ELECTORAL AREAS - Columbia Shuswap Regional District

ELECTORAL AREAS A GOLDEN-COLUMBIA B REVELSTOKE-COLUMBIA C SOUTH SHUSWAP D FALKLAND-SALMON VALLEY E SICAMOUS-MALAKWA F NORTH SHUSWAP-SEYMOUR ARM MUNICIPALITIES: GOLDEN SICAMOUS REVELSTOKE SALMON ARM

PO BOX 978 781 MARINE PARK DRIVE NE

SALMON ARM BC V1E 4P1

TEL: (250) 832-8194 FAX: (250) 832-3375

TOLL FREE: 1-888-248-2773

AGENDA DATE: Thursday July 18, 2013

TIME: Regular Board Meeting - 9:30 AM PLACE: Columbia Shuswap Regional District Boardroom

DELEGATIONS

1. 10:30 AM Shuswap Hospice Society DEL1-2

CALL TO ORDER

ADMINISTRATION

ADOPTION OF MINUTES

1. Board Meeting - adoption of minutes

A1-10

Motion THAT: the minutes of the June 20, 2013 Board Meeting be adopted.

CORRESPONDENCE 1. Christy Clark, Premier (June 26, 2013) - UBCM Convention

A11-12

2. UBCM (June 25, 2013) – 2013/14 Regional Community to Community Forum/Funding Approval

A13-18

PLACE CURSOR OVER PAGE NUMBER ON THE RIGHT

HAND SIDE OF THE PAGE TO VIEW ATTACHMENT

Board Agenda July 18, 2013 of 10

CORRESPONDENCE (cont.) 3. White Lake Residents Association (June 25, 2013) – Request for Letter of

Support

A19-20

Motion THAT: the Board acknowledge receipt of the letter from the White Lake Residents Association dated June 25, 2013; AND THAT: a letter be sent to the White Lake Residents Association indicating that the Board supports in principle the Association’s application to have the White Lake Community Watershed designated as a protected watershed pursuant to the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation; AND FURTHER THAT: a copy of the letter be sent to the Ministry of Transportation, urging the Ministry to address the residents’ concerns regarding the condition of the road, speed of some vehicles and noise issues..

BUSINESS GENERAL 1. Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process (SLIPP)

- Correspondence from Area ‘E’ Director Martin dated June 26, 2013 & from Area ‘C’ Director Demenok (undated) with attachment

A21-24

Motion THAT: $50,000 be allocated from the regional feasibility study fund to explore the feasibility of continuing to fund and participate in the Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process; AND THAT: the Thompson Nicola and North Okanagan Regional Districts be requested to participate in the feasibility study process.

2. Policy No. A-62 “Electronic Sign Boards – Recreation Facilities” - Report attached from G. Holte, Manager, Environment & Engineering

Services dated July 2, 2013

A25-28

Motion THAT: the Board approve the inclusion of Electronic Sign Board-Recreation Facilities Policy A-62 into the CSRD Policy Manual.


BUSINESS GENERAL (cont.) 3. Seymour Arm Electric Power Service Area Establishment and Loan

Authorization Referendum - Report attached from C. Black, Deputy, Manager, Corporate

Administration Services dated July 8, 2013

A29-32

Motion THAT: a referendum be held on September 28, 2013 to obtain the elector's opinion on the establishment of the Seymour Arm electric power service area and loan authorization for capital financing of electric power distribution line construction within the community of Seymour Arm; AND THAT: $7,500 be allocated from the rural feasibility study fund to conduct the referendum.

Motion THAT: Carolyn Black be appointed Chief Election Officer and Colleen Goodey be appointed Deputy Chief Election Officer for the purposes of conducting the referendum on the proposed establishment of the Seymour Arm electric power service area and loan authorization.

4. Malakwa Resource Facility Financial Contribution Service Area Establishment Referendum

- Report attached from C. Black, Deputy, Manager, Corporate Administration Services dated July 8, 2013

A33-36

Motion THAT: a referendum be held on September 28, 2013 to obtain the elector's opinion on the establishment of the Malakwa resource facility contribution service area; AND THAT: $7,500 be allocated from the rural feasibility study fund to conduct the referendum.

Motion THAT: Carolyn Black be appointed Chief Election Officer and Colleen Goodey be appointed Deputy Chief Election Officer for the purposes of conducting the referendum on the proposed establishment of the Malakwa Resource Facility Contribution Service Area.

BUSINESS BY AREA 1. Area ‘B’ &

'C' Grants In Aid Report attached from P. Jarman, Manager of Financial

Services dated July 4, 2013

A37-38

Motion THAT: the Board approve the following allocations from the 2013 electoral grant-in-aids: Area ‘B’ Trout Lake Volunteer Fire Department $3,000 Area ‘C’ White Lake Recreational Society $5,500


BUSINESS BY AREA (cont.) 2. Area 'D' Electoral Area Community Works Funds – Ranchero Fire

Hall Building Report attached from D. Mooney, Deputy Manager,

Environment & Engineering Services dated June 27, 2013

A39-40

Motion THAT: in accordance with Policy F-3, access to the Electoral Area Community Works Fund be approved in the amount of $15,000 from the Electoral Area ‘D’ Community Works Fund for insulation of the service bays at the Ranchero fire hall building.

3. Area 'F' Anglemont Estates Water System Upgrade Report attached from T. Langlois, Water Services Co-

ordinator dated July 5, 2013

A41-46

Motion THAT: the Board empower the authorized signatories to enter into an agreement with Mierau Contractors Ltd. to construct and commission, as designed, the Anglemont Estates Water Treatment Plant, Lake intake/pumping system, booster station and reservoir upgrades for a total cost of $2,557,643 plus applicable taxes.

REPORTS 1. Electoral Area Directors Committee

Minutes from July 11, 2013 meeting will be available at the Board Meeting

2. Receipt of Reports - Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Board (highlights of June

21, 2013 meeting)

A47-48

Motion

THAT: the report from the Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Board be received as information.

ADMINISTRATION BYLAWS 1. 5666 Sorrento Waterworks Service Area Amendment Bylaw No.

5666 - Consideration of adoption

A49-54

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 5666, cited as "Sorrento Waterworks Service Area Amendment Bylaw No. 5666”, be adopted this 18th day of July, 2013.


ADMINISTRATION BYLAWS (cont.) 2. 5668

5669 Area F Dangerous Dog Control Service Establishment Bylaw No. 5668 Area F Dangerous Dog Regulation & Impound Bylaw No. 5669

- Report attached from G. Holte, Manager, Environment & Engineering Services dated July 2, 2013

- Consideration of 3 readings

A55-66

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 5668, cited as "Area `F` Dangerous Dog Control Service Establishment Bylaw No. 5668”, be read a first, second and third time this 18th day of July, 2013.

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 5669, cited as " Area `F` Dangerous Dog Regulation and Impound Bylaw No. 5669”, be read a first, second and third time this 18th day of July, 2013.

3. 5670 SI 9098

Waverly Park Water Upgrade Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 5670 Columbia Shuswap Regional District Security Issuing Bylaw No. 9098

- Report attached from P. Jarman, Manager, Financial Services dated June 25, 2013

- Consideration of 3 readings and adoption

A67-74

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 5670, cited as "Waverly Park Water Upgrade Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 5670”, be read a first, second and third time this 18th day of July, 2013.

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 5670, cited as "Waverly Park Water Upgrade Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 5670”, be adopted this 18th day of July, 2013.

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 9098, cited as "Columbia Shuswap Regional District Security Issuing Bylaw No. 9098”, be read a first, second and third time this 18th day of July, 2013.

Motion

THAT: Bylaw No. 9098, cited as "Columbia Shuswap Regional District Security Issuing Bylaw No. 9098”, be adopted this 18th day of July, 2013.

IN CAMERA

1.

THAT: pursuant to Section 90 (1) (b) of the Community Charter, the Board move In Camera.


DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

ALR APPLICATIONS

1.

LC2480E Area 'E'

Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) Application Section 20 (3) Non Farm Use Within the Agricultural Land Reserve Gordon Wright & Bonny-Lee Jones

- Report attached from D. Passmore, Development Services Assistant II dated June 25, 2013

DS1-16

Motion THAT: Application No. LC2480E Section 20(3) Non-Farm Use within the ALR, for That Part of Legal Subdivision 16 Lying East of the Eagle River, Section 24, Township 22, Range 7, West of the 6th Meridian, Kamloops Division Yale District, be forwarded to the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission recommending approval on this 18th day of July, 2013.

BUSINESS GENERAL

1.

Area 'C' White Lake Subdivision – Request for One Year Deferral of Cash-in-Lieu of Parkland Payment

- Report attached from M. Pachcinski, Team Leader, Parks & Recreation Services dated July 8, 2013

DS17-22

Motion THAT: the Board empower the authorized signatories to enter into a one year Park Land Payment Deferral Agreement to postpone payment to July 18, 2014, for the cash-in-lieu of park land dedication required by Section 941 of the Local Government Act - Provision of park land, and CSRD Policy P-5 Park Land Dedication as a Function of Subdivision, for the proposed subdivision of property legally described as Lot 1, Section 14, Township 22, Range 10, W6M, KDYD, Plan 43063.


ELECTORAL AREA DIRECTORS

BUSINESS BY AREA 1.

Area ‘A’

Development Variance Permit No. 641-03 Mountain Shadows Development Ltd. Inc. No. BC0842297

- Report attached from J. Sham, Development Services Assistant, dated June 27, 2013.

EAD1-14

Motion THAT: in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government Act, Development Variance Permit No. 641-03 for Lot 3, Section 6, Township 27, Range 21, West of the 5th Meridian, Kootenay District, Plan 16263 Except part included in SRW Plan 16465, varying Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641, as follows:

1) by waiving the requirement for proposed Lot 2 that an independent on-site water system be located on the same parcel as the residential dwelling unit; and

2) by waiving the requirement for proposed Lot 1 that the surface water source for an

independent on-site water system be identified on Schedule 'D' List of Eligible Sources of Bylaw No. 641, to allow a source of surface water not on Schedule 'D',

be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to the following condition:

a) that the applicant submit written confirmation to the CSRD that the source contamination prevention methods are complete for proposed Lot 2.

2.

Area ‘A’

Development Variance Permit No. 641-04 Headwater Development Consulting

- Report attached from D. Passmore, Development Services Assistant II, dated June 25, 2013.

EAD15-28

Motion THAT: in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government Act, Development Variance Permit No. 641-04 for Lot 3, Section 31, Township 26, Range 21, West of the Fifth Meridian, Kootenay District, Plan NEP62602, Except Plan NEP68237, varying Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 by waiving the requirement that surface water source for an independent on-site water system be from a source that is on the List of Eligible Sources shown on Schedule D of Bylaw No. 641 to allow a source of surface water that is not on the List of Eligible Sources to supply water for proposed Lot A only, of a proposed subdivision under application No. 2008-00164A, be authorized for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to the following condition:

1. The Agent/Applicant provide documentation to the CSRD illustrating how water service from the Stacey Creek proposed source will be provided to the proposed new Lot A, including any easements over private land or permits from Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to construct waterline appurtenances that are in compliance with Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 requirements.


BUSINESS BY AREA (cont.)

3.

Area ‘B’

Development Permit No. 850-12 Bobcat Property Development Corp.

- Report attached from S. Beeching, Senior Planner II, dated July 2, 2013.

EAD29-54

Motion THAT: in accordance with Section 919.1 (1) (f) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit No. 850-12 for Parcel B (See 159348I), Legal Subdivision 9, Section 30, Township 23, Range 2, W6M, Kootenay District, for the construction of a new washhouse, new electrical building and renovation of an existing utility building, be issued this 18th day of July, 2013.

4.

Area ‘E’

Development Variance Permit No. 2000-71 Exemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements No. 2000-05 Drew & Debra Maternick

- Report attached from D. Passmore, Development Services Assistant II, dated June 24, 2013.

EAD55-84

Motion THAT: in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government Act, Development Variance Permit No. 2000-71 for Lot 7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891, located at 8889 Swanshore Road, varying Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 as follows:

1. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the interior side parcel boundary (north property boundary) from 2.0 m to 1.39 m for the eaves of the proposed new single family dwelling;

2. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (south

property boundary) from 4.5 m to 0.78 m for the eaves of a covered porch on the proposed new single family dwelling;

3. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the front parcel boundary (east property boundary) from 4.5 m to 3.89 m for the eaves of the proposed new garage; and,

4. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (south property boundary) from 4.5 m to 2.0 m for the eaves of the proposed new garage,

be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to the following conditions:

a) receipt of documentation from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure confirming that a permit to encroach into the Provincial setback has been issued;

b) receipt of documentation from the owner confirming that the retaining wall

encroaching onto Eton Road has been removed; and, c) registration on title of the subject property of a suitably worded Section 219 covenant

restricting development of the site to the proposed single family dwelling and detached garage as shown on the Site Plan prepared by Browne Johnson Land Surveyors, dated October 29, 2012 and referencing a Riparian Area Assessment report from a Qualified Environmental Professional and any conditions it may place on development of the subject property.



4. (cont.)

Area ‘E’

Development Variance Permit No. 2000-71 Exemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements No. 2000-05 (cont.)

Motion THAT: in accordance with Section 910(5) of the Local Government Act, Exemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements No. 2000-05 for Lot 7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891, varying Section 2.3.4(3)(a) Floodplain Setback, from 15.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake to 13.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake, for the proposed single family dwelling and detached garage as shown on the Site Plan prepared by Browne Johnson Land Surveyors, be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to the following conditions:

a) registration on title of the subject property of a suitably worded Section 219 covenant prohibiting development on the site unless it complies with the recommendations of the March 19, 2013, report by P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., Omega Engineering regarding flood protection and building elevations; and,

b) that the covenant indemnify and save harmless the CSRD and the Crown in the event

of flood damage to any portion of the subject property.

PLANNING BYLAWS

1.

Area 'C', 'E', & 'F',

Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1

EAD85-128

Motion THAT: Bylaw No. 900-1 cited as "Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1" be read a first time this 18th day of July 2013; AND THAT: the Board utilize the simple consultation process for Bylaw No. 900-1 and it be referred to the following:

Area 'C' Advisory Planning Commission; Area 'E' Advisory Planning Commission; Area 'F' Advisory Planning Commission; Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; Interior Health; Ministry of Environment-Environmental Protection; Ministry of Environment – Parks and Protected Areas Division; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations-Archaeology Branch; Ministry of Energy and Mines; Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development; Transport Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada-Habitat Enhancement; CSRD Environment and Engineering Services; City of Salmon Arm; District of Sicamous; and, Relevant First Nations Band and Councils.


RELEASE OF IN CAMERA RESOLUTIONS (if any)

NEXT MEETING August 15, 2013

ADJOURNMENT

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT

Minutes of a Regular Board meeting held June 20,2013in the Board Room of the Reqional District Office. Salmon Arm. BC

Note: ïhe following minutes are subject to correctionwhen endorsed bv the Board at the next Reqular meetino.

Staff:

* Attended Part of Meeting Only

CALL TO ORDER

The Chair called the meeting to order at 9:30 AM.

ADOPTION OF MINUTES

2013-601 M/S Directors Cannon/Trouton THAT:REGULAR BOARD the minutes of the May 16,2013 Board Meeting be adopted.MEEÏINGMAY 16.2013

PRESENTChair:

Vice Chair:Directors:

D. RavenR. Martin*G. HabartC. Benty*L. ParkerP. DemenokR. TalbotD. Cannon*N. Cooper*D. Trouton*L. Morgan

C. HamiltonC. BlackS. BergerP. Jarman*G. Holte*G. ChristieB. Van Nostrand*T. Langlois*M. PachcinskiC. Doherty"D. Passmore*C. Benner*J. Thingsted*L. Blain*

(City of Revelstoke)(Electoral Area 'E')(Electoral Area 'A')(Town of Golden)(Electoral Area 'B')(Electoral Area 'C')(Electoral Area 'D')(City of Salmon Arm)(City of Salmon Arm)(District of Sicamous)(Electoral Area 'F')

Chief Ad m inistrative OfficerDeputy Manager of Corp. Administration ServicesTeam Leader, Development ServicesManager, Financial ServicesManager, Environment & Engineering ServicesManager, Development ServicesWaste Management Co-ord inatorWater Management Co-ordinatorTeam Leader, Parks & RecreationSEP Co-ordinatorDevelopment Services Assistant llDevelopment Services AssistantPlannerCommunications Coordinator Consultant

CARRIED

A1

Board Minutes

BUSINESS GENERAL

2013-6022012 SOFI REPORT

PACKAGING ANDPRINTED PAPERPRODUCTSTEWARDSHIP

Director Martin arrived at the meeting.

SOLID WASTEMANAGEMENTALTERNATEIVEDISPOSALSTRATEGY REPORT

2013-603POLICY W-8ANGLEMONTESTATES DRAINAGE

BUSINESS BY AREA

2013-604GRANTS IN AID

June 20, 2013

M/S Directors Cannon/Trouton ïHAT:the Board approve the 2Q12 Statement of Financial lnformation Report asrequired by the Financial lnformation Regulation, Schedule 1, Subsection9(2) and Section 814.1, Subsection (1) of the Local Government Act.

CARRIED

The Waste Management Co-ordinator provided a summary of thedevelopments associated with the packaging and printed paper stewardshipprogram including the development of financial incentives for localgovernments that provide curbside collection programs for these wastematerials.

-2-

The Waste Management Co-ordinator advised that it has been determinedthat the solid waste management program has been underfunding reserveaccounts for future landfill closures, post-closure monitoring and operations.The Board was advised that a recommendation will be presented at a futuremeeting to increase tipping fees to meet these anticipated costs.

M/S Directors Morgan/ïalbot THAT:the Board approve the inclusion of Anglemont Estates Drainage Policy W-8 into the CSRD Policy Manual.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Morgan/Talbot THAT:the Board approve the following allocations from the 2013 electoral grant-in-aids:

Area GCarlin & District Recreation AssociationSalmon Arm Children's Festival Society

Area FSeymour Arm Community Association (Barbeque)Seymour Arm Community Association (Wharf)

$9,538$1,000

$4,900$9,000

CARRIED

2013-605 M/S Directors TalboUDemenok THAT:FALKLAND WATER in accordance with Policy F-3, access to the Electoral Area CommunitySYSTEM Works Fund be approved in the amount of $370,000 from the ElectoralCOMMUNITY WORKS Area 'D' Community Works Fund for required upgrades to the FalklandFUND water system.

CARRIED

A2

Board Minutes

BUSINESS BY AREA

201 3-606GARDOM LAKEMANAGEMENT PLANCOMMUNITY WORKSFUND

2013-607MALAKWACOMMUNIÏYLEARNING CENTREECONOMICOPPORTUNITY FUND

PRESENTATION

LOCALGOVERNMENTAWARENESS

REPORTS

201 3-608SHUSWAPEMERGENCYPROGRAMEXECUTIVECOMMITTEE

2013-609

June 20. 2013

(cont.)

M/S Directors Talbot/Demenok THAT:in accordance with Policy F-3, access to the Electoral Area CommunityWorks Fund be approved in the amount of $35,000 from the Electoral Area'D' Community Works Fund to retain a consultant to develop a lakemanagement plan for Gardom Lake;

AND THAT:in recognition of the shared Provincial jurisdiction over Gardom Lake, theexpenditure of the Electoral Area 'D' Community Works Funds be subjectto a minimum one-third financial contribution from the Province of BritishColumbia towards the creation of the Gardom Lake Management Plan.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Martin/Morgan THAT:with the concurrence of the District of Sicamous and the Electoral Area EDirector, the Board approves funding from the Sicamous and Area EEconomic Opportunity Fund to the Malakwa Community CentreAssociation in an amount up to $105,000 for the operation of the MalakwaCom munity Learning Centre.

CARRIED

The Chair presented the prizes to four of the seven winners of the firstannual Capturing the Columbia Shuswap Photo Contest organized as partof Local Government Awareness Week. Prize money and a coffee mugfeaturing their winning photos were presented to Michael Gravells, MaggieBeckner, Lucy Grainger and Sandra Kilmartin.

The Board was in receipt of the minutes and the recommendations from theMay 9, 2013 Shuswap Emergency Program Executive Committee meeting.

M/S Directors Martin/Morgan THAT:the minutes from the May 9, 2013 Shuswap Emergency ProgramExecutive Committee be received.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Trouton/Talbot THATthe 2012 Shuswap Emergency Program Annual Report be approved.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Cooper/Parker THATstaff explore the feasibility of establishing a Service Area for an annualcontribution towards the costs of the Royal Canadian Marine Search andRescue operations.

CARRIED

-3-

2013-610

A3

Board Minutes June 20, 2013

REPORTS (cont.)

2013-611 The Board was in receiptof the minutes from the May 14,2013 meeting ofFRASER BASIN the Fraser Basin Council - Thompson Regional Committee and draftCOUNCIL preliminary recommendations and a committee update from the Columbia& COLUMBIA RIVER River Treaty Local Government's Committee .

TREATY LOCALGOVERNMENT'S M/S Directors TalboUDemenok THAT:COMMITTEE the reports from the Fraser Basin Council and the Columbia River Treaty

Local Government's Committee be received for information.CARRIED

BYLAWS

2013-612 Bylaw No. 5656 allows for the inclusion of Waverly Park into the SorrentoSORRENTO watenuorks service area.WAÏERWORKSSERVICE AREA M/S Directors DemenokiHabart THAT:AMENDMENT BYLAW Bylaw No. 5656, cited as "sorrento Watenruorks Service AreaNO. 5656 Amendment Bylaw No. 5656", be adopted this 20th day of June, 2013.

CARRIED

2013-613 Bylaw No. 5662 allows for registration and reporting from facilities that store,WASTE SïREAM handle and process waste materials.MANAGEMENTLICENSING BYLAW M/S Directors HabarVDemenok THAT:NO.5662 Bylaw No. 5662, cited as "Waste Stream Management Licensing Bylaw

No. 5662", be read a first, second and third time this 20tn day of June,2013.

CARRIED

2013-614 Bylaw No. 5666 allows for the inclusion of three properties into the SorrentoSORRENTO waterworks service area.WATERWORKSSERVICE AREA M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:AMENDMENT BYLAW Bylaw No. 5666, cited as "Sorrento Watenruorks Service Area AmendmentNO.5666 Bylaw No. 5666", be read a first, second and third time this 20th day of

June, 2013.CARRIED

2013-615 Bylaw No. 5667 allows for fee-for-use of the recycling/reload infrastructureREFUSE DISPOSAL at the Salmon Arm refuse disposal site.FACILITIESREGULATORY M/S Directors HabarUDemenok THAT:AMENDMENT BYLAW Bylaw No. 5667, cited as "Refuse Disposal Facilities RegulatoryNO. 5667 Amendment Bylaw No. 5667", be read a first, second and third time this

20tn day of June, 2013.CARRIED

2013-616 M/S Directors Benty/Demenok THAT:Bylaw No. 5667, cited as "Refuse Disposal Facilities RegulatoryAmendment Bylaw No. 5667", be adopted this 20th day of June, 2013.

CARRIED

-4- A4

Board Minutes

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

ALR APPLICATIONS

2013-617LC2476CSUSAN CASHENALC APPLICATIONSECTTON 21 (2)SUBDIVISION WITHTHE ALR

2013-618

DELEGATION

OKANAGANREGIONAL LIBRARY

BUSINESS GENERAL

2013-619SÏRATACONVERSIONAPPLICATIONSP31-F

June 20, 2013

The owner was present at the meet¡ng and advised the Board that theproposed subdivision is intended to provide a parcel of land for her son whoassists in her farming operation.

M/S Directors Demenot</Habart THAT:Application No. LC2476C Section 21(2) subdivision within the ALR for TheSouth East /¿ Section 10, Township 22, Range 10, West of the 6thMeridian, Kamloops Division Yale District, except Plans 84566 and 21230and Parcel A (N56799F) be forwarded to the Provincial Agricultural LandCommission recommending refusal on this 20th day of June, 2013.

M/S Directors Demenok/Morgan THAT:consideration of Application No. LC2476C be deferred for two (2) months toallow for additional meetings between the applicant and CSRD staff.

Directors Habart, Demenok & Morgan lN FAVOURDirectors Benty, Parker, Raven, Talbot, Cooper,

Cannon, Martin & Trouton OPPOSEDDEFEATED

The question was then called on the original motion.

Director Trouton lN FAVOURDirectors Habart, Benty, Parker, Raven, Demenok, Talbot,

Cooper, Cannon, Martin & Morgan OPPOSEDDEFEATED

Stephanie Hall, Executive Director and Michele Rule, CommunicationsManager provided current statistics on library usage and programs includingdigital access options.

M/S Directors Morgan/Talbot THAT:in accordance with Section 242 of the Strata Property Act the Boardempower the authorized signatories to execute the proposed 4 lot plan ofstrata suþdivision of Lot 22, Section 35, Township 22, Range 11, West ofthe 6'n Meridian, Kamloops Division Yale District, Plan 25532, this 20th dayof June, 2013 subject to the prior issuance of a Riparian Areas RegulationDevelopment Permit.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Morgan/Talbot THAT:staff be directed to review and update the current Building ConversionStrata Title Procedure - PR 3 to reflect current legislation, and that theproposed amendments be brought forward to a future Board Meeting forconsideration of approval and inclusion into the CSRD Policy Manual.

CARRIED

-5-

2013-620

A5

Board Minutes

IN CAMERA

June 20, 2013

2013-621 M/S Directors Benty/Demenok THAT:1 1 :13 AM pursuant to Section 90 (1) (e) of the Community Charter, the Board move ln

Camera.CARRIED

2013-622 M/S Directors Parker/Cooper THAT:OUT OF CAMERA the Board move Out of Camera.11:30 AM CARRIED

Directors ïrouton, Benty, Cooper and Cannon left the meeting.

ELECTORAL AREA DIRECTORS

BYLAWS

2013-623 The applicant was present at the meeting and has requested redesignationELECTORAL AREA'B' of LS 3, Sec. 28, Twp 23, Rge 2, W6M, KD except Plans 9004 andOFFICIAL NEP66979 from RH Rural Holdings to RC Resort Commercial and BylawCOMMUNITY PLAN No.2224 and rezoning from RR Rural Residential to RC Resort CommercialAMENDMENT (407638 to permit the construction and use of heli-ski lodge and heli-pad.BC LïD.) BYLAW NO.850-3 M/S Directors Parker/Demenok THAT:& Bylaw No. 850-3 cited as "Electoral Area 'B' Official Community PlanRURAL REVELSTOKE Amendment (407638 BC Ltd) Bylaw No. 850-3" be read a first time thisLAND USE BYLAW 20th day of June, 2013;AMENDMENT (407638BC LTD.) BYLAW NO. AND THAT:2224 the Board utilize the simple consultation process for Bylaw No. 850-3 and

in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act it be referredto the following agencies and First Nations:

. Electoral Area'B'Advisory Planning Commission;¡ Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure;¡ lnterior Health Authority;. Ministry of Environment-Environmental Protection;. Ministry of Lands, Forests and Natural Resource Operations;¡ Ministry of Lands, Forests and Natural Resource Operations-

Archaeology Branch;. Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development;. City of Revelstoke;. School District No. 19;. BC Hydro;. CSRD Environment and Engineering Services;. CSRD Bylaw Enforcement; and. All relevant First Nations Bands and Councils;

AND FURTHER THAT:pursuant to Section 882 of the Local Government Act, the Board hasconsidered this "Electoral Area 'B' Official Community PIan Amendment(407638 BC Ltd) Bylaw No. 850-3" in conjunction with the ColumbiaShuswap Regional District's Financial Plan and its Waste ManagementPlan.

CARRIED

-6- A6

Board Minutes

BYLAWS (cont.)

2013-624ELECTORAL AREA'B'OFFICIALCOMMUNITY PLANAMENDMENT (407638BC LTD.) BYLAW NO.850-3&RURAL REVELSTOKELAND USE BYLAWAMENDMENT (407638BC LTD.) BYLAW NO.2224 (cont.)

BUSINESS BY AREA

2013-625DEVELOPMENTVARIANCE PERMITNO.701-55EXEMPÏION TOFLOODPLAINSETBACKREQUIREMENTSNO.701-09

-7 - June 20. 2013

M/S Directors ParkeriDemenok THAT:Bylaw No. 2224 cited as "Rural Revelstoke Land Use Amendment(407638 BC Ltd) Bylaw No. 2224" be read a first time this 20th day ofJune, 2013;

AND THAT:the Board utilize the simple consultation process for Bylaw No.2224 andbe referred to the following agencies and First Nations:

o Electoral Area 'B'Advisory Planning Commission;. Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure;. lnterior Health Authority;¡ Ministryof Environment-Environmental Protection;. Ministry of Lands, Forests and Natural Resource Operations;. Min¡stry of Lands, Forests and Natural Resource Operations-

Archaeology Branch;. Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development;. City of Revelstoke;. School District No. 19;. BC Hydro;. CSRD Environment and Engineering Services;. CSRD Bylaw Enforcement; ando All relevant First Nations Bands and Councils.

CARRIED

ïhe applicant was in attendance and has requested a variance to SouthShuswap Zoning Bylaw No. 701 to decrease the minimum front parcel linesetback and increase the maximum height for principal buildings andstructures for the existing single family dwelling.

M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government Act DevelopmentVariance Permit No.701-55 for Lot 3, Section 1, Township 23, Range 10,W6M, K.D.Y.D., Plan 10925, located at 4117 Eagle Bay Road, varyingSouth Shuswap Zoning Bylaw No. 701 as follows:

1. Section 7.2.5 minimum setback from the front parcel line from 5.0 mto 3.37 m for the existing single family dwelling; and,

2. Section 7.2.4 maximum height for principal buildings and structuresfrom 10.0 m to 10.35 m for the existing single family dwelling;

be approved for issuance this 20th day of June,2013, subject to thefollowing conditions:

a) receipt of documentation from the Ministry of Transportation andlnfrastructure (MoT) confirming that a permit to encroach into theProvincial setback has been issued; and,

b) registration on title of the subject property of a suitably wordedSection 219 covenant restricting development of the site to thesingle family dwelling and referencing a Riparian Area Assessmentreport from a Qualified Environmental Professional and anyconditions it may place on development of the subject property.

CARRIED

A7

Board Minutes


2013-626DEVELOPMENTVARIANCE PERMITNO.701-55EXEMPTION TOFLOODPLAINSETBACKREQUIREMENTSNO.701-09(cont.)

BYLAWS (cont.)

2013-627SOUTH SHUSWAPZONINGAMENDMENT(SHoRELTNEHOLDTNGS LTD.)BYLAW NO. 701-74&LAKE ZONINGAMENDMENT(SHoRELTNEHOLDTNGS LTD.)BYLAW NO. 9OO-03

2013-628ELECTORAL AREA'C'OFFICIALCOMMUNITY PLANBYLAW NO. 725

-8- June 20, 2013

M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:in accordance with Section 910(5) of the Local Government Act Exemptionto Floodplain Setback Requirements No. 701-09 for Lot 3, Section 1,Township 23, Range 10, W6M, K.D.Y.D., Plan '10925, varying Section3.17.2.1 Floodplain Setback, from 15.0 m from the mean annual highwater mark of Shuswap Lake, defined as 348.3 meters Geodetic Survey ofCanada Datum to no closer than 4.87 m only for the single family dwellingas shown on the Site Plan prepared by Browne Johnson Land Surveyors,be approved for issuance this 20th day of June, 2013, subject to thefollowing conditions:

a) registration on title of the subject property of a suitably wordedSection 219 covenant prohibiting development on the site unless itcomplies with the recommendations of the January 17, 2012 reportfrom Adam Muddiman, P.Geo., of Onsite Engineering Ltd.regarding flood protection and building elevations; and,

b) that the covenant indemnify and save harmless the CSRD and theCrown in the event of flood damage to any portion of the subjectproperty.

CARRIED

Bylaw No. 701-74 and Bylaw No. 900-03 would recognize the newly-constructed addition to an existing waterfront business and exempt thebuilding from floodplain specifications and allow for use of the structure forstore and restaurant purposes.

M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:a public hearing to hear representations on Bylaw No. 701-74, cited as"South Shuswap Zoning Amendment (Shoreline Holdings Ltd.) Bylaw No.701-74" and on Bylaw No. 900-03, cited as "Lakes Zoning Amendment(Shoreline Holdings Ltd.) Bylaw No. 900-03" be held;

AND THAT:notice of the public hearing be given by staff of the Regional District onbehalf of the Board in accordance with Section 892 of the LocalGovernment Act;

AND FURTHER THAT:the holding of the public hearing be delegated to Director Paul Demenok,as Director for Electoral Area 'C' being that in which the land concerned islocated, or Alternate Director Arnie Payment, if Director Demenok isabsent, and the Director or Alternate Director, as the case may be, give areport of the public hearing to the Board.

DI RECTOR TALBOÏ OPPOSEDCARRIED

M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:Bylaw No. 725, cited as "Electoral Area'C'Official Community Plan BylawNo. 725", be read a second time as amended this 20th day of June 2013.

CARRIED

A8

Board Minutes

BYLAWS (cont.)

2013-629ELECTORAL AREA'C'OFFICIALCOMMUNITY PLANBYLAW NO. 725(cont.)

The Board recessed for lunch at 12:00 PM and resumed at 12:30 PM.

BUSINESS GENERAL (cont.)

June 20,2013

M/S Directors Demenok/Habart THAT:a public hearing to hear representations on Bylaw No. 725, cited as"ElectoralArea 'C' Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 725", be held;

AND THAT:notice of the public hearing be given by staff of the Regional District onbehalf of the Board in accordance with Section 892 of the LocalGovernment Act;

AND FURTHER THAT:the holding of the public hearing be delegated to Director Paul Demenok, asDirector of Electoral Area 'C' being that in which the land concerned islocated, or Alternate Director Arnie Payment, if Director Demenok is absent,and the Director or Alternate Director, as the case may be, give a report ofthe public hearing to the Board.

CARRIED

-9-

2013-630HEALTHYCOMMUNIÏIESCAPACITY BUILDINGGRANT

ADJOURNMENT

2013-631ADJOURNMENT12:35 PM

CERTIFIED CORRECT

M/S Directors Martin/Parker THAT:staff explore the possible application for a Healthy Communities CapacityBuilding Grant on behalf of the Eagle Valley Resource Centre prior to theJune 30th application deadline.

CARRIED

M/S Directors Martin/Morgan THAT:the meeting be adjourned.

CARRIED

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERCHAIR

A9

BRITISHCor-uMete

June26,2013

Dear Mayors and Regional District Chairs:

As we prepare for the upcoming UBCM Convention at the Vancouver ConventionCentre in September,I wanted to let you know that my caucus colleagues and I arelooking forward to listening to the discussions around the issues and initiatives thataffect your communities. We will review and consider all of your recommendationswith regard to provincial government matters and incorporate them into ourdiscussions.

As governments at every level face difficult economic times, the theme of the 2013Convention, Navigating the Local Landscape, and the symbol of The Compass, aregood metaphors. Together you will identify the best course of action to navigatethrough the global economic downturn. Your discussions will guide you and yoursuccesses will be instructive.

If you would like to request a meeting with me or a Cabinet Minister on a specificissue during this year's convention, please fill out the online form athttp://www.fin.gov.bc.calUBCM/ . The invitation code is MeetingRequest20l3 andit is case sensitive.

I look forward to seeing you at the 2013 UBCM Convention. If you have any questions,please contact my UBCM Meeting Request Coordinator,TaraZwaan, a|604-775-1600.

