Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona - Patriots for Truth

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 chris@privateamericancitizen. org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK,

-against-Plaintiff,

STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, ANDREA STEWART-COUSINS, CARL E. HEASTIE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WARREN ·'BILL DE BLASIO' WILHELM JR., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE TOM PEREZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC .. and VOICE FOR CHOICE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY ACTION FUND, INC.

Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH

PLAINTIFF'S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO

THE FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

This is Petitioners Declaration with Exhibits 51 through 88 due for filing by 28 May 2019, as a

continuation of the 50 exhibits submitted to date, and this is Undersigned's response accompanying

his MOL in opposition to the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss added for the convenience of the

Court (see Exhibit 51), and that Undersigned's declaration continues in support of injunctive relief

against Defendants use of the so-called Rehabilitative Health Act (RHA) by New York Defendants'

etal, that asks for a finding against the Governor trustee for breach of his fiduciary duty to protect

government collateral property under the continuing Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933 under the

continuing 86 year FOR Proclamation 2040, whose Emergency Government system occupation of all

states as territory during the emergency seized all property as booty dedicated as public property

collateral for repayment of the debt; and that along with all Defendants and those yet named the

1

Federal Defendants are aiding and abetting illegal alien residence for unjust enrichment in violation of

8 USC §1324, with 13 USC Sec. 141/Sec. 195, P.L. 94-171, 18 USC §611 (illegals voting in

elections) and 2 USC §2a, 2 USC §6, 18 USC §1091 and related law as apply to Governor Cuomo's

breach of fiduciary duty under the 1933 Emergency Banking Relief Act and Proclamation 2040

continuing thirty-one (31) emergency orders of the Commander-in-Chief. That Undersigned contends

that the Senior Executive Service (SES) and the Queens Privy Council/ Five Eyes protected

SERCO, INC controlling our Military Industrial Complex is described in the previous Declarations'

Exhibits 17, 32 and 44 thru 48; and as for the Federal Defendant's Counsel only partially references

some previous case , Undersigned has been involved with many Election related cases even going

back to the Carter- Ford challenges in 1976; wherein as an Architectural student with work

experience, I testified as a expert witness on vote fraud from abandoned buildings in Bronx County in

a hearing held in EDNY before Judge Jacob Mishler - who therein held that the mathematical model

proved fraud; however, that if plaintiffs cannot bring everyone who was defrauded before the court the

election stands -sure the best of English luck. Exhibits attached herewith are as follows:

1. That Exhibit 52 is a biography of then Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Kirstjen M. Nielson published by Wikipedia that shows Secretary Nielson is an attorney who

served as special assistant to POTUS 43 George W Bush, a position that entitling her to

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE Membership by way of the White House Homeland Security

Council, thereby affording her close coordination with then Director of the FBI Robert Mueller

and in close coordination with the Five/Eyes intelligence community.

2. That Exhibit 53 is the newest first current chronological set of Press Releases issued by

Secretary Nielson as listed on the DHS website https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/press

releases from 15 February 2018, from which Undersigned emphasizes several as follows:

3. That Exhibit 54 is the 10 April2019 Farewell Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen upon

leaving DHS;

2

4. That Exhibit 55 is the 10 April2019 Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the

Resignation of ICE Acting Director Ronald D. Vitiello;

5. That Exhibit 56 is the 7 April 2019 resignation message from Secretary of Homeland Security

Kirstjen M. Nielsen;

6. That Exhibit 57 is the 1 April 2019 announcement for meetings through 5 Aprils by Secretary

Kirstjen M. Nielsen in Europe for Bilateral Security Meetings, Representing U.S. at Gathering of

G7 Interior Ministers to advance transatlantic collaboration against an array of security threats,

and while in London to confer with top UK counterterrorism and cybersecurity officials;

7. That Exhibit 58 is the 26 March 2019 announcement of meetings by Secretary Nielsen with

Mexican Officials on Border Emergency, Travels to Honduras to Meet with Northern Triangle

Governments to Address Crisis at Source;

8. That Exhibit 59 is the 5 February 2019 announcement by Acting Attorney General Matthew G.

Whitaker and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen who submitted a joint report

to President Donald J. Trump on February 4, 2019 evaluating the impact of any foreign

interference on election infrastructure or the infrastructure of political organizations, including

campaigns and candidates in the 2018-midterm elections and while the report remains

classified, supposedly its findings will help drive future efforts to protect election and

political/campaign infrastructure from foreign interference;

9. That Exhibit 60 is the 5 November 2018 joint announcement on Election Day Preparations by

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, DNI Dan Coats, and FBI

Director Christopher Wray released in coordination with federal, state, local, and private sector

partners nationwide efforts purportedly to protect our elections, and therein with no mention of

the necessity for a paper trail be available for proof against fraud.

10. That Exhibit 61 is the 3 October 2018 announcement by Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen of

National Cybersecurity Awareness Month inter alia states that in regards to the 2018 Elections:

3

"We currently have no indication that a foreign adversary intends to disrupt our election infrastructure. But I will immediately follow that with, this is a point in time. We know they have the capability and we know they have the will. So we're constantly on alert. What we see with China right now are influence campaigns, the more traditional, long-standing, holistic influence campaigns."

11 . That Exhibit 62 is the 5 November 2018 correspondence transmittal from the SUPREME

COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CLERK returning the In Re Strunk el al.

Application to The Chief Justice No: 16A 1190 for Extraordinary WRIT OF MANDAMUS

APPLICATION taken from the 29 October 2018 denial of hearing taken from the U.S. Court of

Appeals for the Armed Forces requesting Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief inter alia

preserving the 6 November 2018 Mid-Term Election Paper Ballots and convening a Court of

Inquiry pursuant to the letter and intent of the National Emergency Mandates issued by the

Commander-in-Chief, Donald John Trump, herein with only a partial appendix Pages APX-001

through APX-126; and having promulgated by the expectation of huge vote fraud and

mismanagement as follows:

12. That Exhibit 63 is the New York Times propaganda Article titled "Trumps Misleads on Russian

Meddling Why 17 Intelligence Agencies Don't Need to Agree" by Mathew Rosenberg published

on 6 July 2017 without mention of the HAMR spying program maintain the narrative that the

Russians interfered with the 2016 Election.

13. That Exhibit 64 is the 13 September 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on President Trump's

Election Security Executive Order shown at Exhibit 62 APX-001 thru APX 008 .. .

14. That Exhibit 65 is the 24 August 2018 announcement that DHS, FBI held a Joint Briefing for

Election Officials with fraudster Facebook and Microsoft;

15. That Exhibit 66 is the 15 February 2018 announcement that on February 16 and February 18,

the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), together with the Department of

Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), will sponsor a

classified briefing for election officials from all 50 states. This national-level classified dialogue

4

with officials from the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), the National

Association of State Election Directors (NASED), and the Election Assistance Commission but

no discussion of a paper trail enforcement;

16. That Exhibit 67 is a set of three press reports about the Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery who

from 2001 thru 2014 conducted unconstitutional 4th amendment violation by the U.S.

Intelligence community by illegal electronic spying used for coercion against government

officials and individuals:

17. The WorldNet Daily (WND) exclusive published 30 April2015 titled "2 Members of Supreme

Court Targeted BY U.S. Spies" with a claim that U.S. intelligence agencies have "harvested" the

personal and private data of "hundreds of federal officials and judges, including Chief Justice

John Roberts and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg," charges a legal brief filed by Larry Klayman,

the attorney who has come to be known as "the HAMR";

18. The postemail.com on 20 December 2015 report by Sharon Rondeau titled "IT WAS ALWAYS

GOING TO THE FBI" detailed fraud by the Intelligence agencies; and

19. The 19 March 22017 News max published editorial written by Attorney Larry Klayman

title "Nunes Must Ask FBI's Corney About Montgomery Mass Surveillance Case" Sunday,

March 19, 2017 concerning the president's claims that he was wiretapped, that is. illegally spied

upon, by his predecessor's administration, former President Barack Obama. and that his client

whistleblower Dennis Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600

million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as

a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence

committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal

surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other

justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly.

Working side by side with Obama's former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James

Clapper, and Obama's former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed "up

5

close and personal" this "Orwellian Big Brother" intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion,

blackmail or other nefarious purposes.

20. That because on 2 November 2018 DHS decided to single me out for my efforts to file for

protection against election fraud as shown in part at Exhibit 62, and that Undersigned being the

Trustee of the Crypto Currency Resolution Trust (CCRT) in the matter of cases filed in the

British Indian Ocean Territory that in all likelihood would require my testimony in London in an

abundance of caution, with agreement of counsel, decided to find out what threat matrix DHS

had included me in as a result of its decision that my efforts to prevent vote fraud somehow

threatened DHS and the SES and SERCO INC and others including the Queen's Privy Council

who are benefiting in their corrupting the U.S. election system, and

21 . That based upon my knowledge of the 2013 elimination of the Smith Mundt Act prohibition

against using propaganda against the American people Undersigned decided to file eighteen

(18) FOIPA requests for the supposed seventeen (17) intelligence agencies to find out.

22. That on 27 November 2018 Undersigned served by certified mail of eighteen (18) FOIPA

requests of the supposed U.S. Intelligence Agencies not including the Secret Service per se see

(Exhibit 68); and

23. Then on 30 November 2018 Undersigned served an amendment to the request by certified mail

of eighteen (18) FOIPA requests of the supposed U.S. Intelligence Agencies not including the

Secret Service per se see (Exhibit 69);

24. So far Undersigned received return receipts for the FOIPA service in part at Exhibit 70; and

25. That on 11 December 2018 the United States Department of the Air Force responded to the

FOIPA see Exhibit 71; and

26. That on 18 December 2018 the Department of the Navy Office of Naval Intelligence responded

to the FOIPA see Exhibit 73; and

27. That on 12 December 2018 the Department of the Army United States Army Intelligence and

Security Command responded to the FOIPA see Exhibit 74;

6

28. That on 12 March 2019 the United States National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency responded to

the FOIPA see Exhibit 75;

29. That on 19 December 2018 the United States Department of the Treasury responded to the

FOIPA see Exhibit 76;

30. That the United States Department of Energy has not responded to the FOIPA see Exhibit 77;

31. That on 18 December 2018 the Drug Enforcement Administration responded to the FOIPA see

Exhibit 78;

32. That the United States State Department has not responded to the FOIPA see Exhibit 79;

33. That on 20 December 2018 the United States National Security Agency responded to the


34. That on 14 December 2018 the United States Department of Homeland Security responded to

the FOIPA in a totally objectionable evasive form over substance fashion see Exhibit 81,

therein stated:

"Whenever possible, a request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipients, and subject matter of the records, if known, or the DHS component or office you believe created and/or controls the record. The FOIA does not require an agency to create new records, answer questions posed by requesters, or attempt to interpret a request that does not identify specific records .. . "

35. That on 20 December 2018 United States Defense Intelligence Agency responded to the


36. That on 1 February 2019 Central Intelligence Agency responded to the FOIPA see Exhibit 83;

37. That to date the United States Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research has not

responded to the FOIPA see Exhibit 84;

38. That to date the United States National Reconnaissance Office has not responded to the FOIPA

see Exhibit 85;

39. That to date the United States Director of National Intelligence has not responded to the FOIPA

see Exhibit 86;

7

40. That to date the United States Marine Corps Marine Corps Intelligence has not responded to the


41 . That on 14 December 2018 the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation responded to the


Undersigned states, declares and verifies that the above Exhibits 51 thru 88 are in support of

opposition to the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss are true and correct to the best of my

knowledge and belief, and that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the

matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe

it to be true, and the grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and

belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge under penalty of

perjury with 28 USC §1746.

Dated: May 27 2019 Lake Luzerne, New York

Chr1s opher Earl Strunk, in esse Sui juris Plaintiff in propria persona Post Office Box 70

Corinth, New York 12822 All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

8

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-202 DNH/CFH STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, ANDREA STEWART-COUSINS, CARL E. HEASTIE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WARREN ·'BILL DE BLASIO' WILHELM JR., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE TOM PEREZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC.. and VOICE FOR CHOICE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY ACTION FUND, INC. Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLAINTIFF'S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

EXHIBIT 51


CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Plaintiff, v.

STATE OF NEW YORK, et al.~

Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. ) 1: 19-cv-202 (DNH/CFH) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF MOTION

MOTIONDY:

DATE, TIME AND PLACE:

SUPPORTING PAPERS:

RELIEF SOUGHT:

PAPERS IN OPPOSJTION:

REPLY PAPERS:

United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Unjted States Department of Homeland Security

Jtme 14,2019 at 10:00 a.m. U.S. Courthouse Utica, New York

Memorandum of Law and Exhibits submjtted herewith

Dismissal PW'suant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)

To be mcu ami served pursuant to L.R. 7.1 on or before May 28,2019

To be flled and served pursuant to L.R. 7.1 on or before Jtme 3, 2019

Dated: May 10,2019 GRANT C. JAQUJTH United States Attorney Northern District ofNew York

By: Is/John D. Hoggan, Jr.

2

JOHN D. HOGGAN, JR. Assistant United States Attorney Bar Roll No. 511254 James T. Foley U.S. Cow1house 445 Broadway, Room 218 Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 431-0247 Facsimile: (518) 43 1-0249 jolm.hoggan@usdoj. gov



Plaintiff, v.

STATE OF NEW YORK, era!.,

Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil At:tiou Nu. ) l: 19-cv-202 (DNH/CFH) ) ) )

FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMlSS PETITION AND COMPLAINT

GRANT C. JAQUITH United States Attorney Northern District ofNew York

By: JOHN D. HOGGAN, JR. Assistant United States Attorney James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse 445 Broadway, Room 218 Albany, NY 12207

TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................. ...................... ................................................. ................ . !

PROCEDU.RAL IDSTORY ... ............................. ...... ..... ...... ................... ............................... ....... ... .. ........ 3

ARGUMENT .... .... .. .... ... .......... ... ...... ...... ..... ....................................... ......................................................... 3

I. Standard of Review .. ... ... ................ ...... .... ......... ... ... .... ............ .................. ... ... ..... ..... ...................... 3

A. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(l) ....................................... .... ........ ....... ............................ 3

B. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b )(6) ........................... ....... .............. ........................... ........... 4

II. All ofPJaiotifrs Causes of Action Must Be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pt·ocedure 12(b)(l) .. ........... ......... .. .............. ............. ... ............... .... ... .. ..... ........ ... ........ ........ .............. .. ..... S

A. Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Assett His Claims Against the Federal Defendants ...... ..................... S

B. Sovereign Immunity ....... ............................................................... ........... ................... ....... ... ........ 8

ID. Each of Plaintiff's Claims Must Be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure U(b)(6) for Failure to State a Cause of Action . .... ...... .......................................................................... 9

A. Substantive Due Process ..................... .. ...................................... ..... ........ .. .. ... ... .. ........... ............. . 9

B. Equal protection ........................................... ..... ......... ..... ..... .. ... ...... ............................ ......... ... .. .. 1 0

C. Equal protection conspiracy .... ... ............................................ ................... ............... .. ... .............. 11

CONCLUSION ................................................................... ... ... ............ ................... ............... ................. .. I2

ii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Akeem v. United States, 854 F. Supp. 2d 289,295 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) ..... ............ .... .. ..................... .......... 9

Angulo v. NasstnrCnty., 89 F.Supp.3d 541, 548-49 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) ........................ ................................ .4

Ashcroft v.lqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) .......................................................... ..... .. .. ......................... ..... 4

Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. DisL., 475 U.S. 534, 541-42 (1986) ..... .... .................................. ....... ....... 6

Bertin v. United States, 478 F.3d 489,491 (2d Ci.r. 2007) ....... ..................................................................... 5

.Britt v. Garcia, 457 P.3d 264, 270 n. 4 (2d Cir. 2006)) .................. ....................... .. ........ ......... ...... .. .......... !!

B1yant v. City of New York, No. 99 Civ. 11237,2003 WL 22861926, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Dec.2, 2003) ........ . 9

Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc., 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir. 2002) .............................................................. 4

DaimlerCh1}•sler v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 n.3 (2006) ....... .. ...... .. ..................... .................... ..... .... ... ... ..... 6

Dotson v. Griesa, 398 F.3d J 56, 177 (2d Cir. 2005) ...................... ............................ .. ....... .. ........................ 8

Drain v. Freeport Union Free Sch. Dist., No. J4,CV~ I 959 SJF, 2015 WL 101445 1, at* l (E.D.N.Y. Mar.

9, 2015) ..... ................... ... ... ...... ... ... .. ...... .. ....... ............... , .. ................... ..... ......................... ................ ....... 9

FD!Cv. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471,477-78 (1994) .............................................................................................. 9

Forjone v. State ofCal!fornia, eta!., No. 1:06-CVI002 (LE.K/RFT), 2010 WL 653651 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 19,

2010), affd, 425 F. App'x 73 (2d Cit. 2011) .......... ........ ... .... ...... ............ ........ ................ ..... .... ............ . 2. 7

Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009) ......... .......... .. .... ........ .............. .. .... ..... ..... ............................. 4

1-lolling:n·vorth, 133 S. Ct. at 2661 ............... ............................................................................................ ...... 5

LaTrieste Rest. & Cabaret f11c. v. Village qf Pol'f Chester, 40 F.3d 587, 590 (2d Cir. 1994) .......... ...... ..... 1 0

Lowrance v. Achtyl, 20 F.3d 529, 537 (2d Cir.l994) ............................................................... .... .. ............... 9

Lujan v. Defenders ojWUdlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) ................................................. .................. 6, 7

Makarova v. United States. 201 FJd 110, 113 (2d Cir. 2000) ......... .... .. .......... .. .. .. ......... ......................... 3, 4

Micm v. Donaldson, LujA:-in & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 7 FJd 1085, 1087 (2d Cir. 1993) ................. , ........ .. .... 11

Posr v. Court Officer Shield No. 207, 180 F .3d 409, 419 (2d Cir. 1999) ... ................................................ 11

Ill

Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 , 819 ( 1997) ............................................... .................... ........ ..... .. .... .. .... ......... 6

Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312, 316 ( 1991) .................. ..... ............................................................. ............... 6

Robinson v. Allstate Ins. Co .. 508 Fed. App'x 7, 9 (2d Cir. 20 13) ... .................... ................................. ..... ! 1

Ross e.x~ rel. Dunham v. Lantz, 408 F.3d 121 , 123 (2d Cir. 2005) ......................... ................................ ...... } 0

Shipping Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Drakos, 140 F.3d 129. 131 (2d Cir. 1998) ....... ..... .. ............................... .... ... .4

Strunk v. NY Province of Soc. of Jesus, No. ClV.A. 09-1249 (RJL), 2010 WL 81612 1, at* 1 (D.D.C,

Mar. 8, 2010) ............. ........ ...................................................... .. .......... .... ...... .. .... ............... ......... .. ...... .. 2, 8

Sb·unk v. State of California, et al., 1 :16-cv-1496, (BKS/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. May 19, 201 7) .... .. ......... .... ... ... 7

Strunkv. United States Dep 't qfCommerce. Bureau ofthe Census, et al.: Civ. No. 09-1295 (RJL), 2010

WL 960428. *1. (D.D.C. Mar. 15, 2010) ....... .......... .... ..... ............. .. ............ ................. ..... .................. .. 2, 7

United Bhd. ojCa11Jenters v. Scott. 463 U.S. 825, 828- 29 ( 1983) ................................... .......................... I I

United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969) .. .......... ... ......... .............................................................. ............ 8

United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980) .......................................................... ....... ......... .... ....... 8

United States v. Shen11ood_, 312 U.S. 584, 586 (1941) .............................. ............. ........ ........ ....................... 8

United States v. Teston, 424 U.S. 392: 399 (1976) ..... ........... .... ... ...... ................................ .......................... 8

Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U .S. 562, 564 (2000) ....................................................................... ] 0

Warth v. Seldin. 422 U.S. 490, 500 (1975) .............................................................................. ................. 5, 7

Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 154 (1990) .............................. ......................................................... 13

Statutes

42 u.s.c. § 1985 ........ ................ ........................................ .............. .................................................. .. .. ..... 11

iv

Defendants United States Department of Health and Human Services ('"IIHS'') and tbe

United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") (collectively, the "Federal

Defendants'') respectfully submit this mernorandwu of law io supp01t of the Federal Defendants'

motion to dismiss the petition and complaint (the "Complaint") of Plaintiff Clu·istopher Earl

Strunk (''Plaint 1ft'' or ••s trunk'} Docket No. 1. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs

complaint lacks any merit as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Federal Defendants submit that

the instant matter should be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Despite his volwninous submission of rambling, incoherent and/or irrelevant material,

Strunk has alleged remarkably few actual tacts in support oflus Complaint. Accordingly, the

Federal Defendants limjt their factual recitation to the few facts which are relevant to the instant

motion.

This matter is merely the latest is a long line ofbizane, frivolous and nonsensical cases

ftled by Strunk. Complaint~ 1. Although nominally pled as a challenge to the New York

Reproductive Health Act CRHA''), Strunk claims that the State of New York has infringed his

"fundamental rights'· by:

the State of New York's Public Officers [sic] malicious admjnistration and enforcement duties under the 1933 Emergency Banking Relief Act and Proclamation 2040 continuing thirty-one (31) emergency orders of the Commander-in Chief and related law fail to protect the newborn chattel that safeguards the credit worthiness of the United States of American on which Plaintiff depends, and Defendants by conspiracy State ofNew York's Public Officers and others similarly situated jointly act with the Democratic Party National Committee [sic] use of illegal aliens and contrive dependency of persons to increase their political base by population loss to the detriment of Plaintiff(s)[.]"

Complaint at 2.

Among his nonsensical allegations, Plaintiff claims that New York is: engaged in a

"racketeering scheme" to allow for the maturatjon of fetuses "for sale of body parts and fetal I

infant fluids", Complaint ~ 13; fluoridating drinking water to "diminish(] user Intelligence

Quotient and . .. lower[] resident IQ", Complaint, 22; pemlirting ' 'use of Microwave

communications 4G 5Gv, which creates "external electromagnetic fields [that] create fatigue.

sleep problems and imbalance to the body[,]" to promote ''control over residents to create

dependency or to force opponents to leave." Complaint~ 23; and "tlood[ing] towns and cities by

releasing inmates~' of psychiatric and criminal detention facilities "to create dependency or to

force opponents to leave." Complaint~~ 31-32.

Plaintiff also alleges harm from New York's "illegal aiding and abetting in sanctuary for

the ongoing illegal alien invasion" which, he contends, along with various conspiracy theories

involving the Roman Catholic Church, the .Tesujts, the Sovereign Military Order ofMaJta,

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 and the Emergency Banking Act of

1933, see Strunkv. N. Y Province of Soc. of Jesus, No. ClV.A. 09-J 249 (RJL), 2010 WL 81612L

at* 1 (O.D.C. Mar. 8, 2010), Strunk has raised this specific claim of<'illegal alien" vote dilution

in atleast three prior federal lawsuits. See, e.g.. Strunk v. State of California, eta!.. 1: 16-cv-

1496. (BKS/DJS) (N.O.N.Y. May 19, 2017); Forjone v. State ofCalifornia, et al .. No. 1:06-

CV1002 (LEKJRFT), 2010 WL 653651 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2010), aff'd, 425 F. App'x 73 (2d

Cir. 20 11); Strunk v. United States Dep 't of Commerce, Bureau oft he Census, et al., Civ. No.

09-1295 (RTL), 2010 WL 960428, *1 (D.D.C. Mar. 15, 2010).

In the instant case, Strunk alleges three, equally baseless, causes of action: (1) a claim

that New York and others have conspired to commjt " infanticide': through passage of the RHA;

(2) a claim that New York and others have conspired to seek "Unjust Rein1bursement From

2

Federal Defendants•' for commission of ''infanticide, ; and (3) a claim that New York has denied

Plaintiff equal protection under the law by harboring illegal aliens and by facilitating voting by

illegal aliens. Complaint~~ 51-58. Strunl( seeks to restrain all defendants from ''acting under

color of the RHA or similar directive." Complaint at 20.

PROCEDURAL IDSTORY

Strunk conunenced the instant action on February 14, 2019, and sought a temporary

restraining order and preliminary injunction. On March 12, 2019, tbe Court issued an order

denying Strunk's request for preliminary injunctive relief. and advising Strunk to "proceed by

the standard procedures and rules of this district upon proper service and joinder'· of parties. On

March 15,2019, defendants Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., Voice for Choice:

Planned Parenthood of New York City Action Fund, Inc. filed an answer to the complaint.

Docket No. 18. On April 12, 2019, defendants Andrew M. Cuomo .. Carl E. Heastie, Andrea

Stewart-Cousins, and the State ofNew York (the "State Defendants") and The City ofNew York

and Wanen "Bill De Blasia" Wilhelm, Jr. (the ' 'City Defendants") (collectively, the ':New York

Defendants") moved to dismiss the complajnt. Docket Nos. 30-31.

ARGUMENT

1. Standard of Review

A. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure l2(b)( 1)

"A case is properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b )( 1)

when the district court lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate it.', A1akarova v.

United States, 201 F.3d 110, 113 (2d Cir. 2000). "In resolving a motion to dismiss tor Jack of

subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(l), a district court .. . may refer to evidence outside

the pleadings!' Id. at 113. "When the question to be considered is one involving the jurisdiction

3

of a federal comt, jurisdiction must be shown affu·matively, and that showing is not made by

drawing from the pleadings inferences favorable to the party asseJiing it" Shippin~ Fin. Servs.

Corp. v. Drakos, 140 F.3d 129, 131 (2d Cir. 1998). Thus, "a plaintiff asserting subject matter

jurisdiction has the bmden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it exists .. ,

Makarova, 201 F.3d at 113.

B, Federal Rule of Civil Procedw-e 12(b)(6)

To survive a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedw-e Rule 12(b)(6), each

claim in a pleading must set forth sufficient factual allegations, accepted as true, :'to state a claim

to relief that is plausible on its face." Ashcroft v .. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662. 678 (2009) (citation and

quotation marks omitted). In applying this standard, the Cowt must ''accept[] all factual

Allegf!tioos in the complaint as true, and draw[ ] all reasonable inferences in the pla.iutiffs favor."

Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc ... 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir. 2002). However, the Cowi need not

credit "legal conclusions" in a c.lairn or "threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action,

suppmted by mere conclusory statements." Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009)

(quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678) (internal quotations and alteration omitted). In addition, "only a

complaint that states a plausible claim for relief survives a motion to dismiss," and

" [d]etennining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief will ... be a context-specific

task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense." !d.

(quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679) (intemal quotations omitted).

When considering a motion to dismiss brought against a prose litigant, the complaint and

pleadings of a prose plaintiff must be liberally construed in favor of that patiy and held to a less

rigorous standard of review than pleadings drafted by an attorney. See Angulo v. Nassau Cnty.,

89 F.Supp.3d 541 , 548-49 (E.D.N.Y. 2015). The Second Circuit "liberally construe[s] pleadings

4

and briefs submitted by pro se litigants, reading such submissions to raise the strongest

arguments they suggest." Bertin v. United States) 478 F.3d 489, 491 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal

quotation marks and citations omitted).

II. All of Plaintiff's Causes of Action Must Be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure l2(b)(l).

As noted above, Strunk asse1ts three causes of action in his Complaint (I) a claim that

New York and others have conspired to commit "infanticide'' tlu·ough passage of the RHA; (2) a

claim that New York and others have conspiJ:ed to seek "Unjust Reimbursement From Federal

Defendants" for commission of"infanticide"; and (3) a claim that New York has denied Plaintiff

equal protection under the law by harboring illegal aliens and by facilitating voting by illegal

aliens. Complaint~~ 51-58. (Each of these causes of action relies upon Strunk's regurgitation of

quotations, materials, allegations and conspiracy theories culled from various websites and other

sources, and none states a viable cause of action against the Federal Defendants.

A. Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Assert His Claims Against the Federal Defendants

"Article Ill ofthe Constitution confines the judicia] power offederal courts to deciding

actual 'Cases ' or "Cu11troversies." Hollingsworth v. Perry, _ U .S . ._._,; 13J S. Ct. 2652, 2661

(2013). Standing is "'the threshold question in every federal case," Warth v. Seldin, 422 U .S.

490, 498 (1975), and "one essential aspect of this requirement is that any person invoking the

power of a federal court must demonstrate standing to do so. Hollingsworth, 133 S. Ct. at 2661.

Leaving aside the fact that Strunk has not expressly alleged any claims against the Federal

Defendants, it is clear that Struck does not have standing to bring whatever claims he may, in

fact, be attempting to assert against them.

To establish Article ill standing, a plaintiff must plead three elements: (1) ~'injury in

fact," (2) a :'causal connection" between the injury and the challenged act, and (3) that the injury

5

"likely'· would be "redressed by a favorable decision.'' Lujan v. Defenders ofWildlife, 504 U.S.

555, 560-61 (1992) (citations and internal quotations omitted). "The party invoking federal

jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing these elements.'' ld. at 561. In the standing context,

the Supreme CoUlt "presume[s] that federal courts lackjurisdiction unless the contrary appears

afiirmatively from the record." DaimlerCh1ysler v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 n.3 (2006) (quoting

Renne v. Gemy, 501 U.S. 312,316 (199 1)). An "injury in fact" means '~an invasion of a legally

protected interest which is (a) concrete and patiicularized ... and (b) actual or imminent, not

conjectural or hypothetical." Lzgan 504 U.S. at 560-61 (intemal quotations and citations

omitted). That injury "must affect the plaintiff in a personal and individual way ."' ]d. at 560 n. l.

See also Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811, 819 (1997) ("a plaintiffs complaint must establish that he

has a 'persona] stake: in the alleged dispute, and that the alleged injury suffered is patticularized

as to him"). In cases where •<a constihttional question is presented," the Supreme Court has

·'strictly adhered to the standing requirements to ensure that our deliberations will have tbe

benefit of adversary presentation and a full development of the relevant facts ."' Bender v.

Williamsport Area Sch. Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541-42 (1986). The Supreme Court has observed

that ''[t]he requirement of actual injury rcdressable by the court ... tends to assure that the legal

questions presented to the cowt will be resolved, not in the rarified atmosphere of a debating

society, but in a concrete factual context conducive to a realistic appreciation of the

consequences of judicial action." !d. (internal quotations and citatio11s omitted).

It js clear that Strunk faUs to allege any actual imminent specific hann which is

individualized to him in his Complajnt. Strunk does not allege anything about himself which is

different from any of the millions of persons living in the State ofNew York. The most that

Stmn.k clearly alleges about himself is that he has an address for service of process in the

6

Notihem District of New York. and that he is a serial pro se litigant. Complaint~ 1. Other than

an1biguous references to the dilution ofhis ''voting property[,]" Plainti.tfmakes no allegation of

how he has been injured by the RHA, or any of the alleged conspiracies involving the State of

New York. or how any putative injury would be redressed by a remedial order against the

Federal Defendants. Accordingly, Strunk' s allegations are so abstract, attenuated, and

speculative as a matter of law that they fai l on all tlu·ee prongs of the test for standing - injury,

causation, and redressability, and Stnmk has failed to meet his burden of articulating a ground

for Article III standing to assert any claims against the Federal Defendants.

As noted above, in at least tlu-ee prior federal cases, Strunk alleged that his voting rights

would be diluted by the votes of alleged "illegal alien" voters. In each case, tl1e Plaintiff's

claims were dismissed because, inter alia, Strunk failed to allege any concrete injury. See Strunk

v. State ofCalifornia. et al. , 1:16-cv-1496, slip op. at 15; F01jone, 2010 \VL 653651 , at *4;

Strunk v. US Dep't ofCornmerce, 2010 WL 960428, at *3 ("<[Strunk's} challenge to the 2010

Census raises an "abstract question[] of wide public significance:' Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S.

490, 500 (1975), and thus he fails to allege an injmy in fact, that is, 'an invasion of a legally

protected interest which is (a) concrete and pruiicularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not

conjectural or hypothetical."') (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560

(1992)).

Tlus is equally true to the extent that Strunk is clainung the existence of a conspiracy

involving New York State to violate the law (and " to create dependency or to force opponents to

leave" the state). Tlus claim alleges no concrete harm to Strunk. As the District Court for the

District of Columbia held in dismissing one of Strunk' s many frivolous actions:

The Supreme Court has "consistently held that a plaintiff raising only a generally available grievance about government-claiming only harm to his and every

7

citizen's interest in proper application of the Constitution and laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the public at lru:ge-does not state an Article III case or controversy." Where, as here, "[p]laintiffs stake is no greater and his status no more differentiated than that of millions of other votersL] ... his harm is too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters."

See Strunkv. NY Province ofSoc. q(Jesus. 2010 WL 816121 , at *2 (D.D.C. Mar. 8, 2010)

(internal citation omitted). As Stnmk lacks standing to assert his claims, the Complaint must be

dismissed.

B. Sovereign Immunity

The Complaint must also be dismissed because any claims that Strunk may be attempting

to assett against the Federal Defendants are barred by sovereign immunity. It is elementary that

"[t]be United States, as sovereign, is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued · · ·, and the

terms of its consent to be sued in any court define that coU1t's jurisdiction to enteJtain the suit..,

United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 586 ( 1941). A waiver of sovereign immunity "cam1ot

be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'' United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969).

[tis axiomatic that an individual cannot sue the United States, its agencies, or its officers in their

officjal capacities, without an express waiver of sovereign immunity. See Uniled States v.

Jvfitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976);

Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 586. "The shield of sovereign immunity protects not only the United

States but also its agencies and officers when the latter act in their official capacities." Dotson v.

Griesa, 398 F.3d 156; 177 (2d Ci.r. 2005). As Plaintiff bas not alleged any specific waiver of the

United States' sovereign immunity here which would allow for subject matter jurisdiction of

claims against tbe Federal Defendants, each of his causes of action must be dismissed. 1

To U1e extent that Strunk's claims are construed as claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), they are still subject to dismissal as the FTCA does not provide a waiver of sovereign

8

III. Each of Plaintiff's Claims Must Be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Cause of Action.

In addition to the foregoing threshold jurisdictional defects, Strunk's Complaint must a lso

be dismissed because each of his causes of action fai ls as a matter of law. At most, Plaintiffs

Complaint consists of a series of conclusory statements, supported by a regurgitation of

misstatements, quotations, matelials, allegations and conspiracy theories culled from various

websites and other sources .. None of these allegations involves any purported conduct on the part

of the Federal Defendants. As such, none of his causes of action state a viable claim against the

Federal Defendants.

A. Substantive Due Process

Strunk's first cause of action alleges that the "New York and Other Defendants" have

conspired to "commit infanticide Wlder color ofRHA". Strunk contends that this conspiracy

amounts to a denjaJ of substantive due process rights "among citizens similarly situated."' This

cause of action, by jts terms, states no claim against the Federal Defendants. Even if it could be

construed to state a claim against the Federal Defendants, it must be dismissed. "A substantive

due process claim has two elements: (1) identi 6cation of the constitutional right at stake, and (2)

consideration of whether the state action was arbitrary in a constitutional sense." See Drain v.

Freeport Union Free Sch. Dist., No. 14-CV-1959 SJF, 2015 WL 1014451, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.

9, 2015); Btyant v, City ofNew York No. 99 Civ. 11237,2003 WL 22861926, at *8 (S.D.N.Y.

Dcc.2, 2003) (citing Lowrance v. Achtyl, 20 F.3d 529, 537 (2d Cir.l994)). As Strunk has neither

identified a constitutional right which has been c!.enied to him nor identified any alleged arbitrary

immunity for constitutional torts. Akeem v. United States, 854 F. Supp. 2d 289, 295 n.5 (,E.D.N. Y. 20 12) (citing FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471,477- 78 ( 1994)).

9

state action directed at him which deprived him of such a right~ his first cause of action fails as a

matter oflaw.2

B. Equal protection

Strunk's second cause of action alleges an unspecified denial of equal protection under

the law by the ·'New York and Other Defendants" to ''seek unjust reimbursement fi·om federal

defendants." By its tenus, tllis cause of action states no claim against the Federal Defendants.

Even if it could be construed to state a claim against the Federal Defendants, it must be

dismissed. A claim of violation of equal protection by selective enforcement of the law

generally has two elements: ''(1) the person, compared with others similarly situated. was

selectively treated; and (2) that such selective treatment was based on impemussible

considerations such as race, religion, intent to inhibit or pmlish the exercise of constitutional

rights, or malicious or bad faith intent to injure a person." LaTrieste Rest. & Cabaret Inc. v.

Village of Port Chester. 40 F.3d 587,590 (2d Cir. 1994). Under Village ofWil[owbrookv.

Olech 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000) (per curiam). an individuaL not alleging invidious

discrimination on the basis of membership in some group, may nevertheless prevail on an equal

protection claim provided she shows that (1) "she has been intentionally treated differently from

others similarly situated and" (2) "there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment." As

Strunk's second cause of action contains no allegation that he was intentionally treated

differently than other similarly situated persons, his second cause of action fails as a matter of

law.

To the e~ient that SlTUJlk bas claimed standing to sue as ··next best fiiend good Samaritan[,]" that claim lacks merit because be has made no showing that he bad any purported relationsh ip to the real party in interest. See. e.g., Ross ex rei. Dunham v. Lantz. 408 F.3d l21, 123 (2d Cir. 2005) (citing Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 154 (1990)).

lo

C. Equal protection conspiracy

Strunk's third cause of action alleges a conspiracy to deprive him of equal protection

under the law in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 by the "New York and Other Defendants,'' and by

its tenns states no claim against the Federal Defendants. Even if it could be construed to state a

claim against the Federal Defendants, it must be dismissed. To make out a violation of Section

1985) a plaintiff"must allege and prove four elements: (1) a conspiracy; (2) for the purpose of

depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of

the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; and (3) an act in furtherance of

the conspiracy; (4) whereby a person is either injured in his person or property or deprived of

any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States.'' Robinson v. Allstate Ins. Co .. 508 Fed.

App'x 7, 9 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting United Bhd. of Carpenters v. Scott. 463 U .S. 825, 828-29

(1983)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Witb respect to the second element, a plaintiff must

show that the conspiracy was motivated by "'some racial or perhaps otherwise class-based,

invidious discriminatory animus .... " !d. (quoting Britt v. Garcia, 457 F.3d 264, 270 n. 4 (2d Cjr.

2006)) (internal quotation omitted); see also Posr v. Court Officer Shield No. 207, 180 F.3d 409,

419 (2d Cir. 1999); Mian v. Donaldson Lz<!fkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp. , 7 F.3d 1085, l 087 (2d Cir.

1993). It is patently clear that Strunk has failed to allege any facts which would establish a cause

of action LUlder Section 1985 and, accordingly, his third cause of action fails as a matter of law.

11

CONCLUSION

For all the foregoing reasons, the Federal Defendants respectfully submit that Plaintiffs

Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and that the Cotut should grant

such other and further relief it deems just and proper.

Dated: May 10, 20 19 GRANT C. JAQUITH

United States Attorney

Northern District ofNew York

By: /s/JohnD. Hoggan. Jr.

12

JOl-IN D. HOGGAN, JR. Assistant United States Attorney

Bar Roll No. 511254

James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse

445 Broadway, Room 218

Albany~ NY 12207

Telephone: (518) 431-0247

Facsimile: (518) 431-0249

john.hoggan@usdoj. gov




EXHIBIT 52

�� !"#$%&'(�)*$#!"#$+,�� -./*01�2�(3�4�� 5*/).��26�7*/)��8�/09:/�;).<=,��>� [email protected]�**9��>�C�D).E�'*��./.:/�;).<=F ��,��4��3�4��G ��H�(;�� !"#$%&�� !"#$%,�� -./*01�2�(G �� [email protected]�**9,��>� C/;)�I/*J@��>�?/��JIB7/��-**G ��

KLMNOPQRSLQTNQRKLMNOPQRULVWQTQSLQTNQRXYZ[\] _abcdefgh\ijk[gl\mmZ[\k_noZghpZ[jk[q\gmkrsmmkhskl[km[_ZptZjku\rsklv[gm_wsokghpZ[jk[x[g\lgyuzkyvm_{ogmktZvhk|ogkpZpsmppmZx[khgrk\mzZ\ur}[vjy\rnhlogkpZphmppmZ~Zo\�w�kuu_rv[g\�oghmk\v[khskl[km[_ZptZjku\rsklv[gm_w�gkuhk\nhlZ\pg[jkr hskl[km[_ZptZjku\rsklv[gm_Z\zklkjYk[�be�dw�ZuuZng\�ok[yyZg\mjk\mb�gkuhk\nhmh�krngmogjyukjk\mmgZ\Zp}[vjyrjg\ghm[mgZ\pjgu_hky[mgZ\yZugl_wsokhvYjgmmkrok[[khg�\mgZ\Z\iy[gudbe�cbnogloljkg\mZkppklmmo[kkr_humk[w��4�� 4��-�)./;)-.1�.2��A/�)*9J�(/�/;)-.(-*)�9�-�0��).�)0�.;J�-�0��/<�.;J�2J�-�;�/�</J��/;@J-��)<�/.;�@)*0��.).7��2J;-09��J)<./;)-.��g[hm�k\]glokuk�gkuhk\nhYZ[\Z\] _abcdebg\|ZuZ[rZsy[g\�hb|ZuZ[rZbmZxo_uugh]glokuk�gkuhk\\r~jkh]ltk\[_�gkuhk\bYZmoq\gmkrsmmkhi[j_yo_hglg\hw�e��gkuhk\�hpmok[ghZpz\gho\lkhm[_nogukok[jZmok[ghZp�mug\rkhlk\mw}okZurkhmZpmo[kklogur[k\b�gkuhk\ohhghmk[bihouk_b\rY[Zmok[b�ukmlok[w�ZuuZng\��gkuhk\�hYg[mobmokpjgu_[kuZlmkrp[Zj|ZuZ[rZsy[g\�hmZ|uk[nmk[b�uZ[grw��

��ROQRON��MT�TL�Q�R�Q��V�OL�R

�� !"��#$�%&��'��(� )��*!+&��(�,"�-�.!�/�0�123�45'��6�� 67�� %3�+28&��931"&�&:3&�+&��9��;��<��,!�!��-!�=>�3�4+�,!�!��-!��?$=$@�� A&!�4&2!B�?�3C&�+32��0D=5�?�3C&�+32��!/E3�43�3��0�F5GHIIHJKLM�NKMN�OPNHHIQ�RKSIOSL�TUUSLVSV�UNS�WSHXMSUHJL�YPNHHI�HZGHXSKML�YSX[KPSQ�MXTV\TUKLM�JKUN�T�]TPNSIHX�HZ�YPKSLPS�VSMXSS�YNSUNSL�TUUSLVSV�UNS�_LK[SXOKU�HZ�aKXMKLKT�YPNHHI�HZ�bTJQ�XSPSK[KLM�NSXc\XKO�dHPUHX�KL�efffghi�YNS�TIOH�UHHj�cTkTLSOS�OU\VKSO�TU�RTLlTL_LK[SXOKUQ�KL�RTMHTQ�cTkTLgmiRKSIOSL�OSX[SV�V\XKLM�UNS�WSHXMS�n �]\ON�TVoKLKOUXTUKHL�TO�YkSPKTIpOOKOUTLU�UH�UNS�qXSOKVSLU�TLV�TO�OSLKHX�dKXSPUHX�ZHX�qXS[SLUKHLQqXSkTXSVLSOO�TLV�rSOkHLOS�sqqrt�TU�UNS�nNKUS�uH\OS�uHoSITLVYSP\XKU�vH\LPKI�YNS�TIOH�OSU�\kQ�TLV�ISV�TO�pOOKOUTLU�pVoKLKOUXTUHXQUNS�wXTLOkHXUTUKHL�YSP\XKU�pVoKLKOUXTUKHLxO�yZZKPS�HZ�bSMKOITUK[SqHIKP�TLV�WH[SXLoSLU�pZZTKXOpZUSX�IST[KLM�UNS�]\ON�TVoKLKOUXTUKHL�KL�z{{|Q�RKSIOSL�}SPToS�UNSZH\LVSX�TLV�qXSOKVSLU�HZ�Y\LSOKO�vHLO\IUKLMg~i�wNS�ZKXoxO�HLIKLSkXHZKIS�IKOUSV�NSX�TO�KUO�HLI�SokIHSSQ�JKUN�UNS�ZKXoxO�kNHLS�L\o}SX}SKLM�RKSIOSLxO�kSXOHLTI�PSIIkNHLSg�i��L�YSkUSo}SX�z{e��UNS�PHokTLJHL�T�ZSVSXTI�PHLUXTPUQ�JKUN�TL�KLKUKTI�TJTXV�HZ�T}H\U��hm{Q{{{Q�UH��kXH[KVS�kHIKP�TLV�ISMKOITUKHLQ�USPNLKPTIJXKUKLMQ�TLV�HXMTLKlTUKHLTI�VS[SIHkoSLU��UH�UNS�GSVSXTI��oSXMSLP��TLTMSoSLU�pMSLP g|iRKSIOSL�JTO�T�OSLKHX�oSo}SX�HZ�UNS�rSOKIKSLPS�wTOj�GHXPS�HZ�UNS�vSLUSX�ZHX�v}SX��uHoSITLV�YSP\XKUvHooKUUSS�TU�WSHXMS�nTONKLMUHL�_LK[SXOKU�TLV�OSX[SV�HL�UNS�WIH}TI�rKOjO�rSkHXU�pV[KOHX�]HTXV�HZ�UNS�nHXIV�PHLHoKP�GHX\oghiRKSIOSL�OSX[SV�TO�cHNL�G��SIIxO�PNKSZ�HZ�OUTZZ�TU�UNS�_LKUSV�YUTUSO�dSkTXUoSLU�HZ�uHoSITLV�YSP\XKU�sduYt�TZUSXNS�TOO\oSV�UNTU�kHOKUKHL�HL�cTL\TX�z{Q�z{e�gfige{i��L�STXI�YSkUSo}SX�z{e�Q��\OU�H[SX�T�oHLUN�TZUSX��SII}SPToS�nNKUS�uH\OS�vNKSZ�HZ�YUTZZ�HL�c\I��eQ�z{e�Q�RKSIOSL�oH[SV�UH�UNS�nNKUS�uH\OSQ�}SPHoKLM�UNS�kXKLPKkTIdSk\U�vNKSZ�HZ�YUTZZ�\LVSX��SIIgeeigezige{iyL�yPUH}SX�eeQ�z{e�Q�qXSOKVSLU�dHLTIV�wX\ok�LHoKLTUSV�RKSIOSL�UH�}S�UNS�LSJ�_LKUSV�YUTUSO�YSPXSUTX�HZuHoSITLV�YSP\XKUQ�XSkITPKLM�pPUKLM�YSPXSUTX��ITKLS�d\jSge�igehi�yL�dSPSo}SX�mQ�z{e�Q�UNS�YSLTUS�PHLZKXoSVNSX�LHoKLTUKHLQ�}�T�~z��[HUSgemi�yL�dSPSo}SX�~Q�z{e�Q�ONS�JTO�OJHXL�KL�TO�YSPXSUTX�HZ�uHoSITLVYSP\XKUge~ige�i

�� ¡��¢��£��

�� !��"��#��$��%��"��&��'��'��(�&)�(��*��"��+��+��&��,��&��&��"��'��)��%�� -! � !��+.��"��+��+��+��"��'�� ! �! ��!�(��*��&)�/��)��"��"��"��'��"��&��''��"��"��+.��&��)��"��+��+0��.��&��+ �1! �2! �3!��"��&��&�4��5��0��)��&��'��)��6��'7��'��)��"��&��0��)��&��&��4�� ! �!�8��"��9'��''��'��$��%�� :!��;��&��1�� "��'��"��&��*��;��&��(��&��%��&��<��;��&��6��.�� !,��;�� &��"��"��&��&��7��&��&��<�� '��&��'�&��6��'��&��,��80.��5.,��,�� :�"��<��'��&��"��&��'�6��'�"��=��"��'��'��.��&��5��'��7��&��&��<�� &�� -!��;�� &)��&)��"��&��&��7�� 1 !.�� "��<��"�� &��+�&��&�'�+�� 1!�,��,�'��&��8��,�'��5��"��*��,��9��05��-�� <��*��>��&�� $��,��9��)��<��(��6��'��'��+.��&��'��&��&��"��'��&��'��&��'��.��)�"��"��&��"��'��&��&��+ 1�! 11! 12!�*�� ?��'��&��&��%��)�� <��@��;��<��)��*��*��+(��"��*��6��'��"��&��&��&��'��A+�*��7��'��"��B�+C��.�"��"��0�&��)��<��'��&)��+ 13! 1!

DEFGHIJK�LEJMGJK�HNOEKP�HQJ�RNHQRS�RSSETJ�NG�HQJ�GEUHQ�VWXWXJTFJHNFY�RS�ZR[JMNK\�XJT]FEHY

LEJMGJK�NH�N�FJGG�TRKSJFJKTJ\]FEKP�X]JF�_R M�abbc�dJeF]NFYfghi

�� !��"��#�� $��%�� &��'��!��(��)��*+��+,*-��.�� %��%��/��0"��#�� 1��%�� %�� 2�%��"�� 0�� $1�%��3��4��5�� 4��%��4��6� ��%�� %�� %�� 07-1078107914��:��%��+,*8��(��%�� 2��' � �� 5�� (��' � �� 0;,14��<��+,*9��=��>��?��(� ��?��%��!��.4��(��?��+7�� @�� '��%�� %��2��A��(��(�:�>��?��/�� 0;*10;+10;710;;1:��>��-��+,*8��#�� $��' � B>��%�� 0;C10;D1��>��*C��+,*8��&��0;-1�#�� ' � B>��%�� 0;814��<��+,*8��#�� %��E0;910C,10C*1�FGH�IJKGLMNOPM�QPKO��&��%��$�� :�� 0C+1��#�� +�,,, �� 0C,1�(��$�� %�� 0;91

RSTS�UVWXYZ[V\Z�]�_aZbcVdUVWXYZ[V\Z�]�e][VfX\g�TVcYbZhdUVWXYZ[V\Z�]�i][[VYcV�X\gjVgVYXf�kYVX�]�l\mVaZbnXZb]\X\\]\cVa�op�cYb[b\Xf�cqXYnVaXnXb\aZ�rsita�e XuVb�X\gvX\wq]�xV\nyz{|}~��z�z�|��}|�~�bVfaV\d�TVcYVZXYh�r][WV]dTVcYVZXYh�x\cqb\�X\g��gmba]Y�aq\VY�ubZq�xV�bcX\�rYVabgV\Z��fVcZ��WVw��YXg]Yd�_fh��pd�o��

�� !�� !� �� "�#� $�� ! �� !�� %�� &� �� " �� %�� ! �� #�'��!�� #�(�� "�� !��!��!�� !��!��!�#�'��!��# )*+,�'�� -.(�� //* �� /0��!� �� !�� 12�� 3��#�4��!�� #)*0,� �� ! ��$� ��.��(��.��(�� ! �� #)**,�� 5 �� #)**,�(�� !�� "��'�� 6� ��(��#)**,�7�� 2��8��(�� (��9�� " ��(��3 ��#)**,�(��"�� 3 ��!��!�� #)*:,��9��!��'��!�� "��!��'��#)*:,�� ;<�� "�� !��'�� ;<�� "�� 5��1�� #)*=,),�(��>?@ABAC?�� "�� <�� "�� !� �� <�� "��#),7��(��DEF�GHBFICFJB�� " �� 5�� " ��2�� +�� K6#(#�� 5�� 7�� (��" ��4��L�� 7�� ;��M�� <�� #�2�� "� �� #)*�,7��/�(��#��3��K-1��#M�!�� N47�- �� 2#�$��O�P###��N47�� "�� !��(�� Q��)��,�" ��6#(#��R��:��6#(#��R��"�� &��#S)*/,��-�� "�� #):�,�� &��#):�,):,TUVWXVY�ZU[\�]VU_Y�abVXUcVY[dYbUefV�aVg�TUV[hi�j_[hkVb�limnop

qrstus�vwxvtuwyz

�� !�� "��#��$%��$&'(�� )�� *��+�� *� ��,�� #�� -��.� �� #�� /012/032/0%2�!�� #�� 4��/002�5�� #�� 65�� #�� #�� 7� �� 6/082�� #� ��4��6��6�� #�� /082�� 6� � �� 0&&�� 6/082�,��69�� 6�� #� ��:�� 6��$8&�� 6�� 6�� #�� 6�5 �� $&�� /0(2�:�� #��;�� .�� #��#�� #� �� /0<25�� =��*��8�#��+�� #��*�� -��.�� >*-.?��#�� :�� #�>�:�?��(��$&'(�/8&2/8'2,�� *�� @��$3��$&'(��9� �+A�4�,��(�#��#��+�� #��*-.�/8$2/812�5�� /832��$0��$&'(�� 6� #�� 6�� #� ��#� �� *�� +�� *-.�� !�� #�� #�� #�� #�6�� #� � �� 6�� B�� 6��B�� 6/832/8%2/8$2�5�� /832��$0��$&'(��6�� #�� 7��#�� /��2�,�� 7�� 7�� #�*��#�� 6/8325��#�$&'(��CDE�FEG�HIJK�CLMEN�� .�� !�� /802�!�� !�� :�� !�� #�/802�!�� OIPLQLRI��S� ��#�� :��/882/8(2�� /882

TUVWXV�YZX[\]�_]X�U�\XYVZY]

aXY\b]�U�cdZVY[\�ebdfWVX[�d[�gTh�e_]\UWi

jX]dZ[Y\dU[

�� !��"��#��$�� !�� %�� %��&#'($�� )*��+�� ,-�� .��&#'($"�� -�.��/�� ,&�&�0��1��!��0�� &#2�$�" �� "��,��/��0��3�� 4��#2�$��&�5�� %�� )��6��&%#2�$#2�$1��'��.�� 789:;<=�'�� "�� .��.�� &#2>$�?��2�� .� ��%�� %� �� )��)��.�� &#2@$5��A��B��6��C�4B��6��D�� %�� .�� B�� %&#2'$EFGH�IJ�JKLMNK�OPFHKQ�RHMHKG�SMTFPKH�RKUVKHMVFKGWX�YMZNQKVG[�\MH]KVFPK�_VFN�a[�bcWdeX�fgKMVHLKPH�IJ�hILKNMPQ�RKUZVFHi�RKUVKHMVi�\FVGHjKP�kFKNGKP�VKGFlPGf�]HHGmnnMTUPKoGXlIXUILnpINFHFUGnQKMVHLKPHq]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHiqGKUVKHMViqrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqNKMsFPlqMQLFPFGHVMHFIPnGHIVitFQuvbbwxcwveX�yz{�|}~�X��KHVFKsKQ�_VFN�Wc[�bcWdXbX�f��]MH�G�kIH�H]K�\FVGHjKP��K�\PIo�f�]HHGmnnoooXINFHFUIXUILnLMlM�FPKnGHIVinbcWancxncbnrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqFLLFlVMHFIPqUVFGFGqJIVLKVqUINNKMlZKGqbWadwdeX��{��}X��KHVFKsKQ��ZNi�b[�bcWaXwX�fhILKNMPQ�RKUZVFHi�RKUVKHMVi�kILFPKK�\FVGHjKP�kFKNGKP��KGHFJFKG�SIPJFVLMHFIPf�]HHGmnnoooXUqGMPXIVlnsFQKInt�wva�xqWn]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHiqGKUVKHMViqPILFPKKqrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqHKGHFJFKGqUIPJFVLMHFIPq]KMVFPleX�{��y|��X�_VU]FsKQ�]HHGmnnoKTXMVU]FsKXIVlnoKTnbcWacWWbc�bvbxn]HHGmnnoooXUqGMPXIVlnsFQKInt�wva�xqW�bY]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHiqGKUVKHMViqPILFPKKqrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqHKGHFJFKGqUIPJFVLMHFIPq]KMVFPle�JVIL�H]K�IVFlFPMNIP��MPZMVi�Wb[�bcWaX��KHVFKsKQ��MPZMVi�WW[�bcWaX�X��FNNFMLGIP[��VFU��UHITKV�WW[�bcWxeX�f\FVGHjKP�kFKNGKP��dd��M KQ�JIV��I�pIGH�MH�hILKNMPQ�RKUZVFHif�]HHmnnUIPHKPHXNMoXsFVlFPFMXKQZnPKoGnbcWxWcnrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqddqHM KQqHIqIGHq]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHieX��}�� ¡��¢��~X�_VU]FsKQ�]HHGmnnoKTXMVU]FsKXIVlnoKTnbcWacWcacbb��dn]HHmnnUIPHKPHXNMoXsFVlFPFMXKQZnPKoGnbcWxWcnrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPqddqHM KQqHIqIGHq]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHie�JVIL�H]K�IVFlFPMN�IP��MPZMVi�a[�bcWaX£X�f\FVGHjKP�kFKNGKPm��¤KUZHFsK�pVIJFNK�¥�¦FIlVM]i�§�¦NIILTKVlf�]HHGmnnoooXTNIILTKVlXUILnVKGKMVU]nGHIUrGnVFsMHKnKVGIPXMGtKVGIPQuw�wdx£cw¥VFsUM Qux�xbbxdeX�¦NIILTKVl�EXpX��KHVFKsKQ��ZPK�Wd[�bcWaXvX�\ZHPKV[�©M¤X�f�]I�FG�\FVGHjKP�kFKNGKP[��VZL �G�VKIVHKQ�FUr�JIV�RKUVKHMVi�IJ�hILKNMPQ�RKUZVFHitf�]HHmnnoooXPKoGoKKrXUILno]IqrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPq]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHiqGKUVKHMViqPILFPKKqvabxbxeX�|}~�~}}ªX�_VU]FsKQ]HHGmnnoKTXMVU]FsKXIVlnoKTnbcWxWcWbc�£bban]HHmnnoooXPKoGoKKrXUILno]IqrFVGHjKPqPFKNGKPq]ILKNMPQqGKUZVFHiqGKUVKHMViqPILFPKKqvabxbxe�JVIL�H]K�IVFlFPMN�IP��UHITKV�Wb[�bcWxX��KHVFKsKQ��UHITKV�WW[�bcWxX

«¬¬�®°±¬²¬³¬µ¬

�� !��"��!��#��$%&��#"�� "��'(�� &�)**�� #+��#&��%*&� ��*��,� ��",��$%&,"��, ��,�#+��,�-��,�%%�+��#,��, �%� �#",��$��,��*��*��*�.*.!"/�/��,��!�,��,�!0�,.��""��1�2�� % ��345�67849:;<=:�>=8<�?((��0�,��/�� &�)**�� "��+*��#*��0�,��/��@��-�"��$#��0��'(�A�"�� B%��+�#��#�+�%�#��C+�#�� &�)**+�-��!��%*��#��*��"* ��1��1��1//��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��1��* ��&�)**+�-��!��%*��#��*��"* ��1��1��1//��%�� +�#� ��#�D��!��1��@��-�"�D��!��0��E��F�#�� #�� &�)**�� +�$��"$*��F�#,#�� #��G5:<5H�I=H�J=K5L7:M�N5OPH9<QR�S5=H;5�67849:;<=:T:9U5H89<Q��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��0��1��* ��&�)**�� +�$��"$*��F�#,#�� #��%�� +�#� ��#�(�&��%!��@��-�"�(�&��%!��0��E��F�#�� #��#��V&��# �%� �#"��#"�#��#� ��$��&� ��+��#"��%�#�� $��#�� #��$��$��&��#��#� $"�#+��!��$��&��&��"#��&�#��#"��#��"�#��%�#�+�%�#��#��%��#�� #+��%�#��#"��#� ��#"��%�#�+�%�#��+�#�W��#� �"�-� �&%�#�� "��X$��%�#��#� ��$�� #"��%%$#��#��#"��#�#+��#"��V��&��+��%��Y��"�#��#� "��$%&�C##�$#��Z ��'�$��C&&��#�%�#�� &�)**�� $��+�-*� �,&��,��*��*�0*�/*&��"�#�,"�#� ",F,��$%&,�##�$#��,� ��, �$��,�&&��#�%�#��345�649<5�J=P85�(�&��%!��/��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��0��..��* ��&�)**�� $��+�-*� �,&��,��*��*�0*�/*&��"�#�,"�#� ",F,��$%&,�##�$#��,� ��, �$��,�&&��#�%�#��%�� +�#� �#�(�&��%!��@��-�"�(�&��%!��0��E��F�#�� #��A ��"�� -��C��#�� Y��"�#��#"�Y��#��&� ��&$��[ ��(�� #��%�� -�"��[ ��(�� &��%�#��'�%� �#"�(��$��++��'�!��%�#�\ �##�� $� ��(�&��%!��Z ��'�$��[ ��(��'��#�B#�� &�)**��#��%��%*��*�0*��*$�*&� ��*F� #,�� ,� ��, �$�� % ��345�]5 �_=H�39K58��&��C�/�C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��0��/��* ��&�)**��#��%��%*��*�0*��*$�*&� ��*F� #,�� ,� ��, �$�� % ��%�� +�#� ��#�(�&��%!��@��-�"�(�&��%!��0��E� �!��#+�#+��'(�"�&$�� Z ��'�$�� &)**��V#��%*&� ��*��*��*�0*�� ,!��#+�#+," �,"�&$�,��,� ��, �$�� % ��A�V��[ �##� ��$ ��0��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��0�1�1��.�* ��&)**��V#��%*&� ��*��*��*�0*�� ,!��#+�#+," �,"�&$�,��,� ��, �$�� % ��%�� +�#� ��#�(�&��%!��1��@��-�"�(�&��%!��0��E��F�#�� #�� -�"�� $#"��E� ��'(�� !�� Z ��'�$��$%&��"%�#��#�� "A�V��1��-��$ ��'�� "��D��!��Z ��'�$��C�"��?��(� ��"��@$#�'�%� �#"�(��$��&��%�#�� &�)**��#��%��%*��*��*��*$�*&� ��*��F�#,#�� #, �%� �#",��$��,�� % ��345�]5 �_=H�39K58��?((��1/�,.11�� &�)**�� "��+*��#*�1/�,.11��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��..�0* ��&�)**��#��%��%*��*��*��*$�*&� ��*��F�#,#�� #, �%� �#",��$��,�� % ��%�� +�#� ��#�D��!��@��-�"�D��!��.��Y��C� ��a�&��D��!��$%&��&��E��F�#�� #�� "��&��%�#��'�%� �#"�(��$�� &�)**�� #+��#&��%*&� ��*��$%&,�V&��",��,��&,��F�#,#�� #,��, ��","�&��%�#�,��, �%� �#",��$��*��*��*��*��,��,��,0��,�/��..��0�2�� % ��34567849:;<=:�>=8<��?((��0�,��/�� &�)**�� "��+*��#*��0�,��/��C�� -�"�� &�)**��!�� -��+*��!*��1.��* ��&�)**�� #+��#&��%*&� ��*��$%&,�V&��",��,��&,��F�#,#�� #,��, ��","�&��%�#�,��, �%� �#",��$��*��*��*��*��,��,��,0��,�/��..��0�2�� % ��%� ��+�#� ��#�D��!��@��-�"�D��!��%!��(�#��#��%��E��F�#�� #��&�Z ��'�$��"�� "'�%� �#"�(��$�� &�)**�� #+��#&��%*#��*&� ��*�&*��*��*��*��#��,��#��%�,��F�#,#�� #,��, ��","�&��%�#�,��, �%� �#",��$��,�#�� #+,�,� ��,� ,��,F� #,�,�� 345�67849:;<=:>=8<��?((��0�,��/�� &�)**�� "��+*��#*��0�,��/��@��-�"��%!��/��

�� !!��"�#! ��!$%�&!�$!%�!'�� (��)*+,-./*0.�12�31/*4,05�6*78-9.:�;��<��=�$%�&��>��#�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�&�$%��&?$?@!�� !!��"�#! ��!$%�&!�$!%�!'�� (�A��"� �� ;��<��=�$%�&�B��#��;��<��=�$%�&��&�� =�B� ��;��<��@=�$%�&(�� =�C��>��=�D�E� A�� !!�� !$%�&!�$!%@!�!��!'�� A�� (��FG*�H*I�J1-K�F9/*L��D��%M�$�?MM�� !!��"!� !%M�$�?MM�(��>��#�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�&�$%@$M�?%�!�� !!�� !$%�&!�$!%@!�!��!'�� A�� (�A��"� �� ;��<��@=�$%�&��B��#��;��<��@=$%�&��N��C�� O�� A�� =��;�� A�� =�A�� "�� P#��"��A��Q ��;�� A�� <�A��Q �� E�� R�� !!�� "�#!��!��!��!%��NS$%�� S$%O�� A(��T;U(��>��#�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�N%$�%%�?N$V!�� !!�� "�#!��!��!��!%��NS$%�� S$%O�� A(��T;U(�A��"� �� U�<��%=�$%�N�B��#��R� ��N=�$%�N��V�� =�O��W��X��=�Y�� R� ��=�$%�N(��;��O��Z��"�Z�� "��"�� !!�� !$%�N!%�!��!��!'�� "!� ��(��E��>��#�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�N%��N%?%$�?!�� !!�� !$%�N!%�!��!��!'�� "!� ��(�A��"� �� R� ��N=�$%�N��B��#��R� ��N=�$%�N�$%��=�� "�� R� ��=�$%�N(�� A�� ZD�� Z�O��Z��Z �O�� "��X�� A�� <�� Z��"�� '�� !!��!��!$%�N!%�!��!��'�� A��M?��&V(��[149.971��>��#�� !!��!��!$%�N!%�!��!��'�� A��M?��&V(�A��"� �� R� ��=�$%�N��B��#��R� ��N=�$%�N��O��'�� Z�� \] �P ��;��A�� O��Z�� =�� "��=�� "�� Z��A��A��_��#�� =��_��$�� =�R� ��=�$%�N=�YPa=�bc�� d �� E��e��'��<��C��AA��A�� "�O��f�b��d�� !!��#��!�� !$%�N!�!��!��NV&@$$!��<��'��'�� "�� "(�>��#�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�N%��&�M�M%$!�� !!��#��!�� !$%�N!�!��!��NV&@$$!��<��'��'�� "�� "(�R� ��&=�$%�N=��C��<��'�� B��#��R� ��=�$%�N=��D��<�� "�� "�� =�� '��<�� =�� =�� =��A�� #��A��$$��PZ��A�=��W��AA=��'��R� ��=�$%�N(��>�<��A�� E�� "�� !!��<��#��"!��<!$%�N%��V%�%@@%!�� !!�� "� ��!��!�'��<��#��"�� !$%�N!%�!��!V��$��?�A��&��?�<��M��?@M%<�N&g��(��FG*�h,LG90i.10�[1L.��D��%�V%�N$N�� !!��"!� !%�V%�N$N�(��>��#��A��"� �� !!�� "� ��!��!�'��<��#��"�� !$%�N!%�!��!V��$��?�A��&��?�<��M��?@M%<�N&g��(�� R� ��V=�$%�N��B��#��R� ��N=�$%�N��Q �� X�� "�A��<��B��<�� ;�� R��E��=�� A�� "�� "��"�� "�O��$M��O��Z�� =�� =�� Z�' ��A�� !!�� '��!'�� &N$�&N(��H*ILI**K��R� ��=�$%�N�B��#��U�<��$=�$%�N�

�� !�� !!��"��#$%�#$�$&��'!�� ' ��'��'��' ��'��'��'��'��(��)*+�,-./�0-1+)23456+��7��8��9��:��"�$�;��#$%��<��=��;�>��?�:!��@�!��A� :��"�A� ��"��A:��BC��D��E��"!�� !��"�� #$%�#$��:!�'��'�� "'��'�:��'C'!��'��'��'��!�(��F-3.GH6/+..3I+6J+2��7��8��9��:��"�$�;��#$%��K��>�� ;�>��:��"�$K;��#$%;�?��@��;�L�� M�:�� "�:��!�� !�� "�� !��'��C��'��!�NKO$K�'�� '��'��'"�:�'�� '��'"�:�'�!��'�' �!�� "(�D� �8�� 8��#$%#$$&��$�N$�� !��'��C��'��!�NKO$K�'�� '��'��'"�:�'�� '��'"�:�'�!��'�' �!�� "(�>��:��"�$&;��#$%;��E�"�� 7��8��>��:��"�$K;��#$%�&��;�?��P�Q��C;�D��>��:��"�$&;��#$%(��@A�A� ��"��B��:�� !��#$%�#$�$&�� '��'��!��"'��!��' ��R��!�(��=��D� �8�� 8��#$%#$$%#�<$�&�� !��#$%�#$�$&�� '��'��!��"'��!��' ��R��!�(�C��!��>��:��"�$%;��#$%��7��8��>��:��"�$%;�#$%��%��?��!��;�� N;��#$%(��?�:!��:��!��C��!��8��"�� !��#$%#N�N��:!�'��'��:��'��'!��'��'��'C��!'��8��(��O��@A� ��C��C��7:��!��?�:!�� !��"��#$%�#<�� '��'�� '�:��'��:!�'K#�KK$(��ST0H)HUT��7��8��"��;��#$%�N#��@�!��A� :��"�=��C�L� �� DC��A�"��7:��?�"��@��?�:!��"�!�� !��#$%�#<��:�� '�� '��:!�'�:��!�(��)*+�V+W�XY21�)3Z+[��"��;��#$%�BAA��#NK�'�NN$�� #NK�'�NN$(��7��8��"��;��#$%�N$��\A�]CC ��7:��\��A� ��8��D!�� C�� !��'��'A��'�� ']CC ��'�'\A'��'D!�'A� :��"'=�� '�%%$&N��$��!��_��:� �A� ��9��?��_�9EL��(��VaU�b�F-..-[cdY2/�eY2/*��7��8��>:�"�$<;��#$%�N��D��A�"��A��A��8�� 7:��E��D!��@��?�:!��"�!�� !��#$%�#&�$O�:�� C� �' �� ' ��'��'�:��'��C�� '�� !�(�7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�NN��]�!�;�E"��D��A� :��"�9��:!��:�� '�� :��"'C��:!' ��'��(��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�N��@A�� "��7:��!�� ;��:��?�:!�� !��"��#$%�#&�$O� ��'��'�:��'�� '!��'&NN$��(��ST0H)HUT��7��8��>:�"��;�#$%�N<��7��C:�� C��@�� C�� 8�R� �!��#$%�&�$K�$&<&KO<K�� '�:��'��:!�'�:��'�� '��' ��C�� (��fYg��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�NK��?�� ?�:!��D��h:��>��h��=��C�� #$%�#&�$K�K�O�K��#$�� '��'��:!�'��'�:��'��'�:��'��'��' ��C�� (��h7��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�N&��!��C��"�=��8��8�� ;� ��!��7:��"��?�:!�� !� ��'��' ��8��'�:��'��:!�'$#NN�<�(��V+W[W++1��>:�"�$O;�#$%��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�N%��]�=��;�i"��>:�"�$O;��#$%(��:��?�:!��B�C�!�:��L��A��=�!!��:CC�� !��"� ��'��'��'��' ��8��_:�_<�<# K& ��#C�< &N NNC&�(��j5kkSY[/��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�NO��A ��l;�7�C��@A�A� ��"��>:��@��!��C��B��8�� !� ��'��'� ��'��:!��' ��8��' �!!��'$%�&&��O%�(��,m.36/+2��7��8��>:�"��;��#$%�

�� !��"�#�$��!�� %�&"�#�$��'��(�)��*++��#�$��)��#+��+,��-��-��-��-��-�� -��-��-��#�$��-�� -��%+��./012345�671837154199�:1;9��<��=��>��%�>��?��$�@��A��>�� (��$�!�� -��$��#��$��%��>%��$��## ��%$�#��" �)��*++)))�B ��%�<+��+%�$$��+��%-��-%��$-)��A�-�� -��$-�� -�$��-��#��$-��%��CDED�F1837G014G�/H�IJ9GKL1��M�� N��>��%�>��?��$�O��)�@��A��>�� (��$�!�� -��$��#��$��%��>%��$��## ��%$�#��" �)��*++)))�B ��%�<+��+��+��%-��-%��$-#��)-)��A�-�� -��$-�� -�$��-��#��$��CDED�F1837G014G�/H�IJ9GKL1��M�� N��,��$��## ��P�<��O�� Q�!��>��$��R��!��@��S� �� M ��*++)))�B ��%�<+��+�+��-�$��## ��-��<��-#�� -��-��- �-��$��-��-��-��CDED�F1837G014G�/H�IJ9GKL1��M�� N��$��## ��%$�#��" �)��" �)��S��@��T�� O��%��%��@��S��$�S� ��*++)))�B ��%�<+��+�+��-�$��## ��-��%$�#��-� �)��-��-� �)��-��-)��T�� -#��%-��%��-��$��CDED�F1837G014G�/H�IJ9GKL1��M�� N��=�� #��P��?�)��<��S�#�$��!��U��*++)))�)��%��#+��$��+ #�-��-��-��-%�)�-�<�-��#�$�-��-�-��-��+��+�V+��+��W��-W,��-��-��=�-��VW��N��X��#$Y #X�#Z��V�V��N��[\1�]39\K4G/4�6/9G��M ��<��>��$�W��N��V��@��_�)��!��S�#�$��_��NNW��_��P�#��Y_��*++)))��#+��-��A+)��-$�)-��-��#�$��-��-�NNW��E4/819�a3LG�b\1Lc��<��>��$�W��N��W��((��$�d��(�)�P"!��$�� $��#�$�� %��%��$$�%�$$��*++)))��#+��+�=+�W+��$��+�$$�%�$-�##�%��-��-�� -��#�$��-��+��e��#$��((��<��M ��d��$��O��=��P"!��%��#�$��*++)))��#+��+�=+�=+��$��+��-��%-��#�$��-��-��$��-��%+��e��#$��((��<��M ��V��N��A��>$�e��M ��$ ��<�� #�_��$��$��#��#�$��*++ A�� #+ #�-��#��-��$��-��%-��$��-��-��-��-��-V��fJ9K4199�g49K517��<��M ��=��$$��U�$$��M ��_@��P��(��"�<��>�'�$��_��!��%�S�#�$��P"!�"��!��%�'�$��*++)))��%+��+�V+��+V��NW�=��+)�-��-��-��<�-�-��$��-��-��%-��#�$��-��-��-��$��-��('��<��M ��=��U$�A��>��M ��%�#��d��B��(��$��*++)))�)��%��#+��)�+��-��e+)�+��+�V+��+��-%�#-��-��-A��B��-��$��[\1�]39\K4G/4�6/9G��<��M ��=��TT��!�$<��M ��N��>��$��h�� #�_��$��%��#�$��*++)))�)��%��#+��)�+��-��A�+)�+��+�V+�N+��-��-�� - #��-��$��-��-��%-��#�$��-�-��-��+��[\1�]39\K4G/4�6/9G��R!!(��N�-��V��*++)))�)�$��%+��+��N�-��V��<��M ��N��=,��UU��(�)�� M ��*++��$�<�� A+#��$��+=+��+<��+��+#��+� ��-��#-��)�$��-$�)+��+��+<��+��V�%e��#�,�=��A�� i�>��)��(��$��M �� #��>�#��P��S�#�$�-!��'�$��*++)))�)�B��#+��$��+ #�-��#��-��-��#�$�-��-��$��-�=�N,��WN��[\1�]322�EG711G�I/J7432��R!!(��NN-NVV��*++)))�)�$��%+��+��NN-NVV��<��M ��

�� !"� #��$%��&�' ��(�� )��'�� ( ��(�(��*�&�$��((��+,,�� (��(��,�� ( ��,(��-&�' ��(-��-� � �-��-�)�-'�� -��( ��-�(-(��-*�&�,!"� ,".,� ,!�"�/ ��-/0"'-�� - "��-1*./"�2'�'�13�(��(��#��456�7895:;<=>;?>9=��@��A�"�2"- ! .��((��+,,��&��(��, ��,"�2"- ! .#��( �)�&��2�!"� ��.��B�)��C�� &��D��)��B� �� !"�2#��$E��*�&��&� ��&��&��(�A ��$��((��+,,��,!"�2,"1," ,�� ( ��,� �(F��-� ��-��(-&��-&��, �&�G��(��#��HAA��( �)�&�B� ��2�!"�2��/��I�� H��) ��&�H��$%�� J&��%��K�&�E ��L�� ( �� $��((��+,,��*��,��,�( ��,��-��-��-��- �� ( ��-)�(��-�� &-&��*(�-(��(-* ��-��-��,#��*��( �)�&��!��!"� �� H� ��H��$��( ��(��M��&��( ��'�� M��(�(��&�(�� ( �� &��' ��$��((��+,,(�� (��(��,!"� ,"2,!�,'�� -��( ��-*�&�-�� -C��-(��,#�456�N;=6OP6Q=��( �)�&�B� �� !"�2��2��((��+,,�� (��(��,�� ( ��,!"�2,"�,� ,��(�-��-'* -��F��- �)��( ��( ��-� �(F��-� ��-�)�-'�� -��( ��-�(�(��(�,."��((��+,,(�� ,��,��,10!2!0-��-&��(-��-� ��-�'-�� -��&�-��(�-(�-��.��((��+,,��(��&� ��*��(��,&��(�-��-(�-� ��-� �(F��-� ��-��-��F��-��( ��.!��((��+,,��'��(��,!"� ,".,� ��-��(� �-��-'�� -��( ��,.0��(��C��( ��R��** ��A�)��*��!.�!"� #��$S��T�&��(��S��%��D��(�� (�H��)��$��((��+,,��F��,�( ��,�-�-*�&�-��(��-��-(��-��-(�-& ��-� ��(-��)��-��10!112"!#��456�78UU�V=O66=�W>XO;8U��( �)�&��*��0"�!"� �.1��I �&��A�)��*��!.�!"� #��$E��(�(��S�-��G ��*�&��&��&�&� �(��(��&��$��((��+,,��)�G��,�� -��&-�� ( ��,!"� ,��,!.,� ��!1/1,(��-��-*�&�-��(��-��)��-��#�Y>Z��( �)�&��*��0"�!"� �.��B)�*�� K� ��*�(��A�)��*��!��!"� #��$� ��(�� % F��(��S��T�&��*�(�L��T�� L��'�%��D��$��((��+,,��( ��,!"� ,��,!�,��&,�� ,( F��-��G ��-*�&��(��#�456�[6\�]>O�4:_69��@��A�"0.!-100��((��+,,��&��(��, ��,"0.!-100�#��( �)�&��*��0"!"� �..�� D��&�(�� A�)��*��! �!"� #��$T�&��B��(��(�%��D�� (��G ��R��@(I��$��((��+,,��( ��,!"� ,��,! ,��&,�� ,(��-��-*�&��(��#��456�[6\�]>O�4:_69��( �)�&��*��0��!"� �./��$��(��(��'�E��&�� (�$��((��+,,��'��*��,��&�� (�,��(�,!!0"�2!/ "! ../2#��'��*��( �)�&��*��0"�!"� �. ��$��(��)��L��(+�H��)��$��((��+,,��&��),��,!"� ,��,"�,��(�-)�-'��(-��)��#��a6Q8O=_6;=�>bc>_6U8;d�V6PXO:=e��A�)��*��!"� ��( �)�&��*��0"�!"� �.2��D��A�)��*��2�!"� #��$%��%��&� � �(�( ��f��'�CC��(��f� � ��f� ��(��)��$��((��+,,�� (��(��,�� ( ��,!"� ,��,"2,(��-�&� � �(�( ��-'�CC�-��(�-� � ��-��)��#��4567895:;<=>;�?>9=��$%��R�� (��($��( �)�&��*��0"�!"� �/"��A G��*��1�!"� #��$� ��(�D �f��fE� ' ��%�� f��(��@��A�(�@(�� * � (��R� (�E��$��((��+,,��( ��,!"� ,�!,�1,��,�� ( ��,� ��(-� �-&��&-*�&�-��(��(��#��456�[6\]>O�4:_69��@��A�"0.!-100��((��+,,��&��(��, ��,"0.!-100�#��( �)�&��*��!2�!"� �/��H��&��B� � ��*��1�!"� #��$S��@�)��( ��( ��(��'�D��(��D �$��((��+,,��F��,�( ��, �� (-&��(�( ��- ��-�0-��11 "12.�#��456�78UU�V=O66=�W>XO;8U��$R��(��(��$��( �)�&��*��!2�!"� �

�� !�� "�# $

%&�'� ��()� ��*�� &+(&,-.��/0 1 ��#��0��"��0�*��# ��$��# �� 2� 1� �� /��&,-.�-&�&+��2��3��3�� 4567689:;<4=>6?�@$,A+&�BAA-�� ,A+&�BAA-��C�� *�� &D(&,-.�%A�E ��(*��*�� &+(&,-.��/�� F�)�� 2� )�� 2�� G��"�� *��/�� 2� �� 2�� --HBH.HHD-B��456IJKKLM;66MN:O;PJK�C�� *�� &D(&,-.�%B�/�� Q� ��)�$��#��2R��S�� T��U��"��/��&,-.�-&�&+�� V6WJ;M>6PM:XY:>6KJPZL6[O;=M\�*�� &+(&,-.�C�� *�� &D(&,-.�%H�/*��2�� 2&�� (� �� ]��2��/�� &,-.�-&�&+�� &B-A,H.,,&��L_4:ZJ\�C�� *�� &D(&,-.�%+�/�� "��C�� 2�� G ��1� �� /��&,-.�,H�-,�� 4567689:;<4=>6?�)��-,(&,-.�@$,A+&�BAA-�� ,A+&�BAA-��C�� )��-,(&,-.�%%�/$��0@��0�� 0/�� &,-.�,H�-H�� H.D+H&��abcd4deb�C�� )��&,(&,-.�%.�/�� 2$�� 7689:;<4=>6?/�� 2�� FQ1$-@1A+G��R�� C�� C�� )��&,(&,-.�%D� �� 3(# ��(��/*��G ��Q� ��$��/��&,-D�,B�,%�� ]��"$$�. � ��&,-D�. � ��&,-D�.,�/*�� Q� ��$�� 2�� G �� /�� ]��22� � ��&,-D�,B�,%��"1$�� %(&,-D�C�� .(&,-D�.-�U� ��('��f1��(��/g��2G �� $��h��/��&Ti*j�*��abcd4deb�C�� -,(&,-D�.&�'��(1� �f"��(��f"��()�� %(&,-D��/Q� ��$��(�� 2�� (��2��G �� /�� &,-D�,B�,%�� -.DH&.H,,&��L_4bV_9�C�� .(&,-D�.A�R��('��2� � � ��H(&,-D��/@�� U �� E� ��H,,"RT��1��G �� /�� &,-D�,B�,H�� 2� ��H,,�� 1�� C�� --(&,-D�.B�1��(k�� D(&,-D��/G�� Q� ��$��2 ��2��/��]��&,-D�B�D�-.A,,H.B�� j�]�C�� --(&,-D�.H�g��(*� �� %(&,-D��/�� Q� ��$��0� ��(�]��/��]��&,-D�B�%�-.&DDH.H�� j�]�C�� -B(&,-D�lmnopqrsstquv

�� !"#$%!"#& '(��)��*�+��+��,-�. /�0��1 23�45..67899�:;</=/6��/>;2 ?9<9/:��@;656A./.B�CD/ 7.E�:FG/�B7�:H2B�/�CI&I!!!!JK4L��M�,�N��OO�*��OPQRS��PTUVW�X�LYZ�[�@.�/7�>0>/B>�B��(:�� .5��\ �>./0��\2332:7�].. /�(./2:'5> �]B/=��_/��:7��>��/./2:>B�.� 37�3>��>66B�;�a�(7/:?�.5/7�7/.�b��2(�>? ��.2�.5��[� 37�21�c7��>:�� /0>��2B/��;�d/=/6��/>e�/7�>� �?/7.� ��. >��3> =�21�.5�d/=/3��/>�f2(:�>./2:b�g:�;b�>�:2:6 21/.�2 ?>:/h>./2:;




EXHIBIT 53

1

Press Releases Copied from DHS website https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/press-releases

April 12, 2019 DHS Announces Funding Opportunity for Fiscal Year 2019 Preparedness Grants

April 11, 2019 Acting Secretary McAleenan Statement on the Designation of Administrator Pekoske to Serve as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary

April 10, 2019 Message from Acting Secretary Kevin K. McAleenan

April 10, 2019 Farewell Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen

April 10, 2019 Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the Resignation of ICE Acting Director Ronald D. Vitiello

April 9, 2019 Message from Secretary Nielsen on Acting Deputy Secretary Grady

April 8, 2019 Readout from Acting Deputy Secretary Grady’s Trip to G-7 Interior Ministers’ Meeting

April 7, 2019 Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen

April 7, 2019 Secretary Nielsen, President Trump Assess Humanitarian and Security Emergency Response in Calexico

April 4, 2019 TSA Reminds Travelers of REAL ID Identification Requirements

April 3, 2019 Secretary Nielsen to Travel to Southern Border to Oversee Responses to Humanitarian and Security Emergency

April 2, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Convenes Border Crisis Meeting, Taps Manuel Padilla to Coordinate Interagency Border Emergency Cell

April 1, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Orders CBP to Surge More Personnel to Southern Border, Increase Number of Aliens Returned to Mexico

April 1, 2019 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen in Europe for Bilateral Security Meetings, Representing U.S. at Gathering of G7 Interior Ministers

March 29, 2019 Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen Statement on Border Emergency

March 28, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Signs Historic Regional Compact with Central America to Stem Irregular Migration at the Source, Confront U.S. Border Crisis

March 27, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on Executive Order to Protect the U.S. from Electromagnetic Pulse Attacks

March 26, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Meets with Mexican Officials on Border Emergency, Travels to Honduras to Meet with Northern Triangle Governments to Address Crisis at Source

March 21, 2019 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to Texas

March 18, 2019 President’s Fiscal Year 2020 Budget

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/12/dhs-announces-funding-opportunity-fiscal-year-2019-preparedness-grants

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/11/acting-secretary-mcaleenan-statement-designation-administrator-pekoske-serve-senior

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/11/acting-secretary-mcaleenan-statement-designation-administrator-pekoske-serve-senior

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/10/message-acting-secretary-kevin-k-mcaleenan

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/10/farewell-message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/10/message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-resignation-ice-acting-director-ronald-d

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/10/message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-resignation-ice-acting-director-ronald-d

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/09/message-secretary-nielsen-acting-deputy-secretary-grady

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/08/readout-acting-deputy-secretary-grady-s-trip-g-7-interior-ministers-meeting

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/07/message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/07/secretary-nielsen-president-trump-assess-humanitarian-and-security-emergency

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/07/secretary-nielsen-president-trump-assess-humanitarian-and-security-emergency

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/04/tsa-reminds-travelers-real-id-identification-requirements

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/03/secretary-nielsen-travel-southern-border-oversee-responses-humanitarian-and-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/03/secretary-nielsen-travel-southern-border-oversee-responses-humanitarian-and-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/02/secretary-nielsen-convenes-border-crisis-meeting-taps-manuel-padilla-coordinate

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/02/secretary-nielsen-convenes-border-crisis-meeting-taps-manuel-padilla-coordinate

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/01/secretary-nielsen-orders-cbp-surge-more-personnel-southern-border-increase-number

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/01/secretary-nielsen-orders-cbp-surge-more-personnel-southern-border-increase-number

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/01/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-europe-bilateral-security-meetings-representing-us

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/04/01/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-europe-bilateral-security-meetings-representing-us

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/29/secretary-kirstjen-nielsen-statement-border-emergency

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/28/secretary-nielsen-signs-historic-regional-compact-central-america-stem-irregular

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/28/secretary-nielsen-signs-historic-regional-compact-central-america-stem-irregular

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/27/secretary-nielsen-statement-executive-order-protect-us-electromagnetic-pulse-attacks

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/27/secretary-nielsen-statement-executive-order-protect-us-electromagnetic-pulse-attacks

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/26/secretary-nielsen-meets-mexican-officials-border-emergency-travels-honduras-meet

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/26/secretary-nielsen-meets-mexican-officials-border-emergency-travels-honduras-meet

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/21/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-texas

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/18/president-s-fiscal-year-2020-budget

2

March 18, 2019 A New DHS for a New Age

March 15, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on New Zealand Mosque Shootings

March 14, 2019 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to the Advanced Training Center with Vice President Mike Pence

March 8, 2019 Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for South Sudan

March 6, 2019 Humanitarian and Security Crisis at Southern Border Reaches 'Breaking Point'

February 27, 2019 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Trip Readout from Napa and San Francisco, CA

February 22, 2019 Joint Statement Outlines Clear Path Toward Historic Northern Triangle Compact

February 21, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Announces Historic Steps with Northern Triangle Security Ministers to Confront Irregular Migration, Caravans

February 15, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on FY19 Homeland Security Funding Bill and National Emergency Declaration

February 15, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on the Nomination of Chad Wolf

February 14, 2019 RAND Releases Report Commissioned by DHS on Building an Effective and Practical National Approach to Terrorism Prevention

February 13, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on Administrator Long

February 8, 2019 DHS Issues Waiver to Expedite Secondary Fence Replacement Project in San Diego

February 7, 2019 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip with Vice President Mike Pence

February 5, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on the State of the Union

February 5, 2019 Secretary Nielsen Statement on New Migrant 'Caravan'

February 5, 2019 Acting Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security Submit Joint Report on Impact of Foreign Interference on Election and Political/Campaign Infrastructure in 2018 Elections

February 1, 2019 DHS Combats Human Trafficking And Seizes Counterfeit Merchandise During the Super Bowl

January 31, 2019 DHS Announces Implementation of Visa Sanctions on Ghana

January 31, 2019 DHS Secures Super Bowl 53

January 29, 2019 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to San Diego

January 24, 2019 Migrant Protection Protocols

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/18/new-dhs-new-age

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/15/secretary-nielsen-statement-new-zealand-mosque-shootings

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/14/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-advanced-training-center-vice-president-mike-pence

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/14/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-advanced-training-center-vice-president-mike-pence

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/08/secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-m-nielsen-announcement-temporary-protected


https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/03/06/humanitarian-and-security-crisis-southern-border-reaches-breaking-point

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/27/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-trip-readout-napa-and-san-francisco-ca

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/22/joint-statement-outlines-clear-path-toward-historic-northern-triangle-compact

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/21/secretary-nielsen-announces-historic-steps-northern-triangle-security-ministers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/21/secretary-nielsen-announces-historic-steps-northern-triangle-security-ministers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/15/secretary-nielsen-statement-fy19-homeland-security-funding-bill-and-national

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/15/secretary-nielsen-statement-fy19-homeland-security-funding-bill-and-national

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/15/secretary-nielsen-statement-nomination-chad-wolf

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/14/rand-releases-report-commissioned-dhs-building-effective-and-practical-national

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/14/rand-releases-report-commissioned-dhs-building-effective-and-practical-national

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/13/secretary-nielsen-statement-administrator-long

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/08/dhs-issues-waiver-expedite-secondary-fence-replacement-project-san-diego

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/07/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-vice-president-mike-pence

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/05/secretary-nielsen-statement-state-union

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/05/secretary-nielsen-statement-new-migrant-caravan

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2019/02/05/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report



https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/01/dhs-combats-human-trafficking-and-seizes-counterfeit-merchandise-during-super-bowl

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/01/dhs-combats-human-trafficking-and-seizes-counterfeit-merchandise-during-super-bowl

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/31/dhs-announces-implementation-visa-sanctions-ghana

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/31/dhs-secures-super-bowl-53

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/29/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-san-diego

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/24/migrant-protection-protocols

3

January 24, 2019 CBP Releases Apprehension Data

January 9, 2019 DHS Releases Southwest Border Enforcement Statistics

January 7, 2019 MYTH/FACT: Known and Suspected Terrorists/Special Interest Aliens

January 1, 2019 CBP Issues Statement on Illegal Border Crossings in San Diego Sector

December 31, 2018 CBP Commissioner: Continued Humanitarian Crisis - Increase in Medical Emergencies on the Southern Border

December 26, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on Passing of Eight Year Old Guatemalan Child

December 26, 2018 Department of Homeland Security Issues Travel Advisory to the Republic of the Philippines

December 25, 2018 CBP Shares Additional Information about Recent Passing of Guatemalan Child

December 25, 2018 Guatemalan national passes away at Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center in Alamogordo, New Mexico

December 20, 2018 Joint Statement by Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen

December 20, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Announces Historic Action to Confront Illegal Immigration

December 18, 2018 Senate Votes to Authorize the DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office

December 18, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on the Federal Commission on School Safety Comprehensive Resource Guide

December 13, 2018 Readout of Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to Jordan and Egypt

December 12, 2018 DHS Blue Lightning Initiative Hosts Stakeholder Summit

December 12, 2018 Walls Work

December 7, 2018 DHS Blue Campaign Announces Partnership with United Airlines

December 3, 2018 Statement on Secretary Nielsen's Meeting with Mexican Foreign Secretary-Designate Marcelo Ebrard

November 25, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement On San Ysidro Port Of Entry Closure

November 13, 2018 Congress Passes Legislation Standing Up Cybersecurity Agency in DHS

November 9, 2018 Joint EU-U.S. statement following the EU-U.S. Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting

November 8, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on the Shooting in California

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/24/cbp-releases-apprehension-data

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/09/dhs-releases-southwest-border-enforcement-statistics

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/07/mythfact-known-and-suspected-terroristsspecial-interest-aliens

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/01/cbp-issues-statement-illegal-border-crossings-san-diego-sector

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/31/cbp-commissioner-continued-humanitarian-crisis-increase-medical-emergencies-southern

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/31/cbp-commissioner-continued-humanitarian-crisis-increase-medical-emergencies-southern

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/26/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-passing-eight-year-old-guatemalan-child

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/26/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-passing-eight-year-old-guatemalan-child

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/26/department-homeland-security-issues-travel-advisory-republic-philippines

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/26/department-homeland-security-issues-travel-advisory-republic-philippines

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/25/cbp-shares-additional-information-about-recent-passing-guatemalan-child

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/25/guatemalan-national-passes-away-gerald-champion-regional-medical-center-alamogordo

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/25/guatemalan-national-passes-away-gerald-champion-regional-medical-center-alamogordo

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/12/20/joint-statement-secretary-state-michael-r-pompeo-and-secretary-homeland

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/12/20/joint-statement-secretary-state-michael-r-pompeo-and-secretary-homeland

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/20/secretary-nielsen-announces-historic-action-confront-illegal-immigration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/18/senate-votes-authorize-dhs-countering-weapons-mass-destruction-office

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/12/18/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-federal-commission-school-safety

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/12/18/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-federal-commission-school-safety

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/13/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-jordan-and-egypt

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/12/dhs-blue-lightning-initiative-hosts-stakeholder-summit

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/12/walls-work

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/07/dhs-blue-campaign-announces-partnership-united-airlines

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/03/statement-secretary-nielsens-meeting-mexican-foreign-secretary-designate-marcelo

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/03/statement-secretary-nielsens-meeting-mexican-foreign-secretary-designate-marcelo

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/25/secretary-nielsen-statement-san-ysidro-port-entry-closure

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/11/13/congress-passes-legislation-standing-cybersecurity-agency-dhs

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/09/joint-eu-us-statement-following-eu-us-justice-and-home-affairs-ministerial-meeting


https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/08/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-shooting-california

4

November 8, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker Statement

November 8, 2018 Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the 2018 Secretary’s Awards

November 7, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on National Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Month

November 7, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on the Nomination of Dr. Joseph Cuffari

November 5, 2018 Joint Statement on Election Day Preparations

October 26, 2018 Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense

October 25, 2018 Statement From DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on Recent Mail Bombs

October 15, 2018 FEMA Leads Massive Whole Community Response Effort for Hurricane Michael Survivors

October 12, 2018 Department of Homeland Security Hosts Central American Countries for Security Day

October 12, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on the Confirmation of Pete Gaynor

October 11, 2018 DHS Issues Waiver to Expedite Border Construction Project in Hidalgo County, Texas

October 10, 2018 DHS Issues Waiver to Expedite Border Wall Gate Construction Project in Texas

October 9, 2018 DHS Announces Strategy to Protect the Homeland from Electromagnetic Incidents

October 6, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on Recent Media Reports of Potential Supply Chain Compromise

October 5, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on President Trump’s Counterterrorism Strategy

October 4, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on Passage of Legislation to Counter Dangerous Unmanned Aerial Systems

October 3, 2018 DHS and DOE Meet with Oil and Natural Gas Sector Coordinating Council, Announce Pipeline Cybersecurity Initiative

October 3, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Kicks Off National Cybersecurity Awareness Month

October 2, 2018 Nationwide Emergency Alert Test Planned for Oct. 3

September 25, 2018 Department of Homeland Security Launches First National “If You See Something, Say Something®” Awareness Day Today

September 22, 2018 DHS Announces New Proposed Immigration Rule to Enforce Long-Standing Law that Promotes Self-Sufficiency and Protects American Taxpayers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/08/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-acting-attorney-general-matthew-g-whitaker-statement

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/08/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-acting-attorney-general-matthew-g-whitaker-statement

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/08/message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-2018-secretary-s-awards

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/11/07/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-national-critical-infrastructure

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/11/07/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-national-critical-infrastructure

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/11/07/secretary-nielsen-statement-nomination-dr-joseph-cuffari

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/11/05/joint-statement-election-day-preparations

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/26/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-department-defense

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/25/statement-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-recent-mail-bombs

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/15/fema-leads-massive-whole-community-response-effort-hurricane-michael-survivors

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/15/fema-leads-massive-whole-community-response-effort-hurricane-michael-survivors

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/12/department-homeland-security-hosts-central-american-countries-security-day

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/12/secretary-nielsen-statement-confirmation-pete-gaynor

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/11/dhs-issues-waiver-expedite-border-construction-project-hidalgo-county-texas

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/10/dhs-issues-waiver-expedite-border-wall-gate-construction-project-texas

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/09/dhs-announces-strategy-protect-homeland-electromagnetic-incidents

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/06/statement-dhs-press-secretary-recent-media-reports-potential-supply-chain-compromise

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/06/statement-dhs-press-secretary-recent-media-reports-potential-supply-chain-compromise

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/05/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-counterterrorism-strategy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/05/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-counterterrorism-strategy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/04/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-passage-legislation-counter-dangerous

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/04/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-passage-legislation-counter-dangerous

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/03/dhs-and-doe-meet-oil-and-natural-gas-sector-coordinating-council-announce-pipeline

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/03/dhs-and-doe-meet-oil-and-natural-gas-sector-coordinating-council-announce-pipeline

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/10/03/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-kicks-national-cybersecurity-awareness-month

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/10/02/nationwide-emergency-alert-test-planned-oct-3

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/25/department-homeland-security-launches-first-national-if-you-see-something-say

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/25/department-homeland-security-launches-first-national-if-you-see-something-say

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/22/dhs-announces-new-proposed-immigration-rule-enforce-long-standing-law-promotes-self

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/22/dhs-announces-new-proposed-immigration-rule-enforce-long-standing-law-promotes-self

5

September 20, 2018 Statement by Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the Release of the National Cyber Strategy

September 18, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Swears in New Homeland Security Advisory Council Members

September 18, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on President Trump’s National Biodefense Strategy

September 17, 2018 Nationwide Test of the Emergency Alerting Systems

September 16, 2018 Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems During Hurricane Florence Response and Recovery Operations

September 14, 2018 DHS Reissues the NTAS Bulletin

September 14, 2018 DHS Statement Regarding Safety and Enforcement During Hurricane Florence

September 13, 2018 House of Representatives Votes to Authorize the DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office

September 13, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on President Trump’s Election Security Executive Order

September 12, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on August Border Numbers

September 12, 2018 FEMA and Partners Urge Preparedness for Dangerous Storms

September 11, 2018 Message from Secretary Nielsen on the Anniversary of the September 11th Attacks

August 30, 2018 Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on National Preparedness Month

August 30, 2018 Readout from Secretary Nielsen's Trip to Australia for the Five Country Ministerial

August 24, 2018 DHS, FBI Hold Joint Briefing for Election Officials with Facebook and Microsoft

August 24, 2018 DHS Announces Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2018 Preparedness Grants

August 24, 2018 Secretary Nielsen to Travel to Australia for the Five Country Ministerial

August 24, 2018 President Trump Signs Emergency Declaration for Hawaii

August 20, 2018 The Life Saving Missions of CBP

August 20, 2018 The Life Saving Missions of ICE

August 16, 2018 Readout of Federal Commission on School Safety Event Hosted by DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen

August 15, 2018 DHS Hosts National Exercise on Election Security

August 15, 2018 DHS to Host Federal Commission on School Safety Meeting with Focus on Enhancing School Security Measures

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/20/statement-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-release-national-cyber-strategy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/20/statement-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-release-national-cyber-strategy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/18/secretary-nielsen-swears-new-homeland-security-advisory-council-members

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/18/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-national-biodefense

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/18/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-national-biodefense

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/17/nationwide-test-emergency-alerting-systems

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/16/use-unmanned-aircraft-systems-during-hurricane-florence-response-and-recovery

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/16/use-unmanned-aircraft-systems-during-hurricane-florence-response-and-recovery

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/14/dhs-reissues-ntas-bulletin

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/14/dhs-statement-regarding-safety-and-enforcement-during-hurricane-florence

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/13/house-representatives-votes-authorize-dhs-countering-weapons-mass-destruction-office

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/13/house-representatives-votes-authorize-dhs-countering-weapons-mass-destruction-office

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/13/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-election-security-executive-order

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/13/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-election-security-executive-order

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/12/statement-dhs-press-secretary-august-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/12/fema-and-partners-urge-preparedness-dangerous-storms

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/09/11/message-secretary-nielsen-anniversary-september-11th-attacks

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/30/message-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-national-preparedness-month

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/30/readout-secretary-nielsens-trip-australia-five-country-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/24/dhs-fbi-hold-joint-briefing-election-officials-facebook-and-microsoft

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/24/dhs-announces-grant-allocations-fiscal-year-2018-preparedness-grants

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/24/secretary-nielsen-travel-australia-five-country-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/24/president-trump-signs-emergency-declaration-hawaii

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/20/life-saving-missions-cbp

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/20/life-saving-missions-ice

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/16/readout-federal-commission-school-safety-event-hosted-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/16/readout-federal-commission-school-safety-event-hosted-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/15/dhs-hosts-national-exercise-election-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/15/dhs-host-federal-commission-school-safety-meeting-focus-enhancing-school-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/15/dhs-host-federal-commission-school-safety-meeting-focus-enhancing-school-security

6

August 13, 2018 Vice President Pence: Time Has Come for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

August 10, 2018 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to California

August 8, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on July Border Numbers

August 7, 2018 DHS Releases Fiscal Year 2017 Entry/Exit Overstay Report

August 6, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on President Trump’s Intent to Nominate Ronald D. Vitiello to Serve as the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

August 6, 2018 DHS and Facebook Update Election Officials on Foreign Interference Operations

August 3, 2018 Readout from Secretary Nielsen’s Trip to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands

August 1, 2018 DHS Hosts Successful First-Ever National Cybersecurity Summit

July 30, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Meets with Mexican Secretary of Governance Alfonso Navarrete Prida

July 26, 2018 Department of Homeland Security Announces National Cybersecurity Summit Participants

July 23, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Meets with Border Sheriffs to Discuss Border Security, Continued Partnerships

July 19, 2018 The Perils of Illegal Border Crossing

July 19, 2018 Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for Somalia

July 18, 2018 Department of Homeland Security to Host National Cybersecurity Summit

July 13, 2018 Readout from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Trip to Mexico

July 13, 2018 U.S. Secret Service Releases Operational Guide for Preventing Targeted School Violence

July 12, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on FEMA 2017 Hurricane Season After-Action Report

July 12, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Travel to Mexico

July 12, 2018 Trump Administration Completes Reunification for Eligible Children Under Age 5

July 11, 2018 Readout from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Meetings in Guatemala

July 10, 2018 The Administration is Following the Court Order to Reunify Families in a Responsible Manner

July 10, 2018 DHS Announces Implementation of Visa Sanctions

July 5, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on June Border Numbers

July 5, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for Yemen

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/08/13/vice-president-pence-time-has-come-cybersecurity-and-infrastructure-security

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/08/13/vice-president-pence-time-has-come-cybersecurity-and-infrastructure-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/10/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-california

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/08/statement-dhs-press-secretary-july-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/07/dhs-releases-fiscal-year-2017-entryexit-overstay-report

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/06/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-intent-nominate-ronald-d-vitiello

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/06/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trump-s-intent-nominate-ronald-d-vitiello

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/06/dhs-and-facebook-update-election-officials-foreign-interference-operations

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/03/readout-secretary-nielsen-s-trip-puerto-rico-and-us-virgin-islands

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/08/01/dhs-hosts-successful-first-ever-national-cybersecurity-summit

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/30/secretary-nielsen-meets-mexican-secretary-governance-alfonso-navarrete-prida

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/26/department-homeland-security-announces-national-cybersecurity-summit-participants

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/23/secretary-nielsen-meets-border-sheriffs-discuss-border-security-continued

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/23/secretary-nielsen-meets-border-sheriffs-discuss-border-security-continued

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/19/perils-illegal-border-crossing



https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/18/department-homeland-security-host-national-cybersecurity-summit

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/13/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-trip-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/13/us-secret-service-releases-operational-guide-preventing-targeted-school-violence

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/12/secretary-nielsen-statement-fema-2017-hurricane-season-after-action-report

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/12/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-travel-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/12/trump-administration-completes-reunification-eligible-children-under-age-5

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/11/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-meetings-guatemala

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/10/administration-following-court-order-reunify-families-responsible-manner

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/10/administration-following-court-order-reunify-families-responsible-manner

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/10/dhs-announces-implementation-visa-sanctions

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/05/statement-dhs-press-secretary-june-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/07/05/secretary-nielsen-announcement-temporary-protected-status-yemen

7

June 30, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Announces Ronald D. Vitiello to Serve as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

June 26, 2018 DHS Statement on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry to the United States

June 23, 2018 Fact Sheet: Zero-Tolerance Prosecution and Family Reunification

June 19, 2018 DHS Officials Discuss Efforts to Combat the Opioid Crisis

June 18, 2018 DHS Secretary Nielsen's Remarks on the Illegal Immigration Crisis

June 18, 2018 Myth vs. Fact: DHS Zero-Tolerance Policy

June 15, 2018 Fact Sheet: Zero Tolerance Immigration Prosecutions - Families

June 13, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

June 12, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Receives Operational Briefing on Israeli Security Technology, Delivers Remarks at the International Homeland Security Forum

June 12, 2018 DHS Announces Strengthened Northern Border Strategy

June 8, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Travel to Israel

June 7, 2018 DHS Receives "A+" Grade on the SBA Annual Small Business Procurement Scorecard

June 7, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Meets with Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández

June 7, 2018 Departments of Justice and Homeland Security Release Quarterly Alien Incarceration Report Highlighting the Negative Effects Of Illegal Immigration and the Need for Border Security

June 6, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on May Border Numbers

June 4, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Meets with Canadian Minister Ahmed Hussen

May 31, 2018 DHS Announces Additional Visas for Foreign Workers to Assist American Businesses at Risk of Failing

May 30, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on Executive Order 13800

May 30, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Visits National Hurricane Center in Miami

May 29, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Meets with UK Home Secretary Javid

May 23, 2018 Joint EU-U.S. statement following the EU-U.S. Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting

May 22, 2018 Joint Statement from DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats

May 21, 2018 DHS Announces Funding Opportunity for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Preparedness Grants

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/30/secretary-nielsen-announces-ronald-d-vitiello-serve-acting-director-us-immigration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/30/secretary-nielsen-announces-ronald-d-vitiello-serve-acting-director-us-immigration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/26/dhs-statement-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/23/fact-sheet-zero-tolerance-prosecution-and-family-reunification

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/19/dhs-officials-discuss-efforts-combat-opioid-crisis

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/18/dhs-secretary-nielsens-remarks-illegal-immigration-crisis

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/18/myth-vs-fact-dhs-zero-tolerance-policy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/15/fact-sheet-zero-tolerance-immigration-prosecutions-families

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/13/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meets-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/12/secretary-nielsen-receives-operational-briefing-israeli-security-technology-delivers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/12/secretary-nielsen-receives-operational-briefing-israeli-security-technology-delivers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/12/dhs-announces-strengthened-northern-border-strategy

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/08/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-travel-israel

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/07/dhs-receives-grade-sba-annual-small-business-procurement-scorecard

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/07/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meets-honduran-president-juan-orlando-hern-ndez

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/07/departments-justice-and-homeland-security-release-quarterly-alien-incarceration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/07/departments-justice-and-homeland-security-release-quarterly-alien-incarceration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/06/statement-dhs-press-secretary-may-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/06/04/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meets-canadian-minister-ahmed-hussen

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/31/dhs-announces-additional-visas-foreign-workers-assist-american-businesses-risk

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/31/dhs-announces-additional-visas-foreign-workers-assist-american-businesses-risk

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/30/secretary-nielsen-statement-executive-order-13800

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/30/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-visits-national-hurricane-center-miami

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/29/secretary-nielsen-meets-uk-home-secretary-javid



https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/22/joint-statement-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-fbi-director-christopher-wray-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/22/joint-statement-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-fbi-director-christopher-wray-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/21/dhs-announces-funding-opportunity-fiscal-year-fy-2018-preparedness-grants-0

8

May 21, 2018 Acting Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Claire Grady to Travel to the U.S.- EU Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial

May 18, 2018 Readout of Meetings Between DHS, DOS, and Mexican Officials

May 18, 2018 DHS Honors Fallen Law Enforcement Officers During Police Week

May 15, 2018 Department of Homeland Security Unveils Strategy to Guide Cybersecurity Efforts

May 9, 2018 DHS Reissues the NTAS Bulletin

May 4, 2018 Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for Honduras

May 4, 2018 Statement from DHS Press Secretary on April Border Numbers

May 1, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Leads Hurricane Preparedness Exercise

April 26, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for Nepal

April 25, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on Arrival of Central American ‘Caravan’

April 24, 2018 Readout of Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Day Two Meetings at the G7 Security Ministerial

April 23, 2018 Readout of Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Day One Meetings at the G7 Security Ministerial

April 23, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on Central American 'Caravan'

April 20, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Travel to G7 Security Ministerial

April 19, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Joins President Trump at JIATF-South to Discuss Efforts to Stop Drugs and Criminals from Entering Our Country

April 17, 2018 DHS Press Secretary Statement on Sessions v. Dimaya

April 12, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Speak at RSA Conference

April 10, 2018 Chad has Met Baseline Security Requirements, Travel Restrictions to be Removed

April 10, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on Thomas P. Bossert

April 9, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Travel to New Mexico

April 6, 2018 Joint Statement by Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and Secretary of Defense James Mattis

April 5, 2018 Statement from the Press Secretary on March Border Numbers

April 4, 2018 To Secure the Border and Make America Safe Again, We Need to Deploy the National Guard

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/21/acting-deputy-secretary-homeland-security-claire-grady-travel-us-eu-justice-and-home

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/21/acting-deputy-secretary-homeland-security-claire-grady-travel-us-eu-justice-and-home

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/18/readout-meetings-between-dhs-dos-and-mexican-officials-0

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/18/dhs-honors-fallen-law-enforcement-officers-during-police-week

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/15/department-homeland-security-unveils-strategy-guide-cybersecurity-efforts

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/09/dhs-reissues-ntas-bulletin



https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/04/statement-dhs-press-secretary-april-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/05/01/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-leads-hurricane-preparedness-exercise

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/26/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-announcement-temporary-protected-status-nepal

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/25/secretary-nielsen-statement-arrival-central-american-caravan

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/24/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-day-two-meetings-g7-security-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/24/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-day-two-meetings-g7-security-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/23/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-day-one-meetings-g7-security-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/23/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-day-one-meetings-g7-security-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/23/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-central-american-caravan

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/20/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-travel-g7-security-ministerial

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/19/secretary-nielsen-joins-president-trump-jiatf-south-discuss-efforts-stop-drugs-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/19/secretary-nielsen-joins-president-trump-jiatf-south-discuss-efforts-stop-drugs-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/17/dhs-press-secretary-statement-sessions-v-dimaya

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/12/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-speak-rsa-conference

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/10/chad-has-met-baseline-security-requirements-travel-restrictions-be-removed

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/10/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-thomas-p-bossert

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/09/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-travel-new-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/06/joint-statement-secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-nielsen-and-secretary-defense

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/06/joint-statement-secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-nielsen-and-secretary-defense

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/05/statement-press-secretary-march-border-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/04/secure-border-and-make-america-safe-again-we-need-deploy-national-guard

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/04/04/secure-border-and-make-america-safe-again-we-need-deploy-national-guard

9

March 27, 2018 Readout of Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto

March 27, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Enters Agreements With Mexican Officials To Strengthen U.S.-Mexico Relationship

March 25, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen to Travel to Mexico

March 22, 2018 Readout of Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen’s Meeting with EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator Gilles de Kerchove

March 22, 2018 Statement from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the Confirmation of CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan

March 13, 2018 DHS Statement on President Trump Visit to Border Wall Prototypes

March 12, 2018 DHS Working To Enhance School Safety, Increase Preparedness

March 8, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on President Trump's Nomination of Vice Admiral Karl L. Schultz to be the Next Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard

March 7, 2018 Acting Press Secretary Tyler Q. Houlton Statement on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals

March 1, 2018 Statement by Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen on Aviation Security

March 1, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Marks 15 Years of DHS Protecting the Homeland

February 27, 2018 DHS Acting Press Secretary Statement on Border Wall Ruling

February 23, 2018 Secretary Nielsen Statement on the Retirement of Deputy Secretary Duke

February 23, 2018 DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Meets With The Council Of Governors

February 22, 2018 Readout Of DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Meeting With Australian Prime Minster Malcolm Turnbull And NSA Director Mike Rogers On Cybersecurity

February 20, 2018 Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on Cybersecurity for the Nation’s Election

February 19, 2018 Readout of DHS Meetings with State Election Officials and Other Election Sector Partners

February 16, 2018 DHS Secretary Nielsen Joins Vice President Pence Along the Southern Border

February 16, 2018 Readout of Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen's Meeting with Guatemalan Minister of Government Enrique Degenhart

February 15, 2018 ODNI, DHS, FBI To Lead National-level Classified Dialogue for State Election Officials

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/27/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-meeting-mexican-president-enrique-pe-nieto

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/27/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-meeting-mexican-president-enrique-pe-nieto

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/27/secretary-nielsen-enters-agreements-mexican-officials-strengthen-us-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/27/secretary-nielsen-enters-agreements-mexican-officials-strengthen-us-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/25/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-travel-mexico

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/22/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-meeting-eu-counter-terrorism-coordinator

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/22/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-s-meeting-eu-counter-terrorism-coordinator

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/22/statement-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-confirmation-cbp-commissioner-kevin-mcaleenan

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/22/statement-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-confirmation-cbp-commissioner-kevin-mcaleenan

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/13/dhs-statement-president-trump-visit-border-wall-prototypes

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news/2018/03/12/dhs-working-enhance-school-safety-increase-preparedness

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/08/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trumps-nomination-vice-admiral-karl-l-schultz

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/08/secretary-nielsen-statement-president-trumps-nomination-vice-admiral-karl-l-schultz

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/07/acting-press-secretary-tyler-q-houlton-statement-deferred-action-childhood-arrivals

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/07/acting-press-secretary-tyler-q-houlton-statement-deferred-action-childhood-arrivals

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/01/statement-secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-m-nielsen-aviation-security

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/03/01/secretary-nielsen-marks-15-years-dhs-protecting-homeland

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/27/dhs-acting-press-secretary-statement-border-wall-ruling

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/23/secretary-nielsen-statement-retirement-deputy-secretary-duke

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/23/dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meets-council-governors

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/22/readout-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meeting-australian-prime-minster-malcolm

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/22/readout-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-meeting-australian-prime-minster-malcolm

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/20/secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-cybersecurity-nation-s

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/20/secretary-homeland-security-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-cybersecurity-nation-s

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/19/readout-dhs-meetings-state-election-officials-and-other-election-sector-partners

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/19/readout-dhs-meetings-state-election-officials-and-other-election-sector-partners

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/16/dhs-secretary-nielsen-joins-vice-president-pence-along-southern-border

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/16/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsens-meeting-guatemalan-minister-government-enrique

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/16/readout-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsens-meeting-guatemalan-minister-government-enrique

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/odni-dhs-fbi-lead-national-level-classified-dialogue-state-election-officials

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/odni-dhs-fbi-lead-national-level-classified-dialogue-state-election-officials

10

February 15, 2018 Unaccompanied Alien Children and Family Units Are Flooding the Border Because of Catch and Release Loopholes

February 15, 2018 To Make America Safe Again, We Must End Sanctuary Cities and Remove Criminal Aliens

February 15, 2018 We Need to End Unchecked Chain Migration and Eliminate the Reckless Visa Lottery to Secure the Nation and Protect the American Worker

February 15, 2018 We Must Secure The Border And Build The Wall To Make America Safe Again

February 15, 2018 Schumer-Rounds-Collins Destroys Ability of DHS to Enforce Immigration Laws, Creating a Mass Amnesty For Over 10 Million Illegal Aliens, Including Criminals

February 14, 2018 The McCain-Coons Proposal Would Increase Illegal Immigration, Surge Chain Migration, Continue Catch and Release, and Give a Pathway to Citizenship to Convicted Alien Felons

February 14, 2018 The Secure and Succeed Act Secures the Border, Ends Chain Migration, Cancels the Visa Lottery and Finds a Permanent Solution for DACA

February 12, 2018 Department Of Homeland Security Statement On The President’s Fiscal Year 2019 Budget

February 12, 2018 DHS Statement On NBC News Coverage Of Election Hacking

February 7, 2018 DHS Acting Press Secretary Statement on January Border Apprehension Numbers

February 6, 2018 Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Statement on the National Vetting Center

February 5, 2018 DHS Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Discusses Raising Global Security Standards with Minister Of Public Safety Canada Ralph Goodale

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/unaccompanied-alien-children-and-family-units-are-flooding-border-because-catch-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/unaccompanied-alien-children-and-family-units-are-flooding-border-because-catch-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/make-america-safe-again-we-must-end-sanctuary-cities-and-remove-criminal-aliens

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/make-america-safe-again-we-must-end-sanctuary-cities-and-remove-criminal-aliens

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/we-need-end-unchecked-chain-migration-and-eliminate-reckless-visa-lottery-secure

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/we-need-end-unchecked-chain-migration-and-eliminate-reckless-visa-lottery-secure

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/we-must-secure-border-and-build-wall-make-america-safe-again

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/schumer-rounds-collins-destroys-ability-dhs-enforce-immigration-laws-creating-mass

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/schumer-rounds-collins-destroys-ability-dhs-enforce-immigration-laws-creating-mass

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/14/mccain-coons-proposal-would-increase-illegal-immigration-surge-chain-migration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/14/mccain-coons-proposal-would-increase-illegal-immigration-surge-chain-migration

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/14/secure-and-succeed-act-secures-border-ends-chain-migration-cancels-visa-lottery-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/14/secure-and-succeed-act-secures-border-ends-chain-migration-cancels-visa-lottery-and

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/12/department-homeland-security-statement-president-s-fiscal-year-2019-budget

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/12/department-homeland-security-statement-president-s-fiscal-year-2019-budget

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/12/dhs-statement-nbc-news-coverage-election-hacking

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/07/dhs-acting-press-secretary-statement-january-border-apprehension-numbers

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/06/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-statement-national-vetting-center

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/05/dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-discusses-raising-global-security-standards

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/05/dhs-secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-discusses-raising-global-security-standards




EXHIBIT 54

Farewell Message fromSecretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen

Release Date: Release Date: April 10, 2019

As you know, I submitted my resignation to the President earlier this week. Today is

my final day at the Department. For nearly two years, I’ve had the honor to work

alongside a talented, dedicated workforce. You serve with professionalism, respect,

and determination in fulfilling DHS’ important missions. The commitment you make

day in and out – securing the land air and sea domains, preventing terrorism,

administrating immigration laws, ensuring disaster resilience, safeguarding our

cybersecurity landscape and infrastructure, and so much more – is awe inspiring.

Your work is vital to making every American safer, and as I leave you, know that I’ll

always admire what you’ve done to defend our way of life. Customs and Border

Protection (CBP) Commissioner Kevin McAleenan will now lead DHS as your Acting

Secretary. Kevin has led the Department’s largest component for two years and his

qualifications and experience will be instrumental in overseeing the crisis at our

nation’s borders. I have full confidence in Kevin’s ability to carry out the DHS

mission of safeguarding the American people, our homeland, and our values. Please

join me in welcoming Kevin as the Acting Secretary.

To each of you I am eternally grateful for your service and could not be prouder to

have served alongside you. Thank you for your devotion and sacrifice. God bless

each of you and your families, and God bless this great country.

Topics: Homeland Security Enterprise, Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: Secretary Nielsen

Last Published Date: April 10, 2019

Topics News In Focus How Do I? Get Involved About DHS

> News > Press Releases > Farewell Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen

Official website of the Department of Homeland Security Contact Us Quick Links Site Map A-Z Index

Enter Search Term On DHS.gov

NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets

Homeland Security LIVE

In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia

National Terrorism Advisory System

Podcasts

Press Releases

Publications Library

Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive

Comunicados de Prensa

Topics Get Involved How Do I? News About DHS Site Links

DHS Components Accountability Privacy FOIA No Fear Act Accessibility Plain Writing Plug-ins Inspector General The

White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/homeland-security-enterprise

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/secretary-homeland-security

https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/secretary-nielsen

https://www.dhs.gov/

https://www.dhs.gov/topics

https://www.dhs.gov/news

https://www.dhs.gov/focus

https://www.dhs.gov/how-do-i

https://www.dhs.gov/get-involved

https://www.dhs.gov/about-dhs


https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/press-releases


https://www.dhs.gov/contact-us

https://www.dhs.gov/frequently-requested-pages

https://www.dhs.gov/sitemap

https://www.dhs.gov/dhsgov-z-index

https://www.dhs.gov/facebook

https://www.dhs.gov/twitter

https://www.dhs.gov/instagram

https://www.dhs.gov/linkedin

https://www.dhs.gov/flickr

https://www.dhs.gov/youtube

https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHS/subscriber/new


https://www.dhs.gov/blog

https://www.dhs.gov/topic/data

https://www.dhs.gov/events

https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/fact-sheets

https://www.dhs.gov/live


https://www.dhs.gov/media-contacts

https://www.dhs.gov/multimedia

https://www.dhs.gov/national-terrorism-advisory-system

https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/podcasts


https://www.dhs.gov/publications

https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-social-hub

https://www.dhs.gov/social-media-directory

https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/speeches?field_news_type_tid=439

https://www.dhs.gov/news-releases/testimony?field_news_type_tid=440

https://www.dhs.gov/news-archive

https://www.dhs.gov/comunicados-de-prensa






https://www.dhs.gov/site-links

https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-component-websites

https://www.dhs.gov/performance-financial-reports

https://www.dhs.gov/privacy-policy

https://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia

https://www.dhs.gov/homeland-security-no-fear-act-reporting

https://www.dhs.gov/accessibility

https://www.dhs.gov/plain-writing-dhs

https://www.dhs.gov/plug-information

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/

https://www.usa.gov/




EXHIBIT 55

Message from SecretaryKirstjen M. Nielsen on theResignation of ICE ActingDirector Ronald D. Vitiello


For over three decades, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director

Ronald Vitiello has protected our homeland with courage and conviction. Ron’s

knowledge and expertise as a seasoned law enforcement professional has been

invaluable to DHS, and he has left a legacy of excellence as our Department has

expanded and refined our efforts to curb illegal immigration and secure our

borders.

Ron’s career with the Department began in 1985 as a U.S. Border Patrol agent. Prior

to leading ICE, he served U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in a variety of

leadership roles, culminating in being named the Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol and

later that same year, named CBP’s Acting Deputy Commissioner.

During his tenure leading ICE, Ron has been an unwavering advocate for the

dedicated men and women who enforce our immigration laws and protect our

nation from the illegal entry of drugs, human trafficking, transnational criminals,

counterfeit goods, and so much more. On behalf of DHS I want to thank Ron for his

service and dedication, and I wish him the very best in this next chapter of his

career.

Topics: Homeland Security Enterprise, Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: ICE



> News > Press Releases > Message from Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on the Resignation of ICE Acting Director Ronald D. Vitiello



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/homeland-security-enterprise


https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/ice





























































EXHIBIT 56

Message from Secretary ofHomeland Security Kirstjen M.Nielsen


To the brave and dedicated men and women of DHS, I submitted my resignation to

the President this evening. I am eternally grateful and proud of what you do each

and every day to protect our homeland. Each of you are why I came back to serve

my country. Our missions as a Department are vast and have never been more vital.

You are in the arena—keep up the good fight. Thank you for your sacrifices and

those of your families.

God bless you, and God bless our great country.

Best Regards,

Kirstjen M. Nielsen

Secretary of Homeland Security

With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland,

and our values.

# # #

Topics: Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: Secretary Nielsen



> News > Press Releases > Message from Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/publication/resignation-letter-secretary-nielsen































































EXHIBIT 57

Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen inEurope for Bilateral SecurityMeetings, Representing U.S. atGathering of G7 InteriorMinisters


WASHINGTON- Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen will travel to

Europe this week to meet with senior officials from the governments of the United

Kingdom and Sweden prior to participating in the G7 Interior Ministers’ Meeting in

Paris, France. She is set to raise urgent matters with foreign partners on emerging

threats, including cybersecurity and risks to U.S. networks, the evolving terrorist

threat, and foreign adversary interference in the U.S. homeland—and how we can

work with allies to thwart these dangers.

On Monday, April 1 and Tuesday, April 2, the Secretary will meet with the U.S.

ambassador and country team at the Embassy in London. Nielsen will later hold a

bilateral meeting with UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid to advance transatlantic

collaboration against an array of security threats. While in London, she will also

confer with top UK counterterrorism and cybersecurity officials on sensitive matters

and efforts to stay ahead of common enemies.

On Wednesday, April 3, Secretary Nielsen will meet with the Minister of Home Affairs Mikael Damberg in

Sweden, where the pair plan to discuss actionable ways to enhance bilateral information sharing and joint

security activities, especially related to blocking foreign interference by nation-state adversaries. Nielsen will

also meet with officials at the U.S. Embassy in Stockholm.

On Thursday, April 4 and Friday, April 5, Secretary Nielsen will be in Paris to participate in the third annual G7

Interior Ministers’ meetings. The Secretary will meet with her security counterparts from Canada, France,

Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the European Union (EU). The Secretary will raise issues that require

immediate attention, including the challenge posed by illegal immigration, terrorist threats to the United

States and its allies, and how to confront new developments on the digital battlefield. Nielsen plans to hold

bilateral meetings with her counterparts from France, Germany, Canada, Italy, and the EU.

# # #

Topics: Cybersecurity

Keywords: Cybersecurity, Secretary Nielsen



> News > Press Releases > Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen in Europe for Bilateral Security Meetings, Representing U.S. at Gathering of G7 Interior Ministers



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/cyber-security

https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/cybersecurity






























































EXHIBIT 58

Secretary Nielsen Meets withMexican Officials on BorderEmergency, Travels toHonduras to Meet withNorthern TriangleGovernments to Address Crisisat Source

Release Date: Release Date: March 26, 2019

Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen met with senior officials from

the Government of Mexico Tuesday, March 26 to discuss border security and

immigration, and she will travel to Honduras to participate in multilateral meetings

with regional partners to discuss the common cause America shares with the

countries of Central America in confronting migration flows and promoting security

and prosperity. There she plans to sign a first-of-its-kind regional accord meant to

address the migration crisis.

The Secretary traveled to Miami, Florida on Tuesday for a bilateral meeting with

Mexican Secretary of the Interior Olga Sanchez Cordero and senior Mexican

government officials. They discussed ways the U.S. and Mexico can work together to

address irregular migration and the record levels of illegal entries at the U.S. Southern Border, where last

month DHS apprehended more than 75,000 individuals—a 12-year high. They also discussed combating

human trafficking and smuggling, security cooperation, and U.S. plans to bolster the Migrant Protection

Protocols (MPP), a DHS initiative to return migrants to Mexico and provide humanitarian protections while

they await U.S. immigration processing.

On Wednesday, March 27 the Secretary will be in Tegucigalpa, Honduras to participate in a multilateral

meeting at the Ministry of Security with Northern Triangle officials representing the governments of

Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. The meeting will mark the continuation of a multi-year diplomatic

process aimed at stemming the flood of irregular migration at the source, and ultimately help confront the

ongoing humanitarian and security emergency at the U.S. Southern Border. The meetings will be led by

Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández.

The Secretary and Northern Triangle security ministers have been working toward the development of a

first-of-its-kind Memorandum of Cooperation—or “regional compact”— between the U.S. and the countries

of the Northern Triangle. Reflecting improved cooperation between the countries, the accord focuses on

stemming the migration crisis at its source, including preventing the formation of new migrant caravans that

set out to reach the United States.

A final compact would cover four distinct areas of collaboration:

Combating Human Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling

Countering Organized Crime and Gangs

Expanding Information and Intelligence Sharing

Strengthening Border Security

Following Secretary Nielsen’s call for the formation of a “compact” last summer, in February she and

Northern Triangle security ministers announced the signing of a joint statement declaring a commitment to

reach a final deal to improve information sharing, law enforcement cooperation, and public messaging to

address the ongoing crisis.

Earlier on Wednesday, Nielsen will participate in bilateral meetings with the Honduran President Juan

Orlando Hernández and First Lady Ana García Carías at the Ministry of Security in Tegucigalpa.

###

Topics: International Engagement, Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: immigration, International partnerships

Last Published Date: March 26, 2019


> News > Press Releases > Secretary Nielsen Meets with Mexican Officials on Border Emergency, Travels to Honduras to Meet with Northern Triangle

Governments to Address Crisis at Source



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZD0mbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTkwMzI2LjM3NjU4MjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTkwMzI2LjM3NjU4MjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xODQ5ODI4NyZlbWFpbGlkPW1pY2hhZWwuYmFyc0BocS5kaHMuZ292JnVzZXJpZD1taWNoYWVsLmJhcnNAaHEuZGhzLmdvdiZ0YXJnZXRpZD0mZmw9JmV4dHJhPU11bHRpdmFyaWF0ZUlkPSYmJg==&&&100&&&https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/01/24/migrant-protection-protocols

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZD0mbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTkwMzI2LjM3NjU4MjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTkwMzI2LjM3NjU4MjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xODQ5ODI4NyZlbWFpbGlkPW1pY2hhZWwuYmFyc0BocS5kaHMuZ292JnVzZXJpZD1taWNoYWVsLmJhcnNAaHEuZGhzLmdvdiZ0YXJnZXRpZD0mZmw9JmV4dHJhPU11bHRpdmFyaWF0ZUlkPSYmJg==&&&101&&&https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/21/secretary-nielsen-announces-historic-steps-northern-triangle-security-ministers

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/international


https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/immigration

https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/international-partnerships





























































EXHIBIT 59

Acting Attorney General and Secretary ofHomeland Security Submit Joint Reporton Impact of Foreign Interference onElection and Political/CampaignInfrastructure in 2018 Elections

Release Date: Release Date: February 5, 2019

Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen

submitted a joint report to President Donald J. Trump on February 4, 2019 evaluating the impact of any

foreign interference on election infrastructure or the infrastructure of political organizations, including

campaigns and candidates in the 2018-midterm elections.

The classified report was prepared pursuant to section 1(b) of Executive Order 13848, Imposing Certain

Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Influence in a United States Election, which the President issued on

September 12, 2018.

Throughout the 2018 midterm election cycle, the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security worked

closely with federal, state, local, and private sector partners, including all 50 states and more than 1400 local

jurisdictions, to support efforts to secure election infrastructure and limit risk posed by foreign interference.

Efforts to safeguard the 2020 elections are already underway.

Although the specific conclusions within the joint report must remain classified, the Departments have

concluded there is no evidence to date that any identified activities of a foreign government or foreign agent

had a material impact on the integrity or security of election infrastructure or political/campaign

infrastructure used in the 2018 midterm elections for the United States Congress. This finding was informed

by a report prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) pursuant to the same

Executive Order and is consistent with what was indicated by the U.S. government after the 2018 elections.

While the report remains classified, its findings will help drive future efforts to protect election and

political/campaign infrastructure from foreign interference.

###

Topics: Election Security, Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: Department of Justice, Election infrastructure


> News > Press Releases > Acting Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security Submit Joint Report on Impact of Foreign Interference on Election and

Political/Campaign Infrastructure in 2018 Elections



About CISA Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Emergency

Communications

National Risk Management News & Media



White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/election-security


https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/department-justice

https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/election-infrastructure






















https://www.dhs.gov/CISA

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/about-cisa

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/cybersecurity

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/infrastructure-security

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/emergency-communications

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/national-risk-management

https://www.dhs.gov/cisa/news-media





















EXHIBIT 60

Joint Statement on Election DayPreparations

Release Date: Release Date: November 5, 2018

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the

Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)—in

coordination with federal, state, local, and private sector partners nationwide—are continuing efforts to

protect our elections. Today, DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, DNI Dan Coats,

and FBI Director Christopher Wray released the following joint statement:

“Our agencies have been working in unprecedented ways to combat influence efforts and to support state

and local officials in securing our elections, including efforts to harden election infrastructure against

interference. Our goal is clear: ensure every vote is counted and counted correctly. At this time we have no

indication of compromise of our nation’s election infrastructure that would prevent voting, change vote

counts, or disrupt the ability to tally votes.”

“But Americans should be aware that foreign actors – and Russia in particular – continue to try to influence

public sentiment and voter perceptions through actions intended to sow discord. They can do this by

spreading false information about political processes and candidates, lying about their own interference

activities, disseminating propaganda on social media, and through other tactics. The American public can

mitigate these efforts by remaining informed, reporting suspicious activity, and being vigilant consumers of

information, as discussed below.”

“The United States will not tolerate foreign interference in our elections from Russia, China, Iran, or other

nations. As noted in a joint statement on October 19, 2018, such actions are a threat to our democracy, and

identifying and preventing this interference is one of our highest priorities. On September 12, President

Trump signed an executive order that makes clear the U.S. government will not hesitate to defend our

electoral processes or punish those who attempt to undermine them.”

“Our agencies have been making preparations for nearly two years in advance of these elections and are

closely engaged with officials on the ground to help them ensure the voting process is secure. Americans can

rest assured that we will continue to stay focused on this mission long after polls have closed.”

To learn more about efforts to protect America’s elections please visit: https://www.dhs.gov/topic/election-

security.

Voters can take a few simple steps to help secure our elections, including:

Get Election Information Straight from the Source – Your State or Local Election Office. Call them or

check their website. They will have accurate information you can trust on the status of your voter

registration, polling hours and location, identification requirements, and election results.

Be Smart When Consuming or Sharing Election-Related Information: Know Your Source—And Think

Before You Link. Compare reporting from multiple sources to determine reliable information. Before

sharing, ask yourself, “Who wrote it? Who posted it? What are their sources?”

###

Topics: Election Security

Keywords: Election security


> News > Press Releases > Joint Statement on Election Day Preparations




Communications




White House USA.gov

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/1915-joint-statement-from-the-odni-doj-fbi-and-dhs-combating-foreign-influence-in-u-s-elections

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/

https://www.dhs.gov/topic/election-security


https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/election-security

















































EXHIBIT 61

Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Kicks OffNational Cybersecurity AwarenessMonth

Release Date: Release Date: October 3, 2018

On October 2, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen kicked off National

Cybersecurity Awareness Month (NCSAM), with a conversation at the Washington Post’s Cybersecurity

Summit. Secretary Nielsen discussed DHS’s continued efforts to secure our nation’s election systems and

combat the threats to our cyberspace.

Click here to watch the full conversation.

The Need for CISA:The Need for CISA: “The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Act has bipartisan support. It is

meant to recognize the importance of the mission that we have at DHS. We are responsible for federal

efforts when it comes to both protecting critical infrastructure, working with the owner-operators in

private sector, and protecting all those civilian dot govs. To do that, we have to have both a name that

indicates that is what we do, and we have to be able to streamline the organization so that we can

become more operational.”

Information Sharing:Information Sharing: “First of all, the information sharing is much stronger than it ever has been

before. We’re working very closely with the intel community. The moment that we see something

significant, we are, in conjunction with them, sharing with our state and local partners."

Preparing for Election Day:Preparing for Election Day: “For Election Day, we’re setting up a situational awareness room—a virtual

place where everybody can share information quickly. We are actually pre-deploying Hunt and

Incident Response Teams (HIRT)…we’ll be there to support our partners if they need it.”

Influence vs. Interference:Influence vs. Interference: “There are two categories that we’re worried about. One is the direct

attacks on election infrastructure. That is where DHS has the lead. The other is this more nefarious,

but also nebulous area of foreign influence. That can be done through state spokesmen in a foreign

country and through state-run media. In Russia, that could include RT and Sputnik.”

Our Adversaries:Our Adversaries: “Russia is more—at the moment—focused on sowing discord on all sides, and

through that chaos, hoping to promote their own policies. So it’s slightly different. China’s playing a

longer and more holistic game. Russia is being pretty noisy about it right now in terms of not just their

use of state-run media, but also what we attribute to be social media personas.”

2018 Elections:2018 Elections: “We currently have no indication that a foreign adversary intends to disrupt our

election infrastructure. But I will immediately follow that with, this is a point in time. We know they

have the capability and we know they have the will. So we’re constantly on alert. What we see with

China right now are influence campaigns, the more traditional, long-standing, holistic influence

campaigns.”

2017 Intel Community Assessment:2017 Intel Community Assessment: “The President has been clear, I’ve been clear, and the intel

community has been clear. We all support the intel community assessment from 2017. I would also

say to those in the audience, it’s worth rereading. There’s a lot in there that is still very relevant today,

including an entire annex on Russian propaganda and how they actually use state-sponsored media

and others to try to influence and sow discord in our society.”

This October marks the 15th year of National Cybersecurity Awareness Month an annual initiative to raise

awareness about the importance of cybersecurity. NCSAM is a collaborative public-private effort to ensure

that all Americans have the resources they need to stay safer and more secure online. DHS’s cybersecurity

efforts are not just a one-month effort. However, throughout the entire month, DHS will be highlighting our

department-wide efforts to enhance the security and resilience of the nation’s cyber ecosystem.

Learn more about NCSAM here.

Topics: Cybersecurity, Secretary of Homeland Security

Keywords: Cybersecurity, national cyber security awareness month


> News > Press Releases > Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Kicks Off National Cybersecurity Awareness Month




Communications




White House USA.gov

https://www.dhs.gov/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwapo.st%2F2y7XLC1

http://www.dhs.gov/national-cyber-security-awareness-month




https://www.dhs.gov/keywords/national-cyber-security-awareness-month

















































EXHIBIT 62

at: "'~ s~ r-o "'~ ~s s~ Q"i @)

)>~ ""::t: !!m xz nc CUI U'lm ~0 o_ 3:Z U'l~

0~ mz n)>

s:~ :t~O >z _.. )> -, o, z -< . ..

O< ;o -oen m-::o-1 "TlC:: ~(I) m

~~ :g ·c::

' r en m-e (/')en 0. ZC') ro z s:: m ®

~ I COHHERCIAL BASE PRICING

;-=- . USPs~ PRIORITY (· MAIL i MAILROOM

US SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STAT 1 1ST ST NE WASHINGTON DC 20343

sHIP CHRISTOPHER E. STRUNK TO: PMB 102

C/0 315 FLATBUSH AVENUE

BROOKLYN NY 11217

USPS TRACKING ~

1111111111 I Ill

BOX 1 f'rior lt

9205 5901 6778 4200 0000 1151 41

~~ ~t.TPnNtl. R~TE APPROVED #901677842 The UPS Store #5526 315 Flatbush Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11217

(718) 701-5294 storeS 5 26@theuo•atore.com

l -n :c ~ rrl OC') o~ o mZ (f))> -tr() )>:0 z> o--1 -rrl z -ic:J ~0 zx )> -i)> 0 z )> r c (/') m

r:r;p::-:;

1.: i

~~

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Christopher E. trunk c/o 3 I 5 Flatbush A venue PMB 102 Brooklyn, NY I 12 I 7

RE: lu Rc Strunk el al.

W ASIDNGTON, DC 20543-0001

November 5. 2018

Applicati on to The Chief Justice No: 16AI 190

Dear Mr. Strunk:

Your application lhal was received November 2. 2018 is herewith retumed for the following rcason(s):

lt is unclear exactly ""hat relief you seek and you haYe failed to show that this Court has the jurisdiction to grant the relief ought.

Enclosures

Sincerely, Scott S. l larris. Clerk By:

at•a Silver (202) 479-3027

---

-CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, in esse Sui juris

141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846

518-416-8743 Email: [email protected]

THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 FIRST STREET N.E. Washington DC 20543

In Re: Christopher Earl Strunk Petitioner,

Subject SCOTUS Rule 23-3 Application for an Extraordinary WRIT OF MANDAMUS APPLICATION taken from the 29 October 2018 denial of hearing taken from the U.S. Court of Appeals fo1· the Armed Forces

Dear Chief Justice Roberts,

t '

Undersigned propria persona has been diTected by the Clerk's office to resubmit the corrected application for equity relief, having been denied on 29 October 2018 hearing from the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of our 28 USC 1651 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief inter alia preserving the 6 November 2018 Mid-Term Election Paper Ballots and convening a Court of Inquiry pursuant to the letter and intent of the National Emergency Mandates issued by the Commander-in-Chief, Donald John Trump; see the accompanying:

• Original double sided Petition with signatures at page 11 with three exhibits including the Writ Appendix within Exhibit C,

• two (2) true and correct back and front printed copies • Certificate of Compliance • Certificate of Service

As undersigned affirms that the urgent relief sought is reasonable in that time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm were the relief not granted. The Undersigned states and declru·es under penalty of perjm-y that the foregoing application copy is true and correct with attac · true and correct py der 28 USC 17 46; Respectfully yours,

Dated: November 1'2 2018 Brooklyn, New Y01·k

R EARL STRUNK, in esse SuiJuns All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Attachments

cc: Vice President Michael Pence Noel Francisco, Solicitor General of the United States, DHS Office of General Counsel John M. Mitnick William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the USCAAF Harold William Van Allen

FILED NOV 2- 2018

No. ___ _

In the

SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk

Petitioner.

SCOTUS Rule 22-3 Application to Chief Justice John

Roberts with time as the essence and imminent

irreparable harm as if a Rule 20 Petition for an

Extraordinary Writ with 28 USC §1651(a)' for an

Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Equity

Relief pursuant to the National Emergency

Mandate(s) issued by the Commander-In·Chief,

Donald John Trump, for protection of U.S. Citizen

Voters at the 6 November 2018 National Mid-Term

General Election, for an Order of all States of the

several States and territories that:

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York Zip code excepted [12846]

Ph: 518·416-8743; Email: [email protected]

1 RECEIVED NOV U 2 2017

OFFlCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURt U.S.

us

m --m: 59~1

----=Z < > -- -- -~

:> --

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CLERK

WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001

Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzeme, NY 12846

RE: In Re Strunk et al.

