Karstic ponds and pools: history, biodiversity and conservation
Benthic dynamics within a land-based semi-intensive aquaculture fish farm: the importance of...
Transcript of Benthic dynamics within a land-based semi-intensive aquaculture fish farm: the importance of...
Benthic dynamics within a land-based semi-intensiveaquaculture fish farm: the importance of settlementponds
Susana Carvalho Æ Manuela Falcao Æ Joao Curdia Æ Ana Moura ÆDalila Serpa Æ Miguel B. Gaspar Æ Maria Teresa Dinis ÆPedro Pousao-Ferreira Æ Luıs Cancela da Fonseca
Received: 8 February 2008 / Accepted: 6 October 2008 / Published online: 31 October 2008� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008
Abstract The present work aims to assess the importance of settlement ponds (SP) in
semi-intensive fish farms by studying benthic dynamics in an aquaculture fish farm, more
specifically in the water reservoir (WR) and SP and also in production (P) and nonpro-
duction (C) ponds during a 16-month period. In Portugal, a SP is only mandatory for
intensive fish farms, and another objective of the present study is to assess the importance
of these areas in semi-intensive fish farms. The WR was the area with highest diversity and
evenness, as well as the higher number of exclusive taxa and taxa sensitive to organic
enrichment. P and SP samples showed signs of higher disturbance levels, emphasized
namely by the association of the opportunistic annelids Capitella spp. and Tubificidae.
However, the benthic data from SP points to lower disturbance levels than P both due to an
increase in the percentage of sensitive taxa observed in June and October 2004 and by the
association of this latter sample with water reservoir samples as evidenced by canonical
correspondence analysis. Moreover, a higher and increasing number of taxa when com-
pared with the P area were also observed. Therefore, in semi-intensive fish farms, where
effluents from P ponds are directly discharged to the lagoon, the potential environmental
impacts would be more severe. In conclusion, the imposition of SP in semi-intensive fish
farms should be considered, especially because most fish farms are located within relevant
wetland areas.
S. Carvalho (&) � M. Falcao � J. Curdia � A. Moura � D. Serpa � M. B. Gaspar � P. Pousao-FerreiraInstituto Nacional de Recursos Biologicos (INRB, I.P.)/IPIMAR,Av. 5 de Outubro, 8700-305 Olhao, Portugale-mail: [email protected]
M. T. DinisCCMAR-FCMA, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Gambelas, Portugal
L. Cancela da FonsecaFCMA, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Gambelas, Portugal
L. Cancela da FonsecaLaboratorio Marıtimo da Guia/Centro de Oceanografia (FCUL),Av. N. Sra. Do Cabo, 939, 2750-374 Cascais, Portugal
123
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587DOI 10.1007/s10499-008-9227-1
Keywords Settlement ponds � Macrobenthic communities � Organic enrichment �Fish farming � Southern Portugal
Introduction
Currently, in Portugal most of land-based marine fish farming is undertaken within
earthen ponds under semi-intensive conditions. Nevertheless, as in other parts of the
world, little information is available regarding benthic processes (either biological or
geochemical) occurring in such production conditions (e.g. Hussenot and Martin 1995;
Riise and Roos 1997; Ganguly et al. 1999; Nunes and Parsons 2000; Tovar et al. 2000;
Mohanty 2001; Martınez-Cordova and Pena-Messina 2005; Heilskov et al. 2006; Carv-
alho et al. 2007). Most of these studies concern shrimp production and were not
undertaken in Europe. The impacts of fish farm production have mainly been focused on
offshore or floating cages in estuaries and bays (e.g. Hall et al. 1990; Findlay et al. 1995;
Troell and Berg 1997; Karakassis et al. 1999, 2000; Butler et al. 2001; Chamberlain
et al. 2001; Pohle et al. 2001; Katz et al. 2002; Vezzulli et al. 2002; Chou et al. 2004;
Pereira et al. 2004; Islam 2005; Tomassetti and Porrello 2005; Kalantzi and Karakassis
2006; Mente et al. 2006).
Fish production may have a strong negative effect on natural fish populations as a
consequence of the enormous needs of fish (from natural stocks) to be converted into
farmed fish feed (Naylor et al. 2000) and on the deterioration of coastal areas due to high
loads of organic matter and nutrients resulting from fish production (Hall et al. 1990,
1992; Holby and Hall 1991; Holmer and Kristensen 1992; Karakassis et al. 1998;
Christensen et al. 2000). The changes observed in sediment chemistry affect benthic
communities, usually by reducing species richness and biomass and increasing abun-
dance values (Weston 1990). This is a consequence of the enhancement of both aerobic
and anaerobic microbial activity in organically enriched sediments, resulting in dissolved
oxygen depletion and production of toxic products such as H2S (Holmer and Kristensen
1992). As a consequence, benthic fauna may completely disappear, creating an azoic
zone (Heilskov and Holmer 2001). This is of major concern as it is widely recognised
that benthic fauna plays an important role both in supplying and mineralising organic
matter (Heilskov and Holmer 2001), but can also act as food resource for the cultivated
fish (Gamito 1997). Therefore, the analysis of benthic communities in fish farm sedi-
ments may be valuable to assess the evolution of environmental quality within fish ponds
and settlement ponds as well as the importance of the latter. Moreover, fish production in
land-based fish farms involves large costs, namely in terms of water demand, oxygen
supply, food, antibiotics and electricity. They are also costly in terms of human
resources, as fish ponds require daily management due to the rapid growth of several
types of primary producers that must be removed to allow water circulation and avoid
oxygen depletion (Bartoli et al. 2005).
