KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
Kesimpulan Sesuai dengan hasil penelitian, dapat diambil beberapa kesimpulan sebagai
berikut:
1. Karakteristik individu berhubungan nyata dengan efektivitas komunikasi
terutama pada aspek afektif dan konatif. Pelatihan atau kursus yang diikuti
oleh responden menjadi faktor penentu dalam membangun komunikasi
yang efektif pada program PIDRA di kabupaten Sumbawa, Nusa Tenggara
Barat. Jenis kelamin, kepemilikan lahan dan pendapatan keluarga juga
memiliki hubungan nyata dengan efektivitas komunikasi.
2. Peran fasillitator atau pendamping berhubungan nyata dengan efektivitas
komunikasi terutama pada aspek konatif. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa
fasilitator atau pendamping berperan sebagai agen perubahan.
3. Partisipasi anggota dalam kelompok mandiri berhubungan nyata dengan
efektivitas komunikasi pada aspek kognitif, afektif dan konatif. Partisipasi
anggota dalam kelompok mandiri juga merupakan faktor penentu
efektivitas komunikasi. Hal ini menunjukkan ada perubahan perilaku yang
sejalan dengan program PIDRA antara lain kesetaraan gender, kemandirian
kelompok, kegiatan menabung, keterampilan bertani dan beternak,
mengelola usaha dan dana kelompok. Dengan kata lain, kelompok dan
anggotanya dapat memperoleh manfaat dari program PIDRA.
Saran
Saran yang diajukan adalah: agar program PIDRA dapat kontinu perlu
memperhatikan keberadaan Petugas Penyuluh Lapangan dan Lembaga Swadaya
Masyarakat serta sekaligus memperhatikan karakteristik individu dan partisipasi
dalam kelompok. Selain itu keterlibatan Pemerintah Daerah dalam pengalokasian
anggaran (APBD) perlu didorong untuk direalisasikan pada program mendatang.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Agung, S.R. 2001. Efektivitas Komunikasi Organisasi Pelaksana Program KUT [Tesis]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
BPS, BAPPEDA Kabupaten Sumbawa. 2004. Sumbawa dalam Angka.
Sumbawa: Badan Pusat Statistik dengan Bappeda Kabupaten Sumbawa. Cernea, MM. 1988. Mengutamakan Manusia di dalam Pembangunan Variabel-
variabel Sosiologi di dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan. Jakarta: UI Press. De Vito, J.A. 1997. Komunikasi Antar Manusia Kuliah Dasar. Edisi Kelima.
Jakarta: Professional Books. DFID. 2001. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Departemen
Pertanian. Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Blitar. 2004. Rencana Operasional Program PIDRA.
Blitar: PIDRA. Eaton, JW. 1986. Pembangunan Lembaga dan Pembangunan Nasional dari
Konsep ke Aplikasi. Jakarta: UI Press. Effendy, OU. 1984. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja
Rosdakarya. Jahi, A. 1988. Komunikasi Massa Dan Pembangunan Pedesaan di Negara–
negara Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Gramedia. Kerlinger, F. N. 2000. Azas-Azas Penelitian Behavioral. Ed. Ketiga. L. R.
Simatupang dan Koesmanto. HJ, Penerjemah. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press. Terjemahan dari: Fondation of Behavioral Research.
Koentjaraningrat. 1994. Kebudayaan Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: PT.
Gramedia. Lionberger, HF dan Gwin. 1982. Communication Strategies: A Guide for
Agricultural Change Agents. Columbia: University of Missouri. Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. 1988. Ketetapan-ketetapan
MPR RI. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit ALDA. Manjar, A. 2002. Efektivitas Komunikasi Perencanaan Partisipatif P3MD Pada
Lembaga Keamanan Masyarakat Desa (LKMD) di Kabupaten Bogor [Tesis]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
53
Mulyana, D. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nazir, M. 1988. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rakhmat, J. 2001. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Rejeki, S.N. 1998. Perencanaan Program Penyuluhan (Teori dan Praktek).
Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya. Ruseffendi, E.T. 1994. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non
Eksakta Lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Inovation. New York: The Free Press. Singarimbun, M dan Effendi, S. 1989. Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta:
LP3ES. Slamet, M. 2003. Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan. Bogor: IPB
Press. Suharto, E. 2005. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Masyarakat, Kajian
Strategis Pembangunan kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.
Tubbs, S.L dan Moss, S. 1996. Human Communication Prinsip-prinsip Dasar
Buku Pertama. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Vardiansyah, D. 2004. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: UI Press.
L A M P I R A N
Lampiran 1. Peta Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat
55
WEST NUSA TENGGARA Post-Crisis programme for Participatory Integrated Development in Rainfed Areas (PIDRA)
58
5756
Lampiran 2. Peta Wilayah Kabupaten Sumbawa
57
Lampiran 3. Distribusi Responden Pada Desa dan Kecamatan Lokasi Penelitian No Desa/Kecamatan Nama Kelompok Mandiri Tahun Jumlah
(Orang)1 Kukin/Moyo Utara KMP Maras Rembang 2004 18 KMW Lonto Engal 16 2 Pungkit Tede/Lape- KMW Anggrek Putih 2003 12 Lopok KMP Buin Tereng 19 KMP Teming Tinggi 1 KMW Mawar Merah 11 3 Tatebal/Ropang KMW Bina Bersama 2003 2 KMP Lete Batu 5 KMP Temang Damai 4 4 Lenangguar/Ropang KMP Tali Jangi 2003 2 KMW Saling Pendi 7 KMW Dea Tuan 5 KMP Riam Remo 7 J u m l a h 109 Keterangan: KMP = Kelompok Mandiri Pria KMW = Kelompok Mandiri Wanita
58
Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Case Processing Summary N %
Valid 20 100.0Excluded(a) 0 .0
Cases
Total 20 100.0a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.809 53 Item-Total Statistics
Pertanyaan Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item
Deleted Nomor6 106.3500 72.029 .441 .799 Nomor7 106.2500 78.618 -.057 .812 Nomor9 107.4500 78.682 -.065 .812 Nomor10 106.5000 79.842 -.382 .813 Nomor11 106.5500 78.366 .000 .809 Nomor12 107.1500 76.766 .153 .808 Nomor13a 106.5000 74.895 .363 .803 Nomor13b 106.6000 76.779 .207 .807 Nomor13c 106.6000 76.674 .223 .806 Nomor13d 106.8000 76.484 .217 .806 Nomor13e 106.6500 75.082 .311 .804 Nomor13f 106.6500 75.503 .343 .804 Nomor13g 106.5500 75.418 .270 .805 Nomor15 106.3000 76.642 .196 .807 Nomor17 106.7500 78.618 -.058 .814 Nomor18 106.6000 75.832 .206 .807 Nomor21 106.5500 76.261 .182 .807 Nomor23 105.9000 79.989 -.213 .816 Nomor24 106.2500 74.513 .447 .801
59
Item-Total Statistics
Pertanyaan Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item
Deleted Nomor25a 106.1500 77.292 .093 .809 Nomor25b 106.1000 75.253 .262 .805 Nomor25c 106.0500 76.050 .184 .807 Nomor25d 106.2000 75.221 .275 .805 Nomor25e 106.1500 79.818 -.190 .816 Nomor25f 106.1500 77.818 .018 .812 Nomor25g 106.2000 80.589 -.244 .819 Nomor25h 106.0500 76.997 .094 .810 Nomor25i 106.0500 74.471 .410 .801 Nomor26 105.6000 76.989 .338 .806 Nomor27 106.9000 71.042 .705 .792 Nomor28 106.7000 72.958 .505 .798 Nomor29 106.8500 75.713 .297 .804 Nomor30 106.9500 74.682 .395 .802 Nomor31 107.2000 75.642 .292 .805 Nomor32 106.5500 76.576 .197 .807 Nomor33 106.2000 78.589 -.055 .814 Nomor34 106.3000 77.274 .061 .811 Nomor35 106.6000 80.147 -.223 .817 Nomor36 106.9500 71.418 .788 .792 Nomor37 106.8000 71.958 .654 .794 Nomor38 106.8500 75.713 .297 .804 Nomor39 107.1000 73.253 .555 .798 Nomor40 107.0500 76.471 .182 .807 Nomor41 106.2500 74.197 .390 .802 Nomor41a 106.2000 75.116 .285 .804 Nomor42 106.3000 74.642 .360 .802 Nomor43 106.2000 74.379 .360 .802 Nomor44 106.2500 74.197 .390 .802 Nomor45 106.4500 68.576 .593 .791 Nomor46 106.5500 72.155 .413 .800 Nomor47 106.5500 76.155 .133 .810 Nomor48 106.6000 71.621 .480 .797 Nomor49 106.6000 72.884 .428 .800
r tabel df 51 = 0.1806.
