2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………..…....…page 3 II. FORMALLY BRINGING FORWARD “FN-CHAPTER ONE” – The Flute Network data As offered in our PRC Testimony, September 2006………………………...…………………..page 3 III. AND NOW, “FN-CHAPTER TWO”………... …………………………………………………..page 5 A. NEWLY DEVELOPED BACKGROUND…………………………………………………. page 5

B. THE PARTICULARS - Relevant to Our 2007 Study, MTAC #114, a CD and

the overall sequence of events…………………………………………...………………page 6

C. NITTY GRITTY: New Particulars of Mail Prep, relevant to our 2007 Study………………page 7

D. 2007 FLUTE NETWORK FINDINGS…………………………………………………..…. page 9

1. Transit of Flute Network issues from entry into USPS system –

SCF San Bernardino, CA – to delivery in San Bernardino, CA………………...page 9

2. Our February and March 2007 Study…………………………………………...……page 9

a. Regarding the February 2007 Issue……………………………………..…..page 10

b. Regarding the March 2007 Issue…………………………………………....page 10

c. Notable exceptions for both issues…………………………………….……page 11

3. Method of Responses……………………………………………………….………page 12

E. INITIAL REFLECTIONS………………………………………………………….……….page 12

F. COMPARING ACROSS 2006 and 2007 Findings……………………………………..…..page 14

1. Regarding February Issues………………………………………………….……….page 14

2. Regarding March Issues……………………………………………………………..page 14

3. OUR OWN CONCLUSIONS – So Far………………...…………………….……..page 14

Appendices

1. Mailing panels of February and March issues……………………………………………………….page 17

2. Mailing forms from our March 2007 mailing –

3602…………………………………………………………………………………………….page 18 CASS …………………………………………………………………………………………. page 19 Qualification report…………………………………………………………………………….page 20 Tray tags………………………………………………………………………………………..page 25

3. The Flute Network Raw Data 2007 - with maps, and Service Standards overlay………………….page 31 4. Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2 - Chart of “Zip 924 to Three digit zip codes”,

(courtesy of Kurt Kramer, USPS) ……………………………………………………………..page 75 5. Covers from January - April 2007 issues of Flute Network, relevant to this study……………..… page 93

3I. INTRODUCTION During recent meetings of MTAC #114 in the winter and spring of 2007, several representatives from the

USPS as well as our group leaders have voiced a sincere interest in receiving data from “the industry”

regarding our respective experiences with USPS performance (i.e. postal “performance data”). The Flute

Network is a small non-profit Standard Mail A mailer – and we are honored to share the relevant data we

have garnered for our own purposes towards that effort (our data date from February 2004 to mid May

2007). In the interests of getting this material released sooner-rather-than-later, this particular report will

likely be far more informal in feel and tone than was our Testimony before the PRC last September 2006

(which dealt with similar content), but it will be no less thorough and accurate for it.

In light of the lessons from the fable of how the “three blind men describe an elephant” (i.e., one man,

feeling only the trunk describes it as being broadly tube-like, strong and wiggly like a fat snake; one man

feeling only the tail describes it as being skinny, hairy and limp like a rope; the last man feeling only the

side describes it as being broad and flat, high up, and wrinkled --- each one assuming that their experience

alone can be taken as descriptive of the whole animal…) – Flute Network data and experiences are hereby

being put forward in the hope that they will be combined with much more data and information stemming

from other perspectives, experiences, and view points -- and that by doing so we might collectively reach

understandings and find insights which would most certainly elude us otherwise. (Our signature editorial

tag line for Flute Network is this: “Always remember - no matter what, we really are all in this together!”-

and it most certainly holds true in this context as well…)

II. FORMALLY BRINGING FORWARD “FN-CHAPTER ONE” – The Flute Network data as

offered in our PRC Testimony, September 2006

In 2006, seeking to understand and find a way to work with our own frustrations around the actual mail

delivery of our print publication (as compared to what was put forward in the USPS standards of “3 – 10

days, nationwide”), The Flute Network asked our subscribers for help and initiated a pointed study -- we

asked our subscribers to let us know the date they received each of two specific issues (the February and

March 2006 issues) *and* the zip code where they received them. The data that came in validated our

perceptions at the time that delivery performance really was, literally, all over the map. It was some months

later that we learned that the data we had collected might be pertinent to concerns before the Postal Rate

Commission (now the Postal Regulatory Commission) in the R2006-1 Rate Case which they were actively

4considering. To cut to the chase, The Flute Network enlisted as an Intervenor and immediately went to

work to organize our collected data and experiences in the form of formal Testimony, and make it available

for use in their deliberations.

The Flute Network (and Janyce Pritchard [aka “Jan”]) eventually filed a number of documents with the PRC

in conjunction with that case, all of which are still available at the PRC website:

(1) Our Testimony (currently available online at http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53091/FLUTE-final.pdf --

submitted 9/5/2006);

(2) This was followed by a Reply to four Interrogatories from the USPS regarding questions they had

regarding parts of our Testimony (submitted 9/29/06 and available online at:

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53656/FluteReplytoInterog.pdf )

(3) We later filed an Initial Brief (which essentially is a sort of “Readers Digest” version of the most

pertinent parts of our more far-ranging original Testimony, along with a proffering of comments, insights,

and thoughts about how our offerings might fit within the larger picture of the collected positions which

other parties had put forward in their testimony, etc., with the PRC in this case…). Our Initial Brief is

available online at: http://www.prc.gov/docs/55/55518/arialFNinitialbrief.pdf [Please note: we originally

submitted our Initial Brief on 12/19/06 – we later learned that some folks had trouble reading it due to the

type style and formatting of that particular document – SO – on 12/29/06 we filed another version of that

document with no changes in it *other* than changing the font to Arial – which in turn did cause a bit of

pagination shift, but those are the only differences between the two documents. The version cited here is

that later [and hopefully more readable] version, which - due to having been filed during the Holidays -

technically turned into its having been filed and accepted as of 1/3/07).

OK – back to the point here…. our original Testimony for the PRC was written and submitted in September

of 2006 (i.e, recently), - and in it, we included detailed explanations about The Flute Network itself and our

publication, a history of our ongoing interests and concerns regarding USPS related matters (along with the

history of our efforts to sort these matters out), and also those parts of my own personal and professional

background which lent themselves to such an effort. While all of that certainly lends itself to the current

consideration as well, in the interests of time and space (as well as a respect for the reader who may well

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53091/FLUTE-final.pdf

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53656/FluteReplytoInterog.pdf%20%20)

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53656/FluteReplytoInterog.pdf%20%20)

http://www.prc.gov/docs/55/55518/arialFNinitialbrief.pdf

5have already seen it all before!), I will not be duplicating all that here – rather we will be building upon it

(hence, this document is very much a “Chapter Two” in purpose and mission, as well as by name!).1

Our original data from 2006, all of which was included in our Testimony in 2006, is again hereby

commended to our collective and current concern.2 (For those who may find it helpful, an MS-Word

version of that raw data is also available at the PRC site at: http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53091/EXHIBIT-V-

data.doc -- this was submitted to the PRC along with the PDF version which was included as Exhibit V in

our formal Testimony on 9/5/06). This data reflect the experience of the flow of Flute Network’s February

and March 2006 issues, as they originated from Waynesville, NC (28723) and moved basically from east to

west across the country. For our purposes now, let that body of data be considered “FN-Chapter One”.

II. AND NOW – “FN-CHAPTER TWO”….

A. NEWLY DEVELOPED BACKGROUND

Much to my surprise last fall (major understatement there), events conspired to the ultimate effect that Flute

Network did not cease publication after all. (…For a number of reasons, the USPS related delivery

frustrations being one, we had reasonably expected our May/June 2006 issue to be the last…) Instead,

based on what we learned from our subscribers in the wake of our 2006 study, combined with the discovery

of a new printer/mailer option - we did indeed work through the whiplash of doing a total about-face and

began publication again with that new printer/mailer, here in California in September of 2006. So far, we

have produced and mailed 8 issues of The Flute Network together, all of which are now being mailed out of

San Bernardino, CA (to be specific - SCF San Bernardino, CA 92403). Our ninth issue, the July/August

2007 issue, is currently in press.

The Flute Network continues to be the non-profit, entirely volunteer entity that we have been since we

began in 1984. Primarily a print publication, we now go out free of charge 9 times a year to some 6,100+

different flutists and flute teachers nationwide. Our sole mission continues – that is to serve as a bulletin-

1 However – if this document is the first you’ve heard of The Flute Network, it is likely you’d be interested in knowing about all that…. While that material is indeed readily available online, I will be happy to supply a copy of those sections, directly, for anyone who wishes it – please feel free to ask, and be sure to let me know how you’d like me to send it! My contact information is on the cover page of this report. 2 One minor correction – or bit of errata – in the original Testimony is probably worth putting in place here: in reference to the table of raw data included on page 29, for the math to be correct, line 10 on page 30 should read: [for] “8 [issues] – delivery took 18 – 34 days” to go between Waynesville NC and San Bernardino … not the 4 as currently listed there. The original data from which that table was derived was included on the page before. I apologize for that error going unnoticed until just recently.

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53091/EXHIBIT-V-data.doc

http://www.prc.gov/docs/53/53091/EXHIBIT-V-data.doc

6board service for flutists, flute teachers (AND the people who love them…), and to help people get word

about things as efficiently and economically for them as we possibly can. We do maintain a website

(www.flutenet.com), where most (but not all) of each print issue also appears during the time that each print

issue is the “current issue”. Also available on our website as a Flute Network service are listings of the

Masterclasses (worldwide), a continuously updated list of “Stolen and Lost Instruments”, and a few other

articles of a service nature. As regards our print issue mailings, we are maintaining our Non-Profit mailing

permit in Waynesville, NC (Permit #37), and are mailing with a “ghost permit” under Colour Concepts,

Incorporated mailing label (…we are “ghost number 81311” under CCI’s Non-Profit Permit No. 2968).

By December of 2006, it became apparent to us as we continued to advise our advertisers about how to plan

the best timing of their ad content, that the conclusions we had reached from our earlier study might – or

might not – be applicable to our new production process, especially now that basic direction of “mail flow”

had been changed. Our Board of Directors decided that we should investigate those questions again, and we

put in place plans to replicate our 2006 study with our February and March 2007 issues. Specifically,

questions of concern were: (1) is the flow of mailings any different from “west to east” than it was from

“east to west”, and if so, how?, and (2) most importantly - do we, and/or our advertisers, need to plan

differently, given the realities of mail flow from our newly revised mailing pattern?