Environmental concern about the impacts resulting from fish farming has increased
during the last decades. For example, in 1993 decision makers from the Orbetello area
imposed the construction of phytotreatment ponds between fish farms and the lagoon in
order to decrease organic and nitrogen loadings (e.g. Porrello et al. 2003b). In these ponds,
high levels of nitrogen and phosphorous enhance rapid growth rates of algal macrovege-
tation, which remove N and P from the fish farm effluent (Porrello et al. 2003b). However,
as these ponds are not managed, this positive effect is lost in summer when vegetation dies
572 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
and its mineralization results in the release of N and P (Porrello et al. 2003b). These
authors found that the control of Ulva rigida standing stocks eliminating the excess bio-
mass may represent a successful approach to improve the reduction of N values (Porrello
et al. 2003a). Also, in shrimp farms in Thailand, the local department of fisheries are
encouraging shrimp farmers to use settlement ponds in order to improve the quality of
effluents (Ehler et al. 2007). These authors have shown that, with this strategy, nitrogen
concentrations in the water column will be reduced. Sediment must, however, be managed
to reduce remineralization during successive cropping cycles (Ehler et al. 2007). Man-
agement options proposed by these authors included periodical removal of settlement pond
sludge or drying ponds between crops. In the same study, it was also observed that adding
coconut fronds to the settlement ponds enhanced N removal. Like with the Ulva, vegetal
cover must be regularly removed to maintain efficiency. Experimental studies should be
undertaken in other systems in order to confirm these results. However, based on the
present and previous studies, it appears that the combination effect of settlement ponds and
a controlled used of macrovegetation within these areas, associated with a proper man-
agement scheme, would be encouraging in order to reduce the detrimental impacts
resulting from fish farming. Currently in Portugal settlement ponds are only mandatory for
intensive production. In semi-intensive fish farms effluents are directly discharged to the
adjacent lagoon channel. The purpose of the settlement ponds in a fish farm is to allow
organically rich particles in suspension to settle and avoid the discharge of water with high
organic loads into the main ecosystem. This is particularly important as the majority of fish
farms in Portugal (and probably worldwide) are located within important wetlands, some
of them protected by Portuguese law (protected areas) and/or European Directives. The
present work aims to assess the importance of settlement ponds in semi-intensive fish farms
by studying benthic dynamics in an aquaculture fish farm, more specifically in the water
reservoir and settlement pond, and also in production and nonproduction ponds (control)
during a 16-month period.
Materials and methods
Sampling strategy
The present study was undertaken within the Olhao Fish Culture Experimental Station,
located in the Ria Formosa Lagoon (southern Portugal, Fig. 1). Sampling was carried out
during a 16-month period (June 2003 to October 2004) at four different areas within an
aquaculture fish farm: the water reservoir (WR), the settlement pond (SP), a 400-m2 white
seabream [Diplodus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758)] semi-intensive production area (P) and a
similar area with no production, designated as control (C). In both ponds, the daily water
turnover rate varied between 20% and 40%, depending on water temperature and fish
biomass (in the case of the P area). Fish from the P area were fed with dry pellets every
hour for 15 min, between sunrise and sunset, using an automatic feeder. At the production
area the rearing of approximately 3,000 fish started on June 12, 2003. Both production and
control areas present similar conditions of water renewal and are filled with seawater
pumped from the WR. At the beginning of the experiment no animal life was present in P
and C ponds. The WR and SP, however, had already been filled for 6 months. Sampling
was undertaken in June, July, August and November 2003, and March, June and October
2004, following a D. sargus production cycle.
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 573
123
Macrobenthic communities
For each sampling period and area, three replicates were collected randomly using hand
corers (0.02 m2 total area per replicate). The macrofaunal samples were washed through a
0.5-mm square mesh sieve, and the retained material was preserved in 4% buffered
formaldehyde stained with Rose Bengal. In the laboratory, animals were hand-sorted into
major taxonomic groups, identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level and counted.
Environmental procedures
At each area, three sediment cores per replicate (PVC tubes of 15 cm length and 5 cm
diameter) and overlying water samples were collected by scuba divers. Sediment sampling
was carried out by carefully pushing the open-ended PVC tube into the sediment in order to
Fig. 1 A Ria Formosa Lagoon, southern coast of Portugal: location of the studied aquaculture fish farm.B Schematic layout of the aquaculture fish farm. WR water reservoir, SP settlement pond, P production area,C control area. PS pumping system, IFW inflowing water, OFW outflowing water
574 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
prevent any disturbance of sediment layers. Overlying water was collected 2 cm above the
sediment surface directed with precleaned syringes.
In laboratory, sediment cores were sliced in 2-cm layers, and samples were centrifuged
for 10 min at 3,000 rpm (1,600g) to separate pore-water from solid fraction. Prior to
analysis, pore-water and overlying water samples were filtered with 0.45-lm Macherey-
Nagel filters. Samples were analysed for ammonium (NH4?) and phosphate (HPO4
2-) using
a Skalar autoanalyser according to the Grasshoff (1983) methodology. Suspended partic-
ulate matter retained in glass-fibre filters was analysed for organic matter content, based on
weight loss after ignition at 450�C for 3 h. The upper sediment layer (0–2 cm) was dried to
80�C to constant weight and ground to a fine powder for determination of total organic
carbon (TOC) using a CNH analyser (NC 2500 CE instruments) with acetanilide as ref-
erence material (Byers et al. 1978). Chlorophyll a (chl a) and phaeopigments (Phaeop)
were extracted with acetone (90%) and determined by fluorimetry according to Parsons
et al. (1984). Sediment porosity was calculated from sediment weight loss at 105�C.