60
Lampiran 5. Hasil Analisis Khi kuadrat untuk jenis kelamin
Kelamin * GenKog Crosstabulation
GenKog Total
.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Kelamin 1 Count 3 11 32 7 53 Expected Count 1.9 13.1 33.6 4.4 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 20.8% 60.4% 13.2% 100.0% % within GenKog 75.0% 40.7% 46.4% 77.8% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 10.1% 29.4% 6.4% 48.6% 2 Count 1 16 37 2 56 Expected Count 2.1 13.9 35.4 4.6 56.0 % within Kelamin 1.8% 28.6% 66.1% 3.6% 100.0% % within GenKog 25.0% 59.3% 53.6% 22.2% 51.4% % of Total .9% 14.7% 33.9% 1.8% 51.4%Total Count 4 27 69 9 109 Expected Count 4.0 27.0 69.0 9.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 3.7% 24.8% 63.3% 8.3% 100.0% % within GenKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 24.8% 63.3% 8.3% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .209 .173 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
61
Kelamin * MOKog Crosstabulation MOKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 4 9 38 2 53 Expected Count 1.9 6.3 41.3 3.4 53.0 % within Kelamin 7.5% 17.0% 71.7% 3.8% 100.0% % within MOKog 100.0% 69.2% 44.7% 28.6% 48.6% % of Total 3.7% 8.3% 34.9% 1.8% 48.6% 2 Count 0 4 47 5 56 Expected Count 2.1 6.7 43.7 3.6 56.0 % within Kelamin .0% 7.1% 83.9% 8.9% 100.0% % within MOKog .0% 30.8% 55.3% 71.4% 51.4% % of Total .0% 3.7% 43.1% 4.6% 51.4%Total Count 4 13 85 7 109 Expected Count 4.0 13.0 85.0 7.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 3.7% 11.9% 78.0% 6.4% 100.0% % within MOKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 11.9% 78.0% 6.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .263 .044 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
62
Kelamin * BukuKog Crosstabulation BukuKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 3 4 37 9 53 Expected Count 1.5 3.4 38.9 9.2 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 7.5% 69.8% 17.0% 100.0% % within BukuKog 100.0% 57.1% 46.3% 47.4% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 3.7% 33.9% 8.3% 48.6% 2 Count 0 3 43 10 56 Expected Count 1.5 3.6 41.1 9.8 56.0 % within Kelamin .0% 5.4% 76.8% 17.9% 100.0% % within BukuKog .0% 42.9% 53.8% 52.6% 51.4% % of Total .0% 2.8% 39.4% 9.2% 51.4%Total Count 3 7 80 19 109 Expected Count 3.0 7.0 80.0 19.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 2.8% 6.4% 73.4% 17.4% 100.0% % within BukuKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 2.8% 6.4% 73.4% 17.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .178 .312 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
63
Kelamin * KPPTKog Crosstabulation KPPTKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 9 17 25 2 53 Expected Count 7.8 19.4 24.8 1.0 53.0 % within Kelamin 17.0% 32.1% 47.2% 3.8% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 56.3% 42.5% 49.0% 100.0% 48.6% % of Total 8.3% 15.6% 22.9% 1.8% 48.6% 2 Count 7 23 26 0 56 Expected Count 8.2 20.6 26.2 1.0 56.0 % within Kelamin 12.5% 41.1% 46.4% .0% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 43.8% 57.5% 51.0% .0% 51.4% % of Total 6.4% 21.1% 23.9% .0% 51.4%Total Count 16 40 51 2 109 Expected Count 16.0 40.0 51.0 2.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 14.7% 36.7% 46.8% 1.8% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 14.7% 36.7% 46.8% 1.8% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .166 .378 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
64
Kelamin * UEKog Crosstabulation UEKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 8 20 24 1 53 Expected Count 7.3 26.7 18.5 .5 53.0 % within Kelamin 15.1% 37.7% 45.3% 1.9% 100.0% % within UEKog 53.3% 36.4% 63.2% 100.0% 48.6% % of Total 7.3% 18.3% 22.0% .9% 48.6% 2 Count 7 35 14 0 56 Expected Count 7.7 28.3 19.5 .5 56.0 % within Kelamin 12.5% 62.5% 25.0% .0% 100.0% % within UEKog 46.7% 63.6% 36.8% .0% 51.4% % of Total 6.4% 32.1% 12.8% .0% 51.4%Total Count 15 55 38 1 109 Expected Count 15.0 55.0 38.0 1.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 13.8% 50.5% 34.9% .9% 100.0% % within UEKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.8% 50.5% 34.9% .9% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .257 .052 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
