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 660 ep) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0247 I 0.010045 I Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 787 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0247 I 0.010046 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 662 ep) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0494 I 0.020047 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 599 (P) I Private I Gharabari I 0.0494 I 0.020048 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 1439 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0247 I 0.010049 Siridi Agriculture 0.0247 0.0100 ''161/'''21.50 Siridi Gharabari 0.0247 0.010051 I Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 817 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0494 I 0.020052 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 788 ep) I Private I Agriculture I 0.1730 I 0.070053 I Sambalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I Siridi I 672/1731 (P) I . Govt. I Gochora ! 0.2718 I 0.110054 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 1460 (P) I Govt. I Agriculture I 0.0247 I 0.010055 :Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 657 (P) I Govt. I Patita I 0.0494 I 0.020056 I Sambalpur] Sarnbalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 1341 (P) I Govt. I Patita I 0.0247 I 0.01005-; I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I Siridi I 661 (P) I· Govt. I Nala I 0.0247 I 0.010058 I Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] jamankira I Siridi I 664 (P) I· Govt. I Nala I 0.0247 I 0.010059 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I Siridi I 1344 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.1977 I 0.080060 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 1342 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0988 I 0.040061 I Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I Siridi I 1340 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0741 I 0.030062 I Sarnbalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I Bijadiha I 118 (P) I Govt. I Bastf jogya I 0.0741 I 0.030063 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I Bijadiha I 110 (P) I Govt. I Nala I 0.0247 I 0.0100
l>Jw.ot' 'VuI64 0.1483 0.060065 0.3212 0.1300 .,66 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] [amankira I ,BijaEliftB I 141/315 (P) I Govt. I ., R6fttI,.. I 0.1730 I 0.0700 "67 I Sambalpur] Sarnbalpur] [arnankira I BijOlQihiv I 141/317 (P) I Govt. I • R-6ttt!- I 0.0247 I 0.0100 ••68 I Sambalpur] Sambalpur] jamankira I ~ijadiba I 141/318 (P) I Govt. I Basti Iogya I 0.0247 I 0.010069 GopalpaJi 52 (P) _ 0.4695 0.190070 Gopalpali 57 (P) 0.5684 0.230071 I Sarnbalpur] Sambalpur] [arnankira I GopalpaJi I 88 (P) I Private I Agriculture I 0.0741 I 0.0300
ltH~-
,Tahsil ) Survey No. \ Proposed Area for DiversionSlno District Division Village Type, Kissam
(Plot\ Acres Hectare80 SambaJpur SambaJpur [amankira Gopalpali 45 (P) - ,. - - .
. ~_:i, . ... . - -,
81 Sambalpur Sambalpur [arnankira Gopalpali 89 (P) ~ - ,
'_'.~"" .:, ,- - - ,- - --
82 Sambalpur Sambalpur [arnankira Gopalpali 49 (P) r._ .- -" - . : .. -:-:.:'" ..... -,
- ,::-. - ,
.•... --"
~~
,,-l<eC\l\i,e ~"JnatSU9Uoa ~.\-\.OW\
J\-\ft..RSUGUOft..
~-e..L
\
I \\
U'{fS'(tJ r ~/0AN OAi< /
'''RA
~ .'OMSIOnalForMt Offic8C '
Deogarh DiviiiOO
CHECK LIST NO. 09
Certificate from the project proponent that no alternative suitable non-forest land isavailable for the project in question, and that this is the best location from amongseveral alternatives considered and involving the barest minimum extent of forestland. : Attached
""",,
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Deogarh Forest Division inDeogarh District for up-gradating to 2-lane/2-lane withpaved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur to ChhatabarSection of NH-200 (Km 145.700to Km 192.000)in the State ofOrissa.
CERTIFICATE ABOUT NO ALTERNATIVE SUITABLE NON-FOREST LAND ISAVAILABLE
This is to certify that no alternative suitable non-forest land is available forup-gradating to 2-lane/2-lane with paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 145.700 to Km 192.000) in the State of Orissa andinvolving the barest minimum extent of forest land.
