DHARMENDE R RANA - District Courts

FIR No. 20/2014 PS Special Cell

U/s 120B/307/468/471 IPC & 25 Arms Act State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bhamba

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl PP for State through VC.

Sh. Ankit Karna, Ld. proxy counsel for

applicant/accused through VC.

Proceedings done through video conferencing. It is certified that link was working properly and no

grievance was agitated by either of the counsel in this regard.

Present is an application moved on behalf of

applicant/accused Raj Kumar @ Bhamba for grant of interim bail.

At this stage, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused seeks

permission to withdraw the instant bail application with liberty to move

afresh in accordance to law.

In view of the submissions made, the instant bail

application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Application is disposed off accordingly.

Instant order be uploaded on the court website

immediately.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02, NDD/PHC/New Delhi 12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA

Digitally signed by DHARMENDER RANA Date: 2021.07.12 15:12:08 +05'30'


U/s 489B/489C/120B/34 IPC State Vs. Narul

12.07.2021


Sh. Bishnu Kumar, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused

through VC.




applicant/accused Narul for grant of bail.

Ld. Addl. PP seeks a short adjournment as reply has not

been filed by the IO.

Concerned IO is directed to file reply to the instant bail

application.

As prayed, list the bail application for reply and

arguments on 13.07.2021.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02, NDD/PHC/New Delhi

12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1456/2021 FIR No. 141/2021

PS Special Cell U/s 419/420/468/471/120B/34 IPC & 66D IT Act

State Vs. SK Ramiz Uddin Nawaz 12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl PP for State through VC. Sh. Chandra Shekhar, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused through VC. IO Insp. Praveen through VC.




applicant/accused SK Ramizuddin Nawaz for grant of bail.

Ld. counsel for applicant/accused seeks a short

adjournment to address arguments on the instant bail application.

As prayed, list the bail application for arguments on

14.07.2021.

,


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1395/2021 State v. Rohit Solanki FIR No. 84/2021 PS Special Cell U/s 406/420/468/471/120B/34 IPC & 66C/66D IT Act

12.07.2021


Sh. Sanjay Singh, Ld. counsel for applicant Sanjay

Sinha through VC.

IO Insp. Praveen through VC.



Present is an application moved on behalf of applicant

Rohit Solanki for grant of anticipatory bail. It is submitted that applicant

is absolutely innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged

in the FIR. It is submitted that applicant is neither the owner nor

employee of the alleged firm; his name cropped up in the FIR merely

on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused persons and all

other co-accused persons have already been released on bail. It is

submitted that applicant undertakes to abide by any term or condition

imposed by this court while granting him anticipatory bail.

Ld. Addl. PP has vehemently opposed the bail

application arguing that applicant/accused is a part of criminal

syndicate involved in cheating gullible citizens impersonating

themselves as Google, Amazon and Apple representatives. It is

submitted that applicant/accused was active in whatsapp group

“ Money heist Janak Puri” and in other whatsapp groups, namely,

Sethi Ji Milk Zone, Kapil Group, Kashif Cables and Wire, Vishesh

Calls etc wherein crucial information were provided to the group

members i.e. the IOS call details. It is submitted that on analysis of

whatsapp chats with other accused persons, it has been revealed that

the other accused persons were providing Bitcoin details and gift card

details to the applicant/accused and he was giving directions to them.

It is submitted that applicant/accused is one of the main accused

persons who were operating and running the call centre; he is the

direct beneficiary so the trail of money is to be required to be

established; transactions in Bitcoin and gift cards were being done

and it is to be recovered and identified through applicant/accused

Rohit Solanki and laptop and mobile phones and other electronic

instruments are yet to be recovered for which custodial interrogation

of applicant/accused is very much required. Hence, his bail

application deserves to be dismissed.

The modus operandi of the alleged offence suggests

meticulous planning and deft execution. From the whatsapp chats

seized by the IO, the applicant/accused appears to be the main

kingpin behind the alleged call centre. In my considered opinion,

sustained custodial interrogation of applicant/accused seems

desirable for establishing the money trail and for unearthing the entire

conspiracy. The application is accordingly found to be bereft of any

merits and the same is accordingly dismissed.

Application is accordingly disposed off.


immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 501/2021 State v. Ajay Chandra FIR No. 101/2015 PS EOW U/s 406/420/409/120B IPC

12.07.2021


Insp. Bijay Kumar is present through VC.



Present is an application u/s 439(2) CrPC moved on

behalf of State against the bail order dated 13.01.2021 of Ld. CMM

whereby accused Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra have been

granted bail.

As prayed by Ld. Addl. PP, list the application for

consideration on 03.08.2021.


DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1459/2021 FIR No. 80/2019

PS EOW Mandir Marg State Vs. Sorav Gupta

12.07.2021


IO Insp. Pawan Kumar present through VC.

