1
An Analysis of Mass Media and Technology in Hans-Georg Gadamer Rev. Lorenzo Ruga, SMITH (PhL/Ma)
Abstract
This paper discusses the philology of mass media, the analysis on the influences to Dasein,
the results that contributes to the downfall of the beautiful and the rationality of the public absorbed
in the mass media and technologies. The fundamental understanding of what we call mass media
is the collective entities of print, radio and television. Now that we have the internet, then we shall
include this online media to the collection because it contains almost everything, the same online
print, online television and the online radio. I belong to a congregation which uses mass media as
our apostolate. I choose this topic in order to know the nature of mass media, to set my foot upon
my limitations and to align myself to what I should be doing lest my mass media will fall into the
categories of Heidegger as the most brutal sources of objectification.
However, with the pastoral vision of Vatican II, the church cannot just be a sleeping giant.
She had been hiding in her sacristies contemplating God and polishing her golden vessels and
candelabras. The church must go to the world and preach the Good News. I will not enter into the
boundaries of theology but I wish to take the command of God to preach and use the screens and
radio booths as pulpits rescuing the secular in the world losing its meaning. I argue media is neutral
which means it can be used for evil and can be used for good. Just as a knife can cut your fruits
and vegetables for your cooking moments, it can also be used to stab you to death.
Inter Mirifica of the Vatican II document says the church will be at fault if she will not use
this wonderful media gifted by God to mankind. Let this be handed not for the advantage of evil
men. The church must expand its pulpit by sitting in radio booths with headset on her head, to
project herself before cameras of television, establish its own offset machines and communicate
to her children throughout the world hungry for her teachings.
2
Keywords: Hans-Georg Gadamer, Martin Heidegger, mass media, objectification, Dasein,
inauthenticity, natural sciences
Mass Communications in Heidegger and Nietzsche
I started from Heidegger because he is the mentor of Gadamer to which he was influenced
in his line of thinking. Actually, three of them, Husserl, Dilthey and Heidegger were very much
mentioned in the Truth and Method as having to be very much indebted.1 Nietzsche had long ago
criticized journalism as the “prostitution of the spirit.”2 Again in the Thus Spoke Zarathustra, he
says, “Do you not see the souls hanging like dirty, limp rags? And they also make newspapers
from these rags.” In the Human all too Human, he commented that the media is more than a
permanent false alarm that leads the ears and senses off in the wrong direction.
When journalism was already much spread and became inseparable in the coffee of the
each morning in Europe, it was in this time to which Nietzsche gave the impression of judging that
age of more danger and problems and the creeping will to power is again alive. Not that the will
to power is already dead but the will to power creates more ways in order to be more alive. He was
correct to sadly say that the will to certainty is the will to power. He who uses the mass media is
the proud man who prints his ideas in order not to try to persuade others but to subjugate and shape
them. The will to power is the source of constituting the human, thus swaying him away from
authentic subjectivity. The one behind these newspapers, radio and television is the verbose self
as dirty rags who will not stop in expressing himself and be affirmed by his readers and viewers.
1 Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (London:
Continuum, 1975), xxiv. 2 Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Vintage, 1974), 103.
3
Thus what the expressive and the verbose vomits is fed to the people thus presides the collective
in their everyday breakfast and their everydayness.3
Heidegger, coming from Nietzsche, says “Our age is an agitated one… In our time it is
merely by means of an echo that events acquire their greatness – the echo of the newspaper.”4
Because of the newspaper, we had learned to be lazy and no longer be a Dasein. We are again
trapped to mere signification, mere printed things where we do not discover truths by themselves.
We had surrendered our judgments to the will of the authors and be shaped by them, thus loses the
semantic meaning of true events and experience. No authentic experience can be derived from
reading these signification than in being Dasein. The echo produce no true meaning nor does it
brings truth to the self. By being passive, we are drawn to be objectified. One can never arrived to
correct impressions and ideas but like a balloon, we float in the hubris and vomits of the
expressives, thus we are shaped by them. Heidegger blatantly pronounced, “The mass media is an
idle talk worthy of despise.”5 I was hurt by these statements because I am using mass media and
he equated it as mere idle talk.
From a glance and from its effects, our local ABS-CBN and GMA, is guilty of this. Many
of what is projected is but mere idle shows where people spend their precious time as never a
leisure but an offense against the spirit of truth. It offends our behavior and it is never a leisure.