Data analysis
Faunal data were analysed for mean density, mean number of species (S), diversity
(Shannon–Wiener index H0, log2) and equitability (J0). These variables were calculated for
each sampling area and period. Multivariate analyses were performed using PRIMER v5.0
software (Clarke and Gorley 2001). Faunal data was analysed by ordination techniques
(nonmetric multidimensional scaling, MDS) based on Bray–Curtis similarity coefficient
after log(x ? 1) transformation. Each identified species was assigned to one of the five
ecological groups proposed by the marine biotic index AMBI based upon the list available
from the AMBI webpage (http://www.azti.es). The classification of species behaviour is
mainly related to their sensitivity to organic enrichment. Associations between assemblage
patterns and environmental parameters were analysed by canonical correspondence anal-
ysis (CCA), using the CANOCO v.4.5 program. A matrix of explanatory variables was
constructed to evaluate correlations between environmental parameters, species and vari-
ance in site patterns. This matrix comprised the following environmental variables:
suspended particles, chl a content, phaeo content, total organic carbon, sediment porosity,
NH4? concentration in pore-water, NH4
? concentration in overlying water, HPO42- con-
centration in pore-water and HPO42- concentration in overlying water. Monte Carlo
permutation tests were used to check the statistical validity of these associations. The
analyses were carried out using square-root-transformed abundances. The percentage
variability explained by the canonical correspondence analysis was determined by dividing
the sum of all canonical eigenvalues by the overall sum of eigenvalues from the corre-
spondence analysis (ter Braak and Verdonschot 1995).
Results
Water reservoir
In this area 101 taxa were identified, corresponding to a total of 5,948 individuals. Nev-
ertheless, 12 taxa were responsible for more than 90% of the total abundance, namely:
Microdeutopus gryllotalpa Da Costa, 1853, Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata (Okuda,
1937), Chironomidae, Capitella spp., Cerastoderma spp., Hydroides elegans (Haswell,
1883), Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant, 1777), Anthozoa, Bittium reticulatum (Da Costa, 1778),
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 575
123
Abra ovata (Philippi, 1836), Akera bullata O. F. Muller, 1776 and Gammarus insensibilisStock, 1966. The two first species were clearly dominant, presenting 1,476 and 1,361
individuals, respectively. However, their abundance decreased during the study period. M.gryllotalpa attained a peak of abundance in August 2003 (192.0 ± 209.6 ind. 9 0.02 m-2)
and P. paucibranchiata reached a maximum in July 2003 (141.7 ± 66.6 ind. 9 0.02 m-2)
(Table 1). The taxa Jujubinus striatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Ruditapes decussatus (Linnaeus,
1758), Heteromastus filiformis (Claparede, 1864), Spirorbidae, Gammarella fucicola(Leach, 1814), Lumbrineris gracilis (Ehlers, 1868) and Diopatra neapolitana Delle Chiaje,
1841 were also recorded among the most abundant species in some of the sampling periods
(Table 1). During the study period, the mean number of species did not present large
oscillations, varying from 14.0 ± 6.6 taxa 9 0.02 m-2 (June 2003) to 22.7 ± 2.9
taxa 9 0.02 m-2 (November 2003) (Fig. 2). In terms of abundance, an increase was
observed initially, reaching 457.0 ± 105.1 ind. 9 0.02 m-2 in July, but after November
2003 a generally decreasing trend was observed until the end of the study period (Fig. 2).
On the other hand, Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou’s equitability generally increased
from June 2003 until October 2004 (Fig. 2).
Settlement pond
The settlement pond was characterised by the taxa Capitella spp., M. gryllotalpa, Tubi-
ficidae, Neanthes caudata (Delle Chiaje, 1827), Desdemona ornata Banse, 1957 and
Chironomidae. Together, these six taxa (out of 43) accounted for more than 90% of the
total abundance (6,481 ind.). The polychaete Capitella spp. was clearly dominant, repre-
senting more than 50% of the total abundance (3,505 ind.), and did not show large
variability in abundance during the study period, except a slight decrease in October 2004
(Table 1). Concerning the biological variables analysed, the mean number of species
showed a general increasing trend. The exception was August 2003, when the minimum
value of 1.7 ± 0.6 taxa 9 0.02 m-2 was observed (Fig. 2). The diversity and evenness
indices presented a similar trend with extremely low values observed in August 2003
(Fig. 2). On the other hand, abundance showed some oscillations with a minimum in
November 2003 (118.3 ± 18.1 ind. 9 0.02 m-2) and maximum in March 2004
(491.3 ± 187.2 ind. 9 0.02 m-2) (Fig. 2).
Production area
A total of 4,951 individuals distributed in 29 taxa were collected within the production
area. The polychaetes Capitella spp. and P. paucibranchiata accounted for more than 90%
of total abundance. Capitella spp. was absent until August, reached a peak in November
(381.7 ± 117.4 ind. 9 0.02 m-2) and remained relatively high until the end of the study
period (Table 1). P. paucibranchiata showed higher abundance values in August 2003
(114.7 ± 38.4 ind. 9 0.02 m-2). The number of species was rather constant but also low,
never reaching more than 6.0 ± 1.7 taxa 9 0.02 m-2 (October 2004) (Fig. 2). Abundance
was very low in the two first sampling periods, increasing afterwards with some fluctua-
tions (Fig. 2). Diversity and evenness indices showed similar temporal patterns with a peak
in July 2003 (H0 = 1.71 ± 0.24; J0 = 0.85 ± 0.12) and a minimum in November 2003 for
diversity (0.37 ± 0.18) and June 2004 for evenness (0.16 ± 0.05), with values increasing
again in October 2004 (Fig. 2).
576 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
Ta
ble
1M
ean
abu
ndan
ce(N
,in
d.
90
.02
m-
2)
and
cum
ula
tive
per
cen
tag
e(C
um
%)
of
the
mo
reab
un
dan
tta
xa
for
each
sam
pli
ng
area
and
per
iod
Jun
-03
Jul-
03
Au
g-0
3N
ov
-03
Ta
xaN
Cu
m%
Ta
xaN
Cum
%T
axa
NC
um
%T
axa
NC
um
%
WR P
.p
au
cib
ran
chia
ta8
8.7
54
.7C
hir
ono
mid
ae1
44
.33
4.7
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
10
0.0
36
.6M
.g
ryll
ota
lpa
16
8.7
41
.9
Ch
iro
no
mid
ae5
7.3
86
.8P
.p
au
cib
ran
chia
ta1
41
.76
6.8
M.
gry
llo
talp
a1
92
.06
2.4
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
83
.06
3.3
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.1
7.0
93
.5C
eras
tod
erm
asp
p.