Sh. Nitin K. Gupta, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused

persons through VC.

Sh. Nikunj Arora, Ld. counsel for complainant through

VC.

Complainants Amit Vohra, Neha Vohra, Puneet Agrawal, Deepak Uniyal, Guddi Uniyal, Hitesh Jadon, Aradhna Singh are represent through VC. Proceedings done through video conferencing. It is certified that link was working properly and no



applicant/accused Sorav Gupta for grant of anticipatory bail.

It is jointly proposed by Ld. counsel for both the parties that

they are ready and willing to settle all the disputes amicably pending

between the parties.

In view of the submissions made, both the parties are

directed to appear before Ld. Mediation Incharge, Mediation Cell on

16.07.2021.

List the matter for outcome of mediation proceedings on

13.08.2021.

No coercive action be taken against the applicant/accused

till the disposal of the mediation proceedings.

Copy of the order be given dasti.


DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1457/2021

State v. Vijay Kumar

FIR No. 136/2021

U/s 419/420 IPC

PS Special Cell

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC. Sh. A. K. Dubey, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused through VC. IO SI Suneel Siddhu present through VC.

Proceedings done through video conferencing.

It is certified that link was working properly and no



applicant/accused Vijay Kumar for grant of bail. It is submitted that

applicant/accused is a young boy of 21 years of age and is permanent

resident of Uttar Pradesh pursuing D. Pharma. It is submitted that the

applicant/accused has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is

languishing in j.c since 31.05.2021. It is submitted that in order to earn

his livelihood, the applicant/accused was doing part time job in the shop

of co-accused and was not aware of any ill motives of his owner. It is

submitted that investigation qua the applicant/accused is already

complete and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him behind

the bars. It is submitted that main accused Dilip Kumar has already been

enlarged on bail vide order dated 01.07.2021. It is thus prayed that on

the grounds of parity, he may also be released on bail.

Ld. Addl. PP has vehemently opposed the bail application

arguing that the complainant in the instant matter got the number

9580712752 from social media who was providing life saving injections

for covid patients; he contacted on the said number who demanded

Rs.40,200/- which was deposited by the complainant in an account of

South Indian Bank but the complainant was neither provided with

injection nor his money was refunded back to him. It is submitted that

during investigation, the CAF and CDR of said mobile number was found

to be registered in the name of Sushil with mobile number 6306763579

used for customer signature and sim was purchased from Ramu

Telecom, Mobile number 8009859555 and the said mobile numbers

were found to be registered in the name of Pankaj Kumar and Rahul but

photographs in all three CAF were found to be same. It is submitted that

accused/applicant Vijay Kumar was arrested alongwith co-accused Dilip

and Kamal Kumar were arrested and eight mobile phones, one laptop,

five sim cards, one rubber stamp were recovered from their possession.

It is submitted that accused Dilip is the mastermind who runs a mobile

shop in Bhagwant Nagar, Uttar Pradesh; he used to forge the

documents/Aadhar cards of the customers for registration of alleged

mobile numbers and used the photograph of present applicant/accused

Vijay Kumar who works for accused Dilip. It is submitted that

applicant/accused has full knowledge about the forgery and got issued

the alleged sim cards and its alternate numbers by giving his consent. It

is submitted that investigation in the present case is at initial stage and if

applicant/accused is released on bail, he may hamper the fair course of

investigation.

Addl. PP for State fairly concedes that the

applicant/accused has no role in the alleged offence of cheating under

investigation in the present case. He further submits that the alleged

forgery/cheating in procuring the sim cards upon the strength of forged

and fabricated documents is an independent, distinct and separate

offence for which police is required to initiate appropriate action

seperately.

Considering the fact that the applicant/accused is admitted

to be not involved in the offence of cheating under investigation and the

co-accused has already been granted bail, applicant/accused Vijay

Kumar is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of

Rs.20,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction

of Ld. MM/Link MM/Duty MM.


Needless to say that nothing observed herein shall

tantamount to an expression upon the merits of the case.


immediately.

(Dharmender Rana ) ASJ-02/NDD/PHC/ND

12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1454/2021 State v. Pankaj


U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State through VC.

Sh. Dinesh, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused through

VC.

IO SI Narender is present through VC.




applicant/accused Pankaj for grant of bail. It is submitted that

applicant/accused has been falsely implicated in the present case as

he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and that he is

languishing in j.c since 10.06.2021. It is submitted that

applicant/accused has been arrested in the present case merely on

the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused Mohit who was

wanted in many cases. It is submitted that recovery has been planted

upon him as nothing incriminating has come on record to connect the

applicant/accused with the alleged offence. It is submitted that

investigation qua the applicant/accused is already complete and no

fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars.