B. THE PARTICULARS relevant to our 2007 Study, MTAC #114, a CD, and the overall sequence of

events

This year we were able to give our readers a “heads up” about our plans in the Greetings section of our

January 2007 issue and asked that they be on the look-out for their next two upcoming issues (…that

January 2007 issue went to press on December 10th, 2006).3 At the suggestion of an insightful friend, this

year we included a specialized “form” to make it easy for folks to note their zip code and the date it was

received, and pre-printed it on each mail piece where it would be easy for folks to use – this appeared on

each of the February and March 2007 issues, in the panel devoted to addresses and special messages.4

As in 2006, no one was promised - nor did anyone receive - anything in return for their participation in our

2007 investigation, other than the assurance that their help really mattered and was going to make a

3 Copies of the relevant Greetings sections from January, February, March, and April 2007 issues are included as an Appendix to this document. 4 Copies of the address-section of the February and March issues are included in the Appendices.

http://www.flutenet.com/

7difference (as it had, indeed, before!). As before – our subscribers demonstrated a sincere interest in being

of help, some going to great lengths to be sure we received their information. All information that was

received in connection with this 2007 study has been included in this report. Our first responder this year

replied with their information on January 27, 2007 – our last bit of data particular to these two issues was

received here on May 16th.

It was in early March of 2007 that I first learned of the MTAC #114 efforts, and was invited to participate

with the Standard Mail Subgroup. The March 14th meeting of that Subgroup was the first of those I

attended (via teleconference), and it was during the course of that day that I first learned of the CD which

was available from the USPS which outlined specific 3-digit zip to 3-digit zip code Service Standards

(…Now, the existence of such a thing as this was great news to me! – it sounded to be something far more

useful than the generalized “3 – 10 day” expectations for standard mails which was what we had been

working with thus far). I requested a copy of this CD and publicly offered – then and there - to perform

(and share!) an “overlay” of the data that Flute Network was then actively collecting [regarding delivery

performance of Flute Networks] with those refined and specific Service Standards as given on the CD.

The disk arrived here on April 5th, and we continued to collect our data, with plans to devote time to all of

this when we returned from an overseas trip, in early July.

During the May 5th MTAC - Standard Mail Subgroup meeting, however, it became apparent that a shift of

plans was being called for when it came to the MTAC cause – i.e., moving up our formal analysis of Flute

Network 2007 data to the soonest possible moment. The result is the document you are now reading. The

promised overlay of Flute Network 2007 data with the USPS 3-digit to 3-digit Service Standards from the

Fiscal Year 2007, Quarter 2 is reflected in its entirety in the Raw Data, and can be found Appended to this

document.5

C. NITTY GRITTY: New Particulars of Mail Prep, relevant to our 2007 study data

I continue to subscribe to Accuzip (a commercially available full service program for maintaining and

managing USPS related mailings), and maintain The Flute Networks mailing list personally. Address

corrections and changes of any necessary sort, any deletions and additions, etc. are made continuously –

5 Our sincerest THANKS go to Kurt Kramer who helped me not only to find the pertinent information on the CD, but also went to the trouble of pulling out the particular data we needed and sending it on to me in a form that we could more easily apply – all this very late one afternoon. His chart of the relevant USPS Service Standards from the 2007, Quarter 2 disk is included as part of this document.

8and the list for each issue is always verified through Accuzip programming before being we go to press with

each issue. However, given our new printer arrangements, I no longer print the labels and produce and

supply all the mailing forms for each issue, as we used to do when our production came out of North

Carolina… (slight correction to that: I do still produce those mailing documents with Accuzip, but they are

for our own record keeping and general use and not supplied to USPS with the mailings)6. Flute Networks

actual mailings and all those forms are now managed by Shannon Smith – Director of Mailing Services at

Colour Concepts, Inc..7 (CCI also prints our publication).

As the address list for each Flute Network issue is received at CCI Mailing Services, they manage it with

Firstlogic mailing software (also fully CASS and PAVE certified), run the Address Correction and

Encoding (ACE) to generate the CASS report, etc., do the Presort and produce all the related forms for the

mailing as a whole. After being printed, each individual Flute Network is folded into the 5 ½” by 8 ½ “ size

and tabbed in two places along the edge opposite the fold, inkjet addressed, and presorted for the trays as it

comes off the Kirk-Rudy Wave Jet and Kirk Rudy tabbing machine8, there in the CCI plant. The respective

trays are then assembled, sleeved and strapped, and put on a pallet. When complete, the whole pallet is

shrink wrapped, and the USPS paperwork (including the 3602, qualification report, and CASS certificate9)

are put with it, inside the shrink wrap so as to insure nothing gets lost. CCI trucks all their mailings to the

SCF Business Mail/Bulk Mail facility in San Bernardino, 92403, on at least a daily basis. A copy of the

3602 is also taken by the driver to be “round stamped” by the USPS and is returned to CCI for their files, so

that copies of it can also be made for any of the CCI mailers who wish them (…like us).

6 Although it is indeed a duplication of service, I continue to verify all addresses and run the CASS certification on the specific and updated list for each issue before sending each list to Shannon solely in order to better “chase” problem addresses, and to do all we can to keep our list on the highest of standards as far as USPS is concerned Also, we continue to subscribe to USPS Address Correction Services (we are #BYNMLCH), and we interface with that information using the ACS Module from Accuzip 7 Shannon Smith is also a part of the MTAC #114 – Standard Mail Subgroup, joining about the same time that I did. Just in the last year, alone, Shannon and CCI produced and mailed out pieces for some 500 companies – these mailings ranged in size from 200 pieces to some 400,000 pieces, and ran the gamut from being locally targeted to a nationwide blanketing. He and CCI have typically generated between $1.5 and $2 million in postage for the USPS on a monthly basis. 8 The Kirk-Rudy machine mechanically spaces out the respective bundles and trays as it processes the Presort – and the specific tray number for each individual Flute Network piece is also printed in the endorsement line of each address. 9 Copies of these forms, specific to the mailing of our March 2007 issue, are included with this report.

9

D. 2007 FLUTE NETWORK FINDINGS

1. Transit of Flute Network Issues From Entry into the USPS System – SCF San Bernardino, CA – to

Delivery in San Bernardino, CA

Over the course of the eight issues we have produced and mailed so far, the dates of mailing and receipt of

each issue at two local San Bernardino addresses were as follows:

Issue Date rec’d by USPS Date rec’d at street Date rec’d at Days in - SCF 924-- address: 92407 PO Box in 92427 transit _______ ______________ _______________ ________________ ______ Sept/Oct ‘06 09/22/06 10/02/06 10/02/06 10/10 Nov ’06 10/23/06 10/26/06 10/25/06 3/2 Dec ’06 11/22/06 11/27/06 11/27/06 5/5 Jan ’07 12/18/06 12/22/06 12/22/06 4/4 Feb ’07 01/24/07 01/29/07 01/30/06 5/6 March ’07 02/20/07 02/28/07 02/28/07 8/8 April ’07 03/21/07 03/26/07 03/26/07 5/5 May/June ’07 04/23/07 …not yet rec’d 05/02/07 x/9 To be clear – the above chart reflects mailings from 3-digit zip of 924 to two addresses in 3-digit zip code

924 – the Service Standards as they currently stand indicate delivery can be expected in 3 days.

2. Our February and March 2007 Study All of the raw data that came in regarding receipt of both issues are included with this document and are

charted out by date and zip code, along with maps of the USA depicting those zip codes relative to the

originating SCF San Bernardino, CA post office. As promised during the MTAC #114 Standard Mail

Subgroup meeting in March 2007, the “overlay” of our data with the USPS Service Standards is provided in

those charts as well – the number next to each zip which is enclosed in parentheses is the number of days

10given in the existing USPS Service Standards for delivery - to – specific 3-digit zip codes - from - the

originating 924 zip code (source: the CD of Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2).

a. Regarding the February 2007 Issue

The February 2007 issue was received at SCF San Bernardino on January 24, 2007. We heard from 259

folks about the receipt of their February issue.

By USPS Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2 data - none of them arrived “early”.

Two (2) were received “within” the established Service Standards, specifically:

- zip code 90260, was received Day 3, a Saturday, from mailing at 924 – the standard gives 4 days

- zip 27403, was received Day 9, a Friday, from 924 – the standard gives 10 days.

One issue could be considered to have been “close” in its arrival time - (i.e., delivered one day later than

expected according to the Service Standards):

- zip code 90065 was delivered on Day 5, and the standards say 4 days for that zip.

The remaining 256 issues that we heard about were delivered between 2 and 43 days beyond the number of

days identified on the USPS Service Standard CD.

From the point of view of the current Service Standards, and taken in bulk, only 25 issues – nationwide -

were reported as being delivered within the initial 10 day span after mailing; 111 were delivered on and

between Days 12 and 17; 60 delivered on and between Days 19 and 24 (there was a huge snow storm

effecting NY and PA on our Day 19 – it’s unknown just how that effected potential for USPS delivery in

those areas, but is certainly worth noting); 37 were delivered on and between Day 27 and 31; and 24 were

delivered on and between Day 33 and 52.

b. Regarding The March 2007 Issue

The March 2007 issue was received at SCF San Bernardino Post Office on February 20th, 2007. We heard

from 333 folks about receipt of their March issues.

By USPS Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2 data - none of them arrived “early”.

Two (2) were reported as received within the established Service Standards:

11– zip codes 90260 and 90403, both, were received on Day 4 (a Saturday), and the standards say 4

days for those two zips.

Four (4) could be considered to be in the “close” category:

– zip codes 10023, 27215, 11733, and 34116 were all received on Day 11 (a Saturday), and the

Service Standards for all of those zips is 10 days.

The remaining 327 were reported as being delivered between 2 and 56 days beyond the number of days

expected according to the Service Standards.

