FIGHTING THE FUNDING OF TERRORISM UTILIZING TERRORIST FINANCING OPERATIONS A Strategic Planning...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
Transcript of FIGHTING THE FUNDING OF TERRORISM UTILIZING TERRORIST FINANCING OPERATIONS A Strategic Planning...
FIGHTING THE FUNDING OF TERRORISM UTILIZING TERRORIST FINANCING OPERATIONS
A Strategic Planning Project Submitted
By
Lee M. Flowers
to
University of Maryland University College
HMLS 304
Professor
Dr. Robert L. Ditch, EdD
December 7th 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION
Background …………………………………………………………….3
Statement of the Problem……………………………………………….4
Operational Definitions…………………………………………….…...5
Significance of the Study..…………….………………………………..6
Summary………………………………………………………………..9
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Pertinent Studies……………………………………………………….. 13
Reflection …………….………………………………………………... 18
Summary……………………………………………………………….. 19
3. STRATEGIC PLAN
Introduction…………………………….………………………………. 20
Restatement of the Problem…………………………………….……….20
2
Mission and Vision Statement…………………………………………..22
Strategic Plan Description……………………………………………….23
Summary………………………………………………………………... 35
4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSConclusion………………………………………………………………37
Recommendations………………………………………………………39
REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………40
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background
In response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks, U.S. government officials publicly declared that
the fight against al Qaeda financing was as critical as the
fight against al Qaeda itself. “After 9/11, President Bush
said, ‘Let’s round up all the usual suspects and freeze
their assets.” Making the financial front the first
considered area of focus in the war on terror. It has been
presented as one of the keys to success in the fight against
terrorism: if we choke off the terrorists’ money, we limit
their ability to conduct mass casualty attacks. In reality,
3
completely choking off the money to al Qaeda and affiliated
terrorist groups has been impossible. At the same time,
tracking al Qaeda financing has proven a very effective way
to locate terrorist operatives and supporters and to disrupt
terrorist plots. Money fuels the operations of terrorists.
It’s needed to communicate, buy supplies, fund planning, and
carry out acts of destruction. This spending leaves a trail;
a trail that we can follow to help expose extremists and
their network of supporters; sometimes before they can
strike. That’s why shortly after 9/11, we established the
Terrorist Financing Operations Section (TFOS).
Within the Federal Bureau of Investigation, TFOS is
responsible for following the money, providing
financial expertise on our terrorism investigations,
and centralizing efforts to identity extremists and
shut down terrorism financing in specific cases.
(Tracking the Money Trails 2013)
More recently, TFOS has adopted a broader strategy to
identity, disrupt, and dismantle all terrorist-related
4
financial and fundraising activities. “A key element is
using financial intelligence to help identify previously
unknown terrorist cells, recognize potential terrorist
activity/planning, and develop a comprehensive threat
picture, while continuously being mindful of the money
trail.” (Tracking the Money Trails 2013)
Statement of the Problem
As detailed in the March 2005 U.S. Department of State
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, “the United States has
a three-tiered anti-money laundering-
counter-narcotics/counterterrorist financing (known as
TFOS): strategy that employs traditional and non-traditional
law enforcement techniques and intelligence operations to
disrupt and dismantle terrorist financial networks.”
(Charles, R. B. 2005) These efforts may include
investigations, diplomatic actions, criminal prosecutions,
and designations, among other actions. While also ensuring
that the programs continue to improve among US allies in
order to safeguard Global efforts and deter terrorist
5
financing. In order to implement this strategy it requires
communicating effectively at all levels in order to achieve
the desired results.
TFOS will continue to set anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorist financing standards in the context of
an increasingly sophisticated financial system, and
work to ensure global compliance with those standards.
TFOS will enhance its focus on informal and non-
traditional methods of financing terrorism and money
laundering, including through cash couriers,
alternative remittance systems, and the abuse of non-
profit organizations. (Tracking the Money Trails 2013)
For years America has attacked terrorist cells and
groups, with little emphasis focused on their operational
funding and logistics. If our attacks focused on cutting
terrorists’ supplies and logistics, this would make it
nearly impossible for these cells to operate. For example,
Southeast Asia remains an important financial center of Al
Qaeda. Rudner, M. stated in his work on Terrorism financing
6
that;
“They have developed their own funding mechanisms,
including charities, front companies, donations,
underground banking, gold and gem smuggling, and petty
crime to support their operations. Terrorism depends on
a substantial mobilization of financial resources to
support its complex organization, from domestic
activities to its world wide organizational operations.
Focusing on the assistance provided by other middle
eastern communities, consisting of front organizations,
clandestine networks, business enterprises, propaganda
media and other local exactions to create funding for
operations.” (Rudner, M. 2010)
Another interesting fact that was pointed out by Rudner is
that in some places, where an organization is dominant in
the community, they will make the people pay a heavy tax to
ensure their safety. These organizations have become
extremely successful and well organized much like a Fortune
500 company.
7
Operational Definitions
An overview of the organizational functions of Al Qaeda
to ensure their budgets are met:
“Administrative Superstructure: Funds for salaries, physical
facilities, office equipment and supplies, communications,
travel, protective security;
Armed Militia: Funds for recruitment, training camps,
command and control systems, procurement of explosives,
armaments, rockets and missiles, logistics, infrastructure;
Economics and Social Services: Funding for housing, medical
clinics, social services, Water supply, agricultural
extension, rural electrification;
Inter-Terror Cooperation: Provision of training and material
support to Hamas,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other international partner
organizations,” (Terrorism Finance: Fund-Raising And Money-
Laundering)”
“Martyr’s Charity” (Bonyad-e Shahid): Pay benefits to
8
families of suicide bombers;
Political Campaigns: Funds for publicity, rallies, and
patronage;
Propaganda: Subsidies to support the Hezbollah-backed
Lebanese Media Group And its subsidiaries, especially Al-
Manna television and Al-Nor radio; Religious Institutions:
Financial support for mosques, clergy, education, dawa
(Islamic outreach)
Acronym Directory
AML Anti-Money Laundering
AML/CFT Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing
of Terrorism
BSA Bank Secrecy Act
CFT Countering the Financing of Terrorism
CTAG Counter-Terrorism Actions Group
9
CTAP Counter-Terrorism Action Plan
ECHR European Convention on Human Rights
FASP Financial Sector Assessment Program
GCC Gulf Cooperation Council
GWOT Global War on Terrorism
IFTS Informal Funds Transfer System
JI Jemaah Islamiyah
KMM Kumpulan Mujahidin Malaysia
MENAFATF Middle East and North Africa Financial Action
Task Force
MERC Medical Emergency Relief Charity
MILF Moro Islamic Liberation Front
OFAC Office of Foreign Assets Control
QK Quality King
RICO Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
10
Organizations Act
SDGT Specially Designated Global Terrorist
TFOS Terrorism Financing Operations Section
Significance of the Study
When TFOS specifically targets the above resources it
makes the War on Terrorism a much more simple process.
