Cyber Defense in Depth: Designing Cyber Security Agency Organization for Turkey
What Does International Law Permit in Managing Cyber-Threats?
32
7636916 by Wayne Ramwell FILE T IME SUBMIT T ED 14-MAY-2015 03:58PM SUBMISSION ID 44858249 WORD COUNT 5716 CHARACT ER COUNT 49058 -SECURIT Y_ASSESSED_COURSEWORK-LAWS70462_ST UDENT _ID- 7636916.DOCX (181.99K)
Transcript of What Does International Law Permit in Managing Cyber-Threats?
7636916by Wayne Ramwell
FILE
TIME SUBMITTED 14-MAY-2015 03:58PM
SUBMISSION ID 44858249
WORD COUNT 5716
CHARACTER COUNT 49058
-SECURITY_ASSESSED_COURSEWORK-LAWS70462_STUDENT_ID-7636916.DOCX (181.99K)
FINAL GRADE
80/100
7636916GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor-The essay demonstrates a f irm understandingof the question coupled with depth of research. Itidentif ies the main themes and carries out anuanced analysis with contextualised examplesthat ref lect a f irm grasp of the legal and practicalaspects. Signif icantly, it identif ies and engagessome of the contested concepts andf rameworks. The essay def tly balancesdescription with analysis.-The essay has a clear f ocus with a well-developed analysis that makes use of wide-ranging primary and secondary academicliterature.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24
Comment 1no comment
PAGE 25
PAGE 26
PAGE 27
RUBRIC: UOM - LAW (PGT)
CONTENT
DISTINCTION(95)
DISTINCTION(90)
DISTINCTION(85)
DISTINCTION(80)
DISTINCTION(75)
MERIT 60-69%(69)
PASS 50-59%MA(59)
PASS 40-49%DIPL(49)
FAIL(39)
STRUCTURE
DISTINCTION(95)
DISTINCTION(90)
DISTINCTION(85)
DISTINCTION(80)
80 / 190
80 / 95
Is publishable in a high quality peer-reviewd academic journal without materialrevision.
Constitutes rare work of great insight; demonstrates substantial orginality inreasoning and interpretation; constains no major f laws at any level.
Applies the principles of the disciplinen to the issue(s) at hand in an original yetappropriate manner to produce a well reasoned analysis, with conclusions caref ullyand ef f ectively argued and supported; displays a deeper than normal expectedunderstanding of theoretial nuances, particularly in theior application; showsdiscernment in the use of germane literature base(s).
Demonstrates originality and deopth in thinking and application; demostrates acomprehensive f amiliarity with relevant theories, doctrines and cases; showsf amiliarity with germane literature base(s).
Shows breath of study and some originality in applications; shows externsiveknwoledge abd crit ical understanding of relevant theoriey, f actos and issues; isdirectly relevant to the issues to be addressed in the assignement.
Is suf f icient and relevant to issues beign disucssed; shows a good grasp ofrelevant theory, f acts and issues; ref lects a crit ical understanding of a broadrange of reading.
Is generally competent and displays an adequate understanding of the issues tobe addressed; is just suf f icient to cover the subject, but has some irrelevancies;shows a satisf actory grasp of relevant f acts and issues; shows adequate readingbut lit t le originality.
Does not f ully cover the subject specif ied and/or is sometimes irrelevant, shows aweak graso of relevant concepts, f acts and issues; suf f ers f rom inadequatereading and thinking.
Does not ref lect any background reading; shows only superf icial understanding (atbest) of the relevant issues; relies uncrit ically on subjective personal opinion orhearsay.
0 / 95
Is f lawless (with a not inf inite, but indef inite range of f lawlesness).
Has no structural weaknesses of great consequence.
Has no structural weaknesses of great consequence; integrates detail in acoherent whole; argues autonomously to a reasoned and logical conclusion; issupported throughout by appropriate and accurate language.
Has no structural weaknesses of great consequence; integrates detail into acoherent whole; argues autonomously to a reasoned and logical conclusion; is
DISTINCTION(75)
MERIT 60-69%(69)
PASS 50-59%MA(59)
PASS 40-49%DIPL(49)
FAIL(39)
supported throughout by appropriate and accurate language./
Has no structural weaknesses of great consequence; integrates detail into acoherent whole; argues autonomously to a reasoned and logical conclusion; israrely af f ected by inappropriate or inaccurate language.
Reveals an attempt to create a coherent whole; attempts to guide reader thorugha reasoned conclusion; is rarely af f ected by inappropriate or inaccurate language.
Links parts together but f alls short of creating a coherent whole; but does notalways guide the reader and does not always provide a conclusion to thearguments deployed; is weakened in places by inappropriate or inaccuratelanguage.
Sometimes f ails to link parts to each other; shows litt le regard f or the reader anddoes nto come to a justif iable conclusion; is weakened by inappropriate andinaccurate language.
No attempt made to argue to a conclusion; written in the f orm of an unstructuredmonologued or narrative; shows lit le respect f or the conventionsof grammar.