From the point of view of the current Service Standards, and taken in bulk, 26 folks – nationwide - reported

receiving their issues on and within the initial 10 day span after mailing; 195 received theirs on and between

Day 11 and 17; 85 were received on and between Days 18 and 24; 17 were received on and between Day 25

and 31; and 9 were received on and between day 32 and 65.

c. Notable Exceptions Among the Data Received for Both Issues

i. On March 20th, 2007 - Day 55 of our February issue delivery - we heard from zip code 32506 that she

never got her February issue at all, but that she received March on March 6th (the March data is included

with the other March issue data; that February issue which was reported as “never received”, however, was

not included in our raw data count… [we choose to think it just might show up for her, even yet]…).

ii. Zip code 70505 reported receiving her March issue before her February issue – March issue was

received on March 6th (Day 14, a Tuesday) and her February issue on March 8th (Day 43, a Thursday).

Service Standards for zip 924 to 705 is nine (9) days. These data are reflected in their respective February

and March counts.

iii. Zip code 70814 reported receiving her February and March issues both on the same day – March 17th, a

Saturday (this represents days 52 and 25 respectively; the Service Standards give 924 to 708 as nine (9)

days.)

iv. On April 11, 2007 – Day 50 of our March issue delivery – we heard from 75156 that he never got his

March issue, but received his April issue on April 7th (the April issues entered the mail stream on March 21st

– so that would be Day 16; Service Standards give 924 to 751 as being eight (8) days.) That his March issue

12was never received is noted here, but as with the missing February issue above, was not included in the raw

data count.

v. Three other people contacted us about receipt of their February and March issues, but their information

was not sufficiently specific to allow us to responsibly code them. Efforts to contact these folks for more

specifics were not successful, consequently we did not include their data in this report – however their

efforts and interest in participating are hereby gratefully acknowledged.

3. Method of Responses

All together, 592 responses to our requests for information were volunteered to us. Of that number, 151

were sent to us via USPS mail (cards and notes, and most often the whole address panel was sent along as

well; sometimes too, just the completed “form” that we’d provided for notation purposes was sent in); 8

people placed phone calls to us with the requested information; and 433 submitted their data via emails.

E. INITIAL REFLECTIONS from 2007 FLUTE NETWORK DATA

All the raw data is included as an Appendix to this document. We gratefully acknowledge Google Maps for

their website services which provided us an opportunity to graphically represent the relative position of

receiving zip codes relative to SCF San Bernardino (CA) post office which was the entry point for all Flute

Network issues. One map of city/state/zip code data was constructed for each day that we had information

about Flute Networks being received. In the Raw Data Charts, the number in parentheses positioned next to

each zip code is the number of days the Service Standards (2007, Quarter 2) gives for the respective “origin

924 to receiving 3-digit zip code”. By comparing maps across time, then, it is possible to get a feel for the

“flow” of Flute Networks as they traversed the USPS system across the country over time..

We have not yet begun to plumb the depth and range of what might be gleaned from the 2007 Data,

however two trends of importance (to us) did pop out, almost immediately, while doing the charting.

First - it is clear that, in our case, trays tagged for SCF 924 were not (consistently) being pulled from the

pallet before being sent to the BMC in Los Angeles. (I understand that Shannon will be actively pursuing

this issue with our local USPS SCF office – he suspects that this could explain some of the frustration

experienced by other of his customers, too, whose large mailings have been taking 10-plus days for local

13delivery ...seemingly without reason, until now - but always with serious consequences for those particular

companies.) Nothing is known, here, also, about how pallets and trays are actually managed or handled after

leaving the BMC in Los Angeles to move across the country as well – if similar inconsistencies in handling

are happening down the line, that could contribute to some of the delays (relative to the Service Standards)

evidenced in the data.

Second – that local delivery can vary widely once a “batch” reaches its “local” area post office for delivery

to its destination is evident in the data as well. Taking Los Angeles as a case in point (all of these zip codes

are geographically close (relatively speaking), and in the Service Standards for 4 day delivery from a 924

origin) – but were delivered with wide variation in time:

February issue was received in:

Lawndale, CA 90260 – on Day 3

Los Angeles, CA 90065 – Day 5

Northridge, CA 91324 – Day 9

San Pedro, CA 90731 – Day 9

Glendale, CA 91205 – Day 10


West Hollywood, CA 90046 – Day 30

March issue was received in:

Lawndale, CA 90260 – on Day 4

Santa Monica, CA 90403 – Day 4


Diamond Bar, CA 91765 – Day 9

San Pedro, CA 90731 – Day 10


South Pasadena, CA 91031 – Day 14

Sylmar, CA 91342 – Day 15

West Lake Village, CA 91362 – Day 15

If – as is widely suspected10 - Standard Mail moves only in an “as there’s room for it” basis - or

alternatively - “only when there’s enough of it to be worth dealing with”, then that could account for some

of these time differences – and it makes a mailers’ ability to reliably predict delivery next to impossible. I

have no knowledge of any of the specifics about the range of delivery times in these cases (it really is rather

striking!) – however, it is reasonable to suspect that LA is not unique in having such a varied profile in

local deliveries of Standard Mail (especially nonprofit Standard Mails).

10 This “suspicion” was widely cited by most of the companies who talked with us as we conducted our 2006 Study, and has recently been reiterated to me again just in the last week by the owner of a large local Real Estate company and the Superintendent of a local public school system as being why they no longer use the bulk mail system, when they otherwise would. The CEO of a large non-profit professional organization also has put this “understanding” forward to it’s membership in their May 2007 newsletter, in a paragraph acknowledging and responding to the significant number of complaints that they’d received from the membership about their not having received organization publications which had been mailed to them some time ago. (Copy available upon request.)

14F. COMPARING ACROSS 2006 and 2007 FINDINGS 1. Regarding February Issues In 2006 we heard from 228 respondents; in 2007 we heard from 259 folks.

In 2006, the flow of our mailings moved from “east to west”; the bulk of recipients received their issues on

and between 12 – 19 days from date of mailing.

In 2007, the flow of our mailings moved from “west to east”; the bulk of our recipients reported receiving

their issues on and between 12 – 24 days from date of mailing (171 people)..

2. Regarding March issues

In 2006, we heard from 307 respondents; in 2007 we heard from 333 folks.

In 2006, the flow of our mailings moved from “east to west”; the bulk of recipients reported receiving their

issues on and between 32 – 41 days from date of mailing.

In 2007, the flow of our mailings moved from “west to east”; the bulk of our recipients (208 people)

reported receiving their issues on and between days 13 – 24 --- a significant improvement from 200611,

and more in line with the experience of our two February issues as noted above.

3. OUR OWN CONCLUSIONS – SO FAR

In light of what we learned in 2006, when it became clear that we would indeed be going back into

production, we adjusted our deadlines and press times up by a week (i.e., to the 10th of the month prior to

the next months issue- for example, January 10th was the deadline for our February 2007 issue, February

10th the deadline for the March issue, and so on) thus allowing a “cushion” of 4 – 5 weeks for delivery time

to our nationwide subscriber base via USPS. Our hopes in doing this were that more people might then be

receiving their issues within the month that appeared in the banner heading of each issue… and our data

from 2007 investigation appear to show that this hope has generally been realized. We continue to hope that

this time allowance might be realistically (and reliably!) reduced; indeed, we would prefer it so.

11 Why this change???? …heaven only knows!….. (Several theories have been proffered, so far, from folks we’ve talked with about this, but in the absence of further good information, those are mostly of a nature best shared in a far less formal setting than this document, and perhaps – better yet - discussed over a glass of good wine!)

15At this point, given all that has come to light in the meantime regarding USPS processes and the demands

being made of it, we at The Flute Network continue to be totally respectful of – and honestly, rather

somewhat in awe of – how the USPS manages to deliver our mailings at all (and sooner or later, for the

most part) to all those gazillions of addresses around the country. (One thing that really became obvious

while working with Google Maps in this effort: there sure are a mind-blowing number of little-bitty roads

now, in even more little towns that weren’t even there last year – all of which have specific addresses and

are scattered all around this country – far more than one might casually imagine!. No doubt the task of

managing the mails has only become more complex and complicated over time as a result.12) It is not

unusual, then, to think that the “realities” of current mailer experiences have also, then, likely far out-paced

the established expectations and understandings about mail delivery times… However, what has not changed

is the over-arching need for USPS *and* its customers to be as “in synch” as possible about these matters.

As a case in point, knowing from our 2006 Study that in “reality”, it’s taking up to 5 or more weeks for

Flute Networks to be received by many (if not most) of our subscribers, we chose to adjust accordingly

(…not that we’re totally thrilled about it, but at least we know better, now, just what the “realities” are that

we are dealing with, instead of trying so hard to hold to a belief in what amounted to – at best, “out of touch

information” – as given in the USPS Standards of “3 – 10 days, nationwide”). Essentially, then, we are a

case in point as to how the ability to plan better for receipt of ones mailings can make all the difference in

the world (…well, that – and being graced with all the understanding and supportive subscribers, who so

generously invested themselves in these investigative efforts, as well!).

The larger questions remain however. USPS customers (ourselves included) need – and deserve – to

know better how to predict the timing of their mailings, and this can only come with accurate information

about mail flow, for all mail classes, over time. The current MTAC #114 efforts towards those ends represent

real potential for realization of that hope - in that we indeed are a diverse and widely inclusive party – and

we are, indeed, (1) actively comparing notes about this “elephant” – or at least what we each know of it, and

(2) looking at ways the USPS itself might better assess its own performance, possibly reconsider how it does

its work, and make adjustments if-and-as needed in order to actually accomplish *that which they believe

they can do* towards meeting our mutually desired ends. Technological advances in scanning and tracking

technology offer tremendous potential for individual mailers as well as the USPS to better assess these matters

12 Just this past weekend, there were reports in the newspapers, on CNN and MSNBC about the assignment of a unique zip code for a shoe store to be opened this summer on the eighth floor of the Saks Fifth Avenue flag-ship store in New York City: 10022-SHOE. …Now, I doubt we will be adding them to our mailing list, but the fact of it is testament to the very kind of fine complexity I’m referring to!

16as we move into the future. For now, however, (to the best of my knowledge) we have only what

currently exists as the ground upon which any such efforts for the future must find traction. That there is,

currently, still some discrepancy between mailer and mailing expectations and experience is perhaps still an

understatement (i.e., there are perhaps far more than three versions of this this “elephant” -- versions that have

yet to see the "light of day" by virtue of being shared - it is good that there is room, yet, in our considerations

for all of *them* as well!).