This is why our degree of rationality is very low because we spend so much time listening to these
idle shows and newspaper who has nothing to do with our rationality. Imagine how many Filipinos
spend their precious time and judgments before the television and this television becomes a habit
3 David Dwan, Idle Talk: Ontology and Mass Communications in Heidegger. Accessed February 14, 2015,
http://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Heidegger,Martin/textsonHeidegger/ DwanDavidHeideggerOnOntologyAnd
MassCommunication.pdf, 114. 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid.
4
of “pagpapalipas ng oras.” Is it not that time is gold? And we have learned this “pagpapalipas ng
oras” in the most brutal manner that sickens our rationality and intellectual rise. Seldom do I hear
a person answering me with expectation and hope, “What are you doing now?” “Ito, nagpapalipas
ng oras sa library.” Wow! The mass media greatly offends the innocence of children for having
been shaped by them and no longer of their parents and teachers. How could they become good
citizens? Thus Gadamer pronounce the same radical act of leaving the television alone.
How do you turn off a thing like that? How do you get the box to be quiet? I pressed every
imaginable button, to no avail. Finally, I was the last to leave the nothingness of the empty
room. Such is the extent of my expertise.6
What then the media does to our speech environment? In Heidegger’s eyes, technologies
such as radios and newspapers distorted social interaction and damaged the communicative tissue
of our world.7 The mass media interferes in our heart to heart communication especially inside the
home. This is demonstrable. The father is in his newspaper. The son to his radio exclusive in his
room. The daughter to his pocketbooks. The mother in her favorite telenovelas. Where families
then face each other while in their meals and discusses issues of healing and love and problems to
be addressed, now new scenario entered in this media-saturated stage. We eat with the television
as the presider of our everyday meals. We no longer eat as a family. We go to sofas and position
ourselves in almost disrespect. It is no longer giving thanks to God for the blessing of food but
giving thanks to the television for entertaining a meaningless life.
Thus Heidegger says newspaper and radios are the symptoms of the das Man. It is the
medium where the das Man moves. A kind of black hole predicates as the loss of meaning. Oswald
Spengler described the press as ‘a monstrous intellectual Something’ and Heidegger’s das Man is
6 Hans-Georg Gadamer, “Culture and Media”, Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of
Enlightenment, Axel Honneth ed. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992), 171. 7 Dwan, Idle Talk: Ontology and Mass Communications in Heidegger,115.
5
characterized by an equally sublime anonymity.8 The media is the site of indeterminacy, thus
inauthentic being. If you don’t take this action of going away from media, it will objectify you and
will consume your spirit. Authenticity can only be reclaimed when Dasein rescues itself from this
anonymous verbal drift and grounds itself as a self-determining and self-accountable entity.9
Heidegger returned to this point in a later lecture and insisted that the ‘superman’s appearance
is… inaccessible to the teletypers and radios dispatches of the press’.10 In order to be authentic
again, like the superman who went up the mountains and meditate, the man who wishes a true
rationality shuts away from media.
What is the meaning of all these and what is the concern of Heidegger? The newspaper
colludes with the modern subject for the purpose of objectification and representation. The modern
subject bearing the title of “will to power”, this kind of self-empowerment which he calls self-
fulfilling dominion of the subject, extends this dominion through the mass media. The proud man,
in the name of creating a “useful paper”, something an aid for everyone to know the current events
in our society and in the world, actually targets objectification thus forecloses the so many
becoming. The reign of the modern subject is the reign of the Ge-Stell- the subjectivist ordering of
the world. Oswald Spengler had already outlined the way newspapers ‘determine “the truth”’,
insisting that what it obtains is ‘just its truth’.11 They do not really determine the truth but only
determine their truth.
Newspapers reify the world through language. Heidegger says,
Everything is levelled to one level. Our minds hold views on all and everything, and view
all things in the identical way. Today every newspaper, every illustrated magazine, and
every radio program offers all things in the identical way to uniform views … The one-
sided view… has puffed itself up into an all-sidedness which in turn is masked so as to
8 Ibid. 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid., 118.
6
look harmless and natural. But this all-sided view which deals in all and everything with
equal uniformity and mindlessness … reduces everything to a univocity of concepts and
specifications the precision of which not only corresponds to, but has the same essential
origin as, the precision of technological process.12
This industrial circuit is a result of industrial revolution. Its real nature is to set public
opinion to swallow a configured opinion to configure the public, burning them in an available
conflagration. This is all the sickness of the modern man – to extend his purpose of objectification.