59
.38
2.0
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.2
1.7
70
.4C
ap
itel
lasp
p.
49
.37
5.5
An
tho
zoa
25
.38
7.9
H.
eleg
an
s2
9.3
78
.1H
.el
egan
s2
3.0
82
.7
H.
eleg
ans
20
.79
2.8
An
tho
zoa
20
.78
2.9
A.
ova
ta1
2.7
86
.7
H.
ulv
ae1
7.0
86
.5H
.u
lvae
16
.08
9.6
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.1
2.3
90
.0A
nth
ozo
a3
1.3
92
.2
SP
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.2
78
.76
8.9
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.1
52
.37
2.7
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.1
82
.09
9.7
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.1
00
.39
3.0
N.
cau
dat
a9
2.3
92
.3N
.ca
ud
ata
26
.09
4.3
P
Ch
iro
no
mid
ae2
7.0
65
.5C
hir
ono
mid
ae4
.73
9.0
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.2
25
.36
2.9
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.3
81
.79
6.1
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
22
.39
6.3
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.2
.06
6.5
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
11
4.7
10
0.0
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
5.0
88
.7
A.
ova
ta1
.31
00
.0
C
Chir
on
om
idae
11
7.3
58
.1C
hir
ono
mid
ae1
49
.76
2.2
Ch
iro
no
mid
ae1
52
.79
8.6
Ch
iro
no
mid
ae2
2.3
73
.4
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.1
10
.39
5.1
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.1
61
.09
8.7
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.9
.09
6.8
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 577
123
Ta
ble
1co
nti
nu
ed
Mar
-04
Jun
-04
Oct
-04
Ta
xaN
Cu
m%
Ta
xaN
Cu
m%
Ta
xaN
Cum
%
WR M
.g
ryll
ota
lpa
68
.02
9.6
M.
gry
llo
talp
a4
0.0
16
.7H
.fi
lifo
rmis
6.3
21
.2
B.
reti
cula
tum
17
.74
5.1
Ca
pit
ella
spp
.2
5.3
32
.2B
.re
ticu
latu
m6
.04
0.1
A.
ova
ta1
4.3
60
.5H
.u
lvae
22
.74
7.6
J.st
ria
tus
5.7
54
.4
H.
ulv
ae
17
.37
4.0
P.
pa
uci
bra
nch
iata
30
.36
2.0
A.
ova
ta4
.76
8.7
Cap
itel
lasp
p.
12
.37
8.9
A.
ova
ta1
3.7
73
.6S
pir
orb
idae
6.3
76
.8
J.st
ria
tus
10
.08
2.8
A.
bu
lla
ta2
2.3
84
.8G
.fu
cico
la1
1.0
82
.6
H.
eleg
ans
7.3
86
.4B
.re
ticu
latu
m1
7.7
89
.8L
.g
raci
lis
3.0
88
.6
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.4
.78
9.3
R.
dec
uss
taus
4.0
93
.8D
.n
eap
oli
tan
a1
.39
3.4
A.
bu
lla
ta4
.39
1.4
SP T
ub
ifici
dae
20
5.7
55
.0M
.g
ryll
ota
lpa
22
6.3
48
.2C
apit
ella
spp
.9
7.3
38
.4
Cap
itel
lasp
p.
18
2.0
77
.3C
ap
itel
lasp
p.
17
5.7
91
.7M
.g
ryll
ota
lpa
47
.77
3.5
D.
orn
ata
69
.39
4.7
A.
ova
ta2
2.0
8.2
C.
ach
erusi
cum
15
.78
9.0
N.
cau
dat
a5
.79
3.3
Cer
asto
der
ma
spp
.2
.09
2.1
P
Cap
itel
lasp
p.
18
7.0
95
.1C
ap
itel
lasp
p.
32
2.0
98
.1C
apit
ella
spp
.1
56
.77
1.4
N.
cau
dat
a2
4.0
91
.8
C
Chir
on
om
idae
15
.34
5.9
Ch
iro
no
mid
ae8
9.0
78
.2C
hir
on
om
idae
20
.07
4.6
Cap
itel
lasp
p.
14
.77
5.1
M.
gry
llo
talp
a2
1.0
90
.9M
.g
ryll
ota
lpa
6.7
86
.2
B.
reti
cula
tum
8.0
10
0.0
WR
Wat
erre
serv
oir
;S
PS
ettl
emen
tpond;
PP
rodu
ctio
nar
ea;
CC
on
tro
lar
ea
578 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
Control area
In this area 32 taxa were collected, totalling 2,941 individuals. Four taxa (Chironomidae,
Cerastoderma spp., Capitella spp. and M. gryllotalpa) were responsible for more than 90%
of total abundance. The insects and the bivalves were visibly dominant, presenting a total
abundance of 1,699 and 843 individuals, respectively. Regarding Cerastoderma spp., this
genus showed a clear drop from July 2003 (161.0 ± 116.1 ind. 9 0.02 m-2) to August
(1.0 ± 1.7 ind. 9 0.02 m-2), and subsequent recovery was not observed until the end of
the study period. Concerning the biological variables, the number of species was low and
more or less constant in this area (Fig. 2). On the other hand, abundance was initially high,
mainly due to chironomids and Cerastoderma spp., but decreasing after July, following the
abundance decrease of the bivalves (Fig. 2; Table 1) and remained relatively constant from
November 2003 to October 2004 (Fig. 2). A peak of diversity and evenness was observed
in March 2004 (H0 = 1.80 ± 0.48; J0 = 0.95 ± 0.04), while the minimum values were
recorded in August 2003 (H0 = 0.41 ± 0.33; J0 = 0.16 ± 0.09) (Fig. 2).