IN SHORT: Our collective efforts most certainly stand the best chance of bringing the best results for ALL

of us if our work can be inclusive and based in as much “reality” as we can (a) get our hands on, and

(b) get our minds around. It is hoped that the raw data related to The Flute Networks experience with

Standard Mail A non-profit delivery, from both 2006 and 2007, may assist in our collective effort. Appendices: 1. The address panels for the February and March 2007 issues. 2. Mailing forms from our March 2007 mailing – CASS, 3602, qualification report, tray tags 3. The Flute Network Raw Data 2007 - with maps, and Service Standards overlay 4. From the Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2 - a chart of 924 to other 3-digit zip codes 5. Page One of the January through April 2007 issues of The Flute Network..

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| CODING ACCURACY SUPPORT SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT |

| CASS PS FORM 3553 |

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | A1. CASS |

| |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | CASS Certified Company Name Configuration |

| | Business Objects Americas STD |

| | CASS Certified Software Name & Version |

| | ACE 7.70.01.K |

| | Z4Change Certified Company Name Configuration |

| | N/A |

| | Z4Change Software Name & Version |

| S | |

| O | eLOT Certified Company Name Configuration |

| F | Business Objects Americas STD |

| T | eLOT Software Name & Version |

| W | ACE 7.70.01.K |

| A |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| R | A2. MASS |

| E |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | MASS Certified Company Name |

| | |

| | MASS Certified Software Name & Version |

| | |

| | Configuration MLOCR Serial Number |

| | |

|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | B1. LIST PROCESSOR | B2. DATE LIST PROCESSED | B3. DATE OF DATABASE |

| | | | |

| L | | MASTER FILE: 14-Feb-2007 | ZIP+4 FILE: 12/2006 |

| I | | Z4CHANGE: | Z4CHANGE: |

| S | | eLOT: 14-Feb-2007 | eLOT: 12/2006 |

| T | | CRIS: | CRIS: |

| |------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|

| | B4. ADDRESS LIST NAME | B5. NUMBER OF LISTS | B6. TOTAL ADDRESSES |

| | 01023_ace.TXT | 1 | 6060 |

|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | | | VALIDATION PERIOD |

| O | CASS OUTPUT RATING | TOTAL CODED | FROM TO |

| U |-------------------------------|--------------|---------------------------|

| T | C1. RECORDS ZIP+4 CODED | 6060 | 02/14/2007 | 08/13/2007 |

| P | C2. RECORDS Z4CHANGE PROCESSED| 0 | XXXXXXXXXX | XXXXXXXXXX |

| U | C3. RECORDS DPBC CODED | 6060 | 02/14/2007 | 08/13/2007 |

| T | C4. RECORDS 5-DIGIT CODED | 6060 | 02/14/2007 | 02/14/2008 |

| | C5. RECORDS CR RT CODED | 6060 | 02/14/2007 | 05/15/2007 |

| | C6. RECORDS eLOT ASSIGNED | 6060 | 02/14/2007 | 05/15/2007 |

|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | D1. SIGNATURE OF MAILER | D2. DATE SIGNED |

| | | |

| M | | |

| A | ----------------------------------| |

| I | I certify that the mailing |--------------------------------------|

| L | submitted with this form has been | D3. NAME & ADDRESS OF MAILER |

| E | ZIP+4 coded (as indicated above) | Postmaster Mailing |

| R | using CASS certified software | 700 Columbia Ave |

| | meeting all requirements of | Riverside CA 92507 |

| | Domestic Mail Manual A950. | |

|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| | For Informational Purposes Only: QSS is solely made available for the |

| | list processor's review and analysis. This information is not to be |

| | considered by the Postal Service personnel in determining rate |

| Q | eligibility under any circumstances. |

| S |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| S | High Rise | High Rise | Rural Route | Rural Route | Locatable Address |

| | Default | Exact | Default | Exact | Conversion System |

| | | | | | (LACS/LACSLink) |

| |-----------|-----------|-------------|-------------|----------------------|

| | 146 | 404 | 5 | 8 | 38 |

| |-----------|-----------|-------------|------------------------------------|

| | EWS | DPV | RDI | |

| | | | | |

| |-----------|-----------|-------------| |

| | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Business Objects Americas (54601-4071) Form 3553, March 2005

19

USPS Qualification Report

Postalsoft (R) Presort 7.70 [c05] Page 1

Mailer Name: A Little Wizard Enterprise Mail Id: 0001 Date: 2/20/06

14-Feb-2007 02:39:05pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entry Point: (1) SCF SN BERNARDINO CA, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92403-9997

Presort: (1) STD, Automation Letters ATM (DMM 245.7)

Tray Tray Tray Pc/Ver Running

Tray# Size Lvl Zip Group Dest ID WS HD CR CB 5B 3B AB MB 3/5 BS Totals

------ --- ----- ----- ---------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------

1 2-U 3DGS 923 923 All 14 14

924 All 3 17

925 All 18 35

2 2-U 3DG 922 All 11 46

3 2 MAAD 901 A006 All 2 48

A010 All 32 80

A015 All 42 122

A018 All 37 159

4 2 MAAD 901 A018 All 12 171

A021 All 91 262

A023 All 10 272

5 2 MAAD 901 A023 All 10 282

A028 All 35 317

A030 All 38 355

A040 All 30 385

6 2 MAAD 901 A040 All 13 398

A050 All 39 437

A060 All 33 470

A064 All 29 499

7 2 MAAD 901 A064 All 25 524

A068 All 26 550

A07099 All 38 588

A076 All 24 612

8 2 MAAD 901 A076 All 7 619

A077 All 12 631

A079 All 28 659

A080 All 48 707

A085 All 19 726

9 2 MAAD 901 A085 All 3 729

A088 All 15 744

A00309 All 6 750

A100 All 89 839

10 2 MAAD 901 A100 All 25 864

A105 All 47 911

A112 All 25 936

A110 All 17 953

11 2 MAAD 901 A110 All 7 960

A115 All 18 978

A117 All 39 1017

A120 All 26 1043

A125 All 23 1066

12 2 MAAD 901 A125 All 2 1068

A130 All 40 1108

A140 All 25 1133

A144 All 47 1180

13 2 MAAD 901 A144 All 5 1185

A150 All 71 1256

A170 All 29 1285

A173 All 8 1293

14 2 MAAD 901 A173 All 14 1307

A180 All 30 1337

A189 All 53 1390

A190 All 17 1407

15 2 MAAD 901 A190 All 57 1464

A197 All 18 1482

A200 All 14 1496

A202 All 1 1497

A201 All 23 1520

16 2 MAAD 901 A201 All 10 1530

A207 All 23 1553

A208 All 37 1590

A210 All 42 1632

A212 All 2 1634

17 2 MAAD 901 A212 All 42 1676

A217 All 13 1689

A220 All 54 1743

A230 All 4 1747

18 2 MAAD 901 A230 All 44 1791

A233 All 30 1821

A240 All 24 1845

A250 All 16 1861

19 2 MAAD 901 A250 All 8 1869

A270 All 34 1903

A275 All 62 1965

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Page Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1919 0 0

20




14-Feb-2007 02:39:05pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





------ --- ----- ----- ---------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------

A280 All 9 1974

20 2 MAAD 901 A280 All 73 2047

A283 All 14 2061

A290 All 24 2085

A294 All 3 2088

21 2 MAAD 901 A294 All 22 2110

A296 All 31 2141

A300 All 60 2201

22 2 MAAD 901 A300 All 1 2202

A303 All 61 2263

A306 All 17 2280

A308 All 9 2289

A310 All 14 2303

A320 All 12 2315

23 2 MAAD 901 A320 All 62 2377

A325 All 8 2385

A327 All 26 2411

A328 All 17 2428

24 2 MAAD 901 A328 All 20 2448

A330 All 17 2465

A331 All 26 2491

A333 All 10 2501

A334 All 31 2532

A335 All 10 2542

25 2 MAAD 901 A335 All 57 2599

A339 All 17 2616

A350 All 39 2655

26 2 MAAD 901 A350 All 1 2656

A360 All 10 2666

A365 All 7 2673

A370 All 36 2709

A373 All 29 2738

A377 All 26 2764

A380 All 5 2769

27 2 MAAD 901 A380 All 20 2789

A390 All 13 2802

A400 All 27 2829

A403 All 20 2849

A430 All 33 2882

28 2 MAAD 901 A430 All 4 2886

A434 All 16 2902

A440 All 52 2954

A442 All 33 2987

A450 All 9 2996

29 2 MAAD 901 A450 All 24 3020

A453 All 21 3041

A460 All 68 3109

30 2 MAAD 901 A460 All 8 3117

A462 All 30 3147

A480 All 51 3198

A481 All 25 3223

31 2 MAAD 901 A481 All 18 3241

A488 All 52 3293

A493 All 43 3336

32 2 MAAD 901 A493 All 23 3359

A500 All 29 3388

A522 All 52 3440

A530 All 10 3450

33 2 MAAD 901 A530 All 54 3504

A535 All 37 3541

A541 All 16 3557

A550 All 6 3563

34 2 MAAD 901 A550 All 60 3623

A553 All 54 3677

35 2 MAAD 901 A553 All 6 3683

A570 All 16 3699

A580 All 16 3715

A590 All 42 3757

A600 All 33 3790

36 2 MAAD 901 A600 All 44 3834

A601 All 49 3883

A604 All 19 3902

A605 All 2 3904

37 2 MAAD 901 A605 All 30 3934

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Page Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1969 0 0

21




14-Feb-2007 02:39:05pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





------ --- ----- ----- ---------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------