Sincerely,u'4qChristy ClarkPremier

A11

carolyn

Typewritten Text

AC1

UBCM \

FIRST NATIONS SUMMTT

Regional Communityto Community Forum

Ad ministration providedby UBCM and First Nations

Summit

Funding provided by theM¡nistry of Community,

Sport & CulturalDevelopment and

Aboriginal Affairs &Northern Development

Canada

Please direct allcorrespondence to:

Local Government House525 Government StreetVictoria, BC, VBV 048

E-mail: [email protected]: (250) 356-5134Fax: (250) 356-5119

C 3qa Ja a3 rÉ4-

CCIPY¡Reg Board

June 25, 2013

Chair Raven and BoardColumbia Shuswap Regional DistrictBox978Salmon Arm, BC, V1E 4P1

RE: 2013/14 (Spring) Regional Community to Community Forum -Funding Approval

Dear Chair and Board,

Thank you for submitting an application for the 2073114 (Spnng)Community to Community (C2C) forum program. We have reviewed allsubmissions and, on behalf of the First Nations Summit and Union of BCMunicipaiities, are pleased to advise you that we have approved yourapplication in the amount of $4,550.00.

A cheque in the amount of fi2,275.00, or 50% of the total approvedamount, will follow shortly. The remainder of the grant will be availableonce we have received the final report and financial summary for yourevent(s).

Funding for this program is provided by the federal and provincialgovernments and is administered by the TIBCM and First NationsSummit. The general Terms & Conditions of this grant are attached. inaddition, in order to satisfy the terms of our contribution agreements, wehave the following requirements:

1) The funding is to be used solely for the purpose of orgamzing andholding a Community to Community Fomm(s);

2) The event(s) must be held before March 31 2014

3) The event(s) must include partrcipation b1, elected officrais frornboth the locai government and First Nation.

4) The grant funds must be matcheci in cash or in-kind;

5) The final report form, available on the UBCM and First NationSummit websites, must be completed and submitted to LIBClr.4,with all required altachments, within 30 days of the completion ofyour event;

6) Any unused funds must be returned to LIBCM within 30 daysfollowing the event.

The Guide to Community to Community Forums in British Columbiawaspublished tn2007 and is available to assist applicants in developing events

C l{crks

!ParksNSEP¡H3

A13

carolyn

Typewritten Text

AC2

in their communities.'T'he Guide is available on the UBCM and FirstNations Sumrnit website.

An information brochure is attached to this ietter. This brochure describesthe Regionai Community to Cornmunity Forurn progfam and we ask thatyour distribute copies of this brochure at your event(s).

We congratulate you for responding io this opportunity to build relationswith neighbouring First Nations and/or local governments and wish youa very successful event.

If you have any questions. please contact Local Government ProgramServices at (250) 356-5134 or [email protected]

Sincerely,

-b"^-'*X-ç>^*Danyta WelchPolicy & Programs Officer

cc: Robyn Cyr, Ë.conomic Deaelopment Offieer, Columbía ShuswapRegiorml District

Enclosures (2)

A14

H.îräürwLocal Government Program Services

General Funding Terms & Gonditions

The purpose of these Terms and Conditions is to provide basic informat¡on an the administration of LocalGovernment Program Services (LGPS) grants. For specific information regarding the terms and conditions of

each funding program, please refer to the Program & Application Guide.

1. Definitions

Approved Applicant - In general, LGPS grants are awarded to local governments (regional districts andmunicipalities). However, under some programs. other organizations, such as First Nations andaboriginal organizations or boards of education. can be the approved applicant. The approved applicantis the primary contact for UBCM and is responsible for overall grant management.Approved Partner(s) - Are organizations that contribute directly to the approved project, are identifiedin the application and are approved by UBCM. Possible partners include, but are not limited to. boards ofeducation, health authorities, First Nat¡ons or aboriginal organ¡zat¡ons, non-profit organìzations and localgovernments (other than the applicant).Approved Project - Is the activity or activit¡es described in the application and approved by UBCM.Cash Expenditures - Are direct costs properly and reasonably incurred and paid for with money by theapproved applicant or approved project partners for the development or implementation of the approvedproject. For example, catering and consultant fees can be cash expend¡tures.In-Kind Expend¡tûres - Are the use of resources of the approved applicant or approved project partnerfor the devefopment or implementation of the appr:oved project. For example, the use of meeting roomsowned by the applicant or approved partner can be an in-kind expenditure.Program & Application Guides - Are the application and program mater¡als prepared by UBCM todescribe the program and assist appticants in compfeting and submitting an appl¡cation. All Program &Appl¡cat¡on Guides are available at www.ubcm.cð.

2. Eligible & lneligible Costs

Eligible costs, including cash and in-kind expenditures, are direct costs properly and reasonably incurred bythe approved appl¡cant or approved partners in the development or implementation of the approved project.To be eligible, these costs must be outlined in the detailed budget submitted by the approved applicant aspart of the application process and be approved by UBCM. Requests to change the budget must be made toUBCM, in writ¡ng, by the approved applicant (see below). Please see the Program & Application Guide forspec¡fic notes regarding eligible and ineliqible costs.

3. Post-Approval Terms

Notice of ApprovalUBCM will inform approved applicants by letterand a specified percentage of the approved grant amount willbe forwarded upon approval. The balance will be paid on satisfactory complet¡on of the project and receiptof all final reporting requ¡rements_

Appl¡cant ResponsibilitiesLGPS grants are awarded to approved applicants. When collaborative projects are undertaken, the approvedappl¡cant remains the primary organization responsible for the grant. Due to this, the approved applicant isthe primary contact for UBCM and is responsible for:

' Ensuring that approved activ¡ties are undertaken as outlined in the approved appfication and within therequired timeline,

' Providing proper fiscal management of the grant and approved project (see below), and

Local Government Program serv¡ces - General Funding Terms & conditions (May 2011) Page 1/2

A15

' Submitting progress and/or final reports, using UBCM forms where available, as required by the Program& Application Guide (see below).

Account¡ng RecordsAcceptable account¡ng records must be kept that clearly disclose the nature and amounts of cash and in-kindexpenditures incurred during the development or implementation of the approved project. Financialsummaries are required to be submitted as part of the final report and must be signed by a representative ofthe approved applicant (or as required in the Program & Application Guide). In all cases, the fÌnal projèctexDend¡ture must be net of any rebates (such as HST) that the approved appl¡cant or approved oartner iselioible to receive.

Ghanges to or Cancellation of Approved ProjectApproved applicants need to advise UBCM, in writing. of any significant var¡ation from the approved projectas described in the approved application, including any major changes to:

' Start or end dates . Project purposer goals, outcomes or milestones. Cash and in-kind expend¡tures or matching . Project partners

funds (when required)

UBCM's approval may be required in advance for such changes. If an approved project is cancelled, theapproved applicant ¡s respons¡ble for ensuring any grant moilies that have been adv¿nced are returned toUBCM within 30 days, or as outlined in the Program & Application Guide.

4. ReportingRequirements

Submission of ReportsApproved applicants are required to submít progress and final reports as outlined ¡n the program &Application Guide. When UBCM forms are available. thev are required to be used. Please note the followinqwhen submitt¡ng a report:

' When completing a UBCM report form please ensure that each question is answered and that allattachments are complete. Follow any sample tempfates that UBCM provides.

' When a report form is not required, please ensure that each required component. as outlined in theProgram & Application Guide, is addressed in your report and that all attachments are complete.

' Unless specificallv requested, please do not bind reports or submit in binders or folders.. When submitt¡ng electron¡cally, submit all documents as Word or pDF files.

' All digital photos or ¡mages should be submitted, by e-mail or on CD. as IPEG files.

' When you are ready to submit your report, please e-mail it directly to [email protected] or mail/fax ¡t toLocal Government House: 525 Government Street, Victoria, BC, VBV 0AB or Fax: (250) 356-5119

Extensions and Outstand¡ng ReportsIn order for an approved project to cont¡nue past the approved end date - or for a final report to besubmitted after the established deadline - approved applicants must contact LGPS and request and begranted permission for an extension.

Approved appl¡cants that do not request extensions and have outstand¡ng reports may forfeit the finalpayment of their grant and may not be eligible to apply to future LGPS programs until reports are received.

5. Recognition of Funding and Funders

Approved applicants should contact UBCM for more informat¡on on recogniz¡ng funding and for informat¡onon the appropr¡ate use of logos. Please contact Paul Taylor, Relationships & Communicat¡ons Advisor, ar(250) 356-2938 or [email protected].

Local Government Program Services - General Funding Terms & Cond¡t¡ons (May 2011) Page 2/2

A16

lnformation on theRegional

"lt is the age-old concept of give

and take, compromise, respectfulness

and treating each other as equals

that creates the framework for

successful relationships and countless

opportunities for future partnerships."

- Participant

Questions?

lf you have any questions about applyingfor a Regional Community to CommunityForum, please contact UBCM:

Local Government Program Services

Union of BC Municipalities

Fhone; (250) 356-5134

E-mal: lgps@ubcm,ca

TJffiÜffi]$r '. *L

Communityto

ComrnunityForum

Program

Frnsr Nnrro¡¡s SuMMrr

A17

"Each event lessens tþe distance betweenthe communities, which physically are

very near to each othrtir; Úut sometimessocially are veiy distant."

- Particioant

DescriptionA regional Community to Community(C2C) Forum is a jointly organized meeting

that brings together First Nation and local

government elected officials and other

community leaders.

Background

Since 1999, with continued support fromthe provincial Ministry of Community,Sport & Cultural Development and

Aboriginal Affairs & NorthernDevelopment Canada, more than 340

Regional C2C Forums have been held incommunities across the province.

This year, UBCM and the FNS have

received funding for the purpose ofproviding modest grants to First Nationand local government applicants.

Purpose

The goal of a regional C2C Forum is toincrease understanding and to improve

.l

overali relâtiöns betWeeri First Ñations

and local governments. Dialogue topics

may include econornic development, land

use planning, service delivery or other

areas of common interest.

Forum Objectives

o Educating and'ihforming participants

about relationships between First

Nations and local go-verriments

o Providing a forum for dialogue on a

specific concern cir topical issue

o Strengthening relqtionships and

fostering coope¡ation by buildingstronger links between First Nations

and local governments

o Determining opportunities for futurecollaboration and ioint action.

Who is eligible?Any local government (municipality orregional district) or First Nation

government (Band or Tribal Council) may

apply for funding for a regional C2C

Forum. First time and.repeat applicants

are eligible.

Approval f;¡gcessThe FNS and UBCM hope to encourage as

many C2C forums as possible across theprovince, within the confines of theavailable funding. Each year more

applications are received and, if need be,

steps wiil be taken to ensure funds are

spread as far: as possible:

Consolidation - ln some cases, where

several forums are proposed in the same

region, we may ask that the groups

combine efforts and hold one forum forthat region.

Regional Equity - Consideration will be

given to ensuring regional equity in theallocation of funds.

Advice - Where requested, UBCM and FNS

will provide advice to applicants on theirapplication and event.

"l cannot recall being involved in anythingmore significant in my career. Buildingpeoples' futures rather than building

'things' is much more satisfying".

- Participant

A18

\tr'3 g l'*'j.oj g-,, å.{ }¡l ä'f }¡:þi å ã }å;)N'å'S ,.åþiþi{}{ låå'Ë-f {}-\

3 3724 Wh¡le Leko Road

î $o$ånto BC VOË?w1

å 25Ð"8S5-8583

Ë Ëtìeverßguìí!il.rom

6/25/2013

Paul Demenok

Area C DirectorCSRD

Salmon Arm BC.

DearMr. Demenok.

As you are aware, the WLRA has had several meetings with BCTS overthe last few months regarding harvestproposals,thathavebeenpresentedtotheWhiteLakeCommunity. Asyouarealsoaware,ourfirctexperience with BCTS, was a bit difficult. Noting, that we have recently completed a second, in-depthprocess with BTCS, we have found that consultation and meaningful discussions, have not only improved,along w¡th our relationship, we also feel that BTCS has shown considerable interest with the "communitiesconcems" and shows a "genuine" willingness to address issues that are brought foruard to them. The WLRA

feels that, many valuable changes have been made, forthe benefit of the Communig. We also feel that thesechanges would not have accrued, at least, not the volume of changes, if the White Lake community, didnot have a Residents Association to work on these important issues. The WLRA looks forward to thecontinuance of assisting our community in the future, with issues of importance. As a result of the lastconsultation process with BCTS, the WLRA is actively working on two issues that the community deems,"important." The issue of a Moratorium within the White Lake watershed, has been herd loud and clear. lt isunderstoodbytheWLRA,thatpartofthe populationofthecommunig,hasaconcernaboutthefutureharvestingwithin thewatershed and feelsthatan effort, to have an application approved, thatwill designatea watershed title, to White Lake is a very important attempt. Although this round of harvest is imminent, theWLRA is in discussion with the Minister of Forests, to grant the WLRA with a 3- 5 year moratorium. lf granted,

thiswill allow, the needed time, that has been requested byothergroups and individuals, to conductwhatinvestigations they feel necessary t0 achieve the goals of a Community Watershed. The second issue that theWLRA is attempting to address, is the issue of heavy traffic on the White Lake road. There are concerns of thecondition of the road, speed of some vehicles and noise from some vehicles. BCTS has agreed to fonrvard aletterofsuppottto Highways,toconductdiscussionswiththeWLRAregardingthementionedmatterc.TheWLRA is seeking your support on this issue, by also forwarding a letter of support, from yourself as ourAreaDirector andl orthe CSRD, with consent from the majority of all Area Directors.We thank you foryour time regarding our request and awaityourtimely response.

Thankyou from the executive of the WLRA.

Sincerely,Bryon Every,

president.

A19

carolyn

Typewritten Text

AC3

From:Sent:To:Cc:

Subject:

Director MartinJune-26-L3 10:L2 AMDirector Revelstoke

[email protected]; Director Sicamous;

Morgan; Director Parker; Director Demenok;

Charles Hamilton; Carolyn Black

Agenda Item

Christina Benty; Director Talbot; Director

Director HabarU Director Salmon Arm 2',

Good Morning Dave,

Could you please place this request on our July Board Agenda.

Since the last SLIPP meeting held in Sicamous there has been much discussion around the next steps.

At this time I would like to request that access be given to feasibility study funds to explore the feasibility of SLIPP. What it

should be or if it should be and who and how it will be paid for.

The study would require a fresh set of eyes and would include all of the local governments that are involved at this time, that

being the CSRD, TNRD and NORD.

Thank you for your consideration of this request,

Director Rhona MartinArea E Columbia Shuswap Regional DistrictBox 978Salmon Arm, B.C.

vLE-4P1Home Phone 250-836-4509

Cell Phone 250-5L7 -947 1.

A21

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BG1

1.

Hi Charles,

Thanks very much for your memo of June 24 regarding the steps that will need to be taken to establishSLIPP, or its successor, as a regional district service. I think you have raised some very importantquestions and issues that will definitely need to be addressed. I agree that we may need a formal studyto evaluate all of the options and to chart out the most appropriate course of action with respect togovernance and funding. ln addition to the governance and funding questions you have raised, I thinkwe have another important series of questions to be addressed around vision and strategic direction.Given these many unknowns, I would ask that this matter be added to the agenda for the upcoming EAD

meeting on July 11'h.

I would propose that the following action plan be discussed/improved/approved at the EAD session:

Step L-Visioning and Strategic DirectionAt the last SLIPP Steering Committee Meeting we achieved an agreement in principle to support a

successor to SLIPP which focussed on Water Quality and Safety. I believe that before any fundingpartner can legitimately discuss future governance or funding allocations, we first need to jointlydevelop a common shared vision of what this new body will have as its strategic objectives and goals.

What is this thing going to be? "Water Quality" and "Safety" may or may not have the same meanings toall of the Steering Committee members. I think we need to nail down these definitions and what thenew body will or will not do before we talk about governance or funding. I believe that the strategicdirection for SLIPP must be established with the inputs and consents of all funding partners, and all

other partners as well. We should be very inclusive in this process.

Given this, I think the first step should be the involvement of a knowledgeable, skilled, consultant whocan facilitate a special input session with the SC to elicit and create the shared vision of SLIPP. I think thissession can be funded from existing budgets within SLIPP. I think this should be done as soon as possible

so that when any of us makes reference to the future of SLIPP, we're all talking about the same thing.Two candidates have been nominated by others to act as the consultant for this step. I plan to meetwith each of them very soon, and hope to have a recommendation in time for the EAD meeting.

Step 2-Confirmation of PartnersIt has been suggested that we should take the necessary steps to confirm the ongoing participation of all

of the provincial agencies in whatever program succeeds SLIPP. This can initiated with a series of lettersaimed at the appropriate senior level within each agency.There have also been discussions about bringing in new partners to the program, including RDNO,

Chase, Shuswap River and Salmon River watershed groups, and the Ministry of Agriculture. Again, once

the Vision and Strategic Direction are articulated, they can be communicated via these letters to allpotential new partners.

Step 3-Evaluation and Selection of Governance ModelThis step more directly addresses the questions in your memo of June 24'h. lt is appropriate that theCSRD can and should take the lead in this regard, and I would support your recommendation that theCSRD hiring a consultant to guide us towards the best model to satisfy all concerns and issues. This mayor may not be the same consultant as is involved with the strategic planning project suggested above,although that would be ideal.A key benefit we have is the opportunity to evaluate the Okanagan Basin Water Board model moreclosely. I believe that the presentation made by Nelson Jatel at the last SC meeting was quite impressive,and there appeared to be a number of similarities to the SLIPP scenario.OBWB has a fully detailed governance booklet published on their website. Given the similarities ofinvolvement with multiple regional districts and munícipalities, evaluating the OBWB model makes the

2.

3.

A22

4.

most sense at this point, particularly as their model has now set the precedents and it deals veryspecifically with extraterritoriality and funding.We can certainly use the best and most applicable parts of the OBWB governance model, and then,customize the gaps as needed.Please note that the OBWB does receive both Federal and Provincial grant support, so they are notentirely funded through regional/m u nicipa I taxation.Should we decide to go with the OBWB model, the CSRD should take the lead in achieving the needed

legislation. There will be a series of other steps needed and described from the work of the consultant,and this will set up a separate flowchart of events for the governance part of this.

Step 4-Funding the Transition PeriodIt is clear from your comments that there is insufficient time to implement the necessary bylaws tosupport a taxation-funded scheme in time to smoothly transition from the end of the pilot program inMarch 2Ot4,forward.Rene Talbot has proposed that we utilize the L0% All Electoral Areas portion of the Gas Tax fund, to fundthe transition period. Areas C, D E and F, would account for around 75% or so of the assessment pool ofthe CSRD, so funding to this proportion from this pool would provide interim relief to the electoral areas

now paying disproportionate amounts. The remaining amounts would be funded from each specificElectoralArea fund. I would be happy to have you and PeterJarman develop the exact fundinga llocations.It is proposed that the interim funding period would run from April 1 ,2014 to March 37,20L5, at whichpoint we would plan to have all needed governance and funding agreements in place. This may be an

overly optimistic timeframe, but we should be able to adjust accordingly depending upon the progress

on the governance side, and if needed, the gas tax funding as proposed could continue for two years

from existing budgets.

Step 5-Funding AllocationsThis might be the most challenging step of all. Again, I would agree that it may be quite helpful and

appropriate to involve an external consultant to evaluate the options, and to provide us with specificrecommendations in this regard.At the end of the day, each funding partner will need to have their respective councils/boards approvethe funding and governance models.

Step 6-Elector Approva I

It seems to me that the ideal timing for a region-wide referendum would be during the planned

elections in the fall of 20t4.I wonder if the Directors would agree to letting the public decide whether the post-SLIPP program

should be at least partially funded through taxation. We can certainly discuss this further at the EAD

session.

I hope this memo has been helpful. I look forward to collaborating with you and the Board to help move

this program forward.Thanks very muchCheers

Paul DemenokCSRD Area C Director

5.

6.

A23

From: Charles HamiltonSent: Monday, June 24,2013 11:08 AMTo: Director Demenok; Mike SimpsonCc: Director Morgan; Director Salmon Arm 1; Director Salmon Arm 2; Director Sicamous; Director Talbot;Director Martin; David Raven {External}Subject: RE: Some next steps

Good Morning Director Demenok:

I have been reflecting on the meeting that we had the other day about the steps that need to be taken toestablish SLIPP as a regional district service. Given the complexity of this initiative, I think it may beworthwhile to request the Board for access to the feasibility fund to undertake a formal study of the proposedservice. The purpose of the study would be to address the following issues:

1. Because the service involves several CSRD jurisdictions, what are the options available for the fairallocation of costs?

2. Under current legislation, regional districts can provide services outside their boundaries(extraterritoriality). The legislation is not designed, however, to enable multi-regional service deliveryand partnerships without one of the regions acting as the dominant partner. ln the case of SLIPP, I

presume that the CSRD would be the dominant partner, but how do we go about formalizing theparticipation of the two neighbouring regional districts (i.e., TNRD and NORD)?

3. Putting aside the issue of extraterritoriality, we still need to determine which jurisdictions within theCSRD wish to participate. ls there sufficient support among elected officials to pay for the service on afair and equitable basis? ls the Board prepared to compel an area to participate even if the ElectoralArea Director is not supportive. Section 801.5 of the Local Governmenf Acf provides for this, but itdoes require a2l3vole.

4. How will the service be managed?5. How will formal approval of the electors be obtained? By referendum, counter petitíon, etc.6. What type of service withdrawal provisions should be included in the establishment bylaw?7. ls there a transition plan for the next year or two?8. How does the potential evolution of SLIPP tie into suggestions about setting up a Shuswap Lake Water

Board? Should we be seeking some type of legislative changes that would allow for such a multiregional partnership.

Formalizing SLIPP as an established service of the regional district will be a complex and challengingundertaking. This is not an initiative that can realistically be done off the side of my desk. When you havetime, I would be pleased to discuss these questions with you in more detail.

Charles HamiltonChief Administrative Officer

Columbia-Shuswap.tfReglonal.Dlstrictff

781 Marine Park Drive NEBox 978Salmon Arm, B.C. V1E 4P1Tel: 250.832-8194Toll Free: 1.888.248.2773

A24

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Gary Holte, ManagerEnvironment and Engineering Services

File No: 0810 20 040810 20 14

Date: July 2,2013

Policy No. A-62 'Electronic Sign Boards - Recreation Facilities'

THAT:the Board approve the inclusion of Electronic Sign Board - RecreationFacilities Policy A-62 into the CSRD Policy Manual.

APPROVED for Board Consideration: QLAMeeting Date: Juty 18,2013 @

t( -

SHORT SUMMARY:

The CSRD, in partnership with its member municipalities, has acquired electronic sign boards as acommunication medium for the Recreation Centres in Golden and Sicamous. The purpose of thispolicy is to confirm the agency responsible for posting messages, confirm the eligibility oforganizations (other than local government) to post messages and to provide parameters formessaging on an electronic sign board.

VOTING:Unweighted !Corporate

WeightedCorporate

Stakeholder n(Weighted)

tr

BACKGROUND:

The electronic sign boards were approved by the Board during the 2012 and 2013 budget processes.Staff is proposing that the CSRD adopt a policy that encourages utilization of the electronic signboards by non-profit groups from within the community. The policy will empower the agencies whichcurrently manage and operate the recreation facitilies to adopt their own procedures for the posting ofmessages on the electronic sign boards.

The CSRD has solicited comments on the draft policy from the District of Sicamous, the Sicamous &District Recreation Society and the Town of Golden.

FINANCIAL:

There will be no cost for non-profit groups in the relevant community to use the electronic sign boards.

KEY ISSUES/CONCEPTS:

The proposed policy will provide clear direction to both the Sicamous & District Recreation Societyand the Town of Golden on the utilization of the electronic sign boards, and will provide opportunity fornon-profit groups to advertise their community events.

Page 1 of 2

A25

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BG2

3.

4.

BOARD REPORT Policy A-62 Electronic Sign Board - Recreation Facilities July 18,2013

IMPLEMENTATION:

The Sicamous & District Recreation Society and the Town of Golden will develop procedures for non-profit groups in each respective community to post messages on the electronic sign boards.

LrsT NAME OF REPORT(S) / DOCUMENT(S):

DESIRED OUTGOMES:

The Board approve Policy A-62 Electronic Sign Board - Recreation Facilities.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse the Recommendation

2. Deny the Recommendation

Defer

Any other action deemed appropriate by the Board

GOMMUNIGATIONS:

Policy A-62 will be incorporated into the CSRD Policy Manual and copies will be foruvarded to theTown of Golden, the District of Sicamous and the Sicamous & District Recreation Society.

1. Policy A-62 "Electronic Sign Board - RecreationFacilities"

REVIEWED BY: Date Signed Off(MO/DD/YR) Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or Deputy Manager

Environment &Enqineering Services J*h-l 3 ^^q3 ."--------> c! - --t-

Page 2 of 2

A26

POLICY A-62

Electronic Sisn Boards - Recreation Facilities

Preamble

The CSRD has acquired electronic sign boards as a communication medium for theRecreation Facilities in Golden and Sicamous. This policy authorizes the agency responsiblefor posting messages; confirms the eligibility of organizations (other than local government) topost messages; and provides parameters for messaging on an electronic sign board.

Policv

The agency that holds the current contract for the management and operation of the recreationfacility will be responsible for posting messages to the electronic sign board. The procedure forposting messages on electronic sign boards will be at the discretion of the contracted agency.

The Electronic Sign Board will be available to the following organizations:

Eligible non-municipal groups must be registered non-profit organizations that:

(a) are physically located within the Municipality or Electoral Area which contributes to thesubsidy of the Recreation Facility; and

(b) primarily provides services to residents of the Municipality or Electoral Area as per (a)above. Eligible organizations are not subject to any message fees.

Non-eligible groups include commercial organizations, for-profit businesses, faith basedorganizations, private individuals, politicians (elected or campaigning) and political parties.

Related government or non-profit organizations (i.e. other municipalities, other Regional Districts,the Province of BC, etc.) may be permitted messaging access based on the relevancy of themessage to the local residents on a message-by-message basis (i.e. major community or regionalevents, etc.)

The name of a commercial organization may be displayed in an electronic advertisement incircumstances where the commercial organization is sponsoring the event to be advertised and theevent qualifies for messaging on the electronic sign board, based on the criteria outlined in thispolicy.

A27

ELECTRONIC SIGN BOARDS - RECREATION CENTRES A-62

All messages must comply with the laws, statutes, regulations and bylaws in force within the CSRDand the relevant member municipality. All messages must conform to the principles underlying theCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and in particular must be:

(a) free of any demeaning, derogatory, exploitive or unfair comment or representation ofany person or group of persons; and

(b) free of any demeaning, derogatory, exploitive, or unfair comment or representationbased on race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin, creed, religious affiliation, sex, sexualorientation, disability, age, marital, or family status.

JULY 2013

Columbia Shuswap Regional District

A28

TO:

FROM:

SUBJEGT:

RECOMMENDATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Carolyn Black, Deputy ManagerCorporate Adm i n istration Services

File No: BL 5663BL 5664

Date: July 8,2013

Seymour Arm Electric Power Service Area Establishment & LoanAuthorization Referendum and Appointment of Ghief and DeputyChief Election Officers

THAT:a referendum be held on September 28, 2013 to obtain the elector'sopinion on the establishment of the Seymour Arm electric power servicearca and loan authorization for capital financing of electric powerdistribution line construction within the community of Seymour Arm;

AND THAT:$7,500 be allocated from the rural feasibility study fund to conduct thereferendum.

THAÏ:Carolyn Black be appointed Chief Election Officer and Colleen Goodeybe appointed Deputy Chief Election Officer for the purposes ofconducting the referendum on the proposed establishment of theSeymour Arm electric power service area and loan authorization.

4APPROVED for Board Gonsideration: ó4 /#,*Meeting Date: July 18, 2013 Charles Hamilton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

At its May 16, 2013 regular meeting, the Board gave three readings to Bylaw Nos. 5663 and. 5664(establishment of a service area and the authorization to borrow funds for capital financing ofinstallation of hydro lines within the community of Seymour Arm). The lnspector of Municipalities hasgiven statutory approval for the bylaws allowing the referendum process to officially begin.

VOTING:Unweighted XCorporate

WeightedCorporate


n

Page 1 of 3

A29

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BG3

Board Report Seymour Arm Electrification July 18,2013

"oTHER VOT|NG" (REFERENDUM) TNFORMATTON :

Proposed Schedule For Referendum:

Advanced Voting Opportunity September 18,2013 CSRD OfficeGeneral Voting September 28,2013 Seymour Arm Community Hall

Mail ln Ballot Votinq:

Electors may request a mail in ballot commencing September 3, 2013.

Voter Eliqibility:

Persons who meet the following qualifications are entitled to vote at a referendum:o l8 years of age or older;. Canadian citizen;. Resident of BC for at least 6 months immediately before voting day. Resident of or registered owners of real property in the proposed service area for at least 30 daysimmediately before voting day;. ln the case of non-resident property electors (those who live elsewhere in BC but own property inthe service area), if there is more than one individual who is the registered owner of the property,only one of those individuals may register as a non-resident property elector. The personregistering must do so with the written consent of the majority of the owners.

Corporations are not permitted to vote.

Requirement for the Referendum to Pass:

For a referendum to be successful, a majority of the votes counted as valid must be in favour of thebylaws (50% + 1 of the people who vote must mark the "YES" box on their ballots).

POLICY:

Section 41 (1) of the Local Government Act requires that the Board appoint a chief election officerand a deputy chief election officer.

General Local Government Election and Other Voting Bylaw No. 5661 allows for the use of mail inballots for those eligible electors who are unable to attend a voting opportunity due to a physicalimpairment, an expected absence or who reside in a remote location.

FINANGIAL:

Referendumcostsareestimatedtobe$7,500andwillbeallocatedfromtheruralfeasibilitystudyfund. The referendum costs include advertising, polling station rentals, election official remuneration '

for voting day, printing (ie: ballots, mail in ballot envelopes, signage, voting/registration books).

lf the referendum is successful, the feasibility study funds expended for the proposed service(referendum costs) will be included in the first year's budget for the new function.

Page 2 of 3

A30

Board Report Seymour Arm Electrification July 18,2013


lssues relating to project management, additional funding, etc. will continue to be addressed by staffand BC Hydro up to the referendum date.

A communications program will be implemented over the next few months and a public informationmeeting will be held during the summer to provide all information to electors prior to the referendum.

lf the referendum is successful, the annual contribution for debt retirement for the proposed servicewill be recovered through assessment of a parcel tax on each property within the service area. Asauthorized by Section 202 (3) of the Community Charter, the parcel tax will be based on the physicalcharacteristics of each parcel (that being the number of residential, commercial and industrialstructures located on each parcel). A separate parcel tax bylaw will be presented to the Board forconsideration if the initiative is successful and the service area is established.

IMPLEMENTATION:

Official notices for voting (purpose, location, dates and times), volunteer scrutineers applications, mailin ballot opportunity, etc will commence in mid-August.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



Defer


3.

4.

LrsT NAME OF REPORT(S) / DOGUMENT(S):

1. Seymour Arm Electric Power Service AreaEstablishment Bylaw No. 5663

Attached toAgenda Summary:

nAvailable from

Staff:lx

2. Seymour Arm Electric Power Loan AuthorizationBylaw No, 5664


t-t

Available fromStaff:X

Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or Deputy Manager

Page 3 of 3

A31

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Garolyn Black, Deputy ManagerCorporate Administration Services

File BL 5665No:

Date: July 8, 2013

Malakwa Resource Facility Financial Contribution ServiceArea Establishment Referendum and Appointment of Chiefand Deputy Chief Election Officers

THAT:a referendum be held on September 28, 2013 to obtain the elector'sopinion on the establishment of the Malakwa resource facility contributionservice area;

AND THAT:$7,500 be allocated from the rural feasibility study fund to conduct thereferendum.

THAT:Carolyn Black be appointed Chief Election Officer and Colleen Goodeybe appointed Deputy Chief Election Officer for the purposes ofconducting the referendum on the proposed establishment of theMalakwa Resource Facility Contribution Service Area.

APPROVED for Board Consideration: e 4-Meeting Date: July 18, 2013 Charles Hamilton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

At its May 16, 2013 regular meeting, the Board gave three readings to Bylaw No. 5665 that wouldestablish a service area to allow for an annual contribution toward the cost of operating a resourcefacility within the community of Malakwa. The lnspector of Municipalities has given statutory approvalfor the bylaws allowing the referendum process to officially begin.

VOTING:Unweighted XCorporate

WeightedCorporate


tr

Page 1 of3

A33

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BG4

Board Report Malakwa Resource Facility July 18, 2013

"OTHER VOTING" (REFERENDUM) TNFORMATTON :

Proposed Schedule For Referendum:

Advanced Voting OpportunityGeneral Voting

Mail ln Ballot Votinq:

September 18,2013 CSRD OfficeSeptember 28,2013 Malakwa fire hall (tentative)

Electors may request a mail in ballot commencing September 3, 2013.

Voter Eliqibilitv:

Persons who meet the following qualifications are entitled to vote at a referendum:. 18 years of age or older;. Canadian citizen;. Resident of BC for at least 6 months immediately before voting day. Resident of or registered owners of real property in the proposed service area for at least 30 daysimmediately before voting day;. ln the case of non-resident property electors (those who live elsewhere in BC but own property inthe service area), if there is more than one individual who is the registered owner of the property,only one of those individuals may register as a non-resident property elector. The personregistering must do so with the written consent of the majority of the owners.

Corporations are not permitted to vote.

Requirement for the Referendum to Pass:

For a referendum to be successful, a majority of the votes counted as valid must be in favour of thebylaws (50% + 1 of the people who vote must mark the "YES" box on their ballots).

POLICY:

Section 41 (1) of the Local Government Act requires that the Board appoint a chief election officerand a deputy chief election officer.

General Local Government Election and Other Voting Bylaw No. 5661 allows for the use of mail inballots for those eligible electors who are unable to attend a voting opportunity due to a physicalimpairment, an expected absence or who reside in a remote location.

FINANGIAL:

Referendum costs are estimated to be $7,500 and will be allocated from the rural feasibility studyfund. The referendum costs include advertising, polling station rentals, election official remunerationfor voting day, printing (ballots, mail in ballot envelopes, signage, voting/registration books).

lf the referendum is successful, the feasibility study funds expended for the proposed service(including the earlier feasibility study and the referendum) will be included in the first year's budget forthe new function.

Page 2 of 3

A34

Board Report Malakwa Resource Facility July 18,2013


Since the Malakwa elementary school closure in June 2010, the facility has been used as a privateschool (Malakwa Learning Academy), resource centre, post office and community library. Theconsultant who carried out the feasibility study for possible acquisition of this surplus school facilityprovided a proposed policy addressing community property acquisition. This policy will be presentedto the Board at a later meeting.

lf service area establishment is approved by the electors and if the Board adopts a policy supportingacquisition of surplus community property, the Regional District will finalize negotiations with SchoolDistrict 83 to enter into a lease for the facility. The lease period would allow time to better evaluate theneed for the service, the Regional District's participation in the service and the ongoing capacity forfinancial support.

IMPLEMENTATION:

Official notices for voting (purpose, location, dates and times), volunteer scrutineers applications, mailin ballot opportunity, etc will commence in mid-August.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



Defer


3.

4.


1. Malakwa Resource Facility Financial ContributionService Area Establishment Bylaw No. 5665

REVIEWED BY: Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or Deputy Manager

Page 3 of 3

A35

TO:

FROM:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Peter JarmanManager, Financial Services

File No: 1850 20

Date: July 4,2013

SUBJECT: Grant-in-Aid Requests

RECOMMENDATION: THAT:the Board approve the following allocations from the 2013 electoral grant-in-aids:

Area BTrout Lake Vol. Fire Department $3,000

Area GWhite Lake Recreational Society $5,500

APPROVED for Board Consideration:

Meeting Date: July 18,2013L 4- d-^-- l,

Charles Hamilton. CAO

VOTING:Unweighted nCorporate

WeightedCorporate

Stakeholder !(Weighted)

a

POLICY:

These requests meet the requirements of Policy F-30, approved by the respective Area Director andrequired source documentation has been received. They are within the Electoral Area's grant-in-aidbudget.