Throughout history, successful combat missions have revealed
when the enemy has no supplies or necessities to fight,
operate or train; they lose. “Shutting down terrorist
funding is difficult, but not impossible. It is also an
important investigative tool that can be exploited, but the
political will must be there.” (Hoffman, B. 2010) Terrorism
costs money. In fact, some experts have described money as
“the lifeblood” of terrorist organizations. Without money,
these groups could not conduct their operations or exist. It
is estimated according to our intelligence community that in
order to successfully operate their organization they make
11
about 500 million annually us dollars. Surprisingly a
majority of their funds comes from charitable donations,
most of the donations are of prepaid cards from Germany.
Just as we in America have established support for our
wounded through the Veterans affairs and other support
groups, the terrorist cells have also started a similar
charity for wounded resistance fighters to support the
martyrs of the resistance.
International governmental sources have noted Al Qaeda
involvement in human smuggling, drugs and arms
trafficking, trade in contraband, money-laundering,
forging travel documents, and financial fraud.
Hezbollah sympathizers and operatives are also reputed
to have resorted to hostage taking, extortion, drug
trafficking, and trade in counterfeit goods, import-
export scams, and mafia-style shakedowns of local Arab
communities. (Rudner, M. 2010)
To date, none of these mechanisms have effectively been
shut down. Our authorities are willing to arrest known
12
operatives, however, they are not effectively pursuing
individuals financing the terrorist acts. This is the
biggest failure; the enforcement of sanctions has proven to
be politically driven and unequal. Little has been done to
obstruct the means for funding terrorism. A Council on
Foreign Relations task force said that: “Al Qaeda’s
financial backbone is built from the foundation of
charities, non-governmental organizations, mosques,
websites, fund-raisers, intermediaries, facilitators, and
banks and other financial institutions that helped finance
the mujahidin. This network extends to all corners of the
Muslim world.” (Roth, J., Greenburg, D., & Wille, S. 2004)
To help prevent terrorism TFOS devised and implemented
sanctions to freeze the funds, financial assets, and
economic resources of individuals who finance and support
acts of terrorism. The Terrorist Financing Operations
Section has been characterized as "the sole vehicle for
truly global action against the twin threats of Al-Qaida and
the Taliban." (Ball, H. 2005) To date, approximately 490
individuals and entities have been placed on a list, known
13
as the "Consolidated List," and their assets are required to
be frozen. Despite its importance in combating global
terrorism, the TFOS asset freeze program has not been
implemented effectively.
“However, there has been no significant increase in the
amount of funds frozen under the sanctions regime since
2004. Member States are not freezing terrorist-related
assets, despite their obligation to do so.” (Gurulé, J.
2009) Furthermore, the TFOS Monitoring Team estimates that
ninety-five percent of the total value of the assets frozen
to date results from the freezing actions of only nine field
offices. Proving the failure of TFOS to inspect and ensure
proper procedures are being followed. “In an age of
international terrorism, drug violence in our streets and on
our borders, and organized crime, stopping illicit money
flows that support those atrocities is a national security
imperative,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.
HSBC used its U.S. bank as a gateway into the U.S.
financial system for some HSBC affiliates around the
world to provide U.S. dollar services to clients while
14
playing fast and loose with U.S. banking rules. Due to
poor TFOS controls, TFOS allowed banks to expose the
United States to terrorist financing, suspicious
travelers checks, bearer share corporations, and rogue
jurisdictions. (CARL, L. 2005)
Summary
The finding of the Monitoring Team suggests that TFOS
is not taking seriously their obligations to ensure the
freezing of al Qaeda-and Taliban-related assets. Even when
names are added to the List, TFOS has been reluctant to
follow and ensure the policies set in place are followed.
Several reasons have been offered for the decline in the
number of listing submissions to the Committee and the lack
of enforcement by TFOS, including the: “(1) lack of capacity
by the section to enforce these sanctions; (2) lack of
information for names on the list; and (3) due process and
human rights concerns regarding the procedures employed for
designation.” (Tracking the Money Trails 2013) TFOS has been
hesitant in enforcing these sanctions and has allowed
15
certain offices and sections of the Government to violate
the legal laws set forth to protect America.
Sometimes an organization may need a quiet reminder of
its obligations in order to tighten its procedures, but
at other times, a more public encouragement might be
necessary. The Terrorist Financing Operations Section
may need to decide what action to take in what
circumstances. It will want to exhaust every possible
avenue before allowing the situation to become
confrontational. The intermediate steps should invoke a
close and confidential dialogue between the TFOS and
the office of concern to establish the facts and
illuminate the underlying reasons for non-compliance.
(Gurulé, J. 2005)
“The goal of counter-terrorism,” according to Mathew
Levitt, “should be to constrict the environment in which
terrorists operate,” including “their logistical and
financial support networks,” which “denies terrorists the
means to travel, communicate, procure equipment and conduct
attacks.” (Abuza, Z. 2003) This is the most difficult part
16
in the war on terrorism, as terrorist organizations use
creative ways to fund their operations. It has never been a
priority for law enforcement or counter-terrorism officials.
Terrorist financing was always seen as secondary to
counterterrorist operations, but never a priority. One of
the problems in the current counterterrorist strategy is
that it is too focused on arresting the leaders of Al Qaeda
to collapse these organizations. Yet both have proven they
are capable of replacing their leadership and developing new
command and control.
Counter-terrorist strategy has not focused on targeting
the “institutions of terror.” Disrupting the terrorist
foundation, including sources of funding, and
eliminating the space that terrorists need to plan,
train, and execute attacks must be given as much
attention as the arrests of individual terrorists for
the war on terrorism to be successful. (Abuza, Z. 2003)
The International Monetary Fund is especially concerned
about the possible consequences of terrorist financing.
Their research has shown that money laundering and financing
17
terrorism go hand in hand. Ultimately, creating chaos to
the financial sector of the economy. These activities can
destroy the integrity and stability of financial
institutions and systems, discourage foreign investment, and
change international capital flows. They have negative
consequences for a country’s financial stability at the
microeconomic level, resulting in losses, draining resources
from more productive economic activities, and some even have
spillover effects on the economies of other countries,
inevitably leading to macroeconomic catastrophe. As the
world becomes more and more interconnected, the negative
effects of these activities are felt at the macro level, and
their impact on the financial integrity and stability of
countries is devastating. Specifically stating that,
problems in one country will quickly spread to other
countries until it affects the entire world.