A606 All 59 3993

A617 All 24 4017

38 2 MAAD 901 A617 All 15 4032

A630 All 65 4097

A640 All 34 4131

39 2 MAAD 901 A640 All 58 4189

A670 All 32 4221

A680 All 23 4244

40 2 MAAD 901 A680 All 18 4262

A700 All 9 4271

A707 All 17 4288

A710 All 12 4300

A720 All 26 4326

A730 All 23 4349

A740 All 9 4358

41 2 MAAD 901 A740 All 3 4361

A750 All 39 4400

A752 All 19 4419

A757 All 10 4429

A760 All 41 4470

A770 All 1 4471

42 2 MAAD 901 A770 All 30 4501

A773 All 55 4556

A780 All 27 4583

A783 All 2 4585

43 2 MAAD 901 A783 All 9 4594

A786 All 48 4642

A793 All 20 4662

A798 All 10 4672

A800 All 26 4698

44 2 MAAD 901 A800 All 114 4812

45 2 MAAD 901 A800 All 1 4813

A808 All 29 4842

A820 All 14 4856

A836 All 23 4879

A840 All 31 4910

A852 All 15 4925

46 2 MAAD 901 A852 All 45 4970

A856 All 31 5001

A870 All 33 5034

A890 All 5 5039

47 2 MAAD 901 A890 All 16 5055

A894 All 10 5065

A900 All 34 5099

A902 All 36 5135

A907 All 17 5152

48 2 MAAD 901 A907 All 21 5173

A910 All 57 5230

A913 All 36 5266

49 2 MAAD 901 A913 All 12 5278

A917 All 18 5296

A920 All 67 5363

A926 All 16 5379

50 2 MAAD 901 A926 All 22 5401

A930 All 24 5425

A940 All 68 5493

51 2 MAAD 901 A940 All 58 5551

A945 All 55 5606

52 2 MAAD 901 A945 All 30 5636

A950 All 53 5689

A956 All 31 5720

53 2 MAAD 901 A956 All 23 5743

A962 All 1 5744

A967 All 22 5766

A970 All 67 5833

54 2 MAAD 901 A970 All 35 5868

A980 All 79 5947

55 2 MAAD 901 A980 All 36 5983

A983 All 34 6017

A990 All 29 6046

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Page Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2112 0 0

22




14-Feb-2007 02:39:05pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





------ --- ----- ----- ---------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------

A995 All 14 6060

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Mailing Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 6014 0 0

Mailing Rate Summary Pieces

---------------------------------------- -----------

Automation ADC (AB) 46

Mixed Automation ADC (MB) 6014

-----------

TOTAL Automation 6060

Grand Total Pieces: 6060

23




14-Feb-2007 02:39:05pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Destination Rate Summary Pieces

Dest WS HD CR CB 5B 3B AB MB 3/5 BS Totals

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

DDU 0

DSCF 0

DBMC 0

NONE 46 6014 6060

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 6014 0 0 6060

24

SN BERNARDINO CA 923 STD LTR BC SCHEME

—øº¡Ç“˜1111 9230054301 SAN BERNARDINO CA

Ctn No 1 Pkgs 2 Pcs 35

SN BERNARDINO CA 922 STD LTR 3D BC

—ø°¡È“˜1111 9220054401 SAN BERNARDINO CA


MXD LOS ANGELES CA 901 STD LTR BC WKG

—ö¦¡Ê“˜1111 9010054601 SAN BERNARDINO CA























25































26































27































28































29
















30

2007 Flute Network – Raw Data REGARDING the FEBRUARY 2007 ISSUE All February issues of Flute Network entered the mails on January 24, 2007, at SCF San Bernardino, CA. Day 1 for this mailing, then, and for our considerations is considered to be January 25. The blue pins are indicators of where Flute Network issues were reported as received on that day, by zip code. In a few of the maps, a green arrow indicates location of origination post office. In the list of the zip codes each day, the number in parenthesis next to it reflects the number of days given for delivery in that 3-digit zip code from 924 in the USPS Service Standards, 2007, Quarter 2. ** indicates receipt on or within the current Service Standard NOTE: due to the close proximity of zip codes on some days, and the small scale of the maps, there may be more zip codes in the list than pins on the maps – they’re just hiding behind each other in some places.

********************************** Feb issue received – Saturday, Jan. 27 (Day 3)

Lawndale, CA 90260 (4)** - this is the first report of receipt of this issue. (Green arrow represents 92403 – origin post office: SCF San Bernardino ____________________________________________________________

31

Feb issue received – Monday, Jan. 29 (Day 5)

San Bernardino, CA 92407 (3) Loma Linda, CA 92354 (3) Murrieta, CA 92563 (3) Los Angeles, CA 90065 (4) ______________________________________________________________________

32

Feb issue rec’d – Tuesday, Jan. 30 (Day 6)

San Bernardino, CA 92427 (3) _____________________________________________________________________ Feb issue rec’d – Friday Feb. 2 (Day 9)

Lakewood, CO 80226 (7)

Sedona, AZ 86351 (5)

Prescott, AZ 86301 (5)

Northridge, CA 91324 (4)

San Pedro, California 90731 (4)

Reseda, California 91335 (4)

Mesa, AZ 85215 (5)

Greensboro, NC 27403 (10)**

_________________________________________________________________________________

33

Feb issue rec’d – Saturday Feb. 3 (Day 10)

Bellingham, WA 98225 (7)

Coos Bay, OR 97420 (7)

Arvada, CO 80003 (7)

Boulder, CO 80303 (7)

Denver, CO 80231 (7)

Spokane, WA 99208 (7)

Glendale, CA 91205 (4)

Eugene, OR 97401 (7)

Cornelius, OR 97113 (7)

Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (4)

Bremerton, WA 98310 (7)

___________________________________________________________________

34

Feb issue rec’d – Monday Feb. 5 (Day 12)

Spokane, WA 99258 (7) La Jolla, CA 92037 (4) Prescott, AZ 86302 (5) Dubuque, IA 52002 (9) Tacoma, WA 98418 (7) Portland, OR 97225 (7) Colorado Springs, CO 80906 (7) Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 (9) Denver, CO 80230 (7) Colorado Springs, CO 80909 (7) Bothell, WA 98021 (7) Lakewood, WA 98499 (7) Davenport, IA 52803 (9) Waterloo, IA 50701 (9) Branford, CT 06405 (10) ________________________________________________________________________________

35

Feb issue rec’d – Tuesday Feb. 6 (Day 13)

Atlanta, GA 30328 (10)

Smyrna, GA 30080 (10)

Wilmington, Delaware 19807 (10)

Roanoke, VA 24018 (10)

Coralville, IA 52241 (9)

Smyrna, GA 30082 (10)

Goleta, CA 93117 (5)

Sweet Briar, Virginia 24595 (10)

Logan, UT 84341 (6)

Oceanside, CA 92057 (4)

Cumming, GA 30041 (10)


Rochester, MI 48309 (10)

Clifton, CO 81520 (6)

Dresher, PA 19025 (10)

Yonkers, NY 10701 (10)

Rochester, Michigan 48306 (10)

Albuquerque, NM 87110 (7)

Moline, IL 61265 (9)

____________________________________________________________________________________

36

Feb. issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb. 7 (Day 14)

Morrisville, Pennsylvania 19067 (10)

Weirton, WV 26062 (10)

Oakland, CA 94609 (6)

Bronxville, NY 10708 (10)

Richmond, CA 94804 (6)

Grand Rapids, MI 49504 (9)

Richmond, CA -B 94804 (6)

Meadville, PA 16335 (10)

Salt Lake City, Utah 84121 (6)

Tenafly, NJ 07670 (10)

Oakland, California 94611 (6)

Jacksonville, FL 32259 (10)

Northville, MI 48167 (10)

Lebanon, IN 46052 (9)

Rye Brook, New York 10573 (10)

New York, NY 10025 (10)

Snellville, GA 30078 (10)

Dayton, OH 45429 (10)

Tuolumne, CA 95379 (6)

San Diego, CA 92117 (4)

Yerington, NV 89447 (6)

San Ramon, California 94618 (6)


Bayside, New York 11360 (10)

Sanford, NC 27332 (10)

Conyers, GA 30094 (10)

Atherton, CA 94027 (6)

Ann Arbor, MI 48103 (10)

San Ramon, CA 94583 (6)

___________________________________

37

Feb issue rec’d - Feb 7th or 8th (Day 14 or 15)

Antioch, TN 37013 (9)

(Green arrow – origination post office, San Bernardino)

________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Thursday, Feb. 8 (Day 15)

Ridgewood, New York 11385 (10)

San Francisco, CA 94114 (6)

New York, NY 10024 (10)


Jamison, PA 18929 (10)

Queens Village, NY 11428 (10)

Modesto, CA 95350 (6)

Fresno, CA 93728 (5)

Sandy Hook, CT 06482 (10)

Alpharetta, GA 30004 (10)

Brooklyn, NY 11205 (10)

Pleasant Hill, TN 38578 (9)

Niles, MI 49120 (9)

________________________________________

38

Feb issue rec’d – Friday Feb. 9 (Day 16)

Bethel, MN 55005 (9)

Missoula, MT 59808 (7)

Bozeman, MT 59718 (7)

Davis, CA 95616 (6)

Lubbock, TX 79413 (7)

Boothbay, ME 04537 (10)

Venice, FL 34293 (10)

Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 (10)

Filion, MI 48432 (10)

Forestville, MI 48434 (10)

Paterson, NJ 07502 (10)

Westfield, NJ 07090 (10)

Plymouth, MI 48170 (10)

Dawsonville, GA 30534 (10)

New York, NY 10023 (10)

Saint Petersburg, FL 33704 (10)

Roxbury, VT 05669 (10)


Salem, CT 06420 (10)

___________________________________

39

Feb issue rec’d – Feb 9th or 10th (Day 16 or 17)

East Setauket, NY 11733 (10)

_________________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Saturday Feb 10th (Day 17)

Bristol, RI 02809 (10)

Indianapolis, IN 46260 (9)

Springfield, VT 05156 (10)

Marquette, MI 49855 (9)

Nashville, TN 37205 (9)

Polson, MT 59860 (7)

Danville, VT 05828 (10)

McDonough, GA 30253 (10)

Raleigh, NC 27614 (10)

Fair Lawn, NJ 07410 (10)

Pine Beach, NJ 08741 (10)

Burlington, VT 05401 (10)


Rutherford, NJ 07070 (10)

__________________________________

40

Feb issue rec’d – Monday Feb. 12 (Day 19)

Appleton, WI 54915 (9)

Lancaster, PA 17601 (10)

Pittsburgh, PA 15221 (10)

Gettysburg, PA 17325 (10)

Millersville, PA 17551 (10)

Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (10)

___________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Tuesday Feb. 13 (Day 20)

Hickory, NC 28601 (10)

York, PA 17403 (10)

Milwaukee, WI 53219 (9)

San Rafael, CA 94903 (6)

Jupiter, FL 33478 (10)