DESTRED OUTCOME(S):

That the Board endorse the recommendation.

Page 1 of 2

A37

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BBA1

BOARD REPORT Grant-in-aid July 18, 2013

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. EndorseRecommendatian

2. Any other action deemed appropriate by the Baard

COMMUNIGATIONS:

The respective Electoral Director will advise each organization of the Board's decision. Successfulorganizations will be sent a cheque accompanied with a congratulatory letter.

Page 2 of 2

A38

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Darcy Mooney, Deputy ManagerEngineering & Environmental Services

File No: 72OO 34 01

Date: June27,2013

Electoral Area 'D' Gommunity Works Fund

THAT:in accordance with Policy No. F-3, access to the Electoral Area 'D'Community Works Fund be approved in the amount of $15,000 from theElectoral Area 'D' Community Works Fund allocation in order to insulate theservice bays at the Ranchero Fire hall building.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration:Meeting Date: July 18, 2013

/,Charles Hamilton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

Two capital projects have been approved in the 2013 budget for the Ranchero Fire Hall; theinstallation of an exhaust removal system and the installation of a ready rack system. Theseprojects are ready to move fon¡vard. The Ranchero Fire Chief and the Fire Services Coordinatorhave investigated the opportunity to insulate the heated service bays before the installation of thesecapital initiatives commence. The service bays currently have no insulation, which results in thebuilding being far less energy efficient. lnsulating the services bays will result in a decrease toheating costs and reductions in carbon emissions.

VOTING: Unweighted Corporate n Weighted Corporate ! Stakeholder n(Weightedl

BACKGROUND:

During the planning and preparation to have the exhaust removal system and the ready racksystems installed at the fire hall, staff received advice that the application of insulation to thecurrently un-insulated portion of the building should be completed before these projects movefonryard. lnsulating the service bays prior to installation of the exhaust system and ready racks, willsave in excess of $3500, compared to completing the insulating at a later date, after the exhaust andrack systems have been installed. The Electoral Area 'D' Director supports the insulation of theservice bays with funds from the ElectoralArea 'D' Community Works Fund allocation.

POLIGY:

Policy No. F-3 "Community Works Fund - Expenditure of Monies" states that the expenditure ofmonies from the Community Works fund will be ratified by the Board.

Page 1 of2

A39

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BBA2

BOARD REPORT ElectoralArea 'D' Works Fund June 27. 2Q13

FINANCIAL:

All required funding to insulate the service bays will come from the Electoral Area 'D' CommunityWorks Fund.

KEY rSSUE(SyCONCEPT(S):

To secure the funding necessary to insulate the truck service bays at the Ranchero Fire hall, helpingto reduce heating costs and carbon emissions of the building. The flexibility to secure funding fromthe Area 'D' Community Works Fund enables the insulation to be installed cost effectively prior to theinstallation of the approved 2013 capital projects.

IMPLEMENTATION:

lf approved, the insulation upgrade will be completed prior to installation of the exhaust removalsystem and the ready rack system.

DESTRED OUTCOME(S):

The Board approve the expenditure of $15,000 from the ElectoralArea ,D' Community Works Fund inorder to complete this project.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



3. Defer

4. Any other action deemed appropriate by the Board


Environment andEngineering Services J*Lì 3 }.¡òt,B ------> "t---€Finance & lnformationTechnology Services

Page 2 of 2

A40

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Terry LangloisWater Services Coordinator

File No: 5600 03 02

Date: July 5, 2013FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

Anglemont Estates Water System Upgrade Award

THATthe Board empower the authorized signatories to enter into an agreementwith Mierau Contractors Ltd. to construct and commission, as designed, theAnglemont Estates Water Treatment Plant, Lake intake/pumping system,booster station and reservoir upgrades for a total cost of $2,557,643 plusapplicable taxes.

APPROVED for Board Consideration: +//æ /,Meeting Date: July 18. 2013

charles Hamitton. cAo

SHORT SUMMARY:

fn June 2013, the CSRD issued a Select lnvitation to Quote for the construction of the watertreatment plant, lake intake system, booster station and reservoir upgrades of the Anglemont WaterSystem.

VOTING: Unweighted Corporate tr Weighted Corporate n Stakeholder n(Weighted)

BACKGROUND:

As part of the ongoing upgrade project, the construction of the water treatment ptant, lakeintake/pumping system, booster station and reservoir upgrades as designed for the AnglemontEstates Water System, was put out in a select lnvitation to Quote process. Three (3) firms submittedbids in response to this quote and as portions of this project are very specialized, all bids werecarefully reviewed with AECOM Engineering. As per the attached recommendation from AECOMEngineering, staff is recommending Mierau Contractors Ltd., the low bid, be awarded the contract.

Proponent PriceMierau Contractors Ltd. $2,557,643True Construction Ltd. $2,597,451Acres Enterprises Ltd. $3,257,105

POLICY:

ln accordance with Policy F-32, Procurement of Goods & Services, which states Board authorizationmust be obtained for any tender or RFP to be awarded in excess of 9500,000.

Page 1 of2

A41

carolyn

Typewritten Text

BBA3

BOARD REPORT Anglemont Estates Water System Upgrade Award July 18, 2013

FINANCIAL:

The recommended proposalfrom Mierau Contractors Ltd. met all criteria and offered the lowest bid.The budget estimate from the CSRD's engineering consultant was $2.9 million for this project, so thelow bid of $2.56 million will enable completion of additional upgrades to the water distributionsystem. All costs associated with this award will be paid through grant funding (General StrategicPriorities Fund).

KEY rSSU E(S/CONCEPT(S):

To ensure the recommended proponent has the necessary experience and skills to complete theproject on time and within budget.

IMPLEMENTATION:

lmmediate upon award.


1. Recommendation from AECoM Engineering Attached to Agenda Available fromSummary: I Staff: n

DESTRED OUTCOME(S):

The Board will approve the recommendation, and award the water upgrade project to the low bidder.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



3. Defer


COMMUNIGATIONS:

The CSRD will sign an Agreement with the successfulfirm and notify the unsuccessful proponents.

REVIEWED BY: Date Signed Off(MO/DD/YR) Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or Deputy Manager

Environmental &Enoineerinq Services J -r¡.ì 1 Àrs 3

-.¡----$Finance & lnformationTechnoloqv Services /-4- I 2 tt3 tu/o / /',

Page 2 of 2

A42

Æcom AECOM201 - 3275 Lakeshore Road 2507623727 tetKelowna,BC,Canada VlW3Sg 2507ø27789 taxl,ì/WW.aOCOm.COm

July 8, 2013

Mr. Terry LangloisWater Services CoordinatorColumbia Shuswap Regional District781 Marine Park Drive NESalmon Arm, BC VlE 4P1

DearTerry:

Proiect: Anglemont Water Treatment Upgrades

RcAardlng: Tendcr Summary and Recommcndatlon of Award

Tenders for the Anglemont Water Treatment Upgrades were received and opened in public atColumbia Shuswap Regional District office on Wednesday, July 3d, 20'13 at 2:00pm. Three tenderswere received. Summaries of the individual tenders ars snclosed with this letter, with all arithmeticchecked. A summary of the Tender results is provided in Table l.

Tablel-TenderResults

AECOM's pre-tender construction cost estimate, including a $ 130,000 contingency allowance was S2,903,000. The contingency amount was equalized to match the construction tender submissions andthe engineering allowance was deleted to obtain the total estimated value of g 2,903,000.

I GeneralRsquiremsnt 363.000 49,413 113.194 68,9002 Civiland Site 400,000 732,000 245,700 373,2003 Architecturaland Structural 690.000 495,000 752.953 746.4204 Process Mechanical ô10.000 390,695 468,300 792,9705 Building Mechanical 80,000 59,300 59.100 68,2006 Electrical&lnstrumentation 630,000 701.235 828,204 1.077.415

SUBTOTAL 2,773,000 2,427,643 2,467,451 3,127,105CONT¡NGENCY 13O.OOO 130.000 130.000 130,000

TOTAL 2.903.000 2,557,643 2.597.451 3.257.105

A- Experience in SimilarWork ./ ./ ./B - Senior Supervisor Staff ./ ''/ ./

C - Tender Price Breakdown 1,, ./ ./

D - Sub-Contractors and Suppliers ./Bid Bond { ./ ./

A43

The cost presented by the contractors all vary, but when comparing the average tender results to theengineering estimate some general comments are:

1. The 2 low tender submissions are roughly $ 300 k or 10% lower than the AECOM pre-tenderestimate. Also, the 2 low tender submissions are very close indicating a clear understandingof the project scope.

2, After reviewing the tenders it appears we over-estimated the generally conditions, overheadand profit. This could partially be due to allocation of these costs within the remainder of thecontract prices. lt also appears that the premium for completing work in Anglemont is lessthan we estimated.

3. Our estimate of electrical, instrumentation and control work was less than the averageTender cost. This is occurred since there is more work than originally expected for the Turn-key contract and limited availability of the local electrical contractors. The low sub-contractorfor this work is Betts Electric, which is based on Penticton. We understand from speakingwith Mierau Contracting Ltd that the local qualified electrical contractors were busy and eitherdid not bid the project or offered higher prices.

There were a couple irregularities noted with the Tender submissions such as not writing the tenderprices in words, but all the irregularities were deemed to be minor. Based on our review of the tenderdocumentation all three tender submissions were complete and acceptable.

Low TenderThe low tender received is from Mierau Contracting Ltd. The majority of the Mierau Contracting teamis known and are experienced with this type of work. Some specific comments about the contractingteam proposed by Mierau for this project is:

1. lnstrumentation and Controls - Betts Electrical: We are familiar with Betts Electrical and theyhave successfully completed several projects with AECOM in the past. Additionally, we haveconfirmed, by telephone conversation with Mierau, that Betts Electrical and Turn-Key areclear about their respective scope of work.

2. Process Mechanical - Absolute lndustrial: We are not familiar with Absolute lndustrial, but wehave been informed that Absolute lndustrial has worked with Mierau Contracting on projectsin the Lower Mainland. Mierau Contracting selected Absolute Mechanical to be part of thisproject given their past project success.

3. Shuswap Lake lntake - River Mist: River Mist is a Kamloops based civil and diving contractorthat will complete the Shuswap Lake intake upgrade. We are not familiar with this contractor,but we have been informed that they have certified divers and have completed similarprojects in the past.

All the other sub-contractors being proposed for this project have minor roles or are known to have apositive track record. Mierau Contracting confirmed that they plan to meet the contract SubstantialCompletion date of December 31st, 2013 and intend to mobilize as soon as possible with constructionstarting in the next couple of weeks.

A44

Pago 3

SummaryMierau Contrac-ting Ltd. was a selected tenderer given the expectralion that they could successfullycomplete this assignment. Based on the forgoing analysis, we herein recommond that thc AnglemontWater Treatnent Upgnade bo awarded to the low tender, Mierau Contracting Ltd. in lhe amount of $e56¿043.00 (indudlng $ 130,000 conüngency allowance). Once we receive conlrmaüon of award wewill commence conüact administration procedures.

Sincercly,AECOiI Canada Ltd.

AO:agEnd. Bld Summaryspreâdsheotoc:

Brett deWlnter,

A45

Tablel-TenderSummary

s]:ct'toN t.0 - G¡:N¡:R,\t, R¡:QUt R!:¡\tl:ñ t s. I ¡\f obrhzrhon/D.ù¡obrharron.2 Sirc Ollìccs

-ì St¡({rp ind Conìntisti.nriog.{ (X¡lU iu¡nurls aill llc(ords D¡rsiùSs

'Iolrl 1.0 - Genùr¡l rcrluhcùrcnts

sÌ:ct'roN !.0 - c¡\'il..l Cl.rtrirg, Conilnon E¡car¡t¡r)n ilnd Orrd¡ng

.2 Rold Works ¡ild crid¡tr8

. J W¡rtr Transùìasiiúr If ¡¡trs.t Yrr.l PiIiDS

.i FcilcrnS rnd Lìndscrprng

'for¡l !.0 - clv¡l

sgqfloN 3.0 -sf RUct'uta^¡,¡ WTP (ìoncrcrc

.2 l)oo^. W¡ndù\rs rnil ll¡lch.s

.j Tcùì¡xxil¡y \\1nks

..1 5trucrutul ñfctüls

.5 L¡licshorc Purnp St$non

.ó Rrsùñ0r I StrucNr¡l Upgradùs

.7 lì€scñoir 2 hrrllxnrsc

.3 Rscnorr J Stnrc¡urc Upsrrdas

.9 Nf ¡Jccll¡ùcoui trlct¡ls

Total.l.0 - Strücturâl

sE(:TtoN.t.0 -.\RcÍtTE(f URAL

I \\TP ñlùrotrry

.2 Lak.shorc Ptrilìp Srari(¡r ilfîsonry

.3 Rscß,orr 2 PuorphoilJc ¡tl$onry

.{ RooliIg Il¡tcri¡ls

.j Cl¡(ldhrg ùd l;iilishLr

Torrl¡.0-.\rrhhc{turil

sEciloN 5.0- PROCESS ù¡ECÍ^\ICÅL.l Uv Disiilt¡cl¡(nr UqiliPnrùtrr lnst¡lh0otr.2 ll)Î[cihrr¡rc Eqxrl)nÈnr fnshllôtiotrJ Lrkcsfiorc Pu¡rp Sbt¡on

..1 Pi0ing. l:¡ttings aùd V¡lYcs

Îfîl 5.0 - Pror.{r ñlrchan¡ce¡

s¡:ct'toN 6.0 - Bt,il,t)tNc i\t¡:cll,\ñtc..\t..l Ucrting rm, Vctrtilit¡lu2 Plsmbn8

'torrl ó.0 - l¡olldlng ùlcch¡n¡c.l

Sl:Cl'lON 7.0 - t:l.t:C'rl¡lC,\1,.\r-l) l\S'l'llU\l¡:ñ'f ,\'rloñ.l llfororilild Equrpnrnr Conßol

2 Rtrikling lilcc¡ric¡l

I WTt¡ âil(l W¡¡cr l'S St¡ildhyC€ncrilors.¡ Crbhng ild Trry.i l;¡cld i\l¡sc. f)cv¡ccs. l cnnrnrooos & liqüryilcnr llook.Up.ó ftrslrun¡cnBl¡on

Tol¡l 7.0 - El(clrlc¡l ¡nd fnslrum(nl¡llon

Subjfo(rl

ConllngrÌcy xllo$^rc(

Tcndcr pdca (crcludln* Grl)

€ntlneer's€rtlmate Mlerâu contrâctor ltd. ÍRUE contr¿ctor3 Ltd. aRcEs cohtråator¡ Ltd. Avefate

I 5.000

20,000 s 96,594

5.000 s 12.000

47,365

s 12,000 s 16,100 I 11,033

s 2,500 s r¡,?00 s 9.37rs ro-õ' 3-tjõd' ]-Groo-'

-.g,4oo-'

I 363,000 $ ¿9,¿r3 I 113,194 I 68,900 I 77,169

s 50,000 s 55,200 I t32,0oo s 79,067

t ro,ooo s tt0,500 _s 85,300, s 95.267s 1g?,!q9 s 40,200 5 a7.50o t 93.233

s $!]00q 5 r8,40o s 80.900 s r53,roo5 40,000 S 2r,400 s 27,soo s 29.63f

s 400,000 5 732,000 s 24S,7OOSt73,200S4So.3oo

5 10s,000 s 194.400 s 180,000 s 159,800

s 45,000 s 5s,000 s s4,r@ s sr,36?

lsrs.100s68,30os2?,8@s 40,000 s 12,000 s 33,300 s 28,43ts 35,000 s r8r,500 _æ. 5 82,267

_:_l¡gg _s 3r,300, s 6,320 s 26,873

s 35,000 s 17.0@ s 23,900 s 25,3q)

s 2s,æ0 s 19,000 s 27.000 s 23,667

s-

S 3s,000 S 32,053 S 30,700 S 3z.ss4

I 10,000 _S 16,400, s 18,500 s 14.967

s ¡0,000 s 13,900 9 r3,7oo s ¡2,533s 40,0@ s 68,000 $ r03,ooo s 70,333

s 45,000 s 4?.roo s r4o,ooo s 77,361

140,000 s t77¡53 s 30s,900 3

s 3,200 s 3.800 s 2.880 s 3.293

5 6,090

s ¿t5,0(x)s ?.800

l-.p$gss 265.100

I rs9.85ss 221,140

s 6,797

S 255,48s

S 285,080

5 550,655

369.m192,970

s 45.800 S S4,9@ S 38,800 S 46,500

s r3.s00 s 4.200 s 29,400 s rs,7oo

5 80,000 s s9,300 s 59,100 s 68,200 I 6¿200

s 229.934 S 276,000 S ß3,950 5 2t3,295s 107,492 S 125,?80 S r¿7,675 S r26.8t6S ¡58,83! S 185,760 S 284,900 S 209,69?

s 48,938 S 57,024 S 189,050 S 98,33?s 24,632 S 30,780 S 88,540 S

s r3r,408 S 1s3,360 I 233,700 S 172,823

701,235 s r,o77,415 S 86&951

S 3,r27,ros S 2,674,066

S 13o,0oo S r3o,ooo

I 3,25¿105 5 2.804,066s 2,903,000 s 2,557,6¿3 $ 2,59r,451

5 2.773.000 S 2,a2'r,643 S

s 130,000 s 130,000 s

2,467,4St

130,000

A46

OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY STERILE INSECT RELEASE BOARD1450 KLO Road, Kelowna, BC V1W 324

Tel: 250-469-6187tax: 250-762-7OtI

Toll Free: L-800-363-6684Website: www.oksir.orqEmail: [email protected]

SIR BOARD REPORT:

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD JUNE 21,,2013

Operatíons Update:The 2013 season is well underway w¡th releases of sterile moths in Zone L(south) of the Program area being carriedout as ¡n past years. Multi-Lure mating disruption (CM/LR TT) has been applied as the control being used in Zones2(central) and 3(north). This is the third and final year of the mating disruption trial. Staff are monitoring trapsweekly and the information is being distr¡buted to growers on all trap bottoms, through emails when available andby drop sheet when requested, Use of smartphones with the infield data entry for trap counts is being used in allzones in 2013. The information is also uploaded to the SIR Mapping Website for easy access by growers. Data frompestícide sales for codling moth control indicates that on average requirement for control sprays has droppedsubstantially. lt is estímated on average, in 1996 that 2.6 sprays were required, whereas in 2OII in Zone L, onaverage only 0.23 sprays were required while Zone 2 and 3, only 0.42 sprays were required. Staff continues to workdiligently with the propertíes that are experiencing difficulty controlling codling moth infestation. This is

approximately 8% of the overall Program acreage.

Update from SemiosBio on Decision Aid System Pilot Projed:The SIR Board received an update from the president of SemiosBio, the BC company piloting a wireless decision aidsystem to orchards in the SIR Program service area. The company has received Sgmillion in funding fromSustainable Development Technology Canada to develop and deploy theirtechnology across Canada. ln 2013 and2O'J.4 as part of the pilot project they can offer growers that have applied an opportunity to partícipate in a systemthat can provide automated services such as weather data, trap monitoring, and automated matíng disruptioncontrol. The company is also collaborating with growers in areas of Ontario, Quebec, U5, and ltaly.

I nternotío nal Presentatíons a nd Collaboratíve Opportu n¡tíes:The Board received an update on recent discussions between the General Manager and representatives from theJoint Division of the Food Agriculture Organization (FAO)/lnternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- lnsect PestControl Division and European interests from southwestern France. This group is preparing a feasibility study onimplementing an area-wide IPM program using Sterile lnsect Technology (SlT) as a control measure, modeled afterthe SIR Program. As well, representatives work¡ng with ltalian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy andSustainable Economic Development (ENEA) and Biotechnology and Biological Control Agency met with the GeneralManager to discuss interest in the SIR Program model, information on achievements of the program and potentialfor pilot collaboration using SIR moths. They indicated that they are in the early stages of considering SIT in theTrentino and South Tyrol regions of ltaly as well as isolated regions in southern ltaly. Currently this area is servedwith mating disruption and pesticide controls. SIT is being considered as a supplemental approach. Prior workthrough the IAEA has established parameters for long distance transport of SIR sterile codling moth for successfuluse. PresentatÍons to the IAEA on the SIR Program were well received by the researchers and scientísts, as anexample of a successful fully implemented area wide program using SlT. The SIR Board has agreed to host aResearch Coordination Meeting in June of 2014 in the Okanagan Valley. This meeting is held by the Joint Division ofthe FAO/IAEA and attended by international scientists specializing in Lepidoptera (moth) control. As the world'slongest running, most successful area wide program for codling moth control, this is an opportunity to showcasethe 5lR Program locally, nationally and internationally.

Contract with BCFGA for Apple Clean'ving Moth Communlcotíon:BCFGA recently contracted with SlR Program to distribute information on Apple Clearwing Moth control. TheBCFGAhasplanstodevelopapilotprojectonappleclearwingmothcontrol for21l4withindustrypartners. They¡ntend to ask the SIR Board to participate in the pilot on a contracted basis.

Orchard Removals and Admlnlslratíve Rebotes:Planted acreage has been reduced by 183.40 acres and has resulted in the issuance of administrative rebates in theamount of 525,540.28. This is a reduction to Program revenue. This is due to removal of planted host tree acreageafter tax roll has been finalized in February but prior to the start of the Program service delivery.

SIR Board

Voting Members:

Duane 0phus (Chair)Regional District ofCentral 0kanagan

Allan Patton (Vice)

Regional District ofOkanagan Similkameen

Colin BasranRegional District ofCentral 0kanagan

Shirley FowlerRegional District of North

0kanagan

Debbie CannonRegional Dishict ofColumbia Shuswap

Brian MennellGrower Rep - Zone 1

(Organic)

Amarjit LalliGrower Rep -Zone2

Dave DoberniggGrower Rep - Zone 3

Non-voting Members:

Kenna MacKenzieAgriculture & Agri-FoodCanada

Susanna AcheampongBC Ministry of Agricultureand Lands

The next regularmeeting of the SIR

Board is scheduled for9:00 a.m. on September13,2013 at 1450 KLORd, Kelowna, BC

For more information

visit www.oksir.orq

An environmentally sensitive, cornmunity bøsed program to control the codlíng moth.

A47

carolyn

Typewritten Text

AR2


BYLAW NO.5666

A bylaw to amend Sorrento Watenruorks Service Area Bylaw No. Sb41

WHEREAS a service area has been established by the Columbia Shuswap RegionalDistrict by Bylaw No. 5541, cited as "sorrento Watenruorks Service Area Bylaw No. 5541", forthe purpose of providing water to the Sorrento area within Electoral Area 'C';

AND WHEREAS requests from property owners outside the service area have beenreceived by the Regional Board for the purpose of having additional lands included in the waterservice area;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to include within the aforesaid service areaadditional lands as petitioned;

AND WHEREAS the Director for Electoral Area 'C' has consented, in writing, to theadoption of this bylaw;

NOW THEREFORE in open meeting assembled, the Board of Directors of the ColumbiaShuswap Regional District enacts as follows:

BOUNDARY

1. The boundaries of the "Sorrento Watenruorks Service Area" as established by SorrentoWatenvorks Service Area Bylaw No. 5541 are hereby extended to include the landsoutlined and described in Schedules "8", "ç" and "D", which is attached hereto andforms part of this bylaw.

2. Schedule "A" of Sorrento Waten¡rorks Service Area Bylaw No. 5541 is hereby deletedand replaced by Schedule "4" attached hereto and forming part of this bylaw.

EFFECTIVE DATE

3. This Bylaw will come into effect upon adoption.

A49

carolyn

Typewritten Text

ABL1

Bylaw No. 5666 Page 2

CITATION

4. This Bylaw may be cited as the "Sorrento Watenruorks Service Area Amendment BylawNo. 5666".

READ a first tíme this 20'n day of June 2013.

2013.

2013.

READ a second time this 20tn day of June

READ a third time this z}n

ADOPTED this l gth

day of

day of

June

Julv ,2013.

CH I EF ADM I NISTRATIVE OFFICER

CERTIFIED a true copy ofBylaw No. 5666 as read a third time.

CHAIR

CERTIFIED a true copy ofBylaw No. 5666 as adopted.

Manager of CorporateAdministration Services

Manager of CorporateAdministration Services

A50

SORRENTO WATERWORKSSERVICE AREA AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 5666

SCHEDULE IIA''

t--.rd

ffi

'.1¡

Lç

!J.¿tri:

A51

SORRENTO WATERWORKSSERVICE AREA AMENDMENT BYLAVV NO. 5666

SCHEDULE "B'

A52

SORRENTO WÂTERWORKSSERVJCE AREA AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 5666

SCHEDULE'C'

A53

SORRENTO WATERWORKSSERVJCE AREA AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 5666

SCHEDULE "D"

d{Ót

A54

TO:

FROM:

SUBJEGT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Gary Holte, ManagerEnvironment & Engineering Services

File No: 5510 01Bylaw No. 5668Bylaw No. 5669

Date: July 2,2013

Dangerous Dog Gontrol Bylaws Electoral Area'F'

THAT:Bylaw No. 5668, cited as "Area 'F' Dangerous Dog Control ServiceEstablishment Bylaw No. 5668" be read a first, second and third time this 18'nday of July, 2013.

AND THAT:Bylaw No. 5669, cited as "Area 'F' Dangerous Dog Regulation and lmpoundBylaw number No. 5669" be read a first, second and third time this 18'n day ofJu|y,2013.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration: ,,'" 7Meeting Date: July 18' 2013

charres Hamitton. cAo

SHORT SUMMARY:

The Electoral Area 'F' Director wishes to initiate a dog control service for Area 'F' that is limited todangerous dog complaints. The service will commence in 2014 and will be funded by a tax onimprovements only in the proposed service area (Electoral Area 'F'). Staff is bringing fonruard anEstablishment and a Regulatory Bylaw to the Board for approval.

VOTING: Unweighted Corporate tl Weighted Corporate tr Stakeholder n(Weighted)

BACKGROUND:

Existing dog control service in Electoral Area 'C' and the community of Ranchero in Electoral Area 'D', inaddition to dangerous dog complaints, includes regulations for dogs running at large, barking dogs,nuisance dogs, kennels, and licensing. The proposed dangerous dog service for ElectoralArea 'F'will beprovided by contract and remuneration to the contractor will be based on a flat fee for administration andstandby plus an hourly rate and mileage fee per call. Property owners in Area 'F' will pay a tax onimprovements (land excluded) for this service that will commence in 2014. The draft bylaws werediscussed at the Electoral Area Director meeting on February 14,2013.

Page 1 of 3

A55

carolyn

Typewritten Text

ABL2

BOARD REPORT Dangerous Dog Control Bylaw Area 'F' July 18,2013

POLIGY:

Bylaw No. 5668 "Area'F' Dangerous Dog Control Service Establishment Bylaw" and Bylaw No. 5669"Area 'F' Dangerous Dog Regulation and lmpound Bylaw are attached for Board approval.

FINANCIAL:

The estimated annual cost of a dog control contractor to provide the proposed service for Area 'F' in2014is $10,000, basedon lSdangerouscallsperyear. The$l0,000isbasedonanannual flatfeeof$4,000 for administration and stand-by service and $35.00 per hour for response time and mileage.The budget for advertising the program will be $2500 in 2014, and will be reduced to $1,000 insubsequent years. The annual cost per resident based on the average value of improvements is $3.16.As the tax is apportioned on improvements only, property owners with vacant lots will not pay for thisservice.

KEY rSSUE(SyCONCEPT(S):

lf the dangerous dog control service for Area 'F' is approved by the Board, the Regional District willhave two different levels of dog control service, with associated administration and communicationchallenges.

IMPLEMENTATION:

The dog control service for Area 'F' will be implemented January 1,2014.

LrsT NAME OF REPORT(S) /DOC Ð

1. Area 'F' Dangerous Dog ControlService Establishment Bylaw No. 5668


X

Available fromStaff:n

2. Area 'F' Dangerous Dog ControlRegulation Bylaw No. 5669


X

Available fromStaff:u

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



3. Defer


Page 2 of 3

A56

BOARD REPORT Dangerous Dog Control Bylaw Area 'F' July 18,2013

COMMUNIGATIONS:

The CSRD will launch a communications campaign early in 2014 to educate the public in Area 'F'about this new service.


J-¡1 3 ¿-or},

u -t /u3/l:Finance & lnformation

Page 3 of 3

A57

COLUM BIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT

BYLAW NO.5668

A bylaw to establish a dangerous dog control service within Electoral Area'F'

WHEREAS a regional district may, by bylaw, establish and operate a service under theprovisions of the Local Government Act;

AND WHEREAS the Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District wishes to establish aservice for the purpose of providing dangerous dog control within Electoral Area 'F',

AND WHEREAS the participating area includes all of the electoral area and can be establishedwithout borrowing;

AND WHEREAS the Director of Electoral Area 'F' has consented, in writing, to the adoption ofthis bylaw;

NOW THEREFORE the Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District, in open meetingassembled, HEREBY ENACïS as follows:

SERVICE

1. The Regional District hereby establishes, within Electoral Area 'F', a service area for thepurpose of providing dangerous dog control to be known as the "Area 'F' Dangerous DogControl Service Area."

SERVICE AREA

2. The service area established by this bylaw is the boundary of ElectoralArea'F'.

PARTICIPATING AREA

3. The participating area in the named service is ElectoralArea'F'.

REQUISITION

4. The maximum amount of money that may be requisitioned for the service provided under Section 1

of this bylaw will be Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) annually within the service area.

COST RECOVERY

5. The annual financial contribution shall be recovered by one or more of the following:

a) The requisition of money to be collected by a property value tax levied against the nettaxable value of improvements within the service area;

b) The imposition of fees and other charges that may be fixed by separate bylaw for thepurpose of recovering these costs;

c) Revenues received by way of agreement, enterprise, gift, grant or otherwise.

6. No borrowing shall be incurred for the purposes of this service.

A58


FORCE AND EFFECT

7. This bylaw will come into force and effect on December 31, 2013.

CITATION

8. This bylaw may be cited as "Area 'F' Dangerous Dog Control Service Establishment Bylaw No.5668.'

READ a first time this z}tn day of

READ a second time this 20th day of

READ a third time this 20th day of

APPROVED by the lnspector of Municipalities this _ day of

ADOPTED this day of

CH I EF ADMI NISTRATIVE OFFICER

CERï|F|ED a true copy ofBylaw No. 5668 as read a third time.

Deputy Manager of CorporateAdm inistration Services

June ,2013.

June ,2013.

June ,2013.

2013.

2013.

CHAIR


Deputy Manager of CorporateAdm inistration Services

A59

COLUM BIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT

BYLAW NO.5669

A bylaw to regulate the control of dangerous dogs within Electoral Area 'F'

WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District is empoweredand authorized pursuant to the Local Government Act to regulate the keeping of dogs and to provide forthe fixing, imposing and collecting fees for licensing dogs and impounding dangerous dogs;

AND WHEREAS the Board of Directors has established a dangerous dog control service withinElectoral 'F';

AND WHEREAS the Board of Directors deems it desirable and expedient to provide forregulation and enforcement of dangerous dog control provisions within Electoral Area 'F';

NOW THEREFORE the Board of Directors of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District, in anopen meeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

DEFINITIONS

1. ln this Bylaw:

"BOARD " means the Board of Directors of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District.

"DANGEROUS DOG" means any dog that:

a) has killed or seriously injured a person; orb) has killed or seriously injured a domestic animal in a public place or while on private

property, other than property owned or occupied by the person responsible for the dog;or

c) a Dog Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe is likely to kill or seriously injurea person.

"DOG" means an animal of the canine species.

"DOG CONTROL OFFICER" means that person appointed by the Board to enforce theprovisions of this Bylaw.

"HARBOURER" means a person who is in possession, gives shelter to, feeds or keeps a dog.

"OWNER" means the person, partnership, association or corporation that owns a dog.

"PERSON" means and includes any individual, group of individuals, society, corporation,partnership and the heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives of the same.

"POUND" means the facility or facilities designated by the Regional District, which is used forthe temporary housing and care of dogs that have been impounded pursuant to this Bylaw.

"REGIONAL DlSTRlCT" means the Columbia Shuswap Regional District.

A60


AUTHORITY, APPLICATION AND ENFORCEMENT

2. This Bylaw applies to the entirety of all lands within Electoral Area 'F'.

3. A Peace Officer, Bylaw Enforcement Officer, Dog Control Officer or designate and any otherperson duly authorized by the Regional District may enter onto any property at any reasonabletime to ascertain whether the provisions of this Bylaw are being observed and may takewhatever action is deemed necessary in accordance with this Bylaw.

4. No person shall unreasonably obstruct or prevent a Dog Control Officer from carrying out theirduties as prescribed in this Bylaw.

LICENSING OF DOGS

5. Annual dog licenses and dog tags will be available to owners of dogs within Electoral Area 'F' ona voluntary basis by applying to the Regional District or the Dog Control Officer for a dog licenseand paying the dog license fee as set out in Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part ofthis bylaw.

6. As a condition of release from the pound, the owner of a dog that has been impounded inaccordance with the provisions of this bylaw must purchase a dog license at the annual licensefee set out in Schedule 'A'.

DANGEROUS DOGS

7. Any Dog Control Officer shall have the authority and the discretion to make a determination thata dog is a dangerous dog.

8. lf a dog bites, infficts injury, assaults or othen¡rise attacks a human being or animal ordangerously pursues a person or domestic animal, the said dog may be impounded pursuant tothis Bylaw.

9. A Dog Control Officer may seize a dog if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that theanimal is a dangerous dog and may detain and impound the dangerous dog for twenty-one (21)days, or longer where an application for a destruction order is made to the Provincial Court bythe Dog Control Officer. Should the order not be granted the dangerous dog shall be returned tothe owner, upon:

a) submission of a completed Release and Waiver of Liability, Assumption of Risks andlndemnity Agreement in the form provided by the Regional District; and

b) payment of all fines or fees due pursuant to this bylaw.

10. The owner of a dog that has been determined to be a Dangerous Dog pursuant to this Bylawmay surrender the dangerous dog to the Dog Control Officer for destruction at no cost to theowner.

A61


COMPLAINTS

11. ln the event of a complaint alleging a dangerous dog, the Dog Control Officer will be responsiblefor investigating the complaint. lf the owner or harbourer of the dog can be ascertained, theDog Control Officer has the authority to either:

a) issue a written warning notice to the owner or harbourer of the dog; or

b) issue a ticket under the CSRD Ticket lnformation UtilizationBylaw; or

c) impound the dog, or

c) any combination of the above.

12. A repeat offence following a written warning notice will be considered a violation of this bylaw.

IMPOUNDING OF DANGEROUS DOGS

13. lmpounding - Any dangerous dog may be impounded by a Dog Control Officer.

14. Release - no dangerous dog may be released from the pound until all provisions of this Bylawhave been met and allfines, fees and penalties have been paid.

15. Unlawful Release - it is unlawful for any person, other than a Dog Control Officer acting in thecourse of its duties, to release or rescue or to attempt to release or rescue any dangerous doglawfully in the custody of the Dog Control Officer or the pound.

16. Notice to Owner - if an impounded dog's owner is known to the Dog Control Officer, the DogControl Officer must make reasonable efforts to notify the owner of the impounded dog bytelephone or mail, whichever is the most practical, that the dog has been impounded.

17. Notice of lmpoundment - if the dangerous dog's owner is not known to the Dog ControlOfficer, the Dog Control Officer must make reasonable efforts to locate the owner by posting a"Notice of lmpoundment" at the pound where the dog is impounded, and the Dog ControlOfficer's website.