Dear Mr. Strunk:

October 29, 2018

The above-entitled petition for an extraordinary writ of mandamus was received on October 29, 2018. The papers are retwned for the fo llowing reason(s):

No notarized affidavit or declaration of indigency is attached. Rule 39. You may use the enclosed fonn.

No affidavit or declaration of service, specifying the names and addresses of those served, was received. Rule 29.5

You must serve the Solicitor General and provide this office with proof of service. Rule 29.4(a).

The petition does not follow the form prescribed by Rule 14 as Tequired by Rule 20.2.

A copy of the rules of this Court are enclosed.

A copy of the corrected petition must be served on opposing counsel.

You must provide an original and l 0 copies of your petition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Rule 20.2.

If you are attempting to file an application for emergency relief, you must submit this filing separately. The application must comply with RuJes 22 and 23 of the Rules of this Court in all respects.

Enclosures

Sincerely, Scott S. Har · By:

Michael Duggan (202) 4 79-3025

CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, in esse Sui juris

141 Harris Avenue

Lake Luzerne, New York 12846


THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS

The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

1 FIRST STREET N.E.

Washington DC 20543

In Re: Christopher Earl Strunk and Harold Wflliam Van Allen SCOT US Rule 20 Procedure Applicat ion for an

Extraordinary WRIT OF MANDAMUS APPLICATION taken from the 29 October 2018 denial of hearing

taken from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces


Undersigned along with Harold William Van Allen are the propria persona petitioners that hereby"

make this emergency application for equity relief, having been denied on 29 October 2018 hearing from

the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of our 28 USC 1651 Petition for a Writ of M andamus and

Injunctive Relief inter alia preserving the 6 November 2018 Mid-Term Election Paper Bal lot s and

convening a Court of Inquiry pursuant to the letter and intent of the National Emergency Mandates

issued by the Commander-in-Chief, Donald John Trump; see the accompanying:

• ORIGINAL 29 October 2018 Mem.orandum by Kristen Haloj, USCAAF Docket Room Supervisor,

and

• Petition Original single sided with signatures at pages 31, thru 33 and the 333 pages Appendix,

• two (2) true and correct back and front printed copies

• Copy of the above Memorandum with the post-it phone number of DHS Attorney "Sara" having

been served with a copy at DHS Headquarters at noon today.

As undersigned confirms at Petition page 31, that the urgent relief sought is reasonable in that time

is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm were the relief not granted.

The Undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the..A:IiFee:GUJtg

under 28 USC 1746; Respectfully yours, fn'J. Dated: October -1~ 2018 ~

Washington District of Columbia ~-L-------4::~'----

Attachments

cc: Vice President Michael Pence

DHS Office of General Counsel John M . Mitnick Harold William Van Allen

CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED W ITHOUT PREJUDICE

RECEIVED

OCT 2 9 2018 OFfiCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT. U.S.

(/)

::::; ~) 1-W ::C:

C,_.! ·~ ~ N'

s

..0 lf)

61 0..

""' ""' ...... (_J

c::> ""'0

<=::> .......

No. ___ _

In the



Petitioner .

SCOTUS Rule 22-3 Application to Chief Justice J ohn



Extraordinary Writ with 28 USC § 1651(a) for an

Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Eqmty


Mandate(s) issued by the Commander-In-Chief,





Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne. New York Zip code excepted [12846]

Ph: 518-416-8743; Email: [email protected]

1

CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue

Lake Luzerne, New York 12846 518-416-8743 Email: [email protected]

THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 FIRST STREET N.E. Washington DC 20543

In Re: Christopher Earl Strunk Petitione1·,

Subject SCOTUS Rule 23·3 Application for an Extraordinary WRIT OF MANDAMUS APPLICATION taken from the 29 October 2018 denial of hearing taken from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces


Undersigned propria persona has been directed by the Clerk's office to resubmit the corrected application for equity relief, having been denied on 29 October 2018 hearing from the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of our 28 USC 1651 Petition for a Wl'it of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief inter alia preserving the 6 November 2018 Mid-Term Election Paper Ballots and convening a Court of Inquiry pursuant to the letter and intent of the National Emergency Mandates issued by the Commander-in-Chief, Donald John Trump; see the accompanying:

• Original double sided Petition with signatures at page 11 with three exhibits including the Writ Appendix within Exhibit C,

• two (2) true and correct back and front printed copies • Certificate of Compliance • Certificate of Service

As undersigned affirms that the urgent relief sought is reasonable in that time is of the essence wiLh imminent irreparable harm were the relief not granted. The Undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing application copy is true and correct with attac · true and correct py der 28 USC 17 46; Respectfully yours,

Dated: November 1'2 2018 Brooklyn, New York

Attachments

cc: Vice President Michael Pence

'1'Q.C~~H'R EARL STRUNK, in esse Sui Juns All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Noel Francisco, Solicitor General of the United States, DHS Office of General Counsel John M. Mitnick William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the USCAAF Harold William Van Allen

2720 words

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

No. ___ _

In the SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES


Petitioner.

As required by Rule , the Undersigned certifies that the SCOTUS Rule 22-3

PETITION WITH 28 USC §1651 FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTION

EQUITY RELIEF IN THE MATTER OF FOREIGN MEDDLING DURING THE 6

NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION CYCLE; contains 2720 words including the Petition

Text and Footnotes, excluding the parts of the petition that ru.·e exempted by rules,

and uses Century font with 12 Point type in the Text and no Footnotes.

The undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is

true and correct under 28 usc §1746: r Dated: November~ 2018 ~ »J (-/.. A

Brooklyn, New York ~ ~- ~ ~ Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris,

141 Ranis Avenue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846 Ph: 518~416-8743; Email: [email protected]

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

In the SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk,

Petitioner

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On November 2, 2018, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC 17 46, caused the service of a copy of the SCOTUS Rule 22-3 PETITION UNDER RULE 67(C) FOR A 28 USC §1651 SPECIAL WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF IN affirmed November 1, 2018 and placing a true copy of each bound copy in an envelope marked "urgent legal process" with proper postage for delivery by the USPS upon:

Vice President of the U.S.A. Michael R. Pence 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20500

Noel Francisco, Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001

John M. Mitnick, DHS General Counsel 245 Murray Lane, SW Mail Stop 0485 Washington, DC 20528-0485

Phil Murphy NJ Governo1· PO Box 001 Trenton, NJ 08625

Governor John Bel Edwards Office of the Governor PO Box 94004 Baton Rouge, LA 70804

Dated: November f2 , 2018 Brooklyn New York

Nathan Deal Governor of Georgia 203 Capitol Place SW, Atlanta, GA 30334

Henry McMaster, Gover·nor of South Carolina State House 1100 Gervais Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201

John Carney Governor of Delaware Carvel State Office Building 820 N. French Street, 12th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States (OAS) 1889 F Street N. W. Washington, DC 20006

William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 450 East Street NW, Washington, DC 20442.

1

No. __________

In the


__________________________________________________________________


Petitioner.

__________________________________________________________________

SCOTUS Rule 22-3 Application to Chief Justice John



Extraordinary Writ with 28 USC §1651(a) for an

Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Equity


Mandate(s) issued by the Commander-In-Chief,





__________________________________________________________________

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona

141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York Zip code excepted [12846] Ph: 518-416-8743; Email: [email protected]

2

Table of Contents

Parties in Interest ....................…………………….…………….….…………….….. ......3

Jurisdiction.................................................................................................................3

Table of Authorities................................................................................................ ...4

Related Cases…………………………………………….………………………...................5

Constitutional Violation Issues………..………………..……………………..................6

Statement of Facts ………………………………………………………………...................7

Questions Presented in aid of Review......................................................................8

Relief Sought............................................................................................................10

Petition Verification Affidavit………………… ………………………..….......................11

3

Parties in Interest: Harold William Van Allen 351 North Road Hurley New York 12443 Vice President of the U.S.A. Michael R. Pence 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20500 John M. Mitnick, DHS General Counsel 245 Murray Lane, SW Mail Stop 0485 Washington, DC 20528-0485 Noel Francisco, Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001

Phil Murphy NJ Governor PO Box 001 Trenton, NJ 08625 Governor John Bel Edwards Office of the Governor PO Box 94004 Baton Rouge, LA 70804

Nathan Deal Governor of Georgia 203 Capitol Place SW, Atlanta, GA 30334

Henry McMaster, Governor of South Carolina State House 1100 Gervais Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201

John Carney Governor of Delaware Carvel State Office Building 820 N. French Street, 12th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States (OAS) 1889 F Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006

William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 450 East Street NW, Washington, DC 20442.

Jurisdiction

The Constitution for the United States of America (CUSA) Article 3 Section 2

Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Rule 22-3: "...An application shall be

addressed to the Justice allotted to the Circuit from which the case arises. An

application arising from the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

shall be addressed to the Chief Justice. .."

4

Table of Authorities

Statutes

28 USC §1651(a)

28 USC §2201

28 U.S. Code §1251 - Original jurisdiction (b) The Supreme Court shall have

original but not exclusive jurisdiction of: (2) All controversies between the

United States and a State; and (3) All actions or proceedings by a State against

the citizens of another State or against aliens.

10 U.S. Code §801 Definitions - 9 The term "accuser"

10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law

Title 10 §935. Art. 135. Court of Inquiry

U.S. Army Civil Affairs Operations FM 3-57 dated 31 October 2011 applies with

Chapter 4 Section 52 as to the civilian event of the early voting ongoing mid-

term "elections"

18 U.S. Code §7-7

12 USC 95(a): 50 USC App. 5(b) still a National Emergency of Executive

Proclamations 2039 and 2040 by authorization of Congress by 12 USC 95(b)

The Emergency Powers Act of Sept. 14, 1976 PL 94-412 90 Stat. 1255, expressly

retained 12 USC §95(a) with 50 USC Appendix §5(b)

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (50 U.S.C. 1701-

1707), EBRA remains the law of the land over banking and commerce

internationally cited by the Congressional Research Service Report to Congress

98-505 “National Emergency Powers” update September 18, 2001.

5

The Sedition Act of 1918 (Pub.L. 65–150, 40 Stat. 553, enacted May 16, 1918)

that was an Act of the United States Congress that extended the Espionage Act

of 1917

the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 3131-3134)

50 USC 212: Confiscation of property employed to aid insurrection

Administrative Procedures Act Pub.L. 79–404, 60 Stat. 237, of June 11, 1946,

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 (26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1–7)

Robinson–Patman Act of 1936 (or Anti-Price Discrimination Act, Pub. L. No. 74-

692, 49 Stat. 1526 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 13)) is a United States federal law that

prohibits anticompetitive practices by producers, specifically price

discrimination

Civil Service Reform Act of October 13, 1978, (Pub.L. 95–454, 92 Stat. 1111)

Executive Order 13714 of December 15, 2015 Strengthening the Senior

Executive Service

Related Cases

In Re: Schulz etal. v State of New York etal. NDNY 07cv00943 (LEK) file a very

large set of multidistrict cases one in each State of the several states with a

separate Plaintiff in each State, therein challenging the unconstitutional use of

electronic voting rather than paper ballots with a chain of custody for counting

and tally and for which the corrupt civil courts buried the cases and terrorized

Robert Schulz for the past 6 years;

In re: Strunk etal USCAAF Dkt. NO.16-0413

6

In re: Strunk eta. USCAAF Dkt. NO.16-0512

In Re: STRUNK v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA etal. NYND 16-cv-1496 (BKS/

DJS) was a challenge to the vote fraud involving illegal voters in California and

New York to no avail in anticipation of results obtained by the Presidential 2016

Election Integrity Commission ordered 11 May 2017 that Judge Sannes

dismissed the case without prejudice on 15 May 2017.

Washington State Courts Appellate Court Case Summary for Petition for Writ of

Mandamus, James M. Miller v. Secretary of State, Kim Wyman No. 96235-9

filed on 28 August 2018.

Constitutional Violation Issues

Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, (October 13, 1978, Pub.L. 95–454, 92 Stat.

1111) inter alia is constitutionally questionable because it creates a fourth

branch of government that falls under foreign control and denies substantive

due process under APA by eliminating the single complaint review agency, and s

conceals SES member Plum Book listings by encryption and obfuscation.

Executive Order 13714 of December 15, 2015 Strengthening the Senior

Executive Service (SES) by a non US Citizen SES member defacto POTUS

Non US Citizen SES members quid pro quo arranged non-bid contracts for

SERCO INC. violates the Sherman Anti-trust and Robinson Patman Acts

Removing human beings from ballot counting with use of software /electronics.

7

Statement of Facts

1. Petitioner in anticipation of vote fraud in this 2016 election cycle, was aware

that according to Don Inbody, a senior lecturer in political science at Texas State

University (before entering academia, he served 28 years on active duty in the

Navy, retiring as a captain) that in the 2012 presidential election, some 250,000

overseas and military voters who apparently wanted to vote were unable to

navigate the system, and while overall the military population will vote at a higher

rate than the general population, those stationed overseas vote at a significantly

lower rate. The voting rate among overseas military personnel for that election was

probably less than 20 percent, a sure sign that there’s more work needed to ensure

the full enfranchisement of Americans serving their country abroad.

2. In March 2016, Petitioner filed a writ In re: Strunk etal USCAAF Dkt.

NO.16-0413 to protect the absentee ballots in the 2016 election cycle (see Exhibit A).

3. In April 2016, Petitioner filed for a writ In re: Strunk etal. USCAAF Dkt.

NO.16-0512 (see Exhibit B).

4. On 15 December Petitioner filed STRUNK v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

etal. NYND 16-cv-1496 (BKS/ DJS) was a challenge to the vote fraud involving

illegal voters in California and New York to no avail in anticipation of results

obtained by the Presidential 2016 Election Integrity Commission ordered 11 May

2017 that Judge Sannes dismissed the case without prejudice on 15 May 2017.

5. On 29 October 2018, in anticipation of vote fraud in this 2018 election cycle

and based upon filing success at the USCAAF, Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus filing

8

was barred by the Docket Clerk Memorandum attached with my letter to SCOTUS

Chief Justice John Roberts see Exhibit C quote:

Upon receipt and review of a petition produced by Mr. Christopher E. Strunk, in reference to paper ballots and alleged meddling in the mid-term general election, 1 informed Mr. Strunk that the Court of Criminal Appeals for the Armed Forces may not be the appropriate Court in which to file. The Court, is an independent tribunal established under Article I of the Constitution, which regularly interprets federal statutes, executive orders, and departmental regulations. The Court also determines the applicability of constitutional provisions to members of the armed forces. Through its decisions, the Court has a significant impact on the state of discipline in the armed forces, military readiness, and the rights of service members. The Court plays an indispensable role in the military justice system."

6. That in anticipation of vote fraud in this 2018 election cycle Petitioner

on 22 October 2018 mailed his absentee ballot for the 6 November 2018 National

Mid-Term General Election as shown in Exhibit C at APX 095.

7. That based upon information and belief without belaboring the point,

Petitioner has no reason to believe that vote fraud and or interference with the

election cycle has improved; but is worse to the point of social unrest.

Questions Presented in aid of Review

8. Does the jurisdiction of this court apply only to this court under 12

USC 95(a): 50 USC App. 5(b) for all due process under National Emergency

Proclamations 2039 and 2040 by authorization of Congress by 12 USC 95(b) and by

Executive Orders under The Emergency Powers Act of Sept. 14, 1976 PL 94-412 90

Stat. 1255, expressly retained 12 USC §95(a) with 50 USC Appendix §5(b) and The

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (50 U.S.C. 1701-1707),

9

EBRA remains the law of the land over banking and commerce internationally cited

by the Congressional Research Service Report to Congress 98-505 “National

Emergency Powers” update September 18, 2001?

9. To the extent that the Constitution still applies under the 85 year

continuing emergency, as the only constitutional Article 3 express Court of equity,

does this court have jurisdiction for protection of all U.S. Citizen Voters at the 6

November 2018 National Mid-Term General Election, and for issuing an Order of

all States of the several States and territories?

10. Under continuing National Emergency, do Commander-in-chief (CINC)

executive orders broaden jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the

Armed Forces use of 28 USC §1651(a)?

11. During the on-going national emergency military administrative

occupation, does any other Article 1 Court have the jurisdiction to convene a Title

10 §935. Art. 135. Court of Inquiry into Foreign Meddling during the 6 November

2018 Election Cycle under 10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal

law other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces?

12. During the on-going national emergency, does any other Article 1

Court have the jurisdiction to convene a Title 10 §935. Art. 135. Court of Inquiry

into Foreign Meddling during the 6 November 2018 Election Cycle under 10 U.S.

Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law other than the United States

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces?

10

13. What court of inquiry other than under 10 USC § 935 would derive

from the purpose and use of The Sedition Act of 1918 (Pub.L. 65–150, 40 Stat. 553,

enacted May 16, 1918) that was an Act of the United States Congress that extended

the Espionage Act of 1917 to cover a broader range of offenses that Petitioners

contend is related to the subject 2018 Election cycle foreign interference?

14. To the extent that the United States of America remains a member of

the Organization of American States (OAS) and that this Court nor any other court

under the emergency executive order takes jurisdiction over of the protection

against Foreign Meddling during the 6 November 2018 Election Cycle, would

remedy be found in a court of inquiry created at the Inter-American Commission on

Human Rights with its headquarters in Washington, D.C. that exists for the

promotion and protection of human rights and has a duty to review this writ and

the imminent irreparable harm?

Relief Sought

Pursuant to the National Emergency Mandate(s) issued by the

Commander-In-Chief, Donald John Trump, warned by the 12 September

2018 Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of

Foreign Interference in a United States Election the need for protection of

U.S. Citizen Voters at the 6 November 2018 National Mid-Term General

Election, that affect military operations CINC for an Order of all States of

the several States and territories that relief sought is listed in the Petition

Verification Affidavit as follows::

User

Cross-Out

PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.

COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under

penalty of perjury:

I have read the foregoing Petition for an Extraordinary Writ with 28 USC

§1651(a) under SCOTUS Rule 20 with time as the essence and imminent i:rrepaTable

ha1·m for an Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Equity Relief Pursuant to

the National Emergency Mandate(s) issued by the Commander-In-Chief, Donald John

Trump, for protection of U.S. Citizen Voters at the 6 November 2018 National Mid·

Term General Election, for an Order of all States of the several States and territories

that:

A. Five states in the United States - Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, New Jersey, and Delaware, that only run their elections using dll·ect 1·ecording elect1·onic machines (DREs), shall pmvide notice to all individual U.S. Citizen voters at the polls to 0 NL Y use Provisional Paper Ballots under the Help America to Vote Act (HA VA) as applies to all States of the several States and territories (Authorities); and

B . Authorities are to preserve, safeguard and count all absentee paper ballots along with all paper ballots cast on 6 November 2018 by U.S. Citizen Vote1·s at the National Mid·Term General Election in the State of New Ym·k and the several States and territories, until further notice by this Cour t; and

C. Due to the failure of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity to prevent election fraud and interference, The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall Convene a Title 10 §935. Art. 135. Cow·t of Inquiry into foreign meddling during the 6 November 2018 Election Cycle; and

D. The Court of Inquiry shall issue a report for the Department Of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen; and for

E. Such other and different relief deemed necessary.

JIVhereas a.ffirmant Petitioner is an Accuser defined by 10 USC 801-9 for

offenses against nationals of the United States outside the jurisdiction of any nation

defined by 18 USC §7 -7 as if for special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the

United States using Court Rule 67(c) as to Civil Affairs under the 12 USC §95(a)

amended 50 USC App. §5(b) ongoing emergency with the Military Government U.S.

Army duties in the Community under the Honorable Donald J. Trump POTUS I

Commander-in-Chief (CINC), as is defined by the U.S. Al·my Field Manual (FM) now

amended into Civil Affairs Opez·ations FM 3-57 dated 31 October 2011 applies with

Chapte1· 4 Section 52 as to the civilian event of the early voting ongoing mid-term

"elections" with the deadline of 6 November 2018 that affect military operations CINC

warned of with the 12 September 2018 Executive Orde.1· on Imposing Certain

Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Intezt'erence in a United States Election and that

time is of the essence with imminent iTreparable harm; and

Affirmant knows the contents thereof apply to me by misapplication and

administration of laws a nd that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to

the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those

matters I believe it to be true, am available for testimony. The grounds of my beliefs as

to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books

and records, and personal know ledge.

Subscribed and Sworn to before me This~ day ofNovember 2018

ZEMIN WU NQ7A~Y PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK ~ ~Y6228541

No Y Pub~ollfied In Queens County My Commission Expire& September 20. 2012.

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

EXHIBIT A In re: Strunk etal USCAAF Dkt. NO.16-0413

to protect the absentee ballots in the 2016 election cycle

In re Christopher E. Strunk,

Christopher B. Garvey,

and

Harold W. Van Allen,

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Washington, D.C.

USCA Dkt. No. 16-0413

DOCKETING NOTICE

ORDER

Petitioners

Notice is hereby given that a petition under 28 USC § 1651 for writ of mandamus and injunction equity relief in the matter of the New York Republican Party POTUS Primary on April 19, 2016, and the National General Election on November 8, 2016, was filed under Rule 27(a) on March 18,2016, and placed on the docket this 24th day of March, 2016. On consideration thereof, it is, by the Comt this 24th day of March, 2016:

ORDERED:

That said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

cc: Petitioners (Pro Se)

For the Court,

Is/ William A. DeCicco Clerk of the Court

REC l i ED

'16 li;Jl 1 A ·16 K n 1

16- -OP

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ARMED FORCES

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, Christopher Blaise Garvey,

and Harold William Van Allen,

Petitioners.

PETITION WITH 28 USC §1651 FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTION EQUITY RELIEF IN THE MATTER OF THE NEW YORK

REPUBLICAN PARTY POTUS PRIMARY ON APRIL 19,2016 AND NATIONAL GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016; PURSUANT

TO THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANDATE BY THE DE-FACTO COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, UNDER THE:

HAGUE CONVENTION, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, INTERNATIONAL COVENANT OF CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS,

AND CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona c/o 315 Flatbush Avenue- PMB 102

Brooklyn, New York Zip code excepted [11217] Ph: 718-414-3760; Email: [email protected]

Christopher Blaise Garvey in esse, in propria persona 16 Nicoll A venue

Amityville, New York 11701 Ph: 631-598-0752; Email: [email protected]

RECEIV ED

Harold William Van Allen in esse, in propria persona 351 North Road

Hurley New York 12443 RECEIVED

'Hi KMl 1 Ph: 845-389-4366; Email: [email protected] '16 t:.\r. 1

PARTIES IN INTEREST

Roger J. Bernstein, Esq. 535 Fifth Avenue, 35th Floor New York, New York 10017

Brian L. Quail, Esq. and Kimberly Galvin, Esq. for New York State Board of Elections

40 North Pearl Street, 5th Floor Albany, New York 12207

Grant M. Lally, Esq. Lally & Misir, LLP

for Ted Cruz 220 Old Country Road

Mineola, New York 11501

Marco Rubio P.O. Box 55870 1

Miami Florida 33255 870 l

JINDAL FOR PRESIDENT P.O.BOX 5101

BATON ROUGE, LA 70821-5101

Barack Hussein Obama II President of the United States'

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

Washington DC 20500

Introduction

Relief Sought

Petitioners

Issues Presented:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1

7

10

25

A The New York State Board of Elections illegally changed the eligibility of a candidate for President of the United States (POTUS) without benefit of any law

B To be a .. natural-born Citizen .. under the U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section I Clause 5 (A2S 1 C5) a person must be born in the United States of US Citizen Parents pursuant to the definition in The Law of Nations Book I Section 212

C Notwithstanding a write-in vote as a speech issue, all US Citizens registered to vote and who vote for office of POTUS have a personal right and are entitled to an accurate ballot, must rely on the government to guarantee that all candidates are eligible to protect against infringement and or taking of a Citizen's vote property

D. Notwithstanding whether we have a National Emergency defacto martial process or have a dejure civilian due process, a Citizen is entitled to postliminy relief for return of personal right property guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

E The Armed Forces Absentee Ballot for both the Primaries and General Election must use only candidates who are "natural-born Citizens" have a write-in choice

F. The State Courts' decision imposes an undue burden on litigants Federal rights

Conclusion

Statutes 28 usc §1651

28 usc §2201

10 U.S. Code§ 932- Art. 132. Frauds against the United States

10 U.S. Code§ 907- Art. 107. False official statements

10 U.S. Code§ 881- Art. 81. Conspiracy

10 U.S. Code§ 878- Art. 78. Accessory after the fact

10 U.S. Code§ 877- Art. 77. Principals

ii

27

12 USC 95(a): 50 USC App. S(b) still a National Emergency of Executive Order 2039 and 2040 by authorization of Congress by 12 USC 95(b)

The Emergency Powers Act of Sept. 14, 1976 PL 94-412 90 Stat. 1255, expressly retained 12 USC §95(a) with 50 USC Appendix §5(b)

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (50 U.S.C. 1701-1707), EBRA remains the law of the land over banking and commerce intemationally cited by the Congressional Research Service Report to Congress 98-505 "National Emergency Powers" update September 18, 2001.

US Constitution

U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S 1 C5)

U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 8 Clause 10

Cases

Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393

Minor v.Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875)

US. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971)

Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032

Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207, 210 (1935)

Staub v. Citv of Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 319-20 (1958), or (2) impose an undue burden on the ability of litigants to protect their federal rights, see, e.g., Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131, 138 (1988)

Treaties

Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV) of October 18, 1907, especially Section III Military Authority Over the Territory of the Hostile State Articles 42 through 56

International Covenant of Civil And Political Rights (ICCPR) especially Articles 2 and25

Other Sources

The Law ofNations, by Emer de Vattel (b. 25 Apri11714- d. 28 December 1767) was published in 1758

Original Draft of the Declaration of Independence

APPENDIX annexed with pages APX- 001 through APX - 434

iii

EXHIBIT B In re: Strunk etal. USCAAF Dkt. NO.16-0512

In re Christopher E. Strunk,

and

Eric J. Phelps,

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Washington, D.C.

USCA Dkt. No. 16-0512

DOCKETING NOTICE

Petitioners ORDER

Notice is hereby given that a petition under Rule 67 (C) for a 28 USC § 1651

special writ of mandamus and injunctive equity relief in the matter of the breach of

contract in 1999 with repeal ofthe Glass-Steagall Act during the National Banking

Emergency or Time Of War and National Emergency Mandates by the Defacto

Commander-in-Cruet: under the Hague Convention, United States Army Field

Manual for Civil Mfairs Operations, Uniform Code of Military Justice, and

Constitution of the United States of America was filed under Rule 27(a) on May 2,

2016, and placed on the docket this 5th day of May, 2016. On consideration

thereof, it is, by the Court this 5th day of May, 2016,

ORDERED:

That said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; and

Strunk, et al., Docket No. 16-0512

That, no further filings will be accepted or docketed by the Court on this

matter.

cc: Petitioners (Pro Se)

For the Court,

Is/ William A. DeCicco Clerk of the Court

2

CJ IRISTOPHER E. STRUNK do 315 Flatbush A venue PMB 1 02 Brooklyn New York l12 I 7 Ph: 718-414-3760 Email [email protected]

vs p ~~ fi:A-CJ< I rJG Bon. William A. DeCicco, Clerk ofthe United States Court of Appeals tor the Armed rorccs 450 "E" Street NW Washington District ofColumhia 20442

Rt:garding: In Rc: STRUNK and PHELPS, Petitioners

q ~-c~( 5" r l.f(c 2$ ttJ(, I J.ft&8i.f'L 7

Subject: Application for Petition for Special Writ of Mandamus and Jnjuncti\'e Eqllity Relief

Dear Clerk of the Court

Attached herewith is The Original of the PETITION UNDER RULE 67(C) FOR A 28 USC

n651 SPECIAL WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF

f.\ THE MA ITER OF THE BREACH OF CONTRACT IN 1999 \VITH REPEAL

OF THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT DURJNG THE NATIONAL BANKJNG

E\IFRGE~CY OR TIME OF WAR AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY

~1:\:\TIATES BY THE DE-FACTO COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF. UNDER THE:

HAGl-E CONVENTION, UNITED STATES ARMY FIELD MANUAL FOR

CI\.IL AFFAIRS OPERATIONS, UNJFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.

A"'D CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA affinncd Apri~ cf7

2o 16 ,,;ih 7 copies. along with the Certificate of Compliance and Certificate Of Service.

n'"ea' April;z Y 2016 G['/w; c~ , \c_/t 9rooklvnNewYork ~ \.. ~- ,..,. ____ ,

Chris ~pher Earl Strunk m esse Stu Jtms. m propna personu cio 31 5 Flatbu.sh A venue - PMB 1 02 Brooklyn, New York Zip code excepted [ 112171 Ph: 718-414-3760~ Email: [email protected]


No.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk~ and Eric Jon Phelps, Petitioners.

As required by Rule . the Undersigned certifies that the PETITION UNDER RULE 67(C) FOR A 28 USC §1651 SPECIAL WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND

lNJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF IN THE MATTER OF THE BREACH OF CONTRACT IN 1999 WITH REPEAL OF THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT

DURING THE NATIONAL BANKING EMERGENCY OR TIME OF WAR AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANDATES BY THE DE-FACTO

COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, UNDER THE: HAGUE CONVENTION, UNITED STATES ARMY FJELD MANUAL FOR CIVIL AFFAIRS OPERATIONS, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTJCE, AND CONSTITUTION OF

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. contains 7263 words on 22 pages including the Petition Text and Footnotes, excluding the parts of the petition that are exempted by rules, and uses Times New Roman tont with 14 Point type in the Text

and 12 Point type in Footnotes.

The undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct under 28 USC § 1746:

Dated: Aprilzt 2o1s

Brooklyn, New Yot·k L

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona c/o 315 Plat bush Avenue- PMB I 02 Brooklyn. New York Zip code excepted [ 112171 Ph: 718-414-3760~ Email: surctynomore@gmai l.com All Rigbrs Reserved Witllout Prejudice

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JtOR THE ARMED FORCES

ln re: Christopher Earl Strunk, and Eric .Jon Pbclps,

Petitioners

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On April 24, 2016, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC 1746, caused the service of a copy of the PE'll'llON UNDER RULE 67(C) FOR A 28 USC *1651 SPECLA.L WRlT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTfVE EQI.J ffY RELIEF fN THE M~TfER OF TL IE OREACil Of CONTRACT IN I 999 WfT11 REPEAL Of THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT DURfNG 1HE NATIONAL BANKING EMERGENCY OR TfNlE OF WAR AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY tvlANDATES BY TI fE DE-FACTO COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF. UNDER THE: HAGUE CONVENTION, UNITED STATES ARMY FIELD MANUAL FOR CIVIL AFFAIRS OPERATIONS. UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUS11CE. AND CONSTITUTION OF THE f UNITED STATES OF .4J\1ERJCA affirmed April 21, 2016 and placing a true copy of each bound copy in an envelope marked "Urgent L\.:gal Papers" with proper postage tor delivery by the USPS upon:

GE~ERAL MARK ALEXANDER MILLEY Chief of Staff of the United States Army

:!04 Amty Pentagon Washington, DC 203 I 0-0204 Certified Mail: 700518200007o10880686

BARACK HUSSEfN OBAMA ll. Commander in Chief, Pres idem of the United States of America

Tlle White House 1600 Penn&ylvania Avenue. N.W. Washington Districr of Columbia [20500]

Certified Mail: 70051820000740880693

JACUB JOSEPH LEW. Secretary of the US Treasury -- Department of1h~: Treasury

l500Pennsylvania Avenue, N.\\'. Washington District of Columbia [20220]

Certitied Mail: 70051820000740880709

JOHN 1'-0SKJNEN, Commissioner Internal Revenu\; Service Office ofCon:missioner,

II ll Constitution ;\ vennc, NW Washington. DC (20224j

Certified Mail: 70051820000740880716

ROBERT DRUSKrN, cxccuuvc Chaim1an of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corpordtion

55 Water Street, 1-Sl. Nu\.\ Yu1k New YoJk [1004 -00041

Ce1tified Mail: 70051820000740880723

.do-declare and- certify un er penalty of peijury:

Dated:April2Y,2016 E .... ·" ~ 3rooklvn New Yorl<' ( ~ ---~

· Chris op er arl Strunk in esse Sui j ris, in propria persona cto 315 Flatbush A venue - PMB 102

Brooklyn,. New York Zip code excepted (1121 7] Ph: 7 I 8-414-3760; Email: [email protected]

• • FROM: ... ._...... PWONW8 f1-J¥-a-~ - ~~Ut-Jfc.. -;JIS" Fl4T~SH A. V- Hrtf] /o z_ 81e.~1c::( y J(_)!f 112-17

: . • I t O • ••

Ulif'S• Co•- ."'<;! II<> ~-~ACCI No O<f'l>oUII-~ACCI No

• . . . . . 0 SIGNATURE REQUIRED - Tht ,_ l!l.ISt ~ lhO ~· ~roct bOx •..,. ,_, II Fleq....,;lh'·•~·..-·t,..r..alut•. OA'·~~.,.,..a OA J)Pv":..MMICOOM~.OA<t• ~Ar-·.·~ ~~ ........ _,. .... DOil.f'IOt~ .... ~S.OC. .. Iu'4W..tlil'l'll"! .. ~-. -·---. ----~10-.. --.~.,.,-,.. O.UVtfY Options

0 No S.r .. ··kf 0.1\'0'Y (do.'lWrOd """ oo.rn.ss do'fl 0 s.m.rMo~Geyo..o-y~~- ,_..,_., 0 1030 Al.l DeM<y ~·•tO (adO~ IM.-. c-/11i1301(,")

'Re•ono USPS.ccm' Clfoc41 Po>> Ofr<:<~"lot ~M<lll>r•tv.

TO: ~PMm rj!} ~ ... ~j_gf PtiCI'\'E i ..- - -

, .; ; .. : fM IIKC! ~ f17. W A-l-oo.J C.t..Jii!,R-1<"" usc 1t r, ~ 7'fufl.D c,l! ~ v ,...,.. _ .; II tJ'te$/f;. "e>'fl' #\:!! co ur<rrv vs;'c: ' e.<> I 41 A ~'f<t:J' ;tr. Zt>T T-t-f. ~u~ ~~fss[~ ... f:Ht A P4 F

L~-1-D-L-____ • For plelcup or USPSTreelclng-. vtall USPS.com « eaiiSOG-222·1811. • 5100.00 Insurance Included.

11111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 11111 11111 1111 11111111 ~ 1111 El 399711934 US

Q UNITED STI.lTES I PRIORITY P7:5n7J[ "SERVICE • *MAIL*

EXPRESS ~

. . . . . . 0•-Do~y 0~ owo..., ODPO

P07JPCo<le - DoiNo<y Dolo ~

I OIJ2J I ·~)-/6 sJJ/c 0...~\1/MOOYV) ~o.r.~

,.,..,..,.,.Foe c.oor ..

!/ :2'1·/to Q IQ-~AM QOFIJ $ $ D •<NOON

T-~ 1~ .a.u Ootvo!y r .. -·R-.p~Foe U...4r',nUII

,2.' ),2~ :,.. •..-reo

s s s VlloQI'C 0"""11.>:.0 &nlr~ "'-"fee TOW "<rslaaO & •-

~ $ )J/o, 1 b..lon. /ffc-

' .. . o.e...y -(IM«YVY) TN En'c:iiC>tM ~

--~JAIOO'N) TN

~

0028 20

I I '

,.,:Jt ' /

0~12+12016

O~M DPM

~IS4gno;ln

D»>• OP!.t

2:COSTOMER cOPY

1

--

,., ~~~~~ ~ l!~l!iU~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!!~~~ ~ ~~t~;~N~;: 20~;iici' e.Qaoteutwww_~u.spa.Cbfo& ··. ~i

~ - - , .$3,?CI 1"CJ CJ CJ Refilm Receipt ~

"''ldorHinenl Rocr.:lfedl Cel1i:.oa ,...., t=

Cl -~o.av -" · ru (EndOrumcnt RL ' I)

~ H.~--'IOtlltPo$tago

-t-2.-:t& $0.00 10'~tlt3 $0.00 $"0";00

0028 \ 20

,~'\.:~) ·. ~>~ ; ............ .

0412412016 U1 CJ Cl 1"-

$13.15 - \ 1 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA H, Commander in Chief,

President of the United States of America The White I louse 1600

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington District of Columbia [20500 j

tr

~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t!~~~ ~ :}:~~~·· :· · ~· ·' t yf,webslli! &~LwwW.\JSJ1S~eom11 •

~ WASHINGTON, DC 20220 a l __ C ~ Pt. s3.w 1"c:J c:J c:J

I- ~~.79

Rotum ~Fee iO • 06 C..ufle<JF~ r= $0.00

~ .... Req:.ilod) $0. 00 ~ ;tes1rleled De~- - TO .'Q(t j ~ ~AI.,

0028 20

Pcntm~ .. . Her,.: -. .Jt ·' ·' •

"·'if' - ' ... .-=~ $7 -~ I . _ ro•<~~ Po~t,g~ bo f '' $ 04n412016

$13. S" - - \ JACOB JOSEPII LEW, Secretary of the United States Treasur

-·- Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue. N.W.

Washing1on District of Columbia [202201

~ -. .NETI.'TORJ("JRI!OO~ 1

Cl L. - -=r t3.1:~(1 J I"- Po~ . -U.7 Cl Ccn!lledi'Gt r- $0.00 Cl -40.01)-Cl ~~ so.oo ru flot;~ric!..'<l Oo:J!;, rr . ~ <() ldorJCmenl fi ... $ 6.

0028 20

Poetrwk H'l:v

c,\ ··<'.,, 0 . = f<).- 1

.-'I • U1 rOtalPOIMG( $!2.'lftt 04/24/2016 0 -

0 l ROBER r DRUSKIN, Executive Chainnan o:Jthe !"- 1 • Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation . ·•••

I ll 55 Water Street. 1-SL. -··

I CL__ New York New York II 0041-0004) .. - ,,. .

1_. ~ ~ ltmY--C>iJCJ:J

I~ f .r.J)~-[j!I ••• Ut\iiMi$i4fil@i§fu1 I ~ WASHINGTON, DC ?O??L " • · -c:J ::r

0028 20 I"- - ~ 1.

Cl -tO-;QO Po:~ • Cl Cortiltoai'GO ~ $0.00

Cl ~~. $0.00 ~~~ c:J F:e;;trletod Deft, - '"ftt;Ot)- ~ sr ) ~ (Endolnftment R n • '<ll J 't r-'1 $7 .t~- -

1"0la1Posto:r- F I ; . 04/24/2016 ) ~ . $13~.15- -Cl

1

JOHN KOSKINEN, Commissioner 1"- L Internal Kevenuc Service Office of Commissioner.

II II Constjtution Avenue. NW Washington, DC [20224]

ll.#ii"Pr·m ... -;-· ·\·~-,~ ... ~'it·. ·Wti:am~o !tV'·l·:!l

16----UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ARMED FORCES

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, and

Eric Jon Phelps,

Petitioners.

PETITION UNDER RULE 67(C) FOR A 28 USC § 1651 SPECIAL WRIT OF

MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF IN THE MA ITER OF

THE BREACH OF CONTRACT IN 1999 WITH REPEAL OF THE GLASS-

STEAGALL ACT DURING THE NATIONAL BANKING EMERGENCY OR

TIME OF WAR AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANDATES BY THE DE

FACTO COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, UNDER THE: HAGUE CONVENTION,

UNITED STATES ARMY FIELD MANUAL FOR CIVIL AFFAIRS

OPERATIONS, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, AND

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona Petitioner

c/o 315 FlatbushAvenue- PMB 102 Brooklyn, New York Zip code excepted (11217]


Eric Jon: Phelps, in esse Sui juris, in propria persona Petitioner

c/o 203 South Fort Zellers Road Newmanstown, Pennsylvania ZIP Code Excepted [17073]

Ph. 610-589-5300 Email: [email protected]

PETITIONERS

Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona c/o 315 Flatbush Avenue- PMB 102

Brooklyn, New York Zip code excepted [11217] Ph: 718-414-3760; Email: [email protected]

Eric Jon: Phelps~ in esse Sui juris, in propria persona c/o 203 South Fort Zellers Road

Newmanstown, Pennsylvania ZIP Code Excepted [17073] Ph. 610-589-5300 Email: [email protected]

PARTIES IN INTEREST

GENERAL MARK ALEXANDER MILLEY Chief of Staff of the United States Army

204 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 2031 0-0204

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, Commander in Chief: President of the United States of America

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington District of Columbia [20500]

JACOB JOSEPH LEW, Secretary of the United States Treasury --- Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington District of Columbia [20220]

JOHN KOSKINEN, Commissioner Intetnal Revenue Service Office of Commissioner,

11 11 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC [20224]

ROBERT DRUSKIN, Executive Chailman of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation

55 Water Street, 1-SL, NewYorkNew York [10041-0004]

Introduction

Relief Sought

A. Declaratory Judgment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

B. Mandamus of Courts with use of 50 USC App. Section 9, 17, 32

C. Mandamus of Trial Comt for pre-trial discovery

D. Mandamus of US Army Chief of Staff (COS)

Page

I

8

E. Mandamus of COS I CINC to safeguard government fmance and legal process

Statement of Facts 11

Issues Presented 19

A. Does the authodty of the Military Government presently extend jurisdiction over the govemment in the United States and civi I responsibility ... ?

B. Does the scope of military authority circumscribed by the necessities of the ongoing national emergency or time of war .. ?

C. Is there a contract between Petitioners and government of the United States?

D. Is there a breach of contract for Petitioners class resultant of the 1999 repeal of the 1933 Glass Steagall Act .. ?

E. Does the U.S. Anny Chief of Staffs authority over Civil Affairs Functions with civil agency( s ) ... ?

F. Does the present Military Government rrus-represent the martial process .. ?

Conclusion

Verifications

20

21-22

Combined APPENDIX with pages APX- 001 through APX - 153 ................ 23

ii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

USCA for the Armed Force Rule 67(c) for a special writ

Department of the Army Field Manual FM 41-10-62 Civil Affairs Operations

FM 4I-1 0-62 Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 Definitions a. Civil Affairs.

FM 41-10-62 Chapter I Paragraph 2 Defmitions d. Civil Emergency

FM 41-10-62 Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 Definitions- g. Militaf1l Government

FM 41-10-62 Chapter 5 THE ARMY IN THE COMMUNITY .. Paragraph 70. Martial Law

FM 41-10-62 Chapter I Paragraph 8. Application of International Law

FM 41-10-62 CHAPTER 2 CIVIL AFFAIRS FUNCTIONS Paragraph 11 Governmental Functions

FM 41-10-62 Page 17 - diagram for CIVIL AFFAIRS IN TIME PHASES HOSTILITIES- PEACETIME: RELATIONSHIP TO CIVIL GOVERNMENT (POLIT£CAL- ECONOMIC-SOCJAl MATTERS)-A PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MILITARY SUPPORTED BY OTHER DESIGNATED US AGENCIES

Statutes

28 usc §1651

28 usc §2201

10 U.S. Code §801 Defmitions- 9 The term "accuser"

18 U.S. Code §7-7

12 USC 95(a): 50 USC App. 5(b) still a National Emergency of Executive Order 2039 and 2040 by authorization of Congress by 12 USC 95(b)

The Emergency Powers Act of Sept. 14, 1976 PL 94-412 90 Stat. 1255, expressly retained 12 USC §95(a) with 50 USC Appendix §5(b)

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (50 U.S.C. 1701-1707), EBRA remains the law of the land over banking and commerce internationally cited by the Congressional Research Service Report to Congress 98-505 "National Emergency Powers" update September 18, 2001.

Glass Steagall Act.

Graham-Leach-Bliley Act.

iii

l.JS Constitution with Amendments

Treaties

Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV) of October 18, 1907, especially Section III Military Authority Over the Territory of the Hostile State Articles 42 through 56

Other Sources

The Law ofNations, by Emer de Vattel in 1758

Federal Register search "National Emergency" "Emergency Continuation"

Executive Order 2039 created the perpetual private trusts on March 6, 1933

Executive Order 2040 created the perpetual temporary Military Government on March 9, 1933

US Senate Report 93-549

Maryland Journal of International Law Vol. 3 Issue 2 Article 11 "Amendments to the Trading With the Enemy Act"

Congressional Research Service Rep011 to Congress 98-505 "National Emergency Powers" update September 18, 200 1

SPYHUNTER: The Secret History of German Intelligence by Michael Shrimpton, June Press 2014

Related Cases

Strunk v DTCC eta/ USCA 2nd Circuit 15-3199

Phelps v Obama eta! USCA 3rd Circuit 16-1453

iv

EXHIBIT C Petitioner on 29 October 2018 Writ of Mandamus filing was prevented based upon

the Memorandum by the Docket Clerk attached with my letter to the SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts


141 Harris Avenue

Lake luzerne, New York 12846


THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS

The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

1 FIRST STREET N.E.

Washington DC 20543

In Re: Christopher Earl Strunk and Harold William Van Allen SCOTUS Rule 20 Procedure Application for an

Extraordinary WRIT OF MANDAMUS APPLICATION taken from the 29 October 2018 denial of hearing

taken from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces


Undersigned along with Harold William Van Allen are the propria persona petitioners that hereby

make this emergency application for equity relief, having been denied on 29 October 2018 hearing from

the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of our 28 USC 1651 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and

Injunctive Relief inter alia preserving the 6 November 2018 Mid-Term Election Paper Ballots and

convening a Court of Inquiry pursuant to the letter and intent of the National Emergency Mandates

issued by the Commander-in-Chief, Donald John Trump; see the accompanying:

• ORIGINAL 29 October 2018 Memorandum by Kristen Haloj, USCAAF Docket Room Supervisor,

and

• Petition Original single sided with signatures at pages 31, thru 33 and the 333 pages Appendix,

• two (2) true and correct back and front printed copies

• Copy of the above Memorandum with the post-it phone number of DHS Attorney "Sara" having

been served w ith a copy at DHS Headquarters at noon today,

As undersigned confirms at Petition page 31, that the urgent relief sought is reasonable in that time

is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm were the relief not granted.

The Undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the for go-tAg is true and correct

under 28 USC 1746; Respectfully yours,

Dated: October 24 2018 Washington District of Columbia

Attachments

cc: Vice President Michael Pence OHS Office of General Counsel John M. M itnick Harold William Van Allen


141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ----

MEMORANDUM

Upon receipt and review of a petition produced by Mr. Christopher E. Strunk, in reference to paper ballots and alleged meddling in the mid-term general election, I informed Mr. Strunk that the Court of Criminal Appeals for the Armed Forces may not be the appropriate Court in which to file. The Court. is an independent tribunal established under Article I of the Constitution, which regularly interprets federal statutes. executive orders, and depanmental regulations. The Court also determines the applicability of constitutional provisions to members of the armed forces. Through its decisions, the Court has a significant impact on the state of discipline in the armed forces, military readiness, and the rights of service members. The Court plays an indispensable role in the military justice system.

-15~ .,. ~SleO OJ

Docket Room Supervisor

1

No. __________


__________________________________________________________________

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, and Harold William Van Allen, Petitioners.

__________________________________________________________________

PETITION WITH 28 USC §1651 FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANDATE(S) ISSUED BY THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, DONALD JOHN TRUMP FOR AN ORDER:

A. TO PRESERVE, UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE BY THIS COURT, ALL PAPER BALLOTS CAST ON 6 NOVEMBER 2018 BY U.S. CITIZEN VOTERS AT THE NATIONAL MID-TERM GENERAL ELECTION IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND THE SEVERAL STATES AND TERRITORIES; AND

B. TO CONVENE A TITLE 10 §935. ART. 135. COURT OF INQUIRY INTO FOREIGN MEDDLING DURING THE 6 NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION CYCLE; AND

C. TO ISSUE A REPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN; AND FOR

D. SUCH OTHER AND DIFFERENT RELIEF DEEMED NECESSARY. __________________________________________________________________

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, in propria persona 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York Zip code excepted [12846]


Harold William Van Allen in esse Sui juris, in propria persona 351 North Road Hurley New York 12443


2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................6

RELIEF SOUGHT ...............................................................................................10

PETITIONERS ....................................................................................................11

STATEMENT OF FACTS ..................................................................................12

ISSUES RAISED ................................................................................................28

CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................30

STRUNK PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT .....................................31

VAN ALLEN PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT...............................32

PETITION COMPLIANCE STATEMENT ......................................................33

APPENDIX FOR THE PETITION WITH 28 USC §1651 FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANDATE(S) ISSUED BY THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, DONALD JOHN TRUMP

DATE EXHIBIT PAGE

12 -Sep.-18 Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election APX 001

14 -Mar.-18

Americans for Innovation: Senior Executive Service (SES) is ~10,000 Deep State shadow government employees who are sabotaging the American Republic for the globalist agenda APX 009

3

4 -Apr.-18

American Intelligence Media (AIM) Plum Book (1980-2016) Analysis: Plum books hide SES employees in a blizzard of bad math and contradictory, nonsensical categories APX 022

11 -Apr.-18 American Intelligence Media (AIM) : TENTACLES OF SERCO STRANGLE AMERICA APX 037

11 -Apr.-18

SERCO U. S. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS (ibid) APX 062

4-Oct.-18

Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration’s Policy Toward China APX 080

22-Oct-18

STRUNK'S Absentee Ballot Warren County APX 093

22-Oct-18

VAN ALLEN'S Sample Ulster County Ballot APX 098

22-Oct-18

Selection of VAN ALLEN'S and STRUNK's New York State Court election Law cases APX 100

23-Jul-18

Michael T. McKibben's /Leader Technologies Inc. Miller Act cover letter to POTUS Donald J Trump re Serco Inc / SES theft of Software Patent APX 101

23-Jul-18

Michael T. McKibben's / Leader Technologies Inc. Miller Act Notice For Federal Work's Project 40 USC §3131 et seq. re Software Patent Theft APX 104

23-Oct-18

Washington State Courts Appellate Court Case Summary for Petition for Writ of Mandamus, James M. Miller v. Secretary of State, Kim Wyman No. 96235-9 filed on 28 August 2018 APX 127

28-Aug-18

Petition for Writ of Mandamus, James M. Miller v. Secretary of State, Kim Wyman No. 96235-9 with Exhibits A thru L APX 128

4

19-Jul-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit D Letter to President Trump by Governors Jay Inslee and Andrew Cuomo re ongoing Foreign Interference in the 2018 State Election Cycle APX 187

6-Jul-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit G Chart of Chief Electronic Voting Scammers connected to Electronic Voting Machine Foreign Interference. APX 199

18-Sep-15

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit H EPA Letter to Volkswagen AG re Notice of Software Violation APX 201

11-Jul-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit I US Senator Wyden: Paper Ballots and Audits are Essential to Secure American Elections Against Foreign Hackers APX 207

17-Jul-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit J MOTHERBOARD Report: PCANYWHERE Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software on Systems Sold to States APX 210

6-Aug-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit L 8/5/18 Professional Experience & Resume of Plaintiff James M. Miller - with 8/6/18 statement on System Security - Election & Voting - WA Secretary of State and 10/17/17 Fortune Magazine analysis "This Website Graded Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Samsung on Their Political Leanings" by Don Reisinger APX 224

6-Aug-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit L Statement on System Security - Election & Voting - WA Secretary of State APX 226

6-Aug-18

Special Note: No. 96235-9 re Exhibit L 10/17/17 Fortune Magazine analysis "This Website Graded Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Samsung on Their Political Leanings" by Don Reisinger APX 230

5

12-Oct-18

Response to Petition No. 96235-9, on October 12, 2018, REBECCA R. GLASGOW, WSBA 32886 Deputy Solicitor General maneuvered to postpone hearing until after 6 November 2018 APX 241

26-Jul-18

Washington Examiner: On 26 July 2018 House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) called for a ban on electronic voting systems in an interview that aired Thursday in Washington Examiner APX 265

31-Jul-18

On 31 July 2018 the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen Keynote Speech issued at the National Cyber-security Summit APX 266

13-Jul-17 Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity update APX 276

3-Jan-18

Statement by the Press Secretary on ending the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity Issued on: January 3, 2018 APX 281

1-Oct-18

Americans for Innovation Study Report update to the 15-Sept-2018 initial report: HILLARY CLINTON CONTROLS 50,000 FBI ENCRYPTION KEYS—PROVES MUELLER’S WITCH HUNT IS TREASONOUS (Re: ENTRUST) APX 282

1-Oct-18

TIMELINE: BILL & HILLARY CLINTON BEGAN ORCHESTRATING UNFETTERED ACCESS TO THE FBI’S ENCRYPTION KEYS IN 1993 (Re: ENTRUST) APX 290

13-Sep-18

ENTRUST (ENTU 1998-2009) 10-K, Customer, Partner, Director, Officer, Dependent, Subsidiary. Source: Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Edgar with Alpha Sort APX 308

24-Oct-18

THE HILL: Officials prepare for potential of claims of election interference BY JACQUELINE THOMSEN - 10/24/18 06:00 AM EDT APX 331

6

INTRODUCTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE That the honorable judges of this Court: Scott W.

Stucky (Chief Judge.); Margaret A. Ryan; Kevin A. Ohlson; John E. Sparks;

Gregory E. Maggs; are petitioned by Accusers defined by 10 USC 801-9 (1) for

offenses against nationals of the United States outside the jurisdiction of any nation

defined by 18 USC §7 -7 as if for special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the

United States using Court Rule 67(c) as to Civil Affairs (2) under the 12 USC §95(a)

amended 50 USC App. §5(b) ongoing emergency (3) with the Military Government

(4) U.S. Army duties in the Community under the Honorable Donald J. Trump

POTUS / Commander-in-Chief (CINC), as was defined by the clarity of the U.S.

Army Field Manual (FM) 41-10-1962 now amended into Civil Affairs Operations

1 10 USC §801 Definitions (9) The term “accuser” means a person who signs and swears to charges, any person who directs that charges nominally be signed and sworn to by another, and any other person who has an interest other than an official interest in the prosecution of the accused. 2 FM 41-10-1962 Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 Definitions a. Civil Affairs. Those phases of the activities of a commander which embrace the relationship between the military forces and the civil authorities and people in a friendly (including US home territory) or occupied area where military forces are present. In an occupied country or area this may include the exercise of executive, legislative, and judicial authority by the occupying power. 3 FM 41-10-1962 Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 Definitions d. Civil Emergency. Emergencies affecting public welfare as a result of enemy attack, insurrection, civil disturbance, earthquake, fire, flood, or other public disasters or equivalent emergencies which endanger life and property or disrupt the usual process of government. (Emphasis by Petitioners) 4 FM 41-10-1962 Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 Definitions- g. Military Government. Form of administration by which an occupying power exercises executive, legislative, and judicial authority over occupied territory.

7

FM 3-57 dated 31 October 2011 applies with Chapter 4 Section 52 as to the

civilian event of the early voting ongoing mid-term "elections" with the deadline of

November 6. 2018 that affect military operations (5) CINC warned of with the 12

September 2018 Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of

Foreign Interference in a United States Election (see APX 001 thru APX 008);

and

Further accordingly, as now applies with Civil Affairs Operations FM 3-57

is changed in keeping with the Hague and Geneva Conventions with related law, as

FM 41-10-1962 was used prior to the International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights (ICCPR) that adopted and opened for signature, ratification and

accession by the United Nations General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16

December 1966, with entry into force on 23 March 1976 in accordance with

Article 49 that does not apply within the United States per se; and

Further, ICCPR was adopted, with reservations by Canada in 1982

concurrent with its Constitution, without recourse in the United States in 1992, and

in the Russian Federation with its Constitution in 1992 without reservations; and

5 US Army FM 3-51 Chapter 4-52. Just as there are different categories of civilians, there are different categories of civilian events that may affect military operations. Some examples are planting and harvest seasons, elections, riots, and evacuations (both voluntary and involuntary). Likewise, there are military events that affect the lives of civilians in an AO. Some examples are combat operations, including indirect fires, deployments, and redeployments. CAO/CMO planners determine what events are occurring, and analyze the events for their political, economic, psychological, environmental, and legal implications.

8

Further, without even ICCPR protection posed on paper for U.S. Citizen

voters in this ongoing Mid-term 2018 election cycle - ICCPR does not apply

herein; and furthermore, in the absence of any expectation of due process of law

relief in any State and or Federal court to afford all voters national equal protection

of the law plus being subject to the complete and utter absence of a so-called

Justice Department (DOJ) with Attorney General Jeff Sessions (the Mr. Magoo of

our time) who is absent without leave; and DOJ operates a vast criminal enterprise

run by the 500 Senior Executive Service (SES) (6) member DOJ central committee

(see APX 009 thru APX 036) under the FISA warrant 'Robo-Signer'

6 The Senior Executive Service (SES) is a position classification in the civil service of the United States federal government, equivalent to general officer or flag officer ranks in the U.S. Armed Forces; created in 1979 when the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 went into effect under President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Stansfield Turner. According to the Office of Personnel Management, the SES was designed to be a corps of executives, who may not be U.S. Citizens or even qualify under a rigorous security background check, selected for their leadership qualifications, serving in key positions just below the top Presidential appointees as a link between them and the rest of the Federal (civil service) workforce. SES positions are considered to be above the GS-15 level of the General Schedule, and below Level III of the Executive Schedule. Career members of the SES ranks are eligible for the Presidential Rank Awards program. Up to 10% of SES positions can be filled as political appointments rather than by career employees. About half of the SES is designated "Career Reserved", which can only be filled by career employees. The other half is designated "General", which can be filled by either career employees or political appointments as desired by the administration. Due to the 10% limitation, most General positions are still filled by career appointees. Senior level employees of several agencies are exempt from the SES but have their own senior executive positions; these include the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, Transportation Security Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, Government Accountability Office, Members of the Foreign Service, and government corporations. Unlike the General Schedule (GS) grades, SES pay is determined at agency discretion within certain parameters, and there is no locality pay adjustment. The minimum pay level for the SES is set at 120 percent of the basic pay for GS-15 Step 1 employees ($126,148 for 2018).

9

Rod Jay Rosenstein who affords silence for Christopher Wray, Gina Haspel, and

General Paul M. Nakasone, USA (who assumed NSA command from Admiral

Mike Rogers, USN) for the fifth Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Daniel

Coats who was sworn in on March 16, 2017 (who seems pre-occupied to hide

under the National Security rubric the $21 trillion of off balance sheet debt for a

total $52 Trillion of indebtedness under the 85 year bankruptcy), all ignore AAG

Rosenstein with his henchmen of the Chinese / Globalist intelligence community

that includes Senator Diane Feinstein and other Congress persons whose staffers

such as the Pakistani Awan Brothers are of the 10000 plus members of the

constitutionally questionable fourth branch of government listed in the Plum Book,

the Senior Executive Service and post employment SES Association who serve

quid pro quo for SERCO INC. (see APX 037 thru APX 079), and in effect warned

of in Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration’s Policy Toward

China issued on October 4, 2018 at the The Hudson Institute of Washington, D.C.

(see APX 080 thru APX 092), stated quote:

VP Pence: The Chinese Communist Party is rewarding or coercing American businesses, movie studios, universities, think tanks, scholars, journalists, and local, state, and federal officials. And worst of all, China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections. To put it bluntly, President Trump’s leadership is working; and China wants a different American President.

10

There can be no doubt: China is meddling in America’s democracy. As President Trump said just last week, we have, in his words, “found that China has been attempting to interfere in our upcoming [midterm] election[s].” Our intelligence community says that “China is targeting U.S. state and local governments and officials to exploit any divisions between federal and local levels on policy. It’s using wedge issues, like trade tariffs, to advance Beijing’s political influence.”

And as such with this said, Petitioners seek available remedy, afford fair notice

only in this remaining true Article 1 court to obtain a Writ of Mandamus, and

based upon our nearly forty years experience in the State and Federal judicial

system along with SCOTUS, all appear to remain politically and ideological

compromised.

RELIEF SOUGHT

Petitioners seek relief with 28 USC §1651 for a writ of mandamus

with injunctive equity relief pursuant to the national emergency mandate(s) issued

by the Commander-In-Chief, Donald John Trump for an order:

A. To preserve, until further notice by this court, all paper ballots cast on 6

November 2018 by U.S. Citizen voters at the national mid-term general election

in the State of New York and the several states and territories; and

B. To convene a Title 10 §935. Art. 135. court of inquiry (7) into foreign meddling

during the 6 November 2018 election cycle; and

7 Title 10 §935. Art. 135. Courts of inquiry

11

C. To issue a report for the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M.

Nielsen; and for

D. Such other and different relief deemed necessary.

PETITIONERS

1. Petitioner Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris (Strunk), in propria

(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.

(b) A court of inquiry consists of three or more commissioned officers. For each court of inquiry the convening authority shall also appoint counsel for the court.

(c) Any person subject to this chapter whose conduct is subject to inquiry shall be designated as a party. Any person subject to this chapter or employed by the Department of Defense who has a direct interest in the subject of inquiry has the right to be designated as a party upon request to the court. Any person designated as a party shall be given due notice and has the right to be present, to be represented by counsel, to cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence.

(d) Members of a court of inquiry may be challenged by a party, but only for cause stated to the court.

(e) The members, counsel, the reporter, and interpreters of courts of inquiry shall take an oath to faithfully perform their duties.

(f) Witnesses may be summoned to appear and testify and be examined before courts of inquiry, as provided for courts-martial.

(g) Courts of inquiry shall make findings of fact but may not express opinions or make recommendations unless required to do so by the convening authority.

(h) Each court of inquiry shall keep a record of its proceedings, which shall be authenticated by the signatures of the president and counsel for the court and forwarded to the convening authority. If the record cannot be authenticated by the president, it shall be signed by a member in lieu of the president. If the record cannot be authenticated by the counsel for the court, it shall be signed by a member in lieu of the counsel. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 76.)

In subsection (a), the words “Secretary concerned” are substituted for the words “Secretary of a Department”.

In subsection (b), the word “commissioned” is inserted for clarity. The word “consists” is substituted for the words “shall consist”.

In subsection (c), the word “has” is substituted for the words “shall have”. In subsection (e), the words “or affirmation” are omitted as covered by the definition of the

word “oath” in section 1 of title 1. In subsection (g), the word “may” is substituted for the word “shall”. In subsection (h), the word “If” is substituted for the words “In case”.

12

persona, with place for service at 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York Zip

Code 12846 Ph: 518-416-8743; Email: [email protected]

(hereinafter "Petitioner" among the "Petitioners");

2. Strunk is a Vietnam Era Veteran having served honorably in the United

States Air Force with rank of E-5 from December 7, 1966 thru December 6, 1972.

3. Strunk has a Public U.S. Citizen registration to vote in Warren County at

New York's Federal Mid-term General Election scheduled for 6 November 2018,

and Strunk cast a vote by mail on 22 October 2018 (see APX 093 thru APX 097);

and

4. Petitioner Harold William Van Allen in esse sui juris, in propria persona

(Van Allen) with place for service at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12443

Ph: 845-389-4366; Email: [email protected] (hereinafter "Petitioner"

among the "Petitioners"); and

5. Van Allen is a service related disabled Vietnam Era Veteran having served

honorably in the United States Navy with rank of O-2 - June 1972 thru June 1978.

6. Van Allen has a Public U.S. Citizen registration to vote in the Ulster County

New York's Federal Mid-term General Election scheduled for 6 November 2018

with the candidates shown in Exhibit (see APX 098 thru APX 099).

STATEMENT OF FACTS

7. That Petitioners are aware of what General and then CINC Dwight D.

13

Eisenhower meant as he left Office on Jan. 17, 1961, warned the world about

danger for tyranny arising from the Congressional Military-Industrial Complex.(8)

8 Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961. Quote:

"My fellow Americans: Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the

responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II. We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars

among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III. Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep

the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle -- with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

14

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV. A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty,

ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

15

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V. Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's

future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI. Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours,

ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war -- as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years -- I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII.

So -- in this my last good night to you as your President -- I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

16

8. Petitioners have been involved in dozens of State (see APX 100) and

Federal election / suffrage rights related cases ourselves and by our associates for

the sake of brevity some of which are listed without a description:

In Re: Schulz etal v. The State of New York etal. NDNY 95cv133 (CGC)

with Dr. Walker F. Todd Ph.D. Esq. as counsel for Plaintiffs;

In Re: STRUNK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS et al (1:09-cv-01295) (NG)

In Re: Strunk v. US Dept of Housing Urban Development etal. EDNY

99cv6480 (NG)

In Re: Loeber etal v. Spargo etal. NDNY 04cv1193 (LEK)

In Re: Forjone etal v California etal. WDNY 06cv0080 / NDNY 06cv01002

In Re: USA v NYS Board of Elections etal. NDNY 04cv0263 (GLS)

In Re: Schulz etal. v State of New York etal. NDNY 07cv00943 (LEK) file a

very large set of multidistrict cases one in each State of the several states

with a separate Plaintiff in each State, therein challenging the

You and I -- my fellow citizens -- need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration: Source: Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040 See https://youtu.be/orEurY6HdXU and text at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_centuryeisenhower001.

17

unconstitutional use of electronic voting rather than paper ballots with a

chain of custody for counting and tally and for which the corrupt civil courts

buried the cases and terrorized Robert Schulz for the past 6 years;

In Re: STRUNK V. C.I.A. EDNY Civil Action No. 08cv01196 (ARR)

In Re: Jah Thomas, Basil Guilavigui and Christopher Earl Strunk v

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York etal. DNY2007cv01171 (ARR)

In Re: Strunk v NYS Board of Elections etal. NYS Kings Cty Sup. 6500-11

In Re: Strunk v. DOS et al. DCD 08-cv-2234 (RJL)

In Re: STRUNK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF

THE CENSUS et al (1:09-cv-01295) (RJL)

In Re: Strunk v New York State Board of Elections, et al., Index No. 08-

CV4289 (US Dist Ct, EDNY, Oct. 28, 2008, Ross, J.)

In Re: Apr 24, 2016 - Strunk v DTCC etal USCA 2nd Circuit 15-3199.

Strunk v DTCC, Robert Druskin etal SDNY 15cv6817.

In Re: STRUNK v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA etal. NYND 16-cv-

1496 (BKS/ DJS) was a challenge to the vote fraud involving illegal voters

in California and New York to no avail in anticipation of results obtained by

the Presidential 2016 Election Integrity Commission ordered 11 May 2017

that Judge Sannes dismissed the case without prejudice on 15 May 2017.

9. Our compatriot engineer, Michael T. McKibben founder of Americans For

18

Innovation (AFI) and Leader Technologies Inc., is the actual inventor of social

network scaling software that was stolen from the SERCO INC. controlled U.S.

Patent Office and its agents for Google, Facebook and other social network

platforms; and

10. Further, AFI investigation has proven the theft has affected every election

cycle -since 2008, and that since Sep. 29, 1999 started when the C.I.A. began

investing in hardware and software companies, thus essentially nationalizing

largely in secret, America's emerging digital infrastructure; and

11. Further, having exhausted available remedy Mr. McKibben filed a Miller

Act claim with CINC Trump (see APX 101 thru APX 126); and

12. Further, based upon information and belief, in that the theft gave the C.I.A.

an unprecedented and unaccountable ability to spy on everyone without a warrant,

and given the C.I.A. theft has created government liability under the Miller Act

(40 U.S.C. §§ 3131-3134) evidenced by voluminous spreadsheet summaries

compiled by Leader Technologies, Inc. within the last week, available to this court

upon request, are the contracts acquired by SERCO INC. between 20 September

2005 and 11 May 2018 (9) with the Department of Commerce (DOC), the U.S.

9 Serco-All-Federal-Agency-Prime-Contracts-between-Sep-30-2005-to-May-01-2018-USAspending-May-11-2018.

Serco-DOD-Prime-Contracts-between-Aug-14-2006-to-Apr-01-2018-USAspending-May-11-2018.csv

Serco-OPM-Contracts-between-Nov-28-2007-to-Nov-20-2015-USAspending-May-11-2018.csv

Serco-DUNS-014387489-Department-of-Homeland-Security-DHS-between-Jan-25-2008-to-Jan-25-2018- accessed-May-12-2018.csv

19

Office of Personnel Management (OPM), DOC Bureau of Census (BOC) DOC

Patent Trademark Office (PTO), Department of Defense (DOD), Department of

Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) and other too

numerous prime contracts too numerous to list herein but germane as to espionage;

and

13. That based upon information and belief as a matter of foreign meddling and

interference during the 6 November 2018 election cycle, there are no bid SERCO

INC. contracts with Federal entities, since 2005 with reference to Footnote #9, that

among other egregious exceptions to law are in violation of the Sherman and

Robinson Patman Antitrust Acts that with impunity have afforded access and

opportunity by Foreign enemies of the United States of America and its member

States and Territories to conduct the crime of espionage by foreign enemies, and

14. Further that proof of these allegations as to spying have in part been

established judicially in several cases heard before SES member Richard J. Leon, a

District Court Judge in the District of Columbia, who at least regards proven

egregious 4th amendment spying violations as unconstitutional, and

15. Further the said contracts summarized at Footnote #9 also involves the huge

Serco-Federal-Acquisitions-Service-FAS-between-Apr-20-2008-to-May-01-2018-USAspending-May-11-2018.csv

Serco-DOS-Prime-Contracts-between-Dec-29-2011-to-Dec-28-2015-USAspending-May-11-2018.csv

Serco-DOD-Subcontracts-between-Feb-04-2011-to-Mar-20-2018-USAspending-May-11-2018.csv

20

DOD and OPM personnel file theft disclosed in 2015 (10) affording jurisdiction of

this Court over the Petitioners' Petition as a probable cause legal standard of proof

above mere reasonable suspicion that the SES components of Government serving

SERCO Inc., run by the Queen's Privy Council coordinated with the People's

Republic of China (PRC) Communist Central Committee, and of course ALL the

entities through their SES managers working with the SERCO INC. contracts

referenced in Footnote #9 thereby actually facilitate election tampering in the

United States and elsewhere that creates a civil responsibility properly based upon

a major degree of military intrusion into the field of government; and

16. Further correspondingly, the scope of military authority under Civil Affairs

Operations FM 3-57, is circumscribed here by the necessities of the ongoing

national emergency or time of war with martial law provisions of the 12 USC

§95(a) amended 50 USC App. §5(b) for extraordinary circumstances since March

6, 1933 beyond the control capability of normal government officials in application

of International Law(11); and whose duty falls upon the U.S. Army Chief of Staff's

10 https://www.opm.gov/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-incidents/ e.g. Earlier in 2015, OPM discovered that the personnel data of 4.2 million current and former Federal government employees had been stolen. ... may also have been impacted by the separate but related incident involving personnel records.