Community structure
The comparative analysis of the nonmetric MDS diagrams for each of the studied areas is
shown in Fig. 3. Two main groups could be distinguished in each area and the most
Fig. 2 Variation of the mean number of species (S, taxa 9 0.02 m-2), abundance (N, ind. 9 0.02 m-2),Shannon–Wiener diversity (H0) and Pielou’s equitability index (J0) during the sampling period. Vertical barsrepresent SD. WR water reservoir, SP settlement pond, P production area, C control area
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 579
123
striking result was the separation between June and July 2003 samples from the others in
both SP and P areas (Fig. 3). Except for the October 2004 sampling period, the WR
showed less temporal variability when compared with the other areas. The C area samples
from 2003 appeared separated from those of 2004 (Fig. 3). The different patterns reflect
the dissimilarities in faunal composition and biological variables, as well as in the envi-
ronmental parameters. The CCA analysis of the species abundance data with stepwise
selection of environmental parameters retained three of these parameters: chl a, HPO42-
concentration in overlying water and porosity (Fig. 4). The first three axes of the CCA
diagram were statistically significant (axes 1 and 2, P \ 0.01; axis 3, P \ 0.05) and
presented the eigenvalues 0.276, 0.231 and 0.141, respectively, for a total inertia of 2.487,
therefore explaining 26.1% of the total variance of species data (Table 2). Cumulative
percentage of variance concerning species data was 26.1% (three first axes) and for spe-
cies-environment relation was 100% (Table 2).
The first ordination axis described a gradient from samples with high porosity and
HPO42- concentration in overlying water (negative end) to samples with high chl a. On the
other hand, the second ordination axis is mainly correlated to high concentrations of chl aand porosity. There was a clear pattern of species mainly associated to high chl a con-
centrations, such as the Tubificidae, D. ornata, G. insensibilis, N. caudata and Capitellaspp. (Fig. 4). Therefore, these species showed a high affinity to organically enriched
sediment with high microphytobenthos productivity. The species that are characteristic of
areas with less chl a values are mainly discriminated by porosity: the taxa Chironomidae,
Cerastoderma spp., P. paucibranchiata, Nemertini, H. elegans, B. reticulatum, Podarke sp.
Fig. 3 Cluster and MDS diagrams applying the Bray–Curtis similarity index after log(x ? 1) transforma-tion of the abundance data for each one of the analysed areas. WR water reservoir, SP settlement pond, Pproduction area, C control area
580 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
and M. gryllotalpa were associated with samples of lower porosity, whereas A. bullata,
Corophium acherusicum (Costa, 1851), H. ulvae, Anthozoa and A. ovata were associated
with organically poor and coarser sediments (Fig. 4). The higher concentrations of HPO42-
were associated with samples from the WR and/or high-temperature sampling dates. This
association do not seem to have any relationship to fish production but with the increasing
availability of this parameter with increasing seawater temperature as observed by Serpa
et al. (2007a) for the Ria Formosa Lagoon. The WR is the area with more species, as the
majority of the represented species’ centroids are located more closely to the WR centroid
(Fig. 4). Both WR and C areas showed a lower temporal variability than that presented by
Fig. 4 Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination diagrams for macrobenthic species square-rootabundance data. For results of CCA see Table 2. Sample scores for each area and species scores along thefirst and second axes in relation to environmental parameters (Porosity, sediment porosity; chl a, chlorophylla concentration; HPO4
2- OW, HPO42- concentration in overlying water). h, water reservoir; j, settlement
pond; d, production area, s, control area. T1, T2, T3 and T4 represent June, July, August and November2003, respectively; T5, T6 and T7 represent March, June and October 2004, respectively. The vector linesreflect the relationship of significant environmental variables to the ordination axes, and their length isproportional to their relative significance. The orthogonal projection of a species point onto anenvironmental arrow represents the approximate centre of the species distribution along the particularenvironmental gradient. All species with more than eight individuals are presented
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 581
123
the P and SP samples (Fig. 4). Two associations of samples should be mentioned: C and P
samples of June (first sampling period); and sample of October 2004 of the SP and sample
of June from the WR (Fig. 4).
Figure 5 shows the relative percentage of sensitive (I), indifferent (II), tolerant (III),
second-order opportunist (IV) and first-order opportunist (V) species per sampling period
and area. It is clear that the higher percentage of sensitive species was found in the WR,
which also presented the lowest percentage of first-order opportunists (Fig. 5). During
most of the sampling periods, SP was clearly dominated by first-order opportunists (mainly
Capitella spp.), but in June 2004 and in October 2004, a visible increase of sensitive
species was recorded (Fig. 5), indicating better quality of the benthic environment. The
production area was initially dominated by tolerant and second-order opportunists. How-
ever, after August 2003 and until the end of the study period first-order opportunists were
the main ecological group (Fig. 5). In the control area, only in November 2003 (22.7%)
and in March 2004 (31.4%) were first-order opportunists relatively well represented
(Fig. 5). Second-order opportunists were generally dominant, although after November
2003 a clear increase of sensitive species was observed (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Within land-based fish farms, the WR behave like small lagoons where there are one or
more openings to a tidal channel usually supporting macrofaunal communities that are
characteristic of estuarine-like systems (Gamito 1997, 2006). In fact the macrobenthic
communities of the WR analysed in the present study are common to those observed in Ria
Formosa Lagoon (Sprung 1994). When compared with the other areas analysed, the WR
presented a higher number of species, diversity and evenness, and exclusive species, as
well as a higher percentage of taxa sensitive to organic enrichment. The C area did not
present a disturbance due to organic enrichment but is conditioned by the water pump
system, justifying the reduced number of species observed when compared with the water
reservoir. The difference between the WR and the C area is also observed in the CCA,
which reflects the difference in species number and faunal composition between the two
areas. The two impacted areas (P and SP) exhibit a clear difference. While the SP has also
a direct connection with the lagoon to allow the discharges of effluents, the P area has a
Table 2 Results of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of macrobenthic species abundance data aftersquare-root transformation for the areas and periods studied
CCA Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Total inertia
Eigenvalue 0.276 0.231 0.141 2.487
F ratio 2.999 2.801 1.846
P value 0.002 0.002 0.034
Species-environment correlation 0.870 0.763 0.835
Cumulative % variance
Species data 11.1 20.4 26.1
Species-environment relationship 42.6 78.2 100
Correlations between the three first canonical axes and environmental parameters are presented as well asthe cumulative percentage of variance for the canonical axes for the species data and the species-envi-ronment relationship
582 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Jun-03 Jul Aug Nov Mar-04 Jun Oct
Sampling periods
I II III IV V
0
20
40
60
80
100
WR
SP
P
C
Fig. 5 Relative contribution of ecological groups during the study period for each analysed area. WR waterreservoir, SP settlement pond, P production area, C control area. Classification of species according tosensitivity to organic enrichment: I Sensitive species, II indifferent species, III tolerant species, IV second-order opportunistic species, V first-order opportunistic species
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 583
123
more restricted water circulation. Therefore, it would be expected that the impact of
organic enrichment was most pronounced in this area. The higher disturbance levels
observed in these two areas were reflected in the increase of the dominance levels of
opportunistic annelids such as Capitella spp. and tubificids (Pearson and Rosenberg 1978).