18. Unclaimed Dangerous dogs - if the owner or harbourer of a dangerous dog impounded inaccordance with this Bylaw is not known to the Dog Control Officer or if the owner so notifieddoes not appear at the Regional District office to pay the lawful fines, fees and penaltiespursuant to this or any Regional District Bylaw that may apply, the Dog Control Officer maydestroy the dangerous dog as provided for in this Bylaw.

19. Responsibility for Uncollected Fees and Gosts - the owner or harbourer of a dangerous dogis responsible for all unpaid fees, fines or penalties imposed in accordance with this Bylaw andits Schedule(s).

POUND

20. The Regional District may provide or arrange by contract with others to provide such buildings,yards, enclosures and motor vehicles as may be deemed necessary for the care, keeping andtransportation of dangerous dogs that have been impounded.

A62


FEES AND PENALTIES

21. All fees and penalties as set out in Schedules 'A' and 'B' attached hereto and forming a part ofthis bylaw, are hereby imposed and are payable to the Regional District or the Dog ControlOfficer.

REGORDS

22. The Dog Control Officer shall keep detailed records that include a description of the dog, dogtag number (if available), name of the dog; name and address of the owner; date and reasonfor:

a) warning notices delivered;

b) complaints received;

c) impoundments;

d) destruction of dogs.

23. The Dog Control Officer shall keep detailed records of the fees and penalties for:

a) impoundments;

b) destruction of dogs.

24. The Dog Control Officer shall keep detailed records of all monies received pursuant to thisbylaw and shall, at least once in every month, submit such records to the Regional District.

OFFENCES

Any person who contravenes any provision of this Bylaw, or who suffers or permits any act orthing to be done in contravention of any provision of this Bylaw, or who neglects to do or refrainsfrom doing anything required to be done by any provision of this Bylaw, commits an offenceagainst this Bylaw and is subject to:

a) a fine in accordance with the CSRD Ticket lnformation Utilization Bylaw if an informationrespecting the infraction is laid by means of a ticket; or

b) upon summary conviction, a fine not exceeding $2,000 and the costs of prosecution; orc) any combination of the above.

Each day a new contravention of or failure to comply with any provision of this Bylaw continuesto exist shall constitute a separate offence.

Any penalty imposed pursuant to this Bylaw shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for,any other penalty or remedy imposed pursuant to any other applicable statute, Iaw, orregulation.

25.

26.

27.

A63


SEVERANGE

28. lf any portion of this Bylaw is held to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, suchinvalidity does not affect the remaining portions of the Bylaw.

FORCE AND EFFECT

29. This bylaw will come into force and effect on December 31, 2013.

CITATION

30. This Bylaw may be cited as " Area'F' Dangerous Dog Control Regulation Bylaw No. 5669".

READ a first time this 18'n day of

READ a second time this 18rh day of

READ a third time this 18th day of

ADOPTED this day of

CHI EF ADM IN ISÏRAÏIVE OFFICER


Deputy Manager of CorporateAdministration Services

Julv .2013.

Julv ,2013.

Julv .2013.

2013.

CHAIR

A64


COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICTAREA'F DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL REGULATION BYLAW

SCHEDULE'A'

Annual License Fees (Voluntarv*ì

1. Annual Licence Fee for Each Dog

a) Unspayed female or unneutered male dog $50.00

b) Spayed female or neutered male dog $15.00

c Replacement Tags $5.00

2. For the purposes of determining whether a dog has been spayed or neutered, the owner orharbourer shall provide evidence to the satisfaction of the Dog Control Officer that the dog isspayed or neutered.

3. For license fees paid by new residents and new dog owners after June 30th, but before Octooer1st in each calendar year, a fifty percent (50%) discount shall apply.

4. For license fees paid by new residents and new dog owners after October 1st in each calendaryear, a seventy-five percent (75%) discount shall apply.

* annual license fees are mandatory for dogs that have been impounded in accordance with theprovisions of this bylaw (see Section 6).

A65


COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICTAREA'F DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL REGULATION BYLAW

SCHEDULE'B'

lmpound Fees

1. lmpound Fees- First lmpoundment $200.00- Second lmpoundment $350.00

2 Daily Maintenance Fee $20.00(includes any part of day for which a dog is impounded)

3 The owner of a dog shall be responsible for any extraordinary costs and/or fees for equipment,labour, or services incurred and assessed by the Regional District for extraordinary resourcesnecessary to control and impound a dangerous dog, or a potentially dangerous dog.

4. Destruction Fee* - Actual cost (not to exceed $200.00)

*Destruction Fee will be waived where a dog is voluntarily surrendered for destruction in accordancewith Section 9 of this bylaw.

A66

BOARD

Ghair and Directors

REPORT

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION #I:

Peter Jarman

Manager, Financial Services

File No: 5600 51 03

Bylaw No. 5670

Sl Bylaw.9098

Date: June 25,2013

Waverly Park Water Upgrade Borrowing Bylaws

THAT:Bylaw No. 5670, cited as "Waverly Park Water Upgrade TemporaryBorrowing Bylaw No. 5670" be read a first, second and third time this 18thday of July, 2013.

RECOMMENDATION#2: THAT:Bylaw No. 5670, cited as 'Waverly Park Water Upgrade TemporaryBorrowing Bylaw No. 5670" be adopted this l Bth day of July, 2013.

RECOMMENDATION#3: THAT:Bylaw No. 9098, cited as "Columbia Shuswap Regional District Securitylssuing Bylaw No. 9098" be read a first, second, and third time this 18thday of July, 2013.

RECOMMENDATION#4: THAT:Bylaw No. 9098, cited as "Columbia Shuswap Regional District Securitylssuing Bylaw No. 9098" be adopted this 18th day of July, 2013.

SHORT SUMMARY:

Subsequent to the adoption of the Waverly Park Water Llpgrade Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 5655on May 16, 2013 and the commencement of works to connect Waverly Park to the Sorrento Watersystem, temporary borrowing and security issuing bylaws can now be arrangeo.

VOTING:Unweighted !Corporate

WeightedCorporate

Stakeholder !(Weighted)

a

BACKGROUND:

The Waverly Park Water Users Community consists o'f 25 properties. The Community has beenstruggling to meet the requirements of the Drinking Water Protection Act and was faced withsubstantial upgrade requirements if the option to connect to the Sorrento Water System was notavailable. The Board has approved the Waverly Park Service Establishment Bylaw and LoanAuthorization Bylaw for the purpose of borrowing to pay for infrastructure required to connect to the

APPROVED for Board Consideration: (" A- /WMeeting Date: July 18, 2013 Charles Hamiltón, CAO

Page 1 of 2

A67

carolyn

Typewritten Text

ABL3

Board Report Waverly Park Water Upgrade Borrowing Bylaws July 18, 2013

Sorrento Water System. The Province has approved these bylaws.

POLIGY:

W-4 Water Utility Acquisition

FINANCIAL:

The Waverly Park Water Users Community will be subject to the Waverly Park Water Users ServiceArea Bylaw No. 5654 for debt repayment which will be administered within Function 189 of the CSRDFive Year Financial Plan. Temporary Borrowing Bylaw 5670 will facilitate temporary borrowingrequired to upgrade the water system before conversion to the 2013 MFA Fall debenture issue underSecurity lssuing Bylaw 9098.

KEY ISSUES/CONGEPTS:

To supply safe, potable water to the Waverly Park Water Users Community. This will allow all users totake advantage of economies of scale of a larger water system.

IMPLEMENTATION:

Upon adoption

DESIRED OUTCOMES:To borrow funds to create required infrastructure to supply potable water to the Waverly Park WaterUsers Community.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:



3. Defer


COMMUNICATIONS:

Signed documentation will be fon¡varded to the Ministry and Municipal Finance Authority.


1. Waverly Park Water Upgrade Temporary BorrowingBylaw No. 5670


tx


2. Columbia Shuswap Regional District Security lssuingBylaw No.9098


tx


Page 2 of 2

A68


Temporary Borrowing Bylaw

BYLAW NO.5670

A bvlaw to authorize temporary borrowino pendinq the sale of debentures

WHEREAS the Regional District is authorized by the Local Government Act, where it has adopted aloan authorization bylaw, without further assents or approvals, to borrow temporarily from any personunder the conditions therein set out;

AND WHEREAS the Regional Board has adopted Bylaw No. 5655, cited as "Waverly Park WaterUpgrade Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 5655", authorizing a water distribution system upgrades, in theamount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000);

AND WHEREAS the sale of debentures has been temporarily deferred;

NOW ÏHEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District in openmeeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS as follows:

1. The Regional Board is hereby authorized and empowered to borrow an amount or amounts notexceeding the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), as the same may be required.

2. The form of obligation to be given as acknowledgement of the liability shall be a promissory note ornotes bearing the corporate seal and signed by the Chair and the Financial Administration Officer.

3. The money so borrowed shall be used solely for the purposes set out in said Bylaw No. 5655.

4. The proceeds from the sale of debentures or so much thereof as may be necessary shall be used torepay the money so borrowed.

5. This bylaw may be cited as "Waverly Park Water Upgrade Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 5670,

READ a first time this 18'n day of ,2013.

READ a second time this 18'n day of ,2013.

READ a third time this

ADOPTED this

18'n day of

18'n day of

.2013.

,2013.

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

CERï|F|ED true copy of Bylaw No. 5670as adopted.

DEPUTY MANAGER OF CORPORATEADM I N ISTRATION SERVICES

CHAIR

A69


BYLAW NO.9098

A bylaw to authorize the entering into of an Agreementrespecting financing between the Columbia Shuswap Regional

District ("the Regional District") and the Municipal FinanceAuthoritv of British Columbia ("the Authoritv")

WHEREAS the Authority may provide financing of capital requirements of regional districts or fortheir member municipalities by the issuance of debentures or other evidence of indebtedness of theAuthority and lending the proceeds therefrom to the regional district on whose request the financing isundertaken;

AND WHEREAS under the provisions of Section 825 of the Local Government Act, the amountof borrowing authorized by the following loan authorization bylaw, the amount already borrowed underthe authority thereof, the amount of authorization to borrow remaining there under and the amount beingissued under the authority thereof by this bylaw, is as follows:

REGIONAL BYLAW PURPOSE AMOUNT OF AMOUNT BORROWING TERMDISTRICT NUMBER BORROWING ALREADY AUTHORITY OF

AUTHORIZED BORROWED REMAINING ISSUE

AMOUNTOF

ISSUE

ColumbiaShuswap

Waverly Park5655 Water $300,000 nil $300,000 20 Yrs. $300,000

Upgrade

1.

AND WHEREAS the Regional Board, by this bylaw, hereby requests such financing shall beundertaken by the Authority;

NOW THEREFORE the Regional Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District, in openmeeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS as follows:

The Authority is hereby requested and authorized to finance from time to time the aforesaidundertakings at the sole cost and on behalf of the Regional District, up to but not exceeding ThreeHundred Thousand ($300,000) in lawful money of Canada (provided that the Regional District mayborrow all or part of such amount in such currency as the Trustees of the Authority shall determinebut the aggregate amount in lawful money of Canada and in Canadian Dollar equivalents soborrowed shall not exceed $300,000 in Canadian Dollars) at such interest and with such discounts orpremiums and expenses as the Authority may deem appropriate in consideration of the market andeconomic conditions pertaining.

Upon completion by the Authority of financing undertaken pursuant hereto, the Chair and Treasurerof the Regional District, on behalf of the Regional District and under its seal shall, at such time ortimes as the Trustees of the Authority may request, enter into and deliver to the Authority one ormore agreements which said agreement or agreements shall be substantially in the form annexedhereto as Schedule A and made part of the bylaw (such agreement or agreements as may beentered into, delivered or substituted hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") providing forpayment by the Regional District to the Authority of the amounts required to meet the obligations ofthe Authority with respect to its borrowings undertaken pursuant hereto, which Agreement shall rankas debenture debt of the Regional District.

2.

,,.12

A70

Bylaw No. 9098 Page2

The Agreement in the form of Schedule A shall be dated and payable in the principle amount oramounts of money in Canadian dollars or as the Authority shall determine and subject to the LocalGovernment Act, in such other currency or currencies as shall be borrowed by the Authority underSection 1 and shall set out the schedule or repayment of the principal amount together with intereston unpaid amounts as shall be determined by the Treasurer of the Authority.

The obligation incurred under the said Agreement shall bear interest from a date specified therein,which date shall be determined by the Treasurer of the Authority, and shall bear interest at a rate tobe determined by the Treasurer of the Authority.

The Agreement shall be sealed with the seal of the Regional District and shall bear the signatures ofthe Chair and Treasurer.

The obligations incurred under the said Agreement as to both principal and interest shall be payableat the Head Office of the Authority in Victoria and at such time or times as shall be determined by theTreasurer of the Authority.

During the currency of the obligation incurred under the said Agreement to secure borrowings inrespect of Waverly Park Water Upgrade Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 5655, the anticipatedrevenues accruing to the Regional District from the operation of the water upgrade are at any timeinsufficient to meet the annual payment of interest and the repayment of principal in any year, thereshall be requisitioned an amount sufficient to meet such sufficiency.

The Regional District shall pay over to the Authority at such time or times as the Treasurer of theAuthority so directs such sums as are required pursuant to Section 15 of the Municipal FinanceAuthority Act to be paid into the Debt Reserve Fund established by the Authority in connection withthe financing undertaken by the Authority on behalf of the Regional District pursuant to theAgreement.

The Regional District shall pay over to the Authority at such time or times as the Treasurer of theAuthority so directs such sums as are required pursuant to Section 15 of the Municipal FinanceAuthority Act to be paid into the Debt Reserve Fund established by the Authority in connection withthe financing undertaken by the Authority on behalf of the Regional District pursuant to theAgreement.

3.

4.

6.

7.

8.

9.

..t3

A71


10. This bylaw may be cited as "Columbia Shuswap Regional District Security lssuing Bylaw No. 9098."

READ a first time this l gth day of Julv

READ a second time this


ADOPTED this

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

CERTIFIED true copy of Bylaw No. 9098as adopted.

DEPUTY MANAGER OF CORPORATEADMIN ISTRATION SERVICES

l Bth day of

day of

day of

Julv

2013.

2013.

2013.

2013.

l gth Julv

l Btn Julv

CHAIR

A72

SCHEDULE rrArr to Bylaw No. 9098

CANADA

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

AGREEMENT

Columbia Shuswap Regional District

The Columbia Shuswap Regional District (the "Regional District") hereby promises to pay to theMunicipal Finance Authority of British Columbia at its Head Office in Victoria, British Columbia,(the "Authority") the sum of Three Hundred Thousand ($300,000) in lawful money of Canada,together with interest calculated semi-annually in each and every year during the currency ofthis Agreement; and payments shall be as specified in the table appearing on the reverse hereofcommencing on the day of _, provided that in the event the payments of principal andinterest hereunder are insufficient to satisfy the obligations of the Authority undertaken onbehalf of the Regional District, the Regional District shall pay over to the Authority further sumsas are sufficient to discharge the obligations of the Regional District to the Authority.

DAïED at British Columbia, this _ day of _, 20_lN TESTIMONY WHEREOF and under the authority ofBylaw No. 9098 cited as "Columbia Shuswap RegionalDistrict Security lssuing Bylaw No. 9098". This Agreementis sealed with the Corporate Seal of the ColumbiaShuswap Regional District and signed by the Chair andthe officer assigned the responsibility of financialadministration thereof.

Chair

(Financial Administration Officer)

Pursuant to the Local Government Act, I

certify that this Agreement has beenlawfully and validly made and issued andthat its validity is not open to questionon any ground whatever in any Court ofthe Province of British Columbia.

Dated (month, day) ZO_

lnspector of Municipalities

(Reverse Side)

A73

PRINCIPAL AND/ OR SINKING FUND DEPOSIT AND INTEREST PAYMENTS

Principal and/or SinkingDate of Pavment Fund Deposit lnterest Total

PRINCIPAL AND/ OR SINKING FUND DEPOSIT AND INTEREST PAYMENTS

Principal andior SinkingDate of Pavment Fund Deposit lnterest Total

$$

A74

Name of Person or Organization:

S*otruo* ,4rrr* Sr*roTopic of Discussion: ,a]Lka-¿ru¿' nNlJ J'-zC.eË-A¿7o Ò,-

QÉ.rr.e u- Éo-¿ z4czsra /cæ. ( 'iz¿?-e 'to)f,t* S-¿tzt.ç..u,¿e.

Purpose of Presentation: 0 lnformation Only

û Requesting Support

m/Requesting Fundirg

ú Other (provide details)

Contact lnformation:=S-¿-r,=.4cC<¿,< A Z ,

Address: 7sf g Go¿_t= %t¿tr¿s.€ //- ¿)¿"urç2 /à'47'-

Phone Number: z s-o- g?2- 9232

EmailAddress: Jr. .n. Ol" los. ,-tq,fr

Meeting Date Requested:

Presentation Materials - lf vou will le n rting documentation, it should be provided to

REQUEST TO APPEAR AS A DELEGATION

you prov'dingCorporate Administration Services for inclusion inthe agenda package (by 12 Noon on the Tuesday onefuttweek before the meeting). PowerPoint presentation materials must be forwarded to the CSRD atleast one day prior to the meeting to ensure its compatibility with CSRD equipment.

C

Send your completed Request to Appear as a Delegation Form

Columbia Shuswap Regional DistrictAttention: Deputy Manager of Corporate Administration781 Marine Park Drive NEPO Box 978Salmon Arm BC V1E 4P1Fax: 250-832-3375Email: admin{Õcsrd.bc.ca

Phone: 250-832-81

llAgenda- - --DReg Boarcì

üln Camera

úOther Mtg

OwnersntP

File,f

Ack Sent

trFaxEMai¡trEmail

JUN 1 1 2013

trSlafl lo RePortnStalf to Respondnslaff lnf o OnlYúDir Mailbox

Toll-free: 1-888-2

Page 1 of 2

DEL1

carolyn

Typewritten Text

DEL1

TO:

FROM:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors

Dan PassmoreDevelopment Services Assistant ll

File No: LC 2480E

Date: June 25.2013

SUBJEGT: Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) applicationSection 20(3) - Non Farm Use within the ALRAgent: TELUSOwner: Gordon Thomas Wright and Bonny-Lee Jones

RECOMMENDATION: THAT:Application No. LC2480E Section 20(3) Non-Farm Use within the ALR, forThat Part of Legal Subdivision 16 Lying.East of the Eagle River, Section 24,Township 22, Range 7, West of the 6In Meridian, Kamloops Division YaleDistrict, be fonruarded to the Provincial Agricultural Land Commissionrecommending approval on this 18th day of July, 2013.

SHORT SUMMARì .

The applicants would like to use a small portion (0.04 ha) of the subject propertyRadiocommunications facility. The facility would consist of a 50.0 m (196.85 ft) self-supporttogether with a small support building at its base. The tower would be used to address coverage gapsand provide dependable wireless data and voice communication services in the Rural Sicamous areaand along the Trans Canada highway corridor.

VOTING: Weighted Corporate E Stakeholder tr(Weighted)

for atower

Unweighted Corporate

LGA Part 26 tr(Unweighted)

APPROVED for Board Consideration:Meeting Date: July 18, 2013

BACKGROUND:

PROPERTY OWNER:

APPLICANT/AGENT:

ELECTORAL AREA:

CIVIC ADDRESS:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

Gordon Thomas Wright and Bonny-Lee Jones

TelustEt

Luoma Road

That Part of Legal Subdivision 16 Lying East of the Eagle River, Section24, Township 22, Range 7, West of the 6th Meridian, Kamloops DivisionYale District

Page 1 ofS

DS1

carolyn

Typewritten Text

ALR1

Board Report LC2480E July 18, 2013

DESIGNATION:

ZONE:

CURRENT USE:

PROPOSED USE:

SIZE OF PROPERW: 9.7 ha

A - Agriculture

A - Agriculture

Vacant Land

Self-Support Tower

SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN:

Eagle River/Rural

Agriculture/Trans Canada Highway

Crown Land. Forest

West: Eagle River/Rural

Site Gomments:

Staff conducted a site visit on June 28. The site of the new tower together with the proposed accessroad have been identified on the site by stakes and flagging. ïhe site of the tower is within a heavilytreed area to the north of the property, beyond the existing field.

Access to the parcel is proposed to be from Luoma Road, which is a frontage road off the TransCanada Highway. Access would be achieved by constructing a driveway through the propertyimmediately adjacent to the subject property and to the south. The adjacent parcel (That Part of LS 9Lying South and East of the Eagle River) is also owned by the subject property owners, and theapplicant advises that they have agreed to the installation of this access route.

The proposed site of the tower is within the floodplain of the Eagle River. Yard Creek Provincial Parkis adjacent to the site to the east.

Soils Gapability:

North:

South:

East:

5413w-4w-5r

rtw

54w -4w- 5

6

P-5M

6

P-5M

[,

P

M

4lPlM)

4

[-

il

Canada Land lnventory Soil mapping indicates thatapproximately 80% of the subject property has 50% Class 3 withexcess water and inundation as the major and minor limitingfactors, respectively, 40To is Class 4 with the same limitingfactors and 10% is Class 5 with the limiting factors reversed inimportance.

The soils do not appear to be improvable.

20o/o of the subject property in the southeast corner are 60%Class 4 with stoniness and moisture deficiencies as the majorand minor limiting factors, respectively, and 40o/o is Class 5 withthe same limiting factors.

The soils do not appear to be improvable.

I

4

Page 2 of 5

DS2

Board Report LC2480E July 18,2013

History: There have been 2 ALC applications made in the area. See ALR/History Map.

o 1050 Files missing unable to determine nature of application.

o 2073 (1990) allowed non-farm use of property for a commercial garden operation.

POLICY:

Rural Sicamous Land Use Plan Bylaw No. 2000 - Objectives and Policies

The land is currently designated A - Agriculture. The Agriculture designation is to reserve land in theAgricultural Land Reserve and ensure it is developed primarily for agriculture and so that agricultureuses are protected against incompatible uses.

Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 - A Agriculture Zone

Although the permitted uses of the A Agriculture Zone do not expressly permit telecommunication,,Section 2.3.3 Uses Permitted in Each Zone does permit a public utility use in every zone. Public utilityis defined as follows:

PUBLIC UTILITY is the use of land, buildings and structures for electrical, telephone, water,sewer, gas, cable television, or other like services provided by a private provider operatingpursuant to authority granted in public utility legislation.

The use of a small portion of the subject property as proposed in this application is therefore a usepermitted in Bylaw No. 2000.

Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Gonsultation Policy No. P-22

The Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Consultation Policy was endorsed by the Board at theMay 17,2012 regular meeting, and approved for inclusion into the CSRD Policy manual. This policydeals with installations such as the tower proposed in this application. As a requirement of the policy,the applicant is required to notify the public by mailing or delivering notices to all owners and tenantsdeemed affected by the proposed facility. The public responses are then sent to lndustry Canada witha required letter of concurrence or non-concurrence from the CSRD.

The policy also encourages the following:

Screening of facilities by using existing vegetation, landscaping, fencing, or other means inorder to blend with the built and natural environments.

BG Reg 17112002 - Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation

Parl2 - Permitted Uses - Subsection 3(1)(m) allows telecommunications equipment, buildings andinstallations as long as the area occupied by the equipment, buildings and installations does notexceed 100 m2 for each parcel. The installation is proposed to be a 20.0 m x 20.0 m (400 m2¡ site.

FINANGIAL:

The approval or denial of this application will impose no financial burdens on the CSRD.

Page 3 of 5

DS3

Board Report LC2480E July 18, 2013

KEY ISSUES/GONGEPTS:

The proposed communication tower installation will impact 0.04 ha (a 20 m x 2O m footprint) of thetotal land area of 9.7 ha of the property. This area is proposed to be fenced off from the rest of theproperty and would therefore be unavailable to the property owner for grazing. Of the remainder of theproperty orthophotos show that approximately 30% of the area in the southern portion of the propertyhas been previously used for agricultural purposes. The rest is largely treed. The proposed site of thetower is within the northern portion of the property and therefore will not impact on any currentagricultural use of the property.

However, access to the site is limited as the çubject property is currently land-locked. The applicant istherefore proposing to provide access to the tower from the adjacent property to the south via a fairlylong driveway which does impact on the agricultural use.

Bylaw No. 2000 permits Public Utility use in all zones. The proposed 50.0 m tower is therefore apermitted use in the A zone.

The immediate surrounding area is mostly rural residential uses, most of which are also in the ALR.The subject property is bordered on the east by Crown Land (Yard Creek Provincial Park). A trailwithin the park meanders close to the shared property boundary, however the area is extensivelytreed. lt is difficult to gauge the impact, if any, of the proposed cell tower on any agricultural useswhich may be present on neighbouring lands.

SUMMARY:

Development Services supports this application for the following reasons:

o The use of a portion of the subject property for a telecommunication tower is permitted byRural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000;

o The area proposed for development is 400 m2, which is very small compared to the size of theproperty (9.7 ha.); and,

o The impact on agriculture for this installation will be minimal, and not in an area of the propertythat is currently used for agriculture.

Development Services staff is concerned that the proposed tower is in close proximity to a ProvincialPark and is proposed to be situated within the floodplain of the Eagle River.

LrsT NAME OF REPORT(S) /DOCU

1. Maps: Location, Site Plan, Soils,ALR/History, Orthophotograph withContours

Attached to AgendaSummary: EI

Available fromStaff: tr

2. PhotosAttached to Agenda

Summary: ØAvailable from

Staff: n3. Additional Photos

Attached to AgendaSummarv: E

Available fromStaff: Ø

4. ApplicationAttached to Agenda

Summarv: !Available from

Staff: Ø5. Telecommunications Facilities

Siting and Consultation Policy No.P-22

Attached to AgendaSummary: n

Available fromStaff: Ø

Page 4 of 5

DS4

Board Report LC2480E July 18,2013

DESIRED OUTGOME:

That the Board endorse staff recommendation.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse staff recommendation. Application LC2480E will be fonryarded to the ALCwith a recommendation of approval.

2. Forward a recommendation of refusal to the ALC.

3. Defer

4. Any other action deemed appropriate by the Board.

COMMUNIGATIONS:

This application was not referred to APC 'E', due to the time sensitive nature of the application andafter a discussion with the Electoral Area 'E' Director. The recommendation of the Board will beforwarded to the ALC.

REVIEWED BY:Date Signed Off(MO/DD/YY)

Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager orTeam Leader

Development Services l.þ 5 | Z.o13 Ç'l),xr

Page 5 of 5

DS5

Location

-¡ ft?.oo I

DS6

Site Plan 1

SITE: BC{7ÍNAME: Kamloops - AB_01

SKETCH

SITE ADDRESS 3279 Luarna, Sicamous, tsritish ColunrbiaTHAT PART OF LEGAL SUBDIVISION 9 LYING SOUTH AND EAST OF THE EAGLERIVER OF SFCTION 24 TOWNSHIP 22 RANGË 7 WËST OF THE 6TH MERIDIAN}(AMLOOPS DIVISION YAI.E DISTRICT. EXCEPT PART INCLUDED IN PLANS R262AND NEP226OO

LANDI-ORD Gordon Thomas Wright and Bonny-Lee Jones as joint tenants

SPECIFIG DRIVINGINSTRUCTIONS:

From Kelowna lnternational Airport travel south and continue along Airport Way forapproximately 250m to Hwy 97. At Hwy 97 turn north (right) and continue forapproximately 113.2 km to the Trans Canada Highway. At the Trans Ganada Highwayturn east (right) and continue for approximately 12.3 km to the premises situated on thenorth (left) side of the Trans Canada Highway municipally known as 3279 Luarna,$icarnous, BC.

DS7

Site Plan 2

APPENDIX 2PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS

SITE PLAN

¿I

II

I.t

I

i

II

I

I

.t

J

iF.--l-\

\ \\

liection 24,Tovtnship 22,

Ronge 7,

V/est of the 6th tleridionKomloops Division

Yole DistrictP.t.D.007/0494 I

DS8

Proposed Compound Layout Plan


COMPOUND LAYOUT

/1\ Ð,s) uür(;r-----.Note: not to scale.

DS9

Tower Elevation Plan


TOWER PROFILE

Note: not to scale.

DS10

Soils

ffr

-ll t

sf,+/

I

PARX

+

SubjectProperty

\l r,.-v.f *rr::-j.\:/ i,,

i''"i:1' l',

DS11

ALR/History

{I

I

F-.lrrlEdMr I

II

II

DS12

Site Photos ¡:'-j.--l*r{

tï4.:t¡ r¡l

{fl

;}I

DS13

Site PhotosDS14

Site Photos

t'aÊ:,\

{

DS15

TO:

FROM:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Marcin Pachcinski, Team LeaderParks & Recreation

File No: 612071 012010 05219

Date: July 8, 2013

SUBJECT: White Lake Subdivision - One Year Deferral of Gash-in-lieu of ParkLand Payment

RECOMMENDATION: THAT:the Board empower the authorized signatories to enter into a oneyear Park Land Payment Deferral Agreement to postpone payment toJuly 18, 2014, for the cash-in-lieu of park land dedication required bySection 941 of the Local Government Act - Provision of park land,and CSRD Policy P-5 Park Land Dedication as a Function ofSubdivision, for the proposed subdivision of property legallydescribed as Lot 1, Section 14, Township 22, Range 10, W6M, KDYD,Plan 43063.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration: ö/tN.** /kMeeting Date: July 18, 2013 Charles Hamilton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

This property is an existing shared interested development on White Lake consisting of 11 homeswhich is in the process of being subdivided into 11 lots (site plan attached). The owners of the subjectproperty have requested a one-year deferral for payment of cash-in-lieu of park land dedication.

BACKGROUND;

The subject property is located on White Lake Road and is a 6.439 ha waterfront parcel. There are 11

homes on the subject property and the 20 owners are close to completing the requirements forapproval of the 11 lot conventional subdivision.

The owners of the subject property applied from exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR)in 2009. The CSRD Board of Directors supported the exclusion at the January 2010 regular Boardmeeting. The Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) granted exclusion from the ALR in June 2010.

The subject property is unzoned and currently has no Official Community Plan (OCP) designation.The proposed ElectoralArea'C' OCP designation is RR2 - Rural Residential 2.

TING: Unweighted Corporate

LGA Part 26(Unweighted)

trø

Weighted Corporate tr Stakeholder(Weighted)

tr

Page 1 of5

DS17

carolyn

Typewritten Text

DS BG1

Board Report White Lake - Deferral of Cash-in-lieu of Park Land Payment July 18, 2012

POLICY:

Section 7.2 of the CSRD Strategic Plan says "The CRSD will expand, provide and suppori a widerange of recreational facilities, programs and opportunities working within the region, in collaborationwith other levels of government and interested parties for the benefit of all communities within theCSRD'i

The Electoral Area 'C' Parks Plan identifies existing parks in the White Lake community, includingthree CSRD parks: Hugh Road lake access, John Evdokimoff Community Bike Park, and White LakeCommunity Park, which serves as a waterfront park and local boat launch. The Plan also recognizesthe recreational opportunities provided by White Lake Provincial Park, which encompasses theeastern half of White Lake.

FINANGIAL:

The subject property was assessed by Corrie Appraisals Ltd., Real Estate Appraisers andConsultants, in April 2013. The assessed land value of the entire subject property is 91,502,000. Therequired 5o/o of the land value is therefore $75,100, which will go into the ElectoralArea'C'future parkland acquisition fund. The deferral agreement will have the potential impact of loss of interest onsome of this amount (it is expected that some of the 20 owners will pay their share of the ownedmonies upon subdivision approval, regardless of the deferral). The details of the division of paymentamong the property owners are being undertaken by a solicitor. CSRD staff are working with thesolicitor regarding the details of the deferral agreement and how it will be registered on title. Cost ofdrafting the agreement and any future modifications (if requested) will be borne by the propertyowners.

KEY rSSUE(S/CONCEPT(S):

The subject property has 1l single family homes and is by any measure a developed piece ofproperty. The community of White Lake has existing waterfront parks (CSRD and Provincial) whichprovide substantial opportunity to access the lake. For these two reasons, cash-in-lieu of park landdedication is the preferred option.

Given there are 20 registered owners on the property, staff understand there is a reasonablelikelihood some owners may require additional time to fulfill the 5% cash-in-lieu of park land dedicationpayment requirement. Staff have no objection to a one-year deferral of this payment, and thereforerecommend the CSRD Board of Directors allow the authorized signatories to enter into such anagreement.

Parkland dedication or payment in lieu must be made to the Regional District before final approval ofthe subdivision. However, the Board is authorized under Section 941 (9) of the Local Government Actto enter into an agreement with the owner "that the land or payment be provided or paid by a datespecified in the agreement after final approval has been given". Notice of Parkland Payment DeferralAgreement will be registered on title with the Land Title Office and payment becomes binding onfuture owners of the property.

IMPLEMENTATION:

CSRD staff will work with the subject property's owners in the drafting of the deferral agreement,which will be reviewed by a solicitor retained by the CSRD. Once signed, the deferral agreement willbe registered on title. For clarity, all associated costs will be borne by the property owners.

Page 2 of 3

DS18

Board Report White Lake - Deferral of Cash-in-lieu of Park Land Payment July 18,2012

LrsT oF REPORT(S) / DOCUMENT(S):

1.

2.3.

Location MapCurrent Plan 43063Sketch Plan of proposed subdivision

Attached to Board Available from

Staff: nReport: Ø

DESTRED OUTCOME(S):

The desired outcome is Board approval of a one-year deferral for payment of cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Approve the one-year deferral for payment of cash-in-lieu of park land dedication

2. Deny the one-year deferralfor payment of cash-in-lieu of park land dedication and requireimmediate payment of the cash in lieu amount prior to registration of the subdivision

Defer

Any course of action the Board deems appropriate

3.

4.


Environment & Engineering

Page 3 of 3

DS19

White Lake - Deferral of Cash-in-lieu of Park Land Paymenf 18,2012

Location Map

Current Plan 43063

.oP kwiú.lP k6 ryhñ Oeù tuw¡ Uùtu in

, E4ilnl Pton Ât4S4

[¡i I 9LAillort+

Lol 2 ?LÀj !'ar+

Lof 3 ?LÀ¡¡rÈ13+

DS20

Board Report White Lake - Deferral of Cash-in-lieu of Park Land Payment July 18, 2012

Sketch Plan of Proposed Subdivision

¡i:;;R=--_*:-\ '. --:--l

M

.-t \ ìt

-), \

f--_rcl¡

I-

---lIII

II

'

, i-*-j'"'- l--_-_i

i-------ìi^ ,q-¡Êã-p ì;;.--*-=

+LSr2 \

DS21

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Jennifer Sham

Development Services Assistant

RECOMMENDATION:

Development Varlance Permit 641 -03Mountain Shadows Developments Ltd. lnc. No. B,C0842297Bruce Fairley (Agent)

THAT:in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government Act,Development Variance Permit No. 641-03 for Lot 3, Section 6, Township27, Range 21, West of the 5th Meridian, Kootenay District, Plan 162G3Except part included in SRW Plan 16465, varying Subdivision ServicingBylaw No. 641 (Bylaw No. 641), as follows:

1) by waiving the requirement for proposed lot 2 that an independenton-site water system be located on the same parcel as theresidential dwelling unit; and

2) by waiving the requirement for proposed lot 1 that the surfacewater source for an independent on-site water system beidentified on Schedule 'D' List of Eligible Sources of Bylaw No.641, to allow a source of surface water not on Schedule 'D',

be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to thefollowing condition:

a) that the applicant submit written confirmation to the CSRD that thesource contamination prevention methods are complete forproposed lot 2.

SHORT SUMMARY:

The owner/agent would like to vary the requirements of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 asfollows:

. for proposed lot 2 by waiving the requirement that an independent on-site water system belocated on the same parcel as the residential dwelling unit it serves;

. for proposed lot 1 by waiving the requirement that the surface water source be on Schedule'D' of Bylaw No. 641; and

. for the proposed remainder lot by waiving the requirement for an independent on-site watersystem and sanitary sewer disposal.