Ld. Addl. PP has vehemently opposed the bail

application arguing that applicant/accused is an active member of

Jitender @ Gogi gang; he is a habitual offender as he is previously

found to be involved in six other criminal cases and one semi

automatic pistol has been recovered from his possession. It is

submitted that if applicant is released on bail, there are chances of his

jumping the bail and he may indulge in similar activities.

It is reported by the Ld. defence counsel that the

applicant/accused has already been acquitted in three cases and he

is already on bail in remaining three cases. Perusal of the record

reveals that after 2018, the applicant/accused is not reported to be

involved in any other criminal case. Considering the period of

incarceration, the factum of recovery of the case property coupled with

the fact that all the material witnesses are police officials and the

applicant/accused is not likely to influence the course of trial, the

applicant/accused Pankaj is ordered to be released on bail on his

furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each

in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ld. MM/Duty MM/Link MM.



immediately.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02/NDD/PHC/ND

12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Bail Application no. 1455/2021

Directorate of Enforcement v. Rajeev Sharma ECIR/05/STF/2021 dated 26.02.2021

12.07.2021

Present: Mohd. Faraz, Ld. SPP for ED through VC.

Sh. Vinay Kumar AD, PMLA through VC.

Sh. Amish Aggarwala and Sh. Karan Ahuja, Ld. counsel

for applicant/accused Rajeev Sharma through VC.




applicant/accused Rajeev Sharma for grant of bail.

Ld. defence counsel seeks an adjournment to address

arguments in the instant application as ED remand of accused has

been extended by this court till 14.07.2021.

As prayed, list the bail application for arguments on

14.07.2021.

(Dharmender Rana) ASJ-02/NDD/PHC/ND

12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


FIR No. 194/2019 PS Sagarpur State Vs. Cancellation 12.07.2021


None has joined the proceedings via video conferencing

on behalf of the accused/complainant.


Issue court notice to the complainant for NDOH.

In terms of circulars No.2/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated

19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,

No.6/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 14/05/2021 and No. 372/RG/DHC/2021

dated 28/06/2021 of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the instant matter

is adjourned for 04.10.2021 for purpose already fixed.


immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


FIR No. 88/2019 State Vs. Sharvan @ Suraj @ Andhera & Ors. 12.07.2021



on behalf of the accused.


Issue production warrants against accused, who is/ are in

J/C, if any, for the next date of hearing.


19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


FIR No. 305/2019 State Vs. Amardeep & Ors. 12.07.2021



on behalf of the accused.





19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


FIR No. 616/2007 PS Vasant Kunj (North) State Vs. Mahender @ Babu 12.07.2021


Accused Vipin present in the court today.


on behalf of the other accused persons.





19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Case No. 222/2019 Anuvesh Chaudhary Vs. Surender & Ors. 12.07.2021

Present: None has joined the proceedings via video conferencing

on behalf of both the parties.




19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Case No. 223/2019 Sudesh Mogha Vs. Surender & Ors. 12.07.2021






19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


Case No. 68/2020 Shivani Goel Vs. Master Capital Services Ltd. 12.07.2021






19/04/2021, No.5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23/04/2021,





immediately.


12.07.2021

DHARMENDER RANA


NCB Vs. Sabir Ali & Ors.Case No. VIII/31/DZU/2020U/s 21/29 NDPS Act

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Mukesh Malik, SPP for NCB through VC.

List this matter for 22.07.2021.

Copy of order be uploaded on the website.

(Ajay Kumar Jain) Spl. Judge, NDPS/N. Delhi

12.07.2021

FIR No. 90/16PS Crime BranchState Vs. Anil Sharma @ Pandit

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Shukhveer Singh, SO, ICICI Bank.

Today in compliance of order dated 10.06.2021, the abovesaid

bank official is present and has brought DD No. 517576 amounting Rs.

50,000/ drawn on ICICI Bank. Same be sent to cash branch. Same be

deposited and receipt be issued.

Original FDR no. 18163141 in the name of Ms. Neelam

Sharma be handed over to the bank official present against proper

acknowledgment.

Copy of the order be given dasti to bank official present in the

court.


12.07.2021

FIR No. 58/13PS Special CellState Vs. A. Venugopal Reddy & Ors.

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Ravinder Khandelwal, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through

VC.

Sh. N.K. Matta, Ld. SPP for ED through VC.

At request of Ld. SPP for ED, list this application for

25.10.2021.



12.07.2021

FIR No. 64/18PS Special CellState Vs. Ashish Sharma & Ors.

12.07.2021


VC.

IO Inspector Anuj Kumar.

Today in compliance of order dated 05.07.2021, IO Inspector

Anuj has appeared and has brought DD No. 736156 amounting Rs. 25,000/

drawn on Canara Bank, DD No.004993 amounting Rs. 25,000/ drawn on

Axis Bank and DD No. 004993 amounting Rs. 25,000/ drawn on Axis Bank

(surety amount). Same be sent to cash branch. Same be deposited and

receipt be issued.