~I FClr88t OfficerDeogam Division
Date: Executive EngineerProject ImPlementation~U't-World Bank ProjectsN. H. Division, Deogarh 6J..\\~\\
Engineer£.xe... n o.ogarhf\.:i.~'v'-,~ I
Place: Deogarh
. . ....". .
.!....:... ~-. _._' -", ".~'~.
'- -- -
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-laneJ2-1anewith paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Orissa.
CERTIFICATE ABOUT NO ALTERNATIVE SUITABLE NON-FOREST LAND ISAVAILABLE
This is to certify that no alternative suitable non-forest land is available forup-gradating to 2-laneJ2-lane with paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km 145.700) in the State of Orissa andinvolving the barest minimum extent of forest land.
Date:
~ '=It 'DM;IonaI ForaIt Offic« j
Deogarh Division
Place: Deogarh
CHECK LIST NO. 10
Justification for locating the project in forest area to be given by the User agencyand countersigned by DFO. : Attached
r-- .
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Deogarh Forest Division inDeogarh District for up-gradating to 2-lane/2-lane withpaved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur to ChhatabarSection of NH-200 (Km 145.700to Km 192.000)in the State ofOris sa.
JUSTIFICATION FOR LOCATING THE PROJECT IN FOREST AREA
As the proposed project road is widening and up-gradation on existing road ofNH-200 for approach road to the major town Deogarh and at village KaradaKhaman, Pravasuni, Baragadia, Deogarh Town Unit 5, Bandhkhol, Hadamunda andPendrakhol in Taluka:- Deogarh; Badadanga Ghat, Sanadanga Ghat, Rengalbeda,Dhauragotha, Basant Pur, Ratna Khali Nali, Budido, Khairpali, Bhitarapada,Naulipada, Golabandha, Teliposi and Kirtan Pali in Taluka: Reamal and DeogarhDistrict.
1) It is best suitable alignment from technical point of view and requiring minimumforest area.
2) Earthwork cutting and banking is minimum.3) Minimum numbers of trees are affected.4) Road gradients are suitable for traffic.
There is no suitable alternative non-forest land to construct the road. Theproposed widening of NH-200 is mostly on existing road. Hence, the forest area isproposed for diversion.
~-----...,..()M6Ional Forest Officer
Deogarh DivisionDate: Executive Engineer
Project Implementation Unit-IlWorld Bank Projects ~N. H. Division, Deogarh \ ~ \1
e EngineerExec arh~.:t~\Yi ....:~n,t)eO!
Place: Deogarh
- .: ~. - ~' ..~ ';.'-.-~----....",..,..,.......--,--"
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-laneJ2-lanewith paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Orissa.
JUSTIFICATION FOR LOCATING THE PROJECT IN FOREST AREA
As the proposed project road is widening and up-gradation on existing road ofNH-200 for approach road to the major town Deogarh and at village Godarpada,Kuilari [ora, Siridi, Bijadiha Dhudikhol and Gopal Paii in Iamankira Tehsil andSambalpur District.
1) It is best suitable alignment from technical point of view and requiring minimumforest area.
·2) Earthwork cutting and banking is minimum.3) Minimum numbers of trees are affected.4) Road gradients are suitable for traffic.
There is no suitable alternative non-forest land to construct the road. Theproposed widening of NH-200 is mostly on existing road. Hence, the forest area isproposed for diversion.
Date: Executive Eyf~fft'i~Project ImrJlf.~JjlI?tl~World BalN. H. D'vi
DMsIonaI Foreat OfftcIr,Deogarh Division
Place: Deogarh
.- .. -C33) "".-. ..
CHECK LIST NO. 11
1"""\ ,
i,
Certificate for minimum use of forest land to be submitted by User Agency givingdetails of areas and trees involved in the alternatives examined and reasons fortheir rejection duly countersigned by DFO. : Attached
'" .
Title of the proposal.- Diversion of Forest Land in Deogarh Forest Division inDeogarh District for up-gradating to 2-lanej2-lane withpaved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur to Chhatabar __ --Section of NH-200 (Km 145.700to Km 192.000)in the State ofOrissa.