This association was also evident in the CCA analysis as these species with Desdemonaornata, Gammarus insensibilis and Neanthes caudata were associated with the assem-
blages from the P and SP areas, as well as with high concentrations of chlorophyll a in the
sediment. Enhancement of microphytobenthos production is usually associated with
organically richer sediments, as in these sediments benthic remineralization is favored
(Brotas et al. 1990; Gutierrez et al. 2000). In fact, a significant relationship between
organic carbon and chlorophyll a in production ponds was already observed by Serpa et al.
(2007b) (TOC = -0.98 9 Chl a2 ? 60 9 Chl a ? 284). Therefore, these species not
only show a high affinity to high microphytobenthos productivity but also to organically
enriched sediments, which is in agreement with their association with SP and P areas. It is
worth noting that in terms of macrobenthic structure the SP present a better environmental
quality than the P area, emphasized by the higher number of sensitive taxa observed
particularly in June and October 2004, as well as by the association of this latter sample
and the June 2004 sample from the WR. Although the first sample collected within the P
area was closely related to the C samples, with the beginning of the production cycle
changes in benthic environment seem to begin promptly, as the samples from July and
August from both areas were clearly separated.
There is some evidence for Ria Formosa Lagoon that N and P entering the system are
promptly removed by primary producers (Falcao and Vale 2003). Serpa et al. (2007b)
found that, in white seabream fish earthen ponds, impacts on bottom sediment may be
observed when fish biomass and feeding rate exceed 500 g 9 m-3 and
150 kg 9 month-1, as then settled material, organic matter decomposition, nutrients in
pore-water and microphytobenthos production increase substantially. Nevertheless,
wastewater discharges with high nitrogen and phosphorous levels may lead to the dete-
rioration of water quality of coastal areas. The environmental impact depends strongly on
species, culture method, stocking density, food composition, feeding techniques and
hydrological regime of the site (Tovar et al. 2000). A recent study undertaken in the Ria
Formosa Lagoon showed that the effect of fish farming activity was more intense in
summer due to the higher loadings of dry feed added (Hubert et al. 2006). Moreover, the
organic matter decomposition rate is also higher during summer months, with a consequent
increase in oxygen consumption and potential sediment reduction (Bucci et al. 1992;
Millet and Guelorget 1994). Hubert et al. (2006) also found that the effects of effluents
from semi-intensive production were more harmful than those from intensive production.
The probable reason is the existence of a decantation process in the latter. Although the
effect may be insufficient in summer, this result supported the positive effect of settling
ponds in reducing organic matter and nutrients from effluent waters. In this way, the
discharges to adjacent lagoon systems may have a lower environmental impact, namely in
terms of eutrophication.
In Portugal and throughout Europe, the effects of discharges from land-based aqua-
culture fish farms on biodiversity are largely unknown. However, most fish farms are
located within protected coastal areas, most of which have high ecological and economical
value. Vizzini et al. (2005), using stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes to assess environ-
mental impact of aquaculture in the Mediterranean, showed that aquaculture wastes come
into the food web and change the natural isotopic composition of organisms. The authors
found that primary producers, benthic invertebrates and fish were affected. Primary
584 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
producers take up inorganic aquaculture-derived nutrients, and consumers of higher trophic
levels are able to directly ingest particulates (Vizzini et al. 2005). High anthropogenic
nutrient loads have been associated with a decrease of phytoplankton diversity and the
growth of nuisance blooms (Smith et al. 1999; Alonso-Rodrıguez and Paez-Osuna 2003).
Therefore, the monitoring of several indicators at different distances from the facilities, of
both biological and environmental nature, should be undertaken and the results linked with
several factors (such as production system, produced species, season, amount of food) in
order to establish suitable management measures that will avoid severe impacts in the
future. Moreover, the results observed in the present study seem to indicate a positive
effect of SP even in fish farms using a semi-intensive regime. Although benthic assem-
blages from P and SP areas tend to be associated, macrobenthic structure in the latter
appears to be less disturbed, indicating better environmental quality. Therefore, if pro-
duction ponds were in direct connection with the lagoon, the potential environmental
impacts would probably be more severe. In conclusion, the implementation of settlement
ponds in semi-intensive fish farms should be hereafter considered.