Original FDR no. 919040044526282 and 919040044525444

(Axis Bank, Faridabad Branch, Haryana) in the name of Sonu Saini and FDR

no. 117278 (Canara Bank, Rajlugarhi) in the name of Ms. Anita have

already been handed over to IO.

Copy of the order be given dasti to IO.


12.07.2021

NCB Vs. Rajesh Sharma & ors.Case No. SC/109/2020

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. P.C. Aggarwal, SPP for NCB through VC.

None for applicant/accused Naveen Kapoor.

Reply filed and supplied to Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused

through email.

Ld. SPP submitted that this is second regular bail application

and there are no new grounds made out in this application however as none

appeared on behalf of applicant/accused, one more opportunity given.

List this application for 27.07.2021.



12.07.2021

NCB Vs. Santosh SinghCase No. SC/9272/16

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Mukesh Malik, SPP for NCB through VC.

None for applicant/accused.

Reply filed.

Despite waiting till 12 Noon, none appeared on behalf of

applicant/accused.

One more opportunity given. List this application for

26.07.2021.



12.07.2021

NCB Vs. Gaurav Kumar Aggarwal & Ors.Case No. SC/133/2020

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda, SPP for NCB through VC.

None for applicant/accused Mohit Kumar Aggarwal.

This is an application filed by the applicant for defreezing of

his bank account.

Ld. SPP submits that the financial investigation over the bank

account of applicant/accused is going on therefore this court has no

jurisdiction.

None appeared on behalf of applicant/accused on the last date

of hearing. None has appeared on behalf of applicant/accused today as well.

It appears that the applicant/accused is not interested in pursuing this

application hence present application for defreezing is dismissed in default

and disposed of accordingly.



12.07.2021

NCB Vs. Chinedu PatrickCase No. SC/416/19

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. Rajesh Manchanda, SPP for NCB through VC.

Sh. Adarsh Priyadarshi, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused

through VC.

At request of Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, list this

application for 17.07.2021.



12.07.2021

FIR No. 50/2020PS Special CellState Vs. Puneet Arora & ors.

12.07.2021


VC.

Accused Puneet Arora on interim bail through VC.

Accused submitted that his counsel is not well hence requested

short adjournment.

Hence list this application for reply/arguments on 19.07.2021.



12.07.2021

FIR No. 199/2020PS Special CellState Vs. Santosh Kumar Sinha

12.07.2021


VC.

Sh. S.S. Das, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Santosh Kumar

Sinha through VC.

Ld. Counsel filed some medical documents regarding the

surgery of the minor son of the applicant/accused.

Ld. Addl. PP submits that these documents are from Ranchi

therefore requires some time for verification.

Accordingly, list this application for filing of verification report

on these documents and arguments on this application on 22.07.2021.



12.07.2021

CBN Vs. Surender KumarCase No. SC/138/2020

12.07.2021

Present: Sh. S.S. Das, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Surender

Kumar through VC.

This is an application seeking direction to jail superintendent

to summon medical documents of applicant/accused or to direct the jail

superintendent to provide the medical documents to applicant/accused.

It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the accused that the medical

condition of the accused is not well.

Accordingly, let a report be called from the jail superintendent

regarding the medical status of accused Surender Kumar for 22.07.2021.



12.07.2021

FIR No. 63/15PS Special CellState Vs. Harjinder Singh @ Rindi & ors.

12.07.2021


VC.

Sh. Anup Gupta, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Ugo

Geoffery Franklin through VC.

It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the accused that the medical

condition of the accused is not well.

Accordingly, let a report be called from the jail superintendent

regarding the medical status of accused Ugo Geoffery Franklin for

22.07.2021.



12.07.2021

Bail Matter No. 1284/21 FIR No. Not Known

PS Vasant Kunj State Vs. Devender

U/s Not Known IPC 12.07.2021 Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide order No. 6/R/RG/DHC/2021

dated 14.05.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC. None for the applicant/accused.

None is appearing for the applicant/accused even today.

Put up after 23.07.2021 when the position regarding the

physical hearing becomes clear.

List this matter on 26.07.2021.

At this stage, Sh. Vijay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the

applicant has appeared and wishes to withdraw the present

application.

Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as

withdrawn. Application disposed off.

Order dasti.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi Roster Judge 12.07.2021

Bail Matter No. 1384/21 FIR No. 447/20

PS Vasant Vihar State Vs. Amit @ Mithwa

U/s 307/120B/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act

12.07.2021 Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the


dated 14.05.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC.

Sh. Dilip Gupta, counsel for the applicant/accused through VC.

One of the co-accused with the role similar to the present

accused had already been granted interim bail for a period of 2

months.