CERTIFICATE FOR M1NIl\1UM USE OF FOREST LAND
This is to certify that the forest area involved in the proposed is unavoidable andI"" barest minimum forest area i.e.Iq' ~.~~~a area is proposed for diversion.
Date: Executive EngineerProject Implementation , ~'1World Bank Projects . e~ \N. H. Division,Deo~. ve Engtne rh
".:4.':ivi_:~ntoe~a
Place: Deogarh
Counter signed by., ~------p~Divisional Forest OfficerDeo~orest Division
~~
-" '. .' ". .:... . .- .
Title of the proposal» Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-lane/2-lanewith paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Orissa.
CERTIFICATE FOR MINIMUM USE OF FOREST LAND
This is to certify that the forest area involved in the proposed is unavoidable andbarest minimum forest area i.e. 9.9672 ha area is proposed for diversion.
Date:
Place:Deogarh
Counter signed by:- ~3'1~Divisional Forest 0 icerBamra -RW~1J1iOi·!tiJ·GtnC~~a
Bamra~l .. 'OD
DMaIonal ForeIt OffICerDeogarh DWiaion
-----. ;
CHECK LIST NO. 12
Cost- Benefit analysis as per the guidelines issued under Forest (Conservation)Act, 1980 in Prescribed format. If not required reasons may be mentioned. :Attached
"....., ,
i
,-. ,
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
"Sr. ParametersNo.
Remarks
(A) Evaluation of Loss of Forest1 Loss of value of timber. Fuel wood and
minor forest produce on an annual basisincluding loss of man-hours per annum ofpeople who derived livelihood and wagesfrom the harvest of these commodities
2 Loss of animal husbandry productivityincluding loss of fodder
Loss of total 3986 nos. of trees mainlysala,Asan, Chara, Mahua, Amba and Misespecies which will be compensated bycompensatory afforestation and additionalavenue plantation within the ROW of theproject road.Animal Husbandry -NilLoss of fodder (l9.5808ha.) @ Rs 3000.00=Rs 58742.00
3 Cost of human resettlement Nil4 Loss of public facilities and administrative
infrastructure (Roads, buildings, Schooldispensaries, electric lines, railway etc) onForest land, or which would require forestland if these facilities were diverted due tothe project.
Nil
- 5 Environmental losses ( Soil erosion, effecton hydrological cycle, wildlife habitat,microclimate upsetting of ecologicalbalance
Minor environmental impact will beassociated due to proposed widening of theproject road but it will be localized andshort duration, which will be kept atmmimum through the compensatoryafforestation and taking care during civilwork, after construction it will reduce thetravel distance and fuel consumption ascompared to the existing situation
Environmental losses ( Soil erosion, effecton hydrological cycle, wildlife habitat,microclimate upsetting of ecologicalbalance) as per thumb rule prescribedenvironmental loss due to forest overi__~·;~~a. area of forest density , forperiod of 50 years(50.696Lakh xO.6 x19.5808)=Rs.5,95,60,094.00
~ •..•
Sr. Parameters RemarksNo.(B) Evaluation of Benefit1 Increase ill productivity Productivity will mcrease due to project
attributable to the specific construction,project Expansion of the road will provide improve and
safe connectivity to the local people, provideconnectivity to the other parts of the state roadswhich will attract the industrial growth in localareas.
2 Benefits of economy Due to 2-lane/2-lane with pave shoulderconfiguration of Bhojpur to Chhatarbarsection of NH-200 (Km 145.0128 tokm192.000) of the project road will savetime will, Fuel and maintenance of vehiclescost will be reduced. It will provide safe andfaster transport Jharsugoda, Deogarh,Chatarpur and Raurkela
3 No. of Population benefited About 40000 person will benefited
4. Employment benefit Direct economic benefit: During theconstruction phase and operation phase about200 no. of local person will get employmentfor 3 years.