The method is repetition. As the saying goes, repeat what is wrong and soon it becomes a law. The
media is indeterminate to truth but determinate to the workings of objectification of the subject. It
is not a help to man but of losing its origins. Words are no longer used in order to understand
ourselves and our needs but words are merely used as a tool in order to be lost. ‘Words are
constantly thrown around on the cheap, and in the process are worn out’.13
By mass media through its idle talk, does an infinite passing of words and infinite passing
of idle talks and offense against the spirit of truth. The chatter is the hero as Kierkegaard says in
The Present Age, where the das Man creeps, all kinds of media, publicity and advertising that
burdens the Dasein’s true being. Daily is a flow of idle talk, flow of indeterminacy, flow of
inauthenticity, of objectification and representation. The media creates an infinite offense and
infinite regress. Through this technology, the communication of errors of the dominating modern
man multiplies itself so easily in all houses and in all countries. Dasein is left absorbed. When you
ask someone, “Eh, bakit daw ganun?” “Eh kasi yun ang sabi ng balita sa telebisyun.” Our
generation is media-saturated. Repeating Heidegger’s words, he says, “The metaphysics of
subjectivism and its counterpart, technology, culminate in the brutal objectification of the world.”14
12 Martin Heidegger, What is Called Thinking? trans. E. D. Wieck and Glenn Gray (New York: Harper and
Row, 1968), 33-34. 13 Dwan, Idle Talk: Ontology and Mass Communications in Heidegger, 127. 14 Ibid.
7
Having all these said and looking at our apostolate, I am bit disheartened. We shall then
proceed to the thoughts of Gadamer.
The Philology of Mass Media
Gadamer, like many philosophers, would always start philosophizing by never neglecting
to explain the history of the word’s origin and its first meaning. This is philology. Philology is the
study of the structure, historical development, and relationships of a language or languages.15 It is
his favorite style which is very helpful, for our sake. In the Truth and Method, he did the same
thing. He started discussing the origin of bildung, erfahrung, erlebnis, play etc. To start this, he
split the mass media by first discussing media, then the mass and then communication.
Media means to mediate or to act as a mediator. It mediates yet its addressee is anonymous
or rather it addressees everyone. It is that which is between us, connects us with one another, but
also carries us in the way that water unites and carries fish.16 The crowd of onlookers and curious
bystanders who turn on the television set every night is a kind of trap which is characterize by an
element that surrounds and carries a flood of information, and we are all swimming in it as though
it were water. It has the function of mediation and has the additional connotation of being that
which is between us in such a way as to surround and carry us all.17 If Heidegger tells us that media
is only a flow of idle talks, Gadamer sees it as a flood. In short, by turning the television, with the
intention of knowing maybe news or whatever, we allow information to come to us and since it is
15 Catherine Soanes and Angus Steveson (ed.), Concise Oxford English Dictionary 11th ed. (Oxford
University Press). 16 Hans-Georg Gadamer, “Culture and Media”, Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of
Enlightenment,173. 17 Ibid.
8
a flood of information, we died from drowning. Our spirits experienced death because of these.
We thought we are regularly swimming but in truth, we are being objectified to our death.
The mass is a dough. It is given a particular shape by the cook. But it is now associated to
a mass of people as for example a mass traffic. It connotes a certain heaviness on the part of
humanity. Communication, which appears in Karl Jaspers, according to Gadamer, came from the
culture of the Romans. Communication refers to public debate on matters at hand. It is a living
conversation for the assembled masses which has nothing to do with what we called mass media
or mass communication today. These three connotes a depart from the original and is highly
chaotic: the media that drowns, the mass that is heavy and communication that do not debate. Thus
he asks,
To an unthought-of extent, information is being pumped into our lives, and this flood of
information must be channeled such that it does not destroy our culture, the cultura animi,
the culture of the human soul and mind, but fosters it. Are we not exposed to an excess of
mediations?18
What is critical about mass media is the excesses of mediations, excesses in the use of
language which bears no significance to real issues. The media is a kind of filling up the boredom
in this life and the solution is to refire it. There is no concern for intellectual rise. Evident to this
are the jokes on the radios or the advertising which terminates to excesses of lies. The sorrow it
shares is a chain that binds the shaping of our lives. The augmentation of mediations and the
immediacy it has (agad-agad) is what sickens the souls in the world. When you turn on the internet
or television, the information is immediate and it immediately drown you to its world. The
mediation is super immediate. This immediacy, its spontaneity, according to Gadamer, is what we
should be aware of.