18
Chapter Two
Literature Review
This literature review will focus on the ways the
(TFOS) can effectively fight terrorist organizations beyond
simply trying to deny terrorist access to financing.
Specifically, TFOS can use the financial information or the
flow of money to connect terrorist to their supporters
discovering their actual operations base. More importantly,
when TFOS disrupts access to financial aid and effectively
follows the money trail, our Government will be able to
19
coordinate effective attacks and disrupt terrorist
operations. This will be accomplished by centralizing our
intelligence efforts (internationally and domestically),
ensuring we remain diplomatic within our dealings with the
United Nations committee, by sharing investigative
information effectively, building camaraderie and enhancing
our relationship within the United Nations committee.
Ultimately, allowing the section to alleviate terrorist
attacks nationally and eventually globally. The purpose of
this literature review is to review specific information
from resources and establish common ground on the
effectiveness of disrupting the financial aid of terrorism.
The question used for this literature review will be, “What
strategies can the Terrorist Financing Operations Section
utilize in order to effectively identify, disrupt, and
destroy all terrorist related financial assets, while
ensuring member states are held accountable?”
“There are two things a brother must always have for
jihad, himself and money.” al-Qaeda Operative (John Roth
2004)
20
The blanket statement; “Winning the War on Terrorism”
unfortunately this is not an option, there will always be
radicals and extremists willing to sacrifice everything to
make their voices heard or to gain political and religious
ground, meaning villains will always exists as proven
throughout history. TFOS goal should not focus solely on
defeating terrorism, but should focus on disrupting
terrorist making it dangerous for them to operate, train,
and conduct their mission, while making it exceedingly
costly for them to support their intentions. Since the
attacks of September 11th, discovering and counteracting
terrorist activities have been top priorities for the
Government. The main goal of President George Bush’s Global
War on Terror (GWOT) “was to deny terrorist access to the
international financial system, to impair their ability to
raise funds, and to expose, isolate, and incapacitate their
financial networks. (Executive Order 13224)
6
Like most
organizations, terrorist groups need financing to operate,
organize, recruit, train, and equip followers. However, if
TFOS is going to be effective in its mission it will need to
expand on the President’s statement. Simply trying to deny
terrorist access to financing and funding is not feasible.
The most important step is following the money by using
21
coordinated intelligence agencies, and investigations
domestically and internationally leading to the bases of the
terrorist cells and organizations allowing the capture and
seizures of all assets preventing further support,
disrupting their flow of money and denying them access to
financial resources and preventing attacks.
“For more than 2,000 years, military strategists have
recognized the truism that armed conflict cannot be waged
until it has been financed.” (Hinnen T. 2003) Combating
terrorist financing must be done by stopping the flow of
money that provides these organizations with support
necessary to carry out their acts. Targeting and regulating
charities has been a main focus of the Terrorist Financing
Operations Section since September 11, 2001. Funding of
Islamic charities through the zakat creates a large pool of
assets than can be used inappropriately and disbursed to
terrorist cells. Zakat is the amount of money that every
adult, mentally stable, free, and financially able Muslim,
male and female, has to pay to support specific people. This
category of people is defined in surah at-Taubah verse 60:
The alms are only for the poor and the needy, and those
who collect them, and those whose hearts are to be
reconciled, and to free the captives and the debtors,
22
and for the cause of Allah, and the wayfarers; a duty
imposed by Allah. Allah is knower, Wise. (Qur'an)
When taken into perspective the Zakat accounts for an
incredible amount of money that is required by all Muslims
to be contributed annually, the money is loosely regulated
and can easily become compromised and used to support
terrorism. Making the United States efforts of watching
these and following the money a number one priority since
9/11.
Today, we have launched a strike on the financial
foundation of the global terror network... we will
direct every resource at our command to win the war
against terrorists: every means of diplomacy, every
tool of intelligence, every instrument of law
enforcement, every financial influence. We will starve
the terrorists of funding, turn them against each
other, rout them out of their safe hiding places and
bring them to justice.
(Bush G. 2001)
“There are five ways through which terrorist’s finance
their organizations: direct contributions, international
donations into charitable foundations, state sponsorship,
23
criminal activities, and the collection of the
zakat.”( Jeanne K. Giraldo and Harold A. Trinkunas 2007) “Of
these five, international donations and the zakat made to
Islamic charitable foundations stand out as the primary
concerns for combating terrorism.” The zakat is intended to
support specific Muslims, “those with no possessions or
livelihood, those that cannot meet basic needs, zakat
workers, converts, those escaping slavery, bondage or
indebtedness, stranded travelers, and those with fulfilling
a strong cause for Allah.” (Costigan and Gold 2010) With the
last intention “fulfilling a strong cause for Allah” loosely
interpreted by the extremists and radicals, to mean
supporting their terroristic missions in the name of their
God. Meaning that through interpretation, manipulation, or
force the terrorist will use much if not all of the
donations. “Terrorist organizations receive funds for a
myriad of different activities other than operational
efforts of attack to include propaganda, recruitment, and
maintaining the organizational network.”( Costigan and Gold
2010) This is obviously a concern that these charities can
24
be easily controlled and molested by terrorist organizations
to acquire the zakat. “Evidence points out that one-third of
all Islamic charities have supported terrorist organizations
in one way or another.”(Alterman 2006)
“As the lead agency in of the Department of Justice for
national security and combating criminal activities,
and empowered by Title III of the USA PATRIOT act’s
“material support” legislation, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation is an important part of countering
terrorist financing.”(Weiss 2006)
The FBI is required to bridge the gap between local and
state governments while spear heading the “Joint Terrorism
Task Forces, participation in the National Security
Council’s Policy Coordination Committee on Terrorism
Financing and The State Department Terror Finance Working
Group.” However, the question remains; “Are the efforts of
the FBI more specifically TFOS meeting the goals necessary
to eradicate, disrupt, dismantle, and or following the money
enough to make financing terrorism more difficult through
25
legal channels?” The fight against the financing of
terrorism is aimed at effectively identifying, disrupting,
and destroying all terrorist related financial assets and
prosecuting those who are aiding them in completing their
missions. TFOS mission is to ensure that it constricts the
lifeblood of support from terrorism inevitably making it
more difficult for terrorists to use their means and
resources. By using the available tools proactively, TFOS
can identify terrorist networks and development counter
intelligence on these cells. The main goal is to ensure that
Member States are appropriately adopting and using the
asset-freezing program (which have reduced the possibilities
for terrorists and their organizations to misuse the
financial sector and make it more difficult to raise and
move funds) of suspected terrorist, whether it is
supporters, banks, or charities thus limiting the amount of
funds available to the terrorist. The second step is for
the Member States to implement this rule in a consistent
way, while monitoring the progress will be part of the
Terrorist Financing Operations Section.