Manlius, NY 13104 (10)

Trenton, NJ 08619 (10)

Syracuse, New York 13214 (10)

Woolrich, PA 17779 (10)

Bethpage, NY 11714 (10)

Lewisburg, PA 17837 (10)

Inverness, CA 94937 (6)

Orlando, FL 32804 (10)

Charlotte, NC 28211 (10)


Peoria, IL 61614 (9)

__________________________

41

Feb issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb. 14 (Day 21)

Linwood, NJ 08221 (10)

Laredo, TX 78045 (8)

New Market, TN 37820 (10)

Greeneville, TN 37745 (10)

Northport, AL 35473 (9)

Richmond, VA 23226 (10)

Winter Park, FL 32789 (10)

Ames, IA 50010 (8)

Rochester, NY 14620 (10)

Bloomington, IN 47401 (9)


Spencerport, NY 14559 (10)

Chugiak, AK 99567 (10)

Apopka, FL 32703 (10)

Pella, IA 50219 (8)

___________________________________________________________________________

42

Feb issue rec’d – Thursday Feb. 15 (Day 22)

Brookfield, WI 53045 (9)

Vincentown, New Jersey 08088 (10)

Lexington, KY 40522 (10)

Easton, PA 18042 (10)

Marlton, New Jersey 08053 (10)

Sheboygan, WI 53083 (9)

Madison, WI 53716 (9)

Orefield, PA 18069 (10)

_________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Friday Feb 16 (Day 23)

Morris, MN 56267 (8)

Lake Villa, IL 60046 (9)

Virginia Beach, VA 23464 (10)

Chesterfield, VA 23832 (10)

New Albany, PA 18833 (10)

Waco, TX 76708 (10)

43

________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Friday or Saturday, Feb 16 or 17 (Day 23 or 24)

Cambridge, MA 02140 (10)

Somerville, MA 02145 (10)

___________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Saturday Feb 17 (Day 24)

Modena, NY 12548 (10)

New York, NY 10011 (10)

Milford, NJ 08848 (10)

Columbus, OH 43201 (10)

Morris Plains, NJ 07950 (10)

Gwynn Oak, MD 21207 (10)

Newton, NJ 07860 (10)

__________________________________________________________________________

44

Monday Feb 19 – Presidents Day

__________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Tuesday Feb 20 (Day 27)

Bedford, TX 76021 (8)

Rhinebeck, NY 12572 (10)

Medford, MA 02155 (10)

Cincinnati, OH 45243 (10)

Denton, Texas 76210 (8)

Greenville, SC 29617 (10)


San Marcos, TX 78666 (8)

Signal Mountain, TN 37377 (10)

Philadelphia, PA 19123 (10)

New Paltz, NY 12561 (10)

___________________________________________________________________________

45

Feb issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb 21 (Day 28)

New Paltz, NY 12561 (10)

Somers, CT 06071 (10)

Palmyra, VA 22963 (10)


Glenwood, MD 21738 (10)

Arlington, TX 76011 (8)

Austin, TX 78750 (8)

Evergreen Park, IL 60805 (9)

Silver Spring, MD 20901 (10) ________________________

______________________________________________________________________________ Feb issue rec’d – Thursday Feb 22 (Day 29)

Columbia, MD 21044 (10) ___________________________________________________________________________________

46

Feb issue rec’d – Friday Feb 23 (Day 30)

Davidson, NC 28035 (10)

Lincoln, NE 68522 (8)

West Hollywood, CA 90046 (4)

Moore, SC 29369 (10)

Reading, MA 01867 (10)


Corvalis, OR 97330 (7)

Bladensburg, MD 20710 (10)

Rockville, MD 20853 (10)

Lynnfield, MA 01940 (10)

(Green arrow – origination PO)

__________________________________________________________________________________ Feb issue rec’d – Saturday Feb 24 (Day 31)

Naperville, IL 60563 (9)

Naperville, IL 60563 – B (9)

Omaha, NE 68112 (8)

Omaha, NE 68104 (8)


San Antonio, TX 78247 (8)

_________________________________________________________________________________

47

Feb rec’d – Monday Feb 26 (Day 33)

Wichita, KS 67220 (8)

Edmond, OK 73013 (8)



Iola, KS 66749 (8)

Greenville, IL 62246 (9)

New York, NY 10024 (10)

Maryville, MO 64468 (8)

____________________________________________________________________________

Feb rec’d – Tuesday Feb 27 (Day 34)

Topeka, KS 66610 (8)


Olathe, KS 66061 (8)

Magnolia, TX 77355 (8)

________________________________________________________________________________

48

Feb issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb 28 (Day 35)

Omaha, NE 68106 (8)

Wood Dale, IL 60191 (9)

_____________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Thursday March 1 (Day 36)

Carol Stream, IL 60188 (9)

Machesney Park, IL 61115 (9)

Houston, TX 77080 (8)

Saint Louis, MO 63131 (9)

________________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Friday March 2 (Day 37)

Slidell, LA 70461 (9)

Chicago, IL 60615 (9)

Hammond, LA 70403 (9)

_____________________________

49

Feb issue rec’d – Tuesday March 6 (Day 41)


________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Wednesday March 7 (Day 42)

Mabank, TX 75156 (8)

______________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d – Thursday March 8 (Day 43)

Lafayette, LA 70505 (9)

_______________________________________________________________________________

Feb issue rec’d- Saturday March 17 (Day 52)

Baton Rouge, LA 70814 (9)

_______________________________________________________________________________

End of February 2007 Data

50

REGARDING the MARCH 2007 ISSUE

All March issues of Flute Network entered the mails at SCF San Bernardino on February 20, 2007.

**********************************

March issue rec’d – Saturday Feb 24 (Day 4)

Lawndale, CA 90260 (4)

Santa Monica, CA 90403 (4)

(Green arrow is origin post office, SCF San Bernardino)

________________________________________________________________________________

51

March issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb 28 (Day 8)

San Bernardino, CA 92407 (3)

San Bernardino, CA 92427 (3)




Mesa, AZ 85205 (5)

Flagstaff, AZ 86004 (6)

Mesa, AZ 85215 (5)

___________________________________________________________________________________

52

March issue rec’d – Wednesday Feb 28 or Thursday March 1 (Day 8 or 9)

La Jolla, CA 92037 (4)

(Green arrow is origin post office, SCF San Bernardino)

_________________________________________________________________________________

March issue rec’d – March 1 (Day 9)



Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (4)

Loma Linda, CA 92354 (3)



Sedona, AZ 86351 (5)

_________________________________________________________________________________

53

March issue rec’d – Friday March 2 (Day 10)

Sacramento, CA 95818 (6)

Laguna Woods, CA 92637 (4)

Santa Barbera, CA 93120 (5)

Santa Barbara, CA 93105 (5)

Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (4)

Las Vegas, NV 89144 (5)

Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 (7)

San Pedro, CA 90731 (4)

____________________________________________________________________________________

March issue rec’d – Saturday March 3 (Day 11)

Boulder, CO 80303 (7)


New York, NY 10023 (10)

Davis, CA 95616 (6)

Colorado Springs, CO 80906 (7)

Colorado Springs, CO 80909 (7)

Littleton, CO 80120 (7)

East Setauket, NY 11733 (10)

Burlington, NC 27215 (10)

Naples, FL 34116 (10)

54

____________________________________________________________________________________

March issue rec’d – Monday March 5 (Day 13)

Winston-Salem, NC 27104 (10)

Antioch, TN 37013 (9)


Denver, CO 80230 (7)

Fort Myers, FL 33967 (10)

New Market, TN 37820 (10)

Venice, FL 34293 (10)


Richmond, CA 94804 (6)


Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082 (10)

Land O Lakes, FL 34638 (10)

Clifton, CO 81520 (6)

Sarasota, FL 34233 (10)

Palm Harbor, FL 34684 (10)

Nashville, TN 37205 (9)

Tucson, AZ 85719 (6)

Irmo, SC 29063 (10)


Marietta, GA 30062 (10)

Waterloo, IA 50701 (9)

Columbia, SC 29223 (10)

Sioux Falls, SD 57108 (8)

Littleton, NC 27850 (10)

________________________________________________________________________________

55

March issue rec’d – Tuesday March 6 (Day 14)


San Jose, CA 95118 (6)

Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (10)

Sandpoint, ID 83864 (7)

Sweet Briar, VA 24595 (10)

Cullman, AL 35057 (9)

Lubbock, TX 79413 (7)

Polson, MT 59860 (7)

Powell, OH 43065 (10)


Berkeley, CA 94703 (6)

Woodinville, WA 98072 (7)

Winter Park, FL 32789 (10)

Boise, ID 83709 (7)

Lexington, MA 02421 (10)

Saratoga, CA 95070 (6)

Huntsville, AL 35804 (9)

Tulsa, OK 74132 (8)

Hixson, TN 37343 (10)

Chattanooga, TN 37404 (10)

Arlington, MA 02474 (10)

Pensacola, FL 32503 (9)

Lafayette, LA 70505 (9)

Greenville, IL 62246 (9)

Tacoma, WA 98418 (7)

Seattle, WA 98122 (7)

Marion, IA 52302 (9)

West Lafayette, IN 47906 (9)


South Pasadena, CA 91031 (4)

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 (6)

San Ramon, CA 94583 (6)


Fremont, CA 94538 (6)

Conyers, GA 30094 (10)

Pleasant Hill, TN 38578 (9)

Olympia, WA 98502 (7)

Wichita, KS 67220 (8)

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 –B (6)


______________________________________________________________________________

56

March issue rec’d – Tuesday or Wednesday March 6th or 7th (Day 14 or 15)

Ridgewood, NY 11385 (10)

(Green arrow is origin post office – SCF San Bernardino, CA)

_______________________________________________________________________________

57

March issue rec’d – Wednesday March 7 (Day 15)

Missoula, MT 59808 (7)

Woolrich, PA 17779 (10)

Orlando, FL 32825 (10)

West Palm Beach, FL 33411 (10)

Philipsburg, PA 16866 (10)

Helena, MT 59601 (7)

Leesport, PA 19533 (10)

Portland, OR 97219 (7)

Bothell, WA 98021 (7)

Salem, VA 24153 (10)

Greeneville, TN 37745 (10)

Dresher, PA 19025 (10)