Accordingly, the present applicant/accused is also

admitted to interim bail for a period of 45 days on furnishing of bail

bonds/surety bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of like

amount to the satisfaction of concerned Ld. MM/Duty MM subject to

the condition that he will not approach or try to influence the

complainant or any other witness.

Bail application is disposed off with liberty to the counsel

to move fresh application after the expiry of period of interim bail.

Order dasti.


Bail Matter No. 1063/21 FIR No. 12/21 PS V K South

State Vs. Arvind Kumar U/s 419/420/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC

& 66 D IT Act 12.07.2021

Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the


dated 14.05.2021.


Sh. Sankar Mishra, counsel for the applicant/accused through VC.

IO Inspector Rakesh Kumar through VC.

It is stated that in another FIR with similar content, bail

application is pending in Gujarat for 11.08.2021.

Accordingly, list this matter on 12.08.2021.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi Roster Judge

12.07.2021


PS V K South State Vs. Rahim Sheikh

U/s 457/380/411/34 IPC 12.07.2021 Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the


dated 14.05.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC. Sh. Mukesh Kumar, counsel for the applicant/accused through VC.

It is stated that the witness who was supposed to identify

the accused in TIP is not traceable and there is no likelihood of

conducting TIP of the accused in the near future. There is no recovery

from the accused.

Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that even

otherwise, only 3 persons were mentioned initially and the present

accused has been added only on the disclosure statement of the co-

accused person.

Considering over all facts and circumstances, the present

applicant is admitted to interim bail for a period of 2 months on

furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with

one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of concerned Ld.

MM/Duty MM subject to the condition that accused shall join the

further investigation or inquiry, if any, if notified by the IO and shall

continue to co-operate in the investigation.

Bail application is disposed off with liberty to the counsel

to move fresh application after the expiry of period of interim bail.

Order dasti.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi Roster Judge

12.07.2021

Bail Matter No. 1446/21, 1447/21 & 1448/21 FIR No. 155/19

PS V K North State Vs. Teenu Wadhwani, Shrey Jaiswal & Ankit Prakash

U/s 420/34 IPC 12.07.2021 Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the


dated 14.05.2021.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Ld. Addl. PP for the State through VC. Sh. Surjeet Kumar, counsel for the applicants/accused through VC. Sh. Kaushikesh Kumar, counsel with complainant through VC.

IO Inspector Rajesh Dahiya through VC.

Investigation is at preliminary stage. Several documents

have been furnished by the accused, which in view of IO, might not be

genuine.

I think investigation, on this aspect must be carried out

immediately and report be filed. In case, it is found that any of the

documents submitted by the applicant/accused alongwith bail

application are not genuine, necessary consequences shall follow and

IO shall be at liberty to invoke further provisions of the IPC in this

regard.

Considering the complexity of the matter, in my view, the

interrogation of the complainant as well as accused persons is required

to be conducted by the IO and probably they may need to be

confronted and this may take some time, in these circumstances, list

this bail application on 05.08.2021.

Accused is directed to join the investigation.

IO is also directed to provide the complete grounds on

which arrest/custody of the accused persons is required.



PS V K North

State Vs. Sagar Raikwar U/s 420 IPC

12.07.2021 Matter taken up through VC pursuant to directions issued by the

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide order No. 6/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated

14.05.2021.


Sh. Alok Sinha, counsel for the applicant/accused through VC.

Although, it has been claimed that accused was only

providing his account for receipt of payment by the main conspirator , on

commission basis, it has been noticed that the money was not being

withdrawn in cash but immediately the accused was transferring the money

online to the account of the other co-accused.

Therefore, this is not a case where the present accused had

fallen into the trap of the main conspirator and only provided account for

receiving payment. This seems to be a case where the accused is working as

on front, since there might have been an intention to create an illusion of

conversation with party and receipt of payment by another person to

prevent detection/make the investigation of the crime more difficult.

In these circumstances, the role of the accused seems to be of

co-conspirator and not of a victim.

Therefore, bail application is dismissed.

Order dasti.

Harjyot Singh Bhalla

ADJ/ASJ/PO MACT/PHC/New Delhi

Roster Judge 12.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SHRI ANIL ANTIL; ASJ 04, PHC, NEW DELHI

Bail Application No. 1423/21Saurav Gupta Vs. CGST12.07.2021

This is the second application filed under Section 438 Cr.

PC on behalf of the applicant/accused Saurav Gupta for grant of

anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest for the offences punishable

under Section 132 (1) (b) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Matter taken up through Video Conferencing from the

Residence.

Present: Sh. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate for the Applicant

(through V/C).

Sh. Harpreet Singh, learned SPP for the

Department/CGST (through V/C).

Reply filed on behalf of the department be taken on

record.