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank P. Pereira, F. Leitao, H. Saldanha, A. Silva, I.Ferreira, P. Vasconcelos and J. Guerra for technical support during sampling and laboratory work, as well asthe technicians from the fish farm for feeding and controlling fish production. We are also indebted to C.Martins and M. L. Inacio for their help in field and laboratory analyses. The present investigation wasfinancially supported by the projects ‘‘Tecnologias de Producao Aquıcola’’ MARE (22-05-01-FBR-00014-QCAIII) and PROMAR (INTERREG III A) ‘‘Cooperacao Algarve—Andaluzia para a promocao de Re-cursos Aquıcolas Marinhos no Litoral Atlantico Sul’’, as well as by a Ph.D. grant from Fundacao para aCiencia e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/8521/2002).
References
Alonso-Rodrıguez R, Paez-Osuna F (2003) Nutrients, phytoplankton and harmful algal blooms in shrimpponds: a review with special references to the situation in the Gulf of California. Aquaculture 219:317–336. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00509-4
Bartoli M, Nizzoli D, Naldi M, Vezzulli L, Porrello S, Lenzi M et al (2005) Inorganic nitrogen control inwastewater treatment ponds from a fish farm (Orbetello, Italy): denitrification versus Ulva uptake. MarPollut Bull 50:1386–1397. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.011
Brotas V, Ferreira AA, Vale C, Catarino F (1990) Oxygen profiles in intertidal sediments of Ria Formosa(S. Portugal). Hydrobiologia 207:123–129. doi:10.1007/BF00041448
Bucci M, Ghiara E, Gorelli V, Gragnani R, Izzo G, Morgana L et al (1992) Ecological conditions in theOrbetello lagoon and suggested actions for its restoration. Sci Total Environ Suppl 2:1179–1188
Butler ECV, Blackburn SI, Clementson LA, Morgan PP, Parslow JS, Volkman JK (2001) A survey strategyand environmental monitoring network for an estuary supporting finfish cage culture. ICES J Mar Sci58:460–468. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1028
Byers SC, Mills EL, Stewart PL (1978) A comparison of methods of determining organic carbon in marinesediments, with suggestions for a standard method. Hydrobiologia 58:43–47. doi:10.1007/BF00018894
Carvalho S, Barata M, Gaspar MB, Pousao-Ferreira P, Cancela da Fonseca L (2007) Enrichment ofaquaculture earthen ponds with Hediste diversicolor: consequences for benthic dynamics and naturalproductivity. Aquaculture 262:227–236. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.028
Chamberlain J, Fernandes TF, Read P, Nickell TD, Davies IM (2001) Impacts of biodeposits from sus-pended mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) culture on the surrounding surficial sediments. ICES J Mar Sci58:411–416. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1037
Chou CL, Haya K, Paon LA, Moffatt JD (2004) A regression model using sediment chemistry for theevaluation of marine environmental impacts associated with salmon aquaculture cage wastes. MarPollut Bull 49:465–472. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.039
Christensen PB, Rysgaard S, Sloth NP, Dalsgaard T, Schwærter S (2000) Sediment mineralization, nutrientfluxes, denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in a estuarine fjord with seacage trout farming. Aquat Microb Ecol 21:73–84. doi:10.3354/ame021073
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 585
123
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER (Plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research) v5: usermanual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth
Ehler D, Songsangjinda P, Keawtawee T, Chaiyakam K (2007) Nitrogen dynamics in the settlement pondsof a small-scale recirculating shrimp farm (Penaeus monodon) in rural Thailand. Aquac Int 15:55–66.doi:10.1007/s10499-006-9068-8
Falcao M, Vale C (2003) Nutrient dynamics in a coastal lagoon (Ria Formosa, Portugal): the importance oflagoon-sea water exchanges on biological productivity. Cienc Mar 23:425–433
Findlay RH, Watling L, Mayer LM (1995) Environmental impact of salmon net-pen culture on Mainemarine benthic communities: a case study. Estuaries 18:145–179. doi:10.2307/1352289
Gamito S (1997) Application of canonical correspondence analysis to environmental and benthic macro-fauna data of four sites in the Ria Formosa (Portugal). Bol Inst Esp Oceanogr 23:41–52
Gamito S (2006) Benthic ecology of semi-natural coastal lagoons, in the Ria Formosa (Southern Portugal),exposed to different water renewal regimes. Hydrobiologia 555:75–87. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1107-3
Ganguly S, Chatterjee J, Jana BB (1999) Biogeochemical cycling bacterial activity in response to lime andfertilizer applications in pond systems. Aquac Int 7:413–432. doi:10.1023/A:1009289823138
Grasshoff K (1983) Methods of sweater analysis. Verlag Chemie, New YorkGutierrez D, Gallardo VA, Mayor S, Neira C, Vasquez C, Sellanes J et al (2000) Effects of dissolved oxygen
and fresh organic matter on the bioturvation potential of macrofauna in sublittoral sediments of centralChile during 1997/1998 El Nino. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:81–99. doi:10.3354/meps202081
Hall POJ, Anderson LG, Holby O, Kollberg S, Samuelsson MO (1990) Chemical fluxes and mass balancesin a marine fish cage farm. I. Carbon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:61–73. doi:10.3354/meps061061
Hall POJ, Holby O, Kollberg S, Samuelsson MO (1992) Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fishcage farm. IV. Nitrogen. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 89:81–91. doi:10.3354/meps089081
Heilskov AC, Holmer M (2001) Effects of benthic fauna on organic matter mineralization in fish-farm sedi-ments: importance of size and abundance. ICES J Mar Sci 58:427–434. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1026
Heilskov AC, Alperin M, Holmer M (2006) Benthic fauna bio-irrigation effects on nutrient regeneration infish farm sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 339:204–225. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2006.08.003
Holby O, Hall POJ (1991) Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. II. Phosphorous.Mar Ecol Prog Ser 70:263–272. doi:10.3354/meps070263
Holmer M, Kristensen E (1992) Impact of marine fish cage farming on metabolism and sulphate reduction ofunderlying sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 80:191–201. doi:10.3354/meps080191
Hubert FN, Pellaud M, Gamito S (2006) Environmental effects of marine fish pond culture in the RiaFormosa (Southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 555:289–297. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1125-1
Hussenot J, Martin J-LM (1995) Assessment of the quality of pond sediments in aquaculture using simple,rapid techniques. Aquac Int 3:123–133. doi:10.1007/BF00117879