11 FM 41-10-1962 Chapter 1 Paragraph 8. Application of International Law. (a.) International law is usually regarded as having two branches, one dealing with the peaceful relations between states and the other concerned with armed hostilities between states. This division is not, however, absolute, and there are many facets of international relations that are difficult to regard as belonging to the law of peace or the law of war. Both branches as well as the undefined grey

21

authority over Civil Affairs Functions with civil agency(s) and the cabinet of the

Commander-in-chief, with alleged dereliction of duty inter alia, for effective civil

government, public finance, legal due process (12) .

area in between apply to civil affairs relations. The law of peace deals with such matters as recognition of states and governments, jurisdiction, nationality, diplomatic protocol, the prerequisites for and construction of international agreements, and, generally, the practices and standards observed by friendly states in their mutual relations. Evidence of the law of peace is to be found in law making treaties, the decisions of international and national judicial bodies, the writings of jurists, diplomatic correspondence, and other documentary material concerning the practice of states. The law of peace is particularly relevant to define the rights and obligations of a military force that is deployed in the territory of an allied state not only where there is a civil affairs agreement, but also where there is no applicable agreement or with respect to matters on which such agreement is silent. (Emphasis by Petitioners)

(b.) The law of war governs such matters as the conduct of hostilities on land, in the sea, and in the air; the status and treatment of persons affected by hostilities, such as POW'S, the sick and wounded, and civilian persons; the occupation of enemy territory, flags of truce, armistices and surrender agreements, neutrality, and war crimes. The law of war is derived from two principal sources, law making treaties, such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and custom, a body of unwritten law that is firmly established by the practice of nations and well defined by recognized authorities on international law. Ordinarily, a provision of an international agreement is binding on a state only to the extent that it has consented to be bound. However, a humanitarian principle enunciated in a law making treaty is binding. (Emphasis by Petitioners)

(e.) Of these' agreements, the NATO Status of Forces Agreement is particularly significant because of the precedent it has established concerning the law applicable to visiting military forces when they are in the territory of a friendly state. The Hague Regulations are important because they are regarded as declaratory of law applicable between belligerents. The 1949 Conventions supplement the Hague Regulations, which by their literal terns applied only to a "war" between parties signatory thereto, by broadening the scope of the Treaty law to cover not only "war" but also "any other armed conflict" and "any partial or total occupation," involving their signatories (see FM 27-10). An international agreement of particular significance to CA personnel is the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. The United States became a signatory to this agreement at the Hague in 1954. This Convention outlines the measures which armed forces shall take in the preservation of historical, cultural, and scientific properties in any enemy territory. As CA personnel will have principal responsibility for measures to be taken concerning cultural property, they should be thoroughly familiar with the legal obligations of the United States respecting artistic objects, archives, monuments, shrines, and other types of cultural property. (Emphasis by Petitioners) 12 FM 41-10-62 CHAPTER 2 CIVIL AFFAIRS FUNCTIONS Paragraph 11 Governmental Functions. Included in this grouping of functions are those dealing with matters customarily involving governmental activity or control. The general areas of concern include the organization

22

and conduct of local government, political activities; review, advice, or correction of civil officials in accordance with competent directives, and implementation of policy decisions with respect to control or other relationships with government in the area of operations.

(a.) Civil Government. This function is concerned with the structure and conduct of local government. It encompasses methods of establishing legislative and executive agencies from national to local levels and the processes of these agencies in the administration of civil government. Included are such considerations as political. parties, eligibility for franchise, elections, tenure, and all other aspects of the development and operation of the apparatus of government. Commanders having area responsibility, their staffs, and CA units are charged, as appropriate, with

(1) Surveying governmental organization at all levels.

(2) Surveying lines of authority and influence having impact on political matters.

(3) Analyzing effectiveness of existing agencies of government or social control.

(4) Studying effectiveness of governmental officials and employees and of other community leaders; removing persons who are inimical to the United States or who are not in sympathy with its policies and objectives, and securing the appointment of leaders who will further desired programs.

(5) Negotiating to gain support or cooperation for United States forces.

(6) Recommending organization, functioning, staffing, and authority of agencies of government or social control.

(7) Advising, conducting liaison with, supervising, controlling, or replacing organs of government.

(8) Participating on joint commissions, committees, or councils concerned with governmental affairs.

(b.) Legal. This function is concerned with the legal system of the area and the application of international law in CA operations. Commanders having CA area responsibility, their staffs, and CA units are charged, as appropriate with-

(1) Translation of the legal aspect of CA operations into plans and directives.

(2) Analysis and interpretation of the civil and criminal laws of the territory, particularly restraints imposed upon the civil populace.

(3) Study of the organization of the judicial system including determination of legal status and jurisdiction of civil courts and law.

(4) Review of the local organization of the bar and determination of reliability of its members.

(5) Examination of locally accepted forms of judicial procedure including rules of evidence and rights of the accused.

(6) Assistance to commanders and staffs in the preparation of proclamations, ordinances, orders and directives, and as otherwise may be required.

23

(7) The establishment of necessary civil affairs tribunals and other judicial and administrative agencies, including their number, types, jurisdiction, procedures, and delegation of appointing authority.

(8) The closure or reopening of local tribunals, including courts, boards, and commissions; their jurisdiction, organization and procedure, and the class of cases triable therein.

(9) Recommendations concerning the suspension or abrogation of laws and procedural rules applicable to local courts.

(10) Recommendations concerning the alteration, suspension, or promulgation of laws to include civil legislation for the government of the area in which military forces are deployed. It may be necessary to deny enforcement effect to local legislation or to adopt new laws essential to the control of the area in question and the protection of U.S. forces. Such legislation must conform to applicable provisions of U.S. law and international law as, for example, the 1949 Geneva Civilian Convention.

(11) Supervision of the administration of civil and criminal laws by local officials.

(12) Provision of members for civil affairs tribunals.

(13) Review or administrative examination of cases tried in CA courts before referral to higher headquarters for final review.

(14) Arrangements for transmittal of civilian claims against the United States to the proper agency. (f.) Public Finance. This function is of vast importance in the conduct of economic welfare and economic stabilization measures and assists in reducing support contributions by the United States. It includes control, supervision, and audit of fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and the banking agencies and affiliates. It is essential that the function be performed in an integrated and uniform manner within each national area. Commanders having area responsibility, their staffs, and CA units may be charged with tasks such as: (1) Analysis of taxation systems and other sources of revenue, governmental expenditures, and estimates of adequacy of public funds for performance of governmental functions.

(2) Review of public laws and agencies regulating banking and financing.

(3) Analysis of financial structures including types and conditions of financial institutions.

(4) Analysis of types and amounts of circulating currencies, acceptance by population of such currencies, and current foreign exchange rates.

(5) Recommendations as to designation of type of circulating local currency.

(6) Recommendations as to provisions for military currency.

(7) Recommendations as to establishment of currency exchange rates.

(8) Establishment and enforcement of restrictions on exportation of currencies.

(9) Recommendations for control of foreign exchange.

24

17. Further, in addition Mr. McKibben has provided a copy of the Washington

State Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Mandamus, James M. Miller v. Secretary

of State, Kim Wyman No. 96235-9 filed on 28 August 2018 (Petition No. 96235-

9), to safeguard paper ballots cast in the Federal Mid-term General Election

scheduled for 6 November 2018, shown in Exhibit (see APX 127 thru APX 240)

for relief to:

(1) eliminate electronic voting systems in Washington and require hand tabulation of ballots, (2) implement in-person voting with fingerprint verification, and (3) require “bipartisan groups” (rather than election officials) to process and tabulate ballots, all for the 2018 general election and future elections.

18. Further therein Petition 96235-9 Exhibit D (see APX 186), on July 16 2018

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo joined with Washington State Governor Jay

Inslee (that arguendo defer their ineffectual individual State authority / power over

the election process to Federal Jurisdiction) demand that CINC Trump protect the

(10) Establishment of controls over budget, taxation, expenditures, and public funds and determination of appropriate fiscal accounting procedures.

(11) Reestablishment or revision of taxation systems in accordance with policy directives.

(12) Liquidation, reorganization, opening, or closing of banks.

(13) Supervision over credit and provisions for credit needs.

(14) Regulation or supervision of governmental fiscal agencies, banks, credit cooperatives, and other financial institutions.

(15) Recommendations for advances of funds to governmental or private financial institutions.

(16) Recommendations as to emergency declaration of debt suspensions for specific types of debts.

(17) Recommendations for protection of public and private financial institutions and safeguarding funds, securities, and financial records.

25

electoral process from Foreign interference with the Federal Mid-term General

Election cycle scheduled for 6 November 2018; and

19. Further, on 26 July 2018 House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin

Nunes (R-Calif.) called for a ban on electronic voting systems in an interview that

aired Thursday in Washington Examiner (see APX 265); quote

"The one thing we've been warning about for many, many years on the Intelligence committee is about the electronic voting systems," Nunes told Hill.TV's Buck Sexton, who sat with the lawmaker on Wednesday. "Those are really dangerous in my opinion, and should not be used. In California — at least in the counties that I represent — they do not use an electronic system," he continued. "I think anybody that does that, and that's communicating over the web, it's going to be a challenge. So you have to make sure that you limit that as much as possible, and we need a paper trail so that you can go back in case you have to do a manual recount," he said. In February, a DHS cybersecurity officials said that Russia had “in a small number of states in 2016" and warned California and 21 other states that Russia attempted to breach their systems.

20. Further yet to wit, on 31 July 2018 the Department of Homeland Security

Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen issued at the National Cyber-security Summit by her

Keynote Speech pledging to safeguard the Federal Mid-term General Election

scheduled for 6 November 2018 from foreign interference (see APX 266); and

21. That in response to Petition No. 96235-9, on October 12, 2018, REBECCA

R. GLASGOW, WSBA 32886 Deputy Solicitor General maneuvered to

postponed hearing until after 6 November 2018, in CONCLUSION (see APX 262)

26

alleged that quote:

"The Petition for Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus does not state a claim for relief because it does not identify any lawful basis for mandamus. The Secretary of State respectfully asks the Court to dismiss the petition with prejudice."

22. That following the 15 December 2016 filing of Strunk's election law case

STRUNK v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA etal. NYND 16-cv-1496 (BKS/ DJS)

dismissal without prejudice on 15 May 2017, that coincided with the President

Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order on 11 May 2017, establishing the

Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Vice President Mike

Pence chairs the Commission, and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach serves as

the vice chair, see the time line at APX 276, and in which members of the

Commission sabotaged the inquiry with court cases that resulted in cancellation of

the inquiry on 3 January 2018 (see APX 281).

23. That on 1 October 2018, Michael T. McKibben and his researchers at

American for Innovation, Leader Technologies, Inc and American Intelligence

Media update the 15 September 2018 report inter alia on electronic espionage and

foreign interference in the current 2016 Election cycle titled HILLARY CLINTON

CONTROLS 50,000 FBI ENCRYPTION KEYS—PROVES MUELLER’S WITCH

HUNT IS TREASONOUS and involving the foreign controlled entity ENTRUST

(see APX 282).

24. Importantly, the Report shown starting at APX 282 explains the TIMELINE:

27

for how BILL & HILLARY CLINTON BEGAN ORCHESTRATING

UNFETTERED ACCESS TO THE FBI’S ENCRYPTION KEYS IN 1993 for the

PRC etal. in regards to ENTRUST and foreign espionage starts at APX 290.

25. That Michael T. McKibben of Leader Technologies, Inc. provided Strunk on

13 September 2018 his research done into the ENTRUST entity at the Securities

Exchange Commission Edgar web facility to determine all the overlapping

potential espionage / interference connections using an (ENTU 1998-2009) 10-K,

Customer, Partner, Director, Officer, Dependent, Subsidiary (see APX 308).

26. That germane to this 2018 Election Cycle meddling / interference danger

that is associated with ENTRUST etal., especially the psychological warfare intent

of foreign interference in the ongoing election cycle, is the 24 October 2018 THE

HILL article: Officials prepare for potential of claims of election interference by

Jacqueline Thomsen (see APX 331).

27. That Petitioners based upon our New York experience (especially since the

Clinton's PRC / Maoist crime machine moved here in the 1990s), allege that PRC

national Jack Ma, the richest person on the PRC Central Committee, who had asset

stripped ROC / Taiwan Industry to the PRC Mainland, and as the CEO of the

PRC's Alibaba propaganda organization (13) just purchased 28,000 acres of New

York Adirondack forest from the International Paper Company with the blessing of

13 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny-news-jack-ma-alibaba-stepping-down-20180910-story.html

28

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and that a Court Inquiry would be fruitful.

28. Based upon Petitioners experience, information and belief, the Indonesian

poseur defacto President Barry Soetoro, Soebarkah, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama

is a member of the Senior Executive Service from his time working for the Central

Intelligence Agency at Business International Corporation as a non US Citizen,

and as a SES member Indonesian Citizen who questionably issued Executive Order

13714 of December 15, 2015 Strengthening the Senior Executive Service.

ISSUES RAISED

Petitioners raise a series of troubling issues that are to be properly resolved

in this Court related to 10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal

law (14) and or 10 U.S.C. 333 - Interference with State and Federal law, and as

14 §253.1 Interference with State and Federal law. The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall

take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it-

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15 , §333; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, §1076(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2404 ; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1068(a)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 325 ; renumbered §253, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497 .)

29

would apply to the application and administration of 50 USC 212: Confiscation of

property employed to aid insurrection (15).

That these troubling issues require a court inquiry that derive from the

purpose and use of The Sedition Act of 1918 (Pub.L. 65–150, 40 Stat. 553, enacted

May 16, 1918) that was an Act of the United States Congress that extended

the Espionage Act of 1917 to cover a broader range of offenses that Petitioners

contend is related to the subject 2018 Election cycle foreign interference in the

broader context of the Constitutionality of the Senior Executive Service per se that

was created by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, (October 13, 1978, Pub.L.

95–454, 92 Stat. 1111) (CSRA), that reformed the civil service of the United States

federal government, partly in response to the Watergate scandal, and in which

CSRA questionably varied from the requirement of the Administrative Procedures

Act (APA) from the due process standpoint and, in which CSRA abolished the

U.S. Civil Service Commission and distributed its functions primarily among three

15 §212. Confiscation of property employed to aid insurrection Whenever during any insurrection against the Government of the United States, after the

President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the power vested in the marshals by law, any person, or his agent, attorney, or employee, purchases or acquires, sells or gives, any property of whatsoever kind or description, with intent to use or employ the same, or suffers the same to be used or employed in aiding, abetting, or promoting such insurrection or resistance to the laws, or any person engaged therein; or being the owner of any such property, knowingly uses or employs, or consents to such use or employment of the same, all such property shall be lawful subject of prize and capture wherever found; and it shall be the duty of the President to cause the same to be seized, confiscated, and condemned.

30

new agencies: the Office of Personnel Management, the Merit Systems Protection

Board, and the Federal Labor Relations Authority, and that has taken over as a

foreign controlled fourth branch of government unconstitutionally.

CONCLUSION

Petitioners have been here previously on a related election issue during the

2016 cycle, and to the extent that Christopher Blaise Garvey is now on the 2018

Ballot in New York for its Attorney General otherwise he would be here too.

However in this 2018 cycle, we have exhausted our available remedies below in

both the State and Federal civil system to no avail under the continuing emergency

government, and because time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm

that will permanently impact the entirety of our fellow citizens of each of the

States of the several States and the ability of the limited republic of the United

States of America to continue, we beseech this Court for the good of the entire

country to grant the relief sought; and to the extent that there are Five states in the

U.S. — Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, New Jersey, and Delaware that run

their elections using direct recording electronic machines (DREs) only each must

be ordered under the Help America to Vote Act to provide Paper Ballots

accordingly to serve our Commander-in Chief during this time of upheaval with

the special notice to the danger posed by the warning given by The Hill shown at

APX 331 that Officials prepare for potential for claims of election interference.


STATEOFNEWYORK ) ) ss.

COUNTY OF WARREN )

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworu, depose and say under penalty of peijury:

I have read the foregoing Petition and Appendix Exhibits marked APX 001 thru APX 333 under 28 USC §1651 and related law for a writ of mandamus and injunctive equity relief pw·suant to the national emergency mandate(s) issued by the commander-in-chief, Donald John Trump for an order:


J3. TO CONVENE A TITLE 10 §935. ART. 135. COURT OF INQUIRY INTO FOREIGN MEDDLING DURING THE 6 NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION CYCLE; AND

C. TO ISSUE A REPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY KIRSTJEN M. N1ELSEN; AND FOR

D. SUCH OTHER AND DIFFERENT RELIEF DEEMED NECESSARY.

Whereas afjirmant Petitioner is an Accuser defmed by 10 USC 801-9 for offenses against nationals of the United States outside the jurisdiction of any nation defined by 18 USC §7 -7 as if for special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States using Comi

Subscribed and Sworn to before me This ~day of October 2 18

(

Rule 67(c) as to Civil Affairs under the 12 USC §95(a) amended 50 USC App. §5(b) ongoing emergency with the Military Government U.S. Army duties in the Community under the Honorable Donald J. Trump POTUS I Commander-in-Chief (CINC), as is defined by the U.S. Atmy Field Manual (FM) now amended into Civil Affairs Operations FM 3-57 dated 31 October 20 11 applies with Chapter 4 Section 52 as to the civilian event of the early voting ongoing mid-term "elections" with the deadline of 6 November 2018 that affect military operations CINC warned of with the 12 September 2018 Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election and that time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm; and

Aftirmant knows the contents thereof apply to me by misapplication and administration of laws and that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true, am available for testimony. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd

parties, books and records, and personal @e.C Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

31

KIMBERLY A. ROSS Notary Public, State of New York

warren Co. #01R06303916 1 Commission Expires May 19, 2o0lil


STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.

COUNTY OF ULSTER )

Accordingly, I, Harold William Van Allen, being duly swam, depose and say under penalty of pe1:jury:

I have read the foregoing Petition and Appendix Exhibits mru·ked APX 001 thru APX 333 under 28 USC § 1651 and related law for a writ of mandamus and injunctive equity relief pursuant to the national emergency mandate(s) issued by the commander-in-chief, Donald John Trump for an order:


B. TO CONVENE A TITLE 10 §935. ART. 135. COURT OF INQUIRY INTO FOREIGN MEDDLING DURING THE 6 NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION CYCLE; AND

C. TO ISSUE A REPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN; AND FOR

D. SUCH OTHER AND DIFFERENT RELIEF DEEMED NECESSARY.

Whereas affirmant Petitioner is an Accuser defined by 1 0 USC 801-9 for offenses against nationals of the United States outside the jurisdiction of any nation defined by 18 USC §7 -7 as if for special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States using Cotu·t

Subscribed and Sworn to before me This ~day of October 2018

}~It~~ Notary Public 5"//+T{ tft F Al£k) Yb~ /c

Rule 67(c) as to Civil Affairs under the 12 USC §95(a) amended 50 USC App. §5(b) ongoing emergency with the Military Government U.S. Anny duties in the Community under the Honorable Donald J. Trump POTUS I Commander-in-Chief (CINC), as is defined by the U.S. Army Field Manual (FM) now amended into Civil Affairs Operations FM 3-57 dated 31 October 20] J applies with Chapter 4 Section 52 as to the civiliru1 event of the eady voting ongoing mid-term ''elections" with the deadline of 6 November 2018 that affect military operations CINC warned of with the 12 September 2018 Executive Order on imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event o{ Foreign Intederence tn a United States Election Cerrain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign lnterfi;rence in a United Stales Election and that time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm; and

Affirmaot knows the contents thereof apply to me by misapplication and administration of laws and that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters T believe it to be true, am available for testimony. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd

pruties, books and records, and personal kno g

aroJd William Van Allen in esse Sui juris AU Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

F/Jif<.LfAJ<£ C . ((;:; /JtNOtf 32

Q[.;../J-l-1 r-1 to 1 IJ [) u 7Cif'i ~ <; CCJu A.J /Y (?2.C- #o lPJtSob lt:ttl/ co~m, t>MW ~/1~£s J-v, IV£ 13 0< () ;;l.;J..

10287 words


No. __ _


In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, and Harold William Van Allen,

Petitioners.

As required by Rule , the Undersigned certifies that the PETITION WITH 28 USC

§ 1651 FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTION EQUITY RELIEF IN

THE MATTER OF FOREIGN MEDDLING DURING THE 6 NOVEI\ffiER 2018

ELECTION CYCLE; contains 10287 words including the Petition Text and

Footnotes, excluding the parts of the petition that are exempted by rules, and uses

Times New Roman font with 14 Point type in the Text and 12 Point type in

Footnotes.

The undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is

true and correct under 28 USC § 17 46:

Dated: Octobe/21. 2018

Brooklyn, New York

LlHFI8ftm er Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris, 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846

Ph: 518-416-8743; Email: [email protected] All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ARMED FORCES __________________________________________________________________

In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, and Harold William Van Allen, Petitioners.

__________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX

FOR THE PETITION WITH 28 USC §1651 FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

AND INJUNCTIVE EQUITY RELIEF PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL

EMERGENCY MANDATE(S) ISSUED BY THE COMMANDER-IN-

CHIEF, DONALD JOHN TRUMP

APX 001

EXECUTIVE ORDERS

Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States

Election - F'OREIGN POLICY

Issued on: September 12, 2018

* * * By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws oft he United States of

America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)

(IEEPA}, the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S. C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f}), and section 301 of title 3, United States

Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons

located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine

public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of

election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation,

constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the

United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote

tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit

America's free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and

internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope

and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community

Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order.

APX 002

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of

National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive

departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating

that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign

government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment

shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any

methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or

governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National

Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President,

the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General,

and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section l(a) of this

order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads

of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the

President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a

report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment

described in section l(a):

(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially

affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely

transmission of election results; and

(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to,

a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially

affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to,

disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.

The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney

General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at

the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations,

when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other

than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

APX 003

(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any

information relevant to the execution of the Director's duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate

and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the

report mandated by section l(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any

other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and

the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section l(b), as

appropriate.

(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from

tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information,

assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.

(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election with in the

United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment

mandated by section l(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section l(b) of this order, or

submitted to the President in an independent report.

(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the

Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National

Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective

responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part,

shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner

that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive

information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between

intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral

processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free

speech and open debate.

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come

within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any

United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid,

exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the

Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of

Homeland Security:

APX 004

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit

in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological

support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any actiVity described in subsection (a)(i)

of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to

this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of,

directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant

to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of Aprill, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28,

2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of

the Treasury's discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where

appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, In consultation with the Attorney General and the

Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other

authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury's exercise of authorities provided in

this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes,

or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and

notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this

order.

Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section l(a) and the report

mandated by section l(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section l(a) and the

report mandated by section l(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney

General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to

section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and

(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other

appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether

APX 005

additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified

foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section l(b) of this

order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with

respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government

authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity

from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and

transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country's largest business entities, sectors of comparable

strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an

assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security

interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately

calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the

following with respect to each targeted foreign person:

(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person's property and interests in property

subject to United States jurisdiction;

(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and

approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods

or services;

(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a

person;

(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;

(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by,

through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;

(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;

(vii) exclusion of a person's alien corporate officers from the United States;

(viii) imposition on a person's allen principal executive officers of any of the sanctions

described in this section; or

APX 006

(ix) any other measures authorized by law.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section

203(b)(2) of IEEPA (SO U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and

interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal

with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as

provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit

of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States

of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be

detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States,

as immigrants or non immigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons

covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to

United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a

violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;

(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust) joint venture, corporation, group,

subgroup, or other organization;

APX 007

(c) the term "United States person'' means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien,

entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States

(including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;

(d) the term "election fnfrastructure'' means information and communications technology and

systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in

managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting

tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure t ransmission of election results;

(e) the term "United States election" means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date

of this order;

(f) the term "foreign interference," with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent,

deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign governmeht, or of any person

acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of

Influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or

undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;

(g) the term "foreign government" means any national, state, provincia(, or other governing

authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each

case of a country other than the United States;

(h) the term ''covert," with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an

intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or

acknowledged publicly; and

(I) the term "State'' means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions

of the United States.

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this

order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the

ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to

be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine

that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order,

there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

APX 008

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of

the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary

of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and

regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to

carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these

functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All

agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures

within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary

of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the

national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (SO U.S.C.

164l(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (SO U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with SO U.S. C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,

administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of

appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or

procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments,

agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Custom Search

F r i d a y , M a r c h 1 6 , 2 0 1 8

OBAMA HIRED THEM. TRUMP CANNOT FIRE THEM.SO THEY SAY.Senior Executive Service (SES) is ~10,000 Deep Stateshadow government employees who are sabotaging theAmerican Republic for the globalist agenda

Download, study and share the "Crimeline" widely

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | MAR. 16, 2018, UPDATED APR. 16, 2018 |PDF | https://tinyurl.com/y9nuqhht

The Untouchables

Shadow Government is Collapsing

DEEP STATESHADOWGOVERNMENTPOSTERHarvard | Yale | Stanford Sycophants

Bookmark: #stand-with-roger-stone

ROGER STONE SPEAKS: On Nov.

18, 2017, Twitter censored best-selling author Roger Stone completely. Everyred-blooded American should be outraged,Republican, Democrat and Independent alike. IfRoger's voice is silenced today, yours is next. Wemust this embargo. Click here to read andshare Roger's latest perspectives on the Battlefor our Republic, including his responses to hiscritics (who have not been censored).

This timeline shows how insiders sell access

& manipulate politicians, police, intelligence,

judges and media to keep their secrets

Clintons, Obamas, Summers were paid in cash foroutlandish speaking fees and Foundation donations.Sycophant judges, politicians, academics, bureaucratsand media were fed tips to mutual funds tied to insiderstocks like Facebook. Risk of public exposure,blackmail, pedophilia, “snuff parties” (ritual child sexualabuse and murder) and Satanism have ensured silenceamong pay-to-play beneficiaries. The U.S. Patent Officeis their toy box from which to steal new ideas.

Se

Updated Oct. 10, 2018.

CLICK HERE TO SEECOMBINED TIMELINE OF THEHIJACKING OF THE INTERNET

More [email protected] Dashboard Sign Out

APX 009

BREAKING MAR. 20, 2018

DEVASTATING SES / SERCO DOCUMENTSPOURING IN FROM ANONYMOUS SOURCES

The American SS Exposed

SeS Governing Council 500 ExposedUpdated Mar. 19, 2014

CONGRESS CONTACT LOOKUP

FOLLOW BY EMAIL

Email address... Submit

▼

►

►

BLOG ARCHIVE

APX 010

(MAR. 16, 2018)

►

►

►

►

►

▼

►

►

►

►

►

►

►

►

UPDATE MAR. 25, 2014

FIVE CRITICAL AFI POSTS ON JUDICIALCOMPROMISE

HOW PATENT JUDGES GROWRICH ON THE BACKS OFAMERICAN INVENTORS

WAS CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS BLACKMAILED

JUSTICE ROBERTS MENTORED

JUSTICE ROBERTS HOLDS

JUDGE LEONARD STARK FAILED

BARACK OBAMA'S DARK POOLSOF CORRUPTION

APX 011

CLICK HERE FOR WASHINGTON'S ETHICALDISEASE DISCOVERIES RE. FACEBOOK "DARKPOOLS"

STOP FACEBOOK PROPERTY THEFT

ASK CONGRESS: PASS THEINVENTOR PROTECTION ACT!

APX 012

LEADER V. FACEBOOKBACKGROUND

APX 013

SEARCH SES EMPLOYEE ROSTERS IN THETABLE BELOW

GIBSON DUNN LLP exposed as oneof the most corrupt law rms inAmerica

POPULAR POSTS

APX 014

EDITORIALS

APX 015

SES = SS ?

WHAT AVERAGE PERSON HAS THE TIME TOENGAGE IN THIS SUSTAINED IMMORALITY?

Senator Daniel K. Inouye (HI) exposed "a shadowy goveee…

OUR MISSION

CURRENT EDITORIAL FOCUS

APX 016

BARACK OBAMA’S & HILLARY'S DEEP STATESHADOW GOVERNMENT “SES CADRE”

WELCOME TO DONNA KLINE NOW!READERS!

APX 017

THE ROGUE SES SAYS THE PRESIDENTCANNOT FIRE THEM!

IS SES ABOVE THE LAW?

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR U.S.JUDGES

Judge Leonard P. Stark

Judge Alan D. Lourie

GALLERY OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT

APX 018

POSTSCRIPT

SES: The Vermin Among Us

Facebook Commits Crimes Against the State

Judge Kimberly A. Moore

Judge Evan J. Wallach

APX 019

WAFFEN S(E)S HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT

Clerk of Court Jan Horbaly

APX 020

COMMENT

75 comments:

Judge Randall R. Rader

Updated May 22, 2015

APX 021

hide

hiding We The People

By Anonymous Patriots

APX 022

APX 023

APX 024

APX 025

APX 026

APX 027

Type of appoiotment:

PAS PrtSdeotiuJ 8ppoint;menl,'by and l"iU~ the od"ice ~nd OO[l!iellt of the Senate. PA Pn!<9idefltial appointment PL Position ucept.ed from the competitive oivi)SC!...,.ite by statute. SES Pg,;itiqn in th4! Senhn Exe~;u~ive $f:cvic;e. NEA PosWon .at GS-16, l7, or 18 which the Offioe of Pt>nonnel Management hu 41Uthorilled to !l@

filled by Noncareer Executive A"il!llment. A Poijition .ex~;ept.ed from the competitive c:ivil aervlA;:e by the Office of Pel'11onnel Management

-... h icb is ntJt of fl. conJidenti61 or policy det.ermininf ch.ar~>ctet and for which it i.e not pntd.kDble w hotd an examin11tion.

B Position t>xct>pted from the competitive civil 111?1'111ce by the Office of Pel'90nnel M&nllgerDfil!nt whi~h i9 not of a con.fidt>ntia} or policy deumnining characUlt and far which it i1 not prxtic9.ble to hold a competitive examination.

e P~ilion of 11 ccmfidential or policy det.ennining c.haraoter which ill excepted from the competitive ~ivil eervil;e by tbe Office of Personnel l,te.nl'gement and to which appointments may be made wilhout ellemination lly thBt Office.

Level; Gr!lde, or Salary~

Level E·uoeutlve Level. GS G~ner~l S<;hedule. GG Administrative grade similar toGS. GM MerilPay. NE Gra~e not t'Stablished. p.d. Per diem-<l.aily rate of pe;y. p.h. Per hour-bom-ly rate of pay. W.c. Without compengation. til .lnl.ermitter.t, when aetually empJoye<t WG Blue C?llar ~tlon for "'hith !>3Y is eslablish!!d at th~ lcx:~l prt<Vailing rate in the wm·

mLJm~y.

APX 028

Type of appointment;

.PAS PA PL SES NEA

c

P~6idential apf)l>intmont, by and with the advice und uons~ml onhe Senat.e. rrcsldentiul appointment. Position excepted from the competitive civil s.ervioe by !l.atute. Posit ion In the Senior Executive Service. Position at 05-16, 17, or 18 which the Office of Personnel Management has authorized to be

filled by Noncareer Executive Assignment. f''osition of a confidential or .policy determining character which i.& excepted from the

competitive ctvl l aervlce by the Office of Personnel Manl)gement. o11d to wlolch 11ppolnv ments may be made without examination by that Office,

Le.vel, Grade, or Salary:

Level Executive LeveL GS General Schedule. GG Administrative grade similar to OS. OM Merit Pay, NE Grade not established. p.d. Per diem-daily rate of pay. p.h. Per h9ur-hourly rate of pay. W.c. Without compensation. (l) Intermittent, when actt.~ally employed. WG Blue collar position for which pay is established at the local prevailing rate in the

communi ty.

APX 029

-T)'pe or Appoin-t lCobmiD 5)

Liat.d are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the potition incumben~ is servil!&'· Note that eeverlll es!A!gories of poaltf®s t!lll be 6Ded by more tbe.n one<~ of appointment. e.g., S~ posltionalietod in tl!ie public~t:ion may be filled by using c....,r, noncareer; limited emergency, or limlte<l term appolnlmont autborit.ios. Thoniforo, no "rypo of ApPOintment~ is shown for auch poaldou when tbey are V""""t.

PAS = ProlJi<lentlal Aj:Jpoinll!lont IIIith &nate Confirme.t®n PA " ?1-osidentoal Appointment (Witbol\t SenoiA! oonfirmt~t.ion) CA = Ca.re~r Appointment NA = Nonearo•r Appoinlmont EA = Limited Emergency Appointment TA " Llmited 'l.:erm Appointment SC • Schedule C E«epted Ap)>QU.tmenl XS = Appointment Excepted by Statute

Pay Pl.aD (Collllml 4)

Listed are le~r codes tl!at denote the F"'!Pnl eal!U)' 4Clled'ul~ or pay system under whidl pqilion lncu.mbente !l"' pai4. 'fable• ahnwillg the salary ran.eeo for es.dll}ay ·~tem are eontained m .Appendlr "-

EX a Ex.ecutive Schodtil~ Ell :. &nior Erecutive Service SL = Senior Level GM = Performance Management and Recogni tion Sys tem (Merit. Peyl GS General Schedule FE = ~eniur Fbreign Ser'Vlee FP Foreign SerVice Speoiafut O'l' Other Pay Ple.o (all those not listed septl1'B!ely) PD D11ily 'Po,y &.te• Cp~r d:ieml WC Witnout CompEnsation•

APX 030

APX 031

Type of Appointment (Column 5)

Listed are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the position incumbent is serving.

Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment (e.g. , SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by us ing career. noncareer, limited emergency, orlimited term appointment

authorities). Therefore. no "Type of Appointment" is shown forsuch positions when they are vacant. Note also

that some part-time Presidential Appointments are not included in tlus listing such as those serving on temporary commissions or those boards and commissions which are governed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

PAS

PA

CA

NA

EA

TA sc xs

Pay Plan (Column 4)

Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation

Presidential Appointment (without Senate confirmation)

Career Appointment

Non career Appointment

Limited Emergency Appointment

Limited Term Appointment Schedule C Excepted Appointment

Appointment Excepted by Statute

Listed are letter codes that denote the Federal salary schedu le or pay system under which position

incumbents are paid. Tables showing the salary ranges for each pay system are contained in Appendix 4 .

EX

ES SL

AD

GS

FE

FP

VH

TM

CG

OT PD

we

Executive Schedule

Senior Executive Service Senior Leve.J

Administrat.ively Determined

General Schedule

Senior Foreign Service Foreign Service Spe.cialist

Farm Credit Administration Pay Plan

Federal Housing Finance Board Merit Pay

Corporate Graded at Federal Deposit ln,surance Corporation

Other Pay Plan (all. those not listed separa te ly) Daily Pay Rate* (per diem)

Without Compensation*

APX 032


Listed are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the position incumbent is serving. Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment, e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by using career, noncareer, limited emergency, or limited term appointment authorities. Therefore, no "'Type of Appointment" is shown for such positions when they are vacant.

PAS Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation PA Presidential Appointment (without Senate confirmation) CA Career Appointment NA Noncareer Appointment EA Limited Emergency Appointment TA Limited Term Appointment SC Schedule C Excepted Appointment XS Appointment Excepted by Statute

P ay Plan (Column 5)

Listed are letter codes that denote the Federal salary schedule or pay system under which position incumbents are paid. Tables showing the salary ranges for each pay system are contained in Appendix 4.

EX Executive Schedule ES Senior Executive Service SL Senior Level GM Performance Management and Recognition System (Merit Pay) GS General Schedule FE Senior Foreign Service FP Foreign Service Specialist OT Other Pay Plan (aU those not listed separately) PD Daily Pay Rate* (per diem) WC Without Compensation*

APX 033


Listed are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the position incumbent is serving. Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment, e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by using career, noncareer: limited emergency, or limited term appointment authorities. Therefore, no "Type of Appointment" is shown for such positions when they are vacant.

PAS PA CA NA TA sc xs

Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation Presidential Appointment (without Senate Confirmation) Career Appointment Noncareer Appointment Limited TeJ·m Appointment Schedule C Excepted Appointment Appointment Excepted by Statute

Pay Plan (Column 5)

Listed are letter codes that denote the Federal salary schedule or pay system under which the position incumbents are going to be paid. Tables showing the salary ranges for major pay systems are contained in Appendix 4.

AD Administratively Determined Rates ES Senior Executive Service EX Executive Schedule FA Foreign Service Chiefs of Mission FE Senior Foreign Service FP Foreign Service Specialist GS General Schedule PD Daily Pay Rate* (per diem) SL Senior Level TM Federal Housing Finance Board Merit Pay VH Farm Credit Administration Pay Plan WC Without Compensation* OT Other Pay Plan* (all those not listed separately)

APX 034


Listed are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the position incumbent is serving. Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment, e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by using career, noncareer; limited emergency, or limib:!d term appointment authorities. Therefore, no "Type of Appointment" is shown for such positions when they are vacant.

PAS PA CA NA EA TA sc xs

Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation Presidential Appointment (without Senate Confirmation) Career Appointment Noncareer Appointment Limited Emergency Appointment Lintited Term Appointment Schedule C Excepted Appointment Appointment Excepted by Statute

P ay Plan (Co lumn 5 )

Listed are letter codes that denote the Federal salary schedule or pay system under which the position incumbents are going to be paid. Tables showing the salary ranges for major pay systems are contained in Appendix 4.

AD ES EX FA FE FP GS PD SL TM VH we OT

Administratively Determined Rates Senior Executive Service Executive Schedule Foreign Service Chiefs of Mission Senior Foreign Service Foreign Service Specialist General Schedule Daily Pay Rate* (per diem) Senior Level Federal Housinfm~::;ance Board Merit Pay Farm Credit A · "stration Pay Plan Without Compensation* Other Pay Plan* (all those not listed separately)

APX 035


Listed are letter codes that denote the type of appointment under which the position incumbent is serving. Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment, e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by using career, noncareer; limited emergency. or limited term appointment authorities. Therefore, no "Type of Appointment" is shown for such positions when they are vacant.

PAS PA CA NA EA TA sc xs

Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation Presidential Appointment (without Senate Confirmation) Career Appointment Noncareer Appointment Limited Emergency Appointment Limited Term Appointment Schedule C Excepted Appointment Appointment Excepted by Statute

Pay Plan (Column 5)

Listed are lett.er codes that denote the Federal salary schedule or pay system under which the position incumbents are going to be paid. Tables showing the salary range for major pay systems are contained .in AppendL'< 4.

AD Administratively Determined Rates ES Senior Executive Service EX Executive Schedule FA Foreign Service Chiefs of Mission FE Senior Foreign Service FP Foreign Servi_ce Specialist GS General Schedule PD Daily Pay Rate~ (per diem) SL SeniOT Level TM Federal Housing Finance Board Merit Pay VH Farm Credit Administration Pay Plan WC Without Compensation* OT Other Pay Plan* (all those not listed separately)

APX 036

5/24/2018 Tentacles of SERCO Strangle America – American Intelligence Media

https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/11/tentacles-of-serco-strangle-america/ 1/44

AMERICANINTELLIGENCE MEDIA

Citizens Addicted to Truth

ANONYMOUS PATRIOTS / APRIL 11 , 2018 @ 1:06 PM

TENTACLES OF SERCO STRANGLEAMERICA

APX 037



We stand corrected. We have reported that we are ghting the Second AmericanRevolution. But our continuing research shows us that this is not the case. It appearsthat the rst American Revolutionary War was never won, and we are still under Britishrule, in ways more sinister than the average person is aware.

It all started in our research of the Senior Executive Service. We showed you how thisunconstitutional shadow government is highly organized and well paid. Its members arepositioned within our civil service bureaucracies to overthrow the Republic in plain sightand establish itself as the governing body of Marxist globalists whose SES memberswork daily to thwart the will of the people, ignore and bastardize the rule of law, anddestroy the Republic from within.

.

so that you could name these individuals speci cally andexpose their bureaucratic spider holes.

We call Senior Executive Service Obama’s Army

SES is the shadow government.

We gave you research tools

APX 038



We thought the story was over until we started researching a group that lands most ofthe government’s contracts thanks to its close relationship to Senior Executive Service.Together – SES and SERCO – operate the United States government with the purpose ofdestroying our nation and giving our country away to the Queen of England.

Citizens of the world, not just Americans, are still subjects of the British Monarchy.

Let us explain why.

This video below will give you an overview before diving into the article:

The Biggest Company You've Never Heard Of

THE BIGGEST COMPANY YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF

APX 039



BRITISH CROWN AND BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY RULEAMERICAThe British Crown and the British East India Company have never left America, and infact, they have a stranglehold on the U. S. economy that is a death grip. The Bank ofEngland, the City of London, and ultimately the British Monarchy – Queen Elizabeth II,own and control U. S. data management, corporate banking, resources of gas, uranium,gold, and many strategic resources and systems in the United States.

This system, called SERCO, is widelyknown and many researchers and authorsprecede us in their reporting; however, it isour intent in this series of articles andvideos to show the speci c rat lines thatmake Senior Executive Services andSERCO the evilest system in the world. Wewill be showing you the big picture ofSERCO in this series.

In subsequent articles, posts, and videos, we will show you the connections of namedSES agents who make sure that SERCO controls the systems and services of the UnitedStates government.

We will show you how Serco is not only an enemy of the United States, but an enemy ofcountries and people around the world. In the end, we hope you conclude, as have we,that the British Monarch has no place in the United States government and any of itsservices. The cozy relationship that Serco has with SES must be eliminated and laws bewritten to prevent this quiet overthrow of the Republic by SES and Serco.

For example, did you know that the U. S. Patent O ce is controlled by Serco? That’s right,a BRITISH based company controls the creative efforts of American entrepreneurs and

APX 040



creators. Serco was the company awarded the Obamacare data management systemthat cost America’s over $2 billion.

SES employees in charge of selecting contracts for this lucrative data managementsystem didn’t nd U.S. based companies to do the work. Instead they cherry-pick theirbuddies at British owned and controlled Serco to deliver Obamacare management.

The American corporate mechanism for the continued enrichment of the British Crown isthe same one used for the corporate sell-out of the American Republic – corporatelobbyists controlling Congress, corporate pay-to-play through the executive branch (suchas Hillary’s Department of State), and the Senior Executive Service to maintain thebureaucratic status quo, selling out to global corporatism at every turn with no bidcontracts and cronyism.

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICES AND SERCO ARE THE PEOPLE ANDORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS THAT THE BRITISH MONARCH USES TOCONTROL AMERICA.

Senior Executive Service aligns with the imperialistic intents of Serco and numerousother corporations that are listed in this report (BP, Shell, ICAP, British American Tobacco,SABMiller, American Standard Life, Rio Tinto, Ixstrata, etc.).

Here are a few highlights of what Serco does already in our government. To our friends inother parts of the world, don’t be surprised when you see similar structures in your owncountry run by the British Monarch through Serco:

SSerco manages all patents for the U. S. Patent and Trademark O ce. Brits have therst shot at stealing American’s intellectual property rights. This is shocking but

true.

APX 041



SSerco controls the most sensitive data management systems in all branches of themilitary, federal government, and state and local municipalities.

Serco controls air tra c management, airlines security, airport management and allaspects of ticketing, visa data management, and timetable management.

Serco is called, “the largest company no one has ever heard of.”

Serco’s e ciency rating in England, Canada, and Australia is below 65% and manylawsuits have been led against the company for egregious fraud andmismanagement.

Serco was paid $1.2 billion to management the data of Obamacare — Britishcompany handling American’s private medical information.

.

Serco goes by many names so always look under the hood in their corporate documentsto nd its trail back to Queen Lizzie. In America, it operates as Serco Inc. and claims onits website that it “is a leading provider of professional, technology, and managementservices for the federal government”. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, Serco Inc. hasapproximately 10,000 employees, annual revenue of $2.5 billion, and is ranked in the top35 of the largest federal prime contractors.

Piercing the corporate veil, we nd that Serco Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SercoGroup plc, a $7 billion international business that works with government and publicservices around the world.

Many researchers say that Serco runs the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, and Australia.Serco has over 60,000 people in 35 countries across the world. To our internationalreaders, it is highly doubtful that they are not operating in your country.

Serco is a leading provider of public services of all types. Serco operates internationallyacross ve sectors and four geographies: defense, justice, immigration, transportation,health and human services. Its services are delivered in UK, Europe, North America, AsiaPaci c, and the Middle East.

APX 042



Serco delivers records management and processing support services for many U. S.government agencies. Major programs include processing and classifying of patentapplications for the U.S. Patent and Trademark O ce; records management and processof applications and petitions at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ ServiceCenters; processing visa applications at the U.S. Department of State’s National VisaCenter and Kentucky Consular Center; and, records management services at the U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services’ National Bene ts Center, among others.

Ninety percent of Serco’s business is with the federal government with 10,000 workersacross 45 states. Serco’s experience is in paper pushing, records management,processing applications, processing visas, handling patents with the U.S. Patent andTrademark O ce. There are more than 60 million records that Serco handles for theDepartment of Homeland Security.

Serco Inc. is indeed part of Serco Group, an international contracting rm headquarterednear London and partly owned by the UK government itself. Serco Inc. is the NorthAmerica division of Serco Group, plc. In North America, Serco Inc. serves federal, stateand local governments, along with the Canadian government and commercialcustomers, and over 14,000 in North Americas.

Digest that for a moment: U.S. federal records, personal medical records, patents, andvisas are held by a company owned and directed by the British Monarch. Its “soldiers onthe ground” are employees of SES who guarantee that Serco gets the contracts, and thenmanages and oversees their continued involvement.

America is not a sovereign nation with this arrangement. We are still subjects of theBritish Monarchy.

HOW DID THE BRITISH MONARCH GAIN CONTROL OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT?

APX 043



In 1897, Guglielmo Marconi’s successful development of trans-Atlantic radiocommunications and his drive to expand this capability resulted in the establishment ofan American communications company named Radio Corporation of America (RCA).RCA assumed all the assets of the Marconi Wireless Company in America so that alltechnological development of radio communications for the U.S. Armed Forces wouldcome under the auspices of the U.S. Government via a wholly-owned American entity.

RCA’s success in America soon turned to the market on the other side of the Atlantic. OnSeptember 10, 1929, RCA set up the rst RCA subsidiary in the UK – this is what istraditionally considered to be the “start” of Serco. In 1959, an RCA subsidiary in GreatBritain negotiated a contract to install and commission an early warning radar station atRAF Flyingdales as part of the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System project. Thiscontract, awarded in 1960, secured the future for RCA in the UK. RCA now had evolvedwith demonstrable capabilities in the eld of technical support for the most complexantenna and radar communication networks.

In 1969, RCA organized itself into operational divisions, one of which was focused onservice, and so it came about that the RCA Service Division was formed – the part of thecompany that would eventually be purchased by its management and staff and renamedSerco.

Serco established its North American foothold in 1988 when it was incorporated,acquiring companies that shared a similar vision. In 2005, Serco acquired ResourceConsultants Inc. (RCI), which expanded its capabilities in IT services, systemsengineering, strategic consulting and HR-focused business process management. In2008 Serco acquired SI International, further broadening its capabilities in IT andprofessional services in North America and gaining new federal government and DoDrelationships.

Serco Inc. now employs approximately 14,000 people across the U.S. and Canada. Thecompany delivers services to all branches of the U.S. military, federal and civilianagencies, state and local agencies, and commercial customers.

APX 044



In July of 2013, Serco was awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to support thehealth bene t exchanges. The contract had a one-year base period and four one-yearoption periods. As posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website, the contractvalue was approximately $1.25 billion.

Serco manages approximately 1,500 staff in Arkansas, Alabama, and Kentucky whosupport CMS with the routing, automated processing, reviewing, and troubleshooting ofapplications submitted for enrollment into a Quali ed Health Plan. Serco also providesrecords management, and veri cation support.

SSerco is so deeply embedded in our governmental operations that we have concludedthat its take-over of the Republic is complete. Unless the unconstitutional SeniorExecutive Service is totally eliminated and new laws written to prevent internationalcompanies like Serco from ever operating within the government, we might as well ythe British ag over the Capitol building.

To see more on Serco and its paper trail back to RCA Photophone see:

.

SERCO TENTACLES ALL OVER THE WORLDSerco’s reach is not just in the UK and the US. As one of the leading providers of publicsector services in the world, Serco’s UK and Europe region employs more than 31,700people across 11 countries including Belgium, France, Germany and Italy. Serco advisespolicy makers, designs innovative solutions, integrates systems and delivers front-lineservices. Within the UK and Europe, Serco works across public service sectors in justice,immigration, healthcare, defense, transport and citizen services.

WHAT IS THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT SERCO?

APX 045



After reading about how Serco is entrenched inthe U.S. government, we encourage internationalresearchers to unmask these British Monarchtentacles in their own countries. If we all worktogether globally in exposing Serco, we might beable break free of the Queen’s rule over the worldwhere she still believes that the sun never setson her Empire. Then we can go after herhandlers – the CityofLondon, the Knights ofMalta, and the Vatican.

SERCO’S DEATH GRIP ON THE U.S. PATENT OFFICEOn March 18, 2013, Serco Inc., announced that their Pre-Grant Publication (PGPubs)Classi cation Services team recently processed their 2 millionth patent application forthe U.S. Patent and Trademark O ce (USPTO). Each application was also processedwithin the contractually required 28-day window.

USPTO is the government agency that grants U.S. patents and registers trademarks. In2006, Serco was awarded the contract with USPTO to manage their Pre-GrantPublication (PGPubs) Classi cation Services. Serco’s PGPubs team has since beenresponsible for analyzing the claims made in patent applications and assigning theappropriate U.S. and international classi cations to key aspects of proposed inventions.

In a single day, Serco’s PGPubs Patent Classi ers processed approximately 1,450 patentapplications by analyzing more than 21,800 patent claims and assigning more than7,900 U.S. and international classi cations. Since 2006, the team has built a virtuallypaperless classi cation operation. The operation, they claim on their website, “includes asecure facility with IT infrastructure, procedures for recruiting and training highly skilledstaff, and implementation of a set of automated tools that streamlined the classi cationprocess”. The facility is located in Harrisonburg, Virginia.

APX 046



On November 30, 2015, Serco was awarded a patent classi cation services contract withthe United States Patent and Trademark O ce (USPTO). The recompete contract has aone-year base period with four one-year option periods, and is valued at $95 million overthe ve-year period, if all options and award terms are exercised.

Serco has supported the USPTO under this program since its inception in 2006, andcurrently processes approximately 1,600 applications a day, and over 400,000applications annually. Under the contract, Serco has been instrumental in assisting theUSPTO as it transitioned to a new international classi cation standard called CooperativePatent Classi cation (CPC) and will continue to provide services within CPC that enablesthe USPTO to align and lead within the global intellectual property environment.

SSerco Patent Processing System

In reading about how Serco’s patent processing system works, we peel back anotherlayer of how

, the U.S. Patent o ce, and all corrupt attorneys involved in thispatent heist of all times.

Michael McKibben and Leader Technologies were ripped off by the IBMEclipse Foundation

APX 047



Zuckerberg’s Theft of Social Media

Below is a description of how the patent process works and shows you how Serco is partof the process from start to nish. What Serco added to the process was the new keyelement of making all American patents t an international format. Serco has rst“choice” on what patents may be an issue of “national security” and thus con scated andeventually weaponized by the Department of Defense or the Central Intelligence Agency.

The description below is the initial process Serco uses to “screen” all U. S. patents. It istaken from the U.S. Department of Commerce Privacy Impact Assessment called theSerco Patent Processing System (Unique Project Identi er: [1858] PTOC-016-00)

Introduction

System Description. Provide a description of the system that addresses the followingelements:

APX 048



a general description of the information in the system. This system processes inboundelectronic images of patent applications received by Serco Inc. from USPTO. Thesystem consists of a variety of application review, research tools and data entry toolsto facilitate the evaluation and classi cation of the application creating a series of USPatent Classi cation (USPC) system and Cooperative Patent Classi cation (CPC)system classi cation data elements that describe the application.

a description of a typical transaction conducted on the system. Serco PPS receivespatent applications directly from the United States Patent and Trademark O ce(USPTO).

any information sharing conducted by the system. Serco PPS does not share anyinformation with other agencies, individuals, or organizations. The informationprovided by USPTO is used by Serco for authorized activities performed by internalpersonnel only.

a citation of the legal authority to collect PII and/or BII. The PII and BII data is collectedby the USPTO to enable identi cation of the inventory and facilitate the patentapplication process. It is provided to the Serco PPS so that classi cation activities canbe performed on the collected patent application.

the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS). 199 security impact categoriesfor the system.

.

As you can read in the description of the initial process Serco uses to screen patents, theentire nature of the patent is provided to Serco. If Serco doesn’t approve a patent, itdoesn’t go forward. In other words, Serco controls American innovation and has theopportunity to steal any patent that is desirable to them. America is feeding Britishinnovation and we pay Serco to conduct this theft of intellectual property.

If you thought the theft of IP by China was bad, Serco’s complete control of our patents ismuch worse. Below, you will read our case study of one entrepreneur who was ripped offroyally by this corrupt patent system. And we happen to know many others likeMcKibben, especially in the energy sector, who aren’t able to make theri stories public…yet.

APX 049



.

SERCO SERVICES IN AMERICA – IN ITS OWN WORDSIt is often best to see what a corporation says about itself on its own website. Sercoreveals the extensive controls they have established in all aspects of American lifethrough bragging about their accomplishments. Once you have seen the pervasivecontrol that Serco has on the U. S. military and all aspects of government, you may beshocked.

You can read these descriptions about Serco at: . Thedescriptions are lifted from their website, in their own words:

Comprehensive Support for Mission-Critical Communications and IT Systems

Serco provides comprehensive support for mission-critical communications and ITsystems used by military, intelligence and civilian government clients. From informationarchitecture to installation and maintenance, Serco covers the full technology life cycle insome of the most demanding and secure IT environments in the world.

Serco is known for our deep domain knowledge, ability to handle large scale projects,and exceptional customer focus. We have played an important role in evolving criticalC4ISR systems that continue to make information superiority a key advantage of the U.S.armed forces.

We work with a range of federal civilian agencies and every branch of the armed forcesto deliver solutions that advance their missions. Our exible, comprehensive offeringcovers IT modernization efforts, including software application development, database

FACEBOOK UNMASKED: HOW THE WORLD’S MOST RELEVANTENTREPRENEUR WAS SCREWED BY ZUCKERBERG

https://www.serco-na.com/

APX 050



management, systems/network engineering and administration, Information Assurance,and Help Desk services.

Engineer, Furnish, Install & Test Services – From command and control centers tosensors and antennas, Serco supports the critical communications infrastructure thatunderpins defense, homeland security, and intelligence capabilities. We provide designengineering, installation, testing, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) services for new,upgraded or elded systems and equipment in a range of mission-critical environmentsfor the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, DHS and other federal agencies.

Ship Modernization Services – Serco supports the ongoing modernization of the eet toincorporate the latest technology, minimize downtime, and meet exacting budgets andtimelines. Serco’s support for the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard has grown quicklybased on our ability to assemble high quality teams, anticipate client needs, andconsistently deliver on our promises.

Serco provides systems integration, installation, repair, and testing for the systems thatadvance operational capabilities globally.

Hardware Production & Test Services – Serco builds and delivers “mission-ready” IT,networking and communications systems adapted to the needs of clients in defense,intelligence, and homeland security.

Application & Eligibility Support – Serco has experience processing millions ofapplications in a highly e cient and secure manner to achieve high levels of citizensatisfaction. We provide application processing, decision support, bene ts management,case management, call centers, and fraud prevention.

Document Management – Serco provides full life-cycle support for document conversion,data entry, content management and records management required for large-scaleprograms and complying with all applicable regulations.

APX 051



Workforce Development – Serco provides workforce management services across theentire hire-to-retire journey, including recruitment, workforce analytics and planning,bene ts, training, consulting, leader development, incentives and compensation,organizational design, and change management.

Facilities Management Solutions – Serco provides full lifecycle facilities and assetmanagement solutions, utilizing IBM TRIRIGA, to enable data driven-decisions thatachieve cost savings, provide superior work places, and ensure regulatory compliance fororganizations.

Cyber Architecture – We employ an Enterprise Architecture-based approach to cyberoperations that provides a powerful means to integrate cyber security within theframework of your mission and critical systems, so as to promote effective governance,standardized infrastructure, and consistent execution.

Cyber Awareness – We help our clients develop the ability to effectively monitor, detect,and react to cyber intrusions before they cause signi cant damage. This includesmaintaining global situational awareness and undertaking effective defensive andoffensive countermeasures.

Cyber Education – Because the human actor often remains the most vulnerable link inthe chain, Serco provides an integrated approach to training, compliance, and monitoringof cyber security policies and procedures.

IT Infrastructure, including:

Application Development

Cloud Migration

Datacenter Operations

Database Development & Maintenance

Information Assurance

APX 052



Helpdesk & IT Support

Virtualization

Wireless Mobility & BYOD

Cloud Migration

Core Networking

Data Center Consolidation

LAN/WAN Networks

Satellite Communications

Voice & Video Networks

Wireless Communications

.

Acquisition Logistics – Serco provides acquisition support to our military clients on avariety of advanced weapons systems, with a focus on maximizing operationalreadiness.

Emergency Response – Serco has assisted with large scale emergency response efforts,including establishing rapid deployment medical facilities in Haiti and Chile followingnatural disasters. We help the Navy to deploy transportable hospitals that includelaboratory, radiology, pharmacy, patient wards, and operating wards.

Logistics Data Management – Serco has the expertise required to design and managelarge-scale logistics data systems to provide our clients with asset visibility, controls, andanalytics required for complex operations.

Logistics Planning & Engineering – Serco has helped manage the large-scale movementof equipment and assets as a trusted agent on behalf of the military, with a focus onprogram e ciency, cost avoidance, and repurposing of valuable property.

APX 053



Supply Chain Management – Serco manages advanced IT systems and databases toprovide total visibility across the military supply chain to enable real-time monitoring andforecasting of materiel needs in dynamic environment.

Warehouse & Depot Management – We provide comprehensive ISO 9001:2000 certi edsupport for sustainment, maintenance, and repair at depots and warehouses to maintaina high degree of inventory accuracy and reduce waste at warehouses and depots.

Systems Engineering Capabilities, include:

Aviation and ATM systems

Complex simulation & 3D modeling

C4I Systems

Intelligent tra c management

Integrated logistics support

Missile defense

Safety & environmental engineering

Space-based communications

Survivability engineering

Tactical datalinks

Personnel Services – Serco has helped to design and run some of the most sophisticatedgovernment, military personnel, and military family support programs, including the USArmy Career and Alumni Program (ACAP), VA for Vets, Army OneSource, the USAWounded Warrior Advocate Program, and others.

Planning – Whether your work force is military or civilian, we have the analytic experienceand associated models to develop a strategic plan operating within your constraintswhich supports your mission and readiness.

APX 054



Analysis – Our Team has conducted policy, compensation, incentives, and retentionconsulting for the Army and Navy for decades. Incentives take many forms, but thebottom line of the analysis is to determine the optimal mix of controls to produce thehighest readiness at lowest cost within the legal, policy, and budgetary constraints.

Recruitment – We understand military and government life and have the skills andexperience necessary to effectively draw in top talent while communicating the rewardsand bene ts of military service.

Processing and Administration – From processing to bene ts administration todischarging, our administrative support experts enable organizations to remainoperationally e cient, reduce errors and cycle times, and improve satisfaction of militarymembers and their families.

Military Career Transition – Serco understands the challenges of transitioning frommilitary to civilian life. We have pioneered programs to promote employment andaddress common family stresses. Serco’s military career transition specialists work withsoldiers to help them establish a foothold in the civilian world, maximizing the skills andabilities that made them successful in the military.

Service Member and Family Counseling – Millions of family members encounter uniquechallenges associated with government and military life – long deployments, relocations,and related stresses. We are there for service members and their families and our peoplebring understanding, empathy, and ability to personally connect through supportivecounseling.

Wounded Warrior Support – Warriors have the courage to overcome any challenge. Wesupport courageous solders that have sustained serious injuries in every way we knowhow – through one-on-one counseling, emotional support, family counseling and relatedservices.

APX 055



Training and Learning Solutions

Serco develops training programs and learning solutions that enable our clients toimprove mission readiness, incorporate lessons learned, and hone the skills that directlycontribute to mission success.

Mission Command Training – We operate a state-of-the-art simulation center used by theU.S. Army for mission command training.

War ghting Exercises – Serco supports the U.S. Marine Corps with programs coveringwar ghting skills, technology training, mission exercises, joint operations, and combatsimulation.

Healthcare Support Services

Serco provides non-clinical support services that enable hospitals and medical centers todeliver clinical services more e ciently, while improving patient satisfaction and bottomline performance.

Environmental services – Our cleaning services provide a uniformly high standard ofcleaning across the entire facility, creating the impression of a high quality, well run, andsafe environment.

Switchboard & operations center – At the heart of our solution is a centralized “commandcenter” in which all incoming calls are routed, dispatch and service requests are made,and complaints are logged and quickly resolved.

Patient transport & logistics – Using our standardized platform, transport resources areoptimized across the facility to improve on-time starts, reduce wait times, and improvethe patient experience.

APX 056



Transportation

Serco keeps critical transportation systems operating safely and e ciently. On theground, we integrate the latest technology with our experience in running some of theworld’s most advanced tra c management programs. In the air, Serco has expertise in afull range of air transportation solutions, which includes air tra c control, airportmanagement and aviation related technology and equipment.

Smart highways. Safe skyways. Wired metros. Shared bikes. Whether you travel byairplane, car, rail, boat, or bicycle, Serco can help you get there faster, safer, smarter.

With an outstanding safety record, Serco currently manages over 192,000 square milesof airspace worldwide, more than any other private company, and controls over 7 millionaircraft movements a year. We operate 63 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) VisualFlight Rules Air Tra c Control Towers in the United States. In the United States alone, wehelp more than 10 million commercial passengers each year reach their destinationssafely.

Intelligent Transportation Systems– Serco is a global leader in design and operation ofintelligent transportation systems. This includes tra c management centers, bridge andtunnel operations, tra c signal maintenance, incident management and safety servicepatrols, and tolling services.

Transit Services – Serco has decades of experience providing operations, maintenanceand marketing support for commuter rail, light rail, rapid transit, trams, and street cars.

Parking Management Services– Serco provides total management for parking systemsincluding installing and operating parking meter systems, managing parking spaceavailability, and managing parking enforcement and citations.

APX 057



Aviation Operations – Serco provides air tra c control operations at en route centers,radar approach control, airport towers, and airline ramp towers. We are experts indesigning and implementing Safety Management Systems (SMS) to support safetyexcellence across all our aviation operations.

Infrastructure Services – Serco provides engineering and support for a full range ofaviation infrastructure, including ground electronics maintenance, engineering andinstallation of ATM systems, and related communications, navigation, surveillance andweather systems.

Flight Support Services – Serco provides a range of ight support services includingweather forecasting, pilot brie ngs, and aeronautical information management. We offerinstructional services in subjects including air tra c control, ight safety, and safetymanagement systems. Serco is the only non-state organization authorized to issue AirTra c Control licenses on behalf of an ICAO signatory state.

Intelligent Transportation Systems

Serco has 30 years of experience developing and operating transportation solutions fornational highways, states, major cities, and local roads.

Road, Tunnel, Bridge & Tra c Management

System development & integration

Operational control center development

Incident detection & management

Lane control signals

CCTV control & surveillance

Intelligent congestion management

Manual & automated toll collection

Road-side infrastructure

APX 058



Tra c signals & management

Tunnel management

Vehicle recovery & emergency services

Equipment & vehicle maintenance

Air pollution monitoring

Bus tracking

Passenger mobile information services

Asset management systems

Transit Services

Serco is internationally recognized as one of the most experienced providers designingand managing heavy rail, light rail, metro and bus eets.

Heavy rail – Serco manages over 7,404 miles of heavy rail services. We draw from thebest practices learned from across decades of operations, on eight unique rail contracts,to help our clients achieve world-class service.

Light rail – Serco is a global leader in light rail systems with the expertise in developingand managing this important element of an integrated transportation system.

Metro – Metro systems continue to play a critical role in high-density urban areas. Sercohas achieved unmatched performance in operating large-scale metro systems acrossthe globe.

Bus Service – Our services encompass urban city buses, inter-urban express and coachbuses, metro rail feeder services, emergency replacement services, bus rapid transport,and airport landside transportation.

Serco Transit Services, include:

APX 059



Train, metro, bus & ferry operations

Control center operations

Security management

Transportation mode integration

Rail depot facility management

Rolling stock maintenance

Asset planning & deployment

Track, signaling & traction power maintenance

Passenger real-time information

Trip planning technology

Station layout & design

Ticketing information & pricing

Car park management

Passenger demand management

Bus network development, scheduling & management

Vehicle maintenance

Bus depot, stations, and control center operations

Driver training & education

Aviation Operations & Management

Serco offers an integrated approach to airport operators who wish to achieve highlye cient operations, improved passenger ow, and on time performance, while operatingat the highest levels of safety and security.

Key Services, include:

Air Tra c Control

Airport facilities management & maintenance

APX 060



Airport security

Airport advertising & retailing

Training – Aviation management & security

Ground handling

Passenger handling

Safety Management Systems

Freight/cargo handling

Ramp/apron services

Baggage handling

Grounds management

Airport ground lighting management

Fuel management

Bird control

Aircraft ground support equipment maintenance

Air eld & roads management

Vehicle eet management

Asset & stock management

Logistics services

Snow & ice removal

SERCO’S SERVICE ABILITIES ARE HIGHLY EXAGGERATEDIt may come as a shock to you that SERCO seems to be able to “do anything” in all areasof business and warfare. What company can say that they have all of this “expertise” inso many diverse eld of knowledge? No one can do so and still be effective and e cient.Serco is well known for being about 65% e cient. This should be expected. No companyhas the know-how and expertise to be e cient at “all things.”

APX 061



Essentially, Senior Executive Service members throughout the U. S. federal governmentsimply grant contracts and Serco tries to “keep up.” A recent example of itsincompetence is in the Obamacare website rollout which was extremely costly, yet, tothis day, is highly unfunctional to the average user.

Essentially, SERCO is like a monopoly of U. S. data management run by a foreign nation.This “selling out” of U. S. government contracts is corrupt cronyism that is well hiddenfrom the public. These deals happen as no bid contracts are shu ed across SESmembers’ desks and follow the common pattern of choosing the usual governmentcontractor that pays-to-play.

SERCO U. S. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTSIt may be hard to imagine all of the contracts that Serco has with the U. S. governmentso we listed some of the most obvious ones for you. The list of U. S. contracts is on theSerco website, with additional information on Wikipedia. It is not a secret that Serco getsany contract it wants and often with no other companies bidding.

PATRIOTS MIGHT ASK, “WHY WOULD WE CONTINUALLY GIVEGOVERNMENT CONTRACTS TO FOREIGN NATIONS AND CORPORATIONSTHAT HAVE A TERRIBLE TRACK RECORD OF EFFICIENCY?”

We do not know a good answer to that question. Any America would respond by sayingthat it is wrong, crazy, and economically unsound to pay foreigners to manage sensitiveAmerican interests. Patriots around the world do not support Queen Elizabeth and theBritish Monarchy in operating, managing, and nancially bene tting from our countriesany longer.

The list below is not comprehensive and there are many ways to hide the extensivenumber of Serco contracts with the U. S. military and government.

APX 062



AAir Force

Air Combat Command Air Force Director of Personnel Air Force District of Washington Air Force Electronics Systems Center Air Force Education and Training Command Air Force Information Warfare Center Air Force Institute for Advanced Distributed Learning Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Research Lab Air Force Space Command Space and Missile System Center Tinker Air Force Base

Army

Army Communications Electronics Command Army Defense Ammunition Center Army Enterprise Information Systems Army Human Resources Command Army IMCEM Army Materiel Command/Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Medical Department Army Research Labs Army Research, Development & Engineering Center Army Space and Missile Defense Command Army Training & Doctrine Command National Ground Intelligence Center Army Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Command Army Medical Command Army Installation Management Command Army Recruiting Command

APX 063



DDepartment of Defense

Defense Acquisition University Defense Ammunition Center Defense Information Systems Agency Defense Logistics Agency Defense Threat Reduction Agency Missile Defense Agency National Geospatial Intelligence Agency National Security Agency National Security Personnel System Program Executive O ce O ce of Intelligence & Analysis O ce of the Secretary of Defense United States Air Force Washington Headquarters Service

Joint Central Command

J6, Joint Staff Joint Advanced Distributed Learning Co-Laboratory Joint Forces War ghting Center North American Aerospace Defense Command Northern Command Southern Command Strategic Command (Space Command)

Navy

Center for Surface Combat Systems – Dahlgren Commander Navy Installations Command Financial Management and Comptroller Naval Air Systems Command

APX 064



Naval Education and Training Command Naval Inventory Control Point Naval Sea Systems Command Naval Supply Systems Command Naval Surface Warfare Center Navy O ce of the Chief of Human Resources Navy Public Works Center Navy Recruiting Command O ce of Naval Intelligence Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Bureau of Medicine and Surgery Naval Reserves

MMarine Corps

Marine Corps Reserve Marine Corps Systems Command

Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Forest Service Risk Management Agency

Department of Commerce

National Weather Service Patent & Trademark O ce United States Census Bureau

Department of Energy

APX 065



NNational Nuclear Security Administration

Department of Health & Human Services

Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services

National Institutes of Health

Indian Health Service

Department of Homeland Security

Customs & Border Protection Directorate of Preparedness Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Protective Service Immigration & Customs Enforcement Transportation Security Administration United States Citizenship & Immigration Services US-VISIT O ce of Policy U.S. Coast Guard

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Department of Housing and Urban Development Public and Indian Housing

Department of Interior

APX 066



NNational Park Service O ce of Inspector General

Department of Justice

Antitrust Division Bureau of Prisons Civil Rights Criminal Division Drug Enforcement Administration Executive O ce for the U.S. Attorneys Federal Bureau of Investigation Justice Management Division Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force United States Marshals Service

Department of Labor

Occupational Safety & Health Administration O ce of the Chief Information O cer

Department of State

Bureau of Consular Affairs Foreign Service Institute Population, Refugees, and Migration

Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration National Highway Tra c Safety Administration

APX 067



VOLPE Transportation System Center

DDepartment of Treasury

Comptroller of the Currency Internal Revenue Service United States Secret Service

Department of Veterans Affairs

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Bene t Administration Veterans Health Administration

General Services Administration

Federal Supply Service Federal Technology Service

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Central Intelligence Agency

Congressional Commission on China

Congressional Research Service

Director of National Intelligence

APX 068



FFederal Communications Commission

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Federal Trade Commission

Government Accountability O ce

Government Printing O ce

International Trade Commission

Library of Congress

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Pension Bene t Guaranty Corporation

Smithsonian Institution

U.S. Postal Service

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Social Security Administration

U.S. Army

APX 069



UU.S. Air Force

U.S. Coast Guard

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of State

U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. Marine Corps

U.S. Navy

U.S. Patent and Trademark O ce

City of Chicago

City of Colorado Springs

City of Palo Alto, CA

City of San Francisco

APX 070



GGeorgia Department of Transportation

Louisiana Department of Transportation

Montgomery County, MD

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

The list above does not include the many contracts Serco has with U. S. corporations,states, cities, or other companies. No one knows the true extent of the strangle-holdSerco has on America. If you pay attention closely you will notice that when a seriousdata management problem arises, it is usually Serco that has the contract to safeguardthat data.

SERCO’S FUTURE IN AMERICAIt is obvious to see from the presentation above that Serco has spread its tentacles intoevery aspect of the U. S. government and the U. S. military. Serco has also dominatedmany other industries in the U. S. economy and yet their name and in uence is littleknown or recognized. Any American, when presented with this information above, wouldimmediately conclude that there is no good reason to let Brits do what Americans can doquite nicely, thank you.

Why would we sell out our most sensitive data to a foreign country who has, quitefrankly, not really been our friend from the beginning. Indeed, it does look like theAmerican Revolution has not really ended and that the “Crown” still taxes every Americanfor business deals that the common citizen is not aware of. No American chooses“Britain First” when it comes to providing services for our military or government — thatmakes no sense at all.

APX 071



Serco is simply the ‘tip of the iceberg’ when it comes to British “interests” in America.Many of the old English, Dutch, and German bankers have bene ted greatly byinstitutions like the U. S. Federal Reserve, U. S. Central Banks, the World Bank, the WorldTrade Organization, and the International Monetary Fund. Once you consider the UK’spart in these multi-national (global) organizations, you can track billions of dollars owingout of America and into the pocket of the British Crown.