At the request of learned Senior Advocate, taking note of

his personal difficulty, the matter is adjourned for today.

Renotify for arguments/consideration on 14.07.2021.

Copy of the order be given through emode to all the

parties concerned.

The order be also uploaded on the official website of the

court.

In addition, dasti be also given as prayed.

(Anil Antil) ASJ04/NDD/PHC/ND

12.07.2021


Bail Application No. 1458/21State Vs. Tirlangi Shankar Rao & Ors. FIR No. 244/20PS: Tilak MargU/s. 379 IPC12.07.2021

This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr. PC on

behalf of the applicant namely Tirlangi Shankar Rao for grant of

anticipatory bail.


Residence.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Additional PP for the State (through V/C).

IO ASI Sunil Kumar is also present (through V/C).

Sh. Abhinav Garg, Advocate for the applicant/accused

(through V/C).

In terms of the status report filed by the IO,

applicant/accused has already been arrested in the present case on

29.06.2021, pursuant to the permission granted by the learned MM

and as of now, he is in J/C.

To this, the learned defence counsel submits that he is

not pressing the present application as the same has become

infructuous as he was not aware of the fact that the applicant is in

J/C and therefore seeks permission to withdraw the same with

liberty to seek his relief before the appropriate forum.

In view of the aforesaid request so made, the application

accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn being infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.


parties concerned.


court.



12.07.2021


Bail Application No. 633/21DGGI Vs. Ritesh Aggarwal12.07.2021

This is a petition filed under Section 439 (2) Cr. PC on

behalf of the petitioner, seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to

the respondent vide order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the court of

learned CMM, PHC, New Delhi.


Residence.

Present: Sh. Harpreet Singh, learned SPP for the

petitioner/department (through V/C).

Dr. G.K. Sarkar, Advocate for the non

applicant/respondent (through V/C).

Arguments heard.

Be put up for clarification/further consideration on

15.07.2021.

In the meantime, liberty is granted to the department to

file relevant details/incriminating material, if any, surfaced against the

accused to connect him with the alleged eight dummy firms, in a

sealed cover by Wednesday i.e. 14.07.2021 by 4.00 pm.


parties concerned.


court. In addition, dasti be also given as prayed.


12.07.2021


State Vs. Ismile @ Bengali FIR No. 242/16PS: Connaught PlaceU/s. 302/308/34 IPC12.07.2021


Residence.


Sh. Sushant Mehra, LAC for the applicant/accused

(through V/C).

At the request of learned LAC, the matter be put up for

consideration tomorrow i.e. 13.07.2021.


parties concerned.


court.



12.07.2021


Bail Application No. 8511/16 State Vs. Mohit FIR No. 102/14PS:Sagar Pur 12.07.2021


Residence.


Sh. Deepak Nagar, Advocate for the complainant

(through V/C).

Sh. Rajeev Mohan, Advocate for the applicant/accused

(through V/C).

During proceedings, the learned counsel for the

complainant submitted that the bail application filed is scheduled to

be taken up on 05.08.2021 in terms of the previous orders.

In view of the joint request so made, the bail application

be put up on 05.08.2021.

However, the main matter is adjourned for PE on

25.10.2021.

Witnesses, in terms of previous orders, be summoned for

the next date of hearing.


parties concerned.


court.



12.07.2021


State Vs. Mushtaq Ahmad & Ors. FIR No. 583/2020PS: Naraina U/s. 302/201/34 IPC12.07.2021


Residence.


Sh. Shivam, Advocate for the applicant (through V/C).

By virtue of filing the present application, the applicant

Smt. Sayma, wife of Ishtihaq @ Ishtihar for release of mobile phone

make Vivo V19 on superdari.

In view of the status report filed by the IO that the said

mobile phone is not the case property; not the part of the

investigation nor any evidence is to be adduced qua the said mobile

phone and the fact that he has no objection in case the said mobile

phone be released to the applicant on superdari after due

verification, the application accordingly stands disposed of as

allowed.

Let, the mobile phone make Vivo19 of silver grey colour

be released to the applicant on superdari after due verification and

necessary compliance.

Ordered accordingly.


parties concerned.


court.



12.07.2021


SC No. 114/21 State Vs. Adesh & Ors. FIR No. 139/17PS: Vasant Kunj North 12.07.2021


Residence.

Present: None.

In continuation of the orders of the Hon'ble High Court vide

Orders No. 256/RG/DHC/2021 dated 08.04.2021, No. 2/R/RG/DHC/2021

dated 19.04.2021, No. 5/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 23.04.2021, No.

6/R/RG/DHC/2021 dated 14.05.2021 and 372/RG/DHC dated 28.06.2021,

all the “urgent matters” and “final arguments cases” shall be taken up

through Video Conferencing till 23.07.2021.

In view thereof, be put up on 25.10.2021 for the purpose

already fixed.