65
Kelamin * GenAfe Crosstabulation GenAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 8 27 18 53 Expected Count 10.2 30.1 12.6 53.0 % within Kelamin 15.1% 50.9% 34.0% 100.0% % within GenAfe 38.1% 43.5% 69.2% 48.6% % of Total 7.3% 24.8% 16.5% 48.6% 2 Count 13 35 8 56 Expected Count 10.8 31.9 13.4 56.0 % within Kelamin 23.2% 62.5% 14.3% 100.0% % within GenAfe 61.9% 56.5% 30.8% 51.4% % of Total 11.9% 32.1% 7.3% 51.4% Total Count 21 62 26 109 Expected Count 21.0 62.0 26.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 19.3% 56.9% 23.9% 100.0% % within GenAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.3% 56.9% 23.9% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .228 .050 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
66
Kelamin * MOafe Crosstabulation MOafe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 3 33 17 53 Expected Count 2.4 33.1 17.5 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 62.3% 32.1% 100.0% % within MOafe 60.0% 48.5% 47.2% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 30.3% 15.6% 48.6% 2 Count 2 35 19 56 Expected Count 2.6 34.9 18.5 56.0 % within Kelamin 3.6% 62.5% 33.9% 100.0% % within MOafe 40.0% 51.5% 52.8% 51.4% % of Total 1.8% 32.1% 17.4% 51.4% Total Count 5 68 36 109 Expected Count 5.0 68.0 36.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 4.6% 62.4% 33.0% 100.0% % within MOafe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 4.6% 62.4% 33.0% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .051 .866 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
67
Kelamin * BukuAfe Crosstabulation BukuAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 3 26 24 53 Expected Count 1.9 29.7 21.4 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 49.1% 45.3% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 75.0% 42.6% 54.5% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 23.9% 22.0% 48.6% 2 Count 1 35 20 56 Expected Count 2.1 31.3 22.6 56.0 % within Kelamin 1.8% 62.5% 35.7% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 25.0% 57.4% 45.5% 51.4% % of Total .9% 32.1% 18.3% 51.4% Total Count 4 61 44 109 Expected Count 4.0 61.0 44.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 3.7% 56.0% 40.4% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 56.0% 40.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .153 .271 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
68
Kelamin * KPPTAfe Crosstabulation KPPTAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 3 25 25 53 Expected Count 1.9 30.6 20.4 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 47.2% 47.2% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 75.0% 39.7% 59.5% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 22.9% 22.9% 48.6% 2 Count 1 38 17 56 Expected Count 2.1 32.4 21.6 56.0 % within Kelamin 1.8% 67.9% 30.4% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 25.0% 60.3% 40.5% 51.4% % of Total .9% 34.9% 15.6% 51.4%Total Count 4 63 42 109 Expected Count 4.0 63.0 42.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 3.7% 57.8% 38.5% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 57.8% 38.5% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .212 .077 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
69
Kelamin * UEAfe Crosstabulation UEAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 3 30 20 53 Expected Count 1.9 34.0 17.0 53.0 % within Kelamin 5.7% 56.6% 37.7% 100.0% % within UEAfe 75.0% 42.9% 57.1% 48.6% % of Total 2.8% 27.5% 18.3% 48.6% 2 Count 1 40 15 56 Expected Count 2.1 36.0 18.0 56.0 % within Kelamin 1.8% 71.4% 26.8% 100.0% % within UEAfe 25.0% 57.1% 42.9% 51.4% % of Total .9% 36.7% 13.8% 51.4% Total Count 4 70 35 109 Expected Count 4.0 70.0 35.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 3.7% 64.2% 32.1% 100.0% % within UEAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 64.2% 32.1% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .165 .216 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