The British Crown “Agents” are indeed a long-standing set of monopolies that Americahas had to contend with since the founding of the British inspired Council on ForeignRelations, the chief body that creates U. S. foreign policy for the U. S. State Department.Britain is always considered to be our closest partner in all things war, militaryintelligence, and global domination. We share our military “intelligence” with the UK. But itmight surprise some people to learn that the British-American (Anglo-American)connection reaches deep into the pockets of U. S. tax payers through companies likeSerco.

Serco, and other foreign corporations are the usual “no-bid” contractors always selectedby the Senior Executive Service members throughout the federal government who makesure the status quo is not disturbed and that the “old boys” get their piece of the pie. Thistype of selling-out of America is an erosion of the U. S. Republic and an assault on the U.S. Constitution and the U. S. Bill of Rights. Tax-payers are being sold out to foreigncountries while services for U. S. soldiers decline and the data being managed by Sercoand others is consistently compromised.

It is time to re Serco and let Americans do the work and gain the bene t of receiving thehard-earned dollars of U. S. tax-payers. The Crown of England, the Bank of England, theCity of London, and British owned companies “NEED NOT APPLY.”

FFor Further Information on Serco, go to:

The American Intelligence Media is a digital resource for truth news creators all aroundthe world. We do the deep research for you and provide you resource materials so that

APX 072



you can educate and enlighten your audience with your unique talents and voice. Pleaserepost our article in any way you feel best to spread out this intel around the world.

Also link to this post below where we keep an ongoing dump of Serco material that isdi cult to nd on the internet:

Use these additional resources, including Abel Danger websites, to shine a big, bright,global light on this corruption. We are ushering in a new age of peace and prosperity.

.

SERCO Owns the World, | Big Brother Watch

SERCO Intel Dump Page

Join our movement

SERCO OWNS THE WORLD, | BIG BROTHER WATCH

APX 073



.

.

OMG Serco Wins Bid For Obamacare Contract, WAKE UP!!

.

This video was done in 2014. The YouTuber is astonished to nd how many corporationsare attached to Serco. Start the video at 3:12 mark. Then go to Muckety and see howdifferent the chart looks now.

Serco outsources to governments all over the world

OMG SERCO WINS BID FOR OBAMACARE CONTRACT

APX 074



Chrissy Chat - Lets Muckety Around Serco

.

Recommended resources:

GRETA: THE OBAMACARE SERCO DEAL SMELLS ROTTEN

CONGRESS BEGINS SCRUTINY OF OBAMACARE WEBSITE’SPROBLEMS

WHAT IS SERCO HIDING?

Electronic Tagging

APX 075



Serco Associated with The GEO Group

SERCO AND IMMIGRATION

SECURITY GIANT SERCO CHIEF RESIGNS

VICIOUS SERCO? UK PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ENTWINED INMAJOR FRAUD SCANDAL

G4S AND SERCO FACE £50 MILLION FRAUDINQUIRY

G4S and Serco woes deepen with British fraud investigation

PRESS THIS TWITTER FACEBOOK 230

GOOGLE

Reblog Like

8 bloggers like this.

Comments ADD YOURS35

APX 076



←Older Comments…

christopherearlstrunk on April 23, 2018 at 2:18 pm Reply

Good work!

In the best of all possible worlds, this is su cient for a beginning outline for 18 USC1961 according to https://www.scribd.com/document/106931000/USDOJ-RICO-Manual-of-Federal-Prosecutors-1993. THKS!

Still Cogitating!

Like

RRi-chard on April 23, 2018 at 2:30 pm Reply

Please consider 3i and Blackrock are the giants not SERCO and SES.

Like

R Seymour on May 18, 2018 at 9:50 am Reply

Good work! After you completely expose the British Crown angle in the plunder of USA, you mightexamine the JEWISH angle. As far as I can tell, it is far more destructive…..

http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/homeland-security-another-jewish-racket/

Like

Ri-chard on May 18, 2018 at 12:34 pm Reply

Who feeds the Crown/i believe it those who control movement of money and landownership. always follow the money and you will connects the dots to the JewishZionist Khazarian money changers. There is much info out there from those that chase SERCO and SES. they are small

1

2

3

4

APX 077



fry ans way too far away from the head of the snake. consider exploring 3i orBlackstone. As the feeder bags for the Crown – Note the in your face message of the3i logo> https://www.3i.com/ and there list of friendlie$ Jews and Zionisthttps://ir.blackstone.com/investors/events/default.aspx

Like

Our Spirit on May 18, 2018 at 12:36 pm

Send us YOUR research. Make sure to include actual documents and indictableevidence that proves these claims. We have our hands full right now with other trails.

Like

sorgfelt on May 18, 2018 at 11:59 am Reply

Please don’t equate SES with SERCO. SES is to civil service as o cers are to enlisted.SES are appointed by the President to manage the government and can be red atwill. Deep State members can be SES, but the reverse is not true.

Like

Our Spirit on May 18, 2018 at 12:29 pm Reply

If you have been following our research, this comment would not have beennecessary. Your assessment is naive and doesn’t capture the true purpose and intentof SES or Serco. SES has in ltrated our government as a separate unit. We haveposted the Plum Books and you can check out the names yourself – Mueller,Rosenstein, Freidrich, Page, Strzok, McCabe, Podesta….and soooo many more. Theyaward no-bid contracts to foreign aligned and owned Serco – which all tracks back tothe Crown Agents, the Golden Share, and the Brits. The good patriots of bothcountries are being controlled by evil forces of the Queen to the Pope. Put any namein our search bar and see what we have uncovered so far. And for those of you thatscream “the Queen is being controlled-it’s not her fault” then tell her that she needs tostep up and reveal her handlers.

Like

5

6

7

APX 078



sorgfelt on May 18, 2018 at 12:45 pm

I know some SES members. They basically got themselves promoted into thosepositions from civil service by making formal applications and being accepted by theDepartment for which they work. I am quite sure they have nothing to do with eitherSERCO or royalty.

Our Spirit on May 18, 2018 at 12:53 pm Reply

You are so wrong. SES is an enemy of We the People. They are a unit of governmentoutside of the rule of law, the constitution…they are obstructionists. They receiveclandestine training at Senior Executive Institute and they most certainly don’t tellYOU what they are up to. They are: Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Jeff Sessions,Lisa Page, Dabney Friedrich, Peter Strzok, Christopher Wray, Trey Gowdy, AndrewMcCabe, John Podesta….and we could go on. The list is long. But if you had beendoing your homework and research for yourself in the Plum Books, you would seethat they are the ‘stink of the swamp’….all the while giving no-bid contracts to Sercowhich is tied to the British Crown. They are more than Obama’s army; they are thehidden army of the British Crown.

We do our homework here at AIM4Truth. If you want to leave comments in the future,don’t be ignorant. Know what you are talking about.

←Older Comments…

·

Leave a Reply

Enter your comment here...Enter your comment here...

8

9

APX 079

The Hudson Institute

Washington, D.C.

11:07 A.M. EDT

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Ken, for that kind introduction. To the Members of the Board of

Trustees, to Dr. Michael Pillsbury, to our distinguished guests, and to all of you who, true to your

mission in this place, “think about the future in unconventional ways” –- it is an honor to be back at

the Hudson Institute.

For more than a half a century, this Institute has dedicated itself to “advancing global security,

prosperity, and freedom.” And while Hudson’s hometowns have changed over the years, one thing

has been constant: You have always advanced that vital truth, that American leadership lights the

way.

And today, speaking of leadership, allow me to begin by bringing greetings from a great champion

of American leadership at home and abroad –- I bring greetings from the 45th President of the

United States of America, President Donald Trump. (Applause.)

From early in this administration, President Trump has made our relationship with China and

President Xi a priority. On April 6th of last year, President Trump welcomed President Xi to Mar-a-

REMARKS

Remarks by Vice President Pence on theAdministration’s Policy Toward China

FOREIGN POLICY

Issued on: October 4, 2018

APX 080

Lago. On November 8th of last year, President Trump traveled to Beijing, where China’s leader

welcomed him warmly.

Over the course of the past two years, our President has forged a strong personal relationship with

the President of the People’s Republic of China, and they’ve worked closely on issues of common

interest, most importantly the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

But I come before you today because the American people deserve to know that, as we speak,

Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic, and military

tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the United States.

China is also applying this power in more proactive ways than ever before, to exert influence and

interfere in the domestic policy and politics of this country.

Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States has taken decisive action to respond to

China with American action, applying the principles and the policies long advocated in these halls.

In our National Security Strategy that the President Trump released last December, he described a

new era of “great power competition.” Foreign nations have begun to, as we wrote, “reassert their

influence regionally and globally,” and they are “contesting [America’s] geopolitical advantages and

trying [in essence] to change the international order in their favor.”

In this strategy, President Trump made clear that the United States of America has adopted a new

approach to China. We seek a relationship grounded in fairness, reciprocity, and respect for

sovereignty, and we have taken strong and swi action to achieve that goal.

As the President said last year on his visit to China, in his words, “we have an opportunity to

strengthen the relationship between our two countries and improve the lives of our citizens.” Our

vision of the future is built on the best parts of our past, when America and China reached out to

one another in a spirit of openness and friendship.

When our young nation went searching in the wake of the Revolutionary War for new markets for

our exports, the Chinese people welcomed American traders laden with ginseng and fur.

APX 081

When China su ered through indignities and exploitations during her so-called “Century of

Humiliation,” America refused to join in, and advocated the “Open Door” policy, so that we could

have freer trade with China, and preserve their sovereignty.

When American missionaries brought the good news to China’s shores, they were moved by the

rich culture of an ancient and vibrant people. And not only did they spread their faith, but those

same missionaries founded some of China’s first and finest universities.

When the Second World War arose, we stood together as allies in the fight against imperialism. And

in that war’s a ermath, America ensured that China became a charter member of the United

Nations, and a great shaper of the post-war world.

But soon a er it took power in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party began to pursue authoritarian

expansionism. It is remarkable to think that only five years a er our nations had fought together,

we fought each other in the mountains and valleys of the Korean Peninsula. My own father saw

combat on that frontier of freedom.

But not even the brutal Korean War could diminish our mutual desire to restore the ties that for so

long had bound our peoples together. China’s estrangement from the United States ended in 1972,

and, soon a er, we re-established diplomatic relations and began to open our economies to one

another, and American universities began training a new generation of Chinese engineers, business

leaders, scholars, and o icials.

A er the fall of the Soviet Union, we assumed that a free China was inevitable. Heady with

optimism at the turn of the 21st Century, America agreed to give Beijing open access to our

economy, and we brought China into the World Trade Organization.

Previous administrations made this choice in the hope that freedom in China would expand in all of

its forms -– not just economically, but politically, with a newfound respect for classical liberal

principles, private property, personal liberty, religious freedom — the entire family of human rights.

But that hope has gone unfulfilled.

The dream of freedom remains distant for the Chinese people. And while Beijing still pays lip

service to “reform and opening,” Deng Xiaoping’s famous policy now rings hollow.

APX 082

Over the past 17 years, China’s GDP has grown nine-fold; it’s become the second-largest economy

in the world. Much of this success was driven by American investment in China. And the Chinese

Communist Party has also used an arsenal of policies inconsistent with free and fair trade,

including tari s, quotas, currency manipulation, forced technology transfer, intellectual property

the , and industrial subsidies that are handed out like candy to foreign investment. These policies

have built Beijing’s manufacturing base, at the expense of its competitors -– especially the United

States of America.

China’s actions have contributed to a trade deficit with the United States that last year ran to $375

billion –- nearly half of our global trade deficit. As President Trump said just this week, in his words,

“We rebuilt China” over the last 25 years.

Now, through the “Made in China 2025” plan, the Communist Party has set its sights on controlling

90 percent of the world’s most advanced industries, including robotics, biotechnology, and artificial

intelligence. To win the commanding heights of the 21st century economy, Beijing has directed its

bureaucrats and businesses to obtain American intellectual property –- the foundation of our

economic leadership -– by any means necessary.

Beijing now requires many American businesses to hand over their trade secrets as the cost of

doing business in China. It also coordinates and sponsors the acquisition of American firms to gain

ownership of their creations. Worst of all, Chinese security agencies have masterminded the

wholesale the of American technology –- including cutting-edge military blueprints. And using

that stolen technology, the Chinese Communist Party is turning plowshares into swords on a

massive scale.

China now spends as much on its military as the rest of Asia combined, and Beijing has prioritized

capabilities to erode America’s military advantages on land, at sea, in the air, and in space. China

wants nothing less than to push the United States of America from the Western Pacific and attempt

to prevent us from coming to the aid of our allies. But they will fail.

Beijing is also using its power like never before. Chinese ships routinely patrol around the Senkaku

Islands, which are administered by Japan. And while China’s leader stood in the Rose Garden at the

White House in 2015 and said that his country had, and I quote, “no intention to militarize” the

South China Sea, today, Beijing has deployed advanced anti-ship and anti-air missiles atop an

archipelago of military bases constructed on artificial islands.

APX 083

China’s aggression was on display this week, when a Chinese naval vessel came within 45 yards of

the USS Decatur as it conducted freedom-of-navigation operations in the South China Sea, forcing

our ship to quickly maneuver to avoid collision. Despite such reckless harassment, the United

States Navy will continue to fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows and our

national interests demand. We will not be intimidated and we will not stand down. (Applause.)

America had hoped that economic liberalization would bring China into a greater partnership with

us and with the world. Instead, China has chosen economic aggression, which has in turn

emboldened its growing military.

Nor, as we had hoped, has Beijing moved toward greater freedom for its own people. For a time,

Beijing inched toward greater liberty and respect for human rights. But in recent years, China has

taken a sharp U-turn toward control and oppression of its own people.

Today, China has built an unparalleled surveillance state, and it’s growing more expansive and

intrusive – o en with the help of U.S. technology. What they call the “Great Firewall of China”

likewise grows higher, drastically restricting the free flow of information to the Chinese people.

And by 2020, China’s rulers aim to implement an Orwellian system premised on controlling virtually

every facet of human life — the so-called “Social Credit Score.” In the words of that program’s

o icial blueprint, it will “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven, while making it

hard for the discredited to take a single step.”

And when it comes to religious freedom, a new wave of persecution is crashing down on Chinese

Christians, Buddhists, and Muslims.

Last month, Beijing shut down one of China’s largest underground churches. Across the country,

authorities are tearing down crosses, burning bibles, and imprisoning believers. And Beijing has

now reached a deal with the Vatican that gives the avowedly atheist Communist Party a direct role

in appointing Catholic bishops. For China’s Christians, these are desperate times.

Beijing is also cracking down on Buddhism. Over the past decade, more than 150 Tibetan Buddhist

monks have lit themselves on fire to protest China’s repression of their beliefs and their culture.

And in Xinjiang, the Communist Party has imprisoned as many as one million Muslim Uyghurs in

government camps where they endure around-the-clock brainwashing. Survivors of the camps

APX 084

have described their experiences as a deliberate attempt by Beijing to strangle Uyghur culture and

stamp out the Muslim faith.

As history attests though, a country that oppresses its own people rarely stops there. And Beijing

also aims to extend its reach across the wider world. As Hudson’s own Dr. Michael Pillsbury has

written, “China has opposed the actions and goals of the U.S. government. Indeed, China is

building its own relationships with America’s allies and enemies that contradict any peaceful or

productive intentions of Beijing.”

In fact, China uses so-called “debt diplomacy” to expand its influence. Today, that country is

o ering hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure loans to governments from Asia to Africa to

Europe and even Latin America. Yet the terms of those loans are opaque at best, and the benefits

invariably flow overwhelmingly to Beijing.

Just ask Sri Lanka, which took on massive debt to let Chinese state companies build a port of

questionable commercial value. Two years ago, that country could no longer a ord its payments,

so Beijing pressured Sri Lanka to deliver the new port directly into Chinese hands. It may soon

become a forward military base for China’s growing blue-water navy.

Within our own hemisphere, Beijing has extended a lifeline to the corrupt and incompetent Maduro

regime in Venezuela that’s been oppressing its own people. They pledged $5 billion in questionable

loans to be repaid with oil. China is also that country’s single largest creditor, saddling the

Venezuelan people with more than $50 billion in debt, even as their democracy vanishes. Beijing is

also impacting some nations’ politics by providing direct support to parties and candidates who

promise to accommodate China’s strategic objectives.

And since last year alone, the Chinese Communist Party has convinced three Latin American

nations to sever ties with Taipei and recognize Beijing. These actions threaten the stability of the

Taiwan Strait, and the United States of America condemns these actions. And while our

administration will continue to respect our One China Policy, as reflected in the three joint

communiqués and the Taiwan Relations Act, America will always believe that Taiwan’s embrace of

democracy shows a better path for all the Chinese people. (Applause.)

Now these are only a few of the ways that China has sought to advance its strategic interests across

the world, with growing intensity and sophistication. Yet previous administrations all but ignored

APX 085

China’s actions. And in many cases, they abetted them. But those days are over.

Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States of America has been defending our interests

with renewed American strength.

We’ve been making the strongest military in the history of the world stronger still. Earlier this year,

President Trump signed into law the largest increase in our national defense since the days of

Ronald Reagan -– $716 billion to extend the strength of the American military to every domain.

We’re modernizing our nuclear arsenal. We’re fielding and developing new cutting-edge fighters

and bombers. We’re building a new generation of aircra carriers and warships. We’re investing as

never before in our armed forces. And this includes initiating the process to establish the United

States Space Force to ensure our continued dominance in space, and we’ve taken action to

authorize increased capability in the cyber world to build deterrence against our adversaries.

At President Trump’s direction, we’re also implementing tari s on $250 billion in Chinese goods,

with the highest tari s specifically targeting the advanced industries that Beijing is trying to

capture and control. And as the President has also made clear, we will levy even more tari s, with

the possibility of substantially more than doubling that number, unless a fair and reciprocal deal is

made. (Applause.)

These actions — exercises in American strength — have had a major impact. China’s largest stock

exchange fell by 25 percent in the first nine months of this year, in large part because our

administration has been standing strong against Beijing’s trade practices.

As President Trump has made clear, we don’t want China’s markets to su er. In fact, we want them

to thrive. But the United States wants Beijing to pursue trade policies that are free, fair, and

reciprocal. And we will continue to stand and demand that they do. (Applause.)

Sadly, China’s rulers, thus far, have refused to take that path. The American people deserve to

know: In response to the strong stand that President Trump has taken, Beijing is pursuing a

comprehensive and coordinated campaign to undermine support for the President, our agenda,

and our nation’s most cherished ideals.

APX 086

I want to tell you today what we know about China’s actions here at home — some of which we’ve

gleaned from intelligence assessments, some of which are publicly available. But all of which are

fact.

As I said before, as we speak, Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach to advance its

influence and benefit its interests. It’s employing this power in more proactive and coercive ways to

interfere in the domestic policies of this country and to interfere in the politics of the United States.

The Chinese Communist Party is rewarding or coercing American businesses, movie studios,

universities, think tanks, scholars, journalists, and local, state, and federal o icials.

And worst of all, China has initiated an unprecedented e ort to influence American public opinion,

the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections. To put it

bluntly, President Trump’s leadership is working; and China wants a di erent American President.

There can be no doubt: China is meddling in America’s democracy. As President Trump said just last

week, we have, in his words, “found that China has been attempting to interfere in our upcoming

[midterm] election[s].”

Our intelligence community says that “China is targeting U.S. state and local governments and

o icials to exploit any divisions between federal and local levels on policy. It’s using wedge issues,

like trade tari s, to advance Beijing’s political influence.”

In June, Beijing itself circulated a sensitive document, entitled “Propaganda and Censorship

Notice.” It laid out its strategy. It stated that China must, in their words, “strike accurately and

carefully, splitting apart di erent domestic groups” in the United States of America.

To that end, Beijing has mobilized covert actors, front groups, and propaganda outlets to shi

Americans’ perception of Chinese policy. As a senior career member of our intelligence community

told me just this week, what the Russians are doing pales in comparison to what China is doing

across this country. And the American people deserve to know it.

Senior Chinese o icials have also tried to influence business leaders to encourage them to

condemn our trade actions, leveraging their desire to maintain their operations in China. In one

APX 087

recent example, China threatened to deny a business license for a major U.S. corporation if they

refused to speak out against our administration’s policies.

And when it comes to influencing the midterms, you need only look at Beijing’s tari s in response

to ours. The tari s imposed by China to date specifically targeted industries and states that would

play an important role in the 2018 election. By one estimate, more than 80 percent of U.S. counties

targeted by China voted for President Trump and I in 2016; now China wants to turn these voters

against our administration.

And China is also directly appealing to the American voters. Last week, the Chinese government

paid to have a multipage supplement inserted into the Des Moines Register –- the paper of record of

the home state of our Ambassador to China, and a pivotal state in 2018 and 2020. The supplement,

designed to look like the news articles, cast our trade policies as reckless and harmful to Iowans.

Fortunately, Americans aren’t buying it. For example, American farmers are standing with this

President and are seeing real results from the strong stands that he’s taken, including this week’s

U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, where we’ve substantially opened North American markets to U.S.

products. The USMCA is a great win for American farmers and American manufacturers. (Applause.)

But China’s actions aren’t focused solely on influencing our policies and politics. Beijing is also

taking steps to exploit its economic leverage, and the allure of their large marketplace, to advance

its influence over American businesses.

Beijing now requires American joint ventures that operate in China to establish what they call

“party organizations” within their company, giving the Communist Party a voice –- and perhaps a

veto -– in hiring and investment decisions.

Chinese authorities have also threatened U.S. companies that depict Taiwan as a distinct

geographic entity, or that stray from Chinese policy on Tibet. Beijing compelled Delta Airlines to

publicly apologize for not calling Taiwan a “province of China” on its website. And it pressured

Marriott to fire a U.S. employee who merely liked a tweet about Tibet.

And Beijing routinely demands that Hollywood portray China in a strictly positive light. It punishes

studios and producers that don’t. Beijing’s censors are quick to edit or outlaw movies that criticize

China, even in minor ways. For the movie, “World War Z,” they had to cut the script’s mention of a

APX 088

virus because it originated in China. The movie, “Red Dawn” was digitally edited to make the

villains North Korean, not Chinese.

But beyond business and entertainment, the Chinese Communist Party is also spending billions of

dollars on propaganda outlets in the United States and, frankly, around the world.

China Radio International now broadcasts Beijing-friendly programs on over 30 U.S. outlets, many

in major American cities. The China Global Television Network reaches more than 75 million

Americans, and it gets its marching orders directly from its Communist Party masters. As China’s

top leader put it during a visit to the network’s headquarters, and I quote, “The media run by the

Party and the government are propaganda fronts and must have the Party as their surname.”

It’s for those reasons and that reality that, last month, the Department of Justice ordered that

network to register as a foreign agent.

The Communist Party has also threatened and detained the Chinese family members of American

journalists who pry too deep. And it’s blocked the websites of U.S. media organizations and made it

harder for our journalists to get visas. This happened a er the New York Times published

investigative reports about the wealth of some of China’s leaders.

But the media isn’t the only place where the Chinese Communist Party seeks to foster a culture of

censorship. The same is true across academia.

I mean, look no further than the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, of which there are

more than 150 branches across America’s campuses. These groups help organize social events for

some of the more than 430,000 Chinese nationals studying in the United States. They also alert

Chinese consulates and embassies when Chinese students, and American schools, stray from the

Communist Party line.

At the University of Maryland, a Chinese student recently spoke at her graduation of what she

called, and I quote, the “fresh air of free speech” in America. The Communist Party’s o icial

newspaper swi ly chastised her. She became the victim of a firestorm of criticism on China’s

tightly-controlled social media, and her family back home was harassed. As for the university itself,

its exchange program with China — one of the nation’s most extensive — suddenly turned from a

flood to a trickle.

APX 089

China exerts academic pressure in other ways, as well. Beijing provides generous funding to

universities, think tanks, and scholars, with the understanding that they will avoid ideas that the

Communist Party finds dangerous or o ensive. China experts in particular know that their visas will

be delayed or denied if their research contradicts Beijing’s talking points.

And even scholars and groups who avoid Chinese funding are targeted by that country, as the

Hudson Institute found out firsthand. A er you o ered to host a speaker Beijing didn’t like, your

website su ered a major cyberattack, originating from Shanghai. The Hudson Institute knows

better than most that the Chinese Communist Party is trying to undermine academic freedom and

the freedom of speech in America today.

These and other actions, taken as a whole, constitute an intensifying e ort to shi American public

opinion and policy away from the “America First” leadership of President Donald Trump.

But our message to China’s rulers is this: This President will not back down. (Applause.) The

American people will not be swayed. And we will continue to stand strong for our security and our

economy, even as we hope for improved relations with Beijing.

Our administration is going to continue to act decisively to protect America’s interests, American

jobs, and American security.

As we rebuild our military, we will continue to assert American interests across the Indo-Pacific.

As we respond to China’s trade practices, we will continue to demand an economic relationship

with China that is free, fair, and reciprocal. We will demand that Beijing break down its trade

barriers, fulfill its obligations, fully open its economy — just as we have opened ours.

We’ll continue to take action against Beijing until the the of American intellectual property ends

once and for all. And we will continue to stand strong until Beijing stops the predatory practice of

forced technology transfer. We will protect the private property interests of American enterprise.

(Applause.)

And to advance our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific, we’re building new and stronger bonds

with nations that share our values across the region, from India to Samoa. Our relationships will

flow from a spirit of respect built on partnership, not domination.

APX 090

We’re forging new trade deals on a bilateral basis, just as last week President Trump signed an

improved trade deal with South Korea. And we will soon begin historic negotiations for a bilateral

free-trade deal with Japan. (Applause.)

I’m also pleased to report that we’re streamlining international development and finance

programs. We’ll be giving foreign nations a just and transparent alternative to China’s debt-trap

diplomacy. In fact, this week, President Trump will sign the BUILD Act into law.

Next month, it will be my privilege to represent the United States in Singapore and Papua New

Guinea, at ASEAN and APEC. There, we will unveil new measures and programs to support a free

and open Indo-Pacific. And on behalf of the President, I will deliver the message that America’s

commitment to the Indo-Pacific has never been stronger. (Applause.)

Closer to home, to protect our interests, we’ve recently strengthened CFIUS — the Committee on

Foreign Investment — heightening our scrutiny of Chinese investment in America to protect our

national security from Beijing’s predatory actions.

And when it comes to Beijing’s malign influence and interference in American politics and policy,

we will continue to expose it, no matter the form it takes. We will work with leaders at every level of

society to defend our national interests and most cherished ideals. The American people will play

the decisive role — and, in fact, they already are.

As we gather here, a new consensus is rising across America. More business leaders are thinking

beyond the next quarter, and thinking twice before diving into the Chinese market if it means

turning over their intellectual property or abetting Beijing’s oppression. But more must follow suit.

For example, Google should immediately end development of the “Dragonfly” app that will

strengthen Communist Party censorship and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers.

(Applause.)

It’s also great to see more journalists reporting the truth without fear or favor, digging deep to find

where China is interfering in our society, and why. And we hope that American and global news

organizations will continue to join this e ort on an increasing basis.

More scholars are also speaking out forcefully and defending academic freedom, and more

universities and think tanks are mustering the courage to turn away Beijing’s easy money,

APX 091

recognizing that every dollar comes with a corresponding demand. And we’re confident that their

ranks will grow.

And across the nation, the American people are growing in vigilance, with a newfound appreciation

for our administration’s actions and the President’s leadership to reset America’s economic and

strategic relationship with China. Americans stand strong behind a President that’s putting America

first.

And under President Trump’s leadership, I can assure you, America will stay the course. China

should know that the American people and their elected o icials in both parties are resolved.

As our National Security Strategy states: We should remember that “Competition does not always

mean hostility,” nor does it have to. The President has made clear, we want a constructive

relationship with Beijing where our prosperity and security grow together, not apart. While Beijing

has been moving further away from this vision, China’s rulers can still change course and return to

the spirit of reform and opening that characterize the beginning of this relationship decades ago.

The American people want nothing more; and the Chinese people deserve nothing less.

The great Chinese storyteller Lu Xun o en lamented that his country, and he wrote, “has either

looked down at foreigners as brutes, or up to them as saints,” but never “as equals.” Today, America

is reaching out our hand to China. And we hope that soon, Beijing will reach back with deeds, not

words, and with renewed respect for America. But be assured: we will not relent until our

relationship with China is grounded in fairness, reciprocity, and respect for our sovereignty.

(Applause.)

There is an ancient Chinese proverb that reads, “Men see only the present, but heaven sees the

future.” As we go forward, let us pursue a future of peace and prosperity with resolve and faith.

Faith in President Trump’s leadership and vision, and the relationship that he has forged with

China’s president. Faith in the enduring friendship between the American people and the Chinese

people. And Faith that heaven sees the future — and by God’s grace, America and China will meet

that future together.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

END

APX 092

APX 093

Warren County Board Of Elections 1340 State Route 9 Lake George, NY 12845

.,~if!~ •. • .. * •.. •

CHR~STOPP.ER EARL STRu~K 1<': ~ HARiHS i\V£ :.AKF. I.UZER~E NY 12846

i284b$i721 ROOi , 11111 JJ 1,, 1,11, 1,1 "" 11 ,,, h, J Ill• i •111 11 J 1 ,,,,,,

APX 094

•••••• • • •. • • • •• • • • •••••••••••••••• • • ••••• I

OFFICE

-I s 6

~ 00MPTR0UER ATTOilNEY UNrTED STAlES ~~~ STATESENATOI! GOVERNOR (Vdll ""ON£) GENERAL SENATOI! (:ZiotlllltricQ (45111 DISTRICT) (V""' ONCE) j !VQ41> lot ONE) !'/Ole loo ONE) (Vooe tQ< ONE) (Voeo 1o< ONE!

loa.tOCAA11C r OEWOC:AATIC (l CO.IOCIIAToc ...., DEMOcAAllC ' ' !CCI.IOCAAllC r IOCMOCAATIC (- ' Andrew M Cuomo •A ..J 2A ...- ~ j 1 .... \...' . .. J ... . J ,..,....._, · Thomas P.

1Letitia A. Kirsten E. Tedra L. Emily L.

A* ~Jtoc..~~ul DINapoli 1James Gillibrand Cobb Martz

I loiEMUI:fiOfASSfiAillY

(11411> OISTM:l) tV\"'t~h~~~~

- - -------'...:..::.. PI:I'U!I\.ICNC • r•, Jm'UIIUC/o.N C) IW'OOUCAII ( AEI'Ufll.I<Wj ( REI'VIlUC-'N '\ IW'ii9UCAio

Marc Molinaro •a '- m '- . .. - Chele .,. J . sa ,__, . ~ _ . """'?"'...,. .

1Jo.nathan Ke1th jChiavacci

1Ehse M. EliZabeth 0 C. Dame I G.

m:l't.~'i )

REI'tJ8<1CN< 'Ill ·

8 ~ I~JJ~~ Tnchter Wofford Fartey Stefanik uttle stec

-

----- lc.ot<sf.R'IATMc ~ CQISiEII'"l\VE .- COI<SEI!IIAIN£ '- COO<Ii'IIVAl\VE - COHSfJM\IlVE ~ I <XliiSBIVATIVt ( 1CONSatvAilJf •"" - Marc Molinaro •c ..... zc ._ x: '-· Chele .c\....· sc ... ) ,.; I cc ·-·

1·r,-.- . Jo_nathan Keith 'chiavaccl Elise~- Elizabeth O'C.I Daniel G - C t pa.~~~ Tnchter Wofford Fartey Stefamk Little Stec

1----------='--= .,GRGEN "lGR££1< "'GR£EN (' l<Jitt-bo -,I - IHowieHawkins ID I...I M rk •o ~· M- h I , .. }I L sol .... .._.. a 1c ae ynn - D <P t.~~..__,. Dunlea Sussman Kahn 1

-~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~-~ o~~ ~ -~ , ~~ J

~ AndrewM Cuomo •• ·--' lf ·.J ~ •e . I !h i Ill! . 1'1!\.. ~""' ...... .,......_ · Thomas P. Letitia A.

1Kirsten E. Tedra L Emily l. Kathryn K.

- E!fi l~ ... lf.l,x£~ul !DiNapoli 1James Gillibrand ,Cobb Martz •Wilson 1---arncc ,~, INOCPO,OE>;.:t. () • lOE;Pf'olnFN<CF (l •uPfHDEHC£ I'"' ~ ~~~ ~f l ~INll 0 ~~ M. Cuomo •• .._. Thomas P. " '-' letitia A. JF Kirsten E. "' ·~ Elise M. SF ' Elizabeth O~C. Daniel G. " ~~ •• ti,estiUI DiNapoli James Gllllbrand iStefanik Little Stec

- I WOOAilH'S BlUAUlY 0 vG~E~tS EoUAUtY 01 WOUfH'S EOlJI.I.m' C• '.....,...,.. eo<W.rrr l) ~ 6fl~ M. Cuomo 'G Thomas P, 2G Kirsten E. -10 Tedra L. >G · 1 -~~ ~ r~,x£~ul DiNapoli ,GiOibrand Cobb

I!£J'CIRU ...... -011>1 r ~ ~ «£tUtu r RE><>W

-~IMarcMolinaro •ij -" "' ~' .,..• Chele .., ..) . . ,.,......._., 1Thomas P. Nancy B. Chiavacci Ehse M.

- H ~ /JI~~ DiNapo~ Sliwa ,Far1ey Stefanik

-~- l.ieA.Miner uOJ I - ·~~~c~lpe

.. -- - UOfJ(l~"f

- I I ~JI¥.§.harpe r lJ '-' - Andrew C. Hollister

t"tlf\l,•IIJUW«~ --ueERT-

Cruger E. Gallaudet

-~·~~ u ·-...J ·' JJ I

Christopher 8 . !Garvey

=·--..... ~-- ~ r - 'w.-

- f OF~itc&Al. BAU.OT f(Mt-ntl' oecaAL «u!"t;T10H A_.lllrQ · .._.......,a., 2011 ST.-."R. OF NOf YORK.; COUNTY 0' W&JtRat

~, """''"" ll ,. Elizabeth ITC.

tittle

j- ........

,connie Goedert

j-

I

COUNT (Vol!

aa <.

l ""'·~.o gt«pc:lfjt!tffF!UC!f"..l_Q!&IM,t,QI

~~=;'.~.,._-.......... ~-· .... ,_.liii!Jt,t.~ ......... . lti.I ......... ,._.~-·----.................. J,..,....... ... -w._. ... ~ ... ~~~ ................ _.._ ~~=~-=r~:::.::-.::=:::.=E:E::=~~~:-:=~::.:...--:..-:.:= lhl····-....... ~,._.,._II'Ut ............................ c.:c.. ............. ttf .... ....., ...... _ ............. l,.....~.7 ..... ..,...., w,_,..,_.. • ......,.o.-.---. ... -... ....... ...,..,.. ...... ......,.,...,. ...... -. .... ...._

••••••• •I• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I

APX 095

FROM: (Complete Address)

c~~t~ (JJ J1tZM wr tit ~f ~~~ Ltu<\T L<.rlme~ ~

1 ~b'L/£

ELECTION MATERIAL - PLEASE EXPEDITE

I ..... ,...,.,.. ..... ..,. .... ,

-tr - ··..sAiiroos.- ~

))· *~·- .

1 ••• 11 .. 1.11 .. 1 •• 1 •• 1.1.1.11 ••• 1

BOARD OF ELECTIONS WARREN COUNTY MUNICIPAL CENTER

1340 STATE ROUTE 9 LAKE GEORGE, NY 12845

\ I

r : pr--ii- :

L~ .... , ......

APX 096

L ABSENTEE BALLOT IIII/11111/IIIIJIII/111111/II!II/IIIIIII/1111111111//III/11111/III/ Ill/ Ill/

20!8 GENERA• ID .. e:r~cn0~ . : l05a740 007/000!0n< · · November 06, .,018 Sen : n~s Conq· O~;keLuc~rne • 000, 002

• L Asm : l J 4

STRUNK CHR l4l • • !STOi'P.ER ZioRL

HARRJS AVE LAKe; LUZ:ERI'JE NY

1284 6 crv/P£p

COUNTY; WARREN

County o "VVant=~n'--------

Democratic Inspector 1:1 Republican Inspector 1:1 (Inspectors must check and marl< voter's poll record and Initial in boxes above.)

Party Enrollment for Primary

APX 097

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ G'G~~~~o r CCM~OLLER I Ano;NEY f UNITEO~Ares I ~~g~~~1~ 1 STATES~ATOR 1 MA~:P: I

I GENERAL SENATOR ( 1 D= (<15th DISTRICT) I 14th DISTR Cl) l GOVERNOR (Voto for ONE) (\Iota ror ONE) [ (Vote fOf ONE) 2 st (Vote lor ONE) (I 1

(Vole ONCE) [ I (Vole far ON ) ~ (Vote for ONE)

~E

- QEt.!OCRATlC 0 ! DEMOCRATIC 0 I UEMOCRATIC 0 I OEMcC>'<ATlC 0 DE .. OCRAT1C 0 ' DEMOCRATIC 0 ---- ~."~e.!' M. Cuomo rA Thomas P. 2A Letitia A. ~ Kirsten E. ' A Tedra L. ... :Emily L. SA r --;, * lt£,aJ!,)Y,£.,tlgshul DiNapoli :James IGillibrand Cobb Martz I - REPUBUCAN • · ' REPVBUCAI< . , REPUB).ICAN 0 REPUBLICAN • REPIJOUCAN • I REPUSUCAN . , REPUBUCAN .ria I REPUEUCAN

~ t.Aatc Molinaro '" :>aW 38 . IChele •• sa •• ~ I , • • I 10\ • ..,...... fJonathan ,Keith Chiavacci

1Eiise M. Elizabeth O'C. !Daniel G. Connie

Bill ~JJJ!~,!i!!~ lTrichter Wofford Farley ~Stefanik !Little 1stec ' Goedert

-- ==.:.CON. S~VATfVE . I l QONSERVAT1VE 0 CONSERVATIVE (~) l cONSERVATlVE 0 CONSERVA1WE I) CO~SERVAlWE u- I CONSERVATIVE 0 -= Marc Molinaro tc \ I 2C JC ~ [Chele •c . sc \ _ ' . s,c . 7C

'""""""'._ ,Jonathan Keith Chiavacci IEhse M. IEhzabeth 0 C. IOamel G.

C - Julie Killian IT richter ~Wofford Farley Stefanik Little lstec ~ fOR ltfLITE:tWii 00\IEAM?R

------"'--"''-fGREE~ • GREEN 0 GREEN 0 GREEN ()

~ !;iq~.,..Hawkins ,oU Mark •o Michael >o ILynn so -

~ G;l ~j~J-~. """'"""" ;ounlea Sussman I Kahn --- - 'WOR~NGFAMtUes ~ ) ~KiNGFAMJUES 0 ~JNGfAM\WES n WOAAINGFAMIUES 0 'M:>fiKINGF,A,MIUES 0 [ WORKINGfAMIL.IES 0 I INORKiNGFAMILIE5 0

~ Andrew M Cuomo 1E ·~ 2E JE

1 I I JE 5E 6E 7E

••'""''"'- · Thomas P. Letitia A. .Kirsten E. edra L. :Emily L. Kathryn K. E .bli ~!py.,.,9.Ji%:hul DiNapoli James Gillibrand Cobb Martz ~Wilson

--- - - lfiiOEPEN.OENCE 0 INDEPENDENCE n INDEPENDENCE ("\ INDEPENDENCE 0 INOEPE.NO!:NOE 0 INDEPENDENCE 0 INDEPENOE/IICE (J .... ~~- · Thomas P. Letitia A. Ktrsten E. Elise M. Elizabeth O'C. jDaniel G. ~ An1rew M Cuomo •• >F ~ " 1 <F •• •• 1•

F 'i- ~~Y..sf0ov~ul DiNapoli . James Gillibrand Stefanik Little IStec ' ----1-"''-i WOMENS EQUAliTY (J v,oMEN'S EQUAt.rrY <) WOME"S EOUAUTY ll ~MEN'S EOUI\U-r.: 0 __._. ~.rtf~ M. Cuomo 10 Thomas P.20 Kirsten E. •G · edra L. '" ~ ~ ~lb¥~~.cashul !DiNapoli Glllibrand Cobb - - --"''--1 REF~I M 0 l REFORM · ) REFORM ~ REFORM .~ REFORM

~ Mac Molinaro '" 2Ht_ ' " '· ) Chele .• "U . ""' """" !Thomas P. Nancy B. Chiavacci 1Ehse M.

H ~ ~""U.IJ111.~~~ . !DiNapoli Sliwa Farley .Stefanik

__... i[~~J.nieA. Miner 1•1 )

..--; ~ M\~,.'!~~lpe I ----- UBE~tARIAN 0 LfBERt ARIAN (l __. k.,a.gy,.§.harpe 1J !Cruger E. 2J

~ ~ ~ue'1J~~£Jiollister IGallaudet --~--1 I

I

......... ,..........,

~ I

ii!NERAL ELECTION A-ENT£1! - November 061 2018

liBERTARIAN •

ChristopherJJs: I Garvey

lwrill>'n

,_ -STATE Of Ne¥1 YORK, COUNTY OF WAfUt.EN

•H 0 I RffORM • <) !Elizabeth d'c. Little

........ lw. ..... :~~~

COUNTY CORONER (Vote for TWO)

ea. 1 REPUeUcAN

Terry Comeau

-·

•••

~ ~~Do(rll~ lf'l!llflo':iod•~~·t~fllllttllf>o ... ._...._~blt~jlllroalbt ...... bfc'o'ldf.,.lf*~CI!.ittl;lti;l~~"" '

il!l!ll!llbii~~~~,--018~1J'11.df•~~.~· ..t;oq~P"tw.._""'*'.,..,.,._ "-N1~.aiii'I•WMI'WII!Nt·-~ .. or.-allh!_.,ft .. f1;1114ft:.e 1!12110n,..,tallot>!U.\do!IIN...... II'JIIiMII".,.._P!.,.,..N""*v ... ~lt-.• .. lfiiiPI

(G l ryrwkw,OI" .... -.ar~Nr\ ... o.Al,cillho8CIInf_.,£ltdml~l61t)16"f..fo45&1tf~""~lo..._,,I'W!W'~, Dv~~JORI!"'''CfMIII1It"'';l;>il1lll:llti¥'!Wllt.,_UielloOIIWM'lllflo Etw.••fi'CifhGllol'l\o1Y....,...,.OMIDI'I'!'il _.. f'!>wlo~IIWy-,wrl)olil;)l ff VWti'IIIII••IMI.Ii!llll'~tn.IIIIIIIGLI:I'\III!Il'llo~'fO.I!l~~'fO.I~I;Ibl.llnll(lld~ .. rwwbt!lul ""* -..-.,Nil'•~IHifl:lltopr! l...,.rliN'II~;~~W .... {')f•bo~......,~·~t.r)o.,..lfUo!•~~,....l<lltll._.u<Uo~~•tard:n~-w~llt'N~fl~mwtortwl u.,.tr~&~tr1fi¥ (~11111c!r~Ul D~

I •• •I• •••••••••••••••••••••••••• •I• •••••••••• I

SA

MPLE B

ALLO

TIN

STR

UC

TIO

NS

:(1

) M

ark

only

with a

writing

inst

rum

ent

pro

vided

by

the

Boa

rd

of E

lect

ions.

(2) To

vot

e fo

r a

candid

ate

whos

e nam

e is

print

ed o

n t

his

bal

lot

fill i

n t

he

oval

to

the

right

of t

he

candid

ate,

like

: ●(3

) To

vot

e fo

r a

per

son w

hos

e nam

e is

not

print

ed o

n t

his

bal

lot

write

or

stam

p h

is o

r her

nam

e in

the

des

ignat

ed W

rite

-In a

rea

for

that

off

ice.

(4)

Any

oth

er

mark

or

wri

tin

g, o

r any

era

sure

mad

e

on

th

is b

allo

t o

uts

ide t

he

voti

ng

ova

ls o

r b

lan

k s

pac

es

pro

vid

ed

fo

r vo

tin

g w

ill vo

id

this

en

tire

ballo

t.(5

) D

o not

ove

rvot

e. If yo

u se

lect

a

gre

ater

num

ber

of ca

ndid

ates

th

an t

her

e ar

e va

canci

es to

be

fille

d, y

our

bal

lot

will

be

void

for

th

at p

ublic

off

ice

or p

ropos

itio

n.

(6) If y

ou t

ear,

or d

efac

e, o

r w

rongly

mar

k th

is b

allo

t, r

etur

n

it a

nd o

bta

in a

not

her

. Do

not

at

tem

pt

to c

orre

ct m

ista

kes

on

the

bal

lot

by

mak

ing e

rasu

res

or

cros

s ou

ts. E

rasu

res

or c

ross

out

s m

ay in

valid

ate

all o

r par

t of

you

r bal

lot.

Prior

to

subm

itting y

our

bal

lot,

if y

ou m

ake

a m

ista

ke in

co

mple

ting t

he

bal

lot

or w

ish

to c

han

ge

your

bal

lot

choi

ces,

yo

u m

ay o

bta

in a

nd c

omple

te a

new

bal

lot.

You

hav

e a

right

to a

re

pla

cem

ent

bal

lot

upon

ret

urn o

f th

e or

igin

al b

allo

t.(7

) Rev

iew

bot

h s

ides

of th

e bal

lot.

(8) A

fter

com

ple

ting t

he

bal

lot,

in

sert

it in

to t

he

bal

lot

scan

ner

an

d w

ait

for

the

not

ice

that

you

r bal

lot

has

bee

n s

ucce

ssfu

lly

scan

ned

. If no

such

not

ice

appea

rs, s

eek

the

assi

stan

ce o

f an

ele

ctio

n in

spec

tor

.N

OTE: D

o n

ot

let

anyo

ne t

ake

your

ballot

to t

he s

can

ner.

UL

ST

ER

CO

UN

TY

Gen

eral

Ele

ctio

nN

ove

mb

er 6

, 201

8

SH

EET# 1

63

Ele

cti

on

Dis

tric

tsC

ou

nty

of U

lste

r1

9th

Co

ng

res

sio

na

l Dis

tric

t4

6th

Se

na

tori

al D

istr

ict

10

3rd

As

se

mb

ly D

istr

ict

Cit

y o

f: K

ing

sto

nW

ard

1E

.D.(

s):

1 -

3W

ard

2E

.D.(

s):

1 -

3W

ard

3E

.D.(

s):

1 -

3W

ard

4E

.D.(

s):

1, 2

Wa

rd 5

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 3

Wa

rd 6

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 3

Wa

rd 7

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 3

Wa

rd 8

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 3

Wa

rd 9

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 3

Tow

n o

f: E

so

pu

sE

.D.(

s):

1 -

7To

wn

of:

Hu

rle

yE

.D.(

s):

1 -

8To

wn

of:

Kin

gs

ton

E.D

.(s

): 1

Tow

n o

f: M

arb

leto

wn

E.D

.(s

): 1

- 7

Tow

n o

f: U

lste

rE

.D.(

s):

1 -

14

APX 098

APX 099

WebCivil Supreme - Case Search ResultsReport created on: October 24, 2018 at 01:32 PM

5 Case(s) Match Your Search. Page 1 of 1 pages

CourtIndexNumber

CaseStatus Plaintiff

PlaintiffFirm Defendant

DefendantFirm

AppearanceDate

Justice

1 AlbanySupremeCourt

5888-02. Disposed Van Allen H. William VanAllen

Patricia LMurray

08/25/2003 THOMAS J.MCNAMARA

DemocraticState Comm


3044-04 Disposed Van Allen Young Sommer CorporationCounsel

07/19/2004 LOUIS C. BENZACity Of AlbanyZoning


1433-12 Disposed Van Allen H. William VanAllen, SRL

Eric T.Schneiderman

07/26/2012 ROGER D.MCDONOUGH

MSilver


1787-12 Disposed Van Allen H. William VanAllen SRL

NYS Board OfElections

08/20/2012 RICHARD M.PLATKIN

MNYS Board OfElections


6418-13 Disposed Van Allen H. William VanAllen, SRL

NYS AttorneyGeneral

08/25/2016 KIMBERLY A.O'CONNOR

NYS SecretaryOf State, et al

APX 100

APX 101

Donald J. Trump Pr·csiden t & Chief E:.xecul ive The Wmle House J6oo Pennsylvania A~enue NvV Washington, D.C. 20500

202-456-1414

Dear Mr. President:

Request& Win-Win Tax Rejbtnt Strategy

My fellow Leader Technologies, Inc. shareholders (Columbus, Ohio) and I ask for your help in getting paid for a great benefit that we provided to the U.S. government for which we have not been paid. I sent you my registered Miller Act Notice previously.

This unprecedented situation m·cates an el1ual1y unprecedented revenue opportunity for the U.S. government for which there does not appear to be a downside. Allow me to explain.

The federal government confiscated Leade1''s social networking invention fmm the very moment we met our patent attorney James P. Chandler, III in 2000. See Miller Act Notice, pp. 6, l5· Even though Chandler was Leacler's allorney, he did nol arrange for the government to license J .euder's invention. fnstead, the federal government silently stole Leader's invention for ils use as well as for lhe benefit o[ ils mmtary-industrial complex partners.

These collaborators then created the "social networking" market out of whole cloth using Leader's invention as jls foundation. This e(fort bas been heavily financed by C.I.A. In-Q-Tel and IBM. The social networking market that emerged is valued today at over $4 trill ion with 7· 7 billion users. 1

A Win-Win Tax Reform Strategy

The lrulh is lhal, Mr. Presidenl, both Lhe federal governmenl and lhelechnology world have become accustomed to enjoying the bene fils of social networking without paying for it. Remarkably, this historical injustice to Leader Technologies creates a tremendous tax reform opportunity.

1 Social apps users now use 30 apps per month. See Sarah Perez. (May 4, 2017). Report: Smartphone owners are using 9 apps per day, 30 per month. Tech Crunch. https ://techcrunch .com/2017/05/04 Ire po rt-sma rtphone-owners-a re-using-9·a pps-per-da y-30-permonth/. However, for the purposes of this discussion we will use a 30:1ratio and use 7.7 billion users and not 7.7x30=231 billion users.

APX 102

PresidentDonaldJ. Trump Page2

The governme nt has never tapped into the reve nue stream pot entia l that socia l networking ••cpresents.

The technology world has generated literally trillions of dollars in value from social networking, and yet bas never paid a dime in fees to Leader Technologies for using their inventions.

I propose a win-win solution that genemtcs substaotjal Oe\>\1 revenues for Lhe fedeml government and properly compensates l.eader for the tremendous value we have provided:

•· Fo r ward-looking Consume r Use Fee@ $N( useJ'fm onth:

We 1n'Opose that the federal government surcharge each social networking provider (''Providct·") a "Consumer Usc Fee'' of $N/usct•/month for each user worldvvide. This fee shall be paid to the collecting federal agency each month by the Provider. The payment shtlll be comprised of:

so% from the Provider

so% from the Technology suppliers to Provider pro rata (e.g., hardware, software, firmware)

So for example, a $2.50/month surcharge will generate $231 billion per year in revenue for lhe feueml government

The surcharge shall be collected fTom the Providers. A precedent collection model is the Uruversal Service Fund (USF) (fee) collecled by Lhe Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to subsidize phone rates fot' rut-a) phone companies, rural healthcare, libraries and schools. The 50% paid by the Technology suppliers shall be determined by lhe Provider.

2. J•'orward-looking Leader Innovation Surcharge@ $2.0 0 /u ser/month:

[n addHion, for the privilege of using Leader's innovations, each Provider shaJI collect and pay a $2/month blanket 1 icense surcharge from each user for all social apps used by lhal person on aU devkes. Thjs annual fee of $185 billion per yean~m be paid to Leader forlhe use of its patented inventions ("Leader Innovation Surcharge").

3· One-tim e Histo rical Fee Payment to Leader

Lender is prepared lo ncccpt a $40 billion one-time payment as a compromise for the hlslorical damages, even though this is a frac tion oflhc value.

As a supporter of the effort to reform the U.S. hue laws, l support the following slalemenl by (oTIDer President Ronald Reagan:

"If you want more of something, subsidize it; if you want less of something, lax it."

APX 103

President Donald J. Trump Page3

Our current reliance on im;ome (both personal and cotporale) as a basis for la.'Cation has led to a stagnant economy w ith small growth and stagnant wage rates.

I believe President Donald Trump is correct in saying that lowering the corporate tax rate to 15% ant11owcring personal income tax rates will unle~1sh the U.S. economy and provide for growth of wages and Gross Domestic Product.

Unfortunately, the cut·rcnt prospects (or passage of Tax Reform are hampered by those in Congt·ess who are concerned that the lowering the tax rates on income will result in lowering of tax revenues and increases in the deficit and National Debt

Lowering tax t·ates increases tax revenues in the long-run; this is the essential concept of Reaganomics.

What 1 p ropose here iss win-win strategy and could become a key part in the effort to implement Tax Reform.

You can aothori2e these payments pursuan lto our Miller Ad Notiee. Leader would finally be nble to enjoy a return on its investment of "social networking.'' lt would allow Congress lo impose a Consumer Use Fee tagged lo sucialnelworl-.-ing ins lead of income.

As everyone in public pol icy knows, no one li kes additional taxes, and Congress will be ~.:ribcized for- imposing a new income la-x on ils own in lhe currenl Tax Reform dialogue. However, this proposal is factors better, I believe. It corrects the injustices visited upon inventor Leader Technologies while also allowing Congress to tap into a new source of revenue at the same lime.

Additionally, paying Leader what Leader· is due will make Leader as big as Apple. lt would enable Leader- lo become a major- job creator and per-haps the nwnber- one up and coming employer in Ohio.

This idea is a win-win-win propositioTL

I would like lo meet with you Lo diswss how you can assist us lo receive lhe Miller Acl Notice payments.

Sim:erely,

Yours s incerely,

/S/

Reference:

• Miller Acl Notice for FederaJ Works Projects 40 LTSC §31.31 ET SEQ filed l1y 'ier II re Cl of Leader Technologies, Inc. includ ing

1

pre-tax

after-taxSource: U.S. Census Bureau

1 Notices: Any errors and omissions are inadvertent. Claimant reserves the right to amend this Notice and the Claim(s). No claims are made to third party rights. All footnotes and endnotes are incorporated as if fully written herein. 2 Source: President Trump’s Opening Remarks, American Technology Roundtable, WH, Jun. 19, 2017 (“We have approximately $3.5 trillion dollars of market value in this room.”) See WH, Jun. 19, 2017 Attendees, Endnote [i].

APX 104

After-Tax

3 Claimant reserves the right to reassert up to the full value of Claimant’s property used without compensation.

APX 105

Fletcher v. Peck

Manual of Patent Law ASummary of the Law of Patents

Figure 1: Timeline of events related to this Leader Technologies, Inc. claim.

4 Professor James P. Chandler biography, http://www.nipli.org/1/1-3-2.html. 5 James P. Chandler, The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, Leader Technologies Director Services and Engagement Letters, Apr. 6, 2000, May 5, 2000, Mar. 01, 2001, May 25, 2001; Chandler signed a Leader Directors Services

APX 106

Agreement on May 5, 2000 in which he specifically committed to the Business Judgment Rule duties of diligence, loyalty, obedience, accountability, disinterestedness, due care, good faith, abuse of discretion, e.g., "prohibited from using their position of trust and confidence to further their private interests" and "may not engage in undisclosed personal transactions of a material nature.” Sec. 1(2), 1(2)(d). 6 U.S. Pat. No. 7,139,761, Dynamic Association of Electronically Stored Information with Iterative Workflow Changes, McKibben et al, awarded by Jon W Dudas, Director, USPTO, Nov. 21, 2006. 7 U.S. Pat. No. 7,925,246, Context Instantiated Application Protocol, McKibben et al, awarded by David J. Kappos, Director, USPTO, Jun. 5, 2012, 8 U.S. Pat. No. 8,195,714, Radio/Telephony Interoperability System, McKibben et al, signed by David J. Kappos, Director, USPTO, Apr. 12, 2001. 9 S. Hrg. 104-499 (Feb. 28, 1998). Economic Espionage Act Hearing, testimony of FBI Director Louis Freeh acknowledging James P. Chandler. U.S. Senate. 10 Chandler, J. P. (Mar. 28, 2001). Trade Secrets and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Conference. NIPLI (highlighted then Assistant Attorney General Eric H. Holder who was collaborating with Chandler on trade secrets and economic espionage cases, along with Robert S. Mueller, James B. Comey and Rod J. Rosenstein, among others). 11 United States v. James Hsu, 155 F.3d 189 (1998) (James P. Chandler, III, for the Justice Department, and Paul Mogin, Williams & Connolly LLP, concluded the first prosecution of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 ("EEA") drafted by Chandler for President Bill Clinton). 12 Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Nov. 16, 2012), Leader Technologies, Inc., v. Facebook, Inc., No. 12-617 (U.S. Supreme Court 2012) (Gibson Dunn LLP, White & Case LLP, Blank Rome LLP and Cooley Godward LLP represented Facebook and had personal relationships with Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. who hold substantial Facebook financial interests, as do all of the lower court judges in this case). 13 Graham, S. (May 23, 2014). Rader Steps Down as Chief, Apologies for Reines Email. The Recorder. 14 Former Patent Office Director David J. Kappos’s current law firm. 15 James P. Chandler, John D. Podesta. (Jun. 07, 1993). Third CPSR Cryptography and Privacy Conference. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (“to require [for the FBI] that telecommunications manufacturers and service providers redesign their systems to facilitate wiretapping.”). 16 Chandler bio, fn. 4. 17 Id. 18 Id.

APX 107

Figure 2: On Jun. 8, 2000, James P. Chandler, III, and his legal assistant Kelley E. Clements (L/R, right rear, seated), participated, along with co-inventors Jeffrey Lamb and Michael McKibben (L/R, left rear, standing), in Leader invention design sessions in Columbus, Ohio where he learned the essences of Leader’s social networking invention. Photo: Leader Technologies, Inc.Figure 1: On Jun. 8, 2000, James P. Chandler, III, and his legal assistant Kelley E. Clements (L/R, right rear, seated), participated, along with co-inventors Jeffrey Lamb and Michael McKibben (L/R, left rear, standing), in Leader invention design sessions in Columbus, Ohio where he learned the essences of Leader’s social networking invention. Photo: Leader Technologies, Inc.

19 Report of the Secretary (Mar. 14, 2001). Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Judicial Conference (Organizer of change to mutual fund reporting rules for federal judges and judicial employees: Jan Horbaly, Fed. Cir. Executive). 20 National Press Office. (Sep. 2, 2016). https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.clinton, Part 04 of 11, p. 56, ¶1. FBI.

APX 108

21 James P. Chandler. (Jun. 5, 2002). LLNL-CRADA. CRADA No. TC-2030-01. The Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) under its U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48 and Leader Technologies, LLC for RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE SECURITY SYSTEM, signed by Jeffrey Wadsworth for Director C. Burce Tartar. The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, PDF p. 36, Sec. 5, ¶5. 22 Executive Order 13130, Sec. 2(1); Executive Order 13231, Secs. 1(b), 10(c). 23 Version 2.0.1 (Aug. 29, 2002). Source code release including Leader Technologies' inventions marked with IBM copyrights. IBM Eclipse Foundation. 24 Kelley E. Clements. (Aug. 30, 2002). Chandler Executive Assistant Clements’ stenographer's minutes from meetings and events surrounding meeting among James P. Chandler and Montgomery County, Maryland development officers Dave Edgerley (Director), Janis Peters and May Webster (with the knowledge of Doug Duncan, County Executive) to negotiate use of $500-1,000,000 in federal budget support for a 40,000 sf. office space facility to be used by his organization NIPLI (National Intellectual Property Law Institute), the U.S. Patent Office archives, classified material (mentions CIA) and IBM, says no involvement of Congress and even used the phrase "(kind of a 'coup' of sorts)." 25 Eclipse.org Consortium. (Nov. 29, 2001). Eclipse.org Consortium Forms to Deliver New Era Application Development Tools [Press release]; See also The Eclipse Foundation (Sep. 17, 2008). The Members of Eclipse, Minutes of the Eclipse Board Meeting, Sep. 17, 2008; The Eclipse Foundation (Sep. 09, 2008). Membership Logos [Board minutes]; IBM. (2001). 2001 IBM annual report, Armonk NY, p. 21 (“We donated more than $40 million in application development tools to a new, independent, open-source software community called Eclipse.”). 26 Executive Order 13718. (Feb. 09, 2016). Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity, Sec. 3(a)(ii). Barack Obama (“(ii) ensuring that cybersecurity is a core element of the technologies associated with the Internet of Things and cloud computing, and that the policy and legal foundation for cybersecurity in the context of the Internet of Things is stable and adaptable.”).

APX 109

See

See

27 NIAC (Nov. 21, 2013). Business Meeting Agenda. Recommendations, p. 117. DHS.

APX 110

See

28 Leader v. Facebook, 1:08-cv-00862-JJF-LPS (D. Del. 2008), Tr. PgID Nos. 11423:21-11424:5.

APX 111

APX 112

APX 113

Fletcher v. Peck

Manual of Patent Law ASummary of the Law of Patents

29 Professor James P. Chandler biography, http://www.nipli.org/1/1-3-2.html.

APX 114

Figure 1: Timeline of events related to this Leader Technologies, Inc. claim.

30 James P. Chandler, The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, Leader Technologies Director Services and Engagement Letters, Apr. 6, 2000, May 5, 2000, Mar. 01, 2001, May 25, 2001; Chandler signed a Leader Directors Services Agreement on May 5, 2000 in which he specifically committed to the Business Judgment Rule duties of diligence, loyalty, obedience, accountability, disinterestedness, due care, good faith, abuse of discretion, e.g., "prohibited from using their position of trust and confidence to further their private interests" and "may not engage in undisclosed personal transactions of a material nature.” Sec. 1(2), 1(2)(d). 31 U.S. Pat. No. 7,139,761, Dynamic Association of Electronically Stored Information with Iterative Workflow Changes, McKibben et al, awarded by Jon W Dudas, Director, USPTO, Nov. 21, 2006. 32 U.S. Pat. No. 7,925,246, Context Instantiated Application Protocol, McKibben et al, awarded by David J. Kappos, Director, USPTO, Jun. 5, 2012, 33 U.S. Pat. No. 8,195,714, Radio/Telephony Interoperability System, McKibben et al, signed by David J. Kappos, Director, USPTO, Apr. 12, 2001.

APX 115

34 S. Hrg. 104-499 (Feb. 28, 1998). Economic Espionage Act Hearing, testimony of FBI Director Louis Freeh acknowledging James P. Chandler. U.S. Senate. 35 Chandler, J. P. (Mar. 28, 2001). Trade Secrets and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Conference. NIPLI (highlighted then Assistant Attorney General Eric H. Holder who was collaborating with Chandler on trade secrets and economic espionage cases, along with Robert S. Mueller, James B. Comey and Rod J. Rosenstein, among others). 36 United States v. James Hsu, 155 F.3d 189 (1998) (James P. Chandler, III, for the Justice Department, and Paul Mogin, Williams & Connolly LLP, concluded the first prosecution of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 ("EEA") drafted by Chandler for President Bill Clinton). 37 Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Nov. 16, 2012), Leader Technologies, Inc., v. Facebook, Inc., No. 12-617 (U.S. Supreme Court 2012) (Gibson Dunn LLP, White & Case LLP, Blank Rome LLP and Cooley Godward LLP represented Facebook and had personal relationships with Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. who hold substantial Facebook financial interests, as do all of the lower court judges in this case). 38 Graham, S. (May 23, 2014). Rader Steps Down as Chief, Apologies for Reines Email. The Recorder. 39 Former Patent Office Director David J. Kappos’s current law firm. 40 James P. Chandler, John D. Podesta. (Jun. 07, 1993). Third CPSR Cryptography and Privacy Conference. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (“to require [for the FBI] that telecommunications manufacturers and service providers redesign their systems to facilitate wiretapping.”). 41 Chandler bio, fn. 4. 42 Id. 43 Id. 44 Report of the Secretary (Mar. 14, 2001). Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Judicial Conference (Organizer of change to mutual fund reporting rules for federal judges and judicial employees: Jan Horbaly, Fed. Cir. Executive). 45 National Press Office. (Sep. 2, 2016). https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.clinton, Part 04 of 11, p. 56, ¶1. FBI.

APX 116

Figure 2: On Jun. 8, 2000, James P. Chandler, III, and his legal assistant Kelley E. Clements (L/R, right rear, seated), participated, along with co-inventors Jeffrey Lamb and Michael McKibben (L/R, left rear, standing), in Leader invention design sessions in Columbus, Ohio where he learned the essences of Leader’s social networking invention. Photo: Leader Technologies, Inc.

46 James P. Chandler. (Jun. 5, 2002). LLNL-CRADA. CRADA No. TC-2030-01. The Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) under its U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48 and Leader Technologies, LLC for RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE SECURITY SYSTEM, signed by Jeffrey Wadsworth for Director C. Burce Tartar. The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, PDF p. 36, Sec. 5, ¶5. 47 Executive Order 13130, Sec. 2(1); Executive Order 13231, Secs. 1(b), 10(c). 48 Version 2.0.1 (Aug. 29, 2002). Source code release including Leader Technologies' inventions marked with IBM copyrights. IBM Eclipse Foundation. 49 Kelley E. Clements. (Aug. 30, 2002). Chandler Executive Assistant Clements’ stenographer's minutes from meetings and events surrounding meeting among James P. Chandler and Montgomery County, Maryland development officers Dave Edgerley (Director), Janis Peters and May Webster (with the knowledge of Doug Duncan, County Executive) to negotiate use of $500-1,000,000 in federal budget support for a 40,000 sf. office space facility to be used by his organization NIPLI (National Intellectual Property Law Institute), the U.S. Patent Office archives, classified material (mentions CIA) and IBM, says no involvement of Congress and even used the phrase "(kind of a 'coup' of sorts)."

APX 117

See

50 Eclipse.org Consortium. (Nov. 29, 2001). Eclipse.org Consortium Forms to Deliver New Era Application Development Tools [Press release]; See also The Eclipse Foundation (Sep. 17, 2008). The Members of Eclipse, Minutes of the Eclipse Board Meeting, Sep. 17, 2008; The Eclipse Foundation (Sep. 09, 2008). Membership Logos [Board minutes]; IBM. (2001). 2001 IBM annual report, Armonk NY, p. 21 (“We donated more than $40 million in application development tools to a new, independent, open-source software community called Eclipse.”). 51 Executive Order 13718. (Feb. 09, 2016). Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity, Sec. 3(a)(ii). Barack Obama (“(ii) ensuring that cybersecurity is a core element of the technologies associated with the Internet of Things and cloud computing, and that the policy and legal foundation for cybersecurity in the context of the Internet of Things is stable and adaptable.”). 52 NIAC (Nov. 21, 2013). Business Meeting Agenda. Recommendations, p. 117. DHS.

APX 118

See

See

APX 119

APX 120

53 Ref. Timeline, http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/cyber-hijack-findings.html.

APX 121

APX 122

APX 123

APX 124

APX 125

1993

19

94

Jun

7, 1

993

Jun

199

7 Le

ade

r Te

ch

nolo

gie

s fo

un

ded

1995

19

96

-D

ec 1

999

1 I F

eb2

00

0

Lead

er fi

rst d

isdo

sed

I

Nov

21

,20

06

Le

ader

a1w

rdec

U.

S. P

at N

o 7,

139,

761

2006

20

07

2000

Ap

r 12,

201

1 Le

ader

a·w

arde

d U

.S. P

at N

a

7,92

5,24

6 I 20

09

2010

20

11

Jun

5, 2

01

2

Lead

er a

war

ded

u.s. P

at N

o.

8,19

5,7

14

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

Jam

es R

Cha

ndle

r, Il

l I

John

D. P

odes

ta

spor

lSO

red

Jul1

4,

1999

Bi

ll C

linto

n is

sued

Ex

ecut

ive

Ord

er

1313

0 fo

rmin

g th

e N

atio

nal

Infra

stru

ctu

re

Feb

2-5

, 2

00

4 •

•••-

-•--

-•-•

••••

••••

•---

---·

--·•

---.

-·+

'Thi

rd C

PSR

Cry

pto

grap

hy a

nd

Priv

acy

Con

fere

nce"

to

gl..

e FB

I uni

vers

al

back

door

enc

rypt

ion

"for

wire

tapp

ing

" 9/

11,2

001

Sep

29,

199

9 C

IA fo

mne

d ln

·Q T

el

priv

ate

vent

ure

capi

tal c

ompa

ny

Oct 4

, 200

1 P

roje

ct S

lella

r \N

ind

wam

mtle

ss S

llr..e

illanc

e au

thor

ized

Oct 1

9, 2

001

Geo

rge

Bush

issu

ed E

xecu

tive

Ord

er 1

3231

exp

andi

ng N

IAC

Oct

26,

200

1 Th

e P

atri

ot

Act

Oct

31,

200

1

Eclip

seC

ON

04

"Pu

blic

-priv

ate"

Exe

cutiv

e O

rder

exp

loita

tion

of L

eade

r's in

vent

ion

bega

n

·----

----

----

----

----

----

----

-· •

tJu

n 5

, 200

2 1

I :Cha

ndle

r to

ok c

usto

dy o

f L

eade

r sol

lrce

co

de

for

a i

IIO

OE

, llN

L.

Uni

v. o

f C

A p

roje

ct t

hat

he fa

cili

tate

d

1

~-------------

----

-~--

--------

Aug

28,

2002

C

hand

ler

priv

atel

y de

scnb

ed h

is w

orl<

With

IB

M O

A, P

aren

t Offi

ce, E

clip

se F

oun

datio

n . l

lNL

as

a "

cou

p

Aug

29,

200

2 IB

M E

clip

se F

ound

ilti

on R

elea

se v.

2.

0.1

cont

aine

d l

ead

e(5

$0

cial

ne

twor

king

inv

enti

ons

mar

ked

with

IB

M c

opyr

ight

s

"A P

ate

nt i

s a

Con

tra

ct"

Onc

e a

wa

rde

d b

y tb

e go

vern

men~. i

t ca

nn

ot b

e re

scin

ded

or g

uash

ed u

nder

the

colo

r of l

aw.

-U.S

. C

on

stitu

tion,

.Jom

es M

ad

iso

n 1

Fe

de

ralis

t No.

44,

Chi

ef J~s

tice

Joh

n

Mor

sha/

1 1 U

SP

TO D

ire

cto

r Will

iam

S

imo

nd

s, C

omm

on S

ense

, F

airn

ess,

etc

.

NSA

arc

hite

ct W

illia

m B

inne

y re

signe

d .,

Nov

29, 20

01

IBM

form

ed T

he E

dips

e Fo

unda

tion

With

S40

mill

ion

"don

atio

n"

Fig

ure

1:

Tim

elin

e o

f e

ven

ts r

ela

ted

to th

is l

ead

er

Tech

no

logi

es,

Inc.

cla

im.

PA

RTY

PR

OV

IDIN

G T

HE

WO

RK

: Le

ad

er T

ech

no

logi

es,

Inc./

Mic

hae

l T. M

cK

ibb

en

v.

PU

BLI

C A

UT

HO

RIT

Y: T

he U

nite

d St

ates

Ex.e

cuti

ve

Do

na

ld J

. Tru

mp

an

d h

is p

red

ece

sso

rs W

illia

m J

. Clin

ton

, Ge

org

e W

. B

ush

an

d B

ara

ck H

. O

ba

ma

. M

ILLE

R A

CT

N

OT

ICE

FO

R F

ED

ER

AL

WO

RKS

PR

OJE

CTS

40

US

C §

31

31

ET

SEQ

., Ju

ly 2

2,

20

17

.