Copy of the order be given through emode to all the parties

concerned.



12.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SHRI ANIL ANTIL; ASJ 04, PHC, NEW DELHI SC No. 22/18State Vs. Mashiar Rahman Mondal & Anr. FIR No. 57/17PS: Special Cell12.07.2021


Residence.


None for the accused persons.

In view of the directions issued by the Hon'ble High Court

vide notification dated 28.06.2021, the matter is adjourned for today.

Be put up for PE on 25.10.2021.

Witnesses, as per previous orders be summoned for the

next date in case the physical hearing of the courts is resumed.


12.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SHRI ANIL ANTIL; ASJ 04, PHC, NEW DELHI SC No. 324/18 State Vs. Geeta FIR No. 143/18PS: Inder Puri 12.07.2021


Residence.


None for the accused persons.

In view of the directions issued by the Hon'ble High Court

vide notification dated 28.06.2021, the matter is adjourned for today.

Be put up for PE on 25.10.2021.

Witnesses, as per previous orders be summoned for the

next date in case the physical hearing of the courts is resumed.


12.07.2021


CA No. 81/17Kavit Kumar &Ors. Vs. State12.07.2021


Residence.

Present: None for the Appellant.

Sh. Kundan Kohli, SPP for the State (through V/C).

Since none is appearing on behalf of the appellant

despite repeated calls, let E notice be issued to the appellant as well

as to his counsel to appear, preferably through V/C and assist the

court on the next date of hearing.

At request, be put up for arguments/consideration on

22.10.2021.


concerned.



12.07.2021


CR No. 252/19Manjit Singh Vs. State & Ors. CC No. 30869/16PS: R.K. Puram 12.07.2021


Residence.

Present: None for the Revisionist.

Sh. S.K. Kain, Additional PP for the State/Respondent

(through V/C).

Since none is appearing on behalf of the revisionist despite

repeated calls, let E notice be issued to the revisionist as well as to his

counsel to appear, preferably through V/C and assist the court on the next

date of hearing.

Be put up for arguments/consideration on 25.10.2021.


concerned.



12.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SHRI ANIL ANTIL; ASJ 04, PHC, NEW DELHICR No. 171/120Ashok Kumar Madan Vs. State FIR No. 1117/14PS: Vasant Kunj South 12.07.2021


Residence.

Present: Sh. Fahim Khan, Advocate for the revisionist (through

V/C).

Sh. S.K. Kain, Additional PP for the State/Respondent

(through V/C).

At request, the matter is adjourned for today.

Renotify for arguments/consideration on 28.08.2021.

In the meantime, if physical hearing of the courts is not

resumed, the learned counsel is requested to send the Ecopy of the

entire petition/paper book to the prosecution as well as to the court two

days prior to the next date of hearing.


concerned.



12.07.2021


CR No. 355/20State Vs. Ajay Prakash CC No. 504/17PS: Vasant Vihar 12.07.2021


Residence.

Present: Sh. S.K. Kain, Additional PP for the State/Revisionist

(through V/C).

Respondent with Sh. Braham Singh, Advocate.

None is present on behalf of the complainant despite calls.

Let, E notice be be issued to the complainant as well as to his

counsel to appear, preferably through V/C and assist the court on the next

date of hearing.

Be put up for orders/clarification, if any, on 16.07.2021.


concerned.



12.07.2021

Bail Application No.836/2021 Parveen Kumar Soneja & Ors. Vs. State

FIR No.73/21PS : Naraina

U/s: 354/354A/354B/328/498A406/506/509/34 IPC12.07.2021

Vide order No.9871-9900/Bail & Filing/Judl./Prin.D&SJ/NDD/2021 dated30.04.2021, the undersigned has been deputed for duty today to hear and dispose of freshbail/urgent criminal applications and pending bail applications pertaining to New DelhiDistrict Sessions Division through video-conferencing mode in accordance with law.

This application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, moved on behalfof the applicants namely Parveen Kumar Soneja, Kiran Soneja and Karan Soneja, is pending.

Present: Smt. Kamlesh Mahajan, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused (through VC).Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for State (through VC).Sh. K.K. Manan, Ld. Senior Advocate with Sh. Devinder Singh Khatana, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC).Complainant (through VC).SI Shrikrishna on behalf IO/SHO concerned (through VC).

SI Shrikrishna has sent e-written request seeking more time to to file further status

report on the ground that the IO has gone to Amritsar for investigation of this case.

Heard. Perused.

On the last date of hearing i.e. 04.06.2021 on the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the

complainant that substantial jewellery articles worth more than Rs.3 crore and the articles given by

the applicants’ side to the complainant, have not been returned and that no locker of the applicants

has been searched. IO was directed to further thoroughly investigate the matter qua the disputed

questions of facts w.r.t the istridhan articles allegedly not recovered and the alleged threat received

by the complainant but in spite of passing of more than one month from the date of the said order,

no further investigation report on the said aspect has been filed by the IO.