26
Currently, there is no policy established that forces
intelligence and information sharing within the U.S.,
between, law enforcement, local, state, and tribal officials
let alone our partner nations. There is currently an ample
amount of ways to allow for intelligence sharing amongst the
needed sectors that are not being utilized effectively nor
in a timely manner in order to restrict terrorist funding.
The U.S. must keep continuously calling on Member States to
increase the cooperation of information sharing through each
financial intelligence community and private financial
sectors until improvement of the exchange of information is
successful in combating terrorist financing.
Reflection
Evaluating the details of the research above shows the
need for funding in order to support terrorist missions is
significant. Showing that the only true way to stop
terrorism is the disruption of funding to their
organizations Even though some attacks have been
accomplished at a low cost, the overhead of the terrorists’
organizations is costly to maintain; from the direct costs
27
of attacks, to maintaining and developing a “modern day
terrorist” and their ideology to spreading propaganda and
recruiting. This understanding of terrorist financing will
allow TFOS to organize and ensure the strategic plan
implementing specific areas to target in order to restrict
the flow of currency into terrorist hands. The objective of
this review was to pinpoint the areas of focus for future
planning. With the information that has been obtained you
can logically decipher that in order to “Win the War on
Terrorism” TFOS must effectively target the correct sources
of funding and eradicate the suppliers. Most importantly
that a multicultural relationship is developed and nurtured
to be successful and productive in preventing the financial
flow of funds to the terrorist. Meaning that TFOS must
establish a trusting relationship with our counterparts
overseas.
Summary
The literature review cemented the role of TFOS and why
it is vital to the financial sectors in combating terrorist
financing. History has also proven that, important
28
information on suspicious or unusual transactions needs to
be reported without limits between all relevant parties,
nationally as well as internationally. The effective
multicultural communication through information exchange and
feedback are vital in a global attack on terrorism
financing. In order to disrupt terrorist financing it is
imperative that TFOS be given the funding authority to
coordinate and direct the actions without restraining their
flexibility or resources against terrorist organizations.
The Member States must work together in sharing information
in a timely effective manner without limitations. And
modifications must be made to laws in order to allow for
swift and active measures to be taken against terrorist
financing stateside and abroad. Just as the terrorists are
very cellular and mobile we must also be flexible and mobile
in order to adapt to this new asymmetrical type of combat.
Over the past 12 years the fight against terrorist and
terrorism has been fought with our Department of Defense, by
putting boots on the ground and attacking them heads on. It
is now time to be proactive and direct our attention towards
29
preventing the fight and disabling terrorism by constricting
the flow of money until the last cell can no longer operate
and is strangled from existence.
Chapter Three
Strategic Plan
Introduction
This strategic plan gives vision to future of the
Terrorist Financing Operations sections imbedded within the
FBI. This plan will inevitably and continuously adapt to
ensure its success against terrorism. The plan is a
foundation to build from with flexibility to ensure mission
success. This plan was formulated due to the lack success
30
currently against terrorism financing, noting that all
assets necessary to be successful are available, but are not
being utilized to achieve the desired results.
Restatement of Problem
As detailed in the March 2005 U.S. Department of State
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, “the United States has
a three-tiered anti-money laundering-
counter-narcotics/counterterrorist financing (known as
TFOS): strategy that employs traditional and non-traditional
law enforcement techniques and intelligence operations to
disrupt and dismantle terrorist financial networks.”
(Charles, R. B. 2005) These efforts may include
investigations, diplomatic actions, criminal prosecutions,
and designations, among other actions. While also ensuring
that the programs continue to improve among US allies in
order to safeguard Global efforts and deter terrorist
financing. In order to implement this strategy it requires
communicating effectively at all levels in order to achieve
the desired results.
31
TFOS will continue to set anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorist financing standards in the context of
an increasingly sophisticated financial system, and
work to ensure global compliance with those standards.
TFOS will enhance its focus on informal and non-
traditional methods of financing terrorism and money
laundering, including through cash couriers,
alternative remittance systems, and the abuse of non-
profit organizations. (Tracking the Money Trails 2013)
For years America has attacked terrorist cells and
groups, with little emphasis focused on their operational
funding and logistics. If our attacks focused on cutting
terrorists’ supplies and logistics, this would make it
nearly impossible for these cells to operate. For example,
Southeast Asia remains an important financial center of Al
Qaeda. Rudner, M. stated in his work on Terrorism financing
that;
They have developed their own funding mechanisms,
including charities, front companies, donations,
underground banking, gold and gem smuggling, and petty
32
crime to support their operations. Terrorism depends on
a substantial mobilization of financial resources to
support its complex organization, from domestic
activities to its world wide organizational operations.
Focusing on the assistance provided by other middle
eastern communities, consisting of front organizations,
clandestine networks, business enterprises, propaganda
media and other local exactions to create funding for
operations. (Rudner, M. 2010)
Another interesting fact that was pointed out by Rudner
is that in some places, where an organization is dominant in
the community, they will make the people pay a heavy tax to
ensure their safety. These organizations have become
extremely successful and well organized much like a Fortune
500 company. To date, none of these mechanisms have
effectively been shut down. Our authorities are willing to
arrest known operatives, however, they are not effectively
pursuing individuals financing the terrorist acts. This is
the biggest failure; the enforcement of sanctions has proven
to be politically driven and unequal. Little has been done
33
to obstruct the means for funding terrorism. To help prevent
terrorism TFOS devised and implemented sanctions to freeze
the funds, financial assets, and economic resources of
individuals who finance and support acts of terrorism. The
Terrorist Financing Operations Section has been
characterized as "the sole vehicle for truly global action
against the twin threats of Al-Qaida and the Taliban."
(Ball, H. 2003) To date, approximately 490 individuals and
entities have been placed on a list, known as the
"Consolidated List," and their assets are required to be
frozen. Despite its importance in combating global
terrorism, the TFOS asset freeze program has not been
implemented effectively.
“However, there has been no significant increase in the
amount of funds frozen under the sanctions regime since
2004. Member States are not freezing terrorist-related
assets, despite their obligation to do so.” (Gurulé, J.