5 Cost of acquisition of facility onnon-Forest land where ever Not feasiblefeasible
6. Loss of (a) agricultural and (b) Nilanimal husbandry productiondue to diversion of forest land
7 Cost of rehabilitating the NAdisplaced persons as differentfrom compensatory amountsgiven for displacement.
8 Cost of supply of free fuel-wood NAto workers residing in or nearforest area during the period ofconstruction
~
EX.~£ 11
[)Melon8I Forest OffIcer.Deogarh Division
• Enhance the safe connectivity along"'""
the highway side villages and markets
• Enhance the local employmentopportunity along with varIOUS
r-developmental works
r- • Improve the drainage condition alongthe highway
Details of positive and negativeimpact of the project is providedbelow
9POSITIVE IMPACTS
Key long-term environmental and socialbenefits from the project will arise mainlyfrom traditional sources, viz:
• savings in travel times, reduced cargodelays - from faster vehicle speedsand reductions in travel time;
• reduced vehicle operating costs - fromimproved riding surfaces;
• reduced road maintenance costs -from higher quality infrastructure;
• reduction in exhaust emission
• reduced accidents - mainly as a resultof reduced travel time and congestionbut also because of the provision ofsafety infrastructure and warrungsigns, though this latter element wasimpossible to quantify - it was,however, estimated that the benefitsfrom a 50% reduction in accidents;and
• improved access to various part of thecountry new businesses, includingthat from increased passing trade
Other tangible benefits associated with the projectare:
• Project will help m ribbondevelopment along the road
• Additional plantationhighway will enhancebeauty of the area.
NE~VE !MPACTS
along thethe aesthetic
1- Ir
fJMsK)nal Forest OfflC6l',Oeogarh [}Wi$ioO.,
The key negative, permanent and irreversibleimpacts will occur along the project road andwill be:
• Total 19.5808 ha RF/DPF/Revenueforest land will required to bediverted
• loss of 3986 treesRF/DPF/Revenue Forest
from
fl r~
~I Forest (jfftC~Oeogam Division
<;»
<;» ,
'-'
~Sr.
"-": No.1
-;»
'-',;
'-':,
~
'-'"./
'-'
"-'
"-'
'-':
4'--'
'-../0
'j
'-'
v' ,---..J./
<:»
'--'
'-'
'-'
'--'
.••••....
'-'
-::»
CATEGORY OF PROPOSAL RIR WHICH COSTS IS API1LICADLE
Nature of proposals Applicable/ Notapplicable
Remarks
All categories of proposalsinvolving forest land upto 20hectares III plains and upto 5heactare in hills.
YesLinear diversion
ofRF/DPF !Revenueforest along the
NH for 2-lane/2-lane with pave
shoulderconfiguration of
road.2 Proposal for defense installation
purposes and oil prospecting( prospecting only)
N/A
3 Habitation, establishment ofindustrial units tourist lodges/complex and other buildingconstruction
N/A
All other proposals involving forestland more than 5 hectare in hillincluding roads, transmission lines,minor, medium and major irrigationprojects, hydel project mmmgactivities, railway lines, locationspecific installations like rmcoro-wave stations, auto repair centers,T.V. towers etc.
NA
~, .'!Io"
------- -
~QMeIon8I Forest Offic8r
Deogarh Division
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-lane/2-lane
. with paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Oris sa.
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSISAnnexure VI (A)
Block:- Jamankira District:- Sambalpur
SL. Particulars Amount (Rs. Crores) RemarkNo.1 Total cost (Investment Incurred)(A) Construction Cost of Project "'2-\4 -\Sy
(B) N.P.V. Amount to be disposed @ 9.20 0-911lakh/Hactare
(C) Substitule / Alternation Planlation Cost to 0.20be disposed:-
Total 21S' c,sl2 Benefits:- Benefits from (Taking Age of 50 Years
Road As 50 Years)(A) Economics Benefits- Market Development Savings in vehicle operating
Taking costs, Benefits to tradeespecially in movement ofperishable goods, Reducedmaintenance costs, All rounddevelopment of areas,
(B) Direct Employment of Labours- About 200 labour will getdirect employment forduration of 3 yr
(C) Employment Genration Due to other Petty contracts to localActivities people, vehicles use, and
other activities will alsogenerate employment
Note Therefore construction of Economically YesViable and social beneficial.
Date:~~~Exec . e Engin t.\\~:~\1?'
Project Impleme on Unit-IIWorld Bank ProjectsN. H. Division, Deogarh
Place: Deogarh D4vi6lOnal Forest OfflC8f'Deogarh DMaion:
Title of the proposal:- Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-lanej2-lanewith paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Orissa.