Page 1 of6

EAD1

carolyn

Typewritten Text

PL BBA1

Board Report DVP641-03 July 18, 2013

VOTING: Unweighted ¡ Weighted n Stakehotder !Corporate Corporate (Weighted)

LGA Part 26 X(Unweighted)

BACKGROUND:

Property Owner: Mountain Shadows Developments Ltd. lnc, No. B,C0842297

Agent: Bruce Fairley

ElectoralArea: 'A'

Civic Address: Highway 95, South of Golden, BC

Legal Description: Lot 3, Section 6, Township 27, Range 21, West of the 5th Meridian, KootenayDistrict, Plan 16263 except part included in SRW Plan16465

Size of Property: 3.125 ha

Current Use: Vacant, Billboardsisigns

ProposedUse: RuralResidential,Vacant,Billboards/signs

Official CommunityPlan: N/A

Zoning: Highway Planning Area No. l Zoning Regulations Bylaw No. 168 - Zone No. 2

Agricultural LandReserve: No

Site Comments: A site visit was not conducted, but the applicant submitted photos of the propertytaken on May 11,2013. The subject property is currently vacant; in the past therewas a dwelling on proposed lot 1, and the proposed remainder is being used forhighway advertising/billboards, The proposed remainder has three wells on it: twowells are being used to service an off-site mobile home park to the north (one wellis within the pumphouse in the southwest portion of the property), while the thirdwell is intended to service proposed lot 2, protected by easement.

SurroundingProperties: North: Reflection Lake Road, Rural Residential

South: Highway 95, CPREast: Rural ResidentialWest. Rural Residential

POLICY:

CSRD Strategic Plan 2008-2012Section 1.3 states the following policy goal; "To ensure that development is designed and built tostandards that protect human safety."

Under Section 7, Land Use, the Strategic Plan contains the general statement; "The CSRD iscommitted to promoting and establishing land uses that are environmentally, socially andeconomically sustainable that provide for a healthy, livable and diverse community with efficientinfrastructure. "

Page 2 of 6

EAD2

Board Report DVP641-03 July 18, 2013

Section 7.2 further states; "Direct community development in an organized and desirable mannerutilizing sound and sustainable planning principles that reflect the community's requirements."

Highway Planning Area No. 1 Zoning Regulations Bylaw No. 168Zone No. 2 (All legal uses)3.024(2) ïhose parts of Section 6 and 7, Township 27, Range 21, Kootenay District lying south of theKicking Horse River, within Highway Planning Area No. 1.

Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641Part 6 of Bylaw No. 641 states that proof must be supplied that an adequate sanitary sewage disposalmethod for each parcel can be provided. The applicant would like to waive this requirement for theproposed remainder lot.

Part 8 of Bylaw No. 641 states the requirements for the assessment and demonstration of potablewater for independent on-site water systems. lndependent On-site Water System is defined as "aDomestic Water System that serves only one Dwelling Unit."

Section 8.2 requires that where a Water Supply System is not available, all new parcels must beprovided with an lndependent On-site Water System. The applicant would like to waive thisrequirement for the proposed remainder lot. The applicant has indicated that two of the three wellslocated on the proposed remainder lot are servicing the off-site mobile home park to the north. One ofthose wells is located within a pumphouse and protected by easement (Plan 16265), while the other isnot within the easement area. The third well is proposed to service proposed lot 2.

Section 8.3(a) states that a surface water source for an independent on-site water system must besurface water from an intake in a water source that has unrecorded water and is on Schedule 'D' Listof Eligible Sources in Bylaw No. 641 that is current as of the date of application for subdivision. Theapplicant is requesting that this requirement be waived to allow him to use an existing water licence(72200) as a source of water for proposed lot 1. This licence was issued in 1990, refers to a dwellingunit that no longer exists, and the spring upon which the licence is issued (Abbott Spring) is not on theList of Eligible Sources.

Section 8.4 requires that all wells using groundwater sources must be on the same parcel as theresidential dwelling unit in respect of which they are required. The proposed source of water forproposed lot 2 is located off-site on the remainder lot and Easement Plan EPP25576 will be registeredon title concurrently with subdivision. The applicant would like to waive the requirement that the wellbe on the same parcelthat it serves.

FINANGIAL:

There are no financial implications to the CSRD, the DVP application is not the result of a BylawEnforcement action. The cost of preparing legal documents will be borne by the property owners.


The owner/agent would like to vary the requirements of Bylaw No. 641 as follows:. Section 6.1 for the proposed remainder lot by waiving the requirement for sanitary sewer

disposal;. Section 8.2Tor the proposed remainder lot by waiving the requirement for an independent on-

site water system;. Section 8.3(a) for proposed lot 1 by waiving the requirement that the surface water source be

on Schedule 'D' List of Eligible Sources in Bylaw No. 641; and. Section 8.4 for proposed lot 2 by waiving the requirement that an independent on-site water

system be located on the same parcel as the residential dwelling unit it serves.

Page 3 of 6

EAD3

Board Report DVP641-03 July 18,2013

regulations of Bylaw No. 641. Further, staff recommend that the covenant prohibit sources ofcontamination from being located within a 30 m radius of each of the existing wells that are servicingother parcels. Staff note that there is no building inspection in this area.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse the Recommendation, DVP641-03 will be rssued.

2. Deny issuance of DVP641-03.

3. Defer.


COMMUNICATIONS:

Property owners and tenants in occupation within 100 m of the subject property were notified of thisDVP application by mail and hand delivery, prior to consideration by the Board.

Agency CommentsMinistry of Transportation andlnfrastructure

No objections to the variance but a covenant should beplaced on title stating that the remainder does not have wateror seotic services on the oropertv.

Interior Health Authority lnterior Health Authority has no objections to the describedparcel being without a sewerage system. lt is recommendeda covenant be applied prohibiting development of anyfacilities which would generate sewage.

lnterior Health Authority has no objection to proposed lot 2 ofthe described development being serviced by an off site well,protected by easement. The well to be solely connected to adwellino on þroposed lot 2.

Ministry of Forests, Lands andNatu ral Resource Operations

Archaeology Branch: According to Provincial records thereare no known archaeological sites recorded on the subjectproperty. There is always a limited possibility for unknownarchaeological sites to exist on the property. Archaeologicalsites (both recorded and unrecorded) are protected under theHeritage Conservation Act and must not be altered ordamaged without a site alteration permit from theArchaeology Branch. lf any land-altering development isplanned for the property, owners and operators should benotivied that if an archaeological site is encountered duringdevelopment, activities must be halted and the ArchaeologyBranch contacted at 250-953-3334 for direction.

Ministry of Environment - WaterStewardship Division

No response

Ministry of Environment -Ecosvstems Branch

No response

Page 5 of 6

EAD4

Board Report DVP641-03 July 18,2013

The applicant has indicated that the proposed remainder lot is vacant except for the billboards andsigns currently on it. The applicant has offered a covenant stating that the land will not be used forresidential purposes until the current property owner proves both water and sewerage disposal;however staff cannot support the variance request to waive the requirement for an independent on-site water system and sanitary sewer disposal on the proposed remainder lot because this property islocated in an area with no building inspection and is within a zone that allows all legal uses. lf adwelling were to be built on the remainder lot, staff would be unaware unless a written complaint wasmade to Bylaw Enforcement. lt would be unlikely that a complaint would be submitted unless thecomplainant was familiar with the nature of the covenant. Staff believe that without building inspectionin the area and because the zone within which the property lies allows all legal uses, enforcement andmonitoring of the property to ensure no dwelling is constructed would be nearly impossible. With threewells currently on the remainder lot, staff believe that proof of water for the proposed remainder lot ispossible. Further, the remainder lot is over 2 ha in size and staff believe it is likely that a RegisteredOn-site Wastewater Practitioner will be able to confirm that an adequate sewerage disposal systemcan be constructed on the property.

IMPLEMENTATION:

lf the Board issues this DVP, the owner will continue with the subdivision application and the DVP willbe registered on title of the applicable properties concurrently with registration of the subdivision.

DESIRED OUTCOMES:

That the Board endorse staff recommendation to issue the DVP to waive the requirement that anindependent on-site water system be located on the same parcel as the residential dwelling unit itserves for proposed lot 2, subject to the condition that source contamination prevention methodsincluding fencing and wellhead protection arc completed prior to subdivision and waive therequirement that the surface water source be on the Eligible Sources List for proposed lot 1.

lf the Board chooses to issue the permit, as proposed by the applicant, which would also waive therequirement for an independent on-site water system and sanitary sewer disposal for the proposedremainder lot, staff recommends that issuance be subject to conditions; that source contaminationprevention methods, including fencing and wellhead protection, be completed and a suitably wordedSection 219 covenant be registered on the title of the proposed remainder lot prohibiting building orconstruction from occurring on the property, residential use, and/or further subdivision until such timethat the property is provided with a source of water and on-site sewer system in compliance with the


1. Maps: Location, Site PlanAttached to Agenda

Summary: XAvailable from Staff:

n2. Orthophotograph, Photos

Attached to AgendaSummarv: X

Available from Staff:n

3. Development Variance Permit 641-03Attached to Agenda

Summarv: XAvailable from Staff:

n4. Application

Attached to AgendaSummarv: ll

Available from Staff:X

5. Referral CommentsAttached to Agenda

Summary: nAvailable from Staff:

X6. Public Submissions. if received

Attached to AgendaSummarv: E

Available from Staff:X

Page 4 of 6

EAD5

Eoard Report DVP641-03 July 18,2013

Approval Signature of Rev¡euring Manager or Team Leader

oz/o't /ts

Page 6 of 6

EAD6

Location

EAD7

Site Plan

Å

IIrN

l

89.48'f4'

lür

q'ã

s?'g,,7n

Ëq-l6

N

RÀ{,*" h,úo. ),l

\tî9- a.

6

LOT 4PLAN 1ô263

s.\È

.f /x",',\ /*'97ln ì,

$"3--""

?¡

Yt\.,

ß.+u

"l/

95.0?J7.

29,66J

.p-*bl)'

%À'fó

tu'14

PÀRT LOT 2PLAN 16263

,,9ñ,/

\-/.È/ 'v

///Áf

/ÇY

t/// ,//S'f/6

/Pump-housa Q .t Well .

\"o uír( " i\ rT*Y n

*Y",rfi' \ ^ åfli-',' \%

\*\,-\

4*'a \v**br, "#.)%* ^ *co)''ù '/

/n v.+-lvv

¡\t /p/

/\t\I - \f\ r,tJr\o- d\

[ 1fiouso {"-tìÞ

\-q\ ''t'REM LoT 3 \*f

SFC 6 TP

Pl.¡il,l 1(i2ffj\

LOT 20.583 ho

R 2I W5M

EAD8

Orthophotograph

EAD9

Photos

sed lots

: : : :::: :" ::"'"' ' t: 'Facing northeast at the access to the proposed lots and pumphouse from Highway 95

EAD10

1.

DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT NO. 641-03

OWNER: Mountain Shadows Developments Ltd.PO Box 1846Golden BC VOA 1H0

This permit applies only to the land described below:

Lot 3, Section 6, Township 27, Range 21, West of the 5h Meridian, Kootenay District,Plan 16263 Except part included in SRW Plan 16465, which property is moreparticularly shown outlined in bold on the map attached hereto as Schedule'A'.

Section 8.3 (a) of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 (Bylaw No. 641) is herebyvaried by waiving the requirement that the surface water source for an lndependentOn-site Water System be surface water from an intake in a water source that hasunrecorded water and is on the List of Eligible Sources shown in Schedule 'D' ofBylaw No. 641, that is current as of the date of application for subdivision, only forproposed Lot 1 as shown on Plan 8PP25575 attached hereto as Schedule'B'.

Section 8.4 of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 is hereby varied by waiving therequirement that a groundwater source be on the same parcel as the residentialdwelling unit in respect of which they are required, only for proposed Lot 2 as shownon Plan 8PP25575 attached hereto as Schedule'B'.

This is NOT a building permit.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY RESOLUTION NO. of the ColumbiaShuswap Regional District Board on the

CHARLES HAMILTONMANAGER OF CORPORATE ADMINTSTRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)

NOTE: Subject to Section 926(1) of the Local Government Act, if the development of the subjectproperty is not substantially commenced within two years after the issuance of this permit, thepermit automatically lapses.

3.

4.

5.

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT Page 1 of3

EAD11

DVP 641-03Schedule'A'

KI

îL

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT Page 2 of 3

EAD12

5_UF-QD/,1_51 ON l'_L A.N .

LOT 3, Soc,*6, TprsgQ_LE N A -Y*Q"LS T f I I C

BCGS 82N.026

SCALE 1 : 1000

0r trAlì I nf2/, l? 21, W5M,lPt-AÞ.1 ì62ii).3

pr.AN Epp2557s

0þ20

Tho i¡16¡d6d plot si2o ôl this plq¿ ls 4J2m in wldlh by560mn iñ húigh{ (c 6l:6) rhon plûtted ot o scolø of 1JoCO

86¡dñ9t 6.. ortroôomic oðd qru dr.¡v€d froñ Plcn 1626J,

Thì! pldñ ihowr hor¡¿onlol groondfevd diBloncóô ¡n ñlkôs udôçsolh..w¡se sÞ6cil¡ð4

PARÏ LOI 2PLAN 1626J

I

LOT 4PLAN I626J Cov.ñonts ln lho noú. ot [l] H6r goÌ.3ty

lh? Qucôî in dqåt ol th¿ Provln's of 8r¡l¡shColùmbio os.opr$oñtod by the Mhìst¿r ofTronsp.riolioñ oñd lntro3kùcture o¡d[2] the Cobúio Shuspop R€glo¡õl Districtpurtuoûl to Seotion 2lg ol lho Lond f¡tlo Actor¿ o cond¡tìon ol opp.ovúl for subdlvisloÂ

Th¡8 plo^ ;lot vilh¡n th6 ju¡lldlctlo¡ ol thoApprov¡Âg Oflic6r for th! Uini¡l.t or]?onsportotion oñd h,ro3{ructure.FI. No. 201105256

Ihir plon iìôt *¡t$^ th€ Cohbio ShulwopReglorðl 0¡stricl

IhB field suryly r€presdntld by lhis plon Þoôcoñplôl¡d on thê 26th doy of OcloÞo¡, 2012.iYiliom E. uoddox, BCLS

tEçEl!p. do¡otos slo.dord ion poslo dô¡ot€r .tondqrd iron posl

/ ,, "uo-

\ n"r'p-0 \¿¡oæc

s\4, \Þò-:. \.\ aìì

-..ã\'É'',

Punl7- ,/ ', \hous. O .r Vot ,/ 9'\ \

i/' <"'.'\S\.

\ttf "*''$ì.í l, \q\',/ \ REil LoT 3 \a\

\ - PLAN l8zô.r \{,.\\l*\-¡-

Lol 20.583 ho

R 2'I W5M..É

.d:

+¡."

J50C . folh Slr6èt, Ve.ñon, B. C. vlT 5Ë8

DVP 641-03Schedule'B'

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT Page 3 of 3

EAD13

TO:

FROM:

No: DVP 641-042008-00164AJune 25, 2013

SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit No. 641-04Applicant: Blaine and Darlene HillandAgent: Headwater Development Gonsulting (Mr. Bruce Woodbury)

RECOMMENDATION#l: THAT:in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government ActDevelopment Variance Permit No. 641-04 for Lot 3, Section 31, Township26, Range 21, West of the Fifth Meridian, Kootenay District, planNEP62602, Except Plan NEP68237, varying Subdivision Servicing BylawNo. 641 (Bylaw No. 641) by waiving the requirement that surface watersource for an independent on-site water system be from a source that ison the List of Eligible Sources shown on Schedule D of Bylaw No. 641 toallow a source of surface water that is not on the List of Eligible Sourcesto supply water for proposed Lot A only, of a proposed subdivision underapplication No. 2008-001644, be authorized for issuance this 18th day ofJuly, 2013, subject to the following condition:

1. The AgenUApplicant provide documentation to the CSRDillustrating how water service from the Stacey Creek proposedsource will be provided to the proposed new Lot A, including anyeasements over private land or permits from Ministry ofTransportation and lnfrastructure to construct waterlineappurtenances that are in compliance with Subdivision ServicingBylaw No. 641 requirements.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration: t+ /Ê'r-Meeting Date: July 1{, Z0t3 Charles Hamitton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

The applicanVagent is proposing to subdivide the subject property by creating a new lot on the portionof the property west of Almberg Road. The applicant has applied for this Development Variance Permit(DVP) to waive the lndependent On-Site Water System requirements under Part 8, to allow a surfacewater source, other than those listed in the List of Eligible Sources of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No.641, for proposed Lot A of the plan of subdivision.

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors


Page 1 of5

EAD15

carolyn

Typewritten Text

carolyn

Typewritten Text

carolyn

Typewritten Text

PL BBA 2

Board Report DVP 641-04 July 18, 2013

vorlNG: unweighted corporate n weighted corporate ! stakeholder n(Weighted)

LGA Part 26 ø(Unweighted)

BACKGROUND;

PROPERTY OWNER: Blaine and Darlene Hilland

APPLICANT: Headwater Development Consulting (Mr. Bruce Woodbury)

ELECTORAL AREA: 'A'

CIVIC ADDRESS: 604 Almberg Road

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Section 31, Township 26, Range 21, West of the Fifth Meridian,Kootenay District, Plan NEP62602, Except Plan NEP68237.

SIZE OF PROPERTY: 14.258ha.

SURROUNDING LANDUSE PATTERN: North: Rural Residential

South: Rural ResidentialEast: RuralResidentialWest: Rural Residential

CURRENT USE: Manufactured Home Park/Gravel Pit

OCP: Currently no OCP in place

ZONING: Currently Unzoned

Site Gomments:

A portion of the subject property is currently a manufactured home park. Another portion is an operatinggravel pit. The current subdivision proposal is to create a new lot on the portion of the subject propertylying northwest of Almberg Road. This new lot would be for a single family dwelling.

The existing manufactured home park currently has a water license from Stacey Creek, and the intakeis situated north of the subject property. The property owner also has an existing license issued fromStacey Creek for the portion of the property west of Almberg Road.

Stacey Creek flows through the portion of the subject property lying south east of Almberg Road.

POLIGY:

CSRD Strategic Plan 2008-2012

Section 1.3 states the following policy goal: "To ensure that development is designed and built tostandards that protect human safety."

Under Section 7, Land Use, the Strategic Plan contains the general statement; "The CSRD is

Page 2 of 5

EAD16


committed to promoting and establishing land uses that are environmentally, socially and economicallysustainable that provide for a healthy, livable and diverse community with efficient infrastructure."

Section 7.2 furlher states; "Direct community development in an organized and desirable mannerutilizing sound and sustainable planning principles that reflect the community's requirements."

Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641

Part I of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No 641 (Bylaw No. 641) deals with assessment anddemonstration of potable water for independent on-site water systems. Independent On-site WaterSystem is defined as " a Domestic Water System that serves only one Dwelling Unit."

Section 8.2 requires that where a Water Supply System is not available all new parcels must beprovided with an lndependent On-site Water System. Section 8.3 indicates that the source for thelndependent On-site Water System must be surface water, or groundwater from either a drilled well ora shallow well. The bylaw does not permit the use of any other source of surface water.

Section 8.5(b) requires that where water sources are not on the subject property being provided servicethat easements or Rights-of-way in accordance with Section 9.11 are obtained. Section 9.11 requiresthat an appropriate permit be obtained from MoT where works are proposed within a Highway Right ofWay or a minimum 6.0 m wide easement over private property.

Development Variance Permit

The applicant is requesting that the Board consider:

Waiving the requirements of Section 8.3(a) that surface water for an lndependent On-site WaterSystem be from an intake in a surface water source that is listed on the List of Eligible Sources, asrepresented by Schedule D.

FINANCIAL

There are no financial implications to the CSRD, the DVP application is not the result of a BylawEnforcement action. The cost of preparing legal documents will be borne by the property owners.


ïhe agent has previously submitted a copy of a water license C113876. The Comptroller of WaterRights has written a letter to Mr. Hilland advising that it is willing to apportion sufficient rights for adomestic water supply (500 gpd) for a single family dwelling on proposed Lot A. The source of thewater is Stacey Creek.

Schedule D of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 - List of Eligible Sources, does not include StaceyCreek. The List of Eligible Sources was compiled by staff from the Ministry of Forests, Lands andNatural Resource Operations (MFLNRO) which is the Ministry responsible for the issuance of waterrights to surface water sources through the office of the Comptroller of Water Rights. The list of eligiblesources consists of sources for which the MFLNRO has confidence that unrecorded sources of waterare available, and therefore should a property owner wish to obtain a surface water license to service asubdivision or dwelling, the license would be issued.

Page 3 of 5

EAD17

Board Report DVP 641-04 July 18,2013

The applicant has obtained required permits from the Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure(MoT) for having existing water service lines within the Right of Way of Almberg Road.

The applicant has indicated that he has obtained easements over neighbouring properties for thepurpose of constructing water lines from the distribution box to the various properties serviced from thislocation. CSRD staff has reviewed the many easements that have been registered on properties in thearea for the purpose of providing water service from the Stacey Creek source and have discussed theissue with other some of the property owners affected and are unsure whether the applicant hasfulfilled this requirement in the Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641. As a result, staff arerecommending that the Board consider issuing the permit subject to the condition that theAgenUApplicant provide documentation as proof that water from the source can be provided to theproposed new Lot A.

CSRD staff has been advised by the lnterior Health Authority that all necessary permits are in place forthe water distribution system servicing Don's Mobile Home Park, which is located on the proposedremainder lot of the proposed subdivision. This satisfies the requirements under Section 8.1(c) of thebylaw for the proposed remainder lot as being exempt from the requirement to prove a source of water.

SUMMARY:

The applicant is requesting a variance to Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 which requires that anlndependent On-site Water System be provided for each lot in a subdivision and that where a surfacewater source is proposed that it be from the List of Eligible Sources included in Bylaw No. 641 asSchedule D. Staff are recommending that the Board approve issuance of the DVP as the applicant hasalready obtained a letter from the Comptroller of Water Rights indicating that a re-apportionment of an

existlng license on Stacey Creek would be granted. Staff have concerns regarding the applicants abilityto service the proposed new Lot A from the source, and have recommended that the Board consider a

condition which would ensure that documentation is provided to satisfy the Section 8.5(c) and Section9.1 1 requirements of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641 , if applicable,

NAME OF REPORT(S) / DOCUMENT(S):

1. Maps: General Location Attached to AgendaSummary: Ø

Available from

Staff: n

)-. Site Plans Attached to AgendaSummary: EI

Available from

Staff: I

l. Referral CommentsAttached to Agenda

Summary: nAvailable from

Staff: M

L ApplícationAttached to Agenda

Summary: EAvailable from

Staff: EI

t. Development Variance Permit Attached to AgendaSummary: EI

Available from

Staff: flPage 4 of 5

EAD18


DESTRED OUTGOME(S):


BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse staff recommendation; Development Variance Permit 641-04 will be rssuedonce the applicant has fulfilled the condition.

2. Deny issuance of Development Variance Permit 641-04.

3. Defer.


COMMUNIGATIONS:

Public Notification:

Property owners and tenants in occupation within 100 m of the subject property have been notified.

REVIEWED BY:Date Signed Off

(MO/DD/YR) Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or Deputy Manager

Development Services {"Q tl Zot3 314"8,

Page 5 of 5

EAD19

Location Map Showing Subject Property

Subject Property

çed

,,ggô6"

ËÞÞ98rJ

EAD20

PLAN NEP

LOl 2Þt ¡r ¡€P62602

Å

tN'l

O.F.¡td ia rh Ld Ïtb Olfc. or

ñ¡!-aoy of

-2û-_

Àfryôed 6 þ d@t;6 of rod

LOT 1

Ptar t{?62602 Robút Ltril

A&1oa3 SUBDIVISION PLAN OF PART OFL_OT 3, PLAN NEP626 ,TP 26. R 2f, WsM, KOOTENÁYDISTRÍCT EXCEPT PLAN NEP68257

BCGS A2N.O26

SCALÊ I : l25O

ffi

lb h+# È.t ú. ol Ci¡ pl5 ;¡ 56h h t¡ô Þt{¡h h ùllht (c J:.) rb dôtrd d é *ó or !ùæA úrl*e tro h maÞos dc@l fu oth¡.. d.d

ftc@t¡on

NIì¡€É-RG^Ðrcrd

6 to éoCcotkh of ø

LOt ?2tLN 1á180

SEC J' TP 26 R 2I WSII

RÐ{Al}OlÊ:ôl J

Ftat¡ ¡8P62602

ÂFæôd Or to ddco!¡ôô ôt .d

kio F.d Pædo

^Fovll o. to éldcotió ol rod

ÔêoÞolió %

?Ártì Loi 3êirli ì¡P6¿6c¿

aÐrôYd o¡ rô dhdh ôl ôôõ

ÀPPrOvd qr t0 &úcoll6 ol r€d

Fd ñffi-

^dd.ðsô _--

Ocqotþn

-

L€ëITB€dtur t. artrêdc 6d cr l.r¡yldrroó Prçn MñæOz

. @t€ støâd km æ¡t fodo detd .té@d ¡.oñ Þdt *oO

L *. E- I&& o &¡ti* Cffi M'6Yôycr¡

ol v.-ñú. iÂ grltlù tuè¡o.ê*üly tht I 16. rold d øÉ pdrody!(ryhtãlø lb ffi.r r.For6id Þytil. pbq d &l rÈ ryv.y qrd pb ø.ø.cÈ ;Þ tbH {Yry É. ÊGkld ontÞ ÐiÀ lry ol æÞf, 2æ9. hr tr6rot êffiÞbtod d cd.d. d h M¡i.lfibd !ú. ,1É4J5. 6 h ?lt cotol k.Èr. zæ9.

,tJfie../4^fov*

dr tÞ Ldd mô ActTñi!*&y ol- 20- rHt p{€ô li.! ilfrn th &m¡Ê SþW

8S¡oÉ ürrrkt

Fúlr@-

^d4!.¡

-

o"õãi:W'LLI.A'M E. MADD()X

f rølpørol¡oñ ñ hf rô¡lrsc¡ü.gor¡ F¡lô No. 2OOA-æß4

v5æO . JOS Slr.d. Vdæ¡. B C. v¡f 5€6

FILE: REEE3

!oÌton,oo.cn

ECL

6'o3

EAD21

Site Plan

NC] TO 8T USID TOR RF--I;STABI,ISI.IMIN'r OF I)ROF'RTY BOUNOARIES..Ä,I..1 NISTÂNCTS ARE IN METRES.

/ eurruousr \/ 2.7 ovER r \/ 31.022 I \A ..,7ffi_= I

N *.Ëbâäu, / / lr Irr /"s/ lã i ,,',"-'/g*16 \ Y\-"Ëbu.'.,it$ // te\

\ NzP ---/ / \*ä\

LOri \ ,l'pÁ:'",':,."'^ lg\-t'*uËbåä', )¿. rsiåil.*,0,,,.., \\

-1,ëYN:^4(2rrooEcK) \

)-t --'Yre'4*o''u \Lor 22 / \tt

TRA

REf/ LOT JPLANi/ÏRAILERPLAN45Bo / / NEP626o2

/ #f\ TRALER

\ / /-"Y,"/ß^'

r= J 2.000 -*ts..,\ TRAILER

o=r2.er6 tli\V*zn 'áfLoEct<u+. 'ó\--'oT B.UNDARY AFTERno%,

\ ã9T..Îfi',i'SlT --

SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OFBUII.DINGS AND OTHTR ST RUCI-IJRF SON LOT 3, PLAN NEP626O2, SEC 31,TP 26, R 21, WsIV, KOOTTNAY DISTRICTEXCEPT PLANS NEP6B237 ANI)NEP----- v

'EBroBoo

scALE; 1 : 2000 ouR FILE: RBBB.'lDnrE: 20 Nov. 09 DRAWN: RB

l-lillond

WILLIAM E. MADDOXE'.C. LA.NI) SURVEYOR

35()0 .- 30th STREETVERNON, B.C, VlT 588

TELEPHONE (25O)542-434s

EAD22

Water Supply Plan

HillandWater Supply

e,l:/-rot"r\\tt"

IIIt,lrIIIl-

eùs$̂

l

ê'ìê

\oo g0[-J'.=,

-;:-]--_-_-_-_-_\NL

Junctlon Box r

Propo¡.dLol A

i'::# /.

EAD23

OWNERS:


DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT NO. 641-04

Blaine and Darlene Hilland303 Hampshire Place, NWCalgary, AB., T3A 583

1. This permit applies only to the land described below:

Lot 3, Section 31, Township 26, Range 21, West of the Fifth Meridian, Kootenay District,Plan NEP62602, Except Plan NEP68237(PID: 024-228-788)

which property is more particularly shown outlined in bold and hatched on the mapattached hereto as Schedule A.

2. Section 8.3(a) of Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 641, is hereby varied by waiving therequirement that a surface water source for an lndependent On-site Water System besurface water from an intake in a water source that has Unrecorded Water and is on theList of Eligible Sources included as Schedule "D", only for proposed Lot A of theproposed plan of subdivision of the subject property, as shown on Schedule B,

3. The surface water source is proposed to be from an intake on Stacey Creek, as shownon Schedule C.

4. This permit is NOT a building permit.

AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE BY RESOLUTION NO._ of the Columbia Shuswap RegionalDistrict Board on the 18th day of July, 2013.

AND ISSUED this day of 2013

MANAGER OF CORPORATEADMTNTSTRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)


EAD24

DVP 641-04Schedule A

EÞÊ,9814

EAD25

PLAN NEP

LOr ?F4ffæÞúd i rÈ Ld rrb dîÉ. c¡

ltt-&y èt- ã-

tor ruÉæ leed &bd L¿ú

&pcrd € ¡o 6&.h èr æ

tuàrh Pô¡r& ad¡-

rydôd o! tâ .G.rb of rd

t6fr-&t6.

-

msb:

Fd!dÞ-

SUEDIVISION PLAN OF PART OFLOT 3. PLAN NEP526O2. SEC 31,TP 26. R

-2f. WsM. KOOTENAY

DISTRICT EXCEPT PLAN NEP68237

ECGS a2N.O?6

SCALE 1 : r25O

tbk.*Èt&dúhh tubåhtt.5h 6Ër (s t&) e &tdd. Éd tu$Æ ótæ5 áo b ú.t 4-t tu êthû Ftd

Fur Áø

-

o@9o(b-

fd øtu-

ec$ri$

-

^8d d to &d¡6 or .oéó

^h t.d. hl. TiiÈrr

rd ,\.fi--

&mtu:

ËFõ'îwR

tdffi-

fU ú-lrotqr.rbñ 4 ht..t.ct(.kÍ tb s ,&.*g

. &¡u!æób4l tqfio *!.. .@c t* É.t &.ó

ld¡ þ r.¡;tu ñ @¡& tuw

Ir.4.@.&lSC#dyrF. d Vils ¡ô k¡r¡s æ¡¿<rtlt tM r rq Ë..ür d 66 FFdt.É¡;# h rY.r Èru-rú strñF*mr:ùdtrydFdc@.ê1. ;b ld rry €..dré ê.h5ù4êrdô*.@hþrc.@dêú.4dùMr.ltb¿úfÉq6k766t

4lrb1¿J4

O:.r!d

-

EAD26

DVP 641-04Schedule C

HillandWater Supply

LÈt

l'""1

II,,,IIIt,

EAD27

TO:

FROM:

SUBJEGT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Scott BeechingSenior Planner ll

Development Permit No. 850-12Bobcat Property Development CorporationJason Roe- Applicant

THAT:in accordance with Section 919.1 (1) (f) of the Local Government Act,Development Permit No. 850-12 for Parcel B (See 159348I), LegalSubdivision 9, Section 30, Township 23, Range 2, W6M, KootenayDistrict, for the construction of a new washhouse, new electrical buildingand renovation of an existing utility building, be issued this 18th day of July,2013.

File No: DP 850-12

Date: July 2,2013

: I t ,,APPRovED for Board consideration: /l+ /"Lr** HMeeting Date: July 18' 2013

charles Hamitton. cAo

SHORT SUMMARI.

The subject property is located in Electoral Area 'B' on the Trans Canada Highway west ofRevelstoke. The Electoral Area 'B' Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 850 (Bylaw No. 850)designates the property Commercial, and the property is located within the Commercial DevelopmentPermit Area. This application for a Commercial Development Permit is the result of a BylawEnforcement inquiry. The applicant is in the process of redeveloping an existing campground, whichincludes a new washroom facility and electrical building, and renovations to an existing utilitybuilding; most of the work has been completed. Bylaw No. 850 requires a Commercial DevelopmentPermit to address the form, character, appearance and landscaping of commercial properties toensure a high standard of development for commercial areas.

VOTING: Unweighted Corporate ! Weighted Corporate n Stakeholder n(Weighted)

LGA Part 26(Unweighted)

BACKGROUND:

PROPERTY OWNERS:

APPLICANT:

Bobcat Property Development Corporation

Jason Roe

Page 1 of 5

EAD29

carolyn

Typewritten Text

PL BBA3

Board Report DP 850-12 July 18, 2013

ELECTORAL AREA:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

ADDRESS:

SIZE OF PROPERTY:

SURROUNDINGI-AND USE PATTERN:

CURRENT USE:

PROPOSED USE:

ocPDESIGNATION:

ZONING:

POLIGY:

'B'(Rural Revelstoke)

Parcel B (See 159348I), LS 9, Section 30, Township 23, Range 2,W6M, Kootenay District

3069 Trans Canada Highway, Revelstoke, BC

2.63 ha (6.5 ac)

NORTH TCH /Rural ResourceSOUTH Rural HoldingsEAST ResidentialWEST Rural Resource/Crown Land

Campground

Campground

HC-Highway Commercial

HC-Highway Commercial

ElectoralArea'B'Official Gommunity Plan Bylaw No. 850The property is designated Highway Commercial. Section 5.3.7 of Bylaw No. 850 states:

"The Highway Commercial area is a gateway to the City of Revelstoke and emphasis will be placedon ensuring that development continues to present a positive image of the community, including:

a. The development of an attractive gateway to the community through careful building and sitedesign, landscaping and signage;

b. Efficient circulation of vehicles and pedestrians;c. Effective screening and buffering of commercial uses from adjacent residential uses; andd. Development will be subject to a development permit subject to the Commercial Development

Permit Area (Section 5.4)."

All areas designated commercial by the OCP are designated Commercial Development PermitAreas. A Commercial Development Permit is required prior to construction of, addition to oralteration of a building or structure. A commercial development permit can address landscaping,views from residential areas, parking and vehicular traffic, waste collection areas and safety.

Additionally, any land modification or vegetation removal within 30m of a watercourse (PawlitskySpring) requires a Development Permit in accordance with Section 11.6 of Bylaw No. 850 and theWatercourse Development Permit Area. ïhe owner has applied for a separate Development Permit(DP 850-8) to address the Riparian Areas Regulation. That development permit is a technical permitthat can be issued by the Manager of Development Services. An assessment by a QualifiedEnvironmental Professional (OEP) in accordance with the Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR) hasbeen submitted and accepted online by the Ministry of Environment.

Page 2 of 5

EAD30

Board Report DP 850-12 July 18,2013

Rural Revelstoke Zoning Bylaw No. 2200

HC Highway Commercial ZoneA campground and recreational vehicle park is a permitted use in the HC Zone. The density ofcamping spaces is not regulated by the Zoning Bylaw. The use as proposed complies with the ZoningBylaw.