70
Kelamin * GenKona Crosstabulation GenKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 18 23 12 53 Expected Count 12.2 31.6 9.2 53.0 % within Kelamin 34.0% 43.4% 22.6% 100.0% % within GenKona 72.0% 35.4% 63.2% 48.6% % of Total 16.5% 21.1% 11.0% 48.6% 2 Count 42 7 56 7 Expected Count 12.8 33.4 9.8 56.0 % within Kelamin 12.5% 75.0% 12.5% 100.0% % within GenKona 28.0% 64.6% 36.8% 51.4% % of Total 6.4% 38.5% 6.4% 51.4% Total Count 25 65 19 109 Expected Count 25.0 65.0 19.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 22.9% 59.6% 17.4% 100.0% % within GenKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 22.9% 59.6% 17.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .311 .003 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
71
Kelamin * MOKona Crosstabulation MOKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 14 23 16 53 Expected Count 13.1 17.0 22.9 53.0 % within Kelamin 26.4% 43.4% 30.2% 100.0% % within MOKona 51.9% 65.7% 34.0% 48.6% % of Total 12.8% 21.1% 14.7% 48.6% 2 Count 13 12 31 56 Expected Count 13.9 18.0 24.1 56.0 % within Kelamin 23.2% 21.4% 55.4% 100.0% % within MOKona 48.1% 34.3% 66.0% 51.4% % of Total 11.9% 11.0% 28.4% 51.4% Total Count 27 35 47 109 Expected Count 27.0 35.0 47.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 24.8% 32.1% 43.1% 100.0% % within MOKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 24.8% 32.1% 43.1% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .265 .017 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
72
Kelamin * BukuKona Crosstabulation BukuKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 9 27 17 53 Expected Count 11.2 25.8 16.0 53.0 % within Kelamin 17.0% 50.9% 32.1% 100.0% % within BukuKona 39.1% 50.9% 51.5% 48.6% % of Total 8.3% 24.8% 15.6% 48.6% 2 Count 14 26 16 56 Expected Count 11.8 27.2 17.0 56.0 % within Kelamin 25.0% 46.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within BukuKona 60.9% 49.1% 48.5% 51.4% % of Total 12.8% 23.9% 14.7% 51.4% Total Count 23 53 33 109 Expected Count 23.0 53.0 33.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 21.1% 48.6% 30.3% 100.0% % within BukuKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.1% 48.6% 30.3% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .098 .590 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
73
Kelamin * KPPTKona Crosstabulation KPPTKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 19 26 8 53 Expected Count 17.0 27.2 8.8 53.0 % within Kelamin 35.8% 49.1% 15.1% 100.0% % within KPPTKona 54.3% 46.4% 44.4% 48.6% % of Total 17.4% 23.9% 7.3% 48.6% 2 Count 16 30 10 56 Expected Count 18.0 28.8 9.2 56.0 % within Kelamin 28.6% 53.6% 17.9% 100.0% % within KPPTKona 45.7% 53.6% 55.6% 51.4% % of Total 14.7% 27.5% 9.2% 51.4%Total Count 35 56 18 109 Expected Count 35.0 56.0 18.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 32.1% 51.4% 16.5% 100.0% % within KPPTKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 32.1% 51.4% 16.5% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .079 .711 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
74
Kelamin * UEKona Crosstabulation UEKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Kelamin 1 Count 17 28 8 53 Expected Count 21.4 27.7 3.9 53.0 % within Kelamin 32.1% 52.8% 15.1% 100.0% % within UEKona 38.6% 49.1% 100.0% 48.6% % of Total 15.6% 25.7% 7.3% 48.6% 2 Count 27 29 0 56 Expected Count 22.6 29.3 4.1 56.0 % within Kelamin 48.2% 51.8% .0% 100.0% % within UEKona 61.4% 50.9% .0% 51.4% % of Total 24.8% 26.6% .0% 51.4% Total Count 44 57 8 109 Expected Count 44.0 57.0 8.0 109.0 % within Kelamin 40.4% 52.3% 7.3% 100.0% % within UEKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 40.4% 52.3% 7.3% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .293 .006 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
75