Islam MS (2005) Nitrogen and phosphorous budget in coastal and marine cage aquaculture and impacts ofeffluent loading on ecosystem: review and analysis towards model development. Mar Pollut Bull50:48–61. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.008
Kalantzi I, Karakassis I (2006) Benthic impacts of fish farming: meta-analysis of community and geo-chemical data. Mar Pollut Bull 52:484–493. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.09.034
Karakassis I, Tsapakis M, Hatziyanni E (1998) Seasonal variability in sediment profiles beneath fish farmcages in the Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 162:243–252. doi:10.3354/meps162243
Karakassis I, Hatziyanni E, Tsapakis M, Plaiti W (1999) Benthic recovery following cessation of fish farming: aseries of successes and catastrophes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 184:205–218. doi:10.3354/meps184205
Karakassis I, Tsapakis M, Hatziyanni E, Papadopoulou K-N, Plaiti W (2000) Impact of cage farming of fish on theseabed in three Mediterranean coastal areas. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1462–1471. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0925
Katz T, Herut B, Genin A, Angel DL (2002) Gray mullets ameliorate organically enriched sediments belowa fish farm in the oligotrophic Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:205–214. doi:10.3354/meps234205
Martınez-Cordova LR, Pena-Messina E (2005) Biotic communities and feeding habits of Litopenaeusvannamei (Boone, 1931) and Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson 1974) in monoculture and polyculturesemi-intensive ponds. Aquac Res 36:1075–1084. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01323.x
Mente E, Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Neofitou C (2006) Effect of feed and feeding in the culture of salmonids onthe marine aquatic environment: a synthesis for European aquaculture. Aquac Int 14:499–522. doi:10.1007/s10499-006-9051-4
Millet B, Guelorget O (1994) Spatial and seasonal variability in the relationships between benthic com-munities and physical environment in a lagoon ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 108:161–174. doi:10.3354/meps108161
586 Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587
123
Mohanty R (2001) Feeding management and waste production in semi-intensive farming of Penaeusmonodon (Fab.) at different stocking densities. Aquacult Int 9:345–355. doi:10.1023/A:1020421309414
Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J et al (2000) Effect ofaquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 45:1017–1024. doi:10.1038/35016500
Nunes AJP, Parsons GJ (2000) Effects of the Southern brown shrimp, Penaeus subtilis, predation andartificial feeding on the population dynamics of benthic polychaetes in tropical pond enclosures.Aquaculture 183:125–147. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00278-1
Parsons T, Maita C, Lally C (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods of seawater analysis.Pergamon, Oxford, 173 pp
Pearson TH, Rosenberg R (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollutionof the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 16:229–311
Pereira PMF, Black KD, McLusky DS, Nickell TD (2004) Recovery of sediments after cessation of marinefish farm production. Aquaculture 235:315–330. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.023
Pohle G, Frost B, Findlay R (2001) Assessment of regional benthic impact of salmon mariculture within theLetang Inlet, Bay of Fundy. ICES J Mar Sci 58:417–426. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1039
Porrello S, Ferrari G, Lenzi M, Persia E (2003a) Ammonia variations in land-based fish farm wastewater inphytotreatments ponds. Aquaculture 219:485–494. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00637-3
Porrello S, Lenzi M, Persia E, Finoia MG, Mercatali I, Tomassetti P (2003b) Eutrophication by intensiveaquaculture using a phytotreatment pond system. II. Nitrogen and phosphorous content in pondmacroalgae and sediment. Aquaculture 219:531–544. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00013-9
Riise JC, Roos N (1997) Benthic metabolism and the effects of bioturbation in a fertilised polyculture fishpond in northeast Thailand. Aquaculture 150:45–62. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01466-4
Serpa D, Falcao M, Pousao-Ferreira P, Vicente M (2007a) Biogeochemical processes in semi-intensiveearthen ponds of white seabream. Biogeochemistry 82:291–304. doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9076-4
Serpa D, Falcao M, Pousao-Ferreira P, Vicente M, Carvalho S (2007b) Geochemical changes in whiteseabream (Diplodus sargus) earth ponds during a production cycle. Aquac Res 38:1619–1626. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01829.x
Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater,marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179–196. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3
Sprung M (1994) Macrobenthic secondary production in the intertidal zone of the Ria Formosa—a lagoon insouthern Portugal. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 38:539–558. doi:10.1006/ecss.1994.1037
ter Braak C, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methodsin aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57(3):255–289. doi:10.1007/BF00877430
Tomassetti P, Porrello S (2005) Polychaetes as indicators of marine fish farm organic enrichment. Aquac Int13:109–128. doi:10.1007/s10499-004-9026-2
Tovar A, Moreno C, Manuel-Vez MP, Garcıa-Vargas M (2000) Environmental implications of intensivemarine aquaculture in earthen ponds. Mar Pollut Bull 40:981–988. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00040-0
Troell M, Berg H (1997) Cage fish farming in the tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe: impact and biogeo-chemical changes in sediment. Aquac Res 28:527–544. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01071.x
Vezzulli L, Chelossi E, Riccardi G, Fabiano M (2002) Bacterial community structure and activity of theLigurian sea (Western Mediterranean). Aquac Int 10:123–141. doi:10.1023/A:1021365829687
Vizzini S, Savona B, Caruso M, Savona A, Mazzola A (2005) Analysis of stable carbon and nitrogenisotopes as a tool for assessing the environmental impact of aquaculture: a case study from the westernMediterranean. Aquac Int 13:157–165. doi:10.1007/s10499-004-9023-5
Weston DP (1990) Quantitative examination of macrobenthic community changes along an organicenrichment gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:233–244. doi:10.3354/meps061233
Aquacult Int (2009) 17:571–587 587
123