APX 126




EXHIBIT 63

�� !"# �$�%&'()*'+,�"&-./�(0)*�1+�"2-&(*03�,20,�1+43�5,2&''�1&�61-&7�16�,2'8+),'*��,0,'(9�:;�)+,'44)<'+='�0<'+=)'(�20*�=1+=4-*'*�,20,�>-(()0�)+,'&6'&'*�)+�,2'/&'()*'+,)04�'4'=,)1+�$�0�(,0,'.'+,�,20,�?2)4'�,'=2+)=0443�0==-&0,'@�)(�.)(4'0*)+<�0+*(-<<'(,(�?)*'(/&'0*�*)(('+,�0.1+<��.'&)=0+�)+,'44)<'+='�0<'+=)'(�?2'+�+1+'�20('.'&<'*A"2'�5,2&''�1&�61-&7�0<'+=)'(�&'6'&&'*�,1�B3�C&A�"&-./�0&'�,2'�D'+,&04��+,'44)<'+='�<'+=3@�,2'� 0,)1+04��'=-&),3��<'+=3@�,2'�EAFA�A�0+*�,2'�#6G='�16�,2'�H)&'=,1&�16� 0,)1+04�+,'44)<'+='@�044�16�?2)=2�*','&.)+'*�,20,�>-(()0�)+,'&6'&'*�)+�,2'�'4'=,)1+A�"2')&�?1&I?0(�=1./)4'*�)+,1�0�&'/1&,@�0+*�0�*'=40(()G'*�J'&()1+�?0(�&'4'0('*�1+�K0+A�L�B3�,2'*)&'=,1&�16�+0,)1+04�)+,'44)<'+='A��,�(0)*�,20,�044�61-&�0<'+=)'(�20*�52)<2�=1+G*'+='7�,20,>-(()0+�(/)'(�20*�,&)'*�,1�)+,'&6'&'�)+�,2'�'4'=,)1+�1+�,2'�1&*'&(�16�%&'()*'+,�M40*).)&�MA%-,)+A"2'�&'0(1+�,2'�J)'?(�16�1+43�,21('�61-&�)+,'44)<'+='�0<'+=)'(@�+1,�044�:;@�?'&'�)+=4-*'*�)+,2'�0(('((.'+,�)(�()./4'N�"2'3�?'&'�,2'�1+'(�,&0=I)+<�0+*�0+043O)+<�,2'�>-(()0+=0./0)<+A�"2'�&'(,�?'&'�*1)+<�1,2'&�?1&IA"2'�)+,'44)<'+='�=1..-+),3�)(�0�(/&0?4)+<�'+,'&/&)('�,20,�)+=4-*'(�.)4),0&3�16G='&(�?21,&0=I�'+'.3�,&11/�.1J'.'+,(@�0==1-+,0+,(�?21�0+043O'�,2'�G+0+='(�16��(40.)(,.)4),0+,(�0+*�'+<)+''&(�?21�*'()<+�(/3�(0,'44),'(A�"2'&'�0&'�(14*)'&(@�(0)41&(�0+*C0&)+'(P�,'+(�16�,21-(0+*(�16�=)J)4)0+�<1J'&+.'+,�'./413''(�0+*�,'+(�16�,21-(0+*(�16/&)J0,'�=1+,&0=,1&(A�(I'*�0B1-,�>-(()09(�'4'=,)1+�.'**4)+<�*-&)+<�0�+'?(�=1+6'&'+='�1+�"2-&(*03�)+%140+*@�C&A�"&-./�&'/'0,'*�2)(�60.)4)0&�&'6&0)+�,20,�5),�=1-4*7�20J'�B''+�>-(()0�1&�1,2'&=1-+,&)'(�,20,�)+,'&6'&'*�)+�,2'�'4'=,)1+@�0+*�,2'+�0//'0&'*�,1�(-<<'(,�,20,�,2'&'�?0(20&*43�0+�)+,'44)<'+='�=1..-+),3�=1+('+(-(�1+�,2'�.0,,'&A

QRSTU�VWXYZ[\X�]�_SXXW[�VZ\\YWabcd�ef�ghZYYWZiZ�jZiWZX�k]lhmZZ\�h]�jRZZ

�� !��!�"��#��#��$��!��%��#��#��&��'��(�� )��!��)�� (��(��(��*��&��'��(��(��+��'��,��-��'��(��%�� #��.��/��(��#��#�� 0�� 1��%��2345�65789:;<=;�>?5;@A57B�� (��((�� #�� CDE�FGHGIG��J��%�� !��#��(�� (�� #�� %��KDE�LGMGIG��N��O��+��#��(��)��(��(��)�� (��(��#�� (�� ,��P��#�� KDE�QGRGHG�� (�� (� ��(��S'��+�� .��T� ��'��%��UKDE�VWWXYE�ZW�CDE�[X\EYCZ\�ZW�L]CXZ]_�HCE__XEYE�� +�(�� (�� '��#��

�� !��"�#��$�%"��&��'�(%#��$(��$��"��&��%��')�*(�+,-./,�01�234.5567.38.�/39�:.;./-8<�%$�$(��=$%$��>�?%�$��$@��'$%�&�@�(��?'��&%��?��%$'��'$%��$(��)*(��>�?%�$��$��A��" B'�C1168.�01�234.5567.38.�/39�D0,34.-634.5567.38.�(��?'�?��$�&$'��'�$�#��%��%$��'�%��&��%��%&��$��')��$�$(��>�?%�$��$��E��%��=�&��$ @$(��C1168.�01�234.5567.38.�/39�F3/5G;6;��!'��$��$(��%$'�$��$(��H��$��=$%$�')*(��C1168.�01�I/4603/5�J.8,-64G�234.5567.38.�%$�$(��>)A)�)��"'�$�"�$(��$��"��&��%��$(��"�#��$�$��(��?�'$�?��"�'��""��")�*(��*��%'�� >�?%�$��$(%'�$(��C1168.�01�234.5567.38.�/39�F3/5G;6;�$��(��?�&�$�$(��K�� $��$��'$"��?'@��"��'�%��$(��&��%�'��(��?��%$��$��%$��%�� )*(��@��&��'�@�$(��'�$(��L��$%"��)�M$'��%��$��"��&��%��'�$(��N.1.3;.234.5567.38.�F7.38G@��(�&(��'�$(��$(��O�%�"�'$��$��"��&��%"��& )�P<.�F-QGR�I/SGR�F6-T0-8.R�U/-63.;�%��D0/;4�V,/-9�%�'��%��(%#��$(��$��"��&��%�&(�'WXY��Z��[\��]��*(��I/4603/5�V.0;/46/5_234.5567.38.�F7.38G��&��'��(%$��$(�$(��%"�'�&%?$�� &%��'? �'%$��$�')��$(��I/4603/5�:.8033/6;;/38.�C1168.��'�"�'@��'�%��?��%$�'�$(��'%$��$�')*(��!�&%��$��&! )�M��aaa@�%�?��&�''��$��$(��b%$��%��c��'?%$�%�OM�$��"��&��"��& ��&��&$� ��%�!��$(��d(��'��%'' ��%?'��e��"�%��@�=��%@��(�&(�%'��%�#��$��$� �� &%��%�?�%��'@�!��"�$(��%��"�fg)��fgh@�$(��%"��& ��&��&$� ��'?�%&��%�� "($��'@��%��"�$��$(��"��"��$(��c�%��%�@�%��%#%��'��?��)ijk�lmnokopq�rst�urqvoswkms�sjxq�yltrkjq�zor�{rpj|mm}~��xokkj��rst�os�kvj��m�sosw��oj�sw�sjxqnjkkj��




EXHIBIT 64

Secretary Nielsen Statement onPresident Trump’s ElectionSecurity Executive Order

Release Date: Release Date: September 13, 2018

Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen released the following

statement today on President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order, Imposing Certain

Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election:

“Today’s Executive Order demonstrates the Administration’s continued

commitment to securing our nation’s election infrastructure. As I have said on

numerous occasions, election security is national security and any attempt to

interfere in our democratic institutions is unacceptable. By mandating the

imposition of sanctions against any individual or entity that seeks to interfere in our

elections, we are sending a clear signal that the U.S. government will not tolerate

interference of any kind and will use every tool at our disposal to protect our

democratic process.

“We do not need to wait for another interference attempt to know the threat is real

and evolving. DHS is already working closely with state and local election officials to

ensure all Americans have confidence in our elections. Election officials in all 50

states and over 1,000 local jurisdictions are now working with DHS in some capacity

to secure their election systems. We’re focusing on providing actionable

information and intelligence to election officials; providing technical assistance to

secure systems; and supporting election-focused incident response planning, training, and exercises.

“Securing our elections requires support across the government and our communities, and DHS will

continue to lead the federal effort to ensure every American’s vote is counted and counted correctly.”

###

Topics: Election Security, Secretary of Homeland Security


Last Published Date: September 13, 2018


> News > Press Releases > Secretary Nielsen Statement on President Trump’s Election Security Executive Order



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov
































































EXHIBIT 65

DHS, FBI Hold Joint Briefing forElection Officials withFacebook and Microsoft

Release Date: Release Date: August 24, 2018

DHS, FBI, Facebook, and Microsoft Update State and Local Election Officials on

Recent Actions Taken to Counter Foreign Threats

Washington, D.C. – Today, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was joined

by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Facebook, and Microsoft to host a

briefing for the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and the National

Association of State Election Directors (NASED) on recent actions taken by both

companies to combat foreign threats. This is the second call in recent weeks DHS

has hosted with Facebook and the nation’s lead election security officials to share

information on actions being taken to combat malicious interference operations.

The call provided a unique opportunity to connect private and public officials to

share information and actions being taken to combat threats to our elections and to

our democracy.

“DHS works with a broad range of partners to understand and stop malicious cyber

actors, whether they are attempting to interfere with elections, infiltrate critical

infrastructure, or simply collect intelligence from policy makers, these actions

reinforce the need for government and industry to work together to secure the

homeland and protect our democracy,” said Christopher C. Krebs, Under Secretary

for the DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate. “Facebook’s and Microsoft’s announcements

continue to underscore the important role the private sector has in combating this threat. Like cybersecurity,

countering foreign influence is a shared responsibility, and these calls are an important indicator of the level

of cooperation between our public and private partners to share information and take action.”

“Strong relationships with the private sector are a pillar of the FBI’s operational strategy to combat foreign

influence operations,” said Michael McGarrity, Acting Executive Assistant Director of the FBI’s National

Security Branch. “Companies have a key role in taking action to secure their networks and platforms.

Working together with our partners, the FBI shares actionable intelligence to better enable these companies

to address any abuse of their systems by foreign actors. We look forward to continuing this two-way

communication between government and the private sector, which is vital in protecting our democratic

institutions and values."

“Effectively combating coordinated information operations requires many parts of society working together,

which is why Facebook believes so strongly in the need for collaboration between law enforcement,

government agencies, security experts and other companies to confront these growing threats. We are

grateful for the opportunity to brief state election officials on a recent call convened by DHS and again today

as part of our continued effort to develop collaborative relationships between government and private

industry,” said Kevin Martin, Facebook VP of Public Policy.

“No one organization, department or individual can solve this issue alone, that’s why information sharing is

so important. To really be successful in defending democracy, technology companies, government, civil

society, the academic community and researchers need to come together and partner in new and

meaningful ways,” said Tom Burt, Microsoft CVP Customer Security and Trust

“With the 2018 midterms just around the corner everyone in the election and cybersecurity community must

remain vigilant. I commend the efforts made by DHS and FBI to foster communication through today’s call

with Facebook and Microsoft. It is clear that Secretaries of State, state election officials, federal agencies and

private sector partners are working diligently together to defend against foreign threats in order to protect

our democracy,” said Jim Condos, President of the National Association of Secretaries of State and Vermont

Secretary of State.

“We appreciate the work done by DHS and FBI to make sure that we in the election community have a full

picture of the efforts to interfere in our democracy. Cybersecurity preparedness and resilience is a group

effort, requiring collaboration across all levels of government and the private sector. NASED values the

opportunity to hear from companies like Facebook and Microsoft about the steps they’ve taken to curtail

malfeasance on their platforms. We are encouraged by their partnership, and that of our other private sector

partners, as we approach the November general election,” said Keith Ingram, Director of Elections from

Texas and President Elect, National Association of State Election Directors.

# # #

Topics: Cybersecurity, Election Security

Keywords: Cybersecurity, Election security

Last Published Date: August 25, 2018


> News > Press Releases > DHS, FBI Hold Joint Briefing for Election Officials with Facebook and Microsoft



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

































































EXHIBIT 66

ODNI, DHS, FBI To LeadNational-level ClassifiedDialogue for State ElectionOfficials

Release Date: Release Date: February 15, 2018

Cross-posted from DNI.gov

On February 16 and February 18, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence

(ODNI), together with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal

Bureau of Investigation (FBI), will sponsor a classified briefing for election officials

from all 50 states. This national-level classified dialogue with officials from the

National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), the National Association of

State Election Directors (NASED), and the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is

part of an ongoing effort to ensure the integrity and security of the nation's election

infrastructure, particularly as the risk environment evolves. The briefings will focus

on increasing awareness of foreign adversary intent and capabilities against the

states’ election infrastructure, as well as a discussion of threat mitigation efforts.

The goal of this collaborative event is to build an enduring partnership to ensure the

sharing of timely, substantive information on threats to our nation’s critical

infrastructure.

# # #

Topics: Election Security


Last Published Date: March 27, 2018


> News > Press Releases > ODNI, DHS, FBI To Lead National-level Classified Dialogue for State Election Officials



NewsNews

Blog

Data

Events

Fact Sheets


In Focus

Media Contacts

Multimedia


Podcasts

Press Releases


Social Hub

Social Media

Speeches

Testimony

News Archive




White House USA.gov

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/1847-odni-dhs-fbi-to-lead-national-level-classified-dialogue-for-state-election-officials































































-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH

•'


EXHIBIT 67

.r

WND EXCLUSIVE

2 MEMBERS OF SUPREME COURT 'TARGETED BY U.S. SPIES' Shock claim: Intel agencies 'harvested' personal data

Published: 04/30/2015 at 10:37 AM

... ....................... ® .. .......................... .

U.S. intelligence agencies have "harvested" the personal and private data of "hundriJds of federal

officials and judges, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg," charges

a legal brief filed by Larry Klayman, the attorney who has come to be known as "the#l~yer'' for

his successful legal battles against the National Security Agency.

Klayman, founder of FreedomWatch,

(bt.tP-:IIwww.freedomwatchusa.org) successfully sued ~nal

~..AgencY. in 2013 (lZP-=591667) over the collection of telephone

metadata from Verizon customers that was detailed i~ments released by intelligence-document leaker Edward Snowden. In

December 2013, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruiWettff&'f@~ 0

program likely is unconstitutional and ordered the government to stop collecting data on the two plaintiffs. He stayed his injunction pending

appeal, however, "in light of the significant national security interests at

stake in this case and the novelty of the constitutional issues."

Wednesday, Klayman filed a reply in support of motion to lift that stay,

arguing that in the 16 months since it was imposed, "the federal

government has continued its unconstitutional practices and violated

the rights of hundreds of millions of Americans."

He continued: "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit ('D.C. Circuit') has not acted fast enough to protect the rights of

all these Americans and unconstitutional actions by the U.S.

Government are still continuing without redress. Plaintiffs in this case

sought and received a preliminary injunction, which by design is

intended to put an immediate stop to any unconstitutional activity.

However, this injunction proves ineffective as long as this injunction is

stayed pending appeal. The longer the D.C. Circuit delays in issuing its

opinion, the longer Plaintiffs' and all Americans' constitutional rights are

being violated."

What real/y_goes on with the federal government? Read Andrew

NaP-olitano's warning that "It is Dangerous to be Right when the

Government is Wrong;:_(httP..:IIsuP..erstore. wnd.comlbooks/Current-

Affairs/lt-ls-Dangerous-to-Be-Right-When-the-Govemment-ls-Wrong-The-case-for-Personal-

Freedom-Hardcover?nromocode=sto(y}.

As he did a month agQ..(£1p=1827685), Klayman asked the court to question a witness in secret.

The witness, Dennis Montgomery, can testify "about the unconstitutional and illegal surveillance

conducted by the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency that is highly

relevant and of crucial important ... as he worked closely with these agencies following the tragedy of

Sept. 11, 2001," said Klayman.

Montgomery's poor health adds to the urgency that his testimony be taken now, Klayman has said

In Wednesday's filing, Klayman revealed Montgomery would provide evidence intelligence agencies

have even spied on and collected private and personal information on Supreme Court Justices John

Roberts and Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

It's not the first time Klayman has hinted at spying on members of the Supreme Court, but this is the

first time he has disclosed his witness as the source.

WND reported KlaY.man,.J1ptwmng on the Aaron Klein radio show on May__11l, 2014 (£1p=865961),

suggested Roberts may have been blackmailed to approve Obamacare after being spied on by the

NSAand CIA.

Find Out More > 1.97,049

"Let's take this possibility: Why did Chief Justice Roberts at the eleventh hour change his decision?

He was going to side with the other justices and find that Obamacare was unconstitutional. Is it

something that was dug up on him by the NSA or the CIA? Was that used against him to blackmail

him?" Klayman asked.

"These are the kinds of things [the government is doing], and that's why it's so scary what's going on

with the NSA and the CIA. It can happen in a democracy. So that may help explain it, and perhaps

we can reach these issues through the NSA cases that we brought, the NSA/CIA cases. I intend to

get the truth on this."

But Judge Leon's 2013 stay is preventing Klayman from getting to the truth, and he's asking the court

to remove that obstacle now.

"It is therefore crucial for this Court to lift the stay so that the parties can begin discovery and

determine the full extent of Defendants' constitutional violations, as well as to put a stop to this

'almost Orwellian' tyranny, he said in Wednesday's filing.

"This Court, which is also courageous and which has protected the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs

and all Americans, must respectfully also take a strong stand, particularly given the huge delay,

caused in large part by the obstructionist tactics of the Obama Justice Department, which has

prevented the D.C. Circuit from timely reaching the merits of the administration's appeal of this

Court's preliminary injunction order of December 16, 2013. If the judicial system does not stand in

the breach to protect the rights of Americans, then the citizenry is left defenseless and revolution, as

occurred in 1776, is at hand. Plaintiffs do not advocate this, but revolution is inevitable if our judges

do not timely enforce the Constitution. By lifting the stay now, the Obama Justice Department will

have to move for a stay before the D.C. Circuit. If nothing else, at least this will cause the D.C. Circuit

to now reach the merits of Your Honor's preliminary injunction."

{!:J!!I2s://www.wnd.com/:<

TRENDING TODAY Ads by Revcontent

Popcorn Does This to Your Brain (Proof)_(//trends.revcontent.com/click.RIJP-2 d=NJ~p\IGDiaE1jEouY5hwDRWKasuaxmdQYb2hP-ifw%28LgDOzbUf9529FI9aVgRf~9ZMtnX5e2 Vitality Now -

Diabetic? You Need to See This About Metformin _(1/trends.reycontent.com/click.~ d=JOr3AugJtlrN1Tty.QQMQ.rnXZEh2gNihdJuX26dMamWHvLafm%2Bs2100j7vvjcUx70nT8euvQPtX%2F4y.Mg!J.: Vibrant Health Network

l!J,mreme-1'11 Bet Someone You Love Just Got "4-Digit" Scammed (Watch the Scam in Action)

.(//trends.revcontent.com/click.RIJP-2 l<Qlill= d=7Pa%2FsBzaeSsUdLOLMokZ7YfotYKc14z3AvcKe YkfU2Sxsvxna 1 cTFCzf2rxcF3M42Y.a6ZAKJlli!!20ThGB%2 Rich Dad Poor Dad Letter

Top Cardiologist: This One Thing Will Properly Flush out Your Bowels (//trends.revcontent.com/click.f2hP-? . co r ·d-mOPWMOzt%2FwG56oaP-%2FUd4vP-XDbkev6ziFMzZNEYAzhvUaOtHXtZcCuw21MCe~A'WiNrttPic: Gundry MD

Oncologists Are Breaking Down After True Cause of Cancer is Released .(1/trends.revcontent.com/click.P-hP.l . d=4kakEizNM7ceKziVehY.ovJmH3RaaMj7%2Fr4P-11 FVSOcZQZL2DcdORGiNdgDz37zeH~I4aRihsGGNOI Natural Health Solutions

Popular In the Community

'HATE' SPEECH BAN UNTAXED: FOREIGN-

LEAVES 'FREE SOCIET ... BORN WORKERS SEND ...

Joseph Norris BlindersOff

1d 37m

More the your rights Laughable. So illegals end where my feeling ... are bad, but not as b ...

0>

(https://dynamic

cdn.spot.im/yad/optout.html)

'DRAG 101' FOR TEENS

TO BE TAUGHT AT ...

... 44nhj45HF

1h

Any parent allowing his/her child to attend .. .

Note: Read our discussion guidelines (/discussion:Quidelines/). before commenting.

~ -Iii""'

justiceS/f2rintJ) LJ

CITY GETS SUED FOR

ATTACKS BY ITS 'MURA ...

\0 bones534

55m

A viral pandemic of the left has descended o ...

Would the FBI Grant a "Con Man" Immunity? ------------------------------------------------------Pf. thepostemail.com/2015/09/07 /would-the-fbi-grant -a-con-man-immunity/

Sharon Rondeau

"A MASSIVE BREACH OF INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY"

by Sharon Rondeau

I Select unguaoe . ., 1

An intel-driven national security and law enforcement a,gency providing leadership and making a difference for more than a century. Our mission is to help protect yout your ehildren, your communities. and :our businesses from the most dangerous threats facing our nation- from international and domestic terrorists to spies on U.S. soil ... from C)·bex ";Uains to corrupt government officials ... from mobsters to violent street gangs. ... from child preda ors: to serial killers. Along the ,·ay, ,,-e help de end and uphold our nation's economy, pbysieal and electronic infrastructure, and democracy. Learn more about hO\"'" ve ha,·e E!\'Oh·ed into a more proacth-e threat-driven security ageney in recent ye.ars.

From fbi.gov/about us

September 7,

2015

(Sep. 7, 2015)- Last February, former CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery filed a civil suit

against james Risen, author of Pay Any Price: Greed, Power, and Endless War; his publisher,

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; and HMH Holdings. Inc .. the parent company of HMH.

Risen is a national security columnist for The New York Times, having most recently written

about an opinion issued by a three-judge appeals court panel regarding whether or not

mass collection of Americans' phone records by the National Security Agency (NSA) could

continue. The panel's decision remanded a case brought by Atty. Larry Klayman challenging

the surveillance back to U.S. District Court judge Richard C. Leon, who had ruled in

December 2013 that the practice was "likely unconstitutional."

Klayman represents Montgomery in his case against Risen, et al. The action is assigned to

judge jose E. Martinez, with Magistrate judge jonathan Goodman having presided over

hearings dating back to at least May 28.

1/6

Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, Montgomery worked as a contractor with the

CIA and NSA and later as a partner in eTreppid Technologies to develop various types of computer software.

Montgomery's software was reportedly used by several government entities to assist in

detecting and preventing future terrorist attacks.

In a December 2009 Playboy article by Aram Roston, Montgomery is described as "The Man

Who Conned the Pentagon," a story which was duplicated by NPR, an Australian news

source, attrition.org, and numerous other websites.

Playboy's story was described as "remarkable" by Wired.com shortly after it was published.

In 2006, Montgomery's home was raided by FBI agents which a federal magistrate judge and

U.S. District Court judge ruled was a violation of Montgomery's constitutional rights by the

way in which the warrant was obtained.

In a press release following a quickly-scheduled hearing in response to the appeals court's

decision on the NSA's data collection activities, Klayman predicted that the agency's mass surveillance will soon come to an end. Leon indicated that with the appellate court's

approval, he will take the case to trial, reportedly providing guidance to Klayman on how to

solidify his "standing" to sue.

Klayman additionally represented Montgomery in several attempts to intervene in a civil suit

filed in late 2007 by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) against Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff loseph M. Arpaio and several of his employees for allegedly racially-profiling Latinos

during traffic stops and immigration sweeps.

Montgomery's requests were denied by U.S. District Court judge G. Murray Snow and the

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In early May, Snow demanded the collection of

Montgomery's work product and emails exchanged between Montgomery and several

individuals directed to work with him as a confidential informant for Arpaio.

Snow also granted a request from the U.S. Department of justice to intervene in the case

and take custody of approximately 50 hard drives produced by Montgomery for Arpaio.

Klayman has petitioned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to order Snow off the case for

conflict of interest. In a column written at WND in May, Klayman wrote that Snow was a "top

candidate for impeachment" for his alleged attempt "to destroy a fine law enforcement

official like Sheriff Arpaio and a courageous whistleblower like Dennis Montgomery" as well

as his refusal to recuse himself from the Me lend res case.

2/6

In his latest book, Risen characterized Montgomery as having carried out a hoax on the U.S.

government. According to a report from U.S. News & World Report, Risen included

Montgomery's dispute of Risen's claims in the book.

Montgomery alleges that Risen damaged his reputation and placed him in danger of

retribution from Islamic terrorists "who have sworn to attack those assisting the U.S. military and Government."

The most recent action in Montgomery's lawsuit against Risen occurred on September 3.

On August 31, Risen's attorneys filed a motion to extend a September 16 deadline for the

"discovery-completion date" to November 30, to which Klayman objected on his client's behalf.

The defendants' attorneys also demanded that Montgomery turn over more documentation

to them as part of their quest to vindicate their clients.

In a transcript of a "discovery" hearing in the case dated August 21, 2015, Klayman

confirmed that Montgomery was deposed for seven hours the previous day. Contrary to

the defendants' claims in their motion, Klayman told the court that Montgomery had provided all necessary discovery other than "likely classified" software.

"For the last year, Mr. Montgomery has, for more than a year, has been coming forward as a

whistleblower to the NSA, the CIA, the Department of Defense, the FBI, and the Department

of justice and other agencies, including Congress in trying to provide information to the FBI

so they could look at it. Because one of the things that he has that is not part of this lawsuit,

is what appears to be unconstitutional surveillance on hundreds of millions of American

citizens, including federal judges. So that has been turned over to the FBI," Klayman

declared.

The attorney additionally cited "sensitivity" surrounding the proposed provision of classified

materials "to a private source."

During testimony on April 23 and 24 in Snow's courtroom in Arizona, Arpaio and his chief

deputy, Gerard Sheridan, respectively confirmed that Montgomery was performing work

which had revealed that Snow's communications and those of other federal judges had been breached by an unnamed government entity along with tens of thousands of bank

accounts belonging to Maricopa County residents.

When Goodman asked Klayman when Montgomery, who has been in poor health, provided

his software to the FBI, Klayman responded, "He provided it to them three days ago. It has

been in the process to provide that to them and he provided them a lot of other

information too, which they are looking at because it is classified information and he is a

whistleblower."

3/6

After Goodman accused Klayman of engaging in "rhetoric and argument," he asked him to

relate "in factual format the description of the other information turned over besides the software" (p. 20).

Klayman responded that "It, basically, is evidence of mass surveillance of American citizens ...

It includes credit card numbers, banking information, names of millions of Americans."

After a recess necessitated by unfinished business from a previous case hearing, Klayman

continued detailing his client's deposition the previous day, stating, "He has information that

government agencies, much like happened with NSA and Edward Snowden and others have

been doing massive surveillance on American citizens, including federal judges, magistrates,

members of Congress and others and operating illegally here in the United States, CIA."

Edward Snowden was an NSA contractor who left the country in early june 2013 and

released classified information to The Guardian regarding the scope of the NSA's collection

of Americans' personal information, whether or not they are suspected of terrorist activity or planning.

When Goodman impatiently asked Klayman how arrangements were made for Montgomery

to turn over the information to the FBI, Klayman said that [U.S. District Court Royce C.]

Lamberth "had contacted the FBI because of information that Mr. Montgomery had" (p. 21 ).

Klayman then explained that he approached Lamberth because he was acquainted with

him from cases arising during the '90s and his belief that Lamberth is "an extremely

reputable and honest person with great integrity." Klayman stated that his purpose in contacting Lamberth was to find a way to convey Montgomery's "information," which he said

was classified, "to the government."

"I didn't look at it. Nobody looked at it, but we wanted to come forward and because Mr.

Montgomery, long before he became my client had been trying, as I mentioned earlier, to

come forward as a whistle blower to various government agencies and nobody wanted to

listen to him," Klayman told Goodman.

On june 30, Klayman filed a lawsuit representing Montgomery against ACLU President Susan

Herman and the attorneys representing the Melendres plaintiffs, claiming that in an ethical

breach, they had failed to disclose that Montgomery had approached them with the same

information which he later provided to Arpaio.

When Goodman commented that Klayman's approaching Lamberth seemed "somewhat

unorthodox," Klayman responded, "It is unorthodox because this has never been done

before. We have never been in this situation," not identifying exactly what the "situation" is.

4/6

Klayman indicated that "the general counsel of the FBI james Baker [sic] facilitated bringing

in a team of agents to turn it over," meaning Montgomery's information, which Klayman

indicated also was provided to the U.S. Department of justice. Klayman added that

Montgomery "has continuing access to documentation which is not classified ... so if there is

anything that we need from what was turned over, it is still accessible to Mr. Montgomery" (p. 26).

After Goodman asked if a contract was executed defining Montgomery's ownership or

rights to the information, Klayman responded that "There is a document that was

produced. It's a letter prepared by the U.S. attorney on behalf of the justice Department,

which says that, in effect, Mr. Montgomery has immunity for turning this over in terms of the documentation."

On page 28 of the transcript, Klayman told the court that Montgomery retained the "top

secret clearance" he had been given while working as a contractor for the CIA and NSA following the September 11 attacks.

Klayman then stated that he and his client oppose the Risen defendants' motion to extend

the September 16 deadline because "Montgomery is seriously ill and he may not live."

Klayman claimed that as a result, "the FBI is moving with great speed on this ... "

On April 30, Klayman was quoted as having contended in a legal brief filed in his NSA lawsuit that "U.S. intelligence agencies have 'harvested' the personal and private data of 'hundreds of federal officials and judges, including Chief justice john Roberts and justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg,"' citing Montgomery's research.

Klayman then informed the court that during his recent deposition of Risen, Risen said that

the statements he made about Montgomery in his book did not arise from classified information. Klayman asserted that consequently, the materials turned over to the DOj and FBI were not relevant to Risen's defense.

Page 33 of the transcript quotes Klayman as having said that Montgomery's "other stuff' "deals with a massive breach of individual privacy throughout the United States and that

has nothing to do with this case."

Goodman concluded asking Klayman questions and shifted to the defense counsel, who

insisted that Montgomery's software is "critically relevant" to proving or disproving that

Risen made defamatory statements about Montgomery in his book by describing

Montgomery's software as "bogus." Atty. Larry Klayman, CIA Dennis Montgomery, Edward Snowden, eTreppid Technologies,

FBI, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt individual privacy, lames Risen. ludge G. Murray Snow.

ludge Royce C. Lamberth, Maricopa County, Melendres et al v. Arpaio et al, NSA Sheriff

loseph M. Arpaio, The New York Times, U.S. Department of lustice

5/6

��

�� !"��#�� $�%��&% ��'��(� �� )*+,-./*,012345.06��!"6!�6��6��(�� ( ��(��%�(�% ��(��(%��(� �� 67�8�9:��:;9:<��=>��=�8>�8$&�#?�@AB�CDEFGH�IGHJKEL�� !"��M��N(!O(� �� N�� N� ��PKQKHJFKRS�KT�EQUV�WFXEYGS�KT�EQ�� 8 ��? Z�� [�� N �:\�� :�� %�� [��N��% ��7��]�� :�� @�� :��N��:��? Z�� %�]�� % �� [��!_�� a��b�� ? Z��c��%�� b ��:�� %��]��Z ��N�� ? Z��c�� N��% ��7��b��]�@

�� !"�� #��!$��%��"��&&��'(&��'�!&��)*��+��"��,)�)��"��&&�� %��!��-.!��'�� "��&��"��&&��)�/��&�� % ��"��&��0��1�!��/�&��'��&�)!��% � ��%��&��%��+��"�'��-.!)��.��'��'��&��,0��%��+�&��"��0�� 0��+��'��'��2/��%��'��&��&��-.!��&��"��%��+��%��%��+��"��'��&��)�� % �� "��"��%��+��+��"��"��&��&��)�3��%��+��'��+��"��"��+��"��%�'��&�''��%��'��&��'��&��) ��4��5��&��0��+��'��6��7��-��"��%��8��&��&��'��"��'��"��!�& �9��:�)��0��+��+��'��0��1�!��'��'��"��&��)��0��'��'��&��"��&�� '��"��%��&)0�� 4��5��&��%��0��+��'��(��*�% ��-.!)�!��"��+��"��%��"�� &��&&�� 0��+��'��&��'��'��"�� !&��;��"��,0��%��+��&��%��).�� 0��'��<��'� ��"��'�'��' ��"��&�� "��8��)��0��+��'��0��&��'�� +��4!��"��"��"��'��"��'��&��"��)��0��&��"��"��%��%��&��'��%��)��=�%�� >��0��&��%��;��"��<��)�/��%��+��'��&�&%��'�-��"��'��&��+��"��%��%��'��+��"��'��'��"��"��&�� <��"��%��+�� ,0�)-��"��%��'��&��0��%��%��'��'��&��)9��4��&�� "��''��)

�� !��"�#��$��%��&� ��$�� '��(��"�#�� )�*+�� "�#��*��,�� -�� ./0.��$��1��%�� -�� 2#�%�� 1��%��3�� '��+�� (��4�� 2#�%!�� '&�5�� "�#��(��)��!��"�#�� 6��6�� 2#�%�� )��!�$��7�� 1��%�� 8.�� 099:��2�� + �� "� ��#��$�� 9;00��-��#��./0<��%�#�7�� %��!��%�� "�#��3�� '�� (��=��-� �� &��./08�#�� %�� 7��#��* ��>7#*?�'��@A�� *��(%�� '7��(�� '7�� (#�� !��B�� %��!��

�� !�� "��#��$�%��"� ��&� ��'�� "��$�#��"�� ( �)��"� �� *�!��#��+��$��,-.�� ( �)�� "��"��/(�� "��'� �� # ��#��#�� 0#��$��'�� (��+ �� ( �)�� &�1-,23$��4,&�� ( �)�� %� ��+ �� (��'�5��'��6�� +�� 7+��*��(��$��( �)��5��4�� #��# ��$(��'��%�� 8��#��+�#��#�� 5��#��+��&2$( �)�� '��( �)��9�� #��#��"�� #�� !��'��#�� "��#�� $��( �)��9��+��7��"�� "�� 7�� 9��#��#��1��&&,&.3�� #��$�� #� ��#�7��#�� 6��%��:. �� "��$��( �)�� "��#��8��"�� $( �)��+ ��9��"��7�� (��'��"��6�� +��$��( �)�� + ��#��# ��'��# �

�� !"��#�� $�� %��#�� #��&��'��(��)*)�� #�+,-.!/0��1 �� #2��3",!� �� 4��)��(��5��$�� $�� #�� 6��'��#�� 678��#�� 9��6�� ,:."3�� ;�� %�7��#�� <��=��>��#��)�� #�� ?��;�� #�� #��;�� #��;��8�� 3","� �� <�� #�� @�� 7��A��#��)��B��(�� # 7�� #��@�� (��@��,"��3",!��88�9��@��(�� B��9�� #

�� !��"�� #��$��$�%��&"��$��$��#�� "�� '��(��$��#�"�� $$�� '��#��)"��$��*��!��$��$�� "'��+,�� $�� "��$��$��$�� *�-�� $��....�"��$��(��#��'��-�$��/��0��123245627�� "��8��9��(��:;�:��8�$��,��(��$��$��:;�;��'��*��<��$��8�$��*��,��:;�:��8�$��*��9��-��::��=��,��*��-��=��$��:;�:��'��<��>?��$��$��@��,�#��A�B��:;;+��C��$�� "�

��

�� !"�� #��$�%�$��&'%��$��()�(#��*� ��*�� &� �� *�$��&#�� *�� *��+�� $��&�� +� � ��*�� $��+�$��,��"��$�� +�$��*��!��*��'�*��$�� -� ��.��+��*��/��$��*��$��0�$��(0��$��*� �$��&�$��#��!��*��'��+� � ��!*��$�'��1%�$��2�� *��#�+��+��#��+�� &��#��*��$��#��$��2��/��3�+��()�)#�� +��+� ��$�� !��$��*�4$��+��&56��$�� *�� $��'�� +�� *�+��*��$��&��+��"��$��()�(#� �� +��0��$��$��7��$��-��&��&��8��&()))�+�� !��&��$��*��&��%��$��0��$��&��$��&��+�� *�� +��$��*�� *�(#)))�� *�$��*�(#9))'��8�3�� !�� '��%��$��&#��0��$��$��+�� &�� $��$��*��&��$�� ,��*�� 7��$��-��&��+��$��+� �:);<��*��+�� 9=>< ��$�� *��8��&��$�� $�� *�� 8��$�#��&/��&�()�;#��$��&��2��,��?��*�� *� ��%��$��&��$��$��*��$$��$��+�� ()�(��$��$�� -��&�$��&��#�,��?��*�� .��$��*�� $��()�)#�� +�$��*��$� �� *�� **��*� ��$��#��$�� /�%

�� !��"��#��"�$��"�� %��"��"��&�� "��'��"(�� "(��"��"��" ��)�� *(�� !�� #��!��#��"��!�� #�+��"�� ,��(��-��.��/��%��"��(��(��"��011 ��+��2��%��" �� (345467849��2� �:��(��2��";�� ;��(��!��<�(�� #:��"��="��=�� >�� ) ��;��(��"��2��(?��?(��-��?��(��%��%��)��@��=-�� >��'��-��"(��!��"��#��!��<�=A1#��!��$#�� #%��;�@��(��(�� %��"� ��?��)��(��%��@��)��!�� (#%��"��"��!'��"��(#%��!��$#�� !��#>�� $��"��"(�� !�� #��%��! ��#��

�� !��"��#��$�%��&��'��"��(��!��)��&�)��&��$�*�� $

+�� ,��$-.�� &��&��!��-��&��$,��!��"��&��"��'��(��'��&��$(+��/��%��'��,�+$(��'��(��"0�1��2��$�3��4��1�� *��5��*+��*��*��*��#��/��#��6��+��0��*��5��)��,�+��)�*��0��3��3��/��*��%��/��&$��/� ��%��6)��!��"��7�� /��2��$��)��)��0��)�$�3��*��,3��8��*��8��9��8��:��8��;��<$)$�*��<�)=>?@�A>BC?B�D>EFGH?EIGJK�LEF>BCJEI�MJN?�ONGH?EP?�>F�Q>I?RSGTTGETU��)��#�� V

News max

Nunes Must Ask FBI's Corney About Montgomery Mass Surveillance Case Sunday, March 19,2017 01:04PM

By: Larry Klayman

The old expression about Washington, D.C., is that if you want a friend, get a dog! In the case of President Donald Trump, this is a lesson he has undoubtedly learned in his thus far short tenure as the commander in chief. Nowhere is this seen more than over the current controversy concerning the president's claims that he was wiretapped, that is, illegally spied upon, by his predecessor's administration, former President Barack Obama.

As I have written in this Newsmax blog and elsewhere particularly of late, my client, former NSA and CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery, holds the keys to disproving the false claims of those representatives and senators on the House and Senate intelligence committees, reportedly as well as FBI Director James Corney, that there is no evidence that the president and his men were wiretapped.

Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama's former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama's former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed "up close and personal" this "Orwellian Big Brother" intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.

But when Montgomery came forward as a whistleblower to congressional intelligence committees and various other congressmen and senators, including Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, like Corney, once had a reputation for integrity, he was "blown off;" no one wanted to even hear what he had to say. The reason, I suspect, is that Montgomery's allegations were either too hot to handle, or the congressional intelligence and judiciary committees already knew that this unconstitutional surveillance was being undertaken. Moreover, given the power of the NSA, CIA, and DNI, for congressional committee heads to take action to legitimately and seriously investigate and if necessary recommend prosecution of officials like Clapper and Brennan could, given the way Washington works, result in the spy agencies disclosing and leaking (as occurred recently with General Michael Flynn), the details of their mass surveillance, ruining the careers if not personal lives of any politician who would take them on.

After Montgomery was turned away as a whistleblower, he came to me at Freedom Watch. With the aid of the Honorable Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who I had come to respect

and trust over the years of my public interest advocacy, we brought Montgomery forward to FBI Director James Corney, through his General Counsel James Baker. Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like thenbusinessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration. He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering resulted in helping Obama to win the White House.

This interview, conducted and videoed by Special FBI Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, occurred almost two years ago, and nothing that I know of has happened since. It would appear that the FBI's investigation was buried by Corney, perhaps because the FBI itself collaborates with the spy agencies to conduct illegal surveillance. In landmark court cases which I filed after the revelations of Edward Snowden, the Honorable Richard Leon, a colleague of Judge Lamberth, had ruled that this type of surveillance constituted a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. (See www.freedomwatchusa.org for more information.)

A few months ago, given FBI's seeming inaction in conducting a bona fide timely investigation of the treasure trove of information Montgomery had produced and testified to, I went to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Judiciary Committee, as I had done earlier with Senator Grassley, since Montgomery had revealed that judges had been spied upon, and asked his staff to inquire of Director Corney the status of the investigation. I have heard nothing back from Goodlatte or his staff and they have not responded to recent calls and emails.

So last Thursday, I traveled to Capital Hill to personally meet with Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.) of the House Intelligence Committee and, when his scheduler claimed that he was "unavailable," forcefully pushed for a meeting with one of his committee lawyers, Allen R. Souza, and fully briefed him about Montgomery and the FBI's apparent cover-up. I told this staff intel lawyer to inform Chairman Nunes of the facts behind this apparent cover-up before the committee holds its hearing on the alleged Trump wiretaps and questions Corney this Monday, March 20, in open session. My expressed purpose: to have Chairman Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee ask Corney, under oath, why he and his FBI have seemingly not moved forward with the Montgomery investigation.

During my meeting with House Intelligence Committee counsel Allen R. Sousa I politely warned him that if Chairman Nunes, who himself had that same day undercut President Trump by also claiming that there is no evidence of surveillance by the Obama administration, I would go public with what would appear to be the House Intelligence Committee's complicity in keeping the truth from the American people and allowing the FBI to continue its apparent cover-up of the Montgomery "investigation."

And, that is where it stands today. The big question: will House Intelligence Committee Chairman Nunes do his job and hold FBI Director Corney's feet to the fire about the Montgomery investigation?

Please watch the House Intelligence Committee hearing closely this Monday.

Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is known for his strong public interest advocacy in furtherance of ethics in government and individual freedoms and liberties. To read more of his reports, Go Here Now.

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 chris@privateamericancitizen .org



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 68

Christopher· Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: 51~·416·8743 email: • 5 I ME sas:ail 4f;..

Certified Mail Receipt No.: 7017 1070 0000 8249 8998

United States Federal Bureau of Investigation <n Christopher Wray, Director· of the FBI 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington,District of Columbia 20530·0001

Attn: Director, Office of Information Policy

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Inf~rmation Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK(CES): SSN: • d andEIN: •nz•

Subject : ANY CES Indiyidual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" Assessment

Director of the Office oflnformation Policy and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a- Freedom oflnfo1·mation Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: M and EIN: ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disclosure process; and

Further, in compliance with requirements of this agency, please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to ·public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <2>, served a copy of the Writ ofMandamus <a>on Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick (4).

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Crypto Currency Resolution Trustc;f the Bahamas fo1· several Court Actions <5> filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

1 https://www .fbi.gov/services/information ·managemen t/foipa 2 https://www.federah·egister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018·20203/imposing·certain·sanctions·in·the ·event·of·foreign· interference·in·a ·united·states·election ll https://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.corn/2018/10/scotus-rule·22·3·writ·of·mandamus·uscaaf-for-preserve·paper-ballots· l0·29· .2018:pdf . 4 https://www.dhs.gov/offi.ce·general·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, .managing the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with relevant statutes and executive orders . .; https://www .scribd.cornldocument/393091608/Crypto·Currency· Resolution·Trust·v· Bitcoi.ll· Blender-Organisation-FILE STAMPED?campaign=VigLink&ad_group=xxclxx&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate

..or about 2 April 2018 are related to the letter and intent of the Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 '<6}; and for which Affiant will be required to .travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile p hone 518·416-8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further. on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who. was not there. and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent 'rom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual" threat to Secretary Homeland Security Secretary Kirstfen M Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: an attorney, in the military, owns a weapon and or goes hunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Unde:r;signed stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities. Exchange Commission Registrant(7) Card, if Mr. Cook needed to speak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F .R. § 5.5(d)(I); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


COUNTY OF WARREN )

Subscribed and Sworn to before me This lt!aay of November 2018

VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT

der penalty of perjury under the laws

s https://www. whitehouse.gov/presidential·actions/executive·order-blocking·property·persons·involved ·serious· human ·rights· abuse-corruption/ 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK • £A COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

U.S. Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT _.,---

.:r Domestic Mail Only

~ iiiiiiiiiiai~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!!!lll~

Cl Cl Cl CJ

WA

te.oo $6.66

Attn: Colonel Lawrence K. Hussey, Intelligence Department Room 1A262B

Postrnarl< Here

11127/2018

Postmark Hel'll

11127/2018 ------

CJ ~~~~~~~====~ f"CJ .-'I

f".-'1 CJ f"-

f"-

$0.50 11/2712018

United States Federal Bureau of Investigation Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington;District of Columbia 20530-0001

Attn: Director, Office oflnformation Policy

U.S. Postal ServiceT~ CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

~ iiiiiiiiiiii~~;l~~gi~!DI!II~~~~~!III~ WA

- ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~ .:r ru ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CJ CJ Cl Cl ~~~~~=~

$0.50

Attn: CAPT Danny Noles, Commander, Office of Naval Intelligence

p~

Here

11/27/2018

Postmark Here

11/2712018

f -----~.-~

Attn: Admiral Charles W. Ray, Assistant Commandant for Intelligence, (CG· 2) U.S. Coast Guard Headqul_lrters J -

CJ CJ CJ CJ

U.S. Postal Service ... CERTIFIED MAIL® RECE~ 't Domestic Mail Only

0846 06

Postmall< Here

CJ ~==~:.=~~~==~ 1"CJ ~. ~~~~~=-----------~ r=l

$0.50 11/27/2018

1"- r.~:;;:;:-~--~~--~--_j_, ___ _ _ r-=1 CJ 1"'-

--

United States National Security Agency Paul M. Nakasone, Director of the NSA Ft. George G. Meade,Maryland 20755·?000

Attn: Director, Office oflnformation Policy : ..

Drug Enforcement Administration DEA El Paso Intelligence Center, Office of National Security Intelligence Fort Bliss, Texas 79918

Attn:. Preston L. Grubbs, Principal Deputy AdmmiStrator DEA El Paso Intelligence Cent"!r

U.S. postal Service"' CEilTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

·\.,

For delivery information, visit our website at www.usps.com . I •

~ ~~«i~=-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~ . ru cO ~se;w;;;s&~~:iii<ibOK;aiii~~~ CJ CJ CJ CJ

CJ I,g~~~~~~==~ 1"'CJ ~~~~~~=-------------~ r=l

Postmall< Here

11/27/2018

~ t;.-~~--- United States Department of Sta:- -~ Cl Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State ·----------··--·--

!"- ~ .. -.,· --"·.-~=-=:;:;;-::""'!f~l~';!~ ~~~telligence and Research ·---------- -------

New York, New York 10016 . .

CJii",

0846 06

Postmark Here

11/2712018

United States Director of Nationallntelligence Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence Information Management Division Washington, District of Columbia 20511

f

I

PS Form 3800, Aprtl 2015 PSN7530.Q2-()()0-9047 everse tor Instructions

Cl 1"'-Cl r=l

Postage

Postrnarl< Here

11/2712018

\

1"'-r=l Cl Siiee 1"'-

aiY::

United States National Reconnaissance Office \ -----National Reconnaissance Office Chantilly,Virginia 20151 .. ---

Attn: Brigadier General Mark A. Baird, Deputy Dir NRO •

U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only .

CJ ~~=::.:::::::;~~===:::.l 1"'-

~ ~~~~~~~-----------J 11127/2018 1"'r=l Cl 1"'-

United States Department of the Air Force Headquarters United States Air Force Lackland AFB

SU.S.AnAF. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reco,maissan~e

an toruo, Texas 78243

Attn: Lt. Gen. David A Deptula, Deputy Chief of Staff .

I

...=! Cl

~ ~~~~~!!~~-.~~~~ []""' =r ~~~~~~~~~~~_;~~r---~~~~~--__J

ru . tO fexi;atseiViii'ieS'a:"Feii~~idiiflie-fii~;rl

Cl Cl Cl Cl

Postmark Here

Cl ~~~~~~~~====~ 1"Cl ~~~~~~----------~ ...=!

11/27/2018

["...=! Cl !"-

Unit;,d steM ~artm~nt of the Army Dtartment of the United States Army U.' . Army Intelligence and Security Command (Inseam) Ft elvoir, Virginia 22060·5246

. . At~n : MG Gary W. Johnston, Commander, INSCOM

Postmark Here

1112712018

United States National Geospatial· Intelligence Agency Robert Cardillo, Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Springfield, Virginia 22150

PS Form 3800, Apnt 2015 PSN 7530-{)2.()()0.9047 See Reverse for Instructions

r-'1 tO

~ ~!!!!~~~~iiiiiiiiiiiii ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~ ru tO ~"SiiVii;oo&i~~~~~~ Cl CJ CJ CJ CJ ~~~~====~~====~ 1"CJ ~~~==~~----------~ M --~L-~~~<.~UL~.

[".-'! CJ ["-

United of the Treasury Steven Terner Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury Department of the United States Treasury Office of Intelligence and Analysis Washington. Dist rict of Columbia 20220

Attn: Sigal P. Mandelker, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

-

[]""' , ~ fi'$Certl:;;mfl;:;:ed:r;Mlial:lfl Efet-=--• ..::

3'--. -45....:...=:..-.!:.....!!.~~!...-~~~~~---l

' cO Ices & Fees (chodc ba1<. tKJd 111e

Cl 0 Return Receipt (hanjcopy) $ -~l..a.'.;!ll...-Cl 0-Receipt (9loclronlc) • so . 00 CJ 0CertllledMiii-Dollwry $ $0.00 Cl 0Adu~Sipture Roquinld $ $0 00

0Adult Signo\tn- DoiiYery $ •

Cl Postage

~ ~$~~~~E$=0~·-5_o ________ ~ r-4 Total Postage end

$ $6.70 !"- F.&m~t~r.~--------~--~==~~~_J-

Postmark Here

11/27/2018

..-:1 United States Defense Intelligence Agency ::2 Sli68i: Lieutenant General Robert P. Ashley, Jr., USA, Director ofthe Defense Intelligence Agency A'ITN' FAC2Al (FOIA) Washington,District of Columbia 20301·7400

Postmark Here

11/27/2018

United States Central Intelligence Agenc ' Gma Haspel, Director of the CIA J_ ;formatwn and Privacy Coordinator

ashington,District of Columbia 20505

\

PS Form 3800, Apnt 2015 PSN 7530;.c)2..000·9047 ee everse 01 Instructions

U.S. Postal Service'M CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

so .oo $().()(1 $(1.00

Postmark I Here

11127/2018 ::2 Postage $0 • 50 Cl ...=! Totat~andfr.JD __ ["- ; . United States Department of State ...=! Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of the Cl U.S. Department of State !"- A/GISIIPS/PP SA-2. Suite 8100

Washington,District of Columbia 20522·0208

Attn: Kellie Robinson, Public Liaison,

-=l ";;J




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 69

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: 518·416·8743 email! ~rivateamericancitizen.org


United States Federal Bureau of Investigation Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI

425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 W ashington.District of Columbia 20530--0001


iegarding: .AMENDMENT for 5 usc §552a ·Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: - Q and EIN: --~~~

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" Assessment

Director of the Office of Information Policy and or whom it may concern,

This is an AMENDMENT to the 27 November 2018 reauest filing wherein Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a ·Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product t·ecords, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name ~HRISTOPHER·EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: and EIN: ; and

That based upon Affiant's actual EZ PASS Statement for November 2018 shown on reverse ~age, 8 November 2018 was the only date Undersigned traveled by his vehicle to meet Agent Tom Donahue and had to be the date Thursday 8 November 2017 rather than the Wednesday 7 November 2018 alleged in Affiant's Affidavit affirmed 27 November 2018 ·a copy attached herewith. The filed Affidavit of 27 November 2018 is amended to read:

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to ;::,peak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on THURSDAY at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then -

Further, on THURSDAY 8 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ...

The undersigned states and declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing and the attached

exhibits are true and correct under 28 USC §1746:

Dated:NovemoeP0,20t8 ~ £A L 0' LakeLuzeme.NewYork ~~~

, Christopher EariStrUDkilleSSs, 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846 Ph: 518-416-87 43; Email: [email protected] All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY CHRISTOPHER STRUNK Statement Date : 2018-11-09 141 HARRIS AVENUE Account Number : 0000000145872595 LAKE LUZERNE, NY 12846 Activity For : 10/09/18 -11/08/18

Beginning Balance $25.00 Replenishment Method VISA

Tolls, Non-Tolls & Fees $5.76 Replenishment Amount $25.00

Payments/Adjustments $0.00 Replenishment Threshold $10.00

Ending Balance $19 24 Tag Deposit $0.00

Stay on top of your E-ZPass Account information! OPT-IN to Mobile Alerts to be notified of low balance, payment status, change in replenishment amount, and more. To sign up, log in to your account, select Account Profile, and provide a mobile phone number in the Account Holder Information section. Read the Terms and Conditions (required) then select Mobile Alerts-- "I agree to the Terms and Conditions and want to Opt-in".

POST ITRANS,TAG NUMBER/,, I ENTRY I EXIT I II _, ·I DATE DATE PLATE AGENCYjPLAZAjDATEjTIMEjPLAZAjDATEjTIMEj PLAN CL AMOUNT BALANCE

11/08/18 11/08/18 00409396233 MTAB&T

RKB • RFK Br • Bronx

RKB 11/08 09:35 STANDARD 1

Thank you for using E-ZPass

Plaza Descriptions

PLEASE CUCK ON THE E-ZPass LOGO BELOW TO CONNECT TO THE E-ZPass NY HOMEPAGE.

I I

$5.76 $ 19.24

U.S. Postal Service'"' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

POSimal1o; Here

11/30/2018 --United States Drug Enforcement Administration - ~~ DEA El Paso Intelligence Center Office of National Security Intelligence Fort Bliss, Texas 79918 . Attn: Preston L. Grubbs, Principal Deputy Adm1mstrator DEA El Paso Intelligence Center

U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

0846 06

Postmark Here

11/30/2018

United States Departm.;_t of the Air Force -,~ Headquarters United States Air Force Lackland AFB U.S.A.F. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissan~e ... . . . ... . San Antonio, Texas 78243 .•••••.•.

Attn: Lt. Gen. David A Deptula, Deputy Chief of Staff •

ostal Servicen• TIFIED MAILw RECEIPT

stlc Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)

/

/ very information visit our website at www.usps.com, f'- flllol .... llil

n ~-----------.--~----~~~~~--------~ . rn rn r:O

$0.00 CJ Return Re<:eipt Fee • 0 ± Certified Fee

CJ ( orsement Required) $1). 00 CJ ~-----.~~r-~

stricted Delivery Fee

0 (Ei>dorsement Required)

0846 06

Postmark Here

rn tO. J..:IJ..,-1 -----'

..JJ Total Postage & Fees $ ___ U.J~-&-

ru United s f,ke'S'¥\,partment of the Navy Department of the United States Navy rn

n 0 ["-

Office of Naval Intelligence, Washington,District of Columbia 20395·5720

Attn: CAPT Danny Noles, Commander, Office of Naval Intelligence

J

U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

rn rn U")

rn For delivery information. VISit our websi te at www.usps.com · .

n CJ CJ CJ

CJ Postage CJ CJ $

$0.50

0846 (16

'='I 11/3012018 n p,TI~ota~IP~oo~tau7e~md~~~~--------------~

~ !ent 1--Uni;ed :t:t~:Department of Energy - --~ CJ Rick Perry, Secretary of the ······ f'-o U.S . Department of Energy

Office. of Intellige':ce and Counterintelligence ·-···· Washington,D1stnct of Columbia 20585 . Attn: Mark Wesley Menezes, Under Secretary of Energy

U.S. Postal Servicen.. CERTIFIED MAILrM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) ...n

f'-o f'-o f'-o For dellverv Information vlslt our website at www.usps.com6

n FORT BELVOI-R,: VA 22060 . - ' rn rn Po~• s 08~6 dJ 06 CJ

Certified Fee $0.00 CJ Retum Receipt Fee

Postmark

CJ (Endorsement Required) $0.00 Here CJ

Restricted Delivery Fee CJ (Endorsement Required)

~ $0. ""'a.,..-------1 ru Total Postage & Fees :t) 11/31)12(118

rn n CJ f'-o

..JJ IT' .:r rn

n . f'-o

f'-o CJ

ucite"htdelfnepart~nt .;f the Army Department of the United States Army U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command <Inscoml Ft Belvoir, Virginia 22060·5246

Attn: MG Gary W. Johnston, Commander, INSCOM

For delivery Information. visit our website at www.usps.com •.

WASHINGfBH Certffied Mall Fee ., ~ l r: $ ~:.. ~·-· Extra ices & Fees (check box, lldd fee •

1 0 Aetlm ~ (hanjoopy) $ __:au.~>L--8 ORetumR~(-.nlc) $ $0.00 Cl OCartiftod Mall_.._ DolivWy s --ffh{t(l---

Postmark Here

o 0Adu" SigJ1abJre Requlsod .. . $ $(1 60 0 Adult Slgn11!\n R901!1ctod Dellve<y $ •

f'-o n CJ ["-

11/30/2018

United States Coast Guard U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Coast Guard Intelligence Washington,District of Columbia 20593·7301

Attn: Admiral Charles W. Ray, Assistant Commandant for Intelligence, (CG·2) U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters

l

J .

.

IT'

U.S. Postal Servicem CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

~ iGiiiiiiiiiiiiiji~iij~~~~Dm~~~~~~~~ ~ k~-=~M~m~I~F~~-$3JL.~-5~~~L_~~~~~~~~--~ r:Q $ ceo ees (checlcbcl>r. _,..,~

0 Alm.m Rapt (lwllcof>l') $ • g 0AollmRnpt(oloclra<>c) $ $0.00 0 OCortttlod Moll- 0o11wry s $Q. OQ Cl 0~ 5q>oiJ.n floqulnld s $ 0 • 00

Postmarlc Here

D sv-re Reotrictedlleilwly s ~ p $0.50 Cl ~~~~7F.~-----------1 ..-'!

11/30/2018

~ ~~====~~~~~~==~------~ ..-:1 United States Defense Intelligence Agency Cl Sii8etm Lieutenant General Robert P. Ashley, Jr., USA, 1"'- Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency

ATTN: FAC2A1 (FOIA)

ru ...!1

Washington, District of Columbia 20301·7400


~ ~~~"~~~~mmmzm=mm~~~ . IT" b--=-....,.,.,,..,..,~--=----'"--=--=:.....:;.--"-_.:.;:T---=---'=---"'=----'

.:!" ru <O FExtni:lii'\iiCiiirn;eiiifdiiij~~..:~~~ t::l t::l Cl 0

Postmark Here

o k!=!:~~~~~~~===.j ~

0 ~~~~~~~------------~ ..-:!

11/30/2018

~ ~~~--------------------~---------------, ..-:! 0 f'-

- Unit;d States Central Intelligence Agency Gina Haspel, Director of the CIA Information and Privacy Coordmator, Washington, District of Columbia 20505

PS Form 3800, Apr112Q15 PSN7';30-0Nl00-9047 See Reverse lor Instructions

r:Q .::r..-:1 IT"

U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Ma11 Only

For dellv~ mformation. vis1t our website at www.usps.com •.

!T" b-=-~~------~~~~~~--~----~--~ ::r ru r:Q ~~~=-~~~~~~~~rl

t::l 0 Cl 0 t::l ~~~~~~~====~ f'- $0.50

Postmark Here

0 ~~~--~~=-------------~ 11/30/2018 ..-:!

~ ..-'! t::l ~

United States Marine Corps Marine Corps Inte!ligenceRo 1 A'J.6?B

D artment om - ~ ' Intelligence ep . f C lumbia 20350·3000 Washington,D,strlct o 0

1 L ce K Hussey, Attn: Colone a wren . om 1A262B Intelligence Department Ro

~ .:!" ru IT'

~ Postage $0 • SO 0 $ 11/30/2018 ..-:! :otlll PosUge and '$6. 70 -

~ s.r-"lJnited States National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Cl §i Robert Cardillo, Director of the ~ National Geospatial·Intelligence Agency

Qi Springfield,Virginia 22150

PS Form 3800. Apnl 201 5 PSN 7530-02-Q00--0047 See Reverse for lnstrUC110 ns

Cl postage

1"'- ~$~==~~$=0~.5~0~------~ Cl otal Poatage and Fen

..-:! s $6.70 11/30/2018

~"'- Sen ..-:! c::J -s;ro 1"'-

United States National Reconnaissance Office National Reconnaissance Office N(;"]r ~ ~, -------

.:!" ru ..-:! rr

IT'

Chantilly,Virginia 20151

CI/Y Attn: Brigadier General Mark A. Baird, Deputy Dir NRO


.::r- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------J 08~6 ru

~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ II>} 06

0 Cl Cl 0

Postmarf(

Here

11/3012018

United t>tates Director of National intelligence Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence Information Management Division Washington,District of Columbia 20511

l

PS Form 3800. Apnt 2015 PSt'l ~~ 02...()0().0047 See Re verse for lnstruct •on s

m U1 n..J ...c

CJ r-'1


~ ~~~~~----------~ CJ 11 /30/2018

..JJ r-'1 CJ

. r'"

Urn ted States Federal Bureau of Investigation Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington,District of Columbia 20530-0001

Attn: Director, Office ofinformation_::P~ol~ic~y---Jillm!!!!!!!B


Postmmk Here

11/30/2018

~ Sentia.... United-States Nati;:;;l Security Agen~y - -Cl '§;~ Paul M. Nakasone, Director of the NSA f'- Ft. George G. Meade,Maryland 20755·6000

Attn: Director, Office oflnformation Policy everse tor lnstructrons

r-'1 m r-'1 ~

U.S. Postal Service'M CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~--__j 0846

06 n..J . ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CJ CJ CJ CJ

CJ ~~~~~~~~====~ $0.50 1"

CJ ~~~~=n~------------~ r-'1

1"'r-'1 Cl 1"'-

Urn ted States Department of State Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State Bureau of intelligence and Research 90ParkAve New York, New York 10016

Postmart< Here

11/30/2018


0846 06

Postmarlc Here

11/30/2018


Cl m

~ ~~~~~iji~~ii~iiiiiii lr ~ ~~«i.~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~ n..J ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cl Cl Cl CJ

Postmark Here

Cl ~~~~~~~~======~ 1"' $0.50 CJ ~~~==~~~------------~ r-'1

11/30/2018

1"'.-'1 CJ f'-

Uruted States Department of the Treasury Steven Terner Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury Department of the Uruted States Treasury Office of Intelligence and Analysis Washington, District of Columbia 20220

Attn: Sigal P. Mandelker, Under Secretru.-y for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

--u.s. Postal Service'M CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only

Postmark Here

I

11/30/2018

~ -~

[

United States Departme;;-t of Ffumeland Securi Kirstjen M. Nielsen, SeGretary of ty j Department of Homeland Security ~~e Privacy Office, Office oflntel!igence and Analysis "ashington,DistrJCt of Columbia 20528·0655 -----.----

Attn: Sam Kaplan, Chief Privacy Officer/Chief FOIA Officer The Privacy Office




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 70

• C

om

ple

te it

em

s 1,

2, a

nd

3.

• P

rin

t yo

ur n

am

e a

nd

ad

dre

ss o

n th

e re

vers

e so

tha

t we

ca

n r

etur

n th

e c

ard

to y

ou.

• C

om

ple

te i~ms

1, 2

, an

d 3

.:

\

I~-< -

;: ~

tl A

ddre

ssee

I

• 'P

rin

t yo

ur r

iani

s--a

nd 'td

dreSs.

~.Q. ~

11~{ev

erse

· ·

· ·

-..

I. so

tha

t we

can

ret

urn

the

car

d tQ

. ytil

!r:

• A

ttac

h th

is c

ard

to th

e b

ack

of t

he

·mai

lpie

ce,

-•

Att

ach

this

ca

rd to

the

ba

ck o

f th

e m

ailp

iece

, o

r o

n th

e fr

on

t if

Arti

cle

Add

ress

ed to

: U

nite

d S

tate

s D

epar

tmen

t of t

he N~

~ D

epar

tmen

t of t

he

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Nav

y O

ffic

e of

Nav

al In

tell

igen

ce,

· W

ashi

ngto

n,D

istr

ict o

f C

olum

bia

2039

5·57

20

Att

n: C

APT

Dan

ny N

oles

, C

omm

ande

r,

Off

ice

of N

aval

Inte

llig

ence

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llll\1

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

item

1?

If Y

ES, e

nter

del

iver

y ad

dres

s be

low

:

··.·

iAauJ

t ;:ng

nawr

e Ac

iWt S

igna

ture

Res

trict

ed D

elive

ry

Cer

tified

Mal

l®

d M

all R

esbl

ctad

Del

ivery

0 P

rior

ity M

all E

xpre

ss®

D

Reg

ister

ed M

aiiTM

D

f!eg

tste

red

Mal

l Res

trict

ed

Deliv

ery

'

I u

""'u

utn.

" on

Del

iver

y ..

•

• •

• •

• •

... L

"

0 Co

llect

on

Deliv

ery R

estri

cted

Deli

very

0 Re

tum

Rec

eipt

for

Mer

chan

dise

D

Sig

natu

re C

onfln

natio

nr"

D S

igna

ture

Con

finna

tion

Rest

ricte

d De

liver

y 7

76

9

Form

381

1, J

uly

20

15

PSN

753

0-02

-00D

-905

3

··--

-

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1

, 2, a

nd

3.

• P

rint

yo

ur

nam

e a

nd

ad

dre

ss o

n t

he

rev

erse

so

tha

t we

ca

n r

etur

n th

e c

ard

to y

ou.

• A

ttach

th

is c

ard

to th

e b

ack

of t

he

mai

lpie

ce,

or

on

the

fro

nt if

sp

ace

,.., •

--sur

ed M

all Re

stric

ted

Deliv

ery

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

1. A

rticl

e A

ddre

ssed

to:

II D

. Is

del

ivet

y ad

dres

s di

ffere

nt fr

om it

em 1

? If

YES

, ent

er d

eliv

ety

addr

ess

belo

w:

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

f th

e A

ir F

orce

~

Hea

dqua

rter

s U

nite

d S

tate

s A

ir F

orce

Lac

klan

d A

FI!.

U.S

.A.F

. In

tell

igen

ce,

Sur

veil

lanc

e an

d R

econ

nais

sanc

e/

San

Ant

onio

, Tex

as 7

8243

Att

n: L

t. G

en.

Dav

id A

. Dep

tula

, D

eput

y C

hief

of S

taff

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllll

3.

Ser

vice

Typ

e 0

Adul

t Sig

natu

re

Adul

t Sig

natu

re R

estri

cted

Deli

very

C

ertifi

ed M

all®

C

ertifi

ed M

all R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

0 Pr

iorit

y M

all E

xpre

ss®

0 Re

giste

red

Mai

lm

0 Re

gist

ered

Mail

Res

trict:

De

liver

y Cl

Ret

um R

ecei

pt fo

r M

eroh

andls

e j

I 0 C

olle

ct o

n De

liver

y 2.

A

rticl

e N

umbe

r {Tr

ansf

er fr

om s

ervi

ce fa

be/1

0

Col

lect

on

Deliv

ery

Reslr

lcted

Deli

very

In

sure

d M

ail

0 Si

gnat

ure

Con

firm

atio

n,.

D S

igna

ture

Con

firm

atio

n Re

stric

ted

Deliv

ery

: 7 0

17

1

0 7

0 0

0 0

0 8

2 4

9 9

15

5

[nsu

ffi!!M

ail R

estri

cted

Deli

very

PS

For

m 3

811,

Ju

ly 2

015

PSN

753

D-0

2-00

0-90

53

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

or

on t

he

fro

nt

if 1.

Arti

cle

Add

ress

ed to

: lt

nit

ed

Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

f th

e T

reas

ury

~tev

en T

erne

r M

nuch

in, S

ecre

tary

of t

he T

reas

ury

bep

artm

ent

of th

e U

nite

d S

tate

s T

reas

ury

Off

ice

of In

tell

igen

ce a

nd A

naly

sis

Was

hing

ton,

Dis

tric

t of

Col

umbi

a 20

220

:Sig

al P

. Man

delk

er,

Und

er S

ecre

tary

for

Ter

rori

sm a

nd

Fin

anci

al In

tell

igen

ce

D.

Is d

eliv

ety

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

item

1?

If Y

ES, e

nter

del

ivet

y ad

dres

s be

low

:

DPr

iorlc

y 0

Regls

t<

0=~

r M

all R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

0

Ret

urn

l--:,-

~-;::-

-::-::

--:--:

-:---:

---=--

-=--=-

---,-_

,..-,.

.-----

-11 D C

olle

ct o

n De

liver

y M

erch

· •

..

• ••

· ~--

I'T'~"

~I'orf

Ynm -n

lice /a

be/)

0 C

olle

ct o

n De

liver

y Res

trict

ed D

elive

ry

D S

igna

l 0

Insu

red

Mai

l 0

Sign

a!

IIIIII

IIIIII

IU II l II

l Ill 1

111111

111\111

11 l Ill

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

07 4

9 52

DODO

82

49

9230

• C

om

ple

te it

em

s 1

, 2,

and

3.

• P

rin

t yo

ur

nam

e an

d a

dd

ress

on

the

reve

rse

so· t

ha

t we

can

ret

urn

the

car

d to

you

. •

Att

ach

this

car

d to

the

ba

ck o

f th

e m

ailp

iece

, o

r o

n th

e fr

ont

if 1.

Arti

cle

Add

ress

ed to

: ·

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

f th

e N

avy

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Nav

y O

ffic

e of

Nav

al I

ntel

lige

nce,

W

ashi

ngto

n, D

istr

ict o

f C

olum

bia

2039

5·57

20

Att

n: C

APT

Dan

ny N

oles

, C

omm

ande

r,

Off

ice

of N

aval

Int

elli

genc

e

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllllllll

llllll

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

07 4

5 56

0 In

sure

d M

ail R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

Re

stri•

(ove

r$50

0) -----------

Dom

estic

D.

Is d

eliv

ety

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

Item

1?

If Y

ES, e

nter

del

lvet

y ad

dres

s be

low

:

~

_ R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

,,.

..,e

rtJfle

d M

all®

:1 M

all R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

0 Pr

iorit

y D

Aeg

lst<

DR

egls

tt

J I w

\JV

IIt;

:'Y

\ on

Del

iver

y -

· -~

~-

-se

rvic

e Ia

bell

D C

olle

ct o

n De

liver

y R

estri

cted

Del

ivery

-

. lSUr

ed M

ail

.