Lampiran 6. Hasil Analisis Khi kuadrat untuk kepemilikan lahan Adalahan * GenKog Crosstabulation GenKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 4 5 0 10 Expected Count .4 2.5 6.3 .8 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 40.0% 50.0% .0% 100.0% % within GenKog 25.0% 14.8% 7.2% .0% 9.2% % of Total .9% 3.7% 4.6% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 3 23 64 9 99 Expected Count 3.6 24.5 62.7 8.2 99.0 % within Adalahan 3.0% 23.2% 64.6% 9.1% 100.0% % within GenKog 75.0% 85.2% 92.8% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 2.8% 21.1% 58.7% 8.3% 90.8%Total Count 4 27 69 9 109 Expected Count 4.0 27.0 69.0 9.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 3.7% 24.8% 63.3% 8.3% 100.0% % within GenKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 24.8% 63.3% 8.3% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .175 .327 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
76
Adalahan * MOKog Crosstabulation MOKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 2 2 6 0 10 Expected Count .4 1.2 7.8 .6 10.0 % within Adalahan 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% .0% 100.0% % within MOKog 50.0% 15.4% 7.1% .0% 9.2% % of Total 1.8% 1.8% 5.5% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 2 11 79 7 99 Expected Count 3.6 11.8 77.2 6.4 99.0 % within Adalahan 2.0% 11.1% 79.8% 7.1% 100.0% % within MOKog 50.0% 84.6% 92.9% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 1.8% 10.1% 72.5% 6.4% 90.8%Total Count 4 13 85 7 109 Expected Count 4.0 13.0 85.0 7.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 3.7% 11.9% 78.0% 6.4% 100.0% % within MOKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 11.9% 78.0% 6.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .287 .021 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
77
Adalahan * BukuKog Crosstabulation BukuKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 2 2 5 1 10 Expected Count .3 .6 7.3 1.7 10.0 % within Adalahan 20.0% 20.0% 50.0% 10.0% 100.0% % within BukuKog 66.7% 28.6% 6.3% 5.3% 9.2% % of Total 1.8% 1.8% 4.6% .9% 9.2% Ya Count 1 5 75 18 99 Expected Count 2.7 6.4 72.7 17.3 99.0 % within Adalahan 1.0% 5.1% 75.8% 18.2% 100.0% % within BukuKog 33.3% 71.4% 93.8% 94.7% 90.8% % of Total .9% 4.6% 68.8% 16.5% 90.8%Total Count 3 7 80 19 109 Expected Count 3.0 7.0 80.0 19.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 2.8% 6.4% 73.4% 17.4% 100.0% % within BukuKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 2.8% 6.4% 73.4% 17.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .360 .001 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
78
Adalahan * KPPTKog Crosstabulation KPPTKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 2 4 4 0 10 Expected Count 1.5 3.7 4.7 .2 10.0 % within Adalahan 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% .0% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 12.5% 10.0% 7.8% .0% 9.2% % of Total 1.8% 3.7% 3.7% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 14 36 47 2 99 Expected Count 14.5 36.3 46.3 1.8 99.0 % within Adalahan 14.1% 36.4% 47.5% 2.0% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 87.5% 90.0% 92.2% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 12.8% 33.0% 43.1% 1.8% 90.8%Total Count 16 40 51 2 109 Expected Count 16.0 40.0 51.0 2.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 14.7% 36.7% 46.8% 1.8% 100.0% % within KPPTKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 14.7% 36.7% 46.8% 1.8% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .071 .907 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
79
Adalahan * UEKog Crosstabulation UEKog .00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 4 5 0 10 Expected Count 1.4 5.0 3.5 .1 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 40.0% 50.0% .0% 100.0% % within UEKog 6.7% 7.3% 13.2% .0% 9.2% % of Total .9% 3.7% 4.6% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 14 51 33 1 99 Expected Count 13.6 50.0 34.5 .9 99.0 % within Adalahan 14.1% 51.5% 33.3% 1.0% 100.0% % within UEKog 93.3% 92.7% 86.8% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 12.8% 46.8% 30.3% .9% 90.8%Total Count 15 55 38 1 109 Expected Count 15.0 55.0 38.0 1.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 13.8% 50.5% 34.9% .9% 100.0% % within UEKog 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.8% 50.5% 34.9% .9% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .103 .759 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