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Parameter for Evaluation of loss of ForestsN fP 1 An VI (B)ature 0 roposa nexure
SI. Parameters Roads, Tr. Lines & Raliway lineNo.
1 2 31 Loss of value of timber, fuel wood and Approximately Rs. 1000/- per hectare annum
minor forest produce on an annual 9.9672 ha x 1000.00 = Rs. 9967basis, including loss of man hours perannum of people who derivedlivelihood and wage from the harvestof these commodities
2 Loss of Animals husbandry Loss of animal husbandry approximate Rs.productivity including loss of fodder 25000.00
Loss of Factor approximately Rs.25000.00Total Rs. 50000.00
3 Cost of human resettlement There will be no displacement due to theproject, so resettlement is not required.
4 Loss of public facilities and No loss of public facilities and administrativeadministra tive infrastucture (Roads, interest occurs.Buildings, Schools, Dispensaries,Electric Lines, Railways etc.) on whichwould require forest land if thesefacilitities were diverted due to theproject.
5 Environmental losses; (Soil erosion, Assuming the density of the Forest is 0.4effect on hydrological cycle, wildlife Environmental loss = 50.6966 lakh x 0.4 xhabitat, rnicroclimate upsetting of 9.9672 =Rs. 20212126.00ecological balance.) Loss for 50 years
6 Suffering to oustees Nil
Date: ~
\I t,t,\ rt\~~~~~\\,;~Execu e Engine ~\.•w-~ -r-rrr":
Project Implem tion Unit-IIW orld Bank ProjectsN. H. Division, Deogarh
DMleIOrlSl Forest Officer08og;am DWlsion
Place: Deogarh
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Title of the proposal'- Diversion of Forest Land in Bamra Wildlife Division inSambalpur District for up-gradating to 2-lane/2-lanewith paved shoulders configuration of Bhojpur toChhatabar Section of NH-200 (Km 131.000 to Km145.700) in the State of Orissa.
Parameter for Evaluation of Benefit, notwithstanding loss of ForestsNature of Proposal
Annexure-VI (c)SI. Prameters Roads Tr. Lines & Raliway lineNo.1 Increase in productivity attributable to the Productivity will be increase due to
specification project. project construction.2 Benefits to economy Economy of local people will be
increase by increasing tourism,development of local industry andhandicrafts and quick transportation ofagricultural produce and perishablegoods.
3 No. of population benefited. More than 400004 Employment potential. About 200 labour will get direct
employment for duration of 3 yr andindirect employment will also begenerated construction of project road.
S Cost of acquisition of facility on non forest Not feasibleland wherever feasible.
6 Loss of (a) agricuitural & (b) animal, Nilhusbandry production due to diversion offorest land.
7 Cost of rehabilitating the displaced persons as There will be no displacement due todifferent from compensatory amount given the project, so resettlement is notfor displacement. required.
8 Cost of supply of free fuel-wood to worders Local labours will be used forresiding in or near forest area during the construction activities.period of construction.
Date:M!\~~\~~
Exec~,.;Project Implem - ation Unit-IlWorld Bank ProjectsN. H. Division, Deogarh
Place: Deogarh0M6K>na1 Forest Officer
Oeogarh Dwision
I:',v ••.
OFFICE OF THE - .i' NAULIPADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, NAULIPADA
_ <or"._
~IQQ~gl ~I!:I ~l!1IQ~ f(W1~l.fJ~Q. ~IQ~~t(';'1. .BLOCK - REAMAL, DIST.- DEOGARH (ODISHA)
i«V"t\'
Cl~-fl<S() «OJ:" C~Vwf\RNAC J ) Date:-
'Cl- 0 b . oe -J°f--3 Ob, 01· 20 J 2...
~ q.![J~ e9' eo 0JeT, (2- ro rrtl
(SL9~C' sG),,) ZJ~'1 )
Letter No.:-
'.? ~ ;x
.1>'11-;;-') Cl . 0 6 ·o~ ,.90e3 '" ~ "'4g"2\~r'''''kG:J:I' '*l ~..'Jf'L
<XL~:)~ a~ £]J f1s~ ~~IBJ f}l~J 861\~Q, ~~~}=1~6J-<S2J ...~~~\~~ ~\~.'~2l" <1L~.~OcC·~i}~:~ ~'t\.cg~t1~.