18 Ibid., 176.
9
The Concept of Play19 and Mass Media
We shall go back to the ontology of play of Gadamer. What is then the relation of play to
mass media? In play, it is neither the player nor the spectator that is the most important but it is
the play. Play fulfills its purpose only if the player loses himself in play. Play is independent of the
consciousness of the player - it has its own essence. Its goal is “redemption and transformation
back into true being.” Instead the work of art has its true being in the fact that it becomes an
experience that changes the person who experiences it. The play is characterized by the to and fro
movement and is irrelevant whether or not there is a subject who plays it. The play has its primacy
than the players. Thus, whoever tries is the one tried, whoever plays is the one being played. We
have seen that play does not have its being in the player's consciousness or attitude, but on the
contrary play draws him into its dominion and fills him with its spirit. In re-presenting, the work
of art performs a "total mediation", that is what has been "transformed into structure" is made fully
available to us once again.
This is precisely what mass media does. The play was used by Gadamer in order to show
us that by gazing into the beautiful, in the art, the result is redemption of souls and transformation
into the original which is a very beautiful explanation of Gadamer. In the play, the players are lost
in the spirit of the game but it results to a return in one’s true being. I would say that players
becomes a child again, happy and innocent while playing. I think this is the goal of our daily life.
Do not forget to be a child no matter how intellectual you are. The play changes the person, it tries
the person, it is absorbed the person in its spirit thus performs a total mediation. What happens is
transformation or a new structure is built in our understanding or consciousness. This is precisely
what happens before the beautiful or before an art.
19 Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, 102ff.
10
This is negatively and precisely what happens to us before the mass media. The great
difference I suppose is the immediacy. The art reveals its meaning later and is not immediate.
Maybe to some, it is immediate but it reveals something more for a beautiful art reveals more. The
mass media is immediate. Borrowing the different conditions from the ontology of play, the mass
media creates havoc after all. From the same analogy, we can say that because of the media, the
person is changed. Have we not noticed the same attitude children or adults nowadays? Have they
not been changed a lot having been so exposed in the media. The mass media tries the person and
absorbed their spirit. Mass media performs this total mediation, forming a different structure that
do not contribute to understanding and meaning of this life. If the art’s ultimate goal is meaningful
understanding, the mass media is chaos and inauthenticity.
Mass Media and Technology
By the use of technologies, people nowadays no longer treasure the wonders of the
alphabets. Gadamer would like us to reminisce the importance of writing using our hands rather
than through mechanical means in our computers. I can be guilty of this because I am doing my
paper through a computer. Nevertheless, our generation nowadays appreciate more the advent of
computers and the different kinds of technologies, a life so mechanical – a kind of triumph of
science over the human sciences. But to the extent of meaning, I knew it is still meaningful to write
letters by our own handwriting than by just typing them. Remember the days when you first learned
to write maybe in Nursery or Preparatory, crooked it may be.
The exercise of handwriting is still more beautiful than the mere printed one. How the past
and the discovery of the alphabet made a great leap in our being, the start where our tongue started
to speak and we can understand each other rather than by just symbols, to whom our generations
11
have abused them. People no longer cherished of what we called communication. It is no longer
an exchange of what is beneficial but a horrendous condition of idle talks and intellectual demise.
See the many comments in the internet and evaluate how conversations are done. Remember how
the alphabet had brought us the stories of the past, their lives totally dedicated to handwriting. We
had not appreciated music nowadays because we have not played any single instrument. We do
not even know how to play them. We have been lazy in music and we have depended ourselves
from music stored in our cellphones or DVD’s.
To the extent that all these technologies unlikely brings us freedom which is actually an
enslavement of our spirits. When everything can be immediate nowadays, we have lost the
meaning and the history of all these important leap in our lives. Technology had been hailed as a
great leap but in truth actually we are in the road to fatal mistake and dark fate. When children
nowadays just use keyboards and have not learned how to write poetry, to be creative and to keep
the fire of philosophic discourse, we have entered into a paralyzed conditions.