2009)
Furthermore, the TFOS Monitoring Team estimates that
ninety-five percent of the total value of the assets frozen
34
to date results from the freezing actions of only nine field
offices. Proving the failure of TFOS to inspect and ensure
proper procedures are being followed.
Mission Statement
To follow and track terrorist financing operations
Following the Money, provide financial expertise on our
investigations, and centralize authority that identify
terrorists and shut down terrorism financing. Enforce state
participation to encourage international cooperation. While
keeping the specific strategy to identify and destroy all
terrorist financing and support.
Vision Statement
To constrict the Life Blood of Terrorism, (financial
flow) and prevent terrorist attacks domestically and
internationally. We will starve the terrorists of funding
driving them from their hiding places and relentlessly
attacking them until they are unable to operate. Using
their fear against the extremist driving them to a state of
35
paranoia, and making them turn on one another. We will
force anyone supporting them to abandon immediately leaving
them vulnerable and exposed. Inevitably leading to the end
of terrorism.
Strategic Plan Description
We will first begin the planning following the
announcement and promotion process of developing a strategic
plan. The involvement of elected personnel as well as the
appropriate stake holders while simultaneously informing the
appropriate government officials to ensure collaboration
amongst all parties and to ensure all team members are on
board with the initial planning process. When this is
established we identify the facilitator or the entire
planning process to ensure compliance with all missions and
task. The next step will be gaining the support of the FBI
where a majority of all stakeholders will be established; it
is imperative they are provided with as much information
about the process as possible to ensure that the lanes of
communication are open and feedback is welcomed. Then
begins the detailed information gathering process such as
36
relevant intelligence pertaining to the organization as well
as the specific statistics needed to organize the basis of
the plan and to establish in black and white where the
problem lies. Once the information process is established
it will be necessary to develop the Mission Statement as
well as the Vision Statement it is vital that stakeholders
are involved in this process to ensure their support in the
strategic plans overall goals. The mission for Terrorist
Financing Operations Section is to follow and track
terrorist financing operations Following the Money, provide
financial expertise on our investigations, and centralize
authority that identify terrorists and shut down terrorism
financing. Enforce state participation to encourage
international cooperation. While keeping the specific
strategy to identify and destroy all terrorist financing and
support. The mission statement allows everyone to easily
identify what are main objectives are and to focus on the
assignment during the planning process. The vision
statement is to constrict the Life Blood of Terrorism,
(financial flow) and prevent terrorist attacks domestically
37
and internationally. We will starve the terrorists of
funding driving them from their hiding places and
relentlessly attacking them until they are unable to
operate. Using their fear against the extremist driving
them to a state of paranoia, and making them turn on one
another. We will force anyone supporting them to abandon
immediately leaving them vulnerable and exposed. Inevitably
leading to the end of terrorism. The vision statement
relies on what our long-term goals are, it is the end result
of our hard work and dedication. It is essential to the
strategic planning process that the mission and vision
statements are clear and concise to ensure all parties have
an understanding of the foundation to ensure the plan is
designed accordingly.
The analysis will focus on what is currently working
for other terrorist financing prevention sections and what
areas are problematic amongst these types of organizations.
Keeping in mind terrorism financing is an issue we face
globally not just nationally this is an issue and a task to
be addressed by all members to ensure the safety and
38
security internationally as well.
The plans goal is to reach the U.N. to ensure
compliance with previously designated plans and the
reiteration of the importance of freezing terrorist assets
through programs sanctions by the U.N. that are not
currently being upheld. The key players we need to target
will begin with director James B. Comey (FBI), Rand Beers
(DHS), but most importantly the Security Council sanctions
committees of the United Nations. It is extremely important
to have the support of all individuals to ensure
implementation of this plan; it is also imperative that they
are reminded that they are the primary stakeholders in this
mission as well. The factors that need to be considered are
political and economical. The politics involved will be of
a delicate nature to ensure there are no offenses made to
the states that have faulted in their mission to freeze
terrorist assets. The issue will need to be addressed
lightly to ensure their compliance in this mission as well
as their support. The economic effects for other countries
will rely on their ability to fund the necessary programs to
39
prevent terrorist financing as well as train the appropriate
amount of field agents to ensure they have the resources
necessary to follow and exploit the flow of money to
terrorist organizations. However, the first steps remain
constant that the US must first establish a universal
concept of constricting the flow of money that supports
terrorism. Once the US has established a concept that is
proven and statistically challenged it will encourage
multilateral international concepts that mirror our plan.
Lastly, the focus will unavoidably return to funding where
the idea of following the money allows the organization to
pay for itself. The money that will be frozen or
confiscated from terrorist will be used to acquire the
resources necessary to evolve with the changing and ever
mobile terrorist, allowing us to profit from their
wrongdoings and pushing to support other terrorist financing
operations sections globally. The funding will come from
the terrorist organizations, meaning the more funds that are
seized, the more sophisticated our organizations will
become. Our section will revolve around four specific
40
goals:
1. Safeguarding the financial system against corruption
by freezing terrorist assets and following the flow
of money back to origination.
2. Preventing or reducing the flow of capital to
support terrorism, by preventing money laundering
and other monetarist crimes.
3. Increase international collaboration to freeze
funding of terrorist while establishing a strong
stance against money laundering
4. Ensure compliance with intelligence sharing to
ensure timely and relevant information is being
passed through SIPR domestically as well as
internationally.
41
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Challenges
(SWOC) Analysis
StrengthsProgram Funds Itself Education/ Training
Creating Revenue State of the art EquipmentTraining Facility Expert Field AgentsCommunications Capabilities System previously createdExperienced Agents Previous Expertise Agency collaboration International Relationships establishedFBI establishedUnited Nations backed programsTechnical Expertise
WeaknessesRefusal to share Information abroad Multiple Government agenciesRecruitment of agents Burnout rate of agentsAmount of agents needed UN inability to cooperateTrust issues with secret intelligence Newly developedsections (growing pains)Complex analysis Investigative support
Opportunities
42
Grants Law enforcement involvement Amount of funding available Intelligence communitySupport from the FBI Multi Supporting agencies Benefits Package Technological advancementsCross Training Global attention
Training UN supported program Increased Staffing Interoperable system
Flexibility in adjusting to terrorism
ChallengesBurnout rate of agents Working globally Communication internationally Communicating effectively amongst all involved agencies Becoming proactive vrs. Reactive Ensuring compliance overseasImplementing consequences to member states who are non-compliant Complete focus on the mission Very little time away from workEffective use of resources and time Cooperating
with our peers internationally
Developing camaraderie internationally Strict rules
and regulations
The overall goal of this strategic plan is to
defeat terrorism by constricting its lifeblood until
terrorist organizations and cells are no longer able to
43
operate or function. This can only be realized when all
objectives are met, on the home front as well as overseas.