Roanoke, VA 24018 (10)

Boonville, IN 47601 (9)



McDonough, GA 30253 (10)

Wilmington, DE 19807 (10)

Jacksonville, FL 32259 (10)

San Francisco, CA 94127 (6)

Coos Bay, OR 97420 (7)


Morris Plains, NJ 07950 (10)


Wood Dale, IL 60191 (9)

Morrisville, PA 19067 (10)

Philadelphia, PA 19123 (10)

Jackson, TN 38305 (9)

Mountain City, TN 37683 (10)

West New York, NJ 07093 (10)

Apopka, FL 32703 (10)

Myrtle Point, OR 97458 (7)

Sylmar, CA 91342 (4)

Saint Petersburg, FL 33704 (10)

Palo Alto, CA 94306 (6)


Sandpoint, ID 83864 (7)

Cincinnati, OH 45243 (10)

Hackettstown, NJ 07840 (10)

Newton, NJ 07860 (10)

State College, PA 16803 (10)

Westlake Village, CA 91362 (4)

Chattanooga, TN 37403 (10)

West Linn, OR 97068 (7)

Smyrna, GA 30082 (10)

Calistoga, CA 94515 (6)

San Mateo, CA 94402 (6)

Westfield, NJ 07090 (10)

Bellingham, WA 98225 (7)

Fresno, CA 93728 (5)

Snellville, GA 30078 (10)

Tulsa, OK 74137 (8)


Laredo, TX 78045 (8)

Lexington, MA 02421 (10)

__________________________

58

DETAILS FROM MARCH 7 RECEIPTS:

59

ANOTHER DETAIL FROM MARCH 7 RECEIPTS:

(Green arrow is origin post office – SCF San Bernardino)

_______________________________________________________________________________

60

March issue rec’d – Thursday March 8 (Day 16)

Millersville, PA 17551 (10)

Davison, MI 48423 (10)

Rutherford, NJ 07070 (10)

Coraopolis, PA 15108 (10)


Smyrna, GA 30080 (10)

Gwynedd, PA 19436 (10)

Northville, MI 48167 (10)

Boothbay, ME 04537 (10)

Fairmont, WV 26554 (10)

Stockton, CA 95207 (6)

Ames, IA 50010 (8)

Yerington, NV 89447 (6)

Bronxville, NY 10708 (10)

Colchester, CT 06415 (10)


New York, NY 10024 (10)

Dawsonville, GA 30534 (10)

Hampton, NH 03842 (10)

Oskaloosa, IA 52577 (8)


Ashland, OR 97520 (7)

Midland, MI 48642 (10)

New Haven, CT 06510 (10)


Forestville, MI 48434 (10)

Filion, MI 48432 (10)


Ann Arbor, MI 48103 (10)

Hampton, NH 03842 (10)

Woodinville, WA 98072 (7)

Canyon Lake, TX 78133 (8)

Santa Clara, CA 95050 (6)


North Tonawanda, NY 14120

(10)

Dallas, TX 75218 (8)

Branford, CT 06405 (10)

_________________________

DETAIL OF MARCH 8 – North east quarter – follows

61

Another detail of March 8 delivery of March issue -

_______________________________________________________________________________

March issue delivery – Thursday or Friday March 8 or 9 (Day 16 or 17)


Tenafly, NJ 07670 (10)

_____________________________________________________________________________

62


Rhinebeck, NY 12572 (10)


Port Chester, NY 10573 (10)

Somers, CT 06071 (10)

Pontiac, MI 48341 (10)

Stratford, CT 06614 (10)

De Pere, WI 54115 (9)


Milford, NJ 08848 (10)

Rochester, NY 14620 (10)

Davis, CA 95616 (6)

Schenectady, NY 12302 (10)

Manlius, NY 13104 (10)

Marlton, NJ 08053 (10)

Salisbury, NH 03268 (10)


Pine Beach, NJ 08741 (10)

Magnolia, TX 77355 (8)

Hicksville, NY 11801 (10)

Cornelius, OR 97113 (7)

Buffalo, NY 14221 (10)


Orefield, PA 18069 (10)

_______________________

Detail of March 9 receipts:

______________________________________________________________________________________

63


De Witt, NY 13214 (10)

Spring, TX 77380 (8)

Trenton, NJ 08619 (10)

Brodheadsville, PA 18322 (10)


Bayport, NY 11705 (10)



Laurel Springs, NJ 08021 (10)

Marquette, MI 49855 (9)

Weymouth, MA 02188 (10)

Queens Village, NY 11428 (10)

York, PA 17403 (10)

Boston, MA 02116 (10)

Omaha, NE 68104 (8)


Detail March 10 receipts:

____________________________________________________________________________________

64


Cleveland, OH 44120 (10)

Iola, KS 66749 (8)

Bowling Green, OH 43402 (10)

Arcadia, MI 49613 (10)

Berea, OH 44017 (10)

Annville, PA 17003 (10)

West Olive, MI 49460 (9)


Minneapolis, MN 55422 (9)

Scranton, PA 18510 (10)

Hornell, NY 14843 (10)

Lake Dallas, TX 75065 (8)

Jackson, MS 39202 (9)


Memphis, TN 38120 (9)

Lakeland, FL 33803 (10)

Cleveland, OH 44118 (10)

Topeka, KS 66604 (8)

Minneapolis, MN 55410 (9)


Bethel, MN 55005 (9)

Traverse City, MI 49686 (10)

Linwood, NJ 08221 (10)

________________________________________________________________________________

65


Kingston, IL 60145 (9)

Brandon, MS 39047 (9)

Grand Rapids, MI 49504 (9)


Marshall, WI 53559 (9)

San Marcos, TX 78666 (8)

Lake in the Hills, IL 60156 (9)

Northampton, MA 01060 (10)

Olathe, KS 66061 (8)

Burlington, NJ 08016 (10)

Fairfax, CA 94930 (6)


Bethpage, NY 11714 (10)

Lynnfield, MA 01940 (10)

Honolulu, HI 96817 (10)

Groton, MA 01450 (10)

Anchorage, AK 99509 (10)

Salem, MA 01970 (10)

Roxbury, VT 05669 (10)

Anchorage, AK 99504 (10)

__________________________________________________________________________________

66

March issue rec’d – Wednesday March 14 (Day 22)

Madison, WI 53705 (9)

Washington, DC 20003 (10)

Lee, MA 01238 (10)

Chugiak, AK 99567 (10)

Paterson, NJ 07502 (10)

Springfield, VT 05156 (10)

Stockton, CA 95207 (6)

Sharon, MA 02067 (10)

Madison, WI 53705 –B (9)

Richardson, TX 75081 (8)

________________________________________________________________________________

67


Naperville, IL 60563 (9)

Slidell, LA 70461 (9)

Glenwood, MD 21738 (10)

Platteville, WI 53818 (9)

Lisle, IL 60532 (9)

Marshfield, MA 02050 (10)

Danville, VT 05828 (10)

Bloomfield, NJ 07003 (10)

Niles, MI 49120 (9)

_______________________________________________________________________________


Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221 (10)

La Grange, IL 60525 (9)

New York, NY 10025 (10)

Evergreen Park, IL 60805 (9)

Palatine, IL 60074 (9)

Chicago, IL 60615 (9)

Niles, IL 60714 (9)

_________________________________________________________________________________

68


Baton Rouge, LA 70814 (9)

Summerville, SC 29483 (10)

Centreville, VA 20121 (10)


Charlotte, NC 28211* (10)

*note: this respondent reported that her’s could possibly have arrived Fri March 16th (Day 24)

__________________________________________________________________________________

69


Fairport, NY 14450 (10)


Chesterfield, VA 23832 (10)



Bladensburg, MD 20710 (10)

Henniker, NH 03242 (10)

____________________________________________________________________________


Waco, TX 76708 (8) Saint Louis, MO 63131 (9) Bolingbrook, IL 60440 (9)

_________________________________________________________________________

70

March issue rec’d – on or between Monday through Thursday March 19 – 22 (Day 27 – 30)

Rockville Centre, NY 11570 (10)

________________________________________________________________________________


Summerfield, FL 34491 (10)


________________________________________________________________________________

71


Charlotte, NC 28215 (10) Washougal, WA 98671 (7) Hammond, LA 70403 (9)

___________________________________________________________________________________


Parkersburg, WV 26104 (10)

_____________________________________________________________________________________


Charleston, WV 25303 (10)

____________________________________________________________________________________

72

March issue rec’d – Wednesday April 4 (Day 43)

Westminster, MD 21157 (10)

Ellicott City, MD 21042 (10)

_________________________________________________________________________________

March issue rec’d – Wednesday April 25 (Day 64)

Appleton, WI 54915 (9)

_________________________________________________________________________________

March issue rec’d – Thursday April 26 (Day 65)

Brookfield, WI 53045 (9)

______________________________________________________________________________

END OF MARCH ISSUE RAW DATA

73

OZIP DZIP Standard Mail Service Standard

924 005 10924 006 10924 007 10924 008 10924 009 10924 010 10924 011 10924 012 10924 013 10924 014 10924 015 10924 016 10924 017 10924 018 10924 019 10924 020 10924 021 10924 022 10924 023 10924 024 10924 025 10924 026 10924 027 10924 028 10924 029 10924 030 10924 031 10924 032 10924 033 10924 034 10924 035 10924 036 10924 037 10924 038 10924 039 10924 040 10924 041 10924 042 10924 043 10924 044 10924 045 10924 046 10924 047 10924 048 10924 049 10924 050 10924 051 10924 052 10924 053 10

74

924 054 10924 055 10924 056 10924 057 10924 058 10924 059 10924 060 10924 061 10924 062 10924 063 10924 064 10924 065 10924 066 10924 067 10924 068 10924 069 10924 070 10924 071 10924 072 10924 073 10924 074 10924 075 10924 076 10924 077 10924 078 10924 079 10924 080 10924 081 10924 082 10924 083 10924 084 10924 085 10924 086 10924 087 10924 088 10924 089 10924 090 10924 091 10924 092 10924 093 10924 094 10924 095 10924 096 10924 097 10924 098 10924 100 10924 101 10924 102 10924 103 10924 104 10924 105 10