Gadamer says:
Thus, you may still be accused today with the friendliest of intentions of feeling obliged to
stand up for objectivity and epistemological assurance of the foundations of scientific
knowledge in the area of the Geisteswissenschaften. What a perversion of all points of
emphasis! As though it were necessary to put up a special fight for the victory round of
modern science and of scientific research! This was the great achievement of the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries: to bring about the victory of our experience of the
world based on mathematics and methodology.20
With the plurality of technologies and the reach of mass media can do nowadays, we have
judged our situations as having reached quality of life. The concern about the quality of life reveals
that the increase in the numbers and kinds of possibilities that science, technology, and economics
provide does not represent an unequivocal guarantee in terms of a corresponding increase in quality
20 David Dwan, Idle Talk: Ontology and Mass Communications in Heidegger, 181.
12
of life. If then they call it quality life, so the atomic bomb and weapons secured by nations are also
having to do with quality of life. Gadamer reminds us that “Mass media contain an apparatus of
endless mediation and intrication; thus the immediacy of spontaneous judgment and of
spontaneous address is threatened again and again.” Let us never be deceived by the achievement
of science. The human sciences will always be the most important to consider. “One imagines
some kind of controlling force that can procure clarity by means of measurement, weighing, or
calculation and thus assure one that everything is all right.”
The life world of today is a continuous striving for plethora of technology, from the
destructive to the useful, of the something I can do to my keyboards and keypads every second of
my life, of the humongous time spent in that box where news, telenovelas, and advertisings are
shown. The question lies why do we spend our life to these technologies? The Ecclesiastes tells
us, “Vanity of vanities.”21 Human beings do not realized that they had been trapped from the
strategy by showing him so many things to see. This strategy is marketplace strategy where like in
the market, there are a lot of clothes, food, the noise of the sellers, the sounds of horns and tricycles
so that the person is distracted from his choices. The first phase is massive production and the
second is the marketing of these materials. The wise Solomon reduced these materials as mere
toys. I was wrong to think that only children play toys but I realized that we too play toys. The
more surprising is that, we as elders would kill people just to get these toys, would rather die than
losing these toys, would steal and deceive people just to possess all these toys.
Still fresh in my memory a decade ago when me and my assistant was in a jeepney in
Buendia and suddenly two men passengers, one in the rear and another inside announced with gun
on hand, “Hold up ito. Ilabas lahat ng pitaka, alahas at cellphone.”22 Sometimes the gun is just a
21 Ecclesiastes 1:14 22 This is hold up. Give us your wallets, mobile phones and your jewelries.
13
toy or real but no bullet inside but we are not really sure. In this uninvited situation, our fear first
overcomes us and we don’t anymore think if the gun is really firing or not. When it is stealing, that
is made in the Philippines and this happens often. Even in MRT or LRT, they would announce to
everyone, “Mag-ingat sa mandurukot.”23 How scandalous that was to foreigners and to children,
though this was true, because I am a Filipino and my fellow Filipino are thieves maybe that one
just right beside you. In formula, “Pilipino=magnanakaw.” Mobile phones was then seldom
touchscreen. One by one gave their phones, rings, watches, earrings and necklaces. They were not
able to get anything from us because I am a missionary and I have no phone nor jewelries. But the
woman beside me was still sympathetic to her new touchscreen cellphone and would not give it
anyway. But the gun was already pointed on her head. Other passengers advised her to give it
anyway or else she die. In short, the thirst of men today is to have all these toys.
Now why needed all these toys? Well, to fill up the boredom in life. The spending of time
in games, internet, television, and the like are manifestation of this filling up. And why fell bored?
Because the spirit is not filled. The logic of toys as a remedy is not correct. The summary is that,
if I am bored, I resort to my keypads but it does not solve my boringness. The more toys I have,
the more I am not satisfied. So why not address the spiritual needs where you could find rest?
The advent of these technologies was brought to us by science. The medicine for the
restlessness of human is technology. The laboratories and factories are anywhere in the world. The
schools supported these current by providing all kinds of computer courses to students. The reason
is that you can never get a job unless you have no knowledge in operating a computer. The
surprises we have is that very few enroll in history, arts, literature and philosophy because they
call it as nonproductive sciences therefore a waste of time and waste of tuition fees. I went to
23 Beware of thieves.
14
Ateneo a couple of months to submit my final paper to Dr. Garcia and found a poster there in the
Philosophy Department which says, “If you want to disappoint your mother and your father, your
friends, your grandfather and grandmother etc., take philosophy.” And I thought why? Well, there
is no much money in becoming a literature or philosophy teacher. It is disappointing to those who
expect me and you that after college, I can provide more money to them but sorry deep in my heart
and my profession, I am a philosophy teacher with no much money to give because I am striving
to be human.