From the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the complainant, it appears that the

complainant has strong grievances qua the conduct of the investigating agency for not investigating

the matter fairly and speedily. In view of the same and in view of the fact that the IO has not filed

the further status report in spite of passing of more than one month since the last aforesaid order, I

am of the considered opinion that the matter requires the personal indulgence of the Commissioner

of Police. Hence, copy of this order as well as copy of the previous order dated 04.06.2021 be sent

to the Commissioner of Police for ensuring that the fair and speedy investigation is carried out and

status report in terms of previous order is positively filed before the NDOH. In case the same is

filed, e-copies thereof be supplied to the Ld. Counsels for both sides.

Interim order to continue till NDOH. Dasti to all concerned.

Re-notify on 04.08.2021.

This Court is satisfied qua audio & video connectivity of the video conference

hearing.

(Ashutosh Kumar) Roster Judge/ASJ-01/Special Court POCSO

NDD/PHC/ND/12.07.2021/D

Bail Application No.837/2021 Varun Soneja Vs. State

FIR No.73/21PS : Naraina

U/s: 354/354A/354B/328/498A406/506/509/34 IPC12.07.2021

Vide order No.9871-9900/Bail & Filing/Judl./Prin.D&SJ/NDD/2021 dated30.04.2021, the undersigned has been deputed for duty today to hear and dispose of freshbail/urgent criminal applications and pending bail applications pertaining to New DelhiDistrict Sessions Division through video-conferencing mode in accordance with law.

This application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, moved on behalfof the applicant Varun Soneja, is pending.

Present: Smt. Kamlesh Mahajan, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused (through VC).Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for State (through VC).Sh. K.K. Manan, Ld. Senior Advocate with Sh. Devinder Singh Khatana, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC).Complainant (through VC).SI Shrikrishna on behalf IO/SHO concerned (through VC).

SI Shrikrishna has sent e-written request seeking more time to to file further status

report on the ground that the IO has gone to Amritsar for investigation of this case.

Heard. Perused.

On the last date of hearing i.e. 04.06.2021 on the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the

complainant that substantial jewellery articles worth more than Rs.3 crore and the articles given by

the applicant’s side to the complainant, have not been returned and that no locker of the applicant

has been searched. IO was directed to further thoroughly investigate the matter qua the disputed

questions of facts w.r.t the istridhan articles allegedly not recovered and the alleged threat received

by the complainant but in spite of passing of more than one month from the date of the said order,

no further investigation report on the said aspect has been filed by the IO.

From the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the complainant, it appears that the

complainant has strong grievances qua the conduct of the investigating agency for not investigating

the matter fairly and speedily. In view of the same and in view of the fact that the IO has not filed

the further status report in spite of passing of more than one month since the last aforesaid order, I

am of the considered opinion that the matter requires the personal indulgence of the Commissioner

of Police. Hence, copy of this order as well as copy of the previous order dated 04.06.2021 be sent

to the Commissioner of Police for ensuring that the fair & speedy investigation is carried out and

status report in terms of previous order is positively filed before the NDOH. In case the same is

filed, e-copies thereof be supplied to the Ld. Counsels for both sides.

Interim order to continue till NDOH. Dasti to all concerned.

Re-notify on 04.08.2021.


hearing.


NDD/PHC/ND/12.07.2021/D

Bail Application No.1460/2021Gaurav Vats Vs. State

Complaint Case No.935/2021FIR No. Not Known

PS : CAW Cell, South West District, Delhi Cantt.U/s: 498A/406 IPC

12.07.2021Vide order No.9871-9900/Bail & Filing/Judl./Prin.D&SJ/NDD/2021 dated

30.04.2021, the undersigned has been deputed for duty today to hear and dispose of freshbail/urgent criminal applications and pending bail applications pertaining to New DelhiDistrict Sessions Division through video-conferencing mode in accordance with law.

This is an application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, moved onbehalf of the applicant Gaurav Vats.

Present: Sh. Himanshu Detwal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused (through VC).Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for State (through VC).

Heard. Perused.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that initially he had filed a

similar application before the Dwarka Court and was informed that the jurisdiction of the present

matter lies in this Court but later on it was got clarified from the said court that the jurisdiction of

this matter pertaining to CAW Cell, South West District, lies with the Dwarka Court only. He has

accordingly requested that the present application may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to

pursue the other application filed before the Dwarka Court. Ordered accordingly.

Application stands disposed of. Dasti to all concerned.


hearing.


NDD/PHC/ND/12.07.2021/D

DHARMENDE R RANA - District Courts

Documents

Transcript of DHARMENDE R RANA - District Courts