80
Adalahan * GenAfe Crosstabulation GenAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 3 7 0 10 Expected Count 1.9 5.7 2.4 10.0 % within Adalahan 30.0% 70.0% .0% 100.0% % within GenAfe 14.3% 11.3% .0% 9.2% % of Total 2.8% 6.4% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 18 55 26 99 Expected Count 19.1 56.3 23.6 99.0 % within Adalahan 18.2% 55.6% 26.3% 100.0% % within GenAfe 85.7% 88.7% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 16.5% 50.5% 23.9% 90.8% Total Count 21 62 26 109 Expected Count 21.0 62.0 26.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 19.3% 56.9% 23.9% 100.0% % within GenAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.3% 56.9% 23.9% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .179 .164 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
81
Adalahan * MOafe Crosstabulation MOafe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 9 0 10 Expected Count .5 6.2 3.3 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 90.0% .0% 100.0% % within MOafe 20.0% 13.2% .0% 9.2% % of Total .9% 8.3% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 4 59 36 99 Expected Count 4.5 61.8 32.7 99.0 % within Adalahan 4.0% 59.6% 36.4% 100.0% % within MOafe 80.0% 86.8% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 3.7% 54.1% 33.0% 90.8% Total Count 5 68 36 109 Expected Count 5.0 68.0 36.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 4.6% 62.4% 33.0% 100.0% % within MOafe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 4.6% 62.4% 33.0% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .223 .058 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
82
Adalahan * BukuAfe Crosstabulation BukuAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 8 1 10 Expected Count .4 5.6 4.0 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 80.0% 10.0% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 25.0% 13.1% 2.3% 9.2% % of Total .9% 7.3% .9% 9.2% Ya Count 3 53 43 99 Expected Count 3.6 55.4 40.0 99.0 % within Adalahan 3.0% 53.5% 43.4% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 75.0% 86.9% 97.7% 90.8% % of Total 2.8% 48.6% 39.4% 90.8% Total Count 4 61 44 109 Expected Count 4.0 61.0 44.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 3.7% 56.0% 40.4% 100.0% % within BukuAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 56.0% 40.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .206 .088 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
83
Adalahan * KPPTAfe Crosstabulation KPPTAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 9 0 10 Expected Count .4 5.8 3.9 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 90.0% .0% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 25.0% 14.3% .0% 9.2% % of Total .9% 8.3% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 3 54 42 99 Expected Count 3.6 57.2 38.1 99.0 % within Adalahan 3.0% 54.5% 42.4% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 75.0% 85.7% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 2.8% 49.5% 38.5% 90.8% Total Count 4 63 42 109 Expected Count 4.0 63.0 42.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 3.7% 57.8% 38.5% 100.0% % within KPPTAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 57.8% 38.5% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .252 .024 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
84
Adalahan * UEAfe Crosstabulation UEAfe 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 1 8 1 10 Expected Count .4 6.4 3.2 10.0 % within Adalahan 10.0% 80.0% 10.0% 100.0% % within UEAfe 25.0% 11.4% 2.9% 9.2% % of Total .9% 7.3% .9% 9.2% Ya Count 3 62 34 99 Expected Count 3.6 63.6 31.8 99.0 % within Adalahan 3.0% 62.6% 34.3% 100.0% % within UEAfe 75.0% 88.6% 97.1% 90.8% % of Total 2.8% 56.9% 31.2% 90.8% Total Count 4 70 35 109 Expected Count 4.0 70.0 35.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 3.7% 64.2% 32.1% 100.0% % within UEAfe 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.7% 64.2% 32.1% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .172 .192 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