This plan will lay the foundation that will successfully
lead to the demise of terrorism, as we know it. As of today
little has been done to disrupt the extensive financial
networks that Al Qaeda and other terrorist cells have
established. It is imperative that we take into account our
history of past success when fighting any war, first cut off
supplies and logistics making our enemy desperate and
bringing them into the open. When you take away their will
and means to fight, America will inevitably destroy all
terrorist cells and win the war on terrorism. In order to
accomplish this we must first outpace our enemies globally
and digitally. Al-Qaeda has become more of a cellular
structure over the years making them more mobile and without
a need for a typical hierarchical organization meaning they
have lowered cost to the point of just being cheap. The
U.S. must combat Al-Qaeda’s resiliency (and other terrorist
cells) through constant technical innovations and enforcing
the policies set by the U.S. and sanctioned by a unified
44
U.N. only in this way can we successfully stop terrorist
financing.
"Money laundering and the financing of terrorism are
financial crimes with economic effects. They can
threaten the stability of a country's financial sector
or its external stability more generally. Effective
anti-money laundering and combating the financing of
terrorism regimes are essential to protect the
integrity of markets and of the global financial
framework as they help mitigate the factors that
facilitate financial abuse. Action to prevent and
combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism
thus responds not only to a moral imperative, but also
to an economic need." (Zhu M, 2012)
Implementation of Plan
The implementation of this plan will begin immediately
and will follow guidelines set in the following objectives
to ensure compliance and success. This plan will take place
over a five-year period focusing on each objective starting
at the beginning of each calendar year. For example;
45
objective one will begin January 2014, objective two
commences January 2015, objective three January 2016, and
objective four January 2017. The fifth year beginning with
January 2018, will focus on adapting the objectives to new
intelligence gathered as well as feedback from our agents.
The plan is designed as a foundation to build from;
predictably leading to success. To ensure accomplishment of
this plan it is imperative that the plan has the flexibility
to remain malleable during its growing process. The
objectives of the plan and strategies are described:
Objective 1:
The first step in implementing this plan begins with
safeguarding the financial system against corruption by
freezing terrorist assets and following the flow of money
back to terrorist originations. Terrorist or criminal
access to our financial market poses a threat to the
national security of the U.S. and the U.S. financial system.
The September 11th attacks on the World Trade Centers cannot
be looked at as a coincidence. These attacks were executed
in hopes of destroying our financial network and destroying
46
America. Now our focus must be on preventing terrorist from
integrating itself into our financial market to support
terroristic missions. The strategies must be implemented in
order to achieve our desired objectives; protecting specific
areas of the financial industry by utilizing our anti-money
laundering programs following the rules and regulations
under the Bank Secrecy Act. Any suspicious activity must be
reported immediately and an extremely detailed record of the
activity is required. Informing financial institutions of at
risk activity and properly training them to ensure
compliance, while encouraging employees to report suspicious
activity. Constantly informing small businesses and the
public to be mindful of terrorist activities and their
financing methods. When a report is generated and has
successfully reached TFOS, we will then engage our plan to
either freeze the assets or follow the money; using the
institution to further gather information. Success will be
measured by tracking the financial institutions efforts on
freezing assets. This measure will be effective because it
will show in real-time and whole dollar amounts how much was
47
seized and from where. Allowing our field agents to
continually follow the trail and develop new leads.
Objective 2:
To prevent or reduce the flow of capital to support
terrorism, by preventing money laundering and other
monetarist crimes. The Terrorist Financing Operations
Section combined with the FBI is one of the largest
collectors of financial intelligence in the U.S.; the
information collected is extremely valuable as an
investigative tool that will expose terrorist funding and
other financial crimes. The data will be collected and
placed strategically in order to allow an agent to follow
the trail of money in a chronological order. We will
continuously expand our analysis of pertinent information as
well as classified information to better allow for the
section to adapt and evolve with the terrorist (flexibility
in our approach is key). The fist step to accomplishing our
mission is to ensure we have established a secure
infrastructure that will allow us to analyze classified
data; as the information increases so will the need for more
48
field agents to disburse the workload. This will also
create the need to ensure our agents are constantly being
trained and updated on new information immediately. No
agent field or otherwise will be authorized OJT they will
all complete the mandatory curriculum before engaging and
acting on behalf of TFOS. Remembering that this objective
will consistently grow and change in real-time, agents must
be flexible and willing to adapt immediately to ensure the
growth of the section and implement new technology.
Finally, we must ensure that constant supervision over the
financial institutions to ensure compliance with asset
freeze program. It is TFOS agent’s responsibility to
analyze financial institutions data to ensure compliance
with the programs set in place; any data that is not
characteristic or reasonable will constitute a red flag in
that institution. Where we will need to follow the
interactions of the institution to establish whether it has
been compromised, infiltrated, or supporting terrorist cells
or organizations. If this is established and confirmed that
either the bank is helping terrorist activities in money
49
laundering or funding our agents have the authority to act
immediately and freeze the institution until we can complete
our investigation thoroughly. Success will be measured by
the monetary value seized that was prevented from reaching
its destination. It will also be analyzed by the amount of
terroristic activities before and after, to establish what
cell or organization was impacted.
Objective 3:
Increase international collaboration to freeze funding
of terrorist while establishing a strong stance against
money laundering As TFOS is part of the financial crimes
enforcement network; we are members of the Egmont Group a
group of financial intelligence units (FIU) allowing us to
collaborate effectively using over 139 member FIU’s. The
main objectives and goals of these FIU’s are to promote the
exchange of ideas as well as training opportunities for
these units. In order to be successful it is vital that
these units around the world cooperate effectively in the
fight against terrorism, money laundering, and the financing
or support of terrorism through monetarist support. TFOS
50
will remain the leader in the financial intelligence field;
combating terrorist funding, therefore it is imperative that
we excel in our leadership role while involved in the Egmont
process. This will allow TFOS to increase awareness and
help develop international cooperation. With the focal
point remaining to attack the financing of terrorism at the
international level leading to a more secure financial
network globally. TFOS will develop and implement new FIU’s
in regions that are deemed more susceptible to terrorism
funding and money laundering, in areas such as the Middle
East. TFOS will develop and train these new FIU’s to ensure
compliance will the universal goal established and
sanctioned by the U.N. While TFOS is developing these new
agencies it will allow us to work on interagency
communications and expand our knowledge on the overall
picture. TFOS will also establish cross-training measures
within these units to ensure the amount of knowledge is
shared internationally as well as building trust and
camaraderie amongst peers in these FIU’s. As these FIU’s
develop and grow and each new unit is established it is
51
crucial that leadership is established to ensure compliance
of the objectives and to ensure collaboration amongst the
units. Constantly reinforcing the idea of communicating and
sharing information if the terrorism financial sections.