FINANCIAL:

This application is the result of a Bylaw Enforcement inquiry. There should be no cost to the CSRDas the applicant is addressing the bylaw issues and will bear the cost of ensuring the developmentmeets the development permit guidelines.


AccessAccess to the property is from the Trans Canada Highway.

Sewage DisposalSewage disposal for the campground will be provided by the existing sewage disposal system and agravity septic field.

Water SupplyWater will be provided by the existing onsite water system.

Form and CharacterThe exterior of the buíldings will be clad in Hardie Board, Timber Bark colour, and Arctic White Hardietrim. The roof is proposed to be storm grey asphalt shingles. The washroom and utility building willhave natural cedar support beams supporting the extended eaves at the front.

Landscaping and BufferingExisting trees are to be retained where possible and other vegetation will be consistent with the naturalsurroundings.

Signage and LightingThere are no residential properties adjacent to the subject properties and existing trees are shouldinsure minimal visual impacts. Motion sensor lights are proposed for the utility buildings and lights willbe installed in the eaves for the washroom buildings.

Waste CollectionWaste will be collected daily from bear proof bins and stored within buildings until collection. Recyclingwill also be collected daily from bear proof bins and stored within buildings. Additional measuresincluding lighting and landscaping to discourage bears will be provided.

IMPLEMENTATION

Staff is recommending that the Board issue this permit. Staff will notify the applicant and ensure thedevelopment is consistent with the development permit. A Watercourse Development Permit is alsorequired, that is a technical permit that can be issued by the Manager of Development Services.

Page 3 of 4

EAD31

Board Report DP 850-12 July 18, 2013

The ElectoralArea'B'Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval. The APC also askedthat Board consider measures to ensure compliance with bylaws and DP requirements, includingpublic information/education, fines and punitive fee structures.

LIST NAME OF REPORTS / DOCUMENTS:

DESIRED OUTCOME:


BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse recommendation. Development Permit No. 850-12 will be rssued.

2. Decline rssuance of Development Permit No. 850-12.

3. Defer.


COMMUNIGATIONS:lf the Board issues DP 850-12, staff will notify the applicant of the Board's decision and forward the DPto the Land Title Office for registration on title of the property.

REVIEWED BY:Date Signed Off

(MO/DD/YR)Approval Signature of ReviewingManaqerorTeam Leader

Development Services {^\q '> tLo\z gÈ*o(-

1. Development Permit No. 850-12

Attached toAgenda Summary

ø

Available from

Staff: !

2. OCP and Zoning Maps


ø

Available from

Staff: n

3. Application


ø

Available from

Staff: E

4. Section 5.4 of Bylaw No. 850


ø

Available from

Staff: n

5. Electoral Area'B' APC Recommendation


!Available from

Staff: EI

6. Riparian Areas Regulation AssessmentPrepared by Danielle Backman, dated January2.2013


trAvailable from

Staff: EI

Page 4 of 4

EAD32

1.

2.


DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 850.12

OWNERS: Bobcat Property Development Corporation1 Jarvis StreetHamilton, ON

L8R 3J2

This Development Permit is issued subject to compliance with all the Bylaws of the RegionalDistrict applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by the Permit.

This permit applies to those lands within the Regional District described below, and anyand all buildings, structures and other development thereon:

Parcel B (See 159348I), Leoal Subdivision 9. Section 30. Township 23. Ranoe 2, W6M.Kootenav District (PlD 008-081 -620).

This "CommercialArea Development Permit" is issued pursuant to Section 5.4 of ElectoralArea 'B' Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 850, to allow construction of a new electricalbuilding and washroom and renovation of an existing utility building.

An amendment to the Permit will be required if development is not in substantialcompliance with this Permit.

The development shall be carried out subject to the following conditions:

a. Buildings and vegetation to be sited consistent with Schedule A;

b. The exterior finishes of the Utility Building to be consistent with Schedule B;

c. The exterior finishes of the Washhouse to be consistent with Schedule C;

d. The exterior finishes of the Electrical building to be consistent with Schedule D;

e. Landscaping shall be provided along property lines, the base of buildings andbetween parking areas and public areas and roads;

f. Outdoor storage or waste collection areas shall be screened by hedging orfencing.

It is understood and agreed that the Regional District has made no representation,covenants, warranties, guarantees, promises, or agreement (verbal or otherwise) with thedevelopers other than those in this permit.

3.

4.

5.

6.

EAD33

DP 850-12 Pageã

7. The Permit shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and theirrespective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.

8. This is NOT a Building Permit.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY RESOLUTION NO. of the ColumbiaShuswap Regional District Board on the day of 2013.

CHARLES HAMILTON MANAGER OFADMTNTSTRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)

PLEASE NOTE:

This Permit addresses Local Government regulations only. Further permits or authorizationsmay be required from Provincial and Federal governments.

EAD34

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICTDEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 850.12

SCHEDULE A

\-rr

g

ê

3

rcqoÞ

6iTiú9iã;

I

cl!tItnt

B

.trl¡T

ËrriltltäË,ÍtË.üii ill ,, li Håäuli:¡åg¡,åå üg

EAD35


SCHEDULE B

E

åsãËçËgËå åå Ëå $

eeFsl tiß â$g

säiffiiåååsl¡¡

(5

=EIJaärr¿;FË IIL_.7

EAD36


SCHEDULE C

Ê

rtãå

.EË

iËËt

liåsFã5å åå

.88 I

åR fïl

åi¡åii'å¡ls'årË lu, [ ¡lE! I F$

=t3ËÉ!E*U'=<t=g

EAD37


SCHEDULE D

I.EE

iËËt

L-J

ågå!Ë¡Ëå #å åå

f

8öÍ;ål F

ËiåIåå

åË¡å¡¡

Ë í,',

C¡'

=crJoo

<Hct=EÍsì3-3u¡=

EAD38

OGP Designation

EAD40

g:ãetC\¡

c>cv',

z.-)

F-(D&t-C"õJz-otd

#Þ?4'r¡kffiilã

781

SCHEDULE A-2 OF BYLAW NO. 566-1

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICTMARINE PARK DRIVE NE . BOX 978 r SALMON ARM BC . VIE 4Pf

TELEPHONE (250) 832{194. FAX (250) 832-3375TOLL FEEW¡TH¡N BC ONLY 1488-248-2773

Appricarion/FileNo. yl$ lL d'Ñ

APPLICATION FOR A PERIU1IT

lÂly'e hereby make application underthe provisions of Part 26 of the Municipal Act for a (cfieck where applicable)

Development Variance PermitTemporary Commercial and lndustríal Permit

,þDeveloprnent Permit

to pennit the proposed development as described in the attached form upon (legal description of property):Parcel B, Legal Subdivision 9, Section 30, Township 23, Range 2, Meridian W6, Kootenay

Land District. SEE 159348-l

PID: 008-081-620

dzF.

and located at (street address or generaf location)3069 Trans Canada Highway, Revelstoke BC

Required application tee qf $ ttÙ and lhe completed Permit lnformation Forms

January 28 2013 ._(Date)

THIS APPLICATION IS MADE WITH

January 28 2013

(Date)

Where the Applicant Is NOT the REGISTEREDREGISTERED OWNER or hls SOLICITOR

MY FULL KNO\I1/LEDGEAND CONSENT

OWNER the ApplicatÍon rnust be signed by the

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

APPICATION FEE $ RECEIVED RECEIPT NO.

(Oate) (Slgnature of Offida$

EAD41

PERMIT INFORMATION FORM

THE INFORMATION REOUESTED IN THIS FORM IS REQUIRED TO EXPED¡TE THE APPLICATIONAND ASSISTTHE STAFF IN PREPARING A RECOMMENDATION.

This form is to be completed in fulland Certificate of State of Titfe or of

Applicant and Reqistered Owner

1. (1) Applicanfs Name

Subject Property and DeveloPment

3. (f ) Legal Description in Fufl

and submitted with all requested information, Permit Application. Apptication Feelndefeasible Ïtle for the subject property-

Bobcat Property Development Corp/ Jason Roe

Posta{ Code VOE 2S0Home

Postal Code

Home

Parcel B, Legal Subdivision 9, Section 30, Township Zg

Address PO BOX 963

Telephone: Business 2508377442

(2) Registered Owneis Name SAMF AS ABOVF

Address

Telephone: Business

(3) A æpy of a State of Tide Certitìcate. or a copy of a Certificate of lndefeasible Ïtle. dated no morethan 30 (thirty) days prior to submission of the application must aæompany the application as proofof ownership.

Application Fee

2- An Application Fee as set out in the Columbia Shuswap Regional District fees bylaw shall be made payable

to lhe Columbia Shuswap Regional District and shall accompany the Application-

Ranqe 2. Meridian W6. Kootenäy Land District. SEE 159348-1

Pln'oo8-081-620

(2) Location (street address of property, general description or map) .

3069 Trans Canada Highway

(3) Present Zoning

(4) Description of the Existing Use/Development RV Camp GrOund

(5) Full Description of the Proposed Development (use separate sheet if necessary)

lmprovement of Shop and wash house and addtion of Electrical building

EAD42

;,':'l

Prûpe¡ty:

' ' :'30ûg Trðns Canada HwyÊ#dstoke, BC VoE 2S0

$br¡itted bF ¿e¡ RæPl$oa: Êa8i 8!¿-t?6rEmi¡ ..þmÉ[{fir æ0¡k offihË t ?. 2019

pÐposgd Ohang€6 to the slle.¡nctude:

r. ConeûljÕtio$ a WJity Building, a WâshroomFae¡lily and ãì Becûical Buìlding

2. A na'¡/ aqc€s rcad fhât þacls to lhe UtilityBuild¡ßg

3. PropoqedlÌajb thd providewalking acc8sstô Ìhacreek

4. Restorat&ln arìd lmprovemênt of thê exÌsting icEek

LEEEilO

-. 8ñSFglY UNÉ

MËXr{}F.$TAY

SFTBATI($

gf STlfrlG Eull.lllllGS

n Pflolo€ûDauttuûrss

|*_l_]EnsîMì.ßsaosPROPOS@ ñûADS

- '-\/.'e'

\¡-''

Tran,s Canada HwY (approx)

\ *Lt .^-"'-*'-T'*;/\-'"'t,-.Pî

/'/t'\¿¿h

¡ ncæssrnñ\\l Í')¿

'7--EI"ËTIHTAL

\ \1ì \ \,rl \\

i '*"--.r ftì I ì

\\, "r,

y' r..\Asrl; ,r\ !Í

L0ûûtalc BûAos

ACCESS IBAI| S

EilSTl'¡S IREES

CNEÊK

2.5î/t C{¡¡nûins

05M eoMûms

ETIRIT OT OTM OAIA

(.1

t' r'

.,5

:il \1 \-.å \\ \

r_--. \ v1\ \1\\\1"'\ t\

{ \\\l.l .¿¡

- ¡'fifrr-r*ri

l"f

- ---r t'' l,,t

*r'l¡¡ r:S¡19.94SA,s.,n.úç É€.¡A {,.rid¡orúrÈrr".rs¡¡¡ôn

t;1,000 ¡f pr¡nted Òn 1 1xl7

EAD43

c0LLECïtot{ P0ìt0

* * - *"-*-:ñ'i.; ã:-:-;;-;::;:;;::;Submltlórl bli Jâ$oñ RcoPhoE 12501 814-726dE¡n¡ll. Jrecqbrkbe,c¡o¡to: Dermhe'1?.201?

F¡parian Arêas:

1, Sevêrâl ¡mprovements to the crêek ar-e

proposed.2. Two bu¡ìd¡ngs faìl Wthìn a 30m radius ot a

ripaian area3. Sâe addìtional informatlon subrnittêd

TEGEI{O

PFOPERIY II(\¡E

ÀIÊHT.OF.WAY

t I BürLDt¡¡ûS

l- - *

Boar¡s&t8Ail.s

ûBÊEI(

.TOP OF SA¡¡K

SPËA BOIJNDARY (I ()M)

IAII BUTFER

' . WAIER Ut{É

@ cuwEÃÎS

. ?.5MSOMOURS

0.5M C0¡lrouns

EXIENÍ OF OTM DATA

&z iå0q q ðgJø.lW+,!*-:ù.+, Èc i!Ê :3( c. .rhi&'rrq!'@ .Ð

'...:1--l \,-*--'

I

\'\ -/ ,'\-.:'' ,,/

r{+1

PMFOSEO $TTEÀMEÂl¡K CrlBBt¡

1:1,000 if ÞÌinted ôn ¡ 1 xl 7

EAD44

FmFert!| 3069 Trans Canaclâ l{wyRêvelstoke. BC VoE 2So

S{bârjl[¡d t¡y: Jes$ lìnFPbeq eðnj81.l-746¿É$i¡: JñctliÞlk¡g.cAortc Deaenrbe l; 2012

Lffilscaprng:

1 " Retention of commonly occuring species is

the p$mary goai

2, REvêgetation around the creek is beingpr09{]sad

3. See additional information submitted

LEGEND

PROPMTY UNE

B¡ç}TT.I}Í.TI.IAY

É'xtsTtNG BUtt0tfiGS

@ PRoPosED BurLt lncs

i_-- ì Er¡slNG RoÂos

PRTPOSEÍ) ROÂÐS

t0GÊt¡tGß040s

ACCESS TRAILS

cREfl(

EXIST¡TIG IREES

AREÅ CLEAEED IN ã}11

i ] i In pnoposeo sLopÉsrABuzATtottABEA

PROPOSÉO RE-VEOEÍAIION AREA

4.*^/-*/ \=j::fl-RETAIÍ{ EXrSrl}n TREFq-_ --,. *

¡latrrål gms wheE gxisting onâlÕpè8 and benÊath-existing,træs

))/

r\ . tI '.. .-,¡,1.r",

-. -ì .., ^- .

ì

,,\ ".,f:/î i.*r'

\._.,,' .\"._-1r,

,/îu''-'- \

2.5nñ C0f'¡l0UBs

0.5M C0Nr0uRs

E{'ÍEM OF DIM O.qÏAi'1

(ìr

ir., -"- l"

,-j

.^. ,0

:r' -v

.' )

"ì.l)

I{ATURAI' TANOSCAPIT{G¡

usil{G ExtsTlilG GnAssEs(tow lrAt ]{TEt{Af'¡cE, tow

Maincùred lawn whero cunently existjng

gr.r _::r Ê llia.iaù,06!3t"..,.,.r,!"ts( rr-)Sr ....n1irr.,rrnr¡:trslrri!¡

1;1,000 if prìnted on 1 1x'l7

EAD45

Prûperty: 306$ Tnìns Çanada l-lwyBcvelstoke, BC VoE 2S0

Sùbmitud h!: Jñ RoêPhçnN: r:58,¡ Ell"¡26jEnãr| .j.4?*itihîre c¡llalei Os.{¡rb€r t?. ?012

;rÈÑffi

,þ t, ! ?5rJr0.6P0ri r":rr." i{ ìúizs!. c,*kniotn¡nq:rarEir¡@ì

EAD46

Propertf 3û69 Trans Canada Hr¡./y

Revdstoke, tsC VoE 2S0

SltJnittod bT: Jffi R.ePhon& É511 ßr¿-;26éEmal¡ Jræ$h*.-ç.æD¿tÉ: DP".mhq t 7, Zû1 !

}ESTRIPTÍOI¡ OFUSB

The washroom facility will eplace the existingwashroom laciiities. S€ruice is provlded ior bothmen and women.The washroom w¡ll hook up tothe exßt¡ng sapt¡6 system.

BUTLD¡}IC Dtm$ßtor¡s

Footprinl: 9.1 m x 1 1.3m (1O2.83m'¿)

Build¡ng Height: -5.3m

Rooñng: Malarkey Roofi ngColour Storm Grey

5iding: Hardie BoardColour:Timber Bark

Trim: HardieTrimColour: Arct¡cWhite

Supports: Cedar Beams

rì.rcá¡.rg_#_ !&:tjpæ@,æffi.. irlBrEd#rgælffi

Front Facade

ffiffi

Rear Facade Side Facade

EAD47

Prserly: 3û69Trans Canada l-hvyRevelstokê. BC VOE 2S0

slbn¡tl¿dbË JaM RcêPhwf Ê.itì 814.7261EF¡it Jtr9tnhrF.c¡f).lÊ Dffilb817,2Cr2

ÐESÊ8PT¡8fl OF USE:

The t ül¡ty Building de.s¡gn ìs the same as thewäshroorn facilitiês. The ulility bu¡lding will bêlocked and wi'l house maìntênance equipmanttlawn mowers, tocis, etc,).

Bü¡U'WG omil$¡o¡ts:

Footprint 9.1 m x 10.7m (97,37m,)Buildirg Heiglìt *7.0m

Roofi ng: Malafkey Roofi ngColour Storm Grey

Siding: Hardìe BoardColounïmber Bark

Trim: HardieTrimColoun Arctic White

Supports: Cedar Beams

p ?501ð.0680vG !S e st¡¡@h¡¡4Þgtu¡ffnr

Front Facade

Wffii--L-ffihw..l;ru&;lw'

Side Facade

Rear Facade

EAD48

Propêrtyì 3069 ïnans Canadfl HuiyFevelstoke, BC VoE zst

Sul¡illttcd by: Jamn R.oPhooê: !2hÍjJ81A-'í26!Enalt Jrao,Pblktre raD¡l¿i Decrnhcr 17,2012

.scRlPT¡o!ú 0F usE:

The Electrical Build¡ng will house the siteselècTrjcal systèms. lt wìll be locked to the publh.

EUILD|NG DtMEt{SloñlS:

Footpdnt: 5.5m x 5.5m (30.25mr)

Building Hô¡ght: -5.3m

Roofi ng: Malarkey RoofrngColour:Storm Grey

5ìding: Hardie BoardColour:Tmber Bark

Siding: Hardie ShingfeColour: Timber Eark

r nm: narole I nmi Colour: Arct¡c Whitel

Wffiffi

p.eP-æJ.!6&e. rñrréþ{eiB¡3{Ér.æ

Front Facade

&!dcrôi¿. Êi- ,ÄE 231

Rear Facade Side Facade

EAD49

Pfopcrty: 306çì TÈrrs CanR.jfr HvJ-v

Fevelstoke. BC VoE 2S0

Subm¡nod by: Jeson FcePhonri €fio) 8r4"726jEm¡llr Jør{ hlklre.rî0¡te: De.ôûber 17.20ì2

*r _n!: i ilti'ttalÈttq:rrr"r\¿ q¿ !t:n: c r*rres:r1r n.*lqûr

EAD50

Pr8perly: 3069 TËns Çanadå l1$/yRevetstoke. 8c vot 2sÐ

Submrnôd hy: Jasôn RîePhonrr i25ol 8t¡"¡2luEma¡l J/oo*hlhl;-. c¡Dolor DÊ.amhû 1;,. ?f)r?

EAD51

5.4 CommercialDevelopmentPerrnit Area

ELECTORAL AREA 'B'oFFtctAL corrMUNtTy pLAN, BYLAW A5O

5.4.1 The Commer.irl Development Permit ,Area (CDPA) is daþated underSection 919.1(1Xq of the Lncal Gomnment Act, for the purpose of esrablishingobjectives for the form and cha¡acter of commercial development.

5-4.2 Commercial Development Permit A¡eas include all areas desþated in theOCP for comrnercial use.

5.4.3 The form, character, appearance and landscaping of commercial properties isan important part of what makes a place attractive and livable. Thecomrne¡cial properties in Area B' are located in areas that are hgttly visible(e.g. Trans Carrcødz Highway) andfot focal points within commr.rnities.Anention to desþ derails r¡¡ill ensure that a high development standa¡d ismaintained for commercial a¡eas.

5.4.4 l-andscaping shall be provided:

^. along property lines that a¡e next to public areas;

b. along the base of buildinç that are seen f¡om the public areas;

c- between parking areas and public roads; and

d. rneet Mrmstry of Transporuu.on Standards, parricuJarly, BC R"g513/2004, Provincial Public Underakinç, Reguiation, Part 3.

5-4.5 Views ftom residendrl a¡eas.

^. l-andscaping and buffering a¡e to be provided next ro any adjacent¡s5ids¡d'ìl arsa. The entire setback should be landscaoed in rrees andshrubs.

EAD52

ELECTORAL AREA 'B'oFFtclAL collllMUNlTY PLANT BYLAW A5O

b. I-andscaped berms create a visual buffer. Even a small elevation change inthe ground has an impact Berms are encouraged especially where the

creation of a visual screen effect is desired.

c. Sigûage and lþhting will be revised and managed co maintain the rurallandscape and atrnosphere and to minim¿e visual irnpacts f¡om thehþhway.

5.4.6 Parking, vehicular trafûc and waste collecfion areas.

a- Outdoor storage or waste collection areas shall be screened by fencing,

hedging or landscaping.

b. lfhere landscaping is adjacent to parking or vehicular trafÊc there shall bea concre[e curb to protect the landscaping Êom damage.

c. In parking areas, landscape islands of trees and sh¡ubs shall be used tovisually break up large expanses of parking.

5.4.7 Eristinglandscaping.

a- Integration -ith; or augmentation of, ^ny existing landscaping is

encouraged

b. Retention of existing trees and integating them into rhe proposed site and

landscape d.tg.r is encouraged.

5.4.8 Standards.

b.

Plant material must meet the BC Landscape Standard for size and leaf

density. ffhe BC l-andscape Standard is published ioindy by the BC

Society of I-andscape Architects and the BC Landscape and Nwsery

Association).

l-ow volume irngation is encouraged.

All trees must be staked in accordance wlth the BC l-andscape sandards.

5.4.9 l-andscaping should not create blind spots, potential hidirg places, or screen

wildlife, particularþ next to hþhways.

5.4.10 There may be a need to scteen storage yards or noxious land uses.

EAD53

ELECTORAL AREA '8oFFtclAL cot{rMuNlTY PLAN, BYLA-W A5O

5.4.11 Development shall be encou¡aged to implement strategies consistent withBear Aware and Bea¡ Smart pro$ams.

5.4-12 Buildinç shall create visual interest, usmg:

strong detailing in windows and doors,

no large expanses of blank wa[ and

leçalized khung.

5.4-13 A Development Permit must be approved before construction of, addition toor alteration of a building or structu¡e, excepÇ a Development Permit is notrequired where:

Changes to a building or stn¡cnrre a¡e intemal altemations that do notaffect the extedor of a building, the repa-ir or replacement of roofing.

The construction, altemations or additions of building are:

additions up to 200 square metres (2153 sq.ft.) in areas where the

addition resules in less than a 10%o increase in floor ane ', oÍ

minor external alterations that do not alter or affect parkingrequirements, required landscaping, access to the site, or the buildingfooçrint or have any significant irnpact on the character of the

building; or

the constmcdon or alteradons irr accessory burìdings or strucn¡res are

not i¡r excess of 40 square metres (a30 sq. ft.) where dee total floor area

is no more than 10olo of the rnarn budding, and, provided parkingrequi rsmsnts, required landscaprng, required environmental measwes,

access to the site, and the character of the site are not affected.

Development applicarions for residential developments within a

Resort çott¡nsr.ial desþation (e.g. Mica Creek).

4

b.

c.

EAD54

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDAT¡ON #1:

BOARD REPORT

Chair and Directors


File DVP 2000-71No: EX 2000-05Date: June24,2013

Development Variance Perm it 2000-7 1

Exemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements No.2000'05Drew and Debra Maternick

THAT:in accordance with Section 922 of the Local Government ActDevelopment Variance Permit No. 2000-71 for Lot 7, Section 2,

Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891, located at 8889Swanshore Road, varying Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No.2000as follows:

1. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the interior sideparcel boundary (north property boundary) from 2.0 m to 1.39m for the eaves of the proposed new single family dwelling;

2. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior sideparcel boundary (south property boundary) from 4.5 m to 0.78m for the eaves of a covered porch on the proposed newsingle family dwelling;

3. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the front parcelboundary (east property boundary) from 4.5 m to 3.89 m forthe eaves ofthe proposed newgarage; and,

4. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior sideparcel boundary (south property boundary) from 4.5 m to 2.0m for the eaves of the proposed new garage,

be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to thefollowing conditions:

a) receipt of documentation from the Ministry of Transportationand lnfrastructure (MoT) confirming that a permit to encroachinto the Provincial setback has been issued;

Page 1 of 10

EAD55

carolyn

Typewritten Text

PL BBA4

Board Report DVP 2000-71,8X2000-05 July 18,2013

RECOMMENDATION #2:

b) receipt of documentation from the owner confirming that theretaining wall encroaching onto Eton Road has beenremoved; and,

c) registration on title of the subject property of a suitablyworded Section 219 covenant restricting development of thesite to the proposed single family dwelling and detachedgarage as shown on the Site Plan prepared by BrowneJohnson Land Surveyors, dated October 29, 2012 andreferencing a Riparian Area Assessment report from aQualified Environmental Professional and any conditions itmay place on development of the subject property.

THAT:in accordance with Section 910(5) of the Local Government ActExemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements No. 2000-05 for Lot7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891, varyingSection 2.3.4(3)(a) Floodplain Setback, from 15.0 m from the naturalboundary of Mara Lake to 13.0 m from the natural boundary of MaraLake, for the proposed single family dwelling and detached garage asshown on the Site Plan prepared by Browne Johnson Land Surveyors,be approved for issuance this 18th day of July, 2013, subject to thefollowing conditions:

a) registration on title of the subject property of a suitably wordedSection 219 covenant prohibiting development on the siteunless it complies with the recommendations of the March 19,2013, report by P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., Omega Engineeringregarding flood protection and building elevations; and,

b) that the covenant indemnify and save harmless the CSRD andthe Crown in the event of flood damage to any portion of thesubject property.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration:Meeting Date: Juty 1dh,2013

fl.Charles Hamilton. CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

The subject property is located in an area subject to the regulations of Rural Sicamous Land UseBylaw No. 2000 (Bylaw No. 2000). The applicant has demolished a single family dwelling on thesubject property and is in the process of constructing a new single family dwelling. CSRD staffreceived a complaint about the location of the building activity in proximity to Mara Lake and the Rightof Way of Eton Road and initiated bylaw enforcement action.

Page 2 of 10

EAD56

Board Report DVP 2000-71. EX 2000-05 July 18, 2013

Staff contacted the owner, who was asked to provide staff with more information regarding the sitingof the new single family dwelling building. Once it was determined that the single family dwelling andproposed garage did not comply with siting requirements of Bylaw No. 2000, the applicant made thisapplication for a Development Variance Permit as well as an Exemption from floodplain setbackrequirements.

VOTING: Unweighted Corporate trLGA Part 26 ø(Unweighted)

Weighted Corporate tr Stakeholder tr(Weighted)

BACKGROUND;

PROPERTY OWNER Drew and Debra Maternick

ELECTORAL AREA 'E'

LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891.

8889 Swanshore Road

0.105 ha (0.26 ac)

SURROUNDING LANDUSE PATTERN: North: Residential

South: Eton Road/ResidentialEast: Residential/Swanshore RoadWest: Mara Lake

ADDRESS

SIZE OF PROPERTY

CURRENT USE:

PROPOSED USE:

Single Family Dwelling

Single Family Dwelling

DESIGNATION/ZONING: RS - Single and Two Family Residential

Site Comments:

The subject property is a lakeshore lot along Swanshore Road. The owner has removed an existingmanufactured home on the site and proposes to construct a new larger home, in approximately thesame location as the previous home, as well as a detached 2 car garage.

The property is situated next to Eton Road, which is a Right of Way that was dedicated as a lakeaccess route. The Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure (MoT) has jurisdiction over the Right-of-Way area, but has empowered the CSRD through a License of Occupation to develop the area as acommunity park.

A previous owner of the property had constructed a retaining wall on what he believed was the southside of the property, but that entirely encroaches into the Eton Road Right of Way. The owner hassubmitted a geotechnical assessment for the removal of the retaining wall and its impact on theproposed construction on the subject property. MoT has provided the current owner a letter advisingthat the retaining wall must be removed from the Eton Road Right of Way.

Page 3 of 10

EAD57

Board Report DVP 2000-71. EX 2000-05 July 18, 2013

The owner had a Qualified Environmental Professional (OEP) advise on the proposed developmentplans. The QEP prepared a Riparian Area Assessment Report (RAAR) dated October 29,2012 thathas been filed with and accepted by the Province. The proposed new house does encroach into theestablished 15.0 m Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) at the south west corner,and the QEP has indicated that the owner has committed to establishment of double sized areaswithin the SPEA that will be re-planted with native species as compensation.

The owner has provided a report dated March 19, 2013 from P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., of OmegaEngineering assessing the proposed development with regard to floodplain specifications. The reportindicates that the proposed development can be used safely for its intended use as a single familyresidence.

The property slopes downward from Swanshore Road to Mara Lake. The foreshore of Mara Lake hasbeen extensively reinforced in the past with a concrete retaining wall.

POLIGY:

Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 - Objectives and Policies

The subject property is situated within the Swansea Point Area for which the following general policiesapply;

(i) maintaining sustainability of onsite water supply and sewage disposal systems and protectionfrom the need for a community water system or a community sewer system,

(ii) maintaining compatibility between the residential and commercial land uses,

(iii) maintaining public access to and along the foreshore,

(iv) protection from natural hazards and

(v) community character considerations.

Additionally, the following general environmental objective applies;

ln respect of the environment, it is the objective of the Regional Board to ensure that the growthand development of the bylaw area is properly managed with due regard for the protection of thenatural environment.

These objectives and policies do not contain specific guidance for development, and do not containDevelopment Permit requirements or guidelines to regulate development to implement the policy. Assuch, policies specific to this general type of development apply, however only the policy regardingmaintenance of public access to and along the foreshore would impact this proposed construction asa retaining wall built onto the public highway restricts such access.

Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 - RS Single and Two Family ResidentialZone

The permitted uses of the RS - Single and Two Family Residential Zone are Bed and Breakfast;cottage; home óusrness; Place of religious worship; Single Family Dwelling; Two Family Dwelling; andaccessory use. One single family dwelling is permitted per parcel where there is not a two familydwelling and the minimum area of parcels to be created through subdivision is 4,000 m2 with onsitesewage disposal and on site water supply. The subject property is an existing lot created bysubdivision in 1959, prior to the current minimum lot sizes. The lot is currently serviced by anlndependent On-Site Water System and an On-Site Septic Sewage Treatment.

Page 4 of 10

EAD58

Board Report DVP 2000-71,EX2000-05 July 18, 2013

The RS zone specifies setback regulations by stating that no building or structure shall be constructed,located or altered on a property without meeting the following minimum setback requirements;

1. Front Parcel Boundary2. Exterior Side Parcel Boundary3. lnterior Side Parcel Boundary4. Rear Parcel Boundary

4.5 m4.5 m2.0 m4.5 m

The proposed house does not comply with all of these setback requirements.

Development Variance Permit

The applicant is proposing to vary:

1. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the interior side parcel boundary (north propertyboundary) from 2.0 m (6.56 ft) to 1.39 m (4.56 ft) for the eaves of the proposed new singlefamily dwelling.

2. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (south propertyboundary) from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 0.78 m (2.56 ft) for the eaves of a covered porch on theproposed new single family dwelling.

3. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the front parcel boundary (east property boundary)from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 3.89 m (12.76 ft) for the eaves of the proposed new garage.

4. Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (south propertyboundary) from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 2.0 m (6.56 ft) for the eaves of the proposed new garage.

Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 - Floodplain Specifications

The flood construction level is required to be above the 351.1 m Geodetic Survey of Canada datum forMara Lake. The applicant's Engineer's report indicates that the underside of the main floor level is at352.71m, which complies with the required flood construction level.

The flood plain setback is 15.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake. The proposed new singlefamily dwelling is sited as close as 13.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake.

Exemption to Floodplain Setback Requirements

The applicant is proposing to vary:

Section 2.3.4(3)(a) Floodplain Setback, from 15.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake, to13.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake.

Flood Gonstruction Level and Flood Plain Setback

Bylaw 2000, Section 2.3.4, establishes the floodplain setbacks and flood construction levels.Generally, no building or structure is permitted below the flood construction level or within thefloodplain setback. The underside of any floor system, or the top of any pad supporting any space orroom that is used for dwelling purposes, business, or the storage of goods which are susceptible todamage by floodwater must be above the flood construction level. Structural support may be used toelevate the underside of the floor system to meet the flood construction level. ln addition, structuralsupport or land fill must be protected against scour and erosion from flood flows, wave action, etc.

Page 5 of 10

EAD59

Board Report DVP 2000-71,8X2000-05 July 18,2013

Floodplain setbacks designated under Section 910(1.1) of the Local Government Act (LGA) are noteligible for consideration of a Development Variance Permit, and therefore, if a development proposalcannot meet the floodplain setback requirement, a request for an exemption can be entertained,provided the local government considers it advisable and if the proposed exemption is consistent withProvincial Guidelines and the local government has received a report from a professional engineeradvising that the land may be safely used for the intended use. ln considering whether an exemptionis advisable, and in reviewing the pertinent report and guidelines, local government may make theexemption subject to terms and conditions it considers necessary or advisable. Such terms andconditions may include anything contemplated in Provincial guidelines in relation to the exemption or aSection 219 covenant. ln addition the Board has recently approved policy P-19 to provide furtherdirection in these matters.

As part of the application process, a flood plain assessment report was provided. The report, datedMarch 19,2013, was completed by P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., Omega Engineering. ln the report, Mr. Dunneadvises that the proposed new home can be used safely for its intended use as a single familyresidence.

Building Permits are not required in Electoral Area 'E', and the current Land Use Bylaw does notrequire Development Permits for Riparian Areas, so no approvals would be required by the CSRD forthese works. However, approval of a Development Variance Permit and an Exemption permit willrequire consideration of Riparian Area Regulations.

Riparian Area Regulations:

The Riparian Area Regulation (RAR) requires that Local Government regulate development occurringwithin 30.0 m of a watercourse. Since Electoral Area 'E' does not have a building regulation function,the CSRD does not have the ability to review or approve construction occurring within the prescribed30.0 m area. Additionally, Bylaw No. 2000 does not require Development Permits for Riparian Areas.However, the RAR also defines development as the exercise of local government authority under theLocal Government Act (LGA), and therefore when the CSRD is considering approvals under the LGA,such as a Development Variance Permit or for an exemption to the floodplain requirements, RARmust be implemented.

Since the subject property is immediately adjacent to Mara Lake, which is a watercourse as defined in

the Riparian Area Regulations (RAR), the owner is required to hire a Qualified EnvironmentalProfessional (QEP) to review the site and provide information in the form of a Riparian AreaAssessment (RAA) to establish a Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA).

ln this case the owner has hired Mr. Jeremy Ayotte, R.P.Bio. Mr. Ayotte has prepared a RAAR and ithas been filed with and accepted by the Province, dated October 29,2012.

Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure - Setback Requirements

Provincial Public Undertakings Regulation No. 513/2004 under Section 12 establishes a 4.5 mProvincial setback area from all provincial highways. This 4.5 m setback would apply to SwanshoreRoad as well as to Eton Road. The applicant will need to apply for and obtain a waiver to theProvincial Setback requirement from the Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure (MoT).

FINANGIAL:

The proposed DVP and Exemption application is the result of bylaw enforcement action. lf the Boarddoes not issue the DVP or authorize the exemption, the Board may then wish to direct staff to seek alegal opinion regarding possible court action. Costs for the legal opinion and possible court action,although partially recoverable through Court, could nonetheless be substantial. Staff involvement inlegal action is not recoverable.

Page 6 of 10

EAD60

DVP 2000-71. EX 2000-05 19,2013


The applicant has been in contact with MoT regarding an application for a permit to relax theProvincial setback in accordance with the applicant's survey certificate. CSRD Development ServicesStaff have contacted MoT staff regarding this application, and have been advised that the applicationwill be dealt with at some unknown point in the future and that it was premature to advise CSRD staffon the likelihood that the permit would be approved. Rather than waiting for MoT to deal with thisissue, Development Services staff have taken the approach of recommending approval of the DVP butthat it will not be issued until MoT has issued their permit.