85
Adalahan * GenKona Crosstabulation GenKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 4 6 0 10 Expected Count 2.3 6.0 1.7 10.0 % within Adalahan 40.0% 60.0% .0% 100.0% % within GenKona 16.0% 9.2% .0% 9.2% % of Total 3.7% 5.5% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 21 59 19 99 Expected Count 22.7 59.0 17.3 99.0 % within Adalahan 21.2% 59.6% 19.2% 100.0% % within GenKona 84.0% 90.8% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 19.3% 54.1% 17.4% 90.8% Total Count 25 65 19 109 Expected Count 25.0 65.0 19.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 22.9% 59.6% 17.4% 100.0% % within GenKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 22.9% 59.6% 17.4% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .172 .190 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
86
Adalahan * MOKona Crosstabulation MOKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 2 6 2 10 Expected Count 2.5 3.2 4.3 10.0 % within Adalahan 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within MOKona 7.4% 17.1% 4.3% 9.2% % of Total 1.8% 5.5% 1.8% 9.2% Ya Count 25 29 45 99 Expected Count 24.5 31.8 42.7 99.0 % within Adalahan 25.3% 29.3% 45.5% 100.0% % within MOKona 92.6% 82.9% 95.7% 90.8% % of Total 22.9% 26.6% 41.3% 90.8% Total Count 27 35 47 109 Expected Count 27.0 35.0 47.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 24.8% 32.1% 43.1% 100.0% % within MOKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 24.8% 32.1% 43.1% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .191 .127 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
87
Adalahan * BukuKona Crosstabulation BukuKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 2 6 2 10 Expected Count 2.1 4.9 3.0 10.0 % within Adalahan 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within
BukuKona 8.7% 11.3% 6.1% 9.2%
% of Total 1.8% 5.5% 1.8% 9.2% Ya Count 21 47 31 99 Expected Count 20.9 48.1 30.0 99.0 % within Adalahan 21.2% 47.5% 31.3% 100.0% % within
BukuKona 91.3% 88.7% 93.9% 90.8%
% of Total 19.3% 43.1% 28.4% 90.8% Total Count 23 53 33 109 Expected Count 23.0 53.0 33.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 21.1% 48.6% 30.3% 100.0% % within
BukuKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.1% 48.6% 30.3% 100.0% Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .079 .711 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
88
Adalahan * KPPTKona Crosstabulation KPPTKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 3 7 0 10 Expected Count 3.2 5.1 1.7 10.0 % within Adalahan 30.0% 70.0% .0% 100.0% % within
KPPTKona 8.6% 12.5% .0% 9.2%
% of Total 2.8% 6.4% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 32 49 18 99 Expected Count 31.8 50.9 16.3 99.0 % within Adalahan 32.3% 49.5% 18.2% 100.0% % within
KPPTKona 91.4% 87.5% 100.0% 90.8%
% of Total 29.4% 45.0% 16.5% 90.8% Total Count 35 56 18 109 Expected Count 35.0 56.0 18.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 32.1% 51.4% 16.5% 100.0% % within
KPPTKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 32.1% 51.4% 16.5% 100.0% Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .152 .276 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
89
Adalahan * UEKona Crosstabulation
UEKona 1.00 2.00 3.00
Total
Adalahan Tidak Count 3 7 0 10 Expected Count 4.0 5.2 .7 10.0 % within Adalahan 30.0% 70.0% .0% 100.0% % within UEKona 6.8% 12.3% .0% 9.2% % of Total 2.8% 6.4% .0% 9.2% Ya Count 41 50 8 99 Expected Count 40.0 51.8 7.3 99.0 % within Adalahan 41.4% 50.5% 8.1% 100.0% % within UEKona 93.2% 87.7% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 37.6% 45.9% 7.3% 90.8%Total Count 44 57 8 109 Expected Count 44.0 57.0 8.0 109.0 % within Adalahan 40.4% 52.3% 7.3% 100.0% % within UEKona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 40.4% 52.3% 7.3% 100.0%
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .126 .415 N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Top Related