. . .' '. ~. .
.Q'6l'J 6V\~~LI eS'1 Fl1:' n1~\.~' ~~ sflS(3f\'}~~ qC?J t:i? .
C\~F?- ~\~q~~. &L 4~~I\JI)"~.~J.Gl5~)~D~q.-z!~)·
. ~~OcCLL-'~9~t:'0~1'1£fii'1l'~ ':~~/t:S .~~. G2}6'-1 ~?J~ .. . ' ~~.~ ~\b'?~ (~\~C)~JOi)' 'd~ ~~. ~fi')&J-&~
. c.,C'~) Al~ q\~I? .~(() .~~2JfY.:;\.. ~~ q\~v ~ IJ'6 . fj~
. ~ ~tC~/;:>b\,L. ro 6\S11~' £1% ~67)r) ,qCj~\~ «B~~GLc)~C' .36[1 18q'J)ufrpv{~ M11'~)~J aP~I~~J (;>
q £ ~I ff{'J C\\"2" .D-~ f}~~. cg6'1. M1~7)C'~~/r;;;' ~6)~J )
~Sarplnch
NAVL1PAt>A G.p
're-
___ J
·i
, .1
<, - ~ -.~~ -,. --.~"!"- cr'U(}:~~,"~/,/
C! . ob· 0 e·,~,OeJ 1( - t)i -ia].)..
x
,() q~.C'I 06· o~ < •.90 e~ }t.<t :Y?..,t ~,cQl ~ f)-' ~ ....
~ G~!&' EJ~'1 fJ9-q&'~ .g 0i')Si Bl~~ ZJ~1'2'{t;~<;{l< :-:::~J~,9Cj)j '.~
c;'t ~ ~ \ ~ ~ O;--6).t t:l.~ 1 . qz~ G?O~6Q £j.<QCl e1" ,"~''Tis-c~ "Ci~;?t; S?16).9- ~~~~ C;;; I i:j~ s;'i ~t ~~ flU ~ Gte)~? . ~ I~-~ Cl~] 6,GI~lR~ '0,t&q~ ,f)rJO 0.. B~ ~1~2!R ~1 02'Q gc Q~ -q.~~:~~o~~. ~qiC'_.~at1 t. £1£1! ~ ~ C-;0/~ ~~ Q.i~ ~~;..;'~~ 6Ft' 0I,G7'f02- ,£}y~q~, frO-V ~~ '~~J c~>~ bJ-e?(.~---;,s: $'1. Mlv-') Qj fljl' ~i2!?' e:.:'02.1 A~ .'OB ~ ql ~Q~- 6b1 L J'6 &lE:\S\~ G"'z . . .r<) ~11:.r . 612, ''9.bl'-0l-\' '.-_~Z1 &-Zk-~-5\01 ~') _
~q fiG' .A~'r / ?1<$ttlCA~qCq~ ~'eA7orQl6IS'J' ~~l 610>71 r;;El& to;~!8'.5\1 ~\-2t· i1~8,~~.{AS~, '. ~~P),('~.~I';~·:0~1~7-,=;,
. , .... /." . ~ J,J-y?t" 'f .i
~?'N' r;}- YJ~-. '~I~' :\
, . " . ()£)v7\.,.k f'J .' th ., .~1~1],-' ~:;~~~;~;6'?~}~\? ..~':L!Er€i!Jj~ , . '. . " -, '.. ~~~~.~~ _ .'. -n" .. '. -·r'. - -. --':":-"S'~~o~SJ?) (~\-;
. ....-:--:,.OJ)6) tLc:t.9~~~.J.~.tA.... ~, .
:--;J,/.fb.-.?fC ~. .S~~ Q) . , '~,.. \ ~ \ 2--- .". ::S' . l~\ \~;;;7/)};;>;;;;;:1' . . pB-:rt:=~;,
ii46 a G ~5Ll' '. _ . ., ' , ' .. =r>.' . - /l'l't1 ~ ~W&r?(~(;~\t0
'loo @..