CSRD bylaw enforcement staff were alerted to work occurring both within Eton Road and on the

foreshore of Mara Lake. The owner advised that the work was regarding the proposed removal of theexisting manufactured home and construction of a proposed new single family home. The ownerswere advised by CSRD staff that there was no requirement for a Building Permit in Electoral Area 'E',

but that development works within the 30.0 m Riparian Assessment Area required a QEP to prepare

and file a RAA Report.

The report was filed with and accepted by with the Province on October 29, 2012. CSRD staffreceived a copy of the RAAR and noted that the proposed new single family dwelling and detachedgarage did not comply with setback requirements for the RS Zone, and advised the owner. Since thenew home was being constructed in approximately the same location as the original dwelling, theowners believed the location was "grand-fathered" and were unaware that the new home was in

contravention of the setback requirements of Bylaw No. 2000. lt was also pointed out that the newhome may also be in violation of the floodplain setback requirements.

At the same time as the setback issue was being discussed with the owner, the matter of worksencroaching into the Eton Road Right-of-Way was being discussed between MoT and CSRD Parks

staff. As a result of these discussions a meeting was held between MoT staff, CSRD Parks staff theowner's engineer and Development Services staff. At this meeting CSRD staff was advised that MoTwas considering an order to have the encroaching retaining wall removed from the Right of Way area.

ln response to the various issues surrounding the development of a single family dwelling on theproperty, the applicant has made this application for a DVP and an exemption to the floodplainsetback.

ln order to support development on the property and to limit damage due to flood, in accordance with

Section 910 of the LGA, the applicant has had a report prepared by a professional. The applicant isrequired to follow the professional advice in the report and intends to construct the new house with

measures to reinforce foundation works for a proposed single family dwelling that will mitigate thepotential of flood damage. Another geotechnical assessment of the proposed house design assuresthe MoT that the new construction does not rely on the support of the retaining wall encroaching ontoEton Road.

The applicant has submitted a report from P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., of Omega Engineering, dated March19, 2013, which addresses the provincial guidelines and the recommendations in the report includecertain follow-up conditions to ensure that the site development does not breach any of the guidelines.

These conditions can form the basis for a Section 219 covenant to be registered against the title of thesubject property. Staff is recommending that the exemption can be supported provided the covenant is

registered prior to issuing the exemption.

Page 7 of 10

EAD61

Board Report DVP 2000-71,8X 2000-05 July 18,2013

When reviewing an exemption from floodplain requirements, Local Government may make theissuance of the exemption subject to whatever terms and conditions that it considers advisable. ln thisparticular case, staff recommends that the Board consider issuance of the Exemption subject to theapplicant registering a new suitably worded Section 219 covenant that recognizes the report of theProfessional and establishes the new floodplain setback of 13.0 m.

The owner has retained a QEP, who has had a Riparian Area Assessment report filed and acceptedby the Province. The QEP Report contains recommendations regarding the development of theproperty including the recommendation that certain areas of the lot are to be enhanced by mitigativeand rehabilitative work to ensure that the impact of the development on fish habitat meets the RAR. ltis appropriate that the owner enter into a suitably worded Section 219 covenant with the CSRD thatreferences the RAAR and that the owner follows measures to protect and maintain the SPEA outlinedin the RAA Report from the QEP.

Although the encroachment of the retaining wall, constructed by a previous owner, into the Eton RoadRight of Way would ordinarily be a matter for the MoT to rectify, the CSRD obtained a License ofOccupation in 2009 to establish a community park within the Right of Way area. The size of theretaining wall and the area it occupies within the Right of Way limit the park improvements able tomade to this site. Park improvements scheduled for construction this year include parking stalls, threepicnic tables, wooden fencing to delineate the front and a bear-proof garbage/recyclingreceptacle. For clarity, none of these improvements rely on or impact the retaining wall.

Additionally, Bylaw No. 2000 provides some direction by advising that public access to and along theforeshore is not to be unduly restricted by development, such as represented by the encroachingretaining wall. For these reasons, staff is recommending that the Board consider the removal of theretaining wall as a condition of issuance of the Permit.

SUMMARY:

The applicant is requesting an exemption to the floodplain setback requirements of the RuralSicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000, in respect to replacement of an already removed manufacturedhome with a larger single family dwelling and detached garage on the property. The exemption wouldallow the property to be used for a single family dwelling constructed in accordance with theEngineering Report

The applicant is also seeking a Development Variance Permit to vary the requirements of the RuralSicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000, to reduce the minimum interior side yard, and exterior side yardsetback requirements for the single family dwelling and to decrease the front yard and exterior sidesetback requirements for a proposed detached garage.

Staff is recommending that the Board consider authorizing the issuance of the DVP subject to: theapplicant providing documentation that the MoT has reviewed the issue of the front setback andexterior side setback and has approved the relaxation of the Provincial setback requirement; that theapplicant has provided documentation suitable to determine that the retaining wall encroaching ontoEton Road has been removed from the Right of Way area; and registration of a suitably wordedSection 219 covenant to dealwith any RAR issues.

Staff is also recommending that the Board consider authorizing the issuance of the exemption, subjectto registration of a suitably worded Section 219 covenant to indemnify the CSRD and the Crown, asthe owner has met the condition of providing a report from a geotechnical professional indicating thatthe re-development of the property is safe as outlined within the Provincial Guidelines for floodprotection.

Page I of 10

EAD62

Board Report DVP 2000-71, EX 2000-05 July 18, 2013

Lrsr NAME OF REPORT(S) / DOCUMENT(S):

1. DVP 2000-71 PermitAttached to

Agenda Summary:ø

Available from

Staff: n

2. EX 2000-05 ExemPtionAttached to

Agenda Summary:ø

Available from

Staff: fl

3. Maps: General LocationAttached to

Agenda Summary:ø

Available from

Staff: I

4. Site Plan, Survey Plan


ø

Available from

Staff: I

5. Orthophoto, photosAttached to

Agenda Summary:ø

Available from

Staff: I

6. Engineer's RePort


nAvailable from

Staff: E1

7. Application


!Available from

Staff: EI

8. Riparian Area Assessment Report


!Available from

Staff: EI

DESTRED OUTGOME(S):

That the Board endorse staff recommendations.

BOARD'S OPTIONS:

1. Endorse staff recommendations. Development Variance Permit No. 2000-71 and

Exemption from Ftoodptain Requirements No. EX 2000-05 will be approved for issuance

subiect to the specified conditions.

2. Decline rssuance of the Development Variance Permit or the Exemption from Floodplain

Requirements; staff would proceed with Bylaw Enforcement action.

3. Defer.


Page 9 of 10

EAD63

Board Report DVP 2000-71,EX2000-05 July 18,2013

COMMUNIGATIONS:

This application was referred to the Electoral Area 'E'Advisory Planning Commission. The Area 'E'APC recommended approval of this application. This application was also referred to variousProvincial Ministries. As of the date of this report no objections through the referral process havebeen received. However, a letter from the Swansea Point Resident's Association was received, andwill be presented to the Board together with any other public comments received.


5t7017

Page 10 of 10

EAD64

1.

OWNERS:


DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT NO. 2OOO-71

Drew and Debra Maternick13956 - 188 AvenueSurrey, 8.C., V4A 8J1

This permit applies only to the land described below:

Lot 7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891(PlD: 005-116-724)

which property is more particularly shown on the map attached hereto as shown outlinedin bold and hatched on Schedule'A'.

Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the interior side parcel boundary (northproperty boundary) from 2.0 m (6.56 ft) to 1.39 m (4.56 ft) for the eaves of the proposednew single family dwelling on the subject property, as shown on the attached Schedule B.

Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (southproperty boundary) from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 0.78 m (2.56 ft) for the eaves of a coveredporch on the proposed new single family dwelling on the subject property, as shown onthe attached Schedule B.

Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the front parcel boundary (east propertyboundary) from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 3.89 m (12.76 ft) for the eaves of the proposed newgarage on the subject property, as shown on the attached Schedule B.

Section 2.12(2)(d) Minimum setback from the exterior side parcel boundary (southproperty boundary) from 4.5 m (14.76 ft) to 2.0 m (6.56 ft) for the eaves of the proposednew garage on the subject property, as shown on the attached Schedule B.

This permit is NOT a building permit.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6,

....2

EAD65

DVP 2000-71

AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE BY RESOLUTION NO._ of the Columbia Shuswap RegionalDistrict Board on the 18th day of July, 2013.

AND ISSUED this day of _,2013

MANAGER OF CORPORATEADM| NTSTRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)


EAD66

DVP 2000-71Schedule A

sr\u\-\(/rrll\o

Frac. LS 14

SE of Hwy.

EAD67

Areo of Proposed Housewithin 15m setbock = O.8m2

Areo of Proposed Covered Deckwithin 15m ietbock = a'gnfTotol Areo of Proposed Constructionwithin lSm setbock : 5.6rn2

Site Plon ofLot 7, Plon 9891,

59.93 \ \\(\' --- -.\'\EtonrRood

Reduced building envelope olong Eton Roodos prov¡ded by client over phone Oct 10, 2Ol

tlote: lvell locotion os Providcd\ by client over phone Ocl 29,2O12

LEGEND'- O Stondord lron Post Found

O Concrete Noîl Ploced

, Elewtions ore gêodet¡cr Sidke ploced

+\I\

Sec. 2, Tp. 21, R.8, WOM, K.D.Y.D.Scole 1:25Oso5r0t5m25

All distonces ore in metres.

List of Docr¡ments on titla wh¡ch moy offeclthe locotion of improvements:

None

, i--', :i,ti;')if,c i.::vtir.'t.'r: #jÌ:iâ;i ir.iÎ

BROW{E JOHNSON LAND SURVEYORSB. C AND CANADA LANDSSALMON ARM, B.C. (2s0) 832-9701

File 327-12 Oct 29,2012

\

\Ë_

\

\\Plon 9891 ìÊ

Proposed House Ê

S *-z ,ç6rpge ,.iu '¿ ,' !t- a-:- ----='

q=ÊuLOo?@f

EAD68

DVP 2000-71Schedule B (cont'd.)

ll---lI tt:; I ll

iE I lJ" h lltttlt-l

t---l:.¡l ìÌit Ir¡l

I\ttt

-:::{4Ð".1

T.jl

---t-i

.o!'t!

iiiiI

"*-**'-'1L-HffiIhñMll-ffiLi

/ ...-t/ l.Ijl .;

./u' ll'i''il¡

-.----'l', ii¡

Mþff"f -t t tl/'it'l i; I !I ti I I¡l,i' I i'1".-l ii i I I:l--{#Ë¡

lL--1 !lj----1, 1j-ffiimE!

_._.J-.-.--s-'-'¿Þ$$ntr¡

,;r11

i$ <l

4

IË

':,1'llb. il' ili

DAC D¡JKìN TCÕI{PÀIT,l!*l*.uh!\ññ

ír4. 5r& 296:

=æMATERNICK RESIDENCELOT 7, SWANSHORE ROÀD, MAN.A I.AKE

EAD69

DVP 2000-71Schedule B (cont'd.)

OMEGA ENGINEERTNG sll,rvlon ARùl LLP

CIIILLIWACK - LANGLEY ..- SALMON ARM

OMEGAIIüIIIIfiIIüEffitTlfürfiffiÍ!

March 21 , 201 3

Columbia Shuswap Regional District781 Marine Park Drive NE - Box 978Salmon Arm, BC V1E 4P1

Re: Attachment to the application for a Development Variance PermitLegal description: Lot 7, Plan 9891, Sec2, TS 21 , R8, W6M, KDYDAddress:8889 Swanshore Road Swansea Point

Add¡tlonâl information regarding paragraph 3 - (6) of the application:

The owner requests:

To vary the interior parcel line setback of the single family dwelling from 6.56 ft (2.0 m) to 4.56 ft (1.39m)from the eaves (the foundation is at 2 m from the interior property line and does not need a variance).

To vary the front parcel line setback of the garage trom 14.76 ft (4.5m) lo 12.76 ft (3.89m) from theeaves/overhang (the foundation is at 4.5 m from the front parcel line and does not need a variance).

To vary the exterior parcel line setback of the garage 'trom 14.76 ft (4.5m) to 6.56 ft (2m) from thefoundation and 4.14 ft (1.26m) from the eaves.

To vary the exterior parcel line setback of the single family dwelling from 14.76 ft (4.5m) to 10.59 ft(3.23m) from the foundation and 8.59 ft (2.62m) from the eaves.

To vary the exterior parcel l¡ne setback of the porch lrom 14.76 ft (4.5m) to 6.56 ft (2m) from thefoundation and 2.56 ft (0.78m) from the eaves.

Further the owner request to receive an exempt¡on from the flood plain regulations. Attached is a reportfrom Omega Engineering Salmon Arm LLP addressing the development in regard to the flood plain

regulations.

Add¡tional lnformatlon regarding paragraph 4 of the appl¡cationr

The property is bordering Eton Road. The elevation difference between Eton Road and the subjectproperty is currently picked up by a retaining wall. The proposed buildings however will have foundationsindependent of the retaining wall. The retaining wall will be no part of the base structure of the proposed

single family dwelling or garage.For your information a letter from Horizon Geotechnical Ltd. âddressing this issue is attached.

Head OffTce: 9094 You¡g I{d.. Chillilack BC

Lflnglcy: # I 05 - 6395 I 98'h Strcrct, Langlcy. BC

Salmon Arn¡: 120 - 6tn Street NE. PO Box I 182. Salmon Ârnl, BC

V2P.1lì5 Ph: (604) 795-6652 lrx: (ó04) 795-ó642

v2Y 2D3 l'h: (604) 532-8800 Fx: (604) 532-8893

V I ll 4P3 Ph: (250) 833-5ó43 lrx: (250) 833-5641

EAD70

EXEMPTTON NO. 2000-05

OWNER: Drew and Debra Maternick13956 - 18B AvenueSurrey, 8.C., V4A 8J1

1. This exemption applies only to the lands described below:

Lot 7, Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan 9891(PlD: 005-116-724)

which property is more particularly shown outlined in bold and hatched on the mapattached hereto on Schedule'A'

2. The development which is more particularly shown on the site survey plan attachedhereto as Schedule 'B'; is hereby exempted from Section 2.3.4(3)(a) of the FloodPlain Setback Requirements of Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000, asamended, as follows:

The floodplain setback is reduced, from 15.0 m from the natural boundary of MaraLake, to 13.0 m from the natural boundary of Mara Lake.

3. The Professional report, prepared by P.T. Dunne, P.Eng., Omega Engineering, anddated March 19,2013, is attached hereto as Schedule 'C'.

4. This exemption is NOT a building permit.

AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION NO. of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District Boardon the 18th day of July, 2013.

AND ISSUED this . day of

MANAGER OF CORPORATE ADMTNTSTRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)

2013.


EAD71

EX 2000-05Schedule'A'

SWANSHORE PLACE

oxFoRD ROAD_SWAN LAKE RO,'*$"

Subiect Property

Frac. LS 14

SE of Hwy.

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTR¡CT

EAD72

\\

Site Plon ofLot 7, Plon 9E91,Sec. 2, Tp. 21, R.8, W6M, K.D.Y.D.Scole 1:25OgoSrotSnü

All dìstonces ore ín metres.I

oZl

?€_ \

iärg<q

MoroLoke

YYitnefslron Post

Arco of Proposcd Houscwlthh 15m sttUoc¡t = 0.8m2

Arco of Prço'scd Covsrcd Dcckwithh 15m setbock - 4.#Totd Arco of Proposad Constructlonçlthkr 15m ¡etbock = 5.6¡¡P

39.93 \\\\. _--:\,

\EtonrRood

Reduced building envelopc olong Eton Roodos provided by dlent over phone Oct 1O 2012Túdl loc-otion os providcdby cfient over phone Oct 29, 2012

I.EG-ENDo Studord lro¡t Post Found

O Conqet¿ Noil Ploced

, Eiewtíons orc Aeodetîcr Stoke ploced

lf l.:íi':ina í.nvr,!:.:.'r:'*ii:hc'/. !¿ ì iì

Flle:, 327-12 æL 29, 2012

Lbt of Doc¡¡mcrts on titlc uttich moy offectthc locotlon of Improvcments;

Nor¡c

BROYINE JOHNSON LAT,ID SURVEìORSB. C. AND CANADA LANDSsAr.¡roN ARM, B.C. (250) 832-9701

ProPosed House

i*ON)oocoõ-?q8

oot-c=IDÞØ-cq,É!vmoozÞt-0cn{Ðo{

EAD73

EX 2000-05Schedule'C'

Page ll

OMEGA ENGINEERING su,rvlox ARñr LLp

OMEGAII(liIIIIIIüßrfinfünüfit

March 19,2013

Mr. Drew Maternick13956 188 AvenueSurrey, BC V4A 8J1

Assossment for the proposâd dovelopmont on Lot 7, Plan 9891 , Sec 2, TS 2l, R I,WOM, KDYD at 8889 Swanshore Road Swansea Polnt, BC w¡th regards to FloodPlaln Regulatlons as govsrned by CSRD's Pollcy.l9.

Dear Mr. Maternick.

The purpose of th¡s letter is to present findings and to provide recommendations regarding the floodsafety of the proposed buildings. The CSRD is the local government having jurisdiction and it hasrequested that an engineer's report be provided to determine ¡f 8889 Swanshor€ Road can bê cons¡dered"safe for intended use'with respect to flooding by Mara Lake.

The undersigned has completed this evaluation and report with duo considêrat¡on for lhe requirements ofthe "Flood Hazard Area Land Use Mânâgement Guideline, May 2004" from the M¡nistry of Environment,Rural Sicamous Land Use Bylaw No. 2000 and CSRD Policy No. P-19 titled "Flood Plain Setbacks andExemptions'.

As a Professional Engineer, the undersigned is qual¡fied by training and experience to undertake thisâssessment. The undersigned completed an inspection of the site in March of 2013.

The Zon¡ng bylaw states that the Flood Construction Level of Mara Lake is 351.1 m and that the undersideof the floor structure of a building built within the flood area must be above 351 .'l m elevation. The buildinghas an unders¡de of the main floor level of 352.71m and is therefore in compliance w¡th the Zoning Bylaww¡th regards to the Flood Construction Level.

The required horizontâl setback from high wat€r in the Zoning bylaw is 15m from the natural boundary(348.8m) for Mara Lake. The proposed single family dwelling is for a small portion within the hor¡zontâlsetback as can be seen by inspection of lhe attached legal plan. The proposed garage is not within thesetback.

The buildings are also located within the riparian set back of the Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR). Toaddress the RAR requirem€nts, a riparian encroachment compensation plan has been preparedseparately by Jeremy Ayotte MSc RPBio. Riparian encroachment is therefore addressed by Mr. Ayotteand ¡s not w¡thin the scope of this letter.

For photographs of the site please see the riperian encroachment compensation plan prepared byJeremy Ayotte MSc RPBio.


EAD74

EX 2000-05Schedule 'C' (cont'd.)

Page l2

OMEGA ENGINEERING SALilION ARM LLP

Bulldlng Descriplion:

This building is a new waterfront home with a detached 2 car garage on property at 8889 SwanshoreRoad Swansea Point, BC. The home replaces an old mob¡le home that already has been removed fromthe property.

The proposed home on the lakeshore is a two storey building with an inground basement at ¡ts lowestlevel. The basement area walls are cast ¡n place concrete foundation walls.

The new building basement level is founded below the old original ground elevation for the site. lt isunderstood that the footings are founded on competent undisturbed soils well below natural grade.

Exp6ct6d Flooding and lmpact on Proposed Structure:

A large portion of the property is elevated to above the 351. 1 m mark and is protected by a retaining wall.The retaining wall has an elevation of 351.33m. The two highest measured flood events in the lake are in1972 a1349.6m which is 1.74m below the retaining wall level andin20'12 at 349.58m which is 1.76 belowthe retaining wall level. The proposed buildings are located behind the retaining wall. Since the retainingwall elevation is ebov€ the high water level, damage by wave action or direct erosion is not expected.

Because lhere is no interact¡on between flood waters and the new building, the adjacent properties arenot expected to be adversely affected by the development.

High water, retained by the retaining wall, w¡ll eventually lead to rising water table elevations. The watertable however will not rise to above the high water mark and in a worst case scenario it will rise to3Sl . l m. The underside of the main floor is at 3S2.Tl m which is l .6l m abovê the 35l .1 m FloodConstruction Level. The basement floor is below the theoretical high water table and could be susceptibleto flooding if the ground water level rises up to the adjacent lake water level. When the ground watersrecede, appropriate ventilation and cleaning to allow drying of the basement would be required, Note thatwood or finishes that are within the flood waters may require repair or replacement. For th¡s reason theuse of wood below the 351 .l m is to be restricted to oosts and a staircase.

Because there is the possibility of flooding we recommend that all mechanical and electricalappurtenances are placed above the 351.1m level. lt is understood from the contractor that all plumbing,wiring and heating and cooling equipment will be located above the 351 .1m level.

Development Policy P.t9:

This policy addresses exemptions affecting ñood plain setbacks and explains the approach taken for thegranting of exemptions.

Policy P-19 lists the items that are to bo address€d in professional reports. All ol these have beeneddressed in th¡s letter.


EAD75

EX 2000-05Schedule 'C' (cont'd.)

Pagc l3

OMEGA ENGINEERING sIITv¡OTT ARM LLP

Goncluding Stalement:

The proposed new home can be used safely for its intended use as a single family residence. The newhome is protecled from erosion and wave action by its elevation and location behind a retaining wall, bybeing founded well below natural grade independent of the old waterfront retaining wall and by use olconcrete foundation walls. ln the event of groundwater entering lhe basement, drying end cleaning of thebasement area would likely be necessary. Wood or finishes w¡thin the basement that are w¡th¡n th€ floodwaters may requ¡re repâir or replacement. For this reason, use of wood below the 351 .'l m level is to berestr¡cted to posts and a staircase.

The existing setback distance is adequate and provides sufficient flood protection.

lf there are any questions please contact me.

Sincerely;

P.T.Dunne P.Eng. Seal

GlNEERING SALMON ARMtè


EAD76

Location l:5,000

Location l:2,000

'l-

Mara Lake

Frac. LS 14

SE o{ H{y.

Frac. LS 14

SE of Hwy.

EAD77

Proposed Site Plan Showing Eaves

¡i [ ]1__J

J----]l.¡i:r;l Iiì I ; I r,rlL_f

e¡¡rtrasÍ9-}r;¡FrsÉ!¡i¡9 f*ii=git¡aì¡5!t*i{_ttl.3J4atttl)

ì t- t

*ta

i

:1111

aI¡n(ì

R*å2

';;i'iËi:iIri:rd- ¡;1

Í

r¡

ës

Ì:h',ill ¡

IVIATERNICK RESIDENCE SP'#ç##F#*Iu*ñù¡

LCI¡I7,5'I^TANSITOREROAD, MARALAKE iæ

EAD78

Site Plon ofLot 7, 9891,Plon

Tp.Sec. 2, 21, R.g, W6M, K.D.Y.D.Scole 1:250505rot5mrc

All dístonces ore in metres.1

59.95 \ LEGEND--' a Stondord iron Post Found

O Concrete Noîl Ploced

. Elevotions ore geodetic

r Stake placed

," 7'; r.i.:íí':;n a i.l v:: ! ;.':.' (. ;* ;i:¡ c'.: i ìt'l Î

?e\esla-ç-

"r.-dtg<qMoroLoke

Witnesslron Post

Areo of Proposed Housewithin 15m setbock = O.8m2

Areo of Proposed Covered Deckwithin 15m setbock = 4.8r&Totol Areo of Proposed Constructionwithin 15m setbock = 5.6nÊ

List of Documents on title which moy offectthe locotion of improvements:

None

Reduced building envelope olong Eton Roodos provided by client over phone Oct 1O 2012Well locotion os provîdedby client over phone Ocl 29, 2412

BROW{E JOHNSON LAND SUR\EYORSB. C. AND CANADA LANDSSALMON ARM, B.C. (2s0) 832-9701

Filet 327-12 Ocl 29, 2O12

ËProPosed House S

53/..///,/,//

,_ .(, -_r/1

CN

o!qlã

EAD79

ì\

Fklt

1.ûel

\

1

II

ì1

'i¡t \

Síte Plqn ofLot 7, Plan 9891,Sec. 2, Tp. 21, R.8, [¡V6M, K.D.Y.D.Scqlo l:?50506rø!õø%

¡lll distcnces' ore rh metreo.I

Slor¡dord lron Ps,st Fow¡d

Concrotc Nail Ptoced

FjôrralJons' oru gcodotàc

Slc*ç pfr¡isd

' coniferous

m{o:Íto5oql{D

nooCL

o

¡¡

--7rù.

f".'et of Ilocume¡rts ôn HÎ¡e uhich moy offe.ctthe locotion of irrÞroveYnents

Nonc

Re&rced building ç¡rvelope olong Êton Roodos provided by dlont ovor phone Ocl 10, 2Ot2

: YJell locslion 06 provldtdby clic¡t over phôn8 A& 29, ?Ð12

BROUIHÊ .¡{¡t^tNso,t tÀND Sil,JRllEyORSB. C. AND CANÂDA LA}ÐSSAl.-t'1OH ARlr, B-C. (25O) 8J?--S7O|'

File'. 327-12 Wt 29, 2012

1r1-'lB

'H \*

Plon e8el lä

\It

B\\

\\'.- -- -"xr- -Ëi- ï

Arro ûf Frol¡o€od Ì¡oûÊcu.íthln l$n l*tOocx * o'8rn2

.Areo ol F¡apos€d Cowrod DeckYílhin 15rr sctbock = 4.BnÊ.

-

fotsl Arso al Prçocod Conetructíonrllhln 15¡n setboc¡. = 5.6rnt

cn

o!A¡

ØoÉ5'GIÐoP.

=.=GI

g5mo5no!,CL

EAD80

Orthophoto (1:5,000)

E¡n

EAD81

Photos from RAR Report

Secúion 6. PhotosProvide a descriplion of what the photo is depicting, and where it is in relation to the site plen.

Photo 1. View fiom Mara Lake shoreline toward subject property. The building site is -1 3 m beyond the top of the tall concretretaining wall. Several willow trees have established along the beach. These trees provide important shade and nutrients tofish during high weter in the spring/summer.

Photo 2. The 2 m tall concrele relaining wall has created a sterile section of Mara Lake shoreline along thê front edgê of thesubject property.

EAD82

Photos from RAR Report (cont'd.)

Photo 3. The retaining wall on the adjacent property to the wêst has incorporated a planter to step the wall down. Future repairof the retaining wall on the subject property will attempt to incorporato this planter design and improve the quality of riparianhabitat.

Photo 4. The approximate edge of lhe new houss will be -4.5 m from this large Douglas fir tree. The stake to the lefr of thetree marks the south property llne. The level lot above lhe bulldlng eite has been machine cloered during removalof theprevlous mobile home. This was completed priorto lhis dparian aggessment.

EAD83

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BOARD REPORT

Ghair and Directors

Scott BeechingSenior Planner ll

File No: BL 900-1

Date: July 2,2013

Lakes Zoning Amendment (GSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1

THAT:Bylaw No. 900-1 cited as "Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No.900-1" be read a first time this 18th day of July 2A13;

AND THAT:the Board utilize the simple consultation process for Bylaw No. 900-1and it be referred to the following:

o Area'C'AdvisoryPlanningCommission;. Area'E'AdvisoryPlanningCommission;. Area'F'AdvisoryPlanningCommission;o Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure;¡ lnterior Health;. MinistryofEnvironment-EnvironmentalProtection;o Ministry of Environment - Parks and Protected Areas

Divisiono Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource

Operations;r Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource

Operations-Archaeology Branch ;

o Ministry of Energy and Mines;o Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development;o Transport Canada;o Fisheries and Oceans Canada-Habitat Enhancement:. CSRD Environment and Engineering Services;. City of Salmon Arm;o District of Sicamous; and,. Relevant First Nations Band and Councils.

APPROVED for Board Gonsideration:

Meeting Date: July 18,2013 Charles Hamilton, CAO

SHORT SUMMARY:

The primary purpose of Bylaw No. 900-1 is tofacilities on Shuswap Lake. A new ForeshoreMoorage Facility are proposed.

recognize the existinglndustrial Zone and a

log storage and distributionnew definition for lndustrial

Page 1 of4

EAD85

carolyn

Typewritten Text

PL BL1

Board Report Bylaw No. 900-1 July 18, 2013

Bylaw No. 900-1 also proposes some formatting and text amendments to provide clarification andconsistency.

vorlNG: unweighted corporate n Weighted Corporate n Stakeholder(Weighted)

LGA Part 26(Unweishted)

BACKGROUND:

Federated Co-op applied to renew the existing foreshore tenure to continue the use of four logstorage and distribution facilities on Shuswap Lake, The CSRD received a referral as part of thatcrown tenure process. The four sites are: Lee Creek (3.67 ha); Cape Horn (16.48 ha) near St. lves;Wilson Creek (1.983 ha) between Sicamous and Cinnamousen Narrows; and Two Mile (20.70 ha)next to Two Mile Provincial Park on the Seymour Arm. An environmental management plan, datedSeptember 2012, was prepared by Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd. The application forextension of the tenure was part of the transition of ownership from Federated Co-Op to GormanBrothers.

Bylaw No. 900-1 also proposes some minor formatting and text amendments and adding numberingto provide clarification and consistency.

POLIGY:

N/A

FINANGIAL:

Cost of Public Hearing and advertising


Definitions

The following new definition is proposed:INDUSTRIAL MOORAGE FACILITY is one or more multi-berth fixed or floating dock(s) providing

moorage to an industrial operation.

Table of ContentsThe order of the zones within Schedule A are rearranged accordingly, so that the most commonzones are at the top of the list and the least common at the bottom and the table of contents reflectsthat change.

Section 3.a.2þllnserted the words "or semi-waterfront" after "waterfront"

Section FGl (a)Deleted bracket after walkway.

Page 2 of 4

EAD86

Board Report Bylaw No. 900-1 July 18, 2013

Section FR2 (a)Added "including removable walkway" between "floating dock" and "that".

Part 4 ZonesSections and numbering added to the Zone, and order of the zones changed as noted above.

New Foreshore lndustrial Zone

The new Fl zone is inserted between Foreshore Commercial 4 and Foreshore Park as follows:

Foreshore I ndustrial-Fl

Permitted Uses

(a) lndustrial Moorage Facility, including permanent or removable walkway(s),comprised of no more than two fixed or floating docks accessory to a permitteduse on the adjacent parcel(s).

(b) Private mooring buoy(s) accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(c) Boat launcñ that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(d) Log storage and distribution (including log dumping, log handling, log sorting, and log

booming)

Reoulations

COLUMN 1

MATTERREGULATED

COLUMN 2REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximumnumberof óedhs andprivate mooringbuoys:

Berths:2

Private mooring buoys: 2

(b) Sizeof dock'.

o Floating or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) inwidth for any portion of the dock.

IMPLEMENTATION:

ln accordance with Policy P-18, staff recommends that the simple consultation process be followed.The Bylaw will be referred out to a number of referral agencies after first reading. A public hearing willbe required after second reading.

Page 3 of 4

EAD87

Board Reoort Bylaw No. 900-1 Julv 18,2013

SUMMARY:

Bylaw No. 900-1 proposes amendments to recognize existing industrial uses on Shuswap Lake.Minor formatting and text amendments are also proposed for clarity and consistency.

LrsT NAME OF REPORT(S)/ DOGUMENT(S):

DESIRED OUTGOME:


BOARD'S OPTIONS:

n Endorse recommendation. Bylaw No, 900-1 will be given first reading and forwarded toreferral aoencies.

2. Dectine ri"o*^rndations. Bytaw No.900-1 witt be defeated.

3. Defer


COMMUNICATIONS:

Following first reading Bylaw No. 900-1 will be fonruarded to referral agencies for comment.

REVIEWED BY: Date Signed Off(MO/DDfYR)

Approval Signature of Reviewing Manager or TeamLeader

Development Services á,(t 8,7'01\ ; /S"a-tEnvironment andEnoineerinq (Parks) 7/E/ts

1. Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No.900-1

Attached to AgendaSummary: Ø

Available from

Staff: f]2. Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No.

900-1, Schedule A (amended text)


Available from

Staff: n3. Location Map


Available from

Staff: !4. Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No.

900-1, Schedule B (Overview Maps)

Attached to Agenda


Staff: EI5. Fish Habitat Review and Environmental

Management Plans for Water TenureRenewal, Shuswap Lake prepared byEcoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd.,September 2012

Attached to Agenda


Staff: ø

Page 4 of 4

EAD88


LAKES ZONING AMENDMENT (CSRD) BYLAW NO. 9OO-1

A bvlaw to amend the "Lakes Zonino Bvlaw No. 900"

WHEREAS the Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District has adopted Bylaw No. 900;

AND WHEREAS the Board deems it appropriate to amend Bylaw No. 900;

NOW THEREFORE the Board of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District, in open meetingassembled, hereby enacts as follows:

1. "Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900" is amended as follows:

A. TEXT AMENDMENT

l. Bylaw No. 900 is amended by deleting Schedule A, Zoning Bylaw Text which formspart of the Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 and replacing it with the attached ScheduleA, Zoning Bylaw Text.

B. MAP AMENDMENT

l. Schedule B, Zoning Maps, which forms part of the Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 ishere by amended by:

a) rezoning District Lot 5925 Kamloops Division of Yale District which is moreparticularly shown hatched on Schedule 1 attached hereto and forming part ofthis bylaw, from FG1 FORESHORE GENERAL 1 to Fl FORESHOREINDUSTRIAL; and,

b) rezoning District Lot 2013 Kamloops Division of Yale District which is moreparticularly shown hatched on Schedule 2 attached hereto and forming part ofthis bylaw, from FG1 FORESHORE GENERAL 1 to Fl FORESHOREINDUSTRIAL; and,

c) rezoning District Lot 5954 Kamloops Division of Yale District which is moreparticularly shown hatched on Schedule 3 attached hereto and forming part ofthis bylaw, from FG1 FORESHORE GENERAL 1 to Fl FORESHOREINDUSTRIAL; and,

d) rezoning District Lot 5899 Kamloops Division of Yale District, together with allthat part unsurveyed Crown foreshore being part of the bed of Shuswap Lake inthe vicinity of District Lot 5899, which is more particularly shown hatched onSchedule 4 attached hereto and forming part of this bylaw, from FG1FORESHORE GENERAL 1 to Fl FORESHORE INDUSTRIAL.

EAD89

Bylaw No. 900-1 Page 2

2. This Bylaw may be cited as "Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1."

READ a first time this

READ a second time this

PUBLIC HEARING held this


ADOPTED this

day of

day of

,2013.

day of

2013.

2013.

2013.

2013.

day of

ofRECEIVED THE APPROVAL of the Ministry of Transportation and lnfrastructure this _day

2013.

RECEIVED THE APPROVAL of the Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development this

_day of 2013.

day of

MANAGER OF CORPORATEADM| N r STRATTON SERVTCES (SECRETARY)

CERTIFIED true copy of Bylaw No. 900-1 CERTIFIED true copy of Bylaw No. 900-1as read a third time. as adopted.