75

924 106 10924 107 10924 108 10924 109 10924 110 10924 111 10924 112 10924 113 10924 114 10924 115 10924 116 10924 117 10924 118 10924 119 10924 120 10924 121 10924 122 10924 123 10924 124 10924 125 10924 126 10924 127 10924 128 10924 129 10924 130 10924 131 10924 132 10924 133 10924 134 10924 135 10924 136 10924 137 10924 138 10924 139 10924 140 10924 141 10924 142 10924 143 10924 144 10924 145 10924 146 10924 147 10924 148 10924 149 10924 150 10924 151 10924 152 10924 153 10924 154 10924 155 10924 156 10

76

924 157 10924 158 10924 159 10924 160 10924 161 10924 162 10924 163 10924 164 10924 165 10924 166 10924 167 10924 168 10924 169 10924 170 10924 171 10924 172 10924 173 10924 174 10924 175 10924 176 10924 177 10924 178 10924 179 10924 180 10924 181 10924 182 10924 183 10924 184 10924 185 10924 186 10924 187 10924 188 10924 189 10924 190 10924 191 10924 192 10924 193 10924 194 10924 195 10924 196 10924 197 10924 198 10924 199 10924 200 10924 201 10924 202 10924 203 10924 204 10924 205 10924 206 10924 207 10

77

924 208 10924 209 10924 210 10924 211 10924 212 10924 214 10924 215 10924 216 10924 217 10924 218 10924 219 10924 220 10924 221 10924 222 10924 223 10924 224 10924 225 10924 226 10924 227 10924 228 10924 229 10924 230 10924 231 10924 232 10924 233 10924 234 10924 235 10924 236 10924 237 10924 238 10924 239 10924 240 10924 241 10924 242 10924 243 10924 244 10924 245 10924 246 10924 247 10924 248 10924 249 10924 250 10924 251 10924 252 10924 253 10924 254 10924 255 10924 256 10924 257 10924 258 10924 259 10

78

924 260 10924 261 10924 262 10924 263 10924 264 10924 265 10924 266 10924 267 10924 268 10924 270 10924 271 10924 272 10924 273 10924 274 10924 275 10924 276 10924 277 10924 278 10924 279 10924 280 10924 281 10924 282 10924 283 10924 284 10924 285 10924 286 10924 287 10924 288 10924 289 10924 290 10924 291 10924 292 10924 293 10924 294 10924 295 10924 296 10924 297 10924 298 10924 299 10924 300 10924 301 10924 302 10924 303 10924 304 10924 305 10924 306 10924 307 10924 308 10924 309 10924 310 10924 311 10

79

924 312 10924 313 10924 314 10924 315 10924 316 10924 317 10924 318 10924 319 10924 320 10924 321 10924 322 10924 323 10924 324 10924 325 9924 326 10924 327 10924 328 10924 329 10924 330 10924 331 10924 332 10924 333 10924 334 10924 335 10924 336 10924 337 10924 338 10924 339 10924 340 10924 341 10924 342 10924 344 10924 346 10924 347 10924 349 10924 350 9924 351 9924 352 9924 354 9924 355 9924 356 9924 357 9924 358 9924 359 9924 360 10924 361 10924 362 9924 363 10924 364 9924 365 9924 366 9

80

924 367 10924 368 10924 369 9924 370 9924 371 9924 372 9924 373 10924 374 10924 375 9924 376 10924 377 10924 378 10924 379 10924 380 9924 381 9924 382 9924 383 9924 384 9924 385 9924 386 9924 387 9924 388 9924 389 9924 390 9924 391 9924 392 9924 393 9924 394 9924 395 9924 396 9924 397 9924 398 10924 399 10924 400 9924 401 9924 402 9924 403 10924 404 10924 405 10924 406 10924 407 10924 408 10924 409 10924 410 10924 411 10924 412 10924 413 10924 414 10924 415 10924 416 10924 417 10

81

924 418 10924 420 9924 421 9924 422 9924 423 9924 424 9924 425 10924 426 10924 427 9924 430 10924 431 10924 432 10924 433 10924 434 10924 435 10924 436 10924 437 10924 438 10924 439 10924 440 10924 441 10924 442 10924 443 10924 444 10924 445 10924 446 10924 447 10924 448 10924 449 10924 450 10924 451 10924 452 10924 453 10924 454 10924 455 10924 456 10924 457 10924 458 10924 459 10924 460 9924 461 9924 462 9924 463 9924 464 9924 465 9924 466 9924 467 10924 468 10924 469 9924 470 10924 471 9

82

924 472 9924 473 9924 474 9924 475 9924 476 9924 477 9924 478 9924 479 9924 480 10924 481 10924 482 10924 483 10924 484 10924 485 10924 486 10924 487 10924 488 10924 489 10924 490 9924 491 9924 492 10924 493 9924 494 9924 495 9924 496 10924 497 10924 498 9924 499 9924 500 8924 501 8924 502 8924 503 8924 504 9924 505 8924 506 9924 507 9924 508 8924 509 8924 510 8924 511 8924 512 8924 513 8924 514 8924 515 8924 516 8924 520 9924 521 9924 522 9924 523 9924 524 9924 525 8

83

924 526 9924 527 9924 528 9924 530 9924 531 9924 532 9924 534 9924 535 9924 537 9924 538 9924 539 9924 540 9924 541 9924 542 9924 543 9924 544 9924 545 9924 546 9924 547 9924 548 9924 549 9924 550 9924 551 9924 553 9924 554 9924 555 9924 556 9924 557 9924 558 9924 559 9924 560 9924 561 9924 562 8924 563 9924 564 9924 565 9924 566 9924 567 9924 570 8924 571 8924 572 8924 573 8924 574 8924 575 8924 576 8924 577 8924 580 8924 581 8924 582 8924 583 8924 584 8

84

924 585 8924 586 8924 587 8924 588 8924 590 7924 591 7924 592 8924 593 8924 594 7924 595 8924 596 7924 597 7924 598 7924 599 7924 600 9924 601 9924 602 9924 603 9924 604 9924 605 9924 606 9924 607 9924 608 9924 609 9924 610 9924 611 9924 612 9924 613 9924 614 9924 615 9924 616 9924 617 9924 618 9924 619 9924 620 9924 622 9924 623 9924 624 9924 625 9924 626 9924 627 9924 628 9924 629 9924 630 9924 631 9924 633 9924 634 9924 635 9924 636 9924 637 9924 638 9

85

924 639 9924 640 8924 641 8924 644 8924 645 8924 646 8924 647 8924 648 8924 649 8924 650 8924 651 8924 652 8924 653 8924 654 8924 655 8924 656 8924 657 8924 658 8924 660 8924 661 8924 662 8924 664 8924 665 8924 666 8924 667 8924 668 8924 669 8924 670 8924 671 8924 672 8924 673 8924 674 8924 675 8924 676 8924 677 7924 678 7924 679 7924 680 8924 681 8924 683 8924 684 8924 685 8924 686 8924 687 8924 688 8924 689 8924 690 7924 691 8924 692 8924 693 7924 700 9

86

924 701 9924 703 9924 704 9924 705 9924 706 9924 707 9924 708 9924 710 8924 711 8924 712 9924 713 9924 714 9924 716 9924 717 8924 718 8924 719 8924 720 9924 721 9924 722 9924 723 9924 724 9924 725 9924 726 8924 727 8924 728 8924 729 8924 730 8924 731 8924 733 8924 734 8924 735 8924 736 8924 737 8924 738 8924 739 7924 740 8924 741 8924 743 8924 744 8924 745 8924 746 8924 747 8924 748 8924 749 8924 750 8924 751 8924 752 8924 753 8924 754 8924 755 8924 756 8

87

924 757 8924 758 8924 759 8924 760 8924 761 8924 762 8924 763 8924 764 8924 765 8924 766 8924 767 8924 768 8924 769 7924 770 8924 771 8924 772 8924 773 8924 774 8924 775 8924 776 8924 777 8924 778 8924 779 8924 780 8924 781 8924 782 8924 783 8924 784 8924 785 8924 786 8924 787 8924 788 8924 789 8924 790 7924 791 7924 792 7924 793 7924 794 7924 795 8924 796 8924 797 7924 798 7924 799 7924 800 7924 801 7924 802 7924 803 7924 804 7924 805 7924 806 7924 807 7

88

924 808 7924 809 7924 810 7924 811 7924 812 7924 813 6924 814 6924 815 6924 816 7924 820 7924 821 7924 822 7924 823 7924 824 7924 825 7924 826 7924 827 7924 828 7924 829 7924 830 7924 831 7924 832 7924 833 7924 834 7924 835 7924 836 7924 837 7924 838 7924 840 6924 841 6924 842 6924 843 6924 844 6924 845 6924 846 6924 847 6924 850 5924 852 5924 853 5924 855 6924 856 6924 857 6924 859 6924 860 6924 863 5924 864 5924 865 6924 870 7924 871 7924 872 7924 873 6

89

924 874 6924 875 7924 877 7924 878 6924 879 6924 880 6924 881 7924 882 7924 883 7924 884 7924 885 7924 889 5924 890 5924 891 5924 893 6924 894 6924 895 6924 897 6924 898 6924 900 4924 901 4924 902 4924 903 4924 904 4924 905 4924 906 4924 907 4924 908 4924 910 4924 911 4924 912 4924 913 4924 914 4924 915 4924 916 4924 917 4924 918 4924 919 4924 920 4924 921 4924 922 3924 923 3924 924 3924 925 3924 926 4924 927 4924 928 4924 930 4924 931 5924 932 4924 933 4

90

924 934 5924 935 4924 936 5924 937 5924 938 5924 939 6924 940 6924 941 6924 942 6924 943 6924 944 6924 945 6924 946 6924 947 6924 948 6924 949 6924 950 6924 951 6924 952 6924 953 6924 954 6924 955 6924 956 6924 957 6924 958 6924 959 6924 960 6924 961 6924 962 7924 963 7924 964 6924 965 7924 966 10924 967 10924 968 10924 969 10924 970 7924 971 7924 972 7924 973 7924 974 7924 975 7924 976 7924 977 7924 978 7924 979 7924 980 7924 981 7924 982 7924 983 7924 984 7

91

924 985 7924 986 7924 988 7924 989 7924 990 7924 991 7924 992 7924 993 7924 994 7924 995 10924 996 10924 997 10924 998 10924 999 9

92

The Flute Network

Documents

Transcript of The Flute Network