The honorable CS Lewis wrote about heaven and hell and entitled that work The Great
Divorce. The human and natural sciences to me is also The Great Divide and a losing divide. This
is not saying that that heaven in the Great Divorce was philosophy and hell is the natural sciences.
But the current of students today is that and no one can deny it. The fault can be accused to our
educational systems. The highway is occupied by the natural sciences and the narrow gate to the
human sciences.
Since the natural sciences produced something physical, then we call it the productive
sciences and since humanities do not teach something practical, then it must not be recommended.
For the natural sciences, the study of literature today is a waste of time and scandalous. Seeing a
man in quite places and reading for instance a novel or a philosophy book, that scene can really be
agitating to a hardworking man. Why? Because reading does not produce a breakfast. Only by
working does you have something to eat. Remember the story in The Little Prince of the merchant
and the resting man. He told the man, “You could have been like me if you just work.” If you
work, then you can earn money. Then if you have money, you can buy a land. If you have a land,
then you could build a house. And if you have a house, you can rest.” And the man said, “That is
what I am already doing, I am resting.”
15
Now, why reading, why arts, why philosophy? Because life is not modus vivendi alone as
Habermas points out. The act of reading, of writing may not be a massive production of something
graspable, but by literature, we end up understanding what life is all about. It is by contemplation
that we grow in understanding. Our hearts and our soul are filled with motivations and
understanding to keep going which technology cannot produce. Reading is a divine time. Time
and again, as Gadamer says, we must forget ourselves, because to be truly human is to forget the
self. Only by the forgetting of the self we are able to understand the other.
Technology tries to satisfy our physical needs and our cravings by producing something
we can enjoy and grasp. Globe Telecom texted me these. “Enjoy and have digital fun using your
postpaid.” “Fill your world with wonder. Enjoy GoSurf and all-day music.” “Globe Gadgetcare is
a Worry-Free way to protect your gadget.” The mindset we are given is almost terrible which we
do not realized. This is precisely the problem that dominates the whole world today. This was
produced by the natural sciences. The centering to a life of technology for the satisfaction of our
physical needs and we have neglected our spiritual needs, thus affected our whole being craving
for more. The spirit is not satisfied, the human craving craves for more. The unsatiated craving
results to all crimes. The point is that if we do not treat this carnal cravings, then problem will
continue in the world.
Gadamer's linkages between truth and wirkungsgeschichte, bildung and phronesis may
become lost in the concern for technology and how the present generation utilizes it to construct a
future.24 Rahner and Gadamer have the same profound concerns about the impact of propaganda
and mass-advertising in consumer-dominated societies: 'What one has to exercise above all is the
ear.'25 A fortiori the worlds of virtual reality and the social constructions of the web and internet
24 The Future as Gift, 122. 25 Ibid., 124.
16
provide models which may well generate even more pragmatic, instrumentalist scepticism.26 Thus
David Harvey suggests that the culture of rapid industrial mass production, of the instant and the
disposable, of ever changing fads and fashions, has inculcated a wider sense of the insignificance
of the particular and the intrinsic ephemerality of much else in life (including values and codes of
behaviour), and has heightened our sense of the prospects for the instant obsolescence of human
life itself. In related vein Richard Kearney reminds us of the effective commodification and
marketing of such simulacra as the image and other virtual substitutes for reality.
26 31 Richard Kearney, The Wake of Imagination (London 1994), 359. 32 The phrase is David Harvey's. See
The Condition of Postmodernity, e.g., Ch. 16. 33 See Harvey, Condition of Postmodernity, 286. 34 See Kearney Wake
of Imagination, 37 If. See also Harvey, Condition of Postmodernity, 289f 63ff
17
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Primary Sources
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer on Celan: "Who Am I and Who Are You?" and Other Essays.
Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. USA: State
University of New York Press, 1997.
__________________. Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied
Hermeneutics. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. USA: State
University of New York, 1992.
__________________. Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary
Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. USA: New York Press, 1994.