Deliv

er

OR

etum

M

erch

: D

Sign

al<

0 Si

gna!<

Re

stric

Rest

ricte

d De

liver

y

, Ju

ly 2

01

5 P

SN 7

53Q

-02-

00D

-905

3 D

omes

tic

• C

ompl

ete

Item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

car

d to

you

. •

Atta

ch th

is c

ard

to th

e ba

ck o

f the

mai

lpie

ce,

on th

e fro

nt if

Un

ited

Sta

tes

Nat

iona

l G

eosp

atia

l· In

tell

igen

ce A

genc

y R

ober

t C

ardi

llo,

Dir

ecto

r of

the

Nat

iona

l G

eosp

atia

l· In

tell

igen

ce A

genc

y S

prin

gfie

ld, V

irgi

nia

2215

0

111111

111111

11111

111111

111111

111111

111111

11111

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

07 4

9 69

Si

gnat

ure

Res

trict

ed D

ellve

JY

certi

fied

Mai

l®

ON

o

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to

you.

•

Atta

ch th

is c

ard

to th

e ba

ck o

f the

mai

lpie

ce,

or o

n th

e fro

nt if

Un

ited

Sta

tes

Fed

eral

Bur

eau

ofln

vest

igat

ion

Chr

isto

pher

Wra

y, D

irec

tor

of t

he

FB

I 14

25 N

ew Y

ork

Ave

nue

NW

, S

uite

110

50

Was

hing

ton,

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

2053

0·00

01

~ •

Att

n: D

irec

tor,

Off

ice

of In

form

atio

n P

olic

y

X

B.

Rec

eive

d b

y (P

rinte

d N

ame)

D.

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

If Y

ES

, ent

er d

eliv

ery add~

lf.u~

lo~

' ~·~

0

/ .• "·

( I

d o

,}

o P

norit

y M

ail E

xpre

ss®

l

IIIIIIIII

IIIIJIIIII

IIIIIJII

IIIIIIIIII

IIIIIIII

I g ~~

~~~:;~:r

;: Rest

ricte

d oe

lweJ

Y g ~:

0 R

egis

tere

d M

ail'"

J

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

0745

94

li!rtif

ied

Mal

l®

.Of

0 fle

glst

ered

Mai

l Res

trict

ed .

D

Cer

tifie

d M

all R

estri

cted

Del

iveJY

C

l R•

Dellv

eJY

0 C

olle

ct o

n D

eliv

eJY

M

0 R

etum

Rec

elpt

for

2. .

Art

icle

Num

ber

(Tra

nsfe

r fro

m s

ervi

ce la

bel)

D C

olle

ct o

n D

eliv

eJY

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

0 SJ

M

erch

andi

se

'l In

sure

d M

ail

0 Si

0

Cer

tifie

d M

ail R

estri

cted

Del

iveJY

l-

:;;-

:-.;

-;--

;-;-

--;-

-::;

:--:

--:.

----

:--:

--:-

-:-

----1

0 C

olle

ct o

n O

elive

JY

.2. .

Art

icle

Num

ber

(Tra

nsfe

r fro

m s

ervi

ce la

bel)

D C

olle

ct o

n De

liveJ

Y R

estri

cted

Oel

lveJ

Y In

sure

d M

ail

0 Si

gnat

ure

Con

flrm

atlo

nm

-, 7

O 17

1

O 7 O

O O

O O

8 2

4 9

8

9 9

8 I I

nsur

ed M

\1'1

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

eJY

R•

0 Si

gnat

ure

Con

firm

atio

n . (

over

$50

0

70

17

1

07

0

DODO

8

24

9

92

47

P

SF

orm

, J

uly

2015

PSN

753

0·02

-00G

-905

3

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to

you.

•

Atta

ch th

is c

ard

to th

e ba

ck o

f the

mai

lpie

ce,

or o

n th

e fro

nt if

soa

ce p

erm

its.

1. A

rtic

le A

ddre

ssed

to:

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Nat

iona

l Geo

spat

iaH

ntel

lige

nce

Age

ncy

Rob

ert C

ardi

llo, D

u·ec

tor

of th

e ·

Nat

iona

l deo

spat

ial·

Inte

llig

ence

Age

ncy

Spr

ingf

ield

, Vir

gini

a 22

150

111111

111111

111111

11111

11111

11111

111111

111111

1

2. A

rtic

le N

umbe

r

PS F

orm

381

1, Ju

ly 2

015

PSN

753

0·02

-00G

-905

3

!~_s~~M_~il

Res

trict

ed D

ellve

JY

dult

$ign

$.Jr

e R

ewic

ted

DeUv

eJY

iAO

u!l S

lgna

tt.ua

eft!

~ed~

alt®

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

I P

S F

orm

381

1, J

uly

2015

PSN

753

0-02

:000

-905

3

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to

you

. •

Atta

ch th

is c

ard

to th

e ba

ck o

f the

mai

lpie

ce,

or

on th

e fro

nt if

1. Ar

t~;t

.;;:= J~ ~

, (t

,'t"f

fV'o

r ~ f

'/Jc.

~

qfftJ

-O fl~#.~ {

l,yef

o

Dom

e

X

B.

\N M~\L

CEN1

"' pr

: 11

t~li

t:5". ~ 6

I

r.z.t7

1 «

-6 ~ J

.L-jg:

: :::::::_:::

;::_ .=_ ;::

: ___

==

==

=

D ~Mr

ul~

111111

111111

111111

11111

111111

111111

111111

11111

D

AQ

unS

ignm

ureR

esbi

cted

DeU

veJY

0

Reg

iste

red

Mal

fTh'

~rtlfled M

ail®

Cl

Reg

l~i;

IMai

iRes

tric

ted

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

07 4

9 45

0

Cer

tifle

dMai

iRes

tr!ct

edD

ellv

el)l

Dellv

eJY

0 C

olle

ct o

n D

ellv

el)l

Cl R

elum

~ipt fo

r 2.

A

rtic

le N

umbe

r (fi

rans

fer f

rom

ser

vice

labe

l) 9

Col

lect

on

~eli

very

Res

trict

ed D

elive

JY

Mero

hand

Jsi!

· In

sure

d M

all

0 Si

gnat

ure

Con

firm

atio

n""'

7 0

17

1

0 7

0 0

0 0

0 8

2 4

9 9

2 2

3 lns

ure_

d.M

all R

estri

cted

Oel

lvel

)l 0

Sign

atur

e C

onlllm

atlo

n R

estri

cted

Del

iver

y PS

For

m

, Jul

y 20

15 P

SN 7

530-

02.0

00·9

053

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

OP

r D

Rt os:

OR

E M

OS

I•

OS

i; Ri

Do

me

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to

you.

•

Atta

ch th

is c

ard

to th

e ba

ck o

f the

mai

lpie

ce,

or o

n th

e fro

nt if

• C

ompl

ete

Item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to y

ou.

• A

ttach

thi

s ca

rd to

the

back

of t

he m

ail p

iece

, on

the

front

if

1. A

rticl

e A

ddre

ssed

to:

D.

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

item

1?

D.

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

item

If

YES

, ent

er d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

belo

w

If Y

ES, e

nter

del

iver

y ad

dres

s be

low

: U

nite

d :::

ltate

s D

rug

.l!:n

forc

emen

t Adm

inis

trat

ion

DE

A E

l P

aso

Inte

llig

ence

Cen

ter,

U

nite

d S

tate

s D

efen

se I

ntel

lige

nce

Age

ncy

Lie

uten

ant

Gen

eral

Rob

ert

P. A

shle

y, J

r., U

SA,

Dir

ecto

r of

the

Def

ense

Int

elli

genc

e A

genc

y A

TT

N: F

AC

2A1

(FO

IA)

Was

hing

ton,

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

2030

1· 7

400

111111

111111

11111

11111

11111

111111

111111

11111

11

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

07 4

8 91

rrm

nq

fr>

r tm

m s

ervi

ce la

beO

82

49

9

17

9

PS F

orm

381

1, Ju

ly 2

01

5 P

SN 7

53.0

·02-

00Q

-905

3

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to y

ou.

• A

ttach

thrs

car

d to

the

back

of t

he m

ailp

iece

, or

on

the

front

if

1. A

rticl

e A

ddre

ssed

to:

Uni

ted

:::lta

tes

Dru

g ~nforcement A

dmin

istr

atio

n D

EA

El P

aso

Inte

llig

ence

Cen

ter,

O

ffic

e of

Nat

iona

l Sec

urit

y In

telli

genc

e F

ort B

liss

, Tex

as 7

9918

Att

n: P

rest

on L

. G

rubb

s, P

rinc

ipal

Dep

uty

Adm

inis

trat

or D

EA

El

Pas

o In

tell

igen

ce C

ente

r

llllllllll

llllllllll

lllllllllll

llllllllll

lllll

Q.A

dult

Slgn

a.tur

9 Rest

rictQ

<I D

elive

ry

Adu

ll Slg

Jlat

ule

Adu

lt Sl

gn$J

re R

estri

cted

Delt

ve.ry

C

ertif

ied

Mal

l®

Cer

llfie

d M

all Re$1r!Q~

De!

!VIl!

Y

l 1 .....

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y 2.

Arti

cle

Num

ber (

11an

sfer

from

ser

vice

/abe

9 D

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y Re

strt

~ed D

elive

ry

· ·

n In

sure

d M

all

7 0

1 7

1 0

7 0

0 0

0 0

8 2

4 9

9 2

16

ln

sure

d$50

Mal

l Res

tric

ted

De!

lver

y (o

ver

0)

Off

ice

of N

atio

nal S

ecur

ity

Inte

llig

ence

F

ort B

liss

, Tex

as 7

9918

Att

n: P

rest

on L

. G

rubb

s, P

rinc

ipal

Dep

uty

Adm

inis

trat

or D

EA

El P

aso

Inte

llig

ence

Cen

ter

ga;r

£~ed

111

111111

111111

1111

111111

11111

11111

11111

1111

11

gA~[;g

~Restr

i~Oelw

ery

g~

IJR

etu

mR

ec:

elp

tfo

r j

9590

940

2 29

06 7

094

0745

25

Ce

rtifi

ed

Ma

iiRe

strl

cte

dD

ellv

ery

O

RE

M

erch

andi

se

i o

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y M

D

Sig

natu

re C

ontlr

mat

fOnT

M

? A

rtic

le N

um

be

r (T

rans

fer f

rom

ser

vice

labe

l) D

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y R

estr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

CfS

I· D

Sig

natu

re C

onfir

mat

ion

· \1

1nsu

red

Mal

l D

51

Res

tric

ted

Del

iver

y ~

7 n 1

. 7

1. n

7 n

0 0

0 0

8 2

4 9

8 9

4 3

lnsu

re_d

Mal

l Res

tric

ted

Del

iver

y R<

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

D P

r1or

1ty

Mal

l El!

pres

s®

D A

egls

tere

d M

alf

l"

0 Regi~Jl;d

Mal

t Res

tri~

ed

Oelw

ery

0 Re

turn

R~•for

Mer

chan

dise

·

p S

igna

ture

Con

f1rm

lltfo

n'"'

0 S

igna

ture

Con

firm

atio

n R

estr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

, Jul

y 2

01

5 P

SN 7

530·

02-0

0Q-9

053

• Complet~ it

ems

1, 2

, and

3.

• P

rint y

our n

ame

and

addr

ess

on th

e re

vers

e so

that

we

can

retu

rn th

e ca

rd to

you

. •

Atta

ch t

his

card

to

the

back

of t

he m

ailp

iece

, or

on

the

front

if

1. Ar

t;:q!s

ser;~ t

> r

Jm rr

D

!Je

C"d

) t11

n.t

tK. c.

e'" f

LA

'C. A

q

, t.AJ~Jc:;!J.{;P~~J...J A

V

M-~J

-41,

Pi I~' ~I

111111

11111

111111

111111

111111

111111

111111

11111

95

90 9

403

05

27

51

73

66

79

74

Dom

e

X

B.

D.

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

item

If

YES,

ent

er d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

belo

w

3. S

ervi

ce T

ype

o P

r 0

Adu

lt S

igna

ture

0

RE

~du

lt S

igna

ture

Res

tric

ted

Del

iver

y 0

RE

_.

vert

ifie

d M

ail®

DE

0

Cer

tifie

d M

ail R

estr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

0 R<

f--:

:--:

-7:-

:-::

-:--

:---

;:::

--:-

-:--

----

----

----

~ 0

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y M<

2

. A

rticl

e N

um

be

r iT

rans

fer f

rom

ser

vice

labe

l) 0

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y R

estr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

0 S

l 0

Insu

red

Mai

l 0

Si

70

17

1

07

0

DO

DO

8

25

0

95

57

In

sure

d M

ail R

estr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

R<

(ove

r$50

0)

PS

For

m 3

811,

Jul

y 20

15 P

SN 7

53.0

-02-

000·

9053

D

omes

tic R

etur

n R

ecei

pt

PS

For

m

Dom

e

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to y

ou.

• A

ttach

this

car

d to

the

back

of t

he m

ail p

iece

, o

r on

the

front

if

1. A

rtic

le A

ddre

ssed

to:

Uni

ted

,Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

f th

e A

ir F

orce

H

eadq

{;,a

rter

s U

nite

d S

tate

s A

ir F

orce

Lac

klan

d A

FB,

U.S.

A.~

Inte

llig

ence

, S

urve

illa

nce

and

Rec

onna

issa

nce

San

Ant

onio

, Tex

as 7

8243

Att

n: L

t. G

en. D

avid

A. D

eptu

la,

Dep

uty

Chi

ef o

f Sta

ff

111111

111111

111111

111111

11111

111111

11111

111111

95

90 9

402

2906

709

4 07

46

17

0 Pr

folll

y M

all E

xpre

ss®

a

Reg

iste

red

Mal

l""

0 flegl~ M

all R~t

rlct

ed

Oel

lVG

I}'

a~~tfol'

• C

ompl

ete

Item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to y

ou.

• A

ttach

this

car

d to

the

back

of t

he m

all p

iece

, on

the

front

if s

pace

1.

Art

icle

to

:

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

f Ene

rgy

Ric

k P

erry

, Sec

reta

ry o

fth

e U

.S.

Dep

artm

ent o

f Ene

rgy

Off

ice

of I

ntel

lige

nce

and

Cou

nter

inte

llig

ence

W

ashi

ngto

n, D

istr

ict o

f C

olum

bia

2058

5

Att

n: M

ark

Wes

ley

Men

ezes

, Und

er S

ecre

tary

of E

nerg

y.

111111

111111

111111

11111

111111

111111

111111

11111

==

==

==

==

R

estri

cted

Del

iver

y

cert

ified

Mal

l Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

I I 0

Col

lect

on

Del

lvel

)' N

umbe

r (T

rans

fer f

rom

ser

vice

labe

l) 0

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y Re

sl11c

ted

Del

lvef

Y

1J In

sure

d M

all

a $l

gnai

\Jre

Con

flrm

atlo

nTM

0

Sign

atur

e C

onfir

mat

ion

) I 0

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y 2.

A

rtic

le N

umbe

r rr

ran

sfe

r fr

om

sP

.rvir:

A /

:.hA

ll 0

Col

lect

on

Del

iver

y R

estri

cted

Del

iver

y

3 5

3 3

1su

red

Mal

l

PS

For

m 3

811,

Jul

y 20

15 P

SN 7

53.o

-02-

Q00

-905

3

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r nam

e an

d ad

dres

s on

the

reve

rse

so th

at w

e ca

n re

turn

the

card

to y

ou.

II A

ttach

this

car

d to

the

back

of t

he m

ailp

iece

, or

on

the

front

if

· l

Insu

red

Mal

l Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

Dom

estic

Ret

um R

ecei

pt

7 0

1 7

1 0

D 0

0 D

0 1

0 7

71

1s

ure<

1 M

all R

estri

cted

Del

iver

y

PS F

orm

381

1, J

uly

2015

PSN

753

0-02

-Q00

-905

3

• C

ompl

ete

item

s 1,

2, a

nd 3

. •

Prin

t you

r na

me

and

addr

ess

on th

e re

vers

e so

that

we

can

retu

rn th

e ca

rd to

you

. •

Atta

ch t

his

card

to

the

back

of t

he m

ailp

lece

, or

on

the

front

if

X

B.

Rec

eive

d by

1. A

rtic

le A

ddre

ssed

to

: D

. Is

del

iver

y ad

dres

s di

ffere

nt fr

om it

em 1

? If

YE

S, e

nter

del

iver

y ad

dres

s be

low

: U

nite

d S

tate

s N

atio

nal R

econ

nais

sanc

e O

ffic

e

1.

Art

icle

Add

ress

ed t

o:

D.

Is d

eliv

ery

addr

ess

diffe

rent

from

ite

r If

YES

, en

ter

deliv

ery

add

ress

be

lo~

Nat

iona

l Rec

onna

issa

nce

Off

ice

1 '/6

;S" ~

fl.,P

Cha

ntil

ly,V

irgi

nia

2015

1

Att

n: B

riga

dier

Gen

eral

Mar

k A

. B

aird

, Dep

uty

Dir

NR

O

111111

\lllll

llllll

lllll

llll\l

llllll

llllll

lll\1

95

90 9

402

290

6 70

94 0

7 48

39

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

JI.C

ertlf

led

Mai

l®

0 ce

rtifie

d M

all R

t!lllr

icte

d D

eliv

ery

I I 0 C

olle

ct o

n D

eliv

ery

2 •

. Art

icle

Num

ber

(Tra

nsfe

r fro

m s

ervi

ce la

bel)

0 C

olle

ct o

n D

eliv

ery

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

o In

sure

d M

ail

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Fed

eral

Bu

reau

of I

nves

tiga

tion

C

hris

toph

er W

ray,

Dir

ecto

r o

f th

e F

BI

1,12

5 N

ew Y

ork

Ave

nue

NW

, S

uite

110

50

Was

hing

ton,

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

2053

0-00

01

Att

n: D

irec

tor,

Off

ice

of In

form

atio

n Po

licy

(.].

'-J

g ;:::~~

~r~:ct

~ 111

111111

111111

111111

111111

111111

111111

111111

1 o

Adul

t Sig

natu

re R~

-·cted Deliv

ery

[J~~Recelptfor

9590

94

03

05

27

51

73

66

79

81

g:~:

~~~:

::~est

rlated

Delive

ry M

en:h

andl

se

0 C

olle

ct o

n D

eliv

ery

0 S

igna

ture

Con

finna

tion"

'' 2.

A

rtic

le N

umbe

r (T

rans

fer

fro

m s

ervi

ce ta

beO

0

Col

lect

on

Deliv

ery

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

0 Si

gnat

ure

Con

finna

tlon

-In

sure

d M

ail

'"'"'~d D

eliv

ery

Res

trict

ed D

eliv

ery

7 0

16

0

91

0

0 0

0 0

3 4

21

6

2 5

3 [n

sure

d M

all R

estri

cted

De:

llver

y !tl~

ltt:

Y •v•

a.s• Re

~&..

~~ .. -

·

J. OP

1 O

Ro

DR

• D

o O

R• M

DS

I O

Si

R<

· --

• ....

. '-'

• ...,

u

u u

u o

c; '1

--1

1..1

1 ..11

(

.over

i!>OO

OJ

__

-------

over

$50

0) .

.

..

. ,·

1 PS

For

m 3

811,

Jul

y 20

15 P

SN 7

530-

02-0

00-9

053

Dom

estic

Ret

urn

Rec

eipt

PS

For

m 3

811,

Apr

il 20

15 P

SN

753

0-02

-000

-905

3 ·"

•z,

f)O

!'llfl

United States Department of State Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary ofthe U.S. Department of State AIGISIIPSIPP SA·2, Suite 8100 Washington, District of Columbia 20522·0208


1111111111111 1111111 11 111111111111111111 111111

PS Fonn 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053

• Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse

so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,

or on the front if 1. Article -~tldressed to:

United States Central Intelligence Agen:cy-- ·Gina Haspel, Director of the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator, Washington, District of Columbia 20505

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ~I

0 Priority Mail Expres$® 0 Registered MaiiTM 0 Registered Mail Restricted

DeUve<y 0 Return Receipt for

Merchandise 0 Signature ConflrmationTM 0 Signature Confirmation

Restricted Delivery

Domes~lo.Return Receipt

D. Is delivery address different from item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No

0 Priority Mail Expres$® . 0 Registered MaiiTM 0 Registered Mail Restricted

Oeiive!Y 0 Return Receipt for

Merchandise 0 Signature Confirmatlonll<1 0 Signature Confirmation

Restricted Delivery

Domestic Return Receipt




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 71

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in ease Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: 518-416·8743 email: [email protected]:rg


United States Department of the Air Force m Headquarters United States Air Force Lackland AFB, U.S.A.F. Intelligence, Survei.llan.ce and Reconnaissance 102 Hall Blvd, Ste 234 San Antonio, Texas 78243

Attn~ Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Lackland Air Force Base

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER·EARL: STRUNK {CES): SSN: M II 3 and EIN: 4 Ill liM

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the ''Threat Matrix" Assessment

Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a ~ Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency ''Threat Matrix" A es ment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER·EARL: STRUNK (CES) ,•.rith SSN: ~ ( and EJN: .);, J 1 1g and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing ofthls request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is requb:ed to aid the disclosure pi"ocess; and

Further, in compliance with requirements of this agency please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the 1·espondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledj;!ement lette r; and

Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not. for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the t·equester; and

Further. on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 o.f 12 September 2018 00 , served a copy ofthe Writ ofMandamus CaJon Senior ExecutiVe Service member. DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick (4>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Cryp&o Currency Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions (s) filed in the British Indian Ocean 'ferritories Supreme Court that on

1 http ://www .af.mil/Ahout· Us/Speeches· A.rchiveiDisplayiArticle/143960/tra nsformation ·and· air-force ·intelligence· urveiliant.-e· md·reconnSJ.Ssance/ : bttps://www.fedel·alregister.gov/documents/2018/09/1412018·20203/imposiug·certain·sanctions-in·the·event·of·fureign· mterference·in·a ·united· state ·election

https://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/scotus·ruie·22·3·writ·of-mandamus·uscaaf·tbr·preserve·paper·baUots·l0·29· ;!018.pdf • https:f/www.dhs.govloffice·general·counsel inter alia 1'he General Counsel is the Department's 1·egulatory policy officer, m.ana~mg r.be rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with televant statutes and executive orders.

or about 2 April 2018 are related to the lettet· and intent of the Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 16); and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a. witness to Britain; and

Fm·ther, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11 :48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to caU on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Servke Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, ou Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ. but. there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had on~y b.eeu with the agency tbr 7 months was deployed Wednesday oveJ-sess', and that Affiant must speak with Agent .Jim Cook, who then :refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Setvico despite being chru·acterized by Affiant as an actual national secw"ity threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual" threat t.o Secreta.Jy Ho~meland Security SecreUizy Kli-stjen lYl. Nielsen'' to which Undersigned denif'd as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersjgned is: an attorne.v. in the m1litar..v, owns a weapon a11d or goes bunting .. .? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequ.ivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's tune, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Secw:ities Exchange Commission RegiBtrant{7) CRrd, if Mr. Cook nooded to speak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(l); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:


that tlris option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DlSSEMlNATlNG INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of ubstantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.

VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss. COUNTYOFWARREN)

Accordingly. I, Christopher Ea.rl Strunk, being duly swom, depose and tiay er penalty of perjury under the laws

of the United States of America that the forego~ct~ .


u bttps://www.scribd.contldocumeut/393091608/Cl'YPto·Currency-Resolulion·Trust·v·Bitcoi.n·Blender-Organisatlon·FILE STAMP.ED?ca mpaign ==VigLink&ad_gs:onp=nclxx&sou.rce=bp_affiliate&medi um=affilia Le G https:/fwww. whitehouse. gov/presidential· actions/execu tive·order blockiug·properly·persorud.nvol ved ·serious ·human· rightsabuse ·corraptionf 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHlUSTOPHER EARL S'rRlJ1\'K

Shawn E. Davis

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE TWENTY -FIFTH AIR FORCE (ACC)

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO- LACKLAND TEXAS

25th Air Force Privacy Office 102 Hall Street Suite 104 San Antonio TX 78243-7075

Christopher-Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk

December 11,2018

We received your 27 November 2018, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy request 2019-00004-P via Certified Mail on 7 December 2018, which seeks the following:

Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: :XXX-:XX-XXXX and EIN: 47 6702521

Based on the information you have requested, we placed your request in the Simple processing multi-track. A simple request is one that "can be processed quickly with limited impact on the responding units. The request clearly identifies the records with no (or few) complicating factors involved. There are few or no responsive records. Only one installation is involved and there are no outside OPRs. There are no classified or nongovernment records. No deliberative process/privileged materials are involved. The responsive records contain no (or limited) personal privacy information and do not come from a Privacy Act system of records. No time extensions are anticipated."

We estimate we can provide a response to your request within 20 working days. Our policy is to process requests within their respective tracks in the order in which we receive them. FOIA request are processed as quickly as possible. We will advise you if we cannot provide a response within the FOIA statutory timeline.

The FOIA Fee Restriction prevents DoD Components from charging commercial or "other" requesters search fees, or representatives of the news media or educational requesters duplication fees if respond do not occur within 20 or 30 working days for unusual circumstances (documents not located with the office processing the FOIA request, the responsive records are voluminous, or required consultation with another agency). Fee restrictions do not apply if responsive records total more than 5,000 pages, and this office has made three or more good-faith attempts to discuss with you, how to effectively limit the scope of your request.

We placed you in the "Other" fee category for processing. Under this category, you may be charged for search and duplication (paper) costs. The first two hours of search time and the first 100 pages of duplication are furnished without charge.

Your request for expedited processing is granted. Your case will be moved to the top of the processmg queue.

You may contact the Air Force Privacy Officer, Mr. LaDonne White, concerning this final response at Air Force Privacy Office, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1800 or [email protected] or (571) 256-2515. You may also seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services, and can find information on this Office at https://ogis.archives.gov/mediation-program/reguestassistance.htm. Using the dispute resolution services, will not affect your appeal rights.

Direct questions to [email protected] or ·call210-925-2725 or 210-977-3080 and reference FOIA Privacy case number 2019-00004-P.

Sincerely,

DAVIS.SHAWN.E g~~~~,s~~':,bri..RL10977o349 ARL.1 097703490 g,,. 2o1s.12.1114:32<o-oooo·

SHAWN E. DAVIS, Civ, DAF FOIA & Privacy Manager

2019-00004-P- NO RECORDS

Tue, Jan 8, 2019 4:44pm

From: AFI [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected]

1 Attachments

2019-00004-P-NoRecords1.pdf- (52kB}

Dear Mr. Strunk,

This responds to your 7 December 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy request 2019-00004-P received via Certified Mail on 7 December 2018, which seeks the following:

"Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or

electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States

Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the

name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: XXX-XX-XXXX and EIN: 47 6702521."

A thorough search was conducted at 25th Air Force using search terms: Christopher Earl Strunk and the social security number you provided and no records were located responsive to your request. We, therefore, provide a "No Records" response.

If you disagree and interpret this response as an adverse action, you may write to the Secretary of the Air Force, Thru:

25th Air Force FOIA Office 102 Hall Blvd Suite 104 San Antonio TX 78243 within 90 calendar days from the date of this

letter. Include in the appeal your reasons for reconsideration, and attach a copy of this letter. You may also submit your

appeal on line at the Air Force's Public Access Link: httP-s:/ /www.efoia.af.mil/galMain.asnx .(b.tlP.s://www.efoia.af.mii!QaiMain.asP-25)..

You may contact the Air Force FOIA Public Liaison Officer, Ms. Anh Trinh, concerning this final response at Air Force

FOIA Public Liaison Office, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1800 or usaf._P-entagon.saf-cio-a6.mbx.af

[email protected]/ or (703) 614-8500. You may also seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government

Information Services, and can find information on this Office at httns://ogis.archives.gov/mediation-nrogram/reguest

assistance.htm (httRs://ogis.archives.gov/mediation-Rrogram/reguest-assistance.htm) .. Using the dispute resolution

services, will not affect your appeal rights.

The FOIA provides for the collection of fees based on the costs of processing a FOIA request and your

fee category. In this case, no fees were assessed for processing this request.

Direct questions to [email protected] or call (210) 977-2725, and reference FOIA case

number 2019-00004-P.

Sincerely,

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE TWENTY -FIFTH AIR FORCE (ACC)

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO - LACKLAND TEXAS

--

December 28, 2018

Shawn E. Davis 25th Air Force FOIA/Privacy Office 102 Hall Blvd Suite 1 04A San Antonio TX 78243-7075

Christopher-Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk,

This responds to your 7 December 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy request 2019-00004-P received via Certified Mail on 7 December 2018, which seeks the following:

"Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: XXX-XX-XXXX and EIN: 47 6702521."

A thorough search was conducted at 25th Air Force using search terms: Christopher Earl Strunk and the social security number you provided and no records were located responsive to your request. We, therefore, provide a ''No Records" response.

If you disagree and interpret this response as an adverse action, you may write to. the Secretary of the Air Force. Thru: 25th Air Force FOIA Office 102 Hall Blvd Suite 104 San Antonio TX 78243 within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter. Include in the appeal your reasons for reconsideration, and attach a copy of this letter. You may also submit your appeal on line at the Air Force's Public Access Link: https://www.efoia.af.mil/palMain.aspx.

You may contact the Air Force FOIA Public Liaison Officer, Ms. Anh Trinh, concerning this final response at Air Force FOIA Public Liaison Office, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1800 or [email protected]/ or (703) 614-8500. You may also seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services, and can fmd information on this Office at https://ogis.archives.gov/mediationprogram/request-assistance.htm. Using the dispute resolution services, will not affect your appeal rights.

The FO IA provides for the collection of fees based on the costs of processing a FO IA request and your fee category. In this case, no fees were assessed for processing this request.

Direct questions to [email protected] or call (210) 977-2725, and reference FOLA. case number 2019-00004-P.

~

:>:

~ g .....

CZl

""' ~ ~~

Qt.

) ~<

.~

I=J

u 0 .....

. ~

......

CZl ~

> s

<~

.......

• <+

-< J:i

l 0

~~

< 0

::I:

~

CZ

lj:;l.

,

DE

PA

RTM

EN

T O

F TH

E A

IR F

OR

CE

25 A

F FO

IA O

FFIC

E 10

2 H

ALL

BLV

D S

TE 1

04

SA

N A

NTO

NIO

TX

7824

3 O

FFIC

IAL

BUSI

NES

S

I

\ C

HR

ISTO

PH

ER

EA

RL

STR

UN

K

141

HA

RR

IS A

VE

NU

E

LAK

E LU

ZER

NE

NY

128

46-1

721

-

U.S

.PO

STAG

E»PI

TNEY

BOW

ES

lt~-l'!!! !5

5F'

""ty

.....,

.._...

..iii

iiii

··-~n

~ ZI

P 78

=-$0

00 47

0 ~~

~~-t

1 g5o

ri~532

82 JA

N

04

• 2

0 1

9

:l ::'

2E:h·:

:}t;:~

::'£. i

··?:~

:: t

F:::':

:J:') i

ill

i lli

'Jil

ja! 11

\1\11 \,

Hil

l,\ 1\

)••\•\•

I'III

I}!J

lll \1\

•\1\•I

IIIJI•




-against-Plaintiff,

STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, ANDREA STEWART-COUSINS, CARL E. HEASTIE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WARREN ·'BILL DE BLASIO' WILHELM JR., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITIEE TOM PEREZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC .. and VOICE FOR CHOICE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY ACTION FUND, INC.

Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 72

------------------------------------------------~

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Suijurill 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: tH8·416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States Coast Guard UJ U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Coast Guard Intelligence 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE , #7301 Wash.ington,District of Columbia 20593·7301

Attn: Admiral Charles W. Ray, Assistant Commandant for Intelligence, (CG-2) U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters

Regarding: 5 USC §552a ·Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: - 5! £1§6 and EIN: if 'I 2l


Admiral Charles W. Ra and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a- Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records., used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN"=t;lili U •• and EJN; 1 I I 1 I ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disclosure process: and

Fm-ther, in compliance with requirements of this agency, please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00. unJes granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the t•espondent will confil'm this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for comme1·cial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request fur

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding ofthe operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further. on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <~.served a copy of the Writ ofMandamus Cs>ou Se1rior Executive Service member. DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <4>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Camp lainant Trustee of the C1:vpto Currency Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions (l)i filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

1 https://www.dco.uscg.mi1!0ur·Organization!Intelligence·CG·2/ 2 https://www.federall·egist.Eu·.gov/documents/2018/09114/2018·20203/imposing·certain·sanctions·in·the·eveut·of·fureign· mterference·in·a·unit~ ·states· election 1 h ttJ)s:f/aim 4 truthblog.files.wordpress.com/20 18/1 Ofscotus· rule·22· 3 ·writ·of·m.andam us· uscaaf·for-preserve ·paper· ballots ·1 0·29· ~Ol8.odf • httPa:flwww.dhs.gov/office-general-counseJ inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, !llanalifl.Dg the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with .e.1evant tatutes and executive orders. · ltttos://www .scribd.com/documen t/393091608/Crypto· Currency· Resolution ·'frust·v· Bitcoin -Blender-Organi.sa tion ·FILE :STMfPED?campaign=VigLink&ad_group=xxclxx&so"t+rce:=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate

or about 2 April20l8 are related to the letter and intent of t he Executive Order issued on 21 December 201'7 <Gl; and 1·or wbkh Affiant will be reqwred to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 42'7 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile pho11e 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518-416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday a Novembet 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.'f. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and hound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency lor 7 months was deployed Wednesdaxoverl'teas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook. who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases. was not inte1·ested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterit.ed by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent. Cook stated that he wo1·ks for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual" thnJtlt to Secretary Homeland Security Secretary J(frstjen M M'elsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if : Undersigned is: an attorney. in the military, owns a weapon and or goes hunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time. Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant(?) Ot:n·d. if Mr. Cook needed to speak further, and t hen Affi~tnt shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment a.R it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5<d){l); and that Undersigned request warrants expectitious handling as:


that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORNV\TION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A hann to substantial humarutarian concerns exists.

STATE OFNEWYORK) )SS.

COUNTY OF WARREN )


Accordingly. 1, Christopher Earl St:runk. being duly sworn, depose and say unde ty of perjm·y under the laws

of the United States of Amerioa thnt the foregoing ~rrec~

-Subscribed ru1d Sworn to before me This90__ day of November 2018

//} .,

Not;axy ~8REL~. HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York warren County #01HA6378601

Commission Expires July 30, 2oa1!

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris All Rlght.s Reserved Without Prejudtce

tl htt.ps:lfwww .w hltahottse.gov/presiden tial· actionsJexecuti ve· order· b lockiug·propeny·persons·involved·sarlous· bu man·t·igb ts · abuse·col'!·uptionl 1 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNA

\

--- ···--·- ---··

U.S. Department o~· Homeland Security • ::!!_,) United States Coast Guard

Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

Director Coast Guard Investigative Service

USCG Mail Stop 7305 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. , Ave SE Washington, DC 20593-7305 Staff Symbol: CG-CGIS Phone: 202-372-3039 FAX: 202-372-8336

5720 FOIA 19-CGF0-00841 March 1, 2019

This letter is the final response to your Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request addressed to the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and received by this office on February 22, 2019, to the U.S. Coast Guard, requesting any and all individual personal records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name Christopher-Earl: Strunk ..

Based on the information provided, we have been unable to locate any records responsive to your request. A detailed electronic search of the Coast Guard Investigative Service, Case Management Database System (CMDS) was conducted this date. These records are retrievable by name, case number, social security number, or any word/character. The search was conducted by Mr. Langston Brooks on March 1, 2019 based upon the word "Christopher Strunk" arid "Strunk". After a thorough electronic search ofthis system, we were unable to locate any responsive records relative to your request.

If you need any further assistance or would like to discuss any aspect of your request, please contact our office at 202-372-3039 and refer to FOIA 2019-CGF0-00841. You may also contact our FOIA Public Liaison by sending an email to [email protected], or calling 202-475-3522. Additionally, you have a right to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) which mediates disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. You may contact OGIS as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at [email protected]; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741 -5769.

5720 FOIA 19-CGF0-00841 March 1, 2019

If you are not satisfied with the response to this request, you have the right to appeal. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy ofthis letter, within 90 days of the date of this letter to: Commandant (CG-611), ATTN: FOIA APPEALS, 2703 Martin Luther King Ave. STOP 7710, Washington DC, 20593-7710 and follow the procedures outlined in the DHS regulations at 6 CFR 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked "FOIA Appeal." Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia

L.D. BROOKS FOWPrivacy Act Officer By direction

Copy: Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard (CG-611)

DIRECTOR Hasler \ RD INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE

SCG MAIL STOP 7305 "IN LCTHER KI~G JR. AVE S.E. HL'IGTON, DC 20593-7305

&l~if;liixcn•$000. 50Q US OFFICDU. MAIL

$ JOO "--il)

CHRISTOPHER EARL STRU~K 141 HARRIS AVENUE

LAKE LUZERNE. NY 12486-1721

~~ ~~~Use ZIP20743 • 011E11520040

( I




-against-Plaintiff,

STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, ANDREA STEWART-COUSINS, CARL E. HEASTIE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WARREN ·'BILL DE BLASIO' WILHELM JR. , DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE TOM PEREZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC .. and VOICE FOR CHOICE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY ACTION FUND, INC.

Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 73

Christopher· Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846~1721

· Ph: 518·416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States Department of the Navy (l)

Office of Naval Intelligence, 4251 Suitland Road Waahington,Diatrict of Columbia 20395p5720

Attn: CAPT Danny Noles, Con:u:nander, Office of Naval Intelligence

Regarding: 5 USC §552a • Freedom. of Information Privacy Act Request for 5-.a CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: UJ U UfB andE'!N. iF l t

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" Asses.sm.ent

CAPT Danny Noles, Commander and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC ~552a · Freedom ofinforma.tion Privncy Act Reque!1t for any and aU Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product record$, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK ( CES} with SSN: JIQZ _ 1 __ 53 and EIN: tr F I; and



Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm trus agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contl'ibute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 (2), served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus <alon Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <-t>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff/ Complainant Trustee of the Cl'ypto Currency Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Cou.rt Actions (5> filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

1 https:f/www.dni.gov/index.pbp/foia 2 https:/fwww.federalregiste.r.gov/documents/2018/09114/2018·20203/imposing-certaw·sanctions·in·the·event·of·foreign· mterference-m· a ·united ·states-election

bttp.3://aim4truthblogJilcs.wordpress.com/2018/10/scotus·rule·22·3·writ·of·mandamus·uscaaf·forpreserve·paper·baUots·l0·29· ;Ol8.pdf • btt.Ds;ffwww.dhs.gov/office·general·counsel inter alta The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, ::nana!flng tbe rulema.king program and ensuring that aU Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with ::-eievant. stat.utes and executive orders. 1 https:/lwww.scribd.com/document/39a091608/Czypto·Cun-ency·Resolut.ion·Trust-v-Bitcoin ·Blender·Organisation·FJLE .:TI'AMPED?campaigo=VigLink&ad_group::::xxclxx&sow·ce=hp_afflliate&medium=affiliate

or about. 2 April 2018 are related to the letter and intent of the Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 (G); and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a .message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·4]4·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgencyi and

Further. on Monday 5 November 2018 at u:43 AM E.S.'f. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue wbo was not there. and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany~ New York: and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ. but thete was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7.months was deployed Wednesday oversea$', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service de&-pite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat. Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual'' threat to Secretary Homeland Securi~rt Secretary Kirstie11 AI. Nielstm" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: 8.11 attorney; in the military, owns a weapon ond or goes hu11ting. .. ? To wit m utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Excht1nge Commission RegistrantC7l Cot>d, if Mr. Cook needed to speak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp band and p1·oceeded home,

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as jt meets certain criteria established for instance is similaxly as under DHS r-egulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(l); and that Undet·signed request warrants expeditious handlil1g as:

L An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleg d Federal Government activity exists and


VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK }

) ss. COUNTY OF WAR.REN )

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn. depose and say und r penalty of pet-jury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing i u ;orrect.

Subscribed and Sworn to before me ~!Jl ~ JNovemtr 2018

/ar-M ~.fe-Nota.ry Public

Christopher Earl S In esse Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York INarren County #01HA6378601

-GemFf!issie~ E>:15ires July 30, 26:Jg-G https:/twww. whitehouse. gcov/presidential· actions/executi ve·order·blocking-propel1:y ·pe rsons·in volved ·serious· hum a nn:ights· abuse·corrupt.ionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR erR: 0001763713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STR~1\

FOIA Request DON-NAVY-2019-002178 Submitted

Tue, Dec 18,2018 4:16pm

From: [email protected]


This message is to confirm your request submission to the FOIAonline application: View Reguest

.(httRs://www.foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/Qublic/submissionDetails?trackingNumber=DON-NAVY-2019-

002178&t:-me=reguest) .. Request information is as follows:

• Tracking Number: DON-NAVY-2019-002178

• Requester Name: Christopher Earl Strunk

• Date Submitted: 12/18/2018

• Request Status: Submitted

• Description: Requester submits a request (27 Nov) and an Amendment (30 Nov) citing both FOIA and the Privacy Act,

seeking all records for a US Government "Threat Matrix" related to himself, Christopher Earl Strunk, from January

2008 until 30 November 2018. Requestor includes SSN and Employer Identification Numbers for reference, and cites

contact with the US Secret Service in Albany, NY.

Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE

4251SUITLAND ROAD WASHINGTON, DC 20395

Subj: FOIA Request DON-NAVY-2019-002178

Dear Mr. Strunk:

IN REPLY REFER TO

5720 Ser NOOJ I 727 Dec 19,2018

This is a final response to your two Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act (PA) request and Addendum of27 and 30 November 2018, respectively, addressed to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). Your request was more properly processed as a Privacy Act request, but was nevertheless assigned the above referenced Department of Navy FOIA number. You requested records of the U.S. Government "Threat Matrix" which refers to you, Christopher Earl Strunk, or by your Social Security Number or your Employer Identification Number.

ONI's Records Custodian conducted a search for records within ONI's Operations, Naval Analysis and Information Acquisition Directorates with negative results . You are advised that, other than records pertaining to current employees, ONI does not maintain records on individuals. As such, ONI holds no documents responsive to your request.

If you are unsatisfied with this response, you may contact the Navy FOIA Public Liaison at [email protected] or by telephone at 703-697-0031. Please ensure you have your assigned FOIA number available. Alternatively, you are advised of your right to appeal this determination. To exercise this right refer to the above referenced number and send your appeal and justification to the Judge Advocate General (Code 14), Depruiment of the Navy, Building 33 , Washington Navy Yard, 1322 Patterson Avenue, SE, Suite 3000, Washington, DC 20374-5066. Your appeal must be received by that office within 60 calendar days from the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should accompany your appeal statement and we recommend you label your letter and envelope with the notation "Freedom of Infonnation Act Appeal."

There are no fees associated with processing your request. The Office of Naval Intelligence is the Official Denial Authority for your request. I am your point of contact for this request, and may be reached at 301 -669-1685 or by email a andrew .levi .mil.

FOIA I PA Coordinator By direction

~DEPARTMENT

OF

NA

VY

C

OM

MA

ND

ER

, OFF

ICE

OF

NA

VA

L IN

TELL

IGE

NC

E

4251

SU

ITLA

ND

RO

AD

I WASHI

NG

TO

N, o

.c. 2

03

95

-57

20

OFF

ICA

L B

US

INE

SS

-

.

CH

RIS

TOP

HE

R E

ARL

STR

UN

K

141

HA

RR

IS A

VE

NU

E

LAK

ELU

ZE

RN

E,N

Y12

846




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 74

Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New Yor.k 12846·1721

Ph: 518·416·8743 email: [email protected]

Certified Mail Receipt No.: 7017 10700000 8249 9001

United States Department of the Army W U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Unscom) 8825 Beulah St Ft Belvoi:r,Virgi.nia 22060·5246

Attn: MG Gary W. Johnston. Commander, INSCOM FORT BELVOIR

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: •iK il& OU IJ and EIN: #I Bl i ?.

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" AssesSlllent

MG Gary W. Johnston and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §n52a · Preedom of Information Privncy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from tfanuary 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: I . f I ff and EIN: ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting acces to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information mav be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disclosure process; and

Further, in compliance with :requirements of this agency, please he advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and


Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced whore it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 00, sel'ved a copy of the Writ ofMandamus (Slon Senior Executive Service men1ber. DHS Chief Counsel John Mu·shal Mitnick <4>.

Further. Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee ofthe Clypto Cun'ency Resolution Tl'ustof the Bahamas for several Court Actions WI filed in the British Indian Ocean 'rerritories Supreme Court that on

' https://www.army.millinscollll ! http ://www.federab:egister.gov/documents/2018/09114i2018·20203/imposmg·certain·sanctions·iD·t.he·event·of•forelg:O· kt1terfe1· nce·in· a ·united·states·election • bttps://aim4tnlthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/1 0/scotus·mle·22·3·writ·of·mandamus·uscaaf·forpreserve·pape;~-ballots· l0·2!:l· .!018.pdf ' h.ttps:f/www.dhs.gov/offi.ce·general·counsE'l inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulat01:y policy officer, .:nana~ng the r\llemalring program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with !'€!levant statutes and executive orders. ' https:/twww.scribd.com/documeut/393091608/Crypto·Cunency-Resolution·Trust·v·Bitcoin·Blender·Orgarusation·FILE 'STAMPED?campaign=VigLin.k&ad....group=nclxx&som"Ce=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate

or about 2 April 2018 are related to the lettet· and intent of the Executive Ordel' issued on 21 December 2017 liD: and for which Affiant will be re-quired to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·4 t4·3760 and affiant later t.bat day :retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return ca:U without urgency; and

Fuxther, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 1148AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with AgerJt Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet hlm on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany. New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suit~ :305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies ofthe varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said" that Agent Donahue who bad only been wjth the agency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday overseas'. and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook., who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat. Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersjgned to be an actual ''threat to Sec.retarv Homo/and Security Sec1•etaJ-y Kirstjen Jl,f Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: BJJ attome_r~ in the military. owns 11 weapon and or goes hunting. .. ? '1'o wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocuJly NO! As such after Mr. Cook v.rasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Secm·ities E.xcbange Commission Registraut<7) Card , ifM:r. Cook needed to apeak further, and t.hen Affiant shook 1\fr. Cook's timp baod and proceeded h01:ne.

Furthermore, based upon information a.nd belief Undersigned's request qualifies fox expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5{d){l); and that Undersigned request wanants expeditious handling as:

l. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an ind1vidual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option 1s available only for Affiant is ENGAGit:D IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. · ~~ . An impail'ment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4 . A harm to substantial humanitarian conceJ•ns exists .

VERIFICA'l'ION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss. COUN'l'Y OF WARREN )

Accordingly, I. Christopher Earl Strunk. being duly~ depose and sswu of the United States of America that the foregoin~E cr~

er penalty of perjury undtw t.he laws


Notary Public RACHELA.HAYSLETTE

Notary Public, State of New York I.Jikrren County #01 HA6378601

Commission Expires July 30, 20..d;L

G https:flwww.whitabouse.govfpresidential·actionslexecutive·order·bloclting-property·persons·involved·set'ious·human·nght:S· ahuse·corruptioof 1 S.E.C. EDGAR CI£.: 00017537 J3 COMPANY; CHRISTOPHE.R EARL STRUNK

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELUGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

FREEDOM Of INFORMATION/PRIVACY OFFICE FORT GEORG£ G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-5995

Freedom of Information/ Privacy Office

Mr. Christopher-Earl Strunk 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

DEC 1 2 2018

This responds to your Privacy Act (PA) request of November 27, 2018, and amended PA request of November 30, 2018, for a copies of any written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name Christopher-Earl Strunk. Your requests were received in this office on December 10, 2018.

Since additional time is needed to search for the records, we are unable to comply with the statutory 20-day time limit in processing your request. Therefore, you may consider this delay an administrative denial of your request. You are not required to provide any correspondence regarding this delay as we will continue processing your request. You will receive an additional response upon cqmpletion of our search. Your agreement to waive the statutory time limit does not prejudice your right to appeal any releasability decision after it is made.

This denial is made on behalf of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2, who is the Denial Authority for Army intelligence investigative and security records under the PA. You may appeal this decision to the Secretary of the Army. If you wish to file an appeal, you should forward it to this office. Your appeal must be postmarked no later than 90 calendar days from the date of this letter (excepting Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays). The mailing address is:

Commander U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office 2600 Ernie Pyle Street, Room 3S02B Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-5995

If you have any questions regarding this action, feel free to contact this office at 1-866-548-5651, or email the INSCOM FOIA office at: usarmy.meade.902-mi-grp.mbx.inscom-foia-service[email protected] and refer to case #0268P-19. Please note that you now have the ability to check . the status of your request online via the U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency (RMDA) website: https://www.foia.army.mii/FACTS/CaseStatus.aspx. Please refer to FOIA Control Number: FP-19-005341. You may also seek dispute resolution services by contacting the INSCOM FOIA Public Liaison, Mrs. Joanne Benear at 301-677-7856.

l ::lff:: Director Freedom of Information/Privacy Office

Investigative Records Repository

CO

MM

AN

DE

R

US A

RM

Y I

NTE

LLIG

ENC

E A

ND

SEC

UR

ITY

CO

MM

AN

D

FRE

ED

OM

OF

INFO

RM

AT

ION

/PR

IVA

CY

AC

T O

FFIC

E 26

00 E

RN

IE P

YLE

ST,

RO

OM

350

2-B

FO

RT

GEO

RG

E G

ME

AD

E M

D 2

0755

OFF

ICIA

L BU

SIN

ESS

00

J.:2

64G

$i72

i R

001

TO

BE

OP

EN

ED

BY

AD

DR

ES

SE

E O

NL

Y

MR

CH

RIS

TO

PH

ER

-EA

RL

ST

RU

NK

14

1 H

AR

RIS

AV

EN

UE

L

AK

E L

UZ

ER

NE

N

Y

1284

6-17

21

iul''

'lltlt

hlfll

l•lli'

ul••

•t•l

f' II'

•llllu

lJ••il

• h 'll'

llllll

J

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTfLUGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY OFFICE

Freedom of Information/ Privacy Office

Mr. Christopher-Earl Strunk 141 Harris Avenue

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-5995

Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

Tbis is in further response to your Privacy Act (PA) request of November 27, 2018, ·and supplements our correspondence of December 12, 2018.

To determine the existence of Army intelligence investigative records responsive to your request, checks were made of all relevant U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) holdings. These checks disclosed no Army intelligence investigative records pertaining to your request. Further coordination has been completed with another element of our command and another government agency. This coordination also disclosed no records pertaining to your request.

This no record response is made on behalf of Major General Gary W. Johnston, Commanding, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, who is the Initial Denial Authority in this matter under the FOIA, and the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2, who is the Denial Authority for Army intelligence investigative and security records under the PA. You may appeal this decision to the Secretary of the Army. If you wish to file an appeal, you should forward it to this office. Your appeal must be postmarked no later than 90 calendar days from the date of this letter (excepting Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays). The mailing address is:

Commander U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office (APPEAL) 2600 Ernie Pyle Street, Suite 3S02-B Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-5995

Since you stated you met with a United States Secret Service (USSS) agent, you may wish to contact the USSS who may or may not have the information you are seeking. Should you wish to submit a FOIA/PA request to the USSS, their FOIA/PA team can be contacted at the following address :

Communications Center (FOIA/PA) 245 Murray Lane Building T-5 Washington, D.C. 20223 Fax: 202-406-5586 Email : [email protected]

-2-

If you have any questions regarding this action, feel free to contact this office at 1-866-548-5651, or email the INSCOM FOIA office at: usarmy.meade.902-mi-grp.mbx.inscom-foia-service[email protected] and refer to case #0268F-19. Please note that you now have the ability to check the status of your request online via the U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency (RMDA) website: https://www.foia.army.mii/FACTS/CaseStatus.aspx. Please refer to FOIA Control Number: FP-19-005341. You may also contact the INSCOM FOIA Public Liaison, Mrs. Joanne Benear, for any further assistance and to discuss any aspect of your request at 301-677-7856. Additionally, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at the National Archives and Records Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services.r National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, email at [email protected], telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769.

Sincerely,

~~ael~ Director Freedom of Information/Privacy Office

Investigative Records Repository

,. i I fi"(O

MM

AN

DE

R

US AR

MY

INTELLIG

ENC

E AN

D SEC

UR

ITY CO

MM

AN

D

·;· FR

EEDO

M O

F INFO

RM

ATIO

N/P

RIV

AC

Y AC

T OFFIC

E 2600 ER

NIE PYLE ST, R

OO

M 3S

02-B

FOR

T GEO

RG

E G M

EA

DE

MD

20755 O

FFIC

IAL BUS

INESS

un-rcnl"tC'l:>oorr"':,:::::~ P

EN

ALTY

FOR

PRIVATE U

SE

, $300

' I

:i. 26

45

$ J. 7.7d.

F::c;;o i

~ J i

' J r

I J '

I T

O B

E O

PE

NE

D B

Y A

DD

RE

SS

EE

ON

LY

M

R C

HR

IST

OP

HE

R-E

AR

L S

TR!JN

f< ~ I

141 HA

RR

IS A

VE

LA

KE

LU

ZE

RN

E N

Y 12846-1721

;, .

. l

..

J '

111 'Jl}ju!IJ JflJ 1 rfiu}J:, JIJ 1i JQ lljiJ iJ 1 j tfuJ ,,JiJniiJJi rp1




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 75


Ph: I'H8·416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency <n Robert Cardillo, Director of the National Geospatial·Intelligence Agency 7500 GEOINT Dr Springfield, Virginia 22150

Regarding: 5 USC §552a • Freedom. of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: I ll ltU and EIN: ll Ll

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Reconis used in the ''Threat Matrix" Assessment

Director of the National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records. written and or £>lectronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency w:rhreat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: J:1l' I F. f and EIN: . t£ T ·and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is reql.tired to aid the disclosure process; and

Further, in compliance with requirements ofthls agency, please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Fm:ther. Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement Jetter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use. not for commercial use; and Further. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with thie request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute sjgnificantly to public understanding oft he operation or activities of the government and is not prima1·ily in the commercial inte1•est of the J."equ.ester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 t2>, served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus <a>on Senior Executive Service member, DRS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <4>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Crypto Cul'rency Resolution Trustof the Bahamas for several Court Actions (Sl filed in the British Indian Ocean Tenitories Supreme Court that on

' htt'ps://www .nga .mil/Pages/Default.asp" 2 https:tfwww.fedcralregist.er.gov/doeumenW201810911412018·20203/imposing·cel·t.ain·sanctions·w·the·event·oHonugn· mterference·i.n·a ·u.nited·stat.es·election : https:l/ai.m4truthblog.files.wordpl·ess.com/2018110/ocotus·rule·22·3·writ·of·mandamus·usca.af·for·preaerve·paper·ballots·l0·29· :!018.pdf 1 https:/twww.dhs.gov/offir.e·general-counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, mana~g the rule making pt-ogram and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Securicy regulatoxy actions comply with relevant statutes and executive orders. 1 https://www .scribd .com/document/393091608/Crypto· Currency· Resolution·Trust -v-Bitcoin · Blendfw0rganisa tion ·FILE 5TAMPED?c.ampaign=NigLink&ad_group=xxclxx&source=hp_a.ffiliaw&medium=nffiliate

or about 2 ApriL 2018 arc 1•ela.ted to the letter and intent ofthe Executive Otder issued on 21 Dect>mber 2017 \BJ; and for which Affiant wUl be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743. and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my retum call without urgency· and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not thE:re, and Affiant was instructed to ca.lJ on 6 November. then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Senrice Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "tho.t Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for ?months Wl:ls deployed Wednesday oYei'Seas'. and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to bu an actual" tbrest to Secn:tsry Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjenlltf Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know i£: Undersigned is: an attorm::_y, in the milit81y, own.c; a weapon and or goes bunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Regi trantC7) Ca1·d , if Mr. Cook needed to apeak fut.'ther, aud then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(l}; and that Undersigned 1·equest warrants expeditious handling as:

l. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEl\IIINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


) SS. COUNTYOFWAR.REN)

Accordingly. I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being du.ly sw_o-=...,.. penalty of piHjury under t.he laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is

Christopher Earl Strunk in es e Sui jt.rris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Subscfilied and Sworn to before me

lJ:jJ!JN:il201B Notary Pub;¥/

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York VVarren County #01HA637860'S

Commission Expires July 30, 20£..Q2.

u ht.tps:Jfwww.whitehouse.gov/presidential·actions/execut.ive·orderblocking·property·persons·wvolved·serious·human·rigbts· abuse-cor-ruption/ " S.E.C. EDGAR CU{: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

NGA Final Response Letter and Records {NGA-2019-FOIA-PA-00012)

Fri, Mar 22,2019 7:54am



Cc: [email protected]

1 Attachments

2019-FOIA-PA-00012 Final Response.pdf- (759kB)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

======================================================

Good Morning Mr. Strunk,

Please see the attached documents in response to your request 2019-FOIA-PA-00012. There are no fees associated with

this request.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact us. Thank you for your time and patience.

1 Enclosure

1. 2019-FOIA-PA-00012 NGA Final Response Letter (1 page)

Respectfully,

Ms. Tiffany Richardson

FOIA Specialist I Information Security Specialist

Office of Security, NGA FOIA/PA Requester Service Center

National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency

(571) 557-4141 (571) 558-3165 (fax)

====================================================== Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

NGA-2019-FOIA-PA-00012

Mr. Christopher E. Strunk 141 Harris Ave. Lake Luzerne, NY 12846

7500 GEOINT Drive

Springfield, Virginia 22150

MAR 1 Z 2019

RE: Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request# NGA-2019-FOIAPA-00012

Dear Mr. Strunk:

This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted to the National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency (NGA) dated 27 November 2018, in which you requested: 11Any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: f~llill-1& and EIN: $ ]JFI:t."

Our extensive search of National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency records failed to identify any documents in our files that are responsive to your request.

If you consider this no-record response to be a denial of you request, you may appeal our determination in writing Appeals to this determination should be m?de in writing within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter. In the appeal you should reference FOIA case 2019-FOI-PA-00012, detail your reasons for reconsideration, and include a copy of this letter. Your appeal should be mailed to the National Geospatial-lntelligence Agency, FOIA/Privacy Act Program Office, Mail Stop N22-SISM, 7500 GEOINT Drive, Springfield, VA 22150.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this request, please contact Tiffany Richardson at (571) 557-4141 or via email at [email protected]. Additionally, the NGA FOIA public liaison (571) 557-7729 is available to you for any concerns or disputes you may have related to your FOIA request.

You may also seek information and resolution regarding your request through the Office of Government Information Services at (202) 741-5770 or via email at [email protected].

I I

/ Sin~er7ly ;/ ,. J .

/ < /..y :;l/

t/'i::,IJLZ 7:/

Charles R. Melton, NGA FOIA/PA Program Manager




-against-Plaintiff,

STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, ANDREA STEWART-COUSINS, CARL E. HEASTIE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WARREN ·'BILL DE BLASIO' WILHELM JR., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITIEE TOM PEREZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC .. and VOICE FOR CHOICE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY ACTION FUND, INC.

Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 76




United States Department of the Treasury Cl)

Steven Terner Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury Office of Intelligence and Analysis 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington,Diatrict of Columbia 20220

Attn: Sigal P. Mandelker, Under Secretary fur Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: 1111 • ! h md EIN: 1 L

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threet Matrix" Assessment

Sigal P. Mandelker Under Secretary for 'fen:orism and Financial Intelligence and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary ofthis 5 USC §552a ·Freedom oflnformation Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electl'onically published and or for work product records, used in any .intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment fi·om January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: -5$ibi«S and EIN: -. ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself a an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is requixed to aid the disclosure p1-ocess; and

Furthe1-. in compliance with requirements ofthis agency please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the 1"espondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement Jetter; and

Fm·ther. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclostu·e of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest becattse it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the ope:ration or activities of the guvenunent and is not primarily in tb.e commerciaJ interest ofthe t·equester; and

Furth r, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 (2). se1"Ved a copy of the Writ of Mandamus Ullon Senior Executive Se1·vice member. DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <-'1•

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Cl']lpto Currencv Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions lli) filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

' https:/!boroe.treasury .gov/abouUoffices !! https:lfwww.fedt>rah·egister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018·20203/im posing·certain·sanctions·in·the ·event·qf·fore.tgn · mtmfe renee ·in·a ·uuited ·states· election · httos://aim4truth blog .files. wordpress.com/20 18/10/scotu :s·rule· 22· 3 ·w rit·of·mandamus ·1.tscaaf· fur-preserve -paper· ballots· I 0·29· .!018.J;ldf · ~ttos:t/www.dhs.gov/office·geueral·eounsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulat.ory policy officer, sana !pong the rule making program and ~msuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with :e!evant statutes and executive orders.

b.ttos!//www .scribd. com/documen t/39309 l608/C1ypto· Currency· Resolution· Trost·v· Bitcoin· .Blender-Organisation-FILE STAMPED?cam9a:ign=VigLink&ad._group=nclx:x&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate

Ol' about 2 April2018 are t.>elat:ed tCJ the letter and intent of the Executiv~ Order issued on 21 December 2017 C6>; and fol' which Affiant will be required to tt'8veJ with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Fu.rtbet, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message ou Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11~48 A.M" E.S.T, Affiant called 518 427 0400 t.o speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at l PM at the Secr-et Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305inAlban..v, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 1 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211-2352 carrying copies of the varies court ca.ses and bound Writ, but there was met by Sec.ret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the <'if!enc;r for 7 months was deployed Wednesda;r overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to disc\JSS the Writ or related cases. was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being charactet:ized by Affiant as an actual national ecurity th..rea.t, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that oonsiders Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Secret1:1ry Homelo.nd Secwity SecJ·etaJ:v Kirs~ien kf Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if~ Undersigned is: I!Ulattorney. in the militl:lry, owns a weapona.nd or goes hunting. .. ? To wit i.n utter amazement at uch stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Comntission Registrant<1l Card. if Mr. Cook needed to speak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5{d)(J); and that Undw·signed request warrants expeditious handling as:

I. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that t~ optio11 ia available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING fNFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A hftrm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


) ss. COUNTY OF WA.R.REN )

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly,......,.,.,..__,__ of the United States of America that the fol'egoing ' t.rn

·penalty ofperjw·y under tlle laws

Cbrisropher Earl Strunk in e .se Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Notary Public

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York \JVarren County #01 HA6378601

:::oromjsslon ExPires July 30, 2~ G b ttps:/fwww. whit.ehouae.gov/presiden tia 1-actionsle..xecuti ve-ord.er·blockwg-pt'{)perty-persons·lfi vol ved·serwus·l:tuman ;·ights· abu11e·conuptionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CTIC: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Mr. Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C.

December 19, 2018

RE: 2018-12-046

Email: [email protected]

Dear Mr. Strunk:

This concerns your undated Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) request submitted to the Department of the Treasury. You seek any CES individual personal records used in the Threat Matrix Assessment from January 2008 to the present. In your FOIA request you reference the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and their components; please note that the Department of the Treasury is not a component ofDHS.

Upon review of your request, it is unclear what specific records you seek from Department of the Treasury. Records must be described in reasonably sufficient detail to enable government employees who are familiar with the subject area to locate records without placing an unreasonable burden upon the agency. For this reason§ 1.5(d) of Treasury's FOIA regulations at 31 C.F .R. Part 1, Subpart A require that you describe the records in reasonably sufficient detail to enable employees who are familiar with the subject area of the request to locate the records without placing an unreasonable burden upon the Department. Whenever possible, a request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipients, tirneframe and subject matter of the record.

Please confirm if you are actually interested in Treasury records or DHS records. If you are interested in DHS records, please submit your request to:

U.S. Department ofHomeland Security 245 Murray Lane SW STOP-0655 Washington, D.C. 20528-0655

If you seek Treasury records, please resubmit your request containing a reasonable description of the records you seek which are maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. To learn more about the Department of the Treasury' s mission, please visit our website at https://horne.treasury.gov/. You can also learn more about the mission of Treasury' s bureaus by scrolling down to the bottom on our horne page and clicking on the specific bureau listed on the left of the page.

In order to process your request under the Privacy Act (PA), we require a signed copy of the U.S. Department of Justice Certification of Identity form which is enclosed. Upon receipt of a perfected request, you will be advised as tp the status of your request.

If we do not receive an amended request from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, February 6, 2018, we will assume you are no longer interested in this FOIA request and will consider your request withdrawn. Please be advised that this action is not a denial of your request and will not preclude you from filing other requests in the future.

You may reach me via telephone at 202-622-0930, extension 2; or via email at [email protected]. Please reference the FOIA number at the top of this letter when contacting our office about this request. If you choose to mail your response, please use the following address:

Enclosure

FOIA and Transparency Privacy, Transparency, and Records Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20220

Sincerely,

~p~;v

Cawana Pearson FOIA Case Manager, FOIA and Transparency Privacy, Transparency, and Records (PTR)

2

U.S Department of Justice Certification of Identity

FORM APPROVED OMB NO. II 03-0016 EXPIRES 05/3112020

Privacy Act Statement. In accordance with 28 CFR Section 16.41(d) personal data sufficient to identify the individuals submitting requests by mail under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. Section 552a, is required. The purpose of this solicitation is to ensure that the records of individuals who are the subject of U.S. Department of Justice systems of records are not wrongfully disclosed by the Department. Requests will not be processed if this information is not furnished. False information on this form may subject the requester to criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 and/or 5 U.S.C. Section 552a(i)(3).

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.50 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Suggestions for reducing this burden may be submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Public Use Reports Project (11 03-0016), Washington, DC 20503.

fullN~e~R~~~~ ---------------------------------

Citizenship Status 2 ____________ Social Security Number 3 _ ____________ _

Current Address -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Birth Place of Birth --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

OPTIONAL: Authorization to Release Information to Another Person

This form is also to be completed by a requester who is authorizing information relating to himself or herself to be released to another person.

Further, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552a(b), I authorize the U.S. Department of Justice to release any and all information relating to me to:

Print or Type Name

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the person named above, and I understand that any falsification of this statement is punishable under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment of not more than five years or both, and that requesting or obtaining any record(s) under false pretenses is punishable under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3) by a fine of not more than $5,000.

Signature 4 _ ___ _________________________________ Date _______________________ _ _

I Name of individual who is the subject of the record(s) sought.

2 Individual submitting a request under the Privacy Act of 1974 must be either "a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully

admitted for permanent residence," pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552a(a)(2). Requests will be processed as Freedom oflnformation Act requests pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552, rather than Privacy Act requests, for individuals who are not United States citizens or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

3Providing your social security number is voluntary. You are asked to provide your social security number only to facilitate the

identification of records relating to you. Without your social security number, the Department may be unable to locate any or all records pertaining to you.

4 Signature of individual who is the subject of the record sought.

FORM DOJ-361




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 77

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui ju.ria 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721

Ph: 518·4.16·8743 email: ch:[email protected]


United States Department of Energy {t) Rick Perry, Secretary of Energy Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington,District of Columbia 20585

Attn: Mark Wesley Menezes, Under Secretary of Energy

Regarding: 5 USC § 552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request far CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: •n U iftdi and EIN: •I b


Mark Wesley Menezes Under Secretary ofthe U.S. Department of Energy and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affia11t is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §il52R - Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product recoxds, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: 111 J£ UU a.nd EIN: tO l!l; and


Further, in compliance with requiremente of this agency, please be advised, that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver: and

Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm trus ag1·eement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Furt her. Undersigned is an individual eeking information for personal u e. not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request fm'

disclosute of a record shall be waived or reduced where it ia determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester: and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 (2), served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus <s>on Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Coun.sel John Marshal Mitnick {4)_

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the C.rypto Currency Resolutio11 Trust of the Bahamas for several Court A.ctions tsl filed in the British Indian Ocean Terr:it.ories Supreme Court that on

1 bttps://www.enei'gy.gov/contributorslmark·w·meuezes 2 https://www.fedex·alregister.gov/documentaf2018/09/14/2018·20203/imposing·certaio·sanction>~·m·the·et'eut·of·foreign · :merference ·.in·a ·united ·states·election · bttp ://aim4 truth blog.files. wordpress.com/20 1811 0/scotus·x·u le· 22· 3 ·writ ·of-tn and am us ·uscaaf·for·preset-ve ·paper-ballot.<4·1 0-29 · .!018.pdf

httns://wwv.•.dh .gov/office·general·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department' regulatory policy officer, :nana~ng the ru.lemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with ;etevant. statutes and execut.ive orders.

bttps:/lwww.scribd.com/document/393091608/Crypto·Cu.rrency·Resolution·Trttst-v-Bitcoiu·Blender-Organisation·FILE 3TA.I\1PED'?cam'\)aign=VigLink&ad_gmup=uclxx& ource=hp_affiliate&medium=atliliate

or about 2 April 2018 are related to the letter and intent of the Executive Order isstted on 21 December 2017 f6l; and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue caJled from 518 427 0400 and left a message m1 Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant late1.· that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my .retuxn call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 1 1=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent •rom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent •rom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany. New York: and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at I PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany. New York 122ll-2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for /months was dc.>ployed Wednesday overseaS', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases. was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Secretlll',y Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook \vanted to know if : Undersigned is: an ettorney. in the mih'tary. OR<'lJS a weapon and or goes hunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned' time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant<7J Cru-d, if:r-.11·. Cook needed to speak furthe1', and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment a s it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)W; and that Undersigned request warrant-s expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists a11d

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION, 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.

STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS.

COUNTY OF WARREN )


Accordmgly, J, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly s of the United !:itates of Amenca that the toregomg tr

r penalty of perjury under the laws

Christot>her Earl Strunk in esse Stri juxis All Righta Reserved Without Prejudke

Notary Public RACHELA.HAYSLETTE

Notary Public, State of New York Warren County #01HA6378601 ...

Commission Expires July 30, 20@-

j; https://www. whi tehou.se.gov/presidential · act:tons/execu t1 ve· order blocking·proper ty·persons-invol ved ·serious· hum au· rigb ts· abuse·corruptionf 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPM'Y: CHRISTOPHER EARL STR.UN!\.




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 78

-----~·----------------------------------------------------------

ChriBtopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: 518-416·8743 email: [email protected]

Cenified Mail Receipt No.: 7017 1070 0000 8249 8943

United States Drug Enforcement Administration (l)

DEA El Paso Intelligence Center, Office of National Security Intelligence 11339 Sag Sima St Fort Bliss, Texas 79918

Attn: Preston L. Grubbs, Principal Deputy Administrator DEA El Paso Intelligence Center

Regarding: 5 USC §562a - Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: .'J8! II ._, and EIN: It 3: l


Preston L. Grubbs, Principal Depttty Administrator and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a · Freedom oflnforntation Privacy Act Request fo1· any and all fndividual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and ot· for work product recm•ds, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency ''Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: 7 UOfi and EIN: <IT lJU; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing ofthis request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to a:id the disclosure process; and

Further, in compliance with requirements of this agency, please bo advised that by making this FOIPA request it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver: and

Further. Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and ftu'ther, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this l:'equest for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive OrdHr 13848 of 12 September 2018 (2J. served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus C3>on Senior Executtve Service member. DHS CbiefCoun el John Marshal Mitnick <4>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Cr_vpto Cu.rrenc . .v Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions !5) filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court. that on.