Success will be measured by the amount of FIU’s established;
they must be running efficiently and effectively will little
support. This will only be accomplished through proper
training, mentoring and development of their field agents.
Success will also be tested during times of real life
situations and how effectively communication flow within the
units.
Objective 4:
Ensure compliance with intelligence sharing to ensure
timely and relevant information is being passed through SIPR
domestically as well as internationally. This objective
will be the most challenging; even with the known threat of
terrorist activity around the globe. TFOS has established
that in order to achieve success in fighting the funding of
terrorism we must gather and rapidly disperse accurate
intelligence in order to follow the money trail. The data
52
that is collected and managed by all agents within TFO’s as
well as the FIU’s must maintain its integrity to ensure well
derived leads can be established and followed. It is our
focus to ensure we expand on the proper technology to ensure
we have the ability to meet this objective. When used
correctly these methods will dramatically increase our
response times and allow for tremendously fast transfers of
information to appropriate units. The strategy is to take a
very aggressive stance in this area to encourage and enhance
a more secure and easily accessible web-based product to
analyze and transfer data that can be shared amongst all
units. It will also become necessary for TFO’s to provide
the technology training necessary to all units in order to
accommodate this objective. During training sessions TFO’s
will ensure that a single member from each unit is available
to guarantee that collaboration, ideas, information sharing
as well as feedback is available for these field agents to
report back to their units and disperse the information.
The training provided will remain under strict guidance and
controls to safeguard the integrity of the training and
53
enhance our international relationships. Success will
ultimately be measured by the development of a user-friendly
web-based system that allows our field agents to easily
communicate and analyze necessary data in order to stop the
flow of money to support terrorism.
Schedule for Performance Assessment
To ensure our success with the strategic plan, it will
be necessary to access the plan on a monthly basis. Each
objective will receive the attention of 12 meetings, over
the span of one year, to ensure we are on track to meet our
goals. These conferences will take place on the 1st Monday
of every month, this will be designated as a training day
and the entire section of TFOS will be present and three
representatives from each FIU (to ensure international
compliance). The first portion of the meeting will focus on
the challenges with achieving our objectives, meaning what
areas need adjusted or improved to ensure our success. The
second portion will focus on what part of our strategic plan
is successful and why it was successful. The final and third
54
portion of our conference will focus around team building,
we will design programs and activities that allow for agents
to work in teams; they will be required to successfully
prevent a false terrorist attack. This will allow for the
agents to develop some possible new strategies in
successfully obstructing the flow of money to terrorist
cells. It is also, important to keep in mind if we are
failing to achieve our objectives then we must immediately
adjust to guarantee success in our endeavors. The
assessment of TFOS development will happen simultaneously
with the growth of our sections on a daily basis, the
constant analysis of data will prove our overall success.
The only true measures of success will be the effective
countering of terrorist financing through multiple measures,
that include asset-freezing, deterrence, disruption, or
prevention of terrorist attacks; and the identification of
new terrorist cells, suspects and their supporters.
Summary
The strategic plan presented will allow TFOS’s
influence to spread internationally and allow for a wide
55
array of information sharing globally. TFOS will remain the
tip of the spear in these endeavors, while leading our
international peers to success as well as protecting America
from terrorist attacks. As financial institutions become
aware of terrorist activities they will become exceedingly
successful at freezing and preventing the funding of
terrorism. Allowing the initial constriction of lifeblood
supporting these terrorists. This will permit our agents to
begin following the money trails that are left behind; this
information will become our most valuable investigative
tool, permitting us to branch off into distinctive areas of
terrorist financing. The agents will follow all leads to
either a dead end, or a successful capture and seizure of
either terrorists or their money. During this process of
following the money, it will permit our agents to ensure
compliance with the asset-freezing program internationally.
The field agents will unavoidably be working overseas while
following these leads, this will allow them access to the
other FIU’s offices, while the agents are there it will
allow them to oversee the development of the asset-freezing
56
program. The agents will either encourage them to freeze
known terrorists assets or report them for their non-
compliance; leading to a quick reprimand and exposure of
their sections failures. This is necessary to ensure the
integrity of the FIU’s and to ensure they remain fearful of
TFOS rather than the terrorist. If an agent realizes an FIU
has been compromised the unit will be immediately shut down
and disbanded while each individual will be placed in
discrete holding cells until they can be aggressively
interrogated. This measure in itself will also be a
successful attack against terrorist and their infiltration
into the global financial market. Our agents will be
trained to be ever vigilant in areas such as the Middle East
that are easily susceptible to terrorist funding. However,
not all FIU’s are will be under a negative light; with our
agents travel overseas this will allow for more information
sharing amongst peers in our field. This will encourage
international collaboration and ensure that our counterparts
develop a trusting relationship that will foster growth and
success in our fields. Making the information sharing
57
process vital in the success of stopping terrorist funding.
The terrorist will remain a global threat; they are
dispersed all over the world and communicate effectively
amongst their cells, and just as they are mobile, we will
become their shadow that follows the trail leading to their
demise.
Chapter Four
58
Conclusion
September 11, 2001, was a wakeup call to all
Americans, as well as the international population,
challenging everyone’s policies on countering and preventing
terrorism. Up to that point terrorist attacks were not
necessarily on the catastrophic level such as 9/11, claiming
only a small number of lives and property damage, never
truly pushing the United States government to change its
policies regarding terrorism. We previously had the
misconception that our government was managing terrorism
effectively, never allowing any real threats to reach our
doors. America truly believed that living in the United
States made them impenetrable to terrorist attacks or
invasions. September 11th was the foundation that leads to
policy changes nationally and internationally, opening our
eyes to the enemy’s far-reaching capabilities, and
highlighted our previous policies, proving the need for
modification. The reactionary stance our government was
taking against terrorism was no longer effective, making it
crucial that the United States as well as the international
59
community; to develop a campaign against terrorism as a more
offensive approach. Allowing us to take the offensive route
we established the USA Patriot act specifically Title III,
allowing the FBI the ability to counter terrorist financing,
leading to the development of TFOS. The success of this
plan relied solely on its ability to undermine terrorist
financial networks. The TFOS has proven it has the ability
to bridge the gap between local and state governments with
the need to gain support internationally, in order to attack
terrorism on a global level. TFOS most valuable
contributions has been from their development of financial
profiles, of terrorist organizations, providing a solid
foundation to predict terrorist financing operations,
stemming from investigations and “following the money”.