Manager of CorporateAdministration Services (Secretary)

Manager of CorporateAdministration Services (Secretary)

EAD90

Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-l

Schedule I

EAD91

Lakes Zoning Amendment (GSRD) Bylaw No. 900-l

Schedule 2

1

F

Seymour Arm

FW

Ginnemousun Narrows

Shuswap Lake

F

From: Foreshore General 1

To: Foreshore lndustrial

EAD92

Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-l

Schedule 3

Shuswap Lake

Wilson Creek



EAD93

Lakes Zoning Amendment (GSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1

Schedule 4

Seymour Arm

FW1

Shuswap Lake

Two MileProvincial Park



EAD94

Location

EAD95


LAKES ZONING

AMENDMENT (CSRD)

BYLAW NO. 900.1-

SCHEDULE A

Zoning Bylaw Text

July 2013

EAD96

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLYFOR PRINTING PURPOSES

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No, 900-1

EAD97

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE A Zoning Bylaw Text

Sectíon

Section

Section

Zone

Part 1

Part22.1,

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

2.10

Part 3

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

Part 4

4.1.

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

4.ro4.1,1,

4.12

4.L3

4.14

4.15

4.16

4.r7

Definitions

AdministrationTitleApplicationConformitySeverabilitylnspection

Contravention of Bylaw

Offence

Penalty

MeasurementsReference Notes

General Regulations

Uses and Structures Permitted in Each Zone

Uses and Structures Expressly Prohibited in Each Zone

Berths

Swimming platforms

Zones

Establishment of Zones

Location and Extent of Zones

Zone Boundaries

FR1 Foreshore Residential L

FRz Foreshore Residential 2

FM1 Foreshore Multi-Family 1



FGl Foreshore General L

FG2 Foreshore General 2

FC1 Foreshore Commercial L

FCz ForeshoreCommercial2FC3 ForeshoreCommercial3FC ForeshoreCommercial4Fl Foreshore lndustrialFP Foreshore Park

FW Foreshore Water

PAGE

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

7

7

7

8

II8

8

Lo

10

1.1.

t2t415

16

18

27

23

24

25

27

29

31

32

33

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1

EAD98

Part l- DEFINITIONS

The following words and phrases wherever they occur in this bylaw, shall have the meaning assigned to them as

follows:

ACCESSORY USE is the use of land, buildings and structures that is subordinate to, customarily incidental to, andexclusively devoted to the principal use with which it relates, which may be on the same porcel, or an adjacentwaterfrontor semi-waterfront porcel, An accessory use does not include human habitation uses.

BERTH is a moorage space for a single vessel at a fixed or floøting dock.

BOAT LAUNCH is a location on a lqke that is designated for the purpose of placing or removing a boat in the water.

BOAT LIFT is an uncovered structure which facilitates the removal of a boat from the water and which can allow for a

boat to be stored above the water.

COMMERCIAL MOORAGE FACILIW is one or more multi-berth fixed or flooting dock(s)used for commercial activitiesincluding rentals and which may be associated with commercial uses on the adjacent porcel(sl.

DWELLING UNIT is a self-contained set of habitable rooms containing not more than one kitchen, but does not includesecondary suites.

FIXED DOCK is a structure used for the purpose of mooring boat(s) which may include multiple berths and may havepermanent links to the shore and lakebed, such as piles or fixed decks,

FLOATING DOCK is a structure used for the purpose of mooring boat(s) which may include multiple berths but whichdoes not include permanent physical links to shore or lakebed, except cables.

FORESHORE is the land between The notural boundary of a lake and the water,

GROUP MOORAGE FACILITY is one or more multi-berth fixed or floating docks providing communal moorage to anadjacent mulli-dwelling unit or multi-porce/ residential development, including a strata or shared interestdevelopment.

HIGHWAY includes a street, road, lane, bridge, viaduct and any other way open to public use, other than a privateright of way on private property.

INDUSTRIAL MOORAGE FACILITY is one or more multi-berth fixed or floating dock(s) providing moorage to anindustrial operation.

LAKE is Adams Lake, Humamilt Lake, Hunakwa Lake, Little White Lake, Mara Lake, Shuswap Lake or White Lake.

MARINA is the use of land, buildings and structures for the docking, berthing or mooring of boats and may alsoinclude boot lounchinEr facilities, sales and rentals of boats, personal watercraft and their accessories, storage ofboats, sales of marine petroleum products, fishing supplies and accessory retail sales, boat repairs, boat building.

NATURAL BOUNDARY is the visible high water mark of any løke, river, stream or other body of water where thepresence and action of the water is so common and usual and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark onthe soil of the bed of the body of water a character distinct from that of its banks, in vegetation, as well as in thenature of the soil itself.

Coìumbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1

EAD99

NAVIGATION is the use of land for the transportation of goods or people over water and includes watercraftrecreation.

PARCEL is any lot, block or other area in which land is held or into which it is subdivided and includes strata lots, butdoes not include a highwoy;

PARK is the use of land, including the surface of the water, buildings and structures for the recreation and enjoymentof the public, andf or for environmental conservation purposes, where

(a) the land is dedicated as park by plan deposited in the Land Title Office, or operated as a localserviceor extended service pursuant to the Local Government Act; or

(b) the land, buildings and structures are undertenure of the Crown forthe purposes of a park;

PASSIVE RECREATION is the use of land for outdoor recreation activities that do not involve the use of buildings,structures, camping or motorized vehicles.

PERMANENT WALKWAY is a structure used for providing pedestrian access to and from a fixed or floating dock wilhpermanent physical links to shore, and may include piles, elevated fixed decks and fixed ramps.

PRIVATE MOORING BUOY is a small floating structure used for the purpose of boat moorage, typically composed ofrigid plastic foam or rigid molded plastic, and specifically manufactured for the intended use of boat moorage, butdoes not include a fixed or floating dock or swimming plotform.

PUBLIC UTILITY is the use of land, buildings and structures for electrical, telephone, water, sewer, gas, cabletelevision, communication transmission facility, or other like services, but does not include any office oradministrative facilities or repair, maintenance or storage yards.

REMOVABLE WALKWAY is a structure used for providing pedestrian access to and from a fixed or floøting dockwithno permanent physical links to shore.

RESIDENTIAL USE is the use of land, buildings, structures and stationary vessels for sleeping, eating and otheractivities generally associated with habitation for more than l-4 consecutive days,

SEMI-WATERFRONT PARCEL is a porcelthat is only separated from the natural boundory of a lake by a highwoy or arailway line.

SHARED WATERFRONT PARCEL includes woterfront and semi-wøterfront parcels, and also includes parcels which areseparated from the naturol boundory of a loke only by common property associated with that parcel.

SWIMMING PLATFORM is a floating structure used lor non-motorized recreational activities, such as swimming, divingand sun-bathing, but not boat mooring. {see Section 3,4}

USE is the use that land, including the surface of the water, buildings and structures are put to and if not in use thenthe use for which they are designed or intended to be put.

WATERFRONT PARCEL is a parcel having a boundary, including a point, in common with the noturol boundary of a

lake.

WATERFRONT UNIT is a dwelling unit on a shqred woterfront parcelwhich has no strata lot (other than commonproperty), dwelling unit or portion of a dwelling unit, or improved highway or park, directly between it and thenoturol boundory of a loke.


EAD100

Part 2 ADMINISTRATION

Section 2.t TITLE

1. This bylaw may be cited as the Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900.

2.2 APPLICATION

1'. This bylaw applies to the area below the natural boundory of Adams Loke, Humamilt Loke,Hunakwa [øke, Little White Loke, Mara loke, Shuswap Loke and White Loke, as shown inSchedule B of the LqkesZoning Bylaw No. 900.

2.3 CONFORM¡TY

L. Land, including the surface of water, the lakebed below it, and the spaces above it, andstructures may only be used, constructed, altered and located in conformity with this bylaw.

2,4 SEVERABILITY

1. lf any provision of this bylaw is determined to be invalid by a court, such provision may besevered and the remainder of this bylaw is not affected,

2.5 INSPECTTON

1. The Administrator, the Manager of Development Services, a Bylaw Enforcement Officer, thosepersons retaíned by the Regional District for inspection purposes, and Agents of the RegionalDistrict are authorized individually or in any combination to enter at all reasonable times on anyporceland into any building or structure to ascertain whether the provisions of this bylaw arebeing observed.

2.6 CONTRAVENTION OF BYLAW

1. A person who:(a) contravenes this bylaw; or(b) couses or permits an act or thing to be done in contravention of this bylaw; or(c) neglects or omits to do a thing required by this bylaw; or(d) fails to comply with an order, direction or notlce given under this bylaw, or prevents or

obstructs or attempts to obstruct the authorized entry of an officer onto property undersection 2,5;

i) may be liable to a fine as set out in the CSRD Ticket lnformation UtilizationBylaw; and

ii) will be liable, upon summary conviction, to penalties prescribed by the OffenceAct.

2,7 OFFENCE

t. Each day of continuance of an offence under section 2.6 constitutes a new and separate offence.


EAD101

2.8 PENALTY

L. A person who is guilty of an offence is líable to the penalties stated in the Offence Act,

2,9 MEASUREMENTS

L. The units of measurement in thÍs bylaw are metric; imperial equivalents are approximate andprovided in brackets for the convenience only,

2.10 REFERENCE NOTES

1. Words found between {curly brackets} are reference notes only and are not part of this bylaw.


EAD102

PaTt 3 GENERAL REGULATIONS

Section 3.1 USES AND STRUCTURES PERMITTED lN EACH ZONE

L. The following uses and structures are permitted in each zone, unless expressly prohibited in thezone:

(a) navigation and øccessory usesto navigation;

(b) passive recreation;

(c) swimming plotform, subject to the limitations set out in section 3.4;

(d) public utility;

(e) park and dccessory uses to a pork; and

(f) qccessory use.

3,2 USES AND STRUCTURES EXPRESSLY PROH]BITED IN EACH ZONE

L. For clarity, the following uses are expressly prohibited in each zone:

(a) residential use;

(b) boathouses and other covered structures;

(c) all other uses and structures not expressly permitted in section 3.1 or in each zone.

3.3 BERTHS

t. The number of total berths shall be calculated by counting each:

(a) dedicated moorage space for a single vessel al a fixed or flooting dockto a maximum of10 m (32.81 ft) of linear length on its longest side; and

(b) 10 m (32.81 ft) of linear length of a fixed or floating dock lhal may be used for the

mooring of a single vessel.

3,4 SWIMMING PLATFORMS

t. One swimming platform is allowed per waterfront porcel, semi-waterfront parcel, or waterfront


EAD103

unitin the FM1 zone, subject to regulations (a)thru (e) in 2. of this section.

2. Swimming platforms:

(a) must be accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent woterfront porcel or semi-

waterfront porcel;

(b) must only be used for possive recreation;

(c) must not be used for boat mooring;

(d) must not be greater than l-O m'1t}l.6+ ft2) in surface area;

(e) must have minimum setbacks of:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcelboundaries of the adjacent waterfront parcel,projected onto the/oreshore and water;

o 6 m (L9.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or park side parcelboundariesprojected onto the/oreshore and water;


EAD104

Part 4 ZONES

Section 4.t ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES

L. The Lakes Zoning Bylaw area is divided into zones with the titles and symbols stated in Table 1.

Column 1 lists the name of each zone and Column 2 states a descriptive symbol for each zonethat is for convenience only.

Table 1: Zone Ti¡. ¿one Itues and ¿one þols

Column 1

Zone TitleColumn 2

Zone Symbol

Foreshore Residential 1 FR1

Foreshore Residential 2 FR2

Foreshore Multi-Family 1- FM1

Foreshore M ulti-Familv 2 FM2

Foreshore M ulti-Family 3 FM3

Foreshore General l- FG1

Foreshore General 2 tG2

Foreshore Commercial L FC1

Foreshore Commercial2 tc2

Foreshore Commercial3 FC3

Foreshore Commercial4 tc4

Foreshore lndustrial FI

Foreshore Park FP

Foreshore Water FW

4,2 LOCATION AND EXTENT OF ZONES

L. The location and extent of each zone is shown in Schedule B of the Lakes Zoning Bylaw No.900,

2. Unless expressly stated on Schedule B, all zones except Foreshore Water (FW) extend 200 m(656.17 ft)from the naturqlboundory into the lake. {narrow portions in Bughouse Bay, SwanseaPoint, Little River, White Lake and Little White Lake have 50 m zones.)

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 10

EAD105

4.3 ZONE BOUNDARIES

1'. Except for Foreshore Water (FW), the zone boundaries on the maps in Schedule B shall beinterpreted as follows:

(a) zone boundaries extend perpendicular to the general trend of the shoreline from thenoturql boundary into the /oke.

(b) where a zone boundary does not follow a legally defined line, such as the naturalboundary, and where distances are not specifically stated, the zone boundary shall bedetermined by scaling to the centre of the zone boundary line as shown on the maps inSchedule B.


EAD106

FRl4.4(1) Permitted Uses

(a) Flooting dock, including removable walkway, that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacentwaterfront parcel.

(b) Privote mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacenlwaterfront porcel oran adjacent semi-waterfront porcel.

(c) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjace nT woterfront parcel

4.4(2) Resulations

Foreshore Residential L

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof docks andprivote mooringbuoysi

o Dock: L flooting dock per adjacent waterfront parcel.

o Privqte mooring buoys:(a) 1 per adjacent semi-woterfront porcel.(b) 1 per adjacent waterfront parcelhaving a løke boundary length less than

30 m (98.43 ft.).(c) 2 per adjacent woterfront porcelhaving a lake boundary length 30 m

(98.43 ft.) or more.

(b) Size

of dock andwalkway:

o Floating dock must not exceed 24 m2 (258.33 ft2) in total upward facing surface area (notincluding re movable walkway).

o Flooting dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the dock.

o Removable walkway surface must not exceed 1.5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any other portionof the walkway.

(c) Location and Sitineof dock, private

mooring buoys orboat lifts:

The minimum setback of a floating dock, private mooring buoy or boot lift accessory to an adjacentwaterfront porcel (and adjacenl semi-waterfront porcel in the case of privote mooring buoys) is as

follows:

o 5 m (L6.4 ft) from the side parcel boundaries of that woterfront parcel(and semi-waterfront porcelin the case of privøte mooring buoys), projected onto the/oreshore andwater.

o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or pork side parcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 tz

EAD107

Additional setbacks far private moaring buays:

o 20 m (65.62 ft)from any existing structures on the/oreshore or water.

o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boot lounch ramp or morino.


EAD108

FR24.5(1) Permitted Uses

(al Flooting dock including removable wolkway, that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacentwaterfront parcel.

(b) Privote mooring buay(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacentwaterfront parcelor an

adjacent se m i-wate rfront pa rcel.

{c) Boat lift(s) that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjace nt woterfront parcel

4.5(2) Reeulations

Foreshore Residenti al 2

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof docks andprivote mooringbuoys:

Dock: L floating dock per adjacent woterfront porcel.

Privqte mooring buoys:(a) 1 per adjacent semi-waterfront porcel.(b) 1 per adjacent woterfront porcel.

(b) Size

of dock andwalkway:

o Flooting dock must not exceed 24 m' (258.33 ft') in total upward facing surface area (notincluding removable wolkwoy).

o Flooting dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any port¡on of the dock.

o Removqble walkwoy surface must not exceed 1.5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any other portionof the walkway.

Location and Sitinsof dock, privatemooring buoys orboat lifts:

(c) The minimum setback of a flooting dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift accessory to an adjacentwaterfront parcel (and adjacent semi-woterfront parcel in the case of private mooring buoys) is as

follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcel boundaries of that waterfront porcel(and semr-wqrcrfront parcel in the case of private mooring buoys), projected onto the/oreshore andwater.

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP)zone or porkside porcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.

Additional setbacks for privote mooring buoys:


o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from anv boat lqunch ramp or marino.


EAD109

Foreshore Multi-Family 1 FM14.6(1) Permitted Uses

(a) Flooting dock(s), including removoble walkwoy, that is accessory to an adjacentwaterfront unit.

(b) Private mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to an adjacent waterfront unit.(c) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to an adjacentwoterfront unit.(d) Boat launch

4.6(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATEDCOLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof docks andprivate mooringbuoys:

Dock: L floating dock per adjacent waterfront unit.

Privqte mooring buoys: L per adjace nI waterfront unit.

(b) Size

of dock andwolkway:

o Floating dock must not exceed 24 mz (258.33 ft2) in total upward facing surface area (notincluding removable walkway).

o Flooting dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the dock.

o Removable walkwoy surface must not exceed 1,5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any other portionof the walkway.

Location and Sitinsof dock, privatemooring buoys orboat lifts:

(c) The minimum setback of a flooting dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift accessory to an adjacentwaterfront unit or woterfront parcelis as follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcel boundaries of that woterfront parcel, projected onto theforeshore and water.

o 5 m (16.4)from adjacent waterfront units, projected onto Theforeshore and water,

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP)zone or porkside porcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.

Additional setbacks for privøte mooring buoys:

o 20 m (65.62 ft)from any existing structures on the/oreshore or water,

o 50 m (164.04 ft,) from any boat launch ramp or marina.


EAD110

Foreshore Multi-Family 2 FM24.7(1) Permitted Uses

(a) Group moorage facility, including permonent or removoble wolkwoy(s/, accessory to a

permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(b) Private mooring buoy(s)accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent porcel(s).(c) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent porcel(s).(d) Boot launch

4.7(2ì Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATEDCOLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof berths andprivote mooringbuoys:

o Berths:20

Privote mooring buoys: 2

Site SpecificDensitv

maximum numberof berths andprivate mooringbuoys wheredifferent from (a):

(b) For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section L8, Township 23, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, plan

KASI797, the maximum number of berths is 67. {Wild Rose Bay}

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to that part of the fractional NE % of Section 19 lying tothe N and E of Plan H698, Township 22, Range 11, W6M, KDYD, except Plans 9L35 and14328, the maximum number of berths is 80. {Sorrento}

For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section 27, Township 22, Range !L, W6M, KDYD,

Plan K4S3099, the maximum number of berths is 60. {Pine Grove}

For the surface of the /øke adjacent to Section Ll-, Township 23, Range 10, W6M, KDYD,

Plan KAS306, the maximum number of privote mooring buoys is L0. {west Magna Bay}

For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section 8, Township 24, Range 7, W6M, KDYD, PlanSPK6LL, the maximum number of berths is 40 and private mooring buoys is 5. {Queest}

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Lot 1, Section 5, Township 22, Range 8, W6M, KDYD,

Plan SPK46, the maximum number of private mooring buoys is L5, {Hirtle Road}

For the surface of the loke adjacent to Section 1-&I2, Township 25, Range 8, W6M, KDYD,

Plan KAS114, the maximum number of private mooring buoys is 5. imid-east shore ofSeymour Arm)

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 to

EAD111

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section L5, Township 23, Range 9, W6M, KDYD, Plan

SPK245, the maximum number of berths is 23 and privote mooring buoys is 5. {Anglemont}

For the surface of the loke adjacent to Lot A, Section 17, Township 23, Range 9, W6M,KDYD, Plan 29240, the maximum number of private mooring buoys is 15. {Popular RoostResort)

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section 2, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan

K4S3482, the maximum number of berths is 90 and private mooring buoys is7.{Hummingbird Creek}

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Lot 12, Section 1"4, Township 23, Range l-0, W6M,KDYD, Plan I7O2t, the maximum number of berths is 22 and private mooring buoys is It.{Noakes Road, Magna Bay}

(b) Size

of dock:o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the

dock.

(c) Location and Sitinsof dock, privatemooring buoys orboat lifts:

The minimum setback of a floating or fixed dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift is as follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side porcelboundaries of that waterfront porcel, projected onto the

foreshore and water.

o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or park side parcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.


o 20 m (65,62 ft)from any existing structures on the/oreshore or water.

o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat launch ramp or morina.


EAD112

Foreshore Multi-Family 3 FM34,8f11 Permitted Uses

(a) Group moorage facility comprised of no more than two/xed or flooting docks,including permonent or removable wolkway(s/, accessory to a permitted use onthe adjacent parcel(s).

(b) Privote mooring buoy(s)accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(c) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(d) Boot launch

4.8(2ì Site Specific Permitted Uses

ln addition to the permitted uses in this zone, group mooroge focility comprised ofno more than twoy'xed or flooting docks, including permqnent or removablewalkwoys, is only a permitted use on the surface of the loke in conjunction withSection l-9, Township 23, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, SPK38. {St, lves}

(a)

4.8(3) Reeulations

COLUMN 1.

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof berths andpr¡vdte mooringbuoys:

Berths:5



maximum numberof berfhs andprivate mooringbuoys wheredifferent from (a):

(b) o For the surface of the loke adjacent to District Lot 5743, KDYD except Plan 16166, themaximum number af berths is 7. {Wittner Road}

o For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section 9, Township 23, Range 10, KDYD, W6M,K4S2919, the maximum number of private mooring buoys is 4, {Bristow Road}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Lot 1, Sectio n 10, Townsh ip 23, Ra nge 10, KDYD,

W6M, Plan KAS420, the maximum number of berths is LL. {Beguelin Road}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section l-5, Township 22, Range 11, KDYD, W6M,Plan EPS162, the maximum number of privote mooring buoys rs Z. {Roberston Road}

o For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Lot 1, Section 15, Township 22, Range 11, KDYD,

W6M, Plan 1.0984, the maximum number of berths is 10. {Gillespie Road}


EAD113

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Lot B, Section 35, Township 22, Range LL, KDYD,

W6M, Plan 35768, the maximum number of berths is i.2 and private mooring buoys is 10.{Deodar Road}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Lot B, Section L9, Township 22, Range l-0, KDYD,

W6M, Plan 1871-, the maximum number of berths is L0 and private mooring buoys is7 .

{Reedman Road}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section 16, Township 22, Range LL, KDYD, W6M,Plan KAS200, the maximum number of berths is l-4 and pr¡vote mooring buoys is 5.

{Markwart Road}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to Section 16, Township 22, Range LL, KDYD, W6M,Plan tt27 , the maximum number of berths is 1"4 and privote mooring buoys is 10. {DieppeRoad)

o For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section L8, Township 23, Range 9, KDYD, W6M, PlanKASL37, the maximum number of berths is L5 and privote mooring buoysis 10. {east MagnaBav)

o For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section 17, Township 23, Range 9, KDYD, W6M, Plan

SPK344, the maximum number of berths is L4 and privote mooring buoys is 10. {EasyStreet/Andres Road)

o For the surface of the loke adjacent to Section l-4, Township 22, Range l-0, KDYD, W6M,Plan 43063, the maximum number of berths is L1. {White Lake}

o Forthe surface of the lake in conjunction with Section 19, Township 23, Range 8, W6M,KDYD, SPK38, the maximum number of berths is 8 and privote mooring buoys is L0. {St.lvesÌ

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to that part of legal subdivision 14, Section 17 lyingsouth of the south bank of the salmon arm of Shuswap Lake; Township 21", Range 8, W6MKDYD, except plan 22555, the maximum number of privote mooring buoys is 2L andswimming platforms is 21. {LaRue lnvestments, Annis Bay}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to the common property shown on Strata Plan

K4S2645, Section 10, Township 23, Range 10, W6M KDYD, the maximum number of privatemooring buoys is 4. {Kate's Cove}

(b) Size

oTdock:o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the

dock.


EAD114

(c) Location and Sitine I The minimum setback of afloating or fixed dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift is as follows:of dock, privatemooring buoys or I o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side porcelboundaries of that waterfront porcel, projected onto theboot lifts: I foreshore and water.

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP) zoneor parkside porcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.



o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat launch ramp or morino.


EAD115

Foreshore General L

4.911) Permitted Uses

(a) Flooting or fixed dock, including permanent or removable wolkwoy, that is

accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent woterfront porcel.(b) Private mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent

waterfront porcelor an adjacent semi-woterfront porcel.(c) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacenTwaterfront

Parcel.

FGl

4.9(2ì Regulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION


o Dock: t flooting or fixed dock per adjacent waterfront parcel.

o Privote mooring buoys:(a) 1 per adjacent semi-woterfront parcel.(b) 1 per adjacent waterfront parcelhaving a lake boundary length less

than 30 m (98.a3 ft).(c) 2 per adjacent woterfront parcelhaving a loke boundary length 30 m

(98.43 ft) or more.

(b) Size

of dock andwalkway:

o Flooting or fixed dock must not exceed 24 m' (258.33 ft') in total upward facing surfacearea (not including permonent or removable walkway).

o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of thedock.

o Permonent or removoble walkwoy surface must not exceed 1.5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any

other portion of the walkway.


EAD116

(c) LocationandSitine lTheminimumsetbackof afbatingorfixeddock,privatemooringbuoyorboatliftaccessorytoanof dock, privote I adjacent woterfront parcel (and adjacent semi-woterfront porcelin the case of privote mooringmooring buoys or I buoysl is as follows:boat lifts:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side porcel boundaries of that woterfront porcel (and semÊ

waterfront parcel in the case of private mooring buoysl, projected onto the /ore shore andwater.

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP)zone or parkside porcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.

Additional setbacks for private mooring buoys:


o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boot launch ramp or marina.

Columbia Shuswap Regional Districl Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 22

EAD117

tG2Foreshore Gen eral 2

4.10(11 Permitted Uses

(a) Floating or fixed dock, including permonent or removqble wqlkway, that is

accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent waterfront parcel.(b) Private mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent

woterfront parcelor an adjacent semi-waterfront parcel.(c) Boot lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacentwaterfront parcel.

4.10(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION


Dock: 1. floating or fixed dock per adjacent waterfront parcel.

Privote mooring buoys:(a) 1 per adjacent semi-waterfront porcel.(b) 1 per adjacent waterfront parcel.

(b) Size

of dock andwalkway:

o Ftooting or fixed dock must not exceed 24 mz e58.33 ft2) in total upward facing surface

area (not including permqnent or removoble wolkwoy).


o Permanent or removqble wolkway surface must not exceed 1,5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any

other portion of the walkway.

Location and Sitineof dock, privøtemooring buoys orboat lifts:

(c) The minimum setback of a floating or fixed dock, private mooring buoy or boot lift accessory to an

adjacent woterf ront parcel (and adjace nT semi-waterfront parcel in the case of privote mooringbuoysl is as follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side pørcel boundaries of that woterfront parcel(and semË

waterfront pørcelin the case of private mooring buoysl, projected onto the/oreshore and

water,

o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or park side porcelboundaries projected

onto the /oreshore a nd water.


o 20 m (65.62 ft) from any existing structures on the/oreshore or water,

o 50 m (L64,04 ft.) from any boot lounch ramp or marino.

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 ZJ

EAD118

Foreshore Commercial l-

4.11(1) Permitted Uses

(a) Flooting or fixed dock(s), including permdnent or removable walkwoy(s) that is

accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent waterfront parcel.(b) Private mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent

woterfront porcel.(c) Marina(d) Boat lounch(e) Boat lift(s)that is accessory to a perm¡tted use on the adjacent woterfront parcel.

FC1

4.11(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof berths or privatemoorino buovs

Berths: tSO


(b) Size

of dock andwolkway:

o Floating or fixed dock (including permanent or removable walkway(s)) must not exceed l-25

m (410,11 ft) in length measured perpendicular to shoreline.


Location and Sitingof dock, privatemooring buoys orboot lifts:

(c) The minimum setback of a floating or fixed dock, privote mooring buoy or boot lift is as follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcelboundaries of that woterfront parcel, projected onto the


o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Pa rk (FP) zone or park side porcel bou ndaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.


o 20 m (65.62 ft) from any existing structures on the /ores hore or water.

o 50 m (L64.04 ft.) from any boot lounch ramp or morino.


EAD119

FC2Foreshore Commercial 2


(a) Floating or fixed dock(s), including permonent or removable walkway(s} that is

accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent woterfront parcel.(b) Private mooring buoy(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent

woterfront porcel.(c) Marino(d) Boat launch(e) Boot lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent waterfront porcel,

4.12(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof berths or privotemooring buoys

o

Berths:50


(b) Site SpecificDensitv

maximum numberof berths andprivote mooringbuoys wheredifferent from (a):

For the surface of the lake adjacent to that part of the NW % of Section 11 lying north of thenorth shore of Shuswap løke, Township 23, Range 10, W6M, KDYD, except Plans 85741,393I, 41437 and K4P76543, the maximum number of private mooring buoys is 20. {westMagna Bay)

(c) Size

of dock andwalkway:

o Flooting or fixed dock (including permanent or removable walkway(s)) must not exceed 125

m (410.1.1 ft) in length measured perpendicular to shoreline.

o Floating or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m {9.84 ft) in width for any portion of thedock.

Coìumbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 25

EAD120

(d) LocationandSitine lTheminimumsetbackof afloatingorfixeddock,privotemooringbuoyorbootliftisasfollows:of dock, privatemooring buoys or I o 5 m (16.a ft) from the side porcel boundaries of that waterfront porcel, projected onto theboat lifts: I foreshore and water.

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP)zone or parkside porcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.



o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat launch ramp or marina.

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 ¿o

EAD121

Foreshore Commercial 3


(a) Commercial moorage focility, including permanent or removable walkwoy(s),accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).

(b) Privqte mooring buoy(s)accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(c) Boot lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(d) Boqt launch(e) Boat rentals

FC3

4.13(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION

(a) Densitvmaximum numberof berths andprivote mooringbuoys'.

Berths:20



maximum numberof berths andprivate mooringbuoys wheredifferent from (a):

(b) o For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Section 11, Township 2L, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, Plan

SPKL63, the maximum number of berths is 50. {Swansea Point}

o For the surface of the lake adjacent to that part of legal subdivision 14 of Section 24 whichlies west of a line drawn parallel to and 50 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from thecentre line of the right-of-way shown on Plan 4402, Township 21, Range 8, W6M, KDYD, themaximum number of berths is 35. {Hyde Mountain}

o For the surface of the /ake adjacent to Section 27, Township 22, Range 1l-, W6M, KDYD,

Plan K4S2L60, the maximum number of pr¡vdte mooring buoys is 10. {Scotch Creek Cabins}

o For the surface of the loke adjacent to Section 17, Township 22, Range l-0, W6M, KDYD,

Plan K4S3359, the maximum number of berths is 55. {Blind Bay Resort}

o For the su rface of the loke adjacent to Lot L, Section 1"7, Township 22, Range 10, W6M,KDYD, Plan 1328L, the maximum number of berths is 55. {Friends Blind Bay}

o For the surface of the loke adjacent to that part of the fractional northeast % of Section L9

lying to the north and east of Plan H698, Township 22, Range 11, W6M, KDYD, except Plans

9135 and 14328, the maximum number of berths is 75. {Shuswap Lake RV Park}

o For the surface of the /øke adiacent to both:


EAD122

Allthat portion of the south % of legalsubdivision 16 of Section 15 lying south of thesouth shore of White Lake as shown on Plan of the southeast % of said Township datedat Ottawa on the L2th day of March, 1917; Township 22 of said Township, Range 1-0,

W6M, KDYD Except: (1) Parcel A (DD 150185F) thereof (2) Plans L3258 and 2296

and

ParcelA (150185F)of that part of the south %legal subdivision 1-6 Section 15 which lies

to the south of the south shore of White Lake at the time of survey of the said lake

Township 22, Range 10, W6M, KDYD as shown on the plan of the south east% of saidTownship dated at Ottawa on the L2th day of March, 19L7 Except Plan20640,

the maximum number of berths is 50. {Sunny Shores; White Lake}

(c) Size

of dock:o Floating or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the

dock.

(d) Location and Sitineof dock, privdtemooring buoys orboat lifts:

The minimum setback of a flooting or fixed dock, privote mooring buoy or boat lift is as follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcel boundaries of that waterfront porcel, projected onto the


o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or park side parcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.


o 20 m (65,62 ft) from any existing structures on the/oreshore or water.

o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boot launch ramp or morino.

Columbia Shuswap Regional Districl Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 ¿ó

EAD123

Foreshore Commercial 4


(a) Commercial moorage facility, including permanent or removable walkway(s),comprised of no more than two /xed or floating docks accessory to a permitteduse on the adjacent porcel(s).

(b) Private mooring buoy(s)accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent porcel(s).(c) Boot lift(s)that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(d) Boat launch(e) Boat rentals

Site Specific Permitted Uses

(a) ln addition to the permitted uses in this zone, fuel sales is only a permitted use onthe surface of the lakeadjacentto Lot B, Section 6&T,Township 23, Range 10,W6M, KDYD, Plan 36807. {Celista}

FC4

4.14(2) Reeulations

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION


Berths: I0


(b) Site SpecificDensitv

maximum numberof berths andprivote mooringbuoys wheredifferent from (a):

For the surface of the loke adjacenlto ParcelA (DD 130350F), Section 29, Township 2i.,Range 8, W6M, KDYD, except Plans 5208, 20081 and27757, the maximum number ofprivote mooring buoys is 15. {Miege Farm}

For the surface of the /oke adjacent to Lot B, Section 6&7, Township 23, Range 10, W6M,KDYD, Plan 36807, the maximum number of privote mooring buoys is 8. {Celista}

For the surface of the loke adjacent to Lot 1, Section 15, Township 23, Range 9, W6M,KDYD, Plan 91"97, the maximum number of privote mooring buoys is 3. {Sunbum}

(c) Size

of dock:o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.8a ft) in width for any portion of the

dock.

Columbia Shuswap Regional Districl Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 ¿Y

EAD124

(d) Location and Sitine I The minimum setback of a floating or fixed dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift is as follows:of dock, privqtemooring buoys or I o 5 m (16.4 ft)from the side porcelboundaries of that waterfront porcel, projected onto theboot lifts: I foreshore and water.

o 6 m (19.69 ft)from a Foreshore Park (FP)zone or porkside parcelboundaries projectedonto the/oreshore and water.



o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat launch ramp or marina.


EAD125

Foreshore lndustrial FI4.1511) Permitted Uses

(f) lndustriol Mooroge Facility, including permanent or removable wolkway(s),comprised of no more than twoÍxed or floating docks accessory to a permitteduse on the adjacen| pørcel(s).

(g) Private mooring buoy(s)accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(h) Boqt launch that is accessory to a permitted use on the adjacent parcel(s).(i) Log storage and distribution (including log dumping, log handling, log sorting, and

log booming)

4.15(2) Resulations

COLUMN 1.

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2

REGULATION


Berths:2


(b) Size

of dock:o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the

dock.

Columbia Shuswap Regional Disirict Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 31

EAD126

Foreshore Park

4.16(21 Reeulations

FP4.16(1) Permitted Uses

(a) Pork(b) Flooting or fixed dock(s), including permqnent or removoble walkway(s/, that is

accessory ïo a park use(c) Park mooring and recreation facilities(d) Buoy(s) that is accessory to a pørk use(e) Boot lift(s)that is accessory to a pork use(f) Boat lounch that is accessory lo a pork use

COLUMN 1

MATTER REGULATED

COLUMN 2REGULATION

(a) Size

of dock andwalkwoy:

o Floating or fixed dock must not exceed 24 m2 (253.33 ft2) in total upward facing surfacearea (not including permanent or removable wolkway).

o Flooting or fixed dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.8a ft) in width for any portion of thedock.

o Permonent or removoble walkwoy surface must not exceed 1.5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for anyother portion of the walkway.

(b) Location and Sitineof dock, buoys orboat lifts:

The minimum setback of a floating or fixed dock, buoy or boat /y't accessory to an pørk use is as

follows:

o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the adjacenl woterfront parcelside boundaries, projected onto the


Additional setbacks for buoys:

o 20 m (65.62 ft) from any existing structures on the /ores hore or water.

o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat lqunch ramp or marinq.

Columbia Shuswap Regional District Lakes Zoning Amendment (CSRD) Bylaw No. 900-1 5¿

EAD127

â€!-006 'oN lt ËlÁg 6USC) luaupusutv 6uruo7 se¡e1¡r¡l1sr.g leuogõeg der\^6ñr{S elgumlop

aoltÐø.lqþN h)üa$øatx.a¿ã,Ais.sÐd (e)

ffi

JAIPM AJO'tISAJOJ/I'TJEAD128

ELECTORAL AREAS - Columbia Shuswap Regional District

Documents

Transcript of ELECTORAL AREAS - Columbia Shuswap Regional District