' https://www.dea.gov/intefugenca 2 https:f/www.federalJ;egister.gov/document.w2018/09fl4/2018·20203funposing·certain·sanctions·m·the·event·of·foreigo· mterfereuca·in·a ·uuited·states·election ' bttps :t/aim4truthblog.file~. wordpress.com/20 1811 0/scotus -rule· 22 · 3 ·writ·of-tnandam us ·uscaaf·for·preserve· paper-ballots-1. 0-29· !018.9df • https:l/www.dhs.gov/office·genoral·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, ll!Ula-!!'lng the rulemaking program a11d ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply \\'lth ;·erevant statutes and executive orders. · https:/1,-.,ww .scribd.com/documen t/393091608/Crypto· CtUTency-Resol u tion·Trust-v-Bitcoin-Blender·Organisa tion ·FILE S'l'&"\!PED?campaign=VigLink&ad_group=xxclxx&source=hp_afllliate&medium=affiliate

or about 2 April2018 are related to t.he letter and intent nfthe Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 <al: and for which Affiant will be requited to travel witb a passport a a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent 1~oru Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day re-trieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke w-ith Agent Tom Dona1me who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York:: and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Se.rv:ice Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies ofthe varies court cases and bound Writ. but there was met by Secret Setvice Agent Jim Cook who said" that Agent Donahue who had only been with the age11cy for 7 mo11ths was deployed Wednesday oversel:lS', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized b Affiant as an actual national ecurity threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DRS that considers Undersigned to be an actual" threat to Secret8l:v Homeland Security Secretm;y I&st.Jen Jl!f. Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as a1l absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: an e.t:torney, in the military; owns a weapon lli1d or goes hunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time. Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant!?) Card, ifMr. Cook needed to epeak fw·ther, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for e:x-peclited treatment as it meE'ts certain criteria established for i.nstance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 Q.F.R. & 5.5(d)(l)· and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the pubhc concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED lN DISSEl\IITNATING INFORMATION. 3. Ar1 impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


) ss. COUNTY OF WARREN )

Accordingly. 1. Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly S!!iQl~~ ofthe United Stateli of America that the foregoing· tr

SubscribE<d and Sworn to before me

~ &/: day~ Nov~m~er 2018

} } a.'.J-otary Public

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York. "Warren County #01HA637860i

Commtssion Expires Julv 30, 20 <':1-..:l-

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris . ll Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

a https:J/www. whi t.ebo use.gov/pres.idential·actionslexecutive·order blocking·pl'Operty·persons· involved ·serious· human ·rigb ts · abuse·corruptionl 1 S.E.C. EDGAR Cllt: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

DEA FOIA CASE NUMBER 19-00131-P

Tue, Dec 18,201811:56 am

From: DEA.FOIA


1 Attachments

19·00131-P.pdf- (90kB)

Good morning Mr. Strunk,

Attached, you will find our response to your SARF case number 19-00131-P request. If you have any questions please feel free to contact the GIS Specialist that is listed on your letter or call the mainline 202-307-7596.

Respectfully yours, Ms. Whitley Program Specialist Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Unit (SARF) (desk) 202-353-1212; (fax) 202-307-8556

FOIA/PA Main Phone Line 202-307-7596

CaseNumber: 19-00131-P

Subject: Strunk. Christopher Earl

Vit1 Electronic Mail

Christopher Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721 Email: chrisrii),priYateamericancitizenship.org

Dear Mr. Strunk:

U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration POI/Records Management Section 870 I Morrissette Drive Springfield, Virginia 22152

DEC 1 8 20f8

This letter responds to your Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act request dated November 27.2018, addressed to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Unit. seeking access to information regarding the above subject. Your request was opened and assigned the above case number. Please include this case number in any future correspondence addressed to this office.

After reviev.-·ing your request we conducted a search for responsive records pertaining to you. To search for responsive records, we queried the DEA Investigative Reporting and Filing System (IRFS). fRfS is the system of records that contains all administrative. general and im estigatiYe tiles compiled by DEA for law enforcement purposes. As a result of our query. we are unable to locate any records responsive to your request.

Because no records were identified as being responsive to your request. no fees were assessed. Therefore. adjudicating a fee \\aiver and your request for expedited treatment is considered moot .

With regard to the portion of your request related to a conversation that you had with an employee from the United States Secret Service (USSC). please be advised that DEA does not maintain records such as those that you described . It appears that the records you seek are likely to be maintained by the USSC . Moreover. be advised that under the FOfA. agencies arc not required to conduct a search for records not in the control and custody of that agency. These records would not likely be located in the DEA systems of records. However, you may wish to contact the USSC to request a search of their records pertaining to the subject of your request.

For your information. Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA. Sec 5 U.S.C. ~ 552(c). This response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA. This is a standard notdication that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do. or do not exist.

Case Number: 19-00 131-P Page 2

You may contact our FOIA Public Liaison at 202-307-7596 for any further assistance and to discuss any aspect of your request. Additionally. you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at the National Archives and Records Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they otTer. The contact infonnation for OGIS is as follows: Office of GoYernment Information Services. National Archives and Records Administration. Room 2510. 8601 Adelphi Road. College Park. Maryland 20740-6001: e-mail at [email protected]: telephone at 202-741-5770: toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769.

If you arc not satisfied with my response to this request. you may administratiYely appeal by w-riting to the Director, Ofticc of Information Policy (OIP). United States Department of Justice. Suite 11050. 1425 New York Avenue. NW. Washington, DC 20530-0001. or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIAonline portal by creating an account on the following website: http~: //\,\\''. l'oi:tonl inc . ~o' ·to iaon I in('im:tinnipunl ic /hom~.:. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within 90 days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail. both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal."

If you ha\'e any questions regarding this letter. you may contact the Customer Service Hotline at 202-307-7596.

Sincerely.

~h.uuufl?(f1 c./:._

Katherine L. Myrick. Chief Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Unit FO 1/Records Management Section

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-87 43 chris@privateamericancitizen .org



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 79

Christopher· Ear]: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph: 518·416·8743 email: [email protected]:rg


United States Department of State <.!i Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of the U.S. Department of St.a.te AJGISIIPSIPP SA·2, Suite 8100 Washi.ngton,Dietrict of Columbia .20522"0208


Regarding: 5 USC § 552a - Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK. (CES): SSN: lllf'i? I J and EIN: • lti8WEL

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix'' Assessment

Kellie Robinson, Public Liaison U.S. Department of State and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a · Freedom ofT nfonnation Privacy Act Request for any and aU Individual Personal R-ecords, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: ta LOiiiB and EIN: 1i.liiiitM; and

Affiant under tands that by requesting acces to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in orde1· to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disc1osurt~ process; and

Further. in compliance with requirements of this agency, please be advised that by making this FOTPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not t o exceed $50.00, unles granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement lett et·; and

Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwi e chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the ~overnment and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 (Z}, setved a copy ofthe Writ of Mandamus Mon Senior Executive Serv.i~ member. DRS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <4J.

Furthel', Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Crypto CUl·rencv Resolution Tru.st of the Bahamas for several Court Actions f5} filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

' httpa:l/foia.~tate.gov/Contact/Default.aspx 2 https:t/www .federal register.gov/docuroents/20 18/09/l.V20 18· 20203/im posjng·cert.ain ·sanctions·iu ·the·eveot·of· fore1gn · mterference·in·a·un.ited·stat.es·alection : bttps :tia.im4tru thblog.files. wordpres .com/20 18/1 0/scotus·rule-22· 3 ·writ ·of· man dam us·uscaaf· for-preserve ·paper ballots·! 0· 29· :!Ol8.ptti' ' https:l/www.dhs.gov/office·general·counse1 inter alia The Gene.ral Counsel is the Depart,cnent's regulatory policy officer, managmg the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Depaxtm.ent of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with Yelevant statutes and e.'<ecutive orders. \ h t.tos:/twww .scribd. com/doctUnen.t/393091608/Crypto·Currency· ·Resolution ·Trt:tst·v· Bit.coin · Blender·Organi ation ·FILE STAMPED?ca.m pai.gn='i; igLink&ad_group::;xxc lxx&sou.rce=hp_affiliate&roedium=afflliate

or about 2 April2018 are t•elated t.o the letter and intent of the Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 (6); and for which Affiant will be l'equired to travel with a passport as a witness to Bl·itain; and

Futther, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 O·lOO and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743. and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue ought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there. and Affiant was instructed to call on6 November. then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York: and then

Further, on Wednesda)r 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to t.be Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said 1

' that Agent Donahue who had onl..v been with the Bf!ency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday ovel'sea$', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook. who theu refused to discus the Writ ot• related cases, was not interested in discusoing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook tated that he works for DHS that considel·s Undersigned to be an actual" threat to Secreta1y Homeland Security See1·etary Kirstjen M Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied a an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know u: Undersigned is: an attorney. in the mJ1it.ary; owns a weapon and o1· goes hunting. .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities El<change Commission Registrant<7> C11rd , if Mr. Cook neoded to speak furthel·, and tbeu .t\:ffiaut shook. Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment a it meets certain criteria established tbr instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(1~; and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or pby ical safety of an individuAl exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFOru..'lATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


COUNTY OF WARREN )

VERIFICATION AFFIDA V1T

or the United States of America that the foregoing i u rrect, Accordingly, I, ChristOpher Earl Strunk, being dul£fly sw. • d.epose and sa. y 1 e:r penalty of perjury under the laws

.~e.

Subscribed and Sworn to before me Th.is iiJ_ day f Noveo1 • 2018 ,()

r 'otary Public " RACHELA.HAYSLETTE

Notary Public, State of New York lflfdrren County #01HA8378601

Commission Expires July 30, 20 d..;L


11 http& '-//www. whitehousf!.govfp1-esidenlial·actionslexecu tl ve·urder l>!ocking ·property[Jersons ·invoived ·senous· human· ngh ts· ub11se·corruption/ ~ S.E.C. EDGAR CrK; 000 1'7537 l 3 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRti'NK




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 80

Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui jurie 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721



United States National Security Agency (ll

Paul M. Nakasone, Director of the NSA 9800 Savage Rd. Suite 6272 Ft. George G. Meade,Maryland 20765·6000

Attn: DirectDr, Office of Information Policy

Regarding: 5 USC §652a • F-reedom of Information Privacy A<.'t Request fur CHRISTOPP~R·EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: 111 a 11 and EIN: 41111l .. li!iill ...

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" Asseaament

Director of the Office oflniormation Policy and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a · Fre(;>dom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Per~ona1 Records, V\'l'itten and or electronically published and or for work product records, used lJ1 any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Mat.rix" Assessment from January 200t:s until the present associated with tb.e name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: Niitf lUll and EIN: t j[ ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an indtvidual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional mformation is required to aid the disclosure process: and

Further, in compliance with requirements of this agency, plea e be advi ed that by making this FOIPA reque t, it hall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confu·m this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information fol' personal use. not for t.'Ommercial use; and Fttrther. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection 'Vitb this request fox·

disclosure of a record ahaU be waived or reduced whe1·e it is determined that disclosure is in the puhlic interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner. as a national security matter referencecl by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 {2), served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus ta)on Senior Executive Ser •ice member. DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick (.Y.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Cr,yPto Currencv Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Adton 151 filed in the Bt'it.ish Indian Ocean TeJTitories Supretm.• Court that on

1 ht.rps:flwww. nsa. gov/about/contact·u~;~r :l b t tp, :1/www. federalregister.gov/docuruen tsf20 18/09114120 18· 20203/rmposl!lg·certain ·sa nct.tons·in · the·twen t ·of·foreJ.gll· •merference·i o ·a ·united ·states·election • btrps://aiJn 4truthblog.fi les. wordpress.com/20 18/1 0/scot:us· rule· 22· 3·wi·it·of-tna ndam us·uscaaf· for· preserve ·papet··ballots·l 0·29· ..!018.pdf • h ttp.:t/ww .d.b .govioffice·general·counsel inte.r alia The Ge.ueral Counsel is the Depanmeut'sreguJatory policy officer. :natlaEflllg r.he rul.emak.ing program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with r£nevanr. statutes and executive orders. • bttps:Hwww .scribd.comfdocu.ment/393091608/Crypt.o·Curreocy·Resolution·Trust-v-Bitcoin ·Blender-Organisation ·FILE ::JTAMPED?carnpaign=:VigLink&ad_gl·oup==nclxx& ource==hp_affiliate&mediuru=affiliate

or about 2 April2018 are related to the tettet· and intent of the Exe<.:utive Order issued on ~1 December 20li (GJ; and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passpo1t as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undet·sigued's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further. on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11 :4s AM E.s:r. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donal1ue who was not tbere, and Affiant was instructed t.o call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1. PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 306 in Albany. New York: and then

.Pt1rtber, on Wednesday 7 Novembet• at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but t.here was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said 1' that Agent Donahue who had only been with the ageru:.Y for 7months was deployed Wednesday overseas'. and tbat Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases. was not interested in discussing the Seniot· Executive 'ervice despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated thar he

works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Secretary Homela.nd Security Seaetary Kirst;en .ft1. Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook \Van ted to know if : Under;:;igned i~: an attorney, in the militaryr, owns a weapon and or goes 1Junti11g ... .? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequ.ivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant('l} Card, if Mr. Cook needed to speak fw·ther, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d~(l) ; and that Undersigned request. warrants expeditious handling as:

l. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to infoTm the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity e:xists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. A.n tmpainnent of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm tu substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


COUNTY OF WARREN )

Notary Pub c 'uA· SLE~ RACHEL A. rv-. Y ' t~::

Notary Public, State of New Yoli< vvarren County #01 HA6378601

Commission Expires July 30, 20 d.J-

VERIFICATION AFFIDA v1T

il httpa.://www. white bouse. govfprestdential· actiouslexecuti ve·order blocking-property· person» -involved ·senous· b uman · ngh t.a·

a buse·con-uption/ ' S.E.C. EDGAR CJK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

0

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000

CHRISTOPHER STRUNK 141 HARRIS AVE LAKE LUZERNE NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

FOIA Case: 105948 20 December 2018

This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act (PA) request of 30 November 2018, which was received by the National Security Agency (NSA) FOIA office on 17 December 2018, for "any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES)." Your letter has been assigned Case Number. Please refer to this case number when contacting us about your request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA/PA. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. There are no assessable fees for this request.

Personnel management files are maintained on NSA/CSS affiliates. Therefore, a search of our most comprehensive filing systems which include personnel, security, and training was conducted pursuant to the Privacy Act. Our records do not reflect that you have ever been affiliated with this Agency; thus, no records were located in a search of those filing systems.

To the extent that you are seeking intelligence information on yourself, please be advised that NSA collects and provides intelligence derived from foreign communications to policymakers, military commanders, and law enforcement officials. We do this to help these individuals protect the security of the United States, its allies, and their citizens from threats such as terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, foreign espionage, international organized crime, and other hostile activities. What we are authorized to do, and how we do it, is described in Executive Order 12333. Information about how NSA conducts signals intelligence activities is available on the websites of NSA (www.nsa.gov) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (www.dni.gov).

FOIA Case: 105948

To respond to your request, NSA would have to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence records on you. Were we to do so in your case, we would have to do so forevery other requester. This would enable, for example, a terrorist or other adversary to file a FOIA request with us in order to determine whether he or she was under surveillance or had evaded it. This in turn would allow that individual to better assess whether they could successfully act to damage the national security of the United States. For such reasons, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence or non-existence of the records you requested.

The FOIA exempts several categories of information from disclosure. Its first exemption indicates that it does not apply to matters that are authorized by Executive Order_ to be kept s~cret and propetly classified in tb.e interest of national defense or foreign relations. The fact of the existence or non-existence of intelligence records on any individual, including yourself, is an appropriately classified matter. Paragraph 3.6(a) of Executive Order 13526 ("Classified National Security Information") specifically authorizes this type of response, also known as a Glomar response, to such requests made under the FOIA.

Moreover, the third exemption under the FOIA authorizes the withholding of information specifically protected from disclosure by statute. The fact of the existence or non-existence of records responsive to your request is currently exempted from disclosure by the following statutes: Title 18 U.S. Code 798; Title 50 U.S. Code 3024(i); and Section 6, Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S. Code 3605).

You may appeal this decision. If you decide to appeal, you should do so in the manner outlined below. NSA will endeavor to respond within 20 working days of receiving your appeal, absent any unusual circumstances.

• The appeal must be sent in via U.S. postal mail, fax or electronic delivery (e-mail) and addressed to:

NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road STE 6932 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6932

The facsimile number is (443)479-3612. The appropriate email address to submit an appeal is [email protected].

. ..J!llil ,,.~ FOIA Case: 105948

• It must be postmarked or delivered electronically no later than 90 calendar days of the date of this letter. Decisions not appealed within 90 days will not be addressed.

• Please include the case number provided above. • Please describe with sufficient detail why you believe the denial of

requested information was unwarranted.

You may also contact our FOIA Public Liaison at [email protected] for any further assistance and to discuss any aspect of your request. Additionally, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at the National Archives and Records Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows:

Offiee of Qov€FB.men t- Information-Serviws National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Rd- OGIS College Park, MD 207 40 ogis@nara. gov (877)684-6448 (202)741-5770 Fax (202)741-5769

Sincerely,

JOHN R. CHAPMAN Chief, FOIA/PA Office

NSA Initial Denial Authority

-- - - -··--~- ------------------~

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

DE

FE

NS

E

j' N

AT

ION

AL

SE

CU

RIT

Y A

GE

NC

Y

Fd

RT

GE

OR

GE

G. M

EA

DE

, MA

RY

LA

ND

20

75

5-6

00

0

I S

UIT

E N

UM

BE

R: ll/3 2

OF

FIC

IAL

BU

SIN

ES

S

PE

NA

LT

Y F

OR

PR

IVA

TE

US

E, $

30

0

AN

E:Q

UA

LO

PP

OR

TIJN

rTY

EM

PL

OY

ER

i ~!::E!:=4-E::±: t ·-;:::;;;: i ;'".:;:;::() i

IIHH~~o, U

S P

OS

TA

GE

~M

-~

$000.47f

ZIP

.2C755

--.' •E• 2

f~0214

; I'; i i '/ i JiJ i,iJ; iJJ iii,; i, 11'1' ,i;;;Jii,iiiiJhi''Jii 'Iii t!i~bo

~




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 81




United States Department of Homeland Security U )

Kirstjen M. Nielsen., Secretary of Department of Homeland Secu.rity The Privacy Office, Office of Intelligence and Analysis 245 Mu:rray Lane SW STOP-0655 W ashington,District of Columbia 20528.0655

Attn: Sam Kaplan, Chief Privacy Officer/Chief FOIA Officer The Privacy Office

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: l5 I iiJUI"and EIN: .......

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix" AsseSBillent

Sam I' aplan, Chief Privacy Officer and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a • Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records. written and or electronically published and or for work product records. used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency ''Threat Matrix'1

Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: i 3 I M and EIN: ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is 1-equired to aid the disclosure process; and

Futther, in compliance with requirements ofthis agency, please be advised that by making thls FOIPA reqneAt, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00. unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands the respondent will confu·m this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

l<"'urther, Undersigned is an individual seeking infurma tion for personal use, not fur commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest ofthe requester· and

Further. on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner. as a national secwi.ty matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 00, served a copy of the Writ ofMandamus {S)on Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick (4l_

Fl.:trlher, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the C.rypto Cwrency Resolutio11 'l'rust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions l5J filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

http s://www.dhs.gov/office·Lntelligence·an d ·analysis = bttpa:l/www.federalregister.gov/documentsf2018/09/1412018·20203/im.posing·certain·sanctions·in·the·event·of·foreign · J.lterference-in·a·ttnited·states·election · ~ttos:l/aim4trnthblog.files.wordpress.com12018110/scotus·rule·22·3·writ·of·mandamu ·uscaaf·for·preserve·paper·bailots·l0·29· ~018.pdf

l:lttvs:/twww.dhs.gov/office·general·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's L-egulat.ocy policy officer, znan.aa:mg the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Depru·tment of Homeland SectUity regulatory actions comply with ceievant statutes and executive orders.

or about 2 April 2018 are related tit the letter aud intent of the Executive Order issued oo 21 December 20r (S>; and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Bt'itaio: anc

F11rther. that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 ani left ames age on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with moblH phone 518·416-8743 and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my t'eturn call without urgency; anc

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with A~m Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent 'fom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Sel'Vice Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

F'urthm·, on Wednesday 7 November at l PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies eourt cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said ttthat Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7 mo11ths was deployed Wednesday overseaS', and that Affiant must spealt with Agent Jim Cook, who then -refused to discuss the Writ or t+elated cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to SeCJ·etary Homeland Security SecJ'etm:v Kirst;en 1l1. Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if : Undersigned is: an attorney, in the milita.zy, owns a weapon and or goes hunting: . .? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant(?} Card. if Mr. C-ook neadod to t:~peak further, and theu. Affiant shook lV[r. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home .

.l'"urthennore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for ex-pedited treatment ns it meets certain criteria estabhshed for instance is similarly as under DRS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(l): and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

t. An imminent and ougoing threat. to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is .ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A barm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


COUNTY OF WARREN J

VERIFICATION AFFIDAVl'I'

1\ccordingly , l, Christopher Earl Strunk, being dttly sworn, depose and say under penalty o£ perjury under the Jaw;: of the United States of America tbat the foregoing · correct. "\

\ ot~oes1rupher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris AU Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

" bttps:/fwww.scribd.com/docmnent/393091608/Crypto·Currency·Resolutiou·'l'l'tlsr·v·.Bitcoin· Blender-Ol'gnmsation·FU:E ST AMPED?campaignc= VigLink&ad_group=xxc lxx&souxce=hp_affillate&medium=affiliate 6 bttps:lfwww.whitehouse.gov/presidential·actionslexecutive·order·blocking·property·persons·mvalved·serio\ls·human·rightfi· alJUse·c.:onuptionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 000175371:3 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Department of Homeland Security FOIA 2019-HQF0-00217 Acknowledgment

Fri, Dec 14, 2018 10:06 am



1 Attachments

Ack - NMI Not Reasonably Described. pdf- (109kB)

Good Morning,

Attached is our acknowledgment of your DHS FOIA request. If you need to contact this office again concerning your

request, please provide the DHS reference number. This will enable us to quickly retrieve the information you are seeking

and reduce our response time. This office can be reached at 866-431-0486.

Regards,

DHS Privacy Office

Disclosure & FOIA Program

STOP0655

Department of Homeland Security

245 Murray Drive, SW

Washington, DC 20528-0655

Telephone: 1-866-431-0486 or 202-343-1743

Fax: 202-343-4011

Visit our FOIA website (httR://www.dhs.gov/foia).

December 14, 2018

SENT VIA E-MAIL TO: [email protected]

Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846-1721

Re: 2019-HQF0-00217

Dear Mr. Strunk:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

Homeland Security Privacy Office, Mail Stop 0655

This acknowledges receipt of your Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request to the Department ofHomeland Security (DHS), dated December 12, 2018, and seeking all individual personal records, written and or electronically published, and/or work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES). Your request was received in this office on December 13, 2018.

After careful review of your FOIA request, we determined that your request did not specifically identify the records which you are seeking. Records must be described in reasonably sufficient detail to enable government employees who are familiar with the subject area to locate records without placing an unreasonable burden upon the agency. Furthermore, DHS does not maintain a central index of records about individuals. For these reasons, 6 C.F.R. Part 5 §5.3(b) ofthe DHS FOIA regulations require that you describe the records you are seeking with as much information as possible to ensure that our search can locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. Whenever possible, a request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipients, and subject matter of the records, if known, or the DHS component or office you believe created and/or controls the record. The FOIA does not require an agency to create new records, answer questions posed by requesters, or attempt to interpret a request that does not identify specific records.

Please resubmit your request containing a reasonable description of the records you are seeking. This is not a denial of your request. Upon receipt of a perfected request, you will be advised as to the status of your request. If we do not hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will assume you are no longer interested in this FOIA request, and the case will be administratively closed.

Your request has been assigned reference number 2019-HQF0-00217. Please refer to this identifier in any future correspondence. The status of your FOIA request is now available online and can be accessed at: https://www.dhs.gov/foia-status, by using this FOIA request number.

Status information is updated daily. Alternatively, you can download the DHS eFOIA Mobile App, the free app is available for all Apple and Android devices. With the DHS eFOIA Mobile App, you can submit FOIA requests or check the status of requests, access all of the content on the FOIA website, and receive updates anyplace, anytime.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter, please feel free to contact this office at 1-866-4 31-0486 or at 202-34 3-17 4 3.

Sincerely,

c~ J~ VM.L ~~ --1.

James Holzer FOIA Program Specialist

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 ch ris@privateamericancitizen .org



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 82

Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne. New York 12846·1721 Ph~ 518·416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States Defense Intelligence Agency o> Lieutenant General Robert P. Ashley, Jr .• USA, Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency ATTN: FAC2Al (FOIA) 7 400 Pentagon Wasbington,District of Columbia 20301·7400

Attn: Suzanne L. White, Deputy D~tor

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: ldl"d ?SE and EIN: 4T F Sl

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Recorda used :in the "Threat Matrix'1 Assessment

Suzanne L. White Deputy Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a ·Freedom oflnformation Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records. used in any intelligence and ot· United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER·EAI~L: STRU?\TK <CESJ with SSN: Jll J lilt and EIN: 4IIJI_&ftit; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in orde.r to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the discl.osure process; and



Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial Hse: and FtLrther, Undersigned reque ts the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced whe.:re it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation Ol' activities of the govemment and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 00, served a copy ofthe Writ of Mandamus <a>on Senior Executive Service member, DHS ChiefCounse1 John Marshal .Mitnick (4).

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Crypto Currency Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions <5 filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

b ttp:l/www.dia.mil .: https://www .federah-egistet·.gov/documents/2018/09/14/20 18·20203/im-posi.ng·certain ·sanctions-ill·the·even t·of·fol'eignmterference·in·a ·united ·states· election · bttps:f/aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/scotus·ru!e·22·3-\\·rit·ohnandamus·uscaaf·forpresetve·paperballot ·10·29· ~018.1;Jdf • !ltms:IIV~>>vw.dhs.gov/office·general·counsel inter alia The GeneraJ CoullSel is the Department's regulatoxy policy officer, managtng we rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security regulato1·y actions comply with ~tevaot statutes and &.'tecutive m:ders.

or about 2 April 2018 are related to the letter and intent of the Executive Otder issued on 21 December 2017 (S}; and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain: and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·874.'3, and wherein message Agent Tom Donabue sought my return call without ul'gency; and

Further. on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agt>nt Tom Donahue who was not there, and .Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, t.hen spoke with Agont '11om Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevat'd Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the vat'ies court cases and hound Writ. hut there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said ''that A;.rent Donahue who had only been with the agency fo1· '1 months was deployed Wednesday overseas', £:U1d that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not inte1•ested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being chaxacterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat. Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Sec.retsry Homeland Secw•ity Secretary Kirstjen M Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if : Undersigned is: an attornex, in th~ militar,Y: owns a weapon ar1d OJ' goes bunting: .. ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequjvocally NO! A$ such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time. Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant(?) Card. if Mr. Cook needed to apeak further . and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Fut·thennore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's ·request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established fot instance i similarly as under DRS regulations. See 6 C.F .R. § 5.5(d)(l); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditiou handling as:

l. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physjcal safety of an individual existo 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity e:Osts and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED lN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of subatantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A hnrm to substantial humanitarian concerns e:rists .


) ss. COUl'·ITY OF WARREN l

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk. being duly swor of the United States of America that the foregoing i

Christopher Earl Str in esse Sui juria All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA. HtlVS~ETTE Notary Public, Stare:= ;), New Vorl< VVarren County 'if.f. 11-'A6378601

Commiwon Ext-·i• ss July 301 20.aJ:-

1i h ttps:/fwww .scribd.com/docu m.ent/393091608/Gr}-pto· Currency· Resolution ·Trust·v-Bitcoin· Bien de r·Organisatinn ·FILE STAMPED?eampalgll=VigLink&ad_g:rQuJr=xxclxx&!:~oul'ce::=hp_affiliate&medium=atl'iliate a https://www.white.b.ouse.gov/preaideutia!·actions/executive·order·block.iog·properr.y-pet'SOns·involved·.serious·human·rigbts· abus~·cot-ruptionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR em: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL S'l'RUNK

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20340-5100

U-l8-2154/FAC-2Al (FOIA)

Mr. Christopher Strunk 141 Harris Ave. Lake Luzerne, NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Sirunk:

DEC 2 0 2018

This responds to your request under the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act dated November 27, 2018. Therein you requested copies of all files, correspondence, or other records concerning yourself.

Based on the information contained in your request, the Defense Intelligence Agency searched its systems of records for any responsive documents. Despite a thorough search, no documents responsive to your request were found.

If you believe this Agency should have records responsive to your request, you may exercise your right to appeal this action. Your appeal should include justifica~ion to support additional search efforts and must be postmarked no later than 60 days after the date of this letter. Please refer to case number PA-0032-20 19 and address your appeal to:

Defense Intelligence Agency 7400 Pentagon ATTN: FAC-2Al (FOIA) Washington, D.C. 20301 -7400

l ' ,.

'I

/JlCtt,.;:~ (/~~-Brian L. Jenkins Chief Records Management and Information Services

·~

.. ~ , , < • .. .

' '• t

" .:

/

DE

PA

RT

ME

Nf

OF

DE

FE

NS

E

DE

FEN

SE

IN

TELL

IGE

NC

E A

GE

NC

Y

WA

SH

ING

TON

, D

.C.

2034

0

OF

FIC

IAL

BU

SIN

ES

S

PE

NA

LTY

FO

R

PR

IVA

TE

US

E,

$300

Mr.

Ch

rist

op

he

r S

tru

nk

14

1 H

arr

is A

ve.

1111

11

00

PO

ST

AG

E

AN

O

FEE

S P

AID

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T O

F D

EF

EN

SE

(X

)D-a

QIJ

I J La

ke L

uze

rne

, f\i

Y 12

846-

172:

;_

:L :~;:

:r::~:

::i.E:

::s :t

·-;:::;;

;: :L .

. r-:;:c:

c: 1.

:.·•·IJ·-:tl'f

1/JJd

.Jrl:::

::

~ t

it'L

"''ii

i/' •

j'•l' •

J'iJ1ii

"I' ,

.jj ,

j ;•,•i 1•;

;1• i

!;;;

;/ d

!1~1 1

i ;~

1'; l~'

~ i 1 J

' 1 il

.. ,

.

. U

-t ·"

.

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

U-19-4500/FAC-2A1 (FOIA)

Mr. Christopher Earl Strunk 141 Harris Ave. Lake Luzerne, NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

WASHINGTON, D.C . 20340-5100

MAR 01 2019

This is an interim response to your Privacy Act (PA) request, dated November JO, 2018, for all records the agency may have concerning all individual personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with name Christopher Earl Strunk (CES). We received your request on February 28, 2019 and assigned it case number PA-0068-20 19. Please use this number in all future correspondence with us about this matter.

We will be unable to respond to your request within 30 days due to unusual circumstances. These unusual circumstances are: (a) the need to search for and collect records from a facility geographically separated from this office; (b) the potential volume of records responsive to your request; and (c) the need to consult with multiple offices within the agency.

For these reasons, your request has been placed in our queue and will be worked in the order the request was received. Our current administrative workload is in excess of 73 requests.

We regret that there is currently a substantial delay in processing requests and solicit your patience and understanding. We assure you that we will process your request as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact the DIA FOIA Requester Service Center at 301-394-5587.

Services

DE

PA

RTM

EN

T OF D

EFE

NS

E

DE

FE

NS

E IN

TE

LLIGE

NC

E A

GE

NC

Y

WA

SH

ING

TO

N, D

.C. 20340

OF

FIC

IAL B

US

INE

SS

P

EN

ALT

Y FO

R

PR

IVA

TE

US

E, $

300

,. i

C;'\P

DIS

TR

ICT

}lll!I0-2:.0.'1

·.£."~~ Ml\R

';1.:9 F~i ,2 t

Mr. C

hristo

ph

er Ea

rl Stru

nk

141 Ha

rris Ave

.

Lake Luzerne, N

Y

12

84

6-1

72

1

I IIIII (~1

~

PO

ST

AG

E

AN

D

FEE

S

PA

lO

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

DE

FEN

SE

O

OD

-306

j_ :;::: Ei:h:~. !::: ~-·· :t ·-;:: :;~:: :~. :::~ :L

li ,j ·I,;' •i II;! ij i'; j II! 'II i1 H

d! I lli I i lli' j j ,, ,j Ji i' ii IIi IJ i·"




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 83

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846~1721

.Ph: 518-416-8743 email: [email protected]


United States Central Intelligence Agency (IJ

Gina Haspel, Director of the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator, Washington,Diatrict of Columbia 20505

Attn: Information and Privacy Coordinator

Regarding: 5 USC §552a ·Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: 1 B S '!Pand EINnot R It


Information and Privacy Coordinator and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a ·Freedom of lnfo1·mation Privacy Act Request for any and ali Individual Personal Records. written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" As!-lessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: JG 3 lnt and EIN: 1&!151 t · and


Furd1e1'. in compliance with 1·equirements ofthis agency, please be advised that by making this FOlPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00. un[ess granted a fee waiver; and

Further. Undersigned understands the respondent \\Till confu·m this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use. not fbr commercial use; and Further. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this xequeRt for

disclosure of a reco1·d shall be waived or redured where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester; and

Fuxther .. on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <2l, served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus {Slon Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick C4>.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Crypto Currency Resolution Trustof thC:> Bahamas for several Court Actions <5) filed in the British Indian Ocean Territorie Supreme Court tbat on

1 h t tps://www .cia.gov/Jjbrary/readingroomlfuia_request 2 https://www.federalregister.gov/docttment.s/2018/09114/2018·20203/imposing·certain·sanctions·in·the·event·o£·foreign· wterf&.rence·in·a·united·states·elaction

httns://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018110/scotus·rule·22·3·writ·of·mandamus-uscaaf·for-preserve·paper.·baliots·l0·29· .!018.pdf • 'lttps:flwww.dhs.gov/ofti.ee·general-counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's 1·eguJatory policy officer. :nanae111g the 1·ulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Secut'ity regulatory actions comply with :eievant statutes and executive orders.

!lttys://www .scribd. com/documen t/393091608/Crypto·Cuneucy· Resolution ·Ttust·v· Bitcoin · Blender·Orga nisation ·FILE STAMPED?campaign.::::VigLink&ad_group=uclxx&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate

or about 2 April2018 are related to the letter and mtent of the Executive Order iosued on 21 December 2011 {o); and for which .Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain: and

Further. that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Sec1·et Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414'3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without utgencyi and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, andAffi~u1t was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the S{'ctet Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite :305 in Albany. New York; and then

Fu.rther, on WedueRday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secr~t Service Office at '7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211-2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then 1·efused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested :i.u discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being cha1·acterized by Affiant as an actuaJ national seclllity thr-eat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Secretary Homeland Security Seuetfl.ry f(irstjen M Nielsen" to whtc:h Undersigned denied as an absurdity: and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: nn ottOJ'JJe,.V, in the military, owns n weapon and or goes hunting ... J To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time. Affiant gave Mr. Cook a P.ersonal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant<?> Card. if Mr. Conk needed to speak furthe1·, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned 's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established !or instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(IJ; and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Governmeut activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. a. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.



Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly >~worn, depose and say u of the United States of America that the iol'egoin b correct.

Subscribed and Sworn to bef01·e me Thi"' 0~ day o 4 ·ovember 2018

Christopher Earl Strun.k in esse Sui juris AU Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York Warren County #01HA637660J. _

Commission Expires July 30. 20 i&:t-

c bt.tps:/fv.rww.wh.itehouse.govfpreside:ntJal·actiom>l/executive·ol'der·bloc;king·property·persona-involved·serious·hum.an·nght.s· abuse ·c:-on•n ption/ 7 S.KC. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRlSTOPHER EARL STRUNK

1 February 2019

Christopher E. Strunk 141 Harris A venue Lake Luzerne, NY 12846-1721

Reference: P-2019-00090

Dear Mr. Strunk:

Central Intelligence Agency

Washington, D.C. 20505

This is a final response to your 30 November 2018 Privacy Act (PA) request for records pertaining to yourself. We processed your request in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, and the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, as amended.

After conducting a search reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents, we did not locate any responsive records that would reveal an openly acknowledged affiliation with the CIA.

To the extent your request also seeks records that would reveal a classified association between the CIA and yourself, we can neither confirm nor deny having such records, pursuant to Section 3.6(a) of Executive Order 13526, as amended. If a classified association between you and the CIA were to exist, records revealing such a relationship would be properly classified and require continued safeguards against unauthorized disclosure. You may consider this finding a denial of this portion of your request pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3) and PA exemptions (j)(l) and (k)(1). Exemption (b )(3) pertains to information exempt from disclosure by statute. In this case, the relevant statutes are Section 6 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949,50 U.S.C. § 3507, as amended, and Section 102A(i)(l) of the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S .C. § 3024(i)(1), as amended. I have enclosed an explanation of exemptions for your reference and retention.

As the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator, I am the CIA official responsible for informing you of these determinations. You may administratively appeal either finding, either singly or in combination, to the Agency Release Panel, in my care, within 90 days from the date of this letter. Please include the basis of your appeal.

If you have any questions regarding our response, you may contact us at:

Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Information and Privacy Coordinator 703-613-3007 (Fax)

Please be advised that you may seek dispute resolution services from the CIA's FOIA Public Liaison or from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) of the National Archives and Records Administration. OGIS offers mediation services to help resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies. You may reach CIA's FOIA Public Liaison at:

703-613-1287 (FOIA Hotline)

The contact information for OGIS is:

Office of Government Information Services National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS College Park, MD 207 40-6001 202-741-5770 877-864-6448 202-741-5769 (fax) ogis@ nara. gov

Contacting the CIA's FOIA Public Liaison or OGIS does not affect your right to pursue an administrative appeal.

Sincerely,

Allison Fong Information and Privacy Coordinator

Enclosure

t. •:"'"" .

Central Intelligence Coordinator ·' ~ Information & Privacy Coordinator : '· washington, DC 20505

~0

rr:c

'

c

\

Chri,stopher E. Sttunk 141 Harris Avenue

lake luzerne, NY 12846-1721

:t :2:E14E:,·- :i "?:2 ~ '~ 1

\'11 •• 1.-t'> .. ]t .'f, .:t ·~ ~ i)t~·\ .... ·· . .,t>~

V..~'k~~;)l)

OS FEe. ··:I~?> .P~~<i.·6.ft

J/ldiJI,/11 ........ . 111

I

I I

- - --_-_ .----_::_-_ - - :-----===::..;;:;:;;;.::___

Explanation of Exemptions Under the Freedom of Information Act

(b)(1) exempts from disclosure information currently and properly classified, pursuant to an Executive Order;

(b )(2) exempts from disclosure information which pertains solely to the intemal persmmel rules and practices of the Agency;

(b)(3) exempts from disclosure information that another federal statute protects, provided that the other federal statute either requires that the matters be withheld, or establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to patiicular types of matters to be withheld. The (b)(3) statutes upon which the CIA relies include, but are not limited to, the CIA Act of 1949;

(b)( 4) exempts from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is obtained from a person and that is privileged or confidential;

(b)(5) exempts fi_-om disclosure inter-and intra-agency memoranda or letters that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency;

(b)(6) exempts from disclosure infonnation from personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy;

(b )(7) exempts from disclosure infonnation compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that the production of the infom1ation (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings; (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication; (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute .an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source or, in the case of infonnation compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, infom1ation furnished by a confidential source ; (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement

· investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger any individual's life or physical safety;

(b )(8) exempts from disclosure information contained in reports or related to examination, operating, or conditi-on reports prepared by, or on behalf of, or for use of an agency responsible for regulating or supervising financial institutions; and

(b )(9) exempts from disclosure geological and geophysical infonnation and data, including maps, concerning wells.

Explanation of Exemptions Under the Privacy Act

(d)(S) exempts from disclosure information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding;

(j)(l) exempts from disclosure cet1ain information maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency;

U)(2) exempts fi:om disclosure certain infonnation maintained by law enforcement agencies;

(k)(l) exempts fi·om disclosure information properly classified, pursuant to an Executive Order;

(k)(2) exempts from disclosure material compiled for criminal investigative law enforcement purposes, by non-principal function criminal law enforcement entities and material compiled for other investigative law enforcement purposes, by any agency;

(k)(3) exempts from disclosure information pertaining to the protective services afforded the President of the United States and others;

(k)(4) exempts from disclosure information that statutes require to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;

(k)(5) exempts from disclosure investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal civilian employment, or access to classified information, but only to the extent the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of a confidential source who furnished information after the govemment's express promise to keep that source's identity confidential;

(k)(6) exempts from disclosure testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service, the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process; and

(k)(7) exempts from disclosure evaluation material the armed forces use to determine an individual's potential for promotion, but only if disclosure would reveal the identity of a source who fumished infonnation after the government's express promise to keep that source's identity confidential.




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 84


Ph: 518-416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States Department of State cu Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State Bureau of intelligence and Research 90 Pa:rkAve New York, New York 10016 1\0fficen Re~arding: 5 USC §552a • Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for

CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: lJ 7 i?U andEIN: 4 f Ull Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Recorda used in the '1Threat Matrix" Assessment

«directorn and To whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a · Freedom oflnformation Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Recm·ds, written and or electronically published and or for work product rec01'Cls, used in any intelligence and m· Unitf'd States Government ngency 11Tbreat Matrix" Assessment from Janu~uy 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER·EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: M 3 W and EIN: .£ a; and

Affiant under tands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disclosure process ; and

Ftttther, in compliance with requirements of t his agency, please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and


Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for per anal use, 11ot for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned request the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

di closure of a record shall be wruved or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it i likely to contri.bute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester· and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 {2), served a copy of the Writ ofMandamus \3)on Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick l4>.

Fut:ther, Undersigned is the Plaintiff i Complainant Trustee of the Cr.,vpto Curnmcy Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions ~ 6> filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

: <<websu:e>• 2 b ltps:/lwww .federalregister .gov/docnment:s/20 18/09/14120 18· 2020::1/im posing··eertain ·sanctions ·in· the ·event ·of-foreJ.gn · !nterfereuce·in·a·united·st.ates·election ' https:flaim4 tru thblog .files. wordpress.com/20 18/l 0/scotu s ·rule· 22 ·3·writ· of· mandamus ·uscaa f· for·preserve·paper baJlot£1·1 0·29· -018.odf · htt.y)s:t/www.dhs.gov/office·generahounsel inter alia The Geue1·al Counsel is th Department's regulatory policy officer . .Dana~rmg rhe rulemaking prognun and enst1ri.ng that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with :e.ievant statutes and e.xecutive orde1·s. · '.lttps:/Jwww .scribd .comldocument/393091608/Ceypto· Cun-ency· Resolut1ou ·Trust-v-Bitcoio · Blende r·Ol'ganisatiou ·FILE STAMPED?camoaign=VigLink&ad_group==x.'l:cl:u&source=hp_affiliate&medium;::affiliate

-----------------------------------------------------------

or about 2 April 2018 arc related to the letter and intent of the Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 f()): and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message oo Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743. and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency: and

Further. on Monday 5 Novembel' 2018 at 11=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak w.ith Agent .,..om Donahue who was not there. and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November. then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods .Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 canying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said n that Agent .Donabue who had only heen witl1 the ag.,:mcy fol' 7 months was deployed WednesdBy overseas', and tha.t Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook. who then refused to discuss the Writ or rel-ated cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Execut1ve Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national secu1-ity threat. Agent. Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "thl'eat to Secreta.J.:t-• Homeland Security Secretar ' Kirstfen M. Nielsen' to wbjch Undersigned denied as an absurdity: and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned :is: an attorney, in the militm:v. owns a weapon and or goes hunting. .. ? To wit jn utter amazement at such stuptdity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securitie Exchange Commission Registrant<?> Card, if Mr. Cook needed. t.o speak further and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand alld proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for expedited.n-eaunem as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5{d.)(J); and that Undersigned request wat"rants expeditious handling as:

1. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or phy ical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only fo.r Affiant ia ENGAGED JN DISSEMINATING INFORMA'riON. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.


} ss. COUN'I"l OF WA.RREN )

Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk. being duly sworn, depose and say er penalty of pe1jury u.ndel' the laws of the tlnited Stares of America that tbe foregoing · d comctc:3 ~

pher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA.HAY~.:¥-e Notary Public. Stait> > ,... :: • Yori< Wmen County #t: 1 hJ.~ .1• ' 3801

Commission b .;_.,,.es ..i•J iy •· , 20u

6 https://www.whilehousa . gov/presideutial ·actions!execltrive·order-block.ing-property-pel'Sons·Ulvolved·se.rious.·hum:~n·rigbts· abuse·corruptionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPA..W: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 chris@privateamericancitizen. org



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 85

Christopher Earl: Strunk ill esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721



United States National Reconnaissance Office (l)

National Reconnaissance Office 14675 Lee Rd Chantilly,Virgi.nia 20151

Attn: Brigadier General Mark A. Baird, Deputy Director of the NRO

Regarding: 6 USC §552a • Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: t ' 0816 and ElN: 11 5 t;JJ£1

Subject : ANY CES Individual Personal Records used in the "Threat Matrix'' Assessment

Brigadier General Mark A, Baird and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary ofth.is 5 USC §552a , Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and o1· for wor·k product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) withSSN: G · A and EIN: 4 R&- t ; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to t-ecords about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is required to aid the disclosure process· and

Further, in compliance with requirements of this agency . please be advi,::ed that by making this F'OIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00. unless granted a fee waiver; and

Fm·ther, Undersigned understands the respondent will confirm tllis agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use. not for commercial use; and Further. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or .reduced where it is determined that disclosure 1s in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of tbe operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the comme:rcial interest of the requester; and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner. as a national security matter .referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <2), served a copy ofthe Writ of Mandamus <s>on Senior Exe.cutive Service member, DRS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick (<1l,

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff/ Complainant 'Trustee of the Cr . .vpto Currenc..v Resolutio11 Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions <5) filed in the British Indian Ocea.n Territories Supreme C-ourt that on

1 http:/fwww.nro.gov/Freedom·of·Infurm.ation·Act·FOIAI 2 ht.tps:t/www.federalt·egister.gov/documents/2018/0911412018·20203/imposing·certaiu·sanctions·in·tbe·evenl·of·foreign · mrerferenre·in·a·united·stat.es·election ; h ttos:!/aim 4 tl'uthblog . .flles. wordpress.com/20 1811 0/scotus ·1·ule· 22· 3 ·writ ·of·wandanms· uscaaHor-pre.:~e.rve ·paper ballots·l O· 2.9· .!018.l)df , httos:/fwww .dhs.gov/office·general·counsel inter alia The General Counsel 1s the Department's regulatory policy officer, .:nana<Onng the rulemaking program ancl ensuring that all Department of Homeland SecUJity regulatory actions comply with :-e.~evant statutes and e.'f.ecutive orders.

!!ttps://www .scribd.com/documen t/393091608/Crypto· Currency· Reso1 uti on ·Trusty Bit coin· BlenderOrganisa tion ·FILE '>TAMPED?cnmpaign=VigLink&ad_group=x.xclxx&source=hp_aftiliate&medium=atliliate

ot· about 2 April2018 are related to the leLter and intent of the Executive Order issued on :2l December 20li (6); and for-which A.ffi.ant will he required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, tha.t on 2 November 2018 U .S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 4.27 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant latf:'r that day retrieved with mobil(! phone 618·416·8743, and wbereifi message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Further, on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11:48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donabue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instt:uctions to meet him on Wedne~day at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Wood Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Furthel:', on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods BJvd Suite 305 ill Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ. but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said" that Agent Donohue who had only been with the agency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "threat to Secretary Homeland Secur:ity Secretory Kfrstj(m M Nielsert' to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: a.n attorney, in the mjJit..ary, ows a weapon a.12d OJ' goes hunting ... ? To wit in uttex· amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Cat·d and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant<7} Card, if Mr. Cook needed to speak further . und then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies for eX}!edited h-eatment as it meets certain criteria established f01· instance is similarly as under DHS t•egulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.6(d)(l); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

I. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists aod

that th1s option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.

VERIFICATION AFFIDA VlT STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss. COUNTY OF W A.RREN )

Accordingly, 1, Christopher Earl Strurik, being duly sworn, depose and say er penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Stat.es of America that the foregoing is

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sut jm•is All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA.HAYSLETTE Notary Public. State of New York VVarren C01.1nty #0 1HA6378601

Commission Expires July 30, 20 d :;t

G https://www.whitehouse.govlptesidential·actiousJexecut.ive·orderblock.ing-propet'ty·persous·tuvolved·serioutl·hUJllan-rights· ll buse ·corrupt.ioDJ 7 S.E.C. EDGAR C1K: 0001753713 C011PANY: CH-RISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-87 43 [email protected]



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 86

Christopher-Earl; Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721

Ph; 518·416·8743 email: [email protected]


United States Director of Nationallntelligenee (l} Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence Information Management Division Washington,District of Columbia 20511

Attn: Patricia Gaviria, Director, Information Management Division Information and Privacy Coordinator

Regarding: 5 USC §552a · Freedom of Infomation Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK {CES): SSN: 8 , :18 and EIN: H l


Patricia Gaviria, Director, Information Management Divis ion and or whom it may concern.

Undersigned /Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §5521-l ·Freedom ofinJormation Prtvacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency "Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: Ill 7 3 2 ?II and EIN: $7 • SSM; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself a an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing ofthis request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional infOrmation is required to aid the disclosure process; and

FuYther, in compliance with requirements ofthis agency. please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Undersigned understands tbe respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement le tter ; and

Further. Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosu1·e of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likel_v to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation o1· activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requesteri and

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <z>, served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus C.S>on Senior Executive Service member, DRS Chief Counsel tlohn Marshal Mitnick <4J.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant. Trustee of the Crypto Currenc.v Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions t51 filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

1 https:flwww.dnigov ~ h ttps://www. federa lregister.govldocut11enta/20 18/09/14120 18· 20203/im posing·certain ·sanctions·in ·the ·event ·of·foreign · :nterference·in·a·uni.ted·states·election · llt.tns ://aim 4t..rnthb log.fiies. wordpress.com/20 18/l 0/scotua·rula· 22· 3 ·writ·of·mandam. us·uscaaf-for·preserw~·paper baUots-1 0·.29· .!018.odf · llLtvs:J/www,dhs.gov/office·geueral-counsel inte1· alia The Gene:raJ Counsell$ the Department's 1-egulatory policy officer, nanalrulg the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Secur1ty regulatol'Y actions comply with t iHevaot statutes and executive orders.

htr.ps:t/www .SClibd .comldocument/393091608/Crypto· Currency· Resolution ·Trust -v-Bitcoin · Blen der·Organisa tion ·FILE i TAMPED?canlnaign=VigLink&ad_group=x.xclxx&som·ce=:hp_affiliate&medimn==affiliate

or about 2 April 2018 at'e related to the-letter and intent of the Executive Order issu~d on 21 December 2017 liD; and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Set'Vice Agent 'rom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743 and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

I"urther, Qu Monday 5 November 2018 at 11 =48 AM E.S.T. Affiant caUed 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, nnd Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at. 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further. on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent .Jim Cook who said 11 that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7 months was deplo.ved Wednesday oveJ'Seas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being cbnracterizecl by A.ffiant as an at:tua1national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual ti threat to Secretary Homeland Secwity Secretary .Kirstjen Jltf. Nielsen'' to which Undetsigned denied as an absurdity: and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: lUl attorney, in the 111ilitaq, owns a weapon and or goes hunting ... ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stat-ed unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. C',ook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Ca1·d and Securities Exchange Commission Registrantm Ca'rd, ifMr. Cook needed to speak further, and then Afftant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Fu1·thermore, based upon information and beliefUndersigned's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(g)(l); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:

L An imminent and ongoing threat. to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. A11 urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process rights of the Affiant requester exists_ 4. A harm to substantial humanitarian concerns exists.

VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK >


Accordingly, I. Christopher Earl Strunk, bemg duly swwrn,..n

of the United States of America that the foregoing i rue

Christopher EarlS esse Sui juris All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

RACHELA. HAYSLETTE Notary Public, State of New York warren County #01HA6378601

Commission Expires July 30, 2o:Jd-

n httpa://www.whitebouse.gov/presidential·artions/executhre·orderblocking·property-pei··ons·involved·seriomdtuman·righca· abuse·corruptionl 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK




-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 87

Christopher· Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846·1721


United States Marine Corps <1l Marine Corps Intelligence

Certified Mail Receipt No.: 70171070 0000 8249 8974

Intelligence De.partment Room 1A262B, 3000 Martine Corps Pentagon Washington, District of Columbia 20350·3000

Attn; Colonel Lawrence K. Huseey1

Intelligence Department Room 1A262B

Regarding; 5 USC §552a ~ Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER· EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: W • 5'2 P1 and EIN: J I J I L


Colonel Lawrence K. Hussey and or whom it may concern,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a ·Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for any and all Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency ''Threat Matrix" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the .name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: 171 _ t M and EIN:·n d P q· and

Affiant understands that by reque ting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may he required in order to facilitate the proces ing of this request routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is l'equh-ed to aid the disclosut'e process; and

I<'urthet, in compliance with requirements ofthi agency, please be advised that by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 not to exceed $50.001 unless granted a fee waiver; and


Further, Undersigned is an individual seeking information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Fttrther, Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request tor

disclosurtl of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities of tht government and is not ptimarily in the commercial interest of the requesteri anc

Further, on 29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 <2), served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus <s>on Senior Execuove Service member. DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick w.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff I Complainant Trustee of the Cr.vpto Curl'fmcy ResolutiOJJ Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions (5' filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

bttps://www.hqmc.madnes.millintelligence/Units/MClAI " h.t.tps:l/wwwJederalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018·20203/imposing·certain·sanctions·in·the·event·of·foreign· mterfet-ence·in ·a· united ·sta t.es·election ' https://aim 4trutll blog.files. wordpres.s.com/20 l 8/l0/scotus·ru1e·22· 3·writ·of·m.andamus·uscaaf·for-preserve·paper-ballots·! 0·29· !018.pdf • ~ttps:/lwww.dhs.gov/office·general·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, mana~p.ng the rulemaking program and ensuring that all Department of Homeland Security t·egulatoey actions corn.ply with :etevant statutes and executive orders.

m· about 2 April 2018 !U'e related to the letter and inteot ofthe Executive 01'der issued on 21 December 2017 Ca); and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness tQ Britain; and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from. 518 427 0400 a.nd left, a message on Unde1·signed'a mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved wit.h mobile phone 518·416-8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgeocyi and

Further. on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11 =48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent Tom Donahue who was not there, and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November, then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instructions to meet him on Wednesday at 1 PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further. on Wecln.esd.ay 7 November at 1 PM Affiant weut to the Secret Se1'Vice Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bo1.md Writ. but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said "that Agent Donahue who bad only been with the agency for 7 months was deployed Wednesday overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or rela.ted cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Executive Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undersigned to be an actual "thJ>eat to Secretary Homeland Security Secl'etary .KJI:stjen M. lVielserl' to which Undersigned denied as an absu11f.ity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if : Undersigned is: an attorney, in the military, owns a weapon ar1d ar goes hunting ... ? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity. Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchru1ge Commission Registrant(?} Card. if Mr. Cook needed to spoak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore. based upon information and belief Undersigned's request qualifies fur expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d}(1); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling aS:

l. An imminent and ongoing threat to the life or physical safety of an individual exists 2. An urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity exists and

that this option is available only for Affiant is ENGAGED IN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION. 3. An impairment of substantial due process l'ights of the Affiant requester exists. 4. A harm to substantial humanitatian concerns exists.

VERIFICATION AFFIDA V!T STATE OF 1\'EW YORK )


Accordingly, L Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly swo'!J;r.,._..~ of the United States of America that the foregoing i ... ..c,·u .......

a.lty of perjury under the laws

.u.J."""""J"U<i:r Earl Strunk in esse Sw jtu-is All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Subscribed and Sworn to bef01~ me

~~Lt·sj1 ~Jday~of NoJvef):_mb t' 2018 RACHELA.HAVSLETTE

fW Notary Public, State of New York Not ... ar'-'-y-"'P=u ..... b-li~c """"}~~ \Nerren County #01 HA637860~

commission Expires July 30, 20_

;; h ttps://www .sctibd.comldocutuen V39309l6GB/Crypto·Currency· Resol ubon -Trust·v· Bitcoin-Blender·Organiaation·FILE STAMPED?campatgn=VigLink&ad_gl"O\lp=xxclxx&.s<>ltrce=hp_affiliate&med:ium=a.ffiliate G https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential·actions/executtve-order·IJloding-propel'ty·persons·invol\•ed·serious·hum.an·ngbts· abuse·corrupl1on/ 7 S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 000175371:3 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona P.O. BOX 70 CORINTH NEW YORK 12822 518-416-8743 ch ris@privateamericancitizen .org



-against-Plaintiff,


Defendants.

19-CV-202 DNH/CFH


EXHIBIT 88

Christopher· Earl: Strunk in esse Sui jurie 141 Harris Avenue Lake Luzerne, New York 12846-1721


.Certified Mail Receipt No.: 7017 1070 0000 8249 8998

United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (I) Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington,District of Columbia 20530·0001


Regarding: 5 USC § 552a · Freedom of Information Privacy Act Request for CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES): SSN: 180 U MUB and EIN: ); 3: QUI:


Director of the Office of Information Policy and or whom it may concem,

Undersigned I Affiant is the sole beneficiary of this 5 USC §552a- Freedom ofinformation Privacy Act Request for any and aU Individual Personal Records, written and or electronically published and or for work product records, used in any intelligence and or United States Government agency ''Threat MatrLx" Assessment from January 2008 until the present associated with the name CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK (CES) with SSN: and EIN: 41 IJ0281U; and

Affiant understands that by requesting access to records about myself as an individual accordingly additional information may be required in order to facilitate the processing of this 1·equest routed to any agency component that will advise Undersigned if any additional information is xequired to aid the disclosure process; and

Further, in compliance with requirements ofthis agency, please be advised that. by making this FOIPA request, it shall be considered an agreement by Undersigned who will pay all applicable fees up to $25.00 uot to exceed $50.00, unless granted a fee waiver; and

Further, Unde1·signed understands the respondent will confirm this agreement in an acknowledgement letter; and

Further, Undersigned is an iudividual seelting information for personal use, not for commercial use; and Further. Undersigned requests the Fees otherwise chargeable in connection with this request for

disclosure of a record shall be waived or reduced where it is determined that disclosure is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operation or activities ofthe government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester: and

Further, on29 October 2018 Undersigned Petitioner, as a national security matter referenced by Executive Order 13848 of 12 September 2018 (2), served a copy of the Writ of Mandamus <a>on Senior Executive Service member, DHS Chief Counsel John Marshal Mitnick <4l.

Further, Undersigned is the Plaintiff/ Complainant Trustee of the C.rypto Curt·enc.v Resolution Trust of the Bahamas for several Court Actions <5> filed in the British Indian Ocean Territories Supreme Court that on

1 https:ftwv.rw.fbi.gov/services/information·management/f01pa 2 https:f/www .fede:ralregister .gov/documents/20 18/09/14/20 18-20203/im posi ng·certain · sanctions·in·the·event·of~ foretgn · mt.el'ference ·in·a ·united ·states·election ' https:f/aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018110/scotus·rule·22·3·writ·ofmandamus·uscaaf·for·preserve·paper·ballots·10·29· :l018.pdf • htt-ps:t/www .dhs.gov/offi.ce·geueral·counsel inter alia The General Counsel is the Department's regulatory policy officer, m!llla~png the rulemaking program and ensu1:ing that all Department of Homeland Security regulatory actions comply with relevant statutes and executive orders. \ https://www.scribd.com/documentf393091608/Crypto·CUI"Tency·Resolution·Trust·v·Bitcoi.n·Blender·Organisation·FILE :1TAMPED?campaign=VigLink&ad_group=xxclxx&source=hp_affi.liate&medium=affiliate

ur about 2 April2018 are related to the letter and intent ofthe Executive Order issued on 21 December 2017 <a); and for which Affiant will be required to travel with a passport as a witness to Britaini and

Further, that on 2 November 2018 U.S. Secret Service Agent Tom Donahue called from 518 427 0400 and left a message on Undersigned's mobile phone 718·414·3760 and affiant later that day retrieved with mobile phone 518·416·8743, and wherein message Agent Tom Donahue sought my return call without urgency; and

Fm-ther. on Monday 5 November 2018 at 11=48 AM E.S.T. Affiant called 518 427 0400 to speak with Agent tom Donahue who was not there. and Affiant was instructed to call on 6 November. then spoke with Agent Tom Donahue who gave me instr\lctions to meet him on Wednesday at l PM at the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Boulevard Suite 305 in Albany, New York; and then

Further, on Wednesday 7 November at 1 PM Affiant went to the Secret Service Office at 7 South Woods Blvd Suite 305 in Albany, New York 12211·2352 carrying copies of the varies court cases and bound Writ, but there was met by Secret Service Agent Jim Cook who said" that Agent Donahue who had only been with the agency for 7 months was depla,ved Wednesday overseas', and that Affiant must speak with Agent Jim Cook, who then refused to discuss the Writ or related cases, was not interested in discussing the Senior Execut1ve Service despite being characterized by Affiant as an actual national security threat, Agent Cook stated that he works for DHS that considers Undet·signed to be an actual" threat to Secretary Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen li!L Nielsen" to which Undersigned denied as an absurdity; and then Agent Cook wanted to know if: Undersigned is: a.r1 attorne~v, in the rmlitary, owns a weapon and or goes hunting. . .? To wit in utter amazement at such stupidity, Undersigned stated unequivocally NO! As such after Mr. Cook wasted Undersigned's time, Affiant gave Mr. Cook a Personal Card and Securities Exchange Commission Registrant<7> Cru.·d, if Mr. Cook needed to speak further, and then Affiant shook Mr. Cook's limp hand and proceeded home.

Furthermore, based upon information and belief Undet·signed's request qualifies for expedited treatment as it meets certain criteria established for instance is similarly as under DHS regulations. See 6 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(l); and that Undersigned request warrants expeditious handling as:




COUNTY OF WARREN )


Acco1·dingly. I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and ;;......---=o.~.der penalty of perjuxy under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoin s tr e 'nd correct.

SubsCl·ibed and Sworn to before me Thls~dav of November 201H

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui jill'is All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

G https:lf?<'WW.whltehouse.gov/presidential·actions/executive·order-blocking·property·pel'SOns·involved·serious·human·rights· iibuse·corruptionl i S.E.C. EDGAR CIK: 0001753713 COMPANY: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK

MR. CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK 141 HARRIS AVENUE LAKE LUZERNE, NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

U.S. Department of Justice

Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D. C. 20535

December 14, 2018

FOIPA Request No.: 1424068-000 Subject STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER EARL (JANUARY 2008 TO PRESENT)

This is inreferencelO your rettef1o the·Fs-1 ,-TiiwhlCfi you requested expedifeaprocesSing- for the above- -referenced Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request. Under Department of Justice (DOJ) standards, expedited processing can only be granted in the following situations.

You have requested expedited processing according to:

W 28 C.F.R. §16.5 (e)(1)(i): "Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual."

P 28 C.F.R. §16.5 (e)(1)(ii): "An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information."

W 28 C.F.R. §16.5 (e)(1)(iii): "The loss of substantial due process of rights."

r 28 C.F.R. §16.5 (e)(1)(iv): "A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exist possible questions about the government's integrity which affect public confidence."

You have not provided enough information concerning the statutory requirements for expedition; therefore, your request is denied. ·

For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi .gov/foia website under "Contact Us." The FOIPA Request number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request.

You may file an appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20530-0001, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA online portal by creating an account on the following web site: https:/lwww.foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/home. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days from the date of this letter in order to be considered timely . If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified .

You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at 877-684-6448, or by emailing [email protected]. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI's FOIA Public Liaison by emailing [email protected]. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email , the subject heading should clearly state "Dispute Resolution Services." Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified.

Sincerely,

~ David M. Hardy Section Chief Record/Information

Dissemination Section Information Management Division

I I I !

. '

-:;

U.S

. D

epar

tmen

t of

Ju

stic

e F

eder

al B

urea

u o

f In

vest

igat

ion

t.J(}

\iA

·?·?

0 ,.

<'

' ~~

....

•

,r"'"

" .,....,

. il

'"""

.t::

:-~

i...i

i.~

170

Mar

cel D

rive

Win

ches

ter,

VA

22

60

2-4

84

3

PM

3L

Offi

ti~l

i3U

SII1

CSS

Pe

nalty

for

J'ri

vlllc

Usc

S30

0

-:\._

...

,..~ .. ,'

f"'

,t•• \f

~~

'

.. ~,\~ ~;

IJ y ~\\~ ~; ~~

"~\\~ ~-~i

v ~

\\,:;.. ~

·.!~ ,t

\,~ ... '

''!~ .

(,\~

~''!

!~ .

r.,~

~''!

!~ '

'~'"'

...,, ..

. ~~ 1

/ =-t

. " ..

. ~~ 1

1--~ ~-~~ 1

1--:

:/.. ~-~~ 1

1 ~

,, -" ,

, ... ,, ~'

_-..;

; ,,

_ ,, '1

: -_

-..;;

,,_

,, ~

_-..;

; ,, ..

~~

;o:f

~~"·~*~~rs~"~~~~;~~,'~*3~;~~"'J*S~;~·

,.,.

,,,.-

,.,.

1\''-

,.,.

1

\ -

,.,.

,,

_ ....

. . ,_

_ ,,

..ill!

~-,__ ,, ~ ~ ,

_ ,,

'-''~-

,_ ,,

..-:

''~·

'-.

~

'~'·

*~''

~\~J

,h~"

~,,~

,,4'

~''~

,,~,

,/ ...... ~,~

\\~

"*...,

_ff., If

~\\~

y-' II.,.~~~~ Z

., ,1.. ....

1, ~~\\

~f._

.,. 'I

f.., l

.t ~\

\~J'

i ~.

2:S4

6···

i ?:

~:; i

4 i

,.J..'

.. ·-~

~.;,

;.,,

: ' ... '

::::

j11 ~~

·~~-~

-. >' '"

·;

¢ ~t~

''"

~~: .,f

.. '1-

i-!,-~~

:: ·!~

·~

-

? '..

<

.. ~;

,; ~;:~)

. • 0

2

1R

$

00.4

7°

o~ooo, 2

sso

occ

1 1

201

s M

AIL

ED

FR

OM

ZlP

CO

OE

22

5

iiI i ll

i i 1 j

' II j J

i II j ,

j, ii

I j /'

'''ill

d I'' i fit

i lj j

iII

j:J lj

iiii

JI/I

i 'i

U.S: Department of Justice

Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535

December 14, 2018

MR. CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK 141 HARRIS AVENUE LAKE LUZERNE, NY 12846-1721

Dear Mr. Strunk:

FOIPA Request No. : 1424068-000 Subject: STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER EARL (JANUARY 2008 TO PRESENT)

This acknowledges receipt of your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request to the FBI. Below you will find check boxes and informational paragraphs about your request, as well as specific determinations required by these statutes. Please read each one carefully.

P" Your request has been received at FBI Headquarters for processing.

r

r

r

Your request has been received at the ___ Resident Agency/ ___ Field Office and forwarded to FBI Headquarters for processing.

The subject of your request is currently being processed and documents will be released to you upon completion.

Release of responsive records will be posted to the FBI's electronic FOIA Library (The Vault), http:/vault.fbi.gov, and you will be contacted when the release is posted .

Your request for a public interest fee waiver is under consideration, and you will be advised of the decision at a later date. If your fee waiver is not granted, you will be responsible for applicable fees per your designated requester fee category below.

For the purpose of assessing any fees, we have determined:

r As a commercial use requester, you will be charged applicable search, review, and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC§ 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(l).

r As an educational institution, noncommercial scientific institution or representative of the news media requester, you will be charged applicable duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4){A)(ii)(ll).

~ As a general (all others) requester, you will be charged applicable search and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a){4)(A)(ii)(lll) .

Please check the status of your FOIPA request at www.fbi.gov/foia by clicking on FOIPA Status and entering your FOIPA Request Number. Status updates are adjusted weekly. The status of newly assigned requests may not be available until the next weekly update. If the FOIPA has been closed the notice will indicate that appropriate correspondence has been mailed to the address on file.

For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under "Contact Us." The FOIPA Request number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request.

You may file an appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20530-0001, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA online portal by creating an account on the following web site: https:/lwww.foiaonline.govlfoiaonline/action/public/home. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days from the date of this letter in order to be considered timely. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified.

You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at 877-684-6448, or by emailing [email protected]. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI's FOIA Public Liaison by emailing [email protected]. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state "Dispute Resolution Services." Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified.

Sincerely,

~ David M. Hardy Section Chief, Record/Information

Dissemination Section Information Management Division

\;~:

i\.

U.S

. D

epar

tmen

t o

f Ju

stic

e Fe

dera

l Bur

eau

of I

nves

tigat

ion

\/,:

?~ -~~

:£\)

170

Ma

rce

l Driv

e W

inch

este

t; V

A 22

602-

4843

. ~li

.}' ·.

C.rE

(: ., .

lf:;

OO

ktnl

flu

sine

ss

l'cn~lty f

or P

riva

te U

sc $

30(1

r.;:-.

:.'

I':"

,.

....

,..

~'\y

··~,.r~r.

·a•,~r\""-~,

·rr.aar~,

--'l.\c'"•

·~-

,1.

" ••

\.\~

~ If

~\

.\'-~

VI

~\\~ ~ f

J1

~,,.,.. ~

L."'

-~

.:.~

,rt,

~.;.

.\\l

j~ .

,,,~::.''''~ ,

(.,~

::.'

'"~

,,,,

~ :li

"f) ,

. ..~-~""

1/ :

:~. "-~

"" ,

,--::~~=\.~

~~-"::

:/.. ~:'

~~ ,,,.

:.• ~

. ~· =~ ''-

: .. ~'

~t =~ ,,

__ ;:,,

,. ":::~ ,

, .. _;:,,

~ "

:::~ ,

, :.~',

_, ,;~"

· ~~~.

;:;~

"; ~"

~~~~

~":.

A'l' ~'

'-.3~":. A"

' J/'-.

3~"-::

.-:

•\ ,,

-

., ,

, -

....

1\

-,

1\

-...

. '

.;..

,, ~ "' .. .;

.. ,,

l ~

.,:.

.. ~ ,,

iol! ''"'· .;

.. ,,

flO!:''

"' ... ,

.. ~

_t\'

4J,*

~"~'

~.,.

;,..

.""~

''~ •·

4-~"

~,,~

&•4

-~''

~ ,,~

' ~\~ ~~

II.

•• (\,\~ ~-

IJ

•• ~'

-\."'-

--~-

"1.1

•. ~'

'"-~-

~~

~ t~\

....._

~

.\

~-<.

'iS

• •

<:J ':1

.

. ....

~.--

.

;!

• ---~-

!>. ..

•

/:E~~..:::::~.=-

:)

........_

, ~1

1Nf

'I fl

tH.v

t~J

,

0 2

1R

$ 00

.47°

oo

ooo

1 2s

ao

a::c

i 1

20 1

a M

AIL

ED

FR

OM

ZIP

CO

DE

22

60

2 r

' ~

J

• f

:;-~~E

~:::}E

:-3·

·;::

~"2 i

~f

'JI!

i;ijj)

, i jl E

iJlw

jiiJi

jiji j

;jis 1

i lJ l!l

l i' i;

jij ,,

ii.; i

iii hi

' '

Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona - Patriots for Truth

Documents

Transcript of Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona - Patriots for Truth