These methods have been building attention domestically and
internationally helping TFOS develop laws that have become
sanctioned by the U.N. to combat terrorist financing and
funding worldwide. TFOS has remained the tip of the spear
and will continue to develop new FIU’s in sections of the
world that are susceptible to terrorism allowing us a strong
60
hold in their operating grounds. TFOS has helped to develop
these laws domestically and internationally, however,
internationally is still proving to be a challenging
endeavor.
Terrorist Financing Operations Sections will continue
to develop our relationships with the international
governments and communities, educating our predecessors on
the processes of denying access by terrorist and their
supporters to the international financial system. While
continuously pressing the matter of open lines of
communication as well as valuable feedback provided from
field agents. Combating terrorism cannot rely solely on
military engagements, it must include coordinated attacks
from our FIU’s orchestrated by TFOS to disrupt, prevent, and
seize all assets of terrorist related financing. These
proactive measures will allow us to take an offensive stance
against terrorism and effectively prevent another 9/11-size
assault. In order for us to realize success in our
endeavors against terrorism, we must continue to adapt to
the ever-mobile terrorist cells. We must continue our
61
efforts internationally to develop open lines of
communication, and we must continue to work together
globally sharing vital information and resources to further
our cause against terroristic attacks. The focus must
remain on constricting the flow of money to terrorist, by
safeguarding our financial systems, freezing terrorist
assets, following the money trail, and developing
international relationships that are conducive to mission
success. This is how we will attain our vision to constrict
the Life Blood of Terrorism, (financial flow) and prevent
terrorist attacks domestically and internationally; starving
the terrorists of funding driving them from their hiding
places and relentlessly attacking them until they are unable
to operate. Using their fear against the extremist driving
them to a state of paranoia, and making them turn on one
another. We will force anyone supporting them to abandon
immediately leaving them vulnerable and exposed. Inevitably
leading to the end of terrorism.
Recommendation
62
In order for the plan and measures to achieve success,
we must gain attention and support from the U.N., with the
support of our international brethren the attack on
terrorist funding and financing will begin. It is necessary
that specific consequences be established from the beginning
to ensure member states are compliant with the rules and
regulations established. With a plan supported by the U.S.
and sanctioned by the U.N. member states will be forced into
compliance, out of trepidation of the consequences they will
be forced to maintain their character and integrity in the
fight against terrorism universally. We must be allowed to
aggressively pursue whatever means necessary to deny the
funding or financial support of terrorism, and have the
ability to serve swift consequences to those who choose the
latter. As a universal stance we must establish the mindset
that terrorism can, and will cease to exist, when all
parties domestically and internationally unite against this
atrocity, to protect humanity and destroy terrorism leaving
the world a secure and safer place. We can make military
attacks unnecessary, if the terrorist can no longer support
63
their supply and logistics train. When this stance is taken
globally we will ensure the end of terrorism.
References
Abuza, Z. (2003). Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiya. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal Of International & Strategic Affairs,25(2), 169-199.
Alterman, Jon B. and Karin Von Hippel. Understanding Islamic Charities. Significant Issues Series. Vol. 29, no. 7. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT). (2012) Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT).
<http://www.imf.org/external/np/leg/amlcft/eng/>.
Ball, H. (2005). U.S. Homeland Security : A Reference Handbook. SantaBarbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
Beyond borders 2013: are the Department of Homeland Security's international
agreements ensuring actionable intelligence to combat threats to the U.S. homeland? : field hearing before the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
Bonn, K. E., & Baker, A. E. (2000). Guide to Military Operations Other Than War : Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Stability and Support Operations: Domestic and International. Mechanicsburg, Pa: Stackpole Books.
CARL, L. (n.d). HSBC EXPOSED U.S. FINANCIAL SYSTEM TO MONEY
LAUNDERING, DRUG, TERRORIST FINANCING RISKS. FDCH Press Releases,
Charles, R. B. (2005). 2005 International Narcotics Control
64
Strategy Report. DISAM Journal Of International Security Assistance Management, 27(3), 60-64.
Freeman, M. (2011). The Sources of Terrorist Financing: Theory and Typology. Studies In Conflict & Terrorism, 34(6), 461-475. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2011.571193
Giraldo, Jeanne K. and Harold A. Trinkunas. Terrorism Financing and State Responses : A Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
Gurulé, J. (2009). THE DEMISE OF THE U.N. ECONOMIC SANCTIONSREGIME TO DEPRIVE TERRORISTS OF FUNDING. Case Western ReserveJournal Of International Law, 41(1), 19-63.
Hoffman, B. (2010) (n.d). Al Qaeda's Uncertain Future. Studies In Conflict & Terrorism,
36(8), 635-653.H.R. 5005, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, day 3 : hearing before the Select
Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives, One HundredSeventh Congress, second session, on H.R. 5005, the Homeland Securoty
Act of 2002, day 3, July 17, 2002. (2004). Washington : U.S. G.P.O. :For Sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 2004.
Introduction: America's Longest War. (2012). Retrieved October 26, 2013, from Journal Of Psychohistory n.d.;40(2):137-141. Available from: Social Sciences Citation Index
Jeanne K. Giraldo and Harold A. Trinkunas, Terrorism Financing and State Responses: A Comparative Perspective (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007), 60.
John Roth, Douglas Greenburg, and Serena Wille, National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, Monograph on Terrorist Financing: Staff Report to the Commission (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2004)
Rudner, M. (2010). Hizbullah Terrorism Finance: Fund-Raisingand Money-Laundering.
Studies In Conflict & Terrorism, 33(8), 700-715. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2010.494169
65
The White House, Executive Order 13224, Blocking Property and Prohibiting
Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support
Terrorism, 23 September 2001, Available from http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-13224.htm; Internet; Accessed on 19 November 2013
Totten, M. J. (2013). Radical Islam's Global Reaction. World Affairs, 175(5), 25-32. Tracking the Money Trails. (2013, July 5). FBI. Retrieved November 23, 2013, from
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2013/july/terror-financing-tracking-the-money-trails/terror-financing-tracking-the-money-trails
Yusufu Bagaji, A. S., Etila, M., Ogbadu, E. E., & Sule, J. (2012). Boko Haram and the Recurring Bomb Attacks in Nigeria: Attempt to Impose Religious Ideology through Terrorism?. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(1), 33-41.
doi:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120801.1370
66