-., - ..--. - ." .\
I
ir
\~,
, '~!
,......., ..
J~.:j,':v r
",
Jf'11--
L
TAHA I OAR 1l OEOC; foL
~ c..jAHAS :UAR<, Reamal
--~\
.....-------. 1- __ - --~--"1\",J ~r.. .•. ~'~ ••••••••••••••••• _ •• _~
I:i' - 4fJ.a:J c UJ 0"101Jll(j~11. I\.o...--J}: ,.;)horZ Cn~~.Ir/a...
1
J1l
@/---
:.••.. "; ~- .
:', ,
"" "
-.;, .. '
, "!',
=1: ',,-.. .' .~
I .... 0"
. j' •.
1 .
~- ~Je' @ete-~
L ~~~"~ ~()j2~:CP-k\.}
~ ~(' f9'~6$~~6: ~ J- ~f ~"'f' "i~I
.c 'ii1q&(~~Q~f(jI 6). 4'qJ;I ~Cl, ~I -obi'C:P f5)(
'1 ~~\ ~~S--I b G" ;zy-, (( -D 111
tn'7" '!("R?- 1- T Pt( ffffo-L"'- ~~ahu .
[It ~ ~~ ~\ (..(t':;~~ \c ,,
IS • ~(~;~) fJ '-%f f - \!2.1:;»tf;d)I',( O[,~ '2J )
/' --- -_ ....
,;£:::: '. '7':,'= -~
I •• ~ __ --'-----"""""+ +'-'" . - .~.~1-~~7~--~----_. . . _::::::=:scz:::::;c;au ~-..-------
......-.... _._,- .
:!·1,....... .
.1
II
--"..
. S~R9~t-lCH·..tU' I.' ~Gn'- U;J ••\J .r
,....,....
.1
--.-*~".- F EOFTHE-....•
LEIBANI GRAM PANCHAYAT, TILEIBANI~G~~~~ ~I~ ~tgl.a~ Qld~Itfii'.a.~6~Q~a
£l~la~ «1~G' - G'6~QQ~, §~I - 6~9Q~
I-
fl~ ~r'fJll{/ - {3D 6l/QfJf - EEt/'V 'f
Of~~~G'3t09 ~~~(f\LJ21 q,A~)o \,9PI ~3) .e..~ ~ 2Si~'2-~"
~~ Q~, ----rc.'Y"he ~ 1 \ 4-r\S?r9i,<~&20t~ 'dGji/~~' ~
7- ')<
.' ~
-re.,'Q1 O\~JOI~31e.-~9\.·2> ~~ .e~. tl~~~' ~~tJ).-PJ~~
_Y:f)Ol~rnli2;\. ~~\~ ~~~C;;ct,~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~1,:?~~1.~'
~ ~.OCW'~ qflZO ~,,\~-' Jjl~~l< ~. e ~,-C\~ "L~~:J ~ ~ ~~-i\ Nfb" @~~C ~~~ ~0~' '&~?1c\7 ~"'t1C;, ..
x.tf~~~.,· .~rH~ 0'Cl~ s:l-V)q~ 3trtJ') 3q~~ ~~~~~~Ji;;l ~"2 ~~ ~'?:>~~~ W,~~ ~~~'~~2~2~ ~H'~I~ -¥o<~~"
. <0\~? "1~=fl{~' G--<lI~b .-1~ c;(\(,\vl~ :az~'2 .~b")'?.·<'I't1~II)'.~. '.6'GC.\s&-l0L~ s;q~~. ~~Cl6\f ~(~"r)~I. Q'ij)~.(3"1~ \ <D~ -11'-)\~ .
dl9>W~: .~'~1'''Q .-1~' ~C)I ~~.Ol\~-. ~ fJ~~6'1 3~'" .:rYl' ... . . . . '.
~R:..'" .~ ....~'Z dq~~~ ~.0\-n'~ N1~~ trI)"g.q~41 ~~~, '.
~.JIsarpa~chiileibat)' G.P.
-- ~
Top Related