__________________. Reason in the Age of Science. Translated by Frederick Lawrence. USA:
Baskerville, 1998.
__________________. The Gadamer Reader. Edited by Richard Palmer. Illinois, Northewestern
University Press, 2007.
__________________. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Translated by Nicholas
Walker. USA: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
__________________. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G.
Marshall. Great Britain: Continuum Books, 1986.
Secondary Sources
Aquilina, Mario. The Event of Style in Literature. UK, Palgrave McMillan, 2014.
Brock, Bernard, Robert Lee Scott, and James W. Chesebro, ed. Methods of Rhetorical Criticism:
A Twentieth-century Perspective. USA: Waynastate University Press, 1990.
Dubey, A.P., ed. Modernity and the Problem of Cultural Identity. New Delhi: Northern Book
Center, 2008.
Kellner, Douglas. Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity and Politics between the Modern and
the Postmodern. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Krajewski, Bruce, ed. Gadamer's Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics.
California: University of California Press, 2004.
18
Levin, David Michael, ed. Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin's
Philosophy. USA: Northwestern University Press, 1997.
Michelfelder, Diane, Richard E. Palmer, ed. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida
Encounter. USA: State University of New York, 1989.
Mootz, Francis, and George H. Taylor, ed. Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for
Contemporary Hermeneutics. Great Britain: A&C Black, 2011.
Wright, Kathleen, ed. Festivals of Interpretation: Essays on Hans-Georg Gadamer's Work. USA:
State University of New York Press, 1990.
Online Sources
Christians, Clifford, Shakuntala Rao, Stephen J. A. Ward, and Herman Wasserman, ed. Toward
a Global Media Ethics: Theoretical Perspectives. January 2008. Accessed February
14, 2015. http://works.bepress.com/shakuntala_rao/7.
Dwan, David. Idle Talk: Ontology and Mass Communications in Heidegger. Accessed February
14, 2015. http://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Heidegger,Martin/textsonHeidegger/
DwanDavidHeideggerOnOntologyAndMassCommunication.pdf
Fog, Agner. The Supposed and the Real Role of Mass Media in Modern Democracy. 2004.
Accessed February 14, 2015. http://www.agner.org/cultsel/mediacrisis.pdf.
Habermas, Jurgen. Douglas Kellner. Accessed February 14, 2015.
http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/habermas.pdf.
Lorin G. Yochim Globalization as ‘Double Movement’ and the Transformation of Public
Education, 2006. Accessed February 14, 2015.
http://www.ualberta.ca/~lyochim/DocumentFiles/globalization.pdf.
Journal Articles
Dow, Kathleen. Art and the Symbolic Element of Truth: What Gadamer’s Method Conveys.
International Philosophical Quarterly 3, no. 2 (1996): 173-182.
Fairfield, Paul. Truth Without Methodologism: Gadamer and James. American Catholic
Philosophical Quarterly 67, no. 3 (1993): 285-297.
19
Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding the Cultural Viewpoints That Underlie Consumers'
Expressed Meanings.” Journal of Consumer Research Inc. 21 (December 1994): 432-
451.
Madison, Gary. “Coping with Nietzsche’s Legacy: Rorty, Derrida, Gadamer.” Philosophy Today
36, no. 1 (1992): 3-19.
McEvoy, James Gerard. Proclamation as Dialogue: Transition in the Church-World Relationship.
Theological Studies 70, no. 4 (December 2009): 875-903.
Pizer, John. “Aesthetic Consciousness and Aesthetic Non-Differentiation. Philosophy Today 33
(1989): 63-72.
Regan, Paul. “Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics: Concepts of Reading,
Understanding and Interpretation.” Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and
Practical Philosophy 4, no. 2 (December 2012): 286-303.
Schuchman, Paul. “Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer Hermeneutics.” Philosophy Today 23
(1979): 41-50.
Smith, Christopher, Gadamer’s Hermeneutic and Ordinary Language Philosophy. The Thomist 43
(1979): 296-321.
Thompson, Craig, Howard R. Pollio, William B. Locander. “The Spoken and the Unspoken: A
Wirth, Jason. The Role of Language in Object Transcendence. Philosophy Today 51, no. 4 (2007):
166-173.
Unpublished Source
Parris, David. Reception Theory: Philosophical Hermeneutics, Literary Theory, and Biblical
Interpretation. Nothingham, 1994. Accessed February 14, 2015.
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12110/.